The URL can be used to link to this page

1992-12-15 CC PACKET MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORTS NOVEMBER 1992 ZONING 4A PARKS & RECREATION 4B STREET 4C WATER/WASTERWATER 4D BUILDING 4E PUBLIC SAFETY 4F MUNICIPAL COURT 4G COMPLAINTS 4H FINANCE 4I City of Southlake,Texas PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FEE REVENUE REPORT FOR. THHE MONTH ENDING 30 NOVEMBER 1992 ZONING $ 200 . 00 • NO. OF CASES (2 ) PLATTING 38,750 . 00 NO. OF CASES ( 6) SITE PLAN/CONCEPT PLANS . 00 NO. OF CASES SPECIFIC USE PERMITS . 00 NO. OF CASES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT . 00 NO. OF CASES MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 201 . 00 NO. OF RECEIPTS ( 13) TOTAL REVENUE $ 39, 151 . 00 TOTAL NO. OF RECEIPTS (21) 'V -/ 1 CITY OF SOUTIILAKE PARKS AND RECREATION MONTHLY REPORT NOVEMBER1992 92 91 CALENDAR YEAR CALENDAR YEAR # JAN-DEC JAN-DEC OCT-SEPT OCT-SEP1 THIS SECURITY LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEE MONTH DEPOSIT MONTH TO DATE TO DATE FY91-92 FY90-91 LODGE • REGISTRATION 200,00 300,00 100,00 345.00 200,00 470,00 175,00 RENTAL 80.00 ,00 ,00 325.00 110.00 355 .00 130,00 DALLFIELDS LIGHTS OALLFIELD 11 .00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 100.00 40,00 DALLFIELD 12 DALLFIELD 13 TOTAL 280.00 *850 .00 100 .00 670 .00 360.00 925.00 345.00 1TO DE REFUNDED. 4G-1 City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM December 08, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Street Department Monthly Report - November, 1992. The enclosed report details the Street Department activities for the month of November, 1992'. ' This report is to be included in the City Council packets for their December 15, 1992 meeting. MHB/ck 1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM December 08, 1992 TO: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works FROM: Brad Payton, Street Superintendent SUBJECT: Monthly Report for Street Department Nolvember, 1992. Description Nov. Oct. 1 . Tons of asphalt used a. Ultimate Petroleum Mix 0 0 b. Hot Mix Asphalt 0 30 c. Cold Mix Asphalt 250 150 2 . Lane Miles of Road Repaired 90 95 3 . Number of Street Signs Repaired or Replaced (all types) 16 14 ��. 4 . Feet of Ditch Line Cleaned and shaped 250 600 5. Number of Vehicles Repaired 0 0 6 . Row mowed in miles of streets 10 75 BP/ 1DIV °` City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM December 08, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Water Department Monthly Report - November, 1992. The enclosed report details the Water Department activities for the month of November, 1992 . This report is to be included in the City Council packets for their December 15, 1992 meeting. /05 MHB/ck `/ d'/ UTILITY DEPARTMENT REPORT MONTH November 1992 OCT. NOV. GALLONS PUMPED FROM WELLS 0 0 PURCHASED FROM FORT WORTH 46,473,000 28,714,000 TOTAL PUMPED AND PURCHASED 46,473,000 28,714,000 WATER METERS SET 35 44 NEW WATER TAPS MADE 2 4 VALVES REPAIRED 0 6 VALVES TESTED • 27 6 FIRE HYDRANTS INSTALLED 0 1 FIRE HYDRANTS REPAIRED 0 7 FIRE HYDRANTS FLUSHED 11 3 DEAD END WATER MAINS FLUSHED 35 30 WATER MAINS REPAIRED 2 1 WATER METERS AND SERVICE LINE REPAIRED 9 4 ' NEW ACCOUNTS 54 40 FINAL ACCOUNTS 49 43 LOCKED METER FOR DELINQUENT PAYMENT 11 11 PULLED METERS 0 2 METERS REPLACED 5 5 MISCELANEOUS WORK ORDERS 84 66 SEWER LIFT STATIONS CHECKED (4 L.S. ) 110 80 REQUIRED MONTHLY SEWAGE TESTS 10 12 SEWER PLANT MAINTENANCE (BANK & DOVE) 44 40 SEWER MANHOLES INSPECTED 43 28 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS 1 0 WATER SUPERINTENDENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 3. NOVEMBER 30, 1992 CITY OF SOUTHLARE PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 1992 NUMBER OF THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR PERMITS ISSUED MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE FISCAL FISCAL NOV92 OCT92 NOV 1991 1-11 1992 1-11 1991 10/92-11/92 10/91-11/91 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 23 36 20 333 179 59 34 Alteration/Addn. 6 2 1 28 28 8 1 Accessory Bldg 2 1 4 22 26 3 6 Commercial-New 3 2 0 16 3 5 0 Commercial-Alt/Addn. 0 2 3 12 24 -2- 7 Foundation Only 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Swimming Pool 4 8 4 99 83 12 10 SUB-CONTRACTORS: Electrical 78 85 35 714 396 163 68 Plumbing 33 63 28 518 382 96 75 Heat/Air 34 37 26 387 259 71 44 Culvert 1 1 0 13 10 2 1 Demolition 0 1 0 2 4 " 1 0 CERT. OF OCCUPANCY: Residential 32 85 24 359 223 117 64 COMMERCIAL 2 2 5 49 41 4 7 OTHER: Misc.Building 15 25 9 200 185 40 21 SIGNS 5 2 5 71 80 7 16 SCHOOLS 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 TENNIS COURTS 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 FENCE 0 0 2 6 12 0 3 TOTALS 238 352 166 2834 1941 590 357 4E1 • III 1 CITY OUTII<,ARE PERMIT HLY REPORT ' REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 1992 NOVEMBER 30, 1992 FEES COLLECTED FOR THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR PERMITS ISSUED MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE FISCAL FISCAL NOV92 OCT92 NOV 1991 1-11 1992 1-11 1991 10/92-11/92 10/91/11/91 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 26,594.00 43,619.00 24,577.21 415,359.00 212,892.86 70,213.00 40,128.53 Alteration/Addn. 1,915.00 482.00 173.00 7,205.00 7,251.80 2,397.00 173.00 Accessory Bldg. 1,745.00 199.00 575.00 5,589.00 2,993.08 1,944.00 768.00 Commercial-New 1,452.00 1,409.00 .00 25,520.00 8,369.00 2,861.00 .00 Commercial-Alt/Addn. .00 1,397.00 630.00 3,869.00 11,194.00 1,397.00 2,762.00 Foundation Only .00 .00 .00 .00 906.68 .00 .00 Swimming Pool 1,449.00 1,957.00 833.00 24,024.00 18,758.12 3,406.00 2,113.40 SUB-CONTRACTORS: Electrical 5,563.45 7,930.15 3,899.99 71,698.73 39,139.84 13,493.60 6,723.94 Plumbing 4,020.75 6,749.50 3,138.75 60,443.51 33,532.25 10,770.25 6,041.25 Heat/Air 2,300.50 3,326.50 2,354.75 31,741.50 17,513.44 5,627.00 3,570.75 Culvert 65.00 65.00 .00 860.00 2,174.00 130.00 65.00 Demolition .00 15.00 .00 30.00 30.00 15.00 .00 CERT. OF OCCUPANCY: Residential .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Commercial 60.00 60.00 150.00 1,260.00 1,150.00 120.00 210.00 • OTHER: Misc.Building 384.00 600.00 264.00 4,974.00 4,915.80 984.00 564.00 SIGNS 228.00 75.00 230.00 3,910.00 3,611.50 303.00 825.00 SCHOOLS .00 .00 .00 .00 4,595.00 .00 .00 TENNIS COURT .00 .00 .00 1,217.00 .00 .00 .00 FENCE .00 .00 1,162.20 3,904.00 3,087.69 .00 1,281.20 TOTALS 45,776.70 67,884.15 37,987.90 661,604.74 372,115.06 113,660.85 65,226.07 4E2 - 1 1 J V. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 1992 NOVEMBER 30, 1992 THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR BUILDING VALUATION MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE TOTAL FISCAL TOTAL FISCA FOR PERMITS ISSUED NOV92 OCT92 NOV 91 1-11 1992 1-11 1991 10/92-11/92 10/91-11/91 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 4,419,983.00 7,395,800.00 4,197,335.00 70,070,031.00 35,981,348.00 11,815,783.00 6,874,102.00 Alteration/Addn. 176,200.00 40,000.00 13,000.00 704,050.00 702,157.00 ---- 216,200.00 13,000.00 Accessory Bldg. 322,000.00 15,400.00 45,200.00 641,300.00 224,225.00 337,400.00 57,700.00 Commercial-New 108,800.00 142,000.00 .00 3,523,900.00 1,258,350.00 250,800.00 .00 Commercial-Alt/Addn. .00 15,000.00 34,800.00 341,300.00 955,876.00 15,000.00 234,800.00 Foundation Only .00 .00 .00 .00 . 67,700.00 .00 .00 Swimming Pool 118,000.00 160,000.00 65,000.00 1,870,200.00 1,477,800.00 278,000.00 164,000.00 SCHOOLS .00 .00 .00 745,000.00 12,389,500.00 .00 .00 TENNIS COURTS .00 .00 .00 137,500.00 .00. .00 .00 FENCE .00 .00 131,000.00 489,800.00 265,767.00 .00 139,000.00 TOTALS 5,144,983.00 7,768,200.00 4,486,335.00 78,523,081.00 53,322,723.00 12,913,183.00 7,482,602.00 TOTAL INSPECTIONS: 1487 1506 562 10,577 5597 2993 1209 BUILDING INSPECTIONS: CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION OCTOBER 156 $11,700.00 Building 362 490 174 NOVEMBER 59 4,425.00 Electrical 298 396 143 Plumbing 579 383 138 TOTAL TO DATE 215 $16,125.00 Mechanical 192 207 86 TOTAL BLDG. INSP. 1431 1476 541 CODE ENFORCEMENT: Investigations 56 30 21 4 E 3 SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MONTHLY REPORT ) //4 SOUTHLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT PATROL DIVISION SUMMARY November 1992 CALLS FOR SERVICE 544 CITATIONS 250 PATROL 157 S.T.E. P . 93 * STEP officers attending two week DWI school ARRESTS 17 I FELONY 1 MISD 16 ACCIDENTS 12 MINOR 10 MAJOR 2 p INVESTIGATION DIVISION MONTHLY REPORT November, 1992 NEW CASES ASSIGNED 34 CURRENT ACTIVE CASES 141 CASES CLEARED:: UNFOUNDED 3 INACTIVATED/SUSPENDED 19 EXCEPTIONALLY CLEARED 5 BY ARREST/CITATION 5 WARRANT ACTIVITY: SEARCH WARRANTS OBTAINED 0 SEARCH WARRANTS SERVED 0 ARREST WARRANTS OBTAINED 4 ARREST WARRANTS SERVED 4 GENERAL ACTIVITY: MEETINGS ATTENDED 7 SURVEILLANCE TIME (approx) 0 PUBLIC SPEECHES/PRESENTATIONS 0 CRIME SCENES WORKED 3 SEIZURES FILED 0 VALUE $ 0 SCHOOL/TRAINING SESSIONS 5 days S QUTHLAKE DEP AR TMEN T coF P UBL I C S AFE T Y MONTHLY WARRANT DI VISION REPORT ) NOVEMBER 1992 MUNICIPAL WARRANTS CURRENT MONTH PAST MONTH YTD WARRANTS ON HAND Beginning Count 451 351 N/A Received 51 195 816 Served 37 63 488 Purged 0 32 172 Ending Count 465 451 N/A FINES COLLECTED By Warrant Officer $3,913 $9,865 $56,066 By Other Agency $4,575 $1,928 $30,295 Total $8,488 $11,793 $86, 361 WARRANTS SERVED By Warrant Officer 19 53 327 By Other Agency 18 10 161 Total 37 63 488 . i SPECIAL SERVICES DIVISION MONTHLY REPORT November 1992 DARE Number of Days spent in schools. 9 Number Of 5th grade classes. __28� Number of K-4 visitations. 05 Number of 6th grade classes. _O___ Number of Middle school classes. 1 Total students taught . 33: Admin. Time. (hours) 30 Crime Prevention Number of security surveys Number of crime prevention presentations ..__._ci__ Misc . Activities Outside meetings 8 Tours J • Training (Hrs.) Training Days (As Instructor ) Vacation (Hrs.) 0 • .S'O!J Ty-//_ A K E L- A/ 7-/`11E N T C.-} LJL3 L I c 5 A f=-. "F. Y /`ICJN T HL Y" R'E_E./- J ` 7.. /VL. VE/`if31i /-N' AL7/Vr/VIS T A T-r VLE CY_L)r4 /_.)_Z" Al / C.) F'OL 1 C.Y S IN DEVELOPMENT f'UL ICI ES APPROVED . UNIFORM (POL ICE, FIRE, COMM) f Ili'f OPERA /1 UN S . HIRING PURSUI 1 PROMOTIONAL S1GNAlORE (3 . 0. ) r. RULES OF CONDUCT DISCIPLINARY INfEC TIDN CONTROL •. TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT . COMMUNICATIONS OPERA T1 ONS . • f?CJ7_"—S1 C7E 7R'A 1/VI/VG NAME COURSE DATE( BUDDY SANDERS I NTOXIL YZER OPERATOR CERTIF. 1 1 /0.9/92 - ! 1 13/.92' JEFF PAUL .1 NTOXIL YZER OPERA WE CERT 1 t- . 1 I %09..7:i2 I ( , !5/92 ROGER S T E WAR T ADVANCED FIRE .SC'E'V- EXA1'i1 NA 1 ION 1 l : I.Z/` -- 1 I/ /- JERRY KOVAR SEARCH AND RESCUE YAN L.0E.111ER SEARCH AND RESCUE RICK Y BLACK EMS CONFERENCE / " V'?'&ER T FINN EMS CONFERENCE 1, _'1 i'_ • i ' . ZN—Ht)L/.5'E= T/*`A ._I /V_L'NC DATE COURSE i NS ;NU:. 'Utz' NC)VEMBER NETWORK COMPUTER 1RAININr; NALC' %LI'1 JAL.'K.'SUN 1'1/4 - 1 I /6 FIRE INSPECTION PAR T- 1 ROGER l.E WI N 1 11/11--11/1 5 DEPAR("MENI IN-SERVICE EOUIPEMNT FIRE I:Ulf:NAN/ 1Ii"18-11/20i VEHICLE EXlE'AC'ATION VAVlD WINDROW TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTACT HOURS FOR IN-HOUSE TEA T NO: 1 61 L1 v OTHER ACTIVITIES: 1 . WORKED ON AWARDS BANOJUE l V1/EU. 2. ROBE RT FINN D1.IR ING RAN S11IUN _i- EM3 CUORDINA1U.R. 7. 5' SPENDING 1IME TALK I WI 1 H 1-'O1_.l / I CAL. SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE SERVICES DIVISION MONTHLY REPORT - November, 1992 FIRE CALLS: AVERAGE TIME ON CALL Structure-(residential) 4 0 Hrs_ 34_Min Structure-(commercial) 0 TOTAL $ LOSS (Fire) Structure-(other bldg) 0 $ 24,030 Vehicle-(car,boat,etc. ) 1 Grass/Trash 2 CALLS BY TIME OF DAY Total Fire Calls 7 0700-1200 13 24 % 1200-1900 18 33 % OTHER CALLS: 1900-2400 11 20 % Haz-Mat Incident 8 2400-0700 13 24 % Bomb Threat/Call 0 Other Emergency 18 PLAN REVIEWS: Other Non-Emergency 2 Comm. /Indust. 10 Total Other Calls 28 Residential 0 Subdivision 1 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE: C/O Issued 0 Total EMS Calls 20 OTHER ACTIVITY TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE (Dispatched / Tone Outs) 55 Burn Permits 83 Public Educ . PATIENTS TREATED: Classes 3 Total Patients Treated 23 Grass/Weed Complaints 0 Medical Only 9 Pre-fire Plans Injury Only 7 Reviewed 0 Both Med/Inj 0 MVA Patients 7 MVA with Seatbelt 4 Y" 7 OFFICIAL MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT • • MUNICIPAL COURT OF TRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS NON-TRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS Southlake November 92 NON- PARKING STATE CITY FOR MONTH , 19 PARKING LAW ORDINANCE 1. NEW CASES FILED DURING THE MONTH ii 221 0 14 5 TO TRIAL:2. DISPOSITIONS PRIOR A. Deposit Forfeited • 12 1 0 0 B. Fined I� (Before trial only.If the defendant goes before the 83 6 9 0 judge,enter in item 3.) C. Cases Dismissed (Do not include here those dismissals which are reported separately in 3C and 4 below.) 5 2 0 25 2 3 DISPOSITIONS AT TRIAL: r b fthe ud n er i of there is no a Pear a ore e e t n ( PP / 9 . - item 2. A. Trial by Judge (1) Finding of Guilty 8 0 0 • (2) Finding of Not Guilty n n 1 1 B. Trial by Jury (1) Finding of Guilty n a a a • (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 0 0 • C. Dismissed at Trial 8 0 1 0 CASES S =4. A ES DISMISSED: A. After Driver Safety Course 7 • • B. After Deferred Disposition (Art.45.54 C.C.P.) 5 C After Proof of Financial Responsibility ty (usually,liability insuranc e) 3 5. CASES APPEALED 0 0 0 0 JUVE NILE ACTIVITY: 11. SAFETY RESPONSIBILITY AND 6 DRIVERS LICENSE SUSPENSION 0 A. Warnings Administered HEARINGS HELD 0 12. SEARCH WARRANTS ISSUED (Do not include warrants for arrest) 0 B. Statements Certified accordance with Texas Family Code,Sec.5i.09(b).) 0—_ 13. ARREST WARRANTS ISSUED: Se C. Detention Hearings Held A. Class C Misdemeanors Only 46 (In accordance with Texas Family Code, 0 Sec.54.01.) B. Felonies and Class A and B Misdemeanors Only 0 7. COUNTY COURT COMPLAINTS 14. STATUTORY WARNINGS GIVEN ACCEPTED (Complaints within jurisdiction of 0 (Warnings given to defendants charged with County 0 County Court accepted in magistrate capacity) or District Court offense) 8. FELONY COMPLAINTS ACCEPTED 15. EMERGENCY MENTAL HEALTH (Complaints within jurisdiction of District Court 0 HEARINGS HELD O accepted in magistrate capacity) 9. EXAMINING TRIALS CONDUCTED 16. TOTAL REVENUE (Include only preliminary hearings of felony cases) e (Include all revenues collected during month to be remitted to the city • or state.) City 121,448778g5.25 10. INQUESTS CONDUCTED 0 State 14;063:�� COMPLAINTS REPORT NOVEMBER 1992 DEPARTMENT THIS LAST # CLOSED # CLOSED YTD* YTD* YTD* MONTH MONTH THIS MO. . LAST MO. RCVD. CLOSED OPEN NOV92 OCT92 NOV92 OCT92 1992 1992 1992 Streets & 21 33 24 21 423 287 136 Drainage Code 56 30 52 25 342 249 93 Enforcement Water & 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 Wastewater * YTD totals for 1992 Calendar Year 4/I "I CITY OF SOUTHLAKE General Fund and Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended November 30, 1992 with Comparative Actual amounts for the period ended November 30, 1991 To Date Percent To Date Actual Percent 1992-93 Actual Collected/ Actual Total Collected/ REVENUES Budget 11/30/92 Expended 11/30/91 9/30/92 Expended Ad Valorem Taxes $2,909,533 $237,729 8.2% $168,347 $2,722,621 6.2% Sales Tax 579,000 50,956 8.8% 46,731 510,036 9.2% Franchise Fees 304,450 90,451 29.7% 86,176 279,619 30.8% Fines 270,600 35,002 12.9% 34,535 203,565 17.0% Charges for Services 55,750 801 1.4% 1,857 46,357 4.0% Permits/Fees 622,150 196,813 31.6% 128,738 791,983 16.3% Miscellaneous 17,340 3,407 19.6% 2,051 32,213 6.4% Transfer In-Other Funds 267,295 0 0.0% 0 29,451 0.0% Interest Income 65,000 4,706 7.2% 4,754 67,118 7.1% Total Revenues $5,091,118 $619,865 12.2% $473,189 $4,682,963 10.1% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $145,599 $18,550 12.7% $17,458 $124,457 14.0% City Manager 141,239 20,320 14.4% 23,552 129,129 18.2% Support Services 509,964 61,180 12.0% 76,458 410,773 18.6% Finance 205,487 29,990 14.6% 25,755 192,339 13.4% Municipal Court 162,858 16,108 9.9% 18,332 145,345 12.6% Fire 569,238 62,200 10.9% 75,622 478,354 15.8% Police 909,333 100,370 11.0% 124,029 823,352 15.1% Public Safety Support 378,852 44,694 11.8% 43,595 340,626 12.8% Building 161,870 19,740 12.2% 16,707 127,329 13.1% Community Development 197,888 28,372 14.3% 22,923 145,364 15.8% Streets/Drainage 883,730 52,978 6.0% 48,995 642,300 7.6% Parks 139,595 2,554 1.8% 8,134 90,035 9.0% Public Works Administration 93,739 9,122 9.7% 10,848 69,673 15.6% Debt Service-General Obligation Bonds 916,398 21,198 2.3% 0 706,932 0.0% Total Expenditures $5,415,790 $487,376 9.0% $512,408 $4,426,008 11.6% Excess (deficiency)of Revenue over Expenditures ($324,672) $132,489 ($39,219) $256,955 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND (USESI Transfer to other fund $0 • $0 $0 ($796) Excess (deficiency)of Revenues and other sources over Expenditures ($324,672) $132,489 ($39,219) $256,159 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $1,244,380 $1,244,380 $988,221 $988,221 ENDING FUND BALANCE $919,708 $1,376,869 $949,002 $1,244,380 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended November 30, 1992 and November 30, 1991 To Date Percent To Date Total Percent 1992-93 Actual Collected/ Actual Actual Collected/ REVENUES Budget 11/30/92 expended 11/30/91 9/30/92 expended Water Sales-residential $1,07,540 $279,757 16.7% $249,442 $1,490,403 16.7% Water Sales-commercial 419,385 66,043 15.7% 66,036 328,942 20.1% Sewer Sales 205,454 31,692 15.4% 29,225 97,953 29.8% Sanitation Sales 258,000 46,584 18.1% 43,967 19,816 221.9%. Other utility charges 145,067 36,753 25.3% 26,171 147,218 17.8% Miscellaneous 22,118 112 • 0.5% 6,444 51,556 12.5% Interest Income 25,970 3,383 13.0% 5,519 24,565 22.5% Total Revenues $2,753,534 $464,324 16.9% $426,804 $2,160,453 19.8% EXPENSES Water $1,605,572 $149,658 9.3% $75,271 $1,063,222 7.1% Sewer 559,601 64,711 11.6% 34,147 693,241 4.9% Sanitation 232,200 20,417 8.8% 15,596 206,396 7.6% Debt Service- Revenue Bonds 79,719 0 0.0% 0 89,423 0.0% Other-Line Oversizing 25,000 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% Transfers-other funds 267,295 0 0.0% 0 159,446 0.0% Total Expenses $2,769,387 $234,786 8.5% $125,014 $2,211,728 5.7% Net Income/(Loss) ($15,853) $229,538 $301,790 ($51,275) FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 1 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.6r, OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT ******YEAR-TO-DATE****** ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 000 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 TAXES 110.00 AD VALOREM/CURRENT 87,241.69 136,292.78 7 1,877,484 1,741,191.22 111.00 AD VALOREM/DELINQUENT 21,403.06 24,272.91 17 140,000 - 115,727.09 112.00 PENALTY & INTEREST 850.29 2,378.34 3 85,000 82,621.66 115.00 SALES TAX 50,956.09 50,956.09 9 579,000 528,043.91 121.00 FRANCHISE-GAS 50,600 50,600.00 122.00 FRANCHISE-TELEPHONE 9,191.00 9,191.00 26 34,800 25,609.00 123.00 FRANCHISE-ELECTRIC 81,259.58 39 208,900 127,640.42 124.00 FRANCHISE-BANK 125.00 FRANCHISE-CABLE 10,150 10,150.00 100 TAXES 169,642.13 304,350.70 10 2,985,934 2,681,583.30 200 FINES 210.00 FINES & FORFEITURES 11,462.50 34,896.25 13 268,800 233,903.75 215.00 TEEN COURT REVENUES 20.00 106.00 6 1,800 1,694.00 200 FINES 11,482.50 35,002.25 13 270,600 235,597.75 300 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 301.00 AMBULANCE 470.00 800.50 5 15,000 14,199.50 302.00 DISPATCHING 303.00 MUTUAL AID 750 750.00 305.00 SPECIAL SERVICES PROGRAM 35,000 35,000.00 350.00 FIRE DEPT INCOME 5,000 5,000.00 300 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 470.00 800.50 1 55,750 54,949.50 400 PERMITS & FEES 410.00 PERMITS-RES NEW SINGLE FAM 26,594.00 70,213.00 22 325,000 254,787.00 410.01 PERMITS-BLDG RES-ALT/ADDN 3,605.80 4,087.80 4,087.80- 410.02 PERMITS-BLDG RES-ACS BLDGS 54.00 253.00 253.00- 410.03 PERMITS-BLDG COMMRCL NEW 1,452.00 2,861.00 2,861.00- 410.04 PERMITS-BLDG COMMERCIAL 1,397.00 1,397.00- 411.00 PERMITS-PLUMBING 4,182.75 10,726.43 21 50,000 39,273.57 412.00 PERMITS-ELECTRICAL 5,209.65 12,458.77 23 55,000 42,541.23 413.00 PERMITS-HEAT & AIR 2,397.00 5,796.50 23 25,000 19,203.50 414.00 PERMITS-SPRINKLER 384.00 960.00 24 4,000 3,040.00 414.01 PERMITS-WATER WELL 415.00 PERMITS-SITE PLAN 1,000 1,000.00 416.00 PERMITS-CULVERT 65.00 130.00 19 700 570.00 416.01 PERMITS-APPROACH 417.00 PERMITS-POOL 1,449.00 3,384.00 17 20,000 16,616.00 418.00 PERMITS-SIGN 228.00 303.00 8 4,000 3,697.00 419.00 PERMITS-HOUSE MOVING 419.01 PERMITS-DEMOLITION 420.00 PERMITS-SOLICITORS 100 100.00 421.00 PERMITS-ALCOHOLIC USE 422.00 PERMITS & FEES-MISC. 240.00 445.00 2 19,150 18,705.00 423.00 FEES-ZONING 305.00 844.10 9 9,000 8,155.90 424.00 FEES-PLATTING 38,750.00 63,530.00 254 25,000 38,530.00- 425.00 FEES-BOARD OF ADJ 50.00 3 1,600 1,550.00 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 2 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT ******YEAR-TO-DATE****** ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 426.00 FEES-ZONING SPECIAL EXCEPT 100 100.00 427.00 FEES-STREET LIGHTS 2,000 2,000.00 429.00 FEES-INSPECTION 390.00 3,148.55 6 50,000 46,851.45 430.00 FEES-SPECIAL USE ZONING 100.00 20 500 400.00 431.00 FEES-BUILDING 440.00 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION 4,425.00 16,125.00 54 30,000 13,875.00 400 PERMITS & FEES 89,731.20 196,813.15 32 622,150 425,336.85 500 MISCELLANEOUS 502.00 PERIMETER RD FEE 510.00 MIS-INCOME 119.50 950.45 16 6,000 5,049.55 511.00 MIS-VITAL STATISTICS 120 120.00 512.00 MIS-INSPECTION FEES 513.00 MIS-RETURNED CHECK CHG 45.00 38 120 75.00 515.00 MIS-FEMA FUNDS 516.00 MIS-STREET LIGHTS 517.00 MIS-ZONING 518.00 MIS-BUILDING 96.00 96.00 96.00- 519.00 MIS-POLICE DEPARTMENT 76.00 236.00 16 1,500 1,264.00 520.00 MIS-SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 530.00 MIS-TOWER LEASE 800.00 1,600.00 17 9,600,. 8,000.00 531.00 MISC-PUBLICATIONS 60.00 480.00 480.00- 500 MISCELLANEOUS 1,151.50 3,407.45 20 17,340 13,932.55 700 OTHER REVENUES 713.00 OPERATING TRANSFER IN 159,446 159,446.00 726.00 LOAN PROCEEDS 700 OTHER REVENUES 159,446 159,446.00 900 INTEREST 910.00 INTEREST EARNED 2,147.96 3,943.90 8 50,000 46,056.10 900 INTEREST 2,147.96 3,943.90 8 50,000 46,056.10 000 * NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 274,625.29 544,317.95 13 4,161,220 3,616,902.05 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 274,625.29 544,317.95 13 4,161,220 3,616,902.05 FUND 400 GO BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 9 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT ******YEAR-TO-DATE****** ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 000 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 TAXES 110.00 AD VALOREM/CURRENT 38,822.73 69,322.96 9 807,049 737,726.04 111.00 AD VALOREM/DELINQUENT 4,322.28 5,462.44 5,462.44- 100 TAXES 43,145.01 74,785.40 9 807,049 732,263.60 700 OTHER REVENUES 713.00 OPERATING TRANSFER IN 107,849 107,849.00 700 OTHER REVENUES 107,849 107,849.00 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 804.00 AD VALOREM - TRANSFER IN 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 900 INTEREST 910.00 INTEREST EARNED 453.45 762.25 5 15,000 14,237.75 900 INTEREST 453.45 762.25 5 15,000 14,237.75 000 * NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 43,598.46 75,547.65 8 929,898 854,350.35 TOTAL GO BOND DEBT SERVICE 43,598.46 75,547.65 8 929,898. 854,350.35 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 1 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 DEPT 000 TOTAL ******** .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 4,343.03 8,748.88 318.27 15 57,872 48,804.85 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 934.33 3,767.66 62.00 13 28,150 24,320.34 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 1,101.95 1,772.34 .00 12 14,500 12,727.66 500 OTHER EXPENSES 24.18 125.50 200.00 2 5,500 5,174.50 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 818.44 928.60 .00 11 8,500 7,571.40 700 MAINTENANCE .00 .00 .00 0 480 480.00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 1,262.14 3,206.95 .00 14 23,747 20,540.05 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00_ .00 0 6,850 6,850.00 DEPT 100 TOTAL ******** 8,484.07 18,549.93 580.27 13 145,599 126,468.80 CITY SEC/MAYOR/COUNCIL 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 8,808.42 18,020.83 636.88 14 126,267 107,609.29 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 1,000 1,000.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 258.53 422.78 .00 17 2,500 2,077.22 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 488.15 661.69 .00 32 2,100 1,438.31 700 MAINTENANCE 19.46 36.26 .00 6 600 563.74 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 778.97 1,178.32 .00 19 6,272 5,093.68 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 2,500 2,500.00 DEPT 103 TOTAL ******** 10,353.53 20,319.88 636.88 14 141,239 120,282.24 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 21,240 21,240.00 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,949.37 8,949.37 785.00 5 194,000 184,265.63 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS 4,226.39 6,360.84 .00 17 36,674 30,313.16 400 SUPPLIES 299.72 299.72 .00 9 3,500 3,200.28 500 OTHER EXPENSES 5,889.93 12,499.42 100.65 13 98,100 85,499.93 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 800.00 21,191.75 150.00 20 104,300 82,958.25 700 MAINTENANCE 5,364.14 10,941.47 .00 28 38,500 27,558.53 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION .00 .00 .00 0 150 150.00 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 937.09 937.09 .00 7 13,500 12,562.91 DEPT 105 TOTAL ******** 26,466.64 61,179.66 1,035.65 12 509,964 447,748.69 SUPPORT SERVICES 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 7,709.87 15,900.72 633.76 15 106,252 89,717.52 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 691.53 7,174.99 .00 11 66,500 59,325.01 400 SUPPLIES 1,580.61 1,863.71 .00 22 8,300 6,436.29 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 102.73 209.31 .00 5 4,200 3,990.69 700 MAINTENANCE .00 .00 .00 0 300 300.00 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 2 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 516.43 841.43 .00 14 6,215 5,373.57 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,000.00 4,000.00 .00 29 13,720 9,720.00 DEPT 106 TOTAL ******** 14,601.17 29,990.16 633.76 15 205,487 174,863.08 FINANCE 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 6,269.93 12,526.17 635.83 15 85,430 72,268.00 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,050.00 3,050.00 2,050.00 5 61,750 56,650.00 400 SUPPLIES 104.94 140.10 .00 4 3,500 3,359.90 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 35.12 122.42 .00 2 6,000 5,877.58 700 MAINTENANCE .00 .00 .00 0 3,100 3,100.00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 169.00 269.00 .00 11 2,378 2,109.00 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 700 700.00 DEPT 107 TOTAL ******** 9,628.99 16,107.69 2,685.83 10 162,858 144,064.48 COURT 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 28,628.18 57,763.02 2,337.76 12 471,041 410,940.22 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 3,500 3,500.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 700 700.00 400 SUPPLIES 501.03 501.03 661.65 4 12,450 11,287.32 500 OTHER EXPENSES 68.90 68.90 32.99 5 1,500 1,398.11 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 108.95 108.95 .00 14 800 691.05 700 MAINTENANCE 1,360.62 1,725.81 1,078.47 6 28,200 25,395.72 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 307.85 1,867.92 516.81 7 27,122 24,737.27 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 163.90 163.90 .00 1 23,925 23,761.10 DEPT 131 TOTAL ******** 31,139.43 62,199.53 4,627.68 11 569,238 502,410.79 FIRE SERVICES 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 45,456.89 89,074.20 3,406.08 12 723,394 630,913.72 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35.00 35.00 125.00 1 3,500 3,340.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 1,261.68 1,352.18 545.98 10 13,800 11,901.84 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 400 400.00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 0 2,000 2,000.00 700 MAINTENANCE 3,304.51 4,818.72 1,416.59 8 62,700 56,464.69 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 4,346.44 5,002.72 491.51 18 28,139 22,644.77 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 87.00 87.00 489.64 0 75,400 74,823.36 DEPT 132 TOTAL ******** 54,491.52 100,369.82 6,474.80 11 909,333 802,488.38 POLICE SERVICES 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 21,581.27 42,407.15 1,902.62 14 308,667 264,357.23 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42.00 42.00 .00 2 2,000 1,958.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 354.24 .00 8 4,250 3,895.76 400 SUPPLIES 1,063.70 1,063.70 20.42 12 9,000 7,915.88 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 1,000 1,000.00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 56.01 95.70 .00 5 2,100 2,004.30 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 3 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 700 MAINTENANCE 466.58 466.58 101.02 1 33,500 32,932.40 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 360.22 264.60 196.95 4 6,335 5,873.45 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 12,000 12,000.00 DEPT 133 TOTAL ******** 23,569.78 44,693.97 2,221.01 12 378,852 331,937.02 PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPORT 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 9,155.01 18,931.62 848.02 15 128,290 108,510.36 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 3,600 3,600.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 -- 400 SUPPLIES 204.18 204.18 .00 5 3,750 3,545.82 500 OTHER EXPENSES 15.14 21.24 .00 21 100 78.76 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 16.80 70.72 .00 5 1,350 1,279.28 700 MAINTENANCE 185.59 307.38 .00 6 5,050 4,742.62 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 335.10 205.10 .00 3 6,030 5,824.90 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 - 0 13,700 13,700.00 DEPT 142 TOTAL ******** 9,911.82 19,740.24 848.02 12 161,870 141,281.74 BUILDING 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 • 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 DEPT 143 TOTAL ******** .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 PLANNING & ZONING 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 14,873.10 30,847.81 1,795.17 11 273,205 240,562.02 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,002.50 9,689.50 4,037.50 17 55,900 42,173.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 7,000 7,000.00 400 SUPPLIES 42.91 42.91 .00 10 425 382.09 500 OTHER EXPENSES 2,191.63 4,128.83 .00 14 28,500 24,371.17 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .29 .00 0 0 .29- 700 MAINTENANCE 7,493.07 7,992.25 .00 5 177,500 169,507.75 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 148.00 148.00 .00 5 3,200 3,052.00 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 128.16 128.16 .00 0 338,000 337,871.84 DEPT 144 TOTAL ******** 33,879.37 52,977.75 5,832.67 6 883,730 824,919.58 STREETS 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,852.30 3,812.23 210.78 7 53,150 49,126.99 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 635.00 635.00 .00 19 3,400 2,765.00 400 SUPPLIES 88.35 175.20 .00 4 4,650 4,474.80 500 OTHER EXPENSES 4,360.08- 3,643.47- .00 22- 16,200 19,843.47 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 1.16 4.06 .00 4 100 95.94 700 MAINTENANCE 1,201.88 1,566.77 .00 9 16,600 15,033.23 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 4 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION .00 .00 .00 0 1,495 1,495.00 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 3.74 3.74 .00 0 44,000 43,996.26 DEPT 145 TOTAL ******** 577.65- 2,553.53 210.78 2 139,595 136,830.69 PARKS AND RECREATION 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 4,114.28 8,355.60 316.88 10 84,564 75,891.52 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 950 950.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 215.22 299.23 .00 37 800 500.77 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 300 300.00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 34.24 40.48 .00 5 800 759.52 700 MAINTENANCE 22.15 47.15 .00 0 0 47.15- 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 200.00 379.23 .00 6 6,325 5,945.77 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 DEPT 146 TOTAL ******** 4,585.89 9,121.69 316.88 10 93,739 84,300.43 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 10,946.68 20,767.76 847.33 16 133,543 111,927.91 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,070.00 5,070.00 3,270.97 12 4.1,400 33,059.03 400 SUPPLIES 298.81 420.20 .00 16 2,700 2,279.80 500 OTHER EXPENSES 500.00 512.72 .00 18 2,900 2,387.28 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 522.26 905.48 .00 16 5,800 4,894.52 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 673.88 695.88 .00 14 5,045 4,349.12 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 6,500 6,500.00 DEPT 150 TOTAL ******** 18,011.63 28,372.04 4,118.30 14 197,888 165,397.66 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND 100 TOTAL ******** 244,546.19 466,175.89 30,222.53 10 4,499,392 4,002,993.58 FUND 400 GO BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 12 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 500 OTHER EXPENSES 10,599.16 21,198.32 .00 8 250,963 229,764.68 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .00 300.00 0 665,435 665,135.00 DEPT 000 TOTAL ******** 10,599.16 21,198.32 300.00 2 916,398 894,899.68 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED FUND 400 TOTAL ******** 10,599.16 21,198.32 300.00 2 916,398 894,899.68 . FUND 200 WATER FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 3 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT ******YEAR-TO-DATE****** ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 000 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 500 MISCELLANEOUS 510.00 MIS-INCOME 46.00 82.25 1 .5,618 5,535.75 512.00 MIS-INSPECTION FEES 15,900 15,900.00 513.00 MIS-RETURNED CHECK CHG 30.00 30.00 5 600 570.00 500 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 112.25 1 22,118 22,005.75 600 UTILITY CHARGES 611.00 WATER SALES-RESIDENTIAL 113,158.88 279,756.66 17 1,677,540 1,397,783.34 --. 612.00 WATER SALES-COMMERICAL 17,308.86 66,043.18 16 419,385 353,341.82 613.00 WATER TAP 9,000.00 23,400.00 33 72,000 48,600.00 614.00 BULK WATER 1,295.46 3,007.94 17 17,500 14,492.06 651.00 SEWER SALES 15,389.64 31,691.80 15 205,454 173,762.20 652.00 SEWER TAP 825.00 2,550.00 17 15,000 12,450.00 670.00 GARBAGE SALES 23,464.16 46,583.68 18 258,000 211,416.32 670.50 RECYCLING RECOVERY 682.00 METER BOX 35.00 35.00- 691.00 METER TEST 692.00 UNAPPLIED CASH 229.30 229.30 229.30- 693.00 SERVICE CHARGE 930.00 2,295.00 22 10,305 8,010.00 694.00 LATE CHARGES 1,947.47 5,046.32 18 28,262. 23,215.68 695.00 DELINOENT ACCT COLLECTIONS 696.00 RECONNECT FEE 145.00 190.00 10 2,000 1,810.00 600 UTILITY CHARGES 183,693.77 460,828.88 17 2,705,446 2,244,617.12 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 807.00 TRANSFER IN-WW/IMPROVE 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 900 INTEREST 910.00 INTEREST EARNED 1,861.40 3,383.22 13 25,970 22,586.78 900 INTEREST 1,861.40 3,383.22 13 25,970 22,586.78 000 * NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 185,631.17 464,324.35 17 2,753,534 2,289,209.65 TOTAL WATER FUND 185,631.17 464,324.35 17 2,753,534 2,289,209.65 FUND 200 WATER FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 12/09/92 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 11/30/92 PAGE 5 FISCAL MONTH 02 16.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 372,014 372,014.00 DEPT 000 TOTAL ******** .00 .00 .00 0 372,014 372,014.00 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 24,421.46 47,526.41 1,794.47 16 304,727 255,406.12 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,915.00 2,915.00 1,330.00 8 35,000 30,755.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 6,000 6,000.00 400 SUPPLIES 557.23 590.58 .00 7 8,700 8,109.42 500 OTHER EXPENSES 71,407.01 77,341.34 2,639.02 8 1,024,320 944,339.64 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 4,329.66 5,007.99 .00 34 14,600 9,592.01 700 MAINTENANCE 10,981.47 11,575.15 .00 19 60,300 48,724.85 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 383.66 583.66 .00 9 6,300 5,716.34 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,117.50 4,117.50 .00 3 145,625 141,507.50 DEPT 147 TOTAL ******** 119,112.99 149,657.63 5,763.49 9 1,605,572 1,450,150.88 WATER 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 2,402.89 4,782.44 630.28 9 54,689 49,276.28 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 150.00 .00 2 10,000 9,850.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 5,000 5,000.00 • 400 SUPPLIES 208.48 208.48 .00 10 2,100 1,891.52 500 OTHER EXPENSES 1,020.26 1,532.69 .00 13 11,500 9,967.31 700 MAINTENANCE 8,916.28 57,892.77 .00 12 471,412 413,519.23 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 144.94 144.94 .00 12 1,200 1,055.06 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 3,700 3,700.00 DEPT 148 TOTAL ******** 12,842.85 64,711.32 630.28 12 559,601 494,259.40 SEWER 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,417.14 20,417.14 .00 9 232,200 211,782.86 DEPT 149 TOTAL ******** 20,417.14 20,417.14 .00 9 232,200 211,782.86 SANITATION FUND 200 TOTAL ******** 152,372.98 234,786.09 6,393.77 8, 2,769,387 2,528,207.14 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE INVESTMENT REPORT NOVEMBER 1992 MATURES PURCHASED NO OF DAYS RATE CALC INT BANK TYPE ID NO AMOUNT 12/01/92 11/01/92 30 .02400 32.73 Texas National Bank Savings 673 16,591 12/05/92 11/04/92 31 .02400 193.64 Texas National Bank Savings 1812 95,000 12/10/92 09/14/92 87 .02810 4,018.68 Treasury 912794zv9 600,000 12/11/92 07/12/92 152 .03250 , 1,740.76 Texas National Bank Savings 1755 128,619 12/15/92 11/15/92 30 .02500 205.48 Texas National Bank Savings 1655 100,000 12/15/92 11/15/92 30 .02500 206.91 Texas National Bank Savings 2192 100,696 12/17/92 09/16/92 92 .02849 2,154.39 Treasury 912794zb3 300,000 12/17/92 09/18/92 90 .02849 1,404.79 Treasury 912794zb3 200,000 12/18/92 11/18/92 30 .02350 96.58 Texas National Bank Savings 1574 50,000 12/19/92 11/19/92 30 .02350 96.58 Texas National Bank Savings 1556 50,000 12/31/92 11/29/92 32 .03500 10,819.16 TexPool 3,525,887 01/01/93 09/20/92 103 .02750 527.15 Texas National Bank Savings 1761 67,929 01/07/93 10/06/92 93 .02550 1,299.45 Treasury 912794zy3 200,000 02/17/93 08/19/92 182 .03700 1,844.93 Atlantic B & T CD 9941 100,000 02/17/93 08/19/92 182 .04050 2,019.45 Midland Bank CD 9940 100,000 02/17/93 08/21/92 180 .03700 1,824.66 Bank of San Diego CD' 9959 100,000 04/15/93 10/16/92 181 .02920 4,344.00 Treasury 912793c28 ' 300,000 09/23/93 10/01/92 357 .02820 5,516.38 Treasury 912794e34 200,000 09/23/93 10/19/92 339 .03050 2,832.74 Treasury 912794e34 100,000 Average: 118 .02910 Total: 6,334,722 Count: 18 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE UTILITY BILLING MONTHLY REPORT NOVEMBER 30, 1992 THIS LAST YEAR MONTH THIS MONTH ACCOUNTS BILLED: WATER $133,481.34 $132,091.61 SEWER 15,389.64 14,932.40 GARBAGE 23,107.21 17,039.30 SALES TAX 1,667.52 1,240.58 RECYCLE 0.00 4,126.79 OTHER 1,859.34 0.00 TOTAL $175,505.05 $169,430.68 NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS: WATER 2,762 2,388 SEWER 650 406 GARBAGE 2,781 2,417 TOTAL ACCOUNTS BILLED 3,003 2,608 CONSUMPTION BILLED (IN 000'S): WATER 28,259 25,686 SEWER 7,585 0 NEW CUSTOMERS 40 37 AMOUNTS COLLECTED DURING MONTH $250,887.40 $221,415.00 FINAL BILLINGS 43 26 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM December 9, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, P.E. , Public Works Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Manufactured Building for Public Works Department In the 1992-93 Water Budget, $25, 000 was budgeted for the purchase of a manufactured building approximately 12' x 56' . The final dimension of the building is 14' x 58' . On Tuesday, December 8, 1992, bids were opened and read aloud for the manufactured building. Below are the bidders that bid on this project: Contractor Base Bid Alternate Bid Amtex $ 25,676 $ 4,967 Scotsman Buildings 29,762 3,594 Gelco Space 30,862 5,198 Ramtech 29,400 5,198 The base bid was for the manufactured building. The alternate bid was for a concrete ramp to the building required by Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) . The concrete ramp was not included in the original estimate, but is required. Since the building and ramp are temporary, the staff would recommend that alternative methods of constructing the ramp (such as, wood instead of concrete) be researched before awarding the alternate bid. Staff would propose to fund the additional $676 ($25, 676 - $25, 000) from the estimated oversizing amount of $20,000 since it is not known at this time what the oversizing costs will be. The building is proposed to house the Water and Sewer and the Street Superintendents, the Engineer-In-Training and the Public Works Inspector. An additional office can be provided when needed. Amtex was the company that built the existing Public Works manufactured building and we have had little to no problems with the building. Therefore, Staff would recommend that the base bid of $25, 676 be awarded to the low bidder Amtex Construction Company and the alternate bid not be awarded at this time. Please place this , item on the Council's December 15 agenda for their approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. MHB/1 c cl 4nenaslp i akd sa City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM December 8, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-55 Rezoning Request { REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning request for 1.00 acre situated in the J. A. Freeman Survey, Abstract . No. 529, being legally described as a portion of Lot 2B, Gorbutt Addition and a revised concept plan for the proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 of the Miron Addition LOCATION: 1600-Block of East Southlake Blvd. OWNER: Robert W. Miron APPLICANT: Paul Bruton, D.V.M. CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" and "S-P-2" with certain "B-2" uses REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for a large animal veterinarian clinic with "C-2" uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/Transitional BACKGROUND INFO: On December 17, 1991, the City Council approved the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 480-61 and the accompanying concept plan for a "B-1" zoning for the area to the East and South of this area in question. According to the minutes of December 17, 1991, Council's motion was "to approve Ordinance No. 480-61 with the suggestion to cul-de-sac the road, including the concept plan." (Staff did not have the exact motion of the "B-1" approval before them during the public hearing at P & Z. ) {In reviewing the tape of the December 17, 1991 meeting, it was not clear whether or not the suggested cul-de-sac was to be permanent or temporary. It appeared that the Council did want Miron Drive to stubout to the West.} On the same evening, the applicant withdrew a "B-2" application for the area North and West of the approved "B-1" area. In May, 1992, Council granted "S-P-2" zoning with certain "B-2" uses to the area of the previous "B-2" request shown as Block 1, Lot 2, Miron Addition on the original concept plan approved at that time. Mr. Miron indicated that the intended use was for mini-warehouses. In the enclosed submittal, Mr. Miron has reconfigured and renumbered the lots on the concept plan and plans to incorporate a portion of Lot 3 (formerly Lot 2) into Lot 2 and sell this acre site to Dr. Bruton for a veterinarian clinic. 7A- i Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager December 8, 1992 ZA 92-55 Page Two The "C-2" district permits only small animals and Dr.Bruton's practice includes large animals as well. He proposes placing all animal enclosures inside and intends no outside storage. NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) RESPONSES: No written responses; One (1) verbal inquiry: John Napper, representative for Smock and Husseini Joint Venture P & Z ACTION: November 19, 1992; Approved (5-0) subject to the Plan Review Summary dated November 12, 1992 with the following recommendations: 1) that the exhibit show a shared access easement between Lot 2R, Block 1 with the lot to the East and 2) that there be a temporary turnaround at the west end of Miron Drive. COUNCIL ACTION: December 1, 1992; Approved (6-0) subject to the Plan Review Letter dated November 25, 1992, deleting item #6 which required an access easement from Lot 2, Block 1 to . Lot 1, Block 1. STAFF COMMENTS: No revisions were received. Attached please find the reduction and second plan review summary dated November 25, 1992. KPG t1A -z _c_i_. :-•"°•• i I . /. BM ha ___. ... ' 1 JOHNSON - r+ .....,.... .- . ''' ' i. ,- 1- -,.' • ( ' ' „NI 51 i K ,...I. ,...4. I ..... C. ELEMENTA 106 •- ‘\\ 11°21/ • -1,i, i fS5 ......,....,...Ths......„.„... 544(.5.1;. •4 3. , .04. oil ir•ir '• .....‘ il ARROV. -- 1-..... l'il'" wa9 w'i ' 7.4,-,i121111 I 4 i 1-6°7 I II . STRUT I 11'.'" .__I I I i . _.1n;TA __ , c.. -.:7------5-----\.--7-----1?. .. / •C IftiiRoL1 01 WI,,, ,, .1 a cl•Araij. iit- . ,..-rtr 4 , . , ANOOLE ''• 903 As 1 I/MAI 1 1 •12 ha ' ... I I I 14 hi 11, itic-141.ii- TB • '. . -__Thki9/4/. 11. . 41,419 . re'..: 1.31.4p 17__ ::7 'cr ----it .:"' 1,-/ ,‘ I 1 4 t144 -- -.4: 1 L_J V= L-.----] 2111 gAi... I. 50 • 5....-3 . r., ,.... 4. 50 5 AritlE X 3 .--- ••IV C.115 ,CIA I _L r__.--I IS, e L IROCHARDS I is..... w.,Ti \Ai.: 1 i•.N 1...:. 7.,,..4,,Lii IEAD . SURVEY ASSY.ND Ael SUR Y 43_1/.1,,ir_4_ QM ,„ __ _.s. , 311,St. .3.•.13,IN .. ,,,, ? . .pe. i It •11-11-00MAS MAHAN •• i 1\ SURiar, AUST tit 10•9 ..u., ,,c SA - I I 1...Y1....!.. A..' "'Ur' /,. . • ' ... 144, 29 ...,2_,,,5,11....r .5.C., 0 , • • 1 ,,, i,..., - . '4.' NZ._IT]h,..L%5Stk n14_6 6r0 I 24 4 L ..4 -.,r - __. .1„,04Pcl- .. ... .. -...1 ... 6 /.1 s• 3 2911 124/ 5CI 01 0 045 CITY . z. - ,., ),.. .,..esce2pAhr....- . rc za.rm... I °I) . .. ,. •• .,.t... _.,- ^----' HALL j _17 L_.- • -0 E. 'SI? 5e.S .4.: ...1-1-1--L-1-Tili Iti I sl r,va..I-A.4-.•_•.•-::: - - ,..s.1 rp. ___. 1, 502 c:ISIO r, .1„, _______ i :•: • • -• • • Awer- I-- - - - ( _ ,seit 2112 1..., 2., 5C . ygv:05`' ---___ . ,_67.---1-;- --- --------1._ol- 'C - 1 1 ;044100:, -_*_• "i3EI. • • sai• •- 1. 5., sld NORTHWEST AlssoNA, 6 ..--J--........... • I-- • .}6, -sosTrir-cr- I 4- ) . •-• . .1.4-1---------...r A . --- •1 ' L. 1---30Ti ' ----->i • D 0.-,. • L..vi•E • • 'E.,.ST091 EMI__,11THI.AISE__BLYD____ ---] st- ......._ 592 \,,.3..36i, 3c ne, I CI 2 1--- 2B •hij -. - -I- pig tear soU114 A IAA 1'(215 .1 //:I•126. I:-2-i-• 2.1. 2. 4044 6.13.. rs2.7,_ 492. 11 6(2g 1-• i 15 At I ,____ , , •-T,-. 1, . 2A2A I I 01 C• 1• Soo •S as 30 1. SO' --1-1. . NH;-•-2,1 261A 2•I9 1 2A1 •- IAi 1 Jtrksii. ' )i , - . I 1 / i ,60 .....„.•-• • . z.,,,, • 2.3 I .2Ca As . 'L____\___ I, :ol • • i" 11. ._ i_ , f--f r------ .0 -1-X1- E. • / '' 1.°1°L1!1_1-_-_-____ I .. _ ci. e______ •4 - .... _i_4, A . 1.,. 4-4- -- ... -iP1-1.--1- I OH N A. IF I'. I: I kl..!.14 - ,4... •t __Q_..ccio____ s .h. R t T ABS T IRO 29! •l'S--,_ - - _ tikEPr ,.. DMIX! W. KNOG11-0 1.1 , ,,,.. ••• ---___ 1 KS - .. sflio-i" -- -- `' lel Veal'ADST.H2B99 I SC yal a. • •• tAll 1 2 I I \ .____ iLl . .. A 6,90. .Ly I._ ..I.I.1_1...2." --I f I , . •••., .\\\I . 1239. H.- 4 a. . •C .---- •• 1431 20. 190 Wit . ..'- I --. /•. .0•.. .a. i. •.'1l1i!) _D.SURE .A aSI,La l!._-IL•ft. ic _.... . - .1 1 IC Cr 1 . ..f .:1 C.B. Mcp0h7ALID V. 104a 0,14 I 04110 ! I . . SuRVEY 16S1 N9.013 I • • ‘111" 61k.icIt4 } I .--• Vit K-[i El ..1:4ectrt V. 1 0-04 • rtt I . i ' 1 . -:-.1 iI 1 1 54 CONTINENTAL BLVD I I I I I ,/, • 2 i'?1,, :I..4 7.14.-• I ir,-0-,I.1-- ", 'Iii:Y.!:::. -'i::::,'I 1:..".Ir.I 1-,`" - Ill - i r I ' l i• „•. „,,..••ID•is•l''''I"'I. . NOi ID am. 194 * 111.1h• Its,I 0 a At IA .5112• --- -10 .-14-41f41 : , 19.q I... IA • . • al, 11. 9 p.r• ilss• 13410. E,,, ,os•t„,,;(,:II' ; IHOIL IL II NGS W(D',A i IHI I S . 1 .1 il) '12 'intat'i :1 I 1" t .,NI si II ,t,4•••' 11 44.Ac La 1AL I I Di ,4.11VM13; N I EC!KIER 1 , '• ' I 4 A i I a• to 0..,(I 4 '1V4b213 11"CI: '4'.71'. "' • e AS ...4.44 . I 2.. '''" .01Rt,),1`. 14,A )1e1' I IBI A IZ HIE 7-..r . .41. SIJI.V1 V MAO Ay As/ i I It !' P IL A hq st I I u_n_uil I, I sujvir A.:,NV vs 5 3 . 103T ", --.00tRIM .doei;-66" ".- Ill :.,;•:,.„ SuRVI.•ABS I A•NN. ' _ '''____ 1 1 I I . srAo I \ \ ?A ,,,K•5 •• Ili'. 1 i IRS 1 t•:, elKt -'I " .. ._.. • AL I 1 TR 2A I ( 53.y 97 AC ,' I Shamrock Pipeline Corp ) I Carol Jean Williams I James P. Farrar "C-3" j I "C-3' I • 493 P State of Texas2 State of Texas 1B .185 @ _ 1 i50.149 @ _ • 1A 1/ 25C/"B_ 2A .047 @ .105@ 1.522 AC R.W. Miron QIV�� "C-2" iA t3 ' .E. Taylor / 25B / 2.07 218 Smock & Husseini JV ^ VilRAN —✓�7 I. 1 1A 25 12.622 AC 262a5 1.01`. "0-1" R.W. Miron 2 "S-P-2" • R.W. Miron "B-ltt i52 4 • L.s.„.........._... 22 5 1 /4 6 ----- --- SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD,," i. , .8 89°49'2Q"6 145.09 .o�r1___...... ,,, 15'Utiilty Eoeemsnl•••••, 41' - 15 BUILDING LINE — " I z 1 0 I n. n • d' 0 . j a LOT 2A • LOT 29 i'yj 1 CO 0 to4. J 0 0 4 n,O fn 7 w I.00ACRESFt M /. • r` 0 �` i 0 0 H O . p w 1 x w BLOCK I ,_ z _. N i g SCALE I".40' k `ti 5 y Her• „4 `41: • N89°49'20"W 145.00 o�1ry 4.1 _ tiJ SKETCH To ACCOMPANY FIELD NOTES FOR A PORTION OF LOT 2B, BLOCK 1, GORBUTT ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 3B8-•205, PAGE 10, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. • . This is to certify that I have surveyed the above described property and find no protrusions, or encro chments there n, ex opt hown. Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 2014 Date 8 "-ye ni Z • According to the FIRM Community Panel No. • 480612 0020 B this tract is not affected 4''A7` by the 100 year flood plain. zone C. • if ' .:. f \ . e • U OMP P.O.WApjz ? 253 FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76182.0253 • (0171 281-5411 51316 FIEU_NOTEL_ FOR A PORTION OF LOT 2B, BLOCK 1, GORBUTT AUDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH1..AKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 300-205, PAGE 10, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. BEGINNING at a If iron at the Northwest corner of maid Lot 2B in the South right-of-way line of Southlake Alva; THENCE 5.89°-49'-20" E. 145.00 feet along said right-•of- way line to a 1/2' trori at the Northeast corner of said Lot 2B; THENCE S. 0°-07'-31" W. 300.41feet along the East line of said Lot 2B, to a iy" iron in same for corner; THENCE N. 89°-99'-20" w. 145.00 feet to a V" iron in the West line of said Lot 2B for corner; THENCE N. 0°-07'-31" E. 300.41 feet along the West line of said Lot 2B to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 1.00 acres. • Surveyed on the ground August 18,1992_ • • 17 r f. WAL T!:•:, t '.may. 2014 • �' , �, a," • • • ___ ._ i . . _. ._. .. . - �. ... . 1 _ _ _ _ (•_)I J.A. F -EMAN SURVEY, A--529 1/2" I.P.F. - � r r AN r - �_ 1,2" I.P.F. _ _ I �� F F _114 EXIST. 20' U.E. • I - - —I I I I ______43:L2 P VM T. - ---- BUILDING LINE TING la : • : -- �-- ----�--� - STRUCTUR _ o w -� /I 1111•T 1 EXISTING I •Z o z I I tiJ--- T I 1. JZ � _-1-_- O V - -�� C2 ':'�' J ;� z �Zml— a, Z ��• �� / 2.E 6� --- -L • _ wa o •374., • ili , EXISTING n 1 N — 29" E OP C ��„p Wx I 1n --� �15 'nca ►wa c �I S,�NG G .4.s Q�QO/�' E,.) 40' —I BUILDING 1 / '��0 co co -. 25' X 230' - O, Ora 1;4- P N. x — jT2 : I 0J��, . c, c,`L`r o . I CONC.I DWY" - N I %' L1 dO 414 �p\, QQ�`�<. o 260' •6500 S. • PP �/ EXIS 1 Jp2" I.P.F. zx I CONC. D LOT 2 "� /� - STRUCTURE f1 .P.F. 170.00' air !w" NG 3 �', '� TO' U.E. In CON It '1. I N 1111WIMPF: . � i1 c2 Mi250....._a5a5 0 _ o -'��' '� F',� PROPOSED I- oT 1 cAlift1111°P.... � CONCRETE w PAVING wI r 1z IIIIIIIIIIIM J w 0 LO.a -I Q y IQ JI t—uer LOT 4 m , J FUTURE IEELOELT"� - IT � o' O w I m o f E I I--TEMP. TURNAROUND SO'.100 Ix 0 NI I �� ii11111: Z I 0 0G ' (-5o ct1 ' ~sism z• E.ti (i) 1,1 CO B1 ZONING 0 � N 89'55'08" W 548.34' in 1 DS- -...- I f MP. TURNAROUND 1-1- \ �S-As ON c' ---(01 ---- e I LOT 3 -- --� FUTURE DEVELOPM0' j-Ln I 1- _ --- ---�` 3P Lw -- - -- - - -- 'N - _E_ - - - - F - - - - - - - - APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN r S-P-2 / ORDINANCE NO. 480-67 'JA -1 I City of Southlake,Texas — CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-55 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 11/25/92 PROJECT NAME: CONCEPT PLAN for S-P-2 Zoning Request Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Miron Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Robert W. Miron J. E. Levitt Engineers P. 0. Box 1164 726 Commerce Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 Suite 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 488-2659; Phone: (817) 488-3313 Fax: Fax: (817) 488-3194 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE. REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/23/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS . IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . • 1. Provide total acreage for both lots in the title block. 2 . It appears that the R.O.W. for Miron Drive has been shifted approximately 30 ' to the north. 3 . Show extent of tree coverage. 4 . Change bufferyards along the west line of Lot 3, Block 1 & Lot 3, Block 2 to 'D' . 5 . Delete the ' S-P-2 ' zoning shown on Miron Drive in Block 1 . 6 . Provide an access easement from Lot 2, Block 1 to Lot 1, Block 1. 7 . Add block designation to second comment in No. 4 General Notes . * This concept plan is being used for two purposes, the zoning of Lot 2, Block 1 to S-P-2 with veterinary clinic and C-2 uses, and a revision to the Concept Plan for Lot 3, Block 1 approved with Ordinance No. 480-67 . * All signs and culverts must be permitted separately. Proposed improvements within State R.O.W. will require SDHPT approval prior to issuance of a building permit. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 12/7 , 1992 . All revised submittals should be folded 6" x 9" and include an 8 .5" x 11" reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Robert W. Miron J.E. Levitt Engineers 7A- I • I0' II l0 II¢ r,, I,, SO) N 4 ' QIa L...? EAST SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F.M. 1709) _Nip o • J.A. FREEMAN SURVEY, A-529 -T9 1/2" I.P.F. `ji 1145.00 ,,L�f 8 .I 1- ,�1/2' I.P.F. ;:' w'27.T _ i� EXIST. N 104, _ _ _ PVMT._, _ , L ��—) W 50' B.L. — EXISTING r7 50' B.L.bl— . C PROP STRUCTURE EXISTING•, E VET, SIRUCTUREgyi E — CLINIC N.-4 ) P.O.B. t —2762 Sico. 169.08' • t boo ,., A N 9'52'21" E e l C L I I 10 co P1 L 1 Amor, el. 1r� II I v' 200.31 C1 'j�-I, EXISTING II I S 89'52'29" E(( Ij i, STRUCTURES Co(' OO� W I M l.L—J IJ )( )� AUTOMATICI ��/� �4.5,. ,� M GATE_y 1 0Q0�/� 07 L ', BUILDING s1 52.29' pied 1Q y�,�� i-X r x 23�s s.F. o . . I o Gb LOT 1 0� y9Fe0 J4F'P�,`O G•`t cob L_{ T4S Q�—-I 30' BUILDING N2 30 I p�t`O JCS QQ�t� S.89'49'20' E x 3125 S.F. o I EXISTING ZX n in N STRUCTURE 172' I.P.F. N • N '7 �'?. t' I.P.F. 1 170.00' �0' 30' X 260' B7800 s.13 J�� ,S 89'55 08 WT N n 16.7a'� f [� 00� N N f10' U.E. l •<',QP X :`'##t3t. ::```;:: ` : '.`:i:�• < X I X `-1 PROPOSED • w CONCRETE w ��i �• CHAINLINK FENCE ZI I PAVING w �O,34� �• 56.U0' v) w \ -4, Q' o pp n F-. W I- z I) �I N Q! Ip • J F Co c`l FUTURE DEVELOPMENT G o N Z to m O D w CO CP X 10�\� M I o I o 0 L �,�F. 5P� �' I`nIn CD LOT 2 c.) 469.90 h \,-. \S 8934'58" E , 1 vo ix `[ 1' N N a°1 SP2 ZONING N 0 W\ � MIRON DRIVE �, B1 ZONING I I o l _�' / I co — / ..-'04C.',r. I LOT-3 `1A -9 ORDINANCE NO. 480-67-A A ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMEND 2 , THE OMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTA ' TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE EXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 1. 00 ACRE TRACT OUT OF THE .OHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTACT NO. 529 AND BEING LEG' LY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 2B OF THE GORBUTT ' ► IITION, FROM "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ' "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH CERTAIN B-2" USES, TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTR ' T FOR A LARGE ANIMAL VETE RINARIAN CLINIC ":.'-2"«< USES; _ A M IgsVCED : : L N; FFtPOOE? . 020>` g« & >3fAVOCK : Z: :7 : : %4ittiK44404. T1 .. AD .MO ' CULLY :AID COMPLETEL bESCRTBED IN EXHIBIT ..."A, " SUBJE• TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERV NG ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETE' ' ING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL W. FARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS H °EIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE C• ULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABIL ' Y CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FO' VIOLATIO•.S HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PU%: ICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVI D NG AN E. ECTIVE DATE. 'EREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a - •me rule City acti = •• - its Charter adopted by the ele • ate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 o - -xas Co ' - o ion and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as :p..::..-: mz o;.::.: . .::: :. ..:.::::cbmmere: a:>:.:::<:an.. .;:.;:.:;.5.::.;F;:.:;2:.;:::;:Generaa:?:zcW:<St :>tf.ga: Distract; under the City s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public -/ v and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance fpr off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of -land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approxiimately a 1. 00 acre tract out of the John A. Freeman Survy, Abstract No. 529 and being legally described as a portion of Lot 2B of the Gorbutt Addition and being.- more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A, " tt € e :et From "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with certain "B-2" uses, to "S- P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for a large animal veterinarian clinic with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses except for the following: • The above-described tract of land shall be further subject to the development regulations set forth in the "C-2" Local Retail' Commercial District and any other restrictions and requirements set forth on the approved concept plan 4:080§00010.090iiiiiii.tgaginginggi ::::::o.f::;thc atigon::;::Ad�d: ::a on attached hereto and incorporated herein as .- .y;ti:..........:: �::: :� : :': '�i:•iiiiii i}iii. y:: .:'.i.. ExhibiB. . ... A revised concep t plan meeting the requirements of to and approved by the City Council prior to issuance of any building permit. Section 2 . That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3 . That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. 7.Ce -iz r Section 4 . That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morales and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7 . Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2 , 000. 00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8 . All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affection zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provision, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper �� -/3 one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3 . 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1992 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1992 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: 4S0-67-A.SP2/ORD&RES/kb City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM December 7, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator - SUBJECT: ZA 92-39 Specific Use Permit REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for two (2) portable buildings for temporary educational and fellowship space until the new permanent structures are completed. This request is per Section 45.1 (30) and Section 45.7, Ordinance No. 480, as amended. The church indicates a need for these buildings for approximately eighteen (18) months. They request waivers to both the masonry and the permanent foundation requirements. LOCATION: 940 - S. Carroll Avenue, being legally described as approximately 2.00 acres situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tracts 6D and 6F. OWNER/APPLICANT: First Baptist Church of Southlake; Falis Holloway, Pastor CURRENT ZONING: "CS," Community Service (eastern half fronting S. Carroll Ave. ) and "AG," (western half) . This zoning was initiated by the City Council with approval of the zoning map and Ordinance No. 480 in September, 1989. • BACKGROUND INFO: The church will present a more detailed concept plan for approval at the time they rezone the western half of their property to "CS." NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven (7) RESPONSES: None P & Z ACTION: October 22, 1992, November 5, 1992, and November 19, 1992; Approved applicant's request to table and continue the public hearing until December 3, 1992. December 3, 1992; Approved (6-0) subject to the Plan Review Summary dated November 25, 1992. The Commission further recommended approving the portable buildings for eighteen (18) months and approving the waivers for the permanent foundation and masonry requirement. • •STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Third Plan Review Summary dated December 9, 1992. • AIV/ fRPG A- 67r4t‘Z450ti/Itt ChardV `p'rvc FALIS E.HOLLOWAY Pastor4v' �^ 1 I ti9oGCH JESTS`b TO: City Council City of Southlake FROM: First Baptist Church of Southlake SUBJECT: Request for Temporary Portable Building Permit. First Baptist Church of Southlake, request approval to place two portable buildings behind our existing worship facility. The property of First Baptist Church of Southlake is located on a two-acre tract at 940 South Carroll Avenue. A legal description and location of this property is as follows : Being a track of land situated in the 0. W. Knight Survey, A-899, Tarrant County, Texas, ,stated as follows: Beginning at an iron rod in a county road and being 786.42 feet North of the Southeast corner of said O. W. Knight Survey; Thence West at a distance of 20. 8 feet an iron rod, a total distance of 419.44 feet to an iron rod; Thence North a distance of 209.72 feet. to an iron rod; Thence East a distance of 419.44 feet to an iron rod; Thence South a distance of 209.72 feet to place of be- ginning, containing 2.0 acres of land, more or less, with approximately 0. 1 acre being occupied by a public road. On the north side of us is the residence of Billy and Cheryl Pond (920 South Carroll) , on the south side is the residence of Steve and Brenda Ryan (960 South Carroll) . The property to the front, which is across Carroll Avenue is pasture land, the land to the rear is pasture land owned by Mobil Corporation. The use of the portable buildings will be for temporary use until our new worship facility is built, which is scheduled for ground- breaking in the second quarter of 1993, pending final changes and approval by the City of Southlake Council. Outlined below is our current constra,:tion plan. 940 cS eatto«Ski_ Ea ,_ r7rA 76°92 (81/) 4S -S69S gt}-2. Phase I . Start construction of new Worship Center in the spring of 1993 . Phase II . Upon completion of the new Worship :enter, the existing facility will be modified to be utilized as education space. When this is done we will no longer need the portable buildings. Phase III . Construction of a two-story Christian Life Center and Education Building. As required by Article 45.7 (Specific Requirements For Portable Buildings) , we agree to the use and standards. Specifically: A. Portable buildings shall be used on a temporary basis. We do not anticipate them being in use for more than a year to eighteen months, depending on delays in con- struction, the weather, etc. B. The buildings to be utilized are buildings that are used all over the state of Texas by Baptists Churches who need temporary space while they are building new buildings, and thus, must meet the State of Texas Codes . 1 . One of the buildings is a Morgan Building ( 20 X 40 ) owned by the Baptist General Convention of Texas . 2. The second building ( 12 X 50 Mobile Building) is owned by Parker County Baptist Association. In reference to Item C of Article 45.7 , we request a waiver of the requirement to have a masonary facade. The building will be placed behind our existing building and will not be visible from the street or the general populace. We request permission to place these buildings on blocks with with a neat appearing skirt to cover up the blocks and space between the ground and the bottom of the building. The building will be kept neat in apprarance through- out their use by us. If any additional information is needed we will be most happy to provide it. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, alis E. Holloway Pastor g R -3 „p - / ,..„,.,„, -•,,, . -...............- -- .. -- 16 . LIS MLR 1 A • •---.-• , •,:zat , . I eif s I: p••• '1'04:'''._4•-,.....\._:--. --... 3...--7-i" izr_. . ,L S. .'...• eani. Zot ao t ••,....,x. ; ,„0- _ ...,_ ._. : eltil-r- " ,P- I-/F°1-1 1 ,.• FES(7.-\ 1 :i OA 'l I •••:.,ass ha. , A I .t5.:,-,-,:..s , ... ; Ls ‘, . ..al 71:-Tall!i I .0=a7lci sTa.„ i 71: 1 -°'I j- - _... _ .- '.•"',-4.3 I f I • • •• Z.. Z.i. 2 f.. z.,., ••••••---- • ; utroa. ! pia•gt041.....1..,: GPlittStne- fte--'- ,- ..,.. 41•••ma 1 r " • , IS / ,,fire Se . Z , 1 1.,I,". r• .. ell! Iff raDDLE oe a'•at . 1- 1- : ''.• i 3oL 11 j2••••• I, =1 ,•.,asc400L i1: . •-...; li• "•• ::-. '. Ci .• . --Et A vi:avrl.z- -•.. I i' • i • • ' Z.;.----_ ,A4.43,441fai•; J•••. II •G I • •. ' '7- , , t g. _; 0.• •- ..••• i:\,.\,. ! N. l. • .. 3 _i 1--I ,_. -..0 _ _____ --=,__.,--- ., - ,j,kr 4 filE • . . 1 •-• 1 _. -- • i .---- - -1 i:":-.-::, rzirk L 7 . • I • 4 r... . ,-- ,• - it."- I 67:::!C.:C-2ARD iliA.DS I ...-.-----__.pup 415I 147 11•7...!;"..;.T. 4". ..*-..-' --;4-.....I.'" ---1 :I ' _: 1 " OA SuaVES•J3ST a 11•II -4,..,...e. ..4 4 •,...44TE•41•15-24.ua 5_11 ._,I.,_ ,----2.--7---1-4 • , - MAHAN SU•4E• •I3 ST 4/5 10•11 I I , 44°.. .----- ; I • I I I ,I ,,„._..i 1_____:_.,• i Ir___47."''"' 44s, 'N., 20 ,2 54_ ,Si „..-52 . '1 14 ....1 ____A,,,,.,;jii.,,f., . \ ; , , • , ct --a._ _4--':;`___ •.44,`7 ,ii1,1 3 20..• 2C., 5 5C. 5C• i r____.....- 12_Ivr . i '''' • --•-... .yr.'\ rjr-li__--- __.LA'. -- J- z.,*i CITY : '-.:•-•- .-„,:___-___.1. ____.; -'--7...i_ --_-___,: ---- HALL . i • ;1 --` '• \ 2.-_ 7:„Fj<--.-.-t---P _____.._., : . (.7-1.-is... • - 1 •. 'y ; : 2• i _ i Y174-- I I 1 •---•- • 5. _ ------..1...-__ . , I ‘-------- -'7- *._.- 4D 15. 'rnnwt" 1"....• ,(.5- i 2•• 3c • 1 1 :"'" - f 35-1.• 323 i 3., ••• : -----' ' •t 0 ... ., 32 ..."'a___________ 4,;_ ______42 I CIA MCI.) EAST 24.1_715..A/tE_ &VD_ .' . . - ... .._ 4-4.la • x 44 •2) • • I . 22 2 20 4 a. • Oa 514 i 341 52 I 52• 4 503 ; 7C 5 31 j,t: 11 I ; I • I 3 la ' r 5•I L ! r74o-s- s01), 1 LI:iv tkitNi:, ... _• ‘,„ „v., .0•...4 60 . , ;PCt 6 , ...•31 oz. 1 1-j 1...... I 3' i so,i ip7-. i • 301 1 .. sos i--_ I ..... ! 3•A-•4-- • I T. .--7-.17----r--. 1 I / 'i '' ' t4P ..-----; . ,:t-• :• 2•3 1 Z \ -ij-----j I I r &en. a• . "C!.,11.1'4:: ?."! • I •5;I !. -r- _.-•-•-i_ 7. ..` ..._ _.z/._____...i.... I I 204 \••••••.........._____... . ....----.--•-... i 1. j,61 iitilk ' ..1 . -- --.------.. -.......„2...- 1 . it Ga _....,_ or-i---- i7-t---• H. . -,i-F .1 .• •E 1,---/ slim ,,;„ a r.„1. 1! I • I 20. 'rl`ii I I \\ JOHN A. F 04-7-.. iki I sa -... so.yiLlniti.p.,' 29 ! . .0...1 ChB-g D D A 1)0 W. IX 16E!G 7rft". i G5 • i I ,,,,, ,..,1 ,yetrz_mx,041•49 1 I MITI4 --• I _ .. ..b I • ! . 4.4 40 ---LT-SS- 2C2\ . a1E. I t315.-91.6- • - • • .2: .! •.I . \ •• -----O PE 1 - 0.-.3.•(.-4.';..... .1I tI.•7 --_---- I.;:s.';',....i . I • ; ---. ." i .1 r I / • - ______• 1 .„ - . . " . 1 v.,171,170.1 1 L ! • ! ____.= • swivc.• 4,4 SOS. , an.. nifl . 1 '77,--,-,-7 • Wr--•74 .... •' ...L .. •••• -----. a. 2•I I • I 2C . ---I 1 1 " I Ga. • .11----- -14L ...................1\ 1 f 4 • iiic-, •47- I I .CI I I I el 1 ' ) kt ri .1 ' .-• L ...,as . Z., pia 143a•i ••••• 1 11 .LDI 1 .1-41 ., 7 0. I .ar. . . • . ! ! ---.-1711( --. 1 rfr-ei- . , ,.. 1 _ I 1 1 1 1 ..--- ..../ ../foilh I 1 1 i - V, CO4iTimtv7a. LW, . 111- L • , I SO :WI,„,i.... ..g•61 -411 Ws..4 t• ' I etipi .4 I j ,, m...) .r.....!...rj 4.9 1 ... .'1 4.7:,.' • . ' •co ''.:' -iia'.:4 0''I'.• . "4. ..4 i 4 " ;r-- -•,. _.. .... ▪ .0.i •..... .7--•• 4 - ..irl 3-----., ! .... CA. ...V.... . . ....... \, ..___.• r.19 I• • t r _Li i i HoLLII NG S VI Olit 7 H . . f-.•;..- - • C - .\ :I 1254 sal rsa at a O 4 .0. ssa K..',KF;11 :40-DIEC NEM . ,.. 10-•a 1,„ s,) Oa A AK TRAeT LOCATION MAP 1,.,... .,_ . •,. .., , Air k.-/-1 ,-____---=-.-ro;.___1- . 142 Y. Z. i. i p: SiA-q L-z-Gi-r-7.. .--;---1 - t.:srt•Aar'•2103, • ..- . 1 is Al, - _-•••.'"-f : _ r � - TR BAIA 1.0 AC O ..0 TR 8A2 2.02 AC TR 8A 1.98 AC = 570 FO . Bear Creek Communities • TR 6A ( Z 4.0 AC Pond, Noah B. TR 6A1 1.0 AC "R-PUD" .:� • "AG" Kercho, Marvin Z /// 71 T 6► o SF20-B l ' z - 24 520 Ryan, S. L. Cc TR 68 TR 6C : I 9 AC - 1.0 p AC R • 1 TR 6F1 "AG" Ill "R-PUD" • 2.81 ? . 220 1.1 o v U. I "R-PUD" .. . I . N TR 6 • TR 6E 7.074 @ 2 0 a . TR "1A1 a_ .801 AC - tell -------'T— • , , WC 5e0 sossb I 737 •25 „ 15 14 Ii 1 I 1 il m/ 1 I iI I 13 . AI U.oi I TR ADJACENT OWN!RS &I, i,,ZONING 181 110-41-j,c24I 17 13 : p a 0 1.0 AC I� C R V 1.04 TR SA 2J 23 � 21 1121 II 4 AC 2.0 AC [ NO 1.05 • • • 0 ooc00 Oiii--9-9,o 1 EXISTING BUILDING FUTURE , OFFICES 1 12' X 50' LMOBILE BUILDING I FUTURE TWO STORY EDUCATION BUILDING / 20' X 40' FUTURE WORSHIP CENTER HORGAN BUILDING 11 350 Capacity [ 00 FUTURE PARKING a ' . COVERED O ARRIVAL ^1 C AREA oho O r K I 0 1 o . _ ________.______.__.__ _.___ 000, 00 -7r4t � tttt Church — v j\ o�R- F-, . , City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY 4 CASE NO: ZA 92-39 REVIEW NO: THREE DATE OF REVIEW: 12/11/92 PROJECT NAME: S .U.P. Request - First Baptist Church of Southlake South Carroll Avenue OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: First Baptist Church/Southlake 940 S . Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX. 76092 Phone: (817 ) 488-8698 Phone: Fax: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/7/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817 ) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . * The applicant appears to have met the requirements of our previous reviews . * This Concept Plan is for the approval of the S.U.P. request for the portable buildings shown. Another concept plan will be required with the zoning request for the rear of the property. This will cover all improvements proposed. * Denotes Information Comment cc: First Baptist Church/Southlake 1A-e • 4 .0.r • --- .....- ..-......ee....-.. •iv.610 IP!. �W4_,i '',2-^ .. r vNr�..s .. '1' •Ai[r f.4' u_a6x" s r`'i. , r ,,V:. ;rile w._^ [ I ,M' %.,� -;••, . . ' /MISTING.YLLGMG 7 1 .�1' I I L •• �rpKll. I li �1%;7i, • .,. , ram._ r11�jI ./ (f ' . '1 Y vt� fy G' Rf +r..S. '�" '�,'f1, - • _ . -'- eerrovndln•:ee.. �.. . I Il. I Ft'V< ^t�lot f'.%gTl',tt rlr•• _.._...•• r' wna.w ` .— . t%aY »~ ¢. '..1,::4'.tel,' L.1[. = apron L :i. I VO4... .y,.. • ..t �I iM1.�•' } rYTYRI TMO/t01[r et .....I' y•�;! >t' .'L^z r f.!; ".r F.r�. + v'1.•4.t.... �;P[.ti. souCArwR a„Ruwo .3� ZIW;' id•a''r. I • ±..,-�� . 1 Y' itv rpl_tY0.'r,.:'Ayr ., `•i.d 1 vtl•Ypnxf,••.i Y I�r4 }, • �a2n wllpten .. ._ruruwl WORM,Cl,rTgfl� . p,) .'• Tla — .. 1�{ +�.-l- [� NO G.AGTP ..t„ I ! c m ' af ' r� !!;j ; i w+ �,.T'• .�y'./1+..'. .f: • •:AI ,��,, 'tEY�'If Y-.w�, �wi. ".... • �j �� r' .✓V� '' y e 1 � ..-/ \ ^ IL' _qt 4,,_...,,,.-,...--...--.L`:�.' f , a- `S MI:tf•cm•4, • .>W/F•':f1t)klwf •i,.,. ':.'~`.,,�..:-.4-si' T:, , ! m -- �' : li Ilr. ..t•.,I�..r 1.,.... r..,urr ui. property �yf •J' .-j3,.•. • yyllII •' ..I.r IV•k%•_+.,' 'y._.,��,tlatil!: t it I \_— V ♦ .'f}'.1•.Q Mac' 7.'7 ,.I' .rJfi ,`'.. I JJ cuurvw r ;, —"0�c t. t t.�'...: n�•� + ''' 1 .;� ... I ._ `{ _ caurrau _ _ 'Rlll7l5�? -r�ti"'fl >• *fib, K, {: "+} i 'z `` frOM1t'9!0'.'14. .wK .R `iiSd r,:fi + 'fF i,i!- ytrrtiF,c !*-1••:,.,.;:± --. 'I —.__ti 'j x{r '~'�'�,:r'•',f,'�„r;�.y.. �?;f' 43'Z''`I?'....,•t:,i'�.L+•� 10' Buffer Yard., �,�ri}•+.rt-r,: �:i^ 'Tr,�,,X'�F y.._.,;a I 7. ' m - TIMARRON • i► M -'0 b..t...O i r,•I.,t.t i.n., II 1„.'.- ^-ti,{Q \/ 1 + Prepared by. I .1:4 ,t.,_ PRELIMINARY MASTER SITE PLAN Area ahorinl D.rtlet I, •. ^ "I _ bile C. Holloway Church property.d rlene.d ,II.I ' - iii"�t_ 9I0 s. C.,rroll Ave. derelopeent br Tl.erron, 111. y - lCAll 1••gp+d• sou[hl aka. „n92 I11I' •,)•;.''' 'I i1 I-- --- FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH „I_,„,., __.. r' II __ _j'---- 4011-01.914 • I. 'UM • �, �,.I N +1'!r''J _='- . '_ ., - -- r_ . 1L; f11 I: -�I - ^• 'I y 7h1.Concept Plan le for the te.porer/ Y„ ,I i i .i 1'`'' __y- ri.M_ / ' '! u..of portable building.(dlrnaion. L.+.• y,(:,;�•••� _— f'f^r� 1 • shows.Dove)to 6.lout.d behind a.l.tlog •'fir +I I •A..�•'. d+ 'j 1 1 f • t - • /:` building. The Concept Plan for the owe bulldlel ._4.•-r' 1 ],�,I'� . '.r.[{r •a 1 'II I s. g •• .•J "� :�� •'\t I \ { •: r111 be 111M la 1992 and 1.ehee.Mier. ••-•• \' '�' - �\ .. I - j 6` '\1'•1 ....._. r t/ '1.‘, !IT ��r �'L:L..• '' 1 I I— II ._. iv1)-�P.!\ ---` • .Yc'r: _`j,i� �1 i ' _1 A,NJ '�/. rA:\ i ..1 / f ' �', �4r ,t. / j. � .e lit ( .._ / d)d4,T .Kt.•k.,mr '6d R. l!-J /a�/J�/! •.,� -,,.,,•.',: Calse t Plan ICY SUecifc Use fisrmit __—-). j t nr•'::- e'fir •. 'e,>.. �� a`•.\.0 ;1.',',I.'. ___ .r y ` ♦ ,vA !%i '\fA • /C''_ t P ! ---- _ -'-fi•r. 1.-._ . f ii ',.I' ••.i.:1 — _. ' :,'I fj�... ./• ,.. .. -7- -Alf... -_.:•c •''. FIRST IS CARROLL Aru.n4 E �•,.'^;•�l - ....,, _1i7__:.iiil `fir ,�?.1.ji• ;'i''• '!ti.`ls ' ty ,:r,)3" SOUTHLAKE.TEXAS 76092 •;\ -•,:.--6 \..-.I-, ,,• ....�J•.".(':7-:.: !:L�.." 1 V.r ",'"-•-'';'.. - 1�,. ��` ...11, `' '`C TARRANT COUNTY '>' '!� 't L. +{ C•S I 11. 'S{r . .: .,. .! • ...•� ' 2.0 acree.more or less.with -_ , i...,G'; -�''•-.=•�_.•4' �'�_'!a 1;�'� I '�; • " o.I curet 6ern9 occupied (; .r N. j,'21 --'. 'K - •'' ',4,• .,• •{': by a.public road. f!.'�.. --- ,,.k.�.c,.. J.t?i - t E� ..`�I ? ! •' M ';.'tY. • TIMARRON —_�_ -- - ._ �.._�__��. ei r City of Southi. Tex s RESOLUTION NO. 92-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE A PERMIT FOR _THE LOCATION OF "��-'• • .4.;a}In .'w,., \tw� ,-g..,.it.,., .'n.4l--...'!„,w , 'w, ♦ �ww,,,,:, :.-.„..vw :„.... ,, R�E7 .:a,„-....,..:: {jh:.�w�tiYk'o+}:a:,.wC��w,.�,�� +3. ,,�, w•,whDb.\Y . ..-.... +��:.y`''� w - ror�<,a2}. tia:,,.': `K<w Est u. }}f�..�Yti��nY\l.\�w�}w...\��h':::��\�aA'.Yfi�}.+v. C.\ „v�..a'{� w , ;-....a •:a,;Ti yy.� w �:.SF 1;[ w w K•. twyw.. '-\ Y:'.; -:yak+:4\tat5 w\+w: w s.,,\: y'.:.. t+v". Ni"*wi,+w•:tdS} 'w\',ca:,•, .Sv:l..4.:i• •a,\. '£ci•: �7�}}:r`:r::::i•}:;.}.�}\,\<.r.: ::.;�}:::::E..�:,wti ..y:.:.waly w\:::}'.:+2:ac•:`,k:wV`..:�x:`>%4:3\i`>a)ri.}.,.}..}}w::y:•,.:w•:3*rXro,c.:a:-w`::vv}:bYP.'Ya.• x: xiR�� .:.::;.+�'JG.pi::.�k�BF'7G'^.:!tiff s#� syj: ��.:'- �:.. �..,,..:,+•::. :.t..,,,ti,• `:`^.}.:`:}��?ax},a::•::}:.,.,..a}.a•\`,�<Y. }r}: w w,a,.::>: ..:............:......:.............:.......:. w,:.::.:,}a:,,,,,•.,.a+a:;'y.,,-:?::::?:}.:-:;.::::.:a:::.:i•}•::ua:,:.,,.::.::::::..a+:.�ca:`::aa:.:::;aax•.}:.a.:;•:.:.: U# t� >< R to ORtT LE •: : AND • P OVI DING..AW FFECfiYV'E``.:anAT:E......:::::::;;::.::.::}}:}::.:::.::;.;:.:,::.}::::.;}f WHER a " ;'Specific Use Permit for the location of - 'pia ` lk . . ':;'tby a P has been requested person or cor-.ration having"-aaptopte--='', interest in the property describ- • n Exhibit "A" attached hereto; a • WHEREAS, the applicant has further requested .a variance .xViU ,.a:.w:ara} from the masonry requirement set forth in Ordinance No '; as amended by Ordinance No. 41-5 and .::.,:::.>:.::: ::TIF.REA , toe a P*.t .a.1t 4s f�hsr ret est r4 ver fr the Per zanent foundat a ::>:::.: i . . .::.. . :...:...:...:..:,> ...::...::.,:: . :.:: :.:.::::::::::::::::::::::..:..::.............,,.:........„ ::x...:.. u ce,„,,A:asiii;#5::forth:::>'�:.::::...:.. :.:;:. :.. :::; kii:. .: ..;.;: • IWHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and Cection 3 of Ordinance No. 311, as amended, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded a full and fair ' hearing to all property owners generally and to the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, . WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such specific use permit and variance ever is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals, aid"-general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the location of `: ° ? ympmwA ng: on the pro pert t.:;:::..� �.�.,::�,: ''�::�<:>�:�:::�•;: :.::� P Perty described in Exhibit. "A" attacfiec "}}hereto, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2 . 3 . �0.—/D `i Resolution No. 92-57 Page 2 SECTION 2 A t` is hereby granted to the �s- k 4K ,k Masonry Ordinance 'zo. 311 ; •, subject to the provisions con inc. • in the aforesaid ordinances and subject to the specific requirements and special conditions set forth in Section 1 above. The specific grounds or reasons upon which this is granted are: . 1. 2. I y. :•;::,y:.•:.y• >2;,::; aT w n:rru.�'+ti>.:wfi,•..+"::"".0tt*Y...y .' '"' o, \,Yts:a:rotx ..m:,»xy2»r.'•'•rC•:. T n mcr; > +r}xo >'a?:TTTTTTTY+T%'*Tr,.:{'•\Si:::+.T?i•.,;'<- ,:`S2�:i<�'i'^'k tii2;.�R\ {'• `n•,\Y;t 04.—A. :` " c.^wicT;i. '!.: ca4u..:tti;:ia;.\:atii{.tw+c w. +i2\yb ,.� %RY, >w1 tfi.+�;c�v .. °� vy e �:; ccs�rv4 •r .�..�k;:.. .;,c«•.•, ...fi„ •�:). ?s,. �\ �?- c� :C��.,.'•� �•,yS.,' �h't 4:. },y.Mt �.?;Cx4Y.. + •. ', ` 4,.. 4 . 'e :§4. mom.'. +`T•.- P ga r,. : b 4.. a" • .�.�..;,:::,':,:•..:•:::..`\:.. '++.ti-''tt`++::a•?.c•:•:,.�:..:`,+:2�:."t?:S: :v,.:•yn:...:r..+'.'C" �` RC•.. .�' •, ...,,,�� '•`:��c��:�: ��;;•.t•:y... .:...:..:.. \ y. �i.„C. ..`.,.. \.,. x S.\..2.:,?J.,..,.k`�\ ::\ �.:.;a`.CY\.�:. •"�d5...•. .•:$:....@,J1h a`•: r..: ...4.0;5 . Wit.{,.. ..„[` �+ 0 +�a•t �cr.:ti ,fig. y�¢+ { T:h is'`•:;`." + �' .: -.'.'�"' iTiivi:•'.^•. `Y17�^i:`'v' ::ff:K !F:F: 1P. ih:. jaw.yt.r..;•:.:•.:•�:•:r+::.:;•t•>• :otn.x?•:.:•.,....,.;,•i,:Tti',•,.,,•�,1-••.•..�•�.• +;,.;.;..: :��t�•�.:.: ;.,.t;,:.;. +,:`.`,:...;},;.....:{:>,tk:•::::t•::.h\`t?5.4i}ryvy::ri:n•.. .,:�n,t`•h.:,?•.a...,,..,:,;•):c,•:,,:w.\:t•>:fi:;n•:., :c;:`:'ct:f„ ;:,w•':;k:+`,••::•:,`,a`;::.,a::=;'.;;:S:C:sk.,,:..�.::....t::✓Sti`:.•„n,.a'ifiTJ3cY lig 241 SECTION 4 This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval of the City Council. • ' PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF , 1992. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas ' 92-57.strn/ORD-RFS/kb �6t'_ l ( City of Southlake,Texas - I MEMORANDUM December 7, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: IA 92-59 Final Plat REQUESTED ACTION: Final Plat for Stonegate Manor Estate, being 22.27 acres situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, Tracts 2F, 2F6, 2F7, 2F8, and 3B1A. LOCATION: 2930 Ridgecrest Drive, located on the west side of Ridgecrest Drive, South of the Kidwell Addition. OWNER: Plano Bank and Trust AGENTS: Ron Rodenberg and Bob Bronstad CURRENT ZONING: "AG," Agricultural LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: None required P & Z ACTION: December 3, 1992; Approved (6-0) subject to the November 25, 1992 Plat Review Summary. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Second Plat Review Summary dated December 9, 1992. KPG ge- I Via— -�-�I I •j _ 8- _ mR 1 - I i--\\ H THROOP • R-•PRICE 0 • Di . . • 1 M . - • v: � a- z'7 i t • •-ssz a�-�� - `— R PRICE ) If o!! • I I — __ Y YAHAFFEY - --- � • i ,!•,� to d• .. i-_ • 1 .r`-- -..-rL—..-... _�_.� \ `.-_ _I _ _ J WIZWE L.. \__ I r _... .__ 4 • .1 ....._•-..,, [ .\-c.... .t••••011 yr. MaIS •�t�; 'I •• J ' RO T [ ii : - / • a-�+ I a-OC] 0 J WIZWELL " _ — w _ _ J d• ♦ .s .• a � e�' .t. TARRANT / l r•D R'D DOUTHIT - 7 ,, .7- v._ a- ag � s � = ` � i.� Y l•• V�` • ,n t % /la•• •v /� _ i -! �- ; SyJoEr MIST 2S. i � \� . hi *as's\ \ , r- .,...•-•1 ,.... ] •:.•--.1.__, • Y ' 21•tz b' i____ . la Z IC il\ %C� EE _ ` oEw.4 111 • e `.]E�� rA771N .r, .U°v£.ASS/ .I.•.)• � > �i p / a. _• _..:__ , �:-]. � O � „ � ir.1f��•.c _ t so r •IST •.7501 aoS 'L�: t�. � 1� — IS =L. .: �?� H. o .]C. =s= sY•VEr.a M !•. , c _, ..aa1a � � t MOM - '�wC zl y-� raesr W.1' iCARMLL IS-1�_-- I --4 �n r cc — r-�7t' ,n. i ' or' Izr ! f 1 I y \ .• r I L .• . 1 ,.a ♦,•r7t 4.014 CI 704 . I. OM' •r s. .r2r Tj2 i. • I .` 2,e 1� p Joni0. — t >ZWM[1 4s1LP On - _---• - I • zo.• our _._ �Z• _••�- i OM I. /. i • 2 . •4 ..Y 11.1°I� L.IC 1 .' ! ! LARX7R1 IC CHEIVEZS A3�.LO1A CHOYERs 0 4 — .. • - •.I SWw£? 4IT re 300 flaw[?UST...zf. Sea - or -!► 6 .•I I ~ C�l1lo`C��. l TRACT LO' TlON a...., -,. :11 e n MAP ,I~ b F u I. I• k sol i7t�A \---- A A AC E (9:4 r. \. — — -+--- - - --�- - - V — V - , L.Ka IA a SpU .1. ... � N f �V7.... „ ''% _ , . .n e . . I .4' Ps s PP4e4 w 5A P 207epl,,p.° i —to I. U AAA III a.1 I •1 p6 cP d% 11°. . +qb P'SU 2p7 • •: 1 Kidwell, S.G. Qp II �.. U Kalee , We. I �� "SF-1" I \ Kidwell, S. LL /�:I I IOWE •. H� K Massey, Ml l l lam Earl K1� I' A �.... III Y I ' Morrie, D. VI I. a 1 '® • „� 1 1 •w a• I 'V"-' Scarmardo. Jo Ann Fryer /ia .AG" 4 I I 1 1 • I•• • "SF-1" IA ea IA NI II KCS SF-1" 1 "SF l" 1 �r , 1 "SF-1" a1.a .c • • .c u a .c \3;, MaNNey, Mllllam Earl 1Is 1iI„ In asI ..- Mitchell, 1 . "AG" ' 1• 11 • V •AC'1:3 • 381Ci111 „ CI C Gonzalez McPherson, I. — — SF-1 Na 111 ar• Ial.-I 1 l 7 31 .0 • • I c a All • "SF-1" I N: --______.-_--_- Sorg, Kenneth D. 781 Coke.. • 1X • u >t II SI AC Nelson, D. 1 Erikson. Scott R. II SA \ I a Conway, Lee F. McPherson, James I a IA .c II "AG" I lemensch ider J.I W. a Conway, S. "AG" s a u „ I . ICI E►g ,Malt Pletch r, •P• Sparks ,. ••.c. I �� `.\ I. "ea IC 1"AG' "AG' I .,I \ I„ ra). SKET IT G ./ . v . •• K , J� (II Ep5 I r• se'` ---- -- Th�e4er. IK. ISparke AV COO • I I Al .0 f r I Ar," a 1 5 350 1 VA.I Ir II Iu, A.' 1 l III .0 1 ': p' "AG" Compton, Eugenu I L./ 1 "AG.. I r• 111.1 r11 1a J u I 1 GA AC IA 1C1a1. j 1 . 1. Y — n . - 1 City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-59 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 12/1.0/92 PROJECT NAME: Final Plat - Lot 1, Block 1, Stonegate Manor Estate OWNER/APPLICANT: ENG/SURVEYOR: Plano Bank and Trust Thomas L. Thompson, R.P.L.S. 1105 W. 15th Street 1400 W. Euless Blvd. Plano, Texas 75075 Suite 102 Euless, Texas 76040 Phone: (214 ) 422-5000 Phone: (817) 267-9269 Fax: Fax: (817 ) 571-7959 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/8/92 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS . THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . 1. Label the existing R.O.W. at the southeast corner and show the continuation of the existing R.O.W. off-site to the south. * Original signatures will be required on both blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner' s dedications and notaries with original signatures on 8 .5" x 11" or 14" paper. * The 2 .5 acre tract to the west is land locked and was apparently subdivided with this tract from a larger tract. Staff recommends to the applicant that the applicant provide a common access easement to serve the rear 2 .5 acre property because it is our belief that the 2 .5 acre tract has a prescriptive right of access through this property due to the fact that both properties were subdivided from the same larger tract. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Plano Bank and Trust Thomas L. Thompson, R.P.L.S. - pp 6E'L • • BLOCK A KIDWELL ADDITION Rea. In Cabinet A, Slide 1134 I I Zoned Zoned ' I 1$O..or.n(Ul tiLot 5 SF-1A Lot 2R I I zonedI SF-1A 41R Dedicated for rood widening--N. _- .. - 41 . _ 15. udnly Eaum•=t N-167;05-28+E..907.73' .� - -•li 457.45' �_5•'- braT•—� '0.0111y�Eaeement 902.72' 1-- "_" —N a6'-Eli Fir E^� � � Lot 12-R- to 1 . Ri0.y. n W I I rl t b n • N> O _ w n f/ O w W o NBLOCK 4 SOUTH LAKE b Rec. In Vol. 388-1 z inn- rl O V! b n o bNWN VI LOT 1 J U BLOCK i W 'i 0m Q 1 N W 1 1- P D 22.256 ac 0 . 969,481 of - \ r zr Si R-473.41' Iv d L-285.75' b \A-34' 35' 00• z ZONED R-567.90' AGRICULTURAL Lx.30 05' 6- U 3 OS' 13" Dedicated for road widening •.m \ppowip•ieh _ =� ----- R=.450.0 J Rai C10' Drainage Utility Eoeement —" L-105.04' _ w'r Za 897.64' ' ' \ \ AC iVEV, A-320 '•— `•S' utility Easement N BC Sl' 54' W �• 505.84' �P'o•B• N 88'.46' 27' W - 929.81' ` Lot 3 SET STONE s EET ADDITION Lot 4—A 38B-97. P . 14 Lot 4-B N 88' 29' W •.. 63.49' Zoned C. A. SWEET ADDITION 26.28 ac AO Roc. In Vol. 388-180, Pg. 50 AMES SMctic PHERSON avie • Arlington, Tx 78013 Zoned Rec. In Vol. 2675. Pg. 37 AG FINAL PLAT LOT 1 , BLOCK 1 STONEGATE MANOR ESTATE AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A 22.35 AC TRACT IN THE R. D. PRICE SURVAY A-1207 City of Southlake, Texas CITY MANA ER MEMORANDUMII 'L December 7 , 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P . Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-I 1 Attached please find Ordinance 480-I which revises the zoning ordinance to correct inconsistencies between it and the Camping Ordinance No . 577 recently approved by the City Council . Ordinance No. 480-I revises Section 35 . 9 (c) to allow the use of recreational equipment for the purpose of living or housekeeping in a residential or agricultural area under certain conditions . This amendment also adds #36 to Section 45 . 1 to allow recreational campsites or campgrounds in the "AG" district by a Specific Use Permit. This revision to the zoning - ordinance should eliminate any conflicting language and should establish an avenue whereby a campsite or campground would be permitted to develop if deemed appropriate by the Council . On December 3 , 1992 , the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed Ordinance No . 480-I and recommended approval with a (6-1) vote. Commissioner McGrath dissented because he felt that the maximum number of out of town guest. ' visits should be increase• to six per calendar year. ji' , / ` OIL `"`1: � ll KPG %'`��I 8c AN 0 INANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, TH COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF S o UTHLAKE, TEXAS, BY REGULATING CAMPING AND PARKING OF . IAJOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES; PROVIDING , THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING F0R PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake,:Texas is a home u-Fe city acting un r its arter adopt . • the electorate pursuant to Ar ' I Sectio of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the Zoning Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake now deems it necessary to amend Ordinance No. 480, as amended, to specifically regulate camping and the parking of major recreational vehicles within the City of Southlake; and WHEREAS, .the City Council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the Zoning Ordinance as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 That Section 35.9 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Paragraph c thereof to read as follows: :lakc[[\campingl.ord Page I • h "c. Except as provided below, no such equipment shall be used for living, sleeping or housekeeping purposes when parked or stored on a residential or agricultural lot, nor in any location not approved for such use. Notwithstanding the above, major recreational equipment meeting the above parking requirements may be occupied by out of town guests for living, sleeping or housekeeping purposes no more than twice in any calendar year with the duration of each visit being limited to two weeks. SECTION 2 That Section 45.1 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding the following specific use thereto: SPECIFIC USE DISTRICT WHERE PERMITTED "36. Recreational campsite or campground AG SECTION 3 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 4 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases. clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction. such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences. paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. A %lake('\campingLord Page Ye -3 SECTION 5 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys. omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinarice No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting camping or the parking of recreational vehicles which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances. same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 7 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 8 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City of Secretary shall slakcll\campingl.ord Page 3 additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 2.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 9 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1992. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1992. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY slake[[\campingt.ord Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: slakeI[\campingl.ord Page 5 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM i December 9, 1992 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Chris Terry, Asst. to the City Manager SUBJECT: PARKS & LIBRARY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Attached is the final recommendation of the Parks and Library Task Force that the City Council formed in September 1992. The Task Force has spent the last four (4) months conducting research into the needs and desires of the citizens of Southlake with regard to improved park and recreational facilities as well as a possible expanded library system for the City. The Task Force has contacted a number of regional data sources in the course of their investigation such as area cities, the US Army Corps of Engineers, local baseball and softball associations, soccer leagues, and the citizens of Southlake. The findings of the Task Force rest on data gathered from a November 1992 survey instrument distributed to Aft approximately 2,000 homes in Southlake. The Task Force also relied on information contained in the City's Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan compiled in 1991. The Task Force made use of all these resources to determine the most feasible funding measures required to finance the recommended improvements. The Task Force will recommend that the City Council consider calling for voter approval of a .50 of 1.0 percent sales tax to pay for the expanded parks and recreational services. The Task Force estimates that such a local sales tax will generate approximately $250,000 annually in revenue to be used for parks and recreational purposes. Larry Goldstein chaired the Task Force and will present the findings and recommendations of the group to the City Council. Mr. Goldstein will also summarize the results of the survey relating to the kinds of recreational services that Southlake citizens desire. Mr. Goldstein presented the Task Force findings at a Joint Work/Study Session of the City Council and C.I.S.D. Board on Tuesday, December 8. Participants at this meeting heard a summary of the Task Force's proposed .50 of 1.0 percent funding mechanism as a possible solution to meeting parks, recreational, and library system needs. See attached materials . • I Southlake Task Force on Parks and Library On September 9, 1992, at the direction of City Council, a task force was formed to study the need for expanded parks and recreation facilities and the need for a library in the City of Southlake. Task force subcommittees set about to determine the priorities of the citizens, the cost of implementation, and the sources and methods for funding land acquisition and the construction of desired facilities. Southlake is a city comprising 23 square miles with an approximate population of 8,000 citizens. The city is growing rapidly with approxi- mately one new home permit issued each day. Our young people are actively involved in baseball, softball and soccer, programs using three existing lighted ball diamonds in Southlake's Bicentennial Park. There are four practice fields near Carroll Elementary School, as well as some S located on private property. Southlake citizens also use fields in Trophy Club. There are no soccer or football fields in Southlake. Southlake is presently sharing library facilities in Grapevine as part of an interlocal agreement that is due for renegotiation in 1993. There are no public library facilities in Southlake. As demand increases at the Grapevine Library, it is reasonable to assume Southlake will be asked to increase its share of the burden and provide library services to its.own citizens. • Grapevine, Colleyville, Coppell, Trophy Club and Keller are all experi- encing rapid growth and development. It is only a matter of time until Southlake will be asked either to match sports facilities for joint use with other cities or cease to use their facilities. A survey was sent to over 2,000 homes in Southlake in the Southlake City Newsletter in October 1992, asking for input for the task force study. Eight percent response was needed for statistically reliable results; the response was over ten percent. According to this survey and Southlake Task Force on Parks and Library l • the one conducted by Schrickel, Rollins & Associates in 1991, an expanded and new facilities "wish list" from the survey included: Trails Jogging, walking, skating, biking, equestrian Fields Baseball, softball, soccer, football Courts ( Basketball, tennis, volleyball Public Buildings Library, theater, arts & crafts, senior cit- izens center, auditorium, amphitheater Family Picnic tables, outdoor cooking, shelter, playground, boat dock, fishing pier, swimming The October 1992 survey results show a very unfavorable response to increasing property taxes for such facilities (97.1% no). Approximately 50% favored sales tax increase as a method of funding. Considering the survey was presented to the citizens with no preliminary public educa- tion, the level of favorable response warrants bringing the issue to the 11111 voters. Most respondents favored the City sharing facilities with the Carroll Independent School District. Conclusions With the present growth of the city population, the expected future growth and the corresponding growth in demand and the strain on existing facilities, the Task Force recommends that the Council: • Place the sales tax increase of one-half of one percent on the ballot in May 1993 in conjunction with the general city elections. • Encourage the Carroll Independent School District share school facilities and to allow construction of practice fields and playing fields for softball, baseball and soccer wherever possible on school property. Funds generated by the 1/2% sales tax should be used to help the school district with joint use recreation (sports) facilities construction and lighting. • Commission the design of a multi-use facility to include a library and amphitheater and adopt a timetable for implementation. Southlakc Task Force on Parks and Library 2 / 2eL - 3 • Appoint an independent Library Board. • Lease a portion of the Corps of Engineers land along Lake Grapevine within the Southlake city limits for additional park and recreational needs. TASK FORCEi;RECOMMENDATIONS • I. Immediate Needs We recommend the following to implement the desires of the citizens expressed in recent surveys at the earliest possible date (fall 1993 - fall 1994) after approval of the 1/2% sales tax to support expenditures. A. A minimum of one additional lighted baseball/softball "fourplex" and four additional practice fields be constructed. Current • projections are for a 70% increase in participating youths by 1994. B. A boat ramp, a fishing pier, and a swimming beach and related facilities be constructed on Lake Grapevine. C. A minimum of three soccer fields be constructed. D. Jogging, biking, hiking and nature trails 6' to 8' wide be laid out and constructed as right of way becomes available on Corps prop- erty and along several arterial streets, and in unimproved areas of the city (2-5 miles initially). • E. Additional playground/picnic facilities, horseshoe pits, badminton/volleyball courts and fitness areas be constructed on Corps property and on other acquired park lands. F. A committee be appointed to contact land owners for donations or sales of land suitable for new park facilities and expansion of existing park facilities. G. An architectural firm be engaged to design a multi-use facility to be constructed in stages and when funds are available, said facility to possibly encompass: • A general public library • An auditorium/theater/amphitheater area .0 • A recreation hall/kitchen-community building Soutthllakc Task Force on Parks and Library 3 /O2 - / p. • II. Long Range Needs A. Construction of the first phase of a library/community center. Pop- ulation projections suggest an initial facility of 7500 square feet con- structed in 1996 with eventual expansion, as dictated by growth, to a 15,000 square foot combined use building. B. Expected con1nued growth of the city and the corresponding number of participants in youth activities will require the following by the year 2002: • Four additional lighted baseball/softball fields to accommodate over 200 teams. • Twelve additional practice fields for baseball/softball. • Twelve additional combination soccer/football fields • Expanded network of small open space neighborhood parks with playgrounds. III. Funding Using current sales tax information from the city records, a 1/2% sales tax will provide approximately $250,000 annually in additional funds. This will support the maintenance/retirement of a $2,500,000 certificate of obligation. The task force recommends that $1 million be earmarked for park land acquisition and $1.5 million be earmarked for the imme- diate needs as outlined in section I. IV. Future Maintenance Funding Expected annual maintenance costs for the proposed facilities in section I should be approximately $150,000 after build-out. These funds cannot come from the monies raised by the additional 1/2% sales tax. But the city can expect as the population grows and a corresponding increase of retail sales occurs, additional regular sales tax revenues to provide a large contribution to the city budget for these maintenance expenses. Southlake Task Force on Parks and Library 4 V. Impact of Sales Tax Increase It is the opinion of the task force that the costs to the citizens of Southlake to implement these recommendations will be minimal. The impact upon a Southlake household purchasing taxable commodities within the city such as gasoline, dry cleaning services, flowers, videos and games, beer and maintenance services will be about $1.50 per month based on $300.00 month of expenditures in Southlake. In 1991 the City of Southlake averaged $42,500.00 per month in sales tax revenue. Based on approximately 2,310 homes spending about $3.00 per month in sales tax, the households of Southlake contributed only $6,930.00 of the total amount. This means that for every dollar a resident of Southlake contributes, non-residents contribute $5.00 to our city. As the expected. increase in retail establishments occurs, these ratios should still apply as our cross town street improvements will generate even more sales from non-resident commuter traffic. The impact on Southlake businesses, from a competitive perspective, will be negligible. Currently any business competing with Dallas firms enjoy a 1% sales tax advantage and at least a 1/2% advantage over most other Tarrant County businesses. The expected boom of retail growth in • Southlake will also be competing on an equal or better basis, from a sales tax standpoint, with other cities. VI. Conclusion The location of the City of Southlake along with the current direction of higher density residential zoning assures the predictions of population growth will continue. Along with this growth comes a natural demand for increased recreational and cultural facilities. With current and future demands of the school districts for increased tax revenue, citizens are very reluctant to approve increased property taxes to fund these • improvements, and yet, the citizens demand they be provided. The state statute provides that the sales tax can only be used for speci- fied recre al ation , cultural and municipal development and excludes such items as general city street and drainage improvements. The ability to leverage a 1/2% additional sales tax is the only rational alternative to provide the recreational and cultural facilities that attract home buyers and help existing residential property values. Southlake Task Force on Parks and Library 5 Soon after the Council approves putting the sales tax on the ballot for the May 19th election, a committee will be formed to promote the pro- posal to the citizens of Southlake for a successful vote on the issue. VII. Sources of Reference • • 1991 Parks, Rereation and Open Space Master Plan • 1992 Parks and Library Task Force Survey • Sales tax & population growth statistics from cities of Grapevine, Colleyville, Keller, Coppell, Hurst, Bedford • Section 4B, Article 5190.6 of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes • 1992 Bond programs: Cities of Colleyville and Grapevine • Parks Departments of Grapevine, Colleyville • US Army Corps of Engineers • Texas Library Systems Act & Rules for Administering the Library Systems Act • North Texas Library System • Southlake Baseball Association • Southlake Softball Association • Southlake Soccer Association • Southlake Task Force on Parks and Library 6 /Day - 7 Percent of total demand in response to the question: "What additional park and recreational facilities would you like to have in Southlake?' lir F N N W O �h O tit O fh O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c c c \ c c - �-- --- --•-- , I TRAILS TOTAL ' CENTER TOTAL (I) MEMM - • 0 SWIMMING TOTAL a' Az PLAYGROUND •••• TOTAL ;: , • nil I . .- BASEBALL TOTAL • " . N• n .01 - • a Golf Course III n co Picnicking Sites =" `• Mulitsports Complex i O CD 41111 O Equestrian SitesMI CV CI' 0 ARTS/THEATER - i%:^ ": TOTAL '-i• `p P' ,: Vo tI. VOLLEY/ _ ~ BASKETBALL t4 r.. ■ - � 3 C = Soccer Fields (p Po 11111 Rackctball Courts � -t Tennis Courts CI n Sand Volleyball Courts n "-t p- ------- ..--- - CD Water Sports0 Gazebo/Pavillion . • ' • Football Fields -_ - I - - - Y - - l• . - /Da - ' Percent of Citizen Demand and Percent of Proposed Budgets N W L.. Ui Cs, i CO �O lir ,,,Percent O O !rand O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRAILS TOTAL CENTER TOTAL 0 SWIMMING TOTAL i ►0 AD Y� PLAYGROUND TOTAL p ail BASEBALL TOTAL 1-3 + :n. Golf Course 0 n Picnicking Sites CD AD Mulitsports Complex _. SEquestrian Sites • n N CD ARTS/THEATER "3 TOTAL d CD VOLLEY/ a BASKETBALL 1 AD ty Soccer Fields ❑ 0 ■ C ' : • --. ,,.... y c cn t Rackctball Courts \ ' ►z C PI QN ..Y �' `� �" I a' .... Tennis Courts CD o C CD CD CD A, n = 'Y = rb n. I Sand Volleyball Courts r'* ►b e-P- p' ZD co ¢ � z c i b Cr) (I Water Sports 111 ( CD )b CD ( `� 0 CD tC AD Gazebo/Pavillion ED = r* ' '-I o C7 4111 2 Football Fields /D et, ` 9 a • Printed on 12/7/92 at 6:49 PM by RAJ File name : PARKS.XLS Southlake Parks and Library Task Force Comparison : Southlake Citizens Survey - Task Force Plan - 1996 Master Plan Improvement catagories items in CAPITALS are counted twice Totals Citizen Task 1996 Task 1996 From Survey Force Master Force Master Citizen Demand Budget Plan Budget Budget Plan Improvement Notes from Survey Results Survey Percentage % of Total % of Total Total S Total S TRAILS TOTAL Hike/bike 12.73 Nature 7.67 Fitness5.20 25.60% 27.12% 19.43% " 3.45% S210,000 S59,000 CENTER TOTAL Rec. 4.87 Teen Rec. 3.33 Senior 1.47 9.67% 10.24% 4.63% 0.00% S50,000 SO SWIMMING TOTAL Outdoor 4.67 Indoor 3.53 8.20% 8.69% 6.94% 0.00% S75,000 SO PLAYGROUND TOTAL Playgound 6.87 Handicap.07 6.94% 7.35% 3.70% 7.01% S40,000 S120,000 BASEBALL TOTAL Basball Filelds 4.07 Softball 2.87 6.94% 7.35% 39.96% 86.42% S432,000 S1,480,000 Golf Course 6.80% 7.20% 0.0• 0% 0.00% SO SO \ Picnic Sites 5.67% 6.01% ;3.70% 1.49% S40,000 S25,500 S Mulitsports Complex 4.13% 4.37% 0.00% 0.00% SO SO A Equestrian Sites 3.93% 4.16% 0.00% 0.00% SO SO 1 \ ARTS/THEATER TOTAL Performing 1.47 Cultural 1.00 Amphi.6 3.07% 3.25% 0.00% 0.00% SO SO VOLLEY /BASKETBALL BasketBall 2.00 Volleyball.73 2.73% 2.89% 7.40% 1.46% S80,000 S25,000 Soccer Fields 2.60% 2.75% 2.22% 0.18% S24,000 S3,000 Racketball Courts 1.87% 1.98% 0.00% 0.00% SO SO Tennis Courts 1.80% 1.91% 0.00% 0.00% So SO Sand Volleyball Courts 1.80% 1.91% 0.00% 0.00% SO SO Water Sports 1.20% 1.27% 7.40% 0.00% S80,000 SO Gazebo/Pavillion 1.13% 1.20% 4.63% 0.00% S50,000 SO Football Fields 0.33% 0.35% 0.00% 0.00% SO SO TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS LESS INFRASTRUCTURE (1) 94.41% 100.00% 100.00% S1,081,000 S1,712,500 Contingencies S262,244 Architects & Engineers S74,220 Library Site and Park Land S1,000,000 Parking and Roads S200,000 TOTAL S2,617,464 �� CA �-. 1-+ N N W W i. VI VI Vi O O CD CD O O O O O O O O O O O rir • (n CD O CD 0O O a, O O CD O O O O I I f I I I I I � • • • 0 Baseball 4 plcx,lighted • o o o N O Parking and Roads 0 o : . o H Bike and Hiking Trails AD v � • o ri Trails Nature-3 miles - ' o 0 1-11 �, 0 0 V / g Swimming Beach o CD o cn - Boat Ramp and Parking "0 1..14, Uj o Group Center(2,000S.F.) o ro 0d — o AD 69a Cl) CD Playgrounds(Four) `':S. o 40 : .,A 0 0 1.--4 Picnic Sites w/Shelter(30) a — o 0 cfl C Basket Ball Courts(6- o CD 1/2) i CD Volley Ball Courts o r+ 0o Cl) E Baseball Practice Fields ' N (4) o . . AD o Fishing Pier111 o ~ o \O CD .69 N W Soccer Fields(3) M o I 1 o F.-, 0 t� Fitness Course II oo EA sn Signage o 0 III __ cn Horseshoe Pits o 0 fpc. -// Printed on 12/7/92 at 5:44 PM File name: BONDI.XLS Preliminary Task Force First Phase Improvements Plan 1993-1994 Preliminary Budget for First Bond Offering 1993-1994 Facility Improvements Notes Group One Baseball 4 plex, lighted i $400,000 $20k/Field + 60k/lights + building Baseball Practice Fields (4) $32,000 $8,000 per field Playgrounds (Two) . $20,000 Located with other facilities Soccer Fields (3) '$24,000 No lighting Group Two . Boat Rampand Parking n g $50,000 50' x 60' Ramp and 100' x 150' Paving Fishing Pier $30,000 Located with Boat Ramp Swimming Beach $75,000 Includes concession stand Group Three Trails Nature - 3 miles -- $100,000$100,000 Includes signage Bike and Hiking Trails $100,000 Bicentenial park to Corp of Engineers Fitness Course $10,000 Located on Hiking Trails Group Four Picnic Sites w/Shelter (30) $40,000 Group Center (2,000S.F.) $50,000 • Horse Shoes Pits $1,000 Basket Ball Courts (6 - 1/2) $40,000 Half Courts @ shelter and Picnic Volley Ball Courts • $40,000 Lighted Playgrounds (Two) $20,000 Located with other facilities Signage $5,000 Landscaping Included Above Parking and Roads $200,000 Parking for 200 Total cars Architecutural Fees $74,220 Preliminary Library Plans Included Contigency at 20% $262,244 Will be allocated with planning - Library Site and Park Land $1,000,000 40 Acres Total Totals $2,573,464 /Da- -/L .-.. N W J-. V11r O� O CD CD O O O O CD CD O CD CD O O O O O O CDO O O O CDO O O O O O O CDO 1991 Keller hd -s o 1991 Collcyvillc 1991Coppcll �.. y CL 0 a 1991 Southlakc K ` 1 * •' y ' � rd e--t- .ty n CID co a SID n O r-r a: = CD y y 1996 Southlake -1 co a AD 0 2001 Southlake ,�A�y N 1- o 0 . CD 2006 Southlake 5 Z 2011 Southlake r-t- pr• Build Out Southlake ► ;''..:•` : AD 1-1 i O . L..i• 1991 Hurst CD Cit •-"r�ry.s..,,r;� 4'4:1:} y'• r's� r".s�!ag y;• .•y'. �t d (—I, CD al 1992 Grapevine (Y 1992 Bedford " . /pa- —/3 f Printed on 12/7/92 at 6:24 PM by RAJ File name: SALESTAX.XLS Southlake Parks and Library Task For Annual City Sales Tax Income - Historical and Projected Projections based on Population growth and increased Retail propelled by Population Density Increase Density_ Tax City People/ Per % of Population /Density per Acre/Sales Tax per person Year Population Area Acre City Sales Tax Capita Buildout Keller Pop.11628 1.15People/Acre $39/Person 1991 13,319 11,628 1.15 $512,807 $39 Colleyville Pop.12724 1.8People/Acre $55/Person 1991 12,724 7,744 1.64 $700,609 $55 Coppell Pop.7500 .86People/Acre $78/Person 1991 7,500 8,761 0.86 $586,030 $78 & 1991 Southlake Pop.7654 .5People/Acre $67/Person 1991 7,654 13,760 0.56 $510,000 $67 16% 1996 Southlake Pop.11292 .82People/Acre $67or$70/Person 1996 11,292 13,760 0.82 $794,250 $70 23% 2001 Southlake Pop.15839 1.15People/Acre $67or$75/Person 2001 15,839 13,760 1.15 $1,187,431 $75 33% 2006 Southlake Pop.21295 1.55People/Acre $67or$81/Person 2006 21,295 13,760 1.55 $1,714,804 $81 44% 2011 Southlake Pop.27600 2.01People/Acre $67or$87/Person 2011 27,600 13,760 2.01 $2,399,771 $87 57% BO Southlake Pop.48268 3.5People/Acre $67or$108/Person 2035 48,268 13,760 3.51 $5,212,944 $108 100% Hurst Pop.33574 5.17People/Acre $158/Person 1991 33,574 6,528 5.14 $5,292,936 $158 Grapevine Pop. 30392 1.41People.Acre $121/Person 1992 30,392 21,120 1.44 $3,680,823 $121 Bedford Pop.44138 6.57People/Acre $73/Person 1992 44,138 6,720 6.57 $3,227,566 $73 Printed on 12/7/92 at 5:55 PM by RAJ File name: GRAPVINE.XLS Southlake Parks and Library Task Ford Grapevine Sales Tax Revenue Historical Analysis Southlake Parks and Library Task Force Density Tax People Per City Year Population Area Per Acre City Sales Tax Capita Notes Grapevine 1981-2 11,801 21,120 0.56 $1,166,430 $99 ---- Grapevine 1982-3 13,660 21,120 0.65 $1,224,533 $90 * Grapevine 1983-4 15,519 21,120 0.73 $1,600,823 $103 * Grapevine 1984-5 17,378 21,120 . 0.82 $2,046,884 '• $118 * Grapevine 1985-6 19,237 21,12.0 0.91 $2,280,083 $119 * Grapevine 1986-7 21,097 21,120 1.00 $2,269,586 $108 * Grapevine 1987-8 22,956 21,120 1.09 $2,496,958 $109 * Grapevine 1988-9 24,815 21,120 1.17 $2,806,033 $113 * Grapevine 1989-90 26,674 21,120 1.26 $3,096,983 $116 * Grapevine 1990-1 28,533 21,120 1.35 $3,276,213 $115 Grapevine 1991-2 30,392 21,120 1.44 $3,680,823 $121 1981-91 Population Increase is 158% 1981-91 Sales Tax Income Increase 216% 1981-91 Sales Tax Income Per Capita Increase 23% * **nto tt,n nnn'eiatinn f c',trer ho. " heen 'xtranolated for the years between 1982 and 1990 City of Southlake, Texas (' MEMORANDUM December 9 , 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Drainage Easement and Agreement with Michael Benton • In Phase V of SouthRidge Lake 'Subdivision (SRL) , a portion of this • phase drains to Shady Oaks, travels south approximately 450 feet and crosses Shady Oaks at an existing 36" RCP. The 36" RCP is too small for existing flows much less additional flows created from Phase V of SRL. The Drainage Ordinance (Section 6. 07b) requires that if no capacity is remaining in the existing drainage structure the developer will be responsible for making the necessary improvements. The developer can be reimbursed for the improvements on a pro rata basis by other developments that occur in that watershed. The City is responsible for procuring funds from other developers that develop in that watershed. There is a five year time limit on collecting these funds. Arvida, SRL's developer, has designed improvements (see attached map) to provide for the drainage in that watershed. To properly drain this basin, additional piping will be required across Shady Oaks. The existing drainage flows at a skewed angle across Michael Benton's property without benefit of a drainage easement. Mr. Benton has requested that the new pipe improvements be moved to the south approximately 36 feet so that the water will flow perpendicular to his property. Attached is the agreement that Mr. Benton requested and the drainage easement. The city attorneys revised the agreement based on Mr. Benton's requests. One of Mr. Benton's requests was to grant the City a drainage easement for only the area that the proposed improvements will be constructed upon (25' x 120' ) . The City Attorneys advised staff that the easement needs to extend the entire width of Mr. Benton's property. On Monday, November 23, 1992, John Levitt, Curtis Hawk and myself met with Mr. Benton to discuss the easement traversing across the width of his property. Mr. Benton has indicated that by Friday, December 11, 1992 he may have an answer. He has a third party that is supposed to advise him this week. Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Drainage Easement and Agreement with Michael Benton December 9, 1992 Page 2 The agreement states that all improvements will be installed as per the plans and that the developer will pay for those improvements. The agreement also states that the City will be responsible for repair of any damages to the property caused by any increased flow of water over the property with the exception of the 100 year storm. This may sound onerous for the City but Mr. Benton insists. on its inclusion. The Council.must recognize that anytime the City authorizes a change in existing drainage systems or patterns it is also possible for the City to be"brought into litigation if future flood damage occurs. Staff has discussed the agreement with the city attorneys and find the agreement acceptable. Please place this on the December 1 agenda for consideration by the City Council. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me. 1 � 406 MHB/lc Attachments: Drainage Easement and Agreement c:I wpfilestmemos%benton2 eas I Sou c ,"e .....,('.t I:e Phase V . • • 4r WITH 6 X 6•WIRE ti 7.5 ACRES 'aI Icel I TYPE -HEADWAL{ • • RELAY EXISTING 30" RCP & ADD I o " ►7 1 I W CUAR.RRAIL Fl U5 659.0 FURNISHED CBY(45 CITY F' I $ I I� Ohl SIDES REMOVE EXISTING CULVERTI gN I Ig as O $ O N O n A I IL, ---\ ill i • 2 _36' RCP o 1.Oxl II - _-_ - ---' --' -- ` (I(I "--� EXISINC PAVEMENT H U RECRADE'EXISTING CHANNEL ��TO MATCH EXISITNO GROUND k S00 / SHADY OAX DRIVE ----X-- . .. X------ - t - -----X------X------X----- 12�/IB' ROCK RIP-RAP ~ :.: WITH TREVIRA SPUNBOND I 12� 18' ROCK RIP-RAP TYPE '8' HEADWALL _ TYPE 1125 WITH 1125 SPUNBOND I TYPE 1125 FL DS 658.6 / X I . I I 4:1 SIDESLOPE I I I S) I X I LOT 10, BLK 1 I' 1 LOT 1, BLK 1 y /�•� SOUTHLAKE ESTATES I I SOUTHLAKE ESTATES I 0(� VOL 388-75, PC. 8 I VOL 388-75, PG. 8 BERMUDA SOD- I I 4, 657.2Y\\\\\\\\ V \\\FF 657.9 v( I' II ZS� } .\� EXISTING ^s^s 1 HOUSE N x 411,0 u 2 ♦ S . 13e hI'ok� l rac )- • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE } DRAINAGE EASEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That I, MICHAEL N. BENTON, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by Grantee herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, have granted, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, sell and convey to the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, Grantee herein, of Tarrant County, Texas a permanent and perpetual easement for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, altering, replacing, relocating, and operating drainage improvements in,. into, upon, over, across and under that .land in Tarrant County, Texas, described as follows, to-wit:, a 25 foot wide permanent drainage easement as more particularly described in attached Exhibit "A" setting forth the metes and bounds description and attached Exhibit "B" setting forth the graphic depiction, together with the right of ingress and egress as necessary for such purposes. In conjunction with the conveyance of the permanent drainage easement herein, Grantor does further grant, sell and convey to the City of Southlake a twenty foot (20') wide permanent access easement, as more particularly shown on attached Exhibit "B", from Shady Oaks Drive to said permanent easement for any and all purposes, including maintenance of the permanent drainage easement contained herein, that the City of Southlake finds necessary. Grantor covenants and agrees that Grantor and Grantor's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns shall.at no time erect, place or construct, or cause to be erected, `\ placed or constructed in, into, upon, over, across or under any easements granted herein any temporary or permanent structures, and it is further agreed that Grantee shall have slake\casemcnt.02 1 the right to excavate and fill upon said permanent easement and to remove from said permanent easement, any fences, buildings or other obstructions as may now be found upon said permanent easement. Grantor has this day additionally granted, sold and conveyed and by these presents does hereby grant, sell, and convey to Grantee an additional contiguous temporary construction easement for a period of one (1) year for the purpose of installing drainage improvements on the property known and described as follows, to-wit: a temporary 50 foot wide construction easement immediately adjacent to the above-described permanent easement in a configuration as shown on the attached Exhibit "B." Such temporary easement shall include the right to excavate and fill upon said temporary easement, but Grantee shall replace any fences or other fixtures upon said temporary easement without cost to Grantor, and shall restore the property, the subject of the } temporary construction easement, as nearly as possible to its condition prior to entry thereon. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described permanent easement, together with all and singular, the rights and appurtenances thereto, anywise belonging unto the said • Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and I do hereby bind myself, my heirs and assigns, to warrant and to forever defend all and singular the premises unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim same or any part thereof. EXECUTED this the day of , 119 Grantor (f .� slakc\casement.02 2 SINGLE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority in and for said County, Texas, on this day personally appeared MICHAEL N. BENTON known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this day of , 1992. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission Expires: -.1 Type or Print Notary's Name S1 slake\easement.02 3 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS • § COUNTY OF TARRANT § I, , County Clerk of the County of , do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument of writing dated on the day of , 19 , was filed for record in my office on the _ day of , 19 , at o'clock _.m., and duly recorded this day of , 19 , at o'clock .m. in the Records of said County, in Volume on pages WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE COUNTY COURT of said County, at office in , the day and year last above written. County Clerk, County, Texas By: ' ! Deputy • Ir slake\easement.02 4 DRAINAGE AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT§ This agreement is entered into between Michael N. Benton ("Property Owner") and the City of Southlake, Texas ("City") for drainage construction on property located at 615 Love-Henry Court, Southlake, Texas. WHEREAS, Property Owner is the sole owner of a tract of land located at 615 Love-Henry Court in Southlake, Texas (the "Property"), which Property is situated at the intersection of Love-Henry Court and Shady Oaks Drive, within the City of Southlake, Texas; and WHEREAS, the developer of Southridge Lakes Phase IV ("Developer") to the west of Shady Oaks Drive is currently in the process of constructing drainage improvements in conjunction with the development of said subdivision; and WHEREAS, the natural flow of water currently flows from the west side of Shady Oaks Drive under and across Shady Oaks Drive and onto the Property in the area of an existing RCP drainage pipe which traverses Shady Oaks Drive; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner has requested that the Developer remove the existing RCP drainage pipe underneath Shady Oaks Drive and construct two new RCP pipes further to the south underneath Shady Oaks Drive in order to direct the flow of water onto the southern portion of the Property, whereupon the water will again eventually flow into the natural drainageway across the Property; and WHEREAS, Property Owner has executed a drainage easement to the City authorizing the construction and maintenance of drainage improvements at a location slake\eascmcnt.01 Page 1 /�% - 7 ) parallel to and south of the existing fence dividing Property Owner's residence from the remainder of the Property in order to accomplish the above purpose; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner hereby agrees to provide an access easement from Shady Oaks Drive to said permanent easement to the City of Southlake for any and all purposes, including maintenance of the permanent drainage easement and the drainage improvements contained therein, that the City of Southlake finds necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: 1. Property Owner hereby consents to the construction of two 36-inch RCP pipes underneath Shady Oaks Drive adjacent to the drainage easement. Property Owner hereby further consents to the construction of a drainage swale which will be excavated and will extend approximately 120 feet onto the Property and within the drainage easement. The drainage swale will be filled with rock rip-rap for approximately the first 30 feet and the remaining approximately 90 feet will be sodded with bermuda grass. The drainage water will be permitted to flow southeastward upon exiting the drainage pipes under Shady Oaks Drive and the rock rip-rap in the drainage easement. The cost of the above construction shall be borne by the Developer, at no expense to Property Owner. 2. The City will be responsible for repair of any damages to the Property caused by any increased flow of water over the Property. Property Owner will be responsible for normal maintenance, such as mowing, within any portion of the drainage easement which is left in its natural condition and not otherwise improved with structures, in accordance with the City of Southlake's drainage ordinance. 3. The Developer will fill and sod the existing drainage area after the new drainage area is constructed in accordance with this agreement. slake\easement.01 Page 2 leTh 4. The City represents to Property Owner. that the drainage improvements covered in this agreement will allow for the adequate flow of water without any water damage to the residence on the Property excepting the 100 year event rainfall. In the event that, as a result of the improvements covered in this agreement, normal rainfall poses a threat to the residence on said Property, the City will take immediate corrective action at its sole expense. This agreement is executed this day of November, 1992. PROPERTY OWNER Michael N. Benton CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: • City Manager ATTEST: City Secretary City of Southlake, Texas 1 slake\eascment.01 Page 3 /1�� 9 • STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority in and for said County, Texas, on this day personally appeared Michael N. Benton, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this day of , 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission Expires: Type or Print Notary's Name slake\easement-01 Page 4 y City of South lake, Texas G R MEMORANDUMa la J J — December 8, 1992 TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Agreement between Mr. David C. Hardy and the City of Southlake pertaining to condemnation of a drainage easement to serve the proposed Stanhope Addition. Attached you will find the above referenced agreement with Mr. Hardy. This has been prepared by the City Attorney' s office. Please place this on the next available City Council agenda for their consideration. GL/gh DOCUMENT: STANHOPE.M3 FOLDER: PLANNER FROM : PHONE Na : 214 393 5993 Fa ,. November 18 , 1992 Mr . Gary Fickes • Mayor of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave . • Southlake , Tx. 76092 • Dear Mr . Mayor , On Tuesday of this week . Mr . Moore , his attorney, and I met at Joe ' s business location , for approximately 11 hours , and again today we met for a short time . Following is a summary of each of these meetings . In the first meeting , Mr . Moore outlined his requests , which included $50 ,000 cash , an enclosed drainage system (at ap- proximately $49 , 000) , a diversion of the street (at one time , he suggested aiming it at his neighbor ' s property to the East ) , a retention pond on our property . and a retainer wall in front of his property, which he estimated at about $8 , 000 . I would estimate the costs of his requests to be between $125 , 000 and $150 , 000 , in addition to the loss of a lot . After considerable discussion . he lo-rered cash request to $30 ,000 . When I asked for his rationale . he suggested that it was a happy medium between the Mayor ' s suggestion . • of $20 ,000 and his original request of $50 , 000 . I chat • - longed that statement attributed to thb Mayor . . . Unable to make much progress , wR agreed to meet •again: today . ' Joe and I met without Mr . Walter , his attorney . He stated ' that we were so far apart , that there probably wasn ' t any- thing to talk about . I asked that he allow me to share some research that I had done since the last meeting. Besides some information that I got from Greg Last , as to what the city would require with regard to the drainage system and fence ,- I advised him that I had consulted with 4 different:. appraisers , in addition to an attorney that specializes in condemnation suits, . I had suggested in they first meeting that we Ilse an apprcci - ser , since none_ or us really knew what the evaluation should he . ' Mr . Moore and his attorney would not c:cnsider an out- side opinion . r , / Today , I explained to Joe that every one of the appraisers indicated that easement value rarely exceeded the value of fee simple , and that generally it was half or less . One told me that I ' would he a fool to offer more than the value of a fea simple transaction ' . Based on this , I told Joe that I was prepared to offer him $8000 . I told him that it appeared , at most , that we would require . 27 ac.te , although it would likely be somethiny less . Based on current property values , it would appear that $8000 would exceed an appraised value , even iE we needed the entire . 27 acre , and gave him 100% of fee simple value . I reminded him that we wore not buying the property: . and that he could still sell the land in the future . Joe indicated to mP that he wasn ' t interested in my money, that , al. 1 along, it was just the concern for safety , liability , and their way of life that was important . He said he didn ' t want us in the area , and that he would de fend his property , as is , to the end . He stated that he wouldn ' t just use orthodox legal methods , but that he would resort to any and every possible means at his disposal , in eluding, some underhanded venues , if necessary , to prevent us from proceeding . I suggested that he sounded threatening , to which he did not reply . He stated that they did not want the environment to change , that they wanted it to remain until their daughters graduated , and that then he would consider moving . I suggested to Joe that it was difficult for me to accept his new stance , since two days earlier he would have accept- ed cash to grant the easement - In the middle of my response , Joe got up and loft , stat.ing that any future communication should be through his attor- ney . I have had three meetings with Joe , prior to today ' s , and in every one of them we were able to conduct an amiable dis- cussion and leave on a rti iendly."biasj.s . In each case he has come back with a reluctance to netgo`tiate further . leading me to believe that there is strong resistance in his hometead . At this point , 1 .scc no alternative to proceeding with con- demnation . • Si cerely Uh-A. . . David Hardy • . roc Mr . Jr ;, r'4nnre / e--3 ' Y FROM PHONE! NO. .: 214 393 6993 P( • • November 18 , 1992 . Mr . Joe Moore -~t . 1911 E . Highland Southlake , Tx. 76092 Dear Joe , Confirming my offer at our meet:in0 today. I am prepared to increase our cash offer to $8 , 000pineaddition to providing some protective posts on your property , at the end of our street , and to Fry, where possible ;' to replace any tree.^, that you would lose with trees from across, the road that 're would otherwise destroy . If you wish to pursue this offer , plehse contact me in writing at the address indicated below. Based on the data that is spelled, hut in the enclosed. letter to the Mayor , I feel that this esDeeds the fair mar!cet vat:- ue of the easement . • S ' ncerely , • • David Hardy . . • • h • . • • 519 Raton Pass . Irving, Tx. 75063 . . • .cc Mayor Gary Fiches , Mayor of Southlake =IELDING , BRF'RETT TEL : 317—55J_3g5 j Oct 27 9 1� ' ��' hJo . 11J G' AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this day of , 1992 by and between THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ("City") and DAVID C. HARDY 'Hard'). Hardy is desirous of developing an addition to the City of Southlake called Stanhope Addition. In connection with that development, City has required that drainage improvements be constructed downstream from the property to be developed by Hardy, The property where the drainage improvements are required is owned by Joe Moore ("Moore"). Hardy has negotiated with Moore in an effort to purchase a drainage easement on Moore's property but has been unable to reach an agreement with Moore. Further, Moore has refused to allow Hardy to go on to his property in order to survey the proposed drainage easement, Because Hardy has been unable to acquire a drainage easement on Moore's property, Hardy has requested the City to condemn a drainage easement on Moore's property in order to permit the development of Stanhope Addition. City has agreed to condemn a drainage easement on Moore's property upon the condition that Hardy pay all costs and expenses of City incurred in connection with the condemnation proceeding, including, without limitation, the costs of acquiring the easement and legal fees. Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. City agrees to initiate and pursue condemnation proceedings against Moore whereby City will acquire a drainage easement upon the property owned by Moore AGREEMENT paw t tsouthIs age n- t -)7 ,a , 15 p o IELDIN B RETT TEL : 1-117-50-3953 sufficient to permit the development of Stanhope Addition. 2. Hardy agrees to pay all costs and expenses of the City incurred in connection with such condemnation proceedings. Included within such costs and expenses are costs to acquire the drainage easement, all damages assessed or awarded by a court, if any, for diminution in the value of the remaining property from which the easement is condemned, the costs of any temporary easement that may be required, attorney fees and expenses associated therewith, court costs, expert Witness fees and expenses and any other costs and expenses associated with the condemnation of the drainage easement. 3. To secure the payment of the costs and expenses referred to herein, Hardy agrees to provide an irrevocable letter of credit. The Ietter of credit shall be in substantially the form of Exhibit "A attached hereto, shall be in the amount of$20,000.00 and shall be issued, by a national or state banking association approved by the City. The letter of credit shall expire not sooner than one year from the date of issuance and shall be renewed as necessary so that the letter of credit shall remain effective until at least sixty days after the condemnation proceedings referred to herein have become,final and not subject to further appeal. Any necessary renewal shall occur at least thirty days prior to the then current expiration date of the letter of credit., and the failure to timely renew the letter of credit shall constitute an event which shall permit the City to draw upon same. 4. On or before the 10th day of each calendar month, the City shall submit to Hardy a billing invoice itemizing all costs and expenses incurred by the City in connection with the condemnation proceedings during the previous month. Hardy shall pay to the City the amount of each such invoice within ten days from the date shown on the invoice. In the event Hardy does not pay any invoice within that time period, such failure shall be an AGREExuarrr Pate 2 ‘etoontblak_agr / y .IELDING . BARRETT TEL : 31 SaJ-39-3 Oct ,, ,Q2 15 :ti ' No . :JO : p is event which shall permit the City to draw upon the letter of credit. 5. Hardy agrees to pay all damages that may be awarded by a court to the owner of the property condemned including without limitation, damages for acquiring the drainage easement itself, damages to the remainder of the owner's property, damages for any temporary easer lent and any other damages, costs, or expenses awarded by a court against the City. In the event the condemnation proceedings should be terminated prior to their conclusion for any reason whatsoever, Hardy agrees to pay in addition to all other costs and expenses referred to herein, any penalties that may be assessed against the City by reason of such early termination. 6. This Agreement and all documents ancillary hereto shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. A. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements, whether written or oral, arrangements or understandings, relating to the subject matter hereof, and may not -be altered, amended or modified except in writing signed by the parties hereto. B. The terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement may be waived in individual instances by either party, but only by written instrument executed by the party waiving compliance. The failure of either party at any time or times to require performance of any provision hereof, or to insist that time is of the essence in connection with such performance, shall in no manner affect the right of the party at a later time to enforce the same. No waiver by any party of any condition or the breach of any demand, covenant or provision contained in this Agreement, whether by conduct or otherwise, shall be deemed to be construed to be a waiver of any other condition or the breach of any other term or covenant under this Agreement. ADREE MJ (r Pate 3 \eigkacutthlaiLagr /�� 7 •=IELOING, BARRETT TEL : 317-550-3953 Oct 27 ,92 15 :52 No .308 P .Oci C. In the event of any dispute under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs. D. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective parties, their legal representatives, successors and assigns. I .. EFFECTIVE on the date first shown above. CITY: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BY: ITS: HARDY: DAVID C. HARDY A a.PBMExr Pagc 4 .FIELDING . BARRETT TEL : B17-550-3953 Oct 27 .92 15 :52 No .008 P . 10 ERREVOCABLE LEVIER OF CREDIT NO. DATE: FOR ACCOUNT OF: David C. Hardy (Address) — TO BENEFICIARY: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 NORTH CARROLL AV EN U E SOW'HLAK F,, TEXAS 76092 AMOUNT: EXPIRATION DATE: Gentlemen: We hereby establish our irrevocable LETTER OF CREDIT in, favor of the City of Southiake, available by your sight drafts at bank name and address on us and accompanied by the following documents: 1) The original of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 2) Sight draft signed by the mayor or city manager of the City of Southiake, drawn°on us bearing the clause "drawn under Letter of Credit No. ". • All drafts shall be, with appropriate insertions, in the form of Exhibit A to this letter of credit. We hereby engage with you that all drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this credit will be duly honored if drawn and presented for payment at this office on or before the expiration date of this credit. Sincerely, /lame of Bank BY: Authorized Signature TITLE: ‘esesanhlatJoc • ,=IEL,DING , BARRETT TEL : 817-550-3953 Oct 27 ,92 15 :52 No .J08 P. 11 SIGHT DRAFT TO: (Bank Name and Address) , 19____ On sight, pay to the order of the City of Southlake the sum of. Credit No. dollars. This draft is drawn under Letter of CI-1'Y OF SOUTHLAKE • (Mayor or City Manager) STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT THIS instrument was acknowledged before me by of the City of Southlake, on behalf of the City of Southlake, this day of , 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission Expires: Notary's Printed Name: cgguoiith=tsdr • EXHIBIT A TO IRREVOCABLE LET[ER OF CREDIT NO. /C-/O is- City of Southlake,Texas CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM ! /z December 8, 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 92-55, Authorizing the City Attorneylto proceed with condemnation of a drainage easement across Mr. Joe Moore's property. Attached you will find the above referenced resolution seeking City Council authorization to proceed with the condemnation action on the Moore property. Please place this item on the next available City Council agenda for their consideration. GL/gh Attachment: Resolution No . 92-55 DOCUMENT: STANHOPE.M4 FOLDER: PLANNER id -/ .. RESOLUTION NO. 90./ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO BRING A CONDEMNATION ACTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN CONNECTION, WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF STANFIOPE ADDITION WHEREAS, David C. Hardy has submitted preliminary plans for development of a new addition to the City of Southlake to be known as the Stanhope Addition; and WHEREAS, in connection with`those plans, the City has required the construction of a grade-to-drain channel downstream from the property to be developed, which improvements are necessary to preserve and protect the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the downstream property owner, Mr. J.G. Moore, will not grant permission to install these improvements; and WIIFREAS, there is currently no drainage easement in the area of these improvements and an easement will he required to construct these improvements; and WHEREAS, both Mr. Hardy and the City have attempted in good faith to negotiate the acquisition of a drainage easement across Mr. Moore's property; and WHEREAS, the City and Mr. Moore have been unable to reach an agreement on the acquisition of this easement; and WHEREAS, the City Council now deems it necessary to authorize the City Attorney to initiate condemnation proceedings on the property of Mr. Moore in order to allow the proposed drainage improvements to proceed; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hardy has entered into an agreement with the City to pay all costs and expenses of the City incurred in connection with the condemnation proceedings, 1 ILL : t _ ' , 15 : 52 No . �n�: c r i including without limitations, the costs of acquiring an easement and legal fees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of The City of Southlake, Texas: Section 1 The City Attorney is hereby authorized to bring a condemnation lawsuit for the purpose of acquiring necessary easements in conjunction with the development of Stanhope Addition, including an approximately thirty-two (32) foot wide permanent easement for the purpose of locating, relocating, extending, constructing, reconstructing, improving, maintaining, repairing, and operating drainage improvements, together with such appurtenances as may be necessary, and an adjacent approximately fifteen (15) foot wide temporary construction easement for the purpose of construction access to the drainage eascmernt. Section 2 The agreement with Mr. Hardy for payment of all costs and expenses of the City incurred in connection with the condemnation proceedings, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution, including, without limitation, the provisions requiring Mr, Hardy to provide a letter of credit in favor of the City, is approved. Section 3 The City Council finds that such improvements in this condemnation action are necessary in order to serve the public health, safety and welfare. 2 / d - 3 1LLL'11t • u s e. ...� . . I .. .. _ � • .v _ v • PASSED, APPROVED AND EFFECTIVE this day of November, 1992. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: ‘cgecouaiiak.res 3 /0ci,- City of Southlake,Texas CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM I - / G December 9 , 1992 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Michael H. Barnes, P.E. , Public Works Director SUBJECT: First American Savings Banc Addition Developer's Agreement Attached is the standard developer's agreement for First American Savings Banc Addition (FASBA) . This is a one (1) lot development and requires a developer's agreement because of the utilities that are being dedicated to the City. The dedication of the utilities are addressed in the standard agreement, Section II, Facilities, A. and D. Two other items of interest are addressed on Page 8. An electrical transformer is being relocated that was initially installed for the Crossroads Square Subdivision. The developer's engineer, Carter & Burgess, and Tri-County Electric has informed the City that the relocation will not interfere with Crossroads Square power service. Also, the developer is agreeing to pay the Park Fees of $527 . Please place this item on the Council's December 15 agenda for their consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. f MHB/lc Attachment: Developer's Agreement c:I npfi(eslmemos IFirstbnc.DA FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC ADDITION 12/09/92 DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, of the First American Savings Banc Addition (FASBA) to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to Lot 1, Block 1 contained within the First American Savings Banc Addition (Phase I) and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the addition. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City a performance bond and payment bond or letter of credit or cash escrow guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the subdivision if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this agreement between the City and Developer. The above bonds will be required if the total cost of the improvements (water, sewer, streets and drainage dedicated to the City for maintenance) exceeds $25, 000. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. C. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. 5 D. Until the performance and payment bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow required in C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the subdivision shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said subdivision by the Developer, save and except as provided above. E. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City of Southlake and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities.• 'Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire agreement shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. F. On all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. To pay to the City three (3%) percent of the construction cost for inspection fees of the water, streets, drainage facilities, and sanitary sewer. It is agreed by both the City and the Developer that the City will pay the following testing fees and the Developer will be responsible to pay for all other testing fees required by the City not listed below: a) All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard) . Trench testing (95% Standard) shall be paid by the Developer; b) All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization; c) Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; d) Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. Charges for retesting as a result of failed tests will be paid by the Developer. Fees are payable prior to construction of each phase, based on actual bid construction costs. - The Developer will be responsible to pay for all inspection fees when inspection is required on Saturday or Sunday. These fees are considered over and above the 3% inspection fee as stated above. 2 /t_e - Acceptance of the project will not be given until all inspection fees are paid. 2 . To delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this contract until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. G. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses, hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintain the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer or Builder has notice of costs. H. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc. ) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect' until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. I. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the FASBA to the City of Southlake. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, 3 /�-� - y materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. DRAINAGE: (If applicable) Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the addition. These facilities shall be: in accordance with the plans and specifications to be' prepared by Developer's engineers, approved by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. C. STREETS: (If applicable) 1. The street construction in the FASBA residential development of the City of Southlake shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217 . Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2 . The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and one year operation of street lights; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by an engineering study performed by the Director of Public Works. 3 . All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. 4 //� -L It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of FASBA .to the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc. , to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the streets. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and placed the soil within the subdivision at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. F. AMENITIES: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the FASBA may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or 5 /d.6 - specialty 'item such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The City shall be responsible only for the maintenance of those items within the public right-of-way and then only to the extent provided in other subdivisions within the City. G. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds submitted to the City, if required. 2 . At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Approved for Construction" by the City Engineer. 3 . All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4 . Developer's Agreement executed. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. 6 /':e - 7 C. Approval by the City Engineer of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall fore period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings bought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. 7 F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew tfhe agreement with such renewed agreement to be in complial-ice with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES: A. ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER RELOCATION: In the construction of the Crossroads Square Subdivision (CSS) , a pad mount transformer was installed within a utility easement on the west side of the CSS to provide power to the subdivision. The transformer was installed by Tri-County Electric Cooperative and is located in the middle of the proposed driveway that connects CSS with First American Savings Banc (FASBA) . The developer's engineer, Carter & Burgess, and Tri- County Electric has informed the City that Tri-County Electric will relocate the transformer to the north where it will not interfere with the driveway. Tri-County Electric has assured the City that the relocation of the transformer will not interfere with the power supply to CSS and is sending a letter to the City stating same. B. PARK FEES: The developer agrees to pay the Park Fee of $500 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 , Section 7 . 0. There is approximately 1. 054 acres in this phase of the development which would bring the total cost of the Park Fee to $527 . 00. C. PERIMETER STREET FEE: No perimeter street fees are required for this development. R r SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: c:\wpfiles\devag ree\firstam.dev 9 Ud ^ A Future \\'itIi A Past DEC 15 1992 Y / OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER GRAPEVINE December 14, 1992 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: I apologize for taking so long to return your letter of October 29, 1992. As you know, some of these issues require Council discussion, which took longer to schedule than I had planned. You asked that the City of Grapevine authorize the City of Southlake to add sewer service to the existing interlocal contract agreement for the remaining pad site within Southlake of the Park Place subdivision. I want to assure you that Grapevine fully intends to cooperate as much as possible on all matters related to area economic development and growth. Certain parameters, however, must be observed before granting a request of this nature that I'm sure you will understand and share. First, and most obvious, are health and safety issues. It is my understanding that the existing interlocal agreement would not have taken place had it not been for the unsanitary conditions resulting from an existing business in Southlake not being tied in to a sanitary sewer, which resulted in raw sewerage leaking onto Park Boulevard. Second, every reasonable effort must be made to locate prospective businesses within Grapevine. If those efforts fail, certainly Grapevine wants the business to stay within our general area. In this case, Cencor has an option to move the pad site to a point where it would be within the corporate city limits of Grapevine, and thereby, would justifiably be included in Grapevine's sewer service. Finally, if a business elects not to move into Grapevine, we must be cognizant of the competitive impact that business will have on existing businesses that pay taxes in Grapevine. In this case, the competing business would likely negatively impact an existing Grapevine business closely located to this proposed location. THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. Box 95104 • Grapevine, Texas 76099 • Phone Metro 81 7/481-0380 Curtis Hawk Page 2 These factors have left the Council no choice but to deny the request to add this site to the existing sewer interlocal agreement. I regret that we are unable to assist Southlake in this matter; however, I hope you can understand and respect our position. You asked about the common boundary of State Highway 114 between the exit ramp and Northwest Highway. I have asked Jerry Hodge to meet with your engineering staff to try to arrive at an acceptable resolution to this problem. This seems like an issue that can be handled administratively, but I will await a recommendation from Mr. Hodge. You also asked about Grapevine's position on the ETJ between Lonesome Dove Road and the Corps property at the lake. I can certainly understand the concerns given the proximity of this property to Southlake and the fact that public safety response has been complicated. At this time, Grapevine is not particularly interested in annexing this property. If Southlake would like to annex the property, we would be happy to try and identify and trade a parcel that poses the same logistics problems with annexation for Southlake as this trade does for Grapevine. Apparently, as a result of a 1973 judgment, Grapevine retained exclusive ETJ over the area in question, and Southlake retained exclusive ETJ over a 12-acre parcel along Highway 26 across the railroad tracks on the west side of the highway bordered by Highway 114 on the north. One suggestion is to "re-swap" those properties involved in the 1973 judgment. Concerning your questions about amendments to the Municipal Airport Act proposed by DFW, there is currently much activity. As you are aware, DFW, through the North Texas Commission and other entities, is circulating resolutions throughout Texas aimed at gathering support for the airport's position. The resolution speaks to the economic impact of the airport on the Metroplex, and makes an appeal for assistance in such a way that it appears to be helping all Texans by supporting the resolution. The exact tactic the airport intends to take during the regular legislative session is to seek amendment to the Municipal Airport Act to exclude the zoning authority of Grapevine, Euless and Irving on DFW property. No doubt, the bill will be very narrowly worded so that the focus is only on properties on DFW properties located within the corporate city limits of Grapevine, Euless and Irving. In the next week or so, you will be receiving a letter that will be sent throughout the state signed by Tom Hart, Jack Huffman and me, concerning our position on the legislative efforts being made by DFW. No matter how narrowly defined, this still is a question of whether or not one city has the legal right to remove zoning authority from another city. In this case, Dallas and Fort Worth are seeking to have zoning authority over our three cities s y Curtis Hawk Page 3 in the form of an amendment to the Municipal Airport Act, which would allow DFW to expand in spite of the existing legal zoning authority of the three host cities. We are also printing a brochure that will be going out to most Texas cities appealing for support on the issue of home rule. We are stressing the fact that Grapevine, Euless and Irving are in favor of economic development in Texas and that their intentions are not to stifle the growth or development of DFW Airport. Our plea to the legislature and other cities is simply to allow us to retain our home rule authority guaranteed in the Texas Constitution. Any assistance you and your council can provide in helping spread the word about the airport's attempt to remove our zoning authority would be greatly appreciated. I hope this letter addresses some of your concerns about current issues affecting our cities. I Will be in touch with you shortly to further discuss these matters. Sincerel , Trent Pe y City Manager TP/cb • o or- T U ! OIT I T Y OF E S S • (4111 City otirving GRAPEVINE EMEOWE December 11, 1992 DEC 1 5 1992 OFFICE OF CITY K / MANAGER Re: Legislative Proposal to Negatively Affect A City' s Right to Zone Property and Exercise Its Sovereignty Within Its Boundaries Dear Colleague: We are the City Managers of the Cities of Grapevine, Euless and Irving and are writing this letter to all City Managers across the state to advise each of you of proposed legislative action that is threatening our three cities and might also. adversely affect your ability to manage and regulate your city. The legislative effort is being pushed by the DFW Airport Board, the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth and the major airlines that use DFW Airport. Although DFW Airport is located within our cities ' boundaries and we have had an ongoing compatible relationship for 20 years, that relationship has now been shattered, the spirit of cooperation has been withdrawn by DFW Airport, and we have each been sued by DFW Airport Board and the Airlines. They contend that our ordinances are null and void as they might relate to DFW Airport. They also contend that they can purchase any property within our cities (with which we agree, so long as it is a voluntary transaction) and when it is purchased by Dallas and Fort Worth, the DFW Airport Board can use it in any way it wishes (with which we disagree) . They also contend they can condemn and assume control of our public streets, even to the extent of closing or relocating streets. Our cities, without warning or conversation, were sued by the DFW Airport Board, which was then joined in the lawsuit by American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Parcel Service. The central issue was : Could our cities continue to zone property, regulate land uses and control the streets and roadways within our cities ' • respective boundaries, even though the properties might be purchased by Dallas and Fort Worth and turned over to their appointees, the DFW Airport Board? The District Court of Dallas County ruled against DFW Airport Board and in favor of our cities . All of those parties have appealed the court' s decision but in the meantime, have announced their intention to have the Legislature change the law to suit their desires . 0 By way of background information, the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport is located almost exclusively within the boundaries of our cities . We have enforced zoning and land use powers at the Airport even before it was constructed and completed in 1974 . The Airport'-Board has, for the past 20 years, sought and obtained the full cooperation from our cities through actions such as the abandonment of streets and roadways on Airport properties, the approval of numerous zoning requests by the Airport or its tenants, and the adoption by ordinance of DFW Airport Board rules and regulations to make them enforceable at the Airport; in fact, there has never been a denial of a DFW Airpprt request by any of our cities. This spirit of cooperation has existed between the Airport Board and the cities, which cooperation enabled the DFW Airport to prosper and become the second busiest airport in the country. In 1989, the Airport Board announced a "new" Master Plan and a $3.5 billion expansion of the Airport. ( It now appears clear that no one -- Dallas, Fort Worth, nor any of the Airlines can afford such a debt and the only things realistically being sought are modifications to boarding gates and two new runways . ) The two new full service air carrier runways would have their flight paths directly over commercial, church and residential developments, all of which either previously existed or had been constructed in good faith and in reliance upon the Airport ' s Original Master Plan, which did not include these two runways. In Irving, numerous businesses and some 20,000 residents are directly and negatively impacted. In Euless, some 5, 000 residents are faced with the same devastation. In Grapevine, the entire downtown area, including the Historic District, which is on the National Register, the new convention center, the new library, churches and some 12,500 residences are negatively impacted. DFW' s answer is that they are offering "the greatest mitigation program in history. " This may be so, but there has never been such potential devastation and over one-half of those being negatively impacted are being totally ignored. In addition to the individual property owners ' damages, our city governments are faced with issues of DFW bulldozing literally hundreds of homes, multifamily units and business developments with the attendant loss of tax revenues. Our school districts are faced with population relocation with schools remaining in the high noise contours . Our recreation centers and park lands in those areas are faced with uncertainty. Streets, along with water and sewer lines taken over by DFW, would now be under a "foreign" control. As you know, when a community decides to adopt a home-rule charter pursuant to the Texas Constitution, it assumes that the city will be able to decide for itself how the city will be run, including the inalienable right to determine how land will be used within its boundaries . The people in Texas in 1912 adopted the home-rule provisions to the Constitution so that each city could decide its own destiny. The legislation would abolish not only the decision - 2 - made by the people in each home-rule city, but also the decision made by the voters in 1912 . In 1967, a constitutional amendment was approved, allowing Dallas and Tarrant counties to create the North Texas Regional Airport Authority which, if approved, would have broad and superior authority. However, the people voted "no" to the creation of such an authority. Therefore, Dallas and Fort Worth were faced with the necessity of building and operating the Airport under the provisions of the Texas Municipal Airports Act. We agree that the Texas Municipal Airports Act allows Dallas and Fort Worth tolbuild and operate an airport. We do not want to operate this Airport and have never sought such authority. But, as the District Court in Dallas stated, the "Host Cities" (Grapevine, Irving and Euless) are not preempted by state or federal law from enforcing their zoning ordinances within their boundaries and, that the Host Cities have exclusive dominion over their public streets and roadways. The court ' s ruling was based upon the simple, yet fundamental sovereign right of a home-rule city to be protected from invasion by any other city or entity, even if that entity is a rich group of airlines . Under the proposed legislation, the City of Dallas, for example, could come into any city in Texas, condemn land, build an airport, and have exclusive authority to zone, develop and regulate that airport in total disregard of the invaded cities ' zoning ordinances, master plan, residential development or local way of life. The health, safety and welfare of citizens would be decided by outside interests . Also, it is contended that land purchased would be tax-exempt. The DFW Airport has grown and prospered by complying with the cities ' zoning ordinances . There is no reason why it cannot continue to prosper, while at the same time continuing to comply with these zoning ordinances . To date, the DFW Airport has refused to even file a zoning application with the cities, but rather, without notice, had the sheriff serve all of the cities with citations, contending that all city ordinances were null and void, as they related to DFW Airport. This legislation is a concern for all cities whether they be home- rule or general law, big or small, or have an airport within their boundaries, because it would set an extremely dangerous precedent of having the Legislature decide on a local issue and how cities in Texas would be managed. And, if a disgruntled party lost a lawsuit with a city, the precedent would be for them to go to Austin and "win" their lawsuit by getting the Legislature to change the law. As City Managers, we have the responsibility to carefully and reasonably manage the development and growth of our cities in pursuit of the policies established by our City Councils . We have and can continue to do this, even with the Airport in our cities, but we can not effectively and knowledgeably manage our city when - 3 - some outside interest is allowed to take control and mandate what we must do. We anticipate that you will be contacted by the Airport, the Airlines and others, asking you to support this proposed legislation which could rob your city of its constitutional right to self-government. We strongly urge you to reject their advances because the threat to your city' s sovereignty greatly outweighs their vague promises of economic development for the Dallas/Fort Worth area. This legislation, if adopted, will begin a dangerous era when special interest groups will ask for special treatment from the Legislature by allowing them to invade your city and ignore your hard fought efforts to provide the very best way of life for your residents. This matter is not limited solely to an airport but involves all cities in the State of Texas. Please help us to stop this effort in its tracks . Thank you for giving these issues your consideration. If you would like to discuss this matter in greater detail or need further information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CITY OF IRVING J k Huf/man, City Manager 14) 721-26 • CITY OF EULESS 'gmP4Arot°Waif-- Tom Hart, City Manager (817) 685-1422 CITY OF GRAPE E Tren Pet , anager (817 ) 481-038 - 4 - CITY GARBAGE SERVICE, INC. 3355 Raider Drive Hurst, Texas 76053 (817) 283-3092 1-800-633-7871 To Our Valuable Customers Our Company has entered into an agreement with Sanifill, Inc. , a Houston, Texas based corporation,'- whose primary business is owning and operating landfills in Texas and other parts of the United States. The Sanifill landfill that is closest to our operation is the V.W. Crow and Sons landfill in the City of Lakeside off Jacksboro Highway (S.H. 199) . This ' agreement will be very beneficial to our Cities. Number one, it will give assurance to the Cities that City Garbage, Inc. has locked in, long term commitments for disposal of its customers and citizens waste. Two, our Company will not be totally dependent upon 'use of our competitors' landfills with no voice in any rate increases. We intend in the future as in the past to provide you with the best service possible. Sincerely, u i . cC ity re ent City Garbage Sery , I c A NEW CASES -- DECEMBER 14, 1992 SUBMITTAL (P & Z--January 7, 1993 / C.C. --January 19, 1993) ZA 92-67 CrossRoads Square, Lot 4, Revised S-P-2 Concept Plan Texaco convenience store/gas station/car wash Contact: John Taylor ZA 92-68 CrossRoads Square., Lot 4, Dev. Site Plan (S-P-2 zoning) and Building Permit ZA 92-69 CrossRoads Square, Lot 4, S .U.P. alcoholic beverage sales (beer only) ZA 92-70 S.U.P. -Equestrian Uses in the 4200-block of N. White Chapel Blvd. , North of Bob Jones Road. Contact: Owner: Mildred Moore; Applicant: Dayle Binder Showtime Farms, Inc. ) Charlie Little 522-8836 ZA 92-71 Plat Showing, 9 . 615 acres, Lot 1, A. Robinson No. 1131 Addition, Mildred Moore, owner; Dayle Binder, d\b\a Showtime Farms, Inc. , applicant ZA 92-72 Plat Showing, 0 .83 acres, Lot 5, J.G. Allen No. 18 Addition, Justin' s Grocery (Pearson Lane & F.M. 1709) ZA 92-73 Revised Final Plat, Southlake Hills, Phase 2 . Contact: John Levitt ZA 92-74 DalDen' s S-P-1 zoning and site plan. Contact: Barry Hudson ZA 92-75 DalDen' s Plat Showing, Lot 1, R. Price No. 992-D Addition ZA 92-76 Jim Martin' s Plat Showing, Lot 4, J.G. Allen No. 18 Addition (NW corner Randol Mill & F.M. 1709) Contact: Eddie Cheatham ZA 92-77 City Hall, S.U.P. -Portable Building (revised concept plan) Contact: Eddie Cheatham ANTICIPATED NEW CASES -- DECEMBER 28, 1992 SUBMITTAL * Plat Revision, Lot 25, Block 1, Woodland Heights, 2 lots: approx. 2 acres (northern 2/3 ' s) to remain "C-1"; 1-acre (southern 1/3) to rezone to "SF-1A" Owner: Richard Eakins . Contact: Coy Landes * Rezoning, 1 acre (southern 1/3) Lot 25, Block 1, Woodland Heights from "0-1" to "SF-1A" (Lot will be inside the 65 Ldn noise contour. .avigation easement required, additional acoustical design and testing required (if Council approves the zoning) _ Rezoning, 30 acres to SF-1A, Bob Jones Road. Contact: fr Tim Fleet t * Preliminary Plat, 30 acres, Bob Jones Road. Contact: Tim Fleet 4' * Wilkinson Plat Revision -- Latrobe Addition (3 lots to 2) ANTICIPATED CASES -- AFTER FIRST OF THE YEAR * Unity Church, E. Dove, Concept Plan. Contact: Wayne Lambdin * Unity Church, E. Dove, Plat Showing. Contact: John Levitt * Revised Prel . Plat, Stone Lakes, Ph. 2 . Contact: John Levitt RESOLUTION NO . 89-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS , SUPPORTING THE CITIES OF GRAPEVINE , EULESS , IRVING, AND COPPELL IN THEIR EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE AND SEEK A FAIR AND JUST RESOLUTION OF THEIR DIFFERENCES WITH DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. WHEREAS , the City of Southlake enjoys a compatible environment with Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , and anticipates continued compatibility with the airport throughout the future , such compatibility being achieved bv_ coordinated planning by the city and by the airport ; and WHEREAS , the City of Southlake believes that in order to maintain quality of life in all cities neighboring the airport , the airport and the cities must continue to plan for the compatibility of the airport with the cities , and that the great preponderance of the planning responsibility .pies with the airport in maintaining a consistent and predictable operational plan for utilizing the airport; and WHEREAS , the airport is presently considering significant changes to its operational plan , and such changes will have significant impacts upon the quality of life in the cities of Grapevine , Euless , Irving, and Coppell ; and , WHEREAS , the cities were not able to anticipate these new impacts , and thus to plan accordingly, and, if the operational changes at the airport were to be implemented without proper and fair consideration for the property and persons affected, the result could be great damage to the property and distress to the persons affected by the introduction of these new impacts ; now THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS , THAT: 1 . The continued compatibility between Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and the cities surrounding the airport is essential to the continued tranquility and economic prosperity of both the airport and its neighboring cities; and 2 . The City of Southlake supports the cities of Grapevine , Euless , Irving, and Coppell in seeking to preserve their quality of life and maintain compatibility with Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport for now and throughout future years ; and 3 . The City of Southlake encourages and most strongly recommends that Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport give full and fair consideration to the concerns expressed by the cities of Grapevine, Euless , Irving , and Coppell relating to the proposed expansion by the airport; and 4 . The City of Southlake encourages resolution of the differences between Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and the cities of Grapevine , Euless , Irving , and Coppell in a manner which will guarantee the continued compatibility of the airport with all of its neighboring cities; and 5 . The City of Southiake supports the full and fair compensation by Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport to property owners for any loss of use , loss of enjoyment , or any nuisance which may be unavoidable as a result of the implementation of any new and different operational utilization of the airport; and 6 . The City of Southiake believes that a fair and just resolution can be achieved which will not be an impediment to the future of the airport and which will ensure the quality of life and economic prosperity of all the cities in the vicinity of the airport . PASSED AND APPROVED this the ;70 day of CL , <-! '/2L-it-C- , i CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS • 4,1400IPP B y• �■r% - = ary Fires , ayor ATTEST: • • Sandra L. LeGrand • City Secretary; `' APPROVED AS TO FORM: °�,•.,- <�� • I w� - City Attorney City of Southiake , Texas Resolution No. 89-66 -2- r . RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the State Legislature enacted the Texas Municipal Airports Act in 1947, which has been amended from time to time thereafter; WHEREAS, on September 27, 1965, the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth established the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport Board under the Texas Municipal Airports Act to plan, establish, operate, and improve Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; • WHEREAS, the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth in a 1968 Agreement authorized the Airport Board to proceed with the development of the Airport to be jointly owned by the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth and operated by the Airport Board; WHEREAS, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport was opened for airline service in January, 1974, located between the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth, primarily within four cities and two counties; WHEREAS, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport has grown to be the second busiest airport in the world today and is projected to be the world's busiest by the year 2000; WHEREAS, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport must expand to meet the growing air traffic needs of the North Texas region, the State of Texas, and the entire national air transportation system; WHEREAS, after twenty years of growth and development at DFW International Airport, the Airport Board's authority to control its own land use and development as permitted under the Texas Municipal Airports Act is being challenged; WHEREAS, the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board must have the authority to operate, develop, and expand the Airport to ensure the safety of the traveling public, to maintain its competitiveness in the market, to meet the projected needs of the traveling air public, to protect 31,000 jobs and a $30 billion stimulus to the Texas economy over a twenty year period, to increase the capacity of the national air transportation system by 15%, to reduce delay costs which impact the airlines and the traveling public, and to prevent developmental gridlock by being subject to the control of numerous independent non- proprietor cities; WHEREAS, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board desires through a legislative initiative to reaffirm its authority, provided to the Airport Board under the Texas Municipal. Airports Act, to control operations, development, and land use at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; Now, Therefore, BE IT RESOLyED, BY THE • SECTION 1. supports the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board's legislative initiative to reaffirm its authority under the Texas Municipal Airports Act to operate, develop, zone, and regulate land use at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. SECTION 2. That such legislation reaffirm Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board's power, in addition to all other powers contained in the Act, to plan, acquire, establish, and develop, construct, enlarge, improve, maintain, equip, operate, regulate, zone, protect and police Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and its associated air navigation facilities and airport hazard areas. SECTION 3. That such legislation reaffirm the right already expressly given to the Airport Board to acquire property, if so authorized by the City Councils of Dallas and Fort Worth, through eminent domain proceedings including those public roads and streets reasonably necessary for the operation and development of the Airport. SECTION 4. The importance of this legislative initiative to the North Texas region, the entire State of Texas, and the national air transportation system, as a whole, warrants the passage of this Resolution. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Signed Representing Dated