Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1993-06-15 CC PACKET
6 , City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM June 10 , 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting June 15, 1993 1 . Administrative Calendars and departmental reports are in your packet . Please let me or the Directors know if you have any questions . 2 . Agenda item No. 7A. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No. 583 . Sammons Cable Company Franchise Agreement . Mr. Soulsby indicated to me last week that he believed they could live with the changes as proposed by our attorneys, but he wasn' t sure about his attorney insofar as the future regulations (Section 17) . They are concerned about future local rate regulations . Concerning rate regulations, see Agenda Item No. 9B below. 3 . Agenda Item No. 7B . Second reading. Ordinance No. 585, Tree Preservation Ordinance. Concerning this ordinance, please be aware of the staff time commitments required to enforce this ordinance . According to Greg Last, some cities go as far as having a full time Urban Forester on staff to enforce such an ordinance . Currently Greg is the only staff person knowledgeable about trees and the ordinance in particular. He will not have time to visit all construction sites, review tree removal permits, and enforce the ordinance . It is our intention to train the building inspection staff to look for violations and include enforcement of this ordinance into their daily routine. He will provide this training and will help them resolve disputes as they arise . He also intends to put together a slide presentation and briefing to be presented to the builders at one of their upcoming meetings with the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest June 10, 1993 Page 2 building official . City Council should be aware that it will take several months to establish adequate enforcement of this ordinance; there is some likelihood that you will hear from the tree preservation advocates about inadequate enforcement . 4 . Agenda Item No. 7C. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No. 480-L, was approved (5-0) as submitted on 1st Reading. The ordinance will provide variance procedures to properties within PUD, S- P-1, and S-P-2 Districts . There have been no changes since 1st reading. 5 . Agenda Item No. 7D. (ZA 93-19) , Ordinance No. 480-86 . 2nd Reading. Zone change request from AG to SF-1A. There have been no changes since first reading. 6 . Agenda Item No. 8A. (ZA 93-23) , Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park. Note the P&Z recommendation for the elimination of the common driveway bufferyard, but requirement f all other bufferyards . Should City Council concur with the P&Z recommendation, it should be part of the approval motion. 7. Agenda Item No. 8B. (ZA 93-24) , Plat Revision, Greenlee Business Park. Note the comments under P&Z action regarding Common Access Easement . 8 . Agenda Item No. 8C. (ZA 93-26) , Ordinance No. 480-87, and Agenda Item No. 8D (ZA 93-25) pertain to the Rezoning request, Concept Plan, and Preliminary Plat by JBM Development for The Dominion. This development is bound on all sides except the north by Timarron. The main issues appear to be drainage, compatibility with the surrounding area, and the street stub out . 9 . Agenda Item No. 9B. Resolution authorizing City Manager to submit application to FCC for certification of City to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest June 10, 1993 Page 3 regulate cable rates . The purpose of this item is to allow the City the option of regulating cable rates . There is a very short window, as noted in the memo from Analeslie Muncy in your packet and in the NLC newsletter excerpt attached hereto. There will still be other steps to go through; however, it is important that City Council pass the resolution in some form if you want to retain the option during the initial rate regulation period. 10 . Agenda Item No. l0B . Change Order No. 1 on Jellico Street Reconstruction Project . This item was discussed at the last City Council meeting. Please let me or Bob Whitehead know if you have any questions prior to Council meeting. 11 . Agenda Item No. 10C. Reconstruction of South Peytonville Road and drainage improvements . At City Council' s direction the staff requested that Tarrant County include South Peytonville in the Tarrant County participation road projects for the City of Southlake. We have been notified by telephone that Tarrant County will not reconstruct this particular roadway because of the lack of drainage and the inadequate roadway width. Tuesday morning June 8 , Mayor Fickes and I met with Commissioner Bob Hampton on site. He made it very clear that the County will be happy to participate with us on other projects but not this one for the reasons set forth above . Staff will review different options with City Council during the Council meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions prior to the meeting. 12 . Agenda Item No. 11A. Proposed Amendment to TU Electric Franchise Agreement . This item was discussed with City Council previously. Following dissemination to City Council May 18, the attorney reviewed the proposed agreement as submitted by TU. There are several key points we feel should t Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest June 10 , 1993 Page 4 be brought to your attention prior to asking you to consider the proposal . Note the memo from Analeslie Muncy. She will outline the variables Tuesday night . 13 . Agenda Item No. 11B. Staff Recommendation for Additional Public Works Engineer. One of our most difficult tasks is arranging our time to the point we can accomplish your (and our) objectives for quality growth and development and still be responsive to service demands . We are currently managing somehow to stay fairly close, but our quality suffers as the quantity of our workload increases . The indicators are apparent : highest growth rate in Tarrant County since 1990 (see attached estimate from NCTCOG) ; highest growth rate in assessed valuation over the previous year in Tarrant County; the number in building permits issued this year-to-date over last year-to-date (FY92 = 172/FY93 = 281; CY92 = 120/CY93 = 178) . The demands are outstripping our ability to respond as effectively as we should. We will be addressing need for additional professional staff in the budget . However, we feel we should address the project engineer at this time. The memo from Bob Whitehead outlines the need. We will discuss in greater detail Tuesday night . 14 . Reminder: City Council Retreat is next Thursday and Friday, June 17 and 18 . Dinner will be served at 5 :30 p.m. on Thursday, and the program will begin at 6 : 00 p.m. On Friday, breakfast will be served at 8 : 00 a.m. , and the program should conclude around 3 :30-4 : 00 p.m. We will discuss agenda items i h you Tuesday night . CEH HARRON CAB LEVISION OF TE =• E g E D WN 1111 May 27, 1993 JUN I 1993 I 1 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER 1 Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk: You have no doubt been reading a great deal about the 1992 Cable Act and about some of the changes the Federal Communications Commission ("F.C.C.") had ordered. operators to make. First let me emphasize that Harron Cable will do everything possible to fully comply with each and every provision of the new cable law and each item in the new F.C.C. regulations. As we go about the task of interpreting the regulations we will keep you and our customers as up to date and informed as we possibly can. The regulations pertaining to "Must Carry" status for broadcasters require us, by June 2nd, 1993, to set aside up to 33 percent of our channel capacity for commercial broadcast stations. Additional channels must also be set aside for non-commercial broadcast stations, depending upon a system's channel capacity. In the case of the Southlake system, that amounts to 17 channels. Since we already carry 8 of these stations, that leaves 9 that we would have to add to our channel lineup. Harron will add broadcast stations KUVN-23 Univision, KFWD- 52 Telemundo, KLDT-55 (assuming adequate signal level) and KDTX-58 Trinity Broadcasting. We anticipate adding an additional local broadcast signal due to launch in June 1993. We have no blank channels available. Consequently we will have to drop 4 channels in order to make room for these broadcast stations. We will be dropping Univision, Galavision, Nostalgia, and The Travel Channel from our current lineup. Harron is currently evaluating the impact of "must carry" requirements (broadcast channels not presently on the lineup that,we may be required to add) on,our present lineup. Should additional "must carry" broadcast channels.need to be, added, some cable channels may have to be deleted because of lack of space. • • Post Office Box 2628 • Waxahachie,Texas 75165 • (214) 923-0887 May 27, 1993 Mr. Hawk Page two By June 17th, 1993 local commercial broadcasters are required to choose either "must carry" or "retransmission consent" privileges. If they choose "must carry" status our system will continue to carry the broadcast station on our lineup. If the station chooses "retransmission consent", the broadcaster can withhold its consent to cable carriage or can negotiate for payment, or other compensation, from us for its carriage. Dependent on the outcome of such negotiations, additional changes to our channel lineups may have to be made. Harron recognizes that some of the actions we are being required to make will alter our service and may upset customer viewing habits. Although the 1992 Cable Act has struck the cable industry a significant blow, we are working hard to comply with the new law, explain the new rules, serve our customers, serve our communities, and • run a successful business. I have enclosed a copy of the bill-stuffer we are sending our customers this month which gives them an update on some of the changes we are anticipating. As we work to interpret the new regulations, and implement the changes pertaining to rate regulation and other issues, we will continue to keep you fully informed. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any specific information regarding the 1992 Cable Act. Sincerely, HARRON CABLEVISION OF TEXAS, INC. Kevin G. Lyng s Regional Manager Enclosure 302-12'P329 593 April. 1993 15211 AN Yr IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO OUR CUSTOMERS... CABLE REREGLT.ATION UPDATE I On April I . the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) dramatically changed the way the cable television business will operate in the future. "ou max have heard about some of the changes the FCC has ordered us to make. including those that may affect cable TV prices. • First let me emphasize that Harron Cable will do everything possible to • fully comply with each and every provision of the new cable law and each item in the new FCC regulations. At the same time. we intend to keep you completely informed at each step along the way. Some of the new rules are complicated or contradictory. Some will require us to make difficult choices. or take actions that will alter our service or upset customer viewing habits. • For example, one of the new rules requires us to allocate up to one third of our.channel capacity for local commercial -must carry" broadcast ( , signals and we may have to add local broadcast stations we don't currently offer. In those communities where we have room on the cable lineup, this won't be a problem. We will simply add them. In some cases, however. this may result in some systems having to drop channels in order to comply with the Federal Law. Please refer to the reverse side of this hill-stuffer to see whether your Harron location will be affected by this ruling. The FCC rules will also change the way we bill you for various items such as remote -ontrols, converter boxes. and additional TV �}� et connections. The FCC has recently issued a +� _.50 page rate order which outlines the \ formulas under which rates will be determined. lam We are currently studying this complicated document to determine how the benchmarks — 3 3 • _n — • relate to the fees we currently charge you. As -111T..�_ „„„ soon as we know, we'll let you know what • price and billing changes are in store. The FCC benchmarks have set standard guidelines for how much a - cable company can charge for its "basic" and expanded tier services - if offered. In communities where rates are above those benchmarks, cable operators will he allowed to submit justification for that price. Local communities or the FCC will then determine whether or not the rates for these services should be adjusted, In the coming months there will be many federally-mandated changes. As we work to implement them. we'll keep you informed - especially concerning changes that may affect your bill or the current services you receive. We can also assure you that Harron's commitment to you will not change. We will continue to provide you with the best cable TV service and programming possible. For less than the cost of a cup of coffee a day. cable television continues to be the best entertainment value around. Please watch for further messages from us as we strive to let you know how the FCC rules will affect you and your cable service. • -i cerely, Kevin G. L. ngaas Regional Manager oontinueo on reverse sidei Commonly asked questions... , When will my cable bill be reduced? [he new rules don't include any across-the-board or automatic reductions or roll-backs in cable rates. Until we have had an opportunity to evaluate the benchmarks established by the EC.C., it is impossible to determine how rates will be affected. We'll keep you informed on this. • • Will I get a refund? It's too early to tell. During the next few months we will know exactly how the new rules affect our system and the rates we have been charging. Once complete we'll share the details with you. How much will rates be lowered?' There is no automatic rollback of cable rates. In fact, those systems - whose rates are already at or below the reasonable level determined by the FCC's formula will not have to reduce their rates. In some cases. the FCC may require cable systems to reduce any rate increases that have been applied since September 30. 1992. In other situations, if a system"s rates exceed FCC benchmarks for rates, a company may have to roll back its rates up to 10%. Which additional broadcast stations are currently being added? Harron will add broadcast channels: KUVN-23, Univision KFWD-52. Telemundo KLDT-55 (assuming adequate signal level) KDTX-58. Trinity Broadcasting We also anticipate adding an additional local broadcast signal due to • launch in June .1993. Are any cable channels being dropped? • Univision Galavision Nostalgia Travel Channel Harron is currently evaluating the impact of "must carry" requirements (broadcast channels not presently on the lineup that we may be required to add) on our present lineup. Should additional "must carry" broadcast channels need to be added, some cable channels may have to be deleted because of lack of space. Other provisions of the 1992 Cable Act, including "retransmission consent" (in which broadcasters may require fees for carriage of their channels). may also lead to channel lineup alterations, substitutions or deletions. We will keep you informed of any such changes, as well. TX F TiA 80-92 P329 North Central Texas Council of Governments Compound Revised Revised Annual Final Final Final Estimated Estimated Estimated Growth COUNTIES1 Census Census Census Population Population Population Rate Cities over 1,000 411170 411180 411190 111191 1/1192 111193 1990-1993 Tarrant County 71E 57 861,837 1,170.103 1,177.750 1,188,600 1,201,500 0.97% Arlington 222 160,113 261.721 264,800 267,600 271,750 1.38% Azle 4'7,3 5,822 8.868 8,900 8,950 9,000 0.54% Bedford 42 20.821 43.762 43.950 44,150 44,500 0.61% Benbrook 5 ":3 13,579 19.564 19.600 19,700 19,800 0.44% Blue Mound 253 2,169 2.133 2.200 2.300 2,350 3.59% Colleyville 33=2 6,700 12.724 12,700 13.600 14,400 4.60% Crowley 2 62 5,852 6.974 7,000 7,000 7,000 0.14% Dalworthington Gardens - 1.100 1.758 1,800 1,900 1,950 3.84% Edgecliff Village ' "=3 2,695 2.715 2,700 2,700 2,700 -0.20% Euless 1 c:'0 24,002 38,149 38,550 38,750 38,850 0.66% Everman -J 5,387 5,672 5,650 5,650 5,650 -0.14% Forest Hill 5 236 11,684 11,482 11,500 11.500 11,450 -0.10% Fort Worth 393 455 385,164 447,619 448,400 450,250 452,250 0.37% Grapevine 77,19 11,801 29.202 29,700 30,500 31,400 2.67% Haltom City 25"27 29,014 32.856 32,800 32,800 32,850 -0.01% Hurst 272'5 31,420 33,574 33,650 33,750 34,050 0.51% Keller • =-s 4,156 13.683 14,150 14,950 15,950 5.73% Kennedale 3 _ 2,594 4,096 4,100 4,150 4,200 0.92% Lake Worth 4=5d 4,394 4.591 4,600 4,600 4,600 0.07% Mansfield 3 558 8,102 15,607 15,950 16,300 16,350 1.71% North Richland Hills 1,a 5•- 30,592 45.895 46.900 47,650 48,300 1.87% Pantego - '9 2,431 2.371 2,350 2,350 2,350 . -0.32% Pelican Bay NI NI 1,271 1,250 1,200 1,200 -2.07% Richland Hills 5=c5 7,977 7.978 8,000 8,150 8,150 0.78% River Oaks E. -23 6,890 6.580 6,550 6,550 6,550 -0.17% Saginaw' 2 3.52 5,736 8.551 8,600 8,600 8,600 0.21% Sansom Park 4"1 3,921 3.928 3,900 3,900 3,900 -0.26% Southlake 2.31 2,808 7,065 7,400 8,000 8,700 7.86% Watauga 3—9 10,284 20.009 20,250 20,400 20,750 1.33% Westworth Village 4 -3 3,651 2,350 2,350 2,350 2,300 -0.78% White Settlement 1:-_g 13,508 15,472 15,400 15,400 15,350 -0.29% Remainder of Tarrant County 2=15,5 30,116 34.044 34,250 34,600 34,950 0.96% Split Cities :0 6,397 17.839 17,850 18,350 19,350 Wise County 2:4-3 27.452 34.679 34,750 34,850 34,850 0.18% Boyd =:5 889 1.041 1,050 1,050 1,050 0.31% Bridgeport 3_•- 3,737 3.581 3.550 3,550 3,550 -0.32% Decatur =2=J 4,104 4.252 4,300 4,300 4,300 0.41% Remainder of Wise County 1 ='5 16,955 25.805 25,850 25.950 25,950 0.20% Dallas Fort Worth CMSA3 2.43: '52 2,933,293 3,885,415 3,916,100 3,957,900 4,012,450 1.18% (all counties in both PMSA's) • Dallas PMSA3 1.634 i=d 1,959,198 2,553.362 2.575,950 2,606,800 2,647,400 1.32% (Collin, Dallas, Denton.Ellis, Kaufman and Rockwall Counties) Fort Worth—Arlington PMSA3 795 244 974,095 1,332.053 1,340.150 1,351,100 1,365,050 0.89% (Johnson,Parker and Tarrant Counties) NCTCOG Region(16 counties) 2.505—2 3,119,806 4,111.750 4,142,850 4,185,700 4,240,500 1.13% The Census Bureau has officially changed the 1=::copulation figure for the cities of Allen and Duncanville. NI—not incorporated 1 The county total includes any portion of cities c.: red within the county boundary—while city totals reflect the total population within incorporated limits Split Cities are cities overlapping county bourn Fs. 1993 county population totals are adjusted thusly: Number of persons subtracted from the C-ry of... Added to the County of... Dallas-31,062:Richardson-11.654; Sacrrsa-200; Royse City-167;Garland-15 Collin Carrollton-40,645:Combine-434;Grapzrre-3: Lewisville-607;Ovilla-285 Dallas Coppell-3; Dallas-14,656; Frisco-511.Pafo-94;Southlake-249 Denton Cedar Hill-53;Glenn Heights-793:Gra-i: =wne-3; Mansfield-142 Ellis Mansfield-340 Johnson Dallas-7 Kaufman Azle-1,245;Mineral Wells-28 Parker Dallas-39;Rowlett-4.017;Wylie-69 Rockwall Burleson-2,374:Grand Prairie-18,953 Tarrant 2 Town of Mabank population estimates include:.-r! mat portion of Mabank that is in Kaufman County. 3 Metropolitan Statistical Area(MSA)definitions-we not been updated to the new MSA definitions which became effective December 31. 1992. The preparation of this document was financed r:al through grants from and disseminated under the sponsorship of the Urban Mass Transportation Administration and the Federal Highway Administration(U.S. De ra -rent of Transportation). The United Stales Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. For technical questions,contact Donna Coggesnall, Regional Data Center,NCTCOG.To order copies of this and other COG publications,contact Alice Tate, Regional Information Center,NCTCOG,616 Six rags Drive,Suite 200,P.O. Box 5888,Arlington,Texas 76005-5888,(817)640-3300. MAY 31, 1993 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR MAY 1993 NUMBER OF THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR PERMITS ISSUED MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE FISCAL FISCAL MAY93 APR93 MAY 1992 1-5 1993 1-5 1992 10/92-05/93 10/91-05/92 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 44 39 25 178 120 281 172 Alteration/Addn. 4 5 3 18 6 29 9 Accessory Bldg 0 4 2 12 12 13 21 Commercial-New 2 2 0 9 5 19 5 Commercial-Alt/Addn. 0 1 1 2 7 4 17 Foundation Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Swimming Pool 24 16 13 86 42 109 56 -: SUB-CONTRACTORS: A' Electrical 82 80 50 391 238 638 342 Plumbing 74 63 39 296 194 458 301 Heat/Air 47 45 29 195 143 314. 213 Culvert 1 1 3 5 7 8 9 Demolition 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 CERT. OF OCCUPANCY: Residential 52 80 20 250 140 404 231 COMMERCIAL 3 06 2 47 31 62 41 OTHER: Misc.Building 27 27 13 154 76 221 110 SIGNS 1 3 5 23 44 36 62 SCHOOLS 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 TENNIS COURTS 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 FENCE 1 0 0 4 4 4 9 CHURCH 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 SATELLITE DISH/ANTENNA 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 TOTALS 363 372 206 1674 1070 2605 1599 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR MAY 1993 MAY 31, 1993 FEES COLLECTED FOR THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR PERMITS ISSUED MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE FISCAL FISCAL MAY93 APR93 MAY 1992 1-5 1993 1-5 1992 10/92-05/93 10/91/05/92 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 54,425.80 48,579.00 30,629.00 220,985.80 150,164.00 344,525.80 181,739.63 Alteration/Addn: 857.00 1,074.00 617.00 4,198.00 994.00 7,160.00 1,822.00 . Accessory Bldg. 0.00 328.00 314.00 1,509.00 2,248.00 3,453.00 3, 139.00 Commercial-New 3,410.00 2,446.00 .00 8,780.00 9,503.00 12,221.00 9,503.00 Commercial-Alt/Addn. .00 163.00 133.00 415.00 2,234.00 1,812.00 5,530.00 Foundation Only .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Swimming Pool 5,999.00 3,675.00 2,535.00 20,318.00 9,963.00 26,469.00 12,914.40 1 P SUB-CONTRACTORS: et Electrical 9,325.41 8,616.78 5,192.02 38,993.33 24,752.25 61,421.13 35, 123.67 Plumbing 8,199.75 7,125.75 4,511.26 32,181.75 21,591.01 50,698.00 30,924.76 Heat/Air 4,282.50 4,137.50 2,444.00 17,581.00 11,482.00 27,399.00 16,997.25 Culvert .00 65.00 195.00 260.00 455.00 455.00 585.00 Demolition .00 .00 .00 .00 15.00 15.00 15.00 CERT. OF OCCUPANCY: Residential .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Commercial 30.00 120.00 60.00 720.00 750.00 1,140.00 1,050.00 OTHER: Misc.Building 687.00 654.00 312.00 3,798.00 1,890.00 5,430.00 2,790.00 SIGNS 192.00 175.00 230.00 1,519.00 2,561.00 2,275.00 3,500.00 SCHOOLS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TENNIS COURT .00 .00 .00 151.00 .00 151.00 .00 FENCE 30.00 .00 87.00 194.00 1,074.00 194.00 2,437.20 CHURCH .00 .00 .00 15.00 .00 15.00 .00 SATELLITE DISH/ANTENNA 30.00 .00 .00 .10.0() .00 A0.00 .00 TOTALS 87,468.46 77, 159.03 47,259.28 351,648.88 239,676.26 544,863.93 308,070.91 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR MAY 1993 MAY 31, 1993 THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR BUILDING VALUATION MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE TOTAL FISCAL TOTAL FISCAL FOR PERMITS ISSUED MAY93 APR93 MAY 92 1-5 1993 01-05 1992 10/92-05/93 10/91-05/92 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 9,297,200.00 8,335,400.00 5,226,000.00 37,821.941.00 24,411,000.00 58,677,032.00 34,903,302.00 Alteration/Addn. 66,800.00 102,500.00 59,500.00 527,000.00 85,300.00 789,500.00 161,300.00 Accessory Bldg. .00 19,900.00 23,000.00 110,900.00 183,300.00 448,300.00 246,700.00 Commercial-New 424,800.00 258,000.00 .00 1,026,200.00 1,275,200.00 1,306,300.00 1,275,200.00 Commercial-A1t/Addn. .00 8,000.00 9,300.00 33,000.00 293,800.00 48,000.00 558,600.00 pi Foundation Only .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ..,1 Swimming Pool 487,700.00 293,000.00 195,500.00 1,631,300.00 743,800.00 2,130,600.00 973,300.00 V4 SCHOOLS .00 .00 .00 31,000.00 .00 _ 31,000.00 .00 TENNIS COURTS .00 .00 .00 11,000.00 .00 11,000.00 .00 FENCE 1,000.00 .00 5,000.00 9,400.00 86,600.00 9,400.00 228,500.00 CHURCH .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 500.00 .00 SATELLITE DISH/ANTENNA 1,000.00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .00 1,000.00 .00 TOTALS 10,278,500.00 9,016,800.00 5,518,300.00 41,203,241.00 27,079,000.00 63,452,632.00 38,346,902.00 TOTAL INSPECTIONS: 1269 1605 636 7096 3377 11,437 4707 BUILDING INSPECTIONS• CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION OCTORER 156 $1 1,70(1.DU Building J',U 4',(> 197 NOVEMBER '.'1 4,41'..00 Electrical 356 417 162 DECEMBER 60 4,500.00 Plumbing 400 450 153 JANUARY 39 2,925.00 Mechanical 151 264 102 FEBRUARY 20 1,500.00 MARCH 32 2,400.00 TOTAL BLDG. INSP. 1251 1581 615 APRIL 32 2,400.00 MAY 36 2,700.00 CODE ENFORCEMENT: Investigations 18 24 21 TOTAL TO DATE 434 $32,550.00 City of South lake,Texas COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEE REVENUE REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING 31 May 1993 ZONING $ 300 . 00 NO. OF CASES (3) PLATTING 71, 480 . 00 NO. OF CASES (8) SITE PLAN/CONCEPT PLANS 125 . 00 NO. OF CASES (1) SPECIFIC USE PERMITS . 00 NO. OF CASES (0) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 50 . 00 NO. OF CASES (1) MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 140 . 00 NO. OF RECEIPTS (10) TOTAL REVENUE $72 , 095 . 00 TOTAL NO. OF RECEIPTS (23) C:\WPFILES\GLORIA\REVENUE.RPT 4 - b1 COMPLAINTS REPORT MAY 1993 DEPARTMENT THIS LAST # CLOSED # CLOSED YTD* YTD* MONTH MONTH THIS MO. LAST MO. RCVD. CLOSED MAY93 APR93 MAY93 APR93 1993 1993 Streets & 25 32 12 27 107 102 Drainage Code 18 24 16 20 129 100 Enforcement Water & 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wastewater * YTD totals for 1993 Calendar Year 11 I ADMINISTRATIVE CALENDAR FINANCE DEPARTMENT MONTH: JUNE 1993 START/END COMPLETE REMARKS 1. FY1993-94 Budget 4/93-9/93 begin 10% Department heads submit requests week of 6/14. Review with.CM 6/21-25 2. June Retreat 6/17-6/18 Review purchasing and investment policies 3. Close May general ledger 6/9-6/11 complete 1-00% distribute to departments --- — 4. UPS system for computer 6/93 contacting 20% working through HGAC for vendors purchase 5. Utility delinquent notices 6/93- researching 5% alternative forms for utility delinquent notices 6. Southlake information sheet for new . 5/93-7/93 draft review 50% incorporating changes, proceed once utility customers completed 7. Computer use policy 5/93- initial meeting 10% committee exploring computer hardware and software policy for City 8. Utility Impact fee update 3/93-8/93 review by 75% submit to Council 7/6 Advisory Com 9. Southlake special newsletter 40% information partially assembled SPECIAL PROJECTS 10. 11. 12. 13. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE General Fund and Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended May 31, 1993 with Comparative Actual amounts for the period ended May 31, 1992 To Date Percent To Date Actual Percent 1992-93 Actual Collected/ Actual Total Collected/ REVENUES Budget 5/31/93 Expended 5/31/92 9/30/92 Expended Ad Valorem Taxes $2,909,533 $2,884,040 99.1% $2,603,504 $2,739,250 95.0% Sales Tax 579,000 346,835 59.9% 283,081 510,036 55.5% Franchise Fees 304,450 281 642 92.5% 223,716 279,619 80.0% Fines 270,600 15,554 42.7% 141,849 207,499 68.4% Charges for Services 55,750 30 554 54.8% 25,572 47,540 53.8% Permits/Fees 622,150 qii::10VP 126.7% 438,430 791,983 55.4% Miscellaneous 17,340 13,831 79.8% 13,221 42,194 31.3% Transfer In-Other Funds 267,295 0 0.0% 29,451 191,224 15.4% Interest Income 65,000 52,522 80.8% 45,005 75,139 59.9% Total Revenues $5,091,118 $4,513,527 88.7% $3,803,829 $4,884,484 77.9% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $145,599 $89,096 61.2% $75,310 $124,457 60.5% City Manager 141,239 94,978 67.2% 87,735 129,129 67.9% Support Services 509,964 288,595 56.6% 263,303 417,493 63.1% Finance 205,487 140,187 68.2% 133,651 192,339 69.5% Municipal Court 162,858 85,926 52.8% 101,500 145,345 69.8% Fire 569,238 327,623 57.6% 296,312 531,671 55.7% Police 909,333 571,446 62.8% 498,729 825,242 60.4% Public Safety Support 378,852 233,758 61.7% 227,103 340,626 66.7% Building 161,870 103,876 64.2% 81,975 127,329 64.4% Community Development 197,888 152,325 77.0% 96,009 145,414 66.0% Streets/Drainage 883,730 467,941 53.0% 312,130 685,700 45.5% Parks 139,595 60,179 43.1% 43,918 101,924 43.1% Public Works Administration 93,739 38,304 40.9% 46,493 69,674 66.7% Debt Service-General Obligation Bonds 916,398 532,376 58.1% 479,337 758,997 63.2% Total Expenditures $5,415,790 $3,186,610 58.8% $2,743,505 $4,595,340 59.7% Excess (deficiency)of Revenue over Expenditures ($324,672)$1,326,917 $1,060,324 $289,144 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND(USES) Transfer to other fund $0 $0 $0 ($796) Excess (deficiency)of Revenues and other sources over Expenditures ($324,672)$1,326,917 $1,060,324 $288,348 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $1,276,569 $1 276,569 $988,221 $988,221 ENDING FUND BALANCE $951,897 2 603 486 $2,048,545 $1,276,569 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 1 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.67% OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT ******YEAR-TO-DATE****** ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 000 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 TAXES 110.00 AD VALOREM/CURRENT 58,824.31 1,898,249.16 101 1,877,484 20,765.16- 111.00 AD VALOREM/DELINQUENT 4,401.46 140,859.03 101 140,000 859.03- 112.00 PENALTY & INTEREST 5,304.47 25,842.76 30 85,000 59,157.24 115.00 SALES TAX 68,664.07 346,835.19 60 579,000 232,164.81 121.00 FRANCHISE-GAS 48,842.93 48,842.93 97 50,600 1,757.07 122.00 FRANCHISE-TELEPHONE 7,203.16 25,792.30 74 34,800 9,007.70 123.00 FRANCHISE-ELECTRIC 197,022.08 94 208,900 11,877.92 124.00 FRANCHISE-BANK 125.00 FRANCHISE-CABLE 734.00 9,985.35 98 10,150 164.65 100 TAXES 193,974.40 2,693,428.80 90 2,985,934 292,505.20 200 FINES 210.00 FINES & FORFEITURES 7,951.51 115,024.96 43 268,800 153,775.04 215.00 TEEN COURT REVENUES 173.00 529.00 29 1,800 1,271.00 200 FINES 8,124.51 115,553.96 43 270,600 155,046.04 300 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 301.00 AMBULANCE 8.50 2,948.00 20 15,000 12,052.00 302.00 DISPATCHING 303.00 MUTUAL AID 750 750.00 305.00 SPECIAL SERVICES PROGRAM 17,050.02 49 35,000 17,949.98 ' 320.00 PARK/RECREATION FEES 21.00 21.00- 321.00 BUILDING RENTAL FEES 30.00 145.00 145.00- ' 350.00 FIRE DEPT INCOME 5,000.00 100 5,000 370.00 RECREATION CLASS FEES 5,390.00 5,390.00 5,390.00- 300 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 5,428.50 30,554.02 55 55,750 25,195.98 400 PERMITS & FEES 410.00 PERMITS-RES NEW SINGLE FAM 54,425.80 344,521.04 106 325,000 19,521.04- 410.01 PERMITS-BLDG RES-ALT/ADDN 716.00 8,169.80 8,169.80- 410.02 PERMITS-BLDG RES-ACS BLDGS 1,706.78 1,706.78- 410.03 PERMITS-BLDG COMMRCL NEW 3,410.00 12,221.00 12,221.00- 410.04 PERMITS-BLDG COMMERCIAL 141.00 2,423.00 2,423.00- 411.00 PERMITS-PLUMBING 8,163.64 54,161.54 108 50,000 4,161.54- 412.00 PERMITS-ELECTRICAL 9,285.94 59,496.35 108 55,000 4,496.35- 413.00 PERMITS-HEAT & AIR 4,282.50 27,502.00 110 25,000 2,502.00- 414.00 PERMITS-SPRINKLER 672.00 5,037.60 126 4,000 1,037.60- 414.01 PERMITS-WATER WELL 90.00 90.00- 415.00 PERMITS-SITE PLAN 400.00 40 1,000 600.00 416.00 PERMITS-CULVERT 455.00 65 700 245.00 416.01 PERMITS-APPROACH 15.00 45.00 45.00- 417.00 PERMITS-POOL 6,010.00 26,392.00 132 20,000 6,392.00- 418.00 PERMITS-SIGN 192.00 2,297.00 57 4,000 1,703.00 419.00 PERMITS-HOUSE MOVING 419.01 PERMITS-DEMOLITION 420.00 PERMITS-SOLICITORS 10.00 10.00 10 100 90.00 421.00 PERMITS-ALCOHOLIC USE 60.00 60.00- 422.00 PERMITS & FEES-MISC. 120.00 2,415.00 13 19,150 16,735.00 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 2 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.6Th OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT ******YEAR-TO-DATE****** ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL 96BUD REVENUE BALANCE 423.00 FEES-ZONING 325.00 2,379.10 26 9,000 6,620.90 424.00 FEES-PLATTING 71,580.00 183,693.00 735 25,000 158,693.00- 425.00 FEES-BOARD OF ADJ 150.00 850.00 53 1,600 750.00 426.00 FEES-ZONING SPECIAL EXCEPT 50.00 50 100 50.00 427.00 FEES-STREET LIGHTS 2,000 2,000.00 429.00 FEES-INSPECTION 21,207.06 42 50,000 28,792.94 430.00 FEES-SPECIAL USE ZONING 100.00 20 500 400.00 431.00 FEES-BUILDING 242.00 242.00- 440.00 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION 2,775.00. 32,625.00 109 30,000 2,625.00- 400 PERMITS & FEES 162,273.88 788,549.27 127 622,150 166,399.27- 500 MISCELLANEOUS 502.00 PERIMETER RD FEE 510.00 MIS-INCOME 238.75 5,526.54 92 6,000 473.46 511.00 MIS-VITAL STATISTICS 120 120.00 512.00 MIS-INSPECTION FEES 513.00 MIS-RETURNED CHECK CHG 10.00 120.00 100 120 515.00 MIS-FEMA FUNDS 516.00 MIS-STREET LIGHTS 517.00 MIS-ZONING , 518.00 MIS-BUILDING 519.00 MIS-POLICE DEPARTMENT 151.00 1,139.00 76 1,500 361.00 520.00 MIS-SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 530.00 MIS-TOWER LEASE 800.00 6,400.00 67 9,600 3,200.00 531.00 MISC-PUBLICATIONS 15.00 645.00 645.00- 500 MISCELLANEOUS 1,214.75 13,830.54 80 17,340 3,509.46 700 OTHER REVENUES 713.00 OPERATING TRANSFER IN 159,446 159,446.00 726.00 LOAN PROCEEDS 700 OTHER REVENUES 159,446 159,446.00 900 INTEREST 910.00 INTEREST EARNED 6,159.26 44,564.90 89 50,000 5,435.10 900 INTEREST 6,159.26 44,564.90 89 50,000 5,435.10 000 * NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 377,175.30 3,686,481.49 89 4,161,220 474,738.51 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 377,175.30 3,686,481.49 89 4,161,220 474,738.51 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 1 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 DEPT 000 TOTAL ******** .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 4,551.27 37,655.57 .00 65 57,872 20,216.43 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,833.33 17,845.46 .00 63 28,150 10,304.54 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 1,393.49 10,211.64 .00 70 14,500 4,288.36 500 OTHER EXPENSES 111.60 2,492.91 .00 45 5,500 3,007.09 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 445.05 4,145.57 .00 49 8,500 4,354.43 700 MAINTENANCE .00 360.00 .00 75 480 120.00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 806.61 10,265.45 .00 43 23,747 13,481.55 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 6,119.46 .00 89 6,850 730.54 DEPT 100 TOTAL ******** 9,141.35 89,096.06 .00 61 145,599 56,502.94 CITY SEC/MAYOR/COUNCIL 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 10,889.78 80,943.59 .00 64 126,267 45,323.41 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 21.00 .00 2 1,000 979.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 70.69 1,062.82 .00 43 2,500 1,437.18 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 333.68 5,680.39 .00 270 2,100 3,580.39- 700 MAINTENANCE 44.68 319.72 .00 53 600 280.28 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 220.20 4,999.78 .00 80 6,272 1,272.22 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 1,950.87 .00 78 2,500 549.13 DEPT 103 TOTAL ******** 11,559.03 94,978.17 .00 67 141,239 46,260.83 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,673.28 9,114.58 .00 43 21,240 12,125.42 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,954.98 101,782.88 .00 52 194,000 92,217.12 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS 1,235.80 23,595.43 .00 64 36,674 13,078.57 400 SUPPLIES 5.94 471.80 .00 13 3,500 3,028.20 500 OTHER EXPENSES 5,542.02 50,461.87 .00 51 98,950 48,488.13 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 23,252.75 72,567.25 .00 70 103,450 30,882.75 700 MAINTENANCE 1,874.79 27,271.70 .00 71 38,500 11,228.30 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION .00 144.54 .00 96 150 5.46 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 3,184.88 .00 24 13,500 10,315.12 DEPT 105 TOTAL ******** 44,539.56 288,594.93 .00 57 509,964 221,369.07 SUPPORT SERVICES 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 8,711.36 69,818.72 .00 66 106,252 36,433.28 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 735.05 42,871.54 .00 69 62,295 19,423.46 400 SUPPLIES 545.72 4,991.07 .00 60 8,300 3,308.93 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 80.96 1,910.68 .00 45 4,200 2,289.32 700 MAINTENANCE .00 159.50 .00 53 300 140.50 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 2 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.6Th ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 135.95 2,521.33 .00 41 6,215 3,693.67 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,745.00 17,913.66 .00 100 17,925 11.34 DEPT 106 TOTAL ******** 12,954.04 140,186.50 .00 68 205,487 65,300.50 FINANCE 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 6,774.42 55,845.58 .00 65 85,430 29,584.42 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,102.98 24,330.48 .00 39 61,750 37,419.52 400 SUPPLIES 104.22 842.41 .00 24 3,500 2,657.59 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 862.76 1,816.40 .00 30 6,000 4,183.60 700 MAINTENANCE 1,975.08 1,975.08 .00 64 3,100 1,124.92 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 185.00 1,115.75 .00 47 2,378 1,262.25 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 700 700.00 DEPT 107 TOTAL ******** 12,004.46 85,925.70 .00 53 162,858 76,932.30 COURT 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 36,677.76 287,275.49 .00 61 471,041 183,765.51 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 185.00 485.00 .00 14 3,500 3,015.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 700 700.00 400 SUPPLIES 1,159.67 6,378.13 .00 51 12,450 6,071.87 500 OTHER EXPENSES 280.12 839.33 .00 56 1,500 660.67 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 31.95 461.00 .00 58 800 339.00 700 MAINTENANCE 3,887.34 12,231.38 .00 43 28,200 15,968.62 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 1,956.35 16,424.49 .00 61 27,122 10,697.51 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 298.27 3,528.42 .00 15 23,925 20,396.58 DEPT 131 TOTAL ******** 44,476.46 327,623.24 .00 58 569,238 241,614.76 FIRE SERVICES 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 53,265.48 438,250.38 .00 61 723,394 285,143.62 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 124.00 872.65 .00 25 3,500 2,627.35 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 2,856.19 7,604.31 .00 55 13,800 6,195.69 500 OTHER EXPENSES 38.88 347.96 .00 87 400 52.04 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 410.83 1,420.68 .00 71 2,000 579.32 700 MAINTENANCE 2,707.66 35,010.38 .00 56 62,700 27,689.62 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 3,159.22 13,981.98 .00 50 28,139 14,157.02 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 12,204.55 73,957.29 .00 98 75,400 1,442.71 DEPT 132 TOTAL ******** 74,766.81 571,445.63 .00 63 909,333 337,887.37 POLICE SERVICES . 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 22,372.04 190,184.80 .00 62 308,667 118,482.20 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 642.00 .00 32 2,000 1,358.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS 708.48 2,833.92 .00 67 4,250 1,416.08 400 SUPPLIES 765.19 5,365.92 .00 60 9,000 3,634.08 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 1,417.50 .00 142 1,000 417.50- 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 177.77 778.53 .00 37 2,100 1,321.47 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 3 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 700 MAINTENANCE 8,787.50 19,906.11 .00 59 33,500 13,593.89 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 138.14 1,863.25 .00 29 6,335 4,471.75 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 10,765.55 .00 90 12,000 1,234.45 DEPT 133 TOTAL ******** 32,949.12 233,757.58 .00 62 378,852 145,094.42 PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPORT 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 9,939.13 84,299.99 .00 66 128,290 43,990.01 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 260.00 .00 7 3,600 3,340.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 115.48 1,905.94 .00 51 3,750 1,844.06 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 21.24 .00 21 100 78.76 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 21.15 402.63 .00 30 1,350 947.37 700 MAINTENANCE 436.64 1,611.81 .00 32 5,050 3,438.19 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 895.45 3,142.98 .00 52 6,030 2,887.02 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 104.79 12,231.69 .00 89 13,700 1,468.31 DEPT 142 TOTAL ******** 11,512.64 103,876.28 .00 64 161,870 57,993.72 BUILDING 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 . .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 DEPT 143 TOTAL ******** .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 PLANNING & ZONING 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 16,245.84 155,483.63 .00 57 273,205 117,721.37 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,282.50 34,931.60 .00 62 55,900 20,968.40 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 2,125.00 .00 30 7,000 4,875.00 400 SUPPLIES 12.05- 141.56 .00 33 425 283.44 500 OTHER EXPENSES 1,511.45 13,940.66 .00 49 28,500 14,559.34 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .29 .00 0 0 .29- 700 MAINTENANCE 15,276.03 117,929.64 .00 66 177,500 59,570.36 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 711.75 2,639.19 .00 82 3,200 560.81 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 110,620.98 140,749.14 .00 42 338,000 197,250.86 DEPT 144 TOTAL ******** 145,636.50 467,940.71 .00 53 883,730 415,789.29 STREETS 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 5,325.76 21,047.56 .00 40 53,150 32,102.44 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 388.70 3,298.70 .00 97 3,400 101.30 400 SUPPLIES 952.03 922.52 .00 20 4,650 3,727.48 500 OTHER EXPENSES 2,552.57 10,116.10 .00 62 16,200 6,083.90 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 35.96 63.36 .00 63 100 36.64 700 MAINTENANCE 2,503.55 9,941.29 .00 60 16,600 6,658.71 FUND 100 GENERAL FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 4 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.6796 ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 444.89 460.89 .00 31 1,495 1,034.11 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,719.23 14,328.28 .00 33 44,000 29,671.72 DEPT 145 TOTAL ******** 14,922.69 60,178.70 .00 43 139,595 79,416.30 PARKS AND RECREATION 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 7,014.15 33,689.27 .00 40 84,564 50,874.73 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 16.00 .00 2 950 934.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 400 SUPPLIES 51.75 646.59 .00 81 800 153.41 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 0 300 300.00 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 12.19 154.73 .00 19 800 645.27 700 MAINTENANCE .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 247.00 3,797.23 .00 60 6,325 2,527.77 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 .00 .00 0 0 .0D DEPT 146 TOTAL ******** 7,325.09 38,303.82 - .00 41 93,739 55,435.18 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 12,484.39 95,435.04 .00 71 133,543 38,107.96 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,680.00 37,852.11 .00 91 41,400 3,547.89 400 SUPPLIES 359.50 2,264.33 .00 84 2,700 435.67 500 OTHER EXPENSES 30.40 2,078.56 .00 72 2,900 821.44 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 428.16 3,928.55 .00 68 5,800 1,871.45 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 167.86 2,084.25 .00 41 5,045 2,960.75 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 8,682.06 .00 134 6,500 2,182.06- DEPT 150 TOTAL ******** 20,150.31 152,324.90 .00 77 197,888 45,563.10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND 100 TOTAL ******** 441,938.06 2,654,232.22 .00 59 4,499,392 1,845,159.78 FUND 400 GO BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 9 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.67% OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT ******YEAR-TO-DATE****** ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL %BUD REVENUE BALANCE 000 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 TAXES 110.00 AD VALOREM/CURRENT 26,423.51 788,800.35 98 807,049 18,248.65 111.00 AD VALOREM/DELINQUENT 728.36 30,288.76 30,288.76- 100 TAXES 27,151.87 819,089.11 101 807,049 12,040.11- 700 OTHER REVENUES 713.00 OPERATING TRANSFER IN 107,849 107,849.00 700 OTHER REVENUES 107,849 107,849.00 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 804.00 AD VALOREM - TRANSFER IN 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 900 INTEREST 910.00 INTEREST EARNED 1,300.36 7,957.49 53 15,000 7,042.51 900 INTEREST 1,300.36 7,957.49 53 15,000 7,042.51 000 * NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 28,452.23 827,046.60 89 929,898 102,851.40 TOTAL GO BOND DEBT SERVICE 28,452.23 827,046.60 89 929,898 102,851.40 FUND 400 GO BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 12 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 116,158.32 .00 46 250,963 134,804.68 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 416,217.40 .00 63 665,435 249,217.60 DEPT 000 TOTAL ******** .00 532,375.72 .00 58 916,398 384,022.28 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED FUND 400 TOTAL ******** .00 532,375.72 .00 58 916,398 384,022.28 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended May 31, 1993 and May 31, 1992 To Date Percent To Date Total Percent 1992-93 Actual Collected/ Actual Actual Collected/ REVENUES Budget 5/31/93 expended 5/31/92 9/30/92 expended Water Sales-residential $1,677,540 $980,687 58.5% $873,766 $1,557,620 56.1% Water Sales-commercial 419,385 214,289 51.1% 182,074 318,453 57.2% Sewer Sales 205,454 132,205 64.3% 118,260 185,824 63.6% Sanitation Sales 258,000 191,993 74.4% 152,987 235,603 64.9% Other utility charges 145,067 181,122 124.9% 116,115 276,578 42.0% Miscellaneous 22,118 46,144 208.6% 8,169 21,323 38.3% Interest Income 25,970 19,401 74.7% 20,310 35,693 56.9% Total Revenues $2,753,534 $1,765,841 64.1% $1,471,681 $2,631,094 55.9% EXPENSES Water $1,605,572 $704,174 43.9% $668,142 $1,244,888 53.7% Sewer 559,601 374,016 66.8% 393,020 866,652 45.3% Sanitation 232,200 148,249 63.8% 108,054 206,396 52.4% Debt Service- Revenue Bonds 79,719 46,503 58.3% 52,163 89,423 58.3% Other-Line Oversizing 25,000 3,072 12.3% 0 0 0.0% Transfers-other funds 267,295 0 0.0% 0 159,446 0.0% Total Expenses $2,769,387 $1,276,014 46.1% $1,221,379 $2,566,805 47.6% Net Income/(Loss) ($15,853) $489,827 $250,302 $64,289 FUND 200 WATER FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 REVENUE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 3 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.6Th OBJECT ACCOUNT CURRENT ******YEAR-TO-DATE****** ESTIMATED UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL $BUD REVENUE BALANCE 000 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 500 MISCELLANEOUS 510.00 MIS-INCOME 14.00 473.00 8 5,618 5,145.00 512.00 MIS-INSPECTION FEES 19,682.58 45,461.29 286 15,900 29,561.29- 513.00 MIS-RETURNED CHECK CHG 210.00 35 600 390.00 500 MISCELLANEOUS 19,696.58 46,144.29 209 22,118 24,026.29- 600 UTILITY CHARGES 611.00 WATER SALES-RESIDENTIAL 143,024.24 980,687.14 58 1,677,540 696,852.86 612.00 WATER SALES-COMMERICAL 27,766.80 214,289.16 51 419,385 205,095.84 613.00 WATER TAP 16,995.00 109,280.00 152 72,000 37,280.00- 614.00 BULK WATER 3,996.42 11,612.32 66 17,500 5,887.68 651.00 SEWER SALES 20,296.71 132,205.21 64 205,454 73,248.79 652.00 SEWER TAP 2,400.00 14,325.00 96 15,000 675.00 670.00 GARBAGE SALES 24,651.68 191,993.13 74 258,000 66,006.87 670.50 RECYCLING RECOVERY 682.00 METER BOX 35.00 35.00- 691.00 METER TEST 692.00 UNAPPLIED CASH 207.15 15,682.33 15,682.33- 693.00 SERVICE CHARGE 2,135.59 11,575.59 112 10,305 1,270.59- 694.00 LATE CHARGES 2,154.20 17,684.98 63 28,262 10,577.02 695.00 DELINQENT ACCT COLLECTIONS 696.00 RECONNECT FEE 140.00 925.00 46 2,000 1,075.00 600 UTILITY CHARGES 243,767.79 1,700,294.86 63 2,705,446 1,005,151.14 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 807.00 TRANSFER IN-WW/IMPROVE 800 NON-OPERATING REVENUE 900 INTEREST 910.00 INTEREST EARNED 3,335.85 19,401.28 75 25,970 6,568.72 900 INTEREST 3,335.85 19,401.28 75 25,970 6,568.72 000 * NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 266,800.22 1,765,840.43 64 2,753,534 987,693.57 TOTAL WATER FUND 266,800.22 1,765,840.43 64 2,753,534 987,693.57 FUND 200 WATER FUND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REPORT PRINT DATE- 6/10/93 DEPT/CATEGORY EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD ENDING 5/31/93 PAGE 5 FISCAL MONTH 08 66.67% ACCOUNT MTD *********** YEAR-TO-DATE *********** ANNUAL CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ENCUMBERED %BUD APPROPRIATION BALANCE 500 OTHER EXPENSES .00 49,574.35 .00 13 372,014 322,439.65 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 0 0 .00 DEPT 000 TOTAL ******** .00 49,574.35 .00 13 372,014 322,439.65 NON DEPARTMENTALIZED 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 20,164.80 202,644.73 .00 67 304,727 102,082.27 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 373.75 9,487.20 .00 27 35,000 25,512.80 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS 1,131.48 2,643.28 .00 44 6,000 3,356.72 400 SUPPLIES 297.03 1,755.53 .00 20 8,700 6,944.47 500 OTHER EXPENSES 59,144.22 344,891.58 .00 34 1,024,320 679,428.42 600 ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 230.57 9,796.90 .00 67 14,600 4,803.10 700 MAINTENANCE 4,580.24 50,473.61 .00 84 60,300 9,826.39 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 444.53 4,226.78 .00 67 6,300 2,073.22 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,840.32 78,254.65 .00 54 145,625 67,370.35 DEPT 147 TOTAL ******** 88,206.94 704,174.26 .00 44 1,605,572 901,397.74 WATER 100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 3,458.46 26,207.80 .00 48 54,689 28,481.20 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,131.25- 3,340.00 .00 33 10,000 6,660.00 300 LEASE OBLIGATIONS .00 .00 .00 0 5,000 5,000.00 400 SUPPLIES 135.00 862.48 .00 41 2,100 1,237.52 500 OTHER EXPENSES 876.75 7,398.58 .00 64 11,500 4,101.42 700 MAINTENANCE 9,927.54- 326,391.85 .00 69 471,412 145,020.15 800 PROFESSIONAL CONSIDERATION 103.00 878.08 .00 73 1,200 321.92 900 CAPITAL OUTLAY .00 8,937.49 .00 242 3,700 5,237.49- DEPT 148 TOTAL ******** 6,485.58- 374,016.28 .00 67 559,601 185,584.72 SEWER 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,878.12 148,249.22 .00 64 232,200 83,950.78 DEPT 149 TOTAL ******** 21,878.12 148,249.22 .00 64 232,200 83,950.78 SANITATION FUND 200 TOTAL ******** 103,599.48 1,276,014.11 .00 46 2,769,387 1,493,372.89 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE UTILITY BILLING MONTHLY REPORT MAY 1993 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR 5/31/93 4/30/93 5/31/92 ACCOUNTS BILLED: WATER $172,787.50 $143,814.88 $160,927.84 SEWER 20,296.71 17,737.42 15,774.63 GARBAGE 24,651.68 24,470.77 21,399.29 SALES TAX 1,790.97 1,765.96 1,544.83 RECYCLE 0.00 0.00 16.29 OTHER 2,041.92 2,271.10 2,100.98 TOTAL $221,568.78 $190,060.13 $201,763.86 NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS: WATER 2,963 2,943 2,542 SEWER 866 827 519 GARBAGE 2,957 2,944 2,587 TOTAL ACCOUNTS BILLED: 3,198 3,182 2,791 NEW CUSTOMERS: (increases for the month) WATER 20 41 19 SEWER 39 • 47 25 GARBAGE 13 40 3 TOTAL ACCOUNTS BILLED 16 40 10 • CONSUMPTION BILLED (IN 000'S): WATER 34,459 25,188 33,182 SEWER 13,565 8,690 0 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SALES TAX REVENUES six year comparison 1992-93 collected budget balance budget to date balance percent $579,000 $346,836 $232,164 40.10% FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL ::FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL ....YEAR YEAR % Inc YEA:t< % Inc .YEAR'` % Inc YEAR'. %Inc YEAR: %Inc Dec ' ``9� > Dec MONTH 87/88:: :< ::88L89.;;:_ (Dec) ': 89/9.Q: (Dec) >9.0191 : (Dec) ;`91%92;:>:. (Dec) >;.921.. .:.:: (Dec) 8 < 16. 0 67 :1: % 9.0 0 October $35715 : $27>970°; -21.7% ';::$3.T7:74 35.1% `$4'A,0 1. % ...$ ,...3..: $SQ;956 _ 126% 50.8 0 November ::>22`647' ":>: 5'428 -31.9% ::.»>24573` 59.3% ' 37:1:1:7: 51.0% ;.:2 92. % 4�12 . % 4': 35.2 0 ::<;'S>33''73 1 9% 7 December :<..... .' ::.,;J 7 830> 9.2% 2 052 18.1% ;: 28,46 , %• ,2.... .;3 ,SSQ. January :'32703.:<> 26`75fi -18.2% :<;>3'4�4G�; 28.8% ...::..:,10, % .. ,Q1_... 7,713.. 69.2 0 . o 78.4 0 19 ;. .4 48T -12.1 0 ';;',4010 ;> % % February :13<]:63> ;'15''894' 20.7% 25 �.... 61.0% :s ?,�,:...... , % , ...6 39,�;51: '.44�176' 17.8 0 7.5 0 37 4$8 13.8 0 ::> 4 7 %58.5 0 <[>30`G57: 107.5 0 »>32 955:; % %March ' :::��25:::`014778' % :>::::.. •�.::;.::. °� ::.>:.>:.; :�;;::.:;:: ,.;... <?�; ,; 3 0.::...5''3 38. 0 64: 19 %5 ' 3:;>;;0': - .5 0 >Q 445 11.4 0 4 8% 6 April 37;845 >:4$635: 28. % .:7,21 23 % : ,..::.. % , $,6 :...; 16.3 0 ''`41'020. 12.0 0 .>•.;::>::»;>;: '.': Ma 15 510.. >>:>2.. .:..,., y 7;824:; 79.4% > 31501 13.2% ' .6 62Z.; % ,. % :::7>:::94: .20 ::: 4 ;1 5 13.80 :> > ;>> June `: ::22195... `24'051 8.4% <'.<:':37 447 55.7% ``::3..89 .. 1 % 3 10 % ... ..:.. . .;: >> : ......::July ; '32,159 3.5,630:: 20.1% '<: 51: 374 33.0% 0.47:�0: 7 -8.5% • 51,3:>7; 9.2% `:" . August 75 , :2_2 . -6.1 0 >3.>.::.<.6 40.8 0 > >35 ..51: 12.5 0 `.:.48,7 � 35.5 0 ":'> >'< > ?> g 24,1 22,699: % . ..31;9G9 % 35,951 % ,, 31 % September 4 63.0 0 :::2::: 4.2 0 >'3: :0:0::<:: 13.9 0 :42;..:....., 5.5 0 '> > <'''` p >>19,1 1:;;>,31204 % .:: 32,499 % .:: 3�,004. % ,Z41 1 % : ;>;::::<.;..;.;. TOTAL ,90 :: 11.0 0 27.1 0 ::<:::8;:1 13. o S 5: 0` � 3.8 0 .$$:40 22.5 0$280.. 1 $311,69;,.9; % $ 961f16: % 5448,148: 1% $. 1,. ,036 1 % 5 46,836 % REPORT DATE 06/10/93 MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT APRIL/MAY 1993 COMPARISON APRIL MAY 1 1. NUMBER OF CASES FILED: 422 418 2. DISPOSITIONS PRIOR TO TRIAL: A. Deposit Forfeitures 0 0 B. Payments of Fine 160 109 C. Cases Dismissed 71 54 3. DISPOSITIONS AT TRIAL: A. Trial by Judge 0 5 (1) Finding of Guilty 0 3 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 B. Trial by Jury (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 C. Dismissed at Trial 0 0 4. CASES DISMISSED: A. After Defensive Driving 21 24 B. After Deferred Adjudication 11 8 C. After Proof of Insurance 51 43 5. CASES APPEALED 0 0 6. WARRANTS ISSUED 0 0 TOTAL REVENUE COLLECTED: CITY $12,672.50 $ 9,634.20 STATE 4,925.00 3,642.50 TOTAL 17,597.50 13,276.70 • - MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT MAY 1993 TRAFFIC NON TRAFFIC Non State City Parking Parking Law Ordinance Total 1. NUMBER OF CASES FILED: 393 5 19 1 418 2. DISPOSITIONS PRIOR TO TRIAL: A. Deposit Forfeitures 0 0 0 0 0 B. Payments of Fine 96 1 9 3 109 C. Cases Dismissed 50 0 3 1 54 3. DISPOSITIONS AT TRIAL: A. Trial by Judge (1) Finding of Guilty 5 0 0 0 5 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 3 0 0 0 3 B. Trial by Jury (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 C. Dismissed at Trial 0 0 0 0 0 4. CASES DISMISSED: A. After Defensive Driving 24 0 0 0 24 B. After Deferred Adjudication 8 0 0 0 8 C. After Proof of Insurance 43 0 0 0 43 5. CASES APPEALED 0 0 0 0 0 6. WARRANTS ISSUED 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REVENUE COLLECTED: CITY $ 9,634.20 STATE 3,642.50 TOTAL 13,276.70 • • ADMINISTRATIVE CALENDAR PUBLIC SAFETY MONTH: May. 1993 PROJECT DESCRIPTION >:.. '< :::,>s:':<: r ><:::. :': .;EST : . PHASE START END::` . n:.::. COMPLETED REMARKS 1.Wrecker Ordinance Aug /Sept 70% At Attorney's Office/MJ not reviewed 2 .Hiring Budgeted Personnel Oct /July 95% 1 Communicator Hired, 2 Fire Hired, Accepting applications for 1 Police Officer and 1 Communicator 3 .Animal Control /July 70% For Council Action on Policies 4 .Breathing Air Comp. Aug / 25% Dir Williams Handling/Specs Purchase being written 5 .SCBA Aug / 50% On Order 6 .Computer Networking Oct /Aug 80% Assigned to GG - Licensing and final network connections 7 .Hose Drying Cabinet Oct / 100% Bid awarded 8. Truck Route Ordinance Oct / Dir Campbell Handling 9 . Hepatitis Program Oct 92/ 75% Bobby Finn Handling 10.Uniform Policy Oct /Aug 80% Employee Council & Director Review 11.Career Development/Step & 40% To be included in 1993-94 Grade Budget 12 .Evidence Property Oct /Sept 60% Reorganization Conversion • ADMINISTRATIVE CALENDAR PUBLIC SAFETY MONTH: May, 1993 13.Reports & Records System Oct /Sept 75% • Part of computer networking and reorganization 14 . IAD/Discipline Policy Oct /Sept 80% Director Review 15 .Booking Room Oct /Oct 20% 16 .CID Crime & Photo Kits Oct /Sept 70% Reorganization/GG Handling 17 .Contracts Review Oct /Aug 5% Dir Jackson Handling • 18 .Monthly Reports Oct /July 95% Computerization 19 .Policy Manual Oct /Oct 20% On going two-year project ra 20 .Update Employee Data Oct /Aug 80% Dept Mtg - Forms review/Dir Jackson handling 21. 22 . • 23. 24 . SPECIAL PROJECTS 25 . 800 mHz Oct /92-93BY 99% Portables in - Medic 1, Rescue 1, HazMat 1 complete Minor tuning problems 26 .Bank Security Review Dec /July 50% Gary Gregg Handling 27 . 28 . SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MONTHLY REPORT May, 1993 POLICE SERVICES Citations Issued 416_ Residential Burglaries _2_ Arrests _20_ Business Burglaries _3_ Traffic Accidents _23_ Vehicle Burglaries _0_ Alarm Calls _117_ Assaults _5_ Animal Calls _63_ New CID cases assigned _39_ Thefts Under $750 _7_ CID Investigations Cleared _20_ Thefts $750 and up _7_ Active CID Investigations _128_ FIRE SERVICES Residential Fires 2 Ambulance Calls: Commercial Fires 1 Vehicle Accidents 5 Other Building Fires _0 Non-accident EMS _22_ Vehicle Fires _2_ Total Patients Transported _18_ } Grass Fires _3_ Grass/Weed Complaints _21_ Fire Alarms - False 15 Burn Permits Issued 85 Fuel Spills/Leak 3_ Pre-fire Inspections _3_ Other Haz-Mat Calls _0_ Building Plans Reviewed _8_ Bomb Threats 0 Other Fire Calls 15 SUPPORT SERVICES Total Police Service Calls _543_ Total Training Hours: Total Fire Service Calls 43 Police 12 Crime Prevention Surveys *_ Fire _24_ Total DARE Classes Taught *_ Communications 0 Warrants Received 0 Volunteers 12 Warrants Cleared 7 Total Personnel Trained 14 Total Warrant Collections $1, 114 .50 9-1-1 Hang-up Investigations 4 *Special Services Officer in Supervisory School - Crime Prevention and DARE figures unavailable. PU B L | C WO R KS PROJECTS DELIVERED ADV- I' Midsize Truck 9/15/92 10/I3/92 10/30/92 12/I/92 2 ' Mowing Tractor 12/15/92 I/I2/93 I/I9/g3 3/5/93 ' ] . JaIIioo Circle 9/I5/93 I0/I3/92 I8/30/93 0-4/02/93 07/28/93 4 . Continental Blvd' (County) 09/I5/93 I0/30/93 S . Cr000timbaro . 6 . Parking Lot 05/16/93 09/0I/93 7. Park Community Building I2/I5/92 0I/26/92 02/2/33 07/I6/93 08/I5/93 8 . 3/4-ton Troo}c 05/07/93 9 . I21x SG' Maoof.' Bldg. I0/06/93 1I/10/92 1I/I7/93 11/30/92 0I/15/33 10 . Plug WoIIa I0/86/92 II/I0/92 I1/I7/92 11/30/92 0I/08/93 II . FM I709/Wator Line ReI II/03/92 I3/08/92 I2/15/92 01/04/93 09/01/93 12 . 3-2 Sewer Line 05/27/93 07/06/93 07/36/93 10/3I/93 I] ' Street Bond, Phase I 02/02/93 03/09/93 06/0I/93 07/01/93 08/30/93 14 . Water Improvements, Phase IZI 03/02/93 03/30/93 04/06/93 04/26/93 07/i5>93 15 . Storage Building for Records- 07/I5/93 lG ' 17. 18 . 19 . 20 . 21. City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 08, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Street Department Monthly Report - May, 1993. The enclosed report details the Street Department activities for the month of May, 1993 . This report is to be included in the City Council packets for their June 15, 1993 meeting. 3-ev4/2-74-et) RW/ck �- H11 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 08, 1993 TO: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works FROM: Brad Payton, Street Superintendent SUBJECT: Monthly Report for Street Department May, 1993. Description Apr. May 1 . Tons of asphalt used a. Ultimate Petroleum Mix 0 0 b. Hot Mix Asphalt 0 0 c . Cold Mix Asphalt 300 250 d. Base Material 500 400 2 . Lane Miles of Road Repaired 125 115 3 . Number of Street Signs Repaired or Replaced (all types) 31 28 4 . Feet of Ditch Line Cleaned and shaped 450 400 5 . Number of Vehicles Repaired 3 1 a. Front end loader engine is being rebuilt 6 . Row mowed in miles of streets 75 80 BP/cbk 4 2. City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 08 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Water Department Monthly Report - May, 1993. The enclosed report details the Water Department activities for the month of May, 1993 . This report is to be included in the City Council packets for their June 15, 1993 meeting. 630tilrat•O‘ RW/ck UTILITY DEPARTMENT REPORT MONTH May, 1993 APR. MAY GALLONS PUMPED FROM WELLS 0 0 PURCHASED FROM FORT WORTH 38, 105,000 54,702,000 TOTAL PUMPED AND PURCHASED 38, 105,000 54,702,000 WATER METERS SET 34 55 NEW WATER TAPS MADE 7 4 VALVES REPAIRED 11 18 VALVES TESTED 3 9 FIRE HYDRANTS INSTALLED 0 0 FIRE HYDRANTS REPAIRED 0 1 FIRE HYDRANTS FLUSHED 1 1 DEAD END WATER MAINS FLUSHED 0 0 WATER MAINS REPAIRED 2 0 WATER METERS AND SERVICE LINE REPAIRED 7 9 NEW ACCOUNTS 52 51 FINAL ACCOUNTS 52 44 LOCKED METER FOR DELINQUENT PAYMENT 6 11 PULLED METERS 0 3 METERS REPLACED 4 3 MISCELANEOUS WORK ORDERS 94 113 SEWER LIFT STATIONS CHECKED (4 L. S . ) 88 100 REQUIRED MONTHLY SEWAGE TESTS 10 8 SEWER PLANT MAINTENANCE (BANK & DOVE) 44 48 SEWER MANHOLES INSPECTED 5 1 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS 1 0 WATER SUPERINTENDENT ,67,,,A44100e30)0LA, I' DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS '`t ® City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 10, 1993 To: Curtis Hawk, City Manager From: Kim Bush, Secretary to the City Manager 0 Subject : Ordinance No. 583, 2nd Reading, a Franchise Agreement with Sammons Cable Co. for Cable Service in Parts of Southlake Attached is Ordinance No. 583 , an agreement between the City of Southlake and Sammons Cable Co. to provide cable service to portions of the City of Southlake. Sammons currently serves approximately 47 homes near the Southlake/Keller border. Sammons was providing service to residents in western sections of the City at the time these areas were annexed in 1988 . Mr. Tom Soulsby, General Manager of Sammons Cable Co. appeared before City Council at the 1st reading April 6, 1993 , to respond to questions and describe cable service operations under the proposed franchise agreement . Since approval on first reading, the second reading on the item was tabled on April 20 , May 4, and June 1 . It was tabled last Council meeting to allow Mr. Soulsby to speak with his attorney in reference to the changes proposed by our attorney. At last meeting negotiations were ongoing between the City Attorney and legal representatives for Sammons regarding two remaining issues, including: (1) The insertion of an indemnity clause. (2) Future State and federal regulations which might necessitate amending the franchise if verbiage is not included to address such issues . (The City Attorney believes that if Sammons does not expand their service area this issue should not present a problem with regard to City regulation of cable service from Sammons . ) Mr. Soulsby will be present to address City Council concerning the above issues . There are indications that the issues outstanding will be resolved prior to the meeting. As of today, we have not received word from Mr. Soulsby as to the progress of the negotiations . Hopefully we will have the answer prior to City Council meeting. /kb ORDINANCE NO. 583 3 _. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAXE, TEXAS, GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO SAMMONS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, TO OWN, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN THE CITY; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS ACCOMPANYING THE GRANT OF FRANCHISE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AND EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR ACCEPTANCE. WHEREAS, it is the mutual desire of the City of Southlake and Sammons Communications, Inc. to adopt a cable television franchise on the terms and conditions set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAXE, TEXAS: SECTION 1: Sbort Title. This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the "Sammons Communications, Inc. Franchise Ordinance." SECTION 2: Definitions. For the purpose of this Ordinance the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein. When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future, words in the plural number include the singular number and words in the singular number include the plural number. The word "shall" is always mandatory and not merely directory. (a) "City" earns -is the City of Southlake, Texas. (b) "Company" means the grantee of rights under this Ordinance awarding a franchise, being Sammons Communications, Inc. (c) "Person" *040g any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company or organization of any kind. (d) "Cable Television System" or "System" Shall means a system of antennae, cables, wires, lines, towers, waveguides or other conductors, converters, equipment or facilities designed and - 1 - /72-/ constructed for the purpose of producing, receiving, amplifying and distributing audio, video and other forms of electronic or electrical signals located in the City. (e) "Gross Subscriber Revenues" shall means the gross amount received from the operation of all facets of the Company's business arising from operations within the City. SECTION 3: Qualifications of Grantee and Grant of Authority. A public hearing concerning the franchise herein granted to the Company was held on at o'clock at the Public notice of Said hearing was given in the , which notice invited interested partic3 to participate in said hearing and comment upon the legal, character, financial, technical and other qualification3 of the Company to operate a Cable Television System in the City. Said:-ITA1 hearing having been held on the date and place. 3tatcd hcrcinabove and Said hearing having been fully open to the public, and the City having received at said hearing all comments regarding the qualifications of the Company to receive this franchise, the City Cc31 hereby finds that the Company possesses the necessary legal, technical, character, financial and other qualifications, and that therefore the City ig0.6464A hereby grants to the Company a non-exclusive franchise, right and privilege to construct, erect, operate, modify and maintain in, upon, along, across, above and over and under the highways, streets, alleys, sidewalks, public ways and public places now laid out or dedicated and all extensions thereof, and additions thereto, in the City, poles, wires, cables, - 2 - 7a.-2. underground conduits, manholes and other television conductors and fixtures necessary for the maintenance and operation in the City of a Cable Television System for the purpose of distributing television and radio signals and various communications and other electronic services to the public. The right so granted includes the right to use and occupy said streets, alleys, public ways and public places and all manner of easements for the purposes herein set forth. SECTION 4: Franchise Term. The Franchise granted the Company herein shall terminate 15 years from the date of City . Council final adoption of this ordinance. A "t >t me the Company ?4vT::J;\}\-ii::::.vi::i ri Jn•:,dCi::i�. shall be entitled to apply for franchise renewal. t'. e' ranch federal, state<`` ::and:<':>l;ocal>'la >< SECTION 5: Payments to the City. The Company shall, during each year of operation under this Franchise, pay to the City an annual sum of five (5%) percent of the Gross Subscriber Revenues received by the Company from operations within the City for the prior year. At the time of payment, the Company shall furnish the City with a report showing the Company's Gross Subscriber Revenues during the preceding year. Each annual payment will be made to the City within 30 days after the end of each year. Such sum shall be compensation for the rights, privileges and franchise and in consideration of permission to use public streets and ways within the City and in lieu of street and alley rentals and charges for supervision for use of public streets and ways within the City. - 3 - 7a. -3 SECTION 6: Records and Reports. The Company shall keep full , true, accurate and current books of account reflecting Gross Subscriber Revenues, which books and records shall be made available for inspection and copying by the City's designee at all reasonable times subject to the privacy provisions of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended. SECTION 7: Subscriber Rates. iTa4amiNi%4i,:iucoigigig#2towiwpagot4-4# §41tAmgoogtkv - uctzatax40104-7oogmlog §:#134#04S064411.1%0A§iiVIZIA§ ti • naii#470-#wogia rgq41 - .' .4g44:1*Fipp47.16ggkio0efg4g1•01VTOORY;74. *g§41444 al1 ether charges made in connection with the Cable Televisqi System, which rates uill beset ir compliance with the federal la :1At444T474§b4:gitiiiTP;t#kii!Pitt;i.J4iNWAt40tWOlii4.4300#t#:ggPaggIOA4 'gii6ga.filgOtir.f.:44.0.14.4407#*1 .1*.ifT:OTOTOSHEO'fi.01.0.0g1t#0:#:g§#144 g§iii:i44ti#A #g&ttOtiTg#Aii§ki4bS40* tiX*4ith4ighkigittik0A PIWPOWINEMTINfOlaPgiiiii401t.1044t§t200X414401ni!iiX4giiAgUtsopft #401ii0PT#PVWtg4g14 ###W*t0400#401:. teRgaligefil54M2k15115160XXAMIg268.6.6aiffigSBIM8iiintrgilbgefiffeEg 0#Writatts. Attached hcrcto and made a part of this franchi3c a3 Exhibit A i3 a schedule of current rates for basic cable television service. Such rates may be increased or dccr ased by 5amm0n3 from time to time. SECTION 8: Complaint Procedures: The Company shall maintain an office accessible by a toll free telephone number 365 days a year, 24 hours a day, to receive service complaints. Such complaints shall be responded to within 24 hours excepting delays resulting from Acts of God, strikes or other circumstances beyond - 4 - the control of the Company. Any service complaints from subscribers shall be investigated and acted upon as soon as possible. The Company shall keep a maintenance service log which will indicate the nature of each service complaint and the time and date thereof. This log shall be made available for periodic inspection by the City. SECTION 9: Liability and Indemnification. The Company shall pay, and by its' acceptance of this franchise, the Company expressly agrees that it will Ynxe..:.r: f�sgq.ge.claadhac >A,....ar4esa mYo}+},.:.;n•.•.a»}„ti_,x,.�.{:,c-:.}:•.,:ta•»r-,:a�,Gx,�...:...,��-!... v„yy.»y!.,}}„K thex:tm tjr><a: a s a ;=:ggp pays all damages < and penalties which the City may legally be required to pay as a result of the Company's negligence in installation, operationT or maintenance of the Cable Television System authorized herein. The City shall notify the Company's representative within fifteen (15) days after the presentation of any claim or demand- to the City, either by suit or otherwise, made against the City on account of any negligence or contract as aforesaid on the part of the Company. mgmaggszt .. .:::..,.:.a..�:..,..,,x,:..,..,,,a.naa..,a..,a aa-..:.,..�.,,a-.,.:. a,..,-.. ..,..,..•::.,,aa..aax.,a:,,a,::.-,:.,..,.:::.aaa..a,..,a,.: . .:.: .:.a. w:.,.4.....::}}:}4::ii}:is'.:.n:.....:\:::........:....... ...... :^}4»:.}'na}\:bj}J}?!ri::r�:::....ii:i.}}i::aJJ}}y}:n:{•`\:}w!by.•n}yJ•v.-}:A v} i 0244d 44,*44.1 :r�:..a...clai m::>ass0.t01: :10. ..13,:.ene'e... ... h .... a .. f 3W4 .....:...........::.::..... ......... ::::.w: ::::::: v:rv:}.w A::;}^:}: ..... ... ...... .......: }::.?..:i::::nv:::::........rv.:::??vl?.Jx:: :::L,•::irF.?-0h ::.-:mvw::w:::::w::. vv:.v.... .w:::.,,•.:.,v.,-'n,i'.Y!::r::.J'.:y:.v:.::!.v., ::vv..,..n. v„v�:::-•:::r:.,..,v:.. ..vwx.::-:•x!:..vy:::v-vf:::•.,,vn•:.:::•ny :nr.t{?.}•n;:!{-..}-.:!4T'rYY:]^%^'M.?Y':::i Corz an-. . „<,;thez:�:=:tom an : >�s�a��::><>:>:de��enr�:�::<:::«<t� �.:�.,,-::.�3..t;. :::a:. � ��nst«::><<:>s�c ,:,�,,,»,,.........,.,...::,!{, a::;:i; :::::: ,,.,..!.,,,..,,.....,,,.,,,.,»..,.,.,,,.,».,.,.,...xv.'•: ! ;:{ ,.„�''[h{.:} .,...,,,.,,,,»x.:x,»»,,,,,x.,,,x,;a ..r....{....}v;.:6'r••xra:r.:i :: ::f:i: .;r.Y!�{.:b. ..i{P:C{r•!p:{! �C;{n._a,\{!r•. :{.\�h...: y^{!{:u{: rayv{:{{!xii{\jN.i�^..y{p{••.: {v{{{C{vv...CY!:a:'!M:?{^.!;i.{{!.;.•,!-'k:":MCM:N.KK a a:hiamis:: Pb t standlin.:;;:.:fie tare ®im :€i�i€ to fit' .,:>:::�:ANO ...........A.v.•�1n....r.n.w..lvn,.,.vn.n..,,,,w.,xwr....x.n\.,., ,w:::nvn.,..r.,.,...rr$rn».r:.....v...x.v.•xv.}i.n..m.4 x:.xxT ,v}}:vi}}.wr.,w.xv.,,.,..Y.n....A�.,�iivri,{•:avin-\iiiJn,,•}}}::•iviNi} :,}}v..ny}-,}.wx}}}}J}\}Jv•.nV,}J},,w„},u,,v,.,..},}J^..' :ax.},}},.},},•.{nv.}:C••}xJ:'.a:-.:•}4.,..aJ}:.•}}}}?h:^},}v.ay..}is+v{•ipx\,}y,}--n;..Ja}}„}}}}.-};••}xv»uv.»v,}}f}}x:.:}}}}}Taxi:}:::}'.."}}},}},.m.v•,]�}•,JJ\v to hate"been MAIP§§ w th<> respect'' Riffi$ta> a gi w-" to`tt . 4rrn,xwt•:,,x,r..v.{xwµu{�rm•:�,+:a,Ti,Y+Awvw�ww. .+n.rw r w.ui 4nv:•iC4:vrJ.•irn.,nnn}r.. ....xn.wru .. n-n rr • „.;.,,,,},„:....a-.a;.i�a:.}:.a.,,,Jr}..�,..��}�}Jryr•... }...roJ:.;e;...:••.�icJ}w}xJ}},yv,..;{.{.;.;;: ::}r�,,.:.:.};r•-:.>}}�-}:a,:a,:,}}a\a:{.}}J.`•"}}w}•-{!?r>}}Y}'�i}:{{x•}}x.•'t.�a»:o}};!n}:`:.}:;.rwr!�:x{{.}}:rY on•{}}.'•:'{o}rr•Rnuc'•- miszi keim'lturs� a Dam an trig eesF,. ccsts~ �'�an x§ensee.rge' sated .,- ,,,.»„x,c.,:a::oc{! h:.«., a\w„»„a»,xx. .,„,...x!«{" ,,.{,xt„»,,;; ...:....,......#{�,��:{{{{r„,,,,a{at{a{,,. ..,xa „x;i«;{;::,:«,:,{:�yu vaY :1^i{•\`M•+,.: ,{}J.4+,]h\'-+:—•c<"^r�"\,....'C'l'K..?!{M`!{.`!^Jif4Ya:{ c*r !{{'!!!K�xv+M'.w{.w.»v;{n••.v},:}a:C!tP:!!"+:{r{i'x.:.X!c.•Cecc :'oOcc t{ c c.iM,,^^.,.c •:{.{. {.y{\••{{r.{{{{q:`n:{H"�:!•CSavY.Y{%'K,C9[ . e :t: ,: <: e:..e .fie:«{«: >.:. i>k,. : : >:t>; :t. ':. s;�ce:ferrse t�::<'>; h ... �. <�::...:.+.:{.... . n . . .T�i�::::.>:am� t:...r�Ia�ed....�a:.,.. �i:�<; �. w::n3:.}i!iviri:{vi4}ivr:::rxx:h�v».:v.,:rh t,isiwi.J.:-:;;Jwx-XV:v:.4:::}:xa:iJiL-:}:.'1'-.,:Av:Jw-:i+.-::+:v.v:.Ji}}:::k?v::r:::.v:.:.:v}.v:.:.. 4•.4:4tiA•.r.,w W.viwnx::}:: vS,k TriS:,"Ai}w`%{4i:}»}:WSi{ti x„+..:..Y....a}}J:\}}JJ}}JTi JJw}}t }}}xyJJ-.\V,\'vx a,, •-x, ;.}a}}\}}}.^..xxa..,xa„vv»a}\`i .}JJ}J}Jh:. }:•.\`.'ly}J:...V}....tli}\}! ill}-x.. }:4x}}J}}:d}:p}}.1�%O`:•:nM:.4T}�\4'.}} JJ•,: .rl" rii:\i- �: w-i sl::}<> a:;}::::§a :Finis ed::f475 <the<::0,00::100tcen »>o=f €::< #Ze:=::fees :ii•:ct stg�. sgten x,,,w.,,.r:...rx„Wx:;.::rxr.,.»,,„r.�....w,..a..� r.,-:.,....-,.x..-..:r :.,.xr:xxr.,-::.:r}.;n;..i:;.riiM•i}i::.};:«;w,:.:,}r;.x.;:i•.;}:;::>.,:.}:{-i:;{....... rr.,. ...... s,.N:;w}:;};:v :gJ:N,wxv:y{!l}}Jv .y.nvmav,••>%)'/.'}:»\:.:vhiiw.•n.: .v.v w..........::::nx xa. r •, ...;... .:...,{.v}: - ..w:: ....:.....J.:•..., .:a.:::::: :4:......:i•.... }}:-'f.:::4}::•.J}}tir:Lir'"':J}:iJ:.\:•:;': }:^'f.'l.:v.vv.j�?f':'}:':J,jCa't :\:iii. erases<:::><::a � ..af>>.ne. 1�''"enc�:::��€:>f`uun�>'� ��:<�«a���`<'co�rt...,.t. .fie aftrg jgagogg g t:J g The Company further agrees as :follows: (a) Company shall carry Worker' s Compensation insurance, - 5 - with statutory limits, and Employer' s Liability insurance with limits of not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100, 000) , which shall cover all operations to be performed by Company as a result of this Ordinance. (b) Company shall carry Comprehensive General Liability and Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500, 000) per occurrence, and property damage limits of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) : (c) Company agrees to furnish City with certificates of insurance of said policies, which shall provide that insurance shall not be cancelled unless ten days' prior written notice shall first be given to City. (d) It is expressly agreed and understood that the Company is an independent contractor and in no event shall Company's employees be deemed to be employees of the City. SECTION 10: System Construction, Maintenance and Procedures. (a) 114iiiiiggitidgMat'dffalti Upon grant of this Franchise to construct and maintain a Cable Television System in the City, the Company may enter into contracts with any Public Utility companies . or any other owner or lessee of any poles located within or without the City to whatever extent such contract or contracts may be expedient and of advantage to the Company for use of poles and posts necessary for proper installation of the System, obtain right-of-way permits from appropriate state, county and federal officials necessary to cross highways or roads under their - 6 - 7Q-6 respective jurisdictions to supply main trunk lines from the Company' s receiving antennae, obtain permission from the Federal Aviation Authority to erect and maintain antennae suitable to the needs of the System and its subscribers and obtain whatever other 'permits a city, county, state or federal agency may require. In the construction, installation and maintenance of its System, the Company will use steel, cable and electronic devices, all of specialized and advanced design and type. In the operation of its System, the Company will -employ personnel with training, skill and experience in electronics and communications. It is recognized that neither material nor' personnel of this sort may be available to the Company for its System in the event of a war or other similar national emergency. :, -tip:{{{;:..........:;{,vp:{c.{,. {:..,{ :T:{{•}};{;{.>:'✓ ::.'t.{.:.}}}:L.i:<.:ti;{.:{{i{.:{:.:{-v, :t.::.{+i:.:{4:;•}:.. ?:•ti{•.:i..:^!{{,a:..» i0i0tva}, ....Al�:.... .rarisz� szon:>and>d:�str�3�:�zt�d��s :tt�res:;:::::::�.z:u. ' ,.:.................:�:: :. ......:_:::::;-:TTT;:•}T::•>:}}};T}:;:;:;•};}}}-:;•TT'-:<{�:::::._'.T-.:T:;::.,_:.:::,-.::,:.}'.}:::.T'.T'{•;:-;T>T;<.�:.::.:::..::.::.:_::::.::'::: ���<{•T:.033 ,:{.iY.n:.}}\.}vW:xyvv\};•i}}J}}y'{•±:. -:;•Y}}}};.}}}a,}:n}vv:}a}i.y.:.}•�::.»v:--vvaw:.ay.»:,v:•.,•.,,va n v::T.4'n±:-}}}ax::.}:aa;�.±..,...}}}N.aK±.:r:v:}.. �..±•.�{.v}}Y{• ;:.}}.. ..-... ....p ..i......:...:.:{:......nY,:Sa.;.}}}•:�ap}},}::}}::X..;}}}••tSp:<{.h},.......xi} e. . •ment;:<::::�anr:>>;:fac:a:: : �b: ses::::4rec: :ed:±T0r; maanta: rxed>{::: s::±}:<;Graee:.,;izt"b:51 ...............................r.......~r..:n„~..,.....r...,,.....: r.....r.....,...........,......,...r........:r...,..........,.....a,,..:.}:r::.,.::::::......v..:,�.r...,.......:..::.;:::.;}:TT:;:..:::.:..:{;.;TT::;.;x}h,k,}: ,}}T� t e' i i :..ani be��>so�>�lot 4 :>o::e?.=; ..: ::' ' ::.:.. :. ::>:>; .t ::< '-.40:: . ::: 1 .,..,...»..nv.Aa ,,a.n..,».....:..,,..,:<,-..,..., »,.»..x..,....,......,..,,....n..aa......,,n.,,»,a,:m,..». .:L•.:..v. ...n,.».,....a...v..x.....,aaaa,»{-.»aaa»k,v{0.»»Yr :'t".:i{{:pTT:{•}T:!•:^::v{.:{{.:x.}}•{{rv:::rnt{<{.:{{!{n;{n;{.v..r....,;{.v};.}:{{--nv:.....v:x:i.;:{{!+m::TN:rrp...{;tx:r:-p}.3nv}•p:i:!'.:.,;}•rnvv::::Y.}:.v.rr.•rvyv,...Tv.}v{.}•{..r!x...- v,-„{xr{.'t<".:?{tt{CC!{ trie<:: r ert u zntende0 use of streets � . hwa s =<a I �{:::s 1PFAr ` :es ......................................:::::TITT}T:vTT::.....::}}T:. :.:... .....\::�}} :•iTv. '::{4:iT:T±�•:C:' lv_\ ...,....,....v:..:,---:::±:.:}:n,v.::v:_.�.. "•Y:J±±}}:{;:b:<^;•iyy±;•:•±i.'•.:::.,:,.. :.:.....,...:..,,.....�..:-:..:v•..,:..;..vaa„}a:.T}va-:n•.,,,,::.:r::-::.:::.::•!' ::T:..:... .:...[{.. ':±.±: •: .:. ..: .v..: ::}:;::.:..::;.}.�.,{±.::y.n{.;`;p;:.�:,p :{:: ;•.y:i};:...:... .:T::......�...:Y;±:Oi ;}};::::::-Y;:.i}±}••n..}y;.:-4}: :..}}}}}y:-;.,}w�y}}}T a d::ogget,;: .um : :<faa: ;: ;::;and;;>:" :apes ;:and:<:;tc ::>>;ca xso::: 4i40 interference ::,.:::::.::.::.::.:.::.::::r:r...... "..r.: :::::r:::::::: ...............'"'---..�?.:>::::r:.:}}};T::. ......»...:T}:}}}}:pr�::::.......T'.}:.}T:.}:.T}:T:::•::....T;T:.; .... .. rx... ^Y.!•:.:.:. :.::::?:. :.,x{:::.w::.v.Y.v±'::{:Y.•±}:{�};:tp;{tip:•'•-{{r•i}::;t?{ity.:::..};.,::.vv••::v::.::xw:.x:.x:::wnv•. -- :::.::::,::w:nvrvrv::w::.w:::::rxvvh...v:.,•n-:x::rxx:::xvxn••x,v oltp :>the:.:<-taq t s::>:txr>>::roasonabl:a:;;:;convettsoogizot� o` eto t .T: ;gg :'" :<._:.; t{<-}i -1:;{ :'•.,»S-.......{p}±:0:{:{;;;•rit:\p}:<;;{.n;;;:;:;;;p:{{{{ip:;;;{•:4:p:{;4::;V;<{i<;;:{ N;:{<;:p}T :h;<;;�\.:: {<:C;{{;<iii•�t;LiG< :a{«{{x�\i�<M,{{tC'vJ, { J�rX Y9C ... rr:{:. .. -wx: :}:.}:{;.;{:r::.:;.:":{:;{{{{::;{.:;..v.±.:::::..,.{::r:n.,.::..,.. .:....:v:n,».a.:x:..:::::»..a.:... :._:{:.::.Y,�.,;yTp:;:{4}:?.,:•.:{.},rx.\::.;{::i•.L}v:: •• ..,.. ..;...,.... .:.Y...:v ..,A...... ; {{•:{...pi;•}}Y..:p, .- xvww{y ad>::a-in:rz�. ±::}ra y.:.:::af.:.,saYd::<stree.f§031�:. ,......:::T::_:-;;:: ,-.;:.::.a....:..:. :::::;.. .:;. :•..:.::.,.: .::.'.:{ k ...... /YY/••��{( ,.ya. .,•:..p...�}ghwa. :s::f;::T::��'�3��ys::f <::���;d�. :::<��....oe w,.::v............v.....\•.p.•.T!.}.:T•:}.\ `h`n....v................::.{{i,...,............r.nv ,........-a...r..vN1ti•Y :.A,.n.....v..v............T:.v...:..............:...:....iv-::.....................::41•:Ii�}::::U .aga: €ttna:>;>:avttreet-:>silrmce:�::{{;:{.}...::;;.T:{�lt�:��>�sarfac�`sof>�:�:::a�• :: �st:•e :,v:uaaa»,<i<J :i; <;{i:;t -'{:<vnriii:< <�fiu ,: ;�i4:G:A {?,:.,-{.�}}}�..w:..:�;a..�.::!?{...�,."�::r:,,�.,�,..rrrrrrt{t{;{.::{!;;t.>,..±,:.:,.�:�.wtrr:.vtp:p:{;{:"<.:{;.>„-:.::.�p;,{,..;}}:p.::"t...:t{p:...>:t.::;-}::{.:�' {?{{p.�:!!.±}:{:<{{;{{.:«.>:.w;.>..}---{{�{?;.�..::.:�! street::ia ;:411a'1YMM�:.�,ti;out.,. .,.or.: d: sturbec «<:..: <` a`. •}T}Y--:-3}:Ni-T:{•:Avhi}h•<T"'a}:.Ya}•:}. .ri.aw.•VN}U\::,T':•:�•!.,,.. .vTJS�`v•v :;•n-i�.��.'n'i::...,...p.:;'{'•;,,T:a}' x.r::p}}T}:::C3..._x•}:•}}Tw<{;p>:w:pT:Tr�aa;,::<-:{,xxas.:�....:.:• :h..�,-.,.............,,.....:}p ::a t•}:}r tia:� ........... �: :........: ,.:........Y. .. ,.V.....!R: N±1M..,, :....:...:Y} ..a:;.±»:•}}: TY}±. ±a±±TY;±±......{.A Bons-ruct n }'::>lo.941ta nzn ;,:mo "era' .: n. >:=::: �:zs:4. >:<::oxtendu.n :..<;;:repog14 n. -,tx.;:..:. ': .:.'i :..":• V.. •.!}. ..;.:- ....:...Y.ti.r.,.Y:. .. :.......: ':J:n..n.:.Y;;.......;.,.:..:.... :...h•:i:+!?i,}r{{:::�}.:.. r}yrie}:::•.a'!%v.:{•ti ro :I.ac n : ;:<::#i:!:ge .a.M >MgV S.::ste : r :.thr��V;:ttt:Ar tgAg e:::ta:<the::: :t:.;: �.?,.:.a,-.a.:A„a,,a:.9•.:{�.,..:.a,-.a{„•.aa,.:F}{.-:.::::::. g:aa,-.�.a ....Y.:::...::.::.:.:::..::..:....:.......... P.:..::::.:..:::: ::.:.:.... .:::...:::..:.:.:K,a.....:::.:..r..,..,... ....., \ {r:�--,._,,.,.��p•_�:. ;.:.;p: {.g•x• ....,. ... .. .,. •::.. ,:-Y;:;{{;::-.:;•:_-: .f• -.,}}.: :}xa:;u{:-•p:;:•-±:;wti;;:; -x.;!.}Y•:-'<{{,!.::{u;:...;;.»s{cc.:{iix{......\::?�c, .<:`;::-�t�::;:> '': ::5:; ±:;.:. :..-:�:::}"-�.::fir!:::: .' ;;Sr, car,.:: ..-...:::.:des:z. atec <re .resentatI: e: :::>::<::< f<:»the.:::oit .:T::}ar.,:{{>3ts.::}Toles pates ...,a;ry.TTT:•}+±;?•i±}:4,;.T:.},±}:::}•:.}}:'a}}Yn±a,}}±>}}•.,}±}:-Y:pvy}• ;; ,.»ti.}:.,..•p};.;{: .;ri :.-.aT}•i-Y}y}v: . ..av:•»v•»v .,v•::•v»::vvv.:Kx..,.. ..,v.,vn•••»:»a»a»,»v » re tes gagglg .... . .......cxf......:the.....o a.:O <<> that gg0..<>;::>...: ......,rise�3:<:>s�..u :,>„ A - 7 - 74 - 7 disturbance of a paved street surface could not be _timely satisfactorily repaired or restored, the City,stay require Company's proposed°:.work `to'. be performed: :by . ;tunnelling': under.`:sued>':paved surfacather than°:by>'cutting Same: :d Restoration ;<:>:::`::The.. <:surface:;..of:::•an s,treet;:;`:d sturbe:a i:- ::.......:.....::.v..:..vi}'....{-:::.. ;.....-,.--,. .:::.:�:.. .. ..-..,,.. .:::...::::•'-tr�.•:a;'.;-:}::;:r:.-V.-:<.:Y<::i;�'t<i.. ..<;i.:.:i•v:-Yj':8::a...::iA Com an <:>:::>� n:;:::<la in -:..tob.n:struct'in.``,»:maintaining.-:: _operat :ngr;>;>:<us .ng's$ extending;:,:;;removing,.:<,.repl,ac ng,:; or:<:repaIring?.;its.:::System,:_shall v ie ....::.:.v::.::.::::::::::...::::�::.:::::::::.:•::::-::v:n:•:•:•.._.::::.:::,•:::::::,v-:• ::.::.-.:::•::.:.n:•::;:::•::::...::�:..:::::...:.-.�.-:.:_::::.:,.::::;;::::. :..:•. .::Y:•i::^-:-i}iiiS=.Y... ..:..::.}':9vYi:<•:.}::!:�•.},,,:• rer. ..._:.}'.:..:Y... P.::..Y:... ... ::Y..::. ............................::.,.,...,-..,«.,»a„�.a.�r e::: :::: o<:; .as:<:> ood :>ta<::<::::con..dzt.ion:.><>;as:::�laef:ortitOte at>:�:: ts::<,::. ost:::;::':and:�>:;:: en.s.. - :::.::t...::::::......:::::: ...:.... .. �.--:.,:,;,.::;•.::..-.,,-., a,..,::, a: , :•-.,a•...,-:--.5,:•:•-...�-:,�..,•<.;;•:..•:,.„aw}•-:s}}}:::v::.,v.V:v..:::v::::--v:::4:..:»..y :y-:•:..::.•.,; - ...}ar.,x commence�ttena-:<.;::.;:of:;:>::;:_th .:w .r .....a.:.: ...::.�.......z.:....a_....... . ......::.:Y........................::...:..:.xn.:::::::::.-:::.....n.........,:.:.::...::...::.-:::..:::.::::::•::.......,.............................................:..... ..:.......r::.i.i'�':+fii'i:�`}4i:.•:h}iY.f:•i:.:•iiif:i"N.•iiv ...:.:..:..[:..... ....:... ..n.:...:...::•::.-: :::.,. -::.::. ... ....::.:v:::......:nv::.:. .:..:i..... ...::•:: •.:::.x^ii:%:..}...:: .:.:;::•::.i±l :isi :!} . :iii::if. i�:::i}•:::�iiiiv.}}:•:5•.: ;: o .. ' c:.:a:l:< gi;4::whozu>::>v:iu h: sat:�a:factaon««:o.€:.;.she:>;:C�a >�: <::>:o.r:<:::::a.f:::>::>an : :::>:C�t ..._.. -ff..� i.. .: duties-:::>have<::be.en>:::or>::ma :::>::be::':;de'le. ated:::.>;<<:for:::>:::o:ne.::year<<:-from:Vge:<date <:.:-�:atiiii<`.:g_•::,::.,.,....ii.+•..r y:..:nF;:v}}y;p:�:::..::;'<:..::..;'.;;..�-.:>:.:.:;;>::::.;. .},.y...:y::-a;}:,:;:.:::'.:.}«.y.y::<::;::.::i.:::.::'<..::.;�:::.:'•..;;.: ...:•.:�::.:....:..:..::.:.:,..,>i:,}'v':;;;.�::<::..:<.>•.•.:�}-.:•:::.-.,..,.:<;,y of: com l;etion :;:of_: such :restoration.:;;:work <:: >'No ::street sha°u <>;ti e :::g:.v::::ryy:::::-:,:';>:>::::..:;}....,:.F'.>:::..,:-}SyS::<-}>,.;;;:;:.,'::}..r:q>;;,.,•:•n:.}?-a,•rini:^Si>i}}::••: ,::;....:;:;:-<:,;::<:.,,,:::•>':•}Y:}:i•.;:::::,.::<•,;::.;::.::^•-}:':};;Y:g'Y?`Y<.5?}}:<•}••:is:.?;}:•;:;:..:<:..�<:,::::;::?;:«.:<::.<. encumbered:<;:>b ::>::construction�:<.'maintenance>::.>•remova:l:o: �<;restorat:ion:,< o re a: r>work:<:b ::»:::C.om an >:>:for<:a::::>:>lon er:>::: e.rrod than;:<:sha:Vl<><>be neces:sa. ...::._::..v::::.::v:::::.v::.:v:..,::•:::.::.�::,:v::--::.v.v:::::::.v:.v.•::::::::.:v::::...:::.:::::::..::.v::::.,...:-:•:::.v:::::::::::::.:.:::::,:v:.:v:::::.,.:::..::.v:...:.::,:v:•::::-•.: :.._;.:.:}:::.,-.,:--.:.:;.}:.i;•.:•55::,:•+:a'?••,:a .......}}Y........: ......::. .:.::!:i•}:... .: .::::..: ..... ..}}}:!h:;;-:i-}:. :}:.}Y..}i:.Y,;.....;•}::... .i....::'f::.....:w.;..:.h:...-.::<;:i....': :i:-::: ..:...::':::::..:Y~. ::i�::::•. :•i^.:{ as nta:inin :stre:ets. after such;:;.::excavations::::::::or re airs; ;:hau been ..�:'...:{.:.:}•.ii:::•:?}:4i.•-.,..:-:-}:•::::•i:i'-'Y1:•;"-}:vi:i}ii:-'.:.•i..:...::-'!-i:•i::::::;i:•Y.!i•}X:i;S}i"•v'lam}::;ik-}55:;.-r.'ui+:.....,,..}:<-::-:}'.:::.*.:v:::::.}::.'-:..::`::?}'::....._.::.;::-;...:'}iii}?:i::.}r:•}:i?::Y::}'+:.:�:.i}5:.}:^}5i?:?•5"'•%•}}: glil . _ la. >:<�hav 1 e>::>:> :i .- :. . :- t-:: <_ .. ; er;<:;:::..oti c :>»-=tc mad.e���; >the:;< C�a <:: :aha. ,::.: e..,_th ......r.�.. ht:.:�zthcau.. ..:.furth....r.::.:n �. .�....::. . v:::.vv.}�S:.S:::is{4}..... ................,.., ..........: :k,-m:i.}}'::..:«:•:v:'Ln:v:. .. .'F..:•i::.i}.:i•}:::... <<:J:':fir{0;.5,'.':}.:.i}}yw�i5%Y.x Yifi:-:e<st • :e�::>::or<>:<>914A'Ir=>`the5}}isa e::.:5:an <; e:<::>:C n ::<:�:>:>t ;;:<<: a ;>::>::><: =e.......or....::.........::.:::...r....... ...:... .,..... .....-...m....:..-,.. d:..;::to: ire;. �r gm a. o..::.: ... reasonab e<<:cot of :such`::;:restoration :<or :;re pair. (b) The Company's system, poles, wires and appurtenances facilities shall endanger or interfere with the lives of persons, or interfere with any improvements the City may deem proper to make —® ft-eccs—ri 1'y hi - er---or obstruct—the-free.—=s-e—e-f the streets, alleys, bridges, casements or public property, and shall - 8 - be In complianee with all National Electric Code clearance requi-remanter (c) The Company may but shall not be required to extend ita current cable facilities. (d) All transmission and distribution structures, lines and equipment erected by the Company within thc. City shall be so located as to cause minimum interference with the proper usc of ctreets, alleys and other public ways and places, and to cause vih rights of reasonable convenience of property owncrs-whe-ad-j-e-i-n-any-e-f-t-he-s-a-i-d-s-tt-eet-sea-l-eys-er-ether public ways and places. (e) In case of any disturbance of pavement, sidewalk, driveway or other surfacing, the Company shall, at its own cost and expense and in a manner approved by the City, replace and restore all paving, sidewalk, driveway or surface of any street or alley disturbed in as good condition as before said work was commenced considering the nature of the work. X4(f)PelciCitiOn.': In the event that at any time during the period of this Franchise the City shall lawfully elect to alter or change the grade of any street, alley or other public way, the Company upon reasonable notice by the City, shall remove, relay and relocate its poles, wires, cables, underground conduits, manholes and other fixtures at its own expense. a(g)Pla'c'ement'515f'Flitigi The Company shall not place poles or other fixtures where the same will interfere with any properly located gas, electric or telephone fixture, water hydrant or main, and all such poles or other fixtures placed in any street - 9 - 7a-7 shall be placed at the outer edge of the sidewalk and inside the curb line, and those placed in alleys shall be placed close to the line of the lot abutting on said alley, and then in such manner as not to interfere with the usual traffic on said streets, alleys and public ways. K t `' h Temporary Removal of Wire for Buildincr Moving. T h e Company shall, on the request of any person holding a building moving permit, issued by the City, temporarily raise or lower its wires to permit the moving of buildings. The expense of such temporary removal, raising or lowering of wires shall be paid by the person holding the permit, and the Company shall have the authority to require such payment in advance. The Company shall be given not less than 5 business days ' advance notice to arrange for such temporary wire changes. 1'rees;4 The Company shall have the authority to trim trees upon and overhanging. streets, alleys, sidewalks and public places of the City so as to prevent the branches of such trees from coming in contact with the wires and cables of the Company. ?t{ ::<_«:::: ens ibri > f<::<: e r C e._.:.<::>:=:>'<:' e::.:c an :.., . .« ut. : l` h'Titttt�tii�iC-:t^ 'tii\Jh1`(2Si:1Gt^:�tK""':\J:Ki•T>:tii. ttttiLi�KC�•:ii:Ki��•C�'iiL:i{SL0.'C:ACii.\titttie't\1\`ttJ�tt7tGJY.•:V.\t4 �'4f'' xqt4i::C:!it!tM{:ie:v.•vv.-; �..�.::'•:i.;iw{rtaiw.vti{-.�.vrwx••:.1�v.Y?:t:v't-YC�!:!tv'w:nvwiviww+VM:yr{krx{inv.M:. ...f^w^':-ft•-:xY!-'w;ti:{Jvn.{irvvwr <nvM•..:...^Y.?^I+nwr.:::-.v. g.t.e . Wired to extend `mot �c .1 rabX : a 33 . yes } n y>�se: r ems. Ji:± tiiii:N:Y:•T.N�}:ttiJXJ:tA:ii ti:k'i•:iiriv']:•:+ii•.i:1\JiiJCtii:}1Cbt V:th1}.4J:SwJiv'NT]JvitJ:J}iwiw3:aliu.::Ji:J"iifN.:\\•:\�iBiV}ikbih\\`it3:vii]C4::`ii]:iJN.ii}:JkJ\ht]iiJii':\•iYi:AlnYliv tiivKJriiiJiiJ.h:.U.".i:-iir SECTION 11: Line Extension. Where the Company elects to extend its cable facilities, Company shall extend service to new subscribers, at the normal installation charge and monthly rate for customers of that classification, under the following terms and conditions: (a) Where the new subscriber, or nearest subscriber of a - 10 - 7¢-/O i group of new subscribers is located within 500 feet of existing trunk cable; or (b) Where the number of homes to be passed by such new extension cable plant exceeds or equals 50 homes per mile of such new extension cable plant. (c) In the event the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) are not met, the installation cost per subscriber shall be determined as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. SECTION 12: Compliance with Standards. All facilities and equipment of Company shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the requirements and specifications of the National Electrical Safety Code and such applicable ordinances and regulations set forth by the City and/or any other local, state or federal agencies. SECTION 13: Company Rules and Regulations. The Company shall have the authority to promulgate such rules, regulations, terms and conditions governing the conduct of its business as shall be reasonably necessary to enable the Company to exercise its rights and perform its obligations under this Franchise, and to assure uninterrupted service to each and all of its customers. However, such rules, regulations, terms and conditions shall not be in conflict with the provisions hereof or of federal and state laws. SECTION 14: Procedures. The Company shall be a party to any proceeding in which its rights, privileges or interests would be affected and shall be fully entitled to due process rights. SECTION 15: Approval of Transfer. The Company shall not - 11 74-// sell or transfer its System to another, nor transfer any rights under this Franchise to another without written approval by the City provided that such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld if the vendee, assignee or lessee has filed with the appropriate official of the City an instrument duly executed, reciting the fact of such sale, assignment or lease, accepting the terms of this Franchise and agreeing to perform all conditions thereof. SECTION 16: Compliance with FCC Rules and Regulations. The Company shall, at all times, comply with the rules and regulations governing Cable Television operations promulgated by the FCC. This shall include adherence by the Company to FCC rules regarding technical and engineering specifications involved in the construction of the System and signal carriage therein. ..........4:•:4:.};•:4i}:;•;•r:.:: .::: i:.}:... ::?4:....}Y..::i.(?.v:-^:i??:.:i?ii?vivl. .::.'4.:.:::... .: :.L,vrx SECTION 17 : l corp:ort ifiNbt»:State <::La r: ::<:: 'e`c eral ' w'KK a •......:.:... ......}>:;"}:}a„•..:..,a::a+:.,,,;•,�n....,.,•.,•:n,:,•: :;.;..•,a}c4:.}>} }:.n}..::•�:•}}:.,�.,,::. .,,;.;}}, ,a;}?c•.},•.Y4:x4:.: :a,,:•:a}}:.:::: �n.}:!eo}},;:ate-.aa .v,,,:.,.}}:.,..}._,,,.}:, aaar...Mcs �`ddgRa es::and...Rec lat ons :>:>��;:: . re ggg9 s gkitf gtgtti e a .-'--.... ..:::�rr::,:PE,r.:.....,..a;:,.}}:::;:�:?:>}}{:;.:.............:.:.......,v.......:rrr.....n...:.n...:.:rrrrr:A�....r�,,. :::.x:...a:vm:.�..:n.::.-:nw....:::n..::.::..�:v�,:..v.,..�.v::.,.:.}:?.;>-..}>:?.};.:::...:,,.�..:r.:..:...:,.....,:..,.:..nv:k..:.,.,w::..A..,-4}vr.>,Y . }: ;:::<::> e<:>; nsst.e _ ::<:r;. •; :::::>: t te�>:;::> w::::::}:<:>": 'ederal::: :> :aw>�;<:>:<::a :::x<:E 3ntenc�e...�.;:.:�Q.�}:�i....::... o ........__:.......�?...::.::�aa�...::::.s. .a. .....�.. .:f. w.•:r..•.yr.nw:;rrv::rxn....Ynvrxn•:rn•: : :•:••. y..:r:::: v::n. : : n•v:::• ........::x:::::.n...:::.v:r.•{{?•:?:• rules.<;:..anc .}>}:re. 1.ation <:>::l:f<::;:::stat:e:>::::: ;>::fdera.I...3ai+r... r:::2;: .:>r . e.. ,.:: nd .,,.:nn.:,:.:., ...a,...::.,,,,.n:..,,,,,-.x„:::.:::..::.:.r::.,,.,-.Y.,:::..,..�4.n,-::::.�:r:::._:..::..�.,»..Y.,.:::n:-.,.::.:: ::::.�..:.:,,..,:.:::::...,:..:,.:::::.,.:.::.;::::.;: :.:.,..::......:._::n..,�::.,...:.:,v::.,..:;:<;.",:.---}':' : <:::: hor :ze: ;_;a... ;:::::r:�:<:. ;.. ., :»::;«o. >; :�L " 44.1•<0. >.:::: :t an<::::<0 �::NC }�..,...r..r ::nh::>,.::::rr}::} i :rrrr:..:::::r::::.,.::, :::..r.....:...::..:.nr.......::�:.}:> }.:::::r:.:::: :r: <;:::>;:;»:.....r....r.:.::::::.::•-.::.. .r.. .,,,r,,,,:r..,,,,,onnv.,w.,,,,,,,-.:nt,,,,..�•:.c4::?4:,.n,........,.,,r...,...:.n....n...... ...... ..... :..:•-•:n.:::w:u.v:••n::: :•:.. ..:: n:::n.... ..... ...,.:.........:..::•::. ..r:::::::::r:.v:-:.: rrr:::::�,.,•:--:::..•:::r:.:r:::::::••n•::::x::::•::::w::::::•:•::::r::::::::::n...:::rr-•:r2..:•.xv...wrivr: ghat:< }0b.:< t:::::<Ahal>l<: raise:>:::bh :n.;a .tI:c� z:::>: o::::>::: ..lenient:_ :tge::igk M ::S'.:i}ti:n�".."{-ii:ii:L.}}i:iti-:.}:;.k;.:;{•}:v ,1:iis4i}::i::2iiii:_:.}:;;s:;�.i:.:{.:_:}i:;.i}}::.i,:4ii}i:.i}iii:............:}:.:::.}is4:.isJ}:{4}:4:.}:;{.}:i:....:.....e...........:ii::-i:;.is::i::.:.n....n:..............v.n,....,,,..,,,v: dWii: so<:<:auth'o�i��d�� ..::.r:.:r.nrrr.::.A._:..,.....: :.:...,..,.rr..:. }x;>:>: ....::.n..n... ..:..r:::nyr.._, .,....... . ............ :.::. .... ..v::r.' ..4�•:4y•:vvv-,}Y.}}}yir�:f:-v.:i'r..:.:va}::•.}:,:..w w:-.:...x v, ....v.:......ry:?4-:n.. }}i:%"::}.:v. .n\:......... .... ..... :..T�;:.�:'f.;^:?;.:r. }....:.. .:isS:}:?.i}:;???::i}}:4:i.i:•n._:.::};L.::r ?::}:".i}i}}:v".}?i:-:�.ic.:.i:Y.:iy..�}Y,.':?;now rcw�n e ....................... {..'?.:ir,;;' :: '?S{t.... IX;iL}:{;v..'r{{h:::' •._:Si•}i. -:{wnv.,,v':.:F4ii :•:ii{:tivn:.::..::. .,vvv:n:v:.v;vv:vv. ,w..........v ....}}:�i::4::v.............v.... ..v SECThdrt''r18` Publication Costs. The Company shall assume the costs of the publication of- this Franchise as such publication is required by law. A bill for publication costs shall be - 12 - 7 /2 presented to the Company by the appropriate City officials upon the Company' s filing of its acceptance of this Franchise and the publication costs shall be paid at that time by the Company. SECT/ON``:19 Activities Prohibited. The Company shall not allow its cable or other operations to interfere with television reception of persons not served by the Company. SECTPA<2`Q `€>>< "<Severabi1 tv If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. EC .: �ON:::> -::r::<:<:::>:< Ef . :...TI.... :..Z.1.•..,............- fect� �ve��>Date _:>r :><::: <:::<'`�is:Ord>>r�an:Ge: :sslia��:<�� e ef'fe t...a '::.::a ::<::;.:'<ts>.}::: o ::::. .:::.,.::....:.};::............,...::...-:::;:..:....:.:...:.. . . . .:.. . ... -.. :.._:.: :ft.. .r...:.i.. ,ad.... t :on.::b >:>the Z.t. >:<;Coun. l:::<:::�re4e : ;P=<:: is ; gEgi tirZe::�: v�:n'.:.:r:}}}:^....}}ty}...,:Y.:ryv?i^•vi}}v}:+vv.}vd:::i}yJ•:i:•.}}var-'.}}?.Y}}}:?v:•}}:::::.::<.:?�h.}•}:+.: :n.:::. nv.}:{•i}::.:::::�:�y,•:.v..ww-•:- x:/n.: -,•1....; a4:.'lH. :M:]9Mga. vi._: ,.<:: ...:...:...:...: .::<>.:: •¢?�•..{41Cr. .t-:}}:•}'r'.^r,...f-.....:C�Zi.n:• ::?�::•. .`Ma ...'�{ri}Y>. 4 04:#0<§46#en n: ::<: b.e::WO '.an.:-:}}:has:•}}> :'. .::'.'ed-•}}:a -' ::i::.} usu:::a nee:.....:.;:... ::... r:g:::::::::.:.::..:..:..:.::.:::.F.:.:::Y:;:.::..:..:..:.::;cab:�a�.n;...:...}rv...:�.::..:.::::....::..}:vv:xvn n•.,{S i:U'an:vh.t.a:{A:!i;•:A;;:i::SSA•:S;S?<v?'\v.Lii:iii:;;;Si:S.t...n.......nn..hv.v.vv.:.a. ....S.n..n...n...nx.+n:viv:fv::a:vi..xxvv{v..{,S.v..xxvvxv..avx.n,r.,<....x,,.w;;�i{i«;;{di{vi<i .....r:.n:it?M•}:.X•xit?:::{"{{.::'}Xi.:{?::,.. r'.Y?:t:<::;:••}::.. ..�:.;;riiv-::.:::y::•S:::::.::::::::•r•w:w:-:: : ::::•:•--':•:r:.:.•r.::•r... r.:...::::rr..: :......::rr..........vw:•:w.,. ...v,. .: :::. � ::: : tint}..: .,6 tee. . :red: b:::»Milt::Ord anc.e::':»>:ar�EAggcuti o :>::o ::: 'e'::ae a .:':.a . :.e=:}:. :.;:: ; ......rv....1.n.anv..rnv.J.m..Y.•..xvv.....wn..nnvvn r............,.....:w ::r::............n...............-..:..:.nvnv : ::::::.vx:9}.,;•.•:::.w::.-.-e:.::::nvh4ii:J:uv:�vriAN::rn�X�:;.::r::mA{J}:SC;O:•:Mr\1 git#044100kNO04#2g DE IT FURTIIER ORDAINED that this Ordinancc take effect after the data it shall havc bccn pa33cd by the appropriate authoritative body, and bccomc cffcctivc a3 othcrwi3e provided by law. ATTEST: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BY: City Clerk Mayor Date: - 13 - • ACCEVTAltdtrdkAPRANCEinE - -•-- niar14:4M„ afa5WS-..grabeeStgV.fthlrgArt*W.E.fia."ffeasPraln:•?:trigarfferiWilegfignEget.Wdri •Cji15.67156iiii.CPSVL, Migti% ---• regnar"rifig›....1%WilfgraffgRafiaraaii- mzeireffen. amiosamblitnathiT?matiNsmatt-dv ii-framitozzaimm.t.wm,sunommamwm:.pmm.,..aman..... • slake\Cable.ord(5/27/93) • , . • • - 14 - City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 9, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 585 - TREE PRESERVATION Attached you will find the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585 for your consideration. On May 18 , 1993 the Council recommended tabling the first reading of this ordinance to allow the city attorney time for review. On June 1, 1993 the Council approved the first reading of this ordinance with a 5-0 vote. Please place this on the Council agenda for their consideration. GL/gh Attachment : Tree Preservation Ordinance C:\GLORIA\WPFILES\PLANNER\TRE_PRES.JUN • lB- I TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE NO. 585 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ESTABLISHING CRITERIA AND REGULATIONS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MATURE TREES; PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR PERMIT REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING A REVIEW PROCESS; PROVIDING FOR TREE PROTECTION AND REPLACEMENT; PROVIDING FOR RESTRICTIONS ON PRUNING AND PLANTING OF TREES; PROVIDING ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFE VE DATE. T-.. r-x.� ome rule City the Cit y acting under its charter adopted by* t e electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, trees are a valuable amenity to the urban environment and serve to create greater human comfort by providing shade, cooling the air and otherwise tempering the effect of summer heat, thereby reducing the requirements for air conditioning and the subsequent depletion of scarce energy resources; and WHEREAS, trees purify the air by filtering pollutants and dust and release oxygen into the air; and WHEREAS, trees protect land and structures by reducing run-off, binding soil and minimizing flood damage; and WHEREAS, trees are known to add dollar value to residential and commercial property and to increase income levels and tax revenues by attracting new business, industry and residents through improving a city' s image; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to actively participate in the "Tree City U.S.A. " program and the "Keep Southlake Beautiful" , program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has determined that tree preservation is necessary to adequately protect the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE 1 .0 PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this ordinance is to encourage the preservation of mature trees and natural areas, to preserve protected trees during construction and to control the removal of protected trees when necessary. It is the intent of this ordinance to achieve the following: - Prohibit the indiscriminate clearing of property. - Protect and increase the value of residential and commercial properties within the City. - Maintain and enhance a positive image for the attraction of new business enterprises to the City. - Protect healthy quality trees and, promote the natural ecological environmental and aesthetic qualities of the City. 2 . 0 DEFINITIONS 2.1 GENERAL RULES: For the purpose of this ordinance, the following rules shall be applied in constructing, interpreting or otherwise defining the terms and provisions hereof: a. Words used in the present tense shall include the future, words used in the singular number shall include the plural number and words used in the plural shall include the singular. b. The word "shall" is mandatory and the word "may" is permissive. 2 .2 DEFINITIONS: For the purpose of this ordinance, certain words or terms applicable hereto are defined as hereinafter provided. Words and terms used in this ordinance, but not defined in this ordinance shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance or other ordinances of the City. Words and terms defined in two ordinances shall be read in harmony unless there exists an irreconcilable conflict in which case the definition contained in this ordinance shall control. BUILDABLE AREA: That portion of a building site exclusive of the required yard areas on which a structure or building improvements may be erected and including the actual structure, driveway, parking lot, pool and other construction as shown on a site plan. BUILDING PAD: The actual foundation area of a building and a reasonable area around the foundation necessary for construction and grade transitions. ?8 -J CRITICAL ROOT ZONE: The area of undisturbed natural soil around a tree defined by a concentric circle with a radius equal to the distance from the trunk to the outermost portion of the dripline. (See Appendix 'D' . ) CUT/FILL: Areas where the natural ground level has been excavated (cut) to a depth of 4" or greater or earth deposited (fill) to a depth of 4" or greater. DRIP LINE: A vertical line run through the outermost portion of the canopy of a tree and extending to the ground. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION: A delineation on the graphic exhibit which shows the boundary of the area within which all construction activity will occur. MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC tDOMAIN PROPERTY: Examples of this would include City Hall, public parks, Corps of Engineers property, State of Texas R.O.W. , library, fire stations, water tower sites or similar properties. PROTECTIVE FENCING: Snow fencing, chain link fence, barbed wire fence, orange vinyl construction fencing or other similar fencing with a four foot (4' ) approximate height. TREE: Any self-supporting woody perennial plant which will attain a trunk diameter of three (3) inches or more when measured at a point four and one-half feet (4.5' ) above ground level and normally an overall height of at least twenty (20) feet at maturity, usually with one (1) main stem or trunk and many branches. It may appear to have several stems or trunks as in several varieties of oaks. TREE, MARGINAL: A tree which the City has determined may or may not be worthy of:preservation depending on the individual characteristics of the tree. (See Appendix 'A' . ) TREE, PROTECTED: A specimen tree identified as a 'quality' tree by the City or a specimen tree in the 'marginal' category which the Landscape Administrator has determined should be saved due to individual characteristics of the tree. TREE PROTECTION AND REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS: Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8 of this ordinance. TREE, QUALITY: A tree which the City has determined typically has significant positive characteristics worthy of preservation. (See Appendix) TREE, SPECIMEN: A tree which has a diameter of 8" (Approx. 25" circumference) or greater at breast height, four and one-half feet (4 .5' ) above the ground. The diameter of a multi-trunk tree shall be determined by adding the total diameter of the largest trunk to 1/2 the diameter of each additional trunk. (Appendix 'E' . ) TREE BOARD: Shall mean the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3 . 0 TREE-REMOVAL PERMIT REQUIRED 3 . 1 GENERAL: No person, directly or indirectly, shall cut down, destroy, remove or move, or effectively destroy through damaging, any protected tree situated on property regulated by this ordinance without first obtaining a tree-removal permit unless otherwise specified in this ordinance. 3 .2 MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC DOMAIN PROPERTY: All municipal or public domain property shall be subject to the requirements for tree protection and replacement specified herein. a. Permit Requirements: A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree, however protected trees to be removed must be shown on construction plans approved by the Landscape Administrator. 3 .3 EXISTING R.O.W. AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS: All construction and maintenance activity within public R.O.W. or easements shall be subject to the requirements for tree protection and replacement specified herein. a. City Projects : The City shall be subject to the requirements for tree protection and replacement specified herein on all projects. 1. Permit. Requirements: A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree, however protected trees to be removed must be shown on construction plans approved by the Landscape Administrator. b. Franchise and Other Utility Companies: All utility company projects shall be subject to the requirements for tree protection and replacement specified herein. 1. Permit requirements: A tree-removal permit must be obtained prior to the removal of a protected tree. This permit must be accompanied by a site plan or construction plan meeting the graphic exhibit requirements specified herein. Pruning activities by a utility must comply with section 7 . Q7a-s 3 .4 NEW DEVELOPMENTS: All developments which have not submitted final construction plans as of the effective date of this ordinance shall be subject to the requirements for tree protection and replacement specified herein. a. Residential Subdivisions: All area within public R.O.W. , utility easements or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat and areas designated as cut/fill on the master drainage construction plan approved by the Landscape Administrator shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements specified herein. All other area shall be subject to these requirements. 1. Permit Requirements: A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within said R.O.W. or easements, however a permit must be obtained prior to the removal of any other protected tree on the property. b. Non-Residential Developments: All area within public R.O.W. , public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, and the fire lanes, parking areas and area within 12' of the building foundation as shown on an approved Site Plan shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements specified herein. All other areas shall be subject to these requirements. ' 1. Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within an area noted in 3 .4-b above, however a permit must be obtained prior to the removal of any other protected tree on the property. 3 . 5 PRIVATE PROPERTY: a. Agricultural : Property zoned 'AG' agricultural and being actively used for agricultural purposes shall be exempt from the requirements specified herein. b. Homeowners: The owner of a residence who uses the residence as his' homestead shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements of this ordinance as it pertains to that residential property. c. Builders/Contractors : All builders who have not submitted a request for a building permit as of the effective date of this ordinance are subject to the requirements herein. All area within the driveway , sidewalks, patios, septic tank and lateral lines, parking area, pool and associated deck area and area within 12' of the building foundation as shown on an approved plot plan shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements of this ordinance. All other areas of the lot shall be subject to the these requirements. 1 . Permit Requirements: A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within the area noted in 3 .5-c above, however a permit must be obtained prior to` the removal of any other protected tree on the property. 3 . 6 EXCEPTIONS: A tree removal permit and tree protection and replacement requirements shall not be required under any of the following circumstances. a. Damaged/Diseased Trees: The tree is dead, diseased, damaged beyond the point of recovery, or in danger of falling as determined by the Landscape Administrator. This would include removal of a diseased tree by the city to reduce the chance of spreading the disease to adjacent healthy trees. b. Public Safety: The tree endangers the public health, welfare or safety and immediate removal is required. c. Utility Service Interruption: The tree has disrupted a public utility service due to a tornado, storm, flood or other act of God. Removal shall be limited to the portion of the tree reasonably necessary to reestablish and maintain reliable utility service. d. Business Interests: The following- business ventures shall be exempt from the requirements specified herein as follows . 1. Landscape Nursery: All licensed plant or tree nurseries shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements and from the tree-removal permit requirements only in relation to those trees planted and growing on the premises of said licensee which are so planted and growing for the sale or intended sale to the general public in the ordinary course of said licensee' s business . rib-7 2 . Golf Course: Golf courses shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements and from the tree removal permit requirement for removal of protected trees within areas designated as tee boxes, fairways or greens. " All other areas shall be subject to these requirements . 3 . Quarries: All approved quarry operations shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements and from the tree removal permit requirements of this ordinance within the limits of the active operations. 4 . Other Business Interests: Other business interests may be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements and from the tree-removal permit requirements only when so stated in developer' s agreement or on a Concept Plan approved by the City Council. 4.0 PERMIT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS 4 .1 AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW: The Landscape Administrator shall be responsible for the review and approval of all requests for tree-removal permits submitted in accordance with the requirements specified herein. a. Deferrals: The Landscape Administrator may defer the approval of a tree removal permit to the Planning and Zoning Commission for any reason. All / - decisions made by the Commission shall be final. b. Appeals: Any decision made by the Landscape Administrator may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission. All decisions made by the Commission shall be final . 4 .2 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The Landscape Administrator shall establish administrative procedures necessary to facilitate the implementation and enforcement of this ordinance. a. Tree-Removal Permit : A request for a tree-removal permit must be submitted and approved prior to the removal of any protected tree in the City unless the tree is exempt under a provision of this ordinance. (See Appendix 'B' for example permit..) b. Fees : All tree-removal permits shall be accompanied by a check made payable to the City of Southlake in the amount specified by City Council . n/ / B-8 c. Graphic Exhibit : All requests for tree-removal permits must be accompanied by a graphic exhibit showing at least the following. These requirements may be modified by the Landscape Administrator as needed to administer this ordinance. Upon prior approval by the Landscape Administrator the graphic exhibit may be limited to only the applicable portion of the site. An aerial photograph may be allowed if it clearly meets these requirements. 1. Appropriate title (i.e. Tree Removal Permit Exhibit. ) 2 . Title block includes street address, lot and block, subdivision name, city and date of preparation. 3 . North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. 4 . Name, address and phone of owner and person preparing the exhibit if different. 5 . Location of all R.O.W. lines and public easements. 6 . Location of all buildings, structures, pools and other improvements intended on the lot. 7 . Areas of cut/fill and flow lines shown. 8 . Limits of construction line shown if applicable. 9 . Location of tree (s) to be removed is tied down with dimensions from two nearest property lines . 10 . Caliper and common name of tree to be removed. 11. Any required replacement trees shown with caliper size and common name of tree. d. Permit Expiration: Permits for tree removal issued in connection with a building permit or site plan shall be valid for the period of that building permit' s or site plan' s validity. Permit (s) for tree removal not issued in connection with a building permit or a site plan shall become void one hundred eighty (180) days after the issue date on the permit . 77a-9 4 .3 ACTION ON PERMIT APPLICATION: The Landscape Administrator or the Commission shall deny a tree-removal permit if it is determined that: a. Removal of the tree is not reasonably required in order to conduct anticipated activities; or b. A reasonable accommodation can be made to preserve the tree. 5. 0 TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS 5 .1 TREE REPLACEMENT: In the event that it is necessary to remove a protected tree as specified in 3 .0-3 .5 herein, the applicant may be required to replace the protected trees being removed with quality trees as defined herein or canopy trees as recommended in the Landscape Ordinance. A sufficient number of trees shall be planted to equal, in caliper, the diameter of the tree removed. Said replacement trees shall be a minimum of 3" caliper (at 1' above ground) and 7 feet in height when planted. At the time of review, the agent responsible for replacement, the time of replacement and the location of the new trees will be determined by the Landscape Administrator. The replacement trees shall be located on the subject site whenever possible, however if this is not feasible, the Landscape Administrator has the authority to allow the planting to take place on another property. Franchise. utility companies shall be exempt from this requirement. 6 . 0 TREE PROTECTION A major purpose of this ordinance is to protect all quality trees which are not required to be removed to allow approved construction to occur. The following procedures are required in the situations noted, however unique circumstances may be accommodated by the Landscape Administrator. 6 .1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS: All construction plans shall include the requirements noted in Appendix 'C' . 6 .2 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES: The following activities shall be prohibited within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree subject to the requirements of this ordinance. a. Material Storage: No materials intended for use in construction or waste materials accumulated due to excavation or demolition shall be placed within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree. b. Equipment Cleaning/Liquid Disposal : No equipment shall be cleaned or other liquids deposited or allowed to flow overland within the limits of the critical root zone of a protected tree. This would include paint, oil, solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar or similar materials. c. Tree Attachments : No signs, wires or other attachments, other than those of a protective nature shall be attached to any protected tree. d. Vehicular Traffic: No vehicular and/or construction equipment traffic or parking shall take place within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree other than on an existing street pavement. This restriction does not apply to single incident access within the critical root zone for purposes of clearing underbrush, establishing the building pad and associated lot grading, vehicular traffic necessary for routine utility maintenance or emergency restoration of utility service or routine mowing operations. e. Grade Changes : No grade changes in excess of 4" (cut or fill) shall be allowed within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator. f. Impervious Paving: No paving with asphalt, concrete or other impervious materials in a manner which may reasonably be expected to kill a tree shall be placed within the limits of the critical root zone of a protected tree except as otherwise allowed in this ordinance. 6 .3 PRESERVED TREE: A protected tree shall be considered to be preserved only if a minimum of 75% . of the critical root zone is maintained at undisturbed natural grade and no more than 25% of the canopy is removed due to building encroachment. 6 .4 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION: At the discretion of the Landscape Administrator, the following alternative procedures shall be followed on all types of construction projects (i.e. residential subdivisions, commercial, multi-family, industrial developments, residential builders and municipal/public) . a. Tree Flagging: All protected trees on the subject property within forty feet (40' ) of a construction area or surface improvements such as driveway, walks, etc. shall be flagged with bright fluorescent orange vinyl tape wrapped around the main trunk at a height of 4' or more such that the tape is very visible to workers operating construction equipment . This shall not include the flagging of all protected trees adjacent to R.O.W. within approved residential subdivisions during the construction of the roadway. 18- 11 b. Open Space Flagging: All trees or groups of trees within areas intended to be saved as open space shall be enclosed with fluorescent orange tape along all areas of possible access or intrusion by construction equipment. Tape shall be supported at a maximum of 25' intervals by wrapping trees or other approved methods. Single incident access for the purposes of clearing underbrush is allowed. c. Protective Fencing: In those situations where a protected tree is so close to the construction area that construction equipment will infringe on the root system, a protective fencing may be required between the tree and the construction activity. d. Bark Protection: In situations where a protected tree remains in the immediate area of intended construction, the tree shall be protected by enclosing the entire circumference of the tree with 2" x 4" lumber encircled with wire or other means that do not damage the tree. The intent here is to protect the bark of the tree against incidental contact by large construction equipment. 6 . 5 PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION .METHODS: a. Boring: Boring of utilities under protected trees may be required in certain circumstances. When required, the length of the bore shall be the width of the critical root zone at a minimum and shall be a minimum depth of 48" . In particular this requirement would typically pertain to franchise utility installations. b. Grade Change: In situations where the grade change within the critical root zone of a protected tree exceeds four inches (4") , the procedures noted in the City standard detail sheet shall be required. c. Trenching: All trenching where possible shall be designed to avoid trenching across the critical root zone of any protected tree. This shall not inhibit the placement of necessary underground services such as electric, phone, gas, etc. 1. Root Pruning: It is recommended that all roots 2" or larger in diameter which are exposed as a result of trenching or other excavation shall be cut off square with a sharp medium tooth saw and covered with pruning compound within 2 hours of initial exposure. 7 . 0 TREE PRUNING RESTRICTIONS 7 .1 GENERAL: No protected tree shall be pruned in a manner which significantly disfigures the tree or in a manner which would reasonably lead to the death of the tree. 7.2 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: All franchise utility companies shall be required to maintain at the City a set of pruning specifications (updated annually) to be followed by all pruning contractors working for the company within the City. Prior to beginning any pruning not requested by the owner of the tree, the contractor shall submit to the City an application for a pruning permit for approval. As allowed in section 3 . 6-c, utility companies may prune trees as necessary to re-establish disrupted electric service without obtaining a permit. 7 .3 ALLOWED PRUNING: The Landscape Administrator may approve pruning of a protected tree in cases where a protected tree must be pruned to remove branches broken during the course of construction, or where protected trees must be strategically pruned to allow construction of a structure. When allowed, all pruning shall be in accordance with approved Arboricultural techniques and the recommendations of Appendix 'G' . 7.4 REQUIRED PRUNING: The owners of all trees adjacent to public R.O.W. shall be required to maintain a minimum clearance of ten feet (10' ) above the traveled pavement or curb of a public street. The City shall also have the right to prune trees overhanging within Public R.O.W. as necessary to preserve the public safety. 8 . 0 TREE PLANTING RESTRICTIONS 8 .1 OVERHEAD LINES: Any required replacement trees shall not be planted within an area such that the mature canopy of the z. tree will interfere with overhead utility lines. 8 .2 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES: Any required replacement trees shall not be planted: within an area such that the mature root zone of the tree will interfere with underground public utility lines. No trees shall be planted within ten feet (10' ) of a fire hydrant. 9 .0 ENFORCEMENT 9 .1 DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT: No developer' s agreement shall be approved which does not state that all construction activities shall meet the requirements of the tree preservation ordinance. 9 .2 BUILDING PERMIT: No building permit shall be issued unless the applicant signs an application or permit request which states that all construction activities shall meet the requirements of the tree preservation ordinance. The Building Official shall make available to the applicant a copy of the tree preservation ordinance or a condensed summary of the relevant aspects pertaining to the type of permit requested. 1 7r3_/3 9 .3 ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS: No acceptance of public improvements shall be authorized until all fines for violations of this ordinance have been paid to the City or otherwise disposed of through the Municipal Court. 9 .4 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificate of Occupancy (C.O. ) shall be issued until all fines for violations of this ordinance have been paid to the City or otherwise disposed of through the Municipal Court. 10 . 0 VIOLATIONS Any person, firm, corporation, agent or employee thereof who violates any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction hereof shall be fined not to exceed Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($500.00) for each incident. The unlawful destruction or removal of each protected tree shall be considered a separate incident and each incident subjects the violator to the maximum penalty of $500.00 per tree. 11. 0 SEVERABILITY It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 12 . 0 CONFLICTING ORDINANCES This Ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City; and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any of such other ordinances except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, in such other ordinance or ordinances are hereby repealed. 13 . 0 SAVINGS CLAUSE All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any ordinances affecting the regulations for installation of landscaping improvements which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. '78 l� ' 14 . 0 PUBLICATIONS CLAUSE The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this . ordinance, as required by section 3 . 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. 15 . 0 EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 16 . 0 APPENDICES It is anticipated that the following appendices will be changed periodically by the Landscape Administrator in response to changes in the administration of this ordinance. `7,8-15 APPENDIX 'A' TREE SUMMARY The following is a summary of representative trees for each category of tree. QUALITY TREES Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes Pecan Carya illinoensis Pecan fruit, compound leaves Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Deciduous, 1"-2" dark green leaves Shumard Red Oak Quercus shumardii Deep pointed lobes in leaves Texas Red Oak Quercus texana Vertical multi-trunk shape Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1 1/2" dark green pointed leaves Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa Large acorn, leaf border at end Post Oak Quercuststellata Deep lobes, rounded tip on leaf Black Jack Oak Quercus marilandica Leathery 3"-7" leaf, no lobes Lacebark Elm Ulmus parvifolia Small dark serrated green leaves Chinese Pistache Pistacia chinensis 3" sickle leaflets, fall color Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Star shaped leaf Austrian Pine Pinus nigra Two needles Chinquapin Oak Quercus muhlenbergii Oblong 4"-6" serrated leaf Southern Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora Large evergreen Leaf, white flower Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum Feather-like foliage, fall color Caddo Maple Acer barbatum 'Caddo' Five-lobed leaf Texas Hickory Carya texana Five leaflets, 1"-2" nut MARGINAL TREES Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes Cottonwood Populus deltoides Deep fissures in bark, heart shape leaf Mesquite Prosopis glandulosa Lacy open foliage, 10" bean fruit American Elm Ulmus americana 'V' shaped main branching Slash Pine Pinus elliotti Tall cylindrical shape Honeylocust Gleditsia triacanthos Lacy foliage, thornless variety only Japanese Black Pine Pinus thunbergii Twisted growth, dark green needles Western Soapberry Sapindus drummondii 18" compound leaf, 1/2" clear fruit Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Native, pyramidal shape Deodar Cedar Cedrus deodara Large pyramidal evergreen OTHER TREES OF CONCERN Although the following trees do not typically obtain the protected 8" size, the City would like to recommend that protective care also be considered for these trees: Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes Redbud Cercis canadensis Purple/white flower in spring Mexican Plum Prunis mexicana White flower, exfoliating bark,thorns Possumhaw Holly Ilex decidua Showy orange/red fruit, deciduous Golden Raintree Koelrutaria paniculata Yellow flower, panicled fruit Yaupon Holly Ilex vomitoria Evergreen, light bark, red fruit Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana Glossy evergreen foliage, shrubby River Birch Betula nigra White flaky bark Eves Necklace Sophora affinis Dull green tear-dropped shape leaf 05/06/93 EXHIBIT 'B' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TREE-REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT NAME: LOT: BLOCK: . STREET ADDRESS: OWNER CONTRACTOR/BUILDER NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: I hereby certify that this application meets the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and further certify that all construction pertaining to this project shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Signed: Title: Date: ************************************************************************************** For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of this application and the application fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 19 Signed: Title: ************************************************************************************** Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Plan Applic. Appropriate title (i.e. Tree Removal Permit Exhibit) Title block includes street address, lot and block, subdivision name Title includes City and date of preparation North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity Name, address and phone of owner Name, address and phone of person preparing the exhibit Location of tree(s) to be removed is tied down with dimensions from two nearest property lines Location of all R.O.W. lines and public easements Location of buildings, structures, pools and other improvements Areas of cut/fill and flow lines Caliper and common name of tree(s) to be removed Any required replacement tree(s) shown with caliper size and common name of tree Limits of construction line shown Reason Tree Must be Removed: **************************************************************************************** Permit for tree removal approved the day of , 19 By: Title: Notes: APPENDIX ' C' CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS The following shall be required as a part of all construction plans submitted to the City when required by the Landscape Administrator. 1. A Tree Preservation Detail Sheet shall include the following at a minimum. a. The requirements of section 6 .2 - 6.4 shall be noted. b. A graphics legend to be used throughout the plans for the purposes of showing the following: Trees to be flagged, protective fencing, trees requiring bark protection, boring, areas of cut and fill impacting protected trees. c. Graphic tree exhibit showing t•he features of a tree to include the critical root zone, truck, canopy, drip line and method of caliper measurement. d. Graphic exhibits showing methods of protection to include snow fences, boarded skirts, etc. e. Graphic exhibits showing construction methods to include grade changes, boring, trenching etc. f. Graphic exhibit showing appropriate pruning practices. • 2 . All requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance shall be shown graphically on all applicable sheets within the construction plans. • '75 -18 • APPENDIX 'D' TREE EXHIBIT , ,,,-/--.\--%3 CP‘Nopi t aka A t 1141111)A1"111 101 --"14BL t • i 0:41.11W— lik' tit , TRUNK 1. '` DRIP LINE . ✓6 p G RAT IG D.L R ooT ZONE 1 V Zo' -co 0UTE1MosT 20' RD.p1us lil DRIP LINE coNOEKTRIG ciedL� I r .- isill~. - I/2 '11 Nsi CRITICAL ROOT ZONE: The area of undisturbed natural soil around a tree defined by a concentric circle with a radius equal to the distance from the trunk to the outermost portion of the dripline. DRIP LINE: A vertical line run through the outermost portion of the canopy of a tree and extending to the ground. ' /78-19 APPENDIX ' E' METHODS OF TREE MEASUREMENT is4,4..ssi .. Lin of Measurement Normal Line of Measurement ,„,„.„„„,„„„„„„ ,:::::::::::::•:: Actual Line of Measurement 4'-6" 4,_6" Vane ON A SLOPE IRREGULAR SWELLING (Requires Discretion) ).„.„.„ Lines of Measurement = : "' "' Line of Measurement 4' 6" .4;r.6":: • • MULTI-STEMMED TREE LEANING TREE Source: COA Diameter Measurement: The diameter of the protected tree shall be measured as shown. The diameter of a multi-trunk tree shall be determined by adding the total diameter of the largest trunk to 1/2 the diameter of each additional trunk. , 7$aO , , APPENDIX 'F' EXAMPLE BUILDER SITE PLAN -T--1- - -T-1-6,0' U'i1Ll"i`( tSMT �O REP.g. M CNT S TR � __, atzvs ( <3O ) I >I 1 \ 15..._ e POST OhK -T o rdE < ,_ _!VFIE MOVED PRESEevED TREE / WI' PERmtT t. Tiincto- IliA I REQUEST ( \ s I s ,pr yT -f- ) 1.... 6tNc. + TTZEES To8B _ E X1 ST 1 N C T P�6E ow. \ P.EMOYED _ 'to REMAIN o -kyr`(p tc Ci- PRoPoSEO HOUSE ` RE PLAcG E MENT 1-TEE S 7 i ,� \ — TREES To es + i I l\Jl — Remover) \1 • o I \ Li"utr \` v 'f��P.ED j + y oRK OAK a / Q // 3 o - --1 - - -- �R.o.W.—-o SIDEWocLK STREET TREE REMOVAL PERMIT REQUEST PREPARED BY OWNER: 2143 OAK ST. , SOUTHLAKE-4/18/93 MR. TREE SAVER 1913 SPRUCE ST. DALLAS, TX. 70418 PH. 214/240-2108 gB.a1 F APPENDIX 'G' TREE PRUNING RECOMMENDATIONS branch No Yes No bark ridge f f � i `� Yes XI t i collar t 1 When removing a branch, always cut outside the Branches that do not have a distinct collar should be branch bark ridge and collar. Do not make a flush cut at a right angle to the branch outside the branch cut. bark ridge. branches J 1 -*-rc branches 11/4: trii'C codominant �`' stems li ` i, ,/ 2 remove limb �� t t `. collar 1 under cut bark `. 3 cut stub ridge '��Yes I outside of collar When removing heavy limbs, first make an Trees may have codominant stems,as shown on the undercut several inches outside of the collar. Then left. If a codominant stem must be removed, cut at remove limb by a second cut an inch or so outside of an angle outside of the bark ridge as shown in the the first cut. Remove stub with a third cut just insert at right. Avoid leaving any stub. outside of the collar. (Feucht,1985) 1,8 aa� City of Southlake,Texas ' MEMORANDUM June 3 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-L Ordinance No. 480-L provides a variance procedure to properties within the "P.U.D. , " "S-P-1, " and "S-P-2" districts by empowering the Board of Adjustment to grant variances within limits (10% of the required yard) per the established procedures in Section 44, "Board of Adjustment," of the zoning ordinance. For properties zoned "P.U.D. , " "S-P-1, " and "S-P-2, " no district regulations are established by ordinance and are "created" through approval of the concept or site plan accompanying the zoning request. Currently, there is no provision which allows an applicant within these districts to seek a variance, and the Board has no authority to grant variances to these districts because they would essentially be rezoning the property. Ordinance No. 480-L will provide applicant' s within the "P.U.D. , " "S-P-1, " and S-P-2" a process to seek a variance, if needed. Attached you will find a letter dated 5/7/93 from Phil Jobe offering comments on the variance "limitations" recommended by staff. On May 20, 1993 , the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0) of this ordinance as presented. On June 1, 1993, the City Council approved (5-0) the First Reading of Ordinance No. 480-L as submitted. KPG Attachment : Ordinance No. 480-L Letter dated 5/7/93 C:\WPFILES\MEM0480.L 7e-i ORDINANCE NO. 480-L AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAXE, TEXAS, BY ADDING VARIANCE PROCEDURES FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS IN THE "P.U.D. " PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AND S-P-2 GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR;VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the Zoning Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake now deems it necessary to amend Ordinance No. 480, as amended, to provide variance procedures for certain development regulations in the "P.U.D. " Planned Unit Development District, the "S-P-l" Detailed Site Plan District, and the "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. WHEREAS, the City Council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the Zoning Ordinance as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAXE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 That Section 30 . 5 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph: "The Board of Adjustment may grant variances of up to, but not exceeding, ten percent (10%) of any required setback or lot coverage requirement established by the City Council in the specific P.U.D. regulations at the time of zoning of said Planned Unit Development. This approval shall be per the requirements set forth in Section 44.3 (b) of the Zoning Ordinance. " SECTION 2 • That Section 31, "S-P-i" Detailed Site Plan District of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding a new Section 31. 6 to read as follows : "VARIANCES - The Board of Adjustment may grant variances of up to, but not exceeding, ten percent (10%) of any required setback or lot coverage requirement established by the City Council in the specific "S-P-1" regulations at the time of zoning of said Site Plan District. This approval shall be per the requirements set forth in Section 44.3 (b) of the Zoning Ordinance. " SECTION 3 That Section 32 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding a new Section 32 .7 to read as follows: "VARIANCES - The Board of Adjustment may grant variances • of up to, but not exceeding, ten percent (10%) of any required setback or lot coverage requirement established by the City Council in the specific "S-P-2" regulations at the time of zoning of said Site Plan District. This approval shall be per the requirements set forth in Section 44.3 (b) of the Zoning Ordinance. " SECTION 4 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. 70-3 SECTION 5 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and section of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 6 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2, 000 . 00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offence. SECTION 7 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provision of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances regarding "P.U.D. " district regulations which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts . SECTION 8 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 9 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 2 . 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. (7c-5 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1993 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1993 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: 10-6 • • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 8, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 93-19 Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for approximately 2.85 acres situated in the Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, Tracts A and Al of the Burger Addition. LOCATION: East side of N. Peytonville Avenue, Southeast of Trail Creek Addition and being more commonly known as 1355 & 1375 N. Peytonville Ave. OWNER/APPLICANT: James E. & Emma F. Burger CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND INFO: This property was originally platted in 1980 as a "gift of love. " This platting process did not require zoning approval at the time of platting. NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) RESPONSES: None P & Z ACTION: May 20, 1993; Approved (5-0) COUNCIL ACTION: June 1, 1993.; Approved (5-0) , First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-86. /U Y).-- KPG/gj C:\CD\KAREN\MEMO\ZA93-19.MEM ' / D.+I I -1� —--I . /l3 M II°' 6111111111111Lk SLOW A-I1,4 I .lid. ENTAI 101WoMA 1 r .. ,u la itzsuiudl 1 ' : ■i_• NEI "I" ��ffikAl .�•T,�IIWIN rtl ---+-------------- in ..^ _ NIP. \\-7 i �r ■ �1i bIiir 1 -103-4-7 ■11111i ■■IM.ICI s ©I �. tlll.(ntl. FAARYIfr� 2AmeniiIIIIII! � �. DA' 'A ®I�rY �� 4 J.1 III_WIf3T Lilii'I:t�:7� m, ,� 1 iritiai &I� G/ o o ii kinE,4, .• 11� oitt izarAii 1 .. =Id a 1; , litilifil Mall o III■ ;rl, tee© Ii : allmm i ■■■mopLOH ��se "pi�laII I , Vroolilia.millil--. �1 Ail �� mil ai, . of*siliv, •' jup wily is4gkkissimil,:::), • • .... . , 7 A 01414:111:„Ilekb4r414 lir ika.IA tilj FM T 11 C AIN"Y ' iiiini illiiMINE{ . ' , i. Irti ill 117410101015 'I - .... ..--'111N '4 illU I illi PM: ars it W m. i__��i �Il��1 iri:►1'4*0��4, ♦ 1����■ imi'''ivov o w �B ��,i Null 1 l. • 1 111, 2 1 1 1I] .i. .ii4i4J mrii 7 1 1wipam 1 . "'impumuliniu tar IMILIDIA *--tA41.1101 AM414.47A411111111tidillirailir I....mu,1,,,: — m rikleallaNt-iaw 7,4, _or Atirgtip...wil rownwA 1,w. imiranzaz li: ig Lill. evi'm . =.""A-a" M 1111k*Pr/'41111101411,1101111411...3161111 iliFilirill 112%11:21=711 1 le iim P egittat *vitl*At0-..#1 :- -24"limmartl:All. ...LA 4 WP ,4 os is orsiri libi-,--A)_Asi- .;•; ad la 1 t WA �; I tea/► "0111111110 � ♦W,44164►11►:� n11111110 �� .1 _10 1 TRACT LOCATION MAP o o , Iit i ' . . i —..... . i.iri_pi. . ..„,4„,* �y�� �' ❑ u murolo /fi0Smt. 4i4 u wirot or , u + w HIGH SCHOOL ♦ 411 IA ciivii LA MEM 1 ! AS*4.' 0."•t ; rill*• ittS.I. 5ii .1 rd-k4 - 1 . Ai .2 p#.. -... Aidliv,.,„ ,,,... , w :i n, 1. I .,,,•.z• 41 r� L • TR. 1A xoo zoo � . G - 119 TR 1 9>0 » 54.9i 3 $ 309 R2 „ R 1 „ - VREE L. 715 200 a2a20 2 R5 us R8 I Soo R7 "AG" 6 " TR 16 N ' 2.3AC LK STOCKING CIR I 290 157 500 TA in 11 _ TR.3C H.Taylor`' 2 9B7 - 271 i0 F. 9 Y "AG" TR 30 M.Hatcher TR.30 4.0 AC $ 12 I D.Moilan ., "SF-1" I Q 532 250 zoo 200 ' 'A A / 1 ' 0�N "AG" TR 3H 3:85 AC TR.3C h J. Burger 8.79 @ 1 I TR• 'T A ��3 / 320 A.Janes 1 "AG" - I // 5i3 D.Weeks TR 3 3.66 AC "AG". ,. TR.30 " 7 . 10.042 @ TR 38 9 sro I .09 ,� I TR.381 TR 3E $ 1.07 AC 2.92 AC • 6 5 lit "AG"�� Q I ISM • . • ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING ', ' ' IH.382 r...ct 202 Z 2. 1 AC zee O 1 TR 3F Cross Timber Hills: 3 '.1W i 3.9 AC k • J- 0 8 "SF-1" i O \ 1 I 302 I 520 — 71)-3 v1 TR 1106 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. -IP ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS •OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A �:.A..-�••.-•.• ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE oto RININEWAVIIIMAMO. ..............::.:...... im '•Q , b MORE FiltL2' 7`IMTI7...•COMPI.,ETELY'....DE'SCRIB D IN EXHIBIT 'r. " FROM A.•'.x.'.<' » 5.''glimm TO sU$w..- ` s'>v: ..•,�....``:�:. a h ` �f ores':': �<o` L T SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC R.EOt.7IR.EMENTS CONTAINSD IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of , the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a. .comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the ei hernafter described property is currently zoned as >E' ; ' ` d " > `-:> under the City' s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; aria— WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading C:CD\ORD\480.86 Page 1 spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demanc .s them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, • and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1 . That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being .a .proximately...a...2'8 ...acre tract of land out of the T omas Hooti urvey,. .A i.stract . o a }'7* , Tra.et , . •d es oompx <:Z e :.:::•::•:�:.:: ?:::,', and more ful1,::: and::::.com 1•etel descri.liec'.' ''" inxhiibt "A, " attached hereto and incorporated herein. From :•;:..A. ::.;:•;<•<:•:: • .': : :.•'atatal to ':s : A' ::>:»`::.:<i:# :;: :::,{:;<v:: :. :.>a:..:: C:CD\ORD\480.86 �y �� Page 2 _ / )WE4'40.4#00008Vrag. Section 2 . That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3 . That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4 . That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future;' to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5 . That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6 . That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7 . Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2, 000 . 00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8 . All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, C:CD\ORD\480.86 1 4- 6 Page 3 whether pending in court or not, under such .ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with. a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3 . 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10 . This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1993 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1993 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C:CD\ORD\480.86 / 6-7 Page 4 • EXHIBIT 'A' Described as approximately 2 . 85 acres situated in the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706 and more commonly known as Tracts A and Al of the Burger Additioai as shown on a plat of record in Volume 388- 139, Page 17, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. °7-D-8 City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 8, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 93-23 Concept Plan REQUESTED ACTION: Concept Plan approval for Greenlee Business Park, being the proposed Lot lA and Lot 1B, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529. LOCATION: 2000 to 2100-block of East Continental Blvd. OWNER/APPLICANT: J.K. Development CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial BACKGROUND INFO: The applicant is subdividing Lot 1 into two lots and anticipates that the "future development" will be a "mirror image" of the proposed development shown on the concept plan. The applicant proposes a 5,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse of which 1,500 sq. ft. will be office use and the remaining square footage to be warehouse use. He plans to construct a 1,200 sq. ft. storage building in the future. The applicant proposes a 24' common access driveway on Lot lA to service both lots and requests a variance to eliminate the bufferyard requirements in the common drive and all others North of the principal buildings shown on the concept plan. NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: One in favor: Apex Aviation, 1951 E. Continental Blvd. P &_Z ACTION: June 3, 1993; Approved (6-0) subject to the Plan Review Summary dated May 28, 1993 and granted the variance to eliminate the bufferyard requirements in the common drive. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the second Plan Review Summary dated June 11, 1993. At- KPG C:\CD\EAREN\MEMO\ZA93-23.MEM 8 ,1- m ,1 NiJuIh u , -'. �� MIMI=maw ,gill OW low�... �4:.,. I NORTHWESTA. PKWY. S�l.� Mil I ral . 11111 r,,,,t4i,1114 © u ... 411 illatiiii JD V..., II,..) 7,7 I .44,. E Mr' L III1 R,, s H 3`I s a K w �' ' Iw ro i . ., Ivo', IMII et -- . taniglif 9 m ',144:55., iii/111" 11 . 1,--,-, i © iip ,„impt,,,©IMF �, i1. %MICI .� bO111E7 a �'�� �,� 3A u, Min .eOC9nM A. �P3 �'� • 7 '"Ma AH �+IIGFIT � r. WW •1111111111111- II 1 ' MU 70 1 d G1 . "1 ip Ati -. , p ,. maw , , ". 1 w wl PSI =lead " e Mil-1 --—--q ' „ ,, J.W. HALE PIONIERI ;,; ,A • NA R M' III .. . 1 W !A i •w 1 ' = I V'1A i .. 1 ICI w �i M 1 A Y� I Im w I OW �•;1\` I-i t � 4 2w ll' 164 NEP " BE I L.. _ JIN _ N. Wile i ONALD ©--ma�c© i --=1UA - `, ,` • Mr _ i I w mia I CJI ' 1.• \ HOLLII�IGSWO'-,TH �i� , rt)r>I L:� Y' Nam-- W • I r�'I ul MIN EARN w i� u� �4 y DARN I �). ' m I to MI ,,,. 'VA +J40"J -- CO A-V, © HARRISON DIE' KER ,a --,,„---- .,,a•R� Mil ,,,., . .- /�" 1 , ,,..d. m9-1`04 ,!,11,, _ r,,,. - i A. TI -- ------ - JOH': h GIE3 A I:• w� I to I � � �'' P i� 7•' T;• � a I . .� W.`P. DAVI NPORT - ' �.// J• Oi 90'° CHEATHAM & A�w 1� OS n \kr til • „Apo CONSULTING ENGINEERS — SURVE 1170 CORPORATE SUITE 207 Al (817) 633-1023 TRACT LOCATION MAP • TR 6A 8.36 AC I 7 2.975 @ s oTR 6 TRACT 5 F °s4st 8.882 AC R BEY J• SUP Zg Pis TA 681 6 I 8 AC \j 3.003 @ I 1 TR 6E 166�� al GAETR 6C TR 60 4.57 ACCC 3 AC 3 AC 0 .1.7. .1.1• 4 U SUN SQUARE DEV.INC. TRACT 4 MEMO INDUSTRIAL PLANNING INC. • TR 6F 4.07 AC S 2 3 • FDIC / //e://: II 1 TA 104K3 TA 16100 - APEX AVIATION GROUP TRa1B4K 1 67 AC H 0 436 r i EXPLORER PIPELINE CO. .46 AC TR 1810E '9606 .�4" a 1 •I•Z' • TA 184K1 .45 AC .1.145 @ .515 AC TR 1810E TR SBSOA iR se P TR 184K2A .45 AC .45 AC -"fits 46 @ TR 1810G TA 1810C! TR TR 181A 0 TA 184K2 .45 AC .45 AC '6C2 15.6 AC .46 @ TR 1812 TR 1815 i U R TA•a64@2B - ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING TR 184G -- - `. -- - - 1 .46 AC TR 415 5@8 ' TR 1B i1;i •T TA 184H .46 @ , .46 AC I..• TA 1917 ,,.ia •9 - U TR 184L5 TR 185 U •4 AC 6R I 46 AC S 5 @ Z TR 1818 ,use IR N TR 1B4L4 J _ .4 AC 0 .46 AC 1 „ccTR 1813 Rio IE 3 TR 1B4L3 to •4 AC 60 f .46 AC T.45 ACA 1-- TR 1816 pie TA 184L2 .4 AC 66 IR TR 1811 TA 188 TA.46 AC .45 AC .4 AC 60 IR3 TA 184L6A TR 189A TR 181 i .46 @ .45 AC TR SBBA .�10 16.654 AC .4 AC 661 1M1 TA 184L6 TR 1898 1 .46 AC .45 AC TR SACC ...la 4 3 Irl2 TA 184L TA 1 .46 AC T451AC TR 1888 AC ...6e2 30 TR 104L7 TR 189C TA an,a4 TR .46 @ .45 AC - TR 107C 48 TR 104L .45 AC T smP- 3 TR 181C / ` .515 @ / f 1 TR 1843 TR43 BAC 1 -4-0 11, n' j6i r - --- T., City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 93-23 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 6/11/93 PROJECT NAME : Concept Plan for Building Permit in the "I-1" Zoning District Block 1, Lot 1A & 1B, Greenlee Business Park OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Mike Darden Commercial Interiors J.K. Development, Inc . 9034 Longmont Drive 603 Dene Court Dallas, Texas 75238 Southlake, Texas 76092 PHONE : PHONE : (214) 341-7617 FAX: FAX: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/7/93 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS . IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . 1 . Correct the bufferyard depth on the North property line of Lot 1A to 10' . Any modification to this allowed maximum depth would require City Council approval . * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a development site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees : Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees . * No review of the landscaping is intended with this concept plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit . * Adequacy of parking will be determined upon submittal of the development site plan. A summary of square footage by use will be required to determine parking requirements . * All signs and culverts must be permitted separately. * Denotes Informational Comment cc : Mikal Darden, J.K. Development, Inc . Commercial Interiors F. I _Zoff..P=1 - at-UEL:un..ms _ Eni^"4.-ei Nowa- 1i1 a•Ma.sr>.uu. M ytAJ.•.i W.„,ir 1 wtl•+-rt III.,*' itl.4 4 '0, c 1.' love. - rur...-a i GQ--� Cr �L- - w...••,-re . :d y.serrn� ...o.,rfa a C+.•.Y(1st. - Fc. r.el. eur ' a .r*: e fpAlb!,IY P1 1� ' p.i OSYsbRiM4 u . •• Alb!, _ - rn f..Ja•f Q i — _' I I...crr1.Iy .1., y L�r y A . ` -_ --•---- ---- 3-��S-1- _ Zrleo 3-L Ip _Z+7ER21 _ 2.....119,.L L _ _- _=_ — Z a)Ef-r f-EMa I jOe+A•t•3 0 ! LaorY,/AK ! owele:A¢w.1;C., &'e 4 _ 4Z4K of 41 .er b f - _ _-_ 7. i, ; 4- eG[fvvO-ELG G.AMA.ne .JI�i-'-- j b--••aa..e:‘�.rr 4) 1e ,ir ur .0 nNu.rs:LanaL. -I.uMiuP4 p,..(pyG C I : /of-0.YC r _ L+12-.jpJ•lRµ. __y_ - i ==_ ALt2-1,0-ii em = + % H ns+uroTw if l+-rra.emelt.. �' I r , L • — _= )r. 1�'--t'G ci - } . m O -'-r-_---; 'w 7 .. . al' ; - I I,, tz SOUTH ELEVATION I I rvr'.' y L__�'q.1 11 • • fr I h n..r•...T..o 1 _y;.t _'�_ .1 -1•-- . • van'... �: � �� • JK Development, Inc. • . LOT 1 A Sl 1-B BLOCK 1 Q A ul+••Q+• u. - 1su r. 1 �` I °M_ Greenlee Business Park ivy i/////, no i �w�yyrt City of Southlake """ r Y ' EAST SOVTHIAlIEBLVD Tarrant County,Texas • • . lc f . ....0..,....... - . . I:1 A w 1 1• _ OWNER JK Dciebpmerrt,Ins v(` I 1 3 tt' j t 803 Dene Cart 1 1 ' '— SartMake,Tema 76092 L-----1 4.dd .{ Mikal Darden aaae. • I yantA Y-'gym' d Q r0 • LM a....a v tt..0 3 -. or../al. anut ' - - a�m.r k/. , } BITE 1. aef.d 941 91f.o'91%1 y..ynns 3 �. j CON 7N AL BLVD ��' • oft e}fnT Cc•JrimeNr(.M..2.= r II 74 _ �f1F' �..IL. a -U.- ._ 411IN CONCEPT PLAN 411IN VICINITY MAP Y ve jl •.s • • u-.. . , n I1 IR@ARID BY: Cm.r..n+imams. .•WAY..—a4q. - n4la0i 1Cm. u....•..1�.[d[.na.ter.m.+u®•..w ar..Tea.)lZJ3 i n.Yf-�1. f....� I I I I I I 1 I I I I CONCEPT PLAN FOR BUILDING PERMIT IN THE"I-I"ZONING DISTRICT q O' is Ma TITLE SHEETI( City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 8, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 93-24 Plat Revision REQUESTED ACTION: A Plat Revision of Lot lA and Lot 1B, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, being situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529 and being a revision of Lot 1, Block 1, Greenlee Business. Park. LOCATION: 2000 to 2100-block of East Continental OWNER/APPLICANT: J.K. Development CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial NO. NOTICES SENT: Five RESPONSES: One in favor: Apex Aviation, 1951 E. Continental Blvd. P & Z ACTION: June 3, 1993; Approved (6-0) subject to the Plat Review Summary dated May 28, 1993 and adding item #10 to read as follows: "Applicant shall provide a 24' x 150' Common Access Easement along the east line of Lot 1B to facilitate the common driveway. " STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the second Plat Review Summary dated June 11, 1993 . 014 / KPG C:\CD\KAREN\MEMO\ZA93-24.MEM � B-I ;- ., 01 MI MSraps 1 , U I —.�!!�0 l al'a ©dG ©© :'1�'t� r ' - ' raildiandm \ED ---, 221 I • A I i . — WEIR r ,.-., 1 y I .111 113 MIN All NORTHWEST '^ __ PKWY EAST A 11.111 al 1 1 j y►i7 NA I I U :ill l 1 •�'a -I/ e.. lirSii IAA) VI ; C wr Mamma um. 1 ? .triii t I x w II, TA I F 1 a IC N Op'• imi� _ ,'. Ieu 11 ! -I 1111 I Il 9 a .�'" m r 1 ull`"- Iq 7A •. •uu Vr t J► 2' uw w1 ° I r x i , VArl --1 1 WA 70 1 J1,.eW. _ O I . — I tK PI- �111 I •E, I• JObfN� A. PREENA ' . ,4 � '1 . .tf , >A AK W. KNIGHT =,••A*. I a�1 i I I 1"J.M, H y Ai 1 w IZ' i Oe' 8•1 , i 1 OW 10 I nowt _N��� „ J.W. HALE f,l Ill I --- MI U�tA U i >Q I ; f/ I WA , In l • LS i,- to 1 .1 ■ in C N1 W 1 U Z, iA� I 1l .i.1 ,C it ' t all C® t �i\ 1 RY' in IC qM! 1 1 t IAL,i 17 I ' 11I 1 w I s II I \�. He DONALD l� `L% MAT Ipl.11flAt R70 _ __ __ __ _ -_ ___ 7 - YI[/ A-ION i�J(��7/��•" g ll 'to i ■ r 'A �.- . Y �, to w © mA \`\ /_ A1.te 11 12.10112 I. l' i! 11 is J��yj I ' i 4� �� 1 1.1: J ' YI It . IIMI •■1"Ellir-.3.171. 1'.� JMal rr _..J a aA W. irk 'A' cog .1., sr HARI�I3O 1 DLEW KE s% • �.. AMC'._.,. M�� 2 1 , A :1.:. A. TI •,� �EgfAI ID I IFF s'' IP • (<e MI / • I I10 G A ..... ' 1 W.°. DAVENPORT .� • &molt r 001. C HEATHAM . & Al �' ,, �� �yWc w`'�` CONSULTING ENGINEERS — SURVE f''{I• l! 1170 CORPORATE SUITE 207 Al (817) 633-1023 TRACT LOCATION MAP 6' 8- � TR 6A 8.36 AC I 7 7.. 2.975 @ I w' TR 6 QSV TRACT 5 FREE YA 8.882 ac J. SuR529 A' TR 681 6 1 8 AC 3.003 @ 1 1 . 5 PK • 1 logUS L o I TR 6E 1603 P', TR 6C TR 60 4.57 AC R E 3 AC 3 AC 0 •I-t. •I.,• q U SUN SQUARE DEV.INC. Z1 TRACT 4 MEMO INDUSTRIAL PLANNING INC. • TR 6F 4.07 AC 3 2 3 1 r FDIC 1 A I, _........9 ____________ E. CS3 1 TR 1B4K3 • APEX AVIATION GROUP .46 @ TR 18100 - 1 TR 184K t .67 AC N or 3 1 EXPLORER PIPELINE CO. a I-, 1 .46 AC TA 1810E NO�06 • • a •I-2 TR 1134K1 .45 AC 1.145 @ .515 AC `44 7R TR 1810F TR 1B10A 1e P TR 1B4K2A .45 AC .45 AC --mi. .46 @ TR 1E1100 TR SBSOCI TA TR SBSa 0 TR 1B4K2 .45 AC .45 AC r6cz 15.6 AC .46 @ TR 1812 TA 1815 rTA a UTA 46 4@ 2B 1 ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING TA 184E - .46 AC TR 1858 .45 @ .461@ 'iee T TR 1B4H -`I--'- ! .46 AC i- TA 1017 rie U .4 AC 6H I .5 V TA 184L5 TA 185 ! .46 AC 1.5 @ Z TR 1E118 „Is1 r IR N TR 1B4L4 J .4 AC 6,1 o .46 AC q w TR 1813 rig IE 0 TR 184L3 ` TR 1811A F 4 AC 60 .46 AC .45 AC Fes- TA 1816 r6 TR IM TA LB4L2 .4 AC 6 TR 1811 TR 188 TR .46 AC _ .45 AC .4 AC r66 IM3 TR 184L6A TR 101 1 TR 1B9A TR iBBA TR 1 .46 @ .45 AC ....if! 16.654 AC I .4 AC eel IM1 TA 184L6 TR 1B9B ? .46 AC .45 AC TFg1ACC r1TR IM2 TA 184L1 TR 189 TR .46 AC .45 AC TR 188B se .4 AC 682 s0 TR 184L7 TR 189C 46 @ .45 AC TR 1E 4 RR 1 4B T.45 ACTR 1 3LJ3 7R 181C TR 184E 1 .515 @ I 7R 1B4A TRg1BAC / " TR 187 J TA I 1.9- 96 @ City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 93-24 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 6/11/93 PROJECT NAME: Plat Revision - Greenlee Business Park, Lots 1A & 1B, Block 1 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: J. K. Development , Inc . Mizell Land Surveying, Inc . 603 Dene Court 513 N. Highway 1187 Southlake, Texas 76092 Aledo, Texas 76008 PHONE: (817) 481-0029 PHONE : (817) 441-6199 FAX: FAX: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/7/93 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . * This submittal appears to meet all the requirements of our previous review. * Original signatures will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat . Also required are two sets of owner' s . dedications and notaries (8 . 5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: J. K. Development, Inc. Mizell Land Surveying, Inc. ,g_ "T�/ • t . i ��'i a' mow. _ .�_�.= — , MON li . • • ' I• i4 � N • a. .a0 �..ra••��. •�In Imo raw er AL V . - et.I4/ y0 ei ICI")uGLOrMCLT r M —r rrr•" •K _.rw r 0 - . ykL s It:g td I'-,° awl:. .. —1 /' IyIL•sT GCl� -- to I v � v - 4 -r— Ir ' ,,... /fu, I• 7 14 ID • �; a el a . a 4 IZ • • �� C. It • fl Q � • 3 • I� j r A . CO , t 0 . V- . wG tcw G.4-.t✓.13, La e799 i,Qn9i (Pt I z /fl I IS IiLCt/� H••II V� \ • ' MILS • ARC 0. %GT Z%.. duo•rvt LM-C P art �,b : ...am,A.lRCLUAU 6fAQVd • = 3 EAST lteiJr7C. So00EURRO /+Agar a�r cc• sc.accv Plat R�� • ' .s tow.... q•..�Ir lab IA awl 1!.Mock 1 _ I GHZ!)1LZZ' BIISIISZSS l�RZ I.1t1t I CCI"LORL�T .RLI4.0 t/ Le/ bCr IrB4•ilae �4 - My of$NLbLL Twat County.T.a. LaT Cl.O KKGR A..69A AGt7?/ � .es.. •IIarisfa of Lot 1.Mock 1 i GRmtL=E11�i7SS PARK Imo ' ( Aa AddltSa to Ow Cly at b'•l 1 Tarot Comity,TWO/ . fa•.3if0:•1 PYt7 - • Plat G.md•.Tarrant Carty.Tta Ilde 2.11T Ao..sitar✓1 no 'i a„�,�.mo• •2OId A.TR.IDlA1 f0KThT-.A t.!a Sit • .•ti_a•r4r.• ,-—— -— _ ` • .T ..a,Comty, mT . • r . _ +i-mn '{•drr't�bi' .-r1 7 spromo Dor .fir a.. _ • �at�a.ataw=- - . �1�•Oal _ _ . �C_IAA L 1Yid • wr.._ r �... n.. ' City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 8, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 93-26 Rezoning and Concept Plan REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan approval for the Dominion, being 38.514 acres situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. LOCATION: 300 to 400-block of East Continental Blvd. OWNER: JBM Development Corp. APPLICANT: Goodwin & Marshall, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low and Medium Density BACKGROUND INFO: The developer proposes fifty-five (55) single family residential lots with two common areas, each containing a lake. NO. NOTICES SENT: Eleven . RESPONSES: Two written, both undecided: * Bobby Marriott, 223 Lilac Lane, offered concern regarding the pond and existing trees on the common property line. The pond adds aesthetic value to his property, provides water for his livestock, and offers flood control. * Bruce McCombs, 280 Lilac Lane, expressed concern regarding the proposed lot sizes and would prefer to see zoning consistent with the 2 1/2 to 7 acre tracts in the area. He also was concerned about the variable R.O.W. on Lilac Lane and the increased traffic on Lilac Lane and Pine Street. P & Z ACTION: June 3, 1993; Approved (6-0) subject to the Plan Review Summary dated May 28, 1993 . STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the second Plan Review Summary dated June 11, 1993 . Or KPG C:\CD\KAREN\MEMO\ZA93-26.MEM —mowE EV I s w Ara an 3 - 37 ffl ' 3C ■ I 3Ar g i -Y S r rl 203 Y H 341 3S 31 IC • 21 i raih Pc'.'" pTrict -44/4 , aliunrein c--T!..,-,..11:11166" — . I.wr,• i, );ii,klivii!in - la'■.� it01: 1 , I��R�R-�-I'l 4.11 Ls 3 1'i;J0,1 ., w /►= , s c♦1 Ar " �11 4 '`\� ♦ f � � a mA MCC v. .re1�, t (I OI�EDI�H W. KNIGHT i 1- r= AD r'3 . Ac 4 M • . . . 1-.J. HYDE/ 11111—ig• . _ - y- AA! IIIVIO 1 Ei ..._ -... r kid'''. . mr-1., : ici r ., L7:i•: u r x •mi ir• , Anil* . • 1 isi w w �' .... ` r. , u w, war eon.•„IL aw ,` 7 I II , al' a tiprt t fil""414. Ain I .,./. I ti um igpriv. is -', ‘....,..._arN RaLt.444r4lan j.j., liww tio) auncr Vr' *opt 1.1.7,414040 ez mAR N f ,. - 9 . .°°'. lit Itig451:4/1i1 2 :COW 40., . I. ` N Rmoa5 x: 'Piny ,�,�;, 'firw / i x w - r, R-----1 1- eI � A fp ' w I� `C' uu ow" ,� �� � A ® (� ' I,a .%. DAVENPORT •=,,m4 1.4211 di I A iV .� IwumL I ___, I ' j �rr -I I A 1 f ,\imi �- TRACT LOCATION MAP . 8 C- 4 • y . . .,.. I ggglo EEC( rll 1B .i0K r`- 1 . .-----..._._..._ _.- 3 TR 2A F. CA TR 381 \V/ ... ' 3Ii S R.� ....._" r, 3 yf —� .5Bi .SBA ifi ! _ �___.... ,Ai.'\ TR 282 I - - 20.09 AC p ,. ez, TR 2B3C o•piGi Bg�xlttcuML Fa 1C�.% -AO- -AO• E 1.96 0 ! 1 A/ '.1 JOL'2f^I 1 TR 283A ¢ t Tfl 2AC t .11� TR 2Bi O. t V 5.1 AC 2.33 AC A.0 AC A°' LL03MFaI �' ¢ , I 1• 'SF-1 I I 1 , iTEVFNB MCCOMBS 3 M.li 99IApDN r I I \ - I I ) P. d�• LILAC LILAC LN I " I ! 2E3A �ti AC I • _ 9 PLAG� AD' APEI { 3$ TR 2C1A Ag5 2 Tfl 2C ! Tfl 2C3 ! ! 7 0 AC 2C2 0.15 AC I A,0 AC 3.5A AC !0. C (7.15 AC)(1.0 AC) E r-- 1 . 14AARI01T . MOSSE LARD • OW.CORP. 1 k• ..1 I 1 • ... a `, ^ 22 921• 20. 19 . 10! 1721 16 M TR .Oo., ! 'V` 23 2 MO IAN.���CLLLOII'�1 !C A MOBIL LAND CORP:r ! •w, UV G I" 32 A•11 14 SIWERM000 CIR 15 J 93 •1. .. n A • _ 5 !6 !7 66 8 of .78 ACle• 2 31. ! • I 25 • .8 04. TR BE I f4C151pur 4 . C i M i sc,*1 5010 - 27 SILVEq 1' 001 — '� MOpo Cui • ON TR e 11 I TR 5C1 II a� , ' is 0 1° . 2.05 AC �' OBIL LAND CORP.O00 29 ! _ - 44- y}y� C010-1 95B.REEH 2 TR BES MOBIL LAND CORP. 1 ' �„ 1.57 0'000elliiir.. lir 38 VVv . ... C-- •0. ,r,H E5 A r 10 - . . SA 39 SPY PI' NiQy P • _ I L1 • TR BE7A•ippoci,5555) ) 9 1' 15'619 • MA cuST°" • 16 • ! f . TRACT `� '19 MOBIL I. LAND CORP. ••KNp00 • •_~ MOBIL LAND CORP./ I TRACT 'a i 1a .T'P.U.D.• 6 I TR BE . 2R !, 20 I. 2f ! 22. ' AC i 14 GLEHROSE CTkm C� I • I 1ll'aCCCCC�����311ffff�BB�11BIIEEEEEE'iiffffEEEvEE11�11�1l ii 0,011p 43 w T 3cT t ! . ,'1. - 3 II OAKCpEST CT o t.J -I . . j D CD:.. a 1, 16 ! 0 a i5 O. `i`.` 1 3 2 13 : • 5 2 \ f- �•� 1 I HIGHLAND OAKS CIR N, I l 46 47 Z 7 -•�l /�• COMMON GREEN f I. 1 o L-B1.00 - - - - I ` 32 CIA _ 1 ,1 \� Tfl 3C3A'�! ./ . .� 4 ! _ I TR 3C2C• TR 3C1 f.03 9; 1.46 I 1.66 9 MOBIL LAND CORP.• • ADJA ENT OWN IERS &c ZONING • se- ::3 City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 93-26 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: _ 6/11/93 PROJECT NAME: Concept Plan for the Dominion Zoning Change Request to SF-20A 38 .514 Acres, O. W. Knight Survey Abstract #899 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: J.B.M. Development Corp. Goodwin & Marshall, Inc. 1905 Industrial Blvd. 6001 Bridge St. , Suite 100 Colleyville, Texas 76034 Fort Worth, Texas 76112 PHONE: (817) 329-8381 PHONE: (817) 429-4373 FAX: FAX: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/7/93 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . * We find the applicant has met all the requirements of our previous reviews . * A street stub to the east will be discussed with the review of the Preliminary Plat . * All signs and culverts must be permitted separately. * Denotes Informational Comment' cc: J.B.M. Development Corp. Goodwin and Marshall, Inc. �' ai' rN.[BON LAeD CORM I tbZONED SF-1 Nn 'a{ T o vrm Pare.Py.Ioa • \o� p\Jtt\ ro 9A.rcr. 11., J�1\AZONED AD p,a5t\ LOT 2CT4$ y SONEiO IN[.I J•p5\\ a ZONED MD No.l p� t t • 5�fo'0'k. ��E� 4ea-ol N v�p5\� D.c.saamo/r v p 4. C¢ yt 1,.9e rr s ON p • p5\0 • TZA(a RaoN At,�pE vow. {C1y..o• JS\0' • i �5 AO�,��.. Aaa ONE Mi CYZON ONE Nj BH`;0.0� 0� BQaa HJOHLANDS + -- �5\ ��� I eLOOT J I Ceele•r A.MI*A..1004 E DON lOVELACE < • P I MAR ON 4Ro•.u, \ 9Jr.rc.r.• /laI N 00"08'34'E __e26.J0_'__ f / Yrlw MR Pogo WI ZONED 10 I IT POfA! / JALGr. .e .� ) / _ a M lJ x is Ir II -- 1 flLpioa ; I 24 29 2a 17 I 2B DEOINNJAO I. N 67'24'$9'W rr LE -N DO•J077'E L___ -- w -/99•.2J' 124.94' '\ I 1 I i loo D.R.r,eT.. fir III >r `� 1 B a T 4 9 `I I J- "� II I I �_ I,e•s I 2 / I - T a I d I 13 r 12 -- -I- -- - I:I W ZONED AG -I tlll J I .? �- j-+ I I I• Q Y� ,ry I f J I a wi ...�.+Dr„' I , BLOCK 2 / ,S d,. - I 1 c : .;Ai P,.''r l2 - i 2l f 11 1 29 I Igi�r ^II - _:'y^'<u� a 9 ^"• 3 �. 20 I 11 - 2) IA-. . :4 1I I'i f )[� I. 4 - vII -k.--( - ;LEI g Ew . •y id I —r_1��-- 2D I 2J rI J`l��2 Vr I i • v r I 5 I I !1)` 1--� -- 2s /AYE riJ ) �[o-b ��� ►' i ti7i * \ I -- �_ I Z3,p9'J8• NAR/ON B.N[CONeSova Ril /,Jr .� Ry _ T �' -\ S180' IV.I.00 g.eee z III I:p 2I . s�''� -_�__1 �--� _ - -�1 - �- I /B 1 19I1! 0�•,21:- - - T - BLOCK l/2 I , S ZONED AO I S 01...OVJ'E 504.29' -' -I I ' S 80.567' E t I:I r`i'. • 7 B I -- Qr.Auc- 18.6T I I 2 I —L�-•- J[ BEAR CAM COIINUNI/!EJ A row.[nu.OID et (� �Wxc I- -- � '40'E�'•"'A A[RON LANOC O' oarcx' �.9en.f sa 3 a) Je u v K1 soy i !! _'7 ç6s2 oDr ZONE00wj O I..Jsr-s4B!r• JJ �y\ �.ppE 4 44 •a f 480-D1 P I 0 •,\ . J • NI' lUD N•• 6 \ I 'I 47 J• \\t DRIVE V A i VB ,1 4Q�ao�� cooxrar PARA ----- NOTE A 10 FOOT.LEVEL'EV DUFFERYARD i iiik, YLL DE PRONDEO ALONG TIE SOUTH I PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD ``I i I SITE DATA ./ 41 lEaAl DFlarran GROSS ACREAGE 38.514 ACRES ' •......«.1 bd.•. lea" AI.m.. m..r.J A ti ary EXISTING RIGHT-OF-SAY 0.448 ACRES ' .i I.o'• I..«w,...w<•.roe I• I'yr NET ACREAGE 36005 ACRES wu±P..i[M N.M`'..diri<4.r row a..ry,tom...w.,...,.md.ry N<.s.r PROPOSED NO.DWELLING UNITS SS LOTS p..,.e..n..••iwd K.. Rw ls•N ou... DENSITY lM U/A II Ii A«..i.d..d.J Su for[.I J w N.�.:,�:.,...r w.dI•.a ueLl OPEN SPACE 2.09 ACRES 0® v..r•�n.I•.non..«....J w nw I.ww...n EXISTING ZONING AO' EXISTING LAND USE AGRICULTURAL SCALE:I•SW RJ ei:ArI[.'.nV•e`.. eM. m::VII n•"-n a d ' PROPOSED LAMING PROPOSEDLANDUSE SF-20A MNSITY R ESIDENTIAL CITY LAND USE PLAN NEDIUA A LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL «w.i I;.Ili�1317•'4' 01 MU..I.w'rni L.4.e::n..,i`u'«.'w'."r ..' .l .r.y . . ry,i.« 1. rern,A.,lv, TaWE R.e'o•]r[.l.n In I.«A..f..d...rt..,Naao r•..I.eve..Os I..I Ia.OV...v...n ' •[door W..Low.•e.•I r..<N.N•Imo Y Nab OWNHRr 4rf J L City of ram•r•or-c.. ... .r. ,...r L..ow n..q..J JBM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 0. n NMkJ ome r.I.r•ro'd a...,A J t. n a ry.P .ue.ie I.a w.sir ONS INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD CON<8�i PLAN x W... COLLEYVE.LE,TERMS 780]4 �y • = _ rKNxa`, I. [av e.em M J.«e Net w.1 e...wn..m«.Iwn..r.. 1 817)329•BS81 n � � . .aa• d,<n..,.. .r.•n Colo L[w.n,....e...rr to THE DOMINION 'min u.nq nn . 1::N Loa our 1,1 n. alarA[ln!f L rno.I`srar[ay n.I.«L f.+d r...0•1 e.....m..... �/'I,� �pQ�T II ZONINGCHANGE C. vJirw Nnl.tl<ed A.M.,M rwMwt.Nv.f 0.1...d e..in .. GOOD WIN IN i N.R.[ r rry..�r 1°nn r Ml.«e..ry•,r.........dr.rJ,al.•i:o«.r.a.r C. {L 36114 ACRES S TM.I WU.o•[J•.e M OW Lo J W•A..J Go."eme.n NOM L....a N. ���D-'-�� O ���.�f��la l w«rmwn....ua......dr.d...• O. W. KNIGHT SURVEY. ABSTRACT NO. 899 C QV/ENdfHY=-PLANNERS-SURVEYORS YNTG"T KAP neon.8.1664"'n a.i"`...`.41'r'000l or iuN..L..rrl i Lod el."ua o:o fool n M. ro,Le�m rat 4"uai:."L�W'...,.«•i uiu.•ws•.Jw.r..".«'«".."',«,w.r• AM[INa••..t eas q r.n W.I.w.Ia r•...a•rS CITY OP SOUTHLALEL TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS 2 so.cm ass.an Mir.an CASE NO.ZA 93-25 i 0 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480- 'X AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS.. BEING APPROXIMATELY A MOO ACRE TRACT OF.LAND OUT OF THE 7i'x 4 tottimMPL : m>m::r;:ggikov<< 3'. ::�:::;:>. 3:`;`. , AND MORE FULLY.,.::AND CO TEL'S7f DE`SCRI'EED N.... I . EXHIBIT "A" FROM „11000 TO ` C "SUBJECT TO T'HE::.:8P.E...I:P`I,C:.:17EQYYIREMEl�7`I' ...CON AT1nrD IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR ' PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned " :t '' >€ `r as ltu under the Cit ' s Comprehensive Zoning O r d i ri a r c e ::::a r is d • WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking C:\CD\ORD\480.87\GJ - 6 Page 1 • areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made;, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1 . That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Bein a roximatel a WSW rg. P�:::::.::.::.:�..:::::::.:..:::::.:Y......:.:.: x. ~< acre tract of land out of the p::W:�::>; : ;: i:t :` ::M.: .s� >:: >.::::::.:::.:v.:::::::::::::.. . ::., : '�';:.�:<a:« ` ` :::: :::•.:::.�: ��;:�` :, and more fully and comp1et`ely' c escri ed' n x es:"A `'"`' attached hereto and incorporated herein. From : :<.:;:.::ogra;:.;t :':::_. to : >:: :.; :::ii:?> ::.... :: ::..... 7:�'. 1i�:• sMAaei igig?w'!+:::i:^: 7.�.t'r:•1:Otu�i:�:.::.....i::: .............................4\.nv:.::::.:...•....•..:}:r}:.w::.w:.:t:v:.:A•ii: C:\CD\ORD\480.87\GJ Page 2 ��� Section 2 . That the City Manager is hereby directed to . correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3 . That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4 . That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for,the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets,; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5 . That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances, where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6 . That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared 'to be •invalid, the same shall. not affect, the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7 . Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2, 000 . 00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8 . All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the' provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final C:\CD\ORD\480.87\GJ Page 3 Q O disposition by the courts. Section 9 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3 .13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10 . This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordaLned. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1993 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1993 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: PsgeD\ORD\480.87\GJ l 'Page 4 • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being a 38 514 acre tract of land in the 0 W Knight Survey Abstract No. 899 situated in the City ,. of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas and being the Four tracts described in deed recorded in Vol. 10433. Pg. 2111 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas and being ■or• particularly described as f olio,.: • BEGINNING at a I/2- iron pin set in Continental Boulevard ICounty Road No. 3099) IR.O.W. Varies). said pie being by deed call 914.8 feet East of the Southwest corner of the said O.W. Knight Survey and being the Southwest corner of the herein described tract: THENCE N 00'30'27" E along the East line of Timarron Phase One. Section One. The Highlands. on addition to the City of Southlake. T County. Texas as recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1014 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas. 1999.23 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found: THENCE N 87'24'59" W along the North line of said Timarron addition. 124.94 feet to a I/2" iron pin found. said pin also being the Southeast corner of a tract conveyed to B.L. Narrow by deed recorded in Vol. 9609. Pg. 906 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE N 00'08'34- E along the East line of said Narriot tract. 826.30 feet to a 1/2- iron pin found in Lilac Lae• 1R.O.W. Varies): THENCE S 89'05'19' E along Lilac Lou.. 400.83 feet to a I/2" iron pin found: THENCE 5 23'09'16' E along the west line of a tract conveyed to Bear Creek Coemenities by deed recorded in Vol. 9916. Pg. 82 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas. 186.78 feet to a 5/8' • iron pin found: THENCE S 32'39'09' E along the West line of said Bear Creek Communities tract, 183.86 Feet to a I/2" iron pin found: THENCE S 01'20'33' E along the West line of said Bear Creek Communities tract. 504.29 feet to a 5/8' iron pin found: THENCE S 85'58'35' E along the South line of said Bear Creek Communities tract 28.67 feet to a 1/2' iron pin found. said pin also being the Northwest corner of Oakwood Country Estates. as addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas as recorded in Vol. 388-140. Pg. 98 of the Plot Records of Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE S 06'32'40- E along the West line of said Oakwood Country Estates. 2015.21 feet to a 1/2' iron pin set in the aforesaid Continental Boulevard: THENCE N 89'15'27" W along Continental Boulevard. 738.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.677.668 square feet or 38.514 acres of land of ehich 9260 sgsar• feet or• is the existing right-of-way of Continental Boulevard and 10.159 square feet are within the existing right-of- •ay of Lilac Lane. leaving a net area of 1.658.249 square feet or 38.068 acres of laid. cee /b City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 8, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 93-25 Preliminary Plat REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for The Dominion, being 38.514 acres situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. LOCATION: 300 to 4p0-block of East Continental Blvd. OWNER: JBM Development Corp. APPLICANT: Goodwin & Marshall, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low and Medium Density BACKGROUND INFO. : The developer proposes fifty-five (55) single family residential lots NO. NOTICES SENT: Eleven RESPONSES: Two written, both undecided: * Bobby Marriott, 223 Lilac Lane, offered the same concerns mention in the rezoning case (ZA 93-26) * Bruce McCombs, 280 Lilac Lane, concerned about lot size consistency, variable R.O.W. on Lilac Lane, and increased traffic on Lilac Lane and Pine Street. P & Z ACTION: June 3, 1993; Approved (5-1) subject to the May 28, 1993 Plat Review Summary dated May 28, 1993, deleting item #3 (street stubout to the East) and amending item #5 to allow 20' side yards on Lots 1 and 27, Block 1 and Lot 28, Block 2 and to allow a 25' side yard on Lot 1, Block 2. The applicant is to show the fill area of the pond on Lots 24 and 25, Block 2 on the west property line. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the second Plat Review Summary dated June 11, 1993 . /60j/ KPG • C:\CD\KAREN\MEMO\ZA93-25.MEM g ,D-/ ';m E\ . , ti 5.-' tc e t.... '• .- a r ,:,.....410 . ..----.71--7. 2 .741pliper . . x mi Ka ,f:i\c m am x 2 4 40 iiPairricsiii° ?,_,,,,_hankg....:. , Ail ,, ., 1,3 tol 411.11100%al Pe As■-'' wir 41 ��j k 1 .sit 1.444 ,,BA1iti,=ata & $$tui._ lir�•��ENE a . i `=;,,; •• t `iwrw eft Illirlilpr, O EDI H W. KNIGHT ' ��.,'"+�; ' ` " YyP'- __ .1- �mwt.....r. r I xpAii .• i 1\ _ IL IC • r.,.J. HYDE `• t Alal* MIt ,.. k ... Arno. _ _ u x 1 . - -,..,,A1.1.1.41 IIIIIIPM IA W t men mmn e.a taw - PS r = _ I I • L. WM..!). x - p 311 , 2 I u 1• • rr' ' � �� ! ��■ i . FALL 4EDLWI FOLLIGmSWO,TH -1 . Rater�� (---.- 0 61 .P4 1 I ql;IffilffriNi fillii: \ BA i I,! 1--- / infizN AG6 , w xI• r : Sj�11j�11.42 0 I •/1 �' r E j \: 00 K3 : x gr trn x Di---7 t \ - i w ' ' 4„ a le Iff I � uu ,,�'�� 1 �+ p4y �rrA041? P� A, ' W.v. DAVENPORT • ' t n f 1 \ ' r 1' w x --.1 --d t-- i i A VI r MI — el' ‘ 1 1 , TRACT LOCATION MAP S 8.1) -a Y TR„I 3g9��GPEEK 7- f0 .0K r 1 TR 30f A .SBi .SBA 1 296�....• `. . C•, - -•I .. TR 282 /1 A/ - C7 U 1 -_i " - w 20.09 AC P . iG / 1 0'c iSI(WILL WILLIAMS AAE l.C�/ .AG. 'AG' E TR 6 y 1.96 0 a EC I .R 281 )1 1 TR 20 I TR 203A I 0- I .0 AC SLA� 1C2 4 5.1 AC 2.33 AC - > A� •IOOMFA I U I 1 2 13 14 ) NIGµTN U STEVENS MCCOMBS C IC Oo• I- - sF•Ti I b.BOA m LILAC d I I LILAC LN 1 w w OA .. . / /..,_„----._._-.�'.��..��\\ 1 1 L .A5 i AC LP E' A6 39 2 TRf 2C2A TR 2C14 • i• A. TR 2C T 2C3 1 • ,7,0 AC 2c2 13.15 AC 0 AC •• 3.R SA AC !0. C 17.15 AC)11.0 AC) I r i MARRIO7T . MOIRE LAND OEV.CON. Ciiiii) I • 0 O G00 22 4 21. 20. 16 . 18 L 17 II 16 TA K • .A QY - i 23 . 2 . MO:L LAND CCORP.� .22 AC C A MOBIL LAND CORD: r .• SILVERW000 CIA 15 (�V :5133 I 32 3 24 I w . 3• t- P. t�.I 5 6 7 • B _ 9 SA .79 AC -{ yCZ 31 ! A . ,' 25 7- 1 I 6§ sM TR BE 35 997� Al I A. 1 1 / A • c 1 •o�i �agA • r • w6 �� 2 �S F y ' i • m L ' '7 11..2, ' - 27 SILVEgy As4o`f• I •'° I D00 CIq „ TR SC1 - 2.05 AC - ,0.MOBIL:ND CORP.I 29 3 - .4. #411111PI:1*.COmm...0145SRFN 2 r, 11111 O'O 41\)) "'11 M081L WND CORD• , �11�I IIIAAA TR BE1 C((' 3.57 0 30 V Vc.' 10 L c I ` a `CI•LOV`ELACE AT !1 �(' �� 0•CJ Paegg I 39 •P.U.D: k 16Cg'� \y`) ql w I it w.. 1 % TRBE7 #41#549° 91 i 5.61 0 . MAs 1el= -TRACT • 22 7 �� �0 1R 19 MOBIL LAND CORP. -.1CN� I TRACT _ i 15 ...MD.' 6 TR BE - MOBIL LAND CORP. M I 20 21 ! 22. - AC t. jI A SA - GLENROSI C7- i ♦ ,. I ii AA A3 \\-..... .I �.)� 13 s 12 S1'L�BBEEE777�O�{{{ MI > iR3CT I is, _ . - . 1 p L.� ,� 1 3 I OAKCREST CT >< 1808FLAND CO:P. cc `f.\ •`.`l Y s 2 131. A 5 15 2'.. •5 0. .` i HIGHLAND OAKS CIR A7 /1 t �_./•'\=OA006 GREEN 1 1�Af U / 49LVLn — — _ _ _ — — _� _ _ __ _ r. I ` Ill 3CIA .,, .. \ .32 I �- ] , d — TR 3C34• _\ • .. l E i TR 3CC1 TR 3C1 1.03 0' 1�^� 1.46 @ _ 1.s0 B \J MOBIL LAND CORP. . ADJA ENT OWNER S & ZONING F F : fir: £ i;S;ziri_;i?i3a: iiiii... ;si City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 93-25 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 6/11/93 PROJECT NAME: Preliminary Plat - The Dominion OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: J.B.M. Development Corporation Goodwin & Marshall, Inc. 1905 Industrial Blvd. 6001 Bridge St . Colleyville, Texas 76034 Suite 100 Fort Worth, Texas 76112 PHONE: (817) 329-8381 PHONE: (817) 429-4373 FAX: FAX: (817) 446-3116 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/7/93 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS. OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . 1. The subdivision ordinance requires that street stubs be provided into adjacent property at a minimum of 1000 feet (1000' ) apart, Staff recommends a street stub between Lots 15 & 16, Block 1. 2 . The following corner lots are required to have a 35' building line along both property lines adjacent to the streets : Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 27, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 Lot 28, Block 2 * Lot 26, Block 1 and Lot 5, Block 2 have provided the typical 5' reduction on the side yard for a reverse frontage lot . * Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial, they appear to meet the intent of this requirement . * Denotes Informational Comment cc: J.B.M. Development Corporation Goodwin & Marshall, Inc, . . Lt ZONED 3F-I ZONED AO , 2..:..,,. ii472•74.!..:.::::COON 11,-'rl II ILLOT s2cti 7,11.'N ZONED ND No.1 ..s. 460.01 V. P D.L.MARRIOTT Vols..WO.Pep Pal :I 11$°14,91?114‘' ,c. Il / , 71 liA ON De'' 7IMAJIROlf D.R.F.C.F. 1•jr , ,..--- .5.93 OKI 5 CTION ONE 141)."- ...' SO II. h I I LOT.3 •--. 1 BLOCK A tall".A. Ns.WA E.Dr1•1 L OVELACE 14 .,. r±::;;:99,....2.s,. _.... _ff ...s „...."„i..0......1”7- N.7.:74........0008.4,,1.3........4.r.,.,..:..T... ,- E.•,i°. _gm Iliwnt-TOM ALM> 11 III / MUD 0:1 lg'IAN0:0::.":18:1M"'.".....'...."..":\ .. Pi N•7EID:C.!54 (2.153e46,92 6 b, 12 OP 1/ \ r ..'„21‘ - PlOINNIN •-• \\ v4.k..a..2.11.,:p.--,WI. ,,i , _JOX.T0'27- 8 . / .2..t.. 1.. _,pL -:,,,i' .-. . ,..„':-W'j..-7 : 1- as. - ,. -nr".,2'' -=,r.... ,.;'. ... k I e.••-l ii- ,,,,...-,....-. . ' I or -He-.. '''L.----I ---/ I I ..... ZONED MIL „"' f r I If"---..,,,,e al - • ''ki ., ..1, . I!,V. ', ' '"''''•••• 1,1 7 4 . ...'1' ilyl• ' Am sp. 41 j '„14.*,,, ".4.' 0 ', \ q'is://..•, .,, t „.‘ _ , . 1 • 1 ,-.- : h .r....____,,•• •• 44.4., ,.1 4V..::,e0,,,,/,,4 P A', •• 9 1. so r L. t /( zar4r 4s. , 18 14 .5. 4 . k p; OW 20 LI i, •, __ 1110,0•P L"D STIPP;',A7 -- 2r----1.' _Le RD' De it 1 :- `•:‘'4 __If ",'I 24.;. :' i''.. 1. .,.m... 4111-.4.°Aft l' r'"ior k 1 5 iir.-.44 :Z, A .._ - ,•I -2° i..1.1.,. . ,ti i • -77->< d's'•i sr lc 5 I z. ....„....., , ,vii5ri......_,41 . , ,.. ,I. .Z.'111' . , +,-......, ' ' •uoiL..m. 22 !4 1 ,.1 -26• 94' r1ittlitAi .. . s II *"1.." 4 ..*-.. . • h r. .._ .--, .• .• c'. it; .11 :lb,.,,.- al,„ i'r ,gorp-1/4,'0 p or L.. ,...p.ii uar_77..... .ONO ----r-- 0- - '410 ' A ,..-- • .. ' 24 50..i:51..:0,::i.. ' ,-- -.4.Z•ITA ,?. 3 ;:: 6, r„..4,., '0 ' '24:401.:-.--- .404)- . ,• ,......siii....1„1_,,,,.......,„ - --..\..... -4., ____ j. ; !II . Atile..q mar... 7 k 1 1 I II ZONED ' M-2. 4. IS - 24.4•414‘ AG ror--;._ I''"'"'-'_.' J\C!. 411...., .0*.IIP. , i - , is ..4f .;44444 • r. 01'10'33'E 504.29' ' i MARION O.MgC01165 Jo •L Vot 6667.Pg.858 I 114 'g. lt .. '- •..'“' 1 ' • .------FW roP o..-1•.,c°N. 12 •10,, ? ' i a. .- ,•-.4,..- .,9: r ik I I. .. le . D.R.T.C.T. 0 • ' ., .. a 14 K10 LA'1''.''''' ' ''' "UV. ANS ' ", 3:: .1 „= . ••, :<, "''''''' ° •.zu ° - , .ts, .i. DEA111 CREST COMMVIVITIES . . '5.- 1 rfi ' sr AA kj, 1 1161a0 _41- .. ,.,,,,. OCK 1 59 TN oll LA11635. .7, V.15.a ... " esTA! 41 II ZONED PCID No..1 480-01.4 C, i I. • ,.g..144. 71 1 \ I IA 4 D O01111rIr ()Ago' ° rilAss I ..,7I o o.,...,. 51 NOTE: /k_ gill I 45 6 14 \1 i; ' % '' Plasma pptt.i..c.f. 1.LANDSCAPE EASEMENTS ARE PRIVATE EASEMENTS OVINF_D AID MAINTANED BY 11 I THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCATDPI OF 'THE DOMINON.' 3 I 2.CONDON GREEN AREAS ARE PRIVATE AREAS OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ALI +11 46 42 . ASSOCIATION OF'THE DOMINION: E'z 01 . 3.A 10 FOOT.LEVEL lir BUFFERYARD WLL 1.?. til. BE PROVIDED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY e , copluurnoLA:T:Tv=0,111,4VAA.C:Ax.T0E,D;Rlyr UNE ADJACENT TO CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD. _ 611 43 LRIPTION SITE DATA COAL DESC . GROSS ACREAGE 38.514 ACRES Al'Ilk 77.:,Ityr:r.:114.t::::,•.-..41111:::::=1:7"atir:Lti:v7 MINIS NOHT-OF-WAY 0.446 ACRES P'A 04000 Tam col loly Iwo p./00 4•016•1 NET ACREAOE 36060 ACRES PROPOSED NO.DWELLING UNITS 55 LOTS DENSITY 444 U/A Nli OPEN SPACE 2.69 ACRES - A.,.1 MI,th•Soo..tool.ol tR•1••••4.4.1.1.1,...."". EXISTING 20NINO 'AG' EXISTING LAND USE AGRICULTURAL 040I/I war,E.21,itt.,[1.••tOrr..;Mats 0..8:::11:ts,TIVIaltt., PROPOSED LAND USE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL o 50 00 Et CITY LARD USE PLAN MEDIUM 5 LOW DENSITY RESDENTIAL ALL ONSITE Examto STRUCTURES SCALE:r-my ME TO RE MIMED roTo;1•41?:S001:3::.:$:1":/i;:::/%•...:orle7.2,5:474.1SSo:F:.:L.t'LIT UNLESS IITNERNIIE NOTED. ., . R• I. .11111111 I.••AT;1•14losa•lio t.t...r.011/40.01 noo.•••.3.r..1 r..ve In4 0.N.• OWNER: 110SCII•o•WWI./..,LI.lam 4.30J3 fooi fo•WY Nos.Y.too•R City of JEN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ifiAll 1 r.7...":24:111.t.g.t/Pte3 rwVo!':4 V.Z.17:r.;:lri::27,::::.'tir7;11::i:..7".• 1905%MISTRIAL BOULEVARD COLLEYVILLE.TEXAS 76034 PISTILTRIINART PLAT . Tent a zaloor E A.,As TDoi 6••of••111 tow Crook 6••••.11••trod!.013..4 loot to i 6I7 I 329-8381 THE DOMINION = = . •I,Irage ell fr.. .11n6.1441;aLf olos,A*Poo tt•OPENT.KO to.b of•01 Sow GooI Coomoliio.trot,304.0 low Is tarn,PPPPP PHD IV .. .. cot Ili OSIK6 II.arEt7r,so,o,4..E...e,Moo•f will low 6,11 tsar.Ine•1_34.61 loot to• 31.314 AC.R133 ‘ ,. 2:::»:.-4,•Ji:•...t."474;g:,17.1.:::::=1:1"M•1270..,.. GOOD WIN 1 Of 6•• .„-.91.111". Oat Hooral•of Toy.Coo.,P ...P.rg.1t.0.1:,3440.;6!nth.Vaal 6o el ooldl Ray.Cm."60•01.”N.fo•t lo•Yr UAIRSIHIALL1 0. W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899 S‘).LI r I 1 ri.1 k.• CM.MOMS-MOKPO.SERVITORS 636.1.43%IV us TIONITT W MP .Ute"."?.174ist4:7=1 ii.t.r...47:rti".11:11a".:L=.1.en. WM e.Me.ertaa Sig.I*%TOM Tama ors CITY OP SOUTHLAKR.TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS i . , zrit727.17.1:1=1:::;zir.tr.g,:7-1:7;:zont.:".•=,"#-' .....inm...... ......_• , ____. ...,.., i EXISTING ZONING'AG' 55 LOTS PROPOSED ZONING-SF-20A CASE NO.ZA 93-25 0 . .......,_ 1..-%'?_1'.--.....,.*-:".,:,%.2.2L:'?"...2.'26r?...Z.,±7-A.',Tie5,-E.2r"YtL,... City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 10, 1993 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 93-36, Appointments to Planning and Zoning Commission. This Resolution was tabled during the City Council meeting held on May 4, 1993 , in order for Councilmembers to have time to contact applicants, prior to the appointments. The Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI concerns Planning and Zoning Commission. It states there are seven (7) members on the Commission, and they serve two (2) year terms. Currently there are three (3) expired terms on the board, that will need to be filled. The terms of Robert Dowdy, Dennis McGrath, and Nick McGarity have expired. I wrote letters to the members and ask them to respond if they would like to be considered for another term on the board. I have received letters from Nick McGarity and Dennis McGrath. Robert Dowdy felt he traveled often, and that it was not fair for him to fill a place on the board and not be able to commit to being there for the meetings. I have attached the applications I have on file for your review. If you have questions, please get me know. sl City of Southiake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 93-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Home Rule Charter of the City of Southiake, Texas, was approved by the voters in a duly called Charter Election held on April 4 , 1987 ; and, WHEREAS, in the Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI concerns Planning and Zoning; and Section 11. 03 , allows for appointments for two (2) year terms on the commission; and, WHEREAS, currently the terms of three (3) commissioners have expired; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this Resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2 . The terms of Robert Dowdy, Dennis McGrath, and Nick McGarity have expired. Section 3 . The City Council hereby appoints the following persons to the Planning and Zoning Commission, to serve a term to expire in May, 1995: 1. 2 . 3 . Section 4 . This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 1993 . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: GARY FICKES, MAYOR ATTEST: SANDRA L. LEGRAND CITY SECRETARY fill 1.1 Ir r05- n' �W Mikie and Nick McGarity �` &we � ��� FEB 2 2 1993 '.. 10 OFFICE OF CITY SECRETAR February 19, 1993 Ms. Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Reappointment to Planning and Zoning Commission Dear Sandy: I have enjoyed my experience over the past year with the Planning and Zoning Commission. And, I remain committed to assisting in Southlake's orderly and quality development. 1 During my tenure, I have not missed any Planning and Zoning meetings. Although I have contributed a great deal to-date, I feel that I am still learning and have more to offer. •{ I feel that my reappointment for a full term would make me more effective and be a benefit to the City. Therefore, please apprise the City Council that I would be honored to serve another term with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Sincerely, (11:///...141( f; • Nick McGarity • f 1 0 , 114 1101 East Northwest Parkway, Suite 110 Southlake,Texas 76092 11 ®.M�s �-3 (817)329-3500 Each Office Independently Owned and Operated q gIVAF `•rli Wy"y'U M AY Q 1993 Mrs. Sandy LeGrand (jFr1C `'" May 1 , 1993 City Secretary cyrK SECBETARV City of Southlake Dear Sandy • Please convey to the city council my wishes to be reappointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission. I have enjoyed my tenure on the Planning and Zoning Commission and feel I have served the citizens of Southlake very well in this capacity. I do look forward to continue on the Planning and Zoning Commision. Sincerely, ��e- • Dennis McGrath 9a' _ y • vt� rsw APR 211993 ag CITY OF SOUTHLAKE OFFICE OF CITY SECRETARY. APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board, commission, or committee) : Z (use a separate application for each appointment desired) Name: wQ� Address: l a o n Home Phone: 4 $ i - 3 4-4 cs Years in City: �J Phone: Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: „. Z -n� Pr Pc2.o.�.,. 2� ,.Ctz -.- Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee , and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same; C.1- CI,.., �.� : �-- ,..�, B ,o �o..��, 9• , �n �� . Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: 13 crQ- 1� �� P '- `J-' ='�, Z�'.A, -&.0 ,-),Q, r"J cwr— , • Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? - Additional information or comments: Please return this completed form to the City Secretary' s Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature : '�^�� �- Date : 4- " C3l - q 3 qa, -s DEC: 1 'S'"; ROM EXTERNi L COMM PAGE . 001 DEC 2 81992 Post-It-brand fax transmittal memo 7671 xof pages P / 4 From Kt -6 �'Tol7z4 rc4. LL G,.,.,„_ Kate OFFICE OF cu..0 Co- SECRETARY CITY OF SOU Crri• Dept e; s,,24 J_ phone91,k 5 .a f-aa.r o Fax a Fax# .5 c ='7��'6 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: Li F: - ��.�(d �' Committee) : PLANNING AND ZONING . use a separate application for each appointment desi ecdJ Name: _ KATHRYN. ,(KKTF) f-s RARI 41A1 AddresS:_05 TRUFLOVF TRATI SfIIIHI P .E Home Phone: 488-2761 Years in City: 1 employer: BOY .Srfll l`[S.(1F A}�FR T('J1_=: '_ phone., - 21 '� a_-_5.80.-2270 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: serve on nei ghorhood committee Reasons for desiring to serve or' this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose , goals, and duties of same: hold Masters De • and would love to et involved to help t le community ' ensure overall consistent2. 1ong-"terra ctr5n t r - re rowt Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: Masters degree from - , - * have worked in high growth industry * hold strong, family values that„s.uide decision.-.0441ap and roncPro for others -- Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? YES. . Additional information or corn nents: B personal involvement throw hout academic career munication - skills that I feel would benefit a city that vill experience dram • coming-years Please return this completed form to the City Secretary' s Office. Each application will - be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature: Gam.. 6 t,J Date: / /i7/92. C7n_ - 6 • SNOW MAY 17 1993 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE OFFICE OF CITY SECRET APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board, commission, or committee) : (use a separate application for each appointment desired) • Name: ,ZGt G✓✓ (Z u v-7 z v� Address: /,.„4 // '% 4 e (.> v J % Rome Phone: ,/ /� ' S. Years in City: 1/ ,_2 Employer: j��� Phone: /k/ 1 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: /'1 7 _l ,•74" Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee , and your opinion as to the purpose , goals, and duties of same: j c � Q � � -: . Cn r G > �. / ,C 7 /�/ C� `-i`J `� !� �- ,� -mil r�,` _-� ..� ._�; ,� 7 C✓�� j� ,4 r Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: ,VeJ ; ��-� � .�-. c /S 41 '1 '/4-4 = s !�.4��e-,�. sue, c-c" O v, o`" cT z� i74J w ) f/ �_. Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? ' �f Additional information or comments Please return this completed form to the City Secretar y' s Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signatures- � .zf..--�- Date : 5,../�/, (1.52 9C1, �7 4 Y JAN 2119 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE OFFICE OF CITY SECRETAR L APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board, commission, or committee) : 1)?N411i✓g d ZclA✓i�J j (o`21 mc c570�0 use a separate application for each appointment desired) Name: ✓4 IES if " OSc J Address: /�29/ ca e(gC�E ` -Co(2771 LA/CE f 7X 7e O 9 a Home Phone: cf/7) y,pg- 7c2 fly Years in City: 02 Employer: L/ iTLE7-o.v Cc Phone: (7/7) (3e/-S5 77 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: NONE Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: J C,a t/ ( - p4ece4,4 1;cm e-i• 7.dL .4714.41 tet( .41-4.44.d.."-' 6-e- 44..4 C 7 721, �.e�=� do el, e2-,.I -4.44 a.Etrw ot. Qualifications and experiendee that would assist you in serving in this position: a-.- et_rie.tc..ti 7:e•-ya, A) ar_44-t.z.z• .-/G . a.bC cc t a a �-F nrtiZiJ • • Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? YES Additional information or comments: ,c1 G1.,a fr? c Z 4.kniG . // _ a4i-( a G7 a„.1 (7,424, zio 6r Q �� � - ►P Please return this completed form to the City Secretary' s Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature : Date: r 6'9- FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLe Carvan E. Adkins ATTORNEYS • ECMN Susan S.Jones Robert M. Allibon ATRIUM CENTRE • D Wayne IC Olson Daniel R. Barrett' 8851 HIGHWAY 80 W STE 300 Tim G. Sralla•• Elizabeth Elam FORT WORTH TX 76 1 16-604 1 inl fl in��7 i j J. Mark Sudderth David Fielding TELEPHONE (817) 560-0303 JU — 14 ? ;L i. Allen Taylor.Jr. Josephine Garrett FAX (817) 560-3953 `` c.,. 4 James P. Wagner E. Glenn Gidel 1 _ g 'Wendy R. Wilson Dwayne D. Hitt i OF ricr_ ()F CITY Cbmaleslie Muncy Susan H. Holloway f': "'" `' -ol Counsel 'Board Certified Personal Injury Trial Law— **Board Certified Civil Appellate Law— Texas Board of Legal Specialization Texas Board of Legal Specialization Civil Trial Specialist— National Board of Trial Advocacy June 3 , 1993 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Needed Action Regarding New Cable Television Regulations. Dear Curtis: The FCC has released its new rules concerning local regulation of cable television rates charged to subscribers for the basic service tier. Under the structure of these rules, unless the city takes the initiative to regulate basic service rates, they will go unregulated. If for no other reason than self-defense, it is imperative that you regulate these rates. If some cities regulate and others do not, you can be sure that those who do not will experience higher rates as cable operators seek available sources of revenue. Quick Action Is Important There is also very good reason to act expeditiously. Currently rates are under a federal freeze which lasts until August 3 , 1993 . If a city has not completed its certification process and adopted regulations by that date, cable operators will be free to increase rates at their discretion. This is significant because when the city does begin regulation, it will be required to deal with the rates as they are at that time. During the initial rate regulation period, a city will be able to reduce rates, but only to a benchmark level set by the FCC or by 10% , whichever produces a higher rate. As you can see, under this process it would be very beneficial to a cable operator to increase rates at the first opportunity. If rates are raised high enough, an operator can assure a rate above the benchmark even after regulation is activated. Equipment and Installation Charges By activating regulation, a city will also control the price and the manner in which cable operator's charge for installation and equipment. These charges will have to be made on a cost basis. ge• -/ e Without city regulation, operator's may continue their current practice of inflated charges. City Certification To obtain certification from the FCC before August 3 , 1993 , cities must be ready to submit their applications on June 21, 1993 , when the FCC is scheduled to begin receiving them. The certification becomes effective 30 days later if the FCC does not object. When certification is effective, regulation will still not be activated until the city has adopted regulations. The city may work on its regulations during July while the FCC is considering the application for certification. Non-Basic Rates The FCC retains jurisdiction to regulate rates for non-basic services; however, the FCC will undertake this regulation only if requested by a local authority or a citizen. As part of the total protection of cable subscribers, it is essential that non-basic rates also be regulated. Otherwise the operator will be free to increase those rates to offset any savings the subscribers may realize from the regulation of basic rates. Thus, the city should request this regulation from the FCC. Draft Resolution Enclosed is a draft resolution authorizing the city manager to submit an application to the FCC for certification and request FCC regulation of non-basic rates. This needs to be adopted before June 21, 1993 , and sooner if possible. Our firm is currently working on regulations that can be used by all cities. You will have a draft in plenty of time for adoption before August 3 . In all probability, the regulatory process will not require a great deal of city staff time. The certification forms are simple and straight forward and the Cable Act puts the burden on the cable operator to provide the information and calculations. The city's function is mainly reviewing the submissions. Only if a cable operator submits a cost-of-service showing, will much staff effort be required. If you wish to schedule a briefing on this matter, please let me know. Sincerely, Analeslie Muncy 9zz City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 93-44 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FOR CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY TO REGULATE CABLE RATES FOR BASIC SERVICE AND TO REQUEST THE FCC TO REGULATE NON-BASIC CABLE RATES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC" ) has determined that rates charged subscribers for cable television service are excessive and in many cases unreasonable and pursuant to the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, has adopted rules establishing a process for local regulation of cable rates for basic service; and - , WHEREAS, in order to assure that the City' s citizens have the advantage of the new federal law and are required to pay only the most competitive rates for their cable television service; and WHEREAS, the City must act expeditiously to initiate its regulation of basic cable rates and to seek FCC regulation of other cable rates; NOW, THEREFORE, - BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the city manager is authorized to submit, at the earliest possible. time, an application to the FCC for certification of the City to regulate basic cable rates . In addition the city manager shall file with the FCC, a request that the FCC regulate non-basic cable rates . SECTION 2 . That this resolution shall take effect from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so resolved. RESOLVED AND PASSED this day , 1993 . Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand City Secretary b:Ord/Res/93-44.RES/kb City of Southlake,Texas CITY -MANAGER MEMORANDUM to_ - '`""o June 9, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: 1993 Land Use Plan Update Staff has made the changes to the Land Use Plan as requested by Councilmembers or Planning and Zoning Commissioners at the joint work session on May 25, 1993 . We will hand out the updated research notebooks at the Council Meeting. Staff will bring to the Council meeting the rendered full-size map with the modifications as requested. Upon final approval by Council, Staff will prepare and forward a full-size print of the 1993 L.U.P. to each Councilmember and Planning and Zoning Commissioner. Please place this on the next Council agenda for their consideration. GL/gj • /0z., City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 10, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E. , Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1, Jellico Circle Street and Drainage Improvements After the street and drainage improvements project on Jellico Circle was started and inclement weather was encountered, a decision was made to install the asphalt base over the wet and soft subgrade which allowed the residents access to their homes . This decision recognized the probable need to repair the asphalt base before project completion. If the decision had been made to not install the asphalt base until the subgrade was dry, we may still be waiting. Rone Engineering, the geotechnical consultant, Eddie Cheatham, City Engineer, and I met on Jellico Circle to review alternatives, resulting in Change Order No. 1, which will provide a solution to repair the failed sections, equal to the original design. To not make the repairs is not an option in my opinion, as the street maintenance costs will need to increase more than the cost of the change order. Therefore, I recommend the contract Change Order (Number 1) for Jellico Circle Street and Drainage Improvements in the amount of $24, 495 . 00 be approved. Funds are available in the Street Infrastructure account, 145/995 . 00 . Based upon the experience on the Jellico Circle project, we will be recommending more investigation of the subgrade (soils testing) , that drainage improvements be substantially complete before the street surface is removed, and look at the start dates to try and avoid the spring rains . 631-7///9 BW/lc Attachments : City Engineer letter Contract Change Order Rone Engineers letter c:\wpfiles\memos\jellico.Chg CHEATHAM AND JUN 91993 ASSOCIATES PI1RLIC WORKS fFPT. June 9, 1993 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Contract Change Order for Jellico Circle Street & Drainage Improvements City of Southlake Job No. 001-209 Dear Bob: Enclosed herewith is Contract Change Order No. 1 for the subject project. This change order is required due to the subgrade problems encountered during construction. As we have discussed previously, the subgrade failures were primarily the result of an unusual amount of ground water in the sub-base material. There are several factors which resulted in the sub-grade problems. The primary problem however was the lack of an adequate drainage system along the existing street, prior to construction. This was made considerably more detrimental due to the excessive rainfall which we experienced during construction. In addition, most all of the homes around the inside of the circle are above the street, and there is no sanitary sewer system in place. Therefore, the septic effluent assisted in saturating the sub-base material. Rone Engineers, the geotechnical consultant on the project, has determined that the subgrade itself was adequate for the street. The problem was that the material under the subgrade, the sub-base, was too wet and "pumped up" through the subgrade. Rone has addressed this in a letter, copy enclosed, for your convenience. There were several "pockets" of sub-base material which was particularly more of a problem then the rest. These areas are the places where the subgrade failed. Perhaps more prior soils testing could have identified these areas, and the problems could have been anticipated. On future projects we are going to recommend more soils testing. Also, any streets which the city plans to reconstruct in the future should have adequate drainage in place, and the work should not be scheduled during periods of heavy rainfall. If the area has poor drainage, and it is anticipated that the sub-base material is saturated, the project should be delayed until the material can dry out. • Once the project is started and the street is excavated, it is too late to wait for the material to dry out, due to the pressure from the public to get the street back into service. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • Suite 207 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1 23 • Metro 640-4329 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. June 9, 1993 City of Southlake Page 2 The contractor must be able to get in, complete the project, and get out to avoid having the street basically impassible for an extended period of time. This was basically the reason that the contractor was not required to continue to work with the sub-base material, in addition to the fact that it was raining about every 3-4 days and the sub-base could not dry out for several weeks. The change order is for the removal of the pavement and subgrade in the problem areas. A mat of geo-grid fabric will be placed under the subgrade, and the subgrade and HMAC pavement will be mixed and stabilized. This material (10 1/2" thick) will be placed and compacted over the geo-grid fabric and compacted in place. Then the entire street will be overlaid with the final 1 1/2" of surface course HMAC. There are approximately 1800 S.Y. of street which failed, but to assure a solid base for the geo-grid, it is recommended to expand out from the problem areas. This results in approximately 2450 S.Y. of material to be removed and recompacted, in addition, there are a few (4-5) small areas which are to be repaired. The total cost of the recommended repairs is estimated to be $16,500. In addition to this, there was $7,995 worth of base added to the subgrade during construction. This material was needed to allow for the construction equipment to work and not cause more problems due to the weight of the equipment. Therefore, the total of the contract change order is $24,495. After the street is finished, now that the drainage has also been addressed, it should be in good condition, and serve the residents well for many years. If you have any questions or comments, please give us a call. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \conchor.jcs Enclosures / 0ba 3 • No. 1 CHANGE ORDER Dated: 6/15/93 OWNER's Project No. N/A ENGINEER's Project No. 001-209 Project Jellico Circle OWNER City of Southlake Contract For Street & Drainage Improvements Contract Date: Feb. 10, 1993 • To: J.L. Bertram Construction & Engineering, Inc. Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract: Owner By Dated June 15 , 1993 Nature of the Changes: Excavate areas of base failure and stabilize subgrade and existing HMAC. Compact and overlay with HMAC. Enclosures: These changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time: Contract Price Prior to This Change Order $ 144,455.58 Net (Increase) (Decrease) Resulting from This Change Order $ 24,495.00 Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 168,950.58 NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B (1978 Edition) ®Pigelof2 b `I Contract Time Prior to This Change April 28, 1993 (Days or Date) Net (Increase) Resulting from This Change Order 90 (Days) Current Contract Time Including This Change Order July 28, 1993 (Days or Date) The Above Changes Are Approved: Cheatham& Associates Engineer By Date ,•` 414:2 , 1993 The Above Changes Are Accepted: • Contractor By Date , 1993 Page 2 of /Ob Un/Uaias 15::7U XXOL(U4UV000 nrninni¢ naav vela va .��••...•• c+v - Acme Engineers 11234 Goodnight Lane Tel_ (214) 241-4517 RoneEngineers Incorporated Dallas,TX 75229-3319 Metro (214) 263-1555 1=1111 Dallasfrort Worth/Nousnc 1 Fax(214) 241-5174 (800)243-8494 • May 21 1993P-171 '` IFIT CITY OF t n SOi3TUTASE ::,t c, a ! do Cheatham and Associates, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West, Suite 207 Arlington; Texas 76006 Attn: Mr. F ;P Cheatham, P.E. RE: SUBGRADE STAR1T1'ZATION JFLIC+O CIRCLE SOUTIMAKE, TEXAS Dear Mr. Cheatham: The fallowing responds to comments regarding subgrade stabili2ation criteria established by .Rone Engineers, Inc. in Report 2-593-01 dated June 24, 1992. These comments are prepared after a meeting with yourself at the Jelico Circle job site and with Mr_ Keyvan Ranjbaran, P.E. of Rone Twgineers, Inc. on May 18, 1993. Five exploration borings were drilled along Jelico Circle for the purpose of identifying subgrade son conditions. Of these five borings, two were noted to have sandy clay subgrade soils immediately below the very thin, two-inch existing asphalt surface while the remaining three borings contained sandy subgrade sons. Attetberg limits tests were performed on the predominately clay roar riaik to identify their general activity while;the sandy soils were known to have non-plastic to low plasticity characteristics. Readers should remember and note that no boring found the existing asphalt thickness greater than approximately 2 inches and no subgrade stabilization or base course material was encountered in any of the bore boles. The results of the investigation was the recommendation for asphalt or concrete pavement with subgrade stabilization using hydrated lime. Hydrated lime is considered the mom appropriate st bi1'7'ion agent knowing that relatively highly plastic clays occurred within the subgrade soils in certain reaches. Sand and sandy soils typically have a greater strength value in-situ,naturally, • Geoteohnical,Environmental, Remacl-ration,Water Resources,Subsurface Investigation and Budding Sciences Pcutessionals . /Ob .. . A City of South Lake • do Cheatham and Associates, Inc. May 21, 1993 Page 2 than the clay soils. Little to no research testing has been performed to establish the proper strength values that are appropriate for cement stabilized clay sods. These is no doubt that published literature is abundant with the positive effects of lime stabilization on clay soils. In addition,readers should tt.re"stanc t %;•; 'thg ninlivicerk,.tile-tifnely.minipulationicemiloaction of a cement stabilized material is of extreme importance to be done in a rapid time frame;however, lime stabilization can be performed and compaction may be achieved several days after completion of the stabilization process. Furthermore, should any density tests on lime stabilized soils be found to be below a standard for the project, these materials can be re-moisten and re-compaetel to get proper standards. Should cement stabilized materials not initially meet the density standards, they can not be pulverized, moistened, and re-compacted and still be allowed to maintain the same cementations qualities as would have been required for design. As a result, it was the judgement of Rone Engineers, Inc. that; for the overall project, lime would be the more appropriate stabiTiiafion agent. it is our understanding from information from Mr. Cheatham that the remaining streets of Post Oak Trail and Cypress Creek have been constructed using a simi'br standards and lime . stabilization during 1992 and result in very satisfactory conditions as of this date. Construction for Jelico Circle has transpired dining extremelY wet, rainy periods in which it is further our understanding that proper drainage has not been able to be maintained and water accumulation below subgrade sails has occurred. If water accumulates below stabilized zones of either cement or lime, these foundation soils are extremely weak and can not provide a proper foundation for the pavement Therefore, regardless of whether cement or lime had been used as the pavement subgrade stabilisation agent,problems would have occurred with the construction and life of this pavement due to the extreme wet subgrade conditions below the stabilized zone. In addition, the pavement section that is being constructed is one that is substandard to that recommended in Rone Engineers, Inc.report Rone Engineers io1 . . - - . -- . . . Utt/MI/2JJ 10..71 &Jul- v.v°vv.. • -- _____ _ ____ City of South T atie do Cheatham and Associate% Inc. May 21, 1993 Page 3 • During the life of the pavement,the primary traffic that causes the greatest impact on pavements will be garbage trucks, concrete trucks, or moving vans. It is understood that, from the viewpoint of maintaining services to the Jdico Circle community, garbage trucks have been allowed to traverse along the partiallY paved . This heavy traffic will cause the subgrade to fail rapidly as evidenced by the problems being encountered on site. It is recommended that further idon of subgrade moisture conditions be established to properly identify the most appropriate remediation technique. Items were discussed during our conversation on May l9, 1993 regarding future remediation.plans. Fruthermore, it is our opinion that Rone Engineers, Inc.'s original recommendations for the pavement and pavement stabilization are appropriate. It appears that the timing of construction is very unfortunate being in a wet period and that these ramifications have caused significant problems with subgrade mated:121s - We appreciate the oppor unity to identify our comments in this letter. Should questions arise on information contained herein, please contact us. Very truly yours, RONE EN6IN'FPAS, ]NC. CcAl MA. P.R. Vice President copies submitted: (1) GMJlksf • Rone Engineers 1 6 - � City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 10 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E. , Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Reconstruction of South Peytonville Road (South of High School to Continental Blvd. ) and Permission to Advertise for Bids for Drainage Improvements I would like to request that the City Council review their decision on constructing South Peytonville Road now that Tarrant County has decided not to participate in the reconstruction of the street in its present narrow and poorly drained condition. A request (copy attached) was made to Tarrant County based upon the City Council' s decision, requesting South Peytonville be reconstructed with the same alignment and right-of-way, as the first priority. The Commissioner has responded (receipt of letter expected by June 15) that the County is not agreeable to do South Peytonville Road without proper drainage. The City Council, at their March 30, 1993 and April 15, 1993 meeting, did discuss various alternative design sections for the street . [Attached are the memos from staff . ] Eddie Cheatham, City Engineer, has presented an additional alternative in his letter of June 10, 1993 (see attached) . This alternative would be to install curb and gutter on a 22' pavement, thereby, staying in the existing right-of-way and minimizing the number of trees to be removed, yet adequately conducting the storm water. [Details of this alternative will be presented to Council at their meeting on June 15, 1993 . ] The Council, in their deliberations, need to address two serious problems on South Peytonville. 1 . Adequate drainage - without which the "new" road will not have a useful service life. 2 . Roadside safety - Roadways need to be "forgiving" to the erroring prudent drivers . Narrow road surfaces need to have a greater "forgiving" shoulder than a wider pavement that has some room to maneuver built in. Trees, which are "un-forgiving" when impacted, adjacent to the pavement, where there are no shoulders, are not a prudent engineering design. /De-, Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Reconstruction of South Peytonville Road and Permission to Advertise for Bids for Drainage Improvements June 10 , 1993 Page 2 Which ever alternative is selected, there is need to install two culverts across South Peytonville and obtain drainage easements for the discharge from each culvert . To accomplish this first step in solving the drainage problem, the Council is requested to: 1 . Authorize Cheatham & Associates to revise the plans and specifications for the two culverts and associated drainage structures . 2 . Authorize the advertising and taking bids on the South Peytonville Culverts Project . 3 . Authorize Cheatham & Associates to prepare the necessary documents, legal descriptions, etc. , for the easements for discharge of the storm waters. 4 . Authorize the acquisition of the necessary drainage easements along South Peytonville. 5 . Authorize Cheatham & Associates to revise the plans and specifications for the approved South Peytonville Street improvements alternative. The schedule for the drainage and street improvements would be : 1993 Summer/Fall - Acquire easements and construct drainage improvements . 1994 Summer - Construct street improvements [Request County assistance] For your information, Tarrant County is scheduled to reconstruct Continental Boulevard, from South Carroll to South Kimball, starting in September 1993 . Please place this item on the Council' s June 15 agenda for their consideration and approval . If you have any questions, please contact me. 004/47) BW/lc Attachments : City' s request to Tarrant County City Engineer' s letter City staff' s memos to Council (March 30, 1993 and April 15, 1993) c:\npfiles\memos\peytonvl.BW /DC-.Z • - = City of Southlake ou a • May 24 , 1993 EEEEEEEEE Mayor: Mr. Bob Hampton Gary Fickes Commission Mayor Pro Tem: Precinct 3 , Tarrant County Jerry Farrier Northeast Government Complex 645 Grapevine, Texas 76054 Councilmembers: BarryK.Emerson Subject : 1992-93 Tarrant County Street Reconstruction W.Ralph Evans Stephen W.Apple Sr. Assistance Program Jon Michael Franks Andrew L.Wambsganss Dear Commission Hampton: City Manager: Thankyou foryourplanned assistance to the Cityof Curtis E.Hawk Southlake as expressed in your letter of March 24, 1993 CitySecretary: to City Manager, Curtis Hawk. In a recent conversation Sandra L.LeGrand with Ms . Jane Sanford, she has requested that a new letter of request be sent in order that an Interlocal Agreement could be drawn. Therefore, the City of Southlake requests County assistance on the following projects, in order of priority. I . South Peytonville . . . approximately 4, 000 feet of 22-foot wide collector street to be reconstructed after September 1993 . 2. Continental Blvd . . . approximately 5, 500 feet of 24-foot wide collector street to be reconstructed. The City' s original request for County assistance this year was for reconstruction of Continental Boulevard, however, since that time, the City Council decided at a regular scheduled meeting, to move their first priority to the reconstruction of South Peytonville, from south of FM 1709 (south of the section improved in 1992 by County forces) , south to Continental Avenue, a distance of approximately 4, 000 feet . The Council determined that South Peytonville should maintain its present width of 22-feet and respectfully requests the County to assist in the construction. The timing of the South Peytonville construction is critical as public schools are located at both ends of South Peytonville . Southlake' s City Engineer, Eddie Cheatham, has designed the street and drainage improvements . His optimistic estimate is for the drainage improvements (two culverts) to be completed by mid September, 1993 . 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 481-0036 te7e "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" Mr. Bob Hampton Precinct 3 , Tarrant County May 24, 1993, Page 2 Please let me know the status of this request or any further information you may need. Sincerely, Ro ert R. Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works RRW/lc c:\wpfiles\letters\county.93 /De-9 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES June 10, 1993 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. • Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Reconstruction of South Peytonville Road City of Southlake Job No. 001-212 Dear Bob: The City requested the County to consider paving Peytonville, as a second street this year. The response from Commissioner Bob Hampton was that he did not feel comfortable with paving that section of Peytonville, due to the existing narrow right-of-way and the lack of bar ditches. We have taken another look at Peytonville, and we are in the process of looking at an additional alternative, other than the ones previously presented to City Council. This alternative consist of constructing a concrete curb along both sides of roadway in lieu of bar ditches. This obviously will increase construction cost, due to the cost of curb and gutter, and there will be additional storm drain facilities required. However, we feel that this could be constructed within the existing right-of-way, but there will have to be some trees removed to build this section. This will not be a standard City curb and gutter street, and to get a 22-foot roadway, we would need to build a 26-foot "back-to-back" street, again, this will require removing several additional trees. We are in the process of analyzing this from a construction standpoint, and will have this alternative and cost estimate available to Council at the June 15, 1993 meeting. If you have any questions or comments, please give us a call. Respectfully, • - Eddie Cheatham, P.E. c:IwpfilesllenerslPeytonvl.EC ENGINEERS •PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • Suite 207 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 • Metro 640-4329 /o c City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM CI TY p AMA1GE R March 30 , 1993 �) TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell , Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Roadway Alignment for Peytonville Avenue, Beginning 1, 000 Feet South of FM 1709 to Continental Blvd. Upon Council' s request, alternatives to the originally proposed roadway alignment for South Peytonville Avenue, from 1, 000 feet south of FM 1709 (south of high school) to Continental Blvd. have been investigated. As a result, staff concludes that a roadway could be constructed which would result in fewer trees having to be removed. The City Engineer provided the following three (3) alternatives to consider. 1 . Construction of . a 24 ft . roadway with 4 ft . shoulders and barrow ditches on each side . The roadway was proposed to be constructed to the west and would require acquisition of 20 ft . of additional right-of-way. By staying away from the trees along the east right-of-way, most of those trees should not be affected by construction. However, several trees on the east side would have to be cut in order to construct the two proposed drainage culverts . A preliminary tree count • indicates that approximately 80 trees must be cut along the west side, and 18 along the east side, for a total of 98 trees to be removed. 2 . Construction of a 22 ft . wide roadway section with no shoulder, but barrow ditches along both sides for proper drainage . This alternative results in losing approximately 70 trees along the west side, and 8 trees along the east side for a total of 78 trees to be removed. 3 . Construction of a 20-21 ft . roadway which would meander to avoid trees when possible, no shoulders, and a minimal barrow ditch. This section would result in approximately 30 trees having to be cut along the west side and 8 trees cut along the east side, for a total of 381trees to be removed. Although this alternative results in the fewest trees having to be cut, the drainage would not be handled as well as in the other two proposals . This option also does not address the close proximity of the trees to the roadway. This is a current situation which is detriment to the heavy traffic which that road will bear. /De -6 Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Roadway Alignment for Peytonville Avenue March 30, 1993 Page 2 Because of the complexity of this question, please consider these three alternatives and staff will respond to the direction of the Council . Considering the three alternatives, staff finds the first or second alternative most responsive to the public needs . t3. BC/lc Attachment : City Engineer' s letter c:\wpfiles\memos\Peytovil_alg • /ce -- 7 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES March 30, 1993 Mr. Billy Campbell Acting Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Roadway Alignment for Peytonville Ave. from Carroll High School to Continental Blvd. City of Southlake Job No. 001-212 Dear Mr. Campbell: As per the request of the City Council, we have investigated alternatives to the originally proposed roadway section for S. Peytonville. As a result of this study, we have concluded that a roadway could be constructed which would result in fewer trees having to be removed. There were three sections considered. The first involved the construction of a 24 ft. roadway with 4 ft. shoulders and barrow ditches on each side. The roadway was proposed to be constructed to the west, and would require acquisition of 20 ft. of additional right-of-way. By staying away from the trees along the east right-of-way, most of those trees should not be affected by the construction. There will however be several trees on the east side which will have to be cut in order to construct the two proposed drainage culverts. A preliminary tree count indicates that approximately 80 trees must be cut along the west side, and 18 along the east side, for a total of 98 trees to be removed. As a second alternative, a section was proposed which is 22 ft. wide, with no shoulder, but does have barrow ditches along both sides for proper drainage. This results in losing approximately 70 trees along the west side, and 8 trees along the east side for a total of 78 trees having to be removed. The third alternative which was considered was a 20-21 ft. roadway which would meander to avoid trees when possible, no shoulder was considered, and a minimal barrow ditch was considered. This section would result in approximately 30 trees having to be cut along the west side, and 8 trees being removed along the east side for a total of 38 trees to be removed. Of course, the third alternative results in the fewest trees having to be cut, however, the drainage would not be handled as well. This section would also present the possibility of traffic accidents with trees being very close to the roadway. The first alternative seems to be the most reasonable purely from an engineering standpoint, however, the second alternative would probably function well and still save several trees. If you have any questions or comments, please give us a call. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \pcylon.ra ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1 170 Corporate Drive West • Suite 207 • Arlington, Texas 76(X)6 h 17/633--1023 • Metro 640-4329 ioc-- g • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM April 15 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Roadway Alignment for Peytonville Avenue, Beginning 1, 000 Feet South of FM 1709 to Continental Boulevard At the last Council meeting, three alternatives (list attached) for reconstructing the above mentioned section of Peytonville were presented by Eddie Cheatham, City Engineer, and discussed. The three alternatives were rejected and an investigation into the possibility of reconstructing Peytonville with basically the same alignment as currently exists was conducted by Mr. Cheatham. This option would postpone the widening of the road (no additional ROW acquired) and clearing of trees for several years . Attached is Mr. Cheatham' s letter describing this proposal for your review. Please consider this option and staff will respond to the direction offj the Council . i(s�• BC/lc Attachments : List of three previous reconstruction alternatives City Engineer' s letter c:\wpfiles\memos\pey altr.ceh /De-9 SUBJECT : Roadway Alignment for Peytonville Avenue, Beginning 1, 000 Feet South of FM 1709 to Continental Blvd. The City Engineer provided the following three (3) alternatives to consider at the April 6 , 1993 Council meeting. 1 . Construction of a 24 ft . roadway with 4 ft . shoulders and barrow ditches on each side . The roadway was proposed to be constructed to the west and would require acquisition of 20 ft . of additional right-of-way. By staying away from the trees along the east right-of-way, most of those trees should not be affected by construction. However, several trees on the east side would have to be cut in order to construct the two proposed drainage culverts . A preliminary tree count indicates that approximately 80 trees must be cut along the west side, and 18 along the east side, for a total of 98 trees to be removed. 2 . Construction of a 22 ft . wide roadway section with no shoulder, but barrow ditches along both sides for proper drainage . This alternative results in losing approximately 70 trees along the west side, and 8 trees along the east side for a total of 78 trees to be removed. 3 . Construction of a 20-21 ft . roadway which would meander to avoid trees when possible, no shoulders, and a minimal barrow ditch. This section would result in approximately 30 trees having to be cut along the west side and 8 trees cut along the east side, for a total of 38 trees to be removed. Although this alternative results in the fewest trees having to be cut, the drainage would not be handled as well as in the other two proposals . This option also does not address the close proximity of the trees to the roadway. This is a current situation which is detriment to the heavy traffic which that road will bear. / %—/o CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES April 14, 1993 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake Re: Peytonville Reconstruction - From High School to Continental Blvd. Dear Mr. Hawk: As you are aware, we have been analyzing various widths and alignments for the subject street. Originally a decision was made that since the right-of-way is very narrow, and the trees are so close to the roadway, that it would be best to acquire the right-of-way along the west side of the street for widening. Then, a street could be constructed with all the widening being done along the west side of the street. This would allow for adequate ditches to be constructed and save the better trees which are along the east side of the street. We have, upon the request of the City Council, investigated the possibility of not acquiring any additional right-of-way, and constructing a 21'-22' wide street. This can physically be done, and the street would basically be the same alignment as it currently exists. We would like to mention, however, that there would not be room for adequate ditches, even if some trees were cut. In addition, the trees would be so close the road that the tree roots would pose future problems such as pavement cracking. Therefore, we recommend that if the decision is made to construct a street within the existing right-of-way, that the street be built with 2" HMAC rather than 4", and the culverts be built as originally proposed. The 2" surface will be less expensive, and will not last as long, but perhaps it will last long enough for some of the additional right-of-way to be dedicated to the city as the adjoining property is platted, or replatted, along the west side. We recommend that the ditches be built as wide as possible and graded to the proposed culverts. This decision will obviously be postponing the widening of the road, and clearing of trees for several years to come. However, there will be some savings in the construction cost which can be used to construct a portion of another street in the city. A member of the street task force was contacted to discuss this matter. It was his opinion that the recommendation of the City Council, to build the best street possible within the existing right-of-way, would be supported by him. He also agreed, that the street should be ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1 170 Corporate Drive West • Suite 207 • Arlington, Texas 76(06 K I7/(,33-1023 • Metro 6/10-4329 /Oc —// a "Type A" street, 4" HMAC. However, under the circumstances he felt that the street from the high school south to Continental, could be downgraded to a "Type B" street or 2" HMAC. If you have any questions or comments regarding this issue, please give me a call. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. • /0e —/z FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, L.L.P'. Carvan E. Adkins :\"ITORNEYS Susan S.Jones Robert M. AIIibon ATRIUM CENTRE Wayne i . Olson Daniel R. Barrett' 8851 HIGHWAY 80 W STE_ L5 llJJ Tim G. Sralle• Elizabeth Elam FORT WORTH TX 76116 "1! u J. Mark Sudderth David Fielding TELEPHONE (817) 560-030 E. Allen Taylor.Jr. Josephine Garrett FAX(817) 560-3953 JUN - 41993 Jam mesdy P. Wagner ilson E. Glenn Gidel Analeslie Muncv Dwayne D. Hitt -of Counsel Susan H. Holloway June 3 , 1993 OFFICE OF CITY MAP ER 'Board Certified Personal Injury Trial Law— me.te. ivil Appellate Law— Texas Board of Legal Specialization Texas Board of Legal Specialization Civil Trial Specialist— National Board of Trial Advocacyeq,54(6,,i Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager ',/ CE 6667 North Carroll Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: TU Electric Franchise Proposal Dear Curtis: Recently, you have probably received a proposed electric utility franchise amendment from TU Electric. They propose to increase your city's franchise fee to 4%. The rationale they use for doing this is that they have a commitment to fairness, and 4% is the rate paid to the City of Dallas. They propose bringing all cities to this level and making the increase effective June 1, 1993 , by giving a one-time payment of 1% of gross receipts during the city's last payment period prior to June 1 , 1993 . Before your city agrees to this amendment, there is information you should have. First, this proposal is not the equivalent of what TU Electric negotiated with Dallas. The following differences exist: (1) Dallas will receive a one-time prepayment in October, 1993 , of one quarter's full 4% franchise fee (a total of $4,000 ,000) . You are being offered a one-time payment of 1% based on one payment period. If your payment period is yearly or quarterly, the payment will vary accordingly. ( 2) The base on which the Dallas franchise fee is calculated is "gross receipts from the rendition of electric light, heat, power, and other services , within the city, but not to include the gross receipts from the sale of electric power and energy to other electric utilities for resale. " The franchise amendment sent to you uses as a base for the calculation of the franchise fee, "gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the corporate limits of the city. " This is a smaller base. • ( 3 ) Dallas has agreed to waive reimbursement under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act during the 15 year term of the franchise, for an amount up to the amount of the one-time payment to be received from TU Electric in / ! a -/ October. You are being asked to waive reimbursement, not up to the amount of the one-time payment your city will receive, but up to the amount of the one-time payment the City of Dallas will receive, $4,000 ,000. (You will recall that Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act requires utilities to reimburse cities for expenses in contesting rate cases. In the past, cities have joined together in a committee to avoid excessive expense in representing municipal interests. Cities have been required to put only a small portion of the money up front, because TU Electric has paid these expenses as the case progressed. ) Your city council should be briefed in order to fully understand the ramifications of agreeing to this franchise amendment. In addition, if you are being asked to extend your city's term by 15 years, there may be other provisions in your franchise which need updating. If so, those matters should be negotiated at the same time. I am enclosing a copy of the TU Electric franchise proposal with suggested changes redlined. These changes would have the effect of making the proposal resemble more closely the franchise agreement TU Electric now has with Dallas. I have also enclosed an additional suggested amendment that would give more balance to the franchise by requiring TU Electric to make reasonable efforts to limit its own expenditures on rate cases and to agree not to lobby for a surcharge or allocation of any city expenses it must pay. Since all customer cities are facing this issue at the same time, cooperation among the cities may be beneficial. I will be discussing these draft changes with TU Electric. Please let me have your comments, and let me know if you would like your city council briefed. Sinc ely, ‘%; die • Analeslie Muncy // 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EXISTING FRANCHISE BETWEEN THE CITY AND TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY TO PROVIDE FOR A DIFFERENTj, lW EXTENDING THE TERM OF SAID EXISTING FRANCHISE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ACCEPTANCE BY TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; A Nil DEG A RINGAN WHEREAS, Texas Utilities Electric Company (hereinafter called "TU Electric") is engaged in the business of providing electric utility service within the City and is using the public streets, alleys, grounds and rights-of-ways within the City for that purpose under the terms of'���i�yii�iaii i ��., ►,• ,.,a: „ 1,e et„r^ a„l. oa >,. Fro ►. ,, 'W / ATM,/��/�j f anchisV of the City iitl ''���� jr ,and duly accepted by TU Electric; and WHEREAS, TU Electric has, pursuant to said franchise ordinance, been paying to the City a sum equal to hree percent (3%) of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the City for the rights and privileges set forth in said franchise ordinance and, in addition thereto, has reimbursed the City for its ratemaking expenses pursuant to Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act; and WHEREAS, the City and TU Electric desire to amend said franchise Ordinance to provide for a different consideration to consist of a sum equal to four percent (4%) of its gross receipts f- m thretail--saw-ef--el-ec-r-i-e-pewer- nd-energy within the City which different consideration includes, among other things, TU Electric's obligation to reimburse the City for its ratemaking and other regulatory expenses to be incurred by the City involving the regulation of TU Electric; NOW, THEREFORE, TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY FRANCHISE PAGE 1 / /a - 3 •R AF T BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY al , /1 OF THE CITY OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. The consideration payable by TU Electric for the rights and privileges granted to TU Electric by IST, th F hi ordinance he•etof.e d'ul sed of this City ;//i �ff //r �,� and duly accepted by TU Electric is hereby changed to be four percent (4%) of its gross receipts from the Ali /elf i//// %�iy i,� �i.�i,� V%� if 4 retail sale of leetric p nfl within the corporate limits of the City, V:i'/,� i/1�i, rico �r /��� i, � ffia' � i, / A /j //';r /a j si i or/�fa/ ff fff f said changed percentage to be applied to said gross receipts beginning on June 1, 1993, and being payable as specified in said franchise ordinance and based upon the same time periods as specified in said franchise ordinance and being payment for the said rights and privileges during the period specified in said franchise ordinance, said payment being in lieu of and shall be accepted as payment for all of TU Electric's obligations to pay municipal charges, fees rentals, pole rentals, wire taxes, inspection fees, easement taxes, franchise taxes, certain regulatory expenses under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act or any similar or successor law, or other charges and taxes of every kind, except ad valorem taxes, sales and use taxes, and special taxes and assessments for public improvements. SECTION 2. TU Electric shall make a one-time payment hereunder for the purpose of making the changed consideration as specified in Section 1 hereof effective on June 1, 1993, without altering the payment dates specified in rigs�fi'�/�P% sai-€14Fafvehise—er-din-aftee , said one-time payment being due and payable thirty (30) days after TU Electric's acceptance of this TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY FRANCHISE PAGE 2 //a - i is Iv* FT ordinance as provided in Section 6 hereof, and being a sum calculated as follows: (a) TU Electric shall determine the monthly average of its gross receipts from the r /// ./ j/ di /A Fetail-sal-e-ef-eleetric-pewer-anfl-energy within the City OW�i, i, AJ�IMff�i i, / g 4 during the period upon which the most recent franchise payment made to the City prior to June 1, 1993, was based; (b) the said monthly average of its said gross receipts shall be multiplied by 1% (0.01); and (c) the product so calculated shall be multiplied by the number of whole months from June 1, 1993, through the last day of the last month of the period for which the most recent franchise payment made to the City prior to June 1, 1993, was made. SECTION 3. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 1 hereof, if TU Electric files general rate cases and the City incurs cumulative expenses, otherwise reimbursable by TU Electric under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act or similar or successor law, in excess of-'��y ��� � '//// Qom., then in such event, TU Electric shall reimburse all of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with all general rate cases filed during the period ended fifteen (15) years from the effective date hereof in excess of" % 'fed said $n million. The term, "general rate case" as used in this Section means a rate case initiated by TU Electric in which it seeks to increase its rates charged to a substantial number of its customer classes in the City and elsewhere in its system and in which TU Electric's overall revenues are determined in setting such rates. City agrees to exercise reasonable best efforts, considering the facts and circumstances, to keep its expenses on average to under ',,iA warm ma �� � ommo 988�88 per general rate case. TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY FRANCHISE PAGE 3 //a ,AFiFT SECTION 4. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1 hereof, TU Electric will continue to reimburse the City's ratemaking expenses, if any, in connection with the appeal and any remand of Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 9300 that are otherwise reimbursable under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act, and will continue to reimburse the City's ratemaking expenses, if any, in connection with Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 11735 that are otherwise reimbursable under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act to the extent that said ratemaking expenses are incurred through the entry of the last action by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (i.e., the said Commission's order overruling the last motion for rehearing) in said Docket No. 11735; the City hereby agrees that any ratemaking expenses incurred in connection with said Docket No. 11735 that the City incurs on appeal of said order will be the City's sole responsibility and further agrees -- in the events that the City is a participant in the joint intervention of cities managed by the Steering Committee of TU Electric Service Area Cities intervening in Docket_No. 11735, that the City decides to continue to participate with the Steering Committee in such appeal of said order, and TU Electric is required to reimburse said Steering Committee for ratemaking expenses under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act that are incurred on appeal of said order in Docket No. 11735 - - to reimburse TU Electric the City's share of reimbursable expenses related to said appeal and owed by TU Electric to said Steering Committee determined by the methodology chosen by the said Steering Committee (the City to notify TU Electric of the method so chosen by the Steering Committee prior to the submission of an invoice by the Steering Committee for the payment by TU Electric of said reimbursable expenses related to said appeal). (Proposals made to some cities, but not all, contain the following section.) SECTION_ The said franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY FRANCHISE PACE 4 /4- body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric shall not terminate as provided therein, but the initial term of said franchise ordinance is hereby extended for a period of fifteen (15) years from and after the date on which said franchise ordinance would have otherwise terminated but for this extension. SECTION 5. In all respects, except as specifically and expressly amended by this ordinance; /// th-e—saiii—fran-ehise—efdin-anc-e—her-etefar-e—duly—passed—by—the governing body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms until said franchise ordinance terminates as provided therein. (This last phrase is included in proposals which do not contain a term extension.) SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its final passage and TU Electric's acceptance. TU Electric shall, within fifteen (15) days from the passage of this ordinance, file its written acceptance of this ordinance with the Office of the City Secretary in substantially the following form: _ To the Honorable Mayor and City Council: Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU Electric), acting by and through the undersigned authorized officer, hereby accepts, on this the day of , 1993, Ordinance No. amending the current franchise between the City and TU Electric. TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY By: SECTION 7. (This section is not needed.) It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 8. (This section needs to contain information from the city's charter or state law concerning adopting utility franchises.) An emergency exists necessitating the TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY FRANCHISE PAGE 5 //47 ;* AF ,_ this ord:.,a.,ce ., e 1,er b oa PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY 5 ;. OF THE CITY OF , TEXAS, this the day of , 1993. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY FRANCHISE PAGE 6 //4 - , IRAFT SUGGESTED ADDITION TO TU ELECTRIC'S FRANCHISE PROPOSAL Cities should seriously consider adding the following provisions to the proposed franchise amendment submitted by TU Electric. In the last rate case, TU Electric spent approximately $60 million. The coalition of cities spent approximately $3.5 million. TU Electric should be willing to limit its expenditures in consideration for the cities waiving their rights under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act. Cities also need to be assured that their citizens will not be surcharged for regulatory expenses that TU Electric does pay. SECTION _ (a) In consideration for the waiver by City of certain rights under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act, TU Electric agrees it shall: (1) not seek, cause, encourage, support nor lobby for any legislation, regulatory rule or order, or court order which seeks to cause the surcharge of any payment under this franchise or Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act or to allocate the regulatory expenses of any city for its participation in a general rate case; and (2) exercise reasonable best efforts, considering the facts and circumstances, to keep its expenses on average to under $12,000,000 per general rate case. (b) Should TU Electric, its employees, officers, stockholders, agents, lobbyists, contractors, political action committees, or trade associations engage in the actions described in (a)(1) above, or fail to make reasonable efforts to comply with (a)(2) above, Section 3 of this franchise shall become void, and TU Electric shall fully reimburse the City for regulatory expenses in accordance with Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act. //a -� -,J1L G ofArft tonTexas + JUN I 1993 City Offi of the City Attorney f OFFICE MTY )(v„ MANAGER May 28, 1993 TO: ALL CITIES SERVED BY TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY FROM: Jay B. Doegey, Chair of the Steering Committe of Texas Utilities Electric Service Area Cities SUBJECT: Report on the Meeting of Cities Served By Texas Utilities Electric Company Concerning TUEC's Proposed Franchise Amendment Affecting Street Use Charge and Rate Case Reimbursement On May '27, .1993 , a meeting of cities served by Texas Utilities Electric Company met to discuss a proposed franchise amendment distributed by TUEC. Representatives from approximately 50 cities attended the meeting in person, and a number of others contacted me so I would let them know the results of the meeting. 1 The TUEC proposal for franchise amendment was reviewed section by section, and various comments were made concerning their meaning. The franchise renewal efforts of various cities within the last six years was discussed and presentation was made describing Dallas' franchise renewal process. A number of flaws were identified in the proposed franchise, including restrictions on the definition of gross receipts, extension of current franchises for fifteen years, application of a $4 million rate case reimbursement threshold to every city regardless of size, and the lack of safeguards needed to assure cities TUEC would not undermine cities agreeing to the franchise amendment and those that do not. Dallas representatives described how the $4 million threshold in the Dallas agreement was a projection of that city's rate case expenses for four rate cases over the next fifteen years. This same threshold is used in all of the other proposed agreements regardless of the size of cities. In other words, the $4 million threshold is greatly disproportionate to any estimate of rate case expenses for cities smaller than Dallas (i.e. , every city in the service area) . The representatives present unanimously agreed to ask the Executive Committee of TU Electric Service Area Cities to formulate a cities' proposal for modifications to the TUEC 200 West Abram Street•Box 231 •Arlington,Texas 76004-0231•(817)459-6878•(Metro 817)265-3311 •FAX(817)459-6897 //a -A0 . All Texas Utilities Electric Company Cities _ May 28, 1993 • Page 2 franchise amendment and to meet with TUEC representatives to secure the desired modifications. The members also requested that all cities served by TUEC be notified of this effort so that they may be apprised of the shortcomings of the TUEC proposal and stand united in securing modifications to safeguard cities' interests. Cities are urged to delay action on TUEC's proposal so that cities can collectively be assured the interest of all cities are• safeguarded. Cities are cautioned not to share the negotiation strategy of cities with TUEC representatives. If you must tell TUEC representatives anything, the best strategy would be to tell them the cities believe the proposed franchise amendment is not the same agreement offered to Dallas, and needs to cure certain flaws and provide additional safeguards. • /4Y-// IniMMEM TUELECTRIC May 14, 1993 Louie P.Rhodes,Jr. Manager - Mr. Curtis Hawk Southlake City Manager 667 N. Carroll Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk: . As part of TU Electric's commitment to fairness to the cities it serves, the company plans to offer an additional 1% of its gross revenue from retail electricity sales for franchise payment to those cities that it currently pays 3%, to bring them to the level it compensates the City of Dallas. Prior to the merging of Texas Power & Light, Texas Electric Service, and Dallas Power & Light to form TU Electric, the City of Dallas was paid a 4% franchise fee, while the cities served by the other companies were paid 3%. The commitment was made at that time, that when the Dallas franchise was renegotiated, all of the TU Electric cities would be treated consistently. TU Electric has paid the City of Dallas 4% of its gross revenues from retail sales of electricity since the first franchise was granted in 1917 to form Dallas Power & Light, and that level not only represented payment for the use of the city streets and alleys for its facilities, but also served as payment for other permits and fees within the city with the exception of sales and ad valorem taxes. It also covered the expenses of the city's regulatory staff which took a very active role in the regulation of electric rates and services. The city's current regulatory responsibility is changed somewhat by the Public Utility Regulatory Act but is still reflected in the current franchise. The Public Utility Regulatory Act, which is the law governing both cities and the Public Utility Commission in Austin, provides for utilities to reimburse certain expenses to cities for the regulation of rates. In the future, reimbursement for these expenses will be covered by. the additional 1%, as it is in Dallas. Yours truly, itAX&. Sonny Rhodes //0_ -iz P.O.Box 1329 Grapevine,Texas 76051 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM June 10 , 1993 TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E . , Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Staff Recommendation for Additional Public Works Position (Project Engineer) In order to complete the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) , the bond projects, it is necessary to request an additional public works employee . Recommended is a Professional Engineer (P.E. ) to serve as the Project Engineer. This person would do the project management presently performed by Eddie Cheatham. Mr. Cheatham is in complete agreement with this recommendation. Mr. Cheatham and His staff could then concentrate on "engineering" and not on doing The management and coordination of multiple projects . There would not be a duplication of costs as Cheatham & Associates would not be providing the project management service. A Project Engineer would also provide support to the City for other projects and activities as well . Funding for the Project Engineer would come from the bond accounts, as engineering is an eligible expenditure of bond funds . And, as we would currently contract with Cheatham & Associates for this service, there should be no increase in overall expenditures to the bond funds . Therefore, staff requests that the City Council authorize the City Manager to proceed with the process to hire a "Project Engineer" for the Public Works Department . Attached is the proposed job description for the "Project Engineer, " stating in more detail the essential job functions to be performed. 3W/lc Attachment : Project Engineer job description A s :\wpfiles\:remos\project.eng / CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 6/9/93 PROJECT ENGINEER Department: Public Works Division: Public Works Administration Job Category: Operations FLSA Designation: Exempt Reports To: Public Works Director Basic Function: To coordinate the design, right-of-way/easement acquisition, surveying, utility relocations, construction, payments and other support activities for all Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). Essential Job Functions 1. Administration and review of the design of all CIP projects including, scheduling, surveying, design and status reports. Presents CIP plans to P/Z Commission for approval of compliance with requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 2. Administration and review of the right-of-way and easement acquisition process including, but not limited to, property owner negotiations, verification of legal descriptions and compliance to construction plans, property owner communications, City Council briefings, records and file maintenance as appropriate and status reports. 3. Coordinates with public utility companies all system improvements, expansions and maintenance projects. 4. Coordinates and consults with outside sources as appropriate during project development and construction, such as, Corps of Engineers, FEMA, TxDOT, NCTCOG, DFW Airport, Tarrant County, Texas Water Commission,etc. 5. Coordinates with appropriate organizations (local, state, federal, utilities, railroad, etc.) to obtain necessary permits. 6. Reviews and processes for payment vouchers for all phases of CIP projects as per the contract or as directed by supervisor including preparation and/or review of contractor pay requests, change orders, testing lab invoices and reports, final inspections and approval. 7. Maintain a project management system to monitor and report all phases of each CIP project. Utilizing project management computer systems as they become available. Page 1 //X-a. 8. Take project photos, maintain project logs and working files. 9. Assists in investigations of field conditions and provide assistance with inspections. 10. Continually update engineering related master plans to insure accurate mapping. 11. Assists in preparing a CIP for the City. 12. Perform research and cost estimates necessary to update the Impact Fee requirements. 13. Piepare and submit for action, design, construction standards, specifications, ordinance changes for safe and consistent development within the City. 14. Coordinate all surveying projects performed by consultants. Other Job Functions 1. Piepares. reviews and submits periodic reports on all assigned activities, projects and goals as assigned. 2. Receives. researches, and responds to citizens' inquiries and complaints. 3. Composes and prepares correspondence. 4. Assist City directors and superintendents in resolving any engineering related inquiries. 5. Participate in other duties as assigned by the Director of Public Works. Performance Qualifications Knowledge/Skills/Abilities Knowledge of: project management; standard civil engineering practice and principles in the areas of design, construction and materials; and the design and operation of a municipal infrastructure system. Skills to: operate standard word processing, spreadsheet, and engineering computer software. Page 2 // - 3 • Ability to: maintain effective working relationships; communicate effectively, both orally and in writing; make sound decisions in stressful situations; initiate and prioritize work under general supervision; work with multiple groups, both within and outside the organization; and manage multiple design and construction projects concurrently. Education/Experience/Training • Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, plus five years of related experience. • Masters Degree in Civil Engineering or Public Administration preferred. • Professional Engineer's registration in the State of Texas or ability to obtain within six months of hire date. • Or, any equivalent combination of experience and training which provides the required knowledge, skills, and abilities. Conditions of Employment • Appropriate Texas driver's license or available alternative means of transportation. • May be required to carry, push, pull, drag or hold objects weighing up to 50 pounds. • May inspect and be in hazardous areas, such as, road construction, trenches, and other construction areas. • May spend 25% of time outdoors on construction projects. • May require 50% of time meeting with various officials, citizens, contractors, and other departments. c:1 wpfiles Im emos I project.eng Page 3 //- i