Loading...
Item 6A - Presentation• Item 6A ZA21-0039 Site Plan Mustang Business Park FA ZA21-0039 Future Land Use Land Use Designation: 1800 SH Zia Industrial and i 100-Year Floodplain Future Land Use Update LU—TYPE 100-Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Propeit - Public ParklOpen Space Public/Semi-Public Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential g+� Office Commercial Retail Commercial Mixed Use - Town Center Regional Retail Industrial II345 690 lam Feet .: IT G ]Ft y s� Zoning 1800 S H 26 1-1: Industrial District 0 AG 0 C1 ® RE 0 C2 0 SF1A C3 j 0 SF1B C4 ® SF2 NR-PUD ;;12 0 SF30 HG 0 SF20A 0 B1 0 SF20B 0 B2 - R-PLIa 0 11 0 MF1 0 12 OMF2 OSP1 �MH OSP2 CS 0 OT 0 01 ® TZO 0 02 0 ECZ -, --DT.M1 YG=q 11 1 PU❑ i . L F' I k- • ,�11! Erb �- 1 ONO .• � � � k . f . "�:. 0 I IJ ,- fn - s P. - 14 7.1 � S • f � ;r� �� �, � _ is � F ,1 �HHE 'LLLLLLLILLLLLLLLU Aerial View .!'.pis• ��� , f. .'"�•• I" C-agonoStadium t R Iva wMustang,Panther Stadium3 �+ rr'Rse �� ���•� � i 4 sl -.-Timberline Ele gy;ary Schvn �41*,,- " r evine.HIII gh.Sch I JPS�H~e`althCenter.: ^4 � ►abevinelColleyville ~� > Wilower Butterfly'Habi 2a 2400 Mustang Cl 9 Southlakojexas 7 ♦ Google (& . street Yew Street View �S � � ! � � �i _ - �c -- t----gym -- -- o ` Height 39'3„ �i Height 39' g Height 35' Height 35' I L e II� ,{ I II g I , �I x r 1 - -- --- > `` r �I v. ' m t Q -iC--a Driveway relocated to meet Height 39'9" -` - stacking depth - min. 150' �` �'.. Height 35' required and 190' shown Wig. dl Building heights reduced to 35' to comply with "I-1" District April 8, 2021 May 20, 2021 a� 1 ZA21-0039 ZA21-0007 60' private street easement for future access GENERALSITE DATA LOT AREA (SQUARE FEET AND ACRES) 1,143,014 SF/ 26.24 A C EXISTI NG ZON ING I1(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) PROPOSED ZONI N G 11( LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) EX LAND USE VACANT LAND USE DESIGNATION INDUSTRIAL AND 10I}YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PROP LAND USE 5PECULATIVE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE BUILDING HEIGHT (#STORIES) 35'-00" / 1 STORY MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FT BUILDING AREA 340,1805F BUILDING AREA BY USE: OFFICE (7%) 23,813SF WAREHOUSE (93°%) 316,367 SF BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 29.90% IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 70.94% iMPERVIOUS AREA 810,8545F PERCENTAGE OPENSPACE 29.06% AREA OPENSPACE 332,160$F PARKING TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED' 396SPACES TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD 388 SPACES HANDICAP 10 SPACES (9 RFQUI RFD) TOTAL 398SPACES 1SPACE PER 1,000SFOF WAREHOUSE * 1 SPACE PER 300 SF OF OFF I CIF REQUIRED LOADING SPACES BUILDING 1:9; BUILOiNG2: 6; BUI WING 3:6 PROVIDED LOADING SPACES(10'X60') BUILDING 1:38, BUI LDI NG 2: 19; BUI LDI NG 3: 24 AREA OF OUTSI DE STORAGE OSF PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE 0% ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION START DATE: Jan-22 CONSTRUCTION END DATE: Jun-23 Possible 30' emergency access easement Emergency only access driveway a - a 1 o� t �;V�fflmj'+� .. ��srr rrr[rrRr-W <... 60' private street easement for future access MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING _ 1 BUILDING - 1: 35'-D" BUILDING -2: 35'-0" BUILDING -3: 35'-0" NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION Umu-mu ❑I■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ R ❑J ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ WEST ELEVATION --i SOUTH ELEVATION PAINT COLOR SCHEME: PAINT COLOR SCHEME_ ❑WINTER WHITE ❑ FOGGY GREY ❑ MORTAR GREY ❑ P4 ACCENT ARCHITECTURAL GRAY ElP-5 (ACCENT) KOLIBRI BLUE MATERIALS ❑ ALUMINUMI STOREFRONT GLAZING CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL W! TEXTURED FINISH ❑ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING / NICHIHAACM ■ SPRUCE WOOD PANEL MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING - 1: 35'-0" BUILDING - 2: 35'-0" BUILDING - 3: 35'-0" --mill a RlQME nm PAINT COLOR SCHEME. ElPT WINTER WHITE ❑ FOGGY GREY ■ P-3 MORTAR GREY ■ PA ACCENT ARCHITECTURAL GR, ■ P-5 (ACCENT) KOLIBRI BLUE WEST ELEVATION m EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEE® ®®® EAST ELEVATION MATERIALS' ALUMINUM/ STOREFRONT GLAZING CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL WITEXTURED FINISH ❑ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING NICHIHAACM ❑ SPRUCE WOOD PANEL SOUTH ELEVATION MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING - 1: 35'-0" BUILDING - 2: 35'-0" BUILDING - 3: 35'-0" BUILDING - 3 NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION PAINT COLOR SCHEME. ❑ WINTER WHITE ❑ FOGGY GREY ■ P-3 MORTAR GREY ■ PA ACCENT ARCHITECTURAL GR, ■ P-5 (ACCENT) KOLIBRI BLUE MATERIALS' ALUMINUM/ STOREFRONT GLAZING CONCRETE TILT -UP PANEL WITEXTURED FINISH ❑ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING NICHIHAACM ❑ SPRUCE WOOD PANEL WEST ELEVATION e� ®®®®®® ®®®®®® ®®®® ® ®®®®® ® SOUTH ELEVATION View at Entrance ..41 It► ._ Section at North Property Line Mustang Development — Modified North Emergency Access Gate Brookfield Emergency Access @ Woodsey Ct. - Upgraded Benefits - Robust - Higher Security — 8' min. - Prevents children & objects from entering site - Aesthetics - match fence - *Pending Fire Marshall Approval - May be temporary with potential West Access ` rAd PWANP Street View A �nm r_,.....i 1235 Timberline Ct P Southlakejexas r ~ i Goo91e �.Street View Goggle Street View RAM -: f t k 4 / S. + Image capture: Qet 2018 & 2021 Goole United States Terms Report a prc€Dlem • • A, sl� • I Tree Canopy Cover Summary Total Site Area 1,142,780 (sf) Total Existing Canopy Coverage (sf) 253,758.5 22.3% of site Required Preservation 38,063.8 15% of Existing Canopy Current Preserved [sf] 70,125.1 27.6% of Existing Canopy Tree Inches Being Removed Total Tree Inches Removed 8,380.1 Total Tree Canopy SF Removed 183,633.4 Total Tree Canopy Percent Removed 72.4% of Existing Canopy •`�i' y• ®� - E: �•. ®•�• •••, °.. Refired canopy to be preserved — 60%* ��''• `•� - _ p Pro osed canopy to be preserved — 27.6% • •.. • c� _ rr sW �'�14 l• -4,*" LEGEND,'�: •, -""��$ �• • BE EREMOVED YGOVERT9 < Variance Requested l"- • • '�` • - ,•*�� �e _ ' ` EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO I� • � ®�*k BE PROTECTED •�07 as * Mm EXISTING TREE TO 9E ®�� 3 • • j w;Y REIN1Ym '• ` �. �, �..4b O • -- i _ Mm EXISTING OECUNING/HAZARO ::.. • •,�.. `£` �- � �, x, �, �,� ' - i :: TREE 1T} RE REMOVED • .� aln �, —.:=-� ., -. '`', EXISNNGTREE TO RE PROTECTEn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 TREE PROTECTION FENCING, I _ REF. DETAIL A, THIS SHEET I--- -- -_-- - --- - -- i Variance Request IM'11,11 The City Council may authorize a variance to any provision of this Ordinance following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. A request for a variance to any provision in this Ordinance shall be accompanied by a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan as outlined in Article 6, or other documentation requested by the Administrative Official, and the following factors shall be considered in evaluating the variance request: i. Whether a literal enforcement of the Ordinance will create an undue hardship or an unreasonable practical difficulty on the applicant; ii. Whether the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed; iii. Whether a reasonable accommodation or alternative solution can be made to accomplish the desired activity without the alteration of the tree; iv. Whether the variance will injure or be wholly compatible with the use and future or existing development of adjacent properties; V. Whether the increased development costs caused by preserving the tree create an undue hardship on the development of the site; vi. Whether there is any identified adverse effect of the alteration or preservation on erosion, soil moisture retention, flow of surface water, and drainage systems; vii. Whether there is any substantial impact to the buffering of residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of non-residential uses; Whether costs versus the benefits of relocating required utility service infrastructure and easements based on preservation or alteration of protected trees; Whether the proposed tree replacement procedures adequately mitigate the alteration of the tree Whether the alteration adversely affects the public health, safety or welfare; and Whether the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this Ordinance to the greatest degree reasonably possible. - \�_ \\\1111IIE �IINN/0" IICITY OF SOUTHLAKE' LEGEND - - — BUFFER REQUIRED PLANTINGS SITE REQUIRED PLANTINGS wlTREE MITI GATIDN PLANTINGS � ■ EXISTING TREES-M REMAIN m 5 Mitigation :ro • Cagp •-83 Accent - 333 PRCP05EU BUILDING REF. ARCHITECTURL � a .i .. f .... . I .\ El. r r m M M, m III BUILDING PROPOSED1 REF. ARCHITECTUREED I ` 1 I I 1 PROPOSEDBUILDING REP, ARCHITECTURE PROPOSED BUILOING I °` REF. ARCHITECTLIRE E F O'6'O Trip Generation Averages vs Variability • Average numbers are used from a nationwide data set • Actual counts have variability • Based on Sizes of development • Based on specific Land Use Selected • Based on specific tenant type • Based on success/ market economics 110 General Light Industrial 130 Industrial Park 140 Manufacturing 150 Warehousing 151 Mini Warehousing 154 High Cube Warehousing Transload / Shori 155 High Cube Fulfillment Center SORT 155 High Cube Fulfillment Center NON - SORT 156 High Cube Parcel Hub 157 High Cube Cold Storage 160 Data Center 170 Utility 180 Soecialty Trade Industrial Park 6,000 5,000 4,000 w 3,000 2,000 1,000 00 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 X=1000Sq. Ft. GFA Wa rehousi ng1:51-11:1 w a L F- 500 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 X = 1000 Sq. R. GFA Reset Zoom Restore x Skud;� Site I fitted Curve - - - Average Rate Trip Generation Comparison to an existing Industrial Site on Kimbal s r ` + O Pk A h�j rIt ,yam Existing Kimball Industrial Site • Existing site is not fully leased • AM / PM Peak Count Only • Buildings total approximately 338,000 SF — Similar in total size to Mustang site Kimball Site (May 26, 2021) AM Peak Hour 117 19 136 PM Peak Hour 29 93 122 Mustang Project (Warehousing — from TIA) AM Peak Hour 51 15 66 PM Peak Hour 19 50 69 Turning Radius Concerns • Southbound SH 26 to westbound Mustang Ct is approximately 80' radius. • Right -turn is into a single westbound travel lane. • Over -tracking into opposing lanes is necessary. • Verified in field with observations • Verified with Autoturn simulation software • Right -turn vehicles can queue in SB SH 26 right -turn lane and wait if opposing vehicle obstructs turn • This conflict will increase as truck and traffic load increases Example Turn Radii Movement swings into oncoming lanes on Mustang Movement swings into SB SH 26 Thru lane and oncoming lanes on Mustang Turning Radius Improvements 1. Restripe eastbound approach —11' travel lanes for right and left lane — would allow for an 18 wide entry lane. a. Coordinate with TxDOT and Rail to determine if lane striping is necessary between tracks and SH 26. Creating an unstriped neutral area between tracks and 26 would facilitate larger and faster over -tracking 2. Restripe eastbound approach to a single outbound lane a. Would accommodate all trucks inbound b. Would require additional signal cycle time beyond any previous estimates in TIA 3. Complete reconstruction of approach a. Widen entry lanes/radius to better accommodate inbound right -turns a. Would require all new crossing equipment etc. b. Major construction project requiring coordination with Railroad, TxDOT, and City of Grapevine b. Would need to consider if any improvement alternatives are available on east side as well with the goal to eliminate E/W Mustang split phasing and to allow Eastbound Mustang dual left to be served during track dwell phase. C. TxDOT may be unwilling to consider a major project due to relative age of SH 26 improvements. Recommendations Based on further information gathering and field observations in response to public comments 1. Work with TxDOT and City of Grapevine to adjust existing eastbound Mustang Ct signal split time to allow for better accommodation of existing traffic. 2. Based on trip generation of similar site on Kimball, warehousing use for trip generation may be low if uses are not restricted to warehouse. If uses can not be restricted, TIA may need adjusted to reflect maximum uses allowable under zoning. 3. Make site plan conditional on obtaining approvals from TxDOT, Trinity Metro and City of Grapevine for restriping the eastbound approach to better facilitate inbound truck movements. 4. Develop new coordinated signal timing plans approved by TxDOT and City of Grapevine that accommodate the development traffic. The signal timing will likely require multiple rounds of fine tuning/timing and detection adjustment as site builds out. City Council Action CITY OF SOUTHL,A Questions?