Loading...
1998-08-15 CC Packet City of Southlake,Texas 4 MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Note that the financial report prepared by Finance Director Lou Ann Heath and the Town Square Status Report prepared by Deputy Director of Public Works Ron Harper are included in your packet under Item No. 4B-1-4 and 4B-5, respectively. If you have any questions, call Lou Ann Heath, Ron Harper, or me. 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on August 4, 1998. If you have any changes to the minutes please discuss these at the work session or notify Sandy LeGrand prior to the meeting. She will bring the amended minutes to the meeting for your consideration. 2. Agenda Item 5B. Authorize the City Manager to enter into an interlocal agreement with Tarrant County for tax collection services. For sixteen years Tarrant County has collected property taxes for the City. This renewal contract is for collection of 1998 taxes, for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1998 and ending September 30, 1999. Tarrant County has executed this type of contract with approximately 40 cities and school districts in the county. The contract in your packet is the standard contract used by the County. Although we really have no choice in the contract language (if we choose to participate), we will be advantaged considerably by continuing our agreement for the service. This contract provides terms for financial transactions, ` Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 2 of 31 disbursements, and reports. Additionally, the contract allows the City to conduct an audit of the County's collection process if we so desire. As stated in the memo from Director of Finance Lou Ann Heath, we have budgeted $3,800 for this contract. This is based on the County's $.40 fee per financial transaction (payments, refunds, adjustments, etc.). This is considerably less than the amount it would cost the City to handle this function in-house. 3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Selection of David Schwarz Associates and Urban Architecture to provide design services for Town Hall. This item will allow us to move forward with the Town Hall project. Probably all of you are aware of by now that last night, August 13, the CISD Board of Trustees voted against the lease agreement and will not be sharing space in the Town Hall. While it is unfortunate thar that we were unable to take advantage of the joint utilization opportunity, CISD's decision will allow us to move forward with plans for a library in Town Hall. As stated in Ron Harper's memo, we recommend selecting two firms to complete the architectural work for the Town Hall building. Selecting the two firms for this project will ensure Town Hall is architecturally designed and developed to fit into the overall design structure of Town Square. David Schwarz Associates, the world- renowned architect, designed the Town Square concept. Acting as the Design Architect, Schwarz Associates' primary involvement in the Town Hall project will be to use their expertise to design the building's exterior appearance and the public areas. Schwarz's involvement will ensure the continuity of the vision of Town Hall in Town Square as it develops, and will give us a unique facility that will preserve our contribution to future generations. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 3 of 31 Urban Architecture will be the Architect of Record to complete the interior design of Town Hall. They will complete all construction drawings, including preparation of all construction plans, bid documents, and construction period related issues. The next step in this process will include discussions with the two firms to refine the scope of services and complete contract documents. Once these are developed, we will bring forward a proposed fee structure to the City Council for consideration. Please contact Ron Harper if you have questions regarding this item. 4. Agenda Item No. 5D. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Freese and Nichols for the design of modifications to the (11..e Keller/Southlake pump station and design of the 30"/36" portion of the Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water System (NETCRWS). This agreement will allow us to continue our progress towards implementing the regional system, which is critical for providing a second feed for our system. The memo from Bob Whitehead provides brief historical information about our involvement with NETCRWS and explains its importance to us. Note that the total cost for designing this portion of the system is $420,786. We expect reimbursement from some of the other participating cities in the future, although the extent of the reimbursement is not yet determined. 5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Approval of fees for the Phase II portion of the professional services agreement with Freese and Nichols for the design of the West Jones Branch channel improvements. In April 1998, the City Council approved the professional Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 4 of 31 service agreement with Freese and Nichols for Phase I of this project. As outlined in the agreement, the fees for each phase of the project were to be submitted separately for your consideration. Phase I of the West Jones Branch channel improvements is close to completion and we are ready to proceed with Phase II. Keep in mind these improvements are necessary to help facilitate TxDOT's expansion of S.H. 114, particularly the Kimball Interchange. As described in the memo from Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead, the fee for the Phase II portion of the project is $89,000. This project is currently funded from the CIP budget. If City Council approves the Stormwater Drainage Utility District (SDUS) the CIP will be reimbursed from the SDUS fund. This project was discussed at the June City Council Retreat. (hir Please contact Bob Whitehead if you have questions regarding this project. 6. Agenda Item No. 5F. Authorization to advertise for bids for the construction of a sanitary sewer lift station to serve the Raintree/Shady Lane area. This item continues our efforts to provide sewer service to this area, and the memo explains the details of the project. Please feel free to contact Bob Whitehead with specific questions about the lift station. 7. Agenda Item No. 5G. Award of bid to Reynolds Asphalt, Inc. for the paving of streets in the Raintree/Shady Lane area. Five bids were received for this project. As you can see from the bid tabulation sheets, the low bidder was Reynolds Asphalt, Inc. for $299,812.80. This is a favorable bid, $18,187.20 below the budgeted amount of $318,000. The packet items prepared by Bob Whitehead include a map showing specific streets which will be paved as part of this project. Please contact Bob for more information about this item. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 (kw- Page 5 of 31 8. Agenda Item 5H. Authorization to advertise for bids for the construction of a second five million-gallon ground storage tank at Pearson Lane and F.M. 1709. The construction of the ground storage tank was originally anticipated to begin beyond the current five-year capital improvements plan. The request to move this project up on the priority list is related to the current water supply situation and the recent emergency that threatened the City's ability to supply water to its citizens. If the City Council approves this project there will be an additional 11.5 million gallons of water in storage for 1999, including the additional five million gallons at Pearson, five million gallons at T.W. King and 1.5 million gallons in the proposed Miron elevated tank, for a total storage capacity of 20 million gallons. By constructing the additional ground storage tank in FY 1999, the City's ability to handle short-term emergency situations will be greatly improved. Please contact Bob Whitehead if you have questions regarding this project. 9. Agenda Item 5I. Award of bid to ASC Pavement Markings, Inc. for the striping of Byron Nelson Parkway and Southridge Lakes Parkway and the widening of a portion of Byron Nelson Parkway. The completion of some of the development along Byron Nelson Parkway allows the City to proceed with striping the streets along the four-lane portion of Byron Nelson Parkway. Additionally, the undivided section of Byron Nelson Parkway, south of Northwood Trail will be widened to improve the current curve radius at the transition. The bid also provides for the striping of Southridge Lakes Parkway. Note that ASC Pavement Markings, Inc. was the only bid received on the project. There are several reasons, perhaps, as Bob Whitehead has pointed out in his memo. ASC proposed to complete the project at $74.163. The budget for this project was estimated at $65,000 in the CIP Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 6 of 31 budget. City Council can, of course, decline to award the bid and direct us to readvertise, but I am not sure we would gain. Given the need for the project, staff recommends you award the bid as presented. Please contact Bob Whitehead or me if you have any questions concerning this item. 10.Agenda Item 5J. Resolution No. 98-59, Extending the moratorium on sexually oriented businesses for 180 days, until February 13, 1999. The moratorium on sexually oriented businesses expired on August 4, 1998. The first moratorium was passed on November 4, 1997 for 180 days; the second was passed on April 21, 1998 for an additional 93 days. Considering the large number of ordinance revisions we have undergone recently the City did not have time to complete the review within the previous two timeframes. I recommend that this moratorium be extended 180 days to February 13, 1999 to allow ample time for the study process and ordinance revision to take place. Since this is the third moratorium recommended on this issue it is important that the revision be completed by the time the additional 180-day moratorium expires. City Attorney Analeslie Muncy, who was Dallas City Attorney when some of their provisions were adopted, will assist the work group. Councilmember Kendall has volunteered to be the Council representative. This work group will need to move forward steadily, or we will not make the deadline. In a related matter, I asked the attorneys if we could work on an ordinance dealing with the sale of drug paraphernalia, given the work of the Drug and Alcohol Committee, at the same time. (They suggest we use different folks so we do not get bogged down i.e., not the same work team members.) Please contact Karen Gandy or me with questions. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 7 of 31 11. Agenda Item No. 5K. Award of bid for Bid Package #2 (courts) for Bicentennial Park, Phase II. SPDC will consider this item on Monday. The memo from Kevin Hugman describes several options available for awarding of this bid. Ultimately, the decision will be to determine how much of Phase II expansion we wish to accomplish with this bid. The options provided by Park staff include 1) funding all courts, 2) funding only those courts included in the SPDC budget, or 3) funding the budgeted courts, plus the center court. Option#3 is staff's preference, given our intuition that building a center court in the next phase of construction would be problematic and costly since we would be required to construct it within the area that will then include existing tennis courts and pro shop. Of course, as you can see by reviewing the spreadsheets prepared by Kevin, this would require funds beyond what has been budgeted. Given that the (hir, expenditures for this project would not occur during this year's budget, one option for SPDC consideration would be to roll the additional cost into the FY98-99 budget as shown on the draft multi-year CIP presented to them at the July SPDC meeting. This would essentially allocate a portion of future SPDC bond funds to pay for the additional court and the lighting costs as discussed below. Please direct your questions to Kevin Hugman or Ben Henry. 12. Agenda Item No. 5L. Award of bid for Bid Package #2a (lighting) for Bicentennial Park, Phase II. SPDC will also consider this item at its meeting on Monday. The memo from Kevin Hugman explains the issues. Note that $85,000 of the lighting bid will be covered through the budget figures approved by SPDC for Fields #1 and #3 and not the funds budgeted for the expansion project. Kevin's spreadsheet shows the cost which would be attributed to the expansion project. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 8 of 31 This item cannot be separated from the court bid award. Action on the previous item will determine the necessary option for Bid Package #2a. Please contact Kevin with questions. 13.Agenda Item No. 5M. Award of bid for 100 GPM deep water well and well pump at Bob Jones Park. SPDC discussed this item at its July meeting and will review the bids on Monday. The memo from Kevin explains the issues. Essentially, we only received one responsive bidder for the project, with a bid of$96,650. A lower bid was received, but that contractor was not willing to meet our specifications for contract time. Note that his bid was only $573 lower than the responsive bid. If SPDC and City Council wish to award the bid at this time, staffs recommendation would be to award the bid to J.J. Biffle Water Well Drilling. We may have some time to work with, however. It appears that the drought and subsequent watering restrictions have called to question the possibility of using the soccer fields for fall games (we're meeting with representatives of the Grapevine Southlake Soccer Association to discuss the matter on Monday). Staff has walked the fields with John Levitt, and it is his opinion that it will be difficult to have game fields ready by fall - he informed us that GSSA has been looking into other options which they will pursue in anticipation of our not getting the fields on line. If they make other plans, we may have the flexibility to wait on the well, which could allow us to re-bid with a longer contract time. This might help us attract a larger number of bids and reduce the cost. We apologize for the unanswered questions, but the Thursday bid opening made it difficult to resolve all of the issues by packet time. We will make a specific recommendation to the Board on Monday and report to City Council on Tuesday. Please feel free to call Ben Henry if you have questions regarding this item. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 9 of 31 14. Agenda Item No. 7A. Resolution No. 98-58, Endorsing the petition for project improvements on U.S. 377, S.H. 114, and F.M. 1938 recommended by the Metroport Cities Partnership to the Texas Department of Transportation to be presented September 24. 1998. This item has been placed first on the regular agenda due to the interest generated. We went ahead and listed this as a public hearing, since there will be many in the public who will want to be heard. There are many people who have expressed their opposition to this project, but it appears that a substantial majority of the people who live on the roadway support its improvement as it has been proposed. This may be because they know more of the facts. There are many rumors and misstatements floating about, and most of those opposing the roadway have not attended meetings where the proper information was disseminated. We have put together a packet of material for your information that should help you when you receive questions. Some of this we have previously shared with you, and some we just received from NCTCOG this morning. The packet sleeve contains the following: (1) Proposed typical cross sections (140ft and 94ft) and existing cross section, (2) Mobility 2020: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan Executive Summary. (See esp. pp. 10-11), (3) Partners in Mobility Executive Summary, March 30, 1998. (See esp. pg. 4), (4) Regional Thoroughfare Plan, Dec. 1994. (See esp. the large map), (5) Thoroughfare Plan for North Central Texas, April 1977, (6) Executive Summary to Thoroughfare plan for North Central Texas, April 1977. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 10 of 31 Greg Last also prepared a summary of questions and answers which has been included in the Council packet behind the resolution. During the meeting, I will present the background on the petition, and Greg Last/Bob Whitehead will present the plan, etc., prior to the public hearing. I expect some comments to the effect of "why is Metroport doing this in our town," or similar. Remember that Metroport submitted the petition on our behalf in order to show sub-regional (northeast Tarrant County/southern Denton County) support for our efforts to seek state funding for our roadways. It has been demonstrated that the wide-area support provided through Metroport has enhanced our efforts. Therefore, whenever one City in the Metroport area has had a needed project, others have supported. As Greg pointed out in his summary of questions and answers, the Metroport Cities Partnership is a non-profit corporation which is comprised of eight (8) area cities, two school districts, area chambers of commerce, public utilities, large and small business enterprises, and other related organizations. The purpose of the partnership is to work collectively on public and private initiatives affecting economic development and quality of life in the Northeast Tarrant County (Metroport) region. It has been the practice of Metroport Cities Partnership to participate together whenever possible in providing public services such as radio communication. public safety, water and sewer service and highway construction. To this end, it has been a means to strengthen inter-governmental cooperation. The organization has been incorporated for ten years. L • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 11 of 31 Recall that in 1996 the coordinated Metroport effort to improve S.H. 114 combined public and private funds donated to Metroport to develop a proposal to the Texas Transportation Commission to fund the S.H. 114 project. Our petition was successful. As you recall, the Texas Transportation Commission gave top priority to four of the 114 projects and Priority 2 status to another project, totaling more than $66 million in state funding over a three year period for the improvements along S.H. 114. Metroport funds were left over, and these are to be used to develop additional funding requests for S.H. 114 and for other roadways that connect to S.H. 114 in the Metroport area, such as U.S. 377 and F.M. 1938. The remaining donations obtained to fund the Metroport 114 Partnership initiative will be used to fund this trip to Austin on September 24, 1998. Another question I expect is something similar to "why are we in such a hurry," or "why are we trying to rush this through," etc., "without letting people know"? While it is true that this F.M. 1938 portion of our current petition has not received the media attention that the 1996 petition for S.H. 114 received, it has been talked about and has been in the newspapers. It was discussed in our work session on February 10, 1998. If you look at your March 13, 1998 City Council meeting memo from me, you will see an attached newspaper article on the proposal. (See attached hereto.) There were in fact several articles. The point is that it didn't just suddenly happen. We began pursuing this possible project when it became apparent that the state would be receiving additional transportation funds this next year. Given the process of how state projects are approved for funding, we thought that F.M. 1938 might stand a chance to get funded now, while it might not later. Without getting into too much detail, the following factors are at play: L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 12 of 31 • F.M. 1938 extension from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 has been on the regional plan since 1977. • It would be relatively easy to engineer/design/construct, and is a relatively small project (3.6 miles; approximately $12-16 million state dollars). • Projects that are ready to be funded will likely receive priority, and while there are many projects in the Dallas and Fort Worth TxDOT regional offices that are awaiting funding, ours could probably be ready before most of the others for these "new" dollars. • Once the other projects in the region are ready for funding, ours would not likely score as high in priority rankings when compared with them. • Given the above, even though we know Randol Mill Road is going to get considerably more traffic in the next few years, it is not likely to get state funding (after the next year or so) for many years to come. Recall it took us Cpe more than 10 years to get construction funding approved for both F.M. 1709 and S.H. 114. • If we do not obtain the funding from the state for these improvements, it will cost the City of Southlake over $4 million (using today's cost standards) to improve Randol Mill, excluding right-of-way. There would also be future additional costs associated with obtaining right-of-way since the properties along Randol Mill are likely to be developed by the time the City would schedule the project. Additionally, the improvements would be completed according to the City's thoroughfare plan instead of the state's standards, which would mean no 24 ft tree-lined median. 15. Agenda Item No. 7B. Ordinance No. 705, 2nd reading, Abandoning the right-of- way known as Brittain Drive located in the Brittany Place Addition. Council approved this item on first reading at the August 4 City Council meeting. As we mentioned in the memo for that packet, this item was placed on the agenda at the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 13 of 31 request of two of the property owners adjacent to Brittain Drive. The reasons for their request are well documented in the application, which is attached to the memo from Bob Whitehead. Note that all adjacent property owners are identified and have been notified of the application. To our knowledge, none are opposed to the request. (Note that the exhibit describing the utility easement has been provided with this packet.) 16. Agenda Item No. 7C. ZA 98-071, Site Plan for Proposed Lot 3R2, Block 1, Georgetown Park. There are no unresolved issues regarding this application. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) with the modifications to the Site Plan Review Summary as noted in the Staff Report. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions concerning this application. 17. Agenda Item No. 7D. ZA 98-081, Site Plan for proposed Lot 3R1, Block 1, Georgetown Park. This site is directly north of the previous agenda item and is the final phase for the Georgetown Park Development. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) with modification to the Site Plan Review as noted in the Staff Report. They further recommended that the applicant meet with Landscape Administrator Keith Martin to see if some of the landscape parking islands could be relocated to save healthy existing trees on the site. The applicant has met with Mr. Martin and recommendations have been made. Note, however, that these recommendations are not reflected in the plan submitted. Staff will attempt to make an exhibit available prior to the City Council meeting. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 14 of 31 18. Agenda Item No. 7E. ZA 98-079. Concept Plan for Lot 3, Block 3, Diamond Circle Estates. This site is located at the northwest corner of Diamond and Southlake Boulevard, east of the Remax office building. Approximately one year ago a site plan was presented proposing a two story office and was opposed by residents of Diamond Circle Estates and the owner of the Remax building. The current applicant has met with the adjacent residents and the Remax building owner to resolve the issues of the previous plan. The owner of the Remax building has agreed in writing to allow joint use of the Remax driveway so that this site will not require any additional curb cuts. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) with modification to the Concept Plan Review as noted in the Staff Report. Commissioner Peebles dissented having concerns with building appearance as a result of the applicant having presented preliminary building renderings to the adjacent owners. No elevations or renderings have been presented (ime to the City and are not required with submittal of a Concept Plan. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions concerning this application. 19. Agenda Item No. 7F. Ordinance No. 480-287. 2nd Reading. (ZA 98-075), Rezoning for Loch Meadow Estates (originally submitted as Wildwood). There are no unresolved issues surrounding the rezoning of this property. The City Council approved first reading of this request (6-0) on August 4, 1998. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions concerning this application. 20. Agenda Item No. 7G. ZA 98-058. Site Plan for French Square Office Complex. This site is located on the south side of Southlake Boulevard and west of the Senior Activity Center. There were no unresolved issues with this plan during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The Commission approved the plan (6-0) with modifications to the Site Plan Review as noted in the Staff Report. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions concerning this application. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 15 of 31 21. Agenda Item No. 8A. ZA 98-083, Plat Showing of Lots 12, 13, and 14, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition. This request is the plat for the previous agenda item. There were no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) subject to the Plat Review Summary. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions concerning this application. 22. Agenda Item No. 8B. Sign Ordinance No. 704 (advertised as Sign Ordinance No. 506), 1st reading, proposing changes in General Sign Provisions, Specific Sign Regulations, and other miscellaneous items. After holding two work sessions, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) with the modifications noted on the memo from Comprehensive Planner Stefanie Sarakaitis. The Commission directed staff to prepare exhibits showing alternative means of measurement for monument signs and we are currently preparing these exhibits with intention of handing them out at the meeting. Two written responses were received and are included in your packet; one from Bruce Roberts, representative for the builder's association and the second from Bill Kemp. The proposal submitted by Mr. Kemp was addressed by the Commission during the work sessions. 23. Agenda Item No. 8C. Ordinance No. 480-286, 1st reading, (ZA 98-073), Rezoning for Sheltonwood. This item was tabled August 4, 1998 at the request of the applicant to the August 18, 1998 City Council meeting. There are no unresolved issues surrounding the rezoning of this property. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0). Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions concerning this application. L * Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 16 of 31 24. Agenda Item No. 8D. ZA 98-086, Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 17R through 27R, and Lot 28R (Common Green 45), Block 42, Timarron Addition - Crescent Royale. The purpose of this request is to abandon a drainage easement which was dedicated within the limits of the floodplain on the original plat and to reflect a change in the limits of the floodplain based on the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) which the City submitted to FEMA at the request of the applicant. Note that the Letter of Map Revision has now been received by the applicant. The engineering staff (Charlie Thomas) does not see any engineering problems with the release of the drainage easement or relocation of the floodplain limits as proposed. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0). Feel free to contact Charlie should you have questions about drainage. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions concerning the technical platting aspects of this application. (lire 25. Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution No. 98-57, Appointment to the Parks and Recreation Board. Parks and Recreation Board Member Doug Fierce resigned in June because he moved out of the area. Resolution No. 98-57 allows for the appointment of a member to the board to fill the unexpired term (expires May 1999). A total of seven citizens have submitted applications including the following individuals: Larry Abernathy, Elaine Cox, Chris Gonser, Jeff Kaylor, Amy Radford-Klapp, Tad Stephens, and Lisa Stokdyk. If you have any questions, please contact Sandy LeGrand. 26. Agenda Item No. 9B. Resolution 98-56, Appointments to the Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District Board. As noted in Shana Yelverton's memo, the Council needs to appoint three members to the Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors. In order to achieve staggered terms for Board members, three of the initial Directors were appointed for one-year terms. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 17 of 31 Directors whose terms are expiring include President Andrew Wambsganss, Pam McCain, and Bob Mundlin, and all have expressed an interest in continuing to serve. Please let Shana know if you have any questions about this item. 27. Agenda Item No. 10A. Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic management initiatives. You will recall that a similar process was included in the executive summary for the "Traffic Management" item for the June Retreat. Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead proposed this process at the Retreat as a means of responding to neighborhood requests for traffic control devices, e.g., stop signs. He believes that if Council adopts such a process, it will aid staff in managing the expectations of the neighborhood when they approach the City about traffic management in their neighborhood. Note that the process described in your packet has been modified slightly to incorporate requests for other traffic management initiatives. In light of the requests we receive for these items, we believe your endorsement of this policy will improve our ability to process these requests. Please note that if an initiative does not meet the state warrants in the requested location, our staff cannot place a traffic control device. This is why the policy incorporates the warrant study. Placement of a non-warranted sign can only occur at Council direction, which we will discuss further on Tuesday evening. In the meantime, if you have questions about this process, please call Bob Whitehead or me. 28. Agenda Item No. 10B. Neighborhood requests for placement of stop signs and other traffic control devices in the Timber Lake and Southridge Lakes subdivisions. This item has been placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmembers Fawks Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 18 of 31 and Kendall. You will recall that representatives from the Timber Lake Homeowners Association appeared before the Council during public forum at the June 16, 1998 City Council meeting, requesting a number of items related to traffic management within their subdivision. Council directed staff to hire an engineering firm to conduct a warrant study on the issues raised by the HOA. Staff now has the study report, which has been included in your packet. As discussed previously, our engineering staff could incur legal liability for placement of traffic control devices at non-warranted locations; as such, Public Works staff has not installed signage, which did not meet the warrants per the study. Staff has, however, installed a number of "children at play" and "pedestrian warning" signs, and a warranted stop sign per the engineering study has already been installed at the "T" intersection of Lake Forest Drive and Shorecrest (hrie Drive. We will be able to discuss the other aspects of the Timber Lakes HOA request during this item. Please see the attached packet materials prepared by Bob Whitehead, which delineate the specific Timber Lake HOA requests. A map has been included for your information. FYI, it is our intention that your action be geared specifically to the map. Southridge Lakes submitted a request to the City in 1995 to place stop signs at the intersections of Southridge Lake Parkway and Brazos Court, Brazos Drive, and Sabine Court/Pecos Drive. Stop signs were placed to create a four-way stop at Sabine Court/Pecos Drive at direction of Council. Based upon their 1997 follow up request, it is our understanding that the homeowners association would like Council to further consider placement of signs at Brazos Drive. Again, a map has been included with your packet item. If you wish to approve this item, please approve the map, which specifies the location of the devices. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 L, Page 19 of 31 29. Agenda Item No. IOC. Ordinance No. 707, 1st reading, Amending Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code, designating the speed limit as 25 miles per hour for neighborhood streets in the Timber Lake and Southridge Lakes subdivisions. This item would normally be placed under agenda item number 8, "ordinances, first readings and related items," but given the relationship to the previous two items, we have placed it on the agenda as item 10C. Your approval of this item will reduce the speed on all streets in these neighborhoods from 30 mph to 25 mph. This ordinance has been prepared at Council direction in response to neighborhood requests for speed limit reductions in these specific neighborhoods, however, it is likely we will hear from others in the future. We had intended to place this item on the agenda as a discussion item only, since there is some question as to whether or not the City can legally lower the state-mandated 30-mph speed limit. We have not completed our research. Our attorneys are reviewing this issue in detail and will provide a briefing of state law provisions during Executive Session on Tuesday evening. (FYI, we have excerpted and highlighted the key provisions from the statues and have attached hereto.) We know the ordinance will require modifications prior to second reading, but we should be able to do so even if we have to get "creative" in our "whereas" statements. 30. Agenda Item No. 10D. Sign Ordinance Appeal for a sign at 2100 W. Northwest Highway, Park Place. A variance is needed by the applicant primarily because the property of the shopping center lies in two cities. Chuck Bloomberg, in consultation with Greg Last, determined that this would technically be an "off site" sign, since the sign will be on a different platted lot than the shopping center. The platting is directly related to the city limit lines. If the shopping center were located on one platted lot in Southlake, the proposed sign would meet current ordinance requirements and, therefore, not require a variance. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 20 of 31 Note that this sign, which is a freestanding sign, would not be permitted under the new ordinance even if it were not considered an off-site sign. Freestanding signs are prohibited in the proposed ordinance. 31.Agenda Item No. 10E. Sign Ordinance Appeal for Woodland Heights Addition, 1721-1725 East Southlake Boulevard. As noted in the memo, the application received from Bootstrap Investments does not reduce the size of the sign by four feet. Previously, the applicant indicated they might be willing to make the reduction to minimize site distance problems. Questions about the application should be directed to Director Campbell or Paul Ward. 32. Agenda Item No. 10F. Resolution No. 98-55, Interlocal Agreement with the City of Grapevine for library services. The City of Southlake has participated in the (hr., Grapevine Library System since 1991 through an interlocal agreement contributing an annual sum to the library system for the purchase of books. Southlake's total contribution has been $72,500 over the past seven years for the purchase of 4,136 books for the City of Southlake. On February 17, Southlake City Council authorized staff to work with Colleyville and Grapevine to pursue an interlocal agreement for the development of a three-city library system [note this is not to be mistaken for facility] with the understanding that Southlake would eventually build its own separate library facility (which will now be located in the new Town Hall). This compromise was a result of research and discussion during the previous twenty-four months concerning library services for Southlake. This interlocal agreement reflects the need for Southlake to continue to participate in the Grapevine Regional Library System with a fee structure established at $25.00 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 21 of 31 for each library card issued to a Southlake resident. These new parameters will allow Southlake to pay our share of the operating costs as we agreed. Shelli Siemer's memo points out that, currently, the City of Grapevine has a list of over 7,000 Southlake library cards for the Grapevine Library. In 1997, over 100 new library cards were issued to Southlake residents every month. What they do not know is how many are active. They will be able to tell us this by October or November, when their new computer system comes on line. They will not bill us until they get the new system installed. When Southlake residents come in to use their card, the card will be "activated." Once a month, or perhaps quarterly, we will receive a bill based on the number of cards activated during the period. There has been some discussion by Councilmembers, Park Board members and others about the possibility of funding one card for each household that requests (ire one, and providing that any additional cards per household would be purchased by the users. If you think about it, this is a prime example of what is meant when we talk about a "user fee." Should we do this, it would be the only citywide service of this type in which we charge a user fee. (For example, many cities charge a user fee to groups using ballfields including the ball associations.) As we start our library program this could raise questions of equity when we compare funding for library services to park and recreation services. Also, it is considered a "rite of passage" for youngsters to receive their first library card, and while the $25 additional fee would not be a problem in Southlake (most likely) it still creates an inequity that you should consider. It is Roger Nelson's belief, which I share, that the process of billing he proposes would not result in as high a bill as would other alternatives. Please direct your library questions to me. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 22 of 31 33. Agenda Item No. 11A. Proposed S.H. 114 and F.M. 1709 Highway Intersection Bond Project. Staff met with representatives from the North Central Texas Council of Governments to discuss potential funding opportunities we might take advantage of in order to pursue the deceleration lanes and other improvements along the highways. I plan to discuss this with you during the meeting, and hope that time permits a discussion of plans to educate the community about our bond project. Please let me know if you have any questions on this item. 34.Agenda Item No. 11B. Proposed paint concepts for the Miron elevated storage tank. There have been a number of different public meetings to obtain input regarding the painting of the Miron elevated storage tank. There was no consensus developed regarding which paint concept the neighbors preferred. The proposed painting concepts and their related budget impacts will be presented to you at City Council meeting. If you have questions, please contact Bob Whitehead. 35.Agenda Item No. 11C. Ordinance No. 706, An ordinance amending Chapter 16, "Solid Waste" of the Southlake City Code, related to commercial and construction garbage. Note that your packet contains a cover memo from Shana Yelverton previously provided by Darcey Imm, and the ordinance which includes the redline/strikeout text from Chapter 16 of the City Code. This item was in the packet for your August 4 meeting so that it could be addressed prior to Darcey's departure, but time did not permit discussion. You will recall that this ordinance will require all commercial and construction sites within the City to be collected by the designated City Contractor. As we have discussed before, the commercial sites are more profitable and offset the costs of residential collection. These issues, coupled with our need to have the ability to regulate collection of commercial collection, prompt us to recommend this approach to you. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 23 of 31 This ordinance will also address the use of disposable (e.g., garbage bags) containers by non-residential customers. By requiring all non-residential customers to utilize non-disposable containers, the problem with numerous bags and other containers along our major thoroughfares will be reduced. It has been placed on your agenda again as a reminder that it is ready for placement on the September 1 agenda for first reading, unless you want us to move in a different direction. Questions about the proposed ordinance may now be directed to Shana Yelverton. 36. Agenda Item No. 11D. Drainage Ordinance. This item has been placed on the agenda as a discussion item to begin addressing the concerns related to the current drainage ordinance. Some recent areas of concern include building in the floodplain, erosion control, and drainage between the subdivisions. I would like the City Council to provide direction to staff on this matter. This discussion should also include consideration of creating a work group to include City Council members, Planning & Zoning Commission members and staff. I believe Councilmember Edmondson and P&Z Chairperson Creighton have indicated they would participate. Please let us know if other of you would like to assist. Other Items of Interest 37.Budget Work sessions/Effective Tax Rate Issues - The budget work sessions are scheduled for Wednesday, August 19 from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and Thursday, August 20 from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. The meetings will be held at the Senior Activity Center. This should provide us with enough time to collectively answer Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 24 of 31 your questions and enable you to proceed with the approval process (1st reading, September 1 and 2nd reading, September 15). Within the next week, the City will publish its "1998 Property Tax Rates in the City of Southlake" in the Fort Worth Star Telegram. (A copy of the notice is included). State law requires this notice. You may have already read other taxing jurisdictions' notices in the paper. The notice reports three tax rates, 1997 actual tax rate of $.422, 1998 effective tax rate of $.38599, and 1998 rollback tax rate of $.35875. The effective tax rate is the rate that will generate the same amount of property tax dollars as the previous year, excluding new construction and annexations, when the two years are compared. The 1998-99 proposed budget is based on a tax rate of $.422, with $.30763 for (re maintenance and operations and $.11437 for debt service. Because this rate exceeds the effective tax rate, the City will be required to hold a public hearing on the tax rate, and publish two additional notices in the paper. This is what we have done the past several years, even though the tax rate has remained the same or decreased since FY1991-92. What is different this year is that the rollback tax rate is less than the effective and proposed tax rate. As part of our plan to utilize accumulated dollars in the City's general obligation debt service fund, the FY1997-98 debt tax rate component of the total tax rate has been reduced from last year's $.17461 to the proposed $.11437. Truth-in-taxation laws permit a taxing jurisdiction to establish a debt tax rate sufficient to cover debt payment, but limits the maintenance and operations component to an 8% increase over the dollars generated in the previous year. If the City adopts a tax rate that exceeds the rollback tax rate voters may petition the City to roll back the tax rate $.06325 to $.35875. This translates to a reduction of Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 25 of 31 $1.2 million in the proposed FY1998-99 General Fund budget, as each penny on the tax rate is equal to $190,683. Given the magnitude of the services that the City is planning now and in the future as outlined in the multi-year financial plan, it is important to maintain the tax rate at the proposed $.422. Any reduction in the tax rate now will create difficulties in the future if a tax rate increase becomes necessary. 38. Status of Drainage Complaints - Following are some updates on recent drainage- related complaints. Feel free to contact Public Works Director Bob Whitehead if you have questions or would like additional information. • McMillian - Mission/Diamond Sewer projects - The sewer installation project in Mission Hills has experienced several delays in construction because of the (lbw weather and unanticipated problems in boring. The McMillians are dissatisfied about the length of time it is taking to complete the project and upset about damage to their sprinkler system around the area the contractor is working. Public Works Inspector Walter Shore personally repaired the sprinkler heads several times in an attempt to correct the problem. The project plans called for boring under the driveway at the Brown residence, the next door neighbor to the McMillians. The contractor is installing several bores for this project to avoid damaging existing driveways and landscaping within the right-of-way. This boring was attempted three times unsuccessfully due to the large amounts of subsurface rock. The bore pits were left open with standard construction fence protecting the area. Apparently a dog went under the construction fence and slipped into a pit that is four to five feet in depth. Luckily, there were no injuries to the dog or the resident who retrieved the dog. As a result of the unsuccessful boring attempts, the contractor will install the • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 L, Page 26 of 31 sewer line by open cut or trenching, requiring the removal of sections in the driveway and landscaping. • Quinn - Mission/Diamond Sewer projects - Ms. Quinn's property is located in the Diamond Estates subdivision. Approximately ten feet of a 48" concrete drainage pipe is located in the back of her property. The pipe then runs into the newly developed Foxborough Subdivision. Ms. Quinn is concerned with the safety hazards related to the concrete drainage because it has been left open. While Deputy Director of Public Works Charlie Thomas assessed the situation, the developer for the Foxborough subdivision appeared at the site and stated that he has been working with Construction Inspector Walter Shore since the middle of July to resolve the issue. On July 8, the City received a copy of the proposed fencing plans. The developer has agreed to pay for a chain link fence along the property located in the Foxborough Subdivision if the City will pay for the portion of the fence in the Diamond Estates Subdivision. The cost to the city will be approximately $468 to pay for one-third of the total cost of the entire fencing. This is scheduled to be completed on Thursday August 20. • Cosgrove - Shumaker Lane - The issues surrounding Shumaker Lane include street and drainage problems. In 1971, the City Council approved the rezoning of the Shumaker property from agricultural to residential. This approval was contingent upon installing a gravel road the length of the property. Shumaker Lane still remains a gravel road and continues to be maintained as such. Mr. Cosgrove is under the impression the agreement specified the road to be paved. Our research indicates there are no known documents supporting this claim. Additionally, in late 1988 the City began installing a storm water drainage system at the end of Shumaker Lane, across to Dove Road. The project was halted because of legal issues obtaining right-of-way. The resulting legal Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 27 of 31 entanglement lasted 3-4 years. (Mayor Pro-Tem Evans will I'm sure be able to recall the "Garrett" lawsuit.) Public Works Director Bob Whitehead met with Mr. Cosgrove this week to discuss the continuing drainage problems. Currently, Charlie Thomas and Angela Turner are reviewing engineering concepts to provide for adequate drainage along Shumaker Lane. One of the first issues to address will include acquiring the easements because the City does not have right-of-way along the road. The drainage problem will need to be resolved prior to paving, but I do not relish reopening the legal issue. The paving issue can be resolved by including it in the neighborhood-paving program if the City Council so desires. • Burnitt/Mediterraneo. As you recall from previous discussions, at the time of Lir development there was a drainage swale located through the back of Mr. Mediterraneo's property designed to allow for proper storm water run off. Mr. Mediterraneo filled the swale because he was dissatisfied with the length of time the water remained in his yard. This "redesign" resulted in drainage problems for the property owner (Mr. Burnitt) directly behind the Mediterraneo's and directly upstream (the Finns) from the Mediterraneo's. Since I met with the property owners, Deputy Director of Public Works Charlie Thomas has met with them to resolve this issue. Last week a survey crew took the elevations, which are currently being reviewed to determine the proper grading needed for adequate drainage for all parties involved. The resolution of this issue may involve additional property owners. We'll keep you posted. • Mr. Andrup - Timberlake Erosion Concern - At the time of development an earthen channel was designed to run behind the properties in the Lake Crest Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 28 of 31 subdivision. The channel was intended to prevent drainage from going onto the lots. The drought has affected the growth of grass along the channel resulting in erosion. In Mr. Andrup's property the soil is coming out from under the fence in the back part of his yard. An immediate response to the problem will be to place erosion control screens along the channel. A more permanent solution includes filling dirt in the areas where erosion has occurred and re-seeding the channel. This will be done in the fall when drought conditions are likely to be over. 39. Fire Accreditation Program. Under the leadership of Director Campbell and Deputy Director Garland Wilson, the Fire Services Division has undertaken the effort to become accredited through the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI). The accreditation process is comprehensive (as described in the attached memo from Director Campbell), and is intended to promote agency improvement through self-assessment. Garland and his staff have prepared for this process for over a year, and this week have hosted a team of fire officials whose job is to independently assess our ability to meet the objectives we have established, as well as those national standards considered applicable to all agencies. These "benchmarks" provide a means of assessing our strengths and weaknesses. The review team completed their work yesterday and will prepare a recommendation. We hope to hear something definite soon. 40. Bicentennial Park Groundbreakini. The groundbreaking ceremony for Bicentennial Park Expansion Phase II is scheduled for Friday, August 21 at 9:00 a.m. at the Bicentennial Park parking lot which is accessed from FM 1709. A continental breakfast will be served at the ceremony, which will feature brief comments, by the Mayor, SPDC President Scott Martin and Park Board Chair Vicki Johnson. You Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 29 of 31 may have already received an invitation in the mail. Please be sure to RSVP to Christel Bartlett at extension 821 no later than Monday, August 17, 1998 so she can make appropriate plans. Note that this phase of the expansion will include the tennis courts and pro shop. There has been considerable discussion regarding the hiring of a tennis pro to run the tennis center, and we have even heard that the Southlake Tennis Association, now known as NETT, has been accepting resumes! This begs the question: how do we intend to operate our tennis center? Do we plan to hire a pro as a city employee? Do we plan to contract the management of the center to a company or individual? In order to make a recommendation to the City Council, staff has conducted research to determine how area cities run their programs. Please see the preliminary survey data, which has been attached hereto. Philosophically, I am not opposed to contracting the management of the center to a company, organization or individual. The only concern I would have is giving up "control" of the center, however, if we select the right contractor this in itself is not necessarily a problem. In short, we will be bringing a specific recommendation on this issue to you in the near future. In the meantime, please let me or Interim Director of Parks and Recreation Kevin Hugman know if you have questions or comments. 41. Bomb Threat on Tuesday. The memo in the packet from Director Campbell describes the details of the incident. The call came in around 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday morning, and DPS immediately contacted the Northeast Bomb Squad to investigate. Note that a similar threat was called in at DFW Airport at the same time. Questions about this issue should be directed to Director Campbell. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 30 of 31 42. Update on After School Program. On Wednesday, August 5, Parks and Recreation staff facilitated a meeting between the YMCA and Durham principal Mark Terry. Mr. Terry had also interviewed other child care providers, such as Children's World, and was planning to make a recommendation to CISD Superintendent Dr. Ted Gillum later that week. In the meeting, staff indicated that whoever the provider was to be, we would want to work closely with them to ensure a smooth transition for the parents and children. As of this week, CISD has not made a determination of who they will choose to take over the program from the City, but they have narrowed their choice to the YMCA and Children's World. Mr. Terry indicated he wanted to meet again with both organizations prior to a final decision. In any event, the City will begin the Le, program and still plan to be able to transition in mid-fall. We have 38 children registered for the program as of Wednesday, August 12. The maximum number of children for the program was set at 60, based on staffing levels. 43. Economic Development Activities. Following are some recent activities from the Economic Development staff. Contact Kate Barlow or Director Last if you have questions or would like additional information. • Attached is the August 1998 Chamber of Commerce report including the July 1998 OED Monthly Fact Column that is distributed to local print media and the Chamber. • Recent article featuring Southlake project. Attached is an article from The Business Press highlighting the proposed French Square Office Complex. Also, Crown Books, with an outlet in Village Center, has recently announced plans to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting August 18, 1998 Page 31 of 31 close all of its Texas stores due to Chapter 11 reorganization. Staff is not aware of a tentative closing date for the Southlake store. 44.Other items attached to my memo include: • Calendar of Events • Letters of appreciation CE= Staff Extension Numbers: Barlow, Kate, Economic Development Specialist, ext. 776 Bloomberg, Chuck, Plans Examiner, ext. 747 Campbell, Billy, Director DPS, ext. 730 Carpenter, Chris, Planner, ext. 866 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, City Engineer, ext. 779 Hawk, Curtis E., ext. 701 Heath, Lou Ann, Director of Finance, ext. 716 Henry, Ben, Parks Planning and Construction Superintendent, ext. 824 Hugman, Kevin, Interim Parks and Recreation Director, ext. 757 Imm, Darcey, Assistant to the City Manager, ext. 759 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Last, Greg, Community Development Director, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 Jackson, Malcolm, DPS Administrative Coordinator, ext. 726 Safranek, Lauren, Director of Human Resources, ext. 836 Sarakaitis, Stefanie, Comprehensive Planner, ext. 753 Thomas, Charlie, Deputy Director of Public Works, ext. 814 Wilson, Garland, Deputy Director Fire Services, ext. 735 Whitehead, Bob, Director of Public Works, ext. 740 Whitehead, Nona, Community Services Coordinator, ext. 834 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 M:\WD-FILES\CEH\MEETINGS\98-08-18.doc rgen ' rabic Mayor and Members of City Council da Item Comments and Other Items of Interest h 13, 1998 Page 10 against in a high risk incident. The surprise exercise involved calling in a fire, with management stationed in areas to observe the response and record the results. Much of the evaluation was focused on issues such as response times, information accuracy, and appropriateness of tactical decisions. This exercise was unique in that it was live and unannounced, and it provided an excellent opportunity to evaluate our ability to respond to an incident. 24.Crime Control Board of Directors Meeting. The next meeting of the Board is scheduled for April 1 in the Council Chamber at City Hall. The two items of consideration/discussion will be the administrative services contract with the City and a presentation by Director Campbell on the Uniform Crime Report. Note that the Board will also discuss land acquisition in Executive Session. We are hoping to move very quickly on tying up property for the facilities. (NeT 25. Mid Year Review/June Retreat. As noted in my last memo to you, mark your calendar for the Mid Year Review, scheduled for March 24, 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Also, the June retreat is tentatively scheduled for Thursday June 25 and Friday June 26. We expect the schedule to be from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Thursday and for a full day on Friday. Please let us know if these dates are inconvenient for you. :D 26.FM 1938 Update. Last Thursday, March 5, the Mayor, Bob Whitehead and I met with County Commissioner Glen Whitley and his staff, Lyle Dresher and Keller staff, Richard Kuhlman of Maguire Thomas Partners, Larry Cain of Hillwood Development, and representatives of Freese and Nichols to discuss the construction of FM 1938. The meeting allowed us to present the proposed alignment of the road, and to assure Commissioner Whitley's support of the project. Yesterday, Commissioner Whitley accompanied a group including representatives of the City of Southlake, City of Keller, _ (4., prMayor and Members of City Council r m Comments and Other Items of Interest 1998 and Town of Westlake in making a presentation to the Texas Department of Transportation District Engineer in Fort Worth. The Fort Worth District is supportive of our proposal. We still have some work to do and we will keep you informed of progress. FYI, attached hereto is a newspaper article about the meeting yesterday. It appears that the Town of Westlake notified the newspaper and invited the reporter to the meeting. This is not something we usually do when we are attempting to work through the process in order to bring something forward to TxDOT. It indicates the "paranoia" that Westlake has when it comes to the City of Southlake and MTP. 27. Southlake Sister Cities will be hosting a student delegation from Toyoma at the end of this month. The group of three adults and seven students will arrive the evening of Thursday March 26 and will stay in Southlake until the following Tuesday. The group will stay with f i host families in the community, and will have many planned activities such as visiting the schools and going to Six Flags. A pot luck dinner is scheduled for Sunday March 29 at 6:30 p.m. The dinner will be held at Carroll High School. and invitations will be mailed next week. On a related note, Texas Sister Cities had its second organizational meeting this past Wednesday at the Fort Worth International Center. Over 25 individuals from throughout the state attended. The majority of time was spent brainstorming and identifying possible projects and goals for the organization. Six committees were established: Membership, Organizational Relations, Information Technology, Education, Culture, and Development. The group plans to meet again in May, however, the date and location were not determined. We will inform you when the date has been set. 28.Southlake Youth Action Commission (SYAC) - update on upcoming activities. , _ as cities , ,.. , plan Fort Worth. ush RoadFarm Road 1709 is hero . congested.city officials said -. .. From Page 1 terday. About 32.000 motorist>�- O eLit alID use it each day—about the of the pressure up in that part of traffic count as Denton Hi ,? the Metroplex that is really start- way/U.S. 377 — many of ing to feel some heat," Tarrant to get to Texas 114, Denton; armroad. County Commissioner Glen Highway or other southbount Whitley said. mutes,they said. "its The project would cost an ••We're already seeing back" ' • estimated S8.2 million. Officials ups vn 1709, and if we don't :, orth-south 1938 artery from the three cities said they something, it's going to g' ' want to take the to the worse," " Southlake City ,uted to ease congestion- Texas Transportation Commis- Curtis Hawk said. "We'd like t sion in June.If the three-member see it done sooner than later." - ` board signs off on the project, it BY DaVE NELSON Star-Telegram Scarf venterwould be slated for funding in All three cities involved, When work or an urge to shop draws residents of 2002. which officials said would likely -theast Tarrant County's insulated northern edge Farm Road 1938, also known pick up a small share of the cost, 3 the ginding traffic mix along Loop 820 and Air- : as Davis Boulevard, extends in expanding Farm Road 1938, t F --�y, they look for the path of least resis-. from Northeast Loop 820 in support the plan. But some con- _ • acre. North Richland Hills north to cerns were voiced by official • tr are Promised extension Farm Road 1709, where it from Westlake, which:req '_ m at best, and • : Tmpbg-s "`sr �r becomes a dead end. all roads to have curves. ; th more and ; :Club -• a- The proposed 3.6-mile eaten- "We don't want a racetrt are residents I .� 1; �1r• sion project would make the road through the center of town." sat - a ® , "103• . contiguous and feed traffic onto Dave Brown, chairman of the .lethouses in 2• :''''5.; ' -_ let cities such ( -"y�: Precinct Line Road in North Westlake First Committee, who" Keller and 'i :g ; i, Richland Hills, where state crews stood in at the meeting for Scott Juthlake, the ' s are expected to complete a Bradley, who is fighting in court. attlenecks are •d : Clore ..,j� .�' widening project this year to to remain the town' mayor. - oving-closer to .: =, .1 , make that road a six-lane thor- 3me. : Proposed road oughfare with a turn lane all the To keep traffic slow,Westlake' West--_ • extension in In an attempt • way south to Airport Freeway. does not allow linear roads. open more lake ' Northeast Tarrant p County. City officials said the Farm Transportation officials said they ,nes for south- - Road 1938 extension would give would work with the town to ound motorists. 1938 ;motorists more southbound make sure the extension con- t'C9� options and could help relieve forms to Westlake's master plan: fficials in : �� seller. Southlake 1' - . South4V congestion for those traveling to Transportation officials also•4aid .nd Westlake are and from Texas Motor Speedway the speed limit on the road would-- )ressing for state S T•i•ee°°'•Tor Moos off Interstate 35W in far north be 45 mph. Honey to turn that can -;arm Road 1938 into a north-south artery -elieve Texas 114 and prevent southbound motorists . from causing traffic jams on Farm Road 1709. City officials envision a four-lane thoroughfare with a median that will extend from Texas 114 south thro h Westlake. Southlake and Keller and into 'o :bland Hills. they said yesterday at a meet- . Texas Department of Transportation offi- cials in Fort Worth. "I think th:s is a good opportunity to relieve some (More on ROAD on Page 4) - 1998 Property Tax Rates in the City of Southlake This notice concerns 1998 property tax rates for the City of Southlake. It presents information about three tax rates. Last year's tax rate is the actual rate the taxing unit used to determine property taxes last year. This year's effective tax rate would impose the same total taxes as last year if you compare properties taxed in both years. This year's rollback tax rate is the highest tax rate the taxing unit can set before taxpayers can start tax rollback procedures. In each case these rates are found by dividing the total amount of taxes by the tax base (the total value of taxable property)with adjustments as required by state law. The rates are given per$100 of property value. Last year's tax rate: Last year's operating taxes $3,839,021 Last year's debt taxes $2,709,879 Last year's total taxes $6,548,900 Last year's tax base $1,551,872,230 Last year's total tax rate $.42200/$100 This year's effective tax rate: Last year's adjusted taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property) $6,543,222 - This year's adjusted tax base (after subtracting value of new property) $1,695,147,735 = This year's effective tax rate $.38599/$100 This year's rollback tax rate: Last year's adjusted operating taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property and adjusting for transferred function) $3,835,786 s This year's adjusted tax base $1,695,147,735 = This year's effective operating rate $.22628/$100 x 1.08=this year's maximum operating rate $.24438/$100 + This years debt rate $.11437/$100 = This year's rollback rate $.35875/$100 SCHEDULE A: Unencumbered Fund Balances The following estimated balances will probably be left in the unit's property tax accounts at the end of the fiscal year. These balances are not encumbered by a corresponding debt obligation. Type of Property Tax Fund Balance General Fund $2,864,629 General Obligation Debt Service Fund $779,453 Water and Sewer Impact Fee Funds $3,216,000 C SCHEDULE B: 1998 Debt Service The unit plans to pay the following amounts for long-term debts that are secured by property taxes. These amounts will be paid from property tax revenues. Principal or Contract Payment Interest to be Paid from to be Paid from Total Description of Debt Property Taxes Property Taxes Payment 1990 Series G.O. Refunding Bonds $104,532 $85,468 $190,000 1990 Series Tax/WW and Sewer System Revenue Certificates 40,000 9,707 49,707 1992 Series Tax/WW and Sewer System Revenue Certificates 50,000 68,975 118,975 1992 Series General Obligation Bonds 55,000 76,727 131,727 1993 Series Public Property Finance Contract Obligations 150,000 5,475 155,475 1993 General Obligation Refunding and Improvement Bonds 190,000 257,035 447,035 1996 Series Certificates of Obligation 0 15,950 15,950 1996 Series Tax/WW and Sewer System Revenue Certificates 120,000 111,245 231,245 1997 Series Certificates of Obligation 310,000 480,084 790,084 1998 Series Certificates of Obligation 325.000 906.328 1.231.328 $1,344,532 $2,016,994 $3,361,526 Total required for 1998 debt service $3,361,526 - Amount(if any)paid from funds listed in Schedule A $1,028,546 - Excess collections last year $0 - State aid for facilities = Total to be paid from taxes in 1998 $2,332,980 + Amount added in anticipation that the City will collect only 100%of its taxes in 1998 $0 = Total Debt Levy $2,332,980 This notice contains a summary of actual effective and rollback tax rates'calculations. You can inspect a copy of the full calculations at the Southlake Administrative Offices, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake,Texas 76092. Name of person preparing this notice Lou Ann Heath Title Director of Finance, City of Southlake { Date Prepared August 13. 1998 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 10, 1998 To: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager From: Billy Campbell,Director of Public Safety Subject: Fire Accreditation The Fire Services Division is embarking on an exciting project this week with the arrival of the fire accreditation team. The team is assembled of fire chiefs from Alabama, Illinois, and Michigan. Their objective is to evaluate whether or not our agency can be accredited(conducts operations in compliance with national standards). The accreditors will assess and answer four basic questions: • Are the goals, objectives and mission of the organization being achieved? • Is the organization effective? • What methods are used to achieve accreditation standards? • What are the reasons for the success of the organization? To answer these questions the assessors will look at criteria divided into ten(10) categories. These are: • Governance and Administration(organization chart) • Assessment and Planning(community split into geographic zones) • Goal and Objectives(management process used to implement goals and objectives) • Financial Resources(financial planning addresses strategic or master plan) • Programs(public education programs are targeted toward specific audiences) • Physical Resources(apparatus maintenance program established) • Human Resources(agency policy prohibiting sexual, racial, disability etc., harassment) • Training and Competency(Process in place to identify training needs) • Essential Resources(adequate supervision and management of communications center) • External System Relationships(mutual aid agreements are identified and current) • Planning for future service delivery; water capacity, response,buildings& equipment location and replacement. We are excited to have the opportunity to be the first fire agency in Texas to undergo review for accreditation and are confident that this goal of achieving accreditation will be achieved. Once we are accredited, we can expect the following benefits: City of Southlake,Texas Shane Yelverton C Fire Accreditation August 10, 1998 Page 2 • Quality Improvement through a continuous self-assessment process. • Assurance to peers and the public that the organization and City has defined missions and objectives and strives to meet or exceed them. • Results in growth for the Department and its personnel. • Offers National recognition for the Department and City by peers and the public. • Fosters pride in the organization from department members, community leaders,and citizens. If you have any questions about this process, please call Deputy Director Wilson or me. 66t BC/bc C City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 To: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Mamager From: Garland Wilson, Deputy Director,Fire Service Subject: Accreditation Summary The Commission on Fire Accreditation International has completed their review of Fire Services. They were extremely complementary on personnel and the internal structure of our organization. They will rate us on numerous categories and return a final report in a month. We will submit a detailed written report and review of their findings. Gw/gw L L SURVEY OF TENNIS CENTER/TENNIS PRO Arlington Tennis Center 557-5683 Tennis Pro: City Employee Package: Receives no benefits or percentage, they are paid a straight salary. Pro Shop: City runs pro shop with all proceeds going directly to the City. Hiring Procedure: Advertised in paper and with USPTA. They chose three finalist and then asked the tennis association to come and evaluate each pro. The pro would come out and do a lesson plan for a group and the association would then give feedback to the director on whose style and techniques they liked most. NRH Tennis Center 514-9903 Tennis Pro: City Employee Package: Receives full benefits. They also employ 21 part-timers but they receive no benefits. Pro Shop: City runs pro shop with all proceeds going directly to the City. Hiring Procedure: Placed ads in USPTA job bulletin,NRPA magazine, all local papers. Bedford Tennis Center 952-2170 Tennis Pro: Contractor Package: Pro receives a 75/25 split with City on all lessons and clinics. City does all marketing for tennis center. Receives no benefit package. Pro Shop: Pro supplies all inventory and 70/30 split on all proceeds. Hiring Procedure: They did no formal advertising since they knew the person and hired once the center was completed. Plano Tennis Center 972-461-7170 Tennis Pro: City Employee--they are currently trying to switch to a contractor Package: Full benefits. They prefer contracting a pro over hiring an employee. A contractor receives a 65/35 split so City doesn't have to worry about overtime. Many employees lack the drive to get the center in full swing since they do not receive any extra compensation. Pro-Shop: Currently City runs the Pro Shop but they have experienced serious inventory problems. They prefer the pro to run and stock pro shop and the City would receive a percentage of proceeds. f ` Trophy Club Tennis Center 491-9586 Tennis Pro: Contractor Package: 65/35 split with City. Pro is responsible for all hiring and payment to all assistants. Pro does all marketing for programs. Pro Shop: Pro owns tennis shop and provides all inventory with a 90/10 split with club for all proceeds. Procedure: Advertised only in the local papers. C C City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 11, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Public Safety SUBJECT: Bomb Threat Investigated At 8:26 am on August 11, 1998, communications personnel received a call from Roy Sills, financial secretary of the Transport Workers Union. Sills stated that in reviewing answering machine tapes from the previous day he listened to the third message recorded the evening before. The caller appeared to be male and whispered, "Three explosive devices are in place, one at the local 513 union hall, one at west support and one at Gate 44. They are set to detonate at noontime on Tuesday." Upon relating these details to communications personnel, Sills was informed to immediately leave the building along with the other employees. DPS fire and police personnel were dispatched to the scene to investigate. An integrated command was established and shortly afterwards a first sweep of the building was conducted. One briefcase of unknown ownership was located inside the offices and not disturbed. A second briefcase was located on the parking lot. It could not be determined if the briefcase on the parking lot had been abandoned by persons leaving the premises or there prior to officers arrival. As a precaution, the Northeast Explosives Response team(NERT)was contacted to come and examine the briefcases. Prior to NERT's arrival the office briefcase was positively identified and claimed by its owner. The second briefcase was transported robotically to a safer location on the parking lot and then examined via remote control. This briefcase proved to be one left by a earlier occupant of the building. During the entire operation, traffic was diverted from Kimball to Highland for safety. DFW police were contacted since the threat purportedly involved DFW properties as well as liaison with the FBI established. Based on the time frame given by the caller and as an added precaution, the union hall remained unoccupied until 1:00 PM. Traffic was also diverted around the Union Hall again from approximately 11:45 AM until 12:30 PM. The case is under investigation at this time. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. BC/gg City of Southlake,Texas Office of Economic Development Monthly Fact Column Volume 6, July 1998 1. What is the City of Southlake's property tax rate? For Fiscal Year 1998 (FY98), the City of Southlake property tax rate is $0.422 per assessed value. This means, for a home valued, or assessed, at $300,000, the applicable property tax is $1,266. Tarrant (County) Appraisal District is responsible for appraisal of all properties within Tarrant County; and their appraisals are based upon 100% of market value as of January 1 of each year. The City of Southlake contracts with Tarrant County for the collection of property tax. 2. How has the City of Southlake's property tax rate changed in the past 5 years? With the establishment of a tax rate of$0.422 per $100 assessed value, the FY98 city tax rate has not increased for the seventh consecutive year. For fiscal years 1996, 1997, and 1998, the rate has remained $0.422. For fiscal year 1995, the rate was $0.449; and for fiscal years 1994 and 1993, the rate was $0.455. City Property Tax Rate Per$100 Assessed Value FY1989-FY1998 so.6 1 ::: s0.o Does not include I SD or County J ursd is Lions Source:City ofSouthlake Finance Depanment • Cie . • It w L3. What is the City of Southlake's property value growth rate? Based on values between fiscal year 1993 and 1998, the city's total taxable value has increased from $610.5 million to $1.55 billion. This equates to an average annual growth rate of 20.5 percent. As a general rule of thumb, the property within a city that is taxable includes single family, vacant lots and tracts, commercial, industrial, ranch, farm, and acreage real property, and commercial and industrial personal property. 4. What is the difference between personal property and real property? Real property, often referred to as real estate or realty, is physical property including land and everything attached to the land. With real property, there are two classes: land, and improvements. Personal property is all movable property and is not permanently affixed to the property. Examples of personal property include machinery, equipment, and inventory. Source: Jesse Howard, Tarrant Appraisal District L ` 'A NEWS CLIPPING j Source: The Business Press DATE: August 7-13. 1998 I ? for Southlake 0 OOOsf spec office project slated By KELL! ROOOA for each building to be two stories at 2 3.000 became available. I saw an c pportunity to THE BUSINESS PRESS square feet. fill a need." Ford's site plan is going through the This is one of the largest office projects SOUTHLAKE — David Ford. a custom city's approval process, he said. planned for Southlake, said Kate Barlow. homebuilder, plans to develop a three- The concept plan was approved,and the economic development specialist for the building office complex totaling some property was rezoned from agriculture. city of Southlake. 70.000 square feet off Southlake Boulevard Ford decided to create the project be- "Based on the requests I've received in between White Chapel Boulevard and cause he needed some office space for his this office, there is a fairly strong demand Byron Nelson Parkway. own company,Best Tex Custom Homes. for office space,"Barlow said."Office space The French Square Office Complex is a "Almost all the office space in Southlake that has come up fills up quickly." speculative project on 6 acres. Plans call is leased," Ford said. "So when this land see SOUTHLAKE on page 35 SOUTHLAKE from page 1 "In the past,buildings have opened fully leased,which is a sign of a strong market," she added. Andres and Associates Architects of Dallas designed French Square. Designs call for a French motif with a brick fa- cade with a mansard-style roof,Ford said. Ford is the general contractor for the space. * L NEWS CLIPPING Source: Fort Worth Star-Telegram DATE: August 5, 1998 • As, y ^ y = t. i. a ._' Q V E v t) = — y..g -c .E _ � .-. r y y 11 3) G C , .�. 0 y u :A :U y .--• L L c of Le Ii/ y o +_ tz 3 Z r 3 ;) 4 r. n •.C"., %' i .k C .� -v G Q ^ y. K •.yC14 va 50 pE iiimi y C v �^y' L n V 'Q tt". ~ ., ^3 ' � '� a y .r"3 U '0 C g F , Q. C .`0, p 0 y ca y 'y p f e C lam• 4 •[ p Q G p U :C >.J� •� fa.y N E VI 'A CA M insa 5.� c g o e� C - '�g G. � U o �' ay .. UC .: oo ;3 � ;� o.�E... • 55 T ° E k y '1' >4 li u �+ , C•o 3 7 2 a y E- co U c :� PI O a0 ' _ of v v y o y 874 = a ,., _1 v 3 Q) U �' t 1.0M. ... 0 y r. U O C . C C O X a) C ,.. 0 m I J c1 k c > Z F. pap- p v .. .yw. '� -• v S ^v .• 'S y 3 ."' 7A� 7 CS C G•L-, G Or. C > O."' O C 70 O y y O u c- C y O C EC r. - p p E0„ = , U E- Oa U :7Ogc-fl 0Ea) � Up v ... ;I? ,-• u2Evc eaC..ocv' egg oa �; m ¢ -5 .5E-•° cU •'• $:5 O T� ��, v - sou 3 - - 000 o �'. ao c.= 0 Uc.a > O r c. c � b•5. ~a ' .,'I - c v• c -03 o -c y v.0 .r C c 0 w v x t..2. 3 5 ocn ?,� ..,4 rn G o � ¢ ° E o cam ° • I - t � c l • = E = .e0= s >, af � 14 = E� O 4 4• y• C ^, P.Oc ` ▪▪ 0... 3 •3 cel t ° = u'° " E v r 0 . oI-. o U o - . ' >, l J cis. Cl) � E.. sE- d .. = U ^• � .0 3 o- =-o =1 � s a i �U c ^ 5 ..._= .0 c •:A N > -• ti ay) ' o a y 3 _ a v • h UU (11- 0 ,g .g 0 0 L„, ''s •..."" --ea 1 1 ...%4 C..) ••••• •••• CS C.) ,.= c318. U c v vp AMCAvU C aw3iii -ui c � > r 3 a� vncsa, v_0 cCs . - 3 :3 ° c. a"i � � o � � e�� � o3 �'y � . V ;: O '7 j •C ??- -5 z ri' C 7 .O y . G - E" = - ,"- 0 5 3 ,C 0 N 43 C- to 5 >,^ -p o .. o -O p v U n L C :-. 5 �p" j .: :A yO ^ a) C p ^ ••• ' 2 OE. c r o. c U a .c^ '^ o EW y �v. � 3cys � >_ C. y r. :A „ � -o c 3 =0 ° � � " _ � v � -pyy. y c E > -• ccc c � E � � 30 > y .fl u .Cj .E ›., c � y c1 y . . = w0ci'. y -0 y u ._ " � C �' „:ore, .c a)-_y: CA > C E 1 < A y C c% = ` -- E m o y '2 J : p L O :-. O ,, p U ..• O J Z • 5- 2 .c . .� 3 3 E y E � 3z 3 Lrs» r 1.... c �'v OO v V:e p ) 0a•_ 5 >,ue 3 � y =n E - p ,. riu Z 0 c � � U .li p � A c ' y o �� a. u�oo .r , 0p tOO JnU3 = S. 3a' `tocAo 5. ma ,. c -sa ;,, Ua n _c> is c j o z I .J o :3 i�, cyr ... r•• 1? = V • •3 .O^ C 3 - .� L„ C y U y L i y o " �A p .+ V] C a+ v _, �'on y zL. a^ y o � v' C G 3 1-. 8j - � z y� c c � y `� D "0 F r"1 f •• 3 C rr C •� C O 'C,C C v s •� > :.) O S4 ... O },. �+'' -p a U p .-. 5 U Off, •aU v' " E O C nO 8 C 4J C� p .y.. -C t..• OU w - O p .w ,r Q C C ;n y .. O o _. M.O 0 Gil v, E-. c ° -0Q\ i a= c >, yr y )) -1 otopa 3 , s a es y v �s � v � b u �s 3 .. E- a, c > 0 .5 a) c UV u •74 Qr, cn3U4v .E= � E ,; �' 3Lv: a � = sn. � Uva - w L" v' :ct . 0 .sz U r C a) cs O `. C.5 City of Southlake Chamber of Commerce Report a Date: August 13, 1998 Presented To: Chamber of Commerce Board Prepared By: Economic Development Staff- Greg Last, Kate Barlow Following are selected items of interest related to economic development in the City of Southlake. RECENT DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS • July 21, 1998: Council approved the site plan for Southlake Crossing Animal Clinic at the north side of West Southlake Boulevard approximately 350' west of Randol Mill Avenue. • July 21. 1998: Council approved the Residential Adjacency Standards and Corridor Overlay Zone Revisions. The new residential adjacency standards apply for non-single family residential buildings/uses developing within 400' of a single family residential property line or area designated low or medium density on the current land use plan. • July 21. 1998: Council approved the rezoning and concept plan for The Trailhead at the north side of Johnson Road approximately 180' east of Warrington Lane. The Trailhead consists of 19 acres and will feature 27 residential lots and one common area. • July 21, 1998: Council approved the site plan for Solana Park Circle at the north side of Kirkwood Boulevard. south and west of S.H. 114, and east of Precinct Line Road. This project includes two five story buildings and one four story building (for a total of 514,338 square feet). and a four level parking garage. • July 21. 1998: Council approved the specific use permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption at Me-N-Ed's Pizza within Village Center. DEVELOPMENT UPDATES • Southlake Town Square: The developer has recently provided the following additions to their tenant list: Ann Taylor (women's clothing): Banana Republic (men's and women's clothing): Churchill's (fireside and patio); Gymboree; Kids Foot Locker; Lady Foot Locker; Magic Moon (children's furniture); Rockfish (seafood restaurant); and Sprint PCS. • Southlake Oaks Shopping Center Phase I: This center is now fully leased. The final two tenants are Blimpie Sub and Sandwich Shop and a Grapevine-based oriental restaurant, likely featuring Chinese cuisine or sushi. Chamber of Commerce Report August 12, 1998 Page 1 i • The Village at Timarron Phase II: Construction is planned to start this month. Tenants include Lady of America (health and fitness facility); The Mother's Place (products and services for expectant mothers, nursing mothers and infants); Mary Haltom Jewelers (fme jewelry); and Everyware (distinctive and unique home accessory items). REGULATORY ISSUES • Impervious Coverage Ordinance: We anticipate that members of the workgroup held their final meeting last night, Wednesday, August 12. This ordinance (No. 480-BB) has been tabled until the September 3, 1998, P&Z meeting. Staff Contact: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743. • Sexually Oriented Business (SOB) Ordinance: Staff is continuing to work on the required study which precedes the adoption of a new SOB ordinance. The moratorium currently in place will be extended for another 180 days, ending on January 31, 1999. Staff contact: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743. • Outside Storage and Outdoor Display Work Group: This newly formed work group will address the amount of outdoor storage/display permitted, the appropriate location of such, and the preferred methods of screening. This work group will include corporate retailers, elected and appointed officials, and staff. Their first meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 13. 1998, at the Administrative Conference Room, Administrative Offices, 1725 East Southlake Boulevard. Staff contact: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, et. 743. • Sign Ordinance Update: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the draft Sign Ordinance during the Public Hearing held Thursday, August 6, 1998. The ordinance, incorporating the Commission's recommendations, is scheduled for First Reading at City Council on Tuesday, August 18, 1998. Staff contact: Stefanie Sarakaitis, Comprehensive Planner, 481-5581, ext. 753. • Outdoor Water Conservation Measures: Residents and businesses are asked to continue observing the following mandatory measures. Odd number addresses water ONLY on Wednesday, Friday and Sunday. Even numbered addresses water ONLY on Tuesday, Thursday. and Saturday. All outdoor watering may ONLY be done between 4:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.. and 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. No outdoor watering on Mondays. This schedule does not apply to those with private water wells. STAFF PROJECT UPDATES Aerial Maps: Community Development staff worked with American Aerial Photo to have current aerials of the city produced. A complimentary copy is attached for each Chamber Board member. Additional copies can be purchased for $15 at the Community Development Dept. at City Hall. INTERESTING DATA • Residential Permits: 63 issued in July, Average Permit Value for 1998 is $264,300. Second highest July of all time; in July 1996, 64 permits were issued. Chamber of Commerce Report August 12, 1998 Page 2 pir • Commercial Permits: 5 permits issued in July including 5,926 SF at 751 E. Southlake Blvd. (6, (Creekside Office); 3,200 SF at 1600 W. Southlake Blvd for Tetco Convenience Store; 873 SF at 1600 W. Southlake Blvd. for Tetco Car Wash; 6,000 SF at 1608 Hart Street; and 15,500 SF at 2615 E. Southlake Blvd. (Georgetown Park) • General Fund Sales Tax Revenues: June 1998 collections totaled $200,233; Fiscal Year to date up 35.2%. • Monthly Fact Column: Attached is the July 1998 Office of Economic Development Monthly Fact Column distributed to area media. • Stormwater Drainage Utility System: The city has entered into a professional services agreement with a consultant for the development of a city-wide Stormwater Drainage Utility System. Updates will be provided as progress is made. FUTURE EVENTS • NTCAR Expo: Economic Development staff will participate in the North Texas Commercial Association of Realtors Expo scheduled for Monday, August 31, from 4 to 8 p.m. • Groundbreaking Ceremony: Bicentennial Park Expansion Phase II groundbreaking will be held Friday, August 21, 9:00 a.m. at Bicentennial Park parking lot. Phase II will consist of 13 lighted tennis courts, pro shop, in-line hockey court, and 3 basketball courts. • City Budget Work Sessions: FY99 City Budget work sessions, open to the public, will be held Wednesday, August 19, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and if needed, Thursday, August 20, from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. For further information contact: Community Development Department Phone: (817) 481-5581 / Fax: (817) 488-9370 Greg Last, Community Development Director, ext. 744 Kate Barlow, Economic Development Specialist, ext. 776 Attachments: • July 1998 OED Monthly Fact Column • Southlake aerial map (complimentary copy for each board member) • Economic Development Implementation Programs Copies To: City Council Planning and Zoning Commission Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Cri Chamber of Commerce Report August 12, 1998 Page 3 til (D a r go go if 0 0 0 'Fiii oN c w o� 0 �. - _.. .... _� o - 9 (� M O 2 G CD E cp n 4 b nvro c' � " � b tow02 6 cnW . o 5 CD 0 cm,.. 0 :lig a . PoaQ . . Aoo n 00 a O CD cs ct o G = i G M. AD '5A A CD 4 - �r /y�.� CCC ON ^ V _O Vy 5' � 8§ � 0 0 0 ° 0 � 08 , crci �-u ( < =- � - o � n �• 8 c5 _ g g10 1 0D a La • nZ ton'o 5 <A u, 06D t r o 9 _ n aegco a °� o, N 0 w no c oo ►�g , o o .� 'd 5. N'd OQ h b7 S t 3 OQCD o " o w v 0 o'o' n 5 c o d Co Go �; �� $ �e ,� 6' 0o 'CI CV g 0 CDc cn m n c 'O V. OQ b' o oQ ►... O0 — a ►C I v) ELe. cA b o0 do Le) N c ►�� Y S 00 14. �l { i � �, � 3 d �S ��d' - 6'1y `T 7 •4711\ 1_ d . S de_ ;, 1/ 4,21 t141q- .3i ;)11:4141 - 4W, .• t A • -,\ _� r . `CAMA SUMMER OARS /t0,,e_etA.... ,6.--A-A---:,--' 4/e-A7-7•)"4-4--- 1.. C . g--)4-eleue_et— a.. Z..-. efrieLeti...., . .. a -----747, CLa--' / '4L„61, yez,< -27,-& .= 04z-e-c/ i_kr...., fr....,,,t,, , 1,-.4..e_A__ ete.....7.,(...-„,c64 _, cc---,-7W._ '6--Az,zz/--xi:T--r:, 3,0._(...4,1_,,660106(., ,.:, ,,tf.,,... ..,,,,,,,,', -- -eti,:es.)''.-‘ i....-.,-.--.-, -,-,-..-V, i, p ,.„,„4 . .:i r...: l _., .t s..F:,�- l }., '�i �. r' � 7;Y:.:..� �i[ p '"& t , - 1 p 3; x . : •.'., ..5h ` 'fi4n"r' t.R1 T$'� ,rx a? 4 r`''?'re+ni L• wr t. n .p _ x'.1''e',1't'i''.1' �i ,," '[fit.: Y n,ta 4�+ 'L .?y i si M1S", ` 1 .t' s ja M.,. ,'.; E. '.*4J.J'4a 8417 £ ^.ems.` gAN ilN t1F,n '^� yd� k: 1' ., h { S.YI .. k71si r` - • • a, '�_ C . 1412 Whispering Dell Ct. • Southlake, Texas 76092 • (817) 481-2466 • Fax (817) 329-6181 --...........,,*'..,, . -.. .. ....1 • •''A''•-,•-\ I il Q ..,-.- - . _ .:tirLS • ii, Lc) • e•_„„ 7.._ cc . • ...r• j. . -..-.) L... 1/4j .. ..r.) Q (1)•- --t, ,--. ,... 4 . --. --, /- . E • ( t) __z. c,„ .......; ., ,,; ,,.. , 0 h 1.) B... ' a (j) (.. --. ""••• . ft,A, ec .i .. . lv••., - • I--4 4....--*-- 4,,, .1 • 0 >% ::::77) .. s'"' 6 — .•.. ca, -z) cli $li -...... c.x.) ‘,....- c4) E 4) • c — — -I- c5 • ... ....,_c .....0 'L.: : < 4) t.5. G --4- isic , L._ --I- . '. Q) 1/4....., : 0 /--- (-I- 1- 1 • '0 • •••••• -- , I c‘,./ ci) .t. :',,: r• • c:i.,14,-.:`,.1'..'',,,,.-_, . p• ... ... .. , , .1,,, ,. . •• ,,'1..•':. . ' .1.• %'I.' ..'s' !.1 ! .-:.,';',,: ''.S..::,1,!','''''.:.'•..r.':::11:1,Vprr.:Y:.'{ iitf..: :, 1 j::, . .• ::' . •. ,.!:.::i'tv''' '"1-.-t'',i'i.:::-...:': "..;:':gtifW444(.1!".•::410; ' .tr: '.1.. .4,I-: - - rVIU -40- . it IIIIMIII. '-1•1' ••'-.-- ''''''- '•-..4 --•;- ,:l!.:. -7 -/I'• .4",.".....'.-. . ..•• ..g. ''../ ' . . .,..... '-' , /X : %:::,,-. ),,4, ...."'"... , 6 ... „,..:,.. cl (1\0 -- •- -........,.4... , . C ce'• / : .1--_-. :._ u ... . ,... , ..- ........ d ..., _ .., ..-...... ' . ,-.......L. ,e-S-)k...)C/ (-14. Lei (A ..1:f >•,- 0 di.c 1„.,;,' ........-• E.,/ CY .---- .6 ‘....- ..i?rn... 6 -7-c--• 0, .- .. .-...:.. ...---"a'r".- , • ..•••••••.....01. .. .,,,,-. ...6,_, ..•.- -:,,, 0/..,. ..___ , oi _ ,,... , . ,___._.:.,• ,,... s d -,7•in. U 7 "..'"... . — IP.'',, S. N E cs_ v . • Q „•__,.. ,,_,,, ...,4,..,„ ....c . ‘‘ •.!)., . . ... (-----,„ . .c-,.< nj4)-•• 6 . cl in u c17 . • _ . .: -..- - Xj . 1 IC -op • 0) °1 -o)11) ';- --0 tO •cl , x 4 I., ' .-' .. 10. • U E HjEot, • ::„,;„. 1•.' -ii\.•,',.. . -6 1-.1./ + . , -7, . . 14; .. ...'. .. :.4)...:4014:••, ;! .$4t,bs: 8.: ffi: i••••:,, ..„ . P.,.. ,'..;ii;.'',..itti:t:;•••-••,;::.•••,;.•... .. • • „ , ... . . l• . '[..-4 ,:itiNci:•••i::i,::',..iligiii..i:i:h:....,ii..;,3i .•, '::',.:.i . . • , • ,,,,I.. ,11.4lifiitilwild:.!.,,t, ;::„.:i:i: 17.4411t5 . '11 t;••• t'.,t:::::::.::•::-''. '../....,: •4,4;4( .1•:;,:.> t;.;1,:iiki:;;;::::::,'7;';',:: • . ..' 'it •tt ,1,.+,, -t;"'(••;i11 t*•:, 1,,4, ..,1., . *if.", % .14w- ,•:4' 'iz i:g 2ii it-',111:•1 J! .1, .,,t• 1.; . . 4. • ..1, . r; • •••••-• ,tt“ ....: ,•-}' ;• .' •.It ; ..; II,:•,..i,•1•:.:1;, ...'••'-' !;11;;1,1:1;!t;.. :•:/4,:..t;,-...iftii: •••',:1 - ;.•1,t,,,•,,,....4.....;.::: •--.... !1"-'';'-'''...:,•.•-'..'' .•...• ii;4:• -i;.. ,1,4$:::;$4;:••.::,:t .. ,,...., .. t.:.t.:,•,.,:::..,..t, •,‘,..4..-....,,st*;: .....'.t••!.;:..,t,,t.. ::;, ' ''..,- . .:.•:;..,:,..t...,..,..,....4-,.,,,,,,w,ttt;••.- =4 i''":".- ',. ". -•;; 1.•••t•,•:,,t4tr;•.i-‘,0:•:).•,,,ip.1•?,-„ ,, r"; •.,‘,:.,;:;:t.p.ilhl,..t.,...•;t4, ±P' 1• . • -.1;i,.1•;•,z,•$.4.tilt-lj•;N;4, Is, :it O'4 ,•.,..1::,:;.:; , ' , • ''',':11;:',I....Of:14 ;ip,''SI.O! '44•Z i .ti,:%*.- • ,',- „ ' 5`4 ;44,* ,i 1 41'1. •• '• , ' ';',' ',H. 1' ifY:ji• iVi 1 1.„; „,.. ., ,-);If• 1;$ :•t •,,litst t";;• '1 I itli ; ;:.;C,..._ •:‘,.: : , ., . '' ,..' :, $ti,,t•'‘`'i...141'.t2„t tt,, . f.te,:0-i",...:•:.•;;;.;,„ , ., , •r; 1 i 11 If!.ti:4 ;.,!.i ' N'it,'::•t,t;iti . . •,, ,,. zi :. 11 •''..: ,t,!t:,•:...';;%.:-..:Ji.,',. , •4 _41:1 i-S,4,•-;' . , • . . , . . • ! ;;*1 .1' ,..t.tti „titt$ Ifs -;;?;.•,•..; .i. 4 t•11,.t—o 0,;I:, .• , .„ ,16,,,, •• •;;T,1••;y•;i„•!'sfs 0}11..te, - '-• - . .,.1;iil .4;3.:,:!., ..rYflt,'!.:;:!:::•:..t . ••:.• _ is,..: •,::;111- 11:q.. z:•.: t•-•••,-•:•:•.:::• ti.:.-.' . ,.. ,9,1,S: j 0,;:!!:!$'.ii,::::,,,.,:f.',:::;;;:;•, .e•':;, - - : t.., ' 0i3''' • '.:':';.•;•:%•...1;3V.:l's:;! fl.; '''.- • . • It01;3 I %-,,•'•. .- .rs"- .,. .1,1t' ,..,. .... -s-.. . • ., .... ,,t;:.r......e.; •• '•••s,4 .. -•'':r,;i•i:,c.t4j,.. .•„,,t„,... „,, -., • . ,- • ' ---,i,04'.,•,-.4,-.1,t 1,-01,•';:::::•stt:x 4 -tti.:4: ,.'•1•-ttl:::!:0.:t,t,..t.i.r,:.•::.;.:Is.„;I:.4.11.; : `J ' 3,tt,..;:-'tv..:;:. -••„:t. 0 4- • , .. . .•:..,,Ii:1:i4/11 .1..; ,,:, -4 A . ... • , ., ........ . , . . -.•;:.!•••,:::::;;;::tiliiiT i'l:ttti:;:t* *.: :';....•••,:,:.:,./, I ti; • .. , ..T. fil •-' ,'•,-;•••:*':;•••,, .; • .‘,"!.......,., , .•,$ ‘ ..„,„„..,.. ..,, ....., ,,,,,,,„„,,,„,,„„;•,,„„ . . ,;,,, ,..........,...,, . ,... . , • •4 ., , , .1,, .„. , ,..•1,.1,.,,,,.4,1 ,,,•J.,i;;;;;,•,:::t:i.,' ,,,,,i , kitign4-7.0. i ;;'.1! • :'',It DI, .,-%;-:•:11';';';';iii::;•;;;;;;; ''').*'' Ot 4i 14... ,74117,1 ';Ctiqt'll;'•:•:•: • 'VI I 4i3.1.Mit'5*i:141'A;;:iP .',I:W Ifli:if:;':: '•.`:: ':, • . , . ,., ' -'. ' Arrft l'-';.•?• : iit iT*Iti;,..40-ig,:•ti;t:tt.t: ,,,,i ...,..,..,4!....„•,.....,,,., ,...,.. , ;,;.1.,•:-.... . '. • .. ,.. . s, kz, „•;,:..-„--va.:;;;,t es;;:•;,:',.f"..",f " , -.,••:•-'....‘•;,-;;;,... ':-., . 1 ,., .,--•,:•=, i . .4 . - . , • • . . -- ... ....,.......,_ .- . 1 -- •. . ._. - . .„. . .. ;‘..... . , . . - - • / . •i. ‘, . . ... . _ ,. _ , . .• . . . .. . - • .'-'...,.• Oli;;%tW:.S.01 :'::1•,:t -'M 3.0 .le.7!elt`'' ;'''''''Ylifr.i,N:ii• '''' ''''-' - ' '11',.; `.1; t, .:•;:'.; •P.: ••..,.,'. %' . ' .•. . .:;,'••IN pi.I •;• •:.!.,;•;Iti.-1S• '';',1.;SIIr.e.::::';:!-,:'.i;,. t. . 1...`....:.:', ' -• = ,+ • . '''''''lliliqi:•" ''':::';V:1.1:4.;''''.",11I' .:,..,..te,...1,1;;Ii*P., 4 , • 3;' , 4-'' . • • •4 • ., - yt •i•p• •.-4;•>$3;c,4w.;::..•:-...);,,tt•- •::, ••f•-• - 0 •, ••••'.';t:11.:-..,m...,T3•'•.;,• .. 't'q• }, g . , .:.. i'740,-,', - - . , ';i htt rlyi.1.4;,i6,..:pr.„..;,,..;.,:,.,,:,::.!:•Ii.....!.,,c....:....,,:;. ,'''.:", ', g;;;f44,.,-... ,. l'...,;.2iil-f- 1-• .. - - ,,,,.+„Otw.,.. . , ' •0 _ . , 411 . 1- ' • YI,Q( 1 ti ;. ..:-.-• ::. -4 • ... 4.--,, :// . --c ,,q,. „Ii,,::...,;,‹:i-,:•,..:•-..• ...*..,,,, .,„,; _,.„.„„:„. „::,.,;„ ., f.: • • • •:, . • . • ; -..„...„,„,„„:•.• :::,•,,•:::.....: .:.....,. 1.,,,,,,-•• ,.., .., ., _. ., 1-i,e,fri,„-„•-•,.,,;i••••.,:••,••;....,:s.. 1,..,...i , .,...::„.....„:„.. :••:•....„ _ . 1, .,,,,,,., ...,,,,, -•: . ,.,...2.• „ ....._!' . , • :-,,, i 6 i•.:1 . . ,.,,, -..„4„,• •,;,,-. , -.---,,,, :ft =, ‘i;c..:::,•;i„•;••:.,•-;:::,...6..-• .1,, ,,,;!;ii,-,,,-,:ilti•:-,..-•,.,..,? -.-, —Px)) 1,f011 •-•,..ttt. t„., - * alAeiw . ,,,-;!. itiedo,,•;*:iil.., -• . ....4,,,,_ ,•-..• • A.. ,AT ..,,,,..•1:6.4,. ,...-...,:.. ..,-.;,„,:: . ‘ 12,*,;04v...: .. 9L1.%1§11;, •'*it..i, :i>,..-.c';::'' -c-, _ ,:-,,,,,vovii -, ,0 „..,,, ,,,,,--_,.. . , ,. • -, , - .,--, 01,4.I • .,t,i' ••;..(YV•• ',III:qf'.ifti.,- ; :-i:gt.z...,. <,-..,..F.L-,1.,i-F...-g-,-:-.,.....',- ;/- ::, :,,.-,,-,--'''''-- -''-'----','':1"'-'77-- •••Orm-'4%-' ';•'.••r„ „4„...,,,,,:r_..,4"-77•••''''",-..--',---,;:;• -::".';.•--'.,'"'t*;;ttli !*;i ‘87;n0,.:;•::.:M:',:, .'I'. olti4i4V;Ir ': :144"445424'Y4'.‘'...t1k, " ,4,---.--', - -:--j'-- - ', - :. .'.-"-r.':.1.-,,,!-4.:". .,..,, • --iiii.1"-,,-"......- ': , •,-:...-,,.:,--;,',. '-. -.' .-.1-,,,,,,-;,.. -, :s,!: jr::}1*iis 14*iz..-...:,:,:•::.',ii..,. : -:.!L, ....L.:A,i.,e- et,„'"1.„4..„fo,-&-:=,-ztkni.0. .,,,,„.444:•4.-;:-_---' .. :„;•'•-...;;N•::-Ye• ••;,:•,, -;•,L5,4-.•;t'lt.;.•,-;„.„ -;....•-• , ,-t.:•,:r.,•,;,: •,--••.•: • ;-„,. ...,..;:;,,,,..,„..-...:?„1..40.4 ,;t•i!i:i.:ti, lt,f*•.;,;;.??.;-:.i:itt5fiz•tit •.„1.4441(41,.2.-d.i..-:, .:•:• ::k.A.i;•;,:o!,•,11•',..;•,;:.,...- ••.-..-.,,,i•A.,q,•-e...s.,;•.•;-;, •-.... ,. •.•.•-, :,•-•3•;•,••:f...•:-.p.,,.,.-..1.0....3t-e,‘,..,.,-„,i.,;‘,N.k t.t.,•:;•,'.-•';,.';-,S • :•. ...- .• ..... .•:„.„.....4;;Ig.i:fie,i• •:::::!„ ••,;:.;:•.,.•4„.;•:;;::::,:;;;i: ,:;••• z;•--- 0•ff- '-'•'t•f''fi, : 4;..e.!..,' `'‘, ,,,,,71,6?;P.i,'..,.',..; ' ' . ' '' :-.' ,'''''''‘,,',1, 1%-^''‘'': -41:;'!i7:-- -•:' '''"c".'',• . ' ..: , ‘ ,.7,'. ;:...,;••••- ;th••: • 't:It rs.,•,:il.::1195:t::•tk:i;,• .....;;• • -- •••,•t- *.,,t,••••,„--.4•••'4-..,f••."',7,,•-,,,`'-4,,i;'...".',+..- , • , .,;:.'„,,,-..,7yr,?::*.1%. i,.';,,,... ,- ';'•*rf's'Z''.`',. ' - -. ''',''.74 ii ;!‘',;4'.t g$''';:g.:1•,;:::liqltqf: ' ; ',',..--''',',,f44 A•'1 ii .::".-,':, --':;,•,;:,-,v."--,-,''' • ' - ' ',.-'-;i4,i'; , .V:''...it,fk$i.::::.:;,:%!.::': z.: 1 .,'*---''Ll-)'' 4h1'7ii,YOFX1''';AA. .2b''',4 ;A;'....1/...f.!-C.' '' ' . . '.' '..-'. .`".-** • • •.'.'.•--,.--- .-..•,•'';'' '-i.‘ `',fi,,••-•,'..,,,,-.1.;!,.; , ., ..';'•••• 'E.4.-.z„0,ct5q•! ".:::•:,;;.•:••.;;•,',;:-.;::'.:: •;;;;,.11;.3';•:;$,•••;?2,:::.1.• •'''.'7'''''A;xtli•••-•••-• - 4,,•4:i&V,„,':,i• ,-• -• ".-- ; . .4;',.•,:4,z1•4:4.•:-.... 4,4:R4",:=:,- ----,,c,'-, 417'4*,..,...,.-.4,-,••?4,••i',••-•1•.4.1.0;,:;,.,-;4...••:;0;,;;;;',1$1,'•;•;:,,t;i:>,,,;',.-;:•;:-,••• •:,.:;:, •,1•,,,,i4,4;,;.,,z,.:4;;.,,,,.* ,-,;:,,...,,,,, (;-4,..,,i...;-.,1„,..:...•-;.,,,,T4,%,14 ?„.4,,-.--- - . -- !'-.•:4:-,,,,,'?!;,..r-',-,..e‘':•04.-iiike.,,4-,:i.it;4 f,'':,:.:,.'SI,r,:f.: "i;•-t..:;-..':-,:-..;:ti...;:-•:',.‘:.-:1,7 '.;-..•iiiiiplifnki!.i:1_,:ys,l';::::::it 1•..-M•.:;;;•:* .•`•••,•:-••'';;,•: =. ;F-44 .tillAreN:TtlY;;•!!,.f:k4.1 .,.-1;:;-:.;,. ....... .., .. „.. ,.„ , .,,....-:,,,.:.,:::-..,,,i,i.-.,..-.:-..--.....-:?----,---.-fta.:-.7.....:,.,_<...,,..,12:',.,-.4w. ., ,,,--,:,-...,„.4,.,.-, :t .!,,,-i•,y,.,:,"•,•.1:-:::.:---.1..::..,,;.',„' ,;;Jit'.',v4A,.,-;:- .-:- .:4.,..--•-i.i.:-,..,-,4;:a••,---.Q;-*:.trigl-,7•••.',p,-A.;-J';,.;-..,-,: -,..- -:,,, •-.- '-..fi:!!...z4_ ,,,:,. .": r, :•.-•''s-Igie-;•,4'•--1.4, ,!. ,, t.„ ,.1,,,.i,,,r., •,, .-,14?...?,,-.?...--r.:.1.•--4-n•- j,,,,,...-/"..ii,,,,-.;,:-. .-:,,, ,.. .,.,.;- ,-4.;..,,,Q.4..*.,4-, ,.,-,---:•, --,..::-..t,,...•=ft---,..;.;•.4':,.. ..0.:4=".V.;#1 ,•••}vf•`•,-;.:. 'Y,';'' :..„..,."."•:., .:...'.:..:. 4 „ 1i... :,. ..:. .... ,,,...:.„._. ,..,.. .,i.,,,I,!•,„..,,-:..-..;..„,:i!,t-- . 1.,,-.,,,,--,,...,,,,, - __r''''''ff''''''''''''''44'0 ).0:1.':Pc!• -• .A.A.:-. :'S..:'''',.. ;''''' .'" .(1, .'.;•10iiii:i:i. . ...'',..:'-... ; • t.. ,i , • . .414.FA' .;..'hil;s:,:f..,:..4.'1' . ..:, - '.,,,. .!7'... n;':,,;.;;::'',;.!..:;.':.'!:Y..;,,, * : itil:':;q'":.'i; ' r..ftZl'''fk'n7.:4!..-ry: Y. '4..,'...;'; '4'''." A..''' - :..i,:r.n*i, 6,,,,,.::„..,,,,....„...,,,,,,•,,,, . . '..:-.1,1•P',.' ,-.3,.•,-,af,-,::,•-.;:-:"(..„;;;',..;,:;•,..< ..:;;.Wi.-,;•,,,,;A :;•:•;--..,:iz0,($: ,14 L•4,;;;;:i;•,. .:... . 4'!,.;•.;7••;'"•!'••••••':-/',.'..7.4.-.• •-.•.!.,,,t...,:‘$•.;;.,•,.2.1:;',.,-...‘cit.,.“-.2-.•,•.. :.; ,.',1',c-v-irf/ .' ; r,t;':;'It.,-,,•-•.-;;.=:',„ti-.•-•':4;-,..-:,;:...:-;;;•-...,„' ,,,t,•-4,1,,,,,,:4•.!t--;,t,'„Ittpx,•--,*,• ••.,, ',.;;.•:;•,:;•;,;;‘••;,:•,•:11.,,-.. ;:-...., • 1.''',11 3{f?'',;-•.',M-',,,.„..• •";4,,,,,:-;•..ie,;, ...;;;.„!••.,,,,t,,,st.•,,,,,,,,,,-;; z..;.;I„,-..• • ., . ,, ••••.11,.. „„„i, ,,,,,.*;;.ss• .,,,,,;,c,-,,,,-..,• 4,,,,,,,61..,„t...„i„.:410,,,:q.,?,,.,„1.•:„...:::,,t„.,,..„'s?,•,:t,..5,;; •••.•„;-;; .,;•.;;•1 sicr.,,;:i;iii.td$:-,:, '•••!•:-%?::•2'.: ?;'!'''''';',;: ":171S'::.,;^?„„1,ViAlt4,„-V:If,ity„, .?Tr,"...,V.,.c,‘,V),';',". , , ..-- ••;I:,',,ct"`-.4.,•T4?; ,,,',.,;.. "0,.%r'41:11;t1,:',7.'4. '-'",,*i 4"t.i:4>-1',-i,'4'''.''-',-', '''','.ti rqie 4: :,11!1:',:,, i',','.:•. 7 vn;:-..,,",:.:.:,:f:.,,,,:?..ln:....iiti?,5.r, ,,,.44.44-.r.J.•.•n•••i•,•,'i;:•_:;!-.:•,,..,4,S;c•-;..r.:-.--.•••.-.- , *.,'..„-,-;!:•;.---.,i,.-.'--..,:it ...-.. .,4.,: -2-,...„, . ,_...;.:-xx,r, , ,,.....e, . ,, ::,,,,i„,„,,...,,,,,•,4-;-,-„,. sg:-..::: ,:,,,,:ii;-„ark,y j.-4:,,,,„:„.,,,-;t:c.,t,,,:.-.„,-41,:tg,..,::,..,,:.,...,,.-...„-„,y..:,..,...sitk,.:;;;:t:.,*-4,A;2;•..•..;.:;!;.:;-'.'••,..t..z....41.,.i..;.'t.1...,4,..::•••4.-1V,,...III','''-t,,4"Ctl..',••••1 ' a.' p•:•, ..'''..ti>.1 ' ,....'.:!'...:1611%,-j.:1;,iiiii, ,....;:t.,',4.7„;:„„i.V.1.4.fc,41411:.,..-;110.t.t.,,,:.,.,:ai--iri:i.;:.:.*.o.,:,..„3: ..,,...4,71i.,,,, ,......tt.:•.:1•:_::,:,,.,-,,:,,:-..;:..,,,-,,,,A•^1.-.1; ...4.,::,,,,,,,,,,...,7-..,:f.,-;-..t-,:; 11,;%,.4„...... ..01..?4,,,,:e4ii:t.-.z.•:.......•,:•.--.,1.1;11.7,;..?..43.,-.:41;;;,'<iv?;%,,:..pke:o..;e1;t4:;',.;:,•:::N!:•%4.,. :-:•.c..„..t:,..1.1 qA,i.:ti,,;;,.,:;:111{iii.,:. ::'i.:..!,!„•-2:;,...4.,..:.;,;.!. '.:,'„4,4411,tt;i,;-f`•--,4t .•••::*.;71..0-':.•:•Pli...4,/, ,...:1rE„, ,.•T ;•-,- i4,,„,.,.1V,.,.,;::.`;•.`,7-,;:,-!-,••:,:;•,;2;1.,..%,••'•J.;::,5..,-,!..:...s..,:,,•q:;?1;:a47;A:-.. :-.•i-!..;04i:-';*'-'t A,4,4,-.....4•• :‘..,‘,•;,. ,...".',...!.1A...::.,.,!;-iiii;;.:.-.. .,:,...,,,,-: ''',''n•i-,'' ',•`e-• %;''',?-t-'fgl'.....`1 4'4.:••• ,:*:-,-;.•,,•';',,-‘,-, c.„- .>,--- •• :,:s..- -,',°;sh--1-:p•444-,,.. :. '...-;.....k.,,,,,,,,:!.!';:!:::....a;,1;i!.*!::;,:',;.-....:i:,:r...;, .•;... -1 ,•. ..44..41.,;;... ..-ki.--41.1.14,':0;:tr.744-,.-: si..t.,;:.x„, 44106 .'-'- -V.;:i.-,v,„It;"iki !'.....`'0,‘")*•4"••';,';.;.-•'.;1'''';`:;•. ;•;';4*.'•;.•'••V.•:L:'.•..,•::',•.14Zifii.V;;I:.-'.. •••••:-*.-:-?;;;:-&;:iiS.,--441.'f,',.. =',,,..Z. ::.‘ k:..--..';'..,,Z7r14W,Oliki;.iiiiii,•iiiiffilii.f0:4iff,fi;iii;; , i':';.iii .,1,0;&:../. e'''• ,,,,,,'.,,:. ...,,14tt,*:" .41i1'.,A.,' .'',!:'''',/1,1#i.11.P"•,1,•`-',!,7'.:...;!:".•„.-;'.•-:',',1:';',T.1:.,...',,':,',••::41*,$-,7,0,5rtPIK.,.. /E4=if :,:.; ::,1',:k1;;Zr.oa'- 51.4%:'0". .44''1';':',ii,•;:ilifiltfg0.5ii.iilt1•5•;fi •9,?• k,,t,ti„,:,,-,4-.:Zttw...:',..:s ,1?:!..5.1` ,4..?;.'•-•:'1%.07,3 ;•i•rYrt•,,.4.,,,,,,,v,..tics.,ttio....:,,...:,, ,•,,..,.:„:„...?.):,-.„.,.i,,...,,,:., ,'.,;.,r,,.,;---.-.F,,,.,,iygi,i,:fi,p,,;•,,,,N.4.,•,•.:,,,., ..... ,:,. e4.,,,e,,,,r-,,.-4•Zitv,,,,g•rit,,Ixo,...".•4 :,..-.-1.-•"'..•••i.-'.-••,-:..;••.•''.•,-7 . :;.V-4. 4ii*•••?; 4,.:', -,,:..=-•A- •-‘' A.... .,,,.-,,.-,17,4„„t*,,e..,,,,,...,:-,;•..,...i,i;.i,:,. .,,•!ak.,.:;:::!v:=....---1,----.. 1, ... -..... 4„,:q...„..,1.44.,...- - ;.14,,„.3,7:-.„,15-.6.„.„ ... -,,,,..1,e..:.,..,..,,,,-.. .- ;.,,,.,,, .. i•4„, ly.r•,:i.,%s:4„,;.,,p:-..4',•,;•r;',4 tt,. „,,,7S,c,, --''-•ca,,•.•..-cit•:,` ,4,11-,,Yr. Af$ ''C•;:'•1:".;;•;•-:'•:';1••',VP:*:!;;:';':;t:te itrp 'nteo• pP' Jr°,-;y4 s. 4 Vs',..:i.s. -t-•:1.1-,.',':,!:':,-..,--4.n.f:;'. .:1„-``.it. ','-';'.4;7?11,...40',.i': '4......7.:1;';:e, 'tiTto• - '' k-C,'?....431....4.;'2,:i'i‘::;-, '",'j.. , lt''::.*:,;!;%;,',!i?, ".;11,;:,;;;::;!,;:::::: •:,r ,7,,,T,',::',4r, :ve,- •Aire..?; .',.,,e •,'" , 4•r•-+'';.:-..i.;••'k'-:4\--, d:-::;',4e4 • ''..g•-,- --1 -S:• %. v ....":. -•••,,,,i'', t-,..•,•-• .;"..r....,c.,--•;..,,•,..,,,,L.,,,::,, ,:t;.•;•:i111;;;;;•4•11,Ailitiiii101'giii! . ,441 .:;';‘t,:`,1.,,', r,,,,,,,.. „!,.,,,,,,.,,i;...,‘.,.,,..;.:,,,A,„'",..r.,-4;,!,,, 4.4f1. .....",,-..r-.. .‘ r!I r , ' , ,.:,,t, ,. rks 4` -,e,'," `,6!Erg!:e, ._.„.„ ; ,.,,,,,,, ,.,... ....- -, : :. i•.,,-.,,,,,' :;,0:ti ,:,,1. ...,,.„„.... .... ,„ .•..,:;i!-.:,,1,... ,,...,,,,;,...,,..•..,,---'./:•.-...,,,, =_:-..t..-•,1 c, 4';':;',,".''',1, - i j.1 . •1, ;..^1 ,,If4c., ,,,i,'-',1,4,41..2fi. .;."1,,:.r..,./.57;,/..',,, , ,'F'::. ''''.., ., ....t;. .:',,--:.:,'.- ': '-' ',.;ii ' ' '! ,,,,,'"1 ;,,,,. . • ,,,t .-...7. ";:.1.4et'4.14:#.'r4... i'.:'"''..,::'k'":'idai:,„dtji'•',':il'.i:tC'*':'ZN'''"lt.',!',i,?.' ..'4,4‘'Z'''.1','-i.1,- 'AA'', ,, '.,4111...!iZT:if„::`,.*%,-..-1•S'.i...,: :',4,-.4,,,,,,4.:„..,....1..;,.;..c,,-„,:,•,/,,?.e,,..,.,,,,',,,,,,-4'.4,L.,kt,.fi,,JI ; ;„, .,,,,!!.i, .1,!:.;7;q';,:14.,;t e. ..., ' ':14-,:',.-4 k.,n,4,.. V.,•*I.. '1,..•./.Wiek,??..7- , ..4.1 rl';: "4,e„,, 1...-,. .-.,,..t,,,A114 I'4..s.,• ., -„,..- ,. . A,—....,-,,- . V As,. ••• ..,..., :.:11, .—•.:.- t---.., •., .. , — .--, , —.,,,,,41.1:.,."-_-.:...: ,;,,,.. • .%',_-•„1,7-4,:‘,..,,,(.1,-!ft ,t,-4.4...,•..,..••.! 1....i.1,,,, t......:„.,,-.:.,;f5 ' ` 411.'''' '''''' ; '''..' '''it''.T...4. 'P" ''''... '.4''''-'-4,1,:,,1.1'''''''..%;Y:/-1.4 0-tv.c,14rfb ..*.,r...---z5:.1.';',--5- .,-.t-,,„;. --,*--._,,,.-,, •;„1-:„.1,..s?_-,,,,,:;•3::."-,:-..,..1., i}g!ill$Y,I", ifi,?:,•;',,,--!!;:- :•:::',N• ;,,',.,*•-.. : ',,-,-,-,....01•1 ,4,-,„ .: f-'0'; '''-',*..14-fler ' '•?:6.i.:.k..4.:'',?';',1.,3".e..J.'.-4.414...S. ''•:,',sp-ii-:-..„.:p1/4-.- --. -....4,,..,,,,,•:A,...:.?,,,,,,4 7A,-,y.r.t., ,,0„..,..,,,•.‘,: ,.,•‘. - ..,...4, .,..„,,,s: , -. ',,l'.';' ' . 1' '• "-f'••.•4•-•fe'Ilvi 1,11-;..1...jj''''":,,,, -...ti,T.-•"•:.•-r°!•••4',,'•,-,c 4 -t‘ ',if ; 'igev.-11, ,-",..!, 'ir:' :-,,,-:,-:.,,,:.,r,,,z,..",,,,,„,.:. ..,. ; '•;•• ';''.".•'-'";i••••• ••.t. •!1,,..-izo.:.•it40•4'Ffs•T4',...',.'i,t•:•,-„1.ili41 ,`,.t.' .t.' , A. • . '',• ;#;••••. - ,• 1'.rit5,• .--.'•-:*,. .‘,.•.-.:..!:. ',..• ,•,„:i;•"."4. , t , -:.• • .• .r•-,--:.:,',:.‘,.„-1,f.t?,-,„,s;4:*21:1',....•.;,-' -•T-,.-r ,,..-:.,.., . ,..- et?„,,,, ', 1 , i11 c i - Yl c__ . "."-- 0 ' _ r < ( . , d r��_ J 1 G c7 1- .4 •, . zi,. :Ali,'''''''.' ' --W 4.-- ---5— illiT) '•N 8 . c)....) 1 ,,...„,... .„.„...,„.. ., ,......, , 1. . , , , r 1,. . ..s ..$ ',..Y.,..:.-k...,. .' ..., . J C)s t x, a „ -- 1.l • • is ... � ' V j IL, . • • . .. �� mod- :._... \;--, ,,,4 • _ • . . . • .•••,.. •t• • ... ."--....,... ...• ,-,..1• . .. . ., ,....i . . &. . , 4. . :/-4,','• .. . r .,. . , • .,.,tr-2.4,,.4,,.._, •:•., •.•••.-1\1\\1/43 • . _. . -...•._....:::.,•••• • . ....\\......,,,, , ....\'.. -",... . ,- -;•!::,....7.'.;.;.--..;:f;:,,,--.- -:.4 . - . . -. '---'4.--.:-. . .`•*.?),..'.2, - . . ..;... • •,,...) C4.1 .... ••- '1,, -:',.*: ..:s.st,i',..;/.,...„•;.,-.,.tt;. , .. . .. ' .. . •. VI' ..-.,,, --'..---,'::•-',', -dz •...:#.1§ '4.- "*"."... ,•,..,:.-.-, .',,-,!, '''.:....,;,:A*V.',-;':.,. ':., . *. . \\..) i ...,,i•is,•;-.•.1,....,.•-....-.:c,.... ...r.• ,.....,,,t,, , ,, %.• \\,... .... i1/41.. . ,c . - ••-..'.....••''''' ',.''..'4410:; *4.)0:-, .- .• .. , . .. c,.. .....r - . • • . - - - . . . • . '•;..L•,c‘•-.;..,-41,..•i,'&,-....:•-,N-cri.,.•\.) . '., , • • . RI.1 • • ••,•.• •--- -- v.r,..- :„.:1; z•: .. .. . ., •. ..\\1 '7;VAIA•Sitgi-1!".4-\n. v.,,, .. .. .. • y \.............._ • '!:''''.44:,*'-' . . . • •Nb., . . . 6-...,.: . \ . ' 1.;:4-4..... , . ....-4,,, . ..... . ' . '-. .- 4-:.:,r, • . , . ,, . ... . • . .I. \ • . ..., - ,,...... •,,. • I . • , . .. .....-- ,-.-.... , . -2-:i!:'+':ii ,..-. ,,.,.'.".=. ,4••••,. . • i ', ,:r.rf,',....,..!1; ' ..‘i . • , . '.. • :','.• ' '!-V7,..•,.: : :'...i ,11t,tEl::,,- 0...1"::._. ., ___ .,, •-• .-....-A....i..----... ..- •- :..f:.'re,. ' • . ';',:.:.%;. .7'.-7q,- 7i17::. '''. --- . '.. ; — • •..: . - \, .e„'•, \ ..'4,\.'. • -'.'.;.-. .'4,-tic,-- . • 1.- ..... 1 _ ._ . ,. .. -,, ........‘.......i - ,-t ' E , , !..,,, 4K.,......--• 4". ...4 E .0 . ..,i....,.0..,.... . . ,..., .-.,...:_l . - .:: . —f-- c) .. -,.;•• .• •... , - -,,,i, c__ ca._ • -.....Q. 5- ... >4%. -...„•,- .„ . ••, . .. . ..... ,.. •:•-.0,--, ''Sttr• J, .- ......- $. 0 - • - —o ..30..i...‘4.•• D. ,.. .,,,....) ,.,,,,,_, ''. ..... CO E .-... •,r :Y.! ' ., '1 . ) . .. , .1C '.,,'flt,?",, • 4 -..----..i., ;!.; %..) C -1.! -www- 1,f' • '-r'f, ..., 41/4.,..) . .,' iiKr. ? • t t'. Li 4Z1) 0.......... j•.,.• -.A'..1 . .... D ..t --. L . - ,-)1---Ny.......c._ ..... Ec.......„..A . , itt....... */) 444 •1h.. ----4.: --- --, t___ . . ,••:;.A:•,:....... .. .,.,,, ...-.. 1,..,.. L. . ,„m...;._: .. . ..sC ••,--i . ,in SA-4 .'; .,," it i LL__ • , , ..,, ,,,t...,- • '.,••••,.,,,.-....,...; . ..... + . . , . . • ••.,,,,, ,...) ........0 et-, C. -"----. ....„.,,„,-.., ,. •,,,,..0,- . . I --/_ s•-,,. s,.... t•it's-•:•.‘',-;.;: '.1%i;::::': isc.,:-. •••;;0..:•::Ai::::::•;;;;;,'zt ,,:-.. ••.. :•iii:.::•'•:•:ii_iii'.:.Ai;•"•::.'N '..00g114-401gisi•:•",•:1),.0.3i.:? -: ?•-;•.:.•,-•- .*:.• • ‘':.• ... •• -:,::- .''.:.-.;•- :•:,4.1' ‘-4t4,c.,:;:, i,RiF.,.•,,,41,,,...• , • i4. ' . • -• •,•• • ..2:.!•••:':, ... , ,--. .•' . . , .,. . . . ..,,., •- . •••• • •• „,,,. ,•• ,,, . •• • F.N.., • . ;::•:.; • . ,.::a `,...•.,.. ....1:Z:: .•.'••• • . . .. ' •••.••..• • .•,...•:• . ,. •:.. , '. ..‘,..lt.:,,...;,,Y,;••,..ittNi•4,:i:,;;'. ..... . . ''''. s':-. .., .. ...•.,Zi;i::;ir;';'.•;.:.:Z,,,,•:••:.:... :......,. .:.tt ., „... .. 1 ;,.: ;:„. „..01.6,4:6,t;•;,i.:.31,. ... .:., , ...:.."..„. ::,..,..,„..,.. t::1,„'I6.,i...,,..:.e,:.,;:.1f;.;...1'.,„;6..,...,.::..s.:,•::!..::,.:.•„•....:'„..,:..,......:..f:.:..':..::.:,:. '.- .......,.. ..: . ...... . . . . ..,::. ,,... ..ii..,,.,ii;::,-,,,tl; . 4';'11`, •, 'f'•'::::...1.i.,.., ,, .•',, •.. .....,,t::', .. -,,,.,:•••:: itik'•::••;,:,t:.;•* •:7'.,:Ifi' •.,'`'•';:;•.-';,'••...4i44:':..4: 1•:'-'i;•: ":i; -.:-:i•-• ..*..1;.--::.:.',..,-, 4'., s:''..‘;.:V4P.iiiki'iil'kr „itNfti4iili*`611,411'ttl,•,i -z!'il:41;.•• iili:.::::.',.H...,.,•,,i:;,;,4,4:$:,„,•tliiiiiiiti• h, tit:14iit 1;;;;?':,1,.*1;;;H4s,'„'Ilii,'Vzz Ilk, '',; t`Citsli,si;;I'4'.'I•iliizz:i' ;';';''''`I•'•'‘W".' '•1:!Ii•Iz't; •il"iil-.}:iiii:i111:;i$4,i*141-t-Pi:i: 4,,::;.44:i: .4i;z4:41: *4',:',.':,*z.4.:;4*4.414iz;....,,`' t4itt:frit,;:',•:*;:i::.'-'.'',::•1::.i:i114 Mt ft. . ::: .,:,1,;,i• '''' s' •'t'`i 1.itii§„il‘z`11i,Iii4iP, i:,;ii;!;;I t•.,..4:1 .„4 4;,'..44 ti:t:,>.,.:!••.':.:i.:::•:••;.1•:tz.N.,?:1::.:;:::t,,zisiittzs3zt:tzi;I:1;:tizzz:A;i,11441:,•• 1 itlt.11,, ;:3.3;,,,?,:.: ,.: .• .3: :::.;',1,1*,:,..:1'. ,,, 't,:mi m,...,03.• ..,r-;tti:•-:2*::.J...34::::...:: -,,,::•.:., :i,::::,•-:,.;,...:‘, ::....-:.,13:::yt!tk•. ..,,,,t:::.;;;8t..q,1 t .,,...t.;::::.::,;:.;. :,,i....:;,. ::3.„.,,,,,,,,„.. 1.: ',,.!:':,;:i;,aKii3;tt, ., i tl,'s ki:tzi,Itizt:$0;!LI:o ,..::...,:,2.::*::iiir:i,,::ii ,:::,!:.:;....:::1-..i:, •:;,•1:!:::,.::::** 3..f10,•1:ittzI ; •iw:kiz4t titbkrilii..kiliggilpi:i!i:',.!ii:::i:h.: . , .r.,:::,:,.„;,....:.:.;,..-...::.:i::. ••-'::::`,,:;:i:4i::'"•,;.*.4i tr. k..' i!izei'::4'''":'5'liVer:h11!*:!t '''•Et-•,*4 ;•,''''..'0i':';:',--.::'".'!I:0,:.:',::,::;Inibetl(li'?: iit•s N8;,N*it•Ill.zi.s.ri.1!`v,.i:::,43w::::, :••.•• •,. . '.- ...):;;;*,.'?,.,.:• ' '''':'''l l'''''''''''' :''','• ,t, ::::::''.'''''It ''''' ••..•'' '••:-'i ''i• %'• l'i•t:i\'::":0-'''';',.•0,:i',;1,1•,•,4,4 41 1;•:.:.,;4:••;: 4,1.110,ii',:i..,.:::;;;Ilii!:‘'.;.4:t;;;;•.,..;:;iftg...,„'tx,s141/1},W,4•;,::,1;;;,.,•,, ,..-, -., ,,,,, ,,.,.-.....t.,,,-41,,,12,•,,',,;'t 44.4 .ii.tiil:;,.z.;,43,4t„...;,;;•,.;i:-.;:t.,. ,,,)r Allifillli!t its,:l 41ptir;t 31:141V;•:i-;;i•iiii i'. .*•*".••Aiii.)c-s:••••••izii ::4`.1'.:'',* Ittt‘,' 41.- /4qt•I',";/1'5•1"'.••,:.:::: ' ',•. •4:',•:•.'41:iz'•••;;;•`': , ,v1'44-4 ,til Ii:: ,,t;••,,0 4::iti!lt. ..,tii...,„;',:•,:••• 4 4i4Z? .1 ,!,;{/4,40i; i4t4i !Ift4i;•tii;:iii;!f\tti•ti.' ,;•,:•4;.-rr.',:; •••'•;;;•'.,•,',.''',1..,•:::;;!•• •••::::,0iffiltil-g7"AtlYt4'74: ;' -'`:':1'.'''''',••*f§1•'..4,441,40,•• ,',,'9-•,‘V‘,";:.., •'0,=!..,"; ..4;.i.§N.liNi.;.i..iii,,;ii,.,i,iiii,; ..;;.,v,0., ..,,,,:ro„„1.,•„... :"..,::i4tiiti,...:..i,„iitii,..,:iiti ,-3rt...,41 :*1.;, :.0:::'';'::,,,;i1,•,,;';ii',,', ,, ; ,„:•;.,. ,,,T84,i,j,,,iiit,iii'',4it ;!;''','ii7''','-i,111:,,q,0;j1 ,4•IN 4,, i'zii:i4i1:::',:f,hKit.1,i",,ilhiqi :4}`%, 1•1; 1.;;;!!`,;,',.';',‘;',,j,,,°;!:',,l,toill:gii.t.:44.4.§iimiN,,;:.:10.iTii,,,i,i*, *3I,TA.'3'‘',A?ii1,,,,•i.;;,;:i,.;:i,,,i;.;,,,?..i:i:',•?•,,,,'•,..!iiii3ivIt.ii-.1 1 r.,,ligt,e;li Iiii',. i ..:11,,;...-,...,.*,....t4 .11,P4.,;•+i..4,,i.. ,:'.,',;,..,:- ',,,,, , • ..,..).,_?3.j„,,„.!,.4,1:, .!:.....,,,, .,, tif,;..,,,,,..tof , ..;:,.Av..,,iNu;,::,,,,3.!Iii,•„;iiii.:::„,,,,,,.;,,.-;•.:iii..,..r: A •,i ,•I ,,,•3; , z.:. •—.-....:••4...,. .1A4+,.:. - .<;:-- - - -; r• .,-„, •,-,.,:'•:..,.,:.;••.„,„„„d-: —.1rit.,-7-...- -.*,„Ti1;1,,;::01N•3/4.:. 1.1.1c „:::t ..-zr' i--,.-4• .., ;C::•. ,••.- •'-...-. -- '; p,7'. •••• .. . - • 7.•;„..5.;:.•,•;„„ -,;....,...-t r.4, :,,. ..,... ., .r..,‘,. ,.!..--...,.,-,,,,,,, -,,-,,,,,Ir,•,-P.. ..4'1-t.-”_,4'.. ',',' ' " ' . : - '- ' '-r..".- 4:-,, ...'f'.,:t-=';.; '-,...,,..'.`"'..• ;`;...:"', .• /:ilili' i;''''''''::' .14'''..4••• '`!‘:1} ,::,,:t,1,1; fi'.• r', . ',--; ,Vb;110114!i100'->ifZz; Itiiiiliiii •;,, ,t h.:,,, ,i - , . , - '..', - .1'..*-',1T3', i".•1i`,,qr;.11!t,$•i'''':;" - -•'",:-- 1, f4 ,- ..-;.c, - ..:,:,•,,,,,,,,,, ‘,,,i,;•,;,,i,:„,..lttff:kcf,:,,, ,,,. ;•,i.i,,,,,,,)., , '!11,,11,...!,,,, 1.: •.. -. ' . + .,,.. ,. Iiiiitri'll,tli..; -,:,i':":-.•,.z!--.1! ,•,::::,?,‘;. -qi , .•.-•: - . . It, ,,4,,,,,-. ...;; :-....::::-.: ''', ..g , . ,; -, .,s, •., _, '„ : ••••,,•: •,, ,, :..,,,;i:',;:y.,::::,,f.,,:,-.ti ":,,,,,,,,,,,,..;...,:-.. , ':1 • ,,),. ,;-,.1',s1L,.,.. 1 , ..- 4... - •• . . , ..;•::•,:.,:`;•;:;,',..!i:.*`;:ri:liiiiiiM:igli'.. , -,. ••••• • *) .;• ' . .,.;.,,:i.',-;•.;‘•;-:-:•Sql;•.•:•4' • . . . .. 4. '':::. ' '':-::•;.:•:•:•:•S.:::, ...."-:,.• , .,, ,.:' •:;':::i.i:Z.,::::::* .... ..) -r ,.-'.' -• ,..:. ---,-,•,-. -...,•••••:.:::-.!•:•••:.:•:•:•: _ . . .. -...... ......• • _ ,r- ,;;::::-,,o'',,'.::.",:'-;;;;:ii,.:11 •••;:i......., ' •::,,:-,:•,-..,..')44iiths1 . ., ..,,,:.,f,, .-.3.3,3•3•!•3‘,#tr: ..;3t,..,..r.ia. •"4-',.`.: ••;3',.•••., ,,,,,',:!.573;3.,'.3.• •••.3t•OR • --.,.,.. •''''- '$33.‘3•,:t:'::-.$.11:;'...":.3:•'"$3$$. 0;;;;!..e.:3;3;3; 3',.;;,:,,,Llt:$3;-1' ' '•••.--- -. . ' ... .- '..•• ' .• '3 i'4$Y$341•0q$$.3'$:$1-...:.," , -..%•':.,-...-3..,3,• .%., . 1 'thii# ri,,;•;.;•',.}'',1•'..• ?''•‘ 1 "' 1 J.,3•-: .i r ••,e3,3 •',0 ' #s' .•' -. .t , , . y•r •I 1•1•±;34•113,3k •;1, ,' .iP;''.•,,.. .:f ".. ! N . , •;;';' ,.';.;• g ,i'; ( \ ; — .,_ '' ;`4 i 1;i,S £t ' 4:;::..:;:;;;, ' — 1 ' , ; <•x., S;.0,041: :,.: :?iffsisf#1:1,,!t,li,t (L • % . '",--'-", :':.•1R-01 ., II !1111 , ,,,e., JI:•••• .,r --:i' p e'‘ • ;'•',;$,1;,.i, •el:".. \., %i.-7.,-.1.;, • s . •i te rt'. ,.s '',".;)ii>•4:?•' "s::. — •.7. : I r,4:.7,0 s:qi 1,440!, 0,00„ 1.,-•,•f.",.•A.,,t,,,--.‘,.,-.•,,,,,0 , , . . • . .., .' i • ' f 'a'';:v',;I. \ a.7_7,—. -..,•:,. .u.7...,.,_.,4;41,s. •4.'4,- - *'if-V; ' ' 1,7'"•;i:' ':- ,. : • ' t'. 3 __, , +i-p, •.',.,.;::,',.:,,'',., '..,:,:::7„.:':;i:::.::ri'• ' ' li;.:*i t..1,,•,'..'.if , I ..',.':i':'.;:'.1;:;;;: 1,s . C;:*::: i';:'"i'-',.'•::•::'...4:::::,..1:....-:;:;•:::*.• s: „4-':;•4".."!;t1; 5# . , . ''.,ti3:,3!:11:311413::::7•;:•Z::$3.-'33;3:333$3;3:33,3;,$'.; , ',.`$".••,, •rr.,.•,", s. . '''.:V lil ''''',?;i‘!::: ',%:*.'.1iii.:ii ;"•1;"'I>.'''11 i;! I '' '141,iirtiqiiji•L;f;g0ii!g..rt.' %t:q.L,3,..-'-1.:%.(17:: ', „-?.y.::'::,;,,,' «,r. ,.;:„ •. , 1::0 1 r.;;F:i.:,:„-;r:' ' . - 4;1;ti Z,:i1111.413.}117-,5s1;•:giLt sit:s,-,:•iz k:•::;',*•!, rit.IW•l?••-•: .' . - ' . ',';•''.,,.' ..It1131.i82ti,l'iii;41ipi,*i‘ip=iiii,:,%•:;• :::'4 ..r..i;i4z;',4:: 4.:: _17._,,,,, ,,t$•:,,•;1,3$3,i;3;13,;3•3 Iii PC••• ...;:::;'1;'.% •.,.,.;;Ir •);;;;•;.;...:=;;;-,! "" ' •s '-' ,"1,,•4';'%47'i%.1);;,„Vb.::: ,•:Zt•:•:.:.*.tX ,'.•,1;}k.,;,..•fit„••:: '. '..e...-'•.:•,' I 1. ji:;:4ili:01W1h,i;;;}.;., •;;;;;;;;;',:. ;,,k'',''f 3-t•OV.114:1",!. . •t,,',...:."-!•;,:!,,1::‘,;;;;;:tizit ''":::',,:,i!%.1:i-,i:,1v1,4..1..4.,,!-,, .., .... 41'.''''':)• f.4Li,.1!i'4.:1„.1,;4•i;:';:4,:,.. yr • , -'.0.0,1 ti'.'i,' '. :,,i'i'.'::;.1".4';'...'•:::e:•,:4`iiiii':`::::`:`:$7i§i*,,, S e r, l r 'o Ni •'ji.r.,:••:: - ', , -d, LI. ..0 . 41 i•:.;.;•:•:-:,-;.:..;-:•:•:•:•......,:...;.;.;.;.;,;.!,,,,,k .7.1-:-. •0,,;•;;:•:•:.:•:::!%:','.1.:/:::.:.:::::::Z•z:::7;•:.•;.:•:•S.:•1;. _',:.', ,!,,',Z.;;., ,;;.''' •'• '.-.' ' . '',.''''''-**-..f,lr'''':::::'.:". ..'''''.:::.1!..i!.:';Y:ii.;:l: Illf:;i —:;;',4i124•1 :A- s•*-."7='•'.% k ",.-. ,;.'.'i.,,11,,,,,,,'.1-,;;Z„,,,1/..:1•:4„;:;411141•14., ,4,e '''', 7,,"' i!:AA, 0 -' 4. ..,,,::-.. ..,.... ' . , '4;',W•';':'':''.'0'•1'4,,.,,,,;.41,-%:',14.....,•• .. -•Pr; ',..•;.,4:0.0. ;,.."•:.,4;/...7....• it •''i. '4,-; :. ::::-.k: if.' s'...n.:4:,:••••,....' %''•:•--J-',*''' "1',•,%:.:::,``..,111:':,...A.,• :.:,i:"::: - ," ' .-.'",•T ..,, - '‘.. • i - ••>.„1;,. ..•.;.;T,'.,g, '' 1;•.,1;11;,',:i,t:,:0;:;1i:,;i 111-,11.::;1:',:k.*:;;;:'•.''.31s f:';'‘ -. ,...:,-A- to\ qs 4/ .'•'?4.• `k'n• • •,,,,s...;‘,:11:,;..1,,,S...:•.1;':: 7'.•;,•i-..:;: ;,..... '.Viii;'`•74ipillititiqi%*11,,,1C,;. .4;•.:;:, 1 .' ''' ''' 'cr,•.;,,1, ....,•••• ...i i . *:..:1 k l';'?,,l':!;T''i':1!`!.1111,1' 314'4,}a:ii '1: ')Vii,:i.iiir iii`i15,'14P.'0':,06...:;%1:A;;I:;.1rd' ' . f •'.` '11 4'4: q 1 PRI 11 i '4' itW; i 1 s 4' :34 4 OW.,:),,.%•t '•?. ' .51,,,:,,,,,v!,: •'',.',4 L., °-:..• ,:it :, $ 373#,j3,f „,;3 ," 3..$ ...: , ,`1,../,,,,:, ; .1,,: ..•••"' ,5,-,.,,, 1:2i.itil;:41 1,.. :11;:;,.•;;;;„fr, 3. ,, z . % 11,E,iihr-;:l'!;,,i;VA i -.., i . ' ';',:••' 117 liFIll'1,1,IN'll.qt,t1.„0::••"., ",...„..;!••t,l•' '';,1`'''''"1 , ,',.1 V ca. -,,>, 4 _..4 • . .-.,....... . ..4, i Cf ')'4' ljt j * .' 4iti`i'g:t;tPt:ltitiiill't:li ::: :til;l::: :i''''•.:.;11'1'.'' :ill 0.,-: 1:',A•T }:il!il 'PI 4i iZliqilli 4: .I.,i. % '3 • ...i . , 11: $.i,11 irt.t. .,..,,.„4;1,,,.... ,..,.., 1.1.1 ;1 :,.t 1 3,i:,•„...v 0 rl,f) 4y ‘140...6 . ...el' • 7,..,,,,. .i'',-,, 4., I t. i,,f1g...:..•Y::::'. ..-5, 1•',' l'.,;.,•1, ',..1,0`,, ,._:;:,„ ....„ :''',q;' '‘,,- •-;-:•"' 4 TA 1, :::.:1.z2;,': 6 ) Ct'''',%.- ills Iggil ,..;,f1 3P,..:%P P:..*;-'.;::: •ki,.' ',',,1•1, ' ..,...-,•( N., i Cir -, .t t .. .,,:. , 1.4 J-41r,„,-..,-..-,,,...,,itt t. ., ,r.' ilwIt, 7.,..!*:1•'. ,4*:....: I.if%, 5;. c, i-- 4 4 04 .73;...,, i•ii:, . t „1 .,„s,,,:i:ii •_, ,i,.. ,..c...,. ,..,3_4;,,,,i,,,,,_:_,..,....., ,,,,.. ..,..,...,_,,.., .. •.,...„...{44 „,..„...1,z,,,..?..:............,....„.... „... . ,,..44 ..ii, - r C tN ., ,.., ,,,,. .$,,...,,,,, , ,,$, $. ,.,..,..11 „, ,/, $4+,.,• , ........„.,, . ..i., ....,,,,• 8 • I.,,,I. ,„,,, t., • , ...s ,..9 1:•*i*f,„040111:;4Vig,i1...• 1,•4-,}•7 k' p - •,,.y.i,,,,..,...':. ' 4411 . , : ,„ _, ....,,:...... NEWS CLIPPING ci Source: R. skxr Date: r'C • �.J Square won't get Carroll stadium • District to locate offices elsewhere • • BY YAMIL BERARD Sur-7Nepra Sufi'Mire SOUTHLAKE --'.Carroll school district will not build Dragon Stadium at Town Square because it would be too costly to provide seating and parking for an anticipated 9,000 fans,trustees + decided yesterday. Nor will school district admin- istrators be moving into new offices in Town Square, South- lake's planned downtown, trustees added. That plan could require a 4-cent increase in the ' current.diatrict,property thax.rate, they said. . • • "I wouldn't be interested in doing that," Superintendent Ted Gillum told trustees at a special . meeting last night. "We don't; have the money this year in the budget." For months,school district and; city officials have been tossing' , around ideas for putting Dragon Stadium at Town Square and housing district offices at a; planned city-county administra-• , lion building. Last night,Carroll trustees reached closure on both, issues. • The stadium will be built on a 42-acre district-owned site at; Kimball Boulevard and Conti-' nental Avenue for$17 million to $20 million, trustees confirmed last night.The Board of Trustees• voted, 6-0, to rule out Town• Square as the site for the new Dragon Stadium, with Trustee, Robert Flaherty abstaining. Fla- herty said his first choice is dis- trict-owned land next to Carroll High School. • The board then unanimously: agreed to find room elsewhere for district offices. • (DV ) �Iff districtrict administrators' moved into Town Square,Canoll • would have to pa .•an annual lease of$500,000 over the next: (More on CARROLL on Page 4) gg fr: yyy would cost the district as much as parking for the stadium at Tower.. Carroll $28 million, officialss said yester- Square would cost about$8 zml; ;, day. Land for the site would cost . lion,district officials said..r, ri,4 From"Page I about 4250,000 a_ t a .The sta-21` ``There's no feal„criticisrq i�t ,; dium, which would have to be in the city not being able to pay$8 the southeast corner of Town ,pmillion for a parking garage over:;, four to five years,in addition to a Square, would also,be more the next few years," board Presi: $265,000 security deposit in expensive because it would have dent Buddy Luce said. "The site about 1 years. That could to have two tiers to conform to restrictions from the developer increase the tax rate 4 cents,offi- the developer's restrictions, offi- and the additional parking restric cials said." tions. are not satisf to build= "For 00 000 we could build ���� :• . . _ - -- need." � � I $5 Previously, school district offi- ingy what we an awfullynice administration cials had hoped that the cityDistrict officials expect to a P� pay.' building of our own," Trustee would help pay some of the park- for the stadium with a multimil�c Howard Addison said ing cost lion-dollar bond,package,which is A stadium at Town Square Current estimates show that slated to go before voters Sept.12,< 66 553 kr{k ii 9- NEWS CLIPPING Source: cxli 0011 - _ Date: ii • bSouthlakes. . .- library ; i to proceed j School board's expected vote f not to lease space clears way._ By Steve Miller Staff Writer of The Dallas Morning News i SOUTHI"4 —With an anticipated vote Thursday night not to lease office space in the new Town Hall Carroll school trustees essentially started the process of building the city's first library. The school board was expected to heed the recom mendation of Superintendent Ted against leasing 23,000 square feet in the Town Center.. . The idea had been that the district would consolidate . its headquarters there and share the the city. tax benefits with j The board had not voted as of press time Thursday. "We can now go ahead with plans for the library," City Manager Curtis Hawk said Wednesday after hear- ing that the Carroll staff had recommended that the school board reject the lease plan. "The library will go on the first floor [of the Town ' Hall]. and it will probably ! or a number of years,"Mr.Hawk said of the long-awaited and-debated ' facility. "It won't be a permanent solution, but it will get us going." Southlake's Town Hall is part of the 130-acre Town ! Square, which is under construction. The four-story building is expected to be ready CityCouncil Within two ears.Y • • led the effort too member Debra Edmondson, who has now pen a Southlake library—residents • • can be funded Grapevine's library—said the facility through a special tax district that the city has created in a the Town Sq warenacre area of the city,including . Please see LIBRARY on Page 2N. • • 1 Ov• er' 1 t 'i 7v to proceedLibrary plans , a„,„ y '. 1 • 1 r -center :Southiake site , 1 ijt.JK..... 1t y- y .Confinued from Page IN. -�tlnderthearrangement called .- k a laX'ncrement financing plan — '' ,' i t ' ` t tax revenue based on the improved w .' ' villue of the property is used direct- 1 VI for improvements in that zone. - • -"That's the advantage we have ," K'4 R' k b4r'e,"said Ms.Edmondson."And I `" ` '` ` i .: f°. don't think it will cost as much as �` :,- �a � ` we previously were told." She said a study done in early - _ /_ - • r x� 1997 found that a 17,000-square-foot ' ' / % liprary in Southlake would cost t about$4.1 million to build. ' x� , 'The library now being consid- • r ' ,, E eted would be 12,000 square feet. ` "We are not looking for the ulti- t % ate►'"' 1 ;prate library,"Ms.Edmondson said. ' 'ittcl :This will give us a nice library t1417 .-© i :within 18 to 24 months. What we ® n -will do is appoint a library board r '4'� and try to find funding sources. ! ,. _A, , .`„ `i When we move to a larger space, ` J► a $ -{ .this library in Town Hall could be r" ccx _ __ _ F ;used as a=branch library or a com- The_ Dallas Morning pater center. ;.The City Council informally -agreed last week to allocate$250,000 A city library has been discussed-. ,to neighboring Grapevine so that, .with varying; degrees of rote for now, Southlake residents can since 1991; when 'Friends of : ;; ::continue use that city's public Southlake Library was formed. + ;library. About 7,000 Southlake resi- "At that time,there were things dents hold cards at the Grapevine that were a little more overriding, 'library. like streets,"said Karen Apple,whb z. • A library committee was appoint- was president of the Friends board. :ed by the council two years ago and "But along the way, some people v :was charged with deciding which moved out, and interest sort of .was more feasible — sharing a li- dwindled." ;brary with Colleyville and Grape- Ms. Mast and council member -..vine, or having Southlake build its Edmondson were part of an effort ;own. to revive the issue. ' "It was governance of the library "Actually, I'm surprised this fi :that really tipped the decision to hasn't been started sooner," said •having our own here," said Cynda Ms. Mast. "We had made a recom- Mast, who co-chaired that commit- mendation and didn't hear any- tee of around 15 residents. "That thing for a year." •was not considered an option,so we Steve Miller can be reached on 1 ...decided having our own library the Internet at smiller@dallas- would be best" news.com. ; 4-444 4. i Le" PAMELA MULLER 214 WESTWOOD DRIVE A SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 4 TEL: 817-481-6644 OFF:CE OF CITY SECRETARY August 13, 1998 The Honorable Rick Stacy, Mayor City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor: As you know, I have continued my involvement with several projects which I began during my term on City Council. This letter is to update you regarding the progress of those projects. First, the committee drafting a proposed Lighting Ordinance has completed its work. Our draft should be placed on the next Council agenda for disposition. Second, I have provided example ordinances regarding hotel taxation to city staff. This topic needs to be addressed before it is too late. I suggest appointing a committee to draft a proposed ordinance. Third, during work on the Sign Ordinance the question of advertising on vending machines located outdoors came up. It appears that the only applicable city regulation is contained in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, specifically the section regulating Outdoor Storage. (This appears to be covered under the subsection dealing with "outdoor storage for the purpose of retail sales.") With this as the only applicable regulation, the result is not totally in keeping with the city's intended purpose. I would like to see outdoor vending machines strictly controlled. At any rate, present regulations are virtually non-existent, and thought should be given to adding a new section to the zoning ordinance dealing expressly with outdoor vending machines, (and perhaps any vending machines.) Councilmember Fawks has been working on this item for several years, and should be able to provide additional information. On a related topic, the outdoor vending machines question brings up the question of outdoor ATM machines, whether or not they are located on the same property as the owner-bank. These machines raise questions regarding signs, lighting, location, security, etc. These are proliferating all over the country, and we should consider what we want to control or allow. L 2 the On a topic related to banks in general, I would like to see the zoning ordinance differentiate between large, main office banks, (which years ago were the norm,) and the small branch, or mini-banks, which are now proliferating all over. The former are traditional "office" uses, while the latter represent a new twist on the development scene. The traditional bank was always a larger, nicer type of office development which could be designed to be a suitable neighbor for residential areas. However, the new branch type mini-banks are not all that different from convenience stores, both in concept and impact. The primary feature which renders them unsuitable as neighbors to residential areas is their drive-thru tellers and ATM's. This featur brings a totally new side effect, namely, high frequency traffic and related congestion, into the picture. Presently, these mini-banks are permitted in the 0-1 Office district, which is intended as a "residential-friendly" zoning category. I believe the city should consider restricting these mini-banks to one of the retail districts, with which they more closely correspond in impact on adjacent uses. Finally, Council needs to address the requested sign variance at the entrance to Woodland Heights. The ongoing delay is unacceptable. The result of this delay is compounding the damage done by the applicant, who is in violation of the city ordinance. In addition to being both an eyesore and a safety hazard, the risk is that his offending sign will kill the large oak tree, upon whose root structure this sign is constructed, if it is not removed soon. Thank you for your assistance and if I can provide further information, please do not hesitate to call. With kindest regards, I am Very truly yours, • Pamela A. Muller Copy: Councilmembers: Evans Martin Fawks Moffat Edmondson Kendall r - = `- - so y E ^ = — v (NI . b4 — ,o _= = 'd �en i °' o 00 -- an a _ CA r'N v _• Q O r1r v� 'd �.y O 'C aO W __ ii 4 ca= O O � oT3 F � \1 - -_ H _ C. yam �� �,'�,x„ - ._-7 ,�- . ,_ _ ______2 0., -..„....,,..„... ,,,,-..._ . _ ...-._-„,._., , ___,„ ,..„7-.._, , .. -, ..., _ .„,.....,..--...„0„,,,_...„.. ...,&_ „,_,,.- 4, r`� . •j ... ,..,_ . , _, Y oi -ve to ---f . =4Q - .•,:: '. 13 ' .-t): 7,117- ......7x . -•t .- i . g;� V 1 0Q 0, t = r .:7= (app _ 1 .-.....""'.....*** .10 (t(:)c) _rs.., -- - a, _j.g.tvio,r,- 0".7=4_sm -4-.:-!:;; _ % %ooff :. ' D .;.. 8 - -4,_• mo: -.4- ,...`-,..- - 4;,..16•.-. ' - _.4 .41!"%-'< `.r�-�+a�-nr.x ".Z-._ -J.,_..s?.: .*_..ri .. .._ '. . . � . . 't.via[rx-mid`. Si . ...._ t. 00; .Q • a4 $ 04 11 en 0 1 CA J ova4 � " 00 4 .1 o a; a . .� Qv It a•+e ° °�2o � • . .4 yoa _. ar �, o .0 �.. ca •.-1 U Et Ca car O 'L� .....44 ' es .-4 Cs+ 4., •...4 43 ala, $.' °, i h� Z► � '000 � ob wr . 0 y C6 cd CV; O .. Ov 3 cd Q, A i~ >, tai) X ' V J`., ei 1 .4 Il 4e ..., I•. ...... •4. hcia ,c��/ cC O O �. !{ 0-•.4 4) W ►• 1 4.+ •.•i i•r Z -- ._ . _ _ . ....... .._. ,. ._ (r._ .. . ,. --d ... . . ..„.“-„:„....-,_,_-:-.....„,- -,.......,_,_,.._.,„. . „........,... ... ,...,,,..-___, ._ ,...„,_ ...„„:„. __,_, -7,7-.77 ?...E':' ' Z1... \.. . H K t'a - SY7 f.. ,_ r+ ter.. A' -." a 1 E •.µ▪ 11+. ..� :-sz�`�.� O '.ram+- .. ... � 4 .i/1',`-• 'A�•- "«0 Jr._ X., 1`,1 4;� �-+Swr�V .i u: • •�"`.,Y �-` �-rr - fib:` w • •� i� ' '�i o" � c F. 1 • W.�. r. 3 + 4,„„,_,.,___.. � f ^'°' alma � �F•1 k -`..� !.' \ 2ai ,-. r, ca sry mini O."_'� / f c�.24t v.S4 ,1 6' - w11) .,} "-�,= l 01 - _ ,zbtp giikUotr'b kO 1 N OA1.4 i a4"1, S' rz ` le,fir ;ty ar., =�-. - ' ,„ • C. go _ • 1. - .O40 r /1 _ .� "O 4p0'4v O� •Q� �1 a 'con �" 4 0 o t�, y .r 'Qoc. U .0, L.. •• ,,,, _ r •.r V� W v 0 QC13 Q V� b Q. U CA .� a •.y t/� W il .r i y. ;1llh1I aii lull!! . wop� 3 X �'1 x 44 el 16; . `. E" 'b x�.,..V, ,-- f .,. 4w 3.. F • -- M • xis- { r. �f..__ g 4_ �y v41) s 0, ..„,„,a,.*0 ,:. _ .ci-.-fi - ly x ,-_e�'"'' s. a: - -ti .F.1, -` �,.�j O y yyam�•y 4) 4 t. — t'a�',--. , .1,766, ..-. ,44. ."cp CIS."'n , - ' V ' t ' '44 ' 1214krAppiripat8.414-1"43 -;4.‘,.."..41---'"--'-',47t,,. 4.1. - *".*.1":"..'. tt'.7-P--- 1 tr .coo p*ceo 7' r- o .Z+.. ram. p'_0 ¢' ---va d 1} C!$1 • 44 a-'d Fv-1 Z. `n % :Gw3., -. b - °fi x--r.- .,_ �- ,.--t 0.: "-W -i -' ' fi .b Q+_p�- 447 tea, i L7 Ucc N OW LU...ice U_ - �� v 1 E F �-: t rQ 00 .__1 s 'C3 ON O •4 c 4 ccPN � U o D., c, (4-, ,-.4 0 = 0 ' V" § 4.+ ' ' ./- �, °' > 0 >, 0p., `VI ; c HUll_ 4%1v v� 74 ° 2 O � d) on ° " % I v 4 ' C ° 0 -v °1p e = N ]4iliud UU1 `h '�' h el O 0 Q C S 0 't.. il- [� t " v� N. .--....--_- .:-...• . 1.) .x. 4 ig , .4 A ri, L. _ p _ `� 00 b4 a 11 "C/ ON 0 '119 CO �� 0ch :I *b .4 a•= tioa � •� .. \ x . � a[•. - ` ,:: =4c 0 > = � � p, Q A O �✓ A N V d • -4 a U, ••� o� ` ;` jj� o �; aro Ym , Ar3 X LLB- a:o ►-•(13 � � I.-•O 03 � • Z _ W a Q__ t • -C v v F ^ F ^00 eD s ON 0 ,� s 'X ON = •.-4 O O > p O > • 4 & v"a 00 ...4O y p N \= 6 izi a. vi 1.4 = 6 10 ca. ci3 i . `) v•i O O LL ti •� s�▪ 0 .1E.4 Os , `� 0 as •• a� a•� CI 0 as •� CI '4t t: 0 0 > = = §.4 ., , , c $ n . O cn o as O J Q s1 .• C2 pcir, ,D v▪ a Z C 0 aZ 'O `a ] •' v: Z 0 0 • si "0 C 7 <' 11 >N al 1Z) 4,7 0 r4 ...<\ 0 \04 4 a ► ar--� Z o i--• 0 P4 1-, I. 4Z a. •o .o , ; N F I 00 bo t 00 to a "C" ON •-+ s 'O ON b p O p (.Zr cn C) va p pw cn •— co eo 00 � = ,„ - gto CU0 > pa o ° +r > as >, p a w 1 0 >, = CO �>I•p n :1 v — y rr C.) w 0 v .•r cn t' U +r v f p y p ,o220 .800 a0 < . I v O .p2 ay "o %, Z a 0 o Q. 14 'v 63 •t % 6• ",° Z o 444 0 a, = •"O °� 11 b 0 w 00 y %.4 •D E ^ s 00 i^ M o F- 'b en ,j O cn ON O .5. v2. (g4.4 O •� ' a., yam• '"' O O Q r p p >, 0 aAt p 0 � p >as a = y b o ow y •� b c2. � o 00., = = i v� =„ > a >e., = a. Q ..ram .... cn 12 t b 4 a >< < 91 C 6 n \ %, 0 4.) ...., co, •..... � •r, .O p .• %14 � -= O .11 U El ,5 _. ` y O •° .I as -° . •� -� ate? I. ..� ,� �. Z = Oo = -o L 3 R3 C 1, C Fr >> .`. Cl, a c: cd to bA 4 ti y4 cis c4 O O 2 Q a.' a ►•� , ►•� o .= a) Z t 44.(11, - ._ - _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 p• • • v ^ 00 F en � -. . � s dONO .9 � .p •• im4AaP4, y - OO ' v c6 � � O O O = OO >, O > � :.„, O O >' O > Ag t - • ./ Uvcoy � U 4' O p 614 yC• p. d . � r= �13t •� «3 y �• .. 0O CZ •.,[. O ca 0 • a ci Pi cA a 4 ' "" 4.) 49 . ,O . .. (-- ..: " c) g4 ,_. : . ,. ,.., ._ cd ›, 5 crl 1 • ° .= 4'"6 > (43 >1 y • • UG */ � aj G . O : QbbA A 2 O O . v) ' Q c14 O O a = '� • ° ,°o ° p.11) ob y� >, �a � �, o W � . � ° 3 CIS p, 0 1.4 >, ya = � ti A a o c aD , . ►� c ►c o .= a� 1 IS r-•, a) Qi 14 i.+ •.r i-. Z t-+ Z - _tom ----- -- - - __ .r 1 o 1 , h -_,-_--.: is P 6. 4.,1 .: cn = 4Cel ON I � o IP p ^� 1a • cs m, � � O im. = ,s4 7:11:3 r) , s x 0 , rZil N •gcno14) = 0 k (19 ill 0 O " ,,/ O C 0Q • 1-1a' Ct 0-4 4) W 0-4 •,- 1... Z 1 t t E ll % ^ .- ( .-� E cn = - 9 , E-• en = w 0.. ... a w ON = .....,-4 NK j -i I: I, 33 4-4 FL'N 8 = i ,;) a c fai = • 4 ,.14 •,., .0 4"; ( 1 Dil P J a*co - 0 al • - ty6 a.y ". IA0 cd •- 04 1"4 _g 4) > 1 = lai (.13 ‘11 . "4 g (1)e-! 4) II' g X If* `./5 -S - a te .7"6. X <4 2 '1' 2 -3° a a 44'1 X <4 pry E •,..1 .CA 4\1.. 4" ..1 O a r •-. O 4) a.r �• O A 4) s p0 aCAb Q pO at y • " q Zyoo b z •000a � -d cla VI A. 'C3 a) O w ■ rCIS Qi i.. >, X 2 v 3 cd p, s.4 >, X (o d 1--1 4) W 0-1 O • Z `� - ��.. Ct M-1 W h.-�I 0 •.�..." H Z h _r i. su 1. oil irs is gm • a 0 O A0 > ems, � 0 0 M N , ._ a43 &4 .9. `/ c� v00 A 4 43 ii .....i C/3 = ...• 4-+ % 0 .3) it) E. •,„;-. .4 44 4 0,1 r tx i ,.... . 0 .,... to X AN -- i �' o �--� LZicnxclort z ` \� 4 h CII X cIa CISQ % O 00 a4 v / Lit O2 >+ 0 > 4 b •N .. �S - o > Q v; il. --,: = •ii `13 49 0 bo 5 , = •— .,,, rza ...t 1111111 �� y w mint z �_ � -_oic e rQ� _ ' o f. 1�.. y r% r C4-4 ki gat 0 ° V �* O ta 0 r '' O O >1 ° V. 00c�. sz c 64 6 fag C/) 0 Cd .7:6 ••4 ....1 ‘...., CZ rA " 03) t s„r% e.. O O U G .� v� U ..+ 0 aI) 17) p W Ct$ ` Z. O W CI fir= Rey �� pc/,`% 44 O ' 1C•44iIftl y vs L. .p 1 �O r••1 c.+c O O >' O IC) p ° O % en iti FA --. rz ..t...? - .60 git - 4.") ,. •I •cn W -. � v�•0.� = OCD U ° Aem� �. O O U y e Q ° p, v "d Zd ° at "� Z �' O � 0 "� '� , a - 47 p w ,13 n � cl, � b tit la �-r fU .—u � . w Z la ` 4 i ►.4 � M � � .= Z L N h. it v % _ L. Az 00 b0 ...,.. . E 00i 7) a, z to g en = F en _. a ,.- a, z .. 4 e p 0 >, O > 1 a,eg O 7.14 > c z 4fl111 * far Cn • o a y� Q ed >+•p v� • czt Igt ..� y ., �: ,� 'c.' v Z � O Oa (-1 .d ea P. 0) s•. • �v Z •`� p O = "O _ y� � � b p tz. gall l3 cd p., ice• �o ,o c]. $"' ' b4 N 1.r4v .o ^ L _ •o a 'd ON O • Q - & 00 11 •= ca.., O = p 4. L.) 0 0 0 ray CI) •oe = t du_ _,i 1 Q S� Idt MOZoo0TS . W . o a -ca °:o . ... alt4I...� ° .5 ., z 4to "' X `loaaD e 1 n �. a) LLB I-.4 �.. ... 1. Z • L i. % v $ b4 1 00 b4 4 CI 0 Ad 0 LI,, y :� 'b V ca es G 0 w cn :� .C3 U a -t ° 0 > = � = ta. , I 'to 00 > = � = gn G4 \ •4 sn � xQ ° Cn w sa � XQ � �73 cn rd)t. -_ , a I. •-• = tic, 0 cu (I) ...., ':',%ii: Z 173° ,ti0Q, o � � Z ° Oo ¢, 0 � \ c�v a 3 Cap, = = i�r >' bi) X • o ts % A.= �: >°, bbo - Q 4es ►-r � LYi � .E ice.1 Z 4d — Mmi 1... — .- 1 Z 1 C v .p .p . E-; cn r 4 NI ii‘ � 2, yw � o = •o pp., VI � � o = o §I ° ° >' p > • \ :+c po > ..... ." v n p ° ca ..y U v n p ° ..1 U a CA 0 �s t i0: 6 a ( . ,b 0 c� 'o • s l ,5Q „ •0a w sN ° QCs >,•o " 4 44 T'` cri ct 04 .... 1.4 r-4 14 /.. .;k CI 4.0 4• v) k 0cd p 0 1 4 y ca „ ,a/ c13 0 A a) e L iri h ` 14 v rsi ..r .0 • I 00 0000 E c� en C 0 4) a p' = .. '� •O "C) U va p cw � •� b U j 4 � IQ 0 A A. h ' ,, i . ` 0 a) > C A. = {;,� .. 0 .� �, � � Q a >, o a ka , r<<-c3 , ° aci) o -- a Q RQi " Zb aa , , un Zwooaab d �^ ' V >, a b o w 1 h V . a Q) O al 1-1 W V � Q •... XA a a O C Q 07,101 cl ,a 4c'S a O C a) Q �' VJ 4 ; I�1 W — 2 .54 - z i �r,`I. % 1•r .Q� 1. 4.. .H $..4 Z • L. 1 I . t V N I oo l v 00 by E cn Q s 'b ON O •= .. a-he 'QN... a = 1:). 0 ' 4 .14 .4".:: PO •I''l ,..4' • ato Z 0 \ .0 Q_, ve° 0 0 . . ai u) v = 4t A - p% •` . 0 G 4. "Sf G C a� 0 O O a� G �14H1 p W.a.4 1.4 Z _ • •s. %., n �` �1 - V h^ ('I Y E^ en Ea 'C ON = I: '' � �' � O p .0I. T 'tea, O O ^' >' O O 1 (� o e Q. Q � •O > pit a+ 0 .4 .� +.+ E— oa O O y b U - 1- •� ''c C/ v a tt.1 p.I. '4 `� 0 •a Q �'' �, b On. vim, .0 �}c < � ..'40 C y 'd a. vl .. c > Q 0 ?1, c.,3 (Z6. gi , Q 'ao XQ .9 v w � O 0 '9 v, rail ca _ aI. O COI �: G i rr 5 O 0 .. O ,o � la, d t.I. a � — a. 0 ,., •- *a = Izi ..% ! UIIH >, cd 'b i" '''' ela 0 0 $-I = "0 Ul 4 O — Q ° 3 y � g � � Ot~ � Q r 40 . _ _ _ ty _._...___ _. --- - i _ __ __ _ h . . .. b. % • - E^ en O E s 'd CT = •en C .:: o 0 ON Z •� w a°, tg 4-. ''' O p 1. , 0 A a O N' s� O Off+ >> C > F °v � p .b od 0 0 � va U � .� � ct v) a O a N� �.y cd co) �`,O ems 0 .15 co A A. v.,� ..- , ----- _ d' k ai +� > c � =cp a ,-. •A L. Q E' ....� co) cal v O a) ,_,. :r •a CwG liV ._. .4 ats � OOaWc =O oa CO) oc e aZ '� �' °a"Cn TA a. a) , . 0o � � 10 ,,� Z ° oen N � Q = °>, ' ow p bi), • ` bl I. r-lI J . �; E -� F� M = C F o ::,CL) a\ p '5 v2, � � 04 0 I 1 , C6 O � O O e O >, O ', are O .O > , � are O ,O > �- I c°, a 04 'dAI °va a+ = � . 'd j �, X 4 O� ,iiv cd C6 O oa,4 1.4 ...4 CC1 En 4-4 EU C 4 :1' " `3 —0 8. P i 0 4:6 = al >, O a G Q .O E ..4 c4 i d iC0 a) Q E .2 Cn w `, ' .% O 4) .--. y �, •(n .0 et % ."---• 7-1 CA --- C.) 4-+ 4"4 Ill' •B 18 1 ein.• 0 aZ y p .oa � -c � Q � ' ua Z � oo , � b c, v Z v� oosue., 6- 'C 04 ! y,� = 'd p. O y t >, os '0 y O w 403 cd p., O — wD 4h mac/ cl O A z \ .a' cs I... 4 G) �i a .. , 1.., I 1 „ L % E r 00 bA E .d 00 .0 a � �, �n O O wO > o� :At OOiv >12 > . �: s fa, Oy � 'O U . 1, a 0 • +.., Q a sa � Q cal G as. —• O O41t O o. "C = Q , O � lo a cd-•- Z = ,1:1 f . o a,o I , b g E w cl ct as fel ; . w ' o: at1 WIt—♦ O .1 1 Z L N 1 6 4- V ,. 3 ,., &. • r AZ P".• I^ en00 bA v 00 :At O .0 > v c.et .,,,..., O O °c. > • it •.. `/ CZ CII o."6 " ci di Ti a `1 "0:5' .. 4 c) v.� ° ° h.. .., . •'••� • V .. 0 . .,_, , • % • cn �p•s 3v � = U A — O n O O O. 'd o 0 aril >, ccd � O 47 , A ., a r-. (I) C4 O .5 2 Z V 4 y O = a) . i x. kN .p i.gyp I 00 I enb4 V 00 00 o ,.,_,, o` a M 'd o1 •� si: 4 O o=�o ra = .� • �; 4 1.4 •r4 ....' CS C4 6.4 4.), u.1 P. 2 v.,-,1 ill -a. tikik .-. , , eW A �' > c.1 >,° o xQd .0 v C re a% ..t g: 0 O cn 41 u O4Z-0 U = Q • = 2 O D U y ,6aI° clt Oo ayb = t CA al c� t x kl _ g 3 cd pr E $•r >1 b4 X 11.1.1 o ►-r CD Cr 1.-r -. Ur Z 4 ., y 0 ,�/ O fig.' \--50 " a I i 'b = ,,s 'd CA = e O O >+ O > c p O >> > i 0 a vl �, .. i -c ` O C Qj v, f,,,,� .. t lei .� V) w Q S. �• = ° 0 0 bA AQ 0 = —• = O 0 0 ,, A 4 y .� al .,. h O o a VI �v Q a %� Ob a0 w ry ti 0 O O 0 ' 1:3% ►-� 0 — O .C 00. Z -_________ 7-- i __ 1.-___=-. ,...- >. _ , :_,= 4( 1 = UC - — u I. �� UU _ I 0._ J -y A' C !V . lb 00 1 Wp � .� g-. .. A oa �� ' ' N ... a t te ' -y g .� ti4 0 ,0 � 'CO n = V c°, aa At p o , � .y loti cA 0 Cri i ii)' ., Ii w �` li Oo 14 �Q9 . y - = 4 al. _• = 00 09b \e 11,° Z .= O O a0 'tt�� '� va 41 Z 'v' O C s ' � .O '?S 3 cd cd 0 >> eta y% >7 CV 'b ea 0 w- 1( (t' . % 9.tV , tt Ni. - -,k ,,, �(wl .iC�► _ �r � _ c , J -zb- ,. , , - ,. ,L, i., li e4 ' 1 4-v\ J `n -1`';-11 a-1 .1 ., en ek0 '' Cg GO A = •O 1 �v0 0 o e '' O Ov >' O •> oo l G 4000 41 L 41 0 cw rA - = vn. t . . ¢ 0 cgs W v , cd >, �+ cn •2r td OE ,- cA L� ' . W X O 4) .-, • oG cidv .— 43 4.% �• O O a� G 1 a.. C 1 O 0 a) O -ey. Q •O ay •O y Z O71 O O a 6 .O ( I a •O a O M .... y x /,��03 ct/ O O Q `� i P.: o r•.I L1i _ .. $�.1 Z N 44 C ►-4 N lit I. 1 2 •.r 2 z i 1 1 {l 4•4q1. -1. E o �� = 0 a L-4 - Ir VI 0 tie! O G y .� v a i O •6 =I .y cOd ••=� �= 6.4 6 a, ca �'3 O cvi .O 7 64 � u ai 0 ay o •�_ ► __ og ,0 > = � = a y - `p O E us >, 0 a cn cn :..= j a o +r d + .0 co W �� o A p v po a � •Ob1p .� „ O .oa1 -o � Q aa) •.m4 .0 0 <._ ---.4 Zo � ° h4 °� 41 >>, duc 4' " (Va, , aa oC r 0 a = 1..4 ' boXM A ' X `� `� 0C0 ecd , ay h •O V v_ 00 b4 v 00 O4 v O O y ..14 T.1 "d .r clai g to „ oe O O `n y O tj b -,2 14q14 g: 0 Fi) g 1 Car>1 CO= $64 c a.. ,30 ,..._ ,d..,, o CQ 'b '� � a so 4-1 � d .d =co •y � a _ 6 et �. •eta O U CAo V .Ya Z = c c a = b v42 Z •y O o a, 0 :o `� 103 � ! IIH ` ` II EMI 4, h N`. 0 Z 0.4 Qp 1..1 ).44 4.4 •.-4 1-4 r`� cs N ¢ o` tob S..l .bQ ibr E •• I1 d, O toy, co O .-+ 0O O L'' O O � >, 0 ED > -g o• e a0 � b c�- r4 tiP O vl •.., U liJ v.4 Ct CA ..... )''.• a[r a'y '� `�CA •p .^ , 6 p•1.4 �ca .d O cd " 1 PO j}' U = y O a ca o �. � > � � oa ci3 «, so � Q � >'•o rml N, wmc = „ LP • �. O G a. " 0 V O D U OA e p o a y 'o ao / No � le O ,o a, CO •v � J • Zyco � b °� �� Zy ° Oa = •'E ca o CL, 6.4 4-. - 1.4 >1 A ill q11.0 p• fki Co a4 _ e Idea' y _AM 0 O 0 4:o ►-y 4) L� r-� .� Z 1 1 r . 4 .1 DAVIS BLVD. EA 1 tNSION We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or • any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, Southlake and Westlake. print name signature address voters# -N42--jam( •=2-3i..S . Jitoy id-ate S,E 2oi« sT )1 30'\ ') , , \ ,k,v, ' y„. -- _ A , v„..r, a,s--S 6-' Byk4,0 ,) rc .i, .Q.,, , - __. o Q/1, 02 S &ook i .4,_ / - A' Li) ZA) • Am cr ; 11- , artheA; 214- rrg,. Cga it o iiz toc_ ' . Al. I k fillt-A-A,Let_ or s //90 ,,,t ilt5,lL. a-k jG 742‘Z. 2e_rcw c*cam: Y£ 15S, 131)13, S fo`a 1 626-1 fl'lo ( ;z.�.' )503 w,',-,d s� ,�.� -Tr t2 CIS.n k 1- )C .?69 /� I iSDY�/1(3(X\A., o, !2�� 7/ /52'? ~ 0.,5r Afi9 ,e,f y 7 7/Z‘Z S�Y.Z tom- 1508 V.D;N.d eol- ) � '4 b&t k44 For b _ 11444 414f(/'ad ) 91 l u;'oho,Fay -a-__, ,4 T-)- 7‘.2 -2, i 1 n till r4_tiJ F61141 \ 7 ' Ijijsttic..��L- o�w , \ x'7 62 S 2 I r )2,45NW /5-0? c:u[i$A, rd n d-/a 1?ct11Ccd- 12i" t-ii-A 1 kj er lfr i .)5 11) Q2k21)--(7.I 1 5'q__Li_z _dv4,7- eyJVOKJ ( 61 (/c) -)AsQ)P F KesT-- / ti` Z afvt 4014,1/ 15/3 (A/«o Sow -LR--c i 7 xC . Alf. VIM POTPAitia _ ciU - /f 26 (Al r,vosO2 41r' 7>m it -74 2 i ' 51 i ro1 7bZ2z Davis Blvd. Extension We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of L Davis Blvd., or any road that migbe Dove Rd., between FMr said '1709 ai.e. nd SHandoI Mill4 Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or through the communities of Keller, Southlake, and Westlake. Print Name 1/LA Address Voters# VA,k_ nature /6ek ii/z�.t,&1 v el. is rot Ie1 dz,on ifivLd 741iiIA . ii3L-Nef\ tzse,(\uts -Voici-,6,.) '1; -c\\ k 9,4 T , "ir • `'I3CU iJnc1 )6eitires Marna A W Qsma _ItimiAM1144c oil 4a,n151\l'ir: •-11,9ati);?-. Kum, PDY ' in ( ,„:44-e-.. An..,. _,„...Jafilc,( fog_ sr Ilv 7 A 4 � ' /n ' ) / o - ' -,/f- / - - 11111:-..6 c._,\.V.c Alvc,k r-SC 11 cth.?,,,,a„_, -0A. ,, ,--- lov y sp,„,r5A 1-- ocvke... )_ 64.,kyli....... :Iiia.ve 4 • r_vx,A i4..riz d d, /00 4 S uM.K t l r' PA a rto k L Lia40--"4.-7-. z( ki/L gt;d/Uf" GC'6r.-t7i JG/ //.,�% `--,•GJ / --i � te , ?k.61"( v A/c/ft�L(- f-vt -'1t Z.o2/ !/,el- l/ -el // /7 / ` . 4 1/4 s - %ram -/i <%'�s 04e vArMill: '4.f bCf-d__4 .. tkt i 0 i&J • iecq.- - 9 . "ik: , .:,, /025)/,-e „..-r -r , ,,, 4 , ✓ et / i ls fct1,1 /bu e« atiu , ;2 , ►6_c e 1 an ) 1 Cil'Ail -5. 4) (A)ifi !-v l-61 t r7 kotx,i,k, ••— he.&2 4W/ 5"- / �h kdIr7/� g„,/ii_.z5, /!1/ Cy r, L 6(4 ,) 5 ���`�( AitL i� ;r tr,6 pi /. ' RANDOL MILL AVE. (1938) / DAVIS BLVD. EXPANSION / EXTENSION We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., %Ivor any road that might be utilized for said expansion, i.e. Randol Mill Ave. (FM 1938), Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through the communities of Keller, Southlake, and Westlake. PRINT NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS VOTERS # 13 z Ci,z Al-'Cfi 1MMr\w4 ,III u 44111C 0-1 4J i,(J, I, ,�.�� y_ Ice.) z(fi \)L I _ r %,,v /!/ ��(, JC) 0_ f '�ee c/,‘o,;z.;) /ALLLri.),(1 /412 7,01rw c- cr \j, c6,,,_ ,9-giA%-tc-- _,/ -13 0 h n i � ka.ru)e l f 1Cv / lO s 4hr� 7� -4 gam 2- 7 476 z Z6-)- 6c-Arc 4\1- L'N .14-4(1-2i 7 Cdh4;A44724AMidili � /1,-49,eS 4&�9d -e- r - /LW+ a 440/25 6144 4ititziA cV/WIA, ( q7 - -ttcczi A OlLiVarJ(1. /61P G--r4 fe lAv IAAOL G, LA N COS •— e 8 1 4-79 Gizortc4a 4 / „/ /4/?p �,�c�s -- Ath4te. rAul- (1461-flh t, co,yyj;>____k AQloQ, /P0 _ <AP- \,)ALE N'T i NNE 71 ,1 -i � � kn) 19 2y CnA�� Av o/ �-t 2 A4)cl cP e e i,Y L�ALL� � 21,6 l 113 2 &e ilk; c_ !-�9►.�c,�y /fr, oLLAjity /g'. Yd b&i \`/ r,c ((?/ c / / `ft7 t JIL �' 's 0- 426- PlaAli � ' .,� �� S� GO`J4joU_,c Q-N2t4, kykliki— /-65-tUddemkoJp P-0-26/ L. /� J I �/ I . i �Idi, _.c[J l/i Gra, t �S4 I. I 32 idarne-S CrieSa116"ke v76� ' „Si 1eO /IS k e zzert L DAVIS BLVD. EXTENSION We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 throughf to communities of Keller, Southlake and Westlake. print name signature address voters# =v6Q67r 2i Pa -ram. dal., /:9O/ � —00 ►'"7---- ----- ,/!/) fr:K-7,. A, /A,1 , 1 4&4 /11,_rj:f.1._, 7 /k , f: -.,_ ',--1 l-1 / ( '' F4 I,t 1,--(:5 Li.) - )~ cr �' l r, _(=,:,T ,_- /( t , ! _ , , ,.� it)i- ,•) ., , , ,_ , uo:-_:it ) i-, T ‘. ! ,,, , , ,' ,--) A \/, f v\./ D RE L I N uG ,� t ..�,-- Zo2c' V I st cam.-l'\I ;e in /..---,,,,16. 61)(P AO / / (6 02 0/&0 (!.&1k )y Z -&-c ,,_ fi Al pR A 13),Wey , 12L y / 7' / _����� 4 /Z-F — —700/ //O5i4 .';// 'lri //,bieeni J<Vezeit) - --°'4,, / X 7,7`e Pi c_-_-__ e-A-; L • DAVIS BLVD. LX E ENSl1)N L We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, Southiake and Westlake. print name si in. re address voters# A& e --- //z4.5,4- Brto,.roa - d.-.1-rv„€-. sit - - /J, Sys r— 4(7,—/za �j ivE 1,)4-1,uSov, /1-t-31 62,4AE g 60 �? • DAVIS tbLVL?. tXIENSlON We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, Southlake and Westlake. print name signature address voters# 1 1 with:i ems/ K. __ tog T2eAN . 64141-1 _ iF /00 A 'now 740- e. j ". .c o .r — .os Col\ . 3\(_ \-r _ C� L 5 �c'\ � t��1o.�"mac�2 —_ ------- • _____ _____________ DAVIS t LV11. tk I tNSiON We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, Southlake and Westlake. print name signature address voters# nvAL LEmitchro Y1, e 1)1 eri--i 0 1 015 1 e_ia5 1 r. tRna rick-,--T7r \) tows .\ � M.! IZ-e, a1 , ec coo.,- 7)-4 /v/Cc,n�-4., Gam. " -- , ' ._(97/,/--el ‘idT-- 2". .. .‘ --' / / , /r 7 0 iQ) /lSCnrsfe et " ,� v,rn� %' . -VAC"( .e. • �_ G 99 w P f�, Ke.%, ac,k rWr. ',-------,...-.21,, ; r , ,_ / 7-, _, ,---------- A-QtY, , i.,4 f,,,,„(ii lit .ao ., ._,- --t=._ 4 Triniitt . ,it�.. A ►&4 ii _ . `C' I..1 Roan I S (:1 I t` ►t:hi . i .11/ �/il, i s,/ a i L 13(2- ( ' --a_ t7 M7 00o`7 U,s I L.'t /LTA". Cam. -. - 9 v.,(40k, 0.6_,_, RANDOL MILL AVE. (1938) / DAVIS BLVD. EXPANSION / EXTENSION We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., r any road that might be utilized for said expansion, i.e. Randol Mill Ave. (FM 1938), Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through the communities of Keller, Southlake, and Westlake. PRINT NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS VOTERS # Ghaio GPA rt-i() 46(d§144- . / /9M ' r Pan/4e. flan-k zt,i,J Agouti ) lea' 6 p& A- 50,4-,a /,cz, , ,. , 4131_ Li ,,,7 ier- 7 cfrf... C A NW li/t(126(qCL Cr •67./. /11,04,814111 i g 4"4-42" ---) i// MR-Wee't''' citi; } 4aAii_o. /c/sed syl.,vizei tA, cri Lan more 1 Coortx a tmAkie crL lelvAdee (Pc — s 12-lcr`7 L;kt c fe-,to<�C 6 et. 34.Z . 7; -icgiAi.L.24,-, 724(‘ r`-- l.1 L (M�(t)u.- c- R qr.,(icy ���R 74:', � 'XA I P/5 b rnekAc_re, Perna 0 0 / / 5/ 4i-(`(,,kc-- Al-A • . . t,-)--,-,_ e...._, L DAVIS bLVD. LA 1 L StON L We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, Southlake and Westlake. print name signature address voters# I hpi <rANiT 7‘4 L.a,k v.a- Sr".c'+k i rd.(.(714. 25/y /o o f J.tbim.co4, 0?,1_ , 5(1-C E2-wbo ja/pce (_}ite..4-o 1��(1 i ( 454- lc-1 F. - ISac 'ii dsa-,, 4',,ec -----f; . -5ct w%l�'� . 1510 w, � g-- eru.,�. ' � � I 511-1 (ii ncilkoc ct.i �Pb �� I 410: ',r. /l 7 sorore.c (fT ' t 5,2 4/ :. l_.s 1 ( I sl 1, k) 7, , it. , - 0-4- _.....,...,______: _-_..„..._..:-, N._ i 006 -1,,64,c-re,14,,,,,- ier-e-o-S4--- GCJ � / j - ' '�� wl/ ,_1(f/a,_,Li-aZ � � �.— /o/3 /Exhi r dasikiwf — . ---- — - . rsctir-- irr/Mril r//lam a/ -L-+�w 6 -L --- F DAVIS k3LV D. EXTENSION i (r. We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, Southlake and Westlake. print name ignature address voters# l� 4-. 1 MA kik-,� AVF6 .101,1 rye Iwo / 7 /0 71T9A14 M ILL 00,A41/.04-14 ?ec.,L !" c. 0I0 Fc to LI_ I r 1 6L--`L_ ,i, ,6470-ii-c-e do/6' -/, _ , i.:a,.: WW15 ."./ ILi , 15.E 414404T 14;A _ tev d.. / AIMIntallere. /. / , b j I ,4 V ✓SQL_ 2 C 12C/9--L `-e-t_ � . - AV OArfr ith CM ra 1 / ifidiA 1,i,„ .,„ 0., i d Gol , __, f4-4/"../,c• by Ee! %,_,,. , A id / aO-T/ �w ‘.r ti.c 4 -6- 13 ob1-�I-e., 1_e ht S c-Gc�,e-r u- -U. ''',� a ow Foit4c es L'i c 7 b-6 z t-11 Cr('i(A N n i) VCA ; W-i- y 1) oLk 1 v--(),) u) .7U u 1, t_ /4 >,� ni <,. /A— ---74 )/ Jew ii ' 44, 7 ZCaZ_____ _ o74_, 6ti_ --.cr.).1. v-_ 6-R�z l I. L Au.R rat cc-- - ill k - L iv. %/Li V,Yl C1,$ , a I:. 1 f ick.Alces L 7 (c2 /' I., \.. if\... 1---6,,k_ PL4 ofyi-k: 2 id- 1 -14--)--(.04, L1 . -1-w L --17144Lemitgi AlvAt ii_i4,-E-- o/3/ j 1(02 6 Ir'1 1f li Ir /r ..:,C e 1 L -( ),1 -0‘c d - OG k..„ ----- ,- 01 '-faL,01-(}) (Art n(c)ta' fira..LA 4) (,.).t_c•...6Lt < .)_),61 ,_;-6-„Liliz_c, k02_ --)6)/6,2 Z `'I 1 el z , - -, . . , 2 L . Davis Blvd. Extension We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd.,between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, South Lake and West Lake. Name Address vaiggimaiiisimitaimatiiiiiidammian 2+ i e- IAD L Co ri g t 11 Q I A 070 hp Da, itz two c-—TY 7c,a Gk . /11v0 boo l- w _�RA'1'er .<.ghekA,;_)_0, th i '`3b ((Jou9L-0.0.),,) Ke)1el , L . . • • k(�.t.. DAVIS BLVD. EXTENSION We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, Southiake and Westlake. print name )/ signature address /� voters# Ai m s ZlgR J O N .�jr_.--,,� L / 0 '.71 w+c; Z..... !` ±4Y ON N Vfl11 M- n2A 7t/, t3 C// a;41,- ;\1 * a/ �D �r��c/ / 40,,,,,44_7-,K iG ‘z ig4 I P ( 6 S - al 'NX)r,(v 2,2 4 a - �� .4( fit'OM/O4- >(v L4\— /1 nil 1I_ OM foe 134 ')'i) 5.OV't1-/ ' i.- 2 Z5-, 'i -5 r t/u 4/---- J '',-‘,774 k,ALLD J D!` eat-T-- gtTi.-(� l✓---(7 3Lv 54-(,'(4. r A/1-md/4`-Fr 7626-; m (4r, 7 i iiiee_ed : -cam— a 3Z 7 %r 44-43,f i,( 77(.:--- 1.341 A fri t•3x 1,-A% 9-F-- -17 _4(M4e;t4.11J//e,err--'4"-t-e-<, ;3 /0 67/m),4.c.5 -) ,,,.._ /6,,,f,vok /--7, -7e,?(,—?..... --.:::,:th L3M-it-C A(2 f, ,v_uzvd, 02? D Fit/AI k e 4 1-Pt- l�Ucl.+�lr)(CL'r. t�G' .7.�L 6�' k.-1 ?c l' c c-S 0--t x G _ - I/UO FOuik ft . 1 R Qn ok� ( X 2 21 R Q-k(.,1 I--' 0 Q6kci.. .(.- oiv ,YkJ f I i ( , I Y �. _KCI!d adjarE5c�-Z/e 1 -( :7?(f f 1 61)14C5 -5flivika,'7 4 (,': iu ,%),4_4L 1A4 ( c-x" (.0 c.+ ,, =,'- r-< <1 1-e__ i 1 -- - et �` , /1 -� CL a//(-r7 1L ,,' / , (:.(i (_/ ), v� - ,' �;' / �r / �_ . _ <- ._ . —�ti kzb i._N :Ac1(—t)- i, k _ lir"l _ Is-0 'v/ . 6,2�.Z— .Q Etta W k q, �<<cc ) 14(441 d 26 - Davis Blvd. Extension We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, South Lake and West Lake. 1 2_ 111H6' -11111k, ..01111111#,- —111.._11/411. 3 Q vr ► >'►is l7g5 Kire sw �4 71 7r // J f1 1�1�1 to /1/1.IT 9 /[�� / �G17�. Vr 5- r `` iP._ (te kc bfiAAni Fa.up&A kryt, ik e *Jell? Sir &A d / `t<, 9-r- 1 t D LUZ-(-km _ _�- Altd//iri�'�� / 5 ITCH cs-5 `j/}'1 .OW /0 F k Z-6 s ri,‘ `mil t u- /( q�? A7o/pai ,0,e 4Z4ie /5 kk,,,Jcuc-n-t4' 5 c I I (CI i a 2 cd 1r14)dr Ct X1-4\k-) - \''Aias-A1 1 ' igtcti /e,k,c /1- SATJ 2 2 2 2- C.,3 . 56(i ` L Davis Blvd. Extension We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e.Randol Mill Ave.,Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd.,between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, South L e and West L yak 1ti ij (5�'( CS 4pz ritta ,N Addr s / 0,9 LK 7&z i o` hag,vC GALLIn/S a�‘,1 16,a0G , tiLL So4rtiiRct- 7X 7/osa.. 11111Wirtialig du Lkati t4-y\ ►ma R l oki'I I flue V1( .e 1'V 76a&.a 1),,b01%-e. l�s Cd&e 55 G/ a k c .t \\ J r`-G l � pwbii- rexutkze,L_ coy .1 r Davis Blvd. Extension We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, South Lake and West Lake. Name Address I / 1 ,1,00 Lt ,,?A 64)-0 LW Ar, , i)(64/410 7k, 'o ,A 1-0&,0A3)._ ic)--a-c II\ .. .-,T ? c,, t( I, 1 iiiimmimmillimmilimilinWillim t( Da /( s ILi-3 z Cant +I Dr aim . -740 2 6 Z 5'-A iv eg o c7s,0-c t/4- a o ; SPA r i fI Tit- , /2-0&,3 a K c 'Tx -1 6 a C Co 4 604+ 24-3 5 rr 7 Z.6. -Z Q as 3 - C? c - R om- `1G)- V")) 2q-lni nos ZOO bog- 6-1-4 NK Or, 5ovtk141 Ti .70012. 5( `., eh cJj0dhr lAk Z 1I(0 ` ob -o L�r\k�)r :(_:1 I4k.t Ir.7Go� �,n tilt'u( ire t -(1 Icy, 7Ty 760 o( "ti'lligi-- If. ------ /0'7 gil,(A,Le- 7- ,Pei /1./64 x 26 11 0. . L)Ltz- 129KAmisc-N fa Tx 7t2LA 3 ,,_/ jr-`lc' �.J ►--d: 1 m1' I ) I . 5-0t.-{'�je f r_ j �C1 �' L /z Davis Blvd Extension kiv We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion 9f Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave.,Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities,Of Keller, South Lake and West Lake. Name Address / P .. . /3s,, %/.�� `�z ei_ , i 3 tdr-L-1---.0 0.6b_ ,- tei 1 0 1 11 1CLE- L E - 5 .� a 3 � n 4,1),t Zrh,"/,(2 /375 ',ink,ii.G (i jiQ/I6AP' 71 2z 2 I �l 17 0( 5 Pun—c1 1— 74 oft 2— ? ...,—VALti4 :04,-i— 17E1 110.1 1p ._.) r ` k 17g'cr l< /N 6,5 i.,Ucro) 76 0? 1jq A;i06sobo,0 DIe4 -7(0Oq z /z Illg_1 111\110 / 7q`3 K(1r iJ i 00') /3 ..t,, ' c ro_o_s cf,c,c) )/1 f ci-e___ '76'0 '' /r WO= ..., _ . 0 • -rd4aL_ )4 ,..... / : 441 . 0 7 i, 5,, D(- 7Zo2 1 VY 4( s' v It 11 ASo3 - ac , L` . 76o 9a- (I,,, f • 155g10. Ni111,/67141 -- -00 c,.-- 2 Davis Blvd. Extension • We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd.,between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, South Lake and West Lake. ame Address 1, , 036-0 L l ic- 14.610 Woadkiaun C - T 3 ,--} I SIS?r Gc enOttw&1 c i. < U.fic ,TA. `7(92-4 Z g ,,a,„..s422,,,,.._ ,wo- v,),„_,(4,„,„ as ,.7„ ,,22_,,..„ S p ,, / / ‘ 6,(�� az6 Zr L ` ' / / 1, _ 137c _ , a o( li ( yes- Adi di . ��. 7‘o Z / , t / 1, * 4, (--/j---4et; _ 111 1/' /Va , (i .. irop viiMMIENmiolivisimili- i• ffi minsim.--- Lem-Avni- A. mw..r....,,......._-_. �4, , , . 11 z i c 1/ r /Soy .ots 1C'-f f,('iclokr- ._., is-.10 141/4 -• /S 3 , 1‘° i - / / l>u K. L 4 -' Ar2 -/ i %X_ �-� I > . (mac,.. �'`-' i s- l,- ,,, Davis Blvd. Extension • We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave.,Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd.,between FM 1709 and SH 114 through to communities of Keller, South Lake and West Lake. Name Address I , 41-ch, c57714 /06 306 ---0 -L,)► k C-f- 2 / I�Q` /4 `-( ' i i ` , , 3. W r� `1 /,o / /e / e• , / i 7 - . --- 9 02, / p , , , , c, co, Z i " i\ I / 1 ?-, `- 2-a1 goG-0_Lr_\�L L - Lrt Ei U.( �- f �� 1/v , i 2,4 r i 0 lr i• _ , ..' Lt l .20 ( i ` 7r . y, Ad- zd6 1,- 0- cl' 0,-. �; t 1e-3�q-13s4' F. o .11 )Aj- .lt) Bob- D - Lik (! b• I I i q :-.--, e,,,,,,4,---,t ,/z 86- -- 0-Z4 -14/14it'ii- ) )1, v hmt U a1 -1- - 0 LIoL 59011-1110 , `x 13, \/ • r/4 -a 6 6 - X-./ k -c„.,//; 4 gjS I r (II ' / I , r Is, a � o gob " 0- i/7k .sott7hkiL�, , I , 71/6) J-) --1 1hIQi L . . • __-. )-or--c.c-c—i-ea--ke_ ' Davis Blvd. Extension We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through the communities of Keller, Southlake, and Westlake. Print Name _ • ature 4.c Address Voters# I ,-3,Ac ,..)6,1.). t 3k41 Rci . ,.. . 3 . _ , /'97G -7 , `I`- c ( ‘ e�yya ri..r.c/h- //c 7.47` :‘,(_,./,(z)/4__ `/`7iui,f g pC�i�-/4'M 9�(. sEGiarc, T e .-4 d• ., ... , !hi.ctAk, c-bvp_o-nilmi\K, ok.t --11-4 t. A k() -7-1 /�: ! �55 / �J/ °5-CI'rig c�^-rt�v` --?rye I ( i .7 ' / s 0-0-ridivS For-- .,--- "--triiir --ikt:6x40-Krcow,2,-4_ -1 1-1 Ovs-r--0,43,--"N -12. , ! ., MMiqcoiej7b1 Ove)-( 4 7)-- alA //1 / / 20c C9ve- G1.t/0 ��7 IR-kd -0f(1Ulr4\S �n 1 �S°I 0VeXidYkC I�ct�\ Davis Blvd. Extension We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through the communities of Keller, Southlake, and Westlake. pt Name /� Si ature Addres) Voters# 3,-.-Iid)A0-772,z4 1/"7,7464.24-2-,- .39 -- gC. N r- /c t C+w..PrR_ROv) �� ti� Y Joe ✓l ors/ , e//i itah/;z. ---5;e6-1.1 / r .E/z "eg-. 701 (--+ a l d'cir - /i scie pilly Mh • Vrr�soffo tO l%i C;4 .- /Uri Y!'% I E Jeteeys hj tq &06-774-„i e4e/i . ilpa51 71 '*aA21,'Yld'Pj 9,t f ' , iv. L /`/ 1c)-2& izoitir'Y--ai N 0_1:1-110PDA)M'Y�C( ►.--� I J QQ UkThL O7 ra dt .. AV 6.:cAee- a i - 7, %2- yeWE:rfviv / //��'/� /1 d#ie'eri 2 7x4 1 .- �a,f\ ics Q . • L01( \-vWIaA- %. It a- ,.... CPI -2— niQ_At 16,A, --k.. / . i . , `w�U )-A.1Dr)�^, A,p,( ,r '(id - (. D `/6 .9vrlGinet_ l,e- -_ &€1 w1 ls(-).) 6 0(/ 0 vai . L Davis Blvd. Extension We the undersigned hereby acknowledge our opposition to the expansion of (Up Davis Blvd., or any road that might be utilized for said expansion i.e. Randol Mill Ave., FM 1938, Precinct Line and/or Dove Rd., between FM 1709 and SH 114 through the communities of Keller, Southlake, and Westlake. Print Name Signature Address Voters# , . JA G i i-- _AI 2_ dery ,--)---iiii/ .5 32 iohli5ezia mic)Aq&I #0 iii)A0 --;- 6/2 '-,"'kn,-(-r.,,,--) 7c'c4 i) t.'"' (Q n .LICtrrCiA01\ 'KW A, \'irn..,ef- 1, Lv i r\ it Akcy,r,o,')i-r-cu_o__ Op )GLY34\kt cm-, --,a. W-5 CArneuroc, Tr-ct; 1 I/ 4-; C2 1 p '2'6-- Cf'II, 4fiatediti //v4 i Ckf \5-\- - I •V\A tm(214.(A2kiliiKiu buttift606 efi rvio,r r ori Tri, 47: ) s Li 7, ...__, 75 ( A/..,,, , f, . 14. ---- zziove4 ,1 ii4 ''a/ sc-r1 \4- IL.:4 l ,-- 7e- .720 (... .,f : la Li_sa_ Ler, e-r- r-g6ja ‘$gArt_e,_2 9/Co CAiL.90,,t „lia,,o 4i7-1‘) .b. &-rik,r6a- 0e.t_ct-,A-- e____—, 711, gfrete-L-4-,r, riz, L . --‘ke 1- (7) f CAI, --Lii: ,-, c e;- /, ,-, , ./—N, ,, l ! -7--" ,„,,, y ,, ,,,Y(-)- iqiiik 1,-, ..7-_-- R01(f- -Lo_.,--;'-i,i),-a,, /4-,)-lil &()/ 01A-vie.,,c1 T r ,54_ • i • - _Ln,.._ A-CL f\ .--k,.N_, 1 C : : ,.T:ff L A GENERAL FUND Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended July 31, 1998 (Ire with comparative actual amounts for the period ended July 31, 1997 (fiscal month 10-83.33%) Adopted Percent Actual Percent Month Year to Date 1997/98 Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES 7/31/9$ 1997/98 Budget Expended 7/31/97 9/30/97 Expended Ad Valorem Taxes $170,004 $3,940,171 $4,036,234 97.6% $3,431,395 $3,464,261 99.1% Sales Tax 200,234 1,823,598 2,717,500 67.1% 1,348,394 1,930,016 69.9% Franchise Fees 0 821,855 801,030 102.6% 849,299 939,599 90.4% Fines 60,852 546,865 515,300 106.1% 417,256 509,328 81.9% Charges for Services 52,238 465,030 551,550 84.3% 288,740 354,555 81.4% Permits/Fees 237,787 2,357,550 2,264,710 104.1% 1,986,600 2,525,797 78.7% Miscellaneous 41,142 155,970 113,975 136.8% 139,195 130,203 106.9% Interest Income 14.145 144.626 155.000 93.3% 137.608 185.630 74.1% Total Revenues $776,402 $10,255,665 $11,155,299 91.9% $8,598,487 $10,039,389 85.6% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $22,040 $181,772 $241,365 75.3% $210,152 $242,575 86.6% Human Resources 27,108 180,237 172,288 104.6% 115,151 144,948 79.4% City Manager 36,475 277,730 362,173 76.7% 415,111 499,939 83.0% Support Services 180,014 1,227,691 1,211,717 101.3% 975,061 1,497,945 65.1% Community Services 31.235 273.262 368.934 74.1% Q Q 0.0% subtotal-General Govt.Dept. 296.872 2.140.692 2.356.477 90.8% 1.715.475 2.385.407 71.9% Finance 36,900 332,929 420,717 79.1% 366,946 418,017 87.8% Municipal Court 22,490 211,743 282,869 74.9% 198,826 253,010 78.6% Municipal Court-Teen Court 4.672 44.456 55.936 79.5% 37.829 48.370 78.2% subtotal-Finance Dept. 64.062 589.128 759.522 77.6% 603.601. 719.397 83.9% Fire 176,634 1,379,984 1,569,067 87.9% 1,153,345 1,460,111 79.0% Police 295,086 2,294,379 2,681,325 85.6% 1,846,899 2,242,915 82.3% CSafety Support 121.475 813.358 1.010.948 80.5% 811.910 975.419 83.2% Ld-Public Safety Dept. 593.195 4.487.721 5.261.340 85.3% 3.812.154 4.678.445 81.5% g Inspection 58,736 441,860 605,723 72.9% 394,845 474,511 83.2% Streets/Drainage 111,728 673,633 927,057 72.7% 594,418 903,988 65.8% Public Works Administration 105.039 654.752 873.719 74.9% 541.744 490.191 78.5% subtotal-Public Works Dept. 275.503 1.770.245 2.406.499 73.6% 1.531.007 2.068.690 74.0% Parks and Recreation Dept. 184.667 957.663 1.318.066 72.7% 795.709 1.013.013 78.5% Community Development 61,271 400,106 573,514 69.8% 378,971 463,551 81.8% Economic Development 9.700 81.801 116.975 69.9% 71.442 90.319 79.1% subtotal-Community Development 70.971 481.907 690.489 69.8% 450.413 553.870 81.3% Total Expenditures $1.485.270 $10.427.356 $12.792.393 81.5% $8.908.359 $11.418.822 78.0% Excess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenditures ($708,868) ($171,691) ($1,637,094) ($309,872) ($1,379,433) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND(USES) Proceeds from C.O. Sale(net) $0 $715,547 $715,547 $842,184 $990,382 Transfer In-Other Funds 58.333 583.333 700.000 Q 633.000 Total Other Sources/(Uses) $58,333 $1,298,880 $1,415,547 $842,184 $1,623,382 Excess(deficiency)of Revenues/other sources over Exp. '.. I $1.127.189 ($221.547) $532.312 $243.949 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $2,597,602 $2,597,602 $2,353,653 $2,353,653 ENDING FUND BALANCE $3.724.791 $2.376.055 $2.885.965 $2.597.602 fund balance percentage 18.6% 22.7% L .... JUL98.XLS w WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended July 31, 1998 and July 31, 1997 (lbw' (fiscal month 10-83.33%) Adopted Percent Actual Percent Month Year to Date 1997/98 Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES 7/31/98 1997/98 Budget Expended 7/31/97 9/30/97 Expended Water Sales-residential $973,194 $4,368,067 $4,887,500 89.4% $2,940,399 $4,425,797 66.4% Water Sales-commercial 106,309 673,543 701,500 96.0% 464,049 657,807 70.5% Sewer Sales 100,673 831,049 920,000 90.3% 639,230 811,624 78.8% Sanitation Sales 54,792 524,410 534,000 98.2% 423,908 508,224 83.4% Other utility charges 40,071 348,937 359,000 97.2% 334,170 409,950 81.5% Miscellaneous 1,520 44,405 91,600 48.5% 78,144 92,063 84.9% Interest Income 7.124 63.216 77.000 82.1% 58.596 77.196 75.9% Total Revenues $1,283,683 $6,853,627 $7,570,600 90.5% $4,938,496 $6,982,661 70.7% EXPENSES Water $452,344 $2,569,427 $4,426,137 58.1% $2,295,015 $3,971,926 57.8% Sewer 70,909 587,315 795,475 73.8% 722,768 727,546 99.3% Sanitation 41,886 367,046 500,000 73.4% 312,256 445,205 70.1% Debt Service- Revenue Bonds 215.355 1.478.881 2.062.490 71.7% 1.341.718 1.817.529 73.8% Total Expenses $780,494 $5,002,669 $7,784,102 64.3% $4,671,757 $6,962,206 67.1% Excess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenses $503.189 $1.850.958 ($213.502) $266.739 $20.455 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND(USES) Transfer In-Other Funds $69,512 $695,120 $834,145 $581,808 $698,170 fer Out-Other Funds (583333) (700.000) Q (633.000) Other Sources/(Uses) $11,179 $111,787 $134,145 $581,808 $65,170 cess(deficiency)of Revenues and other sources over Expenses $514.36a $1.962.745 ($79.3571 $848.547 $85.625 (lime JUL98.XLS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE HISTORICAL SALES TAX REVENUES L9e8 collected budget balance to date balance percent $2.715.000 $2.097 561 $617.439 22.74% FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc MONTH 93/94 -Dec 94/95 -Dec 95/96 -Dec 96-97 -Dec 97-98 -Dec October $99,408 95.1% $89,951 -9.5% $128,689 43.1% $161,892 25.8% $237,164 46.5% November 50,623 20.2% 52,099 2.9% 111,917 114.8% 135,367 21.0% 193,664 43.1% December 70,155 107.3% 67,243 -4.2% 103,975 54.6% 115,084 10.7% 163,871 42.4% January 106,541 57.3% 95,687 -10.2% 140,362 46.7% 198,873 41.7% 266,437 34.0% February 57,839 47.0% 68,015 17.6% 95,269 40.1% 125,671 31.9% 168,914 34.4% March 59,378 34.4% 56,600 -4.7% 103,163 82.3% 104,733 1.5% 160,147 52.9% April 87,438 27.3% 88,212 0.9% 137,030 55.3% 182,384 33.1% 215,299 18.0% May 58,291 6.7% 81,109 39.1% 109,371 34.8% 152,577 39.5% 217,760 42.7% *first month of 1/2 cent sales tax June 59,577 14.5% 83,253 39.7% 112,317 34.9% 171,813 53.0% 200,233 16.5% July 94,157 16.9% 135,187 43.6% 179,803 33.0% 223,854 24.5% 274,072 22.4% August 58,980 22.1% 109,584 85.8% 132,367 20.8% 184,851 39.7% 0 -100.0% September 75.228 38.3% 106.563 41.7% 122.445 14.9% 173.917 42.0% 0 -100.0% TOTAL $877,615 37.8% $1,033,502 17.8% $1,476,708 42.9% $1,931,017 30.8% $2,097,561 33.4% Thow SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1997-98 collected budget balance Dudget to date balance geiggi.ti 11.357.500 $1,048.782 $308,718 22.74% FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc MONTH 93/94 -Dec 94/95 -Dec 95/96 -Dec 96-97 -Dec 97-98 -Dec October $0 n/a $44,975 n/a $64,344 43.1% $80,946 25.8% $118,582 46.5% November 0 n/a 26,049 n/a 55,958 114.8% 67,684 21.0% 96,832 43.1% December 0 n/a 33,622 n/a 51,987 54.6% 57,542 10.7% 81,935 42.4% January 0 n/a 47,843 n/a 70,181 46.7% 99,437 41.7% 133,219 34.0% February 0 n/a 34,007 n/a 47,635 40.1% 62,836 31.9% 84,457 34.4% March 0 n/a 28,300 n/a 51,581 82.3% 52,366 1.5% 80,074 52.9% April 0 n/a 44,106 n/a 68,515 55.3% 91,192 33.1% 107,650 18.0% May 29,145 n/a 40,554 39.1% 54,686 34.8% 76,289 39.5% 108,880 42.7% June 29,788 n/a 41,627 39.7% 56,159 34.9% 85,906 53.0% 100,117 16.5% July 47,079 n/a 67,593 43.6% 89,901 33.0% 111,927 24.5% 137,036 22.4% /Le29,490 n/a 54,792 85.8% 66,184 20.8% 92,426 39.7% 0 -100.0% r 37 90 n/a 53.282 41.7% 61.223 14.9% 86.958 42.0% 0 -100.0% TOTAL $173,116 n/a $516,751 198.5% $738,354 42.9% $965,508 30.8% $1,048,7R2 33.4% 8/13/98 SLSTX98.XLS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Sales Tax Analysis FY1997-98 kg,' Actual Budget Actual Estimated (budget eat.) 1996-97 1997-98 1997-98 1997-98 Difference Chanae October 161,892 211,176 237,164 237,164 25,988 12.31% November 135,367 180,672 193,664 193,664 12,992 7.19% December 115,084 157,347 163,871 163,871 6,524 4.15% January 198,873 253,704 266,437 266,437 12,733 5.02% February 125,671 169,522 168,914 168,914 (608) -0.36% March 104,733 145,443 160,147 160,147 14,704 10.11% April 182,384 234,742 215,299 215,299 (19,443) -8.28% May 152,577 200,464 217,760 217,760 17,296 8.63% June 171,813 222,585 200,233 200,233 (22,352) -10.04% July 223,854 282,432 274,072 274,072 (8,360) -2.96% August 184,851 333,186 0 333,186 0 0.00% September 173,917 323.729 Q 323,729 0 0.00% 1,931,016 2,715,000 2,097,561 2,754,476 39,476 1.45% 40.60% 42.64% Southlake Parks Development Corporation 1/2 cent sales tax Actual Budget Actual Estimated (budget-est.) % 1996-97 1997-98 1997-98 1997-98 Difference Chanae October 80,946 105,588 118,582 118,582 12,994 12.31% November 67,684 90,336 96,832 96,832 6,496 7.19% • December 57,542 78,673 81,935 81,935 3,262 4.15% January 99,437 126,852 133,219 133,219 6,367 5.02% February 62,836 84,761 84,457 84,457 (304) -0.36% March 52,367 72,721 80,074 80,074 7,352 10.11% April 91,192 117,371 107,650 107,650 (9,721) -8.28% M - 76,289 100,232 108,880 108,880 8,648 8.63% J 85,907 111,292 100,117 100,117 (11,176) -10.04% 111,927 141,216 137,036 137,036 (4,180) -2.96% A 92,426 166,593 0 166,593 0 0.00% September 86.959 161,864 0 161,864 0 0.00% 965,508 1,357,500 1,048,781 1,377,238 19,738 1.45% 40.60% 42.64% L 8/13/98 SLSTX98.XLS City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, Deputy Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Town Square Status Report Town Square Progress continues on the infrastructure and commercial elements of this project. Parking lot paving on the west lot has been completed and is approximately 75% complete on the east lot. Street paving is scheduled to begin mid-August. Lime stabilization of Central Avenue has begun. Six buildings are currently under construction. Buildings 1A, 1B, 4C, 5A and 5B have had steel erected, and building 2C has had the slab poured. Brick has been delivered for buildings IA and 1B and brick installation has begun on 1A. The brick for Corner Bakery is (owe approximately 98% complete. The exterior sheathing for building lA is complete; electrical, mechanical and plumbing rough-in is complete; interior framing and sheetrock in the public areas and between tenant spaces is being constructed. The exterior stucco system has been completed on building IA (with the exception of one storefront). Windows have been delivered for building 1A. Brick work has begun on building 1B. Interior framing of Building 1B is being constructed; electrical, mechanical and plumbing rough-in is being installed. 1B roof construction is scheduled for the week of August 17. Brick work on the north and east faces has begun on 1B. Bldg 5B has had rough-in mechanical and plumbing begun. Town Hall On August 13, the CISD School Board officially chose not to participate in Town Hall. Based upon this information, Urban Architecture was instructed to complete the programming book based upon the inclusion of a City Library in the Town Hall. On the agenda for August 18 will be a request to select David Schwarz Associates and Urban Architecture to provide design services for Town Hall. If these choices are approved staff will plan on bringing detailed contracts back to Council at the first meeting in September. ( ;)11 RJH/rjh d:\w d-files\sts\stat5.doc City of Southlake,Texas I4 (kr MEMORANDUM August 13, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Tarrant County Tax Collection Contract Since 1982, the Tarrant County Tax Assessor/Collector has collected property taxes for the City of Southlake. The renewal contract has been presented to the City for collection of 1998 taxes, for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1998. Tarrant County charges $.40 per financial transaction, defined as a payment or refund on an account. This is the same per transaction fee as the previous year, and is a very reasonable charge for the service provided. Southlake would spend far in excess of the $3,800 budgeted for this service in personnel costs alone if we collected our own taxes. The working relationship with the Tarrant County tax office has been excellent, and they are responsive to our requests for information. The contract provides for disbursements to be made to the City when daily collections exceed $100, or at the close of a month. Also included in the contract is a listing of the reports provided to the City. There are provisions that allow the City to perform an audit of the County's collection process if we choose to do so. It should also be noted that Tarrant County plans to place tax data on the Internet in the Fall of 1998, which will be very beneficial to the Finance and Community Development offices as well as the citizens. Tarrant County has asked that this renewal contract be returned to them by Friday, September 4, 1998. Please place the renewal contract on the City Council's August 18, 1998 agenda for approval. LAH ,513 -/ z-. * • ?e, n: LE GARRISON Tax.assessor-Coilector :S a P. HAMRICK TARRANT COUNTY Chtet Deputy FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76196-0301 June 2, 1998 Ms. Lou _inn Heath Director of Finance City of Southlake 1725 E Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Ms. Heath: Please find enclosed two original Contracts for the assessment and collection of your ad valorem taxes by Tarrant County. Please return both signed Contracts by Friday, September 4, 1998, so that all necessary action may be completed before October 1, 1998. I will mail a fully executed Contract to you after Commissioner's Court has made (kire formal approval of the Contract. Please note in SECTION V of the Contract that your 1998 tax rate is due in my office by 2 p.m., Thursday, September 17, 1998. We ask that you schedule your budget and/or tax meetings in a manner that will allow you to set your tax rate on or before that date. ry-Ve plan to place tax data on the Internet in the Fall of 1998 as part of a project to make public information more accessible. Your unit's tax data will be part of this display. This information will be available without cost and should be valuable to your staff and citizens alike. Thank you for your cooperation. if you have any questions contact George Nobles at 884- 1123 or me at 884-1106. Sincerely. June Garrison Tax Asses:;or-Collector Tarrant County JG/cls Ly, Enclosures s�-a STATE OF TEXAS X �..r X AGREEMENT COUNTY OF TARRANT X Agreement made this day of , 1998, by and between June Garrison, Tarrant County Tax Assessor-Collector, and Tarrant County, hereinafter referred to as ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR, whose address is 100 E. Weatherford Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0301, and the City of Southlake hereinafter referred to as CITY,whose address is 1725 East Southlake Boulevard,Southlake,76092. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT The purpose of this Agreement is to state the terms and conditions under which the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR will provide assessment and collection services of Ad Valorem taxes levied by the CITY. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR agrees to collect the taxes due and owing on taxable property upon which the CITY has imposed said taxes. The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR shall PERFORM THE SAID SERVICES IN THE SAME MANNER AND FASHION AS TARRANT COUNTY COLLECTS ITS OWN TAXES due and owing on taxable property situated within its boundaries. The services performed shall include, but not be limited to: receiving information from the Tarrant Appraisal District for purposes of the Certified Appraisal Roll, and monthly changes thereto; providing mortgage companies, property owners and tax representatives, tax roll and payment data; providing all necessary assessments of taxes and Truth in Taxation calculations as required; the transmittal of tax statements via the U.S. Mail or electronic transfer of data; and rapid deposit payment processing. All CITY disbursements, made by check or by electronic transfer (wire), for collected tax accounts will be made to the CITY on the day the County Depository Bank indicates the mandatory assigned "float" period has elapsed and the funds are posted to the collected balance. If any daily collection total is less than one hundred dollars ($100.00), the disbursement will be withheld until the cumulative total of taxes collected for the CITY equals one hundred dollars (S100.00), or at the close of the month. ji3- 3 II. REPORTS The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR will provide the CITY the following reports, if requested: Daily: General Ledger Distribution Report Weekly: Detail Collection Report(Summary) Monthly: Tax Roll Summary (Totals Only) Month End Report Detail Collection Report(Summary) General Ledger Revenue & Expense Report Agriculture Rollback Collection Report Delinquent Tax Attorney Tape (Exhibit A) Annual: Paid Tax Roll Delinquent Tax Roll Current Tax Roll Other requested reports that require programming: S 25.00 per hour Other reports requiring computer run-time: S350.00 per hour III. AUDITS The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR will provide to the CITY auditor necessary explanation of all reports and access to ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR in-house tax system computer terminals to assist the CITY auditor in verifying their audit samples of the financial data previously provided by the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR during the past audit period. If the CITY elects to have their auditors conduct a "computer system assurance review audit" requiring assistance from ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR system's programmers and accountants, the fee is S660.00 per day, which will be deducted from the CITY'S current collections at the end of the month. Page 2 of 6 IV. COMPENSATION In consideration of the services to be performed by the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR, compensation for the services rendered will be a rate of forty cents (5.40) per financial transaction. A financial transaction is defined as when a CITY account is credited with a payment or debited for a refund. V. TAX RATE REQUIREMENT The CITY will provide the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR, in writing, their newly adopted tax rate and exemption schedule to be applied for assessing purposes no later than 2:00 p.m., Thursday, September 17, 1998. Under authority of Section 31.01 (h) of the Property Tax Code, any additional cost of printing and mailing tax statements because of late reporting of the tax rate or the exemption schedule will be charged to the CITY. If the CITY wishes their collection reports to be broken out as to maintenance and operation fund and interest and sinking fund, then the notice advising of the new tax rate must set out the separate rates, as well as the total rate. The tax rate and the exemption schedule for each of the last five (5) years in which an ad valorem tax was levied, or all prior years where there remains delinquent tax, must be furnished in writing to the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR. VI. TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall become effective as of the date hereinabove set out, and shall continue in effect during the 1998 tax year, unless sooner terminated by providing sixty (60) day written notice, as outlined in paragraph XI. VII. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES, ORDINANCES,AND REGULATIONS In performing the services required under this Agreement, the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR shall comply with all applicable federal and state statutes, case law, opinions of the Texas State Attorney General, Court orders and Comptroller regulations. If such compliance is impossible for reasons beyond its control, the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR shall immediately notify the CITY of that fact and the reasons therefor. Page 3 of 6 • VIII. DEPOSIT OF FUNDS All funds collected by the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR in the performance of the services stated herein for the CITY shall be promptly transferred to the account of the CITY at their depository bank. Electronically transferred funds incur an additional fee which will be charged back to the CITY and deducted from those collected funds. If the CITY desires their tax disbursements to be made by electronic transference of funds (wire) the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR assumes no liability for the funds after initiation of the electronic transference of the CITY'S funds from the County Depository to the CITY'S designated depository. IX. REFUNDS Refunds will be made by the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR. The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR will advise the CITY of changes in the tax roll which were mandated by the Tarrant Appraisal District. The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR will not be responsible for refunds on prior year paid accounts unless the prior year paid accounts for the past five (5) years are provided to the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR via computer magnetic tape in the exact computer layout as set out in Exhibit "B". All refunds of overpayments or erroneous payments due, but not requested, and as described in Section 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code, will after three years from the date of payment, be proportionately disbursed to those entities contracting with the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR. The contract must have been in force, actual assessment and collection functions begun and the tax account was at the time of the over or erroneous payment within the CITY'S jurisdiction. The proportional share is based upon the CITY'S percent of the tax account's total levy assessed at the time of receipting the over or erroneous payment. X. DELINQUENT COLLECTIONS The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR will assess and collect the fifteen percent (15%) collection fee pursuant to Sections 33.07 and 33.48 of the Property Tax Code, when allowed. The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR will disburse the amount directly to the CITY for compensation to a Firm under contract to the CITY. Page 4 of 6 If the delinquent collection Attorney contracted by the CITY requires attendance of Tax ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR personnel at a court other than the District Courts in downtown Fort Worth, and the county is not a party, the employee's expenses and proportionate salary will be the responsibility of the CITY and will be added to the collection expenses and charged to the CITY. The ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR will not be responsible for the collection of prior year delinquent accounts unless all delinquent accounts information is provided to the ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR via computer magnetic tape in the exact computer layout as set out in Exhibit "B". XI. NOTICES Any notices to be given hereunder by either party to the other may be effected, in writing, either by personal delivery or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested. Mailed notices shall be addressed to the address of the parties as they appear in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement, but each party may change this address by written notice in accordance with this paragraph. XII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS This instrument and the attachments hereto contain the entire Agreement between the parties relating to the rights herein granted and obligations herein assumed. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this instrument shall be of no force or effect except a subsequent modification in writing and signed by the parties. This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Tarrant County,Texas. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives and successors. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or enforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid,illegal,or unenforceable provisions had never been contained. This Agreement and the attachments hereto constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the parties respecting the within subject matter. Page 5 of 6 5/6- 7 Executed on the day and year first above written,Tarrant County,Texas. BY: NNE GARRISON DATE TAX ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR TARRANT COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: BY: DATE TITLE: FOR TARRANT COUNTY: BY: TOM VANDERGRIFF DATE TARRANT COUNTY JUDGE Page 6 of 6 5/6-8 EXHIBIT A TARRANT COUNTY TAX OFFICE NAME: DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS - MASTER FILE RECORD LAYOUT: DESCRIPTION COBOL PICTURE ACCOUNT.NUMBER PIC X(11). ROLL CODE PIC X(01). OWNER NAME 1 PIC X(30). OWNER NAME 2 PIC X(30). ADDRESS LINE 1 PIC X(30). ADDRESS LINE 2 PIC X(30). CITY PIC X(20). STATE PIC X(02). ZIP PIC 9(09). FILLER PIC X(02). LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 PIC X(30). LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 PIC X(30). LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 PIC X(30). LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 PIC X(30). ACRES PIC 9(11). STREET NAME PIC X(13). STREET NUMBER PIC 9(07). PIDN PIC X(30). FIDUCIARY (Y OR N) PIC X(01). FILLER PIC X(02). TAD EXEMPTION CODE PIC X(03). FILLER PIC X(01). ENTITY CODES PIC X(45). NON BILL CODE PIC X(15). SPTB PIC X(03). OVER 65 QUARTERLY PAYMENT (Y OR N) PIC X(01). HALF PAYMENT (Y OR N) PIC X(01). INSTALLMENT AGREEMENT DATE PIC 9(06). FILLER PIC X(15). TAPE FORMAT: ASCII LABELED DENSITY: 9 TRACK 6250 OR 1600.BPI RECORD SIZE: 444 BYTES BLOCK SIZE: 13320 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A (CONTINUED) TARRANT COUNTY TAX OFFICE NAME: DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS - RECEIVABLE FILE RECORD LAYOUT: DESCRIPTION COBOL PICTURE ACCOUNT NUMBER PIC X(11) TAX YEAR PIC 9(02) TAX UNIT PIC 9(03) FIDUCIARY (Y OR N) PIC X(01) HALF PAYMENT (Y OR N) PIC X(01) OVER 65 QUARTERLY PAYMENT (Y OR N) PIC X(01) INSTALLMENT AGREEMENT PIC X(01) DELINQUENCY DATE PIC 9(06) YYMti1DD 3307 DATE PIC 9(06) YYMMDD BASE LEVY PIC 9(09)V99 BALANCE DUE PIC 9(09)V99 JUDGEMENT DATE PIC 9(06) YYMMDD SUIT NUMBER PIC X(15) SUIT FILE DATE PIC 9(06) YYMMDD BANKRUPTCY NUMBER PIC X(15) BANKRUPTCY FILE DATE PIC 9(06) YYKMDD FILLER PIC X(08) TAPE FORMAT: ASCII LABELED DENSITY: 9 TRACK 6250 OR 1600 BPI RECORD SIZE: 110 BYTES BLOCK SIZE: 16500 Page 2 of 2 56 /o `�.. EXHIBIT B TARRANT COUNTY TAX OFFICE NAME: DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS - MASTER FILE RECORD LAYOUT: DESCRIPTION COBOL PICTURE ACCOUNT NUMBER PIC X(11). PIDN PIC X(30). PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 PIC X(30). PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 PIC X(30). PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 PIC X(30). PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 PIC X(30). OWNER NAME 1 PIC X(30). OWNER NAME 2 PIC X(30). OWNER ADDRESS PIC X(30). OWNER CITY PIC X(20). OWNER STATE PIC X(02). OWNER ZIP PIC 9(09). TAPE FORMAT: ASCII UNLABELED DENSITY: 9 TRACK 6250 OR 1600 BPI RECORD SIZE: 282 BYTES BLOCK SIZE: 14100 Page 1 of 4 EXrIIBIT B (CONTINUED) TARRANT COUNTY TAX OFFICE NAME: DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS - RECEIVABLE RECORD RECORD LAYOUT: DESCRIPTION COBOL PICTURE ACCOUNT NUMBER PIC X(11). TAX YEAR PIC 9(02). TAX UNIT PIC 9(03). CITY, ISD, CED TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE PIC 9(11). LAND VALUE PIC 9(11). IMPROVEMENT VALUE PIC 9(11). AGRICULTURAL EXCLUSION PIC 9(11). DEFERRED AMOUNT HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION PIC 9(11). OVER 65 EXEMPTION PIC 9(11). DISABILITY EXEMPTION PIC 9(11). VETERAN EXEMPTION PIC 9(11). PRORATED VALUE PIC 9(11). FREEPORT EXEMPTION PIC 9(11). TAX ABATEMENT PIC 9(11). SOLAR EXEMPTION PIC 9(11). HISTORIC EXEMPTION PIC 9(11). �.•- TAXABLE VALUE PIC 9(11). BASE LEVY PIC 9(09)V99. LEVY/BALANCE DUE PIC 9(09)V99. LEVY PAID PIC 9(09)V99. TOTAL PAID PIC 9(09)V99. (INCL. BASE LEVY, P&I, ATTY FEES, COURT COSTS AND ABSTRACT FEES) LEVY REFUND DUE PIC 9(09)V99. REFUND DUE DATE PIC 9(06). YYMMDD FROZEN YEAR PIC 9(02). • FROZEN AMOUNT PIC 9(09)V99. DELINQUENCY DATE PIC 9(06). YYMMDD 3307 DATE PIC 9(06). YYMMDD AG TYPE PIC 9(01). FULLY EXEMPT FLAG PIC X(01). Y/N PAYMENT TYPE PIC X(01). (INCL. S - SPLIT PAYMENT, Q - QUARTERLY PAYMENT, P - PARTIAL PAYMENT) SUIT NUMBER PIC X(15). BANKRUPTCY NUMBER PIC X(15). COURT COSTS DUE PIC 9(06)V99. ABSTRACT FEES DUE PIC 9(06)V99. FILLER PIC X(05). TAPE FORMAT: ASCII UNLABELED DENSITY: 9 TRACK 6250 OR 1600 BPI RECORD SIZE: 310 BYTES BLOCK SIZE: 15500 Page 2 of 4 EXHIBIT B (CONTNUED) TARRANT COUNTY TAX OFFICE NAME: DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS: PAYMENT TRANSACTION RECORD RECORD LAYOUT: DESCRIPTION COBOL PICTURE ACCOUNT NUMBER PIC X(11). TAX YEAR PIC 9(02). TAX UNIT PIC 9(03). CITY, ISD, CED DEPOSIT NUMBER PIC 9(10). CHECK NUMBER PIC X(15). RECEIPT NUMBER FOR PAYMENT PIC X(08). PAYMENT DATE PIC 9(06). YYMMDD PAYMENT TYPE PIC X(01). (INCL. S - SPLIT PAYMENT, Q - QUARTERLY PAYMENT, P - PARTIAL PAYMENT) TOTAL AMOUNT PAID PIC 9(09)V99. (INCL. BASE LEVY, P&I, ATTY FEES, COURT COSTS AND ABSTRACT FEES) BASE LEVY PAID PIC 9(09)V99. P&I PAID PIC 9(09)V99. ATTORNEY FEES PAID PIC 9(09)V99. COURT COSTS PAID PIC 9(09)V99. ABSTRACT FEES PAID PIC 9(09)V99. REFUNDS PAID TO CUSTOMER PIC 9(09)V99. \km, DATE REFUNDS MADE TO CUSTOMER PIC 9(06). YYMMDD FILLER PIC X(01). TAPE FORMAT: ASCII UNLABELED DENSITY: 9 TRACK 6250 OR 1600 BPI RECORD SIZE: 140 BYTES BLOCK SIZE: 7000 Page 3 of 4 NOTES: 1) Account numbers are right-justified and padded with leading zeroes. 2) PIDNs are left justified and padded with tailing blanks. 3) Suit numbers and bankruptcy numbers are left justified and padded with tailing blanks. 4) All alphanumeric fields are left justified and padded with trailing blanks. All numeric fields are right- justified and padded with leading zeroes. All alphanumeric fields are filled with blanks and all numeric fields with zeroes, if not available. 5) The RECEIVABLE RECORD file includes delinquent accounts, refunds due, and five (5) years history (prior to the current year) of accounts paid in full. 6) If a levy refund is due for an account, the refund should be placed in the LEVY REFUND DUE field in the RECEIVABLE RECORD. 7) The PAYMENT TRANSACTION RECORD file includes five (5) years of history. 3) The PAYMENT TRANSACTION RECORD includes three (3) different types of payments: a) court costs and abstract fees b) levy, P&I and attorney fees, and c) refunds made to customers. • Page 4 of 4 City of Southlake,Texas I 1 I thwe MEMORANDUM August 13, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, Deputy Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Selection of David Schwarz Associates and Urban Architecture to provide design services for Town Hall Staff has been working with Urban Architecture for several months in order to develop the space planning and programming of Town Hall. It has been staffs intention to recommend to City Council that David Schwarz Associates and Urban Architecture would provide the architectural design services for this building. Both of these firms have been involved in the design and development of Town Square. They will bring to the Town Hall project a continuity of design philosophy which will result in the design of a Town Hall that looks like a part of the overall development. In order to insure that we are continuing in the right direction we would like City Council to officially recognize and select these two firms to provide these architectural design services. LSchwarz would fill the role as Design Architect and would be responsible for the schematic design and design development. He would be responsible for the overall exterior appearance of the building and the design of the public areas. In addition he would maintain some involvement in the review and approval of shop drawings related to the building aesthetics. Urban would fill the role as Architect of Record and would be responsible for the construction drawing and construction administration of the project. They would be responsible for the preparation of all construction plans, bid documents, and construction period related issues. Over the next two weeks we will be refining the scope of services for each of the firms and completing (with the assistance of our attorneys) the contract documents. At that time we will also be able to bring the proposed fee structure to Council for approval. Once we have the contracts in place, it is anticipated that schematic design and design development will take 6 - 8 months. Since we intended to use a staged construction method of construction we will begin excavation and foundation work within this period. We intend on meeting the March 29, 1999 goal of laying the building cornerstone, with occupancy of the building to occur in late u r-early fall 2000. RJH/r. • City of Southlake,Texas ,I II MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Freese and Nichols for the design of modifications to the Keller/Southlake pump station and design of the 30"/36" portion of the Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water System (NETCRWS) Background The Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water System (NETCRWS) is an association of cities in this region of Tarrant County. The goal of the member entities is to provide for a reliable water supply and distibution system that serves the needs of the individual members, that requires the costs of the system to be allocated based on the efficient use of the system and that minimizes the administration complexities and the opportunity _for dispute. The cities that are members of NETCRWS include Southlake, Keller, Roanoke, Trophy Club, and Westlake. Attached is a proposal for the design of a 30/36-inch transmission line and modifications to the Keller/Southlake Pump Station. This proposed line is the easternmost, north-south portion of the Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water System (NETCRWS). The line is proposed to extend from pump station no. 1 at Pearson and F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 and the ground storage tank on T.W. King. The goal of this line, along with the proposed 24-inch line extending through Trophy Club, is to ensure a redundant supply of water to the City. Should a water supply main break, there will be an additional feed to maintain service. The pipeline and the modifications to the pump station will provide an additional 10 million gallons of water per day to the NETCRWS members. The cost of this proposal is $420,786, which includes $92.018 for pump station modifications and $328,768 for the 30/36-inch pipeline. The City will pay the initial cost of the line at this time. The CIP budget includes a total of $3,733,516 over three years beginning next fiscal year. Due to the water emergency this summer, funds are proposed to be reallocated to begin the project this year to increase the City's capacity sooner. Ultimately, some of these costs will be reimbursed by other NETCRWS member cities and the maintenance of the line will be taken over by the City of Ft. (re Worth. 5D-1 , Lir' The tasks in the agreement include the preliminary and ultimate designs of the pump station improvements, the preliminary and ultimate designs of the water transmission line, surveying, bidding, and some involvement in the construction process. Recommendation Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Freese and Nichols for the design of the 30/36-inch portion of the Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water System. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre Attachment: Professional Services Agreement L (kr, 5 D-2 A CENTURY OF SERVICE .f 1djag FREESE•NICHOLS August 13, 1998 Robert R. Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Whitehead: We are very pleased to have this opportunity to submit our proposal for engineering services for the modifications to the Keller/Southlake Pump Station and the 36" Water Transmission Line. Joining our team is Brittain & Crawford who will provide easement and design surveys. Our Project Manager for the work will be Thomas Haster, P.E. Thomas has extensive pump station and pipeline (we experience and works with several large water utility districts in the north Texas area. Attached is our detail scope of work. We are proposing two projects, one for the pump station and the other for the 36" water line. In each case we have included some initial time to re-address the water delivery concept and review of the planned transmission line route with the Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water users group and other appropriate officials. Our estimated not to exceed fee for all phases of the proposed work is $420,786. We estimate three months to complete the preliminary engineering phase and six months to complete construction documents. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 817-735-7285. We look forward to working with you and other members of the City of Southlake staff and again thank you for this opportunity. Sincerely, • Jerry L. Fleming, P.E. Principal xc: MLN TH File 1LF:A:'pslener.wpd Freese and Nichols. Inc. Engineers Environmental Scientists Architects 4055 International Plaza Suite: Fort Worth. Texas 76109-4895 817-735-7300 Metro 81 50_3-1900 Fax 817-735-7491 PROPOSAL TO CITY OF SOUTHLAKE KELLER/SOUTHLAKE PUMP STATION MODIFICATIONS AND 36" WATER TRANSVIISSION LINE AUGUST , 1998 SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES Freese and Nichols, Inc (FNI) presents this proposal for engineering services associated with the planned improvements associated with the Keller/Southlake Pump Station system and the 36" pipeline that will complete the water transmission supply loop for northeast Tarrant County. These improvements are the results of prior engineering studies completed by FNI. TASK I-Preliminary Design Report for Keller/Southlake Pump Station Modifications 1. We will review water supply demands and proposed system operations for the Northeast Tarrant County Region Water(NETCRW) users. This effort will reconfirm anticipated supply demands with the users. A maximum of two (2) meetings will be held to review and confirm these data as well as confirming the planned system improvements. Attendees of these two meetings should include representative of the Cities of Southlake, Keller, Westlake,Fort Worth and other potential users. A demand/distribution study is not included in this effort. 2. Pump station and piping modification will be evaluated based upon the results from Item 1. FNI will: a. Evaluate and identify pump operational requirements to meet the required system head and flow requirements b. Determine additional valving requirements c. Identify pipe system site layout and pipe sizes d. Evaluation of individual or system flow meters is not included e. Meet with the Cities of Southlake and Fort Worth to coordinate these improvements and to define design standards. A maximum of three (3) coordination meetings will be held. L st�—a 3. Identify SCADA requirements to transfer Keller/Southlake Pump Station to City of Fort Worth Northside II Pressure Plane to supply flow to the City of Southlake South and North Pump Stations. A maximum of two(2)meetings will be held to coordinate and define the SCADA requirements. No additional SCADA coordination or design is included in this proposal. 4. Prepare preliminary estimates of probable construction cost. 5. Prepare a preliminary engineering report and submit to the City of Southlake. Ten(10)copies of the report will be submitted. One(1)meeting will be held to review the report with the city. TASK II - Design of Keller/Southlake Pump Station Improvements 1. Prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the improvements identified in Task I, Preliminary Engineering Report. Contract documents are anticipated to include the following: a. Connection to provide gravity flow from the Caylor tank to the existing Keller/Southlake supply line b. Approximately 3,000 feet of 36" piping connecting the Northside II Pressure Plane to the pump station c. Motor operated valve at pump station site to allow gravity flow from Caylor Tank to Southlake South Pump Station d. Increased pump capacity at the Keller/Southlake Pump Station e. Pressure transmitter vault at pipeline high level point to provide secondary control of Keller/Southlake Pump Station. 2. A maximum of three(3)coordination meetings will be held to coordinate the design with city officials. 3. Plan and specification development will be in accordance with the following: 60 % Review Plans/specifications outline/construction estimate 90 % Review Plans/specifications/updated construction estimate 100 % Review Plans/specifications/updated construction estimate Final documents Plans/specifications/construction estimate One (1) meeting is included for each review session. Eight (8) sets of half size blue line drawings will be submitted for each review. Final deliverables 5D-5 shall include one (1) full size reproducible set of drawings and twenty full size blueline drawings and specifications. Additional printing, if required. shall be billed at the standard FNI rate for reproduction. 4. Development of drawings will utilize standard City of Fort Worth(CFW)and FNI details as applicable. Specifications will utilize North Central Texas Council of Governments front end documents and FNI/CFW technical specifications. TASK III - Preliminary Engineering Report for 36" Water Transmission Line A maximum of four (4) meetings will be held with NETCRW, TxDOT, CFW, Tarrant County, developers and utility company officials to coordinate and reconfirm the planned route of the 36"transmission line. New route studies are not included in this proposal; rather, these meetings will focus on confirmation of the general route and issues that should be considered during final route establishment. 2. Utilizing surveyed data, the proposed pipeline route will be identified. Coordination meetings ( 6 maximum) will be held with officials to discuss the alignment and coordinate design issues that may define either horizontal or vertical alignment. 3. Impact to existing utilities, streets, driveways and traffic will be evaluated. 4. FNI will conduct an environmental impact assessment to identify environmental issues along the pipeline route. The investigation will consist of a field reconnaissance and correspondence with the Texas Historical Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Corps of Engineers. Results of our investigation will be described in a letter report to the City indicating any concerns identified regarding fish and wildlife or cultural resources. The report will also include a recommended approach for Corps of Engineers' 404 permitting. The proposed pipeline will require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit for stream crossing along the route. The following items could be provided as additional services if required: a. Cultural resources field survey. b. Preparation of a pre-construction notification or individual permit application for a Corps of Engineers' 404 permit. 5. Prepare a preliminary engineering report identifying the pipeline alignment, discuss impact issues and an estimate of probable construction cost. Ten(10) copies of this report will be submitted to the City of Southlake. One (1) (law meeting will be held to review the report with the city. Major alignment 50-6 (lire adjustments requiring new site evaluation and/or surveys will be considered as an additional service. TASK IV - Design of 36" Water Transmission Line Prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the 36" water transmission line identified in Task III. Contract documents are anticipated to include the following: a. Plan and profile alignment for the pipeline route b. Typical drawings for the adjustment of municipal utilities such as water and sanitary sewer lines. Commercial utility adjustments are assumed to be the responsibility of the utility company. c. Replacement of pavement to match existing street for Pearson Lane and Florence Road. d. Standard FNI/City of Fort Worth details utilized as applicable (hoe e. No traffic control plans are included. 2. A maximum of four (4) coordination meetings will be held to coordinate the design with officials. 3. Plan and specification development will be in accordance with the following: 60 % Review Plans/specifications outline/construction estimate 90 % Review Plans/specifications/updated construction estimate 100 % Review Plans/specifications/updated construction estimate Final documents Plans/specifications/construction estimate One (1) meeting is included for each review session. Eight (8) sets of half size drawings will be submitted for each review. Final deliverables shall consist of one (1) full size set of reproducible drawings and twenty (20) sets of full size blueline drawings and specifications. Additional printing, if required, shall be billed at the standard FNI reproduction rate. 4. Development of drawings will utilize CFW and FNI details as applicable. Specifications will utilize North Central Texas Council of Governments front end documents and CFW technical specifications. (iimr 5D-7 TASK V - Survey 1. Provide design survey for the pump station area modifications and pipeline route. Pipeline alignment and topographic data will be provided. Surveys will include property boundaries,one(1')foot topographic contours,roadway surfaces, utilities, other features needed for design and establishment of monumentation for construction. 2. Provide easements and accompanying exhibits required for easement acquisition. Cost for actual number of easements prepared will be based upon the following: One easement per parcel $500.00 One easement per parcel with temporary construction easement $600.00 Included in FNI fee are ten (10) easements with temporary construction easements. Depending upon the actual number of easements required,the fee shall be adjusted accordingly. (kor TASK VI - Bidding 1. Assist OWNER in securing bids, issuing notice to bidders and notifying construction news publications. The notice to bidders will be furnished to OWNER for publication in the local news media. The cost for publications shall be paid by OWNER. 2. Assist OWNER in the opening, tabulation, and analysis of the bids received and furnish recommendations on the award of contracts or the appropriate actions to be taken by OWNER. 3. Assist OWNER in the preparation of contract documents for construction contracts. TASK VII - Construction 1. Assist OWNER in conducting one (1) pre-construction conference for each project with the Contractor(s). Review construction schedules prepared by the Contractor(s) pursuant to the requirements of the construction contract, and prepare a proposed estimate of monthly cash requirements of the Project. Live 2. Field visits to observe progress and quality of construction work and review 5D-8 of contractor submittals are not included in this scope of work. If these services are required, they shall be considered as an additional service. 3. Conduct, in company with OWNER's representative, a final review of the Project for conformance with the design concept of the Project and general compliance with the Contract Documents, and review and comment on the certificate of completion and the recommendation for final payment to the Contractor(s). 4. Prepare one(1)set of reproducible Record Drawings based upon information provided by the City of Southlake. SCHEDULE We estimate completion of contract documents (plans and specifications) for advertisement will be within six (6) months from notice to proceed. Completion of the preliminary engineering phase should be complete within three (3) months unless unusual circumstances arise. (Ire FEE FNI's estimated not to exceed fee for these services is summarized as follows. Attached are task/man-hour summary sheets for the two projects. Keller/Southiake Pump Station Modifications $ 92,018.00 36" Water Transmission Line $328,768.00 Total $420,786.00 L 50.g • KELLER/SOUTHLAKE PUMP STATION TASK/MAN-HOUR SUMMARY LATE: July 1998 PIC 1 PM CE 1 Elec. i CE WORD TOTAL SEN ENG : DES ENG I i TECH I PROC 1 i j HOURLY RATE S1361 S95 S75 I S1081 568 S40 I ! 1 A. PRELIM.ENGR.REPORT 1 1.Review Water Supply Demands 1 8 8 1 1I 2 18 Ia. Coord Meetings(2)Southlake 4 1 8 , 12 2. Evaluate pumping/site piping layout 6 22 8 10 4 50 2a. Coord Meetings(3)FW,/Southlake 21 12 6 1 20 3. Identify SCADA requirements 4 121 161 32 3a. Coord Meetings(2)FW/Southlake 1 4 8 1 8 I 20 4. Prepare Construction Cost Estimates 4 8 I 41 I 16 5. Prepare Preliminary Engin.Report i 4! 8 12 I 8 6. 8 ; 46 5a. Report Presentation Meeting(1) i 2 1 41 : 6 6.PM/QC 2 i 4 1 I 1 1 6 I I 0 18 I 66 1 62 50, 16 141 226 SUBTOTAL 52.448 i S6.2701 S4,650 S5,400 I S1,088, S560 1 S20,416 EXPENSES TRAVEL S 188.00 COMPUTER S162.00 Le-ADD S400 IIN'TING S 100.00 ENERAL S50.00 SUBTOTAL S900.00 PHASE A TOTAL S21,316 LP' Page 50-1° , i PIC PM I CE Dec CE 1 WORD . TOTAL SEN ENG DES ENG I TECH i PROC I 1 HOURLY RATE I S136 S95 S75 S108 S68 I S40 I , , B. DESIGN ' la. Drawings (9 sheets) j 4• 50 i 1501 60 160 424 lb. Specifications I 2 ' 30 I 50I 24 4; 24 134 is Final Cost Estimate I 4 8 I 4 ' 16 2. Design Coordination Meetings(3) 2 81 41 4' 18 3a. 60%Review Meeting(1) 4 4 I 4; 12 3b. 90%Review Meeting(1) 4 4' 8 3c. 100%Review Meeting(1) 4 - 4 4 12 3d. Final Documents 2 ' 8 ! 4: 8 22 4. PM,'QAiQC 4 6 ! 4 14 i I 20 I 106' 228 100 i 164 32 646 SUBTOTAL j S2.720; S10,070 S17,100[ 510,8C0: S11,152 $1,280 S53,122 EXPENSES Travel S178.00 Computer S 120.00 CADD S2,500 Printing S500.00 General S50.00 _(_..., SUBTOTAL $3,348.00 PHASE B TOTAL $56,470 L Page 5p-11 • I PIC j PM 1 CE CS WORD TOTAL SEN ENG : DES ENGTECH ! PROC (11100'' HOURLY RATE S105 j S95 575 S57 538 I C. BIDDING 1. Advertisement/Coordination ' 10 j 6 1 16 2. Issue Addenda f 4!. I I 4! 2 10 3. Bid Opening(1) 4 1 2; 6 4. Eval&Recommendations 1 1 4 2 i 7 6. PMIQC • 0 1 ' 22: 5 0 8' 2 39 SUBTOTAL. S105 ! S2.090 S450• S0 5456' 5"6' S3.177 EXPENSES TRAVELPER DIEM S24.CO PRINTING SO.CO GENERAL SO.00 SUBTOTAL 524.00 PHASE C TOTAL S3,201 PIC PM I CE Elec. CS WORD TOTAL (111.0'-- SEN ENG I DES ENG Eng. I TECH I PROC HOURLY RATE 5136 i S90 i 575 S68 S68 S40 1 I D. CONSTRUCTION PHASE I I 1. Pre—Construction Meeting(1) 4! i 4 8 2. Final Inspection (1) 6 6 12 8. Record Drawings 2 10 20 32 1 0', 12 . 10 6 20! 4 52 SUBTOTAL SO I S1.080 5750, 5408' S1.360! 5160! 53.758 EXPENSES Travel S43 Printing S400 General SUBTOTAL S4:8 PHASE D TOTAL S4,206 (kir Page 5D-12 1 PIC I PM CE CS CE j WORD TOTAL SEN ENG DES ENG TECH TECH PROC Loy HOURLY RATE S136 S90 S75'; S68 S68 S40 E. CLOSE—OUT PHASE 1 SUBTOTAL SO SO S0 SO( S0; SO S0 EXPENSES TRAVEL/PER DIEM PRINTING GENERAL SUBTOTAL S0.00 PHASE E TOTAL SO SUBTOTAL F& N S85,193 (kW SUBCONSULTANTS 1. SURVEY SUBCONSULTANT S6.825.00 2. GEOTECH SUBCONSULTANT S0.00 TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS S6,825 S6.825 TOTAL BASIC SERVICES FEE $92,018 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 1. PREPARE NEW ALP 2.PREPARE NEW EXHIBIT"A" SUBTOTAL SO TOTAL FEE $92,018 (PI Page 50-13 SOUTHLAKE 366 TRANSMISSION LINE TASK/MAN-HOUR SUMMARY LATE: July 1998 PIC PM ! CE En Sc CE I WORD • TOTAL SEN ENG ! DES ENG TECH I PROC ; HOURLY RATE S136 i S95 I S75 S105 S68 S40 A. PRELIM.ENGR.REPORT I I I 1. Field Investigation/Data Collection I 4 I 16 I 32 i I 52 1a. Coord Meetings(4) ! 16 I 32 I 161 64 2. Route Identifiction 4 I 16 I 24 I 40 84 2a. Route Coord Meetings(6) 241 48 24 I 96 3. Utility Impact Study 8 I 16 161 4. Envirionmental Eval. 4 I 24 I 5. Preliminary Report I 2 I 16 I 4 I 16 I 8 5a. Report Presentation Meeting(1) 4 I 6 I 2 6.PM/QC 2 I 8 I i I I 10 561 154 72 1 28 114 8I 432 SUBTOTAL S7,616I S14,630 S5,400 I S2,940I S7,752 I S3201 $38,658 EXPENSES TRAVEL S288.00 COMPUTER S192.00 CADD S480 (li- Q 1E.;G S100.00 iNERAL S50.00 SUBTOTAL S1,110.00 PHASE A TOTAL S39,768 L Page 5D-14 PIC PM CE Estimator I CE I WORD TOTAL SE`i ENG 1 DES ENG TECH I PROC HOURLY RATE S136 ' S95 S75 ' S68 I S68' S40 (Me ' 1 B. DESIGN la. Drawings(47sheets) 101 430! 700: 1130 I 2270 lb. Specifications 2 : 32 I 32 ( 4 24. 94 lc Cost Estimate II 2 I 8 ; 32 I ' 42 2. Design Coordination Meetings(4) 8 j 24 I 24 I I 56 3a. 60%Review Meeting(1) 4 I 6 I 8 ' 13 3b. 90%Review Meeting(1) 1 6 I 8 14 3c. 100%Review Meeting(1) 4 6 ! 8 i 18 3d. Final Documents 2 I 8 8 18 4. PMiQAIQC 16 ' 24 ! 24 . 64 I I 44 i 508 I 796 I 32 1134[ 32= 2530 SUBTOTAL ; S5,984 I S48,260 I S59,700 I S2,176, S77,112 S1,280 I S194,512 EXPENSES Travel S288.00 Computer S320.00 CARD S10,040 Printing S2,260.00 General S50.00 SUBTOTAL S 12,958.00 (br PHASE B TOTAL S207,470 L Page 5D-15 1 ' PIC PM CE ENG DES ENG CS WORD TOTAL EMIENG , TECH i PROC HOURLY RATE 5105 S95 S75 ! S57 S38 C. BIDDING 1. Advertisement/Coordination 2' 16 10 28 2. Issue Addenda 1 1 4 4 4 1 2 • 14 3. Bid Opening(1) 4 6 4 14 4. Eval&Recommendations 2 i 4 4; 4 ! 14 5. PM/QC I 1 I 0 i 1 i 8 30: 18 1 0 12 2 70 SUBTOTAL S840', S2,850 S1.350 SO' S684 S76. S5.8C0 EXPENSES TRAVEL/PER DIEM S24.00 PRINTING SO.00 GENERAL S0.00 SUBTOTAL S24.00 PHASE C TOTAL S5.824 PIC i PM i CE CE CS WORD TOTAL. Loy SEN ENG 1 DES ENG ; TECH TECH ! PROC 1 I HOURLY RATE 5136 1 S95 S75 i S68' S68 I S40 D. CONSTRUCTION PHASE I I 1. Pre—Construction Meeting(1) 6 6 i 4 16 2. Final Inspection (1) 8 8 4, 20 3. Record Drawings i 2 32 ! 48' 82 i , 0 16 • 46i 0 48i 8 ; 118 SUBTOTAL 1 SO S1.520; S 3,450 SO; S3,264 i S320', S8J54 EXPENSES Travel S48 Printing S450 General SUBTOTAL S498 PHASE D TOTAL S9,052 Lir Page 5 .-16 PIC PM CE CS CE WORD TOTAL (ilibre* ; SEN ENG DES ENG TECH TECH PROC HOURLY RATE 5136 S95 S75 S68 S63 S�O E. CLOSE—OUT PHASE SUBTOTAL SO: S0 SO': SO SOI SO SO EXPENSES TRAVEL PER DIEM PR1NTLti G GENERAL SUBTOTAL S0.00 PHASE E TOTAL SO SUBTOTAL F&N S262,114 (1111.10" SUBCONSULTANTS 1. SURVEY SUBCONSULTANT S66,654.00 2. GEOTECH SUBCONSULTANT S0.00 TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS S66,654 S66,654 TOTAL BASIC SERVICES FEE $328,768 ADDITIONAL SERVICES SUBTOTAL SO TOTAL FEE $328,768 (be. Page '5D-17 City of Southlake,Texas Ise MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Approval of fees for the Phase II portion of the professional services agreement with Freese and Nichols for the design of the West Jones Branch channel improvements Background In April 1998, Council approved a professional services agreement with Freese and Nichols for the design of channel improvements for W. Jones Branch creek. These improvements are necessary to help facilitate TxDOT's expansion of S.H. 114, particularly for the Kimball Interchange. Council approved $21,000 for the cost of the first phase (data collection, stream (Ire management alternates. meeting with Corps of Engineers) of the project in the original agreement. Article V (Page SC-7) stated that "fees for Phases II, III, and IV will be submitted to the OWNER for approval near the completion of Phase I." The costs will be presented separately as the entire scope of services are not known until the completion of each phase. Freese and Nichols have submitted a fee of $89,000 for the Phase II portion of the contract. The Phase II activities include developing preliminary plans, determining_ necessary easements, applying for a 404 permit (required by the Corps of Engineers for activities in "waters of the U.S."), final design, and bid procedures. The fee does not include surveying, which the City has contracted with Cheatham and Associates to complete. This project is proposed to be funded from the CIP budget. Should Council approve the proposed Stormwater Drainage Utility District (SDUS), the CIP budget would be reimbursed from the SDUS fund. Recommendation Staff recommends Council approve the fees for the Phase II portion of the professional (krawe- services agreement with Freese and Nichols for the design of the West Jones Branch 5E-1 channel improvements. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City ,.• Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. B W/cre Attachments: Contract Change Authorization Agreement for Professional Services L L 5E-2 AUG-12-1998 17:04 Freese 3: Nichols, :nc, 91' 735 7491 P,02-`03 rim ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE AUTHORIZATION FIes8SE•NueaocS 7 IP ' } -'' a 4" 3 8 44' 3 O,tliP . 1i 3 r 3 3,1 3 l 'tm� ,r F P• ..9 w.. 3 ai3V 7. /��, i 7.31 g 3 } 6. I }�'h i f 3 q7 ��ly �=i� �.. if ig iiEM: Wleldt: . f o i3,.Y1� !, 3Y li it i ,H ..g.��y� 333 13 •o4:0 ,I g _ra it 11 tf } f.}. },g l} (t fl }1 Sl t nl 19 �^ Gtitlrlelfta€� l 33i F 1 ! ig cj h,7 } !>�i�r 1. .�1 1't ctili T iirt 2 iI3 'f'� f 9 ......4 3}Cl ,i onfra�d1Rl . "Oject S 4014a'�. /1p.� �1t IE �..' g.J a �"'.1 rli,",hi!3 ti ,j.�A3'r1 n6, �, 1.� , � {' ,« } 44 A L'n" Sh Poe } 7 ; 11 7'01 I .Ii� ii1 `j iii i .1. }I iii }i ly'Ii� 3;;_;; 3 3 J i 3 I iial j :�,re1 a f.i �_ }y } i flilli.ig i9 �{:iS E }!� t'. } }1�11. i+ i g 2-ioi ll�.00n:.�.� 3�. . .. .,.as ,. i.x,:3},y..,.3 �,. i•ii-3�n.:., 3 .,.,. .,�..,..., ,,3...�.�.» .Ii• � l . �:., �.>, Project Description: Drainage Improvements for Tributary WJ-1 to West Jones Branch Description of Services Added/Deleted: According to Article V of the original contract for professional services, we are submitting a fee for proceeding with the preliminary design, 404 permitting, final design, and construction services phases for the improvements contained in Stormwater Management Plan 2, as defined iin the Conceptual Design Report for Tributary WJ-1, The scope for these phases of the project is defined in the original contract. The scope of the construction services phase Is reduced to one pre-construction meeting, one walk-through inspection, and producing record drawings. Site visits 1 and review of submittals will be considered an additional service. 1 Deliverables: jThree (3) sets of full size preliminary drawings Preliminary estimate of probable cost Draft Individual 404 Permit application for Owner's review Three (3) sets of full size final drawings and specifications marked "Preliminary" Six (6) sets of full site final drawings and specifications marked "For Construction" One (1) sat of full size reproducible drawings marked "Record Drawings" Compensation shall be adjusted as follows: L For ell professional services rendered under this agreement, including the preliminary design, 404 permitting, final design, and construction services (Phases 2 and 3), Owner agrees to pay FNi a fee not to exceed Eighty-nine Thousand Dollars ($89.000) in accordance with Attachment CO - Compensation of the original contract. Original Contract $ 21.000 Revised Total Contract_ $_110.000 Schedule shall be adjusted as follows: The survey will take place in August of 1998 and the Preliminary Design will take place from August to November of 1998. The above described services shall proceed upon return of this Contract Change Authorization. Services will be billed as they are done. All other provisions, terms,and conditions of the agreement for services which are not expressly amended shall remain in full force and effect O A contract modification will be aubmitted. ❑ This Contract Change Authorization will serve as contract modification. FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.: CLIENT: BY: /AP BY: TITLE: PrI tic•,ia a./ TITLE: DATE: 4z yaJ /2i J99c DATE: OISTRIBUTIONK PM, GROUP MGR„ DISC.LDR., OPER.ANAL., CONTRACT ADMIN. 4066INTERNATIONAL PLAZA,SUITE 200•FORT WORM.TEXAS 70100.4096•TELEPHONE:817.735-7300• METRO:817421.1800•FAX S17.7344451 IU31FQiA 91CONCHC.FnMI 04/94 5E-3 AUG-12-19 e. 17:06 Freese a Nichols, _nc. 91'' 735 ''4S1 P.03%03 ill + 1 0 v I, tc o lojo�I�le a �I��j;e mi s le§e a o 0 0 0 0 $ i I I 1 I I , I II I-- i i Y e1... ca. 1 IT— I Ir..el� '�^ m � � 401. (11..., U es I •j • 1 LEI g »i le;ol� j 1 �I t Lli 0 i t 0= 0 0 0 0 0 0 N .(�•.IPry1 la P;E M 1 �I ; : „qy w I I t^�IU{. r I I I I -al____. 1 • to j . -r- I i I . K i t.._r._I I , . ;yin �1� I l~ ° s rs l to � ! 1 _ _ It i ee I ; I— cc oo oo�0000l �oo��o� i I a n � nn ( I 1 i1 O IT W I ep ��n 1� ,�� ! • A � r { I cz +� �� m� ; a I I �!ry i i I I ry Lu IeII I,l Ing ee� ee .�I. 05 a eIeI eee1 a „ j c. I nnerw � t71Ir4 17 .................•1 =• Y 1 ; 1 1 ;" I ��a�so� � a � I I 1 I I l e I I I m• Si 'I ►11 jE _Q0 ���Flo r I I 7..1 w ; A°°o o HIa! —; I , ICI li I ! I I I I I i I I I �3 ,.,�„a�� �+ I v,ao 00 U L 0 .. , IN^ 2" laic 0I PIv • ( I f 1 I I I w _ ' 100 l00J0I00 I 00000 I 10000010 100010 >> I tri I I 1 I I I 11 1- 1 I I I i I l l 1 : ■ 1 I , Il Ii I l II I i II II � p I ?,1-, ,-,I I t ,p .. O O ID 9 �O OIO i7. I O O l7:0 O e e e Oie el C7 J Y 1 111 tl I t- x I II i I i I . a i II.z! Ii I . �' a_ ailit w -1 ' # Al i 1. 1 r iii 110j 2,, Illiii liqii Gilt II 1111 IM1 iii P 11 '!i'11Ii i r hi f wla v1 d e I 1 w e c c a 4v u d a .e of (1)1 1I I a i , i i i ^ I ICI. Lise TOTAL P.03 5E-4 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ' �- STATE OF TEXAS J LCLTYOFTARP-ST y 0r ,7 . .-7 .,-�t RECORD This AGREEMENT is entered into by City of Southlake. hereinafter called "OWNER' and Freese and Nichols. Inc., hereinafter called "FYI'. In consideration of the AGREE.:\IEN I'S herein, the parties auee as follows: I. EMPLOYNIENT OF FNI: In accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT: OWNER azees to employ FNI: FNI agrees to perform professional services in connection with the Project; OWNER a-ees to pay to FYI compensation. The Project is described as follows: Develop and implement storm water management master plans for West Jones Branch in support of State Highway 1.14 improvements. 7. SCOPE OF SERVICES: FYI shall render professional services in connection with Project as set forth in Attachment SC - Scope of Services and Responsibilities of OWNER which is attached to and made a part of this AGREEMENT. . rrr COMPENSATION: OWNER azees to pay FYI a fee not to exceed Twenty-One Thousand Dollars (S_1,000), for all professional services rendered under this AGREENMENT in accordance with Attachment CO - Compensation, which is attached hereto and made a part of this AGREEMENT. [V. TERMS ..SD CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT: The Terms and Conditions of Agreement as set forth as Attachment TC shall govern the relationship between the OWNER and FNI. Nothing under this AGREEMENT shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this AGREEMENT to anyone ether than OWNER and FYI. and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this AGREEMENT will be (iv or the sole and exclusive benefit of OWNER and FNI and not for the benefit of any other party. This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire AGREEMENT between OWNER and FYI and supersedes all prior written or oral understandings. This contract is executed in two counterparts. I.; TESTN :r O� I-EP OF. they have executed this AGREEMENT. the r! day of (i- t.,-, 1998. \\\\\Nil t llIlllllp ) ATTEST: .04_ ••;�',=_ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 0 e 'er' i> = (OWNER) \A e ' e r i I 4 A 4P' ''‘', Illprylltta,`" ATTEST: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. ( +I) /7 I �� ,r. By- .. • . . .1,i / ) ,AI (...„ / _._ 5E-5 ATTACKti1ENT SC SCOPE OF SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF OWNER (ilire ARTICLE 1 BASIC SERVICES: FNI shall render the following professional services in connection with the development of the Project: A. Introduction The scope of work provides Phase II drainage master planning and the implementation of proposed improvements for Tributary WJ-1 and the downstream portion of the West Jones Branch watershed. It is our understanding that this particular branch will be impacted by the planned improvements to State Highway 114 that are scheduled for construction in the year 2000. Therefore, this proposal is developed with the view that City of Southlake storm water improvements will be in place by January 2000. FYI's scope of work does not provide any planning, evaluation, or improvements for the West Jones Branch stream segment that is west of the confluence of Tributary WJ-1 and West Jones Branch. B. Phases Multiple phases are proposed to accomplish the complete scope of work. The phases are generally described as follows: PHASE I 1. Data collection. 2. Develop stream management alternatives for Tributary vVJ-1 and obtain City of Southlake concurrence for a (tigi preferred concept plan. 3. Meet with Corps of Engineers (COE) and other federal and state agencies to coordinate the planned improvements PHASE II 1. Field surveys will be implemented for the subsequent design phases after coordinating the proposed solution with the regulator. agencies. ?. Prepare Preliminary Plans for the proposed improvements . 3. Initiate preparation of required easement documents. 4. At the completion of the Preliminary Plans phase. a formal 404 Permit Application will be developed and submitted to the Corp_ of Engineers. -. Final plan development will begin during the permit review phase as information is received from the Corps of Engineers. Final documents for advertisement will be completed as soon as possible after COE notification of permit approval. 6. Advertisement- bid, and construction award for the planned improvements. L q4r _. Fz Z; SE-6 OWNER( fyI( PHASE 01 Construction phase. PHASE IV Finalize Tributary WJ-1 to the West Jones Branch drainage master plan. C. Phase Activities PHASE I I. Data Collection Immediately upon notice to proceed. FYI will obtain available data related to the drainage area from the City of Southlake and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). We will attend one (1) meeting with the city and TxDOT to obtain available data. Data needed includes, but not limited to, property ownership data. easement descriptions, existing or planned right-of-ways, plans of existing drainage improvements, and plans of proposed improvements. Develop Storm Water Management.Plan for Tributary WJ-1 to West Jones Branch FYI will attend one (1) initial meeting with city officials to discuss in general the stream management solutions that should be considered. Following this meeting, FYI proposes one (1) meeting in the field with Corps of Engineers (COE) personnel to discuss the proposed project and seek their input into the stream management process. (re FYI will evaluate no more than three (3) possible alternative drainage control concepts and report the findings to the city at one i l; meeting. New hydrology will be developed and incorporated into the stream models. Existing computer models will be used to assist in evaluating stream flow conditions and possible improvements. Unmodeled stream segments will be developed using the existing City of Southlake Topographic Maps or other available topographic data. These models will be useful as a general planning tools.but are not suitable for accurate flood level definition. A letter report will be developed that discusses each alternative, the anticipated control the alternative provides for the 100-year storm event, probable environmental issues. and a general estimate of probable cost for implementation. Flood limit definition will use best available topographic maps. One meeting i,lt will be held with city staff to select the preferred solution based upon this preliminary level of evaluation. After identification of the preferred alternative, FYI will participate in one (1) City Council workshop and/or meeting to present the plan and obtain council approval for Tributary WJ-1 to the West Jones Branch storm water management master plan. 3. Regulatory A_ency Coordination FYI will =a:12e on site meetings with the anticipated regulatory agencies. Foremost among these agencies will be the Corps of Engineers. Other agencies that may participate include Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC), U.S. Fish and Wildlife. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and possibly others. FYI engineer and environmental scientists will have one (1) meeting with the agencies. review existing conditions, identify the planned improvements by TxDOT and the City's proposed storm water management plan for Tributary WJ-1 for West Jones Branch. Based upon this meeting. FYI will recommend continuation with the proposed master plan. or suggest modifications to the plan that, in our opinion, will best meet the conditions and requirements identified by the regulatory agencies. 0 5E-7 ° 3r i PHASE II Le1. Field Surveys .after the regulatory coordination meetings, field surveys will begin. Depending upon the identified storm water management plan. the survey effort can be tailored to meet the requirements for development of engineering plans. Concurrent with the field survey for engineering design, the surveyor will identify property corners. landowners, existing easements and etc. For engineering purposes the following survey data are required: a. Topographic maps (1' contour interval) of stream segments. b. Existing drainage facilities, roadways. select trees (-I" diameter and larger), fences. and other features that will influence drainage characteristics. c. Existing building locations and finished floor elevations for those facilities that may be near the stream area and considered potential for flood damage. d. Locate existing utilities and utility easements. e. Property owners and property corners. In addition, an archeological survey, as required for permitting, will be performed for the stream sernents along which improvements will be made. ?. Preliminary Plans Prepare preliminary engineering drawings for the planned improvements. Plans will be completed to approximately a 50% level of completion sufficient for city review and to generally identify the scope of the project. Engineering plans will be coordinated with the COE. Three (_3) sets of full size preliminary drawings (....,,, and a preliminary estimate of probable construction cost will be submitted to the city for review. One (1) meeting with the city will be held to review the proposed improvements and receive comments. 3. Easements Development of easement legal descriptions will begin immediately after the preliminary plan review meeting with the city. 4. 404 Permit .application FNI will prepare the Section 404 application for an Individual Permit (EIG FORM 4345). The application will include the name and address of the applicant, description of the proposed activity. discussion of the purpose for the proposed project, description of the limits of impacts to waters of the U.S.. names and addresses -of adjoining property owners (this information is to be provided by Owner), description of the water body. appropriate figures. and the preliminary plans. FNI's environmental scientists will assist Owner in identifying project design enhancement features along the limits of the proposed project. Enhancement measures include such items as providing natural structures within the confines of the stream channel, routing low flows through bypassed natural channels, recommending trapezoidal earthen banks where feasible, etc. The permit application will include text and figures appropriate for the public notice. The public notice textifigures will be included as an attachment to the Individual Permit application. The intent of this attachment is to provide the COE with the pertinent information for the public notice in a format that will require minimal revision, thereby. expediting the COE's process time for the public notice. 1 , 5E-8 OWNeli____ The draft permit application will be submitted to Owner for review prior to submittal to the COE. Owner's cprnments will be incorporated into the final permit application and submitted to the COE. or to Corner for submittal to the COE, within 10 days of receipt of the Owner's comments. a. Meet with Owner FNI will attend one (1.) meeting with Owner to discuss the permit application. It is intended that this meeting will occur after Owner has reviewed the draft permit application. Comments from Owner will be received at this time. FYI will then prepare the final permit application for submittal to the C.O.E. 5. Final Design Based upon the City's comments and the preliminary comments from the COE and other agencies, FYI will begin preparation of final engineering documents suitable for advertisement of construction. It is anticipated that the preliminary review comments from the regulatory agencies will allow concurrent final design and development of the construction documents. If necessary, the plans will be modified to reflect the elements of the approved 404 Permit. Specifications will be based upon the North Central Texas Council of Government Standard Specifications. Three full size drawings and specifications will be submitted to the City of Southlake for review. Following one (1) review session with city staff to receive comments, the final plans will be completed and submitted to the City of Southlake for advertisement by the city. A final estimate of probable construction cost will be provided to the city. 6. Advertisement, Bid, and Award of Contract FYI will assist the city during this phase by: L. a. Answering questions from contractors and suppliers. b. Attending one (1) pre-bid conference. c. Attending one (1) bid opening and assist with preparation of the bid tabulation d. Making recommendations for contract award. PHASE I. Construction Administration Assist Owner in conducting one (1) pre-construction conference with the Contractor(s), review construction schedules prepared by the Contractor(s) pursuant to the requirements of the construction contract, and prepare a proposed estimate of monthly cash requirements for the Project. FYI shall furnish six(6) full size sets of final plans to Owner marked "For Construction". Make up to nine (9) visits to the site to observe the progress and the quality of work and to attempt to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. If FYI is requested to visit the site more than 9 times. the requested visits shall be considered an Additional Service and FYI shall be entitled to additional compensation. L 7 5E-g O N • In performing the services outlined above, FYI will endeavor to protect Owner azainst defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractors and FYI will report any observed deficiencies to Owner, however, it is understood that FYI does not guarantee the Contractor's performance, nor is FYI responsible for supervision of the Contractor's operation and employees. F I shall not be responsible for the means, methods. techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor, or any safety precautions and programs relating in any way to the condition of the premises. the work of the Contractor or any Subcontractor. FYI shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person (except his own employees or agents) at the Project sites or otherwise performing any of the work of the Project. Review samples, catalog data, schedules, shop drawings, laboratory, shop mill tests of material and test equipment, and other data pursuant to the Construction Contract. Interpret intent of the plans and technical specifications for Owner and Contractor and prepare change orders as needed to clarify the intent of the plans and specifications. Prepare monthly and final estimates, based on quantities provided by the City Inspector, utilizing the estimate forms provided by Owner, pursuant to the Construction Contract. Change orders shall be prepared when required to reflect a change of construction scope. Conduct, in company :with Owner's representaiivc, a iinai review of the Project for conformance with the design concept of the Project and general compliance with the Contract Documents, and review and comment on the certificate of completion and the recommendation for final payment to the Contractor(s). Revise the construction drawing in accordance with the information famished by construction Cortractor(s) reflecting changes in the Project made during construction. One set of reproducible prints of "Record Drawings" shall be provided by FYI to Owner. L.?HASE FYI will develop a formal report of the drainage master plan for West Jones Branch. The report will review the various stream managements alternatives, environmental issues and their impact upon the alternatives, a general planning estimate of probable construction cost, and maps showing the selected plan and level of flood control. ARTICLE II ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Additional Services to be performed by FYI, if authorized by Owner, which are not included in the above described basic services, include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Preparing the application and follow-up coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMP.). ?. Preparing applications and supporting documents for govemment 3ants, loans, or planning advances, and providing data for detailed applications. 3. Providing toll time site inspection during construction of the Project. 4. Performing desks for trench safety and retaining walls. etc.. not included in the above Scope of Services. . Revisions to plans as a result of design modifications requested by Owner or by the contractor after completion of original final design: runless to correct error on original plans). Low- . 5E-10 6. Appearing before regulatory agencies or courts as an expert witness in any litigation with third parties or condemnation proceedings arising from the development or construction of the Project. including preparation of engineering data and reports for assistance to Owner. ‘111ire 7. Assisting Owner in claims disputes with Contractors). 3. Assisting Owner in the defense or prosecution of litigation in connection with or in addition to those services contemplated by this A3'eement. Such services, if any, shall be famished by FNI on a fee basis negotiated by the respective parties outside of and in addition to this Agreement. 9. Providing environmental support services, including the deli, and implementation of ecological baseline studies, archeological surveys, environmental monitoring, impact assessment and analyses, permitting assistance other than listed in the above Scope of Services, and other assistance required to address environmental issues. 10. Geotechnical investigation of subsurface conditions. 11. Attending homeowners and/or Council meetings other than those described in the Scope of Services, including preparation of all displays, reports, or other data for use at such meetings. ricatio i tcd t� i 12. Preparing plans and,'or spccu,,.a�,�n; r:,�a��,. to �,c revocation of utilities. ARTICLE IE TIME OF COMPLETION: FYI is authorized to commence work on the Project upon execution of this AGREEMENT and suggests the following schedule in order to meet the anticipated S. H. 114 improvements. Phase Time Frame Concept Storm water Management Plan, West Jones Branch, WJ-1 May- June 1993 Review with Agencies July 1998 Survey July 1993 Preliminary Design July 1993 - October 1998 404 Permit November 1993 - February 1999 Easements November 1993 - January 1999 Final Design February 1999 - March 1999 Advertise. Bid. c Award March 1999 - April 1999 Construction June 1999 - December 1999 .ARTICLE IV RESPO:NSIBILITIES OF OWNER: Owner shall perform the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the Lrvjces of FNI: FN 5E-11 OWN 1. Assist FN1 by placing at FNTs disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to desism or construction of the Project. 2. Examine submittals from FYI within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of FYI. 3. Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Article III. ARTICLE V ENGINEERING FEE: Because of the indeterminacy of the effort for the latter phases of this project, the engineering fee for only PHASE I is provided in Attachment CO. Fees for Phases II, III, and IV will be submitted to the OWNER for approval near the completion of Phase I. L n_=939fCCR:C 1,47.2_a'_^_.:)93`,C:.N _A. I.A1C;i3 ON: Fti7\, 5E-12 OWNS ATTACHMENT CO COMPENSATION A Not to Exceed: The total fee for Phase I Services.n Attachmert SC snail ce cased on the Schedule of Charges out shall not exceed Twerty-O L77eusa7d Dollars(321.000). If FNI sees the Scope of Services Or.argirg so that additional services are needed,Inc:udirg cut net'imitee to 'rose services described as Ad6ittcral Services:n Attachment SC.FNI Hill notify OWNER for OWNER's approval before proceeding. ACCt1:crai Services snail ce comcuted cased on he Scnedule of Charges. Fees fcc Phases II,III,and IV MII be submitted to OWNER far acorva;-ear the completion of work`or Phase I. 3 Schedule of Charges for Additional Work: POSITION MIN MAX PR:NC:PAL 154.28 191.71 SENICP CONSULTANT 75 C6 224.34 MANAGER-BRANCH OFFICE 117.02 150.54 RCUP MANAGER 136.39 153.97 SR CISCIPL:NE LEADER 147 59 172.24 CISCIP_.NE LEADER 34 13 149.57 PROGPAM MANAGER 34.11 105.14 ENGINEER VI 98.40 125.13 ENGINEER V 90.48 114.33 ENGINEER'/ 79.46 99.18 ENGINEER:II 37 10 35.36 ENGINEER II 50.13 75.04 ENGINEER I 53.13 36.01 ELECTP;CAL ENGINEER ill 58.32 90.46 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER d 51.27 67.29 MECHANICAL ENGINEER V 81.16 106.52 MECHANICAL ENGINEER IV 74.36 98.00 MECHANICAL ENGINEER III 72.59 91.76 RESICENT ENGINEER 92.58 121.50 _ENlr-o RESIDENT REPREEENT:.AT?JE 72.37 92.73 DESIGNER II 5554 1C0.72 DESIGNER I 60.05 74.08 SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 75.96 86.71 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 59.76 77.38 TECHNICAN II 51 47 56.57 .CHP:CIAN I 43.52 53.42 CRAFTER, 43.13 48.31 S`•MATCRSCHEDULER 49.47 51.34 CONS'RLCTICN SERVICES ADMIN ASST 39 31 49.76 DOCUMENT CONTROL CLERK 39.31 49.13 LENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST VII 37.34 109.92 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST V 73.97 92.46 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST iV 71.05 93.18 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST III 58.79 63.24 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST II 55.29 61.49 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I 40.30 48.78 SENIOR ARCHITECT 103.25 129.07 ARCHITECT V 34.90 106.13 ARCHITECT III 666.30 33 25 ARCHITECT II 54.75 58.44 HYCRO_CGIST IV 55.53 72.38 •-I'!CPCCEOLOGIST 74 29 32.37 'NCRD =ROCESSINGiSECRETAR:AL 38.12 44 38 OPERA`ONSANALYST 56.74 32.37 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR 39 38 49 35 NFCRMATICN SERVICES CLERK 38 29 44.27 CO-OP 17.00 38.20 The ranges and mdiridual salaries trill be adjusted annually. RATES 7CR INHOUSE SERVICES Comouter and CAD Calcomp Plotter PC CAC Stations 510.30 per hour Bond $2.00 per plot PC Stators $8.00 per hour Color 33.50 per plot 'IAA COrcuter $20.30 per hcur Vellum $4.00 per plot Myiar 310.00 per plot Print Shoo 3lueur_s 30.08 per square`Oct Cefset aro Xerox Copies 50.07 per single side copy Offset a-o Xerox Copies 30.14 per double side copy GEC 3:rding(Reg.Cover; 32.00 per pock DEC 3.7dirg(E:rccss.Cover) 34.00 per bock Tape S.roirg(Reg.Cover; 31..75 per Peck Tape 3:rOirg(E7cess.Cover) 53.75 per bock Testing Apparatus Censiry Meter 5353 30 per Tenth Das D_tactics 310 CO per test LOTHER DIRECT EXPENSES :cner d::c_:expenses are relmourse:it actual dust times s muiuplier of I 15 They Include ouu:oe or:nung and reproduction npense :ommumut:on expense.asec.:nnspornuon and:uosiscence away:tom Fort'.Norm mu omen nuceilaneous esoen:es 7secrly refaced:o the•.poro..ncludmg costs of!abonrory analysts.testa.and other cork required:o oe done no - nueoenuen:persons other than:ta.•T member. / � .e" FM-0.cm 34A 31-31-98 OWNER, 5E-13 • ATT'ACKNEEN.T TC 8-20-96 TERtiLS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT I. DEFINITIONS: The term Owner as used herein refers to the City of Soutrlalce The term FNI as used herein refers to Freese and Nichols, Inc., its employees and agents; also its subcontractors and their employees and agents. As used herein,Services refers to the professional services performed by Freese and Nichols pursuant to the AGREEMENT'. 2 CHANGES:Owner,without invalidating the AGREEMENT,may order changes within the general scope of the WORK required by the AGREEMENT by altering, adding to and/or deducting from the WORK to be performed. If any change under this clause causes an increase or decrease in FNI's cost of,or the time required for,the performance of any part of the Services under the AGREEMENT, an equitable adjustment will be made by mutual agreement and the AGREEMENT modified in writing accordingly. 3. TERM NATION: The obligation to provide services under this AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party upon ten days' written notice. In the event of termination,FNI will be paid for all services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred to the date of termination and, in addition, all reimbursable expenses directly attributable to termination. 4. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES: In no event shall FYI or its subcontractors be liable in contract, tort,strict liability, warranty,or otherwise for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages,such as loss of product, loss of use of the equipment or system, loss of anticipated profits or revenue,non-operation or increased expense of operation or other equipment or sy teens. 5. INFORMATION FURNISHED BY OWNER Owner will assist FNI by placing at FNI's disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. FNI shall have no liability for defects or negligence in the Services attributable to FNI's reliance upon or use of data, design criteria, drawings, specifications or other information furnished by Owner and Owner agrees to indemnify and hold FNI harmless from any and all claims and judgments,and all losses,costs and expenses arising therefrom. FNI shall disclose to Owner,prior to use thereof,defects or omissions in the data,design criteria,drawings,specifications or other information (Iiroe furnished by Owner to FNI that FNI may reasonably discover in its review and inspection thereof. 6. INSURANCE:FNI shall provide to Owner certificates of insurance which shall contain the following minimum coverage (All limits in thousands): Commercial General Liability Workers' Compensation General Aggregate S2,000 Each Accident S500 Automobile Liability(Any Auto) Professional Liability CSL Sl,OCO S3,000 Annual Aggregate 7. SUBCONTRACTS:If,for any reason,at any time during the progress of providing Services,Owner determines that any subcontractor for FNI is incompetent or undesirable, Owner will notify FYI accordingly and FNI shall take immediate steps for cancellation of such subcontract. Subletting by subcontractors shall be subject to the same regulations. Nothing contained in the AGREEMENT shall create any contractual relation between any subcontractor and Owner. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All drawings,reports data and other project information developed in the execution of the Services provided under this AGREEMENT shall be the property of the Owner upon payment of FYI's fees for services. FNI may retain copies for record purposes. Owner agrees such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by Owner or others. Any reuse by Owner or by those who obtained said documents from Owner without written verification or adaptation by FNI will be at Owner's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to FNI, or to FtiTs independent associates or consultants, and Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless FNI and FNI's independent associates and consultants from all claims,damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle FM to further reasonable compensation. FNI may reuse all drawings,report data and other project information in the execution of the Services provided under this AGREEMENT in FNTs other activities. Any reuse by FNI will be at FNI's sole risk and without liability or legal (Iiiire exposure to Owner, and FM shall indemnify and hold harmless Owner from all claims,damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. - FNI--r- OWtiER'i11_ or • 5E-14 16 4" 547.5 gpm 2.5 gpm 10 TEXAS MOTOR SPEEDWAY- gpm 1667.0 gpm (2.40 MGD) j J1031 N 550.0 gpm INTEL---," 5556.0 gpm 811.9..gpm ` 21" %Bq4�5 jpm 24' 584-1T,0m 1811.9 ---- -- 2.5 Pm 89 gpm 0 .1500' 3000' 9Pm I WESTLAKt'; j 1 24 1 -�=3000' gpM_, 2.5 TROP y d orrIV. gpm lip, 4973.2 gpm P PircT # 1 % 8675.0 gpm 9589.§.,g -4 tp . ..... �301;5,'gpm o `,"0675-0 913�t 8675.0 gp�il 654:g'�m Pm R 13648.2 gpm 4 OANIOKE� 2430.5, 12" qP 2 1 16" 7732.0 gpm -------- WESTLAKE #2 4499.2 gpm16- .. .... 4476.0 gpm 3554.2 gprn 12" 3 T 170.0 gpm 0, 945.0 gpm Obip.4 gp 3e (2001)'--l- 2687.3 gpm ---- -- ---- ----- - 30. 16749.0 gpm 2 1". 4347.8 gpm 16749.0 gpm 31 118124.2 gpr� J 21" 21" 4347.8 gpm 4347.8 gpm PRbACT: �zl 21"' CAYLOR TANK i if OVERFLOW ELV. 853 4347.8 gpm PROJE 14061".8 gpm 36' f. MODEL ELV. 828 i I 5 MG TANK ------ 7. --- ----- - 01- 742.6 gpm 112�' (2605) 2--4 L • 30' 3(y�j 11.7 28289.5 gpm z ...... . .... I Ala a 0 (n 007 08�0.9 gpm A 11603 6.gpm -Z 17416.9 gpm .,3U' 28289.5 gpm If 9pm, 01) 1242 (20i FF�EESE�NICHC)LS 21" .6. -PROJECT, #2 SSlqllfl cApAcrrY: FLORENCE 18j24.21,gpm 3605.2 gpm Pm Wl LEGEND 14958.6 gpm (20.101) EXISTING WATER LINE 24 24 rr PROPOSED FORT WORTH WATER LINE 14722.0 gp PEARS6!N1, PEARSON �E PROPOSED NETCRW WATER LINE TANK,. �7 TANK 356.9 gpm FLOW RATE KELLER 12 SOUTHLAKE 1 # 356,9 gpm MAX DAY NETCRW DEMANDS 1147122'.9 qpm 8675.0 gpm 356.9 gpm MAX DAY Fr. WORTH DEMANDS -- ---- ........ ----- ------ ------ TANK 36' PUMP a 1495$.6 gpm :13231.7 gpm 3605.2 gpm 36" 21� - ------- - 141 JL4'. NORTH EACH -PROJEGT Pf 0dEjCT` - #2'- TANK. .. - -- p -: .......... ELV. 746 Y SYSTEM DEMANDS 21" Z PROJECTED MAX DA 38" UNE SOUTHLAXE P.4 KELLER OF",!.OF THE NORTH BEACH TANK #1 PUMP STATION 13700.2 gpm 3k! 1(5 179 p- M II I 2, )gp- 3er 11260-0 gPr-n YEokR 2030 60503 gpm (87.1 MGD) FIGURE 4 IMPROVEMENTS 21 1323 qp- -4 (2001) 36" 3r t► YEAR 2030 28658.8 gpm 34- t 2T i 2$, 21 1 r 21 SYSTEM OPERATION 31795.6 gpm Ir ► SUPPLY FROM EAST;SIDE 11 3e I i-j I KELLER P.S. 2030 - 29822 gpm (43.0 MCD) w City of Southlake, Texas - MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E.Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for the construction of a sanitary sewer lift station to serve the Raintree/Shady Lane area Background • Sanitary sewer has been installed in most of the Raintree/Shady Lane area and residents have begun to connect to the service lines. A lift station is proposed to pump the wastewater from the Raintree/Shady Lane area to the gravity sanitary sewer located at Dove St. and the future Kirkwood Blvd. This is a staged-construction program in that staff is proposing that the lift station start construction before the force main is bid. Staff is working to acquire the easements for the force main and will request permission to bid the force main upon their acquisition. Because of the longer time frame to build the lift station and the time for delivery of pumps, staff recommends Council consider the proposed lift station be built first. The estimated cost of this project is $467,500. The FY 1997-98 CIP budget provides $318,750 and the remaining $148,750 is proposed as part of the FY 1998-99 CIP budget. The design is complete and the City has acquired the property where the lift station is proposed to be located: Recommendation Staff recommends Council authorize advertisement for bids for the construction of a sanitary sewer lift station to serve the Raintree/Shady Lane area. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. B W/cre Attachment: Map Exhibit L 5F-1 w _____ Proposed Sanitary Sewer L,... Pressure System • __, - TR kUft Statio - .1111 _ j;"--im..7:00Th.40 . - Lonesome Dove L _ - _ Lift-Station — - _ Shady Lane - =LifLStation- - II Lift Station ^• / Gravity Main /\/ 14 I nch Force Main fT Al 18 Inch Force Main $o Ut I- , City of Southlake ____ ___ 5F-2 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 (kr, TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of bid to Reynolds Asphalt, Inc. for the paving of streets in the Raintree/Shady Lane area Background The Raintree/Shady Lane area is currently receiving sanitary sewer and water improvements as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. Included in this project are proposed street improvements. Once the sanitary sewer is installed, street improvements can begin. The sewer and water improvements are mostly complete. If Council accepts the low bid, street improvements are anticipated to begin in late August or early September. This will complete the final phase of the project. Low bidder for the project is Reynolds Asphalt, Inc. with a low bid of$299,812.80. The 97-98 CIP budget provides $650,000 to fund this project and a future culvert to be installed as part of the proposed W. Jones Branch channel improvements to prepare for the expansion of SH 114. From the total amount above, the CIP budget provides $318,000 for paving, $225,000 for the proposed sewer connection to Grapevine, and $107,000 for the culvert. Bid advertisements were published on July 19 and 26. 1998. Bids were publicly opened and read aloud on August 5, 1998. Bid Tabulation Please refer to the attached bid tabulation prepared by Cheatham and Associates. Recommendation Staff recommends Council award Reynolds Asphalt. Inc. the contract for paving of streets in the Raintree/Shady Lane area. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre Attachment: Bid Tabulation 5G-1 City of S Le Area of Proposed PavingImprovements lit1 1 0.7,,,, ,s.. , ,,..polo • I do 101 -. ' f f 1 ,tv ., SOAT6DS0‘4 L _. 0:71',:0 0. 0: 'tkl ..‘ �,_ , & -s MI - = ,I itr G , ,��( N A a No Scale ' EAST C---1: / i .A. n /__ DISCLAIMER This data has been compiled for The — ft Ly of Southlake. �hrious official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information.Every effort D U t h l Ql was made to ensure the accuracy of this data,however,no guarantee is of said r Implied as to the accuracy 5G4 Public Works• City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 L TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of bid to Reynolds Asphalt, Inc. for the paving of streets in the Raintree/Shady Lane area Background The Raintree/Shady Lane area is currently receiving sanitary sewer and water improvements as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. Included in this project are proposed street improvements. Once the sanitary sewer is installed, street improvements can begin. The sewer and water improvements are mostly complete. If Council accepts the low bid, street improvements are anticipated to begin in late August or early September. This will complete the final phase of the project. Low bidder for the project is Reynolds Asphalt, Inc. with a low bid of$299,812.80. The 97-98 CIP budget provides $650,000 to fund this project and a future culvert to be installed as part of the proposed W. Jones Branch channel improvements to prepare for the expansion of SH 114. From the total amount above, the CIP budget provides $318,000 for paving, $225,000 for the proposed sewer connection to Grapevine, and $107,000 for the culvert. Bid advertisements were published on July 19 and 26. 1998. Bids were publicly opened and read aloud on August 5, 1998. Bid Tabulation Please refer to the attached bid tabulation prepared by Cheatham and Associates. Recommendation Staff recommends Council award Reynolds Asphalt. Inc. the contract for paving of streets in the Raintree/Shady Lane area. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre Lir Attachment: Bid Tabulation 5G-1 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co • O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 u) 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N N M N O O Co N 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 O N 0 0 (O C O O O CO Cn 0 F- 0 Co O Co N N 0 0 0 V Yr < 0 0 0 Y- 0 01 O Yr.CO (0 0 a N 0O N ( 0 0) (D e- N r. CA'0 N ? C7 '- O C7 r 63 n O W O 69 CA Co co CA 69 69 (A CA fA CA CA CA 6 (A 69 (A CCo CC (ti Q M N O I� i:::. o u- 0Owa O z ao ui Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Co 0 Co 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 O00 i �= U DNcov `r " N0000nnoNooCo0CoC a0000uoi W Z m O O ? C ^ N N 0 O 00 Co o x a = O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C1 O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co CO N O u) N •f O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 ❑ u) u) N C) 0 CO O 41 uC N N O O O O 0) O N O CO 0 0 O Co Q • C) Co F- 0) (0 (0 (0 Yr r` O N 1- 0 r T u) N O N 0 n u) r` n 0 0 Co 0 W (O C7 N O u) C) .- (O N m CA lA o c. C1 N O u) C N N N N Co I.-- .- e- O V VA fA CA CA V3 Kl Cfl CA CA 03 CA 69 C to H CA 69 CA 03 CD 6a = N R NI. C.) W C2N N. 0 Z 0) 0) m O Co u) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N 0 CD 0 Co O CD 0 0 00 0 0 CD o 0 00 0 0 V7 F- w N . u) V W N . O O u) O 6 u) O O O O O ui O O O O Z O W C.) N 0 u) (O N N N O O C O e- N N C O O F- Cti Z x Z e- Co N e- N C7 CO e-- 00 e- e- Co •a CD N e- • ¢ 02 ¢ x a re ^ CD CD CD O CD CD O O O CD CD CD CD CD CD O CD CD O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 Co N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CDF N O O V C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O e- Co N Co C 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 O O 0 N 0 0 0 0 7 V r\ O F < R n - (0 (D 0 0 Co Co C- CO 0 0 Co Co 0 r- CO 01 Co Co O M z u) O• � CO N CO Co Co Co7 N v r Co f9 CA(A Co N N O Co .- (A eA (A . fA �} u) CO O �»CO �(A w W CA (A (A(A erF 69 W w» CA N 7 U vr- °r.) U p r O N C) C) 0 O Q ^ x^ N Cb .6 CO 1.4 O u) o Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 CO O Co 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O DO � uI H V vim -- cci y (' - 000NoC ci 0000C (ci onC ci 00 Z Z � QO W Z x Z N e- - r- N 41 u) e- 0 OLLl (2 d zm a.m O F--- O (na- Y W U L U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H v O o v o 0 0 0 0 o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o OD W Q oui (Dv00000000000oco000o N J u) O N Co O Co Co Co N O O O O O O CO R Co O ? [A T - CO CD V 0 01 r` CO r- N 0) r` O 0) CO ul Cn O Co N N O1 Co T CO CO C!) u) r` u) O O O u) N 6 C CO N .- 0 C7 C) N 63 H 63 Oi Om Q 0 fA CA 69(!,(A N Q a o C Q eA CON- N- - a Qo � mm 0 N M o 0 0 0 0 0 u) O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.4 0 Co O o Co O O R O O O o C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co m W x (n F- w 4 N 01 C) Co N O O O o O O 0) 0 0 0 0 u) O ui O O 0 O m Z Z U O N Co Cog N N Co N Co O O0 CO 0) N u) Co C ? W O ❑ E N 0 O xxaa a ccaWa (L Co O D O o O 0 u) u Co 0 O 0 C C u) e N MO 0 - 0 z DON0 < oOCC 0 C ¢d } o V DO J N (1) win* a Z (LYZ } } tL } QQ (LLL (L (LQ ¢ Q � W u_ u_ LL (L } Z4 . J (A O (n CA Cn W W J J __I J W w W Z J J J J J ui WI m N cn o w — o to y W LLI y z a UU mw > F- F O < Z O ci W aZ J m ze 0 2 - n z cc � O ¢ N 0 w w2 0 3LL 2U oaas z < a U) < O V } 0. O x Z w w w 0 nW W 1 u Q Q wz W I a W J m U o6 (0 1 m d W F p (n F- F- U � F- Q - Ce30 - w Q � � Ws � (n WUU0LLUmX LU CC CC aC 0 O ~ F- W N 0 X J M O x ¢ J Z Z 0 eQ Z Q m o J J CC CC ❑ W Z 2 LLO tu 2az rn w ¢ L. F ❑ QOQ2 > e- ,_ � 0W3 ❑ � QQUU °rCn 11.1 WQ' W Q jwm C07 - acaww W ¢ xx cc wy � NJ¢ cc -- :E t; v; 1" I-: z _ - 4 , 0 O } m m 0. a 2 Q 2 Q u) X - w W 2 -- X w w (L O W\ ~ C WrQ 111 ❑ 4CC) � � F- � ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 CD JyX ¢ W W W WNY / W Z ~ 22 CD 0 to Um 2 = MU ❑ » FW- F- F- ~ F- O > W 22ETICDO ? F- - F- Q(kr' ^ I 3 ~ Q WF¢- w2SQ } ❑ ❑ XXXCoNW Od' W W XX2o _ 1..1. U 0 m0 m mZ (QUiV iD (n2 ¢ Q W W W � Ed' 2a 2' R' wwe- iD � a _ WO .- N C) < 0 O a r m 0 0 e- N Ce) V u) 0 t` CO 01 N N N N H Z 5G-2 e-es N N N N O = co N .+ O co co V CO Cn A C.) N p CO O V D) (T A W N 3 • 1) L m -, mm = = v � 73ZZmmm > D = vi02NCICnzai m o CD O n - Oo, xxmm = OmyNxXx0a < D - - m -Am > v O` CO 15 J S 73 m mMM m < 0 m m m c C � � X m � m m D 3 z m G nmzzOOmmz zzztntn0C) DZQ, Cn y < 0 r m vvmmoX �, rrvvv � � c � � c) T � Do m z m z Z T X X X X 0 • m D m En( ( 1 0 K WI Z K < > O = D =, I zmcnv, v, CnO • x m = = Dmm vA G7 m m < A � � 71� � � DD � OrA v r) < � AmDOD ° D 1�f, y ADS O m • CO N -AZpmcczr � mm _ = Dv, mnoT0, wm0 3 < 'iZZ y Z mpxxrrm � DZDn73 = r = OCrrv=rvx * 0 , m -iZ O i � u, mmmm X m � � vvm Now - D -�1 { CO m * m3 -Ci D O vm � � mOmZ � CO zDn � � Q° �_ co to m rn< z r N r m m X n m x m m m z C 0 < 0 0 > 3 � i Po co zm � y D * 1 Zm m 0 O aa > Z m z { mn T , m X L. H 73PO v CO -4 —I0 vv r O z Ill Jm N m O Cl) 7 m o co w p w m Cn r r r r r Z mr�nr1m r r r rr�1m�n (A rC!) N 0Cn r = A Z < m m m m m m D D D m m m m D D < m < < Z -< m 1 Cl)A a ha w o A r O Co .-4 CaO 0, 7( Z is., _, (.J Cn - CD Ca) W O Co 0 NJ O - 0) Co 0) IJ Cn Cn A 0 A 0) CO CT Cn O O CO CO Cn O co T, 1D T 710 D _v c~ y 0 4..) N CDj Ana N -, NJCJ A Z Z co 0) -4 OD 0) W C) NJCD N Co -4CJ C.) Cn Cn A CA Cn Cn 0) O) O CDO 0 O A O 0) cal O O C) C.) OD W 0 t.3 A m �1 m 0 m to CD 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 m O O (0 O N 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CM O Cn O 2 I. v Co CO O (n -o < > 73 W En EA EA En EA to,EA 44 to EA 0 4t 4 Co' ch " W O CO EA EA El la to EA EA EA to EA EA EA A Co A V A N mA CD 0 C CO W N Cn O co N O N co N [0 N A A Cn C4 Co m W N O CO CO O O A O O O N N 0) CO CT Cn W A O N r m Of O V V V A CO O 0 N O O N Cn 0 CT Cn O A CO CO O Cn A Co -` Q, O (T O O O O O O Cn O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N A O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 Co Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mi 0 j DTD =c>v,00 O v C X 0, m a z Z m � mC nz 0 m a o, • Ny m 0 r, ` 0 o m 0o )A Cl) CO)1 to CA EA EA EA CA EA EA EA CA EA EA CA CA EA EA fA EA fA to 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 C)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � O O CD CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 13 v C X p m a m -4 mn) 1. Z El Ny m 0 a 0 N -i EA EA EA CA EA fA EA EA EA EA EA EA M EA EA EA CA EA d,EA EA EA fA EA '^ CI CD p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 V, O C 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I -._ " ( m = OF a -1z � am m m nZ tv 116- a3 0 N H ` m o ` N a 0 6 0 Cn -4 N 69 EA to,CA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA to EA EA EA o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager { FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for the construction of a second five million gallon ground storage tank at Pearson Lane and F.M. 1709 Background Due the recent water supply situation, it has been requested that the second five million gallon ground storage tank at Pearson Lane and F.M. 1709 programmed for future construction be moved up in priority. Previously, this project was anticipated to be constructed beyond the current five year capital improvements plan. Staff can re-prioritize next year's plan to accommodate the construction of a second tank, which can be discussed more in-depth during the budget work sessions. This proposed second tank at pump station no. 1 and the five million gallon storage tank on T.W. King will increase the City's storage capacity substantially and provide a buffer for emergencies during peak water usage. Until the proposed "loop" (30-36 inch from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114) is complete (staff's goal is summer of FY 2000) extreme dry weather, which causes large "peak" days, could require that water usage need to be controlled. However, emergency conditions created by the problems in Ft. Worth and with the Tarrant Water Supply District can not be anticipated. By constructing the additional ground storage in FY 1999, Southlake will be better able to manage short-term emergency situations. If Council approves the second five million gallon ground storage tank at Pearson, the City will have an additional 11.5 million gallons in storage for 1999, versus 1998, consisting of five million gallons at Pearson, five million gallons at T.W. King and 1.5 million in the proposed Miron elevated tank. The estimated cost of the proposed tank is $1,687,400. This cost includes the tank, grading, fencing, additional pipe, and some engineering. Most of the engineering and the site plan are complete since the proposed tank is essentially the same as the existing tank. The proposed timeline for this project upon approval is: Aug. 20, 23, 27 - advertise for bids; Sept. 8 - open bids; Sept. 15 —present bids to Council; Oct. 15 —begin construction; June 1, 1999 —project completion. (re 5H-1 Recommendation Staff recommends Council authorize advertisement for bids for the construction of a second five million gallon ground storage tank at Pearson and F.M. 1709. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre L L 5H-2 I City of Southtake, Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 L TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of bid to ASC Pavement Markings, Inc. for the striping of Byron Nelson Parkway and Southridge Lakes Parkway and the widening of a portion of Byron Nelson Parkway Background Due to the phasing of the development around Byron Nelson Pkwy, striping of the street has not been possible until now. Southridge Lakes Parkway is included in the bid as it is more cost effective to do both streets as part of one contract. The proposed striping will provide more distinguishable driving lanes along the four-lane portions of Byron Nelson Pkwy and Southridge Lakes Pkwy. This, in turn, would provide safer driving conditions on both streets. Currently, the divided section of Byron Nelson transitions to an undivided section south of Northwood Trail. Additionally, at this transition, there exists a curve in the roadway with a radius that apparently is not adequate for the speed motorists are traveling. The proposed pavement widening will provide a larger curve radius at the transition. Funding in the amount of $65,000 is provided in the CIP budget for the aforementioned projects. The low and only bidder for this project is ASC Pavement Markings, Inc. The bid was for the amount of $74,163. It appears that there was a lack of interest from the contractors to bid this project due to either the small size of this project or the current workload of construction contractors. Consequently, the construction prices have risen since the cost estimate was prepared due to the high demand for construction projects. Recommendation Staff recommends Council award the bid for the striping of Byron Nelson Pkwy. and Southridge Lakes Pkwy. and the widening of a portion of Byron Nelson Pkwy. to ASC Pavement Markings, Inc. in the amount of$74,163. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre Attachmen t: Bid Tabulation 51-1 • V` I- LL 0 0 F- W �- 0 W z � CO I a r N O co 00 0 a) 0 • O ZI ~ w O W 000000000000 0 00000 0 0 Q 000000000000 0 O en H cc; CD CD 0 0 0 4 N 4 4 O CCi O O N O O CA ei O M OfJ 4 4 N O .- N. 1A 1A 00 CO C) Q C) 0 N 0 CD ['� 0 •N CD (D (n t0 C� Vf O N C CO c. CO 6 N N. co N N (H r) N O Cn r ,17 n 7 O Q N N r1 7 Vf tH N V! CH e H < Z IX N V V! M9 to V! NK! fA �! f/9 O. W I— W ? Q CA CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 cc cc OOOOOOtno0oo0 _ Z W o O CAD N u 0 Qz •• Otli 1_- V vriNc000 ,- vvv - 0 m a W Z Z Z N v U CC o CC k p a Q • N N. CO C7 1- N-- 0 CO CO N M CD N N CD N z CAI CO N C) N N (,) r) r) CO CO gI- as F- I1 C1 C1 lL Q a u4 a a a Q Q LL } } } } D J J J J W W J W W W W W J Cn u) u) U Fi = Y 00 I- ~ W N O 0 Z 0 0 0 a O 0 z Z O .— m ►- zcn WW W h _ z Z U Z 2 co cc ct2C z = WO aa - 0z _ � � am n EC Q =0 NN w H m n w W n ~ 0 � t cc QI- I- w Ovwwm J = > Q — Q0 � LLU) � °a zCO 02 0u) u) m � On � � wzQ QF- J -a O � Q W zz ZQ2J � Ftnzx � f- 2• mz mom ✓ W 0 - � x3 � mm �ow = 3 � 0000 � 0 O 0 mUVW � N z1- a � � Q. Y w zm aw } w3Qo222O 0 a m ci • a m m200 � 0gg , 00 C J w m a co N N 0 zwmz } ~ w Q0 0 nz a N 0 W � u0 Ca d gea re_ 0 Cn0Z0- 0- dZ 3 � ax � Q o U Ja Q Q Co NH Q F- F- F- f- Q ) Z LL } w a / I-- aw Qw U U Q CO p aza zn = a6 < ¢ ¢ QQQQQQz Q 0w Oi- � I- F- I-- F- F- f- f- I- I- 0 Q 0m > wJ0CL Q Z > — z2 a N } LLU � QC9 O } a I • mJ Na NV) (J) V) (/) V) (I) u) U) uuin NzzzzzzzzzzzW Owo00W N a UV _ a w -I ej w = — W O We2 oae) e) e2e W i- n o aW eitiiv Z n J 0I- zmmmmcncncnCOCOU) CO w z � -IJa Q F" Z = 2 cr oOz � � � � � casa a UUaar � mU Aio p cop 'i� cemY » » » » » 7 � mwu wwwu wwu wwd QO � mc00ZZD a. (114111r 2 W O — N C)I 4 CA CD N. co Q) - , N r1 In 51-2 City of Southlake,Texas r, M • MORANDUM August 12, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-59, Reinstating 180-Day Moratorium on Sexually Oriented Businesses Attached is Resolution No. 98-59 which would reinstate the moratorium on sexually oriented businesses until February 13, 1999 for an additional 180 days. My work is progressing on the required study, but due to a heavy workload of ordinance revisions, I have not been able to complete the study and process the necessary ordinance revisions. I hope to have the study and ordinances on the Commission's agenda for their December meetings. Should you have questions regarding any of the above, please call me at (817) 481-5581, extension 743. KPG L:\Cfl OCCS\ORD\DRAFI\TONMG\SOBEXT2.W PD 6-J- 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98-59 A RESOLUTION EXTENDING A MORATORIUM FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DAYS ON THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES FOR THE OPERATION OF SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES PENDING THE STUDY, REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS REGARDING SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 1, 1987, the City Council of the City of Southlake adopted Ordinance No. 399 regulating operation of sexually oriented businesses within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake believes that it will take several months to develop sufficient information to determine whether it is appropriate to amend Ordinance No. 399 and Ordinance No. 480 regarding permitted locations for (re the operation of sexually oriented businesses; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake believes that it is necessary and appropriate to institute temporary limitations on the issuance of licenses to operate a sexually oriented business for a limited period of time to provide the city with the opportunity to complete its study and review; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to maintain the status quo within the city until such time as the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have had a reasonable opportunity to study, discuss, review, and take appropriate action as may be required to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council on 11-04-97 adopted a one hundred and eighty (180) day moratorium on the issuance of licenses to operate a sexually oriented business as a throw' minimally intrusive method of maintaining the status quo until such review could be completed; and p , sJ-a Resolution No. 98-59 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council on 04-21-98 extended the moratorium for an additional ninety-three (93) days on the issuance of licenses to operate a sexually oriented business as a minimally intrusive method of maintaining the status quo until such review could be completed; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the moratorium should be reinstituted for one hundred eight (180) days in order to complete the study and to allow the Planning and Zoning Commission sufficient time to complete its review and recommendation to the City Council and to allow City Council time to review and take appropriate action; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. There is hereby declared an additional one hundred eighty (180) day moratorium, effective upon approval of this Resolution, on the issuance of all licenses for the operation of a sexually oriented business within the City of Southlake. Furthermore, no application for a license, certificate of occupancy or building permit shall be accepted and no license, certificate of occupancy or building permit shall be issued for the use of or the construction, repair or renovation of any structure or land for the operation of a sexually oriented business. SECTION 2. Any person who believes that the moratorium established by this Resolution unreasonably and unnecessarily impacts his property shall have the right to request a variance to the provisions of this moratorium from the City Council. A person seeking a variance shall make a written request to the City Council by submitting it to the City Secretary's office. The request must provide the following information: tar, S3-3 Resolution No. 98-59 Page 3 a. A description of the property to be covered by the variance. b. An explanation as to why the application of the moratorium is unreasonable as applied to the applicant's property. c. A description of any negative impacts created by the moratorium provision. The City Secretary's office shall place the request for a variance on the agenda of the City Council for consideration at a public meeting. The applicant shall receive written notice of the date of the proposed hearing on the variance request. The City staff shall not be required to provide written notice of the variance request to any other individual or entity. On the date that the item is set for hearing, the City Council shall - conduct a public hearing on the variance request giving any individual who desires to present information or evidence to the Council on the appropriateness or inappropriateness of the variance the opportunity to appear before the Council and present such information. At the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council, by majority vote, may approve rove a variance to the provisions of this moratorium resolution or may deny the request for variance. The approval of a variance shall entitle the applicant to proceed through the normal permitting process for the property to which the variance has been granted. SECTION 3. This moratorium shall be considered in full force and effect upon passage of this Resolution and for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of its approval unless terminated prior to that time by action of the City Council upon final adoption of an amendment, if determined appropriate and necessary, to Ordinance No. 399 and Ordinance No. 480 regarding permitted locations for the operation of sexually oriented businesses. This moratorium shall automatically expire on February 13, 1999 unless it is specifically extended by additional City Council action. . Resolution No. 98-59 Page 4 C SECTION 4. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF 1998. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: - Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary C L 5(3-S City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 13, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Interim Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Award of bid for Bid Package #2 (courts) for Bicentennial Park Expansion Phase II On Monday, August 10, 1998, bids were opened for Bid Package #2 (construction of courts) for Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase II. The courts included in the base bid are: • (12) tennis courts, • (1) center tennis court, • (1) in-line hockey court, and • (3) basketball courts. Since the SPDC budget did not include construction of all of the courts planned for Phase II, deductive alternates were included in the bid specifications. These alternates allowed deduction of basketball court(s), pairs of tennis courts, the center tennis court, and/or substitution of galvanized finish chain link fence in lieu of the vinyl coated fencing. The SPDC budgeted amount of$757,962 includes construction of: • in-line hockey rink and lighting ($244,150), • (2) basketball courts ($80,938), and • (8) tennis courts, lighting, and sidewalks ($432,875). MESA has prepared bid tabulations for three scenarios. These are shown in tabular form on the attached sheets. Option 1: The base bid, which includes construction of all courts Option 2: Base bid less (1) basketball court, (2) pair of tennis courts, and the center tennis court. This is the SPDC budgeted package. Option 3: Base bid less (1) basketball court and (2) pair of tennis courts. This option would reduce the number of courts constructed to nine, allowing construction of the center tennis court. Note that the choice of alternates, if any, may change the apparent low bidder. Bid Package #2 also does not include windscreens, which we had informed SPDC we were investigating as a contracted maintenance agreement, rather than including in the bid package. The estimated cost for windscreens under this arrangement would be approximately $16,000 installed. Curtis E. Hawk Award of bid for Bid Package #2 August 13, 1998 Page 2 If Option #1 is accepted, the total construction cost for Phase II courts and lighting would be $1,143,300 (bid package #2 and #2a less $85,000 for lighting of ballfields #1 and #3) for construction of all courts and lighting planned for Phase II. Bid package #2 would be awarded to American Tennis Court Contractors for court construction at a cost of$851,019. No alternates would be accepted. Bid package #2a would be awarded to NEMA 3 Electric for lighting at a bid of$377,281. If Option#2 is accepted, the total construction cost for Phase II courts and lighting would be $881,503 (bid package #2 and #2a less $85,000 for lighting of ballfields #1 and #3) for construction of the courts and lighting as specified in the current SPDC budget. Bid package #2 would be awarded to Dean Construction in the amount of$654,800, accepting alternate #1 -- deduction of(1) basketball court, alternate #2 -- deduction of(2) pair of tennis courts, and accepting alternate #3 -- deduction of center tennis court. Bid package #2a would be awarded to NEMA 3 Electric in the amount of$311,703, accepting alternate #1 -- deduction of center tennis court lighting, and alternate #2 -- deduction of(2) pair of tennis court lighting. (10, the total construction cost for Phase II courts and lighting If Option #3 is accepted, g g would be $979,281 (bid package #2 and#2a less $85,000 for lighting of ballfields #1 and #3) for construction of the SPDC budgeted courts plus the center tennis court. Bid package #2 would be awarded to American Tennis Court Contractors in the amount of$733,422, accepting alternate #1 -- deduction of(1) basketball court, and alternate #2 -- deduction of(2) pair of tennis courts. Bid package #2a would be awarded to NEMA 3 Electric in the amount of $330,859, accepting alternate #2 -- deduction of(2) pair of tennis court lighting. Staff requests you place this item on the August 17 SPDC agenda and the August 18 City Council agenda for their consideration. Please contact me or Park Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry if you have any further questions. KH Attachments: Comparison of Options in Tabular Format MESA Bid tabulation sheets, including tabulations of options OPTION #1 (All courts and Lighting for Hockey and Tennis Courts) Bid Package#2 $ 851,019 American Tennis Bid package#2a $ 377,281 NEMA 3 less Ballfields#1 and #3 $ (85,000) TOTAL OPTION #2 (SPDC budgeted number of courts and associated lighting) Bid Package#2 $ 907,800 Alt#1(deduct(1)baskteball court) $ (24,000) Alt#2 (deduct(2)pairs of tennis courts) $ (130,000) Alt#3 (deduct center tennis court) $ (99,000) Subtotal $ 654,800 Dean Construction Bid Package#2a $ 377,281 Alt#1 (deduct center tennis ct lighting) $ (19,156) Alt#2 (deduct(2) pairs tennis ct lighting) $ (46,422) Subtotal $ 311,703 NEMA 3 Less ballfields#1 and#3 $ (85,000) TOTAL OPTION #3 (SPDC budgeted number of courts adding back center tennis court) Bid Package#2 $ 851,019 Alt#1(deduct(1)baskteball court) $ (24,000) Alt#2 (deduct(2) pairs of tennis courts) $ (130,000) Subtotal $ 697,019 American Tennis Bid Package#2a $ 377,281 Alt#2 (deduct(2) pairs tennis ct lighting) $ (46,422) Subtotal $ 330,859 NEMA 3 Less ballfields#1 and#3 $ (85,000) TOTAL • L e :7 r 4 Q2 $ S 8 8 o % ` M cb S Fr 8 8 8 e 8 dNh .p Or . a e e cal gr 8" 8 g g 8wi 53 8 s § - 8 _ � $ I. !V V O N�ea Fos N tim 1. z 8 �� $ " x • ' c . . .. , .. ,., _� iss o Oi $ S $ gcco Un ' f v N V1 a G C tv § $ 1 _ a N1 �0 �O N �+1 .n.. •A� ill ',w` 01 ..O m ek N O g A r p p ; 13 . M 00 I � pC -OC C �. $ o o C O O r a l! i O C O O O m [; 8 8 8 8 F $ Y _AI. a 5 • VI v N r Qs rs ..J es I aa. v11 0 dliii Ow in N fF�1 r Pf Pat eri i 4 pi - .66 in it A 3 0► F d in— `r ......."...,, t. . ta Q _u 4 • G O e O� 42 u W p j$� Fv C g e C $ ae m u C t� o pr. rg O > $ �YA.� AL y i Z 'eC E m 'u •� Y ZS .] 1 a3Jo 2 0 7 Gl u V 0 CD t Oe. p C3 _ N C C O J O OTO .. e V ik A sk ` C �g ' 8 r n N �+f D ll1iIiIi # ifluI uC Rco- Yo ++ cihne-1. . < �S mmmao co al Ts t, - N 1N ♦ v1 41 h m r • Zeta iEi 'ON �' 20:Li 86iiii0i • .. • , .. 8 " $ 5 o s s a a 8 a 1 i a a 8 g �X : 8 o °+1 2 3 H '' a N N pi '? .' X h X a +.r M g M h s IR 1 .r s $` $ S s a _ N b :se hi a 1 el ill gl. as �a "11 cc ,f V a HN v• N i. wi i to mtit ^ v i Y! M --, up Ul ii N I 8 8 8 84 i a 8 S $ g IA A i _. ._ r• ;:t i i _ J R " Z Z ' s $ 2 $= 8 g Qs $$ o a,g s s ga `' 2 g 2 �! o 0 3 v o c v i oWO R CA oft U U ....0 .� • { € 3 e 5 5 e ao ri Qp 5- S NL I. a 411 w h O P ; h O .. • N gO M '• N V „j N 4 N �j U � h 16 WI of 1g 4 a. d o $ g S GI o a al o g a u g p gg • g o Qg a he to F .r a in Q • 13 A a fei o la o $ a .. 0 o F. = N ii lNl N n N 9 E" ^ 0 a la o ,t e1 6e re oR gi tv 2 r u CO w O E 8 o 2 At C x A p� Y ..f C .A p ` 3 J # YtJ j k ,,,.. 2 . . . .. . . 4 tr. : as a zi ... 8 , , TO /� 0 = 1-3 e ' 1 g • '�^ pp t G� a v it C .ems f!4 ra 5 a e rim U �c a a `2 0 (sti ra le, if :in • qn• a Z • OQ EI E •4 ta E ^ a it Z a ' Ca a1 E ; < alV14% inG� Ooa0 sa < .. < � < 3 F •+ 0 4 CO < ▪ < !. N 0 — N ws V. ,/f vG Q — N 01 4 6,1 C PM I?I 'f1N Sic- ' 20: 86/11/0i --- -- . • . . L , .. • : ........ . g • .., .• 4 • . 1 ':.: 1 0.....ek !:. :. • I : '.;.. U 1 -5 .. I 4 I • . : . . c III .. 1 Vi 7:, :a . i . - a 8 • 1 # .. • 11 d Lt •: ,, - A — ...., ..., 2 a 4 I . . ea ...... re w ..., e4 a IA ...... .... 3 .3 • c — , i•-• 3 -4 me '- ? .. ..,4 . .. .8. 1 2 . 0 z e et 0 7; , vi c - = ;.. •c ; 3 5 lit et ta cs sIS M 2 §. - as ..... e.4 t ea en 3 li 4 A to 4; v .... 1 I I I AI ; 6 0 : ...... ..-... ,...., I F. us 8 8 8 g t ; u , . i- e II ria. ea 5 = to c 0 43 ILL., el a "I 4t >, 4, —. 11.1 .A at !; z .... 0 .. -- = 8 I = : ... i 1_, 18 - . : 0 i . ... " it. 3 T. I = 4' 1 .- • 0 Cr u 6.1... ...) fa 1 e g zu u.3 ea 41 0 6 a a re, 41e Z 1 .S Of a al :a fa ! 9 pa ii ..2 i 0 0 • .25 a g 41 4 im 01 6 c 0 re a 4S 4.;:ma :0° 8. !....t5 # g re ;BEBE m ma all (60 .. 17 • 0 z e .2 E 'a, •E, . 6s-: cc 2 2 1...• ! S b.42 2 ... 2 * 2 .2: * -It * u5 7.7 13 a . Tion) so :a 7e 5 < z. e f .— 01 co CR a ri re a ea 2 c c a V co COM T 7T •flkl ZO:LT 86/TTAIT . . 1. , •,:„. L 1 I' ,, 'f - .. • • .[ i i I , . _ L.A s s g s 3 : s a ' N 4. t `► a en ae ,,i ,, .s. 2 s g g � I o i 1 g $ g g 4 it co. az 8 8 $ a a W e E a a 0 lip m • r N go " W lV ''4. o y ~ A ~ Mom! H h ps P. ^ M a i .... z "R • a Y .O mPp a b ' DI 31 v, aA or $ a � M a I Li- 1 j N C is D. r jj ' 7 .4 : M IN O O r �. F : m3 4m8a .- a < 2 < 2 V h QmV34 a < .N. 3 a F� c 4 er O tilt-' tot + v�, F. er .n d 1 of j mm • • sea 'I n 'ON vO:Lt 864ti01 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 13, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Interim Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Award of bid for Bid Package #2a (lighting) for Bicentennial Park Expansion Phase II On Monday, August 10, 1998, bids were opened for Bid Package #2a (lighting) for Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase II. This bid package included lighting of the tennis courts and the in-line hockey court specified in bid package #2, as well as lighting of Bicentennial Park ballfields #1 and #3. Ballfields #1 and #3 were included in this package to attempt to take advantage of unit cost savings associated with a larger construction package. Since the SPDC budget did not include construction of all of the courts planned for Phase II, deductive alternates were included in the bid specifications. These alternates allowed deduction of lighting for the center tennis court and/or deduction of lighting for one or more pair of tennis courts. The SPDC budget of$757,962 is for construction of the in-line hockey rink, (2) basketball courts, and (8) tennis courts. Lighting and sidewalks for the courts was also included in this budgeted figure. MESA has prepared bid tabulations for three scenarios: Option 1: The base bid, which includes construction of all courts Option 2: Base bid less (1) basketball court, (2) pair of tennis courts, and the center tennis court. This is the SPDC budgeted package. Option 3: Base bid less (1) basketball court and (2) pair of tennis courts. This option would reduce the number of courts constructed to nine, allowing construction of the center tennis court. If Option #1 is accepted, the total construction cost for Phase II courts and lighting would be $1,143,300 (bid package #2 and #2a less $85,000 for lighting of ballfields #1 and #3) for construction of all courts and lighting planned for Phase II. Bid package #2 would be awarded to American Tennis Court Contractors for court construction at a cost of$851,019. No alternates would be accepted. Bid package #2a would be awarded to NEMA 3 Electric for lighting at a bid of$377,281. 1 Curtis E. Hawk Award of bid for Bid Package #2a (lighting) August 13, 1998 Page 2 If Option #2 is accepted, the total construction cost for Phase II courts and lighting would be $881,503 (bid package #2 and #2a less $85,000 for lighting of ballfields #1 and #3) for construction of the courts and lighting as specified in the current SPDC budget. Bid package #2 would be awarded to Dean Construction in the amount of$654,800, accepting alternate #1 -- deduction of(1) basketball court, alternate #2 -- deduction of(2) pair of tennis courts, and accepting alternate #3 -- deduction of center tennis court. Bid package #2a would be awarded to NEMA 3 Electric in the amount of$311,703, accepting alternate #1 -- deduction of center tennis court lighting, and alternate #2 -- deduction of(2) pair of tennis court lighting. If Option #3 is accepted, the total construction cost for Phase II courts and lighting would be $979,281 (bid package #2 and #2a less $85,000 for lighting of ballfields #1 and #3) for construction of the SPDC budgeted courts plus the center tennis court. Bid package #2 would be awarded to American Tennis Court Contractors in the amount of$733,422, accepting alternate #1 -- deduction of(1) basketball court, and alternate #2 -- deduction of(2) pair of tennis courts. Bid package #2a would be awarded to NEMA 3 Electric in the amount of $330,859, accepting alternate #2 -- deduction of(2) pair of tennis court lighting. Staff requests you place this item on the August 17 SPDC agenda and the August 18 City Council agenda for their consideration. Please contact me or Park Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry if you have any further questions. Gv� KH Attachments: Comparison of Options in Tabular Format MESA Bid tabulation sheets, including tabulations of options (kr 5L -a OPTION #1 (All courts and Lighting for Hockey and Tennis Courts) L Bid Package#2 $ 85 1,019 019 American Tennis Bid package#2a $ 377,281 NEMA 3 less Ballfields#1 and#3 $ (85,000) TOTAL OPTION #2 (SPDC budgeted number of courts and associated lighting) Bid Package#2 $ 907,800 Alt#1(deduct(1)baskteball court) $ (24,000) Alt#2 (deduct(2) pairs of tennis courts) $ (130,000) Alt#3 (deduct center tennis court) $ (99,000) Subtotal $ 654,800 Dean Construction Bid Package#2a $ 377,281 Alt#1 (deduct center tennis ct lighting) $ (19,156) Alt#2 (deduct(2)pairs tennis ct lighting) $ (46,422) Subtotal $ 311,703 NEMA 3 Less ballfields#1 and#3 $ (85,000) TOTAL ._ , OPTION #3 (SPDC budgeted number of courts adding back center tennis court) Bid Package#2 $ 851,019 Alt#1(deduct(1) baskteball court) $ (24,000) Alt#2 (deduct(2)pairs of tennis courts) $ (130,000) Subtotal $ 697,019 American Tennis Bid Package#2a $ 377,281 Alt#2 (deduct(2)pairs tennis ct lighting) $ (46,422) Subtotal $ 330,859 NEMA 3 Less ballfields#1 and#3 $ (85,000) TOTAL JL - 3 r L r r w 1 o c o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o O 'I me c c o 0 o a8 g ,4.. O O w cr 3 N N 41 Si. O N - C c an .r v ....2 `� IA a� < H • t + O ; O O O O O 0 I { _ ea Letri . N s N O v '" N h In �O O OC C AJ la M 01 m N1 en M .V 14 IAEQ. ,t. O 8 O O 8 8 8 hi_ F en To to 1. �� 8 S S o 8 a5 -- ci ti h c uE b o K N m e, N H E I.i S ; E- 442 IA (A no g m eumM . 2 0 0 0 0QQ o 0 o 8 •0 o . , $ f g oa5 S $ $ $ g - 41 « c ' O 4 N oG enm • (� K H H in .4 �• C Q • C N (iimocliK O - e . oa a a a a o 0 o $'E a .� n Ci N O O O O a p 0 _ N Orr O O O '�= O G t F 4 m C41 ml ,O NZ en .a en ta r... •0 1 ••v 3 0 ..AA U ow �H..n N IA 'v H A I _€ c c z 3 �C 0. C _ G d ! o 0 0 0 0 o S. g ea 73 � � � �. O O o o o c a w u TA so a OD. et et v, O 9. a, ,o L+ p (� H v M N M N q C x J �- E a 4 g. t• A u O " u a V ci {✓f N Y O.w. V (.... 11is- -. N en (jam8 taCT p .O , Cen N 0= f r p ri C C pt P O O O v1 ey, '"' �^,� Cy -- �: p 4 m uftt IA v �xj w ~ 3 y v `e It u 5 C a u u e m 0 . -� F6o` � gd _ en �y • It Z _ k k It. u 1 F9. a I.Y y w 3 - . a V, '� 'gyp ,V A Y arize Y1 �W • O O e �a . g a ` w a C `am ac u p m /1 N "� `n J sell y . . Y �r a+ a, u o E u 3 a -'� u II !: qCEE 6E Y m 15 .� Cmp y rC Y E` 05 (40:, r3 * Za. 6 E 4 iC U Zia' ID of < .72,� Qr. < _+ S u < Zv •• G� COm W C7Q1 e N et a •c. N 8 iii z06 iZi 'ON �L ZO:Li 86iiii0i .. L , 11 .._ ....._ 0 i 0 0 0 0 g 0 • o 0 o Pi re I V C V a g o o �= I °� o o vi M O. N 3 N M O� el N 'j 3 ..! v N 40 3 v n ,i 441 N y 'g N H C e O ^ ^ e d O 8 4 O $ O V c ea _ at Oro e-i Cl 6 W N N N re a w h v M t� eN .r G it N 41. M ea v et No. 00 N N. OD M O N N v H,,. w v lA t N N o $ .a 8 c S $e p §' 5 �p _ o p$ p$ 3 ,1 O C •�'100 0. N u „ N W at 11 ro} 'Q41. W 4 v v N W H w M • p N ~.• M y Z Z 1 4 o Q o o^ O^ do 0 0 $ t S G o 8 QQ $ e $ g e t N pOeg� n' r d p. as I O & O a N ONO 3 g Q4 N N ONO t en do 01 O 1 C LIN ,: O F eo aTo on $Cca SI o o e O oa $ ^C 0,o 0164 Na te 2 & M ^RR a " :� V Ny y. r VIU envTA' NI ,,,, t I a. .- a. a. o oft p S o $ 0 8 O 0 G O dO n u eOo Oy $ S T p O QAl•y T' IU a � phO N 44 M dr N N U " N U y e ` ws P c. F,l y C� W Pf C d O O42 O • PO A nO 4 E c u p NI N n ,,O O G M N e F � N = et E ... ti -C N "' . IA IAyH.. M 3W � N 0 7t1 i E vs "' otti aO a a 2u uE a aC W ., ft $ 5 a ao 0. u ffj� 4 o'd�,' a o'� u ,, �'� �' c a.a a t s , # _ �l ` a Ai A. "' ii a a o . c $ 4 �a 'u u .1, I... A it , a 4 0 11 1Yi-- 115 Y a t o 0 t p; a m n 0 $ 0 0 0° . a p,m o C. C Q o Q' eaa O $ ° � . as . a r S w e a . O0 ci 4k - a .- v Go y G 40 a .O p Sy ii (or 4 To '0 l Q X .�. 'a = p 0. C m Cj ro ao Gi O W U a0 A < < < 2 3 . ... a0 t.1 co oa is < : < . I- 9 8 Cl 0 ` N M ./1 .D 0 .... A N M V v1 _ - m \X -� van IF.i 'ON £O:Lt 86iiii01 • L . .• • ..• ..... Li• • g . - 8 Li•. "0• X•. •• .• • ,. out. ' Co..! 3 3 .• -02 3 eil a. na : .. - . a I 2 .b. ex. 1 • • ••.. 8 sir ....: . a 3 12 — -0 a e c 0.• 0 V C ea a Q --• " : • --- .• :• ..c g .1 . • Er 00 ii • • • 5 7.-. .• • 3.:7. . -F • — 2 c •. . .. ., 2. /1 444 (11101 • ct a er ... o 9 o o o 8 a a a a -its "El cl. c3 g 1 u !....• .... = :t. 3 = .g N : . x 4., ...„ - e.a 110 410 C ••• - 24.w •" .2 2 s . . ..--il .. ,:. u . ....... . ...... ......, CD CD ra ::a 3 = ... = N.. .E e; ao at q 0 o ci go c ..6 4 PL• ,: 514 ;74 f0.1 Oa ig rAi a s. Gi. %I • § t 1 ...I VI v v e . c.• a , - 0 e 0..4 op 2 E ... ...,, ....., I .. c tl•••• ..• , ... ro' 8 .6 en 8 8 g :,--• -§.-:: .--. ty Zr, .t = -g, co :i. al ei ei v. A en ea c g 5 ,,-g % u 45. :! el v. — IN in m .i. IL, g Of 60 IA ...-• v t)1 , a+ Z .... o or .... a 1..., .*.. ni o .t° t, ... 9: 0 : .-, 40 ;.: i 12., e :: r. , g,. . ... .. ,.... r. .. 0 t t P $ , A . a sh . 0 ii te 4. u • 41 s 0 Q r. - .9..2 =b° 0.— - r re* a Q 7 <a -a ; cil ca ia co i 2 . 6 ..c.— . IP • g a-* ° C.) 7 t '''' k• 7 i f-. 4[ °' C = • u ...• <V rot iU C CI ie. as Is 8 '--cl g Te FnEge • :. en To ‘11114 •: 17 Te, 8 • .9 a v f co ci co co :j 7i g :lc • co co co 'co 2 c as u di• _ - ,,...5.. :,' 20:2.,T 86,'IT/OT 2061 'ET 'ON .‘.. LH ,, i` 't 1 , _ . ... k f ,. ' a O o o S Oe 8^ O ir VP L' i ,, _ k, , A b m 8 o 0 0 e p o S u al S` a °O wr s in E a r .. IA ina t�it' 4. _ _ 3 ta p p ' e Oso S 8 •Y O N • f~ p Y m la n Ah n a e aLD n �. 6 s 1� N en f• :.KKKC t_3 .0 w.l Y� v• y r v aGV Y f in biz EzY n Vr 9. t <_ _ m Y o m b O m a 2 .. a � � Y � �, � � p 0 ea aS o a he 0. 1 Lr I C Y .a 0 6 3 C a Y AS Y Ti d V 0 0 < i 5 ' 2 < 1.4 : ga � � o � ` a � Z< O . r. ac 1111114. Gd O G O r = p7p 'd Y �Q .t - Ia o se itt HA! � a 2 �CRp a. '- CV 0 ev .+` a .n 1 -- ev en d m SO6 'ET 'ON ,_57_. - 7 VO:LT 86'Tii0T City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 12, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Interim Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Award of bid for 100 GPM deep water well and well pump at Bob Jones Park On Thursday, August 13, 1998, bids were opened for water well drilling at Bob Jones Park. This water well will serve to replenish the existing pond. As you recall, this pond was intended as a water source for irrigation of the soccer fields, and to maintain fish life for recreational fishing activities. In addition, the design of the pavilion and boardwalk are based on a constant water level in the pond. Staff and the engineering consultant for the project evaluated existing water wells on the property and determined that they were unsuitable for park needs. In July, SPDC and City Council authorized staff to seek bids for drilling of a new water well. The bid specifications were prepared for a single, 14-3/4" well, providing 100 gallons per thme,minute. Cheatham and Associates evaluated the option of using multiple, smaller diameter wells to achieve the same total flow, but opted for the single well instead. This was based on the additional cost per well for discharge piping, fence protection, electrical needs and gravel parking/work pad area. Also, each well would need to be spaced at least 400 feet apart. Only two bids were submitted for the water well drilling. We believe some companies did not bid due to the high demand for water well drilling during this drought period. Note that the low bidder took exception to the required 90-day completion period. Staff plans to meet with the Grapevine-Southlake Soccer Association president before Monday's meeting to discuss field availability. Based on our discussions with him, staff may recommend rejection of all bids and authorization to re-bid with a longer time period, hoping to attract more bidders that may have not bid due to this requirement. Note also that this item was not included in the budget adopted by SPDC for Bob Jones construction. Staff requests you place this item on the August 17 SPDC agenda and the August 18 City Council agenda for consideration. Please contact me or Park Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry if you have any further questions. KH Attachments: Bid tabulation sheet -- Bob Jones Park Irrigation Aug-13-98 04:35P P.01 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES August 13. 1998 Mr. Ben Henry Parks and Recreation Dept. City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake,TX 76092 Re: City of Southake Recommendations for Award 100 GPM Deep Water Well and Well Pump For Bob Jones Park Irrigation Public Bid Opening 08/13/98 Engineer's Project No.001-938A Dear Mr. Henry: As advertised,bids for the referenced project were received,opened and read publicly at 9:30 o'clock A.M.,August 13, 1998. Although J.L.Myers Co. bid the lowest dollar amount(S96,077.00), they bid a contract time of 180 days,instead of the 90 days indicated in the specifications. The second low bidder is: LJ.J. Biffic Water Well Drilling Box 70 Muenster,TX 76252 J.J. Billie hid the required 90 day contract time. We have checked the extensions and total and find the proposal to be in order. We recommend award of the contract to J.J. Biffle Water Well Drilling in the amount of S96,650.00. We will obtain and review references of this company prior to the SPDC meeting on Monday, August 17. We enclose a bid tabulation for your use. If we may be of further service in this matter,please advise. Yours Vcry Truly, ;72, N, Ron King, P.E. F\WORD\SOVTHLAK935-ANwalwct.avid.doc Enclosure: Bid Tabulation ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design,Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. •Suite 200•Arlington,Texas 76011 817/548-0696•Metro 265-8836•Fax 817/265-8532 Aug-13-98 O4:35P P.O2 • �� 8 88 8 8888888 r ,-4 U c l o — %. 0. 05W eel Ill /— 1j4§ so 0 a I 8 88 8 8888888 g h $$ $ ga8$ggg U Ilo le4-.2s0-: gE iL $ 8 88 8 888288$i2 0 - falstlag i v� a � y N 4 $ $ a a 0) W 88 8 8'8-2 8 8 8 O 1 g $ 8 88 8 88888�j 8 yo`� o Z I ^ A �' in qN a - NNe.lii40, W OCy,J 0me co - or N Ip Nm O yNMMM d >. 6 ).i% ooe (4 * NN . „ • Os. CO Q oy o_ 88W � $8888g8 war . a a .4 WN C4fG �Opi§ ���iii Na0 .—NN .-tm 8 '7 m C li W A N d O 1 . ► , H Vf V1 g li ti ti LL4 vj h1E II J J J —IJ J J J �y O 1 0 �� il 2 al z .., Q W b o a J'-� W/ W ~ .W W Z_ = O w iW- 4. E m V ?� J 4 H in � JO % Q Q i W W W • in m C wJN Z S Q. W Y y��� POI d omVsw W W fat ~ h- JJ V Z O� �S ow ' 0 yWF- ' < 7i. OS � tp > d'Q' 0 I—f O6601 h 0 U CO < ww b °C•tcWw 7 ~ ►-4 L7 a a 0 J 4 Q W w ma > oZi-- 0- o X rii.r W W G C � t=.1= uo g 8 ,,, ww oo wsl � N ,rNffufWf+ Q Ji72-3 xroM3a�s 1N3ra►ra 3BWN0o .9 — 313WNOo aNnoss 9Nllsm iMVGAdd xroM3ais 3B83N0o i 31 ONOo ,9 C I FE �S lz m 1NROsv3 ( 1N3W3SV3 All1LLn S3WI AMU 'Z I onsnd �i �Z j j mainOHS S3NV1 .*I-1 .4l-b H3ainoHs 0nHnd .0-.01 i .,9-.9 1 „0-,0l I i «0-,SZ «0-,Z 1 �O-.Z L «0-,SZ «0-.0 L .9-,9 l C p0-.o l JIVIVDIM 1kVlih)I21Vd I «0-,OZ .,0-,S£ .0-1t Z I «0-19£ I .0-10Z I .0-,OL I 10-.OL wnsn 'M'O'2I «0-,ot L 00£L• S69t.6019L SDxoj 'y} 00Z o31n$.DZDId IDUO40LU. S10H::>IN • 3S: 3snoH rn OO£L•! S68b•6019L SOXCI 'y} OOZ aj!nS.DZDld IDUOIIDUJO: S10HOIN • 3S: ONnM JNLLSD 3 �c Im rnr0a JNLLSIX3 .0—.Zz 3St10H OWL S69b•6019L GDxol 'i OOZ olmS.DzDld IDUOnDW SIOH�IN • 3S 1 N 31N N H 3 A00 lV O0l 31V I H d O H d —dV 3Hl AS NVId 3H1 d0 NOIldOOV IVNNOA WHIdNOO OI 031S3n03H 38V 'SH3d013AM ONV SINV lnSNOO 31VAIHd AIIVIOUS3'dVW SIHI NO NOIIVWHOdN13H1 d0 SH33n ivuN310d 'NOI1VIUOdSNVH1 01ISnd V SAVMHOIH d0 1N3W1tltld3O 31VIS 3H1 ONV :1NVHWVI 4 SVIIVO d0 S311Nn00 3H1 !NOSOHVHOIH ONV ONVId '311nOS3W'3111ASIM31 'ONIAHI '31HIVHd ONVHO 'ONVIHVV 'H1HOM IUOd 'SVIIVO 'N010NIlEiV d0 S31110 3H1 :030n1ON1 33111WW00 M31A3H NVId 3HVJH0nOHOH1 3H1 NO dlHSH3SP13W '30VId S3NV1 1N3WdOl3A3O ONVI SV AINO Hn000 II IM S3HVdH0nOHOH1 3Hl d0 ANVVI d0 NOuonH1SN00 1VH1 03ZIIV3H SI 11 'BWil NI 1NIOd 3Hnlnd 01L103dS V 01 031VI38 ION SI 11 3HOd3H3H1 ONV 'Y131SAS 3HVdH0nO8OHl 3H1 dWVW 0 1N3dOl3A30 31Illn 3H1 103Id3H OI O30N31NI SI 11 '13A31 IVNO1038 ONV A1Nn00 'IVOOI 3H1 IV IN31SISN00 SI 1VH1 NVId 3NO OINI SNVld 38VdH0nOHOH1 IVnOlA10Nl H13H1 31VNIO80O0 Ol S311Nn00 ONV 531110 03103ddV 3H1 d0 SIUOdd3 3H1 S103Id3H ONV'S1N3WNH3A00 dO 110Nn00 SVX31 IVHIN30 H1HON 3H1 d0 '33111YIW00 MMA38 NVId 3HVdH0nOHOH1 3H1 d0 N01103UI0 3H1 H30Nn 03HVd3Hd SVM NVId 3HVdH0nOHOH1 SIHl \/ 13SUI All) I MlU3) Hld0m ldoj DWI All) 1URU3) SUllUa "' City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shelli Siemer, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-58, Endorsing the petition for project improvements on U.S. 377, S.H. 114, and F.M. 1938 recommended by the Metroport Cities Partnership to the Texas Department of Transportation to be presented September 24, 1998 Attached is Resolution No. 98-58 which would endorse the petition for project improvements along the major roadways as recommended by the Metroport Cities Partnership. This resolution shows the support of the Metroport Cities' request to the Texas Transportation Commission to consider funding these improvements. The further pursuit of this funding request by the Metroport Cities Partnership is contingent upon the three Cities of Southlake, Keller and Westlake adopting resolutions in support of the project improvements. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 City Council Agenda for consideration. L 7g-/ City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 98-58 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ENDORSING THE PETITION FOR PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS ON U.S.377,S.H. 114 AND F.M. 1938 RECOMMENDED BY THE METROPORT CITIES PARTNERSHIP TO THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO BE PRESENTED SEPTEMBER 24, 1998. WHEREAS, State Highway 114 is a critical component of the Northwest Metroplex regional transportation system, serving the continually expanding residential communities and employment centers along the corridor between Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and Fort Worth Alliance Airport; and, WHEREAS,the Texas Transportation Commission, in response to the June 1996 delegation appearance of the METROPORT 114 Partnership committed over$57-million in Priority 1 Level of authority construction funding for portions of the SH 114 freeway program from SH 170 (Roanoke Bypass)now under construction to Dove Road and from Carroll School Road to FM 1709, and over$12-million in Priority II Level of authority for the SH 114 freeway program from Dove Road to Carroll School Road; and, CthrWHEREAS, the construction of freeway mainlanes and grade-separated interchanges ough the currently signalized portions of SH 114 from Dove Road to Carroll School Road, and from SH 114 Roanoke Bypass/114 Business/SH 170 to Precinct Line Road would complete the SH 114 freeway facility between FM 1709 and SH 170 and thereby greatly enhance through and local access mobility; and, WHEREAS,both FM 1938 and US 377 are major north-south arterials providing access to State Highway 114 for the surrounding communities,and are included in all area thoroughfare plans and designated in the North Central Texas Council of Governments Mobility 2010 20-year plan as Regional Arterials; and WHEREAS,both the proposed extension of FM 1938 from FM 1709 to State Highway 114 and the proposed widening of US 377 from FM 1709 to State Highway 114 would provide improved local access to State Highway 114, and would enhance the operations of the State Highway 114 freeway and the regional transportation system as a whole; NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That all matters stated in the preamble of this resolution are true and correct as if copied herein in their entirety. ' L Section 2. That the City of Southlake supports the METROPORT Cities' request to the 7/2- 1 City of Southlake,Texas Resolution No. 98-58 Page 2 Texas Transportation Commission for Priority I Level of Authority for the State Highway 114 freeway projects between Dove Road and Carroll School Road and between SH 114 Roanoke bypass/114 Business/SH 170 and Precinct Line Road, and Priority II Level of Authority for the designation and extension of FM 1938 from FM 1709 to State Highway 114;and Priority II Level of Authority for the widening of US 377 from FM 1709 to State Highway 114. Section 3. That the City of Southlake requests that the Texas Transportation Commission take all steps necessary to ensure the accelerated development of these strategic,critical improvements. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. Mayor Rick Stacy LATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: M:\WD-FILES\CEH\METROPOR\98-114\resolution-city.doc\KB .• 7,9-3 FM 1938 EXTENSION (law( SUMMARY OF QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Following is a summary of questions that have been raised regarding the potential extension of FM 1938 as it impacts Southlake. Keller and Westlake. The questions are generally organized by groups of similar topics. It is anticipated that this list will be updated frequently as new questions arise. Additional questions and/or answers can be added to this list by faxing them to 488-9370. MISCELLANEOUS ACRONYMS/DEFINITIONS: 1. TxDOT: Texas Department of Transportation 2. Right-of-Way: Abbreviated(R.O.W.), an area set aside for the construction of road driving lanes and installation of utilities. It is wider than the street width and includes areas called "parkways" between the edge of street pavement and the R.O.W. line. The R.O.W. line is also the property line for the adjacent property owners. 3. NCTCOG:Abbreviation for North Central Texas Council of Governments, the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) charged by federal law to administer regional transportation planning. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1. How is the potential F.M. 1938 extension mentioned in historical local planning studies? Answer: The City of Southlake designated the extension of F.M. 1938 on its plans as follows: 1969—Major Thoroughfare ending at city limits; 1975—Principal Collector with realignment near Dove intersect; 1984 -State Highway Extension to S.H. 114; 1991 —Major Arterial to S.H. 114; 1997 — Major Arterial to city limits. (Plan was revised to eliminate areas not within the jurisdiction of Southlake) The City of Keller designated Randol Mill Avenue, from F. M. 1709 to S.H. 114 as a six-lane undivided boulevard on its 1988 Thoroughfare Plan. The current Thoroughfare Plan shows a six-lane arterial to S.H. 114. 2. How is the potential F.M. 1938 extension mentioned in historical regional planning studies, as in perhaps those done by NCTCOG? Answer: The F.M. 1938 extension has been included in the NCTCOG Regional Thoroughfare Plan as a principal arterial since 1977. In 1994, the extension received a regional arterial designation as part of the NCTCOG Regional Thoroughfare Plan. The extension is duly noted as a regional arterial in both the Mobility 2010 Plan Update and Mobility 2020: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. For more information see the following documents: • Thoroughfare Plan for North Central Texas. NCTCOG, 1977 • Regional Thoroughfare Plan, NCTCOG, 1994 L • Mobility 2010 Plan Update, NCTCOG, 1995 • Mobility 2020: The(Metropolitan Transportation Plan, NCTCOG, 1997 FM 1938-Question and Answer Summary Draft Date: 08/14/98 -4:20 p.m. Page I of 6 74 3, What is the history of traffic accidents on Randol Mill north of F.M. 1709 (two-lane section, Cow sharp curves)to the Southlake city limits? Answer: Since January of 1996, the City of Southlake DPS has responded to 47 separate accidents on Randol Mill north of F.M. 1709. ENTITIES INVOLVED: Who or what is Metroport? Answer: Metroport Cities Partnership is a non-profit corporation, which is comprised of eight (8) area cities,four school districts, area chambers of commerce,public utilities, large and small business enterprises, and other related organizations. The purpose of the partnership is to work collectively on public and private initiatives affecting the Northeast Tarrant County (Metroport) region. It has been the practice of Metroport Cities Partnership to participate together whenever possible in providing public services such as radio communication, public safety, water and sewer service, and highway construction. The Metroport Cities Partnership has been incorporated for ten years. 2. What cities are involved in the extension of FM 1938? Answer: The following cities are involved in the process. The principle contact person for each city is also provided. City of Southlake City of Keller City of Westlake Attn. Curtis E. Hawk Attn. Lyle Dresher Attn. Ginger Crosswy City Manager City Manager Town Secretary 667 N. Carroll Ave P.O. Box 770 3 Village Circle, Suite 207 Southlake, TX 76092 Keller, TX 76244 Westlake, TX 76262 PH: 481-5581. ext. 702 PH: 431-1517 PH: 430-0941 FX: 329-1747 FX: 431-5867 3. What other entities are involved in the extension of FM 1938? Answer: Following are additional entities involved and their contact people. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Burton Clifton, P.E. Fort Worth District P.O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, TX 76115 PH: 817-370-6542 FX: 817-370-6759 Tarrant County Glenn Whitley, County Commissioner Jeanne Green, ROW Agent 100 E. Weatherford. #401 Fort Worth, TX 76196 PH: 884-1177 FM 1938-Question and Answer Summary Draft Date: 08/14/98 -4:20 p.m. Page 2 of 6 6, North Central Texas Council of Governments (kami Dan Kessler Assistant Director of Transportation 616 Six Flags Drive. Suite 200 Centerpoint Two Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 PH: 817-695-9248 Freese & Nichols Richard Kelly, P.E. 4055 International Plaza, Suite 200 Fort Worth, TX 76109 PH: 735-7300 FX: 735-7491 4. Who can I contact for updated information? Answer: The City Managers of Keller and Southlake. 5. If any of the cities do not support the project, will it continue to go forward to Austin? Answer: Metroport Partnership will not take this portion of the proposal to Austin if all three cities do not support the project. le PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS: What would the development schedule be for eventual construction? Answer: The preliminary anticipated development schedule at this time is as follows: • September 24, 1998: Texas Transportation Commission Delegation Appearance • 1st Qtr. 1999: Texas Transportation Commission Project Authorization • 1st Qtr. 2001: Environmental approval/public involvement process. • 1st Qtr. 2002: Design/Right-of-Way Plans. • 1st Qtr. 2003: Right-of-Way Acquisition. • 1st Otr. 2005: Construction complete. 2. Why is this roadway being scheduled for widening now? Answer: • To secure the needed right-of-way in advance of development and to improve the roadway in conjunction with anticipated development, thereby better serving both existing and future traffic; • To improve the roadway now at a much lower cost than it would be to construct the improvements in the future after anticipated development has occurred; • To improve north/south traffic flow in the area by developing transportation links between the population and employment activity located in the F.M 1938 Davis Corridor with activity centers south of F.M. 1709, east and west along the F.M 1709 Corridor, and north to the S.H. 114 Corridor; • To take advantage of additional federal funds coming to Texas as a result of the recently passed federal legislation, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century. FM 1938-Question and Answer Summary Draft Date: 08/14/98 -4:20 p.m. Page 3 of 6 7/2- 7 • 3. How much traffic is anticipated to use the improved F.M. 1938 extension? Answer: Traffic forecasts prepared by NCTCOG for the year 2020 estimate that 1 4,000 to 18,000 cars per day would utilize this roadway. NCTCOG traffic forecasts are based on demographic forecasts prepared by NCTCOG in 1996, and may not take into account recent proposed developments in the corridor. This traffic volume warrants a four-lane roadway with the capability of expanding to a six-lane roadway in the future. 4. Where are we now in the process and what are the next steps? Answer: • Affected cities receiving input from citizens • Metroport Cities Partnership decision to continue the petition for funding • TxDOT delegation appearance in Austin on September 24, 1998. 5. How does a person who supports or is opposed to this project voice their opinion? Answer: Concerns can be raised through multiple means. • Written correspondence to each City Representative. • Written correspondence to Councilmembers of each city. • You can also petition the Transportation Commission in Austin to have a 20 minute allocation of time on 9-24-98 to allow three (3) representatives an opportunity to present an opposition position on the proposal. • If the Transportation Commission approves the project, there will be several formal Public Hearings held by TxDOT. LIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION: From which side of the existing road will the most right-of-way be taken from? Answer: • Varies in attempt to reduce the number of properties affected • Exact alignment to be determined in the Design and ROW Phase (8-12 months) • Initial study indicated that there would be less impact by widening to the west. 2. Is there a map or drawing available showing where the proposed right-of-way will be? Answer:A map is available at city halls in Southlake, Westlake and Keller. 3. What happens if certain homeowners do not agree to selling portions of their property as right- of-way? Answer: Following the completion of the ROW acquisition process conducted by Tarrant County. if an agreement is not reached one may file suit in the District Court. Contact Tarrant County's R.O.W. Dept., who will explain the procedures in more detail. 4. Who is responsible for negotiating the acquisition of right-of-way? Answer: The R.O.W. acquisition would be the responsibility of Jeanne Green who is a long-term R.O.W. agent for Tarrant County. Explain what happens to properties that have homes on or very near the expected new right-of- way line. Answer: See No. 3 above. FM 1938-Question and Answer Summary Draft Date: 08/14/98 -4:20 p.m. Page 4 of 6 7/,77 • 6. Will the ROW needed for the extension be purchased from the landowner? Answer: If the FM 1938 extension project continues to go forwarded and is funded byTxDOT, all necessary ROW will be purchased for the fair market value of the property. If the project does not go forward at this time the ROW will not be purchased at this time. Note, however, that should any building permit be requested or development occur on properties adjacent to Randol Mill, each city will require the dedication of ROW from the adjacent property without compensation as a part of the development process. This acquisition will, however, be limited to the ROW required by the respective city's Master Thoroughfare Plan. 7. How are land values determined when property is acquired? Answer: The most recent comparable land/like property sales are evaluated through an extensive appraisal process. 8. How are relocations handled? Answer: Relocations are handled by TxDOT and not by Tarrant County. Agents use the closest approximate property values as well as consider factors specific to the situation. 9. How close does a residence or building have to be to the R.O.W. before relocation will be used? Answer: The residence or building must intersect or be inside of the acquisition area. 10. Is there compensation for the devaluation of property as a result of roadway improvement? Answer:Ifsom No. e of my property is taken and the value decreases, will my taxes go down? Answer: If the appraised value of a property decreases, there will most likely be a decrease in taxes, assuming the tax rate itself has not increased. 12. If R.O.W. acquisition takes all or a portion of the property's septic system, does the County reimburse the expense? Answer: Yes. The cost of a new system, if necessary, will be provided ENGINEERING & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: I. If the new R.O.W. line appears to be very close to a residence, will sound barriers be used or constructed? Answer: As part of the environmental studies performed for this project, traffic noise impacts will be considered, and if warranted, sound barriers will be constructed If the project is approved, there will be opportunities for public hearings during the preliminary geometric design phase to address this item more specifically. 2. When are specific items such as lane configurations, roadway materials, landscaping, traffic signals, etc., finalized? Answer: Beginning with the preliminary geometric design. public hearings will be conducted by Akre TxDOT to determine the roadway design most acceptable to all affected parties. Prior to TxDOT's plan submission for construction bidding, the respective cities will also coordinate public meetings to present proposed construction plans. FM 1938-Question and Answer Summary Draft Date: 08/14/98 -4:20 p.m. Page 5 of 6 • • C. When will the final roadway alignment be approved or known? Answer.Approximately two years. 4. How long will it take to complete the R.O.W. acquisition and determine compensation? Answer:Approximately three years. 5. Who will enforce the speed limit on the new F.M. 1938 extension? Answer: The city having jurisdiction in any particular area of the road will enforce the speed limit. The roadway will be constructed through the city limits of Southlake, Keller and Westlake. FINANCIAL & COST CONSIDERATIONS: 1. How much is it expected to cost? Answer: The construction cost estimate is approximately $14,800,000. The R.O.W. acquisition estimate is$5,000,000-$10,000,000 2. Who will pay for the widening? Answer: TxDOT pays for the construction. Tarrant County purchases the R.O.W 3. Will there be an adjacent landowner paving assessment by the cities if the project is done with city funds? Answer: No L ;kw FM 1938-Question and Answer Summary Draft Date: 08/14/98 -4:20 p.m. Page 6 of 6 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM Lrf' August 14. 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk. City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 705, 2"d reading, Abandoning the right-of-way known as Brittain Drive located in Brittany Place Addition Background Timothy and Lynn O'Connor of 1035 Brittany Court have requested that the ROW known as Brittain Drive, located in Brittany Place, be abandoned. This road has never been constructed and the Planning and Zoning Commission waived the requirement for ROW in the proposed subdivision south of Brittany Place. Ordinance No. 705 provides for the abandonment of the ROW, dividing the parcel between Mr. and Mrs. O'Connor and the other adjacent property owners, Mr. and Mrs. J. Scott Mattheis. A 13 ft. utility easement shall be retained on the southern portion of the (610, ROW that is requested to be abandoned. Recommendation Staff recommends Council approve Ordinance No. 705. 2nd reading, abandoning the right-of-way known as Brittain Drive, located in Brittany Place Addition. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. B W cre Attachments: ROW Abandonment Application Ordinance No. 705 Quitclaim Deeds D: lord Files ROW BrittainLn`abandon2ndrd.doe L 7 B-f • CITY OF SOt THLAKE -r. 6/9 .4 APPLICATION FOR R.O.W. ABANDONMENT STREET NAME: Brittain Drive (unimproved) GENERAL, LOCATION: - — - APPLICANT OTHERS IF APPLICABLE NAMIE: Timothy and M. Lynn O'Connor J. Scott and Brenda Mattheis AIDRESS:1035 Brittany Court 955 Brittany Court Southlake, TX Southlake, TX PHONE: 424-3129 488-4900 I hereby request that the City of Southl ke abandon the R.O.W. referenced herein. I understand and agree to comply with the _ d P e o or R.O.W. abandonment provided by the City. signed: r": `�^ �— • I , ��� '/� !6-�4zLDate: j (ir• ie*xie*******z*:kie**i **********************air****************ie* ie**********hc*, For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the R.O.W. abandonment fee of $150.00 on this the clr, day of51, , , 199 • Signed: / mo Dare: / r p_ � *<z xx****** ,,.***************** ****************************x*x*x*ic* ****ic-zx The following must accompany this application in order to be accepted for consideration. Not Provided Applicable Application fee of $150.00 Completed Application Name, Address and Phone of all Property Owners Adjacent to the Abandonment Request Legal Description of the Area to be Abandoned Graphic Exhibit Showing Area to be Abandoned with Metes and Bounds Shown Legal Description and Graphic Exhibits for any Divisions Proposed for Acquisition by Separate Owners Approval Signatures From All Utility Companies Legal Descriptions and Graphic Exhibits for any Easements to be Retained Approval Signatures of all Property Owners Adjacent to the Area to be Abandoned c: •N?F FCR.MSA??BROW-A3A.N.A2? 7B-12 Mr. and Mrs. Timothy M. O'Connor and Mr. and Mrs. Jeffery Scott Mattheis (Applicants) respectfully request the abandonment of the unimproved Right-of-Way known as Brit:ain Drive in Southlake, Texas, for the following reasons: 1. The land was dedicated for Brittain Drive in September, 1986. For more than 11 years since the dedication, nc steps have been taken to construct the roadway. 2. The Applicants have owned and resided on the lots located to either side of the site for more than four years. 3. If Brittain Drive were improved today, it would lead nowhere. The southern end of the dedicated strip dead-ends :nto a 14.79 acre tract of land, the owners of which have no desire for a public thoroughfare to enter their property at that point. This 14.79 acre tract of land has recently been approved for rezoning as Estate Residential, and the most logical point for ingress and egress is North Peytonville Road, where it exists today. 4. If Brittain Drive is installed, it could create a major artery where none had been considered when the land was dedicated. It could eventually cause Brittany Court to be a link between Coventry Manor (a development of more than 100 homes) and North Peytonville, which would only add to the traffic along North Peytonville. Presumably, this would represent a significant departure from the original intent of the developer of Le Brittany Place and the Southlake city planners who probably required the dedication of land for Brittain Drive. 5. If Brittain Drive is ever constructed, it would cause needless inconvenience to at least two utility companies, since existing water and natural gas lines would have to be relocated from the existing greenbelt. 6. If this road is installed, more than 25 native trees would be destroyed. 7. Al adjacent property owners to this proposed right-of-way are in favor of the abandonment of Brittain Drive. 8. All utility companies servicing this area have indicated their consent to the abandonment of Brittain Drive, as long as the utility easement along the southern boundary ,ains i a . i T1 y M M. O'Connor ./effery Scott Mattheis M. Linn Carroll O'Connor Brenda Mattheis (410, 1035 Brittany Court 955 Brittany Court Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092 (817) 424-3129 (817) 488-4900 7B_3 4. obility 2020: The Metropolitan Transportation Plnig 111 a vision forortati transportationanisthe systems n and services in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area. Serving as a guide for the expenditure of State and federal funds \._, through the year 2020, the Plan addresses 0 regional transportation needs that are identified through forecasting current and future travel demand, developing and �,* < '•` evaluating system alternatives, and selecting .' ,,. •• ' , r� > \ `‘-?n\\\\N„ those options which best meet the mobility `;tip ; , needs of the region. .e 7/1/tetrDloDCit4n Transprt&tticn - Can Mobility 2020 is the product of a cooperative ` `` effort among local governments, Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Fort Worth Transportation \ 4 � \ Authority, Texas Department of ,,, \ Transportation, Texas Turnpike Authority, \ \ \ \\ . RAILTRAN, Texas Natural Resource ,,,‘,,, .`; �, `,, �'\\\*` ` \\\ , "`,\ \‘4. Conservation Commission, and Dallas-Fort ,\,\\< .- ; `•` \� \\ � Worth International Airport. The Plan was "" "' � ' ' ' approved in December 1996 by the Regional '•, ` Transportation Council and the Executive , „ �\\ •\ Board of the North Central Texas Council of \ ��,..4 •„\, t ` Governments (NCTCOG), together serving as `,,. 4 z‘` \\�,\\\\,,� ;� the Metropolitan Planning Organization for \� , .,\\`\\ , ,, the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area. "'1 \ Mobility 2020 was developed in accordance t ' -\� ��>'�` x *,�., \�`\� ,' with the planning requirements established • \`' ' ' \-:\ • in the Intermodal Surface Transportation a \ ` t. � • , ti<, EfficiencyAct of 1991 and the Clean Air Act • `` ` '`�`� Amendments of 1990. The Plan is updated \ \�` ` every three years. This Plan serves to replace yak vow . \ = \\;-..‘„,, \� \ the Mobility 2010 Plan Update developed in \,,� \ ��\ , 1993. Mobility 2020 is the product of a \�� '� `' , \`N\ N�\ multimodal system evaluation which \„,.. recommends a Metropolitan Transportation „ : \ ,\, `; `'�`` `` System, as well as congestion mitigation ,, 4 �` ; • ` strategies designed to minimize drive-alone \ .,;r �\ � , ; peak-period travel and enhance the operation ,_ \\\�� �;. .\ ��\Z i of the Transportation System. , ;<. \"... The development of the Plan was guided by a -' �`"`�` < set of goals which were presented and refined at technical workshops, policy briefings, and public meetings. The Regional Transportation ti '' =,,, I . Council adopted goals in three categories: \ ` *.` traditional transportation goals, quality of life -- goals, and financial goals. Policies, programs "". and projects were developed as part of ` :ms, Mobility 2020 to accomplish these goals. The Plan calls for $32.5 billion in Metropolitan 1 "t, ' �„`1 Transportation System improvements which sow \"\\\~�`\ \\&` ,. are included on pages 4-10 of this summary. 1' \1\ '' Policy Initiatives obility 2020 includes five policy initiatives to Policy Initiatives for address the challenge of increasing traffic congestion in the Dallas-Fort Worth region. Congestion Relief These initiatives include: formulating revenue policies and sources which support implementation of transportation improvements in the region;identifying Land Use/Transportation Interface travel demand management strategies to reduce peak- Advanced Transportation Management period travel demand and drive-alone travel; (Incidents,Accidents) „ implementing traditional capacity improvements to Enhance Be ' gin with'' • Leadership Accessibility address current and future congestion; promoting an Role Program Advanced Transportation Management program which includes traveler information systems,freeway and Maintain Enhance y Leadership Education and '-x arterial traffic management strategies, and public Posture Partnership Programs Revenue/Policies transportation communication strategies; and developing Traditional to to Assist Capacity strategies which ensure a balance between land use and Improvements commitments transportation improvements. These five policy initiatives (Freeway,Rail, through MIS (Toll roads,Implementation HOV,TSM) Studies Legislation) form the basis for the Mobility 2020 recommendations. Travel Demand Management Plan Development Mobility 2020 he Mobility 2020 Plan was completed by NCTCOG staff over an 18-month period. Prior to beginning work on the Plan, Plan Development Process NCTCOG staff verified the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Travel Model's ability to replicate current travel in the region with Establish Goals the 1995 Travel Model Validation. Efforts then focused on the development of travel forecasts through the year 2020 which were used to evaluate transportation options for the future. Throughout the Project Future Plan development process, a series of technical workshops were held with local governments and participating planning agencies to provide technical review of travel forecasts,the evaluation of 1 alternatives, and plan recommendations. .'Y '..:fig S,, ' . -" k Public outreach and involvement activities were critical components qb in the development of Mobility 2020.This process included working ,' 4A, ) C closely with NCTCOG's Surface Transportation Technical Committee, i' Travel Demand Management Committee, and Bicycle and Pedestrian Task Force. Numerous presentations were also provided to elected Identify Congestion officials including the Regional Transportation Council,the NCTCOG Litigation Str 9C 0 Executive Board, County Commissioners Courts, and City Councils throughout the region. Briefings were provided to transportation Identify Traditional implementation agencies including Dallas Area Rapid Transit capacity Aternatives (DART),the Fort Worth Transportation Authority(the T), and the Texas Department of Transportation(TxDOT). Thirteen public Evaluate Alternatives meetings were held during the development of Mobility 2020 covering all facets of the plan development process.A mailing list of over 3,500 individuals was used to notify interested citizens and businesses. Develop Recommendations Other outreach activities included development of an internet home MiMilr, " page for Mobility 2020,presentations to civic and transportation advocacy groups, and working closely with the media. Mobility 2020 Plantt 2 Regional Growth Metropolitan Area reach 3.7 million by the year The continued dramatic growth within the NCTCOG Region 2020, a 61 percent increase. projected for the Dallas-Fort Worth ak X. w,E ee°re„ As shown below,the highest Area underscores the importance of LEGEND kletrOpoiNn Area densities of future activity are coordinated decisions regarding land 11 .aM anticipated to be located along use and transportation investments. «=g major travel corridors. This Future policy initiatives stemming „. dramatic growth will provide from Mobility 2020 are anticipated to AeflPNT many opportunities and focus on opportunities to achieve a Ae M$eN challenges for the region. balance between land use and KAUF transportation. Lower-cost - 10' Largertoday in population transportation alternatives such as 4*, VIA than 27 states,the Dallas-Fort service roads, or freeway Worth Area is a significant interchanges,which provide access to economic, social, and political previously undeveloped areas, are center of both Texas and the examples of strategies which may be he Dallas-Fort Worth U.S. The area is the State's leading emphasized to achieve this balance. Metropolitan Area continues regional economy accounting for over to be one of the fastest 30 percent of the State's gross The recommendations of Mobility growing areas of the United regional product.The region is a 2020 are based on the need to provide States.This trend is expected national leader in the creation of new a balanced,multimodal Metropolitan to continue through the year 2020 as jobs, corporate relocations, and Transportation System which will population is projected to reach an growth in technology-related meet the needs of this diverse rapidly excess of 5.5 million by the year 2020, businesses. One of the primary factors growing economic region. a 39 percent increase above today's in maintaining the growth potential levels. Employment is anticipated to of the area is regional mobility. 2020 Total Population and Employment Density ' _------, Noah Central Texas r, Council of Governments / Research FEE:Services Activity Units Per Acre r <5 Low Denton Co. ';' 5-10 Moderate e ,r 10-20 High '.". µ Collin Co. r. II 'Pi - \ _/— >20 Very High I a i � ' / Map Legend . �. Rockwall Co. N County Boundary -' 41SIIR g t, A- MPA Boundary , • t ' >. *i Major Highway fr.• F .0 N Dallas Co. Tarrant Co. Johnson Co. "IF Ellis Co. 3 Congestion Mitigation Strategies ncreasing traffic congestion is Adopted TDM strategies include the The implementation of congestion one of the greatest challenges continuation of the regional employee mitigation strategies provides several facing the Dallas-Fort Worth trip reduction program.This benefits.The reduction of vehicle Metropolitan Area. It results in voluntary public/private program travel will mean less traffic motorist frustration,lost productivity, helps to encourage carpooling, congestion on our roadways resulting and a deterioration of air quality. vanpooling and transit usage by in reduced travel times,lower vehicle Better management of the offering incentives to the employees of emissions, and improved air quality. transportation system will help the the region's large employers. The Enhanced accessibility,fewer traffic region to address these growing program is supported by the accidents, and greater transportation problems as limited transportation expansion of the region's vanpool system reliability will also be resources struggle to meet rising program, construction of additional achieved through the use of these travel demands. Two types of park-n-ride lots throughout the relatively low-cost strategies. congestion mitigation strategies are region, and the implementation of proposed—Transportation System additional Transportation The recommended congestion Management and Travel Demand Management Associations. mitigation strategies are summarized Management. The Transportation in the table below. Capital costs are System Management(TSM)approach Transportation Management estimated to be$1.1 billion,while to congestion mitigation seeks to Associations (TMAs) are typically operating costs are projected to be identify improvements to new and incorporated,nonprofit organizations $36 million per year at full program existing facilities of an operational designed to work with private implementation.This total includes nature. These techniques are designed industry and the business community an Advanced Transportation to improve traffic flow through better on local transportation issues. These Management System, described in the management of existing facilities. The associations are usually located in following section. The congestion Travel Demand Management(TDM) areas of dense employment and focus mitigation strategies identified here approach to congestion mitigation on the implementation of travel include those transportation system focuses on user demand and behavior demand reduction strategies such as management and travel demand modification strategies to reduce carpooling,vanpooling, and discount reduction strategies determined to be drive-alone and peak-period travel. transit pass subsidies. the most cost-effective for our region. A range of strategies were assessed for their effectiveness and feasibility Congestion Mitigation Strategies of implementation in the region. Congestion benefits, air quality Year 2020 Primary Impacts benefits, and benefit-cost ratios of Strategy Program Description of Strategy these techniques were quantified in order to arrive at a recommended set Employer Trip Voluntary public/private initiative Reduction in vehicle travel Reduction Program targets region's large employers of strategies for the region. Vanpool Program 1,620 vanpools,program Reduction in vehicle travel Adopted TSM strategies include targeting long work-related trips ,,,, intersection and signalization Park-N-Ride Facilities 30 facilities Reduction in vehicle travel improvements on arterial streets and a bottleneck removal program to Transportation 14 candidate corridors identified Reduction in vehicle travel Management Associations for further study alleviate traffic congestion on the freeway system.An Advanced Intersection Improvements 1,680 projects Reduction in travel time;increase Transportation Management System in vehicle speeds on arterials will enhance the operation of Signalization Improvements 13,320 projects Reduction in travel time;increase roadways and transit systems.A in vehicle speeds on arterials special events management program Advanced Advanced Traveler Information System, Reduction in vehicle travel;reduction will aid travel before during, and Transportation Management Advanced Traffic Management System, in travel time;increase in vehicle g, Advanced Public Transportation System speeds on freeways and arterials after major sporting events,festivals, Freeway Program to identify and eliminate Reduction in travel time;increase in and other special events. Bottleneck Removal freeway bottlenecks vehicle speeds on freeways and parallel arterials • Special Events Management Interagency program to identify Enhanced accessibility;reduction in special events,develop and implement vehicle travel;reduction in travel time congestion mitigation strategies 4 Advanced Transportation Management System hile much of the region's The System is made up of the 3.An Advanced Public e traffic congestion is a result following elements: Transportation System(APTS) of traffic demand exceeding includes Transit Management avai lable roadway supply, it 1.An Advanced Traveler Centers which will serve as is estimated that over 50 percent of all Information System (ATIS) will communication hubs for Dallas Area motorist delay on the freeway system provide real-time information to Rapid Transit and the Fort Worth is due to traffic incidents such as system operators,emergency response Transportation Authority. These roadway debris, accidents, or stalled personnel, and commuters regarding systems will be integrated with State vehicles.Advanced Transportation traffic conditions in order to facilitate and local government centers Management strategies will less congested travel. providing better regionwide service significantly reduce this delay. and increased user safety. 2.An Advanced Traffic The cost of the Advanced Management System (ATMS)will Three additional systems including an Transportation Management System rely on new and evolving technologies Advanced Rural Transportation is projected to be$266 million. to detect incidents and expedite System, a Commercial Vehicle Operating costs are projected to be emergency response. Included in this Operations System, and an Advanced $27 million per year at full system system are the Mobility Assistance Vehicle Safety System are implementation. Benefits include a Patrols to assist motorists with recommended. These systems are still reduction in recurrent and non- incidents and accidents. City and in the concept development stage.As recurrent traffic congestion,fuel Transit Transportation Management these programs develop on the savings and air pollution reductions, Centers will also be integrated into national level,in both the public and safer transportation systems, and a the ATIS. The transportation private sectors,they will be integrated reduction in maintenance costs. management centers will support into this overall Advanced traffic management and major Transportation Management System. incident response and clearance. Mobility 2020 Advanced Transportation —______, Management System 0 North Central Texas ents /N �l.��' Trensporletlonemm FREEWAY SYSTEM COMPONENTS A Mobility Assistance _ Basic Communication System,including d• Fiberoptic cables,ISDN,and/or wireless Traffic Sensors MI Advanced Traffic Management System(ATMS), m including Changeable Message Signs, --». •Closed-circuit TV,and Lane Control Signals li 41 I ii°11 I I 114 I I r il TxDOT Transportation Management Center(TMC) ARTERIAL&TRANSIT SYSTEM COMPONENTS ) 0 Al. ,��` © City Transportation Management Center I connected to TxDOT TMC(others to be determined) I A Transit Management Center connected to . Alb,, �,�_`;mill ToDOT TMC Total System includes.Advanced Traveler Information ,a System,Advanced Traffic Management System,and ci Advanced Public Transportation Systemgila NV ,� C3 to • PEER] i OZONE ----- TODRY .. _ ._.. .._.__._— &E SHRRINR '�" n RImi I S ,-_.— wG .' 7^'sue h 7 I: . ' C 1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities , icycle,pedestrian, and The principal component of this These concentrated areas of transportation program is the widening of outside investment may include signed on- enhancements are included lanes on arterial streets to create a and-off street routes,bicycle parking in Mobility 2020 as strategies safer environment for bicycle at storefronts and businesses,bicycle to further reduce the region's commuting. The second storage facilities,lockers, and various dependency on automobile travel. recommendation is the development other amenities for commuters. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are of a companion off-street system Finally,the Plan calls for greater proposed to be developed to mostly referred to as the Regional Veloweb. emphasis to be placed on the planning serve commuter trips of less than 5 The Veloweb will be an interconnected of pedestrian facilities across the miles in length,particularly in high system of paved routes with signing region serving major activity and density areas and along congested and grade separated crossings to transit centers as additional light rail, travel corridors. Developed in facilitate bicycle commuter travel. commuter rail, and high occupancy conjunction with NCTCOG's Bicycle The development of Bicycle vehicle lanes begin operation. and Pedestrian Task Force,the Plan Transportation Districts is the third Transportation enhancement projects calls for$233 million of funding to category of bicycle improvements in previously funded in the Dallas-Fort support four categories of bicycle and the Plan. Bicycle Districts are being Worth Area are inventoried in the pedestrian facilities.The first of these recommended to develop a system of Mobility Plan. Future enhancement strategies is an on-street bicycle improvements which will promote projects will be added to the Plan access program. bicycle commuting as a more viable upon selection by the Texas mode of travel. Transportation Commission. Mobility 2020 Regional Veloweb CvNoun it of Governments Transportation i- I m RECOMMENDED VELOWEB .." CANDIDATE VELOWEB FOR FUTURE EXPANSIONel 0 RECENTLY FUNDED BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN , FACILITIES Veloweb: ® ® I An interconnected network of __ —_ A__ s - — -- off-street trails designed to provide © V 41,111W4 , , safe,efficient mobility opportunities I� 0 to high-speed bicycle commuters Cottonbelp. 4 2 20 Bicycle and Pedestrian At�The Mobility 0 y �\ , ` Transportation Element includes$21 million ® 0 `ate` —--—- of programmed bicycle and pedestrian projects _•����pfunded through the Transportation Enhancement -�► iand the Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Programs. P ,��Il 'I la 1.+i/ neon Ili sso NO11 OZ GI 4 6 Rail and Bus Transit System Mobility 2020 Rail System f 1 North Central Texas I / / Council of Governments N Transportation ,- / / 1 / �j, COMMITTED LIGHT RAIL 7,..- / 0 MINN COOPERATIVELY FUNDED RAIL ( I. 1( ▪ COMMITTED COMMUTER RAIL /� �/ ▪ RAIL SYSTEM EXPANSION / f PENDING FURTHER STUDY i j1t COMMUTER RAIL SPECIAL EVENT \„` f11 i' SERVICE PENDING FURTHER STUDY t' \\ !� • POSSIBLE EASTERN TERMINUS 11 1-4 AREAS FOR FURTHER STUDY k' w V— EXISTING RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY VIIVAr ( Cotton.-tIIMIX. orth�Santa All existing railroad rights-of-way t r r should be monitored for potential •Sa to Fe 1 '' tern on ,future transportation corridors. �. ili,•�,� I ' New facility locations indicate transportation needs and do not . represent specific alignments. ' �� ®� � � s . - JP 74.f Please t \--� We t' l 'i rove /,I;.� Union Pacificir ' ' I .. O itt S•uth a , Oa• --/ / \ cr / i %...,, ` � . , � i ate.. t -' Areas for Further Study ( y, � Study Related Area Description Purpose Task Force Po 7 Northeast/Southwest Evaluate engineering feasibility and Formation of Tarrant Rail 1* Tarrant County environmental implications of Evaluation Task Force commuter rail service along Cottonbelt,from DFW International r Airport through Fort Worth CBD to th major component of Mobility 2020 is the ouOrient line in southwest Fort continuedexpansionof passenger rail service. Ii Arlington/Grand Prairie Evaluate engineering feasibility and Formation of Mid-Cities Rail V,\ The Plan calls for the implementation of 46 Z' and Other Mid-Cities environmental implications of Evaluation Task Force commuter rail service along the miles of light rail service beyond the 20 mile Dorothy Spur and special event service along the Union Pacific line. DART starter system, and an additional 135 miles of rail service contingent upon opportunities for system Stemmons/Burlington Evaluate engineering feasibility and Continuation of Stemmons 3• Northern environmental implications of Corridor Evaluation Task Force expansion. Special event rail service and the expansion of commuter rail service along the Burlington Northern line through the people mover system in the Las Colinas Urban Center Irving to Plano and commuter mil service in the Stemmons(UP) are also identified. The total rail investment identified in Corridor to Carrollton;consider initiation of a Major Investment Study. the Plan is $2.9 billion to be constructed in conjunction with Dallas Area Rapid Transit, RAILTRAN, the Fort 4• North Crosstown Area At a minimum,evaluate the Continuation of North Crosstown engineering feasibility and Corridor Evaluation Task Force Worth Transportation Authority, and local governments. environmental implications of: •rail along the Santa Fe line and Key to the Mobility 2020 rail system recommendations is the Burlington Northern line, including the feasibility of an the call for additional study to determine the engineering alternative connection along S.H.190; feasibility, environmental implications, and funding •mil along the full Cottonbelt Corridor,from Parker Road to requirements to implement the Plan recommendations. To OFW Airport;and •rail along the Cottonbelt Corridor help serve 377,000 daily transit trips, Mobility 2020 with a possible eastern termination point at an Addison recommends continued local bus service, expanded feeder Intermodal Center with continuing service to DFW Airport. bus service to the rail system, and additional express 'All decisions pending further study.In addition to rail,all alternative modes are being evaluated. buses serving new park-and-ride lots and HOV lanes. 7 HOV and Express Lanes System igh Occupancy Vehicle The majority of HOV facilities are Mobility 2020 also recommends multi- (HOV)lanes are a key reversible. In several corridors, such lane peak-HOV lanes with off-peak component of Mobility 2020. as Interstate 635 (LBJ) and Interstate express service. Shown in the map The Plan identifies 249 35E (Stemmons), demand is sufficient insert below, these facilities will be miles of permanent HOV lanes for to warrant two-way HOV lanes. reversible in most corridors and express buses,vanpools, and carpools designed to serve as express lanes for at an estimated capital cost of$1.2 In addition to dedicated HOV lanes, all traffic in the off-peak travel billion. By providing a travel time the Plan also identifies future periods. The Plan includes advantage to users, HOV lanes will corridors likely to be built as toll recommendations from the recently attract commuters normally traveling roads where HOV lanes are also completed Interstate 635 (LBJ) by themselves to rideshare or ride needed. In these corridors, HOV users Freeway Major Investment Study express buses, thereby increasing will be integrated into the design and which calls for a combination of HOV, both the average occupancy of vehicles operation of toll lanes through toll, and express lanes in the corridor. using the system and the system's variable pricing programs which will Other detailed HOV recommendations overall carrying capacity. allow HOV users to travel on toll are pending on-going and future roads free or at discounted rates. major investment studies. Mobility 2020 HOV System I _ North Central Texas N I _- - Council of Governments / Transportation REVERSIBLE HOV FACILITIES > A.M.PEAK PERIOD DIRECTION - TWO-WAY HOV FACILITIES m - MANAGED HOV/ ® I INTEGRATED TOLL ROAD Arrows represent the direction of travel duringthe morning peak period. —- ® 121/114 pending g Direction of travel is reversed during Pending the afternoon peak period on these MIS I.H.635 MIS 190 MIS NOV facilities 1 i LPA Right-of-way preservation should be - Z`. ,,i encouraged in all freeway corridors CD , Datl.• to accommodate potential future / o . Taw HOV facilities 4) © , CP p Tan Parkway ligiohi.... New facility locations indicate 4 transportation needs and do not m 0 ©represent specific alignments 1 en .� ® P .ng Trinit MIS co I Mobility 2020 ' +r, Express Lane System . ® 9 � .. I 2 LANE REVERSIBLE HOV/ 1 OFF-PEAK EXPRESS LANES — -- ____ __ __ ___ __�._._ /I 3+3 LANE HOV/TOLL LANES/ I.H.• 5 MIS OFF-PEAK EXPRESS LANES LPA / \ t ' Q Pen•Ing 0 ii Trinl MIS 0 — a / , v 8 I Freeway and Toll Road System Mobility 2020 Freeway System - ' 0 North Central Texas IV I i I- Council of a tion GovernmentsI Transport IMPROVE EXISTING FREEWAYS _ AM, � lb I NEW STAGED FREEWAYS ' Imo NEW TOLL ROADS • 1 ®arm NEW STAGED FREEWAYS/ © Imp/' -._ TOLL ROADS/PARKWAYS I i PRESERVE RIGHT-OF-WAY � z % PIPP-dlif i l Additional and improved freeway f r No I interchanges and service roads should - Toll J be considered on all freeway facilities r, , -�-7-J in order to accommodate a balancePending_ , ��' / }._ { between mobility and access needs. ----\-,-------- --_.I.___.._._.._.._..___.._._. it 121/114/ IS : New facility locations indicate , ' IS/ithl:I7,, ' � transportation needs and do not "`Fa.`.,,lll i "" / _ _ represent specific alignments. m-I'; ,ter -Y See Express Lanes Map for locations I cirgi © �� of additional mixed flow capacity 1 MEW*i I Ali.' itii4t IV illift 1 ,, w AliteS Le.dirr411.1114111111Pret Ulm:71.111W IIIIIIII cs Ni7terral Dallas CBD k-f 1t� NrIagmmm1 . i mr 4 "0 ./ Q i ______ 04. ,,, A „...___ . .,.._....._ . _...._...../.. ...... .._._.._. ,, Pending Ft.Worth CBD Loop 9 MIS ,v,ir ii, );:it*T , •., *rot' rilikk vokik he regional freeway system is widening of existing facilities by an facilities in many of the outlying a major component of additional two or more lanes. New areas. The final category of Mobility 2020. The Plan Staged Freeways are those improvements is Preservation of addresses the challenge of corridors warranting new freeway Right-of-Way. Travel forecasts in building and maintaining this system lanes by the year 2020.New Toll these corridors do not support the with rapidly growing travel demand Roads are those corridors where need for construction of these and limited financial resources. Key travel forecasts and toll revenue facilities prior to the year 2020. to financing these improvements is estimates support the feasibility of However,in order for these roadways implementation of additional toll construction by the year 2020.New to be built,right-of-way should be roads. Over$2.5 billion of the needed Staged Freeways/Toll Roads/ preserved today by local governments. $7.8 billion freeway improvements are Parkways are future corridors where earmarked for toll road construction main lanes are not warranted prior to The Mobility 2020 Plan calls for the pending further feasibility study. the year 2020. However, staged construction of 1,387 lane miles of construction of service roads and new freeways, 506 toll road lane Several categories of freeway system interchanges should take place prior miles, and 771 lane miles of staged improvements are shown. Improve to that time. This category of construction facilities to address Existing Freeways y includes the improvements includes parkway-type future travel demand. 9 Regional Arterial System critical component of the Included in this system are those In addition to this system of regional Metropolitan Transportation facilities classified as principal arterials,the Plan also includes System is the network of arterials in the 1992 ISTEA roadway funding for$2.2 billion of local regional arterials and local functional classification initiative, as thoroughfares. These projects are government thoroughfares. Mobility well as those arterials submitted to anticipated to be constructed over the 2020 includes 1,680 center line miles the U.S. Congress as part of the next 24 years primarily through city of regional arterials which serve as National Highway System.Additional and county bond programs, and are both connections to major freeway arterials were added based upon critical to maintaining mobility corridors and relievers to many maintaining system continuity and throughout the region.Principal, congested freeways.This$1.2 billion local government thoroughfare plans. minor, and collector arterials serve to system of regional arterials will carry link freeways,toll roads,HOV lanes, 20 percent of the region's daily vehicle A goal of this ongoing thoroughfare and rail lines to major commercial miles of travel by the year 2020. planning process is to establish future activity centers, communities, and project selection criteria which will neighborhoods. Construction of these This regional arterial system is based focus State and federal roadway funds facilities needs to be coordinated with primarily on efforts completed in 1994 on arterials of regional significance on-going congestion mitigation to develop the NCTCOG Regional and contained within the strategies including intersection and Thoroughfare Plan. Metropolitan Transportation System. signalization improvements. Mobility 2020 ) ril Regional Arterial System 44 ca. North Central Texas N Rift Tran Council of Governments A Transportation iff . t ® REGIONAL ARTERIALS i,li ip..4..* a) �" . ,,,,, i New facility locations indicate milk transportation needs and do not �wors,„...;, � �_, I represent specific alignments. �� �Or' Pal '511,,101■ t1 Dallas CBD l.i�'�� L ill1i1ii�11 PIIIMILINIOWA MOM P‘P.PAOlOrAUTII ' \V 41/4 ClittlEpi li .li `I ., -. reelraa�r�*;. •ire• a i-.,� *AM, ,.r�,v1.��•--� �07 r Mr 4.4mAgjil 44. rAirelsmfaribso\ "mpg Fort Worth CBD "APB 11/111Wireillilli ' a 1 t MIME. 41111°. collitit. ,leir 9....... Mimi , I.LI we rAt 10 4 yk 1L) Transportation System Performance ransportation system performance information was generated throughout the ' t995 Base Year Mobility 2020 process. This information was Congestion Levels 111 provided to staff, elected officials, and the ,„ public in order to establish baseline conditions and to serve as a tool in guiding development develo ment of LEVELS OF CONGESTION -- __ ■30% LANE MILES Air transportation system alternatives. non E` • E°94 LINE MILES _ ATL°S°•EF -- In 1995, daily network vehicle miles of travel ANNUAL COST OF exceeded 102 million miles per day in the region. CONGESTION=sz.9B""°" Over 30 percent of the roadways were congested ,,,a 4 -- during the peak hour, resulting in an annual cost of '4iV r#11 Alit ' $2.8 billion in congestion delay to motorists.To serve V ) as a means of comparison,and as a tool to illustrate the potential impacts of future growth, a year 2020 No-Build travel forecast was generated.This process simulated year 2020 travel on the 1995 transportation system. The No-Build scenario cost of t congestion increases to$9.9 billion with over 66 percent of the roadways congested during the peak Congestion Levels — - hour. Severe congestion levels greatly increase to with Year 2020 ' include large portions of Collin,Dallas, Denton, and No-Build Travel Forcast ' Tarrant Counties, and moderate congestion levels consume nearly the entire region. While the No- t` LEVELS OF CONGESTION Build alternatives is not an expected outcome,the a ATLOSO L,7E MILES results of this analysis illustrate the potential •>80°A.LANE MILE' impacts of future growth on mobility. "T°'9•EF ANNUAL COST OF Implementation of Mobility 2020 significantly CONGESTION=S8.9 BILLION reduces the amount of congestion when compared to , the No-Build scenario. However,with daily network1/411111 vehicle miles of travel estimated to exceed 180 million miles per day by the year 2020,the system will be forced to accommodate substantial growth in travel demand over the next 24 years. With Mobility f li IP 2020 in place, approximately 43 percent of the ~ region's roadways will experience peak-hour congestion with an associated cost of$5.5 billion annu y. Similar to 1995 conditions,the northern Congestion Levels with Year 2020 portions of Dallas County and southern portions of Recommended Plan Collin and Denton Counties will continue to / I -- experience severe congestion. Moderate congestion - ��I/ 1 levels are projected to increase in Collin, Dallas, LEVELS OF CONGESTION 1 Denton,Johnson, and Tarrant Counties. OSD�FEMILES - r •s NIX LANE MILES ,4 AT,E °EF Reducing congestion and its related impacts on air - ANNUAL COST OF quality,energy, safety, and the quality of life are CONGESTION=$5.5 BILLION primary goals of Mobility 2020. However, due to 1 N financial constraints, additional capital expenditures v. _ are not feasible without additional revenue. In order1. gbAimut to reduce these congestion levels, additional revenue , strategies must be pursued as well as further , implementation of aggressive congestion mitigation %'" strategies aimed at reducing travel demand. 11 Financial Plan In accordance with the Metropolitan Transportation Cost requirements of the Intermodal System Components (Millions/1996 $) Surface Transportation Efficiency Act, Mobility 2020 must be constrained to estimates of Congestion Mitigation Strategies $1 872 available financial resources. If the Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities and $424 Plan assumes additional revenue to Transportation Enhancements be available beyond current levels,the Plan must also include strategies Rail and Bus Transit System $2,993 , by which this revenue will be HOV and Express Lane System $1,197 generated. The cost of Mobility 2020 $7 822 is estimated at$32.5 billion over the Freeway and Toll Road System 24-year implementation period. Forty Regional Arterial and Local Thoroughfare System $4,608 two percent of the Plan's financial $13,590 resources are directed towards Operating and Maintenance Costs operation and maintenance of the Total $32,506 system. Capital expenditures of$18.9 billion are allocated across the Status Quo Revenue $25,754 various Metropolitan Transportation $6,752 System components based on need Funding Deficit/Proposed Revenue Program and eligible funding programs. The impacts of inflation, and In order for there to be sufficient As part of the development of improved vehicle fuel efficiency funding to implement this Plan, Mobility 2020, an in-depth analysis of resulting in less available revenue per future increases will be needed at a the historical and current mile driven by commuters also reduce rate equal to that of the projected transportation funding was carried this revenue.At risk is an estimated growth rate in inflation. Construction out including investigation of the $6.7 billion of needed funds to of additional toll roads is also a sources of funds, funding formulas, construct this Plan if status quo critical aspect in the funding of and the administrative processes that conditions remain. Mobility 2020. result in taxes and fees being collected and expended for specific Dedicated DART and FWTA local As part of the Plan development transportation improvements. sales tax revenue combined with process,the Regional Transportation federal formula and discretionary Council and the NCTCOG Executive The primary sources of revenue for funding, and passenger fares are used Board adopted policy positions which transportation maintenance, to build and operate public address specific strategies to increase operations, and capital improvements transportation systems. The transit transportation revenue. Because include: federal and state motor fuel agencies prepare operating and implementation is contingent upon taxes, state vehicle registration fees, financial plans to ensure continued the need for additional revenue, the dedicated transportation authority system operation and expansion. RTC will continue to monitor State sales taxes,toll road revenue, and These plans which assume continued and federal legislative initiatives to local government bond programs. growth in transit ridership, transit ensure that funding is available to This analysis revealed that if the fares, and sales tax revenue, were implement Mobility 2020. rates associated with these revenues integrated into this remain at their current levels, or effort. With regard to Revenue-Enhancing Policy Initiatives status quo, there will not be sufficient motor fuel taxes and funding to construct this Plan. This is vehicle registration fees, particularly critical in the area of an analysis of these • Elimination of nontransportation uses from dedicated freeway and thoroughfare revenues reveals that transportation funds construction, as the primary source of periodic increases have • Increases in local, state, and federal revenues for revenue for these improvements is historically taken place. transportation motor fuel taxes. This revenue • Construction of new freeways as tollroads continues to be eroded by the • Removal of the Highway Trust Fund from the federal diversion of funds to budget and spending down the Highway Trust Fund nontransportation purposes. • Review of federal and State design requirements to eliminate unnecessary expenses 12 Air Quality Conformity he transportation strategiesIi The results of the air quality HOV/express lanes, and travel included in Mobility 2020 conformity analysis conducted on demand reduction strategies,all of must be subjected to an Mobility 2020 indicate that the Plan which are components of the Plan and intensive air quality is consistent with the volatile organic inventoried in the Transportation conformity review due to the ozone compound(VOC)emission budget in Improvement Program(TIP). nonattainment status of the region. the SIP and contribute to emission Conformity is the mechanism in the reductions when comparing 2020 In order that the Dallas-Fort Worth Clean Air Act(CAA)that requires the action versus 1990 emissions. Metropolitan Area continues to thrive region's Metropolitan Transportation economically,efforts must remain Plan to be consistent with State and While the Plan meets these focused on our commitments to local air quality objectives to meet conformity requirements, continued implement transportation federal clean air standards as emphasis must be placed on the improvements with positive air identified in the State implementation of Transportation quality benefits. Failure to do so will Implementation Plan(SIP). To meet Control Measures(TCMs). TCMs are jeopardize both our environment and the requirements of the CAA and SIP, our ability to receive additional the Plan must be consistent with an projects specifically designed to reduce this region's congestion and federal transportation system funds established emission budget, g critical to the implementation of this contribute to mobile source emission improve air quality. Typical projects Metropolitan Transportation Plan. reductions, and provide for the timely include intersection and signal implementation of transportation improvements, advanced control measures. transportation management, Conformity of the TIP and Mobility 2020: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 400 — Action o : Baseline U 300 — c 0 4- U c 200 — . VOC Emission Budget = 165.49 I W 0 100 — O j 0 1990 1999 2005 2010 2020 Year 13 Intermodal Considerations 1 ith the ratification of the North American Key Intermodal Facilities in Free Trade Agreement the Dallas-Fort Worth Region / ;uuw(NAFTA)in 1993 12 North Cenvel Texas p �accommodating futureincreases in trade traffic is NAACORRIDORSbecoming an im ortantbp - RAIL LINEStrans ortation issue. Texas leads p TRUCK/RAIL the nation in exports to Mexico; our A TRUCK/PIPELINE INTERMODAL FACILITY '1 freeway,rail, and airport ` �►Q��' infrastructure all play important r TRANSIT INTERMODAL CENTERS Jd1 / AkA ,IV roles in facilitatinginternational , „: i M1 m trade.Approximately 80 percent of �. '�` e all overland trade between the =q��' �- United States and Mexico travels lv� � ��� -�� through Texas. 0 1�14�N ° r , Dallas-Fort Worth is poised to be a ,° o \v significant hub for NAFTA-related 10 ® i trade and transportation activity for all modes of transportation. ��< Mobility 2020 recommends many VA � 1'' 1V improvements that will facilitate 4 further flow of NAFTA-related traffic.There are three principal - freeway corridors in the Dallas- In addition, a NAFTA Corridor Results of both the Airport Mobility 1 Fort Worth region handling NAFTA- Mobility Index was also developed to and NAFTA Corridor Indices suggest related traffic. Interstate Highway 35 measure the benefits of Mobility 2020 that the Plan's recommendations have is a key corridor, due to its proximity recommendations on NAFTA significant positive impacts on these to highway facilities serving the corridors.The NAFTA Mobility Index measures. However, due to the critical northeast and midwest,the primary is based on average peak-period travel nature of these key economic issues, origins and destinations of U.S.- times for primary NAFTA corridors in additional emphasis is needed in the Mexico trade.U.S. 75 may act as an the region. The improvements to planning and implementation of alternative route to I.H. 35 and I.H. NAFTA Corridor access provided by transportation improvements which 45 carries cargo from the Port of Mobility 2020 are also shown. will improve the freight and Houston to points north. intermodal mobility of the region. An important aspect of effectively transporting goods and passengers is access to and from intermodal Airport and NAFTA Corridor Mobility Measures facilities. To quantify the benefits of the Plan on air carrier facilities, an Mobility Index Airport Mobility Index was developed. This index was used to measure the Location level of access to the region's two large 2020 Mobility 2020 hub airports,Dallas Love Field and 1995 Do-Nothing Recommendations Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport that will be achieved with the Dallas/Fort Worth 1.0 1.50 1.22 Mobility 2020 implementation. The International Airport Airport Mobility Index represents the weighted peak-period travel time of Dallas Love Field 1.0 1.48 1.26 all airport users accessing the airport. Improvements to the airport access index as a result of implementing NAFTA Corridors 1.0 1.85 1.50 Mobility 2020 are shown. 14 NCTCOG Executive Board 1996-97 President Director Director Regional Citizen Representative Jim Jackson Tom Vandergriff Bobbie Mitchell (urban) Commissioner,Dallas County County Judge,Tarrant County Mayor,Lewisville Frank Longoria Dallas County Vice President Director Director Elzie Odom Ron Harris Mary Poss Councilmember,Arlington County Judge,Collin County Councilmember,Dallas General Counsel Jerry Gilmore Secretary-Treasurer Director Regional Citizen Representative Attorney at Law,Dallas Ron Harmon Morris Parrish (non-metro) Commissioner,Johnson County Mayor,Irving Penny Redington Executive Director Ellis County R.Michael Eastland Past President Jewel Woods Councilmember,Fort Worth Regional Transportation Council 1996 Chairman Milburn Gravley Lee Jackson Jay Nelson 4 Henry Wilson Mayor,City of Carrollton County Judge,Dallas County Texas Department of Transportation, Councilmember,City of Hurst Dallas District Sandy Greyson Sandy Jacobs Vice Chairman Citizen Representative,City of Dallas Commissioner,Denton County Elaine Petrus Jack Miller Fort Worth Transportation Authority Mayor,City of Denton James Griffin Larry Lipscomb Exec.Director,Texas Turnpike Authority Mayor,Town of Flower Mound Mary Poss Secretary Councilmember,City of Dallas Ron Harmon Bob Hampton Dottie Lynn Commissioner,Johnson County Commissioner,Tarrant County Mayor Pro Tern,City of Arlington Chuck Silcox Councilmember,City of Fort Worth Kenneth Barr Jack Hatchell Barbara Mallory Caraway Mayor,City of Fort Worth Commissioner,Collin County Councilmember,City of Dallas Jim Spence Mayor Pro Tem,City of Garland Dick Bode Charles W.Heald Kenneth Mayfield Councilmember,City of Plano Texas Department of Transportation, Commissioner,Dallas County Robert Stimson Fort Worth District Councilmember,City of Dallas Ron Brown Eugene McCray Commissioner,Ellis County John Heiman,Jr. Councilmember,City of Fort Worth Joe Tillotson Mayor Pro Tem,City of Mesquite Mayor,City of Lancaster Tommy Brown Tom Morton Mayor,City of North Richland Hills Kathy Ingle Mayor,City of Coppell Tom Vandergriff Dallas Area Rapid Transit County Judge,Tarrant County Don Doty John Murphy Councilmember,City of Grand Prairie Mayor Pro Tem,City of Richardson Bicycle and Pedestrian Task Force Surface Transportation Technical Travel Demand Management Michael Morris Committee Chairman Committee Chairman Committee Chairman Director of Transportation, P.M.Summer,Bicycle Dave Davis,Traffic Engineer, Marcos Fernandez,Transportation NCTCOG Coordinator/Planner, Farmers Branch Planner,Plano Dallas North Central Texas Council of Governments The North Central Texas Council of Governments(NCTCOG) is a voluntary association of local governments within the 16-county North Central Texas region.The agency was established in 1966 to assist local governments in planning for common need,cooperating for mutual benefit,and coordinating for sound regional development.North Central Texas is a 16-county region with a population of 4.2 million and an area of approximately 12,800 square miles. NCTCOG has 226 member governments, including all 16 counties, 160 cities, 26 independent school districts,and 24 special districts. Since 1974,NCTCOG has served as the Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO)for transportation in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area. The Regional Transportation Council is the policy body for the Metropolitan Planning Organization. The Regional Transportation Council consists of 35 members,predominantly local elected officials,overseeing the regional transportation planning process.NCTCOG's Department of Transportation is responsible for support and staff assistance to the Regional Transportation Council and its technical committees,which comprise the MPO policy-making structure. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the opinions,findings,and conclusions presented herein.The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration,the Federal Transit Administration,or the Texas Department of Transportation. This document was prepared in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. 15 Contributing NCTCOG Staff to Mobility 2020: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan Transportation Department Mobility 2020 Project Staff Michael Morris Mark Stephens Delores Hernandez Environmental Resources Director of Transportation Technical Analyst II Administrative Secretary Department Dan Kessler Mitzi Ward David Jodray Sandy Blanchard Assistant Director of Transportation Transportation Planner I Transportation Intern I GIS Analyst Program Manager Mobility 2020 Support Staff Shana Klotz Sam Brush Mohammad Al-Hweil Administrative Secretary I Manager of Environmental Systems Transportation Intern I Mahmoud Ahmadi Transportation Planner II Konstantinos Koutsoukos Susan DeCell Ruth Boward Transportation Planner II Environmental Resources Intern Transportation Planner I Vickie Alexander Administrative Coordinator Ed Owens Mike Sims Diane Brostuen Senior Transportation Planner Environmental Planner II Administrative Secretary II Terry Antle Programmer Analyst Vercie Pruitt-Jenkins Jingke Chen Executive Secretary Public Affairs Department GIS Analyst I Everett Bacon Principal Transportation Engineer Jagan Punjal Biatriz Chapa Mike Copeland Transportation Intern I Graphics Specialist Senior Transportation Planner Gustavo Baez Transportation Planner II H.R.Ranganath Research and Information Julie Dunbar Transportation Systems Modeler Services Department Principal Transportation Engineer Wes Beckham Senior Transportation Engineer Greg Royster Bob O'Neal Ken Kirkpatrick Transportation Planner II Director of Research and Senior Transportation Planner Bob Best Information Services Senior Computer Systems Analyst Johnnie Smith Christopher Klaus Technical Analyst III Donna Coggeshall Transportation Planner II Michael Burbank Senior Economic Planner Senior Transportation Planner LaDonna Smith Dan Lamers Transportation Coordinator Lyssa Jenkins Principal Transportation Engineer Ken Cervenka Manager of Research Principal Transportation Engineer Susan Smith Karen Remme Computer Operator Brian Lister Technical Analyst II Kathie Crider Economic Planner II Administrative Secretary II Gary Steinle Dan Rocha Transportation Planner I Senior Transportation Planner David Faria Principal Transportation Engineer Bharath Vellanki Stephanie Roth Transportation Planner II Transportation Planner I Lynn Hayes Senior Transportation Planner Liz Zecckine Randy Skinner Administrative Secretary II Technical Analyst III Shirley Henry Grants Coordinator Thanks to members of NCTCOG's Transportation and Air Quality Committees, local governments and planning agencies staff, elected officials,and members of the public for supporting development of Mobility 2020: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. —_ - North Central Texas Council of Governments ■iiii ',o►: __ P. O. Box 5888 - Arlington,Texas 76005-5888 r PARTNERS IN MOBILITY _______-_,,,w,„..........===........ __..._. ....„......._,_ ,....________________ �� .----. -..„.......... �i..��.. -_ _. _ -......... e-- = . ----- -...... __a • _ --� PrallIP. _ _._ - • • Z - / 1 \ \ \ , . ...................\........./ , i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Fourth Annual Presentation from the Dallas — Fort Worth Metropolitan Area Texas Transportation Commission March 30, 1998 Partners in Mobility Mission IMINHEIM1111111=1 Traffic congestion in the Dallas-Fort Worth Texas Transportation Commission to fi./RMIIIIIMIIIIIIM I•NUMMI•MI•MIMIRIIIM Metropolitan Area is growing. While great pursue cooperative and innovative M1nilli �, strides are being made towards the strategies to address State and regional WIIlI11 I construction of transportation system transportation needs, and support the IIMMI111111111111 improvements, growth in traffic congestion is need for increased transportation funding. �•••,,,,•■�, outpacing available funding to address the"I"I problem. No one mode of travel, and no single To focus cohesively and strategically on jurisdiction or funding agency alone can meet increasing transportation resources, the iiiiiii all of the region's travel needs or solve this North Texas Commission/North Texas dilemma. Strong leadership, collaboration and Regional Transportation Task Force, the 111111 partnerships between the federal, state and Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition,the Greater local governments, roadway and transit Dallas Chamber of Commerce,the Fort Worth 1111111 agencies, and the private sector will be Chamber of Commerce,and the North Central required to meet the region's mobility needs. Texas Council of Governments/Regional Transportation Council came together in 1995 1111 On March 30, 1998, a delegation of State to form the Dallas-Fort Worth Area Partners In legislators, local elected officials,business and Mobility. With the goal of increasing funding civic leaders from North Central Texas for transportation through effective advocacy, till gathered in Austin to reaffirm the priority the the Partners In Mobility remain committed Dallas-Fort Worth Area places on maintaining to education, collaboration, coordination mobility.The Dallas-Fort Worth Area Partners and unity as cornerstones for building In Mobility will continue to work with the regional consensus. Partners In Mobility Steering Committee Staff Representatives ! I R.Denny Alexander Patti Clapp Chairman,Overton National Bank Vice President,Metropolitan Development Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce Barbara Mallory Caraway James McCarley Councilmember,City of Dallas Executive Director,Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition Vice Chairman,Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition Michael Morris George Bayoud Director of Transportation Chairman,Transportation Committee North Central Texas Council of Governments Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce Donna Parker Executive Vice President,Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce Vic suhm Consultant,North Texas Commission Allan Howeth* Managing Partner,Cantey&Hanger Co-Chairman,North Texas Regional Transportation Task Force Jim Jackson Commissioner,Dallas County NCTCOG Executive Board Past President Transportation Providers Lee Jackson* John Bartosiewlcz County Judge,Dallas County General Manager,Fort Worth Transportation Authority Chairman,Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition Joe Paul Jones Rondell Fegan Senior Vice President,Freese&Nichols,Inc. Acting District Engineer,TxDOT-Fort Worth District Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce James McCarley Jack Miller* Interim Executive Director,North Texas Tollway Authority Mayor,City of Denton Jay Nelson Chairman,Regional Transportation Council District Engineer,TxDOT-Dallas District Dan Petty Roger Snoble President,North Texas Commission President/Executive Director,Dallas Area Rapid Transit Paul Wageman Shareholder,Winstead,Sechrest&Minick,P.C. Co-Chairman,North Texas Regional Transportation Task Force Published by NCTCOG Dan Kessler I Partners In Mobility Presenters* Assistant Director of Transportation Kenneth Barr Biatriz Chaps Mayor,City of Fort Worth Graphics Specialist Ron Kirk Mayor,City of Dallas Tom Vandergriff County Judge,Tarrant County PARTNERS IN MOBILITY 2 t The Dallas-Fort Worth Economy "Unprecedented"is the term being used for the economic growth trend occurring IIInHIIIIlIMIll I//II/III■IIIIIIIIIMINI in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area. Since Dallas-Fort Worth Area /-�/MI��III�� January 1, 1995, over 300,000 people Annual Population Growth Val;I;I:=; and 250,000 new jobs have been added IN/11111111111111-' to the region. During this same time �,..,,,,,.■, period, the unemployment rate fell 150,000 1/,.,,,,,..below 4 percent and new home 1111111111 construction reached a 10 year high. A review of economic indicators shows 100,000 A IIIIuIiii that the area continues to be both a statewide and national leader in the ' 11111111 creation of new jobs, corporate 50,000 ENE relocations, and business expansions. As a driving force behind growth in the state and national economy,every effort ilIlIl must be made to provide the fundin for 0 g 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 the implementation of transportation improvements needed to preserve the Source:NCTCOG mobility of the Dallas-Fort Worth Area. 111111 Dallas-Fort Worth: Leading the State's Economy Dallas-Fort Worth Represents: III kwall 24% of Texas Population LiII n 25% of Texas Employment m• 32% of Texas Gross Sales 26% of Texas.Retail Sales 46 26% of Texas Population Growth . 40% of Texas Employment Growth Source:Texas State Comptroller's Office 1998 Projected Texas Regional Gross Product San Antonio Austin 6.92% 5.80% El Paso 2.14% Dallas-Fort Worth 32.25% Houston-Galveston 29.07% 41/1/11 4111111111110 All Other 23.82% Source: Perryman Consultants,Inc. 3 PARTNERS IN MOBILITY North Texas Toll Road Initiatives y11111111111SIK® Toll roads have a long-standing tradition in dependent upon a strong commitment by IIIIMINNIIIIMMIRMINII IMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMINI North Texas. This initiative began with the TxDOT to invest substantial resources in the F/i11H111111I111111 Dallas-Fort Worth Turnpike and continues with Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area. The 111/11111111111111,1 the remarkable performance of the Dallas public's acceptance of toll roads reflects a North Tollway. The Addison Airport Tunnel desire to accelerate capacity improvements lir11111111111 and the President George Bush Turnpike are and a willingness to pay for expedited V11111111 new toll projects under construction,planning is implementation.Public acceptance would erode now underway on other toll projects. Given if there was a perception that Dallas-Fort Worth constraints on traditional highway funding,the was not getting a fair return of the motor use of toll roads to construct additional system vehicle fuel tax and vehicle registration fee capacity is anticipated. Creation of the North revenue it contributes or that the added 111111111 Texas Tollway Authority in September 1997 will investment of tolls was replacing rather than enhance toll road development. However, supplementing traditional transportation continued support for tollways will be funding invested in North Texas. 11111 Dallas-Fort Worth ; — �' Toll Road Activity — 1 —L _ STATUS i i -'— �111111 Existing Toll Roads � __,.,__ r� �— am Under Construction / a�Priority Corridors Under StudyIm L }� � I ^.r� I ! On Hold Corridors Pending Study ( �-��—— \ / a �1—�-- New facility locations Indicate -- _ ® _ —�� transportation needs and do not i I J © _,. ..._............... represent specific alignments. .._._.._....__L.. ..1..........._.. ..... ._._. .... ... _.. --- ....T..-J.I... FF iip, Orill t / ...fit...........__..�...__I.:. `— J l Dallas CBD _ _ ®I _i-\ -�� --I 1 �l III 1 � i -��/ �i Ft.Worth CBD tG�� 0 --- Q dig In lire i !Q =Al ----.. 0, _ _ --) N,____.11P71 0___.. ), _ : / -: ---7- ''' - 11.---9 ', North CenVel Tawas en ._. ....1II. .-..IIr.._..___......_.. 1 1 • .. _-_-. -_.._._............._.._ ! 1 PAS Trenaportetlonernments / r,...._._....._._..-- --;1- ----.._ y-— I ..-Cw Regional Transportation Funding Initiatives Toll roads represent only one of several Dallas-Fort Worth Area ongoing initiatives in the Dallas-Fort Annual Transportation Funding Worth Area to raise local revenues for Total Funding=$$1.2 Billion transportation improvements. Sales taxes are being collected to implement new Local Governments TxDOT State rail systems,high occupancy vehicle lanes, expanded bus service, and ridesharing 11% 13% programs. When combined with local North Texas Tollway Authority 16% government bond programs to construct $ 25% TxDOT Federal transportation capital improvements, these funds account for over 55 percent of 28% the region's annual transportation 7% expenditures. Local funds are critical in DART/FWTA Local DART/FWTA Federal providing the matching funds needed -Local Funding=55% to maximize State and federal transportation dollars. 4 PARTNERS IN MoBILITY Support for Increased State and Federal Funding TxDOT's January, 1997 Transportation Needs level of investment in transportation WMIIIiIHfl MINE Revenue Assessment projects that current infrastructure will be required to mitigate rising W 11••1R�_�_ funding levels will enable the department to roadwaycongestion and sustain economic address only 33 percent of Texas' transportation growth. The Dallas-Fort Worth Area Partners In ffiganiminvium needs over the next ten years. Similarly, the Mobility are working to inform elected officials, NCTCOG projects that current funding levels civic leaders, and the general ,••,,,,,•■, would be sufficient to implement only about 30 importance of transportation investments, the ••,,,,,•• percent of the improvements required between growing gap between transportation needs and 1111111111 now and 2020 to maintain current level mobility. available funding, and the cost of not providing Revenue enhancements to support an increased funding to maintain mobility. iiiiiiiii Texas Transportation System 11111111 Level of Service — Four Funding Scenarios Ellin Excellent Meets Optimal Needs MIN Superior Gaining Ground (Meets 72%of Needs) Good Holding the Line h._rreht—F (Meets 48%of Needs) 1111111 Marginal ungjng Losing Ground (Meets 33%of Needs) FY 1996 FY 2006 1111 Source:TxDOT,January 1997 Texas Transportation Funding Coalition The Dallas-Fort Worth Partners In Mobility are joining forces statewide with chambers of commerce, transportation interests groups, metropolitan planning organizations, NAFTA corridor coalitions and others to develop an informed constituency in support of adequate funding to maintain and expand the Texas transportation system. Current efforts are focused on Washington, D.C. to ensure that we achieve increased federal funding for transportation and that a greater share of federal transportation dollars return to Texas. t, Dallas-Fort Worth Mobility Funding Needs The Partners In Mobility are also active in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area presenting the need for increased transportation funding to chambers of commerce,civic organizations, transportation interest groups, and local elected officials. The presentation documents the dramatic economic growth of the area over the last two decades, the resultant increase in travel demand and growing congestion levels, and the importance of increased State and federal transportation funding needed to mitigate further increases in traffic congestion. 5 PARTNERS IN MOBILITY Progress Toward Funding Needed Roadway Improvements NM/WIMl■■■UIS— The Dallas-Fort Worth Area Partners In The Intermodal Surface Transportation ■_��■■■■■■��� Mobility coalition has appeared before the Efficiency Act created a new opportunity to Commission annually since 1995, each time combine funding from multiple agencies 111,/1111111111111, presenting a list of backlogged mobility to construct needed transportation �/1��111��� projects, with a request that as many as improvements. The Dallas-Fort Worth Regional I,•,,,,,,■ possible be advanced to Priority One status in Transportation Council and the Texas 11111111 ,,■ the Unified Transportation Program.These are Transportation Commission have taken needed capacity projects which would be ready advantage of this opportunity, bringing for letting to contract within the next one to together Surface Transportation Program „" five years if additional construction funding Metropolitan Mobility, Congestion Mitigation was available. Some are needed in order to Air Quality Program, and Commission complete a missing link or final segment of a Discretionary funding to expedite III 111 larger project. Others are in critical locations implementation of$142 million in priority which serve to relieve major roadway capacity projects in North Texas. This kind of bottlenecks. Over the last three years, the partnership effort enables a leveraging of state III III Commission has moved $574 million of these and regional resources, resulting in mobility previously backlogged projects into Priority enhancements for Texas citizens.The Partners One status, thereby providing tremendous In Mobility coalition is most appreciative of the III mobility benefits to the region. Commission's participation in these initiatives. Previously Backlogged Mobility 111111 and Regional Transportation Council/ Texas Transportation Commission Partnership Projects ` North Central Texas N 4111rill Counaoftiovemmen[s Fir Transportation f� ® • Backlogged Mobility Projects Moved to Priority 1 Status in theSAKAI �Unified Transportation Program � mi_.._-. gi Regional Transportation Council/ '� = Texas Transportation Commission the! 0 Partnership Projects tarf�► , 8 PARTNERS IN MOBILITY 6 Partners In Mobility Request WN/MIMIUMMIE UMMIll TxDOT Dallas and Fort Worth Districts M� i■i� Projected Backlogged FNMIIll11111Sa INNIIIIIIIIIIII Mobility Projects __ I-SIMMIIIME C. �aoam=-s 7 iIIIIlIII v O r COStS(millions) ,I„"".,Fort Worth Dallas ® _-- ---- --- _--- INIIIII11 iM FY99 $ 22.8 $302.7 .H:05 LB.4 0 iiiiiiii FY00 $ 61.0 us.es intercha i • FY01 $ 0.0 $ 61.0 $114.6 J,' k � �� taped Con' coon Timm F- - • eFY02 $132.7 $ 40.3 - c FY03 $ 0.0 $ 14.7 © _ � 4trt pi4.r i . TOTAL $216.5 $533.3 .Q C i -® Ilk is.„ Actions for Texas Transportation Commission Consideration I Move as many of the backlogged mobility projects as possible into Priority One status i in the 1999 Unified Transportation Program.The map above and the list enclosed in the Commissioner's binder reflects$750 million of needed capacity projects which will be ready for 111 letting in fiscal years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, or 2003 if construction funding is available. Adopt a policy which provides incentives for regions to expedite cost effective projects by leveraging local, State,toll road, and private funding.This initiative would expand our regional partnership opportunities with TxDOT. Call upon Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston to assist in the development of this policy. Look at specifically identified North Texas tollway projects during consideration of near term investment decisions-they are excellent leverage opportunities with attractive returns. Continue and expand the collaboration between the Dallas-Fort Worth Area Partners In Mobility,the Texas Transportation Commission,TxDOT, and the Texas Transportation Funding Coalition,to enable all to work effectively in Austin and Washington to increase the level of resources available for investment in Texas'transportation infrastructure. i 1 7 PARTNERS IN MOBILITY Dallas-Fort Worth Area Partners In Mobility W 111.1 iIIlmi A broad based public-private coalition created in 1995 to provide effective midi ��i advocacy of the region's surface transportation needs WlIIIIIIIIWA WWNII■■IIIMI III'll ""IIII /.i„iiiii 5 Counties and 26 Cities Steering Committee 111111111111 AddisonDuncanville Ellis County Lancaster Allen McKinney Dallas Regional '�„"". CedarlHn Farmers Branch Mesquite Mobility Coalition Cedar Hill Plano Collin County GarlandFrisco Richardson "Ii Dalla GlennHeights Rockwall County Lee F.Jackson BarbaraMcC Dallas Grand Prairie Rowlett Mallory Caraway Dallass County Highland and Park Sachse Staff: James McCarley i Denton Hutchins University Park IIIIIIIII Denton County Irving Wylie DeSoto Members of Congress 11111 Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce Business Leaders and Employers R.Denny Alexander 11111 Joe Paul Jones Staff: Donna Parker i State Legislators 37 Local Elected and Transportation Agency Officials Representing: North Central Texas Council of —. 9 Counties Governments 111 Cities Regional Transportation Council TxDOT Dallas District Jim Jackson TxDOT Fort Worth District Jack Miller I Staff: Michael Morris Fort Worth Transportation Authority Texas Dallas Area Rapid Transit Transportation North Texas Tollway Authority Business Leaders and Employers Commission Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce George Bayoud Paul N.Wageman Staff: Patti Clapp t Texas Department of Transportation North Texas Dallas Citizens Council Commission N. DART&The T North Texas Regional DRMC&NCTCOG/RTC Transportation Collin,Dallas,Denton&Ellis County Judges Task Force Chambers of Commerce: Allan Howeth I Dan Petty I Arlington Grand Prairie North Dallas Staff: Vic Suhm Best Southwest Greater Dallas N.E.Tarrant Cleburne Greater Irving Oak Cliff Farmers Branch H.E.B. Plano Fort Worth Mesquite Richardson Garland Metrocrest Rowlett I 1 1 '. I I I I I III PARTNERS IN MOBILITY Executive Summary �J 1 , Thoroughfare Plan for North Central Texas bcfr l k/77 oughfare system.The consultants then met again with jurisdictions to suggest potential solutions to these problems. Thoroughfare Plan Substantial work was also undertaken by the jurisdictions involved,to review and reassess that jurisdiction's plan as a means of providing input and reac- tion to the consultant suggestions. It should be noted that the cities and Background Pinnell-Anderson-Wilshire and Asso- consultants not only examined the g dates, Inc., and Marvin Springer and thoroughfare alignments,but also tried Associates, Inc., was chosen to to better define the functional During April. 1974, as the annual develop a coordinated Thoroughfare classification of the various thor- transportation planning work program Plan for North Central Texas.The firm oughtares.Also,as part of the consul- for the region was being prepared,sev- of John Hamburg and Associates,Inc.. tant effort, recommended standards eral of the local governments indicated was selected to develop procedures for were developed for the geometric and there was a major need to coordinate the inventory of the thoroughfare sys- pavement designs for thoroughfares. the many jurisdictional thoroughfare tern, as well as to develop the thor- Construction cost estimating proce- plans in the region.The local planners oughfare planning system, which will dures were also prepared. also indicated a need to accomplish an enable local governments to evaluate inventory of the region's thoroughfare candidate thoroughfare projects for a Consultants submitted the first draft network and to develop improved pro- potential capital improvement pro- of the recommended Thoroughfare cedures for thoroughfare planning, gram. Plan,at the scale of 1 inch=800 feet,to especially capital improvement pro- all of the cities and counties for de- gramming. tailed review in October, 1976.After a The Thoroughfare two-month review of the consultant's Before initiation of the efforts, a Plan recommended final plan, comments technical committee was organized to were assembled and the plan was re- direct the study. The Thoroughfare fined to reflect the desires of the juris- Plan Review Committee was confirmed Preparation of the Thoroughfare dictions. by the North Central Texas Council of Plan was begun in February, 1976. The Thoroughfare Plan was re- Governments Executive Board to The consultant firms initiated their viewed by the Thoroughfare Plan Re- develop the detailed work program and work by contacting cities in Dallas and view Committee and the Highway oversee its conduct.The Thoroughfare Tarrant Counties and parts of Ellis. Technical Committee. It was also re- Plan Review Committee and its five Kaufman, Rockwell, Collin, Denton, ceived by the Steering Committee of support task forces were composed of Parker, and Johnson Counties to col- the Regional Transportation Policy Ad- staff representatives designated by lect the latest available information visory Committee and the Executive major local governments and repre- concerning each jurisdiction's thor- Board of the North Central Texas • - sent a wide range of backgrounds and oughfare plan. Then the consultants Council of Governments inJune,1977. positions within local governments— recorded all existing information on a It must be emphasized that the Thor- transportation planners, urban plan- set of maps at the scale of 1 inch=800 oughfare Plan is not considered by ners,data processing personnel,pub- feet, which corresponds to the any of the regional committees tobe the lic works personnel,and other fields of NCTCOG aerial photography program approved plan for the region.Formal expertise.This sort of technical knowl- scale,and began to identify some exist- adoption of the Plan can come only at edge was necessary in the thor- ing coordination problems. The free- the jurisdictional level. Thus, formal oughfare planning efforts because of way plan,as approved by the Steering adoption of the Plan by the appropri- the wide scope of the projects to be Committee in November, 1974, pro- ate local government should be con- undertaken. vided the basic framework for the thor- firmed by any private individual or firm oughfare plan and no modifications to desiring to make use of the informa- Following several meetings to dis- it were considered. tlon provided by the map of the Plan or cuss the details of such a massive the resulting Thoroughfare Plan Re- planning task as would be involved in Additional consultant evaluation in- port, meeting the suggestions for those cluded the definition of major traffic thoroughfare projects,two major con-. generators, major land use barriers. It is an important aspect of any sum- sultant efforts were outlined.A team of etc., and an analysis of the impacts mary of the thoroughfare planning ef- consultants, Carter & Burgess, Inc.. each would have on the existing thor- fort in the North Central Texas region to 1 • acknowledge the cooperation of the decisions can carry beyond jurisdic- mary map of the Thoroughfare Plan local governments and their planning tional boundaries. recommends approximate alignments staffs in the compilation and refine- of freeways, principal arterials, and ment of the Thoroughfare Plan by Among the items which have been minor arterials.Major collector streets keeping maps and records in current confusing in the past is the functional are shown only on the 1 inch=800 feet order.The Thoroughfare Plan is one of . classification of thoroughfares.Differ- scale detailed Thoroughfare Plan the important items in allowing prog- ent names for the same type of street, maps. ress of the other major effort initiated with no single existing standardized by the Thoroughfare Plan Review classification, made for much confu- Implementation of the total thor- Committee—that of the Thoroughfare sion in the region.In an effort to elimi- oughfare network as shown in the Plan Inventory and the Thoroughfare nate semantic problems in discussing is affected by any number of external Analysis Process. Local participation thoroughfare planning. the thor- influences. Elements such as Federal, in both efforts is necessary for any oughfare planning effort, directed by State,or local financing ability; policy measure of success, and the level of the Thoroughfare Plan Review Com- decisions on energy or air quality;the participation is certainly worthy of mittee,devised a functional classifica- acceleration or deceleration of re- commendation. tion scheme applicable to the entire gional growth; and the extent and re- region.The four categories used in the sults of community involvement and Thoroughfare Plan are freeways,prin- cooperation, could all have an effect The Thoroughfare cipal arterials,minor arterials,and col- upon the implementation or staging of lectors.(Three of the four categories of implementation of the Plan. Plan Report roadways are found on the summary map contained in this Executive Sum- Geometric Design The production of the Thoroughfare mary.)The classification system used is fully compatible with that of the State Standards Plan and recommended standards for Department of Highways and Public geometric design, pavement design, cost estimating procedures, is Transportation. A thoroughfare iden- and The development of geometric de- tification system for the 1 inch = 800 documented in the report, Thor- sign standards for thoroughfares in the oughfare Plan for North Central Texas, feet scale maps was also devised. A region was initiated to provide a guide street labeled P6DF, for example, April,1977.This report should be con- to encourage uniformity in facilities to would indicate by the first letter the suited for any detailed information functional classification—in this case serve regional traffic and to help cities concerning procedures followed in be aware of the factors which form the a principal arterial;the second element production of the plan or the stan- basis for good design practice.Specif- indicateseteri the number of lanes;the third icall excluded from the design stan- dards. Copies of the report are on file Y g letter indicates division of lanes—in with transportation planning depart- this case a divided street; and the last dards were freeways,as such facilities ments of each of the local governments letter shows the degree of access of the are developed by the State Department affected,or related planning offices;or roadway — in this example the exis- of Highways and Public Transportation from the North Central Texas Council in compliance with national standards. of Governments Regional Information fence of frontage roads. Likewise,local street design standards Services Center(RISC). The network of freeways and princi- are excluded because of their strictly pal arterials represent transportation local nature. The Thoroughfare Plan is the result facilities of major significance to the of extensive information gathering, region.Minor arterial streets intercon- The Thoroughfare Plan Report analysis, and review. The basic pur- nect with and augment the network of addresses several individual design pose of the planning endeavor was the freeways and principal arterials.Short elements and recommends specific establishment of a regional thor- trips for land access and circulation are standards.For most of the design ele- oughfare network that embodies the served by collector streets. ments, standards are presented at basic features of individual city plans minimum, desirable, and recom- where possible and which is structured The Regional Thoroughfare Plan in- mended values. Design elements ad- and presented in such a way that there cludes a delineation of those existing dressed in the report are as follows: is a high degree of regionwide consis- and planned major streets and traffic land width;median width;right-of-way tency and continuity.Communities are ways within the urbanized area that width; design speed;grades;horizon- given an opportunity through the Plan meet the standards defined by the tal curvature;stopping sight distance; to better understand how their thor- functional classifications. Each of clearance; parkway design consid- oughfare networks become integral these thoroughfare types and the spe- erations such as sidewalks, access parts of the regional system and how cific roadways are discussed in the control features,aesthetics,and bicy- impacts resulting from local planning Thoroughfare Plan Report. The sum- cle paths; and utilities. 2 • Roadway capacities and access Design standards are presented in with associated standards is included management are also discussed in the two ways in the Thoroughfare Plan Re- for each roadway type.A sample of de- section on geometric design,as is the port.First,specific standards for each sign standard information is provided effect of drainage facilities on thor- design element are presented. In below for one of the roadways in- oughfares and on thoroughfare de- another format,a graphic depiction of cluded,a P6DF—Principal Arterial,6 sign. a cross-section of the design element lanes, divided, with frontage roads. DESIGN STANDARD P 6 D F - PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL. 6 LANES. DIVIDED WITH FRONTAGE ROADS •• ••iiiLmo,„. 4..••••••••••••• Oarm•••••••• ••...........J5.•—•-•—..........4••••••••••••R .4.2 ••M+•r r"52;f4 l•"t • lM'l • U"[ a(l h.M LAW( • O.' • LAW r3•D AMU. 10 Min. 30' 20'-24 _ 33'-34' 14'-24' 33'-36' 20-2i- 30 p "• 13' 30` 20' 367 24T(+) 36� 20, r 30' 13' 20o iN 230' i Bolder numbers denote recommended standard DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Minimum Dalrablo Raeommanded Number Traffic Lanes 6 6 6 Lane Widths (feet) 11' 12' 12' Right-of-Way Width (feet) 200' t 228' 230' Design Speed (M.P.H.) 40 40-50 Grader (percent) 0.5 Min. 6 Max. 4-6(t) Stopping Sight Distance= (feet) 275-375 350-500 350-500 Horizontal Curvature 3 (degrees) 5.5-13.5 Vertical Clearance (feet) 15' 15'(+) 15'(+) Lateral Clearance (feet) 2' 6' 6' Capacity (vpd): 45,000 NOTES: 'Standard used depends upon type of terrain and design speed. 'Standard used depends upon design speed and perception/reaction time. 'Standard used depends upon design speed and extent of superelevation. `Effective capacity is reduced with any lateral clearance less than 6'. *See Parkway Uesign Considerations. 3 • likewise based on the various roadway gineers will make final determinations Pavement Designclassifications which were established of the local conditions and require in the development of the Thor- ments of each individual situation. Standards oughfare Plan, the recommended geometric design, and pavement de- The design of pavement structure is sign standards. dependent on many factors.Those fac- tors discussed in the pavement design Two alternative types of pavements standards section of the Plan Report The purpose of the development of are delineated in the standards.These include amount and type of traffic, pavement design standards is to pro- are jointed reinforced concrete pave- subgrade strength and character,qual- vide standards that can be used by ment and full-depth asphalt pavement. ity of pavement materials,and service local agencies as a guide in establish- Because of the many variable factors in life.Information on each of the design ing pavement cross-sections for the the design and construction of road factors is provided in the report. Rec- construction of thoroughfares within and street pavement,it was necessary ommended pavement standards for the region. These standards were to adopt average values that provide a thoroughfares and collector streets are developed using the classifications de- common beginning and that could be included in detail. A sample fined in the Geometric Design Stan- adapted to most locations in the study cross-section of a standard pave- dards.Cost estimating procedures are area. Each jurisdiction's local en- ment construction is shown below. 24'.36' I 24'+ 24'-36' ` 1 I/4"/FT. I/4" .-'' .02% /FT. —_� 2:I MAX. ee TA TS EQUIVALENCY FACTORS I' ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE = I' ASPHALT BASE COURSE (Ti) CBR I' ASPHALT BASE COURSE = 1.5' ASPHALT SUBBASE COURSE I' ASPHALT BASE COURSE = 3.0' LIME TREATED SUBBASE (TSB 2 4 8 I' ASPHALT SUBBASE COURSE= 2.0' LIME TREATED SUBBASE TA 15' II- 8' Ts 5' B' B' TOTAL 21' 17. 14- MIN.TA = 7' CONSTRUCTION STANDARD - ASPHALT PAVEMENT P 6 D. P 4 D - PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL. DIVIDED 4 • Thoroughfare Planning System Conceptually,transportation system oriented tools to permit analysis of evaluation is a basic function of the projected transportation implementa- Cost Estimating Thoroughfare Planning System, as it tion alternatives. These tools may be provides the local government with a used for example to simulate perfor- Procedures foundation for selecting from among mance measures such as pollution several alternative courses of action emissions, traffic volumes, or con- possible for improvements to the struction costs. transportation system in their commu- The Thoroughfare Inventory in- As mentioned earlier,a method of es- pity and the region. cludes the field collection of data such timating the costs of those roadway as number of lanes, speed limit, designs recommended in the Geomet- The Thoroughfare Planning System whether or not the roadway is divided, ric Design Standards and Pavement includes the Thoroughfare Plan, as g discussed, and an inventorypavement width and type,signalization Design Standards was developed.The of the and type of parking. effort also included a method to gather region's thoroughfare system. It also cost information data from the local offers a Thoroughfare Information Sys- The Thoroughfare Information governmental agencies, and that in- tern (TIS) and Thoroughfare Analysis System (TIS) will manage the Thor- formation is used to compile a report of Process (TAP) which are computer- oughfare Inventory data, develop cost data on street improvements being made in the area. Considered in the estimating of proposed street improvements are Thoroughfare Thoroughfare elements such as pavement, storm Thoroughfare Inventory g drainage, structures, engineering, —♦ Information right-of-way,traffic signalization,utility Plan a.Existing Links System adjustment of relocation, railroad b.Future Links crossings, landscaping, and lighting. The actual cost estimating procedure j is based on the concept of arriving at a "per linear foot"construction cost for the few basic items that are a part of almost all street improvement projects. Thoroughfare and then, expanding this "per linear - Analysis foot" cost using adjustment factors Process developed from actual cost data on streets that were recently built in the study area. Two adjustment factors were developed — one for drainage 1 costs,and another for the level of adja- cent development.The majority of any Diagnosis&Evaluation street construction cost includes street excavation, soil stabilization or base material, curb and gutter,and asphalt or concrete pavement. "Per linear Modification of Plan foot"costs for these major factors may be estimated and then adjusted with localized factors. 5 reports for local governments, and provide the interface with the Thor- oughfare Analysis Process(TAP). r r The Thoroughfare Analysis Process -- • =f -/" `"•,- r• ;, r 1 �,_ ,� `; (TAP)is a group of computer tools that 1 ' ..-1 4 • • •• `- - provide traditional roadway planning .,1 �I. �, • ! `f`-3•• . _ • t ; • _ A.M..% 1" , capabilities for simulation and analysis M _ 1,•' I ' •r at the regional scale, innovative :) .I d-' .'•::::::.....t7,4:4;,i.z."/":-.'.. , jl,' i � • • `- • ..capabilities for examining highway and - \--, _ ) � �thoroughfare alternatives at the com- 4 • • 7 '�• , ,.;_• , L c';munity level, and a future enhance- ■ `r,;ment for includin transit o lions in 9t {'=:: I.' ' the planning focus. p m! +� An example of the system's use is as . : iE `•1�'-pQ • Jb+. follows:The city council would ask the ,�51/02,;_�i ; �_._ �� city staff person to prepare recom- a =' �■�- �a■ . �-+�—+ . mendations for a five-year capital im- ,', Willittm. Ce.f•-•V,'&:.„�. provement program.The city planner/ .i= [�. lb - traffic engineer/public works engineer Ill I s, _ __ J { ,'21 •...14 -'-� would begin his study by looking at the VI 1' a '' a•. a: -1rs � , Thoroughfare Plan and might identifyCIO - -.. I -4• ,r 11 .i+` '`.':1iai n • _ r 15 potential projects. At this point he , - •— would ask the Council of Governments _= i i �.COG _— to use the Thoroughfare Information PLATE_ System to prepare a report of the exist- ing conditions on each of the facilities being considered for improvement. (This information would have come from the Thoroughfare Inventory and the facility, acnriudesucvolumes, nu beruse of Updating and Availability of Plan Maps the facili ,traffic volumes, number of lanes,etc.)Then using the cost estimat- ! ing procedure he would prepare an es- timate of the construction cost for each of the 15 projects. With this informa- tion, the city planner might develop The updating of the Thoroughfare alternative capital improvement pro- p g 9 jurisdictions and to the general Plan will be grams(combinationsoflessthanall15 a continuous process public. Copies of the Plan Report which will involve recording all may be obtained from the NCTCOG projects)for traffic analyses and work changes and planned changes to the Regional Information Service Center with the Council of Governments in thoroughfare system by the local gov- at a cost of 510. The Executive preparing Thoroughfare Analysis Pro- Summaries are available from the ernments and incorporation into the cess (TAP) inputs. Following the TAP Inventory file.The Inventory file will be Center at no cost. computer runs,the analysis would be maintained by NCTCOG for use by the reviewed and an appropriate capital Thoroughfare Plan Maps, at a scale improvement program recommended local jurisdictions. of 1 inch = 800 feet, may be obtained to the city council.Alternative capital from the Center in the form of blueline improvement programs may be iden- The Thoroughfare Plan is docu- prints, paper sepias, or mylar sepias. tified by the city council and additional mented in the Thoroughfare Plan The map numbering system corre- TAP analysis requested,before finaliz- Report which is technical and sponds to the current aerial map pro- detailed in nature and intended ing the issue to be taken to the voters. gram maintained by NCTCOG.The cost primarily for local government staff per map sheet will correspond to those The analysisalso includes use. Each jurisdiction has been y processsupplied with copies of the report. charged for similar items available other additional uses in evaluating The Executive Summary of the through the Center. For current cost transportation system improve- Thoroughfare Plan was prepared for information please contact the ments. general distribution within the local NCTCOG librarian at(817) 640-3300. 6 Regional Transortation Policy Advisory Committee Roy Orr.Dallas County Commissioner.Chairman Jerry Mebus.Tarrant County Commissioner.Secretary Policy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Richard Smith.Dallas City Councilman.Chairman Charles Clack.Garland Mayor.Vice Chairman • Postage Thoroughfare Plan Review Committee Gayle Pepper.City of Dallas.Chairman;Jim Baddaker.Tarrant County; Don Bean.City of Fort Worth.Vice Chairman;Jerry BewL City of Irving; George Dowling.City of Mesquite;James Elium.City of Lewisville:Jim Jenne,City of Carrollton;Hal Jones.City of Garland:Don LaBelle.City of Fort Worth:Jerry Martin.City of Richardson;Steve Nordholt.City of Grand Prairie;Sayed Omar.City of Dallas;Don Penny.City of Arlington;Dave Ricketts.City of Fort Worth;Elbert Tschoepe.Dallas County:Don Walden. State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Regional Plan- ning Office:Tom Walton.City of Piano;Doug Waskom.City of()alias. • 7 Ifr.f/ N / 1 > Nbf ((1 ` F,_.. ice, ', \ ( 7/ , 7- lt, :. 7 i . ii----,.....s\>,, „, OF.....111.VS1 . .), ------N-":N---"'"•..... II %PO _\1, 1/ 4 ........._1 ; \ ii, \ .,,, , .•• ., A No% .,. ai i Ili .4, .N_/.- i 1 e/' 1 I .. �-.s1 DALLAS CEfTRAL CITY IfSET /, __ I. )-*/ 40 • 21 6,,Al ' . \-,—,-- ,...-•—• 1 ,givr y . .......... ... ,, - __ _ . rI\ ( (....i...s i____ ,,,,,, r-\\ I /.. /cf....‘ \ I I AI., _______ , FORT WORTH CEfTRAL CITY If1SET •wfo. .., -fool THIS THOROUGHFARE PLAN WAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE. OF THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.AND REFLECTS THE EFFORTS OF THE AFFECTED CITIES AND COUNTIES TO COORDINATE THEIR INDIVIDUAL THOROUGHFARE PLANS INTO ONE PLAN THAT IS CONSISTENT AT THE LOCAL. COUNTY AND REGIONAL LEVEL. IT IS INTENDED TO REFLECT THE ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT OF THE THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM. AND THEREFORE IT IS NOT RELATED TO A SPECIFIC FUTURE POINT IN TIME. IT IS REALIZED THAT CONSTRUCTION OF MANY OF THE THOROUGHFARES WILL OCCUR ONLY AS LAND DEVELOPMENT TAKES PLACE. MEMBERSHIP ON THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE INCLUDED:THE CITIES OF ARLINGTON. DALLAS. FORT WORTH. GARLAND. GRAND PRAIRIE. IRVING. LEWISVILLE.MESQUITE. PLANO AND RICHARDSON; THE COUNTIES OF DALLAS & TARRANT; AND THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS & PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. POTENTIAL USERS OF THE INFORMATION ON THIS MAP,ESPECIALLY PRIVATE CONSULANTS AND DEVELOPERS,ARE REQUESTED TO CONFIRM FORMAL ADOPTION OF THE PLAN BY THE AP- PROPRIATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO REQUESTED ABANDONMENT Timothy M. and M. Lynn O'Connor (Applicants) 1035 Brittany Court Southiake, TX 76092 (817) 424-3129 J. Scott and Brenda Mattheis (Applicants) 955 Brittany Court Southlake, TX 76092 (817) 488-4900 Yves and Sharon Meyer 1925 N. Peytonville Road Southiake, TX 76092 (817) 329-5306 L L 7B-4 (1000.., LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE ABANDONED Being a tract of land situated in the Thomas H. Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being the 50 foot wide right of way shown on the Plat of Brittany Place, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, recorded in Volume 388-199, Page 96 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, as Brittain Drive, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 7, Block A, of said Brittany Place, said point being at the intersection of South right of way line of Brittany Court and the East right of way line of said Brittain Drive; Thence South 0 deg. 33 min. 04 sec. West, along the West line of said Lot 7, and the East line of said Brittain Drive, a distance of 125.00 feet to a point for corner, said point being the Southwest corner of said Lot 7, and also being in the South line of said Brittany Place; Thence North 89 deg. 26 min. 56 sec. West, along the South line of said Brittany Place, a distance of 50.00 feet to a point for corner; said point being the Southeast corner of Lot 3, Block B, of said Brittany Place, and also being in the South line of said Brittany Place; Thence North 0 deg. 33 min. 04 sec. East, along the East line of said Lot 3, and the West line of said Brittain Drive, a distance of 125 feet to a point for corner, said point being the Northeast corner of said Lot 3, and also being in the South line of said Brittany Court; Thence South 89 deg. 26 min. 56 sec. East, a distance of 50.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, and containing 6,250 square feet or 0.144 acres of land, more or less. This description was compiled from the information shown on the plat recorded in Volume 388-199, Page 96, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. L 7B-5 • L DIVISION TO TIMOTHY M. O'CONNOR AND M. LYNN O'CONNOR Being a tract of land situated in the Thomas H. Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of the 50 foot wide right of way shown on the Plat of Brittany Place, an Addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County, Texas, recorded in Volume 388-199, Page 96 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, as Brittain Drive, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 3, Block B, of said Brittany Place, said point being at the intersection of South right of way line of Brittany Court and the West right of way line of said Brittain Drive; Thence South 0 deg. 33 min. 04 sec. West, along the East line of said Lot 3, and the West line of said Brittain Drive, a distance of 125.00 feet to a point for corner, said point (60, being the Southeast corner of said Lot 3, and also being in the South line of said Brittany Place; Thence South 89 deg. 26 min. 56 sec. East, along the South line of said Brittany Place, a distance of 25.00 feet to a point for corner; Thence North 0 deg. 33 min. 04 sec. East, 25.00 feet East of and parallel to the East line of said Lot 3, a distance of 125.00 feet to a point for corner, said point being at the intersection of the centerline of said Brittain Drive and the South line of said Brittany Court; Thence North 89 deg. 26 min. 56 sec. West, a distance of 25.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, and containing 3,125 square feet or 0.072 acres of land, more or less. This description was compiled from the information shown on the plat recorded in Volume 388-199, Page 96, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. L 7s-6 c _____ _ (I; MN\ 8R/TT41/Y ;CON'T S 89 26'56" E 1 25.00' - - - - i I I Point of Beginning I o ) of I Lri I iri I I N N Lot 3 .....144 Lot 7 Block 0 \ Block A prit ton y fllacrt I C 1 I I Brit ton v Pinc:e voi 1RP- I nO "(7c1 � // .3Af3-•l'?'), r'ri c?6. f'li 1f:1 I I I i'f;'Ic1 w Q (IIII.'" 0 in of of I of 01 I Z cn I I 15. ilJity F7Ser-.,• tr I I I 15• iJF,lily Easernonr - - I 25.00' I _ N 89 26'56" W - O1 p. . , FiiCHnn;1r; h:'., 4-,87 r (11111.11?. Ibis plot wits rr <! („r;r, inl,rrnrition showr; on the r'' Qnttnny Place. rrnrl Adlition to the of Souliiinke Tarrant County, Texrt. .o•rried in V^?,IrnE. .388-199. -- Po;e 96, Plat Ri_ .•-jo, Tarr-not County, Texas. Richard C. Multi RF Prof t oral urvnynr Lrxrrs R•7a ilrr 45137 \` 7B-7 Ur1t‘'d: 6 / 98 • C DIVISION TO J. SCOTT MATTHEIS AND BRENDA MATTHEIS Being a tract of land situated in the Thomas H. Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of the 50 foot wide right of way shown on the Plat of Brittany Place, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, recorded in Volume 388-199, Page 96 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, as Brittain Drive, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 7, Block A, of said Brittany Place, said point being at the intersection of South right of way line of Brittany Court and the East right of way line of said Brittain Drive; Thence South 0 deg. 33 min. 04 sec. West, along the West line of said Lot 7, and the East line of said Brittain Drive, a distance of 125.00 feet to a point for corner, said point being the Southwest corner of said Lot 7, and also being in the South line of said Brittany Place; Le Thence North 89 deg. 26 min. 56 sec. West, along the South line of said Brittany Place, a distance of 25.00 feet to a point for corner; Thence North 0 deg. 33 min. 04 sec. East, 25.00 feet West of and parallel to the West line of said Lot 7, a distance of 125.00 feet to a point for corner, said point being at the intersection of the centerline of said Brittain Drive and the South line of said Brittany Court; Thence South 89 deg. 26 min. 56 sec. East, a distance of 25.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, and containing 3,125 square feet or 0.072 acres of land, more or less. This description was compiled from the information shown on the plat recorded in Volume 388-199, Page 96, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. C 7s-s (III:' --_______. _ _ -I ,BAP/TTA417 ,COURT S 89 26'56" E I I ( `. Point of Beginning I I I I IO I I I O O ,� I trj Ni. N Lot 3 • Lot 7 Block 8 Block A Brittany Place I I ( Brittany Place Val. 388-199, Pg. 96, . Vol3i88--1'1'%, P(7. ',f PRICT I I I l'P1r:I (111re I i Ipn o ( o I I I Z 1 to I 1.5' Vt:lity Eq,ern. i I I I t:i- 1; c.. liiily r.merr( ---I - - I 2,100' 1 N 89 26'56" W r. -'!�o'i,(; b1/,I ... This nlat was compiled form inlnrrnatian � / L shown on the PI-it of Brittany Place, and / Addition to the •171fy of outhlake, Tarrant County, Texas, recorded in 'Volume •388-199, ----------__-- Page 96, Plot Cacaxd;, Tarrant County. I9xa:. n c 1 rc,iar'i C. Maki Peg. Prof. Land ;!rr reynr Texas Peg. No. 4587 • These appendices are not conrdered s pan of this ordinance and may be revised or updated as necessary by the City Staff APPENDIX 4 Public Easement Abandonment by PIat Recorded public easement may be abandoned on final, plat revisions, plat showings, or amended plats which are approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council by the following, procedure. First, the statement and signature block indicted below should be added to the face of the plat. Upon final approval of the plat, the applicant shall obtain signatures of approval from the representative of each respective utility company. Signatures must be original for every document to be recorded - mylar originals if Tarrant County or mylar originals and blueline copies is Denton County. .Addresses and phone numbers of utility companies' representatives are provided on the second page of this appendix. The City will then obtain appropriate signatures from City and elected officials. We. tie undersi2:ed, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment of the easement so noted on this plat, said easement being previously recorded in Volume8697 , Page 409 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas.** Texas Utilities Electric Tri-County Electric Coop., Inc. Signed:M4 fit{ L. Signed:(kr' Printed Name: t/1ikf' 44,k Printed Name: 1i747, Z f5 Title: LA77L1 T`jL6311,eik Title: c1;2 Date: S 1 j 1 Date: 17 1--°J 4 C7 GTE Cen , Inc.aget.., Lone Star Gas Company SiT:ed: Signed:--I 2,44_ Printed Name: 1)41//4) /411-C-j(J Printed Name: Mt kF C 'c &1-c Title C_ , D 16 Title: U! 5 I t i)g Date: 5-2.2 7-7e, Date: c Jj Marcus Cable Signed: Printed Name: Title: Dace: L:tP(BWORXSWD.FILES\C 1.LT?'CTILLISTudlsigs.doc **Provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be interpreted as an abandonment of the existing utility easement located along the southernmost 15 feet of the subject property. 713-10 These appendices are not considered a part of this ordinance and may be revised or:tpdated as necessary fry the City Staff. APPENDIX 4 Public Easement Abandonment by Plat Recorded public easement may be abandoned on final, plat revisions, plat showings, or amended plats which are approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council by the following procedure. First, the statement and signature block indicted below should be added to the face of the plat. Upon final approval of the plat, the applicant shall obtain signatures of approval from the representative of each respective utility company. Signatures must be original for every document to be recorded - mylar originals if Tarrant County or mylar originals and blueline copies is Denton County. Addresses and phone numbers of utility companies' representatives are provided on the second page of this appendix. The City will then obtain appropriate signatures from City and elected officials. undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment of the easement so noted on this plat, said easement being previously recorded in Volume 8697, Pagt409 of theDeed Records ofTarrant County, Texas. "" Texas Utilities Electric Tri-County Electric Coop., Inc. Signed: Signed: �� �r/1,�iI Printed Name: Printed Name: 7 s)i U l , 7cLI- Title: Tide: 1'a�,r Date: Date: f,/k/ �f GTE Central, Inc. Lone Star Gas Company Signed:• Signed: Printed Name:Z)4V/t /tLL Printed Name: Title: Se-. b6516Ayj¢.. Title: Date: Date: Marcus Cable Signe Printed Name: e'r-,/ / Title: ��.."ai��h Dace: s /5 T L:'•?LBWORKS WD-FILES'UTILITY'G T ILLISTudisigs.doc Liw, **Provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be interpreted as an abandonment of the existing utility easement located along the southernmost 15 feet of the subject property. 7B-11 We, as residents of Brittany Court, concur with the request of Mr. and Mrs. Timothy M. CO'Connor and Mr. and Mrs. J. Scott Mattheis with respect to the abandonment of the land dedicated for Brittain Drive. SIGNATURE: PROPERTY OWNED: /, ---) _ : ,____, :7---') :- - "'--- 5? A(__ //51C L7y- t- -/7- ,--, C a.-f (' - ice i f%�' /?�, T`z y C . \J (L"L"�v / Lei/74-/1.,It. i 9/C/ 2�6�..-' d- / / / (I ��- 2/ -/ i rl�'/�/y(" • i / / j J • // // z-/ '1_7) . I I I 7, , L - ,,_, ( (. , /c.iii, iLD ;3 i' ; '---7//7 6<--. C--I `_� ��(1,,/ /S�/%1 PAl`/ l • 7B-12 ORDINANCE NO. 705 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING RIGHT-OF-WAY ON BRITTAIN DRIVE, IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UN-NECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; RETAINING A FIFTEEN-FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PARCEL; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO EXECUTE QUITCLAIM DEEDS RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, INTEREST OR CONTROL OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS. the City of Southlake is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Southlake. after careful study and consideration, has determined that right-of-way on Brittain Drive in the City of Southlake. hereinafter more specifically described, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public Le in general: therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment; and WHEREAS. in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said right-of-way, the City desires to execute quitclaim deeds releasing all title. ownership and control in said right-of-way to the owners of the abutting property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 The following right-of-way on Brittain Drive is hereby vacated and abandoned as public property: Brittain Drive located in the City of Southlake said right-of-way being depicted and described as Brittain Drive on Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached hereto. The right-of-way is not 713-13 being. used by. nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. The right-of-way so vacated and abandoned shall revert in fee simple to the owners of the abutting properties. A fifteen-foot utility easement located on the southern portion right-of-way being abandoned shall be retained. SECTION 2 The Mayor of the City of Southlake. Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute one or more quitclaim deeds releasing all claims to title, ownership. or control of the right-of-way on behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. SECTION 3 A copy of said quitclaim deeds shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County. Texas. by the office of the City Secretary. SECTION 4 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase. clause. sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases. clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. 2 78-14 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS L MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY Date: Adopted: Effective: I WP-FILE ORD"nI ORD.?D 3 7B-15 QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That the City Council of the City of Southlake, County of Tarrant, State of Texas. after careful study and consideration, has determined that the right-of-way of Brittain Drive located in the City of Southlake, hereinafter more specifically described and depicted as Brittain Drive on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding public benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. For and in consideration of the above findings and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Southlake ("Grantor") does hereby bargain, sell, release, vacate, abandon and forever quitclaim unto: TIMOTHY M. O'CONNOR AND M. LYNN O'CONNOR, HUSBAND AND WIFE ("Grantees"). and any and all of their heirs, legal representatives or assigns, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the right-of-way described on Exhibit "A" in proportion to their abutting ownership. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the above described right-of-way unto the said Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs, legal representatives or assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid right-of-way, premises or appurtenances or any part thereof. L 7B-is • L EXECUTED this day of , 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Mayor STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument ws acknowledged before me on the day of , 1998, by Rick Stacy, Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, a municipality, on behalf of said municipality. Notary Public in and for the (are State of Texas My commission expires: Type or Print Notary's Name (sr' 78-17 QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That the City Council of the City of Southlake, County of Tarrant, State of Texas, after careful study and consideration, has determined that the right-of-way of Brittain Drive located in the City of Southiake, hereinafter more specifically described and depicted as Brittain Drive on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding public benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. For and in consideration of the above findings and for other good Le and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Southiake ("Grantor") does hereby bargain, sell, release, vacate, abandon and forever quitclaim unto: J. SCOTT MATTHEIS AND BRENDA MATTHEIS, HUSBAND AND WIFE ("Grantees"). and any and all of their heirs, legal representatives or assigns, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the right-of-way described on Exhibit "A" in proportion to their abutting ownership. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the above described right-of-way unto the said Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs, legal representatives or assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid right-of-way, premises or appurtenances or any part thereof. L 7e-is • , L EXECUTED this day of 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Mayor STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument ws acknowledged before me on the day of , 1998, by Rick Stacy, Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, a municipality, on behalf of said municipality. Notary Public in and for the (re State of Texas My commission expires: Type or Print Notary's Name L 7B-19 . .- . . • •Lr..1••1"0-, .-,..: `NY-.'114 *r,:,..1 11 I 1v 11. 11,1 • z It i LS Ili ..- .ill: r: i z .., . .- . j,..........„ .„-,.. ; ',. ji .;• -:,1 . :.• , .6.-,,, i,,,. i . . ir.. .... .% • > ,... .i •:. . it 2 A.,: i .. 11 1 '.' 1!E 1 ; . I 1 2 2., ; • , . '5 :iii 11,.5 i• 2 i'.. - *i 7,--I' i •!I ' 3- A - 1 i 4-••1 • ii: e.r..1 1 • ..7 _ e - . j. ..:.i ; e NI ''';‘..' .•••• 3 3 iii:f i 4.'; ii.: i• 1 ,:: .0 j -5 2'7: ---, • -. ••••••• ' ...5.• ; ! cf.:, 11: i,::,,t. i .. CI : ,'"i ....._ ' ;' \.. ...-°.:• i I if.!N I i;: . A '.1 '•,..)..4.4.,I4:•!'• 'i II . 1 2 '.•;-. X j , ..: i! I • i: . ! :: . -i. •i-; ,. . : .••••_. : i• i -- , -- ---- •.,i.,.- - 1 - - - .-- Pri ri: • .. ' . t - : I i •': ' , I 54 :i. i ' .„•- .. 'i , , , . _ \ • :i • i ,,, u - i5.,i .-f .,•,- I .. \ :4 0 0 ,•,.. - ul ' . - , <- . L ,. - - ..,. ;[ . _,,,,.. .. _ ,._ . . , ..!. < celi •• X '1: . : .-.,. i,../ . i , < - F:4 , Li, •.: .; u. (i) • 1-• 1 Ei - _ : E.4 H . . . PI P x O• ; x i ,,, i —• — 1 u t 17 !. '' •• • 1 • : II I I •'11 J1)1' 1 !Ili; ., . , I &" ; 'I I \I ........... 1111! •.: ::: 4, :„..>....--- 2 C.) ' ••• • In .• x : z • , . .• ,,-1:1 .; i::-.ifi ' .4 0 E3 1 :.??1 r-I,se.,•4.: I ..c 'Z' 1 : -.1';:: • W.,. . ' •-- • U - 0 - Z L. 1;.11 ° N 1,• • I L'7'. • I ,, gi i 1.: 2 Z•-• 14 , 78-20 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT August 14, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-071 PROJECT: Site Plan /Lot 3R2,Block 1, Georgetown Park STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for proposed Lot 3R2, Block 1, Georgetown Park on property legally described as a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4216,Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas,and being approximately 0.84 acres. LOCATION: Approximately 800' east of South Kimball Avenue and approximately 200' south of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). OWNER: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and 75 LDN Overlay Corridor NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Gary Price (Liberty Bank), 2438 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. P&Z ACTION: July 23, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 17, 1998, waiving Item #1 a - d, accepting the plan as proposed and relocating the required plantings elsewhere on the site; stipulating that Item #2 (reciprocal parking agreement) will be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit; accepting the applicant's agreement to adjust the parking island in the northwest corner by eliminating a parking space and reducing the size of the building in order to meet the parking requirements;and accepting the applicant's agreement to incorporate the small Cedar Elms located in the south, east, and north bufferyards into the landscaping of the site. COUNCIL ACTION: August 4, 1998;Approved(5-1)to table and to continue the Public 7G - 1 City of Southlake,Texas Hearing to the August 18, 1998, City Council meeting due to the applicant not being present. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 17, 1998, with the exception of those listed in Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 14, 1998. L:\COMDEV\W P-F1LES\MEMO\98CASES\98-071 SP.WPD L C- Z ,c kodi , ,, h ri i I.-1 1 11 1 , L l i I 1 (ibii , . 1 , . . , . , L........, , / -N' Juagliwr roc .1/4._ 1 , . 4 i NtO 7 ! . c„.....„.„,. • 1 i 1 i 1 ,- 1 StaJ/16 '7 j' 1 1 I 1 I I i i 1 1,I \ 1 1 1----5004c 778- 1 --15; 005 En met _sa 41 al / is,NseceSs_ 1 / s , N ' ............ (053.77 f 0141 KO° 4 *- 11111 'cl°9 • Ill •jszaneerir , 1 i alCtifir-11 i ' 1 ;TS-. PO 1 TAIII SIFI3/4, Mir r 1 KiDcv"'' '! • 1 , ,--- tcP1 rfr , \--- --1 --Irce•-,J---, li 1 i ! ogcS 1 r\-----77 ' 1 1 ! i 1 i 1-- f\l ; i / r I\ I I ' 46111.1123Lt C 1 1 i le5 i 1 I i I I I TRACT MAP • 1 i ,..- -. A il 1 _. J I 12 P4f4( 11 1C3 1 _ • - 33 T?ACiT 10 I f1-1 1}1.) 2AC 3 1 1 1 TRACT 13 Z j TRACT 3A W E AN AN 3.98 AC I:11E , IRA: �\o s• F R R SA'525 3.725 0 25 1 1 \ . TRACT 131 TRACT 1A • .S LIBERTY; 1 2.993 AC C ROLL ISD 919 f 111��——-- - — — BANK. --r--��� GRAPEVIYE tOLLEYVLLL.E ISD 906 — �; ST H. EATON ;;ta. 7.1r _ gTEOFTEXq - R. LEE TR 2a.3a s TRACT 33 .% ` p PLLO n ��.452 STATE OF GkRy O 1i TR T. • 4.86 AC 1 1 3220 `TR 2-3A1 / 47®a 031 2 ,� n `A� TR I 4 " TR 2A2 `R�/A 1 1 2.53 AC •S6S G� i I TR 241 .,AG„ r O \J 1 (...., m - 2A3C G.M. NETTLETON \ I 23' TR 2A Z A1A TR _ 1.5 g AG TR 2A1A AC Z 3.225 1 C) u u TR 2?2+ H. CARR C-2 6.79 AC O TR 'A3A E. SHANKLIN • 1.10 AC 1 ( _, 13. TR 11 1 5.93 AC i 1 1 2 i 1 1 k 1 1 O F�, I 3 ADJACENT OWNERS 1 AND ZONING q Al 3SVHd 'NNW NMO.LHJ2103J 1 q i '�€ 9 .-..1 R6RL n r!vr(1.s8 I I • 11 p P. ¢ I .1 , ,�� .. L- 111111 . ..0,1,1 .t i_ a 1kr 7 ' • 040 414: - - -: ,ivis:11 ' 3 r I ?d43 [q a > , —. .. t d ; liti _ Diu rcryj�-!'m. - • 1110: • .. i .......:100.-. . g i .„% —-I, :i::; ,, .,*--t'',,,,,,-47:!!:.%. -1::.3341 T6; - r':. '8::4! . . i/ 1.01i.0;0i! .•. 8 rRr1 1° lit ± g °E -- :.-2 Q .i1 i : ' ill 1, \ ! s—, :. J CL CL ii i ! nla £ �I I ° \! 11 ,I;\ • I.; Z t 1,� 6 9 9 1 1p I , 1\' it: \a t f-f^ ;i; i I' i I I III ,� ;: „Y _ 1,.1 1 1 gal 's, I • � \` . 0 1-1.gI -I \�— : o r.r. i' its �10; ; +Z a W ,* F II;, �t i /ii ' $ of P1liI • , 1 - I' 39.z z —\— ill :a pIl ,:I:: h i; Ipl Ili. i I - ?Z P Z O ��I!'I I <r !'' fir! 99t ! !I • �\ \'. \ `I 1 1 1 - N� j/�'/ I Sr \\� \. !', I QIY.�iP °1i;; ttt1 I 1 W .1 1 +i 1 it 9 9 } 1 _ _ �ir \� ,.• , • i F (Z L Jl�� p y yj p f _- CL ... jit,- -..I._'- --- - .T! ‘ti\\ _z(7 _ • I — ' —r ;1 ,,V�� J'/.s4 I I ! QX l Q }I, I I - -1 1_ J .1�t I W N .. .. .. I1•1 .- t'.._..___.._.._.._.._..-.. ..�._..- I1 ' I! r ill ili ''....i Sr I a iiS�Isil j 1 ;i ['a ;::: •tz i4 . I r �, I ii t ! ; III I i;,. . . . r-1�,1 .—_ z l; i } _ i.,gal I �. ,` :ist !I Y I,y Ozt UI. �c ,,, 1� fl '=i �. ` a i;_ +3 i I• i Yg I,^ W8 Sit! ��i !IF ;; !4 j t) i Al L • I I yr gw 1�! 1' ! GEl 1 . t1t }} q 1T �1 O � Ili ;r I ! I ou i •-' p.f`1 f;; 9!' 1! l!! hii I- • 7 i , .lil!1 1 [I_ --_J-� I. 11�� ... I` 'r1vl ; • 8 ' K = ts 1 6q r L i H iiv u Y3? ha1a Ien, \: 7c5 • City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No.: ZA 98-071 Revised Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/14/98 Project Name: Site Plan -Georgetown Park. Phase V. Lot 3R2. Block 1. Georgetown Park. Phase V APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Realty Capital Corporation CnK Associates. Inc. 920 S. Main Street. Suite 170 2045 N. Highway 360, Suite 160 Southlake.Texas 76051 Grand Prairie.Texas 75050 Phone: (817)488-4200 Phone : (817)640-0100 Fax: (817)488 - 5257 Attn. Richard Myers Fax : (817) 633-3309 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/24/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 862. 1. Provide the required bufferyard lengths and locate bufferyards adjacent to property lines. The following variations are proposed: (P&Z Action 7/21/98:Accept the bufferyards as shown, but require the applicant to relocate the plantings elsewhere on the site.) a. The north bufferyard is relocated to south of the drive lane and parking spaces and is reduced in length by 27 feet. The plan complies the required plant materials for the required length. b. The west bufferyard is relocated to east of the drive lane and parking spaces and is reduced in length by 14 feet. The plan complies the required plant materials for the required length. * The remaining bufferyards comply with the previously approved concept plan and bufferyard requirements. 2. Provide the required 58 parking spaces for general office uses on Lot 3R2 (8 spaces for the first 1,000 square feet and 1 space per 300 square feet thereafter). If adjacent sites have at least 7 excess spaces, a reciprocal parking agreement may be obtained in order to comply. (P&Z Action 7/21/98: Accept parking as show with the stipulation that a reciprocal parking agreement should be provided to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.) 3. Correct the lot numbers on the graphic to agree with the approved plats. P&Z Action: July 23, 1998:Approved(6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 17, 1998, amended as noted above and with the following additional recommendations: 1)Accept the applicant's agreement to: adjust the parking island in the northwest corner by eliminating a parking space, reduce the size of the building in order to meet the parking requirements, and incorporate the small Cedar Elms located in the south, east, and north bufferyards into the landscaping of the site. 7G - c City of Southlake,Texas * The driveways shown are as approved on the previous concept plan. The building meets articulation requirements. Interior landscaping is shown correctly. The preliminary,water, sewer and drainage plans have been reviewed and appear to meet City ordinances and standards. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 75' LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * Prior to the issuance of a building permit,the Plat Revision, currently being processed, must be filed with the County Plat Records. In addition,a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire - lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment t: Tree Preservation Analysis cc: Richard Myers VIA FAX ABOVE CnK VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\REV\98\98071 SP2.W PD • City of Southiake,Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT) Case No: ZA 98-071 Date of Review: 07- 16 -98 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Georgetown Phase V(Tree Survey Review#2) APPLICANT: Prepared By: Georgetown Phase V Hughs&Associates Surveyors Inc. 5750 Rufe Snow Dr. Ft. Worth,TX 76180 Phone: Phone: (817)498-3511 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481-5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The Concept Plan for this development was approved before the adoption of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A. Because of this,the location of existing trees may not have been a determining factor when the plan was as being developed. 2. A protected tree shall be considered to be preserved only if a minimum of 75%of the critical root zone is maintained at undisturbed natural grade and no more than 25%of the canopy is removed due to building encroachment. * Tree#781 (8"Post Oak)is located in a parking landscape median but is next to a curb. * The applicant could adjust the parking landscape median in the northwest corner of the building to compensate for the cluster of Post Oaks that are located just outside of it to the south. * Although they are not protected, there are small Cedar Elms (1"- 4"diameter) located in the south, east and north bufferyards of the proposed site. If done carefully these trees could be incorporated into the landscape of the site. Indicates formal comments. * Indicates informal comments. 11111 17 1998 V 7G-8 • U 'Dwj'SaLVIDOSsb)1�� xai ruur►os sv 0 --+ ��IA g1�9et 1 �� _.�.w.�_...�, A IsVHd d MMo.I3JO1O J I a its, i - 1 iiiiii l � N3It,a 1s; `. iL qat pivi i#� lob 3 !!_ i 3 r blcq l qi i If ill 1l i z fie! 4: 11 IP lei ' f w ;# k X ~M1 q�il' Ff I II i 1b + i sf a14 i. � ' ' t !� a N.\\:\A,.:;V.it'se,- .'�� ! ! - s 4.f4 ,t rEir SS •Nk‘•‘- i', 7 t4P'A .',,'•1,;;;;,,, ;.;;- ----:',::_-,„ I : i r s �,i i!fd ���`..ALL 3 �*:�_ -,� _ 1 i-h -! l‘i.i! R 3 1 , l rr r\ ` s, r` :a15t1 rri ;: g ;i iirL l r E ly Limb {Z 4A ,z' itit. � t � . xsT . , ' a2 p Lltiiii` `ilMl.r rti . 11 LI (0, .. e_ ` i, ` 3 t NAYG x6t `\ " a r= i r 1 L"li :: :;? rii k � ilt � ' `� . . a., i6i 1E J rill rim — 1 r: . ipW ` ` � i ,t akr? ii • -`1 ` ara \ :f tE L i ;� \ �i!if 3iji 4 te \ k � } :1_ 1` — \ \ 1 ::::,,,,,,,,s4,,,,,\::::t4mixi13, ^ €4»/ IiiEl it3 iI1 ,a .rq7pp :f + i', ..li\\.% .33ill tiki �1 � ii i � ,,,,11 Ili: iii ip. __3 _ !3 k .� 1 3 .0 L`2`C i`r;Z`L C r r ( `` z'i.,- 3hlti i;s!"-``?P3` t•<Yi i ir£. itPtIsi )1\ I'll Cj�j y/�`: �:�` t,.�l Sr�,`����1 `�`,�,`.�`,�,.•1�.ac�C � ; 3 I siff,,1 i PIA qt r . airi i ., rriss-r-ssi" '"s sttli!,:,2 r la ii, .�� ,s 1+:41 „ +,8;1\ ,,,%, iT\-\\x,\\\\,,,,,,\\,. j a �3�y lily E E{{ i `gseL, ct ¢ t 3 tsiab3ta i i L23 QQ 11 1{ is 33 iii t A r i-. kaL�i iLtr .,i ,a??2+`t`L° i i� • , i• t'.,I4 l iiii a crr.o ;:f`` ` rli„� 3 i .Ea.,#ess�lf::�i�f31 t 9 '333 �� x aw - www�: !`.�`' L i Y� Y a a=. t o Y 4iH 3:i11 1>`is.`7i:` ra �, J Jr i`C lei A i Il It l:. .. }L i l f i i, i..,.. di -.3 il. -... ; �I r�� °r`. b i i:``:`.'?`t .z���`:,.,., ai LLr:o`F€ _lia fluiU11;1Jhi (h C ett ``` t--a:a�Lr3::.:a:.. t: r..`1,i,. - 11 ....a�a:a�°.:.oiii�oaaow o 1111 --- -75 i\ pB, Ii 3='= i - �3 $rtri tllvi a�t i i /I ifi{#i! 7G -9 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT August 14, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-081 PROJECT: Site Plan / Lot 3R1. Block 1, Georgetown Park STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for proposed Lot 3R1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, on property legally described as a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4216,Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas,and being approximately 0.89 acres. LOCATION: South side of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) approximately 800' east of South Kimball Avenue. OWNER: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. APPLICANT: Pieter Andreis Jewelry CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and 75 LDN Overlay Corridor NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • -Gary Price (Liberty Bank), 2438 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. (Received 7/28/98) P&Z ACTION: August 6, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1,dated July 31, 1998, deleting Item#2 (bufferyards) accepting the plan as proposed and accepting the applicant's agreement to provide the required plantings and open space elsewhere on the site; and accepting the applicant's agreement to work with Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator, in coordinating site adjustments to preserve trees with consideration given to the existing health and vitality of the trees to be saved. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated August 14, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-081 SP.WPD iD- 1 , /, 1- --, ' 1 ,---1 , 1 , --, ,-' -. --, st*O6 7'- 00 L\ kia / , 1 1---- , 1 1,-----,•\ \/ , , 1 , ! ! i i , , \ .,• _, , / / ---.., 4kTv') , "------- lie1'51,6;r-r-6:44',r 13. 1 'I ' I 1 1 I ,1 COU41. 1 , . . r I 7. . ; ht:RTHWEST WW1' EAST I . I ! , CEO ' "16P41 \Giell N.- rszzoerir _J . , 'I, . ;40 ws. P.' Ct1-4 . I . i i \ ,..i\• A**). r------ ' DO-cf04 ' i 1--__. Cr ?• 1 , 1 1 i .--7---7--- 7-----j • 1 , I i I j'A , r ----r---------L____\\ 1 I / ' ,T-7-7------'------1 ( , , , / ; ; 1 1,1 ,.,, / I , ! 1 IL7 1 r.., 1 ,,, , ! -iimff741-1---H--4 ;:i_ --- 1-----1 I,- I I i I 1 : 1 BustEss-,1 . i 113144 , ; I .----- -1-, •-:.• ___ TRACT MAP .. 13! 3t r-- TPA 10 I I�� 1.) I J TRACT 13 '2 AC i j lI Z ' �! TRACT 3A yV E EMAN 3.98 AC RE ( -- 1= 5' 5ug5 5 :la fI TRACT 131 TRACT 1 A 2.993AC ______ _._—_ LIBERTY_ --��f C C 20LL ISD 919 BANK ' ; GR-�PEYIYE-ICOLLEYti'ILLE ISD 906 . STgT IH. EATON ;1_ I SOFT .:-.` E4A8 r . R. LEE L �.. s '� �? TRACT 33 J 4 n •4,5 STq TE O•F `f C�� �.8s AC � � 1 r I r,� rt., - Q � Ztz t I.! I le • "C r t i A. 1 '1": f 2.33 AC I f -3,5 j (iii., O"AG" . I t , c G.M. NETTLETON Z "AG" i • r. t T' 2� TR 2-.'A t 5.73 AC Q 3225 0 1 i n m — „C-2" iR 2 _ I 1 H. CARR r- 6.79 AC i I O -'R '-'3A E. SHANKLIN t 1.1E3 AC I I t TR 11 1 5.93 AC t . I �, t 2 t �'` \\\ , , O , , , , 3 ADJACENT OWNERS nAl AND ZONING 1D -3 . 40' ./1 1; ...41..1./\I...1�I AN._, ....\:MI. .1... 11....1.a -- AI HSYHd )I'1Vd NAIOJ ID110HJ Ili h Iao I .11i .i i .--1 I1• RRRI 0" P!i}('(LM II t � I • 0. it y9 ; i a 7 tail) •,``'>'� yj ; w _ • i. _ e-'(it1—'Prn'x,_ -. Ga —• c -E ..§/ i 1,1,3.10/11 7:!:.: -...„Jr \:, --17. —----._. ,—.,-, .- ,,- r,. -1§; it' ijliii I.£4�Ipil�.I. 4'''' � �.� a\ i'I .\:::\ ..'•'\ -.: i . ii +o$ L.L III d ; d ;i i • -- � � \�` '`° 1 i I I Ii' 4G ;il _s � �r , �, tl\ '� \ , • �'~ I.1. 1 ! /�6r pl Y 1�\ t I.I I ',i I �41V;i ') t t • I�I 1`1`I tn� �.i ' • •\�� � \, .. '''� �I.I,1�j1t�ti4� �il su I•� \'t i�]]j +`'�'. j I! \ ��J�...1-.' ,r _ yyy—II F I I I•i I•I' i- � ;I �W ...14 I#1i94 ` 't II i�t\i �'\ �� iY� i I I It^I 11'•Iy lil'1 •• �.V �1)t1)� I , I•I � A\i - II Ho Z16�3t1�`Irti! !�1! I !._ t1; lct I •I'� }� '^,I 'r .It I� i 1" • i �1 j' \ p I I r .a •j L ' Z P. ,_ ; 17i I i ` t � :i!. ' -11 1 : is 'I' Iiiiq ' Id w-I ; 1 i ; ;; , 5:c'3� ,1 s 1 1 1 i;i1 AA 1 ,I (6., I Q • \� � � � I;t 'i / l8 \I „I , i Ot I �' I - \: �\\ • \ ! ' 2 Ni� LL\ \2 � .\\' .� ! G' O; w EE1 j I lt'9 4 „il i : —J: t li " � : _ ! 1 z : Q .I Y l 4 ' i \ r : 1 I ��' f_ - i z , I • xQ µ.'_ _._ _ i _ _ � \Lz____:. ________..1 � I S ,\= I : d w \i' j 11 _I WN II. „l';1 I le (1z j1 t1 '.51 IA IA ajjI LF In'PI ' I g8F I•~ ' .1 r .1 Y. I;I ,tIt i� $ a ; Y jl o �t �l ( ✓ t ! �� i ; � i � •t }I :( i ,.( , >1.i _ _ N 1 I II l 1 i, '' I( ' t = hi i i..i,'• �3 I; I I -irrr' --�I��—'� `-•-•-- i i I• °ao 0 i:�l �{'; }. r' t, ni ,, q , It. ! 1'r tI 1 _..__ • ( - go -B� __ 1 t aW ,Ili •!i 1, I 't i t , §d 9 l.i I Ili i; • 1Z � ' ii �a ; o 'I j , 1� i 1 1 --°---' (�13i1, I I ! I.i; ft. I; 1t! I>>= i g i I 1 ! ::. —.._ ._. ._...__I . i: 1 d .1 " L ,g14 i.°i1 %r w' 1:4 e.Zi,l/ll il•• -1 s:•g14 It. i , ' t ' I. i 11! 11.l 5 ` i R ii ; tvj li t t13 Ii i 4all IQbgii I. I • 10-q City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No.: ZA 98-081 Revised Review No: One Date of Review: 8/14/98 Project Name: Site Plan -Georgetown Park. Lot 3R1. Block 1 -Jewelry Store APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Pieter Andreis Jewelry CnK Associates Inc. P.O. Box 1380 2045 N. Highway 360 Suite#160 Roanoke. Texas 76262 Grand Prairie. Texas 75050 Phone : (817) 491 - 1910 Phone : (817) 640 - 0100 Fax : (817)430 - 1380 Attn.Pieter Hye Fax : (817) 633 - 3309 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/13/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 862. 1. Revise the tree survey to include all the information required by Ordinance 585-A. 2. Provide the required bufferyard lengths and locate bufferyards adjacent to property lines. The south bufferyard is relocated north of the drive lane and parking spaces and is reduced in length by 23 feet. The plan complies the required plant materials for the required length. (P&Z Action 8/6/989:Accept the bufferyards as shown, but require the applicant to relocate the plantings elsewhere on the site.) 3. Provide dimensions, location and other pertinent details regarding the retaining wall west of the driveway at F.M. 1709, as shown on the tree survey. The retaining wall has not been shown on any previous plans. 4. Provide dimensions on the building, use contained therein and the gross floor area on the graphic. 5. Correct the metes and bounds on the property boundary consistent with the approved plat. Remove metes and bounds not associated with this lot. 6. Note the type of pavement for F.M. 1709. 7. Label all entrances and exits to the building. 8. Show the location of any trash dumpsters noting the type and height of screening device. 9. Show, label, and dimension easements on or adjacent to the site as provided on any filed or approved plats. '0. Provide two copies of the entire complex showing all existing and proposed fire hydrant locations. There appear to be some conflicts between various plans submitted. 1D- a City of Southlake,Texas P&Z Action: August 6, 1998:Approved(6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 31, 1998, amended as noted above and accepting the applicant's agreement to work with Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator, in coordinating site adjustments to preserve trees with consideration given to the existing health and vitality of the trees to be saved * Note that the driveways shown are as approved on the previous concept plan. This site plan complies with the articulation requirements. * No sidewalks are required on this side of F.M. 1709 at this location. Previously,the Planning& Zoning Commission required a 4' sidewalk along the north property line of Lot 4, along the right- of-way,however staff does not recommend this stipulation due to the varied topography of the site. * This plan proposes 9 additional parking spaces above the requirement, however,these spaces appear necessary to accommodate shortages on adjoining properties. For adjacent properties to use these spaces, a reciprocal parking agreement is necessary,before a building permit is issued. * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA98- 081" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. NOTE: The applicant should be aware changes to the Sign (....„ Ordinance are currently underway. The applicant may want to meet with Building Inspections prior to requesting sign permits. Comments pertaining to signs(current ordinance requirements) from Building Inspections forwarded to applicant. * It appears that this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit the approved Plat Revision must be filed in the County Plat Records. In addition, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Tree Preservation Analysis Pieter Hye VIA FAX ABOVE CnK Associates,Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\REV\98\98081 SP 1.W PD 1 D-Co City of Southlake,Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT) Case No: ZA98-081(Revisior) Date of Review: 08 - 12 -98 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Georgetown Park,Lot 3-R-1.Block 1 (Tree Survey Review#1) APPLICANT: Prepared By: Georgetown Park Hughs&Associates Surveyors Inc. 5750 Rufe Snow Dr. Ft. Worth,TX 76180 Phone: Phone: (817)498-3511 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481-5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The Concept Plan for this development was approved prior to the adoption of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A. Because of this,the location of existing trees may not have been a determining factor when the plan was being developed. 2. The survey only shows protected trees that are 8"diameter and over. This is a very densely wooded site and there are trees 6"diameter that are not shown. I recommend that the contractor string line the building pad site and call for an inspection before any site prep work begins. This will allow us and them to truly see the extent of trees that need to be removed on the site. * No grade changes shall be allowed within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator or if grading is as directed by the city's drainage inspector. * Protected trees within twenty feet(20')of the construction area shall have four foot(4') high protective fencing surrounding the tree/s between the critical root zone of the tree/s and the construction activity area. All protective fencing shall be in place prior to the commencement of any site work and remain in place until all exterior work has been completed. R_F CD AUG 1 31998 70-7 A 3NrSiiiNDOSSY NINp Lr— • swat"3XYDLIIIOS - --c i 1 1 f 11 :I itl ID 31101S Alliatgl I i . MOVItt WI WM 01111004 WO a _ , . • I --- -- - , II li. ,1 t i 1 — II C iiiIiiimpli ! I , at at izi!1 1 -- — g fd: riii. IV I di , , g ---T-TaAlif ; I ' / ,i .i,, -Sit bild 11/ • I aiJi i . . i •-..... b — --- 3 -II 13 la 4 Pi/ a t ! i! Ili Willi --I- h ' II 1 i 11 ;i t .y . ii orir; I/ I 11" ,. P'• kills! co ' ----- iiiihi - --- i litbbot • ttip , - __ ' - ' iv — -- — --- -it ..... i 11111111hOil , .,„ - - :lb! tlit 5D : n..§ , m ._ P111111 -r 1/1 40-44-',t.44, -4 "1:„ it-, ::- oi.iii.,..k:. ___ i . _ . 1 ""or-iv, - -I • l , J '1 ' T: s4k N t t,s'::' 10.- r ii 1 ,\\•;. '••1",,`!Zhnk ii l - :';'''..77•4& ill --' ---. --' -- - - W 1 " _ , _ _ _ , -: klith,„*.. 's*ksZ ):7‘ irk-- - - - I, % Z-k'stk ks .'s.\*‘4. ,\‘'irrift,- f 4•V ---'-''--. , kW zz 4 zz l z a ,,*., ,4 /V ONN !;',% 1 g'9• • 0 1 ,fc, . N \- .,‘ \kif 14„/';;-- ,.,•...., 1 '; : iki clecz k ;,, A, 'N'' -14434.1, i'';7"'••taV: 5 II 1 i e I 1 Id 4 - k:.z.kl,kkt• •„;,%0,•:z..,,,,,,, .r, i „i, ,• ;,,,;, , ,..-ii. . ,;'''.;., --- (If it' II= 'iiii I!I .419 z,..:,_• 1 * -,., ;; 4 y \ • ,----;.. *.- '• k'',N,\ -,','"1/4-,., - li 11 ' i zs81: ,: .11 :. - 1 . 1 • ';>., .....Zak: N. . \s ‘\,‘\,e!, :MMZsl II IF/ /4 Zft4ks';4' , k00,t,,41 I - - !Iiiilli Tmr,,I,„ ill011 ibkk -,„ Wi , s: 4',;,--1ti? tm-%7411•N Li 2 Np• 1 ,, .-;Jr 7,s;=ffa:,,:,*I: '„'•.ttssIa8naVsir;.i M444-1, V i ' (0•1` :!s z,i,,.. ., ,„,+;„ ‘w=u;st -. ..'k:?,saatwk$ft *zk •* ...• i , ..•,,-',44, k`,"t....„,k,,,,,„.., , ,,4 , :,‘, , ...s.:4'.A k.kZ.k•kk: ::,.:W4ki:,:k.k,,,,,,k:',.f I ' "‘t?`11111‘s 41114:0 \i II 'PAtt tap i,1 rs,%,+411%sysli,s, 11108101v,,wil; „., I , %:4`k\ssk. Z4`,i.'W.i'“i L k+"Zk: 'arl: t s , • :s :,::A , lksksW \ . ::,.. i:\,,. / % (pi ,, rWI. ; ..z,z,,, e,i z ;8..k...,4 A..4.,, ,,,.v,,,,, ..:::\\•,, ,,,\,,,‘ A,.,„„z„„.,;,,.,.... ,, , ,„,,,;, ,,,,,,,c,.....,,,,sirN::-.4 4'111Zs, ,sksshits.. N.' ' ',;.‘V V \ \•`,Iti:.'•\' \-='"s4' ;;•:.:,•: -.'N zV' ' '' Iim ii.iii. -: .v • :,,,, .:,:,,:.,;,‘. ,5.-:',",-,''; l' i: t: W: : :=gg s,“11;: ': t' 1 1 Iltianni 1!N.,,‘• v iui-iIt % 1'kl :4!).2•A)::',!',',NA''''s=411•?'''''s4', , P:'Mtritt g V'4k is:iIMi iZty' , ,— ‘,1 , ,,fm -_,..,,, 4 t 0. MO:,sliTi. IS :0 s i-,4' • t tzu4tego,,,, I , •:,,,,, • . :sk ,'• N,'•i.; t :...... ,.1. `4".'.4.4. / I ZW'sZV Z; '• :'-ss:41" "'n '' 14 e` • ,‘c'tl,; 4U1 ,i: gv,4 k 4 i III ltr czpV 1-„Is N .,:„ ,..,V • ,1k. tl's i',%k 1; tv • I" ' .Z. ., Z•Z W: .141.*. '; % %es' W,z,t„-r 3,Aic....;.9,;.1 ' 4 sss•ts,‘--,N'", ".,^sli ;''s..,,' 4t teRAUts:j 14,::, 1 i , . ,sp , ti 1 '' • 4 4e,:iW 4tP 1.\,N .,,N•40 Mai W, pi --T 1 .t I ; 1 ;•'' 1 '' .%\.•. ',r, III ii i:U'i1311 vl. --------try tkz •kk '1.1 ZsZiisssr.414 , s-s - - kk•.1 , 1 , ,••• • s••s+:••k+• •;::`:` ' s i P e .tmutmutg ,sktgmto:,.; ,t,„ . Fs [i ig ilvt:•.•ill..1 1 It k r t: tt,...„,,‘ ;:muutgA,,utztzt:m z g;-4 „ a t ,.111. . - ,,iNkt;t: :u.--- :+:ut•=mp - — 1- :IV= g 44' . 4`4+:tsk•k k44 :1g=. ./r.-..4,k :.:Z.:‘;,kUt=te'kkAZ,k!:.'s i A\ ,g 41 . ., . 1 1 "-'11114E;*1--- ). 4, il 2 11. , k,„ uusmu, ;m114 :‘,. ist4,,t- ,:m.it:• crrkt: k M r; : k:. . .A:4t ss=• tilkAAAt ' •1, t:tgggli.q Mit4:Ai ., s- dr qedlb tt 41 liMisii*.iittil; . -gig i Ulu, 1111-:1 l't :kileMW giW* • Ali g fir Iniiiill. 1 IPARsigtagitagragatrig -,.. ,i,A,.t ,,. tg#.t..T.thlt.t..n.W.m._..i.Amt1.411\-4:e.u.. .,.A _ _ .F.' ith; 1 1 11111111M y 0 1 i!ill is IT c: C , 1 , . , .. ,. . I ;., .1.! ,.• rf rol • i i 110 Pa ti at kW 1 11-m4. i u .3Nrsaimpossyw snag.VAYMMOS el N :� ' MOEA2IEAGf I • a+ iiiie..ila v Q ww.wmww.w • Ci, 01 , ,, C', i i , ®t_ - - ill 1 I El ®NM i t_ 1 NM 1 ® ••. 111 ® ••� II - ® MI •.. ril :1 s : d . op:. 1 ®�::. r �i • i � p� I J I liii I\11X p1 .I::. • G •■ L NE t i = p toms. q7 I i 17' ' uluuuuI • 1111111.1 II I .. I ® ::. ®I::. ' ••. s .1 )11- II — `1111111 3 l�1 ■ui■uuiii 3 1 c , ,, i, 10- 1 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT August 14, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-079 PROJECT: Concept Plan / Lot 3, Block 1 Diamond Circle Estates STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Concept Plan for Lot 3, Block 3, Diamond Circle Estates, on property legally described as being Lot 3, Block 3, Diamond Circle Estates,an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-177, Page 7, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.02 acres. LOCATION: 316 East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709), on the northwest corner of the intersection of Diamond Boulevard and East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). OWNER: 2 Diamond Ltd. APPLICANT: James A. Zimmerer CURRENT ZONING: "0-1" Office District LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12) RESPONSES: Three(3)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Gary Yarbrough (Southern Home Realty, Inc.), 620 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. (Received 7/14/98) • Sara and James Mellinger, 919 Emerald Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, undecided. "To date, our experience with Mr. Zimmerer's project has been a positive experience, i.e., he has made the required changes we have requested. Evidence of follow through needs to be exhibited to ensure our concerns are met." (Received 8/3/98) • Richard O'Day, 921 Emerald Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, undecided. "Generally, the basic one story design of the structure is acceptable and preferable over a two story structure." See attached letter. (Received 8/3/98) 7E—( City of Southlake,Texas Nine (9)responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • David and Marie McGinnis, 1317 Westmont Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor. (Received 7/16/98) • Kim and Gerard Marin, 200 Ginger Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor. "Plans will look nice with other construction in that block." "Plans will be conducive to other construction in the neighborhood." (Received 7/16/98) • Deborah Butler Baynard, 605 Timber Lakes Circle, Southlake, Texas, in favor. (Received 7/16/98) • A.D. Morin, 1012 Diamond Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. (Received 7/17/98) • Steve and Amy Lakin, 400 Donley Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor. "Goes with current use and zoning and master plan." "This would be a building that blends with surrounding neighborhood." (Received 7/23/98) • Richard and Linda Morgan, 402 Donley Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor. "It goes with what is currently there, current zoning supports use." "It blends with residential neighbors." (Received 7/23/98) • Art Janes, 1330 North Peytonville Avenue, Southlake, Texas, in favor. "Go with current plan, zoning and other buildings." (Received 7/23/98) • Valerie Parham, 1204 Oakwood Trail, Southlake, Texas, in favor. "There seems to be a need; appears to fit current zoning; nice building plan." (Received 7/23/98) • Debbee Heldoorn, 1323 Byron Nelson Parkway, Southlake, Texas, in favor. (Received 7/23/98) P&Z ACTION: August 6, 1998; Approved (5-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 31, 1998, and accepting plans for the driveways as submitted and accepting the applicant's commitment to comply with the remainder of the items on the review. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 31, 1998, with the exception of those in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 14, 1998. L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-079CP.W PD August 3, 1998 Dear Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission: RE: ZA 98-079 Generally, the basic one story design of the structure is acceptable and preferable over a two story structure. The front of the building appears to be aesthetically pleasing and the light colored brick and dark roof seem to be a good contrast (I would not be opposed to a slightly lighter colored roof tile). I believe the rear of the building lacks a pleasing architectural design. In addition, adequate rear landscaping is of course vital to the acceptance of this plan by those residents of Diamond Circle Estates who are to be affected. Mr. Zimmer, the developer, has been willing to work with the residents directly affected by his building, however we have not talked for four weeks and have yet to see a revised plan for the rear of the building addressing our concerns. Once I see a more detailed plan for the building design, I will be in a better position to make a determination as the the acceptability of this project. I regret that I am unable to attend this rescheduled meeting, but I remain available with a minimum amount of notice to talk with Mr. Zimmer about his plans and remain optimistic that we can reach acceptable compromises to any areas of dispute or concern. Thank you for your time and consideration. Rich ODay, 921 Emerald Blvd. Southlake, Tx. 76092 L RECp Uu o 3 1998 1- E-3 in I; s � i \\. Mom► , ill ~ -I °F k CP S- Saga: I I u_nIn.iiiM!`. 1.41131 L 1 -0v/ta • LI .4 _A. lAtip. ... rda. loam- -Ngill El FATPIN .., _ � •u 1 • i illA ) / ! \OW' 1 1-76gesi i , 1 rni 'Igo °P'j �� )11! '' i t I IA. L I7 "in-.4�ei \ li an :S • W ..,-.. . I i HALL , a_ I I , / We' F 1 1 , 1 i 11--\ .40.11e?- i ; , ,E,6, , ,,,,, .......„....,E.,„. ! :,..ot 4 i 6.4 I r : , , , r___, _______Li. esior ,4130_ ! i : i , , . , . . \.1. .„__.____ ______j________ , , , , / : h____, 1 , il 1 r it Z-T11111 1 ..........„•,-,..„0,.*_.,.:‘,._ . ,, � i ' i I [YnroiI�� iti11 I; �Pc, I I i � i +'. ARY - N. -I.- :iA� .1 / , i TABrill I i f / Al. wry ' i /I 4..13 � ���� Ij I , :1;1 ' 0013C3- LT,I ,:,.1.1 if-H t Weal , I =1'; z /P 'i di‘.... -) C/ 7 TRACT MAP 7 t J I I TR 3E s - 23. �SBZ Q ` e 12 11 10 "S F-1 A" 8 ¢] g Z P L O "SF-1A"- o 5 m 4 O 10 7C I— D " J. WOOD I m I R. O'DAY 11 110 / Tk' 3E2. COLT . S. HUMPHREYm c,a m = t 2A _ _ ,. . . �� / \\\ `� `87__ _ "C-2" ci z - - - - DIAMOND I LTD. C ' I - r 1 r23 L _ _ — � �� _a �2 / 1 TR.3E1 l .205 - - —SOUTHLAKE BLVD - - - - - - - / TR 3,121 ' - c— TR 5C .053 C ' 1.942 CTR 502 Do g 1.698 AC C) > - m TR 20— _ So m m ' 1, p Z D D 26 t � —1 ?LACE 2.132 AC "R—PUD" R m I , TR rA Q / a 2.95 AC Z I 1A3 .81 0 i B TR 5D28 11,1 L, 2.78 ® $ 992 2A ADJACENT OWNERS AC e AND ZONING -- - i e-s 2C City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 98-079 Review No: Two Date of Review: 8/14/98, Project Name: Concept Plan - Diamond Circle Estates. Lot 3. Block 3 APPLICANT: DESIGNER: John D. Zimmerer Peterson Designs Inc. 6528 Circle View Dive 5956 Sherry Lane# 1000 Fort Worth.Texas 76180 Dallas. Texas 75205 Phone: (817)269 -9448 Phone:(214) 691 - 1244 Fax: (817)656 - 3946 Attn.Jim Zimmerer Fax: (817) 577 - 3388 Attn.Don Peterson CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/10/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 863. :tv 'X:+iYf v. W....xvN'N.V.•.v:..vh9f5:. 4:N:•..• 't.•.N. 1. The following changes are needed regarding driveways ingressing and egressing the site. NOTE: This plan proposes access to public rights-of-way from two existing driveways, west of Diamond Boulevard, and appears to increase the daily design volume of the driveway(s)by 20%or more requiring that these driveway(s) comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634 : a. Driveways intersecting public rights-of-way used by this site require a minimum stacking depth of 75'. The west driveway in front of Holt Dental has approximately 42' of stacking. The east driveway in front of ReMax has approximately 37'of stacking. (P&ZAction 8/6/989: Accept driveways as shown.) b. The centerline of the existing off-site driveway intersecting F.M. 1709 to be used by this site must be a minimum of 500' from the intersection of Diamond Boulevard. The east driveway in front of ReMax is 191 feet from the intersection. (P&Z Action 8/6/989:Accept driveways as shown.) c. Spacing between full access driveways along F.M. 1709 to be used by this site must be a minimum of 500' apart. The existing two driveways are full access and spaced 255' apart. (P&Z Action 8/6/989:Accept driveways as shown.) d. The use of common driveways requires the dedication of a Common Access Easement on each affected property(Driveway Ordinance No 634,Section 5.2.e). The C.A.E.from the adjoining property owners on the west must be filed of record and provided to the City prior to issuance of a building permit. NOTE: ReMax submitted a letter stating their intent to grant an access easement if the site plan is approved. C le-(o City of Southlake,Texas 2. The following changes pertain to bufferyards,screening and landscaping. NOTE: The applicant has C provided more detailed information regarding landscaping than is required at the Concept Plan level. Staff has reviewed this information and finds the following changes are needed: a. Correct the"Provided"bufferyards as follows: North length to equal 167' East to reflect 28 shrubs South to reflect 22 shrubs with superscript reference to"Other Comments"No. 1 West to reflect a 5' Type 'A' Bufferyard Please note that the applicant has indicated additional canopy trees to be provided in the south and west bufferyards and additional accent trees to be planted in the north and west bufferyards. The applicant should clarify if this is the intent or if this is in error. b. Provide a minimum 6'wood stockade fence along the north property line with the finished side facing the less intensive use as required for the"F-1"bufferyard. This plan proposes using the existing wood and brick fence(height varies from 5'to 7')north and adjacent to this property rather than adding a second fence. Staff recommends that if the use of the existing fencing is acceptable, the applicant should provide the City a written agreement from the adjacent property owners and the Diamond Circle Estates Homeowner's Association indicating their understanding and acceptance of the use and maintenance of the fence prior to issuance of a building permit. C c. In addition to the"F-1"fencing requirements a minimum 8' screening device is required along all property lines adjacent to residential property(Ordinance 480, Section 39). d. A minimum of 75%of the required landscape area must be provided at the front and sides of the building. Staff has estimated that approximately 50%has been provided at the front and sides of the building. Insure that the required landscape area and plantings are to be provided. 3. Verify the square feet in the building. The medical and general office square feet combined(11,723) are greater than the total (10,713). 4. Parallel parking spaces along the east portion of the building must be a minimum of 10'x 22'.Parking spaces and/or loading spaces cannot encroach into a required fire lane. Although specific parking requirements are not normally evaluated at the time of Concept Plan Review,based on the floor area shown by use (7,762 sf office + 3,961 sf medical = 11,723 sf total), this site is deficient 7 spaces. Based on the overall 10, 713 sf shown and having 3961 sf of medical,this site is deficient 3 spaces deficient. Insure that required parking is provided. 5. All fire lanes must have a minimum interior turn radius of 30' and a minimum exterior turn radius of 54'. P&Z Action. August 6, 1998:Approved(5-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 31, 1998, amended as noted above. 7 E-7 City of Southlake,Texas * The proposed cellar is for mechanical equipment and storage for the principal users,only. The space may not be leased. Additional parking would be required to accommodate any users. * This plan was submitted prior to the adoption of the Residential Adjacency Standards Ordinance No. 480-CC. * It appears sidewalks are not required on the north side of F.M. 1709 in this location. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of the site plan. Note these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on the north, east, south, and west building facades)per§43.9C l e, Ordinance 480-S,as amended. • Masonry requirements per§43.9C l a, Ordinance 480-S, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and Ord.480-S, §43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43-C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13; and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in Ord. 480-S, §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Residential adjacency standards per Ord. 480-S, §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as amended. Please be aware that a single story structure greater than 20' in height(measured by UBC height standard)will require that the structure not encroach above a 4:1 slope line extending from grade at the north property line. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480-S, as amended. • Off-street parking and loading requirements per§35 &36,Ordinance 480-S,as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480,as amended. Parking is not permitted in designated fire lanes. • Mechanical units,satellite dishes,etc. must be screened of view from Adjacent right-of-way and/or residentially zoned or designated properties. This includes equipment on the roof,on the ground or otherwise. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. Exhibit forwarded to applicant. 7 E-S City of Southlake,Texas att: Tree Preservation Analysis Denotes Informational Comment cc: John D. Zimmerer VIA FAX ABOVE Peterson Designs Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98079CP2.WPD TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT) Case No: ZA 98-079 Date of Review: 07 - 9 - 98 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Lot 3, Block 3, Diamond Circle Estates Addition (Tree Survey) APPLICANT: ENGINEERS/PLANNERS: James A. Zimmerman Peterson Designs Inc. 6528 Circle View Dr. 5956 Sherry Lane#1000 Ft. Worth, TX 76117 Dallas, TX 75205 Phone: (817)269-9448 Phone: (817)691-1244 Fax: (817) 656-3946 Fax: (817) 577-3388 THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT(817)481-5581 EXT.848. GENERAL COMMENTS: C All the trees on the lot are located along the east and north property line. Even though five of them are a protected species,they are not smaller than six inches(6") diameter.None of the trees are protected. 2. The Cedar Elms along the north property line may have some aesthetic value by providing a screen for the adjacent home owners. But they are growing in the crack between a retention wall and the ground, and could destroy the retention wall as they grow larger. C vuJ►.,.V_k.-II1 j u.i I► 5 :AWE �o ••° I � II3I'Ia�g , I 113 14 cal glifili 311114! ( g 1 lilt ir" $ a 1 . , s, Wji t a i tip= ►� J t s atZ 1 6t* t� 1!IIi' aL� ! 0 'Si _+>�' - 1 '' °d,'I g e I �li I N� IE z. Iv!'f aa-t6?! V- �"•' i� j i E 1° 1 ¢ i gs . 1t 3 . sA Ef !� a..ji ' Et,.1} - s' . 4t a ill'? ;T 92 i ° na►:,tid 411- i li `=— I > ki UIIIII III IIIIIIIIIII, J sd at2a,ph-..ea a r #"?:a'7 t c tit111111 'V 1 f 11“ fae i iJ{ 1iflIi i (;.iii hgliel . I i; t / o iw0 .1 1 -oril a � . d _� 's3Ahl I I _____ liCetir- g _ 3 F I a' N b Sg It—I I 1iL� s� Iai ,. I _ J ,/ a --------------L---- ��...,\ Ate0dr 7Y79Yldri f YAM&VOA'," , ANA _¢ ' r N i . * c — 0: s — 101 a i . "•• %L§ -'1 �1 w 1 1 as vui rV_ 'wy7` ii) ! 2 � a l! n ^ SY 1'a 31 a=.,11 g} 1; I «e — f--J M "4 a B it r !� i ss K i u,• t > 09 A 3ig'iS $fq�$ 3 v ti 1 = a ab F� ai . ..,,..i , ., , .. , .,,-, -,,,,,, • • •• •2;/,,' .•••••• .: -,''" ,;':; /7/../,' •'' • ',:'•/•.;:: :::- /••2'..4-/•"',4.' ';;');''Y';',4'/1/./Ar.'' " ''' its L ..%Vf''''''. . .;.:.>/''' /''W///..' /:' .- 7 7//'/ A/ /./•M ;;',/ '//////P// //. //r/Y ./y // 1 IN1 ...kr _ 3¢ I I _ _Y ti I3 T� N. 1 Y/" j al r %' Ike a'/ % • Na a:/ , t- , Ili/ 1 /-4://51. r- — •.. 1 /= .'?^i lhii ♦ z e -:-.;si. 1_,,_ , _, n ,=-,_;_.,/,, .. ,, , i ..-.7 zi 1 i"is ilk d t. Cl- LzØN- Et % //// =_ :::"71-.,/:::./1 -. - \ n_ 1 111 ray 1 _ _J-�` r City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT August 14, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-075 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-287/Second Reading/ Rezoning-Loch Meadow Estates (submitted as Wildwood) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner,481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as Tract 2B and a portion of Tract 2B 1 situated in the Rees D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, and being approximately 30.058 acres. LOCATION: Approximately 250' east of the intersection of Ridgecrest Drive and Woodland Drive. OWNERS: Anthony and Jo Ann Scamardo APPLICANT: Larry Cole Investments CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen(13) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200'notification area: • Eric and Sue Wong, 3007 Ridgecrest Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "We are opposed to the request for the following reasons: 1) To build houses on these 1-acre lots,too many trees will need to be cut down; 2)Conversions from AG to SF-1A will diminish the rural character of the neighborhood." (Received 7/21/98) P&Z ACTION: July 23, 1998; Approved (6-0). COUNCIL ACTION: August 4, 1998; Approved (6-0) First Reading. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-075Z.WPD 1 F-l i- i ___7 • -, I i , \ . , 1 , \ \ : , I \ . t . - ,. , ..„ • • d• . s , , eg .. • , •___. ". \ sP,'( 1 ..., I ( . ...-.. 1 _72 ,----,---, \ \ f /Hoz p,-;---cs , \ \ •\.. ,..... _,,--,-,- !vit...L 25 1 ,.. __---- ,, \,....:, .. \ . .4....,, 1 1 1(134‘3-PDC) t` ,,',1 ' I ,v-i•1 6. "..--4.7- ; , * ; \ ; ; ; • \ 1 r.,,,s_GN ill / , T.;'. .-- -1 \ 1 : :: • \ _ , -_--\ • / I \ ' ' x, .! n I__ S ?-4 ; 1 ; \ i i, ; 1; - • - \• N , E51 P1/4 I __ C2 ‘-- •.\ , i I 1 E----,, . I ! 0.Y.,- ',---,! i I . ..4."- ,1111 a."43 \ I . \II I ,I 1 1// \ i_____]7; r : iI is?c,3, , '1 IT-1' c!)PYS----(7_,, i , , . . N•I / ; \ ..---1;/ 1034111i I \X . ilt-Ikl- si, i I • ,c.... , \ I ! 11 li _y.\<.--- , ; I CAAROLL 051 .12 --- \\ urziE -- , \ \, I . , ,...)„......, 1 bilavo .,I \ 1 , I, Ac), asr_nacsr 5 xitS-- -Fi— ; 1 ! ! I f { I 1 I , ! 1 i 1 .01, 1 1 1 : i . . i •. I i ! I 1 I I , 1 L4301 i .,r44 I --' i 1 Ora_1! ! . 1 . i . I I PktPiTY1..j I 1 5.-0"1, 'I _ _., "I'll,, ; 1 i I I i i I I TR A rT MAP --1 , --i I R-2.- 1 - 'I ! I i • , / to •R 13 UMTR 6 I 3R2 I 46.81 AC \ •\ . • LP' . "SF-20B" I � \___,-- SOUT' .1 U.S.A. • IIc • 1 E 4 • c 2R I j� 9 I \ j' 1 2 • 5 m R. PARKER , 6 si 6 i \ •- • 39490 a 'z 7 1 p� 17 8 5 , 38 a N J. , a • • 11 SCAMAR DO _ 4e 10 ° i1A "° 5 A� 1 . • R' • RBY I. tio Z \4A 12e 1 G j . . t- 1.4979 0 -• i • • i 12R-1 )6 2.398 0 1 IN l (110": L.ANDERSON' 3.7014 0 L ' • TR 28 ,- _ 1 TR 2C 1 W 1=1 1 Cli •. 58 0- 9.8 0 - 16.2 AC o! 1 �1 "SF-1 A" i U.S.A. i F. j ,...ENj 1 tal 12R-2 1 1.) 2.398 O • 1 w- s, 1 r f, - 4 ,, . a E. WONG i �j I WI - E12R-3A i o 1 1.354 0 : 11:1:1::: R. MCPHERSON i ! D 24.8039 0• 1 1 • 12R-38 ( r.— .: ' - "AG" 1 • 1.000 - j _ - — G. PITMNA' _ J.COKER - 1' 12C 1 -i 1 D TR 104 - ---'-'T = . .0437 O TR 1C1G 1 O 2.56 AC U.S.A. I = 19 (Pi • R.THOMPSON - CO.. m TR IC Z TR 1C1H AG , I G.TEMPLIN •08• ( - , "SF-1 A" ADJACENT OWNERS ER S AND ZONING •, �.NIv lr 1 5.82 AC t r.�3 '/ 1 , . -- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-287 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 2B AND A PORTION OF TRACT 2B1 SITUATED IN THE REES D. PRICE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1207,AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 30.058 ACRES,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by G:\ORD\ZONING\480.287 Page 1 1 F-N Lthe City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly Lrequires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, G:\ORD\ZONING\480.287 Page 2 1 F6 Lis hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 2B and a portion of Tract 2B 1 situated in the Rees D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, and being approximately 30.058 acres, and more fully and completely described in exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; L., to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.287 Page 3 Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any Ci and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance,and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G:\ORD\ZONING\480.287 Page 4 1R7 C APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C C G:\ORDIZONING\480.287 Page 5 1e-5 EXHIBIT "A" Being a tract of land in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a tract of land recorded in Volume 9057, Page 543, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.Co. ,Tx. ) , and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found Corps of Engineers (C.O.E. ) concrete monument number 232-4 , said concrete monument being the southwest corner of a tract of land convey to the United States of America as recorded in Volume 2378, Page 537, D.R.T.Co. ,Tx. , THENCE South 89 degrees 20 minutes 50 seconds West 724.89 feet to a set iron rod in the east line of the South Park Addition as recorded in Volume 388-11, Page 8, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, (P.R.T.Co. ,Tx. ) ; THENCE North 01 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds West 1,912.69 feet with the east line of South Lake Park Addition to a found iron rod for corner; (re THENCE South 86 degrees 27 minutes 43 seconds East 257 . 38 feet with the south of South Park Addition to a found C.O.E. concrete monument for corner; THENCE South 88 degrees 41 minutes 22 seconds East 531.39 feet to a found C.O.E. concrete monument number 231-1 for corner; THENCE South 04 degrees 39 minutes 03 seconds West 494 .57 feet to a found C.O.E. concrete monument number 232-1 for corner; THENCE South 21 degrees 13 minutes 46 seconds West 211 .89 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 22 degrees 46 minutes 14 seconds East 211.89 feet to a found C.O.E. concrete monument number 232-3 for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 42 minutes 42 seconds East 890. 21 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 30.058 acres of land. Co/ G:\O RD\ZONING\480..r Page 6 -7F-R • City of Southiake,Texas (re STAFF REPORT August 14, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-058 PROJECT: Site Plan /French Square Office Complex STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for French Square Office Complex on property legally described as Tract 5E situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being approximately 6.1441 acres. LOCATION: South side of East Southiake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) approximately 1,100' west of Byron Nelson Parkway. OWNER/APPLICANT: David L. Ford CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: June 18, 1998; Due to Case Resolution No. 97-22,this case appeared on the agenda but was not heard and was continued to the July 9, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. July 9, 1998; Approved (6-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the July 23, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. July 23, 1998; Approved (6-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the August 6, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. August 6, 1998;Approved(6-0)subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 31, 1998, accepting Items#8a, b, and c, (parking) as proposed; accepting Items #15a, b, and c, (building setbacks) as proposed; and accepting Item #23 (articulation) as proposed. ri City of Southiake,Texas cy, STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1,dated July 31, 1998,with the exception of those in Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 14, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-058SP.WPD C r16- %iiiiifkrA4i 10, aa46.,,Iptqa -- Ni 4b _i_ ' I I I souilrra.1 Goi) _,_. i I 114 84 %Jr- illin i ____,.?,4,. .x_Et:___,I ..CF 000:0-CIL_____7: A ASS I 1 ..,, , 04 i ! are :.• ,„,..,,.,.,. ,1 HA .7.-rf;,mvg.,__, i, 0- i i E — _ — 1 Its imal-. . ! I -- ,, Allb6 .—____044_-_, __., ! Illk, ,,,.-, ' Ivo eV1/4 1 - 1 - I II \ ‘ / IP ' t ,..(' 11T71. _erisl°41°- .0 i PO ilicr14 1)1-1,r\F 7-A-2. . sof. 1 ''------7------ill 1114 W.L. _,• a az,.....„. i r10- • _� I *r- ace/94ADY kk ; I \ I 1 F(177- 4E1C-93274ISEIL11-11511'' ►�/ 1 -1 . .ii I Pr I I 7 0 G 1 toe.w� �'1 PS 1, 1 ' _; -'14si _•tee 1 / . v g ,I ` I _ '�/ R ARY i 47 i Htl- ------- III ESi � P 1 / ► P , i. I WA I I i t ii/ / L ti!*4JI OA — A ird '': .40momdiA . , „ . , ,.; r"' /./, .11 at Ix% Will /0 ill'i : !, 1 Aki%Alaimo riii‘41m01106.444,,,tiiiilitill 'milk. ‘t Tri• _ art���Ini � Atiiiiiir il I'll. � , i< TRACT MAP TR 3 W. HALL • 10A 1 IA7_. - - -- —1 "SF-1A"D t 3A 4.47 AC SURVEY A-687 1 q 2A 108 118 61 28 J.M. cuSTEV SON TR 1 .409 AC r 18 i 28 (ll'e- — B �i� .Tz� a STATE OF TEXAS .STATE OF TEXAS "AG" TR 5D1 TR 502 2.365 AC 1.698 AC TR 5D2B 2.780 WESTERRA TIMARRON >n "AG" TR 5F - R 5D 1 B 10.0AC TR5D6 3.9480 5.351 0 TR 5D3 1.68 AC CITY OF SOUTHLAKE S. GARRETT I a a WESTERRA ''7 TIMARRON ` AOKWOOD DR e b 4, w 24 i 0 z r ,>n. q � 12 33 8 34 a .AG. � :Ii 25 i O rye a -R 2A2 WESTERRA TIMARRON 1.19 AC B pa ¢ 1 . .k ize B. SMALL TR 2A5 i 26 d l« ` 2.398 AC TR 2A3 ' 96 3`� 4.712 AC ¢ Za1� rR 2A1B "R-PUD" ri , 4 . .97 AC .yh 247 11 O j -.,,Z.a 731 V 41 h^ 13 • 14 s 120 41(V TR 2A3C ..---•••\ 1310 i +* O c5 1.93 AC CLAYTON CT % '- ° F ft 9 i O A 5 I. n s �M o 8 ADJACENT OWNERS r 10 � . , a k AND ZONING BRYsnTx m.v • — — � ' � $ ftlL7r 11111 rim%woo ANtlMfaA ifwMU10P f0 ADO 93f1.4 MIIM UNION DMZ s`M VW/KW LOOP= 83OIdA0 N30NVO 3)IV1H1ti0S I( liii kor' i 1 • i I i I � ' I. If i i f11 i iir ! I: I --L_ - - -1_ I. Li: CL i. . . 11 w aw•r.. ...r. I 1 ; I II IjIC — 4 I 1 ■ ces - i 4- M 1 it I • ,, 1 .._..—.. 00 ' ft I� LIII • I ; sIIIhIL ,1t!, ( � � - trI4Eig I I I'I: :: I . 11 I 1 l t I cl- cIII; I ! I1 Hi il le Pi lTh ill III �__ ,s.. ; g �a_ 1 Eiu- �; �s, _ _ 0 .1.-: I sss s - z Ia+ : 9g O i3It5HI is I ' U i U („ . (III I1111111 1 1 .11I 111 l [ !g �— -�}�.. , �, • 1._ ' cc t1/1 b `a it 6, gip i ae! i t1 \'m 1 :I Q t�,tQ.al 4 t I I ; ' �� I . cn � • � gY1 .1` Z11 .'i ,,,, J ss I e ' I m ii ee gel..1 bp s. .- gill 4 hutal:pi „, in 5 pj . 111. -- 1111111111111111R CC - .�1,jaslf 1gP y��a 'gee I t a , • t- ! p I I I I I I i o a a sl I ~( 7 P. _19 ;1.e. •f. ei re�., slII I = .1-1 3 4ie1011 iBs gfes1 [yI 1 111 It :_, o i \ _ = L fp cn 1 Id illi°1b14e$al lRh qlr iillif (Ilk pi -A [ \ �,' f �in Pela13 dteal itieer r _ .•,N — B gr _ o,• \ 0 ! kirIC0-04, II1 11,III r y Itif _ Z it ( � 7 �1,/�, ' ion z a i ay, r I�1....1 •, O Ni JIB i m� � e orO i 474 a ;�.:; CC . 11 33 1, • ig ,, 4 •I ,a `*�C�I��fit• ; a,,� — — —I i loll al ..; ; ..4„, -g _ -1—--:----ii i: ii! I! i lent ' ' U L., i i il i ' .aw.r.w • .warr• I III U HI 3 I I I i i IA) ; \ ; I ; I ; I 4 I ; Ill!: i — • iIi: i 1 g -- _ --G--e -, 1 � '7 • City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No.: ZA 98-058 Revised Review No:Two Date of Review: 08/14/98 Project Name: Site Plan-French Court Office Complex-Lots 12. 13.& 14. O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition.being 6.1 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey Abstract No. 899 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: nest Tex Custom Homes J.E. Levitt Engineers.Inc. p.O. Box 1702 726 Commerce Street. Suite 104 Roanoke.TX 76262 Southlake.Texas 76092 Phone : (817)481-0335 Phone: (817)488-3313 Fax : (817)430-3620 Attn: David D.Ford Fax: (817)488-3315 Attn: John Levitt CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/07/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. (880). 1. Correct the boundary bearings and lot numbers to match the plat currently in-process. The following changes are needed with regard to the bufferyards and landscaping: a. Coordinate with the City Landscape Administrator on the existing tree credits noted in the bufferyard and interior landscaping charts. Some of these credits may not be allowed if easements or grading endanger the survival of these existing trees. b. Provide bufferyards and plantings in compliance with the attached charts. * The bufferyard and irrigation requirements were waived on the previous Concept Plan approval for the area south of Building A. 3. Label the type of surface material and width for the sidewalk adjacent to Building A. 4. Common Access Easements are required only along the common lot lines from Parkwood Dr. to the west property boundary. Increase the width of the C.A.E's to 38' near Parkwood drive and to 27' near the west boundary. This will insure that the C.A.E.'s extend 1 foot beyond the both sides of the common drives * Driveway locations, as shown,conform to the approved concept plan. 5. The following changes are needed with regard to parking and loading areas: a. Provide sufficient parking as required by Ordinance 480, Sec. 35.6-b.-(6), 8 spaces for the first 1000 sf of each building,plus 1 space per 300 sf of remaining floor area(General Office).A total of 243 spaces(81 spaces each Lot)are required based on the use and floor r7G - 1 • City of Southlake,Texas area listed. The applicant has requested that stairways,non-leasable lobby,restrooms and janitor areas be exempt from the parking calculation and has provided 226 spaces with 207 (69 each Lot) spaces (General Office)required per the proposed exclusion of floor areas. If a more intensive use (such as medical/dental) is placed within the facility the required parking will increase. (P&Z Action 08/06/98 Allow parking as shown) b. Each proposed lot/building requires a minimum of 81 parking spaces (General Office) within each lot boundary. Building A(Lot 3)proposes 83 spaces and has sufficient parking provided within the lot. Building B (Lot 2)proposes 64 spaces and Building C (Lot 1) proposes 79 spaces. If any one lot has less than the required parking reciprocal parking agreements can be executed between owners of the adjoining lots. (P&Z Action 08/06/98 Allow parking as shown) c. Loading spaces must be located at the side or rear of the buildings. (P&Z Action 08/06/98 Delete) 6. In the Site Data Summary Chart, list the total required parking as 249 spaces, 83 per lot. 7. Dimension the distance between the following buildings and the adjacent property lines: Building A north line and south line Building B east line Building C south line 8. Relocate the proposed dumpster for Building B outside the required 10'west bufferyard. 9. The following changes are needed with regard to compliance with previous plan approval: a. Delete the building setback lines shown along the east property lines adjacent to the Timarron Residential properties and City tract and along the west and south property lines. Building setbacks along these lines were approved on the previous Concept Plan as follows: 1. Building 'A' was approved with a 30' setback from the east property line and a 40' setback from the west property line. The applicant proposes a 20'± setback from the east and a 30'±setback from the west. (P&Z Action 08/06/98 Delete) 2. Building `B' was approved with a 35' setback from the west property line. The applicant proposes a 27'±setback. (P&Z Action 08/06/98 Delete) 3. Building `C' was approved with a 40' setback from the west property line. The applicant proposes a 20'±setback. (P&Z Action 08/06/98 Delete) b. Provide additional R.O.W. dedication for a 12' deceleration lane along F.M. 1709. Provide R.O.W. sufficient for 150' of lane length and 150' of transition stubbed to the adjacent property where the rest of the transition area will be dedicated upon the development of the adjacent tract. Adjust all setbacks as needed. �G - S • City of Southlake,Texas 10. A minimum 8'screening device(solid fence or dense plant material)is required along the west, C south and east boundary in accordance with the approved concept plan,adjacent to the Timarron residential properties and the designated Low Density Residential tract to the west. 11. Include the proposed street grading in the grading plans. This street must be constructed prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant should also coordinate grading and fill with the properties to the east in order to support the street profile of the proposed roadway. 12. Note the benchmark used for the topographical information. This should correspond to a City approved benchmark. 13. The following changes are needed with regard to utility plans and easements: a. The utility easement south of"Building A" crossing to the southwest property corner,as proposed,will severely impact the existing trees. The proximity of this easement to the existing tree cover will result in severe root disturbance,damage from machinery and damage due to soil compaction. This includes the easement shown crossing The City of Southlake tract. Staff suggests the applicant consider relocating this easement in coordination with the adjacent property owner(s). Contact the Public Works Department and the Landscape Administrator for further assistance. b. Include all off-site sewer being constructed with this project in the Water/Sewer Plan. Cc. Provide utility and drainage easements only as necessary to service the associated facilities. As shown,the applicant has unnecessarily incorporated the entirety of several drives as utility and drainage easements. d. Provide plans for both the proposed on-site and off-site drainage features. No storm sewer connections have been shown for the curb inlets. Show easements for such structures. Address how drainage is to be handled coming onto the northwest portion of the property. e. Show and label the adjacent easements within Lot 18,Timarron Addition Northwood Park Phase Two. f. The subdivision ordinance requires a 5'U.E. along the west and south property lines. Confirm the need for these easements with the franchise utilities. To preserve existing trees staff recommends removing these easements if not needed. 14. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.l.c. on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the building within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. (P&Z Action 08/06/98 Delete) C '7G -S City of Southlake,Texas * This review is based on the"0-1" Zoning District Regulations. CPlease note that the building floor area shown on the approved Concept Plan was 21,768 sf. for each building. This plan proposes 23,433 sf of floor area per building. * The general orientation and dimensions for the building line along the east boundary of Lots 2 and 3 is correct. However,the actual R.O.W. dedication for Parkwood Drive may be extended south of where it is shown on the site plan. Contact the Public Works Department to confirm the • specific dedication and adjust the building line as needed on the plat for this site. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. Denotes Informational Comment enc: Bufferyard Calculation Chart, Interior Landscape Summary Chart,Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: David C. Ford VIA MAIL: P.O. Box 1702 Roanoke,TX 76262 J.E. Levitt Engineers,Inc. VIA FAX: ABOVE Andres Associates VIA FAX: Attn: Gene Andres(214) 634-1814 L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98058SP2.WPD 3 76 - io ' City of Southiake,Texas Articulation Evaluation No.1 Case No.ZA 98-058 Date of Evaluation:06/12/98 vations for French Court Buildings A,B,&C 'ved:05/26/98 Front-facing: Wall ht. = 22 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 66 30 -55% Yes 66 30 -55% Yes Min.artic.offset 2 3 50% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Min.artic. length 4 11 175% Yes 4 10 150% Yes Rear-facing Wall ht.= 22 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 66 30 -55% Yes 66 30 -55% Yes Min.artic.offset 2 3 50% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Min.artic. length 4 3 -25% No 4 10 150% Yes Right-facing: Wall ht.= 22 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 66 22 -67% Yes 66 22 -67% Yes Min,artic.offset 3 2 -33% No 2 5 150% Yes Min.artic. length 6 20 233% Yes 4 12 200% Yes facing: Wall ht.= 22 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided : Delta Okay? Max.wall length 66 22 -67% Yes 66 22 -67% Yes Min.artic. offset 3 2 -33% No 2 5 150% Yes Min.artic. length 6 20 233% Yes 4 12 200% Yes City of Southlake,Texas cLot1 SUMMARY CHART-BUFFERYARDS Bufferyard Canopy Accent Shrubs Fence/Screening Location Length Width - Type Trees Trees Height&Material North- Required 253 20' - M 8 5 30 Provided* 253 20' -M 8 5 30 East Required 297 5' - A 3 6. 24 Provided* 297 5 - 'A 3 6 24 South- Required 251 5' - A 3 5 20 Provided* none - 3 5 20 West- Required 339 10' - Fl 10 20 27 Provided* 339 10' - Fl 11 22 29 *Note any credits used in calculations: a. b. c. Other Comments: 1. Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W.,shrubs obtaining a mature height of three feet(3')or greater must be planted at a maximum spacing of thirty inches(30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. 2. A minimum of 50%of all canopy trees planted on the site must be 2"in caliper and 50%must be 4"in caliper. This includes plantings in bufferyards as well as interior to the site. 3. The applicant has indicated in the bufferyard chart on the site plan exhibit that plantings will be placed within themedian and along the sides of the common drive in lieu of the required 5'bufferyard. SUMMARY CHART-INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Required or Landscape Area %of area in Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Ground Cover Provided (Sq.ft.) front or side (Sq.Ft.) Required* 5,858 75% 10 20 98 586 Provided ? ? ? ? ? ? *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Other Comments: 1. (id L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV198\98058BF1.WPD Revised June 13, 1997 City of Southiake,Texas C Lot 2 SUMMARY CHART-BUFFERYARDS Bufferyard Canopy Accent Shrubs Fence/Screening Location Length Width Type Trees Trees Height&Material North- Required 251 5' - A 3 5 20 Provided* none - 3 5 20 East- Required 221 5' - A 2 4 18 Provided* 221 5' - A 3 6 24 South- Required 251 5' - A 3 5 20 Provided* none - 3 5 20 West- Required 245 10' - Fl 7 15 20 Provided* 245 10' - F1 10 22 29 *Note any credits used in calculations: a. b. c. Li, Other Comments: 1. A minimum of 50%of all canopy trees planted on the site must be 2"in caliper and 50%must be 4"in caliper. This includes plantings in bufferyards as well as interior to the site. 2. The applicant has indicated in the bufferyard chart on the site plan exhibit that plantings will be placed within a median along the common drive. The single median shown appears insufficient to support the plantings listed. 3. The applicant has indicated in the bufferyard chart on the site plan exhibit that plantings will be placed within themedian and along the sides of the common drive in lieu of the required 5'bufferyard. SUMMARY CHART-INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Required or Landscape Area %of area in Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Ground Cover Provided (Sq.ft.) front or side (Sq.Ft.) Required* 5,858 75% 10 20 98 586 Provided ? ? ? ? ? ? *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Other Comments: 1. L\COMDEV\W P-FILES\REV\98\98058BF2.W PD Li, Revised June 13, 1997 City of South lake,Texas C Lot 3 SUMMARY CHART-BUFFERYARDS Bufferyard Canopy Accent Shrubs Fence/Screening Location Length Width - Type Trees Trees Height&Material North- Required 251 5' -A 3 5 20 Provided* none - 3 5 20 East- Required 256 5' - A 3 5 20 Provided* 256 5' - A 3 5 20 South- Required none - - - - Provided* none - - - - West- Required 266 10' - Fl 8 16 21 Provided* 266 10' - Fl 11 21 28 *Note any credits used in calculations: a. b. c. Other Comments: 1. A minimum of 50%of all canopy trees planted on the site must be 2"in caliper and 50%must be 4"in caliper. This includes plantings in bufferyards as well as interior to the site. 2. The applicant is providing plantings for an F1 type bufferyard along the east property line south of the building wall. No plantings are required in this area as per the approved concept plan for this site 3. The applicant has indicated in the bufferyard chart on the site plan exhibit that plantings will be placed within themedian and along the sides of the common drive in lieu of the required 5'bufferyard. SUMMARY CHART-INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Required or Landscape Area %of area in Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Ground Cover Provided (Sq.ft.) front or side (Sq.Ft.) Required* 5,858 75% 10 20 98 586 Provided ? ? ? ? ? ? *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Other Comments: 1. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98058BF3.WPD Revised June 13, 1997 C '7G — i 4 ' City of Southiake,Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT) Case No: ZA 98-058 Date of Review: 07 - 17- 98 Number of Pages: 1 PROJECT NAME: French Square Office Complex APPLICANT: PREPARED BY: French Square Office Complex J. E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 726 Commerce St., Suite 104 Southlake,TX 76092 Phone: Phone: (817)488-3313 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481-5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: * The 15' utility easement in the south portion of the property cuts through the critical root zones of the protected trees that are shown to be preserved. Although utility easements are exempt from the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A, it is recommended that when ever possible utilities be placed outside the critical root zone of any protected trees. 1. All area within public R.O.W.', public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, and the fire lanes,required parking areas and area within six feet(6') of the building foundation as shown on an approved Site Plan shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements specified in Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A. 2. The applicant has shown good faith in providing for and preserving as many protected trees as possible on the site. # Denotes formal comments * Denotes informal comments c ri& - IS t olesawe�.fit* � SVX9.L '9Nr'[H.LAOS �Z e ` eeo — v 'AmA ne .LHa IN": 'A\'O i - V�•••.�� ��iii �. c►ec o Ei i E� e lCL Mr, t'-� X3'id7YOJ :7JT330 S t> > 1+�t '1 8 • 3Hvot's HQ N3H.4 p0 i D I+ II -aaa+ •01-aTptDaaaeuoTo ia�,-,, ....... 11 I'3 d� •r,e� w .b10AT0� ',are- 1 i II fill .-I 1 1 7-1600 x,a)-- '� r t ■ co g 77- Ol —4'1 . •; 1 b-°=':. :;;: - ..I IEEE:E sir Q 11 iiill F ) ...,si —4' ri w "� If �'r _: tl•� — IIRyC11 lIIIII.IiII w,i_ 1 `�a r � �� II[Iii:11 k I'Is; L - _it, i 4 9 I ° .-C-C C-C p I' o +I CC:C•C:C Y LY , 1 1 l' :.. -- - Itmi � E:i.ifi... .i: el I di o Al i ! I T II t, . il 1,-II FydF�w 11�n I.. EO I, i ii s �- �I . -itccccPi0i° , II . - sae:CI . p ' ■ :. .a = , I 1. �' i"' 4 - . . _ r III I ` ELEI �� �� I{?, ��g g i � I ;ii I. �E:iY�ii1�,ic ti :r ...,,a.',.. i, 1 s 0EI C �' u -�iJ - i ° •■,�� �u I 111II,"II r u ) 11 4 giii d . .,- 1 • �, :1 I ti 1 I : ,i; ; Ill 1 A ,ram- T ;; ,1 ;MI 1 NV I. ....-- I \ '� F ;^I : �:� __. 1 \ . teir"ri, = f fr . il'i:::111111 ILO J11101111 \ } : i I; It ,1` ,, tit ice. C . I - \ , -,�\.�, `llfitiiy"ai::!:iligii: ti:Fi . ri Pi./ , IiM ¢f:!.°yiiiirMil•Fi itifiiiM _ . EtF 1 iiitFti :rjii4li lIr F::ii. '4 'i `' f eFf • . ' 4)1,' " tih i •3^: : .. it a $.. °':i:t :!i !i:o-_ :.. , il 11 i Si " s 'i..?ti . :it. i,! f.{•'!:;it pri: i it s I il::1 le' - ---- - -- 'AL-•er--> __�'ril�`ti—fi • ; ►1s---...- --I �°1 \ I "�• 1 aa,I I 11 C ` to t f P.�.�.:..�..es I • I p I I I I� \ 1 1 I I 1 I I I I 7G_ 16 .-..;...., — ....r...-.,. EDQ& 1`i'1'0 "Y � Vi VetU°H uo11■C>in se CO P$11,°4"e E xaldu '� �! O � 4�ua.y l Li 1 ... a i ) ,a 1 _ -._13... II,:,...._ ._I Elmo (mommom ..■ '1..■ Tj: j1ai ' O .■. --. ,..■ W (mom C L -'I - m.■ �II- -1.....Elam-■- ..■ 'man Elm■ ..■ - ■.■ Ism■ I ..■ �..■ • :1 73 is 4 Elm■ ..■ Elm■ ..■ l I ..■. tom- I -- -I Imo 'ogee - Ii MI .. • : .......•-•-• : .......•-•-• .. /m.. ■ / /... !C-T■ ... ' ■ •_I I (..■ (... ::: ::: _ Cua1 \mom .......wag ■ 0 (...I (: _ (::: (::: : •.. (::: _-_ +.1 MINN ..■ al 0... c - C W 0 w` • W,s.-,-,,_.., 3ir > I.i::: :: > 'II..7.'7:f.::- ISMI• ANNE ICI) . Il .0 �..■ W k .0 I,u■ L. _ ■.■ (..■ w,.a+a■a■a (L +.■a.•a•+raa Ct • 1 i l C • 7G-t 1 I ...,r/*MOM - ~Mr" UM XL NmPumel1 VOA 106'o'J 'IMAM wolor0 I1 WWI r • 1 i toef44/14,2701Xa dWO3 v911Q 0 yoU0-� 1 Q co rn a iii c, JiI1r- � it' 11111I1 cr uuuing . IIlI III11 0• gill � I-■� 8 i ii i U U U' ® ; -- — — ad ,ia — a I. a IU ' - F J J i', Cli huh " T .I Mt. 11111 LB SO C' I ;.ii. ,, --1 1Iio �tol 9 1 :�� Ilt to O [•1[•7 it4111� �I IIIItCalll : �I■' L:t.: ,11. 1 IL ! II a. 11 I li [ al lt rl i_ J L1 .,11r t .1.4___ .1 :1 . o; — C 7G - Is J zaZ L IL.i401110061 voii'itott as i warn*s.i we N li, ixagdwa° Go!g4o'J 4ouead k Q A wf/13'4104,± 3 co 0) J 3 `J� �c.' - -- - _J! 1 _ t , _; .;__.i ClMiulrn t i,.„ L I , t � � � 1-- _ � ' 0 m o : - - � , � LL -1 0 1 0 t Ci 0 a O L —� _ - — 3 a 11 : ,M.NV;i 1 CO .� C ai ► a • �L AMA .,, it , Ana ....t.f Ix ' , � o o — ,�, [ t ; t _II4 • '7/IiITI0 i 4 •l ►�� i'.' O 1 a,C_'.: eoriu:t II k ; k III l• t— V V _I o 0 al t I o _ _ III . 1-1 I s I . c 1G-- I9 -.0)....*\ •i ate +S; 'lgtKri Iv = 1 142,1J ii •CO ill C bib1 j ; ! ! ! ; : ; ! ! $ i! f� i GOA•*0 0*00 00* VIII il:11 1 y...c4 QD 011111 $ 4" I , --- .-, ' '----^---- ' - - - z ' . 0 k 1-1 /Z.: f i ii 0 • • a • • • •• a P1!, i; /1: W 1 s ' A 9 R wL A �' jr., t.. I 1 .9 ),, i,:c j) 1, 1. 11' 11 del* 0 0000 Fri' �� 0 O0 0 il'1' ; h eei . 4 1 11 I r • HLLI:�:. cii-pil..."-- e if n --;,, 11111111I ' (4) F�_, 1 !,:i __. 1 r1 , 1 N! 0 1 ,:....1.) v,i. f.„,4 - ill ;I � rl1 i C 1 • LI'11 ( A I 9 - Tel,,,,�„TM1 --- -- I.:A t I i PIG •ao wM+..r. .0•..or ding + LIZ ::911 ,l..i...lo:.�..� X21d xn' ,IMV'V W I Kmui i1 —1 _ 1-tdid —IO N—d OD WI - r — QtrsO° r- tiiii I °D C) r !I. !i ' r c� o041 , =IP ..e‘c wall:phi' , :*; i �'flil:is L1 1 I 1 I CCiclooliwoo sliitillt li �Ii iii�l i ' ' ,\ /' 1 • I i l �. � - ■ .,APB. 5 I \ %( -\ I ok tl..,li i .�� "a.f , I , ° �s - 04 ()ill o r� 1:11' ( I , a .4,vie, _____t g q \J — I ~ / l'• • Ks.if �k ( 41f t 4 tare, , , ..T. ...�..•, • k I 1 s° fig \ I / E'i/� 1 1 •, s 1141 I 1 /^\ it\ �f i ��- \ �` f J ta. I I ! \�,.,`�, •-:S ) of VI\y---\ / �- k - 1 ti i \I \ \ i./ ( ..i\`A ..s 1.1 �\ --'\ �- 1. / -Mt 1.3 ) 1 '1.1 I / 1 3 fi/4 -,.f 1 ( -Pt J\ Z i ...f ..s ,,t'CL, I f C li . ''' A / ( •,•t ) / Y -Q 7-`t ui Ii1 .111, ■ .l1 F 11 g11111il .1111E _ _ _-. ___ __ - �- _._ _ _ _ _ 1.__- I.11/■Itll - -Till FIII■ 1 - I 1 ■■.Ilh'■■ I 1 .. •1. ■■ �Ilttll t ■ 1■ 1■■/11�■ ■■■■■■ rl ■ t / 11 .111 1■1 ul. 1 11t I n11 ■IIII •IIII IIII i� I 1 III IIII ■ I,■�.•• .�r�• II- r 1 II II■ III 1/1 1 ■1 ■ _ •11■I ■11■'ll Fllt .Il II FI �■ slit -I \ . n 1 •.■1..11■..I _ I 11 I III.. r ll 111■IIII ■�111 11.111■ ./■ . IIII■ .1/•Ill ■ I I I I ■'• I ■IIII ■ 1 In. Fuululnll II Anln, • I' ...Bill. . - - IIII■Iln ll,iI. n11■IIIII 1 I ■III• 11 111gI IIII I I 11 11 . 11 al's 11l IIII I I null l■11 II �/■11/t 1. .IIII■I lb 1■ ■•.■IIII bIIII .Ill■IIII■IIII \'III 111■. .. .. 1 i� 11171•In■unn.•ilili IIIIIilii tllli nm.gi inii iliiii Ili IIII"IIII ■IIIn 111 I, •Iln■IIIll �� JI■111 •dlunlY III■III ■■ ■UI■11•IIII g1111111■' �■ 1 PIT.•:.• ■nn••.Il■a 111111 01111aBills .111111111■1•. FIIII :n•IH I1ilutllttl.'■I, .nr,un un� .■sir II I t11N.' IIt11il1•b. IIIII■IIII■I's■V •.■Iu11111111■IIII■Pn■II'. (IIII/IIII■lil Ill■IIII■t11 JIII■IIII CIIIb1 .Fbl■1 1LIIIt. /FIII1111■IIII 111 ■:111 I:10 •: Illlltt 111 1UtgnIu1111 I 1 1 1 I I IIII ■,II. ■. 1 II ■t11 I I I I .Ill■1/gl ■ I I I nil■1 11 II 11 I I I 111 .'Illgl lg 1 I I I '../.■IlFlllrllg III ■■IIIIgl11 ■I /1l Iglu ■■ _ I 'uu 1 lave unl ■■ ulu ■■ �I II ■■lil Iu1■ug•u nil■ non•. ■■ .■m 1 1■ n u 1 - Ilu a I1 L • 111 II 1 II 11 l u l I II 1 ■ •`••'I 1 III IIII a I I 1 • - I I IIII F. 1 I I • I I 1 • 1 1/■ II 1 Iltl 1 1 111 I I I . g l g I a. . Ill I I / 1 ■ \II Ilg. 1 I 1 1/■11 II 1 IP. 11■1 • 1 Ilgll■ I 11 1■ 11■111 ■ II ■1. ulu m n n I 11 In mil• 11• 11 m 1 n111 oils •■ l i ■ 1 n nlr.0 n u 1 1 1 I l ■ I I 1■ I 11■• • ■■ ■ I I 11 ■ 1 g -- I 1 ■■ 11 1■ 111111 I I I I I I '1 I I III, Iln I n 1 1 '1. 1 1 I 1. ■ I u l I g l u 1 1 U t l g ■ ■ I IIII■11■1/• ■■ II 9 IIII■1 ■■ I 11 • Is■11•I �i•.wuuFununun■■ unnn unnnnu,.•nulunnnt /• un.il1F' nnu/n1nt,, InnulFlnF__Innniluln n ■■ nFunnn•Puoull - ■. . ■nil nub es, 1:11/ gills oturnu/' oI F 'l lit lul • unlul ■■ uunn nln sin ■■ ilunnn .lnnn ■nu nuu _- au.ln • �n In gulnnu g •bun In uw: al. Ur.1Inlllugll. uu uuu IIIInIl1I.'lln'e11■oll.'111 i111 Will �� IIII FIII gmI■Ill ■■ ■■ 1Unep 1I t 51.19 a. •• ■.11 tn.. •..u:IL. 61 ,its,Iml llnnn� PRO Pi I�lut•�u•n11�IU1Filun1. ■ ■ unnnn u��rn■mm!P-gunuraiu■nu■num1.1., .--unnml ■-----. .. ■ �� �� ■ ■ro ■I ■ ,■■IS I i■■' ■ ■■j ■ j■■ ■■I �■■; ■■ ■ •■■ ■■ ■■' ■ :■■ i■■ ■ ■■ ■■ :■■; ■ i■■; ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■■; ■■. ■■ ■■! ■ ■■' ■ ■■� ■■! •■■! ■ i■■ i■■•; I■■' ■■ I■■ :■■ :■■i I■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ i■■. ■ I■■i I■■: !■■ I■■■■ '■■ ■■i ;■■; i i ■■ ■ Q ■ ■ ■ ■ Q ■ ■ ■ ■ Q ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ So ■ ■ ■ ■ IN IN ■ ■_�■ ■ ■ /■i an ■ ■■ n ■ I91-Q In ■■i ■ ;■■ /■� i■■I /■ ■ !■■ !■■ I■■i ■ ■■ u ■ ■■ ■■i !/■! ■ j/■; !/■ !■■ '■■ ■■■I ■ n o I is 0 ■■■' ■�■ ME as an • Fleva •-s - .II ■III. 1■■■� 11.E■■■■■■■.O ■IIII ■Illt ■'■■■■■■■IIIII �■■1 mmm�. ■'11,--.--- .Purn�•1un_._..__.___.__ .......■.nuu■nn..........o .d■IIn1111.........• • . ..1 Plli�'.II�!11_-1in�ilq iiliii',I tell •III11un11■IPI F1t 'Iii-Iq■ '• • .Iilnlln Fln•o• P11n 1n 111. _ _ .Ir ,•II• Ol b/lt'�:■bill Flq ■IUI d111■'1 /■ Itlul. 1u11,11nng1'e .gib In Inn ■. .. . �'l.. , ■l1 uqO■In g11/Fun qi� Ilil17 111 at1•'•1m11 �nli�lli i:��• -•r I ■In III �ilil kiln. .• •. 111 mii-!ailuglr ■ s II t I1 .I 11111111t■n Jllluliln'N �iP/�ilO �Illr loll �u��-,;, �iij �jilr Jl'1'�y, Fil l■ill tit'. Fln /-III r•UI■I^n110■Ill mus ■L \�. •IIMIIi\ail/1 t1 tI1 u • .• . • •'•s1u6.. • • ■IIII,. .Is■11,1■11.6 IIII g111I.11s.11r 1■In 1■1 /. 1 1 I1- deli I1/ Ful. ai intialiai�ui�i. iEllis alll aIli• III/■IUI ■.IIU• ■. I ■■ Iln/IIII 911n11119,1118 ■� tl.I' ill 81..■ Ill gmIIII/IIII■I. In mllu'In■I II11�•'.11111U gills As IIIII■■■ Illbll. ■Iles ■Ills■1. 11. . t•./�on at• 1/1 ,, tllu nFUI 11 .tn Nall Fl l■IIII■■ Ilull,l■III ■It1 L'1/.■IIII seen/IIII ■Illullunn-slllulln■IP •■III F11■Ill 1m1Ful$all 11/■Ilg ■■ ■nu.■.lu Flln•rl.■IIII gI111r�n�n ■■ IIII 5:11. Bills milli ■10. 1'.. '1 I I 1111,111,.`■1nn■i11 ■IIII 11//1111 ■111nut IIII 1luulpull ■■ P■i1111p1■P •IIII FII g�1111n:lutlluunn ■■ sin unnn ■n.•171nluuh �� LFIInIul Fllnl �■ .Ir d1 ■I Ill milli r.il111111 still nl■• li ; ■� IIJ:111 tl1n �i llllunlu 111■ ■■ Il ■Ion IIII ---- ''Ill ■111/1 ill ■■ U111 t111/111t 111. ■III■111■ ILg In ■IIII b1u1■ nu111111 ■I fill milli li ills velum ■■ /I/I/1111. FI.1u•.ul..a. ■I'JIIItFIn•p,lpun■■ ■oil,■n lmlt111111L Uluuill■IIII lUrFuull•n Olt■d'1• II Il ill■ills-'Intlllllpl.• •r7111 gI11un-1n11■IIIL1.111 ■1il. 111I111n■■ 1111111 unnn■■;IIm11/11 ill■IIIImlls lunn!1 culnFu. FUCFunnn •:u, ... ,... IlllnlulllFun ltn'uu1■■nFln■q.■nnF111:1,1.•1q11F1.aJa■■1■11.1 T1.Fusin■■■111181V glut■■ 1 _.I... .. ,tltl//IIII■■1111ngn1.gnm11 IS el, •Ig1111111nn1 •••.•.••-••.•. .• 1nu1'urmn:lu. . r-.11mI1Flu.Fr.■illu-n. -uuuu F•. ■ItIl11IIW11. tnln1lu ■■ ntnn bnllTl/■ ■■ 1:1111/sill .. .... ■ ■ ... .. .. III FuI gU-•JIt1U111111111.b•r-■.1 •:ID .�its■IIWbills ln. .. ■dl bll:.•:.6..: u:: 6• .IU'.gd11 ■IIII IIII/■I. .. .... to bills ■111111u. ■IIIn1111 _IOtI11uIIll bm/u.•.uuu■ ■ ■ �` ■ ■1.. .... I..........j....... 1I: ... ■.. I i�-Rills ■...;■■` .. .. /� /\ /� /\ ■■■I i■■I■■■■■■.■■/■■i■■■;■■i■ ■ ■■■ ■■' '■■! ■■ ■■ ■ ■■I Nil, ■■i■■; ■■■■■■ ■■ ■■I ■■ ■■ ■ ■■) i■■■ ;■■ ■ ■�i ■■ ■■l ■■ - ■- ■ - ■ - - ■ ■ ■ - ■■ M ids ■ ■ ■■: ■ ■_■ ■■; ■ ■■ II■ ■ ■■ ;■■I I■■! ■■ ■ ■■ ■■i ■_ ■ i'i i■■ ; All 0 ids■■I- ■ ■i ■ ■! Samoa b. • ais .IIIII'. i'iliiiili ................................... ............Yp....p.■■. 11�11 �111 /IIII ^•IIU JI Fill■Pr■qt.■IIIU■..IUgn■pIL■'P/:■u uulu:uili1•8■nn■n:C. lit. ■IUI Fun PI...•I1111n 1'■'lid �'�: 1 ;. •'-/IIII g111rI.Ir1-m11ml 1111F11/■nlnm..IllRole mllt:■:.1■111•nll:1n11.■mI1111l bill/m. 1FI11111. eIt■III■'.Ig tl:11;■-Illmllnllll'.bn11111111F t111/■IIII■IIII ■n.•:b1111t1111■Ill/:■`111111.1 , 1.■'1.• gills si TI.I+"Ilan Y. m11111t11 bn11F11 Ili ■IIII:■lll'..111 blln'gtln11111/ ■ll. • Inn mils 111n F1.1■:111 gl Il tlil. -IIIII ■I/ •,". + i T .•11 •�;^0.I ■IIII •.111 8,111 bll �t b�111:1�1t1 b1111 /IIII.• �11111� ■ rm!o �111■11 �1 tali . Via milli 1� 11' �I't t�lll'mil• 1 I,1 till\ `Illl.b i �■■■■ �■■i■nr..u. .i.m■1uw■u■I nn...■u. milli ■■..n.m.i.n.m.n.a.nm...n,■.a`.u11.r11.u.1w.1.111.1n:b.e■rgn.•l:rn.ilm.n■lsiwi1llul.lu■u'.nlllil'moilel■nnumulmw:Fun■unubnn.'uwunun■Iulynanububnlln:tFumiluI1utro.nilsil:r uW.,•m■Fuunln■ .il�.■I': ■■■ iON ■■I ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ !■■; !■■ ■ ■ !■■ ■■ •iii■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■iii.�ui /■ 'NEI ■■ ■ ■ ■■ /■ ■ ■: ■ `■■ ■■ ■ F1 ■ I■■I ■■ ■ ■>�■ s n■ 1 ., , ugl I g 1. 'JIIII Bill /�■ Ilp •FIT. lion nlu• ,Ig 1u1.•unl 1ur.numu. n■n unn11 uug:a ::. . im-•.unlpl .,' •n -V■1b1 .........■....:iini�iii��i �duii�:iiin..■....■....r...■.1 u..u.■,.' f•:l1nu1,■1'1110111■1F1FF1it■.I/6 1 I1u. • z'.1 .7alnlllr•oD■uF■II11/t1il■■n 11111 ■'.IlIIIII■■nlnlq tqO.■.sit■u■u. Ill/ 1111'/ 11.1111sills 11nlllulln■.11r.gllnillnllls oil. .2gills Itll■1111■ gills IIII1:111. �-•'C ./ „�.■■/ 11.i:�`i■ ..'�• _rIsgI.I1'11.1■1.1uI.11'm.I■■I11n •u1 ■u1 tII.III111I1 ■1■■II•-1�I1:■1■1I1n •still ll.n■.\II.lIlIIlIIl■.!•n■(Il.Ig.I.Isills '•.".r■..ItloIl ./n.•■o.te,1..■.ps.ml. oylt'.■.l:.I■..n grl.t .;■1.'I�II1l■■./@p.IIsi r■■..11.11\'■.1Bill I,tills .u..,n.•1..0...11.11 ItIll■Ill/■III.\1111■II■g1l■1Il,l ■s111111. 1 gIly.■ .1'1■'. IrII111■II1I -. IIII ■,0111 ■IIII ■, F1111■ sells IIII■IM1:11111■ IIII.II .•.F11/seeIIp111g nu..■I..wmw:ln.■m.sills ■uuJistlm1Ugnt111n:In 1n1/ 1nli,IBig:lgtl1minlun1 Ellie ■�■■ ■ I ■... ■■ .... I.......:.... �.. amNMI so i■■I ■ ■too, ■■■■ I■■I nunilili■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■sill s ,■ ■ /■ II■ gains ■ ■■ I/■I ■ ■ ■: 1 Floor Plan First Floor Scale 1 /8" = 1'— 0" 9.342 Nur L.EASEABLE 90. FT. ff C,D b 1998 Sod projod = $ 0 0 +r a. 0 U= U C Dotc Am$.. Project No. Sheet No. A-1 L Floor Plan Second Floor Scale 1 f8" = 1'-0" 9r595 NET LEASEABLE- SO FT. REC'D MAY 2 61998 Sad ProjKt �6 Project No. Sheet No. A-2 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT August 14, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-083 PROJECT: Plat Showing/Lots 12. 13. and 14. O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Showing of Lots 12, 13,and 14, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition on property legally described as Tract 5E situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being approximately 6.1441 acres. LOCATION: South side of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) approximately 1,100' west of Byron Nelson Parkway. OWNER/APPLICANT: 1709 Joint Venture Partners CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2"Generalized Site Plan District with"0-1"Office District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: August 6, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 31, 1998. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 31, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-083PS.WPD BAr( ; I 1 t, ukra-- ;5CMCCI-7 114 t ; ; eels ok, w4"• vi 0 0 1 i - 'IIMINE IIIIIPI!.1111111-Ai I MIEN ! I 1 i I il i ______e Wiiii 11C*4 wi 1 a ligunso .1 inn: 401104 , , . / 1 !,-- ,c),yot-L \ 1 I ! I I I I TN() 446...7 ‘'N'S>., : • "----104E--1-7-11 _Aril . '15)- -11-1, • -----'; 1v"''`;' ,3s-f-: ---.--1- L----------: i ' 1 ; 1 ' ; 1 ' 7-9,10-14 - ---7/1 ' EST Nit 1 Fi,I 1 / ' r r 11-11-01 i 1 •-no.--,7 ..:-.-„, : ,-,. 1 ,c, , i ; • , ,/ , ./ . , -. • s ' ciolk - I .:i . ,....,Ni. .s \ , -, .( 6.10E57 t••?' / r-\ M I I I ' \\\,,.... ---1,, --- -%: I i I _ I r--- i . 1 i •--- ; ; . ,---, ' ----71 i 1 1 / , i , i_ i\ 1 --1-11 Ec ---.----i ' I ' ' ' L,...-- 7---'71 . 1 . ____.;, • ,__, , It:si,. .. ' ilk ,T4mirrammina.‘" 1 'T7 061 , / -•-• .: i , ,,cfg,*- : 1 / I 1 • 1 ?Os ' ! 1 1 !„ I ' i r , 1 R./ '• - 1 ----, ' ; /1 /) ;/ 1 ' / 1 ,1 1 , P --- _____ , , 1 1 . , /' p,Rsf _.___________ ----- -- u; ---T- • O''. ' -i ..! i ,..„ ,.- , a , ; 1---- ,i/ -_„..c•Nr "7 r /!bs\Jellcl.".----t: 010 ----\--•—• --, <;• // • ,7 ; ,,,2 11"i/ ,, • j I 7---7 ! Ifs / 1 I 1 i r , .---, - ,'• I i / 1 PaCe3 I [ 111 ! 111 1 '1 / 1 1 ME 1 IHROMparl 7 1 /. ! I( • L greigio 1 1 0.111- \ gil 1 7------r _JAA146.- - 1 "Fti lirrai m as11---- \ I , 11*/*4111111116_ . .-- ,. 1 = fkkt\ \ tt I_L_____I . , ,,fl_H rial i , ; 1 1 ; 1 • .,1____A VI. t w 1_ 1 L! 1_,- • ‘ I 1 ' • ta 1 I , ii k-.- ,, , iH7 _ ,---1 , H I 1,___ii — CT --. , i I i \... ; T I apTi N j j . , 1,. 1 J__ TRACT MAP ' • , ,..-- -. ..E.: , „0 ......-- -..1.,;i: 9 4- 't...0,-,,a I 1----\-- -TT- \ , A I t,a 8 7 - TR 3 W. HALL 10A 11A a a t3A 4.47 AC SURVEY A-687 - - - - - 1 SF-1A 1 IA 2A 108 khl8 128 J.M. STEV NSON t .409 AC r 1 B F 2= 0 /1 I B fit► TR ,n .ili ‘11,e' STATE OF TEXAS) L_STATE OF TEXAS "AG" TR 501 TR 502 2.365 AC 1.698 AC i WESTERRA TIMARRON >n "AG" - „CS„ , (., , TR 5F • .... �._-•---N.. -4 501B TR 5023 10.0 AC TR5063.948 0 2.78 5.351 0 TR 1.658D3 AC CITY OF SOUTHLAKE S. GARRETT I • • tx a at, -- tw WESTERRA — b, TIMAR RON �_ A WOOD DR " a ,,, 24 Y U R X p 32 33 34 . '' 1 :I ' ' Q 4+ "AG" t 25 i O �1 m" " -R 2A2 WESTERRATIMARRON . 1.19 AC iy -' aa R NN • .d 4, B. SMALL TR 2A5 a 26 : d MI ` 2.398 AC TR 2A3 9 3 2s15 .5 rR 2A18 "R—PUD" 4 247 it :� ? 13 ^ v w h^ • ,.� = 14 It +b ? TR 2A3C all i 10 2 VIIII it p$' (iv 1.93 AC CLAYTON CT '� � ,y H g m A ;D 29 6 ���_ R 11 2 R 2 ��03 . V� 12 ,30 AO 1 -" I' ' I ' rf' 4 . ' =• •�o� 5 N " " a R 10 : 1 .r n 14 12 x : 2 - - 11 1° E• 8g 1 c �- . = o n ^ADJACENT OWNERS : .�) ( � " �'b.^ a Il�n �nNi�r 72 '4 20 City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY ase No: ZA 98-083 Review No: One Date of Review: 07/31/98 Project Name: Plat Showing. Lots 12. 13. & 14. O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition,being 6.1441 acres out of the O.W. Knight Survey. Abstract No. 899 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: 1709 Joint Venture Partners Randy Gregory Surveying P.O. Box 1702 7700 Precinct Line Road Southlake, TX 76092 Fort Worth. TX 76180 Phone: (817) 491-0335 Phone: (817) 656-0610 Fax: (817) 430-3620 Attn: David Ford Fax: (817) 577-9436 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/13/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 880. 1. Place the City case number "ZA 98-083" in the lower right-hand corner of the plat. 2. Revise the vicinity/location map to remove the shading between F.M. 1709 and S.H. 114. In accordance with standard nomenclature,rename the title of the plat to "Lots 12, 13, & 14, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition". Reflect this change on the graphic, in the legal description and in the dedication statement. 4. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description: a. Provide the deed record(Vol. &Pg.) for the current owner(s) in the preamble. b. The POB must be tied to a survey corner, or previously filed subdivision corner. c. In the second call from the beginning, remove the reference to the "Buttercup Lane Joint Venture" tract and replace with the Timarron Addition Northwood Park Phase Two information. As currently described,the adjacent property would appear to be unplatted. 5. The following changes are needed in the owner's dedication and notary: a. Change the word "streets" to "rights-of-way". b. Revise the owner's dedication and notary to conform with the standard format as shown in Appendix 2 (Corporations, partnerships, etc.). c. Add the words "My Commission Expires " below the notary statement. A:\98083PS1.WPD Page 1 SA City of Southlake,Texas 6. Add a lienholder statement and signature block with notary to the plat. If there is/are no lienholder(s) then add a statement to this effect. The standard language for these statements is attached. 7. The following changes are needed with regard to the graphic: a. Label Parkwood Drive and Northwood Trail. b. Show and label all survey lines. c. Remove the "Block 1" designation. d. Label Southlake Blvd. as "E. Southlake Blvd." 8. Confirm that any existing structures are adequately off-set per zoning district setback regulations from the proposed lot lines. Provide a separate survey or dimensioned exhibit showing the location of any such structures or note that all such structures are to be removed. 9. Add the following notes to the face of the plat: a. Selling a portion of any lot within this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of state law and city ordinance and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits. b. The City of Southlake reserves the right to require minimum finish floor elevations on any lot contained within this addition. The minimum elevations shown are based on the most current information available at the time the plat is filed and may be subject to change. Additional lots, other than those shown, may also be subject to minimum finish floor criteria. c. The owners of all corner lots shall maintain sight triangles in accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. 10. The following changes are needed with regard to easements: a. Provide easements for water,sewer and/or drainage in compliance with approved construction plans. b. Extend the Common Access Easement along both common lot lines to the west property boundary. Increase the width of the C.A.E. by a total of two feet so that it extends 1 foot beyond the drive width on both sides of common drives. Tie down the easement with dimensional and bearing information. Label all curve radii, provide dimensional ties to lot corners and ensure the C.A.E. is in conformance with the approved Site Plan. (No. 483-3.07- E) c. Provide utility and drainage easements only as necessary to service the associated facilities. As shown,the applicant has unnecessarily incorporated the entirety of several drives as utility and drainage easements. Provide drainage easements over the common drive lanes extending from the east to the west property lines. A:\98083PS1.WPD Page 2 64 �S City of Southiake,Texas d. Delete "Emergency Access Easement" from the plat. No easement is required for fire lanes. e. Provide dimensional ties along lot lines to all easements. Provide centerline dimensions and bearings on any easements crossing areas if deflections occur. Specifically address the utility easements within Lot 3. f. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 5' U.E. along the west and south property lines. Confirm with the franchise utility providers. g. Identify the diagonal area crossing the "City of Southiake Municipal Complex" Block Two, Lot 1 as "Future 25' Utility Easement". h. Show and label the adjacent easements within "Timarron Addition Northwood Park Phase Two". i. Redraw the 15' U.E. crossing Lot 3 diagonally so that it is to scale. 11. The following changes are needed regarding the proposed lotting: a. Correct the building line along the east boundary of Lots 2 and 3. The R.O.W. for Parkwood Drive will be extended to meet the southernmost point of the common drive between Lots 2 and 3. Show the 30' building setback line extending north and parallel to the property lines from this point of the common drive. South of the common drive the setback should be shown at 30'radial. See the attached exhibit for clarification. b. The common lot lines between Lots 1, 2, & 3 require bearings to be labeled. c. Dimension all property corners to the centerline of the apparent existing R.O.W. 12. Provide additional R.O.W. dedication for a 12' deceleration lane along F.M. 1709. Provide R.O.W. sufficient for 150' of lane length and 150'of transition stubbed to the adjacent property where the rest of the transition area will be dedicated upon the development of the adjacent tract. Adjust all setbacks as needed. 13. A"Certificate of Taxes Paid"from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County records. 14. Revised preliminary water, and sewer plans are required with the submittal of this plat. Provide drainage plans that incorporate both on-site and off-site features necessary for the development of this property. Specifically address drainage coming onto the northwest portion of the property. * The final plat for the"City of Southiake Municipal Complex"must be filed to establish R.O.W.access and the proposed street(Parkwood Drive)must be constructed prior to the issuance of any building permits on any of the proposed lots. The applicant should coordinate grading and fill with the properties to the east in order to support the street profile of the proposed roadway. A:\98083PS1.WPD Page 3 SA -l� City of Southlake,Texas * Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original signatures. * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * A Developer's Agreement is required prior to any construction. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements, off-site sewer extensions, and off-site drainage and utility easements. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 08/10/98. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Denotes Informational Comment enc: Setback Exhibit Standard Lienholder Statement 'c: 1709 Joint Venture Partners VIA FAX ABOVE Randy Gregory Surveying VIA FAX ABOVE A:\98083PS1.MPD Page 4 EA-1 L I . I 1 • • avanamr • • 41111MrS Mr ummimA mi fir • 411111011111 • -INIMIIIIIINO) ini inimemnr ma imensuni ims awimminim c • • . AccE • • -plI11 -- — — Jelg41 .\\ �T II ` - - LaT ) . . ,. . • • •• M • 30 8 L' - - c .....„_.......+ _f .... 1 4 I . tilb . .. 10` USity 1( 1 1 1 , . - ♦ 00. 0 R . a . w. . ..? . . -. r .mo,i. .... ..m. .ter (11.1 a,. .41100. 4ffil.•• ._.: ! or I1I1J hIJI iftjij 11111 1101111 II'. I• 11Jt 'j , t lilt III1 "Li .1 `i{� j�:ii1 titlli� 'lids :E '''� I�i'.•Ill1g11 'Isl. 16111 •I1 is iill!I ; 11l;111iitsl' 11, I 1 1i, 2a rm Jll: Iii 1 POI. 1a 1 i i i t1I1 lb, 1 ,. iRl1 c g r r n 'E1 t jIi' .�1 + fir. E I e.IF 11 ��� sees re n to a.-- !t 11I !IL • 1 11{ i' ili 11 ,� jE t Esa:1; EII� 1�i/ la11I 1 ttllij 1t� 11i �`i!I jag'III t 111; 1':1.i Ail!' •11111 1it!1 t1 II ! 1• 1 11I 1 i I 1 il 1 {1 , ,,It I• tae��tt E . E IItiltil � �11 - 1 al ` it tI IUI!,1 11111111111111111 1 / 1:11 i.t:l1111)11 I ► tilt! I I1 �� —1 (Wenel^°8„31e14! pp� ^°S)60L l�te,N4844 elelS U 10 I 5 Q I I •w.e E: L r- 1!•: Q Voto i I U m 'En m 5 FN-rn A c ' !'!<1 a i H O .rxmgo .- li 13 1 IE b� D,� c o Cs, ,;-„, I I 1'1 'lz j mOQUH -�it� I 1 r IIa�! i ' :: ... bti, t ia, ci- U) N• C To r I I A. Ja l C O I II L c !i 11 �, m I 1 LL v 1• -aw - - tie!_i w 1,1 3 I I x „ • ij 4il i J iI - _._._•_•_._J i ! ..i. o' - % / i _.__ % ..___ ».w+...• w...... i_il1 u. : .+ "..1 Kit • . •• a z a rr n . O pl ,� SA A City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Stefanie E. Sarakaitis, Planner SUBJECT: PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE No. 704 The attached draft 8 of Sign Ordinance No. 704 reflects the recommendations of four work group meetings (composed of Mayor Stacy, Chairman Creighton and Pamela Muller), City Council discussion on June 16, 1998, legal reviews by City Attorneys Wayne K. Olson and Debra Drayovitch, Planning & Zoning Commission Work Sessions on July 27 and August 3, 1998, and Public Hearing on August 6, 1998. Staff involved with the draft are Community Development Director Greg Last, Plans Examiner Chuck Bloomberg, and myself. The proposed Sign Ordinance recommends sign prohibitions, new sign classifications, and modifications to various existing regulations. Per the Planning & Zoning Commission, an analysis of the method of measurement for monuments signs is being formulated and will be distributed at the City Council meeting on August 18, 1998. In addition, a few issues have been brought to staffs attention after the Planning & Zoning Public Hearing on August 6. These issues are noted within the draft in italic. Two (2) written responses have been received: • Bruce Roberts, Greater Fort Worth Builders Association, 6464 Brentwood Stair Rd, Ft. Worth, TX 76112, regarding a proposed 18 month phase-out period for subdivision marketing signs (see attached letter). • Bill Kemp, 400 Southridge Lakes Parkway, Southlake, TX 76092, proposing further modifications to the Sign Ordinance (see attached proposal). Each of the recommended changes is listed in the table below. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 481-5581, ext. 753. a�g. Agee6nc,.d,„ 1-inorogr e a.118 '.',b ang,; 1 s'111 , 2-4 1 Defmitions Defmitions modified: Gross surface area; Sign, banner; Sign, business; Sign, development; Sign, directory; Sign, ground; Sign, logo;Sign,special purpose;Sign,subdivision marketing Definitions added: Public Property; Sign, builder; Sign, bulletin board; Sign face; Sign, gasoline pricing; Sign, institutional; Sign, subdivision entry Defmitions deleted: Sign, construction; Sign, freestanding; Sign, tradesman C." 4 3 Sign permit required Language added for requirement of building permit prior to sign permit release. 5 5.B(new) Fees—annual renewal Provision added to provide for annual renewal fees to all applicable temporary signs c:\C1TYDOcs\ORDDRAF S1GNvo4\CCMEMot.DOc August 14, 1998 F Page 1 of 4 City of Southlake, Texas Iv. ;aea P $Z,t' e a • 5 6.0 Conditional sign permit: Per Building Official, language changed to reflect the current fee fees schedule adopted by Council. 5 6.D(new) Conditional sign permit: Provision added to provide for annual renewal fees to all applicable annual renewal fees temporary conditional signs 6 11.A Removal of obsolete signs Language added for removal of obsolete temporary and permanent signs. 7 11.0 Removal of signs on Language clarified for removal of signs on utility poles. utility poles 7 11.D Removal of signs in Language has been added for the removal of signs affixed to ground rights-of-way on public property. 7 11.E(new) Removal of illegally Language has been added for the removal of signs which are erected signs illegally erected,constructed or displayed 9 16.A.2 Attached signs: The minimum letter / logo height to be no less than 6 inches. minimum/maximum Maximum letter/ logo heights modified. Language has been added letter/logo height to provide for lease spaces which do not front on a street. 9 16.A.3 Attached signs: Provision changed to reflect 0.75 s.f. for every one foot of building maximum area or lease space width. 9 16.A.4 Attached signs: Provision modified to allow for one sign per lease space along each number of signs street frontage. Provisions added for secondary attached signs at public entrances on another side of building from primary sign placement; secondary sign not to exceed 25% size of the primary or permitted sign, whichever is more restrictive. No sign shall project above 18 feet from at-grade entrance. 9 16.A.5 Attached signs: Language added to include lease spaces whose facades are sign width horizontally articulated. 9 16.A.6 Attached signs: Requirement modified to limit vertical distance of sign to roof eave roof line limitation or overhang. Also, allow for signs on fascias when specific provisions,as outlined in text,are met. 10 16.A.7 Attached signs: Language added for illumination of attached signs only during illumination posted business hours; exterior letters with exposed neon lighting not allowed. 10 16.B.2 Monument signs: The minimum letter/logo height to be no less than 6 inches. (new) minimum letter/logo height 10 16.B.3 Monument signs: The maximum height is being reduced to four(4)feet;base height is maximum height being reduced to eighteen(18)inches. 10 16.B.4 Monument signs: Sign face is being reduced to fifty (50) square feet, not to exceed maximum area one-hundred(100)square feet total. 10 16.B.5 Monument signs: Language added to clarify that signs be located along each street number of signs frontage. 10 16.B.7 Monument signs: Language added for sign structure to be constructed or covered with material requirements the same masonry material as principal building, or stone, or brick. Sculpted aluminum face panels will be allowed. Text and graphic elements of sign limited to middle 75% of sign face, vertically and horizontally. 10 16.B.8 Monument signs: Illumination modified to include internal lighting for the sculpted illumination aluminum panels and ground lighting where light and source are not visible from public ROW. 10 16.0 Freestanding signs Prohibit freestanding signs. (Option A) (ispe. 12 16.C.3 Ground signs: Sign height is being reduced to three(3)feet. maximum height 12 16.C.4 Ground signs: Sign face area is being reduced to four(4)square feet, not to exceed maximum area eight(8)square feet total. L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFRSIGN\704\CCMEMOI.DOC August 14, 1998 813-2- Page 2 of 4 City of Southlake, Texas 12 16.C.5 Ground signs: Number of signs decreased to one(1)sign per site. number of signs 13 17.H Prohibited signs: Provision modified to include signs projecting on/over public right- projecting on/over public of-way and on public property. property 13 17.I Prohibited signs: Language added to prohibit signs projecting above an existing roof signs fascia. 13 17.J(new) Prohibited signs Signs on utility poles added. 13 19.B.2.d Menuboard signs Location limitation modified to provide for fifteen (15) foot separation between menuboard signs. 14 19.C.2.d Subdivision entry signs Provision added for allowance of entry signs on medians per Council approval. 14 19.D(new) Bulletin board signs Provisions added for bulletin boards. 14 19.F(new) Institutional signs Provisions added for institutional signs, which incorporate (Option A'-regulate) readerboards,due to frequent variance requests by institutional uses. 15 19.G(new) Gasoline pricing signs Due to frequent variance requests by gas stations, provision added for gasoline pricing signs, which display changeable prices per gallon. 15 19.H(new) Directional signs Provision classified as monument sign with various modifications reflecting ground sign regulations. 15 20.A (new Permanent signs exempt Section added for home occupation signs (as outlined in Zoning section) from permit: home Ordinance No.480,section 4.2). occupation signs 15 21.A Banners,pennants,and Pennants and streamers prohibited;banner area reduced to 0.5 sf per streamers one (1) foot building or lease space width; duration reduced to maximum fifteen (15) days, twice per year, with sixty (60) day separation for permits. 15 20.B(old) Balloons and other Provision stricken due to recommended prohibition. floating devices 16 21.B.2 Model home signs Ground sign modified to allow five (5) foot height; area reduced to thirty-two(32)feet per sign face 16 21.C.2.c Special purpose signs Placement time limited to twenty-one(21)days. 16 2.E(old) Search lights Provision stricken due to recommended prohibition. 16 20.F(old) Construction signs Provision stricken due to revision of development signs. 17 21.D.2 Development signs Height modified to five(5)feet; area modified to thirty-two(32)s.f. per sign face; duration modified to removal after one (1) year or upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on commercial or COs issues on seventy-five percent(75%)of lots for residential. 17 22.A Subdivision marketing Provision modified to reflect one(1) sign for every twenty(20)lots, signs not to exceed four (4) signs. Duration reflects from subdivision approval to one(1)year or until COs issued on seventy-five percent (75%)of lots. 17 22.B Builder signs Section changed from tradesman signs to builder signs 17 22.0 Real estate signs Ground sign modified to allow five (5) foot height; area reduced to thirty-two(32)feet per sign face;limited to one(1)per site. 17 22.D Window signs Area reduced to fifteen percent (15%) of window area, measured and located within ten (10) vertical feet from at-grade entrance to lease space. 18 22.E Garage/yard sale signs Limited to two (2) signs/sale, one (1) sign at subdivision entrance, one(1)sign internal to subdivision;limited to twice per year. _ Coe i 18 22(old) Off-site development Provision stricken due to modification to subdivision marketing signs signs. 18 23.1 Exempt signs: Language added for clarification to address vehicular signs; vehicular signs allowance of bumper stickers. L:\CITYDOCS\ORDIDRAFTSIGN\704\CCMEMOI.DOC August 14, 1998 8 3-3 Page 3 of 4 City of Southlake,Texas nas.i;Y 18 23.2 Exempt signs: Provision modified due to recommended regulation of directional directional signs sign as a ground sign. 18 23.3 Exempt signs: Provision modified to reflect signs be legally required or necessary government signs to the essential function of government agency. 18 23.7 Exempt signs: Provision modified to prohibit political signs on public property. political signs SES enc. Response letter, received 07/01/98 Response proposal, received 07/20/98 Draft# 7, Sign Ordinance No. 704 (ow, L:\CITYDOCS\ORDWRA}TSIGNM04\CCMEMOI.DOC August 14, 1998 —4 Page 4 of 4 07-01-1998 02�00PM 817 488 6796 P.01 • GREATER FORT WORTH eat%Valk Taos 76112.3212 BUILDERS ASSOCIATION 017-157-3004 Fat 017-457-2/170 ''motto et 7-4204Q2 My 1,1991 Hof Saltlike Aeration Greg Lists balsam of Cammunky Devdopment 667 Nods Quell A.em e Southlidtc,Tams 76092 . Dar tom: • Rcgerdi g yar proposed"Sign Ordinance":In&oehssions on this subject during the sad two watsplaos raided the Soutbiake City Council kr our associations desire to develop apbale adc procedm lc the builders thee Honest sigma.I sensed from she meal coding Hest li manta wade be (60, . 'expiable time tame to;base out and am endow our to work out in simile details with you. My Ides itty develop a stied phased out,One that would reduce the number of aigm plaannatt m we proceed through . Ilse li math phase-airs period actually federate for me.as I will be ea vacation with my GranddisIdnx),I will be out I the 22"�ly I. weld hope the council will continue to consider out proposal and wlll aifgw me mamy cruses to develop with yen the details of Ilse pvpoecil'phase oat" pin widt pu.. 407 4 .�, 0` Bruce Roberts • MEMBER: la :,: ta Nation&AocietJori of Home Binders-rows Aeeocidiun of 8r+i7dore,Inc. °° • RECD !U L 011998 RE-5 TOTAL P.01 L PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO SOUTHLAKE SIGN ORDINANCE Prepared by Bill Kemp July 18, 1998 While commercial development is important to Southlake, most residents desire that commercial development be compatible with the residential, open(and decreasingly semi- • • rural) environment that characterizes Southlake. Commercial signage should be strictly regulated in order to achieve that objective. I have visited Germantown,Tennessee, which has strict limitations on signs and which can serve as a model for Southlake. Many of my recommendations are based on the Germantown experience. Ms. Nancy Boatwright,the director of urban planning in Germantown, expressed the view that a top priority of a growing city like Southlake should be asserting strict controls over commercial signage. My comments are aimed at accomplishing that objective. I have many photographs of signage in Germantown which illustrate what we too can accomplish. ' Section 3. In order to finance the enforcement of the ordinance, an annual renewal fee should be required for each sign. The following sentence should be added to this section: All permanent signs, including. existing signs, shall require an annual renewal fee. Cse Section 11. What happens to a sign that is illegally erected? Can the city take it down? This section does not appear to address this specific situation. Section 14. Variances should be granted only in special circumstances. The reference to "practical difficulty" should be deleted. A variance in the number of signs should not be permitted. Section 16A(2). The letters in the Ebby Halliday sign have received many comments from residents. One of the issues is that they are too large. The maximum size of letters under the present ordinance can be as high as 60 inches. By way of contrast, the Westlake ordinance has a maximum height of 12 inches. The maximum heights in the chart should be reduced to one-third the present heights. Section 16A(3). The present ordinance allows much larger attached signs than Germantown, Tennessee or Westlake, Texas: Southlake lesser of 1.5 sq. ft. for every foot or 400 sq. ft. Germantown lesser of .5 sq. ft. for every foot or 50 sq. ft. Westlake lesser of .4 sq. ft. for every foot or 24 sq. ft. The Germantown size limitations allow for signs that adequately identify businesses. The Germantown limitations should be adopted (possibly with a maximum.of 100 sq. ft.). It would be useful in making this decision to know what the area of the present Home Depot sign is and what it would be if the letters were reduced from 5 ft. to 1 ft. 8 in. Page 1 813—s RFD 1. 1 L 2 01998 toallow a secondarysignis misguided. The purpose of Loe Section 16A(4). The proposal g signs should be to identify what business is at a particular location, not to provide free advertising to a commercial business. One sign is adequate to identify the location of the business. See the discussion below regarding the many signs that are permitted on one location under the proposed ordinance. Section 16A(5). The proposal to enlarge the sign width is misguided and should not be adopted. Section 16A(7). Illumination of signs with internal lighting is not in keeping with a residential environment. Illumination of attached signs should be allowed only in specified districts. These should include SH 114, within 1000 feet of the FM 1709 intersections at Carroll, Whites Chapel and Davis, and within the Villa•e Center. Interior illuminated signs should permit only translucent letters and not translucent background. Signs should be permitted to be illuminated only when the business is open for business. Section 16A. A provision regarding permissible sign content should be adopted. The Gremantown ordinance provides that commercial signs are restricted to the name of the business, the address, hours, instructions, and primary products and services. Logos shall not exceed ten percent of the allowable sign area, only one logo may be used on a sign, and any logo must appear as a secondary element of a sign. Section 16B(2). The proposed ordinance significantly reduces the size of monument signs but still allows larger monument signs than Germantown or Westlake: Southlake 50 sq. ft. per side Germantown lesser of .5 sq. ft. for every foot or 50 sq. ft. per side Westlake lesser of .4 sq. ft. for every foot or 24 sq. ft. (per side?) Many residents have commented that the Holt DentaVSouthlake Eye Care sign is too large. The measurements of this sign are 6.25 ft. high and 16 ft. wide, resulting in a sign that is 100 sq. ft. on each side. The proposed ordinance would reduce this area to 50 sq. ft. The Germantown ordinance would limit the sign to 47 sq. ft. The proposed 50 sq. ft. limitation should be adopted with the addition of the .5 sq. ft. for every foot of building frontage limitation. If freestanding signs are prohibited, it may be appropriate to permit larger monument signs on SH 114. It would be useful in making this determination to know the dimensions of the Las Colinas sign discussed at Section 16C below. Section 16B(4). The Home Depot has three monument signs. This building and the attached sign on it can clearly be seen from all nearby streets. There may be situations where a second monument sign is warranted, but a variance should be required to allow such an additional sign. The purpose of a sign should be to identify the location of a business or building, not to provide free advertising. A second sign should be allowed only pursuant to a variance from City Council. Page2 ea- 7 kee(kire ping 16B(7). Illumination of signs with internal lighting is not in with a residential environment. Illumination of monument signs also should be allowed only in specified districts. These should include SH 114, within 1000 feet of the Flvf 1709 intersections at Carroll, Whites Chapel and Davis, and within the Village Center. Interior illuminated signs should permit only translucent letters and not translucent background. Signs should be permitted to be illuminated only when the business is open for business. Section 16B. As noted with reference to attached signs, a provision regarding permissible sign content should be adopted for commercial monument signs. The Germantown ordinance provides that commercial signs are restricted to the name of the business,the address, hours, instructions, and primary products and services. Logos shall not exceed ten percent of the allowable sign area, only one logo may be used on a sign, and any logo must appear as a secondary element of a sign. Sections 16A and 16B. The maximum total signage for attached and monument signs potentially is 1100 sq. ft. [400+400+100+100+1001 A better approach is that of Germantown and Westlake whereby the combined signage is limited. Germantown limits attached and monument signs to a total of 100 sq. ft. ( where a double sided monument sign is used). Westlake limits attached and monument signs to a total of 24 sq. ft. A maximum total signage limitation should be included which limits total signage to 200 sq. (kr ft. Section 16C. Monument signs are adequate even along freeways, as evidenced by the monument sign in Las Colinas at SH 114 and O'Conner for three restaurants. Suggest that alternative 'A' be adopted. By way of comparison, Germantown allows freestanding signs only for shopping centers and only to identify the name of the shopping, center, with tenants names not allowed. Section 16D(5). The number of ground signs should be limited to one. Section 17. A provision should be adopted that prohibits any signs showing pictures of human figures, animals, or food except for logos that have been approved by the City Council or a sign commission. Section 17. All off site signs should be prohibited. See discussion at Section 22. Section 17. Signage on vending machines should be prohibited (better yet, vending machines should not be permitted only in the interior of a business). Section 17G. Interior illuminated signs should permit only translucent letters and not translucent background. This would permit signs such as the Prudential sign at FM 1709 and Whites Chapel, but would prohibit the signs with a white illuminated background and (be dark letters. • Page 3 EB-€ detract from the aesthetics of the city. The Section 17J. Subdivision marketing signs content is generally ignored by the public, and they arguably serve no real purpose. They are a continual source of negative comments from residents. The new city council can make a statement by banning them immediately. There is no valid reason for an 18 month delay. Most of the signs are old and in poor condition. Any new ones can be used in other cities. Section 19B. Only one menuboard per site should be permitted. We should discourage, not encourage, fast food restaurants. Section 18C(2). There does not appear to be a valid reason for having a subdivision directory sign in addition to an entry sign at every street entrance. Section 18D. Recommend that Alternative A be adopted. Section 18E. Service stations present a somewhat unique situation from a signage perspective. The proposal of section 18E evidences this situation in Southlake. Germantown's approach is to have a separate section that regulates signage for service stations. The Germantown approach should be studied. See section 17-30 of the Germantown Ordinance. (we Section 20A. These items are purely advertising and have little to do with identifying the location of a business. These items should be prohibited with the exception of banners for new openings or reopenings under new management. Pennants and streamers should be prohibited., Section 20B. Balloons and floating devices should be prohibited. The gorilla over the roof of Pa adise Tanning is not what Southlake is all about. Section 20C. Model home signs should be ground signs only. A ground sign serves the purpose of identifying the model signs just as a real estate sign identifies a home that is for sale. Section 20D. The concept of a special purpose sign is very vague. To the extent that they are allowed, they should be tightly regulated and should require approval by a sign commission or by city council. The present limitation is four. How does this conform with the limit on attached and freestanding signs? In any event, only one should be allowed. Section 20F. The development sign permitted under section 20G adequately identifies a commercial or residential development. There is no need for an additional construction sign(a typical example is a bank financing sign). Construction signs should not be (lire permitted. Section 21 C. The maximum number of signs should be one per street frontage. Page 4 8 13" L Section 21 D. The coverage allowed should be further reduced to not occupy more than 15% of the window opening. This would adopt the rule in Germantown. Sec. 17- 48(c)(5), Germantown Ordinance. A window sign should be defined to include anything within three feet of a window. See Sec. 17-1, Germantown Ordinance. Section 22. Off-site development signs should be prohibited. Germantown prohibits them. Section 17-4(5). Austin prohibits them. Section 13-2-863(1). Confirm They are not intended to identify a place of business but rather are advertising. Section 23(1). Signs on vehicles should be prohibited where they are intended to be stationary advertising signs. The 72 hour reference in this section is too long considering the incentive to use vehicle signs on"race days." This reference should be changed to 28 hours. Furthermore, it should also be prima facie evidence if the vehicle is parked within 30 feet of the right of way for more than 8 hours. - Section 24. The reference to permit renewal suggests that this language was taken from an ordinance that required annual renewals of sign permits. Southlake ordinance presently does not require renewals. Is it possible to require amortization of nonconforming signs. My recollection is that Houston has such a requirement. Example of Potential Signage under Proposed Ordinance. Consider a fast food restaurant at a corner on FM 1709. Two attached signs are allowed. Two monument signs are allowed because there are two street frontages. Two ground signs are allowed. Two menuboard signs are allowed if freestanding signs continue to be allowed. Window signs can cover 25% of the surface of the windows. Two banners'are allowed. An unlimited number of pennants are allowed. An unlimited number of streamers are allowed. One big balloon is allowed. An unlimited number of small balloons are allowed. Query whether special purpose signs are also allowed. Is this the proper approach to maintain the residential character of Southlake? Page5 g�� I 1 GERMANTOWN CODE (1110, Sec. 17-30. Service stations. • 1 (a) General. This section shall apply to only those properties solely engaged in the retail petroleum and petroleum products business. • (b) Allowable signs: . 1. One (1) ground-mounted or wall-mounted brand identification sign per street frontage. 2. One (1) non-illuminated permanent price sign per street front. 3. Two (2) non-illuminated self-service or full-service signs per pump island. 4. Federal and state stamps, octane readings, pump use directions, no . smoking signs as required by federal, state and local authorities. 1 • 5. Temporary signs as approved by the design review commission. (c) Size: I • 1. Brand identification signs: a. Wall signs shall have a maximum total sign area of fifty (50) square I feet, or one-half square foot for each lineal foot of building frontage on a public street, -whichever results in the smaller sign area. • . . . f • -- b. ' Ground-mounted signs shall be limited to • a maximum of forty (40) (isw . square feet per face. • • • 2. Price signs shall have •a maximum total sign area of sixteen (141 I square feet and'rio more than ten (10) square feet per face. ;3. Self-service signs and/or full-service signs shall have a maximum A. total area per sign of one hundred sixty (160) square inches. I 4. federal and state stamps, octane ratings, pump use directions, no smoking signs and . other mandatory signs and stamps shall be as required by the.governing authority. (d) Location: 1. Brand identification signs: a. Wall signs shall be face-mounted on the building wall unless approved otherwise by the design review commission. Wall-mounted signs shall not project more than twelve (12) inches from the face of the building. Signs shall not project above the roof line or be mounted on' any part of the roof. • • • _ b. Ground-mounted signs shall be set back a minimum of thirty (30) feet from • face - of- curb .or edge of pavement of any street. The height of the sign' shall • be a maximum of six (6) feet as measured from surrounding grade. Where a sign is orientated parallel to the street - and is three (3).. eet or less in height, the design review commission may allow a setback of less distance than the above requirement. 2. Price signs shall be set a minimum of ten (10) feet from face of curb or edge of pavement of any street and in all cases behind the side . (orie walk and no closer than sixty (60)- feet from any two intersecting::::• street face of curbs or edge of pavement. The total height of the?.. •:.t sign shall not exceed four (4) feet as measured from surrounding . — grade. (3) Self-serve signs shall be located on the ends of the pump islands with sign face perpendicular to the street right-of-way. They are to be affixed to canopy support poles, end pumps, or affixed to the tor' canopy. Self-service signs are to be located at a height not to exceed seven (7) feet as measured from surrounding grade. (4) All no smoking signs, federal and state stamps, octane ratings, pump use directions shall be placed on the body of the gasoline pump. (e) Content: (1) Brand identification signs shall contain only the accepted logo or brand name. (2) Price signs shall identify fuel products only, cash, self-serve and/or full serve. Letters and/or numbers on price signs shall be a maximum of ten (10) inches in height but not less than three (3) inches in height. Background shall be dark and letters light in color. (3) Trim, to include company slogans, the use of decorative logos or trademarks, and striping, shall be located and be of such size and content as approved by the design review commission. (4) All lighted exterior signs shall be extinguished when the service station is not open for public business. (5) Self-service signs and full-service signs shall have a maximum letter height of three (3) inches) . Backgrounds shall be dark and letters light in color. (Ord. No. . 1976-5, sec. 4-602(2.5), 2-15-77; Ord. No. 1982-11, 9-27-82; Ord. 1985-20, 1-13-86) Sec. 17-31. Office Parks. (a) Generally. This section shall apply to all office .parks. Office parks are defined as follows: 'A property intended and designed as a unit for occupancy by several tenants requiring office space as opposed to space for retail or other uses, and having drives, parking areas and other' facilities as may be needed by such tenants. (b) Allowable Signs: (Office parks only) (1) Building Identification Signs - A building identification sign mounted flat against the building wall provided said wall contains the main entrance. a. More than one wall sign may be allowed with approval of the design review commission when there is more than one main entrance. 1074 gB, �ra- I § 17-3 GERMANTOWN CODE I Sec. 17.3. Nonconforming signs. I (a) Any sign which is found to exist in violation of this section shall be removed after thirty(30) days' notice. If the owner or lessee faiLs to remove the subject sign in the allowed time an independent contractor shall be secured and the charge assessed to the owner. See section 17-7(d) for sign removal. (b) Any sign which lawfully exists within an existing office park at the time of enactment I of this chapter shall be allowed to remain until such time as the sign is substantially altered or changed or until such time as another sign is proposed in lieu of the existing sign,such sign to be in conformance with all other provisions of this chapter. I (c) Any sign which lawfully exists within the OG district at the time of enactment of this ' chapter shall be allowed to remain until such time as the sign is substantially changed or altered or until such time as another sign is proposed in lieu of the existing sign, such signs to be in conformance with all provisions of this chapter. (Ord. No. 1976-5, § 4-605, 2-15-77; Ord.No. 1986-23, 12-24-86; Ord. No. 1986-32, 12-24-86) 1 Sec. 17.4. Prohibited signs. The following types of signs are prohibited under this chapter: 1 (1). Signs which show pictures of human figures, animals, or food, except for design ....L. •=review commission approved logos, and signs which contain characters, cartoons, or 1 CA statements of an obscene, indecent, or immoral character which would offend public r >•.morals or decency; (2) Signs which contain or are an imitation of an official traffic sign or signal or contain I the works "stop," "go slow," "caution," "danger," "warning," or similar words; (3) Signs which are of a size, location, movement, content, coloring, or manner or illu- mination which may be confused with or construed as a traffic control device or which hide from view any traffic or street sign or signal; (4) Changeable copy signs with interchangeable letters, except that changeable copy I signs are allowed for secondary schools and churches as provided under section 17-28; (5) Signs which advertise an activity,business, product or service not conducted on the...) I premises upon which the sign is located; (6) Signs which have any moving parts; (7) Changing signs(automatic or flashing);including all changing exterior signs and any changing interior signs that are visible from outside the building within which the . signs are located; , 1 (8) Signs which contain or consist of street banners,pennants,ribbons,balloons,streamers, strings of light bulbs, spinners or other similar materials and devices illuminated or • , L nonilluminated,that are used to attract the attention of clients,potential customers .. . and/or the general public are prohibited,except when allowed by special permit by the board of mayor and aldermen; Supp.No.1 • 1064, 5 —i3 1 SIGNS Sec. 17-48 d. Banners shall not be installed more than fifteen (15) days Aime before an event and they shall be removed within two (2) days after the termination of the event. In no case shall any banner be allowed for a period of more than thirty (30) days. (10) Posters advertising charitable or nonprofit events and other events which serve to inform the public about an event of general interest. (11) New Project Real Estate Sign. One (1) sign per street frontage for a a maximum period of one (1) year. (c) LE : (1) Construction signs shall have a sign area not to exceed fifty (50) square feet. , (2) Real - estate signs shall have a sign area of one (1) face not to exceed twenty-five (25) square feet. In no case shall the total sign area exceed fifty (50) square feet. (3) Street banners shall be as approved by the board of mayor and aldermen.* • (4) Signs announcing openings -shall have a sign area of one (1) face not to exceed twenty-five (25) square feet and the total sign area not to • exceed fifty (50) square feet, except that the design review Ilie commission may allow a larger sign . area for multiple tenants if warranted. J (5) Show window signs shall not occupy:more than fifteen (15) percent of the window opening. . , (6) Seasonal or special occasion signs shall have a' sign area of one (1) face not to exceed eight (8) square feet, and the total' sign area - shall not exceed sixteen (16) square feet. - (7) Real •estate window signs shall not exceed three (3) square feet. (8) Reserved. (9) Banners: • a. Street banners as approved by the board of mayor and aldermen. b. Other banners: Maximum size shall be sixty (60) square feet. . 1 '(10) Posters shall not exceed three (3) square feet. d • . *Editor's note - Refer to paragraph (9) within the pertinent subsection for further provisions relative to banners in general. 1079 .1.1 . 11 g - i4 Cie 1 ORDINANCE NO. 704 2 SIGN ORDINANCE 3 4 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE 5 REGULATION OF SIGNS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF 6 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS AND 7 PURPOSES FOR THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; 8 PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR 9 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING FOR 10 THE ISSUANCE AND REVOCATION OF SIGN PERMITS; 11 PROVIDING FOR THE REMOVAL OF SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR 12 APPEALS AND VARIANCES; PROVIDING FOR LIMITATIONS 13 ON THE LOCATION, SETBACK, HEIGHT, SIZE, LIGHTING 14 AND OTHER REGULATIONS OF SIGNS; PROHIBITING 15 CERTAIN SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPT SIGNS; 16 ALLOWING NONCOMMERCIAL (IDEOLOGICAL) COPY ON 17 SIGNS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE 18 CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A 19 SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR 20 VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; 21 PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; Le22 PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL 23 NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 24 25 WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its 26 charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas 27 Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and 28 WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Southlake finds that the uncontrolled 29 proliferation of signs is hazardous to users of streets and highways within the City of 30 Southlake and will adversely affect the safety and efficiency of the city's transportation 31 network; and 32 WHEREAS, the city council further finds that scenic resources are distributed 33 throughout the city and have contributed greatly to its economic development by 34 attracting tourists,permanent residents, and new businesses and cultural facilities; and 35 WHEREAS, the city council further finds that unless the location, number, 36 setback lighting and size of signs are regulated, the scattering of such signs throughout L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFr\SIGM704\DRAFT-8 DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 ' Page i 8E v • ,► 1 the city would be detrimental to the preservation of those scenic resources and so to the 2 economic base of the city; and 3 WHEREAS, the city council has further determined that the proliferation of signs 4 in the city has an adverse affect on adjacent properties; and 5 WHEREAS, the city council has heretofore developed and adopted a 6 comprehensive plan guiding the orderly and proper growth of the city in order to promote 7 the public health, safety,welfare and aesthetics; and 8 WHEREAS, the city council finds that the orderly and uniform regulation of 9 signs is a substantial factor in guiding the attractive and aesthetic development of 10 properties in accordance with the comprehensive plan and thereby avoiding detrimental 11 impacts of signs on the appearance of the city; and 12 WHEREAS, the city council further finds that the regulations adopted herein (ise13 allow for a reasonable use of signs by businesses, residences and other properties for 14 advertisement, dissemination of protected speech and other purposes; and 15 WHEREAS, the city council finds that, in addition to the above findings, the 16 adoption of this ordinance will serve the following purposes: 17 To preserve, protect, and enhance areas of historical, architectural, 18 cultural, aesthetic, and economic value regardless of whether they are 19 natural or manmade; 20 To protect adjacent and nearby properties, in particular, residentially 21 zoned properties from the impact of lighting, size, height, movement, and 22 location of signs; 23 To protect the safety and efficiency of the City's transportation network by 24 reducing the confusion or distraction to motorists and enhancing the 25 motorist's ability to see pedestrians, obstacles, other vehicles, and traffic L26 signs; 27 To enhance the impression of the City which is conveyed to tourists and 28 visitors by controlling the location,number, and size of signs; L:\CITYDOCS\ORDNDRAF.SIGN\704\DRAFr-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 1 _ Page ii („e1 To integrate sign regulations more effectively with other regulations by 2 establishing requirements for setbacks, height, and spacing to allow for 3 lighting, ventilation, and preservation of views in a manner consistent with 4 land uses in the various zoning districts; and 5 To preserve and enhance the appearance of the City and the public interest 6 in aesthetics, and to control and reduce visual clutter and blight; and 7 4:. 11r:4 q 4.a I.I. iat ca,t0M1" a 8 °lilt;. §a, '3j ;,: J ia4 t ®99i.<�Wv`d;� � 59 SITA 9 'WHEREAS, the city council deems it necessary to adopt this ordinance in order 10 to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 12 THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Li 13 SECTION 1. 14 The attached regulations are hereby adopted as the Si gnOrdinance of the City of 15 Southlake: 16 SECTION 2. 17 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of 18 Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with 19 the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such 20 ordinances are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 506 ��4€ � , is hereby repealed. 21 SECTION 3. 22 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, 23 clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any 24 phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared 25 unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, L26 such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, 27 paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the L\crrYnocs\o�nRAFnsIGDA7o4\uwAFr-s.noc Draft#8—August14,1998 13 - 1 '1 Page iii 1 City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional 2 phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3 SECTION 4. 4 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses 5 to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance 6 shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day 7 that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 8 SECTION 5. 9 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and 10 all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 506``-,r', as amended, or any other 11 ordinances affecting the regulation of signs which have accrued at the time of the 12 effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending L13 litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, 14 same shall not be affected bythis ordinance but maybeprosecuted until final disposition 15 by the courts. 16 SECTION 6. 17 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this 18 ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the 19 operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in 20 all courts without further proof than the production thereof. 21 SECTION 7. 22 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the 23 proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time 24 and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of 25 this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or L26 forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall 27 additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City L:\cmrDOCS\ORD DRAF\SIGN 7O4\ RAFT-s.DOC Draft#8-August14,1998 Page iv (me 1 newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required q by 2 Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. 3 SECTION 8. 4 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and 5 publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 6 C C L\crrYnocs\oRD nDRAFtnsIorn7at\DRm..s.Doc Draft#8—August14,1998 (5)3 Page v Cle 1 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY 2 OF , 1998. 3 4 5 6 7 MAYOR 8 9 ATTEST: 10 11 12 13 CITY SECRETARY 14 15 16 17 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS 18 DAY OF , 1998. 19 20 21 Cope 22 23 MAYOR 24 25 ATTEST: 26 27 28 29 CITY SECRETARY 30 31 32 33 EFFECTIVE: 34 35 36 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 37 38 39 40 41 42 City Attorney 43 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFrSIGM7O4\DRAFr-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 8B 0 Page vi L1 SIGN ORDINANCE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 4 ARTICLE I-IN GENERAL 1 5 6 SEC. 1 DEFINITIONS 1 7 A. GENERAL 1 8 9 ARTICLE II-ADMINISTRATION 4 10 11 SEC.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENFORCEMENT 4 12 13 SEC.3 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED 4 14 15 SEC.4 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT 5 16 17 SEC.5 FEES 5 18 19 SEC.6 CONDITIONAL SIGN PERMIT 5 20 21 SEC.7 REVOCATION OF PERMITS 5 22 23 SEC. 8 INSPECTION 6 24 25 SEC.9 PERMIT VALID FOR ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY(180)DAYS 6 (spe 26 27 SEC. 10 INVESTIGATION FEES: WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT 6 28 29 SEC. 11 REMOVAL OF SIGNS 6 30 A. OBSOLETE SIGNS. 6 31 B. UNSAFE,DILAPIDATED OR DETERIORATED SIGNS. 6 32 C. SIGNS ON UTILITY POLES 7 33 D. SIGNS IN RIGHT-OF-WAY Aop I x , e 7 34 '9 E j � a :• t 7 35 E,.f: EXTENT OF SIGN REMOVAL 7 36 37 SEC. 12 FILING OF LIENS AGAINST PROPERTY 7 38 39 ARTICLE III-APPEALS AND VARIANCES 8 40 41 SEC. 13 APPEALS 8 42 43 SEC. 14 VARIANCES 8 44 45 ARTICLE IV-GENERAL SIGN PROVISIONS 8 46 47 SEC. 15 WIND PRESSURE AND DEAD LOAD REQUIREMENTS 8 48 49 SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS 9 50 A. ATTACHED SIGN 9 51 B. MONUMENT SIGN 10 53 D. 10 53 D. GROUND SIGN 12 54 55 SEC. 17 PROHIBITED SIGNS 12 56 A. GENERAL 12 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTSIGN\704\DRAFT-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 8B_p_/ Page vii 1 B. OBSCENE SIGNS 12 2 C. OBSTRUCTING DOORS,WINDOWS,OR FIRE ESCAPES 12 3 D. OBSTRUCTING VISION/SIGHT TRIANGLE 12 4 E. INTERFERENCE WITH TRAFFIC 12 5 F. PORTABLE SIGNS 12 6 �G CERTAIN ILLUMINATED SIGNS P 13 7 H. SIGNS PROJECTING ON/OVER PUBLIC PROPERTY 8 0 a €Cc t ( 1jj'0) ,', 13 9 I. ROOF SIGNS 13 10 n siCti 6V. I. 11 1_ .,,ai ) ., 13 11 12 ARTICLE V-SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS 13 13 14 SEC. 18 SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS 13 15 16 SEC. 19 SPECIFIC REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ON SITE vI(4* 1'SIGNS 17 REQUIRING PERMIT 13 18 A. BUSINESS SIGNS 13 19 B. MENUBOARD SIGNS 13 20 C. SUBDIVISION SIGNS 14 21 fr SUBDIVISION ENTRY SIGNS 14 22 x :10 z 14 23 # i' "a: ) g 14 24 i o 1$ 41 14 25 T a 1! ( '` 15 Le 26 44 i:111S*34°P'-1 4reb5,` 27 28 ( �a 1 ` ' ,M3040 3 '_ �4, l p, h a t 15 29 .lS � (� 15 30 31 SEC.24 aTEMPORARY SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT 15 32 A. BANNERS,PENNANTS,AND STREAMERS 15 33 gA. BALLOONS AND OTHER FLOATING DEVICES 15 34 G. MODEL HOME SIGNS 16 35 D.;us SPECIAL PURPOSE SIGNS 16 36 g. SEARCH LIGHTS 16 37 li. al CONSTRUCTION SIGNS 16 38 C. DEVELOPMENT SIGNS 17 39 40 SEC.24-Ei TEMPORARY SIGNS EXEMPT FROM PERMIT 17 41 A. SUBDIVISION MARKETING SIGNS 17 42 B. !o <SIGNS 17 43 C. REAL ESTATE SIGNS 17 44 D. WINDOW SIGNS 17 45 E. GARAGE/YARD SALE SIGNS 18 46 47 SEC. 22 SPECIFIC REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO 48 OFF SITS SIGNS REQUIPn.1G PE IT 18 49 A, 18 50 51 ARTICLE VI-EXEMPTIONS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS 18 52 53 SEC.23 EXEMPT SIGNS 18 54 55 SEC.24 NONCONFORMING EXISTING SIGNS 19 56 L:\C1TYDOCS\ORD\DRAF\SIGN\704\DRAFr-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 RE _- 2_- Page viii 1 SEC.25 SIGN COPY 19 2 3 SEC.26 APPENDICES 19 C C L:\crrYDocsORD DRAF SIGN\7oe\DnAFT-s.noc Draft#8—August14,1998 Fp- Page ix L1 ARTICLE I-IN GENERAL 2 3 SEC. 1 DEFINITIONS 4 5 A. GENERAL 6 7 ALTER: To change the size, shape or outline, or type of sign or to change the electrical lighting, 8 except for the replacement of lamps not brighter than the original or the replacement of a surface 9 panel. 10 11 ATTACH: To stick, tack, nail or otherwise affix a sign to any object; to paint, stencil, write, or 12 otherwise mark on an object. 13 14 BUILDING:'A structure which has a roof supported by walls for the shelter,support,or enclosure 15 of persons,animals,or chattel. 16 17 BUILDING OFFICIAL: The Building Official of the City of Southlake,Texas,or his designee. 18 19 COMMENCEMENT OF WORK: For construction of a sign shall be the point in time when the 20 sign has been delivered to the site and attachment to a building has begun or holes are excavated 21 for ground installation. 22 23 DILAPIDATED OR DETERIORATED CONDITION: Any sign which in the opinion of the 24 building official has any of the following characteristics: 25 L26 (a)Where elements of the surface or background can be seen, as viewed from the normal 27 viewing distance, to have portions of the finished material or paint flaked,broken off, or 28 missing,or otherwise not in harmony with the rest of the surface;or 29 (b) Where the structural support or frame members are visibly bent, broken, dented, or 30 torn;or 31 (c) Where the panel is visibly cracked, or in the case of wood and similar products, 32 splintered in such a way as to constitute an unsightly or harmful condition;or 33 (d)Where the sign or its elements are twisted or leaning or at angles other than those at 34 which it was originally erected(such as may result from being blown or the failure of a 35 structural support);or 36 (e)Where the message or wording can no longer be clearly read by a person with normal 37 eyesight under normal viewing conditions;or 38 39 DISTANCE: Distance of signs from R.O.W. shall mean the shortest horizontal distance from the 40 nearest R.O.W. to a vertical line to the ground from the nearest element of the sign or the shortest 41 horizontal distance in a straight line between the nearest elements of signs. 42 43 ERECT: To build, construct, attach, hang, place, suspend or affix. This shall also include the 44 painting of signs on the exterior surface of a building or structure. 45 46 FACADE: Any separate face of a building,including parapet walls and omitted wall lines, or any 47 part of a building which encloses or covers usable space. Where separate faces are oriented in the 48 same direction, or in the directions within 45 degrees of one another,they are to be considered as 49 part of a single facade. 50 51 GROSS SURFACE AREA OR AREA OF A SIGN: The area of to smanect rectangle which L52 ns va erth s •Ntr■: e li nee efa:■ es ex;ludmg terr sta,ct„ro f r_the s Methods 53 of area measurement shall be in accordance with Appendix'A'. 54 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DR AFI SIGN\704\DRAF[-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 (R_2 4 Page 1 1 HEIGHT: As applied to a sign, height shall be measured as the vertical distance between the 2 highest part of the sign or its supporting structure, whichever is higher, and natural grade at the 3 center of the base of the sign(see Appendix'A'for clarification). 4 5 ILLUMINATION: The enhancement of a sign utilizing electric lights, luminous tubes or other 6 similar means. 7 8 LEASE SPACE: An area of a building separated internally and intended for use by an individual 9 tenant. 10 11 LOGO: Any (-;aa :a" of an organization, individual, company, or 12 product which is commonly used in advertising to identify that organization, individual,company, 13 or product. 14 15 OBSOLETE: Any sign which advertises a business,use or purpose that is no longer in existence. 16 17 PAD SITE: A tract, lot, or land lease intended for the single use of a freestanding building 18 typically adjacent to street R.O.W.and may also be a portion of a tract or lot. 19 20 ' j. t ' ' ' ° d ;''aF_a i' • �?: I. as> a> ;•• ,4431 99 S Ji 21 ni la k17),!' 22 23 SETBACK: The distance from the closest portion,whether the support or edge of the sign,to the 24 right-of-way. 25 Ce, 26 SIGHT TRIANGLE: There shall be two different sight triangles as depicted in the Subdivision 27 Ordinance. One shall be for public and/or private street intersections and the other for the 28 intersection of private non-single family driveways with public or private streets. 29 30 SIGN: Every sign, name, number, identification, description, and announcement, declaration, 31 demonstration, device, display, flag, banner, pennant, illustration, logo, balloon, streamer, 32 valance, advertising display, poster, beacon, light or insignia, and structure supporting any of the 33 same, affixed directly or indirectly to or upon any building or outdoor structure, or erected or 34 maintained upon a piece of land, which directs attention to any object, project, service, place, 35 activity,person,institution,organization,or business. 36 37 SIGN, ATTACHED: Any sign attached to, applied on, or supported by any part of a building 38 (including canopy fascia,walls and awnings)which encloses or covers usable space. 39 40 SIGN,BANNER: A temporary flag '•. as �- � cloth,flexible plastic or canvas material. 41 42 yeti � . .. ( yiaLi)T,° '-tg a .01d4 ...jai 4i.s.... aaT ...... (e6, a°t : a k 7 q:a,,.. s s' 43 .....�......i 44 45 `(AL,: 21 4: F .a......aPn, f, ais-,�.iflC ag ia1 ar$,:xte §93 st ;, at.-. .., jaia a to 46 (two t t \liana £a;si Isi13e .,.. ... .nr, 47 48 SIGN, BUSINESS: A permanent on-site sign that is used to identify a business, profession, 49 organization, institution, service, product, activity or other nonresidential use conducted, sold or 50 offered on the site where such sign is located. This sign may also identify the name of the site or 51 development or may identify the occupants within the site or development.(isie, 52 53 SIGN CONS-T UCTION: A t identifying to p pet«., h tect, vivr�,-evs a:: v v::v:ra :: �::::^pv:::^Tv:^: ei�i a""' o r��r 54 55 56 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFI\SIGN\704\DRAFr-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 —,2 Page 2 L1 SIGN, DEVELOPMENT: A temporary sign providing identification or information 2 pertaining to a residential or commercial development to include /i- builders, !lop. 3 a e •5a •Ci`La!kx .iii-!n?. $ afi+ •t!•�- a a �.+�t a .a1;:5.+ #� :ai�. i _ within that 4 development, to-A ` a i.1.(44a1! .:+ao ,#,ia"'a rTi' ,r. ra'• 5 6 SIGN, DIRECTIONAL: A permanent on-site sign intended to aid in vehicular movement on the 7 site. 8 9 SIGN, DIRECTORY: A temporary ••+a,•i.(4-0 on-site sign providing direction to or identifying 10 the buildings in the g a ;° �+• +�. 11 12 LIGN ENTRY. Any p e„t on cite identijin„a sidential s„bdivision and-locates - 13 site. 14 15 ` \ c ;4.,""i ;.yi .-,,5 r:a'zs :j.a`,day°" ,.ay ass€ �d•} f'a i,t i i�„_N,ta ae ,�q�1�. �J.�'°.5:�'6 ,b� a�6etst #fait 16 17 18 • 19 20 21 SIGN, GARAGE/YARD SALE: A temporary sign intended to advertise garage sales or yard 22 sales. 23 24 SIGN,-,C `.S y-E 'V `EW �. as. a-tit! a a a, �!.,:i Ie A - i"a s1a tl 25 0+ + ,2aa_� i P?�� �a a , „• t t+ .* i ?e! w 3A4... - 'c r a: ,- g 26 27 28 SIGN,GOVERNMENT: A sign erected by or on behalf of a federal,state or local government or 29 an agency thereof. 30 31 SIGN,GROUND: A....temp,ran. • tea e.«: l 1, ,.,a„tee t • ril„f r real 32 • . . 33 '' Q. 34 35 36 ,„, a , tiYei f e aj"§a i at-444140'sta.. ia; ! s. !a ma aaiaa�a+t {a:tt: 37 , -� ..• e,:� ,�1, *t*, (definition for Option 'A' - to regulate 38 institutional signs) 39 40 SIGN, MENUBOARD: A sign which displays a menu and pricing for food services and may 41 include an audible speaker and microphone integral to the sign. 42 43 SIGN, MODEL HOME: A temporary real estate sign identifying a homebuilder's model home 44 open for inspection. 45 46 SIGN, MONUMENT: Any sign which is connected to the ground and which has no clear space 47 for the full width of the sign between the bottom of the sign and the surface of the ground. 48 49 SIGN, OFF-SITE: A sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service, good, 50 product, or entertainment not related to the site upon which such sign is located or to which it is 51 affixed. 52 53 SIGN, ON-SITE: Any sign, the content of which relates to the site on which it is located, 54 referring exclusively to businesses, commodities, services, products, goods, or entertainment on 55 the site,or the sale,lease,or construction of those sites. 56 L:\CITYDOCs\ORD\DRAFr.SIGN\704\DRAFI-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 Page 3 1 SIGN,POLITICAL: A type of off-site sign which refers only to the candidates or issues involved (iipe 2 in a political election. 3 4 SIGN,PORTABLE: Any sign which is not attached or affixed to the ground, a building,vehicle, 5 or other fixed structure or object. Portable signs include those signs installed on wheels, trailers, 6 skids,and similar mobile structures. 7 8 SIGN, READERBOARD (electronic): A sign that utilizes alternating electronic data control 9 components. 10 11 SIGN, READERBOARD (manual): A sign comprised of non-permanent letters, numerals or 12 symbols, which allows a change of sign copy by adding, removing or rearranging said letters, 13 symbols or numerals. 14 15 SIGN,REAL ESTATE: A temporary sign intended to advertise real estate for sale or lease. 16 17 SIGN, SPECIAL PURPOSE: A temporary sign, 18 sign, that is either on-site or off-site that provides identification or information pertaining to a 19 special event or occurrence ti« a a r e:gaE 3 it »i ; a. i-5ae� .a a as 20 21 a';� a" �aaa 3 s ante ss;aa its}�, 22 23 SIGN, SUBDIVISION MARKETING: A temporary sign used to market or advertise residential 24 subdivisions ceders :; ir41,tte and 11 direct interested persons to the subdivision 25 location. coe 26 27 SIGN,TEMPORARY: Any sign constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wallboard, 28 or other like materials,with or without frames, and any type sign not permanently attached to the 29 ground,wall,or building,intended to be displayed for a short period of time only. 30 31 SIGN, TRADESMAN: A temporary on site sign identifying the contractor performing a 32 33 34 SIGN,VEHICULAR: Any sign which is affixed to a vehicle. 35 36 SIGN, WINDOW: Any sign located on the internal and/or external surface of the window, or is 37 located within two feet(2')of the window,of any establishment. 38 39 SITE: A lot,tract or pad site. 40 41 42 43 ARTICLE II-ADMINISTRATION 44 45 SEC.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENFORCEMENT 46 47 It is the responsibility of the Building Official to interpret, administer and enforce the 48 requirements of this ordinance. 49 50 SEC.3 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED 51 (10,, 52 No person shall erect, alter or display any sign nor shall any person allow the erection, alteration 53 or display of any sign upon any property within the City owned or controlled by him without first 54 obtaining a permit to do so from the City of Southlake, except as hereinafter provide 55 56 [:\CITYDocs\ortr»DRAFnSIGrnra\owAFr-8.Doc Draft#8—August14,1998 f zp--7 Page 4 1 SEC.4 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT 2 3 Application for a permit shall be made as required by this ordinance and the following 4 information shall be submitted as separate documents: 5 a. Application form shall be completed. 6 b. General plan that illustrates: 7 - Location of the building, structure, or tract to which or upon which the sign is to be 8 attached or erected. 9 - Position of the sign in relation to rights-of-way, easements, buildings, structures, 10 existing signs,etc. 11 c. Sign drawing that illustrates height, length, width, and all other dimensions associated 12 with the sign. 13 d. Letter from owner of the property stating that the applicant has permission to erect such 14 signs. 15 16 SEC.5 FEES 17 18 E. All fees for sign permits shall be in accordance with the current fee schedule adopted by the City 19 Council. 20 21 :iifi 3 al a`-;s 40 a-':ja, :i 5 s Asa s a } i¢ae . `1$22 , ri ®a(*•4 x} tlam; 'a,ae::a3�': • 23 [Current fee schedule as follows: permanent sign = $50 for up to first 100 sf. + $1 for each additional 24 sf., not to exceed$100; temporary signs =$25.] 25 Le 26 SEC. 6 CONDITIONAL SIGN PERMIT 27 28 A. GENERAL: Notwithstanding anything in this ordinance to the contrary,the erection of a sign or 29 signs may be approved pursuant to this section under a conditional sign permit approved by the 30 City Council. The purpose of this section is to allow for a specialized review of signs which may 31 not be appropriate generally without certain restrictions,but which, if controlled as to the number, 32 size,height, color, location, lighting, or relation to adjacent properties, would promote the health, 33 safety, and welfare of the community. Conditional permitting of signs shall not be based upon 34 the content of the sign, but is intended to allow for the evaluation of the physical impact of the 35 proposed sign on adjacent properties and to ensure adequate mitigation of potentially unfavorable 36 factors, such as the number, size, height, color, location, lighting, and other potentially 37 unfavorable impacts. 38 39 B. APPLICATION: An application for a conditional sign permit shall be submitted to the Building 40 Official and shall include all documents as required by Section 4 of this ordinance. Additionally, 41 the applicant shall submit construction plans drawn by a registered professional engineer or 42 architect in the State of Texas and also provide renderings of the particular sign types, facades, 43 materials,compositions,dimensions,lighting,and colors. 44 45 C. FEES: Fees for conditional sign permits shall be determined in accordance with ?- 46 adopted ' r in f a A dnnn:6tatiwo Code mall iag Tab1 , 47 _ e 48El 13 44 t,' # .°a� 1m 3` a r �ajrl 3. at-v°�i3 {." 3,, m1,4 t3„®s,,evi€ „y�ila iffi�Yer C�JiC 49 50 51 SEC.7 REVOCATION OF PERMITS C., 52 53 The Building Official may suspend or revoke any permit issued under the provisions of this 54 ordinance whenever it is determined that the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect 55 or false information supplied, or whenever such permit is issued in violation of any of the 56 provisions of this ordinance or any other ordinance of this City or laws of this state or the federal L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAF\SIGM704\DRAFf-8.DOC Draft#8-August14,1998 ep Page 5 1 government. Such suspension or revocation shall be effective when communicated in writing to 2 the person to whom the permit is issued, the owner of the sign, or the owner of the site upon 3 which the sign is located. Upon such revocation, all construction related to the revoked permit 4 shall cease. 5 6 A person may appeal the revocation of the sign permit to the City Council by filing an appeal in 7 accordance with this ordinance. The City Council shall affirm,reverse, or modify the suspension 8 or revocation and such decision shall be final. 9 10 Upon final determination that the permit is properly revoked, any portion of the sign in place as a 11 result of the permit shall be removed within 10 days by the owner of the sign or the owner of the 12 site on which the sign is located. Failure to remove the sign shall be deemed a violation of this 13 ordinance. 14 15 SEC. 8 INSPECTION 16 17 The Building Official shall periodically inspect each sign regulated by this ordinance for the 18 purpose of ascertaining whether the same is obsolete and whether it is in need of removal or 19 repair. 20 21 SEC. 9 PERMIT VALID FOR ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY(180)DAYS 22 23 If the work authorized by a permit issued under this ordinance has not been commenced within 24 one hundred eighty(180)days after the date of issuance,the permit shall become null and void. 25 Li 26 SEC. 10 INVESTIGATION FEES: WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT 27 28 A. INVESTIGATION. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this ordinance has 29 been commenced or completed without first obtaining a permit, a special investigation shall be 30 made before a permit may be issued for such work. 31 32 B. FEE. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a 33 permit is then subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the 34 permit fee required by this ordinance. 35 36 SEC. 11 REMOVAL OF SIGNS 37 38 A. OBSOLETE SIGNS. Any sign, which the Building Official determines to be obsolete, shall be 39 removed by the permit holder, owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located. 40 a'. w a ?E? ; °njd a :.a sa? :?{Ji a 11181i a)°0 1.11-sfsef 5, within 41 ten(10) , sx days after receiving written notification to do so from the Building Official. , , 42 _i d®i ri�d$i se :i ,aj c ii; ,, ;�( ,� � «�a3�s�a s;� iCa a e yy %qq��a�,. p p � 5, 43 SRi 9 9F�$f F&t ^`1 ° 95.E _XS..f' 57 f •t S 1 ,',a i Y 1�a i L� a a iii .°4 J,A iiiS 44 !'i. Upon failure to comply with such notice or to file an appeal of the decision in 45 accordance with this ordinance, the Building Official is authorized to cause the removal of such 46 sign, and any expense incident thereto shall be paid by the permit holder, owner of the sign or 47 owner of the site on which the sign is located. 48 49 B. UNSAFE DILAPIDATED OR DETERIORATED SIGNS. If the Building Official determines 50 that any sign is unsafe or insecure, or is dilapidated or deteriorated,he shall give written notice to 51 remove or replace (in accordance with this ordinance) said sign to the person or persons L52 responsible for such sign. If the permit holder,owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the 53 sign is located fails to remove or repair the sign within ten(10)days after such notice or to file an 54 appeal of the decision in accordance with this ordinance, the Building Official is hereby 55 authorized to cause the removal of such sign. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the 56 immediate removal, without notice, of any sign or portion of a sign which is determined by the L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFIISlGNV6/\DRAFT-s.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 �� �� Page 6 L1 Building Official to be an immediate threat or danger to the public health, safety, or welfare. Any 2 expense incident to the removal of a sign pursuant to this paragraph shall be paid by the permit 3 holder, owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located. The removal of the 4 sign or portion of the sign shall be limited to the extent necessary to eliminate the threat to the 5 public health,safety,and welfare. 6 7 C. SIGNS ON UTILITY POLES. 8 9 P6;6014461• .a,a .Q a 0� a a '.� �i '�'�° � �`fe.“- 10 ua an an a i;3 4 4. . ti i . ,,� � ; .s .... a<a�•\ s. 'a r° i The permit 11 holder, owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located shall be charged a sign 12 recovery fee in accordance with the city fee schedule to recover such sign from the City unless the 13 permit holder or owner satisfactorily establishes that such sign was not placed in the right-of-way 14 by the owner of such sign or by any authorized agent, representative, or employee of said owner. 15 Any such sign removed by City personnel may be held for a period of seventy-two(72)hours and 16 upon expiration of such time may be disposed a€. The City is not required to notify the permit 17 holder or owner of the sign that it has been picked up or that disposal of the sign is imminent. 18 19 D. SIGNS IN RIGHT-OF-WAY OR U 4,. ' o ' ' o ' : Any sign that is erected, 20 constructed or otherwise located within or upon public right-of-way •a : may be 21 removed by City personnel and the permit holder or owner of such sign shall be charged a sign 22 recovery fee in accordance with the city fee schedule to recover such sign from the City. No such 23 fee shall be charged if the permit holder or owner satisfactorily establishes that such sign was not 24 placed in the right-of-way by the permit holder or owner of such sign or by any authorized agent, 25 representative or employee of said owner. Any such sign removed by City personnel may be held L26 for a period of seventy-two(72)hours and upon expiration of such time may be disposed of. The 27 City is not required to notify the permit holder or owner of the sign that it has been picked up or 28 that disposal of the sign is imminent. 29 30 ElI G ' ! e+ a s+aaa .aa a a ere a ant(tj a a aia` 3aa 31 w i s a 32 beremov-ra + •aa a a as as a a aa a a- a 0 owne c o3 33 kThich the a s a»- a a✓_ a s 'G 00 0o , as ;a a s ae sii 4.0 34 hedpl co ` 1 ,.ze rna a,e 35 „,. , .11.0itit 41 4- si;41, 36 iw+( a a a `� ae�:r a a :b a " "7.,a "c1,. 37 Q,a a• a 1 A ;q 4i III.- tImm93? a 5 i Y3) a_sae as i§&�.'� a )1° '04A4 003.1 4 ;.i,B.bd&R a✓x isi 38 a.o as a a 1-4 • •• 9. 41(.4 ,a. -Ya v ra r . 39 ,1,-(14k.Tv ,'410ku.k".) .z'' 40 i0 ti I, .1 rs ;a' a 46 a �s �.oa aa? kaa �' aiia aot1i J taa1aa€m 'a =:. 41 10i a '1a '73a0° a4 as aea a a a3 a a a as.a a ,aja &�a rasa 42 the aeaa a. a a a . ia �a aka a 1, b a a a :° a . al 43 44 EXTENT OF SIGN REMOVAL: The Building Official shall determine to what extent the 45 elements of the sign must be removed to comply with this section. This may include any of the 46 following,but is not limited to the following: 47 a. SIGN COPY: Removal of the text or copy portion of the sign. 48 b. SIGN BOX: Removal of the portion of the sign excluding the structural support of the 49 sign. 50 c. ENTIRE SIGN: Removal of all structural elements of the sign. 51 Li52 SEC. 12 FILING OF LIENS AGAINST PROPERTY 53 54 The city is authorized to file a lien against any property which is not otherwise exempt to recover 55 expenses incurred by the city for the removal of a sign or portion of a sign from the property, 56 pursuant to Section 11E. L:\CITYDocs\ORD\DRAFT\SIGN\704\DRAFT-s.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 bB-3 6 Page 7 1 ARTICLE III-APPEALS AND VARIANCES (re 2 3 SEC. 13 APPEALS 4 5 Any decision rendered by the Building Official under this ordinance may be appealed to the City 6 Council by any person, agent, or representative affected by such decision. Such appeal must be 7 received within ten (10) days after the placement of a letter in the U.S. mail addressed to the 8 address on the permit or the address of the current owner of record in the County tax records 9 which states the written decision which has been rendered by the Building Official. Such appeal 10 shall be filed in writing with the Building Official specifying the grounds on which the appeal is 11 based. The Building Official shall forthwith transmit to the City Council all documents pertaining 12 to the appealed action. The City Council shall hear the appeal at a City Council meeting as soon 13 as practicable thereafter to determine whether the decision of the Building Official was in 14 accordance with all ordinances and regulations. The decision of the City Council shall be fmal. 15 16 SEC. 14 VARIANCES 17 18 The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including 19 but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved 20 in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a 21 literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical 22 difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical 23 difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not 24 injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent 25 properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of Li 26 this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the 27 request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed 28 application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule 29 adopted by City Council. 30 31 32 33 ARTICLE IV-GENERAL SIGN PROVISIONS 34 35 SEC. 15 WIND PRESSURE AND DEAD LOAD REQUIREMENTS 36 37 All signs shall be designed and constructed to withstand a wind pressure of not less than thirty 38 (30)pounds per square foot of area and shall be constructed to receive dead loads as required by 39 the Uniform Building Code. The sign permit application must include a statement signed by the 40 applicant which states compliance with this requirement. 41 L L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFI\SIGN\704\DRAFr-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 55 -3/ Page 8 L1 SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS 2 3 A. ATTACHED SIGN 4 5 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this 6 subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this 7 ordinance. Signs may not be attached to light fixtures, poles, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, 8 streets, utility poles, public buildings, fences, railings, public telephone poles, or trees. 9 The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a 10 three(3)square foot area used for building identification. 11 12 2. wit° t J . /MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGH i _t ,a3>ii'%iii "1 'si..:11 A. 13 1 a I61- 1 / a:° +,C The maximum height allowed for letters or logos 14 shall be based on the following criteria: 15 16 Distance From R.O.W.1 Maximum Letter/Logo Height 17 18 Less than 54 1 ft. 24 riinches 19 51 100 ft. 30 inches 20 101 - 150 ft. 34 :: inches 21 151 -200 ft. 42 Y inches 22 201 -250 ft. 45 1, inches 23 251 -300 ft. 54 inches 24 301 and greater 69 inches 26 25L 443 ''�9 g 9 k}1�y yii 1 i i.,;;Vi rims 3 1 a 'g�$$i IT.C3ttrs' it if,7trq_.g4®a� Y1 6u�5 f.,t�l! 277 a ,,..y�,�54^g ,,43 I)i 9II9z.,�61,. A 8114,H1�„aj ...I 'Rai.j,' ''..-..-I.es ,J.,6.1',. �I 28 'LJ"Y.e .0, 29 30 3. MAXIMUM AREA: .1..5 ti:11 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease 31 space not to exceed 400 square feet(see Appendix'A'for further clarification). 32 33 4. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one attached sign pe ` , shall 34 be allowed�-"ot qa i 4 ;vai) on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided 35 in this ordinance. Y.rvi acik;i7 m ,ia, -'ii a q i` 6,,,,.1 r. I a r i 6 , r a .i;r. 36 .$iii:�'iy,„" fa;'..;i.11 5a.,p;i,pt.; v(li t",R.a.,..a .;aa 11,;al(..e aax�� 1$ }a 41/a pYsa�s`,s9«a�•iti6p,' ,i6 , a ,>a;alil 37 ., -4- i�€ ,-,,., a3a j iaro (,`,. acsa -.u,.-, z.g i ,... ;f. 6 to,...('...gee see=a. °.. . 38 iao er-a aiaauabaiiaeaat of da{»dr ;l'Iplp." °a a�s3 ',iai "§4it,r'as ,'mow at( ..+ '6t1',w i an. s s, aas�:a ras=a �s>:i, 39 40 Ii `.:606 .-sii 16 !H0a1Cy.ai '; , e4 c''-, ,4.aa i >ej ,r®t. aa$a ae v iii iii 3' ,€. .- si ,-. 41 42 5. SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five 43 percent(75%) of the width of any building or lease space. die . 1ia i6 x, it a. 44 is -e{I e a t,T,i iI ria r aY sat T 1: a"`1 =;j6;3 . v , tgai a 45 it Ii � i _t iw" i (see Appendix'B'for further clarification). 46 47 6. ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof 48 line of any building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend 49 above the parapet wall. A sir;i ;0, ,46 ., , i 6 ,a al: ill- :4,+ 0 50 a kyi^ia ii'I.a i;,..)1s .4ri•uf(i ail N,.?i(a a0,. ...)at ° ' .)iii- ii,INe ; i 1E)iiita c F-,i,,, ii,., ,., 51 aid , ,,;',;„:„.,-40,, 'ai aY i as i i, ;i an ./e.0 ; a•a di(- - ai ;a i . aa. «.; a,a s :'i s aJ 7 , L52 o a - 1.2 i ila(aa '$€€"'p, �°14 s -.°1=14 C I' 'a° (i. ,raK:'4E<' aiai' 41' '.°, i' i 53 ,, ,•st.Pet€t6.tiiarati+aia ie w itaaa a,' a1,,$s at a a'rtaa: atlaa a_a�i Iasi is{'a,i)aiatsae aaatolibala;a�;ds.• �-, ... 54 atl f..sSal aaYga a •.a... aaa �, a•..{; Id di dtaa,.;i y "„a'«a(i>:` § x a)`'�`ii q-iYaF:1r 1"a1 a�sa;- 55 L:\CITYDOCSAORD\DRAFTSIGN\70ADRAFF-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 fry-.32_ Page 9 • 1 7. ILLUMINATION: Attached signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting 2 ;(94,)}1 3 },. :y x.. ._(O . 704ce)_ letters with exposed neon lighting are 3 allowed. 4 [NOTE: Director of Public Safety, Billy Campbell, has voiced safety concerns of crime and 5 vandalism with respect to attached sign illumination only during posted business hours.] 6 7 8. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") 8 from the building,excluding signs attached to canopies. 9 10 9. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any facade 11 (other than the main front of the building) which faces property zoned for single-family 12 residential uses if the sign is within one hundred fifty feet(150') of the property line of 13 said residential property. 14 15 B. MONUMENT SIGN 16 17 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this 18 subsection shall be applicable to all monument signs which are allowed under this 19 ordinance. 20 � 21 3� i .q�i#� f;ai a 3 .'€ 1� 9� y 1. � it ..... ,1(4 a, (asF ':is..3a: rt) 22 a ,.r.it °a -�. • x"' ea®ae4 .'... 23 24 2. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Six.—(4) 0 feet, excluding monument base. The 25 monument base may be an additional two- -met 1'.,p '+f4 - in height (we 26 measured from ground level at the center of the base to the top of the base. 27 28 MAXIMUM AREA: weedr•ed-9.4A} 1010 lei) square feet per sign with a 29 maximum area per sign face oft i) square feet. (see Appendix 30 'A'for measurement criteria). 31 32 33 4.S NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one monument sign per street frontage, excluding 34 menuboard signs, shall be allowed .1++ v , :` s a.,o)0.E.11,, on any site, unless 35 otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. 36 37 4. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from any property line. 38 39 4.8 MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: All monument sign bases shall be constructed of the 40 same masonry material as the front building facade on the same site or shall be stone or 41 brick. �� ,, 4 ,at..._fulj :.t� ° z. + .. .. . ..✓Kra. .a .r ...i 42 � oa,: a1 a !'.aa $i6a. a .ii 4.14, 43 a $ sa tt.. ..t'E .. % aae"ilk 23i .1 ittr.&n, ..0 is i:qsrAti44 1x...... ®M #®a 1 ,. .did; 45 46 j ILLUMINATION: Monument signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting 47 m .... e >.... .....ti... {. : " or a ,?"9X.H' lighting source where the light itself and 48 supporting structure are not visible from public R.O.W. 49 50 C, 51 (...„ 52 oattO � �3Y � a � . : l 50 °—RECOMMENDEDBYP&Z L:\crrYDOCSNoxrnDRAFt\SIGN\7O4\DRAFr-s.noc Draft#8—August14,1998 5g—33 Page 10 (Pe • 3 1. 4 „bse «:,., shall be appli able all a eestandin, • ,,,1,: t, ^ ^n,,,.e l , ,,let *t,:^ 5 ordinance. 6 2. LOCATIONS WHERE ALLOWED: 7 8 9 a, ate- ighway 111 l rontage: ;eestan l;,,rt mot,^n been,.,,e l ,. ^:«es 10 t,^,.:.., a ...«^ a ,., e u t t n ,..,«:n. „ r^de ,red interne.tin 11 aid—wit -• e—1 dsed—€eat (200') o€ �a ul i ate R.O.W, €or S,I , 111; 12 13another-4plestaailing-siga,—Na-f4sestatulift-siga-skall-h.-alloawed-aleser-414a44140 14 15 16 17 18 19 b. All Other Sites: • 20 ee:ie�Tea er uzaiz ve" T� er, C 7 21 22 23 24 3. AR A YTTRr rA.f HEIGHT• 1\R.,..;.,,,,.v.t,eight �;.,., 25 the sign must be a minimum of seven (7) feet above ground level except for any 26 L27 28 4. „. u, • r , _ .. t_ 30 _ square feet per face of sign. The sign may have only two faces and *. be 31 constructed parallel to each other and no more than thirty inches (30") of separation 32 33 34 5. 1.nTTRL]FU n> eTr_1.re• n.,1„ • mot,^tt be^n.,,,e l„er ,,,^t;4;e l site. 35 36 6. T,Rn rr>,Rr TTR S T1?A CK: G:ftee„/t c\ grope,«,.t:,.e. 37 38 7. MATI;DTA1• REQTUIDEMENTS: T,,e rt stuct„re fort e shall be double pole a mzi:fl:�:e, z. � espp a:.vv s�eez� :ve ve:• a""� r 39 a h n b «.. . a a i * l 1, 1, m tc1, a,e m port;,. f 40 +1, al buildin a,e •« h ll b r briar N„ s ngle pole aeesta„diAg iza g-e"a a eiee or ezzwz: ve e�e�'ve v e C o 41 ••_ • - .. •a. ro s- r a • •. Ys.,� a'•@.. r'43 i^� `. a = �r •- a a n .yR.�' a.� � �vr,art. man « 42 3 41 zrJv,� ..•... s -a.r r ;r a ] lf a w".�t.a., `rvr r` e - r s roe s� w.ry w"*» -- ^^..- -;.- .egg z .t, . ,. e z -. a+a� a :`;':: ^a 43 - -R - z•- :- .-za-s' r�3s'-.- ^g.v;•:' --Y.15 9:c z.xt:` �',,.. 5 .;Y r:a-a tf r,.-. ', � ,..s...�.,.� ���_.. , '_ *. �.ate^' � ^-�a-ka ..:' a�•.oaaa au�.,�M -+-�r-„�..,�... 44 r ,:.a 45 46 8. t,« 1.rtht: e„ta• — • : 47 • • i •• ; eternal ,bit 48 expose 49 50 9. p SI 1.TL L JACENCY: No freestandingg,,^ shall be allowed within � 51 _ -- - .. . ,):c rr c „,..„,,..,....,,,,,,,..a - - - - - - -.L 52 • .. „.. . t ..x:rw, .r m a .aaa v�t • i :Li ar a� r r ...,, 53 : ,ter 54 55 56 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFIISIGN\704\DRAFT-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 eB. -31- Page 11 (me1 D.II GROUND SIGN 2 3 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this 4 subsection shall be applicable to all ground signs. 5 6 2. LOCATION LIMITATIONS: No signs shall be placed within public right-of-way. 7 8 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: gear-feet-(41) 9 10 4. MAXIMUM AREA: Twelve-(12) square feet with a maximum of si446.) 11 ig square feet per sign face. 12 13 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS: _?.- signs per site. 14 15 SEC. 17 PROHIBITED SIGNS 16 17 A. GENERAL 18 19 Any sign which is not specifically permitted in Articles V and VI of this ordinance shall be 20 prohibited. 21 22 B. OBSCENE SIGNS 23 24 No person shall erect or be displayed upon M site a sign in 25 which the dominant theme of material taken as a whole appeals to a prurient interest in sex, or is 26 patently offensive because it affronts community standards relating to the description or 27 representation of sexual matters,and is utterly without redeeming social value. 28 29 C. OBSTRUCTING DOORS,WINDOWS,OR FIRE ESCAPES 30 31 No person shall erect or display on any site any sign which prevents free ingress to or egress from 32 any door,window,or fire escape. 33 34 D. OBSTRUCTING VISION/SIGHT TRIANGLE 35 36 No person shall erect or display on any site any sign in such a manner as to obstruct free and clear 37 vision at any location, street, intersection, or driveway. All signs placed at any intersection shall 38 prevent such problem by observing a sight triangle as provided for in Section 1,"Definitions." 39 40 E. INTERFERENCE WITH TRAFFIC 41 42 No person shall erect or display on any site any sign which interferes with vehicular or pedestrian 43 traffic as a result of the position, size, shape, movement, color, fashion, manner, or intensity of 44 illumination or any other characteristics causing such interference. Nor shall any person erect or 45 allow to be displayed any sign in such a manner as to interfere with, obstruct the view of, or be 46 confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device, including, without limitation, signs 47 making use of the words"stop," "go," "look," "slow," "danger,"or any other similar word,phrase, 48 symbol or character, or employ any red, yellow, green, or other colored lamp or light in such a 49 manner as to cause confusion or otherwise interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic. 50 51 F. PORTABLE SIGNS (se, 52 53 No person shall erect or allow-to-be displayed - any portable sign;except,however,that 54 upon a majority vote by the City Council, a conditional use permit may be issued to any non- 55 profit organization for an on-site portable sign. Permits shall be issued for one thirty (30) day 56 period with at least ninety(90)days separation between permits. L:\cilYDOC\ORD\DRAFnSIGN\704\DRAFT-8 DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 613- 5 Page 12 (go1 G. CERTAIN ILLUMINATED SIGNS 2 3 1. No sign shall be illuminated to such an intensity or in such a manner as to cause a glare 4 or brightness to a degree that it constitutes a hazard or nuisance to traffic. Moving, 5 flashing, intermittent lighted, changing color, revolving, or similarly constructed signs 6 shall not be allowed. 7 t fd ai tem .,tur i n t, nstitute lashing . easa�-ere�Tw mve Pie a ei,:fie ei�:ivy 8 9 2. No lighted sign shall be erected or displayed within one-hundred fifty (150) feet of a 10 single-family residentially zoned property unless the lighting is shielded from view of the 11 residentially zoned property and indirect light does not exceed 1/2 lumen measured from 12 any property line of the residentially zoned property. 13 14 H. SIGNS PROJECTING ON/OVER PUBLIC PROPERTY OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 15 16 It shall be prohibited to erect or a1lsw4o be displayed any type of sign on or over public right-of- 17 way (ROW) or other public property, unless the same be erected by the City, County, State or 18 other authorized governmental agency,or with the permission of the City,for public purposes. 19 20 I. ROOF SIGNS 21 22 Any sign erected on a vertical framework supported by and located immediately and entirely over 23 the roof of a building is prohibited. a �° Ai fia ,� �sd:fF,� `-�� _ irg *= 24 pro' i y The painting or otherwise affixing of signs on a roof is prohibited. 25 (we26 11 2728 a'0' s a 7i e a ,e�ai n 0 �wJ# p9U9 t�.1 af1i4 � § • fx . '. 29 0> 1," ++1,:t.) 30 31 32 33 ARTICLE V-SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS 34 35 SEC. 18 SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS 36 37 This article regulates the type of sign structure allowed for each type of sign permitted by this 38 ordinance. Each of the signs identified in this article is subject to the general sign provisions set 39 forth in Article IV except where modifications to the general regulations are noted. 40 41 SEC. 19 cPZCIFIC REGUr A Trnrrc A PP IC A RL❑ Tr7 Tel ON SI 9 o 11.' SIGNS e::fl 42 REQUIRING PERMIT 43 44 Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this article shall be applicable 45 to all of the following signs. 46 47 A. BUSINESS SIGN 48 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached ,ii monument andier-fpaastandi g 49 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: None 50 51 B. MENUBOARD SIGN (...„ 52 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached :"' monument andier—fromsamdmg 53 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 54 a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Six feet(6'). 55 LACITYDDCS\ORD\DRAFT\SIGN 7O4\DRAFr-S.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 V 8 3 .0 Page 13 (160, 1 b. MAXIMUM AREA: Twenty four (24) square feet. Only one face will be 2 allowed per sign. 3 c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: No more than two(2)signs per site. 4 d. LOCATION LIMITATIONS: All menuboard signs must be located at the side 5 or rear of the principal building. tr4C i}a,,I„ (a a, ,, rj..,44 .4e??., • -<, 6 east 11 , ee a• 7 8 G. S1 TQDWISION SIGNS 9 .• *4:41--11,!..: ,ENTRY SIGN 10 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or monument 11 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 12 a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Attached sign may not project above top of wall 13 b. MAXIMUM AREA: 14 AT «. n t, a s/Tnm a o««:«t. • „fR;f««_lSm 15feet pace, 16 Attached: Thirty-two(32)square feet 17 c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) monument sign or two attached 18 wall plaque signs(i.e.not a combination thereof)per street entrance 19 *1� iii'i1.i:,"4 ka ;l .,61,00,14 ae1sps, ,, :,ir"$teo°.f a A, es° ;'i,4 a .- 20 7.:Mi"a'3 sZ: as Tee,,.!! .'i .i'„4" Ea0,°; AOi41 4:w is t."'',4 ,, i ''ar: ai3 €.. `;a.tx'a. 21 3e�141..- +,.7'°v :'_4�.'S .'l "t ii(t?®, 22 23 ! t, g 24 , " -,0 4 ®,,:a . i afaeiO4c c26 .• :',..7it.. /.1,,1 :1,,, :ivicifii!' ,S>.'4... i.,-,A 28 a i.:',1 pe\ .$'� � Sir tx£v a ' it ,- ,Ii iil e5:"%szet^9a,:*. F ;o ie 29 _ 4r41 F .1. 4 30 (0,) ‘Ta« ii 4 161 4AT4 D '+rt+m""ga C®sar=ia,i ,a4. 4i'iroiriJi .4I', .I; 31 1 d rr e # ine ' a ie 4" o 4. ° , irr z a ."s $+l! 32 � R �� 7'*"*-*`,1 4 „ i� l,me o 4 � �• 1 4,t $f d s .;,.,, 9 a :4: ... iT a A b'1tiv' iI'I(: 34 ® .+ 4 ' ' 44 M` 4 :.9 e't•04i.,\4+q 11 1 ktii,,.al'' i 0 14(0 ®e 1.4 a ,-1 w iiaa: 35 36 -2, DIRECTORY SIGN 37 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument angler•-fr•eestanding 38 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 39 a. AA A XIM TAR HEIGHT• T.<.olye/1 2)feet 4..frey6t... ing 40AfAXDrrTAd An A• n >, a a /Tnm et •«t. b. � v evz'ieT:va 7 eT<�z� z� a <ie:: i 'TL 41 42 c. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from right-of-way 43 d. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)sign per street entrance 44 e. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Not applicable 45 f. LOCATIONS WHERE ALLOWED: Only distance measurements shall apply 46 47 .. , .;-s,,ftz. , .'1 • .' .141c J Alf.m,r 1 ,MOP kvi ,1001..., RECOMMENDED BY P&Z 48 49 � e m. h 4d i 3 .•..a c -';.(z.49);4:11 z ' ) 4 ` 50 � i '3 51 �. gggba +��aa t sa � i c52 � ,'9 °�' w3 ..`l '9�a^`aq'16," � 4 Y, b9 4, 4g1q I{B} §9'8t 6'ii D1 1 . ,, 53 \ pit:i 6, -a (a)1.,,; 3 l 1. i; „ tf,4 1.. ii,() ; 54 55 56 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTZIGN\704\DRAF[-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 Page 14 RF- 3-7 • ' ns s;iAl � w t ,ama , e ,Js s, a as i :Ti .i f s . )�a ,fia ta • r i li}4� ti ij � a• ab i�, st � l 1Yy•11_' iav 3dSo il ii' ttilit a s. �1 � Ia y vi( ati2(hip? 3 eade ••° a _.\2 a ,? a `a.'I% ° i _ sio vaa„,i % •W y4 ' •41 ais6 ace o� - Isurface'7 I'V 8 9 > � Q� '® , 3 t : 10 a(y ,a ;;'i> iamu� re �t ." i a e, a ml i � amX;< cl i ,. >l� z� i � �„ir -sr 4 nia s1 at 11 a r�iy fi s2• t# [s i� � 3mst t12 ia. as • =§} az , Teat(d aGt13 „ ' .e a �a ia• a 14 15 16 18 ° \' _.� t t° i� i > ta ga; <i sr3 a � a1 � ®®yy rm («;.$ iia i1 19 , e'1 ,t,Yai1mi3 -, - �i{ tat2120 f s22 23 25 �31=�iy1'll z . a I°9. 'Q ' 24 26 (110, 28 t ��� a� � ' :. as a 29 30 �1°�}1 #aa, �,� . ®lt�� x•T• 31 h �� tal t: "� ) , aa( 32 CIcrm a Yit � s if ai" te�}9 a e a taaa tt�.? ' i! 5 33 „apv • °,t tIY R s 4'a 2 €Ssr ®}mamma- a('j 34 35 SEC. 24 am TEMPORARY SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT 36 37 A. BANNERS oT:*n rANT AND a ru>~er rT;vc 38 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 39 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 40 a. MAXIMUM AREA: n „nd�ea !1 nm f et ( , f 41 !tea C z • S a a a tJr •aa a." " a3. a� ma a e tS$ea r a r ° 3' 42 43 b. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from right-of--way 44 c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: wave-(2) #'!t« A tet per site;-no more 45 46 d. DURATION: M f rt � !n c\ days three ti ems ca1enda. 47 5� ,ataa ,aaa 'si Nz".?. -y. fi m�'+` e a :ara ,° Yi with a sixty (60) day 48 separation between permits. 49 e. A A � ENTSa i 11 a e eers vi an ers r peiv ants m.et be atta 1.ed to the 50 51 TJ OOF T r*r> T IMIT A TTONS• 1�"0 52 • 53 a• T2 A T T(I(IT�TQ A lrn(I'i'L7T:T) 1;T!I A TTT�T(:TIT:\/Tf CQ 54 4, SS 2. T,,flITITT:T!`A'i'TlII�TC T!l(=T:T�TT;TJ AT T)T:l.TTT A'i'T(IRTQ aS tee as eL REGULATIO S: 56 a. t\R A XIM IGHT• Fif y!c!1\f et to e.,i o f tether line L:\CITYDGCS\ORD\DRAFI\SIGM704\DRAFI-B.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 ��, Page 15 • 1 b. MI M D{ S TTZ AC • f Fiee„(15)f er aom right of way 3 c GapaGity-e.±gteater-than-4140.4.1)-GmbiG-Sees4444-pff-site.--144a-Emisto-auttaber 4 5 DU1J A TION• M^ .,, F rtyas ys three times a calendar yea ,.;th 6 7 ROOF 1 INE T IMITATIONS: Not applicable e, :zvvr-n i��:: :: a::vz,v, : v.�ppe 8 9 G.M MODEL HOME SIGNS 10 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument,fteestalding,and/or ground 11 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 12 a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT 13 level a, . _; ( , ,ia,_ a- ,A; 14 b. MAXIMUM AREA: One hundred-(100) ,a r x _ + e kii74, square feet with a 15 maximum of 1 square feet per sign face 16 c. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from any property line 17 d. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)sign per builder per subdivision 18 e. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Not applicable 19 f. LOCATIONS WHERE ALLOWED: Not applicable 20 g. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Not applicable 21 22 D.M SPECIAL PURPOSE SIGNS 23 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or 14^0 R 14 • • 24 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 25 a. MAXIMUM AREA: 26 27 b. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: Four(4)total per event or occasion 28 c. PLACEMENT TIME: thitzty-(-20) �`':� � ,;' <` days before 29 30 No more than twice a year. 31 d. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Not applicable 32 e. LOCATIONS WHERE ALLOWED: Not applicable 33 f. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Not applicable 34 35 E. SEARCH LIGHTS 36 .1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUXTURE• Fre tandin ez, ez ev vz vim, z:�iee�::em`�j 37 2, MODI1ICATIONS Tn GENED AT REGTTT ATIONS: �v :v va �fl:v ev zmveaz e::ez�v. 38 s. MA ,D44tt1,r HEIGHT• IsTot applicable 39 b. MAXIMUM NT TA.IBED Olr SIGNS. Two(2)per site 40 G. DURATION: Seven (7) days, twice a ^-le^a'T year with a sixty (60) day 41 42 €1. MAT RIAT REQUIREMERTTS: Not applicable 43 44 E. CONSTRUCTION SIGNS 45 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE:llitqaument-froaastaailit;g,-aatlier-geanst d 46 2. MODIFICATIONS Tn G NED A T D EGUT A TIONS: vez� vea:raven: zvz�v. 1,�A XI rt TM NI T11 BEv nF SIGNS. One(1)„er street f one 47 a. zaa a v: ez v: v� vavT:7 per: va:�• age-per-site 48 b. Dr ro A TIOT.r a t, . It a t a . time after ate of +1,e 49 b ildi t f l development „ al of the developers 50 t f ,t t: 1 b• The s ,st be r ,ea , ., tt,e 51 L 52 ° 53 54 c. 55 d. D1rSIilE14:14AT ADJACENCY: Not applicable 56 e. LOCATIONS WHERE A T T n\1TIID: Not applicable L:ICITYDOCS1oRD\DRAFDSIGM704\DRAF[-8.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 8E, 29, Page 16 DEVELOPMENT SIGNS 2 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE:Monument€seertaadiag,and/or ground 3 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 4 Al ' t. ttigip(6 , k;A,,r4� 5 .:i Aa�..._.e 4414 3(.4IJIttiR 1� rY,` 413+: P,.41111 ibis. x)' e,p • 7 a,. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)peg street frontage per site 8 b.01 DURATION: Sign may be installed at any time after the issuance of the 9 building permit for a commercial development or approval of the developers 10 agreement for a residential subdivision. The sign must be removed �, e 11 upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a commercial 12 development and upon the issuance of a C.O. '7'11' on ninety 13 perGeat.41)41%.) 'a of the lots within the subdivision for 14 a residential subdivision. 15 G.ET MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Not applicable 16 d.'; RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Not applicable 17 s. LOCATIONS WHERE ALLOWED: Not applicable 18 19 SEC. 24.a TEMPORARY SIGNS EXEMPT FROM PERMIT 20 A permit shall not be required for the following signs: 21 22 A. SUBDIVISION MARKETING SIGNS 23 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Ground 24 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 25 a. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: 26 �y* ,4�:,.,� /moo A....e.,i:. �T2I f r�,.fihorsl,.:t •.,.) 27 tae ° $"�. ..' >ti Ii :°�$�s e y e a. ,'ait11•ta ;w < ai .` t rat'%1tr4133 aai: 28 b. LOCATION OF SIGNS: No sign may be placed closer than fifty feet (50') 29 from an intersecting R.O.W. Signs advertising the item m .,ben cloGer 30 than ten feet(10')apart 31 c. PLACEMENT TIME: 12:00 noon Friday to 12:00 noon Monday 32 ! o �� a °- . .° ;� . ..ro °.� x 1 33 s 41 , 3333,e13 4ti 444'4.4 k^43 1 34 Ot'# 0! , r- 6.'3- 1 44 444,3.4 31 4.'4'0 4) .31 telk 35 36 B. TRADESMAN . .w 3 • SIGNS 37 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Ground 38 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 39 a. DURATION: Signs may only be placed after issuance of a building permit and 40 must be removed upon 41 42 43 C. REAL ESTATE SIGNS 44 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached,monument,freestanding,and/or ground 45 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 46 a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: ' 3A t° ,6'<,, .:Tex,- r ,00.0, 41.3. ;below roof 47 line for attached 48 b. MAXIMUM AREA: Fifty(50) a 14. i-,° square feet 49 c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) sig&-fer—evietzfrfiv4--(4-aGpes 50 51 L52 D. WINDOW SIGNS 53 Window signs _ not obscure more than€1 -percent 54 (.50%) a <, of the total window area „� + ;,z 3 •. 3,3. 55 .3,_. . No illuminated window signs shall 56 be allowed within two feet of the window glazing except for open/closed signs. L:\CrrYDOCS\ORD'DRAFnSIGN\704\DRAFr-S.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 �4 0 Page 17 • L1 E. GARAGE/YARD SALE SIGNS 2 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Ground 3 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 4 a. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: 4) '',,,(4113 per sale; 5 i it A13; a'� aa, .y,t, 6 b. PLACEMENT TIME: 12:00 noon Friday to 12:00 noon Monday or on any 7 legal holiday, a(4)t A =; f!',„4%` 8 [Issue risen after P&Z Public Hearing: This language would allow each sale within a subdivision to place 9 two(2)signs. Also, this regulation would preclude residences not in a subdivision from placing signs.] 10 11 SEC. 22 SPECIFIC REGTdI.ATIONS APPLICABLE E TO- F SITE SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT 12 13 A. OFF SITE DRVET OPMMT.TT SIGNS : :sz■z e:v:�v 14 1. PEPJ4ITTED SIGN STRU Tf RZ; Arlon. t f eestanding o :-nra+ria-rDzrez vz� e zzev v z v m, :ze:zaT:iiz�zz z�e��am 15 2. NIGI TRTC A TIN Tn GRT�TRD A T D EGT TT A TTONQ :v va v:v:zazmevv:::: z�v 16 a. M A YT1�.lT TTR HR GWI': Fiftee,. I1 5)f et f freest.,..ding 17 b. M A YIA,IT T>\r A t?R A. One hundred (1 nm e F et witt, m_of frty 18 19 c. 20 21 d. MAXIMUMluB nR SIGNS. One (T)per s„bdivision pl„s an additional 22 23 e. REQUsDmD DmMOV7 AT , AlT vf eit e a„bdiicarer eiR ,st be e + r" 24 t t, eat bull a ety „e ce o 25 wised, 26 27 28 ARTICLE VI-EXEMPTIONS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 30 SEC. 23 EXEMPT SIGNS 31 The following signs are exempted from the requirements of this ordinance: 32 33 1. Signs on Tehicles ;sue:s unless the sign is used or intended to be used as an on- 34 site or off-site sign. It shall be prima facie evidence that a sign is used as an on-site or 35 off-site sign if a vehicle is parked at the same location for a continuous period exceeding 36 seventy-two (72) hours. No person shall attach any sign to a trailer, skid, or similar 37 mobile structure, where the primary use of such structure is to provide a base for such 38 sign or to constitute the sign itself. This provision shall not be interpreted to prohibit 39 identification signs on vehicles used for business purposes, a ;f:.-1117.1� 3== z " 40 i, 41 42 2. Warning .itri security 34,0 and directional s f r...long et,. 43 44 3. Government signs and signs for non-profit organizations sponsored by government 45 including flags, insignia, legal notices, informational, directional, and traffic signs 42! 46 l' 1I a "!���t..>� .'as$na. A�3d�=t t.:;b, ; 414 zs a s ' 4144T,W( a,..,9 4,1.- 47 48 4. "No Dumping"and"No Trespassing"signs. 49 50 5. All signs not visible from off the site. 51 L52 6. Signs in public parks placed inside ballfield fencing by the City, which are intended for 53 advertising to raise funds for recreation programs which have copy on only one face with 54 the copy facing toward the interior of the field. 55 56 7. Political signs not within public right-of-way , s a. L:\CI77DOCS\ORD\DRAF\SIGW\7O4\DRAFr-B.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 PR-4l Page 18 • 1 SEC.24 NONCONFORMING EXISTING SIGNS 2 3 All signs that are lawfully in existence on the date of adoption of this ordinance may exist in their 4 present form,but no such signs shall be altered or moved unless a permit is issued pursuant to the 5 provisions of this ordinance. Permits granted prior to the passage of this ordinance shall be 6 renewed only if the applicant complies with all provisions of this ordinance. 7 8 Any legal, non-conforming sign which has been substantially destroyed or dismantled for any 9 purpose other than maintenance shall be deemed as completely destroyed if the cost of repairing 10 the sign is more than 60%of the cost of erecting a new sign of the same type at the same location. 11 Under this provision,the sign shall be removed and a permit shall be required to erect a new sign. 12 13 SEC.25 SIGN COPY 14 15 Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, any sign authorized in this ordinance 16 is allowed to contain non-commercial(ideological)copy in lieu of any other copy. 17 18 SEC.26 APPENDICES 19 20 It is anticipated that the following appendices will be changed periodically by the Building 21 Official in response to changes in the administration of this ordinance. 22 (se L:\C1T DOGS ORJ DRAF SIGN\7onnnAFt-s.DOC Draft#8—August14,1998 C� — p`— Page 19 APPENDIX 'A' (4,„, METHODS OF AREA MEASUREMENT • ATTACHED SIGNS EXHIBIT A-1 12' I 6' I 12' SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 2' HEIGHT: Letter height-12" 24"- 0I"' , , AREA: 18 s.f. (3'x 6') — NOTES: Area limited to 0.75 square feet for 14 every one foot of width of building or lease MIME space not toexceed 400square feet;signs 8' EIEE shall be limited in widthh to the middle seventy five percent(75%)of the width of any building or lease space or single plane facade. 30' L 40' 75%75% I 6'-6" 7'-6" [ 6'— -2'6" 15' I z-6" EXHIBIT A-2r )1 . ` SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 2' io' '-" Sign Wave i S G N ERE ... ??' 10111111 HEIGHT: Letter height- 10"&12" I AREA: 15 s.f.& 15 s.f. NOTES: Area limited to 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease III III space not to exceed 400 square feet;signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent(75%)of the width of any building or lease space or single plane facade. 20' 20' C L;\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFI\SIGM704WPPNDIX.VSD Draft#8-August 14,1998 65 4 3 Page 20 • APPENDIX 'A' (...., METHODS OF AREA MEASUREMENT MONUMENT SIGNS EXHIBIT A-3 SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument-attached lettering 12.5' 75% HEIGHT: 4' 3.25' 9' 3.25' SIGN FACE AREA: 50 s.f. (4'x 12.5') NOTES: The sign structure must be constructed or covered with the same masonry material as the 4' 7s% 3 SIGN principal building,or stone,or brick. All sign text I L - and graphic elements shall be limited horizontally 6° and vertically to the middle seventy-five percent (75%)of the sign face. Sign may be illuminated utilizing a ground lighting source,where the light itself and supporting structure may not be visible from public R.O.W. EXHIBIT A-4 10' SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument-sculpted —1'-6" I 7' 11'-6"— aluminum panel 6L „ -- _ HEIGHT: 4' AREA: 10 s.f. (4'x 10') 3' 4'-6" SIGN NOTES: The sign base and/or structure must be 5 constructed or covered with the same masonry material as the principal building,or stone,or brick. 6" All sign text and graphic elements shall be limited x --- ---- — horizontally and vertically to the middle seventy-five percent(75%)of the sign face. Sculpted aluminum sloped ground sign panels may be illuminated utilizing internal lighting. EXHIBIT A-5 SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument-masonry panel 12' HEIGHT: 4' 75% -1'-6" I. 9' ; 1'-6"— SIGN FACE AREA: 48 s.f. (4'x 12') 6" pp ill i'l ",iiiiii:�r(}hilt" 11[ ulli (l !{(I IIC (l,?, NOTES: The sign base and/or structure must be III constructed or covered with the same masonry 4' 75% 3' ;II, , LOGO material as the principal building,or stone,or brick. 11 All sign text and graphic elements shall be limited ill` horizontally and vertically to the middle seventy-five percent(75%)of the sign face. Sign may beL 1' illuminated utilizing a ground lighting source,whereI the light itself and supporting structure may not be visible from public R.O.W. [,;WrrYDGCSWRD\DRAFRSIGNV044►PPNDDGVSD Draft#8-August 14,1998 8.5-44 Page 21 • APPENDIX 'A' METHODS OF AREA MEASUREMENT FREESTANDING SIGNS Recommended prohibition 10' -1'4 8' 11' EXHIBIT A-6 SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding 10 8' SignHEIGHT: 17' AREA: 64 s.f. (8'x 8') I NOTES: Supporting structure must be constructed or covered with the same masonry material as the principal building on the site, stone or brick. Sign requires a border around 7, the entire perimeter of the sign at a minumum width of one-eighth(1/8)the height of the sign face,to be constructed of the same masonry material as the principal building,or stone,or brick. 8' EXHIBIT A-7 -1' 6' 1.- SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding 1' HEIGHT: 20'(at centerline) SIGNS AREA: 36 s.f. (6'x 6') SIGNS 6' 8' NOTES: Supporting structure must be 20'18 SIGNS constructed or covered with the same masonry 22' material as the principal building on the site, 1' stone or brick. Sign requires a border around the entire perimeter of the sign at a minumum width of one-eighth(1/8)the height of the sign face,to be constructed of the same masonry material as the principal building,or stone,or brick. sloped ground C tAcmrnocs\oamoa nstcrmas\ApPrmtxvsn Draft#8-August 14,1998 g"." 4S Page 22 APPENDIX 'A' (....„ METHODS OF AREA MEASUREMENT FREESTANDING AND GROUND SIGNS Freestanding - Recommended Prohibition 8' EXHIBIT A-8 SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding �,t HEIGHT: 17' 4' ' ' SIG N 8' ,t t 10' AREA: 48 s.f. 8'x 6') '' >>I;,. ( r ,' SIGN NOTES: Supporting structure must be SIGN constructed or covered with the same masonry 1- i material as the principal building on the site, — r,;` '— stone or brick. Sign requires a border around the entire perimeter of the sign at a minumum 1' ! , width of one-eighth(1/8)the height of the sign 3''l'} T (Ilare face,to be constructed of the same masonry "' 1 material as the principal g rinci al building,or stone,or I, i� brick. ,, '"sl`' 3' EXHIBIT A-9 SIGN STRUCTURE: Ground Sign 2' 3' HEIGHT: 3' I I 1' AREA: 6 s.f. (2'x 3') Le' L.ICITYDOCSWRDORAFIlSIGNV04 APPNDIX.VSD Draft#8-August 14,1998 Re p Page 23 APPENDIX 'B' (....., SELECTED GRAPHIC CLARIFICATIONS Sections 16.A.2 and 16.A.4-For any lease space which does not front on a street,the maximum letter/logo height shall be based on the distance from the vehicular driveway access. Only one attached sign per street frontage shall be allowed on any site along said street frontage,unless otherwise specifically provided. A secondary sign may be permitted at a public entrance, provided the entrance is on another side of the building, but shall be limited to twenty-five percent(25%)of the primary or permitted sign size,whichever is more restrictive. The six(6)inch minimum letter/logo height will not apply to these secondary signs. No more than two(2)attached signs shall be allowed per lease space. Drive Parking 120' 18"letter/logo 18" letter/logo 15"letter/logo — 12" lease lease lease space letter/ space space logo public entrance public entrance secondary ign secondary sign 4.5"letter/logo 3.75"letter/logo L Parking Section 16.A.5 -Attached sign area limited to 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet; signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent(75%)of the width of any building or lease space or single plane facade. 75% —75°A,—• —75%— • \mil \ • 24" SINE & SONS SUBS...12" .... SIGNS SIGN:::: 24" CITY (6,...- N LACITYDOCS ORDDDRAMSIGM7oAAPPNDDCVSD Draft#8-August 14,1998 —¢7 Page 24 APPENDIX 'B' SELECTED GRAPHIC CLARIFICATIONS Section 16.A.6- Signs shall be no closer vertically to the eave of the roofline or overhang than the permitted letter height. 111111 ———— 24" 111 111111 24 1 �. . 111111 —— 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 IIIIII 'mil Illlll IIIIII 111111 Section 16.A.6 -Signs may be attached to a continuous plane fascia provided the sign does not extend above or below the projection of the fascia. Such signs are only allowed when attached to structural canopy supported to the ground by columns constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure. � x Sign —� Column —♦ L:\CITYDOCS ORD\DRAFRSIGN\7O4\APPNDIX.VSD Draft#8-August 14, 1998 —483 Page 25 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT August 14, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-073 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-286/First Reading/ Rezoning- SheltonWood STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner,481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator,481-5581,ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as Tracts lA and 1CIA situated in the Joel W. Chivers Survey,Abstract No. 350, and Tract 2B1 situated in the James L. Chivers Survey,Abstract No. 348, and being approximately 24.225 acres. LOCATION: North side of East Dove Street approximately 125'east of Ridgecrest Drive. OWNERS: Charles and Elaine Bell, and John Shelton APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG"Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential and 65 LDN Overlay Corridor NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty-seven(27) RESPONSES: Two (2)responses were received within the 200'notification area: • Gaylon Bailey, 465 East Dove Road, Southlake, Texas, in favor. (Received 7/16/98) • John M. Shelton, 570 East Dove Road, Southlake, Texas,in favor. (Received 7/23/98) P&Z ACTION: July 23, 1998; Approved (6-0). COUNCIL ACTION: August 4, 1998; Approved (6-0) applicant's request to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the August 18, 1998, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-073Z.W PD , III PIR OP Alps • . _••.:::.t.„ fti'.-- 111 .11VJill.I ! 1 , It rek' a . A1 1.11111M li7= 1 \ , EIPIIRIMI Wm' wilmr \I ._, ...rim 'io vox / ! ! 14) 2 tovigri el .1111110.., • ,. 1 li Mill . ; I i 1 T ica-GPIt. s gock 1 J I i z51;k1f- I 111101 \ , t t ' . 1 k li LIS . 2"1 - ; (7 11111.2"1111111M:Vrt riii.4. Llik Mil i w. al . •64. glir Ill 1 Err I..11. { I I keicke7 iiril SOCOL h ! 1.7— 1 4.1 i 1111101.17(00 N I -4i:, 00)6) i • ! 1- -,....L1 EsItk-W- crir Torrir — --.• mil giD. .... T 11 1 1 i 1 1 1 000 -- - ', ucred , 1 ; FRIAZEi 1 I Li • \ j I i.:•-----1 1 I 1 . ,...._. I I TRACT MAP co, /`-io_. I i Sa'7- I 1-------A cy, �G� ��\ _ / me • m c 1 r w • I w w I Et 1M. BONACCI W d V V) d t U.c 7,....._____VI 0 'PC _S el0WI ., my N vr ^ Z 0T ^ n o INcI- B. ADAMSON '" II c" Q Z g cc : a O u+ , . N LL J. WILLIAMS w J. GILLILAND Q r V Z C!) c • = QQ - N _ N W cc cc (} : Q W = W. BURTON Q Q J _ _ ,s, ws \ 1 1 wXo aZ.; o '= wrQ rs 1 II ZOQm U 1!uou j_ D i U cc cri 2O ` 1 �Z W cn <W I •.tr � c, IA �O 0Q ? / a —~ O 1-_ t W� CC M a > Z -r :_ SALYER &ASSOC. 9ccLL ¢ Z N o CC ! 8 dA 0c Cr......._ (-- niA£ Q. �6li1 Lu 3 7 c„) a.t f \--ra. ‘ >- < I- 1 0 < Cf:10 --/- 'D Y . . Cr ^ ov _< WJ 4 = 0 • • LI I LL .O • ^ ¢ co ^ OsIU WCn aQA=t • = ~ < al. s J 2 :,. �, cE Cr) 9r se-3 I s Q¢ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 4 g4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS III JOEIW CHIVERS. P . AND 2B SITE SURVEY - ABSTRAt ENO 48 B i. G .att.,-C,n, r�ku.,w-�.",,:- wra'e�=, an- �a� +va"eti,.,. APPROXIMATELY 24 225 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM '". AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF IA' SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS (re ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and G:\ORD\ZONING\480.286 Page 1 �c-" LWHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout -this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly Li requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City G:\ORD\ZONING\480.286 Page 2 of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tracts 1 A and 1 C 1 A situated in the Joel W.Chivas Survey,Abstract No 350, and Tract 2B1 situated in the James L. Chrvers Survey,Abstract No 348 and being approximately 24225 acres,and more fully and completely described in exhibit "A" from"AG"Agricultural District to "SF lA',Burgle Family Residential District,; Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a c„, violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:\ORD\ZONING\480.286 Page 3 thir' Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G:\ORD\ZONING\480.286 Page 4 Q/f C APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.286 Page 5 Se-8 EXHIBIT "A" L, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BEING a tract or parcel of land situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being out of the Joel W. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 350, and also being all of that tract of land conveyed to John M. Shelton and Bobbie Jeanne Shelton by deeds recorded in Volume 4400, Pages 846 and 850, Deed Records, Tarrant County. Texas; and also being a portion of that tract of land conveyed to Charles Frank Bell Jr. and Elaine Shaw Bell by deeds recorded in Volume 4558, Page 153, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner and being the northeast corner of Oakwood Pond, an addition tc the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 2362, Plat Records, Tarran` County, Texas; THENCE North 86'57'26" East, 287.06 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 00'07'55" East, 12.26 feet to a 1/2 THENCE North 87'06'37" East, 378.63 feet to a 3 inch pipe fence rod osfound .for corner; und fTHENCE South 01'37'54" West, 229.80 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rodt found for ccorner; orner; THENCE North 83'33'09" East, 356.10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 01'03'09" West, 464.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 83'10'17" West, 340.92 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 01'05'20" West, 133.31' feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE North 89'17'24" West, 175.42 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE North 89'17'24" West,THENCE South 00'42'36" West, 225.89 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; 43.50 feet 50 feet to to aa 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 04'53'46" West. 2 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE North 81'53'23" West, 193.69 feet to a 11/2 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE North 07'16'13" East, 79.43 feet to a 1/2 THENCE North 81'20'31" West. 266.59 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE North 89'27'20" West,THENCE South 01'05'50" West, 333.58 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; 159.40 feet iron THENCE North O'43'19" Est. 86 05fet to to 3 inch iron hfence postod found for corner; THENCE North 88'23'15" East, 163.41 feet to a 3 inch iron fence found for corner; post found for corner; THENCE North 00'16'58" West. 386.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing some 21.473 acres of land, more or less. L G:\ORD\ZONING\480.286 Page 6 se-q City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT August 14, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-086 PROJECT: Plat Revision - Lots 17R through 27R. and Lot 28R (Common Green 45), Block 42, Timarron Addition - Crescent Royale STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 17R through 27R, and Lot 28R (Common Green 45), Block 42, Timarron Addition - Crescent Royale,being a revision of Lots 17 through 27,and Lot 28 (Common Green 45), Block 42, Timarron Addition - Crescent Royale, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 2626 and 2627, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.075 acres. LOCATION: South side of the intersection of Queensbury Turn and Regency Crossing in Crescent Royale OWNER/APPLICANT: Westerra- Timarron, L.P. CURRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development District LAND USE CATEGORY: 100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Three (3) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: August 6, 1998;Approved(6-0)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated July 31, 1998, adding Item#13 stating: This plat should not be filed until the final approval of the Letter of Map Revision by FEMA. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is the Revised Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated August 14, 1998. L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-086PR.W PD L 50- I . th,_• itil I I c.).- '$°'•• ;," 1 • 1_ t t E \ I 1 11 a L-T4— an -..-AIVII. \141 VAIVre4 fires..00, .0 1...010.. .e1A111111 PI •- IL . • !gl WA , •"--.404-iti, awl "prim — '*- iptiii.10 L, ....•04, Ik‹,..!le.im Niptae.... owil 1111111111W& 1111.111116P 4 1111 .ffir•-,,' -- ...„ ell_mgroamill _...., , ,_ 1 4 "- ' •-:k91 -, 1 OPIL. 1.-....... •• 1 1 1 ‘/ b.: a. . . [ 1 ,-e , —1,, ml .1- ' isIIILVIIIM 7'0\ I 1 Peri Imm Tokr-171 W wIrZall Ili_ I , ' I I gl.;,.. II. MN : >4411I 1 I limgriba °Valk .A. ---. ... lallicIPS 111#1.141 11, 0W — AMENarrik i. -aswpwr...,.. araw, • bt, ,tr,m44 0 *ow 1 imioroma ow- 'lama. „/ •••„-....- , ,,-APE, r bar iirt,* • • - - • 11;.krili IMAM i,;,_ , . VUNIMO PV 1 1 [ le • -'..". O##, - - '• # Allithx,*#_ wa g,* rillm--111. ( #WFW,Wilki7-0,- #' *0444,-* '- ..... -cog6w, 6 ift•.46,* v-qp t_. giwr. ,, VALW*4 " 0 .----; • • % • 4 Gas ti \ A. ,, . Il12. 1, ) 1 110, Vekti P - -. / \ . imr.,. iff"' - ::' 44`;'• ;74 \ 'S.',;._,*•,„&* . • / F2 7 X--. ‘ (-' *1 • tll _____, \ o : , :- , C \ 0,1,511:'• „,,,, 44 , 46.AAt ag‘ ,,,, ------- ,-__./ }k° , , -- \./ cf‘ -I- 4 < \cc\ evision - 4/29/97 ._ .,. .A,„_...„.„,...., ....„,„,...„,_ - - -• -•.-_„..... .. L. TRACT MAP D-2-- - • 1I goo1 / /' �. 7 re 11 • I C 1 ••1 t (00100., ret !I ... 1-• . .s.A ,a O CR ✓1 0 + 0 /rj' 1 Cn s---] LI 0,0 \ % i L-Niii Z I �'._.. ii°' WESTER RA TIMARRON' NI Cf) I 12 ckS 1 91 ,r A CI_ 1I i T., - Z <*i -. t. I 1 (in re \ LV r; t0 66 ��ss ` Z Z �+ e 6y'a o — co t '7,p '...Aillgi V\ ° 6 � . I �—` n��s� WW1A B. w WQ .., . A • ., . % i 7f. s, ,, ipp.....mioi II la 0 N c-_- _,.. -.) ,, 4Ir ,e0 • � � I o Gaa �.to ebf = 1 Mirr 0 u -_-,1_.t ,Hor '#.N' ., - ' /1;, n - it 2,!):epv, i., = g Air # • CI, :,, .!y4:5,.\>> . AdIPAPP-- ' •0'10, �i. *9ir v 44 O 1 ,`� aI Mr'pIron , / 4' (Pi, • ' cl GQ- . ,., n SO CS) ;o 1*lic v ? CC/`�' / so • sJ,_ _ ep,3 - - - - - - — {' r "T:',nra.nw1• u'�n nr1 uv ?5N_,„ d 8 Y c a 3 0 1 ,,$ 7$ Ea 7x: • aln ri:en'1' w ri P4 �1 1, .% : -? .R [ " -, ' , . g • ' 1 a ,!,-v.. 5 8 sr:, :, tf,-; c . A A ;i:3 o e 25l 5,",. =a a a.a 3; „f , I •,, A._ I c--.. N ,,,. ,, . :„,.. i ry ai.3 _ ___ ___ Witten:_ QFiS ; 4 d111 ...1 I' :zlf4 v w G 7� [ • '� ,W1 e ' i u e a aggs_� : • sa :a �t ` - I I tie ; Ny • a h rig 'F� y��$yyay yy I �I ' '}` $ 4 "1• Mai i �f :: A 0`;itAW? p• j' '-'a1 '/r• Ifbi 41i F a����'�o�i k i[oy �3 a r • •• t 1•- 41 4/0101t i . • • , . ., ..,.. I 1!! k/lti. , , RI ,I ppt. 1 { � I • -.• • iI �}. ` ; . ' JI 1-,t ....:.- ..., 4%5,04* ,., !--iiia,2 • '. , • , ,..;t: . .. .'. ' Tclin- .. 11113t4 '( i IN 7 a . rl�rl J[ee .11J cz.F.xxx:t»F <.•.x L._ .1. Z •.•:';A*',,,, _.`wws "'. i-"•__:da6S'IA::T; '' ,•` 1 Cr=S : - Q 7 4i h.; ; ,-; , ..--.,,i; li,,,, 7 ,, a I'I / ;y + �< • • f ss rrf ! I rr xi; 'J• • •ff �j l 4)l� 1 •, 1 • 111• 1 t - d YYY. 5;gi • i'�Ye• a • 4= i i, ', �, 1 ^ , k o , ` ., f , `f ,f g d I.. I I I i� �1�g� - ,op,- ^^� aw r� 1: I i• e :'';31 • r `j� �ai �I �jirs I �;'�� L..L °fie! S S I 1': `4-�,' .. ' i ie� --Hill9i,;; --•1_' I •;- -, �'1 >, d hi a111 -i 1'7%Qi Y i1 air 4, ■1• f.'a /1 -¢ 1 _ ;1f.i�9�*i � 3E!� ':'':.? ::: :.iiiiirgelpft'it:sitiz: AA is ♦ f • $ :7 < : 5,1,..‘,4:‘:,..iir_::...111.: . 8 ka'` 4.'3 \ 12 ^i 4� c '` ei-' ASS f;,.../ / .' r ~`,.. ;FEB 6 Li. iPaitl 1::::::::::::::::11 i:' e c � 1! . 1,• iP^ >. I Iiiiiiiiiiiih; !I i '2-. r ` • `°: re x, l e ., r<f, ., "I1 ;:•E : 1 :::::::l lFI. :::::: '!'IIo"I' "hhhhh't ;: 1• : iiii- �ruw {!�G �m !!!'!!7• SAY ,411 a ! M I'll �3a � 939 �83�9 � � �y v ---era-s-1,-_ 1 • City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: -ZA 98 086 Revised Review No: One Date of Review: 08/14/98 Project Name: Plat Revision. Lots 17R thru 27R Block 42 and Common Green 45. Timarron Addition Crescent Royale,a revision of Lots 17 thru 27 and Common Green 42.Block 42.Timarron Addition Crescent Royale. being 3.075 acres out of the M.W. Davenport Survey. Abstract No. 432 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Westerra Timarron. L.P. Carter& Burgess. Inc. 7605 Virginia Parkway 7950 Elmbrook Drive. Suite 250 McKinney. TX 75070 Dallas, TX 75247 Phone: (817) 481-0135 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (817) 424-9740 Attn: Steve Yetts Fax: (214)638-0447 Attn: Richard Payne CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/13/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION/PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT 1817)481-5581,EXT. 880. 1. Place the City case number"ZA 98-086" in the lower right-hand corner of the plat. 2. To improve readability, change the scale of the graphic to 1"= 50'. LK. Revise the title block as follows: a. Remove the reference to "An Amendment to Lots 17 Thru 27" and replace with the words, "A Revision of Lots 17 Thru 27". b. Revise the courthouse filing note to provide an entry for the filing date as follows: "Filed in Cabinet , Slide , Date 4. Provide the address for Bryan R. Burke and Wife Enice I. Burke. 5. In the legal description(s), include "Common Green 45" into the preamble(s) as appropriate. 6. The following changes are needed in the owner's dedication and notary: a. Note the position within the corporation of Frank Ritz. Within the notary statement for Ritz Properties, add the words "and as the act and deed of said corporation" after "and in the capacity therein stated." b. Within the Burke dedication statement, Line 2, change the word "does" to the plural "do". C L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\RSV\98\98086P1R.WPD Page 1 /] City of Southlake,Texas 7. Add a lienholder statement and signature block with a notary to the plat. If there is/are no lienholder(s) then add a statement to this effect. The standard language for these statements is attached. 8. Label the property adjacent to the south side of this development as "Timarron Golf Course Block 1, Lot 2, Cab A, Slide 2986" to show that this is a platted lot. Remove the ownership and deed information. 9. The following changes are required on the graphic: a. Remove the 5' side building line from the west side of Lot 27R. b. Clarify the relationship between the plat revision note, above the title block, and the graphic. The language of the note combined with the graphic does not provide a clear representation of the modifications to easements being requested. Modify the labeling, shading or the note as needed. c. Remove the diamond-shaped symbol within Queensberry Turn indicating that a street name change is taking place. 10. Confirm that existing structures are adequately off-set per zoning district setback regulations from the proposed lot lines. Provide a separate survey or dimensioned exhibit showing the location of any such structures. Construction is currently under way on Lots 17R, 18R, 26R and 27R. 1. The following changes are required with regard to notes on the plat: a. Add the following note to the plat: The following note applies ONLY to Lots 17R thru 27R of Block 42. The City of Southlake shall NOT be liable for any claims, damages, or losses which may occur on account of flooding or inundation of any such lots so reclaimed, and the owner and subsequent owners of any such lots agree to release the City from any and all such claims, damages, and losses. b. Delete the Developer's Note#4 regarding the removal of existing structures. 12. The following changes are needed with regard to easements: a. Show and label the type, size and deed record of all existing easements on the property. b. Provide easements for water,sewer and/or drainage in compliance with approved construction plans. c. Provide dimensional ties along lot lines to all easements. Specifically,provide a tie from the variable width D.E. along the northeast line of Lot 17R to the nearest lot corner. L:\COMDRV\WP-PILES\REV\98\98086P1R.WPD Page 2 i City of Southlake,Texas d. Show and label any easements to be abandoned(No. 483-3.07-C), if any. Specifically, show and label the existing 15' D.E. along the east side of Lot 18R and the existing variable width D.E. within Lot 27R. If these easements are being abandoned label them as such on the graphic. e. Clarify the type of easement shown as 15' in width running along the south side of Lots 17R thru 23R and deflecting diagonally across Lots 24R, 25R, and 26R. If this easement has been abandoned label it as such with the filing information for the abandonment(Vol. & Pg.). * Although the lots shown meet the minimum area criteria, staff is concerned about the sufficiency of the buildable area of Lots 24R and 25R if the above easement is existing. 13. This plat shall not be filed until the final approval of the Letter of Map Revision by FEMA. Ensure the plat correctly reflects the approved Letter of Map Revision. * A"Certificate of Taxes Paid"from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original signatures. * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 08/10/98. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Denotes Informational Comment enc: Standard Lienholder Statement cc: Westerra Timarron, L.P. VIA FAX ABOVE Carter& Burgess, Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE Ritz Properties VIA FAX(817) 488-3537 Attn: Frank Ritz Bryan Burke VIA Mail C L:\COMDEV\WP-PILES\REV\98\98086P1R.WPD j�'�) Page 3 a 4. 31YAO41 IN3OS3lI3 NOLLWOY NOtltlV1111 LY 1d OIGN31IY s.sOil! Sr 111 Y p p Y n W .-I !j i !e Z J Y » `�� 1 •n tiC' i CO ls Ii/IT s �1! m so ho gza l} 4 a 1 1[61141 1 ia II t 6i `aOtt ` =iC6 300 .;gg FS,•Mao Ei 4 .4 i by _�l 6 V;�° .`�a ^o •�d 8 J DOT d e A (!Y . a t Y R i f �1 1::di R 1 r : 0< ,1 b la Iic. ,;-- —� i4 E i hi, r 1,01• I II i sj ` igii: . i g . I■a I ir:!1 els PI lir 41 II illte i114e; �ol..E illeii s ° 1 7fyl� t Y��((1� i iI Ili f /Rsrit ��iii; r I�s.( Il as yii 1f rat 1 lidbfI:i, h i1 MI i i ' PtilEff!1 !ill jie iR' h. h1liuifl 1t ei 1 ffhi' 1s� ` t .c., ! !1L 1 !; iJII hIfI '! !1 r s gs . �t .r 1 �j: t {t • �s` ! 1 !• 1 �t sr}v1 i.1 �e 1ei 1 i e ri r qr y�ed ; e g� " 4 In .lr d t,i 1 1$1° 1 iiri i f 1 ril :f 1 i;i1 1�11e @R� ; i B$ :� ; R I1:11iir 1 j it's sCie� ��is '+t!s i 6 9 (1.i s s e't ds i i.'t Er 11. ss�'i ill C . hs yJ{g R fi 7 ii_ !s7 r f.�7 7 7f!it ltt i1 liar t Mgt s 1f gib i 1 7 . . 5- : 2 :: : : a iF �l r_ 4 5 1I i v:r" RI i e '_ /sue m q�o- • a` 4 \-fie=,r-. +s5. , 2 } ' ,,, .� Ve- ` k `. p,l 19i - .1 � .i '4 it w• ..w % I f 3� / a . ..yam �i 4 e :'19.11,101 ���,.„15 1�ir 4 rY� i`Y 'tp it•�1� ...._..._ ril�rrirlrrl ..uiii I I.[ t if i � !;! I t ilitIliR 1' IiLiL Ii�■NY r�� City of Southlake.Texas MEMORANDU M August 12, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-57,Appointment to the Parks and Recreation Board Resolution No. 98-57 allows for the appointment of a member to the Parks and Recreation Board to fill the unexpired term of Doug Fierce. His term will expire in May 1999. Mr. Fierce resigned from the Parks and Recreation Board to move his family to the Beaumont area in May. I have attached for your review, the applications I had on file, as well as the newer applications received since Mr. Fierce's resignation. Also enclosed is the latest Parks and Recreation Board list. If I can be of help,please give me a call. Please place Resolution No. 98-57 on the agenda for the August 18, 1998 City Council meeting. /sl/lc Attachments: Resolution No. 98-57 Letter of resignation from Mr. Fierce Parks & Recreation Board member list Applications from - Larry Abernathy Elaine Cox Chris Gonser Jeff Kaylor Amy Radford-Klapp Tad Stephens Lisa Stokdyk M:\WP-FILES\MEMOS\Parkappnt.doc (se 9A-1 o- y " RESOLUTION NO.98-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Parks and Recreation Board was created for the purpose of planning and developing parks and park sites within the City of Southlake, for the use and benefit of its citizens;and, WHEREAS,the Parks and Recreation Board shall consist of nine(9)members to serve three year terms;and, WHEREAS, currently a vacancy exists on the board since the resignation of Doug Fierce, leaving and unexpired term which will expire in May, 1999;now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,THAT: Section 1. All of the above findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City Council hereby appoints • as a member of the Park and Recreation Board to fill the unexpired term of Doug Fierce, with a term to expire in May, 1999. Section 3. This resolution is effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1998. BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary M:\WP-FILES\RESOLUTI\RES-98-43.doc 9A-2 C -a) 5 T JUN 16 i5e8 ..Mil THE HONORABLE RICK STACY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE OFFICE OF CITY 1725 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. SECRETARY SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 DEAR RICK, REGRETFULLY, I MUST RESIGN MY POSITION AS A MEMBER OF THE SOUTHLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD. I HAVE TAKEN A BRANCH MANAGER'S POSITION WITHIN MY COMPANY, WHICH WILL REQUIRE THAT I MOVE TO BEAUMONT, TEXAS. I COUNT THE TIME SPENT SERVING WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY AS A GREAT PRIVILEGE. I AM CONFIDENT THAT THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE WILL CONTINUE TO GROW INTO THE PREMIER COMMUNITY WE ALL HAVE ENVISIONED. RESPEC • DOUGLAS E. FIERCE cc. Southlake City Council Southlake Park Board Curtis Hawk Kevin Hugman Shana Yelverton • City of Southlake,Texas PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD Established by Ordinance No.309 Members Term to Expire Vicki Johnson, Chairman Home: 488-6195 5/99 1208 Timber Court Southlake, Texas 76092 James Glover Home: 488-6590 5/2001 1355 N. Peytonville Avenue Work: 421-5574 Southlake,Texas 76092 Richard Anderson 481-5581,ext. 703 or 704 5/2000 do City of Southlake City Secretary's Office 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Robin Jones Home: 481-2610 5/2001 516 Fox Glenn Southlake, Texas 76092 LiChris Miltenberger Home: 424-3930 5/2000 1401 Exeter Court Southlake, Texas 76092 Cara O. White, Secretary Home: 430-3058 5/99 4475 Homestead Drive Roanoke, Texas 76262 Bobby Rawls Home: 329-5486 5/99 165 E. Dove Road Southlake, Texas 76092 Sherry Berman, Vice Chairman Home: 329-2970 5/2001 818 Parkdale Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 Vacant Home: 5/99 Updated 7/98 D:\WP-FILES\LISTS\P&R98PUB.WPD (ire City of Southlake APPLICATION - , _. .:_. Njuthlcak-- FOR APPO r, � . .. APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (kr L. r • I, c i 2 0 1998* , (name of board, commission or conmiftyITY *Use a separate application for each appointment desired Name: L. CLs• e• y kill tvhdt` Address: 4 4 0 `T'f a t L e vt (T r*. Home Phone: 4 St - 37 S" 9 Years in City: S' - Employer. A v"tr i s.e,„ 114 i c %:yn•a,s Phone: IMNOP Current and/or previous board, commission,or committee experience the City of Southlake: M......s., p...•/.... 17 1.1.I NIry amar, ��R e.�„�.fr.*• s.,,inteke c..�.�..e P1..r�...,�,:,�� w..1 Ai..,... Dal., clAs • D,..l.. F 1.•k4 e:1rica to.....•...� •� ��. P��Ysre�� �trwi lam_ Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission,or committee,and your opinion as to the (,)ose, goals, and duties of same: T n p Io wtol a .lu t lop,,„�.,i>- -' - c. r-k s AlEw � r � y PM'k Inc a...e) Q.1"001Z b e etiole Iv wiSlat/ 3;sA0 'fir COames IV d,eareZaP` O. aill.w.1r - k !Y3[, ... %CaI► dal 14-eVa.1v�3 . Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: Paz a 71/&D v%) ow,ei rev,'lk Nci xper C i#n [o ; 'r-i. c 1 lam/. Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? / 5 t Additional information or comments: Pl ce return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard or fax to(817) 3 47. Each application will be kept on file for one(1)year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply an to the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature:, �---- ‘!1��'.c'. 6-G Date: 7 as'9'S' q a S n:\WP-FI ESlcrnr5ECTORMS APO NTh N.FRM 5-qg — ii - City of Southl- . i 411. lI $-�96` ' ,:rt,,,I,_,... APPLICATION FOR AP ' - � � �Jth;ak .� _ E..0 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: P ' ,w axt, (name of board, commission or committee) *Use a separate application for each appointment desired • Name: rt.ttic p, • I; / Address: A n.0-- /O/< .,Ad. / , - ,B 7a sl, Home Phone: Years in City: U - Employer: ger1?/4y s, Phone: C77 l c 3 —moo 7 Current and/or previous board,commission,or committee experience in tie& of'S ittake // 7 Reasons for desiring to serve on this b9ard,commis�,�'.pn, r committee and your,ot on as t j pose, goals,and duties " ) �f� �'`�t'o.'O "�w`� of same_ wg__n_� 5) §op ,,t n l- t .I- 6 4.-LIZIAfil L ztfro,u, - (1,6 04_,y,444.-Azu,S(1_0616ti iket€1.0-e_ . Cs- ,e- ?4-e) la -d_)2-i7r_A-e-rt. -, gt • cO ualifi142_,cations xpe '.se ce thaw as 'st s iti ,---rai - c '7 • itL., ,,a_i , e ,_ t_m_d, • /5 -4_,;_,441,t.Ltit. , ,...,,,,„,..,,, , mo, • IT I Do you understand and agree +i at your re/q attendance�lnd active support arerequired as a..o,/- y fit. and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? � i Additional information or comments: i - 1 Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard or fax to(817) '747. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply date ormation herein if y wish to continue to be considered fo r appointment. ry Signa - 'Z /g7k Date: q a L D:\WP- CI7YSE oRMS1APotM[MDI.FRM 5-4g .- .4 City of So ake • , ,......,_. .,,A„,, APPLICATION FOR APP I I. " ''.OFFICE �` •a ..Jth,ak'- la APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: h/Z S : //LOL A7C4-0-x, (name of board, commission or committee) 'Use a separate application for each ointment desired Name: 0-1 'es' 5 O 1''1 S�/— Address: 4 5 F - lb o t"4-_ ,€d Home Phone: .3 Z `'1 - 3/ Z 3 _ Years in City: V Employer 14 P n"G P-C a÷ /✓ t-y'Gci t c,I‹. Phone: 2 /Y' 7 5-?-?5 5 Current and/or previous board,commission,or committee experience in the City of Southlake: Reasons for desiring to serve on this board,commission,or committee,and your opinion as to the _ Slow,ose,goals,and duties of same: S `,4 a-C 3 c,-arks cll.. , 'dA 1 a G C Qom` n c -e c f , c. G r e s ,_,../ j G:/b�-�, a � 0� L:..1/1- ca— a `" / Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this positi n:?J ----a, � 2CV3 -e-f ''''.`" // 4( fe---t^ ,Q* C,4-4-."-ce-cdc4->/0 k-- /A/1. i 4,,c_4.-1.---.5 .... e, Le.4--c �G�vl - , '�--) �� ya�---t, ba ��f&a. 7/ ,, 425 . Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active suppo are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? -C.- S Additional information or comments: Please return this completed form to the CitySecret ary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard or fax to (817) 3 `'47. Each appl' ation will be kept on file for one (1)year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply tto th= . o,.. ;on herein if y wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature: Date: qa: 10 D:\WP-FII.ES\Ct1YSEC ORMSWPOQVr .FRM 5-4% •,,,' MAR-3,111•••07 NO" 22233;a _ , * eis-li-niteessarin . / .*:. ..„_...„....,...., ._ ., , . • .......,„ 3: .r.... 0... 4-,-.. _ ...-- . -..., 41011- . City of So-adage •X .,,, - --Tel 117=4741 APPLICATION FOR APP . DUt-h‘C`K • ii v _ . . • / APPLICATION FOR APPOINTNENT TO: . /itI i . • K. \or( enapr....01EM0.0 1 i • 1 0.11 0 '0111 SI pi iNka,.., eir.rer,viw.. L'• N -.' • I #1.5L 40116 . _ - - 11511 ' ' - . , Name:. 4 ErF gavlo ......_.-- t 1 Add zss: Jot li4"6rest 7"--M7A .50NIAAto. . nom:, ...— i I _ 1.1mi Phan: N Yon in a I 3a9 /CV& ... - , ----c::: ir - . Employer: 7.44/jfir-fite::KeGiiiiidi/S -ht..7 , Current andior previous boon!,commission,or committee covariance hi die City of' ..•• . • . 1 ; iileil ...._ i . 1 ' 'Reasons for desiring to save on this board,commission,or committee,and 3'01ff • ..•-• . as to die Le.puipOsc,goals,smirks:les of same: .... !..1 , 44 4 I . _ . 1 . . • —........., . . i • t .................... _ 0* • ificationa and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: . -1-.. ..-__..... - C-flt 4*/gelkal-iii--------__ -_ , 1. . ' ' . . , Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are -• . -t as an ippo. intee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? 1 . ' Additional information or comments: - ...; , i ;i . t .—..............--....— I 1 Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office,1/25 E.Soutblake : . • • ipEarrimikatim will be kept on file for one(1)year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply end ..•-; tho iiecamttion herein If you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. . . . _ . Signature. <::Mil'- '------------ "Pjust‘cullEct .. ---- --- 61 G.7 II fl* i ! , NON 22:a4 .2 • Cr,' 1. I Y desire this position because my dandy and I, recently released front Kansas City, appreciate� and wish to -. contribute to maintaining, and enhancing, Its nnigoe qualities and An additional reason I am applying for this position is that my employer urges employe= to be involved in their comimmities. I am camaaody involved primarily from a financial mint with numerous child 's charges and my church. A position with the Southlake Parks and Recreations board appals to me, and I would appreciate an opportunity to devote a portion of my time to the cause of keeping Souttlabe an exceptionally special pour to live and to raise a family. 2. My qualificadons in this line of work are limited with regards(0 pant, actual txpe=ience with i parks&Recrea ion departdaat. Hawevct, through my work, I manage 270 employees as a vice president. I am an excellent organizer, and motivator. I am creative, and I believe that one should not only work hard, but play hard. Helping to build a city where residents can enjoy themselves and their surroundings would be a gratifying activity. My wife and I have three children and plan to remain in Southlake. We hope to play a part in maintaining the nurturing atmosphere Southlake provides for families. Close friendships with a member of the board fbr the Karnes City Park & Recreations Department and a me-dme member of the board for the San Antonio Parks &Recreation Department eye me confidence that I amqualified . . to contribute in this position, although turning Southlake into a Kansas City or a San Antonio, is not my goal. My wife works for an insurance company in Kansas City, operating out of our home in Southlake. My children, ages 2 - 6, attend Primrose preschool and Carroll Elementary. In the short time we have lived in Southlake, we have routinely enjoyed Bicentennial Park and have participated in several of the Parka & Recreation activities. Your efforts made us feel a part of our new community in a very short time and helped my children meet new friends. Should you feel my qualifications would benefit Southlake, I would be privileged to 'give back" a little of what was given us when we first moved to Southlake. I would be interested in discussing the position in greater detail. Please call me at 214-751-8000. (be CLI � . .. ,-,. .s.,:..".., ..,,A l s, J •l ; ., i I 1 t_:S _�_ City Southlake. _ j . ir..� APPLICATION FOR AP ' I a .,Jth,ak - di APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: Parks ? F?earUa hebn * (name of board, commission or committee) *Use a separate application for each appointment desired Name: A Th 9 if.R 0 Address: 90 Porivi eu! Li,. Home Phone: 82f'8112 Years in City: 1 r = Ca? ha. 1 feller) Employer: 11J'" /.f�• f heOea��,pw Phone: 32 9 —3 SSZ Current and/or previous board,commission,or committee experience in the City of Southlake: Wend'/ a AoflhreePs Gonr i'fee) /110/i fered•effe £S ile,s Reasons for desiring to serve on this board,commission,or committee,and your opinion as to the pose, goals, and duties of same: I wOGC/et lode z4t .o�pe .)411.,rz1C�pit, ner'/Attie iv rot, eo.)trsruir,'y. 1 OOP? e#7 ,i-ffJ/a o.-.01e rer • an el wa�/d to vt 9 Ct rr/'d'� 4e ms i s a.t hey t•/-cah:s9 6eau/i`i4e/Aa*. .f A t .e.yoy 2,1•.21a /' ode.- cont.*t4n.-1 . Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: Y hart d degree le A '.we Feonomsic si/v /. c.GL 4i/14 .,►t••,art /n I. a' Of aeonr., Z. . I have /'veal ♦1, Ace re lex �/ 1 A five r1 ye er bre of P //s s, 1/r.� ArliK k t,:1,r t lvt'k. heave et 4Ddec Ltil /ff .rdf.r99 0 $4/J . rea v Do you understand acid agree that your regular attendaaCe an active support are required as an appointee { and that noncompliance could result in removal from theme board? yes- Additional information or comments: 7 flit✓6 4o .runt!/ C6t//d,ln Qjfd- e rre,*f y.Qlloy Ai/.9 a// of Hte area.parks., Pre, 4?9et!e)ce `4dvEr#si Breadcsrf�g�a cr r 1/rrij Please return this completed p ed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard or fax to(817) 3 747. Each application will be kept on file for one(1)year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply to the i . 7.ti• : her-'. ' ou wis. o continue to be considered for appointment. Signature: — �,7 f-A► _ Date: - --- CI 1 3 DAWP-FILES crrYSECIFOR SNAPOINTIN 1.FRM 5-4% • NOMNOME PEONES Fax:817-490-7029 Pbv 25 '97 9:25 P.01 City of Southlakc APPLICATION FOR Duty O� APPOINTMENT APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: 1-6 er�tD� ieeldirt..gririts �`J�w * (name of board,commission or committee) eUseQ s ieat for aoeh daiied Name: ea a , �i{/N Address: ' (4.MGGNz # 17M . Home Phone: (81i)91-176 0 Yews in City: am. I:- Employer:'IAA nit' Pietro-s /4,14 Phone: dir0 91Xt-474 0 Current and/or previous board,commission,or committee experience in the City of Southlake: A.J42 14 Zj 4ltrt' . Reasons for desiring to serve on this board,commission,or committee,and your opinion as to the purpose,goals,and duties of same: 10 k_ I rtcAP iveeite I ' 4 e. HalatIt7 T4itiri -7111fr 1412.4afixl_„„Lity.s4_&A, T -that 115 QT 0 I . Ai i . I, /I ♦ / I G. i I • 11 Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: ieeaIircAi r e 107-I f f fh �Sa�►L ial e. APIs /I/�sgadive f r1 �i f& 1 1gg7' &mei inmigb6.0IQgg'j 4,si,iLig C ,11 t ' 64 owl aor 44# .i s at- 1!1 itt et are, Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active stTrrt are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? L&S Additional information or comments: •h t., /n iggL ar, �1�aN ' S f lari� [Jt�1(t� COU f' tilA rt I / / c� Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E.Southlake Boulevard or fax to(817) 488-6796. Each application will be kept on file for one(1)year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the mf • if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature: is 1 II. Date: / l g 7 • w. 4,;44 R 4� y I 1 Ji. -it•!!:: ' 1 (6.01 _ _ -Alik- - City of Southlake APPLICATION FOR APP I ' !. Y 4,4` Ii outh:ak t APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: J2., Eci(? ( e of board,commission or committee) *Use a separate application for each appointment desired ' Name: ("A SA o5k-O c Address: 410 (�\. t'&n. - t(l�.... � Home Phone: SZ.rnQ_ Years in City: 4 ut_S. Employer:LAR Y1E2M!.A-10 %Q(Artii s Pho e: ) 4 t -(09 03 Current and/or previous board,commission,or committee experience in the City of Sourthlakr: 4/fee ')Ol.\-i-i a t&1 4 e- .‘1,t9 — 5 jq%M Reasons for desiring to serve on this bo., . co s i ..'- 'on,or committee,and your opinion as to the - purpose,goals,and duties of same.�i 0 . IA 4 . J I Zit, -1 i 0/Z.'. I . ! 'a Wl &ADri7 1 0 ' iI, /..I. I ! •A- t_ L/, %/.'.4!i, LI. '' drii Al ArdrAMIEREMMEEKT 111Mictril.. .. I P. . A A ‘.1. 4401Bri.. 1 ,-VIIL"I t / .' .�... �'/,, 1. I / _ if AS t 1-i /.i. . . , // • w' /e - ,aftc ifications and e , / �-- Q 1 xperi(% n, 2 ,. ould assist you in serving in this position: / (uA�r) u ' ,c rvrr ,f - (Y_ti./r�hr'airlliro ��� 4iuj -,1 ,( Do you understand and agree that your re ar attendance and active support are require as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? Additional information or comments: Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard or fax to(817) 329-1747. Each application will be kept on file for one(1)year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply LI and update the inform • ein if you ' h t n ' ue to be considered for appointment. Si ture: Date: - (q - 7 P DAWP-Fa.ESlcrrYSEC ORMS4+eotN .FR.r'RM q1 . ) s City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 12, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-56, Appointments to the Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District You will recall that three of the Board members appointed to the Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District drew lots for terms expiring September 1, 1998. The three directors whose terms expire this year include current President Andrew Wambsganss, Pam McCain, and Bob Mundlin, all of whom have indicated that they would be willing to serve another term. Resolution No. 98-56 provides for the appointment of the three Board positions. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 City Council meeting agenda for consideration. ys L. City of Southlake,Texas L RESOLUTION 98-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING PERSONS TO SERVE AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE SOUTHLAKE CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT WHEREAS, Tex. Local Government Code, Chapter 363.051 (The "Act") authorizes a municipality that is partially or wholly located in a county with a population of more than one million to create a crime control district within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS,a special election was held on November 4, 1997 to determine whether the voters of the City of Southlake favored the creation of the Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District dedicated to crime reduction programs and the adoption of a proposed local sales and use tax at a rate of on-half of one percent; and WHEREAS, Southlake voters approved the proposition to create the district; and WHEREAS, Board members serve staggered two-year terms that expire September 1, except that three of the initial appointees drew lots to serve terms that expire on September 1 of the first year following creation of the district; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Initial one year terms have expired and the following persons are hereby appointed to serve as the Board of Directors for the Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District for terms to expire September 1, 2000: 1. 2. 3. SECTION 2. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF , 1998. C 9� -a (we CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS MAYOR RICK STACY ATTEST: SANDRA L. LEGRAND CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY C Qie-3 • City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Policy for processing neighborhood requests for traffic management initiatives Traffic Control in Neighborhoods There have been several requests by residents for the installation of stop signs and lowering of speed limits within subdivisions. The requests are being prompted by the residents to discourage traffic flow and speeding within the subdivision, even if the traffic control may not be warranted. Staff can not implement traffic management initiatives that are not warranted. Studies have shown that installing stop signs at intersections not meeting the warrant requirements may, in fact, increase the speed of vehicles between stop signs. Furthermore, by installing more stop signs, the emissions of a vehicle increase with the % additional acceleration. As you may know, the Dallas/Fort Worth region was recently „r downgraded to a "serious" attainment status due to the air quality. The issue is not as simple as denying all requests which do not meet warrants, however. As such, staff has developed the following for processing neighborhood requests: 1. A written request for traffic control must be received by the Department of Public Works. The written request shall include the proposed location and an explanation for the request. 2. Once the written request is received, staff will investigate the location. 3. Once it is determined that additional data needs to be collected to evaluate the intersection or area, the DPW will request the Department of Public Safety (DPS) to place the radar trailer at the location. This is intended to do two things: first, collect data on speed and volume, and second, to educate drivers as to the speed they are traveling. 4. The City will evaluate the data and follow up with residents to determine if additional action is required. cipe 5. If additional action is required, the DPW will request the DPS to station an officer at varied times at the intersection or area to monitor and enforce the speed limit. 10A-1 6. Following the high enforcement activity, staff will evaluate the results and follow up with the residents to determine if the program has been successful. 7. If the further action is needed, staff will hire a traffic engineering consultant to prepare a warrant analysis or study for the proposed location. (Note: each warrant analysis will cost $1200 to $1500) 8. If the proposed location for the stop sign or cross walk is warranted, staff will take appropriate action at the proposed intersection with the traffic control warning signs, if needed. If the requested location for the stop sign is determined not to be warranted, staff will determine if other options are justified. (Average cost of a regulatory sign is $30-$35) 9. If the initiative is not warranted, staff will explain reasons to residents. Staff will prepare a summary of actions in a report to Council, who may then direct staff to place the item on an agenda for Council review and consideration. Attached is a map of locations of traffic management requests. Recommendation Staff recommends Council consider implementation of the above policy to determine necessary traffic controls in neighborhoods upon the request of residents. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre Attachment: Map Exhibit L t 0A-2 CO (010" _=. - — - .}.., 0 Can -_ -- I = �. iloCZ _= O �0 _ ___. _ -- . _ ___ __ _ , ....: o 2 , __ h________ ..... _ ___ _______ ___ __ ,... r1:___._._. _.. . _._ ._.,. IIuI ,� 1 0 _ _ _ _ _ k i___ __. __ �� Cl) A CI _ - _ ai) cy) _---:=-____. -- — - _. 0 _8 - s - rik,a) ara ____, uoi�Cr) _ ____ 2_,_ _ _ __ e� ►equ al - . N- CL 1 Q - i - • -- _ O U) _ = -r_ O -- = _ —= - r o • — - -I-- -- - _ - 3 _,== . ,,, >N � �. _ ____.___ B -__ 1-1__:--- __._ II io 3 City of South lake, Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Neighborhood requests for placement of stop signs and other traffic control devices in Timber Lake and Southridge Lakes subdivisions Background Staff has received several requests for the installation of stop signs in Timber Lake Addition and Southridge Lakes Addition. Lee Engineering, the City's traffic engineering consultant, has conducted warrant analyses for three requested intersections in Timber Lake Addition to conclude whether or not multiway stop signs are warranted. Lee Engineering also conducted the warrant analyses for three requested intersections in Southridge Lakes subdivisions in 1995. The three intersections studied include Timber Lake Circle at Parkcrest, Timber Lake ihire Dr./Timber Lake Way at Timber Lake Circle, and Shorecrest Dr./Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Dr. The warrant analysis report states, "None of the three (3) warranting criteria for multiway stops provided in the TMUTCD (Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices), or the alternate warrant criteria provided in Appendix B of the TMUTCD, are met for any of the three intersections. The results of the multiway stop control warrant analysis show that existing volumes (and delays) are not above the levels defined in the warrants." However, a single stop sign has been installed for northbound Lake Forest Dr. at the intersection of Shorecrest Dr./Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Dr. Because the second condition of the stop sign is met. The attached warrant analysis document contains more detail of the study. Based upon the Timberlake HOA's requests, staff has installed: • Children at play signs • Speed limit signs • Pedestrian warning signs at the requested locations These signs were placed at the appropriate locations in addition to the stop sign following the traffic engineering recommendations. Timberlake's request included two stop signs at the "T" intersections of Timberlake/Shorecrest and Lake Forest Dr. and Timberlake Circle and Timberlake Dr. If stop signs are to be placed at these locations, only the intersecting "leg" of the "T" or all three "legs" of the intersection should be signed. The HOA also requested that all of the "yield" signs at the cul-de-sac be changed to "stop" signs. This change is not cos-1 necessary as state law requires the cul-de-sac street to yield to the through street. Cre However, stop signs can replace the yield signs, if this is Council's wish. In Southridge Lakes, the traffic engineer concluded, "None of the three (3) warranting criteria provided in TMUTCD, or the alternate warrant criteria provided in Appendix B of the TMUTCD are met" for multiway stop signs. However, City Council did direct staff to install multiway stop signs at the intersections of Sabine Ct./Pecos Dr. and Southridge Lakes Pkwy. Regulatory signs cost approximately $30-$35 each, depending on size. Based on the warrant analyses results, staff cannot recommend installation of the proposed stop signs. Council may order that stop signs be placed based on other considerations. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre Attachment: Warrant Analyses Reports Letter from Timber Lake HOA (imw, Letter from Southridge Lakes HOA Map Exhibits (Mr' 10 B-2 Le_ Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis for the intersections of Timber Lake Circle at Parkcrest Timber Lake Drive / Timber Lake Way at Timber Lake Circle Shorecrest Drive / Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Drive Prepared for: City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 C , s.••• ' /P..?4401I # • \ * ! • t JOSEP�; T. 7909 2 { 1. 0/1 Prepared by: Lee Engineering, L.L.C. 17440 Dallas Parkway, Suite 204 Dallas, TX 75287 C August 7, 1998 108_3 MULTIWAY STOP CONTROL WARRANT ANALYSIS The City of Southlake, Texas has requested that an analysis be conducted to determine if all-way, or multiway, stop control is warranted at the intersections of Timber Lake Circle at Parkcrest, Timber Lake Drive/ Timber Lake Way at Timber Lake Circle, and Shorecrest Drive/Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Drive. These three intersections are all located in the Timber Lake subdivision. This report summarizes the results of a multiway stop control warrant analysis for each of the three intersections. The analysis used existing traffic volumes which were collected at the three intersections on Tuesday, August 4, 1998. The analysis is based on the multiway stop control warrants contained in Part II-B "Regulatory Signs" of the Texas A'fwrua!on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). Three warrants are included in the manual for warranting multiway stop sign installations. These warrants include: 1. Installing multiway stop control as an interim measure while arrangements are being made for a traffic signal installation, 2. An accident warrant, and 3. Minimum traffic volumes. Intersection Geometrics The streets at these three intersections are all two-lane undivided local streets with a posted speed limit of30 mph. The intersection of Timber Lake Circle at Parkcrest is a four-leg intersection with traffic on Parkcrest required to stop at this intersection. The intersection of Timber Lake Drive/ Timber Lake Way at Timber Lake Circle is a three-leg intersection with Timber Lake Circle traffic required to stop. At this intersection, Timber Lake Circle tees into Timber Lake Drive/Timber Lake Way. The intersection of Shorecrest Drive/Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Drive is also a three- leg intersection, but no type of traffic control exists at this intersection. Lake Forest Drive tees into Shorecrest Drive/Timber Lake Circle. Warrant Analysis Warrant 1 The first warrant allows for multiway stop control as an interim measure to control traffic while arrangements are being made for a traffic signal installation, if the traffic signal is warranted and is urgently needed. A traffic signal has not been warranted at any of the three intersections. This warrant is not met for any of the intersections. Warrant 2 Warrant 2 is satisfied when five or more reported accidents, of the type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation, have occurred within a 12-month period. Based on accident data obtained from the Southlake Police Department, there have been four accidents in the Timber Lake subdivision within the last 12 months. However, there were no more than two (2) accidents at any of the subject intersections. This warrant is not met for any of the three intersections. .Jultiway Stop Control Warrant Analyses-Timber Lake Subdivision Page 1 10B-4 Warrant 3 Warrant 3 is based on minimum traffic volumes and delays. It is satisfied when both of the following criteria are met: a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour. These criteria may be reduced to 70% of the above requirements when the 85th percentile speed exceeds 40 mph on the major street. Recent speed data has indicated the 85th percentile speed to be near the posted speed limit of 30 mph. Therefore, the analysis was conducted using the full warrant volumes. The hourly traffic volumes for the three intersections are included in the Appendix. At each of the intersections, the eight (8)hourly periods with the highest number of vehicles entering the intersection were identified. The average total vehicular volume entering the intersection over the eight (8)hours was calculated and compared to the criteria contained in part "a" of this warrant. Table 1 summarizes the peak hour and average total vehicular volume entering the intersection at each of the three intersections and compares these values to the criteria in part "a" of this warrant. (re Table 1. Peak Hour and Average Total Vehicu lar ular Volumes Entering Intersections Volumes (vph) Part A of Intersection Peak Average Part A of Warrant 3 Hour 8 Hours Warrant 3 Viet? Timber Lake Circle at Parkcrest 111 96 500 NO Timber Lake Drive/ Timber Lake Way 124 107 500 NO at Timber Lake Circle Shorecrest Drive/ Timber Lake Circle 118 96 500 NO at Lake Forest Drive Based on this table, the average total vehicular volume entering each of these intersections do not meet the minimum volume criteria (500 vph) identified in part "a" of this warrant. Therefore, part "b" of this warrant was not analyzed. For all three intersections, this warrant is not met. L Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analyses-Timber Lake Subdivision Page 2 10B-5 • Alternate Warrant UsingVolume and Stop Delay The TMUTCD also provides an alternate set of warrants which utilize traffic volumes and delay to determine the justification of multiway stop control based on minimum traffic volumes. This warrant is presented in Appendix B of the TMUTCD. The warrant states that traffic volumes at some intersections reach a point where it becomes more desirable to permit a large total intersection delay under multiway stop control than to permit long average delays to vehicles stopped under two-way stop control. The warrant provides a table which is used to determine the volume threshold where an increase in total intersection delay under all-way stop control is more favorable than an undesirable average delay time to stopped vehicles under two-way stop control. Under worst-case conditions, the average four- hour intersection volumes should be greater than 400 vehicles in order to see any benefits. However, none of the three intersections had average four-hour intersection volumes greater than 120 vehicles. Therefore, all-way stop control would not be beneficial at any of these three intersections based on this table. This warrant also provides a figure for estimating average delay, over a fifteen minute period, for stopped vehicles under two-way stop control for use when delay data is not available. This figure requires 15-minute total intersection volumes to be greater than 200 vehicles. Since this volume level does not exist for any of the intersections, existing stopped delay at each of the three intersections Lie is reasonable under two-way stop control. Due to the low total intersection volumes at these three intersections, the magnitude of delay is such that the stop control that currently exists is desirable and reasonable. Therefore, this alternate warrant for multiway stop installation is not met for any of the three intersections. Stop Sign Warrant Analysis Currently, no traffic control is provided at the intersection of Shorecrest Drive / Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Drive. Therefore, a stop sign warrant analysis was performed at this intersection. This analysis is based on the stop control warrants contained in Part II-B "Regulatory Signs" of the TMUTCD. A stop sign may be warranted at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: 1. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous, or 2. Street entering through highway or street, or 3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area, or 4. Combination of high speed, restricted view, and serious accident record. The second condition is applicable for the intersection of Shorecrest Drive/ Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Drive. Since this intersection is three-legged, Lake Forest Drive tees into (ends at) (imie Shorecrest Drive / Timber Lake Circle. Traffic on Lake Forest Drive must then enter Shorecrest .'lultiway Stop Control Warrant Analyses- Timber Lake Subdivision Page 3 108-6 (we Drive/Timber Lake Circle. Therefore, the second condition of the stop sign warrant analysis is met. A stop sign for northbound traffic on Lake Forest Drive would more clearly assign the right of way at this intersection. Conclusions None of the three (3) warranting criteria for multiway stops provided in the TMUTCD, or the alternate warrant criteria provided in Appendix B of the TMUTCD, are met for any of the three intersections. The results of the multiway stop control warrant analysis show that existing volumes (and delays) are not above the levels defined in the warrants. Multiway stop signs are not warranted at any of the three intersections. Based on the stop sign warrant analysis, it is recommended that a stop sign be installed for northbound Lake Forest Drive traffic at the intersection of Shorecrest Drive/ Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Drive. L., Lip, Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analyses-Timber Lake Subdivision page a 1 nB-7 C APPENDIX C C los-8 Timber Lake Circle at Parkcrest 1 Timber Lake Circle Parkcrest Total Minor Street i NB SB WB EB Volume Volume 12:00 AM - 01:00 AM 3 6 1 1 11 2 01:00 AM - 02:00 AM 3 1 2 0 6 2 02:00 AM - 03:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 1 03:00 AM - 04:00 AM 1 3 1 2 7 3 04:00 AM - 05:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 1 05:00 AM - 06:00 AM 0 3 3 0 6 3 06:00 AM - 07:00 AM 7 15 10 2 34 12 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 11 28 16 1 56 17 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM 24 26 29 7 86 36 09:00 AM - 10:00 AM 17 20 14 1 52 15 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM 31 34 18 6 89 24 i 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 30 39 27 11 107 38 12:00 PM - 01:00 PM 24 43 21 6 94 27 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 20 40 29 10 99 39 02:00 PM - 03:00 PM 19 25 15 2 61 17 03:00 PM - 04:00 PM 12 33 28 3 76 31 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM , 29 27 27 3 86 30 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 27 33 32 0 92 32 06:00 PM - 07:00 PM 38 35 32 6 111 38 07:00 PM - 08:00 PM 12 22 24 4 62 28 08:00 PM - 09:00 PM 13 22 26 7 68 33 09:00 PM - 10:00 PM 12 9 11 0 32 11 (lor" 10:00 PM - 11:00 PM 11 9 20 0 40 20 11:00 PM - 12:00 AM _ 4 5 3 0 12 3 L 10E3_9 (bre Timber Lake Drive / Timber Lake Way at Timber Lake Circle Timber Lake Drive 'Timber Lake Circle Total Minor Street WB EB NB Volume Volume 12:00 AM - 01:00 AM 3 2 8 13 8 _ 01:00 AM - 02:00 AM 2 2 6 10 6 02:00 AM - 03:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 AM - 04:00 AM 0 1 1 2 1 04:00 AM - 05:00 AM 1 0 2 3 2 05:00 AM - 06:00 AM 4 4 7 15 7 - 06:00 AM - 07:00 AM 10 0 22 32 22 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 17 8 34 59 34 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM 18 17 48 83 48 09:00 AM - 10:00 AM 12 11 31 54 31 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM 31 28 54 113 54 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 17 20 50 87 50 12:00 PM - 01:00 PM 27 26 61 114 61 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 26 31 55 112 55 02:00 PM - 03:00 PM 22 22 52 96 52 03:00 PM - 04:00 PM 21 22 42 85 42 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 23 41 60 124 60 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 10 37 53 100 53 06:00 PM - 07:00 PM 15 31 63 109 63 07:00 PM - 08:00 PM 21 25 45 91 45 08:00 PM - 09:00 PM 21 24 37 82 37 09:00 PM - 10:00 PM 11 29 26 66 26 (iiire' 10:00 PM - 11:00 PM 13 10 32 55 32 11:00 PM - 12:00 AM 6 4 6 16 6 Lie 108-10 Li Shorecrest Drive / Timber Lake Circle at Lake Forest Drive I Shorecrest Drive Lake Forest Drive Total Minor Street! WB EB NB Volume Volume 12:00 AM - 01:00 AM 4 0 10 14 10 i 01:00 AM - 02:00 AM 3 1 8 12 8 02:00 AM - 03:00 AM 1 1 1 3 1 03:00 AM - 04:00 AM 3 0 3 6 3 04:00 AM - 05:00 AM 0 1 1 2 1 05:00 AM - 06:00 AM 1 0 0 1 0 06:00 AM - 07:00 AM 11 9 10 30 10 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 24 13 31 68 31 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM 23 17 42 82 42 09:00 AM - 10:00 AM 12 13 31 56 31 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM 32 13 43 88 43 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 24 12 49 85 49 12:00 PM - 01:00 PM 34 7 51 92 51 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 39 12 48 99 48 02:00 PM - 03:00 PM 23 11 39 73 39 03:00 PM - 04:00 PM 28 9 29 66 29 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 24 8 55 87 55 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 47 19 52 118 52 06:00 PM - 07:00 PM 35 11 67 113 67 07:00 PM - 08:00 PM 31 6 36 73 36 i 08:00 PM - 09:00 PM 20 14 28 62 28 09:00 PM - 10:00 PM 10 5 27 42 27 (lissoi 10:00 PM - 11:00 PM 10 5 21 36 21 11:00 PM - 12:00 AM 5 1 12 18 12 (kw loB-» C Multiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis for Southridge Lakes Parkway and Pecos Drive/Sabine Court Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (South) Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (North) Prepared for: (we City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Prepared by: Lee Engineering, Inc. 5323 Spring Valley Rd. #230 Dallas, TX 75240 PEE O F e..'► PARR ' H ',4 co' November 27, 1995 .' V�;, Jf v. T. ECG F' a.L l0g'12 . NIULTIWAY STOP CONT ROL WARRANT ANALYSIS The City of Southlake, Texas has requested that an analysis be conducted to determine if all-way, or multiway, stop control is warranted at three (3) intersections. These intersections include: • Southridge Lakes Parkway and Pecos Drive/Sabine Court • Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (South) • Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (North) This report summarizes the results of the multi-way stop control warrant analysis for the intersections. The analysis is based upon existing traffic volumes which were collected on Thursday, November 2, 1995. Additionally, the report provides recommendations for traffic control to alert motorists to the possible presence of pedestrians crossing Southridge Lakes Parkway at the intersections of interest. The analysis is based on the multiway stop control warrants contained in Part la-B "Regulatory Signs" of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(TMUTCD). Three warrants are included in the manual for warranting multiway stop sign installations. These warrants include: 1. installing multiway stop control as an interim measure while arrangements are being made for a traffic signal installation, (11iipe 2. An accident warrant, and 3. Minimum traffic volumes. Intersection Geolnetrics Southridge Lakes Parkway is a four (4) lane divided roadway at the intersections with Pecos Drive/Sabine Court and Brazos Drive (south) and a two (2) lane undivided roadway at the intersection with Brazos Drive(north). The posted speed on Southridge Lakes Parkway is 30 mph. Pecos Drive/Sabine Court and Brazos Drive are two lane residential streets. The intersection of • Southridge Lakes Parkway with Pecos Drive/Sabine Court is a four-leg intersection. The remaining two intersections are three-leg intersections. Warrant Analysis Warrant I The first warrant allows for multiway stop control as an interim measure to control traffic while arrangements are being made for a traffic signal installation, if the traffic signal is warranted and is urgently needed. Traffic signals have not been warranted at these intersections. This warrant is not met for any of the intersections. L AJultiway Stop Control Warrant Analysis -Southlake Texas Page I /10B-13 + Lie Warrant 2 Warrant 2 is satisfied when five or more reported accidents, of the type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation, have occurred within a 12-month period. Based on accident data obtained from the Southlake Police Department, a total of two (2) accidents has occurred at all three intersections during the past four(4) years. Neither accident is of the type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. This warrant is not met for any of the intersections. A more detailed description of the accident history is included in the Appendix. Warrant 3 Warrant 3 is based on minimum traffic volumes and delays. It is satisfied when both of the following criteria are met: a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the came 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour. These criteria may be reduced to 70% of the above requirements when the 85-percentile speed exceeds 40 mph on the major street. A speed study was not conducted to determine the 85-percentile speed on Southridge Lakes Parkway.• The posted speed limit on Southridge Lakes Parkway is 30mph. The analysis was conducted for the full warrant volumes and the reduced warrant volumes to determine the effect, if any, of the 85-percentile speed on the analysis. The traffic volumes for the three intersections are included in the Appendix At each intersection the eight (8) hourly periods with.the highest number of vehicles entering the intersection were identified. The average total vehicular volume entering the intersection over the eight(8)hours was calculated and compared to the criteria contained in portion "a" of the warrant. The average total vehicular volumes entering the intersections are: Southridge Lakes Parkway and Pecos Drive/Sabine Court: 286 vehicles per hour Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (South): 245 vehicles per hour Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (North): 195 vehicles per hour The average total vehicular volume entering each intersection does not meet the minimum volume criteria based upon the full volume warrant (500 vehicles per hour) or the reduced volume warrant (350 vehicles per hour). Additionally, the average minor street entering volumes were determined for the same eight (8)hours and compared to the criteria contained in portion "b" of the warrant. The average hourly entering volumes for the minor street approaches are: L Multrway Stop Control Warrant.-Inalvszs-Southlake Texas Page 2 10B-14 Pecos Drive/Sabine Court: 32 vehicles per hour Brazos Drive (South): 64 vehicles per hour Brazos Drive (North): 34 vehicles per hour The average minor street volumes also do not meet the minimum volume criteria for any hours of the day based on the full volume warrant (200 units per hour) or the reduced volume warrant (140 units per hour). The delay criteria were not evaluated since the minor street volume criteria are not met. The minimum volume criteria are not met for any of the intersections based upon the full volume warrants or the reduced volume warrants. Alternate Warrant Using Volume and Stop Delay The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD) also provides an alternate set of warrants which utilize traffic volumes and delay to determine the justification of multiway stop control based on minimum traffic volumes. This warrant is presented in Appendix B of the TMUTCD. The warrant states that traffic volumes at some intersections reach a point where it becomes more desirable to permit a large total intersection delay under multiway stop control than to permit long average delays to vehicles stopped under two-way stop controL The warrant provides a table which is used to determine the volume threshold where an increase in total intersection delay under all-way stop control is more favorable than an undesirable average delay time to stopped vehicles under two-way stop control. The warrant also provides a figure for estimating average delay, over a fifteen minute period, for stopped vehicles under two-way stop control for use when delay data is not available. Using this table, average delays to the stopped approaches were estimated for the three intersections for the peak four(4)hours at each intersection. Based on the figure, the average delay for all stopped approaches under two-way stop control was estimated to be less than 5 seconds per vehicle for each fifteen(15)minute period assessed and over the four(4)hour period. The data used in this analysis are presented in the Appendix. This magnitude of delay for the stopped approaches under two-way stop control is very desirable and reasonable. Based on this magnitude of delay it is not recommended that multiway stop control be warranted under this alternate warrant. View Obstructions Site visits were made to each of the three intersections to determine the existence of any view obstructions that could possibly impede the vision of motorists as they attempt to enter Southridge Lakes Parkway from the side streets. With one exception, the visibility of motorists on the minor streets is not obstructed. The one exception is located on the northeast corner of Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (south) and involves an electrical vault surrounded by large screening bushes. A westbound motorist, stopped at the stop sign, encounters difficulty in seeing southbound vehicles on Southridge Lakes Parkway. .tiultzw•ay Stop Control Warrant Analysts-Southlake Texas Page 3 7 1oB-15 As a general rule traffic cont rol devices should not be used in an attempt to mitigate an undesirable situation caused by a view obstruction, especially if the view obstruction can be removed. Since this view obstruction is located within the sight triangle established by city ordinance, it is recommended that the obstruction be removed. Until the vault and screening bushes can be removed or relocated, it is recommended that a stop line be placed on Brazos Drive (south). Since vehicles will not be expected to stop at the stop sign, the stop line should be placed at the desired stopping point, which is closer to the curb line on Southridge Lakes Parkway where the view obstruction is not a factor. Stop signs should not be installed on Southridge Lakes Parkway in an effort to offset the effects of the view obstruction. Traffic Control for Pedestrian Crossing An assessment was done to evaluate traffic control to alert motorists of pedestrians crossing Southridge Lakes Parkway. As shown in Figure 1, it is recommended that an advance crossing sign (W 11-2) be placed on the Parkway in advance of the intersections. The signs shall be placed approximately 325' in advance of the intersections per Table II-1, A Guide for Warning Sign Placement Distance, of Part 11-C "Warning Signs" of the TMUTCD. The signs shall be black legend on yellow background and shall be 30"x30" in size. If installed, the signs and installation shall comply with the requirements set forth in the TMUTCD. These include a mounting height of at least seven(7)feet and a lateral clearance of two (2) feet from the curb face. These are shown in Figure 2-1, Height and Lateral Location of Signs- Typical installations, of the TMUTCD. (lye Pedestrian crosswalks were considered as pa rt rt of the assessment. Part III "Markings" of the TMUTCD, states that crosswalk markings should not be used indiscriminately and that crosswalks should only be marked at intersections where there is substantial conflict between vehicle and pedestrian movements. Crosswalk striping tends to give a pedestrian a false sense of security. Often pedestrians feel that the crosswalk striping gives them the right-of-way and that vehicles will stop for them As a result they may tend to pay less attention to approaching vehicles and carelessly step into approaching traffic. This can create an extremely dangerous situation. Based upon the accident data obtained from the Southlake Police Department, there were no pedestrian accidents reported at the intersections in the past four (4) years. Crosswalk striping on the non-controlled Southridge Lakes Parkway approaches is not preferred. Conclusion The results of the multiway stop control warrant analysis show that existing traffic volumes do not warrant all-way stop control. None of the three (3) warranting criteria provided in the TMfUTCD, or the alternate warrant criteria provided in Appendix B of the TMUTCD are met. Therefore, it is recommended that only the minor street approaches continue to be stop controlled. It is further recommended that the view obstruction at the northeast corner of Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(south)be removed. As an interim measure, it is recommended that a stop Lline be installed on Brazos Drive (south) at the location where vehicles are expected to stop so that the motorist's view of approaching southbound vehicles is not obstructed. bfultiwav Stop Control Warrant Analysts-Southlake Ter Page 4 C: 108-16' Install WI 1-2 (Advance Pedestrian Crossing Sign) j (----- Bros Drive (i�;orth) Install W 1 L-2 (Advance Pedestrian Crossing Sign) Loo. ,� rya �/ ic stall W11-2 cco5r`1c� (Advance Pedestrian Crossing Sign) 4 7/1 Sab fie \ Install W11-2 (Advance Pedestrian Crossing Sign) • (hire E[ c Enc;nzERino Figure 1. Pedestrian Crossing Traffic Control 108-17 Timber Lake Homeowners Association c/o SBB Management Company 5728 LBJ Freeway, Suite 460 Dallas, TX 75240 June 16, 1998 Mayor Rick Stacy and City Council City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Road Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Sirs: On behalf of the residents of the Timber Lake community in Southlake, we are requesting a series of measures to enhance the safety of pedestrians and motorists in Timber Lake. As a result of a prior request in August 1997, speed limit and other traffic signs were initially installed in Timber Lake. However, we strongly feel that current conditions warrant more aggressive steps to insure the safety of our neighborhood. The specific issues that cause our deeper concern are summarized below (and detailed in the attached report); these include: • traffic counts increasing from 60% to over 100% in a six month time period, per DPS statistics, and likely to increase in the near future • speeding violations which indicate that at on average one of six drivers is exceeding the posted 30 MPH speed limit, with certain incidences of speeding as high as 21% (one in Eve motorists), per DPS statistics • high pedestrian counts, highlighted by over 200 children walking to and from multiple school bus stops (in a community that does not have sidewalks) and a steady volume of walkers/joggers in the street • street designs which are predominately curvilinear in nature, creating numerous "blind spots," and • an apparent inconsistency in "signage"and other traffic control features in Timber Lake in comparison to other neighboring communities. We are specifically requesting that the City Council take the following actions at the earliest opportunity: • install "stop"signs at critical points in Timber Lake, as identified in the attached report • install "pedestrian crossing"signs at those locations where the primary walking path crosses main streets, and • reduce the speed limit in the neighborhood from 30,V1PH to 25 MPH. 1O .18 2 Cr' We appreciate the opportunity to have met with both the DPS (on May 12, -1998) and the DPW (on May 26, 1998) to develop an understanding of the various issues associated with these requests. Their input, support, and practical advice in developing and refining our"final" request for your consideration (see attachment to this letter) were appreciated.. Both the DPS and DPW were highly supportive of our efforts and attentive to our concerns throughout this process. We anticipate a continued dialogue with both the DPW and DPS relative to other enhancements that can be implemented to address our safety issues. We look forward to a prompt review of this situation by the City Council, DPS and DPW and the installation of the requested signage and the reduction in the speed limit. Please contact either Hillary Smedsrud or Mark Creighton at the phone numbers shown below with any questions that may arise from these requests. Sincerely, for the Timber Lake Homeowners Board for the Timber Lake Safety/Crime Watch Committee (hlir Mark T. Creighton Hillary Smedsrud 251-4801 251-1090 (re 106-19 3 (tre TIMBER LAKE TRAFFIC AND SPEEDING ISSUES June 16,1998 Objectives: Enhance safety of pedestrians and drivers in Timber Lake by reducing speed limits and installing "stop" and other traffic signs. Back2round: In 9/97. after a request to the Southlake City Council by the Timber Lake Homeowners' Advisory Board, a number of traffic signs were installed in Timber Lake, including "30 MPH Speed Limit" and "Children at Play" signs at all entrances to the neighborhood. However, traffic counts in the neighborhood have been steadily increasing—due to near completion of all 300+ homes and a substantial amount of"drive through"traffic (taking a shortcut through Timber Lake to avoid White Chapel/1709 congestion). Consequently, more aggressive steps are required to limit the high percentage of speeding traffic in Timber Lake and to make Timber Lake a less attractive "shortcut" for non-residents. The Timber Lake Homeowners Board, the Safety/Crime Watch Committee of this board, and individual Timber Lake homeowners feel that these more aggressive steps are needed for the following reasons: 1.) Increased Traffic Counts In Timber Lake Traffic counts from three different days on different streets in Timber Lake (as measured by the Southlake DPS "Smart Trailer) present a compelling argument to support these claims of increased traffic counts; the full results of the surveys are attached: Traffic Counts 8/97 to 3/98 Dates Measured: TH 8/28/97 F 10/24/97 TH 3/12/98 % Increase Comparable Times * 7:45 am— 10:30 am 67 100 107 60% * I:00pm— 2:30 pm 37 72 78 108% It should also be noted that these three different readings were all for "southbound" vehicle counts, which may seriously "under-count" total traffic due to the higher volume of vehicles exiting from the northbound entrance to Timber Lake on to 1709. In addition, these rising vehicle counts occurred in a period when new home construction-related traffic was decreasing dramatically due to the `build-out" in Timber Lake. There is also an anticipation of a further increase in "shortcut" traffic as a result of the soon-to-be- installed traffic light on 1709 at Shady Oaks, scheduled for July 1998. 108-20 3 Coe 2.) Speeding Violations in Timber Lake Unfortunately, the same "Smart Trailer" data as cited above was of no value with regard to determining average speeds because the "Smart Trailer" was placed in such a position that motorists could observe the device before their vehicle was within measuring range in each incident. Per Sat. Daniels, the DPS officer responsible for this equipment, this occurred because of the nature of the streets in Timber Lake -" . . .there are no straight-aways that allow a good set-up.- However, even this"flawed" data did indicate that the average speed in Timber Lake increased by 3.4 :tiIPH between the 8/97 and 3/98 measurements, while the percentage of speeders (over 30 MPH) also increased. Recent discussions between representatives of the Timber Lake Homeowners Board and the Safety/Crime Watch Committee of this Board and Billy Campbell, Director of the Southlake DPS and Gary Gregg, Director of Police Services, were extremely helpful in better determining the nature of speeding violations in Timber Lake. For example, despite the fact that a total of 49 traffic citations were issued between May 1996 and May 1998 in Timber Lake, only three of these citations were for speeding. This law incidence was the result of a DPS practice of granting up to a 9 MPH variance above the posted 30 MPH speed limit before issuing a citation. Given this existing DPS practice and the need for statistics to support (or not support) the (4., hypothesis that speeding is an issue in Timber Lake, Billy Campbell suggested collecting this data via the use of an unmarked surveillance vehicle in Timber Lake; the results of this monitoring are as follows: Dates W 5/27/98 Th 5/29/98 F 5/30/98 Time of Day 4:00 - 7:30 pm 4:30 - 7:30 pm 7:00 - 9:00 am Locations sib 500 blk DI., Way nib T/L Circle c. bridge stb 500 blk T,L Drive Total = vehicles 225 145 51 % vehicles > 30 MPH 12% 21% 14% These three measurements show that on average one out of six (16%) of motorists in Timber Lake is currently exceeding the speed limit, with the incidence of speeding as high as one of five drivers in certain areas of the community. 3.) Pedestrian Safety A sigtiticant number of pedestrians must utilize the streets of Timber Lake for walking to their destinations due to the absence of sidewalks in the community. This fundamental safety concern is especially acute due to the number of school age children who must walk in the street in order to meet CISD buses each day - a total of 208 children are served by five buses in the morning and afternoon, with twenty-two children riding the mid-day kindergarten bus. Le A steady number of other community residents out for walks/j g Q o �,lo��n� must also contend with vehicular traffic due to the absence of sidewalks. • 10B-21 S Ce 4.) Street Desi;n Issues In addition to the absence of sidewalks, the basic "curvilinear" design of the majority of Timber Lake's main streets creates numerous 'blind spots" which raise the risk of hitting a pedestrian or stationary object. Vehicles have destroyed (numerous curb mailboxes when their drivers could not navigate these curved streets — generally in broad daylight.) In addition, at least one incident has occurred in which a motorist swerved his vehicle to avoid colliding with another vehicle approaching on a curbing street, and then jumped the curb, narrowly missing a child playing in the front yard. Per Sergeant Daniels' observations regarding the "Smart Trailer," there are no straight streets in Timber Lake! 5.) Timber Lake Signa2e Not On Par With Nei2hborin2 Communities Other neighboring communities appear to have more appropriate traffic signage than does Timber Lake: • Southridge Lakes is similar to Timber Lake due to the amount of through traffic that uses Southridge Lakes Parkway to connect to Peytonville. However, their traffic issues are well-addressed by: (we — sidewalks on either side of the Parkway, — secondary roads that run parallel to the Parkway, — all feeder streets and courts have yield or stop signs, white lines clearly mark the point where the walking trail crosses the Parkway, and — additional signs placed before the stop signs warn that a stop is coming. • Stone Lakes does not have through traffic, but does have two entrances (one controlled by a light) on 1709. The traffic issues for this community are managed by: — sidewalks, — all feeder streets and courts have yield or stop signs — numerous intersections with a four way stop • Timarron includes numerous through streets due to its size, but still manages to address most traffic issues: — most feeder streets and courts have stop signs — sidewalks exist on one side of the street, and — no houses are located directly on the main through streets (Continental and Byron Nelson) • Coventry Manor, despite its location away from direct access to 1709, has a fair amount of through traffic, but currently uses the following to at least attempt to csie minimize its traffic issues: — sidewalks on both sides of the street and — a four way stop at its main intersection. 108_22 6 cre Specific Actions Requested: Per recent conversations with Bob W nitehead and others at the DPW, the Timber Lake Homeowners Board and the Safety Committee are aware that it may be necessary to perform various reviews to insure that "stop sign war-rants" are satisfied before installation of these signs. In addition, based on our discussions with DPW, our original informal request for additional stop signs and other signage has been modified to request only those signs which are felt by the Timber Lake community to be absolutely required AND which are appropriate AND which are likely to have the desired impacts. In the spirit of these discussions with both the DPS and DPW AND based on the current speeding situation in Timber Lake, the Timber Lake Homeowners' Board specifically requests that the Southlake City Council take the following actions at the earliest opportunity: 1) install stop signs at critical points in Timber Lake (a) 4-way stop signs @ Timber Lake Circle/Parkcrest/Parkcrest Court (upgrade from current 2-way stop signs) Note: this heavily-traveled intersection is close to where Timber Lake and Princeton Park merge; in addition, this intersection is close to the location where the highest incidence (21%) of speeding was recorded by the DPS. (b) 2-way stop signs on northbound Lake Forest Drive @ intersection with Timber Lake Circle/Shorecrest and at the eastbound Shorecrest intersection with Lake Forest Drive Note: northbound Lake Forest Drive is the only "T" intersection in Timber Lake without a stop sign, while the other requested stop sign will control the high volume of traffic exiting from Timber Lake via Shorecrest to Lake Forest to Continental (c) one stop sign at eastbound Timber Lake Drive at the intersection with southbound Timber Lake Circle (near the community pool and playground) Note: this intersection was the scene of a recent (6/2/98) accident due to a (non- Timber Lake resident) motorist hitting another vehicle while turning from eastbound Timber Lake Drive to southbound Timber Lake Circle. (d) replace `yield" signs at those exits from courts where they currently exist with "stop" signs in order to reduce the current incidence of vehicles not slowing (40., before entering the main street. Note: certain courts in Timber Lake have "stop" signs already posted. 1os-23 7 Lire At ALL "stop" signs it is requested that a wide white road stripe (similar to the stripe used at the northbound exit from Timber Lake onto Southlake Boulevard) be installed to also highlight the motorists' requirement to stop Lastly, relative to "stop" signs, it is also requested that multiple "faded" stop signs be replaced (or repainted), as needed (2) install "pedestrian crossing" or similar warning signs at the three different points where the neighborhood walking/logging path either crosses a street or "dead ends" These warning signs are especially critical as certain of these locations are on"blind curves" from both directions. a) due west of the Shorecrest/Lake Forest intersection b) at both northbound and southbound Timber Lake Way where the path "dead ends" into the street at Shadow Glen c) at both northbound and southbound Timber Lake Circle where the path crosses the street (just north of the bridge) Notes: the highest incidence (21%) of speeding occurred at northbound Timber Lake Circle at the bridge location where the path crosses the street AND cor a school bus stop is located at the point where the path "dead ends"into Timber Lake Way at Shadow Glen. Prior discussions with the DPW indicated that addition of these"pedestrian crossing" signs could be readily accomplished; fortunately, existing light posts are close to the desirable northbound and southbound sign locations at the bridge on Timber Lake Circle. Appropriate road striping similar to that used in Southridge Lakes is also requested at each of these three locations. 3.) reduce the speed limit in Timber Lake from 30 MPH to 25 MPH It is requested that this revised limit be posted on the three existing speed limit signs L' d at ALL other locations to be determined by the DPW in order to maintain a uniform speed limit in the neighborhood) It is also requested that the existing speed limit sign at the north entrance to Timber Lake (entering Timber Lake from Southlake Boulevard) be moved to directly in front of the existing "stop" sign, perhaps by mounting it on the existing street light. It is felt that this (how location will be more visible directly in front of the motorist while at the "stop" sign; in its current location, the speed limit sign is more difficult to see while driving down this curvilinear entrance street. 108-pq 1994 SO UTHRID GE LAKES HOMEOWNERS AD VISOR Y BOARD ,?ECE ED NOV0 8194 DEPT OFPUBLIC WORKS August 3, 1994 • MR. ROBERT WHITEHEAD DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 NORTH CARROL AVE. SOUTHLAKE, TX. 76092-8898 Dear Mr. Whitehead, As you know the residents of Southridge Lakes are concerned with the traffic situation on Southridge Lakes Parkway. When the Parkway was built, it was erroneously planned as a thruway on the Master Plan for the City. How this could have been approved was beyond the resident's comprehension. We questioned the City as to why they would divide our development with a four lane Parkway. We questioned why four lanes of non-stop traffic would be funneled between half of the development and the playground, swimming pool, tennis courts and amenities' areas of our development. We questioned the safety risk to our children who would have to cross these four lanes of non-stop traffic. The City of Southlake reviewed their prior decision and voted to reduce the Parkway from four lanes to two lanes. They voted to relocate the next phase of the Parkway so that it would not be a straight thruway. This would keep the traffic on Peytonville Road which did not bisect a development and was already approved to 81 feet width. Needless to say, the residents were very grateful for the character and reasonableness of the City Council. That background brings us now to 1994 and the near completion of our development, which will connect the Parkway to Peytonville Road. During the last few years we have experienced an increase in traffic due to growth of our development. This traffic will continue to increase once the Parkway is connected to Peytonville Road. There are over 500 children(and counting) in our development which increases the risk factor of an accident involving children crossing the Parkway. The number of complaints about speeding to the Southlake Police Department are on the increase. The number of citations issued for speeding on the Parkway are increasing monthly(Thanks to the entire Police Department and keep up the good work.). We feel that it is time to slow down the thoroughfare and give our residents and children a few safer locations to cross the Parkway. HAB94\LE I I hRS\STOPSIGN 108-25 • 1994 SOUTHRIDGE LAKES HOMEOWNERS ADVISORY BOARD We have spoken with the Arvida Corporation and they have orally committed to install the stop signs after your approval. This should result as no cost to the City to approve our requests. The contacts at Arvida are Mr. Bret Johnson or Mr. JeffGaskin (214-390-1190). The Residents of Southridge Lakes through the Homeowners Advisory Board request that the City of Southlake approve three (3) stop signs at intersections along the Parkway as follows: 1. Four way stop signs instead of two way stop signs at the intersection of Southridge Lakes Parkway with Sabine Court and Pecos Drive 2. Three way stop signs instead of a one way stop at the intersection of Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive (South end of Parkway). 3. Three way stop signs instead of a one way stop at the intersection of Southridge Lakes Parkway and Brazos Drive(North end of Parkway). Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at 817-329-2149. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to our request. Sincerely, TOM O'MALLEY SOUTHRIDGE LAKES HAB 202 Southridge Lakes Parkway Southlake, Tx. 76092-2827 cc: Arvida Corporation HAB Board Ridge Rap Newsletter L HAB94\L I I I hRS`STOPSIGN 10B-26 L I , ;; .. i! , _ C� RESIDING AT _ IN THE SOUTHRIDGE LAKES DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF-SOUTHLAKE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE THE STOP SIGN REQUEST IN THE ATTACHED LETTER DATED AUGUST 3, 1994 TO MR. ROBERT WHITEHEAD, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. SIGNATURE tll. DATE L I , :: ,r'C RESIDING AT is 2 .� C; IN THE SOUTHRIDGE LAKES DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITYOF SOUTHLAKE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE THE STOP SIGN REQUEST IN THE ATTACHED LETTER DATED AUGUST 3, 1994 TO MR . ROBERT WHITEHEAD,DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. �. / SIGNATURE /5,v DATE L 10B-27 Co (111•.' __. __. '•1 ■J 1 ---- , ._i_-- CO -- -- 4_ 0:5›, Cf) -__ _ - O . - _ 4-0 C13 -_ - , 0 2 a,,,,) _. __ ,, , , , L_____„, 1 , _, .. f_____,,,__, , ,____ , ,_ , ,,,- ,,,___,,y„,_, ,, ,, ._ ____,___;_,,,,,, ,, ___. .,„,_,,_____, , _____ __ yilLz - - r Cl) „iliTri , aii) • . , - -i� _ -_ L (..., W 4•a ._. i 0 �I ___ 11 _ a.) co __: ____H/ ,.__ __ i2 ___ c __. .. 1 .__. ______ __ _____________ . ..... _ _ , , .___ 4,„,,,, ___ _ . ___ , , , _._ , ,, , ,, --,... ___:._______,_ -___.,,--- __ c _____ . .. ____,, ,___I___-7 ',•-_____-• - ,..-' ,,', . 1 I (1) (75 A - _ OTC F 108-28 I 9 1. rru Y z loru � • • /� �� \,/ ..ice i � � +l\ : '�"��.'� � I •� �.' T.` ------------ + -17I _...... ...... r- C L3vxL ' r \T �� o Co n `- t LAi ( . J2 �n�77 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM (147 August 14, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 707, ls` reading,Amending Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code, designating the speed limit as 25 miles per hour for neighborhood streets in the Timber Lake and Southridge Lakes subdivisions. State law dictates that streets within the confines of a city limits that are not signed will have a speed limit of 30 miles per hour. The state also recognizes that the city has the right to post whatever speed limit, within reason, on any of the city owned and maintained roadways. Representatives of the Timber Lake subdivision have recently contacted Council and members of the Southlake Department of Public Safety Police Services, referencing the speed limits in their neighborhood. Approximately one year ago, members of Southridge Lakes contacted Council about this same issue. Members of the Traffic Division monitored various streets in these two neighborhoods in unmarked cars and radar units to determine actual speed. The attached memo from Sergeant Daniels indicates that Southridge Lakes has a greater issue concerning the 25 miles per hour limit than Timber Lake. The Timber Lake figure indicates that the majority of the vehicles travel in the 21-30 miles per hour range, limiting the neighbors exposure to citation. Councilmember Kendall has also observed traffic patterns throughout the city with Department of Public Safety personnel for several shifts, to include this specific issue. We, as the enforcement arm of the city, along with Councilmember Kendall, support the changing of the speed limit in these two neighborhoods from 30 miles per hour to 25 miles per hour in order to assist these neighborhoods in what they perceive as a problem. There will be a nominal cost factor of approximately$55.50 for each sign and pole, with the Department of Public Works installing these signs. The actual amount of signage necessary will be determined by the Department of Public Works. 6.e BC/bls Attachments L 10C-1 l MEMORANDUM October 07, 1997 TO: Gary Gregg, Director of Police Services FROM: Rusty Daniels, Sergeant Police Services SUBJECT: SOUTHRIDGE LAKES SPECIAL DETAIL On Friday, October 03, 1997 I sent Officer Sanders to the 500 block of Southridge lakes Blvd, to work a special detail. His assignment was to take an unmarked city vehicle to that area. Then utilize the laser, and make a traffic count, including vehicle speeds. I checked the data compiled by the radar trailer, and found that a large number of vehicles use that area between 0700 hrs. And 0830 hrs., as well as between 12 noon, and 1400 hrs. Officer Sanders started the survey at 0700 hrs, and ran it until 0900 hrs. The following data was compiled: • 0700 - 0730 48 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed - 23 mph, Fastest speed - 37 mph. L • 0730 - 0800 77 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed - 22 mph, Fastest speed - 39 mph , • 0800 - 0830 52 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed - 29 mph, Fastest speed - 38 mph • 0830 - 0900 35 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed - 19 mph, Fastest speed - 37 mph Officer Sanders returned to the same location, starting the survey at 12 noon, and ran it until 1430 hrs. The following data was compiled: • 1200 - 1230 23 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed - 17 mph, Fastest speed - 38 mph • 1230 - 1300 49 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed - 19 mph, Fastest speed - 37 mph • 1300 - 1330 42 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed - 19 mph, Fastest speed - 32 mph • 1330 - 1400 29 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed- 26 mph, Fastest speed- 40 mph • 1400 - 1430 30 vehicles clocked, Slowest speed - 17 mph, Fastest speed - 36 mph The data from the radar trailer also shows a large number of vehicles use the same roadway between 1500 hrs. and 1830 hrs.. Officer Sanders was unable to return to that area during that time period. It is planned to resume the survey on Wednesday 10/08/97. If you have any questions you can contact me at extension 838. Rd/rd cc: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety L 10C-2 From: Russell Daniels Sent: Tuesday,June 02, 1998 9:11 AM To: Gary Gregg Cc: Barry Hinkle Subject: Timberlake Sub-Division Traffic Report Wednesday May 27, 1998 1800 to 1930 500 Timberlake Drive(south bound) 225 vehicles recorded. Speeds ranged between 14 mph to 45 mph. Ss 10 to 20 range 16 vehides(highest 20 mph) 21 to 30 range 181 vehicles(highest 30 mph) 31 to 40 range 27 vehides(highest 37 mph) 41 to 50 range 1 vehicle(highest 45mph) Thursday May 28, 1998 1830 to 1930 Timberlake Cir. 145 vehicles recorded Speeds ranged from 16 mph to 41 mph. Speeds • 10 to 20 range 9 vehicles(highest 20 mph) 21 to 30 range 105 vehicles(highest 30 mph) 31 to 40 range 30 vehicles(highest 36 mph) 41 to 50 range 1 vehicle(highest 41 mph) Friday May 29, 1998 0700 to 0900 500 Timberlake Dr. (south bound) 51 vehicles recorded Speeds ranged from 20 mph to 38 mph Speeds 10 to 20 2 vehides(highest 20 mph) 21 to 30 47 vehicles(highest 30 mph) 31 to 40 7 vehicles(highest 38 mph) The traffic survey will resume on June 10, after this weekends race events. L 10C-3 City of Southlake,Texas ORDINANCE NO. 707 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18, "TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES", OF THE SOUTHLAKE CITY CODE; DESIGNATING THE SPEED LIMIT WITHIN THE TIMBER LAKE AND SOUTHRIDGE LAKES SUBDIVISIONS AS 25 MILES PER HOUR; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 169 of Article 6701d,Vernon's Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.,the City of Southlake, Texas has the authority to establish prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speeds within its corporate boundaries for vehicles on streets and highways; and WHEREAS, the prima facie maximum reasonable speed limits adopted herein are not in conflict with any order of the Texas Transportation Commission declaring speed limits along any roadways within the city limits of Southlake; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. That Section 18-79 of Chapter 18, "Traffic and Vehicles," of the of the Southlake City Code is amended to read as follows: The prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speed for travel on the portions of the streets or highways designated in this section shall be the speed in miles per hour(mph) designated 8-13-98 Page 1 tot •y i as follows, provided that an appropriate sign giving notice thereof is erected: L Street Speed Limit(mph) North White Chapel Boulevard from F.M. 1709 to the north end of White Chapel Boulevard 40 F.M. 1938 (Davis Boulevard) from mile point 0.000 south 0.892 mile to mile point 0.892 45 Streets located within the Timber Lake Addition, including Lake Forest Dr., Edgemeer Ln.,Edgemeer Ct., Shorecrest Dr, Parcrest Dr., Elmbrook Ct., Shorecrest Ct., Parkdale Dr., Windmere Ct., Timber Lake Cir., Winding Creek Ct., Shadybrook Ct., Glenbrook Ct.,Brookdale Ct.,Woodcrest Ct., Shadow Glen Dr., Timber Lake Dr., Timberlake Way.,Ridgedale Ct., Timbercrest Ct., Brook Meadows Ct., Lakehurst Ct., 25 Ce Spring Brook Ct., Woodglen Ct.,Parkdale Ct. Streets located within the Southridge Lakes subdivision, including San Jacinto Ct., Sabine Ct.,Donley Ct.,Irion Ct.,Valverde Ct.,Gregg Ct., Pecos Dr., Houston Ct., Liberty Ct., Concho Ct., Coreyell Ct., Stonewall Ct., Crockett Ct.,Bosque Ct.,Brozos Ct., Sterling Ct., Presidio Ct., Blanco Ct., Bowie Ct., Travis Ct., Brazos Dr., Loving Ct., Bandera Ct.,Llano Ct.,Kleberg Ct., Southridge Lakes 25 Pkwy., St Augustine Ct. SECTION 2. CUMULATIVE CLAUSE This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. 8-13-98 Page 2 10 SECTION 3. SE VERABILITY CLAUSE. (ihre It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable and if any phrase, clauses, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in its ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 4. PENALTY Any person, firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects,or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. (so, SECTION 5. SAVINGS CLAUSE All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Chapter 16 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake and Ordinance No. 337, or any other ordinances affecting refuse which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances,same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 6. PUBLICATION The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of 8-13-98 Page 3 1 its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and Co, penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L 8-13-98 Page 4 1p C. �1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance appeal for a sign at 2100 W. Northwest Highway, Park Place. Cencor Realty Services manages the Albertson's property on N.W. Highway in which the building is in the confines of the Grapevine city limits and a portion of the parking lot for this business is in Southlake. They have requested a business sign and we have denied that permit because our ordinance requires that a sign may only be permitted on a"site" defined as a lot, tract or pad site. The denial is referenced more because the building is in one city and the sign would be in another city. Mr. Michael J. De La Vega is appealing the decision of the Building Inspections Department with the understanding of the city limits issue, however, he would like the City of Southlake to use a single lot interpretation. If not for the city limits issue, the sign would be allowable by ordinance. Attached is a memo from Plans Examiner Charles Bloomberg, a letter from Mr. Michael J. De La Vega, and the application for sign permit, along with several site plans and a description of the sign. If you have any questions,please contact either Paul Ward or me. 0,2 BC/bls Attachments 10D-1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 7, 1998 TO: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety FROM: Charles Bloomberg, C. B. O., Plans Examiner SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance appeal re freestanding sign at 2100 W. Northwest Highway I received a permit application from Rick Sutton of Starlight Sign Co. and an appeal from Michael J. De La Vega of Cencor Realty the manager of the property. The application is for a freestanding business sign on the property in front of the existing Albertsons store. The permit was denied although section 19-A would permit such a sign because the definition of a business sign under section 1-A states it shall be "on-site". Further the term "site" is defined as a lot, tract or pad site. Separate plats have been filed in the cities of Grapevine and Southlake for the portions of this center in the respective municipalities. This appeal is made under section 16 as an appeal of the decision of the Building Official as opposed to a request for variance under section 17. The basis of the appeal is the lot line that separates the Southlake Lot from the Grapevine lot is artificial and for all practical purposes this is one property that just happens to have a city limit line run through it. Please schedule this item for the August 18 City Council meeting. xc: Paul Ward, Building Official L:\BUILDING\CHUCK\ParkPlaceSign.doc L 10D-2 CENCOR REALTY SERVICES Michael J. De La Vega Development Associate 0 8-0 7-9 8 P 0 224 RCVD de/avega@cencorrea/ty.corn August 6, 1998 Mr. Chuck Bloomberg Plans Examiner City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Park Place Shopping Center Dear Mr. Bloomberg: In hopes of expediting our request to install a "free-standing" sign, along the Park Place Shopping Center frontage located on State Highway 114, I have submitted the following items to assist in the approval process. Provided is a copy of the Surveys for Lots 1 and 3, a site plan showing Parcel 1 through 4, an application, and a drawing of the proposed signage. Although this property is situated in the City of Southlake and Grapevine, the property lot has been viewed as one lot by the City of Southlake and Grapevine for everything except taxes. We also request that the City of Southlake allow us to submit our sign application using a single lot interpretation. Please review our application and respond at your earliest conviencne. Sincerely, '"- Micheal J. De La Vega Development Associate Enclosure 3102 Maple Avenue Suite 500 Dallas,Texas 75201 214/954-0300 FAX 214/953-0860 www.CencorRealty.com Cencor Realty Services is the management and development division of Weitzman Management Corporation,a regional realty corporation which also does business through its brokerage division,The Weitzman Group. 10D-3 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT outhla Q CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 08-07-9 8P02 17 RCVD DATE : 8/7/1'8 ADDRESS OF PROJECT ooIO° &. N IIW 13 �Du f 11 )aja ,T4 PROPERTY OWNER l ?b1G77 1iL f1!4 IT/3 ADDRESS 5102- m4 ntt- TENANT Pcok ()lace 5 c PHONE NO. SIGN COMPANY (INSTALLER) SfaA tA 6) CO PHONE 81 -413b'835C? ADDRESS 79Z3 MG n'4if CITY �&)- T'1 ZIP 7620g ILLUMINATED? OP NO (CIRCLE ONE) Attach Electrical Permit ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR PHONE NO. (16.„'YPE SIGN PERMANENT SIGN TEMPORARY SIGN STRUCTURE CATEGORY CATEGORY ATTACHED k BUSINESS BANNERS, PENANTS MONUMENT MENU BOARD & STREAMERS X FREESTANDING SUBDIVISION ENTRY BALLOONS GROUND _DIRECTORY _MODEL HOME OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE _SEARCH LIGHTS _CONSTRUCTION OFF/ON SITE 73 >> DEVELOPMENT SIGN AREA: HEIGHT 135g FT. X WIDTH I ZI FT. =AREA /06 Ct SQ. FT. OVERALL HEIGHT 20/ FT. SETBACKS FROM R.O. W. 15' FT. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: ✓Plot Plan "Sign Drawing Letter from Property Owner(off site signs) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ****, ******, ***************************, ***** ******************************************** -- PERMIT LAPPLICATION APPROVED BY: DATE: FEES: COMMENTS: 10D-4 •• , I • . . L _•GEVATI110E1 )1ilid ... .- - —.. , , . 7_71 ( .... .‘./-777Z-7—k`• , , sc\--,\ . : .< ,_,..:--- . ' ' . " ' ' . • ' . . . • ) ri—,..,,..._— . 1 : i ; i Iliii ; li : —, ',.\\,, .. ‘-..','.‘,. . .... \ • r.--- 1 =\ ____ __......_._ ___, .„-‘, . .. . , „ ,,,, .., _,, + ! I ,...= ,_.' ,-;, „'vW -, • = s if....!s; ' \‘‘,i. 2 •El Al Li 4! 2. = cle—.. \ ',A\Ni ‘ --1 I '— -\s . \ \ .• -- —. d I... s ._:—..L a FT:- ':, -• • ...s....‘,,-\\\s -_-_-_: lb, 0,.. . .714 i....'";i -1 g -- • = — ! 1 E.. •.- ' ' - -----lig- i L 7.: i'• - \•-•\\.'\ '' '' :-: I .-.,- . i f..! 1 . 1 . , MI -- •I•• '"\. ,‘.' \\\ r-•17--, . rn",' , , II 7 i ( , --- y ,.. — / —. 7 . \IL, ,...;,,\VA., , ..._. 1 , , . 1111. 1i • td — - ‘, '. - N. . .'• \ , ,\'',\.V' L .N , '* .,s* .` —77711,1\I I \Tim ,, --, \, ,,.‘,\•,,,\N\ , \V: .\ \ \\.,\.,, \• _ , --) i. ,,, \\ \\.- '' ' \\N''\\\i\-:\ \ •\ A \>i \\ \' l\ -\X\ / I\s',A\\ , .\\\\.,„::, ., \s La = \\ ., ,\\:k‘\ / i '•\ kN, \ ' ' 1 , \ '‘. 1, ' • \ N`..\ '}6-\ \'‘‘‘\\‘\ \\ \ 1 1 \ \‘'. \•,- .‘,,, ...;.. ' .\ \\\• ,••••.,. sks.N \‘..,‘\ ,\\ a m .\\. v‘s. -\\\:7_,,_ ,... \ \ .\-\ ,-,. - Ns,. - , •-• - - - . N .. \ A\• • \.• ‘‘.\\C •\\\\ \ 5 ''•\\ 2-..\-,•-•\-,' .••\ \.- s '\.-\\,.-01•••••: •\--s -'. ....., /c4 I ‘ ‘\,,,k . \\•,‘\ \ ,,fr.0,,\• \ s :1‘\,,\-•. •\:\st.2.\,,s. , \,,,, , ,m.1.,.•,.,..\s,\ \:...,..,v•\.,,\ ..,,, . / / \:..!•'. < \•,..s \\,"(•:.1 .\\\s. .11\-\\I \,\\\\ s.'Nktgr\ . 's \\\4:4\ 1 C4/ \.\\ .• ‘sss \ C:5\‘.\4‘ \ E ‘'..‘2,\\ ‘•\•,• ••\s'•\.t \\\ :„. „ /,•.,.\: \•.: \s'\' ;‘ ,,,,\-,\s- \\ s s ,:• ..:-,-,'\ ',-, '',,-\ '.-:s• ••\ E—• 5 ( \ \ . ., \\,\ \\.: :,\ •,..„..„:•:,•,\,..\\\\\\ \,...\\ ,‘. .\••(--\•:.1z'''.; L...: , , t . ,• .. .. „ , 2, ... \ ,. , xi__,,s„.. .,.., ,..• ...., , (-•;:\ • 0; .,:,,I,•\,+.•• \ \-\-4\\• \ t: ; : \ , s \\\ L,',:ss s s\\\\•\\‘. . ,' \‘'I\, ',.. \, \s i Cr.,/ i ' 1 b„,‘• :,' ...\\\-,' \\.'\\ \'' ''‘`: ''''''''N', N\ ,', '\\I' s •'` '''. : ;1 ' ‘ ,._, .. s \\\.„,„N, .„\\\..,...,,„\N ....... \,‘ „\\..,,•\,„\\,,,,, „ s.:,.•,\„_,.t, ::. , \..:- i ,,z,,.. , , \ -1'--------\ ......,_ / ,...,, \''.,.\\•,__ . / —r , __\-1 ,. ./i .Z. =Cal 0.3 ‘..- , , , , ,,., . , ,s ! _I =4.1CL / 1 i ..., >-• <w 7\77:77.L.--7-,=1 '14 /W r- •,__.\ \\•,•s\s\\_, _ -:7- /...._E-./ < --, s x 0 La .. •-:-.. r.-. 1 \.\\\V \\ -7 \I\‘‘\'''.7.7 1:11---.---- tr/) .. • I \ \I I.1÷ \ \ i I I-Li _ il ! IIIII ! ! ! 1 , IIIII .11 ' ! 7;J r---- i (AY ...\ H La< 3--i 1 • -.. / CC C4 Ca 1.1i == ; if:: ( / {E.' ! 1 i-t- = 11 ; 11 ; ; IIIIII11,111 : 111111 ,....4.4 —,Ca3 0. 1 k---: i'5 - i 0 ix 0 I c` a < 0 0 _ Lii . , : h111111 ; ; 1111ii r.. 64 Z V/ N-- - I L.-..— 0 F. _J \ ,,..= 1 _ / ) ).- - 3.4. ,.. # 1 P :d CL rn wz • La cc R 7 •••• o A CC 00- 0_ cvc., 7 L 10D-S ) 1 J• E111TIMG T IC SIGNAL .....iiee ( PARK BLVD. i-- J 761..2 DNivE /• I OEVEL ►ER'• S`N 0 • CPARCEL 3 ... (- - It ,• - BLDG. AREA 'GT o ° .,� 22.000 5 F_ YA%. I F•y r ► • . 1I- _______ 1-�: L- — — -- -- —lnani` Ed o -" si I — . ‘I' <------. i M 2: 2sa.7e' � w w � Q di o \i o W = 3 a ea au Q _ 2 _ c. YS u_ � ° QiS E • = - _ •-. rVidj Si / /5 / . 1i. z L 1 .._ . . W O _ _ 0. O v✓1 1 i/ / , ` ' fig---S L�/`.L/�� n O -- -- o; Z-_-.— . • - o . -.7 .CO LIJ - ices.' - PL. :m o+c r ...2. . 7 411411, •AREA 'D� LDG �� a 4.500 S.F. MAX,. X� .- _F SITE DATA_--: I-- 1 vi - --L Z I - ___I I BL q AD.I AND OLDO. AREA LAND AREA • PARKING RCEL4 - - PARCEL 1 A7.2• 74.166 S.F. 0.46 ACRES 305 STALLS Q •Y PARCEL 2 .45 26.300 S.F.• 1.29 ACRES 92 STALLS "- �• — PARCEL 3 .30 22 000 S.F. 1.06 ACRES 97 STALLS a. • .PARCEL 4 •IS 6.29 ACRES 232 STALLS f.. LLI •• TOTAL__ ._. 39 106.565 B.F. 114.09 ACRES 766 STALLS 07 1 i SITE PLAN- +' GRAPEVINE , TEXAS. 7/16/84 • ; , 8/9/84 REVISED _ ' a = ••R / 0 26 60 100 VI I9 34 fACE12G.a 11 6E. E )( HIBFI 118 ' A' 1111Al. 10D-6 - — 1Z-0" 24" 14 Z — kb."' N i/� ` 7 i' I��_r�A �. In N ki _ N lc MINN INN 1 I I I I gm mom I ONN MN 1 r I I I II =, O I I I I I I=�— • I I I I IAmo-g• N �# I I 1 I I gE� riuNT4 I I 1 ■tl•�I II INN MINI OM LLTHLT.1_ 11_-- 1 _ _�1 1 1 1 I I I W1MM NM 9 1 1 1 1 =1 MO M1 1=1 I 1L -,,.- INN SIM II I I 1 1 �� 111111111M ON ..0111101 111 I I 1NI NM NM I I I I I �NM 1 1 I 1 N MI MN O I 1 -1� , 44$ us 11�R� mom Ems ON NMI OM 1 1 I 1 1 EOM o• I I I I I 11 I iit rim mom amme me I I I I I I o,NMI NIN■ I I 1 1 Ri NMI NO ♦ ♦ I 1 I I I I D/F PYLON SPECIFICATIONS: 1].090 24" Deep Aluminum Cabinet w/3" Retainers& Dividers to be painted 313E Dk. Bronze 2]Tenant Panels to be 3/16"Thk.7328 White Plexiglas w/Translucent Vinyl Graphics per Tenant Artwork 3]Cabinet internally illuminated w/ [12]96 f12 DHO Sign Lamps installed vertically 12"o.c.;Two Magnetek Ballasts#256-696-000 to 5amps each required =Total 10amps 4]Two 6-5/8"o.d. Steel Pipes required through brick Columns and Cabinet 5]Brick Columns to match Shopping Celli er Brick Total Square Footage: `i " . 1„all&a edSSatC eaotnsnts 8'-3"x 12'-O"= 99 Sq. Ft. U/L LABELS REQUIRED A.-----" cusyoRlEe Pork Place Electrical Requiremeni.s: LO AT1o11 2100W.NWHwy L. [1]20amp 120v circuit StarliteSign aI$!AT! SoutNake'II M3I.Mimi Wm,3I76708 MS Net Sutton 140)382.8850 lae(910)387-0419 APPROVAL swot# 9108-014 CUSTOMER WE yp,IpIN1011M1(..1�*brlr SCAU -=1' wIl •��wdM -- — --- 1 MIXORD DATE '�suwllsro otluR.ac. DATE M6.1991 OD-7 • LZ U n.)N L.r)N ^0 C C 0 CO N OO O t •'V'••.'• •O V O a0 O r A ,i2 N C)C 7 !qu v Il O y^O O v owea •` (n O t C V N en Lo . •__ 7.z.., E o U a., C Q O) H `c Y w v o U C t L. 10D-8 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 31, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance Appeal for a sign at Woodland Heights Addition, 1721-1725 East Southlake Boulevard. Attached is a memo from Paul Ward with the latest design of the sign at E. Southlake Blvd. and Westwood Drive. In viewing the design of the sign that they submitted, it looks as if they have not addressed their initial consideration of taking four feet off the north end of the sign,which clearly places a large portion of this sign in the site triangle. Also attached is my memo of July 17, 1998 and Charles Bloomberg's memo of June 13, 1998. If you have any questions, please contact Paul Ward or me. OC> BC/bls Attachments L 10E-1 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM August 11, 1998 TO: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety FROM: Paul Ward, Chief Building Official SUBJECT: Sign at 1723 E. Southlake Blvd. Mr. Patrick Mohahan of Bootstrap Investment has provided the information needed to consider the Variance request to remodel the monument sign located at the corner of E.Southlake Blvd. and Westwood Drive. This information provides more details of the actual tenant logo on both sides of the sign and a survey indicating the location of the sign as requested at the July 7, 1998 City _Council Meeting. The sign complies with the standards for a monument sign except for the 15 foot setback requirement. (spe Mr. Jerry Ringwald and Mr. Jim Munday will be present at the August 18, 1998 City Council Meeting to answer any questions that may arise. PW/jb Attachments: Survey and location of sign Sign Drawings Photos of similar monument signs Site plan 10E-2 City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Sign Variance Appeal for Woodland Heights Addition, 1721-1725 East Southiake Boulevard. Bootstrap Investment has requested a sign variance to allow a non-conforming monument sign to be remodeled at the southwest corner of E. Southiake Blvd. and Westwood Dr. The sign was originally constructed meeting the 15 foot setback requirement and not obstructing the sight triangle. However, the widening of Southiake Blvd. has removed approximately 15 feet from the front of the lot. The applicant also would like to turn the sign perpendicular to the roadway so that it can be seen by both eastbound and westbound traffic on Southiake Blvd. This request is to have relief from the 15 foot set back requirement. The issues are similar to the signs located on Myron Drive that Council approved several (roemeetings ago, however at Myron Drive the signs were in compliance, but were in complete disrepair. The Council was limited in its alternatives because of the state taking right-of way and the close proximity of the building to the right-of way. Chuck Bloomberg's memo outlined the issues of the Woodland Heights sign as they pertain to the ordinance. The following highlight some issues which should be considered: • Sight is limited at the intersection, but Ms. Monahan, the owner of Bootstrap Investment, had spoken to Chuck Bloomberg and offered to take approximately 4 feet off of the north end of the sign. This would help improve the impairment to the visibility triangle, but would probably not solve the issue entirely because the utility poles create more of a sight barrier than the sign does (especially if 4 feet was taken off of that north end). I observed the stop sign at East Southiake Blvd. and Westwood Drive for a period of time and the majority of the cars exiting from the Woodland Heights area pull past the white stop sign strip in order to get a better view because the utility pole on the southwest corner and the next utility pole west of this intersection does not allow for a clear sight. • We have suspended his permit for the existing sign because it does not conform with the original sign variance request. In the original application, they requested to move the south end of the sign perpendicular to 1709 parallel to Westwood Drive. Instead, they have moved the north end of the sign perpendicular to 1709 parallel to Westwood Dr. (.., This may have been done to protect the trees. Keith Martin has indicated that the way Mr. Monahan moved his sign was probably the least intrusive on the existing large post oaks trees. Keith has also stated that it would not be in the best interest of the trees to move the sign anywhere inside the drip line. 10E-3 Shang K. Yelverton Sign Variance Appeal July 17, 1998 (Hy Page 2 Staff offers no recommendation to this issue except that if the sign were to remain at its current location, that we accept what we believe to be as an offer to remove 4 feet from the sign length. As a side note, barring any engineering issues, the sight line could be dramatically enhanced by moving the white stopping strip approximately 2 feet forward from its existing position where the majority of the vehicles are currently stopping, we could leave the stop sign at its current position. Attached are Chuck Bloomberg's memos, variance applications, sign permits, and other materials pertaining to this issue. If you have any questions please contact me or Chuck Bloomberg. BC/dmj L L 10E-4 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM DATE: June13, 1998 TO: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety 11 FROM: Charles R. Bloomberg C. B. O., Plans Examiner SUBJECT: Sign Variance Appeal for Woodland Heights Addition 1721- 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Ms. Joan Monahan of Bootstrap Investment, owner, has applied for a variance to allow a non-conforming monument sign to be remodeled at the southwest corner of E. Southlake Blvd. and Westwood Drive. The original sign did not meet the 15 feet setback requirement of section 16 B of the Sign Ordinance. The sign was originally constructed meeting the 15 foot setback requirement and the visibility triangle but the widening of Southlake Blvd. took approximately 15 feet off the north end of the lot. Also it was placed at an angle facing northeast. The intent of the revision is to turn it perpendicular to the roadway so that it can be seen either eastbound or westbound on Southlake Blvd. A permit was issued based on the original application but was suspended when it was found to be not as represented in the application. The survey submitted did not accurately show the location of the sign. Also j Ls the proposal was to turn the south end of the sign leaving the north end in place. When they went to move ►e sign they decided to swing the north end instead because it would have less impact on the existing trees. his had the side affect of moving the sign closer to Southlake Blvd. The principal reason they applied for a variance rather than move the sign back is the sign would be much less visible due to the trees and utility poles. Also they have expressed concern that further excavation could kill one or two trees. The sign variance granted on the May 19 City Council meeting for the sign at Miron Drive and E Southlake Blvd. was also for the same setback issues and due in part to the widening of Southlake Blvd. The requested variance is to section 16-B (5) , the requirement to set back 15 feet from any property line, and to section 17-D, the prohibition of signs in the sight triangle as defined in the Subdivision Ordinance. The sign complies with the standards for a monument sign except for the 15 foot setback requirement. Mr. Jerry Ringwald will be present at the council meeting to answer any questions that may arise. The Monahans will be out of town but he is familiar with the situation. Please schedule this item on the July 7, 1998 City Council meeting. CB Attachments: Application form Original sign permit application and drawings Site Plan xc: Paul Ward, Building Official 10E-5 L August 10, 1998 Chuck Bloomberg Plans Examiner City of Southlake Southlake Texas 76092 Mr. Bloomberg, Attached you will find the following; 1. The survey and location of the monument sign 2. The artist's rendition of the sign 3. Photos of other signs in the area 4. Example of the sign materials We measured the final position of the sign, and it rests only marginally closer to the street then it did prior to the move. And as you know we attempted to do exactly as we had proposed in our request. Our tenants have lost their patience over the delay in replacing the sign. Please schedule us again for the City Council meeting. Telesupport will have both myself and Jerry Ringwald there to answer any questions. Jim Monday --\-N-y-\ cc: Paul Ward L 10E-6 1721 . 1723, & 1725 EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD Lioi F.M. HIGHWAY 1709 Found 1/2" 130' R.O.W. iron Rod 1 Uoum.nt \ MEAS — N89 44'24'E— 140.1 5' ' 71 87 45' 27" E 140.0' 1 4.91' Building Lino ___ PLAT = SOO'13'E—31.44' P.O.B. — --I MEAS = S00'23'09"E031.6' TRACT 1.00E ACRES 47.73a s0 Fr Found 1,Iron Ror 00 ago a+ N oa 11 t P I O 93% 4) •V. W O 3 O -!, ,„ . t O p�, n d O vi\ • O p c.. I� OD . ae %. 7 1 0 U N N �A N O 1. In ‘ i.1• %C tj1 w b tki`i \\ - 11S� ��11, O QcZ r—._.JIQa NG Z 50.2 N ,e!I P '0 L 11 to C !a l? %. 4c !n i N 3 v r-c� 0. en a e C![��• ' 3 .O n. � � � E9(...., �C yO•o— ' �G. fV d �...\ k•Sot s'Er N , ` , , Iran ifod 50.2ryl .tapp . 0 iron Rod \. \C n1f. '--1/4 *Na.I von V.I. \\ S89'32'W�97.22' °f' -a : /�- �� N89'32'E'—97.22'1 "f v '�• . , �01, P.O.B. t?� ..1` - e� I.‘: =' ��tn r • v. O O t.°� 'of . 10 '° N i �" �a a j a TRACT U •• s ��,, -A 0 3 1.143 ACRES fly !S •A `� 3 Co 49,77E 5O Fr �, tT 4,:' •" tr, ,,. D to CVO .. v •• ..-% O c. .119 Z ` i- \ Q va.v. • N it IL ,I ;n1 . \ C I co m 11• x --0- - -- -x- . _ - -{t (likko, . CI �T PLAT = S 89' 32' 00" W — 275.00' ' MEAS = S 89' 32' 11" W 274.63' Found 1/r Found t/r�, Iron Rod Iron Rod LOT 2, BLOCK WOODLAND HEIGHTS ADDITION 10E-7 FROM : P10 E NO. : 8174215782 Jun. 17 1997 01:34PM P7 !o "CAU- "C AU T I O N" UNDERGROUND LOT SSRI, BLOCK I UNDERGROUND PETROLEUM LINE CR( AND HEIGHTS ADDITION LINE CROSSING ' TE T INC. LOT IA, 131 0 ‘ WOODLAND HEIGH a w TELESUPPOJ STA. 14.25.00 LINE "A" 0 w\ CONSTRUCT STD. 4'DIA. MANHOLE 0 4 a CONSTRUCT 6" STUB-OUT TO SOUTH \ 04 FL. 6"LOUT)• 637.72 ‘ FL. 6"(IN)• 637.82 3 • TOP MANHOLE- 647.20' W k REMOVE AN EXISTING 24" uAK 2-10•' OAKS 24" 0•K 'CANTER EXIST. 8" H.I.P. GAS LINE AS BRICK SIGN 12�00 13•0O 1 •Od 1 •I Amr adAl i it 71-4.4,7 Zei - _LI r ...1_:N't!%1:07C21,0,11 u- . W G W -$I�,v- ► • f ` W LG G C C C G G G 1 L C Nire.E7 3'x •' INLET 'VC F.M. 1709 BORE 70 L.F. 6" PVC BORE 25 L 403.00 404.00 - 405.00 40t I ► 4- 4 1 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. —E/C E/C 1 E/C E/C- � E/C 1E/� G -G• G G C G SANITARY SEWER L 10E-8 . ,. 7-,• . . . - 7. , 0 ock • .: -,,.:.i., ...:- ,-• • -1 --- •.. , - ...- t - . ' • • .• _ ... - • •. • .' -i-t;. ;71 '/ : --• 's i/ t .... :.•": ':a ''.', ''. • ' If's-.731 r.'r • ,. , . .. • , .•04- • • . _if • N.. .10:4; . d' • i 4 ;-,- . ,e'- „41:,.•• ' , ••.,„,...... ••-- •,. ..0-,-,.' • • . . L .. . ....,. - .. _.. ....„ 4- 4: . ' • ' s 4* k) .., . ' . . .• ‘ 1,,t y •,..., . 4.• ' • • ... . t • • 7 - - . . . • - . . .. . i . -• -t'l.tei Y• F' : ' I., • . la, •:.• .:„.tik.-{,,,,,," t• . 17 47 . • 4 It.- I", - V ,., • ) s •i.i • ,,,...,.....:,.. - .:: • .-., .i • -,•...._-....,..,.,.,,•,•,-I.•-..,.,,*._1....,.4;,.4-,..•,,.,,•„.-•v I..._f;- .#.... •-',i,-.:,•.•.•••`'"-.:,-. '.,'-;-\,1.,•:/-,,1..\,6.,0,$._.%4._....E--.1,=..-...c..._.-..-1-- ..-1_:....N4..:.„._._..--N.:.-s-....d.,-..—oc..1.....,_..... ._ .._...•.• 31.1..'i• 1._:l1_,c:.--=.1,.t•-=_r—..7=a..—.c._._.T1"•-...-._:-.—.....":_.._.•-„.:1.*. 1 1-1a..•;1i1,, -1 0.-3:.711:1.._..-._Z'..-..c1-..•.. ". = ' ‘1 1..,11" 1s 111'1'1111. 111itt1itte1Pitit1l st\..-i, i1 illlI..•_:• .....i •:= T. sil, •.s:•- . . 2„.•... •. ... : , t • . ...,.•.., ... _,.. ...:. • • • ..:.r. :10.7A C.... ''......"." ., L ......._ _..._. -..-r: W.... --, ,...- %--"---;:- '111 ••• ".•i'l , • ---- \ 1 .• .. . • - . .._ . . , ...--.. ' 1 ' • ,',.X:. - .. - ...•-• ...... . • . CS4 •' %dm V 1....., 0 T gm•••• Claa, ...... CV: T. 7..... .. ,.. ., •••• ..0,40 •..,.',',.,41...4..1' •••••1 • f•. . .,, . , '*.:',', ...-1-', C:::::, •••• = 1 ••••11 -4...., ,•••••'.'"' = '----,:S--•', Lis• con = . 1 '"' , -:-,',1i3-.'' •••••••• ="' '.......'.'- Cms'e ••=1“.. CZ' ••••••...11 1.••••••0( C.,...; r..40r) +nom. a•iM.•=14 :.#n = 4••••I ;•1•1.1 mom. ;....". '= .,. 4. COO 1..... 0..... = -.0...., .. ;•°""• foam. i......4 -.4•• • II: . . , -.4+.... ..... •••••• •••••.I •,,,... . • •••••1 ..- 11; 2 n, a.... 64•••• •.4. vo • ......1 ,, g..r...1 • 41 AL .... - •. .,.. ''' -,'• -7...: I I . ...• • —•:, ..,,',•.- . •,-.-„, stiiiiirk 1 I V, It t'IVVIA ' * -.., . • ,....-; . . • c .... ii. italkilliik,Ra •-,1...' eip,%„: a -. .;.' ' • .--,,,,,...•.., - Fa-r r. i - i- : 2 ' , -s ' . 14)„' .L .,,...„..k . •'•t-li-7, .'•‘ - ‘" . . , 4 :...,:. ... a i ... ...,,,..:..-_- .. .„ .,.4„,•„,-.......±:-.:-•,,,,,t;.•,•:''.,.i''.- .,6.. . • : -:,:f.:•-•,::.,•••si.,,,,,..,Itihit,.,!.. .-.1.1/4 •--i-..:..•--: • ' a. 4! . ,..„.61,-.:•,.:, ... ••. ., . - . ' ..., 10E-9 JUN-09-1998 15:09 FROM CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO 4810204 P.02 CITY OF SOLiTHLAIO± February 6, 1995 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION (WII.ANq;i1 ;) APPLICANT OWNER fif dif. ) N.A.: Btic S "('ct p ZnV est- .ai--t- Lc k My,oc C&r ADDRESS: 1 q;) t ,-,k=1, 4 `7c 5 ?,C / EO 9a EIQD- E ccst South k €. El ud . Solit-An lake Ts 7(009 2._ PRONE L}I( _C)(oQ (v CO 1?) FAX: & ef -OfO9 flrpAi ..kAAy RinJe,W4c..D The foliowin information pertains to thclocation for which the variance is being refit epted: NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: POc)-}-s !Y-Q p in ' PETSICRL ADDRESS: 1 —*RI I�n�3 1 \c- .E.c st South 10 ke C\Q a . 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot ) Block 1 Subdivision i )-.4 (c i d ri ek h± S hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a (hweenresentative at the City Council meeting who is authorized to discuss this request, dress any unresolved issues, and approve cchanges, if/ any. Applicant's Signature: _ _ / ° /O-C/CL ,°'" Date: *********************** ********,r**************,►,r**************************************** For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the sign variance application and the applic:ion fee in the account of $ on this the day of , 133 . Signed: Title: **************************************************************fir*i************************ The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 506 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City gall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached.) Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan • (are shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R.O.W. Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs fo hic� d��a b�1ar' eis requested. For attached signs, the elevations sha sh ' cc form to the gt sign ter which the variance is requcstAd he , and any `J���si1a ITJ O or are exempt from the sign ordinance. V 10E-10 --Y•�*, .: By Demonstration Please demo ate that th following conditions are applicable to the regues.d sign variance: 1. That a 74 ..."-al enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. baCA.' wa c Ed �2cr not dezz 4-e) ...Qi1Ce, v;-, ,�� c�r,oC 7�or1 7L -�. , C 2. That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. 7h.e .. a GE,0-/-?.4.f. wa.e. - 1:0/-eztc, 1-ez uziocio 710 to M w� dzec ' oo oi ce. L 3 . That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. 7-e -‘2-C`5rn., L t U sedt9-77 ,&ea 1(, Gf Sei/Le C11,;,&;7,y. ,pe-e-e62 , 4 . That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. ..7-'11"<'-0 CAA0-6-40-441.._ fir077/1,)ne,nt Si9'71-J Y'hat G ` -r, 70e..._ ` `ezz Post=lt'Fax Note 767E °°°'G.q.11 Woo- t C:t FORMVA??s\si vad. WPO Ttjeki AfaV A d414/.. Ff0°'GNtick Cameo al -026 T Co. s. L 414 �c Phone* Phone* 10E-11 . L..........2.1 ic� IomI• oUtla - APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT , City of Southlake FEB Me U L --- ----_ DATE 2! f/ f 2 Q it BUILDING DES ADDRESS OF PROJECT J�f��l� T /72-4I ?Z3 b-c92-5-gAcagg TENANT / (( r-e vt a-,.-(71 $ PHONE NO. SIGN COMPANY Qom} r t• I ( v e vc tt-y PHONE NO. t 2-y' - 3 Z(f Z t1 /� ADDRESS 3?ZI Qr. (S wc�oGO !/f;ve / C1/RPe ✓.KF 1),. / ‘ec.--/ address city zip ILLUMINATED? YES NO (circle)pGA s E1cc wit( )o d1-,1 H.u�'"c..di°ems a ecell ler ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR • E1r ;ctt-t, I t. k+; 14-Y PHONE TYPE OF SIGN • • Permanent Temporary Dimensions ATTACHED BANNER h �p �� HEIGHT POLE BALLOON l6 •D �� WIDTH Le V .MONUMENT MODEL HOME V pi.Pi. AREA OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE DESCRIPTION �,4-<<i j J-2 ire-,,,„} 7e.J OVERALL HEIGHT (attached, pole, monument) 4. o SETBACK(S) FROM R.O.W. 67i— IO. �[.t rL e - yD p ve 'v S.c 7i-kezt k DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: jPlot Plan ,,,Sign Drawing Letter From Property Owner Elect ' ian Registration SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT t?Z-1 ***•********************************************************* ***** APPLICATION APPROVED BY: C., .. DATE: a - '7 — / d PERMIT FEE ,-/f. ir 96. c° COMMENTS 10E-12 (Ilia■le -I I- I 1 I 1 -_TI ---r-- I . i_._j 1 1 1 ( ' - I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I - I I I I J_. I _ I_ 1 _ �_ 1 I I . 1 • I i I I I I 1_. I. . I 1 I I I --I 1 1 I- 1 I 1 6 - �I I I I--- I 1 -- I _ L _ I--1 _ 1 1 _ -I . .I 1 I I I _ i- I - I 1-_ -L—I- r_-- 1 I 1 - _I-T- L_ I I ( _ 1 1 .-. 1 1 1 L--1---I- I , I 1 1 I _1 I 1 I 1--� : ( - ( __ -_1-- _i_ :-L._•___i_____=r_--_-I __ _ (/vooJ /a hc- f/ esr3A-f5 0-cr ce Pcvk ._ ---5-1yAJtiruGt (Are 44OhI,c..o-I �evtt He 6 0/ �� 4reet. o , 51. 1 n ; '74 s r `6 0 x 16 '62 Lime 10E-13 it x . f f • Ir.. J y C C+ fi It.' t .s 411' i g _- 4..,t''',, .''''''"Z' H j t..' V , } e G x ,s y' ! �y�. i. 4 �� ' x et. O j = 4.� , j _j I O "st _ O ii 1111 ! va a= — i- vi f 3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shelli Siemer, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with the City of Grapevine for library services The City of Southlake began contributing to the Grapevine Library in 1991, when Southlake entered into an interlocal agreement to contribute an annual sum to the library system for the purchase of books. This action plan proposed by the first Leadership Southlake class helped establish an official relationship between the two cities for library services until such time that Southlake could build a separate facility. Over the past seven years Southlake has contributed $72,500 which Grapevine has used to purchase 4136 books for the City of Southlake. Over the past year there have been many discussions about the direction Southlake should take in providing library services to its citizens. In February the City Council indicated that they did want to continue to participate in the Grapevine Library System until a stand-alone Southlake Library could be established. It was recognized that the participation cost would be much greater as it would be based upon the number of users and not simply a contribution towards the purchase of books. On February 17, Resolution 98-11 was passed in which the City Manager was authorized to pursue discussions pertaining to Southlake's participation in the Greater Grapevine Regional Library System. It is recommended that Southlake continue to utilize the current Grapevine Library, and to be a member of the Grapevine Library System, and begin to contribute a fair share of the operating expenses. The new interlocal agreement reflects the new parameters of our participation including a fee structure of $25.00 for each library card issued to a Southlake resident. Currently, the City of Grapevine has over 7,000 Southlake residents who have library cards in the Grapevine Library System. It is not known at this time how many of these cards are active, due to limitations of their computer system. In 1997, over 100 new library cards were issued to Southlake residents every month. Grapevine will be installing a new system in October or November, and will be able to ascertain how many of the cards are active. Please place this item on the August 18, 1998 City Council Agenda for consideration. L 'OP • STATE OF TEXAS § INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR § LIBRARY SERVICES COUNTY OF TARRANT § WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the parties herein find the following Interlocal Agreement (the "Agreement") to be in the best interest of the citizens they serve; and WHEREAS, Article 3, Section 64 of the Texas Constitution, and Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code authorize Cities in the State of Texas to contract with one another for the performance of various governmental functions and services, including those in the area of public libraries; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake and the City of Grapevine pursuant to the Constitution and the laws of the State of Texas desire to make and enter into a contract where by the City of Grapevine, Texas, will make available to the City of Southlake, Texas, library services for the education, recreational and informational needs of its residents; and WHEREAS, each party is authorized to perform the services contemplated herein; NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: In consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Southlake, a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County, Texas, INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT- Page 1 ("Southlake") and the City of Grapevine, a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County, Texas, ("Grapevine") do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. 1 That all matters stated in the preamble are found to be true and correct and are incorporated with the body of this Agreement as if copied in their entirety. 1.2 Until termination of this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 2.1 hereof, Grapevine shall make its public library facilities available (the "Grapevine Public Library") to the citizens of the City of Southlake on the same basis as the citizens of the City of Grapevine in exchange for the compensation defined in Section 1.3. All rules, procedures and fines will apply equally to the residents of Southlake and Grapevine. 1.3 The City of Southlake shall pay to the City of Grapevine $25.00 for each library card issued to Southlake residents. Term 2.1 The Agreement shall last for a period of one (1) year from the date of execution. The Agreement can be renewed annually by mutual agreement of the parties. The Agreement will automatically terminate thirty (30) days after the one year anniversary date of the Agreement, or any extension thereof, in the absence of a renewal. 2.2 Upon termination of the Agreement, all books purchased by Grapevine on behalf of the city of Southlake pursuant to previous agreements INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT- Page 2 shall be transferred to Southlake. Miscellaneous 3. 1 The Agreement may be amended only by mutual agreement of the parties in writing. 3.2 It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of the Agreement, no party waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions. 3.3 The Agreement may be signed in multiple counter-parts and shall be binding on each city when duly authorized by the governing body of each City and executed by each City's duly authorized representative. 3.4 This agreement contains all of the agreements made by and between the parties hereto. 3.5 In case any one or more of the terms, sentences, paragraphs, or provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other term, sentence, paragraph or provision hereof, and this Agreement shall be constructed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had ever been contained herein. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT- Page 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement to be effective upon execution and dating by each City. APPROVED BY THE CITY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ON By: By: THE HONORABLE THE HONORABLE WILLIAM D. TATE RICK STACY MAYOR MAYOR Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of City Attorney, City of Grapevine, Texas Southlake, Texas INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT- Page 4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Proposed paint concepts for the Miron elevated storage tank Staff has conducted several public meetings to present different paint concepts for the proposed Miron elevated storage tank. Prior to taking action, it is suggested that City Council have the opportunity to provide input and discuss the different options. The CIP budget provides $185,000 to paint the tank similar to the existing tanks at Bicentennial Park and on N. White Chapel and Dove St. An additional $150,000 has been budgeted for any other type of paint or architectural enhancements. Two SPIN meetings have been conducted for public input from residents near the tank site. Residents of SPIN No. 3 requested additional ideas after the first presentation and during the second meeting appeared to be divided as to the final selection of a concept. Residents of Oak Tree Addition requested to have a separate meeting to review the design concepts but never contacted staff to do so. Several proposed paint and enhancement options will be presented to Council during the meeting. Please place this on the August 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda as a discussion item. BW/cre Attachment: Proposed Cost Estimates Proposed Enhancements 11B-1 AUG. -14' 98(FRI) 11:01 LANDMARK TEL:817-439-1888 P. 001 ce_ LANDMARK 1665 Harmon Road Fort Worth,Tams U.S.A.76177 Tel:(817)439-8888 Fax:(817)439-9001 August 14, 1998 Sent Via Facsimile 265-8532 • • Original to Follow by Mail Cheatham &Associates 2011 E. Lamar Blvd.,#200 Arlington, TX 76006 Attn: Mr. Eddie Cheatham, P.E. Re: City of Southlake 1.5 MG Elevated Storage Tank 1 Dear Sir: We received a plan of architectural enhancements for the elevated tank from Arthur Weinman (copy attached). Our cost for performing this work is $278,700. Please let us know as early as possible if the City of Southlake plans to proceed • with this, since it affects the plate purchase on the steel tank. Yours truly, LANDMARK - S, INC. Chris Lemon, P.E. /kmc Attachment cc: Mr. Sean Poe,City of Southlake Ph:481-5581 ext. 846 Design Innovation.Constnic'_'en Einerence 118-2 Ala -14' 98(FRI) 11 :02 LANDMARK TEL:817-439-8888 P. 003 AUG-13-90 03124 PM WEINMAN ARCHITECTS 017 737 0977 P. 02 41 i (111" at SS I 1 4.rf GPI A,1rvf 2-"A ~4 II t. se coo e,..."1.04" „.......,.........,....-r---, -4 ----e---- Jo:Ap__"--- .., Yrd e 1.--`41 ,,,.i 1" . T akirr- \ r( ,..*, - ---,.--- I':. Rik 1' bY 0 '-'1 ow . .1.1‘, , Ii 1 ---- _ ..,. -,. f \\ 7,72-7,:-.-,,, eedoshwie - . \ // , . i ••TT�ry ,.A„, ~ 1,k :7/ ' , , , , ,,.A. 4 , ,:,- \\\\*, ,. ,,,,/ ., ,I" GUI t.. ) 1 e rj%/Y.: i IP"' . 6„....�� 1,140s04.110 , liairiiippli11161/1111(14 Siti 1 Ay1 G _ ' „ Ank.‘,. ,_-118-3 kUG. -14' 98(FRI) 11:01 LANDMARK TEL:811-439-8888 P. 002 AUC-13-98 •Z:24 PM WEINMAN ARCHITECTS 017 717 0977 P.01 i • ARniuRwEnsafAN ' ARCHITECTS Ern oA�*c 1 fF17t>•emus 1'e11• FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: 6l!3ifg Time: Project: &col/A-tails po u t To: e,-.ft"-sS I-0 Ag-aAi Company: 4,02Nvo... :1"x. Phone: FAX: 17 7. OG/ • From: A /✓•) GtiJ..4,41M AoU Phone: 817-737.0977 FAX: 817.737•2203 Pages (Including this cover page): 2 COMMENTS: f .' "-" 4 fi64,4 L- 4 ited AA.tt i 7 044 &seri 4 �f to C4 • • Hard copy to follow: fim (no) 118-4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 706, an ordinance amending Chapter 16, "Solid Waste" of the Southlake City Code, related to commercial and construction garbage. Attached is a draft ordinance amending the City's previous garbage collection ordinance passed in 1986. It is a redline-strikeout version of what is presently in the City Code. The amendments specifically address two issues. It first designates the City's contractor for residential waste as the only permissible collector for commercial and construction sites. Secondly it requires that all commercial and construction sites to use non-disposable containers. Although the ordinance itself is quite straightforward, there are several ancillary issues which must be considered. These issues pertain to the necessity for a revised site plan to place a dumpster on a lot. First it means that there will be a significant number of companies which will have to have their site plans re-approved through the standard process. The second issue, which compounds the first, is that many of those businesses, which do not have dumpsters, were built prior to the passage of the corridor overlay plan. What this means is that they also do not comply with many of our current requirements for landscaping, buffer yards, setbacks, etc. In resubmitting, they will either have to comply with the new restrictions or have variances granted. C /C-/ ORDINANCE NO. C' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16, "SOLID WASTE", OF THE SOUTHLAKE CITY CODE; REQUIRING COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES TO OBTAIN REFUSE COLLECTION AND CONSTRUCTION WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES FROM THE CITY CONTRACTOR; AMENDLNG THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTAINERS FOR COMMERCIAL UNITS; ESTABLISHING COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE FROM BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR PROPERTY CLEAN-UP; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code: and WHEREAS, the accumulation of garbage and refuse on the premises of commercial if businesses, and in the streets of the city constitute a public nuisance. and greatly increases the danger of the spread of disease; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to adopt regulations governing the collection of commercial and construction refuse to protect the health and safety of the citizens of the city; and WHEREAS, the city council rinds that it is in the best interests of the citizens to adopt regulations for the collection of commercial and construction waste; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. That Section 16-31 of Chapter 16, "Solid Waste", of the of the Southiake City Code is amended to read as follows: "Sec. 16-31. Definitions. The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. (7-31-98) Page l ///� _ 7 • • Brush means tree and shrub limbs. branches and other trimmings which are not easily placed in disposable containers or which exceed four feet in length and six inches in diameter. C Commercial container means a metal container with adequate capacity to service the garbage and refuse needs of a commercial business. City contractor means the person. firm. partnership. or corporation performing commercial refuse collection under contract with the city. Commercial unit means a structure or building other than residential, including a business or institution, and any residential building_containing more than four dwelling units. Debris means dirt, concrete, rocks, bricks, or other waste building materials. Disposable container means a-arty plastic bag, cardboard, metal, or wooden box, having no outside dimension of more than four feet and capable of containing garbage or trash,without leaking or emitting odors and which weighs, when loaded, less than 50 pounds and which is placed at street side for removal. Garbage means decavable waste such as animal or vegetable matter, as from a kitchen or food processing facility, ashes, or any other household waste which is damp or capable of emitting noxious odors. Refuse means garbage, rubbish. paper, and other decavable and nondecavable waste. (1,,,e including vegetable matter and animal and fish carcasses. Rubbish means nondecavable waste. including. but not limited to debris. brush. grass clippings, leaves. paper. and other household trash. Trash means rubbish all t`.fu3e other than garbage, b __ho1 a Fumi u_c _ _a applianec ; tra.3h 3ha11 irti.lude gras.3 clipping3, lcave3, paper and other hou3chold tra3h cxci:pt a3 incl..�ied in the definitions eentaimNi in thi3 cation." SECTION 2. That Division 3 of Chapter 16, "Solid Waste", of the Southlake City Code is amended to read as follows: "Division 3 Collection of Commercial and Construction, Waste Sec. 16-76. Duties of owners of commercial units. C.,, La.1 City contractor. The owner or person in control of a commercial unit shall make arrangements with the city contractor for the collection and removal of refuse from the commercial (7-31-98) Page 2 //e -3 • unit as often as necessary to maintain the premixes Free of accumulation of refuse and to prevent refuse from being carried off the site by wind, rain. or animals. Lb1 Commercial containers. The owner or person in control of a commercial unit shall cause refuse to be placed in a commercial container supplied by the city contractor that is of sufficient size to accommodate the refuse produced on the premises. The city contractor shall supply commercial containers that are; 111 equipped with suitable covers to prevent blowing or scattering of refuse; (2) maintained in good repairs appearance, and in a sanitary condition: and clearly marked with the city contractor's name and telephone number in letters not less than two inches in height. .(c_i Placement of container and refuse. The owner or person in control of a commercial unit shall cause: (1) the commercial container to be placed at a location on the premises which is accessible to the city contractor and approved by the city; (2) all refuse from the premises to be placed in the container: and ( _) the cover on the container to be kept shut to prevent blowing or scattering of C. refuse. al Container access. If the commercial container is enclosed by fencing or other screening, the owner or person in control of a commercial unit shall provide an opening of adequate size for container access. If a gate is used, the owner or person in control of the commercial unit shall ensure that the gate is open for easy access by the city contractor on the days collection is scheduled and closed once the refuse has been collected. L1. Cans and disposable containers. Cans and disposable containers are not permitted for commercial refuse unless by special permission of the City Council. Sec. 16-77. Exemptions for certain commercial units. (a), The owner or person in control of a commercial unit may apply to the city council for an exemption from compliance with the requirements of Section 16-76, if the commercial unit: L i) does not generate refuse: or (?) contracts with a private janitorial service that removes refuse from the site. Sec. 16-78. Waste from construction, remodeling, and property clean-up. ci . . (7-31-931 Page 3 ///--- 'rubbish resulting V ` -1i Debris or r bo sultin� from cpntitruction,remodeling,and repair.major clear?-up of property. general clean-up of vacant or improved property just prior to its occupancy, or from sizable amounts of trees. refuse. or debris cleared from property in preparation for construction will not be removed as a resalar service provided by the city contractor. Col Debris or rubbish described in Subsection (a) must be collected in a commercial container which is located on the job site at all times. The container must be of sufficient size and design to prevent materials from being blown out of the container. The owner of the property is responsible for the cost of the container and having debris and rubbish removed by the city_ contractor. Lc.i The collection and removal of debris and rubbish shall be made as often as necessary in order to maintain the site free of accumulation of debris or rubbish. Sec. 16-79. Collection and disposal. Commercial units and construction businesses shall use the services of the city contractor for the removal of refuse and debris from their premises. Section 16-7c, Duet._,. of mcr . It shall be ti1: .iut!. of :he owner or person otherwise in charge ofeommercial, institutional or industrial Y:e ni3e3 within the city to eatise all garbage and trash aeeumalatei on 3uc1i prCmi3C3 or his desia nee. in disposable containers. if, in his opinion. Such disposable c0 ntainer3 will of create readily accessible to the collector and apprev ei by the city manager or his/her designs;. arranged 1:t': eery t e customer and collector, but subject to review t:,t th e cit:• at any t:i:le. Section c 77 Cha b (a) frequency of Lvl c ction. The collection and removal of garbage and trash from , , and trash. In this regard, garbage. except dry trash in contractor-3upplicd cvntaincr3, shall be collected not less than aec time each week, except for roll off containers which shall not 'be subject to this subsection so long as they anti. used solely for brush and dry trash. (b) CI: ge3. e n.mer.:ttl h-pc o_mta:n.:ri. Commercial. institutional. industrial and multifamily te3iderrt'ial cvmplcx etratomen may drapesc of garbage and trash by means of containers meeting city- speciticatiofts. The fair and reasonable charges for such shall be preseribcd by resolution adopted by the city caancil from time to time. ;c) .-Lltiittt)itrr! Lltz.re-s. Far other f' cs of ctrertai:icrs or services, rates snail be negotiatcd with t`e city contractor, st bjcet to the, approval of the city manager or hi3,herdesrgne.c." i'-3 i-931 Page 4 //e-i- SECTION 3. CUMULATIVE CLAUSE (be This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas. except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable and if any phrase, clauses, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in its ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. C SECTION 5. PENALTY Any person. firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits, neglects,or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Chapter 16 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake and Ordinance No. 337. or any other ordinances affecting refuse which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both Ccivil and criminal,whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted urtil final disposition by the courts. (7-31-98) Page S //c-6 r r SECTION 7. PUBLICATION The City Secretary of the City of Southiake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty. fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. (irpe . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY (7-31-98) Page 6 //e- 7 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM i I August 14, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Proposed Drainage Ordinance Revisions Council has expressed concerns with the current drainage ordinance as it relates to development and its specific requirements. Some areas of concern staff has heard expressed are: • Building in the floodplain • Timing of final drainage study (HEC 1 and 2) • Erosion control • Drainage from one subdivision to or through another • Sideyard/backyard drainage • Open ditch vs. pipe • Any other item which may "rise to the surface" to discuss this with Council for guidance to begin preliminary !I Staff would like preparations for a proposed work group to include members of Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and staff. Please place this on the Augu st 18, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda as a discussion item. BW/cre I � 11D-1 K CorrPosrrroN SHINGLE rYf? BRICK VENEER TYP. \ �•_•■•■•■.aiyaraar■•■•■+a•_■•■•a■r■v■•w�■•■•.,ra•�•r■■■r■:■r.•t•a■•�•■r■•■•■t•a+a■.�r■•.�. i,� _-.— � .. ■■■tuxx' ■�xmlw■ - we■ta■n _11M1■/m■' �•-} =-►-u � 1see L ��� r .2»,1.■� ■ - !/! !!/ mile : 1N �i� r 1 I ;.,f, ■os ■■ ._ m_ !1/ !!/ mil■ : i �■1eiir = mils- mn mmm ■■■ ■■� '' eNii ■�. �} _ . _ _- _ I�IilNiIIIININE11iN11��; �,• .. • � ... .. . 'rw■ w/wet � .. 1 ��f' i �' ' H . - ••• � :- ■■i1� wuwivwn � 1 ems, NORM & SOUM BLLVATX?N 84n & W&iT H"ATTJON_ SCALE: I'• 1333' 10' - -. CGY" 1PI�I r/G1N • • Pq EMR IANDSCAPE SUMMARY CHART LANDSCAPE AREA fi, OF AREA /N CANOPY ACCENT S+aA14e6 GRC(ND COVER ( Frl F cNT s SIDES rREE5 TREES (Sa FT.) REOUIRED 4 715 734 e 16 16 4V Mwv/Ew 4,73 75% 19 /6 76 472 I- A min/m o of 50% or all canopy tress planted on the sits Moot be 2' rn canner and _4oM must bs 4' in cal/par Thie ,ncluaes plantings In buFFeryardf as well as interior to the fits. ?- Accent tress a,e a 6' m/n/murrl he/ght rather than the 4' minimum height ae rarqu rsG by ordinance. NOTE: ENTIRE I"RCPOSEC) 61 TE 16 NEAV/L T' 1Lt�ODED. BUFFERYARD SUMMARY CHART LCGATION LEN; TH B;LFFERYARD CANOPY ACCENT FENCE / SCREENING wlcllaI - TYPE I TREES TREES 4--AGWT It 1-rATER/AL NORTH I�QU'IRED f76' � #' - A ? < 1 14 NOW RRL^vIDED3 !38' �' - 4 2 4 /4 NONE i EAST RE WILD 200, 3' - A 2 4 f7 NONE PROVIDED 17, ` 3' - A ? 4 j l7 NONE SourN REOUIlED l77' 5' - A 2 4 /4 NONE PI�vtDED l64' 5' - A 2 4 14 ' NOW 1 (LEST RE UIREC ?CAB' I,S' - A 1 4 /7 NONE PR0VIDED3 194' I a' - A 2 4 17 - NONE - I- A minim v of 5e% of all canopy trees planted on the bete mutt be 1' In callpW and 50% must be 4' In caliper Th/e /nCL4aes piantings In bur1-eryard6 ab well a6 Interior to the 6/ts 2- Accent trees area 6 minimum hs/aht rather than the 4' minimum hs/ght as required by Crdinares. 3- applicant requests relocation of the evFFdryard. 18.5' 35' .3-5 18.5 16-5 3.5 18.5' I PERRYiALLEN ADDITION L o r 1, BLOCK 1 ?®r ' i (APPROVED FMAL PL A * r ; ' — _-� EXISTING ZONED C3 - - A WIDE CC^MC►v ExisTA6 4004RD E. CARR JR �• LANC�q� I LAND USE DE8/GN4TION: RETA/L/ COMMERCIAL t .lGGE55 EASEPfEN� 24.7' !0' LANL'SCAPE VOL. C r PAGE 1490 5 Ft. U.E. 15, SIDE rvRD DRrCT ZONED AG. a R -ram $ DUILD/NG $ET BACK BIER T` PE 'B' 91?.4C' N CCd 00'2C' E L41•C u D�src■+�ca*lcw: �rv/t: core-rE�r.aL l21 !'t, Uf. I If �■ 1 1 w 11 w 1 1 w 11 w 1 1 w 11 w I I w 1 1 w I t w 1 I w 1 1 w 1 1 w I r w 1 I 11 w I I w I I r 1 1 1 1� I I w 1 1 am i 1 1N 1 1 w 1 1 w. 1 1 w I t w 1 I w, l 1 w t 1 1 1 w 1 1 or 11 w I 1 ■" 11 w 1 1 w 1 1. 1� 1 1 �1 1 1 It It am 1 I a 4 1 w to w t 1 w It w 1 1 w 1 I w if w I r w 1 1 w 1 1 wl 11 w 1 1 w 1 I w 1 1 w 1 1 w 1! w 11 I (w 1 I w 1 J w t 1 w 1 1 w 1 I 1 t (1 T 1 7 w I 1 1 1 w -- - ----- ----- IC' LAiN0 CAJ C LOT I-R -1, BLOCK I i 5 rt, uF � � � I. { � , Bt.�ER T•-P� ° �- 1 , m _ 1 -R-�' B �-- `- 'D- , LD J AO' LAN08CAPE TO I rJLrFFER TYPE F1' ; --- � �l �..-.,.-. - - I _---- ---------- -- -- - - ------ -------------- _ ANDREW L. IAMES JR AND WfFE Ex15rJnIG IR = i t5i t Ele TYPE ,' a j I , _ 1 I + L /NDA JAMES i �' LAND9CAPF �_ n I PHASE II , 1 PRASE I BAR ri 19E g, _j MEADOW OAKS SuBD 1 V/SlGlN - - - t { T __ _ _ __. EXISTING 111 V G _ { - - --- -- Fa ��� 5T•4TE OF 7,EXA8 I 4_ {' I rND/c aTES Cor*tio►vVOL 9804r PAGE 06 ! YOL 388-129 PAGE 39 �EXISTING ) fx/3r/NG %� �� , ff I - ACCE56 5•�3EMENT F/I?E' N1•"DRANT$ ! - F G . I I PRDR�STErD - T CZONED 8/ LAND u5E DESIGNATION: .,.e->IrNO- LOW DEN5/7? RE6/DENT/AL ---f --�- i --- �' r'~^ F NYDR4%t!3 -- - -BkjFF1, — ( 1 1 --- _ s aka+ ,o� a� - _ , _ . I R � / i 1 :e11 t 1 w I I w I 1 ! t s 1 f a I 1 rr■ 11 1 I�. 1 1 �. ► 1 r1• l t..rl+'a 1 1 I •tl l 1 tt,t. L► 11...r -� l ' -------'-'- --- ' I B JZC=1YARC 4 4" / 1 / l CA ✓ALL INC PROPERT/E5 L TD, I VOL . 12123 PAGE 218 DR T.C. T / ZONED C3 LAND USE DESIGNATION: MIXED 1® - G EXISTING N 8 UI �kIWI41'ry t' GENT�R L IVE - 24393' a ECd 007C' lJ N 89d 594m'U JTIL/ TY E agEEta`EF�NN' TSIFFER rYloE 4' ?3.1' ACCESS E•a$x!►/ D1/VEW4Y ►R�� = GCMG90C rt. I 'LOT -`R�-� I tl j ' l ". It - / '- --- - — --� -'r- - -- - - - � • f /�` - a + 1 r w.l� r I 4 Q 10 ; � 1 1 j ? 7' 1tlIDE CO'"1'1G14 T � �� + �• �, PHASE�+ jj�� 1CCFgS k� d$E7'>TE 111 �i -� -� ACCESS EASEMENT �C I } O 1 urxITr z46ET'►EN* \ i I li 'I Exfgrl � `% r� �I� / I IAM$ I l - / / UTILITY EASEMENT ^t r -30 O / _ - _--__ - -T-�-. 1. \� I • 10' LAND6C. IPE ` L IBE,�i" Y BANK ROGER GLENN W LL _ ! (UNDER CONS U"(` `vt,/ , ( - --t — - 1 % �ti+�ER TYRE r , ✓OL. 1????. PAGE 1970 f` .._ _ .T_____ 8+62. PAGE /6B5 .__� �_�._.- { - ; N AVOd 0?0' E sPac�s VOL. 11ZONED G2 � ZONED AG I LAND USE OESI57NAT/ON: MIXED a 2 1 j ; Lj 9' spacEs rrr D USE DE6/GNAT/ON: / lry}1v 1 SPACES LAN LOW DENSI7 RESIDENTIAL I u _ FI�LaE _ - -- la�+o 24�+v .� etc ,' ` LOT 3-R-2, BC1K I / ' LOT 3, BLOCK l - --- ' r .Y— �. PHASE N �; - PRo�osFD (PROPOSED) _ n BUILD/NG 6 r 1 - - 5TORT. 6,700 Sty. t_ , FL OCR Af�� 7r"E A —_ 9. ts' P.olaCSG t lJF � rJF r !' , {�- _ -- - ,I�•acee - ar4cEa 1 J E► C4_06uRE aP.lL�Za U)ITal 44:2 L GATES O y i0'LtWL5CA,AE -HAIiE_WRPT_AYCAPE\ �ppItS _ -- - - - -- -- -- -----------4_ _-j I-__omt---_0 � - ---- --- ------ -- - - - - ---------� l 1 I 01 LEGEND LANDSCAPE AREAS BU9�ER T ARDS ENTRANCES If EX176 rt0 BUILDING$ HANDICAPPED ACCESS ,4 /5L E5 I-IANC/CAPPED PAx4 $PACES POLE M C(ANTFD - PW-0451AW 900A-P/ LA "r (1DESAN To BE SM To Pat 1, 12C VOLT 12'- l4' 1-!T l ORIENTATION- FULL suRRotn1D covSRA<E i I w l l w l i r>• f l w 1 1 �1 1 w l l t■1■ l l wit w l i w l l t t Ter 1 1•tat► 14 a�Y r L 1 1 w 1 1 w I f w 1 1 fir, 1 1 w I 1 rtr I l r l t ia 14w'tM air 1'I w t r t► !' 1 �11� 1 ► ►III 1 /w 1/ •n� F w1 t) #► 1 }Iw l l tt� I t }* J t oIt I J •■A t b ►1 w► I w l► �`t w i...11 ■Its t f ► t sa ► t w 11 1 �'{ I I fit• i t 1 t 1'1 4 1 i a;r1�1�� $ rQ rF OF TEir 4s 11 I Yi �-- -_-� �1 - -- -, - 208.47' $ I „__ Er/STIIJCs EXlST'lvh, ni �dT ®i_38 G - - - - , - - - - { - - - - - - - - - '- D.Rr.C.r, 10 LANCSGAPE 5' LANOSCAI°E BUFFER TYPE B' BIF+ER T Ptr ti = 3' L-ANO CN°E ar 6ce YARD - ? 10 D1�41NAGE 6WLC1l 1 'JET BACK ` Ef3,gp-fElr'r L3GfFER rl'i°E :l' XVD/CATES :4' CGrr"1"lGIN , PROPOSED LOT 3-RA BLOCK 1 f i F' "' 'e ,,T' , - EASAENEYT GEORGETOWN PARK - - -- - r I-IARLEY E. 4 Cr4ZRLOTTE J. EATCN EM1L r 514ANKL IN O / -- --- / — - -- - \ r ? - l VOL. 12266. =4CsE l602 VOL- 8716. PAGE 764 1 / O ZONED AG LAND USE DE5IGNAT/CN: FIXED LAND u5E GES/GNATION: I"1/XED i i / 8 In 1 � I � ,- -- _�,Ir1 j `1, �. ! �► uy LOT 4 BLOCK 1 � - .; i PHASE IV 10 It. utlllty Easement 1 1 j ' ti (PROPOSED) r �' ' 1 - - ►-- ----� ----- - -- / w , �4 3 N ; I RrGl4r-Our oNL r I l 10 rt. UE. 1--- - ------ -- -- -- --- --- --{---------=F -------- -------- --- B LIiwIIanifI I►w11wt1�It"aIIom11�1f=611�11wIl�tl Mti0witaft1/�1►aw►►�Iraw itaw l/� / 33635' S 000 0/38' w � SITE PL4N l SCA_E• 1' ■ 4C _0' -- l0 EM1L r $NAAKL /N / WT 3-R-1, BLC C''K 1, VOL. 87/6, PAGE 764 i OR-T.C.T. ZONED ACs / I GEORGE TO" PARK' LAND 116E DESIGNATION: RETAIL/ COMMERCIAL ISOUTHLAKF, TARRANT CO., TEXAS APPLICANT. ,REAL TT" CAFITA , '-CRPORATION 9?0 S. Mdln St,, $vita 170 Grapev/ns, Texas 76051 Tel.: (8/7l 486 - 420C Fax: (8/7) 488-5?57 Q- GECR�sE" N ?`1QNTICELLO PAL;e� 92C a. Ma rr s t Suits 170 GraJ✓evrne Texas 7605,' � Tel.. '8171 488 - 4?00 CONSULTANTS: ArG^i t ec t GI v;; CeK ,4550C1A7ES INC. 4(,An CON&c T/l�s E^'GIJyEER� ?045 N Highway 360 94jrte 10160 92C s. Main St. Sl,Its !70 Grand Fralrie, TX. 7505C Grapevirs rBxae 76051 Tel.; /617) 640-01CO Tel.: ('8/7l 329-6990 Fax: (817) 633-33CO Fax: (8/7.)329-767! VIC]NrTY MAP s„ J J w PRQ/sCT LOCAM 1Y PREPARATION DATE 6/15/98 CITY CASE NUMBER. "ZA98—n" PFC''.. CHK1 -- 0 M • tr1 r \ O O V K A to < u^ an � < I.L. De C Z o < O ae u �o m REVISIONS 7/2//W _ _ JOB NO.: ISSUE DATE: 6A5/98 SHEET-IIVFI-O--------- 9M PLAN FOR IAT YR-1, BLACK I SHEET NO. A-1 i DP.r.`�'d;�G Fi E: 1:\G ORGE\PHr=SrS`'.Sitecity FDITOR: K.N. 3:34 P.PA. 07/20;`98 �RE'.`IOUS=DITOR: K.rd. 49 A.M. 06 8/98 D W'iG. FI -F SCAL F: 1 "=4C'