2001-09-18 CC PacketCity of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
September 18, 2001
To: Billy Campbell, City Manager
From: Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, 481-2308
Subject: Award of bid to Brett Construction Co. of Hico, Texas for the construction of
sanitary sewer improvements in the Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill Estates,
Shadow Creek, and Trail Creek Additions, and force main construction
along Bank Street.
Action Requested: Award of bid to Brett Construction co. of Hico, Texas for the construction
of sanitary sewer improvements in the Hunter's Ridge, Randol Mill
Estates, Shadow Creek, and Trail Creek Additions, and force main
construction along Bank Street.
Background
Information: The council approved the installation of sanitary sewer systems in the
above mentioned subdivisions as part of the FY 99/00 and FY 00/01
Capital Improvement Programs (CIP). The project involves providing
sanitary sewer service to the residents in these subdivisions, as well as
installing a force sewer main along Bank Street that will eliminate an
existing single stage treatment plant to the south.
The contract time for completion of the work is 210 calendar days.
Five bids were received on June 20, 2001, with Brett Construction
Company being the low bidder. The bids have been reviewed by
Cheatham & Associates and City Staff, and are tabulated as follows:
Bidder
Brett Construction Co.
Mid -State Utilities
J. S. Constructors
Mid -Continent Excavation
Saber Development Corp.
Bid Amount
$ 806,161.00
$931,950.40
$1,035,739.75
$1,051,323.00
$1,433,304.00
Financial
Consideration: The bid amount is within the budget for this project when combined with
additional funds as follows:
• Hunter's Ridge Sewer FY 99/00 CIP, ($173,459.50 is available, staff
recommends use of $173,459.50)
• Randol Mill Estates Sewer, FY 98/99 & 99/00 CIP, ($260,959.50 is
available, staff recommends use of $260,959.50)
• Shadow Creek Sewer, FY 98/99 & 00/01 CIP, ($82,800.00 available,
staff recommends use of $82,800.00)
• Trail Creek Sewer, FY 98/99 & 00/01 CIP, ($97,800.00 available, staff
recommends use of $97,800.00)
• S-7 Sewer, FY 98/99 & 99/00 CIP, ($410,909.19 available, staff
recommends use of $48,524.00; this represents the amount for the
Bank Street Force Main)
• Oak Lane Water, FY 00/01, ($82,907.78 available, staff recommends
use of $82,907.78)
• Southlake Park Water Improvements, FY 00/01, (515,000 available,
staff recommends use of $140,326.22)
The total amount of the above referenced funds is $886,777.00, which
provides for the construction contract amount plus a 10% contingency
fund for use in unforeseen circumstances.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: The neighborhood sewer projects were selected based upon favorable
responses to a citywide survey. In addition, Staff held a spin meeting for
the project on August 20, 2001 to answer questions and discuss the nature
of the project with the residents, as well as to describe the level of
invasiveness that this type of project inherently brings.
Legal Review: None.
Alternatives: The Council may award or reject this bid.
Supporting
Documents: Project Information
Vicinity Maps
Project Schedule: The contractor is required to begin the project within ten (10) calendar
days of the notice to proceed, and complete the project within two -hundred
and ten (210) calendar days.
2
Staff
Recommendation: Please place on the City Council agenda for September 18, 2001 for
Council consideration and approval. Staff recommends that the bid be
awarded to Brett Construction Company in the amount of $806,161.00 and
an additional $80,616.00 be approved for project contingencies for a total
amount of $886,777.00
Staff
Contact: Mike Hutchison, E.I.T., Senior Civil Engineer, 481-2361
Charlie Thomas, P.E., City Engineer, 481-2175
Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, 481-2308
CC: David Fleming, P.E., Construction Manager
Mike Patterson, Operations Manager
Valerie Bradley, Assistant to the Public Works Director
PF/mh
3
PROJECT
PARCELS SERVED
PROJECT SIZE (FEET)
BID PRICE
SHADOW CREEK
5
845
$ 134,320.00
TRAIL CREEK
14
1-108
$ 130,059.00
RANDOL MILL ESTATES
20
2624
$ 261,613.00
HUNTER'S RIDGE
19
2230
$ 231,645.00
BANK STREET FORCE MAIN
n/a
1710
$ 48,524.00
FATAL 58 8517 $ 806,161.00
MEMORANDUM
September 14, 2001
TO: City Manager Billy Campbell
FROM: City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand
SUBJECT: Contract for Election Services with Tarrant County Elections
Administration and City of Southlake Local Option Election
Requested Action: Consider approving a contract for Election Services with Tarrant
County Elections Administration and City of Southlake Local
Option Election.
Background: According to the Alcoholic Beverage Code, the Governing Body
(City of Southlake) shall, at its sole cost and expense, perform all
functions related to the November 6, 2001, local option election.
The City proposes to enter into a contract with Tarrant County to
perform the duty of verifying and checking the petitions submitted
to the City of Southlake for Local Option Election to ascertain the
number of qualified voters signing petitions that do or do not meet
requirements of Chapter 251 of the Alcoholic Beverage Code.
Pursuant to the estimates provided by Tarrant County Elections
Administrator, the city will pay Tarrant County $50.00 per hour for
the verification services. Tarrant County estimates that the services
will take 40 hours to perform, for an estimated cost to the City of
$2,000.00
Based on the small staff in the City Secretary's office, this is the
only service where the City Secretary feels assistance is needed.
Financial
Consideration: If approved, the contract will be a cost of $2,000.00 to the City.
Legal Review: Betsy Elam, City Attorney, wrote this contract
Supporting
Document: Contract between the City of Southlake and Tarrant County
Elections Administrator.
Action Required: Approval of the contract for election services with Tarrant County
Elections Administration and the City of Southlake Local Option
Election.
CONTRACT FOR ELECTION SERVICES WITH TARRANT COUNTY
ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATION AND
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE LOCAL OPTION ELECTION
THIS CONTRACT made this day of , 2001, by and
between City of Southlake, acting by and through the governing body of hereinafter
referred to as "Governing Body", and Robert Parten, Elections Administrator of Tarrant
County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "Contracting Officer", and by authority of
Section 31.092(a), Texas Election Code, for the matters related to the Local Option
Election expected to be held on November 6, 2001.
DUTIES AND SERVICES OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
The Contracting Officer shall be responsible for performing the following duties
and shall furnish the following services and equipment.
(a) Verify and check the petitions submitted to the City of Southlake for Local
Option Election to ascertain the number of qualified voters signing
petition that meet the requirements of Chapter 251 of the Alcoholic
Beverage Code.
(b) Certify in writing to the City Secretary of the City of Southlake the
number of qualified voters signing the petition.
DUTIES AND SERVICES OF GOVERNING BODY
The Governing Body shall, at its sole cost and expense, perform all other
functions related to the November 6, 2001, local option election, and pay Tarrant County
$50.00/per hour for the verification services. The parties estimate that the services will
take 40 hours to perform.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
(a) Nothing contained in this contract shall authorize or permit a change in:
(1) the officer with whom or the place at which any document or record
relating to the election is to be filed; (2) the place at which any function is
to be carried out; (3) the officers who will prepare the official canvass of
the election returns; (4) the officer who will serve as custodian of the
voted ballots or other election records; or (5) any other nontransferable
functions specified by Section 31.096 of the Texas Election Code.
(b) The Contracting Officer is the agent of the governing body for the
purposes of contracting with third parties, with respect to the election
expenses within the scope of the Contracting Officer's duties; and the
Contracting Officer is not liable for the governing body's failure to pay a
claim.
(c) The Contracting Officer shall file copies of this Contract with the County
Judge and the County Auditor of Tarrant County, Texas.
PAYMENT FOR SERVICES
(a) Only the actual expenses directly attributable to the Contract may be
charged, plus an administrative fee of 10% of such actual costs. (Section
31.100(b), Texas Election Code).
(b) As partial payment of the Contract estimate of $2,000.00 (Two Thousand
Dollars), the Governing Body shall pay to Tarrant County the sum of
$ , at the time the contract is executed and the election is
called.
The balance for such services shall be paid within thirty (30) days from
receipt of final billing.
In the event said election is not held, the Governing Body shall reimburse
the County for any expenses incurred as of that date.
WITNESS the following signatures and seal:
By:
By:
Billy Campbell, City Manager
City of Southlake, Texas
Robert Parten, Elections Administrator
Tarrant County, Texas
NACity Secretary\Elections\Local Option Election\tarrantcountycontract.doc
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager
FROM: Gary Gregg, Technical Services Manager
SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Purchase 76 Licenses for OfficeXP
Action Requested: City Council approval of purchase from Texas Department of Information
Resources (DIR) of seventy six (76) licenses for Office XP.
Background
Information: The City will soon receive seventy six new desktop computers that City
Council previously authorized. The purchased computers ship with various
utilities and an operating system but do not contain any productivity suites
containing any word processing, spreadsheet or presentation capabilities.
Texas DIR has arranged an enterprise agreement with Microsoft through
Software House International (SHI) that enables state and local governments to
purchase Microsoft products at the lowest possible pricing based. We have
budgeted in the mid -year request for these copies of Office XP and are within
budgeted amounts.
Financial
Considerations: The recommended proposal is for a total of $16,948.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: Not subject to any board review.
Legal Review: No review necessary, purchase made within State bid cooperative purchasing.
City Council approval necessary due to amount of purchase.
Alternatives: Forego purchase until City Council would direct otherwise.
Supporting
Documents: Attached proposal.
Staff
Recommendation: Place this item authorizing the City Manager to purchase 76 licenses of Office
XP from SHI on the September 18, 2001 City Council meeting agenda for
consideration.
Quote Details
Quote Number: 21136
(16 note Name..: Office XP
reated.....: 9/10/01 5:41:30 PM
Address.....: 1400 MAIN ST., STE 440
City........: SOUTHLAKE
State.......: TX
Zip.........: 76092
Country.....:
Email.......: ggregg@ci.southlake.tx.us
The following items are in your quote:
Item 1
Web Catalog ID: 1518470
ProductName ... : Office Professional XP for 32-Bit Windows Enterprise English Version Upgrade -
License Only
Quantity......: 76
Unit Price....: $223.00
Extended Price: $16,948.00
Total: $16,948.00
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
September 12, 2001
TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xt. 1527)
SUBJECT: Termination of the Interlocal Agreement for Library Services with the City
of Grapevine
Action Requested: Termination of the Interlocal Agreement for Library Services with the
City of Grapevine.
Background
Information: The City of Southlake began contributing to the Grapevine Library in
1991 when Southlake entered into an interlocal agreement to contribute
an annual sum to the library system for the purchase of books.
Approximately $72,000 was contributed for the purchase of 4,100 items
over the next seven years.
In 1998, the City of Grapevine revised their contribution requirements
and implemented a.new fee structure of $25 per each library card issued
for non-residents. The consensus among City Council at the time was to
continue to participate in the Grapevine Library System until such time
as a Southlake library was established. On October 5, 1999, the City
Council authorized entering into the existing agreement with the City of
Grapevine for the provision of library services at a continued rate of $25
per each library card issued. The agreement was structured for a one
year period with automatic annual renewals unless either party notified
the other party of their intent to terminate no less than thirty days prior
to the end of the current term. The current term ends October 19, 2001.
Should the City Council approve the termination of the agreement,
Southlake residents would still have the opportunity to use the Grapevine
Library through their own purchase of a non-resident library card.
At its August 21, 2001 meeting, staff discussed with City Council the
requirement for a library security system and the types of systems
available. Staff recommended the purchase of the Checkpoint Radio
Frequency (RFID) system since it is compatible with the Grapevine
Library and technologically advanced, resulting in greater efficiency of
staff time. The drawback is that the system is significantly more
expensive ($64,000) than the type of system originally anticipated and
budgeted for ($13,000). As a result, one option for funding the RFID
system discussed with Council at the time was to discontinue the
purchase of Grapevine Library cards for Southlake residents (budgeted in
fiscal year 2001-02 at $60,000) and instead use this funding towards the
purchase of the RFID system.
}
Billy Campbell, City Manager
September 12, 2001
Page 2
Financial
Considerations: Funding in the amount of $60,000 has been allocated in the fiscal year
2001-02 proposed library budget for library services with the City of
Grapevine. It is recommended that this funding be re -allocated towards
the purchase and installation of the RFID library security system as
previously discussed with the City Council (additional capital purchase of
$64,000).
Citizen Input/
Board Review: In light of the new City library scheduled to open this year, the Library
Board reviewed and recommended during their May 23, 2001 budget
meeting, the discontinuation of contracted library services with the City
of Grapevine for fiscal year 2001-02.
The City Council approved (6-0) on consent agenda at their August 21,
2001 meeting, the purchase of the RFID library security system.
City staff has been in contact with officials from the City of Grapevine
regarding the possibility of termination of the interlocal agreement.
Legal Review: Not applicable.
Alternatives: - Continue the provision of library service for Southlake residents
as provided through the current agreement with the City of
Grapevine.
Supporting
Documents: - Copy of the interlocal agreement.
Staff
Recommendation: City Council approval to terminate the Interlocal Agreement for Library
Services with the City of Grapevine and reallocate the funding for the
purchase and installation of the library RFID security system.
r
Lq
INTERLOCAL A( REEi 1ENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES
WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the parties herein find the following
Interlocal Agreement (the "Agreement") to be in the best interests of the citizens they
serve; and
WHEREAS, Article 3, Section 64 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 791 of
the Texas Government Code authorize -ities in the State of Texas to contract with one
another for the performance of various governmental functions and services, including
those in the area of public libraries; and
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake and the City of Grapevine pursuant to the
Constitution and the lativs of the State of "Texas desire to make and enter into a contract
whereby the City of Grapevine, Texas will make available to the City of Southlake,
Texas, library services for the education, recreational and informational needs of its
residents; and
herein,
WHEREAS, each party is authorized to perform the services contemplated
NOW, THEREFORE, know- all men by these presents:
In consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth herein,
the City of Southlake, a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County, Texas,
("Southlake") and the City of Grapevine, a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant
County, Texas ("Grapevine") do hereby covenant and agree as follows:
1.1 That all matters stated in the preamble are found to be true and correct
and are incorporated with the body of this Agreement as if copied in their entirety.
1.2 Until termination of this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of
Paragraph 2.1 hereof, Grapevine shall make its public library facilities available (the
"Grapevine Public Library") to the citizens of Southlake on the same basis as the,
citizens of the City of Grapevine in exchange for the compensation defined in Section
1.3. All rules, procedures and fines will apply equally to the residents of Southlake and
Grapevine.
Page I
0
1.3 The City of Southlake shall pay to the City of Grapevine $25.00 for each
library card issued to a resident of Southlake, limited to one per family, and allowin
g
for multiple users within the family. The City of Southlake shall make this payment
from current revenues available to the City.
TERM
2.1 The Agreement shall last for a period of one (1) year from the date of
execution hereof. The Agreement will automatically renew for additional one year
terms unless either party gives written notice to the other party of its intent to terminate
the Agreement not less than thirty (30) days prior to the end of the then current term.
2.2 Upon termination of the Agreement, Grapevine shall transfer to Southlake
all books purchased by Grapevine on behalf of the City of Southlake pursuant to previous
agreements.
MISCELLANEOUS
3.1 The Agreement may be amended only by mutual agreement of the parties
in writing.
3.2 It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of the
Agreement, no party waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or
defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of
governmental powers and functions.
3.3 The Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts and shall be
binding on each city when duly authorized by the governing body of each City and
executed by each City's duly authorized representative.
3.4 This Agreement contains all of the agreements made by and between the
parties hereto.
3.5 In case any one or more of the terms, sentences, paragraphs, or provision$:
contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or
unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall. not
affect any other term, sentence, paragraph or provision hereof, and this Agreement shall
be constructed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been
contained herein.
Page 2
3.6 Any notice provided herein shall be given in writing and delivered or
mailed by certified or registered United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as
follows:
IF TO GRAPEVINE:
City of Grapevine
Attn: City Manager
413 Main Street
Grapevine, Texas 76051
IF TO SOUTHLAKE:
City of Southlake
Attn: City Manager
1725 E. Southlake Boulevard
Southlake, Texas 76092
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement to;'
be effective upon execution and dating by each City.
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE,
TEXAS ON
BY: _� -- —
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM D. TA`I'E,
MAYOR
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM. -
City Attorney, City of Grapevine,
Texas
0
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SOUTIILAKE,
TEXAS ON
ITIE HONORABLE RICK STACY,
MAYOR
Date: LAW if I
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, City of Southlake,
Texas
Page 3
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
September 14, 2001
TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager
FROM: John Eaglen, Assistant to the City Manager (481-1433)
SUBJECT: Recognition Policy for Members of City Boards, Committees, and Commissions
Action Requested: City Council approval of Recognition Policy for Members of City Boards,
Committees and Commissions.
Background
Information: Staff has worked on a draft of this policy in order to provide guidelines for
the effective and equitable recognition of the hard work and value that citizen
volunteers bring towards shaping efficient and effective service delivery.
The features of the policy include the following:
■ Providing that all appointed members in Good Standing of City Boards,
Committees, Ad hoc Committees, and Commissions are recognized at the
completion of their term(s);
■ Establishing protocol for recognition standards, including classification of
recognition plaques based upon the additional time commitments of
serving in an Executive function, and providing accountability for
coordinating preparation activities for member recognition.
Examples of the plaque classifications are provided in Exhibits "A" and `B",
including dimensions and a cost estimate for each classification.
Financial
Considerations: The classification of plaques provides a variable cost on a per -unit basis. The
standard plaque is estimated at $38.25 per unit, and the Executive Officer
Plaque is estimated at $78.00 per unit. Funding for these awards is currently
provided in the City Secretary's operating budget.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: At this time there has been no public review of the draft policy.
Legal Review: Not Applicable.
Alternatives: Input towards the policy as desired.
Supporting
Documents: Supporting documents include the following items:
■ Copy of the draft Recognition Policy for Members of City Boards,
Committees, and Commissions (including Exhibits "A" and "B").
Staff
Recommendation: Place as an item on the September 18, 2001 City Council Agenda to approve
the Recognition Policy for City Boards, Committees, and Commissions.
City of Southlake
Policies and Procedures
IN
Policy:.
Approved By:
Category:
Effective Date:
Revised Date:
Recognition Policy for Members of City Boards, Committees, and
Commissions
City Council
Administrative
September 18, 2001
I. Statement of Purpose.
The City of Southlake appreciates the role that citizens appointed to City Boards,
Committees, and Commissions play in shaping efficient and effective service delivery.
In order to recognize the hard work and dedication of citizen volunteers, the City desires
to guarantee equal and sufficient recognition of the contributions of all members of City
Boards, Committees, Ad hoc Committees, and Commissions at the conclusion of their
term.
H. Definitions.
A. City Boards, Committees, and Commissions — City Boards; Committees, and
Commissions whose members are formally appointed by the City Council at
regular intervals to serve for a designated term.
B. Special Ad hoc Committee — Ad hoc Committees whose members are formally
appointed by the City Council to address a specific or immediate problem or need.
C. Good Standing — Members of City Boards, Committees, and Commissions that
serve a full term or complete an unexpired term that became vacant, or members
of an Ad hoc Committee that serve until the resolution of a specific problem or
need without being removed for administrative violations of any kind from the
appointed position.
A member is considered in Good Standing if he/she resigned prior to the end of a
second or subsequent term for personal reasons.
D. Plaques — Recognition plaques shall be defined in the following categories:
1. Standard Plaque — Standardized plaque recognizing any appointed members
and executive officers that did not serve as a Chair or President during any
point of their appointed term.. (See Exhibit "A "forfurther clarification).
2. Executive Officer Plaque — Plaque differing from the Standard Plaque,
intended to recognize the contributions of the members who served as a Chair
Recognition Policy for Members of City Boards, Committees, and Conunissions Page I of 2
City of Southlake
Policies and Procedures
14
or President at some point during their appointed term. (See Exhibit `B"for
further clarification).
E. Staff Liaison — City staff member appointed by the City Manager to serve as a
liaison between the City and a particular City Board, Committee, Ad hoc
Committee, or Commission.
III. Recognition Policy.
A. The following City standard has been developed to recognize City Board,
Committee, and Commission members at the end of their term:
1. Recognition Standard — The City of Southlake shall formally and publicly
recognize all members of City Boards, Committees, Ad hoc Committees, and
Commissions who have completed their appointed terms, in good standing, at
a regular meeting of the City Council.
2. Recognition Procedures — The public recognition shall consist of the staff
liaison ordering and presenting a plaque to all qualified members of a City
Board, Committee, Ad hoc Committee, or Commission. The staff liaison will
coordinate all activities involved in the recognition event with the City
Secretary's Office in accordance with the City Council meeting policies and
procedures.
3. Mayoral Proclamations — In addition to the recognition plaques, the staff
liaison shall submit a request to the City Secretary's Office to process a
Mayoral Proclamation for all City Board, Committee, or Commission
members who have served for more than a full term.
IV. Method of Payment.
A. Project Accounting Procedures — The staff liaison will submit invoices for all
recognition plaques to the City Secretary for payment as budgeted, under the
"awards" line item.
Recognition Policy for Members of City Boards, Committees, and Com► fissions Page 2 of 2
C to
Exhibit "A" — Standard Plaque
A
Black Back Plate
7" x 8"
Estimated Cost - $38.25 per unit
Recognition Policy for Members of City Boards, Committees, and Commissions Page 3 of 4
Exhibit "B" — Executive Officer Plaque
M-
A
Frost gold back -plate with bright gold embossed frame
11" x 14"
Estimated Cost - $78.00 per unit
Recognition Policy for Members of City Boards, Committees, and Commissions Page 4 of 4
MEMORANDUM
September 14, 2001
TO: City Manager Billy Campbell
FROM: City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 292-B, Establishing times and places for meetings of the
City's Planning and Zoning Commission
Action Requested: Approval of Ordinance No. 292-B, amending Ordinance No. 292-A,
establishing times and places for the meetings of the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Background
Information: Ordinance No. 292-B establishes that the Planning and Zoning T
Commission shall meet on the Thursday following the first and third
Tuesday, provided that the Thursday does not fall on a city holiday. The
ordinance states that four members of the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
Ordinance No. 292-A indicates that the Planning and Zoning Commission
would meet at 667 North Carroll Avenue, therefore, making it necessary
to change this ordinance.
Financial
Consideration: n/a
Citizen Input/
Board Review: n/a
Legal Review: The City Attorney's office prepared Ordinance No. 292-B.
Supporting
Documents: Ordinance No. 292-B
Staff
Recommendation: Staff requests that this Ordinance be approved on 2nd reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 292-B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 292-A,
ESTABLISHING TIMES AND PLACES FOR THE MEETINGS OF THE
CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; PROVIDING A
REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
Section 1. The city Planning and Zoning Commission shall meet on the Thursday
following the first and third Tuesday, provided that the Thursday does not fall on a city holiday.
Four members of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective after its adoption by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
September 18, 2001
To: Billy Campbell, City Manager
From: Pedram Farahnak, Director of Public Works, 481-2308
Subject: Approve Ordinance No. 807, 2nd reading, abandoning a portion of
the public right-of-way for T.W. King Road within the Clariden
Ranch Addition (formally known as Crown Ridge Addition, Phase
1B) from Bob Jones Road to approximately 478 feet south.
Action Requested: Approve Ordinance No. 807, 2nd reading, abandoning a portion of the
public right-of-way for T.W. King Road within the Clariden Ranch
Addition (formerly known as Crown Ridge Addition, Phase 1B) from Bob
Jones Road to approximately 478 feet south.
Background
Information: The City Council approved Ordinance No. 807 on 1" reading on
September 4, 2001.
The final plat for Crown Ridge Addition, Phase 1B located at the
southwest corner of Bob Jones Road and T.W. King Road was approved
on June 8, 2000. The re -alignment of T.W. King Road from Bob Jones
Road to approximately 478 feet south was included in the final plat.
The new alignment for this section of T.W. King Road has been
constructed and vehicular traffic has been diverted to the new roadway.
All existing utilities located within the old section of T.W. King Road
have been relocated to the new T.W. King Road right-of-way.
It was understood at the time that when the final plat was approved,
depicting the new right-of-way, the old alignment of T.W. King right-of-
way would be abandoned. The developer is now requesting that the City
abandon the old right-of-way of T.W. King Road from Bob Jones Road to
approximately 478 feet south. The area of right-of-way to be abandoned
contains approximately 23,182 square feet.
Financial
Consideration: None.
Kq
0
Citizen Input/
Board Review: None.
Legal Review: None.
Alternatives: Council may approve or deny this ordinance.
Supporting
Documents: Ordinance
Plat Exhibit
Location Map
Staff
Recommendation: Please place on the City Council Agenda for September 18, 2001 for 2nd
reading and Council review and consideration.
Staff
Contact: Charlie Thomas, P.E., City Engineer, 481-2175
Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, 481-2308
PF/ta
ORDINANCE NO. 807
AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING CERTAIN
PORTIONS OF T.W. KING ROAD IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY
IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO EXECUTE QUIT CLAIM
DEEDS RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, INTEREST AND
CONTROL OF THESE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by
the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the
Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and
consideration, has determined that certain portions of T.W. King Road in the City of Southlake,
are not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a
public charge without a correspondence benefit, and the public would be better served and
benefited by its vacation and abandonment; and
WHEREAS, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of
the public in said right-of-way, the City desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title,
ownership, and control in said right-of-way to the owners of the abutting property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1
The following right-of-way in Clariden Ranch, Phase 113 is hereby vacated and
abandoned as public property: T.W. King Road, a dedicated public street, more specifically
described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B. Further, the franchise utility companies have
expressed no objection to the abandonment of said right-of-way as recounted in Exhibit C.
Exhibits A, B, and C are attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. The right-of-
way is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public
charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by
its vacation and abandonment. The right-of-way so vacated and abandoned shall revert in fee
simple to the owners of the abutting properties.
SECTION 2
The Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to
execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the right-of-way on
the behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas.
SECTION 3
A copy of said quitclaim shall be presented for filling with the County Clerk of Tarrant
County, Texas by the office of the City Secretary.
SECTION 4
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid
judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance,
since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this
ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
SECTION 5
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so
ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS 4th DAY OF
SEPTEMBER, 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF
2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
rl co ty DCSeriPtion.
OEIM3 a 0.522 acre tract of IWO in the R-0. Frice ELrvey, Abstract ru. 99P,
sittiatm in Ulu City of Scuthlake. Denton Canty. Texao and beirr.,1 a portion of that
tract canveyed to Terra/an-tblake roint venture by document: rmoraea uildLY'
Cuunty Clerks F)le No. OCK071225 0. tnrr Deed Accords of Denton Cp nty,
Texas LOF;DCT► and being morn wtirulwi^ o,--.criCed b:- ,f,331crgs:
C0k4c- -IIWd at a Px. Nail FCunr1, said nail U05r41 t:ie mrtnoest corner or the
said Terra/S,x,ihlPA0 Aint Venture tract; THEh'C1:_3 OD'3457' Z. a djolo cu
of 300 feet to the point of aeginnirg of the Nrcin castribeo tract;
TI,LNCE N 69'25'03" E. a' distance of 50.00 feet to a point:
TF-ME S C0134 �7' E. a d;9tence of A3,97 faat to a point, raid point Ceirg
the Point Of Qrvamro of a Cirmlar curve to the left having 8 rvjdit* of �jO.CC feet,
a ce-'ural angle of 59'06'56' Wd Doing txbtendsd by a chard which hears
S 30'CO '24' E , 49.33 feet:
TF&JU aicng 5aie curve to ttre left, a distance of 51.59 feet t0 a p0irit, :raid
point t:eifxq We point of ravomt Curvature of a circular, curve to Dye ritht hirving o
raditfs or bA44,afj feet, a Cent1181 &Vlo of 1'42'47' ar:d being "tenor by a
Owd •miirh bears S SV50 23' E. 207.53 R*t;
iFENCE along saw curve t0 in. rig'1t, a distzme of 207.64 feet to a point, sairl
ouint being the point of COMMpOrnd obrwetum of a circular curve- to- tre r)eht having
a radius of 475.00 feet, a central angle of 14'49'41' and being suotEraed fsy
a Owd Aich berms S 50'36:15` E, 121,49 feel:
TEI&'x arnng saib Curve to t"iC r•i$)t, a distarr=e of 121.82 Feet to a point;
IPll:txl' °; ria'34W' E. a diitwca of 45.8R feet to a point;
TlRa S 89'25v)3-- h', a distance of a5.10 Feet to a p0ir*. said paint tieing
tile P0114 Of Curvbtur'e of o circular curve to the left having a radiud Of 425.00 faet.
a central angin of W51 17" and Wirig �ubttvd d by a chcr6 whiCh bears
N 49'33:'.7' if, 12457 feet;
THENME along 3ai0 Curve t0 the left, a oistance of 125.02 Feet to a point, snit!
point being the point of CospW+d Ou^vatUne 0. 8 Ci►tiular curve to L`re left laving
a radius of 669413 feet, a central ang 1e of 3'42'47" and tieing subte�rrd by
a crmd mhich h�r's AM.50'29" it 2� Y4 fast;
THEK-E alung said curve to the left, a distarze of 2C6.1'3 Feet to a point. Said
Paint being •rue point of revCr"".,C oi-atune Of u circular curve to tree Mi W having a
radus of iDGM feet, a central angle of 599'0656" and tieing a&cnMd by a
chord mhkh bears N 33'08 2C" 'A, 9yJM Feet;
TI!Er,ILE a3ung said curve to the rigit, a di3terce of itl?.1f3 feet to a point;
TI!EN;,t N 00'347,7' K tb:-Kymt to said curve, a distance of 4397 Feet to
the Point Of Beginning and mr*ainiog 23,182 square feat or 0.532 acrss of laml
more or 1p&s. _
hQ � �;.
J. Mik"IRG5 ARE REFERENCED TO TIC MORpfr LINE Or THE SUMLAKE/SD•_AKA, LTD.
QUO 4$ 90C#YW0 IN VOL, A431� FG, TS:M DJFWZT.
GOOD �
MMSHAL.L
Scale i HONE
5ksei
�
or
2
DoIai JULY 2001
q'nLANOMERS-FLANNEAS--surn'eroris
tout mmw&r6tsl4ro0.
Maird (647)4*4M
Job No, 1 9863
Drofiedr R.D.P.
Checked, FZ ,Q ,Ff,
Exhibit B
,jrmCOMMENCM
WEST BOS JQNES ROAD '
qT OF
i0. TFRRA15,c[/TR.AKF ,1 WT v1:7ri {S7Ey
l
tit
C.C.F. Ab. C0W71225
4 D. R. D. C. T.
0
('}
\'3 1 m
RAI4ICN
'�
-
�✓
I
� �� � P+�4SE •IB
1
�
Y
A�
i !
COURT
aARDEN RANCH
. •k
1 �i
TERRAISCUTh4.AKF XWT VWFL ?E
�
G.C.F. no. 60007J225
CURVE DATA
"AYE
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
TANGIENT
DiQAD 6EAAIhY.,
CHORD
C
59TV56"
.14.Da'
SIM'
2l1.36'
S38'66'24"E
RL1:',J'
C2
1'4247•
"-IAQ'
2a7.64'
fA3.B3'
Sww-"B-E
n»a*
C3
t4.45*43'
475m,
M22'
61.291
sbla',fi't
t2s.49'
C4
t8'S1'77'
425AC'
:25AZ'
SP.97'
fa44'j8271,
124.57'
CS
1'd2'47•
6694.68'
'u0CAS-
.?9.Oa'
I'M1502'9'H
2C6.14'
Cb
w-06F56"
1o0A'J
109.16'
S8.71'
µWICg243{
93.55•
LINE DATA
LINE
21;aRING DISTANCE
L1
Ww 3w-E
54—W
L2
SM'3457'E
43,97'
L3
SCa'34'J7E
45.99,
L4
SQ9'25173?+
26.t4'
LS
WO*3, 57-M
43.W'
RUL
1. SWINGS APE REFESENCED TO TFC NDRTM LINE 4F THE SpUTFLARE/SdLANA. 1.70.
DEED AS KCOMED IN VOL._ 4133t PG. 1933. D.RD,C.T.
clooDwng I
AAM .LlL l
am�911CO M—PLAWRS-SURVEYCH3
Seakc; I' = 100'
Stteei
2
DE
0cle, DULY 2001
Job No. 9863
Oroficd. R.D.N.
ewl andwmrQo GL&1OQ FM i�41,r
Mow1Bi7)423aa73
Checked) R.D-�-
Exhibit C
1
16
IN
G1wnt►+a4ie�ion� I
Sjpoa
friwd i�amc: l
I
Tide.
Dia_
ow S&AW
UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS
•,•�'3e%Tt3h's�41"5.b'�i'a r,ai "- , .•"�n .,,,�. � y ti, o:i!/S. 4: Y6f',cw ..�e,����:� r �„e
.Tf e
We, �u,ders.� rtx o�ebo uti4tyrxwap�pt3tt�
my![C!S riC ObjECtiOata tbo a5aadanm�k 4f� �Trt OT t���r ze•msod tle'�e
1
116 NNW, Prat Nonc
Vahan
pricotid2:
'rive.
Lane:
Di�.n�d Sh�menel�
wHow tam:
ram.
I k-sipm r.piwu "to
We, the =dwsipvid. as MY au&mizad aPw==fivO of te rvRNwdicvdWftmPWiM
cqvm. objecuuntatba abu%dcm=d OHM *Man= t)CAO&4f-WW so DOW 6n Ox "OdOd
El*=- C"P-, mc-
verbm
r&dw6d
siiNtatdd NNW
34jdLw=m Bell
.Frhdcd w4mm
TAW
¢SroO�aoDs "Aa PAX
m as
We4ft�II1aersipcd. 9 ottbau d370DIp C(dw 11111=KC UWaTI;4F91X$M �M
ft
axWm of ete ®eat Of >iVbj-oAwW n mted. m 'oa 841 od
glit
TXU EIWWX t G0 [nfioundt�Ire4Ss+C�op+Lk
siigaa
rdm.d?ieme: Pt Drape 1'� ! Af
YalYiea+F
S�
TJrfc:
Diralnai3 3il�l�xlc
9'
pvbmd
TOM
Da7Y`
SGD* am% 9kii
What • --
rriedad Ntm
Tiar.
?JZ sfisn SAOEs'Z sb•8•'3n7
Glaetw Chia=
8(Ellad'
'lute:
Dow
Qosauna Coptl =iediaas
IWO&
PC Namo
Ts".
Od
`•8t:s 9),1 L141 !gAnt.+odaoo atjluvi3 (42nea-srl :d8 2ua
QUITCLAIM DEED
STATE OF TEXAS §
§ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of
Southlake ("Grantor"), does hereby bargain, sell, release, vacate, abandon and forever quit claim
unto: Terra/Southlake Joint Venture and any and all of their heirs, legal representatives or
assigns, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the property described on Exhibit "A"
and shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the above
described property unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, so that. neither Grantor nor
,. its heirs, legal representatives of assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the
aforesaid property premises or appurtenances or any part thereof.
EXECUTED this day of 72001.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, GRANTOR
MAYOR
STATE OF TEXAS §
�W §
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of
, 2001, by
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
My commission expires:
Type or Print Notary's Name
Return to:
City Secretary
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street
Suite 270
Southlake, Texas 76092
Grantee:
T.W. King ROW
to be abandonded
N
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
September 18, 2001
To: Billy Campbell, City Manager
From: Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, 481-2308
Subject: Ordinance No. 809, 2nd Reading, Amending 717 and 717-B and Chapter 18,
Article III, Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code; designating the speed
limit within Princeton Park Addition as 25 mph.
Action Requested: Consider amending Ordinance 717 and 717-B and Chapter 18, Article III,
Section 18-79 of the Southlake City Code to designate the speed limit on
all streets within the Princeton Park Addition, specifically Parkcrest Drive,
Boston Drive, Princeton Park, Harvard Drive, Yale Drive, Yale Court,
Cornell Place as 25 mph.
Background
Information: The City Council approved Ordinance No. 809 on I" reading on
September 4, 2001.
City Staff (Department of Public Works Safety and Public Works) have
been working with the Homeowners Association to investigate and reduce
the speeding concerns in the Princeton Park Addition.
The Public Works Department has received a petition of request from
Princeton Park property owners, for the City Council to consider reducing
the speed limit in Princeton Park Addition to 25 mph. The petition
includes 71% of the property owners in Princeton Park. This is the similar
speed limit reduction that has been done in several subdivisions
throughout the City.
On October 6 1998, the City Council passed an ordinance, lowering the
speed limit to 25 mph in the Timberlake Addition, which lies directly to
the west of Princeton Park Addition. The two subdivisions are connected
by Parkcrest Drive. Princeton Park Addition abuts White Chapel
Boulevard on its east side. The Princeton Park Addition does experience
traffic traveling from the Timberlake Addition to White Chapel
Boulevard. If the speed limit were reduced to 25 mph, it would provide
for a uniform speed limit throughout these two closely related
subdivisions.
Financial
Consideration: The cost of the signs will be in the range of $400 to $600, depending upon
the number needed. This amount of funds is available in the current
budget.
Citizen Input/
Board Review: City staff has been working with the Princeton Park Homeowners
Association.
Legal Review: Legal staff is reviewing the amended ordinance.
Alternatives: Council may approve or deny the amended ordinance.
Supporting
Documents: Ordinance No. 809
Princeton Park Homeowners Association Letter
Petition
Plat Exhibit
Location Map
Staff
Recommendation: Staff recommends that this request for Ordinance No. 809, amending
Ordinance 717 and 717-B, designating the speed limit in Stone Lakes
Addition, as 25 miles per hour be placed on the September 18, 2001
regular City Council Agenda for second reading. Should City Council
approve the request, City Council will need to state that the speed limit has
been lowered to 25 miles per hour due to the special hazard (speeding) that
exists.
Staff
Contact: Charlie Thomas, P.E., City Engineer, 481-2175
Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, 481-2308
Mike Patterson, Operations Manager, 481- 2101
PF/ta
ORDINANCE NO. 809 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 717, 717-B, AND
CHAPTER 18, "TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES", OF THE SOUTHLAKE
CITY CODE (1996), AS AMENDED, BY; DESIGNATING THE
SPEED LIMIT WITHIN THE PRINCETON PARK ADDITION AS 25
MILES PER HOUR; DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO POST APPROPRIATE SIGNS; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 545.352 (b) and 545.356, Texas Transportation Code,
the City of Southlake, Texas has the authority to establish prima facie maximum reasonable and
prudent speeds within its corporate boundaries for vehicles on streets and highways; and
WHEREAS, a special hazard exists that required a slower speed in order for an operator
to drive at a speed that is reasonable and prudent under the existing circumstances in the
neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, the prima facie maximum reasonable speed limits adopted herein are not in
conflict with any order of the Texas Transportation Commission declaring speed limits along any
roadways within the city limits of Southlake;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED
That section 18-79 of Chapter 18, "Traffic and Vehicles", of the Southlake City Code is
amended to read as follows:
The prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speed for travel on the portions of the
streets or highways designated in this section shall be the speed in miles per hour (mph)
designated as follows, provided that an appropriate sign giving notice thereof is erected:
25 miles per hour on Parkcrest Drive, Boston Drive, Princeton Park, Harvard Drive, Yale
Drive, Yale Court, Cornell Place.
SECTION 2. POSTING SIGNS; INVENTORY
The Director of Public Works is hereby directed to ensure that appropriate signs are
erected and maintained giving notice of the speed limits adopted in this ordinance and to file an
updated inventory indicating the new speed limits with the City Secretary as provided in Section
18-82 of the City Code.
SECTION 3. CUMULATIVE CLAUSE
This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of
Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the
provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are
hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable and if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid
judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance,
since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in its
ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
SECTION 5. PENALTY
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects, or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinance of the City of Southlake, or
any other ordinances or statutes adopting prima facie reasonable and prudent speed limits which
have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations
and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such
ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
disposition by the courts.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF
Tlurms]
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY
OF
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
EFFECTIVE DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
PRINCETON PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
P. 0. BOX 92691
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092
Southlake City Council
1400 Main
Suite 320
Southlake, Texas 76092
Dear City Council Members:
Please accept these signatures as our petition to the City of Southlake
requesting the lowering of our speed limit from 30 MPH to 25 MPH in the
Princeton Park sub -division.
The Homeowners Association and the residents of Princeton Park support this
effort as discussed at the May 24, 2001 meeting attended by Charlie Thomas
from the City.
We appreciate your help in attaining this lower speed limit for our residents.
Sincerely,
Sandy Ohmstede
Secretary
Princeton Park HOA
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By sigoature below, the residents of Princeton Park neighborhood indicate
their desire for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per hour (versus the current limit of 30 miles per hotie) throughout
the neighborhood.
Name
Address
PhoneNumber
Signature
C) r
Tt
76
77
T-1
wo
79
Pr5 Q4tia 0-7�
82
8-3
84
.33
86
87
SS
8 9
90
1,02
93
94
95
96
-7
99
tool
fiVote: Only, one signa
ture per household, please)
�d)
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signaturc below, the residents of Princeton 'ark neighborhood indicate
their desire for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per hour (versus the current ]unit of 30 miles per hour) throughout
the neighborhood.
Name Address Pbone Number Signatur
1 � � �,,�wsJCJ Oita �t��cE�o� G. - � - ��t 0 ��• �II
•� .--i + 0 -I
7 .aLIA( UL C�--*. �
3 rr 1- 1 AAW V RD d 7-11ht--�3-76
k, L�Q 1 (fir Vr I& i q� n ;��
1�2 q�l SRS�.._
1124
13
1
! f IF)W-7 N 7Y 716
1&
�'- 4c-L: Cirnash l
24 7125
I4
.Y
(Yore. Only one signature per hwiseholt, please j
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature below, the residents of Princeton Paris neighborhood indicate
their desire for the City of Southlak,e to establish and enforce a speed limit of
2S mites per hozzr (versus the current limit of 30 miles per hour) tk mughout
the neighborhood.
. NRmc
Address
Phone Number Signature
i
4
qoo
L sir �►2<..
U Orr.
�7 - 2i� n
7
8
Y
9
1
i Io
13
14
15
F
16
_
17
1$
C` 20
1� 21
j 2
23
24
I 25
(Wore: Only one signature per household, please.)
.5i'l,
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature below, the residents of Princeton Park neighborlmod indicate
their desire for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per Hour (vexsus the current lirir t of 34 miles per hour) throughout
the AeigMorhood,
ti�,frddrem
Phone Number
i Signature W
IA/I<L
! IeJf1 _n - •r
I ��E� F
2 � C 'WSI�
\C:
/V
8
t
9
s.
1.Q
�
1�
13
14
16
1
1-7
l 19 '
—
I20�
2?
13
24
Note_ Cmly one signature per household, please)
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By sure below, the residents of Princeton Park neighborhood indicate
their desire for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per hour (versus the current limit of 30 miles per hour) throughout
the neighborhood.
Name
Address
Phone Number t Signature_
1
2
ion Cc�
CJi Pr U fl
5
�33 4�� r�'
3
oA� d � Tc r
ea
-?— 5
-y
irn11
pvApo'�1td"5�$�
7
Ip$
9
0
1Q
It
12
13
14
15
116
I
l8
19
20
23
24FiT
;
( ore: Only one signature per househol4 please.)
ON
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature below, the residents of Princeton Park neighborhood indicate
their desire for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per hour (versus the current limit of 30 miles per hour') throughout
the neighborhood.
Nar#e
Address
Phone Number
Signature
r,-,
Af 4 2- I
i
2
_
4
b
7
10
12
13
14
lS
y
16
17
19
i
t
70
21
22
23
24
#
(xO?e; ;Only one digisancre per householg please.')
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature bclow, the residents of Princeton Park neighborhood indicate
their desirc for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per hour (versus the current limit of 30 miles per Dour) throughout
the neighborhood.
Nameyy
Phone Number
Signature �
26
j(Address
�+27
'
28
f
----
29
i
30
31
32
v
33
,
134
35
36
37
L38
39�
40
41
i
42
43
4-4
r:
46
47
48
49
(?Vote. Only one si ralure per household, plea-ve)
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature below, the residents of Ninceton Park neighborhood indicate
their desire for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per hour (versus the current limit of 30 miles per hour) tltFoughout
the neighborhood.
Name
Address
Phone Number
Signature
_
5
d ,
7 E
E
9
10
11 ,
12
13
t 14
16
17
Is ! i
19 ;
a0—
r 21
H-)
23
2`i I
25 s
(Nate Uri�y`one s�griature per ho4rsehok�';aderrse)
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature below, the residents of Princeton 'ark neighborhood hidicate
their desire for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed Jvnit of
25 miles per hour (versus the currmc limit of 34 miles per lour) throughout
the neighborhood.
Name Address Pbone Number 1 �ignaturc
I
VI 7-
1
9
110
J
�-
r
L2
i3
11 4
I
I
I
�
i
17
-
'-
1
�0
I
2�
21
22
23
24
75 i
(Note: Only one signature per household please)
/ Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature below, the residents of Princeton Park neighborhood indicatp,
their desire for the City of Southiake to establish and enforce a specd limit of
25 miles per hoar {versus the current limit of 30 miles per hour) throughout
the neigbboyhood.
IN"I M C Mdress Phone Number Sigpature_
L
n)
2izm ",-Ro oil
t) (Q tt-qv 4,j
51 L-7 4, 1 � -'SS-7 1-1
UT�2,
So4
L4Bf
6
—t2
14
16
17
19
.... ............................
23
24
(Note.- Only one signature per hmisehoA4 please)
W
e
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature below, the residents of Princeton Park neighborhood indicate
their desire for the City of SoutWake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per !tour (versus the current limit of 30 miles per hour) throueout
the neighborhood.
Address Phone Number Signature
i
3
4.
� 5
f
6
7
8
9
I 10
a
12
.3
14
15
16
17
I
Ir
7
i
19�
20
f
22
23
24
25
(Note: Only one signature pet' household, please, j
A
LM
Petition for Speed Limit Change
By signature below, the residents of Princeton Park neighborhood indicate
their desire for the City of Southlake to establish and enforce a speed limit of
25 miles per hour (versus the current limit of 30 miles per hour) throughout
the neighborhood. _
Name
:address
Phone Number
j Signature
7
I _
3 �y
i
4
j
5
6
i
71-8
9
- -
10
-F
11
1?
13
[14 �
15
16
i
17
18 I
� 19
?1
i
24
i ?5
(,'Vote: Only one sio ature per household, please.)
kA *11
j".
Ix
tu
OvAl
It
LA
�'-All TT
jig -A) A .. f- 'r:
Ak�
Princeton Park Addition
1
City of Southlake
•W-
DeDartmentz of Planning
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-083
PROJECT: Lot 5R7, Block 3 Cimmarron Acres
REQUEST: The City of Southlake, Texas is requesting approval of a rezoning and concept plan.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Consider 2"d reading for rezoning and concept plan request.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plans and Support Information
(D)
Site Plan Review Summary
(E)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(F)
Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(G)
Ordinance No. 480-376
(H)
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 481-2073
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/ APPLICANT: City of Southlake, Texas
PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located on the north side of W. Southlake Boulevard (F.M.
1709) approximately 1000' east of the intersection of W. Southlake
Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and North Pearson Lane.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5R7, Block 3, Cimmarron Acres and being 2.176 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial
CURRENT ZONING:
REQUESTED ZONING:
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Case No.
ZA01-083
"C-2" Local Retail Commercial District
"0-1" Office District.
Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have
130' of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this street.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed site will have one (1) access directly on to W. Southlake
Boulevard. And proposes two common access easement connections into the
property to the east. The property to the west is the City's ground storage
tank.
May, 2000 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 (between Pearson Lane & F.M.
1938
24hr
West Bound (WB) (18,556
East Bound (EB) (16,891
WB
Peak A.M. 1,180 11-12 a.m.
Peak P.M. 1,943 4-5 p.m.
EB
Peak A.M. 2,031 6-7 a.m.
Peak P.M. 1,101 5-6 p.m.
Traffic Generation Rates
Table #2
AM-
IN*
AM
OUT
PM-
IN
PM-
OUT
24-HR
IN
24 HR
OUT
Total VTPD
Gas Station
27
2
3
24
101
101
202
Attachment A
Page 1
ESTIMATED IMPACT
FEES*:
P&Z ACTION:
Pathways Master Plan
The Pathways Master Plan recommends that an eight (8) foot, paved Multi -
Use along the north side of F.M. 1709 (W. Southlake Boulevard).
Water
$7040 Assumes 2 — 2" simple meter
Wastewater
$7040 Assumes 2 — 2" simple meter
Roadway
$20,552 SA 8
* Nmal Impact bees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shown above only represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department.
July 19, 2001; Approved to Table (7-0) to the August 9, 2001, Planning and
Zoning Commission Meeting.
August 9, 2001; Approved to Table (6-0) to the August 23, 2001, Planning
and Zoning Commission Meeting.
August 23, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary
No. 1, dated July 13, 2001.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: September 4, 2001; Approved first reading (7-0).
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is CONCEPT PLAN Review Summary No. 2, dated August 31,
2001.
A variance is requested for driveway stacking depth. 75' is required and 42.5'
is provided.
N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2001cases\01-083ZCP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-083 Page 2
Vicinity Map
Lot 5111, Black 3 Cimmarron Acres
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
121
Lb
S
ZA01-083 Attachment B
Page 1
_s,
SWELL mwimnos C )DOIR
e
t
fillip
ZA01-083
3
a
� r 3
i p
11j; ilm, fill; fly 19!_�, i
PHI IN IA
E
fill! 11111.,
it
S
al
i
I
I
-MEN MEN
rF
Attachment C
Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA01-083 Revised Review No.: One Date of Review: 8/23/01
Project Name: Concept Plan — Lot 5R7, Block 3 Cimmarron Acres
APPLICANT: ENGINEER:
City of Southlake SunCoast Architects, Inc.
(817) 481-2041 (817) 424-4277
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/02/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073.
1. Driveway stacking depth of 75' is required. 42.5' is provided. (A variance is requested.)
Informational Comments:
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Street, Water & Sewer
Impact Fees, Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
This review is based on the "O-1" Zoning District Regulations.
This site falls within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by
Ordinance 480-CC, Section 43, Part III "Residential Adjacency Standards" as well as the Corridor
Overlay Zone regulations in Section 43, Part II. Although no review of the following issues is
provided with this concept plan, the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to
submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. Note that these issues are
only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance
with all site plan requirements:
Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No.
557, as amended.
Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended
Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended.
ZA01-083 Attachment D
Page 1
IM
• Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d,
Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as
amended.
• Spill -over lighting and noise per City Ordinance.
• Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for
vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance
No. 480, as amended.
• Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544.
• Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department.
L:\COMDE V\WP-FILES\REV\#CPLAN- I . WPD
Case No.
ZA01-083
Attachment D
Page 2
Surrounding Property Owners
.. Lot 5R7, Block 3, Cimmarron Acres
Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1. City of Southlake
1.
SF -IA
1.
Low Density Residential
1.
1.00
2. City of Southlake
2.
SF -IA
2.
Low Density Residential
2.
1.00
3. City of Southlake
3.
SF -IA
3.
Low Density Residential
3.
1.73
4. W. Brumbalow
4.
AG
4.
Low Density Residential
4.
19.57
5. JNS Land Family Limited Prt
5.
AG
5.
Low Density Residential
5.
4.02
6. Century Properties Prtnshp
6.
AG
6.
Low Density Residential
6.
1.81
7. R. Travis
7.
AG
7.
Low Density Residential
7.
1.34
8. City of Southlake
8.
CS
8.
Public/Semi-Public
8.
3.33
ZA01-083 Attachment E
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Lot 5R7, Block 3, Cimmarron Acres
Notices Sent: Five (5)
Responses: See attached letter received during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held
August 23, 2001.
ZA01-083 Attachment F
Page 1
Kq
In
'AC 56 - -
f rri�,+� �`'J d'p � � � f C� . �y •teCJ19 .N x�
drC� ,2.frd/0 o S to ?-ems
' , -7 - V—.T/ - Tp7- 7- -
ZA01-083 Attachment F
Page 2
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.480-376
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOT 5R7, BLOCK 3, CIMMARRON ACRES, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A,
SLIDE 3321, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND
BEING 2.176 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT AS
DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED
HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B",
SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by
the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "C-2" Local Retail
ZA01-083 Attachment G
Page 1
Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-083 Page 2
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,
are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being Lot 5R7, Block 3, Cimmarron Acres, an addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3321, Plat
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-083 Page 3
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being 2.176 acres, and more fully and
completely described in Exhibit "A" from "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District
to "O-1" Office District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto
and incorporated herein as Exhibit `B".
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance
with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general
welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and
the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the
streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the
community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration
among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses
and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land throughout the community.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-083 Page 4
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued
violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under
such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-083 Page 5
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 92001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-083 Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of .2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-083 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Lot 5R7, Block 3, Cimmarron Acres, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3321, Plat Records, Tarrant County,
Texas, and being approximately 2.176 acres.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-083 Page 8
EXHIBIT "B"
.VXRL
Mvid "aafioo - Flaulo
�� U
fil R a
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-083 Page 9
City of Southlake
DeDartment of Planning
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-072
PROJECT: QuikTrip — Commerce Business Park
REQUEST: On behalf of James R. Stacy, QuikTrip Corporation is requesting approval of a
rezoning and site plan.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Consider 2nd reading for rezoning and site plan.
2. Conduct a public hearing.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plans and Support Information
(D)
Site Plan Review Summary
(E)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(F)
Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(G)
Ordinance No. 480-372
(H)
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Case No.
ZA01-072
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: James R. Stacy
APPLICANT: QuikTrip Corporation
PURPOSE: To acquire zoning and site plan approval for construction of a gas station and
convenience store.
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the southwest corner of Southlake Boulevard and
Commerce Street.
HISTORY: This is part of the Commerce Business Park that was zoned and developed
as a light industrial business park in 1986.
A zoning change and site plan for "S-P-1" with C-3" uses to include gas
station with convenience store was denied by the City Council in February
2001.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Lots 1 & 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, being 3.029 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and Industrial
CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Industrial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District
REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial
District uses to include Gas Station with Convenience Store.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have
130' of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this roadway. The
Master Thoroughfare Plan makes no recommendation for Commerce Drive.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed site will have one (1) access directly on to Southlake
Boulevard (F.M. 1709) from a private drive west of the site and one (1)
access onto Commerce Street.
Commerce Drive- is a two (2) lane (north/south) local roadway with two (2)
north bound lanes at its intersection with F.M. 1709.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-072 Page 1
DRAINAGE
ASSESSMENT:
WATER AND SEWER:
ESTIMATED IMPACT
FEES*:
Case No.
ZA01-072
E. Southlake Boulevard -is a five lane, undivided arterial with a continuous,
two-way, center left turn lane. The roadway will ultimately be widened to
a seven lane roadway. A traffic signal has been installed at the intersection
of E. Southlake Boulevard and Commerce.
Gateway Drive- is a four (4) lane undivided arterial that begins at Southlake
Boulevard and terminates at the east bound State Highway 114 frontage road.
May, 2001 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 (between S.H. 114 & Kimball
Avenue): Table #1
24hr
West Bound (WB) (22,828
East Bound (EB) (22,459
WB
Peak A.M. 1,356 11 a.m-12 pin
Peak P.M. 2,104 5 .m.-6 p.m.
EB
Peak A.M. 2,077 7a.m-8a.m
Peak P.M. 1,462 12 .m.-1 p.rn
Traffic Impact
The I.T.E. Manual projects the site will generate a total of 3,910 vehicle trips
per day, with 381 vehicle trips during the A.M. peak traffic period and 472
vehicle trips in the P.M. peak. It is estimated that 56% of the vehicle trips
will be pass -by trips and that 31 % will be diverted linked trips. Therefore,
only about 13% or 509 vehicle trips per day will be Primary Trips (new trips
added to the road system).
During the A.M. and P.M. peak periods, it is estimated that the site will
create 50 new vehicle trips in the morning and 61 new trips in the evening.
Therefore, the traffic impact of the site on Southlake Boulevard traffic
volumes during A.M. and P.M. peaks times is minimal.
Please note that this is a statistical average of convenience stores/gas stations
across the country and local circumstances will vary.
Traffic Generation Rates
Table #2
AM-
IN*
AM
OUT
PM-
IN
PM-
OUT
24-HR
IN
24 HR
OUT
Total VTPD
Gas Station
194
187
236
1236
1,955
1,955
3,910
Storm water is primarily being carried into an existing 30" under ground RCP
storm water pipe located under Commerce Street and Southlake Boulevard
by an on -site under ground storm water system.
Connection to the existing 6" sewer line located in Commerce Street and 12"
water line located in Southlake Boulevard is proposed.
Water 1 $5,947.65 (Assumes 1 — 2" simple meter
Attachment A
Page 2
Wastewater $3,706.37 Assumes 1 — 2" simple meter
Roadway $8,373.36 SA 2, w/24 fueling positions)
rmai impac[ rees are aeiermmea dy the nuuamg Nervices Department at the time of Building
Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department,
P&Z ACTION: July 5, 2001; Approved to Table (6-0) to Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting July 19, 2001.
July 19, 2001; Approved (6-1), granting requested variances.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: August 7, 2001; Approved to Table on Consent (5-0) to the August 21, 2001,
City Council Meeting.
August 21, 2001; Approved to Table on Consent (5-1) to the September 4,
2001, City Council Meeting.
September 4, 2001; Approved (4-2) subject to Site Plan Review Summary
No. 1, dated July 13, 2001, allowing requested variances; providing austin
stone on the canopy columns; meeting or exceeding the landscaping shown
on the landscape plan and on the renderings unless there is a conflict with
city ordinances or construction identified by the city's landscape
administrator.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated July 13, 2001.
When requested as a Specific Use Permit, the City's Zoning Ordinance
requires all gasoline service stations on the F.M. 1709 corridor be located at
signalized arterial intersections (as defined in the city's Master Thoroughfare
Plan). The Thoroughfare Plan does not provide a definition. The requirement
is designed to ensure that the supporting street infrastructure can handle
higher volumes of traffic during peak hours of traffic loading (Ordinance
480, Section 45.10). The subject site is located at the signalized intersection
of Southlake Boulevard (Arterial), Gateway Drive (arterial) and Commerce
Street (local street). Staff finds that, although the applicant is not bound by
this requirement, this location meets the criteria for the Specific Use Permit,
because the existing signal and infrastructure will readily accommodate
demand.
The applicant is requesting variances to the following:
Horizontal articulation on a portion of the north building facade
required by Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.9c 1 d, under the provisions
of Ord. 480, Sect. 43.9b;
Pitched Roof on the convenience store building, required by
Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.9cIb, under the provisions of Ord. 480,
Sect. 43.9b;
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-072 Page 3
• Pitched Roof on the pump canopy, required by SUP Gas Station
Regulations, Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.10. A mansard type roof
system is proposed as a regulation under the provisions of Ord. 480, Sect.
31, "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District.
M\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\200Icases\01-072ZSP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-072 Page 4
Vicinity Map
QuikTrip - Commerce Business Park
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
W
N
S
E
Case No. Attachment B
ZA01-072 Page 1
- a
't
Ir^
•gF
I je
73'
.
I
1—
__-__- --pyyY
Case No.
ZA01-072
IJ
I
ITO
-21
a�J
. . . . . . . . . .
Pvo
1 1 LJ \
pp ,
4:�
0
Attachment C
Page 1
IM
IM
y.8-2
was umv
— 77
m'b
I I
�-f
_r
ougcoxuwg
PR9
m
pe)euiwfgl PeB - -_
WW$ leek '
1 C
4M-h o1)uRd.___
O
m
yWery of WRd—
mle. W
m
_1 1 J
w
.10
M
I
cal
3
[ f
I
1
W
05 o X
CC
�1
-
� o
(n
m
C �
`J
�>
W c E
Y O
� U
<
o
n °8
.I
-0 cc
W
O
_- u
o x
O L
J
COO O
!n c
Case No. Attachment C
ZA01-072 Page 2
p
uwnloo
pus Gumse—ke
5uyoos
W&n4S dsv
pu.s
pgeulwnlll pey
eq—zl
auC.dwe4o lelew
uOIS
OW00W
.IBIS IRLOW
pun
pq.ulwnlp p.y
0
dl .
W .u0Ww.40p""pAMV
C
tL pus .UC4"q
O_
Q
M
_
o
O1
Q Z
N �
v
O
m
2
0
O
9
N
-
C. m =
«I ml
� EU
GIs ,E a
4I$
�i i$gt
i 3
4' 4
ol�
Case No. Attachment C
ZA01-072 Page 3
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA 01-072 Review No: One Date of Review: 7/13/01
Project Name: Site Plan — Quicktrip Lot 1, Block B, Commerce Business Park
APPLICANT:
ARCHITECT:
Quicktrip Corporation The Hoover/Klein Group, Inc.
PO Box 3475 1.361 W. Euless Boulevard, Suite 99
Tulsa, OK 74101 Euless, TX 76040
Phone: (817) 358-7695 Phone: (817) 283-8830
Fax: (817) 858-0213 Attn: Walt McMennamy Fax: (817) 283-9189 Attn: Bryan Klein
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/11/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073.
General Development Standards Applies Comments
Corridor Overlay Regulations
Y
See Comment No. 1 & 2
Residential Adjacency
N
NA
Building Articulation
Y
See Comment No. 1
Masonry Standards
Y
Complies
Impervious Coverage
Y
Complies
Bufferyards
Y
Complies
Interior Landscape
Y
Complies
Driveways
Y
Complies
Lighting
Y
Complies
1. Vertical and Horizontal articulation is required along the north, west and east facades. The north
fagade does not comply with horizontal articulation (see attached chart). (Variance Requested)
2. Corridor Overlay and Gas Station regulations require a full "pitched roof construction" on the building
and canopy, respectively. Plan proposes a pitched roof on the main structure with a flat deck on the
south portion of the building for mechanical equipment and a mansard type roof system on the
canopy. (Variance Requested)
Show driveway locations along the north side of Southlake Boulevard. Show and label Gateway Plaza
Addition, Cab. A, Slide 5365 & 5366. Show and label Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 of this
plat.
4. Show and label a 50' building line along the property line.
Case No.
ZA01-072
Attachment D
Page 1
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
* This "S-P-1" Zoning and Site Plan request proposes a Gas Station Convenience Store as a
"permitted use" rather than by Specific Use Permit. This plan has been reviewed using the criteria
established for Gas Station/Convenience Stores under Ordinance 480, Section 45.10 and the "C-2"
local retail commercial district.
When requested as a Specific Use Permit, the City's Zoning Ordinance requires all gasoline service
stations on the F.M. 1709 corridor be located at signalized arterial intersections (as defined in the
city's Master Thoroughfare Plan). The Thoroughfare Plan does not provide a definition. The
requirement is designed to ensure that the supporting street infrastructure can handle higher volumes
of traffic during peak hours of traffic loading (Ordinance 480, Section 45.10). The subject site is
located at the signalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (Arterial), Gateway Drive (arterial) and
Commerce Street (local street). Staff finds that, although the applicant is not bound by this
requirement, this location meets the criteria for the Specific Use Permit, because the existing signal
and infrastructure will readily accommodate demand.
Although the west driveway intersecting E. Southlake Blvd. does not meet spacing requirements,
this driveway is existing and was previously approved as a common access driveway.
Please be aware that an Amended Plat (if no easements are to be abandoned or relocated) or a Plat
Revision must be approved and filed in the County Plat Records prior to issuance of any building
permit on this site. Also, it should be noted that there is an approved site plan associated with the
S-P-1 zoning for the Stacy Furniture site. Approval of this request will require, at minimum,
approval of a revised site plan and possibly a rezoning of the Stacy Furniture site prior to any
construction on that property.
* The proposed site does not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage
of 70% for the "C-2" Zoning District. The impervious coverage area percentage is approximately
50%.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require
construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance
No. 479.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and
filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include
but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Street, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and
related Permit Fees.
NACommunity Development\wP-FILES\REV\2000\00-132sp2.doc
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-072 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owners
QuikTrip - Commerce Business Park
Property Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1.
Wyndham Properties
1.
S-P-2
1.
Mixed Use
1.
0.09
2.
Wyndham Properties
2.
S-P-2
2.
Mixed Use
2.
32.00
3.
Wyndham Properties
3.
S-P-2
3.
Mixed Use
3.
1.03
4.
State of Texas
4.
I-1
4.
ROW
4.
0.60
5.
S. Anderson
5.
I-1
5.
Retail Commercial
5.
0.77
6.
HK Marvin Ltd.
6.
I-1
6.
Industrial
6.
2.02
7.
P & P Management
7.
I-1
7.
Industrial
7.
1.88
8.
J. Stacy
8.
S-P-1
8.
Industrial
8.
4.05
9.
Shur ard/Fremont Partners
9.
S-P-2
9.
Industrial
9.
4.57
10. Ja ua Enterprises
10. S-P-2
10. Retail Commercial
10. 0.70
11. Caddy Prop. M mt.
11. S-P-2
11. Retail Commercial
11. 1.95
12. State of Texas
12. S-P-2
12. ROW
12. 0.77
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-072 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
QuikTrip — Commerce Business Park
NOTICES SENT: Nine (9)
RESPONSES: Three (3) responses were received from within the 200' notification area:
• Stephen Anderson, DDS, 2915 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 100, Southlake, TX,
HIGHLY opposed, "Would create a huge traffic problem at an already very
congested and accident prone intersection." (Received June 27, 2001)
Paul Jaqua, DBA Dry Clean Super Center, 2821 E. Southlake Boulevard,
Southlake, TX, is opposed, "This project appears totally out -of -character for
the surrounding properties/buildings, built at great cost to comply with
rigorous zoning/planning/infrastructure additions leading to incremented
taxes. Nothing should risk a decline in value of surrounding/existing
properties. (Received July 6, 2001)
Juneho Cha, DBA Dry Clean Super Center (new ownership), 2821 E.
Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received July 19, 2001)
Five (5) responses were received from outside the 200' notification area:
• Harvey Holden, DFW Airport, Noise Compatibility Office, "The proposed
rezoning appears to be compatible with DFW International Airport noise.
(Received June 28, 2001)
• Chin Po, 305 S. Kimball Ave., Southlake, TX, is in favor.
• Johnny Beech, 701 Whispering Woods, Southlake, TX, is in favor.
• Downey Enterprises LLC 2545 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, TX., is
opposed, See attached letter (Received August 20, 2001).
• Haroon Alvi, 708 Chatham Ct., Southlake, TX., is opposed, " I understand that
the Quicktrip Corporation wants to build a mega plex gas station at Southlake
Blvd. and Commerce St. As a resident of Southlake, I oppose the approval of
such a development and any zoning change associated with this proposed
development." (Received August 22, 2001)
Case No. Attachment F
1A01-072 Page 1
August 17, 2001
Dear City of South lake:
Forlunalcly, one of the local business owners on l 7V) romrarded in formation to
our corporation pertaining to the proposed Quik'l)-ip 12 island mega gay station on the
corner of 114 and Commerce.
It is a shame that inforniation about a busincss which will bring such incredible
impact to the other businesses in the near vicinity is so difficult to be obtained. We
understand that the majority of commercial property within tho 200 feet rule of the Gas
$1ation mega-plcx is proporty oAmod by developers. l hope that you evilI also weigh the
ooncenns of Southlak,e business owners who are also residents or Sou[hlako.
he private 416 ve the applicant plans to test does not have a light, Presently traffic
is backed up throughout the day from the 1709.114 tnerge all the %ay down to our
business in Georget,oNvn Turk. 1 can not imagine a car being abbe to turn west out of this
Private drive. We can ho rdly get out of Georgetown Park.
I have %railed myself trying to act out of Shurrd Storage- some days it scans
chose to impossible without gunning the gas and praying you don't get hit.
So many business owners along our portion -or 1709 have gone 10 &Mat personal
expense to build high gWlity comrncaoiah construction, I question this decision to place a
mega gas station cornpkx right in the middle of it.
While T certainly realize the property oti peps concern to maxicai4e Ehcxr personal
income from the salt of this propcxty, I would ask than fo be just as concerned about
their city. I hope that should our council vote for this project that they would hold the
applicant to the llighesl standards and grant no v uriarcces. I Would az;k why same
buildings arc rcquircd to be of the highest standards and othcrs aren't,
Sinccrely,
Downey ZAtetprises UC
h
Southwestern
l lnfarmatlon Rubltshlna
RED AUG 2,a2001
2545 E. South lake Blvd - Southlake,'1i exas 76092-6609
(817) 416-6661 - Fax (817) 416-6882
Case No.
ZA01-072
Attachment F
Page 2
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.480-372
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK B,
COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK, BEING 3.029 ACRES, AND MORE
FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM
"I-1" INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN
DISTRICT TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "C-
2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES TO INCLUDE
GAS STATION WITH CONVENIENCE STORE, AS DEPICTED ON
THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND
GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by
the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "I-1" Industrial District
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 1
and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 2
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,
are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 3
Being portions of Lots 1 & 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the
(, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume
388-214, Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately
3.029 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "I- l"
Industrial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to "S-P-I" Detailed Site
Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses to include gas station
with convenience store as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit `B", and subject to the specific conditions established
in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit "C."
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance
with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general
welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and
the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the
streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the
community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 4
among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses
and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued
violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 5
such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 92001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the
%To
ATTEST:
day of , 2001.
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being portions of Lots 1 & 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the 'City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.029 acres.
r
� 1 7
ALTA/A ('SM l� ND TITLE' SVRVi�,Y
[)e;r, d de5i,:r1p#ron Of U 3.031 acre tract of Ivnd situoteci
in Of thorrIu S l a w er Surrey alb 5 rrvrt No 1174_ in the C 4 fy
of _ u t nJak e, )*grrgn t (: o Wnty, TC.KQU, E rid being o IJ of Lot
t
7 a t! port itarl of I_ o t 2, 131ack A of Cr mmerc a f lusan ess
P<;A on orpdi tiron to the City I)f southi oke as 4huwn on Me
Pros ecarded in Vgfurnc 365 • •21, al Pojr?F! 60 of VIE Ple3f
re'adrDs of Tarrant Cour&V, %X(Rd:
EtFCj-t"y
IN rr1 a r f;? inch steer rud set far r.corrlrf r7L xilo
c�
Jnfemoon of the rrrent saalth r itTh#- OJ'- rrvy finC of
StabElnulevorki (F'M 1709. u worioble wrt,Jtr1
rrghof•-wct�rj with IhC yweS1 r hl •or—w0jr Jura1)r Corr,rnr_rrc
(a 5F. (neat wide. rirjM—f•- wffy). r?14in
,4grJ�dgrrir►rtt erltrirrd jrti rrurtie Iva2.#b T:aff. S. f • f7 :tYfcrJ
theete of fexfls arrd Tor•rvrlf Govnty, laxas, Ys An! 0
Or, efa1, find Rtzcord-6rJ ire Vo urrte f1}764 at Pc;ge ;44J
of r)er:.kJ F7ot•f3rd:, c,f Tarrant Counlyr. Texas_
7111_
F . ],Ulri rj(i Zjt fq. S� roirl. _it; 901'. COs1, rk-f�r7rtlII .yur0
S8u
i�ua�werfy urA olpr►yPa foe W as f Jine of yrlid
93.96 feat to n 112- :nr.fl
Car,
eirr.e Slrept, o di.rlvnr:c of
tv.
Slao
rod RN t for G rrrner rlt the b0J:9iru>in 4 CIF a c urw
i
th a
rg h L. ta. rirl r+q Cl cen t rof u ng1e Of 0:5 jog_ 0-Ij Mrn. 28 �
�C C
ri ra-thus drs tarlGe of , "7 00 (aril. a I r-hof d d i 5 f d r1Ce
Pf
1CJ ir+rl_ pnd u r;hrarty henrifig of youth 04 deq �7
r-ni
. 22
rH
i
Ct saufherfr oJorir sfjid curve to MCI r+ghl, on airr-
di&l
qncc cf 2N 7f feel ray n 04ral rod 50 fair
Caw
loer;
T 1
X Souttj rJ i rMg. 2 q rnrri. 08 se r.. to r:l. c wtitm I ern
tllc�
acrirJ wegtd Jinn. o disfoor_e of 109.70 ft!rt i ► •]
InC h s f ee I r or1 sift tr>,r c-or nee,
T1'}lf:t:
5tsqjtf► 85 de4_ T min. J f scr.. 4Mcr:l, deperrtlny sold
i:a
�rGe Sfrec't. dl?!ante or 414.77 feet t(L e7 1Lhi:s0J4-4
for ccl rat an the went line of 5e1id odditiorl rend
rye
on thn CQ?I irne of P f roir l of la rid r; onway-ed I L.
5h
9card T exe7 s limited Fear t fawrshfp a y :rho ern in ra dooct rr. r_or de d
ir►
rums 1300; of Page 0446 of the D-ved R*cDrcis of J'ptrOnt
C
ty. f e Ka:i.
Case No.
Attachment G
ZA01-072
Page 8
MEN4 )4arth 01 dog. 29 ruin 16 gtc. Weal, nluri� thn
r�vr►�r�i n line between sta;d addition grad rani Sherrs!
tror,#, distonce of 321.35 feat to a Onse..led "ut 5 l to
carry ch the preWous1y s0+4 stwutxi right —of —Way line of
Sant ke SoWavard, d nd b6pg an a curve t u Ow. ae t!
Aetvitr -ad lrcrr rlr�,foe of 03 d*q 45 rain 56 sec., a
moll distdnca of 1.974.1i6 f"I. a Chord distorsra fif
129. feat. unrJ a rhL%rd heorinr7 elf Soutt} 89 d6q. .',7, rnin
47 ! . East.
THEN10f a03terly alor q time !I(jid sv.i(h hn* of raovhhike
Saule% r d f ha f otrowrr,q:
itaroy alont) said crjrwe to Me left an ar'c• di-tr#iCdb
I29-/9 fit la a concrete rficnuryieni taiuid , for
nee,
th 87 dey 75 mill_ 1.5 see Ergot, 4) dr'stonrg W
. r.3 fr.ci to o can ripte rnun"rnaril 1o41nd for r.tarner;
r1h 85 Oaq, 19 min. W Sa-L. Fast, a distaoce at
2.7.1 feet to tho PGJN7 OF BEG-R NFN'G:
aM4 jintoonijiq 3. 0.$I acres cor 1.32. 032 4quor a feel of (0.0d
more I or trisp
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 9
EXHIBIT YB"
LL,
f f
S
YI'll
jpp ap '"$ff ygyg y9 5� - i4' N
g€�6 �ii fi eye { Ei;g i Gr BFF�; O -
�y�a�°� cFx�yy� � �k � T��ggQYgg
vilit! 83 6' � �d�3I Sj iE
ITPp to ie; (( y� [ ' �jS Yyyg Q p� p!E Y o
J FETY� Y't�ay C y 6 SOb [ K S-
j�' „Rc„Raib �. $"..
#�4{4SppYpg�p 9yy pPrY6ysysQgQg4 �i YF Z
,`Iij:13�.i�R-
I II p
6 II: I
Y�O<SSsC
-- - - - - - -- I. ...... ....... - A ili i� i
Ji
i p
---------
-- — -- -241
- ---,L338LS 3�M3W 0�4
CCis
Y...:.. ..7777..
Case No.
ZAOI-072
Attachment G
Page 10
IN
0
I
p+9-.7.
WqS u!IYnV ---
_1
m
WgNtwlg
PRS
el
� li
G.NN�MI Wtl —_
W%S WU
ni
�
C yalery oy lumd-
O
eugS Many
m
m
I
W
I
�
J
mp
w
.8 ,Z
S
11
io
Q
8 —.z N
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 11
0
RA
uwM.7
�f .�9 eWlsaxua8
.IdN4S IR4doY
Ou.B
roPu!—m ad
�S
Midi 4.4dw
P.8
P.WutUmd v.e
0
U .w.e
LLI *" .."..u.8 —
T
C
n
O
m
-
L
_>
wo
C
W
vL
ro
i_
L
F �
LL
O
C F
m �
� 5
A
W U 5
0
Q c y
E
0 � at
0
C E
e
o
m;
at
V
-
�CZ
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 12
EXHIBIT "C"
This page reserved for the approved City Council motion.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-072 Page 13
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-073
PROJECT: QuikTrip — Commerce Business Park
REQUEST: On behalf of James R. Stacy, QuikTrip Corporation is requesting approval of a
specific use permit.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing
2. Consider specific use permit.
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Exhibit
(D) Surrounding Property Owner Map
(E) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(F) Resolution No. 01-056
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Case No.
ZA01-073
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: James R. Stacy
APPLICANT: QuikTrip Corporation
PURPOSE: Receive city approval to sale alcoholic beverages for off -premise
consumption.
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the southwest corner of Southlake
Boulevard and Commerce Street.
HISTORY: This is part of the Commerce Business Park which was zoned and
developed as a light industrial business park in 1986.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Lots 1 & 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, being
3.029 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and Industrial
CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Industrial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District
REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail
Commercial District uses to include Gas Station with Convenience
Store.
P&Z ACTION: July 5, 2001; Approved to Table (6-0) to Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting July 19, 2001.
July 19, 2001; Approved (7-0).
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: August 7, 2001; Approved to Table on Consent (5-0) to the August
21, 2001, City Council Meeting.
August 21, 2001; Approved to Table on Consent (5-1) to the
September 4, 2001, City Council Meeting.
September 4, 2001; Approved to Table on Consent (7-0) to the
September 18, 2001, City Council Meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS: A site exhibit is included as attachment `C' of this packet. This request
is subject to an appropriate change of zoning request and site plan
approval. (pending Case No. ZA01-072)
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-073 Page 1
Vicinity Map
QuikTrip - Commerce Business Park
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
0
Case No. Attachment B
ZA01-073 Page 1
I
_--
r
-—-- _ �-_ —� !•dal
am
ee
--pad
U S
K,0
14
i
N
54p`
G
W
M1
u
15n i a M
3
Sg
.
N
3
Np
pp
�
�R
N
r,�
99
gg
CtitR8
I
I i
g
x i�3Jff"71
I I >Wa
p
..
P;y
O
a
1e 1 4 tE
i
-
-
R
1
z
Case No. Attachment C
ZA01-073 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
QuikTrip - Commerce Business Park
Property Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1.
Wyndham Properties
1.
S-P-2
1.
Mixed Use
1.
0.09
2.
Wyndham Properties
2.
S-P-2
2.
Mixed Use
2.
32.00
3.
Wyndham Properties
3.
S-P-2
3.
Mixed Use
3.
1.03
4.
State of Texas
4.
I-1
4.
ROW
4.
0.60
5.
S. Anderson
5.
I-1
5.
Retail Commercial
5.
0.77
6.
HK Marvin Ltd.
6.
I-1
6.
Industrial
6.
2.02
7.
P & P Management
7.
I-1
7.
Industrial
7.
1.88
8.
J. Stacy
8.
S-P-1
8.
Industrial
8.
4.05
9.
Shur ard/Fremont Partners
9.
S-P-2
9.
Industrial
9.
4.57
10. Ja ua Enterprises
10. S-P-2
10. Retail Commercial
10. 0.70
11. Caddy Prop. Mgmt.
11. S-P-2
11. Retail Commercial
11. 1.95
12. State of Texas
12. S-P-2
12. ROW
12. 0.77
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-073 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
QuikTrip — Commerce Business Park
NOTICES SENT: Nine (9)
RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received within the 200' notification area:
• Harvey Holden, DFW Airport, Noise Compatibility Office, "Issuance of the
Specific Use Permit requested would have no known impact on DFW
International Airport noise. (Received June 28, 2001)
• Paul Jaqua, DBA Dry Clean Super Center, 2821 E. Southlake Boulevard,
Southlake, TX, is opposed, "This project appears totally out -of -character for
the surrounding properties/buildings, built at great cost to comply with
rigorous zoning/planning/infrastructure additions leading to incremented
taxes. Nothing should risk a decline in value of surrounding/existing
properties. (Received July 6, 2001)
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-073 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO.01-056
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR
A GASOLINE SERVICE STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE
ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS,
BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 & 2,
BLOCK B, COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK, BEING 3.029 ACRES,
MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A",
AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED
HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for a gasoline service station with a convenience store has been
requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "S-P-1" Detailed
Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses to include gas station with convenience
store; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1 (40) and 45.10 of the City's
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given
the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in
the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use
Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for a gasoline service station with a convenience store on
the property being legally described as portions of Lots 1 & 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, an
addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-214,
Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.029 acres, more fully and
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-073 Page 1
Resolution No.01-056
Page 2
completely described in Exhibit "A", and as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in
the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific
requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit:
1.
2.
3.
4.
SECTION 2.
This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 92001.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
By:
Stacy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandra L. LeGrand
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
City of Southlake, Texas
Rick
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-073 Page 2
Resolution No.01-056
Page 3
EXHIBIT "A"
Portions of Lots 1 & 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 3.029 acres
r
J AL7'A f A(',RM 1,lND TITLE' S'URVEY
I
) PROpF. RTY 1ICSCRIPTION
N;n I o deye;riptron of to .3.031 ac-re tract yr land situctrd
in 1:14 thorrias rasrer $urvoy AbStraicf No 474_ in the Ofy
of _ uthJake, Tarrant County, TCXQ::, WK11 being ON of I.0
7 Upf a portion of I-ot 2, Mock A of Crmmrrce flu9Irles.5
P6A on addition to the City ')f 5outhlake us -?rwwn on Me
?ror ecatdecr in Vofumc 31915-214 cl Pi3q�- 60 of the 010
fec S of Tdrrant C:CIUMy, rexcJy:
BF.O f,Flf+Jd.. at a r j,? inch suer rud set for r.urncr r7t fr►a
infe otion of tho current 5041th i jght-• CfI-• �rcry fine of
SaU raker BcnilevOM (rM 1709, a vorioble wroth
rrgh af•-wwy) with the: wn�l F hf-of-rt]y Jirrrr 01 C0rlr,mrrr-c
Str j n 5!� fool wide rirjh1- of •- w0y ). at. dNsr-rib] d in
Aqf J�ldgrrlrrlt dfitnlr_r} irti Cfiutie No ?,S� T:rft•5.31 •err} stYfcri
the tote ct;f FCXUS and 74r•rvrnf County, laxctis, vs ,fur U
Gf Y. efaf, and J' uCord�id ir+ Valurrre 1`0764 at Page J 44,1
of f ood Racnfdn of Tarrnnl Coun1Y, Texas:
7Hf_
.f Seyulri Q i je:f1. S'.� roirl. JU 96C.
f 1`30, OZ-1- 03IM"g .yard
Sou
1uke 6t+u4rjverral urtc! clior►4 IfFn, mast
JinC of yr:id
feat tan 112-lnc.ii
Gar,
*rcn Street. o divlvni;e of 93.96
sle
rod ftr.t for turner ut the troliginn;ng t3f a cufe tv
the
eght, tarrving ci G£ntr'of angfe of Q!S
Jcg. Of rnrn. 28
sec
ri rddiuc drsFarnGr of *V17.00 feal,
o I Ghord distdrrcf:
ci
23 M Icrl- pnd u chnta henrirly 01
4 t uth 04 (leg 02
rnld.
22
JH
C� xoutherfy rj)onrj said curve to the;
r,ghl, on arc
diencc
Of 2N 7t fcrl •-rr1ch
sl4al rod 50 for
'
TH
CF_ SOaritr rJ Y ring.
2 �J rnerr. 0f3
ye r„ ! ozl. G v+ltrfll U►1 Q
orcr
9ui rJ +•burl Jinn.
of
209. 70 fart t L► 13
inch eloel rod sort
for rorndf,
rM
4EX South Bb deg_
T7 min. Jf
cr.. IAler:l, a1bJ]Orting did
erce Street_ a dlatooet of 414.77 feet tP v chistlkrd
`X
sel rem cc+rnnr on
Ihr west line
of said Oddition and
bel
on thn amri irne
of v froet of
Iand convip"d It-
Sh
gard 7 rrata s t imilod
Flar tnerrsihiP
as -tho *ri in a do.+d rrr.or do t!
irr
rumrl 1.30L}r of Pe2ge 0446 of
thr. Dberl Records of J'orrarit
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-073 Page 3
Resolution No.01-056
Page 4
TFI ENii* J4%pr t h 01 dog. 29 rain 16 ge c. fta f . gilunq the,
ror"Mi n line between Paid addition Qnd sepW Shim Ord
tract. distoncr of 32AJ5 fej*t to c -chi!p led set for i
carry are the prewuusly s¢iad stru{ti right —of —Way has -of
Scut ko SoWevard, and being on a curve to Ow.. 1- f !
havih a CeMrar em41le of 03 d*9 45 ruin 56 sec.. a
rodlu di s tOnse of f . 9 74.$6 ("I. a thorC distance of
12� fe0f, and a che%rd hearing of Soijttf A9 dog. .57, min
47 � . -rdst;
THEN a03terly Uioriq t1ae !TOi.d sv.z(h line ur ;ovahlnke
l�cru�rir r d i' ho f orrowirig;
vtar+y alone) -.cjid rurVe to me arrf ar3 Ole: do-VrACP
129.19 feet to a conceela nionurrieni foiond for
th .67 deg 75 mill- 1.3 icon- Er)40. ,i ditstonrg of
. r -3 tr. of try n conrre t e rnonuman t 1o,rnd for r. omet ;
r1h $:5 cicq. 19 ,r►in. W see. Fasl, a distaoc;6 of
2.7.3 feet to th-p POINT OF bEGPJNfNG;
OM4 y+ tooniog .�.0 f) rrr.res Qr 1.12.032 squora feel of foot!
more ff r
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-073 Page 4
Resolution No.01-056
Page 5
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-073 Page 5
Resolution No.01-056
Page 6
EXHIBIT LB"
9
�
�
job p
it 14
pyhiji 9kp1111i € g 9 �} •6° 4
{�S iC E b� � !q g�EtlE dig
Ifni,
k�Yk• � I I�! � I
kky
' A I
xa
_____________ I
[BMIT
Iyll
tlgl tl i IaEi gw _ a �.: �I f l c I( I{ l� I {'i t y�
JI I n�Y i e .V-P --• •-• I S� I I,, ejt `,Jii. 3
l AF A(1 ... Ill
I �
' 5p
I ,
-- I i —
0
-- --- ani's gag
Ll
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-073 Page 6
Resolution No.01-056
Page 7
EXHIBIT "C"
This page reserved for the approved City Council motion.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-073 Page 7
i
City of Southlake
Department of Plannin!
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: = ZA01-076
PROJECT: The Clariden School
REQUEST: The Clariden School is requesting approval of a site plan for construction of a private
school.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing
2. Consider site plan approval.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plans and Support Information
(D)
Site Plan Review Summary
(E)
Developer Comments
(F)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(G)
Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(H)
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Tara Brooks (481-2079)
Case No.
ZA01-076
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: The Clariden School
PURPOSE: The purpose of this plan is obtain site plan approval for construction of a
private school.
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the west side of North White Chapel Boulevard
approximately 1,400' south of Bob Jones Road. It is part of the plat of the
Clariden Ranch Subdivision. The properties to the south, west, and north are
zoned "SF-lA" Single Family Residential District. To the east, across North
White Chapel Boulevard is Bob Jones Park.
HISTORY: -Preliminary Plat for Clariden Ranch was approved by City Council on
1/16/01.
-Rezoning and Concept Plan for Clariden School were approved by City
Council on 05115101.
-Final Plat for Lot 7, Block 1, Clariden Ranch was approved by P&Z on
08/23/01.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The property is legally described as a portion of Tracts 1 and IA, situated in
the W. Mills Survey, Abstract No. 877, being 23.050 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "CS" Community Service District
uses limited to a private school.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: The Thoroughfare Plan recommends that North White Chapel Boulevard be
ultimately designed as a two (2) lane undivided collector (C2U-70' R.O.W.)
with 16' travel lanes and a 2' curb and gutter section. Adequate R.O.W.
exists to accommodate the ultimate cross-section. A C2U roadway is
designed to have a maximum service volume of 8,400 vehicle trips per day
and still maintain a level of service D. White Chapel Boulevard is currently
operating at a level of service of B. This section of White Chapel Road has
not received funding in the City's Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for
improvements.
Roadway Network
North White Chapel Boulevard is currently a two (2) lane collector roadway
with 35 feet of pavement width and bar ditches. A condition of approval of
the Concept Plan was that the school would build a left turn lane through the
frontage of their property, on North White Chapel Boulevard.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-076 Page 1
A planned roadway leading to the recently approved Clariden Ranch
subdivision (Clariden Ranch Road) will be located just south of the site. This
will be a local residential road with 24' of pavement.
Current Traffic Counts
Traffic counts on North White Chapel Boulevard from Dove Street to Bob
Jones Road are as follows (See Table 1):
Table #1
The current traffic counts on North White Chapel Boulevard:
24hr
North Bound B (827)
South Bound SB 828
NB
Peak A.M. (55) 10a.m.- I I a.m.
Peak P.M. 122 5 .m.-6 .m
SB
Peak A.M. (96) 7a.m-8a.m.
Peak P.M. (88) 7 .m.-8 .m.
Source: City of Southlake 2001 Traffic Count Report
Traffic counts on T.W. King from Kirkwood Drive to Bob Jones Road are as
follows (See Table 2):
Table #2
The current traffic counts on T.W King.:
24hr
North Bound NB 2,720
South Bound SB (2670
NB
Peak A.M. 109) 8a.m.-9a.m.
Peak P.M. (313) 6 .m.-7 .m
SB
Peak A.M. 385 7a.m-8a.m.
Peak P.M. 162 6 .m.-7 .m.
Source: City of Southlake 2001 Traffic Count Report
Start and Dismissal Times of the School
Morning Start: 8:00 a.m. Middle and High School
8:30 a.m. Preschool and Elementary School
Afternoon Dismissal: 12:00 noon 1/2 of Preschool
3:00 p.m. 1/2 of Preschool
3:15 Elementary School
3:30 Middle and High School
5:45 Extended Daycare
Enrollment Projections
The initial number of students on campus is estimated to be 200 and will
include preschool through Middle School. Ultimate enrollment is projected
to be 630 students, including 160 high school students.
Traffic Impact
Staff has projected the following traffic impact on the surrounding roadway
network during peak traffic times (See Table #3).
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-076 Page 2
Table #3
Traffic Impact on Adjacent Street
During Peak Traffic Hours (7:00-8:00 a.m. & 5:00-6:00 p.m.) of
the Adjacent Street Traffic (Ultimate Build-Out-630 Students)
Start Time Students x Avg. Rate Total Trips In Out
8:00 AM
240 x .92
221
139
82
8:30 AM
390 x .92
359
226
133
Dismissal Students x Avg. Rate Total Trips In Out
Noon
85 x .64
18
18
24
3:00 P.M.
60 x .64
17
17
22
3:15 P.M.
144 x .64
62
62
82
3:30 P.M.
154 x .64
66
66
88
5:45 P.M.
1 26 x .64
11
11
15
336
Source: Planning Department/ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 6`h Edition
Total Daily Vehicle Trips
Staff has projected that this site will generate approximately 1,000 vehicle
trips per day. Nearly 100% of trips generated from the site will be primary
trips; therefore, it is projected that approximately 1,000 new trips will be
added to the adjacent roadway system if the site is approved.
2025 Modeled Traffic Volumes
The North Central Texas Council of Governments' Transportation
Department projected that 24-hour traffic volumes in 2025 along N. White
Chapel Boulevard will be 7,802 trips per day. However, the model likely
assumed that the subject tract would be developed residentially. It is
estimated that if this tract is developed residentially, the site will add
approximately 200 trips per day unto the surrounding roadways.' As
mentioned above, staff has projected that the school site will generate
approximately 1,000 vehicle trips. White Chapel Boulevard's ultimate design
can handle up to 8,400 vehicle trips per day and still function at a level of
service D.
Carter and Burgess has conducted a Traffic Impact Analysis for the Clariden
School. The findings of the study concluded that the intersection analyses
indicates no significant impact is anticipated to the level of service at the
intersections with the addition of the school traffic, either in 2002 or 2010.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-076 Page 3
Overview Internal Circulation
The entrance to the school site will be from the northern drive along White
Chapel Boulevard. This drive will connect to a loop drive on site. The exit
from the school site will be from the southern drive that accesses onto
Clariden Ranch Road. The drives entering and exiting the site are double
lanes. The arrows on the concept plan below indicate the internal traffic flow
on site (See Figure # 1).
Figure # 1
WATER & SEWER: There is an existing 12" water line on the east side of North White Chapel
Boulevard and an existing 8" sanitary sewer line on the west side of North
White Chapel Boulevard.
ESTIMATED IMPACT
FEES*:
Table # 1
Water $24,534.05 (assumes 14" water and 1-2"
irrigation)
Wastewater $11,582.40 assumes 14" meter
Roadway $16,277(Roadway Service Area 3
• Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shown above only
represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department.
Case No.
ZA01-076
Attachment A
Page 4
P&Z ACTION: September 6, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No.
4, dated August 31, 2001, allowing requested variances.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated August 31, 2001. The
following variances need council action:
• Ord. 480, Section 35.6.b.1 requires 278 parking spaces for this site. Ord.
480, Section 43.9.b allows City Council to grant a reduction of no more
than 10% due to the residential adjacency. The applicant has provided
260 spaces. A variance request letter is attached (see Attachment E.)
• Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.l.c. requires all facades within 400' of a
property zoned or designated residential to meet horizontal and vertical
articulation requirements. The rear wall of the Arts building does not
meet the horizontal or vertical articulation requirements. The side walls
of the Administration building do not meet the vertical articulation
requirements. A variance request letter is attached (see Attachment E.)
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-076 Page 5
Vicinity Map
Clariden School
1000 0 1000 2000 Feet
W
Case N o.
ZA01-076
N
E
Case No. Attachment B
ZA01-076 Page 1
snd VD M3N VOd NVId 3115
wa.,
Case No.
ZA01-076
I
F
F
M
k
JOIN .
g� �� �•
F
F
b
�Spp � -•
2
c
R R�Rc
_
F
p
Eye
r
gg
P
CD
lT) • $ ..............-1«
1'
z $
(D
gg
d@�
y
a
i
LO
a
*12
_._�} � __y--�=-_ --- .{t♦♦♦���r ,``,, I it • �� ` • • tl , i�
v
1;
3 awAyL/K 0 yµl A M a
Attachment C
Page 1
lLilelll
§ �a
�I�O � r11� r1•F0 � 7�7111r Y� 7 0 rr0017
sndMVD NGN VOd Nrld 31Is
r �T
::lQ
vim!°
I
5/20/01 6.37:09 PM \\FW1 F11\VOL1\APPS\CADNET\OUEUE\A6100_7.act 0:\PLOT\HP81O0_7\SP3.AHS
I-^
.x
i
r
Case No. Attachment C
ZA01-076 Page 2
OM W=UWVAM1
I R ;� � � iYt7lOt�tOtr711wYYr7A�00'�7 g
Y
§
i@ �d SfldMVD IA3N HOd HVId 3118 g a
u�t°I�
g
y
miga Pam �
�
8120101 6:37:23 PM\\FW1_F11\VOL1\APPS\CADNMOUEUE\A8100_7.ac/ 0:\PLOT\HP8100_7\SP4.AHS
Case No.
ZA01-076
Attachment C
Page 3
i 1
(§
F`
ull
�1...1OII.�.O....111Y.�....t...f.
snawyo IM3N !!Od NrId 3115 $
1°OY�
b
• y�
8/20/01 6:37:35 PM \\FW1 F11\VOL1\MPS\CAONET\OUEUE\A8100_7.pcf 0:\PLOT\HP81 O0_7\SP5.AHS
R
Case No. Attachment C
ZA01-076 Page 4
ww wwL'w�uw
wrr,• sw wwne � �>.,•�o �r • w �o ri
; 5 sndAVO IIA3N HOd NVId 3118
call
wl
100 ■
$�
4 i
E : € a
I
lMIN
I ra rr rA I
I rw I
I zo.c I
r J L- l
I I
I 4 I
I � I
I I
I I
1
I REAR
rJ
I I
I I
I I
L" — — — — — — — — — — —
8/20/01 6:37:39 PU \\FW1_F11\VOLT\APPS\CADNET\OUEUE\A8100_7.Qc/ 0:\PLOT\NP8100_7\SP6ANS
N
O �
CV
CD
Q
0:4
v
O
Case No. Attachment C
ZA01-076 Page 5
llar
�91r11R1Y YI.7•UMI011
1 SndV4VO M3N aOd Nrld 311E
•
r • p
cc
o'
N
O
C.D
Q
I
A
oon M■■
8/20/01 6:37:52 PM\\FW1_F11\VOL1\APPS\CAONET\OUEUE\A8100_7.g0 O:\PLOT\HP81O0_7\SP7.AHS
Case No. Attachment C
ZA01-076 Page 6
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA01-076 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 08/31/01
Project Name: Site Plan — Clariden School
APPLICANT: ARCHITECT:
The Clariden School
1325 N. White Chapel Blvd.
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 817-481-7597
Fax: 817-424-5561 Attn: Charlane Baccus
Carter and Burgess
777 Main Street
Fort Worth. TX 76102
Phone: (817) 735-6281
Fax: (817) 735-6148 Attn: Eric Claycamp
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/20/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT TARA A. BROOKS AT (817) 481-2079.
General Development Standards Applies Comments
Corridor Overlay Regulations
N
Residential Adjacency
Y
See Comment No. 3
Building Articulation
Y
See Comment No. 3
Masonry Standards
Y
Complies
Impervious Coverage
Y
Complies
Bufferyards
Y
Complies
Interior Landscape
Y
Complies
Driveways
Y
Complies
Lighting
Y
Complies
278 parking spaces are required. Only 260 are shown. Due to residential adjacency, a 10%
parking reduction may be requested. A variance letter is attached
2. In the data summary chart, correct the number of provided parking spaces. 260 spaces are
shown. Do not count the parallel spaces in the parking computation.
3. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.l.c.
on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the building within 400' of a
property zoned or designated residential. An articulation chart for the two buildings that are not in
compliance are attached. A variance letter is attached
4. Coordinate the location of the crosswalk with the Parks and Engineering Departments.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-076 Page 1
Informational Comments:
* The applicant should be aware that the portion of Clariden Ranch Road on the approved final
plat for Lot 7, Block 1 Clariden Ranch, Phase III, and the left turn lane on North White Chapel
Boulevard must be constructed prior to the issuance of a C.O.
* The parallel parking spaces that are shown are for overflow parking for special events only.
These spaces are shown in the drop-off/pick-up lane.
* The proposed site does not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage
of 65% for the "CS" Zoning District. The impervious coverage area percentage of this is
approximately 32.5%.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee.
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that
all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire
lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements.
NACOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\MEMO\2001CASES\01-076SP.DOC
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 01-076 Page 2
Arts Buildin
Front -facing:
Southeast lWall
ht=l
12
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Max. wall
length
36
22
-39%
Yes
36
20
-44%
Yes
Min. artic.
offset
2
12
500%
Yes
2
3
50%
Yes
Min. artic.
length
5
16
220%
Yes
5
20
300%
Yes
Rear - facing
Northwest
Wall ht=
18
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Max. wall
length
54
42
-22%
Yes
54
42
-22%
Yes
Min. artic.
offset
3
24
700%
Yes
3
2
-33%
No
Min. artic.
length
10
9
-10%
No
10
9
-10%
No
Right -facing:
Northeast
Wall ht=
12
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Max. wall
length
36
36
0%
Yes
36
36
0%
Yes
Min. artic.
offset
2
4
100%
Yes
2
6
200%
Yes
Min. artic.
length
9
24
167%
Yes
9
24
167%
Yes
Left - facing:
Southwest
Wall ht=
12
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Max. wall
length
36
36
0%
Yes
36
36
0%
Yes
Min. artic.
offset
2
4
100%
Yes
2
6
200%
Yes
Min. artic.
length
9
24
167%
Yes
9
24
167%
Yes
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 01-076 Page 3
Admin Building
Front -facing:
South
lWall ht=
1 12
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Max. wall
length
36
30
-17%
Yes
36
15
-58%
Yes
Min. artic.
offset
2
12
500%
Yes
2
9
350%
Yes
Min. artic.
length
7
15
114%
Yes
5
11
120%
Yes
Rear - facing
North
Wall ht=
19
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Max. wall
length
57
40
-30%
Yes
57
11
-81%
Yes
Min. artic.
offset
3
25
733%
Yes
3
7
133%
Yes
Min. artic.
length
10
10
0%
Yes
3
10
233%
Yes
Right - facing:
East
Wall ht=
12
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Max. wall
len th
36
25
-31%
Yes
36
87
142%
No
Min. artic.
offset
2
10
400%
Yes
2
6
200%
Yes
Min. artic.
length
6
12
100%
Yes
6
6
00-.
Yes
Left - facing:
West
wall ht=
12
Horizontal articulation
Vertical articulation
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Required
Provided
Delta
Okay?
Max. wall
length
36
25
-310-.
Yes
36
87
142%
No
Min. artic.
offset '
2
10
400%
Yes
2
6
200%
Yes
Min. artic.
,length
6
12
100%
Yes
6
2
-67%
No
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 01-076 Page 4
Carter -Burgess
August 20. 201N
Planning and Zoning Commission
City Of Southlake
1400 Main Sireet
Southlake. Texas 76092
Reference: 1larianee of Articulation Ordinance for The Administration Building
The Gladden School. Southlake, Texas
Dear Cornmissloners:
777 Nain 81rec1
Fas %Vta ,. Yu -as 76102
P.O. Box 901458
far w,lerlin, Tuxes 76101.2058
Now: 817.736.6ra00
rax. a i 7.735,8 t se
w�w.c•b.ca
We raspactfutly request variance from the City Or(finanee No 460-C Articulaaion of Building Facades for
the Administration Building of the Clariden School project for the following reasons:
1. This is a five -building project on one site. The four other buildings comply %with the ordinance.
The requested variance is for one building, the Administration Building.
2. The Administration Building is located near the cenler ai the site, and is surrounded on two sides
by the other classroom buildings. The ground level walls of the Administration buildng eompIV
with the ordinance; the metal roofed and glass clerestory located 21 feei above the ground In the
center of the roof structure does not comply. (See elevation attached).
3. Due to the location on the site, the Admi6stration clerestory will not be completely visible from the
property line on adjacent residential properties. From the White Chapel Road; side, the elevation
is part of heavily articulated, multi -angled, live building facade. To comply with the City ordinance
will make the five building facade less articulated and variable, and more repetitious. The
clerestory is form breaking vertical element unlike any of the other buildings, and at the same
lime reminiscent of the cupolas on the other buildings. The intent of the ordinance is to add
residential character to non-residential properties, W ith 1he use -of the clerestory we believe the
project is more residential like than vrrthout.
4. The glass and metal roof clerestory strengthens the design intent of the Administration building.
The clerestory introduces natural light to the center of the building corridor and it also
distinguishes this building from the others, making the building appear more "adult" and business-
like. Reducing or eliminating the clerestory will detract form the architectural appeal of the
building, and the project as a whole.
.5. TKe architectural clerestory Is nehher unusual nix incompatible vfdh surrounding residential
architecture. The use of glass window above the cave line is common in contemporary
residential design.
We again ask you to consider this project favorably. Please call me, Eric Claycamp, at Carter & Burgess.
Fort Worth if you have any queslions. toy number is (817) 735-7132. Thank you,
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
Eric A, Claycamp
Project Manager
FACAps
=8401)2.1_02
CC: CorrCspentic�ee
RECO AUG 2 0 2,1
Comr b bwgess. Inc. Corler & Bo-gess Consubon-s, Inc. Nixo-i & laird Arch lcm/2ng'neers, P.C. Nixon a Laird krch,lesrs/f,ygrneers, Ind. CAN Na—de, Inc.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-076 Page 1
„_, oar27i2001 09:36 FAX 817 735 0064 CARTER do UURGRSS aD02
CIS-Bur+sm
AugUss 27, 2041
Plaxufring and Zoning Commisslon
City of Sbutblake
1400 Main Street
Southlake, Texas 7$O92
Werencs: Varianve of CW-Streel Parking Ordinance
The ClarMen School, Southlalter Texas
Dear Commissioners:
777 W-q Epp•
560 V%.Ih, raxua M-02
PO Bow 90,050
Fort Were, 7axos 7678F-2056
o'honu: 617.795.-MO
Fuca. 107."4 5&jls
W"-.e•b.eom
We reaperALItly requasl variance from tho City Ordinance No 480-C, section 35— Off -Street
Parking Requirernants, for a 10% raducelion of the number 4f off-street parking spaces for the
Clariden School project for the toltowirng reasons:
1. The paWng count listed on shoat SP 1 in the site plan submissbon includes 26 parallel
parldng spaces. These spaces are adjacent to the fire lane, and stop at ills requf hell
stacking depth from N. White Chapel Blvd. The entry drive hoe a u66th of 34 feet, which
consiats of 24feet for the lire Cane and 10 feet for chars to move over and gat out okthe
way when Tire trucks and other safety vehioles are needed at the buildings. This 10 foot
wide strip will also aocommodate parallel parking per the City's requirements, but will not
6e painted or stti)ed as such. The parallel parking will only be used during apeow
events, to handle the additional 22 parldng space raquirem4ts per the ordinance
2. TI)o 26 parallel parking spaces expAod the required 22 by 4 additional spaces.
3. By grandnp this vaderwe request, the additional 26 parallel puking spiRoes will (educe
The impact on the surrounding residential propertles and Bob Jones Park. It will allow
the parents send guests of The Clariden School to park on thsir Mn prop” and not on
the street or at 0* park,
We again ask you to coneider this project favorably, Please Call ripe, Eric Claycarnpr at Carter &
Burgm, RvrtWorth, if you have erey questions, My number is (817) 735-7132. Thank you.
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
EryftA. Clay►
PWJe0 Manager
EACAps
CC QGre:por�d4npp
Ce wr & 6�rgou, Ire. Cnrinr & Ww4vi4 <Lut-41anlb, IrK. Nhwo & L hL1 r%hiP VFnn1nreri, P.C. Ni=n S Lpind r�r(hilOSMfllgi'a:lh, ex. C&8 KcgWq, I.r.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 01-076 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owners
(M. Clariden School
Property Owner
Zoning
Land Use Description
Acreage
1. Southlake-Solana
1. SF-lA
1. Low Density Residential
1. 38.65
2. City of Southlake
2. AG
2. Public Parks/Open Space
2. 117.86
3. R.Galvin
3. AG
3. Low Density Residential
3. 31.12
4. B. Lamoreaux
4. AG
4. Low Density Residential
4. 31.87
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-076 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Clariden School
Notices Sent: Three (3)
Responses: None
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-076 Page 1
4
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-078
PROJECT: Lot 10, Block 1, Southlake Estates
REQUEST: Phyllis Benton is requesting approval for a zoning change.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Consider I" reading for zoning change and concept plan.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plan and Support Information
(D)
Concept Plan Review
(E)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(F)
Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(G)
Ordinance No. 480-375
(H)
11 X17 copy of plan (Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086)
Case No.
ZA01-078
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Phyllis Benton
PURPOSE: The applicant desires to subdivide her property into two lots. This will
create a lot less than 1-acre in size. The purpose of this request is to
rezone her property in order to build another house.
PROPERTY SITUATION: 615 Love Henry Court
HISTORY: A final plat for the Southlake Estates subdivision was approved by the
City Council on January 25, 1972.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10, Block 1, Southlake Estates, being 1.805 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1 A" Single Family Residential District
REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-30" Single Family Residential District
P&Z ACTION: August 23, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review
Summary No. 1, dated August 17, 2001.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: September 4, 2001; Approved to Table (7-0) to the September 18,
2001, City Council Meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS: A plat revision is being processed concurrently. The plat is included
as the Concept Plat for this rezoning request. Attached is Concept
Plan Review No. 2, dated August 31, 2001.
NACommunity Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2001cases\01-078Z.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-078 Page 1
Vicinity Map
(.. Lots 1OR-1 & 1OR-2, Block 1
Southlake Estates
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
►iA
N
S
E
Case No. Attachment B
ZA01-078 Page 1
!
i
('
t 11 7�
6 Z o
< $$
y �'� �
���
m 2 b
°r ! ti
c
e MI
e.
fr
s
all,
p�
J
E_�yr-- � I �•j
Peou 9180 /,PNS
Case No.
ZA01-078
Attachment C
Page 1
PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA01-078
Review No.: Two
Date of Review: 08/31/01
Project Name: Concept
Plan — Lots 1OR-1 and 10R-2,
Block 1, Southlake Estates
APPLICANT:
Michael and Phyllis Benton
615 Love Henry Court
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 481-2688
Fax: (817) 831-4336
SURVEYOR: A.P. Survey Company
Jim Shaner or David Pollard
1903 Central Drive, Suite 305
Bedford, TX 76021
Phone: (817) 267-1249
Fax: (817) 267-0148
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/27/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086.
Provide a separate metes and bounds description for Lot 1 OR-2.
Informational Comments
* A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" indicating that there are no delinquent taxes owed on the subject
property from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the
r County records. A copy of this information may be obtained from the Tarrant county Tax
Assessor/Collector's Office located at 100 E. Weatherford St. in Ft. Worth (across from the old
red courthouse). There is a service charge of $10 per account for this certificate. For more
information contact the Assessor/Collector's office at (817) 884-1103.
Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original
signatures.
* Original signatures and seals will be required on three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat.
Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x I V or 14" paper) with
original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink,
other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat.
A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The
Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication
requirements and fees, off -site sewer extensions, off -site drainage and utility easements and
impact fees.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-078 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Lot 10, Block 1 Southlake Estates
Owner
Zoning
1. M. Nichols
1.
SF -IA
2. M. Wayland
2.
SF -IA
3. E.Owen
3.
SF-30A
4. E.Owen
4.
SF-20A
Case No.
ZA01-078
Land Use
Acreage
1.
Low Density Residential
1.
1.90
2.
Low Density Residential
2.
2.00
3.
Low Density Residential
3.
1.41
4.
Low and Medium
4.
9.543
Density Residential
Attachment E
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Response
Lot 10, Block 1, Southlake Estates
NOTICES SENT: Eight (8)
RESPONSES: None received within the 200' notification area
Two (2) responses were received from outside the 200'
notification area:
• Joanne Fuller, 570 Love Henry Court, Southlake TX, opposed,
" I feel that splitting the lot on the corner will disrupt the
appearance of our neighborhood. We purchase our home
because of the size of the lots and rural atmosphere. An
additional home on the corner will enclose the open feeling we
enjoy." (Received August 23, 2001)
• See attached letter received during the Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting held August 23, 2001.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-078 Page 1
Planning and Zoning Commission
August 23, 2001
To Whom ft May Concern:
In the current zoning case ZA01-078 we offer our support for this
transaction. We have no objections to this matter.
Thank you,
John and Kira Campbell
495 Love Henry
Southlake TX
817 329 8840
r, .2--3 E
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-078 Page 2
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.480-375
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480,
AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 10,
SOUTHLAKE ESTATES, AND BEING
APPROXIMATELY 0.791 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY
AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
FROM "SF -IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT TO "SF-30" SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS
ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER
PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE
ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE
SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS
HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its
Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article X1, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution
and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has
the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and
use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other
purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-078 Page 1
health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-1A" Single Family
Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-078 Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,
are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-078 Page 3
amended as shown and described below:
Being a portion of Lot 10, Southlake Estates, and being approximately 0.791 acres,
and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF-1A" Single Family
Residential District to "SF-30" Single Family Residential District.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance
with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general
welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and
the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the
streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the
community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration
among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses
and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-078 Page 4
land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued
violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under
such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-078 Page 5
LA
disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 92001.
Case No.
ZA01-078
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Attachment G
Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-078 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being a portion of Lot 10, Southlake Estates, and addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-75, Page 8, Plat Records, Tarrant
County, Texas, being approximately 0.791 acres.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-078 Page 8
EXHIBIT `B"
:�; �i +; to ,jj ,( iF: rL• r! 1. i�; E
EE!t +t tl t
It k,; .:! kt :
!', (( i •E � � trt � � , r IrE ,i ,
if o I} a ii►� [ i �� l�fl i 3 8 it a iiH i
E.
E;
�T
�
1 r -•r
I
�
I
I
S
PBOa WRO AP84S
d
... ..........
Case No.
ZA01-078
W
o
N
� <
� I
r
Z
<
o
N
ti
CV
C.D
Q
3
fill
C 7
6
Y
L
I
ai
Attachment G
Page 9
V
City of Southlake
DeDartment of PlanninLy
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-079
PROJECT: Lots 1OR-1 & 1OR-2, Southlake Estates
REQUEST: Phyllis Benton is requesting approval of a plat revision.
ACTION NEEDED: 1. Consider plat revision
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
(D) Plat Review Summary
(E) Surrounding Property Owner Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (817) 481-2086
Case No.
ZA01-079
01
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Phyllis Benton
PURPOSE: The applicant is proposing to subdivide her property into two residential lots.
The north lot is proposed to remain as "SF-lA". The south lot is proposed
as "SF-30". The request is dependent on rezoning the property to "SF-30"
Single Family Residential District.
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the southeast corner of Love Henry Court and
Shady Oaks Road.
HISTORY:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LAND USE CATEGORY:
CURRENT ZONING:
REQUESTED ZONING:
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Case No.
ZA01-079
A final plat for the Southlake Estates subdivision was approved by the City
Council on January 25, 1972.
Lot 10, Block 1, Southlake Estates, being 1.8 acres
Low Density Residential
"SF-lA" Single Family Residential District
"SF-30" Single Family Residential District on the southern lot only
Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Shady Oaks Drive to be a 2-
lane, undivided collector street with 64' of R.O.W. The applicant is required
to dedicate land for R.O.W. to equal 64'.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed Lot 1 OR-2 will have driveway access onto Shady Oaks Drive.
The lot will be required to provide an off-street maneuvering area to ensure
that vehicles will not back into the Shady Oaks Drive.
Shady Oaks Drive currently is a 2-lane, undivided collector street.
May, 2001 traffic counts on Shady Oaks Dr. (between W. Southlake
Blvd FM 1709 and Highland Dr.
24hr
North Bound 1,709
South Bound (SB) (1,593
NB
Peak A.M. 285 7-8 a.m.
Peak P.M. 168 3-4 p.m.
SB
Peak A.M. 210 8-9 a.m.
Peak P.M. 170 3-4 p.m.
Attachment A
Page 1
WATER & SEWER: There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer line that runs along the south side of
Love Henry Court. An easement has been provided to connect Lot 1 OR-2 to
the sanitary sewer line. A 12" water line exists along Shady Oaks Dr.
P&Z ACTION: August 23, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Plat Revision Review Summary
No. 3, dated August 17, 2001, adding north lot must meet SF -IA district
regulations.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: September 4, 2001; Approved to Table (7-0) to the September 18, 2001, City
Council Meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Revision Review Summary No. 4, dated August 31, 2001.
Approval of this plat revision is dependent on the approval of the "SF-30"
zoning request on the southern lot, case number ZAO1-078, being processed
concurrently.
NACommunity Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2001cases\01-079PR.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-079 Page 2
Vicinity Map
Lots 1 O R-1 & 1 Q R-2, Block 1
Southlake Estates
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
ON
0
Case No. Attachment B
ZA01-079 Page 1
,P3fj
As
ait
LO
=pa I
ee t7� •1 !f� :l� ilE ��
$!i, fit !il
Q
L
a '111A
F_
u
511�
t
.w
r
U
5-
r
nisi
0
`L t
r
uct ftS.t � �i
Flf°Fit
`• :ir`! if HI
_
R
Case No. Attachment C
ZA01-079 Page 1
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA01-079
Review No.: Four
Date of Review: 08/31/01
Project Name: Plat Revision —
Lots IOR-1 and 1OR-2,
Block 1, Southlake Estates
APPLICANT:
Michael and Phyllis Benton
615 Love Henry Court
Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 481-2688
Fax: (817) 831-4336
SURVEYOR: A.P. Survey Company
Jim Shaner or David Pollard
1903 Central Drive, Suite 305
Bedford, TX 76021
Phone: (817) 267-1249
Fax: (817) 267-0148
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/27/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086.
1. Add the deed record information (volume and page, DRTCT) to the owner's certificate.
2. Provide the standard approval block on the plat per appendix 9: Plat Revisions
Approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission
Date:
Chairman:
P&Z Secretary:
Approved by the City Council
Date:
Mayor:
City Secretary:
3. Provide a 40' building line along Shady Oaks for Lot 1 OR-1.
4. Show and dimension the R.O.W. for Shady Oaks from the centerline of the apparent existing
R.O.W. and the full width across Shady Oaks. The Master Thoroughfare Plan requires 64' of
R.O.W.
Informational Comments
The filing of this plat is dependent on appropriate zoning being placed on the lots.
* A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" indicating that there are no delinquent taxes owed on the subject
property from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the
County records. A copy of this information may be obtained from the Tarrant county Tax
Assessor/Collector's Office located at 100 E. Weatherford St. in Ft. Worth (across from the old
red courthouse). There is a service charge of $10 per account for this certificate. For more
information contact the Assessor/Collector's office at (817) 884-1103.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-079 Page 1
* Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original
signatures.
Original signatures and seals will be required on three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat.
Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with
original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink,
other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat.
A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The
Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication
requirements and fees, off -site sewer extensions, off -site drainage and utility easements and
impact fees.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-079 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owners
.. Lot IOR-1 & IOR-2, Block 1
Southlake Estates
Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1.
J. Peter
1.
SF -IA
1.
Low Density Residential
1.
2.13
2.
G. Fuller
2.
SF-lA
2.
Low Density Residential
2.
1.99
3.
M. Nichols
3.
SF-lA
3.
Low Density Residential
3.
1.90
4.
M. Wayland
4.
AG
4.
Low Density Residential
4.
5.59
5.
City of Southlake
5.
AG
5.
Medium Density
5.
2.825
Residential
6.
E. Owen
6.
SF-30A
6.
Low Density Residential
6.
1.50,
7.
E. Owen
7.
SF-20A
7.
Low and Medium
7.
8.955
Density Residential
8.
E. Owen
8.
SF-20A
8.
Medium Density
8.
2.747
Residential
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-079 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Response
Lot 10R-1 &IOR-2, Block 1, Southlake Estates
NOTICES SENT: Four (4)
RESPONSES: One (1) response was received from within the 200' notification area:
• Greg Fuller, 570 Love Henry Court, Southlake TX, opposed, "I feel that
splitting this approximately 2 acre lot will lead to an inconsistent look and feel
to the Love Henry neighborhood. This will likely have a negative affect on
our property values." (Received August 23, 2001)
Two (2) response was received from outside of the 200' notification area:
• Joann Hardy, 455 Love Henry Court, Southlake TX, opposed, " Bought into a
small neighborhood w/ 10 homes, 10 large lots. Don't want a precedence set
where we can all subdivide our lots. I am adamantly opposed to this. I want
to be a good neighbor but this is not acceptable. There will also be too much
traffic with a driveway onto Shady Oaks, along with the entrance to the new
subdivision. Too much congestion at this corner."
(Received August 17, 2001)
• Francis Nathan, 535 Love Henry Court, Southlake TX, opposed, "This will
reduce the value of the properties in the subdivision. We are a 2 acre lot per
home. If this is allowed all of us must be allowed to subdivide the entire
subdivision. This subdivision is one of the few in Southlake that is spacious.
I strongly object this request." (Received August 23, 2001)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-079 Page 1
City of Southlake
• • DeDartment of PlanninLy
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-077
PROJECT: Pecan Acres 110-1" Zoning Change
REQUEST: On behalf of James W. Baker, Drews Realty Investments is requesting approval of
a zoning change and concept plan.
ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading for zoning change and concept plan request.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plans and Support Information
(D)
Concept Plan Review Summary
(E)
Developer Comments
(F)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(G)
Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(H)
Ordinance No. 480-377
(I)
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086)
Case No.
ZA01-077
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: James W. Baker
APPLICANT: Drews Realty Investments
PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to receive a zoning change and concept plan
approval for office development.
PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM
1709) approximately 410' east of the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway.
HISTORY: -July 3, 1979 City Council approved a Plat Showing for two lots on 25
acres of land.
-February 22, 1984 City Council approved a Plat Revision for a subdivision
of Lot 2 into three lots.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: This property is legally described as being a portion of Lots 2A and 213, and
Lot C, Block 1, Dilg Place Subdivision, being 8.023 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential
REQUESTED ZONING: "O-l" Office District
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan
The MTP recommends Southlake Blvd to have 130' of right-of-way.
Adequate R.O.W. exists for this road.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed site will have one (1) right-in/right-out access onto E.
Southlake Blvd. The right-in/right-out drive lines up with Foxborough
Drive across E. Southlake Blvd. Common access drives are shown to
connect into the property to the west for access to Byron Nelson Pkwy and
to the office development to the east for access to a full access driveway.
E. Southlake Blvd is a five lane, undivided thoroughfare with a
continuous, two-way, center left turn lane. The roadway will ultimately
be widened to a seven lane roadway. Adequate R.O.W. has been
dedicated.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-077 Page 1
WATER & SEWER:
ESTIMATED IMPACT
FEES*:
P&Z ACTION:
STAFF COMMENTS
Case No.
ZA01-077
May, 2001 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 (between Carroll Ave. and
Byron Nelson Pkw .
24hr
West Bound (WB) (23,281
East Bound (EB) (21,176
WB
Peak A.M. 1,220 11-12 a.m.
Peak P.M. 2,168 5-6 p.m.
EB
Peak A.M. 2,057 7 - 8 a.m.
Peak P.M. 1,292 12-1 p.m.
Traffic Impact
Use
Sq. Ft.
Vtpd*
AM-
IN
AM-
OUT
PM -IN
PM -
OUT
Office
63,500
699
87
12
16
79
Pathways Master Plan
The Southlake Pathways Master Plan recommends an eight (8) foot paved,
multi -use trail along the south side of E. Southlake Blvd. The Plan also
proposes a natural, multi -use trail along the west side of the development.
The natural trail will connect into S. Carroll Avenue near Continental
Boulevard.
A 10" and an 8" sanitary sewer line exist on either side of the property. 12"
water line runs along the south side of E. Southlake Blvd.
Water
$41,633.54
assumes 7 - 2" simple meters
Wastewater
$25,944.58
assumes 7 - 2" simple meters
Roadway
$51,000.66
assumes general office
* Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shown above only represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department.
August 9, 2001; Approved to Table (6-0) to the August 23, 2001, Planning
and Zoning Commission Meeting.
August 23, 2001; Approved to Table (6-0) to the September 6, 2001,
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
September 6, 2001; Approved (5-1) subject to Concept Plan Review
Summary No. 3, dated August 3, 2001, allowing requested variances.
Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated August 3, 2001. The
following variances need council action:
• All lots must have frontage on a public or private street.
• Stacking depth. The stacking depth required for this site is 100'.
• Spacing between drives on F.M. 1709. The minimum spacing is 250'
between a right-in/right-out drive and any other drives on FM 1709 (E.
Southlake Blvd).
Attachment A
Page 2
Vicinity Map
Pecan Acres
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
W
Case No.
ZA01-077
ON
E
Attachment B
Page 1
SigulA"d4f1ta
3,AviH1nos jo Aim
3DYIJ oil(
is3nMUD"NOZ s3sr
Z-0 1 1-0 UW NVIJ 1d30140:)
rvx:31 3,Av-Wun0G .40 )jo
7NI rD U3W 6M39CI
M
Nm"I eAM
Owl
0
FOXBORGUGH
0-
0
111,
L
H
T
W
j
Case No. Attachment C
ZA0I-077 Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA01-077 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 08/03/01
Project Name: Concept Plan — Pecan Acres (Dilg Place)
APPLICANT: Drews Realty Group
John Drews
580 Commerce Street, Suite 400
Southlake, TX 76092
PHONE: (817) 251-2258
FAX: (817) 416-8418
ENGINEER: Bury+partners, DFW, Inc.
Juan J. Vasquez, PE
5310 Harvest Hill Road, Suite 100
Dallas, TX 75024
PHONE: (972) 991-0011
FAX: (972) 991-0278
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/23/01 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086.
1. Show the building line along F.M. 1709 as 50' measured from the property line.
2. Clearly show, with shading or cross -hatches, the bufferyards (5', Type `A') required along Pecan
Creek Court frontage.
3. Common Access Easements must be provided for drives connecting to off -site properties. The
center drive, Pecan Creek Court, must be labeled as a Common Access Easement as well.
4. All lots must have frontage on a public or private street. (A variance has been requested.)
5. The following changes are needed regarding driveways:
a. Provide minimum depth for all points of ingress/egress to the site along FM 1709. The
stacking depth required for this site is 100 feet. The applicant is proposing 39 feet of
stacking depth. (A variance has been requested.)
b. Provide minimum spacing between drives along FM 1709. Label the distances between the
proposed driveway centerline to the nearest existing driveway centerlines off -site in.both
directions. The minimum spacing is 250' between the proposed right-in/right-out drive and
other access drives on FM 1709 (E. Southlake Blvd). The proposed drive is 290 feet from
the drive to the east and 209 feet from the drive to the west. The proposed drive will lineup
with Foxborough Drive across FM 1709. (A variance has been requested.)
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
Please be mindful that should individual tenants desire to sell alcoholic beverages that a specific use
permit must be processed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City
Council.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-077 Page 1
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building
plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not
be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap
Fees, and related Permit Fees.
This review is based on the "0-1" Zoning District Regulations.
This site falls within the applicability of the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations in Section 43, Part
II. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan, the applicant must
evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan must be submitted
and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a
building permit. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the
applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements:
• Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No.
557, as amended.
• Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended
• Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d,
Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as
amended.
• Spill -over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for
vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance
No. 480, as amended.
• Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544.
• Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-077 Page 2
Drews Realty Investments
Real Estate Investment and Development
July 1, 2001
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street
Southlake, Texas 76092
Re: Case No. ZA01-077
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Applicant requests the following variances for the above case:
As the Applicant intends to later further sub -divide the property into
additional lots, we request that the proposed drive from FM1709 that continues south
through the property be considered as sufficient to meet the Subdivision Ordinance
requirement that all lots have frontage on a public or private street (Note: all lots will
have frontage on this drive).
We request that the 100' stacking depth requirement be waived since
this site is being connected to existing drives in the properties to the east and west, the
alignment of which will not allow 100' stacking depth for the proposed drive from
FM 1709.
Per Staffs recommendation, we request a variance for spacing
between the proposed drive on the west in order to line up the drive with one across
the street.
Thank you for your consideration of these requests.
!L a$,
dilo I - I
c pr.rdg
0701.0ty re Caseft.ZA01-077
I L 0
580 Commerce Street, Suite 400 • Southlake, Texas 76092.9113 • B17.251 2258 • metro/817.329.1684 • fax1817,416 8418
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-077 Pagel
eg131 f28t11 11. 21 817-416-8416 PO4S REALTY TNVESTM PACE 82
Draws Realty Investments
R&W Est8(M i Westment Wed E)O"1oRf WMt
August 31, 2001
Planning And Zoviiug C.amoliwov
City 0f8authlakc
1400 Bain %vvt
Southlske,'fexas 76092
RE: Update os Com ZAOI-M and 7."I-l!9
Ladies and Gartkmen:
At the last mmOrg we were asked to eddrem beverel issues prier to Mlwl'ntg 10 the CoM7 mion
on SqAeMttj & Timse Wucs inebvded (1) rowing with SPIN, (2) detannin* th-. fmmltilk of
our Ord the adfismi: sand evnoes's aocomzrscdatjW the City's ;z� In husldmg a strtet *M
Byron Nelson Parkway. to Carroll Strect through both grepwics, sand (3) fAOX4 at aft=wjvts
to t& pruposed 'in -righter driveway CO Souliila * BMLkW4 for Pew Cre& Tbesa
bavc been fuwxUBd as sauows-
Last with SPIN to prcmpt our Concept Plan for their eangWkMiM- Addres®dug
D Concerns egresW by tsei lbws who live on the strom soutb of the ekmashxy whwl (across
ihv drainage charnrcl and xbool phygrt uWX -e n6reed (1) to plash trees along tbt aputhara
prvpc3dY line ao the hovoowners wiD tot be looking at ik back ofoffiae bugs. (2) to create
a ccwx6 1oemti m away from the south= bmAxlery for dwnp Wo (if a0owed by Ofditrarm) in
order to rachm now crested dwing C BOOiott, and (3)10 W1 i"W exterior Agwn !list shines
south toward their houv$ (again, to the o=rd allowed by OT;Jbooce} Tb= ncig hm Aieo
expressed concern about dw p ospeetive road between Byron Ncbun Arad C'arrotl. T?W xt=
rcpasstntetive stated ihcy ail have known aameih* would cvc%w&y be bu0t on dw sub}eet
pmpCdY with their rnaia corxetru being that their view and the rsoise ixr be add -cod wba)
davclopmcnt actually oepjrs.
Issues 0;*ed by other cltbz m ctcl , (1) the arcNdectsusl tbnmiG io be used £or 16c bwldito in
the &evclopnwrst wbieh 1 aThkdd would be s'unolwu to !hat mK4 for the cxisliatg VWW at
7"WWMn project (booWft us as dmjopers estabb'abg aFCbkecVntl controls for ail buildings
to be built now or iA the fturaC st Pecan OVA) sod (2) haw UVMV PbD* We astdaipOe, vsrauld
occupy ftse buildings when they arc fatally built out — I explained we ratR* a =xi=1m of
300 to 350 bwed on the low-demity pima ws have. I balkyo thin Wert the PiMWY ivml
raised. 0 of whkh seemod to be awwcmd to lire satisfaction of the c'rthmm in etendow. Notc,
there wcrc rya vonw= expressed about the driveway at Southlake Boulevm i or the !cession of
buildings next to the schoa". I,& sunru xa =, a was a very comatnxtive nu t4 with se►WW
gom zegestb= made by the tat=M (Smh as the scrccsung trees, dw"Cr tocari!, m'ed
that we plan to include in the devebpntrat.
580 CDmmsrxw SrrBK Suite IM S&Mlaks, Tons TCOO ftT7.251.22 $ taut tT.476.8416 r»MroMt7.3W-'$M
fEGO A 6 3o 12001
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-077 Page 2
28/31/2001 11.11 617-¢IS-8418 DREWS REAL7V IMESTM PAGE 03
Pknniug and Zuni* Co r�sion
August 31, 20t?I
Page 2
Roe@ arrow 1�1er and CAnvft
In looking at The &wjbality of jhe• ptoposed road, Charlie Thor= looked at $tc proxunity of tht
existing medusa errs on Byron Ncboia, north and south of the proposed erlrrance to the Byron
M son to Carroll road, and dncmlinW that thdv 1wa icm prevents an additiontd mdiam cur's
b64 tondo on BYmn Nelson for the pwposcd road Therefore, if the road is bur7t it would mat
to bAve its Byrom Nelson oDnrxxtim lacakcd sppro2dwottly in the Sadie location as the tAvtarg
rj&-iqx-r%U-out driveway on the pmperty between Tj= V&qc at Tinmyw and the taboo]
C"Fior won IN Property"). Assumiag This locaotim our tnig*om bane looked at what raped a
50-foot rigbl-of-way with a cwbbd and guncsod 31-foot road would have on the 'fin III
Property. in addition, they h$ve looked at the ire wa.K of the Qa the Pecan Creek proPcrtY•
Ba6wliy, the addhion of suds a road into those pbw nxwu ably redzx= lire usable busd on tho
Tim tm is] Property and rrrawn k impam the Fe= Greek property- Thk %aid, if the City
derides to include the propend road on the Thory ghfare Plata, wC -mild be jurparod 10 donate
the right.of-way for the road (and build the road when both projcets art: &-nWped) if the City
wM work with us *A setlack raq ts, bufitrr y%dx etc., and give ua oftMIM Impact Fee
relief up to the cost ofbail t the Toed. To m=mftdTt, wr are pfMwd to work whb the OtYif
it decides it wants this road burst.
R -ltz-R ht-Out D lbUke Sou
As yOd may rernaaber durorg the Public HearA g of these CBsas, Terry tiYi]kim 11 sxputs his
williu$tttss to grant a crxrss,aeeM easement so traffic Anw betwem his property to the east,
Feean Creek, and 1-w Village at Timmoru would be itlq MWA. In ftatberdixu"iom I k d with
Teary, he cxpWncd that bus willmgrreas to grate Ibis VWWn ettt Was based on bit asavn3ptian that
the right-irrrigM•otn drivv&W for Ptam Greek would be Wlt- other"4w, be is TM ir))=St is
gmt;ng the e&Rmx . Rb po*)an is urAcrsrarAAk mace all eastbomyd Pectut Creek traffic
would Iptly be ex mtg across hie property it time -era oa rigirt-4ut•r rt-ia driveway on [hc
Pecan Crier property. Attached is a letter fmm Terry xeewdim this iss►x. Wa tbW looked at
she fcasibe'k of not having aresss to T'eWs property and not havft the right-Ou►-aiRlrt-in
ddvcway ae propoatd. The mull would bo an traffic fbr bath `F w V'rttegc ar Tlmaarom and
pem Greek eraamg and exiting through the existing fullan-ri*t-out It the cast
Soud"re Boukvwd cidnum to The VMaga rtt Tkyormrk We are cxbrcmely c000eaned thm
would r+csult in sm unnh sit miion bemm that driveway (St the rup" of City Cc»UIKUI during
Concept Plmr Approval) was Witt to Mdmum sptxWk4dovs, thus resulftng in a driveway Cher -
while odcquatsly smi4 The Village at T-km con - was not db&ig to accommodate traffic
slow frost laid to 170 for both nie Visage at Tvauron sad v4wem property.
Fir these reasons, we Uok it is em mial that Ibc rigN-b-right-out driveway be inchxlod in the
Pegs CFeek developrstem. By having Lhe corabdrratioA of the rrqucstcd right-out-rWI-in
*iVeway far Posast Creek and wares to Terry's felt suvivc driveway, the M&rity of traffic
xvoveattim tom and Io Pecoo Creek would be UOVed east a 1U Village at T=5 A• fro 10 a
location that is a safer disc we from Byrm N.I m then the Village at T'ansrrom ddvewAY. We
see w ather practical soiutiau.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-077 Page 3
W13112001 11:21 917-416-8410 MEWS REALTY TWESTM PA15E 134
pkmaing aw ZMAP9 tw1i n
August 31, 2001
iW3
I- a Wly, this update wil be helpful to you in pepeaing for the contooaus� of tw Public
Rearing ncxt Thursday. In the centime, please let me know if you bave any questions or
CarruaMdx
SirbcctrlY,
Ja w
t
0831.PAZ re PC
AM 312001
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-077 Page 4
B8131 / 2001 11: 21 817-416-8418
e3/3112221 09:99 e374002420
Wyndham Properties, Ltd.
16 % S. Sotm m $Not
Sum 13e
SOorhwa.IX MIR
re+n mmm
IB P? O6.W0 Fox
Aup" 30,2001
Salsce Plyne
Plwm Director
City O(Soull"ke
DREk6 REALTY IRVASTM PAGE 05
WNWA►f PRGPERfIES RAGE 92
1tv 7AOI-077 Ctlmwpt Ptah Dmwa Remthy GmW. Ine_
I own the property located test of the above reiw noed cam. I Gave revirwed she oaacg4 Flm
u,tsetmtty psapoted, •tId hav! m,o abjection, to ttmet plan, I have al t wish W Drewe;md oeood to
Sm i a Common Aam;ess Eu mew to my &A avms driveway that is located 10 she east of my
buildup. lkwwm duff d* Augu►t 11, 1?6m tag and Z,onft mna ing. I heard cam diawniw
regatft $0 a irinmioa of t1m propoBed Rigbt in R*ht Out Divew ly mom to SmAhU s 81r'4.
As 1 e41W at the P&Z lrweeting, I would not be in agfoeme a wfsp thA proposal, Ile 1 da AM Wive
aW dthmxaX can handle the addltuaryl traffim:lhst would be plmwed upa it,
In thn P&Z manim op Augwv- 21, thcrs was some diecuseloa regatdbis a piopaW to locato a road
PMU to SoOVAko D1W. ifottt 4 Xelten Blvd. oast to Carroll Road. I Wisva rhst road would
SONG two R► 1mr, Arst it would IWW boner s"s to Saudlltke Blvd. at zantro➢ed Ietetmajom,
mid ra&m the m of driveway requeeta along Soud%Ww Vvd. Secoad, tWt matt would deg
*me ae s buflar between relidenW olmd bukup proprrfitl. It it A* bOW tb4 residential
dev4opmmt adiaeM to SoutbkAr Nvd. is irapprophate, Ind as trA flc lnclesM o04 tfiia
thorougkkvr the prothmb will 4mgyget wom. There heads to be a tra ihion besti<m a Bve(saga
toIm eevwm low) fo idler mW a rtsidemial devetopmcnm.
At 1 kavG provim* whored: Q I wOl agree to grant Mr Dnewx a commamt aaceu amnmew to my
driveway only it his property is gwmad At feast a Right In Riot Out Driveway caw Soumidabe
Blvd. wX6 v41 wvv flip mocifity of hie ttrzuw. R) I agm vdA the pmp wd 7oadway Ww*Aq
Syron NeWo Rfrd and Carols Rotd, tad I am v4lft to dwmm R.O.W. far Ow read.
Efyoa hivve any que6wt or if I can be of any help, plead ro.l fro to call rr4
L.1Yillon>�
RECD AUi- 312031
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-077 Page5
�I
Surrounding Property Owners
Pecan Acres
Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1.
Southlake-Foxborough Ltd
1.
C 1
1.
Office Commercial
1.
1.717
2.
Southlake-Foxborough Ltd.
2.
SF20-A
2.
Medium Density Residential
2.
1.531
3.
J. Baker
3.
SF1-A
3.
Medium Density Residential
3.
2.132
4.
W. Rucker
4.
AG
4.
Medium Density Residential
4.
2.96
5.
B. Hayes
5.
AG
5.
Medium Density Residential
5.
3.082
6.
L. Briscoe
6.
AG
6.
Medium Density Residentail
6.
4.2
7.
Carrol Isd
7.
AG
7.
Medium Density Residentail
7.
15.357
8.
Westerra Timmaron Lp
8.
R-PUD
8.
Retail Commercial
8.
2.687
9.
Venus (Drews) Partners V Lp
9.
R-PUD
9.
Retail Commercial
9.
3.933
10.
Joe Baker
10.
SF1-A
10.
Medium Density Residential
10.
4.723
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-077 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Pecan Acres
NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13)
RESPONSES: One (1) response was received from within the 200' notification area:
Wyndham Properties, Ltd, 751 E. Southlake Blvd, Suite 130, Southlake, TX,
in favor. (see attached letter)
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-077 Page 1
ilrs;'O ,?on: Dy:!)l t31 +d$81211- 0 WUNfA44M PRrFr'RT:F!-. r Wk k=
Wyndham Properties, Ltd.
�':- I :E ��•n a•r 6•ti
.'h i�. •4C a:
August 30, 2001
Bruce Paine
Planning Director
City of "uthlakc
Re, LAO1-077 Concept Man Drews Realty group, Inc
Dear. ASr. Payne
I own the property located east of the arrow rcfcrrn"d case I have revitWed the concept plan
curretuly proposed, and have no Object ions to that plan I hove met with I& Drews and o{fered to
grant a Cammrm Amr- s Fasemr:nt to my M access driveway that is located to the ca91 of my
buildings However during the August 23, Planning and Zaning meeting, I heard same discussion
regarding the elimination of the proposed Right in Right Our Driveway access to 5outhlake Blvd
As I stated at the F&G mccimg, I would t1M be to agrcunenl with that prupvsal. as I do not h6eVe
my driveway can kw0c the additional traffic that would be placed upOrt it
In the P&Z meeting on August 21, there was some discussion regarding a proposal to locate a toad
parallel to Southlake Blvd. frnrn ByrOn htclstut H1ud east tp Csrrotl Elaad I believe that road would
serve two functions, First it would allow better sects to Southlake Blvd. at controlled intersections.
and reduce the number of driveway requests along Soutldake Blvd. Second, this road would also
scrvc as a buffer between rea'rd'mwl and business properties. It is my bckf that rmdennol
development adjacem to Sauthiake Blvd is inappropriate, and as traffic increases along this
thoraughfire, the problems will only go worst There needs to be a transnion between a five (soon
us be seven lane) rcmadway and a residential davekrw rent.
ki i have previously slated i) I will agree to grant Mr I]nrws a common access cascrncnt 10 my
driveway ordy it his property is granted at least a Right In Right Out IJrivcway canto Southlake
Blvd. which will serve the mainrity of his Icm-nls ii) I agree with the proposed roadway bmwttn
Byroe Nelson Blvd vrrd Canroll Road, and I am willing to donate R 0 W. ftrr that road
If you have any questions or if I can be of any help. please feel rice to call me
S ely,
I. Wilkinson
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-077 Page 2
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.480-377
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOTS 2A AND 2B, AND LOT 2C,
BLOCK 1, DILG PLACE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-174, PAGE 30, PLAT
RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING
APPROXIMATELY 8.023 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF-1A"
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "0-1" OFFICE
DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE
PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by
the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-077 Page 1
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-1A" Single Family
Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 2
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,
are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 3
Being a portion of Lots 2A and 2B, and Lot 2C, Block 1, Dilg Place, an addition to
the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in
Volume 388-174, Page 30, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being
approximately 8.023 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A"
from "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District to "0-1" Office District as depicted
on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit
"B„
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance
with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general
welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and
the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the
streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the
community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration
among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 4
and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued
violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under
such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 5
disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being a portion of Lots 2A and 2B, and Lot 2C, Block 1, Dilg Place, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-174, Page 30,
Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 8.023 acres.
8.023 ACRE TRACT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
BEING a 8.023 acre tract of land situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 8W,
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being all of Lot 2-C, Block 1 and a portion
of Lots 2-A and 2-B. Black 1, DILG PLACE, an addition to the City of Southlake
described by plat recorded in Volume 388-174, Page 30, Plat Records Tarrant County,
Texas (PRTCT), said 8.023 acre tract of land being more particularly described as
follows;
BEGINNING at a 1I2-inch iron rod with cap stamped "AREA SURVEYORS" found in the
southerly right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (Farm -to -Market Road No. 1709, a
variable width right-of-way) for the southeast gamer of that called 0.078 acre tract of
land described in a deed to the Slate of Texas recorded in Volume 9913, Page 1993,
Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas, (DRTCT) same being the northeast comer of that
called 1.963 acre tract of land described in deed to Creekside Office Joint Venture
recorded in Votume 13279, Page 554. DRTCT and being in the east line of said Lot 2-13;
THENCE South 18"20'13" East along the common line of said Lot 2-13 and said 1,963
acre tract of land_ a distance of 533.69 feet to a M-inch iron rod found for the southeast
comer of said Lot 2-13 same being the northeast comer of said Lot 2-C;
THENCE South 00"2437` East along the common line of said Lot 2-C and said 1.963
acre tract of land, a distance of 558.133 feet to a fence post found for the southeast
comer of said Lot 2-C and being in a north line of Lot 1, Block 60, TIMARRON
ADDITION, an addition to the City of Southlake described by plat recorded in Cabinet A,
Slide 3674, DRTCT, from which a 1/2-inch iron rod found bears South 89"52'34" East, a
distance of 39.12 feet;
THENCE North WIS2'34" West along the common line of said Lot 2-C and said Lot 1,
at a calculated distance of 240.74 feet passing the southwest comer of said Lot 2-C
same being the southeast comer of said Lot 2-A, conlinuing in all for a total distance of
457.37 feel to a 5/8-inch iron rod found for the southwest corner of said Lot 2-A:
THENCE North 01001'22' East along the common line of said Lot 2-A and said Lot 1, at
a distance of 267.42 feet passing a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "CARTER &
BURGESS" found for the southeast comer of Lot 2R, Block t, TIMARRON ADDITION,
Phase 5, an addition to the City of Southlake described by plat rerarded in Cabinet A.
Slide 4395, PRTCT, same being the northeast corner of said Lot 1. continuing along the
common line of said Lot 2-A and said Lot 2R at a distance of 567.63 feet passing a "-
inch iron rod with cap stamped "CARTER & BURGESS" found for the northeast comer
of said Lot 2R same being the southeast comer of Lot 3111 of said TIMARRON
's�p,•525W�geGlti7t 51-05tiSUr'14'EY,cwiing:7FSC;FhPT pals dUG
ffn JUL 2 3 Z901
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 8
ADDITION, continuing along the common line of said Lot 2-A and said Lot 3R, in all for
a total distance of 680.77 feet to a point for corner,
THENCE Mort N90° Q'W East, a distance of 224,18 feet to a paint for comer:
THENCE North 04`50'26" East, a distance of 183.95 feet to the point of curvature of a
curve to the left having a radius of 70.00 feat;
THENCE northwesterly with said curve to the left through a central angle of 32°27'42"
for an arc distance of 39.66 foot, a chord bearing of North 11=23"55" West and a chord
distance of 39.13 feat to the point of tangency;
THENCE North 27"37'16" West a distance of 117.40 feet to the point of curtivaiure of a
curve to the right having a radius of 75.00 feet;
THENCE northwesterly with said curve to the right through central angle of 25"21'28"
for an arc dislanoa of 34.50 feet, a chord bearing of North 14026'32" West and a chord
distance of 34,20 feet to the point of tangency;
THENCE North 011,15'48' Wes0a distance of 20.55 feet to a paint for comer in the
aforementioned southerly right-of-way fine of Southlake i loulavard:
THENCE along said southerly right-of-way line the following:
North 69°34'26" East, a distance of 1.53 feet to a 518-inch iron rod with cap
stamped "BURY+PARTNERS" found forcorner;
N orlti 87°39'54" East, a distance of 103.32 feet to the PO I NT OF S E G I NNI N G;
CONTAINING a computed area of 349.474 square feet or 8,023 acres of land,
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 9
rq
EXHIBIT "B"
Ua;"l(ding3:)Vld
9 X3l '"Nr)OD INvJj"l
3WHIM6
"1'0 '0 "ID
193nt)3u Dm�Z 93sn
I-C WOd NVIJ 143ONO3
6wx31 '3)i"unog Ac kuo
'ONI 'dnou!) uw3w 6m3uc
EN
Case No.
ZAOI-089
2.�
Jwl
--T-T
F. n. i Z"U -Up"HI A FlAk V
J;
U7
L
------
-7:
Attachment H
Page 10
i
City of Southlake
DeDartment of Planning
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-089
PROJECT: Pecan Acres "C-2" Zoning Change
REQUEST: On behalf of James W. Baker, Drews Realty Investments is requesting approval of
a zoning change and concept plan.
ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading for zoning change and concept plan request.
ATTACHMENTS: (A)
Background Information
(B)
Vicinity Map
(C)
Plans and Support Information
(D)
Concept Plan Review Summary
(E)
Developer Comments
(F)
Surrounding Property Owner Map
(G)
Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(H)
Ordinance No. 480-378
(I)
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086)
Case No.
ZA01-089
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: James W. Baker
APPLICANT: Drews Realty Investments
PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to receive a zoning change and concept plan
approved for the property to "C-2" Local Retail Commercial development on
the property.
PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM
1709) approximately 410' east of the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway.
HISTORY: -July 3, 1979 City Council approved a Plat Showing for two lots on 25
acres of land.
-February 22, 1984 City Council approved a Plat Revision for a subdivision
of Lot 2 into three lots.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: This property is legally described as being a portion of Lots 2A and 2B, Block
1, Dilg Place Subdivision, being 1.855 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential
REQUESTED ZONING: "C-2" Office District
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan
The MTP recommends Southlake Blvd to have 130' of right-of-way.
Adequate R.O.W. exists for this road.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed site will have one (1) right-in/right-out access onto E.
Southlake Blvd. The right-in/right-out drive lines up with Foxborough
Drive across E. Southlake Blvd. Common access drives are shown to
connect into the property to the west for access to Byron Nelson Pkwy and
to the office development to the east for access to a full access driveway.
E. Southlake Blvd is a five lane, undivided thoroughfare with a
continuous, two-way, center left turn lane. The roadway will ultimately
be widened to a seven lane roadway. Adequate R.O.W. has been
dedicated.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-089 Page 1
WATER & SEWER:
ESTIMATED IMPACT
FEES*:
P&Z ACTION:
May, 2001 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 (between Carroll Ave. and
Byron Nelson Pk
24hr
West Bound (WB) (23,281
East Bound (EB) (21,176
WB
Peak A.M. 1,220 11-12 a.m.
Peak P.M. 2,168 5-6 p.m.
EB
Peak A.M. 2,057 7-8 a.m.
Peak P.M. 1,292 12-1 p.m.
Traffic Impact
Use
Sq. Ft.
Vtpd*
AM -IN
AM-
OUT
PM -IN
PM -
OUT
Restaurant
7,000
630
32
7
39
24
Retail
3,000
122
9
10
9
6
Total
10,000
752
41
17
48
30
Pathways Master Plan
The Southlake Pathways Master Plan recommends an eight (8) foot paved,
multi -use trail along the south side of E. Southlake Blvd. The Plan also
proposes a natural, multi -use trail along the west side of the development.
The natural trail will connect into S. Carroll Avenue near Continental
Boulevard.
A 10" and an 8" sanitary sewer line run along either side of the property. A
12" water line runs along the south side of E. Southlake Blvd.
Water
$11,895.30 assumes 2 - 2" simple meters
Wastewater
$7,412.74 assumes 2 - 2" simple meters
Roadway
$9,040.58 assumes 1- quality restaurant and 1- retail store
* Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shown above only represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department.
August 9, 2001; Approved to Table (6-0) to the August 23, 2001, Planning
and Zoning Commission Meeting.
August 23, 2001; Approved to Table (6-0) to the September 6, 2001,
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
September 6, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review
Summary No. 1, dated August 3, 2001, allowing requested variances.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated August 3, 2001. The
following variances need council action:
• Stacking depth. The stacking depth required this site is 100 feet.
• Spacing between drives on F.M. 1709. The minimum spacing is 250'
Case No.
ZA01-089
Attachment A
Page 2
between a right-in/right-out drive and any other drives on FM 1709 (E.
Southlake Blvd).
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-089 Page 3
Vicinity Map
Pecan Acres
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
W
E
Case No. Attachment B
ZA01-089 Page 1
SYX31'A1Nnoo INVWUVI
3AVlHiMQ 40 "0
30
1103V V"NOZ G3Sn
E-D I k-0 WOJ NV-W 1,130N00
3)lv-HlnGG 30 ALJ
'ON1 'dnowD Liiv3w smgua
A.---
1XI
0
roxl3OROUGH
LANE
D
0
Case No.
ZAOI-089
H i I j
HID AII H[
it ,
Mil , an
.. .........
gyp
Attachment C
Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA01-089 Review No.: One Date of Review: 08/03/01
Project Name: Concept Plan — Pecan Acres (Dilg Place)
APPLICANT: Drews Realty Group
John Drews
580 Commerce Street. Suite 400
Southlake, TX 76092
PHONE: (817) 251-2258
FAX: (817) 416-8418
ENGINEER: Bury+Partners, DFW, Inc.
Juan J. Vasquez, PE
5310 Harvest Hill Road, Suite 100
Dallas, TX 75024
PHONE: (972) 991-0011
FAX: (972) 991-0278
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY
ON 07/23/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER
CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086.
1. Show the building line along F.M. 1709 as 50' measured from the property line.
2. Clearly show, with shading or cross -hatches, the bufferyards (5', Type `A') required along Pecan
Creek Court frontage.
3. Common Access Easements must be provided for drives connecting to off -site properties.
4. The following changes are needed regarding driveways:
a. Provide minimum depth for all points of ingress/egress to the site along FM 1709. The
stacking depth required for this site is 100 feet. The applicant is proposing 39 feet of
stacking depth. (A variance has been requested.)
b. Provide minimum spacing between drives along FM 1709. Label the distances between
the proposed driveway centerline to the nearest existing driveway centerlines off -site in
both directions. The minimum spacing is 250' between the proposed right-in/right-out
drive and other access drives on FM 1709 (E. Southlake Blvd). The proposed drive is
290 feet from the drive to the east and 209 feet from the drive to the west. The proposed
drive will line up with Foxborough Drive across FM 1709. (A variance has been
requested.)
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-089 Page 1
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* This review is based on the "C-2" Zoning District regulations.
This site falls within the applicability of the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations in Section 43,
Part II. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan, the
applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan
must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior
to issuance of a building permit. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan
review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements:
• Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance
No. 557, as amended.
• Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per
§43.13d, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480,
as amended.
• Spill -over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended
for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the
Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
• Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended.
• Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544.
• Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-089 Page 2
Drews Realty Investments
Real Estate Investment and Development
July 1, 2001
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street
Southlake, Texas 76092
Re: Case No. ZA01-097
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Applicant requests the following variances for the above case:
We request that the 1o0' stacking depth requirement be waived since
this site is being connected to existing drives in the properties to the east and west, the
alignment of which will not allow 1DOI stacking depth for the proposed drive from
FM1709.
Per Staffs recommendation, we request a variance for spacing
between the proposed drive on the west in order to line up the drive with one across
the street.
Thank you for your consideration of these requests.
Sincerely
John .
c pr.rdg
0701.City re CaseNo.ZA01-077
fm _ o;z�0
580 Commerce Street, Suite 400 • Southlake, Texas 76092.9113 • 817.251.2258 • metro/817.329.1684 • fax/817.416.8418
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-089 Page 1
08131120111 11: 21 817-416-8416
Draws Realty Investments
Real Estate mvesbment tWKI DO"'W ant
August 31, 2001
FIMft and Zouwg C.
city ofSautldakc
Sout &W, -rues 76092
NZM REALTY 7HVE5TM PACE 02
pX.• Update on Card ZAOI-077 and 7.0I-99'
LadksaW Gentlemen:
At the last Mcdig we were asked to address WVerel issues prier to rctWmhV to the Concinim
Of
on SgAeMW 6- Tfltese isaucs included (1) tredm8 with SPIN. (2) de aXi ag tb, Z' t?
OW Arid 0* adjw=t lead owne s Room WdMf'$ the CSlty''s irsoeq in h�uuldlt a Sav" ROM
Eyon Nelson Parks%*Y- to Cum,, Smet through both pmpwics, and 1) C Tdse
at ahmodvts
to a proposed rx;*in-r4bt� drivew► y on Soulhleacc 13aulevWd
bavc ban hwwIlled as foUOwt:
CRl MS3911Z Plan for their oagsadtzsrtioR� Adclressuag
T ast nig�lt we Ma with gP1N to pax�Grn y,pl (acrosa
concerns by neiobvrs wbio lice an 'he stroct soutbt of the elrmtartrxy
the *glue cimrnxl W d XbOGI pla gmwo), we agreed (1) to pbmt frets elan$ tbt aautlicra
wial w1 be Ioo� at the back of office 6vi W9$, (2) to create
i I'� t3' 1ir�e so the hoa�+dn s frouoa the sotuhrs:t bowedtuY for dumpstcrs (if altowed by 09ditme) In
ccaoot� locsfion away
order to rod= n�oisc croe*d dying t�vlJoC i0k aria (3) to 00, ij� Waiar !ham shines
south toward their booms (a$ to the 0,wid allowed by Ord'towcO Th= sx9�OM aieo
expressed oo icm about the lbraspectrve mud between By= Ne vrt end Ca=ro}!. itic t
rep tetive stated ihcy 09 have known WM&A 8 would cv=iw&y be buOt on t1W Subjec!
pmPCdy ` A their mm�z i0ome r+s bt3 *a their vitw and the rioiac W..cs be addreasod "*&*
do IOWDMI asWA* OMM
In= raised by other cittaeus @ek&d (1) tbt etd1heowal tb=c io be used for the bda6W in
the dteveloQrncrtt wbooh 1 ca 6k" wotil6 be *[a]" to that msd for the exWM Vil W e<
US &g dpvebpers establi hi g ambittct�sl controls &r all Gt s
7"urrarion prated•avchrdi>� iA the !ut>rjc 8t Freers £k+eck) tad ( lown 11°Q we a�ticipsi
woutd
to be built se box t sec totally bulb ew — I explained we cst 2
oa y Were buildings wht� }' ,,,e pave. I babe" these WCM the t Y issue$
300 to 350 bonged on ibe low-deashy P
rraeed, e[l ofwhkh seemod to be answered is the satisfaot o Boulevard or ionu a�f
then wcrc na vomaeM d about the &ri' Y
at southuke buiklm8s next to tba Scho 4wd- ro ==wTim, u was a very co `c "Wd� with setiEral
rsra& by the r"mm (s wit ns the wrvtrnrrg trees, dwr e¢ locari4st, a
t yd
� to inciwk lathe devck►pn1e�.
58bGorrunsro►Srresk Suits IM s-olska, Tems Teaert eT7.251.225$ SrrlBiT.4SG.A4t8 nweroJE t7.32Y,7694
M AUG 112001
Case No.
ZA01-089
Attachment E
Page 2
08/31/2001 11.21 817-05-8418 DFJEW5 REALTY IMIESTM PAGE 03
Pl m iog aced Zvniag Conw inian
Ate W al, 2001
Page 2
)(toad_1ee� $vrow l�elwa and Carroll
in 1o65nS at the &&sibiliaY of lbe- ptopovA rwid, Charlie Thorns looked at tht pFoxirnity Of'tk
exis* lrm&m cuts on Byron Ncbon, owib and sauth of the proposed ermancc to ttx Byron
Melton to Carroll road, and deuamined that that location pmveats an addhional xwdian curs
b=4 raWo on H}zon Nelson for the proposed road. Therefore, if the road ira built it would Awd
to have its Byrooti Nelson connection lomc4 apperoi&Aot0y in the wne location as the exiting
xigl)Ut-=-reW-out driveway on the pwpaty bctw= Tbc Village at '] w mtroo and the vbool
C—Fimmn III PropaW). Asswnbg thus localki m our ergiwm bane looked at what h4=1 a
50-foot right-of-way with eL ewbed aced guncrod 11-fvot mad would W?e on ttw 'fk=mn III
Wapesty. in addition, they have looked at the hop= of %be w04,oa the Pecan Creek pwPMY•
a&6cally, the addhiM of mxb a road Wo thm pbw nrGasu Ahr reduces the nsabhe ijrd cm the
'i'u>aarrate IS] Property aril mkiznalfp' impam the Fe= Creek prapntp_ Thk said, if the City
derides to include tl.r propmad rood oot the Thoroughfare Max we would be prcpmvd to &mtc
the right -of --way for the road (and build the toad whets both Projccts arc devclvpod) if the City
wit] wank with us *A setback *equhrocarte, buf1cr Ywdx ew., and give W Offs tliM ]=pact Fee
7rW up to the coat of building the road. To su nw ttjvc; we are prepared to work with the testy xf
it decides it wrung this road bwat.
R -In-R ►t-0al D a balblikke Rou
As you Wray remember during tha PdUc Hearing of these carat, Terry Wilkinson ex M'cd 1115
wMjapm to grant a cross.aeeess esscment so trmft Anw betwem his propaW to the
Fecan Creek, and T-W VAtW at Thwron would be ittgsMWA. In fra hmdi9w&miom I load with
Teary, he explai " that bus wMiWWW tQ grant eb count was besod on bit assmn4don that
the right-iri-rig2rt.om driveww ibt Peoaa Creek would be Wt. Dtberwiw, be is Was i crated is
"t"e$ the easeanertt. His posiwn is undergmdebk A= all eastbonred Pse.9ue Creek trnffee
would Wty be examg aarosa tug property if there wera no 6gi t-our-ri&.in dtrivmsy on the
Pccaa CF=k property. Attached is a letter hom Terry re8z&%9 this ivw. We tbM looked at
the fcssr"ttz y of not having accsss is TWs propeM and not bav tag the r19M-qutA*-in
ddyew$y ae prgm,*d. The mm;h would be an traffic kr bath The Village as TuMM and
Pecadtt Creek ewa mg mnd exitmg Ibmugb the existing fuB4n-riAt out cTajiw ay at rice cal
soutbWm Boukvwd cjon oo to 71te VOW at Tirrrar m We are cKU- ely a Dmmed thm
would Alt m m unsafe mmvion bmm&4e that driveway (at tide ftqwnt of City CV ,MKU1 during
Concept Plan Apo *vW) was built to mum spec'rftc 6Dw-- an s resuftIng in a 4rvrRNY that -
whik adcquat* se v4 The Villagc at Tizn rton - was not dosigrtcd to accommodate traffic
Claw from w4 to 1704 for both The Vlillaga at Tunarrm acid r4wem property.
FQr tbew remmmn, we tbnrrk it is essential that she right-tu-dt-out driveway be incl ed in the
Pecan (leek devtktptmA. By b►aviing the comab natbA of the rcqucstsd rwn-out- v�0-m
*=Veway far ! Creek and saacas tO TMWs fa sca�rire d'"Way, the Mt Vnty of traffic
nvovemem from and io Pm%* Creek would be u oved east of 'rhea Village at Term to a
location thmt is a safer d V&We from Syron wal" than the Vi tags• at T'anarron driveway. We
see w ather praaC -A sohnim
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-089 Page 3
0613112001 11= 21 617-416-8418 DRM REALTY T WVESTM F 46E 04
P1t g ao4 & camwis9iouv.
August 31, 2001
3
Hop fi ly, this update will be helpful to you in preparing for the oontbmtim of Ow public
Hearing mxt Tinusdsy. In the memiffie, please let atie kww if you have airy quMions or
uawwpcntx
Sir�car�,
Jo w
t
0. Terry Wane=
0831,MZ we PC
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-089 Page 4
R8131/2001 11,21 817-416-8418 DREk6 REALTY IAE5TM PAGE 05
earr3112"l 09, 49 8374OW20 WNWAM PW-KRTIES PAGE E2
Wyndham Properties, Ltd.
15, S. SdAym ONUL
Suer tab
soqinWd. TX moss
19 P) dol-2a00 rem
Avgpa 30, 2001
Batista Plyne
Platsaiasg Dimaor
City of Southleloe
F.B. Z OI-077 Comtwpt Pt= Drews Reeky Grog. Inc.
Dew W. Peyne,
I own the property located east of the above re(waxed cue. I have revidwed tht towgg 1414
c,ffmty psopoged, 4nd Wo t,o objmtlora to thu plan. t have out wish Iv1r. Drawn fad oft" w
gnat a Corcoran Am* Eseea MU to my till rcoese drnrowe{y that it fixated 10 the east of my
buiWiM. lkmrcm during tits Avguvt 23, 1Ptstrib* end Zoning mewhit I heard alarm di wo3itm
regar tta tbp efia'i nasio2 of the propond Right in R*ht Out Driveway Wan to SputhUlm RIA.
As t elated at the P&Z vw0ng, I would not be in agreenw= with ihst proposal. do M beliom
rrgr &Wewq eaa harAte alas aMtbooet uxfFw rhaz would be plead upo it.
In tlut P&Z vnov B op August 27, tbcrc was same discuselon regar&* a plerow to lw4ta ■ road
W&M tp SwoUsIm DW. !boat! Hyme, Nalwo Blvd. east w Carroll Road. I btdinm that road w0uid
eeNe two fmakm, pint it viould *Ww bettor t<cur<s to Souegske Blvd. at controlled intayectiwk ,
and radnx the rrwtrba of driveway reVws along Sou&Ww Btve. Second, this road would Woo
nerve as a buflilr beew"n tMitiearW and businrue FwpWies. It is my b0W dta residential
development edjaetmi to Svuti>Mc Mvd is impprophate, and as traflac iectbliet OWS WA
thoroughfkM the pr*blatm -ill 4jp;y Sd aotfe. Thera needs to he a traaeition between a five (man
to bo evvm tarp) vWwdty =W a residential developmtsm.
At I han Provim%IY 919tak i) i •wet agree to &furl B& Draws a eotm"It acctua aammm to my
dhivemy o* if his peopesty is grsettad Al laa.t a Right 10 Rimrt Out Dfiftwq onto SOUNKba
Blvd. wNth will same the rflowity of Ids teararrts. ii) ( agm vd& the pooposed roadway betwea4
Byron Ne4W )a" +cod C=on Road, and i am v4lCteg to danam R.O.W.1br that road.
If you have aey queckms or if I can iae of any heap, please feel free to cal! rra6.
1G -- `
L. 1Yillonson
REu Atria 312031
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-089 Page 5
M
Surrounding Property Owners
Pecan Acres
Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1. Southlake-Foxborough Ltd
1.
Cl
1.
Office Commercial
1.
1.717
2, Southlake-Foxborough Ltd.
2.
SF20-A
2.
Medium Density Residential
2.
1.531
3. J. Baker
3.
SF1-A
3.
Medium Density Residential
3.
2.132
4. Creekside Office
4.
SP-1
4.
Medium Density Residential
4.
1.963
5. W. Rucker
5.
AG
5.
Medium Density Residential
5.
2.96
6. J. Baker
6.
SF1-A
6.
Medium Density Residential
6.
2.623
7. J. Baker
7.
SF1-A
7.
Medium Density Residential
7,
4.723
8. Westerra Timmarron Lp
8.
R-PUD
8.
Retail Commercial
8.
2.687
9. Venus (Drews) Partners V Lp
9.
R-PUD
9.
Retail Commercial
9.
3.933
Case No.
ZA01-089
Attachment F
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Pecan Acres
NOTICES SENT: Six (6)
RESPONSES: None
Case No. Attachment G
ZA01-089 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.480-378
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4801) AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOTS 2A AND 2B, BLOCK 1, DILG
PLACE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN
VOLUME 388-1749 PAGE 30, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.855 ACRES, AND MORE
FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM
"SF -IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "C-2"
LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON
THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND
GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by
the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-lA" Single Family
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 1
Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 2
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,
are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being a portion of Lots 2A and 2B, Block 1, Dilg Place, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 3
174, Page 30, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.855
�W acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF -IA" Single
Family Residential District to "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District as depicted
on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit
"B„
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance
with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general
welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and
the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the
streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the
community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration
among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses
and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
Case No. Attachment H
ZAOI-089 Page 4
land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued
violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under
such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
disposition by the courts.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 5
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of 92001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
�wl DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being a portion of Lots 2A and 213, Block 1, Dilg Place, an addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-174, Page 30, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.855 acres.
1.855 ACRE TRACT
PROPERTY DESCRIIPTION
BEING a 1.885 acre tract of land situated in the O.W. Knight Survey. Abstract No. 899,
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of Lots 2-A and 2-B. Block
1, DfLG PLACE, an addition to the City of Southlake, descriibed by plat recorded in
Volume 388-174, Page 30, Plat Records Tarrant County, Texas (PRTCT), said 1.855
acre tract of land being more particularly described as follows;
COMMENCING at a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped 'AREA SURVEYORS" found in
the southerly right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (Farm -to -Market Load No. 1709,
a variable width right-of-way) for the southeast comer of that called 0,078 acre tract of
land described in a dead to the State of Texas recorded in Volume 9913, Page 1993,
Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas. (DRTCT) same being the northeast comer of that
called 1.953 acre trace of land described in deed to Creekside Office Joint Venture
recorded in Volume 13279, Page $54, DRTCT and being in the east line of said Lot 2-8,
THENCE South 87039'54" Vest along said southerly right-of-way line, a distance of
103.32 feet to a SAI- inch iron rod with cap stamped "Bury+Partners" found for comer;
THENCE South 89°34'26" West continuing along said southerly right-of-way line, a
distance of 1.53 feet t4 the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE South 01615'48" East, a distance of 20.55 feat to the point of curvature of a
curve to the left having a radius of 75.00 feet;
THENCE southeasledy with said curve to the left through a central angle of 25°21'28"
for an arc distance of 34.50 feet, a chord bearing of South 14°26'32" East and a chord
distance of 34.20 feet to the point of tangency;
THE NC E South 273716" East, a d istance of 117,40 feet to the poi nt of cu rvatu re of a
curve to the right having a radius of 70.00 feet;
THENCE southeasterly with said curve to the right having through a central angle of
32°2T42" for an arc distance of 39.66 feet, a chord bearing of South 11023'25" East and
a chord distance of 39.13 feet to the end of said curare;
THENCE South 04°50'26- Wost, a drstanoe of ;ice feet to a point for comer;
THENCE North 901100'00" Nest, a distance of 224.18 feet to a point for corner in the
west line of said Lot 2A same being the east line of Let 3R Block 60, TWARRON
ADDITION, Phase 5, an addition to the City of Southlake described by Plat recorded in
Cabinel A, Slide 4395, PRTCT;
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 8
THENCE North 01"1'22" East along the common Iine of said Lot 2A and said Lot 3R, a
distance of 381.36 feet to a 112-inch iron rod with cap stamped 'BURY+PITTNIAN"
found for the northeast comer of said Lot 3-R same being the southwest comer of that
calletl 0.067 acre tract of land described in deed to the State of Texas recorded in
Volume 9913, Pare 1988, DRTCT, and being in the aforementioned southerly right-of-
way line of Southlake Boulevard;
THENCE along said southerly right-of-way line the following:
South 87°33'49' East, a distance of 63.34 feet to a Texas Department of
Transpodation brass monurnent found for corner;
Forth 89134'26' East, a distance of 98.47feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
CONTAINING a computed area of 80,810 square feet or 1,855 acres of land.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 9
EXHIBIT "B"
_
`�„'-1r'' r"^•' �'.•�i'iq wli"'�o'I
sa3U'�JBJ+lane (,�
SVX31 'A1NnOJ 1Ntldd V1
10,Fdlno6 jO A11J
3JVld 'J110
163no3u 'JNNOZ s3sn
Z-J S l-0 N01 N" 1d3JNOJ
6VX31 •3)iVlHln06 f0 ALA
'JNI '.InO D "WN 6M3N0
"-----
i
ar,y �..•�
-- -
0
e" I
„4 � ieeelppp
iOMAOUON O
LANE j F,. dI�
¢ ma
!'<
11
O
In
I _ I
Y
II II
I
d 9i]if:
�t3
�:953!iEl
sei it:'u�i
9:]]�S LIi
9:4Ysie
9E2 )::E
9:i )..�
9:]J..E 1
�L�13ld2MY51YeCr5i1,ji�oo7lliFi7iii7iii�7ir�ze�9$dAd
Wll k'x •_!•¢; �'¢:!•_:�. _.:'s S.4._ Ak4�kS ¢.:bkh;hbkk"-b4'=''-S6
�,
�€�Y.i.iiEdi9i.:EF.F.cre..rrP....?5:rir A:3's!E,EcK"[S�i93?K
� §i
K� peF�e��aiieieS333ap�ei�iiEldlEi3333EtJ3ldddES#
q<�
•
���keaaK¢criesatacxaaFn_a�a��eatz3:.zYiza.+.aasaaxakea
��
K�3E
kb
!
d �
>! EE
i is atic6
a
j�
I {�
11ry!'_ ILL_L t I •1����13 �_ I b ^ � � _ ¢ - �tl�' � e': I /���30:
i
—
t
s
1
Case No. Attachment H
ZA01-089 Page 10
IN
City of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2001
CASE NO: ZA01-091
PROJECT: Tracts 3E2A2, 3E2A4, 3E3A, 3E12, & 3E13 of the J. Childress Heirs Survev
REQUEST: On behalf of Warren E. Allen, Jimmy and Sally Adamcik are requesting approval for
a zoning change.
ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading for zoning change approval.
ATTACHMENTS: (A) 'Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plat Exhibit
(D) Surrounding Property Owner Map
(E) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses
(F) Ordinance No. 480-379
STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086)
Case No.
ZA01-091
N
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Warren E. Allen
APPLICANTS: Jimmy and Sally Adamcik
PURPOSE: The applicant is requesting a zoning change to "SF-1A" zoning for a single-
family residential use.
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at 3259 Lake Drive.
HISTORY: There is no previous development history.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The property is legally described as Tracts 3E2A2, 3E2A4, 3E3A, 3E12, and
3E13 of the John Childress Heirs Survey, Abstract No. 254, being 1.19 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: The Subdivision Ordinance requires that all residential lots have frontage
on a public street. Lake Drive is a private ingress/egress access easement.
Currently it exists as a dirt road. Fire emergency vehicles must have
access to the property and have area to maneuver. Fire lanes shall be
designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus
and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving
capabilities.
WATER & SEWER: Adequate water service is not available to the property. If access is more
than 10 feet but less than 24 feet wide, a fire hydrant is requiredwithin
800 feet of the residence and an approved residential fire sprinkler system
is required. If a minimum 24 feet wide access is provided, a fire hydrant
is required within 800 feet of the residence or an approved residential fire
sprinkler system is required. The existing water lines are too small and
must be updated to current standards and able to support any new
hydrants.
There is no sanitary sewer service extending to the property. The property
does have the minimum 1-acre size for use of a septic system. However, a
permit must be obtained from the Tarrant County Health Department.
P&Z ACTION: September 6, 2001; Approved (6-0).
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-091 Page 1
STAFF COMMENTS: A zoning request to "SF-1A" does not require a Concept Plan Review by
Staff.
A plat has been submitted for review. A copy of the plat is attached as exhibit
«C„
Case No. Attachment A
ZA01-091 Page 2
Vicinity Map
Tracts 3EO2A, 3EO2A4, 3E13
of the Jahn Childress Heirs Survey
Abstract 254
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
Vil
Case No.
ZA01-091
N
S
10,
Case No. Attachment B
ZA01-091 Page 1
Vq
In
Case No.
ZAOI-091
Al. .1
.1. q;
H;
SAW
p.v I
Fle.1
. . .......
EE N
w4
�•
"= E.a
9 7
8a..
tzz t
z
0
O
t:
cm
CNz
CQ
Attachment C
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Tracts 3E02A, 3E02A4, 3E12, 3E13 of the John Childress Heirs Survey,
Abstract 254
Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1.
W. Allen
1.
AG
1.
Medium Density Residential
1.
0.378
2.
I. Gossett
2.
AG
2.
Medium Density Residential
2.
0.561
3.
W. Allen
3.
AG
3.
Medium Density Residential
3.
0.791
4.
USA
4.
AG
4.
Corp of Engineers Boundary
4.
4.301
5.
USA
5.
AG
5.
Corp of Engineers Boundary
5.
3.812
6.
R. Tucker
6.
AG
6.
Medium Density Residential
6.
1.237
7.
G. Mason
7.
SF20-B
7.
Medium Density Residential
7.
0.505
8.
G. Mason
8.
SF20-B
8.
Medium Density Residential
8.
0.375
9.
G. Mason
9.
AG
9.
Medium Density Residential
9.
1.160
10.
B. Snyder
10.
AG
10.
Medium Density Residential
10.
0.227
11.
B. Snyder
11.
AG
11.
Medium Density Residential
11.
0.233
12.
R. Wilkie
12.
AG
12.
Medium Density Residential
12.
0.856
13.
R. Wilkie
13.
AG
13.
Medium Density Residential
13.
1.130
14.
J. Jones
14.
AG
14.
Medium Density Residential
14.
9.569
15.
R. Wilkie
15.
AG
15.
Medium Density Residential
15.
1.130
16.
L. Flaherty
16.
AG
16.
Medium Density Residential
16.
0.200
17.
L. Flaherty
17.
AG
17.
Medium Density Residential
17.
0.104
Case No. Attachment D
ZA01-091 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Tracts 3E2A2, 3E2A4, 3E3A, 3E12, and 3E13
Notices Sent: Seventeen (17)
Responses: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area:
• Gerald Mason, 3203 Lake Drive, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received September
4, 2001)
One (1) response was received outside of the 200' notification area:
• Betty Jones Foreman, 2652 Oakdale, Houston, TX, in favor. (Received
September 6, 2001)
• Bryan Wilkie, 3249 Lake Drive, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received September
6,2000)
Case No. Attachment E
ZA01-091 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.480-379
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 3E2A, 3E2A4, 3E3A, 3E12, AND 3E13,
SITUATED IN THE JOHN CHILDRESS HEIRS SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO.254, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.19 ACRES,
AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT
"A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO 6SF-1A" SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND
GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by
the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to
adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other
structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and
map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance
with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural
District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-091 Page 1
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those
who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-091 Page 2
original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been
a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts
of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore
feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,
are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,
Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being Tracts 3E2A, 3E2A4, MA, 3E12, And 3E13, situated in the John Childress
Heirs Survey, Abstract No. 254, and being approximately 1.19 acres, and more fully
and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF -IA"
Single Family Residential District.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-091 Page 3
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not
amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance
with the comprehensive -plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general
welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and
the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the
streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the
community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration
among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses
and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-091 Page 4
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those
instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall
be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued
violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under
such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final
disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-091 Page 5
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public
hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this
ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13
of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-091 Page 6
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the
MAYOR
ATTEST:
day of , 2001.
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE:
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-091 Page 7
EXHIBIT "A"
Being Tracts 3E2A, 3E2A4, 3E3A, 3E12, and 3E13, situated in the John Childress Heirs Survey,
Abstract No. 254, and being approximately 1.19 acres.
T-TOF TEXAS }
i : N7 OF TkRRANT
I.%T KIIEREAS w'a:rE'n v iga- Ai l e.'i , is the OVner or a t Kact i r. the
.:r Chi.survey Ahstract No. ?SA, Situated in the Citiy of
i:Iuthlake. '"arrant, CountY, Texas, -as desCribed in deeds (if record
i, 'Jme ;'??5; raze 846, and Volume 6250, Page 483, and being
r= r-a-ti^::1ar'y dusuribed by mete,; and bounds as follows:
'= n Lr.•g )� a 'r''" iron set L&t tInCt i,ter�.pi,,ion a 0xv
rcrt!•,erl; and ca�•.eriy lanes of a road eaienna6t
naving a vtdtb of 20.00 feet as deRcribed in a deed
:)f record in VOlume, +7132, Page 352. Deed Recr3rds.
;arrant County, Texas, said poir•t 4eing by deed calls
908 varas Horth, 301.5 vara9 west. K. 890 E. 20.5 feet,
and N. 10-191E. 70 feet from the southeast corder of
said Childress $urvey,said [Saint also being the
5o•Jt?1wt'St c4rArr of the herein describcd tract:
'.?9.84 feet along the easterly line
t're above Mentioned road easement to a !f2 iron
art :n same:
THEW: ti;. lil-3C'-00-E, 95.30 feet continuir-a along said
eaiter:y :ine to a 1/2" iron found in same for the
narthwest corner pf the herein descrjksed tract, said
point beiny tt-e 3outhvNist. corner of a tract descrit>ed
in a deed recorded In volume 7944, Paye 1639, ,Deed
Records, Tarrant Cv'rrlty, Texas:
THENCE S. 994-00'-00"E. 202-90 feet along the south tine cf
the la3t fefarvr:ce-� tract to a lf? iron found at the
southeast corner ofsarne in the vest :ire of a tract
Weser, `ed i:i a dee .` to the USA as C-261 , for Crapevine
'-ake:
S. SC-38'- 00•' E, 228, !0 feet alone said west line of
Tact C-261, ;o a 112- iron set 1-1 same Cnr the
3•D•jthe4st corner of t he lie reir, de::r it'e- t ract r
„1-..1;CF 2?3-02 Cppt a3or.g the rcrthe•r:y line
of a read t3asement, above men ttoni:d, to the PQTNT OF
?ECIMIN INc. and containing t,It4 acres.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA01-091 Page 8
ny
I _LL 6.J4 j I
UL
ij-
41
s
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
Department Name
City Manager's Office
Department of Public Safety
Department of Human Resources
Department of Finance
Department of Community Services
Department of Public Works
Department of Economic Development
Department of Planning
Shana Yelverton
Rick Black
Harold Cates
Sharen Elam
Kevin Hugman
Pedram Farahnak
Greg Last
Bruce Payne
Capital Improvements Program
FY 2001-02 TO FY 2005-06
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
MEMORANDUM
September 6, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Capital Improvements Program Technical Committee
SUBJECT: Technical Committee Recommend FY 2001-02 TO FY 2005-06 Capital
Improvements Program
In accordance with the Texas Local Government Code and the Charter of the City of Southlake,
the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2001-02 to FY 2005-06 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is
submitted for your consideration.
The CIP establishes a five (5) year funding schedule for the purchase, construction or replacement
of physical assets of the City. Capital improvements typically have a useful life of over ten (10)
years and value greater than $10,000. The first year of the Capital Improvements Program is
called the Capital Budget, and is appropriated in the same manner as the annual operating
budget. Funds for projects are appropriated on an annual basis. Projects approved for
subsequent years are approved for planning purposes only and do not receive expenditure
authority until they are part of the Capital Budget.
In an attempt to present City Council with a proposed CIP that has been more thoroughly reviewed
and evaluated than in the past, the city staff created the CIP technical committee. In the past,
each department generated its own list of CIP projects and presented them in conjunction with the
annual operating budget. Initial priorities/rankings of CIP projects were accomplished through each
department's unique set of criteria. Projects were then submitted to City Council, where a general
sense of need was applied to determine which projects were funded and which were moved out
to a future year. The negative aspects of this system included 1) an unnecessarily high number
of individual projects; 2) disparate project ranking systems; 3) a relatively high level of confusion
about the CIP system, at both the staff and City Council levels; and 4) a less than optimum level
of project coordination.
The main role of the technical committee was to address some of the problems of the previous
CIP process and implement a more comprehensive and analytical process and review. The
department directors and the assistant city manager served as the technical review committee,
since these individuals had the broadest perspective and understanding of the various needs of
the city.
The first step in the development of this new CIP process was the creation of a project submittal
procedure to be utilized by all departments. The main component of this submittal procedure was
the development of a standardized CIP project request form. The purpose of the request form
(besides indicating requested expenditure amounts) was to ensure that a project request was fully
described and justified. Also, the form provided a method to evaluate the future impact of the
project on the operating budget, any companion projects, and possible alternatives. This
standardized CIP request form was distributed to the departments in February.
In late April, the CIP project request forms were received by the technical committee for review.
The technical committee then developed a standardized project evaluation form. The evaluation
form was used as a basis to prioritize a project request based on an agreed upon criteria. The
evaluation form was a way to analyze a project's impact and relationship on such factors as: 1)
public health and safety; 2) legal requirements; 3) protection of capital stock; 4) economics; 5)
operating budget; 6) life expectancy; 7) adopted plans; 8) cost benefits; and 9) public support.
Beginning in May, the CIP technical committee began the process of evaluating the various CIP
project proposals. The methodology involved a presentation of each project by a staff member of
the requesting department, and the use of the project evaluation form. Each member of the
committee scored the presented projects according to their own perspective.
Once scored, the project was ranked in the appropriate funding source (general fund, roadway
impact fee fund, utility fund, crime control, etc.) based on the score received. The resulting ranked
project list was then reviewed by the technical committee to ensure that there were no obvious
flaws in the ranking system. The technical committee then reviewed the dollar amount available
in each fund and recommended the projects to be funded in the upcoming fiscal year (FY 01-02).
Unfortunately, the funds available in the first year of the CIP do not provide for all the requests
submitted for the upcoming fiscal year. As a result, a number of projects had to be moved into out
years. However, the CIP technical committee believes that the projects recommended for funding
in the upcoming fiscal year best represent the capital needs of the community as a whole.
An initial financial benefit of this new process is that, upon careful review by each department
before submitting their respective CIP forms, a large percentage of the projects were able to be
consolidated into single projects (that could be bid upon by a single contractor). Along with the
sheer reduction in the number of projects, significant cost savings were realized by combining
similar projects into one. It is believed that the formation of the CIP technical committee
represents a proactive approach to addressing and prioritizing the capital needs of the citizens of
Southlake.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
September 6, 2001
Page 2
FY 2001-02 TO FY 2005-06
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
FY 2001/02-FY 2005106
Capital Improvements Program Calendar
February 5th -
Presentation of the CIP Program to Department Directors
and assign the CIP Technical Review Committee.
February 81h-
CIP Technical Committee final review of packet and
schedule.
February 15th -
Finalized CIP packet distributedirectors. Set up
the p Directorslto inform them of
meeting with
the changes to the CIP process.
Apri116th-
Completed CIP Project Request
department priority
Planning Departmenteach
ranking).
April 19th -
CIP Technical Committrevixlicomews formsfor accuracyand
he
completeness. Returnp forms
departments (if necessary).
May 1st-
All revised CIP forms are returned to the Planning
Department.
June -July
CIP Technical Committee reviews project requests and
if
ranks projects. (Interview department directors
necessary).
August -Sept.
Technical Committee completes the CIP Request Booklet
to distribute to City Council.
September-
City Council work session.
September
City Council public hearing on the CIP.
or October
FY 2001/02 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program
CIP Request Submittal Procedure
The five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) serves as the major planning guide for
City of Southlake's expenditures for major capital facilities and equipment. It is primarily based
on the physical needs" of the City identified in the Parks Master Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan,
the Water and Sewer Master Plan, and the Trail System Master Plan. It is also made up of
projects that meet a community need or service, but are not address a documented City policy or
plan.
The five-year plan for capital projects is reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission
and then recommended to the City Council for their approval. The City Council subsequently
approves the five-year Capital Improvements Plan, as well as the annual CIP budget for projects
funded in the next fiscal year.
The first year of the Capital Improvement Program is called the Capital Budget, and is
appropriated in the same manner as the annual operating budget of the City. Funds for projects
are appropriated on an annual basis; projects scheduled for subsequent years are approved for
planning _pum2o s only and do not receive expenditure authority until they are part of the Capital
Budget.
General Information
What is a Capital Project?
A capital project is a project requiring a minimum expenditure by the City of at least $5,000,
which generally has a useful life of 10 or more years, and which meets one of the following
criteria:
1. Provides for the acquisition or construction of any physical facility for the community to
include consultant or professional services related to acquisition or construction.
2. Provides for the acquisition of equipment for any physical facility when first constructed
or acquired.
3. Provides for the acquisition of land or an interest in land.
4. Provides for the construction of public utilities or roadways.
5. Funds expenditures, including additions to existing facilities, which increase the square
footage or value of a facility.
6. Funds expenditures for major maintenance or replacement projects on existing facilities.
FY 2001/02 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program
2
CIP Form (See page 7)
Requests forms are available on the L: drive, or on diskette upon request from the Planning
Department. The materials are in Microsoft Word and Excel format, and include the following:
Capital Project Request Forms with which the department uses to request projects for
the next five (5) fiscal years. (1•612 form/project request -dot.
Expenditure Spreadsheet, which break out the requested funding for each project is an
excel worksheet that has been imported into the document.
If you are unable to access the forms, or have questions, please contact the Planning Department
at extension 2046.
Which Projects Require a CIP Request Form to be Submitted?
All proiects (including project requests from Community Services and DPS) need a request
form, regardless of their status as a new, revised or continuation project; and irrespective of
current funding limitations.
Additionally, request forms are required for any re i onal proiects in which the City is
participating.
Is Any Other Information Required to be Submitted?
Yes. The facilities standards and other relevant information used as a basis for the requests. For
example, the Parks Master Plan has established criteria for the location of new parks and facility
needs. It is hoped that in the near future that the City will develop a Community Facilities Plan,
which will incorporate each department's facilities standards and identified needs. These
standards will be used as the basis for justifying and evaluating future CIP requests.
Where, When and How Are the Request Forms Submitted?
Completed forms and your department's ranking are due back to the Planning Department's
Office by April 16, 2001. Please submit a hard copy of all of your request forms, as well as
the computer files used to generate them. The computer files may be posted either to your
department's subdirectory or sent to the Planning Department on diskette.
How Do I Use the Request Forms ? (See Request Form Page 71
Open the files through Windows Explorer.
Use one request form per project.
FY 2001/02 - FY 2005/06 Capital Improvements Program
3
General Instructions for Completing the Main Bow (Tex0of Each CIP Request Form
(See Request Form Page a:
Fill in each request form as described below. The "Questions Asked by the CIP Technical
Committee When Reviewing Projects," found on page 9, may provide additional helpful
guidelines for preparing project requests.
Delete any extra space between sections in the text area so that the completed form
retains the same basic layout as a blank form.
The text area is formatted in columnar format. If, as you are typing, the last subheadings
move off the page, use the delete key to return these subheadings to the text area.
Proiect Name:
Enter brief project title at the top of the form. Use only the allotted line and do not press enter
after typing. (Backspace to delete).
Department Contact and Department:
Enter the name and location (department) of project contact person. Example: "D. Sanders,
Planning"
Proiect Dates:
Enter the project's estimated start and completion dates. Please note that the beginning and/or
ending date may extend beyond the scope of this five-year CIP. If this is an ongoing project,
indicate "ongoing."
Proiect Status:
Check the appropriate box, according to the following criteria:
New Request - A project for which funding has not previously been requested.
Continuation Request - A previously approved project that has not changed in any
aspect of the request and for which continued funding is required.
ReplacementlMajor Rehabilitation -A project that results in the replacement or the major
rehabilitation of an existing capital project. Funds for the standard maintenance of a CIP
project should not be a request.
FY 2001/02 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program
4
Proiect Type:
• Mandated Projects - needed to meet federal, state or City requirements. Examples
include ADA Facility Modifications.
• Projects Addressing a Documented City Policy or Plan - meet identified community
needs specified in adopted planning documents such as the Thoroughfare Plan, Master
Water and Sewer Plan, the Master Trail Plan, Impact Fee CIP, etc. Examples include
new parks, waterlines, fire and police stations, trails and road improvements.
• Projects Meeting Other Community Needs/Services - a "catch all" category for projects
meeting a community need or service, but which do not meet the criteria for mandated
projects, nor address a documented County policy or plan. These projects typically
addresses a need identified by the submitting agency.
Project Description:
Provide a brief description of the project in the space directly below the "Project Description"
heading.
Location/Site Status:
Indicate the approximate location of the project. Attach a location map to each of the CIP
request.
Proiect Justirication:
Enter a brief justification for the project which explains: a) the need for the project; b) what it is
expected to accomplish; c) how the benefits of the project will outweigh the costs. Provide
associated workload data to justify need if applicable. Additionally, if the project is mandated
or addresses a City policy or plan, cite the appropriate mandate or relevant policy/plan in this
section. If the project meets other community needs/ services, its justification should be
addressed in this section.
Companion Proiect:
Are there any other CIP projects requests that are related to this request? For instance, any
infrastructure (i.e. water, sewer & roads) for a new facility would be considered a companion
project.
Alternatives/Impact if Not Completed. -
Briefly list alternatives to funding the project and describe the potential impact to the community
and citizens if the project is not funded, i.e., what will the community lose?
FY 2001/02 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program
5
Annual Impact on the Operating budget: Reflects the project's potential impact on the City's
operating budget. These costs represent CUMULATIVE ADDITIONAL costs to the City for
operating the project, net of any potential savings. In addition, any CUMULATIVE
ADDITIONAL staff members required to maintain or operate the project must be identified in
this section.
Revenue generator: Please indicate if the project will create revenue for the City. If so,
estimate amount.
FY 2001/02 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program
6
YKUJLU 11<_tQUtN I PUKM-rLAUt I I I Lt HtF .
Project Contact: New Request? Mandated Project?
Department: Continuation? Documented ProjectlNeed?
Project Dates: Replacement/ Other Cmty. Need/Service?
Project Description:
Location:
Project Justification:
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Will this project generate revenue?
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars) -THIS IS AN EXCEL SHEET IMPORTED INTO THE DOCUMENT
PRIOR FY01/02 FY02/03 FY03/04 FY04/05 FY05/06 GRAND
FUNDING TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
2. Land Acquisition
3. Site Improvement and Utility
4. Construction
5. Furniture and Equipment
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
2. Impact Fees
3. TIF
4. Utility Fund
S. SPDC Funds
Crime Tax Funds
FY 2001/02 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program
7
General Instructions for Comyletin the he Expenditure Spreadsheet of the CIP Request
Form (See Form Page 7)
All project financing data is entered into tables on the Excel spreadsheet that has been imported
into the CIP Request form.
How Do I Use This Spreadsheet?
• Use one table per project request.
• Please identify each table in the spreadsheet by project name.
• Consult the engineering guidelines on page 25 to help determine facility specifications,
project cost and timing.
What Do the Rows and Columns Mean?
Columns:
1. "Project Total" - Grand total project cost, including all prior allocations (from the
"Prior" column), the annual amounts requested over the five year period FY 01/02 -
05/06, PLUS any additional funding needed beyond FY 05/06.
2. "Prior" - Prior -year appropriations.
3. Columns FY 01/02 through FY 05/06 - Annual funding amounts.
Rows:
Project Cost
1. "Planning and Design" - Planning, architectural, engineering and any environmental
costs.
2. "Land Acquisition" - All costs related to land and right-of-way acquisition.
3. "Site Improvements and Utility" -All costs associated with utilities, drainage,
environmental improvements, signage, traffic signal or road improvements.
4. "Construction Costs"- All cost associated with building and/or installing a project.
5. "Furniture and Equipment" -Cost for adequately furnishing a building or facility to
allow it open.
FY 2001/02 - 2005106 Capital Improvement Program
8
CIP PROJECT RANKING FORM
Total
c I WeightlIM
Score
ul ll
L a
m Priority
E
cc
Z
4-1
L)
�O
L
a.
M M M Ic.) IM N N
a a a
C U
m u D-
s
E
V
C
0 C'
rn
"
0.
E UcD
c
u,
aci
m
.Y 0 O
E
i
o .�'
_ >
�a0)
T V
0 -0
U m
rm
y
r Y
g T
C
E
m p
m
C
N
x a)
a)
c
-c 0m
` D
p
z a
a d
Z a`
a)
c
v
m
m
O O
7
E N
c c
m
> r;
O °
�
U ,C
O
CL�
Y
Q
E°
7
0)-
C
-_ a) m
C
0 U y
'O
C
•Q
.C:
a a
a
E
a c, .� a m d
C
N
a)
>
N
(D d
m
m o
m m
>. C
a) p
O
'CODU
_
N
a)t
`� N
am
y m
'-
a)
O Z
a)
�' y0
C
= °
CD
a)
'o
O 0
o CL
o m
a r a•3
E
a•-
T
r V1 O
N
tm
a)
�a E
m
tU0 a)
O�
t
m
°-'
o N
�
M, w o
° rn m
rn a o>
>°
a
M
O
d U
r •N p
p a 0 y
0
�
'Q `0
:` LL
� .E
m
N O
L
O
U C a)
_ 7 O C
a.
CL
N
a 0
U) m o m
�.. j
3 m E 0
E
a) aa))
U 7
U ti
N la
75
N U 9U
a+
m w a) i
v aci
N
a y
a9?
a
d
Q
c
d)
fA
d
c
R
E
m
m
=
a
a
o
c
m
U
>
O
d
O
C
R
(D
C
U
O
_
o
L
U
m
=
U
) U
O
c
::
O O
U
L)
a'
w
a rn
w
N
a
a m m
m
U
m
C L
C O
c
V
U
T
N
t= O
c
C C
O
0) _
N
E n o
N 9
a
a)
N C
m C
E N
O U) N
w
O
.�
U m
U U
C
D c
\O
N �•'
a)O. NO
O T
- 0
a)
C C C
y
d
- C U
O
m C
C
3 C c'
c m
,
c c
E
lCO
O
U) w
N a) E Y
a1
12"
m o
ur
a 3 w
3
w
c
r
m
0
3
m o =
o
E
E
5
a1
U
N
N
O m
T
7
°
3
N
a) O
co
y) U
`o
N
c am
U
U
� � O
N
aN+
N )11
C
c
E� C
o ur
0
CO10ma)
7-E16
(Dca
`mm>
v.N
�i�
�w
YY
Q)
m
0
O) .�. 7 LC
O`
_ m
a) p
'y O .N
C
y m 7 N
>i
c�
�, U N_
Y a
N N
O
0)) 0 E
IDU o w m
o
a0i
°
m�
0 0_ E
`o
c 0> 0 m
2m E
LO
N
a
a o
c
a c°>
>
w `o
Y 3
v
°
c a) "mc
rn
r_
c
m
U
C
c
°
` a
0
a� C a
a-v
E•C
C =
° T O
0 E
o c Y
ma)
2
N
C N
L
m0
O
y
C_ 'm
0 0
0d
a)3
TO
N o a T
Ua)
Ec
N
C
N
OU
•N
V1
.N.
w0•p
0
N
- 'X ° C 7a
U
Q m O_ m UCVOQm_�ER
nQ
a_
O '"zm..
► 'N
❑.0
U)
a)
Ttmm
c
C
0
O
c
c o
d
d
m
E
d a
oa
J
a H
N IN
uimlu!jm
o�
LL ca
CD
c
�C
IL0
a
A
Total
Weight
N
N
N
Q.
Score
a�
ca Pri rityl
m
m
m
U
L
N
Qi
.D
3
L N
N
Q�
U =
_
n 0
v
O a)
.N
> C
U
O
a o_
II. O
e
C
so m
C)Cu
O N
O
E N
O)
N
C 7
N
c a)
'O
C
a7
a
E
a) 10 =
w .o
N
-,
Q' U
O m 'V
D- f>0 .�
o y
Z b
J
a)
.D
O
C
C
m
U
C
N
U) N
a) 7
c 0-
C:
O U
M
d
o
K--
U
U
U
U
U
� C
U
a1 lV
�_
a C
a)
Y
m
m o
a
u,
o
v
a
E
a) rn
a CD
e
C "NO
C
N C
O
C
a) w
d W
C O
Cu N
C
O
U fV
U N
U N E
U .
N
m U
a)
m o
•� 0 _
,U U
Ja
a)
O a)
,a)
_
-0
d C
d C U
d N a
N
v
a)
a 0
c
a c (D
a)
a) rn C
y m >
> C
`o
O U OCD
E
•N 7
a y
z° n o
O
o
0
v
o
0
0v
N
o`
-
a)
c
'0 o
m
>
c o
C o
D
w O
0
U
c
= a
O U
O
E o
u) o
° CD
c�
E
aN
i U
N
w o a
N
a
E
m E
�_ C
C 'n
U aI
Q U
a)
a)
w
m
c mc
_ u
rn
o`
E
o`
E
U m
N a ti
a)
E U .5
a`ai
C T
y 'o w
0
c E"
7
R
e
o E a
o
a
0 0
LL o E
0
r?
a` ° E
C
0
o
d
-
U
Cu
DI
c
a
w
o 'm
Q v
c
°
a. rn
a a
Z
E
w
%- •; =
H
o
i-�
U)
0
C
C
O w
V
C
L)
v
U
d
•O
a+
Cu
T
a
r? =
ar m o
0
0'C
d
-O
d.
U
m
0
d
a U c
a O w
O
E
_E
_C
E
m
01
Q N
CD aci c
C •O
3 .N E
c
n .5 U
a)
w ) N
m
.� N
'O
r N
°a 0
a) D
a O
> a) E
'
U a U
m
-
C a)
fN
m
m o
d
E `0
E aY 3
0
C
o m a o o
c o
N O O U
O) CD
o C
E o 0).- c `� a
3 0
•� N fa O U
E
U A
a
m a 0 c
Cu
m o
c)
a.o o O. r
a
vi
� r
o
CD._o
c
m O
U o a)
O
E
(D a) w V)
lQ
m T o
U
U
C O U
0 °)
O m �v
O N C
CD :3
(D m
° 00
— C
3 U
0 ai
m Y s
N m
a7 O
V C L t
dc)
a
a 'U = c `
o
C
O
a
E
C
a
°
a
a7
T
H
U
Cu
ar
a
w
w
0-
0
W
w
O
W
W
10
I � 0Uwe
r V o
V
N i
�
r E
wc
o
V,
C
U
N
C
Y
C
N
U ZO
Q)
p T
a 0) N
a) O
N cV r-
U o
E mN
O _0 LL
U L
� LL
U T
C 9
L
U
m
H
a
IN
ro
U
L
U
a)
F'-
a_
U
q)
L7�
er
h�(0to(0to�o
t0 t0
M
O
O t0
Loco
a
N
��cn
<rltq*t7
cnM
O
�D�OtO�
^ t0
cl)
r
Q
0•
0•
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
DC
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
d 0
O O
) 0
O d
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O
2
0
O
0
O
0 0
O O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
d
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
d 0
O O
0
O
0 0
O d
O
O
O •
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
O
O O
O
O O
0
0
«>
O L
OOOt-
rOLncDM000f�
O
d
L[)O
d+-
V
C
aCa
Co
OwOO
t_O�l
M
(n
W
0OLO0)
O
U)
O
V
N
OCOMMOOOr
CD
'�
GO LO
N
M LO
cal
CI1
•
r-
O
to
M
EA
M N
EF? 6-
w M
to
CC
N
p)
Efl Efl (f?
N O
E43 N
O
Efl
LO
EA
M (fl
Efl
pj
.-
Efl r ER
69
69
Effl
r 69
EA
Q9. Y)
EH
H4
Efl
(9
j
E fl
Eta
Cj
Efi
(f?
Efl
ER
Efi
uj
'cc
V
Z
0
Z
LL
O
O
N
}
LL
C
O
p
d
U
U
H
U
a
d 0
d
0
N o,
• v
v
U
it
U
' a
U
0
n
�
U
N
o
m
J
a
c
U
-0
a
a
in
N
v
o
c y
_m
a
U
a
upi
m,
CE
�,
v)
•-
o
o
a=
�,
n
,w -
ro
u
c
a
U
v`�
C
co
o
D
a
_
m
J
a)
E
_-
N
4 c
m
n.
c m
U
U
. cn
O
o
c
_
LL
0 ro
a�
(n
¢>
U
°'
p
U
m
.p
O
a
N
O
YCr w
Q
v
ro
O
d
LL
C
O
C O
(n
_O
p
E
N
C
U
U
H O
ro
y
C
U
c
d
c0
c/7
.. O
-p
C
O
U
N
c
U
ro
v
y
-O
C C
c
C
-p
c
E
c
c
O
p
m
ro
L
Y c
a)
d
E
ro
Cc
ro ()
O
D O
E
ro C
E
C
p
a3 C
LL
ct3
c
N
O
U
.N
T
°
O
CC .D
CO >
�
a)
> .°
C E
m
U
`
3
'O
En
rn
ro
L
_y
d
a)
a C
d
ro
d
L�
E
Lu
L U
) O
->
O
L
d
LL
i
p
.0
(n
o
ro
o`
m
o
a
n
ca
p
m=
o
c >
3
co
p
Q
_
S
0
c
N
al
cn
C
C
W 0
c
LL
��
7
al
E
w
-6 3
C
O
�n
E
cz
c
O U
�
Q
O
O
o
0
o
d c
O
U
w
d
E
J=
-O
ro
- .D
c
a)
2
(n
L
U
Y ca
S c
-
ro
c
�•
._
ro
c 0_
m
_
N cz
¢
N
ca
N
U
d
N
Z
O
al
_
- U
O ai
t
Q
a)
>
O
'-0
C t]
U
�_
C
x
O
U J
a
O
C C
7i
ro Lla-2
��
L
O
U) ci
7 C
1`
cz
Z
CZ
rL
U
a
Cl)
a)
E (n
U
C
O
41
a)
N x
a)
('[
O
w U
LL
6U7
Cc
Q)
-p
r
LL
rt+
j
LL
C
C
i
a)
ro
C
C
O
ro
Y
a)
m c
Li
�-
L
O N
(i
(p
C
a it
O
ca
3)
C
Y
Cn
CC -0ro
aO
N
O O
E
E
O
Y
U v
a7
d•
_0
-O
toN
O
~p
U
j Y
F-d
O OC
Y
o
ro
-->
�
ro
C
O
O
L
3
O
L
0
O
N
doC
O
O m
o
in
cn
cn
cn cn
F-
cn U
E-
a
a
o
cm ui
a
a a
(n
cn
a f`
F
�
p
_0 -o
a_0
�
C
n -p
C
a
C C
-o -D
C C
c
a
c
c c
a a~moo
ro
ro
Q.
C
d
CC
LLLL
>
C c
>>
U- LL
C
LL LL
C c
c c
LL
C c
c c>>
LL LL
c
LL
C
LL
>>
LL
LL LL
-
LL
LL LL
LL
LL
LL LL
E
E E
E
a
27
is
Ft w
m
� m_
� Rs
m
m
m
�
� �
`s �u
---
�
p
a7N
al a)a)a7
)
LL
N
C0CD
C7 C7
U C7
C7
C7 C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7 C7
C7 C7
rr
rL
a m
cn
to
cn
to
a
0)
c
m
U
N O
o T
a d O
U o
mo
0 L}i
U L
LL
U
C
U
m
F-
a
7
tp
to
e-
toLOtoaR
try
In
t0
IT
Q
Q
Q
O
(0
LO
tp
O
tov
00
n
(Z
N
O
(D�LnLo
O
to
*-
Z
Z
Z
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Co
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
L o
0
0
0
0
0
LO
C
co
Lo
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
6
0
0
0
It
O
tD
I-
d
-
t`M
00
O
O
O
Lo
zr
Lo
Cl)
W
1-
Lo
O
O
Lo
O
m
O
O
N
Lo
(.o
co
co
O
69
m
f--
(')
•-
Lo
O
Lo
CD
LO
Lo
CO
LU
CD
00
N
r
K?
I-
69
64
LO
-
el).Ef3
f-
co
N
fl
�
It
LO
V
U'x
-
69
00
6s
ffl
LO
1
N
1
N
N
u)'
N
N
N
Q
69
Efl
Efl
ff?
to
69
64
EA
E q
69
LLl
cc
0
z
0
z
LL
O
O
N
}
LL
C
O
;
2
U
ti
U
Cp
a
O
a
II
J
d
c
J
N
CL
(V
a)
.�
_
n-
a
ocz
a
O
=
C
Q
.
M
0-
LLO
Z
0
C C
cn
_0
U
Q
Z
U
in
di
O
LL
rn
'D
c
a
�?
j
m
0
c
cro
w
o
m
L
a>
o
c
m
a
LL
�,
Y
Y
LL
Q
o
s
E
a
Q
cr
g
m
s
d F
o°
a
U
E
U=
U
p
'p
C
_°
3
L
LL
fjocL
X
S
�.
a
i
O
N
N
E
O
7
o
t�
N
(n
L
Y
a'
"a
N
Ln
N~
c
co
0
q
p
(
U
a
q
d
o
E
.0
a
Q
Y
.�
°
U
o
a
0
a)
o
io
t
0
z
raUQ
�'�
v
i
a
.o
>-
o
o
�Y
L-
��cn
LL
p
(nn
ai
o
cl,a�
°
mv°
.Eai
c
N
mc
dc
Q
C0
oLj >
.?LL
0
c
m
CaO
JQF-
CC
F-
-a
70
a
a�QOi
20(D0
m
0
0
o
�
00
ocF-
ammmC7zcn
z
�
80
C.0
R
cnNNO
CD
'O
E>>
L
'O
a
E
_0La
U
0
U
C
U
U
c0
C1
U
c0
U
ro
U
a;
a i
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
7
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
-----
7
_N
-
mL°
n
w
m
m
m
a
a-
n.
a
a
a
�
a
(n
a
U)
a
�
a
----
>
5
j
a
C) .� V
U
� C O
w
N U
a-
a
U Ln
C U
a_ U
S cd O
O .0
c � c
O U Y
a� ) c
E ) W
O COO
U a)
O E
c � 0
c a
U
n O L
O O L)
c
o 0
c ct
m-0
�0U
E U O
u _a)
o -p
a a ro
� m y
o o
r N co
MW
Wil
$ Breakdown by Funding Source
FY 2001-02 CIP Projects
$2.471,000
$ 297609000
$ 290029000
$ 890009000
Roadway Impact Fee
Water Impact Fee
Sewer Impact Fee
General Fund
Utility Fund
629533,000
$ 190739000
TOTAL = $18,8395000
City of Soutblake , Texas
SPDC Fund Technical Committee's
Proposed Capital Improvements Program
FY 2001-02 Through FY 2005-06
$ Breakdown by Project Type
FY 2001-02 CIP Projects
Q A A^I A a a
$2 976 a
$156 8 3 950 0
$2 98 74 950 0
- Drainage Projects
- Miscellaneous Projects
Traffic Management Bond
Street Projects
Sanitary Sewer
- Water Projects
Community Services
0
96009000
64,000
TOTAL = $18,83900
City�Southlake Texas
Technical Committee's
Proposed Capital Improvements Program
FY 2001-02 Through FY 2005-06
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Request Forms
SECTION I - DRAINAGE PROJECTS
1-1 Dove Creek Drainage Improvements
1-2 Miscellaneous Drainage
1-3 South Kirkwood Branch Channel Improvements
1-4 Stormwater Phase H
1-5 Versailles Channel (Install 2-7'x3' Culverts)
SECTION II - MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
2-1 Developer Reimbursement for Oversizing Utilities
2-2 Public Works Center Improvements
2-3 Sidewalk along Various Roadways
SECTION III - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT BOND PROGRAM
3-1 TMB Proposition One (Intersection Improvements and Deceleration Lanes)
3-2 TMB Proposition Two (SH 114 Urban Design Construction)
3-3 TMB Proposition Three (Hike/Bike Trails)
SECTION IV - STREET PROJECTS
4-1 Brewer Road (Florence Dr to 1200 ft. South)\
4-2 Brumlow Construction (Continental to SH 26)
4-3 Crooked Lane (S. Kimball to Nolen Dr.)
4-4 Durham School Road (White Chapel to Shady Oaks)
4-5 E. Bob Jones Reconstruction (N White's Chapel to 4200 ft. East)
4-6 E. Continental (Brumlow to Crooked) (Rehabilitation))
4-7 E. Continental (South Carroll to Byron Nelson)
4-8 Florence Road Rehab (Pearson to Randol Mill)
4-9 Silverwood Reconstruction (1300 Ft N. of Continental to 750 ft. East)
4-10 Johnson Road Rehabilitation (Pearson Lane to Randol Mill)
4-11 Miscellaneous Pavement Rehabilitation (Including Mission Hills)
4-12 N. Carroll Ave. (Federal Way to SH 114) (Ultimate Roadway) (12" Water Line)
4-13 N. Pearson Ln. Rehab (1709 to Florence)
4-14 N. White Chapel (SH 114 to Sweet Street) (Ultimate Roadway)
4-15 N. White Chapel (Emerald Blvd. to SH 114) (Ultimate Roadway)
4-16 Pavement Management System Implementation
4-17 Private Street Reconstruction
4-18 S. Carroll Ave. (FM 1709 to Breeze Way) (Ultimate Roadway)
4-19 S. Kimball from FM 1709 to Heritage Business Park/E. Continental from Crooked to S.
Kimball
- 1 -
SECTION IV - STREET PROJECTS (Continued)
4-20 S. Kimball (Crooked Lane to Continental) (Half of Ultimate)
4-21 S. White Chapel (FM 1709 to Continental) (Ultimate Roadway)
4-22 Saddle Ridge Rd., Sam Bass Ridge, Soda Ridge, Shumaker, Sunshine, Sweet Street
Rehab.
4-23 Shady Oaks (FM 1709 to Durham Jr. High)
4-24 T. W. King Rehab (Bob Jones to Lake Grapevine)
4-25 T. W. King Rehab. (SH 114 to South of Bob Jones), 12" Water Line (P.S. #2 to West
Bob Jones)
4-26 Union Church/S. Pearson Reconstruction; 12" Water Line along Union Church and S.
Pearson
4-27 W. Bob Jones Rehab & 12" Water Line (N.White Chapel to T.W. King)
4-28 W. Highland Rehab (SH 114 to White Chapel)
4-29 FM 1709 At Nolen Drive Traffic Signal
4-30 Carlisle Reconstruction (Caroll Avenue to Rainbow Street)
4-31 Oak Lane Paving and Drainage
4-32 Dove Rd. (Sh114 to Kirkwood)
SECTION V - SANITARY SEWER PROJECTS
5-1 Casey Court (Oaks Addition) Sewer
5-2 N-2 Sewer Interceptor
5-3 Quail Creek Estates, Woodland Heights Sewer
5-4 S. Kimball S-7 Sewer Line
5-5 Garden Addition, Heatherwood Estates, Hershaw Estates, Loma Vista (West Side), Royal
Oaks Estates, Twin Creek Estates Sewer
SECTION VI - WATER PROJECTS
6-1 12" Water Line along E. Dove from N. Carroll to N. Kimball
6-2 12" Water Line along E. Highland from N. Carroll to N. Kimball
6-3 12" Water Line along N. Carroll from Dove to Highland
6-4 12" Water Line along N. Peytonville from FM 1709 to Raven Bend
6-5 12" Water Line along Randol Mill from Florence to FM 1709
6-6 12" Water Line along S. Carroll from FM 1709 to E. Continental
6-7 12" Water Line and Sewer Line along Shady Oaks from Highland to Dove
6-8 20" Trans. Water Line Along SH 114 from Town Ctr. to N. White Chapel
6-9 Florence 1.5 MG Elevated Water Tank
6-10 N. Peytonville 8" Water Line (Low Pressure Plane)
6-11 Redundant Water Supply (Through Keller along Florence to P. S. #2)
SECTION VII - PUBLIC SAFETY
7-1 North DPS Facility
7-2 Fire Pumper in the North DPS Facility
7-3 Fire Pumper in the East DPS Facility
7-4 Ambulance in the West DPS Facility
7-5 Ambulance in the North DPS Facility
-2-
SECTION VIII - COMMUNITY SERVICES
8-1 Bob Jones Development
8-2 Timarron-Richards Pond Enhancement
8-3 Recreation Center
8-4 Girls' Softball Complex
8-5 Nature Center Improvements
8-6 Royal and Annie Smith Park Improvements
8-7 Sand Volleyball Courts
8-8 Natatorium
8-9 Matching Fund (Grant)
8-10 Joint Use
8-11 Special Projects
8-12 New Community Park
8-13 Parks Maintenance Facility
8-14 Baseball Field Construction/Realignment
8-15 Bicentennial Park Landscape Improvements
8-16 Community Building Removal
8-17 In -Line Hockey Rink # 2
8-18 Koalaty Park Development
8-19 Lacrosse Facility: Lighting of CIS Field
8-20 Trail Plan Implementation
8-21 Sheltonwood Park Improvements
8-22 Equestrian Facility
8-23 Noble Oaks Park Development
8-24 Skate Park
8-25 BMX Facility
8-26 Lonesome Dove Park Playground Replacement
8-27 Working Farm
8-28 Family Leisure Aquatics Center
8-29 Farhat Property Improvements
8-30 In -Line Hockey Rink Cover
8-31 City Portal Implementation
-3-
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
DOVE CREEK DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjectlNeed? Y
Project Dates:FY 02103 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. NeedlService? N
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves performing channel improvements
and culvert crossings along Dove Creek, including slope
stabilization, culvert crossings, and channel widenings to
accommodate the 100 year flood. Dove Creek has been
identified in previous drainage studies as in need of
improvement.
Location:
Dove Creek from Dove to SH 114.
Project Justification:
To provide hydraulic improvements to channel, enlarge
drainage structures and provide erosion control,
especially, immediately downstream of SH114
improvements.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternativesl7mpact if not completed:
Once the Dove Creek culvert under SH 114 is
complete, these improvements will be needed to
function together with the SH 114
improvements.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The annual impact to the operating budget is
$7100.00
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
" •'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
ilk• 10
It I
• • � •
--
111
---
111
:5. Furrfiture and Equipment
EffWTM
11 I Dili I
- . � •
11
111
---
11
14. Utility Fund
SPDC Funds
16. Crime Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 1-1
Dove Creek Drainage Improvements
DISCLAIMER
N
'is data has been compiled for The
of Southlake. Various official E
_,a unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy NO SC210
ofsaid data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
MISCELLANEOUS DRAINAGE
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates:FY 01102 — 05106 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This project includes curb and gutter replacement, If not completed, groundwater problems may
underdrain, localized pavement replacement, and various decrease the life expectancy of city streets, and
culvert and drainage system improvements in various the nuisance of continuously running water in
locations as the need arises. gutters and ponding water will continue.
Location:
These locations include but are not limited to: Steven
Jobe Property, Oakhurst Drive, Southview, & Myers
Meadows.
Project Justification:
To resolve drainage concerns throughout the entire City.
These drainage concerns, often times, are beyond the
capabilities of the Public works Department to resolve
with City forces. Projects may include channel
improvements, installation of storm sewer pipe,
construction of storm sewer inlets and reconstruction of
small portions of curb and gutter or pavement to relieve
standing waters.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCEEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
none.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
••ICI'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
��• •It
',2. Land Acquisition
" h13. Wovenient. •Utility
------�
• 1 •
11
11
11
11
11
111
5. Furniture and E(#Mmt
16. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
I•
11
11
11
11
11
111
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 1-2
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
SOUTH KIRKWOOD BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This project involves various channel improvements Flooding of adjacent land is possible without
along the South Kirkwood Branch to relieve flooding these improvements
problems for adjacent property owners, including
culverts, slope protection, and channel excavation.
Location:
South Kirkwood Branch Durham Elementary
/Intermediate School to SH 114.
Project Justification:
To provide hydraulic improvements to channel, enlarge
drainage structures and provide erosion control.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCBEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The annual impact to the operating budget is
$3400.00
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
,•ICI•
1 1
1 1
1 1
11
1 1•
•'�• •It
MIU0101
' • 1 •
--
11
-_-
11
1 11URAJ11 01 Dili 0-------
MINIMUM
------0
-_----0
•Funds'6.
------0
CniTr Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 1-3
South Kirkwood Branch Channel Im rovementrl�&9 s
V
FOX GLEN
F
" RAV UX
C
�T
op
O� 1
ID S
CT
J c
0
D o
I
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data. No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
STORM WATER PHASE II
Project Contact: Pedram Farahnak New Request? Y Mandated Project? Y
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102-03104 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description: AlternativeVImpact if not completed.
Storm Water Phase II implementation is a program Fines will be levied by the Environmental
mandated by the Federal Clean Water Act. It involves Protection Agency or the Texas Natural
developing "best management practices" in the areas of Resource Conservation Commission if this
operations and capital improvement projects to protect the program is not implemented (There are no other
quality of storm water. alternatives available).
Location:
City Wide
Project Justification:
The Storm Water Phase II Final Rule is mandated by the
Federal Clean Water Act. A master plan will be required
as a guideline to communicate compliance steps to the
public. This funding request is to develop the master plan
and a system for implementation of the program.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCTIEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The total amount of program implementation
will be provided by the Master Plan study in FY
002/003.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
A funding mechanism for the program will be
explored in the master plan.
17/1 � 11►1 I11111 N . � I11111 �-------
1�11►1 IJ 1►(!l.`:�1 C 111 I11111
-------
Mill
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 1-4
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
VERSAILLES CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates:FY 03104 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
This project involves installing two Tx3' culverts and The detention pond in this area will remain, and
removing the detention facility at Old Union Elementary drainage maintenance problems will continue if
School to improve drainage conditions south of this project is not completed.
Continental.
Location:
Old Union Elementary School and behind Plum Creek
Manor
Project Justification:
A drainage problem exists that requires the addition of
these culverts to improve conditions in the area.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
MENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The annual impact to the operating budget is
$500.00
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
3. Site hWovenient ..Litility
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 1-5
Versailles Channel
DISCLAIN ER
This data has been compiled for The
N
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to E
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is S
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data. No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS FOR OVERSIZING UTILITIES
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates:FY 01102 — 05106 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
These funds would be dedicated to providing staff and
council the ability to reimburse developers for the
oversizing of water and sewer lines to meet the
requirements of the master water and sewer plans in cases
where the developer is not required to provide the
ultimate size of the line to serve his/her development.
Location:
various throughout the city
Project Justification:
These funds are needed to ensure that the water and sewer
systems are installed according to the appropriate concept
plans.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This is a less expensive way of upgrading
utilities when development is in progress. If
these funds are not made available, the city
would be required to pay the full amount for
installing water and sewer lines.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Staff has estimated that $100,000 per year is
needed for this item based upon the amount of
reimbursement granted in previous years. These
projects are proposed to be funded from the
Water/Sewer fund.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This item could indirectly generate revenue in
that it provides incentive for developers to bring
taxable business to the city.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
0
2. Land Acquisition
0
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction
100
100
100
100
100
500
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL=
5W
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
100
100
100
100
100
500
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL=
500
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 2-1
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
PUBLIC WORKS CENTER IMPROVEMENTS
Project Contact: Mike Patterson I New Request? N I Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102 —03104 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. NeedlService? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves providing upgrades for the public
works center. The FY 01/02 improvements include
covered parking for vehicles and equipment, paving the
remainder of the parking lot, and providing landscaping
and irrigation for the site. FY 02/03 improvements
include completing the brick and stucco fagade for the
building. FY 03/04 improvements include installing a car
wash facility.
Location: Public Works Center (East Continental)
Project Justification:
To continue to develop and upgrade the Public Works
Facility to improve its function and assure that the facility
meets all the City's codes and ordinances.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The public works center will not meet applicable
zoning regulations if this project is not
completed. Furthermore, dust control is
connected to the Federal "Clean Air Act". The
city may be subject to fines if the proper
facilities are not installed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
none.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
'•III'
'1 1
��
•1' l
-1 1'•
�,,1
&4 W 0IU IJ I 11] -,Amk 1:181111111 0-------
" hnprovement and'117tility------�
• 1 •
19
�M
•l
1110►1 IJ hCli.Y�l C I � IlU II
-------
•
1M1
�M
,rl�l
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 2-2
Public works Center Improvements
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
SIDEWALK ALONG VARIOUS ROADWAYS
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjectlNeed? N
Project Dates: FY 01102-05106 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. NeedlService? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This item is to allow for construction of sidewalks in
areas where staff has received requests for the installation
of sidewalks, primarily around schools and areas where
sidewalks would improve pedestrian safety.
Location:
Among these locations is along South Peytonville from
Carroll High School to the Stonebury Court.
Project Justification:
To provide sidewalks near schools and other areas along
arterials where pedestrians traffic is high or denied. May
or may not be part of trail system.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
A continued lack of sidewalk facilities and a
potential compromise in pedestrian safety would
be the result of this project not being funded.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
None
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
10
10
10
10
10
1 50
2. Land Acquisition
0
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction
100
100
100
100
100
500
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
550
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
110
110
110
110
110
550
2. Impact Fees
0
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 2-3
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT BOND PROGRAM --PROPOSITION ONE
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102-02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
For FY 01/02, provide intersection improvements and
purchase right-of-way for the addition of deceleration
lanes for those intersections along FM 1709 for which
bonds were not sold during the May, 1999 bond sale. For
FY 02/03, complete construction of all intersection
improvements
Location
Intersection improvements — Pearson Lane at FM 1709
Deceleration Lanes (ROW only) — Southridge
Lakes/Waterford, Byron Nelson/Diamond,
Commerce, Lakecrest, Westwood, Stonelakes,
Timberlakes, Foxborough, Miron, Meadowlark,
Bank, Ginger, Brock, Bicentennial Park, E. Jellico,
W. Jellico,
Project Justification: To provide increased level of
service at all major intersections.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCBEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The major intersections along FM 1709 will
continue to be congested and level of service at
these intersections will decline as traffic
increases.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The impact to the operating budge is estimated at
$1500.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
„I•I•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
QI�� It
.1• • • •
�..
11
----
..
3. Site IrTVovement and Utility
• • - • . • N -
--_---0
-----�off
' 1
MEN 01 I 1 Milli
-------
6. Crime Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 3-1
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT BOND PROGRAM -PROPOSITION TWO
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102-02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
Provide urban design landscaping for State Highway 114 The White Chapel and Carroll sections of SH
construction. The 1995 Corridor Study recommended 114 that will not be built to mach the urban
these enhancements. design landscaping theme that is being installed
in the Dove/Carroll sections.
Location
The White Chapel and Carroll sections of State
Highway 114
Project Justification:
To provide landscaping enhancement to the SH 114
Corridor to beautify main entrances into Southlake.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDTIU ESCHMUIE (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
This project will have no impact on the operating
budget.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
" •'
It I
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
f' • It
•
3. Site hiprovenrnt and Utility
• 1 •
� 1
•11
•11
---®
-------
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 3-2
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT BOND PROGRAM -PROPOSITION THREE
Project Contact. Mike Hutchison New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01/02-02/03 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
Provide 8 foot hike and bike trails along 1709, and White There will be less linkage of points of interest
Chapel. such as Bicentennial Park, Bob Jones Park if this
project is not completed.
Location
FM 1709 from Pearson to SH 114, White Chapel
from SH 26 to Bicentennial Park
Project Justification:
To provide safe facilities for pedestrian and bicycle
activity, and to connect points of interest for pedestrians
and bicyclists.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCBEDUL.E: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The impact on the operating budget is estimated
at $5000.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
"I,1'
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1•
V• Is
/' D1 1 I 1
-------
2. Land Acquisition
i• 1
-----
i• 1
RAW= U • •
------�
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
1 1 I 1
-------
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 3-3
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
BREWER ROAD
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjecdNeed? N
Project Dates: FY 05106 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
Construct approximately 1200 feet of Brewer Road from
Florence Drive to the end of the existing gravel road.
Location Brewer Road
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway to eliminate maintenance
problems.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
Maintenance of the existing gravel road is
becoming more difficult due to the age of the
facility. Staff must be able to have access to the
water tower by way of brewer road.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
Diel 1 1 DI 111J I-------
' hi-provernent • •Lhility------�
OWN •
------�
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-1
Brewer Road
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official ` E
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy N o Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
BRUMLOW CONSTRUCTION FROM CONTINENTAL TO SH 26
Project Contact. Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates :FY 04105 Replacement/ Y Other Cutty. Need/Service? N
Major Re/tab?
Project Description:
This project involves widening Brumlow to the ultimate
street section. The Thoroughfare Plan calls for Brumlow
from Continental to SH 26 to be a 5 lane arterial.
Brumlow is surrounded mostly by industrial land uses,
with some residential adjacency along the north portion of
the corridor.
Location: Brumlow from Continental to State Highway
26
Project Justification:
To provide ultimate sections to handle increased traffic
congestion which is anticipated to increase more with
completion of intersection improvements at
Brumlow/SH26, S Carroll/Continental and S
Carroll/FM 1709.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
As traffic volumes increase, the level of service
of this facility will decline if the project is not
funded. Brumlow is one of only two outlets to
SH 26 in the eastern portion of Southlake.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
"; '
1 1
1 1
1 1
11
1 1•
�• •I
1
1N D101 1 1 DI6.
----_--
3. Site Improvement and Utilitv
5. Furniture and EciuiDnient
Other (Please -=lain on attached sheet)
OEM
1 I 1 1
-------
1. General
•Lftili1y
TlF
Fund
L
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-2
Brumlow Construction
llACLA1MER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to E
zather this information. Even,effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of N*
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy NO Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
CROOKED LANE
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates :FY 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This project involves the rehabilitation of 2500 linear feet This section of Crooked Lane is quite old and in
of Crooked Lane due to the poor condition of the extremely poor condition. If it is not
pavement. rehabilitated, it will become virtually impossible
for staff to maintain.
Location:
Crooked Lane from South Kimball to Nolen Drive
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior sections) for safety and
reduce maintenance costs.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
3. Site hqyoverricnt and Utility
5. Furniture and Eqwpn-rnt
!6. Other (Please explain on attached
16. Crime Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-3
Durham School Road
0
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
rather this information. Every effort
%as made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
EAST BOB JONES REHAB
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 02/03 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This project involves rehabilitating the existing pavement. The current roadway is deteriorated and in need
East Bob Jones is listed as a C2U collector on the of repair. The pavement will eventually become
Thoroughfare plan. impossible to maintain if these improvements are
not completed.
Location:
East Bob Jones from North White Chapel to 4200 feet
east (to the end of pavement).
Project Justification: Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
To rehabilitate roadway (interior section) to improve (Provide $ impact and explanation):
safety and reduce maintenance costs. Should coincide Since the pavement will be new, this project will
with construction of a new 12" water line, which will have no additional impact on the operating
further deteriorate the roadway. budget for the next 5 years.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain Will this project generate revenue? Y/1V
N N
—XPENDITURE SCBEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
•,I•I•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
f''� •I•
I Site hnprovernent and Lftility------�'
' •
--
• 1
—_—
'
' • • •
11
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
-----��
1 1 I 1
-------
M.
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-5
Crooked Lane
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of SOUthlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
>ather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
DURHAM SCHOOL ROAD FROM WHITE CHAPEL TO SHADY
OAKS
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves constructing 2600 linear feet of a
new 40 foot collector street along the north property line
of Durham Elementary/Intermediate School in right -of
way dedicated by Carroll Independent School District.
There is a significant amount of Drainage infrastructure
needed in this project as well.
Location: Durham School Road from Shady Oaks to
North White's Chapel.
Project Justification:
To provide a city wide collector between Shady Oaks and
White Chapel at the elementary school and junior high
school and allocate traffic on Highland.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
This project will provide relief to congestion
currently being experienced on Highland
between Shady Oaks and White Chapel. This
congestion will continue to cause delays and
decrease levels of service along this portion of
Highland if the project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
N
"I i'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
i';• •It
13. " Improverrent. •Utility------�
• WNUMA •
--
• •
---
• •
5. I " . • Equiprrrnt------�
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
STDSTDC FundsCrime
------�
Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-4
E. Bob Jones Rehabilitation
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for'Ihe
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
EAST CONTINENTAL FROM BRUMLOW TO CROOKED
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 03104 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project is to rehabilitate 3200 linear feet of existing
pavement as a continuation of rehabilitation projects on
other sections of Continental in past years. In addition,
portion of Continental requires the replacement of a
drainage culverts across the roadway.
Location: East Continental from Brumlow to Crooked
Lane
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior sections) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This portion of East Continental will continue to
deteriorate and become virtually impossible to
maintain if the project is not completed.
Annual impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
" •'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
i'�• •It
D11' outI 1
-------
2. Land Acquisition
Site hiprovearnt and Uffiry
1'
M111811111, • • •
---_--�
• • (Please • on •
------�
11 11MM7411 I I pill-------
FA F OR I ME
--ff
-
MUM
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-6
E. Continental Blvd. - Brumlow to Crooked
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
zather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
EAST CONTINENTAL FROM BYRON NELSON TO SOUTH
CARROLL AVENUE
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 03104 Replacement) Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project consists of rehabilitating 2400 linear feet of
the existing pavement (2 lanes) and providing any needed
drainage improvements.
Location East Continental from South Carroll Avenue
to Byron Nelson
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior sections) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This portion of East Continental will continue to
deteriorate and become virtually impossible to
maintain if the project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
" •'
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1.1
1 1.
�•• �
'
1 1 I 15.
-----
Furniture and FAuiRLngnt
Utility Fund
/'Y _/UU1/OL- PY aoo'3/u0 l.apetat impruvenierm riugiun. -r-i
E. Continental Blvd. - S. Carroll to Byron Nelson
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
Lather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the aCCLIMcy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
FLORENCE ROAD REHAB
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjecdNeed? N
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project consists of rehabilitating the existing
pavement section (2 lanes) on Florence Road and
providing necessary drainage improvements
Location: Florence Road from Pearson To Randol Mill.
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior sections) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project is in conjunction with the redundant water
supply project.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
Florence Road is currently in poor condition will
continue to deteriorate and become virtually
impossible to maintain if the project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
,•I•I•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1.
•'�• •I•
3. Site In-provetirnt and Utility
5. Furniture and Equipnrnt
------�
6.- Other (Please explain on attached sheet)_
1 1 I 1
-------
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-8
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
>ather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
SILVERWOOD RECONSTRUCTION
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This Project involves reconstructing 750 linear feet of
Highland Oaks.
Location: Silverwood from 900 feet north of Highland
Oaks extending 600 linear feet west.
Project Justification:
To reconstruct the roadway in order to improve safety and
reduce maintenance costs.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
Sweet street will continue to deteriorate and
eventually become impossible to maintain if this
project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
12. Land Acquisition
3. ' Irnprovenient and LJtihty------�
5. Furniture . • Equipment
------�
6. Other (Please explain on attached shed)
-------
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-9
Silverwood Reconstruction
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
zather this information. Every effort
was made to ensue the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
JOHNSON ROAD REHAB (PEARSON LANE TO RANDOL MILL)
Project Contact. Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates:FY 01102 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves rehabilitating the existing pavement
on Johnson Road and extending 5000 LF of 8" sanitary
sewer on Johnson Road
Location: Johnson Road from Pearson to Randol Mill
Project Justification:
The Johnson Road rehabilitation is a fully funded CIP
road project. During a February Council Meeting, staff
was directed to add funds for the sewer in as an item in
the FY 01 /02 CIP.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
Johnson Road Reconstruction, construction scheduled for
FY 01 /02
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of collars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The council committed this project to the area
residents. The residents in the area will drive on
rough pavement and not have sanitary sewer
service if this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will generate revenue through sewer
connection fees and usage fees.
■
��,1�
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1. 1
1 1•
f'�• •It
PM F-71
• • 1 1•
11
•1
----
'1
- . I •
11
-----
11 I
• . I •
------�
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital improvements Program 4-10
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
zather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
MISCELLANEOUS PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Mandated Project?
Department: Public Works Continuation? Documented Project/Need?
Project Dates: FY 01102 — 05106 Replacement/ Other Cmty. Need/Service?
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project is intended to provide funds to rehabilitate
various roads, particularly concrete streets, with localized
pavement failures as the need arises. This project also
includes improvements to the Mission Hills Estates
Subdivision, a project listed separately in previous CIP
lists.
Location: City Wide
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate sections of pavement that the Public
Works force do not have the capability to accomplish.
These sections throughout the entire City have pavement
failures for a number of different reasons.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCTIEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
Staff will not be able to respond in a timely
manner to citizen requests to repair pavement
failures if this project is not funded.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
This project has no additional impact on the
operating budget.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
/' 1 tena :10111110M6.
-------
5. Furruture and Equipment
Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
------®
1 I I 1
-------
. � •
-®
11
11
11
11
u . :E
------0
•
------0
' •C Funds6.
------0
Crime Tax Ruids
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-11
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
NORTH CARROLL AVENUE FROM FEDERAL WAY TO SH 114
(ULTIMATE ROADWAY) & 12" WATER LINE
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 01102 — FY 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
This project involves designing and constructing the Traffic congestion will increase significantly and
ultimate section (4 lane divided) as depicted by the cause considerable delays if this project is not
Thoroughfare Plan and providing an underground completed prior to the opening of SH 114.
drainage system and 12-inch water line.
Location: North Carroll Avenue from Federal Way to
SH 114
Project Justification:
To provide ultimate section that will provide needed
capacity with the completing of SH 114 improvements and
the N Carroll Ave overpass. Timing is very important.
The completion of the construction of this roadway
should coincide with completion of TxDOT's construction
of SH 114 @ N Carroll Ave.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCBEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
" •'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
!" • It
1. Site Inprovernent.1 •
------�
5. 1 _ . • Equiparnt
-----_�
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
1 1 I N 1
-------
-4. Utility Fund
SPDC Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-12
N. Carroll Ave. / 12" Water Line
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
Cit} of SOUthlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to E
Bather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
NORTH PEARSON LANE REHABILITATION (FM 1709 TO
FLORENCE RD.)
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This Project involves rehabilitating the existing pavement
section (2 lanes) and providing the necessary drainage
improvements.
Location: North Pearson Lane From FM 1709 to
Florence Road
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate the roadway (interior sections) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs. The City of Keller
may participate with is in the cost but we do not know
that for sure.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project is in conjunction with the redundant water
supply project.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
Pearson Lane is in poor condition and will
become difficult to maintain if the project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
N
"I i'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
fly• •It
2. Land Acquisition
i3. Site hriprovenxnt and Utility
WIN 1111
5. Furniture and Equiparnt
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)_
1 I I 1
--_----
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-13
N. Pearson Ln. Rehabilitation
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
E
and unofficial sources were used to
Lather this information. Every effort
,vas made to ensure the accuracy of
S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
NORTH WHITE CHAPEL FROM SH 114 TO SWEET STREET
(ULTIMATE ROADWAY)
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjecdNeed? Y
Project Dates: FY 02103 -03104 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves constructing the ultimate pavement
section of North White Chapel and providing necessary
drainage improvements.
Location: North White Chapel SH 114 to Sweet Street
Project Justification:
To provide ultimate roadway to improve safety, increase
capacity and reduce maintenance cost.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
-.XPENDTTURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This portion of North White Chapel could
experience excessive delays of the proposed
elementary School on White Chapel just north of
Dove if this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
low, I
-��
--
5. Furruture and Equipment
EA ON in
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital improvements Program 4-14
N. White Chapel Blvd. - SH 114 to Sweet St.
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
Lather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
NORTH WHITE CHAPEL FROM EMERALD TO SH 114
(ULTIMATE ROADWAY)
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 01102 — 02103 Replacement) Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves constructing the ultimate pavement
section of North White Chapel (5 Lanes) and providing
necessary drainage improvements.
Location: North White Chapel from Emerald to SH 114
Project Justification:
To provide ultimate roadway to improve safety, increase
capacity and reduce maintenance cost.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
` VENMI'URE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This portion of North White Chapel could
experience excessive delays upon the completion
of the SH 114 project if it is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
" •'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
r' • •It
emu
• Acquisition
lniproven=t and Utihty------�
5. Furr�iture and Equimmt
;6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
'6. Crime Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital improvements Program 4-15
N. White Chapel Blvd. -Emerald to SH 114
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
Lather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
Capital Improvement Program
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This item involves developing an inventory and condition
report for Southlake's entire street network using a
computerized pavement management system.
Location: Entire City
Project Justification:
Current funding levels for preventive maintenance do not
equal the amount of money needed each year for
maintenance. The inventory and condition report should
be completed to determine maintenance needs for the
future and to save money on more costly reconstruction is
preventive maintenance is not performed.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The condition of Southlake's street network will
continue to decline and the maintenance backlog
will continue to increase if this project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
This project will determine the total annual
operating budget need for street maintenance.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
,•ICI•
1 1
1 1
1 1
11
1 1•
�• •I�
o W D10 1 I DI Dili 0-------
3. " h-nprovernent . •Lftility6.
------�
------�
Other (Please explain on attached
------�
16. Cru-ne Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-16
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
PRIVATE STREETS RECONSTRUCTION
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjecdNeed? N
Project Dates: FY 05106 Replacemend Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves the reconstruction of the private
streets below:
Location: Kaitlyn, Lodestar, Maranatha Way, Michael
Drive, Our Lane, Ridgecrest Court, Walnut Grove,
Whispering Woods, Brown
Project Justification:
The council has expressed an interest in assisting the
residents of private subdivisions in the past. The goal is
to improve these roadways for public use although they
are private streets.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
MENDITURE SCIIEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
These streets will continue to deteriorate if the
project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
2. Land
-Acquisition
13. - hiVovernent and LJtihty------�
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
MESHOW,
------�
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-17
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
SOUTH CARROLL AVENUE FROM FM1709 TO BREEZE WAY
(ULTIMATE ROADWAY)
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: Y 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves constructing the west half (2 lanes)
of the ultimate pavement section (4 lanes) for South
Carroll along with the necessary drainage improvements.
South Carroll is identified in the Thoroughfare Plan as a
four lane undivided arterial.
Location: South Carroll from 1709 to Breeze Way (the
west side only)
Project Justification:
To provide the ultimate section by constructing the west
side that is the only part of the ultimate pavement that
does not exist between FM1709 and Continental.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
Increased congestion on South Carroll will be
the result of this project not being completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
N
,•I�1•
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1� 1
1 1•
�I�• It
9/ /' 1 1 rd hi 0-------
• AcqWsition
3. ' hnproverrmt . • Lkility---
--�
•Other (Please explain on . i•sheet)------�
---
-®
11
11 1 1
------EMU
-
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-18
S. Carroll Ave. - 1709 to Breeze Way
^ FOUNTAIN PT J'= Z
K O� �G El� U
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
lather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy NO Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM- S. KIMBALL FROM FM 1709 TO HERITAGE
BUSINESS PARK/ CONTINENTAL FROM CROOKED LANE TO S. KIMBALL
(ULITMATE ROADWAY)
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 02/03 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project consists of completing the ultimate section
for South Kimball. Half of S. Kimball was funded in FY
00/01. The remaining project needed is to construct the
other half of the pavement. Both sides of the road were
designed simultaneously in FY 00/01. The project also
includes constructing the remaining half of the pavement
section from East Continental to Crooked Lane
(scheduled for FY 01/02). This portion of S. Kimball is
listed on the Thoroughfare Plan as a four lane divided
arterial.
Location: South Kimball from FM 1709 to Heritage
Business Park, East Continental from Crooked Lane to
South Kimball.
Project Justification:
To complete the ultimate section between FM 1709 and
Heritage Business Park, as well as East Continental from
Crooked Lane to Kimball Avenue. This reconstruction
will improve safety and reduce maintenance costs.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thotnan& of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
The existing lanes of S. Kimball and Continental
that were converted to the northbound lanes are
in poor condition and will eventually become too
difficult to maintain. Furthermore, many aspects
of the phase one construction (only building the
southbound lanes) are considered temporary and
undesirable for the long term.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
,•ICI•
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1. 1
1 1•
�I,• •�
Imu
,3. Site Iniprovenrnt and Utility
r I . . • I--®---®
• • - •• . r IF IN :•IM------0
•off
--®---®
P110111"Or
------0
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-19
S. Kimball Ave. - 1709 to Heritage Business Park
E. Continental - Crooked to S. Kimball
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial Sources were used to
tather this information. Every effort S
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM- S. KIMBALL FROM CROOKED TO
CONTINENTAL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented ProjectlNeed? Y
Project Dates: FY 01102 Replacemend Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project consists of constructing half of the ultimate
section for South Kimball from Crooked Lane to
Continental. This project will complete construction of
half of the ultimate section from FM 1709 to link with the
existing Kimball in the City of Grapevine, providing
direct access from FM 1709 to SH 26.
Location: South Kimball from Crooked Lane to
Continental.
Project Justification:
To complete half of the ultimate section between FM1709
and Heritage Business Park, This reconstruction will
improve safety and access for the southeast portion of the
city.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
Yes. This project will be combined with the S-7 sewer
extension on South Kimball from Crooked to
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
AlternativeslImpact if not completed:
Indirect access to SH 26 and the CISD stadium
and other property in the area will exist if this
project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
"I.1'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� t
1 1•
•'I,• If
r• • %11T, • UM 0------�
1I IN Bali I-------
01MIRPI all,
CritTr Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-20
S. Kimball Ave. -Crooked Ln. to Continental
ATHLETIC
FACILITY
e
0s\NEs
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
lather this information. Even, effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
SOUTH WHITE CHAPEL FROM FM 1709 TO CONTINENTAL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 03/04 — 04/05 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves constructing the ultimate pavement
section (5 lanes) of South White Chapel and providing
necessary drainage improvements.
Location: South White Chapel from FM 1709 to
Continental
Project Justification:
To provide the ultimate roadway to improve safety and
reduce maintenance.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This portion of South White Chapel could
experience excessive delays and poor level of
services if this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
,•I.1•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
fill• •It
I DI 1
-----_-
n • Acquisition
• • i •
1.1
1.1
5. r • . • Equiprrrnt------
1
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
1 1 I DI I
---
---
OMAN=
------�
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-21
S. White Chapel Blvd. - 1709 to Continental)
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
rather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
SADDLE RIDGE, SAM BASS RIDGE, SODA RIDGE, SUNSHINE,
SWEET STREET, SHUMAKER REHAB
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison I New Request? Y I Mandated Project?
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need?
Project Dates: FY 01102-02/03 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service?
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This project involves rehabilitating the existing pavement These streets are in very poor condition and will
for the following streets, and providing limited drainage become impossible to maintain if the project is
improvements. Design funds are allocated in FY 01/02, not completed.
and consruction funds are allocated in FY 02/03
Location: Saddle Ridge — Bob Jones to Sam Bass Ridge,
Sam Bass Ridge — N. White Chapel to 2500 ft.
East
Soda Ridge — Bob Jones to Sam Bass Ridge
Sunshine — Highland to Dove
Sweet Street — White Chapel to 900 ft. East
Shumaker — Sunshine to 700 ft. North
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway to improve safety and reduce
maintenance costs.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
N
1D11�11►11J1111NDi.��l:l�II11J11�---_-_-_-_-
P.T. myn M •'
------�
• •
•
--=�
: �111�1 IJ 1►(!1.`!�l : � 11 I11111
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-22
h`I
NO
Y
Multiple Street Rehabilitation
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
lather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
SHADY OAKS FROM FM 1709 TO DURHAM JR. HIGH AND
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement) Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves rehabilitating the existing pavement
with turn lanes and necessary drainage improvements
Location: Shady Oaks from FM 1709 to Durham Jr.
High and Elementary School
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway to improve safety and reduce
maintenance costs.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This roadway is in poor condition and could
become extremely difficult to maintain if this
project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
3. " hnprovmient and
------�
Le villa 1111111
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-23
Shady Oaks Dr. - 1709 to Durham Elementary
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy NO Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
TW KING REHAB FROM BOB JONES TO LAKE GRAPEVINE
Project Description:
This project involves rehabilitating the existing pavement
and providing any necessary drainage improvements
Location: TW King from Bob Jones to Lake Grapevine
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior section) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
iMEN TTURE SCREDUL.E: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This portion of TW King is in very poor
condition and will become virtually impossible
to maintain if this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
N
�►�� �• 1 1 �� I •IDI11 N 11 M-------
--�---�
I I111►1 IJ h(l'l. a O I II Illl 0
-------
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-24
T.W. King Rehab -Bob Jones to Lake Grapevine
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
rather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data. No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
TW KING REHAB FROM SH 114 TO BOB JONES; 12" WATER
LINE ALONG TW KING FROM W. BOB JONES TO P.S. #2
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves constructing a 12" water Line along
T.W. King and rehabilitating the existing pavement (2
lanes) on T. W. King from SH 114 to Bob Jones
Location: T. W. King from SH 114 to Bob Jones Drive
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior section) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs. Companion projects
are to construct 12" water line to increase volume and
pressure in this area of the City.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
This section of TW King is in poor condition and
will become virtually impossible to maintain if
this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
,•I�1•
®®®®
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1� 1
1 1•
f';• •I•
'2. Land Acquisition
'5. Furniture and EqwM=t
------0
6. Offier (Please explain on attached sheet)
' ' '
----®
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-25
T.W. King Rehabilitation / 12" Water Line
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
Lather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
Oven or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
E
S
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
UNION CHURCH/S. PEARSON RECONSTRUCTION; 12" WATER
LINE ALONG UNION CHURCH AND S. PEARSON
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project consists of rehabilitating the existing
pavement and providing the necessary drainage
improvements.
Location: Union Church from FM 1938 to
Pearson/Pearson From Union Church to FM 1709
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior sections) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs. Companion projects
are to construct 12" water line to increase volume and
pressure in this area of the City.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
Y-see above
EXPENDITURE SCTDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
These roads are in poor condition and will be
come virtually impossible to maintain if this
project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
,•IT, .1, M
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1� 1
1 1•
f'0•It
D A W D101 pi I k1i kV UMN so 1DI 16.
-------
Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
-----W"I"i
ME
on-MEI
pi 1 131 1
-------I
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-26
Union Church/S. Pearson Reconstruction
12" Water Line
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to E
gather this information. Even, ef2on
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy NO Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
WEST BOB JONES FROM TW KING TO N. WHITE'S CHAPEL
12 INCH WATER LINE FROM TW KING TO N. WHITE'S CHAPEL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves constructing a 12" water Line along
West Bob Jones and rehabilitating the existing pavement
(2 lanes) on West Bob Jones from T. W. King to North
White's Chapel.
Location: West Bob Jones from T. W. King to North
White's Chapel
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior section) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs. Companion projects
are to construct 12" water line to increase volume and
pressure in this area of the City.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
Y-see above
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This section of Bob Jones is in poor condition
and will become virtually impossible to maintain
if this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
N
,•I�1•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1. 1
1 1•
V,• Is
IN DIN 1111 V ORT1111. 101 Dili I-------
3. Site hnprovmmt and Utility
6. -Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
1 I I 1
-------
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-27
i
I
W. Bob Jones Rehab
12" Water Line (N. White Chapel to T.W. King)
C
Qv
t P
O
P�
r
BOB J N
SILVER SPUR DR�
P
U.
2
Z O
KING RANCH RD
DISCLARVIER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
zather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
WEST HIGHLAND FROM SH 114 TO WHITE CHAPEL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves rehabilitating the existing pavement
and providing the necessary drainage improvements.
Location: West Highland from SH 114 to North White
Chapel
Project Justification:
To rehabilitate roadway (interior sections) to improve
safety and reduce maintenance costs.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This portion of West Highland is in poor
condition and will become virtually impossible
to maintain if this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
1' DI I I I ko t4 OWN so I DI Bali-------
2. Land Acquisition
13. " Improvm=t and Utility16.
------�
------�
Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
-----®
1 1
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-28
W. Highland Rehabilitation
O
p,S of G
lE
11Tr1
DISCLARVIER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
lather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
MILN�R
ff
DITION
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
FM 1709 AT NOLEN DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjectlNeed? Y
Project Dates: FY 01102 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. NeedlService? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description: AlternativeslImpact if not completed:
This project involves constructing a traffic signal at the Traffic safety could be compromised if this
intersection of FM 1709 and Nolen Drive. signal is not installed.
Location: FM 1709 at Nolen Drive
Project Justification:
To provide for the safe and efficient flow of traffic at this
intersection. It is anticipated that this intersection will
meet the warrants for installation of a traffic signal once
the extension of Nolen Drive is completed later in 2001.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCIFIEDUI E: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The signal will be maintained by the Texas
Department of Transportation. Therefore, there
will be no impact to the operating budget.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
"I i'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
�'�• It
SPDC Funds
------0
0. Char Tax Funds
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-29
FM 1709 at Nolen Dr. Traffic Signal
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to E
Lather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data. No Scale
PROJECT REDDEST FORM-C'.ARTTUN RFCn1vcrrurir,r1r1n1r
Project Contact. Mike Hutchison
Department. Public Works
Project Dates: FY 02103
New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
Reconstruct approximately 1800 linear feet of roadway
from Carroll Avenue to Rainbow Street.
Location
Carlisle from Carroll Avenue to Rainbow Street
Project Justification:
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
The street will remain a 22 foot wide asphalt
section if this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
N
B/ I' 11►1 I] 1111 N
5. and hqmpment
MEN
WWI
�
Il 10111M 10191 IUI M D1--
-------
------�
FY 2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-30
Carlisle Reconstruction
L
W
RAINBOW D
00
010
`nf 1
Vv
�-9
O NC
TF C
v
VINO R SO
C
DIAR
ROLL AVE
RD
OARY
DISCLAIN ER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
father this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM- OAK LANE PAVING & DRAINAGE
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves constructing approximately 2500
linear feet of paving improvements and limited drainage
improvements in the Oak Lane Subdivision.
Location: Oak Lane (off of Randol Mill)
Project Justification:
The installation of water and sewer lines have caused a
need for rehabilitation.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The continued deterioration of the pavement will
be the result of not completeing this project. The
installation of water and sewer lines have caused
a need for rehabilitation.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
I MA W 31►11J I IM N 9fZ9;101 Dili 0
------
lot-• •
---5--�
• •
0
--�---
11Y11►1171►(!!.` am DI 11110
-------
1V
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-31
Oak Lane Paving and Drainage
OiL
REGAL OAKS DR
I j�A
J
J
J
O
Z
00-0
O
DISCLAAIER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
lather this information. Every effort
a -as made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
DOVE ROAD -- SH 114 TO KIRKWOOD
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102 Replacement/ Y I Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
Construct approximately 1100 feet of Dove Road from
State Highway 114 to Kirkwood Boulevard to provide the
ultimate street section (5 lanes undivided or 4 lane
divided).
Location Dove Road from SH 114 to Kirkwood
Boulevard
Project Justification:
To widen the roadway in order to provide additional
capacity for entry and exit into Kirkwood Hollow and the
Verizon complex.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This portion of Dove may experience congestion
in the future if this project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the pavement will be new, this project will
have no additional impact on the operating
budget for the next 5 years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
N
••I�1•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
�I�• •I�
13. Site hnprovetnent and Utility------�
5. 1 " . • Equiptnent------�
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 4-32
Dove Road - SH 114 to Kirkwood
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
CASEY COURT (OAKS ADDITION) SEWER
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjectlNeed? N
Project Dates: FY 01/02 — 02/03 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. NeedlService? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This project involves providing sanitary sewer service to The citizens along Casey Court will continue to
the Oaks Addition. have problems with septic systems if this project
is not completed.
Location: Oaks Addition (Casey Court)
Project Justification:
To provide sewer facilities to neighborhoods experiencing
problems with septic systems, and to improve
groundwater quality within the city.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
This project will be combined with all neighborhood
sewer projects for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The annual impact on the operating budget is
approximately $8000 per mile of new sewer line.
The exact length of line for this project is not yet
known.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will generate revenue through sewer
connection fees and usage fees.
. M M
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital improvements Program 5-1
Casey Court (Oaks Addition) Sewer
CARRok-L
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
nas made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
N-2 SEWER INTERCEPTOR CONSTRUCTION
Project Contact: Pedram Farahnak New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates:FY 01/02 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
These funds are planned for the construction of the N-2 No alternatives are available. The N-4 drainage
sewer interceptor, serving the N-2 drainage basin and basin will not be able to develop if this project is
serving the DPS north facility not completed.
Location: From approximately the intersection of Dove
Rd. and Ridgecrest Dr. to Quail Creek Estates.
Project Justification:
This interceptor is essential to the development of the
DPS North Facility.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain n
EXPEND1711W SCH®ULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The annual impact on the operating budget will
be $8000.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will generate revenue through sewer
connection fees and usage fees.
••i1i•
•� �
•Ill
r►1
•� 1:
r�
19/1 � 11►1 IJ 1 111 N 91.��1: 111 I11111 �------_
11 / • [:III :II . 1 Il�lillh�------�
�11►1171►[li.��1:111111111
--_----
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 5-2
N-2 Sewer Interceptor
oN�GP�E
DISCL kDA4ER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
—4t—
and unofficial sources were used to w7r- E
gather this information. Every effort
A as made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
QUAIL CREEK ESTATES, WOODLAND HEIGHTS SEWER
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates:FY 01102 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves providing sanitary sewer service to
the Quail Creek Estates and Woodland Heights Addition.
Location: Quail Creek Estates and Woodland Heights
Addition
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The citizens in the these subdivisions will
continue to have problems with septic systems if
this project is not completed.
Annual impact of the Operating Budget
Project Justification: (Provide $ impact and explanation):
To provide sewer facilities to neighborhoods experiencing The annual impact on the operating budget is
problems with septic systems, and to improve approximately $8000 per mile of new sewer line.
groundwater quality within the city. The exact length of line for this project is not yet
known.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project will be combined with other neighborhood
sewer projects for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDTIURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will generate revenue through sewer
connection fees and usage fees.
•• �•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1/
e':� It
I 1
--
1 1
---
1 1
'
1 "1' •• •' -
--
--®®
� 1 1•
•/
1 1
---
I I
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 5-3
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
SOUTH KIMBALL S-7 SEWER LINE
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates:FY 01102 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Nee&Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves extending the S-7 sewer line along
S. Kimball from Continental to 1800 feet North of
Crooked.
Location: South Kimball from Continental to 1800 ft.
north of Crooked Ln.
Project Justification:
This line is needed to provide sewer service to adjacent
properties, including residences and developing
commercial property.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
Yes. This project will be combined with S. Kimball from
Crooked Lane to Continental.
EXPENDMW SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
If this project is not completed, adjacent
properties will not receive sewer service, and
development of the commercial properties along
the corridor could be hindered.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The annual impact on the operating budget will
be $5300.00
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will generate revenue through sewer
connection and usage fees.
' I D/ � � 11►1111 111 N 9f.��1:111 I11111 �----_--
ri'migiiiII1711 IT!,
P�lll:7 11 •1 •• [�f�Tfa�lillltt�------�
• • 1 •' -
------�
I �11►1 I1 htll.��l:l � I111 �
---_---
II I .
------�
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital improvements Program 5-4
S. Kimball S-7 Sewer Line
CLEBURNE EUBANKS Y
INTERMEDIATE SCHOO
GEORGE DAWSON
MIDDLE SCHOOL
iN
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Soutblake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
Bather this information. Every effort
.vas made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
CISD
ATHLETIC
FACILITY
0
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
GARDEN ADDITION, HEATHERWOOD ESTATES, HERSHAW
ESTATES, LOMA VISTA (WEST SIDE), ROYAL OAKS ESTATES,
TWIN CREEK ESTATES SEWER
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: FY 01102 Replacement) N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves providing sanitary sewer service to
the portion of the Garden Addition, Heather -wood Estates,
Hershaw Estates, Loma Vista (West Side), Royal Oaks
Estates, Twin Creek Estates Additions. The project is
currently under design in FY 00/01.
Location: Garden Addition, Heatherwood Estates,
Hershaw Estates, Loma Vista (West Side), Royal Oaks
Estates, Twin Creek Estates Additions
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The citizens in these subdivisions will continue
to have problems with septic systems if this
project is not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
Project Justification: (Provide $ impact and explanation):
To provide sewer facilities to neighborhoods experiencing The annual impact on the operating budget is
problems with septic systems, and to improve approximately $8000 per mile of new sewer line.
groundwater quality within the city. The exact length of line for this project is not yet
known.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project will be combined with other neighborhood
sewer projects for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will generate revenue through sewer
connection fees and usage fees.
,•I07,•
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1� 1
1 1.
f',• •It
/' I 1 I I
-------
3. Site Irrproven=t and Utility
11 1 I III 1
-------
Iwo rMN1141
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 5-5
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
12" WATER LINE ALONG EAST DOVE FROM NORTH CARROLL
TO NORTH KIMBALL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates:FY 02103 — 03104 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves replacing 6700 linear feet of
existing 8" water line along this portion of East Dove in
accordance with the Water System Concept Plan.
Location: East Dove from North Carroll to North
Kimball
Project Justification:
Increased pressure is needed to provide adequate service
and fire protection to this area of the water system. In
addition, the existing water line is in poor condition and
in need of repair.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project may be combined with other water projects
for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives4mpact if not completed.
The water system will not be able to meet the
projected demand if this project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the water line will be new, this project will
have no impact on the operating budget for the
next five years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
This project will not generate revenue in addition
to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
61
61
2. Land Acquisition
20
20
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction
408
408
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
489
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
81
408
489
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
489
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-1
12" Water Line - E. Dove
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
eas made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
12" WATER LINE ALONG EAST HIGHLAND FROM NORTH
CARROLL TO NORTH KIMBALL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented ProjealNeed? Y
Project Dates: FY 02103 — FY 03104 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. NeeaUService? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves replacing 5300 linear feet of
existing 6" water line along this portion of East Highland
in accordance with the water System Concept Plan.
Location: East Highland from North Carroll to North
Kimball
Project Justification:
Increased pressure is needed to provide adequate service
and fire protection to this area of the water system. In
addition, the existing water line is in poor condition and
in need of repair.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project may be combined with other water projects
for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives4mpact if not completed.
A lack of water pressure and fire protection
could exist as demand increases if this project is
not completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the water line will be new, this project will
have no impact on the operating budget for the
next five years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will not generate revenue in addition
to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
48
48
2. Land Acquisition
16
16
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Constriction
323
323
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
387
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
64
323
387
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
387
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-2
12" Water Line - E. Highland
DISCL kUvIER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
Bather this information. Every effort S
vas made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
12" WATER LINE ALONG NORTH CARROLL FROM DOVE TO
HIGHLAND
Project Contact. Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 02103 — 03104 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves replacing 5300 linear feet of
existing 6" water line along this portion of North Carroll
in accordance with the Water System Concept Plan.
Location: North Carroll from Dove to Highland
Project Justification:
Increased pressure is needed to provide adequate service
and fire protection to this area of the water system. In
addition, the existing water line is in poor condition and
in need of repair.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project may be combined with other water projects
for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The water system will not be able to meet the
projected demand if this project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of tl:e Operating Budget
(Provide S impact and explanation):
Since the water line will be new, this project will
have no impact on the operating budget for the
next five years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will not generate revenue in addition
to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planniniz and Desi
48
48
2. Land Agguisition
16
16
3. Site Im rovement and Utility
0
4. Construction
323
323
5. Furniture and Lquipment
0
6. Other Please ex lain on attached sheet
0
TOTAL--
387
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
64
323
387
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
387
FY 2001102 - FY 2005/06 capita[ improvements rrugruni v--)
12" Water Line - N. Carroll Ave.
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
¢ather this information. Every effort S
vas made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
12" WATER LINE ALONG NORTH PEYTONVILLE FROM FM 1709
TO RAVEN BEND
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates:FY 01102, 04105 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves replacing 6000 linear feet of
existing 6" and 8"water lines along this portion of North
Carroll for the High Pressures Plane in accordance with
the Water System Concept Plan. Design funds currently
exist for this project.
Location: North Peytonville from FM 1709 to Raven
Bend.
Project Justification:
Increased pressure is needed to provide adequate service
and fire protection to this area of the water system. In
addition, the existing water line is in poor condition and
in need of repair.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project may be combined with other water projects
for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
A lack of water pressure and fire protection
could exist as water demand increases if this
project is not completed.
Annual impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the water line will be new, this project will
have no impact on the operating budget for the
next five years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will not generate revenue in addition
to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
45
45
2. Land Acquisition
30
30
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction
420
420
5. Fumiture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
495
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
45
450
495
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crum Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--495
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-4
12" Water Line - N. Peytonville
SOUT
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
Bather this information. Every effort S
.vas made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
12" WATER LINE ALONG RANDOL MILL FROM FLORENCE TO
FM 1709
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 01102 — 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves replacing 4100 linear feet of
existing 6" water line along this portion of Randol Mill in
accordance with the Water System Concept Plan.
Location: Randol Mill from Florence to FM 1709
Project Justification:
Increased pressure is needed to provide adequate service
and fire protection to this area of the water system. In
addition, the existing water line is in poor condition and
in need of repair.
Companion Project? YIN
If_ves, please explain
This project may be combined with other water projects
for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The water system will not be able to meet
projected demands if this project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the water line will be new, this project will
have no impact on the operating budget for the
next five years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will not generate revenue in addition
to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
42
42
2. Land Acquisition
12
12
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Constriction
245
245
5. Funuture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
299
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
54
245
1
299
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
299
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-5
12" Water Line - Randol Mill
DISCLAIMER
N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
eather this information. Every effort
xas made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
12" WATER LINE ALONG SOUTH CARROLL FROM FM 1709 TO
EAST CONTINENTAL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 02103 — 03104 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. NeedlService? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves replacing 5300 linear feet of
existing 8"water lines along this portion of South Carroll
in accordance with the Water System Concept Plan.
Location: South Carroll from FM 1709 to East
Continental
Project Justification:
Increased pressure is needed to provide adequate service
and fire protection to this area of the water system. In
addition, the existing water line is in poor condition and
in need of repair.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project may be combined with other water projects
for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
AlternativeslImpact if not completed.
The water system will not be able to meet the
projected demand if this project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the water line will be new, this project will
have no impact on the operating budget for the
next five years.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will not generate revenue in addition
to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
48
48
2. Land Acquisition
16
16
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction
323
323
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
387
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
64
323
387
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Fluids
0
6. Crime Tax Fluids
0
TOTAL--
387
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-6
12" Water Line - S. Carroll Ave.
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
Bather this information. Every effort
,vas made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
12" WATER LINE AND SEWER LINE ALONG SHADY OAKS
FROM HIGHLAND TO DOVE
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 01102 — 02103 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves replacing 5300 linear feet of
existing 6" water line along this portion of Shady Oaks
for the low pressure plane in accordance with the Water
System Concept Plan.
Location: Shady Oaks Drive from Highland to Dove
Project Justification:
Increased pressure is needed to provide adequate service
and fire protection to this area of the water system. In
addition, the existing water line is in poor condition and
in need of repair.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
This project may be combined with other water projects
for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The water system will not be able to meet the
projected demand if this project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Since the water line will be new, this project will
have no impact on the operating budget for the
next five years.
Will this project generate revenue? Y/N
This project will not generate revenue in addition
to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
83
83
2. Land Acquisition
28
28
3. Site hirprovement and Utility
0
4. Construction
553
553
5. Fumiture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
664
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
111
553
664
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fluid
0
5. SPDC Ftulds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
"A
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-7
12" Water Line and Sewer Line -Shady Oaks Dr.
DISCLUVIER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
oather this information. Every effort
vas made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
20" TRANS. WATER LINE ALONG SH 114 FROM TOWN CENTER
TO NORTH WHITE CHAPEL
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 01102 — 02/03 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This project involves extending the existing 20"water line The water system will not be able to meet the
(9000 ft.) running through Town Square along SH 114 to projected demand if this project is not
connect with the existing 20" water line at White Chapel completed.
in accordance with the Water System Concept Plan. This
project is currently under design in FY 00/001.
Location: SH 114 from Town Center to North White
Chapel
Project Justification:
To improve the distribution capacity from Pump Station
#2 to the Myron Drive water tower.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
This project may be combined with other water projects
for design and construction purposes.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The annual impact to the operating budget will
be $17,000.00
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project will not generate revenue in addition
to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
74
1
74
2. Land Acquisition
100
100
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Constriction
760
760
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
934
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. hnpact Fees
74
100
760
934
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Fluids
0
TOTAL--
934
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-8
20" Transmission Water Line - SH 114
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
� as made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM-
FLORENCE 1.5 MG ELEVATED WATER TANK
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Mandated Project?
Department: Public Works Continuation? Documented Project/Need?
Project Dates:FY 04105 Replacemend Other Cmty. Need/Service?
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
This item involves constructing a 1.5 million gallon water
tower to replace the existing 0.5 million gallon tank on
Florence Drive.
Location: Florence Drive
Project Justification:
The capacity of the existing tank is inadequate.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
N
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The water system will not be able to meet the
projected demands if this project is not
completed.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
This project will not have a substantial increased
operating budget impact over the existing impact
due to the Florence tank currently in service.
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This project willl not generate revenue in
addition to existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
450
450
2. Land Acquisition
0
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction
2,550
2,550
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
3,000
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
3,000
3,000
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
3,000
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-9
Florence 1.5 MG Elevated Water Tank
DISCLUAER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to W+
gather this information. Every effort
%as made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
NORTH PEYTONVILLE 8" WATER LINE (LOW PRESSURE
PLANE)
Project Contact: Mike Hutchison New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Public Works Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: FY 02103 Replacement) N Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
This project involves installing 7000 linear feet of an 8-
waterline from FM 1709 to Woodbrook.
Location: North Peytonville from FM 1709 to
Woodbrook.
Project Justification:
To provide a lope around the low pressure plane in
accordance with the Concept Water Plan.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
N
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
This project is needed to allow proper water
pressure for fire protection.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
The annual impact to the operating budget will
be $13,300.00
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
This proejct will not generate additional revenue
above existing water sales.
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
53
53
2. Land Acquisition
15
15
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction
298
298
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL--
365
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. Impact Fees
365
365
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
365
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 6-10
8" Water Line - N. Peytonville
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
oather this information. Every effort
tics made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
Project Contact: Pedram Farahnak
Department: Public Works
Project Dates: ongoing
Capital Improvement Program
PROJECT REQUEST FORM -
REDUNDANT WATER SUPPLY
New Request? N I Mandated Project?
Continuation?
Replacement/
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
Redundant water supply from Fort Worth to Southlake
Location:
Forty-two (42) inch line from Caylor Tank to Pearson
Pump Station (P.S. #1)
Thirty (30) inch line from Pearson to SH 114
Twenty four (24) inch line on SH 114 to T.W. King (P.S.
#2)
Project Justification:
The city currently has only a single thirty-six (36) inch
supply transmission line to the entire city which has
reached its maximum demand capacity.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
N
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
Y I Documented Project/Need? Y
N Other Cmty. Need/Service? N
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
The city will be unable to meet the year 2004
water demand if this project is not complete (no
alternatives available).
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
$50,000
Will this project generate revenue? YIN
PRIOR
FUNDING
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
2,567
425
2,992
2. Land Acquisition
375
150
50
575
3. Site Improvemerit and Utility
0
4. Constriction
619
2,417
2,268
1,249
6,553
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
0
TOTAL=
10,120
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
0
2. In -pact Fees
2,567
1,419
2,567
2,318
1,249
1
10,120
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Finds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL--
10,120
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 0-1 1
ReA„r A o Y,+ AA Tn+or
DISCLAIMER N
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
vas made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy No Scale
of said data.
YKUJhU l
UI✓51 1,UKM-Nortn 1)YJ racil
Project Contact.,
R. Black
Department: Public Safety
Project Dates: FY 04-05
New Request? I Mandated Project?
Continuation? X I Documented Project/Need?
Replacement// I Other Cmty. Need/Service?
Major Rehab?
Project Description: The Central/Administrative Facility
for police, fire, support and building services
Location: Dove and White Chapel (McPherson Property)
Project Justification:
The current standard of coverage for the City of
Southlake allows emergency response times to the North
end of the city to remain between 7 %z to 9 minutes 80% of
the time. The completion of this building will reduce
emergency response times to below five minutes 80% of
the time. The Crime Control and Prevention District
approved the purchase of this site and the building
concept in 1998. The land is already purchased.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
No
Alternatives/Impact if not completed: The
impact would include a poor standard of
coverage with extended response times. This
means poor Annual Impact of the service
delivery to the citizens and threatens our
accreditation status
Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
$186,000.00. This accounts for normal
operation costs of the building each year, i.e.,
electricity, gas, water, supplies, etc.
Will this project generate revenue?
Yes. The city owns 32 acres. 12 acres will be
built upon for the North DPS facility. The
remaining 20 will be sold.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE:
PRIOR
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
FUNDING
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
$1,045,958
$1,045,958
2. Land Acquisition 1
$0
3. Site Impro\,ement and Utility
$1,526,250
$1,526,250
4. Construction 1
$9,441,289
$9,441,289
5. Furniture and Equipment
$660,230
$660,230
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
$691,500
$691,500
TOTAL=
$13,365,227
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
$0
2. Impact Fees
$0
3. T1F
$0
4. Utility Fund
$0
5. SPDC Funds
$0
6. Crime Tax Fundsi
$13,365,227
$13,365,227
TOTAL=
$13, 365, 227
Y 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 7-1
North DPS Facility
v
DISCLUNIER
This data has been complied for The E
City of Southiake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information, Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
,his data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
FKUJht-,1 K QUES'1' FORM -Fire Pumper North
Project Contact: R. Black New Request? X Mandated Project?
Department: Public Safety Continuation? Documented Project/Need? X
Project Dates: Replacement/ Other Cmty. Need/Service?
October, 2004 Alf-:.- D-,__L
Project Description: Fire Pumper (engine) which will
serve as the first out unit serving the North section of the
city.
Location: In the North DPS Facility
Project Justification:
This unit will serve as the first due engine on all fires and
major medical calls in the North section of the City of
Southlake as well as automatic aid to boarding cities.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
Yes. The North DPS Facility
Alternatives/Impact if not completed. The
impact will result in a DPSfacility that is not
able to respond to fire emergencies due to a lack
of equipment.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
$3, 300.00
Annual preventative maintenance costs.
Will this project generate revenue?
No.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE:(AII values in the thousands of dollars )
PRIOR
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
FUNDING
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
0
2. Land Acquisition 1
0
3. Site Impro\,ement and Utility
0
4. Construction I
1
0
5. Furniture and Equipment
1
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
450
450
TOTAL=
450
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
450
450
2. Impact Fees
0
3. TIF 1
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL= 1
450
FY20OV02 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 7-2
Fire Pumper in the North DPS Facility
oo.
Pj N
NOp1110
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
PROJECT
UEST FORM -Fire Pumper East
Project Contact: R. Black
Department: Public Safety
Project Dates:
October, 2005
New Request? Mandated Project?
Continuation? Documented Project/Need?
Replacement/ X Other Cmty. Need/Service?
Project Description: Fire Pumper (engine) which will
serve as the first out unit serving the East section of the
city.
Location:In the East DPS Facility
Project Justification:
This unit will replace a 1987 fire pumper as planned for
in the vehicle replacement program. This unit will serve
as the first due engine on all fires and major medical calls
in the City of Southlake as well as automatic aid to
boarding cities.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
No
Alternatives/Impact if not completed. The
impact will result in additional maintenance
costs, downtime and reliability on units outside
of the east section of the city.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
$3, 300.00
Annual preventative maintenance costs.
Will this project generate revenue?
No.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
PRIOR
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
FUNDING
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
$0
2. Land Acquisition
$0
3. Site Impro\,ement and Utility
$0
4. Construction 1
$0
5. Furniture and Equipment
$0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
$450
$450
TOTAL=
$450
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
$450
$450
2. Impact Fees
$0
3. TI F 1
$p
4. Utility Fund
$0
5. SPDC Funds
$0
6. Crime Tax Funds
$0
TOTAL=
$450
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 7-3
X
Fire Pumper in the East DPS Facility
N
DISCLARaR
'Ibis data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official "r
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information Every effort
was made to mane the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
YRUJI U l KEQU1 51 PUKM-Ambulance West Pacility
Project Contact: R. Black New Request? Mandated Project?
Department: Public Safety Continuation? Documented Project/Need?
Project Dates:
Replacement/ X I Other Cmty. Need/Service?
Project Description: An ambulance (MICU) which will
replace a 1995 model chassis that is scheduled for
reserve status in the 04105 fiscal year.
Location:In the West DPS Facility
Project Justification:
This unit will serve as the first due amublance on all
medical and injury calls in the West section of the City of
Southlake as well as automatic aid to boarding cities.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
No
Alternatives/Impact if not completed: The
impact will result in an increase in maintenance
and the patient being transported expieriences a
rougher transport than preferred due to aged
wear on the chassis.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide S impact and explanation):
$3, 000. 00
Annual preventative maintenance costs. Annual
medical equipment costs.
Will this project generate revenue?
No.
EVENDITURE SCHEDULE (All values in thousands):
PRIOR
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
FUNDING
TOTAL
EVENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
0
2. Land Acquisition 1
0
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction 1
0
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
160
160
TOTAL=
160
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
160
160
2. Impact Fees
0
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL=
160
FY2001/02 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 7-4
M
Ambulance in the West DPS Facility
M I ,
N
DLSCURYIER
This data has been compiled for The E
CityofSouthlake. Variousofficial
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this adbrimation. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of s
this data however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT
Project Contact: R. Black
Department: Public Safety
Project Dates:
UEST FORM -Ambulance -North Facility
New Request? X Mandated Project?
Continuation? Documented ProjectlNeed?
Replacement/ Other Cmty. Need/Service?
Project Description: An ambulance (MICU) which will
serve as the first out unit serving the North section of the
city.
Location: In the North DPS Facility
Project Justification:
This unit will serve as the first due ambulance on all
medical and injury calls in the North section of the City of
Southlake as well as automatic aid to boarding cities.
Companion Project? Y/N
If yes, please explain
Yes. The North DPS Facility
Alternatives/Impact if not completed. -The
impact will result in an increase in
maintenance and the patient being
transported experiences a rougher transport
than preferred due to aged wear on the
chassis.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
$3,000.00 Annual preventative maintenance
costs. Annual medical equipment costs.
Will this project generate revenue?
No.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (All values in thousands):
PRIOR
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
FUNDING
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
0
2. Land Acquisition 1
0
3. Site Improvement and Utility
0
4. Construction 1
0
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
160
160
TOTAL=
160
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
160
160
2. Impact Fees
0
3. TIF I
1
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL=
160
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 7-5
Ambulance in the North DPS Facility
110N
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Variousofficial E
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this infoanation. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is S
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
FKUJhu I K! QUEST FORM -Ladder Truck
Project Contact: R. Black New Request? X Mandated Project?
Department. Public Safety Continuation? Documented Project/Need? X
Project Dates: Replacement/ Other Cmty. Need/Service?
October, 2004 Maior Rehab?
Project Description: (Ladder Truck) which will serve as
the first out unit serving the entire city of Southlake.
Location: In the North DPS Facility
Project Justification:
This unit will serve as the first due engine on all structure
and commercial fires in the City of Southlake as well as
automatic aid to boarding cities.
Companion Project? YIN
If yes, please explain
Yes. The North DPS Facility
Alternatives/Impact if not completed: The
impact will result in a DPS facility that is not
able to perform specific functions on the fire
ground scene due to a lack of equipment.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
$3, 300.00
Annual preventative maintenance costs.
Will this project generate revenue?
No.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (all values in thousands):
PRIOR
FY01/02
FY02/03
FY03/04
FY04/05
FY05/06
GRAND
FUNDING
TOTAL
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1. Planning and Design
0
2. Land Acquisition 1
0
3. Site Impro\ement and Utility
0
4. Construction
0
5. Furniture and Equipment
0
6. Other (Please explain on attached sheet)
450
450
TOTAL=
450
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
450
450
2. Impact Fees
0
3. TIF
0
4. Utility Fund
0
5. SPDC Funds
0
6. Crime Tax Funds
0
TOTAL=
450
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 7-6
North DP Facility
LL
wo
oo.
m -cE
�A �z
A O�
T
C
LL
LL 0
O 0
DI
�::
DISCLAJI�MR
This data has been compiled for The
CitvofSouthlake. Variousofficial
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was =ho,,:,,ns,:rren=cY of tee
this . is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Bob Jones Development
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request?
Department: Community Services Continuation?
Project Dates: 1012001— 712002 Replacement/
Ma'or Rehab?
N Mandated Project? N
Y Documented Project/Need? Y
N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Continuing improvements in Phase II of Bob Jones Park - Important elements of Bob Jones Park
development, includes irrigation system expansion, development would not be completed as
additional trails, loop road expansion. originally presented to the public.
aeration for the ponds, road improvements, etc.
Location:
- Bob Jones Park.
Project Justification:
- Several items intended to be included in Bob Jones
Phase II development were omitted due to budget
overruns. These items were moved out to future year
construction.
Companion Project? YIN — No.
If ves, Please explain:
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to current park operations.
Will this project generate revenue?
No.
•
---____
Z.si so
lea
•
----_
',
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-1
Bob Jones Development
�T
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this infomtation. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
US data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Timarron-Richards Pond Enhancement
Project Contact: Kevin Hugtnan x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Connnunity Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 7/2002—1212002 Replacentent/ N Other Cntty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Dredging, clearing, berming, landscaping, fountain with - Fill in the pond, Recreation Center
aeration, electrical, etc., for the historic pond on the site construction would not comply with
of the future Recreation Center to make it a viable conceptual plan approved.
amenity.
Location:
- On city property at Byron Nelson and FM 1709.
Project Justification:
- To enhance the natural aspect of the Recreation Center
site and to use it in a drainage capacity, the existing pond
must be modified.
Companion Project? YIN - Yes
If yes, please explain:
- Recreation Center construction
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to site maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
DPI �• �� r. • . 11•. • •• .
-___
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-2
Timarron - Richards Pond Enhancement
m
0
0
Q
0
EAST SOUTHLAKE BI
A DD
-FT U
NBP
o CKE
ORT RO
p
ME
a �E
....
YTON
DT
r
ER OD o
C ?
NORTHWOOD TRL �� A �
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this infonnatiorL Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data. No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM - Recreation Center
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712002—1212003 Replacement/ N Other Cntty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Construction of new Recreation Center, including - Critical recreational needs not adequately met
indoor gymnasiums, fitness center, activity rooms, indoor through city programming
track, dance%xercise room, etc.
Location:
- On city property at Byron Nelson and FM 1709.
Project Justification:
- The city currently has no recreation center to meet the
needs for fitness, dance activities, multi -use sport courts,
etc. The need for a recreation center is identified in the
Park Master Plan.
Companion Project? YIN - Yes
If yes, please explain:
- Water, sewer, drainage, and roadway improvements in
the area will need to be addressed. Roadwork needed to
eliminate Sr. Center access from Parkwood
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- To be determined through Enterprise Plan
being prepared by consultant.
Will this project generate revenue?
- Yes. The facility is expected to recapture
anywhere from 50 to 100 percent of operating
costs, depending on the fee policy adopted.
----
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'� �
----------
1. Flanning and Design
RIM
'!5. Fumiture and Equipment
'
':FUNDING SCHEDULE
------_
' •
---
'11
11
--_
'11
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-3
Recreation Center
EAST SOUTHLAKE BI
OCKEN
DT
N
DISCLAMIER
This data has been compiled for The
E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
S
this data however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Girls' Softball Complex
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712001 — 1212002 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Renovation of Texas School of Baseball property to - Park Master Plan not implemented as adopted.
construct girls softball complex, to include four game
fields, restroom/concession, fencing, lighting, bleachers,
etc.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
Location: (Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Crooked Lane _
Project Justification:
- The city currently has two softball fields dedicated for
girls'softball use. A third field is shared with the adult
softball program. A fourplex of game fields has been
planned (Park Master Plan).
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Will this project generate revenue?
- Yes. The facility is will generate concession
money which will provide support to the softball
league; not significant revenue to the city.
----"
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1•
1. 1•
'� �
i5. Fumiture and Equipment
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-4
Girls' Softball Complex
N
DISCLAWER
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Nature Center Improvements
Project Contact: Kevin Hugntan x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented ProjectlNeed? Y
Project Dates: 712002 — 712003 Replacement/ N Other Cinty. Need/Service? Y
Va'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Reconstruction of Nature Center at Bob Jones Park,
including septic, landscaping, and renovation.
Location:
- Bob Jones Park
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies a Nature Center on
Corps property in Bob Jones Park..
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Staffing of Nature Center (FT) = $35, 000,
maintenance = $4000, utilities = $2500
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
����
" •'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'� � ''
3. Site In-provernent and Utility
15. Furniture and Equip nt
FUNDING SCHEDULE
FY2001/02 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-5
Nature Center Improvements
N
DLSCLAMR
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
wasmc
hhoenaney iosf Swnre
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Royal and Annie Smith Park Improvements
Project Contact: Kevin Hugntan x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Docutnented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712002 — 712003 Replacement/ N Otlter Cntty. Need/Service? Y
Maior Rehah?
Project Description:
- Construction of park -related amenities such as trails,
tennis courts, practice fields, gardens, etc., for currently
undeveloped 13.2-acre Royal and Annie Smith Park.
Location:
- Johnson Road.
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies several park
improvements such as trails, tennis courts, practice fields,
gardens, etc., in this park.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- 1 FTE maintenance = $27,000, utilities =
$20,000
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
����'
•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'� �
��NNNNLOJ
UAI
MIN • • - - •
����
'. 11
��
'11
- . • Equipment
•
11
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-6
Royal and Annie Smith Park Improvements
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The E City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information Every effort
%'as made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Sand Volleyball Courts
Project Contact: Kevin Hagman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 1212001— 512002 Replacement/ Y Other Cntty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction of two new lighted sand volleyball courts
Location:
- Bicentennial Park.
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies two new sand volleyball
courts in the central area of the park to provide a more
diverse user experience in the park. They replace old sand
volleyball court previously located behind the expanded
Tom Thumb.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide S impact and explanation):
- Incidental to current park maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
����
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1
'. �
WWW
FY20OV02 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-7
Sand Volleyball Courts
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this infortnation. Every effort
wasmo nurr,ehc
this hovnneey iosf S
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Natatorium
Project Contact: Kevin Hugtnan x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712005—1212005 Replacement/ N Other Cn:ty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
- Commitment offunding to CISD for natatorium
construction
Location:
- CISD High School on Peyton ville and FM 1709
Project Justification:
- The City committed funding in installment payments to
CISD when the natatorium was being planned
Companion Project? YIN— No.
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Commitment and agreement breached with
CISD
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- N/A
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
����'
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•M
'US1.
Planning and Desig
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-8
Natatorium
= J
WEST SOUTHLAKE BLVD._
CARROLL
A
�o HIGH
SCHOOL
r W W
� D
� 1C CT
B C
N
DISCLARVIEER
)A
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of thiS
s data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Matching Funds
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented ProjectlNeed? Y
Project Dates: 712005—1212005 Replacement/ A' Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Project Description:
- Annual funding set aside as matching funds for groups
who propose projects and are able to match the city's
funding share with their own funds
Location:
- Varies
Project Justification:
- Matching funds are a good way of "doubling" the city's
money on many worthwhile projects proposed by varying
groups in Southlake, such as the youth sports leagues
Companion Project? YIN —No.
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- No opportunityfor private funding to be
leveraged to a greater degree
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide S impact and explanation):
- N/A
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE: (all values in the thousands of dollars)
ism,
EXPENDFURE SCHEDULE
----_--
� •
---
'. 11
'11
'. 11
'11
'• 11
FY2001/02 - FY2005/06 Capital Improvements Program 8-9
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Joint Use
Project Contact: Kevin Hugtnan x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 7/2005—1212005 Replacement/ N Other Cin(y. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Funding earmarked for reimbursement to other entities
(i.e. CISD) for joint participation and use of the other
entity's facilities
Location:
- Varies
Project Justification:
- Joint use funds, through joint use agreements, allow the
city use offacilities without the substantial investment in
capital expenses that separate construction would incur.
Companion Project? YIN —No.
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Opportunities for non-cityfacility use lost
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide 5 impact and explanation):
- N/A
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
----------
----
•�
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
' �� �
No Me
I107=0•MIN
__—_—
WINTMAIG •
---
=1
----------
1. General Fund
---
----�
• CAmeTaxFunds--------1]�
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improveinents Program 8-10
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Special Projects
Project Contact: Kevin Hagman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712005—1212005 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Funding earmarked for unexpected opportunities to fund - Opportunities for unforeseen benefits front
projects each fiscal year that serve special purposes but unidentified projects lost
may not be identified in advance
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
Location: (Provide S impact and explanation):
- Varies - N/A
Project Justification: Will this project generate revenue?
- Special projects funds allow the city to have a small - No
amount offunding available to leverage special or unique
project opportunities as they arise.
Companion Project? YIN —No.
If yes, please explain:
1. Planning and Desiqn
•
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-11
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — New Community Park
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented ProjecdNeed? i'
Project Dates: 712002—1212003 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Construction of new Community Park to house major - Critical recreational needs not adequately met
lighted game and practice fields for baseball, softball, through cityprogramming
soccer, etc..
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
Location: - Depends greatly on size and content. Minimum
- Yet to be determined. 2 FTE maintenance staff = $60,000, equipment
= $20,000, utilities = $20,000
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies a tremendous need for
lighted sports facilities in Southlake. A new Community
Park would be ideal to house a large number of the fields
and minimize the need to decentralize lighted
facilities. The Park Master Plan also identifies the acreage
needed and potential areas for such a facility.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Will this project generate revenue?
- Yes. The facility could generate revenue
through rental to the public, fees from the sports
associations, and other means
- • • o a •
-----_
'111
'111
Milli
----------
- •
------_-
'
TO
FY2001102 - FY2005/06 Capital Improvements Program 8-12
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Parks Maintenance Facility
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712002 — 612003 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Construction of new parks maintenance building on city- - Anticipated parks maintenance staff will not
owned property, to include additional work areas, have the proper work environment to function
storage, equipment yard space, office space, screening, efficiently.
etc.
Location:
- yet to be determined; possibly on city property on south
side of east Continental.
Project Justification:
- The maintenance facility in Bicentennial Park is
seriously undersized for an ever-increasing maintenance
staff and equipment. Plans for such a facility, be it
expansion or a new location, have been in the works for
years.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to park maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
FY2001102 - FY2005/06 Capital Improvements Program 8-13
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Baseball Field Construction/Realignment
Project Contact: Kevin Hugntan x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? �
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712003—1212003 Replacement/ N Other Curty. Need/Service? Y
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction of one new youth baseball field,
realignment of existing softball field and reconfiguration
of two existing softball field for youth baseball play.
Includes additional parking in eastern lot of the park..
Location:
- Bicentennial Park.
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan. identifies a new baseball field
and realigned softball fields adjacent to the existing
community buildings.
Companion Project? YIN- Yes
If yes, please explain:
- Could coincide with removal of existing community
buildings
AlternativesAmpact if not completed:
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to current park maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
----
•
1 1
1 1
1
'` �
2. Land Acquisition
NOMIM
5. Furniture and Equipri-ent
.�
1. General Fund
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-14
Baseball Field Construction/Realignment
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been cony>iled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
E
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
S
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Bicentennial Park Landscape Improvements
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? N
Project Dates: 712003—1212003 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
- Landscaping, turf improvements, irrigation, etc., for
areas between baseball fields, entrance features,
improved open space near Shady Oaks
Location:
- Bicentennial Park
Project Justification:
- Bicentennial Park, as the city's most visible recreational
area, is in need of beautification of the natural elements
in the park. The landscaping, turf and irrigation in the
park need substantial improvement.
Companion Project? YIN - Yes
If yes, please explain:
- Can be combined with Baseball Field
Construction/Realignment and/or Community Buildings
Removal
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
- Status quo maintained; park softscape remains
unimproved
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to current park operations
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
�•
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1.
'� � �'
���_
FUNDINGSCHEDULE
1. General Fund
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-15
tricentennial Park Landscape Improvements
SAN�1N
S PIES
,{ S ='T,
c TP
'ARD CT
17091S
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
OVIS,
P p,FtK
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Community Building Removal
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712002 — 912002 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Removal of existing community buildings in
Bicentennial Park upon completion of the new Recreation
Center.
Location:
- Bicentennial Park.
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan shows the removal of the existing
community buildings in Bicentennial Park when a new
Recreation Center is complete. In their places will be
construction and realignment of baseball fields. The new
Community Center will leave these buildings obsolete, as
they are currently in deteriorating condition and in need
of complete renovation
Companion Project? YIN - Yes
If yes, please explain:
- Possibly Baseball Field Construction and/or
Bicentennial Landscape Improvements
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to current park operations.
Will this project generate revenue?
- Possibly from the sale of the buildings, if so
desired.
----------
1. Planning and Desiqn
• • ' - • . •EHRVOEWMEN
------
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-16
Community Building Removal
N
DISCLAIIv1ER
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information Every effort
was made to ensure the accutaty of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — In -Line Hockey Rink #2
Project Contact: Kevin Hugnian x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712003 — 512004 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction of second in -line hockey rink to
accommodate growth in local hockey league
Location:
- Bicentennial Park, adjacent to existing rink.
Project Justification:
- The growth of the in -line hockey participation by city
residents has been substantial. The Park Master Plan
currently shows a planned second rink. Southlake
currently relies on a second facility in Keller to
accommodate needs of the combined leagues. A second
in -line rink would alleviate that dependence on the Keller
facility.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- In -line hockey needs of Southlake residents
dependent on Keller facility.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide S impact and explanation):
- Incremental additions to maintenance, utilities,
etc.
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
����'
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1� 1
1 1.
'' �
1. • . • Design
FUNDING SCHEDULE
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-17
In -Line Hockey Rink #2
sNtpull -�es I c
pu-�A_NYO 0
sMISS LN-1 R
iENK Y U I L
GREEN OAKS N
'ARD CT SAN
T—F
pPFtK
S"
1709/SHADY
F.M. 1709 W ST soki-T
O'C
OK
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City ofSoutldake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Koalaty Park Development
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712004 — 512005 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description: Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Development enhancements to current baseball practice - Park Master Plan not implemented as
fields, etc., located in Koalaty Park, to include trails, field approved.
enhancement, park signs, tables benches, irrigation, etc.
Location:
- West Continental Blvd., in Koalaty Park.
Project Justification:
- Neighborhood Park development is priority of the Park
Master Plan. The minor improvements noted would
complete this park construction.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to park maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
----------
1. Ranning . • . - •
-------
',
5. Fumiture and Equipment
FUNDING SCHEDULE-
-------
���������
•
Eli
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-18
Koalaty Park Development
Pie
ES
f"` -- --.1 - -"
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is S
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Lacrosse Facility: Lighting of CIS Field
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712002 — 912002 Replacement/ N Other Cfnty. Need/Service? Y
Maior Rehab?
Project Description:
- Lighting the existing Joint Use field at Carroll
Intermediate School to provide a practice and game
facility for the growing lacrosse participation in
Southlake (over 100 participants).
Location:
- Carroll Intermediate School, North Carroll Avenue
Project Justification:
- The growing Lacrosse Association has asked the Park
Board, for assistance in lighting this field. Lacrosse fields
are identified as a need in the Park Master Plan.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to existing maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
�
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'�
����
��
��
1. Ranning and Design
3. Site Improvement and Udity
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Progratn 5-19
Lacrosse Facility -Lighting of CIS Field
C�
NNERs
o ARK
14 & CPRRO"
i tLtIVItN I AKY
SCHOOL
INTER
SCHOi
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The E
City of Southlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this infomration. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Trail Plan Implementation
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Departntent: Contntunity Services Continuation? N Documented ProjectlNeed? Y
Project Dates: Ongoing Replacement/ N Other Cntty. NeedlService? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description: Alternativesllmpact if not completed:
- Trail system implementation in key, high -use areas to - Trail Master Plan not implemented as
compliment existing trails, make critical connections, or approved.
construction as part of other capital projects. On -going
funding allocated every year.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide 5 impact and explanation):
Location: - Incidental to existing maintenance
- Varies by selected projects)
Will this project generate revenue?
Project Justification: - No
- Trail Plan implementation is consistently ranked by the
Park Board and Southlake citizens as one of the highest
priorities. The recenth° adopted Trail Master Plan
suggests key near -term trails and implementation plans.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
----
" •'
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1. 1
1 1•
'• �
----------
1. Planning and Design
13. Site IrnproverTient and Utility
5. Furniture and Equjiprnent
---------
•
1
FUNDING SCHEDULE
----_--
----------
1. General Fund
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-20
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Sheltonwood Park Improvements
Project Contact: Kevin Hugntan x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712005—1212005 Replacement/ N Other Cntty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction ofparking, signage, trails, picnic areas,
etc., in Sheltonwood Park.
Location:
- On city property on east Dove Road near Ridgecrest.
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies minor improvements
related to low -impact public access in Sheltonwood Park,
such as parking, trail improvements, picnic areas, etc.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved
Annual Impact oj'the Operating Budget
(Provide S impact and explanation):
- 0.5 FTE maintenance = $27,000, utilities =
$20, 000
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
����
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'� �
Planning1. • Design
3. Site IrTiprover-nent and Utility
15. - . • Eg ipn-ent
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-21
Sheltonwood Park Improvements
N
DISCLARv ER
This data has been compiled for The
E
W*
City of SoutMake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this infomtation. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
s
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Equestrian Facility Development (Tucker Property)
Project Contact: Kevin Hugtnan x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented ProjectlNeed? Y
Project Dates: 712005 — 712006 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction of park amenities such as trails, parking,
pens, corrals and an arena related to equestrian use of
the Tucker property. ADDITIONAL PLANNING
REQUIRED TO DEFINE SCOPE OF PROJECT.
Location:
- South side of East Bob Jones Road
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies equestrian -related
improvements to the Tucker property.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- DEFINITIVE COSTS DEPEND ON SCOPE
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
----------
1. Planning and Design
15. - . • Equipment
FUNDING SCHEDULE
-------
----------
'6. Cdme Tax Funds
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-22
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Noble Oaks Park Development
Project Contact: Kevin Hugtnan x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712005 — 712006 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction of minor- improvements (trails, picnic
shelters, parking, irrigation, etc.) to Noble Oaks Park
Location:
- The northwest corner of Continental Blvd. and South
Carroll Ave.
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan. notes minor improvements to
Noble Oaks Park.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide 5 impact and explanation):
- Incidental to city's current park maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
����'
•'
1 1
1 1
� 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'� �
Planninq . • Desiqn
Furniture5. . • Equiprnent
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Prografn 8-23
Noble Oaks Park Development
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
CityofSouthlake. Variousofficial
E
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this information. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Skate Park
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 7/2005—1212005 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Installation of equipment designed exclusively for the
use of skateboards and rollerblades. Includes a concrete
foundation with ramps, jumps, rails, etc.
Location:
- Yet to be determined; possible to combine with existing
park improvement or as new stand alone facility in New
Community Park.
Project Justification:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Diverse recreational opportunity not funded.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- 0.5 FTE maintenance = $15, 000, utilities =
$30,000
- The Park Master Plan identifies diverse forms of Will this project generate revenue?
recreation as funding opportunities. A skatebording - Yes; possibly. It is not uncommon for these
facility would provide this user population a designated facilities to charge a nominal user fee.
place to go and cut down on unauthorized use in existing
parks.
Companion Project? Y/N— Yes; possible.
If yes, please explain:
- Possible inclusion in New Community Park (Lighted
Facility) programming.
����
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1.
'• �
5. Fumiture and Equipment
FUNDING SCHEDULE
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-24
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — BMX Facility
Project Contact: Kevin Hugntan x1527
New Request? Y
Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services
Continuation? N
Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712005 — 1212005
Replacement/ N
Other Cntty. Need/Service? Y
Project Description:
- Construction of BMX (motocross) bicycle racing and
stunt track closed circuit course.
Location:
- Yet to be determined. Could be placed within existing
park or installed on new, separate location
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies certain diverse forms of
recreation as opportunities for funding. These types of
facilities are on that list.
Companion Project? YIN — Possible with other park
construction.
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
- Diverse form of recreation identified in Park
Master Plan not implemented
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide S impact and explanation):
- 0.5 FTE maintenance = $15,000
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
����
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'' �
FUNDING SCHEDULE
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-25
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Lonesome Dove Park Playground Replacement
Project Contact: Kevin Hugtnan x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? A,
Department: Conhmunity Services Continuation? Y Documented ProjectAeed? Y
Project Dates: 712003-1212003 Replacement/ Y Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Major Rehab?
Project Description:
-Replacement of existing, aging playground equipment in
city -owned Lonesome Dove Park
Location:
- Lonesome Dove Park, Lonesome Dove Subdivision
Project Justification:
- Lonesome Dove Park has aging and undersized
playground equipment supplied by the developer.
Playground equipment in this park should be upgraded
and expanded to complete the park construction.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Status quo maintained with aging playground
equipment.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Incidental to park maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
����
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1.
'` zjml
- . • Equiprnent
FUNDING SCHEDULE
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-26
Lonesome Dove Park Playground Replacement
w
LOII
N
W
0
HAT CREEK
f N
U OG L LA
RL
U � }
Q
TAYL R ST
S
CJ
EMERA UCIT
N
DISCLAIMER
This data has been compiled for The
City of Southlake. Various official E
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this infomlation. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Working Farm
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 7/2005-712006 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- A working farm is a hands-on, working demonstration of
historical, local, or trade -related
agricultural/horticultural/craft related activities. SCOPE
OF PROJECT YET TO BE DEFINED.
Location:
- Dependent on site selection process. Potential for
undeveloped Tucker and/or Farhat properties near Bob
Jones Park.
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies diverse, atypical
recreational opportunities in addition to the traditional
sports -related ones. This item is identified as one of those
opportunities.
Companion Project? YIN — Possible, as part of other
park -related site development.
Alternatives/Impact if not completed.
- An element of opportunity identified in the Park
Master Plan not implemented.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Anticipated staff, equipment, and utility costs
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
----------
----
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1� 1
1 1•
'• �I
----------
1. Ranning and Design
- . • Equipment------
'1
FUND-ING SCHEDULE
-------
----------
I all
•
_------
', 1
1
FY2001102 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-27
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Family Leisure Aquatics Center
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? Y Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? N Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712005-412006 Replacement/ N Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction of aquatics facilities, such a zero -depth -
entry pools, ornamental spray fixtures, pools, slides, bath
house, concession/rental building, trained lifeguards, etc.,
designed for toddlers and young children under adult
supervision.
Location:
- Yet to be determined. Could be constructed in existing
park or on new park grounds.
Project Justification:
- These facilities are gaining widespread popularity.
Citizen input has suggested the need for such a facility.
The Park Master Plan currently identifies this item as a
funding opportunity.
Companion Project? YIN— Possible to combine with
other park construction.
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Non-traditional recreational opportunity not
funded.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- Large annual maintenance costs (usually offset
by user fees), including utilities = $80,000, staff
= $120,000, equipment = $80,000, chemicals =
$70, 000
Will this project generate revenue?
- Yes. User fees for these facilities are common.
100 % recapture is also not uncommon. Also,
public/private ventures possible.
We Me
1. Flanning and Design
5. - . • Equipnient
FUNDING SCHEDULE
-------
1. General Fund
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-28
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — Farhat Property Improvements
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: 712005 — 512006 Replacement/ N Other Cntty. Need/Service? Y
Ma 'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction of road entrance, parking spaces, pavilion,
fishing pier, and other minor improvements to the city -
owned Farhat Property.
Location:
- Far end of East Bob Jones Road.
Project Justification:
- The Park Master Plan identifies minor road, parking
and other improvements to the city -owned property
known as the Farhat Property.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Park Master Plan not implemented as
approved.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- 0.5 FTE maintenance = $15,000
Will this project generate revenue?
- No
����
" •'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'' �
1. • . • Desiqn
5. Fumiture and Equipment
FUNDING SCHEDULE
OWNURRITA
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-29
Farhat Property Improvements
N
DISCLAWER
This data has been compiled for The
E
CityofSouthlake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this infomration. Every effort
was made to ensure the accuracy of
S
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
of said data.
No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — In -Line Hockey Rink Cover
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527 New Request? N Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services Continuation? Y Documented ProjectlNeed? Y
Project Dates: 712005 — 212006 Replacementl N Other Cntty. NeedlService? Y
Ma'or Rehab?
Project Description:
- Construction of an all-weather cover for the existing in -
line hockey rink.
Location:
- Bicentennial Park
Project Justification:
- With the ability to play games and practice in inclement
weather, the participants in the in -line hockey leagues
would gain much more use out of the existing facility.
Additionally, other city events could be held during
inclement weather that would normally be postponed or -
canceled. This item appears as a funding opportunity in
the Park Master Plan.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Funding opportunity identified in the Park
Master Plan not implemented.
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide S impact and explanation):
- Incidental to park maintenance
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
����
� •'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
'' �
1. Ranninq and Design
5. Furniture and Equipment
FUNDING SCHEDULE
1. General Fund
5. • Funds16,
�������
• 11
'.11
Di me Tax Fun4s
FY 2001102 - FY 2005106 Capital Improvements Program 8-30
In -Line Hockey Rink Cover
I
H DESQ RWE&T_
pjes
NO 0 MISS QbU,R
il=NKYUl SO) L
GR A <S LN
'ARD CT
SAN
1709/SHA Y ell
"It IT
F.M. 1709
IY
Ir
DISCLAIMER
Ms data has been compiled for The
City of SouUake. Various official
and unofficial sources were used to
gather this this information. Every effort
made to ensure the accuracy of
this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy
o of
f said data. No Scale
PROJECT REQUEST FORM — City Portal Implementation
Project Contact: Kevin Hugman x1527
New Request? N
Mandated Project? N
Department: Community Services
Continuation? Y
Documented Project/Need? Y
Project Dates: Ongoing
Replacement/ N
Other Cmty. Need/Service? Y
Project Description:
- Construction of city portals, or entryfeatures, on city -
owned property at entrances to the city.
Location:
- Varies. City entrance points identified in 1995 Corridor
Study.
Project Justification:
- Since the adoption of the Corridor Study in 1995, the
city has identified entry areas on city property to be
improved to promote a sense of place upon arriving in
Southlake. There have been numerous public meetings to
discuss varying concepts.
Companion Project? YIN - No
If yes, please explain:
Alternatives/Impact if not completed:
- Urban design elements from 1995 Corridor
Study not implemented
Annual Impact of the Operating Budget
(Provide $ impact and explanation):
- 0.5 FTE maintenance = $15,000, utilities =
$30,000
Will this project generate revenue?
- No.
----'
•'
1 1
1 1
1 1�
1� 1
1 1•
"�
1. ' . • . • Design,1.
------
'1
1
FUNDING SCHEDULE
----------
General Fund
'
Ui
FY2001/02 - FY2005106 Capital Improvements vrogram v--)1