Loading...
2003-02-20 CC work session CITY OF SOUTHLAKE C., CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION: February 20,2003 LOCATION: 1400,Main Street, Southiake,Texas 314 Floor Training Rooms in Town Hall TIME: 6:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.076 and 551.087. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. Executive Session may be held,under these exceptions, at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that a need arises for the City Council to seek advice from the City Attorney as a posted subject matter of this City Council meeting. 3. Discussion: Downtown District Regulations and modification to R PUD Zoning. 4. Meeting Adjourned. • CERTIFICATE I.hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at Town Hall, 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, February 14, 2003, at 6 00 p.m.;pursuant to the Texas Government Code,Chapter 551. goN,,,,,,us, A.t: a 4cweee I ca Lori Farwell v• .I • City Secretary ,� ,'4•• ** ,•••••��, If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs,please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 817-481-1519 and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. City Council Work Session February 20,2003 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SESSION SECTION 551.071 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY The City Council may conduct a private consultation with its attorney when the City Council seeks the advise of its attorney concerning any item on this agenda, about pending and contemplated litigations, or a settlement offer, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Board of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551. This includes the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects: 1. Hanson Aggregate Central,Inc.,vs. City of Southlake. October 2000. 2. City of Southlake vs. Timarron et.al. May 2001. 3. Oakmont Enterprises,Inc.,vs. City of Southlake, and Sabre, Inc. January 2002. 4. Leona and Raymond Fox vs. City of Southlake.April 2002. 5. David A. Gray vs. City of Southlake.April 2002. 6. City of Southlake vs. Pinnacle Integrated Technologies,Inc. September 2002. 7. Richard W.Hart vs. City of Southlake. September 2002. SECTION 551.072 DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property. • SECTION 551.073 DELIBERATION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate a negotiated contract for a prospective gift or donation to the City. SECTION 551.074 DELIBERATION REGARDING PERSONNEL MATTERS The City Council may deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation,reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and city boards and commission members. A complete list of the city boards and commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office. • SECTION 551.076 DELIBERATION REGARDING SECURITY DEVICES The City Council may deliberate the deployment, or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. SECTION 551.087 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS The City Council may discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information received from a business prospect that the city seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the city and which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or to deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect as described above. I Y l - - 4 A MN l ..i City of Southlake C Southlake Department of Planning MEMORANDUM February 14, 2003 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bruce Payne, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Discussion of proposed Downtown District regulations. REQUESTED ACTION: Review and discuss Ordinance 480-SS - proposed revisions to the Comprehensive Zoning ordinance pertaining to the creation of a "Downtown" Zoning District intended to be applied to Southlake Town Square NR-PUD APPLICANT: City initiated. BACKGROUND: At their regularly scheduled meeting on February 4, 2003, City Council requested a work session to be held on February 20,2003 to Cr discuss the proposed Downtown District regulations in concert with the Planned Unit Development district zoning text amendment. Attached with this memo is a comparison table which highlights the key differences between the proposed Downtown District and the existing Town Square NR-PUD. SUPPORTING Comparison table between NR-PUD regulations and proposed DOCUMENTS: Downtown District regulations k r' ca c CD o 0�, o q CI4, :~ � � a 00 -" a •5 ' O -C U Q O' ccd `n 4 go E c.s1 cis ~ ," O �bA >' O U 74 CL aj O , A C `n E. ' v� b O O b 00' O ... �+ v . U N >, y et C �" 0 O N > V N C a' c) •m s ' -0 4' b0" E •vi O U 0--0 a) 'S cn -d E ° ar � a oa a, kIC) o o �nN, 00 ° > 0 00 . a ,) 4Qa) o� . 3 cz0 �o -d a . ' O 0' a o , •. 0.) Qa' C 0 . '� 4, �O ry 6O y z ... V) • 0 cn > O 0. Q , A A v 0c1 O 'd r) E 'C 'C � .b a' NwO a � O t, O0 pc C 0 ,... Q, cn co y .sue , �, .,, Q s. -y..,. a' N a 0 0 A -d ,� ,b ,." cn4a r:. -dam - 3D o •00E Um o i a.43 ° N 3 Z •3 a) o O a' 0 �' a-' - 0. ' -C — 0 tv 'b E .2 .0 0 rn O co -C 04 Q.-C O G" cd •C > O A a' w 3 an a a' -' ' Ti >, 0 . O as •9 O 0 �i cl N W a) v Ga) c A . � N a) OU O C 0 cr)�, 1:j 'b a cs .. 1 , cu N Q, .0 C v et ..-, Q Z cn .1 6 en cn lo V o A 2 i� bo o . a �Q - b E., 7 - tt a-d C •. = c� E a C 2O C o \ aC `� • o b0 > • 'o c,E A 0 o > bJ . a o a. y az � Z U N O a U E �n � vZ -d 0 O w .O izo w) O a o) a i w 0.1 4) Orp x col ••�„ •� 41+ oa 0?' �? 4 C. ti A Ag4 A A