2003-02-20 CC work session CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
C.,
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION: February 20,2003
LOCATION: 1400,Main Street, Southiake,Texas
314 Floor Training Rooms in Town Hall
TIME: 6:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Call to order.
2. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government
Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.076 and 551.087. Refer to
posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. Executive Session may be held,under
these exceptions, at the end of the Regular Session or at any time during the meeting that
a need arises for the City Council to seek advice from the City Attorney as a posted
subject matter of this City Council meeting.
3. Discussion: Downtown District Regulations and modification to R PUD Zoning.
4. Meeting Adjourned.
•
CERTIFICATE
I.hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at Town Hall,
1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, February 14, 2003, at 6 00 p.m.;pursuant to the
Texas Government Code,Chapter 551. goN,,,,,,us,
A.t: a 4cweee I ca
Lori Farwell v• .I
•
City Secretary ,� ,'4•• ** ,•••••��,
If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs,please
advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 817-481-1519 and reasonable accommodations
will be made to assist you.
City Council Work Session
February 20,2003
Page 2
EXECUTIVE SESSION
SECTION 551.071 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY
The City Council may conduct a private consultation with its attorney when the City Council
seeks the advise of its attorney concerning any item on this agenda, about pending and
contemplated litigations, or a settlement offer, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to
the City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Board
of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551. This includes the following pending and/or
contemplated litigation subjects:
1. Hanson Aggregate Central,Inc.,vs. City of Southlake. October 2000.
2. City of Southlake vs. Timarron et.al. May 2001.
3. Oakmont Enterprises,Inc.,vs. City of Southlake, and Sabre, Inc. January 2002.
4. Leona and Raymond Fox vs. City of Southlake.April 2002.
5. David A. Gray vs. City of Southlake.April 2002.
6. City of Southlake vs. Pinnacle Integrated Technologies,Inc. September 2002.
7. Richard W.Hart vs. City of Southlake. September 2002.
SECTION 551.072 DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY
The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or
value of real property. •
SECTION 551.073 DELIBERATION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT
The City Council may conduct a closed meeting to deliberate a negotiated contract for a
prospective gift or donation to the City.
SECTION 551.074 DELIBERATION REGARDING PERSONNEL MATTERS
The City Council may deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation,reassignment, duties,
discipline, or dismissal of public officers, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City
Attorney, and city boards and commission members. A complete list of the city boards and
commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office.
• SECTION 551.076 DELIBERATION REGARDING SECURITY DEVICES
The City Council may deliberate the deployment, or specific occasions for implementation of
security personnel or devices.
SECTION 551.087 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NEGOTIATIONS
The City Council may discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information
received from a business prospect that the city seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the
city and which the City is conducting economic development negotiations; or to deliberate the
offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect as described above.
I Y
l
- -
4
A MN
l ..i City of Southlake
C Southlake Department of Planning
MEMORANDUM
February 14, 2003
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bruce Payne, AICP, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Discussion of proposed Downtown District regulations.
REQUESTED ACTION: Review and discuss Ordinance 480-SS - proposed revisions to the
Comprehensive Zoning ordinance pertaining to the creation of a
"Downtown" Zoning District intended to be applied to Southlake
Town Square NR-PUD
APPLICANT: City initiated.
BACKGROUND: At their regularly scheduled meeting on February 4, 2003, City
Council requested a work session to be held on February 20,2003 to
Cr discuss the proposed Downtown District regulations in concert with
the Planned Unit Development district zoning text amendment.
Attached with this memo is a comparison table which highlights the
key differences between the proposed Downtown District and the
existing Town Square NR-PUD.
SUPPORTING Comparison table between NR-PUD regulations and proposed
DOCUMENTS: Downtown District regulations
k
r'
ca c
CD o 0�, o
q CI4, :~ � � a 00 -" a •5 '
O -C U Q O' ccd `n 4 go E c.s1 cis
~ ," O �bA >' O U 74 CL aj
O ,
A C `n E. ' v� b O O b 00' O ... �+
v . U N >, y et C �" 0 O N > V N
C a' c) •m s ' -0 4' b0" E •vi O U 0--0 a) 'S cn -d
E
° ar
� a oa a, kIC)
o
o �nN, 00 ° > 0 00 . a ,) 4Qa) o� . 3 cz0 �o -d a . ' O 0' a o ,
•. 0.) Qa' C 0 . '� 4, �O ry 6O y z ... V) • 0 cn > O 0. Q , A
A v 0c1 O 'd r) E 'C 'C � .b a' NwO a � O t, O0
pc C 0 ,... Q, cn co y .sue , �, .,, Q s. -y..,. a' N
a 0 0
A -d ,� ,b ,." cn4a r:. -dam - 3D o •00E
Um
o i a.43 ° N 3 Z •3 a) o O a' 0 �' a-' - 0.
' -C — 0 tv 'b E .2 .0 0 rn O co -C 04 Q.-C O G" cd •C >
O A a' w 3 an a a' -' ' Ti >, 0 .
O
as
•9 O
0
�i cl N
W a)
v
Ga) c
A . � N a)
OU O C 0 cr)�, 1:j 'b
a cs
.. 1 , cu
N Q, .0 C v et ..-, Q
Z
cn
.1 6
en cn
lo
V o A 2 i�
bo
o .
a �Q - b E.,
7 -
tt
a-d C •.
= c� E
a C
2O C o \ aC `� •
o
b0 > • 'o c,E A 0 o > bJ . a o a.
y az � Z U N O a U E �n � vZ -d
0
O
w
.O izo w) O
a o) a i w
0.1
4) Orp x col ••�„ •� 41+ oa
0?' �?
4 C. ti A Ag4 A A