Loading...
2001-04-03 CC PacketCity of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting • Aizenda Item No. 4B, Note that Finance Director Sharen Elam has included the Sales Tax Report for your review. If you have any questions, contact Sharen. • Agenda Item No. 4E. Committee Reports. At the suggestion of Councilmember DuPre, I have added Committee Reports to the agenda as a regular item. This will give you the opportunity to hear reports from all the Council concerning Boards and committees i.e., JUC, SPDC, Drug and Alcohol, etc. Contact Patsy or me if you have any questions. • Agenda Item No 5A Approval of minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held March 20, 2001. If you have any changes to the minutes, please discuss these at the work session or notify Sandy LeGrand prior to the meeting. Sandy will bring the amended minutes to the meeting for your consideration. • Agenda Item No 5B Approval to enter into Texas Parks and Wildlife grant on behalf of Southlake Equestrian Association. As you may recall, SEA was awarded a grant from TPWD for trailhead improvements at Bob Jones Park. In order to enter into the contract, however, TPWD requires the organization, if not a municipality or governing body, to be registered as a non-profit organization (IRS 501c(3) typically). SEA is not registered as a non-profit, and has indicated it will be unable to do so in a timely manner. In order to receive the grant funding, the City can enter into the contract, but this requires City Council approval. The total grant amount is for $6,317 with a commitment from the sponsor of $1,579 in matching funds or in -kind contributions. The Southlake Equestrian Association has committed to providing the necessary matching funds for the project. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Kevin Hugman. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 2 of 11 • Agenda Item No. 5C. Resolution No. 01-018, Supporting grant for Cross Timbers Equestrian Trails Association for improvements to trails. This resolution lends support to an effort by CTETA and the Town of Flower Mound to seek grant funds for improvements to multi -use trails around Lake Grapevine. You may recall there has been an ongoing effort to provide equestrian and hiking trails around the lake. One of the major components of this plan, however, is the need to construct a bridge over Denton Creek. This grant, if awarded, will accomplish this key task and provide funds to link and improve existing trails. Representatives of CTETA have met with Southlake Equestrian Association (SEA) members Sherry Berman and Cara White, as well as the Parks and Recreation Board at its March 19, 2001, meeting. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Kevin Hugman. • Agenda Item No. 5D, Award of bid to SRO General Contracting for the construction of intersection improvements at South Carroll Avenue at East Continental Boulevard and Brumlow Avenue. This project includes constructing the ultimate concrete pavement section along Carroll from the CISD elementary school now under construction to East Continental, as well as providing left turn lanes at the other approaches on the East Continental/Brumlow intersection and the East Continental/Breeze Way intersection. Breeze Way also will receive a 2-inch hot mix asphalt overlay between Continental and South Carroll. As part of the CISD Old Union School project, the school district is constructing the south half of Carroll along the school property (city funds will reimburse the school district). As a result, the ultimate section of Carroll from Breeze Way to Continental will be in place after the completion of these two projects. In addition to the paving improvements, a 12-inch water line along East Continental from Carroll to Crooked Lane is included in the project. The water line also was budgeted in the FY 2000-2001 CIP. Bids were received on March 28, 2001. Three bids were received, with SRO General Contracting being the low bidder. The bids have been reviewed by Cheatham & Associates and city staff, and are tabulated as follows: Bidder Bid Amount Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 3 of 11 SRO General Contracting $783,922.10 Sutton & Associates $841,218.90 Ed A. Wilson, Inc. $929,491.20 The paving and drainage improvements totaling $510,156.60 are within the $675,000 budget. Similarly, the water line improvements totaling $273,765.50 are within the budget for this portion of the project. Allocation of a 6 % contingency for unanticipated construction -related items also is requested. If you have questions regarding this item, contact Pedram Farahnak. • Agenda Item No. 5E, Authorize the Mayor to reject the bid for the construction of TMB intersection improvements to South Carroll Avenue at FM 1709 and Brumlow Avenue at SH 26. The two referenced intersection improvements were approved by voters as part of the Traffic Management Bond Program (TMB) in May 1999. Subsequently, HNTB Corporation has (bw prepared construction plans and specifications for the projects. These two intersections were selected to be the next two TMB projects based on the severity of delay experienced by motorists. Staff decided to bid both intersections as one project in an effort to make the project more attractive to contractors. The project was advertised beginning on March 4, and a pre -bid meeting was held on March 12. At the March 21 bid opening, staff received only one bid -- from AUI General Contractors. Prior to the bid opening, HNTB and staff personally contacted 14 local contractors in an effort to solicit as many bidders as possible. Most of these firms indicated that, due to rain delays on other projects, they would not be able to allocate enough resources to this project, and consequently would not be able to submit a bid. The low bid of $2,525,252.52 submitted by AUI General Contractors is significantly higher than the estimate for this project. It is not advisable in this case to award a bid where only one bid was received. Contact Pedram Farahnak with questions concerning this item. JL Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 4 of 11 • Agenda Item No. 5F, Appointment of Rick Black as Director of Public Safety. As you know, Rick Black has been Interim Director of Public Safety for the past six months, and I believe he has done an excellent job. He has carried out the day-to-day business of the department with the utmost professionalism and attention to detail with very little intervention. Shana and I have heard nothing but praise from his peers as well as his fellow workers, and we highly recommend his promotion to Director of Public Safety. Contact me if you have any questions on this item. • Agenda Item No. 5G, Appointment of Harold Cates as Director of Human Resources. This should have been brought forward for your consideration last Council meeting and I apologize for the oversight. As you can see from Mr. Cates' resume, he has a broad range of experience that I believe will bring strength and professionalism to our organization. Mr. Cates began work with the City on March 15. Hopefully all of you have had an opportunity to meet Mr. Cates and will agree that he is a good choice for the City of Southlake. Contact me if you have any (W questions on this item. • Agenda Item No. 6A. Public Forum, Presentation on the 2000 Census. This will be a brief presentation of the 2000 Census figures for the City of Southlake. Also the 2000 Census population figures for the region also will be presented. If you have any questions on this item, contact Ken Baker. • Agenda Item No. 7A, Ordinance No. 480-313A, 2' Reading, ZA 01-007, Rezoning and Revised Concept Plan for Sabre Corporate Campus. This is a "clean up" zoning to bring the Kirkwood Boulevard and East T.W. King rights -of -way into the Sabre Corporate Campus PUD zoning district. These rights -of -way were approved for abandonment in April of last year and currently have PUD zoning for the MTP-IBM Solona and Kirkwood Hollow projects. This request will also revise the Sabre concept plan to include the area within its boundary. This request does not change any of the uses, regulations or conditions of the originally approved zoning and concept plan. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 5 of 11 The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) on March 8, 2001. The City Council approved 1" reading (7-0) subject to the staff review on March 20, 2001. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Bruce Payne. • Agenda Item No. 7B, Ordinance 480-358, 2' Reading, ZA 01-013, Rezoning from "SF-lA" to "RE", Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Estates. This property is located on the east side of North Peytonville Avenue approximately 750' south of West Dove Street. This is a 6.8-acre platted lot with an existing home on the property. It is staffs understanding that the new property owner desires to construct a larger accessory barn and covered riding arena than the current SF-lA zoning district permits (max. 1,000 square -feet in cumulative accessory structures). The "RE" Residential Estate district permits a maximum of 5 % of the lot area in LW cumulative accessory structures. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) on March 8, 2001. The City Council approved 1" reading (7-0) on March 20, 2001. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Bruce Payne. • Agenda Item No. 8A, Ordinance No. 480-359, 1' Reading, ZA00-126, Zoning and Concept Plan for Gumm Professional Offices The property is located on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) across from Village Center Drive. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District and the requested zoning "O-1" Office District and was amended to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "O-1" Office District uses at the P&Z hearing. The purpose of the rezoning and concept plan is to allow two offices and a bank on 3.6 acres. All the buildings proposed are under 4,200 square feet. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-1, Commissioner Jones dissented), on March 22, 2001 subject to the plan review, accepting the applicant's agreement to change the zoning to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses, Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 6 of 11 limiting the maximum building size of the back two buildings to 4,200 square feet, requiring the applicant to build an 8-foot trail, and limiting the height of the light poles to 8 feet and shielding the lighting on the ATM but complying with State requirements for lighting of the ATM area. If you have any questions regarding this item, contact Bruce Payne. • Agenda Item No. 8B, Ordinance No, 480-360, ZA 01-017, Zoning and Concept Plan for Clariden School. This item has been withdrawn. The applicant is resubmitting a new application which will be going back to P & Z on 4/ 19/01. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Bruce Payne. • Agenda Item No. 8C, Ordinance No. 480-361, ZA 01-024, Rezoning of 3 acre tract in O.W. Knight Survey A-899. This property is located on the east side of Pine Street south of White's (W Chapel United Methodist Church and west of Timarron Northwood Park Addition. The current zoning is "AG" and the requested zoning is "SF-lA." A single -lot plat for the property has been submitted for review. The purpose of this request is to comply with city regulations for new home construction. The applicant wants to construct a new home on the property. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) on March 22, 2001. If the Council has no issues with this request, it could be moved to consent. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Bruce Payne. • Agenda Item No. 10A. Call A Ride of Southlake (CARS) report / request for remainder of funding. City Council approved entering into a scope of services agreement with CARS on October 20, 2000. The agreement approved funding in the amount of $9,000 to CARS in October with an additional $9,000 payment due on or before April 1, 2001, granted CARS had raised $12,000 for a total annual operating budget of $30,000. CARS has indicated that it has raised the necessary funds and is now requesting the remaining $9,000 payment from the City. A representative from CARS will be at your meeting to provide a report on the activities of CARS Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 7 of 11 and answer any questions that you might have. If you need additional information regarding this item, please contact Kevin Hugman. • Agenda Item No. 10B. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Costco Wholesale located at 2601 East SH 114. As Costco approaches the conclusion of construction, it is conducting employee hiring and has obtained permits for two banner signs to attract applicants. The sign ordinance limits the use of such signs to 14 days and requires that they be affixed to a building. One of the issues that Costco and other businesses have addressed with Economic Development has been the ability to attract an adequate number of employees. This variance requests that the banners be allowed to continue until April 26, 2001. In addition, Costco requests to be able to construct two wooden frameworks with banner signs affixed to them to advertise the "Grand Opening" and to allow these signs to be used from April 12 to May 12, 2001. Costco is unique in its needs because of its large size, limited visibility due to the trees and the roadway construction, as well as its setbacks off of SH 114 and Southlake Boulevard. Costco believes these options will allow an opportunity to attract employee applicants and to adequately advertise its opening dates. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Rick Black. • Agenda Item No 10C, Request for a variance to Sign Ordinacne No. 704-A for Big Bowl Fresh Asian Cooking located at 2700 E. Southlake Boulevard. Big Bowl Fresh Asian Cooking has requested a sign variance to allow one oversized sign incorporating several three-dimensional elements into the main sign, plus one additional sign over and above the number allowed under the ordinance requirements. A large bowl and chopsticks to be placed on the roof of the structure, along with the sign lettering, constitute the main cause for the variance request. While all of the letters of each sign meet the allowed height requirement of no more than 30 inches, the bowl and chopsticks present a 56-inch profile, which is 26 inches taller than the 30 inches allowed under the Gateway Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 8 of 11 provisions. The overall square footage of the proposed main sign totals 129 square feet, which is 10 square feet (8%) over the allowed 119 square feet. Big Bowl contends the added three-dimensional elements are necessary because they identify the establishment in the same manner as the "Golden Arches" of a McDonalds and are, in effect, the restaurant's logo. The issue has been noted in the local newspaper (please see the attached story in the Council packet). The one additional sign is to be attached at the north elevation. If you have any questions regarding this, contact Rick Black. Other Items of Interest • Economic Development Topics. — Boeing Project. Greg Last attended a meeting Friday morning coordinated by the Texas Department of Economic Development (TDED) and the Greater Dallas Chamber and Greater Fort Worth Chamber. Some information was distributed regarding the Boeing opportunity, but many details still are being sought. The emphasis of all parties at this point is to work cooperatively to represent the DFW region to Boeing. We will continue to stay involved and pursue this opportunity to our best advantage. It is our intent at this point to support and work cooperatively with regional representatives the narrow the selection to the DFW region only. Contact Greg if you would like to further discuss the project. • Town Use Policy. John Eaglen has been working on the Town Use Policy for the past couple of weeks. We should have a draft for your review included with my memo next Friday, April 6. Town Square Site Plan Modification. Planning Director Bruce Payne has received a request from Jeff Jones of Cooper & Stebbins to consider a minor site plan modification for the southwest comer of Town Square. Specifically, Cooper & Stebbins has requested to place cut Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 9 of 11 and fill material that will be generated from a recently approved project on the east side of Town Square in the northern portion of the detention pond area located at the southwest corner of the project. Their purpose is to create additional parking in the southwest sector of Town Square. Cooper & Stebbins have provided an engineering analysis of the reduced detention pond area and determined that the reduced volume of the detention pond is more than adequate to contain anticipated stormwater from the Town Square area. The City engineering staff has reviewed and verified the engineering analysis and concur with it's findings. The purpose of placing the fill material in the detention pond area is to provide additional parking, approximately 94 spaces, in the southwest sector of the Town Square area. Sec. 40.6 (Administrative Action) of the city's zoning ordinance authorizes administrative approval of minor changes to approved site plans. The ordinance lists 10 criteria that must be met before an administrative approval for a site plan change may be granted. Upon review of the listed criteria in view of the proposed site plan modifications, Bruce has determined that all criteria necessary to authorize an administrative approval of a minor change to a site plan have been met. I have included their letter of request and a map of the site plan modification for your review. If you have any questions, contact Bruce Payne. • Southlake Public Library Ten Year Strategic Plan. At their annual retreat on Jan. 6, 2001, the Library Board worked with City staff to develop a draft copy of the Southlake Public Library Ten Year Strategic Plan. The goal was to develop a single document that could serve as a development tool to help guide future library growth. This Plan also would prove useful in discussions with the Friends of the Southlake Library, the Southlake Library Foundation, and other organizations, regarding fund raising strategies. The Ten Year Strategic Plan includes, in general terms, the steps that need to be taken in order for the City of Southlake to develop a library that would meet, and hopefully, exceed the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 10 of 11 expectations of citizens. The Plan is intended to be a flexible document that can be modified to take into consideration future library technology, the changing economic disposition of the City, and varying attitudes within the community. The Library Board formally adopted the Southlake Public Library Ten Year Strategic Plan for presentation to City Council at their February 28, 2001 meeting (7-0). For your information, a copy of the plan is attached to my memo. If you have any questions, contact Kevin Hugman. • Also attached to my memo: — Update on north side N-4 sewer improvements. Contact Pedram or me if you have any questions. — SH 114 status report — Charter Cable Update. Contact James Kunke if you have any questions. — KUDOS C-- Staff Extension Numbers: Baker, Ken, Senior Planner, 481-2046 Black, Rick, Interim DPS Director, 481-2406 Campbell, Billy, City Manager, 481-1409 Cates, Harold, Human Resources Director, 481-1952 Eaglen, John, Assistant to the City Manager, 481-1433 Elam, Sharen, Finance Director, 481-1713 Farahnak, Pedram, Public Works Director, 481-2308 Hugman, Kevin, Director of Community Services, 481-1527 Jackson, Malcolm, Chief of Building Services, 481-5543 Kunke, James, Public Information Officer, 481-1456 Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, 481-1671 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, 481-1519 Payne, Bruce, Planning Director, 481-2036 Thomas, Charlie, City Engineer, 481-2175 Wagoner, Stefanie, Economic Development Specialist, 481-1676 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 3, 2001 Page 11 of 11 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, 481-1429 City of Southlake, Texas Director's Meeting April 2, 2001 CALENDAR OF EVENTS: 1. Monday, April 2, Kim Bush out of the office buu)-JA tz 2. Monday, April 2, 2:00 p.m., BC/GL/Mayor meeting with Pro -fitness @ executive conf room 3. Monday, April 2, 7:00 p.m., Tarrant County Mayor's Meeting 4. Tuesday, April 3, 10:00 a.m., BUSE meeting with Ann Creighton 5. Tuesday, April 3, 5:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 6. Wednesday, April 4, 7:00 p.m., SPIN #1 meeting re: softball complex 7. Note that there will not be a Crime Control Board meeting 8. Thursday, April 5, 7:30 a.m., Southlake Executive Forum (Candidates Forum) @ Mi Cocina 9. Thursday, April 5, 6:30 p.m., P&Z meeting 10. Saturday, April 7, 8:00 a.m. — 2:30 p.m., SPIN Retreat, 3`d Floor training room TECHNOLOGY REPORT: TOWN HALL REPORT: LAND ACQUISITION STATUS: PERSONNEL POLICIES/ISSUES: BUDGET AFTERMATH: LEGAL ISSUES: SPIN TOPICS: CITIZEN INQUIRIES/COMPLAINTS: Director's Meeting April 2, 2001 Page 2 OTHER ITEMS: 1. Town Hall Use Policy - JE 2. Outlook Master Calendar of Meeting Rooms - BC 3. "Information for your calendar" prepared for City Council by SLG * *indicates attachment INFORMATION FOR YOUR CALENDAR MARCH 30, 2001 • April 2, 7:00 p.m. Executive Conference Room. Candidate meeting with Election Judge and Alternate Judge. Go over procedures for election/signs, parking, etc. • April 2, 7:00 p.m. Tarrant County Mayor's meeting in Fort Worth. Tarrant County Administration Building, 100 E. Weatherford Street, 5rh floor. Representative from Public Works will attend this meeting for Mayor Stacy. • April 2, 6:30 p.m. Councilmember Rex Potter meet with representatives from the Clariden School. 4th floor conference room. • April 3, 5:30 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting in Town Hall. April :00 p.m. Gnime ontrol and a tion Me.ing:� 6 North rrollvenue. • A r' 4, T. p. m. PIN �rneeonft in Cgrhiunit!�Center.To c:ftIomptes k. • I" Report of Campaign Finance due on April 5, 2001. For candidates in May 5, 2001 General Election. • April 5, 7:30 a.m. Southlake Executive Forum. Mi Cocina Restaurant in Town Square. This is to be a "Meet the Candidate Forum." • April 5, 6:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in Town Hall. • April 7, "Petland" grand opening. Gary Fawks owner. More information coming. • April 7, 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. SPIN Retreat, Southlake Town Hall, 3'd floor Conference Room. • April 10, 6:00 p.m. SPIN Candidates Forum at Johnson Elementary School. • April 11, 12 noon. Mayor's Advisory Luncheon. Executive Conference Room. • April 11, 6:00 p.m. Teen Court Advisory Board meeting. 4th floor of Town Hall. • April 11, 6:30 p.m. Joint City Council/CISD meeting to discuss issues related to Joint use items. (Natatorium agreement, etc.) 3'd floor conference room # 3c and #3d at Town Hall. • April 11, 7:00 p.m. Library Board meeting. Location to be determined. • April 13, Good Friday, City Offices Closed. • April 15, Easter Sunday. • April 17, 5:30 p.m. City Council meeting. 0 • April 18 to May 1, Early Voting for May 5, General �i.. Election. City voting in executive conference room and CISO voting in lobby of Town Hall. • April 19, 7:30 a.m. Metroport Meeting. Location to be announced. • April 19, 6:30 p.m. Mayor's Roundtable meeting with dinner at Iron Horse Golf Course. • April 19, 6:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Town Hall Council Chambers. • April 25, 11:00 a.m. Testing Voting Machines at Tarrant County Election Warehouse in Fort Worth. If interested in attending, please call City Secretary. (OW 2nd Report of Campaign Finance for candidates in May 5 2001 General Election is due on April 27, before 5:00 p.m. Office of City Secretary. • April 27, 28 & 29, Art in the Square at Town Square. • April 27, 8:00 a.m. Grand Opening/Ribbon Cutting for Costco. More information coming. Councilmembers have been invited to attend. • April 28, 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Executive Conference Room. Early Voting extended hours. • April 29, Colleyville Women's Club Awards Reception. For .• more information, please give me a call. • May 1, Early Voting ends at 7:00 p.m. • May 1, 5:30 p.m. Regular City Council meeting. • May 3, 6:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. • May 5, 2001, Election Day! Carroll Junior High School at 800 North White Chapel Boulevard. The City will be sharing the location with CISD once again. We moved from Johnson Elementary School because of much needed space during elections. • May 8, 6:00 p.m. Official Canvass of May 5, General/Special Election. City Council Chambers of Town Hall. • May 12, 4:00 p.m. Christian Men's Network Dedication of new Building services. Councilmembers invited to attend. • May 15, 2001, Regular City Council meeting. • May 17, United Way 15th Annual celebration honoring "Volunteers of the Year" from each of the Tarrant County's 36 cities. Councilmembers invited to attend. • May 17, 6:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. • June 2, Runoff Election (if necessary) 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 .. p.m. Carroll Junior High School, 800 N. White Chapel Boulevard, Southlake. If you have questions, please give me a call. Thank You --- Sandy LeGrand (481-1519) M:UNFORMATTON FOR YOUR CALENDAR 3-30-01.doc CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 1 % SALES TAX REPORT 2000-01 collected bud -get to date $ 4,099,565 $ 1,863,830 budget balance balance percent 2 235 735 54.54% MONTH FISCAL YEAR 98-99 % Inc -Dec FISCAL YEAR 99-00 % Inc -Dec FISCAL YEAR 00-01 % Inc -Dec October $310,767 31.0% 310,517 -0.1 % 393,031 26.6% November 206,887 6.8% 300,330 45.2% 323,691 7.8% December 188,493 15.0% 251,264 33.3% 325,233 29.4% January 313,831 17.8% 353,616 12.7% 519,763 47.0% February 199,573 18.2% 271,605 36.1% 302,112 11.2% March 194,635 21.5% 240,577 23.6% -100.0% April 311,919 44.9% 365,598 17.2% -100.0% May 257,679 18.3% 296,420 15.0% -100.0% June 249,323 24.5% 300,786 20.6% -100.0% July 346,698 26.5% 381,766 10.1 % -100.0% August 245,730 9.6% 307,797 25.3% -100.0% September 242,010 20.9% 303,520 25.4% -100.0% TOTAL $3,067 546 21.6% $3,683,796 1 $1.863 830 Actual Budget Month 1999-00 2000-01 October $ 310,517 $345,593 November 300,330 334,115 December 251,264 279,590 January 353,616 393,558 February 271,605 302,138 March 240,577 267,702 April 365,598 406,677 May 296,420 330,015 June 300,786 334,934 July 381,766 424,715 August 307,797 342,724 September 303,520 337,804 _ $ 3,683,796 $ 4,099,565 $ Actual Estimated (budget-est.) % 2000-01 2000-01 Difference Change $393,031 $393,031 $ 47,438 13.29% 323,691 323,691 (10,424) -4.23% 325,233 325,233 45,643 21.31 % 519,763 519,763 126,205 34.66% 302,112 302,112 (26) -0.01 % - 267,702 - 0.00% - 406,677 - 0.00% - 330,015 - 0.00% - 334,934 - 0.00% - 424,715 - 0.00% - 342,724 - 0.00% - 337,804 - 1,863,830 $ 4,308,401 $ 208,836 4/6 16.96% 1% y City of Southlake, Texas N MEMORANDUM March 30, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xt. 1527) SUBJECT: Approval to enter into Texas Parks and Wildlife grant on behalf of Southlake Equestrian Association (SEA) for trail improvements. Action Requested: City Council approval to execute the Texas Parks and Wildlife grant on behalf of Southlake Equestrian Association (SEA) for equestrian trail improvements. Background Information: SEA was awarded a grant through the Texas Parks and Wildlife (TPWD) National Recreational Trails Fund Program on August 26, 1999, for equestrian facility improvements at Bob Jones Park. Reimbursement from TPWD for work performed as part of the grant will not exceed 80% of the grant project or $6,317. SEA will fund a minimum of $1,579 to satisfy the grant. Additional SEA funding ($2,104) has been acquired for a total of $3,683 and along with the TPWD grant, was leveraged to obtain an SPDC matching funds grant in the amount of $10,000. SEA will fund their portion of the project through individual donations, fund-raising events, and in -kind contributions. SEA has not been able to enter into the required contract with TPWD since they are not a 501(c)(3)-status organization. A municipality can execute the contract, however that implies a liability on the City by transferring responsibility for execution and financial match from SEA to the City. The project, including the TPWD grant project and the SPDC matching funds project, is proposed to compliment the equestrian facilities at Bob Jones Park and will be completed prior to the December 31, 2001 grant deadline. A complete schedule of the planned improvements and projected costs are attached. Financial Considerations: The City would be responsible for funding the minimum 20% financial requirement of the grant ($1,579) should SEA fail to do so. The City will also be responsible for the administration of the grant and construction management. Funding in the amount of $10,000 was received by SEA through the re - approval of an SPDC matching funds grant on March 26, 2001 (6-0). ta r 't Billy Campbell, City Manager March 30, 2001 Page 2 �1w Citizen Input/ Board Review: Resolution No. 99-32, supporting the SEA grant application and the establishment of equestrian trails at Lake Grapevine, was approved by the City Council at their May 18, 1999 meeting (7-0). On June 7, 1999, SEA presented the project proposals to the Parks and Recreation Board. No Board opposition was made during the discussion. The Parks and Recreation Board recommended to SPDC the approval of matching grant funding in the amount of $6,317, and approval of additional matching grant funding in the amount of $3,683 once SEA raises this amount, at their September 13, 1999 meeting (8-0). SEA requested and was awarded conditional SPDC matching funds of $10,000 on September 27, 1999. The Parks and Recreation Board recommended the execution of the Texas Parks and Wildlife grant on behalf of Southlake Equestrian Association (SEA) for equestrian trail improvements, and reauthorization of $10,000 in SPDC matching grant funding, at their March 19, 2001 meeting (6-0). SPDC reauthorized $10,000 in matching grant funding, and recommended the execution of the Texas Parks and Wildlife grant on behalf of the Southlake Equestrian Association at their March 26, 2001 meeting (6-0). Legal Review: The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed agreement. Alternatives: Reject the award of grant by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: ■ National Recreational Trails Fund Agreement ■ Letter of Notification of Award for $6,317 in grant funding from Texas Parks and Wildlife (TPWD) through the National Recreational Trails Fund Program, dated August 26, 1999. ■ Project schedule and cost estimate. Staff Recommendation: City Council approval to execute the Texas Parks and Wildlife grant on behalf of Southlake Equestrian Association (SEA) for equestrian trail improvements. S ' kL WE - TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT NATIONAL RECREATIONAL TRAILS FUND AGREEMENT This agreement between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (hereinafter TPWD) and City of Southlake (hereinafter Sponsor) for construction of a recreational trail in Denton County, Texas is made under Texas Recreational Trails Fund. BACKGROUND The TPWD Recreational Grants Program, which administers the Texas Recreational Trails Fund (hereinafter TRTF) made available under the National Recreational Trails Act (hereinafter The Act), awards reimbursement -type grants to eligible public entities and private organizations to be used on trails and trail -related projects. To be eligible, the project must have been planned and developed under existing federal laws and state laws, and all related policies and administrative procedures; and The City of Southlake, eligible under The Act, made a grant application for a suitable project and was awarded a TRTF grant. THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and benefits hereof, TPWD and the Sponsor hereby agree as follows: TERMS Sponsor will improve an existing equestrian trailhead by constructing hitching posts, providing water, constructing signs and tables in accordance with approved plan (hereinafter the Project) by December 31, 2001. While doing any work under the terms of this agreement, Sponsor will adhere to all requirements established for the National Recreational Trials Fund including those set out in Procedural Guidelines, Project Development and Grant Reimbursement Procedures, and Acquisition Project Procedures and by the signature of its authorized agent below asserts that it had read all of the foregoing requirements. Sponsor will properly and adequately maintain the Project into the foreseeable future so that it is available and safe for use by the public. TPWD and Sponsor agree that the total cost of the Project will be Seven Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety Six Dollars ($7,896) and that reimbursement to Sponsor for work performed under this agreement will not exceed Eighty Percent (80%) of the project cost up to the grant funds approved, Six Thousand Three Hundred and Seventeen Dollars ($6,317). Sponsor will be paid up to $6,317 after submitting billings to TPWD for approved work. Sponsor will begin work after execution of this agreement. This contract is subject to cancellation, without penalty, either in whole or in part, if funds are not appropriated by the Texas Legislature, or otherwise made available, to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. This agreement will be in effect on the last date of the signatures below. TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT Jacky D. Branham, Director Purchasing, Payments and Property CITY OF SOUTHLAKE *,%W Date: Date: 2 E,6-L� August 26, 1999 Ms. Cara White Southlake Equestrian Association 4475 Homestead Dr. Southlake, TX 76262 L.•410M44. ►T. wori.. X-c—.O M.C., NC•••• V,CO C..u...AN. P•u.AS KK.92T AnOkL0. J" Dear Ms. White: N.9. ". PIT"O"'" 1 am pleased to inform you that today the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission `"°` `„ a;;;; awarded National Recreational Trail finds and your Bob Jones Park Trailhead project L was selected to receive partial grant funding of $6,317. Our advisory board "°"`T°" recommended that the round pens should not be flnded with trail funds and were K..r. V A."...°.•fl 109.1 PA.L•a deleted form the project. Not— ■... AL.,N ".AK t ".Too". J. We have begun environmental and historical resource reviews of die awarded projects. �•" •"'°"'° The Historical Commission reviews the project for potential impacts to known archeology sites and our Resource Protection staff looks for potential natural resource impacts. These reviews should be completed within two months. After these reviews are completed and assuming there are no resource issues to be resolved, t will make `��� o�=�'•�; arrangements to meet with you and view the trail site and proposed work to be accomplished with the grant funds. At this thne, you will receive copies of our billing procedures and a project agreement to execute. Decause your project is located on federal property I still need a letter from the Corps of Engineers that approves you putting this project on their property. Please furnish Ib wmnake and this as soon as possible. No construction may begin before these clearances are completed. 1 towever, if you ar: building a new trail segment and need to flag the route and/or have anything more t1,an a quick resource assessment (archeological testing, plant survey etc.), we can sign a project agreement that will allow costs incurred for this work to count toward the grant project. Please feel free to contact me at (512) 389-4737 if you have any questions. Consratulations for submitting such a worthy proposal. Sincerely, Andrew Goldblcom Program Manager Southlake Equestrian Trail Improvements Itemized Budget Materials: TOTAL Hitching posts with dig rings 15 @ $165.00 $2,475.00 10' with dig rings - "Western Saloon Type" Quick -Crete Concrete 30 bags @ $2.35 $ 70.50 Round Pens 2 - 30' @ $2,150 $4,300.00 1 - 50' @ $2,650 $2,650.00 5' tall with 2 bars, gates (8' sections) Quick -Crete Concrete 60 bags @ $2.35 $ 141.00 Welding $ 200.00 Ranch Faucet Water Spigots 2 @ $85.00 $ 170.00 Faucet Aprons (pavers) 50 sq. feet @ $1.50 sq. foot $ 75.00 Trail Sign Board 1 @ $150.00 $ 150.00 (wooden framed with cover) Picnic Tables 4 @ $625.00 $2,500.00 PVC coated expanded metal, heavy duty Signage 60 @ $5.00 $ 300.00 6' wooden bollards with painted horseshoes - 4' above ground level (includes bollards, paint, and horseshoes) Pipe Rail Fencing 200' @ $20.00/foot $4,000.00 Pipe rail fencing on COE boundary near south trailhead parking lot Labor (materials acquisition - assembly and installation Hitching posts (15) 6 hours x 2 people x 15 posts x $6.20/hr $1,116.00 Round Pens (3) 1 @ 30' x 7 hours x 3 people x $6.20/hr $ 137.20 1@ 30' x 7 hours x 3 people x $6.20/hr $ 137.20 1@ 50' x 8 hours x 3 people x $6.20/hr $ 148.80 Water Spigots/ Ranch Faucets (2) 4 hours x 2 people x 2 spigots x $6.20/hr $ 99.20 Trail Sign Board (1) 2 hours x 2 people x $6.20/hr $ 24.80 Signage (60) 60 bollards x 1 hour x 2 people x $6.20/hr $ 744.00 Equipment Rental/Usage Auger rental $40.00/day x 2 days Tractor rental $125.00/day x 2 days Roll -off dumpster 1 @ $300.00 PROJECT TOTAL ;D4�__)- $ 80.00 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 $209068 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 30, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xt. 1527) SUBJECT: Resolution No. 01-018, Supporting grant application for Cross Timbers Equestrian Trails Association for improvements to trails Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 01-018 in support of grant application submitted by Cross Timbers Equestrian Trails Association, seeking grant funding for improvements to multi -purpose trails around Lake Grapevine. Background Information: On March 31, 1999 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers hosted a meeting with volunteer representatives from cities, community groups, and public entities to discuss the feasibility of an equestrian trail around Lake Grapevine. As a result, a public -private working group was formed consisting of representatives from the Town of Flower Mound, the Cross Timbers Equestrian Trails Association (CTETA), Marshall Creek, the Trophy Club Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Corps of Engineers. Southlake was represented by Parks Board members Sherry Berman and Cara White, then -Board member Dick Anderson, and John Eaglen, now Assistant to the City Manager. While the Southlake portion of the trail is already in place, a key element in making this project a reality is the construction of a bridge over Denton Creek. This bridge would serve as a link to existing north and south trails, and serve equestrians, bicyclists, and runners/hikers. CTETA, working with the Town of Flower Mound, has an opportunity to provide the necessary match and has worked to develop partnerships and cooperation among various user groups and Lake Grapevine communities. If the grant project is approved, it will result in: ■ 35 miles of multi-user Equestrian/hiking/nature walk trails ■ 10 miles multi-user mountain bicycle/hiking trails ■ connect to the planned trails in adjacent communities. CTETA is seeking resolutions of support from Lake Grapevine cities as they move forward with an application to Texas Parks and Wildlife for a National Recreational Trail Fund grant. Financial Considerations: None to City of Southlake. 5C-1 Billy Campbell, City Manager March 30, 2001 Page 2 Citizen Input/ Board Review: On March 19, 2001, Parks and Recreation Board approved (6-0) Cross Timbers Equestrian Trails Association request to pass a resolution in support of a grant application for funding improvements to trails around Lake Grapevine. Members of the Southlake Equestrian Association, Parks Board, and City staff have also met with CTETA officials. Legal Review: Not Applicable. Alternatives: Not support CTETA in their application for funding. Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following: ■ Resolution No. 01-018 supporting grant application for improvements to trails. ■ Lake Grapevine trail map. Staff Recommendation: City Council approval of Resolution No. 01-018 supporting Cross Timbers Equestrian Trails Association grant application for trail improvements at Lake Grapevine. N:\Parks & Recreation\BOARDS\CC\2001\Qtr 2\CTETA trails resolution memo.doc 5C-2 r 9`i4., of Cn■■f{.lolrn Taroe ----✓ - RESOLUTION NO. 01-018 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, EXPRESSING SUPPORT OF A PUBLIC NATURAL SURFACE MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL AROUND LAKE GRAPEVINE AND ENDORSING GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO TRAILS. WHEREAS, the City Council of Southlake, Texas deems it advisable and necessary to support development initiatives that manage quality growth while preserving the abundant open space and rich natural resources of the community; and, WHEREAS, the citizens of Southlake desire facilities that are conducive to maintaining passive open space and recreational uses; and, WHEREAS, demand for facilities conducive to maintaining passive open space and recreational uses are common among communities surrounding Lake Grapevine; and, WHEREAS, the potential exists to develop a new and effective development initiative of a continuous natural surface multi -purpose trail at Lake Grapevine; and, WHEREAS, the best potential for developing this initiative is through partnering city officials of communities surrounding Lake Grapevine, the United States Corps of Engineers, other civic leaders and non-profit organizations; and, WHEREAS, the ability of the public -private partnership to secure public grant funding to complete this project is conditional upon documented public support by the surrounding communities of Lake Grapevine; and, WHEREAS, the entire community of Southlake will benefit from these initiatives; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1 The City Council hereby commits public support to the Cross Timbers Equestrian Trails Association (CTETA) in partnership with other non-profit organizations and Lake Grapevine communities to develop a natural surface multi -purpose trail at Lake Grapevine. This support is documented and available for inclusion in any grant applications submitted by CTETA for participating communities. 5 (.- �) Resolution No. 01-018 April 3, 2001 Page 2 of 2 SF.C'T1nN 2 Authorization of city officials to participate in the development of the projects. The City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Community Services and/or his designated staff to provide administrative support and participation in the Cross Timbers Equestrian Trails Association (CTETA) in partnership with other non-profit organizations and Lake Grapevine communities to develop a natural surface multi- purpose trail at Lake Grapevine. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ON THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL , 2001. APPROVED: Rick Stacy, Mayor Attest: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary N:\Parks & Recreation\Resolutions\01-018CrossTimbersTrail.doc IM r Vq im im TM r• City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM April 3, 2001 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Mike Hutchison, Senior Civil Engineer, Ext. 2361 Subject: Award of bid for the construction of intersection improvements at South Carroll Avenue at East Continental Boulevard and Brumlow Avenue. Action Requested: Award of bid for the construction of intersection improvements at South Carroll Avenue at East Continental Boulevard and Brumlow Avenue. Background Information: The council approved the construction of intersection improvements at Carroll and Continental as a part of the FY2000-2001 Capital Improvements Program. Construction plans and specifications were subsequently prepared by Cheatham & Associates and reviewed by staff for this project. This project includes constructing the ultimate concrete pavement section along Carroll from the CISD elementary school now under construction to East Continental, as well as providing left turn lanes at the other approaches on the East Continental/Brumlow intersection and the East Continental/Breeze Way intersection. Breeze Way will also receive a 2" hot mix asphalt overlay between Continental and South Carroll. As part of the CISD Old Union School project, the school district is constructing the south half of Carroll along the school property (city funds will reimburse the school district). As a result, the ultimate section of Carroll from Breeze Way to Continental will be in place after the completion of these two projects. In addition to the paving improvements, a twelve -inch water line along East Continental from Carroll to Crooked Lane is included in the project. The water line was also budgeted in the FY 2000-2001 CIP. Bids were received on March 28, 2001. Three bids were received, with SRO General Contracting being the low bidder. The bids have been reviewed by Cheatham & Associates and city staff, and are tabulated as follows: 5D-1 Bidder Bid Amount SRO General Contracting $783,922.10 Sutton & Associates $8413218.90 Ed A. Wilson, Inc. $929,491.20 Financial Consideration: The paving and drainage improvements totaling $510,156.60 are within the $675,000 budget. Similarly, the water line improvements totaling $273,765.50 are within the budget for this portion of the project. Allocation of a 6% contingency for unanticipated construction related items are also requested. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: None. Alternatives: The council may award or reject this bid. Supporting Documents: Location Map Project Map Staff Recommendation: Please place on the City Council Agenda for April 3, 2001 for council consideration and approval. Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to SRO General Contracting in the amount of $783,922.10 Staff Contact: Mike Hutchison, E.I.T., Senior Civil Engineer, Ext. 2361 Charlie Thomas, P.E., City Engineer, Ext. 2175 5D-2 South Carroll @Continental Intersection Improvements FM 170! S 1200 0 1200 a z_ ...... _ _.... ........ ....... .__. ...... F—i 1 hl U r. 1�1� (i i � I .tee--. \ � ��..�.+:+..�� �� �»•fr'" 0, U 9 LLJ j', W l r Ll J qx Li � p fit`• ; i t �• i. �l I..L t t k a n N I - { i ry bi in... ; o� Z UOC Q ��r LLJ Lj U < If 06 r LLJ j -- �- 5D-4 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM April 3, 2001 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, ext. 2175 Subject: Authorize the Mayor to reject the bid for the construction of TMB intersection improvements to South Carroll Avenue at FM 1709 and Brumlow Avenue at SH 26. Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor to reject the bid for the construction of TMB intersection improvements to South Carroll Avenue at FM 1709 and Brumlow Avenue at SH 26. Background Information: The two referenced intersection improvements were approved by voters as part of the Traffic Management Bond Program (TMB) in May of 1999. Subsequently, HNTB Corporation has prepared construction plans and specifications for the projects. These two intersections were selected to become the next two TMB projects to complete based on the severity of delay experienced by motorists. Staff decided to bid both intersections as one project in an effort to make the project more attractive to contractors. The project was advertised beginning on March 4, and a pre -bid meeting was held on March 12. At the March 21 bid opening, staff received only one bid from AUI General Contractors. Prior to the bid opening, HNTB and staff personally contacted 14 local contractors in an effort to solicit as many bidders as possible. Most of these firms indicated that, due to rain delays on other projects, they would not be able to allocate enough resources to this project, and consequently would not be able to submit a bid. Financial Consideration: The low bid of $2,525,252.52 submitted by AUI General Contractors is significantly higher than the estimate for this project. It is not advisable in this case to accept a bid where only one bid was received. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: None. 5E — 1 Alternatives: The council may award or reject this bid. Supporting Documents: Location Map Staff Recommendation: Please place on the City Council Agenda for April 3, 2001 for council consideration. Staff recommends that the bid be rejected. Staff Contact: Charlie Thomas, P.E., City Engineer, Ext. 2175 Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, Ext. 2308 5E-2 TMB Package 3C & 31): S. Carroll @ FM 1709 and Brumlow @ SH 26 I FM 17 S 1200 0 1200 Feet City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 30, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Appointment of Rick Black as Director of Public Safety Action Requested: City Council approval of the appointment of Rick Black as Director of Public Safety for the City of Southlake. Background Information: The Southlake Charter requires that the "The head of each department shall be a chief, director or superintendent who shall be appointed by the City Manager subject to the approval of the Council and such chief, director, or superintendent shall have supervision and control over his department." Since the departure of Garland Wilson, Rick Black has been serving as Interim Director of Public Safety. For the past 6 months, he has been responsible for carrying out the day-to-day business of the department. Shana and I both believe Rick has done an excellent job and has completely demonstrated his ability to perform the duties of director for the department. Supporting Documents: None Staff Recommendation: I recommend Council approval of the appointment of Rick Black to the position of Director of Public Safety for the City of Southlake. City of Southlake, Texas I MEMORANDUM March 30, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Appointment of Rick Black as Director of Public Safety Action Requested: City Council approval of the appointment of Rick Black as Director of Public Safety for the City of Southlake. Background Information: The Southlake Charter requires that the "The head of each department shall be a chief, director or superintendent who shall be appointed by the City Manager subject to the approval of the Council and such chief, director, or superintendent shall have supervision and control over his department." Since the departure of Garland Wilson, Rick Black has been serving as Interim Director of Public Safety. For the past 6 months, he has been responsible for carrying out the day-to-day business of the department. Shana and I both believe Rick has done an excellent job and has completely demonstrated his ability to perform the duties of director for the department. Supporting Documents: None Staff Recommendation: I recommend Council approval of the appointment of Rick Black to the position of Director of Public Safety for the City of Southlake. City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 26, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Appointment of Harold Cates as Director of Human Resources Action Requested: City Council approval of the appointment of Harold Cates as Director of Human Resources for the City of Southlake. Background Information: The Southlake Charter requires that the "The head of each department shall be a chief, director or superintendent who shall be appointed by the City Manager subject to the approval of the Council and such chief, director, or superintendent shall have supervision and control over his department." Staff and I spent a couple of months interviewing several outstanding candidates for the position of Human Resources Director. I believe. Mr. Cates has exceptional credentials, and staff and I agree that his qualifications best fit the needs of our organization. Supporting Documents: Resume Staff Recommendation: I recommend Council approval of the appointment of Harold Cates to the position of Director of Human Resources for the City of Southlake. t City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT March 30, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-007 PROJECT: Sabre Corporate Campus REQUEST: On behalf of Sabre Group, TSG Trust 1999-1 is requesting approval of a Rezoning and Revised Concept Plan. ACTION NEEDED: I Consider rezoning and revised concept plan request. 2. Conduct Public Hearing ATTACHMENTS (A.) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Concept Plan Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Propertv Owner Letters (G) Ordinance No. 480-313A (H) 11" X 17" copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Wembers Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073) Case No. ZA01-007 Agenda Item 7A IR BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: TSG Trust 1999-1 APPLICANT: Sabre Group PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of State Highway 114 and Kirkwood Drive. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: An approximately 5.1 ­aere portion of an approximately 156 acre tract described as Lot 4, Block A,,MTP-IBM Addition No. 1; Tracts i, 1A1, 1C, 2A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A4 2_A5, 2A7, and portions of Tracts 2A and 2A6 situated in the U.P. Martin Survey; Abstract No. 1015; portions of Tracts 1 and 1 C situated in the James 3. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134; portions of Tracts 3A1, 3AIA, 3A1A2, 3A3A1, 4B, 4131, 4B2, situated in the Rees D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207; and portions of Kirkwood Drive and East T.W. King rights -of -way. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use, Medium Density Residential; 100-Year Flood Plain CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned. Unit Development District and "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2," Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies; training and conference centers; parking structures; heliporustop and verti- portlstop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses. REQUESTED ZONING: "NR-PUD Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2," Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies; training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and verti- port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses, P&Z ACTION: March 8, 2001; Approved (6=0 ) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated March 2, 2001. P&Z SPEAKERS: None COUNCIL ACTION: March 20, 2001; Approved R-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1. dated March 2, 2001. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated March 2, 2001. The purpose of this request is to include the Kirkwood Boulevard and E. T.W. King rights -of -way into the zoning and concept plan boundary of the Sabre Project. At the time of the original zoning and concept plan approval Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA01-007 7A Page 1 an abandonment ordinance for the subject rights -of -way had not been approved. On April 18, 2000, the City Council approved the abandonment ordinances. The applicant is now requesting that they be included in the boundary of the project. Approval of this request will change the permitted uses and development regulations within the rights -of -way to match those within the Sabre project. This site is subject to all previous conditions of approval for the Sabre Project Zoning and Concept Plan (Cass Zh99-056 and Ordinance 480-313). Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA01-007 7A Page 2 Case No. ZA01-007 Vicinity Map Sabre Wl S Agenda Item 7A E Attachment B Page 1 a�r� lop, 11, irl t "11,- fill _j Li i 3 7 -riY` �\\\ II I1 �L .r Agenda Item IA fie z F, 'o CL cze C) t: U ce a Attach f Case No.: ZA01-007 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Review No.: One Project Name: Revised Concept Plan & Zoning — Sabre Corporate Campus Date of Review: 03/02/01 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Sabre Group Brockette, Davis, and Drake, Inc. 4255 Amon Carter 4144 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1100 Fort Worth, TX 76115 Dallas; TX 75204 _ Phone: (817) 963-1118 Phone: (214) 824-3647 Fax: (817) 967-4914 Fax- - (214)824-7064 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY" ON 03/02/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU I•LAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (S 17) 481-2073. Transfer all information from original concept plan as previously approved. Informational Comments: * The purpose of this request is to include the Kirkwood Boulevard and E. T.W. King rights -of -way into the zoning and concept plan boundary of the Sabre Project. At the time of the original zoning and concept plan approval an abandonment ordinance for the subject rights -of -way had not been approved. On April 18, 2000, the City Council approved the abandonment ordinances. The applicant is now requesting that they be included in the boundary of the project. Approval of this request will change the permitted uses and development regulations within the rights-of.:way to match those within the Sabre project. This site is subject to all previous conditions of approval for the Sabre Project Zoning and Concept Plan (Case ZA99-056 and Ordinance 480-313). Denotes Informational Comment N:`.Community Development "VP-FILES\RED"2001\01-007CPLdoc Case No. ZA 01-007 Agenda Item 7A Attachment D Page 1 13 Surrounding Property Owners �- Sabre Corporate Campus, Phase II Propertv Owner Zonin2 Land Use Description Acreage 1. A. Oien 1. AG 1. Low Density Residential 1. 3.61 2. IBM 2. NR-PUD 2. Mixed Use 2. 0.40 3. TXU 3. NR-PUD 3. Mixed Use 3. 2.15 4. Brazos Electric 4. NR-PUD 4. Mixed Use 4. 3.92 5. A. Olen 5. AG 5. Low Density Residential 5. 3,15 6. IBM 6. NR-PUD 6. Medium Density Residential 6. 4.08 . IBM 7. NR-PUD 7. Medium Density Residential 7. 69.05 S. IBM 8. NR-PUD 8. Mixed Use 8. 48.54 9. MTP-IBM 9. NR-PUD 9. Mixed Use 9. 20.15 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E Z A01-007 7A Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Sabre Corporate Campus, Phase II NOTICES SENT: Six RESPONSES: None Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA01-007 7 A Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO.480-313A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS, PORTIONS OF KIRKWOOD. DRIVE AND EAST T.W. KING RIGHTS -OF -WAY MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 388/211, PAGE 68 AND 69 OF PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND AS RECORDED, IN,. CABINET G, PAGE 208, PLAT RECORDS, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.1177 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY. AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "R-PUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND "NR PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO "NR-PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH "0-2," OFFICE DISTRICT USES AND CERTAIN OTHER' PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES WHICH ARE GENERALLY RELATED TO COMMUNICATION, COMPUTER, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES; TRAINING AND CONFERENCE CENTERS; PARKING STRUCTURES; HELIPORT/STOP AND VERTI-PORT/STOP; HOTEL, RESTAURANT, RETAIL AND OFFICE USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN, SUBJECT TO THE PUD DEVELOPMENT'' STANDARDS, ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charier adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 1 buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District and "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance;- and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classificatim. of -said .property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, Case No. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among Agenda Item ZA01-017 7A N:\COMMLNrrY DEVELOPME\T\WP-PILES`ZBA PE\DI\GW80-313A -R.DOC Page 2 Attachment G Page 2 other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interestclearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHL AKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 3 N:'COMMUNTFYDEVLI.CPSIENT.WP-FILES'ZBA PENDING'480-3I3A-R.DOC Page 3 That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Portions of Kirkwood Drive and East T.W. King rights-of-way>MTP-IBM Addition No. 1, an addition to the City of Southlake, according to the plat recorded -in volume 388/211, Page 68 and 69 of plat records, Tarrant County, Texas and.asV recorded in Cabinet G, Page 208, plat records, Denton County, Texas; being approximntaely 5.1177 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" froiii.:"R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District and "NR-PUD":Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District to "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2," Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information . technologies; training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and verti-port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses as depicted on the approved Concept Plan, subject to the PUD development standards, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 4 NWOMMUNMY DEVELOP\LENT.WP-FILES'ZBA`PESDING'd80-313A -R.DOC Page 4 welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of.the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of (lie district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, - Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in. those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this - ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 5 NP,COMMLNTrY DEVELCPNIENT,% P-FILES'7-GA P-EXDI-VG1480-313A -R.DOC Page 5 permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be -prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the Case No. Agenda Item ZA01-017 7 A N:'COMMUNrrY DEVELOPMENTAVP-FILES ZaA`.PENDING',480-313A -R.DOC Page 6 day of , 2001. Attachment G Page 6 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 92001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: �.e Case No. Agenda Item ZA01-017 7A N:\COMML'NITY DEVEL0PStE\T.`.VP-FILES7BA PEN'DING':480-313A -R.DOC Page 7 Attachment G Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" R.O. W. S"'4 7*29 'r MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1 9 VOL. 388-211, PG. 68 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS Z' !j7!4".,- !.-ALE L8 D:',1;7Z)N CO. E: s -7 - i. NITP-IBN DITI 49 Vol. 388-21, 8 C, C12 CZ C SABRE GROUP CAMPUS L07S 11-4 , Bf CCK I ( 3, -RC-CSE Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA0I-017 7A Page 8 N:`CONLMUMTY DEVELOPMEN nWP-FlLES'Z3A P ENDING'48G-313-A. DOC Page 9 0 EXHIBIT "A" t� J N72'37'Cd-W a distance of 404.43 feet to the beg;nnirg of a curve to tne rig whit^ cs . central ogle of 55'CC'GG radius of 474.CC ,_et, cnd c _..crc wn;ch oears Cd"'N - 437.74 feet; A zrg sc;d C r.e to ..._ rign., Cr :: _ dis'J __ _ 45 c1 feet be; nr.iry- to the righ; nos C `- n i _r,le if C5'29' C", a r=._s 474 C'- .__ . zno Crd which tears N14'5238'w - _ said _, rve to ,. _ r, cn crc diet_, c_ c: - feet; --_.,"_ N7751'S2 - _ ,53....__ of 58.00 innin - c eye g o.` .. _. ._^.gar.: _ _ to ..e Ieft whicn hc3 central cny^le of 0579'CG ,, c c0;us of 14:5 CO .-._., crd _.,7rd which becrs S' 'S2'3d _ - 134.51 feet, A;,;said non -tangent curve to the left, en arc distance of 134.55 feet to the begrnirg of a curve to the left which has a central angle of 55'CO`CC", c radius of 4C5.CC feet, crc a chord which bears S45'07'O8- 374.94 feet; Aicng said _':rve to _ ef% or cr_ di3,cnc_ cf 389.73 fee, to the end of scic cur._. a dis:_. __ of 404.43 e^ - has C centrCl angle of 5427'17 , „rcdius of 474_CO niCr. ,,_a s S=5'23'30"E - 433.73 fee:, A;crg said curve to t, e right, on Cr: distance of 450.50 feet to t..e erd of said S13*C3'51"E c distance of 3.34 feet to the beginning of a curve to !ne right w.^.i_h .cs _ central arnglc ol 15'44'29 a rcd6,s of 610.CO feet, and a chord which becrs S1v^'17'27"E - 157C5 feet; Alc.:g said carve 20 the rght, on arc d:s!cnce of 157.59 feet to the enc of said curve; �.._ 2C a distcr,__ 95.53 feet i0 the begvSnning of C CC. _ t whiC.. he cent;ci angle 7;12*27, a cc;us of 10.CC feet, and a_.._.,, whia.n be_rs� A'Crg said curve to !e't, on arc distcnr_ of 12.73 feet to t e _rd sc d __r+e west line of the _`;rernentroreo SABRE GPCUP CAMPUS addlticn; -r.EN;;E SOG'09'22 c clang the .vest line cf said SASPE GPCUP CAMPUS addition, a distance of 131.53 fee'. to the POINT OF BEG;NNING and containing 222,925 square ar 5.1177 acres a.` teed, more or less. Case No. Agenda Item ZA01-017 7A N:'.COMML'N1TY DE'-ELGPMEN PWP-FI L°S'ZB AT END 1`G'480-313-A.DOC Page 9 Attachment G Page 9 EXHIBIT `B" Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 10 ti:`COMMLN-1rY DEVELOPMENirW'P-FILES'ZBA'PE`DIFG`.480.313-A.DOC Page 17 EXHIBIT "B" Exhibit "B" to Ordinance \o. PUD Development Standards SABRE -Non Residential Planned Unit Development 1. PURPOSE. �. The purpose of this SA-BRE Non Residential Planned unit Deveioorrent Ordinance No. is to facilitate the development of a h?Gh Qual;rv, controlled access, master planreu ,eadquarters for a major :urper=e user such as a "Fortune 00" ;.om Ti.e P! � includes pa.. oc o:ci ^atel 1 1 acres as dcsc bed on Exnlbit _ to the PT and as s^.o'.;. , on ',-e Concept - Plan arached as Exhlccr "- b-. I ' ' rereiC .... B. it is anticipated that the ?roperrr will be developed as a secure (i.e., controlled access) "campus style" co Yemte headquarters. Security may include a full perimeter fence with a combination of attended or automatic access controls. Emergency access will be provided as required by the City's Fire Marshal. Access design will include adequate areas to accommodate vehicles that inadvertently approach the Property and must turn around without entering. C. it is anticipated that the Proper: will be developed to include a p-i,ate bouevard d�:si=ned to the City's corstructiun standards for an "A41D arterial" with the exceptions than ii landscape medians may be ler, naptral rather than irrigated; (ii) the six-foot bike ian e will not ne required; (iii; the City's driveway ordinance will not apply; and (iv) the design speed and Geometry will be determined by the Propem owner consistent with the "campus style" atmosphere of the development (with a minimum design speed of 25 mph). The details of private street design (including design speed, geometry, and access to public streets) will be provided as LW part of each site plan. Nlaintenance of the private streets (to public street standards) Aill be the sole responsibility cf the Property owner. D. It is anticipated that a portion of existing Kirl-Rood Boulevard (from SH-11.1 to the ccunda:-: of the Property) and a portion of existing T.W. King Road (that lies benveen the ?:opeT; and Tract 2 of the `1TP-IBM Addition No. 1 ) will both be abandoned and closed for public use after the first phase of the development is ready for occupancy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, continued access to such closed streets by Trophy Club's and the City's emergency fire and ambulance vehicles will be allowed unless and until the Texas Department of Transportation approves a two-way access road from Kirlexocd Boulevard to "old" T W. King Read. Such emergency access will be the same as required by the City's Fire 'Marshal. Public use of "old" T.W. Kins Road west of said Tract 2 will continue. E. i ne pnmar✓ access from the Properry to public streets will be provided b-, the private sreets shown on the Concept Plan; however, no employee access shall be permir•.ed through the access road to White Chapel Road. Emergency (including police, fire, ambulance, and utilities) and security access to the Property may be provided by the access road to White Chapel Road �aiso on the Concept Plan). It will also be necessary to use the White Chanel access road for censt -ciion access for a limited period of six months after the first to occur of (i) the issuance the City of a building permit for the first phase of the office development or (ii) tn.e issuance the Cite of a tot ildin, per nit for t e bride over the North Kir •wood Branch. This time period ra} ^ded 'he Cit✓ Cc,=c;', in ,ts r_2sonable disc:_, .. unon a shoes. ,tat am ex-ers::r.:s nz­,:z.Ssa-i due. to c;rc=,stanc,._ ce crd the .easenab .. rDr- , .._ !ht p-,_ye^ owner. :�E%SPA :uN 16. 7999 G Case No. Agenda Item Attachment ZA01-017 7A Page 11 EXHIBIT *`B" ?-^i;Z".i ov6—,e- agrees :o commence constriction of %he North tlr!C�"CCd Branch bridge Or. _. cz:Or: :e date ;. CCn1meCCeS cCPstPlct;on. of the first phase of the Cis Ce deyelOCr:'-ent. Proper 7, tviii be developed :o include the dedication to the City of approximately acres for a public park along the southeastern boundary of the Propem- adjacent to the South Fork of t rke ocd Branch (as shown on the Concept Plan). The dedication will reset e the right ut not _e obligation) to maintain and landscape such park area at the Property owner's expense and the right to review the design of any improvements to be located or constructed within such nar'.c a ea. ine Property' owner will be responsible for the reasonable costs and expenses to c.^piece the enzineerr:g design of a trail within the dedicated park area and:4ii)-desist and ccns„uct a pedestrian bridze within the dedicated park area to provide access across the.South Kir!kwccd Branc:,. The City will include such park dedication in its regional trail system plan, an._' ;except as provided above) the City will be responsible for the construction and maintenance OF ail" ,mprovements. All improvements will be designed to take maximum advantage of the narirai topography and to minimize the impact on all trees. G. It is anticipated that the Property will be developed to include open space amenities for employees, visitors and customers such as trails, parks and other pedestrian -oriented areas. These amenities will be designed to take maximum advantage of the natural topography of the Property and to minimize the impact on all trees. These amenities will also be designed to be arc :irecrumlly compatibie with both the natural environment in which they ar_ iecared and the bui!dings they sere. Details regarding these amenities will be provided as part of each site plan. Because these amenities serve only "private" development within the Property, a formal Pedestrian Access Plan is not required. H. In addition to open :;pace amenities for employees, visitors and customers, the Concept P':an identifies Natural Areas around the full perimeter of the Proper; . These tiafiaral--Areas, tozether with the dedicated parkland, will buffer the Property from adjacent development, _. _. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this SABRE Non Residential Planned (.'nit Development, the ojiowin_ :=.s are hereby defined "Applicable Cir.�Ordinances" means the ordinances of :i'e Cit.• as aiaended, that .:;ate the development and use of land within the City including, but not ii:::ited to, Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the Unifonn Building Code. B. "Buildable Area" :Weans all of the following areas (as show-i on an approved final plat or approved site plan): (i) the "footprint" of each building or structure, (ii) the area within six feet of _ac building or structure foundation, hii) public and private rights -of -way, (iv) public and ^.,:ate utility and drainage easements; (v) fire lanes, and (vi) all par'.<ing areas (including parking areas that exceed required parking). Case No. ZA01-017 Ci :.cans the Ciry of Southlake, .--xas "Conc_-ct Plan" means the concept plan attached as Exhibjt 3- :c ...e P' D. _ 'Nara 1i a_'.1" ^.s fI:OJe 3r..."a _ -Cown Oi: the CJncC ?:3 .a.1' ,.. escr'•-`- _.._.a .CeCm11d ocen;�ace'o b�.ffe' the p' ._.... -c real oroper': -r, cxhib..... ..._ . �;o. DL99-'J56 RIViS°D July 16, 1999 Agenda Item ;r,- XCP5.;a?5Gs7Attachment G Page 12 7A EXHIBIT "B" - Standards' means :he development standards.ahe' B :o _.e PLC. ",1:s SABRE. Nor. Resicer.ciai Plan.._ De`.eiccrn%.n'. _ ... = district, �`c it) i:s A. B. B- I, and . _xcept as dei;reC above, all -,e=,s used in this PUD shall have .he meanin_a 2;•:en to them by the Ac icabie Cirr O:..inances, 3. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The requirements of:-:s Exhibit "B" ( including the Concept P:an _Onstiil[e PUD Standard3 that apply to the ?toperr,' and pursuant to %vhlch all development .';n the Proper-, shall occur. To the ex:, -pit any aspect of de`:eiepment is-czilated by these PUD Standards, ;: •s _ -t that these PUD Standard's shall be exziusi':e. For ?C3mplc. the landscape scan dards set fork herein shall be the or_v landscape standards that appi. to the Property. If these PUD Standards do not replate a particular aspect o; dcwe:cpmcnt, then such carticular aspect of development shai! be regulated by reference to those provisions of the Applicable City Ordinances that would other vise apply to the "0-2 Office" zoning district, as amended. In the event of any conflict, inconsistency or ambiguity between the PUD Standards and the Applicable City Ordinances, the PUD Standards shall control. Ifar. amendment to any Appiicable City Ordinance results in any non -conformity `.within the Properri. such non -conformity may be continued indefinitely, as a matter of right, and shall be treated (for all pure_ ores) as a legal use of the Proper ,, to the same extent as if the non -conformity had .. eXi..ed. 4. CONCEPT PLAN. The PUD is being processed with the Concept Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B-l" and i:-icorporated as part of the PUT) for all purposes. The Concept Plan identifies (i? specific Natural .kreas withir. which development is restricted, (ii) the approximate location of major private streets, and (iii) the area .withir which parking structures will most likely be located. The remainder of the Property will be available for development in accordance with these PUD Standards and the Applicable City Ordinances. All development within the Property must be consistent with the Concept Plan. In the event of anv conflict or inconsistency between the Pl✓TD Standards and the Concept Plan, the K;D Standards shall control. Except as provided below, substantive changes to the Concept Plan shali be corside:ed a zoning chance to the PUD and shall be processed and approved in accordance •xich the Applicable Cirr Ordinances. votwithstandin2 the fore2oin2, however, the exact cor.ti;,ration of the private streets shexn on the 1.oricept Plan may be changed to accommodate the fnai design speed and �eometr: selected b;: the Properrr owner without such change constituting a zoning change to the PUD. A:;y such change based on the final selected design speed and geometry shall be provided as part of each sate plan. Information contained on the Concept Plan that applies to land outside the Property is not part of the 'PUD and is provided for informational purposes only. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The development of each portion, section or phase of the Property must be in accordance with a development plan that has been processed and approved for such portion, _ection or ohase in accordance with all Applicable City Ordinances. There shall be no phasing or timing requirement for the submission of development plans, and there shall be no minimum area for a -;velopment plan. Except as hereinafter provided, development clans shall not require additional or --da:ed t:-:_._ impact ana!vses unless the cumulative total floor area crcpesed for development within the P:eperi has exceeded the rr_,xY mum floor area assumed in the original traffic impact anal'+sls that was s,.bi;; :ed `.with the acplica:ien -or the PUD. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ho.wew=r, .. the original c _['act anaiysi3 does not address full build -out or does not include traffic cor.diticns for interim asps o? .._...iopmer , the Cirr may require an updated traf:.., impact anal. -is with each Gnce ro•._d, a development plan: s;:ail not have an ,piration dat-. This approach ._ deS;Zned a - ..atendeC to 2:1cw' a large development to be approved in concept and the constricted in ,hat it is -`_oi feasibie and is fir. ail_. c -o .ecui: a . iz:^.iy detailed Case No. ZA01-017 0I i 907.:0005:04; 5047.12 Agenda Item 7A Attachment G Page 13 EXHIBIT B" -.iopment o:a- :o be competed on a v_ ; large proles: when it is reco--sized ;hat uht project will be eases over se _raj :ears. The PUD, which is based cc _._ Cu—cept Plan, appro,.a; Jt a basic concept and may not be implemented until r_:. development plan approval for cc —;on. section. or chase 'as teen. nowever, the aporo`:a'..,...._ Concept Plan entities ow tors of the Prcper-v' to rely on, and implement by subsequently approved development plans, the rT,e, i. nsir:, and den of uses set forth in the approved Concept Plan. Each development plan must be in substantial conformance with the approved Concept Plan. Amend. ents to approved development plans shall be reviewed by the Administrative Official and, if deemed to be in substantial ,;onformance w;th the approved development plans, shall be processed and approved in accordance with _.. Acolica'ole Ordinances; otherwise, su ., amendments shall be processes as _ zan- —.—MM—le to the Rr D. o. SITE PLANS. T'ne development of each portion, secton or phase of the Property Tust be in accr�rdanc-. loth a site plan that has been processed and approved for such portion; section -or phase in accordance with 211 Applicable City Ordinances. 'There shall be no phasing or tiro:ng-require neat for the submission of site plans, and there shall be no minimum area for a site plan. Except as hereinafter provided, site plans shall not require additional or updated traffic impact analyses unless the total cumulative floor area proposed for development of the Property has exceeded the maximum floor area assumed in the original tr,tiic impact analysis that was submitted with the application for the PUD. Norvithstard:ng :he foregoing, however, if the original traffic impact analysis does not address full build oL't or does tact include trltt;c conditions for interim phases of development. and a an updated traffic impact analysis was not required as par of the approved development pian, *t.? Ciry nay require an updated traffic impact analysis with each site pian. Once approved, a site plan shall not have an expiration date. Th z approach is designed and intended to allow a large development to be approved in, concept, to then have development proceed though a series of phased development plans, -and finally -to have construction proceed through a series of phased site p!ans. The City recognizes that it is not feasible and is unrealistic to require a highly detailed site plan to be completed on a very large project when it is ;-.cognized that the project will be constructed in sections or phases over several years. Each site plan -rust be in substantial confot-Hance with the approved development plan. Amendments to approved site _. plans :hall be reviewed by the Administrative Official and, if deemed to be in substantial conformance .vith the approved site pans. shall be processed and approved in accordance with all A--p!icc^le Ciry t)rdinances: et ervis-., such amendments shall be processed as a zoning change tc ",e Km— t:SES. A. Permitted Principal Uses. 1. The intent of this PUD is to permit the broadest range of "lti^_li-tech° Iuses to accoirriedate fur:re technology changes in the fields of computer technology, information technologyi, data and information processing, and all services related thereto. Tee City recomiizes, however, that future technology changes may occur beyond those that can be described in the PUD Standards. The Administrative Official of the Cir, shall be aut.orized to interpret the folio-xin, uses to accommodate future technology changes so as to achieve . e intent _. PUD s::al; nermit those trincipa! uses set tore., inert.-- 9, e:.n Ccmpre,..nsi, Zenir.� On:inance. as amended. s,-a1 a:sc, per~.. "pariahg strlca:,es" a.... zatec rear cted access Ln-ry _ ints" as pnrlci-•a! _se_. _..r.:r.3 ._.uc No. 7A-9'9,-J:6 _z . SED lute 16, 1999 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZAOI-017 7A Page 14 Pie -. EXHIBIT "B" The PUD shall aiso nennit "hotel" and 'restaurant iwith or without outside dining)" as ai uses ii aporov: !d - a Scecial Use Permit pursuant to Section -, of the Zoning (%',...,_....,. as amended PAD shall also permit the following additional principal uses, subject, however to Me condition that no ceniticate of occupancy shall be issued for any of such additional principal uses until at least 400,000 square feet of office space within the Propem is occupied and being used as a comorate headquarters: • Cor-=un!cattOns tac:l'.r+' .....!'1d!.^.�. ^Li n^t limited t0, t3ClltC[.'S t.!aC ula:Ze satellite daces, antennas, radio towers, fiber optic lines, telecommunications equipment, and all related hard•.vare. scfnvare and service:. Ai! satellite dishes, antennas, radio towers, and similar communication equipment must be solely for use by the owner of the Property and occupants or users of the improvements located thereon (and none of such equipment may be sold or leased to Urd parties outside the PUD). All such equipment must be located within buildings or structures; or, if located outside a building, must be screened from view from all public roads. The location of all such equipment (including screening, as applicable) will be provided with each site plan. • Computer technology facility (including, but not limited to, facilities for research, development, marketing, sales and serrce, leasinz!rentai, maintenance and repair, dis^budcn,, and .varehouseistorage of computer hardware, software, and related sen•ices). • Conference center. • Data information processing center. • Information technology facility, including, but not limited to, facilities for research, development, m=keting, sales and sere ice, leasing/rental, maintenance and repair, distribution, and ware house/stora,;e of information technology- hardware, software, and related services. • Trainin, center. 3 Accessori uses. All accessory uses (including those described in. subsections "C" and ce!ow) must be operated principally for the development of or use of the Property as a ccr—,crate headquarters and must be operated principally to serve or benefit tenants, employees, :esu, vieitors and customers within the Property. The PUD shall permit those accessory uses set forth in Section 34 of the Zoning Ordinance, as they apply to the "0-2", Office District, as amended. Except as otherwise provided by these PUD Standards, accessory uses must comply Section 34 of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended. In addition, the following accessory uses j^a't be permitted: Covered pedestrian walkways. Peatbridges (designed to meet minimum NCTCOG standards). Communication equipment, including, but not limited to, satei!i:e wishes, antennas, radio tower. f ber optic lines, telecommunications equipment, etc. All satellite dishes, antz ,nas, radio toyer, and similar communication equipment must be solely for use by e o%,.ners of the Property and occupants or users of the inpro•r�ments located thereon an': nor.e of such equipment may be sold or leased to third pa^:es outside the PGt�). Al': ,^.ing Cup vo. Z09-056 Ju Ily 6, 1999 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 15 ,1 EXHIBIT "B" ;uch eauiement must be iocated within buildings or structures; or, if located outside a -uiiding, trust be screened from vie%v from all public roads. The location of all such =�:uior;.ent <including screening, as applicable) will be provided with each site plan. tiiities (including, but not limited to, utiiiry buildings and structures, utility' distribution lines, utility shop and storage, electric transformers, electric substations, telephone, eleca-' c, cable, and fiber optic switching stations, water and sewage pumping stations iabove and below grade), water storage tanks and pumping systems (elevated or above grade), and water, sewer, electric, and gas meters). _.-c^esscr; Uses Within Principal Use Buildings. The foilowing accessory- uses snail only be alloyed within the same building as a perrriiitted principal use without regard to the floor area of such accessory uses: • Batiks and financial irstirutions (i—ricluding :ATMs). Beaur< parlor/barbershop. • Day nursery or equivalent child care facility. Drug store. • Specialty retail. Health club; gymnasium. Job printing, lithography, printing, er blueprinting. Laundry/dry cleaning (drop/pick). Mailing service (private). Maintenance vehicle fueling and service. • Medical care facility/clinic. • Newsstand. • Post otnce (governmental). • Printing, engraving and related reproductive services. • Quick copy/duplicating services. • Recycling collection and/or storage. • Restaurant, cafe, cafeteria, or dining facility (with or without outside dining). • Secu;ty guard quay ers. • Shoe repair. • Stationery and, or book store. • Temporary residential accommodations for employees'customers,'visitors (Fnaeimum stz: shall be two consecutive weeks and full kitchens with cook tops shall be prohibited). +ar_..ewe,"storage (inside). D. Accessor; Uses on Sgnarate Building Sites. The foliowing accessory uses shah be allc,ed o l a separate building site without rcgard to the ' Ccr area of such . cc. sscr, 6 Zcn r3 Case No. ZP 9 REVISED July, 16,1991999 Case No. Agenda Item 0111�" 00°°S:1.1,kt' c' hment G ZA01-017 7A Page 16 _: liT''7ClS OR -- Pa,.! EXHIBIT "B" -re•i e . -ewe -., nen_ 0f ere _..es uses sh a'.l oe allowed as a prncipal use. L 3GCIi:OC. no certificate of cccucar:cv •shall pe issued 'ov the C[r; for anv of the tollowln? ac.esscr, '-'sCs 'innl i;l ez-nliicates of oc:, pant'+ have bee., issued by the .. for one or more ' ,=a: '.:se buildlnas [hat contain ...e 'g z2at?) a: leas[ 40,043,0 square feet o[ floor arza: _n., '? a: .east 400,000 square fee, of sucln print;cal use 11cor area are cccupled and used as a corporate headquarters: Community facilities uses: _. private oar'.ks: ional and o.-en space :L�'.1ciude pia; grounds, park-xa,-s, greenbelts, pcnds and lakes, botanical gardens, - --c een[ers, bird and wild';`'- sa ctuar,es, pedest ian paths, bicycle paths, and equestrian bridal [rails; athletic, health, and spot•. facilities to include p-ms, aerobic centers, spas, sw;tt ming pools; athletic fields, and sport/tennis courts; and d. other uses of a similar nature and character. Day nursery or equivalent child care facility. Health tits /;vmnaslum. n, ico^ verti-con if located at least 1,!j00 feet from (i) anv residentially zoned lot and 00 am: land located outside the Property and designated for single family use on the Cir/s comprehensive lard use plan; limited, however, to use by the owners of the Property and occupants or users of the improvements located thereon and subject to all applicable F.-�_-k requirements and approvals and subject to the designation of flight paths (on the applicable development plan or site plan) that do not result in the overflight of residential areas). An St3F shall be required if the proposed designated flight path will result in the overflight of any residential areas (which SUP, if granted, may limit the hou.-s cf operation). The Property ow-:er shall notify Lhe FAA in writing that any such heliportverti-port is "private" and not available for any public use. Unless otherwise a -proved by the City Council, the combined number of individual take offs and landings ( nc!ad rig henstopi'vert step trips) shall be limited to 20 per calendar month, and the oxner of the Property shall keen records which the City may review at any time. Norvithstanding the foregoing, however, the right to continue this use may be terminated b;: the City Council if the FAA (or any other federal governmental authority) takes any action that would preempt (or otherwise render invalid or ineffective) the take off and landing flight path limitations set forth above. Helistop. verti-stop port if located at least 1,000 feet from (i) any residentially zoned lot and (ii) any land located outside the Property; and designated for single family use on the City's comprehensive land use plan; limited, however, to use by the owners of the Properny and occupants or users of the improvements located thereon and subject to all applicable F .,k requirements and approvals and subject to the designation of flight paths (on the applicable development plan or site plan) that do not result in the overflight of residential areas). An SUP shall be required if the proposed designated :light path will result in the overflight of any residentia! areas (which SUP, if granted, may limit the :cur of operation). The Properr,, owner shall notiN the F.kA in writing that any such elistep.verti-stop is "private" and riot available for anv public use. Unless otherwise approved by the City Council, the combined number of individual take offs and landings including heiiportverti-poi. trips) shall be limited to 20 per calendar month, and the of the Plope r; shall keeo records which the Ci mnav ,eview at any time. Zar.irg Cut No. Z499-056 REVISED July 16, 1999 J l :90-,3r 05:0435047.11 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 17 _ C:7: -. Cs aRz ;-_ , ore p,,, c Case No. ZA01-017 Pz'2r __ EXHIBIT "B" Norxithstanding the foregoing, however, the ^2`a to certinue :his use ma•: be terminated t.^e City Council if the F:�.a (or any other federal aovernr.:en ai authonti) takes anv -...:cn :nat would preempt (or otherwise renter .nvalid or inef.._tioej the take o_`- and :ancinz flight oath limitat;ons set forth above. • Main tenarce equipment storage (outside/screened). Such storage shall be limited to use .he owners of the Property and occupants or users of improvements located thereon. No sterage will be provided to any person or business located outside the Property. • Maintenance vehicle fueling and service. • '.ted;cai care facility/clinic. • R=stagy an:, cafe, cafeteria, or dining facility (with or without outside dining). • Tem�crari residential accommodations for employees/customers, visitors (maximum stay shall be rxvo consecutive weeks and full kitchens with cook tops shall be prohibited)_ • Temporary construction materials storage (for each phase of development, limited to the time during which active construction is ongoing and for a period of 30 days thereafter). • Temrerwy construction office (for each phase of development, limited to the time during which active construction is ongoing and for a period of 30 days thereafter). 8. DEVELOPMENT RRGLLATIO\S. A. Height Buildings. Except as provided below, (a) no principal use building shall exceed six (6) stories above grade, nor shall it exceed ninety (90) feet in height; and (b) no accessory use building shall exceed three (3) stories above grade, nor shall it exceed forty-six (46) feet in height. _. Structured Parking. Except as provided bellow, no parsing structure shall exceed six (6; levels above grade, nor shall it exceed sixr. (60) feet in hei_ architectural Features.-srchitecrural feanires (i.e., pcnons of buiidings or struc=r s not intended for occupancy) which are integral to the architectural style of the building or structure (including spires, belfries, towers, cupolas, dornes, feature walls and similar features) shall not exceed fifty (50) feet above the height of the building; if freestanding, they shall not exceed one hundred forty (140) feet in height; and both (i.e., roof u:.eunted and freestanding architecture features) shall be subject to the 4: i residential proxia iti; slope requirement contained in Section 43.13(h) of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Special Equipment. Mechanical equipment, penthouses, ventilation equipment, sate,,, dishes, antennas, cooling towers, and other similar equipment shall not exceed ,he a.r al height of the building by more than txenty-five (_5) feet, must be screened, must e mtegal to the building, and shall be subject to the 4:1 residential proximir; slope requi-,-ment contained in Section 43.13(h) of the Zoning Ordinance. s Pitched Roofs. The height of a building (regard!ess of;­i:,is_ size) '.vith sloped Cr ._..eQ roots shall be measured to a point 15 feet above :he ?..^lest occupied flocr :eve!. The high point of the sloped roof may exceed the height !i :itatiors set forth above aximum ninety (90) ._�t) by up to thin; (35) fee, � 'cw to a maximum Agenda Item 7A _=ng case No. Z A99-0`6 Z':,SED July16, 1999 3 : ; 3�17.XM5:0435C47.12 Attachment G Page 18 EXHIBIT "B" height of one hundred tw•en-;-flve ( 1 25) feet and wall be subject to the 4:1 residential 7roximir; slope requirement contained in Secnon 43.13(h) of the Zonin, Ordinance. All ~easure-ments ; hail be from o-rade, as defined by Ordinance No. 430, Section. =.2. �- ,backs Front Yard. Except as provided below, the minimum front yard setback shall be 30 feer, however, up to 10% of the area of any building faqade may extend up to 15 feet into any required front yard to accommodate building articulation design requirements. Short ter visitor and customer parking shall be allowed in required rout yards. No -oft .;and adjustments shall be required to achieve consistency or compatibility wNijh 3u-oundin, or r�ture pubii; deve!oprcCni. =• Side Yard. Except as provided below, there shall be no minimum side yard setback. No side yard adjustments shail be required to achieve consistency or compatibility with surrounding or fsture public development. 3. 0 feet. Rear Yard. Except as provided below, the minimum rear yard setback shall be 1 =. Residential Proximiry Slope.-ot,.vithstanding the minimur.: setbacks set forth above, buildings within. 400 feet of property zoned for single family uses shall have a rn;' mum setback from the property line adjacent to such single fariiiy propert, of 40 feet or a distance that will riot cause any building to exceed a height produced by a 4:1 slope line from the single family property (as contained in Section 43.13(h) of the Zoning Ordinance), whichever produces the greater setback. �. S.H. No. 114. Notwithstanding the setbacks set forth above, the minimum setback along SH-114 shall be 50 feet. Proiections. Every part of a required yard shall be open to these;, unobstructed b;; a building, except for the ordinary projections of sills, belt courses, comices, and ornamental features not exceeding •13 inches. 7. Accessory Buildings. accessory buildings may be located an,rv'here within the Proeerr; (but not within any required setback). S. Measurement of Setbacks. Setbacks shall apply to all private streets within the Property and shall be measured from the right-of-way lire (whether established by platted ICE, easennen t, or other instrument). �taximuri Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage for all buildings (excluding Structures) shall not exceed 50% of the total area of the Proper-v. \13.<1mu:^:, Impervious Coverage. The maximum imperious coverage sha!! net exceed -. of the total area of the Property. door area. i :ere shall be no maximum floor area nano for any improve en,s; cowevtr, .=x-irnum :oral �`,CCr area within the Proper-/ (being the combination of [loon 3re3 for 311 -- pal uses and al-cessory uses but e'(ciudinQ parking structures) shail pe tG 3.5 m1111Cn Zoning Ciu Vo. ZA99-0.`5 -:U-ISEJ ZiE 6. (999 ;; ia)T.CCfAS:o.13S0.17.1? Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G Z A01-017 7A Page 19 Pz_r ?n EXHIBIT "B" PARIKI`'G GOADING �. Paran_ Spaces Ream-�d. A: least one park:ng space _hall be nro',idee for each 300 square fee: of "principal -use" floor area developed within the Proper-:. No additional spaces shy u shall be required for any accessorse floor area. B. Location of Parking Spaces. All required parsing spaces shall be leca:ed within the Proper^/' however no parking shall , be allowed within t:',• natural .�.* ;o;t e :, C ^ the Cpn( apt �kar.. Parking Space Size All parking spaces shall be at ;east 8`.,_ *_.: '�; de and IS feet Tong. S uc ral columns within any parsng structure may project into the perimeter of "head -in' parking spaces up to one half the cross -sectional area of the column. D. _Off -Street Lcadin /Service Areas. At least one off-sacet loadinz'service area shall be provided for each 200,000 square feet of "principal -use" floor area developed within the Property. No additional area shall be required for any accessory use floor area. Development of the Property as a private, campus -style corporate headquarters offers an opportunity to consolidate oadinz and service functions within one or more buildings or one or more locations. Such consolidated locations minimize the need for multiple loading%service areas and isolate large .ruck trai is to a few selected Iecations within the campus. Smaller scale distribution is then permitted. The location of such consolidated areas will be shown on all site plans. 10. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. A. Building Materials, Masonry Requirements. Buildings within the Property may be constructed of a variety of different building materials, and there shall be no minimum masonry requirement. Building materials shall include masonry materials, as defined in Ordinance No. �57, architectural concrete, architectural metal panels, ;lass, and other similar materials. Pre -cast concrete panels (including "tilt -wall") may be used for accessory -use maintenance buildings that a.-,- not visibie from public rights -of -way. In addition, the facade of any parking structure that is sibie east of tI_ park dedication land shown on the Concept Plan shall (if constructed of architectural concrete) include an architectural treatment (e.g., texture, color, relief, or detail). B. Reflective Glass. Any individual building facade may be 100% glass; however, no more :h an 80% of the total facade area of all buildings within the Property shall be glass. The maximum outward solar reflectivity of glass used shall be 35°;. Facade Ar iculation. It is the intent of this PUD to comply with the spirit and intent of :he City's requirement for building facade articulation standards; however, it is also the intent of :his PUD to avoid the imposition of a rigid mathematical formula to achieve such articulation. Consequently, this PUD does require that building facades include design x-ic:.,ation that will be approved with each site plan. Facade articulation may be achieved for individual buildings :`.rough a combination of design techniques including, but not limited to, projections, overhangs, and incisions,'cu:s. Facade articulation may also be achieved by considering the effect of (i) the .ccation of one building to another, (ii) the manner in :^ w.icn buildings are grouped, and Variations in architectural surface :r�-atmer.s such as CCiCr, texture, telref, and detail. The .acade articulations standards for parking structures 'xili ..:for somewha::r ne standards rcr buildings because of their intended use (i.e., stony_ .a.$).._ d :. Cuce esi-p Iexibility, and Case No. ZAOI-017 L..CITY DGCS CRD 10-::3.Do(: Page 27 Agenda Item 7A Zcnin3 -a e No. ZA99-0:6 Rf ISED July 16 1999 :�-,7 xrs.0aa=, ttaehment G Page 20 EXHIBIT "B" Ot sucn S^lctu'res from sp-i 1-1 wi ! oe .rP;n;rnal f`•t-;t.^..^.0 :S1•.lt;! OfStiC7 3.^.. �L'.:^e :asi :5 JI d�...;oDmZail. XCO:'.; JiP.1CP ra�,'1:ram Ctti' C011l^'u s. St._.....ral COnCrete SIB_, e!emems may :_main exposed it given some ar;. laecn;ral treatment L�.•�.. zolor, :eYIl:re, re::e', or detail). �. Roof Design Standards. All strictures shall be cons rutted with either a pitched roof, flat :oJf'tith a parapet, mansard tact; or any combination, thereof. All flat roof surfaces will be _Cr_,.ned from ground level views. Parking stnucture decks shall not be considered roofs. Roofs _: it31,^.v?i1S and elevator machine rooms and other slmli3: spaces shall ie e.12mmi from rooting esign standards so long as they are not be visible fiom S-e,,n i ievei. 11. SCREENING. The following improvements shall be screened from view from public rights -of - way iccated outside the Property: mechanicui equipment, rooftop appurtenances, satellite dishes, antenna;, radio towers, outside storage, trashir?cyc!ing receptacles, and off street loading/seriice areas. No screening shall be required from any rights -of -way within the Property, and no screening shall be required for any surface parking lots or for any parking structures. Screening shall be accomplished with mason.^:, landscaping, or any combination thereof. 12. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS. T ne size of the Proper^!, :h campus-sr.V' 'development being prepcsed. thea'.izaror of parking strut^.:es to rlirimize surface parking, and tee requirement for at least ?=': per;ieus cover will create a developed site with vast areas of open space That will include existing. natural vegetation, including thousands of mature trees. Consequently, there is no need for narrow butieryards (and the related planting requirements) typically required for much smaller commercial sites. Nevertheless, in addition to the natural vegetation and trees that will be preserved, additional landscape standards are required for (i) the Natural Areas shown on the Concept Plan, (ii) inte"cr landscape areas based on building size, and (iii) parking island landscaping for surface parking !cis. The interior landscape area requirements and parking island requirements are very similar to the Cin's existing requirements; however, more liberal planting credits are allowed for enhanced paving and to :reSerye existing trees. Such credits are appropriate for a campus -style development and will strongl': encourage retaining natural tree groupings and trees near furure building sites. Such credits will also and redluce the maintenance costs associated 'xiii, large areas of small shrabs and ground Co'•_1. Natural areas. The Concept Plan identifies Natural AL, gas up to �0 feet wide and larger at virrually encircle the Property. These Natural Areas will be preserved as permanent :,pen space, and, together with the park dedication, will buffer the Property from adjacent development. ith the exception of small security structures (i.e., "guardhouses"), no paved surfaces or _' i!dings or strictures of any kind may be located within the Natural Areas without site plan -:7_roval. Tne intent is to preserve these areas in a nanlral, undisturbed condition; however, -�_diticnal landscaping may be planted within them at the option of the Pronerr: ow;ler. Natural ?_gas may be ir::gated or left natural. interior Landscape Areas. Subject to :he reductions set forth below, t're amount of :=^or landscape area required within. the Property shah be computed based on all buildings _ din; parsing structures) within the Property. and fcr each building (excluding parking _.. __n;res) Shall equal ';01% of the !ar,est Moor area of such building. The following plantings _.. be : qu*r'•a w'lthin. the Properr% based on, file interior ';andscape a. ea as computed above: one ee per 5CO square feet: one acc_..... _ per ?CO square fe ,ore she b ' i 5 inch deciduous per 61) squ'ar_ ._ , and 10°o of such ....erior landscape area must be planted _ JC co,._.. These requ:,ed ni3:ain'Js silali be reduced as I01!ov,s: Z;.ni:;g Case No. ZA99-056 =07DOC lulu 16. - I-) Case No. Agenda Item :�_ Jf°05 0"s0'�itftachment G ZAOI-017 7A Page 21 0 EXHIBIT "B" .. E"Utin'T P'.a^r Credirs. tx:s.. ._eS %v n:cn are 50 feet O. a, IV bui ldin 2 _nail redo,.. the rtcui.ed plantings as 'oi!e, s: Size e, Exisrin, Tree ?'.antin-z Reductions Canco•. accent Shrubs 5' caliper 6 1" caliper 2 c; 3 12 i2° and greater _ _. 13 2. Substitute Plantings. One additional canopy .._., may be substirt..., for 110 shrubs or :CO square feet of ground cover. One additional accent tree may be substituted for five shrubs or 250 square feet of ground cover. 3. Enhanced Pavement Credits. For each square foot of enhanced pavement area, she required landscape area shall be reduced by 0.5 square feet, up to a maximum overall reduction cf 25%. C. Parkine Lot Landscaoina. ! . S:r acrured Parking The-_ Shall ae no landscapi = requirements applicable to park:ug strictures. 2. Surface Parking. Planter Islands. Planter islands shall be provided in all surface parking areas on the basis of 10 square feet of landscape area for each parking space provided. Where reasonably possible, each row of parking spaces shall provide .he required landscape area; however, islands may be placed near buildings, t rouzhout the parking area, or at the end of the rows away from buildings. T:-ese island requirements may be modified in situations where it would be elcial to combine an awkward or hazardous island into a larger island. P!ancer islands shall have a minimum width of eiorOt feet back-to-back if curbed or nine feet edge -to -edge if no curb is intended, and shall be 18 feet long. Planter island landscape areas count towards the total required interior landscape area. b. Existing Trees. The following varaticrs to the planter island ;e ui ements shall be permitted to preserve existing —ees. For existing trees, the , 1:- mum width of the planter island shall be as follows: S' caliper or less = 8 foot minimum width 6" — 12" caliper = 12 foot minimum width ,neater than 12" calmer = 18 foot minimum .,.'d,.h Plantins Requirements. A minimum of 301) of all planter islands shall _=,fain a minimum of one canopy tree (with the remaining area in s`:rubs, ground .._ gasses, or seasonal color). Planter islands`.thlch have !:?hr poles for the parking areas mav suvstiture two accenr -_es for the required canop,, Case No. ZA01-017 L. CITY DCc'S'URD=ROJI:.DO C Pa_ 29 - Zoning Gve Na. ZA99-056 RT' - —D !u!v 16, 1999 0 i 1907.00M:0435047. L Agenda Item Attachment G 7A Page 22 EXHIBIT " ii Zee. At ;east d0°0 of al; trees must be 4 inr.: saucer cr greater, and the _mainder must ce ^wo .nch caliper or grease.. 13. FENCING. Pe -mete-. ,ercir.2 risible from Si;-i i . will be �nstn red wrought iron, maso=.. other a-chitec u al metal, or any combination thereof. Other materials that are architecturally compatibe with : buildings visible from SH-114 may also be used if approved by a site plan. Fencing :hat is et risible from SH-1 14 and that is generally screened by ve2etation will be constructed of coated, dark-coicred chain lint. No fencing articulation shall be required The details of fence design will be provided as part of each site plan. 14. ACCESS CONTROL STRUCTURES. Access control structures that are visible from any ublic -_hts of -way outside the Property will be cons ructed of materai; that are the same as or substa^C:ai1•: similar to the buildings visible from such rights -of -way. Such structures may also be constructed of any other material that is architecturally correatible wit-': the buildings that are visible, provided such other materials are approved on a site plan. Access control s=uctures that are not visible from public rights -of -way outside the Property may be constructed of masonry, wood, architectural concrete, metal panels, or any combination thereof. 15. P.kRK-S/TRAILS/OPEN SPACE. Except as provided in the Concept Plan, there shall be no other requirements for parks, trails, or public open space. 16. DPJVEWAY REQUIREMENTS. None of the standards or requirements for driveways inciuded u: Driveway Ordinance No. 63.1, as amended, shall apply to the Property. However, all develcprne :t plans must inciude an "on -site" driveway and driveway -related traffic analysis performed by a professional traffic consultant; which analysis shall demonstrate; to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Council, that the driveway design does not create a traffic or safety hazard. 17. TREE PRESER`'ATION. A. Structured Parking. In order to mitigate the impact of large areas of surface parking (and .e substantial tree removal that would necessarily result), the Property will, be developed with at :east rx-o multi-!evel parking structures to accommodate at least 809% of the required parkin;. -_ most likely location for the parking structures (arid the location with the least impact on eating tree cove-) is the area identified on the Concept Plan. As provided by the City's existing Tree Preservation Ordinance, the "footprint" of such parking structures (plus wi area within six 'eet of the foundations) will be exempt from tree protection and tree replacement requirements. Because the use of parking structures will avoid paving large areas for surface parking, and because there is little design flexibility in the location of such parking structures, efforts to select 2a:a2e "footprints" that minimize tree removal will not be required. All parking structures must be screened from, Kirkwood Hollow by planting at least four canopy trees per 100 linear feet of _:-iron re fagade th at faces Kirkwood Hollow. Other Improvements. As provided by the City's existing Tree Preservation Ordinance, Buildable Areas for improvements other than structured parking shall also be exempt from -_= protection and tree replacement requirements. Notwithstanding such exemption, however, Property ow-e- shall use commercially reasonable efforts to identity Buildable Areas in an _.._-rpt to minimi« the removal of quality trees with a diameter of six inches or greater measured above t..e gourd. Such efforts shall riot, however, require signiticant relocations of .. �dua! Buildable Areas or require Buildable Areas to be located so as to significantly alter or _re!;% allot. ;.._ relationship of buildings, streets, and other improvements or otherwise aft.- _r adsersel;: affect the overall master planning for de eloeme- of the Property. Zzmng Case No. ZA99-056 2Ey7SED JuIv 16, 1999 J:I907.00005:0435047.12 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 23 CI .. a'S r;RD ._. _.._ .3U YJ Pi_e 10 ,,, Case No. ZA01-017 _. i : 7, CRD CAS -S 13CC Pic-_ _ . EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the Cite Council motion. Agenda Item 7A Attachment G Page 24 Case No. ZA01-017 ?1 - EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the City Council motion. Agenda Item 7A Attachment G Page 25 a City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT March 30, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-013 PROJECT: Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Country Estates - REQUEST: Nancy Squires is requesting approval of a rezoning to "RE" Residential Estate:. District. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Consider second reading of rezoning request. 2. Conduct Public Hearing ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Surrounding Property Owner Map (D) Surrounding Property Owner Letters (E) Ordinance No. 480-358 STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073) Case No. Agenda Item ZA01-013 713 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: Nancy Squires PROPERTY SITUATION: 2001 Peytonville Avenue being on the east side of North Peytonville Avenue approximately 750' south of West Dove Street. HISTORY: There have been no recent development applications on this property. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Country Estates, being 6.8 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: P&Z ACTION: P&Z SPEAKERS: COUNCIL ACTION: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District "RE" Residential Estate District March 8, 2001; Approved (6-0). None March 20, 2001; Approved (7-0) on consent. STAFF COMMENTS: No plan approval is required with a request for "RE" Residential Estate District. NACommunity Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2001cases\01-013Z.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA01-013 7B Page 1 Vicinity Map Old Orchard Country Estates 3 1 W ,00 I pr1EAs � i'��1`ZE vWAXE i 7� 1 ' I a � ST �. \ Z q O\:YtNpIF� (2OUG'E GP - APSES -- — OOp; O I�� DES 1AURE�w—y' "6EK LARKS N SOUT ���NYPT1 / r; `✓ / POD 01ON =s�Eerra —` a�—_. -;�sinacssu-- -' r"°'mucu- �: -✓ j osP �NAVX w v wuz A— vx 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet M W f S Case No. Agenda Item ZA01-013 7B IN Attachment B Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Old Orchard Country Estates Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. A. Paradis 1. SF1-A 1. Low Density Residential 1. 3.31 7. J. Paxton 2. SF1-A 2. Low Density Residential 2. 5.06 3. T. Goza 3. SF1-A 3. Low Density Residential 3. 4.86 4. J. Smith 4. SF1-A 4. Low Density Residential 4. 7.27 5. A. Tummarello 5. SF I -A 5. Low Density Residential 5. 0.98 6. J. Brewer 6. SF1-A 6. Low Density Residential 6. 1.08 7. P. Lemmel 7. SF1-A 7. Low Density Residential 7. 1.13 8. T. O'Connor 8. SF1-A 8. Low Density Residential 8. 1.02 9. R. Brugger 9. SF1-A 9. Low Density Residential 9. 1.08 10. R. Jones 10. SF1-A 10. Low Density Residential 10. 1.04 11. B. Wheeler 11. SF1-A 11. Low Density Residential 11. 1.23 12. J. Horn 12. SF1-A 12. Low Density Residential 12. 1.23 13. W. Reder 13. SFl-A 13. Low Density Residential 13. 1.01 14. W. Carlucci 14. SF1-A 14. Low Density Residential 14. 1.95 15. E. Dotson 15. SF1-A 15. Low Density Residential 15. 1.06 16. E. Dotson 16. SF1-A 16. Low Density Residential 16. 1.75 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA01-013 7B Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Old Orchard Country Estates NOTICES SENT: Sixteen RESPONSES: Five responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Mr. and Mrs. Timothy O'Connor, 1035 Brittany Ct., Southlake, TX, in favor, "We have no objection to the proposed rezoning". (Received March 1, 2001) • John F. Paxton, 1055 W. Dove Rd., Southlake, TX, in favor, " I may want to do the same thing some day". (Received March 1, 2001) • Carol A. Tummarello, 940 Brittany Ct., Southlake, TX, _in favor. (Received March 1, 2001) • Susan Jones, 1065 Brittany Ct., Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received March 5, 2001) • Patrick K. Lemmel, 1040 Brittany Ct., Southlake, TX, in favor, "with the following concerns: (1) number of animals; (2) proximity of structure to property line; (3) noise or odor problems." (Received March 8, 2001) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA01-013 7B Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO.480-358 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT M, BLOCK 1, OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY ESTATES, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 6.8 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF - IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT A-1;% }ISTRICT TO "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article Xl, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF -IA" Single Family Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA01-013 7B Page 1 Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA01-013 7B Page 2 requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, -and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Country Estates, and being approximately 6.8 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF -IA" Single Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA01-013 7B Page 3 Family Residential District to "RE" Residential Estate District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance wish the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA01-013 7B Page 4 That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any:portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA01-013 7B Page 5 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. Case No. ZA01-013 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Agenda Item 7B Attachment E Page 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA0I-013 7B Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Country Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in cabinet 388-118, page 41, plat records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 6.8 acres. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA01-013 7B Page 8 ti City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT March 30, 2001 CASE NO: ZA00-126 PROJECT: Gumm Professional Offices REQUEST: Sun Coast Architects, Inc. is requesting approval of a Rezoning and Concept Plan. ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading rezoning and concept plan request. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Concept Plan Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner Letters (G) Ordinance No. 480-359 (H) Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086) Dennis Killough (481-2073) Case No. ZA00-126 Agenda Item SA A BACKGROUND INFORMATION 0WNER: Charles C. Gumm APPLICANT: Sun Coast Architects, Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) across from Village Center Drive. HISTORY: None LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 2, John A. Freeman No. 529 Addition; and Tracts 2 and 2132. John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, and being approximately 3.6 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District; "0-1" Office District REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District AMENDED REQUEST: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District Uses TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Thoroughfare Plan Case No. ZA00-126 The Master Thoroughfare plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have 130' of right-of-way. .Adequate right-of-way exists for this road. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions E. Southlake Boulevard is a five -lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two-way, center left turn lane. The roadway will ultimately be widened to a seven -lane roadway. Agenda Item 8A Attachment A Page 1 Case No. ZA00-126 Current Traffic Counts Current traffic counts on Southlake Boulevard between Carroll Avenue and Kimball Avenue are as follows (See Table #1) Table #1 May, 2000 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 24hr West Bound (WB) (22,723) East Bound (EB) (19,743) WB Peak A.M. (1,306) 11 a.m.-12 a.m. Peak P.M. (2,238) 5 p.m.-6 p.m. EB Peak A.M. (1,848) 7 a.m.-8 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,129) 3 p.m.-4 p.m. Source: City of Southlake 2000 Traffic Count Report Proposed Road Network The proposed site will have three (3) accesses off of South Village Center Drive (Proposed Public Road). The proposed road will be a local thoroughfare with 60' of right-of-way. South Village Center Drive will have direct access on to Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). This will be a signalized intersection. Traffic Impact Staff has projected the following impact on the surrounding roadway network. (See Table #2) Table #2 L'se Sq. Ft. -�-- Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- i PM- IN OUT Lot 2-Bank 3,949---�� 1,0�61 28 22 19 110 Lot 3-Office 4,110 45 6 1 1 5 Lot 4-Office 4,110 45 6 1 1 j 5 Total 12,169 1 1,151 40 24 111 1120 i Source: Planning Department/ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 6"' Edition *Vehicle Trips Per Day The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on Southlake Boulevard. Southlake Boulevard carries approximately 42,500 cars between Kimball Avenue and Carroll Avenue with the peak traffic times occurring between 7 a.m.-8 a.m. and 5 p.m.-6 p.m. The site will generate 64 vehicle trips during the A.M. rush hour and 231 vehicle. trips during the P.M. rush hour. However, about 47% of the vehicle trips will be pass -by trips. Agenda Item Attachment A 8A Page 2 WATER AND SEWER: ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: P&Z ACTION: P&Z SPEAKERS: A 12" water line and an 8" sewer line exist on the south side of Southlake Blvd. This site is proposing an 8" water and 8" sewer extension to serve all lots. Table #3 * Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of Building Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estir.nates prepared by the Planning Department. January 18, 2001; Approved (6-0) to table at the applicant's request and to continue the Public Hearing to the February 8, 2001, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. February 8, 2001; Approved (6-0) to table at the applicant's request and to continue the Public Hearing to the March 22, 2001, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. March 22, 2001; Approved (6-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary dated March 16, 2001, accepting the applicant's agreement to change the zoning to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses, limiting the maximum building size of the back two buildings to 4,200 square feet, requiring the applicant to build an 8 foot trail, and limiting the height of the light poles to a toot and to shield the lighting on the ATM but to comply with State requirements for lighting of the ATM area. In Favor Qualified in Favor j Opposed j Other 2-- STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated March 16, 2001. N:`•Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-126ZC.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-126 8A Page 3 Vicinity Map Gumm Professional Offices HALL gR�ARWv"— gES - -i, NORTHWEST PKWY - -_ EAST_ --Q JC111C _— AUINsT W 0009 OUNTAIN PL ApD\�\ON 1��9 W E• MAY F G i ARK _�� EAS UTHI--KE BLVO ------_--. ----- GORgv� PARK PpN MIRON— BUS OLGR� LLI 71 O ES JON E', aT 0 ���-i �� �1()N09 M2UOR Li. r —• i � _-.___ ____ -7 G. .: CIE �— _ - —: —� — - — -- ---• -- T -- A 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet W N S E Case No. Agenda Item Attachment B ZA00-126 8A Page 1 Sb')C3L N011100V 938MOS rayne '3NV1H1f109 w d i HOo,B - i V E 'z S1Ol GNV t )10018 ' L iol p Ld7ONOOMUM 7VNOISSYYOWcr11UMD �S�� �U . I t ; 1 •.• O agii ¢ ! i i!"i+i "i6 111e E � �t i E Et • ••• l' ! !at ! !�i 9$afii Y4�c� 7f��t �� d is i W LL R-17 .6YOC / G6M.a 701 tS 'v eYJ IJb:NOJ 11Yl]e an : rtJn>woJ r.xrt c-J aJrat flylil3 rlJb]teloJ 11Yl]n . enJ rl]b>1Mp1 .3 a - a �u a]unJ fl]YJrn Y l 9 Ill�i _iP _ � _�-a S � 1 r:ri - �E e A]'i]nM 1 2 rG�e '2 lPl s _ 1 xIIl ,t tJ, 1 aJor 'z lai , � Q2Ib'A:�'ll10i1 J�Ib"IH.L(lOS � gge p yy pg ]n .9r •pp ew 'lie 1m,11n s I e i 0 Nits h t � ge��• � ��� � —gip I �Fla��sy� T.. � e yl� d• _ `���� � �� � � � I i� DTI '� •� ,�� �� � e REP 0 0€ w 8 i R k II yy � y�aia .6� �IYL a �� 6 I n i EIlSs M �a sl �1W � l5�9A9 ti � y z�83 I _ a RR 9 77 '7 ICI I B� �oents �i �S �aioz am n.fGGr.W S �'— .Ive9 - Nnllodr s:�tM ibrvllnn � .mcaz n.za.ac.ae b cca ra lay � y � motu.vJ nnu teJ Case No. Agenda Attachment C ZA00-126 8A Page 1 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-126 Review- No.: Two ect Name: Concept Plan — GUMM Professional Offices APPLICANT: Charles C. Gumm III 1723 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite #100 Southlake. TX 76092 Phone: 817/329-8421 Fax: 817/329-8520 Date of Review: 3/16/01 ARCHITECT: FC Le VRIER Sun Coast Architects, Inc. 2379 N. Carroll Rd., Suite #200 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone : (817) 424-4277 Fax : (817)329-7177 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/26/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE. CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086. Label trash and recycling receptacles and indicate that they shall be four sided with d metal Qate and shall be screened by a minimum eight foot (8') solid masonry screen and shall utilize similar masonry materials to the principal structure. Correct the location shown for the Gateway Church drive access onto F.M. 1709. 3. Show a left turn lane at the intersection of the proposed public street and F.M. (100' stacking, 100' transition or as approved by City Engineer). Informational Comments * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan approved by the City Council. All required plans must be submitted to the building department for review and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to Park Fees, Impact Fees for Streets, Water & Sewer, Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. The Preliminary plat is currently being processed. * This site will require approval of a Preliminary Plat followed by a Plat Revision or a Plat Vacation and Final Plat. Staff recommends processing a Plat Vacation and Final Plat rather than a Plat Revision. The preliminary plat is currently being processed. * This site falls within the applicability of the "Corridor Overlay and Residential Adjacency Standards" of Ordinance 480, Section 43, Part II & III. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan, the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-126 8A Page 1 • Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended. • Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended • Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as amended. - Spill -over lighting and noise per §43.131 and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all Nzreather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Specific Bufferyard and Interior landscaping requirements. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * Denotes Information Comment. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D Z A 00-126 8A Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Gumm Professional Offices --tom i NORTHWEs7 PKWY E ,As T Propertv Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. Chase Bank of Texas I. C-3 1. Retail Comme�cia; 1. 2.16 acres 2. Chevron USA Inc. 2. C-3 2. Retail Commercial 2..93 acres 3. Otr/Regency Tx Realty Hold 3. C-3 3. Retail Commercial 3. 13.08 acres 4. Wendy's International Inc. 4. C-3 4. Retail Commercial 4..81 acres 5. Southlake Land Ltd. 5. AG 5. Office Commercial 5. 13.70 acres 6. G. Barclay 6. SF -IA 6. Office Commercial 6. 1.Olacres 7. W. Willan 7. 0-1 7. Office Commercial 7. 1.00 acres 8. Bootstrap Investments Inc. 8. 0-1 8. Office Commercial 8. 2.07 acres Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-087 8A Page 1 A Surrounding Property Owner Responses Gumm Professional Offices NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received from within the 200' notification area: • Dennis Scifries, 301 Commerce St., Ste. 2876, Fort Worth, TX, in favor. (Received January 9, 2001). Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-126 8A Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO.480-359 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 2,AND ZB2, JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT `NO. 529, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 3.6 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE 'PLAN DISTRICT WITH "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT USES, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAIN ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 1 WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; . location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion o[health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 2 public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 3 Being Tracts 2 and 2B2, John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, and being approximately 3 6 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from 2` C gnc aural District to "S Pt2" C7eneralized��ite$PlM Distri.11t. ,"O?l" OfficeDstrictVuses as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit `B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official 'Zoning map. of_the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, .sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are. not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration e among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 4 and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. Ail rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 5 disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the MAYOR ATTEST: day of , 2001. CITY SECRETARY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the MAYOR ATTEST: day of , 2001. CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORNI AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being pacts 2 and 2B2 Johri:A Freeman Surrey, - %tract -No. 529; and being approximately 3.6 acles DESCRIPTION of a 3.60 ACRE TRACT OF LAND in the JOTTN A FREEMAN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 529 SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING a tract of land out of the JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 529, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all of that tract of land described in deed recorded in Volume 3254, Page 526 of the Deed Records -of.Tarrant:County, Texas (D.R.,T.Co.,TX.); and being a portionof that tract of land described in deed recorded in Volume 12202, Page 212, D.R.,T.Co.,TX.; and being all of that tract described in deed recorded in Volume 14079, Page 12, D.R.,T.Co.,TX., and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron pin found in the South right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. Highway 1907). said point being the Northeast comer of Lot 2, John A. Feeman No. 529 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, . Slide 2473 of the Plat Records of Tarant County, Texas, and being the Northwest comer of the herein described tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds East 283.06 feet along said South right-of-way line to the northwest comer of the herein described tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 52 minutes 02 seconds East 553.74 feet to the southwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 38 minutes 22 seconds West 283.06 fed to the southwest cornerof the herein described tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 52 minutes 02 seconds West 553.53 fed to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containg some 3.60 acres more or less. M NOV 2 7 Z000 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 8 Case No. ZA00-126 EXHIBIT `B" prw� MMM MM=7UPAL (AM J�"•&rr= CEPO'c"LM Agenda Item 8A Attachment G Page 9 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-126 8A Page 10 City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT March 30, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-017 PROJECT: The Clariden School Attached is a letter from the applicant requesting to withdraw the above mentioned case. Case No. ZA01-017 Agenda Item 8B T H E C L A R I D E N S CH O O L I; AHITF CH\P�L B,`l Lt\_oRr jw ?'L.\:a. rhi\S 7(;.,)01 8171 181 ,7�- , c\x (,�1; 421 5; F; '..\RICE\lCff`CI_.'RG Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake Attn. Bruce Payne 1400 Main Street #310 Southlake, Texas 76092 March 28, 2001 Dear Mr. Payne, Please withdraw The Clariden School's zoning change request for its 23+ acre site on N. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake which was heard by the city's Planning and Zoning Commission on March 22nd and 23rd 2001. If you require further information please do not hesitate to contact me or Charlane Baccus at 817/481-7597. poi - ��V 7 Sincerely. Liana Oram President, Board of Directors The Clariden School w City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT March 30, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-024 PROJECT: Tracts 2A11), 2A113, & 2A2, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No 899 REQUEST: Bryan Elliott is requesting a rezoning to "SF -IA" Single Family Residential Estate District. ACTION NEEDED: Consider rezoning request. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Surrounding Property Owner Map (D) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (E) Ordinance No. 480-361 STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817-481-2073) Case No. Agenda Item ZA01-024 8C err' BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/ APPLICANT: Bryan Elliott PROPERTY SITUATION: 201 Pine St. being on the east side of Pine Drive approximately 1,100' south of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 2AIB, 2AID, and 2A2, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, being approximately 3.0 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" REQUESTED ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District P&Z ACTION: March 22, 2001; Approved (7-0). P&Z SPEAKERS: INone STAFF COMMENTS: No plan approval is required with a request for "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District. The purpose of this request is to comply with city regulations for new home construction. A single lot plat has been submitted for staff review. NACommunity Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\200Icases\OI-024Z.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA01-024 8C Page 1 Im ,.e, Vicinity Map O.W. Knight E' aQ 17091SHADY F.M. t 709 ���4�- EAST SOUTH: �a i y IIGNPPEL\SA r— �^ ROGKE uN - v,N jjGJ60 LILAC T� NOD \ � cL� .TROOK ..P oVifINCETd+ CT I R�€Y� Case No. ZA01-024 We 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet O N S Agenda Item 8C E Attachment B Page 1 J Surrounding Property Owners O.W. Kn Abst. 899 Property Owner Zonine Land Use Description Acrea e 1. Whites Chapel Church 1. CS 1. Public/Semi-Public 1. 0.59 2. Whites Chapel Church 2. CS 2. Public/Semi-Public 2. 5.15 3. Whites Chapel Church 3. CS 3. Public/Semi-Public 3. 9.50 4. S. Garrett 4. CS 4. Low Density Residential 4. 10.00 5. C. Ezell 5. R-PUD 5. Medium Density Residential 5. 0.23 6. C. Fogliano 6. R-PUD 6. Medium Density Residential 6. 0.29 7. V. Mennella 7. R-PUD 7. Medium Density Residential 7. 0.24 8. R. Arnold 8. R-PUD 8. Medium Density Residential 8. 0.25 9. D. Quinto 9. R-PUD 9. Medium Density Residential 9. 0.31 10. Weekley Homes 10. R-PUD 10. Medium Density Residential 10. 0.25 11. E. Dubay 11. R-PUD 11. Medium Density Residential 11. 0.25 12. M. Farrell 12. R-PUD 12. Medium Density Residential 12. 0.25 13. D. Ledbetter 13. R-PUD 13. Medium Density Residential 13. 0.39 14. K. Head 14. R-PUD 14. Medium Density Residential 14. 0.69 15. M. Rubery 15. R-PUD 15. Medium Density Residential 15. 0.69 16. C. Meaux 16. AG 16. Low Density Residential 16. 4.38 17. G. Niemirowski 17. AG 17. Low Density Residential 17. 1.13 18. A. West 18. AG 18. Low Density Residential 18. 1.85 19. A. West 19. AG 19. Low Density Residential 19. 1.04 20. T. Tracy 20. SF-lA 20. Low Density Residential 20. 3.30 21. M. White 21. SF-lA 21. Low Density Residential 21. 1.22 Case No. ZAOI-024 Agenda Item 8C Attachment C Page 1 4W Surrounding Property Owner Responses O.W. Knight, Abst. 899, "AG" to "SF-1A" Im NOTICES SENT: Nineteen (19) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Heath D. Meyers, 520 Northwood Trail, Southlake, TX, opposed, " The lighting of the lot may be a nuisance. The soil has been unstable and needs to be checked (plausibly)." (Received March 19, 2001) • Kim and Patti -Kay W. Head, 501 Clayton Court, Southlake, TX, in favor, "strongly residential area." (Received March 20, 2001) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA01-024 8C Page 1 %-ity ul auutinatty, 1 CA213 MEMORANDUM March 30, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xt. 1527) SUBJECT: Call -A -Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) report/request for remainder of funding Action Requested: Approval of the allocation of the remaining stipend of $9,000 as indicated by the Scope of Services Agreement for FY 2000-2001. Background Information: City Council approved a stipend of $18,000 to be paid to CARS per the Scope of Services Agreement for FY 2000-2001. $9,000 was paid October 20, 2000 and the remaining $9,000 is due on or before April 1, 2001 provided CARS has been able to raise the additional $12,000 needed to bring their yearly budget to $30,000. CARS has raised the necessary monies and a representative will be present at the April 3`d Council meeting to answer questions and provide documentation. CARS provides free on -call transportation for disabled adult individuals and senior citizens (over the age of 55 years), who are residents of Southlake and whose physical condition permits them to be transported by the volunteer drivers. CARS transports to and from non -emergency medical appointments, dental appointments and health care providers located within a twenty-five (25) mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activity Center. CARS also transports clients for personal needs including grocery stores, drug stores, banks, personal grooming, and social activities located within a seven (7) mile radius. Financial Considerations: The Agreement calls for a total budget of $30,000 with the City paying a total of $18,000 for FY 2000-01 Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Senior Advisory Commission, as well as the Southlake Seniors, supported the concept of a senior transportation service and voted to make a formal proposal to city council at their April 13, 1999 meeting. Legal Review: Not applicable. Alternatives: City Council may deny funding if CARS has not raised the additional $12,000 needed to meet their annual budget of $30,000. 1OA-1 Billy Campbell, City Manager March 30, 2001 Page 2 Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include: • CARS Copy of Scope of Services Agreement FY 2000-01 • CARS Ridership Statistical Data • Council Minutes 10/ 17/00 Staff Recommendation: Place on the April 3, 2001 City Council agenda, consideration of allocation of remaining $9,000 stipend to CARS in accordance with the FY 2000-01 Scope of Services Agreement. N:\Community Services\CC\memos\O1\CARS MEMO.doc 1 OA-2 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AND CALL A RIDE OF SOUTHLAKE, INC. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Southlake, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation located in Tarrant County and Denton County, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized Mayor (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Call A Ride of Southlake. Inc., a non-profit corporation of Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized Chairman (hereinafter referred to as "CARS"), an organization exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. WHEREAS, the mission of CARS is to provide non -emergency transportation to senior citizens and disabled adult persons ("qualified persons"); and WHEREAS, City and CARS desire to enter into a Renewal Agreement whereby CARS will continue to provide free non -emergency transportation to qualified residents of the Southlake Community; NOW, THEREFORE, KNOWN BY ALL THESE PRESENT: That City and CARS, in consideration of the mutual undertakings hereunder set forth, do hereby covenant and agree as tollows: SECTION 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES A. CARS shall provide the following services: (1) Free on -call transportation for qualified persons of the City as follows: (a) Disabled adult individuals and senior citizens (over the age of 55 years) and, (b) Who are residents of Southlake, and (c) whose physical condition permits them to be transported by the drivers in the vehicles available, including an Activan with ramp for wheelchairs and motor chairs. (2) CARS will provide transportation to the persons identified in Section A. (1) above: (a) to and from non -emergency medical appointments, dental appointments. and health care providers located within a 25 mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activity Center; (b) for personal need, including necessary essentials, i.e., to and from the grocer\ store, drug store, bank, personal grooming, social activities, etc., located - within a seven (7) mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activity Center, N: COMMUNITY Y SERVICES\01 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOSOI .DOC Pave I 10 F%-b (3) CARS shall not be obligated to transport disabled individuals for whom CARS is unable to provide safe transportation. (4) CARS shall operate solely in accordance with its bylaws as follows: (a) Volunteer drivers who use their own vehicles shall provide the transportation services. CARS shall recruit, qualify, and train these drivers. (b) CARS drivers shall also use the ramp equipped minivan, owned by CARS, when necessary to transport wheelchair or power chair bound individuals or when a suitable volunteer owned vehicle is not available. (c) Transportation services will be provided Monday through Friday during the hours between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, or by special arrangement. (d) Transportation normally will be scheduled at least 24 hours prior to departure. (5) CARS will maintain detailed records of qualified persons served, trip destinations and mileage driven, driver and other qualifications, revenues received, and cost and expenses incurred. B. CITY shall provide the following: (1) City agrees to publicize and encourage use of the services of CARS within selected current City mailings, on the City's Cable Television Channel and other means at the discretion of the City. (2) City shall name a staff contact person to serve as a liaison between City and CARS. (3) $750 for an insurance premium to have the City named as an additional insured on CARS automobile liability insurance coverage. SECTION 2 GOVERNANCE A. CARS shall be solely governed by its board of directors, who shall meet in accordance with the bylaws. The time, date, place and agenda of these board meetings shall be the responsibility of CARS. SECTION 3 PAYMENT FOR SERVICES CARS estimates its Operating Budget for year 2001 to be $30,000. In recognition that the City elected to support the CARS transportation program rather than provide such service as a City owned community transportation service, and that CARS has successfully completed one year of operations, having commenced transporting qualified users in January 2000 as promised, City N:\COMMUN= SERVICES\01 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOSOI.DOC Page 2 1oA-Q� agrees to a 2' year stipend to be paid to CARS in the amount of $18,000. Upon the signing of this Agreement, $9,000 shall be paid to CARS and the remaining $9,000 shall be paid on or before April 1, 2001. If on April 1, 2001, CARS has been unable to raise the needed additional operating funds to cover the annual operating costs, CARS will plan to terminate the program effective July 1, 2001 and release the City from the second $9,000 payment. However, should the City desire to increase the second payment sufficient to cover the unfunded portion, then CARS shall continue to provide the service through December 2001. Payment by the City shall be applied towards the costs of the following: • Supplies and printing costs associated with promotion of CARS service to Southlake residents. • Telephone and other utilities associated with dispatching volunteer drivers. • Rent of office space from which to coordinate operations of CARS. • Maintenance and operations expenses, and insurance costs necessary for operating the ramp equipped Activan. • Personnel expenses. • Other operational costs. SECTION 4 REPORTING A. CARS shall generate and provide to the City monthly reports which shall include ridership information showing the number of riders and the types of trips. CARS shall also provide, as requested, expenditure records related to operating expenses, i.e., rent, telephone, utilities, printing and supplies, insurance and personnel expenses. City liaison shall have access to CARS operational records and all budget reports, during CARS normal business hours. B. CARS shall provide the City information, if requested, necessary for the City to conduct an performance evaluation including, but not limited to the following: (1) Ridership audits; a) On -time analysis; b) user surveys. SECTION 5 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION A. CARS shall provide City proof of automobile liability insurance coverage with minimum limits of $250,000/$500,000, with City as an additional named insured ti.. B. CARS AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST N:\COMMUNM' SERVICES\01 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOSOLDOC Page 3 10t-A,-5 ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS N'"' AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF CARS, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. CARS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES OR LIABILITY FOUND BY A COURT TO HAVE ARISEN FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY APPLICABLE INSURANCE COVERAGES. SECTION 6 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR In performing the services hereunder, CARS is acting as an independent contractor, and City shall have no power to direct or supervise its activities in carrying out its responsibilities under this Agreement. SECTION 7 TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from October 1, 2000 through September 30, 2001. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, either party may terminate this Agreement upon 45 days written notice to the other. Upon termination, or if CARS ceases to provide transportation services, CARS shall return to the City any unexpended funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. This Agreement sets forth all the agreemgtits between the parties and no modification shall be effective unless reduced to writipg and signed by the paxiy to be changed therewith. This document may be executed in duplicat, originals. N: COMMUNITY SERVICES\01 SERY;CE AGREEIvtInNTNL CARSSOSOLDOC 113ee 4 \COPS-6 11%wl IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and CARS have executed this Agreement as of this day of eC-14o1✓e,— , 2000, CALL A RIDE OF SOUTHLAKE g} Dic ton,Chairman •,...••..,,* . ATTEST: A', =r• Notary Public in and for the State of Hlno Texas Type/Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: CITY OF S Stacy, Mayor AS TO FORM City Attorney NXOMMUNI'FY SERV#CES\O1 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOSOLDOC ML LEGALITY: pap CARS Summary of User Use by Home Ciiy Period.-] 0101100- 212812001 City User User ID Number of Trips Grapevine Anderson Maedelle 2 12 Schneider Elizabeth 52 40 Simmons Mary 27 2 Summary for'City' = Grapevine (3 detail records) Total Trips for this City 54 Percent of All Trips 10.91 % Keller Shaffer Richard 47 8 Shaffer Ruby 67 4 Summary for 'City' = Ke#er (2 detail records) Total Trips for this City 12 Percent of All Trips 2.42% Soiahlake 1 6 Alexander Jeane Ammerman Sharon 53 6 Barcellona Veronica 69 2 Burnette Margaret 34 2 Cate Mabel 13 4 Douglas Sylvia 3 17 Franco Jose 68 2 Greene Ouida 14 6 Habeck Ken 63 10 Hoger Mary 8 4 Lafkiotes James 38 2 Lafkiotes Regina 39 14 Land Clarissa 18 51 Mallman Ann 19 12 McElhiney Mike (Wm) 66 68 Peery Frances 21 2 Purvinis Marie 22 1 Schreiber Bernice 41 23 Thurcdav, Varch 22. 2001 1'uge I of 2 ,b1-% ,,. City User User ID Number of Trips Schreiber Willie 42 4 Scribner J.W. 58 30 Shuping Estelle 26 3 Tkadlec Annie 62 4 Tristan Jenny 64 8 Vann Lula 59 60 Weiser Fran 31 30 Wood Martha 32 58 Summary for 'City' = Southlake (26 detail records) Total Trips for this City 429 Percent of All Trips 86.67% Grand Total Number of Trips 495 Thursday, March 22, 2t)01 Page ego.� 2 r •V y rV L v L 0 L V � v N ell •R O p c O � y Q 'L. y r ;0� a s L C� f V �I fl p\ O epe`�� tl' M (� NLd ^ v In if) O ^ C.) Oi QQ O C N �•- `t Of (D (p e- er Q a N N ^S n N V) p� OR h (C N O (o O ch O T e- V 7 C4 � (`i CV) N N co co ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ w U m� a c CL c c c a c .a c ed � eC u ed v ea u � u eC u ❑ L �� ❑ F a F a F a F a F a F a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ L� ® ❑ sz: ti r ZS o o ❑ ❑ O ICI N iJ © N 4 J N COLO Cp M O O V1 Os r (D pm ri C7 vi OOi 1� CM Q o p Cm N OV p S O N N N b d• o CA Cl) 7 O CO O O (O O N N 00 CD N N tl' f7 N h NN (O N N' N N y Q ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑® �a 7a is 7a v ❑❑❑ c Elc Elc ❑❑ o ❑❑❑❑❑❑ o c. ea u � u ee u as � ee u ❑ E a ❑ E� 0: Li F a El El E: p, ❑❑❑❑®❑ ❑ © ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ F'S❑❑ ❑ ® ®❑ ❑❑N❑❑❑ Iri❑❑ Items from the 10/17/00 City Council Meeting Minutes Work Session: ✓ Agenda Item #10-C, Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Scope of Service Agreement with Call A Ride of Southlake (CARS) for 2001. Richard (Dick) F. Johnston presented this item and stated, "We feel this is a very worthwhile and needed program for Southlake. The individuals needing and utilizing the program cannot afford to make rider donations sufficiently high enough to sustain it. Twenty-one volunteer drivers have contributed vehicles and fuel or 770 trips covering 7,317 miles through the first nine months of year 2000. Volunteer drivers and office workers have given 1,075 hours to the program. Therefore, if the businesses and residents of Southlake and the City Council are unwilling to provide $30,000 annually for operating this service, then the Board of Directors of CARS will feel comfortable in shutting this non-profit service down." Mr. Johnston stated CARS was agreeable to receiving $18,000 in two $9,000 payments. One payment before December 1, 2000, and one before April 1, 2001. If they are unsuccessful in raising the necessary $12,000 additional funding by April 1, 2001, they will ask the City to either provide additional funding or retain the second $9,000 and they will shut down the program effective June 30, 2001. Councilmember agreed to place this item on the consent agenda. Regular Agenda: Agenda Item #5, Consent Agenda Mayor Rick Stacy informed the audience that "consent" agenda items, which consist of several items, are considered by one vote. He said if anyone had a request for an item not to be considered during the consent agenda segment, that item would be deleted from that portion of the agenda and considered separately. The consent agenda items were as follows: 5-A. Approval of the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held October 3, 2000. 5-B. Resolution No. 00-90, Designating "Southlake Public Library" as the official name of the city library. 5-C. Approve Resolution No. 00-91, authorizing the Mayor to execute a multi -use agreement with TxDOT for the construction of Traffic Management Bond Program trails along FM 1709. Vz)p'a 5-D. Award of bid to Miller Sierra Contractors, Inc., for the construction of the Traffic Management Bond Program trail along the north side of FM 1709 from Southbridge Lakes Parkway to Bicentennial Park. 5-E. Award of bid for furniture at Town Hall. 5-F. Approve purchase of furniture for Town Hall from Tarrant County contract list. 5-G. Approval to have single Regular City Council meetings in November and December due to holidays and the move to Town Hall. 5-H. Award of bid to Sutton & Associates, Inc. for the reconstruction of Burney Lane from Carroll Avenue to Lonesome Dove Avenue. 5-I. Approval of a professional services agreement with Cheatham & Associates, Inc. for the engineering and design of the reconstruction of South Carroll Avenue from the west property line of Noble Oaks Park to Continental Boulevard. 5-J. Authorize the Mayor to execute an Advanced Funding Agreement with the State of Texas for the installation of a traffic signal located at FM 1938 and Continental Boulevard/Union Church. 5-K. Removed from consent agenda. 8-B. Ordinance No. 762, 1' Reading, Amending the Code of Ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, by adopting the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code, Volumes 1 and 2; repealing Ordinance No. 572. 10-B. Award of bid to Media Consultants Systems Integrators (MCSi) for the audio/visual system at Town Hall. 10-C. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Scope of Service Agreement with Call A Ride of Southlake (CARS) for 2001. Motion was made to approve the consent agenda consisting of the following: Agenda Item #5-A, #5-B, #5-C, #5-D, #5-E, #5-F, #5-G, #5-H, #5-1, #5-J, #8-B, #10-13, and #10- C as presented. Motion: Standerfer Second: DuPre Ayes: Standerfer, DuPre, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS \�q--►'\:'-� In In o Improves language to become more specific with city expectation; o Improves the high -piled combustible storage requirement; and o Amendment includes the requirement for residential sprinkler installation in homes 6,000 square feet or greater. 10-B. Award of bid to Media Consultants Systems Integrators (MCSi) for the audio/visual system at Town Hall. City staff and the audio/visual consultants developed specifications for the audio/visual system for Town Hall. The audio/visual system includes components in Town Hall to provide for presentations in the council chambers, courtroom, executive conference room, training rooms, etc. Equipment is included for filming and taping of meetings in the council chambers. The City's construction manager, H.C. Beck, will oversee installation of the audio/visual system Two bids were received with the low bid from MCSi in the amount of $394,528. The change order is necessary because the audio/visual system was not included in the base building contract with Beck. Adding Beck's fee brings the total of the award of bid and change order to $407,360.49. 10-C. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Scope of Services Agreement with Call A Ride of Southlake (CARS) for 2001. CARS is agreeable to receiving $18,000 in two $9,000 installments; one payment before December 1, 2000 and one before April 1, 2001. If they are unsuccessful in raising the necessary $12,000 additional funding by April 1, they will ask the City to either provide additional funding or retain the second $9,000 and shut down the program effective June 30, 2001. \C�1- K- V�- City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 27, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Rick Black, Interim Director of Public Safety (Ext. 2421) SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Costco Wholesale located at 2601 East S.H. 114. Action Requested: City Council consideration of a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A. Background Information: The Costco Wholesale building is in the Gateway Plaza Shopping Center Phase II Lot 1 Block 1. Rob Barnes with Costco Wholesale has requested a variance to erect signs as shown on the attached plans. This would vary the following sections of Sign Ordinance No. 704-A: Section 2 LA. 1. ATTACHED: the ordinance calls for banners to be attached to the structure. Costco seeks to display banners not attached to the structure. Section 21.A.2.a. MAXIMUM AREA: the ordinance calls for a total number not to exceed 50 square feet. One of the proposed banners is oversized at 120 square feet. Section 21.A.2.b. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: the ordinance allows one per site: Costco combined with the Optical Center allows for a total of two signs. Costco seeks to display two additional banners to address both the "Now Hiring" and "Grand Opening" issues. Section 21.A.2.c. Duration: the ordinance allows the posting of banner signs for 15 days at a time, twice per calendar year with a sixty day separation between permits: Costco seeks to display the banners mentioned above beyond the allotted 15 day duration and without a sixty day time separation. Staff notes: Costco is currently displaying two banner signs, one along S.H. 114 and one along Southlake Boulevard. Because of the difficulty in drawing sufficient numbers of applicants, they seek to extend the time period for these signs through April 26, 2001. In addition, they seek to erect two wooden sign structures with the banners affixed to the signs to display "Grand Opening" information between April 12, 2001 and May 12, 2001 with one of the banners to exceed the maximum allowable area. 10B-1 Billy Campbell March 29, 2001 Page 2 Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None Alternatives: The council may approve the request, deny the request, or approve it subject to whatever conditions they deem appropriate. Supporting Documents: Variance Application Form Sign Drawings Ordinance No.704-A, Sections 16. 4, 7 Staff Recommendation: Place the variance request on the April 3, 2001 City Council meeting for approval. RB/sv On 1OB-2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION j; APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: Rob Barnes Same ADDRESS: 2601 East State Highway 114 PHONE: (817) 442-8824 FAX: (817) 442-8354 The_followine information pertains to the location for which the variance is being requested.• NAME FO BUSINESS OR OPERATION: Costco Wholesale 9669 Southlake PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 2601 East State Highway 114 Southlake, Texas 76092 LEGAL DEXCRIPTION: Lot 1 & 2 Block 1 Subdivision N/A I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements o the Sign Ordinance No. 704 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a representative at the City Council meeting who ' a�th izes to discuss this request. Applicant's sig ature: Date: 3LI% �O 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 704 and Amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance application. V Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested \\ variance (see attached) Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are extempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches \ and adjoining street R.O.W. \y Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 1OB-3 Demonstration Please demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the requested sign variance: That a literal enforcement of the sign regulation will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. • The current permit for the "Now Hiring" banner expires on March 24. We would like to have it extended until April 26. Currently we have no access to our site, which makes it very difficult to attract potential employees to our trailer. On the Southlake Blvd side of our site our building cannot be seen due to Nolan Drive work being done and the trees that set in front of our trailers. Heading east bound on Highway 114 we sit behind the Lowe's site, which makes it extremely difficult to realize that there is a building being constructed. In addition there is no access to us from Highway 114. If you are heading west bound again there is no access and with the construction on the 114 in progress it is both difficult to see our location and get to. • We are also seeking a variance for two additional signs to be placed on the site beginning April 12 and ending May 12. This would require a variance to the maximum 15 days, twice per year, 60-day separation between permits requirement. These 2 signs would have Costco Wholesale Opening April 27th on them and at opening would change to Costco Wholesale Now Open. We would place one sign off of Southlake Blvd, which would meet the required 50sf. The sign we would like to place on the building visible from the Highway 114 would be 100sf, which would require a variance as well. That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. • The situation causing our practical difficulty is that out site is not very visible from either Highway 114 or Southlake Blvd. We are not located on a corner with a signal light to hold someone in place long enough to notice that actual construction of a building is taking place. On the Southlake Blvd side of our site trees that eliminate our visibility block us. On Highway 114 our visibility is blocked by highway construction as well as our neighbor Lowe's. 3. That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. • The variance will not injure anyone. The signs that are in question will be anchored to a permanent structure. The properties that are adjacent to our site and the site that the trailers are on will cause no issues and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of the adjacent properties. To the east is an undeveloped site, to the west is our neighbor "Lowes", to the south is a site that is planned for development in the immediate future, and to the north is the State Highway 114. 10B-4 4. That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. • Costco Wholesale only places signs on our buildings at the opening. We only use these signs one time. Each sign would be brand new, We would attach the signs to a wood frame to have the cleanest look possible; this would also reduce waving or flapping of the signs to near none. There would be no unsightly ropes or cables hanging from them. lOB- 5 H i i J iI I �! �b� O 0` "' Q _' __ { :, I' i 111 I I 1 Vi II 3iyyiu3k IU. U. U. a rV m I N N N fr/1 N N N! ci N ri n a0 rp� H� 8 a O I W O W O ow 1 3 0 3 Z J Y Oga "�g N m Omm x 0 L UmN mom j SSX' O r U W�m7 o ui O m Z m W O O Q O QW Q V Y Q r2 G ap W ¢ r- Z U r O z [9Zm O C9-O mO O2 V.j C9 Z W W 0 Ja O OU Q `L Xb'� = J OO J JW r cc m.2, r m Yr RZ WF K= ma rm 'O-o ^ u m LL a > >oO < 600g0 Ou m mrr a s r zo IL QO OS� ai am z Ii<Ll o�� w1 ov,l •11^i '.IG •m•, ,.L Wi[I •au�'sa�epossy pue uJOH-48PIN �M® 1. H V) x _g a . U d y.QVOII ZZVfiINI7I I1f1M�IJ1 51��(c� (INV 'QAZH XXVZHMOS alvMOHM OJisO:) a � oa F77710 �E 119 Milli I Millill�-iiiii er _ T — qi` w.b r— rs.iruo .—e.c ]W 1 -- z� TILL_ as ..L ,pis I n EEEE ao st § AIP !S gF OF1k;f 5 ti f;�4 y j ��qa i y i a R pp5 pp� !! ■E 8zs e Y � gg as g a��j�ic e p� 0 N t CO The following sections have been excerpted from the Sign Ordinance No. 704-A 'EC.14 VARIANCES `W The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Signs may not be attached to light fixtures, poles, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, streets, utility poles, public buildings, fences, railings, public telephone poles, or trees. The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a three (3) square foot area used for building identification. 2. MINIMUM /MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six (6) inches. The maximum height allowed for letters or logos shall be based on the following criteria: Distance From R.O.W. * Less than 100 ft. 101 - 150 ft. 151 - 200 ft. 201 - 250 ft. 251 - 300 ft. 301 and greater Maximum Letter/Logo Height 12 inches 18 inches 24 inches 30 inches 36 inches 42 inches * - For any lease space that does not front on a street, the maximum letter/logo height shall be based on the distance from the vehicular driveway access (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). 3. MAXIMUM AREA: 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet (see Appendix 'A' for further clarification). 11: 4. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one attached sign per lease space shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. A secondary sign may be permitted at a public entrance, provided the entrance is on another side of the building, but shall be limited to twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary or permitted sign size, whichever is more restrictive. The six (6) inch minimum letter/logo height will not apply to these secondary signs. No more than two (2) attached signs shall be allowed per lease space. Attached signs shall be located within the first story of the main exterior entrance for a building or lease space (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent (75%) of the width of any building or lease space. In the event the lease space facade is horizontally articulated, the 75% rule shall apply to the allowed sign to be located on any single plane facade (see Appendix 'B' for further clarification). 6. ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof line of any building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend above the parapet wall. Signs shall be no closer vertically to the eave of the roofline or overhang than the predominant letter height (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). Signs may be attached to a continuous plane fascia, if the sign does not extend above or below the projection of the fascia. Signs attached to fascia are only allowed when attached to structural canopy supported to the ground by columns constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure (See Appendix `B' for further clarification). 7. ILLUMINATION: Attached signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting. Exterior letters with exposed neon lighting are not allowed. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") from the building, excluding signs attached to canopies. 9. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any facade (other than the main front of the building) which faces property zoned for single-family residential uses if the sign is within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the property line of said residential property. SEC. 21 TEMPORARY SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT A permit shall be required for the following signs: A. BANNER 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM AREA: 0.5 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed fifty (50) square feet. b. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) per site C. DURATION: Maximum fifteen (15) days, twice per calendar year with a sixty (60) day separation between permits. 1OB-10 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 26, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Rick Black, Interim Director of Public Safety (Ext. 2421 SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Big Bowl Fresh Asian Cooking located at 2700 East Southlake Boulevard. Action Requested: City Council consideration of a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A. Background Information: Big Bowl'Fresh Asian Cooking is a restaurant to be located in the Gateway Plaza Shopping Center Phase II , at 2700 East Southlake Boulevard. Terry Wilkinson of Wyndham Properties Ltd. and Brinker International are requesting a variance to erect signs as shown on the attached plans. This would vary the following sections of Sign Ordinance No. 704-A: ♦ Section 16.A.3 to allow larger sign area than permitted. Ordinance allows sign area equal to 75 % of store frontage which, in this case, would allow a maximum square footage of 119 square feet of sign area. The requested sign is 129 square feet which is 10 ft. (8%) larger than the allowed area. Letter heights are within allowable height restrictions based on the Gateway sign provisions, however, a bowl and chopsticks are added elements of the main sign and present a profile 56 inches high. This is 26 inches higher than the allowed 30 inch letter height stipulated in the Gateway provisions. This additional height is calculated in the 8% additional area mentioned above. ♦ Section 16.A. 4 to allow one additional attached sign. The ordinance allows one sign per street frontage with no more than two in any case. The Gateway sign provisions do not affect the ordinance in this case. The total number of signs requested above the number allowed is one. ♦ Section 17. I. ROOF SIGNS to allow a roof sign. The main sign, while not extending above the main roofline, does rest on the roof of the entry to the structure and is prohibited under section 17 .I unless granted under a variance. Staff notes that the main sign wraps around the corner of the structure and thus interpreted the store frontage as the entire length of the south and west elevations when calculating the allowable area. The bowl and chopsticks are calculated in the area listed above. The "To Go" sign located on the east elevation is allowed as a separate premise sign pointing out the separate entry and is not included in the additional sign in the variance request, thereby limiting the number of additional signs to one. 10C-1 Billy Campbell March 26, 2001 page 2 Financial Considerations: Citizen Input/ Board Review: Legal Review: Alternatives: Supporting Documents: 10410. Staff Recommendation: RB/bls In addressing the bowl and chopsticks elements, staff notes that other locations have raised similar issues and each has been regarded on a case by case basis as the specific elements were affected by proportionality of logo to letter height. Examples are McDonalds which was allowed a smaller logo than requested as opposed to larger letters, and Chick-fil-A which was allowed a large C in proportion to the other letters in it's sign because of the legibility issues if a smaller C had been used. This allowed them to maintain a legible nationally recognized logo. Big Bowl feels the bowl and chopsticks represents their nationally recognized logo. Not Applicable No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. None The council may approve the request, deny the request, or approve it subject to whatever conditions they deem appropriate. Variance Application Form Sign Drawings Ordinance No.704-A, Sections 14, 16. A. 3, 16. A. 4, 17 .I Place the variance request on the April 3 , 2001 City Council meeting for approval. 1OC-2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION APPLICANT NAME: Brinker International ADDRESS: 6820 LBJ Freeway OWNER (if different) Terry Wilkinson Wyndham Properties, Ltd. Dallas, TX 75240 751 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 130 Southlake, TX 76092 PHONE: 972/770-9155 817/329-4599 �.. FAX: 972/770-9467 817/488-2420 The following information pertains to the location for which the variance is requested NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: Big Bowl Fresh Asian Cooking STREET ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 Block- 1 Subdivision Gateway Plaza Phase II I hereby certify that this applica 'on is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 704 as summarized below. I further un erst d that t is nece 'ary b have a representative at the City Council meeting who is authorized to d's ss th�s requ t. // /t March;15, 2001 Applicant's signature:Q Date:__ The following checklist is a summary of tequirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No.704 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. N. x X Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached.) . Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R. 0. W. Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 1OC-3 Demonstration Please demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to therequ.ested sign variance: 1 That a literal enforcement of the sign regulation will crate an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant We are requesting a variance of the sign ordinance to allow for a 3-D Bowl to be allowed as part of our signage. The "Bowl" is our identity; without the Bowl and Chopsticks, the public is unaware of the type o-f'-rood we provide. By denying our request, we will be denied the opportunity to advertise who we are. 2. That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. While the ordinance does not allow for a sign to be installed on a roof, it does allow for canopy signage. We are proposing to install the Bowl on top of our entrance canopy and not on the roof. Although our signage is unique, it meets the requirements of the signage ordinance. 3. That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. The variance will in no way cause harm to the project. It is in keeping with the retail use within the development. The requested sign is our brand identification similar to the Nike "swoosh". 4. 'That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. The sign ordinance is designed to protect the city's interest regarding aesthetic -quality of signage within the community. Our signage is both architecturally interesting and in keeping with the spirit of the sign ordinance. 1OC-4 BY MIKE LEE sua-Tc1cgm n stuffwriter SOUTHLAKE — A giant rice bowl: may force Southlake leaders to decide if they favor their stomachs or their eyes. Brinker International, the company that runs Chili's, Mac- aroni Grill and other theme restaurants, wants to build an Asian eatery called Big Bowl on Farm Road;1709 (Southlake Boulevard), the main road through the city. And just as every Chili's fran- chise has a chili pepper over the front door, Brinker wants to put a big, red bowl atop Big Bowl. The proposal calls for the bowl to be 7 feet; 6 inches in diameter, not including the chopsticks. A recent survey indicated that many Southlake residents want new restaurants, but the City ' ncil is also finicky about the '-�:arance of the city's build- ings, especially along Southlake Boulevard. In the past two years, council members have debated whether to allow the trademark blue roof atop an IHOP, and have spent more than an hour mulling the benefits of a toolshed behind a Chik-fil-A franchise. In Octo- ber, the council ordered a McDonald's restaurant to shrink its trademark arches from 42 inches to 36 inches on a high- way sign.. The council approved the Big Bowl site plan.Tuesday, along with a permit to sell alcohol. But it won't vote on a variance for the bowl until April 3. . "If we vote on this and don't approve the bowl, they're going to have to call it `Little Bowl,"' Mayor Rick Stacy said. , That's not a good idea, said Doug Cobb; who represents Brinker. . "We have tried a little bowl on some locations. Architec- turally, the proportions didn't work," he said. Councilman Gary Fawks said he expects some discussion of the bowl, but no delays. 'Tthink the citizens have indicated that they want new restaurants," he said. 10C-5 Mar-19-01 03:03pm From -Brinker Int. 972 770 8856 _ T-526 P.005/000 F-510 [.7b a 2S qq ll�j� Ui 3t �� !aa as �� v'a � tg�• pLO S ociir a4ez3 6 p a .' q n 0. d U_ o C. h N ABR #:3 ppW a 0 z 0 53 v Z� yb QO ao O � m r� •Q . Ejgo $oo- Est-gl Inn o d y bo Y - All, 1 • Now { .Q .} LL cn Y • W .-1 U_ II^^ 10 V Z { W { LLI Q v0 �� • to Lu a �4 z� O uj � d7 ll I 1 i a i 1OC-6 aj-1 Al M_i FE E N LLI CL EE am d can cc O o��`n_: �aaE E z C') cLO d aNi c �6�:a pSJ Z v�NO Q U 0 U N U ;nn a,p MW Z w dm =W LL- Z Z W O Z .a � O R rx m 5 0 y Y=o WW kayo3 OC) ro LU Z o d ¢ 111Wzjj e c7 Z pO C 2 Q ? CQ w ca W RE io CA qCM W J \ O m o N c/c)� CD LU ui \ . CD W Q O W ti w Q N C G 11 uj D U iC N U m IOC-7 • !s j� 6 L i t Sp O w •�4 �Qi �tGl C ae Rig'n cl 7 e 3$j Y ..winOW 1 loc-8 r C/� Z5 Ali iL w _ S: .. '^`�' m � • N: R y CS O N A ^v1AA(Cx` 2 0 �g CV o � U 'HS4 r w rtR` dw I N IOC-9 Q66 hit y a iH a Z � iIII RIM i.� .0 LO Z me V c h O •c 6 p all z v,N •--• � 3 ` ti h � N .s � { C� O C LO N iu e � Q [� � � : ! � 0 W loc-10 A Q W W w cn y W t YAI � rr��o L 10C-12 I;s z 0 Q W J W W F N Q W � A � IOC-13 a P ,o O Z The following sections have been excerpted from the Sign Ordinance No. 704-A EC. 14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self- imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Signs may not be attached to light fixtures, poles, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, streets, utility poles, public buildings, fences, railings, public telephone poles, or trees. The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a three (3) square foot area used for building identification. 2• MINIMUM /MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six (6) inches. The maximum height allowed for letters or logos shall be based on the following criteria: Distance From R.O.W. * Less than 100 ft. 101 - 150 ft. 151 - 200 ft. 201 - 250 ft. 251 - 300 ft. 301 and greater Maximum Letter/Logo Height 12inches IS inches 24 inches 30 inches 36 inches 42 inches * - For any lease space which does not front on a street, the maximum letter/logo height shall be based on the distance from the vehicular driveway access (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). MAXIMUM AREA: 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet (see Appendix 'A' for further clarification). 4. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one attached sign per lease space shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. A secondary sign may be permitted at a public entrance, provided the entrance is on another side of the building, but shall be limited to twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary or permitted sign size, whichever is more restrictive. The six (6) inch minimum letter/logo height will not apply to these secondary signs. No more than two (2) attached signs shall be allowed per lease space. Attached signs shall be located within the first story of the main exterior entrance for a building or lease space (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). 1OC-14 5. SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent (75%) of the width of any building or lease space. In the event the lease space facade is horizontally articulated, the 75% rule shall apply to the allowed sign to be located on any single plane facade (see Appendix 'B' for further clarification). ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof line of any building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend above the parapet wall. Signs shall be no closer vertically to the eave of the roofline or overhang than the predominant letter height (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). Signs may be attached to a continuous plane fascia, if the sign does not extend above or below the projection of the fascia. Signs attached to fascia are only allowed when attached to structural canopy supported to the ground by columns constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure (See Appendix `B' for further clarification). 7. ILLUMINATION: Attached signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting. Exterior letters with exposed neon lighting are not allowed. 8. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") from the building, excluding signs attached to canopies. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any facade (other than the main front of the building) which faces property zoned for single-family residential uses if the sign is within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the property line of said residential property. SEC. 17 PROHIBITED SIGNS ROOF SIGNS Any sign erected on a vertical framework supported by and located immediately and entirely over the roof of a building is prohibited. Any sign attached to a fascia extending above the projection of the fascia shall be prohibited. Th e painting or otherwise affixing of signs on a roof is prohibited. cm 10C-15 0 That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Portions of Kirkwood Drive and East T.W. King rights -of --way MTP-IBM Addition No. 1, an addition to the City of Southlake, according to the plat recorded -in volume 388/211, Page 68 and 69 of plat records, Tarrant County, Texas and.as:recorded in Cabinet G, Page 208, plat records, Denton County, Texas; being approximtaely 5.1177 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" frorii. "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District and "NR-PUD":Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District to "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2," Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies; training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and verti-port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses as depicted on the approved - Concept Plan, subject to the PUD development standards, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit `B". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promotingthe heal Case No. AgendItem �� safety, morals and the general Attachment G ZA01-017 7A Page 4 WCOMMUNI7Y DEVELOPMENT,MVP-FILES2BA'PENDIVCJ80-313A -R.DOC Page 4