2001-03-20 CC PacketSubmittals Received March 12, 2001
RESUBMITTALS
CASE DESCRIPTION
ZA01-016 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Timarron Golf Course
Location: South of Byron Nelson Parkway, within Timarron.
Current Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development
Applicant: Carter & Burgess, Inc.
Owner: Westerra Timarron, LP
Staff Contact: Ben Bryner
PRE -SUBMITTALS
CASE DESCRIPTION
ZA01-028 AMENDED PLAT
Coventry Manor, Lot 5R, Block 3
Location: On the east side of Suffolk Court, approximately 700' north of Turnberry Lane.
Current Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development
Applicant: Lynn Dixon
Owner: James H. Dowdy Land Surveyor
Staff Contact: Ben Bryner, Ken Baker
ZA01-029 ZONING CHANGE
Briarwood Estates, Lot 7, Block A
Location: On the east side of Cherry Court, approximately 1300' north of S. H. 114.
Current Zoning: "MF-1" Two Family Residential
Request: Amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow triplexes.
Owner/Applicant: Emil A. Halim
Staff Contact: Ken Baker
ZAOi-030 PLAT SHOWING
A. A. Freeman No. 522 Add. Lot 8
Location: On the west side of North Peytonville Avenue, approximateey 800' northeast of
Ten Bar Trail.
Current Zoning: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential
Owner/Applicant: Neal Ingle
Staff Contact: Tara Brooks, Dennis Killough
ZA01-031 PLAT SHOWING
O. W. Knight No. 899 Add. Lot 20
Location: On the east side of Pine Drive, approximately 800' south of South White
Chapel Blvd.
Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural
Applicant: Phil Chaffins Custom Homes
Owner: Bryan Elliott
Staff Contact: Ben Bryner, Dennis Killough
Uj
M
ZA01-032 REZONING/CONCEPT PLAN
Aventerra Southlake Blocks 1-5
Location: On the northeast corner of S. H. 114 and White Chapel Blvd.
Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial, "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned
Unit Development, and "AG" Agricultural
Requested Zoning: "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development
Applicant: Carter Burgess
Owner: Westerra Southlake
Staff Contact: Tara Brooks, Ben Bryner
ZA01-033 PRELIMINARY PLAT
Aventerra Southlake Blocks 1-5
Location: On the northeast corner of S. H. 114 and White Chapel Blvd.
Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial, "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned
Unit Development, and "AG" Agricultural
Applicant: Carter Burgess
Owner: Westerra Southlake
Staff Contact: Tara Brooks, Ben Bryner
ZA01-03.1 FINAL PLAT
Wingate Hill Subdivision
Location: On the east side of North White Chapel Blvd., approximately 700' northwest of
Sweet Court.
Current Zoning: "SP-2" Generalized Site Plan
Applicant: Adams Consulting Engineers
Owner: Wingate Hills, Ltd.
Staff Contact: Ben Bryner
Z A 0 1 - 0 3 5 PLAT SHOWING
J. W. Hale No. 803 Add. Lots 1 & 2
Location: On the west side of Morningside Drive at Vino Blanc Court.
Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential
Owner/Applicant: Felipe Gumucio
Staff Contact: Tara Brooks
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
March 13, 2001
TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xt. 1527)
SUBJECT: Authorize the purchase of library resource materials from Baker and Taylor, as
per cooperative purchasing agreement with the North Texas Regional Library
System (NTRLS)
Action Requested: City Council authorization for the purchase of library resource materials from
Baker and Taylor, as per the cooperative purchasing agreement with North
Texas Regional Library System (NTRLS), for an amount not to exceed
$799,000.
Background
Information: On February 6, 2001 the City Council approved entering into an interlocal
agreement with the North Texas Regional Library System (NTRLS) to
authorize Southlake participation in various NTRLS agreements for the
purchase of library books from Baker and Taylor. The agreement will allow
the City to recognize substantial savings by obtaining the same discounts
from Baker and Taylor that are afforded members of NTRLS.
Baker and Taylor is a well known supplier of library materials and their
collection development specialists have been working with the library staff to
develop the initial orders for the library's opening collection. The materials
will be selected from a variety of different areas including fiction, non-
fiction, reference, classics, biographies, etc., and will be categorized as
juvenile, young adult, and adult. The initial collection is being developed
based on a number of different factors including the demographic data of the
community, results of the 1999 library survey information, and Baker and
Taylor and library staff experience and expertise. The goal is to achieve a
balanced collection meeting the perceived needs of the residents, within the
allotted funding.
Financial
Considerations: Funding in the amount of $1,139,000 is available in the tax increment fund
(TIF) for the library with approximately $790,000 available for the purchase
of resource materials. Funding in the amount of $9,000 is also available in
the library's FY 2000/01 General Fund budget.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: City Council approved a cooperative purchasing agreement with NTRLS for
the purchase of library materials from Baker and Taylor at the February 6,
r
Billy Campbell, City Manager
March 13, 2001
Page 2
2001 meeting, allowing the City to realize substantial savings offered by
Baker and Taylor to NTRLS.
Legal Review: Not Applicable.
Alternatives: Alternatives may include:
■ City Council review and discussion
■ Purchase materials from another vendor
Supporting
Documents: Not Applicable.
Staff
Recommendation: City Council authorization for staff to purchase library resource materials
from Baker and Taylor, as per the cooperative purchasing agreement with
North Texas Regional Library System (NTRLS), for an amount not to exceed
$799,000.
515-Z
M
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
February 20, 2001
To: Billy Campbell, City Manager
From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, ext. 2175
Subject: Award of bid to Sutton & Associates for the construction of East Continental
Blvd. from Crooked Lane to South Kimball and South Kimball to Heritage
Business Park in the amount of $1,418,811.89.
Action Requested: Award the bid to Sutton & Associates for the construction of East
Continental Blvd. from Crooked Lane to South Kimball and South
Kimball to Heritage Business Park in the amount of $1,418,811.89.
Background
Information: The council approved the extension of South Kimball from Continental to
Heritage business park as a part of the FY2000-2001 Capital
Improvements Program. Construction plans and specifications were
subsequently prepared by Cheatham & Associates and reviewed by staff
for this project.
This project is being completed alongside the design and construction of
South Kimball from 1709 to Crooked lane in order to provide access to the
Intermediate/Elementary schools as well as the new Carroll ISD stadium
and bus facility. Due to budget constraints, half of the ultimate roadways
for both projects are being completed this year, with construction of the
second half to be bid and completed in future years.
Bids were received on March 14, 2001. Six bids were received, with
Sutton & Associates being the low bidder. The bids have been reviewed
by Cheatham & Associates and city staff, and are in line with the
engineer's estimate. The bids were tabulated as follows:
Engineer's Estimate
$1,550,000.00
Sutton & Associates
$1,418,811.89
Tri-Dal Utilities, Ltd.
$1,491,082.70
North Texas Contracting
$1,491,924.20
Wright Construction
$1,582,548.37
Texas Sterling Construction
$1,894,591.60
Linder -Stahl Construction
$2,168,940.62
5C - 1
Financial
Consideration: A breakdown of the portion of this project is as follows:
Paving & Drainage $1,220,481.80
Water $172,708.54
Sewer $25,621.55
Total $1,418,811.89
The budget for the paving and drainage portion of this project is $889,887,
which is $330,594.80 less than the low bid price. When funds for this
project were budgeted (prior to design), the extent of the storm sewer
system needed was not anticipated. During the design of the project it was
discovered that extremely flat grades and the need for a 1300 ft. drainage
channel caused an increased amount of drainage improvements.
Consequently, city staff and the consultant reduced the cost of the drainage
portion as much as possible by only providing the minimum amount of
improvements necessary for this portion of the roadway. Staff
recommends funding the overrun from $1.2 Million allocated for Johnson
Road. The council may recall that the Johnson Road project cannot be
built this year due to the amount of time necessary for right-of-way
acquisition. Funds would then be provided in the FY 2001-2002 CIP to
replace those funds that were allocated for South Kimball and Continental.
The Water and Sewer portion will be paid for by funds approved in the FY
2000-2001 CIP for this project, and are within the budgeted amounts.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: None.
Legal Review: None.
Alternatives: The council may award or reject this bid.
Supporting
Documents: Location Map
Project Map
Staff
Recommendation: Please place on the City Council Agenda for March 20, 2001 for council
consideration and approval. Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to
Sutton & Associates in the amount of $1,418,811.89.
5C-2
Staff Contact: Charlie Thomas, P.E., City Engineer, Ext. 2175
Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, Ext. 2308
5C-3
L J
5C-4
E. Continental Blvd. from Crooked Ln. to S. Kimball
& from S. Kimball to Heritage Business Park
S,f ,
_ 14
5C-5
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager
FROM: Sharen Elam, Director of Finance Ext. 1713
SUBJECT: Approval of Audit Report for fiscal year ending September 30, 2000
Action Requested: Approval of September 30, 2000 Financial Audit Report
Background
Information: City Charter requires the City at the close of each fiscal year have an
independent audit performed by a Certified Public Accountant. Weaver and
Tidwell L.L.P., Certified Public Accountants, performed the audit for fiscal
year ending September 30, 2000. Jerry Gaither, Partner, will present the Audit
report on Tuesday night.
Financial
Considerations: None required
Citizen Input/
Board Review: None required
Legal Review: None required
Alternatives: None
Supporting
Documents: None
Staff
Recommendation: Approve September 30, 2000 audit report
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
March 16, 2001
TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager
FROM: John Eaglen, Assistant to the City Manager (481-1433)
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 797, 2"d Reading, Calling a Special Election for the purpose of
Amending the Home Rule Charter
Action Requested: City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 797, 2"d Reading, calling a
Special Election on May 5, 2001 for the purpose of amending the Home Rule
Charter.
Background
Information: Ordinance No. 797 calls a Special Election for the purpose of amending the
Home Rule Charter, and provides that the procedures and election logistics
shall be in accordance with those established for the May 5, 2001 General
Election and meets the criteria specified in the Texas Local Government
Code. The City Council approved Resolution No. 01-003, calling the
General Election and establishing the election procedures and logistics at the
February 6, 2001 meeting.
The following proposed amendments remain unchanged since the City
Council approved the V Reading of Ordinance No. 797 at the March 6, 2001
meeting:
■ Proposition No. 1 — Proposes amendments to Sections 2.02, 5.02, 5.04
("Elective Officers, Judge of the Court, and Absence of Judge"
respectively) in order to be consistent with State Law relating to
establishing the Judge and Alternate Judge(s) of the Municipal Court of
Record.
■ Proposition No. 2 — Proposes amending Section 2.13 ("Nepotism") in
order to be consistent with State Law in respect to nepotism.
■ Proposition No. 3 — Proposes amending Section 4.01 ("Administrative
Departments") in order to clarify that each department head shall
exercise supervisory authority and financial control over their
department.
■ Proposition No. 5 — Proposes amending Section 9.04 ("Submission")
extending the date of submission of the City Manager's proposed budget
and accompanying message to August 151h versus the current required
date of August ls`.
As you recall during consideration of the 1st Reading, Wayne Olson of the
City Attorneys Office mentioned that the City Attorneys were continuing to
7A-(
Billy Campbell, City Manager
March 16, 2001
Page 2
tweak two (2) of the propositions prior to the second reading. The
description of the two (2) items and a summary of the changes is as follows:
■ Proposition No. 4 - Proposes repealing Section 7.11 ("Holding Other
Office") in order to be consistent with State Law regarding succession of
office for elected officials who become a declared candidate for another
office.
Changes since I' Reading - As you recall, the City Attorneys Office had
concern over the use of the word "forfeit" in the Section. In the process
of developing alternative verbiage, the City Attorney determined that the
simplest way to achieve the intent is to repeal Section 7.11 versus
proposing revisions to the existing verbiage. A copy of a letter from
Debra Drayovitch in the City Attorneys Office regarding this
recommendation is attached for your review.
■ Proposition No. 6 - Proposes amending Section 11.04 ("Purpose and
Object of the Planning and Zoning Commission") to clarify the
responsibility of the City Council to review matters relating to the
acquisition of easements and right-of-ways.
Changes since P Reading - The City Attorney recommends revising the
ballot proposition to read "Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be
amended to provide that the City Council has the sole responsibility to
consider and approve the acquisition of easements and right-of-ways,
amending Section 11.04?"
For the Second Reading, the verbiage would need to be in form and content
as it would appear on the May 5, 2001 election ballot.
Financial
Considerations: Holding the Charter Amendment Election on May 5, 2001 saves an estimated
$10,000. Other financial considerations include minimal attorney fees to
review the verbiage of the propositions, and for the development of changes
necessary to be consistent with State Law.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: The Charter Review Committee reviewed a list of potential items at their
February 1, 2001 meeting. Staff incorporated the comments into the
development of the potential ballot propositions.
The City Council reviewed the potential ballot propositions and discussed
potential election dates at their February 20, 2001 meeting. The City
Council elected to eliminate one proposition, leaving six (6) potential ballot
propositions. The City Council also directed staff to bring a resolution and
'7A•2
Billy Campbell, City Manager
March 16, 2001
Page 3
ordinance calling for a May 5, 2001 Charter Amendment Election for their
consideration at the March 6, 2001 meeting.
The City Council approved the 1" Reading of Ordinance No. 797, calling a
Special Election for the purpose of amending the Home Rule Charter on
Consent agenda at the March 6, 2001 meeting (7-0).
Legal Review: The City Attorneys have reviewed the potential propositions and the
ordinance calling for a May 5, 2001 Charter Amendment Election. The City
Attorney will also be present at the meeting to address legal issues regarding
this item.
Alternatives: Input towards the discussion as desired.
Supporting
Documents: Supporting documents include the following items:
■ Copy of Ordinance No. 797, including Exhibit A (Proposed City Charter
Amendments) and Exhibit B (Proposed Ballot Language).
■ Copy of letter received via facsimile on Thursday, March 15, 2001 from
Debra Drayovitch of the City Attorneys office, providing background
information as to the proposed amendment (repealing versus revision) to
Section 7.11, "Holding Other Office."
Staff
Recommendation: Place as an item on the March 20, 2001 City Council agenda to consider
Ordinance No. 797, 2' Reading, calling a special election on May 5, 2001
for the purpose of amending the Home Rule Charter.
1�
JE
`1A 3
NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTIES OF DENTON AND TARRANT
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
TO THE RESIDENT QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS:
Take notice that an election will be held in the City of Southlake the 5 h day of May,
2001, in accordance with an ordinance and resolution adopted by the City Council which is a
part of this notice for all purposes and reads as follows:
ORDINANCE NO.797
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, CALLING A
SPECIAL ELECTION FOR MAY 5, 2001, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
AMENDING THE CITY CHARTER; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, is a home rule city acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to call a special election to submit
proposed amendments to the City Charter to the voters in accordance with Section 9.004 of the
Texas Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, an election to submit to the voters proposed amendments to the city charter
is required by law to be held on a uniform election date; and
WHEREAS, Section 41.001 of the Texas Election Code (the "Code") specifies that the
first Saturday in May shall be a uniform election date.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1.
The City Council does hereby, on its own motion, order a special election to submit to the
voters of Southlake proposed amendments to the City Charter as set forth in Exhibit A, attached
to and incorporated in this ordinance for all purposes. The election shall be conducted according
to the laws of the State of Texas, and shall be held on May 5, 2001, from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
SECTION 2.
The official ballots for said election shall be prepared in accordance with the Texas
Election Code so as to permit the electors to vote "YES" or "NO" on each proposition, with the
qA-5'
ballots to contain such provisions, markings and language as required by law, and with the
propositions to be expressed substantially as set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated in
this ordinance for all purposes.
SECTION 3.
The Mayor and City Secretary of the City, in consultation with the City Attorney, are
hereby authorized and directed to take any and all action necessary to comply with provisions of
the Texas Election Code or other state and federal statutes and constitutions in carrying out the
conduct of the election, whether or not expressly authorized herein.
SECTION 4.
The procedures for the special election for the purpose of amendment to the Home Rule
Charter shall be those contained in Resolution No. 01-003, approved by the City Council on
February 6, 2001, calling a General Election for May 5, 2001, as amended. Notice of the special
election shall be published in the newspaper on the same day in each of two successive weeks,
with the first publication occurring before the 14the day before the date of the election in
accordance with Section 9.004 of the Texas Local Government Code. Additionally, notice shall
(4W be posted no later than April 16, 2001, in the regular place for posting notice of meetings of the
City Council of the City, and shall remain posted continuously through Election Day, May 5,
2001.
SECTION 5.
This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances and resolutions of the
City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with
the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances
and resolutions are hereby repealed.
SECTION 6.
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid
judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not
7A, 4
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph
or section.
SECTION 7.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so
ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF
MARCH, 2001.
7A 1
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF
MARCH, 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED CITY CHARTER AMENDMENTS
w FOR THE MAY 5, 2001 ELECTION
Only the sections or paragraphs being amended are presented below. Sections and
paragraphs not included below remain unchanged. The underlined words are being added to the
Charter, and the words with a line drawn through them are being deleted.
2.02. Elective Officers.
2.13. Nepotism.
"The City adopts the prohibitions against nepotism as contained in the statutes of the State
of Texas ."
4.01. Administrative Departments.
The head of each department shall be a chief, director, or superintendent who shall be
appointed by the City Manager subject to the approval of the Council and such chief,
director or superintendent shall have supervisory authority and
financial control over his department. Two or more departments may be headed by the
same individual and the City Manager may head one or more departments.
5.02. Judge of the Court.
The Citv Council shall by ordinance appoint one or more judges of the Municipal Court.
"judge of tho ManiGiplal Court" shall be elected by the qualifiad ;,oters pursmant to state
scat-te . A -The Judge shall be a resident of this state, be a citizen of the United States, an a
licensed attorney in good standing, licensed to practice in the State of Texas, and must have
two (2) or more vears of experience in practicing law in this state. und- Moot all othe
A 44}e Judge shall serve for a three-(3) two (2) year term. The Council shall
fix the compensation for the Judge, in accordance with State law. and such compensation
shall never be based on the fines assessed or collected. If a vacancy occurs in the office of a
N-M- f M 71
EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 797 PAGE 1
Proposed City Charter Amendments for the May 5, 2001 City of Southlake City Charter Election.
municipal judge of a court of record, the city council shall by ordinance appoint a qualified
person to fill the office for the remainder of the unexpired term.
5.04. .
7.11 Holding Other Office.
9.04. Submission.
The City Manager shall submit to the Council a proposed budget and accompanying
message on or before the €mst fifteenth day of August of each year. The Council shall
review the proposed budget and revise it as deemed appropriate prior to the general
circulation for public hearing.
11.04. Purpose and Object of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The purpose and object of the Planning and Zoning Commission is to act as an advisory
board to the Council in matters designated by ordinance and by state law. Except for
matters relating to city parks which are delegated by the Council to another city board
with responsibilities relating to city parks, and for matters relating to the acquisition of
easement(s) and right-of-ways, the Commission shall advise the Council on matters
relating the zoning, public improvements, civic improvements, city planning, opening,
widening, and changing of streets, routing of public utilities, controlling and regulating
traffic upon the public streets and ways of the City and such other matters relating to City
improvements as the Commission and the Council may deem beneficial to the City.
r1A.0 10
EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 797 PAGE 2
Proposed City Charter Amendments for the May 5, 2001 City of Southlake City Charter Election.
EXHIBIT "B"
PROPOSED CITY CHARTER AMENDMENTS — LIST OF BALLOT
PROPOSITIONS
FOR THE MAY 5, 2001 ELECTION
PROPOSITION NO. 1 - Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to be
consistent with State Law with respect to the appointment, qualifications, and salary for the
municipal court judge, the appointment of alternate judge(s) for the municipal court of
record, and to establish a term of office of two (2) years for the judge and alternate judge(s)
of the municipal court of record, amending Section 5.02, and repealing Sections 2.02, and
5.04?
PROPOSITION NO. 2 - Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to provide
that the State law prohibitions regarding nepotism shall apply, by amending Section 2.13?
PROPOSITION NO. 3 - Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to provide
that each administrative department head shall have supervisory authority and financial
control of the department, amending Section 4.01?
PROPOSITION NO. 4 - Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to conform
with State Law with respect to elected officials serving in office until their successors are
elected, repealing Section 7.11 ?
PROPOSITION NO. 5 - Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to provide
that the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a proposed budget and
accompanying message on or before August fifteenth, amending Section 9.04?
PROPOSITION NO. 6 - Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to provide
that the City Council has the sole responsibility to consider and approve the acquisition of
easements and right-of-ways, amending Section 11.04?
EXHIBIT B TO ORDINANCE NO. 797 Page 1
Proposed City Charter Amendments for the May 5, 2001 City of Southlake City Charter Election.
817 3.32 4741 P. elc: 'Q5
FORT WORTH OF)ICE:
SOLO western Place. 511:tt -'w
r_312 at Aryani_L-in Rnad
Fort Woah. Texas 761�`!-4bi4 r
Voice: (617) 332-DNQ
T4ii nr_e:
Pax. (8171 332.4740
euma: wase@loase.com
Facsimile and Reguiar Mail
John Eaglin
Assistant to City Manager
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street Suite 460
Soc: Te
--',rnEna
s?
Dear John:
PIM 4"1 A l"r1 T'1
Tailor lsoAnslam
Attorneys NV Counselors
AA7rr•� is 7nSl'1
r,%-A.---6-
RM0— Char
Eef r-lecaFVa►-1 LdU- UI1►Cl►L,
✓�: i vszu.
62UN s%�WPsT Hr«m,'
OR1470N.'1'exAs 76.01
mcy; (940) 383•2674
Eta: (940) 898-0118
fNit 152n01
d '
Ynu have advised that the City Council desired to amend Section 7.11 of the City
d'harter }o onnf^rm with Ctnto Law nrovicinnc that pall fnr a council member who files as a
r-
t:C►►U.UQal.- r1_LM •tV.. Got 'Lit lwco +at,. a-201 T47 „-------- is
66-
elected and QualffieG. (r•JGtU Entire is rill Cx::ePttU7t tv !►)►J iss►ts :! L:lC uriar1111 I1M1 UVI
unexpired term of of ice is more than one year.) As Wayne and i discussed il)e purpose
of the proposed amendment, we concluded that the simplest means of acoo mpiishing this
is to repeal this section of the charter. Therefore, if the Council wishes that candidates who
file for election to another nfficp rnntinue to serve until their successors are qualified.
ce. +- 7 1 1 a k^ �Irt he rencolcr� AGonrAinniV l hnva mn({ifiRrf thin Lannl anP in I_XhihitS
.jcL-LiUrr r . r r orrvGw vv IV1J4Uwv• ..J.Jr -�
unu to J•_ r•- aL r .s:.... lam......'.... r ht a 01-1c.10'e 1 1IF you h "A" and 0 of the ol-kia ce calli► g th CIC1,LIUI1. WU)JIc.7 of cSC,+ are asrr�,rwvs+_ ,. yLi.. �18
any CLuesbons in this regard, or desire further changes, pieU-se dv 11UL flesi`catc lu Leait.
DAU:roar
enc.
rr.- Wnvnp K nlcnn
w_iSouthiake\LETTERS\EaglinDADOO t .wpd
Very truly yours,
L)t/&44v 1(� ' W j,j I
it V ►v' =
Debra A. Drayov zCi r
AIL
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager
FROM: Bruce Payne, Director of Planning, Ext. 2036
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 798, 2nat Reading, An ordinance approving the general service
rates including rate adjustment provisions and miscellaneous service charges to
be charged for sales and transportation of natural gas to residential, commercial
and industrial consumers in the City of Southlake, Denton and Tarrant Counties,
Texas.
Action Requested: Approval of Ordinance No. 798
Background
Information: TXU Gas Distribution filed a Statement of Intent to change the rates for local
gas distribution service in the Northwest Metro/Mid Cities Distribution
System, which includes Southlake. TXU is proposing a 1.36% rate increase
for the City of Southlake. If the City agrees (1) to accept TXU Gas
Distribution's proposed rate changes, as filed, and pass ordinance 798
approving the proposed rates, and (2) to forego any right to participate in an
appeal to the Railroad Commission of Texas should TXU file one, TXU agrees
to the following:
1. If any other city in the Northwest Metro/Mid Cities Distribution
System negotiates a settlement with TXU Gas Distribution that results
in rates that are less than the proposed rates as filed by TXU with that
city, TXU will offer those same settlement terms to Southlake;
2. The new rates will not be implemented until after June 21, 2001;
3. Customers in Southlake will not be surcharged for any rate case
expenses associated with this Statement of Intent or any appeal to the
Railroad Commission of Texas, should one be filed.
Approval of ordinance 798 will constitute the City's acceptance of TXU's
offer. (Letter from TXU attached to Ordinance 798)
Financial
Considerations: None required
Citizen Input/
Board Review: Public hearing is scheduled for March 20, 2001
Legal Review: City Attorney reviewed the attached ordinance.
116-1
Billy Campbell, City Manager
March 16, 2001
Page 2
Alternatives: Approve or deny ordinance 798.
Supporting
Documents: Ordinance No. 798
TXU letter
Staff
Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 798
MAR-02-2001 FRI 11:53 AN TXU ELECT AND GAS FAX N0, 19406274144 F. 04
ORDINANCE NO. ] - I
—l_
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE GENERAL SERVICE RATES
INCLUDING RATE ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS AND
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES TO BE CHARGED FOR
SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS TO
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL CONSUMERS IN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, DENTON AND TARRANT COUNTIES,
TEXAS, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR, AND
PROVIDING FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH SUCH RATES MAY BE
CHANGED, ADJUSTED, AND AMENDED.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. On February 16, 2001, TXU Gas Distribution, a division of TXU Gas
Company ("Company") filed with the Governing Body of this municipality a Statement of
Intent to Change Residential, Commercial and Industrial Rates charged to consumers
within this municipality. Also filed was the Tariff for Gas Service in the Northwest
Metro/Mid Cities Distribution System ("Tariff for Gas Service") and the supporting Cost
of Service Schedules ("Schedules"). The Tariff for Gas Service includes Rate
Schedules 4100 - NW Metro/Mid Cities System Cities, 4101 - Presidential Service, 4102
- Commercial Service, 4103 - Industrial Sales, 4104 - Industrial Transportation, 4108-1
through 4108-3 - Rate Adjustment Provisions, 9001 through 9007 - Miscellaneous
Service Charges and Rider 4106 - Surcharges.
SECTION 2. The maximum general service rates for sales and transportation of
natural gas rendered to residential, commercial and industrial consumers within the city
limits of Southlake, Texas by TXU Gas Distribution, a division of TXU Gas Company, a
Texas corporation, its successors and assigns, are hereby fixed and approved
forth in Rate Schedules 4101 - Residential Service, 4102 - Commercial Service, 4103 -
Industrial Sales, and 4104 - Industrial Transportation included in the Tariff for Gas
Service in the Northwest Metro/Mid Cities Distribution System filed on February 16,
2001,
SECTION 3. The Rate Adjustment Provisions set forth in the Tariff for Gas
Service as Rate Schedules 4108-1 Gas Cost Adjustment, 4108-2 Tax Adjustment, and
4108-3 Weather Normalization Adjustment are approved.
SECTION 4. The Company shall have the right to collect such reasonable
charges as are necessary to conduct its business and to carry out its reasonable rules
and regulations. Such miscellaneous service charges are identified in Rate Schedules
9001 through 9007 of the Tariff for Gas Service and are approved. Services for which
no charge is set out may be performed and charged for by the Company at a level
established by the normal forces of competition.
SECTION 5. The aforesaid rate schedules herein approved shall be effective
from and after the effective date set forth in the Statement of Intent, if this ordinance is
passed and approved on or before that effective date.
SECTION 6. The rates set forth in this ordinance may be changed and amended
by either the City or Company in the manner provided by law. Service hereunder is
subject to the orders of regulatory bodies having jurisdiction, and to the Company's
Rules and Regulations currently on file with the City.
Page 1 of 2
9 Q-3
MAR-U?-LUU I H 1 11: bU AM I XU ELEUl' AND UA5 h AX NU. 1 y4Ub� t4144 ; ' U5
SECTION 7. Unless otherwise noted herein, other than TXU Gas Distribution (a
named party), no person or entity has been admitted as a party to this rate proceeding.
SECTION 8. It is hereby found and determined that said meeting at which this
ordinance was passed was open to the public, as required by Texas law, and that
advance public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the First Reading on this the _
IA.D.,2001.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the Second Reading on this the
A. D., 2001
ATTEST:
City Secretary
(Seal)
14
Page 2 of 2
r g _4
day of
Mayor
City of Southlake, Texas
day of
MAR-02-2001 FRI 11:52 AM TXU ELECT AND GAS
FAX NO.
19406274144
TXU
P, 02
�Electric & Gas Stephen J. Houle
W, Bryan St, 32nd Floor vice President
Deltas, TX 75201
Tel: 214 612 4921
Fax 21 A 612 3221
S110u1e1 @txu.com
k�.
February 28, 2001
Honorable Rick Stacy
Mayor, City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 270
Southlake, Texas 76092
Dear Honorable Stacy:
As you arc aware, TXU Gas Distribution recently filed a Statement of Intent to
chance the rates for local gas distribution service in the Northwest Metro/Mid
Cities Distribution System, which includes your city. This letter confirms that if
your city agrees (1) to accept TXU Gas Distribution's proposed rate changes, as
filed, and pass an ordinance approving the proposed rates, and (2) to forego any
right to participate in an appeal to the Railroad Commission of Texas should the
Company file one, the Company will agree as follows:
1. If any other city in the Northwest Metro/Mid Cities
Distribution System negotiates a settlement with TXU Gas
Distribution that results in rates that are less than the proposed
rates as filed by the Company with that city, the Company will
offer those same settlement terms (reflected as a percentage
reduction of the rates as proposed) to your city, such that no
other city in the Northwest Metro/Mid Cities Distribution
System will receive more favorable rate treatment than that
offered to your city. For example, if City A negotiates a
settlement that results in its rates being 10% less than those
proposed by the Company, your city will be offered a 10%
reduction in the rates as proposed by the Company and
approved in your ordinance;
2. The new rates will not be implemented until after June 21,
2001;
3. Customers in your city will not be surcharged for any rate case
expenses associated with this Statement of Intent or any appeal
to the Railroad Commission of Texas, should one be filed.
rj P-.)-S
MAR-02-2001 FRI 11:53 AM TXU ELECT AND GAS FAX NO. 19406274144 P. 03
Passage of an ordinance approving the new rates as filed will constitute your
city's acceptance of this offer. Of course, if your city accepts this offer, and the
Company does not reach a mutually agreeable settlement with any other city in
the Northwest Metro/Mid Cities Distribution System that results in rates that are
less than the proposed rates as filed, rates in your city will be set as proposed in
the Statement of Intent and passed in the ordinance, and will not be adjusted to
comport,%ith the results of any appeal.
We appreciate your consideration of the Company's proposal. Please feel free to
call me if you have any Questions.
Sincerely,
/gd
I P-,- L
e
Im
0-
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
March 16, 2001
CASE NO: ZA00-127
PROJECT: Big Bowl Restaurant
REQUEST: On behalf of Wyndham Properties, Brinker International is requesting approval of a Site Plan
for Big Bowl Restaurant.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing.
2. Consider Site Plan.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plans and Support Information
(D)
Site Plan Review Summary
(E)
Developer Comments
(F)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(G)
Neighboring Property Owner Letters
(H)
Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Case No.
ZA00-127
Agenda Item
7C
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Q., OWNER: Wyndham Properties
APPLICANT: Brinker International
PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located in Gateway Plaza, Phase II, on the northeast corner
of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and North Nolen Drive.
HISTORY: The Zoning and Concept Plan for Gateway Plaza, Phase II was approved on
June 6, 2000. A Site Plan for Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway Plaza, Phase II was
approved September 19, 2000.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Tracts 3 and 7, W. E. Mayfield Subdivision
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial
District uses, including a gasoline service station and tires, batteries, and
automobile accessories.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Thoroughfare Plan
The property is located at the northeast corner of Nolen Drive and F.M. 1709.
The Thoroughfare Plan recommends that Nolen be constructed as 5-lane
undivided arterial with 84' of right-of-way at this location. The approval of
the Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat allowed a 5 lane undivided arterial
street within a 70' right-of-way with a 10' utility easements to be provided
on both sides of the right-of-way. Nolen Drive will have direct access onto
the east bound State Highway 114 service road and F.M. 1709. S.H. 114 and
F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) are both variable width State rights -of -
way. S.H. 114 is approximately 400' in width and F.M. 1709 is
approximately 130' in width adjacent to this site.
Existiniz Area Road Network
State Highway 114 - is currently an east -west four (4)-lane divided roadway
that runs to the north of the development. Current Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) plans are to improve State Highway 114 from its
current configuration to a six (6) lane freeway with full frontage roads in the
next 18 months. The traffic counts for State Highway 114 are illustrated in
Table #l.
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A
ZA00-127 7C Page 1
Case No.
ZA00-127
Table #1
The current traffic counts on State Hi hway 114:
24hr
West Bound (WB) (30,062
East Bound EB (29,397
WB
Peak A.M. 1,729 8a.m-9 a.m.
Peak P.M. (3,011) 5 .m.-6 .m.
EB
Peak A.M. 2,651 7a.m-8a.m
Peak P.M. (1,956) 5 .m.-6 .m
FM 1709 - is an east -west 5-lane undivided roadway with paved shoulders
located south of the site. The intersection of F.M. 1709 and Kimball Avenue
is signalized, as is the intersection of FM 1709 and Gateway Plaza. Current
plans of TxDOT are to re -stripe F.M. 1709 as a 7-lane undivided roadway.
The current traffic counts for Southlake Boulevard are illustrated in Table #2.
Tnhle. #2
The current traffic counts on Southlake
Boulevard:
24hr I
West Bound (WB) (22,288
East Bound EB (21,042
WB
Peak A.M. (1,313) 11 a.m-
Noon
Peak P.M. (2,280) 5 p.m.-6 p.m
EB
Peak A.M. 1,930 7a.m-8a.m.
Peak P.M. 1,315 5 .m.-6 .m.
Nolen Drive -is under construction at this time. Construction is expected to
be completed Summer 2001.
Traffic Impact
According the Institute of Traffic Engineer Trip Generation Manual, the
proposed development is projected to generate approximately 782 vehicle
trips per day. However, the average pass -by trip percentage for a sit-down
restaurant is 43%. Therefore, the site is expected to generate approximately
446 new vehicle trips per day. According to a Traffic Impact Analysis
conducted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, the future intersection of Nolen
Drive and F.M. 1709 is projected to operate at a L.O.S. "F" at the peak P.M.
hour once build -out of Gateway Plaza has occurred if a traffic signal is not
in place. The Kimley-Horn and Associates traffic impact study recommended
that the future intersection of F.M. 1709 and Nolen Drive be studied for
future signalization as the tracts of land between 1709 and State Highway
114 develop to improve the level of service. The traffic impact of the site is
projected below (See Table #3):
Agenda Item Attachment A
7C Page 2
WATER AND SEWER:
ESTIMATED IMPACT
FEES*:
Table #3
Use
Sq. Ft.
Vtpd*
AM-
AM-
PM-
PM -
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
High Turnover Sit
6,000
782
18
9
39
28
Down Restaurant
*Vehicle Trips per Day
AM and PM represent counts during the peak traffic period on F.M. 1709.
Source: ITE Trip Generation -6th Edition
Water and sewer services will be connected to 12" water and 8" sewer lines
being installed with the Gateway Phase 2 construction.
The estimated impact fees are shown below (See Table #4)
Tnhle 44
Water
$5947.65
assumes 1 - simple 2" meter
Wastewater
$3706.37
assumes 1 — simple 2" meter
Roadway
$5684
SA 2, approx. 6,000 s
* Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of
Building Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estimates prepared by the
Planning Department.
P&Z ACTION: February 22, 2001; Approved (5-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No.
3, dated February 16, 2001, and to approve the articulation variance (Item
# 1) as proposed.
P&Z SPEAKERS: None.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 16, 2001.
The pad site and parking area for this property was approved with the original
site plan for Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway plaza Phase II. At that time the tennant
and specific building design needs was not known. The purpose of this plan
is to review the proposed building design.
NACommunity Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-127SP.doc
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A
ZA00-127 7C Page 3
0
0
NORTHWEST PKWy EAST
Case No.
ZA00-127
Vicinity Map
Big Bowl Restaurant
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
W )r-E
S
Agenda Item
7C
Attachment B
Page 1
LI U U Li
�--1 a� U I.I J i '•I I �.s LI LI !l 11 11 W.I :.I II LI
ANVdWOJ Alvadodd N'1oJN19
; e lU 1Ni WJU IjAjUV I F al I Ij 3"p. �� 7 r° k 9 O rr 8
`,� a�.2 a V60 OOVZ ON 3SV� } I i
IZ 3SVHd
Zd Ali 3
JIJOI9'11
^
1O;?
r. $iae'sa:�_�� 6�-aka•%7 g`�° it��If3Yy
❑ ❑ O ❑ G ❑ ❑ t ❑ O ❑ t ❑ 1❑ O ❑NV❑d ❑ S I —I 'j❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c ❑
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
1t1i=6:I
r i f f
it
2 I 1i 3
e :
IN
N iii
I-�
-
li'1�a1
13J.
-a•a�
I
!
ilfi
J 1
Ialal=4=i;
�ta
� ,Yt; r�
I
t
t
I
r
I
$
Ij� ISI
.rI.9•
:
I
Iat 41
3�331i1
*Ri
I
.li
j;3
ti
77i1i
Hit
.I
a.3 '''
jlf I
a�
as r a
3 1 i(
IsslliS
p a 1 a
!
f�3
1 s lt�HotISS
El
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C
ZA00-127 X Page 1
,n
Case No.
ZA00-127
0
LS ee y�
V
;■
i k
A
oNN
W VC
fey
€ls>�
�
qq
1
qgE
1
1
I
3�
1
1
II
1
I
II
�
\1
1
ti
n 38
1
1
1
1
_
y
1
I
,
,
'
e
1
ail 12l0 N370
°717- NA'� a Item
X
W
Attachment C
Page 2
r
C=)
di
LO
LL.
11
z
0
d 5
0
z
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C
ZA00-127 7C Page 3
OR
Case No.
ZAOO-127
+ + 12
Agenda Item
7C
Attachment C
Page 4
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA00-127 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 02/16/01
Project Name: Site Plan — Big Bowl Restaurant, Gateway Plaza II
APPLICANT:
Brinker International
Doug Cobb
Phone : (972) 770-9155
Fax: : (972) 770-9467
ENGINEER:
R.L. Goodson Jr. Engineers
Stuart Marcusson
Phone : (214) 739-8100
Fax : (214) 739-6354 _
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT ELEVATIONS RECEIVED 02/05/01 AND SITE
PLAN RECEIVED 2/12/01 AND 2/14/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS
ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS
KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073.
The primary purpose of this site plan is to evaluate the design of the building facades that were not
available during the site plan approval for Gateway Plaza Phase H.
1. Provide building fagade articulation in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section
43.9cId. See attached articulation chart for areas of deficiency. (Variance Requested)
2. Some landscape islands do not meet minimum width requirements. Landscape parking island area
must be provided at a ratio of 20 s.f. per parking stall in each row of parking. It appears that this
requirement can be met by redistributing and/or combining the current areas provided.
Informational Comments
An 8' trail is required along Southlake Boulevard. The Community Service Department has
recommended that funds be escrowed for its construction rather than being constructed with this
project. Contact Chris Carpenter with the parks department at (817) 481-1585.
* It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and
will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use
Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
A final tree survey and landscape plan meeting the requirements of respective ordinances and the
City Landscape Administrator must be provided to the building department prior to issuance of a
building permit.
NXOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-127SP3.DOC
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D
ZA 00-127 5 Page I
Articulation Evaluation No.3 -r —
Case No. ZA 00.127
]Date of Evaluation:
01116101
.Elevations for;Big
Bowl
_
;Received: 02105101
Front facin
South (Wall ht.
Horizontal articulation--
23
�-
Vertical articulation
Required
_
Provided] D
101
--�----
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
_ -
yk
Max. wall length
---�
_ 69 -�-48
_
-30%
-- Yes
- 69
_
— -34 -51%i
-; -
Yes
�Min. artic. offset
! 3 9
--7---'---.-._..---'-----'-
121 32I
200%
--�---------'--
Yes
Yes
3
9
3, 0%;
--'
91 0%
Yes
'Min. artic. length
! �-
--167%
-
-_ - -�-
Rear - facing
{North - Wall hl t. -
21
-
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required Provided
Delta
Okay?
Provided Delta,
Okay?
'Max. wall length
i 63
; 72
14%
No
--Required
63
301
-52%
Yesi
;Min. artic. offset
i 3 0
0
100X
Na 3
No 8,
2' 33%No
14i 75%j
Yes
Min. artic. length
16
•100%
Right - facing:
East Wall ht.
21------------
i
Horizontal articulation
j !Vertical articulation
Max. length
Required Provided
63 40
Delta
•37%
Okay? Required --Provided-
Yes 63
Delta
271 -57%
Okay?
wall _
FMin. artic. offset — 3t- 3
_
Min. artic. length { -- 101 35
0%
250%
_Yes'
Yes 3 , - -_ _3�-- 0%1 Yes
_4 ---i
Yes8,i 7 8, 14%'i Yesi
Left - facing:
'West Wall ht. -
i
21
'
Horizontal articulation
Required Provided'
Delta'
Vertical articulation --�--
Okay? Required
L-
Provided Delta
_
Okay
'Max. wall length
'Min. artic. offset
63 65
3 9
3%
200%
No 63
Yes 3 ;
30 -52%
2, .33%;
Yes
Nol
__ --
_
21 !
Yes''
in. artic. length
�- 16 21
_-_31
%
Yes _ 8 ; _ _
-163% -
-
- _
Case No.
ZA00-127
Agenda Item
7C
Attachment D
Page 2
a
* (W
B_RINKER
IV=sN;iluVAL•
6820 LBJ Frwy.
Dallas, TX 75240
972.770.9155
January 22, 2001
Dennis Killoush
City of Southlake
Suite 310
1400 Nlain Street
Southlake, Texas 76092
RE: Big Bowl Restaurant
Gateway Plaza Phase II
City Case # ZA-00-127
Dear Dennis:
Per our phone conversation yesterday, I am writing to further explain our DRC application. I also wanted to
make clear to you that we are leasing a building pad and that all site work will be completed by the developer,
i.e. parking, site utilities, grading and drainage, parkin„ lighting and perimeter landscaping. It may appear that
we have not addressed some of your comments and I wanted to take a minute to explain our positions on these
issues.
Articulation: While our elevations may not meet the letter of the law, I do believe they meet the spirit.
(W We have shown on our elevations a footprint of the wall in question below the particular elevation and a note
above the wall showing any type of articulation that occurs above the bottom of the wall. We have also made
an attempt to change exterior materials on larger sections of wall to create the look of an articulation where
one may not exist. The reasoning behind these efforts is to prevent us from having to build additional space
that is not needed in our restaurant. Our floor plan is very efficient and every square foot of space is used. In
order to meet some of the articulation requirement we would have to add square footage that would be of no
use to us, essentially adding cost to the project with no benefit.
Pitched Roof: The revised Site Plan should indicate the under roof square footage as 6,169 feet.
Landscaping: The only landscaping that we will be completing is the landscaping that occurs on the
building pad. All perimeter landscaping has already been approved as part of the overall development plan.
Tree Preservation: All tree preservation issues have been addressed as part of the overall development plan.
Fire Hvdrants: The fire hydrants should be addressed in the overall development plan.
I look forward to discussing this project with you and your staff on Thursday. In the meantime, if you need
anv additional information, please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
Brink International
/ I l
/Douglas J. Itobb
Property Development Manager
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA00-127 7C Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Big Bowl Restaurant
774
W-W
Property Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage
1. G. Harrell 1. S-P-2 1. Mixed Use 1. 2.94
2. D. Perry 2. S-P-2 2. Mixed Use 2. 2.62
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA00-127 7C Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Big Bowl Restaurant
NOTICES SENT: Two (2)
RESPONSES: None
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G
ZA00-127 7C Page 1
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
March 16, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-005
PROJECT: Sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption
REQUEST: Brinker International (Big Bowl Restaurant) is requesting approval of a Specific Use
Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption per Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (1) and Section 45.6.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct Public Hearing.
2. Consider Specific Use Permit.
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Exhibit
(D) Surrounding Property Owner Map
(E) Surrounding Property Owner Responses
(F) Resolution No. 01-013
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Case No. Agenda Item
ZA01-005 7D
OWNER:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Wyndham Properties
APPLICANT: Brinker International (Big Bowl Restaurant)
PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located in Gateway Plaza, Phase II, on the northeast corner
of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and North Nolen Drive.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Tracts 3 and 7, W. E. Mayfield Subdivision.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial
District uses, including a gasoline service station and tires, batteries, and
automobile accessories.
P&Z ACTION: February 22, 2001; Approved (6-0).
P&Z SPEAKERS: None.
STAFF COMMENTS: A site exhibit is included as attachment `C' of this packet.
Case No. Agenda Item
ZA01-005 7D
Attachment A
Page 1
NORTHWESTEST KWyP EAST
Case No.
ZA01-005
Vicinity Map
Big Bowl Restaurant
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
W E
S
Agenda Item
7D
Attachment B
Page 1
•
■
Li _i i :1 L: '1 C; J U LI LI Ll t I G I 1 1
ANVdW00A113A08aN'IOW'i
Z .,n jo tvarE�atanEu r
I; Y6O-OOVZ �ON HSYJ g pf at��lie,-,
SVX31'aXYIH1aOS1:1`:
%r Z 3SVHd VZV1d AVM31vO
w2
.Z MDO10 •1 101 P
'1 101 1103 Nv1d 3115
Via_
ayai.a-.71y j
E ji
all
i%i-•-i
Ef /
ITn"
nr— 0 R
��i�i�J~�' -- iallllll:IlEglllil►d � i ,1 `�
_ j U1,
_
� ��!-,111!1'ii `•� � � • � a�litiiCf:ri .!� �I (//a•..JA
Nil
!�E I�I � I !! • 111W1111ll1llll11llllUWlUlllllllllli_,;�—�--- w�„"'Y___ fir ;lE,t /
Case No. Agenda Item
ZA01-005 7D
■
~ LLJ
yo :4
Attachment C
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
Case No.
ZAOI-005
U
G'—s'xcw
-7 /yc N370N da Item
7D
W
Attachment
Page
Surrounding Property Owners
Big Bowl Restaurant
Property Owner Zoninp. Land Use Description Acreage
1. G. Harrell 1. S-P-2 1. Mixed Use 1. 2.94
2. D. Perry 2. S-P-2 2. Mixed Use 2. 2.62
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D
ZA01-005 7D Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic
beverages for on -premise consumption
NOTICES SENT: Two (2)
RESPONSES: None
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZAOI-005 7D Page I
Resolution No.00-013
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO.01-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS,
GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
FOR ON -PREMISE CONSUMPTION ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF TRACTS 3
AND 7, W. E. MAYFIELD SUBDIVISION, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise
consumption has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the
property zoned as "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District
uses including a gasoline service station and tires, batteries, and automobile accessories; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1 (1) and 45.6 of the City's
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have
given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested
and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such
Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare
of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise
consumption on the property being legally described as portions of Tracts 3 and 7, W.E. Mayfield
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA00-103 7D Page 1
N
Resolution No.00-013
Page 2
Subdivision, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", and as depicted on the approved
development plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective
date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions
set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be
applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SECTION 2.
This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS
ATTEST:
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
City of Southlake, Texas
Case No.
ZA00-103
DAY OF , 2001.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
By:
Rick Stacy, Mayor
Agenda Item
7D
Attachment F
Page 2
Resolution No.00-013
Page 3
EXHIBIT "A"
Portions of Tracts 3 and 7, W. E. Mayfield Subdivision, an addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in volume 388-C, page 4, plat records, Tarrant
County, Texas.
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA00-103 7D Page 3
w
0
V
Resolution No.00-0 13
Page 4
Case No.
ZAOO-103
a
III
EXHIBIT "B"
A4Ww"oo laxydow M-76zifirl
M11"D 7-
SV7= I.M"AIMmos Ili
z -a -,! SVH.1 VZ"ld.LVAUVD r I!,: J!pj jj;l I
1930,11,11(n V
� I P I X:)018 1101 10.4 RIVId 311S
C 0 C 0 7"No 0 C Li 0 0 0 C3 a
IS
A 1
i, 1 lezz:..
act...
q� j . . . . . .
ORO 1.111 :1 ,1,14 )OR
OR
Agenda Item
7D
Attachment F
Page 4
Resolution No.00-013
Page 6
EXHIBIT "B"
Y1410 N370N FILNON
,erLgS M .L1,6�9t 5
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA00-103 7D Page 5
Resolution No.00-013
Page l
EXHIBIT "C"
This page reserved for the approved City Council motion.
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA00-103 7D Page
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
March 16, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-007
PROJECT: Sabre Corporate Campus
REQUEST: On behalf of Sabre Group, TSG Trust 1999-1 is requesting approval of a Rezoning
and Revised Concept Plan.
ACTION NEEDED: Consider rezoning and revised concept plan request.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plans and Support Information
(D)
Concept Plan Review Summary
(E)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(F)
Surrounding Property Owner Letters
(G)
Ordinance No. 480-313A
(H)
Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Case No.
ZA01-007
Agenda Item
7E
Pq
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: TSG Trust 1999-1
APPLICANT: Sabre Group
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of State
Highway 114 and Kirkwood Drive.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: An approximately 5.1 acre portion of an approximately 156 acre tract
described as Lot 4, Block A, MTP-IBM Addition No. 1; Tracts 1, 1Al, 1C,
2A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A4, 2A5, 2A7, and portions of Tracts 2A and 2A6 situated
in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015; portions of Tracts 1 and 1 C
situated in the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134; portions of Tracts
3A1, 3AIA, 3A1A2, 3A3A1, 413, 4131, 4B2, situated in the Rees D. Price
Survey, Abstract No. 1207; and portions of Kirkwood Drive and East T.W.
King rights -of -way.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use, Medium Density Residential, 100-Year Flood Plain
CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District and "NR-PUD"
Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2," Office
District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are
generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies;
training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and verti-
port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses.
REQUESTED ZONING: "NR-PUD Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2,"
Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are
generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies;
training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and verti-
port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses.
P&Z ACTION: March 8, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary
No. 1, dated March 2, 2001.
P&Z SPEAKERS: None
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated March 2, 2001.
The purpose of this request is to include the Kirkwood Boulevard and E.
T.W. King rights -of -way into the zoning and concept plan boundary of the
Sabre Project. At the time of the original zoning and concept plan approval
an abandonment ordinance for the subject rights -of -way had not been
approved. On April 18, 2000, the City Council approved the abandonment
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A
ZAOI-007 7E Page 1
ordinances. The applicant is now requesting that they be included in the
boundary of the project. Approval of this request will change the permitted
uses and development regulations within the rights -of -way to match those
within the Sabre project. This site is subject to all previous conditions of
approval for the Sabre Project Zoning and Concept Plan (Case ZA99-056 and
Ordinance 480-313).
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A
ZA01-007 7E Page 2
Case No.
ZA01-007
Vicinity Map
Sabre
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
W FE
S
Agenda Item
7E
Attachment B
Page 1
C T-
9
ig $ � tl
9
V.g
iL�i
n a A
Z � d i
At s
G o O�
a�$d
as d
€
ct
a
zz
Z ��8C}74i!
C
'fab"
WN =
V .1 �Z O�
LAJ
�o.ua
5
m 0
¢ o,
0.0
OC Z y�G�
F
O
Z
OSa<c" aaAi
oCFN3�ai
V W;1 °
o
W m Z e
m <
z 6g�}i
<
Zia
------- •—,------
---------aaax.-•-----•-----•----------------
--- --- -
�:�--sue � -----
----- —
------------1
�I
s.
,O �� ��.' ;, VSt� _ j /, ��� �g �\ � � �e. RJ •"`kD' Y ic�u
'41 k,
a Allms
} ' � .� ..- ,� � Lam'- ��((r'�_ - �t\ : ` \i • ;� .� '
it
I
it
{!:/ i4 •�it
' I i1i1 -fig ' \`\. � ��,la 1 1 ' ;
An
it
it
it
it
it RiA,
'
a Agend` ` tem A � $� c6e t C
-0 7E8a�o ,� Page 1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA01-007 Review No.: One Date of Review: 03/02/01
Project Name: Revised Concept Plan & Zoning — Sabre Corporate Campus
APPLICANT:
Sabre Group
4255 Amon Carter
Fort Worth, TX 76115
Phone: (817) 963-1118
Fax: (817) 967-4914
ENGINEER:
Brockette, Davis, and Drake, Inc.
4144 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1100
Dallas, TX 75204
Phone: (214) 824-3647
Fax: (214)824-7064
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 03/02/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073.
Transfer all information from original concept plan as previously approved.
Informational Comments:
* The purpose of this request is to include the Kirkwood Boulevard and E. T.W. King rights -of -way into
the zoning and concept plan boundary of the Sabre Project. At the time of the original zoning and
concept plan approval an abandonment ordinance for the subject rights -of -way had not been approved.
On April 18, 2000, the City Council approved the abandonment ordinances. The applicant is now
requesting that they be included in the boundary of the project. Approval of this request will change
the permitted uses and development regulations within the rights -of -way to match those within the
Sabre project. This site is subject to all previous conditions of approval for the Sabre Project Zoning
and Concept Plan (Case ZA99-056 and Ordinance 480-313).
Denotes Informational Comment
N:\Community Deve1opment\WP-FILES\REV\200I \01-007CP Ldoc
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D
ZA 01-007 7E Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Sabre Corporate Campus, Phase II
Property Owner
Zoninp-
Land Use Description
Acrea e
1. A. Oien
1. AG
1. Low Density Residential
1.
3.61
2. IBM
2. NR-PUD
2. Mixed Use
2.
0.40
3. TXU
3. NR-PUD
3. Mixed Use
3.
2.15
4. Brazos Electric
4. NR-PUD
4. Mixed Use
4.
3.92
5. A. Oien
5. AG
5. Low Density Residential
5.
3.15
6. IBM
6. NR-PUD
6. Medium Density Residential
6.
4.08
7. IBM
7. NR-PUD
7. Medium Density Residential
7.
69.05
8. IBM
8. NR-PUD
8. Mixed Use
8.
48.54
9. MTP-IBM
9. NR-PUD
9. Mixed Use
9.
20.15
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-007 7E Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Sabre Corporate Campus, Phase II
NOTICES SENT: Six
RESPONSES: None
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA01-007 7E Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.480-313A
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480, AS AMENDED, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN
TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS, PORTIONS OF KIRKWOOD
DRIVE AND EAST T.W. KING RIGHTS -OF -WAY MTP-IBM ADDITION
NO. 1, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 388/211, PAGE 68 AND 69 OF PLAT
RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND AS RECORDED IN
CABINET G, PAGE 208, PLAT RECORDS, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS;
BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.1177 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "R-PUD"
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND "NR-
PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
TO "NR-PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT WITH "0-2," OFFICE DISTRICT USES AND CERTAIN OTHER
PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES WHICH ARE GENERALLY
RELATED TO COMMUNICATION, COMPUTER, AND INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGIES; TRAINING AND CONFERENCE CENTERS; PARKING
STRUCTURES; HELIPORT/STOP AND VERTI-PORT/STOP; HOTEL,
RESTAURANT, RETAIL AND OFFICE USES AS DEPICTED ON THE
APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN, SUBJECT TO THE PUD DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS, ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS
AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE
SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING
FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
NACOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-313-A.DOC
Page I
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned "R-PUD" Residential
Planned Unit Development District and "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development
District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
N:ICOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBATENDING\480.313-A.DOC
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,
are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN DWP-FILES\ZBA\PENDINGA80-313-A.DOC
Page 3
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Portions of Kirkwood Drive and East T.W. King rights -of -way MTP-IBM Addition No.
1, an addition to the City of Southlake, according to the plat recorded in volume 388/211,
Page 68 and 69 of plat records, Tarrant County, Texas and as recorded in Cabinet G,
Page 208, plat records, Denton County, Texas; being approximtaely 5.1177 acres, and
more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "R-PUD" Residential
Planned Unit Development District and "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit
Development District to "NR-PUD" Non -Residential Planned Unit Development
District with "0-2," Office District uses and certain other permitted and accessory
uses which are generally related to communication, computer, and information
technologies; training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and
verti-port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses as depicted on the approved
Concept Plan, subject to the PUD development standards, attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit `B".
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance
WCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN7IWP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-313-A.DOC
Page 4
with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general
welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and
the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the
streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the
community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration
among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses
and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
WCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-313-A.DOC
Page 5
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued
violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under
such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 92001.
NACOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-3I3-A.DOC
Page 6
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of 92001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
NACOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\460-313-A.DOC
Page 7
KM
IN
EXHIBIT "A"
r R.O.W.
,0S"IrWE MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1
'" VOL 388-211, PG. 68
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS
a 1ux'22-
Q. R- .0i00'
l- J.7.06'
G1. R05WW'. - J.1.22' 1•.I00'
J
`•S W MEOLIN SURVEY A/1588 I DENTON CO.
W. ME-'4.N SUR'.EY a/195a 7AP,RANT CO.
7n
�L0C1 A
F.
. rs.
�� ••/`� �.y _ _ W. MERLIN SURVEY A/195a
U.P. MARiiN SURVEY Al;
MTP-IBM ITI cs
Vol. 388.21 , 8
577;�;,
c � acl-es
I
I
BLOCK B
CI]
LOT 4
(1 N C12
V Z! Z
01� c2 LOT 2
,,� 3II
�z ' K yt ✓ tA' L1 N
<<a SABRE GROUP CAMPUS
LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1
LZ (PROPOSED)
LOT 1
snl. J o1 +
JAN. 2000
1..................................
WCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMEIMWP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-313-A.DOC
Page 9
EXHIBIT "A"
N72'37'08 W a distance of 404.43 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which
has a central angle of 55'00'00 , o radius of 474.00 feet, and a chord which bears
N45'07'08"W — 437.74 feet;
Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 455.01 feet to the beginning of a
curve to the right wn;ch has c central angle of 05'29'00", a radius of 1474.00 feet,
arc a chord which bears N14'52*38 W — 141.01 feet;
Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 141.07 feet;
"..ENCE N77'57'52-E c distance of 68,00 feet to the beginning of a non —tangent cure
to !ne left which has a central cnole of 05'29'00, a radius of 1406.00 feet, and e
chord which bears S74'52'38 E — 134.51 feet;
Along said non —tangent curve to the left, on arc distance of 134.56 feet to the
beginning of a curve to the left which has a central angle of 55'00'00", o radius of
406.00 feet, and a chord which bears S45'07'08"E — 374.94 feet;
Along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 389.73 feet to the end of said curve;
S72'37'08"E o distance of 404.43 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which
has a central angle of 5427'17 a radius of 474.00 feet, and a chord which bears
S45'23'30"E — 433.73 feet;
Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 450,50 feet to the end of said
curve;
S78'09'51"E a distance of 3.34 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which
has a central angle of 15'4429", a radius of 670.00 feet, and a chord which bears
SIO'17'27"E — 167.06 feet;
Along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 167.59 feet to the end of said
curve;
502'25'20'E a distance of 95.63 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left which
has a central angle of 73'12'27", o radius of 10.00 feet, and a chord which bears
S39'01'39'E — 71.93 feet:
Along said curve to the left, on arc distance of 72.78 feet to the end of said curve in
the west line of the aforementioned SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition;
THENCE SOO'09'22"E along the west line of said SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition, a
distance of 137.53 fee! to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 222,925 square
feet or 5.1777 acres of Icnd, more or less.
Sht. 2 0! A
,Art. 2CCO
NXOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES%ZBA\PENDING\480-313-A.DOC
Page 9
E
: �?i1Yi �sS SsSl iEisl' i! M
S ai
i
^apl=pIa! ,
"� >� iyl
� •�i�l 1 �
� y � a j
}
I� �I
H
I
09,14
*1r
N:\COMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENTWP-FILES'.ZBA\PENDING\480-3I3-A.DOC
Page 17
A
J
V N
_i -- _!
�.i!
CO x � j r._•
EXHIBIT "B"
Exhibit "B" to Ordinance No.
Pl D Development Standards
SABRE Non Residential Planned Unit Development
PURPOSE.
A. The purpose of this SABRE Non Residential Planned unit Development Ordinance
No. is to facilitate the development of a high quality, controlled access, master planned
headquarters for a major corporate user such as a "Fortune 500" company. The PUD includes
approximately 154.8 acres as described on Exhibit "A" to the PUD and as shown on the Concept
Plan arached as Exhibit "B- I" hereto.
B. It is anticipated that the Property will be developed as a secure (i.e., controlled access)
"campus style" corporate headquarters. Security may include a full perimeter fence with a
combination of attended or automatic access controls. Emergency access will be provided as
required by the City's Fire Marshal. Access design will include adequate areas to accommodate
vehicles that inadvertently approach the Property and must turn around without entering.
C. It is anticipated that the Property will be developed to include a private boulevard
designed to the City's construction standards for an "A4D arterial" with the exceptions that
(i) landscape medians may be left natural rather than irrigated; (ii) the six-foot bike lane will not
be required; (iii) the City's driveway ordinance will not apply; and (iv) the design speed and
geometry will be determined by the Property owner consistent with the "campus style"
atmosphere of the development (with a minimum design speed of 25 mph). The details of private
street design (including design speed, geometr,,, and access to public streets) will be provided as
part of each site plan. Maintenance of the private streets (to public street standards) will be the
sole responsibility of the Property owner.
D. It is anticipated that a portion of existing Kirkwood Boulevard (from SH-114 to the
boundary of the Property) and a portion of existing T.W. King Road (that lies between the
Property and Tract 2 of the MTP-IBM Addition No. 1) will both be abandoned and closed for
public use after the first phase of the development is ready for occupancy. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, however, continued access to such closed streets by Trophy Club's and the City's
emergency fire and ambulance vehicles will be allowed unless and until the Texas Department of
Transportation approves a two-way access road from Kirk -wood Boulevard to "old" T.W. King
Road. Such emergency access will be the same as required by the City's Fire Marshal. Public
use of "old" T.W. King Road west of said Tract 2 will continue.
E. The primary access from the Property to public streets will be provided by the private
streets shown on the Concept Plan; however, no employee access shall be permitted through the
access road to White Chapel Road. Emergency (including police, fire, ambulance, and utilities)
and security access to the Property may be provided by the access road to White Chapel Road
(also shown on the Concept Plan). It will also be necessary to use the White Chapel access road
for construction access for a limited period of six months after the first to occur of (i) the issuance
by the City of a building permit for the first phase of the office development or (ii) the issuance
by the City of a building permit for the bridge over the North Kirkwood Branch. This time period
may be extended by the City Council, in its reasonable discretion, upon a showing that an
extension is necessary due to circumstances bevond the reasonable control of the Property owner.
Zoning Cue No. ZA99-056
REVISED July 16, 1999
011907.0GG05:0435047.12
L CITY DiXS'.ORD'C.',SES'480-313.DOC
Page 18
EXHIBIT "B"
The Proper.,, owner agrees to commence construction of the North Kirkwood Branch bridge on
or before the date it commences construction of the first phase of the office development.
F. i ;e Propernr will be developed to include the dedication to the City of approximately
,.61 acres for a public park along the southeastern boundary of the Property adjacent to the South
Fork of Kirkwood Branch (as shown on the Concept Plan). The dedication will reserve the right
(but not the obligation) to maintain and landscape such park area at the Property owner's expense
and the right to review the design of any improvements to be located or constructed within such
park area. The Property owner will be responsible for the reasonable costs and expenses to
(i) complete the engineering design of a trail within the dedicated park area and (ii) design and
construct a pedestrian bridge within the dedicated park area to provide access across the South
Kirkwood Branch. The Ciry will include such park dedication in its regional trail system plan,
and (except as provided above) the City will be responsible for the construction and maintenance
of all improvements. All improvements will be designed to take maximum advantage of the
natural topography and to minimize the impact on all trees.
G. It is anticipated that the Property will be developed to include open space amenities for
employees, visitors and customers such as trails, parks and other pedestrian -oriented areas. These
amenities will be designed to take maximum advantage of the natural topography of the Property
and to minimize the impact on all trees. These amenities will also be designed to be
architecturally compatible with both the natural environment in which they are located and the
buildirics they serve. Details regarding these amenities will be provided as part of each site plan.
Because these amenities serve only "private" development within the Property, a formal
Pedestrian. Access Plan is not required.
H. In addition to open :;pace amenities for employees, visitors and customers, the Concept
Plan identifies Natural .Areas around the full perimeter of the Property. These Natural Areas,
together with the dedicated parkland, will buffer the Property from adjacent development.
;. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this SABRE Non Residential Planned Unit Development, the
following teals are hereby defined:
A. "Applicable City Ordinances" means the ordinances of the Ciry, as amended, that
regulate the development and use of land within the City including, but not limited to, Zoning
Ordinance No. 480 and the Uniform Building Code.
B. "Buildable Area" means all of the following areas (as shown on an approved final plat or
approved site plan): (i) the "footprint" of each building or structure, (ii) the area within six feet of
each building or structure foundation, (iii) public and private rights -of -way, (iv) public and
private utility and drainage easements; (v) fire lanes, and (vi) all parking areas (including parking
areas that exceed required parking).
C. "City" means the City of Southlake, Texas
D. "Concept Plan" means the concept plan attached as Exhibit B-1 to the PUD.
r. "Natural .Area" means those areas (as shown on the Concept Plan) that Nvill be preserved
as permanent open space to buffer the Property from adjacent development.
"P-ooerr," means the real property described on Exhibit A to the PUD
Zoning Case No. ZA99-056
REVISED July 16. 1999
0i1907.00005:0435047.12
L:.CITY DOCS ORD C.',SES 480-313.DOC
pue 19
EXHIBIT "B"
C. ?'_-D Standards' means the development standards established by Exhibit B to the PUD.
means this SABRE Non Residential Planned Unit Development zoning district,
Ordinance `;o. . including Exhibits A. B, B-!, and C attached hereto.
Except as defined above, all terms used in this PL7D shall have the meaning given to them by the
Applicable City Ordinances.
3. DEVELOPMENT STkNDARDS. The requirements of this Exhibit "B" (including the Concept
Plan) constitute the PUD Standards that apply to the Property and pursuant to which all development
within the Property shall occur. To the extent any aspect of development is regulated by these PUD
Standards, it is the intent that these PUD Standards shall be exclusive. For example, the landscape
standards set for'1h herein shall be the only landscape standards that apply to the Property. if these PUD
Standards do not regulate a particular aspect of development, then such particular aspect of development
shall be regulated by reference to those provisions of the Applicable City Ordinances that would
otherwise apply to the "0-2 Office" zoning district, as amended. In the event of any conflict,
inconsistency or ambiguity between the PUD Standards and the Applicable City Ordinances, the PUD
Standards shall control. If an amendment to any Applicable City Ordinance results in any non -conformity
within the Propem;, such non -conformity may be continued indefinitely, as a matter of right, and shall be
treated (for all purposes) as a legal use of the Property to the same extent as if the non -conformity had
never existed.
4. CONCEPT PLAN. The PUD is being processed with the Concept Plan attached hereto as
Exhibit "B- I" and incorporated as part of the PUD for all purposes. The Concept Plan identifies
(i) specific Natural Areas within which development is restricted, (ii) the approximate location of major
private streets, and (iii) the area within which parking structures will most likely be located. The
(OW remainder of the Property will be available for development in accordance with these PUD Standards and
the Applicable City Ordinances. All development within the Property must be consistent with the
Concept Plan. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between. the PUD Standards and the Concept
Plan, the PUD Standards shall control. Except as provided below, substantive changes to the Concept
Plan shall be considered a zoning change to the PUD and shall be processed and approved in accordance
with the Applicable City Ordinances. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the exact confi;sration of
the private streets shown on the Concept Plan may be changed to accommodate the final design speed and
geometry selected by the Property owner without such change constituting a zoning change to the PUD.
Any such change based on the final selected design speed and geometry shall be provided as part of each
site plan. Information contained on the Concept Plan that applies to land outside the Property is not part
of the PUD and is provided for informational purposes only.
5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The development of each portion, section or phase of the Property
must be in accordance with a development plan that has been processed and approved for such portion,
section or phase in accordance with all Applicable City Ordinances. There shall be no phasing or timing
requirement for the submission of development plans, and there shall be no minimum area for a
development plan. Except as hereinafter provided, development plans shall not require additional or
updated traffic impact analyses unless the cumulative total floor area proposed for development within the
Property has exceeded the maximum floor area assumed in the original traffic impact analysis that was
submitted with the application for the PUD. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if the original
de
traffic impact analysis does not address full build -out or does not inclutraffic conditions for interim
phases of development, then the City may require an updated traffic impact analysis with each
development plan. Once approved, a development plan shall not have an expiration date. This approach
is designed and intended to allow a large development to be approved in concept and then constructed in
phases. The Citv recognizes that it is not feasible and is unrealistic to require a highly detailed
Zoning Case No. ZA99-036
REVISED lull16. 1999
01 ! 907.00005:0435W.12
L.:',.CITY DOCS.ORD CASES 430-3!: DOC
P:n,e 20
EXHIBIT "B"
,2eveiopment cian to be completed on a ver-. large project when it is recognized that he project will be
nsr- cted in :.,:ions or phases over several years. The PUD, which is based on t-he Concept Plan,
reflects only zcr.ing approval of a basic concept and may not be implemented until full development plan
approval for each portion, section, or phase has been granted; however, the approval of the Concept Plan
entitles owners of the Property to rely on, and implement by subsequently approved development plans,
the type, intensir:, and densiry of uses set forth in the approved Concept Plan. Each development plan
must be in substantial conformance with the approved Concept Plan. Amendments to approved
development plans shall be reviewed by the Administrative Official and, if deemed to be in substantial
conformance w:th the approved development plans, shall be processed and approved in accordance with
all Applicable City Ordinances; otherwise, such amendments shall be processed as a zoning change to the
P 1--D.
6. SITE PLANS. The development of each portion, section or phase of the Property must be in
accordance with a site plan that has been processed and approved for such portion, section or phase in
accordance with all Applicable City Ordinances. There shall be no phasing or timing requirement for the
submission of site plans, and there shall be no minimum area for a site plan. Except as hereinafter
provided, site plans shall not require additional or updated traffic impact analyses unless the total
cumulative floor area proposed for development of the Property has exceeded the maximum floor area
assumed in the original traffic impact analysis that was submitted with the application for the PUD.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if the original traffic impact analysis does not address full build
out or does not include traffic conditions for interim phases of development, and if an updated traffic
impact analysis was not required as part of the approved development plan, the City may require an
updated traffic impact analysis with each site plan. Once approved, a site plan shall not have an
expiration date. This approach is designed and intended to allow a large development to be approved in
concept, to then, have development proceed though a series of phased development plans, and finally to
have construction proceed through a series of phased site plans. The City recognizes that it is not feasible
and is unrealistic to require a highly detailed site plan to be completed on a very large project when it is
recognized that the project will be constructed in sections or phases over several years. Each site plan
must be in substantial conformance with the approved development plan. Amendments to approved site
plans shall be reviewed by the Administrative Official and, if deemed to be in substantial ccnformance
with the approved site plans, shall be processed and approved in accordance with all Applicable City
Ordinances; otherwise, such amendments shall be processed as a zoning change to the PU'D.
USES.
A. Permitted Principal Uses
1. The intent of his PUD is to permit the broadest range of "high-tech" uses to
accommodate future technology changes in the fields of computer technology, information
technology, data and information processing, and all services related thereto. The City
recognizes, however, that future technology changes may occur beyond those that can be
described in the PUD Standards. The Administrative Official of the City shall be authorized to
interpret the following uses to accommodate future technology changes so as to achieve the intent
of the K:D.
_. The PUD shall permit those principal uses set forth in the "0-2," Office District, Section
19, of t:-.e Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended.
1. The PUD shall also permit "parking structures" and "private st eeis;'a—e,S,drives
(including gated/restricted access entry points" as principal uses.
Zoning C3u No. zA99-056
REVISED Jute 16,199
01 1907. 00005:1)43 5047.12
L:-.CITY UUi S'.ORD'CASES 480-313.DOC
Pace 21
EXHIBIT "B"
3. The PUD shall also permit "hotel" and "restaurant (with or without outside dining)" as
prncmal uses if approved by a Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 45 of the Zoning
Ordinance, as amended.
5. The PLC shall also permit the following additional principal uses; subject, however to
the condition that no certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any of such additional principal
uses until at least 400,000 square feet of office space within the Property is occupied and being
used as a corporate headquarters:
• Communications facility, including, but not limited to, facilities that utilize satellite
dishes, antennas, radio towers, fiber optic lines, telecommunications equipment, and all
related hardware, software and services. All satellite dishes, antennas, radio towers, and
similar communication equipment must be solely for use by the owners of the Property
and occupants or users of the improvements located thereon (and none of such equipment
may be sold or leased to third parties outside the PUD). All such equipment must be
located within buildings or structures; or, if located outside a building, must be screened
from view from all public roads. The location of all such equipment (including screening,
as applicable) will be provided with each site plan.
• Computer technology facility (including, but not limited to, facilities for research,
development, marketing, sales and service, leasing/rental, maintenance and repair,
distribution, and ware house/stora2e of computer hardware, software, and related
services).
• Conference center.
• Data/information processing center.
• Information technology facility, including, but not limited to, facilities for research,
development, marketing, sales and service, leasing/rental, maintenance and repair,
distribution, and warehouse/storage of information technology hardware, software, and
related services.
• Training center.
B. Accessory uses. All accessory uses (including those described in subsections "C" and
"D" below) must be operated principally for the development of or use of the Property as a
corporate headquarters and must be operated principally to serve or benefit tenants, employees,
guests, visitors and customers within the Property. 'I'he PUD shall permit those accessory uses
set forth in Section 34 of the Zoning Ordinance, as they apply to the "0-2", Office District, as
amended. Except as otherwise provided by these PUD Standards, accessory uses must comply
with Section 34 of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended. In addition, the following accessory uses
shall be permitted:
Covered pedestrian walkways.
Footbridges (designed to meet minimum NCTCOG standards).
Communication equipment, including, but not limited to, satellite dishes, antennas, radio
towers, fiber optic lines, telecommunications equipment, etc. All satellite dishes,
antennas, radio towers, and similar communication equipment must be solely for use by
the owners of the Property and occupants or users of the improvements located thereon
(and none of such equipment may be sold or leased to third parties outside the PUD). All
Zoning Cats No. Z499-056
WISED Juh -1991
19
O 1 190'.00005:043 5047.1212
L:'CITY DOCY.ORD'.CASES'180-317� DOC
Pa2e'_2
( EXHIBIT "B"
such equipment must be located within buildings or structures; or, if located outside a
`uilding, must be screened from view from all public roads. The location of all such
equipment (including screening, as applicable) will be provided with each site plan.
i tilities (including, but not limited to, utility buildings and structures, utility, distribution
lines, utility shop and storage, electric transformers, electric substations, telephone,
electric, cable, and fiber optic switching stations, water and sewage pumping stations
(above and below grade), water storage tanks and pumping systems (elevated or above
grade), and water, sewer, electric, and gas meters).
C. -�ccessory uses Within Principal Use Buildings. The following accessory uses shall only
be allowed within the same building as a permitted principal use without regard to the floor area
of such accessory uses:
• Banks and financial institutions (including ATMs).
• Beauty parlor/barbershop.
• Day nursery or equivalent child care facility.
• Drug store.
• Specialty retail.
• Health club; gmutasium.
• Job printing, lithography, printing, or blueprinting.
+ Laundry/dry cleaning (drop/pick).
• Mailing service (private).
• Maintenance vehicle fueling and service.
• Medical care facility/clinic.
• Newsstand.
• Post office (governmental).
• Printing, engraving and related reproductive services.
• Quick copy/duplicating services.
Recycling collection and/or storage.
• Restaurant, cafe, cafeteria, or dining facility (with or without outside dining).
• Security guard quarters.
• Shoe repair.
• Stationery and/or book store.
Temporary residential accommodations for employees/customers/visitors (maximum stay
shall be two consecutive weeks and full kitchens with cook tops shall be prohibited).
`,Varehouselstorage (inside).
D. Accessory Uses on Separate Building Sites. The following accessory uses shall be
allowed on a separate building site without regard to the floor area of such accessory uses;
6
L:\CITY DOCS\ORD CASES 490-313.Doc
Paee 23
Zoning Case No. ZA99-056
REVISED July 16, 1999
011907.00005:0435047.12
• EXHIBIT "B"
provided, however, none of the following accessori uses shall be allowed as a principal use. In
addition, no certificate of occupancy shall be issued by the City for any of the following
accessor: uses until (i) certificates of occupancy have been issued by the City for one or more
principal use buildings that contain (in the aggregate) at least 400,000 square feet of floor area;
and 01) at least 400,000 square feet of such principal use floor area are occupied and used as a
corporate headquarters:
Community facilities uses:
a. private parks;
b. recreational and open space to include playgrounds, parkways, greenbelts, ponds
and lakes, botanical gardens, nature centers, bird and wildlife sanctuaries,
pedestrian paths, bicycle paths, and equestrian bridal trails;
C. athletic, health, and sport facilities to include gyms, aerobic centers, spas,
swimming pools, athletic fields, and sport/tennis courts; and
d. other uses of a similar nature and character.
Day nursery or equivalent child care facility.
Health club/gymnasium.
• Heliporvverti-port if located at least 1,000 feet from (i) any residentially zoned lot and
(ii) any land located outside the Property and designated for single family use on the
City's comprehensive land use plan; limited, however, to use by the owners of the
Property and occupants or users of the improvements located thereon and subject to all
• applicable FAA requirements and approvals and subject to the designation of flight paths
(on the applicable development plan or site plan) that do not result in the overflight of
residential areas). An SUP shall be required if the proposed designated flight path will
result in the overflight of any residential areas (which SUP, if granted, may limit the
hours of operation). The Property owner shall notify the FAA in writing that any such
heliportiverti-port is "private" and not available for any public use. Unless otherwise
approved by the City Council, the combined number of individual take offs and landings
(including helistop/verti-stop trips) shall be limited to 20 per calendar month, and the
owner of the Property shall keep records which the City may review at any time.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the right to continue this use may be terminated
by the City Council if the FAA (or any other federal governmental authority) takes any
action that would preempt (or otherwise render invalid or ineffective) the take off and
landing flight path limitations set forth above.
•
Helistop/verti-stop port if located at least 1,000 feet from (i) any residentially zoned lot
and (ii) any land located outside the Property and designated for single family use on the
City's comprehensive land use plan; limited, however, to use by the owners of the
Property and occupants or users of the improvements located thereon and subject to all
applicable FAA requirements and approvals and subject to the designation of flight paths
(on the applicable development plan or site plan) that do not result in the overflight of
residential areas). An SUP shall be required if the proposed designated flight path will
result in the overflight of any residential areas (which SUP, if granted, may limit the
hours of operation). The Property owner shall notify the FAA in writing that any such
helistop/verti-stop is "private" and not available for any public use. Unless otherwise
approved by the City Council, the combined number of individual take offs and landings
(including helipoM'verti-port trips) shall be limited to 20 per calendar month, and the
owTt.zr of the Property shall keep records which the City may review at any time.
L:.CITY DCCS10RD%CASESt480-313.Doc
Page 24
Zoning Case No. ZA"-056
REVISED July 16,199
011907.00005-0435047.12
EXHIBIT "B"
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the right to continue this use may be terminated
by "he City Council if the FAA (or any other federal goverrimental authority) takes any
action that would preempt (or otherwise render invalid or ineffective) the take off and
ianding flight path limitations set forth above.
• Maintenance equipment storage (outside/screened). Such storage shall be limited to use
by the owners of the Property and occupants or users of improvements located thereon.
No storage will be provided to any person or business located outside the Property.
• Maintenance vehicle fueling and service.
• Medical care facility/clinic.
• Restaurant, cafe, cafeteria, or dining facility (with or without outside dining).
• Temporary residential accommodations for employees/customers/visitors (maximum stay
shall be two consecutive weeks and full kitchens with cook tops shall be prohibited).
• Temporary construction materials storage (for each phase of development, limited to the
time during which active construction is ongoing and for a period of 30 days thereafter).
• Temporary construction office (for each phase of development, limited to the time during
which active construction is ongoing and for a period of 30 days thereafter).
DEVELOPMENT UGULATIOVS.
A. Height
1. Buildings. Except as provided below, (a) no principal use building shall exceed
six (6) stories above grade, nor shall it exceed ninety (90) feet in height; and (b) no
accessory use building shall exceed three (3) stories above grade, nor shall it exceed
forty-six (46) feet in height.
Structured Parking. Except as provided below, no parking structure shall exceed
six (6) levels above grade, nor shall it exceed sixty (60) feet in height.
:. Architectural Features. Architectural features (i.e., portions of buildings or
structures not intended for occupancy) which are integral to the architectural style of the
building or structure (including spires, belfries, towers, cupolas, domes, feature walls and
similar features) shall not exceed fifty (50) feet above the height of the building; if
freestanding, they shall not exceed one hundred forty (140) feet in height; and both (i.e.,
roof -mounted and freestanding architecture features) shall be subject to the 4:1 residential
proximity slope requirement contained in Section 43.13(h) of the Zoning Ordinance.
4. Special Equipment. Mechanical equipment, penthouses, ventilation equipment,
satellite dishes, antennas, cooling towers, and other similar equipment shall not exceed
the actual height of the building by more than twenty-five (=5) feet, must be screened,
must be integral to the building, and shall be subject to the 4:1 residential proximity slope
requirement contained in Section 43.13(h) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Pitched Roofs. The height of a building (regardless of building size) with sloped
er pitched roofs shall be measured to a point 15 feet above the highest occupied floor
level. The high point of the sloped roof may exceed the height limitations set forth above
-raximum ninety (90) feet) by up to thirty-five (35) feet to allow up to a maximum
Zoning Case No. ZA99-056
REVISED July 16, 1999
011907.00005:0435047.12
L %CM DCCS.ORD CASES''450-313.DQ(.
Page 25
EXHIBIT "B"
height of one hundred twenty-five (125) feet and shall be subject to the 4:1 residential
proximirr slope requirement contained in Section 43.13(h) of the Zoning Ordinance. All
measurements shall be from grade, as defined by Ordinance No. 480, Section 4.2.
Setbacks
1. Front Yard. Except as provided below, the minimum front yard setback shall be
30 feet; however, up to 10% of the area of any building faeade may extend up to 15 feet
into any required front yard to accommodate building articulation design requirements.
Short term visitor and customer parking shall be allowed in required front yards. No
front yard adjustments shall be required to achieve consistency or compatibility with
surrounding or future public development.
Side Yard. Except as provided below, there shall be no minimum side yard
setback. No side yard adjustments shall be required to achieve consistency or
compatibility with surrounding or future public development.
3. Rear Yard. Except as provided below, the minimum rear yard setback shall be
10 feet.
4. Residential Proximity Slope. Notwithstanding the minimum setbacks set forth
above, buildings within 400 feet of property zoned for single family uses shall have a
minimum setback from the property line adjacent to such single family property of 40
feet or a distance that will not cause any building to exceed a height produced by a 4:1
slope line from the single family property (as contained in Section 43.13(h) of the Zoning
Ordinance), whichever produces the greater setback.
5. S.H. No. 114. Notwithstanding the setbacks set forth above, the minimum
setback along SH-114 shall be 50 feet.
6. Projections. Every part of a required yard shall be open to the sky, unobstructed
by a building, except for the ordinary projections of sills, belt courses, cornices, and
ornamental features not exceeding 48 inches.
Accessory Buildings. Accessory buildings may be located anywhere within the
Property (but not within any required setback).
S. Measurement of Setbacks. Setbacks shall apply to all private streets within the
Property and shall be measured from the right-of-way line (whether established by platted
lot, easement, or other instrument).
C. Maximum Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage for all buildings (excluding
parking structures) shall not exceed 50% of the total area of the Property.
D. Maximum Impervious Coverage. The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed
65% of the total area of the Property.
�. Floor Area. There shall be no maximum floor area ratio for any improvements; however,
t::e maximum total floor area within the Propem, (being the combination of floor area for all
principal uses and accessory uses but excluding parking structures) shall be limited to 3.5 million
square feet.
Zoning Cue No. ZA99-056
REVISED July 16,199
011907.00005:0435047.12
L`�CITY DOCS'.ORD C.NSES1.480-313.DOC
Pate 26
EXHIBIT "B"
PAR-KING/LOADING
A. Parkins Soaces Reouired. At least one parking space shall be provided for each 300
square feet of "principal -use" floor area developed within the Property. No additional spaces
shall be required for any accessory use floor area.
B. Location of Parking Spaces. All required parking spaces shall be located within the
Properrr, however no parking shall be allowed within the Natural ?seas shown on the Concept
Plan.
C. Parkins Soace Size. All parking spaces shall be at least 8 % feet wide and IS feet long.
Structural columns within any parking structure may project into the, perimeter of "head -in"
parking spaces up to one half the cross -sectional area of the column.
D. Off -Street Loading/Service Areas. At least one off -sweet loading/service area shall be
provided for each 200,000 square feet of "principal-usP" floor area developed within the Property.
No additional area shall be required for any accessory use floor area. Development of the
Property as a private, campus -style corporate headquarters offers an opportunity to consolidate
loading and service functions within one or more buildings or one or more locations. Such
consolidated locations minimize the need for multiple loading./service areas and isolate large
truck traffic to a few selected locations within the campus. Smaller scale distribution is then
permitted. The location of such consolidated areas will be shown on all site plans.
10. ARCHITECTURAL STA-N'DARDS.
A. Building Materials; Masonry Requirements. Buildings within the Property may be
constructed of a variety of different building materials, and there shall be no minimum masonry
requirement. Building materials shall include masonry materials, as defined in Ordinance No.
557, architectural concrete, architectural metal panels, glass, and other similar materials. Pre -cast
concrete panels (including "tilt -wall") may be used for accessory -use maintenance buildings that
are not visible from public rights -of -way. In addition, the facade of any parking structure that is
visible east of the park dedication land shown on the Concept Plan shall (if constructed of
architectural concrete) include an architectural treatment (e.g., texture, color, relief, or detail).
B. Reflective Glass. Any individual building facade may be 100% glass; however, no more
than 80% of the total facade area of all buildings within the Property shall be glass. The
maximum outward solar reflectivity of glass used shall be 35%.
C. Facade Articulation. It is the intent of this PUD to comply with the spirit and intent of
the City's requirement for building facade articulation standards; however, it is also the intent of
this PUD to avoid the imposition of a rigid mathematical formula to achieve such articulation.
Consequently, this PUD does require that building facades include design articulation that will be
approved with each site plan. Facade articulation may be achieved for individual buildings
through a combination of design techniques including, but not limited to, projections, overhangs,
and incisions/cuts. Facade articulation may also be achieved by considering the effect of (i) the
location of one building to another, (ii) the manner in which buildings are grouped, and
(iii) variations in architectural surface treatments such as color, texture, relief, and detail. The
facade articulations standards for parking structures will differ somewhat from the standards for
ctfice buildings because of their intended use (i.e., storing cars), reduced design flexibility, and
10
L: CITY DOCS`.ORD G.�ES 430-313.DOC
Page 27
Zoning Cue No. ZA99-056
REVISED July 16, 1999
011907.00005:04 3 5047.12
EXHIBIT "B"
the fact that visibility of such structures from SH-1 14 will be minimal (with no visibility of such
strum:: e.s during any but the very last phases of development).
D. Exposed Structural/Architectural Columns. Structural concrete or steel elements may
remain exposed if given some architectural treatment (e.a., color, texture, relief, or detail).
E. Roof Design Standards. All structures shall be constructed with either a pitched roof, flat
roof with a parapet, mansard roof. or any combination thereof. All flat roof surfaces will be
screened from ground level views. Parking structure decks shall not be considered roofs. Roofs
of stairwells and elevator machine rooms and other similar spaces shall be exempt from roofing
design standards so long as thev are not be visible from ground level.
11. SCREENING. The following improvements shall be screened from view from public rights -of -
way located outside the Property: mechanical equipment, rooftop appurtenances, satellite dishes,
antennas, radio towers, outside storage, trash/recycling receptacles, and off street loading/service areas.
No screening shall be required from any rights -of -way within the Property, and no screening shall be
required for any surface parking lots or for any parking structures. Screening shall be accomplished with
masonry, landscaping, or any combination thereof.
12. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS. The size of the Property, the "campus -style" development being
proposed, the utilization of parking structures to minimize surface parkin„ and the requirement for at
least 351,'o pervious cover will create a developed site with vast areas of open space that will include
existing, natural vegetation, including thousands of mature trees. Consequently, there is no need for
narrow buffervards (and the related planting requirements) typically required for much smaller
commercial sites. Nevertheless, in addition to the natural vegetation and trees that will be preserved,
additional landscape standards are required for (i) the Natural Areas shown on the Concept Plan,
(ii) interior landscape areas based on building size, and (iii) parking island landscaping for surface
parking lots. The interior landscape area requirements and parking island requirements are very similar to
the City's existing requirements; however, more liberal planting credits are allowed for enhanced paving
and to preserve existing trees. Such credits are appropriate for a campus -style development and will
strongly encourage retaining natural tree groupings and trees near future building sites. Such credits will
also simplify and reduce the maintenance costs associated with large areas of small shrubs and ground
cover.
A. Natural Areas. The Concept Plan identifies Natural Areas up to 50 feet wide and larger
that virtually encircle the Property. These Natural Areas will be preserved as permancnt open
space, and, together with the park dedication, will buffer the Property from adjacent development.
With the exception of small security structures (i.e., "guardhouses"), no paved surfaces or
buildings or structures of any kind may be located within the Natural Areas without site plan
approval. The intent is to preserve these areas in a natural, undisturbed condition; however,
additional landscaping may be planted within them at the option of the Property owner. Natural
Areas may be irrigated or left natural.
B. Interior Landscape Areas. Subject to the reductions set forth below, the amount of
interior landscape area required within the Property shall be computed 'based on all buildings
(excluding parking structures) within the Property, and for each building (excluding parking
structures) shall equal 50% of the largest floor area of such building. The following plantings
shall be required within the Property based on the interior landscape area as computed above: one
canopy -.ee per 600 square feet; one accent tree per 300 square feet; one shrub (15 inch deciduous
or 12 inch evergreen) per 60 square feet; and 10°,o of such interior landscape area must be planted
as ground cover. These required plantings shall be reduced as follows:
a
L. CITY DUCS'.ORD-.CASES'.190-313.DOC
Pale 28
Zoning Cate No. ZA99-056
REVISED Ju1v 16,199
01 190 7.00005:0435047. t 2
EXHIBIT " B "
i Existins Plant Credits. Existing trees ,vhich are within 250 feet of any building
shall reduce the required plantings as follows:
Size of Existins Tree Planting Reductions
Canoov .Accent Shrubs
1. " — 5" caliper I or 2 or 6
6" — I I" caliper 2 07 3 or 12
12" and greater 3 or 4 or 18
2. Substitute Plantings. One additional canopy tree may be substituted for 10
shrubs or 500 square feet of ground cover. One additional accent tree may be substituted
for five sh.-ubs or 250 square feet of ground cover.
3. Enhanced Pavement Credits. For each square foot of enhanced pavement area,
the required landscape area shall be reduced by 0.5 square feet, up to a maximum overall
reduction of 25%.
C. Parking Lot Landscaping.
1. Structured Parkins. There shall be no landscaping requirements applicable to
parking structures.
2. Surface Parking.
a. Planter Islands. Planter islands shall be provided in all surface parking
areas on the basis of 10 square feet of landscape area for each parking space
provided. Where reasonably possible, each row of parking spaces shall provide
the required landscape area; however, islands may be placed near buildings,
throughout the parking area, or at the end of the rows away from buildings.
These island requirements may be modified in situations where it would be
beneficial to combine an awkward or hazardous island into a larger island.
Planter islands shall have a minimum width of eight feet back-to-back if curbed
or nine feet edge -to -edge if no curb is intended, and shall be 18 feet long. Planter
island landscape areas count towards the total required interior landscape area.
b. Existing Trees. The following variations to the planter island
requirements shall be permitted to preserve existing trees. For existing trees, the
minimum width of the planter island shall be as follows:
5" caliper or less = 8 foot minimum width
6" — 12" caliper = 12 foot minimum width
greater than 12" caliper = 18 foot minimum width
C. Planting Requirements. A minimum of 50% of all planter islands shall
contain a minimum of one canopy tree (with the remaining area in shrubs, ground
cover, grasses, or seasonal color). Planter islands which have light poles for
iig^Ming the parking areas may substitute two accent trees for the required canopy
12
Zoning Case No. Z16, -056
199
REVISED July 16, 1999
0 11907.00005:043 5047.12
L:\CITY DOGS\ORD`CASES`,.480-313.DOC
Page 29
EXHIBIT " B "
tree. At least 50% of all trees must be 4 inch caliper or greater, and the
remainder must be two inch caliper or greater.
13. FENCING. Perimeter fencing visible from SH-114 will be constructed of wrought iron,
mason.. other architectural metal, or anv combination thereof. Other materials that are architecturally
compatible with the buildings visible from SH-114 may also be used if approved by a site plan. Fencing
that is not visible From SH-1 14 and that is generally screened by vegetation will be constructed of coated,
dark -colored chain link. No fencing articulation shall be required The details of fence design will be
provided as part of each site plan.
14. ACCESS CONTROL STRUCTURES. Access control structures that are visible from any
public rights -of -way outside the Property will be constructed of materials that are the same as or
substantially similar to the buildings visible from such rights -of -way. Such structures may also be
constructed of anv other material that is architecturally compatible with the buildings that are visible,
provided such other materials are approved on a site plan. Access control structures that are not visible
from public rights -of -way outside the Property may be constructed of masonry, wood, architectural
concrete, metal panels, or any combination thereof.
15. PARKSrfRAILS/OPEN SPACE. Except as provided in the Concept Plan, there shall be no
other requirements for parks, trails, or public open space.
16. DRIVEWAY REQUIREMENTS. None of the standards or requirements for driveways
included in Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, shall apply to the Property. However, all
development plans must include an "on -site" driveway and driveway -related traffic analysis performed by
a professional traffic consultant; which analysis shall demonstrate, to the reasonable satisfaction of the
City Council, that the driveway design does not create a traffic or safety hazard.
17. TREE PRESERVATION.
Structured Parking. In order to mitigate the impact of large areas of surface parking (and
t=e substantial tree removal that would necessarily result), the Property will be developed with at
mast two multi -level parking structures to accommodate at least 80% of the required parking.
T^.e most likely location for the parking structures (and the location with the least impact on
existing tree cover) is the area identified on the Concept Plan. As provided by the City's existing
Tree Preservation Ordinance, the "footprint" of such parking structures (plus an area within six
feet of the foundations) will be exempt from tree protection and tree replacement requirements.
Because the use of parking structures will avoid paving large areas for surface parking, and
because there is little design flexibility in the location of such parking structures, efforts to select
garage "footprints" that minimize tree removal will not be required. All parking structures must
t,e screened from Kirkwood Hollow by planting at least four canopy trees per 100 linear feet of
s:.,icture fagade that faces Kirkwood Hollow.
B. Other Improvements. As provided by the City's existing Tree Preservation Ordinance,
-e Buildable Areas for improvements other than structured parking shall also be exempt from
protection and tree replacement requirements. Notwithstanding such exemption, however,
Property owner shall use commercially reasonable efforts to identify Buildable Areas in an
a:-empt to minimize the removal of quality trees with a diameter of six inches or greater measured
- : feet above the ground. Such efforts shall not, however, require significant relocations of
.__dual Buildable Areas or require Buildable Areas to be located so as to significantly alter or
adversely affect the relationship of buildings, streets, and other improvements or otherwise
antly alter or adversely affect the overall master planning for development of the Property.
13
Zoning Cue No. ZA99-056
REVISED JUIV 16, 1999
011907.00005:0435047.12
L. CITY DOCS',ORD CASES',130-313.DOC
Pale 30
0 EXHIBIT "C"
•
•
UTITY DOCSIORD CASES1130-311DOC
Page 31
This page reserved for the City Council motion.
0 EXHIBIT "C"
•
L:•.CITY JOCS'.ORD'.CASES':150-313.DOC
Pap 32
This page reserved for the City Council motion.
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
March 16, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-008
PROJECT: Sabre Corporate Campus
REQUEST: On behalf of Sabre Group, TSG Trust 1999-1 is requesting approval of a Revised
Development Plan.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing.
2. Consider revised development plan request.
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
(D) Development Plan Review Summary
(E) Surrounding Property Owner Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owner Letters
(G) Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Case No.
ZA01-008
Agenda Item
7F
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: TSG Trust 1999-1
APPLICANT: Sabre Group
PROPERTY SITUATION: On the southeast corner of the intersection of State Highway 114 and
Kirkwood Drive.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: An approximately 6.5 acre portion of an approximately 156 acre tract
described as Lot 4, Block A, MTP-IBM Addition No. 1; Tracts 1, 1AI, 1C,
2A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A4, 2A5, 2A7, and portions of Tracts 2A and 2A6 situated
in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015; portions of Tracts 1 and 1C
situated in the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134; portions of Tracts
3A1, 3AIA, 3AIA2, 3A3A1, 413, 4B1, 4B2, situated in the Rees D. Price
Survey, Abstract No. 1207; and portions of Kirkwood Drive and East T.W.
King rights -of -way.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use, Medium Density Residential, 100-Year Flood Plain
CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District and "NR-PUD"
Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2," Office
District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are
generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies;
training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and verti-
port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses.
P&Z ACTION: March 8, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Development Plan Review
Summary No. 1, dated March 2, 2001.
P&Z SPEAKERS: None
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 16,
2001.
The purpose of this request is to include the Kirkwood Boulevard and E.
T.W. King rights -of -way and to add the proposed visitor center into the
boundary of the Sabre Project development plan. The review of this plan is
limited to the specific area of these additions only. This site is subject to all
previous conditions of approval for the Sabre Project Zoning and Concept
Plan (Case ZA99-056 and Ordinance 480-313) and Development Plan (Case
ZA 99-090).
NACommunity Deve1opment\WP-FILES\MEM0\200Icases\O1-008DP.doc
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A
ZA01-008 7F Page 1
0
Case No.
ZA01-008
Vicinity Map
Sabre
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
W E
S
Agenda Item
7F
Attachment B
Page 1
A( 'Just N mll[ I v l!.1 , Il l.1 0
k -
�
S ai
d
� M
�
+�.'
—
0�.6666
Ow
H,
4
f P,
Rol,
2
Agenda
7F
C,
LU
ei,
r
0 Lt) w;e
5-5
-
, o
LLJ --J
o k�
4
6
_z
s,
P
. iv
�F
�0416
tw,
41,
c
1
Case No.: ZA01-008
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Review No.: One
Project Name: Development Plan — Sabre Corporate Campus, Phase II
APPLICANT:
Sabre Group
4255 Amon Carter
Fort Worth, TX 76115
Phone: (817) 963-1118
Fax: (817) 967-4914
Date of Review: 03/16/01
ENGINEER:
Brockette, Davis, and Drake, Inc.
4144 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1100
Dallas, TX 75204
Phone: (214) 824-3647
Fax: (214)824-7064
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 03/16/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073.
Transfer all information from the previously approved development plan for this project.
Informational Comments:
* The purpose of this request is to include the Kirkwood Boulevard and E. T.W. King rights -of -way and
to add the proposed visitor center into the boundary of the Sabre Project development plan. The
review of this plan is limited to the specific area of these additions only. This site is subject to all
previous conditions of approval for the Sabre Project Zoning and Concept Plan (Case ZA99-056 and
Ordinance 480-313) and Development Plan (Case ZA 99-090).
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D
ZA 01-008 7F Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Sabre C(
I 10-4 T17 TT
Property Owner
Zoning
Land Use Description
Acreage
1. A. Oien
1. AG
1. Low Density Residential
1.
3.61
2. IBM
2. NR-PUD
2. Mixed Use
2.
0.40
3. TXU
3. NR-PUD
3. Mixed Use
3.
2.15
4. Brazos Electric
4. NR-PUD
4. Mixed Use
4.
3.92
5. A. Oien
5. AG
5. Low Density Residential
5.
3.15
6. IBM
6. NR-PUD
6. Medium Density Residential
6.
4.08
7. IBM
7. NR-PUD
7. Medium Density Residential
7.
69.05
8. IBM
8. NR-PUD
8. Mixed Use
8.
48.54
9. MTP-IBM
9. NR-PUD
9. Mixed Use
9.
20.15
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-008 7F Page I
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Sabre Corporate Campus, Phase II
NOTICES SENT: Six
RESPONSES: None
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA01-008 7F Page 1
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
March 16, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-023
PROJECT: Portion of proposed Lot 1, Block 1, and Kirkwood Boulevard, Sabre Corporate
Campus, Phase II
REQUEST: On behalf of Sabre Group, TSG Trust 1999-1 is requesting approval of a Revised Site
Plan.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing.
2. Consider revised site plan request.
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
(D) Site Plan Review Summary
(E) Surrounding Property Owner Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owner Letter
(G) Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Case No.
ZA01-023
Agenda Item
7G
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: TSG Trust 1999-1
APPLICANT: Sabre Group
PROPERTY SITUATION: On the southeast corner of the intersection of State Highway 114 and
Kirkwood Drive.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Being an approximately 156 acre tract described as Lot 4, Block A, MTP-IBM
Addition No. 1; Tracts 1, 1A1, 1C, 2A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A4, 2A5, 2A7, and
portions of Tracts 2A and 2A6 situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract
No. 1015; portions of Tracts 1 and IC situated in the James B. Martin
Survey, Abstract No. 1134; portions of Tracts 3A1, 3A1A, 3A1A2, 3A3A1,
413, 4B 1, 4132, situated in the Rees D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207; and
portions of Kirkwood Drive and East T.W. King rights -of -way.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use, Medium Density Residential, 100-Year Flood Plain
CURRENT ZONING: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District and "NR-PUD"
Non -Residential Planned Unit Development District with "0-2," Office
District uses and certain other permitted and accessory uses which are
generally related to communication, computer, and information technologies;
training and conference centers; parking structures; heliport/stop and verti-
port/stop; hotel, restaurant, retail and office uses.
P&Z ACTION: March 8, 2001; Approved (6-0) Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated
March 2, 2001, and to approve a fence height not to exceed 6'6" for the
vertical posts with the highest cable being 6' in height with no more than
seven cables total.
P&Z SPEAKERS: None
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 16, 2001.
This review is limited to the proposed visitor center, guard house and
perimeter fencing proposed. All other areas of this site plan are subject to the
conditions of approval for the previous plans.
NACommunity Deve1opment\WP-FILES\MEM0\200Icases\01-023SP.doc
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A
ZA01-023 7G Page 1
Case No.
ZA01-023
Vicinity Map
Sabre
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
W E
S
Agenda Item
7G
Attachment B
Page 1
d M
Ill
U-
w
_j
1111111111,
-ase No.
A01-001'
UVI
7.1 1 ki 1 7.1 W., 11
w
C14
;K"?
e -
01AN
-1—A
LU
0
cc
23
Lu
<
<
0'
yj
Im
Ifs
Y:
11
A
J
�iAttachmen
Paq
c
1
El
El
a�� y 7 p ypj}q gy��9 gg CF l pggg ok5
CL
z
68
P
co
0
CL o
:E
�2 Q
CD
. 6r;
rL
OR
0 co
Fin
LLJ
co
oc
11w
Z)
CZL)
\I-t "
tio,
SEA SE
----------
vV001)
I
KKR 0111
0
wools
----------- ---------------
so
71
♦
10
♦
100
100
10
No. ♦♦Agenda Item Attachme t C
1-008 7G Pa e2
UVI
pp ii) I j -
EL
En
No.
-008
Id
0
L
Mm
0-�
Agenda Item
7G
zi
WI
'®rl3.
Ali � ��
II
it ii
FONO
Attachment
Page 3
-r-
CDeO
R
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA01-023 Review No.: One Date of Review: 03/16/01
Project Name: Site Plan — Sabre Corporate Campus, Phase II
APPLICANT:
Sabre Group
4255 Amon Carter
Fort Worth, TX 76115
Phone: (817) 963-1118
Fax: (817) 967-4914
ARCHITECT:
HKS Inc.
1919 McKinney Ave.
Dallas, TX 75201-1753
Phone:
Fax:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 3/16/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073.
Informational Comments:
* The applicant has met the requirements of previous reviews.
* This review is limited to the proposed visitor center, guard house and perimeter fencing proposed.
All other areas of this site plan are subject to the conditions of approval for the previous plans.
* The buildings proposed for are in compliance with the development regulations for the Sabre
Project.
* The pipe and cable fencing shown along S.H. 114 is proposed as an "Architectural Metal Fencing"
by the applicant which is a permitted material under the development regulations for the Sabre
Project.
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D
ZA 01-008 7G Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Sabre
Property Owner
Zonin2
Land Use Description
Acreage
1. A. Oien
1. AG
1. Low Density Residential
1.
3.61
2. IBM
2. NR-PUD
2. Mixed Use
2.
0.40
3. TXU
3. NR-PUD
3. Mixed Use
3.
2.15
4. Brazos Electric
4. NR-PUD
4. Mixed Use
4.
3.92
5. A. Oien
5. AG
5. Low Density Residential
5.
3.15
6. IBM
6. NR-PUD
6. Medium Density Residential
6.
4.08
7. USA
7. AG
7. Corp of Engineers
7.
16.86
8. USA
8. AG
8. Corp of Engineers
8.
27.00
9. 300 Covenent St Corp
9. R-PUD
9. Medium Density Residential
9.
3.41
10. 300 Covenent St Corp
10. R-PUD
10. Medium Density Residential
10.
4.92
11. 300 Covenent St Corp
11. R-PUD
11. Medium Density Residential
11.
9.63
12. Maguire Partners
12. NR-PUD
12. Mixed Use
12.
79.35
13. Maguire Partners
13. NR-PUD
13. Mixed Use
13.
14.38
14. Maguire Partners
14. AG
14. Mixed Use
14.
3.04
15. MTP-IBM
15. NR-PUD
15. Mixed Use
15.
20.15
Case No.
ZA01-023
Agenda Item
7G
Attachment E
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Sabre Corporate Campus, Phase II
NOTICES SENT: Six
RESPONSES: None
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZAOI-023 7G Page I
City of Southlake
p Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
March 16, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-014
PROJECT: Sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption
REQUEST: On behalf of Lakewood, Inc., Street & Sons, Inc., is requesting approval of a Specific
Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption per
Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (1) and Section 45.6.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing.
2. Consider Specific Use Permit.
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Exhibit
(D) Surrounding Property Owner Map
(E) Surrounding Property Owner Responses
(F) Resolution No. 01-016
STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086)
Case No. Agenda Item
ZA01-014 711
19
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Lakewood, Inc.
APPLICANT: Street & Sons, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: On the southeast corner of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M.
1709) and Crooked Lane.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 5R2, Thomas Easter No. 474 Addition.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial
District and limited "I- I" Light Industrial District uses.
P&Z ACTION: March 8, 2001; Approved (6-0) limiting the SUP to 10 years.
P&Z SPEAKERS: None
STAFF COMMENTS: A site exhibit is included as attachment `C' in this packet.
Case No. Agenda Item
ZA01-014 7H
Attachment A
Page 1
fl
(WY EAST
Case No.
ZA01-014
Vicinity Map
Snookies
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
1►1
W E
S
Agenda Item
7H
Attachment B
Page 1
Case No.
ZA01-014
MT w n auvnauioe Hxvntuas S s i! 0
2T3 9NO VZV"id RNOISMD
a
� E
k�� z
All .I n BF M
i� gQ1l55 [[ 1p1p IaaIn� r�r s q$$y®y®q a z 0 � 61i U � �w
8 o T
9i I oCIQ
V
z•
LL-
00 { I
nano
n¢IIulo
rnn. u
OS SE
ua3�er
EMWMFMWi
I
-
I
O �
/�
ii
ii8
U 0
1 I
i f
1
/ r 11
1
I F 1
1
1 1
d�911R1��91; �
m—T'
1 t SN: 7c7g::.6 ss 5
4A
Agenda Item
7H
III
I.
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Snookies
Property Owner
Zonin2
Land Use Description
Acrea e
1. Caddy Prop. Mgmt.
1. S-P-2
1. Retail Commercial
1.
1.95
2. Jaqua Enterprises
2. S-P-2
2. Retail Commercial
2.
0.70
3. Shurgard
3. S-P-2
3. Industrial
3.
4.57
4. Cornerstone Bus. Pk.
4. 1-1
4. Industrial
4.
1.58
5. Cornerstone Bus. Pk.
5. C-1
5. Office Commercial
5.
2.57
6. Cornerstone Bus. Pk.
6. AG
6. Retail Commercial
6.
0.41
7. Cornerstone Bus. Pk.
7. AG
7. Retail Commercial
7.
0.84
Case No.
ZA01-014
Agenda Item
7H
Attachment D
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic
beverages for on -premise consumption
NOTICES SENT: Four
RESPONSES: None
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-014 7H Page 1
Resolution No.01-016
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO.01-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE
PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
FOR ON -PREMISE CONSUMPTION ON PROPERTY
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 5R2,
BLOCK 1, THOMAS EASTER NO. 474 ADDITION, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED
IN CABINET A, SLIDE 4900, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS. MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO
AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise
consumption has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the
property zoned as "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail District and "I-1"
Light Industrial District uses; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1 (1) and 45.6 of the City's
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have
given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested
and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such
Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare
of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Case No.
ZA01-014
Agenda Item
7H
Attachment F
Page 1
`..
Resolution No.01-016
Page 2
SECTION 1.
A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise
consumption on the property being legally described as a portion of Lot 5R2, Block 1, Thomas
Easter No. 474 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to
the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4900, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, more fully and
completely described in Exhibit "A", and as depicted on the approved development plan attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the
provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein.
The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the
granting of this Specific Use Permit:
1.
2.
3.
4.
SECTION 2.
This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS
ATTEST:
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
Case No.
ZA01-014
DAY OF 92001.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
By:
Rick Stacy, Mayor
Agenda Item
7H
Attachment F
Page 2
Resolution No.01-016
Page 3
`.. APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
City of Southlake, Texas
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA01-014 7H Page 3
,%W
Resolution No. 01-016
Page 4
EXHIBIT "A"
A PORTION OF LOT 5R2, BLOCK 1, THOMAS EASTER NO. 474 ADDITION, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 4900, PLAT
RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS.
Case No.
ZA01-014
Agenda Item
7H
Attachment F
Page 4
PIR
wei;
ts
f
t
1,
11,
;j'!
AS
0 U F H L A
TOWN SQUARE
Art ID the $qUere
A.pr!l 27, m 29, 2001
■ Manned
entrances/exits
Road Closures
Portable
Restroorns
ELM
CIP en
Open
hill;;; 1,; RTI rr, "ryt'i i"'F771 mTTHqrff-"'!] T "U.'.
kill bf'9
" ?
U
opm
Road Closures
�11
:9
Resolution No.0 1 -0 16
Page 5
Case No.
Mj- 014
EXHIBIT "B"
wrvewiac
0 _VZV*ld alloIsHaKsoa
CD
C'2
rit T.7,.
z
Agenda Item
711
Attachment F
Page 5
Resolution No.01-016
Page 6
EXHIBIT "C"
This page reserved for the approved City Council motion.
Case No. Agenda Item
ZA01-014 7H
Attachment F
Page 6
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
March 16, 2001
CASE NO: ZA00-136
PROJECT: Proposed Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition
REQUEST: On behalf of owners, J. W. and Constance Richards, Star Real Estate Company is
requesting approval of the plat showing for Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19, O.W. Knight No.
899 Addition.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing.
2. Consider plat showing.
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
(D) Plat Review Summary
(E) Surrounding Property Owner Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owner Responses
(G) Blue Line Copies of Plans (for Council and Commission Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086)
Case No.
ZA00-136
Agenda Item
8A
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNERS: J. W. and Constance Richards
APPLICANT: Star Real Estate Company
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (F. M.
1709) approximately 390' west of Byron Nelson Parkway. The plat proposes
4 buildable lots approximately 1 acre in size. The plat is in compliance with
the recently approved concept plan.
HISTORY: The City Council approved a change of zoning and concept plan for "S-P-2"
with "0-1" office district uses on February 6, 2001.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a site plan
for Lot 19 on February 22, 2001. This site plan will go before the City
Council on March 6, 2001 for consideration.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 5D1 and 5D5, O. W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899; and being 4.042
acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1 " Office District uses
P&Z ACTION: March 8, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated
March 02, 2 00 1.
P&Z SPEAKERS: None
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated March 02, 2001.
N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00- I 36PS.doc
Case No.
ZA00-136
Agenda Item
8A
Attachment A
Page 1
Case No.
ZA00-136
Vicinity Map
O.W. Knight Addition, Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19
1000 0 1000 2000 Feet
W TE
S
Agenda Item
8A
Attachment B
Page 1
A
a
Case No.
ZAO -136 A
'3r I I
5�4 I I 1ga
Ed
9
fig
e,a Aaenda Item
8A
1
:t
pp
pp
yy°
R
o
�
S
p o
Pie 1
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA00-136 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 3/02/01
Project Name: Plat Showing — Lots 16-19, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition
APPLICANT:
Ed Gibbons
Phone: (817) 975-2439
Fax:
ARCHITECT:
Loyd Bransom Surveyors
Charles B. Hooks
Phone :(817) 834-3477
Fax :(817) 831-9818
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/14/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073.
1. Show all survey lines with name and abstract which are adjacent to or within the property boundary.
2. Provide Common Access Easements 2' wider and centered over the driveways and drive lanes
according to the Concept Plan for this site.
3. A Plat Revision is currently in process for the City of Southlake Municipal Complex to the south.
Show and label the City plat information prior to submitting final mylars (City to provide).
Informational Comments:
A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" indicating that there are no delinquent taxes owed on the subject
property from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County
records. A copy of this information may be obtained from the Tarrant county Tax
Assessor/Collector's Office located at 100 E. Weatherford St. in Ft. Worth (across from the old red
courthouse). There is a service charge of $10 per account for this certificate. For more information
contact the Assessor/Collector's office at (817) 884-1103.
Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original
signatures.
Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also
required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original
signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than
signatures or seals, appear on the plat.
N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00- 13 6ps2. doe
Case No. Agenda Item
ZA00-136
8A
Attachment D
Page 1
0
Surrounding Property Owners
O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition
Propertv Owner
Zoning
Land Use Description
Acreage
1. B. McCoy
1. SF -IA
1. Low Density Residential
1.
1.40
2. R. Stevenson
2. AG
2. Office Commercial
2.
3.42
3. J. Holt
3. C-2
3. Office Commercial
3.
1.13
4. Southern Home Realty
4. C-2
4. Office Commercial
4.
1.15
5. Nelson/Southlake IV
5. R-PUD
5. Office Commercial
5.
1.24
6. Nelson/Southlake JV
6. S-P-1
6. Office Commercial
6.
1.16
7. City of Southlake
7. CS
7. Public/Semi-Public
7.
12.43
8. Bes-Tex Financial
8. S-P-2
8. Low Density Residential
8.
5.92
Case No.
ZA00-136
Agenda Item
8A
Attachment E
Page 1
�W
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition
NOTICES SENT: Eight
RESPONSES: One response was received from within the 200' notification area:
• Robert Stevenson, 2113 Taxco, Carrollton, TX, in favor, "This
is a good plan for sensible development". (Received February
28, 2001).
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F
ZA00-136 8A Page 1
Cr_
D
O
7K
U
C
Ui
�J
C
fD
Z,
071
C
O
U
ra
(n
Cr
a3
CL)
OUT
r-
L>_I
Q
D
O
D
0
CU
v
a
w
m
v
O
C
TO
L
LL_
C�
3
O
Z
Q
J
I
1--
d
LU
U
Z
CD
U
I
(
Lin
CU
I
LP
C7
0
CU
7
O
Cc
d
Q
D
O
-1
D = 19.08'02"
R = 365.00'
L = 121.89
T = 61.52'
LC = 121.33'
CD = N 09'38'47" E
D =
R = 65365 .0' 00'
L = 154.39'
T = 78.36'
LC = 153.24'
CD = N 12'02'17" W
Q /
\ `B?
64'12'48" W-
14.14
\ e \
\ S 89'42 54
Eua ,ax �1r usoaluM
ROGER GIENN MWAMS
VOL 11662 PAGE 1695 DRCTC
GLEN SCOTT HARWIL ET AL
VOL 12740 PACE 498
Sfo
OfCf�.gA Op`7 OONA PERRY7159EPACE 55 T UX TIIA
f
\ ` OIEGCAY P. WOOD9DE ET UX LYNN
VDI_ 11256 PACE 1973
\ W
SD
�Q MATT ET UX IOREA
VOL O. 8563 666J TTPACE 179t
a
/gg 95 S Sg TO
f7k'Ry� 0 7836 ` \ V O� /
N 00'22 03p\
50.44'
N 58.02'59" W
_ 42.15' fkezu
pRi(E 8 Wq Y)\ 9)
86'40, .. ... // Tp pR/(�- C
49ti + u /p
an I /
LOT 1
/
1OUNE-_ / rIREUNE
J
LOT 2 _. o TTTT2
�- ,VdD' EIA9W >PA¢
-24 FRO -VIE - - - - - -
®- - q 9 -®
w 71R783,- - - - S 89'44'56" W 332.75'
MVEWAY CHART
DRIVEWAY
TYPE
STACKNG
STACKING
VARIANCE REQUEST
SPACIC
VAfaATKI REQUEST
A
FULL
75
25'
367. 70 INTERSECTION
NOW
B
FULL
100'
NONE
43r TO INTERSECTION
6S
C
FULL
foo'
NONE
B TO C SPACING - 354'
146'
0
EXISTING RI/RC
NA
NA
C TO 0 SPACING - 33Y
NCHE
E
EXISTNC
I NA
NA
C TO E SPACING - 594'
NONE
A
ROGER GIENN W AMS
VOL 11862 PACE 1685 DRCTC
Lua un. eas"�mXlu�
1-_
vee.MWpy '„t4';
37.23' 5
T73'30"
27.377'
N 7) 4 j RNO ORANACE WAY _�"
0
N 4 5'55' W '9J)? W
19.84 N BS'37'S6" W
131.48'
LOT 7arAa of
BLOCKK 5 5 w.a vna wNMaAv,4
CORNERSTONE BUSINESS PARK
CAB. A AIDE XXX X
SITE DATA TABULATION
LOT 1
LOT 2
LOT 3
OVERALL
EXISTING ZONING
AO
AG
AG/Ol
AG/0'
PROPOSED ZONING
SP-2/C3 (UMITED)
SP-2/0 (LIMITED)
SP-2/C3 (LIMITED)
SP-2/C3 (LIMITED)
LAND USE DESIGNATION (LU.D.)
RETAIL COMMERCIAL
RETAIL COMMEROAL
RETAIL COMMERCIAL
RETAIL. CCMMERCAL
TOTAL LOT AREA
SZ225 SF
174,320
159,640
416,165 SF
TOTAL BUILDING AREA
14.490 SF
31.550 SF
16,400 SF
72.540 SF
PROPOSED USES
RETAL - 14,490 SF
RETAIL - 21.650 SF
RESTAURANT - 10.000 SF
(.0 SEATS)
RETAIL - 15.000 SF
RESTAURANT - 11,. SF
(35O SEATS)
RETAA. - 51.140 SF
NESTAURANT - 21.400 SF
(7,0 SEATS)
IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (ON -SITE)
60.179 SF (73.2X)
136.314 SF (76210
120.003 SF (75.2%)
316,496 SF (76.01G
EXCESS PARKWAY
2.942 SF
11.446 SF
2.679 SF
17,269 S'
IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (EFFECTIVE)
70.7%
714%
718%
71OX
REQUIRED PARKING
73 SPACES
21,650/200 ♦ 357/3
227 SPACES
1S,000/200 4 350/3 "
192 SPACES
51.140/200 4 710/3 -
492 SPACES
PROVIDED PARKING
73 SPACES
227 SPACES
192 SPACES
492 SPACES
GATEWAY PLAZA ADDITION
CAB. A SLIDE 5365 a 5366
taaa 17u1.
=. -1
00-51.51,
R R = 4.86
3p C L = 29.7
T = 14.89'
LC = 29.79'
337't CD = S 74'57'27" E
ORI� C TO n."v>:ass• 2s..
n, sr
')Rlvr_ 3,.00•
�l•�ARu 0 ...
1®
i=RELINE
N J93
8.4J.
CORNERSTONE PLAZA
USE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR "S-P-2" ZONING
PERMITTED USES
4tw.
0
0' 25' 50' 100' 150' 200'
GRAPHIC SCALE
'a Sao 1( . _-1 a.w1
LOCATION MAP
NOTES:
1. ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT.
2. ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS (NON -IMPERVIOUS AREAS) ARE SHOWN SHADED.
3. ALL DRIVES SHOWN HEREON ARE A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET IN WIDTH.
4. ALL PARKING STALLS SHOWN HEREON ARE 9' x 18' (EXCEPT FOR
ACCESSIBLE SPACES).
5. ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THIS TRACT IS CURRENTLY ZONED AC (AGRICULTURE).
ORI� �S77NC)
4000 BF, PROPOSED BUILDING
ONE STORY
RESTAURANT 0.488 9F.
T10 BEAT
This site shol permit all 'C-3' General Commercial District uses occording
to Zoning Ordinance No. 480. Section 22, with the exception of the following
deleted Uses:
1. Auditoriums• theaters and cinemas;
2. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory
thereto:
3. Lodges, sororities and / a fraternities;
4. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers.
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS:
This property shall be subject to the development regulations of the 'C-3"
Ceneral Commercial District. Section 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480. as
amended, and all other applicable regulations of Zoning Ordinance No. 480.
as amended. with the following exceptions:
1. Maximum impervious coverage required: 767Ec Provided: 78.5% on a
per lot basis, provided the overall site does not exceed 767k
2. Bufferyards along lot lines Internal to the development shall not be
required.
DRNE D TO DRIVE
EXUSTM RAMM ( -/
LOT 4 2alAn m- (.PEsaWn P,E nAx)
THOMAS FASTER HO. 474 qua Tu,s,wA
CAS. A ALOE 4123
CONCEPT PLAN
LOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK A
CORNERSTONE PLAZA
9.55 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS EASTER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
DECEMBER 2000
SCALE : 1"=50'
OWNER APPLICANT: CASE NO.
ZA 00-140
PAR-3 PROPERTIES, LLC
2810 MARKET LOOP SUITE 100
SOUTHLAKE. TEXAS 76092
TEL: 817-999-5336
FAX: 817-416-0024
CONTACT: MAX KRUGLER
Q
n �
M
d
(n rm
O r
C �
r
D L)
rn O
C
rn U
x
U
_0 n
O n Z
V
D O N /Arl
y=gvaN-4
IO O m D
MN Z
0 (n 0,0 z t
-<S � m (n
r' Z
rn�, MD
> M m pv
N (A
N S
94Z0-266 (6Z,M 'XVJ
1tOO-t66 (ZG6) 3NOHd
Z6O91 SV132 '39rlHL21OS
00/ NITS
IZOSL Sum 'SVTiYa
001 311n5
133&S 3ON311WOJ OBS
70M 'dnOND A1'Ir3N SA13W :83WO
OrON 111H 1S3AWH OIM
'DNI'M!O-SN3N1Nrd+AHnS:NOA3nSnS/a33NYJN3
Sfl-OOVZ 'ON 3SV0 A *
%Q" 1lOS 948'M
:HWO SfKKn3adnl
S3sn ZJ/M. Z-d-S
ONINaZ O35dONd
OI/Z-3
ONINOZ *ISM
Lf
(Jds 91) JS Oat/t
a3alA08d DNINWd
:01H O!ONNY4
WV1dOO ,u '8A DOI
/TVIJa3nnoD lWj 8
OS GfS 1
3sn aWl
'131 'OOlo
LIDS a19,9 Jr 615.1
V3VV 31JS
Za-(aS 101
%I 1Y 13S IZ59L
s3sn ZJ/M Z-d S
:N3AO) S0OV38dIll
DNINOZ a3SdOdd
OV/Z-0
ON2NOZ '15IX.3
DdS Y6
(OdS OZ) JS OOZ/t
a30VO8d DNrAWd
:038 DNL'Wd
Ntf-wool)lJ '8A 001
/,,V,MinWOD 1M13N
3w ONYI
1305 o,
Lf05 Z11.O9 OVOO'1
'V38,' "0018
V3W 3LIS
1a-1as 103
laVFiO AaIYlY1nS
I
'SJOON a3HJlld 31VN nw 3sn 1NranrlS38 3HL RI.M O3IVYJOSSV S31dOW3 3H1 (�
NVId 3H1 NO WOHS SV 36 nW. SOM 8344n8 lS311 V 3d11 (V
'133J 3WnJS COS '1 38 ll,•HS 1O1N151O SIH1
NI 3NnlJnN15 NO ONg11OB 31Vl13d35 V NOJ 3ZI5 11nlIV,IY/ 3Hl -V3W tlO0lJ (° �
:ONWOT1OJ 3H1 NOJ 1d3DX3 53ONYNIOUO 3l8VJnddV 83H10 OW SNOIIVVYJ3N i
AON33VnOV' IVUNN63M 3N1 'SNOLLVlnD3N 3NOZ AV18310 80OW803 3.
SNOLLV In33H Z-O 3H1 Ol LOWBrIS 38 nW ZN-I89 ONV I8-t— S101 (I
:SNOLL VI W38 1N312dDl3130
I IMSIO Z-D V NI 31VINdONddV IIVLM OW
SLNYNnr1S3N OOOJ 1SVJ OL O31IIIn 3W S3sn
'S35if-O�1fiH3d
AVMOOOV
'ar13S i
dYA ),UNION,
p
IVA pat
' k��l3y �; �y�j p��,lF�Qo t � � '�' � d�t�•'1.,,+'yz�•�,�Y %�°�z
�as�:3 r} ,ar: z sx\ a •! t: t 2`• f��
R y s s'
Fr e 9
- '; a , � r > °� <4 s pa� 'a a1 ,,°.a��'Y•.�e�a, °dt
• • • 1 >r �^ r '?, r >ag .far s �>< ist 4,44w'b
• �T"'s-��1k4t s jln �< a °ka`X'iss,,a�* a ,�as+'�, ory`I`s��s"a'�'a� ���'1•g`a•
'�� f'"�r � -la's<� E'' r x`' fi��Qasa.,' afy, ;€.>• n'a��+ia4g4�
c%`sk
�, i,>fys'
"u ?sY�i`' 1 � 3 s' 4 � p y �a.�it a„ `''.•��t'3,.�'JYYCS� 'y .
��.. Y'rz.f• F^p.�ra �1 i<',Fi (ye,.i 3•'a
>•ppp!Npi ( :.t 'i:,- --1 1s 4; R
ry.
v'^3
A,9�
u
Vki
3dVOS~ t
I
39,dra�,5 �21 'V 3dAt OWA
1
1. -1+1 P 00��1� - I1 I .I��.•
V 3d OWA
no .s-
f'-r'OOCIJna 311 OO,
� . sr �
4tZZ A1Nn00 L1V'diirA
m L J er,rs.tt N 3a0V zrsz
a3\ 1
3o ould<v3N /�\ ,, � � 'dam'•. II �R*' �
NIV1d00013 MA 001
/1VJ3d3WW00 7iVJ38
2Ji,' IdO00131J8V31 OU;
/ \tI
1
!1M083V72VC0 1IVJ-36
i Z.Stil£ -lSJ. V '8V'-1
�;31JNGO S.213,lidv f
I d- t-85 Aol
G.).01,43M
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
March 16, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-013
PROJECT: Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Country Estates
REQUEST: Nancy Squires is requesting approval of a rezoning to "RE" Residential Estate
District.
ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading of rezoning request.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(D)
Surrounding Property Owner Letters
(E)
Ordinance No. 480-358
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Case No.
ZA01-013
Agenda Item
8B
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Nancy Squires
PROPERTY SITUATION: 2001 Peytonville Avenue being on the east side of North Peytonville Avenue
approximately 750' south of West Dove Street.
HISTORY: There have been no recent development applications on this property.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Country Estates, being 6.8 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District
REQUESTED ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate District
P&Z ACTION: March 8, 2001; Approved (6-0).
P&Z SPEAKERS: None
STAFF COMMENTS: No plan approval is required with a request for "RE" Residential Estate
District.
NACommunity Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2001 cases\01-013Z.doc
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A
ZA01-013 8B Page 1
Vicinity Map
a Old Orchard Country Estates
Case No.
ZA01-013
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
101
W E
S
Agenda Item
8B
Attachment B
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Old Orchard Country Estates
Property Owner
Zonin2
Land Use Description
Acreage
1. A. Paradis
1. SF1-A
1. Low Density Residential
1.
3.31
2. J. Paxton
2. SF1-A
2. Low Density Residential
2.
5.06
3. T. Goza
3. SF1-A
3. Low Density Residential
3.
4.86
4. J. Smith
4. SF1-A
4. Low Density Residential
4.
7.27
5. A. Tummarello
5. SF 1-A
5. Low Density Residential
5.
0.98
6. J. Brewer
6. SF1-A
6. Low Density Residential
6.
1.08
7. P. Lemmel
7. SF1-A
7. Low Density Residential
7.
1.13
8. T. O'Connor
8. SF1-A
8. Low Density Residential
8.
1.02
9. R. Brugger
9. SF1-A
9. Low Density Residential
9.
1.08
10. R. Jones
10. SF1-A
10. Low Density Residential
10.
1.04
11. B. Wheeler
11. SF1-A
11. Low Density Residential
11.
1.23
12. J. Horn
12. SF1-A
12. Low Density Residential
12.
1.23
13. W. Reder
13. SF1-A
13. Low Density Residential
13.
1.01
14. W. Carlucci
14. SF1-A
14. Low Density Residential
14.
1.95
15. E. Dotson
15. SF1-A
15. Low Density Residential
15.
1.06
16. E. Dotson
16. SF1-A
16. Low Density Residential
16.
1.75
Case No.
ZA00-013
Agenda Item
8B
Attachment C
Page 1
`W
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Old Orchard Country Estates
NOTICES SENT: Sixteen
RESPONSES: Five responses were received from within the 200' notification
area:
• Mr. and Mrs. Timothy O'Connor, 1035 Brittany Ct., Southlake,
TX, in favor, "We have no objection to the proposed rezoning".
(Received March 1, 2001)
• John F. Paxton, 1055 W. Dove Rd., Southlake, TX, in favor, " I
may want to do the same thing some day". (Received March 1,
2001)
• Carol A. Tummarello, 940 Brittany Ct., Southlake, TX, in
favor. (Received March 1, 2001)
• Susan Jones, 1065 Brittany Ct., Southlake, TX, in favor.
(Received March 5, 2001)
• Patrick K. Lemmel, 1040 Brittany Ct., Southlake, TX, in favor,
"with the following concerns: (1) number of animals; (2)
proximity of structure to property line; (3) noise or odor
problems." (Received March 8, 2001)
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D
ZA01-013 8B Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.480-358
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A
ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF
LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT M, BLOCK 1, OLD
ORCHARD COUNTRY ESTATES, AND BEING
APPROXIMATELY 6.8 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF -
IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "RE"
RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS
ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC
INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND
THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY
FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE
OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF -IA" Single Family
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-013 8B Page 1
Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-013 8B Page 2
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,
are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Country Estates, and being approximately 6.8
acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF -IA" Single
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-013 8B Page 3
Family Residential District to "RE" Residential Estate District.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance
with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general
welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and
the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the
streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the
community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration
among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses
and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-013 8B Page 4
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued
violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under
such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-013 8B Page 5
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-013 8B Page 6
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E
ZA01-013 8B Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being Lot M, Block 1, Old Orchard Country Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in cabinet 388-118, page 41, plat records, Tarrant
County, Texas, and being approximately 6.8 acres.
Case No.
ZA01-013
Agenda Item
8B
Attachment E
Page 8
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
March 14, 2001
TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xl527)
SUBJECT: Designation of Timarron/Richards site for future Recreation Center
Action Requested: City Council consideration of Timarron/Richards property as site location
for proposed recreation center.
Background
Information: The SPDC Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for 2001-2003, includes
funding this fiscal year for design of a recreation center. To begin
design, a site must be chosen. A number of options, including purchasing
additional land, have been discussed and reviewed with Parks Board and
SPDC on different occasions. Landscape architects Schrickel, Rollins
and Associates were contracted to review the feasibility of a site on the
hill in Bicentennial Park, due to its topography and other features in that
area.
Staff presented a proposed site plan to SPIN # 10 residents for this
location at a meeting held on Wednesday, November 20. The
approximately 40 residents in attendance were adamantly opposed to the
development of the hill. The residents questioned the availability and
feasibility of the Timarron/Richards site.
After briefing the Parks Board at their December 11, 2000 meeting on the
outcome of the SPIN meeting, the Board also requested staff investigate
the Council's desire for use of the Timarron/Richards site.
This request was brought forth to Council at its January 16, 2001 meeting
to gain a sense of direction for the possibility of using the city's property
in this area for a Parks and Recreation use, more specifically, for a
potential Recreation Center. The Council was supportive of the idea and
directed staff to develop a possible concept plan, to include the recreation
center, existing senior activity center, and future library site.
Staff then met with the SPIN neighborhood on Monday, February 26,
2001 to present the plan. Residents were initially concerned and had many
questions and issues to discuss, however, they were receptive to the plan
and expressed satisfaction with staff s efforts. We stated that the next
step would be to gain Council approval designating the site as the location
for the recreation center in order for an architect to be contracted to begin
site planning and design of the facility.
Billy Campbell, City Manager
March 14, 2001
Page 2
The proposed concept plan offers many advantages:
(1) Provides senior activity center, recreation center and library on one
campus - like setting.
(2) Provides small "neighborhood park" setting for neighborhoods in the
area, complete with trails, picnic areas, pond, small pavilion, etc.
(3) Locates parking to the north of the site, away from homeowners, and
blocked by building structures, thereby minimizing light and noise
from parking area. Also takes advantage of possible reciprocal
parking agreements with office/retail to north of City property and
shared parking opportunities of the three facilities.
(4) Takes advantage of site topography to preserve trees to maximum
extent, locates recreation center farthest away from homeowners, and
minimizes visual height of the recreation center.
(5) Terminates Parkwood Drive south of Senior Activity Center, taking
all traffic destined for City facilities off Parkwood Drive and directing
it via driveway on northern edge of City property.
(6) Provides two ingress/egress points to property - right in/right out to
Southlake Boulevard, and full access off Byron Nelson Parkway.
(7) Proposed use for site is consistent with initial intentions for municipal
complex site.
(8) Provides extensive "bufferyard" between buildings and homes to
south of City property.
Site Data:
The site is located on the southwest corner of Byron Nelson Parkway and
F.M. 1709 (see attached location and boundary map).
• ACRES: 12.83 (including existing Senior Center)
• ZONING: "CS" Community Service District
• LAND USE PLAN: Public/Semi-Public
• UTILITIES: All available
• CURRENT USE: Vacant; existing Senior Center
• DETAILS OF PURCHASE: A three-way land swap which resulted in
the current configuration of property and the City's purchase of 14.77
acres for $1,140,400 ($1.77 per square foot average)
Recreation Center Characteristics / Site Needs:
• Enough land for roughly 30,000-40,000 sq. ft. building footprint,
with approximately 50,000 total (two -stories to accommodate
gym/multi-use courts) -- if "stand-alone" facility and allowing for
&W-2
Billy Campbell, City Manager
March 14, 2001
Page 3
building footprint, bufferyards, driveways, parking, and landscaping
= approximately 4.75 — 5.5 acres.
• Meet or exceed City's ordinance requirements (setbacks, bufferyards,
Corridor Overlay, Neighborhood Adjacency, drives, parking,
lighting, articulation, etc.)
• No land acquisition necessary
• Convenient location for majority of the population
• Minimal neighborhood opposition
• Minimal negative impact on traffic on adjacent streets
• Positive internal circulation
• Connectivity to the Trail System for non -motorized access
• Maximized tree preservation
• Enhanced landscaping
• Minimal site work
• Nearby utilities
• Prominence of building (visibility)
Financial
Considerations: Possible financial considerations regarding use of property:
(1) loss of use of this site for other general city purposes which may
require expenditures in the future for additional city property.
(2) funds may be necessary from SPDC's land acquisition budget to
reimburse the general fund for the use as park land.
(3) funds necessary to develop a "park" use on the site, whatever it may
be.
(4) lost income estimated up to $10 per square foot should the property
not be sold for an office or commercial use.
Citizen Input/
Board Review:
• The Planning Department met with area neighbors at their request on
August 2, 2000, to discuss the City's plans for this site or potential
uses.
• At their regular meeting on August 28, 2000, SPDC directed Kim
Wolfe, who spoke in Public Forum, to approach the Park Board with
her concerns about the Timarron-Richards site and ask for a
recommendation to Council.
• The Park Board generally discussed the issue at their regular meeting
on September 11, 2000, agreeing to consider this site in the overall
review of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, but
until a firm decision on its use had been made, not recommending any
specific park uses.
• Community Services staff presented a proposed concept plan for
recreation center, library and senior activity center to neighborhood
on February 26, 2001.
AM - 3
Billy Campbell, City Manager
March 14, 2001
Page 4
`..• • The Parks and Recreation Board will consider the site for
recommendation to City Council at its Monday, March 19, 2001
meeting.
Legal Review: N/A
Alternatives: Alternatives include:
• Recommending other potential sites be considered first.
Supporting
Documents: Supporting documents include:
• Proposed concept plan for Timarron/Richards site
• Digital aerial and boundary view of site
Staff
Recommendation: City Council approval designating the Timarron/Richards site as location
for proposed recreation center.
KH
A.5;9 - �/
I
L
Ol
Z
LL
O
H
x
a
� s
4
syN�
M
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
March 15, 2001
TO: Bruce Payne, Acting City Manager
FROM: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development
SUBJECT: Discussion of future revenues
Councilmember Standefer asked Billy if I could pull together some estimates of revenue from projects
that potentially could have developed recently. I have attempted to estimate these revenues as shown
on the attached spreadsheet.
It should be understood that these estimates are very rough and are intended for study or discussion
purposes only.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
GL
Enc: Spreadsheet estimating revenues from various projects.
11A-1
T
CD O O O O O O
O
N
CD O O O O O O
@
Y
4
c
r T r T T
W
Z
x
M
0 0 0 0 0 LO O
LO
2
O O Cn LO 0 Q) O
0)
W
O m
ti N CD Cn
co
Ur
T O r
O Cn MLO
Q
EFi 69 Efl ffl 69 Ef3 69 69 EA 69 ER
b}
C 0 0 0 0 0 C)
O
O O tf) 0 0 c) CD
Q
_
@
2
co N M N-zl- co N
69 EH e9 b9 69 69 ffi
t0
O O 0 0 0 0 O
Cn
00
ti
W
C V-
0 CD 0 0 CD C) 0
Z=
Z�
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C
V
n-
N M M M
Z
Z
@
O
C
a-
Ef3 Efl 69 69 69 CR Cfl
0)
CD CD O O O C:) C)Z
CD
F
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
C)
�
p
Cn (D C LO 0 LO V)
►Z
N
—
Cfl t- O t-- O F- t--
ea ba ffl
O O O O O O O
-0
0 0 0 0 0 0 O
Q
C
t- tl- O ti O N CD
L
Z
(0
J
T r T
69 6s 69 � ol� b9
O O O O O Cl) O
co
O O O CC) M O O
00
0)0
CD 0 tl- O O O
M
W
LD
O d r`
�
":I-
Z
_
N
'5
T N
Cn
co
p LL
d
N O O CO CD M co
CD t- O Cf) r- V T
N
c0
N
p
V) N t- M O M
T
CD
4
Z
@
N Cn M N-t M t
CD
J
0' N
T
N
C) C
0) O
Co Co O U E
E
C
O
CL Q U
O
a
C i 7 O C J
c/ 0 cz
U
Z
U
v = cn
Cr 0) m LT cc (U
C C C C c Y
C
O
p
O CD
N 0 U
N
U, ry
0 0 0 0 0C/)
E
)
U U U U O
C
O O O O Q
•� 0
00
_U
a� E
J
@ OC OO
m
4
O N
j U
2
m
O W Lj
C
O 0 L U
Q
Ln
C6
CO
> C) CU 'p
Z
U 0 2 W
O
N
C
O
E ai
E
O
O
U CO
c
O
E
t1
O
(V
N
p
W U
M,
N
(D 1- LO (D M LO L) I
M
N
CD I� N m N co m
0o
m
m
_
(B
M O CCT Li) N o r
CD
Co V) M N r C r
LO
r N
Efl Cfl 69 Efl 69 Efl 69 69 b9 bl? Cfi
E{i
LO M T LP) r r I I I I
O
p
O
Il r O N Cf O U7
O
p
M
(D r CO O LO M tT
1�
O) CD M r lfi LC)
Ln
CD
r N
CD
M O
J
t
�
�
C
69 cfi H3 Efl (fi 69 Hi Efl ER 69 EF}
bl?
O
p
LO
M LO LO M� r 0 I 1 I I
M r M <T LO "t
O
Q
2
>
O
y
CO
CO O N M Lf)
r
Q
X~
m�
C
c
L.6 � M N r"Izl C5
r N
M
U)
�
6?69 b9 e9lE»69b969(190969�b4
c
a^
Q
r CO N T r I I I I
Q
CD
Cl) O 0o N 'ct O
N
p
O
O
"t r N 00 T M N
C))
0
M N Lf) 00 C M
LI)
Z
O
O Cl) N r N M
�t
J
r r
co
69 69 69 09 b9 69 69 69 EA
69
I 1 1
O
CO r- O V T COlt
LD
o
O
M LIj� tiCl! ICO LC
Ln
O
"t r- LC) M r CO r
r
N
N M
00
J
Q
Efl Efi (19 Cfl Efl Efl ff) EA 69 Efl ER
H}
� O O (D O co co '
N
M O O D (D r M
O
O
N O O M I� M CO
LO
O
m LO N ti M M 'C
I-- m LO w 0 m tl-
L()
N
X O
ti I- M 00 'IT LO et
Cl)
(D >
L() T r r ti
D1
T
69br.* 69 6961-) US, 6961) Ell) (,P> U)
` O E
U
F� U (0 .�
C
a Q a co U
acnv0(Y
U�
Z
U
LT D7 O
C C C C Y
c
o
O
(n LO U, U, CD m
O O
E
@
U
o O aco
U U U U - o
O
O O O O
U Q
>
C
U U U U
CD
O L
U_
E
�
_
J
O OO
m
z
Y
U N
m
O W
Cn T
O L U
O � N
Q
�
(
(a
N
is
> O
Z
0
()
E
O_
O
a�
CO
O
U
_V)
O
N
O
U
c
co
0
ti
O
Izi-
N
U
'a
!n
O
U)
Z3
U
C
J> A-3
M
LC) N M m co tl- M '
ti
O
(D N CD m M m Il-
Lfi
M OJ N �Y
M LO
r
T
b9 (19) bl� �' 69 Efi
Ef}
m O O m m N LO " I
Cl)
p
O
ti r M m f- LO Co
r
o
co L
N O O N Co N m
LO
D
O O M Lr r r C5
N
O L_
-4
m
0
T
O
`
C
C
ER Efi Efl Efi E9 Efl Efl 69 E9 E9 64
ER
�
O
m CO CD LO O N '
O r-� t- LO r f-
LO
":I-
Z
>
0
Ocl�
OJ>1
LO O N M O N
m
m
�
CN CO N 't r T LO
CD
O
Ucot0
c
o
69 69 69 64 E9 EA Efl Efl EA ffi 64
69
�
C
Q
1— CD r !- LO N r
W
CDLO
N M LO N m N
LO
a
o
CDCD
m m m LO O
CD
I
O ❑
r N Ln � CD CD M
I�
CD
m
Cn
ti —
.- LO T N
N M
co
C
r
J
69 EA Efl EH Efl ffl Ef3 63 EA ER Cf?
64
Q
M ti CD tl- O N LO '
p
W
O
OO 0)
LN
m v I" Lf) ClO Cl!
N�
m N M CD N r t-
W
N
T co
CD
v�
p
� bs bl)� E9 H9 Ea E» 69 Efi E+9 (YD�
Efl
O O O O O Ln O 1 1
LO
O O O LO O N O
ti
O O O N O 1l- LO
of
O
O
O O O co Cl) Il- N
m
_
0
(D
M v m Lf) m CD '
a m N UC) � M m
r
m
Lll
x O
T N r O
co
F-
r N
co
N3 69 V9 69 69 613 Cfl Efl bci Efl EH
Eli
N
CT OO
U E
` U (0 E
c
aQ m U
0
aC/
C� @
U
Z
L)
�O
a) m tT mco a)
C
C
O
❑
(n LU) (Un fU, @
O
@
O O O aU)
a
U
o
O
C
O O O O o O
O C C
ll� 0 CO
Y E
h
o
J
CC p
m
Z
Y
L
N
m
U
O W Ln
O U L (�
@
U
co
C-
C
O U
U t6
W x
m U
M-4
N�LOOM LOM
N
r N CD O CD 'cT O
N
m
0) CD O CD O Lr �
a.
U
E
_
E
N LC) O Il- Co Ln U')Q
Q
D
O M T r M
r
T CN
Eli EH Y) 69 Eli Efl 69 Efl Efl 69 69
Eli
o
O
M O N O D7 N CD '
M
O
Cp
Mr T M Co
O
� p
M N N r Cp CD M
O
m
O L
N T N CZ)
O
k
O
C
Ef> (fl 69 69 El) Eli Efl Efl Efl Eli 69
E9
(U
N N M r I- M M 1 I 1 1
w
OLO
O CD !- r f- M O
I�
\
x
O (n I- CD Lf) O
N
a
m
N p
r N
�7
O
U
c
k
O
ER Eli b9 Eli Eli Eli Efi b9 b9 Hi 69
Eli
a
c
�l
Q
O
CD "t N M N r N 1
O
Q
O
Ln r-',I- r T M
co
Z
O
T Ln M r LC) N
M
O
N
m
O
U)
U) N (o r M 0
N
Cn
m
CA
f�
CD N r d
r
CD
N
Wk
r
Eli Efl Eli 69 Ef-? 69 U), Ef3 Ki 69 ba
EFT
a
O
O
T A N 1l- 0 (» N 1 I 1 1
CD T- O N ',7 N M
LO
O
O C)
M M 0 CD O M r
co
m
N m
Lr L(i r N r L()
T
m
i
NV
T M
O
k
Eli ff3 Eli 69 Eli e9 Eft ba Eli 69 Eli
EH
O O O O O O O 1 I 1 1
O
O O O O O N O
N
(U
O O O L() Lfi r O
r
2
�
co co
m
X
w
@
x �
CD C'N Cl) CD N M
-
O
M >
C7 r Cb
T
ER 69 EA El) E9 69 EH 69 69 EH Eli
69
U
min c
CM a) o
o E
U
F` U m -. E
c
c a- 'm O
Z
C)
U)
CT CT CD L7> (p N
C C C C Y
O
(n fn U, � CU co
0 0 U)
0.
U
0 0 a
UUUU �1_ O
O O O O a
O O C
U_
N
E
� r
-
O
CU
O O
M
W
CL
O N �
U
z
m
O W L
O U
O `
Q
�-
y
(6
(n
CB
.O
57
U
C
0
E
0-
_O
(U
(U
c
O
U (9
W x
o
a ai
N
-0 O
N C/)
CZ O
a
(U
d U
�-5
Ln
N 0 0 0 0 M 0 ' ' ' '
T
N
m O Ln Ln M to
N
O)
O Il- tl- 7 r- Ln
O
I
U
a CO
N C
Q
Q
tii
O
O O�
Q) T (.00 M CD Ln
N T N
N
Lf )
Q
N ~
T
N
bs E9 Eli Eli ({� Eli 69 b9 bl� 69 Eli
Efi
N
M O M M O Ln of
Ln
Z,
C
o
m O M M co M M
— Ln CD O w O (D
Ln
t`
O
O n
CJ (V CL Ln C LC N
T
Q
p
DLO
mLnTN TT
M
O L)
T Cl)
CD
x
Efl bS Y) E9 (fl 69 E9 b9 69 E9 Eli
Eii
M
M O Co Co O Ln Co '
Ln
~
>C
°
Mp
UmLnccoorn�00)i(DD
ti
Q
C
O C)
Ln
C6 N (D Ln O) Ln N
T
�
p
Q
c
Q
O (�
� Ln
T T N T M
O
W
J
(lJ 64 k s Eli E9 El) ba 69 (fl b9 E{i
ea
co
O O Ln Ln O O Ln '
T
O O tl- t` N tl- tl
T
a
C''M O M N� N N
Ln
Li
m
c LL
O Ln M T M T Ln
M
Q
p
T C
CD O Cl) Ln T Cl) N
M CD
CD
N
C
O
69 E9 (li E9 Elk b9 69 Eli (lD (3i Eli
69
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O Ln O
Ln
O O Ln LIB O (n LIi
O
O
(1)
t- r- N CD t-
co O co b t-- Co N
T
Ln
Q
0
(C Ln M T O T Ln
M
Q
X M
m O M Lo T M N
CD
M cf)
M T CD
N
F-
T
El> (li E9 69 Eli efi (li Efl b9 69 (fJ
(li
r� C
ID O O
O
Co U
L U M - E
c
C a-= O
O
acn
aQ
v0 o
-
�
c c c N Y
C
O
0 V0i N N O co
o o 0 o aCO
n
U U U U o
O
Q�
=
C
O O O o Y n
U U U U
>
C)
O •U O
_ — _ O C 0
U
O
Y `-
F_
_
O
J
0
D O
m
2
Y
U N
-
�]
o LJ (rj
C/) V- T
O L U
a CZ
Q
C
M
M
> o
s
c
(v
E
0-
0
a>
CD
0
c
O
U M
Ld x
a C)
O �
T y
D O
(U C/)
(D 0
n
C) _
� U
11A-�
t-
�
1
N tf) r` CD � N Lr
Q
@
00 N r
00
J
�
p
Ef3 ffi E!-? 69 f9 69 blT ffi e9 ffi ffi
fi?
N 0 0 0 0 0 0
t
O
Z
O O Cf') U-) m Cf)
N
Q
r• O P- r` 'ct t` Uf)
O
J
Q
N
O
N O CD m CT)m O
0)r CO O C'') CD
r`
Q
(6
ti N N
LO
'
ii
c
r
N
W
Z696969
t& Efl 69 ff36969 ffi H9
ER
uj
r N ti O N N
t�
W
(6
CD r O N cY N N
Cl) CO LO CD O CO r
LC)
co
c-`
U) lf) r CV r LC7
r C)
r
CD
Q
O
°
a
W
Y
H9 ffi e9 69 Efl fig H9 ffi 69 es Efl
bq
Jm
r` CD r` O N LO' I
O
T
N O Lf) CD N LO Cf)
't
O rt r• LO O LO O
N
-7
�?
m a)
m N C,CD N r ti
V
cD
p
Q
a) a-
fi r 00
co
o c
LL
m
p
E{j 69 b9 E9 69 09 E9 ffl fig 69 H?
69.
{�
O LO d U') N d
T
C1� t- O ";:r r W "t
C� CD L'
LO
Q
a) 0- O
N m
of
O j
d
ffi (fl b9 69 Ef3 ffl UBI 69 EA (19 Efi
69
N
C) (� c
m " N 0
` O U
F- U CO E
c
ol ` c a--m O
0- U
g
0-
m c
U) v 0 C�
U
Z
U
cn
II� m O CT co O
c c c c Y
m
c
°
°
'� _N 'm .— cts
0 0 o o Q
0
0
O
�=
O O O O Y En
a
C
U_ U U U U
p
O O L
0� 0 CO
U
° E
C
L O O
m
CL
Z
Y
O N
� U
m
W Lj
/O-�
VJ r ..
O
L U
f-
cn
a- U
KI-00 VZ
3w Y tMMM t vwe
ft,y
tawr0 � Mtsa1.. t1Mt
rr a � w.'tam�����r� x
M A1MI1 tR3. w �.
b r HM R r rti~1 M t1t�MA/ d=
Y 7.YtO�M3Yt A.R aA wM
031VO 30r1S — 13M V3 NI 031U 1V1d Sstl
00-II-W
S3WV Zt" 37V311.7Y SSOMo
SVX31 'ALW= 1NVMMVI
'3MVvwm !0 A10 3H1 Ol NOW00V NY
90i"Wr 6680019 MCI" *A'0
61-91 Sd07
9NUMOHS LVId
DrIWH AwAM
A AMC —7U DU NO 3XAJO A WX OIW O k" AN IOOM /ONO roWOM
MOLALL NOIMWW= ON MOMW NIL VOA 3W A 311 OUnMM 31 X*U 30 O 0300711000V ON
VICIP 111ti0 MOOMW ON 3+aY 3u m 0 acM a 311111,11 mm wasm 3W 3 01 3" 0t "moo MM
♦d000 moolve l ON NON rrvl 03W3dN ATMC611113d Av0 StNl 10 'AtMMlM 03NDMX f1 31LL '3R 3MDA5
111101101010. A wtW100
WAM A 71Mi
mm WON
MM RK
1000 A SOU VOU 'AIM= LIMONI lY OWN AM SS7MM
A AM ----All i111 MO 37tU0 A ll3t 0M/ 11OM .tN IOOM IOK7 1®Ildlp
MI03m MOLLMOOIOCO 01N 3wdww 3111 71lo 3 3S M OUrma 31 mu 3N 01 030071AO m aN
LD1r1ua1 01f0o7S01 ON wm 3u 01 030M0 ! 3M1 77Os MOSIOd 31A M Ol 3m
o< Mu00 MKW YM
OOMA ON YL1311 VWM WAWA 03OVWW AT11CY3d p0 MU NO 'ALMMM UNCR11dM1 >u '3M MAM
DIVISION, A
SMO, AA 31Mf
t0N3R YI.1 cow
MWI WAM M.160131
IOo A "(1-3u SOU 'MM °$M= WINSI S r OMW AN 99MM
A AO ----PNI SNl W ZYJA A W39 ON OMW All 1WM MHO 1ESS AG
NGMi11 MOIMCMM O3SO N .WW 3M VW 3WA 31U OU=G 341M/I 30 OOW1 G3M7VMX=N O
1I.111WOM OSD=W OW 3WN 31u 01 m00DYIR i 3M t�M r 3LL M 0l 31 Ol NAOp
'90NN3W 37MYLSM07 03111OddY ATM1CY7d AO MU NO AL10U1N O1N06S OM 3FU '311 3110d3V
111RYl10 A Allflm
CAM A ]VMS
DOMCR 3]1N7L00
IM9 A MO —Nu Mu WAX 'A1WCO LIIWM IV OWN AM M3k=
91MV ArC01
A AMl �Nl WILL NO NO 3OA WX CW OMt AM MGOMM M3A10 '0'>DII7�Li
MOi31t M0U%WMM ON MATW NU Wl1 3MYS 3lU OXnM* 3, 1MO. 3" a< 030071Ao0DY awY
LOr=17i0 OIOOOMM OW3MW 3u m 0® 30011! ! 31WM 3SCM MOaad 311A m 311 m $MOW
'SOME= VT 03N3dN AT1M10Yy AM WU NO At=OWN aROSK OM 31U 71 300d31
LIImM A AIWOO
SMUI A 3IYIS
SONIOSS In
IGOC A AM----JQ SOU 'SMUT ALMOO 1MMSIM 1Y OWN M SiiMp
l41331113u MOOR SU[MOW OMI/ AM A ZLNM 3u 31n S.7rIWW 3N1
al 31=30 AM3N 00 3A ON fg01 'ALI1m LNANl 'JXVMW A AW 3u Ol MOLIUM MY
IKUMY M roM LO00 Yro Y1-11 slot w AOOdOU 0�0 3tOrAl3W 3N1 ONLONMM JYN
SOU LADY A97DW 00 'YO1MO 710t 3u ORM TAN *am vanes com M1N IW= ON
WM Y1r OOM ON MIOM OMo wMRMO YOMm= 33MMSN00 ON fOrMD= 'fT '31 1MU
4IL11001d 21MU AS M31 TN S M 70IONIONA SI M
AM VMdl A 53M 140Y OMPOn M OMY O=OMa3S A 1NOd 3N1 OI OIMT310r 3MI/W00S 7
WMI MM iu OCN O/SSilO:1 OIN 131d K7W AM SO M It SUfM It SINCA is 1W
iOAIDO VW OWIQI IMXWV 11 AM10N Y 0l GYr173M
'3 A 30 W" N111G5 )W SaW LIM IVW ANG ID107311 K 53LM1 A SDOM K HU
Won 17Mt1 A IUI=W O
WY 011O1TY1p0 31YM1Lp 7 A 7W1 'Aro7 Now IOU W Iowa,Wd 11M 03800 V 0t 3M
OIY[ A 3M1 'AIIII lOO 1LL Og7I 1331 .t90 ISiI 10073 SR a11M SO 13 MM30 00 IIIM
OQ1dMW 1dA}MW 3M "MW A Al2 '1 1001
A t3MCO 1S3MMOM 31u ' M a.. U W on 'Q3011 M MM 1�1 A IOIs1D7 lOM1UIl0i 3
OOOMMMN A 3u1 'Aror 15Y1 3Nl W A3S I" I M PM4 V Ot R31d11O7 '%%MDN 11 33W*UnOS A ,
1 101 OM A 3f1 HIM%>LL OIOW LM OVt0! IMS SOINIM S o 53u0w 0 333MM W KV
LMU A n11D3 lwtx m 3Nt IOU'ram 'ALd100 LOOM M Isomm 1 ffw Vtn 3" Y J3.M
nM a twt3nOM JWDUIFa 77 A 3M 'Atly KOM 3u M OMIO/ tRM NW MOW U3dM V It 7MC30
""'Wr ! W 031oom
AWWOUOM1 311011 ON VIAL 'A1WO3 LNOrO VOMMOMP =0 '09 32M UM 31rf10t ON IS01 "m 'tout
3MIDA 10 a3down mm O OmD>71I svxu 'A mw L.M=M YM 91 171M1WI 'AV@M MOM 'A Q 311 NI
a:uwus own A 1Ttl1 Y A 03M0 MS 3I OMt3! 11N vAm mulaw OIN MSN IMvr Om
YLON Y1A 001M 01N YL13M iNMp MMRmI llOOMgI l7M>a1PJ OMY SOIMW 'AT 71 smam
Ult=YM A AM=
SYmI A 31Mi
:AIIY TSMI Alm
70fYN
aL1
ICIEVO AIC W M 03+awN
:ArI13113iS I'd
a1Y111Mm
-AM
M<>MOOp Space tS now" 30 JO 031014N
AID 311 KM 3XAVA 7Y R [TIOM M MM MUM TRIPS MM W0 i. AMM �0
OWS301L/1 A MWM MIDOMY l3W/ 0I L' 3fWS 2 01N'J3WM M AIDAI Wrl IMi
A MMM M V r 1WM OIN SIM AG MOttaI MU IMIr AI AMY A NOIAOd V OOTUS 4
NomliMM/ mm OC Im"m A OSM am 1r01s 3SOIA w. a 10M0 %W 1N101m70MbaffuC
at 17311R 30 AM ON OIU = lw 31i1 3N4 3u n 7MYA1N MOUY1110A1 LOWM7 1SO1
3N1 MMV AANMON0 IR MS 2011 AGD ill I 430111
'171Yd
m
xnaw
p
I =m It an
!
1Iw 3Mi r to —
_ _ _ m •1 — _ _ _ orlon Ay�.s+eas =•i_ —
— —. � — — �3 CO'9Yt__ — — — 9PGtl — — — — — OL'a►l �,� OS'Ltl
ill
I
I
.,cr
I
sll
11
%M Won m H '1z 00011115. '?
'1S OO'VK'S.
'171Yd '171Ya
0
43
�ai at
{it 101 a g ct Vol m
o lr * a
al 101
I
8
I.OS 3O1K Y IM
Rl 1t RMltgwt�R1
Ci I
I
~ =
g
5 D
IOurmn X27111 ,&
SSa 8h86
22
I
I
�
ii
II
I
imam
Atc �i�
>n Ad
.
6C999 3�t[,IZ�aN
wo-d 310VR1Wt
(60L l 'ON -AMH W.4) R
• Yy,q qU
-
•
atlVAMWEII 3XflKLnos `3
_
uwv •r d
--------_--
I ,•a .sr T--
c rod Ftil1Yioc "wit c rod fiii wdc �w •i71Yo 71Ye \
atm l� ND ama� t� Mo q�c tfuN •0d {IOt
I S31.M 3130,11=Y11C7 O
I I
171Y0
GIG rod 'tout lot
3WUKK tMd' SOLI
•171Yd
M rod YMNO 'IGIt
l0-[l-ZO
:L[-0) Slat-00
4a'Lto L4
It laL S1gC31 'F{1MOII IMO1
3M VWM-kAs •N =I
sldtl -W VIOOH '9 53lMvin
•OM V 1.311WIS Z441yyB OAOI
%01.Wns
+•s*vgWL19
+coat S1nr31 p,"m
SC[ '1►K 'AWI 3NI1L�dyytJ OOS
S7LNOMM V NNOI&**60
:W3MON3
6L*M6•Lla
SM3w" ssokm om
SNIDGM 03
�LN3=3� M3NM0
Z6t6—L9oat SVM %RKM 3 UVA
OVOM 15IND L9w
"0101M 3ONYLSN00
saavH7ro 'At •r
si111•0991 to
Rim SV1t31 'KLma acm
VOL NOSINNnS 006Z
4, 31YLS3 WA MYIs
:SM3PU10
'171Td
'lNt 70R Y 111p 110O100Y
I 13lu 'It IDpM T 103 A 3M7
S111 3111 MO MI= 10101107 OW11
so&
,019 s „1 smaS
091 001. 09 0 09