The URL can be used to link to this page

2001-02-20 CC PacketCity of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 8. 2001 TO: Billy Campbell. City Manager FROM: Valerie Bradley, Assistant to the Director, Public Works, ext. 2342 SUBJECT: Award bid to Mobil Air Sweep for quarterly power washings, sidewalk cleaning, and porter service at Town Square Action Requested: Staff requests the City Council award the bid for quarterly power washings. sidewalk cleaning, and porter service at Town Square to Mobil Air Sweep, in the amount of $15,920 Background Information: Financial Considerations: Citizen Input/ Board Review: Legal Review: Alternatives: During the budget process, Council approved several Town Square maintenance items, some of which were quarterly power washings. sidewalk cleaning, and porter service for the City owned portions of Town Square. The contract for FY 99-00 has expired and a new contract needs to be executed. As shown in the performance specifications attached, the contract will include: • hot water power wash public sidewalks quarterly, • pick up ALL trash (including cigarette butts) in landscaping on public property five times per week. and • cleaning (vacuuming, blowing, or sweeping) public sidewalks five times per week. Five bids were received, qualified bid of $15,920. during the budget process. None. None. Approve or Deny. with Mobil Air Sweep submitting the lowest Council approved sufficient funds for this service 5B-1 Billy Campbell February 8, 2001 Pase 2 of 2 Supporting Documents: Bid Tabulation Sheet Performance Specifications for Power Washing, Side Walk Cleaning. & Porter Services at City of Southlake Town Square Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council award the bid to Mobil Air Sweep for quarterly power washings, sidewalk cleaning, and porter service at Town Square at the February 20, 2001 Council meeting. 5B-2 Ti O OaOO O Oa00 0 o0Loo O O C4=0) r-- CC) r-- d? N O T i() r, O O 64 64 60 ',,. 64 G� OO O di O;O O i H ' T' Cw O d_co Lo c7 M V ram+ O i O Q C O C 64' Efi 64 0 O C?+ O O — � O olO O O 0 '61Ci N 'a N co co C* S r- co T L Q rC 64 6q'6) 69 O C) C) O O C) O O O O OO O CO 00 ; T O lq- m1U7 O -, y r to tp CM N t6 LO C L Q°� (09 61-:� �o 000 mo 000 O Q C) C)0 (0(D00 N NN O �C n v m O Efl C bR: 64 EA N N L cn (n C c0 !Z � U C W w O ` to � 0) O �0- Q EC O 1'� •C a� a� E N 0 N 3 E c U t u) 7 U 3 U N a cn C N (u -J ar o CL c U�m' CO) � 5B-3 Performance Specifications/Contract (W for Power Washing, Side Walk Cleaning, & Porter Services at Citv of Southlake Town Square Bid Due Date: February 13, 2001. 10:00 a.m. City Secretary_ 's office at 1400 Main Street. Suite 270. Southlake. Texas. 76092 Bid Opening: February 13, 2001. 10:00 a.m. City Secretarv's office at 1400 Main Street. Suite 270. Southlake, Texas, 76092 Scope of Work: The contractor shall provide the following services at Southlake Town Square* for the term of this contract: hot water power wash public sidewalks quarterly, pick up ALL trash (including cigarette butts) in landscaping on public property **five times per week. and cleaning (vacuuming, blowing, or s,,yeeping) public sidewalks **five times per week. All work shall be completed during non -business hours (12 a.m. to 5 a.m.). with the exception of the porter service. The successful contractor is responsible for disposal of all trash collected. * See attached map (page 7) for exact area to be serviced. ** Services to be provided five times per tiveek frill occur each Friday, Saturday, Sundav, Tuesday, and Thursday (including holidays) for the term of this contract. Insurance: The Contractor will carry Workmen's Compensation Insurance. Public Liabilitv and Property Damage Insurance, and Automobile Insurance sufficient to provide adequate protection against damage claims which may arise from operations under this Contract in compliance with the following: Contractors Insurance: Without limiting any of the other obligations or liabilities of the Contractor, during the term of the contract. the Contractor and each subcontractor, at their own expense, shall purchase and maintain the herein stipulated minimum insurance with companies duly approved to do business in the State of Texas and satisfactory to the Owner. Certificates of each policy shall be delivered to the Owner before any work is started, along with a written statement from the issuing company stating that said policy shall not be canceled, non -renewed or materially changed without 30 days advance written notice being given to the Owner, except'when the police is being canceled for nonpayment of premium, in which case 10 days advance written notice is required. Prior to the effective date of cancellation, Contractor must deliver to the Owner a replacement certificate of insurance or proof of reinstatement. A model Certificate of Insurance is illustrated herein. Coverage shall be of the following types and not less than the specified amounts: (a) workers' compensation as required by Texas law-. with the policy endorsed to provide a waiver of subrogation as to the Owner; employer's liability 5B-4 insurance of not less than S 100.000 for each accident. S 100.000 disease -- each employee. S500.000 disease -policy- limit. (b) commercial general liability insurance. including independent contractor's liability. completed operations and contractual liability covering, but not limited to. the liability assumed under the indemnification provisions of this contract. fully insuring Contractor's (or subcontractor's) liability for injury to or death of Owner's employees and third parties. extended to include personal injury liability coverage with damage to property of third parties. with minimum limits as set forth below: General aggregate S 1.000,000 Products --Components; Operations aggregate S 1.000.000 Personal and advertising Injury 5600,000 Each Occurrence S600,000 Fire Damage (any one tire) S50.000 Medical Expense (any one person) S5,000 The policy shall include coverage extended to apply to completed operations, asbestos hazards (if this project involves work with asbestos) and XCU (explosion. collapse and underground) hazards. The completed operations coverage must be maintained for a minimum of one vear after final completion and acceptance of the work, with evidence of same tiled with owner. (c) comprehensive automobile and truck liability insurance. covering owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, with a combined bodily injury and property damage minimum limit of S600.000 per occurrence: or separate limits of S250.000 for bodily injury (per person). $500,000 bodily injury (per accident) and $100.000 for property damage. Such insurance shall include coverage for loading and unloading hazards. Owner's Protective Liability Insurance: Contractor shall obtain, pay for and maintain at all times during the prosecution of the work under this contract. an Owner's protective liability insurance policy naming the Owner and the Engineer as insured for property damage and bodily injury. which may arise in the prosecution of the work or Contractor's operations under this contract. Coverage shall be on an "occurrence" basis, and the policy shall be issued by the same insurance company that carries the Contractor's liability insurance with a combined bodily injury and property damage minimum limit of S600,000 per occurrence and S 1,000.000 aggregate. "Umbrella" Liabilitv Insurance: The Contractor shall obtain, pay for and maintain umbrella liability insurance during the contract term. insuring Contractor for an amount of not less than S1.000.000 per occurrence combined limit for bodily injury and property damage that follows form and applies in excess of the primary liability coverages required herein above. The policy shall provide "drop down" coverage where underlying primary insurance coverage limits are insufficient or exhausted. Owner and Engineer shall be named as additional insured. Policy Endorsements and Special Conditions: (a) Each insurance policy- to be furnished by Contractor shall include the following conditions b%- endorsement to the policy: (1) name the Owner and the Engineer as an additional insured as to all applicable coverage; M: ( 2 j each policy shall require that 30 days prior to the cancellation. non -renewal or anv material chance in coverage. a notice thereof shall be Riven to Owner by certified mail. If the policy is canceled for nonpayment of premium. only 10 days written notice to Owner is required: (3,) the term Owner" shall include all authorities. boards. bureaus. commissions. divisions. departments and offices of the Owner and individual members. employees and agents thereof in their official capacities. and/or while acting on behalf of the Owner: (4) the policy phrase "other insurance" shall not apply to the Ow-ner where the Owner is an additional insured on the policy; and (5) all provisions of the contract concerning liability. duty and standard of care together with the indemnification provision. shall be underwritten by contractual liability coverage sufficient to include such obligations within applicable policies. (b) Insurance furnished by the Contractor shall be in accordance with the following requirements: (1) any policy submitted shall not be subject to limitations. conditions or restrictions deemed inconsistent with the intent of the insurance requirements to be fulfilled by Contractor. The Owner's decision thereon shall be final: (2) all policies are to be written through companies duly licensed to transact that class of insurance in the State of Texas: and (3) all liability policies required herein shall be written with an "occurrence" basis coverage trigger. (c) Contractor agrees to the following: (1) Contractor hereby waives subrogation riglits for loss or damage to the extent same are covered by insurance. Insurers shall have no right of recovery or subrogation against the Owner. it being the intention that the insurance policies shall protect all parties to the contract and be primary coverage for all losses covered by the policies; (2) companies issuing the insurance policies and Contractor shall have no recourse against the Owner for payment of any premiums or assessments for any deductibles. as all such premiums and deductibles are the sole responsibility and risk of the Contractor: (�) approval, disapproval or failure to act by the Owner regarding any insurance supplied by the Contractor or any subcontractors) shall not relieve the Contractor of full responsibility or liability for damages and accidents as set forth in the contract documents. Neither shall the bankruptcy. insolvency or denial of liability by the RM insurance company exonerate the Contractor from liability: and (4) no special payments shall be made for any insurance that the Contractor and subcontractors are required to carry: all are included in the contract price and the contract unit prices. Anv of such insurance policies required under this section may- be written in combination with any of the others. where legally permitted, but none of the specified limits may- be lowered thereby. The Contractor shall furnish the Owner with satisfactory proof that he has provided adequate insurance coverage in amounts and by approved carriers as required by these contract documents. PROPOSALSCHEDULE The undersigned bidder having thoroughly examined the contract documents. including plans. specifications. the site of the project and understanding the amount of work to be done and the prevailing conditions, hereby proposes to do all the work, furnish all labor. equipment. and material. except as specified to be furnished by the city, which is necessary to fully complete all of the work as provided in the plans and contract documents and subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake, Texas. and binds himself upon acceptance of this Proposal to execute a contract. Contractor proposes to do the work within the time stated and for the following sums: BASE BID: All work required by the specifications, including labor and materials for power washing public sidewalks in Southlake Town Square quarterly, all work not specifically identified as an alternate. TOTAL BASE BID: per quarter for four times = S ALTERNATE NO. ONE: All work required by the specifications. including labor and materials for picking up ALL (including cigarette butts) trash in landscaping on public property located at Town Square five days per week. ALT. NO. ONE TOTAL: S per week for 52 weeks = S 4 5B-7 ALTERNATE NO. TWO: All work required by the specifications, including labor and materials for cleaning (vacuuming, blowing. or sweeping) public sidewalks in Southlake To,.yn Square five days per week. ALT. NO. ONE TOTAL: $ per week for 52 weeks = $ ALTER\ATE NO. THREE: All ,vork required by the specifications, including labor and materials to perform the following for special events: � ` • hot water power wash public sidewalks, • cleaning (vacuuming, blowing, or sweeping) public sidewalks in Southlake Town Square. and • pick up all trash in landscaping on public property. ALT.NO. THREE TOTAL: $ per event for five events = $ BASE BID: $ ALT. \O. ONE TOTAL: S ALT. NO. TWO TOTAL: $ ALT. NO. THREE TOTAL: $ TOTAL BID S Bidder will be chosen based on low bid, which includes base bid plus chosen alternates. The intent is to award this contract to one bidder. Within ten (10) days after acceptance of this Proposal. the undersigned will execute the formal contract. The undersigned assures that its employees and applicants for employment and those of any labor organization, subcontractors, or employment agency in either furnishing or referring employee applicants to the undersigned are not discriminated against. The bidder agrees to begin said service on March 1, 2001 and continue service through February 28. 2002. Receipt is acknowledged of the following addenda: Addendum No. 1 Addendum \o. 2 Addendum No. 5 (SEAL) If bidder Corporation Respectfully submitted IIn Title Address ME 34 32'1 31 177 L30 M Postoffixe, 29 28 27 26 2524 23 38 39 4243 44 - 7% 1 40 41 age 20 45 19 %�Aik"AL ML ALI 18 46 7MM, L .2 17 47 22 . !, 16 NMI : Town Hall 4 494a 15 50 51 w Sol! Ab I ja . i, .�AL.AL-AW7. 53,', 52 54 8 55 7 a Ij ohm 0 Ru W 3► 58 59 qo 61 62 City of Southlake Department of Planning MEMORANDUM February 16, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Bruce Payne, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Extension on the Amortization Deadline to Bring Existing Outside Storage, Display and Screening into Compliance with Ordinance No. 480-HH. REQUESTED ACTION: Consideration of a resolution declaring one -hundred eighty (180) day extension on the amortization deadline for the City's outside storage regulations (Ordinance 480-HH). BACKGROUND: The Planning staff has raised a number of questions and concerns regarding the application and enforcement of the Outside Storage Ordinance. Staff believes that the literal application of this ordinance may exceed the City Council's original intent. The concerns raised by staff cover a number of areas including the following: 1) storage of certain types of materials between the principle building and the right-of-way; 2) types of materials that can be stored outside; 3) the regulation of operations on property without a principle building; and 4) the regulation of existing uses. Attached are examples of how the Outside Storage Regulations if literally applied would effect certain types business operations in Southlake (See Attachment A). The ordinance established February 22, 2001 as the date for businesses to bring existing outside storage, display and screening into compliance. Attached are the results of a preliminary survey conducted by staff to identify current business operations in Southlake that do not adhere to the regulations of the Outside Storage Regulations. This is a non -exhaustive list. Enforcement of the Outside Storage Regulations as currently written will substantially increase this list (Attachment B). FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None sc - LEGAL REVIEW: The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the attached resolution. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action at this time and enforce the existing outside storage regulations according to the adopted amortization schedule. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Attachment A -Examples of how the current Outside Storage Ordinance if applied would effect existing businesses. Attachment B- List of known non -conforming uses in the City Attachment C-Resolution 01-007 BP/Attachments (3) Approved for Submittal to City Council: City Manager's Office N:''.Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\LUPAmdClowl.doc Agenda Item 5C ATTACHMENT A OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION � STAFF CONCERNS -BIG BOX RETAIL Area looking south from S.H. 114 Home Depot's outside storage along S.H. 114 does not meet the following Outside Storage Ordinance requirements:* • Outside Storage shall observe till setback requirements for the principle building (45.1 l .a.2). The existing screening wall along S.H. 114 does not now meet the setback requirement due to a portion of Home Depot's northern property being acquired as R.O.W. for the S.H. 114 widening project. There is no provision in the Outside Storage Ordinance that addresses preexisting uses. • The screening wall Tull meat the articulation requirements set forth in the Zoning Ordinance (45.11.b.2). The screening wall for Home Depot's outside storage does not meet the requirement of the Outside Storage Ordinance in terms of articulation. • No outside storage areas s/m/l bc lo, wc,l forward of the principle building on the tract of lot of land, nor between the principle building and any public street except for those uses listed in 45.11. a. 3. Materials currently stored behind the the Home Depot screening wall such as pallets, paving stone, and fencing material are not allowed to be stored between the building and a public road under the current regulations. Even though these items are not visible from S.H. H 4, the items will need to be removed and stored under roof to meet the intent of the Outside Storage Ordinance Y OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION STAFF CONCERNS -BIG BOX RETAIL No outside storage areas shall be located forward of the principle building on the lot or tract of land, nor between the princil4e building and anl' public street excel)t jt)r those uses listed in 45.1 t. a. 3. The Outside Storage Ordinance does allow lawn equipment, swimming pools, barbecue grills, bag goods, propane items and similar items to be stored between the principle building and the public street if located behind a solid wall (45.1 La.8). However, the outside storage ordinance does not allow dissimilar items to those listed in 45.1 La.8 such as paving stone, bird baths, landscape timbers, chemicals, garden books, etc. to be stored in between the principle building and any adjacent public street. These types of items are typically stored in garden center areas associated with big box retail. All three (3) big box retail stores in Southlake have their garden centers located between the main building and the public right-of-way. Under the current ordinance (even though these items are not visible from the adjacent roadway), only items listed in 45.1 La.3 and items similar to those listed in 45.1 La.8 are allowed to be located in any of the current big box's retail garden centers. Other type of items will need to be stored under roof to meet the intent of the Outside Storage Ordinance. *** ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE, REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT *** OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION STAFF CONCERNS -OUTSIDE DISPLAY OF GOODS THAT DO NOT HAVE A PRINCIPLE BUILDING The Outside Storage Ordinance states that the display of any goocts, materials. merch idise. equipment, parts, junk or vehicles cssed in a business operation shall not be permitted unless granted by a specific use permit and in conformance with the Outside Storage Ordinance provisions (45.11-Introductory Sentence). Under the current language of the Outside Storage Ordinance, the flea market operation located on the corner of White Chapel Boulevard and S.H.114 must be screened through the construction of a nuninnfm eight (8) foot cirticukited wtill of n asonr.v, ►wood, wrought iron, or a combination of these inaterials (45. I I.b.l & 2). *** ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT *** OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION STAFF CONCERNS-LANDCAPING OPERATIONS The Outside Storage Ordinance addresses the display and sale of living plant material in areas between the principle building and the public right-of-way (45.1 La.8). Plant materials require a solid screening wall or a combination of wrought iron fence panels and masonry material (similar to the principle building). The Outside Storage Ordinance as currently written requires all businesses (unless zoned B-1 or B-2) such as M.J. Farm and Nursery (#1 & #2- located on Union Church Road) to provide screening if it chooses to market plants in front of the building (45.1 La.8). Also, the ordinance does not address measures for nursery operations for landscaping businesses such as Green Oaks Nursery (#3- located on F.M. 1709) which do not have a primary building. Since the ordinance is silent on this particular use, it is staff's opinion that the plants associated with this type of retail operation are considered a display of any goods. materials, merchandise. egtiipmew. parts, junk or vehicles used in a business operation and are subject to the outdoor storage and associated screening regulations (45.11-Introductory Sentence). *** ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT *** OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION STAFF CONCERNS-LANDCAPING OPERATIONS The Outside Storage Ordinance states that the display of any goodl . materials. inerchtindise, equipment, parts, junk or vehicles used in a business (perationi shall not be permitted unless granted by a specific use permit and in conformance with the Outside Storage Ordinance provisions (45.1 I -Introductory Sentence). This language requires landscaping businesses such as RBI landscaping located on F.M. 1709 and Pipes Flower Ranch located on S. Pearson Lane to screen their operations through a minimum eight (8) foot wall of masonry, wood or wrought iron or a combination of these materials (45.11.b.1 & 2). *** ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT *** OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION STAFF CONCERNS -CONSTRUCTION SITES The Outside Storage Ordinance states that the display of any goods, inaterials, merchandise, equipment, parts, .junk or vehicles used in a business operation shall not be permitted unless granted by a specific use permit and in conformance with the Outside Storage Ordinance provisions (45.11 Introductory Sentence). Activities associated with construction are not addressed under the current Outside Storage Ordinance. Therefore, the storage of materials, equipment, vehicles, etc. associated with a business activity such as those activities associated with a construction site are subject to the provisions provided and must be screened by a minimum eight ( 8) foot articulated wall of masonry, wood, wrought iron, or a combination of these materials (45.1 Lb. 1 &2 ). *** ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT *** OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION STAFF CONCERNS-MICHAEL DRIVE The properties along Michael Drive are zoned AG and have Residential Adjacency. The Outside Storage Ordinance states that additional screening requirements shall apply to all properties with non residential uses, except those properties zoned I-1 and I-2 which have no residential adjacency (45.1 l.b.l& 2). The Outside Storage Ordinance requires businesses along Michael Drive to construct a minimum eight ( 8) foot articulated wall of masonry, wood, wrought iron, or a combination of these materials. Also, these walls must meet articulation requirements. *** ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT *4'* OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION ,%W STAFF CONCERNS -INDUSTRIAL SITES There are existing industrial uses in Southlake like Pumpco which have the appropriate industrial zoning but are residentially adjacent. The Outside Storage Ordinance as written requires that all properties with non-residential uses, except those properties zoned I-1 & I-2 which have no residential agjacenc y , shall screen materials through the construction of a minimum eight (8) foot articulated wall wood. wrought iron or it conahination of these materials (45.11. b. 1 &2). Also, many existing industrial uses which have appropriate industrial zoning and are not residentially adjacent (similar to Tri-Dal) are storing materials between the primary building and the public roadway which are not allowed (45.11.a.3). '�' ` ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE REQUIRES A SPECIFIC; USE PERM 1T : -; * OUTSIDE STORAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION STAFF CONCERNS -MASONRY SITES No outside storage areas shall be located forward of the principle building on the lot or tract of land, nor bete,-eeii the grincl'ple building and anY public . trecl, r_<< epi fig r those itses lived in 45.11. a. 3 (masonry not included in this list). Therefore, the Outside Storage Ordinance requires that masonry and other materials located on the properties above must be stored under roof to meet the intent of the ordinance since it is located between the principle building and public streets. Also, masonry materials not stored between the building and the public road will need to be screened through the construction of an eight (8) foot articulated wall of masonry, wood, wrought iron, or a combination of these materialsw" n` + «y' r Ns3 2 jil I y? I Z XI a l Z Est ' fl sl IZE > ry.f 4- ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE P'ERMIT'�'�* Eq F•q IN N) ul n V i I Ln A i w i N a OZ TW uN^7. i I Z f +•1 � 11 i� � I Cc L) I 'w N X. N N I N W N I I N I A O O Io cn Im O I= 1 S IT !� p CD CD I O CD y ;D � -� n N D a CD CD CD CD CD S — I T I 1 N 07. N IG� 7 �:r O IG) O C C i0 � �• I to m 9 I � CD Ci O to O G O I r O ET CD LD L- cn cn a)�- -' , n CID I CD =3 U)ET — 3 ci I CD U) v (n O C D � V CD to y � in CD a) O ! y Cl) c� (.) CD `< ;::Z' y CD (D D O (D n+ N rQ ry I. I IC= � " ► I r 1� I V/ l mil 1 I— CIDCD ✓: V U ^I- 2.1 _ 1 cD m I (✓ �� CD ° X ° C 3 O a = I D ICD CO`- — I — cn r- .. O ` V G7 i Tt i A I W N VI i ISCD T ` Iw IC IL71 m CD I U (D D a (, D a CD CD CD v < CD N CL CD Cn G — _i� i > I- I— I— > � _0 N' m O —• CJ O r c CD I cn v: I.. .= — I—T O ,,,, m y cn _- 3 " �=a�'U E ID O_ ` � r I J D Lo y < CD (D n (D CD _� J o �.CD CD y � aj CD n Z 7 T c W I� U I o cn o c c CC n O n O 0 I n c o O s I� ti I ` E. 5 0 a m — ` CD ^ • UJ L--7 r J O L — Q 1 CD F (D O i I� 3 X U_ o' I cn c CD s ',' _ _ � O o I "D to I _ J � I � •J � � � � � � r CD � I � CD I I � I I !Z cz Z — IU cn Il (D I D ^) D w f IZ I� I — CAD — � iJ — _— i 'D i ✓ U i — U N > cc cn I O I I CL CD i i I 0 N I I © � R � I o _ o -ni 111)cnC_^c-) o o o CD �_ - m (D = - ! 0 a) ^" cncr. cn Lz :D (C CD cn cr c - cD CT I , ATTACHMENT B a 0 r-f- y) La CL 7771 (D J Ln If cc CID M C O O N 00 9 CD (n CD v J cr CD cn �w i tD co 1 -I Qi CJt A i W N i Z O IN O -n > _W 0 -I D ° o o�rr D ° a Dr1l. D 0o cn ' —!> CD v� DDIN� CD D D� CD cn �� CDCDi (n = C7� D N cn Q IU W Z W Vi ^c O m A 0 00 co cc co co I ( co G 0 co (D 1 W A N 1� N W N W N T IV A O O O CJt O O C n CT co CD ❑ Z C cl) cn W - CD CD CD CD I ^ a /1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ...1 ❑ 1 v S \�/ rr. J d 1 CD CD CD CD CD Ch CD I CD O N G) � �� (A n 61 —i TI C7 O 2 C7 < O - 2 ^CD CD x 0 m CD 3 3 ` cn 3 cQ rn D cn a co (n a C7 TI y CD to O CD °' (n CD C_ iv �. d T Z o rn OO CD �• g o o �. cn g a N t� o cn c cn _ m .0 o c �' 3 o j c CD m° 1 Oa v -• I i I c •C •�•j cn O W CD a CD Q c Cli 0 cc-D ° � � cn C a � o o o cn CD ° °<'CDv, =a � - v. � m n� 3 i CD� �a� CD (n° cc (D I CL aai ccn n CDC) ca oCL,, o.0 oX °i I 0 c S CA N -B Cv (n fv C n N =r N O I ) f� aw CD 0 CD = I ac m N (O cz CD CD C (n CD � (n CD r CA CD cn CD I (!. ^ = C Nj I CD C. CDr, a . , — (n P — cn CD ° cv CD CD 0 J J C O O O O 3 CD CD CD CD CD CD v cn = CD a a a CL a IO c c c CD • in r. (n r.... Imo' < < to T . C G) � I` CD O O a G I= < < cn I •- O CD CD r ^,) O C:3 U1 A W N i O O r r W O O I1 = r G c 2 G c o c_ G o J U w m W -' .. m a N N -, m D D p G Z i °a p O cn i CD C C CD i I Cr) C'' Cn N OD O O C M I ? CJ7 v L� w CJt A � O O C71 C i W ! C � CD 0 i i CL CD a i N < < < < o °�' n 5D ° m a)< D CD N CL CD i a 0 N - - D D D I � 1 ...a _ �ii � � N = � ?• I i ly cc) c 2)L v' n v °� t o r o D m Cn CD . c v a - w C- <n C p in c p C S? c• c CD in 3 C cn -0 c_ m =a c°n �? (o 0 CD 0 CD cw =� a a CD CDCD CD �. _3 _� CD U) cn o N ° cn o o v v c o v i o c c ° o Lo a- 0 ! o Cv'D n _ � y 3 m = cn = CD �� cn o 3 o n =' I = vc ' c m `< CD o n� v 0- =. -0 CD o CD < 3 0 =. i 1 o< O O c° ° `G `° o C fU c T o CD =r ac^ O C _� x CD .r O T � C O; a) c� 3 cn 3 En C v Imo• I a CD 0 CD cn O CD C O Vi O to C Cn J O 1 CD Ery O C) (D O 27 C C cn O p 4 CD W O cn 3 CD C N CD �• o v o CD c n C(D _� °' c m < I CD CD 2 Z Z Z i75 C) Z Z CL Z CL � Z I �O ao 0 o v, o 7' o I ^ — - CD . fU CD CD CD `' ) CD n• c-, ^ p 3 3 r t\ 3 CD W CD Lr CD 0 CL a v D CD O 3 O 3 I CCD I N' v J• � 'O = G Cp a I � C CD V - N i 7 � 2 ƒ I U 4 k U I w � (. �e le~r ® 0 ƒ E c_ ,_ / / / %_ » C. _/ �%Lrl e e > 02 ��_%/\�� c 2 \ ± CD/ P Cl) \ \ \ / « 0 / 0 0 / q \ 2 / / / T S O 2 g 2 2 / 0 e = / ° e n / CD2 2 7 " % CDS = E 2 \ / r / / c e I = CD / ƒ R • < g o N / f � § /2 � ;ƒ \ G % J / ° § / G \ \ [ 2 x _ ° c 6 5 C a c =_ &° / k \ k % / / / a - - \ CD k E / / _ƒ CD ° \ ® 0 / / / / $ \ \ / 0 ƒ f § E 2/ £ = E/) c C / Lo°\ k E J/ g 2 %/ § / _ ° ƒ \ _ 3 ° ° ® ° E ° ° ° m / \ \ — / ) \ ƒ f -0 2= w / �• e\ s 2 5 -\ n. 3' 3 :- / CD /_ e' CC ° $ CD $ / 2 % _ / / £ � \ ® 2 \ c ƒ\ 6§ E CD _\ s§cn CD ° e m �72 | / O c Z 2 c & R NJcn & « t J ƒ \ (D CD CDCD CDCD ( / g J 3 \ CD \ \ \ \ E / \ o CDs ] CD g g CD CD cn > S i RESOLUTION NO.01-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, DECLARING AN EXTENSION ON THE AMORTIZATION DEADLINE TO BRING ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE, DISPLAY AND SCREENING INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE 480HH, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, on September 19, 1989, the City Council of the City of Southlake adopted the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, which incorporates regulations for specific use permits; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance number 480HH on February 15, 2000, amending the regulations relating to outside storage and requiring that all outside storage comply with the terms of the ordinance before February 22, 2001; and WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Southlake has determined that the outside storage regulations are in need of review and believes that it will take several months to develop sufficient information to determine whether it is appropriate to amend Ordinance No. 480HH regarding regulations for outside storage on non-residential properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to maintain the status quo within the City until such time as the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have had a reasonable opportunity to study, discuss, review and consider amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that it is necessary and appropriate to delay the amortization deadline of February 22, 2001 in which all outside storage, display and screening must comply with Ordinance 480HH; and WHEREAS, a new amortization date will be established to bring existing outside, storage, display and screening into compliance with the outside storage regulations once the City Council has had an opportunity to complete its study and possible revisions of the Outside Storage Regulations. Agenda Item Attachment C 5C Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: SECTION 1. There is hereby declared to be a 180 day extension the amortization deadline to bring all outside storage, display and screening into compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 4801-111. SECTION 2. This extension of the deadline date shall be considered in full force and effect upon its passage and for a period not to exceed 180 days unless terminated prior to that time by action of the City Council. SECTION 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission is directed to expeditiously review amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, conduct public hearings, and initiate proper procedures for consideration of adoption of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regulating outdoor storage, display and screening on non- residential property. SECTION 4. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2001. ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor Agenda Item Attachment C 5C Page 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attomey City of Southlake, Texas Agenda Item 5C Attachment C Page 3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 16, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Rick Black, Interim Director of Public Safety (Ext. 2421 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 01-006, Revising Resolution No. 00-01 in support of the application for related grant funds for a D.A.R.E. officer through the Criminal Justice Division of the Governor's Office. Action Requested: City Council consideration of Resolution No. 01-006. Background Information: This resolution is a revision of Resolution No. 00-01 showing support for the application of related grant funds for a DARE officer through the Criminal Justice Division of the Governor's Office. This Resolution provides for the acceptance of year five funding from CJD for a DARE officer to teach preventative drug education to the youth of Southlake. Financial Considerations: City would receive funds of $7,469 in 2002. This is the maximum allowable amount of 20% of a DARE Officer's salary at the time of the original grant application. Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: Reviewed and approved by City Attorney Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: Resolution 01-006 Staff Recommendation: Place Resolution No. 01-006 on the February 20, 2001 City Council meeting agenda for approval. RB/rf SD-1 City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 01-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, REVISING RESOLUTION 00-01 IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION FOR RELATED GRANT FUNDS FOR A D.A.R.E. OFFICER THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION OF THE GOVERNORS OFFICE. Whereas, the City Council of the City of Southlake concurs with efforts to make America's neighborhoods safe places in which to grow, live, and work, and Whereas, the Criminal Justice Division of the Governor's Office provides funding for programs designed to assist communities in the development of innovative, locally -designed, long-term community policing programs designed to promote community -based problem - solving, prevent crime, and enhance public safety with a focus on the youth, and Whereas, the City of Southlake has adopted Resolution 00-01 in support of this program and to conform to all of the requirements of such grant program upon being awarded such funding, and Whereas, the City of Southlake agrees that in the event of loss or miss -use of the Criminal Justice Division funds, the City of Southlake assures that the funds will be returned to the Criminal Justice Division in full, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, Revises Resolution 00-01 to reflect continued support for the application for related grant funds through the Criminal Justice Division of the Governor's Office, and authorizes the Southlake Department of Public Safety to apply for grant funding for the continuation of existing programs and development of initiatives consistent with those program goals. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF February, 2001 ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: 5D-2 Mayor Rick Stacy City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 8, 2001 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, ext. 2175 Subject: Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with TxDOT for the construction of the Traffic Management Bond Program intersection improvements at South Carroll Avenue and FM 1709 and intersection improvements at Shady Oaks Drive and FM 1709. Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with TxDOT for the constriction of the Traffic Management Bond Program intersection improvements at South Carroll Avenue and FM 1709 and intersection improvements at Shady Oaks Drive and FM 1709. Background Information: The plans and specifications for construction of the intersection improvements at South Carroll Avenue and FM 1709 and intersection improvements at Shady Oaks Drive and FM 1709 have been completed. A portion of this construction of the intersection improvements takes place within the state right-of-way of FM 1709. $2,270,502 was included in the Traffic Management Bond Program for the construction of South Carroll Avenue and FM 1709 and $648,044 was included for Shady Oaks and FM 1709. It is anticipated that the construction of these projects will begin in the Spring 2001. Construction time is 180 days. With the approval of the construction plans, TxDOT requires the City to execute an agreement that includes the following: The City will have prepared approved plans for the work to be performed in accordance with the "TxDOT Standard Specifications for Constriction of Highways, Streets and Bridges". 2. The City will provide all traffic control in accordance with the "Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways". 5E-1 IR Im 0 3. The City shall be responsible for the entire cost of all work to be performed associated with the reconstruction of the intersections of South Carroll Avenue and Shady Oaks Drive. 4. The City's contractor will provide appropriate insurance. 5. The City will provide proper notice to TxDOT prior to work commencing. 6. TxDOT will make frequent inspections of the work being performed. This is standard TxDOT agreement for doing work within the TxDOT right-of-way. Financial Consideration: None. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: The City Attorney has reviewed this Agreement. Alternatives: Without agreement, intersection improvements cannot be constructed. Supporting Documents: Agreement. Staff Recommendation: Please place on City Council Agenda for February 20, 2001 for Council consideration and approval. Staff recommends that the Council authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement with TxDOT. CT/ta 5E-2 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FOR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT SOUTH CARROLL AVENUE .AND SHADY OAKS DRIVE THAT INCLUDE: TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, THE CONSTRUCTION OF DECELERATION LANES (RIGHT TURN LANES), DRAINAGE AND RELATED STRIPING AND SIGNING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF FM 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) THIS AGREEMENT, is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and throuUh the Texas Department of Transportation hereinafter called the "State", and the City of Southlake. Texas an&or its representative actim-bv and through its authorized officials, hereinafter called the "City WVITNESSETH "HEREAS, the State owls and maintains a system of highways for public use and benefit. includin l a seument of FM 1709 which lies within the City of Southlake: and WHEREAS, the City desires to reconstruct the intersections of S. Carroll Avenue and Shady Oaks D-iv e including traffic signal modification, the construction of deceleration ;ar,,:s. Pa�-,e I of 5E-3 drainage and related striping and sit7ning by permit on an existing section of FYI 1701) .within the right-of=wag limits, and WHEREAS, the State ac;<no�wledges the common benetits of the Cit-,.'s pr000sa! AGREEN1ENT NOW THEREFORE, In consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and a,-reements of ;he parties hereto. to be b� them respectively kep: and performed as hereina.ter set forth, it is ._reed as follov,s l . The State grants to the City license and permission to reconstruct the intersections of South Carroll Avenue and Shady Oaks Drive as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto for the above mentioned section of FYI 1709 within the limits of the right of way. It is understood and agreed that the State does not purport, hereby, to grant any right, claim, title or easement in or Upon FYI 170,a .)r the right of .vay upon which it is constructed. The City shall prepare or cat:se to be prepared ippro%ed plar;s for the Work incidental thereto. No construction work shall be performed on the State's right of until these plans ha% been approved by the State, and after such approval has been acknowledged in writing, no chani7es or alterations shall be made therein without the written approval of the State. All construction to be performed shall be in accordance with the latest version of TxDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HIGHW_aYS, STREETS AND BRIDGES. The City shall pro ide such detours, barricades. warning signs, flares, tiashin_J litzht signals a:.d bagmen as are necessary to direct and protect vehicular tragic awhile the construction as hereinabove described to be done on the State's right of wad:. is in progress. Details of these traffic control measures, conforming to the Texas Manuai on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, shall be shown in the plans. If, during construction. it is necessary or desirable to modifv the traffic control measures from those shown on the plans, prior approval must be obtained from the State's District Engineer in Fort Worth, 1 The City shall be responsible for the entire cost of all work to be performed associated wit :he reconstruction of the intersections of South Carroll Avenue and Shad: Oaks Drive which a authorized herein_ \'othing contained herein shall ewer be construed to place upon the State any liability or to or death of persons. or for damage to or loss of property, arising fror-n or in anv manner cc:,nected with the .work authorized herein. (W Pa je -, of 5E-4 any contractor and, or City shall provide for insurance as follows �� orker-'s Compensation Insurance Amount - Statutor<. B Comprehensive General Liability Insurance .mounts - Bodity Injury S500,000 each occurrence Property Damage S 100.000 each occurrence C Comprehensive .-automobile Liability Insurance amounts - Bodily injury S—�O,i)00 each person S�00,000 each occurrence Property Damage S 100,000 each occurrence The State shall be included as an "additional Insured" by Endorsement to policies issued for coverages listed in B and C above. A "Waiver of Subro,ation Endorsement" in favor of the State shall be a part of each policy for coverages listed in A, B and C above any contractor and:'or City shall be responsible for any deductions stated in the policy. The State shall make suitable. frequent, and complete rnspectiorl Ot 311 materlals. and equipment. and construction work within the limits of the State's right of way in order to determine that the construction meets all applicable requirements of the plans and specifications for operation and maintenance by the State after its completion. The City will provide opportunities, facilities and representative samples, as may be required, to enable the State to carry on suitable, frequent, and complete inspection of all materials, and application methods. sufficient to afford determination and certification by the State that the construction within the limits of the State's right of way complies with the requirements of the approved plans and specifications- The State will promptly notify the City of any failure of materials. equipment or construction methods. and the City will take such measures as necessary to obtain acceptable construction procedures without delay. 8 The City shall notify Mr. Mark Schluter, P.E.. North Tarrant County Area Engineer, telephone number (817) 238--5900, Fort Worth, Texas, and Mr. Zach Sessions. Northeast Tarrant County Maintenance Supervisor, telephone number (817) 283-22731. Euless. Texas. T'nev_ should be notified at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to beginning the %, ork on State owned right of way. Mr. James �Vard , Traffic Signal Supervisor, telephone number (817) 31, shall be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to beginning any excavation within the right of wa,. in order that the State may yerifv the existence of any electrical wiring. Failure to pro�:-ide proper notification will result in the immediate repair at the Citv's expense. °aue > of 5E-5 10. �Il titility companies shall be `riven prior notification of the pending construction to ensure that no conflicts exist ��ithin the protect area. .All utilities that exist within the pro -iect area and will be beneath the pa,ement as the result of this �\ork, %t:il be required to be adiuste;i bevond the road,Aav surface. 11 This ailreement may be tenninated by anv of the followim-, conditions. (a) By mutual v,ritten agreement and consent of both parties lb) By the State by notice in writing to the City_ as consequence of failure b . the City to certorm the services set forth in a satisfactorz- manner anc ��Ithin the limits pro,, ided. (C) By either party, upon the failure of the other party to fulfill its obligations as set forth in this agreement. (d) By satisfactory completion of all services and obligations described herein. The tern ination of this a�,reement shall extin�,uish all �Iuhts, duties. obligations :end liabilities of the State and the City under this agreement. If the agreement is terminated, the existinu roadwav shall be returned to its original cross section and condition. I �. This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the within, subject matter. ?acre -t or 5E-6 IN TESTINIO'iY HEREOF. the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in dt:plicate cour,terpa<<s ATTEST: CITY OF SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS yped Name Title Date City Secretary THE STATE OF TEXAS Executed for the Executive Director and approved by the Texas Transportation Commission under the authority of Stand alone Manua: Notice 98-3 for the purpose and effect of activatin_ and carrvinu out the orders. established policies or wort: programs heretofore approved by the Texas Transportation Commission. Steven E. Simmons. P.E. Typed dame District Enuineer Title e 5E-7 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 8, 2001 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, ext. 2175 Subject: Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with TxDOT for the construction of the Traffic Management Bond Program intersection improvements at Brumlow Avenue and SH 26. Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with TxDOT for the construction of the Traffic Management Bond Program intersection improvements at Brumlow Avenue and SH 26. Background Information: The plans and specifications for construction of the intersection improvements at Brumlow Avenue and SH 26 have been completed. A portion of this construction of the intersection improvements takes place within the state right-of-way of SH 26. S1,012,516 was included in the Traffic Management Bond Program for the construction of Brumlow Avenue and SH 26. It is anticipated that the construction will begin in the spring of 2001. Construction time is 180 days. With the approval of the construction plans, TxDOT requires the City to execute an agreement that includes the following: 1. The City will have prepared approved plans for the work to be performed in accordance with the "TxDOT Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets and Bridges". 2. The City will provide all traffic control in accordance with the "Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways". 3. The City shall be responsible for the entire cost of all work to be performed associated with the reconstruction of the intersection of Brumlow Avenue. 5F-1 4. The City's contractor will provide appropriate insurance. 5. The City will provide proper notice to TxDOT prior to work commencing. 6. TxDOT will make frequent inspections of the work being performed. This is standard TxDOT agreement for doing work within the TxDOT right-of-way. Financial Consideration: None. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: The City Attorney has reviewed this Agreement. Alternatives: Without agreement, intersection improvements cannot be constructed. Supporting Documents: Agreement. Staff Recommendation: Please place on City Council Agenda for February 20, 2001 for Council consideration and approval. Staff recommends that the Council authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement with TxDOT. CT/ta 5F-2 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTYOF TARRANT § AGREEMENT BET`VEEN THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CITY OF SOGTHLAKE FOR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT BRUMLOW AVENUE THAT INCLUDE: TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS. PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS. DRAINAGE, AND RELATED STRIPING AND SIGNING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY Mg SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) THIS AGREEMENT, is made by and 'between the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation hereinafter called the "State", and the City of Southlake. Texas and/or its representative acting by and through its authorized officials, hereinafter called the "City". `VITNESSETH WHEREAS, the State owns and maintains a system of highAays for public use a-, ,': benefit, including a segment of SH 26 which lies within the City of South lake, an d WHEREAS, the City desires to reconstruct the intersection of Brumlow Avenue including traffic signal modifications pavment improvements drainage and related striping an; signing by perniit on an existing section of SH 26 within the right-of-,,vay limits; and as ,e 5F-3 WHEREAS, the State acknowledges the common benefits of the City's proposal. AGREEME T NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: L The State `,rants to the City license and permission to reconstruct the intersection of Brumlow Avenue as shown in Exhibit attached hereto for the above mentioned section of SH 26 within the limits of the right of way. It is understood and agreed that the State does not purport, hereby, to grant any right, claim, title or easement in or upon SH 26 or the right of way upon which it is constructed. 2. The City shall prepare or cause to be prepared approved plans for the wort incidental thereto. No constriction work shall be performed on the State's right of "vav Until these plans have been approved by the State,. and after such approval has been acknowledged in writing, no changes or alterations shall be made therein without the written approval of the Stag All construction to be performed shall be in accordance with the latest version of TxDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION'S FOR CONSTRliCTION OF HIGHWAYS, STREETS AN-D BRIDGES. 3. The City shall provide such detours, barricades, warning signs, flares, flashing light signals and flan>men as are necessary to direct and protect vehicular traffic while the construction work, as hereinabove described to be done on the State's right of way, is in progress. Details of these traffic control measures, conforming- to the Texas Manual on Unifor-1 Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, shall be shown in the plans. If. during construction, it is necessary or desirable to modify the traffic control measures from those shonvn on the plans, prior approval must be obtained from the State's District Engineer in Fort Worth 4. The City shall be responsible for the entire cost of all work to be performed associated with the reconstruction of Brumlow Avenue which is authorized herein. Nothing contained herein shall ever be construed to place upon the State any liability or injury to or death of persons, or for damage to or loss of property: ansin« from or in any manner connected with the work authorized herein. 6 Any contractor and: or City shall provide for insurance as follows: �. Worker's Compensation Insurance -\mount - Statutor% Pale , of 5F-4 B. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance Amounts - Bodily Injury $500,0DO each occurrence Property Damage S 100.0001 each occurrence C. Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance .-amounts - Bodily Injury S250.000 each person $500,000 each occurrence Property Damage $100,000 each occurrence The State shall be included as an "_-additional Insured" by Endorsement to poicies issued for coverages listed in B and C above. A "Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement' in favor of the State shall be a part of each policy for coverages listed in A, B and C abo` e. An,, contractor and or Citv shall be responsible for any deductions stated in the policy. 7. The State shall make suitable, frequent, and complete inspection of all materials. and equipment, and construction work within the limits of the State's rigi,t `) ' a. in order to determine that the construction meets all applicable requirements of the plans and specifications for operation and maintenance by the State after its completion. The City will provide opportunities, facilities and representative samples, as may be required, to enable the State to carry on suitable, frequent, and complete inspection of all materials, and application methods. sufficient to afford determination and certification by the State that the construction within the limits of the State's right of way complies with the requirements of the approved plans and specifications. The State will promptly notify the City of any failure of materials, equipment or construction methods, and the City will take such measures as necessary to obtain acceptable construction procedures without delay. S The City shall rtotilw Mr. Mark Schluter, P.E . `orth Tarrant Count•; Area Engineer, telephone number (817) 238-5900, Fort `North. Texas, and fir. Zach Sessions, Northeast Tarrant County Maintenance Supervisor, telephone number (817) 283-2731, Euless, Texas. Thev should be notified at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to beginning the work on State owned right of way. 9. %1r. James Ward , Traffic Signal Supervisor, telephone number (817) 370-6671, shall be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to beginning any excavation within the right of way in order that the State may verify the existence of any electrical wiring Failure to provide proper notification will result in the immediate repair at the City's expense 10. All utility companies shall be given prior notification of the pending construction to ensure that no conflicts exist within the project area. All utilities that exist within the project area and will be beneath the pavement as the result of this work. will be required to be adjusted evond the road,Aay surface. page , of 5 5F-5 i 1. This agreement may be terminated by any of the following conditions: i a) By mutual written agreement and consent of both pa ,ies. (b) By the State by notice in writin, to the City as consequence of failure by the City to perform the services set forth in a satisfactor-y manner and within the limits provided. (c) By either party, upon the failure of the other party to fulfill its obligations as set ford: in this agreement. (d) By satisfactor,' completion of all services and obligations described herein. The termination of this agreement shall extinguish all rights, duties, obligations and liabilities of the State and the City under this agreement. If the agreement is terminated. the existin,J roadwav shall be returned to its original cross section and condition l ' This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the partles :ereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the within subject matter. Ili TESTIMONY HEREOF. the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate counterparts. CITY OF SOCTHLAKE, TEXAS Page 4 of`; 5F-6 I\ TESTINIOXA' HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate counterparts. -kTTEST: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TEXAS yped Name Title Date Citv Secretary THE STATE OF TEXAS Executed for the Executive Director and approved by the Texas Transportation Commission under the authority of Stand Alone Manual Notice 98-3 for the purpose and effect of acti�atin` and carrying out the orders, established policies or work programs heretofore approved by the Texas Transportation Commission. Steven E. Simmons, P.E. Typed Name District Envineer Title Date Paue > of 5 5F-7 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 16, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Rick Black, Interim Director of Public Safety (Ext. 2421)1/ SUBJECT: Request for Approval of Change Order No. 1 to CMPA, Inc for the Department of Public Safety West Facility, City of Southlake Project No. 00-3320. Action Requested: Approval of Change Order No. 1 to CMPA, Inc. Background Information: The City of Southlake entered into an agreement with CMPA, Inc for the construction of the Department of Public Safety West Facility on December 12, 2000. To date, two items have come about that have necessitated the issuance of Change Order No. 1 for the project. These are listed below: Item #1— Grade Change After this project had advertised and before the bid opening, Planning requested a grade change on the north side of the facility. In response to that request, the city's architect, Phillips Swager Associates (PSA), made the change and asked for Planning's approval. Approval from Planning was not received until after the bid opening date. Therefore, PSA and staff requested and received a proposal from CMPA to make the change for an increase of $3,080.00. PSA and staff have reviewed this proposal and find it to be acceptable. It is recommended that this change be approved for an increase of $3,080.00. Item #2 —12" Waterline Relocation and French Drain During the installation of the 21-inch storm drain that runs from the facility to Randol Mill, a conflict was discovered with the existing 12-inch waterline that runs along Randol Mill. Since the storm drain is a gravity system, grade is critical and can't be modified without affecting the hydraulic capacity of the storm drain. Therefore, it was necessary to lower the existing waterline to clear the 21-inch storm drain. PSA and staff requested and received a proposal from CMPA to lower the waterline for an increase of $6,100.00. In addition, it appears that the site for this facility contains a considerable amount of groundwater. Some of this water is possibly migrating from the pond located to the north of the site. Furthermore, the natural drainage of the 5G-1 Billy Campbell February 16, 2001 Page 2 Financial Considerations: Citizen Input/ Board Review: Legal Review: Alternatives: area is from east to west and is probably impeded, somewhat, by Randol Mill and FM 1709. This amount of groundwater is of concern due to the fact that an access road to the facility is to be constructed over the storm drain and the water line that run from the facility to Randol Mill. If this material is not dried and compacted, more than likely, the structural integrity of the drive will be compromised. Therefore, all parties agreed that the best solution would be to install a French drain system below and to the side of the 21-inch storm drain with laterals penetrating the waterline ditch that would allow the water to drain from the area. Staff requested and received a proposal from CMPA to install 200 linear feet of French drain and 100 linear feet of lateral drain for an increase of 1,900.00. The total additional cost for the 12-inch waterline relocation and the French drain is as follows: Waterline Relocation $6,100.00 French Drain $1,900.00 Subtotal $8,000.00 10% Contractor's OH&P 800.00 Total $8, 800.00 The Contract currently provides a "Contingency" item in the amount of $150,000.00. Approval of these changes will be included under this "Contingency" item and no change in the Contract Amount or the Contract Time will occur as a result of these changes. As a result of this action, the new balance of the Contingency item is $138,120.00. At its November 1, 2000 meeting, the Crime Control and District Board approved $150,000.00 for the purposes of creating a contingency line item. None No other alternatives exist that would better facilitate the completion of this project. SG-2 Billy Campbell February 16, 2001 Page 3 Supporting Documents: Change Order No. 1 Document Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed this proposal and finds it to be acceptable. It is recommended that this change be approved for an increase of $8,800.00. Staff recommends the placement of the aforementioned Change Order No. 1 on the February 20, 2001 City Council Agenda for approval. RB/rb 5G-3 CHANGE ORDER No. 1 Dated: January 25, 2001 OWNER'S Project No. 00-3320 Architect's Project No. 4156.10 Project Department of Public Safety Building — West Facility OWNER City ofSouthlake Contract for Construction of the DPS West Facility Contract Date: 12112100 To: CMPA Inc Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject contract: LM Qy ofSouthlake. Texas Owner Billy Campbell Title: Ci1y Manager Date: 2001 Nature of the changes:Field modifications as follows: Item 1: Grade Change (RFP #1) 1 is Grade change as requested Planning Item 2: Waterline Relocation and French Drain_ RFP #3 2 ea. Emergency waterline connection to existing 20 if 12" PVC C-900 waterline 1 is Ductile iron waterline fittings 4 ea. Thrust blocking 1 is Temporary thrust blocking 2001f 4" French drain 100 ea 20' lateral drain w/rock and fabric 1 is Contractor's Overhead & Profit 1 SG-4 @ 3,080.00 = 3$ ,080.00 Subtotal $3, 080.00 @ $ 950.00 = $1,900.00 @ 50.00 = 1,000.00 @ 2,100.00 = 2,100.00 @ 150.00 = 600.00 @ 500.00 = 500.00 @ 8.00 = 1,600.00 @ 3.00 = 300.00 @ 10.0% = 800.00 Subtotal $ 8,800.00 TOTAL $11,880.00 General Conditions — Contingency Change Item No. 1 Balance in Contingency These changes result in the following adjustment of contract price and contract time: $150,000.00 <$11,868.00> $138,120.00 Contract Price Prior to this Change Order $ 3, 375, 500.00 Net Increase Resulting from this Change Order $ 0.00 Current Contract Price Including this Change Order $ 3,375,500.00 Contract Time Prior to this Change 365 days (Days or Date) Net Increase Resulting from this Change Order 0 days (Days) Current Contract Time Including this Change Order 365 days (Days or Date) The above changes are recommended: The above changes are recommended: NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B (1978 Edition) Phill.,ps. Swager Associates Architect/Engineer M Date: 2001 City ofSouthlake City By: Title: Construction Manager Date: 12001 2 SG-S The above changes are accepted: CMPA. Inc. Contractor 0 Title: Date: 5G-6 2001 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 20, 2001 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Mike Hutchison, Senior Civil Engineer, ext. 2361 Subject: Public Hearing for 2001 Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) for Oak Lane paving project and approve engineering services agreement with Cheatham and Associates for the development of construction plans and specifications. Action Requested: Staff s project recommendation for the 2001 Tarrant County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is construction of paving improvements on Oak Lane. Staff seeks council authorization to continue with the application process for the 271h year CDBG program and to approve the engineering services agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the development of construction plans and specifications for this project. Background Information: In FY 1999 and FY 2000, the Council authorized the submittal of sanitary sewer and water line CDBG projects for the Oak Lane Subdivision. These projects were considered to be the first two in a three-year series of projects for Oak Lane, with paving improvements completing the program in FY 2001. Based upon this plan and timing constraints concerning the February 2, 2001 deadline, staff has submitted the CDBG application for this year. The program requires that a public hearing be held for each project submitted. Therefore, staff requests authorization to continue with the application process. The following table depicts a list of past projects that have been funded partially or in full by CDBG funds: CDBG PROGRAM YEAR PROJECT 20TH (1994) 12" Water line along Florence 21'T (1995) 12" Water line along Randol Mill 22`D (1996 Sutton Place Sanitary Sewer 23`-D (1997) Sutton Place Drainage 24T" (1998) Sutton Place Water & Paving 25rx (1999) Oak Lane Sanitary Sewer j 26T" (2000) Oak Lane Water 7A-1 Financial Consideration: The cost for the paving of Oak Lane is estimated at $266,078, including engineering. This estimate does not include any additional drainage improvements that may need to be made once the detailed design work is underway. The CDBG program has historically allocated approximately $100,000 to these projects, although the exact amount will not be known until the grant projects are selected. The remaining funds will be included in the FY 2001-2002 CIP. Attached is a copy of the 2001 CDBG application including the detailed cost estimate mentioned above, as well as a project map exhibit. In addition, staff requests approval of the engineering services agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the design of this project. Cheatham & Associates performed the design work for the previous two CDBG projects on Oak Hill, and is consequently familiar with the infrastructure in the area as well as the requirements of the grant process. Citizen Input/ Board Review: There have been several public hearings in the past regarding the improvements to Oak Lane. Previous City Councils have committed to the use of CDBG and City funds for these type of improvements. Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: 2001 CDBG Application Notice of Public Hearing Cheatham & Associates Engineering Services Proposal Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council authorization for Staff to proceed with the CDBG application process for paving improvements to Oak Lane and approval of the engineering services agreement with Cheatham & Associates for the development of construction plans and specifications. MH 7A-2 City of Southlake Department of Public Works Febniar,- 1. 2001 yls. Deborah Seifert Planner Tarrant County Community Development Division 1509B South University Drive, Suite 276 Fort ""orth, Texas 76107 Re: 27`Year CDBG Application Ms. Seifert: I have included three copies of the City of Southlake's 27`" Year CDBG application for your review. The subject project is the last of three projects in the Oak Hill Addition, where the Cite has utilized CDBG funds in the past to install water and sewer infrastructure. This project includes paving and drainage improvements for Oak Lane, which serves all lots in this subdivision. Thank you for ,,our assistance in this process. Please call me with any questions. Respectfully. Michael A. Hutchison, E.I.T. 1400 plain Street. Suite 320 Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481- 2320 * FaX (817) 481-209" 7A-3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 27TH YEAR -- 2001 PROJECT INFORMATION FORM 1 City Name: City of Southlake, Texas 2 City's 3-Year Goals and Plans for Community Development Projects: Complete upgrade of major infrastructure in area of low to moderate income (Oak Lane sanitary sewer, water, & paving) 3 Project Location (Complete Address, FEMA Map and MAPSCO Coordinates): Oak Lane in west Quadrant of Southlake, TX - FEMA map # 48439COl85, MAPSCO # 11 W (1996 edition) 4 Census Tract: 1139-01 5 Type of Project: Paving reconstruction 6 Cost/Engineering Estimate: $266,078 7 Funding Source: 27th Year CDBG Grant Funds/City Funds 8 City Match Amount: $166,078 9 Engineering Firm: Cheatham & Associates 1601 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 200 Arlington, Texas 76011 Engineering Contact: Eddie Cheatham, P.E. 817-546-0696 10 Date of Public Hearing: February 20, 2001, documentation to follow (include verification) 11 City Contact Person: Michael A Hutchison, E.I.T. 12 Date of Submittal: 1-Feb-01 7A-4 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 1 Detailed Project Description: Hot Mix asphalt paving construction will replace existing scrap shingle with thin asphalt overlay street. The proposed paving is the last of a three - phase program for Oak Lane. (sewer, water, & paving) 2 Detailed Project Purpose: The project will provide improved drainage and riding surface for residents on Oak Lane. The installation of water and sewer lines has severely damaged the existing pavements, causing an increase in potholes and poor drainage conditions. 3 Environmental Conditions: Small manufactured housing neighborhood of low to moderate income residents. 4 City Enhancement of Target Area (City -funded Projects Only): This project is part of a city-wide program to provide modern utility and transportation services to areas with substandard infrastructure. Required Attachments: X 1 City Map Marking Locations of Project X 2 Project Map X 3 Copy of MAPSCO Map X 4 Detailed Cost Estimate X 5 Completed Environmental Review/Stationary Checklist X 6 Copy of FEMA Flood Plain Map, Revised 8/2/95 N/A 7 All documents relevant to environmental decisions Prepared By: (Complete Title, Address, and Telephone) Michael A. Hutchison, E.I.T. Senior Civil Engineer, City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 320 Southlake, Texas 76092 7A-5 REGAL OAKS DR SLEEPY HOLLOW CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CDBG PROJECT EXHIBIT hw OAK HILL MOBILE HOME PARK PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 7A-7 • 3N7:Nl;E0 CN Wt) oao tr. `Grapevine Lake - CT FAra1d L7Mt hk c.I 4,S-ARx 3 R0PHY_ 1,,.,, _ » EvTCn 127, 1. MCam 0-11 _ ' —�'G \''2 �` 3 ,:i ..ec 3 �✓�•� al ,'yin CMap�cI i B:SS 4 J ` 13 TY DEN TONLOUN ILW KIRr •- 31V0,N \ Y _y 1 ♦ \ J `1 nn, ITH LAKE o -:� SUBJECT S U U PROJECT "-- s = i� LOCATIO` ';r3re $ —I — a �--� — _tip. St = y- - 7A-8 DET.91LED COST L• STLV4 TE Cit}•.Name: City of South Datc: February 1 , 2001__ Project Description: Oak Lane Paving Improvements Item No 1 Description Excavation Quantin 3600 CY _j unit ; Price 7.59 Amount i 2 2 3 Stabilization of iCement Lime for subgrade Stabilization100 7200 SY 3.00 I h2 00' 21 12 I 600 ' 4 5 14" HMAC pavement La down Curb 5335 4800 SY LF 10.00 12.00 53 57 350 i 600 j 6 7 ;Concrete Driveway Asphalt Driveway Replacement Replacement 3000 2340 SF SF 4.00 3.00 $12,000 7,020 I 8 � 9 'Petromat Fabric Concrete_ Flume 5336 I 750 SY SF 1.50j$ -_4.001$ 8,004 , 3,000 1 j20% Contingency 40 315 ' E I i i I Funding Match (If Applicable): Citl• Amount: $1 66, 07 Other Sources: $1 00 000 CDBG ) Sub -Total: $241 889 Design/F.ngineering: $ 2 4, 1 8 9 Total Project Cost: $266 , 078 Prepared By: Michael A Hutchison, E I T , Bob Rowley-, P.E. Page 1 of 7A-9 Statutory Checklist Federal 1.3"s and Authorities listed at See. 59.5 Project Name and Identification No. Oak Lane Ar](Ji t i nn /Pavi ncl 971-11 .voa-r snnr_ _ A' `cc Area of Statutory or Providing compliance ,C` � � � doeusnentztlon Regulatory Compliance Additional material may be 44 4C attached �- i C 87 Historic Properties X _ Floodplain Management X Wetlands Protection X Coastal Zone Management X I l Water Quality- Aquifers X Endangered Species X _ Wild and Scenic Rivers X Air Quality X Farmlands Protection X t Manmade Hazards: Thermal/F_xplosive X I I ,voice X i Airport Clear Zones X TO$lc Sires X I Environmental �Ju=sUccX 'Attach eveidence that required actions have been taken. 7A-10 Permits, Licenses, Forms of Corn pliance Under the Laws (Federal, State and Local Laws) Project Name -and Identification No. Oak Lane Addit ' n P. 2 c� � � " Providing compliance OTHER AREAS OF STATUTORY o{ ��' c documentation AND BEGULATORY C0:NPLL4NCEAPPLICABLE TO Additional material mnr Dc PROJECT attached Flood Insurance X Coastal Barriers X Airport Clear Zone j Notification X Water Quslity X Solid Walt Disposal X Fish and Wildlife X State or Local Statutes (to be added by local community) X _ IN Prepared by- Michael A, Hutchison, EIT Titic: Senior Civil City of Southlake 1400 Main Street Suite 320 ou a e, Texas 92 Date: 1 / 3 0 / 01 7A-11 CITY OF V ESTLAKE KL rR ul00C Bra c,. r 6� ,1 r ZONE AE i i Bjtk- 1 PROJECT LOC ATIO` ^ J I { � s <j I �1\ CIT 1- C F KELLER ' S060? t 1 �_ i ZONE Ac ZONE X =j- =<_ ZONE X _ \ 3 T.kMA-`'T COUN- L-N,-rIC0RP0RkTED u7j ZONE :5y= X <, ZONE All Jj ZONE S919 z I I ZONE XI ZC I 60 j — o? ZON= A- z his 616 - — C) ZONE X- 5__c-, { DOS7 OAK ZONE X ZONE X ZONE X z 7A-12 ZONE X FAM City of Southlake Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE is hereby given to all interested persons that the City Council of the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas will hold a public hearing on February 20, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of Town Hall, 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas. The purpose of the meeting is to provide an open forum to receive citizen views, questions, and concerns regarding the 271h Program Year of the Tarrant County Community Development Block Grant Program. All interested parties are urged to attend. Improvements planned for this grant application include paving improvements within the Oak Lane Addition in the western portion of the City. For further information, contact Mike Hutchison in the City of Southlake's Engineering Department at the address above or by telephone at (817) 481-2361. 7A-13 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES February 7, 2001 Mr. Pedram Farahnak, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 320 Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Proposal for Providing Professional Services in Connection with the Design of Street and Drainage Improvements for Oak Hill Mobile Home Park (27`h Year CDBG) CONSULTANT'S UNDERSTANDING The City of Southlake is currently proposing to construct street and drainage improvements, to serve the Oak Hill Mobile Home Park. Over the past two years, the City of Southlake has used the 25'' and 26`h Year Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) to upgrade the water and sanitary sewer systems in the Oak Hill Mobil Home Park. It is now proposed that the funds for the-2 7" Year Block Grant be used to repave the streets, and clean the ditches. We are proposing to mix the existing street paving material with cement stabilization and compact this material, to serve as base material. Then 4" of HMAC overlay would be constructed upon this subgrade. The drainage ditches will be, re -worked and cleaned. However, we are not proposing an extensive amount of new drainage infrastructure. Basically, the system will continue to function as it exists today, due to limited budget constraints for off -site drainage improvements. This project is partially funded by a 27`h Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), which is a federally funded program administered by Tarrant County. Due to the scope of the project, the CDBG grant is not adequate to fund the entire project. The grant amounts to approximately $90,000. leaving approximately $176,000 to be funded by the City. However, this proposal relates to the engineering and surveying for the entire project. The project will include the surveying, design, bidding, and contract administration of the proposed construction, as follows: SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Surveying 1.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary surveying field and office work necessary to perform the engineering design and to prepare construction plans. 1.2 We will also furnish all construction staking. 1.3 Surveying for easement preparation, if required, will also be furnished. (See Item 3.2) ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 76011 817/548-0696 • Metro 265-RR-46 • Fax 817/265-8532 7A-14 Mr. Pedram Frahnak, P.E. February 7, 2001 City of Southlake Pac,e 2 2.0 Engineering 2.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary technical expertise required to accomplish the engineering design of the street and drainage improvements. The design will be in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. 2.2 Our firm will then prepare construction plans, specifications and contract documents based on the engineering design. 2.3 We will assist in the advertising for and taking of construction bids. We will issue any required addendums. Our firm will assist in the processing of contract documents after contract award and will issue notice -to -proceed. 2.4 Periodic on -site visits by an engineer will take place during construction. We will issue and process any required change orders. 2.5 We will provide assistance in conducting the final inspection and issuance of certificate of completion. 3.0 Easements (if required) 3.1 Our firm will conduct the search for deeds and conduct other research at the Tarrant County Courthouse necessary for the preparation of the required easements. 3.2 We will then prepare the legal (metes & bounds) descriptions of the easements with computer plotting. This work element also includes the surveying work necessary to prepare easements and to tie easements to the base line(s). 3.3 This element includes preparation of the final written easement document and of the accompanying drawing. 3.4 This proposal does not contemplate our firm providing assistance in acquiring property owner's signatures, nor participating in any condemnation proceedings without additional compensation. 4.0 Inspection 4.1 We will not furnish full-time on -site construction inspection, but will make periodic visits to the site, and will be available for plan interpretations. FEES We will provide all the services and products described in the scope of services including all services necessary for engineering surveying, engineering, preparation of construction plans and specifications, preparation of construction cost estimates, contract administration, construction staking and periodic visits during construction, and as -built plans for a flat fee of $18,255.00 for engineering, and $5,900.00 for surveying, including design surveys and construction staking. It is assumed that the sewer lines will be constructed within city street right-of-way, and no private easements will be required. If easements are necessary, they will be provided at an additional fee to be agreed to by the city. (See attachment "A" for cost breakdown.) 7A-15 Mr. Pedram Frahnak, P.E. City of Southiake TERMS February 7, 2001 Page 3 Invoicing will be based on percentage of completion. Billing will normally occur around the first of each month and payment expected within ten working days. GUARANTEE Cheatham & Associates guarantee to maintain the fees presented herein for 90 days from the date of this proposal unchanged. If the above meets with your approval, this proposal can also serve as our agreement, which you may indicate by signing in the space provided below. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or requested modifications of the proposal. The opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Southlake is greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. FAWORD\PROPOSAL\Southlak\Oak Hill 27th Yr.wpd AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: Accepted this Title: day of 7A-16 12001 ATTACHMENT "A" ENGINEERING/SURVEYING FEE CALCULATION: PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE: Field Crew $ 75.00 x 20.5 hrs. ..S 1,540.00 Staff Engineer $ 75.00 x 23 hrs..... $ 1,725.00 Cad Technician $ 55.00 x 60 hrs.... $ 3,300.00 SUB -TOTAL ....... $ 7,725.00 FINAL DESIGN PHASE: Staff Engineer Cad Technician CONSTRUCTION PHASE: Field Crew Staff Engineer $ 75.00 x 60 hrs..... $ 4,500.00 $ 55.00 x 126 hrs..... $ 6,930.00 SUB -TOTAL ...... $ 11,430.00 $ 75.00 x 58 hrs..... $ 4,360.00 $ 75.00 x 24 hrs..... $ 1,800.00 SUB -TOTAL ......... $ 6,160.00 TOTAL SURVEYING ................................. $ 5,900.00 TOTAL ENGINEERING .................................... . $ 18,255.00 TOTAL FEE ........................................ $ 24,155.00 7A-17 CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE SHEET 1 OF 1 JOB NO. 001-245 OWNER: Tarrant County/City of Southlake JOB NAME: 27th Year CDBG - Paving Improvements to Oak Hill Mobile Home Park DATE: Janua 31,2001 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT TOTAL NO QTY. PRICE COST 1 EXCAVATION C.Y. 3,600 7.501 $27.000 2 STABILIZATION OF SUBGRADE S.Y. 7,200 3.00 $21,600 3 CEMENTiLIME FOR STABILIZATION TON 100 120.00 $12,000 4 4" HMAC PAVEMENT S.Y. 5,335 10.00 $53.350 5 LAYDOWN CURB L.F. 4,800 12.00 $57,600 6 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT S.F. 3,000 4.00 $12,000 7 ASPHALT DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT S.F. 2,340 3.00 $7,020 8 PETROMAT FABRIC S.Y. 5,336 1.50 $8,004 9 CONCRETE FLUME S.F. 750 4.00 $3,000 SUBTOTAL CONST. COST $201,574 ENGINEERING $18,255 SURVEYING $5,900 20% CONST. CONTINGENCY $40,271 TOTAL PROJECT COST $266,000 7A-18 F:1QP W%Southlake1245\Er,g ineer. Estimate.wb2 N CASE NO: PROJECT: ZA00-132 uikTri City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 16, 2001 REQUEST: On behalf of James R. Stacy, QuikTrip Corporation is requesting approval of a Rezoning and Site Plan. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing. 2. Consider rezoning and site plan request. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Developer Comments (F) Surrounding Property Owner Map (G) Surrounding Property Owner Letters (H) Ordinance No. 480-355 (I) Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2046) Case No. ZA00-132 Agenda Item 713 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: James R. Stacy APPLICANT: QuikTrip Corporation PROPERTY SITUATION: On the southwest corner of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Commerce Street. HISTORY: This is part of the Commerce Business Park which was zoned and developed as a light industrial business park in 1986. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Lots 1 & 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, being 3.029 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and Industrial CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I-1" Light Industrial District uses and the retail sale of furniture. REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses including a gas station convenience store. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have 130' of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this roadway. The Master Thoroughfare Plan makes no recommendation for Commerce Drive. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have one (1) access directly on to Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) from a private drive west of the site and one (1) access onto Commerce Street. Commerce Drive- is a two (2) north/south local roadway with a two (2) north bound lanes at its intersection with F.M. 1709. E. Southlake Boulevard -is a five lane, undivided arterial with a continuous, two-way, center left turn lane. The roadway will ultimately be widen to a seven lane roadway. A traffic signal has been installed at the intersection of E. Southlake Boulevard and Commerce. Gateway Drive- is a four (4) lane undivided arterial that begins at Southlake Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-132 7B Page 1 DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT WATER AND SEWER: ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: Boulevard and terminates at the east bound State Highway 114 frontage road. May, 2000 traffic counts on F.M.1709 (between S.H. 114 & Kimball Avenue): Table #1 24hr West Bound (WB) (22,288 East Bound (EB) (21,042 WB Peak A.M. 1,313 1 .m-2 p.m. Peak P.M. 2,280 5 .m.-6 p.m. EB Peak A.M. 1,930 7a.m-8a.m Peak P.M. 1,315 5 .m.-6 .m Traffic Impact The I.T.E. Manual projects the site will generate a total of 3,910 vehicle trips per day, with 381 vehicle trips during the A.M. peak traffic period and 472 vehicle trips in the P.M. peak. It is estimated that 56% of the vehicle trips will be pass -by trips and that 31 % will be diverted linked trips. Therefore, only about 13% or 509 vehicle trips per day will be Primary Trips (new trips added to the road system). During the A.M. and P.M. peak periods, it is estimated that the site will create SO new vehicle trips in the morning and 61 new trips in the evening. Therefore, the traffic impact of the site on Southlake Boulevard traffic volumes during A.M. and P.M. peaks times is minimal. Please note that this is a statistical average of convenience stores/gas stations across the country and local circumstances will vary. Trnffir C'.PnPrntinn Rates, Table #2 AM- IN* AM OUT PM- IN PM- OUT 24-HR IN 24 HR OUT Total VTPD Gas Station 194 187 236 236 1,955 1,955 13,910 Storm water is primarily being carried into an existing 30" under ground RCP storm water pipe located under Commerce Street and Southlake Boulevard by an on -site under ground storm water system. Connection to the existing 6" sewer line located in Commerce Street and 12" water line located in Southlake Boulevard is proposed. Water S5,947.65 Assumes 1 — 2" simple meter Wastewater S3,706.37 (Assumes 1 — 2" simple meter Roadway S8 373.36 (SA 2, w/24 fueling positions) * Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of Building Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-132 713 Page 2 P&Z ACTION: February 8, 2001; Approved (4-2) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated February 2, 2001, allowing the variance to item #1 (articulation) and item #2 (pitched roof). P&Z SPEAKERS: STAFF COMMENTS In Favor Qualified In Favor Opposed Other 2 Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated February 2, 2001. When requested as a Specific Use Permit, the City's Zoning Ordinance requires all gasoline service stations on the F.M. 1709 corridor be located at signalized arterial intersections (as defined in the city's Master Thoroughfare Plan). The Thoroughfare Plan does not provide a definition. The requirement is designed to ensure that the supporting street infrastructure can handle higher volumes of traffic during peak hours of traffic loading (Ordinance 480, Section 45.10). The subject site is located at the signalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (Arterial), Gateway Drive (arterial) and Commerce Street (local street). Staff finds that, although the applicant is not bound by this requirement, this location meets the criteria for the Specific Use Permit, because the existing signal and infrastructure will readily accommodate demand. The applicant is requesting variances to the following: • Horizontal articulation on a portion of the north building facade required by Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.9cId, under the provisions of Ord. 480, Sect. 43.9b; • Pitched Roof on the convenience store building, required by Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.9c lb, under the provisions of Ord. 480, Sect. 43.9b; Pitched Roof on the pump canopy, required by SUP Gas Station Regulations, Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.10. A mansard type roof system is proposed as a regulation under the provisions of Ord. 480, Sect. 31, "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District; V,Community Development\WP- FILE S\MEMO\2000cases\00-132ZS.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-132 7B Page 3 'KWY EAST SOS. PPRK Case No. ZA00-132 Vicinity Map Quicktrip 114 2 � D�a—SOU�NIA E � --- a -' �O N p1JNC '— �� i ERC / $uS�NEg COW � F F BUSINESS 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet W E S Agenda Item 7B Attachment B Page 1 Case No. - . -- --- - ZA00-'132 1 IM ` h wa71 .I IN iiiiii? p ifil iQ4 ip � g .� ji s3�2 c _T .Q _—'--__ _..—f = iR AA ii i a ,r< s ! 1 F� 911. -, ��Y q �t� � s t t +.YS • 3 �� 9j7i}c�� qqY� �� .� Z 1 t SS Y i1', �I ➢'fl 7t iI 1l #3"j^G 3. � R� 4 CXb MH � � r �� • Y I' 1 ^nt d - —-,L33J.LS 33�I3WW03.. Ag!nda,)te4 i- ,�1 716 1 s h ent C Page 1 Z s VC - a 1 � I I tl. LL O u U o llm - � 1 �� 1 + Eualsnzuag PE8 DEleulwnlp I»a D'+Ivuux�el e r-H I ,D n I; .,nolS w� N I: y W N J Im Case No. ZA00-131 N O FGF cz > j >^' LL - - W L _1 LJJ m \ o'Na ml:y' C NSsm ' in m Z• m m 001%JU Ua to �I I c O L _ 1: t6 I; I; W o' ^ ^1^i t 2 \ to l I 1 y.m 11' I � I' t I II r o m' I i n li I I 1 I. I I I m b+� � v'ao: I '.I C O y W m! I N A iC e 2 L(1'I' r (17-1'1 IM IM pueg . pwteuiwmll Pay - - uwnio� y>tig at 1-7 mg VIDSP j , wu6edwe4� locy alBurvc _ Case No. ZA00-13Z 0" nwnlo� ynog wuolcwznmg logy al6ulLIS pu- g paleununlll Pau PiDSPj wuBPAweVp �ewW A'S ours long a�6niag Do'g paleuliunlll Day . auGv.fuwml� Irtayy uu:np� Haug rnrol<ammg C O ca _d W LLi u-� E El E El 5 is E 'n E E °c E � ohs ° mlm LL Agenda Item '7 6 O Ol M U) W I ca CO C � 1 C > O O 9 LL W (n U O O LL vv�t cz m 3 �O Y p m x Jn♦ o Y v o— W '0 N O — a�0N.t3� O in a p Vf VI .m m Z V OON VUo_ut Attachment C Page 3 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 00-132 Review No: Two Date of Review: 2/01/01 Project Name: Site Plan Quicktrip Lot 1 Block B Commerce Business Park APPLICANT: uicktriD Comoration PO Box 3475 Tulsa OK 74101 Phone: (817) 358-7695 Fax: (817) 858-0213 Attn: Steve Walker ARCHITECT: The Hoover/Klein Group Inc. 1361 W. Euless Boulevard, Suite 99 Euless TX 76040 Phone: (817) 283-8830 Fax: (817) 283-9189 Attn: Brvan Klein CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1122101 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073. Vertical and Horizontal articulation is required along the north, west and east facades. The north fagade does not comply with horizontal articulation (see attached chart). (Variance Requested) 2. Corridor Overlay and Gas Station regulations requires a full "pitched roof construction" on the building and canopy. Plan proposes a pitched roof on the main structure with a flat deck on the south portion of the building for mechanical equipment and a mansard type roof system on the canopy. (Variance Requested) Show driveway locations along the north side of Southlake Boulevard. Show and label Gateway Plaza Addition, Cab. A, Slide 5365 & 5366. Show and label Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 of this plat. 4. Show (with dashed line) and label the 20' Type `O' Bufferyard along the north property line on the graphic and show and label a 50' building line along the property line. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-132 7B Pagel INFOP,Mi ATIONAL COMMENTS * This "S-P-1" Zoning and Site Plan request proposes a Gas Station Convenience Store as a "permitted use" rather than by Specific Use Permit. This plan has been reviewed using the criteria established for Gas Station/Convenience Stores under Ordinance 480, Section 45.10. When requested as a Specific Use Permit, the City's Zoning Ordinance requires all gasoline service stations on the F.M. 1709 corridor be located at signalized arterial intersections (as defined in the city's Master Thoroughfare Plan). The Thoroughfare Plan does not provide a definition. The requirement is designed to ensure that the supporting street infrastructure can handle higher volumes of traffic during peak hours of traffic loading (Ordinance 480, Section 45.10). The subject site is located at the signalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (Arterial), Gateway Drive (arterial) and Commerce Street (local street). Staff finds that, although the applicant is not bound by this requirement, this location meets the criteria for the Specific Use Permit, because the existing signal and infrastructure will readily accommodate demand. Although the west driveway intersecting E. Southlake Blvd. does not meet spacing requirements, this driveway is existing and was previously approved as a common access driveway. Please be aware that an Amended Plat (if no easements are to be abandoned or relocated) or a Plat Revision must be approved and filed in the County Plat Records prior to issuance of any building permit on this site. Also, it should be noted that there is an approved site plan associated with the S-P-1 zoning for the Stacy Furniture site. Approval of this request will require, at minimum, approval of a revised site plan and possibly a rezoning of the Stacy Furniture site prior to any construction on that property. * The proposed site does not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage of 75% for the "C-3" Zoning District. The impervious coverage area percentage of this is approximately 72%. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. cc: Steve Walker, Quicktrip Corporation VIA FAX: ABOVE Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-132 7B Page2 Articulation Evaluation No.2 Case No. ZA 00-132 Date of Evaluation: 02/01 /01 Elevations for Quick Trip Received: 01 / 22/ 01 Front - facing: North Wall ht. = 15 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 45 71 58% No 45 32 -29% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 3 50% Yes 2 2 0% Yes Min. artic. length 1 1 9 -18% No 8 16 100% Yes Rear - facing South Not Required, faSade is not visible from Southlake Boulevard Right - facing: Nest Wall ht. = 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 54 22 -59% Yes 54 22 -59% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 7 133% Yes Min. artic. length 6 111 100% Yes 6 1 1 83% Yes Left - facinb: East Wall ht. = 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 54 22 -59% Yes 54 22 -59% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 7 133% Yes Min. artic. length 6 11 83%_ Yes 6 1 1 83% Yes R., Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D Pa ZA00-132 7B ge 3 02/02/2001 10:58 9727454222 PAGE 02 McDonald Associates, PLLc February 2, 2001 Dennis Killough Senior Planner City of Southlake 1400 Main Street Southlake, Texas 76092 Writer's Direct Dian (972) 745-4301 Writer's E-Maly mcdonald@landusetx,com Re: Case ZA 00-132- Variance Request - Roof Structures Dear Dennis: Pursuant to our earlier conversations, QuikTrip respectfully requests two variances to Section 45.10 of the Zoning Ordinance that requires gabled or hipped roofs for service station convenience stores and pump canopies. I want to be clear up front, that QuikTrip is willing to comply with this provision in both instances, however, we believe that in this instance, strict adherence to Section 45.10 will actually produce a less desirable development for the citizens of Southlake. QuikTrip is requesting an alternate roof design on the rear of the convenience store to allow all mechanical equipment to be placed on the roof rather than on the ground behind the building. Secondly, QuikTrip is requesting to, place a mansard roof on the pump canopy rather than a full hip roof to reduce the height of the structure. QuikTrip understands the community's purpose in requiring buildings on FM 1709 to have a pitched roof. QuikTrip would like to utilize this roof design element to screen the mechanical equipment that would otherwise be placed behind the building. Because this site is a corner lot, QuikTrip believes that the view from Commerce Street should be architecturally compatible with the front of the building. You will notice that there are four pilasters and landscaping along the rear of the building to accomplish this goal. QuikTrip's mechanical equipment will be located on the flat roof portion of the building and will be fully screened from the roadway. Further, because of the proposed design, it will be difficult, if not impossible to tell that a portion of the roof is flat and not pitched like the remainder of the roof. We will have, for your review, renderings showing both design scenarios. QuikTrip's second request is to allow a mansard roof on the pump canopy instead of the full hipped roof requirement. A hipped roof will increase the overall height of the canopy structure by 10 feet - 4 inches A roof of this size will be detrimental to the overall REC'D F Eb 0 2 20n1 Case r43o N. Denton Tap, Suitel00 " Coppell, TXpAI,0jYtenfhone 972-745-4300 - - Fax 972-745-42Mtachment E ZA00-132 7 18 Page 1 02/02/2001 10:58 9727454222 PAGE 03 Dennis Killough February 2, 2001 Page 2 aesthetics of the development. QuikTrip's proposed mansard design increases the overall height of the canopy structure by 5 feet. We believe that the mansard roof design accomplishes the goal of the community and will produce a better design for the site. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at (972) 745-4301. With kind regards, Brenda N. McDonald M. Randy Krause, QuikTrip Chad Stanford, QuikTrip Steve Walker, QuikTrip Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E P ZA00-132 719 age 2 Surrounding Property Owners �- Quicktrip 1. Wyndham Properties Ltd 1. S-P-2 1. MixeQ Use 1. 2. Wyndham Properties Ltd 2. S-P-2 2. Mixed Use 2. 3. Wyndham Properties Ltd 3. S-P-2 3. Mixed Use 3• 4. Anderson, Stephen P 4. I-1 4. Retail Commercial 4. 5. H K Marvin Ltd Prtshp 5. 1-1 5. Indus~~al 5• 6. Stacy, James R 6. S-P-1 6. Industrial 6. 7. Shurgard Texas Limited Prtn 7. S-P-2 7. Industrial 7• 8. Caddy Property Mgmt 8. S-P-2 8. Retail Commercial 8. 9. Jaqua Enterprises 9. S-P-2 9. Retail Commercial 9. 0.05 1.03 0.77 2.02 4.93 4.57 1.95 0.70 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-132 7B Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses QuikTrip NOTICES SENT: Seven RESPONSES: None Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-132 7B Pagel CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-355 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK B, COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK, BEING 3.029 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO ALLOW "I- 1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT USES AND THE RETAIL SALE OF FURNITURE TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES INCLUDING A GAS STATION CONVENIENCE STORE AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-132 7B Page 1 (W and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "I-1" Light Industrial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I-1" Light Industrial District uses and the retail sale of furniture under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-132 7B Page 2 throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-132 7B Page 3 amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being portions of Lots 1 and 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, being 3.029 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "I-1" Light Industrial District and "S-P-l" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I-l" Light Industrial District uses and the retail sale of furniture to S-P-1 Detailed Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses including a gas station convenience store as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-132 7B Page 4 water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all r violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-132 7B Page 5 zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-132 7B Page 6 .,• PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-132 7B Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being 3.029 acres. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-132 7B Page 8 A Case No. ZAOO-132 EXHIBIT "B" T H 15� uj (L LU G!f.— 82 a IT: Q --a L�o .. '.-i vi- V:; L ...... ....... I I i�r�ell jjq w joHan 00 F 1 IT Agenda Item 7B Up Attachment H Page 9 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Agenda Item Attachment H Case No. 7B Page 10 ZA00-132 City of Southlake o Department of Planning 00, STAFF REPORT February 16, 2001 CASE NO: ZA00-143 PROJECT: Packaged beer sales for off -premise consumption REQUEST: QuikTrip Corporation is requesting approval of a Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off -premise consumption per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (1) and Section 45.6. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct Public Hearing. 2. Consider Specific Use Permit. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Site Exhibit (D) Surrounding Property Owner Map (E) Surrounding Property Owner Responses (F) Resolution No. 01-008 STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-143 7C BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: James R. Stacy APPLICANT: QuikTrip Corporation PROPERTY SITUATION: On the southwest corner of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Commerce Street. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Lots 1 & 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, being 3.029 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and Industrial CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I-1" Light Industrial District uses and the retail sale of furniture. P&Z ACTION: February 8, 2001; Approved (5-0). P&Z SPEAKERS: None. STAFF COMMENTS: A site exhibit is included as attachment `C' of this packet. This request is subject to an appropriate change of zoning request and site plan approval �W (pending Case No. ZA00-132). Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-143 7C Page 1 N Vicinity Map Quicktrip 'KWY EAST OUP SUS• PP —Aar '��O V ��_ i;� � � 1J ��/- S0H 0L �CORNERSTONE' CO� MMERENE _-BUSINESS I� ; -: -PARK- E%CHAN 9L VA 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet N M E S Case No. Attachment B ZA00-143 Agenda Item 7C Page 1 106 "I" wl;[- 0,33H IN Case No. ZA00-143 E f I I e I I hS 5 i -- _. - L3327LS 30X3➢Y OJ'` Agenda Item 7C 7_ uj p Y - =�O Irl f 4 N s I- Attachment C Page 1 Im m Case No. Z A00-143 =_ o �� _ = L 3 a a - CD oom�c°�et Y - W 31 o' io 3 II III; - NiT' �. D 1 i W �I e�nt a Item IC Attachrn 0 C 3P ge 2 I ,,•, • .,, t- n,)-,,, I nn,q ':wrlc i �tg auotsazuPlg - :ccy alaulvS - - Pueq Paie�: nll Hill Pay -- zlPsei ?uaedweV� lewyy - uGlg ,.,y a16uI:IC Patv�.;i;urlll Pay c O > v1 i�:tiv�ti 11 v�l7 W �taYl O mna� Z Yvq �um�a.nn:q c O M m W G1 i� I 0 0 E E o C � � 0 OLL c u c_ > Y O Y a p 5 w m N m � � N t p N 9 9 (n aS N c a= n a Y a y = r r[ ` m 9 V O�OfnU� UCL CIO iC _N n W m N .a- 7 O v W L O � > Vl II F� - w cO LL a Case No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZAOO-143 I Page 3 Surrounding Property Owners Quicktrip 1. Wyndham Properties Ltd 1. S-P-2 1. Mixed Use 1. 32.00 2. Wyndham Properties Ltd 2. S-P-2 2. Mixed Use 2. 0.05 3. Wyndham Properties Ltd 3. S-P-2 3. Mixed Use 3. 1.03 4. Anderson, Stephen P 4. I-1 4. Retail Commercial 4. 0.77 5. H K Marvin Ltd Prtshp 5. I-1 5. Industrial 5. 2.02 6. Stacy, James R 6. S-P-1 6. Industrial 6. 4.93 7. Shurgard Texas Limited Prm 7. S-P-2 7. Industrial 7. 4.57 8. Caddy Property Memt 8. S-P-2 8. Retail Commercial 8. 1.95 9. Jaqua Enterprises 9. S-P-2 9. Retail Commercial 9. 0.70 Case No. ZA00-143 Agenda Item 7C Attachment D Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Packaged beer sales for off -premise consumption NOTICES SENT: Seven RESPONSES: None Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-143 7C Page 1 Resolution No.01-008 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO.01-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF BEER FOR OFF -PREMISE CONSUMPTION ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK B, COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK, BEING 3.209 ACRES, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for the sale of beer for off -premise consumption has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "I-1" Light Industrial District and "S-P-l" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I-1" Light Industrial District uses and the retail sale of furniture; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.1 (1) and 45.6 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the sale of beer for off -premise consumption on Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-143 7C Page 1 Resolution No. 01-008 Page 2 the property being legally described as portions of Lots 1 and 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, being 3.029 acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", and as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Any other conditions of this Specific Use Permit as stated in the motion made by the City Council at the regular meeting on February 20, 2001, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2001. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-143 7C Page 2 Resolution No.01-008 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-143 7C Page 3 Resolution No.01-008 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Block B, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being 3.029 acres. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-143 7C Page 4 M Resolution No.01-008 Page 5 Case No. ZA00-143 lent F Page 5 Resolution No.01-008 Page 6 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-143 7C Page 6 City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 16, 2001 CASE NO: ZA00-133 PROJECT: Parker's Corner REQUEST: Drews Realty Group is requesting approval of a Rezoning and Concept Plan ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing. 2. Consider rezoning and concept plan request. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Concept Plan Review Summary (E) Developer Comments (F) Surrounding Property Owner Map (G) Surrounding Property Owner Letters (H) Ordinance No. 480-356 (1) Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (481-2046) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-133 7D Lq BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Drews Realty Group APPLICANT: Drews Realty Group PROPERTY SITUATION: On the west side of Davis Boulevard (F.M. 1938) approximately 350' south of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). HISTORY: 1981-Final Plat approved by City Council. 1994-Plat revision approved by City Council LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 5R1, Parker's Corner; and Tracts 2A3 and 7A, Jessie G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18; and being 2.959 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and 100 Year Flood Plain CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends 130' of right-of-way (R.O.W.) for Davis Boulevard. Adequate R.O.W. currently exists. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have one (1) access directly on to Davis Boulevard (F.M. 1938). Davis Boulevard is a 4-lane undivided roadway. The nearest drive to the north is located 431' away from the proposed drive location (Variance has been requested). The nearest drive to the south is 520' from the proposed drive location. At its intersection at Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), F.M. 1938 is a five (5) lane cross section with one (1) left hand turn lane, one through lane, and (1) one right hand turn lane. F.M. 1938 is designed to ultimately accommodate a six (6) lane undivided roadway. Once expanded, the capacity of F.M. 1938 will be approximately 40,000 vehicle trips per day. F.M. 1938 currently carries 22,681 vehicle trips per day. It has a capacity of 30,000 vehicles daily under its current design. During the A.M. Peak, this road carries 1,853 vehicles per hour while the P.M. carries a total of 1,927 vehicles per hour. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-133 7D Page 1 May, 2000 traffic counts on F.M. 1938 (between F.M. 1709 & Continental Avenue): Table #1 24hr North Bound (NB) 11,900 South Bound (SB) (10,781 NB Peak A.M. 1,125 7 a.m-8 a.m. Peak P.M. 851 5 .m.-6 p.m. SB Peak A.M. 728 7a.m-8a.m Peak P.M. 1,076 5 .m.-6 .m Traffic Impact The normal hours of the proposed Sonic Restaurant are from 10 a.m. to 1 Ip.m. Monday through Thursday and from 10 a.m. to 12 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The peak traffic hours of the Sonic restaurant are between 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. and 6 p.m. and 7 p.m. It is projected that during this peak time, the restaurant will generate approximately 80 vehicles for both peak periods. The restaurant is projected to generate an additional 460 vehicle trips per day. The retail portion of the site is projected to generate 162 vehicle trips per day. The peak time for the retail is estimated to be between 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. During the peak hour it is projected that the site will generate 22 trips per hour. Master Trail Plan- The Master Trail Plan recommends an 8 foot off -road pedestrian/bicycle trail along F.M. 1938. The concept plan indicates a trail will be provided. WATER AND SEWER: The site will be served by a 6" water line and a 10" sewer line along F.M. 1938. ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: Water S 15,156 Wastewater $7,196.80 Roadway 54,425 * Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of Building Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. P&Z ACTION: February 8, 2001; Approved (5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 31, 2001, accepting the requested variances for the minimum driveway spacing and minimum stacking depth. P&Z SPEAKERS: None. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-133 71) Page 2 STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 31, 2001. The applicant is requesting the following variances: The drive intersecting Davis Boulevard must have a minimum driveway spacing of 500' from the nearest drive. There is a current drive is located to 431' to the north (See Driveway Ord. 634, Section 5-Table # 1). (Variance request submitted by applicant per Ordinance 634, Section 8.2). Provide the stacking depth from connecting R.O.W. A minimum storage length of 75' is required. Approximately 40' of stacking depth has been provided. (See Driveway Ord. 634, Section 5 for design criteria). (Variance request submitted by applicant per Ordinance 634, Section 8.2). The applicant is proposing the following S-P-2 District Regulations: • The applicant is requesting that the minimum size for a separate building or structure in the district be 1,500 square feet. (The C-2 & C-3 districts have a minimum size 2,000 square foot requirement for separate buildings). The west Type "A" bufferyard is required to be 5' in width (Ordinance 480, Section 42.4.0. There is a 25' section adjacent to the internal drive on the west property line in which the bufferyard does not meet this width requirement. That applicant has requested that the bufferyards be approved as shown. • The drive-in canopies will have pitched roofs. • The drive -in -canopies locations, sizes and setbacks approved as shown on the Concept Plan. N:\Community Development`WP-FILES`uMEM0�2000cases\00-133ZC.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-133 7D Page 3 IN Vicinity Map Parker's Corner REp'EEOAR BRISIDI.GQEN—�- W Tom— 6LIHORA GTiM'f"�\ �� C. i r - - JOHNS6N-RD -r— ��— '!�✓ wEsr soun+lz, AO C — � ^ GQFtNER — Q NO Q o Case No. ZA00-133 CARR ARD HiGi SCHC 001�AKcE 001 R P t iG8 c K __A — � A cc a� (:REENWOOO oRTN - _ _ — DAES —01, -s°"r"-'QS -- GREENBRJgR__ G� PA� � �, 11LYNEV W6R«6:.4 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet 121 W E S Agenda Item 7D Attachment B Page 1 SVX31 A1NMD 1NVUWVl - 3,AV1H1f10$ d0 A11J Ztl-WS 4 ltl-W% 101 a3SOdOWd SV%31 '3AVl-41POS JO J.113 U aUJ0, 1- A.InIj tl3NtlOs.3Sd 'JNI 'anou0 "IV3kI SM3H0 1S3f103tl ONINOZ 935(1 Z-J H11M Z-d-S HOJ NVId ld3'JNOJ 1 t 4 z 4[ lily r y is 689:: �^G F i lit 1 9 E 6 1 O N rA V M H 0^1'H W! d 0 H V A 3 l n 0 9 S I n V d �a y s"ccca t _ yy �i 4 15 .t ,D "Ila4 �s I sae s - , n sy C se No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-133 - - 7-D -- - - - - Page 1 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-133 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 01/31/01 Project Name: Concept Plan — Parker's Corner Lots 5R1-R1 & 5R2-R2 APPLICANT: Drews Realty Group 580 Commerce Street Suite 400 Southlake, TX 76092 ENGINEER: Bury Partners-DFW, Inc. 5310 Harvest Hill Road Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75024 Phone: 972-991-0011 Fax: 972-991-0278 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/22/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT KEN BAKER AT (817) 481-2046. Driveway Issues -Variances Requested 1. The drive intersecting Davis Boulevard must have a minimum driveway spacing of 500' from the nearest drive. There is a current drive is located to 43 F to the north (See Driveway Ord. 634, Section 5-Table #1 ). (Variance request submitted by applicant per Ordinance 634, Section 8.2 -See Section E-pages 1 -Variance #1). 2. Provide the stacking depth from connecting R.O.W. A minimum storage length of 75' is required. Approximately 40' of stacking depth has been provided. (See Driveway Ord. 634, Section 5 for design criteria). (Variance request submitted by applicant per Ordinance 634, Section 8.2-See Section E-page 1-Variance #2). Proposed S-P-2 District Regulations 3. The applicant is requesting that the minimum size for a separate building or structure in the district be 1,500 square feet. (The C-2 & C-3 districts have a minimum size 2,000 square foot requirement for separate buildings). 4. The west Type "A" bufferyard is required to be 5' in width (Ordinance 480, Section 42.4.0. There is a 25' section adjacent to the internal drive on the west property in which the bufferyard does not meet this width requirement. That applicant has requested that the bufferyards be approved as shown on the Concept Plan. 0 The drive-in canopies will have pitched roofs. The drive- in -canopies locations, sizes and setbacks approved as shown on the Concept Plan (See Attachment E-Page 4). Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-133 7D Page 1 INFORv1ATIONAL COMMENTS: P&Z ACTION: February P 8, 2001; Approved (5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 31, 2001, accepting the requested variances for the minimum driveway spacing and minimum stacking depth. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * This review is based on the "C-2" Zoning District Regulations. This site falls within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by Ordinance 480-CC, Section 43, Part III "Residential Adjacency Standards" as well as the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations in Section 43, Part II. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan, the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements: • Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended. • Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended • Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill -over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-133 7D Page 2 Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Denotes Informational Comment cc L:`•.COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\#CPLAN-I.WPD Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-133 71) Page 3 11111111111111 �w 1 111111 1 January , i 1r- C_=v of S^.1aK2 ?_anning a _- Zoning ep RE : CITY CASE # 7.A-00-134 Sonic Drive-in Davis Blvd. Southlake, Texas This leL__- is a request -for variances on the above referenced croject. N _ - ',' RIANC_ D_STA`C- - BETWEEN DR1,�riA.S. - l� r�� 1 1 � 1n � .�.,wAn:- G 1 t� The cen`er .,- the pr c_ used driveway _s 431 fee; from =er of nearest �__,e located _. the r_crt.. w _ch is _ess t ar_ =- requ,red _eer. T-_e __nter s locates at the Sc,,_rheas= cz�_; er _ .ne _ per=_; T7ereT .ra, _ =?et _s ==' naxJmum distance can -e a between -red betwe_ -:e two dr_-,_s and -_,._... an access -__,_ _ Case No. Agenda Item Attachment_ E ZA00-133 1 D PFrn - - - - Page 1 _ U �l `i�....�. NC7 G _`_� �R_ i�)V�__ CLi.i�\C,�,1Y �.,i:.� �.'�✓l'r1�1Gl=l _a ides fcr a 4: S_a Fi_ =_ �_ _-- __..__ _:s_-le ea3_ _✓ LJeSt deD___ ✓_ _ne S�_e. �n;s I:as _ea_ed d __a__ w'__-___ :lard a_^_.-. __-n-_ J__-ve reS._-__ :CJ _t e "''J fool Sa -__g 'deJ_ h . �,'?RIPNCE #3 - COLUNfNS SUS=ORTING CAVOP'_' �S t t �I•��. V.a., _ ^e CDU4 _. _ w4 _- not ._.._ express an c' umT Si ' we-ve-, -__- I Dar.-ina -ca'ces 'rill_ ,^e : nucr_ea _ -:--be s_ee_ scaCed a- __' -`'J" and lcc-. _eC a_ __-e 3--a4e each _ a_.__ng Sparce. ie _: e des:. jn IS _., wrap _ _e w__-- masc._ -, as snowy_ -.. _^-e ea{_e____ __eva__on, . _.__s wall -._-__le _a _ng La<715 3'_vC. on ci e ea__ side of _:na _crccerty. The maS.`).nr - facr-i-_- _ ? co_wTns will match _ne J_cne veneer _ _-e Cua_a. -a o -.._ermedia_e c0- -nns De oa4_-_n-4 _: matchthe cc7 or of ^_e C._. .S na_er_a_. we are requesting __.e in_ermedia_e canozv cc__...^s be painted, in 1_eu .f oeing wrapped in masonry for t_^.e reasGP_S. _ . IS peen . ro::t -'aV_J `?_V , __^_e--sonrV wrapped co_,_._ s a_ _^_e en..... cf --'-e es will ._=-ea_e a l _ r ^asGnry a; cearan. ma_ -yes ing masc__-y G. --- _.:=S are SDaced a_ __._ -^e caJ_ zmaI__- - .._.e?! co!'r._ S _.a-7e r3.7e^_ nz-- _o --e - - 1e tie are _-cncerr: _e--ha: wrapping all, __ the-_ermedla_e c _ ns in masonry wcu'l_ 'a{e __^.e canopy S__..c_Lre appear _oo ..._ SiVe creat4nq a forest cf urge mascnT-y columns. 3. _".e _^.=erm. ed'a—e 5'_eel ._ _W"t_ 3 would be Da4nted to mat _, *tea - -` ard canopy, therefore, the smta__er columns wcula ce _eJJ no__._ea- e ::-an __^_e Maa.._."V wra:Dcec c_1.':ns. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-133 1 p Page 2 ?`P _- - 77� ACC-... ( S.,—` ,��o a The _ .`? _ _ ne es- -s - -e aD _aran_e eJ i ^.g _ 2 Can _ :i =0' _5 3= _ C . 'eCnan_Ca_ i....-_'S ^C create 7-a— make u-_--� _ C Jive _ ? rOC O'T2r the _l �.lny^ 972 art 35K_ng 3 -: e C?^ODI _ CC=-i n i a;l O1 ^: _C! ing the building r e iO1-C'cNj na _�350n5. _re al_ resta'=_y._nts the ki_C-^-2.. will require roof tC^ _-i-- and 2Xna,._s: fans. '7-.-e par'Ge=S na'Te 'been :aS -y^neC ^ge-- =oG ecli m,enc�m, ._ew. ] _-_ I y p_c'e" rCCt WC..._,.. --,._ Dr 17ae 70r SCreenj-a -00= ':CC - e'-' ......_. -rea=e a ^' -._n ed roof a_cng _ne pe-�.me=c- '.Ja__S ar_. =O'•i_ae a _C'Wer _-a= rc'O_ toD ^2^.- -.- area at :he Cen_er c= C_^_2 lding -�a'T1rg :he Ca -^soles cit-ched roof in --.= o: _-e Du 1-4._g' S =ched rOOf wcU'_d crea=e =Wc pitched ._cOf-in2S cn the .^,U-ldin_g faYade. We think we pltcli.ed rCcfs would appear toc complex and -_littered. _ ne -anccv is an i ntr-Cafe Gar- _ he an-4 rp"aaran ce =ne Dlli_Clny^ _n2 _.__2n_ _22 Ca_^.cG125 aesi _ -ncerei_T, YL- chael Taichell, L. P. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E Pa ZA00-133 ID ge 3 Ken Baker From: Q10: ent: Subject: Ken Baker: Terry Clark [tsc-mft@texas.net] Thursday, February 01, 2001 4:14 PM KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us Sonic Drive-thru REFERENCE : SONIC DRIVE-IN DAVIS BOULEVARD SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS CITY CASE # ZA00-134 This letter is to amend our development regulations on the concept plan to include the following : d) Drive in canopy locations, size and setback approval as shown on the Concept Plan. Terry Clark MICHAEL F. TWICHELL, L.P. Case No. ZA00-133 Agenda Item 71) 1 Attachment E Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners Parker's Corner Propertv Owner Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. Lam, Conner 1. AG 1. Office Commercial 1. 2.64 2. Dkv Partners I Lp 2. C-2 2. Retail Commercial 2. 0.66 3. Kwik Kar Lube & Tune 3. S-P-1 3. Retail Commercial 3. 0.51 4. Wendy's International, Inc. 4. C-2 4. Retail Commercial 4. 0.72 5. Southlake JV 5. C-2 5. Retail Commercial 5. 1.10 6. Venus Partners III 6. C-3 6. Retail Commercial 6. 2.56 7. Collins, Ottis F 7. S-P-1 7. Mixed Use 7. 3.63 8. Sheehey, F Rosetta 8. SF-20A 8. Mixed Use 8. 0.39 9. Sheehey, F Rosetta 9. AG 9. Mixed Use 9. 1.24 10. Mantheiy, Joseph Etux Pegg; 10. RE 10. Low Density Residential 10. 5.00 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-133 71) Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Parker's Corner NOTICES SENT: 12 RESPONSES: One response was received from within the 200' notification area: • Roy Mendez, 2335 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received February 1, 2001.) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-133 7D Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-356 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 5R19 PARKER' S CORNER; AND TRACTS 2A3 AND 7A, JESSIE G. ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 18; AND BEING 2.959 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "S- P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 7D Page 1 and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 71) Page 2 throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 71) Page 3 amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a portion of Lot 5R1, Parker's Comer; and Tracts 2A3 and 7A, Jessie G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18; and being 2.959 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C- 2" Local Retail Commercial District uses as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 71) Page 4 water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all ,, violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 71) Page 5 zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 7D Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 7D Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being a portion of Lot 5R1, Parker's Corner, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1858, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and Tracts 2A3 and 7A, Jessie G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18; and being 2.959 acres. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 7D Page 8 IM Case No. ZA00-133 EXHIBIT "B" Sv%31 A1W103 1NVUU11 .. ............�..-. 3)tv.Mims JO A10— �„ ""� '•^'•^ �"'^ Ztl-IUS 1 W-WS 101 035OaOtla SV%31 'TWHIr" 10 A110 •.I^V.1,11I JIt,l �.1JII}j tl3Ntl O0 &W3WVJ 1S', 13H ONM02 13Sn Z-O '�NI 'dnOWD A 1V3M SM3H0 I o— •I Ll H11M Z-d-S HOJ Nv1d 1d3:)N0:) 9 � B E 6 l o"N A V M H 0 O H V A 3 1 n 0 B S I A V 0 -4 I I � s J S \ S Y 7 � i p rW - i I Agenda Item 7D Attachment H Page 9 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-133 7D Page 10 City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 16, 2001 CASE NO: ZA00-135 PROJECT: Proposed Lots 5111-Rl, 5111-R2, & 5R2-R1, Parker's Corner REQUEST: Drews Realty Group is requesting approval of the plat revision for Lots 5R1-RI, 5R1- R2, & 5R2-R1, Parker's Corner. ACTION NEEDED: Consider plat revision. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Plat Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner Responses (G) Blue Line Copies of Plans (for Council and Commission Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073) Case No. ZA00-135 Agenda Item 7E A N BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Drews Realty Group APPLICANT: Drews Realty Group PROPERTY SITUATION: On the west side of Davis Boulevard (F.M. 1938) approximately 350' south of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The purpose of this request is to combine unplatted parcels with the previous platted lots and to revise lot boundaries. HISTORY: The original plat for this property was approved in 1981 and was revised in 1994. This property also includes some unplatted parcels which include previously abandoned and quit claimed portions of State R.O.W. from old F.M. 1938. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 5R1 & 5R2, Parker's Corner; and Tracts 2A3 and 7A, Jessie G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18; and being 3.932 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and 100 Year Flood Plain CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District P&Z ACTION: February 8, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated February 2, 2001. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated February 2, 2001. M"Communit} Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-135PR.doc Case No. ZA00-135 Agenda Item 7E Attachment A Page 1 Vicinity Map Parker's Corner e cT Ord ��-��vT.---� ��T!' ` • �y/�� % I tin��p. JONHS9µ RD ; —i / - WESTaCU_T_HLC CARR HIGi SCHC —�;dnc� X, a-cul--------------- - SS w _ OA p a aN O Z O �- cn Q K Ao` l � 09 - I iOP S cS BEE_ 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet W Case No. ZA00-135 N S Agenda Item 7E E Attachment B Page 1 CQ 0 2 CQ A 7 i (OWVATMa SIAVO 9C61 -N AV.HVN KJ cp Case No. Agenda itein Altachnmt C ZA00-135 7E Page 1 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-135 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 02/02/01 Project Name: Plat Revision — Parker's Corner, Lots 5R1-Rl, 5R1-R2 & 5R2-R1 APPLICANT: Drews Realty Group — John Drews 580 Commerce St. Suite 400 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 251-2258 Fax: SURVEYOR: Bury & Partners — DFW, Inc. 5310 Harvest Hill Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75230 Phone: (972) 991-0011 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/22/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, nT CA CU !`lIATT A Or T*%E XTATTC TITT T QT T!"'_L7 A T /S 1 W7 J 41_ ;Q 1. Plat approval is subject to appropriate change of zoning approval on affected parcels. 2. The common access easement (CAE) drive off of F.M. 1938 (Davis Boulevard) must be shown to serve both lots 5R1-R2 and 5R1-R1. The CAE must be at least 2 feet wider than and centered over the common driveway and provide access into both lots. It is not necessary for the CAE to provide access through all internal drives within the lots. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA 00-135 7E Page I Surrounding Property Owners Parker's Corner T Property Owner Zonine Land Use Description Acrea e 1. Lam, Conner 1. AG 1. Office Commercial 1. 2.64 2. Southlake Stonebridge Park 2. S-P-2 2. Retail Commercial 2. 3.70 3. Southlake Stonebridge Park 3. S-P-2 3. Retail Commercial 3. 0.94 4. Kwik Kar Lube & Tune 4. S-P-1 4. Retail Commercial 4. 0.51 5. Wendy's International. Inc. 5. C-2 5. Retail Commercial 5. 0.72 6. Southlake JV 6. C-2 6. Retail Commercial 6. 1.10 7. Venus Partners III 7. C-3 7. Retail Commercial 7. 2.56 8. Collins, Ottis F 8. S-P-1 8. Mixed Use 8. 3.63 9. Sheehey, F Rosetta 9. SF-20A 9. Mixed Use 9. 0.39 10. Sheehey, F Rosetta 10. AG 10. Mixed Use 10. 1.24 11. Mantheiy, Joseph Etux Pegg; 11. RE 11. Low Density Residential 11. 5.00 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-135 7E Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Lots 5R1-RI, 5R1-R2, & 5R2-R1, Parker's Corner NOTICES SENT: 6 RESPONSES: One response was received from within the 200' notification area: • Roy Mendez, 2335 6V Southlake Blvd., Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received February 1, 2001.) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-135 7E Page 1 City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 16, 2001 CASE NO: ZA00-134 PROJECT: Sonic Drive -In REQUEST: Mike F. Twichell, L.P., is requesting site plan approval for Sonic Drive -In. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing. 2. Consider Site Plan. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Developer Comments (F) Surrounding Property Owner Map (G) Neighboring Property Owner Letters r (H) Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (481-2046) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-134 7F Im BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Encore Realty Company, Inc. APPLICANT: Mike F. Twichell, L.P. PROPERTY SITUATION: On the west side of Davis Boulevard (F.M. 1938) approximately 350' south of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 5R1, Parker's Corner; and portions of Tracts 2A3 and 7A, Jessie G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18; and being 1.58 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and 100 Year Flood Plain CURRENT ZONING: TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: WATER AND SEWER: ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: "AG" Agricultural District and "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District See Concept Plan Memo for Parker's Corner-ZA00-133 See Concept Plan Memo for Parker's Corner-ZA00-133 Water $7,578 Wastewater $3,598 Roadway $1,213 * Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of Building Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. P&Z ACTION: February 8, 2001; Approved (5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 31, 2001, allowing the variances for the pitched roof and allowing the applicant to use exposed structural support columns in lieu of masonry material. P&Z SPEAKERS: STAFF COMMENTS: Case No. ZA00-134 None. Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 31, 2001. The applicant is requesting the following variances: • All buildings under 6,000 square feet must have pitched roofs as defined in Ordinance 480, Section 43.12 (Variance requested per Section 43.9.b) Agenda Item 7F Attachment A Page 2 • Exposed structural support columns shall be constructed of, or clad in the same masonry material as the principle structure -Ordinance 480 Section 43.9.1 (e). (Variance requested per Section 43.9.b) Bathrooms to serve the public are provided. NACommunity Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00- I 34SP.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-134 7F Page 2 Vicinity Map Sonic Drive In a a J � E � r CARR PR� HIGI SCHC I i �IT P - �PONS i 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet W Case No. ZA00-134 191 S Agenda Item 7F E Attachment B Page 1 L, CI!illlllll i! • e i:b � � � >I � IY q� pmQ � ■y� 3g@ �T— RL�°- � VI Y 1yJ, -J -mew %w,r�f/,ra Qfs► aN A H 0 1 H rr�� aarA31llo s1Ard', .- No. ...h® AAA�r nda XItem -134 7F i 4 c: 9 Q' s a I J Ca�e No. Agenda Item Attachment C ZA00-134 7F Page 2 MITH Case No. ZA00-134 Q III 4 SO N Agenda Item 7F e O� j N Attachment C Page 3 � tJill p i! i r Cas4 No. Agenda Item ZA00-134 7F Attache neht C Page 4 Jilli Willi 1 MIN# rem Case No. ZA00-134 v w nC l W Z 4E i 0 d I �4 CC ! c ; Z11 °z1 N T Agenda Item Attachment C 7F Page 5 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-134 ect Name: Site Plan - Sonic Drive -In APPLICANT: Drews Realty Group 580 Commerce Street Suite 400 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: 817-251-2258 Fax: 817-416-8418 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 1/31/00 ARCHITECT: Bury Partner-DFW, Inc. Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75024 Phone: 972-991-0011 Fax: 972-991-0278 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/22/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT KEN BAKER AT (817) 481-2046. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comments No. 2 & 3 Residential Adjacency Y See Comments No. 2 &3 Building Articulation Y Complies Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Reviewed as part of the Concept Plan Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y Reviewed as part of the Concept Plan Lighting Y See Informational Comments Bufferyards and drives reviewed in conjunction with the Concept Plan. 2. All buildings under 6,000 square feet must have pitched roofs as defined in Ordinance 480, Section 43.12 (Variance requested per Section 43.9.b-See Attachment E, Page #3-Variance #4) 3. Exposed structural support columns shall be constructed of, or clad in the same masonry material as the principle structure -Ordinance 480 Section 43.9.1 (e). (Variance requested per Section 43.9.b-See Attachment E, Page #3-Variance #3) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-134 7F Page 1 4. Approval of this site plan is subject to approval of an appropriate change of zoning. A zoning change request for "S-P-2" with "C-2" uses(Case ZA00-133) is pending. INFORIyIATIONAL COMMENTS P&Z ACTION: February 8, 2001; Approved (5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 31, 2001, allowing the variances for the pitched roof and allowing the applicant to use exposed structural support columns in lieu of masonry material. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the west must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off -site pavement and a permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1938. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * This proposal shall adhere to all the regulations of the Lighting Ordinance. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Bufferyard Calculation Chart, Interior Landscape Summary Chart, Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTIWP-FILES\REV\2000\00-I34SP-SONIC DRIVE IN.DOC Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-134 7F Page 2 ?fanning an� Zoning Dept. 1711 �. Sou:hlaxe Boulevard, Suite 100 76092 RE : CITY CASE # ZA-00-134 Sonic Drive-in Davis Blvd. Sout-hlake, Texas s _e?� _5 request: for variances on the above referenced nrr,�Ject. ';AR __ - D7STANCE BETWEEN DRIV-WAYS: T''e center cf the proposed driveway is 431 feet from the center of the I-earest drive located to the north, which is less than the required 500 feet. The center of the proposed drive is located at the southeast -per`y. Therefore, 431 feet is _^e -maximum distance that ca-. e :etween the two drives and provide an access drive to -e orocer . M:CHAEL F. TWiCHELL. INC. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-134 7F Page 1 CITY CASE 4ZA-00-134 PAGE #2 VARIANCE =2 - STACKING SPACE AT DRIVEWAY: The site clan provides for a 40 foot stacking depth at the drive, which is less than the required 75 foot stacking depth. As shown on the site plan, t1ae ::0 year flood plan has caused the building to be located on t:-e east of the property. This has resu'_ted in the shortening of he usable eas= to west depth of the site. This has created a shallow front yard and front drive resulting in the 40 foot stacking depth. VARIANCE #3 - COLUMNS SUPPORTING CANOPY The building will not be supported nor express any columns; however, the canopy over the parking spaces will be supported by tube steel columns spaced at "-0" and located at the side of each parking space. The intent of she design is to wrap the columns at the ends of the canopies with masonry, as shown on the exterior elevations. This will include the columns facing Davis Blvd. on the east side of the property. The masonry wrapping the columns will match the stone veneer on the building. The intermediate columns will be painted to match the color of the building's E.F.I.S material. We are requesting that the intermediate canopy columns be painted, in lieu of being wrapped in masonry for the following reasons. 1. As seen from Davis Blvd., the masonry wrapped columns at the ends of the canopies will create a uniform masonry appearance tat matches building masonry. 2. columns are spaced at 11'-0". I_n the past smaller in_ermediate steel columns have proven not to be obtrusive or no_iceable. We are concerned that wrapping all the intermediate columns in masonry would make the canopy structure appear too massive creating a forest of large masonry columns. 3. The intermediate steel columns would be painted to match the b�-lding and canopy; therefore, the smaller columns would be less noticeable than the masonry wrapped columns. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-134 7F Page 2 CITY CASE #ZA-00-134 PAGE 43 VARIANCE 44 - PITCHED ROOFS: Buildings smaller than 6,000 square feet in floor space are required to have a w -ched roof. The intent of the design is to meet the appearance of a pitc.`:ed roof by pitching the canopy roofs that surround the majority cf the building. Small restaurants buildings with their RCOF TOP mechanical systems do create conditions that make it difficult to provide a pitched roof over the building. We are asking to pitch the canopy roof in lieu of pitching the building roof for the following reasons. 1. Like all restaurants the kitchen will require roof top units and exhaust fans. The parapets have been designed to consell :e roof top equipment from view. A fully pitched roof would not provide for screening of the roof top equipment. 2. --'-e building is 21'-10" wide. The building is not wide enough create a pitched roof along the perimeter walls and provide a lower flat roof top mechanical area at the center of the building. 3. Having the canopies pitched roof in front of the building's pitched roof would create two pitched rooflines on the building facade. We think two pitched roofs would appear too complex and cluttered. 4. The canopy is an intricate part of the function and appearance the building. The intent of the canopies pitched roof design. to enhance the building while meeting the pitched roof _=z-::irement . Sincerely, 00.000" .711 �w Terry S. Clark Michael F. Twichell, L. P. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-134 7F Page 3 Surrounding Property Owners Sonic Drive In 1 Property Owner Zonine Land Use Descriation Acreaee 1. Lam, Conner 1. AG 1. Office Commercial 1. 2.64 2. Dkv Partners I Lp 2. C-2 2. Retail Commercial 2. 0.66 3. Kwik Kar Lube & Tune 3. S-P-1 3. Retail Commercial 3. 0.51 4. Wendy's International, Inc. 4. C-2 4. Retail Commercial 4. 0.72 5. Southlake JV 5. C-2 5. Retail Commercial 5. 1.10 6. Venus Partners 111 6. C-3 6. Retail Commercial 6. 2.56 7. Collins, Ottis F 7. S-P-1 7. Mixed Use 7. 3.63 8. Sheehey, F Rosetta 8. SF-20A 8. Mixed Use 8. 0.39 9. Sheehey, F Rosetta 9. AG 9. Mixed Use 9. 1.24 10. Mantheiy, Joseph Etux Pegg: 10. RE 10. Low Density Residential 10. 5.00 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-134 7F Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Sonic Drive -In NOTICES SENT: 12 RESPONSES: One response was received from within the 200' notification area: • Roy Mendez, 2334 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received February 1, 2001). Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-134 7F Page 1 L City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 16, 2001 CASE NO: ZA00-085 PROJECT: The Lakes on Dove (formerly Emerald Estates South) REQUEST: On behalf of Frank S. Shelby, Allegheny Land Company is requesting approval of a preliminary plat. ACTION NEEDED: Consider preliminary plat ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Plat Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner Letters (G) Blue Line Copies of Plan (for P&Z and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073) Case No. ZA00-085 Agenda Item 8A OWNER: APPLICANT: PROPERTY SITUATION HISTORY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND USE CATEGORY CURRENT ZONIti'G: TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Frank S. Shelby Allegheny Land Company Located on the north side of East Dove Street approximately 120' east of North Carroll Avenue. The Final Plat of Emerald Estates South was approved in April of 1984 Lot 2, Block 1, Emerald Estates South. Medium Density Residential "AG" Agricultural District Thoroughfare Plan The Thoroughfare Plan recommends that East Dove Street be a five (5) lane undivided arterial with 94' of R.O.W. The applicant is proposing to dedicate 5' feet of R.O.W. which will result in 47from centerline. Existing Area Road Network East Dove Street - the properties will access directly onto East Dove Street. East Dove Street is currently a two (2) lane undivided east -west roadway with 50' of R.O.W. The current traffic counts on East Dove Street: 24hr West Bound (WB) (2,314 East Bound (EB) (2,290 WB Peak A.M. 176 7a.m-8a.m. Peak P.M. 307 5 .m.-6 .m. EB Peak A.M. 290 7a.m-8a.m Peak P.M. 215 5 .m.-6 .m Traffic Impact Approval of this project will generate 70 vehicle trips per day directly onto East Dove Street. East Dove Street is currently operating at a level of service (L.O.S) C during peak traffic times. DRAINAGE: The preliminary drainage plans indicate the calculations for the predevelopment runoff and the post development runoff and the difference between the two. The proposed ponds as shown on the preliminary drainage plan are sized to handle the increased runoff. The developer is required by ordinance to detain the increased runoff if downstream conditions won't Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-085 8A Paget handle the increased runoff. The plans do not show how the ponds will be discharged. Staff has recommended that the discharge from the ponds be split if possible between Dove Street and the 50' drainage and utility easement along the rear of Emerald Estates. Once final drainage plans are submitted, staff may also recommend improvements be made to the Dove Street right-of-way ditch to accommodate this runoff. WATER AND SEWER: The applicant is proposing service connections for Lots 1-4 to an existing 8" sanitary sewer line along the north boundary of these lots. An aerobic irrigation septic system is proposed for Lots 5-7. An 8" water line exists along E. Dove Street. ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: Water S 13,010.48 (Assumes 7-1 "meters) Wastewater $ 8,107.68 Assumes 7-l" meters Roadway $10,049.69 (Roadway Service Area 2) * Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of Building Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. P&Z ACTION: November 9, 2000; Approved (4-0) the applicant's request to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the December 7, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. December 7, 2000; Approved (7-0) the applicant's request to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the January 18, 2001, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. P&Z SPEAKERS: STAFF COMMENTS: January 18, 2001; Approved (6-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the February 8, 2001, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting due to incomplete submission of required materials. February 8, 2001; Approved (6-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 6, dated February 1, 2001, allowing the variance to the right-of-way dedication allowing the pedestrian access easement in lieu of the right-of-way dedication. In Favor Qualified In Favor I Opposed Other Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 7, dated February 16, 2000. The following variances are being requested by the applicant: Variance to right-of-way for E. Dove Street in compliance with the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan, Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-085 8A Page3 5.02D, in lieu of providing a 6' pedestrian access easement. (See applicant letter). This plan reduces the number of lots proposed on the previous plan from 12 lots to 7 lots. Three detention ponds have been added to the site in order to reduce storm water run-off. City Council Motion for the Zoning and Concept Plan approval: February 6, 2001; Approved (7-0) Second Reading subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 7, dated February 2, 2001, with the consent of the applicant for "SF -IA" zoning; limited to seven lots; full engineering and construction plans to be provided with Final Plat submission; developer agrees to not use the Drainage and Utility Easement within Emerald Estates; agrees to fence the detention ponds and aerate if the pond or ponds become filled. NACommunity Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-085PP. doe Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-085 8A Page4 IN h-��\ K10Wt Vicinity Map Emerald Estates South 111 MCOEE _-_ - _ _- - - PMV+YP —60 ElFl4MiMY Case No. ZA00-085 2000 0 2000 4000 Feet W R S Agenda Item 8A E Attachment B Page 1 l O o Z 9 i N v` 1 dj]8 _, ra.m roar w+a lit ,'t Hr C a�. i12z"'�mz�aai��a?assr.�ir�szs�6..r� 3AOQ1`i0 S"3Ytl'I iII1.L 0 Q',J� .LV'Id ATIVNIWPIfRId �'k qq aat�na�ar♦a.aaa��aa�a�aa � � L R � � aaauc � awaa� • mt w �a� eaaaaw� a aatM +� i y > BTlll�lW8-' W S'V}iI.L':I:{V"ILi.1(1US • auuileNo7ewvab ANV.iWa�J(IW"1:{N"tIH')il'1"IV IeYA+ € �s!!Yi o �6B'I(S ur- 31A ,0� .ZO 5 � 9 3 Z W o] - F n I a u w i k5----- _ l 3 o 311 ';ill e pp 88 d N q I. •Y�. vnm a+aae � ° r a SWUM- - =f — ---_ DES �`� ------------ Wnay ., 1-�' a a n 2 °p �°igi Ygi 7� �'°•o� �9e i ii ,I WiO ; 3 ot' Nb C'wi ram. II�J� --------------- ------------- Attachmei Pa A Case No.: ZA00-085 PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Review No.: Seven ect Name: Preliminary Plat — Emerald Estates South APPLICANT: Allegheny Land Co. 17480 Dallas Parkway Ste. 110 Dallas, TX 75287 Phone: 972-248-8155 Fax: 972-248-8171 Date of Review: 2/16/01 ENGINEER: Adams Consulting Engineers, Inc. 2445 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: 817-329-6990 Fax: 817-329-7671 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/12/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, 787. Provide dedication of right-of-way for E. Dove Street in compliance with the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. (Variance requested to required R.O. W. dedication (Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.02D) under the provisions of Ord. 483, Section 9.01A, in lieu of providing a 6' pedestrian access easement.). 2. Show and label a 40' Building setback line along Dove Street. 3. Provide the following notes on the plan that shall also be included on subsequent plats: "Driveway access to Lots 1 -6, Block 1, shall be through Common Access Easements as shown." "Driveways on lots which will be directly accessing Dove Street must designed and constructed in a manner that permits adequate off-street maneuvering areas and must be approved by the Director of Public Works to ensure that vehicles will not back into the public street." Case No. ZA00-085 Agenda Item 8A Attachment D Page 1 Informational Comments * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment cc: Art Clayton VIA FAX: (817) 424-0884 (phone: 817-329-1092) N:\Community Development, WP-FII.ES\REV\2000\00-084CP5.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-085 8A Page 2 Case No. 00-085 Review No. Four Dated: 10 — 12 - 00 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Dove Road Estates (Preliminary Plat) Contact: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 481-5581, x 848 Fax: (817) 421-2175 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 10 - 02 - 00 . Comments designated with a (#) symbol may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: See attached Tree Preservation Analysis. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-085 Page 3 TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Residential Subdivision Development) Case: 00-085 Date of Review: 10 — 12 - 00 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Dove Road Estates (Preliminary Plat) Review #4 OWNER \ DEVELOPER Allegheny Land Company 17480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 110 Dallas, TX 75287 Phone: ((72) 248-8155 Fax: PREPARED BY: Adams Consulting Engineerinrs, Inc. 2445 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 329-6990 Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817) 481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The majority of trees on the property are made up of American Elm, Hackberry, Ash and Mesquite. The larger and most dominant trees are located in the south portion of the property along the R.O.W. of East Dove Road. The applicant originally proposed the sewer line to be placed in the utility easement on the North side of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13. Since East Dove Road will be widened in the future, City Staff suggested that the sewer line be placed along the North R.O.W. of East Dove Road. The trees along the North R.O.W. will need to be removed for the installation of the sewer line as well as the widening of Dove Road. 2. All Construction. Plans submitted for the development of the subdivision shall include the requirements listed in Appendix `C', of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. This will be required especially where utility installation is adjacent to adjoining properties with existing trees. * Residential Subdivision Development: In a residential subdivision, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or utility easements or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to achieve the cut/fill drainage as designated on the master drainage construction plan, shall be exempt from the tree replacement and tree protection requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of thi Tree Preservation Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of the Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the subdivision shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of the Ordinance. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-085 $A Page 4 * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of this lot. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-085 $A Page 5 Surrounding Property Owners Emerald Estates South Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-085 8A Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Emerald Estates South Propertv Owner Zoniaz Land Use Description Acreaee 1. Carroll ISD I. "CS" 1. Public/Semi-Public I. 14.02 acres 2. M. Milo 2. "SF -IA" 2. Low Density Residential 2. 1.08 acres 3. B. Cotton 3. "SF -IA" 3. Low Density Residential 3. 1.28 acres 4. G. Gist 4. "0-1" 4. Medium Density Residential 4. 1.14 acres 5. B. Burford 5. "SF -IA" 5. Low Density Residential 5. 1.13 acres 6. J. Radaford 6. "SF -IA" 6. Low Density Residential 6. 1.34 acres 7. C. Wells 7. "SF -IA" 7. Low Density Residential 7. 1.16 acres 8. R. Roger 8. "SF -IA" 8. Low Density Residential 8. 1.35 acres 9. F. Budzowski 9. "SF -IA" 9. Low Density Residential 9. 1.14 acres 10. D. Browning 10. "SF -IA" 10. Low Density Residential 10. 1.02 acres 11. R. Butler 11. "SF -IA" 11. Low Density Residential 11. 1.16 acres 12. C. McKean 12. "SF -IA" 12. Low Density Residential 12. 1.07 acres 13. K. Mason 13. "SF -IA" 13. Low Density Residential 13. 1.09 acres 14. G. Smith 14. "SF -IA" 14. Low Density Residential 14. 1.04 acres 15. R. Schneider 15. "SF -IA" 15. Low Density Residential 15. 1.05 acres 16. M. Molina 16. "AG" 16. Low Density Residential/ 16. 2.26 acres Medium Density Residential 17. E. Higgins 17. "SF -IA" 17. Low Density Residential 17. 2.26 acres 18. J. Gentry 18. "SF -IA" 18. Low Density Residential 18. 1.00 acres 19. B. Stiborek 19. "AG" 19. Low Density Residential 19. 0.93 acres 20. T. Johnson 20. "AG" 20. Low Density Residential 20. 1.00 acres 21. J. Davis 21. "AG" 21. Low Density Residential 21. 1.00 acres 22. D. Stapleton 22. "AG" 22. Low Density Residential 22. 1.50 acres 23. M. White 23. "AG" 22. Low Density Residential 23. 1.00 acres 24. F. Shelby 24. "AG" 24. Low Density Residential 24. 3.95 acres 25. J. Johnson 25. "AG" 25. Low Density Residential 25. 1.08 acres 26. N. Bhogavalli 26. "AG" 26. Low Density Residential 26. 4.77 acres 27. M. Wilson 27. "C-2" 27. Medium Density Residential 27. 4.18 acres Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-085 8A Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Emerald Estates South NO. OF NOTICES SENT: Twenty-nine (29) RESPONSES RECEIVED: Four (4) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • D.L. Kirkland, Castillian Condos, 526D, Grand Prairie, TX, no opinion, "I no longer own this property." (Received November 6, 2000.) • Gary S. Smith, 1391 Emerald Circle, Southlake, TX, opposed, "1.) There is a natural drainage channel that will be disrupted and could damage my property in the event of heavy rain. 2.) The location of the middle school will increase traffic on what essentially is a country road." (Received November 6, 2000.) • Ben J. Stiborek, 1407 East Dove Road, Southlake, TX, undecided, "If Dove Rd. is widened in the future to possibly 4 lanes, what side of Dove Rd. will the expansion be from? Those of us on the south side of Dove Rd. would have our frontage reduced and a loss of property valuation. I think this should be considered before this property is approved for development." (Received November 9, 2000.) • Mario and Angie Molina, 1481 East Dove Road, Southlake, TX, opposed, "Not 1 acre lots or above plus drainage problems." (Received November 9, 2000.) One (1) response was received from outside the 200' notification area: • W.P. Hogue, 1507 East Dove Road, Southlake, TX, opposed, "When we received permit in our area lots were 1 acre plus, in this new zoning lots are not." (Received November 9, 2000.) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment F ZA00-085 8A Page I n City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 16, 2001 CASE NO: ZA00-140 PROJECT: Proposed Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block A, Cornerstone Plaza REQUEST: Par-3 Properties, L.L.C., is requesting approval of a Rezoning and Concept Plan. ACTION NEEDED: Consider rezoning and concept plan request. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Concept Plan Review Summary (E) Developer Comments (F) Surrounding Property Owner Map (G) Surrounding Property Owner Letters (H) Ordinance No. 480-357 (1) Blue line copies of plans (for P&Z and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-140 813 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Par-3 Properties, L.L.C. APPLICANT: Par-3 Properties, L.L.C. PROPERTY SITUATION: On the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) being across from North Nolen Drive and Gateway Plaza. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 2, 2A1, 2AIA, 2AIB, 2C, and a portion of Tract 2A2A, Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474; Lot 2R2, Block 5, Cornerstone Business Park; and a portion of Crooked Lane right-of-way; and being 9.5543 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial; 75 LDN Overlay Corridor CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "0-1" Office District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses. TRANSPORTATION: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommend Southlake Boulevard to have 130' of right-of-way and Nolen Drive to be an undivided four (4) lane arterial with 70' of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for both these roads. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have two (2) accesses directly on to Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and one (1) access onto S. Nolen Drive. Crooked Drive will eventually be abandoned. Nolen Drive- is a north/south four lane divided roadway that will terminate into Crooked Lane. Nolen Drive will be extended to the north and interesect Southlake Boulevard continuing north to the frontage road of S.H. 114. E. Southlake Boulevard -is a five lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two-way, center left turn lane. The roadway will utilimately be widen to a seven lane roadway. Crooked Lane -is a two lane undivided roadway . The segment northeast of the existing portion of Nolen Drive will be abandoned Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-140 8B Page 1 May, 2000 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 (between S.H. 114 & Kimball Avenue): Table #1 24hr West Bound (WB) (22,288) East Bound (EB) (21,042) WB Peak A.M. (1,313) 1 .m-2 m. Peak P.M. 2,280) 5 .m.-6 p.m. EB Peak A.M. (1,930) 7a.m-8a.m Peak P.M. (1,315) 5p.m.-6m May, 2000 traffic counts on Crooked Lane (between F.M. 1709 & Kimball Avenue)• Table #1 24hr North Bound NB 1,515) South Bound (SB) (1,297 NB Peak A.M. 200 8 a.m-9 a.m. Peak P.M. (124) 6 .m.-7 p.m. SB Peak A.M. 84 8a.m-9a.m Peak P.M. 158) 5 .m.-6 .m Traffic Impact Use Sq. Ft. Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT 1 PM- IN ; PM - OUT Lot 1 -Shopping Cent. 14,490 622 9 6 26 28 Lot 2-Shopping Cent. 21,650 929 13 9 39 42 Lot2-Quality Rest. 10,000 900 4 4 50 25 j Lot 3-Shopping Cent. 15,000 644 9 6 27 29 j Lot3-Qualit Rest. 11,400 ( 1,025 5 4 57 j 28 Total 1 72,540 4,120 40 29 199 152 *Vehicle Trips Per Day *The AM,/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on Southlake Boulevard. Southlake Boulevard near Crooked Lane carries approximately 43,000 vehicle trips per day with the peak traffic times occurring between 7a.m. and 8 a.m. and 5p.m. and 6p.m. The site will generate 69 vehicle trips during the A.M. rush hour and 351 vehicle trips during the P.M. rush hour. However, it should be noted that that a large percentage of the trips generated by this use will be pass by trips. No reduction has been made to account for these by trips. DRAINAGE: The developer has indicated that the existing drainage channel running north and south through the site will remain in a natural state. A channel analysis has been submitted showing the existing creek and areas of inundation caused by the 100-year storm. The proposed drainage easement is shown approximately 5 feet outside of this inundated area. WATER AND SEWER: Site will connect water services to the existing 12" water line along the south side of Southlake Boulevard. An 8" sewer extension is proposed from the north side of Southlake Boulevard. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-140 813 Page 2 ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: Water S35,685.89 (assumes 6 - 2" simple meters) Wastewater I S22,238.21 (assumes 6 - 2" simple meters) Roadway S60,339.65 (assumes sit down Rest. & Shopping Center) * Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of Building Permit Issuance. The fees shown above represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. P&Z ACTION: February 8, 2001; Approved (5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 2, 2001, allowing variances to item #3 (driveways encroaching in buffer -yard), #4 (driveway spacing and stacking), and recommending approval of the proposed regulations and uses. P&Z SPEAKERS: In Favor Qualified In Favor Opposed Other � l I STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated February 2, 2001. Under the "S-P-2" site plan district zoning the applicant proposes the following: • Max. overall impervious coverage of 76% with a max. per lot of 78.5%. Ordinance 480, Sect. 22.5k allows a max. per lot of 75%. • No bufferyards required along lot lines internal to the development. Ordinance 480, Section 42.3 Requires bufferyards along the outer perimeter of all lot or boundary lines. • The applicant also proposes deletion of some "C-3" district uses as noted in Attachment E, Page 1. Variances are requested for the following: • Bufferyard encroachment under provisions of Ordinance 480, Section 42.15. • Driveway Stacking Depth and Spacing under provision of Ordinance 634, Section 8. N:`•.Community Development`WP-F1LES`,a1EMO`2000cases\00-140ZC.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-140 8B Page 3 Vicinity Map Cornerstone Plaza NORTHWEST PKWY EAST - --- _ PDUL1IpN ., O i-q AL �0A Q Q 1� .ORNERSTONE_ - s ---- ---- -- BU Is NE -- COMM-ERCE _BUSINESS — Z a -- — iA — - PARK—i Case No. ZA00-140 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet N S Agenda Item 8B E Attachment B Page 1 Case No. ZAOO-140 HIKN NORTH jIl j8 L 3: ^0 J 4e; �/ I L) 01- 7" NZ 3 Icz" 4r 2:2. ;7 I Agenda Item 8B �ZQa LLJ 0 izyFo z o w -um Z 0 03 Z LL, cc 0 q 0M0 NV'd-1d]'N0' 2 ment C Page I Case No.: ZA00-140 ect Name: C APPLICANT: CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Review No.: Two Plan - Cornerstone Plaza Par 3 Properties 2810 Market Loop Ste. 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone : (817) 999-5336 Fax : (817) 416-0024 — Attn: Max Krugler Page I of 3 Date of Review: 02/02/01 SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: JDJR 2505 Texas Drive, Ste. 109 Irving Texas 75062 Phone : (972) 252-5357 Fax :(972)273-8860 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/22/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 1. The applicant proposed a maximum impervious coverage for the overall development is 76% with a maximum of 78.5% on a per lot basis. The applicant proposes no bufferyards along lot lines internal to the development. Bufferyards shall be located within and along the outer perimeter of a lot or boundary line. BUFFERYARD & LANDSCAPE Pavements and internal driveways cannot encroach into a bufferyard. The driveway and parking located in the north part of Lot 1 and 2 is encroaching the 20' Type `O' bufferyard adjacent to Southlake Boulevard. (Variance Requested) Parking lot landscape islands must be a minimum of 12' wide and equal in depth to the parking stall. Also insure that 50% of all building floor area is allocated for interior landscape within each lot. 75% of the required area must be at the front and sides of the building. It appears that the requirement should be attainable. However, preliminary measurements show that some islands may be too small to count towards credit. In some areas the applicant may desire to combine parking islands to create a larger planting area and address tree preservation where site grading is not a factor. Please make sure the parking lot landscape area requirements are met on future site plans. Case No. ZA00-140 Agenda Item Attachment D Page 1 8B Page 2 of 3 DRIVEWAYS 4. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways: a. A minimum of 500' of spacing is required between a driveway centerline and an intersection along Southlake Boulevard. Driveway B is approximately 437' from the intersection of S. Nolen Drive. (Variance Requested) b. A minimum of 500' is required between full access driveways intersecting Southlake Boulevard. There is approximately 354' between Drives B and C. (Variance Requested) A minimum of 100' of driveway stacking depth is required. Driveway A has approximately 75' of stacking depth. (Variance Requested) GENERAL COMMENTS Clearly show the drainage easement on the south side of lot 3. No pavements or structures may impede flow of storm water in the drainage easement. Encroachment on the drainage easement by any structure must be approved by the City Engineer. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * This review is based on the "C-3" Zoning District Regulations. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a revised preliminary plat followed by a plat revision or partial plat vacation and final plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records. An abandonment ordinance for Crooked Lane will also be require. A site plan for each building site must be processed and approved. A fully corrected site plan, landscape, irrigation and building plans must be submitted to the building department and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. An Abandonment Ordinance and Quit Claim must be approved and filed of record in the County Deed Records prior to filing a Final Plat on this property. All issues regarding Crooked Lane abandonment should be resolved prior to submission of Site Plans or Final Plats on this property. It is strongly recommended that approval of the Abandonment Ordinance be received prior to submission of any of these applications. This site fall within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by Ordinance 480-CC, Section 43, Part III "Residential Adjacency Standards" as well as the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations in Section 43, Part II. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan, the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Case No. ZA00-140 Agenda Item Attachment D Page 2 8B Page 3 of 3 Zoning Commission and the City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements: Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended. Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended. Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d, Ordinance 480, as amended. Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as amended. Spill -over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended. Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended. Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544. Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-140 8B Page 3 Case No. 00-140 Review No. One Dated: 12 — 28 - 00 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Cornerstone Plaza (Rezoning -Concept Plan) Contact: Keith Martin, Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 481-5581, x 848 Fax: (817) 421-2175 The following comments are based on the review of' plans received on 12 - 18 - 00 . Comments designated with a (#) symbol may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by eithe the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or Citv Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. SITE PLAN / LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: Please correct the required North bufferyard to reflect a 20'-0 type bufferyard as required by the Corridor Overlay, and Section 42 Bufferyards of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIREMENTS: The parking lot landscape area requirements shall be as follows based on the percentage of parking located between the building facade and the R.O.W.. Less than 25% = 15 sq. ft. per parking stall 25% - 75% = 20 sq. ft. per parking stall Greater than 75% = 30 sq. ft. per parking stall Each row of parking stalls shall provide the required landscape area; however, it shall be the applicant's right to place the islands near the buildings, throughout the parking, or at the end of the rows away from the building. The Landscape Administrator may modify the island requirement for each row in situations where it would appear beneficial to combine an awkward or hazardous island into a larger island within the parking area. Planter islands shall have a minimum width of 12' back-to-back if curbed or 13' edge -to -edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. Parking lot landscape areas do count towards the total required interior landscape area. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: * Please see attached Tree Preservation .Analysis. Case No. ZAOO-140 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Agenda Item as Attachment D Page 4 Case:00-140 TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non -Residential Development) Date of Review: 12 — 28 - 00 Project Name: Cornerstone Plaza (Rezoning / Concept Plan) OWNER \ DEVELOPER Par-3 Properties, LLC (Max Krugler) 2810 Market Loop. Suite 100 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 329-1635 Fax: Number of Pages: 1 PREPARED BY: JDJR Engineers and Consultants, Inc. 2506 Texas Drive, Suite 109 Irving, TX 75062 Phone: (972) 252-5367 Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481- 5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. A Tree Survey was not submitted with the Concept Plan submittal. An aerial photograph was submitted that meets the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. After discussing the requirements with the applicant, he has agreed to submit a Tree Survey of the perimeter areas and interior drainage area and green space when or if a Site Plan is submitted. 2. The most crucial areas of tree preservation on the development site will be within the perimeter landscape and bufferyard areas, and within the drainage easement area between lots 2 and 3. Since mass grading will need to occur on the interior of the site it would be extremely difficult to preserve existing trees within that area. Since an engineered Grading Plan has not been submitted, any possible mitigation cannot be determined at this time. * Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of the Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of the Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. BUILDING INSPECTIONS Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-140 S� Page 5 2M CORNERSTONE PLAZA USE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR "S -P-2" ZONING PERMITTED USES This site shall permit all "C -3" General Commercial District uses according to Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 22, with the exception of the following d eleted uses: 1. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas; 2. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto; 3. Lodges, sororities and / or fraternities; 4. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: This property shall be subject to the development regulations of the "C -3" General Commercial District, Section 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, and all other applicable regulations of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, with the following exceptions: 1. Maximum impervious coverage required: 76%; Provided: 78.5% on a per lot basis, provided the overall site does not exceed 76%; 2. Bufferyards along lot lines internal to the development shall not be required. Case No. ZA00-140 Agenda Item 8$ Attachment E Page 1 January 18, 2001 City of Southlake c: Planning Department 1400 Main Street =- Southlake, Texas 76092 Attention: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner Re: ZA00-140 — Concept Plan Variance Request — Bufferyard encroachment Mr. Killough: We respectfully request a variance for an encroachment into the required type " O" bufferyard (20 foot minimum) along Southlake Boulevard. This variance is requested due the irregular corfiguration of the right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard in the area of the encroachment. This irregular configuration results in surplus parkway along Southlake Boulevard. There is an average of 60 feet of surplus parkway along this frontage resulting in an "effective" bufferyard (including the requested encroachment) of at least 70 feet. Sincerely, /a.Krugler Par-3 Properties, LLC Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-140 $Q Page 2 January 18, 2001 v J ti City of Southlake Planning Department 1400 Main Street Southlake, Texas 76092 Attention: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner �- Re: ZAOO-140 — Concept Plan Variance Request — Driveway spacing Mr. Killough: We respectfully request two variances to the driveway spacing requirements of the driveway ordinance. The variance requests are as follows: I . A 63 foot (approximately) variance to the required 500 foot spacing between the centerline of Driveway B and the intersection of the proposed South Nolen Drive extension, This variance request is made so the proposed Driveway B aligns with a proposed driveway on the north side of Southlake Boulevard. 2. A 146 foot (approximately) variance to the required 500 foot spacing between Driveway B and Driveway C. This variance request is made so both proposed Driveway B and Driveway C aligns with a proposed driveways on the north side of Southlake Boulevard. Sincerely, 1 / Max Krug r Par-3 Properties, LLC Case No. ZA00-140 Agenda Item 8B Attachment E Page 3 January 125. 2001 City of Scu.hlake Planning Ce-Dartment 1400 Main Street Southlake. -exas 76092 Attention: Bennis Killough, Senior Planner Re: Zr:00-140 — Concept Plan Va^ante Request — Driveway stacking Mr. Killouc We respe:. Jly request a variance to the driveway stacking requirements in the driveway ordinance. We request that the minimum stacking distance for Driveway A be 75 feet instead of the rewired 100 foot minimum. The requested variance is mitigated by the additional ingress stac:<ing depth provided by the approved left turn lane to be constructed in South Nolen Dr,.e. Sincerely. Max Kruglt�-r Par-3 Prcpe7ies, LLC Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-140 913 Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners Cornerstone Plaza Propertv Owner Zonin Land Use Description Acrea e 1. Hong, Chung-Cheng Etux A 1. S-P-2 1. Mixed Use 1. 3 2. Harrell, Glen Scott Etal 2. S-P-2 2. Mixed Use 2. 4.86 3. Perry, Donald Etux Martha 3. S-P-2 3. Mixed Use 3. 99 4. Woodside, Gregory P Etux L 4. S-P-2 4. Mixed Use 4. 1. .61 5. State of Texas 5. 5. 5. 24 1.08 6. Wyndham Properties Ltd 6. S-P-2 6. Mixed Use 6. 3 7. Caddy Property Managemen 7. S-P-2 7. Retail Commercial 7. 1. .95 8. Shurgard/Fremont Partners 8. S-P-2 8. Industrial 8. 4.57 9. Cornerstone Business Park 9. I-1 9. Industrial 9. 1.58 10. Cornerstone Business Park 10. 0-1 10. Industrial 10. 2.57 11. Cornerstone Business Park 11. 0-1 11. Office Commercial 11. 1.56 12. White, E C Etux Zada 12. AG 12. Low Density Residential 12. 16.96 13. Williams, Roger Glenn 13. AG 13. Low Density Residential 13. 5.93 14. Shanklin, Harold D & Richai 14. AG 14. Retail Commercial 14. 6.79 Case No. ZA00-140 Agenda Item 8B Attachment F Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Cornerstone Plaza NOTICES SENT: 16 RESPONSES: Five responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Roger G. Williams, 538 Oak Hills Drive, Newark, TX, in favor. (Received February 1, 2001.) • Chung Cheng Hong, 640 107`h Street, Arlington, TX, in favor. (Received February 1, 2001.) • Dick Shanklin, 2627 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received February 2, 2001) • E. C. White, Box 465, Whiteface, TX, "very much in favor". (Received February 6, 2001) • Robert Duppstadt, 2810 Market Loop #100, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received February 6, 2001) Case No. Agenda Item Attachment G ZA00-140 8B Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-357 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE CONIPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 2, 2A1, 2A1A, 2A1B, 2C, AND A PORTION OF TRACT 2A2A, THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474; LOT 2112, BLOCK 5, CORNERSTONE BUSINESS PARK; AND A PORTION OF CROOKED LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY; AND BEING 9.5543 ACRES; AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND 110-1" OFFICE DISTRICT TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH LIMITED "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 8B Page 1 to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "O-1" Office District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 8B Page 2 throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, ,,. Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 8B Page 3 amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Tracts 2, 2A1, 2AlA, 2AlB, 2C, and a portion of Tract 2A2A, Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474; Lot 2R2, Block 5, Cornerstone Business Park; and a portion of Crooked Lane right-of-way; and being 9.5543 acres; and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District and "0-1" Office District to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with limited "C-3" General Commercial District uses as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 SB Page 4 water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 8B Page 5 zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, tine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 8B Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the MAYOR ATTEST: day of , 2001. CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 8B Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being Tracts 2, 2A1, 2AlA, 2A1B, 2C, and a portion of Tract 2A2A, Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474; Lot 2R2, Block 5, Cornerstone Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 6339, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of Crooked Lane right-of-way; and being 9.5543 acres. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 8B Page 8 A Case No. ZAOO-140 EXHIBIT "B" Agenda Item 8B 1 j. Attachment H Page 9 EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment H ZA00-140 8B Page 10 r 6M City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 16, 2001 CASE NO: ZA00-141 PROJECT: Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block A, Cornerstone Plaza REQUEST: Par-3 Properties, L.L.C., is requesting approval of a preliminary plat. ACTION NEEDED: Consider preliminary plat request. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Plat Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner Letters (G) Blue Line Copies of Plan (for P&Z and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073) Case No. Agenda Item ZA00-141 8C r BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Par-3 Properties, L.L.C. APPLICANT: Par-3 Properties, L.L.C. PROPERTY SITUATION: On the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) being across from North Nolen Drive and Gateway Plaza. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 2, 2A1, 2AIA, 2AIB, 2C, and a portion of Tract 2A2A, Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474; Lot 2R2, Block 5, Cornerstone Business Park; and a portion of Crooked Lane right-of-way; and being 9.5543 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial; 75 LDN Overlay Corridor CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "O-1" Office District TRANSPORTATION: See associated Zoning and Concept Plan Case No. ZA00-140. WATER AND SEWER: See associated Zoning and Concept Plan Case No. ZA00-140. ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES: See associated Zoning and Concept Plan Case No. ZA00-140. P&Z ACTION: February 8, 2001; Approved (5-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated February 2, 2001, subject to the applicant working out the abandonment of Crooked Lane with the City. P&Z SPEAKERS: None. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated February 2, 2001. M'Community Development'WP-FILES\iiMEM0�2000cases\00-141PP.doc Case No. Agenda Item Attachment A ZA00-141 8C Page 1 Vicinity Map Cornerstone Plaza ORTHWEST PKWY 14 2 - - SoU1�KE 01, �GORNERS©NE_ \ -- gUg--� CMMERCE FARE' BUSINESS PARK—; ; 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet W Case No. ZA00-141 01 S Agenda Item 8C IN Attachment B Page 1 o c gg 3 e P e e _ e P P ig V Es;4 Z� is Fi E: ij Za i; ig tj.6Y o C s-=SF 53 RE 88 RE n ^� 'E rE: g ,.o{ Y8 bpP s _ , 6l{ aF -e _ _ :y :; °� a pfaS"6_• xFi S'= 33t:3�3•a °:°-g= �{ fi"is fi g 5s s ex °i eE a 4=e S g"0 gPEB zs gF= £-.• a� i }!-: ? ii^i � ; 5 ;a Pq -g a; {a 'gaa ;iap f� FP: Ft n f98g}1�g:� �kJ is `'•�_ pe6 9 i ; 5€ ae AB jw =g it aea�2 Fy �'Cs ��6F � 6Siti 1 Fg $ a E- it - j it min! -ill; n{ })11h i Eb R:x Si ° : x CB E��ye[F6 6 fr ill 6 ! p aq3�• S _ E = lil I 'll, a;Esd- 193:p- d6^I{'g'6:i P. is 8R Sea p $ :P eP :l6 :8 6a a8 R8 :� 580R% gd_[gle E>st, = ^ fill ;Ei axj a ? '[l;& gs �a a " g PS is ➢a Ag gs;a f a c "F z ; F.g a �a ,B � E,jd%�:{'s:�d M�•�Z" YE _,3?f _ :t.' x6 zbf �- E= �_ __ �_ �=?iY fs i�d- :Ya"xi s- _:=: `all �• S `�� . �;�j'�,� ra;!!; I gy o 3111 I og `h '/�- \"� • ei�g J;%!`/., p p` !i \\ Case No. ZA00-141 2t x jee • t � AI� 9e BHx Agenda Item 8C N a CL Wn I 5 a a W Z F Y U D •^ ��i O Z O j ~x m j - 0 0 96v N om W u a J CC <, z �a W Z Z ua o Ja o"o O �•� o N Ti of n ay�o1 �xi9:j99 W;.9< o'iW �i'Im=jr mat==1. Attachment C Page 1 yp f 2 s aautbu3 yrpr t002 07 69 7t 6; uP '•JJ 0MG ddZ LSj\Z CSj\LSt\COOZ\fOdoFfOf\ H Page 1 of 1 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA00-141 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 02/02/01 Project Name: Preliminary Plat - Cornerstone Plaza APPLICANT: Par 3 Properties 2810 Market Loop Ste. 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone : (817) 999-5336 Fax : (817) 416-0024 — Attn: Max Krugler SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: JDJR 2505 Texas Drive, Ste. 109 Irving, Texas 75062 Phone : (972) 252-5357 Fax : (972) 273-8860 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/22/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-2073. 1. All lots must comply with zoning district regulations. Approval of this plat is subject to an appropriate change of zoning approval (currently in process). 2. Label the drainage easement between lots 2 & 3. Also, this easement must correctly intersect or join the drainage easement along the south line of lot 3. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS This property lies with the 75 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which will require construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Additionally, the Avigation Easement and Release shown in Appendix 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 must be executed on subsequent Plats to be filed in the County Plat Records. An Abandonment Ordinance and Quit Claim must be approved and filed of record in the County Deed Records prior to filing a Final Plat on this property. All issues regarding Crooked Lane abandonment should be resolved prior to submission of Site Plans or Final Plats on this property. It is strongly recommended that approval of the Abandonment Ordinance be received prior to submission of any of these applications. Case No. Agenda Item Attachment D ZA00-141 8C Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Cornerstone Plaza S cnu Property Owner Zonin2 Land Use Description Acrea e 1. Hong, Chung-Cheng Etux A 1. S-P-2 1. Mixed Use 1. 3 2. Harrell, Glen Scott Etal 2. S-P-2 2. Mixed Use 2. 4.86 3. Perry, Donald Etux Martha 3. S-P-2 3. Mixed Use 3. 2.99 4. Woodside, Gregory P Etux L 4. S-P-2 4. Mixed Use 4. 1.61 5. State of Texas 5. 5. 5. 1.24 6. Wyndham Properties Ltd 6. S-P-2 6. Mixed Use 6. 34.08 7. Caddy Property Managemen 7. S-P-2 7. Retail Commercial 7. 1.95 8. Shurgard/Fremont Partners 8. S-P-2 8. Industrial 8. 4.57 9. Cornerstone Business Park 9. I-1 9. Industrial 9. 1.58 10. Cornerstone Business Park 10. 0-1 10. Industrial 10. 2.57 11. Cornerstone Business Park 11. 0-1 11. Office Commercial 11. 1.56 12. White, E C Etux Zada 12. AG 12. Low Density Residential 12. 16.96 13. Williams, Roger Glenn 13. AG 13. Low Density Residential 13. 5.93 14. Shanklin, Harold D & Richai 14. AG 14. Retail Commercial 14. 6.79 Case No. Agenda Item Attachment E ZA00-141 8C Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block A, Cornerstone Plaza NOTICES SENT: 16 RESPONSES: Four responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Chung Cheng Hong, 640 107`h Street, Arlington, TX, in favor. (Received February 1, 2001) • Dick Shanklin, 2627 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received February 2, 2001) • E. C. White, Box 465, Whiteface, TX, "very much in favor". (Received February 6, 2001) • Robert Duppstadt, 2810 Market Loop #100, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received February 6, 2001) i NW Case No. Agenda enda Item Attachment F ZA00-141 8C Page 1 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Sharen Elam, Director of Finance Ext. 1713 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-105, Amending the Fee Schedule Action Requested: Approval of Resolution No. 00-105 Background Information: The Fee Schedule establishes the amounts charged for a variety of services and products provided by the City. Each year staff reviews the Fee Schedule to determine if the amounts are appropriate for the service provided, or if new services have been introduced that need to be included in the Schedule. Each Director has reviewed and made recommendations for fee changes within their scope of responsibility. The NCTCOG Annual Fee Survey of area cities is used as a guide to determine the reasonableness of fees. The Fee Schedule is intended to recover the actual cost associated with providing services or products. The Fee Schedule is grouped in Sections according to type of activity. This amendment creates two additional Sections: 1) Section VII — Library Services and; 2) Section VIII — Fire Service Activities. Financial Considerations: None required Citizen Input/ Board Review: None required Legal Review: None required Alternatives: Approve, deny or modify attached fee schedule. Supporting Documents: Resolution No. 00-105 Amended Fee Schedule Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 00-105 IDA-1 RESOLUTION NO.00-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 99-57; PROVIDING THAT THIS RESOLUTION SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-59;94-46, NO.94-61, NO.95-05, NO.95-34, NO.95-50, NO.96-57, NO.97-50, NO.97-59, NO. 99-07; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 592 providing for the adoption of fees and revisions thereto from time to time by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council with Resolution No. 99-57, set a schedule of fees for certain services; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Fee Schedule and has determined that certain fees should be amended in the fee schedule. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, THAT: Section 1. That Schedule of Fees be amended per the attached City of Southlake Fee Schedule. Section 2. That this resolution shall be cumulative of all provisions of Resolution No. 99-57 of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this resolution are in direct conflict with provisions of such resolution, in which event the conflicting provisions of such resolution are hereby repealed. Section 3. That the fees established herein shall be effective upon passage of this Resolution and shall take precedence over any fees previously adopted which are in conflict herewith. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF .2001. ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By: m-,i Rick Stacy, Mayor CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE SECTION I. Administrative Activities 1. NSF Check Return Charge (amended Res. #97-59) $20.00 Credit Card Return Charge $20.00 2. Cost of Copies of Public Information (amended Res. #98-70) according to the approved General Services Commission Charge Schedule (Attachment "A") 3. Water Customer Mailing Labels (Amended Res. #97-59) 4.Offense/Accident Report : (Amended Res. #95-50) Basic Certified Written Certification that no report exists 5. Burning Permits 6. Ambulance Fees (amended Res. #98-70): Local Transport 7. House Moving Permit 8. Solicitation/Vendor Permit 9. Seasonal Permits 10. Vital Statistics: Certificate of Death Certificate of Birth (Amended Res. #95-34) $45.00 $ 4.00 $ 6.00 $ 4.00 $0.00 $300.00 $10.00 + $1,000 Surety Bond + 1.5 x hourly rate of 2 police officers utilized in the move $35.00 (Co. license) +$10.00 15.00/Agent + $1,000 Surety Bond $25.00 $9.00 / 1st copy 3.00 each add'1 copy at time of initial request $13.00 / copy 11. Wrecker Permit Fee: (Amended Res.#94-61) Permit fee per wrecker vehicle $24.00 per year (waived for contract agency) Permit Fee per authorized driver $12.00 per year (waived for contract agency) (r,r,,.,ieipal r, tu4 Fines and Fees Only. PAGE 1-FEE SCHEDULE 10 A-3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE .. , W.. _ .. . .. No N... • .. 12. Alarm Permit Residential Commercial Apartment SECTION II. Community Development Activities 1. Board of Adjustment requests 2. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance 3. Zoning Only 4. Concept Plan Only 5. Zoning and Concept Plan (amended Res. #98-70) 6. Zoning and Site Plan (amended Res. #98-70) 7. Specific Use Permit 8. Site Plans 9. Amended Plat A- 4 lots 10. Amended Plat > 4 lots 11. Plat Showing (1 lot) 12. Plat Showing (multiple lots) $10.00 annually $20.00 annually $10.00 annually per unit $200.00/request $200.00/request $200.00 + $10/Acre $200.00 + $10/Acre $400.00 + $20/Acre $400.00 + $20/Acre $200.00 + $10/Acre $300.00 + $10/Acre $200.00 + $20/Lot/Res $200.00 + $20/Ac-Comm $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm $200.00 + $20/Lot-Res $200.00 + $20/Ac-Comm $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac/Comm PAGE 2-FEE SCHEDULE 1na_4 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE 13. Preliminary Plat (Non-P.U.D.) $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm 14. Preliminary Plat (P.U.D.) $300.00 + $30/Lot-Res $300.00 + $30/Ac-Comm 15. Final Plat (Non-P.U.D.) $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm 16. Final Plat (P.U.D.) (amended Res. #98-70) $400.00 + $30/Lot-Res $300.00 + $30/Ac-Comm 17. Plat Revision $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm 18. Plat Vacation $200.00 Flat Fee 19. Rush Plat Filing $300.00 Flat Fee 20. Plat Extension Processing Fee $100.00 Flat Fee 21. Two -County Filing (amended Res. #98-70) $60.00 Flat Fee 22. Extra Plat Page Filing $20.00 Flat Fee 23. Color Mapping (1:1000) (amended Res. #98-70) $20.00 per map 24. Color Mapping (1:2000) (amended Res. #98-70) $10.00 per map 25. Aerial Photo Print (added Res. #98-70) $15.00 per photo print 26. Mapping 11 "x 17" plat reduction copies $2.00 per map 27. Mapping (digital tape format) (added Res. #95-34) $140.00 per tape 28. Street Name Change $100.00 per street 29. Park Land Dedication -Raw acreage cost $60,000 per acre (amended Res. #97-50) Fee Calculation in lieu of Park Land Dedication - (added Res. #98-70) Residential - 1 acre/40 dwelling units (40 lots) $1,500.00 per lot Non -Residential - 1 acre/50 gross acres $800.00 per gross acre PAGE 3-FEE SCHEDULE 10A�,':� CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE (W 30. Zoning Verification Letter (amended Res. #98-70) First letter within two months of zoning approval All subsequent letters 31. Zoning Administrator Opinion/Interpretation Letter 32. Filing of Certificates of Paid Taxes SECTION III. Public Works Activities 1. Administrative Processing Fee 2. Computer Drainage Study: HEC I: HEC II: 3. Construction Inspection 4. Street Cut Permit 5. Easement Abandonments 6. R.O.W. Abandonments 7. Easement/R.O. W. Dedications 8. Street Light Costs $0.00 $25.00 each $100.00 $2/page 2% Actual Construction Cost $400.00 + $10/Linear Foot $400.00 + $10/Linear Foot 3% Actual Construction Cost $15.00 per Street $150.00 Flat Fee $150.00 Flat Fee $100.00 per Easement Developer pays installation + 2-year operation cost SECTION IV. Water and Wastewater Utilities Activities (added Res. #98-70) 1. Water Meter Fee (Including Transponder) (amended Res. #98-70) 1" Meter $460.00 2" Meter (Turbo)-Sprinkler/Irrigation Only $850.00 2" Meter (Compound)-(Residential/Commercial) $2,000.00 4" Meter $2,500.00 6" Meter $3,700.00 8" Meter $4,500.00 PAGE 4-FEE SCHEDULE Inn_/_ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE 2. Sewer Tap Inspection Fee $75.00 3. Sewer Participation Fee (Added Res. #95-34) $1,300/lot 4. Water Administrative Service Charge $15.00 5. Water Deposits: Residential Accounts $50.00 Commercial Accounts Established by Utility Billing Supervisor 6. Fire Hydrant Meter Deposit (City Meter) (amended Res. #98-70) $900.00 Hydro Storz Quick Connect System Blind Cap 75.00 total $975.00 Fire Hydrant Meter Deposit (Privately Supplied Meter) $200.00 Hydro Storz Quick Connect System Blind Cap 75.00 total $275.00 7. Water Reconnect Fees for Non -Payment, Business Days Only: 8 a.m.-5 p.m.: 1st/2nd/3rd & subsequent $20/$40/$60 After 5 p.m.: Ist/2nd/3rd & subsequent $40/$60/$80 Weekends, anytime $40/$60/$80 8. Water Meter Re -installation Fee $50.00 9. Water Meter Reread Fee $5.00 10. Service Charge - Damaged or Broken Lock, (amended Res. #98-70) Meter and/or Transponder $25.00 11. Damaged meter and transponder replacement (added Res. #98-70): 1" Meter $86.00 1" Transponder $150.00 Meter Box $32.50 12. Late Utility Payment Fee 13. Additional or Replacement Recycling Bins Additional or Replacement Recycling Lids (added Res. #97-59) 16 P- 7 5% of Outstanding Balance $6.00 $4.00 PAGE 5-FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE 14. Water Meter Testing Fee SECTION V. Building_ Inspection Activities 1. Building Permit Fees 2. Water Well Permit 3. Tent Permit 4. Sign Permit, Permanent Type (1 - 50 sq ft) Sign Permit, Permanent Type (> 50 sq ft) Sign Permit, Temporary / Banner Type (amended Res. #98-70) Illuminated Sign, Electrical Permit $50.00 per test Per- th envy adepte T� .B.� (Adminis ve Gode)(Attachment B) $42.0075.00 $4-5-.025.00 $50.00 85.00minimum $1.00 / per each additional sq ft $25.00 o alert Annually, „ .. Included with sign permit fee 5. Sign Recovery Fee (1-50 sq ft) (added Res. #98-70) $25.00 * (>50 sq ft) $50.00 * *Plus any outside services required, such as a wrecker, at actual cost + 10% processing fee. 6. Request for Variance to Sign Ordinance 7. Culvert and/or Approach Permit (If no active building permit on the site) 8. Building Contractor's Registration Fee (all trades) 9. Tree Removal Permit 11. Smoking Area - Re -Inspection Fee (added Res. #98-70) 12. Game Court (Includes the court, nets, fencing and lighting) cw $100.00/fquest per application set $42.00 50.00 $75.00 $.00 per Permit $100.00 $100.00 per site plan/application PAGE 6-FEE SCHEDULE NOW CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE (bw 13. Temporary Construction or Sales Office $75.00 per trailer (Includes plumbing and electrical permits) 14. Inspections outside normal business hours $50.00 per hour (Minimum two hours) 15. Reinspections $50.00 (charged under provisions of section 305.8 of U.B.C. Administrative Code and charged as a result of reinspection for "stop -work orders") 16. Additional plan review $50.00 per hour (necessitated by changes, additions or revisions) (minimum one hour) 17. Use of outside consultants for plan review Actual cost or inspections not otherwise included. 18. Electrical, Plumbing, or Mechanical Permit $50.00 (Single trade permit) 19. Grading or Earth Disturbance permit $50.00 20. Fence or Retaining Wall Permit $75.00 21. Swimming Pool permit $200.00 22. Spas, Hot Tubs or fountains $100.00 23. Reroofing (wood shakes or shingles used) $50.00 (other materials -no fee for tear off and replacement of roof covering) 24. Temporary Electric Utility and Inspection Fee $100.00 25. Temporary "All Utility" and Inspection Fee $100.00 plus $2,000.00 refundable deposit 26. Temporary noise exemptions pen -nit 27. Request for variance to the noise ordinance 28. Request for variance to the lighting ordinance $25.00 $100.00 $200.00 PAGE 7-FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE 29. Non-refundable plan review deposit (Applied toward permit fee if permit provided.) New Commercial $500.00 Interior finish-out/remodel/<$25K val. $100.00 SECTION VI._Communrty Services Activities (Amended Res. #95-34, Res. #97-59, Res. #98-70, Res. #99-57) 1. Building Reservations for Residents - Bicentennial Park and Senior Center (amended Res. #97-59, Res. #98-70): Regular Meeting Fees peryea Regular scheduled meetings (4-12 per year) $40.00/year Regular scheduled meetings (>12 per year) $120.00/year Other meetings $15.00 per meeting Security and Clean-up Deposit $100.00 (refundable) Week day fneefing P0.0 2. Building Reservations for Special Activities (amended Res. #97-59, #98-70): Security and Clean-up Deposit $50.00 $100.00 (refundable) Bicentennial Park - The Lodge $15.00/hr Bicentennial Park - Community Center/feem $15.00%r/hr Senior Center Large meeting room $15.00/hr Senief Gentef Large fneefing-feem& Kitehen $33 SenierOentef Kite den usef@ $25nnn. 3.Organized Athletic Programs Meeting Fees (added Res. #98-70) Field Maintenance Fee 4. TVNCR Rental Fee 5. Equipment Rental: (Driver's license held) Tennis Racket & Balls (Courts on Hill) Volleyballs Basketballs 10A-10 $1,000,000 General Liability Insurance Policy $100 per- yeaf per paragraph 1 as per Facilities Usage Agreement No charge with reservation No charge No charge No charge PAGE 8-FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE 6. Reservations of Park Facilities ) (amended Res. #97-59, Res. #98-70): Security and Clean-up Deposit (Required only if group of 40 or more) (group-ef 100 of fnere fe) $50.00 100.00(refundable) Hilitep Pienie AT-$5. nin Pine TreezPi A . e $5. n BieefftenniulPavilien $8 nn Picnic Areas (including covered picnic tables) $5.00/4 hrs Bicentennial Park Pavilions Large Pavilions $25.00/4hrs Small Pavilions $15.00/4hrs Rustin Park Pavilion * $40.00/4hrs * (Reservations are subject to certain restrictions as per the Park Use Policy) 7. Reservations for Fields and Courts: Ballfields (No Lights) $750 15.0011.5 hr/field Ballfields (With Lights) $15:00 20.00/1.5 hr/field Soccer Fields $2.5O 15.0011.5 hr/field CIS use GeuA (HeekeyMaskethall) (amended Res #98 70) N^7 Gy 9 Sand Volleyball Courts $5.00/hr/court Tennis Courts (Courts on Hill -Bicentennial Park) $5.0011.5 hr4ee No Charge In -Line Hockey Court (added Res. #98a0) (Bicentennial Park -No Lights) $10.00 15.0011.5 hr In -Line Hockey Court (added Res. #98-70) (Bicentennial Park -With Lights) $20.00/1f/1.5 hr Basketball courts (added Res. #98-70) $5.00/hr/court Field Preparation Fees: Weekday Games $25.00/field Weekend Games $37.50/field 8. Southlake Tennis Center Court Usage Fees Court Usage fees per I1/Z hour $2.50 per person (resident) $3.50 per person (non-resident) League Fees $2.50 per person per session Annual memberships Junior (18 and under) $75.00 (resident) $100.00 (non-resident) PAGE 9-FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE Adult Individual Family SECTION VII. Library Services 1. Materials extended use fee (fee not to exceed cost of the item) Books Books on Cassette CD CD-ROM Magazines Videocassettes/DVD 2. Fees $250 00 200.00(resident) $273:00 225.00 (non-resident) $500.00 375.00 (resident) $550.00 425.00 (non-resident) $.25 per day $1.00 per day $1.00 per day $1.00 per day $.25 per day $1.00 per day Copies/Computer printout $.15 per page (including Internet downloads, graphics, CD-ROM $.15 per grayscale page product information and personal work) $.35 per color page Lost card $2.50 per card Non-resident card $25.00 per card/per year Section VIII. Fire Service Activities 1. Underground Storage Tanks (UST) 2. Aboveground Storage Tanks (AGST) 3. UST and AGST removal or Temporary out of service 4. Changing UST contents 5. Trench Burning Clearing Land/Rubbish 6. Fireworks (certified events only) 7. Dry Cleaning Operations, non-flammable liquids $100.00 $100.00 $50.00 $50.00 $500.00 $75.00 Per Day $25.00 PAGE 10-FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FEE SCHEDULE ACTIVITY FEE 8. Dry Cleaning Operations, flammable/combustible liquids $50.00 9. Explosives or Blasting Agents, use of $50.00 10. Hazardous Materials (Storage, dispense, use of) $50.00 11. Highly Toxic Pesticides (storage, use of) $50.00 12. High -Piled Combustible Storage $50.00 13. Tire Storage $25.00 14. LPG, 25-119 WGC $25.00 15. LPG, 120 - 1,999 WGC $50.00 16. LPG, 2,000 < WGC $75.00 17. LPG fueled vehicles/equipment in assemblies $25.00 18. Spraying and Dipping Operations $50.00 19.: After Hours Fire Inspection $50.00 per hour 2 hr minimum 20. Private Agency License Inspection/Certification 21 Asbestos Removal 22. Malls, covered 23. Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing Stations 24. Pyrotechnic material 25. Battery System IoA-ri $50.00 $50.00 $75.00 $50.00 $75.00 $50.00 PAGE 11-FEE SCHEDULE ATTACHMENT "A" Title 1. ADMINISTRATION (W Part V. GENERAL SERVICES COMMISSION Chapter 111. EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION Subchapter C. COST OF COPIES OF PUBLIC INFORMATION § 111.70 The General Services Commission Charge Schedule The following is a summary of the charges for copies of public information that have been adopted by the Commission. Service Rendered —Charge: (1) Standard paper copy--$.10 per page. (2) Nonstandard -size copy: (A) Diskette--$1.00 each; (B) Magnetic tape: (i) 4 mm.--$13.50 each; (ii) 8 n m.--$12 each; (W (iii) 9-track-411 each; (C) Data Cartridge: (i) 2000 Series-417.50 each; (ii) 3000 Series--S20 each; (iii) 6000 Series--S25 each; (iv) 9000 Series--$35 each; (v) 600A—$20 each; (D) Tape Cartridge: (i) 250 MB--$38 each; (ii) 525 MB-445 each; (E) VHS video cassette--$2.50 each; (F) Audio cassette—$1.00 each; (G) Oversized Paper copy--$.50 each; (H) Mylar (36-inch, 42-inch, and 48-inch): (i) 3 mil.--$.85/linear foot; Boa--14 ATTACHMENT "A" (ii) 4 mil.--$1.10/linear foot; (iii) 5 mil.--S1.35/linear foot, (I) Blueline/blueprint paper (all widths)--$.20/linear foot; (J) Other --Actual cost. (3) Personnel charge: (A) Programming personnel--S26 per hour; (B) Other personnel--$15 per hour. (4) Overhead charge--20% of personnel charge. (5) Microfiche or microfilm charge: (A) Paper copy--$.10 per page; (B) Fiche or film copy --Actual cost. (6) Remote document retrieval charge --Actual cost. (7) Computer resource charge: (A) Mainframe-410 per minute; (B) Midsize--$1.50 per minute; (C) Client/Server--$2.20 per hour; (D) PC or LAN--$1.00 per hour. (8) Miscellaneous supplies --Actual cost. (9) Postage and shipping charge --Actual cost. (10) Photographs --Actual cost. (11) Other costs --Actual cost. (12) Outsourced/Contracted Services --Actual cost. (13) No Sales Tax --No Sales Tax shall be applied to copies of public information. Source: The provisions of this § 111.70 adopted to be effective September 18, 1996, 21 TexReg 8587. Cross Reference: This Section cited in 1 TAC § 111.63, (relating to Charges for Providing Copies of Public Information ); 1 TAC § 161.1, (relating to Charges for Copies of Public Records); 1 TAC § 181.11, (relating to Charges for Public Records). R City of Southlake Fee Schedule Attachment R Construction/Building Permit Fee Schedule For One and Two Family Dwellings new or additions a combination permit including Building Permit, Electrical Permit, Plumbing Permit, Mechanical Permit, Drainage Inspection Fee, and Plan Review Fees the permit fee shall be $50.00 plus $0.67 per square foot of living area not including garages, carports, porches and similar spaces. The Combination Permit does not include Impact Fees as may be assessed by ordinance. 2. For Accessory Buildings or remodeling space inside previously permitted space inside a dwelling unit the combination permit fee shall be $50.00 plus $0.25 per square foot. For purposes of this schedule Manufactured Homes shall be figured at the accessory building rate. Where there is no specific area associated with the remodel the fee shall be $75.00. 3. For each commercial or nonresidential building the Combination Permit the permit fee shall be based on the valuation as specified in section 304.2* of the code and the table below: The Combination Permit includes Building Permit, Electrical Permit, Plumbing Permit, Mechanical Permit, Drainage Inspection Fee, and Plan Review Fees. The Combination Permit does not include Impact Fees as may be assessed by ordinance. COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to $500.00 $42.00 $501.00 to $2000.00 $42.00 for the first $500 plus $5.50 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof. $2001.00 to $25,000.00 $125.00 for the first $2000 plus $25.00 for each additional $1000. or fraction thereof. $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $700.00 for the first $25,000 plus $18.00 for each additional $1000.00 or fraction thereof. $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $1150.00 for the first $50,000 plus $12.50 for each additional $1000.00 or fraction thereof. $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1775.00 for the first $100,000 plus $10.00 for each additional $1000.00 or fraction thereof. $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3725.00 for the first $500,000 plus $8.50 for each additional $1000.00 or fraction thereof. $1,000,001.00 and up $8025.00 for the first $1,000,000 plus $5.50 for each additional $1000.00 or fraction thereof. if City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 8, 2001 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, ext. 2175 Subject: Approve the conceptual design of roadway improvements to Johnson Road from Pearson Lane to Randol Mill Avenue. Action Requested: Approve the conceptual design of roadway improvements to Johnson Road from Pearson Lane to Randol Mill Avenue. Background Information: The funding for the construction of roadway improvements to Johnson Road from Pearson Lane to Randol Mill Avenue was included in the 1999/2000 CIP. On May 16, 2000, the City Council authorized the execution of an engineering service contract with Halff and Associates for the preliminary engineering design and report for the roadway improvements to Johnson Road from Pearson Lane to Randol Mill Avenue. This section of roadway is a narrow hvo-lane roadway approximately a mile long. The roadway is defined on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan as a C2U collector. The roadway runs through an existing residential neighborhood and has Florence Elementary School located near the west end of the street. The construction of the roadway improvements is complicated by numerous trees located along the edge of pavement throughout the length of the project. The ultimate section for the roadway is a 40-foot wide street with curbs. In the preliminary design, Halff and Associates identified three different, possible, roadway sections and analyzed the impact of each. Reconstruction of the roadway, providing adequate drainage improvements and preservation of trees were the main considerations in the development of the conceptual design. A SPIN meeting was held on January 23), 2001 to discuss the preliminary design with area property owners and seek their comments and input. The property owners in the area had many questions and comments regarding the project. Their main concerns were: 1. Keep the roadway as a narrow two-lane roadway. 2. Preserve as many trees as possible. 3. Address the severe drainage problems in the middle of the project. 4. Provide sidewalks as much as possible for children walking to Florence Elementary School. 5. Provide traffic calming to reduce speeding along Johnson Road. 6. Extend the sanitary sewer lines as far as possible to provide sewer to property that, presently, does not have sewer. The project also includes the construction of a 12-inch water line underneath the roadway improvements. The conceptual design that is recommended by the design engineer, Halff and Associates and supported by the City Staff is to construct a 22 foot wide hot mix pavement without curbs, but with drainage improvements in the middle of the project. The design also includes left turn lanes at the intersection of Pearson Land and Randol Mill Avenue. Halff and Associates will make a presentation to the City Council regarding the conceptual design. After the Councils approval of the conceptual design, the City Staff will bring an engineering services contract, with Halff Associates for the preparation of construction plans and specifications for the roadway improvements to Johnson Road from Pearson Lane to Randol Mill Avenue back to the City Council. Financial Consideration: S1,200,000 is provided in the CIP for the design and construction of roadway improvements to Johnson Road from Pearson Lane to Randol Mill Avenue and $300,000 is provided in the CIP for the design and construction of a 12-inch water line along Johnson Road. Citizen Input/ Board Review: A SPIN meeting was held on January 23, 2000 - for citizen input. Legal Review: None. 10B-2 Alternatives: Approve it, deny it, or modify it. Supporting Documents: Map. Staff Recommendation: Please place on City Council agenda for February 20, 2001 for Council consideration and approval. City Staff recommends that Council approve the conceptual design as presented by Halff and Associates and staff. CT/ta 10B-3 Johnson Road Reconstruction N 10B-4 1 � • � :, �N � �—o-9oa � MEN I�w�-1 I W -100Ndd �0 MEN < J W W Ii i' N I1 LLI I J I I J i 1 + ail N it 1� II W LL Z Q� LJ J Q o N ID a x 0 0 �--- Q N 0 ct �I Z �Z I QQQ w o mom M U Z 1 �T �i J U v • ...L� O W Z z II J _ = OZZ 3 �� 0 f•,_�O !.J •N1 1Yn08 QZ W Ul U2 W J li 3 ¢LLJ)l V 00 Y v X W 'i O cr cr- w I; } m 1[Yal oNdla3Ao U Li u l i Y�l NoaaYW i J _ I'•. I 'I li — 3NV� NOSdd3d 10B-5 J City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 12, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Malcom Jackson, Chief of Building Services SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Lighting Ordinance No. 693-B, for Costco Wholesale, 2601 East SH 114. Action Requested: City Council consideration of request for variance of the Lighting Ordinance No. 693-B to permit Costco to utilize metal haylide lighting instead of high pressure sodium. Background Information: Ms. Dorothy Raven of AEM and Associates, Inc. has applied for a variance to the lighting ordinance on behalf of Costco. The lighting ordinance requires that "all lights on poles over 42 inches in height... shall be high pressure sodium lights or other lights giving a similar soft lighting effect." While the ordinance does not address the "color" of the light, it does require "soft" lighting similar to high pressure sodium. While "softness" is strictly an aesthetic quality that does not have a technical definition with respect to the ordinance, the Building Official has ruled that metal halide lighting is in and of itself substantially different to the intent of the ordinance and not permitted. The ordinance provides that a person may appeal to the city council, after a recommendation from the P&Z, for a variance to the ordinance requirements. This item was presented to the P&Z on February 8, 2001 and received a recommendation to deny the request. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: This item was submitted to the P&Z for a recommendation to the City Council. The P&Z recommended in a unanimous vote to deny the variance request. Legal Review: Not Applicable. Alternatives: Not Applicable Supporting Documents: Ordinance No. 693-B Planning Commission Recommendation: On February 8, 2001, a motion to recommend denial of the Lighting Variance for Costco was approved 6-0. >tJC-1 Staff Recommendation: Place this variance request on the February 20 City Council meeting for action by the City Council. BP/mj LILY UI JUUII IIdRC, I UAd' MEMORANDUM January 16, 2001 TO: Bruce Payne, Planning Director FROM: Ricky Black, DPS Director SUBJECT: Costco Wholesale, Lighting Variance, 2601 E. State Hwy. 114 Ms. Dorothy Raven of AEM and Associates, Inc. has applied for a variance to the lighting ordinance 693-B, Section 4 (b) on behalf of Costco for their facility under construction at the above address. The request is to use the metal halide lights instead of the high pressure sodium as specified in the ordinance. The principal difference between the two is the color of the light. The high pressure sodium lights give off a yellowish color and the metal halide lights are much whiter. The high pressure sodium lights are approximately 10% more energy efficient than the metal halide but the metal halide gives a much better color rendition. Section 4 of the Lighting Ordinance is very specific in the requirements. It requires that lights "on poles over 42 inches in height and all exterior wall mounted light fixtures shall be high pressure sodium lights or other lights giving a similar soft lighting effect." It does, however, permit the building official to approve alternate lighting if he finds that it "provides at least approximate equivalence to the applicable specific requirements of the ordinance and is otherwise satisfactory and complies with the intent of the ordinance." While the ordinance does not address the "color" of the light, it does require "soft" lighting similar to high pressure sodium. While "softness" is strictly an aesthetic quality that does not have a technical definition with respect to lighting, the Building Official has ruled this is substantially different. Section 10 provides that "a person who is dissatisfied with the decision of the building official may file an appeal. The person may file an appeal not more than 10 days after the determination of the building official. The Building Official verbally discussed this matter with the applicant in November of 2000, advising of the denial to consider metal halide as an approved alternative and advising the applicant they could seek a variance. Section 10 also permits the City Council to grant a variance. However, the procedures require that the matter first be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a recommendation to be made to the City Council. The City Council may then grant a variance in either of the two following circumstances: Bruce Payne Costco Wholesale Lighting Variance January 16, 2001 Page 2 (1) "Upon finding that strict application of the Ordinance would not forward the purposes of this Ordinance, or that alternatives proposed by the applicant would satisfy the purposes of this Ordinance at least to an equivalent degree," for] (2) "Upon finding that an outdoor light, or system of outdoor lights required for a particular use cannot reasonably comply with the standard and provide sufficient illumination for safety, as determined by recommended practices adopted by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North American for the particular use or other evidence submitted by a professional engineer." Costco's letter of November 30, 2000 serves as their notice of application for the purposes of this variance request as permitted under section 10 of the ordinance. Costco is making the request based upon two perceived elements: (1) The color rendition of high pressure sodium means the perception to the customer is less bright and less safe. (2) The yellow tint of the high pressure sodium give off ZD a dingy quality that ultimately affects the aesthetics and color of the building. We are processing the applicant's request for a variance. Please schedule this item for consideration of the Planning and Zoning Commission so they can provide their recommendation and allow it to be forwarded to the City Council for a final decision. You can notify the applicant and staff of the assigned agenda dates. RBpw Attachments: Appeal Letter Lighting Ordinance 693-B 0 n m AEM & ASSOCIATES, INC. ZSO NORTH MILL STREET, UNIT 1 • LE Wt9VILLE, TX 7SO57 November 30, 2000 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Mr. Paul Ward RE: Costco Wholesale 5300 Overton Ridge Ft. Worth, Texas Dear Mr. Ward: Our behalf of our client, Costco Wholesale, we respectfully submit a request for a variance per Ordinance No. 693-B Section 10(a) of the City of Southlake Lighting Ordinance. The Costco Wholesale would propose to use metal halide lights at a height of thirty-five (35) feet in lieu of high-pressured sodium lights. Costco is requesting this change due to two perceived problems with sodium lights: 1. High-pressure sodium lights are much closer in the light spectrum to red than metal halide. Since red is the first color field to drop of the visual spectrum at night, Costco feels that even though the light meter may read the same level of light as a metal halide, the perception to the customer is less bright and less safe. 2. Costco feels that the yellow tint of the sodium light gives off a dingy quality that ultimately affects the aesthetics and color of the building. If this variance is approved the outdoor lighting in the development would meet all other standards of the City of Southlake Lighting Ordinance. We respectfully request your approval of the proposed addition. If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to call me at (972) 221-8788. , Cc: Larry Harder @ Costco Greg McGahey @ AEM Brett Hansen @ Mulvanny Architect Very truly yours, Dorothy Raven I T=L. 97Z/22 1 -B7t3B FAx: 972/�21 ORDINANCE NO. 693-B AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTDOOR LIGHTING; ESTABLISHING ILLUMINATION STANDARDS; ESTABLISHING LUMINANCE LIMITS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF CERTAIN ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 if the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has previously adopted regulations providing for requirements for outdoor lighting in certain zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to provide for more comprehensive regulations regarding the provision of outdoor lighting on private property within the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. PURPOSE This Ordinance sets forth minimum criteria for the installation, use and maintenance of outdoor lighting, the purposes of which are to: (a) preserve and enhance the lawful nighttime use and enjoyment of property; (b) protect drivers and pedestrians on nearby travel ways from disabling glare from non - vehicular light sources that shine directly into their eyes and thereby impair safe travel; (c) shield neighboring properties from nuisance glare and trespass resulting from improperly directed or unshielded shield light sources; ORDINANCE NO. 693-B PAGE 3 of 12 C-TEMP'LIGHTNG APPEAL COSTCO. DOC (d) preclude or lessen light pollution; (e) promote efficient design and operation with regard to energy conservation; and to (i) curtail the degradation of the nighttime visual environment. SECTION 2. EXEMPTIONS (1) The following uses shall be exempt from the requirements of this Ordinance: (1) Lighting installed on property used for a single-family or two-family_ dwelling; (2) Lighting, such as street lights and traffic signal devices, installed by a governmental agency for traffic safety control purposes on public rights -of - way or property. (3) Temporary special effects of holiday lighting. (4) Lighting which is not subject to this Ordinance by state or federal law. (5) Specific exemptions as may be reviewed by the planning and zoning commission and approved by the city council during a development, site plan, or other similar review process so long as the requirements of Section 9 are met. (2) Other temporary lighting effects may be used for a period not to exceed 10 days if approved by the building official or his designated representative. Any person may submit a written request, on a form furnished by the city, to the building official for a temporary exemption. The building official shall consider the following information in determining whether to approve a request for temporary exemption: (1) specific exemption requested; (2) type and use of outdoor light fixture involved; (3) duration of time for the requested exemption; (4) type of lamp and calculated lumens; (5) proposed location on premises of the outdoor light fixture; and (6) physical size of outdoor light fixtures and type of shielding provided. ORDINANCE NO.693-B PAGE 4 of 12 C.,TEMP1UGHTMG .APPEkL C05TCO. DOC (3) An applicant may appeal any denial of such application to the city council, by requesting a modification in accordance with Section 10. Such appeal must be filed with the building official not more than 10 days after the denial. SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS The following words when used in this Ordinance, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Bollard luminaire means a luminaire on a pole not over 42 inches in height designed to project light below a horizontal plane running through the top of the fixture. Candela means the unit of luminous intensity in a given direction. It is commonly called one candlepower. Diffusing Luminaires means a luminaire that scatters light substantially in all directions as contrasted with a directional luminaire which confines its light principally in an angle of less than 180 degrees. Floodlight means a luminaire designed to project its light in a defined area. It is directional in character. Floodlight beam means the angular spread of light between two orthogonal planes each of which equal ten percent of the maximum candlepower within the beam. Footcandle means the amount of illumination provided by one lumen uniformly distributed on one square foot of surface. Footlambert means the luminance of a surface uniformly emitting, transmitting, or reflecting one lumen per square foot of surface. Illumination means the density of the luminous flux (lumens) incident on a surface. It is the quotient of the luminous flux divided by the area of the surface, expressed in foot candles. Light source means a device (such as a lamp) which produces visible energy as distinguished from devices or bodies that reflect or transmit light, such as a luminaire. Lumen means the quantity of luminous flux intercepted by a surface of one square foot, all points of which are one foot from a uniform source of one candela. A one -candela source provides 12.57 lumens. ORDINANCE NO. 693-B PAGE 5 of 12 C. TEMP'UGHTING APPEAL COSTCO DOC Luminaire means a device or fixture containing a light source and means for directing and controlling the distribution of light from the source. Luminance means the luminous intensity per unit projected area of a given surface viewed from a given direction for purposes of this Ordinance expressed in candelas divided by distance squared. Glare means light emitting from a luminaire with an intensity great enough to reduce a viewer's ability to see. SECTION 4. LIGHTING DESIGN (�} Lighting systems, including the placement of luminaires, shall meet the requirements of this Ordinance. (2) Luminaires on poles over 42 inches in height and exterior wall mounted light fixtures shall be high pressured sodium lights or other lights giving a similar soft lighting effect. The building official may approve alternate lighting if he finds that it: (1) provides at least approximate equivalence to the applicable specific requirements of this Ordinance; and (2) is otherwise satisfactory and complies with the intent of this Ordinance. (c) Fully recessed lights in ceilings of canopies or roof overhangs may be of any type provided the level of illumination does not exceed the limitations specified in Section 5 hereof. See Appendix Illustration B. (d) Luminaires causing glare at property line or in vehicle areas on streets or parking lots are prohibited. (e) Incandescent bulbs may be used as decorative lighting provided the individual lamps do not exceed 25 watts and do not otherwise conflict with this Ordinance. SECTION 5. ILLUMINATION (a) The intensity of illumination projected from one property to another property is determined by the zoning district classification of the neighboring property and shall not exceed the following intensities, as measured from the property line of the neighboring property: Footcandles I Footcandles Horizontal Vertical ORDINANCE NO. 693-B PAGE 6 of 12 C. TE11F IJGHT[..1'G .aPPEk1. COSTCO.DOC Zoning of Neighboring Property Agricultural, Single-family, and two-family residential districts 0.2 0.5 Multiple -family residential districts 0.5 0.5 Nonresidential districts, streets 3.0 3.0 Light industrial districts 5.0 5.0 (b) The maximum outdoor computed or measured illumination level on a property shall not exceed 20 foot candles outdoors at any point, except that lighting under canopies (such as service stations) shall not exceed 30 foot candles. SECTION 6. MEASUREMENT. (a) Meter required. Lighting levels of outdoor lighting shall be measured in foot candles with a direct reading portable light meter with a color and cosine corrected sensor with multiple scales. The meter shall read within an accuracy of plus or minus five percent. It shall have been tested and calibrated by an independent commercial photometric laboratory or the manufacturer within one year of date of use as attested to by a certificate issued by such laboratory. (b) Horizontal method of measurement. The meter sensor shall be mounted not more than six inches above ground level in a horizontal position. Readings shall be taken only after the cell has been exposed to provide a constant reading. Measurements shall be made when the meteorological optical range is six miles or further so that measurements will not be adversely affected by atmospheric scatter. Measurements shall be made after dark with the existing questioned light sources on, then with the same sources off. This procedure eliminates the effects of moonlight and other ambient light. The difference between the two readings shall be compared to the footcandle ratings listed in Section 5(a) hereof. (c) Vertical method of measurement. The meter sensor shall be mounted at five feet above ground level in a vertical position, perpendicular to the property line and facing the outdoor lighting in question. Reading shall be taken only after the cell has been exposed to provide a constant reading. Measurements shall be made after dark with the existing questioned light sources on, then with the same sources off. This procedure eliminates the effects of moonlight and other ambient light. The difference between the two readings shall be compared to the footcandle ratings listed in Section 5(a) hereof. (d) Computation of illumination. Illumination at a point may be computed in lieu of measurement. Computation methods shall consist of a generally accepted Illuminating Engineering society method, using certified photometric data furnished ORDINANCE NO. 693-B PAGE 7 of 12 C. TEMFUGHMNG %?PE>L _OSTCO DOC by the fixture manufacturer, lamp manufacturer, photometric laboratory, or other „r reliable authority satisfactory to the city. Computations shall be based on new, properly seasoned lamps, new and clean fixtures, and at rated voltage and wattage, with ballasts, lenses, shields, diffusers, and other appurtenances in place, and with proper regard taken for mounting height, relative elevation, natural and manmade objects. SECTION 7. LUMINANCE. (a) Limits. The intensity of luminance projected from one property to another is determined by the zoning district classification of the neighboring property and shall not exceed the following limits: Zoning of Neighboring Property Luminance (1) Single-family and two-family residential districts 0.02 (2) Multiple -family residential districts 0.05 (3) Nonresidential districts, streets 0.30 (4) Industrial districts 0.50 j (b) Calculations generally. Because of the lack of a practical means of measuring fixture luminance in the field, and because of the factors involved in glare, a computational method shall be used, the results of which determine compliance with this section. The point from which luminance calculations shall be made is five feet above ground at the property line of the property adjacent to the property with the outdoor lighting. (c) Luminance calculations using luminaire photometric data. Luminance shall be computed by the formula: L= I d` + h` where "I" is the fixture candlepower in candelas in the direction of the point from which the calculations are to be made, "d" is the shortest distance in feet measured horizontally from the property line to a point directly under the luminaire, and "h" is the height of the luminaire above the eye level as explained in Appendix A illustration. ORDINANCE NO. 693-B PAGE 8 of 12 C TENPLJGr: NG APPEAL COSTCO DOC SECTION 8. ENFORCEMENT. (a) Illumination in excess of limits. If the illumination, as measured, exceeds the limits stated in Section 5 hereof, the illumination shall be reduced until the illumination is equal to or less than the limits prescribed in Section 5. This may be accomplished by removal of the light, reduction in the quantity of luminaires, reduction of the wattage of the lamps, shielding the luminaires or aiming of the luminaires. (b) Luminance in excess of limits. If the luminance of a luminaire, as calculated, exceeds the limitations stated in Section 7 hereof, the luminance shall be reduced until the luminance is equal to or less than the limits prescribed in Section 7. This may be accomplished by reduction of the wattage of the lamps, shielding the luminaire of by re -aiming of the luminaires. (c) Shielding. Luminaires shall be aimed in such a manner that the viewer's eye, five feet above ground at or beyond the property line, shall not be exposed to fixture luminance within the floodlight beam of the luminaire. If such luminaires cannot be aimed they shall be shielded such that the light source is effectively concealed from view from the neighboring property. Shielding may be accomplished by louvers, baffles, visors, or shields placed on the luminaires, or by plantings, fences, berms, elevation, or any other method such that the limitations of Section 7 hereof are met. SECTION 9. PLANS AND SUBMITTALS. (a) Lighting plans submitted for review and approval for concept plans, site plans, and building permits shall include a schematic lay -out of all proposed exterior fixture locations, footcandle data, and a plot demonstrating intensities and uniformities within the limitations established in this Ordinance. (b) When requested by the building official, the applicant shall submit a visual impact photometric plan that demonstrates both light coverage and light spillage resulting from the proposed lighting plan and the provision for adequate measures to mitigate nuisance from light pollution and disabling glare both on the uses or development site and on adjacent properties. (c) Should any outdoor light fixture or the type of light source be changed after receiving approval pursuant to this Ordinance, the owner shall submit a change request to the building official for his approval, together with adequate information to assure compliance with this Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 693-B PAGE 9 of 12 C TENIP'LIGHTISG APPEAL COSTCO DOC _ SECTION 10. APPEALS; VARIANCES; MODIFICATIONS (a) A person may request a modification or variance from the provisions of this Ordinance. The person shall submit an application for a variance to the building official on forms prescribed by the building official. (b) A person who is dissatisfied with the decision of the building official may file an appeal. The person may file an appeal not more than 10 days after the determination of the building official. The person shall submit an appeal to the building official on forms prescribed by the building official. (c) The city council, after receiving a recommendation from the planning and zoning commission, may grant a modification or variance from the provisions of this Ordinance in either of the following circumstances: (1) Upon finding that strict application of the Ordinance would not forward the purposes of this Ordinance, or that alternatives proposed by the applicant would satisfy the purposes of this Ordinance at least to an equivalent degree. (2) Upon finding that an outdoor light, or system of outdoor lights required for a particular use cannot reasonably comply with the standard and provide sufficient illumination for safety, as determined by recommended practices adopted by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North American for the particular use or other evidence submitted by a professional engineer. (d) The city council, may impose such conditions on a modification or variance which it deems appropriate to further the purposes of this Ordinance. SECTION 11. CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES. All outdoor electrically powered illuminating devices shall be installed in conformance with the provisions of this Ordinance, the Building Code and the Electrical Code, as applicable. SECTION 12. EXISTING LIGHTING (a) When outdoor lighting does not conform to the provisions of this Ordinance and lawfully exists on the effective date of this Ordinance or when plans for outdoor lighting has been ORDINANCE NO. 693-B PAGE 10 of 12 C: TEMP LIGHTING APPEAL COSTCO DOC lawfully submitted in connection with an application for a building permit, concept plan, development plan or site plan, it shall be deemed a lawful use, subject to the following conditions: (1) If a person makes any change or addition to an existing lighting system, the change or addition shall conform to the provisions of this Ordinance; and (2) If a person makes any change or addition to an existing building which results in an increase in the size of the building by more than 20 percent, the person shall ensure that the existing outdoor lighting shall conform to the provisions of this Ordinance. (b) A person may file an application for a variance from the requirements of Section 12(b) with the City Council as provided in Section 10 hereof. In considering whether to grant a such a variance, the City Council shall consider, in addition to the factors enumerated in Section 10 hereof, the costs necessary to comply with this Ordinance and the extent of economic hardship that a person would incur in order to conform to the provisions of Section 12 (b) hereof. SECTION 13. PENALTY Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 14. PUBLICATION The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of ORDINANCE \O. 693-B PAGE 11 of 12 C TEMRL1GHTM .APPEAL CC> -CO DOC its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 15. SEVERABILITY It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 16. CUMULATIVE CLAUSE This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Specifically, this ordinance shall be cumulative of the provisions regarding outdoor lighting as contained in the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 17. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to all applications for building permits filed on or after the effective date. ORDINANCE NO. 693-B PAGE 12 of 12 C TEM? UGH-ING APPEAL. COSTCO. DOC PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 1999. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 1999. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY ORDINANCE NO.693-B PACE 13 of 12 C TEMPLIGHTI\G APPEAL. COSTCO. DOC 14 A Factors for Luminance Determination APPENDIX ILLUSTRATIONS Luminaire Property line r in of eye Eye Level _ � I Observer T— Grade varies- 0 L'? Ceiling Light in Canopy or Overhang ORDINA.`CE NO. 693-B PAGE 14 of 12 C TEf47UG. RG {PPEALCOSTCO DOC City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 16, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Rick Black, Interim Director of Public Safety (Ext. 2421) SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Costco Wholesale located at 2601 East S.H. 114. Action Requested: City Council consideration of a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A. Background Information: The Costco Wholesale building is in the Gateway Plaza Shopping Center Phase H Lot 1 Block 1. Dorothy Raven of AEM and Associates, on behalf of Costco Wholesale, has requested a variance to erect signs as shown on the attached plans. This would vary the following sections of Sign Ordinance No. 704-A: ♦ Section 16.A.4 to allow one additional sign at the tire facility, which is regarded as a separate premise and thus allowed one sign at the entrance. ♦ Section 16.A.7 to allow external illumination of the "Costco Wholesale" signs. The signs shown on the attached drawings otherwise comply with the sign ordinance. The third "Costco Wholesale" sign is allowed under the conditional sign permit for Gateway Plaza Phase II. For the purpose of interpreting the sign ordinance, the tire store and optical facility are deemed separate premises since each have their own entrance, and are thereby allowed one sign each. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None Alternatives: The council may approve the request, deny the request, or approve it subject to whatever conditions they deem appropriate. Supporting Documents: Variance Application Form Sign Drawings Ordinance No.704-A, Sections 16.4,7 Staff Recommendation: Place the variance request on the February 20, 2001 City Council meeting for Council action. RB/sv 1OD-1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION APPLICANT NAME: Dorothy Raven ADDRESS PHONE FAX: 250 Mill Street, Unit 1 Lewisville, Texas 75057 972-221-8788 972-221-8168 OWNER (if different) Costco '"17bol 46000 Manekin Plaza Sterling VA 20166-6513 703-406-6882 703-406-6835 The following information pertains to the location for Which the variance is requevted NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: Costco Wholesale STREET ADDRESS: 2601 E. State Hwy. 114, Southlake, TX 76092 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 Block- 1 Subdivision Gateway Plaza, Phase II I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 704 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a representative at the City Council meeting who is authorized to discuss t is request. Applicant's signature: J K d Date: 1/26/2001 The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No.704 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached). Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R. 0. W. Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 1OD-2 Demonstration Please demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the requested sign variance: 1.That a literal enforcement of the sign regulation will crate an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant • Considering height of walls and size of signs, keeping all internally illuminated lamps in working order is extremely difficult to maintain. • Limitation on directional signage would result in less user-friendly facility. 2 . That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. • Typical Costco sign package is painted, externally illuminated. Proposed is metal, reverse pan. Ordinance requires much higher life cycle cost and initial installations cost. • If the additional signs are not approved it will be very difficult to determine the location of services such as tire installation and optical center for the customer. 3 - That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. • The proposed Costco sign keeps with the intent of the City of Southlake sign ordinance and will be aesthetically pleasurable to look at. • The additional signage will enhance the ease and convenience of the shopper by directing them to the services. 4. That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. • Overall amount of signage being requested minimal in comparison of total linear feet of wall. • Signs are simple and to the point. Three (3) total for marketing. Six (6) total for directional purposes. • Externally illuminated, reverse metal pan letters are easier to maintain and less prone to wind or vandalism damage translating to a better long-term appearance. 1OD-3 r n Z 0 �0 r r D Z Z Z D Z 0 N 0 z U1 m Z a r M Z 1 Ln January 26, 2001 Mr. Skip Vandergriff City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 RE: Costco Wholesale Sign Variance Gateway Plaza Phase II, Lot 1, Block 1 Dear Mr. Vandergriff AEM & ASSOCIATES. INc. Z50 NORTH MILL 9TR E6T. UNIT 1 . LEWI®NIECE. TX 75057 Please accept the enclosed packet of information as a request for a variance from the City of Southlake Sign Ordinance (Ord. No. 704-A). The applicant requests a variance to construct an attached sign with external illumination. The attached sign will be constructed of a durable reverse pan aluminum material and will be illuminated by external signage luminare. The applicant would also request a variance to allow for additional directional signs to be located on the building. These signs would be attached to the building with no illumination. The total number of additional signs would be four (4). The following is enclosed for your review: 1. Variance Application 2. Completed Demonstration Form 3. Site Plan indicating location of all proposed signs 4. Elevations of all proposed signs 5. Photos of proposed externally illuminated signs. We respectfully request that this item be placed on the February 20, 2001 City Council Agenda since we have a lighting variance scheduled that City Council Meeting. If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to call me at (972) 221-8788. Cc: Larry Harder cc Costco Greg McGahey, @AEM Very truly yours, j 64,, Dorothy Raven 1OD-4 TEE: 972/221 -B7B6 FAX: 972/22 7 -B 1 6B yloi M t C n W3 1OD-5 I it- :`'61 ! P i 0W'.i fez e— iS it 7 u Q0. 00 i IIP II r �ia4 U3Yf �w Q z ! 2 1 rrr S IN s s s w �I Z LL K 44gg � pp HXX Y 1! YS U11 �'l Ypt' YYd k NOR 'E i�' �tla�5 � 1 ' s •4:ff Sr4c4fR v •� �-�;l..fl:a i 0�3 ;fir 0 r ; u31� N N Lc. LL Lc. .!JI .w my m-j % QN QJ aKiM W qN fp M W N Q oHI� (AQQtt�� =Y� N i_ US1 Vi<§ � Wo. Ell a mm z Fsosd��s6 - o a7 nw z 'Aft / & --------------------------�- cw o O O in 10D- 6 WdOl417: 060/lO/l0'BMP'l-lOSV9ZS8\09Z9-86\96\-ISoOFH 1 yC iiwp.s' t;F� �i C' x � F, F t 3 �r k, i R s A A The following sections have been excerpted from the Sign Ordinance No. 704-A kw§EC. VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Signs may not be attached to light fixtures, poles, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, streets, utility poles, public buildings, fences, railings, public telephone poles, or trees. The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a three (3) square foot area used for building identification. 2. MINIMUM /MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six (6) inches. The maximum height allowed for letters or logos shall be based on the following criteria: Distance From R.O.W. * Less than 100 ft. 101 - 150 ft. 151 - 200 ft. 201 - 250 ft. 251 - 300 ft. 301 and greater Maximum Letter/Logo Height 12 inches 18 inches 24 inches 30 inches 36 inches 42 inches * - For any lease space that does not front on a street, the maximum letter/logo height shall be based on the distance from the vehicular driveway access (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). 3. MAXIMUM AREA: 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet (see Appendix 'A' for further clarification). i11 e 4. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one attached sign per lease space shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. A secondary sign may be permitted at a public entrance, provided the entrance is on another side of the building, but shall be limited to twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary or permitted sign size, whichever is more restrictive. The six (6) inch minimum letter/logo height will not apply to these secondary signs. No more than two (2) attached signs shall be allowed per lease space. Attached signs shall be located within the first story of the main exterior entrance for a building or lease space (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). 5. SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent (75%) of the width of any building or lease space. In the event the lease space facade is horizontally articulated, the 75% rule shall apply to the allowed sign to be located on any single plane facade (see Appendix 'B' for further clarification). 6. ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof line of any building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend above the parapet wall. Signs shall be no closer vertically to the eave of the roofline or overhang than the predominant letter height (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). Signs may be attached to a continuous plane fascia, if the sign does not extend above or below the projection of the fascia. Signs attached to fascia are only allowed when attached to structural canopy supported to the ground by columns constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure (See Appendix `B' for further clarification). 7. ILLUMINATION: Attached signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting. Exterior letters with exposed neon lighting are not allowed. 8. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") from the building, excluding signs attached to canopies. 9. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any facade (other than the main front of the building) which faces property zoned for single-family residential uses if the sign is within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the property line of said residential property. 1OD-10 City of Southlake Department of Planning METNIORANDUM February 2, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Bruce Payne, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment REQUESTED ACTION: Consider changing the Land Use Plan designation for the Clow/Carroll. Independent School District properties (See Attachment A) from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. BACKGROUND: The subject properties (91 acres) are located between Shady Oaks Drive and N. Peytonville Drive and are currently zoned "AG" Agriculture. Approximately 70 acres is owned by J. Clow and 20 acres of land is owned by the Carroll Independent School District (C.I.S.D.). A future middle school is scheduled to be constructed on the C.I.S.D. property near N. Peytonville Avenue. Current properties owners of the area under review are listed below: OWNER ACREAGE J. Clow 70 C.I.S.D. 20 V. Swirc nski 1 In November 2000, the City Council amended the Master Thoroughfare Plan to provide a (C2U) east -west connector in this area. STAFF COMMENT: The Planning staff contacted Mr. Clow concerning the possible land use designation change on his property. Mr. Clow indicated to staff that he was adamantly opposed to the proposed land use change. Mr. Clow indicated to staff that he believed that a land use change from Agenda Item 10E J medium density residential to low density residential would decrease the value of the property. Staff also contacted Brent Kline with Total Project Management (C.I.S.D. consultants). Mr. Kline indicated that the City Council may wish to consider a Public/Semi-Public land use designation in lieu of a Low Density Residential land use designation for the C.LS.D. property. A Public/Semi Public designation would be more representative of the future land use on the property and serve as an indicator to residents that a school is planned for this site. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None ALTERNATIVES: 1. Schedule public hearings to consider amending the Land Use Plan from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential for the subject area; or 2. Take no action at this time. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Attachment A-Clow/C.I.S.D. Property Map Attachment B-Land Use Map BP/Attachments (2) N:\Community Development,MVP-F[LES\MEMO\LUPAmdClowl.doc Agenda Item HE J C.I.S.D. & CLOW PROPERTY ATTACHMENT A —Z� vi�6uNtav c.�.. _, '11— — •rye.^.�.,— : t -- Hc0A MnNE0.. `�--"— 2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 Feet ® C.I.S.D. & Clow Property Current Zoning: AG Land use Designation: Medium Density Residential Agenda Item 10E 77 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 16, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: John Eaglen, Assistant to the City Manager (481-1433) SUBJECT: Charter Review Status Action Requested: City Council discussion of the status of the Charter Review process and of the desire to hold a Charter Amendment Election on May 5, 2001. Background Information: At the February 1, 2001 Charter Review Committee meeting, staff committed to revise the potential items per the Committee's direction and bring back the items for review as a discussion item at a City Council meeting. Staff has attempted to incorporate the input received into the list of potential items, and has developed election ballot proposition language for review. For the purposes of this discussion, the identified objectives include the following: ■ Proiect Status Review since the February 1, 2001 Charter Review Committee Meeting — Staff has taken the comments received and drafted seven (7) potential ballot propositions for your review. Consistent with your direction, staff has attempted to keep the ballot language simple and reflective of the intent for the proposition (i.e. — consistent with State Law, etc.). The ballot language and the redline strikeout version of the current complete Sections (highlighting the proposed amendments) is included for your review and comment. ■ Discussion of the desire to hold a May 5, 2001 Charter Amendment Election — If there is a desire to proceed in conjunction with the May General Election, the Resolution and Ordinance calling for a Charter Amendment Election would need to be placed on the March 6 City Council Agenda for consideration of the first reading. The first reading would provide one more opportunity for review of the items and the ballot language prior to the consideration of the second reading on March 20. If the May 5 Election date is determined to be the preferred alternative, and should there be a desire to add other propositions to the ballot, the City Attorney has suggested that another Charter Review Committee meeting would be necessary prior to Thursday, March Is'. However, if the items to date are acceptable, most of the legal review is complete (with the exception of some final tweaking). An updated timeline for the legal and election requirements and the decision points for a May 5 Election Date is included for your review and comment. I Billy Campbell, City Manager February 16, 2001 Page 2 ■ Briefing of Public Education Plan timeline for a May 5, 2001 Election - This phase of the project would need further development, but for a May 5 Election, the following components and dates would initially be proposed: 1. Finalization of Election Logistics - March 21 through April 1. 2. Development of Initial Version of Question and Answer Summary - Currently ongoing through March 6. 3. Development of Informational Materials and Presentation_ - Currently ongoing through March 23. 4. Implementation of Public Education Initiatives - March 26 through April 27. Financial Considerations: Holding a May 5, 2001 Charter Amendment Election saves an estimated $10,000. Additional financial considerations include minimal attorney fees to review the verbiage of the propositions, and for the development of changes needed to comply with State Law. Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Charter Review Committee reviewed a list of potential items at their February 1, 2001 meeting. Staff has attempted to incorporate the input received at the meeting into the development of the potential ballot (W propositions. Legal Review: The City Attorneys have reviewed the potential propositions and the ballot language. Debra Drayovich from the City Attorney's Office will also be present at the meeting to address legal issues regarding the Charter Review process. Alternatives: Input towards the discussion as desired. Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: ■ Copy of the list of potential Charter Amendment Election items (redline strikethrough version of the impacted Charter Sections). ■ Copy of the DRAFT ballot proposition language. ■ Copy of the updated summary of the election timeline and decision points for a May 5, 2001 Charter Amendment Election. 0 Copy of the Public Education Plan summary, including target dates. Billy Campbell, City Manager February 16, 2001 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Place as an item for the City Council to review and discuss the potential Charter Amendment Items, and to discuss the potential for holding a Charter Amendment Election on May 5, 2001. 11Av3 Charter Amendment — List of Potential Propositions February 20, 2001 COMMENTS REDLINE VERSION 2.02. Elective Officers. (a) The members of the Council shall be elected and hold office as provided in this Charter. All members of the Council, and the Mayor, shall be elected under the Place system. The Mayor and each member of the Council shall hold office for a three (3) year term. Upon expiration of the terms of the current Mayor and Council members their successors shall be elected for terms as follows: Place 1 and Place 6 shall be elected for a term of two (2) years, beginning with the regular City election held on the first Saturday in May, 1991. Place 2 and the Mayor shall be elected for three (3) year terms, beginning with the regular City election held on the first Saturday in May,1991. Place 3, Place 4, and Place 5 shall be elected to terms of three (3) years, beginning with the regular City election held on the first Saturday in May, 1992. Upon the expiration of the above terms of the Mayor and the Council members, their successors shall be elected for terms of three (3) years. All places, including Mayor, will be elected at large. (b) The Judge of the Municipal court shall be elected fo three (34 year. terms, appointee=°:by the Litt Cgiiicicil #z sereo` a t►, (2)'year. term. The municipal court judge must be a resident of the city. (W 1 • 1y Charter Amendments — List of Potential Propositions 02115101 Page I of 8 Charter Amendment — List of Potential Propositions February 20, 2001 COMMENTS REDLINE VERSION 2.13. Nepotism. "The .Laws" of the State of Texas shall control all matters related to nepotism." 4.01. Administrative Departments. There shall be such administrative departments as are established by this Charter and may be established by ordinance and expecting as otherwise provided in this Charter, these administrative departments shall be under the direction of the City Manager. The Council shall have power by Ordinance to establish administrative departments or offices not herein provided by this Charter. The Council may discontinue, redesignate, or combine and of the departments and/or administrative offices. No changes shall be made by the Council in the organization of the administrative service of the City until the recommendations of the City Manager thereon shall have been heard by the Council. The head of each department shall be a chief, director, or superintendent who shall be appointed by the City Manager subject to the approval of the Council and such chief, director or superintendent shall have and- Coat supervisory:. authority and 'financial control over his department. Two or more departments may be headed by the same individual and the City Manager may head one or more departments. (W I 11A1 Charter Amendments — List of Potential Propositions 02115101 Page 2 of 8 Charter Amendment — List of Potential Propositions February 20, 2001 COMMENTS REDLINE VERSION 5.02. Judge of the Court. The "Judge of the Municipal Court" shall be @1ested-by be appointed by the City. Council. The Judge shall be a resident of this state, be a ; citizen of the United States, " a licensed attorney in good standing, licensed to practice in the State of Texas, and Mayor. and the City Council. The Judge Shall serve for a three- (3) two Q) year'', term. The Council shall fix the compensation for the Judge, the; Judge's salary ni6y not; be collected. the , Judge'. s term ,"of -,Office, and such never be based on the fines assessed or Charter Amendments - List of Potential Propositions 02115101 Page 3 of 8 Charter Amendment — List of Potential Propositions February 20, 2001 COMMENTS REDLINE VERSION 5.04. Absence of Judge. The Council shall appoint an alternate Judge who shall have the same qualifications of Municipal Judge and who shall receive such salary as may be fixed by the Council. In case of the temporary disability or absence of the Judge of the Municipal Court, the alternate Judge shall have authority to act as Judge of said court. The Council shall by appointment fill a vacancy in the office of the Judge for the remainder of the unexpired term. The City Council may appoint, one or 4amr�nranly >ahePnt- Alip. 'tn illnPsc family "rlPath nnntin iinQ nv 7.11. Holding Other Office. No person elected to the Council shall, during the term for which he is elected to the Council, be appointed to any office, position, or employment in the service of the City, and no former member of the Council shall hold any compensated, appointive city office or employment until one year after the expiration of the term for which he is elected to the Council. If any member of the Council shall become a candidate for election to any public office except for re-election to his current place, he shall immediately upon his becoming a candidate forfeit his place on the Council and serve until his successor is elected. If any member of a board or commission appointed by the Council shall become a candidate for election to any public office of the City, he shall immediately upon his becoming a candidate forfeit his place as a member of such board or commission. If any appointive officer of the City shall become a candidate for election to any public office, he shall immediately upon becoming a candidate forfeit the office held within the City. If any employee of the City shall become a candidate for election to any public office of the City of Southlake, he shall immediately upon becoming a candidate, forfeit the employment held within the City. Charter Amendments — List of Potential Propo i 2/15101 Page 4 of 8 Charter Amendment — List of Potential Propositions February 20, 2001 COMMENTS REDLINE VERSION 9.04. Submission. The City Manager shall submit to the Council a proposed budget and accompanying message on or before the €"t fifteenth day of August of each year. The Council shall review the proposed budget and revise it as deemed appropriate prior to the general circulation for public hearing. 11.04. Purpose and Object of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The purpose and object of the Planning and Zoning Commission is to act as an advisory board to the Council in matters designated by ordinance and by state law. Except for matters relating to city parks which are delegated by the Council to another city board with responsibilities relating to city parks, and' fcir ,:matters relating to, the acquisition of the responsibility to review, the Commission shall advise the Council on matters relating the zoning, public improvements, civic improvements, city planning, opening, widening, and changing of streets Lexcluding easem_ ent(s) and, right-oE- Tys ac uisition routing of public utilities, controlling and regulating traffic upon the public streets and ways of the City and such other matters relating to City improvements as the Commission and the Council may deem beneficial to the City. 11.06. The Master Plan. (a) The Planning and Zoning Commission shall formulate and recommend to the Council a Comprehensive Master Plan and shall consult with the City Manager and with other City departments regarding planning. (b) The Master Plan for the physical development of the City shall contain the Commission's recommendations for growth, development and beautification of the City and for City infrastructure necessary to maintain and enhance the health, safety, and welfare of its residents. The Master Plan shall consist of at least these components: 1 114 NO Charter Amendments — List of Potential Propositions 02115101 Page S of 8 Charter Amendment — List of Potential Propositions February 20, 2001 A COMMENTS REDLINE VERSION 11.06. The Master Plan (Continued). (1) Land Use Plan; (2) Thoroughfare Plan (3) Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan; (4) City-wide Trail Master Plan; (5) Water and Wastewater Plan; (6) Storm Water Drainage Plan; and such other components that the Council may designate by ordinance or resolution. Each component of the Master Plan shall address a planning horizon of at least ten (10) years into the future. (c) A copy of the Master Plan, or any part thereof, shall be forwarded to the City Manager, who shall submit it with his recommendations to the Council, which may adopt this plan in whole or in part, and may adopt any amendments thereto after at least one (1) public hearing on the proposed action. (d) The Master Plan components shall be reviewed by the 121anning and Zoning and updated as necessary to reflect changing City conditions and requirements evaq, four. (4) year-6 The rat, Managnr sh-a-1—.be responsible for. scheduling -i�taG�; i accardanca with thi - ro,.,,;..o,,,omt. as directed "by the City Council. Upon.- direction by.- the - City Council; the appopria(e `board shall conduct- -such review and either submit its recommendations for updating the component(s) or shall submit a letter confirming that the review was accomplished but declaring that there was no recommended revisions. 114 dr f Charter Amendments —List of Potential Propositions 02115101 Page 6 of 6 Charter Amendment — List of Potential Propositions February 20, 2001 RJ COMMENTS REDLINE VERSION 11.06. The Master Plan. (Continued) (f) The Council shall act on such plan, or part thereof, within sixty (60) days following its submission. If such plan, or part thereof, shall be rejected by the Council, the Commission may modify such plan or part thereof, and again forward it to the Council for consideration. (g) All amendments to the Master Plan recommended by the Commission shall be submitted to the Council for approval in accordance with the procedures required by this Section 11.06, and all other recommendations affecting the Master Plan shall be accompanied by a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. (W I *4 •a Charter Amendments — List of Potential Propositions 02115101 Page 7 of 8 Charter Amendments — List of Potential Ballot Propositions February 20, 2001 . , PROPOSITION No. 1 — Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to be consistent with State Law with respect to the appointment, qualifications, and salary for the judge of the municipal court of record, the appointment of alternate judge(s) for the municipal court of record, and establishing an appointed term of two (2) years for the judge and alternate judge(s) of the municipal court of record; amending Sections 2.02, 5.02, and 5.04? PROPOSITION No. 2 — Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to be consistent with State Law with respect to nepotism, by repealing Section 2.13 and providing that the current State Law shall apply to the City in respect to nepotism? PROPOSITION No. 3 — Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to clarify the scope of each administrative department head to exercise supervisory authority and financial control of the department, amending Section 4.01? PROPOSITION No. 4 — Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to be consistent with State Law with respect to elected officials serving in office until their successor is elected, amending Section 7.11? PROPOSITION No. 5 — Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to provide that the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a proposed budget and accompanying message on or before August fifteenth, amending Section 9.04? PROPOSITION No. 6 — Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to clarify the right of the City Council to retain the responsibility to review the matters relating to the acquisition of easements and right-of-ways, amending Section 11.04? PROPOSITION No. 7 — Shall the Charter of the City of Southlake be amended to provide for the content and procedures for the updating of the City's Master Plan; amending Section 11.06? (W 11*4 # // Charter Amendments —List of Potential Ballot Propositions 02/16/01 Page I of 1 Charter Amendment Election May 5, 2001 1. March 5 — City Council approval of a resolution calling Special Charter Amendment Election. Naming Election Judge; Authorizing the City Secretary to submit a pre- clearance approval to the U.S. Department of Justice; designating early voting hours; election day and early voting locations; all procedures used in election. NOTE: The proposal would combine consideration of the Resolution and the Ordinance on one (1) agenda item. March 5 — City Council approval of Ordinance No. , 1st Reading, calling Charter Amendment Election (ordinance must include propositions to be placed on the ballot). 2. March 20 — City Council approval of Ordinance No. , 2nd Reading, calling Charter Amendment Election (ordinance must list propositions to be placed on the ballot, including the language that will appear on the ballot). 3. Early Voting to be held beginning April 18th and ending on May 1st. Hours and additional voting dates to be determined by the City Secretary. 4. Election Day — May 5. 5. Official Canvass of the election to be held on May 8cn DECISION POINTS ■ Amendments to be placed on the ballot. ■ Can Charter Review Committee work fast enough to get propositions prepared prior to March 5? ■ If there is a desire to add any propositions to an election ballot, the City Attorney and Staff suggest that another Charter Review Committee meeting be held prior to March 1, 2001— is this a necessary step in the process? ■ Does the Charter Review Committee wish to include this election with the general City Elections? `"- 1104` 4 Charter Amendment Election Timelines 02/15/01 4:42 PM Page 1 of 4 B. Process post -approval Ordinance requirements —March 7 through March Ls- C. Order Election Ballots - March 21 3. Development of Plan. Items. A. Identification of Communication Points and finalize schedule — February 21 through March 5. B. Development of Question and Answer Summary - In progress through March 9. LOT 5 BLOCK B COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK 0 50 100 200 300 400 / / 4 LOT 5R2;, GRAPHIC SCALE o� / j THOMAS EASTEF�"NO. 474 SCALE 1' s 100' / m CAB. A SLIDE 4900 Q Hl CIO N / LEGAL DESCRIPTION "v ZONED SP-2 (APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN) / L.U.D. R XIL COMMERCIAL if POINT OF BEGINNING / 124.4 ' / TXDOT MON. S O'12'35" E 274.37' S 00'30' 1" E GATEWAY PLAZA ADDITION / POKUNAIL X FOUND CAB. A SLIDE 5365 & 5366 / FOUND UTILITY EASEMENT I 10' UTILITY SEMENT` 1 / CAB. A SLID 4010 ZONED AG .D. RAIL COMµtgAL ii LO CIV / n / _3/ S 70*47#1j## DOT MO 40 I / / 9.74'-cis., \ �'F� W I / �� . / TXDOT MON. FOUND / �•�` � :W,`E� � �. if >l, v LOT a) / Q' 159,640 SQ. FT. ? ,.'. N OR 3.66 ACRES. „_• �\ /s ccpp ►, c� O / ZONED AG // APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT '1 j L.U.D. RETAIL COMMERCIAL \ LOT 1 BLOCK 1 O ,j GATEWAY PLAZA ADDITION`` PHASE II 1! / 94.4 ' _ �_s=53,. 1 In 32" E 137.99 502 W , / g'47 14 9. ss Qv �- IRON ROD / TXDOT MON. tb / / ~'` SE' T / �� FOUND / S � w l m ° z o4 LOT 4 THOMAS EASTER NO. 474 CAB. A SLIDE 4123 ZONED SP-2 (APPROVED SITE PLAN) L.U.D. INDUSTRIAL VOL. 388-214 PAGE 60 PRTCT ZONED 1-1 L.U.D. INDUSTRIAL i 3 21 2 5 � LOT 3 LOT 5 / :o CO / BLOCK 5 M BLOCK 5 ZONED I-1 z L.U.D. INDUSTRIAL ZONED 1-1 /ai z n L.U.D. INDUSTRIAL zoa� w3m / w�aa � - } J w 2 _j - - LOT 4 V) ' <QQ LOT 2R1 , - - \ BLOCK 5 tp Qao:m a BLOCK 5 ir¢�r M 0 0 0 m \ NED 1-1 Go ^ \ \\moo' L.U.D. INDUSTRIAL Z CORNERSTONE BUSINESS PARK I I CAB, A SLIDE 6339 ZONED 01 j PF�-7i L.U.D. OFFICE COMMERCIAL �' 1°\ \ 1, LOT 1 c \ `o• \ o BLOCK 5 ZONED 01 > !y RO L.U.D. OFFICE COMMERCIAL / � S 47'18'50" W \ o. 4 `- } INN �., •� f` 40.00' T DOT M XDOT N: S O S41'48'01"W ca OUND • r rr OUNq, N ,,`/ r '`ll ��' \ 31.06 / �o / 61e / �° \°�c o / 73 38 57 E // / �, cv \ /°o i/ -t \ \ c'\ / / `' ` / / �P / `y / 100.12 / / _y ►`� s �� ",. ' / /IRON oD / / ROGER GLENN WILLIAMS 377 o/ °� / / M1 • ' 'r / "I ROGER RETAIL ' 3 j• 1 .s� Q� / �OUND 58 02 59 E / „ VOL. 11862 PAGE 1685 DRCTC 1�S 'Al / \ �F / £ < r lip42.15' ou �� ` j ` I in J S 00'22 42 W 4.05' y . LOT 2 I 50.44' \9"� =J 174,320 SQ. FT J O TXDOT MON. /- �2'4g • fr� j 4.00 ACRES / FOUND r4\?�8.43'� Wliv�� C\Ek� i BLOCK A I,`= ZONED AG \�•j TXDOT MON. \ .�� ' L.U.D. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOUND �,� r r rr � s� �� -, � .3� I" IRON ROD 40.65'8 36 W°'�'3 1:' oI FOUND J 1Z LOT 1..`.' I 3 82,225 SQ. FT. t' 1.89 ACRES h �, I� OzF� R00 FOVN L.U.D. RETAILCOMMERCIAL '`I N66 ip r " D=19'08'02" r " , mot.00 00 S� Rpp� 64'12 48 E R=365.00' D _ 24'14 05 F4�� c� R 365.00 00 1/2-IRON / 4.14 t_=12t ss' � � � J ROD SET . DO 154.3g' 1 2" IRON / p )� ROD SET v� T=61.52 ,�, to SO BvDINC � G/l N £ o J A. LOT 2 BLOCK 2 1/2" IRON GATEWAY PLAZA AD ITION� ROD FOUND PHASE II UNIT CAB. A SLIDES 6093 6095 // J TXDOT MON. FOUN TXDOT MON. FOUN %�� 53.2 CD=SO9'38'47" 1N `�tT`1 '17" o 4 1/2 30' BUILDING LIN �.,IE - IRONI �',,... 32.17' m � \�c4 1 IRON S� 9g••w ^� �S_ -- 1/R80-S�� -104. \+%9-7'�AD sE� / / ROD �N N 1 IRON--�?4' D SET 275.0877"' • ' tt 150.03' N 00 04 46 E 165.34 ;, �3p24g•• M R _ 400.00 -" S 0065.34' W • R s 400.00' 24' E 133.58' L = 26 1/2" IRON ROD SET 1/2" IRON . r tt 1/2" IRON / N25'47'12"W ROD SET N00 04 46 E ROD SET 14.14' 165.34' D=20'13'13" ° ry D=19'08'02" R=435.00' D= ca R=435.00' L=153.52' R= T=77.56' L= L=145.27' LC=152.72' T=1 T= 73.32' CD=N10'01'51"W s- p 1/2- IRON ROD SET `D=17'13'44" R=435.00' L=130.80' T=65.90' LC=130.31' CD=N28'45'19"W VERALL 37'26'56" 435.00' 284.32' 47.45' LC=279.29 C D=N0909*38'47"E = CD=N18'38'42"W ' ai to 0 EMILY SHANKLIN VOL. 8718 PAGE 746 DRTCT N 3 t6 r` N a) ROGER GLENN WILLIAMS ;0 VOL. 11862 PAGE 1685 DRCTC rn 00 a ZONED AG LOT 4, BLOCK 1 L.U.D. RETAIL COMMERCIAL 166,105 SO. FT. GEORGETOWN PARK CAB. A SLIDE 4216 PRTCT W ZONED C2 (APPROVED SITE PLAN) L.U.D. RETAIL COMMERCIAL N ZONED AG rn L.U.D. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL t7 01 00 Z BOUNDARY LINE DIMENSIONS NUMBER DIRECTION DISTANCE L1 N 71'41'02" W 79.71' L2 N 41'55155" W 19.84' L3 S 87*13'30" W 27.37' L4 N 54*00"02" E 37.23' L5 N 35'59'58" W 18.29' 14,920 S0. FT, S'9 SFTti �o. �� /1/2".D ON ROD p\\ \ S87'47'05"E �! % \ 12.74' \ .5ti 28"W \ � � �9.52' � y \ \ r3Dc0 �1/2 IR ROD IRON LOT 1 ROD ET BLOCK 3 \ \ ONED 01 (APPROVED SITE PLAN) \ \ LL o �'L.U.D.OFFICE COMMERCIAL � L.0 � Vol, N05'00'09"E 14, 78' s \ \ / / LOTS 2R AND 3R CORNERSTONE A / / BUSINESS PARK CAB. A SLIDE 5364 \ \ LOT 2R \ BLOCK 3 \ ZONED 01 E.C. WHITE \ L.U.D. OFFICE COMMERCIAL VOL. 7525 PAGE 2266 DRTCT �19 \ 00. S 51'48'50" W 75.20' QUANTITATIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE Phase Existing Existing Froposed Number Gross Density - DU Open Space Land Use Zoning Zoning of Units Acreage /Gross Acre Area % 1 Residential or vacant AG SP-2/C3 3 Lots 9.55 ac. NA NA \\ S 38'48'50" W 69.10' S S¢ � 8S�60•. .40 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING 9.5543 acres out of the THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474 in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all of LOT 2R2, Block 5 of LOTS 2R1 AND 2R2, BLOCK 5, CORNERSTONE BUSINESS PARK, an addition to the city of Southlake, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide xxxx, of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas and all of the tract conveyed to Southlake Cornerstone Business Park by deed recorded in Volume 12873, Page 522 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of the tracts to John R. Demlow, etux Carol G., Barbara Jo Gordon, and Michael P. Sathre, etux Leah by deeds recorded in Volume 9275, Page 1926, Volume 6843, Page 1181, and Volume 12944, page 455 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and a potion of Crooked Lane to be abandoned, some property being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; BEGINNING at a TXDOT monument found at the intersection of the south right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709) (having a variable width right-of-way) with the easterly right-of-way line of Crooked Lane (having a variable width right-of-way), the same point being the northwest corner of Lot 5R2 of THOMAS EASTER NO. 474 ADDITION, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4900 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 12 minutes 35 seconds East along the east line of the above mentioned Lot 5R2 for a distance of 274.37 feet to a railroad rail found for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 30 minutes 21 seconds East continuing along the said east line of Lot 5R2 for a distance of 81.47 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 5R2, the some point being the northeast comer of the above mentioned Lot 2R1, Block 5, and continuing along the same line for a total distance of 124.40 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner at the southeast corner of said Lot 2R1; THENCE along the southerly line of said Lot 2R1 the following courses; North 73 degrees 59 minutes 37 seconds West for a distance of 198.43 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; North 85 degrees 37 minutes 56 seconds West for a distance of 131.46 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found for corner; North 71 degrees 41 minutes 02 seconds West for a distance of 79.71 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner in the east right-of-way line Crooked Lane; THENCE North 41 degrees 55 minutes 55 seconds West for a distance of 19.84 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner; THENCE South 87 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds West for a distance of 27.37 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner, THENCE North 54 degrees 00 minutes 02 seconds East for a distance of 37.23 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner, THENCE North 35 degrees 59 minutes 58 seconds West for a distance of 18.29 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 44 minutes 56 seconds West for a distance of 332.75 feet to a 1 inch iron found for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54 seconds West for a distance of 182.83 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner in the east right-of-way line of South Nolen Drive as dedicated by SOUTH NOLEN DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas, according to plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide xxxx, of the Piet Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE in a northerly direction along the said easterly right-of-way of South Nolen Drive the following courses; Along a curve to the right having a central angle of 24 degrees 14 minutes 05 seconds, a radius of 365.00, a tangent distance of 78.37 feet , and a chord distance of North 12 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds west, 153.24 feet, through an arc distance of 154.39 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner; North 00 degrees 04 minutes 46 seconds East for a distance of 165.34 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner at the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 19egrees 08 minutes 02 seconds, a radius of 365.00, a tangent distance of 61.52 feet , and a chord distance of North 09 degrees 38 minutes 47 seconds west, 121.36 feet; In a northeasterly direction along said curve to the right through an arc distance of 121.89 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner; North 19 degrees 12 minutes 48 seconds East for a distance of 130.24 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner at the south end of a 10 foot by 10 foot corner clip at the intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of South Nolen Drive with the southerly right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709); NOTES : 1. SELLING A PORTION OF ANY LOT WTHIN THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF STATE LAW AND CITY ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND BUILDING PERMITS. 2. THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS ON ANY LOT CONTAINED WITHIN THIS ADDITION. THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THE PLAT IS FILED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ADDITIONAL LOTS, OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN, MAY BE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR CRITERIA. 3. THE OWNERS OF ALL CORNER LOTS SHALL MAINTAIN SIGHT TRI- ANGLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. 4. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SOUTHLAKE PER TXDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAPS AND DEEDS. 5. ALL IRON ROD SET ARE 1/2* IRON RODS WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "JDJR". s h NO >>4 r E SOocgk SITE FB OUCf �qRO J a m o� Z Z m 0 < 20d Z f� N 0 Z LOCATION MAP THENCE North 64 degrees 12 minutes 48 seconds East along said corner clip for a distance of 14.14 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for corner in the southerly right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709); THENCE along the said southerly right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. No. 1709) for the following courses; South 70 degrees 47 minutes 12 seconds East for a distance of 169.95 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner; South 59 degrees 28 minutes 36 seconds East for a distance of 40.65 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner, South 00 degrees 22 minutes 42 seconds West for a distance of 50.44 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner; South 58 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds East for a distance of 42.15 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner; South 73 degrees 38 minutes 57 seconds East for a distance of 100.12 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner; South 86 degrees 40 minutes 23 seconds East for a distance of 111.10 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner; South 76 degrees 29 minutes 50 seconds East for a distance of 297.36 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner; South 70 degrees 47 minutes 12 seconds East for a distance of 9.74 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner; South 72 degrees 39 minutes 22 seconds East for a distance of 169.95 feet to a TXDOT monument found for corner at the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 00 degrees 51 minutes 51 seconds, a radius of 1974.86, a tangent distance of 14.89 feet, and a chord distance of South 74 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds East, 29.79 feet; Along said curve to the left for an arc distance of 29.79 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING a computed area of 416,185 square feet or 9.5543 acres of land. PRELIMINARY PLAT CORNERSTONE PLAZA AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRAN T COUNTY, TEXAS 9.55 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474 THERE ARE A TOTAL OF THREE (3) LOTS INCLUDED IN THIS PLAT. DECEMBER 2000 SCALE : 1 "=100' OWNER/APPLICANT: RECI) J N 2 2 2001 CONTACT: MAX KRUGLER SHEET 1 OF 1 D = 19'08'02" R = 365.00' L = 121.89' T = 61.52' LC = 121.33' CD = N 09'38'47" E U 0 z� J d. z Z Q C!) In Q r 0- J L0 Ld w00 0 IZONED AG U.D. RETAIL COMMERCIAL D = 24*14'05" R = 365.00' L = 154.39' T = 78.36' LC = 153.24' CD = N 12.02'17" W �z 6 72' //:.....:.:.. 6 4'12' 48" W /14.14', / \w cO 5 a � . fi `a sT3' y 42.15' �F wx oN 58 0259W q RKwq Y 4 3S RI CN� ' �3•8 Exls �X 5 BL DRVVE wq Y,� 0 f 1 w l T 9) 86'40' „ OR � E GLEN SCOTT HARRELL, ET AL VOL. 12-740 PAGE 498 PROP01 pECE f Rq TION CqN f DONALD PERRY ET UX MARTHA VOL. 7159 PAGE 55 GREGORY P. WOODSIDE ET UX LYNN VOL. 11258 PAGE 1973 04J O fl� MATT LEIGHTON ET UX LORETTA N Q VOL. 8663 PAGE 1791 ass DRi \� ;III \ eUF�E 95 S S9• e \� 4 RYgRp 0 26,, l D v 9 $ N 00•22 OP e } 50.44' GATEWAY PLAZA ADDITION CAB. A SLIDE 5365 & 5366 ZONED SP2 (APPROVED SITE PLAN) L.U.D. MIXED USE < v 00 51 51 t / s l'q w� \ 12>> E DRI R — 4.86' x 13 / o _ YN 76.2 ,�-9,74, 3d C L = 29.79' M fi u{ a J � 4 s c 24 #„,'. q i � ", 43 21 � / 1? � LOT 1 0 O s --- / / 7 LOT LINE 5 —�� — � �p 7' SFIRELANE TACK � � ZONED AG L.U.D. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ROGER GLENN WILLIAMS VOL. 11862 PAGE 1685 DRCTC LOT 2 \ � 24' FIRi=LANE 10'x5O' LOADING SPACE Y 10 ��■■® O■ 1 DRIVEWAY CHART DRIVEWAY TYPE STACKING STACKING VARIANCE REQUEST SPACING SPACING VARIANCE REQUEST A FULL 75' 25' 367' TO INTERSECTION NONE B FULL 100' NONE 437' TO INTERSECTION 63' C FULL 100' NONE B TO C SPACING = 354' 146' D EXISTING RI/RO NA NA C TO D SPACING = 337' NONE E EXISTING NA NA C TO E SPACING = 594' NONE ROGER GLENN WILLIAMS VOL. 11862 PAGE 1685 DRCTC ZONED AG L.U.D. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0' 25' 50' 100' 150' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE LOCATION MAP NOTES: 1. ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 2. ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS (NON —IMPERVIOUS AREAS) ARE SHOWN SHADED. 3. ALL DRIVES SHOWN HEREON ARE A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET IN WIDTH. 4. ALL PARKING STALLS SHOWN HEREON ARE 9' x 18' (EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES). 5. ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THIS TRACT IS CURRENTLY ZONED AG (AGRICULTURE). SQ�� T = 14.89 5 \ 297 36, w \ LC = 29.79' avF� 337'� CD = S 74'57'27" E ERygRD �' O C D=07' 35' 25' ' TQ R=1974.86' g` S 6 15 DRIVE T=131.00' � / / 72.39, D LC-261.43' CD=S 79'13'41" E r_ 3 ^-10 / 12 FR �VFF Y Ipco IT/ qR0 t saF G D 5Lo w , 12 3' ash a TLjJ / 5 ® � I Q IBUILDING F 4,900 S.F. STORY NV Q i v / r \\ In LOT 3 7 13 10 — W —_ z— � 7 FF� p / ' 24' FIRELANE E f, } 1 D'x$0 LO ri e 4 a t� N 54'00'02" E ADING SPACE F r r L 4 c 37.23' S 7.13-30" W 24' F,RE�gNE 27.37' EXIS / / 71 •4'TtNG DRAIn�gGE WA,( 02 P, N 41. 5'55„ W 7g 7/, w ,1 19.84' N 85'37'56.. W 131.48' LOT 2R2 zoNED 01 // �I BLOCK 5 L.U.D. OFFICE COMMERCIAL 7,3 49 7 '' '3 CAB. A SLIDE XXXX SITE DATA TABULATION LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 OVERALL EXISTING ZONING AG AG AG/01 AG/01 PROPOSED ZONING SP-2/C3 (LIMITED) SP-2/C3 (LIMITED) SP-2/C3 (LIMITED) SP-2/C3 (LIMITED) LAND USE DESIGNATION (L.U.D.) RETAIL COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL TOTAL LOT AREA 82,225 SF 174,320 159,640 416,185 SF TOTAL BUILDING AREA 14,490 SF 31,650 SF 26,400 SF 72,540 SF PROPOSED USES RETAIL — 14,490 SF RETAIL — 21,650 SF RESTAURANT — 10,000 SF (360 SEATS) RETAIL — 15,000 SF RESTAURANT — 11,400 SF (350 SEATS) RETAIL — 51,140 SF RESTAURANT — 21,400 SF (710 SEATS) IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (ON —SITE) 60,179 SF (73.2%) 136,314 SF (78.2%) 120,003 SF (75.2%) 316,496 SF (76.0%) EXCESS PARKWAY 2,942 SF 11,448 SF 2,879 SF 17,269 SF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (EFFECTIVE) 70.7% 73.4% 73.8% 73.0% REQUIRED PARKING 73 SPACES 21,650/200 + 357/3 = 227 SPACES 15,000/200 + 350/3 = 192 SPACES 51,140/200 + 710/3 = 492 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING 73 SPACES 227 SPACES 192 SPACES 492 SPACES CORNERSTONE PLAZA USE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR "S—P-2" ZONING PERMITTED USES DR/ D (EXISTING 240'f DRIVE p To DRIVE E ZONED SP-2 (APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN) L.U.D. RETAIL COMMERCIAL 4000 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING ONE STORY RESTAURANT RETAIL 8,466 S.F. 140 SEAT This site shall permit all "C-3" General Commercial District uses according to Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 22, with the exception of the following deleted uses: 1. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas; 2. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto; 3. Lodges, sororities and / or fraternities; 4. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: This property shall be subject to the development regulations of the "C-3" General Commercial District, Section 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, and all other applicable regulations of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, with the following exceptions: 1. Maximum impervious coverage required: 769a Provided: 78.5% on a per lot basis, provided the overall site does not exceed 767; 2. Bufferyards along lot lines internal to the development shall not be required. EXISTING BUILDING LOT 4 THOMAS EASTER NO. 474 CAB. A SLIDE 4123 z 0 J 0 coC7 Z F— X W oL 0 ZONED SP-2 (APPROVED SITE PLAN) L.U.D. INDUSTRIAL o/o DRIVE E (EXISTING) CONCEPT PLAN LOTS 1, 29 & 3, BLOCK A CORNERSTONE PLAZA 9.55 ACRES OUT OF THE TH OM AS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRAN T COUNTY, TEXAS DECEMBER 2000 Wr'D A N` 2001 SCALE 1 "=50' OWNER/APPLICANT: CASE NO. ZA 00-140 PAR-3 PROPERTIES, LLC. 2810 MARKET LOOP SUITE 100 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 TEL: 817-999-5336 FAX: 817-416-0024 CONTACT: MAX KRUGLER DJ RENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS, ... INC. ENGINEERS • LAND PLANNERS • CAD DESIGNS 2505 Texas Drive Suite 109 Irving, Texas 75062 Tel 972-252-5357 (JDJR) Fax 972-273-8860 SHEET 1 OF 1 6 72, 6 4*12' 48„ W GLEN SCOTT HARRELL, ET AL VOL. 12740 PAGE 498 PR0p0SE0 DECE tERA 7'_ CgNF DONALD PERRY ET UX MARTHA VOL. 7159 PAGE 55 ` GREGORY P. WOODSIDE ET UX LYNN \ VOL. 11258 PAGE 1973 O N s C) 11f MATT LEIGHTON ET UX LORETTA %4!,J2, 43�, OIJ Q VOL. 8663 PAGE 1791 ass evFFE • g5 S S9• � Q �\ / / l v 9 $ N Oo•22"42" 30' k s r 1P 50.44 D = 19.08'02" / iVgR/� x cr R = 365.00_ N 58'02'59" W FXST 3a N' w L= 121.89 a 42.15 EXOEs Rip l w/0�w o 1 ypgRKwq 35 R�G� • • LC 121.33eh \ ? Exls . 75 'x . — 4 OFF w CD = N 09'38'47" E x Y 3 3g07,, _ e 09) 00 1 R U 0 Z(0 J d Y � LLJ Z Q CD r 0- J 00 W 00 J 0 IZONED AG U.D. RETAIL COMMERCIAL D = 24*14'05" R = 365.00' L = 154.39' T = 78.36' LC = 153.24' CD = N 12*02'17" W WN ZONED AG L.U.D. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ROGER GLENN WILLIAMS VOL. 11862 PAGE 1685 DRCTC GATEWAY PLAZA ADDITION CAB. A SLIDE 5365 & 5366 ZONED SP2 (APPROVED SITE PLAN) L.U.D. MIXED USE 2 S 86 40 ,. EVE �A k 111. ' Ekc S_ p. — / / ESs 4> >2�, R = 4.86 T y p tx fi qRk� 4 Y 9 F RI vt C = v /13 ' N 76.29, L 29.79 , a 2 ` } y , 0 24 / y\ Y 21 LOT PR o a� 7 LOT LINE �p 75' STACK FIRELANE • 3 / 15 LOT 2 i S 89'42'54" W N, 182.83' S 89'44'56" W BUFFERYARD A DRIVEWAY CHART DRIVEWAY TYPE STACKING STACKING VARIANCE REQUEST SPACING SPACING VARIANCE REQUEST A FULL 75' 25' 367' TO INTERSECTION NONE B FULL 100' NONE 437' TO INTERSECTION 63' C FULL 100' NONE B TO C SPACING = 354' 146' D EXISTING RI/RO NA NA C TO D SPACING = 337' NONE E EXISTING NA NA C TO E SPACING = 594' NONE ROGER GLENN WILLIAMS VOL. 11862 PAGE 1685 DRCTC 10'x5O' LOADING SPACE 131 191 332.75' ZONED AG L.U.D. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0' 25' 50' 100' 150' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE LOCATION MAP NOTES: 1. ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 2. ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS (NON —IMPERVIOUS AREAS) ARE SHOWN SHADED. 3. ALL DRIVES SHOWN HEREON ARE A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET IN WIDTH. 4. ALL PARKING STALLS SHOWN HEREON ARE 9' x 18' (EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES). 5. ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THIS TRACT IS CURRENTLY ZONED AG (AGRICULTURE). 50p, T = 14.89 5 �- 297 36, w LC = 29.79' - --,_ BVFFERygR 33�� CD = S 74'57'27" E p \ 0 0 .,►u.,� D=07' 35' 25' C ro R=1974.86' �` S ORIVE T=131.00' ' � LC=261.43' CD=S 79'13'41" E 10 / / 12 QvFFERYq 0 Of p W x 12 5 ,d s�z';wa 13 t� I Q I BUILDING F 4,900 S.F. kd 4 ySTORY '� i� � �. E•# � �.��-� �':<� tom—'}; LOT 3 W 13 10 7 z� �24' FIRELANE Rg 4 I 3�Ff q#Y 3 4 3 V v44 tg1 d t. a.A_Nr:ixah` 9'X°*� y Ask riae rim" s. M.° } -fi �%, ""S_,,.�•X �i�,y,��q wit ss,. `, „ 10 x5O LIN OAD` ,�' r',y J, •+�- : , ` "'`- a ' " ; f z N 54 00 02 E G SPACE E o,z 37.23' S 7.13-30" W, 24' FIRE 27.37 — __. ex,sgNE —�� o-_ F TINGG DRAIN 71'4� 0 — AGE WAY 2 �, N 415'55" W 719.71 * W 11 19.84' N 85'37'56.. W 131.48' LOT 2R2 ZONED 01 BUFFS/ BLOCK 5 L.U.D. OFFICE COMMERCIAL 73'Sg '3 1g8.43' w CAB. A SLIDE XXXX SITE DATA TABULATION LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 OVERALL EXISTING ZONING AG AG AG/01 AG/01 PROPOSED ZONING SP-2/C3 (LIMITED) SP-2/C3 (LIMITED) SP-2/C3 (LIMITED) SP-2/C3 (LIMITED) LAND USE DESIGNATION (L.U.D.) RETAIL COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL TOTAL LOT AREA 82,225 SF 174,320 159,640 416,185 SF TOTAL BUILDING AREA 14,490 SF 31,650 SF 26,400 SF 72,540 SF PROPOSED USES RETAIL — 14,490 SF RETAIL — 21,650 SF RESTAURANT — 10,000 SF (360 SEATS) RETAIL — 15,000 SF RESTAURANT — 11,400 SF (350 SEATS) RETAIL — 51,140 SF RESTAURANT — 21,400 SF (710 SEATS) IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (ON —SITE) 60,179 SF (73.2%) 136,314 SF (78.2%) 120,003 SF (75.2%) 316,496 SF (76.0%) EXCESS PARKWAY 2,942 SF 11,448 SF 2,879 SF 17,269 SF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (EFFECTIVE) 70.7% 73.4% 73.8% 73.0% REQUIRED PARKING 73 SPACES 21,650/200 + 357/3 = 227 SPACES 15,000/200 + 350/3 = 192 SPACES 51,140/200 + 710/3 = 492 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING _F 73 SPACES 227 SPACES 192 SPACES 492 SPACES CORNERSTONE PLAZA E USE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR "S—P-2" ZONING PERMITTED USES DRI VE D (EXISTING) 240'f DRIVE p 70 DRIVE E ZONED SP-2 (APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN) L.U.D. RETAIL COMMERCIAL Ir3�0110�� 4000 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING ONE STORY RESTAURANT RETAIL 8,466 S.F. 140 SEAT This site shall permit all "C-3" General Commercial District uses according to Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 22, with the exception of the following deleted uses: 1. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas; 2. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto; 3. Lodges, sororities and / or fraternities; 4. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: This property shall be subject to the development regulations of the "C-3" General Commercial District, Section 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, and all other applicable regulations of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, with the following exceptions: 1. Maximum impervious coverage required: 7675; Provided: 78.5% on a per lot basis, provided the overall site does not exceed 767.; 2. Bufferyards along lot lines internal to the development shall not be required. EXISTING BUILDING LOT 4 THOMAS EASTER NO. 474 CAB. A SLIDE 4123 0 z 0 m V Z X W oL 0 ZONED SP-2 (APPROVED SITE PLAN) L.U.D. INDUSTRIAL oho J m z X W DRIVE E (EXISTING) CONCEPT PLAN LOTS 1, 29 & 39 BLOCK A CORNERSTONE PLAZA 9.55 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRAN T COUNTY, TEXAS DECEMBER 2000 Wr'D $�`� ` 2Q01 SCALE 1 "=50' OWNER/APPLICANT: CASE NO. ZA 00-140 PAR-3 PROPERTIES, LLC. 2810 MARKET LOOP SUITE 100 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 TEL: 817-999-5336 FAX: 817-416-0024 CONTACT: MAX KRUGLER DJ RENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS, ... INC. ENGINEERS • LAND PLANNERS • CAD DESIGNS 2505 Texas Drive Suite 109 Irving, Texas 7$010 Tel 972-252-5357 (JDJR) Fax 972-273-8860 SHEET 1 OF 1 r W' r Za 0 0 0 0 N w ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED /N THE F. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 511, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING LOT 2, BLOCK 1 OF THE EMERALD ESTATES SOUTH SUBDIVISION, FILED APRIL 27, 1984, RECORDED UNDER PLAT RECORD VOLUME 388-171, PAGE 99, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (P. R. T C. T.) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEVANIMYG AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF THE EMERALD ESTATES SOUTH SUBDIVISION AND BEING SOUTH 59 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 133. 11 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR DOVE ROAD AND NORTH CARROLL AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF THE EMERALD ESTATES SOUTH SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 422.08 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 547.29 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 317.63 FEET,• THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 880.98 FEET,• TWVCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 271.89 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE ROAD, TF04CE NORTH 67 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE ROAD A DISTANCE OF 32.69 FEET,• � TM?" NORTH 69 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE �� USE �� Ra4D A DISTANCE OF 100.0-1 FEET; LAND USE: A/EDIUM DENSm' RESVENnk THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE TOTAL ACREAGE: 9.06? Acres TOTAL A' ZONING: .0 ROAD A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL a IO iAkl- 1A ANGLE OF 20 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 59 SECONDS, A RADIUS OF 887.42 FEET, A TANGENT LENGTH TOTAL / LOT' 7 %� � � OF 163.14 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 78 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST A GRAPHIC SCALE TOTAL / DWELLING UNITS. 7 DISTANCE OF 320.90 FEET; GROSS DWELLING UNnS/ACRE: 0.773 Units/Acro 300 FEET \ v I 60, Tp&L. ELEC7W ESMT. ACREAGE., 0.737 Aaros \1 � I I i THENCE IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE 0 60 120 180 240 NET ACREAGE- 8.325 Acres A DISTANCE OF 322.67 FEET 1 p , Tt+lOYCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE SCALE = 1 " = 60' ROAD A DISTANCE OF 649.74 TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 30 SECONDS, A RADIUS OF 555.66 FEET, A TANGENT LENGTH OF 120.01 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 74 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST A w I DISTANCE OF 234.61 FEET A PRELIMINARY PLAT VICINITY MAP b j 1 THENCE IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE 1 ROAD A DISTANCE OF 236.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 9.062 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. O F \`UJI Iv ,--5138--------- 1owlI THE LAKES ON DOVE / I• 1 .. 1 ; ` I 'i �� 1 i ' `•�' I JANUARY 2001 LOT 6, BLOCK 2 / LOT 12, BLOCK 2 1 CV;,� ; 9.062 ACRES / 7 LOTS EMERALD ESTATES / EMERALD ESTATES �, �/ '' 4 1 ,�1 t VOL. 388-165, PG. 48, PRTCT/ VOL. 388-165, PG. 48, PRTCT \�I11�11'I I { ZONED' SF1-A \� ��. ,__/ / / I 1 OUT OF THE 1 �\ ' /1 I // 101 I I F. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 511 LOW DENSITY ♦�\ / / 111111 I RESIDENTIAL �� \� t Illy 1 I N.E. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1563 _->-- —"�—�----- — ----_— ' ----- s �= CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I��• 1 �� `t �* IN THE { 1111 t { ,-, �— — �, L _ N { I I 1 II 131.41 54Q. 729 / �� -- 'C �- ''58� - - - - - - - DEVELOPER: ALLEGHENY LAND COMPANY II i �� 132.10 I-� ` -----� —--------- 17480 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 110 I I I ` 132.10' � _' _ TEXAS 75287 2__�_:�-� Woo 7-/LITY_ S ivT — — — — - -- DALLAS, ________-'`\ (972) 248-8155 / MR. DOUGLAS A. TA U I I 1 I' I h o� III I I I I I 11 { 1 ` , I �J•J�6II ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINE ERS, INC.ENGINEER: 2445 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD., SUITE 100 V � PROPOSED D41NAGEASEMENT o III __----SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 �L � � (817) 329-69901 11 �11� �-"--� �' � � PROPOSED DEEN N POD � ,1 ) �MR. ROB ADAMS I 1 � -------- �. OWNER: FRANK STANLEY SHELBY N 1211 E. DOVE STREET 0; -- — _ SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 to Lk // Z ZONED SF1-A i a �„� / LOT 2, BLOCK 4 LOW DENSITY T 4, BLOCK 4 LOT 5, BLOCK 4 LOT 6, BLOCK 4 LOT 7, BLOCK 4 I 60' ELECTRIC SE NT • V / HERALD ESTATES EMERALD ESTATES EMERALD ESTATES EMERALD ESTATES 1 f 1 � I o TEXAS POWER LI HT EMERALD ESTATES VOL. 8-165, PG. 48, PRTCT VOL. 388- 165, PG. 48, PRTCT VOL. 388-165, PG. 48, PRTCT VOL. 388-165, PG. 48, PRTCT \ (n VOL. 388-165, PG. 48, PRTCT RESIDENTIAL 1 I I I I i I I VOL. 6853, 1 70 \ 1 LOT 1, 81OCK 4 O EM£RALLY ESTATES LOT 3, BLOCK 4 I BLOCK 1 -\ VOL. 388-161, PG. 48, PRTCT VOL. 388E 16 ,RALD ESTATES PG. 48, PRTCTui I _ ZONED O 1 I MEDIUM DENSITY 1 � 'd �` N% i 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT S 88 40 A - 880 98 50' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT Ij ,QESIDENTIAL 58.911.36 SF j /�&r 993.98 SF _ -�—---*----- I I 2 3 , _ 348.62' 61,413.32 SF 61,279.29 SF 349.84' 182.53 ----� LOT 2 1 I I PROPOSED 15' DRA AGE & UTILITY EASEMENT P.O.B. _ ( III o a III `\ 9.062 Acres ,�i .LOCK 1 /�----��' �� EXISTING ONING _ AG N III V) III )VERALD ESTATES SOUTH vl `��'� LOT FRONTAGE / �' / o `� 1 I ♦ PROPOSED Z NING = SF-1A �w o II I o III VOL. *488-171, PG. 99, PRTCT ��, o I 1 LOW DENSIT RESIDENTIAL III z I t I 5 \ �I I W`:�� t / /'I• I �' I I I IAd U W ti III \ LOT FRONTAGE I W I / � 49,036.45 SF ♦ o U I �� --_ i / o III 5s,53s.7�SF �•-�40 DR.9/,V,�G, cV �`---------- ---- Q �� - - I---35'SETQACK---------- �� Q L--- / /' / II coo W III 2 / / / e� r ary0�� 9�, EE r `�--------o +----_-______ \ --��`_ of--- ___ �v�/ ,/,� III a III C)/ /� ova', _—�' y --- N 04 --- ----- o� N. - - - - _13 _ _ _ _ -58_6-- _ _�_--__ _� ~�� d/43.160.DO SF _// �� --- ---------�--_--- - --348.56'- - - - - - � - - - - - - - III � j _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Q. Aw I p = 24'82'30" --_-------------- -- --- _ -.- R55 66� PROPOSED 6' PEDESTRIAN - - --- -- -- �!--\` ----�T - _ I- - - �- - - --- - - - _ / S T = 12 .01 &SIDEWALK ESMT. — > .� SFre PROPOSED 6' PEDESTRIAN —"Qi Df R.O.W.R.O. W. LINE 1 _ .00 `i"\ Rqi �4C�\ L = 23 .39 ' I / & SIDEWALK ESMT. (I _ _ \ ` ` 6 O\ Nqc ,. . _— 586----- 1 I . F fs r CH = 74 54 59 W — 234.61 T ' Q = \ 0*49'59" PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN 1 N. M R = �7.42' & SIDEWA�, ESMT. T = 16 42 ; N 70i \03' 40 " W — 1 Or. Q 14 7' ZONED AG I ZONED AG ,� I LOW DENSITY `� " _T I I 1 \\ LOW DENSITY I LOW DENSITY / { TY �� I CH = N 7`87 1 14 W - 320.90 /, N 69' 2�' 20- W - 100. R p�,�L I RESIDENTIAL / I RESIDENTIAL� , �\ { \ I ��---_,, i 1 `. �., \ � 67 05' 00" W — 32.69 I 1 \ // �/ �� I E. T. HIGGINS 1 ` / FRANK STANLEY SHELBY �� J.J. THWEATT Ck4RLES L. BURG LOT\1, BLOCK 1, HIGGINS ADDINON 1 `\ WALTER C. SCHERTI `•88 ----� DANNY L. RODGERST`' VOL. 4968, PG. 933 VOL. 3369, PG. 34 \ VOL. 1549, PG. 446 1 VOL. 3470, PG. 197 VOL. 6102, PG. 234 �\ VOL. 4779, PG. 54 \ \ ` ZONED AG ZONED AG*--,.,- ` I I ` _i_,�--____�__, LOW DENSITY-�, LOW DENSITY`\ LOW DENSITY SRESIDENTIAL 590------_RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL \ ., MARIO & ANGLE MOL I NA ., ZONED AG �N LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ^ N I W _ tx)MARIO & ANGLE MOLINA ZONED AG o MEDIUM DENSITY p RESIDENTIAL RECD F E B 12 2001 FZ`\ N N \ L" ' � i z�� W W W ZF W z 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 N 0 U 0 U 0 U 0k U �u Or� Lu uu 0 0 0 W a W a W Q- W a a a 4 Id z w Cu U) S WCC W `�i W Lu zCD z�� Lrj Z A _ z w r. co Wa17, X !� uW EDW�• Z� ;= Z 'g ME rA� z� ZIrWL0 cm _l ( o m) U) U Cu 0 a� me z00E C =go�S YF� 5 g`E9 • P nog o�_ 4 C 0.1 as .E g 1' Y ..E46f6 i W.t-O• •� o bn ?.0io £ [ �yL S P C p E v M CA 0 $o � C. 0 P t Y [ r 0 E.F z O >C Q Vw a z QO un .•+� � W ax W C7� W H r� THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INTERIM REVIEW AND COMMENT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF G. ROBERT ADAMS, P.E. REGISTRATION No. 86184, ON V 11101 THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING OR PERMITTING PURPOSES. PROJECT MGR. G. R.A PROJECT TECH. G. R.A. CHECKED BY JOB NO. 2000.061 SHEET NO. CASE no. Z800.01" © Copyright 2000, ACEI 0 0 0 0 [V i w i I I I I I I ! I \ I I II SSMH FL=1482.49 I I ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED /N THE F. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 511, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING LOT 2, BLOCK 1 OF THE EMERALD CANE RESERVOIR ESTATES SOUTH SUBDIVISION, FILED APRIL 27, 1984, RECORDED UNDER PLAT RECORD VOLUME 388-171, PAGE 99, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (P. R. T. C. T) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED DMON COUNTY AS FOLLOWS. TARRANT COUNTY - BIEG WMVC AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF THE EMERALD ESTATES SOUTH SUBDIVISION AND BEING SOUTH 59 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 133. 11 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR DOVE ROAD AND NORTH CARROLL AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF THE EMERALD ESTATES SOUTH SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 422.08 FEET, - THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 547.29 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 317.63 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 880.98 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 271.89 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE ROAD; THENCE NORTH 67 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE WOAD A DISTANCE OF 32.69 FEET,• � THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE �� SE ROAD A DISTANCE OF 100.01 FEET; . LAND USE.- MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTUL TOTAL ACREAGE: 9.062 Acres THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE EXST• ZONING. AG ROAD A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL PROPOSED ZONMIG. SF -IA ANGLE OF 20 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 59 SECONDS, A RADIUS OF 887.42 FEET, A TANGENT LENGTH a- TOTAL L01$• 7 OF 163.14 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 78 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST A TOTAL / DM'ELIJNIG WM 7 I DISTANCE OF 320.90 FEET; GROSS D*nLm UMRS/ACRE, a 773 urns/Aces 80' Tp&L ELECTRIC ESMT. ACRE4GE• a737 Acme THENCE /N A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE NET ACREAGE. 8.325 Acres I ROAD A DISTANCE OF 322.67 FEET; _ 1HEJ" NORTH 89 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE "{ r ROAD A DISTANCE OF 649.74 TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ! I ANGLE OF 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 30 SECONDS, A RADIUS OF 555.66 FEET, A TANGENT LENGTH OF 120.01 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 74 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 234.61 FEET; THENCE IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DOVE ROAD A DISTANCE OF 236.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 9.062 ACRES OF i LAND, MORE OR LESS. LOT 6, BLOCK 2 LOT 12, BLOCK 2 I I I I I I I 1 EMERALD ESTATES EMERALD ESTATES VOL. 388- 165, PG. 48, PRTCT VOL. 388-165, PG. 48, PRTCT \ ZONED SF1-A LOW DENSITY I RESIDENTIAL I FL = 480.92 I I r =14" & 18" S 871' 47' E 547.29' — �i1.4� — — / — -6'SS - SSMH SSMH SSMN — _ _ _— f32.1� — 13�0 — FL-479.63 I SSMH — _8 SS = 1 -- - ------ FL=479. 3 W FL=482.11 I — 8 /-- -------__ 0' UTILITY EASEMENT S ! ---------- ---- ----- -- //i"------- \ �_------ --- ---•--- - - - - --------- SSMH 1 FL 4 1 V)C III III III = � .V Q �a PROPOSED III DRAINAGE EASEMENT III III ! I cn J ►'i p •- ' PROPOSED DETE vnav Poov0 I II j Q! �� N.' W N 2i1;� I -- ---------- _____ ______-- 0 O " O 60' ELECTRIC SEMfNT PP Q� o TEXAS POWER fe LIGHT O VOL. 6853, PG. o 1170 _h 0 0 ENEIVILD CIRCLE N I I I LOT 2, BLOCK 4 LOW DENSITY EMERALD ESTATES VOL. 388-165, PG. 48, PRTCT RESIDENTIAL I I � W LOT 1, BLOCK 4 (3 EMERALD ESTATES BLOCK 1 VOL. 388-165, PG. 48, PRTCT \J ( I ZONED 0-1 � -r � L,� �' i MEDIUM DENSITY 4 I I RESIDENTIAL 58 911 36 SF _ 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT 63,993.98 SF } J J J J p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W W W GRAPHIC SCALE 0 60 120 180 240 300 FEET SCALE = 1" = 60' LEGEND rELE f EX/STING TELEPHONE POLE PP f I EXISTING POWER POLE SSMH ® EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE I — — — 8" wTF -- EXISTING WATER LINE - 8 SS --- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE --- -- 14" FM,— - - EXISTING FORCE MAIN 8" wTR PROPOSED WATER LINE pd PROPOSED WATER VALVE NOTE: ALL WATER LINES UNDER DOVE STREET SHALL BE BORED. LOT 4, BLOCK 4 LOT 5, BLOCK 4 LOT 6, BLOCK 4 LOT 7, BLOCK 4 EMERALD ESTATES EMERALD ESTATES � EMERALD ESTATES EMERALD ESTATES VOL. 388- 165, PG. 48, PRTCT VOL. 388- 165, PG. 48, PRTCT VOL. 388- 165, PG. 48, PRTCT VOL. 388- 165, PG. 48, PRTCT LOT 3, BLOCK 4 EMERALD ESTATES VOL. 388- 165, PG. 48, PRTCT I S 88' 40' 2}5" E — 880.98' I 2 3 61,413.32 SF 61,279.29 SF -- - \I � Q I l c.or 2 P.O.B. I I EXISTING ONING = AG 9.062 Acres � i . • I I I PROPOSED Z NING = SF-1A 11I v) z EMERALD ESTATES SOUTH VOL. 388- 171, PG. 99, PRTCT � LOW DENSIT RESIDENTIAL I I III � � III 5 It I h v III 49,036.45 SF THIS LOT TO SHALL HAVE AEROBIC IRRIGATION OSSF 10RAiN4 \132.61'----------132.02'------ _— —15' 9RA/1wGE ESMT — ----132.02'----- ---34d.56'-------------------- R = 555.66 --- - 50' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT Lai 34y. 64 182.53 I PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE do UTILITY EASEMENT (BLOCK 1 MARIO &ANGIE MOLINA � III W 48 � � � I THIS LOT TO SHALL HAVE U AEROBIC IRRIGATION OSSF 56,536.79 SF ZONED AG I � I k6 LOW DENSITY III p W Q, (LnQ IT N RESIDENTIAL C7) ! I W 43,560.00 SF � �MARIO &ANGIE MOL/NA Z `- N ZONED AG -> -' THIS LOT TO SHALL AEROBIC IRRIGATION HAVE OSSF � MEDIUM DENSITY PROPOSED 6 PEDESTR411v - - - ---- -- _ T = 120.01 � s!DEWALK ESMT. , p RESIDENTIAL L = 236.39' PROPOSED 6' PEDESTRIAN OLD R.D.W. LINE j & SIDEWALK ESMT. � CH = N 74' 54' 59" W — 234.61 ' \ ZONED AG LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WALTER C. SCHERTZ VOL, 3470. PG. 197 I � " � a 20 49 59 PROPOSED 6' PEDESTRIAN & SIDEWALK ESMT I R = 887.42 N 70' 03' 40" W - 100.0 ZONED AG ZONED AG I L = 322.67' LOW DENSITY LOW DENSITY I CH = N 78' 41 ' 14" W - 320.90' N 69' 29' 20" W RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL N 67' 05' 00" W - 32.69 � E. T. HIGG/NS DANNY L. RODGERS FRANK STANLEY SHELBY VOL. 4779, PG. 54 J.J. THWEATT VOL. 4968, PG. 933 CHARLES L. BURG VOL. 3369, PG. 34 LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HIGG/NS ADDITION VOL. 1549, PG. 446 VOL. 6102, PG. 234 ZONED AG ZONED AG ZONED SF1-A LOW DENSITY LOW DENSITY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REC'D FEB 12 2001 RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL cAsE No. zAooyos�► w N Q n W Wm° Z ZE5 o � Q � 7.7 W a THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INTER/AI RENEW AND COMMENT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF G. ROBERT ADAMS, P.E. REGISTRATION No. 86184, ON 1/11/D 1 THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING OR PERMITTING PURPOSES. PROJECT MGR. G. R.A PROJECT TECH. G.R.A. CHECKED BY JOB N0, 2000.061 SHEET N0. © Copyright 2000, ACE(