Loading...
Item 6A - 2035 Corridor Committee Meeting ReportCITY OF SOUTHLAKE Q J I— O2®35 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting Report Meeting 30 — January 25, 2020 MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas 76092 Council Chambers, Town Hall IN ATTENDANCE: • City Council Members: Chad Patton, Shawn McCaskill, John Huffman • Planning & Zoning Commission Members: Gina Phalen, Michael Forman, Austin Reynolds • Park Board Member: Frances Scharli • City Staff: Ken Baker, Dennis Killough, Madeline Oujesky AGENDA ITEMS: 1. Call to Order. 2. Administrative Comments. 3. Review, discuss and make recommendations on three (3) proposed warehouse/distribution center buildings totaling approximately 330,980 square feet on approximately 26 acres generally located at the northwest corner of Mustang Ct. and Southwestern St. 4. Review, discuss and make recommendations on a proposed approximately 8,400 square foot STEAM building and 25 parking spaces to be added to the existing Clariden School at 100 Clariden Ranch Rd. 5. Review, discuss and make recommendations on a proposed proposed commercial sports facility consisting of a 32,550 square foot indoor building, a 28,245 square foot outdoor facility with restrooms, and 132 parking spaces on approximately 3 acres located at 2311 Crooked Lane. 6. Review, discuss and make recommendations on a proposed assisted living development consisting of 80 beds in five buildings on an approximately 5.5 acre portion of the New Day Church property at 101 E. Highland St., generally located at the southeast corner of E. Highland St. and N. White Chapel Blvd. 7. Review, discuss and make recommendations on the proposed development of a HTeaO tea store located at 190 Davis Blvd. being approximately 1.35 acres approximately 625 feet south of W. Southlake Blvd. on the west side of Davis Blvd., just south of Sonic. 8. Adjournment. MEETING OVERVIEW: On January 25, 2021 the Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee held their thirtieth meeting. The Committee was sent a packet of materials prior to the meeting that were to be discussed during the session. A meeting agenda was posted, and the meeting time was advertised on the City's website. The following meeting report focuses on discussion points made during the meeting by members of the Committee, public and City staff. This report is neither verbatim nor does it represent official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by the Committee, City staff, and any attendees of the meeting. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow development cases through the process. Please visit CityofSouthlake.com/Planning for more information. 50UTHLAKE ITEM #3 DISCUSSION — Review, discuss and make recommendations on proposed amendments to the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, pertaining to residential solar panels. Staff presentation: Ken Baker Purpose of this proposal is to review, discuss, and make recommendations on three (3) proposed warehouse/distribution center buildings totaling approximately 330,980 square feet on approximately 26 acres at 1800 S.H. 26 Zoning: 11 o The City does own some property to the West Future Land Use: Industrial with 100-Year Flood Plain o Industrial and business service development that is relatively free of unwanted side effects, such as unsightliness, noise, odor, glare, vibrations, etc., is permitted in the Industrial category. o If meeting the qualification of relatively free of unwanted side effects, suitable types of development in the Industrial category can be characterized by the manufacturing, processing, packaging, assembly, storage, warehousing and/or distribution of products. o Ancillary commercial and retail activities associated with these uses are permitted. Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi -Public activities as described above may be permitted if surrounding industrial uses do not pose hazards and are sufficiently buffered Proposed plan — Total three (3) buildings = 330,980 s.f. o Building = 73,500 s.f. o Building = 170,000 s.f. o Building = 87,480 s.f. Questions for staff by the Committee: N/A Applicant presentation by: N/A — Applicant used staff presentation / Committee members started asking questions Questions for applicant by the Committee: Frances Scharli: Have you spoken to any of the surrounding neighbors that back up to the property? Applicant: As of now, I do not believe we have. We do have a meeting set-up for neighbors to attend and give feedback. Frances Scharli: How will the impervious coverage placed at this location affect drainage? Since this property is partially located in the 100-year flood plain. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Item #3 — Mustang Business Park Page 3 Ken Baker: As part of their submittal, they will include a preliminary drainage study. If approved, they will have to include a full drainage study. Overall, they cannot increase the impact of runoff pre- and post -construction. Chad Patton: The retention pond on the front, I assume you will also have a detention pond and make it more of an accent? Applicant: Yes, we're planning on having three detention ponds on the south end of the site. Chad Patton: Thinking of the view from Interstate 26, we would like to have this development as attractive as possible. There is a big walking/biking trail along Interstate 26; do you have plans to make that mobility accessible for your staff to use that amenity? Applicant: We have plans to connect the private drive and future sidewalk to the walking/biking trail for access to the sidewalk system. Chad Patton: With three buildings, are you anticipating phasing this development? Or construct all at once? Applicant: We plan to construct all at once. Chad Patton: Regarding parking, if you are looking at 370 required parking spaces why do you want to increase to 446? Applicant: We want to increase the office use percentage to balance the space. Because they are spec buildings, we want to leave flexibility for whatever tenant comes in to utilize the space. Chad Patton: One thing that will come up is how you plan to protect your neighbors to the North as it relates to parking. As well as separating that space using landscaping or fencing. Would you consider adjusting the parking on the north side to the front end? Applicant: Sure, we are working through that. We have plans for a screening wall along the North end; I believe its 30ft of landscaping between parking and the property line. Chad Patton: For a 40ft building I assume you want exterior lighting for safety reasons. Have you incorporated lighting plans to minimize the impact on the surrounding neighbors? Applicant: Yes, it is in progress. We are doing everything we can to ensure there is no bleed -over onto that North side. Chad Patton: Same with sound, obviously this development looks distribution heavy. Make sure noise continuation is limited. Applicant: Sure, we will look at that before submittal Chad Patton: Going back to ingress and egress, something with this magnitude and having a single point entry isn't desirable. Applicant: We will have an emergency access point but based on how this site sits there are the not many opportunities for more entry/access points to the SW street. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Item 43 — Mustang Business Park Page 4 Applicant: Another thing we are doing is extending a full public street section. Chad Patton: Public street? Dennis Killough: Their internal access will be built to a street standard for industrial, which is 30ft pavement for larger traffic footprint. Chad Patton: So, no liability back to the City for maintenance? Dennis Killough: No, it is going to be a private street. STAFF PRESENTATION SHOWN TO COMMITTEE: CITY OF , SOUTHLAK1 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item 43 — Mustang Business Park Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Page 5 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item 43 — Mustang Business Park Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Page 6 __5A y. r i t Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 — Mustang Business Park Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Page 7 City Owned Property f mar ; rlt r�.. -, • _ �'-_r.'—_.. _ _ f �1- .. ...-.— 87.580 s.F. Total - 330,980 s.f. Proposed GEkERALSFFE DATA LOT AREA SgIiA,AE FEET ANO ACRES ],i4I85F/2G 27 AC 63 ZONING i 1 f UGNT IkDIISTRI ALF Eli LAND USE VAUNT PROP LAND USE []ISTR16LETIpk Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item 43 —Mustang Business Park Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Page 8 Brookfield Propunw, _ wVeiAMG LT�-lreeyx, ' r. '1 PROJECT MUSTANG PROJECT MUSTANO w.Tr� Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item 43 — Mustang Business Park Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Page 9 • ! ! ; �:. ! Son law .......,l. �...�l. i ,. __ ntoIaI��sl��a��l����l�! T .rR�■ ■ L.. p.r ■rrur r..lwaw ,. , ,1, RrpeidllM PROJECT MUSTANGProp- �-�r•'Kw IW Rp qM Cover Summary - *216- - TOY ShAM 1.1lZ7m n9 2WA%91 qr +�3 A""Vallm 151mg CIPAR Green Prese�d 1sr! 74N� T1-IS d ErOnf "ff TmI 1Rhei 0llllq TIQlgNQd �.. � idY Tn. KIl. Mnowd !.b!q •.. t �- Tml Tir SF ft. ! W9 Tf 4A d 6g1p - .I � TRY iq! CYropr Ve1Cw1 i � 7W _. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item 43 — Mustang Business Park Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Page 10 ' LP1.01 wig .Y......... ......... i 'yam 1 LPs1.03 ; i± =' LP 1.04 rrwwwwr-wswwwr. -- LP 1-05 F '+. rrrrr rw.w :I �r r.rr Landscape Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item 43 — Mustang Business Park Meeting #30 —January 25, 2020 Page 11