Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1994-08-02 CC Packet
City of Southlake,Texas TtF.('=U AR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 221994 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. `. 1. Call to order. Invocation. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Reconvene: Action Necessary on items discussed in executive session. - 3. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on July 19, 1994. 4. Reports: A. Mayor's Report. B. City Manager's Report- C. SPIN Reports. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business, and considered in its normal sequence. 5. Consider: A. Resolution No. 94-37, Concurring with the State's plan for the abandonment of the excess drainage easement in Southlake Crossing. B. Authorizing the Mayor to execute the 1994-95 contract for inspection services provided by the Tarrant County Health Department's Consumer Health Division. REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum. City of Southlake,Texas s Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 2, 1994 page two 7. Ordinances, second reading and related items. A. Ordinance No. 480-125, 2nd reading, (ZA 94-66), Rezoning request for a 0.50 acre tract of land situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. Location: South side of North Pevtonyille Avenue approximately 500 feet west of Raven Bend Court west of Sou"Ej ge Lakes Addition. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District. Owner/Applicant: Fred R. Joyce. SPIN Neighborhood#13. PUBLIC HEARING. B. Ordinance No. 480-134, 2nd reading, (ZA 94-68), Rezoning and Concept Plan approval for a 30.4315 acre tract of land in the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706. Location: East side of Shady Oaks Drive approximately 875 feet South of West Highland Street. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of "CS" Community Service District. Owner/Applicant:- Carroll Independent School District. SPIN Neighborhood #11. PUBLIC HEARING. C. ZA 94-77, Preliminary Plat of Carroll Independent School District, Shady Oaks- Elementary Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, being 30.431 acres situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706. Location: Fast side of Shady Oaks Drive ap�roximatsly 875 feet south of West Highland Street Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of "CS" Community Service District. Owner: Carroll Independent School District. Applicant: Cheatham & Associates. SPIN Neighborhood #11. D. Ordinance No. 480-135, 2nd reading, (ZA 94-69), Rezoning request for a 4.7 acre tract of land and a 4.742 acre tract of land situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18. Location: North side of Union Church t'W. Continental Blvd.) anyroximatelx 600' west of Davis Blvd. Current zoning is "I- 1" Light Industrial District. Requested zoning is "SF-lA" Single-Family Residential District. Applicant: City of Southlake. SPIN Neighborhood #15. PUBLIC HEARING. E. Ordinance No. 480-136, 2nd reading (ZA 94-70), Rezoning request for 9.836 acres, being three (3) tracts of land out of the R.P. Estes Subdivision situated in the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107. Location: Fast side of Sam School Roadavoroximately 800' north of West Dove Road. Current zoning is "I-1" Light Industrial District, with a requested zoning of "AG" Agricultural Zoning District. Applicant: City of Southlake. SPIN Neighborhood #11. PUBLIC HEARING. City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 2, 1994 page three 8. Ordinances, first reading and related items. A. Ordinance No. 480-140, 1st reading (ZA 94-73), Rezoning request for a 15.534 acre tract of land situated in the H. Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581. Location: West side of South White Chapel Blvd.. gpproxcimately one-fourth mile north of Continental Blvd.. at 720 South White Chapel Blvd. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, requested zoning of"RE" Single-Family Residential Estates. Owner/Applicant: Lemoine Wright. SPIN Neighborhood #14. B. ZA 94-76, Plat Showing of Lot 1 and Lot 2, Thomas M. Hood No. 706 Addition, being 6.09 acres situated in the Thomas M.Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706. Location: East side of North Peytonville Avenue, approximately 1100 feet North of Raven Bend Court. Current zoning is "SF-lA"- Single Family Residential District. Owners: Kathleen L. Sumner and F.L. Bailey. Applicant: Don Blackburn. SPIN Neighborhood #11. C. ZA 94-78, Plat Revision of Lots 50R and 51R, Block 2, Monticello, Phase III, being 14.712 acres situated in.the William E. Crooks Survey, Abstract No. 295 and the M.M. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 533. Location: South of West Continental Blvd.. east of Continental Park Estates and north of Big Bear Creek. Current zoning is "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner/Applicant: Hills of Monticello, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #14. 9. Resolutions (no items this agenda). 10. Other items for consideration. A. Southlake Women's Club donation. 1.1. Other items for discussion. A. Possible City Charter Amendment. B. 1994-95 Annual Operating Budget. 12. Meeting Adjourned. ` City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeti g Agenda August 2, 1994 page four CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin-boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, July 29, 1994, at 5'00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. ,�q►yutWUNgy 1004 T HCq�cc`� o`` •� Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary, to If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. cc\agn\=e ft\O8-M-19%\d 1' City of Southlake,Texas EXECUTIVE SESSION PENDING LITIGATION-SECTION 551.071 The City Council may consider pending and contemplated litigation subjects. The following subjects may be discussed: 1. West Beach Addition. 2. Legend Custom Homes, 1993 3. Scott and Anne Morrison vs. The Zoning Board of Adjustments, of the City of Southlake, and the City of Southlake. 1993 4. Appeal to City of Southlake Board of Adjustments by George M. Barclay, of Administrative Officials opinion, in issuing of building permit (ZBA Case #204). 1994 Litigation is, by nature, an on-going process, and questions may arise as to trial tactics-which need to be explained to the City Council. Upon occasions, the City Council may need information from the City Attorney as to the status of the pending or contemplated-litigation subjects set out above. After discussion of the pending and contemplated litigation subjects in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in executive session. LAND ACOUISITION SECTION 551.072 The City Council may consider the purchase, exchange, lease, or sale of real property. After discussion of land acquisitions in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in public. PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.074 The City Council may consider the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City Board and Commission Members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office. DEPLOYMENT OF SECURITY PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.076 Regarding the deployment or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in public by the City Council. If personnel issues or litigation issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting, an executive session will be held. mkxe1ee=\7-29-94W City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 29, 1994 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Shana Rice, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting August 2, 1994 1. Aizenda Item No. 4. SPIN Reports. This week Assistant City Manager Shana Rice will report on the TEAM Focus exercise, and Betty Springer from neighborhood #10 and Youth Delegate Katie Holzegraefe will report on their neighborhood meetings. The Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN), as you know, is well underway. SPIN Neighborhood Chairs met at IBM on Wednesday to participate in the TEAM Focus exercise. Each of the SPIN leaders worked with their neighborhoods to answer the following: 1) What do you like about Southlake? 2) What do you want to change about Southlake? 3) What do you NOT want to change about Southlake? A packet of the TEAM Focus SPIN responses will be completed and disseminated to you during work session. The information gathered during TEAM Focus will be used to develop a citizen satisfaction survey, which will be used as the basis for developing the strategic plan, Southlake 2010. 2. Agenda Item No 5A Resolution No 94-37 Abandonment of 0.432 acre portion of drainage easement on F.M. 1938 (at Southlake Crossing). Note in the memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, that the drainage easement is no longer needed since the channel has been contained in a box culvert. 3. Aizenda Item No 5B Authorizing the Mayor to execute the 1994-95 contract for services provided by Tarrant County Health Department for inspection of food Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 29, 1994 Page 2 establishments and public swimming_pools. This will renew our existing contract with Tarrant County. There were no changes made. Note the contract provision pertains to un blic pool inspection, not private pool inspections. 4. Agenda Item No 7A. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-125, ZA 94-66, Fred Joyce rezoning request for a 0.50 acre tract of land from AG to SF-20A. There have been no changes with zoning since 1st reading. FYI, not related to zoning, the applicant has submitted a Plat Revision on SouthRidge Lakes which will incorporate this land into the adjacent platted lots. 5. Agenda Item No 7B 2nd Reading Ordinance No. 480-134, (ZA 94-68). C.I.S.D. rezoning request for a 30.4315 acre tract of land, Shady Oaks Drive. Staff has met with (W the C.I.S.D. staff and their consultants to work through the issues brought up at the first reading. It is important to emphasize that this application includes several joint use projects (i.e. soccer fields, ball fields, etc.). Staff has worked with the C.I.S.D. staff to come up with the following suggested resolution to the issues. 1. Center turn lane: C.I.S.D. has hired a traffic consultant to evaluate the need for a turn lane resulting in the C.I.S.D. intent to construct a center turn lane from approximately 200' south of the south drive to 250' north of the north drive. Shady Oaks is planned to be a 60' ultimate R.O.W. and staff feels this solution would be adequate. 2. Vertical curve at south drive: The C.I.S.D. traffic consultant has measured the drive distances in relation to the vertical curves on Shady Oaks. He feels that the site distances will be adequate as proposed. Staff concurs. 3. Bufferyards: There is no bufferyard required along Shady Oaks. The north and south lines are recommended to be 200' of 6' wood fence and from Shady Oaks and six (6) canopy trees along the fence with no irrigation. It was felt that this Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 29, 1994 Page 3 would provide the needed protection for the adjacent residences. Staff recommends that the installation of the east bufferyard be postponed until the adjacent property is developed. At that time the intensity and placement of the bufferyard could be evaluated. 4. Interior landscaping_ The combined staffs developed an idea for a comprehensive landscape plan which would provide an extensive variety of plants for an educational nature resource. Landscaping would be provided over time by C.I.S.D., through donation of plants and volunteer efforts in conjunction with Keep Southlake Beautiful and other community programs. The number of plants would be approximately be half of the plants required by the landscape ordinance. This is appropriate since much of the school's land area is to be used as athletic fields and play areas by both the school and the community at large. It is important that we do not restrict the use of the open space by requiring the planting of too many trees. 6. Agenda Item No. 7C ZA 94-77, Preliminary Plat, C.I.S.D., Shady Oaks Elementary Addition, Lot 1. Block 1. There are no significant issues with this plat. Note the C.I.S.D. is proposing a detention pond in the north portion of the property. 7. Aizenda Item Nos 7D and 7E. Cily initiated rezoning. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-135 (ZA 94-69) Union Church Blvd. (W. Continental), L-I to SF-lA and 2nd Reading Ordinance No. 480-136 (ZA 94-70), Sam School Road, I-1 to AG. There have been no changes since first reading. 8. Agenda Item No 8A 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-140 (ZA 94-73), rezoning request for a 15.534 acre tract of land AG to RE, applicant Lemoine Wright. The applicant desires to zone his property at this time so that, if any development occurs adjacent to his property, the new development would be required to provide lots of 30,000 sq. ft. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and,Other Items of Interest July 29, 1994 Page 4 9. Agenda Item No. 8B. Plat Showing, ZA 94-76, Lot 1 and Lot 2, Hood No. 706 Addition east side of N. Pgytonville Ave. approximately 1000' north of Raven Bend Subdivision. The applicants have resubmitted their plat with two lots rather than the three previously submitted. The only issue is the thoroughfare plan designation for the continuation of Highland. Staff previously provided an exhibit with some alternatives; staff s interpretation of the Council's opinion is that Council believes that the most likely extension would be north through the Bradley property, not impacting this plat. 10. Aizenda Item No. 10A. Southlake Women's Club donation. As outlined in the memo from Assistant City Manager Shana Rice, the Women's Club would like to donate$3,050 to be used specifically towards the purchase of a lighted "readerboard" activity sign for Bicentennial Park. The Club suggested two sites, both of which have limitations. A location on F.M. 1709 at the park entrance may be difficult due to the limited width of the road, the drainage easement, and the importance of maintaining good visibility for vehicular and pedestrian movements at that intersection. A location at the entry along White Chapel could raise concerns with regard to the lighting and aesthetics of the sign and the potential impact on the surrounding residents. Since the sign is to "advertise" park and recreation activities, other locations may not be suitable, but this is an issue Council may wish to explore. Council may wish to consider this item in the context of anticipated changes to the City's sign ordinance. As in most instances, any problems can perhaps be overcome with thorough study of the alternatives. 11. Agenda Item No 11A Discussion of possible City Charter amendments. City Charter elections are governed by Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code. The City Charter was last amended in January 1991 which, among other things, changed terms of office for the Mayor and Councilmembers to three years, allowed the mayor to vote, and increased councilmembers to six. In the three years since, staff has noticed several areas (46W in which Charter language could be strengthened, or provisions revised to allow for more effective and efficient operation of the City. For example, Section 3.11 of the Charter provides that "...ordinances and resolutions may be passed at any regular meeting or Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 29, 1994 Page 5 special meeting called for that purpose." (emphasis added) However, Section 3.13 provides that ordinances "...shall be read in open meetings of the City Council on two (2) separate Council meetings which shall be a regular meeting..." There is a conflict in this language, which in effect prevents ordinances from being passed at special meetings. Also, by.requiring that the preamble of the ordinance be read before it can be passed, it in effect reasonably prevents ordinances from being placed on the Consent Agenda. If routine ordinances could be placed on the Consent Agenda, and if the preamble could be required to be read only on the second reading (i.e., before passage), meetings could be shortened, perhaps considerably in some instances. Council may also wish to consider limiting the number of development cases that are placed on the agenda. (See memo from Greg Last, Community Development Director, attached hereto.) Limiting the number of cases could significantly limit the length of meetings. Staff is currently processing approximately 27 development cases at one stage or another. We are making every effort to continue to process other agenda items as well, but it is a scheduling nightmare. There are other issues that also might be addressed, for example, a Charter Committee could explore the possibility of including an ethics policy for city officials (elected and appointed), regulating conflict of interest. Council may also wish to consider extending the term of office for the Municipal Judge to that of the Mayor and Councilmembers. Staff would appreciated the opportunity to discuss the possibility of a charter amendment election with the Council. If we are going to do so, the best time is November. If City Council wants to pursue amending the charter, State statutes allows two methods whereby charter amendments can be presented to the voters: (1) the City Council can decide on its own to submit proposed amendments to the voters; or(2)the City Council can appoint Cw a Charter Review Committee to make a recommendation to the Council on proposed amendments to present to the voters. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 29, 1994 Page 6 12. Agenda Item No. 11B. FY1994-95 Annual Operating Budget. Budget recommendations for the 1994-95 Annual Operating Budget are required by Charter to be filed with the City Secretary's Office by August 1; therefore the budget will be filed with the City Secretary by 5:00 p.m. Monday. There will be discursion item concerning the 94-95 budget on this Council meeting agenda and the August 16 agenda. There will also be a budget work session on August 17 and 18 tentatively scheduled for 6:30 p.m. There will also be agenda items on September 6 and September 20 which will include public hearings on the budget and the tax rate ordinance. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 13. Update on Road Projects - The following outlines our progress on road projects: South Peytonville: The drainage work on South Peytonville will be completed within the week, and then the county will be coming in to pave the road. It is not yet clear when paving will be completed. North Carroll: Water lines have been installed and drainage work will be completed within two weeks. Sunmount Corporation will serve as the paving contractor on the project. Paving should be completed 4-6 weeks after it has begun. South Kimball at F.M. 1709: Construction of this road is underway, with completion expected in eight weeks. North Kimball: A contract for the piece of Kimball between S.H. 114 and F.M. 1709 will be coming to you on August 16th. Low bidder on the project was J.R. Bertram. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 29, 1994 Page 7 14. It appears that Teen Court could become a multi-jurisdictional program. Judge Brad Bradley and I have met with staff from the City of Grapevine, City of Colleyville, Grapevine Colleyville Independent School District and Carroll Independent School District to discuss the possibility of forming a Teen Court to serve all of these entities. Our staff is currently working on a interlocal agreement detailing implementation and operational procedures. We will be coming to you soon with details for your consideration. 15. Corridor MeetinL. The Corridor Advisory Committee (CAC) held a public meeting Tuesday evening, July 26, 1994 which was well attended by many citizens and several interested land owners and developers. You will find attached a summary of the issues discussed at this meeting, as well as the previous CAC meeting, and an article from the Grapevine Sun. The main emphasis from the comments seemed to be a concern that all future commercial development be of the same quality as the residential development in the City. The next phase is the accumulation of possible ideas to include all three corridors (S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, and F.M. 1938). The Consultants are accumulating slides and other examples and anticipate making a presentation in approximately six (6) weeks. 16. Baseball Proposal Update. The applicant has revised the submittal by acquiring approximately 4 acres south of the site and shifting the improvements south. They are also relocating the fields closer to the road and moving their building to the rear of the site to act as a buffer for the residential development. The case will be before P&Z on August 18, 1994. 17. Request to rename a portion of S. Kimball Ave. Staff has received a request from Edna Beech of Beech Overhead Door (see attached letter dated 7/25/94) which request that the City rename the portion of South Kimball between Crooked Lane and E. Continental. Per the thoroughfare plan, at some point in the future, this portion of Kimball will no longer be Kimball because of our intent to take Kimball directly south to Continental. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 29, 1994 Page 8 Staff does not foresee a problem with this request. If Council is receptive, staff can notify the owners of land along the portion of roadway and hold a public hearing at a future Council meeting. 18. Amortization of non-conforming uses. You will recall that the 1993 L.U.P. update identified many legal non-conforming uses in the City. At a recent work session you asked us to evaluate those uses and bring forward a summary for you to discuss concerning the possible need to pursue amortizing some uses. Staff will prepare a summary similar to the summary presented to Council concerning potential sites for rezoning due to non-compliance with the L.U.P. He will bring this forward as quickly as possible, hopefully in the next 2-3 Council meetings. 19. The 1994 City Council Retreat report included in your notebook has been compiled from the materials handed out at the retreat. It is available in our office upon request. City of Southlake,Texas MEM0RAND=JM July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: City-imposed Limitations on Monthly Planning &Zoning Cases Attached are the preliminary results of a phone survey to see if other cities with comparatively high rates of growth activity place limits on the number of development cases. Planning and zoning departments from the cities of Flower Mound, Grapevine, Mansfield, Cleburne, Plano and Richardson were contacted by Chris Carpenter, Planning Intern. They were asked if the number development cases were limited, and , if the response was yes, they were further asked about the number and type of cases limited, and the basis of the limitation-policy, ordinance, or other. Also attached is a copy of Grapevine's P&Z bylaws which set the number of zoning cases per meeting. To summarize, four of the six cities surveyed limit the number of cases in some manner and/or use outside consultants to handle excessive case load. If you would like additional information from other cities, please let me know. ��li City of Southlake,Texas PHONE SURVEY: AREA CITIES LIMITING THEIR NUMBER OF CASES 1. Flower Mound: City Council held executive session at the request of the City Manager to generate an informal policy which limits the number of cases to two (2) zoning,two (2) preliminary plats and two (2) final plats per month. These figures do not include SUPs, one- and two-lot plattings, plat revisions or plat amendments. 2. Mansfield: Though cases have not been limited per se, the city has at times increased the lead time between submittal and city action from two, to three, to four weeks during times of unusual workloads. The city has in the past farmed out notification processes and other zoning paperwork to private companies who certify their work. Fee increases (city currently requires a $1000 zoning change request fee)to pay for additional labor were stated as the preferred means of coping with heavier case traffic. 3. Grapevine: The city currently limits the number of zoning cases to six (6)per month,but does not limit the number of platting cases.The Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commission by- laws containing the language of the limitations are attached. 4. Richardson: Zoning cases are informally limited to 2-3 per month,but there are no limits on platting. CAW PF%MEMO\,STAFF\CS_LIMTS.WPD s 1 ig34 GRAPEVINE CODE to commission members,attend to the correspondence of the com- mission,and such other duties as are normally carried out by the department of community development.It shall be the duty of the - department of community development to submit to the commis- sion the minutes of the previous meeting so that the same may be corrected,if necessary,to reflect fairly accurately the proceedings heard at the last meeting. and said minutes shall not be official until they are adopted by a majority vote of the commission. (Ord. No. 82-70, § 1, 10-19-82; Ord.No. 86-40, § 1, 6-17-86) Sec. 1935. Meetings. (a) Attertdance.-All members must inform the chairman, vice- chairman,or another member of the commission if they expect to be absent at a particular meeting, giving the reason for their absence.If any member fails to provide such notification for three (3) consecutive meetings missed by said member, the planning and zoning commission may vote to bring this to the attention of the city council. (b) Regular meetings- Regular meetings shall be held on the third Tuesday of each month in the council chambers of the city ,. hall, unless otherwise determined by the commission. It is the intent of the commission to consider no more than six(6)zoning ;COSea peer meeting.Iaf an unusually large number of zoning causes should occur,the commission may schedule an additional meeting concurrently with the city council. (c) Spacial meetings. Special meetings for any purpose may be held:(1)on the call of the chairman;(2)upon request of two(2)or more members;or(3) as may be scheduled by a ms;jority of the commission at any previous meeting. At the request of the city council the time and place of the special meeting shall be deter- mined by the converting authority. (d) Tii annual meetings.Three 13)meetings will be held to keep abreast of the master plan and planning activity.These meetings will be hell in January, May, and September unless otherwise notified by the chairman of the planning and zoning commission. (e) Quorum. Five (5) members of the commission shall consti- tute a quorum- Supp.No.65 1314 • 94 THU 1 1 : 26 W i I sor-0 gssoc i cLyt 4--- s d • SouthIake Corridor Study + � 28 July 1994 SOUTHLAKE CORRIDOR ISSUES Comments received from Me 26 July 1994 Public Meefing regarding the Corrider Plan for SH 114, Hwy. 1709 and 1938, Issues • Consistency of aesthetics-- Quality of commercial development versus the quality of homes in the area Height of buildings Tightening of masonry requirement Roof lines and pitch • Pole signs and Billboards • Overhead electric lines • Strip retail—limit frontage roads • DFW noise cone and its effect on residential development • Suffering of land uses • Enforcement of development ordinances • Lack of City identity through entry features and street character « Muli-family • Truck traffic • Regional issues regarding thoroughfares, retail and other land uses + Sticking to the Plant once it is adopted Opportunities • Development of an urban design theme • Use of icons along highway versus pole signs Limiting the amount of commercially zoned land to the amount that can be supported by the community • Town Center versus strip development + Creation of City entry features • Retention of existing, and inclusion of new trees in developments • Presence of high quality developers • Good working relationship with TXDOT « Provision of bicycle and pedestrian access + Inclusion of SPIN responses from the NCTCOG 2014 planning process Vision A SH 114 corridor which presents a positive image for the City—one of a semi- rural residential community with trees and landscaping. The corridor should reflect a unified urban design character, include a "Town Center", avoid strip retail, and include a comfortable buffer between the residential neighborhoods (aw and the highway and commercial development. !$ - 94 THIJ 1 1 2e W i I son & Ass OG i nt E s P _ 03 Southlake Corridor Study 10 April 1994 SOUTHLAKE CORRIDOR ISSUES Comments received from a Workshop with the Corridor Advisory Committee 4 April 1994 SH 114 Issues: • Control of Oevelopment in ROW prior to State acquisition. • Impact of small development tracts. + Limited access of 114 East bound access to White Chapel is near Dove Rd. Traffic patterns due to limited access (e.g. 114 and Carroll). • Need intermediary collectors. • Phasing of development related to utilities Water usage on short term could be a problem: long term supply will be from N. Fort Worth along 114. Now only source is from Keller, and no water along 114 now. Sewer being installed at Kimball, near Wallmart, could spur development in this area. + Bikeway is planned for White Chapel over 114. SH 114 Opportunities: Opportunity for future development Major retail on 180-acre area at 1709 and 114. Largely undeveloped along 114 + Large land developers (Mobil, and McGuire Thomas) * Creation of a Southlake identity. SH 114 Vision: + Office campus style; Las Colinas style. + Major retailing at 114 and 1709 FM 1709/Davis Issues • Sewer extensions are paid for by developer, since area west of Oavis is already subdivided into (large) residential lots, it will likely remain residential. • West of Davis is Keller ISD—no demand for residential in this area. + Small land owners. • Several non-conforming-land uses are located along Davis. FM 1709JDavis Opportunities + Sewer is being placed up the creek next to Davis and will spur development. FM 1709/Davis Vision + Davis could be the service area for the City and N. Richland Hills vs SH 114 being the white-collar employment area for the City. • Davis could become the blue-collar employment area of the City. + Combined pad sites and large retail, east of Davis on FM 1709. Page I tr o, N •-�n 0 Ao a•o £ ti 5 9 b0 � 'o, m cl.0 �� 0 W 7 •� fD A O w•'1 p 9 2•Q.A o RQ n O'�f n—0.n o M, �i 4 S :. a o y rn 7 A 7 m o o m 7 m w A O o A n w o ° gyp. o a.ty en*m ° `� O °Q n m R n cGi m 0 G � cr 'Mo co cD D �• m v v m m Cr =r . 0 C.to cD „...y . 0 S.w e' y e* .Q n � -t A C m o v' N .m eG*G N �' C O. 7 G. a-- a.3'' �.SD c.C� O O Obi 7 R � Go o cD y 4 �° Noy < 7 0 o t0 O C. p„n w m W,m R 7•� �.o y �:m M B G cc (0 R A 0 (D w O R .O CY (9 > a G a 0 O m N q to S < n CY 7 j 3 F e* A �Q cD m j w o T7 m p. .p,p -+ vi�m m �m m 7 ~ vyi .D-•O fD p. (D t`n fD QO w NO OOp A a M7" N E a N 1►+0 y O o i-'CO O�'O 7 O N 7 •ate-O o on ��• � N •y e*7 .P� to CD 0.-1 F CD y R A 'G m m ongm IA o .o � � � o mo' w a. A R R 41 Q1 R rOr. G.7 m < U)z �7'CDOQ m, zr m �*S.aG `° a `°°° m -��* m ID X +w fD w R c*A i*m t`�Y cD OG 7c•„O� 7 O S O C0 7 S m O fD .w�-.(AD 7 O PV�r CVy ID :E p O O G��.—.0 -t� A b" C3.O ; 7mc'.0 tl) R C A �.7 to O •�•r4 ._.O 7C'fi' p�p w•N a0+ O'er f�..Ei c~D p.,� .►tSG1�'m A oR ena'n.j-� ?�<< o�Sy m RS'y G coo o p w R R n yIm. 7 A•n o R R '0 A �'p' CD C. O O y N N 0'� R 7 A' w 0 fD O (OD N fD 7'O '•X f<D O J�yT,...=r �.'A = O C U. 3 7 H ..." fii 0:ti � m CO _.v� 'p CD0 �0 K �hr'w'1 O < Cr:O� O �y.T. CD O p 'y �.O O (D �• N r' A 0'�..� w 0 rn w G S.o R "'h G<< y rS'• A, m m A A r' o w cD •a �,. � '< o G m � Rcyo �m � wg7� ' to A C9 O X,y. a� 7C,G.. �.N ', F ems•. Ia. ^ r fD (D<< (A S CO R M fD O (D 3 y r1 Cep O TJ P. . O 0 m•� •`r, R •y � •ry d.RQ+wwR"' O �c p 0 op T p0m D �= .y m CD Vl 3 R R y !r ocF Cs. R =' mx='coN:iptn � � c<Do7q �- (A vyi 000q O' in CA7 C. pL (DIe7r w m S O,y 44 ems-• d c� pi 0 D �t/i A•f X m�• O O Vi (D cli.N yam' dam 7 m n m o o (n S 3. fp �3.In C. Cs.. o - '4 0 m E R A ?1 w M, C.I. O LLR<< CD fD �• R �•R W aA 2• (D `C 0 �,M m 0 <. f 3 T° m o 0 7� m cc�Dccp p1 A i fD A w A O n OA R w w n So � � �dn N cz�.(<D �? 0 a. < �y E N m m 1 O-ftO 0 9'N y n fD n w N G w.O qi y•�' fD ('�fAD a' 4 7" a'N ?•"9".O 'T7 'f �•R ID N N O C1.�pQ' 7 R CT < O 7 N A w�< f0D n N O N Oq O .:•m 'L�� 10 �D eV1+ O fD O A =.R G� w �J (�,. CD "'y O'm 3• �r.a n,R' L'.Co G fOa �• O 0 `D< =r -Oi,0 `D cr O• m n �•=' m .+m u, R Z7 7 O 7'c+... co AcD � ° co cn oRyE `O�yw � p.jo � = m � coa,� mE <Doa.£ a7. cp' w 7 a A m cD o p 3 m ,'n o m 3 m m y a� m co 3 mOq �zp,w o.cyD tD R i •a-n m y v 7 m 7 w w o'CO t7 y o.c vRi p-`< a oCD f C3. co A CD w 7 < p •p R <•Rcr (D X R e+•7 7 CD CDG. CO y! r-�Q.. R. A CA (D O fD O<< << p O m N m a-. O . CD I :j 4 N < N 7 m cm+m N a F 7 CD CD < 71? 7 m C1. y '�'�'�< fD n LL m m in •o•� cyD A 7� y..p 0 Z.m •N (A (D < S� fy9. .N •�.. 0 CD . CD Q•CO •� y A O mEf y Oq �• A 0 7 0 7 /yam• p.Q et 203 k CZ. N a+RN (,D< rL g- 3 y y Ry T O d _ m m N C7 m o C�o cr p P v Fi n O F �v m C A H N C7t Croj < 7 fD c� ,� H s'0 m CDO GG�r ry fpryDl p•`D 0 '� r'CD 7c rL n 0 00 =. ._e0•.a y .IAN m m CD A CD cy7'o p7N Co`< N 7 m UQ BEECH'S OVERHEAD DOOR, INC. Aime 1000 South Kimball Avenue - Southlake, Texas 76092 Fort Worth/Mid-Cities Metro Dallas/Lewisville 817/ 488-8151 817/ 481-6362 2141436-3306 ........................................... .�e.�to v c D July 25, 1994 2 8 W4 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 . Reference: Street Name Change South Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Hawk: Our business is located at 1000 South Kimball Avenue in Southlake. I don't know if you are aware where this is but, I would bet, this is one of the most confusing addresses in the city. First of all, there is "North Kimball Avenue" which is listed in the Mapsco as 26D (300N-1599N), then there is "South Kimball Avenue" which is listed in the Mapsco as 26M (100S-1099S). Our address is 1000 South Kimball Avenue, which, according to the Mapsco should be 26M; however, this is not correct -- we are actually 26R (we are located between Crooked Lane and East Continental Blvd). Attached are copies of the Mapsco Index and Map 26 which are in the 1994 Fort Worth Mapsco. Also, there is an proposed extension of South Kimball Avenue (which I believe has been approved) that crosses Crooked Lane. When this happens, what happens to the South Kimball Avenue on which we are located? I'm sure it is inevitable that there will have to be a street name change at that time (and, hopefully, to something that does not include "Kimball"). We are requesting that this name change be made immediately and not wait for the proposed extension in order to try to clear up the confusion now. You should try to give directions to our office or hear what people have to say that try to find us using a Mapsco. When you take Crooked Lane to our office, you go to the corner where Crooked Lane changes or turns into South Kimball Avenue, there is no street sign whatsoever, so how is anyone to know that our street is not Crooked Lane -- maybe that would be better. Mr. Hawk -2- July 25, 2994 f � " We would appreciate whatever could be done right away to get this straightened out -- it will have to be done eventually anyway. Why not do it now? We have been in this location for nine (9) years and should have requested this long ago. If you need any additional information, please let us know. Very truly yours, Johnny . Beech Edna E. Beech JLB/eb cc: Greg Last, Director, Community Development Enclosures: Copy of 1994 Fort Worth Mapsco Index & Map 26 KEGLER HASLET RD-KING GEORGE DR STREET MAP ZIP CODE BLOCK - STREET MAP ZIP CODE BLOCK STREET MAP ZIP CODE BLOCK . 1 KELLER HASLET RD 7V 76178 - 2600-2599 KENNEDY CT 36Z 76148 6400.6599 KEVIN DR ENN Y in 78118 760p-7799 i Fort Worth Watauugpaa Richland Huts (even) 68 76M 3000.3696 K DR 69T 76011 2100-2199 KEVIN LNgton 83W 78014 100 188 (even) 6R 76177 100-M KENNEDY DR 400 76034 6800-6699 KEVIN MILLER RD 1008 76060 400-490 i (Odd) 76052 101-999 Caney" Kerredde 78 78177 10001699 KENNEDY LN 34Y 78131 900.999 KEY OR 970 76014 3300.33Bp 60 70052 10ON-299N Saginaw . on Unincorporated Tarrant Cokxrly KENNEDY ST 77C 76102 1500.1690 KEYHOLE CT,E 46G 76135 4600 4M 7V 76178 2600.2999 1 N of 15W E Larrastar Ave Lake Worth , (odd) BS 76262 3001-3699 KENNEDY ST 36Z 76148 5600-5799 KEYHOLE CT,W 460 76135 4600-4699 (even) - 8X 76240 3700.4698 Watauga Lake Worth (odd) 76178 3701-4699 KENNETH OR 661111 76040 1-190 KEYSTONE OR 491 76006 2600-2690 h lever) 9W 76248 4700.6098 Euless Arlington _ (odd) 76178 4701.5099 KENNEYST 1070 76060 10ON-29ON KEY WEST CT 103H 76133 3700-370 (even) 6K 76177 30ON-119ON Kennedale 10TH 76060 ZOOS-299S NW tr 7100 South Ridge Tr (odd) 78052 3DIN-119ON KENNINGTONOR 860 76012 23DD-2399 KIDODR $IV 76013 2600-2790 KELLER HICKS RD Arlington P�1epo Fat Worth KENO LN 36J 751 W 7400.7409 KILDEE LN 103F 76133 7100-7190 (even) 21 F 76177 1900-2298 North Richland Hills N Ir 7200 Wind Chin Or 76178 2300-2399 KENSHIRE CT 406 76034 63004499 KILKENNY CT - 3478 76205 900.909 (even) 211111 76178 24OD-2698 Coffeyville Denton i 76178 2700.2890 KENSHIRE DR 88R 76126 100499 KILLALA CT 97F 76014 3400.3499 ;(even) 22L 76248 2900.3698 BenbrookArlingt on Keller 23J 76248 100-199 KENSHIRE DR 40B 76034 6200.6299 KILLARNEY VC 78051 1200.1299 'Uhlncorporeted...TarrantCounty Coffeyville Grapevine (odd) 2/F 76177 1901-22911 KENSINGER CT 11Y 78039 3OD499 NNorth R EIch Anted Wffs �B 78180 5600.5809, ;I (�) 21M 76170 2401.2600 Euless (aid) 22L 76248 78248 gp 48gp KENSINGTON CT 93R 76016 47004799 KILLDEER CIR SOL 76108 8200.82g9 AANq NE I W ShaYvNw Or KELLER SWTHFIELD RD 241 76248 I ODN-59M KENSit OTON CT 39Z 76021 900.999 KILLDEER CT 26E 76092 Nay I; f Keller 24S 7624a LOOS-14M Bedford NorthW ' KELLEY CT 66R 76120 400-590 KENSINGTON CT 24Z 76180 8500 0599 N fr 7500 Lowery Rd No Richland Hills KID TRML 26E 76092 Nay KELLEY CT 18N 76020 1500.1589 KENSINGTON OR 78P 78110 IWD-2499 KILLIANDR 82L 76013 1300-ifi9p '1 Jull Pelican Bay 2 W of 2000 Forest Park Blvd i� KELLEY DR 111116111 76140 500.1099 KENSINGTON LN 124E 76063 700T99 ArinLIANgton esC 78119 36004309 ,Everman E&W If 4200 Muter Ave KELLI CT 49X 76106 34003499 KENSINGTON LN 24Z 76160 Nay KLLOUGH NW fr 2500 E Long Ave North Richland Hills Newark ST 20 76071 200 499 KELLIS ST 92G 76119 3300E.3599E KENSINGTON PL 401.1 76034 2500.2609 KEUER OR $10 76180 5400.54" W k 5000 Shaddeford St Coffeyville North Richland Huts 3 S of 4200 Martin Ave 92H 76119 4200E4299E KENT CT 1240 76063 1410 KILPATRICK AVE 74R 76107 4600.6990 1 S of 4600 Mann Ave 93E 76119 4300E4599E Mansfield E&W N 3800 Ham St E&W 1r4300Hemphill 91J 76115 10DW-MW KENTDR 83U 76010 1500.2099 K 97F 76014 34003499 E&WfiNDR KELLY CIR 66R 78040 1-198 Arlington84S 76010 2100-2399 AringtonEuless KENT M6V 75028 Nay KIN CT 100Z 76063 1-" KELLY ST 77M 78104 1900.1989 Flowerr Mound Mansfield N of 1900 E Maddox Ave KENT ST 75Z 76109 3500.3599 K KArlington BOB 76017 4300-5M ELLY ELLIOTT RD 95J IN LN 36E 78180 7400.7599 Mitt 4200-4299 W of 3000 Stadium Or M North Richland Hills 76017 6900.6599 KDenton 347Y 78201 400.489 KNOALL AVE 12Z 76092 1600N-2999N KELLY GLENN LN SIX 76017 41004299 KENTCROFT DR 63C 76011 1500.15N Grapey 13S 7&)51 2200W-30g8W Arlington Arlington 290 76092 30014-1591IN KELLY HILL DR DOW 76017 4300-4399 KENE CKY AVE 77F 76102 2300-2399 26M 76092 t00S-1099S Arlington 76017 5200-5299 S h 1200 E Lancaster Ave KIMBALL ST 124S 76063 100E-590E KELLY PERKINS RD 9616 76016 36004299 S it 800 E Vickery Blvd 76104 100S-8996 Mansfield 76063 1 OOW-79OW Arlington KENTWOOD CIR 63H 76021 600.890 KIMBERLY 3460 76M Nona KELLY TERRACE 63T 76010 500-M Bedford Denton Arlington 76010 1400-16M KENT WOOD Pl. 66Z 76112 8200 8299 KBABERLY CT 36X 76137 6000.6109 KELPIE CT 63K 76111 1200-1299 E It 1600 Oak Hill Rd Haltom City INEofI100 Oakhurst ScenicOr KENWAYCT 09P 76132 46OG4699 KIMBERLY CT 109Z 76063 - 1-99 KELROY ST 92M 76119 3900.4399 W fr 5300 Wasthaven Or MAnsfleid 1 N of 3900 Mani ffe d Hwy KENWICK AVE 74L 76116 61008490 KIMBERLY YFNNt 369 76180 7600.7M KELSEY CT 648H 75026 3300.35M 2 NW of 8100 Camp Bowie Blvd Richland Flower Mound KENWOOD 347H 76205 14OD-1599 KIMBERLY CT 1SR 76020 1800-im KELSEY CT 40H 76051 3600-4099 Denton Pelican Say Grapevine KENWOOD AVE 720 76116 3300-3699 KIMBERLY OR 43V 76010 IWO.2199 KELSEY LN 95P 76017 45OD4699 N&S fr 9600 Bank head Hwy Arlington Arlington KENWOOOCT 76H 76103 42OD4399 KIMBERLY GDR 135 76051 26OD-2999 !i KELTON ST 104F 76133 2500-25N E tr 2500 Oakland Blvd 4 N of 25M Sycamore School KEN WOOD CT 110Z 76063 Noe KIMBERLY LN B9R 76M 35OD-38911 KELVIN AVE B9Z 76133 3100.3899 Mansfield SE fr 5000 Trail LAM Or E&W It 6000 Vega Or KENWOOD DR 41G 76051 43004M KWBERLY KAY DR 90X 76133 6000-WN � KEMBLE CT 6SX 76103 1600.1699 Grapevine 2 SE of S900 McCart Ave N of 45M Meadowbrook Or KENWOOD TERRACE 92P 76013 1700-I Ng KIMBO CT 630 76111 2900.2999 (;t KEMBLE ST 65W 76103 4500-5099 Arlington 1 E of 2800 Sylvania Ave N of 4500 Meadowbrook Or KENYA CT 47Z 76106 2700.2799 KIMBO RD 630 76111 2600.3099 KEMP CT 124S 76063 400499 S fr 3600 Kearney Ave N of 3100 NE 28th St Mansfield KERRY ST B3M 76013 200.209 KIMBO RD 64A 76117 3900.4009 KEMP OR 97Y 76018 5200-SM Arlington 76013 WO-799 Hellom City Arlington KEREN Pl. 63K 76053 4004" KIMBROUGH RD 29C 76020 400-1199 j KEMP RO 67A 76118 9200•9299 Hurst S3J 76M 700-799 Azle N It 2900 Precinct Line Rd KERLEY ST 347H 76M 700.1498 KIMBROUOM ST 73C 76106 400.1398 KEMPER AVE 118K 76036 500-M Denton White SetOerteM Crowley KERMIT AVE 73V 76116 7100.7899 KIMZEY ST 76M 76107 2500.3290 F4 KEMPER OR 124H 76063 900-M E&W fr US Hwy 377 1 E of 3000 Montgomary St Mansfield KERR ST 601 76112 6300.6M KINCAID CT 73S 76116 89008990 'r KEMPTON OR 110911 76017 2700-2829 NE It 6300 Lancaster Ave Benbrook .., Arlington KERRI OR 26Z 76051 3000.3098 KINCAID OR 736 76116 6800.8999 i KEN AVE 109A 76017 60OD-6299 Grapevine 8enbrook } Arlington KERRY CT 111E 76036 None KIND ST 106A 76140 3000.3090 KEN ST 446W 76226 100499 Crowley W of Wichita St Argyle - KERRY DR 62T 76013 1900.2199 KINDLING CT 940 76016 5600.6699 I KENDAL OR 1240 76063 1400-1499 Arington Arington Mansfield KERRY LN 64C 76117 3000.3099 KINGS CIR "M 75067 500-M KENDER LN 73C 76108 81 OD-8699 Haltom City Lewisville White Settlement KERRY LN 620 76180 5700-5799 KING CT 79L 76112 5600-6799 KENDOLPH ST 346H 76201 900-1099 North Richland Hills S of 6700 E Lancaster Ave Denton 76205 I IOD-2399 KERRY LN /SA-Y 76020 700.1499 KING DR 63L 76022 IODM-129ON KENDRA LN 36E 78180 79004M Unincorporated Parker Carllyy Bedford MR 76022 50OW-79OW North Richland Hik KERRY RD IM 76020 700-1190 KING ST IOBF 76140 100-M ,1 KENILWORTHDR 109C 76017 3200.3299 Azle Evemyn Unincorporated...Parker KING ST 27M 76051 0001109 KENNLE 8T 76P 76107 1 190 I&A-Y 76020 1200.1409 Grapevine, N&S It 4600 Wast Frwy KERRY ST 870 76126 000909 KWG ST,E 119" 76026 100-190 KEN MICHAEL CT Sim 76180 4200-4499 Senbrook Burleson Nod Richland F11fft KESLER DR 94U 76017 49004M KING ST.NW 119A-A 76028 300399 I ' KENNEDALE ST 93T 76140 5400-5499 Arlington 7W17 5900.5999 Burleson 118Z 76028 500-800 Unincorporated Tarrant County KESSLER DR 41 R 76039 300 4M K I I9Ad1 76028 100-199 KENNEOALE-UTTLE SCHOOL RD Euless Budeson Kenvedale 188F 76060 100-1099 KESSLER RD 611.1 76114 4800-5299 KING ARTHUR CT SIP 76180 6400-6400 KENNEDALE-NEW HOPE RD River Oaks North Richland HIM 1106J 76060 37004299 KESWICK AVE BOR 76133 62004M KINGFISHER CT 34BY 75201 500-M N Ir 6500 Dick Prim Rd 107V 76140 4300.5099 S fr 3500 SW Loop 8W Denton KENNEDALE SUBLETT RO IOBC 760W 4900-SM KEVIN CT 109Z 76063 1-0g KINGFISHER LN 244Y IrMl 400409 Arlington Mansfield Denton 76201 3600-3509 Kenredals 106A 76060 300-1299 KEVIN OR SSR 76040 1-100 KING GEORGE DR "T 76112 400 M 108C 76050 5600.6M Euless W k 200 Woodhaven Blvd •See Detail Map 93 Ft.Worlih,I N4 i CONTINUED ON MAP 12 AN g ■ � � TUNIIENEEo 114 < HIGHLAND u HIGHLAND -- aJam" �cu • Nwwc BIdB . 'a m r � s C/RfSS RAINTIIEE C NUT COVE 4 GREENBOUGN 7 0.pt Roll NG N �13 h a BEND T0. a°Ce 114 e � H ' �7f o p u .. m ec �'r r Ci W m 4 /2 /LS JL6REENWI► •. Z LILAC SOUTH K O J c t� Q d p i zZ 5 RAINBOW Vn Cyt�S` £. Ou Ai110O�1DE �� .. pQ R OAKC S 4 8 ;� /2 k 21 , 6 � wART G 1tc `t v J° = l J'I' JL S T raU 2 SCALE IN MILES CONTINUED ON MAP 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 N Y� iB Vt DETAIL MAP SECTION 0 lobo 2000 3000 - WX PAGE 1026 STARTS ON INDEX PACE 157 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER s -94WI July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E., Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Abandonment of 0.432 Acre Portion of Drainage Easement in Southlake Crossing Southlake Market Place (Albertson's) has enclosed the TxDOT open channel with a box culvert. The box culvert contains the storm water flow between Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), east of Davis Boulevard to Davis Boulevard (F.M. 1938), south of Southlake Boulevard (see attached exhibit). The portion of the easement to be abandoned is the .432 acre area of open channel required to provide a slope from the top of the channel to the channel bottom. Public Works staff would recommend approval of the resolution concurring with the State's determination that the drainage easement is no longer necessary. A letter from TxDOT is attached. Please place this item on the August 2 Council Agenda for consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. B /lc ' Attachments: TxDOT concurrence resolution to abandon drainage easement c:1 wpfileslmemoslTxDOT.Dra 6A i JUL 29 '94 11:16AM kIIER & ASSOCIATES R,1 'r Texas Department of Transportation P.O. BOX 6868 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76115-0868 r(817) 370-6500 July 28, 1994 - Tarrant County F.M. 1709 & 1938 Tract 5-94 Southlake, Texas Nor. J. Rea Stevenson, P.E. Wier & Associates, Inc. 3908 South Freeway Fort Worth, Texas 76110-6398 Dear Mr. Stevenson: Enclosed is the resolution to be executed by the City of Southlake which will document the City's concurrence in the State's plan to convey the surplus drainage easement on Farm to Market Highway 1938. Next week we will forward the proposal to the Right-of-Way Division in Austin for review. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, 61 C. Carl Logan Property Manager An Equal Opporwrif y Employer (11W WIER & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING SURVEYING LAND PLANNING July 29, 1994 Mr. Curtis E. Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 817/481-5581 x702 RE: W&A #93021; SOUTHLAKE MARKET PLACE, Southlake, Texas. Dear Mr. Hawk: Enclosed is a copy of the concurrence resolution from the Texas Department of Transportation for abandonment of the excess drainage easement in Southlake Crossing. This portion of the easement is no longer needed since the channel has been contained in a box culvert. Please schedule this resolution for consideration by council as soon as possible. After you have obtained the signatures, please call me at 467-7700 so that I can pick up the resolution and have it delivered to the appropriate office of the Texas Department of Transportation. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, J. REA STEVENSON, P.E. Associate JRS:jrs/ckw Enclosure Copy of Resolution cc: John Drews JOHN P. WIER. P.E.. R.lVIC4-1.13 LANE 111. P.E.. R.P.L.S. As sOC1ATCs: J. REA STEVENSON. P.E. . RONALD W. COOMBS 4300 BELTWAY PLACE. SUITE 130 ARLINGTON. TEXAS 7601E-IO97 METRO I8171 467-7700 FAX 18171 46S-7482 3900 SOUTH FREEWAY FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76110.6398 IB 171 926-0212 FAX 48171 926-9347 RESOLUTION NO. CONCURRING IN THE STATE' S DETERMINATION THAT A PORTION OF THE STATE'S DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS NO LONGER NEEDED AS A ROAD AND THAT THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BE QUITCLAIMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE REGULATIONS. WHEREAS, the State - of Texas acquired and holds in its name a drainage easement on Farm to Market Highway 1938 as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, the State of Texas has determined that said drainage easement is no longer needed for the construction, maintenance and operation of Farm to Market Highway 1938, and WHEREAS, City Staff have studied the public need for said drainage easement and have determined that said drainage easement is no longer needed by the citizens as a road for public transportation purposes, and is not suitable for conservation, park, recreation and/or similar purposes. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: 1. That the StateeIs right-of-way shown on the attached Exhibit A is no longer needed by the citizens as a road and is not suitable for conservation, park, public transportation, recreation or similar purposes; 2. That the City of Southlake concurs in the State Is plan to dispose of the drainage easement in accordance with the established laws and regulations of the State of Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1994 . ATTEST: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS City Secretary Mayor of the City of Southlake �R TRACT 5-94 LEGAL DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE EASEMENT ABANDONMENT BEING 0. 432 acre tract of land located in the W. R. EAVES SURVEY, Abstract No. 500, Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of Block 1, Southlake Crossing, Phase I Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1613 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of a tract of land described in deed to-.Southlake Joint Venture, recorded in Volume 7675, Page 1133 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and also being a portion of a Drainage Easement according 'to the. deed recorded in Volume 9614 , Page 1733 of Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the West boundary line of said Block 1, Southlake Crossing, Phase I Addition and the East right- of-way line of Davis Boulevard (F.M. Road No. 1938, a variable width right-of-way) , lying N 00'18110011W, 147. 02 feet from the Southwest corner of Lot 1R, Block 1, Southlake Crossing, Phase I Addition; THENCE N 00°1810011W along the West boundary line of said Block 1 and the East right-of-way line of said Davis Boulevard (a variable width right-of-way) , 51.90 feet to a point; THENCE N 44 °42100"E, 49. 31 feet to a point; THENCE N 02°15118"E, 318.82 feet to a point in the West boundary line of said Block 1, Southlake Crossing, Phase I Addition, being the East right-of-way line of said Davis Boulevard (a variable width right-of-way) ; THENCE N 25°37149"E, 5. 08 feet to a point at the intersection of the East right-of-way line of said Davis Boulevard (a variable width right-of-way) and the Southeast right-of- way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. Road No. 1709, a 130 foot wide right-of-way) ; THENCE N 51°26'34"E, along the Southeast right-of-way line of said Southlake Boulevard (a 130 foot wide right-of-way) and the Northwest boundary line of said Block 1, 24 .95 feet to a point; THENCE S 08°33126"E, 196. 36 feet to the Beginning of a Curve to the Right; THENCE Southwesterly, 251. 33 feet along said Curve to the Right having a radius of 240. 00 feet, a central angle of 60*0010011 , and a chord bearing S 21'26134"W, 240. 00 feet to the End of said Curve; THENCE S 51°26134"W, 12 .98 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 0. 432 acre (18 , 806 square feet) of land. W&A ##93-021 5R_5_ July 26, 1994 i�N ' I r zoo) Ul II i o �o �r-� �A \\coD�-1 �� n r-iZ� r r ` A �v (fir -iNv p I AO• U 11 11 II Z • 1 D I �.(nQO, J� NO;cl- Illlllm O II v�-n.omo o rnr-N o"' o � III II g w 2 I � _ Z ' �?c n D Z I it 11 < �- � m -10,N R� II II D ``- -o An 0 � C N a _ I II _ .0 � -+ ; i o IN ( p -1 > N 0 � '�m ao I u w 12 7C ^' N -- r� I II AiOD ril v Z _ w' z ro w � CAIII M � N In a N I} _ < U) { 1 o O III0 D � v tp W Z a I UI N �°ii m ,a� NOII O A z I l -1 �Cl)-i > N w ti Nm C Ion0 ^O W. _ A I ti� �w �m o m ��, CA --� m-p W o ` W �CM� --�DZ x Rs 1 _ N p X _ tip" r'i� I?. N(aCD m -jZ' < D 61 om"vmp G) -01 � � • o�� ,�y � 0D0=` pD WZZ Nimb �D Ca t�1 o z !A O O X o m t City of Southlake,Texas am% MEMORANDUM July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: 1994-1995 Contract for Inspection Services provided by Tarrant County Health Department's Consumer Health Division The attached contract for inspection services provided by Tarrant County Health Department's Consumer Health Division, for the Fiscal Year 1994-95, is being presented for approval by the City Council. This contract contains no new fees, fee increases, or major program changes for the upcoming year. If you have comments please let me know and I will contact the Tarrant County Health Department. bom'. /s Q STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS the governing bodies of the parties herein finds the following agreement in the best interest of the citizens they serve and WHEREAS, Article 3, Section 64 of the Texas Constitution, and Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code authorize Counties and Cities in the State of Texas to contract with one another for the performance of various governmental functions and services,including those in the areas of public health and welfare;and WHEREAS, Tarrant County and the City of SOUTHLAKE pursuant to the Constitution and the laws of the State of Texas desire to make and enter into a contract whereby Tan-ant County will make available to the City of SOUTHLAKE Food Establishment and public swimming pool Inspection Program Services for the public health protection of its residents; NOW,THEREFORE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Tarrant County hereinafter called"County,"acting herein by and through Tom VandergrifT,duly authorized County Judge as directed by the Commissioners' Court of Tarrant County, and the City of SOUTHLAKE , a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "City" acting herein by and through GARY FICKES- , its duly authorized MAYOR ,do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. County hereby makes available to City for the protection of its residents Food Establishment and public swimming pool Inspection Program Services through the Tan-ant County Health Department 2. The Tarrant County Health Department will provide its services to all food establishments and public swimming pools located within the corporate limits of said City during the term of this agreemenC The said services shall consist of a food establishment and public swimming pool inspection program,certification of establishments for issuance of health permits, collection of fees, notification to City of violations of health ordinances, documentation of program activities within City in a quarterly report, and, where legally required by ordinance, approval of food establishment and pool managers and employee training,and certification. 3. The City agrees to maintain during the period of this agreement, ordinances which: adopt the current Texas Board of Health "Rules on Food Service Sanitation" and "Rules on Retail Food Store Sanitation"; designate the Director of the Tarrant County Health Department as Health Authority for the purposes of this agreement; to require all food establishments with corporate limits to maintain a valid health permit; adopt health permit fees of$150.00 annually for each food service and retail food establishment that engages in food preparation, 5100.00 annually for each retail food establishment that does not engage in food preparation, and $35.00 for each temporary food establishment; assign to the Tarrant County Health Department the authority to collect health permit fees directly from permit applicants; and, where not precluded by law,require food establishments to have certified managers and employees. 4. The City agrees to maintain during the period of this agreement, ordinances which: adopt the current Texas Minimum Standards of Sanitation and Health• Protection Measures, Title 5, Chapter 341, Subchapter D, Section 341.064 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, and Design Standards for Public Swimming Pool Construction, TAC, Chapter 337, Sections 337.71 through 337.96; to designate the Director of the Tarrant County Health Department as Health Authority for the purpose of this agreement ; to require all public swimming pools and spas within the corporate limits to maintain a valid public swimming pool permit ;to adopt public swimming pool permit fees of$100 annually for each public swimming pool and spa;to assign to the Tarrant County Health Department the authority to collect public swimming pool permit fees directly from permit applicants; and where not precluded by law, to require facilities to have certified pool managers. 5. The term of this agreement is for a period of one (1) year commencing on October 1, 1994, and ending on September 30, 1995, unless either the County or the Qity provides thirty (30) days written notice to the other that an amendment or termination is necessary.This contract is renewable by Tarrant County Commissioner's Court Order and approval by SOUTHLAKE city council This approval will be documented by a letter signed by both the County Commissioners and the City Council. 6. County is an independent contractor under the terms of this agreement and is not an officer, agent, servant, or employee of the City.The City shalll be responsible for enforcement of the City's health ordinances. 7. This contract is renewable by Tarrant County Commissioner's Court order and approval by city council. This approval will be documented by a letter signed by both the County Commissioners and the City Council. EXECUTED This day of , 1994 in Tan-ant County,Texas. CITY OF STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT By: By: Tom Vandergriff, County Judge Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALM: City Attorney County Legal Advisor Date: Date: ATTEST: By: 5Q -3 • 4 City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM l July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-66 Rezoning Request/Ordinance No.480-125 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for a 0.50 acre tract of land situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522 LOCATION: South of N. Peytonville Ave.,West of SouthRidge Lakes Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: Fred R. Joyce CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) RESPONSES: No written responses received P&Z ACTION: July 7, 1994; Approved(7-0) COUNCIL ACTION: July 19, 1994;Approved(7-0)First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-125 STAFF COMMENTS: The 30' strip is West of SouthRidge Lakes, Phase VII and will be purchased by Arvida and incorporated via a plat revision into SouthRidge Lakes Phase VII lots. Staff received the plat revision application on July 25, 1994. KPG/bls GAWPHJMEM0\cnsESV94-6&Z.WM �f it , ,;,•--� �:�� �. ,. M\1 . �► PA Elmo FAIR �a��«�1:. �� y,� •,y. gill jp:: id ;;�;, ��r.�► ■ III�© ������� . ►�=� �►� ���� ass© � IMP ���� � ,/ �, ���! � 1■ram%/■�■�L�. E ��-�- �• • .1'�i�i��1�� � ,/rim �►.-�"��'��� �1 ■• go��►� C , S5 CR e�8 2 202 e 9 i2 13 3 8 i0 11 I 202 > :a, 3 +el ++� TR. i i C CROSS TIMBER DR ++ lot 1" 100 + • let 112 4 "SF-1A" "SF-1A" x 10 9 8 7 A 6 « 5 12 H. Hoven G. Jones C. Pagel 1 i tll l,o 275 l21 I N0 170 e0166 TR.2B1 �,y 13'C i AC S(�_V G 24e "RE" ENC B TR.284C i 63 Ac K. Ledbetter 12 1 AC Arvida TR.285 A s.i l i @ Southwind Partners `336 `l ..— _. _ TR.282 4• TR2B5A 9.43 Ac 1 TR.2B4E .249 @ 2 1.43 AC City of Southlake "SF-20A" TR_11C: »+ .5 AC 2,0 "RE" K. Ledbetter TRH i 1c. TR2B6 TR.28 .5 Ac .038@ 2.082 @ N zoo ^ soe S00 N K. Ledbetter TR.2C 10 I TR. i iC! O1 .037 @ 9 Ac 296 613 "AG" TR2C101A TR.2C1 4 .076 @ TR.2C 101 "AG" 4.49 Ac lozo 3. 104 @ Fred Joyce Fred Joyce 1t1 649 ,00 126 ,33 soo I TR.1 1 A' y 2R = 22.251 90 _ gq 95 91 92 A 93 :•e J �' e, ADJACENT OWNERS iB corvcI AND ZONING 'q h 20.0 88 , " 87 50 r 1 49 I TR. 11A1. AC MN .588 @ "+ 79 86 '•• •s 78 2j2 r an _ ��85 - CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS' ORDINANCE NO. 480-125 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 0.50 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE A.A.FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.522, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED. IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "SF-20A" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG"Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise G:XORDWNNGN480.125 Page l producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed and amended as shown and described below: GAORMzormacuso.►u Page 2 1�i Being a 0.50 acre tract of land situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A attached hereto and incorporated herein, from"AG" Agricultural to "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified,and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined riot more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court GAORMZONWGV80.125 Page 3 or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G.'0RDI=NWGN80.125 Page 4 74- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: GAORD=NWGIAso.125 Page 5 • EXHIBIT"A" y Being a 0.50 acre tract of land located in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract 522, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being part of a tract of land recorded in Volume 4936, page 355, deed records of Tarrant County, Texas, which 0.50 acres of land is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of lot 1 of the A.A. Freeman No. 522 an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 'A' , Slide #1461, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 05 seconds West for a distance of 729.70 feet to a point; Thence North 88 degrees 59 minutes 26 seconds East for a distance of 30 feet to a point; Thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 05 seconds West for a distance of 729.70 feet to a point; Thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 10 seconds West for a distance of 30 feet to the point of Beginning containing 0 .50 acres. o:DRD7X*wM48Q.is Page 6 t / � CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-134 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 30.4315 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE T.M. HOOD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 706, TRACT 9B, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO"CS"COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FO PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; D PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the i a ome rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG"Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise GAORMZONING\480-134 Page I producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in (W zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed and amended as shown and described below: G:\ORMZONING\480-134 Page 2 Being a 30.4315 acre tract of land situated in the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, Tract 9B, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural to "CS" Community Service District, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to G:\ORD\ZON ING\480-134 Page 3 such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: (W CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY GAORMZONINM480-134 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: GAORDVONING1480-134 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" UE1NG a portion of The T. M. 11000 SURVEY, Abstract 006, in 'racrant County, Te`XaS, and being That same -tract of land conveyed to JOitn L. Clow by deed recorded in Volume: 3966, Page 107, Deed Records, Tarrant Counly. texas, dt-scribed by metes and bounds as follows. AEGINNLNG at the South base of an old railroad 'tie- fence corner. the Southeast corner of said Ctow tract , by deed ca11 iii feet North and 1650 fret mast from the Southeast corner of said Hood Survey; • TitemcE Hest , gene-rally with an old wice- fence, at 962.2 feet a 1/2 inch iron 0.5 fret. East and 0.4 fret South of an old ealroad t i�• fence corner, in the East Line• of Shady Oaks Road, in r.11 1006.20 feet to a paint in the- ce•nrec of said road; THENCE North 00 degrees-53 minutes-31 seconds east , wills said toad. t336.52 fe•el .- T11tNCF, South 69 descees-23 minutes-36 se-conds East .' at 24 .0 feel' a 5/6 inch iron 1 fool :1c.rth of an OLu railroad t it• fe•ncc• corner. to thc, Earl line• of said road, con( inuing, generally with on old wire fence:, In all. 985.44 fret ro an old rairoetd t-Le fence- coene•r; Ti VWX South, gvneraLly will, an old Wier fence. 1325.92 fret In the POiN'r OF OEGLNNiNG and cnntbining 30.4315 acres of Land. c:toRoWHwcueo-tK Page 6 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM , July 29 , 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-68 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Carroll ISD/Ordinance No. 480-134 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for a 30.4315 acre tract of land situated in the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, Tract 9B LOCATION: East side of Shady Oaks Dr., South of W. Highland St. OWNERIAPPLICANT: Carroll Independent School District CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "CS" Community Service District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen (14) RESPONSES: Four written responses received outside the 200'notification area: * Robin Jones, SPIN Representative Area #11, opposed; expressed traffic and safety concerns for children going to and from school on Shady Oaks Dr. Unless sidewalks are provided, this request will be vehemently opposed. * Carita A. Weaver, 1009 Brazos Dr., opposed; wants sidewalks provided for the children's safety. * Kathryn M. Marckesano, 705 Kleberg Ct.,opposed; has safety concerns for children, wants to see safe walkways for students. *Gary Fawks,330 Ravenaux,opposed;the current poor condition of roads leading to schools needs to be addressed before more schools are so badly planned. P&Z ACTION: July 7, 1994;Approved(7-0)subject to the Plan Review Summary dated July 1, 1994,eliminating item#10 requiring the continuation of Chapel Downs Drive; limiting access to three curb cuts and work with staff to address site limitations due to grade differential at south bus lane and the driveway across the street; no lights on the proposed playing fields; and work with city on traffic/road improvements and sidewalks along frontage. City of Southlake,Texas . i COUNCIL ACTION: July 19, 1994; Approved (7-0) First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-134, subject to second Plan Review Summary dated July 15, 1994 eliminating item #3 requirement for the continuation of Chapel Downs West through this site to Shady Oaks; adding requirement of sidewalks along Shady Oaks Drive; and granting waiver of bufferyard and interior landscape requirements until two years after issuance of certificate of occupancy ("C.O."). This site is the proposed location of the new combined elementary and intermediate school. STAFF COMMENTS: City staff met with C.I.S.D. officials and their consultants on Thursday afternoon. The recommended changes will be implemented and submitted to the City staff on Monday afternoon during another joint meeting. It is anticipated that the school district will submit their final concept plan to the City Council during Tuesday night's meeting. KPG/bls GAWPRMEM0\CASES\94-68-ZC.W PD a V / ia1 ILA r� .,� 11111/��►.��� /N moll/ �1 ►.��++� r L \� I I «1' I« � IN t M I� •N ." HIGHLAND STREET I« N. \ W .w N •w TR 8A4 TR BA4Af} 51 AC TR BA5 69 0 ua w II I TR I I All Surrounding Properties are Zoned "AG" with the exception of the B. Yetman property which is zoned "SF-IA". J.Chow ;TR 8A8 ... 1.39 e j 14.1 AC) x TR 8A3 x� 1.50 AC) 1.5 AC _I " w. J.Ramsey SF-IA" B.Goodson TR BA:S B.Yetman TR 8A2 3. 2.54 AC t 1.5 AC G.Davidson TR BA9 ••• H .73 0 TR BA1 =� B.Runyan .. N. .. J.Clow T.H.Kasper �y I i � J.Clow I O TR 1 3 .0 AC `J N�EY • S P-106 m N m 0 Cr A.Johnson Wa 11A3 '"•s AC 1 U TR 11A3A .5 AC - •'• TR 13A x "' H.Scherer TR 1312A ` TR 9F c it SO s0 a S.Skelton Mike Sandlin Homes Wendy and Steve .« .« pobinson TR 11A2 .. C.Austin 1.0 AC (� / e 28 c .: TR 9E l \ TR 9 « l l_ - ' r 9.65 AC _ 85H4- 82T, ADJACENT OWNERS27LlANO CTT' AND ZONING26B Ao r 1 5 4.63 AC : 2s7e 781 00 6g 1�.974 e) M w#V 1«M&%M gwodoo MU 481'f10t!l�VJ ' "*"Wn to MINA—1-O"QK � A�o83l4aae�s}sllg�l sl�lal lelset� CY7 -100N32 HIMC 1 UMM-MYUGvtm g MGM OLLVW3H08IT I ` to OL•9001 __ •1 M �'�� S � 4 L_.. �L •$. l IIJ i l .aav ne of nl�i GaQOV LL. a 1 ' S J 1 1 _ 1 \ m / / Aota PCs 0 1 If �. W% Ao�?Vl� a_08YAtl7Jlf10 .Ol City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-77 Preliminary Plat/Carroll I.S.D.,Shady Oaks Elementary Addition REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat of Carroll I.S.D., Shady Oaks Elementary Addition, Lot 1 Block 1, being 30.431 acres situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706,being Tract 9B LOCATION: East side of Shady Oaks Dr., South of W. Highland St. OWNER: Carroll Independent School District APPLICANT: Cheatham& Associates CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "CS" Community Service District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen(14) RESPONSES: One written response received within the 200' notification area: * Koba H. Skelton,587 Shady Oaks,opposed;tremendous increase in traffic;noise during the week and baseball/soccer fields create weekend traffic, noise and lights; entrance right-of-way is too close to residences; and he is concerned with drainage. One written response received outside the 200' notification area: * Larry K. Abernathy, 640 Truelove Tr., opposed; his concerns are that the extension of W. Chapel Downs Dr. is unnecessary and dangerous, and would cause increased traffic and speeding cars. P&Z ACTION: July 21, 1994; Approved 6-0 subject to the Plat Review Summary dated July 15, 1994 deleting item #9 requiring the continuation of Chapel Downs West through this site to Shady Oaks. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plat Review Summary dated July 15, 1994 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached second Plat Review Summary dated July 29, 1994. 4 4 ` City of Southlake,Texas Note the attached letter from C.I.S.D. Superintendent, Bill Branum ;requesting that W. Chapel Downs not be extended through the site to Shady Oaks Drive. KPG/bls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES\94-77-PP.WPD ' IA . . JUL-15-U4 hKl U;eb UHKKULL 150 1'HA KU. 4L1UtS1U C.UG C,ARROLL INDEFENDENrT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1201 N.CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE.TEXAS 76092 • (8171.4$1-6775 U 66 G1CvF_JOHNSON WILLIAM R.BRANUM EXECUnVEDIRECTOROFSPECIA6SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL MURPHY 'Y R 00 P9 HOUSE K OIRECTOROvtANCUILlClMCES ASSISTANT SUPERUiTCNGElIVOURRI"'JM s .ta M+N .a. t "Meart of the Go(den Tr angle" June 17, 1994 Mayor Gary Fickes and Council Members City of Southlake 667 No. Carroll Ave. Southlake,TX 76092 Dear Mayor Fickes and Council Members: It has recently been called to my attention that,originally, a road was planned to be developed under the Sandlin Estates Plat to extend through property awned by Carroll Independent School District for the purposes of developing an elementary and intermediate school. A portion of this property is also earmarked for school/community joint utilization regarding soccer practice fields, etc. I respectfully request that you understand we were not involved in the original decision-making process. Furthermore, we do not plan to build a road through our property on Shady Oaks. I request that you delete the stub out as originally projected. It is essential that we have the entire 30 acres to utilize for educational and joint- use purposes. Thank you very much for your attention to this request. Please let me know if I need to do anything further in this regard. Sincerely, William R. Branum RECEIVED a'o: The His Honor Mayor C=ickes and the members of the City Council, c, y 61 4 1994 l Southlake. J CITY SECRETARY Prom: Members of the OAK HILL ESTATES Homeowners Association, and residents of that neighborhood. Re: West Chapel Downs Dr. and the possible extension of that road westward to Shady Oaks Dr. Ladies and Gentlemen: As residents of Oak Hill Estates we are concerned about the possibility of the extension of W. Chapel Downs through our neighborhood and on to Shady Oaks Dr. to the west. We are opposed to any extension of this road for the following reasons: i. This extension is unnecessary, considering the expansion of Southlake Blvd., a 5 lane road less than a mile away. 2. It is dangerous, given the nature of our neighborhood. We are a small neighborhood with families, children on bicycles and baby strollers. A secondary thoroughfare here would unsafe for all. 3. As W. Chapel Downs passes our homes it rises sharply, and a setting afternoon sun virtually eliminates the possibility of a driver seeing all possible hazards ahead. 4. The construction of a new school near the end or W. Chapel Downs would significant increase traffic through our neighborhood. 1 5. W. Chapel Downs, as a straight through street, would be an open J invitation to high-speed drivers realizing that police do not often patrol secondary roads. 6. City Council agreed last year to a modification of the thoroughfare plan (calling for W. Chapel Downs to turn before it reached Shady Oaks) which address these concerns. Many residents bought homes here with the understanding that that change was permanent. We, the undersigned, respectfully request that the City Council take steps to insure that Thoroughfare plan for the City of Southlake be modified permanently to indicate that W. Chapel Downs will not be a "secondary thoroughfare." We request that no action be taken to cause the extension of this road to Shady Oaks. Larry K. Abernathy, Secretary, Oak Hill Estates Homeowners Association 640 Truelove Tr. Southlake, TX 488-3759 Name Address -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------______--_ .• r.:.���- —tom r.a_.p(taw. p 7'� fs-3 7S NOTG: - `/ 1 i.tS `�.�- •s C r c_i,�a�' r.t iv., eat f` Jill logo -WIR -`� a�� .\. ,, ©© .. • ii ;fir ...• ;• • • .. � r �'t'+fit � !i�� ..�� - - - -- -- WON woe for 'may ����r'' r1 �''� ���III��I� � �� � �� An �, ��v , , • a 141 SO ,W,qw IWNF R A Q rpt —MOM i!mp 11!1 TWY-0— lit 34 Ic 16% TRACT MAP Amol I PAP -doom RN i I\�.\ I •w I w n� w � �.a r ii w HIGHLANO STkEET • TR BA4 \\ TR BA4A 6 .51 AC � '` ,TR 8A5 .69 0 TR I 1 All Surrounding Properties are Zoned "AG" with the exception of the B. Yetman property which is zoned "SF-1A". J.Clow 3 TR BAB I - 1.39 (4.4 AC) t TR BA3 xi (.50 AC) 1.5 AC .� "SF-1 A" J.Ramsey B.Goodson TR BA:5 B.Yetman TR BA2 ;. ° 2.54 AC i 1.5 AC G.Davidson TR BA9 .73 @ TR BA1 B.Runyan J.Clow T.H.Kasper (iw I � I � J.Clow I TR 3 .o AC N EY • SA_10 • m N \ (n O Cr A.Johnson TR 11A3 .5 AC 1 V TR 11A3A�RA •� " H.Scherer TR I IA2A TR 9F Mike Sandiin Homes 10 50 0 = _ R.Gragg S.Skelton TR 1'A2 C.Austin ..: TR 9E J TR 9 7 7 9.65 AC �• 27 B5 B4_ B3 ' T� .ADJACENT 82 OWNERS _ — — — — t_lANO CT iT' AND ZONING6 B G poor 1 R 4.63 AC £ t? n2.5 2 3 78 7! e� 81 00 686q��55.974 @ T — • City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 94-77 Review No: 1Q Date of Review: 07/29/94 Project Name: Preliminary Plat-Carroll ISD No 1 Addition(Carroll ISD Shady Oaks Elementary Addition) OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: Carroll ISD Cheatham&Associates 1100 N. Carroll Ave. 1601 E.Lamar Blvd. Southlake,TX 76092 Suite 200 Arlington,TX 76011 Phone: (817)481-5775 Phone: (817) 548-0696 Fax: Fax: (817)265-8532 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 070/94 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT TOM ELGIN AT(817)481-5581,EXT.753. 1. Label the property to the southeast as "Approved Final Plat, Sandlin Estates" and show proposed R.O.W.reservation for the continuation of Chapel Downs Drive West.The thoroughfare plan requires the continuation of Chapel Downs West from the Sandlin Estates property through this site to Shady Oaks. 2. Show and label any drainage easements for proposed drainage improvements. * At the time of the review of this preliminary plat, a traffic study had not been received. Additional R.O.W. dedication along Shady Oaks may be required at the time of the final plat. * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider off-site sewer extensions and off-site grade-to-drain permission. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Carroll ISD Cheatham&Associates . i ' $ g 1191 i fit tits�1 �1 it all V �E3 d6'Tifl 3 ,AO.00AO T----------------- O N �I 11 11 w II pp C is City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-69 City Initiated Rezoning/Ordinance No.480-135 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of a 4.7 acre tract of land and a 4.742 acre tract of land situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey,Abstract No. 18, Tracts 6C4 and portions of Tracts 6F 1 and 6F IA. LOCATION: North side of Union Church (W. Continental Blvd.), approximately 600'West of Davis Blvd. APPLICANT: City of Southlake CURRENT ZONING: "I-I" Light Industrial District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-IA" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential/100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Fifteen (15) RESPONSES: Six written responses received within the 200'notification area: *Jerry Summy,Pastor of Northeast Baptist Church,9009 Davis Blvd., in favor; would prefer houses rather than businesses to adjoin the church property. * William H. Lippincott, 820 N. Shady Oak Dr., opposed; requested explanation of why his property is being rezoned back to SF-IA and for what reason does this need to be done? *Leslie Hughes, 8809 Davis Blvd., opposed; said that new single- family residents will complain about the existing businesses in the area. * Mark Stanfield,H&S Properties, 8809 Davis Blvd., Keller,opposed; for the same reasons as Leslie Hughes. * Morris &Billie Farmer, 684 Davis Blvd. in favor. * Opal White, 900 Davis Blvd. in favor. Three written responses received outside the 200' notification area: * A.W. &June Haney,4W Brock, in favor. * Perry & Vera Vargas, 209 Brock, in favor. * B.J. and Mary Couch, 2535 Union Church, in favor. City of Southlake,Texas One verbal response received(owner within 200' notification area): * Thomas Poteet, 6700 McCoy Dr., Ft. Worth,opposed. P&Z ACTION: July 7, 1994; Approved(7-0) COUNCIL ACTION: July 19, 1994; Approved(7-0) First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-135 STAFF COMMENTS: The City is seeking to rezone this property to insure compliance with its Land Use Plan. There is no established industrial use or industrial structure on this land. KPG/bls GAWPRMEM0\CASES\94-69-Z.WPD 17 lp -� a E-31 Mal WE J. FREI NO IN �i ON iMims �� ,A _..:, �- .III!!■ k;J • fir — •,r r. — _i;��� 1:� • E3 all ��u ��• ■ e5r err I I l a .1v !I(:;; L ooz oor tat — -- — — — 6T6 _OS_I _TlOddd3 - - — L06 OSI 89-1-19>1 -8E'61 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -sa On18 7 a<r U Z cvr ,r < c U a 1� a < a h to .. T CCv L to L U acr Q ^ L m .-. O to N N U = N U N tD I Q CNA 4c N Q R o o t(D o �� I ~ �� Z7 °C m r L N 1' N �— N C ^ d (/) I E to Z I .. Cl) C ¢ Z N cw > ~ Ucc 1-- N cc c v� w O O r a d a z3 _ Y W �Y' L z CD ca Cn� p b o ,� z I NQ C.) _ v O z d p �. c co U' a. 1 V— w Cl z to c I p > Uewde43 •W Q o� W.Q = nafifie8 .3 •n. O ¢ m CL —,�.- - - N ~ ^ I c`cafifieg •Q CD m o.. O a rn c • - ca o O Q ` i E � CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-135 N ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING A 4.7 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND A 4.742 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE JESSE G. ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 18, TRACTS 6C4 AND PORTIONS OF TRACTS 6F1 AND 6F1A,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "I-I" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO "SF-lA" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILrrY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF, PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHERE , outhlake, To i ing under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI,Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings,other structures and land for business, industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "I-l" Light Industrial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City has initiated an application on said property to rezone same in accordance with the City's Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these GAORD70NW6\480-135 Page l (� changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading,spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the'promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed and amended as shown and described below: GAORMZONING 4RO-135 Page 2 (D- (i Being a 4.7 acre tract of land and a 4.742 acre tract of landsituated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey,Abstract No. 18,Tracts 6C4 and portions of Tracts 6F1 and 6F1A, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "I-1" Light Industrial District to "SF-IA" Single-Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances GAORMZONINGA480-135 Page 3 affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G:\ORD\ZONING\480-135 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Q%0RD\Z0NWG\4Wl35 Page 5 7D-� EXHIBIT"A" TRACT A 9EING a tract of land out of the JESSE G. ALLEN SURVEY. Tarrant County. Texas, being described as follows BEGINNING at an iron pin in the South tine of the Jesse G. Allen Surver, said point being 573.8 feet Nest of the Southeast corner of said survey and in the North R.O.N. line of County Road No. 4099s THENCE Hest along said R.O.W. line 465.5 feet to an iron pin for corners TIIEM= North 0 degrees 34 minutes East along fence line 44Q.0 feet to an iron pin for eornere THENCE East along fence line 465.5 feet to an iron pin for corners TIMICE South O degrees 34 minutes West 440.0 feet to the place of BEGINNING and CONTAINING 4.7 acres of land. TRACT B e BEING 4�aeres of land Out of the JESSIE G. AUIN SURREY. Abatroet No. l8, _1n• Tarrant County. Texas. and described by metes and bounds as foll—: 80GIMU43 at an iron pin 440.0 feet North and 728.0 feet west from the Southeast corner of said Jessie G. Allen Survey, said point being in the South line ot'tlnnt certain tract conveyed to H. P. white by deed recorded in Voluee 1850,,Paga'PC2, Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas; THENM North 89 degrees-30 minutes west, along fence line and South 11m of Nhiia tract, 486.20 feet to iron pin for corners THENZE North 00 degrees-06 minutes-58 seconds West, 448.26 feet to iron pin-for- corners TMMM South 89 degrees-35 minutes-03 seconds East. 317.23 feet to an iron for corner: THENCE South 01 degrees-51 minutes-11 seconds West, 125.21 feet to-an Iron pig for corinec r THEICE South 89 degrees-23 minutes-12 seconds East, 234.69 feet town snot pih-- for corner; T102CE South 10 degrees-44 minutes-36 seconds West. 328.21 feet to the Potwar BMINNING and containing 4.742 aces of land. G.40RDVAMM+O-u5 Page 6 `lo -to 4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM, July 29 , 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-70 City Initiated Rezoning/Ordinance No.480-1366,,, REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 9.836 acres,being three (3) tracts of land out of the R.P. Estes Subdivision situated in the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107 LOCATION: East side of Sam School Road approximately 800'North of West Dove Road APPLICANT: City of Southlake CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District REQUESTED ZONING: "AG" Agricultural LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine(9) RESPONSES: No written responses received P&Z ACTION: July 7, 1994; Approved(7-0) COUNCIL ACTION: July 19, 1994;Approved(6-0-1)First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-136 STAFF COMMENTS: The City is seeking to rezone this property to "AG" rather than commercial or residential due to its close proximity to the MTP-IBM joint venture developments. IBM is currently the sole owner of the subject property. No industrial use or structure is established on this property. ht--- KPG/bls gAWP1\MEM0\CASES\94-70-Z.WPF t OMENS WIN e ..� BM� ■ A A • I - lD 6') . f� m Q tF- In U _ a Q'. ti a: it U Q m U m< U ~ 'Q ao m a m Q N i Q ¢ N - CD I N O m CL In c W 7 Nam, L I � I L • U') m W to to a �G ♦n 2 N co m Q Z O z Zoo O 0 z N cca Z� — m V 1 Q � o I 1 � a 0 I v O (V 'aO N I N m (pi� acn m 1 ' O I I N L I I ar II Ob �00HOS WVS n m C .0 � U 3 ��ryyyW��� m a m Q NmU � N Q S Ol co .Q Q Q R C� t�N cn tZ N A �a ao -_ J _ = oo=_ a co 1 Q tn t-n m IC)Q Q 009 T ~' m Q ¢nCO v 4 ¢mr v < � m � OLL v Q << o CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-136 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CONSISTING OF 9.836 ACRES, BEING THREE (3) TRACTS OF LAND OUT OF THE R.P. ESTES SUBDIVISION SITUATED IN THE T.W. MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1107, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "I-V LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO "AG" AGRICULTURAL, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "I-1" Light Industrial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City has initiated an application on said property to rezone same in accordance with the City's Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the G:W RMONRd4148o-13C, Page I u facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of.the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL,OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: G:\ORMONRJG 480-136 Page 2 9.836 acres,being three(3) tracts of land out of the R.P. Estes Subdivision situated in the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "I-I" Light Industrial District to "AG" Agricultural. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court GAORDWNwc480-136 Page 3 7C-S or not, under such ordinances,same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted j until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance,and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as-required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its..passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY GAMD=NO GW80-136 Page 4 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: GA0RD=NU4GU -136 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A Tract 1: BEGINNING at an Icon pl" at lite Southeast corner of said Tract 4: THENCE N. 86' - 54' - 16" W. 496.15 feet along the South tine of said Tract 4 to an iron pin in ssueo said pout being the Southeast corner of a tract described in a dead to Norman L. and Mary Franks. of record is Volume 8227t,. Page 2266. Deed Records. Tarrant County. Texas$ THENCE N. 0' - 02' - 43" W. 186.0 feet along the East time of the last referenced tract to an iron pin at the Northeast corner of same; THENCE N. 68' - SS' - 20" W. 239.90 feet along the North ties of the last referenced tract to an Iron pin at the Northwest corner of same: THENCE S. 0' - 02' - 43" E. along the West line of the last referenced tract 85.93 feet to an iron pin in •seep sold point being the Northeast corner of a tract described'in a deed to Billy J. and Linda Nelson. of record to Volume 6227. Page 2279. Deed Records. Tarrant County. Tesasl THENCE N. 88' - 54' - 16" W. 399.89 feet along the North time of the last referenced tract to an iron pin at the Northwest corner of some; THENCE S. 0' - 02' - 43" E. along the West line of the last referenced tract 100.0 feet to an iron pia it thb Southwest corner of some in the South line of Tract 4. above referenced: THENCE N. 88' - 54' - 16" W. 169.73 feet to am iron pin at the Southwest corner of said Tract 4. In the apparent East R.O.W. tine of Peytonvitle Sam School Road, THENCE North 328.73 feet ^tong snld R.O.W. line to as iron pia in some for corner; THENCE S. 88' - 55' - t9" E. along the North tine of said Tract 4. 1299.96 feet to an iron pin at the Northeast corner of same; THENCE S. 0' - 59' - 31" E. 329.29 feet along the East line of said Tract 4. to the POINT OF BEGINNING and eontataimg 7.694 acres. Tract 2: BEGINNING at as icon pin [It the South Line of sold Tract 4. said point being 1i. 88' - 54' - l6" W. 496.15 feet from the Southeast corner of said Tract 4; THENCE N. 88' - 54' - 16" W. 239.90 feat along -said South lias to so iron pin in some for corner; THENCE H. 0' - 02' - 43" W. t85.93 feet to on icon pin for corner; THENCE S. 88' - 55' - 20" E. 239.90 feet to ah iron-pin for''Corner: THENCE S. 0' - 02' - 43" E. 186.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.024 acres. GiORMONINGU80.136 Page 6 EXHIBIT"A" 15Cact 3• BEGINNING at an tru" pin in the South tine of said Tract 4. said point being S. 68' - 54' - 16" E. 169.73 feet fro■ the Southwest corner of said Tract 4; THENCE N. 0' -AV - 43" V. LOO.0 feet to an Leon pia for corner= TNBNCE S. 88' - 54' - 16" C. 399.89 feet to an iron pin for corner to the Vest Line of the tract described in•a deed to Norman L. and Mary Freaks of record in Volume 8227q fate 2268. Deed Records. Tarrant County. Texas= THENCE S. 0' - 02' - 43" E. 100.0 feet along said Vest line to an Leon pin at the Southwest corner of the last referenced tract to the South line of said Tract 41 THENCE N. 68' 54' - 16" V. 399.89 feet along the South time of said Tract 4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing MIS acres. C:W1UD=NU4G%U0-136 Page 7 (nA' 7E t City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-73 Rezoning Request/Ordinance No.480-140 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of a 15.534 acre tract of land situated in the H. Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, being legally described as Lot 2R, H. Granberry No. 581 Addition LOCATION: West side of S. White Chapel Blvd. approximately 1/4 mile North of Continental Blvd. at 720 S. White Chapel Blvd. OWNER/APPLICANT: Lemoine Wright CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "RE" Single-Family Residential Estate LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Nine(9) RESPONSES: Two written responses received within the 200' notification area: * Marzio Zanaboni, 811 S.White Chapel Road,undecided about. *Bill Casner, 1381 Lakeview,not opposed,however, he is concerned about the future impact this proposed rezoning will have on his property to the North. P&Z ACTION: July 21, 1994; Approved(5-0-1) fW1 KPG/bls QW GAWPF\h EM0\CASES\94-73-Z.WPD 1p`���i1111�■1�1�w��/; ■■■.■■■Itlt�iiii gill `�■ WAUlaw wn-v I��II��I :� :,� ■■�//�■■■: . �■�■I��w �' �; psi© _.Rr�;W_�� OIL . � ■� �■ ��\■I■ . � .�'ii'w�lot .� MA Min all � �� 3110. _ =� ■'fir■ ■ SWE .•R�� ,WAS. �■� ��' ■� ��� - �lii►�,II .� ����, ter'/'- N■�,',�;.."�� � ��:.� W,!,Am oil Vi _���� �■��■� � .ram■-., �^ iii■J� .raj. IF mom T U 0 a is a s 3 a Q ¢ o 111 co '[ m t- a .[1 � ¢ . R 0 mcr O C C U N C C'3 N N W m O C7 > to w m N d Ct� 910E 'Od '00 W. y � d K LT. b U ♦w tt« �t .�`. 11^t'" M.l. t)1.►) —yam tt.M •).. ..OP•t' U.« "am r t..« a• ,t qi tst« �� s-. M .t� U - ~ �•1 O w �. IR f4•aZR ! LU _ CF z a C �< ` r N' O '� • �f � •• a4 U R ¢m Q cc � 1 0� t 1W � k (a ¢(D cm C: dl , n I CL E 1 li ot�R a e . �_ ~ - �" N MM73 - ww r.« ..�• LV 0 q $ A .em'.r. nue ixa l j �CC a a . tl• Q r I[ w[ � ✓ s..sYaY[ a3 ` r.. nt.« ..mi I � • C t..w. ,e.ta � o n 1 8 M «.�cr - T.a[4= cu it, / v cr ul cc cc cc �._. i O1 M / �-. •V O TINB£filAKEC,, / N � \ CY Alr, •• a ! \ N N 4� 'O N J U) \ r L cmG�ENeA00K CT co CD N m E N m N m r, v v • N ¢ 01 ¢ 01 r m cu N m •)• r N _ v v x 3 • m N •, tn V CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-140 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS BEIN AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "All FROM _ TO 4a a" a SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business,industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as , 0 V , Y under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these GA0RD\Z0N1NQ480.I40 Page l SA— �i 1 changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust;effect on the'promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, 1 WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and,has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed and amended as shown and described below: O:\0RD\Z0NIN41480.140 Page 2 SA-5 Bein acre tract of land,situated in the d more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any pother ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court GAORD70NMM480.140 Page 3 or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G A0RD\ZONnV(A480.l40 Page 4 8a APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Page 5 apt- EXMIT"A" i WHOCAS. LEMOM WR04T a the owner of a 15534 ocre tract of land n the K Granberry Survey. Abstract No:SM situated n the Cityy�o� f Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas and bent' that ct tra desorbed 'n deed recorded n Vol 9963. PS 300 of the Deed Records of Torrent County. Texas and being more portuct" described as folows: BEGMNG at a V2" ran pn found at the Northwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Verna Now by deed recorded in Vol 4638. Pgg.� 60 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas. said pin berg E berg by deed col N 00' 682Aeet from the Southwest corner of the sold Granberry Survey. sad Pinalso being the Southwest corner of the herein described tract of brad: THENCE N 00'42'4r E. 97.40 feet a V2- ran pp+nn found at the Southwest owner of a tract of land conveyed to Wiliam Cosner by deed recorded in VoL 7263. Pg. 1943 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas, said pin also being the Northwest corner of the herem described tract. THENCE S 89*0825' E abng the South " of the sad Casner tract. 631.27 feet to a V2- iron pn found. Pin being near the Eastern edge of pavement of County Road No. 3016 (South White Chapel ordk THENCE S 00'1014' W ger coly donq the sad Eastern edge of pavement. 497.39 feet to a V2" n,ran pin fau said pin sd o being the'Northeast corner of the sad Ftkw tract. THENCE WEST along the North One of sad Fulmer tract. 133606 feet to the PONT OF BEGMNG and conto" 677.489 square feet or 15534 acres of land with 0.635 acres being dedicated for right-of-way. leavvq a net acreage of K.899 ocres. GAORD%ZON04G%480.140 Page 6 Q O7� ^ f City of Southlake,Texas M .MORANDUM July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk,City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-76 Plat Showing REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Showing of Lot 1 and Lot 2,Thomas M. Hood No. 706 Addition, being 6.09 acres situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706,being Tracts 3B2, 3F, and 1106 LOCATION: East of North Peytonville Ave.,West of Shady Oaks Drive and South of West Dove St. OWNERS: Kathleen L. Sumner and F.L. Bailey APPLICANT: Don Blackburn CURRENT ZONING: "SF-lA" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine(9) RESPONSES: One written response received within the 200' notification area: * Don J. Weeks, 1325 N. Peytonville Ave., opposed. P&Z ACTION: July 21, 1994; Approved (6-0) subject to the Plat Review Summary dated July 15, 1994 deleting item#3 requirement of R.O.W.dedication at the southeast corner for possible extension of West Highland St. West to North Peytonville Ave. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plat Review Summary dated July 15, 1994 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached second Plat Review Summary dated July 29, 1994. KPG/bls GAWPF\MEM0\CASES\94-76-PS.WPD $ t �ili ©■�t� BONERAMS p;j ;_ � , • vw oil mill 11 ON WIN N51311Ili�r�� ��, �. ► 1�•��ice.• ������� � . ;';� •• fib � � ��-vim �• �!� � � �,► law. ,� � R J • c%l l o I i j o coo Q fig = I .[[ \ I .{C Oct W cc z C7 N c � z -- m N LL m U 0 z Y w m Q Ql M C 0 - m � I— N N !�:z m ^ - LL V 0 m z as m o a a Q u U cn m m U ccccO . N VY Q 3nv 31-IIANOIA3d ui (6 a C m a N V N _ - rt LJ_ 0 z Y @1 Q tn tl. ..{ ca cno '� d0 83SWII SS080 -� • = L. «L :cr co a `[ _ co °' 16L 3 • w • �* l HOPJiA � M Hnnr.� � 0 ���� 1 City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 94-76 Review No: TWO Date of Review: 07/29/94 Project Name: Plat Showing-Lots 1& 2.T. Hood No. 706 Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: F.L.Bailey Kathleen Sumner Ward Surveying Company 1125 N. Peytonville Avenue 1205 N. Peytonville Avenue P.O. Box 820253 Southlake,Texas 76092 Southlake,Texas 76092 Fort Worth,TX 76182-0253 PHONE: (817)488-0328 PHONE: PHONE: (817)281-5411 FAX: FAX: FAX: (817) 838-7093 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON (7/27/94 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT TOM ELGIN AT(817)481-5581,EXT.753. 1. Provide missing deed record information in the owners'dedication. 2. The Thoroughfare Plan conceptually shows an extension of Highland Avenue along the southern line of the property. * All taxes due must be paid prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Original signatures and seals will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. * Denotes Informational Comment enc. Exhibit'A' -Alternative alignments for the extension of Highland Street cc: F.L.Bailey Kathleen Sumner Ward Surveying Company w 3 ;:. t ! Q;cx «• °t - tY f 1 ��_ q ;! . IWI! i t4 es= s �'s- =3s:?_3 .?i i :i a� F ii ;; ss ; i+4 i ,ri « i -i= i .•s: = i Y to--«s yy 5°i�s Ur:: 3 - xsis4 c i !l: � t:difit; 3*�i� $ al= : :s = ias = : •: :s:. € s«: b;: = i:: .3ill- I.° °9: a '�i1 _# :irF; •ii - :r : i« ; ii ! t f_ s:�-i li�.i i =31 .. 13 si "�•� y ilu i =! •tt 11?_ s �i i ix n @ # WA i ggad its , i g.3 - i _ r- °!i !i°s : i �,?i lie # :! � s.- : 3 i !p ;�, ji• ; ii�1! �� :� =��1� :is :: :�. � t�]i3 � 3 i ;ll «iiiii« 311831,3,114 g R F �' ii n f ! 3li a 3s: c ? J Y J< a M f: t LI =it i: MY Mqf�.1�2f 6 ..t,.iwf -fli Est t = i «......tom o '#�# ��3i • i ��• " Q "Oa �' i i •r yet, ~ 1' , ♦ •' Y itY� NYeI•.� .x= ` 1.?x:fi�i�as•1• ' � ---sA _ x •i/�Y 9111/.� till WftMlNwtlf \ r M M•wr•w W�ntir I�I •u )tM it o Z E < z< x JX pX _® : Z �3{. UIW- NH o !� o W Z av �✓ t u Z_5 fF F U� Z> in J in &3-- (, I a City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 29, 1994 TO: Curtis E. Hawk,City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 94-78 Plat Revision/Monticello Phase III REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision of Lots 50R and 51R, Block 2, Monticello Phase III, being 14.712 acres situated in the William E. Crooks Survey, Abstract No. 295 and the M.M. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 533 LOCATION: South of W. Continental Blvd.,East of Continental Park Estates OWNER/APPLICANT Hills of Monticello,Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential/100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: None P&Z ACTION: July 21, 1994; Approved (5-0-1) subject to the first Plat Review Summary dated July 15, 1994. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plat Review Summary dated July 15, 1994 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached second Plat Review Summary dated July 29, 1994. KPG/bls N GAWPF\MEM0\CASES\94-78-PR.WPD �G- FROM :GR IT GULF GROUP DRLLRS TO - * 1994,07-26 04111PM #581 P.02/02 PARAMOUNT U J U L 71994 l LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. July 26, 1994 Greg Last Community Development Director City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76097• RE: Rovisod Preliminary Plat Monticello PH 4 / Timberlake Dear Mr. Lant: Please accept this letter as confirmation that Southlake Joint Venture is in agreement with eliminating the street crossing the creek between Timberlake And the proposed Monticello addition. It is our intention to submit a revised preliminary plat on the affected Timberlake property prior to submittal of a Final Plat on that phase of Timberlake. Sincerely, SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE Nicholas R. Di iuseppe cc: Paul Shakespeare David Howell Craig Curry Terry Wilkinson NNW LW Ing' INN rg IN A � W a AM v, cl TRACT MAP City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY 9 ' Case No: 9494-78 Review No: Two Date of Review: 07/29/94 Project Name: Plat Revision-Lots 50R&51R Block 2 Monticello Phase III OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGMER/SURVEYOR: Hills of Monticello Washington&Associates 601 Vicksburg Court 500 Grapevine Highway Southlake,Texas 76092 Suite 375 Hurst,Texas 76054 Phone: (817) 329-4599 Phone: (817)485-0707 Fax: Fax: (817)485-4106 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/27/94 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT TOM ELGIN AT(817)481-5581,EXT.753. 1. Provide missing deed record(s) in the preamble to the legal description and in the Peytonville R.O.W. abandonment note. * Original signatures and seals will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries(8.5" x 11" or 14" paper)with original signatures and seals on each. * Denotes Informational Comment CC' Hills of Monticello Washington& Associates ��'n .� �}'�',t �� �tccllul��i lj !1�• a � E _ • :�•. t. t! ilttt4ttl.[!t • ttt• ca + u+ i R� a Ij Jos ;::� Irii( ���[,�� r`n ��fe. - . .g• `�- . ( ,Z iT {.te) tt it�iT�• .�t,•,,u„t 11:i '- ill j > � 4 tb��� i3 w = ( ��( ,1 1'e'ntlua,lt) Rtthllltll!liitT t + i :'O a o 1 � 1 ��E�1 �' T�iii;i�'tT�ia'lilt(1,{jitQ01Tl1�11"l11l�IT (�5T• y � •�� 3 a�� tE tl 11,• ,l; i Itjll-llllillll-i[! ItTtT�ftttllk(t}l,Jtldttt dill -�{t�t� �'y�l;T}}�(((��j��ti]'tifi�Rt'•��1tSYEtt�i�F�6��i�(�s!��'�� 4' b Z S���'i �� '�-�, y����� .!'IRR911Tl01'�gll1111111�t i HIM r i i t 'jT ft t r t'lttt t �',tl lij flit, �� t• t :gill i .,, II/ .. 'f sG_ , '® ���� .+ e` -, R W, tsit I I 1 I Ob—n ;; Xlist, Nkllip 1 'I��lllitillullill Ar oil ,e•� � :� /;�'Y 1 p ' / : i `emsse ' �"--� <M I i��/�!����\\�/ ,�f`\ _ \ ' � ���` p 1` �`�ii= �}i' +till •' �+ lt ,l, ,l�ilt�lillt s �� I L-- , \ ,! / \ . . 1 ,!•,!! as e \ � 11 Ud Le 11 1' (�i , City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM I July 18, 1994 TO: Southlake Citizens, Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Report: 1994 City Council Retreat The attached report contains information submitted to the City Council during its annual retreat, which was held at the Solana Education Center on June 23 & 24, 1994. The purpose of the retreat was to discuss pressing issues which will impact the City during the coming budget year, long range planning issues, and to provide a forum in which Council members could discuss additional issues they have identified as important. This year's retreat was focused on public works issues. Given the growth of the City, infrastructure issues are of primary importance and council members spent much of their retreat time discussing water, sewer, roads, and drainage. Other issues will be important for the City during the coming fiscal year, and written summaries have been provided for those issues as well. It is important to note that while the Council provided feedback, asked questions, and discussed the issues, no formal action was taken on any of the agenda items. We anticipate that the items will resurface during the fiscal year, at which point the Council will be taking action. Each of the items has the name of a contact person included on the summary. I encourage you to communicate with that individual if you have any specific questions about an item. If you have general questions about the retreat, please call Shana Rice, Assistant City Manager, at 481- 5581 extension 705. We are looking forward to the coming year, the challenges we will be facing, and the opportunity to work with the City Council and Southlake citizens to meet those challenges. CEH I A I Tly.R su-*W. 4A.R- Y- City Council Retreat 1 JUNE 23-241 1994 SOLANA EDUCATION CENTER TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Septic System Analysis Pg. 3-10 II. Septic System Alternatives Pg. 11-12 in. Street Standards, Ordinance No. 217 Pg. 13-16 IV. Drainage Utility District Pg. 17 VI. Office of Economic Development Pg. 18 VII. 800 MHz Radios Pg. 19 VII. Public Safety Officer Program Pg. 20-21 IX. Southlake Program for the Pg. 22-25 Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN) X. Southlake 2010 -- Community Visioning Pg. 26-29 3 r CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue Septic System Analysis Background There has been a perception that the City is experiencing severe problems with septic systems on one acre lots. Discussion Subsurface Disposal Systems (SDS) operate on a simple process of settlement, biological activity, and filtration. There are three major components in an SDS: pipes to transport waste, septic tanks to settle solids and provide anaerobic digestion, and beds or trenches to provide for filtration and further biological activity. The problems that are appearing and which cause the greatest public reaction and concern occur in the third component. The basic design criteria for determining the size of the beds or trenches to be used is by analyzing soil types and percolation rates. Soil types range from sand (pervious) to clay (impervious). The location of a system is further determined by the presence of ground water, bedrock and the topography of the site. The way in which SDS beds or trenches operate is by conveying liquid from the septic tank to perforated pipes bedded in crushed stone. As the liquid flows through the pipe perforations in the pipe it is filtered through the crushed stone until it contacts the natural soil where it is then absorbed into the ground. At the plane where the crushed stone and the natural soil meet, a biological "mat" is formed. This mat will, over time, cover all of the surfaces of the crushed stone and will further promote the digestion of the sewage. The other function of the crushed stone is to provide for temporary storage of fluids until the natural soil can absorb the fluids. Several factors can cause a septic system to "fail" or appear to fail: 1) Presence of ground water 2) Saturation of soils under and around trenches and beds 3) Inadequate design relative to size 4) Usage in excess of the design flows 5) Natural failure of the system. 4 Presence of Ground Water - If ground water is too close to the bottom of the SDS trench, or bed, the amount of native soil that can absorb the waste liquid is reduced. Saturation of Soils - In the case of soils with a high clay content, moisture absorbed by the soil does not flow out of the soil. The result is like trying to pour water onto a sponge that is already saturated. The soil can not hold any more water and the hydrostatic pressures force the water along the path of least resistance -up or to the side. Yard irrigation can cause soil saturation. Inadequate Design - The standard absorption rates of the soils, based upon percolation rates, may not be adequate to provide for a large enough trench or bed system. Excess Usage - A system may have been designed for a certain flow. At a- later date extra bedrooms may have been added or extra waste flows may have been generated. Natural Failure - Septic systems are not forever. In highly porous soils and with regular maintenance of the septic tank (periodic pumping) a septic system might be expected to last 15 - 20 years. In areas where there is poor soil and if tank maintenance is not performed the effective life of a system could be less than 10 years. The City of Southlake currently uses the services of the Tarrant County Health Department in administering septic installations with in the City. Staff is proposing that these services be provided by City personnel. This position would be combined with the engineering position hired to handle drainage issues and would be located in the Engineering/Inspection Division of the Public Works Department. Several local studies have been done which have studied the issue of larger lots where septic systems are to be used for waste disposal. The City of Fort Worth has increased the size of lots with SDS to 3 acres. In discussions with Fort Worth city staff, it appears that there was not a lot of technical data to support this decision. The decision was made based on public testimony and appears to be a public policy decision. A study done for Westlake by Metroplex Engineering (Denton, TX) took a different tact. The State Sanitary Code allows for alternative disposal methods where perc rates are in excess of 60 minutes per inch or where there is a significant amount of clay in the native soils. Metroplex studied the method of land application of effluent in determining appropriate lot sizes. By analyzing and modifying set back requirements and making provisions for buildings, driveways, pools, etc, Metroplex was able to develop criteria for lots of 1 1/2 - 3 acres. This was for land application of the treated effluent. Several points must be made in any discussion of minimum lot sizes where septic systems are to be used. First, not all areas are affected. Lots and areas where there are sufficient large areas of sandy soils are excellent areas for septic systems. Second, an analysis of soil, water, slope, bedrock and percolation rates must be made BEFORE lots are platted or rezoned. The discussion of suitability of the soils is too late if platting has been done. Third, testing should be done at the appropriate times of year and in the presence of appropriate City staff. Ground water levels 5 vary greatly during the year. Proper determination of high ground water should be done in the spring when ground water is at its highest. Budget Impact If the City is to provide septic review and inspection services it is anticipated that these duties will be combined with the position being considered to provide drainage expertise. Revenues for this position will be generated through review and inspection fees. 6 SEPTIC SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES MOUND SYSTEM SURFACE IRRIGATION ` PRESSURE DOSING 7 . MOUND SYSTEM ' Used in areas of: • High Groundwater • Shallow Soil • Impermeable soils Description • Layers of sand and gravel above the native soil 8 SURFACE IRRIGATION Used in areas of: • Impermeable soils Description • Several tanks to promote settlement of solids \ • Pumps • Irrigation system • Sprinkler • Additional land to create setbacks 9 PRESSURE DOSING Used in areas of: • Elevation differential between tank and disposal area • High seasonal groundwater Description • Septic tank plus effluent storage tank \� • Pumps & alarm systems • Manifold to maintain constant pressure lu i w CONTROLS TO INSURE KETTi ER SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION Witness Testing Conduct Testing at Appropriate Times of Year Insure Testing Conforms to State Standards Increase Requirements for Flow Quantities Increase Soil Absorption Rates Require Detailed Soils Analysis Increase Offset Requirements for Side Slope Breakout Protection Inspection of Installation Require As-Built Drawings from Installer and/or Designer Require Septic Suitability Testing to be Done Prior to Platting Action 11 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue Lot Grading Review Procedure Background Problems have been arising in relation to grading of individual lots within additions. A large amount of staff time and effort is devoted to this issue. Discussion Upon the submittal of the construction plans for an addition, the developer and design engineer are required to submit an overall drainage and lot grading plan. During the review of these construction plans, the drainage plans are reviewed to insure that the drainage system for the entire addition is adequate to handle runoff. At this time the lot grading plans are reviewed to insure that lots do not adversely drain onto another lot. This is usually the last time that the engineering staff sees any drainage plans until there is a problem or conflict with lot drainage. The Building Inspection staff currently provides review and inspection services in conjunction with their normal services. Upon receipt of a building permit application, the Plans Examiner reviews the master grading plan to determine if there is any conflict. The Building Inspectors observe grading of the lots during construction; however, there is no formal signoff and confirmation that grades, slopes and elevations have been met. If there are problems in either the review or inspection, the Building Inspectors contact the City Engineer for advise or assistance in resolving the problems. Staff is proposing that a set of procedures similar to those being used in Colleyville (attached) be adopted for use in Southlake. These procedures include reviewing individual lot grading plans, insuring that individual plans conform to the master grading plan, inspection of grading prior to any concrete being placed, inspection of a lot prior to final acceptance (and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy) and resolution or mediation of disputes between homeowners, builders and developers. Budget Impact The impact of implementing these procedures will be the need to hire a drainage engineer. It is anticipated that this position will be combined with the position being considered to provide septic services. Revenues for this position will be generated through review and inspection fees. Colleyville currently charges $125 per lot for this service. (Additional duties which can be done 12 by this person will include assistance to the Street 8� Drainage Division in planning and i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e D r a i n a g e M a s t e r P l a n . ) lagrd 13 ., . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue Street Standards, Ordinance No. 217 Background Ordinance No. 217 was approved in December 1974, with modifications made in February 1978. Since that time standard practices have been unproved and situations have occurred which need to be addressed. Discussion Staff is proposing that Ordinance No. 217 be rewritten and considered. Some of the issues that will be addressed in the ordinance will be. pavement thickness, location of utilities, testing requirements, contractor responsibility and liability, reissuance of standard details. The basis for the ordinance will be the current ordinance. Budget Impacts Other than the cost of reproducing the ordinance and design standards there should be no impacts. streets 14 Street Standards ,; Ordinance No . 217 Table of Contents SECTION 1 PURPOSE AND INTENT SECTION 2 GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION 3 DEFINITIONS, STREET CLASSIFICATION FUNCTIONS SECTION 4 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS - PUBLIC STREETS SECTION 5 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS - PRIVATE, PA"Gr.ETC SECTION 6 STORM DRAIN DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION 7. STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 8 COST PARTICIPATION POLICIES SECTION 9 VARIANCES AND MODIFICATIONS SECTION 10 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 15 ALTERNATE PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTIONS (2150 vehicles per day) ALTERNATE 1 4" Hot Mix Asphalt 6" Crushed Stone 8" Select Fill ALTERNATE 2 4" Hot Mix Asphalt 8" Lime or Cement Stabilized Subgrade 8" Select Fill 16 ALTERNATE PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTIONS (3510 vehicles per day) ALTERNATE 1 5" Hot Mix Asphalt 6" Crushed Stone 8" Select Fill ALTERNATE 2 5" Hot Mix Asphalt 8" Lime or Cement Stabilized Subgrade 8" Select Fill ' r 17 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue Drainage Utility District \ Background The City currently has a large infrastructure or drainage facilities that need to be inventoried, inspected and maintained. In order to do this a funding mechanism needs to be established to provide sufficient funds for this effort. Discussion Since drainage affects all the citizens of the City an equitable means of funding drainage studies and projects needs to be implemented. Several communities fund this type of district by adding a fee to monthly water bills. The funds generated by a Drainage Utility District would be used for several purposes. 1) Initial Inventory of drainage system 2) Development of computerized data base and maps 3) Critical drainage structure study 4) Engineering services (internal and external) for drainage projects 5) Drainage projects of a minor or recurring nature 6) Creation of a capital projects account to help fund major projects Budget Impact The major impact in the creation of a Drainage Utility District would be in the fees to be charged to the citizens. Funds generated by this fee would be used to fund existing and could, in effect, free up general revenues for other purposes. 18 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue Office of Economic Development Background The Office of Economic Development was launched in February 1994. Major ,projects completed or in process include 1) property profile of Agricultural tracts 30 acres and larger, 2) profile of commercial or potential commercial properties advertised for sale, 3) database of Southlake businesses, 4) Community Profile and Southlake Fast Facts updates with revised version expected to be published by mid-August, 5) Southlake retail centers and development information circulars, 6) F.M. 1709 ribbon cutting, and 7) participation in April Metroport Showcase. Discussion The Economic Development Advisory Committee, appointed by City Council, currently meets quarterly with the Economic Development Coordinator. The Advisory Committee provides guidance on future projects. To date, the Committee and the Coordinator have discussed the following: 1) long-term Economic Development Strategic Plan involving significant community participation and input from S.H. 114/F.M. 1709/F.M. 1938 Corridor Study, 2) Southlake business questionnaire, 3) participation in City survey addressing residents' economic development needs and concerns, 4) Southlake video, 5) complete re-write of Community Profile, and 6) color brochures. The Economic Development Coordinator will continue to participate in the Greater Dallas Chamber Economic Development Allies program. Members of this program plan various national marketing trips throughout the year and meet regularly to discuss regional topics of interest. Also, the Coordinator is proposing attendance at one major economic development training seminar, formation of the Economic.Development library, and memberships in major economic development organizations. Budget Impact Many of these baseline development projects will require the services of professionals outside the City of Southlake organization, such as research consultants, facilitators, video specialists, and writers. Upon completion of these projects, the City of Southlake will have both long and short term goals and marketing materials to guide our economic future. Additionally, the Office anticipates answering an increasing number of requests for information as major projects, such as the Southlake Marketplace, are completed. 19 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue 800 MHz Radios Background The 800 MHz transition was made while exploring alternative radio frequencies to'replace the low ban system that was being used by the Fire Service. There was extensive research into those alternatives because the low ban system had become unserviceable from both a fiscal and practical application. We worked with Motorola, among others, for several months evaluating the alternatives. The 800 MHz system rapidly became the best option. Discussion We have provided a summary of the activity the Department engaged in to realize our current position. During this transition we consistently utilized our resources available to provide a system of checks and balances to ensure that we were on the right track; i.e., John Francis of Motorola and a citizen of Southlake with extensive knowledge of the history of City of Southlake Communications, Houston Galvaston Area Council of Governments (HGAC) for expertise and bid prices, and the City of Houston which is the largest 800 system in Texas, to name a few. SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES January, 1990 - August, 1990 Existing fire service radio system on low band. Talk-in severely limited. Units can talk to each other in the field if in close proximity, traffic to base limited by power of portables and channel skip. Study performed to check on possible upgrades or improvement due to life safety issues. No additional channels are available in other bands because metroplex suffers from frequency congestion. Power increase on base station will not help talk-in problem. Ft. Worth circulates letter surveying multi-agency interest in trunked 800 MHz radio system for multi jurisdictions. August, 1990 - March, 1991 Realizing that only a few 800 MHz radio channels were left in the metroplex, Southlake meets with North Richland Hills and other cities to check possibility of construction of multi-agency trunked radio system. Eleven cities agree in principal in an attempt to gather the last remaining 5-8 channels. Southlake equipment share of the system estimated at $81,000. 20 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY a 4' Issue Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN) Background Last November, Council approved the ordinance creating the Southlake Program for the ' Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN). Since that time staff has been working closely with interested citizens to develop an operational framework for the program. t A Town Hall Meeting held in March drew well over 100 participants. During that meeting the Council and staff received feedback from citizens about the structure of the program. It was determined that each neighborhood should have the opportunity to recommend a potential chair to the City Council for appointment. Neighborhood Chair appointments were made by City Council on May 17, 1994 and staff immediately began working with the appointees to organize their neighborhoods. On June 15 &20 the staff and Neighborhood Chairs came together for an organizational meeting and officially kicked off the implementation of the program. Discussion s, The primary purpose for SPIN, as delineated by Council, is to advise the City Council and its staff on the needs and opinions of Southlake citizens and to provide residents with information on City policies and programs. During the organizational meeting, representatives expressed their expectations of the program, as follows: -Council should be open to the input provided by SPIN, -There should be an effort made to open lines of communication, develop trust, -Council/staff should be responsive to neighborhood issues, -Council/staff should explain reasons behind the decision(s) made, -Staff should contact SPIN Neighborhood Chairs when problems arise (i.e., water) -SPIN Neighborhood Chairs should promote understanding of other neighborhoods, -SPIN wants to receive information on activities in other neighborhoods -SPIN Neighborhood Chairs should serve as resources for each other, -Council/staff should be open to new ideas, + -Council/staff should have a real committment to the program, -SPIN should meet often with each other/Council, -Everyone should maintain a broad perspective Staff has offered substantial support to the Neighborhood Chairs to assist them in having successful programs. For example, the City will offer a leadership training workshop to help the chairs with meeting facilitation and leadership issues. Additionally, the City Manager's 21 Office has agreed to process requests for information from the Neighborhood Chairs, assist with } recruitment and retention of Neighborhood Council members, publish information in the City newsletter. Recognizing that the program is in its fledgling stage, the staff in the City Manager's office has agreed to help in any way possible. Since the organizational meetings are now complete, SPIN Neighborhood Chairs will begin work with their Neighborhood Councils in earnest, and will begin working with staff on a strategic plan for the community. The following'describes their activities for the next few months. July 1994 Participate in TEAM Focus Exerci�� August 1994 Work w/Staff on Designing a Citizen Survey Attend Leadership Training ��. Oct. 1994 - February 1995 Work w/Staff on Developing a Strategic Plan February 1995 Present Strategic Plan at Annual SPIN Meeting April 1995 Present Strategic Plan to Council Additionally, the SPIN Neighborhood Chairs have expressed an interest in having an opportunity to have become educated about the City's operations. As such, we will be working closely with them on "mini-workshops" to provide information on all facets of City systems. One of the SPIN representatives has described the group as being "hungry" for information and opportunities to be involved. Already, 16 requests for information have been received from SPIN, and the program is not yet implemented! Budget Impact The biggest impact to the budget will be the staff time required to respond to requests for information, and requests for speakers at Neighborhood Council meetings. Initially, there may be some expenses involved with helping the Neighborhood Chairs recruit their Councils. The cost of the monthly newsletter will probably increase with the addition of a regular "SPIN Page" containing news from Neighborhood Chairs to neighborhoods. 22 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue Public Safety Officer Program \ Background In October 1990, the City Manager, Mayor and Council, looking for ways to be..fiscally responsible with the taxpayer's money initiated the Department of Public Safety. Discussion Our concept provides for a minimum number of fire and police officers, supplemented by the Public Safety or cross-trained officer. This is a simplified way of describing the Southlake Department of Public Safety's system, but in actuality the program is a multi-faceted operation conceived to obtain the maximum impact of each public safety tax dollar expended. 4 A few examples of this opportunity are the departmental training officer overseeing all police, fire and communications training needs; coordinated purchasing for all of Public Safety; cooperative long-range planning in Public Safety that will eliminate problems that surrounding cities are experiencing; utilizes communicators in non-traditional roles for police and fire service, thus reducing the need of additional clerical staffing through the divisions; and perhaps the greatest benefit is the acquisition and retention of qualified and dedicated employees through increased training and curtailing the hiring of traditional, additional employees by providing a quality benefit package. The City by not hiring traditionally has been able to provide a competitive salary structure that can be continually upgraded. The key to the aforementioned opportunities lay primarily with the Public Safety Officer. The Department currently has one Public Safety Officer, with a request for two additional PSO's in this year's budget. As any community grows and matures the calls for police service will increase, not necessarily in severity but if for no other reason, but to correspond with the population increase. In fire service, because our community is relatively new, our building and fire codes are diligently enforced and with fire services continually upgrading those codes, pure fire calls will not usually increase relative to increased population. This, however, does not minimize the urgency and danger of a pure fire call. Staffing on scene at those types of calls are extremely critical for operational success and firefighter safety. Emergency Medical Service and rescue which is provided by the Fire Service Division, however, will increase proportionally as the population increases causing the issue of staffing to again be addressed. Enter the Public Safety Officer. A fully trained, certified and licensed police officer/firefighter capable of interacting in both divisions at the highest expectations. 23 .y The City Manager and Council have worked diligently over the last few years to bring in-house Fire Service staffing levels to four officers per shift, excluding the Fire Marshal or volunteers. Police Services is currently staffed at three officers per shift, excluding the Public Safety Officer or the three traffic officers. With the exception of specific job descriptions (detectives, fire captain, fire prevention officer, additional fire/police lieutenant and sergeants), the Department of Public Safety will concentrate primarily on the acquisition of Public Safety Officers. These officers are a mobile force that individually or collectively may be assigned to the Police or Fire `Divisions depending on divisional staffing needs. The advantages of the-PSO are numerous to mcRide the ability to staff for a confabulation of any nature calls for service, extended training, sick leave, vacation, reduction of overtime and the reduction of overall department personnel budget. We require the Public Safety Officer to work and train at least one day of his shift week in the fire station; but he has been assigned more shifts on numerous occasions due to various reasons. Public Safety Officer David Law (a PSO for about 18 months) working from October 1, 1993 to June 1, 1994 has logged the following work record per division. Fire Service Division Worked 41 - 12-hour days Worked 576 fire service related hours Worked 85 fire calls Police Service Division Worked 74 - 12-hour days Worked 456 police calls There are more police calls than fire calls and Officer Law's shifting pattern is usually one or two fire days to two or three police days. Our PSO concept has received numerous inquiries from other cities and has been a success to date and will be exemplary in the future. Budget Impact There is a cost to the PSO, both in training and incentives, but they are nominal compared to the addition of a traditional firefighter or police officer that would cost the taxpayer a minimum of$35,000 in salary and benefits for each traditional officer hired prior to probation, uniforms, training and equipment. 24 August, 1992 , Equipment requests are revised, updated and lowered to $57,385. The City agrees to wait until last 4th quarter of 1992 in order to receive the most updated radio, just being released for same as previously quoted price. February, 1991 - April, 1993 New portables shipped and installation is completed by April. The 800 MHz system, like any radio system, is not devoid of all problems but it does more than adequately serve the Southlake Department of Public Safety and its citizens. It is consistently being upgraded by the City of Ft. Worth to better serve its customers. There are several 800 systems being proposed or in service in the metroplex area and we constantly monitor those activities for opportunities to better serve the taxpayers. Attached is a memorandum requesting that no other antenna additions be considered at the North White Chapel water tower site because there are possibilities of existing 800 coverage from other cities that we may want to explore that would offer a monetary benefit to us. Also attached is a memorandum from Director Williams on his experience with the 800 system. Budget Impact The Ft. Worth trunked radio system actually consists of two separate systems. System 1 consists of a multi-site system with towers located at Euless, NCNB Bank downtown Ft. Worth and at the Rolling Hills water tower located on S. Loop 820. System 2 is a single site system located on the NCNB bank building. Should either system fail, even based on the redundancy, we could instantly switch to the alternate system. Upon entering the contract with Ft. Worth we reserved 60 slots with the ability to expand that number by 87% at any time in the future. For those 60 slots we agreed to pay Ft. Worth $62,940. This is payable over a 10 year period. The payment each year also includes infrastructure maintenance. This fee is only charged per active radio. It covers the costs involved in maintaining the system, electric bill, etc. The fee varies slightly year-to-year but is expected to be $135 per radio for the next several years. Maintenance on the radios is $84 per year. Thus, our costs to be on the 800 radio system this year are as follows: Annual payment on 60 slots $ 8,340 Infrastructure maintenance on 24 active radios $ 3,240 Annual radio maintenance on 24 active radios $ 2,016 TOTAL $13,596 25 April, 1991 Budget preparation begun with favorable outlook for 11 city system. DFW airport expected to install Motorola system also, which will enhance coverage. Formal packet sent to Region 40 (area licensing authority) requesting approval. June, 1991 - July, 1991 HGAC bid for equipment received at estimate of $78,000. Denton County provided confirmation of authorization to use the Denton tower and associated t"ed system. Usage of Denton system based on 24 radios was $2,200 initially and $700 per year for maintenance costs. August, 1991 Budget authorized $78,000 for radio system. September, 1991 - November, 1991 Both the Denton and Ft. Worth systems were field tested using mobile and portable radios. Denton system failed to provide total coverage; there were many low spots where there was no coverage. The Ft. Worth system provided coverage in over 90% of the area, although some difficulty was noted in ability to transmit from inside buildings or below grade level. October, 1991 Ft. Worth granted authorization for all remaining channels on 800 MHz. This effectively ends the 11 city N.E. Tarrant County plan. January, 1992 Ft. Worth City Council authorized Intra-agency Communication System allowing Ft. Worth to begin accepting customers on the system. Costs set at $1,300 per slot (radio) plus annual maintenance of about $6,000 based on the number of participants in the system. April, 1992 Southlake meets with Jay Marshall, Director of Information Resources to discuss costs and transfer of 450 MHz frequency that Ft. Worth will discontinue using. June, 1992 Southlake City Council adopts Resolution 92-26 authorizing City to enter into contract with Ft. Worth. No other frequencies are available at the time for fire use. Current equipment is at least 10 years old and the model of portable radio the Fire Service carries has been discontinued. • 26 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Council Retreat June 23 & 24, 1994 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issue Southlake 2010 -- Community Visioning Background The organization of SPIN and staff development activities, i.e., the Director's Retreat resulted in much discussion about planning for the future of Southlake. Staff is concerned about the internal organization and efforts are being made to meet the objectives of our Mission Statement. In addition to setting organizational goals, the rapid growth of the community mandates that a strategic plan be put into place to address the issues and concerns of citizens. This issue was discussed by the Council during the City Manager's annual performance review. Discussion Staff has proposed a comprehensive approach to developing a strategic plan. This approach will involve the City Council, all boards and commissions, Neighborhood Councils, and staff, with much of the work will be accomplished through the SPIN structure. It is hoped that the process can begin immediately with a TEAM FOCUS (electronic brainstorming) exercise for the SPIN Standing Committee. Development of a quality of life survey will be the next step in the process. It is hoped that the survey can be conducted during September of this year. Once the results of the survey are compiled, the process of developing the strategic plan will begin. This will be a somewhat cumbersome undertaking, and will require several months to complete. Once the document is finalized, the results will be used to develop next year's budget. To ensure that the survey and resulting plan are "unbiased", staff proposes the use of the University of North Texas as a consultant on the survey project. UNT offers this service through the International City/County Management Association. It would also be appropriate to secure technical assistance with the planning portion of the project, given the data which will be accumulated during the process. See the attachment for a schedule of project activities. Budget Impact The budgetary impact of this project will be the costs of procuring the services of the consultants, the cost of conducting TEAM FOCUS, and the costs of postage, printing and staff time to coordinate the process. 27 r PLANNING FOR SOUTHLAKE'S FUTURE BEGINS Mission Statement/Citizen Satisfaction Survey to Guide Process A rapidly growing and dynamic city requires constant updates to the planning process to ensure , that tomorrow's challenges are anticipated and addressed as they are presented. Recognizing that Southlake is changing significantly, the City Council has encouraged staff to intensify its organizational and strategic planning efforts. Two Tier Approach - The Council has expressed interest in looking at two interrelated, yet separate areas of planning: maximizing the effectiveness of the internal organization, and creating a mechanism for "community visioning." The fast will include an evaluation of internal processes as they relate to achieving the objectives articulated in Southlake City employee's Mission Statement. The second will involve developing a quality of life vision for Southlake in the Year 2010. �. Internal Challenges - The City's top managers participated in a one and one-half day work session on March 25 &26 to tackle issues facing the organization. Using the Mission Statement as a basis for developing specific, measurable objectives, they prioritized activities designed to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of City staff. The importance of the March session is than it marked the beginning of the comprehensive planning process for the municipal organization. Community Vision - In addition to setting organizational goals, the Council has expressed an interest in implementing a strategic planning process for the community, working primarily through SPIN. The Council has conceptually approved an approach which will take approximately one year to complete. It is hoped the results of the planning effort will be presented at the 1995 mid year review. The proposed timetable includes: 5/17/94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Council Appoints SPIN Standing Committee 7/94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TEAM Focus (Electronic Brainstorming) w/SPIN 8/94 . . . . . . . . . . Design Citizen Quality of Life Survey 9tgffi1SPIN/Appointed Boards& Commissions/Cowan) 9/94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Conduct Survey 10/94-2/95 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Develop Strategic Plan (StaffISPIN/Appointed Boards & Commissions/CowwU) 2/95 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Present Southlake 2010 to Neighborhoods 1995 Annual SPIN Meeting 4/95 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . Present Southlake 2010 to City Council Budget Process Begins More information about the planning process will be forthcoming as the process evolves. In the meantime, questions should be directed to Shana Rice at 481-5581 ext. 705. 2s cn— —z m \�� 00 q~ r H BeltGne N. O . Mes uite Bend Bent c 8� n Cp e,C Rty rnrg�ooa � ►-� n }� O y000 a O � Woe ta � w aQ o• ^ oc tz tz .r bdEs�'• m 0 v Q A tz tz to C A i O O O A 29 SPIN W TEAAf FOCUS EXERCISE � The City Council and staff are excited about working with the SPIN STANDING COMMITTEE members as they represent the Neighborhood Councils and bring forth issues and concerns of their group. The City has arranged for the Standing Committee to participate in a TEAM FOCUS exercise at the IBM Royal Tech Center in Irving (see map). This is an intense half4ay program which will serve as the beginning of the City's strategic planning process. Please address the followingquestions dur \ q ing your next Neighborhood Council meeting and bring your answers with you to the TEAM FOCUS exercise. 1. What do you like about Southlake? 2. What would you like to change about Southlake? 3. What do you not want to change about Southlake? Please indicate which days you could attend the TEAM FOCUS exercise and return the bottom portion to the City Manager's Office, SPIN, 667 North Carroll.Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092 or call (817) 481-5581, extension 703. Please respond by July 1. You will be notified of the exact day and time of the meeting as soon as it is arranged. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .-r:::::.:.:.•.. ..: -:..,......f;..:{:;}};it..::•}:::.;�.r, i� r: `•:?t•:::..t•}c<}ir••::-i::-}:;}Y..n ...,...,�, ••:;;<•�:�:::i:G•:;:ii:•}:?•:•+'.. x {.•?v:::::{�{'•.•?:, +y-::}.:,r.}ii r.:{,'vr'ny/ q•v - •}:>L: �' ♦♦�� j•Y{... ..::. :4:•Y�i:�ii:ti4i '•�'•'-`�'''• 'v{>}}}}}ii}i'r'�itr'::.-Y.•r:?�'-••i:+tt• :-:fv}. y� 'S}vi:F v� {•.}:ti::.:v x� ..s} �)r�. :f:y,:.v:•'J y: ..+'.rff .{{�. �.;i:•,},'{:;y+{;}y.vi!;:}:jt4: ::}!r' _ l l•:;�x+,::j:¢'-'tf.-;{v{>j: +`+l^r' v:*.. :•;;;-.;r. .}y2+'/ ` x- ,ss`3�`":=': ++':{ r. :.f.':•. j?•:': .:}'•}:?}.>%�s�{?...+..i pt}v.i;`'-":tv.•.•:+VM:..•}:•i:::::.i'-+'n' •\ f- y►�•�.n"'•.+.�.••.•::•...... r ..:::..... ..r...va.rt.:r-:::.. .::::::::::.:}ii:.....:::::::::.v:.v .n. .ri},x•. xt!:{::.::: ::::.�::::::::::::.v::::.v:::.... -}.Gi>}:-::ii:vi:•:::w:::::::::::•::::-....!::ii::i-.:::::i:J:ii'-:iii}ii:':�i:�ii�i:::::v::.:::::. v.. +i............. ..... .......:::::>ivn.....:::vv::::r/.:4....v:::::::::::s.}Y4}:-:::::::.:::::.::::::::::�:::::::::::.:::.v:±::::::?:.:.vv:f•::. v.: + :iiY�••, ..f. �ii r+}:•: .hi10 ON y{. •+,•.:•,•�,.,',.,fv:it`-:;:%:?t!1. r,� 7 l !-•i'{n; x.{v. {'':......... .... ... Y:iii::ii::is?4:ii:M1::::.:::......... - r:•: ::is .. i. .,:....:a•:.:.:....::.... .:::...:::.:::.....:. :i:::::::=i;fii:'iii::is::ii::>:.::..c:>:it�:}$:'+.•`:: :;:>:...:.........................:.... ........W�t ; :::. . ::. ,{},....:}}:•i. ::::::;:: iiiii}i>i;:;.iii>'.;:;:iii.}ia .......:..... ........Y� 3' :............ ...r. K .. •.. ...v... ':::::.'.':?:??::'r::::::?::?iyiiii??:?i:>i•.:sf$Y}f:iiF:'4:i'r . ........... ............. •r.4•: ........ •:x:; ::::f:.}t:? �+:.n -::::::::::::::::::.v::iiii}}i}•::.v:.:.....:..:::::yyw::::::•:.v,::::::::::::::::.:....... :.:..,.... .... ..................::::::f.;:.r.:i}:oi:•i:}}}:;.;:a:-:cii3;i?;-:. ....-r:•::w...:..:... ........v}+s-.:........................... ........ ....................:.:..n..:J.+.f.:fC:::.;:i:?.;:.}:.}}•,:.}.:,i.;;v:.rii}:�"i'i:�i'r:�i?.� :.r .. :.rv.. v.r:.v:. ..;,.........................::::-::.v::::.:::.:v.rr::ff•e::.:i�...:::.-:�.:::..:......::n :::}i:}}i:{4Y•}}:•}ii}:?:^::.}}:•:4%i:'fv:rr fir^}::�/.•:.ffit�:�++. f .,...r.r...r..::: ...-.....r...... }4.. ^••••. .+hHlS+ \itiivOit•}lr}:rf�?iC::J?:•::im'}f t:?}:''A'?fFit+�J•"' Name 1 c:I pfilerlrplalteam.f« ♦ . I , , . . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE E — T Parks & Recreation Division `ow So uthta Donation Form I Proposed Donation: Donor: Activity Sign Southlake Women's Club, Inc. Proposed Donation Description C (Please include a complete description of the proposed donation and, to the extent applicable, pictures and/or detailed drawings. Attach additional pages as necessary.) C The Women's Club voted to earmark $3,050 from proceeds from the annual Spaghetti Dinner fund raiser held on February 25, 1994 for a sign to be installed at the park entrance -- either old or new. The want the City to purchase a 2-sided sign with interchangeable letters, lighted for visibility at night. The sign would be used to advertise upcoming park programs, or provide other information about park activities to those citizens passing by the park. C C L la" C Estimated Value: Preferred Stipulations: Location: $ 3,050.00 At either entrance "Donated by Southlak.e Women's Club" of Bicentennial permanently affixed in print similar to Park heading, but much smaller, Installation within one year IE x} '.?}•:i:•is:•::::•:•:iiii\�ii$iiYr'r'rii'rii'riiiii'riiii:'LCC:iii:?::2>+::ii::::?ii:t:`:::S:`}iiii}iiii:^ii'iSii:Y^iiii'iiii:�iiiiii:::i?ii �iii�'T '�]{� �`_!�::J• ::}i;}}:IX••}%•:isti•}:G:v}:?ry:0'•}}i}:•}:?4}:4}:L:•}}:4y}}}:4}}}}:i.}}}}}}}}:;-}}}}Xi4:S?4i}i}:•}:J:i?^}:9:•}:O}ii:�}}:•}}:•.}}}}}}:v:•}}}:4i}:i.}:ii.}:i{.}:?•}':j�:;'r-:}�:;:;:yj�i:;i:�(:;�:�<j;:;: '::}1'4f i�1�i:�if •'• i:•ii:•::�::•is�:9.•:x:S::i?}}:}-viittiii::;;::}iii>iiii>iriiii x{p' yf{ti _L •:`•� :}}?.+{f'•:•.?;:}}{y::':M1::::}::�?:::{5��:�i::i:}i?ti:4::?i:is:::i:�iii:i: ii?$i::iiiiiiiiii::iiiii:�:iiiji:i:�:�:rii�iSi �:�::::::�:y�:;iss�i:sir:�:�:�:�ii:�:ti>':�.............. •}}::+r}r:.:•: •:•ti•::i?:�::::S:::ti�:�::::ri:::::iyYjji::::i<:�: ::}:f' •i:::.:::.::ii::iii:iiii :rii'riiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i:i:?::s::F:..::::isii:L:iiii'r%.iiiii'r'%:iiiiii'r:ti•:::::•}:}:::::nv:+:+:::::::::}:::::::::::n::::?J.r•}}}'•,:;w?�i::•,,:C?i .{i iiiiiii+�}}::iiii.:. ........................... i•.i....::.:.}.p:w rG:ti ^.^.:4:^.:•}}}.•}}}?•}:i4:4: •}:^.:•}:4:•}:•iiii:.:•}:3}}}:•}}}}}}}}}:}}:i.}:•}:•}:•}}:•}: •}:•}i:•}::^}:4:•}:•:}}:• .................. ........ ::::v}:w::::::: :::::v:::••r•:•.•..•...:...:..?.r.x..n.::+rii.v:::::::;}n.n..::..................... ...................................... t IL _ ... ..r. ......... ?{.::.•.......:........ .... ........ ..........................w: :::: ::.v::::.-::. .. :::•w:• :::::.+.v: ::A:::?>.•}::•}:• •}•}:•}:^:}:•}:6:4:G:^:•}:^:??^•} ���:`•�:��#!' .. r.•i»'•Ki;:;i::r..,,,,,,,,,..M1.:.....� .'. �i.....r.......:......i:...................#��2:•'•:? �5 ::.:i:.:::..... ....... ..... ......... {��r.....: .......r..r .. ;t..;..:.i.•:.•.• ::: ::n:vxh:•}:•}:•}:^:•}:4:4:4:^:•i:^:•:•:.........................:..........v:...............��w:::....-....: ::::::: :.i•}:•}hi:L:•khY.�:•}:•:::. :::::::::::: ::::: .�,';'{ A}y :::::::::T.+•.::::::::::::::::::::::::: .j}Fi1::::i::::i:'i::i::i::;��:��}::}::::::i::::i::::iiii::�i:::�:}p�}�;p�'iiii:::::::::tiiiii'•i'::i:::::�::::i::i::i::::i::::i::::i::::i::::ii::i::i::::i:::iiii:}:i:j;`!4'!!.y�yyi::}�,.,.,.�,.,,,::.�.,:,-,.,.,,,W?FF4;;:i:::i::::::'•::::i:::::::::::}.::::.v:rrr•::::::::::�:.:.:�•::::::::::::.v:::: rrr .��".'�.T'��.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. •:':4--•M1••-•riS•:••••••:;:••••.i::.........?i:�•:.....i.:ii..i:.:..:.ii::•iiii:::iiii::;iiii}ry;:yi:;:iiii:::+.:i:........:.::.:<::...:::.. .. ...:•:}::..:ri::..?'i:i:::}'rii:. i:i�Y::::i:::}vf<�:�i:i:ii:j�:; •v:::.4::....• }:::.v::...::::::::nv::w::::::::::::::::::::.v:.:::::::::::: :::.:v::: :::::.v::: : ..... ... : :: :..,.v:: �5. '---isi::ti: .::•:-:.isG :4::::•}:•}:??}::......:4:•}:•i}:t•}:4%:•}:n:•}:••:?y}}}:•i:Li.....}:---- .}}}i}}}}}}}}}?}}}}--...:}i}}:^......:?v:•}:^:•}:•••:G:4}4:}....:v:^:•}..... . ::::!ii s/.:::::-.::::•:::::i::::::'::•::•••:••:•:::::::::: •:::':'.:•..isi::::::::::.:'.:}:;;; ..:...: >:,:.:.::.::.::.::.::::'::.::.::.::::::;::::�isiiiiiiiii::•:R•:•:?•:iiii.'?•iiiiiii:::i}:•.'•:.+•:i::isi::•}:•i....:.::•::::} :..:ci:::::::...:Y...:: C -E E. Cityof Southlake i DuthFak' August 2, 1994 I Mayor. Gary Fickes yor Pro Tem: erry Farrier Honorable Mayor Fickes and ncilmembers: Members of City Council el Richarme City of Southlake Stephen W.Apple Sr.s Ralph Eva 667 N. Carroll Avenue p Michael Franks Southlake, Texas 76092 drew L.Wambsganss City Manager: _ rtis E.Hawk Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: sistant City Manager: Shana K.Rice 1ndraLLeGrand The ro osed FY94-95 Annual Bud et in financial terms the lan for proposed g presentsP accomplishment of municipal objectives during the forthcoming fiscal year. L isr In accordance with the Texas Local Government Code and the Charter of the City Cof Southlake, the proposed Annual Budget for fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994 and ending September 30, 1995 is submitted for your consideration. The budget proposes a tax rate of$.4500 per $100.00 property valuation, a half scent (.005) decrease from the current rate of $.4550. This will mark the fourth consecutive year with no tax increase. The calculated Effective Tax Rate for the FY94-95 budget year is $.43912. The Effective Tax Rate is the rate that will generate the same amount of property tax dollars as the previous year, excluding new construction, when the two years are compared. The budget preparation it requires a comparison of the anticipated revenues with proposed programs, and priorities are established based on service demands or prior commitments to E projects. kir 667 North Carroll Avenue •Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-6796 or Metro (817) 481-0036 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 2, 1994 Page 2 FUND SUMMARIES In all operating funds, the proposed FY94-95 Annual Budget of the municipal corporation presented for your consideration projects expenditures of i $13,943,610. These expenditures are accounted for in six (6) separate funds: General Fund; General Obligation Debt Service Fund; Utility Fund; Special Revenue-Parks/Recreation Fund; Southlake Parks Development Corporation (SPDC Operations Fund, and SPDC Debt Service Fund. The General Fund and the G.O. Debt Service Fund together account for the distribution of the expenditures of the revenue generated by the proposed $.4500 tax rate. In addition, this budget proposes to establish a Capital Projects Fund, separate from the operating budget, which will provide funding for the City's major public f works infrastructure improvements. In this fund, $654,326 will come from General Fund transfers. General Fund Summar y The General Fund supports all municipal operations with the exception of the water and wastewater utility operations and the operations of the SPDC. Revenues The proposed FY94-95 Annual Budget projects $6,700,490 in General Fund revenues, which is an increase of $1,854,316 or 38.3% from the FY93-94 Adopted Budget. EL The largest single revenue source in the proposed budget is the ad valorem (property) tax. The budget as proposed will provide $2,325,950 in revenue for C C Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 2, 1994 Page 3 lbw the General Fund maintenance and operations budget, an estimated increase of $121,752 or 5.5% from the FY93-94 Adopted Budget. The second largest General Fund revenue source in the proposed budget is derived from the municipal permits and fees charged for various development activities, such as fees for zoning, platting and building permits. The proposed budget of$1,941,350 projects an increase of$853,350 or 78.4% over the current year. For FY94-95, the City is projecting 650 permits to be issued. The City estimates 610 permits for the current year, ending September 30, 1994. The third largest General Fund revenue source is the municipal sales tax. Sales tax revenues are projected at $1,233,000 in the proposed budget, an increase of $531,500 or 75.8% over the FY93-94 Adopted Budget. Consistently over the L ,,r,, past several years, the City has experienced double digit growth in sales tax receipts. During FY92-93, the City's first major retail center, Crossroads Square, opened. Two other major retail centers are scheduled to open in the latter part of FY93-94 or early FY94-95. Based upon current collections, the sales tax revenue for the 1993-94 fiscal year is estimated to be $865,000, an increase of$163,500 or 23.3% over the amount projected for the current year. C The other major revenue sources for the General Fund are franchise fees ($418,040) from the private utility companies operating in the City, municipal fines ($242,400), and transfers ($328,000) into the General Fund from the Utility Fund. Franchise fees are projected to increase by $81,640 or 24.3%, while revenues from fmes are expected to increase $10,960 or 4.7% from the amount kiw budgeted in'FY93-94. C C Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 2, 1994 Page 4 \.► Charges for services are estimated at $80,000, which includes $49,000 for the Special Services Program. This is the interlocal contribution from the Grapevine/Colleyville and Carroll Independent School Districts to the City's D.A.R.E. program, as well as the Special Resource Officer in the C.I.S.D. Other charges for service are for recreation class fees and Fire Division related income. Miscellaneous income is projected at $41,750, an increase of $23,810 over the prior year. The proposed budget reflects $90,000 in interest earnings, the an increase of $40,000 from the amount estimated for the current year when the budget was proposed. -41111/ Expenditures The proposed General Fund budget proposes $6,485,565 in expenditures to accomplish municipal objectives. The proposed expenditures represenx an increase of $622,798 or 10.6% over the current year. The budget also includes $654,326 in major capital improvement expenditures, that will be accounted for in a capital projects fund. The bulk of the total increase for FY94-95 is in Public Safety, $539,470 (24.7%). The largest increase for new programs within the Public Safety Department is in it the Police Services Division, increasing approximately $224,281 (21.9%). This increase reflects the commitment made by the City to implement the consolidated Public Safety operation by adding four (4) new Public Safety Officers (required to be certified and operate as both fire and police). A new detective position is also proposed in order to meet the work demands. C C .E Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 2, 1994 Page 5 - The proposed budget reflects a decrease of$759,380 within the Streets/Drainage Division. The FY93-94 budget included $431,000 in new equipment and vehicles. This proposal includes $119,500 in new equipment and vehicles. In FY93-94 the budget provided $253,045 in Public Works capital projects. For FY94-95, the $654,326 in capital projects within this division are funded through a transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund. One new Drainage Maintenance Worker is scheduled for an October 1 hire date, an estimated $22,675. Personnel Highlights The proposed budget reflects the pay and classification plan, implemented in January 1994, for a full twelve months. The General Fund will support a total of 115.5 positions in FY94-95. The proposed budget projects an increase of twelve (12) full time and two (2)part P P g time positions in the General Fund. These positions are needed to enable the,City to maintain effective management of service demands. The positions are: g one (1) Full time Assistant to the City Manager one (1) Full time Police Detective one (1) Full time Special Resource Officer four (4) Full time Public Safety Officers one (1) Full time Project Engineer one (1) Full time Street/Drainage Maintenance Worker two (2) Full time Park Maintenance Workers one (1) Full time Planning Technician one (1) Part time Recreation Clerk Now one (1) Part time Court Clerk C C • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 2, 1994 Page 6 Other Expenditure Highlights • City Secretary/Mayor/City Council - $17,000 SPIN program; $20,000 Codification of Ordinances • Economic Development - $30,000 Marketing plan • Support Services - $44,000 Consulting fees ($24,000 computer; $20,000 other); $31,275 upgrade and expand telephone system. • Fire Services - $51,000 Signal changers; $35,500 brush truck chassis; $10,000 water rescue craft. • Police Services - $75,000 four (4) replacement vehicles; $31,500 vehicle video cameras • Public Safety Support - $28,355 tape logger • Building Inspection - $43,000 Demolition Fund; $13,000 truck Lyaw • Streets/Drainage - $30,000 Flat Bed Truck; $449,330 Street Infrastructure; $17,000 Chipper; $205,000 Drainage Infrastructure; $72,500 800 mhz radio system (1/2 in Utility Fund) • Public Works Administration - $105,000 GIS System; $20,000 Pavement Management System • Community Development - $45,000 Street Impact Fee Study; $20,000 Trail System Master Plan Fund Balance The proposed budget reflects a decrease in the undesignated Fund Balance, with a projected beginning of$1,569,172 and ending at an estimated$1,129,771. This Fund Balance represents 17.42% of estimated expenditures, within the 15% minimum but less than the 25% established by the City Council as the target level E, in our Fund Balance Policy. The proposed level is sufficient to ensure the fund's ' financial integrity. r • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 2, 1994 • (tiro' Page 7 - y Debt Service Fund Debt service expenditures have steadily escalated over the past several years, reflecting the debt issuance required for major infrastructure projects. The FY94- 95 budget reflects an increase in debt service of $284,678 over last year. Tax Rate The proposed budget reflects a total taxable value of $808,385,458 in tax year 1994, an increase of $124,442,932, or 18.19% over the taxable value currently on the rolls. The 1994 taxable value reflects $102,246,937 in new improvements since last year. The proposed budget reflects a proposed tax rate of $.4500 per $100 valuation, of which $.27385 is for general operations and maintenance and L $.17615 is for debt service. The portion of the tax rate available to support maintenance and operations is decreased by $.02747, or 9.11% from last year. The $.43912 effective tax rate in the 1994 tax year is down from the $.45558 in the 1993 tax year. The rollback tax rate for the 1994 tax year is $.49022. Utility Fund The Utility Fund revenues are projected at $4,963,600 for an increase of $1,698,068 or 52.0% in the proposed budget. Expenditures are projected at $5,248,887 for an increase of $1,846,832 or 54.3% over the FY93-94 Adopted Budget. The proposed budget does not includes any increase in water or sewer rates. The budget includes one (1) Utility Maintenance Worker, two (2) Utility Operators, and one (1) Project Accountant. The proposed budget includes an allocation of $775,000 to establish a neighborhood sewer assessment program. C Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council August 2, 1994 Page 8 3 - lk Special Revenue Fund-Parks and Recreation The proposed budget includes the special revenue fund to account for revenues and expenditures dedicated for park use. These funds are derived from the Park Dedication Fees charged to new development. The proposed budget reflects revenues of $100,000 in park dedication fees from developers, and $7,500 in interest income. Joint Use projects scheduled with the Carroll Independent School District total $23,680. Other expenditures programmed from this fund total $39,670. Parks Development Corporation The SPDC is projected to receive $616,500 in sales tax revenue and $12,500 in interest earnings. Expenditures are projected at $47,680 to fund the Park Project Manager. SPDC Debt service for FY94-95 is projected at $252,310. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The proposed budget represents progress toward a proactive approach to the operation of the City of Southlake. The scheduled equipment purchases and additional personnel provides the framework for addressing the service needs. Planning for anticipated growth drives the budget process. Sin rely, Cu . Hawk City Manager CEH/lah/kb b:BDGT9495.19[/BDGT/kb