Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1997-01-07 CC Packet
City of,Southlake,Texas. MEMORANDU' M', January 3:, 1997 - TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council' FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager.: : SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and.Other'Items of Interest for City Council Meeting January 7, 1997 1. Agenda Item No. 7A. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No: 480-223. ZA 96-136. Rezoning and Concept Plan for.Foxborough (formerly.Fox Glen): The applicant has revised the submittal to reflect the majority of the comments and recommendations made with the Council approval of the first reading 7-0. Our attorney (Wayne Olson) discussed the issue regarding our ability to enforce deed restrictions with the applicant's attorney (Rick Wilhelm).and encouraged him to provide us with information to support their position that the city could enforce deed restrictions. Wayne has not heard back from Rick on the matter. I am,aware, as are our attorneys, that the City of Houston has specific legislative authority to enforce deed restrictions, since it has no zoning. We are not aware of any legislative authority to allow us to enter into:.the enforcement of private contracts. We will discuss this issue further in executive session should City Council want to get more detail on this subject. Recall that although there is significant opposition to this request, there currently is not 20% or greater opposition from the adjacent property owners within 200' of the actual rezoning request. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough or Greg Last if you have any questions regarding this request. 2. Agenda Item No. 7B. ZA 96-137. Preliminary Plat for `Foxborough. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request: :The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0, granting Some\modifications to building setbacks',as noted`in' the staff report. i n • S Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other,Items of Interest = January 3, 1997 • Page 2 3. Agenda Item No. 7C. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-224, ZA 96-145. Rezoning and Concept Plan for Southlake Town Center. The Councilmembers who attended the working meeting on January 2 requested that the applicant revise their submitted text to reflect the concerns resolved at that meeting. We will forward you this revised information as soon as we receive it. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 3-2. 4. Agenda Item No. 7D. ZA 96-146. Site Plan for Mesco Addition Lot 5. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. If you recall, the original concept plan approved a 4,200 s.f. building on this lot; however, the applicant submitted a site plan showing a 5,325 s.f. building. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0, granting modifications to the building's square footage to 4,619 s.f. (based on revised plans submitted by the applicant at the meeting), and to the configuration of the drive to • the carwash. 5. Agenda Item No. 7E. Resolution No. 96-67, ZA 96-147. Specific Use Permit for the Sale of Packaged Beer for Off-Premise Consumption for Mesco Addition Lot 5, Block 1. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 with the same modifications as noted above. 6. Agenda Item No. 7F. ZA 96-148. Site Plan for Liberty Bank, located at 2438 E. Southlake Blvd. There are no unresolved issues regarding,this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0, granting modifications to the fire,lane, the dumpster gate, and the horizontal and vertical articulation as noted in the staff report. Staff has confirmed the Fire Marshal's fire lane requirement for this site and has attached an exhibit of the preferred location to the review letter in your packet. 11) 7. Agenda Item No. 7G. ZA 96-149. Plat Revision for the proposed Lot .1R1, Block -1, 1 � W.E. Mayfield Addition for. Liberty Bank. . Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this submittal.7-0. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 3, 1997 ® Page 3 8. Agenda Item No. 7H. ZA 96-151. Site Plan for the Village at Timarron, Phase I. Although there are quite a few remaining review comments, there are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 with the modifications noted in the staff report. 9. ' Agenda Item No. 8A. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-219, ZA 96-124. Rezoning and Concept Plan for Crestwood Office Park. There have been no changes in the submittal since Council tabling of this item at your last meeting. There is generally no opposition to this request. Mr. Strunck is noted as being opposed in the staff report, however he stated at the P&Z meeting that Mr. McMahan had resolved his concerns. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-2, with the dissenting commissioners • being opposed due to the fact that the Corridor Study Land Use Recommendation shows Residential for this area. Councilmember Moffat requested that we provide a summary of the zoning approvals since adoption of the Corridor Study and whether or not the zonings complied with the Land Use Recommendations. This research was attached to the previous packet for your information. The Commission included several modifications as noted in the staff report. The applicant submitted a revised plan which includes some, but not all, of the commissions' recommendations. The staff review is based on the ordinance requirements so you will need to make sure your motion includes the other P&Z recommendations, if this is your intention. We would like to clarify comment number 2 in the staff review summary regarding the required fence on the west line. The applicant is proposing a fence as required, but only along a portion of the property line. The ordinance requires the fence • along the entirety of the line. Our comment reflects that it is provided, but it should go further to state that it is not provided, to the full extent required. Feel free to contact Greg Last or Dennis Killough if you have any questions regarding this application. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 3, 1997 ® Page 4 Recall that there was some discussion concerning whether or not the City would be liable for damages if Carroll is relocated. Our attorneys have researched this and issued an opinion that we would not be liable; the closure of N. Carroll Road would not constitute a damaging of the property as long as Crestwood Office Park retains reasonable access along FM 1709. We will discuss this during executive session. 10. Agenda Item No. 8B. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-225. ZA 96-150. Rezoning and Site Plan for the Children's Courtyard located 200' west of the intersection of Waterford Drive and Southlake Blvd. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial (7-0) of this request because they felt that the use was too intense for this site. They recommended a less intensive office use at this location. A supermajority vote of the Council will be required to overturn the Commission's recommendation to deny. 11. Agenda Item No. 8C. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 480-211, ZA 96-90. Rezoning and Concept Plan for Shady Oaks Centre (formerly presented as Southlake Professional Plaza). There have been a great number of issues related to this request. The developer and the adjacent homeowners have worked together to resolve their differences and the plan before you, accompanied by the homeowner's requests, is the result of their cooperative efforts. Staff and the City Attorneys recommended some changes to the wording of the homeowner's requests to make them more objective and less subjective. These recommendations were incorporated in the approval motion (5-0) by P&Z. One item still needs to be clarified regarding the reference to required parking. The P&Z motion recommended that the parking meet the "current" zoning ordinance. Staff would recommend that the wording be changed to "the zoning ordinance in place at the time of ® site plan submittal." Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 3, 1997 Page 5 Although it is our understanding that the adjacent homeowner issues have been worked out, the opposition letters have not been withdrawn so there is greater than 20% opposition to this request, thereby requiring a supermajority vote for approval. Feel free to contact Greg Last concerning this item if you have any questions. 12. Agenda Item No. 8D. ZA 96-156, Revised Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition. Phase 5. The applicant has submitted this revision in order to save trees and has adjusted the interior lotting to accomplish this. As a result, there are eight (8) fewer lots in this submittal than were approved for this portion of Phase 5 in May, 1996. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0-1), deleting Item #6 regarding Street "I" cul-de-sac length to allow as shown. If you have any questions regarding this case, please contact Dennis • Killough. 13. Agenda Item No. 8E, Ordinance No. 668, 1st Reading, street name change from Ravenaux Drive to Countryside Court - As noted in the memo from Tom Elgin, Planner, the Countryside Bible Church has requested that the name of Ravenaux Drive extending west from North White Chapel Boulevard, be changed since the road will not be extended through to the Ravenaux Place subdivision. They have requested this with full cooperation from the Christian Men's Network. Note that they have requested a waiver of the $100 fee required in our fee schedule, since they are both non-profits. There is no problem with waiving this fee if this is your desire. 14. Agenda Item Nos. 9A and 9B, Appointments to Park Board and SPDC - The memos from Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary, provide you with the specifics needed to make these appointments. These are the vacancies created by the resignation of Rod Johnson. Note • that the term for the Park Board seat is through 1999, while the SPDC term expires in May 1997. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 3, 1997 ® Page 6 15. Agenda Item No. 10A. Award of bid for depository services. The low bid for the City's depository services is that submitted by Texas National Bank, our current depository bank. The memo from Director of Finance Lou Ann Heath points out the advantages to the City from the TNB bid: • $15,409 cost for the required and additional services for the 3-year period, a savings of$11,231 over the next lowest bid, Bank of America, at $26,640; • an annual cost benefit of $3,900 ($11,700 for the 3-year period) for immediate credit on deposits, a benefit not offered by the other banks; • an annual estimated earning of$20,666 ($62,000 for the 3-year period) given the interest rate TNB will pay our investments, greater than that offered by the next lowest bid. (Based on a $3 million certificate of deposit.) Council should be aware that the bid specifications called for the bidders to supply a bid bond of$5,000. The purpose of the bid bond is to assure that the bids are submitted in good faith. Once the bid is awarded, the bid bond is returned to the bidders. At the bid opening, it was discovered that Texas National Bank had neglected to include the bid bond in its submittal. TNB offered to submit the bond at that time, but was advised not to do so given the fact that TNB currently holds our deposits. The language of the notice to bidders reserves for the City the right to reject any and all bids and to waive all formality except the time of filing. Given the overall savings to the City, staff recommends that the depository agreement be awarded to Texas National Bank. The bid analysis submitted by our consultant is attached for your review. Please contact me or Lou Ann Heath if you have any questions regarding this item. 16. Agenda Item No. 10B, Developer Agreement for Southlake Woods. Phase I - As noted • in the memo from Ron Harper, City Engineer, the developer agreement before you now Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 3, 1997 Page 7 is a "standard" agreement. Essentially, Toll Brothers has agreed to pay their impact fees and contribute $75,000 toward the improvement of Continental (turn lane in front of their subdivision and improvements at Davis). 17. Agenda Item No. 11A. 1997 Community Development Block Grant application for sanitary sewer improvements for Sutton Place. The staff-recommended project for this year's grant application is storm drainage improvements to facilitate drainage within the Sutton Place Addition. Topographical surveying and engineering studies have indicated the need for drainage improvements beyond those planned in the 1995 "Timing of Improvements." Staff will provide updated estimates and revised anticipated timing of improvements at the meeting. • FYI, a meeting for the neighborhoods of Oak Hills Mobile Estates and Sutton Place has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, January 14, at the Community Center to provide an update on the CDBG grant program improvements projected for those neighborhoods. Community Development and Public Works staff will provide information, answer questions, gather input and solicit cooperation for Southlake's CDBG program. Please feel free to contact Tom Elgin if you have questions on the Tarrant County CDBG program. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 18. FYI, today Bob Whitehead, Greg Last, Dee Ekstrom and I met with Jim Monday, Telesupport Property Manager, regarding Telesupport's plans to develop the southeast corner of Westwood Drive and FM 1709. We discussed a possible solution to the traffic problem at Westwood and how Telesupport's plans could alleviate this problem. Mr. Monday was interested and said they would be willing to discuss this further with the City. 4110 Greg will be meeting with Telesupport's staff next week to further discuss alternatives. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest 410 January 3, 1997 Page 8 19. Telecommunications Update - We have spent considerable time with you in the past discussing the ramifications of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 for cities, and want to continue to provide you with updates on activity related to this legislation. You may recall that a legal battle is waging between TCI (cable company) and the City of Troy, Michigan. To summarize simply, TCI is questioning the authority of the City of Troy to manage its rights-of-way, including requiring franchises and fair compensation for use. Essentially, this case is an attempt by cable companies to provide telephone service without a telephone franchise or franchise fees. It is the position of cities all over the country that Congress specifically preserved the rights of the cities to control public rights- of-way when they passed this legislation, and that this is not an issue left to the discretion of the FCC. However, TCI has taken issue with the cities' efforts to preserve their control • of the ROW, paving the way for one of the first "test cases" with the legislation. Many cities view this as an extremely important case for local governments, and are offering financial and legal assistance to Troy. Note the attached clipping from the Arlington Morning News editorial page, describing some of the efforts undertaken by the City of Arlington. The City of Southlake has contributed a total of $450 toward this legal effort, and continues to monitor the progress of the case. FYI, we recently received word that initial discussion between city officials and the FCC on some of these issues was not necessarily encouraging. It appears that some FCC staff believe they have jurisdiction to review and possibly preempt municipal right-of-way management and compensation requirements. The FCC held a public forum on December 16 to discuss its role in managing the public • rights-of-way. During this forum, municipalities made the case that: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 3, 1997 ® Page 9 1) Public right-of-way management and compensation are inherently local issues, best dealt with by local governments, 2) the FCC lacks the experience and ability to deal with these issues, and 3) the FCC does not have the jurisdiction to address these issues under the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. Representatives from the telephone/cable industries took a different position on all of these issues and urged the FCC to severely restrict telecommunications franchising and franchise fees. There is concern that the FCC may side with the telecommunications industry. • FYI, there is an article in the December 23 issue of the Nation's Cities Weekly concerning this issue. We will keep you informed of further developments as they occur. 20. Public Works Update: Randol Mill Paving -- Paving has been accomplished on a majority of the road. Cleanup work remains. Project should be completed by mid-January. Pearson Lane Ground Storage Tank -- Site work is proceeding. Materials have been ordered for the tank. Concrete foundation work and work on the pump station and underground piping and utilities has begun. The entire project is scheduled for completion by June 1997. Kimball/White Chapel water line -- work is approximately 75% complete. 20 inch water line on FM 1709 (White Chapel east to Miron Addition) -- Contract has been awarded and work will begin once necessary easements have been acquired. Water system improvements for Hilltop -- Contract has been awarded. Preconstruction • conference was held on Thursday, January 2, 1997 and work should commence in 2-3 weeks. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • January 3, 1997 Page 10 21. Internet Home Page Update -- Internet access has been made available to selected employee users and work on a homepage is progressing. We have begun loading various information into the required text format for Internet(HTML) and continue to develop the look and feel in terms of colors, graphics and structure. Initially, we plan to include such information as: ✓ a list of elected officials and key staff persons, ✓ meeting agendas and minutes, V monthly calendar of meetings and park and recreation activities, V SPIN information, V community development information, V an on-line copy of the most recent "Southlake In Review," • ✓ a "Frequently Asked Questions" section The homepage will be continually upgraded and new features added as citizen feedback warrants. If you have any suggestions for the most "Frequently Asked Questions" section, please contact Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager, at extension 710. 22. Keep Southlake Beautiful Letter -- Attached is a letter from Lisa Stokdyk, Keep Southlake Beautiful President, expressing their interest in sponsoring the small triangular piece of land between the Wal-Mart and Kimball right-of-way as an "Adopt-A-Spot." As you may recall, this tract (5,380 sf) is a remnant severed from the main parcel when Kimball Avenue was relocated between SH 114 and FM 1709 (a map is attached). The parcel has no value to Wal-Mart and is too small to be developed once the various setbacks are considered. • At its October meeting, Keep Southlake Beautiful was approached by staff to determine their interest in supporting the tract as a native planting demonstration site or some similar use. KSB has set as one of its goals to develop an "Adopt-A-Spot" program. After some Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest 40 January 3, 1997 Page 11 discussion, the item was tabled until November in order to allow Board members to view the site. At its November meeting, the Board voted to coordinate efforts to beautify and maintain the site should the City choose to purchase it. This is expressed in the attached letter from Lisa Stokdyk. FYI, Suzanne Tuttle with the Fort Worth Nature Center, and a member of the KSB Board of Directors, did a survey of the site to determine what plantings existed. The list is attached and as you can see, most of the plants and trees are native Texas species. 23. January Calendar - Your packet contains a calendar documenting all upcoming meetings for the month of January. Please take some time and pencil these meetings in on your calendar. Note particularly the January 16 special meeting with CISD. 24. Thoroughfare Plan Update. The P&Z Commission will meet in work session 7:00 p.m., Monday, January 6 at the Community Center to discuss Continental Boulevard. In response to citizen requests, the Commission directed consultant and staff to perform additional research to aid their determination of the Continental Boulevard roadway. The current draft of the MTP shows Continental as a five-lane section with an extension to SH 26 (which is the same as the current MTP). Pending the outcome of the work session, the formal consideration of the MTP and the public hearing are scheduled for the January 23 P&Z meeting. Please feel free to contact Tom Elgin if you have questions. CE /kb SoUth Keep Southiake Beautiful, Inc. e 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. to Southiake, Texas 76092 December 31, 1996 'eauti{ Lisa Stokdyk,President Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers: Kay Baker, Vice President Mike Lease,Treasurer Wendy Carlucci At its November 4, 1996 meeting, the Board of Directors of Keep Phyllis Calton Southiake Beautiful discussed the small triangular shaped roe at the Jane Jane Cousins p p p rty Tammy Dunn northwest corner of FM 1709 and Kimball Avenue (next to Wal-Mart). It Jim Goggin / is our understandingthat the Citymayat some time consider acquiring the Amy Martin Q $ Anne Peel property due to its unsuitability for development. Tom Sanderlin Julia Smith Suzanne Tuttle Keep Southiake Beautiful has been discussing the concept of an "Adopt-A- Theresa Von Rath Spot" program, modeled after our successful Adopt-A-Street program. This property would make an ideal location for adoption, which would 'include beautifying and maintaining the site. • After some discussion, the Keep Southlake Beautiful Board of Directors voted in favor of promoting this property as part of our new Adopt-A-Spot program, should the City of Southlake choose to acquire the land. Since . + most of our limited funding is already allocated to other projects, KSB does not currently have the money to adopt this spot itself. If it is the desire of City Council, Keep Southlake Beautiful would actively seek a sponsor to adopt this site and agree to beautify and maintain it under KSB's A KEEP TEXAS BEAUTIFUL program. PROUD COMMUNITY Please feel free to call me at 481-6903 if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Lisa Stokdyk President cc: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Aikle . i An Affiliate of FPKeep America Beautiful, Inc. m.1r 1 . 1•:04'XI If[-mar CTIC.RAIL IRA • - -7.,.„��....y ww OW 144.1., 47. s r rr sr[-re ar Aitr'------- fr ri.Slr lr aPt-w..r 1 1 gL/MIS OM _____ _ .I II — — -- - r_-_, - -}-}� Ir VRAI OR. • ) un II w , li 1 I Tii I I 1 ' / ; I 1I 1/r LR.'(b)al I/ 1r LRU{'oR. /�y1/ �1 a / /- 7r MST[111T.-M • t :anti K6LtM1 L CILIC ICI I I AA I I Tit OEM • • 1 1 i I , l :11 I < i THOSAA4p HOCK ' I I; I II '' i y TEXAS co. CE a.8 ki Vol 0732 Pg.141 �" 1 1F7-1Dep _ru-i__- - - I I ,I x uRm[aR. II -_- '-B.4T-_ J �L--�___ _ 1 . __ 11 111 U :se1rsr[—[11.i, -i-�----_-- TTTrrr'' I 1 �� --- — --- 1 ` asllrRur�w ..11 17 of ` a 1110E dr 41«,.� L:MIT I I 1I l 1 , TO MY LI al.iIfasrt-aisr III .-IacrK 1 i �4 vi4i:,l 1 HOLLOW 1r UTILITY OW I I-. t.1116.77 \ IT Mr 17R. STOAT { , ', �. v:� wa• IUT ts 1, BLOCK 1 it.. ,/ , In IR\.st)` • IAilfr 171f. LOT 2 L, 1 ,,r''' 1 ' %ming Dash UN.PP.-StZO I ,, I \ ``' W1C9761.IPa713 r. • VIM Of. L{ , ` . 1S ourr or. ,'l I. ti,6 \ % KI.BALL/1 019/Don ON x100o Aa • 1 1 I g y %\ LOT L BM 1 .In..P.Ferrer,Me u*Farrar A.b.rty, L;. 1 CAR A eL>X 140 wf.ln�Boott Farrar >;e 1 `; ,, Moro..Ina 1/t LA.(�.I) � ' I , Pg.•01 Aprl 0,teat 1 pM. , 1 W' AK 1 1 1 10�[•17 LOW MOOR i1fl P.room MI I ` 1 1 I 7 " UAW/OK TM MATS CSIIC I, CO. , I 1 1 i ROA LOD ML I0167 It.MO it IS,MI/ 8 i, 1 ■1[ALL FIAYIL Mr I - I 1 WPM COaRVVal f , 1 i J • Elsa_IOOSP 3-7-IMt I �1�I a ( J 1 1 I I KI BALL/VW ADDIT10N I,Mr 1 Ir- J I LOT ABx2 �I I I_ i ' CAB.A eLDE-146 sr LL LLl' — — — -- s• ___-- -_—__—:WIN t31JL. I I _ IQ VIM CWT. ...04 ,. .\ sn Lk 1 --- - N !!9 55. 47' It - 811.60' At:If 18 Orr-Our 1 1 al:s w srxr -• _—.-- -• 117.17• F.14. 1709 (130' R.O.W.) '.Of a'Or f.6477 (fir" L.III2r 11 ER.s 77 Or Ir■-179.Ir ART F1UTT-TRUSTEE EAST TEXAS PROPEHTEB LOT 3 LOT 2 LOT 1 Vol 7261 P?900 NC.-TRUSTEE BM B BM B BL.K B Vol 6406 Pa 250 • -9Oti BIJS♦rE PARK- a A FINAL PLAT OF NOTE LOT 2, BLOCK 1 WARMS NO CISINCES 90191 O«IITILITY EASMENTS FARRAR ADDITION An FOR CORE U&OF EASEMENTS BONG 23.958 ACRES OUT Of THC T. WW1 SUR., S A-I041 LOCATED IN THE CRT Of SOUT}M.AKL. TAAIIAITT COUNTY, TEXAS AUGUST 15, 199E / 1 LOT "OIL OWIIEIt SURVEYOR THE ROCOWERS Cr MINER ER LOTS SKIRL 1aYRAI4 SITE fRWMGIJS N WAL-WART STORES INC. ADAMS CONSULTTS0 ENGIIIEERS, INC. • ACLORpy1Ci r111i 111E UI. SUBOMSOI oR 3I4N a. 701 S. WALTON BLVD. /320 COPILMIO R0. BENTONVILE, AR 72716 TYLER, TEXAS 73703 501/273-4000 903/541-8911. • tiK a .• n.r .. A !{Qr1� • • PLANT LIST FOR THE STRIP OF PRIVATE LAND IN FRONT OF WAL-MART TREES Mimosa (Albizia julibrissin)* Wooly Bumelia (Bumelia lanuginosa) Pecan (Carva illinoiensis) Sugar Hackberry (Celtis laevigata) Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Eastern Redcedar (Juniperus virginiana) Bois d'.Arc (Maclura pomifera) Blackjack Oak (Quercus marilandica) Post Oak (Quercus stellata) American Elm (IJlmus americana) Cedar Elm (Ulmus crassifolia) SHRUBS Possumhaw (Ilex decidua) Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense)* Prickly Pear Cactus (Opuntia sp.) Smooth Sumac (Rhus glabra) Prairie Flameleaf Sumac (Rhus lanceolata) Coralberry (Svmphoricarpos orbiculatus) Twistleaf Yucca (Yucca arkansana) GRASSES ® Splitbeard Bluestem (Andropogon ternarius) Broomsedge Bluestem (Andropogon virginicus) Oldfield Threeawn (Aristida oligantha) King Ranch Bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum)* Scribner's Dichanthelium (Dichanthelium scribnerianum) Little Bluestem (Schizachvrium scoparium) Knotroot Bristlegrass (Setaria geniculata) Johnsongrass (Sorghum halapense)* Meadow Dropseed (Sporobolus drummondii) Purpletop (Tridens flavus) VINES Cow Itch Vine (Cissus incisa) Carolina Snailseed (Cocculus caroliniana) Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica)* Wild Blackberry (Rubus sp.) Saw Greenbriar (Smilax bona-nox) Mustang Grape (Vitis mustangensis) FORBS Annual Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisifolia) Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Camphor Daisy (Heterotheca latifolia) Goldenrod (Solidago sp.) 41111 *denotes a non-native species. Plants are arranged in alphabetical order according to scientific genus. January 5 - February 1, 1997 Upcoming Me-: _s and Events SUNDA MONDAY TUESDAY WED .-- 0 AY THURSDAY FRIDAY SA AY Jan 5 Jan 6 Jan 7 Jan 8 Jan 9 Jan 10 Jan 11 ` 11:30am CC w/CM 11:30am Mayor lunch 7:00pm Sister Cities 7:00pm P&Z Meeting 6:00pm MCP Com @ w/CM and DPW ' Mtg @ Admin , WhChRm 5:00pm City Council 7:00pm SYAC Mtg @ 7:00pm KSB Mtg Work Session Park 7:00pm P&Z WS 6:00pm City Council 7:00pm SPIN #13- re:MTPlan @ Mtg Dvlpr Mtg --MelAir WhChRm @ Wh Ch Rm • Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 15 Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18 9:30am Director's 7:00pm JUC Mtg @ 6:30pm City Council packet Day Mtg @ CC Rm CISD Work Session (MCP; 10:00am Staff/Agenda 7:00pm CDBG TIF)w/CISD @ 6:30pm Chamber Mtg @ CC Rm Program- Sutton Solana Awards Banquet @ 11:30am City Council Place Mtg @ Park Solana lunch w/CM 6:30pm Park Board Mtg - Jan 19 Jan 20 Jan 21 Jan 22 Jan 23 Jan 24 Jan 25 9:30am Director's 5:00pm City Council 7:30am Metroport Mtg @ Admin Work Session Mtg @ Solana 11:30am City Council 6:00pm City Council Education Ctr lunch w/CM Mtg 7:00pm P&Z Meeting 6:00pm SPDC Mtg @ 11:30pm Mayor Lunch CC Rm w/CM Jan 26 Jan 27 Jan 28 Jan 29 Jan 30 Jan 31 Feb 1 6:30pm Employee 7:00pm Joint CC/Park 7:00pm SPIN Packet Day Awards Banquet Board Mtg Standing Comm Mtg 7:00pm BBOA Mtg Note: Change in Metroport Mtg date (1/23) this month only. 1/3/1997 NEWS CLIPPING Source: abty -.,Liskuf'''L Date: 121 1 cL Council approves 1st readings for Foxborough and Town Center Progress Report In their last official meeting of 1996 the City Council approved the first readings of two rezoning and concept plan applications that drew large 1 crowds and opposition as they y went through the approval City Hall ' process. f r ,�q Foxborough is a 48.9 acre development on Southlake m I ` Blvd. about 1140 feet west of N. Q "I ' Carroll Ave. It will have 63 building lots on the site and one p I office lot. N I I Home Councilman'Gary Fawks A U I 1 Depot told the applicant. David McMahan. "You began this Z. • process with a lot of opposition, I I . but from the looks of the crowd „ I 1 ' you have done a good job mitigating any differences." Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) Tamara McMillan, speaking on behalf of adjoining The 130 acre site of Town Center. homeowners disagreed. "Don't mistake the lack of turnout as a r ys �,y,, i y g; ,y$ sign of approval,"she said,"there , 1 a. r ^ nF xr do l,g t is still much opposition to this }I. gvIf;,,.�p'f a asp, } `j :F t-' a'develo ment." She went on to " t �.,w irk t' N• .:,,,4'• saythat the groupshe spoke for '�' r r 'ft7.: k W t '-i' ','•':V:,'` Po ,..ti t .;1. .,E^,N_,' z; nr . ;iC:;K 61. .r 'ems; ti�„£rf ''.. .�,,:.;S:r,,. » still had concerns over lot # ''` tt �; :t xs. ,;•,•: density. traffic safetyand " "k"•, ;< t::, F ;;�,,, :.:„,,';.`.'',,,,,,�z`•st,rm � �tom%•� ri 4 ,s�':..a. ::�:.:•,� drainage. "We also want the city s ! Y`^�'.l t _ • • a • • t r1 involved in the deed restrictions \,,. . /,'!;��k•-' `$d ar • " to insure consistent quality,' she ':,; ,-i t c i",i.'s"% : wt:�„=M< <;j �'"�`" '°��'fit'.•,s� ,u added. .:.4° ; L ; c: ` ,i/a '': .� $� f�'¢i1 Mayor Stacy thanked her 1. "".,•?^ '. yy�v�/ ``'.. i. t,, �`r k-` v' for input and assured her that she : ..;;, ), ;".+,`1•`, N.f,_`. < .1•4l' `d , and others played a big part in l~; '` % •'y~!• N`'' "f �" making the project as good as it : '•. .it �y. 7' 15. ... ."I+.. .. "That was our intention, ,, 4� 1 said Ms.McMillan. . .• '" "- ' Prior to discussions on ; 4ti :`f,"f•' ti: ::, the Town Center plan Mayor 1 =` " :;,. . '` A=•,`.a '. Stacy commented that a ;i?yy��+�' >i •K`' ' `"s Fr k,f,a4' downtown site for Southlake was • % tr 1..4 t .'; ;' .q, L. a great way to preserve and '1* t N+1*"+•t,�4"" '''1.. m t ':;u,*4 protect the veryreasons manye �, I' =.,.,•: .74i*` r.S .. i � „ ":y'; '••`.:s i; arc ,... people move here. "It will give a i ..$4.'4 .' it l F.rI, tt4,,,,4,,,.. ,, • us an identity and maintain the rt' ,f+y, ,"1-'"`",, small town atmosphere we all ,, * °' r1 I' i II e 4` j'�w.`'"`, �jjVFF T�` want,"he said. "I love the way t` .., r. ,,, i� c Yr 1&P• r ,r,wt,' .tie• .."�` Southlake was 40 years ago,but ,,,,j}$ MI+s`. fl,..tt ,n v, now we have to do our best to make out city better." Phase I of Town Center will include the "We on the council realize the need for balance in "Downtown" area in the lower left and the development. Let's take regional retail development along Hwy.114. advantage of this opportunity and do it right," said Mayor Stacy. • The council discussed and addressed concerns brought forward out of Planning and I Zoning about the many variances I requested of the developer, and I 5 ^ recommendations made by staff. I I L () The council had held a work I ( 0 Q session with Town Center representatives the night before I Ownby Lane O where a number of concerns-had I I been elevated: I I The developers stand is that these variances are necessary I I to give them the flexibility to I I i1 W build structures that everyone will I 1 be proud of. Brian Stebbins,of Rialto I Development told the council at I I the work session, "what we are I J showing you is what we intend to build,but I can't give you details Southlake Blvd. at this point. You will have the opportunity to see detailed plans numerous times before any The location of Foxborough. construction begins. I have rio hidden agenda." Mayor Stacy ended the work session with the same enthusiasm for the project that he opened the council meeting with. "I'm excited about it,what a great opportunity for the city." • In other action: The council passed the amendment to the sign ordinance deleting readerboard signs as acceptable unless council grants a variance. They also rejected a developers agreement with Southlake Woods,a development proposed at Continental Blvd. and S.Peytonville Rd. • Timarron from page 3 Dove Rd. pacts and that an accurate Traffic ' z Impact Analysis could be done A I• B , only at the time a development t D' plan is submitted. Only then _ _ would they have specific land N uses identified and the resulting !� 3 traffic impact. N a They did provide assur- • W ances regarding their intent for traffic flow. Tract I will have Tract I primary access off of Highway 114 and Dove Road. North White Chapel will be a secondary access road. The potential also " Tract II exists for Kirkwood to cbe ex- a tended south from Solana, V Z bisecting this tract. 0 Tract II will have its 3 A • B I Primrose Ln. a major entry points on Highway z • 114 and White Chapel with lesser m access off of Carroll Avenue C D Highway 114 will serve ' as primary access for Tract III = wr,roewai+.. with Kimball Avenue serving as a .s......*--A . 1 j ° secondary route and E. Highland providing only a minor level of N access. y "Internal circulation '4P, patterns will orient traffic for easy • access to Highway 114,"said Mr. Jerke, "keeping side street traffic to a minimum." The commission also East Highland went through each specific land use possibilitiy with the Timarron A people, and the citizens presentNZ added their input in an effort to ' . M eliminate those which are • • D 3 objectionable. Some common Cground was found and many'uses —will only be considered through a Specific Use Permit(SUP). This means Timarron would have toappear before the P & Z in apublic hearing with a detailed plan of the proposed use before it - would be allowed. "This team has been in Southlake since 1988 and we take a lot of pride in that," said Mr. Jerke. "We want to achieve a bal- ance between the desires of the and for that we are grateful,and we "We made a lot of progress tonight, community and the eventual coin- too have made some concession, but there are still some major issues pletion of the project." but this is a starting point not an to address in this case." Charles Kinnard,who rep- ending point." Timarron is scheduled to resented homeowners adjacent to Commissioner Rex Potter, come before the P&Z at its January Tract tii said, "Timarron has who chaired the work session, 9, 1997 regularly scheduled addressed many of our concerns summed up the meeting by saying, meeting. .f .fit ...5 i •.a City of South lake,Texas STAFF REPORT January 3, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-136 PROJECT: Second Reading / Ordinance No. 480-223 Rezoning and_Concept Plan/Foxborough (Submitted as Fox Glen) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 ORIGINAL REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning change on property described as approximately 23.7 acres being Tract 3F and approximately 0.19 acres being a portion of Tract 3E in the W. W. Hall Survey,Abstract No. 695 and an approximate 48.89 acre Concept Plan including the 23.89 acres of the zoning change and approximately 25.01 additional acres,that acreage being a revision of the Concept Plan for Country Meadows as approved by Council in August of 1990. This request proposes 63 residential lots (this number was modified from 63 to 64, then back to 63), one. commercial lot with Cl zoning to remain, one lot zoned 01 and • designated as common area and 3 additional common areas. AMENDED REQUESTED CTION: Zoning change on property described as approximately 23..7 acres being Tract 3F in the W.W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. A Concept Plan will be considered on Tract 3F and approximately 21.72 acres described as the northern portion of Tract 3E in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695, previously zoned "SF-20A" zoning and approved as Country Meadow Estates; approximately 1.72 acres zoned"0-1"Office District; and approximately 1.57 acres zoned".C-1"Neighborhood Commercial District. LOCATION: North side of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709),approximately 1140' west of the intersection of East Southlake Blvd. and North Carroll •. Ave. • OWNER: Beulah Cross do Ben Muir (Tract 3F) and Homei Liao and Jai Her Hwang, Trustees (Tract 3E) APPLICANT: ,Crumbaker Development, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District QUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential 7A-1 LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential (may include limited low intensity S office and/or retail uses) Mixed Use(may include office buildings,hotels,and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Residential Areas (Any Single Family District) NO. NOTICES SENT: Forty-one (41) notices were sent. Because over notification did occur, those responses noted with an asterisk (*) are those included in the calculation for the supermajority vote requirement. RESPONSES: Thirteen (13) written responses were received within the 200' notification area: • *Candace Harris, 920 Ownby Lane, Southlake, opposed. See attached letter dated October 6, 1996, addressing the impact of the proposed development on other SPIN#10 neighborhoods, the "C-1" lot, and the builder of the subdivision. • *R.T. Blair, 850 Ownby Lane, Southlake, opposed. "Improper drainage. Traffic safety." See attached letter. - • *Kenneth Clifford, 2576 Oak Road, Southlake, opposed. • Resident details an assessment for drainage and current traffic flow. See attached letter. • • *Jim and Becky Settles, 410 Southview Trail, Southlake, opposed. Concerns posed by residents include drainage issues, extension of Ownby, the quality of homes, and road conditions. • • See attached letter. A letter of opposition exhibit received November 7, 1996, addressing the extension of Ownby Lane to service Foxborough, the Foxborough Development being.based on • an asphalt roadway, and drainage issues was signed by 39 • (thirty-nine) residents. Of these responses, nine (9) were within the 200 notification area. Note that one of these • signatures had previously responded (C. Harris). Please see attached letter marked "Letter A." One hundred two (102) responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • Kenneth & Amelia Gardner, 550 Bentwood Lane, Southlake, opposed. "1. Density of homes adjoining the Lake Wood Acres addition (my subdivision) should be lower - i.e., larger lot sizes. Otherwise, my property value would be adversely affected. 2. Developer should • provide street stub access via revised plat to the Lake Wood Acres addition ... for future development of the lots adjoining the lake." See attached letter. 7A-2 • Carolyn Hayes, 807 East Southlake Blvd., Southlake, did not • register opposition, but offered concern about the initial appearance and future maintenance of Common Area No. 1, across from her home on Southlake Blvd. Mrs. Hayes submitted two letters, both are attached. • Tom Miller, Diamond Ltd.4217 Breenbrier Dr., Dallas, Texas, in favor. • Carol A. Livezey, 650 Bentwood Lane, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Too high a density of home building, questions about water drainage and water flow that will affect us, no buffer between our lot and theirs." • David & Catherine Moberg, 503 San Juan Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed." "I do not feel that this change is necessary for the common good of the city of the Southlake nor its residents or property owners." See attached letter. • James & Elaine Wood, 1040 Diamond Blvd, Southlake, Texas, opposed.. "Lots too small, unknown house sizes and price ranges. Would like it tabled until DCE Homeowners can meet with the developer." • Verne H. Rainey, 1020 Diamond Blvd, Southlake,. Texas, opposed. "This will decrease the property value in Diamond Circle, Mission Hills and other nearby developments." • A letter of opposition was received November 7, 1996, addressing the extension 'of Ownby Lane to service Foxborough, the Foxborough Development being based on an asphalt roadway, and • drainage issues was signed by 39 (thirty-nine) residents. •Of these responses, thirty (30) were outside the 200 notification area.' Note that one of these signatures had previously responded (C. Harris). Please see attached letter marked "Letter A." A petition of opposition, received November 14, 1996, was signed by residents of 65 properties in the Mission Hill Estates and • Diamond Circle Estates subdivisions.' Of these responses, all 65 are outside the 200' notification area. Please see attached letter marked "Letter B." • P & Z ACTION: . October 17, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table until the November 7, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. November 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 14, 1996; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the December 5, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. 7A-3 December 5, 1996; Approved (5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated November 27, 1996, amending Item #6 • (deflection in the common line between Lots 27 & 28, Block 1) to allow as shown; removing drive into Lots 1 & 2, Block 1; place drive/common access on the west portion of Lot 1, Block 1; change "Cross Court" to "Cross Lane"; accepting applicants commitment to minimum home sizes in deed restrictions; accepting applicants commitment restricting Lot 1, Block 1 (zoned "C-1") to "0-1" uses in deed restrictions; change bufferyard on Lot 2, Block 2 to Type "K" bufferyard along F.M. 1709; planting and landscape in all common areas as shown in exhibits presented; landscape as shown - on Lots 1 & 2, Block 1; provide 4" caliper trees, 6' walk and berried plants in Lot 7, Block 3; COUNCIL ACTION: December 17, 1996; Approved (7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated December 13, 4996, amending Item #6 (deflection in the common line between Lots 27 & 28, Block 1 and Lots 6 & 7, Block 3) to allow as shown; changing the required planting materials in Lot 1, Block 2 being the Common Area east of the entry along F.M. 1709 to reflect a bufferyard "K" level (as a.minimum) and permitting that the plantings may be dispersed throughout the common area rather than just within the 20' bufferyard; bufferyards and landscaping shall be per the exhibits •presented at P & Z meeting and shown to Council; requiring 4" caliper trees, .6' sidewalks and berried plants in Lot 7, Block 3 being the Common Area along the extension of Ownby,Lane; deleting. the requirement for a bufferyard along the head wall of Common Area No.-'1, providing a common access easement to the commercial lot in Diamond Circle Estates to the west; and directing Staff to initiate rezoning of the "C-1" lot at the southwest corner to "O-1". STAFF COMMENTS: • The applicant has met all the. items in Concept Plan Review .• Summary No.'1 dated October 11, 1996, Concept Plan Review No. . 2 dated November 1, 1996, Concept Plan Review No. 3 dated November 27, 1996 and Concept Plan. Review No. 4 dated December 13, 1996 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Concept Plan Review No. 5 dated January 3, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-136ZC.WPD . • 7A-4 - , LETTER A November 5, 1996. • Planning and Zoning Commission c/o Karen Gandy City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue 1 Southlake.,TX 76092 Dear Ms. Gandy: • This letter is being generated in reference to the P8:7 meeting scheduled for November 7, 1996: in particular two cases on the commission's agenda - ZA 96-137 and ZA 96-136. The following comments and observations reflect a large consensus of those residents currently residing in the SouthView development. . . As residents, parents and tax payers we are greatly concerned by the implementation of the proposed residential development put forth by David McMahan and Tom Mathews (Crumbaker Development). It is clear that the following issues will negatively impact the safety-of our neighborhood and our residential property values. • The extension of Ownby Lane to service Foxborough: . • The Developer estimates to plot 67 home sites with an average lot size of> '/2 acre. One access to • this.development will be off 1709 and one through SouthView via Ownby. Given that Diamond Circle.Estates and the Timarron extension to 1709 will cause more (access),congestion on 1709, common sense and the path of least resistance dictates that the new residents of Foxborough will . 0 use SouthView to gain access to either the 114 or 1709 via the Development's connection to Carroll. This will not only be a concern during the Monday to Friday Commuting period but weekends, as well, when the development takes shape on the Fast side of Carroll. This is further compounded by any proposed linkage of the East side Carroll development to Home Depot, Kroger, etc. The impact of this will cause major safety concerns for our children and for (SouthView) residents accessing the street(s).from their driveways.. Most of us chose Southlake as the place to raise our children given the city's predisposition as a safe place for learning and growing. Ignoring the issue of increased traffic flow flies in the face of this city's quality of life attraction. A number of solutions to this situation are possible: • 1. By increasing the lot size (Foxborough) to 1 acre there will be a tremendous decrease in the flow of traffic that(potentially) could be put through Southview. 2. Foxborough proposes another entry/exit point that will not negatively impact the SouthView development. At the SPIN meeting held Monday evening at the Solana Education Center, David McMahan made it clear that he was flexible to another potential entry/exit point. • The Foxborough Development being based on an Asphalt roadway We are not aware of any recent upscale developments that have Asphalt as the basis for their road construction. As it stands right now the proposed Ownby extension will see Ownby go from Concrete in SouthView to Ashpalt in Foxborough. Clearly this will detract from our property values. 411 ' Continued........./2 onnu ......... REDNOV 0 7 1996 7A-5 ......2/ 4110 In addition to the physical change from concrete to Asphalt will be the residue which will be deposited (tracked) on the concrete in the summer months when Asphalt becomes overly soft and tacky. There is only one solution to this problem and it requires the Developer to change from Asphalt to concrete if a linkage with SouthView exists. , ♦ Drainage Issues - We are all aware through either personal experience, experience of friends or through various articles that one of the greatest issues facing Southlake is drainage. It was evident at the meeting that a serious drainage problem exists on the proposed development. Given that both SouthView and Diamond circle flow water onto this property any proposed development faces a difficult task in dealing with this situation. As potential neighboring residents we are asking the City for a thorough"Do Diligence"on the issue of drainage for this proposed development. For those of us who attended the Developers meeting we did not come away with.a comfortable assurance that they know how to handle the situation. Both SouthView and Diamond Circle residents who surround this parcel of land do not wish to become the gate keepers to the Southlake version of Atlantis. Nor do we imagine that the city wish to take responsibility for authorizing the rezoning without the recommendations of an independent organization who specializes in such drainage related problems. . . In summary, there are enough.issues pertaining to safety and potential impact on neighboring • property values to delay the passing of.the proposed rezoning by P&Z for ZA'96-137 and ZA 96- • 136. We ask, as a unanimous body of neighboring residents; that this issue be re evaluated by the Developer and the City before it continues any further. 0 Sincerely, Th sidents-ef-Sout1A iew i III • 7A-6 , • . .. tr..... , .. III LETTER B • REC'C NOV 141996 Petition to Deny Zoning Change for Foxborough; Ref. No. ZA96-136 We, the Homeowners of Mission Hilrs, are opposed to the Zoning Change as requested for the following reasons: 1) The plan does not offer any distinctive or aesthetically pleasing uses for the property. It's primary design appears to be maximizing the number of residential properties that can be squeezed onto the property. 2) The request for medium density zoning is not congruent with surrounding developments; there are one+ and multi-acre residential sites on the immediate west and north sides of this property. This property, as proposed,would diminish the value of those properties; and by extension, the value of those developments. 3) The proposed extension of Ownby Lane would create a significant traffic hazard on FM1709, since it would create a shortcut from 1709 to Carroll Blvd. With the level of current and impending development in this area, it is not hard to visualize the number of vehicles which would be traversing that neighborhood. That also raises significant concerns about potential residential criminal activity in both Southview Estates'and the proposed Foxborough, due to the increased traffic and access. 4) The proposed Common Area in the center of the development is, in fact, a drainage area for the development to the iiest. With development on the north,.south, and east of the Common Area; it raises questions about the ability of that ace to handle the increased run-off that will occur. And it is obvious that that area cannot be used for any purpose then than drainage. 5) There are numerous large mature trees on this property along the north border. This development, as planned,would remove most of those. That has a negative environmental impact; especially, when as a city, we are requiring developers to install landscaping and trees. 6) The proposed commercial/retail use for two non-residential lots in the concept plan is absolutely unnecessary and is not in keeping with the surrounding residential areas. 7) This developer currently has two other projects within 1.5 miles both east and west of this development. Maintaining development activity on all three at one time may cause one or more to receive less than adequate attention to detail and quality. • 0 . , . .., • .'". • : , . 7A-7 • J. E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC. RECD NOV 201996 GINEERS • PLANNERS 6"COMMERCE • SUITE 104 • SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 • (817) 488-3313 November 20, 1996 • Mrs. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: ZA 96-136 Foxborough Zoning Request Dear Mrs. Gandy . At the request of our client and the property owner,, we respectfully withdraw our application for rezoning of the •0.186 acres tract in the referenced zoning case. Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. Truly ours, 4100 Jo n E. Levitt, P.E. • 7A-S ('1 Candace Harris 920 Ownby Lane Southlake 0P Texas 76092 hone(817)329-3216 • October 06, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission G"O OCT 8 1996 CIO Karen Gandy ilk 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake,Texas 76092 Dear Karen, Please consider this letter at the P&Z meeting scheduled for October 17,1996. Unfortunately I will be out of town, and not able to attend the meeting. Please allow this letter to serve as evidence of my opposition to ZA 96-137 and ZA 96-136. I have several concerns regarding the information that I was provided regarding the above-referenced cases. I feel it is.premature for the Commission to consider these cases at this time. I think that, prior to submitting the above request to the Planning and Zoning Commission a presentation should be made to SPIN 10 for resident input. As you know SPIN 10 encompasses Lakewood, Southview,Diamond Circle and Mission Hills. The . • proposed development will have an impact on all of these neighborhoods..This meeting 0 s not taken place and apparently no meeting is planned by the applicant. The second concern touches on the C-1 lot located at the southwest corner of the planned development. As drawn, this lot will be adjacent to three residential lots.The . commercial lot should be down zoned to a residential use. • - The third concern I have touches who will ultimately be building the subdivision.I feel this subdivision should be built by custom builders that are both familiar with, and have a history in this area. Additionally I may have concerns with the location of the large common area,the size of the lots and the anticipated drainage plans. I have discussed these cases with my neighbors and at this juncture we have a lot of questions with no one to answer them. We, as a community, would like an opportunity to learn more about the applicant's plans. Even if I was going to be in town,I do not think a Commission meeting is the proper forum for this type of informational meeting.I need to have the above, and other questions, answered before I can support these cases. For the above reasons, and others,I would ask that the Commission table this item until such time as these, and other issues, can be explored by the residents that will be affected by the proposed changes. Thank you for your consideration of the above. 1 erely, dace Harris 0-W 7A-9 nck� - ' • Candace Harris 920 Ownby Lane Southlake .4 4111) Texas 76092 iAt:h0P.aYfStA4tt Phone(817)329-3216 November 04, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission C/O Karen Gandy 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 -Dear Karen, Please consider this letter at the P&Z meeting scheduled for November 7,19-96. Unfortunately I will be out of town, and not able to attend the meeting. I am interested in two case on the Commission agenda. They are ZA 96-137 and ZA 96-136. I would like to respectfully request that the commission change the lot sizes from 1/2 acre minimum to 3/4 acre minimum. Lakewood,Diamond Circle and Mission Hills all have 1 acre minimum lots. Requiring Foxborough to meet a 3/4 acre minimum would • make a nice transition to Southview,and not be overly onerous on the developer. The second recommendation I would make would be to require the house size to be a minimum of 3,000 square feet. I feel this would also help insure quality, custom builders in this subdivision. ii• Thank you in advance for your consideration on the above. Sincerely, 0 a) -1(-. Candace Harris 111 RED N 0 V 0 6 1996 7A-10 • Ken Gardner • 550 Bent Wood Lane Southlake, Texas 76092 October 11,.1996 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: ZA 96-136 & ZA96-137 Gentlemen: I will be unable to attend the public hearing on October 17,1996, • concerning the Preliminary Plat for Fox Glen - reference numbers ZA96-136 & ZA96-137. My neighbors will help to represent my views; • In the current plan (Attached) I am OPPOSED to the proposed platfor the following reasons: 1. Density of homes adjourning the Lake Wood Acres addition (my subdivision) should be lower- i.e., larger lot sizes. Otherwise, my property value would be adversely affected. • 2. Developer should provide street stub access via revised plat to the Lake Wood Acres addition (my subdivision) for future development' of the lots adjourning the lake. During the October 17 public hearing, my neighbors - Broadaway and Dille - will represent my position. Thanks for your considerations. Sincerely, Sincerely, y *"`° 47'7VVgid a/M1/%4: "//144 Kenneth N. Gardner Amelia L. Gardner Attachment REC'D OCT 151996 7A-11 • Ct( QoQ C,D ((+; .! f A i,s6 W1vVd .i1 iv � l1 rTh r'i, _tom 11 Nov., 1996 807 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake,TX 76092 Planning&Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake,TX 76092 REFERENCE NO. ZA 96-136 • OUR CONCERNS: • 1) Common Areas#1  as indicated on Preliminary Plat"Foxborough" dated 31 Oct. 1996(copy of this Preliminary Plat attached and Common Areas#1 & • 3,hi-lighted in yellow)REVISED ACCORDING TO PRELIMINARY PLAT DATED 07 NOV. 1996 WHICH HAS COMBINED COMMON AREAS#1 & • 3 INTO COMMON AREA#1 ONLY (copy of this Preliminary Plat attached • and Common Area#1 only,hi-lighted in pink) • S Since this area (formally these areas) are directly in front of our residence we are • concerned about their initial appearance and their future maintenance. We have been • in attendance at the last two P/Z meetings; however,time has not'allowed this reference number to be reviewd. We must be out of town this week, but we are very interested in the outcome of the.review; therefore, we are attempting to.voice our concerns via this • letter in Iieu of our personal attendance. Mr.McMahan has promised, upon two occasions,to provide us with a drawing of these • areas; however,we have not received this drawing as of this date. The first instance was . • during the SPENT meeting of 04 Nov,1996 and again during a telephone conversation • • • between myself and Mr..McMahan of 08 Nov,1996. During the SPIN meeting, referenced above,Mr.McMahan stated that COMMON AREA . #1 would have an additional 5 to 7 feet of soil added to that area"as it is now" and that COMMON AREA#3 would have an additional 8 feet of soil added to that area "as it is • now". . Also, at this meeting,Mr.John Levitt,Engineer of the development, stated that . both of these common areas would have berms which would look like the berms•surround • - ing the Southridge Addition located behind the Bank(north side). I do not remember the name of this bank; however; it is the one located directly across from the High School on FM 1709 and Peytonville. Also, at this meeting, Mr.Mike Wright,Architect for the development, stated that the • landscaping of these common areas would be governed by the city master plan,P/Z req- uirements, etc.; however, upon speaking with Mr. Tom Elgin, city Community Development department,I have discovered this is not the case. I learned, during this conversation, that..Mr. McMahan, or any other developer for that matter, is not held to any standard on SF-20A, Single Family Residential Districts. Those standards apply to 7A-12 111 OPEN AREAS (10% of total land area)for PUD's only. The only type of standards which would apply to COMMON AREAS#1 &3 is the 10 foot buffer zone on FM 1709 and the fact that the variance between the Preliminary Plat and the Final Plat may not deviate more than 5%. After the completion of the addition the homeowners association would take over control of these COMMON AREAS and again are not governed by any city standards, per se. • OUR REQUEST IS: Mr.McMahan state,for the record, 1. that the eastern 3/4 portion of the berm of COMMON AREA#1, of Prelim Plat dated 07 Nov. 1996 (that portion indicated on the Prelim Plat dated 31 Oct. •1996 as Common Area #1) will be that of 5 to 7 feet additional soil and the landscaping, including the type, density, placement, size, etc. of the vegetation will be the same as the berm located behind the Bank, located across from the High School on FM 1709 and between that Bank and the Southridge addition. 2. that the western 1/4 portion of the berm of COMMON AREA#1, of Prelim Plat dated • 07 Nov. 1996(that portion indicated on the Prelim Plat dated 31 Oct. 1996 as Common Area #3) will be that of 8 feet additional soil-and the landscaping, including the type, • density, placement, size, etc. of.the vegetation will be the same as the berm located behind the Bank, located across from the High School on FM 1709 and between that Bank and.the Southridge addition. . 3. a date which Mr.Mahan will in fact, provide us with a copy of the drawing indicating the final appearance of COMMON AREAS# 1 &3,-as indicated on Prelim Plat dated 31 Oct. 1996 but REVISED as COMMON AREA #1 ONLY, as indicated on Prelim Plat dated 07 Nov. 1996. • • CejL's-Q-1 CL Sincerely, I� Carolyn . Hayes • Attach. cc: Crumbaker Development,Inc. • Attention: Mr.David McMahan 100 W. Southlake Blvd.,#320 Suite 234 Southlake, TX 76092 7A-13 • • MEMORANDUM TO: Planning&Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue • Southlake,TX 76092 " p FROM: Bill and Carolyn Hayes `--(`"'"c '�� 807 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake,TX 76092 DATE: 12 Nov. 1996 SUBJECT: REFERENCE NO.ZA 96-136 Please attach this to my letter dated 11 Nov 1996, regarding the above subject, as an update. ® • • OUR CONCERNS: • 1) REMAIN TILE SAME AS EXPLAINED IN 11 NOV. 1996'LETTER. • OUR REQUEST IS: Mr.McMahan state,for the record, 1. REMAIN THE SAME AS EXPLAINED IN 11 NOV. 1996 LETTER. • • 2. REMAIN THE SAME AS EXPLAINED IN 11 NOV. 1996 LETTER. • 3. Mr. McMahan did provide us with a drawing of the proposed berms on 11 Nov. 1996; • however,the drawing is of insignificant aid in determining the final appearance of the stated berms. The drawing.has no legend indicating any dimensions, etc. This is the • reason,we feel, that number 1 and 2 requests, of our letter dated 11 Nov. 1996, are so important; to establish.standards for those areas. RED N O V 111996 7A-14 • • • • • ••,) • • • CURS LINES OF PROPOSED STREET (FOXSOROUGH LANE) L INE OF PROPOSED IBERMS • LINE OF PROPOSED BERMS •1, .• • 4,-41 _se SIGNAGE SIGNA6E 4111 eitv, 41 Al • . "zif gla • • , •LINE OF EXISTING CURS • LINE OF HAYES DRIvEW44"1" AgR009 HWY. Ilos • • • • • RECD.NOVIIIM . . • • , 14 41) November 5, 1996. Planning and Zoning Commission do Karen Gandy City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake., TX 76092 i Dear Ms. Gandy: As citizens of Southlake and as Homeowners in SouthView,my wife and I are greatly concerned about the proposed residential development now referred to as Foxborough; ie: (ZA 96-136,ZA 96-137). We feel, as well as the majority of SouthView Residents that this development by Tom Matthews &David McMahan(Crumbaker Development)has been planned without consideration of Traffic Safety and Congestion, Proper Drainage, Property Values and overall Pride in what the Citizens of Southlake expect. • Traffic Safety& Congestion With the proposed construction of 114 and traffic congestion along 1709 (commute period)already reaching maximum capacity, Ownby Lane will now become the bypass/thoroughfare not only for residents of Foxborough but everyone trying to`Beat the Red-light". Add the Rialto Development • and the problem only worsens, not only from a traffic and safety standpoint, but an increase in street maintenance costs due to abnormal wear ant tear. This is "Big Bucks"for a City already experiencing growing pains. ♦ Drainage Drainage is one of the biggest problems Southlake has and there seems to be no immediate solution. Diamond Circle Estates and SouthView flow water into this proposed development: Mr. McMahan failed to give a proper remedy for this at the SPIN meeting held November 4,. 19.96. His • •. . . solution for a dumping area in Common area#16 and Common area#2 is unacceptable. This will only become a Health&Safety Hazard, an eyesore, and a haven for mosquitoes and snakes;. not to mention a severe decline in neighboring property values. As proposed,this development,has all the makings of another Love Canal(New York). This Band-Aid fix for drainage needs to be addressed. Maybe an independent study by an engineering group could provide answers to this situation. The cost of the study and other related expenses should be incurred by Mr. McMahan and Mr. Matthews (Crumbaker Development) • - This may prove whether or not they are serious about being responsible Developers concerned about the City of Southlake and its citizens. • REC'D NOV 0 71996 Continued........../2 7A-16 A, N. ......2/ Further to this, Mr. McMahan is presently occupied with redeveloping the Food Lion Shopping center for Tom Thumb. Should he receive the rezoning he desires for Foxborough and Crestwood Office Park, we are very apprehensive about his fiscal ability,personal desires and developmental skills to manage multiple projects. / We urge the city to please address these and other concerns that may arise. The future of Southlake is at risk should we allow Carte Blanche rezoning to occur. We eagerly await the Development of this property but in a responsible manner that will satisfy the concerns of all Southlake Citizens that are affected. Let us take this opportunity to show the.citizens of Southlake and surrounding communities that we have the ability to work together for a common cause that is beneficial to not only a few but all. • Sincerely, ,..... . • Ct r� n ,lis- - Mr. &Mrs. R.T. Bl~' 850 Ownby Lane 0 Southlake, Texas 761., 817-481-7189 • 411 7A-17 RE: ZA 96-136 and ZA 96-137 • November 6, 1996 Southlake Planning&Zoning Commission City of Southlake _ 667 N.Carroll Avenue Southlake,TX 76092 Dear Commissioners, I own the home at 400 Southview Trail in the Southview Estates Development.The rear of my property line meets the Eastern dividing line between the proposed Foxborough development and the Southview Estates development. My home is on the Northwest corner of Ownby and Southview Trail. I recognize that the development of the property behind my home will happen and do not disagree with the specific type of zoning that is being sought. I am an advocate of the continued development of both residential and commercial properties in my community that fully comply with municipal code while also maintaining the spirit of Southlake's corporate charter.However,in light of what little information I have received on the proposed Foxborough development,as well as what information I do not yet have, I have to oppose your recommendation of this rezoning and development concept to the City Council at this time. Instead,I recommend that specific engineering assessments be completed and the results shared publicly before any action be taken by your committee.Indeed, I believe that until the intelligence of the ' assessments outlined below is available,the Planning&Zoning Commission will not even be capable of making a decision that protects the interests of me,my family,and my neighbors. • Not in order of priority,I believe that the following actions are prerequisite to your decision: "�. "" �!� �i Tn;a-air-.y.....;,C"E' ;:�x..x� a' y3...a�C, . 3;'� 'a.,1 ii.G.tngni o xFoiaiip eli s:Drarn rirtitgineerrri P.t �� ' ' 1 What: An engineering study of Foxborough's drainage plan be commissioned to do a couple of things: 1) Review and document the efficiency and standards of the existing plan and highlight the risks of the proposed design. • 2) Produce a list of alternatives to the existing design,i.e.below ground ' . ' transport vs.concrete channels,routing,conservative"pitch- ' levels"/degrees. By Whom: A third-party engineering firm selected by the Planning&Zoning Commission and managed by the City Engineer. - Why: For the Southlake residents with a stake in the success of the engineering of this • development to understand what alternatives are available,where the risks are,and what standards,or more fundamentally,what design should be•recommended to the city council. It is obvious that the proposed plat poses unique drainage challenges that include - the fact it receives water from two neighboring developments.The existing proposal, which includes concrete channels running between my property and the Foxborough resident which backs up to me and the proposed plan of running all water to an overflow/drainage pond is nothing less than a complete surprise; I would expect this level of infrastructure from an unincorporated development,but not in Southlake. 40 Funded By: The applicant. REC'D NOV 0 7 1996 Page 1 of") 7A-18 RE: ZA 96-136 and ZA 96-137 'As'ses ent of,Iui act of Foxbi io'ii h's'Cacrent`Des ii ii ' 'i' 1 N ` ,11 What: A traffic-assessment of the impact of Foxborough's development on all interconnected . • developments be commissioned.Obviously,the current concept limits the affected communities to Southview Estates.The specific objectives of the assessment would be to: 1) Quantify the impact of Foxborough's development on the number of cars that will be regularly using both Foxborough Lane?.'nd Ownby Lane;the study should address at least a short-term view(3-3 years).These numbers should be shared publicly and also be measured against the thresholds that exist within Southlake's traffic policies. -2) Qualify the traffic-flow risks that exist as a result of the existing plan and propose solutions for each of these,i.e.speeding,visibility at corners, congestion and stubbing out streets toward Carroll Ave.in what are currently proposed to be Foxborough's Cross Court and Derby Court.. By Whom: A third-party engineering firm selected by the Planning&Zoning Commission and managed by the City Engineer. Why: To provide both the Planning&Zoning Commission and the local residents with the information necessary to form an accurate understanding of the impact of the Foxborough development on traffic flows and render intelligent decisions based on this. . Given the unique situation of both Foxborough and Southview Estates being bordered by major-arterial streets and the degree of commercial activity recently completed and planned,it is fundamentally necessary that to protect the health and safety of families in IIboth Foxborough and in Southview Estates that you require this assessment. Funded By: The applicant. . . • . While my recommendations may be construed by some as extreme,I am convinced that these actions represent the minimal effort necessary for us to make the claim in 1997 and every year after that we developed this land responsibly and intelligently.It is the unique qualities of this land(traffic&drainage), rather than my personal opinion,that mandates your endorsement of these recommendations.Our cumulative responsibility(yours-as a commissioner and mine as a citizen)extends beyond the protection of • • commuter logistics and'property values and includes the health and safety of our children;an issue that is inherent in both the traffic and-drainage issues. • It is plain to me that your quick recommendation to the city council without the prerequisite assessments of the developer's concept would be absolutely short-sighted and amount to a long-term disservice to all' • Southlake taxpayers. With all due respect,I trust that you recognize this,yet urge you to not dismiss the issues that I have raised here.As a taxpayer and advocate of responsible development,I look to you to protect the interests of my family and community. • Sincerely, \V Kenneth A. lifford • 817/258.1118 Day Phone Page 2 of 2 7A-19 • • • October 17, 1996 City of Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, TX 76092 RE:ZA 96-136 I am a resident of the City of Southlake,having owned the property at 503 San Juan for the past eight years. My property is adjacent to the property for which a zoning change is being considered under the reference number noted above. I am opposed to the zoning change as requested for the following reasons: . • 1. I do not feel that this change is necessary for the common good of the City of Southlake nor its residents or property owners. • 2. The request for medium density zoning is not in keeping with surrounding developments and;would likely have a negative impact on adjacent low density property owners. 3. The commercial/retail use planned for two non-residential lots in the proposed concept plan is absolutely unnecessary and is not in keeping with the surrounding residential areas. h. The development as proposed would create additional traffic safety . hazzards on.a portion of I-ighway 1709 that is already experiencing morning and evening conjestion. 5. I am concerned about the environmental impact of the.proposed development. There are numerous mature trees on this property which would be significantly affected by the proposed development as well as drainage issues that need to be more fully addressed. 6. And finally, and I realize this is purely opinion, I think the development as proposed is rather unimaginative and quite mediocre in its proposed use of • the land. It seems primarily designed to maximize the number of residential properties that can be created and sold rather than to create a more distinctive • and aesthetically pleasing use of the land for residential purposes which RECD O C T 171996 7A-20 City of Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission October 17, 1996 Page 2 would be in keeping with the character of both the surrounding developments as well as the larger community of Southlake. I urge you to reject this proposed change in zoning. I would be happy to consider other alternatives for the development of this property. Sin rely, David & Ca erine Moberg 503 San Juan Southlake, TX 76092 cc: Mayor Rick Stacy Southlake City Council Members • 7A-21 OCid_ .„0. ... _) ...... .., .: • November 6,1996 . Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake,Texas 76092 To Whom it May Concern: I am writing about my concerns to Reference No.:ZA 96-136. There are four areas where-I see major problems. *Drainage Issue There is a drainage ditch in the northwest corner of my lot that needs to be extended out to the property of the above reference. By raising the elevation to adequately handle my drainage problem,you•will create several problems. First you would create a drainage problem for our neighbors,and second, the loss of foliage and trees located on the back edge of my property line and my neighbors. ilo "Extension of Ownby • Extending Ownby into this'new development will create an unsafe environment for the people . - that live on Ownby. We consider our streets to be very safe. With more people using Ownby as . • an access road to get to Carroll,it only creates more traffic. Due to the number of small children it will only create an unsafe environment for the children to play. I would hope that everyone •that uses.Ownby would have the same respect as those that live on this street,but unfortunately . that is never the case. *Quality • . After meeting with Crumbaker Development Inc.,we feel that we have no assurance that the quality of homes will be as good as our development or better. All the houses that surround this property have been custom homes. They said that the cost of the lots will be so high that it will keep the tract home builders out. We just need some reassurance that the development company sells the property by the lot,not by the whole development. . Our association has hired.an outside management company to make sure that all homes are • abiding by our deed restrictions.This should help make are small development continue to give. • • Southlake the standard and quality that everyone in our community should be proud of. What . we would like to see is that Crumbaker Development be forced to use the same.outside • management company, or another similar company,in order to maintain the same enforcement of the deed restrictions in the future. • *Road Condition I have a major concern about the extension of Ownby to be Asphalt. As Ownby is right now the plans will see Ownby go from concrete to asphalt. Also we all know that in the summer asphalt • gets sticky and soft, this will resolve in that residue will deposit on to the concrete. There is only one solution and that would be that it must be changed to concrete. REC'D N 8 V 0 71996 7A-22 .s:i iziw.„4„,v „1 ,• ,.r.~w sm.ann:sstueunut taiwnuvnwu'xwntbnuc.n... ..a ru--^•n,.mow--__ _." ___._._. ...._._ N • r^ lioIf we cannot get the quality and the reassurance that all of the above items are being addressed, • then we oppose any plat for Fox Glen by Crumbaker Development,Inc. Very truly yours, • r im and Becky Settles ; 410 Southview Trail . Southlake,Texas 76092 '666'41 lidtitil--P- - . • • . . . , . . . • . . . . . . . . . . , • . . • . . • • . .. . . • S . . . • • 7A-23 • - PR,,.•.. 6C [ —I- I _'-- I 3 3 LAI�KIN H. 6UIV I�8 ! kr • i / j 3A105 0 4 s sr J4-J00 • `• I ' is 1 b f j el;. I:rsi A 3A3 56.33 I I' ��J , Al I1 IT— `L--...r-i-. - -ritintiy I :: 9 to i .-- �ff-- i.W ! 3A28 142 7 NO J .�� i; — ! ..:o-vsa:[ �g 3A1C1 i 3D . • /g 3858 Ac -. 1 •,,1, i� 382 3D 381 Icy �j i i i i i �• ti J I RN ; N0RTy/� 3u A. I ti`�7 }' 4A ! �1� ! i I I l 3A1D2 ,( • _ G "Cs�. S97 Ac e. `-r:I _.�....„. A5.." gi JACK D. 9.47 Ac I r !}�� I er I.; 25.406 Ac ; _ - D fi171I ,`f+"�: ,8`3EIA MC �Q`,1 ST 5 Ac j 39 Ac 843 Ac �4 Ac !,� ENTARY t3oivr.,.. 6 }R E I gRl`�" Y al. �V'" 1 4C1A + ...--..........--,PARP 1 9» Dp11 i n 1 �4cza 4c3 m ���\A [ ...�lot ( 4 4c r :•' 'I STREET � . y i EAST 401 MGR.ID.D S !® � • __ 8 884 ! i 1 1F 182 IA 1 J iS. ' — __1 EAST .MI .® 2, 883 EKE ... jx, 1 R o :1 BM! E3 +�" 3- H1�' `j 5 Ac i iir ' R :cl I il•-4' IA1!. •'` { •.'estA=,.,: 681A 5QU1 EMoI! Iu:i� G .,�R �a ■ ;^�,+ �I .- `.7 ''Y BBIC A Q !�{is` 1d64 h V'''i - rrA?? [ i i i ii] f 1 1D2iR7.�r I V. r .i 8818 na: ra,® 10 % i i i i I I� I 3A&3A2 �'[ ! .��•" . I 24.91 Ac �J 1 .c•. .-h!i-f-ri� . WV ! E e3.1 Ac a !°:. . i I ! i i i ! :41 1 1, = ! . A-M7 i i i � i - 1 --1,-1, -.[i.1 . 'f-,�/, • I --• i i i i i •N , 1 .i i P l ! I '1 ! I i i � 1.., '�.1,,,, .wr: y�. . •"pu. _-. /•• L- -1 i I i •i of -k I i I ! ! ii 1 1 �� i I 1 +I. ti i1 1 F , r I. i ; . ! - r 1 1 - ; i i j J / 28 7A tit I i i j `• \ ! i i i _ 11 �-•' ! ! ! i \ ``• Aid ' / Limits of zoningrequest .._1_.. _ 3 iW F'•It i I M I �� 111 i 1 ` >:5 • ti• r�, r, '; ; . i �. i �3' �---~!—at _.-- — }tom__ — 2 .z.---'1 1 . I • z 1 '1 , i ! n i i \ . 7114 'k:r °‘'g•rt .4.---. I ..."4,. - 1 1 i /1 I ( ! i I ; I ! 1 1 • / -iT.i.,!...A.:3 •-f--r.- ! 1 ; l 1 I 1• I I i 1 1 1 i i i 1 P , I 1 i i ! i i 1 i r i i i' ! i _ —i '! -• i I i 1 F•-- I 1 '1 I 1• I ,j - 1A ` T Iti--may 2s Ac 1 [ .1 [ 1 ;� • " • ;,. ` ! • . p_,'-t-._'1 I--.- • �3D3A YI3 3C i }.� \' •(Air" I 1 i •..%L"- . '3 At i i '`S, i • 7uan.m:Iymors,e 7.665 Ac 3.4 As �` ( '✓''. m - II % " . 1 i `- . 3D2A a•i 3D ,. _ 1 ao c ft.Fr'.�.t' • _ _ -- F_U 1709 • ii J'y•�C••J�.•.vim.r — - .-- --- -- - 3C SG SF SE SD SDI 502 5C 3A 3A1 3C 08, 4C 40•, 7A • 5:8�Ac -� �O� i 0 ,pE SDi 2"3M i 7 L 10 Ac 6 Ac ''flk3 Ac 4S7 Ac • k -• 30.6 Ac '} -ti iZC • � ' •^ _ 22.11 Ac • I 39. 302 Erl `• \ 1 1 [ 1 l 1 [ [ 1 • \ 1 / % 1 1 1 I I I I I ! i i 1 r [ 2A2 2A5 `. 2 .i .h• 1 V ,1 • , aaal.•:. \_________._ JK [[ _ 401 4 9` .;9: 1 i i ! 1. !r 0 ;i .J:IF: 2A18ri ....J.i \\ 1 1J C. i �. 261 1 , tr,1.:) 28 2D TRACT MAP ; , ' �•�. c!r m ...'• (-1 1:::.) Efe€, `,'O[.,•5 4 A� 51 !A. Ac .,:, / r�; N. i i i e I i 4.5 Ac peg a ib -\ - f i- . �` , 7A-24 �t �►. ADJACENT OWNERS SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#10 AND ZONING AL MORIN 5'- • j 0. 18 '-__3" ) • G 111 1 . u. l 19 3 . •J. -6 5 ` 1-` w x 20 B 2 4 � 1 B ' / � J ... • a ,A a 9 21 �i 9 z .m • 8 22' a m • Aibq 00- 84 9 3: -6 , . 10 . 8 A :, x rt 12 13 ! OFtNBf • i. 0 . \ . . 14 ��15 16 ; 1 i� R 3F is. Jc3 22.0 AC• . .18 0 F H 5 •1 O • •3 ` ifi 19 - 3 C1 TR 3 7.665 VI 2A 3A • 2B 9 .„1. T �_ f f ----�—= z 24/� 7066 '21 T�1 -- SOUTHLA%E b -- -------- 31 ------------ -- -----. --- . - --22. TR 5OZA f / linitalail. - TA1/ 0360 .< . 6 0 31 c1 .054 AC 32K 5c 29 _ 2" 25 TR 3B .017 502 2:03t® •'3-2 - • -1Q.D 098 Ac • 33- . ill/ • • , . • 26 1a/ ' 4• TR 3B1 • DI�G • ` • 1 ;28 `.� i 2.773 AC •• 1113 • _ - l _ .J . . .91 Q , 7A-25 • Adjacent Land Owners ZA96-136 and ZA96-137 # Owner Zoning # Owner Zoning 1* K. Gardner SF-lA 29* State of Texas AG 2* D. Dille SF-lA 30* W. Rucker AG 3* B. Mckee SF-lA 31* State of Texas AG 4* D. Anderson SF-lA 32* State of Texas AG 5* R. Lawrence SF-20A • 33* Timarron AG 6* L. Mahon SF-20A 34 J. Baker AG 7* T. Harbour SF-20A 35 J. Baker SF-lA 8* L. Sisco SF-20A 36 State of Texas SF-1A 9* M. Massad ' SF-20A . 37 J. Baker . • SF-1A 10* J. Settles SF-20A 38 State of Texas PUD 11* D. Murphey SF-20A 39 State of Texas PUD 12* K. Clifford ' • SF-20A 40 Timarron PUD 13* J. D'amico SF-20A 41 Timarron PUD 14* R. Blair SF-20A 42 State of Texas PUD 15* L.Naugher SF-20A 43 State of Texas C3 16* ' D. Akers SF-20A 44 Diamond Ltd. C3 17* D. Harris SF-20A 45 S. Murphey SF-lA 18* Mendez Ltd. AG 46 J. Wood SF-lA 19* Mendez Ltd. AG 47 F. Decinti SF-lA 20 * 48 W. Quinn SF-1A 21* State of Texas AG 49 D. Clark SF-1 A 22* State of Texas C3 50 R. Poucher SF-1A 23* Southlake . C3 51 J. Ridenour SF-1 A Partnership 24* B. Cross AG 52 V. Phillips SF-lA 25* State of Texas AG 53 . E. Silva SF-lA 26* W. Rucker AG 54 D. Moberg SF-lA 27* State of Texas AG 55 D. Wiviott SF-lA 28* B. Hayes AG 7A-26 * * Denotes owners notriea for ZA96-136 only City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY .se No: ZA 96-136 Review No: Five Date of Review: 1/03/97 Project Name: Concept Plan for SF-20A Zoning - Foxborough (formerly submitted as Fox Glen) 48.877 in the WW Hall Survey Abst. No. 687 • APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Crumbaker Development J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. / 100 W. Southlake Blvd. #320 726 Commerce Street, Suite 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone : (817) 329-6996 - Phone : (817) 488-3313 Fax : (817) 329-6996 Fax : (817)488-3315 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/30/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. .: .:::::n.:w:::::.�::.;:v.::�rr::.vw::;;:x::.�:::::n�::::n}:?:•:v:..:tin..;.}:v}:ni:ix:::::.::.•.�:::.x r:•<.}::4}: ... ..1•....... .:.1.. .... ..h t.... ... ...... ......... 1. Provide an additional interior lot line in Lot 2, Block.1 and in Lot 1, Block 2 (common areas) along the existing 0-1 zoning line for tracking purposes.As currently configured,this will result in a split lot zoning. Provide the required bufferyards along all non-residentially zoned boundaries of Lot 2,Block 2 and • • Lot 1,Block 2(Common Areas)according to the requirements of Ordinance 480, Sections 42 and 43. 3. The deflection in the common line between Lots 27 &28, Block 1 and between Lot 6 and 7,Block 3 does not appear to•meet the intent of the perpendicular/radial side lot line requirements. (P & Z Action 12/05/96:Amend to allow as shown)Please note that Lots 6& 7, Block 3 were not addressed in the previous plan review or the P & Z motion. * Note that in the Land Use Data summary,Lot 2,Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 zoned 0-1 "Office" are shown as common areas; however,the residential density calculation does not include these lots. * Please be aware that review of building setbacks along street frontages is not part of this plan review. This issue will be addressed on the subsequent Preliminary Plat review. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 1/13/97. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. Z ACTION: October 17, 1996;Approved(5-0) applicant's request to table until the.November 7, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. • 7 A-27 City of Southlake,Texas November 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 14, 1996;Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the December 5, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. • December 5, 1996; Approved (5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated November 27, 1996, amending Item #6 (deflection in the common line between Lots 27& 28, Block 1) to allow as shown; removing drive into Lots I & 2, Block 1;place drive/common access on the west portion of Lot 1, Block 1; change "Cross-Court"to "Cross Lane"; accepting applicants commitment to minimum home sizes in deed restrictions; accepting applicants commitment restricting Lot I, Block 1 (zoned "C-1") to "0-1" uses in deed restrictions; change bufferyard on Lot 2, Block 2 to Type "K" bufferyard along F.M. 1709; planting and landscape in all common areas as shown in exhibits presented; landscape as shown on Lots 1 & 2, Block 1;provide 4" caliper trees, 6' walk and berried plants in Lot 7, Block 3; * Denotes Informational Comment Crumbaker Development J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. L:IWP-FILESIREVI96196-136CP.4 • S 7A-28 • • • ! • . • PROPERTY Discranotf I I I I r, •A. I I ---;-- ;N - a D mn I I I-. -__-'• '.I I_1'' •, I [ >. I M AM a.IM,M.bad r A.w a lord Avw.Oft ILIA.NMI.SJMY.lew.a an. IliI Ix i I s 1A-,r n i ?want ten.Tea .Yuri M a xm cort.owe R ,, ..•_...11 LAKE MODS AOQ ADOTIv1-10.351 I I �1 Y vaun]der a..t..„Yy T.°w1A..(D"iai e°{.)Sal ramDRauax 3� I 1 e ,; COtKF.PT...;..__a1r i3-]a�u7,Pa]. I I I AMy rrm Poel.Yly e�.°f.e q.�w a::..rbna°m[,..' I I s Da .J Ln. PLAN I� IJI"T.M M J F / �'I ,. I.[.rI^ Le:-•, _I \ boot u. �....•. n. sm-a-.w' the __ZL -- ' i •A. LOw OflL • „ I 7 )n.y y __��_ t,• / ! ILL HpF.y�W Crr rm N NYYu�. .+!E•hi pRiL'aY�mr�1 ,_- / / L-= ' s pID'O5•[ IC•Im ti.�\ / ('t -- - Than.MA.common[r.Y W lloo! Pot w meld Cray b.c1 N.M al .�,�/ 7=�_;=i� .. r.1]r -.ter' [erloot[ „../ II wr..,o rlrwl..e[..awr.Es.1.T/Yw r"�.I e..wFl.n ur...•b wr a m • Ll0 .....CONCEPT a]aa' 73 'vaN Aw•Antra - .� r'• i. m • �� -_ -_- _. Pb.[ b D•Mt..e.NN F VMum.]ea1]),rt.' J[ -' �/ \ ")Ae r i r•w. •, . laq in-cr _____IVrIT•i r_ / 50.1441E10-PRASE l :'aa N buu.Trr(P( J oral ie..nn.rr rNwM eor,r M We Lb. Trrorll _ \ I. I • I ri] r, CA!•A•.St./nee x..p Don w mru..t v..w a.vb o..aen;r \ II1590M an.FYTAI[9 I! • ■ L I� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ASCO.TX 1Ao•MIA•!r•..a.m b Tab UM•Fad bon tllm oral uW C Trod 5.01 - LOCATION315IBEdBO der. Woad 10 7.3.55 an Yen of [u1► fa \\ P.M_CC0.R I )'1•t7 V7 m1. V.k .n•:V•i sta V. sine M.o.v. . '5-V• +fi*I -- -- I I I MICE. iA.AwJ/baMM.-Ta•I mon..b O.Ml rai.T Cott.•A',9b./7N. ZWm Y-1 i I V. ' _ ,a.. \\ LU3 1 'f.....J(R.., + _n - i k 5 I I LawDE7t^ ,. - •• j S I • L DI mn4.MA 0 M Rotor.r'�'.441•• ins 1 w Me Cron tat[.d1 01 p•. \` Vx `J I /Ile- --- ew I z 1 - Pt.I rl a.l�"i.aAw Do."s.,uw.�=''S�1�`�u.ou`xl.maei, - \ I I r :� _�� 1 i 9 i I C.N01•A'.9N•/1310.PA.% ` -L_�`L__-_f___ �-_ __ __ TON ` _ I .-+_-- 1.00 NA.w ra.N.b r4 U N ors l w Rust...Stan 50.01 Irons •-1 A "I --)I atm r. -n..T- n>IY um. n --_ 1�'Yrp�9 V I ;I __, I ]D tnna.1[monde Mw CO27[Iw Y en ice.F Y.Ns adv..Rant el W 1 : S.W.put Cw n Mo..a nm 0...eR r / I 1 t,r 0 I. __ __ _' �I , .e .1 / // O..50.1,DE asoroos Oe.D.el I.7al u�rs Can 1131 I W[b].>!'VAT / 11n �u I I / V..yN ..1.4 c Por Y N AN r.mdN F Y.Rm.4.141....a.]m.Donor CT.: / �), I. •VIA V. 04...M r,:v. Rlr V. .. . L---- 11.01.IA•AM mr.rr.n bold Cn.a Sal nb 1..7 DW SA.m dog.aE I.YUI. v ' I p mS)5___I 1 A-6".''.� I__ -- w... PJ[E..l.Vl.w foot b a meta arlr a r.Oa Its[an D.wA 11.-.1-Ra) -' L A.. I ■ L ■ I ■I■ ■' I o ' I I MdA.7 M.1701. 1 I_ • V. - r -.q=emu. i TM..MA IN R.[.x[m-41-•.r Re.V dq..50..,1.13.R.M.M.650. [ ;I pa. ,m • 1 y - I I ran b On NW M D.7D.Ay w wa.DAp•e..Z17 eon.o1 brLL el I I ... ~ ■ ..t1 '.�.O:ii ! I1•-`--_-- . . 1 [ :u1Eo s-xA 74. >- W.WILL SURVEY,A-687 -'� ` y�HEa(.ESY' ✓ �± oxNHY u.NE �- ' 7 i I x e..RH.a I A _ ... \' •sag at. LMIH?J' I -I • t\.) 'I ..O� dl • _-U5 --1---+- . I • I'$ n•••+O V• t as vA C0N10N,'ARE& ISAN 17.=r2 I• I 11 I• . PAMWO -FC£ESTATES 'I , 4 "__...-___1 ?I_-_-. /r sc v - 1 I caRPE DATA • , , _ ♦ -- 7: .a[rx.•171[_ OIr.E No. DELTA PIA3 70.001.011; .Pa> 11 Af�.__` • n9u__ I �P2 PAT.. • 2,t ! i \ 'C' il 2a.. " MEP -37T0JT- TOV-- hum,.,--lnl..1 n•-1 I 4545.Y7.7.m-17].A'207 . L0 S 8 14 al. '1 e:_ �,a ..zw.v. ."T '! a •r•s•Y max•�u.m n1.n• [ tl , p ) V / ,,, ..n:e . .r s•.r visor In AS aza• pAr V. �. Tj EUA v.. B a RT x•.r COO.'171m'23I.71' Law DER -•« TONED Sr-ZOAr'. a a na V.- a.�v. �•.�- " p.lr v. - a 00]a•iS 17zM'1xIT 27410 -AJ_______J••'. .. uD 0; I -1 -......_ 7 9D aa•aT•190' our a]➢v I __.r._,lHd *mPI:.:\.as[_ s 1 `'-V -.Aa_ _ a Dr 21•If 41.ea n.m• 5145 LAND USE DATA "zi- -_VII'• SURVEY 5 r.C___' .vem_.._..w -- 8 , 44r<�,D.� r A-695 • .o x•z 1U.11.1•s.7A•]De DO• CROSS AREA o 45.577 ACRES I -- 'SAE.,..;,� -.�f- J 1` .r 7T a57ao.ov Sans MIS. 1 Go ammo 1.e 7A I L ■ I ['' ;�■ I I i - _ '^iCR053 LANE------- 11 .T 4s•.5 115000.7M.7r 191.10 ER6nno of ..__.'� ,EI n MCMI¢LTD. uuP RADO-E0 043TED 55'11.7) AaW 19 AC [ I [ 1 , tun V. ~'j`'1 a. Ini.' / f.O0+m11°rmmcras Serer) i'ii fKe I 0 - 1A•rT.ss. I I _lent 1 VOL Ixsl.Pe.0 T01.UM Rao AC. 12 we I, '' . f N, a 8 Ile I n 8 le inaoAo ' u nAp a..R nA v. IJ V.R ` NON-REMEENTIA1 AREA _ 1 •;�)r f o•:' ./. r iv' - EpyR ar. TOTAAPprllp1-a 1.1.1.1AfA(CI) I'AC. I n.R. t • 'a re _/J ■ ■ ■ [ -T A ■[ LLD :F ppv I_ 'our_.__1vz.__ ._�wr. _ucY•_c1..lu.w ' 1�xu 9ER d'CR89mQtT1AL AREA i e- 7-7 {.p� __„Ia__ _nlx'r": f•i ur"p- ____max•'.. TOTM.RE4DENINL MG AG .0 I ��40,�[a •.YYi 1� SO /�) - R, - oMI PROM..a TOTAL MLA v].][ "' .,..[ )``; a >t nl e • HOMLI LIAO m. ESIDETM.41•15 V _.1_.�_,..IA V -. fA •4./ =r.•nv, r] oVEION+l; - f nI ° a S'5, .,.y r..p.,. =,qg CROSS ossroo ML 00•117 I.DNna/AC.---E.__--IY it RGS ZIGA••SS. I AREA \� - ..it V. _ JIA HER•HWANO,TFlU6TEEB _ w.OF CC..AA..s a I" :v 1 - :'ter --- "---- 'g _ paN•Ar.a.M R IA; YMIIIW LOT 9ZC ,m]9J. ' 1`aA v. - .��-, \�, r - • \ ...I.111.TDie Oro•saw x Awl Los sac ]0,000 S7. II I n •'! + 1 - AND EONI11aJu1D I " 'r t•/ ! • `� •- BEUL AH CFI08B fsOR/woo c1.01.snot.ra �'i stur_. ____ ,. •r 1 [ VD.dm L. YLODM D061R.MIXED USE 1.. :. air,. �R .al V F01DQ.Ero.D USE IA ..' - )/ CONCEPT PLAN PROPOSED IOOp SRd_-_-- iJ - - •i/• A• Q/ � -� Ibl� ' I40lI.Pa u] KW,w7)mw LID 2• ..a.�} .j'� JT�^ • r\ . iw..v �- • D.SC.T 1r wAx..Y.r. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE IKD ! e71+'d 7 I.. L1oM1aN l r I r _ 4� ..".YONEDCII- j;;' AREA • AIrV., �a LT.: �w La D..IcIv FOXBOROUGH sTArr:dN.Ww Iuo7 Etp °'. ! EID .4. u • v' WM OEN CRUMBAKER DEVELOPMENT•INC wraE701' '. E7 I. UM III �. 9 7 { l ��I/ son Tiw.MO. AN ADDITION TO GENERAL NOTED 4002 c-) f I'• r.:v. � ,,,i�r 1 I r I ( ani v.\. n[w Iron• i wlnnr nor) 1..D1xIn Maur 1.mola..a 1 ..` ! mar_-/ -c_°_•W.°a"w'�__A.i_r_..._P�.e,P.•..._._( _ - "" TILE CITY O F COUNTY, TEXASAKE I'.".R..V. . . ter. Maw.9510.. - - - - _ -'- •- - - TARRANT COUNTY, V__ [, N. . .-- _ .N As, I/-;__-._.__,_ mA.wr./PI..•..: IN THE -•-- __ -- N.R. HALL SURVEY F,Y. 1 OR __ -_ • PLAN C `(90tl�'owAK pm) ll._-'p . �,a loiw•�a• ."_ - PLAN ABSTRACT MINmH.Itees.INc ADSTRACT NO. 667 Ex01xrW P 514110s LMTH i I --'------ --- .. LIARS +-j1-. 40.877 ACRES I , AEON LILY L moron Jr.A[R rAYLY I bLLT M xAro 1 1AKaER IAnE' 1 nit Soon.. I asa i w run ' I w.r ii•M"oa.,n \- D0I'll.[Iz IT. / .a.r P.nu I v iIX...P.1iul I v.if"1�[rsswap °i`p'DE 30 DECEMI)F.R 1996 ' I I A..won idtD M on T.M..n De Iwo n. oiT.ml. 101100.1..I,sin,"0'• REGD n n (���[�(� ... as n LLD[`oca a°e[ �rraxO VAI \ LIa ES�Le[ ( �1Eo I LI�` 7c zdro Aa I Y "EU 3 U IJa76 I IZ-A LW aM z-s E I V 1lLOQl I �( ( [W WA LHl 1 L414.23341. .,NO.ass-us CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-223 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE . OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A _ _ ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BEING APPROXIMATELY 23.7 ACRES .SITUATED IN THE W. W. HALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 695, BEING TRACT 3F, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-20A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC . REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; • PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR.A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. REQUESTED ZONING: • WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter .• adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter . 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211.of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance,and map regulating the location and use of• . buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend.said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and • WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and 4wWHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a erson or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called L:\CTYDOCS\O RD\CASES\480-223.20A Page 1 • 7A-30 by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a_determination.as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings; and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, • WHEREAS, the City Council of the.City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the •clearly rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, . WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and.facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City. Of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined.that there has been a change in the conditions of the property,surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land.were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. • NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City �f Southlake,' Texas, passed on the 19th day of. September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-223.20A Page 2 7A-31 Being approximately 23.7 acres situated in the W.W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695, being Tract 3F, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the.herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing • sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4.. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of •land; transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and .with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. . Section 6: That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed-to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates,disobeys, omits, neglects • or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. • Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; L:\CTYDOCS\O RD\CASES\480-223.20A Page 3 7A-32 ' and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by°Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after it§passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1996. MAYOR ATTEST: .. , s CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-223.20A Page 4 7A-33 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-223.20A 7A-34 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at the southeast corner ofl that certain tract conveyed, to Homei Liao and Jia Her Hwang, Trustees by deed recorded in Volume 7937, Page 294 D.R.T.C.T. and/the souith— west corner of said Cross tract, the common corner being in the north right—of—way of F.M: Highway 1709. I Thence with. b common line to said iao Sc Hwang tract and said Cross tract North 01 degree 10 minutes 56 -seconds East :775.03 feet" to a point on . the south line of Lake Wood Acres Addition — Phase II according to the plat recorded in Volume 388—:137, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas (P.R.11.C.T.) and the common northeast corner of-said Liao & Hwang tract and northwest corner 1of said Cross tract; - Thence with a line common to said Lake Wood Acres Addition and said Cross Tract South 89 degrees 10 minutes 04 seconds East 523.65 feet to an iron pin for the southeast corner ' of said Lake Wood Acres Addition and the northeast corner of said Cross Tract, and in the west line of SouthView — Phase 1 according to the plat recorded in Cobinet 'A',- Slide #784, P.R.T.C.T.; . Thence with a line common to said SouthView — Phase I and said Cross Troct, South 01 degree 47 minute 47 seconds West 343.29 feeti to an ,iron pin for Southwest corner of said SouthView Ph I and the Northwest corner of SouthView -- Phase 11 according to the plot recorded in , C< t 'A'. Slide #1350, P.R.T.C.T.; Thence with a line common to said SouthView Phase I! and said Cross Tract South 01 degree ' 30 minutes 19 seconds West .509.76 feet to an iron pin for the southwest corner of said SouthView Phase II and an ell corner :of said Cross tract; , Thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 17 seconds East 131.32 feet to the most easterly northeast .corner of said Cross tract .and the northwest corner of that 7.75 acre tract conveyed to Jimmy E. Perry by •deecli recorded in Volume 4343, Poge 260, D.R.T.C.T..; - Thence with a line common .to said CroLs and said Perry tract- South 00 degrees 59 minutes ' 02 seconds West, 874.40 feet to the southeast corner of said Cross tract on the north right—of—way I line of F.M. Highway No. 1709. - . Thence with. the north right—of—way Ncrth 89 •degrees-•59.- minutes 13 seconds West 656.20 feet to the "Point of Beginning and containing ;sane:--23.7'• acres of land. i • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-223.20A 7A-35 Page 6 • • -t r 0 ,.' t70 • _ O 0. n to • o 4 . z 0 a - Ir1 Crl A - CO O rRorufT DnOT[tM ` 44 111444311 wI I I I I •a°a 1 IT 1 "".....t"Opr.010. II' - - a @Ia met • I 1 1-1-----,. .. -c% -1 1 \••r aart.. I iKM C.*,• NI Pa rtan la.my Inat Of r a IPA yr.not n 1...'Coos by 10. Oar N • ♦" ♦ qq .w. 11.w.r.•aln, War 11...I rn.•Caon,1.(oA1.01)w I aWrcDa . O 14111 I Uri.am r11In Imm1-/nAz 1 I I dl 1r.4 f.,r....I...r a 110I0 M.w.n•r.. 3 R I I CCNCEFT•r \w-w-1o1,a>• 1 I (, rJ_TLC 70 1 fwQ•Iw4 M w low.•.wow r..wrW.are .1..•U... a I I I In .��... PLAN 11 »�+-1 / 41 ,I > .r"."rl..li..0�.~ w•..: w.�n�owra _r-�r f //// F__---- 1; LMTS r ler. ! I 1 ,Ir•'' Ebb nr,..r va. / -�L%=,= tOw D•l ...Ns. 'f/ /-,µ PLAN_ IMH.rn•mm�w na M W U.•1..1 RI M W G..tract MwG 01 / / t_� 1 Mµ I -,rt 1 2 t�9 ... 10 II 14r I. \•w •...1 ti w.•:1M),n�.1 """"•' j, - - / I - . -7, 1 _ .. .,.. pl r L 1 NI I , 9>JMA(rt-rn•x 1 ti..M Ta .t a.ro 1^(.x1L1.)w r�.....,1,..e..M..,..r Ire u. \ - i // - '� saw-. .J•._ rF. .Aw 'Y1aw '•�'-1}.y_•_____11IOi-u_!___ / •11NM wa1M f.r....•1•.f.........r i ♦ 1 •.I. 1 I-./ , I, ,•,rr4 TX 1...•MA•M a....1.WO tr..•r....a•ow M aw w 120 raw LOCATION YAP 1 L 11 1 1 t i 1. I n ♦ tra0.N•l rrrArtl, f , I I f01R YEN r 't UM°.•••••L..°\1a+...fofor..•••0 oaf ICe..••TM&end..•Fnm. ♦ '\°a 126-A4 rQ V I I' -- a ; b ! to 1 p n I Ito ,n t•11 yuMn-P.1•awranr r n rot`nrs.n c.w0•r.wl I1u• ♦ 1 iamv-`i' l.,LEI K .-vl 1 fa Fy al av1 v. -- ■ �Ltsa ixl.u.l \ LOU -,.....f.•.-Vq--.,•,•ti �- V• dual v. ' 8 s � I I L_ O..A•la r+w.Y w....-1.1..0w 1r.4.3M1.°f.I. ♦ to ca(�/'� ( •. -_ L_ .- ' ..i L t I I i:.i w:11.,,."".'�"'.1.w 1w y.r�m.,.,..1.....r..,..,..1.. ♦` .. ♦:/ I 7. . .. --, ..4 u -- .I.I 1P I I e.I.'r no ob.dn.r/ •........rot ma.. i , i� • { S E i- 1n..••••r.•tor..all 2.1.1I..1 M.M 0w wA 3.w 01 Mai.. L_`` I r- ,- MALTON il-- _ -,s--i 1 f i.4......... ----J I 2.001.P1.•1.r on am a I.w .�.aw w..n..l•.,.r.de r-�--7 I y® .1�, n.v 1112 uur •n. fi -r 0/ q\ nonett a.�.n rr,N.2 on.n ma.w fa.1]I31 IRA n..M w.r.A n.. ) I a)I, t,•1 _- __ _ ' I 13' _ 1 1// r.m.wt a.n.f as W C�M M w+w...ter.r.A 7.73 a•r.ova / i J a ; -- I III : / ., I • I •.-..a Ara*C.P.y••r ran..•a...W1.111 2 4°MAN ' / ., - .• , I • M • "r V,i .Y V. nJo V. ala\,L r . --••ate @ i.w.M•r..a I114 M Y nWi on. a.C.ad al0••�•1 oI~.w M.r Y.M-ar-.1 r, . • nA v. r.•v. woo lA 1 at II ••.2nm,I___l�,'SRi.4'r -- ..64Kla 1.0.•1.1700. JJ°.°U..� ` 11t 1 LL>r t 1rf 1 1 1r 1 r µ ri V • I Il fM U w aft•I M1••9 M..a.•.,..217 bent r Ira 1 I • ,1 Ian , ,i.l 1h1T y1 In 4 1..,..4 O- I I.1 • 1t/�•J ao ..,0. •.n.�•nsetr. \' Iat. I .xrcaD - x .. I \ 2araa =� --- .- I w.W.MALL S1diVEY,A 66/ I - '� -��. •i 1A L OWNBT LAN•er - 1"'] a I 1 tom.,. - J._- -1 • T :I' s I IWI na1 v. • `\ cDNIDII,'7JIfA(�e.W V.• If 1 11 I - a.ln v. �,>.:- Y._ r17 v. t I I n•I.c w-atut I•K1M rt1m.. __ ____ M;DATA tr : 1Jr•II.__ �1---' r f 1 I • 2 I I .r•1•.f m.%•MN,21.11 • n1 Y.-.n.IC 7 -1 ` , . ._-.L-- 2 _,r.T ar MAW 1t°dr 70121 _ •A,1.CC TX •1 I 1iA V.\• \ e' i... z•....,, ' I-12f x}rnll- ti.Tra-- ifalf.,,__.III.N--1 q 1 1f OS It 211.2.',N.A'n1,11, rnco Y-. dR-1 .Tr-• "� "� .....'.. - .. 1 / \ ••.24 __1-1/al' 7•1' C U.3It 1119e. law OM 1 • •..Y V "�'y I.V. 4, •.,-."...... 111 I o2.mow •- '20122 sr-Dos''y �LID ,�t V.; YIn V. )+a•i 1 U. nau IA ""I•n..a,,,,, r..r 0. -��i•'If 111,01121P ax 11�.t0 T OS Al ',tr._.,lvA 'I PA+_ '.MA_-1' ` 1 __ : .w 10•1f•a ., LAND BSE DATA '. /,,, 1".�_.+,.._.., 8 . •_ W. nu. nlxw.' � Y•A- _14_W n•°r»orq Ia. vr0. IDIOMS AIM-a0.077 17101E I N. ' 'n 1k r1,.r P,f•,r -'•_ '7„` '_Cfl0_SII IANR• •-^ _�-. a If+r d Thor 7172.MID t.m0 c,(A fl. .) IA.'c I{ ' 1 l II 1 t r�rr \\\'''jjj nan• nun nLm' MAY (.a1•((w(al-7CIfi.1IRN0 21.•01 WA) I.a K • 1" f 7 �\ W11 V.,� E j .*I_. _-__ __._._ �._ YU4rl,La. 1 S'A+(taw C••1• 1 t•••1 71.1 K II iM.n v. JI V. I 1 , a{ I^ __/1r� -1 R rr@I,,a N2 p . 211 AG L ..i i 1 Y • w it t a w Y, Id[D°QA9 ` N,r.U.0 YA.a I L r .\, Y 1..1� n.. V. W.1/.• n., U. 1•.0.•r LIo /\ NON-REfIDEN al.4321 _ 1 U11 . a ••-• `a Mai sr,r . J WO.OM rm o.Or TO .. tc.I \.N. ��' ...w .. r 1 9! 1 _ ._u.r�_ _�Vfc .-Al."- ',Pr,.\.I.rw._ �`� • a•r c1 0a A7�•rt* /. 'III. - nr»- .:rot. _ _lair �,,.. • Ra21D0m41 ARIA u • >4 1 1, �/II A - - HOMCI LIAO IN 2S00014 MG . K i• II• , % I n' 1 fl .0.O001 Cr 101K Mr °f111 •r 1 \ ,__ 2 I. / Ma IY0 V.r ra-U. t200..Mrs v .•i_._... a n u. .. riots; .. A/ A V.9 ..1....1 Q JIA HER 1-tWANt74 TRUE TL*EB yr.1 I.•Im• N0. 1Q w.V1u. t Coe G.Ott•(tr.%.Yl OOArtT ..l1 1••It/K.---1...•. Z 1 ARrA.-- .�l{{,)1�\a]`\J' �r' I1' -. .@.•ON _ - .hti.IA R'W MW nlA.•f; I- • 1 W V. ' \�I ' ` '11'•.• ••- ••y • - Gwal.ol,1a.\I..• i.N M r.I..T • beran.m.xC ropm u- :7-X,14. • ...,,.• ♦ \ -- --� ) BEULAH OROBB ZONING/UM I I •w r •(i�/ ••-GAMO ID-_.1-•---• f •I•Ia.Y . r•[ltnl 10b.. 01,UIOa PC I/{1.IC_- .-__ /: r .Irk II. . ��1 1a 0N•0,0 .,04(1(A. a.�•a. i•a 1• ii1S1. 1 "(°""'0iiianr..•co b I _. 1t..._+_••.t• u• '•.Cf - �_ ___-��- .- ,. POL 11034•a Na CONCEPT PLAN Y� 1. I , ' ' Je,, XX A.� E % roS°4 Drt•,•n FOXBOR0'LI Tx rpC� I'•• I r / I �yi !1 2 nrw V. nn1 V.f•• 1 110 DBlitOPYEM SCHEMA ,I 2oNRD Cl �, �fA d Fa•of n.n•r, 1t0.OM CRUMBAKER DEVELOPMENT.INC frM.wAr,In� I L10 ,•�1a AN ADDITION TO CWM1LTO.:M1.11> s • •qr@ (r1 r i .•w na.Pa •1 r. n. 1100INN• lr,r�•:-1 1, �,,,, F SOUTEILAKE GENERAL NOTES r0.0 C-r ."��_^'�ui •••�i t I I CO MON AREA, - •.. '� IE CITY 0 • ae. .\aDo.ra -------..jI t ._ ...._.`a1 • '1.1 �+v rwu._ _i_G____r_rrx-_I. �, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS .Nvon®.roa /` - , •craril___-_ .. t Dafb.•1./A...+c IN IS ...___�_.__ ...-1,• \I '';" CCt PT .A a uVITT RM. HALL SURVEY • I.-. ►_-- i MI, nmT llw.,_�. �NerNfQlf.11•IG CC f 'T.II. t os -j; 1l I..... .-_-__-_ w,I,IMure,4- • •--_-•• PLAN ABSTRACT NO. 097 RUN 75011�MN LYD.) .. IuNN■m t.MTB 2.a1NvxE r LLCM I . I . •--•- -.. l•-. 48.877 ACRES • ,IyfA1 r11p T II'14•0,1A•INIryw1 I R.T ,,,,,, 1 SUMP.MAT 1 °I'A111I°IINI1�4t rw n+ue111wrI .I. JU DF.CEMIl1:i1 1900 I .M1a I•IA I I rOL I 111,2l b ‘ t�fA7 1 �E rvi Ir•I!°1 i 1/11 YO)��yo,I,tg,,'A:1 I Y r0�.�1'�..n rr 1 Y.nu r.1m •LmWL r0.1 NwC rirwmo(11��•yy,,MI LIV Lyoa L1 YID II IO®'1 I 'p� ��' Inrl r.ln! • 'w1w,n ab,ft1 , ll, x 1J t , • , Dt , ' u'kCA1ba ; LW 'lAe :rp D E C 3 Q 1996 um NO.20.1.12 4 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT January 3, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-137 PROJECT: Preliminary PlatLFoxborough (Submitted as Fox Glen) STAFF CONTACT: Tom Elgin, Planner II, 481-5581, ext. 753 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Foxborough on property described as being approximately 48.9 acres,being Tracts 3E and 3F in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695. This plat proposes 63 residential lots (orginally submitted as 63, amended to 64, then changed back to 63), one commercial lot with "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial district zoning to remain, one lot zoned "0-1" Office District and designated as common area, and 3 additional common areas. LOCATION: North side of East Southlake Blvd.(F.M. 1709),approximately 1140' west of the intersection of East Southlake Blvd. and North Carroll Ave. •WNER: Beulah Cross c/o Ben Muir(Tract 3F) and Homei Liao and Jai Her Hwang,Trustees(portion of Tract 3E) APPLICANT: Crumbaker Development,Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG"Agricultural District,"SF-20A" Single Family Residential,"C- 1"Neighborhood Commercial District, and"0-1" Office District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) Mixed Use(may include office buildings,hotels,and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Residential Areas (Any Single Family District) NO. NOTICES SENT: Fifty-five (55) RESPONSES: Five (5) written responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Candace Harris, 920 Ownby.Lane,. Southlake, Texas, opposed. See attached letter dated October 6, 1996, addressing the impact 7B-1 City of Southlake,Texas - of the proposed development on other SPIN #10 neighborhoods, the "C-1" lot, and the builder of the subdivision. ® • Kenneth & Amelia Gardner, 550 Bentwood Lane, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "1. Density of homes adjoining the Lake Wood Acres addition (my subdivision) should be lower - i.e., larger lot sizes. Otherwise, my property value would be adversely affected. 2. Developer should provide street stub access via revised plat to the Lake Wood Acres addition ... for future development of the lots adjoining the lake." See attached letter. • Daniel & Barbara Clark, 1034 Diamond Blvd., Southlake, Texas, opposed. • David & Catherine Moberg, 503 San Juan Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "I do not feel that this change is necessary for the common good of the city of the Southlake nor its residents or property owners." See attached letter. • Larry Mahon, 470 Southview, Southlake, opposed. Resident states concerns regarding the developer, drainage, and street construction. See attached letter. Four (4) responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • Tom Miller, Diamond Ltd.4217 Breenbrier Dr., Dallas, Texas, in favor. • Dennis &Amy Archambrau, 810 Pearl Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Prefer much less drastic change in density." • Carolyn Johnston, 817 Pearl, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "I am opposed because I'd like the lots to be bigger in keeping with the same quality homes and lots in Diamond Circle." • Verne H. Rainey, 1020 Diamond Blvd, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Need to keep 1 acre lot so the property value in Diamond Circle and Mission Hills does not go down." A letter of opposition, received November 7, 1996, addressing the extension of Ownby Lane to service Foxborough, the Foxborough Development being based on an asphalt roadway, and drainage issues was signed by 27 residents of the South View Addition. Of these responses, twelve (12) were within the 200 notification area (marked with an asterisk * ). Note that one of these signatures had previously responded (C. Harris). Please see attached letter. P & Z ACTION: October 17, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table until the November 7, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. November 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. 7B-2 City of Southlake,Texas November 14, 1996; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the December 5, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. December 5, 1996; Approved (5-0) subject to Preliminary Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated November 27, 1996, deleting Item #5 (deflection in the common line between Lots 27 & 28, Block 1); amending Item #7 (regarding 35' setbacks on corner lots) as follows: Lot 8, Block 1 - provide 35' building line on Gateshead and 30' building line on Foxborough; Lot 13, Block 1 - 25' building line along Foxborough; Lot 13,Block 2 - 35' building line along Foxborough and 30' building line along Derby Court; Lot 14, Block 2 -30' building line along Foxborough; Lot 10, Block 3 - 30' building line along the east property line; Lots 15 & 16, Block 3 - 25' building line along Wickham Lane. COUNCIL ACTION: December 17, 1996; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the January 7, 1997 City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the items in Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 1996, Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated November 1, 1996, Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated November 27, 1996, and Plat Review Summary No. 4 dated December 13, 1996 with the exception of those items in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 5 dated January 3, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-137PP.W PD 7B-3 ! . • • Candace Harris 920 Ownby Lane Southlake Texas 76092 • Phone(817)329-3216 October 06, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission C'D OCT 0 8 1996 C/O Karen Gandy f1C 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Karen, Please consider this letter at the P&Z meeting scheduled for October 17,1996. Unfortunately I will be out of town, and not able to attend the meeting. Please allow this letter to serve as evidence of my opposition to ZA 96-137 and ZA 96-136. I have several concerns regarding the information that I was provided regarding the above-referenced cases. I feel it is premature for the Commission to consider these cases at this time. I think that, prior to submitting the above request to the Planning and Zoning Commission a presentation should be made to SPIN 10 for resident input. As you know SPIN 10 encompasses Lakewood, Southview,Diamond Circle and Mission Hills. The proposed development will have an impact on all of these neighborhoods. This meeting has not taken place and apparently no meeting is planned by the applicant. illThe second concern touches on the C-1 lot located at the southwest corner of the planned development. As drawn, this lot will be adjacent to three residential lots.The commercial lot should be down zoned to a residential use. • The third concern I have touches who will ultimately be building the subdivision.I feel this subdivision should be built by custom builders that are both familiar with, and have a history in this area. Additionally I may have concerns with the location of the large common area, the size of the lots and the anticipated drainage plans. I have discussed these cases with my neighbors and at this juncture we have a lot of questions with no one to answer them. We, as a community, would like an opportunity to learn more about the applicant's plans. Even if I was going to be in town,I do not.think a Commission meeting is the proper forum for this type of informational meeting. I need to have the above, and other questions, answered before I can support these cases. • For the above reasons, and others,I would ask that the Commission table this item until such time as these, and other issues, can be explored by the residents that will be affected by the proposed changes. . Thank you for your consideration of the above. 1 cerely, tiVA(06 ,n dace Harris S 7B-4 Ken Gardner s•.c. 50 Bent • - � .., .. , ,m•,=,,;g,.K�� 'kl�;b`M-,�.:. ,y. -.,2r:+.•_.,�tbs! tA»M1.tiyq:.,. .hRig .. ,. Southlake, Texas 76092 October 11, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: ZA 96-136 & ZA96-137 Gentlemen: ! will be unable to attend the public hearing on October 17,1996, concerning the Preliminary Plat for Fox Glen - reference numbers ZA96-136 & ZA96-137. My neighbors will help to represent my views:* In the current plan (Attached) I am OPPOSED.to the proposed plat for the following reasons: 1. Density of homes adjourning the Lake Wood Acres•addition (my subdivision) should be lower.- i.e., larger lot sizes. Otherwise, my property value would be adversely affected. 2. Developer should provide street stub access via revised plat to the Lake Wood Acres addition (my subdivision) for future:development of the lots adjourning the lake.: ri+. • During the October 17 public hearing,.my neighbors - Broadaway and Dille - will represent my position. Thanks for your considerations. Sincerely, Sincerely, 7-dx,m) andal v ae/lilA46U Kenneth ,N. Gardner Amelia L. Gardner Attachment . REcD OCT 151996 7B-5 : - November 5, 1996. . . • Planning and Zoning Commission do Karen Gandy City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake.,TX 76092 Dear Ms. Gandy: This letter is being generated in reference to the P&7 meeting scheduled for November 7, 1996: in particular two cases on the commission's agenda - ZA 96-137 and ZA 96-136. The following comments and observations reflect a large consensus of those residents currently residing in the SouthView development. As residents, parents and tax payers we are greatly concerned by the implementation of the proposed residential development put forth by David McMahan and Tom Mathews (Crumbaker Development). It is clear that the following issues will negatively impact the safety of our neighborhood and our residential property values. • The extension of Ownby Lane to service Foxborough: The Developer estimates to plot 67 home sites with an average lot size of> %2 acre. One access to this development will be off 1709 and one through SouthView via Ownby. Given that Diamond Circle Estates and the Timarron extension to 1709 will cause more (access) congestion on 1709, 411 common sense and the path of least resistance dictates that the new residents of Foxborough will use SouthView to gain access to either the 114 or 1709 via the Development's connection to Carroll. This will not only be a concern during the Monday to Friday Commuting period but weekends, as well, when the development takes shape on the Fast side of Carroll. This is further compounded by any proposed linkage of the East side Carroll development to Home Depot, Kroger, etc. The impact of this will cause major safety concerns for our children and for (SouthView) residents accessing the street(s)from their driveways. Most of us chose Southlake as the place to raise our children given the city's predisposition as a safe place'for learning and growing. Ignoring the issue of increased traffic flow flies in the face of this city's quality of life attraction. A number of solutions to this situation are possible: 1. By increasing the lot size (Foxborough) to 1 acre there will be a tremendous decrease in the • flow of traffic that(potentially)could be put through Southview. 2. Foxborough proposes another entry/exit point that will not negatively impact the SouthView development. At the SPIN meeting held Monday evening at the Solana Education Center, David McMahan made it clear that he was flexible to another potential entry/exit point. ♦. The Foxborough Development being based on an Asphalt roadway We are not aware of any recent upscale developments that have Asphalt as the basis for their road construction. As it stands right now the proposed Ownby extension will see Ownby go from Concrete in SouthView to Ashpalt in Foxborough. Clearly this will detract from our property values. • Continued .../2 RECD NOV 0 7 1996 7B-6 • ......2/ . • .. :cly'IegPoN?; 1.. .. #: In addition to the physical change from concrete to Asphalt will be the residue which will wil be deposited (tracked) on the concrete in the summer months when Asphalt becomes overly soft and tacky. There is only one solution to this problem and it requires the Developer to change from Asphalt to concrete if a linkage with SouthView exists. • Drainage Issues We are all aware through either personal experience, experience of friends or through various articles that one of the greatest issues facing Southlake is drainage. It was evident at the meeting /% that a serious drainage problem exists on the proposed development. Given that both SouthView and Diamond circle flow water onto this property any proposed development faces a difficult task in dealing with this situation. As potential neighboring residents we are asking the City for a thorough"Do Diligence"on the issue of drainage for this proposed development. For those of us who attended the Developers meeting we did not come away with a comfortable assurance that they know how to handle the situation. Both SouthView and Diamond Circle residents who sufiound this parcel of land do not wish to become the gate keepers to the Southlake version of Atlantis. Nor do we imagine that the city wish to take responsibility for authorizing the rezoning without the recommendations of an independent organization who specializes in such drainage related problems. In summary, there are enough issues pertaining to safety and potential impact on neighboring property values to delay the passing of the proposed rezoning by P&Z for ZA 96-137 and ZA 96- 136. We ask, as a unanimous body of neighboring residents, that this issue be re evaluated by the Developer and the City before it continues any further. 41) Sincerely, Th ents-of, iew • dy& lair • Ken& arah ' ord ' 400 uhview T ail • #7-L. Gp Loran&Nan Naugh Joe&Jeanne D'Amico 870 Ownby 405 Southview CiLtn.6),L, ToCIZA3Aef9Yae,4 e Aker . eggy Champlin 9 0 Ownby 400 ondren Court lc Candace Harri Paul&Linda Lamb 920 Ownby 415 Fondren Court • continued /3 7B-7 /3 • c 411 0 Jeff&Kar n Morris Ray&Ro ' Kingsbury 950 Ownby 405 Fondren Court /7' ent&Lisa Ramesbottom Don&Jackie T mpson 970 Ownby 1025 Own y Mark& tP Mattlage Jim&Rene C ord 1000 Ownby 1075 Ownby r - B &Molly Axline Michael&Patti 411 1050 Ownby 1125 Ownby /11/41J 041,1 . Richard&Becky t fG icto,.,�. H &Edie Sparks 350 Binkley Court .. 1175 Ownby • • 7B-8 Additional signatures received on letters identified to preceding letter: .ennis and Angela Brady Patty and George Howell 625 Southview Trail Tim and Erin Ratliff Joel & Debbie Bell 925 South Bend Trail 625 South Bend Trail *Jim and Becky Settles Greg D. Duesing 410 Southview Trail 670 Southview *Ted and Debra Harbour . Brooks West 450 Southview Trail 975 South Bend Trail *Richard and Marilyn R. Curtis (? signature illegible Lawrence - no address given) 520 Southview Trail *Leroy Sisco 420 Southview Trail *Larry Mahon 470 Southview Trail ',Dennis Murphey 415 Southview Trail *Paul Soulrer 525 South Bend Dr. Karen and Gary Crapson 575 Southview Trail Bob Green • 920 South Bend Trail Stephen R. Watts 915 Oasis Court Amy Harvey 1000 South Bend Trail Julie and Tim Sanford 41ihn Vanfor 5 Southview Trail *Denotes those within 200' notification area. 7B-9 414 October 17, 1996 City of Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, TX 76092 RE:ZA 96-136 I am a resident of the City of Southlake, having owned the property at 503 San Juan for the past eight years. My property is adjacent to the property for which a zoning change is being considered under the reference number noted above. I am opposed to the zoning change as requested for the following reasons: 1. I do not feel that this change is necessary for the common good of the City • of Southlake nor its residents or property owners. 2. The request for medium density zoning is not in keeping with surrounding • developments and would likelyhave a negative impact on adjacent low g p l density property owners. 3. The commercial/retail use planned for two non-residential lots in the proposed concept plan is absolutely unnecessary and is not in keeping with the surrounding residential areas. 4. The development as proposed would create additional traffic safety hazzards on a portion of I-ighway 1709 that is already experiencing morning and evening conjestion. 5. I am concerned about the environmental impact of the proposed development. There are numerous mature trees on this property which • would be significantly affected by the proposed development as well as drainage issues that need to be more fully addressed. 6. And finally, and I realize this is purely opinion, I think the development as proposed is rather unimaginative and quite mediocre in its proposed use of the land. It seems primarily designed to maximize the number of residential properties that cart be created and sold rather than to create a more distinctive and aesthetically pleasing use of the land for residential purposes which • REDO OCT 17 1996 7B-10 ,r, City of Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission October 17,1996 • Page 2 would be in keeping with the character of both the surrounding developments as well as the larger community of Southlake. I urge you to reject this proposed change in zoning. I would be happy to consider other alternatives for the development of this property. Sin rely, David & Ca erine Moberg 503 San Juan Southlake, TX 76092 cc Mayor Rick Stacy Southlake City Council Members O 7B-11 • • October 17,1996 City of Southlake - Planning & Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, TX 76092 RE:ZA 96-136 I am a resident of the City of Southlake, having owned the property at 503 San Juan for the past eight years. My property is adjacent to the property for which a zoning change is being considered under the reference number noted above. I am opposed to the zoning change as requested for the following reasons: 1. I do not feel that this change is necessary for the common good of the City of Southlake nor its residents or property owners. 2. The request for medium density zoning is not in keeping with surrounding developments and would likely have a negative impact on adjacent low 411 density property owners. 3. The commercial/retail use,planned for two non-residential lots in the proposed concept plan is absolutely unnecessary and is not in keeping with the surrounding residential areas. 4. The development as proposed would create additional traffic safety hazzards on a portion of h Ighway 1709 that is already experiencing morning and evening conjestion. • 5. I am concerned about the environmental impact of the proposed • development. There are numerous mature trees on this property which . would be significantly affected by the proposed development as well as drainage issues that need to be more fully addressed. 6. And finally, and I realize this is purely opinion, I think the development as proposed is rather unimaginative and quite mediocre in its proposed use of the land. It seems primarily designed to maximize the number of residential properties that can be created and sold rather than to create a more distinctive and aesthetically pleasing use of the land for residential purposes which • REC'D OCT 171996 - .. ._ 7B-12 ,.' • City of Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission October 17, 1996 • Page 2 would be in keeping with the character of both the surrounding developments as well as the larger community of Southlake. I urge you to reject this proposed change in zoning. I would be happy to consider other alternatives for the development of this property. Sin rely, David & Ca erine Moberg 503 San Juan Southlake, TX 76092 cc Mayor Rick Stacy Southlake City Council Members S St 2i • Z}: t i': 7B-13 ',.- a •asT 5.97 k I � _ ..Z�f' 1MA D. N. ; IUo2 l — ' 9.47 k ADQ�1• �'Jfi y.. . • 4024 �� 20RN90N — _ 3A101 • _ ;i 2i4ac k heA, UERE ifARY 11 CIA ='' _A�• 7E18 JEIA SEIC • ►+ �ia1 �Gr1'o! � if r r •- _, 9R 7�pD�! ! .'' •40 f al �— 4,f - 18.94 k F f'. is � �_ 1 ,EA 401 .�, gF I© ' EAST HCtILMO STNE£G 1a ' 1 _ /, 4 atoll c 14- ;;I E3 ate' IE 2: +✓ i lc GARRU ;li:i 1, 55r! 9 r A= iAG'� R !A .I 4 i i ' ! Mem rr MI i ridNR 'I 1II 4 i i 4IPT i ! l•:.a1` 4 i d . _ HALL ipN W.�i . HALL !: "' 1.1A, •• '- tpir70.4 ..r r.r.N.: A 4 i ! 4 i 4 J .4. A-481 4 i t • +, ,, • i . i i i r / 1 4 51 4 1 r ! 4�,I I tll f// j jj 4 I ; 1 elan J ` 28 2A 2 ;........ 11....erga• •i 3 261 k ,,,,_ ,.(: , ,..., (-- ,i �`' ��r05 ittaitAli i / / 1 r ! i a" -~� . II � inak.....„..-wla t 4 . 4l.1 '1 4 • - s. ri m� j i 2A' i ! I i i i i i i lill • . ).- r ' • . • , ,%,,.. .• 0 mil ..... .. . ... . x �!' ! •�� 1� et,„_ ims .00. ,log) 2A2 ler D5 c x g 3E SD 502 3A 303 x 40 7A !,Ls'EI a tseGAR$ i P Opp 10 k 9 kI!fr5*c r •. D! G xc k Ur, titIRON MA n. H �4• i iii R j DD(f r- �, a Illibmillm--- �2 A-.2An HI walk Mill21k= 1& #VOI1IlIMI k- ifiv. 1 i ., V': !n-, 28 m r f-2J1 pp/. LU1 r}� 5� t ''v+ �•r,41�t1u✓/:RJ.T:1'G'11.. ®I�L�®I•�Ill �1'1:.� r�IUVIUI�Y pk F�.'� f i ! { , �•. i : iii4f1i � ' PA—�JVl1�� sontr A-es� r.l .� ' i 4 { i ! m i Csz�� - E i i • .�r.A • O. i i ,'sd, •� - i i i i i r i :•.3 ji. IlYS 2.2 AC 2 , ! i i i 1 °'- .�t.- `.\ TRACT MAP •; b�M[ .: S EA1 7B-14 ! . T. , I AL MORIN . . . . AND ZONING i . • . • ._ . 04'-4----- —•_• • ••• 1s •,..• • -•• ---,, .• :. • • . i 1 1 , 0, • 9 55 . . . . ... J. . . 1 5 i•-• . .•..•••• ••••..... . I. . . . -m - 20 54. 8 2 4 .. •.... ›. • , .• .. .... ..... „.i.,...,,....;-:•::::•:.•..;•.. . a x 1-•. . = ...• .•53 , . . 6 .• a • V) i 9 I . 9 in t - . I 7 r 22• ne; . in 52 . . . , 51 , „ . . . . 3 lit,,,F1-6 ' • 0 • "'1 11 ' , • 50 '12 ...' ' .1.3' '‘. •7.....,.. c . .. _ . .. ,. . .. ...,4 a . . 49 • • 14 51.5 11 6 >/. (5... . Fi BF 001.41. T' -,. i 2 .05 AC. 1 22.0 AC 9 ,---:,r 48 . ., aci ,• 0 , . .. 0 47 .• 18 --,,,......................„ 2 lik. . 0 . . . . < . 1-4 . 0 46 . . .. 19 ...., • -7— 45 3A . •I, . - ....._ • • TR 3 A 3A 44 / . . • ...- .. 20 7.665 . I '\Ns . • I 2E1 - 1--— - 77. . 4., •:. • . ..--- • • we • .. SOUTHLAKE Bg 31 . ••••••••• T2R1i2. TR°.6=6 I• I.- TR•0 1335D 30A 1 :,....• TR 5D2A R 1 / / 4...... . \. . t, I - L: 054 AC 42 39 3. 34 02,„ so 29 . .- 27 .25 all *°17 .oc , • 5 D 2 2.;032.0 23 - • . • • -1•R2.D . • . . 33- • 410 . 41 . • 0 •.• 3.5 .•,-.1 .. . • .. 26 . • • • TR 381 , - .. ••• - . • 30 :28 • • , . • 1113 • : - . „. 7B-15 1........i• • - • .gie ..... , .. Adjacent Land Owners ZA96-136 and ZA96-137 fb # Owner Zoning # Owner Zoning 1 K. Gardner SF-lA 29 State of Texas AG 2 D. Dille SF-lA 30 W. Rucker AG 3 B. Mckee SF-lA 31 State of Texas AG 4 D. Anderson SF-lA 32 State of Texas AG 5 R. Lawrence SF-20A 33 Timarron AG 6 L. Mahon SF-20A 34 J. Baker AG 7 T. Harbour SF-20A 35 J. Baker SF-lA 8 L. Sisco SF-20A 36 State of Texas SF-1A 9 M. Massad SF-20A 37 'J. Baker SF-lA 10 J. Settles SF-20A 38 State of Texas PUD 11 D. Murphey SF-20A 39 State of Texas PUD 12 K. Clifford SF-20A 40 Timarron PUD 13 J. D'amico SF-20A 41 Timarron PUD i14 R. Blair SF-20A 42 State of Texas PUD 15 L.Naugher '.,SF-20A 43 State of Texas C3 16 D. Akers SF-20A 44 Diamond Ltd. C3 17 D. Harris SF-20A 45 S. Murphey SF-lA 18 Mendez Ltd. AG 46 J. Wood SF-lA 19 Mendez Ltd. AG 47 F. Decinti SF-lA • 20 * 48 W. Quinn SF-lA . 21 State of Texas AG 49 D. Clark SF-lA 22 State of Texas C3 - 50 R.Poucher SF-lA 23 Southlake C3 51 J. Ridenour SF-lA Partnership 24 . B. Cross AG 52 V.Phillips SF-lA 25 State of Texas AG 53 E. Silva SF-1A 0 26 W. Rucker AG 54 D. Moberg SF-lA 27 State of Texas AG 55 D. Wiviott SF-lA 28 B. Hayes AG * 7B-16 City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY •ase No: ZA 96-137 Review No: Five Date of Review: 1/03/97 Project Name: Preliminary Plat-Foxborough (formerly submitted as Fox Glen) 48.877 in the WW Hall Survey Abst.No. 687 - . APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Crumbaker Development J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. 100 W. Southlake Blvd. #320 726 Commerce Street. Suite 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone : (817) 329-6996 Phone : (817) 488-3313 Fax : (817) 329-6996 Fax : (817)488-3315 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/30/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. ......:...................•...k..+........:........:.:....x......Y.........:....:.:h n n :nn•.: n 1•�::••x::$::{•::.w:: ;..r...;...•:r:h•.::::vv•::::r n•::.::• nv:w.virv:Fr•::ii::::$::::::<irv:•:. 1.' Provide an additional interior lot line in Lot 2,Block 1 and in Lot 1, Block 2 (common areas) along the existing 0-1 zoning line for tracking purposes. As currently configured,this will result in a split lot zoning. S The deflection in the common line between Lots 27& 28, Block 1 and between Lot 6 and 7,Block 3 does not appear to meet the intent of the perpendicular/radial side lot line requirements. (P & Z Action 12/05/96:Amend to allow as shown)Please note that Lots 6&.7, Block 3 were not addressed in the previous plan review or the P& Z motion. 3. The zoning ordinance requires 35'building setback line adjacent to all streets on the lots listed below. The applicant has requested reductions along the"side street" corner lots as follows: a. Lot 8, Block 1 -25'BL along east line (P&ZAction 12/05/96:Allow) b. Lot 13, Block 1 -25'BL along the north line (P&ZAction 12/05/96:Allow) c. Lot 13, Block,2 - 30'BL along the south line (P&ZAction 12/05/96:Allow) d. Lot 14, Block 2- 30'BL along the west line (P&ZAction 12/05/96:Allow) e. Lot 1, Block 3 -25'BL along the west line f. Lot 15, Block 3 - 25' BL along the west line (P&ZAction 12/05/96:Allow) g. Lot 16, Block 3 - 25' BL along the west line (P&ZAction 12/05/96:Allow) 4. Provide a name for the cul-de-sac south of the intersection of Foxborough and Wickham Lane. 5. Provide easements for water, sewer and/or drainage in conformance with plans as approved by the City Public Works Dept. Unless approved,do not center interior easements for water, sanitary sewer, or drainage on common lot lines. (Offset so that improvements are in one lot or the other.) 0 If any, show the 100 year floodplain and floodway. Designate any floodway as drainage easement. 7B-17 City of Southlake,Texas * Note that in the Land Use Data summary, Lot 2,Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 zoned 0-1 "Office" are shown as common areas;however, the residential density calculation does not include these lots. Two intervisible boundar y corners of the site must be geo-referenced by state plane coordinates in accordance with section 8.03(B)of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 upon submittal of the final plat, and,prior to acceptance of the subdivision by the City, a digital computer file of the subdivision must be provided in accordance with Section 8.04 of Ordinance No. 483. • The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 1/13/97. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. P& Z ACTION: October 17, 1996;Approved(5-0) applicant's request to table until the November 7, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. November, 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 14, 1996;Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the December 5, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to continue the public hearing. December 5, 1996;Approved (5-0) subject to Preliminary Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated November 27, 1996, deleting Item#5 (deflection in the common line between Lots 27& 28, Block 1); amending Item #7 (regarding 35'setbacks on corner lots) as follows: Lot 8,, Block I -provide 35'building line on Gateshead and 30'building line on Foxborough; Lot 13, Block 1 - 25'building line along Foxborough; Lot 13, Block 2 - 35' building line along Foxborough and 30' building line along Derby Court;Lot 14, Block 2 - 30'building line along Foxborough; Lot 10, Block 3 - 30' building line along the east property line;Lots 15 & 16, Block 3 - 25'building line along Wickham Lane. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. Crumbaker Development, Inc. Homei Liao &Jia Her Hwang Beulah Cross L:\W P-FILES\REV\96\96-137PP.5 • 7B-18 F . • • 411110' 1 • • 1� Y: I 1 ;I PAD GY 1Ef nrsL•SDrnor I I I I i : T� I QaQ I t....om.no.mm. IF - 3IIS.cafe.De.,4 r r Iw rcaaa F t.1.1..1 S 042?.tESt a,. III I-____;' •.1 .L_., 1 G I ...am":.In.'n w I m..Tana cm•b. q Dan.r a um a..m tact F Ns as.r Wool Ym . .YAm a eof rOs Par Nor.T Ito...rLi tt 6U)�W.m''lam Vc•SD.6.3 1.010a M I°5,,,,,, aN I I/I I ,, we.mo MAP.ma,b.-PROSE• I I bl .O.q a..a r..../F va..ma,r.5....OArcr.(an r)w....a. ¢ IE .r.0 r•••..-C� WL]Pbt]a.rG i. 1 . peak**...6r b:da w eu.Y 1.m.Ira m brat C JI-r.W tic 1 ► / I I 1*5 r Ss.e�w.l acre a Id,Nov.In S DIP]a 0•mmee m'.[ma...m / �:�-_'� _ ,•or• { 1 I °Co..ry.a.�(5AuT.)and Dv Soak..wm. f77.Pops 5dd u1*• ..ra Rol Rsores.r•'�"t i // / ---1 :"'_; 1 ,1210132 6 or ...A / . I` .6e.ammo IM b ol.m.ra CO.ufrn w ra um• rq Irmt,No. . ` .. ,�. a 7205D L I ..1....a meow CO.ra.s PM P.WI•mmn.e acre a d1"�e DYmm0a ta.l. ....ter. / �_! n.ur I[ _ y_---v�. frM.w YIJ.n 10 Edo..c.®,I m m. noon.F w.mm]m-Ix.V.... a. -� ,•� b n: l _ _�J:c rn., _ __T __ ___�A„__w��Yd___.__u�__ ____Mil ate , •' _l \ < ,"'1w e rI c°xU.s°.•.sot�.r h w'`r e�..r t.'rw•,da....no zr' 0r.in 61 1,16.1.51 m.,i:.i i tm�:.ea a:Mum°wi.sl'o -I \ !•.' 1• I L I I I I I I I a I -I zPam T e«a w n.ears..m„e a w.1ee.au.aemwl-PAs t.,em.my m a ll''"" - LOCATION MAP \ VOL]0.-Iota.Pau tr PELT..-i .va v! ri 6 m ✓� a.r V. aAam V. \\ ECM 17 sr-t `' _e r•rc u Wm v. v. am V. asan ---- Im®t n:..r r..aY uDe•.r.. ..a w w..u..l Der..a.Y ..v ac \\ Lop�. .. 1-....-U.C......__ -�_.._.I.....__ M _ F.m. 15.w.M.6•..mmm\W Leta.m1 tp. w 110.w ra W t7 4 � I LLD a.c.u� r.nw w.macs ur u.r fr m.,..rr M t..�a L' I Cr.Tract t L 11.1m..M••.carom n r NY I*1.1 a..awc.1 w W Co.1.c1..0 � i '---' -sue _ _. 38 r 1 tl 10 Jew O..1.8.1.71 SS+..rr r n F.pr 1.*.•8=o r.e \` o r \•J' i r - ._ -u.'� `nw v. �+, o I dar •...naar.1..r W ae.rr.a,w r a. __ ✓ I: " _ 1 ('- M r z.0..-rnm.I.mea r.fern rmw n wemr a•.am PK l r- -g{ .T 1 • I tlr..a a.ti one.r w S.M..-Res I w W an Tract s.0 5f i T _ , aa®V.:. ".. Ira- 1.- ,1 \ 0,en.•n um.1.1 aaal M r n I. .M•a Sas...t so.r W s.0 ` .e.. f I v __ '{_ __ _ \ i , I /C a.Wir'A'.4Y./1Ja0.rATG1.LAnMw T�1 nmraa b mr pr r.e.aa F / /' r•5 - f / ".. 1 a tD �_-c..,v.._I ' I nr.m..u......r.rr..r R.s.uM••n..m e w W a...Tn.Saab°t s1. , I t a G , ^IA V. I SD.1..A..1•..0.r1.1•N 55or.10116 n.n On.Om..ew.n...e r w lum V. aa1.V.-1.ta V.• f.,r V. item V. .[ _ f __ • 50.61.•R.••w n r wow r W Ova trot ` n 1 I o-G m+r ',wLVr� 11 J 7 ,• otos 11a.r /DO 111M •nee • X.V. 1 I 1 Derry.In Aaq L Ps,N•..1 emtlJ F V..DUX P.Zea aN.T.Cr: • • I; Dy 1.av _ na 'L. ® ! I ,1rnw.a,.I.Demos r W os w W Pm Out saw m a.1..•a Derr. (1 •'. ' 1 I 6 ,.•.. '3--_ I�^'I SOIfr.tW-MA¢. M..A�rM 10.••earn 0•enrW Os a.al Do rvm AMbr-el a V 1 1 NJ"V. t ') I I CAS.9,,ant zlasa 1m...u.P.m.e..g9sr_..p R..a 50 e.........e.,.r.Se1C O moo V. ' S( 1 •I nY.V.•Aa.V.•a•af V. . ' �'V y {r s I rays{ PRt.rd U. !r r ere SM.r am el W Gs rr.a.r,M DoMa.f mm./a W fb t 1• ... JlI'. - I.3 I70.0 5.-4W Wr A T..f1 y1.r-{ i______J : L-' __ MSSMSS I iMn rM F.Mr.4Yti1-M MIAaO ..51 mW.03 wmm.1.1 laiuW -_r______-, r I tear `.� „IPe4 I ISm tEl rr b x.rl..r I•w•ty W mrre.l.Derr..n1 e.a d,..1• 1-• W.HALL SI.RYEY.A-007 . :, v --'� "ai 1000\\\k c,," , '�• DlrtrDY LANE --- I ct 1 � V. - _----- I 1,.( 1 sm°v. __'C._n.. C__ 0o,isE. A v. ,t tz I tl I , 0.0113 C1C6 i.41 8 _ e --n,�a___ ':1 -_a""�j'..;a'-"" NIL.,es-,n,rav ,.: '____ ..raa -'xaa_- isv - t I • i , TOED kg- e 1 \ 4 47• p.�e1.....,, - ln3F vi-maY- -.,T:F--' �E0* ,--IOWUP ` lair LOOMS ° 8' n \M.V. ..rev.9.4$ ........"...., A •r I • 1 • A• 4 • n CURVE DATA , ...... ,Z0N60 aP-ZOE''., • ...O .V.0. . .Aw V. a1 Z II..V.• na v.y. 0unr.. M. N0r5 7ARaaO,8Nc51 _ LUD �6 n.1m V. ` 4 I _- V•rt I .p.J'•Ir m.55.1x5.n•23111• •-a_ -------t=I,._0/_4.= MI/WM).',Mt_ ,� I L. __ -a.` _-__ z a M•.YI405•I mar jV.ea' LAND USE DATA =il.y- '8 , n,M i1.a•W • SURVEY.A-893 .5 .r..•.r51•.n•1..m•»1.rr Ca0a6 1116A.•e.aTT 1(016a " _ 7rY rr_.. i 1 - Il,fe • • .r+5•.r 1.55e•'irk.xaiw• .m,",..... war ---•-%7 a-CROSS LANE----_-- 5 •r zr.e Md.naar place M C (TO RD..) 1.6 AC. 1 I Y•L 11 I 6 .!I I I 4 • -? . .0 u.1Y,rA.e•,TSir 11•.1. l0 lte 01 1 1 § 1 ..ni ,I N' I Ina•' 117.1 r.ly trryry a,w._54ssw.rto.xr,1oR MLA) ,..as • t ' + 1c.a¢IT. w3 a eY Moss 022 .a•a 5•]°.(�mtnm5t•qq ItM ta.�t� ).C. 'n• V n; . non v. 1 -y.r___.-.____.___ yq, 7051.Pa•ea f.• Y.1�v •I. .a..r seas(Plrsmm crt°ss nrefl ]St re _ .t I .w• 01 .3 n In v.`11 Ia 'I Pll.rc°.a a1 ar as roll•t•aze•arm• n� is.•`- N ¢ 1,Yv.a nem V.ff I.a V. pi igrt0)S ..Ar OS Moo 600r 1.2.18' �` ,5w.IArlS .m w a r ;� /p!; ,� ��rol ,. .r.r.r Moo n.» 15•.,o- NON-RESIDENTIAL ARE/ - '1.>r o j_ _ __�:: _r _ __ �1� TOM iu NON-145mrr9.1 AWL.(CI) 1.•.C. t • `. r' r. _" _ ,may,_`.•n•�.�:__J]C -I_11,.11•�.e iyaraa• RrAran it 0•,Oaf M'' J.]a • -_ ' i{• O ,11]3 •i.x O% naar! /51 �-eCAT639•'`., (;:; Qb' --Nm-_ _ __Igrc \�..-a •-s / 0.v1f: RESIDENTIAL AREA ,0 ' y ° 1 a L ARCA w MA ,, ® i ID ''I•t. ,o a �'-r - HOM�1 LIAO • AO.1ta0tNIW nrna V .._i".._-,.• • u!.V.,' ".. I OYYOMSi!it) r a 0 ta.%'V.1 6 t •5a•1 La '1' a..0 v. 6 GROSS RIESCE.nt cram 1.]1 VICE/AG-- .• ._'' , AREA •.„A•"'I'1`Vu V. f0..1e v. '%, JIA HER HWANG!.TRUE TEES p•pna sw, r' rw'''' LOT .rwrr sa••>1 r a.0 ae. ,\(��/.am/ h!1 __ya.�-____._rcu._._ -__ - mg u.:1tn Dew nom 9 o..+e sc..ran ,S nM '"`^"".', n.m v '. �i'1. �m ntae Mao o BEULAH CRO813 ZONINO/LUD ....__ ......i �`1+---cAT AD-- i•-•--r Person zar•c CI.01,sna1,a5 l,.ec-_•___-- _ ? ,._,_._.' _ a 90/0 ow MN l00 ..Dew OrMm.wm USE "•:: ._.._..•+a xY ••• ••• . v.F ao,PAS PM LOMA use ,9 taw p. '` •/t - �___'-__ _ a,a. da lrmacz.Pro. . PROPOSED MOO 5rzu-_---r/ ._• '� r / ��� --'••- n�r.1w nw PRELIMINARY PLAT yy IY 4; g& a.m AL DEVIUAPIBNT saintly? R, •' ! i, f t`` C011A ° • 9 ale P.i 1ve v._ ta.o v._. nafe v. LLD COSH °mom F 0 XB 0 R 0 U G H '.Y """� c1"" s;s � 1 AREA i 11 a v, a t CRLIMBAKER DEVELOPMENT. INC mw'moR:Jn4Y,t1�Gp ` % lJD 1 I In,,-- i r. n"v.awrva pn AN ADDITION TO InL GENERAL NOTES za.aa o-x rr I .a� I Cor•ON near I ... - 9 m11m Ai ,' m.er amn..x,wi rm. ,• �. 1 �,y fA 1.1A IM,1• --- - -`'• I 1 ((� )i Yat ARG ` ny-aat.er THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ,e. r 1, I +I ,. Iawu----f_F____r_aT_9=:--1__------_. `\, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS S.Ms staN... QSwr.1 MONA ______ - ' •/srnir�------- I p-6}'a ii'lb_'+- - 6ym«0M.•3a..: IN THE . Y.' j0 anlsm 1-1-.5 MS k 'r' \ `r.a L. vrrr 11.1f. BALL SURVEY Na SPECK ROW 10 5 acts P.o.n -(ROU1p71110 BLODS - ;. -_ _ _._-... .-•1n11•rcu+o .__ L�NmIN�.INC .a1_n,ve I _ SRa,R6T11��7 PLUMPS ABSTRACT N0. 807 i ,rp..2 44414 1ua a rAry I .OAC1(AYIY I II if Won.. C.O.a i.. 46.877 ACRES Rosy r a a• °11r t rlarcr =1D PA^"�P$1 v°,eiai,Iw n tro.ramRt•a.a una.swP . a 30 DECEHBER 1998 I x•t I ,a.1•rg5,.. \ v...z..7A3 I,.imu 1 1 I r.1za1.P,ua, I r.i»..r.few '3f#iI0.[U Pu R.V I D1.1.5011 DA 1.M_tR d,m�7eA1' 0.e.im.,a. 0 a.W.n. f41(n».10-003 •wa1 n LLD MEP oDa1 A.,cDD2 \ 1axro Aa I drat Ara I raga Del I xoMro A3 I z1d•UU}}�� •• f 12-A L ° Opt I-01 LIOI•a1 De, 1L tA�.DQt1 1 1.40100.1201. LAID NSmiff C^� 40 �� -.... ;-0%Cr IDI 15111 If1 Jl City of Southlak ,Texas 1111 STAFF REPORT January 3, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-145 PROJECT: .Second Reading / Ordinance 480-224 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Southlake Town Center STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan on property described as being approximately 109.330 acres situated in the Richard Ends Survey,Abstract No. 481, being Tracts 2A and 3A and a portion of Tract 3. LOCATION: The property is bordered by the following thoroughfares: State Highway 114 on the north; Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) on the south; and North Carroll Avenue on the west. OWNERS: FECHTEL GROUP (partnership) with general partners: Alicia Marie Fechtel, Charles Fechtel, Mary Louise Logan, John Randolph Fechtel, Marguerite Elizabeth Fechtel, and James Milton Fechtel (Tract 3); and • Lorrie W. Beck,Leslie W. Klingman,and Carol Jean Peterka(Tracts 2A& 3A). APPLICANT: Rialto'Development, L.P. CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District REQUESTED ZONING: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development to include "C-3" General Commercial District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use(may include office buildings,hotels,and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Village Center NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty-four (24) RESPONSES: Four (4) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • N.M. Smock, Smock Husseini J. V., 1529 Leimert Blvd., Oakland, CA 94602, in favor. "... Will provide for needed City Hall, Retail • areas and green belt to support a growing residential area." • Smock& Husseini JV, 4222 Hallmark Drive, Dallas, TX 75229, in favor. "It should improve the values of properties in all adjacent areas." 7C-1 • Juergen Strunck, 200 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, opposed. "1. The alignment of Carroll Avenue at FM 1709 is not addressed anywhere . . . 2. From the Concept Plan map of the Town Center I have to assume that the interior street parallel and immediately North of FM 1709 dead-ends straight into our driveway. Ours seems to be the only residential property targeted this way. . . 3. The Commission and the City Council worked many months to establish provisions in the Corridor Overlay Zone Ordinance and gave many considerations to the Village Center . . . I think that it would be wrong to discard all those considerations straight out. 4. Movable vendor sales structures and kiosks sales as requested . . .are objectionable for many reasons." • Steve Yetts, Timarron Land Corporation, P.O. Box 290, Dallas, TX 75221-0290, in favor. P&Z ACTION: November 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 14, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 21, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 21, 1996; Approved (7-0) to close the Public Hearing and to • table until the December 5, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. December 5, 1996; Approved (3-2) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 1, 1996. Please see Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated December 13, 1996 for P & Z recommendations. COUNCIL ACTION: December 17, 1996; Approved(7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated December 13, 1996, and per City Council discussion. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the items in Staff Review Summary No. 1 dated November 1, 1996, and Staff Review No. 2 dated December 13, 1996, with the exception of those items in the attached Staff Review Summary No. 3 dated January 3, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-145ZC.W PD I • 7C-a O Rialto December 9, 1996 Mr. Greg Last Director of Community Development Department of Community&Development 667 N. Carroll Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Concept Plan for NRPUD - Southlake Town Center, 109.330 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481 Dear Greg: Further to our submission to the City of Southlake on October 14, 1996, and subsequent Planning and Zoning approval achieved on December 5, 1996, Rialto Development,L.P. is pleased to submit to Southlake City Council its application for a Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for Southlake Town Center. This application has been revised from the November 21, 1996 draft approved, as amended, by Planning and Zoning ("P & Z") on December 5, 1996. The attached • revisions were incorporated in order to take into account many of the comments and suggestions made in connection with that approval. To assist your review, a red-lined copy will be forwarded December 10, 1996, for your reference. Outlined below is a summary of changes made as well as a summary of changes recommended in P &Z's motion for approval which have not been made: Summary of Changes Made 1. Bandshell Park. As originally submitted, the "bandshell park"block was designated for future C3 uses. While the block was initially planned to be built out as common open space, it may well be that over time circumstances(including the widening of F.M. 1709 to 7 lanes) will dictate that the bandshell will be better served by being moved elsewhere on the site. In addition, it is our opinion that sound planning principles support a building or buildings on this block at some future point in time(the nature and extent of such building(s), if any, in part determined by whether the City Hall facility is located on the block north of the Town Square, as currently proposed), to enclose the town square oil all four sides. Planning & Zoning requested as a condition to approval that the block be restricted as common open space, and that we bring up the issue of the relocation of the bandshell as and when appropriate in the future. We have incorporated this recommendation in the revised Concept Plan submitted herewith, thereby increasing the total amount of common open space from 9.25 acres to approximately 10.22 acres. (Concept Plan) S 2. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses have been revised to exclude filling stations and frozen food lockers. Further,uses allowed by Specific Use Permit("S.U.P.")only include electrical and gas repair and installation services; lodges, sororities and fraternities; medical care facilities 7C-3 1 Mr. Greg Last ® Page 2 December 9, 1996 requiring or allowing an overnight stay; mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers; and plumbing and heating repair and installation services. (Appendix X, Section 1.0) 3. Maximum Height of Parking Structures. The maximum height of parking structures is changed from fifty-two (52) feet as originally proposed to forty-two (42) feet above ground level; provided that such structures shall be permitted to a height not to exceed fifty(50) feet by S.U.P. An additional provision allowing total building height to forty-five (45) feet (subject to three (3) feet being below grade) was agreed Thursday night. However, on further examination, we have deleted this provision as we feel it would limit below-grade structured parking to no more than three(3) feet,which we do not believe was the intent of the provision. (Appendix X, Sections 3.0a(2), 9.0a and 10.0a(3)) 4. F.M. 1709/Carroll Ave. Setbacks. Minimum setbacks along F.M. 1709 and the east right- of-way of North Carroll Avenue are increased from twenty (20) feet to fifty (50) feet as required under the Corridor Overlay Study;provided, a lesser setback to not less than twenty (20) feet may be approved in connection with site plan approval. We wish to emphasize, however,that the fifty(50) foot minimum setbacks from F.M. 1709 and the east right-of-way • of North Carroll avenue required by §43.9.c.2.(a) are not supportive in any way of the Town Center characterand design as submitted,which, simply put,was to bring the buildings to the street(s) internally, as well as to F.M. 1709 and North Carroll Avenue. The fifty(50) foot minimum setback will locate the street facades of buildings at a distance from F.M. 1709 and North Carroll Avenue that will weaken the perception of a well defined streetscape, and will establish the project as an isolated"strip" development,rather than a Town Center. It is our opinion that reinforcing a genuine sense of arrival to the new downtown on these two streets is a key to its success. The fifty (50) foot setback also greatly inhibits our ability to configure the required amount of parking,which in turn is necessary to convert the commercial uses that are needed. We would add that our plan has always been to establish the Town Center in an arrangement that for the most part screens such parking from the surrounding right-of-ways. (Appendix X, Section 3.0b(1)) 5. Maximum Lot Coverage. Lot coverage in the aggregate for the PUD as a whole has been reduced from not more than sixty percent(60%) to not more than fifty-five percent(55%), as recommended by P &Z. 6. Common Open Space. A new subsection is added clarifying that no building shall be allowed on any land designated as "Common Open Space"on the Concept Plan without the prior approval of City Council, with the exception of the bandshell pavilion on the block 1111 bounded by F.M. 1709 to the south, Street"5"to the north, Street 7C"to the east and Street "D"to the west. (Appendix X, Section 3.0e) Council.wpd December 9,1996 7C-4 Mr. Greg Last • Page 3 December 9, 1996 7. Location of Above Grade Structured Parking. The exemption for parking structures from the restriction disallowing the placement of accessory structures between the front lot line and the principal building on a lot is deleted. (Appendix X, Section 9.0) 8. Landscaping. The provisions regarding landscaping have been revised to clarify that while the requirements for a"downtown" as contemplated by the P.U.D. are different and in many cases inconsistent with the regulations contained in existing ordinances, specific rules and regulations shall be determined in connection with site plan approval. (Appendix X, Section 12.0) 9. Special Events Permits. A provision has been added that the process and procedures for the issuance of "Special Events Permits shall be determined in connection with site plan approval. (Appendix X, Section 13.0a) Summary of Changes Not Made • A. East PUD Boundary Buffer. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a five (5) foot buffer is required between C3 zoned properties. The PUD ordinance as drafted contains a requirement as to all PUD boundaries other than SH 114,F.M. 1709 and Carroll Ave. that a minimum fifteen (15)foot building setback be,maintained. P &Z recommended that a twenty-five(25) foot buffer be requried. It is important to note that the property immediately adjacent to the east is a twenty-five(25) foot wide strip of land owned by Diamond Shamrock, under which a gas line has been run. No buildings are on this property, and it is unlikely that the size of the land will allow any buildings to be placed there. The next property to the east is the Home Depot tract. Home Depot has allowed for a fifteen (15) foot setback to the Diamond Shamrock property. Accordingly, per P & Z's recommendation, a fifty-five (55) foot separation will now exist. We do not agree with the need for the additional ten (10) foot setback at this boundary and would respectfully request that Council review our application as originally submitted. B. Off-Street Parking. The PUD ordinance as drafted provides an allowance that up to thirty- five percent(35%) of required parking may be compact spaces(minimum 8 feet by 16 feet); provided that compact spaces be limited to off-street parking locations. A reduction in this allowance to twenty-five percent(25%)was made in P &Z's recommendation to approve. We believe the 35% standard originally submitted is reasonable based upon our traffic engineer's recommendation,national standards currently in place,Texan standards currently in place and local(Solana) standards currently in place. We would respectfully request that • the Council review our application as originally submitted. Council.wpd December 9,1996 1 7C-5 Mr. Greg Last • Page 4 December 9, 1996 C. Street 4/Mr. Juergen Strunck's Driveway. In the event North Carroll Avenue is realigned as currently proposed by the City, Mr. Strunck's property will be left without access to the new North Carroll Avenue. At the December 5 meeting,P &Z assured Mr. Strunck that the City will restore that access. However,restoration in a"straight"manner(i.e., due east)will leave Mr. Strunck's driveway in a location directly opposite our proposed Street"4". Mr. Strunck expressed concern that this may make exiting his driveway going north on Carroll Avenue somewhat problematic. We understand this concern,and agreed that we will provide an easement across that portion of our property left over on the west side of North Carroll Avenue,to the extent reasonably necessary to connect Mr. Strunck's drive from its current terminus to a location just south of Street "4", so that left turns can be made from his driveway without interference from the traffic exiting Street"4"and turning right (left turns from Street "4" are proposed to be prohibited). P & Z further recommended that the alignment of Street"4"be left open until the time of site plan approval. The City's proposed location for the realignment of North Carroll Avenue north of F.M. 1709 (instead of south of F.M. 1709, as indicated in the Thoroughfare Plan)presents issues and challenges for both Mr. Strunck and for the Southlake Town Center block pattern design. We believe the Scompromise offered is a reasonable solution for both parties and would respectfully request that the Council review our application as originally submitted. * * * * * * * In addition to the above, miscellaneous "wordsmithing" changes have been made to insure consistency throughout the document. We look forward to meeting with City Council on Tuesday night,December 17, 1996. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding any of the above, please don't hesitate to give us a call. Very truly yours, RIALTO DEVELOPMENT, L.P. Brian R. Stebbins President BRS/plt • Council.wpd December 9,1996 7C-6 RECa 00 91996 DRAFT- FOR DISCUIIIO N PURPOSES ONLY • Standard Modification Rationale (Current)) P.U.D.P. Permitted Uses C-3 General Commercial(§22.5.g of the Comprehensive Adds retail sale of previously owned retail goods by S.U.P.only; examples of retailers of previously owned retail Zoning Ordinance) deletes filling stations and frozen meat lockers;requires S.U.P.for goods include women's and childrens'resale electrical and gas repair installation services;lodges,sororities and shops used sporting goods(compare"Play It fraternities;medical care facilities requiring or allowing an overnight Again Sports"),etc. stay;mortuaries,funeral homes and undertakers;and plumbing and heating repair and installation services(P.U.D.§1.0) Accessory Uses per C-3 zoning and Section 34 of the Zoning Ordinance. permits outdoor dining and seating areas;street furniture,urban consistent with a traditional downtown uses (Zoning§22.3) design fixtures and streetscape components(P.U.D.§2.0) Building Height(General) three(3)stories and thirty-five(35)feet,not to exceed a • generally,three(3)stories or fifty-two(52)feet(P.U.D.§3.0.a) allows for a traditional building with maximum elevation of 710 feet(Zoning§§22.5.a,33.5 and in the event a building for a City Hall facility is located on the approximately 15 feet for the first story to §43.9.c.1(g)i.) block north of the Town Square block,such building may be accommodate retail uses and approximately 12 four(4)stories or sixty-five(65)feet(P.U.D.§3.0.a.1) feet for each additional story,with additional • no maximum number of stories as to parking garages;subject to height to accommodate a pitched roof with a maximum height of forty-two(42)feet above ground level measurements as defined;as to parking structures, (forty-five(45)feet in total);provided that such structures shall the number of stories will be dependent upon be allowed to a height of fifty(50)feet by S.U.P. (P.U.D.§ market demand and requirements based on total 3.0.a.2) developed area • all buildings subject to maximum elevation of 710 feet(P.U.D. §3.0.a) • adds reference datum for measuring the height of stepped or terraced buildings and for certain buildings where grade is a factor(P.U.D.§3.0.a) 9 i • • • • • • ii' ):a • DRAFT- FOR DISCUON PURPOSES ONLY 4110 Standard(Current) P.U.D.Modification Rationale Exceptions to Height Regulations in districts where the maximum building or structure shall • extends items covered to include architectural"embellishments" allows flexibility for architectural features as and not exceed 3 stories nor 35 feet in height,water standpipes (spires,towers,cupolas,domes,etc.)may exceed height limits where appropriate;note,flexibility is sought in and water tanks,church spires,belfries,cupolas, by up to 50%of permitted height,and are exempt from the 710 cases where the building is below the permitted ornamental towers and flagpoles being placed on or above foot maximum elevation limitation(P.U.D.§3.0.a.3) height,to allow the penthouse to be designed as the roof level of a building and not intended for human • penthouses over elevator shafts,antennas,chimneys and other part of the building(i.e.,with no setback) occupancy may exceed height limitation by 15 feet,to a mechanical equipment may extend up to 20 feet above the height not to exceed 50 feet(Zoning§33.5.a);antennae and permitted building height;provided however,such items shall satellite dishes may exceed permitted height as an be set back from all exterior walls a distance at least equal to the accessory use by up to 35 feet(Zoning§34.1.bb(3),(4)) vertical dimension that the penthouse extends above the actual building height(P.U.D.§3.0.a.4) • a penthouse used for housing mechanical equipment,a stairway, or elevator equipment may extend above the actual building -4 height but may not exceed it by more than 20 feet;provided, . however,the exterior walls of all penthouses exceeding the 0o permitted building height shall be set back from all exterior • walls a distance at least equal to the vertical dimension that the t , penthouse extends above the actual building height;provided further that penthouses not exceeding the permitted height shall be subject to approval at site plan approval unless such setback is provided(P.U.D.§3.0.a.5) Front Yard(General) 30 feet(Zoning§22.5.b) • FM 1709 and North Carroll Ave.: fifty(50)feet,unless a lesser twenty(20)foot setbacks requested on FM 1709 and setback is approved at site plan approval;provided that in no Carroll Avenue are consistent with a traditional downtown, event shall such setback be less than a minimum of twenty(20) and important to block development and to perceiving the feet (P.U.D.§3.0.b.1) town center as a"downtown"and not a stand-alone • Highway 114: fifty(50)feet(P.U.D.§3.0.b.2) development • Interior Public Streets: None(P.U.D.§3.0.b) Setbacks Along FM 1709,Carroll all lots within the Corridor Zone shall maintain a • FM 1709 and North Carroll Ave.: fifty(50)feet,unless a lesser twenty(20)foot setbacks requested on FM 1709 and Ave.and State Highway 114 minimum building setback of 50-feet adjacent to setback is approved at site plan approval;provided that in no Carroll Avenue are consistent with a traditional downtown, SH 114,FM 1709,and the east right-of-way of event shall such setback be less than a minimum of twenty(20) and important to block development and to perceiving the Carroll Ave.(Zoning§43.9.c.2.(a)) feet (P.U.D.§3.0.b.1) town center as a"downtown"and not a stand-alone • Highway 114: fifty(50)feet(P.U.D.§3.0.b.2) development TAm.EDOC , Page 2 :;ii • DRAFT- FOR DISCUON PURPOSES ONLY • Standard(Current) I P.U.D.Modification I Rationale Bufferyards • all lots shall maintain a minimum bufferyard • FM 1709,SH 114 and Carroll Ave.requirements are the same consistent with a traditional downtown,and necessary for of 5 feet from adjacent C-3 use(Zoning as current code creating a well-designedistreetscape §42.3;Table One) • all lots shall maintain a minimum bufferyard of 15 feet from the • all lots adjacent to a public right-of-way shall, boundary of the P.U.D.;no buffer as to interior P.U.D.lots except as provided below,maintain a (P.U.D:§3.0.b.3) minimum bufferyard of 10 feet(Zoning • bufferyards shall not be required as to lots adjacent to interior §42.3;Table Two) P.U.D.public rights-of-way(P.U.D.§3.0.b) • all lots within the Corridor Overlay Zone shall maintain a minimum bufferyard of 25 feet adjacent to SH 114 and 20 feet adjacent to FM / 1709 and the east right-of-way of Carroll Ave. (Zoning§43.9.c.3(b);Exhibits 43-B,C) Side Yard 15 feet(Zoning§22.5.c),subject to allowance for none(P.U.D.§3.0.b) consistent with a traditional downtown in which buildings zero lot line development on a common interior lot immediately abut one another line where construction of a party wall is used and where equivalent amount of open space and - plantings are provided elsewhere within the two developing lots Rear Yard 10 feet(Zoning§22.5.d) none(P.U.D.§3.0.b) consistent with a traditional downtown;adds flexibility in dealing with long-term parking needs Maximum Lot Coverage 60%(Zoning§22.5.e) 55%maximum for the P.U.D.as a whole;individual lot coverage consistent with densities associated with a traditional may be 100%(P.U.D.§3.0.c) downtown,mixing"development"blocks(i.e.,up to 100% lot coverage)with open space blocks(i.e.,0%lot coverage) Common Open Space no requirement No building shall be allowed on any land designated as Common Common open space is reserved for public use,consistent Open Space on the Concept Plan without the prior approval of City with traditional downtown open space amenities Council,with the exception of the bandshell pavilion on the block bounded by F.M.1709,Street"5",Street"C"and Street"D" TABLEDOC Page 3 • • i `"DRAFT - FOR DISCU N PURPOSES ONLY • Standard(Current) P.U.D.Modification Rationale Projections Into Required Yards- Terraces,balconies,decks,uncovered porches and • no projection permitted into a public easement or right-of-way allows for architectural interest in a downtown setting and Terraces,Balconies,etc. ornamental features which do not extend more along 1709,Carroll Ave.or 114(P.U.D.§4.0) is consistent with a traditional downtown street edge than 4 feet from the side wall line,above the • no projections allowed to extend over traveled portion of a ground floor story,may project into a required roadway(P.U.D.§4.0) side yard,provided they are 11 feet from any • any projection into a right-of-way allowed as described below adjacent side lot line and do not project into a shall be predicated on the property owner assuming all liability required front or rear yard more than 8 feet from related thereto(P.U.D.§4.0) the front or rear wall line(Zoning§33.6.a) • architectural projections,including bays,towers,oriels,etc.may project up to 42 inches into a required yard or beyond the building face(P.U.D.§4.0(c)) i/ Projections Into Required Yards- An uncovered,unenclosed porch projecting into • no projection permitted into a public easement or right-of-way allows for architectural interest in a downtown setting and Porches the front yard setback may not be more than 80 along 1709,Carroll Ave.or 114(P.U.D.§4.0) is consistent with a traditional downtown street edge square feet or project into the front yard setback • no projections allowed to extend over traveled portion of a for a distance of more than 5 feet(Zoning§33.6.b) roadway(P.U.D.§4.0) • any projection into a right-of-way allowed as described below - shall be predicated on the property owner assuming all liability related thereto(P.U.D.§4.0) • architectural projections,including bays,towers,oriels,show windows(1st floor only),etc.may project up to 42 inches into a required yard or beyond the building face(P.U.D.§4.0.c) • underground footings may project into a right-of-way up to the curb line(P.U.D.§4.0.c) .-4 TABLE.DOC Page 4 DRAFT- FOR DISC ION PURPOSES ONLY • • Standard(Current) P.U.D.Modification Rationale Projections Into Required Yards- Every part of a required yard shall be open to the • no projection permitted into a public easement or right-of-way allows for architectural interest in a downtown setting "Open Sky"Requirement sky,unobstructed by a building,except for the along 1709,Carroll Ave.or 114(P.U.D.§4.0) ordinary projections of sills,belt courses,cornices • no projections allowed to extend over traveled portion of a and ornamental features not exceeding 12 inches; roadway(P.U.D.§4.0) roof eaves may project in required side yards not • any projection into a right-of-way allowed as described below to exceed 30 inches(Zoning§33.6.c) shall be predicated on the property owner assuming all liability related thereto(P.U.D.§4.0) • ordinary building projections(pilasters,cornices,etc.)may project up to 12 inches beyond a building face or architectural projection (P.U.D.§4.0.a)(consistent with Zoning Code) • canopies and awnings and/or kiosks may project from building face and may extend to or be located within 8 inches of the curb (P.U.D.§4.0.a) • roof eaves may project up to 36 inches beyond the building face or architectural projection(P.U.D.§4.0.b) Off-Street Parking-Compact Spaces not addressed;standard parking requirement is 9 up to 35%of required parking may be compact off-street spaces recognizes most of current automobile size feet wide by 18 feet long for head-in and 8 feet by having a minimum dimension of 8 feet wide by 16 feet long(P.U.D. 22 feet for parallel(Zoning§35.3) §5.0.a) Location of Off-Street Parking • required spaces provided collectively or used • required parking shall be located and maintained within 500 feet consistent with a traditional downtown jointly by 2 or more buildings or of the building served(P.U.D.§5.0.b) establishments may be located and maintained • on-street parking and shared parking within 500 feet of a use within 300 feet of the use being served may be counted toward the parking requirements for that use (Zoning§35.2) (P.U.D.§5.0.b) ,~r • no required off-street parking space shall be • no on-street parking shall be permitted within 30 feet of a cross located within any public highway,street or street(excluding common access easements and private drives) - _ alleytright-of-way(Zoning§35.2.c) curb line(P.U.D.§5.0.c) Angled Parking where on-street parking is permitted it shall be angled parking permitted(P.U.D.§5.0.c) provides more"user friendly"on-street parking parallel parking(Zoning§35.I0.g) TAEI.EDOC Page 5 • DRAFT- FOR DISCUriN PURPOSES ONLY 4110 • Standard(Current) P.U.D.Modification Rationale Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces • General Retail Stores and Shops,and Personal • General Retail Stores and Shops,and Personal Service Shops or pursuant to shared parking reduction analysis completed by Required Service Shops or Establishments: 1 space per Establishments: 1 space per each 220 square feet of floor area Barton Aschman;does not override other shared parking each 200 square feet of floor area(Zoning (10%reduction)(P.U.D.§5.0.e) provisions of the Zoning Ordinance(cf.Zoning Ordinance. §35.6.b.(5)(a),(e)) - • General Office,Veterinarian Offices or Clinics,Banks& §35.2.a) • General Office,Veterinarian Offices or Financial Institutions,etc.: 1 space per each 330 square feet of Clinics,Banks&Financial Institutions,etc.: floor area(10%reduction)(P.U.D.§5.0.d) 1 space per each 300 square feet of floor area • on-street parking may be used in meeting requirement(P.U.D.§ (Zoning§35.6.b.(6)(a),(c),(e)) 5.0.b) Off-Street Loading-General • Commercial and Office Uses of 0 to 9,999 sq. • Office Uses of 0'to 49,999 sq.ft.of floor area of building consistent with market needs Requirements ft.of floor area in building or structure:no devoted to office uses:no regular spaces(10 feet by 25 feet)or loading spaces required;10,000 sq.ft.to large spaces(10 feet by 50 feet)required;50,000 sq.R to 49,999 sq.ft.:1 space/berth;50,000 sq.ft.to 149,999 sq.ft.:1 regular space;150,000 sq.ft.to 249,999 sq. 99,999 sq.ft.:2 spaces/berths;100,000 sq.ft. ft.:2 regular spaces;250,000 sq.ft.and up:3 regular spaces to 199,999 sq.ft.:3 spaces/berths;each (P.U.D.§6.0.b.1) additional 100,000 sq.ft.:1 additional • Retail Uses with tenant size of 0 to 9,999 sq.ft.of floor area:no space/berth(Zoning§36.6.a.1) , regular spaces or large spaces required;10,000 sq.ft.to 49,999 • Hotel/Motel,Restaurant and Similar Uses of 0 sq.ft.:1 regular space;50,000 sq.ft.to 99,999 sq.ft.:1 regular to 49,999 sq.ft.of floor area in building or and 1 large space;100,000 sq.ft.and up:2 large spaces(P.U.D. structure:no loading spaces required;50,000 §6.0.b.1) sq.ft.to 149,999 sq.ft.:1 space/berth; • Restaurant Uses with tenant size of 0 to 9,999 sq.ft.of floor 150,000 sq.ft.to 299,999 sq.ft.:2 area:no regular spaces or large spaces required;10,000 sq.ft. t j spaces/berths;300,000 sq.ft.to 499,999 sq. and up:1 regular space(P.U.D.§6.0.b.1) ft.:3 spaces/berths;500,000 sq.ft.to 999,999 • the loading requirements for multiple tenants that are each sq.ft.:4 spaces/berths;each additional 10,000 sq.ft.or larger may be combined within a single 500,000 sq.ft.:1 additional space/berth building and treated as a single tenant(P.U.D.§6.0.b.1) (Zoning§36.6.a.2) Off-Street Loading-Minimum Size at least one-half of the required off-street loading minimum size per table,based on use;no requirement of larger spaces shall have a minimum dimension of 10 feet loading size except as set forth in table(P.U.D.§6.0.a,b) by 50 feet each and the remaining required spaces or berths shall have a minimum dimension of 10 feet by 25 feet each-exclusive of turnaround and maneuvering space(Zoning§36.3) • TA6,EDOC Page 6 • • DRAFT- FOR DISCU N PURPOSES ONLY • Standard(Current) P.U.D.Modification Rationale Off-Street Loading-Location The off-street loading facilities shall be located on loading spaces that are adjacent and accessible to several buildings the same lot as the structure they are primarily or tenant spaces,including buildings and tenant spaces on separate intended to serve(Zoning§36.7.a) lots,shall be allowed to suffice for the loading requirements for the individual buildings or tenants provided the number of spaces satisfies the combined square footage of the buildings/tenants • covered(P.U.D.§6.0.b.2) Street Radiuses not in City ordinances;to be determined by City 10 foot minimum radius(P.U.D.§7.0.c) the radius is specified to create a traditional downtown engineer streetscape Cross Sections local street(non-residential)is 60 foot right-of- right-of-way varies from 60 to 83 feet;the street widths are 38 feet the right-of-way is increased to accommodate extra width way with the street width to be approved by the and 44 feet except in the downtown area where they are 58 feet to on sidewalks and in some cases increase in street width;the City engineer(§5.02 of right-of-way requirements; accommodate parallel parking(P.U.D.§7.0.c) street width has been determined by traffic analysis §5.03 of street design requirements) Sight Triangles sight triangle defined as the triangle created by • the external street and drive intersections comply with standard at intersections interior to the P.U.D.,the standard sight connecting"a point which is 10 feet along the right- - sight triangle requirements(P.U.D.§7.0.a) triangle impedes the ability to bring the buildings close of-way at the intersection and a point extending • internal street intersections shall be controlled through the use enough to the street to create the"downtown"atmosphere away from the intersection a distance of 40 feet; of appropriate traffic control devices;with automobiles coming J this line shall extend by projection to the back of to a complete stop,they will have a safe sight distance,and the C� curb on improved streets or the edge of pavement sight triangle is not necessary(P.U.D.§7.0.a) w on unimproved streets along both streets impacted • for plantings within 20 feet of any public intersection,shrubs (§8.02 of sight triangle of Subdivision;amended and ground cover shall not exceed 2 feet in height and tree . _. Ordinance No.483-A) branching shall provide 7 feet of clearance(P.U.D.§7.0.b) Screening-General Generally,as provided in Zoning§§39 and 43 screening shall be provided generally in accordance with Sections 39 modifications consistent with traditional downtown may be and 43 of the Zoning Ordinance;provided screening devices,heights anticipated at site plan approval and other elements shall be subject to modification in accordance with standards to be established at the time of site plan approval (P.U.D.§8.0) TAB E.DOC • Page 7 • i • DRAFT- FOR DISCU, lir PURPOSES.ONLY 11110 Standard(Current) P.U.D.Modification Rationale Screening-Architectural Fencing all architectural fencing which runs roughly screens comprised of planting materials shall be exempt from the "formal"hedges or other plant screens in a linear design Requirements parallel to SH 114,Carroll Ave.or FM 1709 architectural fencing offset requirements(P.U.D.§8.0) maybe desired rights-of-way shall not run in straight line without being off-set by a minimum of 6 feet every 60 feet (Zoning§43.9.c.1(e)) Location of Above-Grade Structured • accessory buildings having a permanent • above-grade structured parking facilities shall be exempt from allows for parking structures to be hidden behind buildings, Parking foundation shall be erected no closer than 10 the accessory building limitations of Section 34.2 of the Zoning per plan feet to a property line located in the rear yard Ordinance,provided that such facilities meet the applicable (Zoning§34.2(a)) i requirements of the P.U.D.for principal buildings,except for • no accessory building shall be erected within number of stories,which is not limited,and height,which is 10 feet of any other building(Zoning limited in accordance with P.U.D.Section 3.0.a.2;and provided §34.2(b)) further that the Horizontal and Vertical articulation requirements of Section 43.9 of the Zoning Ordinance shall not apply except that some Vertical Articulation(as defined)shall be provided at elevations visible from Carroll Ave.,F.M.1709, - or residential tracts located within four hundred(400)feet(gaps of fifty(50)feet or less shall be exempt)(P.U.D.§9.0.a) • visible elevations shall have a solid parapet wall of not less than forty-six(46)inches and shall utilize colors consistent with the surrounding principal buildings n • elevations set back behind building pads for future buildings shall be exempt for a period of 3 years,after which vertical • articulation or screening shall be provided if no building has been erected Accessory Structures accessory buildings shall not exceed one story or flagpoles,park pavilions or bandshells,and above-grade structured consistent with a traditional downtown;as to parking 14 feet in height(Zoning§34.2(e)) parking facilities exempted from 14 foot height limitation,but shall structures,the number of stories will be dependent upon in any event not exceed 52 feet in height(P.U.D.§10.a) market demand and requirements based on total developed area • TABLEDOC Page 8 DRAFT- FOR DISCUFOI PURPOSES ONLY 11110 Standard(Current) P.U.D.Modification Rationale Minimum Width of Enclosed or where an open space is more than 50%surrounded minimum widths based on the following alternative schedule: consistent with a traditional downtown and the goal of Partially Enclosed Open Space by a building,the minimum width of the open • "courts": 3 inches per 1 foot of building height;minimum 12 creating pedestrian scaled outdoor spaces within and space shall be at least 20 feet for one-story and one feet(P.U.D.§11.0.a) between buildings and one-half story buildings,30 feet for two-story • "closed courts": minimum area equal to twice the square of the buildings,and 40 feet for three or more story width of the court based on surrounding building height,but not buildings(Zoning§33.7) less than 250 square(P.U.D.§11.0.a) • "court niches": no portion shall be more than 3 feet(measured horizontally)from a point where the court niche is less than 3 feet wide(P.U.D.§11.0.a) defmitions of"court","closed court"and"court niche"are provided (P.U.D.§11.0.b) • Landscaping(General) generally as provided in Zoning§§42 and 43 and specifics of landscape planning requirements to be addressed more it is acknowledged that the landscape requirements for a Landscape Ordinance No.544 fully as specific site plans are submitted for review from time to time "downtown"are different than those contemplated under (P.U.D.§12.0) current ordinances;however,specific criteria,including modifications or revisions to current ordinances,shall be left open until more is known as to the specifics of site planning and building layouts Bufferyards generally,see Zoning§§42 and 43 "Landscape Zone"requirements shall apply in lieu of the Bufferyard see comments above to general landscaping requirements of Zoning§§42 and 43;landscaping to be provided for each"District Edge"and"Streetscape Zone"in accordance with minimum standards to be established at the time of site plan approval as to planting levels,quantities,spacing,additional amenities(if any),and other landscape requirements;definitions of "Landscape Zone","District Edge"and"Streetscape Zone"are provided(P.U.D.§ 12.1) Interior Landscape Areas generally,see Landscape Ordinance No.544,§3.3 the P.U.D.does not meet the requirements for interior landscape see comments above to general landscaping;the intent is to under current ordinances;specific requirements for interior concentrate open space into public parks,thus creating a landscape areas shall be determined at site plan approval(P.U.D.§ high level of public amenity,in lieu of distributing 12.2) landscape areas around and between buildings TABLLDOC Page 9 Ij • • • 111111 DRAFT- FOR DISCU N PURPOSES ONLY 4110 Standard(Current) P.U.D.Modification Rationale Irrigation All required landscape areas shall be irrigated by • irrigation not required in those instances and in those areas clarifies intent as to"native habitat"type requirements an automatic irrigation system;provided natural where installation of such a system is a)potentially harmful to meadows of wild flowers or other native habitat any preserved or existing plant materials;b)not reasonably shall not be required to be irrigated (Landscape required due to the nature of the plant material(e.g.,where Ordinance.§3.6) irrigation could be harmful to drought-tolerant species);or c) create a situation possibly harmful to public health,safety or welfare(P.U.D.§12.6) • determination of the situations where irrigation is not required shall be made and approved by the City's Landscape Administrator(P.U.D.§12.6) Outdoor Displays and Sales-General all business shall be conducted entirely within a • outdoor temporary removable displays and sales for fairs, building;outside storage and/or display of any festivals and other special events held in outdoor spaces shall be type shall be prohibited(Zoning§22.5.h) permitted with a"special events permit"(process and procedure for issuance of such permits to be determined in conjunction with site plan approval)(P.U.D.§14.0.a) • - outdoor vendor sales(with accessory display and signage)in temporary or movable structures,including sales of seasonal merchandise,fruit and vegetable market sales,sales of arts and crafts items,and other sales of a similar nature shall be allowed; provided the locations for such outdoor vendor sales shall be .-� approved as part of development plan approval(P.U.D.§ 14.0.b) • sales from kiosks shall be allowed at locations approved as part of an approved development plan,for such uses as may approved by S.U.P.from time to time(P.U.D.§14.0.c) Outdoor Displays and Sales-Timing no directly/applicable provision;compare Zoning • special events permits for outdoor temporary removable §34.1.aa(tents for the purpose of promoting retail displays and sales for fairs,etc.shall be issued by the Director sales for a period not exceeding 23 days are of Community Development for a period not to exceed 31 days authorized when constructed or operated in (P.U.D.§14.0.a) ' conjunction with a permit and in compliance with • outdoor vendor sales exceeding 3 days per week shall require a underlying development regulations of the zoning special events permit from the Director of Community district in which it is placed;provided that no more Development(P.U.D.§14.0.b) than 2 permits may be issued in any one year period,with a 60 day separation between uses TABLE.DOC Page 10 _ !)1-- 3es i " 'T` G� I�GlOP •s. __ zC �1 ��'`� ''t i £. Qly `13a1 � jr---•` �`` L. I,Ac S4¢IE7 A-rm l �' - -^4A1 i L_._. ( _-� r._.'.�.,.,��:s 3A1C2 J� '`I _- 15.56 Ac 23 2 All II 2 : --- i ! E i i 3a,a r __P�` ►1 vSvLHIN4 lA}� I N . 2G 1, \ J858 k %, 7 �'. 1 1 f I .,,' ���dy - 3A1H2 l 11 1 �01 i 1 ! li - .AG - 10.4 Ac 2F2A '1 2F1 1, f.-•.•� 00 '3•r 4A I i i _1 1 I ! 11 ` 3AIH2A 11 � :1, ,,.�'Ac:• 91 ti f 3AI1t2 3 Ac i 2F3 2F4A 26414 • r L. % d D. -'• /to 9.47 k ::: 1 JA1H3 \ 1 jj IlLEMETARY -}•} g'•4C2A iti NM JOIDEON 3AIH 3MM 67 Ac ► ! i T• tk :'ti ON •_._._' y :;: 3AIJI �r'"� �2 • 1� �� ,`�i ��j i L PA m lLi3 Ae ,n0 11 IJ� 1 11 (' 18.94 k z 0. --- T n ;i , IA- 61111 _ IN r--'J'- - " 3A1J 3A1J3 r2 2 2 2�1 _ ' S` i© SA1JiP 3A1JILr•---" •-2A1 A A A A•• / i '�.1s 1t - t 1 EAST HICAILAND STREET '� 6 5/AI 11 -4ri-irir4 l.�'RRO�� 1C CAhRULL MI IF,.,,,F,tp, �- 4E3 ---,/. 1E iH — 1 1C ,A 1D u 2, 2C l+i I!!!t fte E. CC 1 SCHI)1 L .�� i? k SA. t01A -,-`.", 4 2J 2G &75 A: 102 102A 2A•• JJjj !G •�� SD2ii_ 3A lc 3A2 I IIIB� llA ''-'r ► 2A4 8.75 Pc 24.91 k • rf� , , h'^�I SC 60.1 Ac ,• *midi j1/Lid I SURVEY A-697 ._>-.1 (�p�/�(� ENDS /,� ifs,.�-,.. 3 �5,& M 1 7� I.N.I. I�•,i I i i • -�'' R�VITYir�W® l9�®S I 3A -•,- ,,;1 i '.js' ,' SJA)£Y A-481 : SI:Y i i i i .,` OA CoT �, I 5A3 , ! i i , �r- 9T�. 1 3B< I,Ji _-._..•IN I r I_�G � C''r, 1 ,� 591A7 �i! _ V'! !mil- _ 1 + 3 SA4 .,, r 5�p1� n�! 1�� p� �n O�%_ 1y!�•4 r', U ftl�NN�°ac�--!AAI Illl�°,I1V r� " ' SGRLEY A-PO4 i �% AJ ;1 j >•u.rda. i %. _.___ - i • i I ... 501 SQ-�i- - .. :�''y 3A2 3A1 YY'' __ r ; Ea,11•..:�YrJI.aA f •��Y'_ _ ( ;,I� /�P• ds" _ ;p �s, rC, • ___ Y - _ ! i i i '�, \ _.-- 562 i1 •-1•--t--F--r �W.�G�n�--• 3E 3F :-- i ! i 1 1 5A , ffiZe i .&-.._ . []� s 11V1101.11� _ IN I _. - -_ I 0I ! i• b i --51 ..":r•': =- ; NORTHWEST PKWY EAST 25 k • ' 1 I i 11 I i f ; r �JA S13 x �� 1 I✓ ... 3 k r' RAa 7.665k 14A< I. R / 3D2 J Ac • •RA ON D r01 .�I rf•1yArk.��• `� Sly 3Gla JAB �1� 3D4 i D ; A D 3`Ail . A �G�E4ST SDUTNUKE BLVD. �, w sc JA zwi x p _ — -—�`_ 2SC - 7A .• — i 2C 2 2B t82A 102 113• i • G Zas RBU%�7 __ ,e2e ����1 C4 'kb+ At 0 16 ,1 k L. 30.6 Ac j_.,..--� MlRON _�. _ S�'• '.N 2i ,1. 15 Lr 2211 k jI DjJ Jv' I,_, 1 2 3G 302 t PP -- - 3 A` r 1 j i - I 1 1__....._....\_____ �. i f j ; 4` i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ! ," •-'r j• L`.-; / iG 2 • :a 1 a0l 4 7' .` , ! , I I , 1 '"-, • . i%' 1209 Ac "- r. • 1=_-----�`• �.jX' 1, IQ'r. i i ! I i i i i i 71 ._.Y' - - j �w' k�'•y 4E1 LE, .y X�,.. ` 1'�,,!.' 1-i I . I 1 i i i •4 ._._i_._. g<- 4 X r- . .-3t-1PJr• —{— i : --•----•-•---- 3A I -.- .�, �GIN i �? F E E vi, IY1%: pIN7 1` • - 1.,. •Z._. !..,a• •rm. ` ' •T S .�.... " ,3.6 Ac riA A 20 Ac �,_,_._.-._._..l ``1 TRACT MAP •H �r5 •30 f 5D71 Ac 1, �... jl� aaa • i i F•+•i•J.- �7 1�7 r i i 31 Pc-1/ � :KI ��'{j� ! i ti`_ I i � ) , IA3 l'" h [-- 4., ;)... • m i :1ahY/- fNlmILIF �.! .!1, 411, Adjacent Land Owners and Zoning SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#4 JANET MURPHY Case No. ZA-145 2 ...., 3 4 IIIIII Proposed Site • 1 3 26' - 5 k . a j� 8 OF 2R - • A-- • '. -10 • 24- •. i -11 • 23- 22- . -1 21 , -13 r I ` . - 1-=r1, 20 1 1 1 t ! 14 • i" 19 18 17 16 15 "4'- �1'.71q ,`1i��® 10-____ __ 1. Greenway Carroll Road Prt 1. C3 15. u.McBride 15. C2 14- i . \�i 2. Timarron Land Corp.` 2. AG 16. J.Bacon 16. SP-2 . ; 3. Timarron Land Corp 3. AG 17. E.Taylor 17. 01 " 4. Timarron Land Corp 4. AG 18. Smock&Husseini JV 18. 01 i;'i I \ •5. Timarron Land Corp 5. AG 19. M.L.Dalton 19. C2 4 l7 6. L.Berk 6. AG 20. A.Prade 20. C2 , 4.S1 N\ 7. L.Berk 7. AG 21. CFN Vests Southlake JV 21. AG • \NNI - \ r 8. L.Berk 8. AG 22. J.Strunck 22. AG ►k, 9. L.Berk 9. AG 23. Mendez LTD. 23. AG .,pr, 10. C.Perterka 10. C3 24. B.Paulsen 24. SF-20A �'' _ _ _ 11. Home Depot USA 11. C3 25. Southview Phase II JV 25. SF-20A .''wjo . . 12. J.Farrar 12. C3 26. City of Southlake 26. CS �� olt° , ` 13: J.Farrar 13. C3 N. . µIRS 14. G.Miron 14. C2 City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Sase No: ZA 96-145 Review No: Three Date of Review: 1/03/97 Project Name: Concept Plan for a Non-Residential PUD -Southlake Town Center. 109.330 acres situated in the Richard Eads Survey.Abstract No. 481 APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Rialto Development, L.P. Graham Associates, Inc. 1723 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 110 616 Six Flags Drive, Suite 400 Southlake, Texas 76092 Arlington, Texas 76011 Phone : (817) 329-8400 Phone : (817) 640-8535 Fax : (817) 251-8717 Attn: Brian Stebbins Fax : (817) 633-5240 Attn: Jeff Williams CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/21/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. .i.{f.:;:•}::•ii;>.:•:Yi ':.:4}}::•}:•}}vn::}: r:,'1.•}'f}.v..f.}:.•i.y.,,v,.,,•:::.;.}•:.:::x..r.•:•r.•::.nv .......... ....:::n•.-:r::::::u.v::uv.•.,•:t::::::::::{:{{.y.}v:::::x:{:.:n}•9}:•}}:yi::.Y{.}•{r.}, •.v.•:.w.:v.}}•{. :p}•.:::{i.•.,v t:.;C}}};•:x,.•.•::{:r:i•}},vx.}:•.wn F r. ..{. }.... •...:::::::::•:. ..:::.,•::.v.•.:.vnv::::::.v::.rr:::...:...v:::.....:.::::.v::::.:.:.:................:.......vf'.:.v:::::.v..:..v,.....v...2..::.i.....v..v..:.:...........::n•.:::...............:. r.:.{,• :.xv.......:.{•:::::::::}.•.•::::.v *Due to the uniqueness of a PUD zoning request,we have divided our comments into two groupings. First will be those comments which are based on ordinance requirements and second will be comments that we are offering as observations for consideration by the Council. It is our hoperthat this format will aid the Council in evaluating issues relating to the proposed development. ollowing are comments based on ordinance requirements: 1. Correct the easements shown Village Center Phase 2 - Cabinet A, Slides 3095 & 3096.Provide the lot and block numbers for all surrounding platted properties. Verify/correct the lotting and owner(s) shown for Lot 1, Block 1, Gorbutt Addition. Our records indicate it is a single lot with one owner. 2. Provide an exhibit of the proposed site triangles with a reference to the exhibit in Appendix"X",item 7.0.a. 3. Correct the building envelope shown in the northwest block adjacent to SH 114 so as not to encroach the 50'building setback line along"future" SH 114. Following are observations that we offer for the Council to evaluate during their review: A. Appendix "X", item 3.a.3: It would appear that the architectural elements could be 26' above a building with a 52' height. B. Appendix"X", item 3.a.4: May want to consider replacing"permitted" building height in the third line to "actual" height. C. Appendix"X",item 3.a.5: May want to consider deleting"not" from the last sentence"... provided, • however,penthouses riot exceeding the permitted building height shall be subject to approval at the applicable site plan unless such setback(s) are provided." 7C-19 14 City of Southlake,Texas D. Appendix"X", item 5.c: May want to define where on-street parking is permitted it is permitted. May want to consider removing from the request the portion of the PUD request west of Carroll. The provisions of the ordinance as currently drafted could allow buildings without setbacks or could allow the provisions of displaced open space to be located west of Carroll. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709 and SH 114 * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a development plan, a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, building plans,must be submitted for approval and Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * This review is based on the "C-3" Zoning District Regulations. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 1/13/97. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" • _ revised reduction must be provided. Following are items related to the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission: ' ' P & Z Action: December 5, 1996; Approved (3-2) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 1, 1996 and making the following changes to Appendix "X" dated November 21, 1996 and the supplemental Appendix "X" received November 25, 1996: • § 1 -Permitted Uses Delete the following uses - filling stations or service stations and frozen food lockers (a small meat market not exceeding 3,000 s.f. would be OK). Permit the following uses by Specific Use Permit only - electrical and gas repair and installation services, etc.; lodges, sororities and/or fraternities; medical care facilities requiring or allowing an overnight stay, etc.; mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers; plumbing and heating appliance repair and installation services, etc. • 7C-20 City of Southlake,Texas • § 3 - Development Regulations a. Building Height 1. Add the beginning phrase: "In the event that . . .is constructed, it may . . ." 2: Change the height of parking structures to: "shall not exceed forty-two (42) feet from ground elevation nor forty- five (45) feet in total height unless approved by Specific Use Permit for a height not exceeding fifty (50) feet. b. Front, Side and Rear Yards 1. Change to the following: "Building along Highway 1709 and the east right-of-way of Carroll Avenue shall maintain a minimum fifty (50) foot setback, unless a lessor setback is approvved at the time of site plan approval; provided, however, in no event shall the setback be less than twenty (20) feet and in the event the Carroll Avenue right-of-way . c. Maximum Lot Coverage: change sixty percent(60%) to fifty-five percent (55%) • § 5 - Off-Street Parking a. Change the number of compact spaces from thirty-five percent (35%) of the total spaces to twenty-five percent (25%) of the total spaces. • • § 9 - Above Grade Structures Parking • a. Delete reference to "Section 10.0b of this Appendix X" from the first sentence of this section and change the height limitation to the following: forty-two (42) feet from ground elevation, forty-five (45) feet in total height, unless approved by Specific Use Permit for a height not exceeding fifty(50) feet. In the last sentence of the second paragraph, add the following: "as approved by the City." • § 10 - Accessory Structures - a.1., 2., 3: - flagpoles, park pavilions or bandshells, above grade structures parking facilities: shall not exceed forty-two (42) feet from ground elevation nor forty-five (45) feet in total height unless approved by Specific Use Permit for a height not exceeding fifty (50) feet. •. § 12.0 - Landscape and Bufferyards In the last sentence, change the'following: ". . .and shall may vary and supersede . . ." • § 12.1 - Landscape Zones Adjacent to Street Right-of-Way: In the third sentence, change the following: ". . .shall may apply in lieu of the Bufferyard . . ." • § 12.2 - Interior Landscape Areas Delete the existing language in its entirety and substitute the following: "All interior landscaping shall be determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the time of site plan approval." - I 7C-21 City of South lake,Texas • § 14 - Outdoor displays and Sales III a. Special Events Permits: Change the approval from the Director of Community Development to the City. • Add a subsection "d." to read as follows: "The process and procedure for Special Events Permits shall be defined at the time of the initial site plan approval." • § 15 - Bandshell Park Open Space This section was deleted in its entirety. Additional P & Z recommendations: • Label the Bandshell area as "common open space." • Provide a twenty-five (25) foot bufferyard on the east property line. • Allow the flexibility to adjust the location of the east-west interior road to align with Mr. Strunck's driveway and thus ensuring ingress-egress to Mr. Strunck's property. • Mitigate any tree issues at the time of site plan approval. • Insert in the appropriate section of Appendix X that no buildings will be placed on any common open space with the exception of the bandshell designated on the Concept Plan. All of the above recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission have been incorporated into the plan with the following exceptions: III § 3 -Development Regulations a. Building Height 2. Change the height of parking structures to: "... nor forty-five (45)feet in total height ... " § 10 -Accessory Structures a.1.,.2., 3. -flagpoles, park pavilions or bandshells, above grade structures parking facilities: shall not exceed forty-two (42)feet from ground elevation nor forty-five (45)feet in total height unless approved by Specific Use Permit for a height not exceeding fifty (50)feet. Provide a twenty-five (25)foot bufferyard on the east property line. Allow the flexibility to adjust the location of the east-west interior road to align with Mr. Strunck's driveway and thus ensuring ingress-egress to Mr. Strunck's property.: (Unknown as to the incorporation of this item). Mitigate any tree issues at the time of site plan approval. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Rialto Development, L.P. Graham Associates, Inc. • :\W P-FILES\REV\96\96-145CP.3 7C-22 . PROPOSED. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT • - for • • .:_... • Proposed Non—Residential P.U.D. District Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas October 14, 1996 -.Al.,. • • ,Ill -_-=__- _: • GAMSCOWW Ipil•tutll[,[ ----- :-•• • Co• .,•Ir.fl•. [ _ -_- -- I'' '['`~`"' t�` MONT Il CCIM,K /..r.TRACT �_ ••�---•- . • N l • Vr• IwN••• • I = �44 Y''y,� 8• ,� all. - '•..�• i' y .�[•• IV NM[ . • E fl::l j W :'"' z . v0•Il L• t '� (1. rtwrurs b.po I .n.Ou.R b fT es ,•T ,1 MI. • {: R I.lr.frl.Olf• '[ , • f + / I•. ,... 14 '.S n 1.M1.M..lf • '' n,.•lnp•.00 mlf•dr Cl.....""• rY 1!'bY•• r• IlLI,.•[Ir.rO '',...-11:::. t.. i It. �•lN.� Imar j _ 7 Y gfill rP:3'.."7. :_ ! ...1........rs'•1.AI%.* vo...••••'"e'ro.r.a.''''''''''' ) . ••••,......... . i I own owe Oa. .......a.L. ccaro u.•�ii• •ri'Tn'.e.I ltil !!•-• t �. ' -= - IIO.I..•/C•/:-W n fT-/[r••u0[f l•OOI.• • • •. . w.rf.•il . • -ir.�a;--'ii"o.i6r---- i • if110••• m.•]0 n r.lO.11.flf C.l.fl0.lt•.al Co 'nn.•uLrl an.•uT.o nfr..MAT Tss...ur.•I • • • -• - -L'.7� - . �_Z...7........_...w....-_. • • • .... .. ...., ,•.. .., __ :..,:. .:„,„,,, . •.. . • • _._. • • .. makt,h • ....„....,,. • . . . . • . . . . . • . • VICINTre YAP • ;3. • '. "•=kN r::ritit'''rt�r•"a.T�Pa .SOUTHLAKE TOWN. CENTER RIALTO DEVELOPMENT • �• I.TI.C..[„[1G,.CG .l..l, ,•cmn.amAfmn.wG arrttuxn r,•, • cTa ocwmc CUM MOOITR MG • w fM m• .I.IaI.- MI foram PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT " � — COO MUMS, ,E.1Pi•.anam • • • • . • .. • • 7C-23 REC'D DEC 0 91996 ZONING & LAND USE PLAN for - ' Proposed Non—Residential P.U.D. District • • _• Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas • October 14, •1996 • 2 (M ❑M E,t,tE ! — • a� - 0. • IpA.1I _ o '`f _-_- -mot'_ • to`C'P�`---Fqt •. ` — g` Cfc— oi•v6t W HALL ° [ .._ f� � l • ill 'Oats �`EG�` RICHARD EADS x- • ifli ; :: n USE W.W. HAL ►E • o •q .AG .I" THOMAS-^iHAN aQ v ctrt CS 1--.C.' �jEl_ 111 f-.a..r ,emu 7•_< :. I^C _ tipF �_ Ill�;l nl l! - o P • .It j SOtN C�45•1": ■ IT ,i I .Ign Est�t " .. • I�,cnE/' usE f 11 lei• Z 4 __ —�`. • 0 ., ALL h�s"il11,II�f +iRoll 4f'I Al I Ii,14 ^�",.xn r..,E.:r • tit? 7— ('3'�' - •giiiii::,.:::t't;g vimii'•if il_•�I i.•Y• C3.• S+ // Jl'�c�liMiil'si?: i`ii!I illi!.• i'•� i mac use f omm�' I IIi.t111.I ilnil rIII.IIIi l II,I' iiii I i o� Nlla.. { !iiiilii•i:t t,i :•.!•: ::Li.I.• : tt AG• AG .60-67A• tcotwn• t, Of -- sa.91KA• .• ,0rt.r,. . _• PE9Im'IX' r.a•w o••w•C; . '''' SP2 - _ 0�'S . KM UM Gf -• MlgO USE MI,80 VSE t .B-DIAH W. kNI6 T O — O� J \ , 5 ..to E• ' • 7t.l,o acne t • EMIR I • ••-Y,• sirgl lu ' ,cw„carat Y. :;;K,Iofw,IK pI1K I''• .�KSIpwi1K A y KIK w.,.,Kl�nl.p. .. ` '�.'. ++.Ic:,�srn� y • •v1 K.[ I(tu nil K•w • �L:•A.�:.►. 'vlciffi7Y MAP- : „ZTA,-, r.°` SOUTHLAKE TOWN • CENTER RIALTO DEVELOPMENT. ...t. • "` rue 0=s m°''�"` ZONING & LAND USE' PLAN wl.a A7NEah W1- In • • • • 7C-24 REC'D DEC 0 91996 • • • MAP OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY ', OWNERS for • Proposed ' Non—Residential P.U.D: District Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas • October 14, 1996 f02 .•M 102A • IC 21 I N. ueI g w _ L • M.. , I 2u • pOON 1 M,.1 O • • RICH• RD. EADS ]' Da CaP"0 < sun ET .-101 PKS ST9TF OA�ES ,. '��f �� 4,0 ® a-7 ..,• .r9J • THOMAS — (AHAN ,� m 6 O SURVEY .-f 0A9 CITY• ® '\?` 2. \\ : :. HALL _ '1 O -2�,. z<, ter—x� 60 xl— MIME 4 ����s7 co.Oi %\ ]� ®® VeP1P�W p0 C\Soar.ono.10 5 $ • � 0 ePEW g 4. r • P.U.D. ZNo ~ �— © BOUNDARY • 0 SA330VILLAGE CENTER ]m1 x za1/� PHASE 2 O ® CA3.A.SLIM 3095 C 3096 ].e 7.665 Ae 3.4 AC b 301 ]AL O • km 30 /( /J ' 303.1\ 1 304 0 —` 30 P.M. 17091 2a2 ® �,� . _ °`BEAST SOVTN..KE KV,. o�° 0 74 0 0. o 0 0�;p o ° ,32 132• APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN II. 1� C SOUTHLAKE COMMONS GOP -Thick `.,i� 15 Ac • 33.a Ae M T.�'j,0,"x 90, to 301 �?w0.'Q'a.0.o.�.n,K - 1S Aei 0 E.r. OU! - - _ A'jA.COC 22.11AC • Cr0 u,1,.i IMO I,p.a.. MO a • wm • ■ �,.V rv).iif•_r' • ` }} ({ry} (y(,q IK1 rt.Iv4 ones �p� .per"S�C/t'.CO-•pin.. ,,,, • C Aiw UM 1]90 r1�•tq i` •.� 1`j y�Axi •1," 1 02e) A7d1 role: Awns From.6J1.A 1✓aW,10M I.��-AIII' u 0 A 7.',71 - - 4!gI1C1Y011p lea Ply MOM O T L!t7, (i )V. 'Ai l IOW IYnu111.1p1 r. uO IR 111 BA �A.�J 11 1(i l•.g (({ q 0I IR fWu e61MV ye 1Hu31RC �`= �1JJI ii9 '',�i,'. 1 JI 11.CWI�E,:OC.IA.oco.CO. 1107J .JJ Y[RI:?'.Tj�7`�,,;71�y . . J7 .aC MOOT us• ':7El I'.r�'Z^'I~fi. • .03 e',oE 1.R1SpA COP. .I MIJ J.O. yLL'`�-J�O �I .�rdAlj� • 75 9E19 CRC.COa.1111C5, 115. ' .a116 9! i)'.(.t�utii inA . ><Ya.nIR 9.AY..it.4 • f0179 .3r6 • VICINITY YAP. • "3"M' ""°IL"'A" AP2Mmuin IN4 •SOUTHLAKE TOWN CENTER RIALTO DEVELOPMENT E. 7AKOSCAK AIC3RO.T BMW.AMOK.LItIIG6TOK.MC OM w6IKmE CA MAY 15S0CIA77$DM "4/718 � �CN11"11Ta N` MAP OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS • s�' 7AKY CS.1T70fOfR. 77MOK]A CnG1Y5T • • 0 - 7C-25 RECD DEC 0 91996 • MAJOR THOROUGHFARE (Sc INTERIOR. STREET PLAN • for S . Proposed Non—Residential P.U.D. District ell Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas October 14, 1996 • N. \ . • • N NOTE: ALL LAND USES WITHIN THE PROPOSED P.Q.D. ARE IN . CITY • ACCORDANCE WITH ALLOWABLE USES IN C-3 ZONING,' • ' HALL • •AS MODIFIED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF c.E DM P.U,O, . 4 THIS P.U.D. +�. 4 N. �!�\ /BOUNDARY - asp ,• ` • ta. $ \ . \i , c•O Ntts , a 1y j O C.]YE:Ig \ 1 \ 82.3'a i p 4iTi..`A l 1 1 . / P.U.O. o ••• ..//7 . ' BOUNDARYi/ . ' i/(///1/ / e-s oats w \ ''� :// i • MS %MET N. EA'N.0.N. • . •' P.U.O. i . I: BOUNDARY �N - C.3 L1111, .../ I— .» T W al • En Ill•TE .. ,.l;o•\\ ..�'I••L'—_.T-.- /Il L. 4 / / .. eo•a.¢N.,__ 777 J a IIILIMIE . Ea'".4.Y.• . ' •,. 11 L •mi, F tO.I c.a MS C9 Ktl .O'coma.,/CCM ESN, Yy i �W a.'�Y. •I.• P.UD. BOUNDAR Y a k i • , 11 r i I ` _. - . _ _-- - � _ • Eur aamnrtc one pAL flan . • •(,. .. .. .._ 1.:Ni ./' r• PROPOSED ship.:rl',�i j I I TRAFFIC • `F°1:•.-�,S SIGNAL Or''A-iP:2•'=`I OPEN VA1401 Mk KPICA • D.D RAM • \.DRIVE 0 I_.1 ►1Ir,�',••`', • CPofof.OPLY SPACE IC AI ACIEa ' •r. MOWED I 1,.Y•,llRr. MAID.'LaI acat•Mariam.LDI APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN � 1..uy9t41asr:;.1 j 1 COr WE ROI•AOCKDATE EON L.}y R $.."r0! :7 y PLKEYTACE [DI N.U.D. SOUTHLAKE COMMONS �, t. Ea=:1ni14S:II�J,1 W ILDAELE LOT. IC0E I (rm L�rtIY0.11t 1.r ALLOTTED EC c-0 r M . • VICINITY HAP •a ixo wo,,. on .&`oT rJBAL"'Tl 00 SOUTHLAKE TOWN. CENTER A"'.""� • u"Ts"n AECIRill PIMA SACOOK pT1WTLIK DIG • RIALTO DEVELOPMENT GILL DOME= CAAIAY ATOCCATE;IND • WARM wuYEo n,RCN T ucn.I A9aC1Am TYe MAJOR THOROUGHFARE & INTERIOR STREET PLAN - .Tm us aTEDa"m AmvEITa A cIICINtST • • ' 7C-26 RECp DEC 0 91996 T---------- oi 1\ls -----7---------7---ExAsTN -.' - • tri. - opo 913F.vE T N- 8c 8 . for col p.u.b. , Di ct -BeSiden-1 , Texas ,...vAt ;, ' r-11 •, / '0.1 i •I'ropoSesamit...tr. e.02abrerran.t14.Colugn9t6Y' • \t,.' / / Iii, / • . ' / f ,. ...-..-,......- 19 \\ / .,.,.71,.r:ii.'k2..AVtt, 10 . s- i .. i' & ..,?0-„.,,,,,( i . ,*3/4,.....„: -s.-...,), ...•:1,..:. 4X.,*:,‘,:01,,t,vs‘v. t.,:. •;-,. o't:lf,,„:,:t...::::„. 1 s Al' \ • 'exr.o\s-s--..•,,..- ; li..., -.,,:,...,,,N, \'-','‘ A , 1;i/4444-2-7--.-t'f!,.-04,(40::,t---% ', t••••-. ., ,'$.1,,z, _ .1 45°1', - .1:1)`\1111Ci ‘;':'4:\\\ \ ---e rs:-%-f;: ii .,., It' ',..;--,---i , ..,11,,,,miiry:$-. 1\ \., '0,'1.,.• 0-,*i:=',•,2,-...tiVi,k. i‘,w,; itex, .; , 4,.:ar,,:z..,,,,,..,:,,,,ii;4,4,....,,,,.., : • . ,,,,,x4.1:;,,A;;;,,1di -it,- ,-:- .,'... ', . , ...,,r-•-• ,111:,/,,,,', /4-:. r. -.- -1,-.*. ..,-<•-•,,,,.;-. . . -:l''' ;‘ I ii„‘*1 '‘111M/' ' '' '-'-: ft.V 7,1-- .... .---.t4:!-K;; •' -.''-- . . "t'' ,1 .t4.., ',= ••:::- ' :".'''''‘'''',l't 'I .-'" "1'41;/or>'•;". :::.4.*•.....4.*•••.t.',V:••• ••••:t.. .oti:410::/;Ps`,1`,t tti %ft"'lir/ t" : /, .'•••••''' :5`t;•:''''' •••'..'-',•:W4,,;:i'(,/ ••01',',. t. ••-st, '-1 '•/11///•.....5.1 1—.,..y.,••.. ... k.,4,,L)K''.'!..,i,F.:.!4,,,„ tr ,.,;.,41;;;!„:(2,, , , ,,. , ,,;7 \Oi/ ,-,,,,,.....--,/./, .-9,c.._ ,' -,,,,v,-:•:‘,-,,, . ..-:---- '"5/K .6:,Y0 ‘, --1 :, i "Ir'5 1 li '':'---, , r, : t :/,, , ..•i 1 '-''' ,...4,,.-•=zN:::'-‘,,,,..... 1-I,.:-7-_,_. „---IT,-. % ''''''0 V t '1 '-- '').•"; 4-1-' '..,\<* " '‘';Y 4; (- V•••-. ''..4-, 7.--4::„..:.-.*;.-.-._ : :','0,,,.,, ,itz:e..:?:0-tt( ),PI ., ,,, 1, ,. ',, "--...:,),,,; -„.‘„,,•.;.,v,y,;., ,,„ --.1.•,. :,..., •• ....‘„ , ,v i 1.!..;:. ,,'-:-.N,,... 4'jfil.' ',, C ': .‘:''' ?1.16://::::—:•‘:"N.\s`:\‘-:A\%tl:',1*-1.:**---'''.-*--t--1 ! -rj,:l';'?";'''''-`,3rtina!,0\c\\( \ \-- -‘),1144 - " /0.vi/o :14(?)(1,J.-)// , •::";":::"„:';',:;_• :::,"::-:=..i.:21---,,-. :::•z:_l'`,..:,..- .11'^‘ t:\f -,;:*: ,laiiiill', ,,.1,,1,V. \-7 1 ft /001 / ii" 41 t.,',11%.''',' \7,-,t ‘`'N •<-'j-r;`-4:-.1-r-T-:".---t.---::•-.1:;::.•::-, •'..•:::•-• -I ‘ii '‘:6,,,,Ii:Ii..-; Ii)),):1)? 't,\\ \ iltiVe //.4 fiiiii1W •( .„,:::.,,,„1 ,.-, .tAilci;z„..„•:',::., -,:-Z;I:i „ , \-,:f.:,r;37„";'1,0? )11 .,; *A." "-• ::'-:,''..'-'- . ,tt, 1„,:no 4,gl„ ts .,,,1 : (1-:.. i , „:„,., ,11,1,:,•• vr,;--- ,,,111-(1.---<J1:-.-----...::::::::::::-4;,---• r . ...,A. „.„,,,,r,, „,,,.,, ,.„ :,\,:, , , , „. „„_•, ... „../..,,,,, ,„„):: ,:44 , ,,„_,..„,.,,,..,,,:„,,...„,____...... ,...,.. , _.,.:„.. N,ef 4 tilt:,1,2,,t,, '1 :, Lis' 4//,r„-, --,z;:‘-Y'' i ?,...'..g4;4 ; , , ...•:=,..,,-,,:‘,)ii:.,,x:,,,;--.;;•_-:•.--:::3--„,::::..:s: -::,,• t C'ree!. ''..'. .'•,%,''.\ 1, ' / -1,4-'1,::=`" ,...%.,4----;-:'' ,,,,..:;:-',-Y 1 o• Z t,'",----•';',S,;5:,.i:1,7..?.,,:,:_z.:-.1-4,-. ..a.:';'.'13 , :',-,,,,s- 1/4-,,07.--:',: , ;‘...•:1 1 • 1, --1, ,fp/r .. „41." .: 0 .'i.-1, 00 4...-:,),A(.;-,-.-;.-!:::3,; :.:,::,,,,,,,=,s5,g,-ir, v ‘;- /AVI.----:•----.5„-i, k_./".'ii k);/ ')If.-,::,=-sV ,-;.,aFf.,:f•fritti.li(10;,..1),: , , 1 •;'‘' ei' s',',.';,-,-"-.-..:•,,ifig il ,i t ow',..---,,:c,rot,,,,,,ns*Ni ---;•:',.::-.., , .24.:-•;-y,a1:::4-1--,k--!--.:_zt.e,PWAIY4 ') •-'.. ,',I' \\'•f '' - ::!tl) i, I lii lill'::; , :'''Ticc,r•o:r.p, ; J.i.:,:,k\---'fr,:•:::;:::.11,,:70; .4.;;A y,c ivo,11)11..:1, • . '1,„,i1 •-•)-,:7,1,,,t1/141).1,1)) 1 /T17,it,‘•„., ;,,,,,I 0'.1.3)?? 1.70 "VO /b.:- : 1,4- .iik,41Z,N1 ''' t -v. i <Nib",0.,"/,i \• / i ilmo.,d, :-.-..-.1,\-0,.1L,e,,,,,icA,vt-_,‘;:..g.::•;-i( 7ff ,/ ////ir,,,,A41 i/.1:1110.:11\\,' • ' \'-'''', 41.7//,'.1,1,---‘-' '1 7 .1 i ..ill)el r;.:\\.goi,iii,t, -;.%./-11; '7."---3-11,1,1.1"; //.,. (- 1\ ,/ /frilli)) 1) 1 y'l. \111::\"Ili/ _:oh'off!iii.P., gr. N'.4%.,,':(//„./.•,,,,,,,,vfi: !•'/ c_`.;,,,.) -,•-,,if',.;iii,'''',;:. fic• I, ..s. s--1 owl iv. i --tvqiiiiiii 11..,:11.,-,-,V171,,:: ;Illq;5/7/). ff. 4,?)/(;,'"14.51,11\rf• ,V, / :,\-1,,,,k,'";,:ivi,c,(:: )111, :11111,1i i I.i i. t,v-:::.3 Vitt;q • 9' fri:P.,,,/f ii;O:fi'-*;jj . - • 0 \ V' \4 ,' i / , , ') ., ,,.,.;1.,,(1,, 4iiiiiiiiiiiil i I .,s,----",;-2.1F-7,1/Slierilill 'AB PriV.91,11;:-4iff:',:b) 40,,,,,y;( ; : : .. ,, , -.4„,--A.1,-,..... -.....,,,, , , „ /- 4 ,1 , . 4. '-i/e,.._ tfigli.2)1S -1) /aP81,140 .?'1X44140fl '''''' ..),,,,-,7/It-NI,/It t t'i "---- s'l -\V:si, s. :,:-•••.-^4:/,'%;..1;710:11/ --,/1 i ii,;„;,y,,opli,ii..71:,,,,it,z,.4,, . ,,,,,,74,*,f4„, 1-, ;jlrc,'•:////1 Ili 1 i O• 47'It Z. •`.‘.:,".N.:":...,;(:•://,1*? /4 1 . iiiiiirl;li•Jp'.1.0 ICC:170111(iii)119' ' 1 I 1..‘"01\l'.11. i rt..)li)\114 r'...\'‘`-'ss::\ .\V:s‘s:t .'4•°1:41/ ii,./( c ',14/4/%4illiig1411/1/"Iiiiiii1111)1ii1,\. 41.1 ' I V20.4./(41/(27)414../‘`••\'N't\::' N... ...ts::','::••::.:*;fr/(4/0 1 i i t ..4%//01+741/0411:.#114•• ('•• if f 11/11 1 i 11 I I' \\kt‘1•' '. I i 1.-\\!Aft t'144•4;14:t;;'-/.,;.4.."),((01,:iAtil,,,a1,,1i 1"1O.lid li 1. .%'•:s."' 4•1-: %.f. l it. a tk..4i..:1 fi 4°4710924V 17' 4---..-.. At '(-/- , 7/ i ,..„'` \r-...\•<-;--....:-....‘-r"-°- ,.-....0,' , ,,rfling ..i.,-,•-•-•:s.-,f4-----..-.----, ----;'') ....--, og•‘;,1-'• . . P.; .p, t,,,I fi i • \,..:•-..: „....4. ,---s( • ,,-.•;'_„ - ---,,,,,,7, ( ( . c---' .,s-,.‘"'•,--'•..---'-,-,;..- AW,____,....:41.:4, • 0 shl...,) ;11, •\t . •,..s. ,,,c-,21-,-=, i,...../71m(, .0,.......„... -,...,,j.,-.::-..,,,-....;.----.7-..:•-r-------- - ti6F,....,,,Aviesa.„-), ,. 4 4•' ... -••••-• :-.2-•-•,_-Z•" Wig 1 t KV...\,s4: tr...".... 4--1-•4=---••• ..•111ir....,*„.•„,Pritralt41, 1,•....t.i 1:1„,.....:_„....‘,.....**..:••••• :.•- ..s,,, <,....‹.7..%s......c „_•.• s''''.4::•eer''''''''' Wa..kif411:46:f411.1-i s '''‘‘''' 1 43 ...4------------,....'*••e'• ----- 1 f.." '' . •‘IF.T1Li/P•r•Wt141iMV•11' -if• ''' tj/VI/1.--.'-' . t."': • • 45eliti".131'10211•Ct 414,4•4, .,1-1-4)4‘4 ••••• ‘••• ' Ah:1-4.13P14.•. • . ;II'. • '•••' t ' ' • . • '46140.1 140 . . ' . . • ' • . °?lietIc10 DEVELOPMENT • ri,()V CFNIETt RUa5 'et- .. .'-. ' • ' , • ' E • ..•- - CONDITIONS . - 0/sica"':',..;;;i•-"'"*. '" - VS1 - - • ,...01,,,•„„,„„,_.,.. 0 'Stilt ozu,..z.n„: „,:,, ...g,..„„,...,.... TOP crnu smottarko'llgs b°IC"'2° LOW in$1 41"" , . __ 0 .• • .._______--------"-------- • . . • ' . . . , . . REM)DEC O 5 1996 . . - • • - .----"AB:Et" • AVN IN G r)ft for p,U.D. Distri .. _ vciST k ReSiden courit.Y. . ''' • t.t 7,..11 ' ; ,t I i ' I L;41:11 1 ,0seu . . Tarrant • 096 .. ;•-4,,1 . /1,17,4 . 4„ „.t I,,,\ . .pro r soutbiak.e, , -ber 14, . oct,0 ,— . • .:-Nryctl.:.!•T‘1,11°T,I•ks,\A . -,,,.. ...., °. --.° • .---°I.;‘...,- . I ..,V-,,\14,_L.41:1A`t""`"1:,1,,11..`,... „'::..-, ,,..,‘,:,,,::,\.'. '_•, `,. .• ''zl'i.;;•;•:: ,°-"" „..,',,,,,•;,.:',f,,T,',:-....,.'''"' .,,,...,.. .s‘ =',11:‘,‘'I:14'1411i.4."''''‘'''::::::••• \'''''',‘:::',:(=i42// C ‘:, 1'. 7-4Ti:,,,,: k... "`r•"i'h1:7.'i=4,, • V ; ---•_•:',\:/11111:C's, : :\a,\• s'1-7.'t l'(•!s's'zZ:1-:, k..3-,..,,,,..___ '"•4:11:ti"IX":1:L.. . , , • , c •,,----:121;14,/,,;;;'•\Y.;`‘, . ta•et'• 1 N%-,,.,,!•-::••,„ `'-‘,..‘rt..--., - '• . ,/ .t tki z'cirl.s,1,... 1:4‘,q111,VPK,','"% I ,etP11311, i---•, 1.-- t;, •::.,'•,,q1h't,t.k... TA;.;14 t, lita-L .;• ;;:;:;;Aiiiiiit';';',,i';`;%, ' ssl,' ia, ,,./1 -,-;-L.75--;;;‘•--. ..,,..ii'll.,. --_ • t. "It'Z'- ' )11/(.1t1?),\ICII4i:1\\‘, ....ss.‘111 ''1,111;::".:::'-';‘1)"..-\_-_>‘,: :::C-4L•24:3;141;-:-•,-,,,,,,_ ia,'‘,.'""`" '• \ ii;'. r ).•‘; i.' 1 '4:41 ,j)'il,,(, V.., ) 1,,, I, Ivifil'fl,:f-a, / i.---,-.-.-;= ,,,-.i.:.,"-.... e-t.:4',.,-,. .-4.-::,t, 11':;c1.:. ::- ' "--.:490.,.4,;(;,.}1\ 1 ts.:\-k„ 7..."://,::-,,,-1. \ ./c---/..-;--,:-:::•::::72,:••41 1‘ -,N4.-4, -.; :::::..-..•••.,..-_,,...„ ; '‘'‘1,i 7 ."..-'f-7--:,, p -"":&;:i"-jr,,'--, •,, '1,";.;,,ti ),'"1.‘_.:•••(..,v, .,,-.!••:K-,,,':,'-f,‘i,3,:;-•,...r:.'ic,,: -,:'-•• ;,..,.---z•::::-.3=-,-,,,,:—... , ..,\ ., , .-___,,,,,,l. ---____----.-_-_•:;31-,,..„.....„,, • . .i if, ,........:::••;;:: ,v111,,,,,,\I\1,,•-•, --.,• r,."iA\i•4.L..'''1,-,-:,'-.,-)''';z.:'i):,,:z‘:.•:t0•sek:,;0;,';.'‘.,,.,q,/,;:4,.1:-(,41:/.:.,(i.?. k(\i,I:1. i1-.s,-I•,.„„.:••:•,:,/./ft,)(,,l>.n./,'-;-,'./„"i;',-f11i:::,,:.-:.,•::,,t-:-..,1I:. \.:::-s,:.,::‘N:,•:,\;‘,., ,..k\01k1:\i.v1lvst,.,!; 1.111 k )\1 ) 1 _--I.-:--:.,1'1 211-1-P•••,....',-:-=::._4:,::,.—:.,.?.---.7-r:_-':-;:7-.i-1,:'m,..:„t:,.::-..:::_::_,„-',-:--„-:,-:-:--'.-z,---°-,,-,---.-,.-,'•2•.„.:..-::;,::-;.,•:,:7-,,„:-z;4.„:"-----:-.!4,;:-.."2:!:'`,,•-:,-.:`": \`;':,\• '' 1,, ?',,\\ i 'I illik_...,.. (1/il1,1/41/1-. ..c1,,31.‘\II\%)",})1.1/(1...k.'-: \:.:::r;:,•:?:::::,-,..,:: , ...:'\::::•., 1 :•-soir''te------4,..11!°`-' tIN.:1\ .1 -.1.` 1,7?''' 111'11t1''' ':‘..'1\ \ \ ,1 .41,11:?lilt Qi4 ;:1/1" ' tril)1,t)'''' 4-ef 4,:--•:.:'::::‘,•-,:-... `X6.:;,..-z-.. s":,:`„‘'-,`. ' r;. 71;§ iiii *,`,\`,\1 It 1‘,\t\s --,---1r)/1)1 ‘,.)‘.\,4.--::1'11-::; Piii,./,7 III:1j\ -'''.:-.'‘.1';),5-1.,;,,a,"%,t1,1?:•_......................... • : .i•\I'';,,,,A?1•1>,1,14,, f(,)), \\,, i y). ),91'1",1-)-r...;.)31:., /ill I?0 1,,1 ; t(i-:" 3",(10,,:,;(:-:7,.-i,i",',,----. .-:::._- _-_34.5..z,5g;•:•,,„ •' •-... 1', ;;";7 ,,. ii:Aill t)CNN\\ I `..?_dit%---1./1,.---5;:iii5-,„'. '):1-_,,,(;1•11 ,, :;./ , ,---figri-,---;;I'li--:,--,!--,'-gr;;;:--_--i--_--_,_-:-;-:::.-z..-4,34 .;,. .: . , ,... ...,:s f' 2/1,/,t);';/(•-,:2%.4,--•••: _7.eCh --41:6',!•";7' i /1:1,:::: -.:?,,,z;,•-•Ig:1/7--- --,-ii.if•W;•Wi,.. .,/ /IP.,-;;;;---....-...4't— „,le,,,1; -.1.c°,1,1 ''..-",----/)C1,,4:5:2•://:-..;1-'-.4X-:-.•:::::::::-,......7. 41:1:1t )*: i '•• ' ' 11 --- in.::-.:eks1,),‘1\1, 1, •-• 1 4,,,,,i,:it\.,c,...„4,-,i)\& , ill n,n,1 .:J6.-;--:K,,,,,„,firi--F:;LQ.:,si-g-:_,,,-,-pze:t-g-T-47.,:,,4:‘:,)11,1,1k:.,.:*:i.:1,1 „fi:ee ,:t. \*,1., I n. , :„,,,41,,,:y / 1.,,....ra tt\:%,,t /-., 1,---2,,,..t,v-,-,----,.74;,-21.44-- -,•:-:- :1,Ilr.:::•,1 1\\ 1:7.4fIC:PII:s5ffS'A?1:P;'•ti 1 )).:11,1e ,---. . ,;,:". .F-1!:14t4kg:"'.!;5fili-i.,.--. : ,V,Y-4,:•,,kc'J \ ;`,"<'1,--"'s':'"ife'''/ Itill,i&i' : *------7,1 -'-fz"iti:1,-,:.%•ir,:),?•:;,,, , g}iSII:\\\ ''Al•.i.I \)% ,,'1'2:LL4+---- / 1/Willi I 11411‘%tIt2i 1'0 t,' Vii 1J- X:."-%;":;, %; ,--",*%:%,;"•%:-4:4"4/hrfli-kst .X';'A ,,,,/,1,1,1))11,cl,./)1) i ,--1--4,1.(MI,1 ?. \=:\IiL4iy1 1 i..Qg,-'.•:::--i).-•:1-12;%:?:::',-',"-::%:,:"AtA= %,'IY,;-.(-->5`.-7/4-71-l',:f4.;/,'-'1'% \ 1 k • . ;• ..\ li' 114/111/110/1 ' '' I 1 1 i141/il'i sa\V NV% :;/,;7(1"\‘`,1,(%frvi:://lit'llit/IZ.%/4"4.*Iff%;-:::---;(•11'.(e(1ilittrif4,... 1 • 1 ,::.,,;,/,,/, ,: . , ,r„ 1 1,141 t 4.,,,,-7,-,t tt Itt I, ,..-/t4,1 fr,--,..",4tlg 'irp:7,-140:-:xi'\tlia"i:iirf,tgu:•:-,h,w'i 1 I : \1 •:- .y.,;1411,,•4,,/ji:r,,.;') 1 t - • Vliz: AzArA, .i„,P,/i :' ',., i rili)'1 is-1 .;•ii iiii it 1 1 i ----.3'VI 1,7/41,1114:44:40.-Wik:".„-;NI4Sluillsitf 1?4,,,;-.-..i.):) 1,11- it:tlii fi 1 1,, f---,,i1.,?://i(61, ,111117,40;tt,J':-','*qi41114Viffili I l, A . • 1,1 Miglim ill :, /-::,--- ,t'il,,,'"/ lilll11,14ggie,M \ I'‘;,44:,•:..:tiff-.,,Rol41 / 4,,Irr,,J37,-;7=!..iititA1884'il.14#1,pPi:,24,,t,Pitifiiii/ifi''((:.1,-,,,..4E,:--,'" .1......!,;:ckvigp7;:-:.'?•----.11,-,:-..--"-,../ifili::-;"ii:14,7,,foliiiiii.1,/,0,141,Titfortiffiiii,i,iii.y.t-1,1,1..,,..-,:fro . m,. ‘,„,,,,,,, , .;,......,.....,,..„.....,,,\\, .,..„ „„/„11.. 5,,,....,....3„, _ rt 4.0,.......,,.„„.„,•;,„:,,,,,,,,I.14.6wil:uott...(•::::, .4"L ad)-7:--- 's .\''1'1.''' ---1;'=":,/.'-'",-;-:-.:1"-, ;" )1 ;,-,,11/110,://,,,o/kippAl )iiii/r;7:•-fillff i ,..-., k: k`..\\,•,. '..:::,.-.:-.='!;-•zi,<)1,/ ',-,, i i ' vi,:;',./p4,1,•:::://141§;',16, ,',4,,P#4, fifiiiiiifi:\r.:,„,..<•„..;----- ,..,..::,),T:--1 0,,.A),11 li I i c f,X.., '1'.,&...,':::::i' \ 112,=-'31 ,,/ , 6,'- YilfilkillgtViAL1-0(ilitilliiIVVI--":•;;;:::::---:-:,'-',11 :-- :7,-- • 4•4=',./,-• ....‘,‘ . \--'1---',--' • f20 ' fi 1"1,'"1Vilim:),910AY-.3.0.:).44,;%k‘ ..:i,;,-.•.i .•.,.; ,..•',. .\\A.-.....,,-,... (/ ., , );p.u...-.., :!f-- ,;4-4;1, ,-)if. ,,Vil, ,......./• \,.1\\\."---:-/- .1-'0: grauso"j*,,,. ,..., I 4:11,7(..'i ,i i 111(11 . a. ,,•-•._„„„,•-"•4• ‘.... 1.:; ;!...,%..'-----'e -41 t.2......."--'•:-'":" ...---.....,••1...5--4---trA-:-'''.i471— • . -,(4- - • I 1-4, /1/I 1 /II: 1 `4061 '`-\\•\ —\----"-"\4----,4- • ,s'ilt il r ' ir,v>-,7 .'"? 'c, 1, • -:-- °°.,.. --r....,:covR!.'0 vscra.Aniii.y...- ,..=- _ •• rztrice,,„%iogia • ). 't 1..!•,.‘ fit c' 1,1 . -0?... 4'1': *1)))1 1 i( I'l.."---= 1„,,..,- --1-.7...%t•' :---r." ,. ..*: '010X'Aini$X , ___,..tr..,,,;.-- • ‘,111;141,4va ._.4.'v.•-• s„. ,.-c,ii:f.-\. =1"--I )S•C'1.:1) 3..........,, --, , . • • toEso ,...: ,-----;_ , o......_,,,,s 0..„?....i.„ -;.—.........,,,,..n. To-stiN • IA Ta-uitslcE INAGE ' --------,u2-7-:n tosT''sT°g"`stwut .,„„c‘,,.v.. sou i.„,..sG DEA •• • • ................. .E.xisT).„ ...„„Ac,..„..... WI''..'1"1."'"•'t1,.UK;x0.3.."3.".4 TITCuss OW. • , . • • • % REcT°Ec °9 1996 • . • lc-2g . • • ; r1: ; 1 ; ' I ; I PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA MAP '' I;1ira.'I"'wia I,,: 1 for • 'Ni i 'X1:1 i" 2741 I (1 al i • va)4, '; i" ; 1\11" Proposed' 'Non-Residential P.U.D. District , �''° �*I,rt5 1„ \` Sou thlake, Tarrant County, Texas ""K'''= �'' `'' October 14, 1996 ' i r r4v.ea,�+ '\ -`\`,•,,;:1','ii\;'`: \{ - 1 ' , \ -i, +, �.;,-r e. ` x. LEGEND • - . IfII ;((.'::')cif'-r,/ ,.bi fgg I.T,.I.I( . ) t Ai �-DRAINAGE AREA NUMBER . Il..,p HAAII,L ate' '�';l:i"::( 1 , 4 art m;I,,a I„LN. a'I. �— l1)) ,\\I4 il,i.ili...\ F` ti"` f AREA IN ACRES L .',�iii. ''S-i ,,,'' t. I.."If.5 s,O M.R SM"IIC L /%:/ i. \ ,,,,, `�; —,o .:". MA.1Dp DRAINAGE BASM DIVIDE AR.; I P. \ M' I V; -- ' 1 M 1;lib^.1I.' DC,NOARV `, '• `•:?, . rM:a ., • - suoo•scN DIVIDE '1 , r '''+"'',' •+ / • . i`\ M.. rw FLOM DIRECTION ARADMG • lii ] a-:`,. �••M'a'-,• `, l .,.r! /f \ \ ,1 `''i• •' / '\ •\ . • __�?{•___ EXIST.SIDRM SEWER 'r '�i�p 7' h..',\i;(, ` `�); ;'/� , +/ ?`. `--,- EXtsr.sronM SEWEa -'•di1�'� A`: SbC;;i tM�'Y 5n i Y . -) > ry 3 � '/ - .,' • I ` q 'S C :--:r .s. I`'-,t'i w ;,,1 i � , 1�o ) -a �► : I i 1 �'' .. - c '1'" —^-r • yi�Y' r: 4 " ;, . /-fi.\,::Aa_.. .\,: I ' .,it / ,Ir.; " .yam / . ^' t /� �';f \ '? ' i _ - ,fr7 '' I'r7.:, 1 f . �/ .,',ir•r-- S' ` 'I <�►a•( �, r' �1•`/lc d u\o„ •:ri",:•i'lli:.)i 1„';' r• ) 1 \ • - /:i i..'';'. '''•-.&_-!";',"" . )4)41:r•-‘ V-2-. ,427 07• ---:::: ----- Aths4i- ---:•,•-! .f/ _ �i 1i ice`' : ♦ `.\M �,"I '�I i '/Y/ �('';%a'�'Z'`, `,� v�'!��Qc', f�! 2�'+�% DA .; _f4\.�i • it. 11/,',I.1„,2'i.%;7"11///61 )44/bpi rr,lc ,„,..165)„.,4;ill,• r,lt, i ft,,•,, _.;,'..`.0,,A-t 1 ,t;;;;,;"! ,•;-*;;7„.:.:4•.. .....-.--.1,-,,,, ,r,),;Y;\ • . .: __ 1 r iNs-t--.,..I.R=.4;41_.1 :-. \s,1,)'11.i0,2',/,,L,\k?'44/kilt 's.:1S..---';;;,'k-W:'eh' .q:y%25 ;?/:•=?W5 -•.4e 'illit'llti:1 1 ,,.,0 )�.'):., �; ; t;NI; l QA ' ' / 4ca,/: %'�0';% /: vie AV1171/ 1:,f114'111c 1,1. .:::. )`,\;, 1 1,1� '," I`. ,i; _. ��Si';%J ,�1:' r;/, ;�;;T••'11;"�);, y'�r 'c'`".'0_-5, .t, Y,,n,...r.-- �lle�i�e ti:Lis, �•��►g;~,��x-"T'.--�. ;' ' 'Ai %el r :it-'6l,.._ Lwvw���nAi�1V_N!W':2'�j1V- i71-' `MYAvu rnnrmw,,,ssuro�w,aiW.- '4•••;j'\ ,q':� ;:' • / `.cam ''' 7: r' (ir'% r7,';i 1 f! 1'!c, 1.1 is. ,-;-....R� �',-. '® ' :,01 %;;''11Iss;1;';;,,,. '1, ''^+;:: L4i11 - ' 1;`-1' -'—-• r-cei"YC�'— it`1.,.1 ---n 1,'y" AWN/;:/;1 �, :*.,�„•_ may. ' , il. ' �.' '-�'\'� �---�- Fla.. ;I ,.;%s'�, �I,�"''�;/� /:!;;; rr,' 'lit :;� i, i I: I t ;1 i ,4• M, : 1;';;''--�� �,l i s --; , , • {{ ' (y iic�yy,,,� z .. > I_ "1 .T Y it `?°'M` .!CGCi�ia'.' - I I f iir f'!:r` :;,I.)'y \� )j 1 R = i-4_A,�-= .. ..t.ys 1,,,...' 'Tv, _ �-- -x3r 3. �°'C_.:'-c_�c ..„,%1 Q. �l ,i-r'+-In _ .ra,.,n,111'ri, r..•7 A '`----- �2=-.<s----": •i-eie., 5; 2., I. ,'yj N 1 - `.. a.Is nX _. t 31::7 rK==�"+•z .,,--._-�- •Oe,:u�-vs•• a�a.0 o. ' • TWO, CS II*non ..1x va • OUNNOT ,It? , , .A.u.At AAiA I T a ..4 .. , 1 ()MIu4 u.A 1 1 Int.*, IWO! E. MI ,IF+R Ft IMAf11 C Fly IrMnw 7 !IM b Fs: F M, Rv.n I�H V I... NPfR M,, II+M RIH .a—.-:- .1 , - -• ,.w a.a � 1... '�a :�M '... ! `..' l,.,i+ ) :. „ ..>. a tl.H •.:�1,7i,.r' a. n a., 1 .as .pp i:.. .,v1L a :::. ':,aTil�:ia:?'.'Oc'Ii r,�• 1;a1 :.; iI iy "IT A: 'imp ':.: 1:.1: +,�t.'r zi.`'-Ii;•. ti' •A -i. i:: xo r-a A. - 'I: • I.r D ;e; eo.p- 1.' t:IT .... .' ... .�:0 1. 1 i•�e.) ,,,;I �) y rp i:i �y p s r!•.y.,, -yes, Hi i ,; ;.1 .C _i _01 a t N 1 l IRS, n nI .' ,.b :t Ail I.M �' :•.:-Xl9w-1 j iJ' •a w -i , • o Ia i ni .6 a fidrr,"np I I i ::'r. 4 •.,1:1 t .6.• ..._ AAC1DIft1, Mari''''/'RLErt'T' LNtrR4I"' SOUTHLAKE TOWN CENTER A"'xA"" uMt.CSW a,alr,X1'. MX+MAIc umai anrlXrlml.uIe RIALTO DEVELOPMENT EE OM OTORI@ cr.uN SST DC "IMMC VS.GD'I° "X°""�°"" `�RflA ' PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA MAP i s. uM.ass ATTFurn MINIS cnrnusr • . I • • 7C-29 REC'D DEC 0 91996 • MAJOR UTILITY PLAN 4 • "for ' Proposed Non—Residential •P:U.D.. District . S . Southlake,. Tarrant County,.. Texas • • October 14,. •1996 • .i N . • C• ITY limes V..NM..1.RM1f 1.1.C. • HALL �. • or WvICE,..uKp.s..•w].x. ,.. 11.C].m TAtt.K 33.0113t 1.1G110.4103 •• '.( Iq.Y1W.F1101•CS.M..C]..R • 1. `4/I / ' P.U.O. .r¢..ne... 1F Or.....MOM. • OUNOARY / . • i I . :,/ N." • • Nif%tr's, ••.. . 46.11/41 • . \.i/i / "1„..... AS, *V- /14 • , ,��;. r/ ',1 .Y BOUNDARY • • ; `' i . P.U.O. \ /. /• + / • { al/ BOUNDARY \\ r 1 /� 1 • //I ''' • ' .1----71' :i • / .,.// . J • I i . __ .E., ., _.....,. t 1 11�.1U`I i i — c..m ACCESS cs.,r• • t N•r:R�i�d�vu_ M ,rr.^�:Vx�- C..p.OK.]..a - — ---" •—r+�.�r_, P.U.O. BOUNDARY iN - e__ • _ .. __ _ _ � � _ - F`-'� ••-r T'CT --•y WI JT*UR Rfl PA{}p�..--... Tr : .. .. ..._ �! .J.. _ -_ - _ - __ ._- •-:-..--:--- u7'i r 0e0 1, fl`'t ;°it • • V?e, Ge ,e?rr a!nid '• ,VICINITY IUP , ''°'''' "'"'''""'/"I'M''`'CMCM WI. SOUTHLAKE TOWN ' CENTER RIALTO DEVEL�MENT• ED W..ICAPP a.ott1Pc. PUMP.JaCW..pflG3fCP.MC •am C.CNtpt C1CLLY afmCaf4..0 r Mp '""`�`°"� "MVP A e 'n"°°"�" MAJOR UTILITY PLAN W u,m urt armrxm JC1[01f r••^+]R] • S .. .. . • 7C-30 RECD DEC 0 91996 .1 .. SCREENING AND LANDSCAPE PLAN for Proposed Non—Residential P.U.D. District Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas October 14,1996 I aty Hall 1 Ili �i • I s' d,B c-_ -)[ I___. Common District Edge at 114 Open Space \ ` <nr�. .l • sum:.. � \ at as necessary It 1 ` • Bloat NA / ! -hite/N3/-br/!et- / ! j; Common __ ! > Open Space ! / J ;. ! J as necessary 1 / I1i ! II `�� kbeR NB � as eemlg Jj,1 rN:cessaryi O I I Bloch D.t/fl Block car, Block COMB • i / Interior Street t / / /;/% District Edge at / / . Carroll Ave. e.,.. • ..Air; { I A IAA Aw N1tl 1 14*}J 11, i F... ` �n Town Square Cool CA Bweh ea i ' Streetscape J 1 i / i District Edge at 1 y Adjacent C3 -- .r 1 EMI J • • ink•'. SVtet IL I, in--_� f.h ruse I .loci Common N- • II • Open Ball A1/al Space In... Orr AAA` Or A• i I Woe A Al/CB t To.I7'Iq B,G I' District Edge at Common Wm Area #I U {' Carron Ave. Open Common \ {1 IsoIa.rlwI i re I Open Space 1 E ll { I 1 Bloch A, . ' I—: • District Edge at 1709 East Southiake Blvd.(FM 1709) District Edge at 1709 —7 r I.Ar lwwWr__.-- ______ Ia M.wO l 1 MUM ME r 3y fit,i--LOCATION jgry IretVG:. S _ VICINITY MAP .R�rE� °�"°µ�"'R'A"""""""`m°�'"` SOUTHLAKE TOWN CENTER RIALTO` DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE ADA lTEGE NOYNAN,JACKS=r*JHAI IUN,INC. am a mcwm GRAHAM ASSOCIATES.INC. TRAITIC MINE= BARTON-ASQIMAN AS MATS INC ittaT NR LAND USE AT/ORNEY, JQl4NS k"GILCHRIST SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING PLAN s 7C-31 REC'D,DEC 0 91996 • • CONCEPT • PLAN - for Proposed Non-Residential P.U.D. District • S Sol uthlake. Tarrant County, Texas October 14, 1996 P°°NN \iAJ • L- SURVEY A-695 IXED USE - y • RICH RD EADS - WILD V000 LANE I O PC0 �lr>.q • AG ANI EY A-.91 ' .. l P�J rF MIXED USE 561. 0 1--------[......._ PCP ,A yyf- 55`- ,. MIXED �r ..r q — • �p0 — - USE 9/' j�AG• ` suR•EY :; '= CITY CS O ® � :, , i 1E. 1 MALL/ wNww.w. "_ - --' alt. Xi C•7/ -= 1 / '" / N MIXED ® � N v1 O q NN, USE �O to �,. <?,, �� AG • SR 1,tb.wl '�' `" ❑' e: , ' �, MIXED • `a,..^.s.aot.to .. .._.. `.. USE �, ® `L EWES y d C3 �� Nf., 1 T r. >° MIXED -'' \- �q ,e ° USE t` r y,: �_.1��I p\� • . — k�' � o �� .. �� ww „ I •• '•j • VILL3 t 'j' •�\ i I PHISn Ac sosns OI-n.fl �� ....LIXUSE 'a-.,,';j ' i�i® ru.♦a ASq Ac O � _. _ XED -- ..n.• r > //� ,.,.p . A�� _ I iSv l _ I r I$- - •w.lw.., ,►�. o • , ** Lnts�• .� U_i d i''�__l-_.._...., ` IF.N.LQ91 t..—IL •\ �.1. - N. I-__ !W sig. .+nm Iw,n I.--.=” - Y.......•...4---- - �W- w x >. Q 1 l I Y .R.6N' a •' >., AG SAG © 1.�,p 0000 O f_rC,,O O Oq ❑ '� - +^" s.ssaOwrIUN ITT ` NEOILM SP2 • OQ16V�� =^ `A60P67A-C2 �� — ,K �K OENSITV G i`<,": .1 01� ,,,< RESIDENTIAL i�51OENT[lt ma's O 1 • .mu,>,oN , • APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN C _-� 2 It SOUTHLAKE COMMONS MIXED USE ,,,SP2 T1 __- ,S sec,/ COMM,A0 I11,RI 17 J, .1 I • •,•<I I...fwl.ar/ o-41 �: M I.LEGEND ... 1. ••.-.B I • wiw" ' °.a p.b ru:.,,t•r d owwll•M..,U • ..t, a. �; v: MIXED USE m • i... Ilan 1» �' ii..cc00��(( sulia.rl.t _ wl.,. . ,t,•...I c n `ts vw.:I., ."Ai e..ln`.�Ia:1y .....•......„ .. . :•<.N. • .jYn . Yta.Ip I^Yr1•f t.rtwl "^'r'r • pN w n :1� �pp[� 1,'�IT..,si ' yy�,���'AI,I A,M1I w,llpt ,..: .0: '•5 V..rtAew Zai r`Jek''µj i • SNwC . .ww In xi foot.(����Cor,i14 NIKKI.AKA Or O.O AGES •mi .4:ty •...ke I/ .•w. .t 12].• 1%• G u'.. Lo•l IK OKN s9CCS KwIKe , •.rn�. tncw.b yy."yyy s nxap oaA.N Irmlo. OM at. .. w sOili Nw61 Pula Ael.. COMM OPEN SPACE � 1.��I®.,I �M 4u. l .,IR L....o. - R c , ...x// . no wmlze to.zt Arncs - T'7 �2 p ;C e'° ^ ?..<.r , - - a. r .wyi•IN. N• ' Lat ,00.-,Na,•tau LOI 1, a >I V.O.L.44K4o1..CO Il,sa .n ii R�:. .M.,I., mrtllA2 60i-•0fillL41E nil �.,-:.I::rtO �??a- .4.10.01 IA Coo., YI• .q♦ K KCCKI.[b.onl.E '15116: i:dul_'Ir.: n.c.-w.l...c.,.... I. r++ .w veto.<.. aLK•Nuan ENnt�.U.O.. . ,bt u7 ��.$�iCTe'n:. n VwN..I,.w.,�1 r m w vt u wlNo•Uj nw LL1.Ool UE,G�E•1 �� ir�,L.IELh{;b,■ we►. • VICINITY MAP W m '2A5.;; "` SOUTHLAKE TOWN CENTER RIALTO DEVELOPMENT• n.6 O D.<a® '•Ma_.�NNAN•noaY¢°` CONCEPT PLAN . ! , � ~ ,AN ux•Trvulm Nxlm•Mama • • I . 0' .• I . • • 7C-32 RECD DEC 0 91996 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-224 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 109.33 ACRES SITUATED IN THE RICHARD EADS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 481, TRACTS 2A AND 3A AND A PORTION OF TRACT 3, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM"C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "NR-PUD" NON- RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING • THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A ' SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "C-3" General Commercial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and S WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 1 z2 4110 changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those S who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large,the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City Sof Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD la Su Page 2 f • Being a 109.33 acre tract of land situated in the Richard Eads Survey,Abstract No. 481, Tracts 2A and 3A and a portion of Tract 3, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein,from"C-3"General Commercial District to "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Theuse%if the above proerty shall faille-ilk-gabjeCtT011:167COlfditions_restrictions arid limitations set forth in::the;Development Standafds contauied m Exhibit"B" Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both 0 • present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances 1 except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys,omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall Sbe fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. • All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 3 -ie.' _ • and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1996. III MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: S CITY SECRETARY L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD �7/�—2f Page 4 (l. J�p • EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD 3 ) Page 5 1 EXHIBIT "A" • I) BEGINNING at a found 5/8 inch iron rod in the south right-of-way line of State Highway 114 1 (Northwest Parkway) (a 200 foot R.O.W.), said point being the southeast corner of a tract of land, I conveyed to Greenway-Carroll Road Partners, recorded in Volume 11445, Page 1627, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said point also being the most northerly, northeast corner of Fechtel tract; THENCE South 47°56'15" East, along said south right-of-way line, a distance of 171.70 feet to a Texas Highway Department monument found for corner, said point being the point of curvature of a curve to the left, having a delta of 17°26'51", a radius of 5,839.58 feet and a chord bearing and distance of South 56°39'41" East, 1,771.38 feet; • THENCE southeasterly, continuing along said south right-of-way line and along the arc of said curve to the left, a distance of 1,778.25 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with cap found for corner said point being the northeast corner of said Peterka tract and the northwest corner of a twenty foot strip of land, conveyed to Diamond Shamrock Corp., recorded in Volume 6812, Page 2108, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00°01'16" East, leaving said south right-of-way line and along the east line of said Peterka tract and the west line of said Diamond Shamrock tract, a distance of 1,517.13 feet to a 1/2 o inch iron rod with cap found for corner in the north right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) (a 130 foot R.O.W.), said point also being the southeast corner of said Peterka tract and the southwest corner of said Diamond Shamrock tract; - THENCE North 89°39'55" West, along said north right-of-way line, a distance of 820.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with cap found for corner; THENCE North 88°55'18" West, continuing along said north right-of-way line, a distance of 505.52 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner, said point being the southwest corner of said Peterka tract and the southeast corner of said Fechtel tract; THENCE North 88°54'16"West, continuing along said north right-of-way line, a.distance of 1,261.13 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found;for corner, said point being the southwest corner of said Fechtel tract, said point also being the intersection of the north right-of-way line of said Southlake Boulevard and the east right-of-way line of North Carroll Avenue (a variable width R.O.W.); - THENCE North 00°11'06"West, along said east right-of-way line, a distance of 987.22 feet to a point for corner; III L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 6 1 C '' y S THENCE North 89°58'44" Fast, leaving said east line, a distance of 529.87 feet to a point for corner; i THENCE North 00°11'0T' West, a distance of 170.36 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 29°48'53" East, a distance of 120.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 14°48'53" East, a distance of 968.51 feet to a point for corner; , THENCE North 60°11'07" West, a distance of 71.90 feet to a point for corner; • THENCE North 89°11'23" West, a distance of 420.30 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron rod at the southeast corner of the Richards Eads No. 481 Addition, recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 585, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; •iENCE North 00°03'41" East, a distance of 326.45 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner in 1 e south line of said Greenway tract, said point being the northeast corner of said 481 Addition and the most northerly, northwest corner of said Fechtel tract; • THENCE South 89°53'32" East, a distance of 630.23 feet to a point located in the said south right-of- way line of State Highway 114 and the POINT OF BEGINNING and •CONTAINING 4,762,401 square feet or 109.330 acres of land more or less. • S L:\CT YDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224_PUD �C—S�j Page 7 / I •' _ EXHIBIT "B" _ • CONCEPT � PLAN•.----.-" - •.--"�-�--- .—...: for Proposed Non—Residential P.U.D. District S Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas - October 14. 1996 Ni 03• O \ " RICH4RDa3EADS " , ' AG n ' T' MIXED USE / FOP 1. sy} � . b — / __ C3 do ,� ' . MIXED >.r �j(, 1lio* !1 USEV. / AG 'CITYS 'O :::Iri: • MIXE '— USE• �- ..... � ,�0 USEw'd ;� Of > MIXED �'d''.•.' \ •--1? •'''' '4.-. l%%S. �tB O �. /'(��y� '© USE /cif .—_*4Al,i °,,._ - Swat II 4, .VILLAGE CENTER a.:;' .s (12 ;O I I1 �w,8S:.. 41 PHASE 2 a I•C yy 1oa _. H 'i•r1 III W.l MOE m•!i»r ___ ( XED (7. �SE IAAl « 6ce:ci . " .. FIXEO USE N3 ,. � • . 0 I �AGo "/I r �1 ' I I "' � I� m: rr.t. ¢09, . . . _ ^ US 3C 313 1 \ . 3.50.e HEDIUH WORM SP2 • "�•(1 ••+. ' "O C.2 " `\C 1 - 1« K oENGITr OE,6ITr GOP i.=_ al•= O 1\\\ — RESIOE1tTIsl 30.s K 01 �laa.430111W-� 1.1 TI. RESIOENTI4 I APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN C I 301 is K /I SOUTIaAKE CONNO'S MIXED USE 4611 0-267 • I 1 -- • 11 «.!.«: .<>_. rr rim 1.R:.:`�11 '•• , ' 3. �. MIXED USE • • . ' «• iZII_CQL'lrrlClr� •- - ��.s e'er.. a rk a r.n a_-ssnfc� i..,......r.yt. 1 « Jiii! �a> ..CA -Tlc�c� .... •.......... ct ` Ha. 1! i1 ttCRfi1L•GIC� 14 1:723.1.3 ,• i.s.i ryi�y NL,I Il.li•f Na• - •�a. 'Lr4u rr117 ! -1,'✓'t•Z1131 Iri�� 1# ...lt 1 a.., M1Llr-4.17 GOC� w14«M AKA Or . ,7/8-.1•'i••.v- ((K•sa 13110 1«l ?T•ZC7_t•�CiCt- 041sR Km,. 5.1 lad ' .«11..�1oa",� ;?!•^_IIIJCL^R�C•1�.' ` '..�I�1. -• '••.ia. 66.�s'fffftt 1va.o,M.0Kt •'""'.- yin)JuldN. 2�_T.ICSSI:GICt ISM agts 1 v`.,.! 1 . - ./ - Sa.TrC,•1,-I i.-cam llgacl0 ..r•'.1;./a:•ct•+ «'' :0.13,.,?r 1+..• - USNI=I n,RS SNO wi IOOi.1.01«OWL lIi �-.�I".�`; 1.. �: • #•trL aw'�f�,r.away..,,CO L1+* ra rz1•�.'1 L._7nCo � m.cMO[ tn.rcWWrc MI IT'l'ti{�Ri:i3_i.:, w.aa 1•....rat[.a. sr. aa� MK 11.O.0. r6d •(_;nr v«. a.« c,o. . >omorG or u•a a..(gz...,la I N� 'T•�CCII2711= ' +�wn 114 r.1`•r7nsD r a«. a . i.i.a.c ..4. .a Fa_ [ asc " 4u0•nS ro S VICINITY MAP Lolvir.an" �;;� SOUTHLAKE TOWN CENTER RIALTO DEVELOPMENT' >tir""`r"�„"'"-.,mt�..oaa,a.� CONCEPT PLAN -i" IW fa 41•31 iT. amo.T•nt snt • • • • • Si . • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD, 1 RECD DEC 0 91996 Page 8 --)C--Ct V ' EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS sIn this P.U.D.,the following development regulations and standards shall be applicable and shall control to the extent of any conflict with other development regulations in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. 1.0 Use Regulations _ a. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses shall be in accordance with the C-3 Zoning District except as otherwise provided below. b. Non-Permitted Uses: The following uses shall not be permitted: . Filling stations or service stations, operating with or without a convenience store. Such use may offer gasoline, oil,greasing and accessories, and may contain a small car wash facility, but may not include fender or body repairs, mechanical services,rear-end, transmission or engine overhaul. Frozen food lockers for individual or family use,not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping. IIISecually oriented businesses. c. Uses Permitted by Specific Use Permit Only • The following uses shall not be permitted without a Specific Use Permit approved in accordance with Section 45 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance("Specific Use Permit"): Sale of previously owned retail goods. Electrical and gas repair and installation services, except where such services are provided incidental to the retail sale of electrical and gas appliances and supplies. Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities. Medical care facilities requiring or allowing an overnight stay, to include hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal pudx4a.wpd. I EC D D E C 2119.97 Development Requirements • December 20, (996 ' la (4 1 \ L:\CTYDOCS\O RD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 9 • service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for IIIthe convenience of patients, staff and visitors. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers. Plumbing and heating appliance repair and installation services, except where such services are provided incidental to the retail sale of plumbing and heating appliances and supplies. All storage of materials must be indoors within this zoning district. d. Outdoor Displays and Sales-The following outdoor displays and sales shall be permitted: 1. Outdoor temporary removable displays and sales for fairs, festivals and other special events held in outdoor spaces by Specific Use Permit. 2. Outdoor vendor sales (with accessory display and storage) in-temporary or movable structures, including but not limited to sales of seasonal merchandise, fruit and vegetable market sales, sales of arts and crafts items, sales of specialty food items, and sales of a similar nature, subject to prior approval as to any such use by S.U.P. Locations for outdoor • vendor sales shall be approved as part of development plan or site plan review, as determined by the City Council. Sales exceeding three days per 111 week shall require a Specific Use Permit. 3. Sales from kiosks at locations approved as part of an approved • development,plan, subject to prior approval as to any such use by Special Use Permit. ' 2.0 Accessory Uses -Permitted accessory uses shall be in accordance with the C-3 district. In addition,the following accessory uses shall be permitted: outdoor dining and seating areas street furniture,urban design fixtures and streetscape components 3.0 Development Regulations -In this P.U.D., the following development regulations shall be applicable: a. Building Height: Subject to the exceptions listed below, no building shall exceed three(3) stories,nor shall it exceed fifty-two (52) feet in height. The following • reference datum shall be used for measuring the height of a stepped or terraced building: the elevation of the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground surface within pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements • December 20, 1996 C"1 " L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 10 a 5-foot horizontal distance of the exterior wall at the front of the building (abutting the public street) when such sidewalk or ground surface is not more than • 10' above the lowest grade for any stepped or terraced segment of the building. For buildings where the grade within a 5-foot horizontal distance of the exterior wall varies by more than 10 feet as measured vertically along the building elevations fronting onto public right-of-ways,the reference datum shall be the - highest adjoining sidewalk or adjoining sidewalk along said right-of-way(s). 1. In the event a Building for a City Hall facility is located on the block bounded by Street 3, Street D, Street 4 and Street C, such building may be built to four(4) stories or sixty-five(65) feet in height; 2. no maximum number of stories shall be applied to parking structures; provided, however, in no event shall parking structures exceed forty-two (42) feet in height as measured from the ground elevation;provided, however parking structures shall be permitted to a height not to exceed fifty(50) feet by Specific Use Permit; .- 3. architectural embellishments not intended for human occupancy that are integral to the architectural style of the building, including spires,belfries, towers, cupolas, domes, and roof forms whose area in plan is no greater than 25% of the first story plan area may exceed the height limits of this section by up to 50%, and shall be exempt from the maximum elevation ill . limitation of Section 43.9.c.1(g)i. of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; 4. Penthouses over elevator shafts,ventilator shafts, antennas, chimneys, smokestacks,fire sprinkler tanks, or other mechanical equipment may extend up to twenty(20) feet above the permitted building height, and provided the same shall be subject to approval at approval of the applicable Site Plan unless setback from all exterior walls a distance at least equal to the vertical dimension that such item(s) extend(s) above the actual building height; and 5. A penthouse used for housing mechanical equipment, a stairway, or elevator equipment may extend above the actual building height but may not exceed it by more than 20 feet. The exterior walls of all penthouses exceeding the permitted building height shall be set back from all exterior walls a distance at least equal to the vertical dimension that the penthouse extends above the actual building height; provided, however,penthouses not exceeding the permitted building height shall be subject to approval at approval of the applicable site plan unless such setback(s) are provided. pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements S December 20, 1996 T 4-(3 ' L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 11 b. Front, Side and Rear Yards: With the following exceptions,no front, side or rear yard is required: 11) 1. Buildings along Highway 1709 and the east right-of-way of North Carroll Avenue shall maintain a minimum thirty(30) foot setback. In the event the North Carroll Avenue right-of-way has not been established at the time of development plan or site plan review,the setback shall be maintained from the projected east right-of-way of North Carroll Avenue based on information available at the time from the City of Southlake. • 2. Buildings along State Highway 114 shall maintain a setback of fifty(50) feet from the projected future right-of-way of State Highway 114; provided,however, in the event such right-of-way has not been established at the time of development plan or site plan review, the setback shall be maintained from the projected right-of-way of State Highway 114 based on information available at the time from the Texas Department of Transportation. 3. As to all other P.U.D.boundaries,no building shall be located closer than fifteen(15) feet from the boundary of the P.U.D. c. Maximum Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage for individual lots is 100%. However,the maximum aggregate lot coverage for all buildings as a S percentage of the PUD as a whole(including the area of dedicated public streets, private drives and common open space) shall not exceed fifty-five percent(55%). d. Building Envelopes:Where`Building Envelopes" are indicated on the Concept Plan,no building(excluding parking structures) shall be constructed, iti whole or in part, outside of any Building Envelope as shown. e. Common Open Space: Common Open Space as designated on the Concept Plan shall be provided for public use. No building or other structure shall be constructed on any Common Open Space without the prior approval of City Council, except as follows: a bandshell pavilion shall be allowed on the block bounded by F.M. 1709 to the south, Street"5" to the north, Street"C"to the east and Street"D"to the west. f. Building Orientation: Any Building adjacent to a public right-of-way shall either ' . face such right-of-way or shall have a facade facing such right-of-way in keeping with the character of the main facade. Buildings a\separated from a public right- of-way shall not be considered to be adjacent. pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements • December 20, 1996 --r-t-fq . . L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 12 g. Building Phasing: Before construction of above-ground structured parking in blocks adjacent to North Carroll Avenue and F.M. 1709,buildings facing the 6 blocks bound by F.M. 1709, Street C, Street 4 and Street D (the"Town Square") shall first be constructed, and as to any block adjacent to F.M. 1709 and/or North Carroll Avenue,buildings adjacent to F.M. 1709 and/or North Carroll Avenue on such block will be constructed prior to the construction of above-ground structured parking on such block. h. Facade Articulation: Any combination of buildings which are located along a single block face may be treated as.a single building for purposes of applying the requirements for facade articulation set forth in Section 43.9c.1©of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. 4.0 Projections into Required Setback or into a Right-of-Way:. The following projections shall be permitted in a required setback or landscape area or in a public easement or right of way, provided that i) no projection shall be permitted into a public easement or right- of-way along F.M. 1709, North Carroll Avenue or State Highway 114, ii) such projections do not extend over the traveled portion of a roadway, iii) the property owner has assumed liability related to such projections, and iv) the property owner shall maintain such projections in a safe and non-injurious manner: a. Ordinary building projections, including but not limited to water tables, sills,belt ' courses,pilasters, and cornices may project up to twelve(12) inches beyond a Illbuilding face or architectural projection; canopies and awnings and/or kiosks may project from building face and may extend to, or be located within eight(8) inches of the curb. b. Roof eaves may project up to thirty-six(36)inches beyond the building face or architectural projection. c. Architectural Projections, including bays,towers, and oriels; show windows(1st floor only); below grade vaults and areaways; and elements of a nature similar to those listed; may project up to forty-two (42) inches into a required yard or beyond the building face. d. Below-grade footings approved in connection with building permits. 5.0 Parking: With the following exceptions, parking shall be provided pursuant to Section 35 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and such required parking shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 35 (including the shared parking provisions of 35.2): • pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements S December 20, 1996 I .7C—ors L:\CTYDOCS1ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 13 r a. On-street as well as off-street parking shall be permitted within the P.U.D. 40 b. Up to twenty-five percent(25%) of required parking may be compact spaces having a minimum space width of eight(8) feet and a minimum space length of sixteen(16) feet; provided,however, compact spaces shall not be allowed on- street and shall be limited to off-street parking locations. c. Required parking shall be located and maintained within five hundred(500) feet of the building served. On-street parking and shared parking within five hundred (500) feet of a use may be counted•toward the off-street parking requirement for that use. d. Where on-street parking is permitted,angled,as well as parallel parking shall be permitted. Both forty-five(45)degree and sixty(60)degree angled parking shall be permitted. However,no on-street parking shall be permitted within thirty(30) feet of a cross street curb line. • e. The parking requirement for office uses set forth in Sections 35.6.b(6)(a), (c) and (d) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is one(1)parking space for 330 square feet of floor area. f. The parking requirement for all retail uses set forth in Section 35.5.b(5)(a) and(e) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is one(1)parking space for 220 square III feet of floor area. g. Cumulative parking tabulations shall be submitted with each site pl;an and/or development plan. 6.0 Off-Street Loading: With the following exceptions, off-street loading shall be provided pursuant to Section 36 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance: a. The minimum dimension of loading spaces shall be as follows: 10' x 25'regular size space 10'x 50' large space b. The calculation of the minimum number of off-street loading spaces shall be in conformance with the following schedules and rules regarding shared spaces: pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements S December 20, 1996 �/7 �, r� •'1 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 14 1111 1. Number of spaces: Office Uses or portion of building devoted to office uses: - 0.-49,999 sf 0 spaces - . 50,000 - 149,999 sf 1 regular space 150,000 -249,999 sf 2 regular spaces 250,000 sf and up 3 regular spaces Retail Uses with the following Tenant size: 0 - 9,999 sf 0 spaces . - . 10,000-49,999 sf* 1 regular space • 50,000-99,999 sf* 1 regular space and - 1 large space 100,000 sf and up* 2 large spaces Restaurant Uses with the following Tenant size: 0- 9,999 sf 0 spaces 10,000 sf and up* 1 regular space III *The loading requirement for multiple tenants that are each 10,000 sf or larger may be combined within a single building and treated as a single tenant. 2. Loading spaces that are adjacent and accessible to several buildings or tenant spaces,including buildings and tenant spaces on separate lots, shall be allowed to suffice for the loading requirements for the individual buildings or tenants provided that i) the number of spaces satisfies the requirements for the combined square footages for the buildings or tenants in question, and ii) for loading spaces to be shared among separate lots,an agreement evidencing the right of tenants to the use of such spaces shall be provided. 7.0 Street Radiuses, Cross Sections, and Sight Triangles: Within the P.U.D. the following street design standards shall apply: a. Except as provided herein,no sight triangle shall be required. Adequate sight distance will be provided at all intersections through the use of appropriate traffic pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements • December 20, 1996 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 15 control devices. Sight triangles for vehicles exiting the development for both • public streets and private drives shall be provided at intersections with F.M. 1709, 40 Carroll Avenue and State Highway 114. These sight triangles shall be the triangle created by connecting a point which is ten(10) feet into the site along the right-of- way at the intersection and a point extending away from the intersection a distance of forty(40).feet along the existing roadway right-of-way line. See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for.examples of the site triangle provisions of this Section 7.0.a. b. For plantings within twenty(20) feet of any public street intersection, shrubs and groundcover shall not exceed two (2) feet in height and tree branching shall provide.seven (7) feet of clearance as measured from the-top of the ground surface to the first branch along the tree trunk. c. Street cross sections and street radiuses shall be as shown on the Concept Plan; provided,however,nothing contained herein shall vary or supercede public safety requirements of the City of Southlake as set forth in the Uniform Fire Code and other applicable laws,rules and regulations of the City of Southlake. 8.0 Screening- Screening shall be provided generally in accordance with Sections 39 and 43.9.c. of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance except screens comprised of planting materials and located within bufferyards along the boundary of the P.U.D. shall be exempt from the architectural fencing offset requirements of Section 43.9.c.1.(e). 9.0 Above Grade Structured Parking- The following exemptions shall apply to above 410 grade structured parking facilities: a. Above grade structured parking facilities shall be exempt from the accessory building limitations of Section 34.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, provided that such facilities meet the applicable requirements of these Development Regulations for principatbuildings, except for number of stories which is not limited(subject to the maximum height limitation as set forth in Section 3.0a(2) of these Development Regulations);provided,however,that the Horizontal and Vertical Articulation requirements of Section 43.9 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance shall not apply, except that, subject to the limitations set forth below,"Vertical Articulation"shall be provided at elevations visible from North Carroll Avenue between State Highway 114 and F.M. 1709, or ' F.M. 1709, and/or are visible from a tract zoned residential and/or designated as low or medium density residential on the Land Use Plan, the property line of which is within four hundred(400) feet of such parking structure. For purposes of this section, "Vertical Articulation"shall be defined as follows: pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements • December 20, 1996 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 16 Vertical Articulation: No horizontal wall shall extend for a distance greater than three(3) times the height of the wall without changing the height by a minimum of fifteen percent(15%) of the wall's height, and such height change shall continue for a minimum distance equal to at least twenty-five percent(25%) of the maximum length of either adjacent plane. In addition, any such visible elevations shall have a solid parapet wall of not less than forty-six (46) inches and shall utilize colors consistent with the surrounding principle buildings. The following exceptions to the above limitations shall apply: (i) elevations visible between gaps between buildings of fifty(50) feet or less shalLbe exempt from the Vertical Articulation requirements; and(ii) elevations which are set back behind_a building pad for a future building,which building has not yet been built as of the date the parking structure is built, shall be exempt from the Vertical Articulation requirements for a period of three(3) years until such time as the future building is built;provided,however, in the event such building has not been built within such three(3) year period, the parking structure shall thereafter be modified to comply with such Vertical Articulation requirements or in the altermative shall be screened with trees or • other appropriate planting materials until the time that such building is built. If screening is used, the method and type of screening shall be subject to the City's approval. • b. If not abutting a right-of-way, above grade structured parking facilities shall be provided with adequate access from public right-of-way(s)via private drive(s) and/or access easements. 10.0 Accessory Structures -The'following restrictions shall apply to accessory structures: a. With the exception of the following items,accessory structures shall not exceed one(1) story or a height of fourteen(14) feet. 1. flagpoles in connection with a City Hall facility located on the block . bounded by Street 3, Street D, Street 4 and Street C 2. park pavilions or bandshells 3. above grade structured parking facilities. No item listed above shall exceed fifty-two (52) feet in height or, in the case of above grade structured parking facilities, the lesser heights allowed under Section 3.0a(2) of these Development Regulations,nor shall it exceed, where applicable, pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements ill December 20, 1996 L_\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-224.PUD Page 17 • the maximum elevation limitation of Section 43.9.c.i(g)i. of the Comprehensive 40 Zoning Ordinance b. Except for open spaces and open space amenities,no accessory structure shall be located between the front lot line and the principal building on a lot. 11.0 Minimum Width of Enclosed or Partially Enclosed Open Space-In lieu of the requirements of Section 33.7 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the following definitions and requirements for minimum Court widths shall apply: a. Minimum widths shall be based on the following schedule: COURT TYPE MINIMUM WIDTH/AREA Court; Open Court 3 inches per 1 foot of building height,min. 12 feet Closed Court: min. area equal to twice the square of the width of the court based on surrounding building height,but not less than 250 sq. ft. Court Niche: no portion shall be more than 3 feet (measured horizontally) from a point where /IIthe court niche is less than three feet wide. { b. For purposes of subpart a. of this section,the following definitions shall apply: Court: An unoccupied space, open to the sky, on the same lot with a building, which is bounded on two(2)or more sides by the exterior walls of the building or by two(2) or more exterior walls, lot lines, or yards. Not a court niche. Court. closed: A court surrounded on all sides by the exterior walls of a building, or by exterior walls of a building and side or rear lot lines, or by alley lines where the alley is less than 10' in width. Court niche: Not a court. An indentation, recess, or decorative architectural treatment of the exterior wall of a building which opens onto a street, yard, alley, or court. Open Court: A court opening onto a street, yard, alley, or private drive not less than ten feet(10)wide. pudx4a.wpd. I Development Requirements December 20, 1996 0 lc- so L:\CTYDOCS\ORDWASES\480-224.PUD Page 18 Court,width of: The minimum horizontal dimension substantially parallel with the open end of an open court or the lesser horizontal dimension of a closed court; or in the case of a non-rectangular court,the diameter of the largest circle that may be inscribed in a horizontal plane within the court. 12.0 Interior Landscape Areas - The PUD does not meet the requirements of Section 3.3 of Ordinance 544, a portion of the open space shown on the approved Concept Plan substituting for Interior Landscape Areas (except as otherwise required for park dedication requirements). Specific requirements for interior landscape areas shall be determined at the time of development plan or site plan review, as determined by the City Council. Any landscaping in a surface parking lot approved in connection with development plan or site plan approval for such lot,which is taken out in connection with the later construction of a parking structure, shall be relocated or in the alternative shall be replaced with planting materials meeting the landscape requirements of this P.U.D., which replacement or relocation shall be provided elsewhere on site at the time the parking structure is built. - 13.0 Irrigation-Required landscaping shall be served by an irrigation system meeting the requirements of Section 3.6 of Ordinance 544,except in those instances and in those areas where installation of such a system is a)potentially harmful to any preserved or existing plant materials; b)not reasonably required due to the nature of the plant material (e.g. where irrigation could be detrimental to drought-tolerant plant species); or c) create a situation possibly harmful to public health, safety or welfare. Determination of the situations described above shall be made and approved by the City's Landscape Administrator. 14.0 Realignment of North Carroll Avenue-All land uses within the proposed P.U.D. shall be in accordance with allowable uses in C-3 zoning, as modified by the development regulations of this P.U.D.; provided,however, in the event any property within the P.U.D. shall become located west of the North Carroll Avenue right-of-way due to the City acquiring additional right-of-way and realigning North Carroll Avenue to the east as shown on the Concept Plan, such property to the west of North Carroll Avenue shall be used and developed only in a manner consistent with all zoning or other development standards that would apply to property that is zoned C-3 under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake. pudx4a.wpd. Development Requirements December 20, 1996 lc-c( L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-224.PUD Page 19 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT • January 3, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-146 PROJECT: Site Plan/Mesco Addition,Lot 5 STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, Ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, Ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan on property legally described as Lot 5,Block 1,Mesco Addition,and being approximately 1.190 acres situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. LOCATION: Northwest corner of State Highway 114 and Kimball Avenue OWNER: Anderson Industries, Inc. APPLICANT: Strode Property Company CURRENT ZONING: "SP-2" Generalized Site Plan District to include "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses. ND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail ii centers that serve local and regional needs) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial (same as in CS, 0-1, C-1, C-2, C-3 and B-1 districts) NO.NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: None P&Z'ACTION: November 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996.due to Resolution 95-24. November 14, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 21, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 21, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. . December 5, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table until the December 19, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. S December 19, 1996; Approved (7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 1, 1996, accepting the plan presented by the applicant to the P&Z Commission on December 19, 1996; modifying building floor area 7D-1 to 4,619 s.f.; and modifying the drive entering the car wash by increasing the • curvature. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the items addressed in Site.Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 1, 1996 with the exception of those items in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated January 3, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-146SP.WPD • S 7D-2 , - I 3A1H 3411-11 r'":".....: 6.7 2E1 2F It 'Is 1 1 1 . . L• N. 1/4-L- I ,- ..f. A.OP I • 3A1A Li' ' 3A1J2 3A1J11,.7A. - *2A2 ilk •.ct \ • x'... " *?''. - 14 i I • .- (:::: 6C gtat--- ( sfL 5 ' V• : . --. r2aA 2A3A k •it..4:• /I. I Ate N." ..:::( .'..,•• kj 3A1J4 8..13 Ac ,•-•-‘11143\-•-•-•-•-•-•-[JILL. II ' .6'4•••• '. ' .;..•- --.14.•'. F, • !"- --- THE "1 ii .e-\ i.., / \. 43 I 18.94 Ac .•:k. \ . 2A1 ..-,A/610;ti., ,+;'-ijriri41:1-‘ • . \ E - 1 10 _ 2/IL3-- 1 IC I IA 2D § 2F 2E 2C • P. / ....r., • . ..\> • 1.c . le‘• '-, = I ) , 4C 2E1 5A1 / - 5;1E144 , .-.• • • . • • 1 1 1 ;__ .....__5E; 8DT .! 1 . , • 2J 2G 5D2 " 11( 8H 1 1 '''• \•. ' 4 L 1 8.75 Ac --". 1L1L- 2A-\ A N NP 5024 ...„,7...... ..,.....,.4c,.-, ,lii,seti, ii..17., e€ ..1, ... ...c.....<::, ......t. . . 1114 5c sq. '-..T.-...\. • r'4:::.4 5D26 502/31 / ......'---.4_-.-,\,,2,., . ., ,...„, ...... 1 ?At 8.75 Ac spy s... fisli°&I . 5A2 5D4 il pr C:-...-'`) '' '• .) OA 1 ( ..--_, 56 , . , ...... scic ma ahris 90 k. 4.2. , 1 3A ,7; . ...0...c., •,---1 .-, i 3 .,.......... .. sou ....,....„--- i 5,-,1•8.--;:e" 4- 5 al . r.6125.:AAi.,:/ .. I i....14,-..,,•:4:.', ... ..; ".14,6A . ilocolliL -1.1 -1-c <1. - , 50, -;i:, V _.......,._;-• 5,3m _. ..;-- HI< 5A3 IF isii0149' :::: •-I-- -1- ...r- _,.,• .4 ,i:i.d migiu rant# .,t, . SIM ---- • • • 7 1. 5A4 5D1 A1 Er. WilliMIErn ,... 4M11• LI.ki 10 lills-- p,,99 ._. --r• -r- -r ": -• Tr J- I • . •• '1-• :.-i- OA* INNEE12139111 2B4A :8.46.7irt. ......", "il .4-, --M A HADII ' 1":.; 5846 56481 '........; ..,......... ,..,„ „.... .,... SUR KY A-WI I., Og """--- ..c -('11-llL- 2A. 7 i . ' . ri_-- 5 o - A4 RPM34 . . ::- 1 LI WM 2°EMU 261 A 2C 2N 2F 111 2p: f , I/7 , ., ., '. Ivo I 5 5CI -I- 5.81-'----- . / • 2C1 I '• ,' 4 'i 9*---'.-- . Iiihns- .: l /ifell -MilIBINWIIMINVIAOS ,Iii, „wiandca am 20 2R 111 .. - . : •. • /tor:.51: GO P''4:1111 M __. . . • 2A1 = .-. -411_A " V N ._. ,0°C --- ---4 i 1.1 ....._ • g' a 5,2 52D 1-7.,;56- CY 2A2, 2AIA• 11.01 _.'• Og 011 -.-._. I .........._.-- •-''"' IN 1 -. 562C ,., • A 5626 562A .. . .1i.k..., . fliglio.- . TIVI'Vrit NORTHWEST pkwy EAST EASI ,---. 2A • • , .- • I 103 Iv 1 5A • B 3C I,3C1 ' 1. IA 2E9: ' 2E3 2814 2E13 4-/ ' r, Ir; 1.311 . .. --..........4.1 a . C. RAFZ , . i i . Niinhadb....1112111311 :-, 0,1Z • : 77.. ... • i ..___---4 • OAR 1 ' KIONt 0• ,- .). ::" '..." •Z-11 I l'i3i 1 i . AUSIIN PLACE II 1141‘.... ..11. : La s..1 , . 'P1,1011 • •i'A tigf15 1 L. !tr. MOOD LANE 2E5 4199" VIP 91' 44;4 3P. -* - ----..:W*-. F._____._._...e__._.:::::: arid A ,r joisk._ 2A2, EJEAST SaltritIAKE BLVD.. ; It. •i 41061M.I.1101.6.6 .111411. ,. ,II! 1 )1.- 2C 2 2B 1B2A 182 1B i ..„ i 1E2 ,---I i i El. it BU IV 1-*---T,' 1132B (- ;7 " 4 t,, • (44,0: , -- °LA .1 . 3 3E 38 i I . -- . 15 Ac •izgl 1•441,041Viiii.LA. ' SO•,c... ' i ,r.-1 topti J.444•04,r Soti . ; i• 1 .. ; .11K alk 181-4 2A c ..;6A1A. 2A2A 2AIA limi......_ -to _1116151P. A ......." . i i PP'. • 1 mill - .-__. , ' IC . IPPP,icia... ..7...i." .: __. ! . '. A I49. . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 "4 . • .,./ 1209 Ac I'-", IL. 11A 11B.-' ••÷.4.-',---tr-ir•Jr•-4--• 110':,. .- • _._..;.--- ID I MI- 7 _ ; '§ -: ........--. IIE 4.4 ._.... ._._._._ t i - .1 r . ,. ..1- 0 7110MA5 CA ._-..,T.EM I. ,lj\A 1 .----.---- StAVE A-474 i .i •-•-• .--._.-. . NH ! ! 1-._ •-14g ! •; I ,,,‘ _ 5A •-•-•(---' E 1 13.6 Ac - - 'r.OP';t49-.- - , -.-!--. i-7 - Cli I 1 ! ! ! ! i 1 .--elAtriS / 3 D . I ID 0 k•-•-• ._._.j 1 ' mirT2 =1411mi*,,, - . .• i I. \OP---- 3 39 1 '''-'-'-'4--7,(4'-'-'' ,F.' ,..-.. i )'‘'i ook- , ....., 3 . ARK -._•_. i 1 2 6A- 6G AM -•-•-,-. -f!.. j d- 43. . ---- 6K1 IV k.5i I i , -) I( ‘ 'JD< i i i 1 -- 1-1 • . f-t ' 5,11 . !, . '-----1 I 393 - NAI„ . GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT I A-80.5W 641- L., i „ 3 .I:1 3 Ac i.1 5 Ac ,,,i5ow sr. I 8tvs --• , - :F.' 2C1 ...', G!..,!:..;•••:: TRACT MAP . CB 5 6E1 ..,!!,--G- 7D-3 v .17Ag`'z . ,.,11\..- V I , „ '4-4 bA4A ` ADJACENT OWNERS 1 AC I kP - • AND ZONING 7 1 TR 585 SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#6 2.19 AC c.„.. J 0 DOUG&DANITA FIERCE r a° a L Ac �. v�E U�GN 5 C INT OP �� A Jn1`�VOr 3..,. 3.186 @ TR 3A2R �r 4 11.Sq@ el TR 566 11 4 AC 3 TR 3AIR A 9.2%2s@ ; I NCI Building Systems I 2 a `, _ AG TR 582Di A TR 5B2 •i 11 S. Naga! Anderson I 35 Industries I �R^3 A p((N� TR 5828 L. Emery ) A`',' 1.6 AC A ' ,r: ' Sfl TR 5B1 ' C3 , C3 1.881 AC L. Emery. • , -.r'' I `TR 6A �R 3C . TR 3C1 Mesco Metal \ c3 L. Emery - .386 AC al Building HWESTpKWY (STATE HWY 114) • 73 I ' . 204 TR 384 .551 AC I. M R TR 38 40 : "... u 1.48 AC 1.434i F P . \�(oy • + ass1. z1r S, 1 7D-4 ,i r 2 I R r 11 u pry 1.0'01 �.rin L , City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY •se No: ZA 96-146 Review No: Two Date of Review: 1/03/97 Project Name: Site Plan- 1.186 Ac.In the Thomas Mahan Survey Abst.# 1049,(Approved Final Plat of Lot 5, Block 1,MESCO Addition) APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Strode Property Co. Hodges & Associates, Architects and Planners 10720 Preston Road, Suite 100 • 13642 Omega Dallas, Texas 75230 Dallas, Texas 75244-4514 Phone : (214) 361-6900 Phone: (214) 387-1000 Fax : (214) 361-0049 Fax : (214) 960-1129 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/11/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION S OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. ..... .;.......w:n:::.•::Y•.•;...... ..tir:.:v.:v:::iv:::::x:m:. { :...�. v.;v.:.•:::::. ...::..-nv..•:::::::..::.�m:::::..-:: .... ........... ...n....•.........................w:::.1 n....:...n.............. :.....r.r..n•....vn...r............. •.::n:::::nl......•.::::::::::x:::::.w::.•:::::::m::: 1. Label the land use designation L.U.D. for the Hagar tract and Walmart tract. Label the lot, block and subdivision name for the Walmart tract. 2. Correct required parking to reflect 32 spaces. Please note that restaurant parking is calculated at either 1 space per 100 sf of floor area or 1 space per 3 seats whichever is greater.Dependant upon actual restaurant seating,the required parking could increase. A 50'building setback line is required along the corner clip at.the intersection of SH 114 and Kimball. 4. The trash dumpster must be enclosed by an 8'solid masonry screening wall utilizing masonry to match the principle structure. 5. Dimension the distance from a property corner to the nearest existing fire hydrant and show the location of any proposed hydrants.If required or proposed, fire hydrants must be installed according to City Fire Department and Public Works Department requirements. P&Z ACTION: November 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November. 14, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 21, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 21, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24, December 5, 1996;Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table until the December 19, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. 4110 December 19, 1996; Approved (7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 1, 1996, accepting the plan presented by the applicant to the P&Z Commission on December 19, 1996; modifying building floor area to 4,619 s.f.; and modifying the drive entering the car wash by increasing the curvature. 7D-5 City of Southlake,Texas * Horizontal and vertical articulation of the southeast and west facades of the building have been provided according to the requirements Ordinance 480,..Section 43.9:c.1.c. Compliance with the a articulation requirements are listed in the attached Articulation Evaluation Chart. * Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. - * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs.- * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be"processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape-plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Dedication Fee,Water, Sewer&Roadway Impact Fees, Water& Sewer Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. - * Letters of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the west and north must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement. A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along S.H. 114. • - * • Denotes Informational Comment att: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Hodges &Associates,Architects and Planners, VIA FAX Strode Property Co., VIA FAX - L:\WP—F.ILES\REV\96\96-146SP-2 • o 7D-6 . Articulation Evaluation No. 2 Case No.ZA 96-146 Date of Evaluation: 1/03/97 • 411 ations for Texas Petro III, Lot 5, Block 1,MESCO Addition ived 11/11/96 Front-facing: Southeast Wall ht.= 18 Horizontal articulation , Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 54 37 31% Yes 54 37 31% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 , 3 0% Yes Min. artic..lengt'i 9 15 67% . Yes 9 12 33% Yes L. Side-facing West • - Wall ht. = 18 , Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required. Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length . 54 35 35% Yes 54 35 - 35% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min. artic. length 9 15 67% Yes 9 15 67% Yes Rear- facing: North Wall ht.= 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length . Min. artic. offset • Articulation not required on this facade. eartic. length 11111 7D-7 8-GL . RED NOV 11 1996 S t I I i��5 Y 1� © LLLLL) \: s 'tip I . Ni j ;138 'Z elial""rfirtil i r .„.. , . .,_...tis, / / ..,*-. A.N gir ilk / % 1 r,' �Q��{,,p, 46.641 in walk /• ,_--.re:i!:.LD:•ti:.*��w� id I 1 r ne•o J. 111 1 -- 11- ,AYE 7 I_ / • •. 41E1 i \ 1 I ®> ' i , 0 u 1 (411. hiir,'",-,, j71 � �` II - 4.E�� , it g a malt >A i! " ill 1119 IP nit ' B�A�Ap�'�gi$ii� •>:iF F 1 a1!q � •11. Vil t �,. �I _ r�q 111 hp ?tip R�R R33ry Se i gE 19 till 1 'V r. 1 i dk PlR5ipA C it 39 1 1 i8 S hill 1p 4 i1 3 p46II :p' t C3 bl P. u 31Y t-' �'•°' i LPtt - 011,1,14 gil 8M Egli- #prig , , , 1 iir III■l III li �� [ . 1+s1+tie "` , : - � °. ,fsi 'N 0 ill il I 3B i a ';f �:':; '. Ere a Z 144 44- R-E1,q • yam � �Od 1�1996 ) r 1 ®N ' ( : ,\p' dD ' r' / / / • ssM� / `'� 1 ' r. , - / I �.4 ` x ' --OX Nei / / ' c-1_ J '/ / / t ' 1: °°1k ./1° ' 1*°' /C- / • / (......! .AO _. WI i i—6°1* CD t 0 co / ...:_ ( .4 it,4.f / it , 1 . ` r I-\ 4/ \' r �w 1 �o / 1 1 .... -- - 1 i . t I I � \ ---7 . / 'N. G /4a Ida . ..I, illit 1 N//,' . %‘, , :7 • . . .... /./ , 1 11•1 ....ii -".NZNI.......N, '_.._'''.__, . '7(• gs o 0 moo) )/.//S, °,4„9._ r c,19 ��\ -- / , l� r. / , I — ; -, _ Goo '4 00 s Z...7 t,05 / �-. eOd:31 I z ,... -- 7 of,' r—"�'. 1 l SM, ( co 1M i 9 ,� GRACj y. 0 . .' ,i ro0 60 • 0 10 30 t 0 t • • I I •OAK24 z . / . . OSN • h i • GRAVEL LOT I METAL BUILDING I SS PP :y' RPP I CO v S• Cr) P • I-42-5-1 km .7 rn `eon a; ow r'1 c�e° 4. ' ' 6PP f SoP - .r a ELM20 / - I - • OELM20 OE- • flt 'iL IHPP 0 I OAK0ELM24 eS892704"E 'b' 40.24' I OELM10 , ^o acn `\\ t 60`' •p. ELM12lik OAK1+ •AK1 • I I O ELM20 OA g .AK20 OAK20 ELM14 +AK2 0AK20 `\� WEST Gw 1�z'trtF O O + 2�O'+ O oAK24 O O s 25.00 LM20 ••K20 OAK4 " 20 00AK18 0 OAK20 CIO: +AK78 , r, V— • — O OAK20 O4O� ,° ' 800'02'33"E e.. ` LM -KtaB,�• SSMH — OAK18 O • + 1 �� a P 9.83' N86'01'33 Ail ssu t`" ilkummummohmeab... W. q 6�+��', 3g y II Q60 60,. LIIIII is _ J`- ;5: DELTA CV 01'21'05" `� yo`:. ^��' �� �� ®' eoawai� RADIUS = 5619.58' - a TANGENT = 66.28' , e�' o`' LENGTH = 132.54' �o� CHORD = 132.54' :P. ) BRG = N8520'59"W • • STATE HIGHmi Y N O. 114 Ex/ST. A/v 77ItagE. t ocArAvos ,+$y-(L - 4471. . City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT • • January 3, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-147 PROJECT: Resolution 96-67/Specific Use Permit Sale of Packaged Beer for Off-Premise Consumption Mesco Addition, Lot 5 • STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I 481-5581,Ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning.Administrator 481-5581, Ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for the sale of packaged beer for off-premise consumption for Mesco Addition, Lot 5, per•Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (1) and 45.6 (a and b). The property is described as Lot 5, Block 1, Mesco Addition, and being approximately 1.190 acres situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. LOCATION: Northwest corner of State Highway 114 and Kimball Avenue. OWNER: Anderson Industries, Inc. APPLICANT: Strode Property Company •JRRENT ZONING: "SP-2" Generalized Site Plan District to include "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include office buildings,hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial (same as in CS, 0-1, C-1, C-2, C-3 and B-1 districts) NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: November 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 14, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 21, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. • November 21, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. 11, December 5, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table until the December 19, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. 7E-1 December 19, 1996; Approved(7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 1, 1996, accepting the plan presented by the applicant • to the P&Z Commission on December 19, 1996; modifying building floor area to 4,619 s.f.; and modifying the drive entering the car wash by increasing the curvature. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the items in is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 1, 1996 with the exception of those items in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated January 3, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-147SU.WPD • • 7E-2 Y I AI 2E l-._- / 1 • 3A1H 3 Hl =.-.4 6.7 Ac �' \, .\, <Yli: �-t P 2E 2E2 .i-i_i4-i,i '\x•Cy.0` �::' / 3AIA j }Ain 3A1J1.-A' v-._J 2A2 !I -i•.,x' ,�j �i /•/ L' G / vE3A1J4 8.13 Ac : // H .. 2A3 J ` ✓18.94 Ac z -' 7HE i i -11 t. '^2 2 2Zi ' •wa+LAND ®M A 6 5 7 fi � ' --1-fji-k-1; - Y• \j�i6C •� \e se .. 18 1 IC to 2C 1�- 4 20 2E A I I I rl ET I 'J.r - -_��,Y .:c 'E}\--,\ �j zEl I -- '� 12 ��. 5A1 , L! `-'SE) 5cl / , 5L 5.:A W!IYi 24`• AIn "J' 8.75 Ac 502A 5C._ an >• \ `r• ."l, ---i1�1N1�+ 1 5026 06 ;' .tCIJ l� t<4^ �Y, •‘-' 1 2A4 8.75 Ac 5p3 / i %•5CIG2 BP .-. 'yZ . 1 �Nl 5A2 5D4 a I ` ti id © pt1oi./1 • ._ •1 . ,-j; `_'\.• ': SD1A .Y I 50 El 8%1A 8W, A. _. T I_f• (' �� SA - -3L--•� } -5A5A 1 -- + axwarrna _ L 5C1A 5� �e� __- : _,. i-1 k‘•. (- _,�_. SAS ©� Z v N5 •-� !" 3BLa' IF �:rntlrla..zAr. r! GI.JMO -1- I. '-I- - _ m :ALAI !:. �. .��� F �iii# •y�� . ✓ri. - F,my. SURVEY A-f04• or I • rl'-lii N-� 2A 2 /5 �C 11 i '5A4A • 265 2810 �< `j-1 '•• 1 • ••f' ! I I- NIA 2CI 5 5C1 �5).--541•--_-- , i .` 3A . ; '\ f • 2D 21 NIA NI j._._. mi J 1 i1r -- / - 2M 'A - ,�n --- i-- - { �f*- :Y 00 V'. __' a •---'- 582 582D r n • pIN i alio E�ogco w ' Ste— 2A2 2A tic 582E 5132A " . 111— TiFI�v M A 3 EA 5A I_ "-1 182 1 `A, ' •.-1EY A-458 Nt• ' 3C ®® � 8 2E9C 11 • NGRTHWEST PKWY EAST 1 S ` p 2E13 ggpsz . 3B 4 2E 2E9 I gRA �7 oN `_•-, 'F LY ! i ' Imo. ��1 .y I I 1 AUSn PLACE , n I lam ' ~ tI� 1 . 1 \ ATEYAOD LANE 2E5 2A2� EAST SOUTHIAKE BLW. `' ,:i I I 2C' 2 162A 182 1B i • m 1E2 �- r--- }-----7 I i It i i i �'' j irr Lil---- IB26 ���K 2 `! - 1 i 3 3E 3C / 38 •88 _ 15 Ac S V' pA S� gl RAr I i i i MIRoN --- ��5. a 2E R eA T ! )F1 - 213A: 2A241Rtg�� Sou ii 1 -?i 6AlA! .. I .- I 2 2A 2A3 2A2A 2ATA 7AlZ !� - est Lao.� 2A ® ' { i i I i i `_i: 1 IC I. , i A 2A1 2 A- ---.-._. 3 pr. ' ..i 2C _I I'1 kA I I I I I � • ' = Ow HOOvtA - � I A I J suet£' A-474 !13.5 Ac • C J� j-) ii ,,{-- iiiii i • 6Ns / MM S G 1 ! ; `� - �eook- , . .• 3 ARK _._.- 1 H /... ` I , ! Q m ,IDt : E I I Q Z I ,h: 6Y1 � __ __ 7 j I ©' I I I 29 A( 11D4 I j i j f-'l 11D5:. �L� a . GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT • • .;n90w I ' Ac :CI • - ---_ II 1 glop 6B3 68 '.• "- TRACT MAP 7E-3 ..FAR.(' , d. f 5l >! ADJACENT' OWNERS `I AC I ?y �� AND ZONING a TR 585 6 SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#6 2.19 AC l — • DOUG&DANITA FIERCEs. �O w a 2.2 r Ac RENC GN 5 T CPU COUR A sA Ep l5 GO es0.66 3.186 @ TR 3A2A - L t 4 ' 11.5q@ t sz TR 5B6 • 4 AC I1 = 3 TR 3A1R A ti. .%25@ ; 1 11 , NCI Building Systems ' AG 2 4 J TR 58201 Z. TR 582 1 11 S. Hagar .. 10 ljj Anderson 3FJ ` Industries ' lR 3 R ,, 1 TR 5B28 AG L. Emery 1.6 AC TR 581 IfLzi C3 1.881 ACL. Emery j r I j TR 3C1 IVIe$GU TR 6A C3 a 3C L. Emerf .386 AC Metal Building ; gWESTPKWY (STATE HWY 114) • '3 : �--� I 0 204 TR 384 i .551 AC 1 *4 . 4 .. n RI TR 38 • too a 1,4331 Q l R R � 1 SI 1. 1.48 AC 0 SI 1 R 2 / g� 7E4 pc, . Lo3114,nA } City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY • •ase No: ZA 96-147 Review No: Two Date of Review: 1/03/97 Project Name: Site Plan for S.U.P. (Beer Sales) - 1.186 Ac. In the Thomas Mahan Survey Abst. # 1.049, (Approved Final Plat of Lot 5, Block 1,MESCO Addition) APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Strode Property Co. Hodges & Associates, Architects and Planners 10720 Preston Road, Suite 100 13642 Omega Dallas. Texas 75230 Dallas. Texas 75244-4514 Phone : (214) 361-6900 Phone: (214) 387-1000 Fax : (214) 361-0049 - Fax : (214) 960-1129 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1 1/11/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. _ 1. Label the land use designation L.U.D. for the Hagar tract and Walmart tract. Label the lot,block and subdivision name for the Walmart tract. • 2. Correct required parking to reflect 32 spaces. Please note that restaurant parking is calculated at either 1 . space per 100 sf of floor area or 1 space per 3 seats whichever is greater.Dependant upon actual restaurant seating,the required parking could increase. • A 50'building setback line is required along the corner clip at the intersection of SH 114 and Kimball. 4. The trash dumpster must be enclosed by an 8'solid masonry screening wall utilizing masonry to match the principle structure. 5. Dimension the distance from a property corner to the nearest existing fire hydrant and show the location of any proposed hydrants. If required or proposed, fire hydrants must be installed according to City Fire Department and Public Works Department requirements. P&Z ACTION: November 7, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 14, 1996; Public Hearing continued to November 21, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. November 21, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. December 5, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant's request to table until the December 19, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. December 19, 1996; Approved (7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated • November 1, 1996, accepting the plan presented by the applicant to the P&Z Commission on December 19, 1996; modifying building floor area to 4,619 s.f.; and modifying the drive entering the car wash by increasing the curvature. 7E-5 City of South lake,Texas * Horizontal and vertical articulation of the southeast and west facades of the building have been provided according to the requirements Ordinance 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. Compliance with the. • articulation requirements are listed in the attached Articulation Evaluation Chart. * Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. i * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be-processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Dedication Fee,Water, Sewer&Roadway Impact Fees, Water& Sewer Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Letters of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the west and north must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement. A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along S.H. 114. 411 Denotes Informational Comment att: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Hodges &Associates,Architects and Planners,VIA FAX Strode Property Co., VIA FAX L:\WP-FILES\REV\96\96-147SP.2 ' I • 7E-6 Articulation Evaluation No.2 Case No. ZA 96-147 Date of Evaluation: 1/03/97 6evations for Texas Petro III,Lot 5, Block 1,MESCO Addition ived 11/11/96 Front-facing: Southeast Wall ht.= 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 54 37 31% Yes 54 37 31% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min. artic. length 9 15 67% Yes 9 12/ 33% Yes L. Side-facing West . Wall ht. = 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required. Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 54 35 35% Yes 54 35 : 35% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 4 33% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min. artic. length 9 15 67% Yes 9 15 67% Yes Rear- facing: North Wall ht. = 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length Min. artic. offset Articulation not required on this facade. Min. artic. length 0 • • • III 7E=7 8—HL RECD NOV 111996 S I Y 11 il� 0 1 iO d I ��a1Iya I l\ % M• }�„!l.�i — 1 I \\$ FtA i',;4ti) ' 1 . 1 00� , I.Ei5 iii." • �1 1 Li�il® `\� Sf'Edi ��� ' 44 s }� ;��� �Y6 P is v' l / . , , ......r,-..,....itt.s,<9 1; 3 --L— .ems,.. „oo.4Vi!4%:. i.. I ' — --— — — t — ,,_ I ---`FJMBALLAVE rig — , a 1110 to ( I ifi ' , I. ��11 , 11 18.ZEUr ri r. i 111 1 ii II II C— —_ n �k i!,' a— F'} t} f C' ,ai A ar !gI tg��4 �qe 4 siea , , By fill dilii �01, 1!eg 9' 1 t ,3 (3 Po } k, • Et 3 a 1S ... c: e' t , 7 i g;p li- . •Et t i , i _a j 9 &tc • • '� '. oral! �� 'p oral' it a' a Egg t � >! 1 # 1�1'( :��� q b 1}yri�}�p 3i .� 13 �' g $ ' ' t -ni- tali., s / 7 i 1 fi as C C7;�'."�" C N p j 5 2 r. i 1 N. 0 ill ` i R FT i - �Y t 81l' to ii „,„vi,, . 4 A'• i , 11 � i [11 i a 1 l $ _ ! _ I. it 1 1 n i (-- 1 r t Tie.-1; I RESOLUTION NO. 96-67 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR E'SALE'7OF- ACKAGEDTBEER:TOR-.OFF=PREMISE CONSUMPTION ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,BEING LEGALLY'DESCRIBED"AS THE PROPOSED LOT.6, "BLOCK" ;,"MESCO;ADDITION, BEING • APPROXIMATELY90�ACRES SITUATED IN THE THOMAS MAHAN'SURVEY, ABSTRACT-NO. 1"049,°,;AND,BEING"A PORTION.:OF`TR:ACTS.°3A1"AND`j6A; AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT"A" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,a'SpedifidUse"Per*tfor'the"Sale'ofpackagedbeer for off=premise^consumption has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as • "'Szil 2"--Geieralized'Site-P1ariiDistrict;:With:"C:2"-LoearRetail Co irierical:Distriet,ITSes; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 45.L:(1)-and 45 d of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific-Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the sale:of=packaged beer for consumption on the property legally described as ;14900aeres situ T ated in the. homask-Mahan - Survey,„.A1stract`No:;;1:049; as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and - incorporated herein as Exhibit"A", subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 5 - 7E-9 • Resolution No. 96-67 Page 2 • 4. 5 • SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1997. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • By: Rick Stacy,Mayor ATTEST: • • Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas • L:\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\96-67S UP.PKG 7E-10 Resolution No. 96-67 EXHIBIT"A" ■1,t,r ,T 41 — .—.IL 1 I I , _Page3 ;i 1 1� —_1I'l ;71 . 1 1 1 0 1 ill t. ! (7y SS ���333 0 4* r, i--.7":C, �`, 1 � i 111 8 IIIIP ( 41 a "'� 1ti i I' 1 I. aft o € 0 PP If i aJ Yln g n 1 '1',:i k g py k. 11 \ m t'6.1 iig 1 ` € t AI y °�1°j ..t 0141101 ¢ Qj� B it.. I, t ,i; # r 1 s �l9i I�4�8i bQi k f 6 4 3� = { yi �, :� n t. 3 g S lei:�!�$![p € S gigy a 41 11 ! G^. I «ti h i i Q t 4 i 6 1 g e Oil i1ito 1 irli hl iiiiii!1t 1!ptg}g iIYi gi 0 11�Q ��� ! 1 321 i �@[ 8 )rI:Y zi ,. . awl "`'* . ry , Is3.1 �'tvr <rwl t e II 1 I �'° • LI !�i FO N �I / _ MI It .. .I— __/ _,_�= al one i�vaw�_---- �, — -1•W': .� irk k••>• gyp00, : �[[ �' ` W'� `'❖'• .II � ,°♦• BSc �i �\ —_�"'••�•� �18 i ■ �x,a � •F• IS 1111. ii?jil .. 41.A\ , i ...:I:X1 I . ' /N • 11%, i 1 .1.11,..:01, 4 1.,1 „1.„<t • le I 1! \ \B �a I. 5.2 • 9661. I I AON 0,3311 7E-11 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT January 3, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-148 PROJECT: Site Plan/Liberty Bank STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for on property legally described as Lot 1E1, W. E. Mayfield Addition,and being approximately 0.892 acres situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474. LOCATION: 2438 E. Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), on the north side of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709), and approximately 280' east of Bluebonnet Drive OWNER/APPLICANT: Liberty Bank CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) IkORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Village Center • NO.NOTICES SENT: Nine(9) RESPONSES: One(1)response was received within the 200' notification area: • F.J. Cosgrove, 2325 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, in favor. P&Z ACTION: November 21, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. December 5, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 19, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. December 19, 1996; Approved (7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated November 15, 1996,amending Item#5C(fire lanes to be a minimum of 24')to allow as shown, subject to Fire Marshall's approval; amending Item#9 (dumpster must be gated) to provide a solid metal gate; amending Item#11 (horizontal and vertical articulation of the east, south and west facades of the building) to approve as presented. 7F-1 STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the items in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated November 15, 1996 with the exception of those items in the attached Site Plan II) Review Summary No. 2 dated January 3, 1997. :\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-148SP.WPD S a I 7F-2 1 5u. -••••,,, 1 :4 501 1 Q'• A ro U.F I I= F k . , A N lk• b.- 281 2 , • 2 SA4 284A go 1••••\ st.-. -1...‘ .-1•-• Z . • 58481 seA vEr A-5.5 3' t. .• . i, IfORMAS41ANAN 4811 2138 287 2812'I12A 286 :_I SURVET A-I04. V 5848 W•14 74-17...i_gi - • -I- - •••1-• 1 •i If -e- a 2 202 213 2S8 285 2810 284 Re' -.. : 7,,, ,i " /a4 ..4 WNW"" 20 2G 2C 71 214 2f 2J 21. - • ,r,lit. ,. . . c!.le .. aytl' 0$ t- I II: 2,35 c, • kin in HMG .,1N .., . y op, •.2F2b] 2t( nil 0 2E 20 28 I 211 1 ... , , • .1X/Ca1131 _1 tttttt 51: GO I 11.10,9/ • . Ill --I 1 9- n 9 0 xi 51-11C1-A -- Mil 2AI 56--"y 584:Em , _Gp... rpso„, .,.. g __ ‘ • Pil'q 2A1A J!\1 2.42• _. 51 •••• . • .-- 1- fl MDMIIIIMMOV _Cv_Ull._rt_. 582C IA 5 ••_- __-- °----\ - • 51328 582A . A.ia. TIlVN/1 A5 E&aarr,t. ...mim 18 182 , ?-) • Fm . SURWY A-458 NOR TH W Es7___.....,,p K wy S T imuilal 8 1 71 IA 269C • • ' 2E3 2E14 2E13 •--" 2111 6 T IF K 2E9 i 1 a a . •10 au K7 , • . - , n • 2E3A 6 2E8 GRAP, ivjA, - Mgr , , I ' ALS 1IN PLACE :- i 1 --•- 1111: 1.5-"- A TE1‘000 LANE 2E5 2 iitat., IDEAST SOuTHLAKE BUM. • cik : I V: i li• :2 :., a 1 • .... - I ..t.moc......maceili,Ilk .....„' 0. 9 - . BC 2 ze IVA 182 18 ' _ 162 • i--I- •.ee,. 111111 149/ke• . 1). 11328 frtlicAtqK ii144 _ . , i lio, old, 4,..4104. . . , • I i r 1 i 3 .3E, . . . e • > ..- ., 3C , 38 89 .... "1•' (...- 15 Ac 9° 9 ir 1 0 , -. I 13j • <i 2E 3•7;'''55.5 ••R 2A3At sou •• ,..r.- 2A2--"111P4'°' • - 1BI 1 -44.i 6AIA: 2A 2A3 A2A 2A1A 881 i - , a 2 2A18 381 „....--4 3 AI fttliW _-- . i I • 2A: _.-.. . IL,__.i L J• - (:ID ic . 2A1 _- 2 3A/ ''' . ••-•- , _..._1111)._1 12.0g Ac 13.6 Ac e-- 0 10 : : 2 , M -- ooVi 3A IA ---- 1 "iecl-[01 (5--- -(4.5 ...7.4.• 11D 2C HE 1 . 11A 1113 r) THOM A 5- E A --.;i4la 5 ---- - - ST.A71.€ A-474 I i ' SA t 1 . --0.05lii5.9e-, . (6-k-,i 1, ..1 -----4--'3-,-..71--• /.,1.„, 1103 3 c PA -__T__.1Ir i4 - 60 4A1 ----- -/ c ---- I a, 6H ---'- I . I .• . . I 4A4 a I a . '.. <:. :--- 1101 814 681 ern'Of 1 I 1 •:":. sla . t ....- ..,•„.- .x. _ ---- _ -1 ExcH7AE si_vo i I 1 I i • :7- 1104 ma I-1!• ri •------1 I I 105A1 383 3 0 1 GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT 0 6- t t 1 i 3 Ac 6.15 Ac / . t NO5g e INDUSTRIAL KW/ 1 ..., 68 I • 591 1 , a , 5514 . . or .. --- 1--- -0-4--a- 0 61 Ac .0- • ,:z., E,F IAi18i , _. n_ * TRACT MAP •i i u IN° 9111)%1- e , I i I 361E GY ........." ,A ‘' .... ..... % ' SUPV ,I 1 . p(-\___..: rl'AG 1A ---. ___ . ___--- • • 7F-3 I HOZ.- C 1644.3 111103 1..,,644, -1810( CI I-03(41 181A 14 •I • \ • , \ • • • : \ . / 1 / I ---------„Th_ 1 IY I 1 1 ) /ritCzt o _1 JI . _ . — • _ _—- - ADJACENT OWNERS I r lib I AND ZONING )f 1 I -,.. z 1 1"---) N\A . _ . _ . _ . Spin #7 Representative IPeter Sporrer \� JjJ 332 I Wetzel frl "C-3" Family AG Partnership . J. Parker E . j-- � - • - • -I- . - - 1E2 - - I "AG" I R. Lee 2 C �/ H. Eaton I "AG" h4V., State 31 A i Southlake Kimball. ` _ of Texas R W 1 ;._/-' Venture• J a l � � � 2A3A1 2q2A2A2 2A " "AG" C_2" 2A2A 2A1 2 G. Nettleton R. Lyford 2A City of i 411 Southlake "C$" 7F-4 ' City of Southiake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY •se No.: ZA 96-148 Review No: Two Date of Review: 1/03/97 Project Name: Site Plan -Liberty Bank, proposed Lot 1R1,Block 1,W.E. Mayfield Addition, being a revision of 0.892 Acres out of Lot'1, W.E. Mayfield Addition, in the Samuel Freeman Survey Abst.# 525 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Liberty Bank Ernest Hedgcoth Consulting Engineers 5801 Davis Boulevard • 5701-C Midway Road North Richland Hills, Texas Fort Worth, Texas 76117 Phone : (817) 656-0038 Phone : (817) 831-7711 Fax : (817) 598-6424 Attn: Steve Ingham Fax : (817) 831-6368 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/23/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. ..... •::a:::.:::4•:.:.�::. sa:........:. 'Y :...:...::L:..:::.t•N.,::•zR?•:::=• kin•::::nd:::.::•:s::;r..::..;.;,.:;..;.N.::.:,.,.,;.,•,.,:.:..::.•:..:.»»:::<:<•>••::t>.:>.:5:.•:t:s. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties: 2. Label the type bufferyard provided on the graphic (i.e. 20' Type 0 bufferyard, 5' Type A bufferyard, etc.) . Provide minimum 24' wide fire lanes as shown on the attached sketch as specified by the City Fire Marshall. All radii of curves must be a minimum of 25'.(P & Z Action 12/19/96: allow as shown, subject to Fire Marshall's approval) This comment and attached sketch reflects Fire Marshall's requirements. 4. The proposed fencing along the east property line should not extend into the common access easement. 5. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation of the east, south and west facades of the building according to the requirements Ordinance 480, Section 43.c.1.c. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown in the articulation evaluation chart. (P &Z Action 12/19/96: approved as presented) 6. Verify and correct the following items in the site data summary which appear to be in,conflict: Total Area of Lot&Total Area Landscape & Green Space Area; Landscape Area, Interior Landscape Calculation Chart,. Open Space&Percentage of Open Space. Proposed Building Usable Area&Floor Area labeled on the graphic. 7. Delete"Note No. 1" regarding construction of utilities. S 7F-5 - City of South lake,Texas * No comments have been made concerning driveway spacing and driveway throat depth.The driveway for ingress and egress to the site was approved, as shown, on the Concept Plan for this site by City • Council on January 2, 1996. P&ZACTION:• November 21, 1996;Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. December 5, 1996;Public Hearing continued to December 19, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. December 19, 1996; Approved(7-0) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated November 15, 1996, amending Item #5C(fire lanes to be a minimum of 24) to allow as shown, subject to Fire Marshall's approval; amending Item #9 (dumpster must be gated) to provide a solid metal gate; amending Item #11 (horizontal and vertical articulation of the east, south and west facades of the building) to approve as presented * No review of the landscaping is intended with this concept Plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be requiredprior to the issuance of a building permit. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. Please note that the sign as currently shown on this plan does not 0 • meet the minimum setback requirement of 15' from the property line. * It appears that this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit the Plat Revision for this site must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. • * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing "Case No. ZA 96-148" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Articulation Evaluation Chart, Fire Lane Sketch cc: Liberty Bank Ernest Hedgcoth Consulting Engineers Paragon Design Group,phone 421-1945 IP P-FILES\REV\96\96-148SP.2 • 7F-6 _ Articulation Evaluation No. 1 Case No. ZA 96-148 Date of Evaluation: 11/15/96 Elevations for Liberty Bank, proposed Lot 1R1,Block 1, W.E.Mayfield Addition illived 10/28/96 ont-facing: South Wall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 34 6% Yes 36 34 6% Yes Min.artic. offset 2 8 300% Yes 2 7 250% Yes Min. artic. length 9 12 33% Yes 9 12 33% Yes L. Side-facing West Wall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation , Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 53 47% No 36 36 0% Yes Min. attic. offset 2 12 500% Yes 2 4 100% Yes Min. artic. length 13 8 38% No 9 25 178% Yes Right-facing: East Wall ht.= 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation . Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 36 26 28% Yes 36 28 22% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 2 0% Yes Min. artic. length 7 13 86% Yes 7 13 86% Yes •-facing: North Wall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length Min. artic. offset Articulation not required on this facade. Min.attic. length * The drive thru canopy was not considered in the articulation evaluation. . 5 ' . 7F-7 1 .L .. PAWNS RrrrAarA•II.ncr. _ SCALE 1• a 20' I WETZEI FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD. r.ww PARVIRR.e3 PACTS ,.., HWY.Ili OTLAKE DR. /106 ANrTHA nc.YRL+,r.78746-5373 IMr161{ —_AG' +.+r rr.' p.ry. • / IMo:E USE Ii _- JIIA / , WEN C' 4nR. 7O1T D CH, j - WEN IT!'• PaMaC ' lit NORTH RICHUND MILLS,TEXAS 5 D9.47'00•C 206.20• 1 - 3.72 AC. OUT OF TR.1 OF WE. r.V, - '••• a �S ,' LIAYFIELD SUBDIVISION clomp Luaf✓I•a..A '., . • •' as ri ,�� Ur D'IralCA LAND+COMAD MART MANED 'C-3- "'*4--Alfr ' '^' ' ' " "� Fx 1709-S JTALaNC BLYD.L.U.D. MIXED USE 25•R /,L.( • r /J I '•••' . • }Ira.. 80'R j� � r 1 I na•w na i LAND P TO IL INC AREAS PARKING RF.O IREM N 5 J I ~`a•, n� J tt 1 t ..A/`` •70TAL AR LOT: 36876.E S.F. S * r +•r `N SS "•• ,,�.�'• ! I Ai t�•• 2 • • BUILDING do PARKING AREAS: • a J s s Y. • ' crso3s an i PROPOSED BUILDING USABLE AREA: 253170S.F.5 F. VICINITY MAP - _ PROPOSED BUILDING SUB AREA: 3425 S 5 i f I B ° • [f:l]a7 Sr 'i j� , j i RE L.Axle'PARKING LOT h SIDEWALK AREA: 25530 S.F. 8/ • ! 'LANDSCAPE k GREENSPACE AREA: 9921,8 S.F, • �+ ! N? I dp 3 A./• �•' rl ' J i "RIGHT OF WAY(R,O.W.)AREA 2008 S.F. . • I 6 ! jI CONCRETE APPROACH; 531 S.F. 8 - I j/ IS LANDSCAPE-GREEN AREA: 1477 S.F. ' ( I ! /' "II*. /.7f" •LANDSCAPE AREA 9 1398.8 S.F. x "� -..7: I�20R 6p.�/%/���ENT ,F�i" N HARLEY EATONBUILONGNON L SITE CODING VERAGE: 8%S451,8 t 44'R -'•• 7 ``\ 'p, k� + TR,1-B1 k TR. 1-81A PARKING REQUIRED: 18 SPACES _ ] 2550•E. SOUTHW(E BLVD. PARKING PROVIDED: 24 SPACES 0.95 AC ]3•,- r• f r MANED AC • "„d.'." �:,"" '°' i,.r.,[ni L✓ �i' h. ��► ��� � L.U.D. MIXED USE i:Y..... Y:+"..�',/:.:�.;.. ...w...:.°::IL',... \ ••• N • W..•Vr a fi.^ii'ir•H.w'i'.',u.,i.[i' I%'i'•i i Wi i'i M ••trK. er '• I _ t».yrf••. ,1a rr="gt:: "u,rn r,"'", ".`;r,,~ 4•:,,. /' liP]' �Kr� �r t3--.':fit•";F�wa��� A* eIMHARY )wrw•,{:air +r:»,n "•a. /~ J•��� /�/ �I - LAID.•NIXED LLS. ✓w ' - 26•tOTMDN EXISTING ZONING• C-2 �.w ,u.r rcw.n.i'w<.:::«r 3nr..r,. ACCESS ESMT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDLILE•BEGIN 11/If96 }nj • may_ I� 0 ;0� y� 1�1 PROPOSED USED• DANK mu: .Y_ t� I �?R� �7��1,I��1 �I' GROSS ACREAGE•0.892 o-"•"`• Sp"••r.T""" Sn A,t r. •.[ NET ACREAGE•0.892 00 \ �,\,``Irj��•�.,-•rr.��' AREA OF OPEN SPACE.9922 SOFT. •• • - ``��r17 v4��_ . PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE•230 Nerr • ..�,_Cl. owA • EXISTING TREE COVER •107. $� BEING A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE THOMAS EASIER 1.UTILITIES TO BC CONSTRUCTED DY OTHERS IN p '� Ury to.TD DRIvtvAY - AND THE S.FREEMAN SURVEYS,TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS ACCORDANCE WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS. 43 1R'E AND PART CIF LOT I.Vt.HAYFIELD ADDITION. ---- / \t��,�, K•15 iuYtvAY RECORDED IN VOLUME 308-C,PAGE 4 2,T[RE HYDRANT LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY FIRE ,.AR\('3 TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS 1 3.2a'FIRE LANE AS OIRLCIED BY F1RC CMI[F. 1'..(/ 0.R,Q 4,BM 384.7B-RR SYNC IN POWER POLE ON THE WEST A 7jO9)\. W,, • SIDE or SHADY LANE SOUTH OF DRIVEWAY AT WV \ SHADY LANE. Dypp• • `\• , . se ,3i,• 7�4 ' ,\ SITE PLAN FOR LIBERTY BANK A , s PROPOSED LOT 1 R 1 , BLOCK 1 s , n .z°°• - W.E. HAYFIELD ADDITION ,,g ti� `� CITY OF SOUTHLAI<E, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS \_ • i' BEING A REVISION OF LOT I OF THE WE. MAYFIELO ADDITION AS avnLOTtI.i OCX ILA] �/ r 4p'•]7t•C - RECORDED VOL. 388-C, PAGE 4, TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS LUJ).•unED USE.C-7 .� GEOTGCiOvx Mar,ADDITION ]OSD AC. y t ] 81 OEORGETOWM MONTICELLO PARTNERS, /� L• '�11[ D COUNTY CLERCS rlLt NO 01941116656 �y N APPROVED PRELIMINARY.PLAT OWNER' REED DEC 2 3199E j / LOT t,DLOCK 1 MTARRAmT COUNTY ATT CLCR ?ERA%S , f . O[7QUTDSO PARK Q p49 V LIBERTY BANK ZA y l APPROVED TOR fILIHG GtORCiiDVN.OLTICELLO PARTNC�, LTD. 5801 DAVIS BLVD. ERNEST HEOCCOTH f taNn LNTY CLEWS rrtc TRE ORDS { CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. 5 CQNTY TCO RECORDS • RTN-C NNW AND TARRANT CDUMTT TEXAS NORTH RICHLAND HILLS uPROVCD TOR Tri1HG TARRANT' COUNTY. TEXAS rosy(..,)•PA A -1 T ' PRINTED.DECEMBER 23.199E U1Y1 u1-n11 -� C.3[NO.L.I-... • .. 0 • • ' T'1•!y' G •�'� MACHO KOOK.•10 SPACES SCALE I AMNON MwIR..t7 spun NC.1:.:) i' = 20' j WETZEL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD. urTu,.sE �„ .• ...... .. STATE HVY.I11 102 WESTLAKE OR, 110fi 1 AUSTIN. TEXAS 78746-5373 WIN IOW.[wets C' MDVIDC. 1 ZONED 'A MST WV QPA•C. ' / 1 L.U.D. • MIXED USE TDD1,ell (c' I�$773 PARKER • / PROVIDED - NORT17 WMITFIELD CK. / aan.ts 1 vc37 o]• if i SITE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TEXAS S 09.47.00•C 206.20• 1 P.avlgs 3.72 AC. OUT OF TR.1 OF W.E. r ' MAYFIELD SUBOM5ICN ' '"e'o""'•WI,[Sal _._ ' - __ n.cA. ZONED "C-3" / / -__W._______[lAM[__-_- u.c TOMO LPNDTLVDa nos •N L.U.D. .c MIXED USE �/ 25 R• /._ M.,A .,. s FW 1709- 60 \ /; ' SDUTHLAKC DL VD. • • /roo aA• ao'R �� ! / I , // /6D. \ y5'L 6D6 jji� '�""3' LANDSCAPE TO =UIl01NG AREAS/PARKING REQUIREMENTS - f I "• r f- 44'R��1 , J •TOTAL AREA OF LOT: 38876.8 S.F. .o, Exl ••._,___ % BUILDING & PARKING AREAS: 1 B s , I ,r PROPOSED BUILDING USABLE AREA: 3170 S F. . : f 7 8 'ADREE°A;3145 SF f E VICINITY MAP n ' F e 7elf NET:3 5•7 Sr i j PROPOSED BUILDING SLAB AREA: 3425 S.F. ' • i1 I / / Ri 8, j % 20'Rj , PARKING LOT& SIDEWALK AREA: 255J0 S.F. NI A• / I •LANDSCAPE&GREENSPACE AREA: 9921,8 S.F. S M I I 6p4� J �J ••RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.W.)AREA: 2008 S.F. • ttl ' I7 I. CONCRETE APPROACH: 5J1 S.F. ni1'i L �i •S - LANDSCAPE-GREEN AREA 1477 S.F. r /T,` •TOTAL AREA: 40884.8 S.F. • A %�� • 6`k S LANDSCAPE AREA: 11398.8 S.F. • Z I �/ / J A a NON BUILDING USE AREA: 35451.8 y,/•20'R 6p, `'' C / • / HARLEY EATON BUILDING SITE COVERAGE: 85 I j . / ( TR.1-81 &YR. 1-BOA PARKING REQUIRED: 18 SPACES • J / I 44.R�•--,,,` / `'&��� _ 'r1 ', ? 2550 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. PARKING PROVIDED: 24 SPACES �� 603'� IA t j g 0,95 AC ' 1rl,lvr iu ZONED AG A...., .c T EI•NT.•wax...,_•• :0 w E.I LEI NO PC 1.w Ni nas 6oD� :I L.U.D. MIXED USE Tom.••N tncl >••w••• ••, Ann n•.„• YhS I o .. v r. /__•... a��,'- / �� 3] V.c•w „c., r.,w w r.nv.w r c s..c,.uc..�w, N��LGJ ' r / ,>:.Il'F E....,..,.tti.i�i'i.:w'1.,:,:�..'at�,:":r:`im�vt�... µ vVp E3F,r h, •` 4�• RI04MARY I TKc[swMi- 7:1 rv,�tt�•.+�'•uvw.r�wi ii ••q L.U.O.•MIXED USE """"'•"•` 26•COMMON .'K."cinv'o°.v w"roni''v a<in."mi..+'•"m.Vaal s"°"nt'"c:r:•" _ ACCESS ESM7 EXISTING ZONING • C-2 _ I CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE•BEGIN 11/1/96 T I / I PROPOSED USED • BANK m.. / —., 1 ' rr GROSS ACREAGE•0.892 iR'w.w I. n c"I n"'' • \ •I,` kj •5 I• 4r4'...J_ NET ACREAGE•0.092 ..'............................ ��sa, A•• AREA OF OPEN SPACE- 9922 SOFT. q \`,, ,I`D' .... _ PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE•23% ��y 4' `�A EXISTING TREE COVER • ID% milD Q'\SOV . BEING A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE THOMAS EASTER. I.UTILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED RI OTHERS IN T/-T,, XXI'TO DRIVEWAY AND THE S.FREEMAN SURVEYS, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS ACCORDANCE WITH CM SPECIFICATIONS. TF a AND PART OF LOT 1,V.E.HAYFIELD ADDITION, \0(J(e� A6'1S'RAIYENAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-C,,PAGE 4 CH FIE HYDRANT LOCATION AS REQUIRED DY FIRE - .. A'4p TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS ��:M \(13p R A 3.24•FIRE LANE AS DIRECTED 9T FIRE CHIEF. `4 7jp9)\ p•w� SIDE or SHADYR SPIRE IN LANE SOUTHD/ER ROLE CF DRIVEWAY AT 1004 NEST ` SHADY LANE. . f...1-.......- - ..2,..,7. ..........., \ ^,./., ° f SITE PLAN FOR LIBERTY BANK n �_ 7E,z. \ PROPOSED LOT 1 R 1 , BLOCK 1 Rase. - ,ty �•„ W.E. MAYFIELD ADDITION 'Qj• - CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS APPLOT CI IIOGt 1`AT L.U.D..MIEEO USE\C]�Sy x •= r 7�'7%2• ````` - • • BEING A REVISION OF LOT I OF THE W.E. MAYFIELD ADDITION AS GEORGCIOVN PARK ADDITION ye f RECORDED VOL. Jett-C, PAGE 4, TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS • SCSI AC. 43. GEDRGCTOVN MON'IpELLO PARTNERS, / - 8� Df. '�-�+ li COUSIN CLERK'S FILE MO D196106676 APPROVED P.ILOCX I PLAT RE6'p DEC 2 3 1996 COVNTY«ERK•S ACCORDS / ^.5. I ie/ LOT 4 CLOCK 1 OWNER; t ,ARRANT COUNTY TEAS ; _ G[DRGCTOVI.BARK ADDITION LIBERTY BANK APPROVED MR PILING Dose Ac. ZA qt.,- I '� r. GEwGCTDWN MOLTICLI(O rA4rr2�, . ERNEST IIEDGCOTH `TD 5801 DAVIS BLVD, [DwITT COMITY S PILE ME D1961B6656 CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. ETARRA T EOuNT RECORDS NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 01.1•c MIDDAY ROAD TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS APPROVED FOX FILING RAT ODNN1.TEL, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PRINTED,DCCCnB(4 23.1996 ""I"'_"" ME NO.L.1-14. • III . . 410 • • • • . . . .. 1.,i,, . .,.. • . .. • . • ...::::. 1 ..,...... .:. :•,::„„.:... . ,.:.... . . • .. ... ......:%::..,,::::.... :.. :,..:...:::_::....::....:...,a;...:: :::. .1. ..,:,••• . • • . . • ........:. •,,;.: :::::• :,..„„:.:•:„::fr„,„:„..,.: •...:..:::• .,.. :::. ,•.,. . / • . • • /- .. no• 0.....0 Motnee01.0. db. • P...00n 0.00 0..0 • R .......11•••••• Airen•Ashm Ye*. .., VC*liar.i...• Yoe*.nese TRW c • - C.M...-•••• t'el5S.‘2 ....... Neese .....r....;;;:z., , ••••••...... . . ' • . • . . i 11111111111 IIII I Mil MI I III/IIIII t.tale 1.11, T•••• , . .... ;= ••••p ....WW1////////im. MEM= .. A...•/////////// ‘... OMB MIR ..... isslim i' .i Southlake•Tam. ....•—••—e—...• --JL-_ BIEB,111111 ... - _ ' , ,_....11.1.11.11. _ • '-1-1 1 . ,-- . .• tow-•,:.-...w4p.1...:.. ..-.... ... , .. . • . • • ,...• • • k .. . . . . . F 'r o n t Elevation _ ..•.•, 3/3 2.••I•O• =.- .7—. ,—.... • '.......". rene Cower P.o.e. • • • .v.• .. - • - , . . . ......ee, (P—e12•e II of I-0) • t, - 1 27 Juno 1996 I • c L33111112 i . . Rovielons t • . . • • 29 Oct.:43*r 1996 ..... mmm.m.mmiii vimiiimmimmmomm m.m.m.mommi eli.M.mmmimm. - •••••Ell -•NINE• •MEIN III INI MEN II • _ M MEIN II 111 MEIN• MI MIMI MI •MOEN• ...IN 1.... al inil MI .... IN MEIN. III NINE. ... .=.•—.—.-7-.A.14.1„, E EEO V E E EINE II MI IOU• MINIM• . • ..r.......... ......":-.:-.. 0,-••••••••..'Ma • I i .....=.,:_ti., , Pion Numbs, • I 1 I L 1J3A3—1 ; . . •,... HT • . R I a Ft t E I a v a t Ton I . . QU-ILIS . • • . . ,• . I. . . 0 0 • . • % . . ) . .: . .. . • ... . . . • .. . . 11.-ct..: . - . . . . . • . = • . .".':.:,--,,,......:'.:::.:.. . ...:::• . .. -:...:' '.."i:::......':...: ::.].M.....i...;:i:i;'...;;;1'.'„.. ,....- .. :,':' '.•:'.:••:.''.'•!i•:.',:r- .•.. ,;•.... • ... ..•-•.. 1''. "t:ii. . .. . :.,,„••,•,;:•,.•• , "•:•.;••'• :•;:••••:•-•• ::...• . . • . . • ... . - • . , • . • NED r........Pian•O.Me. Inn..Do.s...... en..own.• 'al iM bow*non.. ?Sow. f f•••••••• , - =MIME _ " , IMIIMIM . .., ••••• IM ."....••••N. 11.1.Me . . ._.___....., MIIII 1r N.....4.w...,... tit 1.11.111111111111111111111111111 „„„,„„„„„„„m„,„„ „„„„„„„„ , I............ TON 1.9.73. EINE III •MINN• IIIIII I Jr'...... , E MIMI III •MUM III III t .:5.L % .. i ' •NEON MI .... •MONO III OEN I I t ,.... ..,•MINN• •EINE MI MOO I I .... .... I I ,.... ‘,.-..) I. I . . .• t t *". t - ,,r, Rear Elevation -..,) . . 34•1•1 3/33.1 •3' ........w.x........,.,. ... .. . _. ...ft.1 lry pg.. . . I ' ••••0.4.0 PI, t II 1......11 36........ 1 ., ., rl • • . • ..• • o—. gP4400.00 ''...s L.L.--L-I • . . • _-_ ---- • • . • , . . . . . • , . . . . . •.......1...... . L 27 June 1996 I ',V r., ---111ftbkk • _ 1.951.82E Rweloioos - 25 Oclobof 1996 000. „..„„...-7„-,...„M„. 1111111111111,1111110111111111101111111111111111111= . . .ii"1111 .. . . 11111111111111111111111111111/111.111.1111111111111111111. All 1 11 I II MI 1 1 11.4".....4.....7..Srras . IM _ . , . • El 1.,Will IP= - .........-......r.-.....7... inwini ---""'---.m.... . —.... ---"""— —• 0.n.o.o.ono ' . . sow 19, • 4A.,..... "... ' + LDA3-2 %...... 1./ Lett Elevation - - - -• _.. --- (TU-1 qa, 1 . . . . . . . • • . . . • n, - 5 1.1J J .AM ••• 3AIJ2 3A,J1 ,Ai - VG i 1 4C1A { r- �Z BR p�' PAR m e • g 3A1J4 8.13 Ac .p Ap r 14: '- 4 te.94 k .'..� J �� SI4 4G r-®J ,- '- J3ST 4ot ( , ! a j3A1 �. .182 - IA ;--' ^ - .- _ a.-�__ EAST- MCMUND STREET -: 101 ff 71 �. 16 18 1 1C to 31 MIMEN r..J i IC 2 ow5. / .a YR 1 SCHOOL , �, I!,1:1'- 64k MiV', MIA \'� Ida 102 in 1D2A v� ��•' 1 3A d 3A2 In8 1. 1C T .•.�1 , I 24.91 k .. L '•� • 1 . _ ._ 80.1 k AM i •' fl --- ';,;, ,�! , NALL i �1o14 �.\, . HALL �� - ,8:1AI A-dd7 Apb , A-69J1 ! ,. I�I6�1l ® CAA®S 3A `fs.?', i , i i iiiA• .WSJ i�11 ' j ' '% --- ze 21ua�� �.�..- �.-_ �_ i I 3 2BIA 2CI 5 �'� _y \,�� OA---- J-1-! /\ -�'iiliT�Y7■ 2C lE /p p�y(( / • 1f1, \ 3E g , �;u.. 1 /`�� •�lAi5 ._ -j1 3 I ✓ i i . 2A i- I ' ' 1 ! • I 1 / r` 1 1 1 i _".�--U• _� l__' 1--� r. H,! 1 "� rV• Lam,..• I =U . 1 ! f•-- ! "f 25k i i i i 1..I •! --i 22 ,...,J03A 303 ' 3C ?w I. 1 ! ! - SAC 111 r:w,r�` i i 7.665`k 3.4 k , e�1413D1Illi'�; 302 3 k �'{6 *1 Ilki•i.•r- _ _ _ - , EAST S0ul1+UuE SE 50 5131 502 • 3A1 3C 38! 4C 40' 7A i 1 2C 2 ZB 6 Ac r•a"8,43 k 457 k p1�G bt1�k 156 k Sp,:.. l �70g8 ' ��e4� IS k fffiii✓✓✓ 1 "•y k " P• P1)4 . 30 �115 Ao-f- 2z11 k i. ' App‘11130..D:, t 2A3 I. � i i1 i i : : : • . ! ! ! ! ! i i .� ,\— _>._,_.i ��>. t ! I i A. n I t i i i 1 ! L frTL AO 213 2,k :` 4E1 : -, _ A1i •..ii • iiii 1i , - • • • B 283A OBE p.J� W �{,��ryp�yp�y� , ' /'--1---- (��•r•,.,�•:.r ., i . © g Ol 3L DI A IfU •• K11VO'k7H II 20 Ac �;\ • I •~ •••—} I nzyr.:�smas -�_ SLIMY. A-d99 •• Li r'-i i i I 1 } 1 1 i i i 2CIk - I,r SD.n k ;; --'- nw.,mn�.K ca� t rL' 6 . ! 1 �----=— — to 1 i I ! 1 '' 1 j t . I. ! .Y 4E . f, `fin{J (�i._ I S ! .�. 'a! i(!'! .. i • 27 i . ,r.,:<.:.y - ,A3 -- 20 k m :xr _ i ! I c ��is 4 /• -i- ! ! 48 I �. v b°&ISLE-• n r •� q r. r • ` RAg1BON ST. '}A j1 la I_.J1._ `'r. i ;-ii;l i ! 1 f r'-, 2A 28 2C, co , W V $Ili 1 ;''1'.:‘i ; \t-- - A IA 6'.,�3)Ae _ 'i - - 8A-5 , 1A2N! ..,....;,..,::�-�� = TRACT MAP;fin: - • • _ • i i • 682( 6C 60 Y.:.1,i . �.... 10 AC' 13.4 Ac II /2 • ._ I.0 L ° ' FONOT EN 4 26 2 ,� to fe4 laa s s 0. too Milk 4 1 F OHNBY LNF. 0 lla Ito ita E:. . `en �'SIMCIEu: CT21 SI 101 7 �`3 8` 11Q t101204612.0 _ 177 :r 0/�1 1]0 0 :10 ... 0 IL 0 7/ TR 3C F- /ti .%/.� L A 3.0 AC A xlo / 2 `a I TR 303A TR . TR 38 Pl a c nr 3.41! Q n 1.0 AC Mendez Lmtd_ J_ Strurncft I • o � � xlo "AG" $ „SF1 A" "AG„ TR 302 2.0 AC soo `� / 7 R .D 3.6: A S . TR 303A a • TR.3D2 7.665 AC� .1-�` 3D3 TR D `�j r`^I `i 3 419 3.6 AC i 1T79 Ac 1-93 Ac '` • �p V E i; . i A� • f zc 3D4 1 \. r .066 0 • .085 QTR " State at Texas f CP __ _- _ _ - _ _ _ _ State of Texas _ 1 TR I'B2 TR TR TR 4D2 (.151 0 \ 3C1 .063 0 3B1 . 3DIA 9 TR 3B .017•• •009 0 ; .707 AC 1 • 11 n I . "AG,1 AG I R 3C _ Pr e f A ad 12 AC Timarrcm Land Carp_ , TR3B1 2.773 AC I . 1 1 i 8A-6 ' I 4111 . • ADJACENT OWNERS r I SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#IO AND ZONING AL MORIN • TR 3D. City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY thaw No: ZA 96-124 Review No: Three Date of Review: 11/15/96 Project Name: Concept Plan for S-P-2 Zoning("0-1 uses) - Crestwood Office Park,3.508 Acres in the W.W. Hall Survey Abst. #695 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER: M+ M Group. Inc. - J.E. Levitt Engineers. Inc. 100 W. Southlake Blvd. #320 726 Commerce Street. Suite 104 Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone : (817) 329-6996 Phone : (817) 488-3313 Fax : (817) Fax : (817) 488-3315 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/11/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Provide a 50' building setback line along the south line adjacent to F.M. 1709.#1 (P & Z Action. 11/07/96: delete and allow a 40'setback line); 2. A minimum 8' high screening device meeting the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, 0 Sections 33.2, 33.3,and 39 is required along the entire west property line. The applicant has provided the required screening 3. The following changes are needed with regard to proposed driveways according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634: A. Correct the driveway spacing distances to 227' along North Carroll Avenue and 510' along F.M. 1709.The spacing from an intersection is measured from the nearest point of intersection of the right-of-way lines to the centerline of the proposed driveway.(P &ZAction 11/07/96: delete) B. The driveway intersecting Carroll Ave. must be a minimum of 250'from the intersection of F.M.1709 for full access driveway. The spacing provided is 227'. A "right-in/right-out only" driveway is permitted with the spacing as shown. (P&ZAction 11/07/96: amend to allow a "right-in/right-out/left-out"driveway on Carroll Ave.) C. The proposed driveway intersecting Carroll Ave does not meet the minimum driveway throat depth of 75'. The depth provided is approximately 30'.(P & ZAction 11/07/96: delete) D. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis for this site, if the trip generation of the proposed uses for this site exceeds any of the criteria established in the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Section 3.4. Provide a minimum50'III 10' x loading space for the 16,727 s.f. building. The applicant has provided a 20' x 30' loading space. 1 8A-7 City of Southlake,Texas P&ZACTION.• October 3, 1996;Approved(6-0) applicant's request to table until the November 7, 1996 Planning& Zoning Commission meeting. • November 7, 1996; Approved (4-2) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated November 1, 1996 deleting Item#1 (provide a 50'building setback line) to allow a 40' setback line; deleting Item #3A (driveway spacing distances); amending Item #3B ("right-in/right-out only"driveway) to allow a "right-in/right-out/left-out"driveway on Carroll Ave.;deleting Item #3C(minimum driveway throat depth on Carroll Ave.); adding to delete 10 parking spaces and use pavers for 20 of the remaining parking spaces; accepting the applicant's commitment to provide an 8'stockade fence with shadow box along the north property line. * Please note that the applicant has deleted only 6 parking spaces and no spaces have been designated with"pavers" as opposed to standard concrete. * This review is based on the "0-1" Zoning District Regulations. *. The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting,must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 12/23/96. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule.All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Any building on the site that exceeds 20' in height(UBC standard measurement) or one story must setback from the west and north property lines such that no part of the proposed buildings encroaches above a 4:1 slope line from each property line. Otherwise,the minimum building setback line from the west property line and north property line is 40'. * N. Carroll Ave. is indicated as an 84' R.O.W. on the approved Thoroughfare Plan which requires a minimum R.O.W. dedication of 42' from the centerline of the apparent existing R.O.W.. If the opposite side has already dedicated R.O.W. per the Thoroughfare Plan, this project should show a R.O.W. dedication which provides for the ultimate required 84' R.O.W.. Future alignment of the off-set between North and South Carroll has been determined. The applicant should contact the Public Works Dept. for more specific information. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of the site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation(required on the north, east, south, and west building facades)per §43.9C1c, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Masonry requirements per §43.9C 1 a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and§43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43-C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13, Ordinance 480, as amended; and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Residential adjacency standards per §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended. 8A-8 City of Southlake,Texas • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No.480, • as amended. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. * ,The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit,a plat must be submitted for approval and filed in the County Plat Records, a site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter,Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: M+M Group, Inc. J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. L:\W P-FILES\REV\96\96-124CP.3 • 8A-9 • t • r • f 3 ` r , Ala..tf x. LOCATION KAP a 4 AP.Y..D.M.P.lur o i•I I L.I. T i..i.O X. D. AO ..7. / PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LTA-aaD.OBHIT IE6DBIIML - In In � 1 X WW.",`wu eS IMCY nano. Post e1 s'n.l' .arai Teerrro imni Couupbe Ten, '.EI!Y.TOB: 1 i F cfM1N6f15ouWauf.Z.1 welun.°tt Ynur.0aa.Pos. 0Y Y e a^aa ea .dfardnl fnb.T.w+,cad wb prcl OAL.CD..M 0 MAW. i.t tang more Da a. SP-IA S aYM'D'C F "-• -•..-.- -. S '�' i LID.I®.OBHIT fi®9]IPl. •J" jk.u• 1- -..- .�. ....a' I]r m1Qu"."::.°la:D w.on.Ion,for�.1.al �n"..000 x:l - _ m nM1 N.O.M,an of SeuWvp u r (F.x.1]Os-. b , J O; 1rLl. :9 s__ _I Ily.��) �f' • IND.M 09 Dr 2r 101.18• w north a..of Sou.. \•:• `• �J•'i v I:f�J" I 9ouxwrL fro.m•iwmm,�.W tor eonr M D.aNrH^go M.surfs L I% ftm'ws.control moo of Dr sa•6T and•ra no N ._ i .0 D I i0Ud0 ens.rid PY•..a+w Y,raging d Soya.fai.ra�i. ".. .::.o • i . ... Dxx.Ow m.mm..a b soma r I �` I •.� I '. O° /:•i 1&'Z max a ar N xa'..I:ur arts Da north w d sanlua.. ,: t4 TIN Sawa.. Imal d tom/an ns a a so amansa.sort..ael h b.t W D.1..U wow, �..d d: 7 �,a"O�b.t.".o�w.a.6010,rood a w D.x�«a..r txxM 0'. Ix. .-. 0 e I Ilea x m lo-of Emi.la.mmc n an w el owe toter �_y s .;• r P.b m P 1/z I red foam for amen gysy =+•. ":g+. i�yp��I ��r�\� o C-STOTT 0 ^ 41' k d. }I� !Ng s er.D•sr c Iw.u•.a�w w Ian..vwxb ad.a �Y. . t on 1 O' 2�• t�a^�. • I a-1/x• and fxM N M dC..S .w e,IM dams Vdu'I.f GG .........u..con,emna..aoraw n Tam es+. I` Pass 206 d M..Dwd Mare.d...Cam]•Too: = a l - �'1.` µ •• .• L' ;�`i w ;• I 120E S AT hs M.S.WM.dons w.uM w el wk Strva. ._...._"'to!^"mW'°'>.._' a �ae - - 1 • ..� _ f e /z M M lava 1u soar F art Ins at M.CmW m ar) .•G,. 1 I pr.. 1 o DI -„2, -3. „ aDD�.>a >sl Corral • •> i.,-, ✓ ... .,--,-- T - _ y -- 1 e. 4.sr 3.00t.a ell•Iona. d , Ds MADAM.Ca..ro m aa.ai a .I. t V_. .d a i M gRCf)fm.CROUP .N10 f � - a- Sdo- odw / trr.donao.. t•04..R /) 0 - I D.MIWW.Ta. rdr. ...-5 s`-L t rk^P_Ll"✓ \CT i = 10 w a \S N1a]er•• I ,n - 1—�--t�t IM ercelr: ar // \ I O y/ , mroZ p,St.a smao --•._........................-........_......_.-....1..._......... ....._.'._.-..._.-1_y�aL1y'.0.GIJA.N.I.WRY__............-.-.._....-.......-........__._._... Jr.!_... • L.1Tl.W 014Ad'SwM: f'-00 .� .-. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (Fad. 1709) a oR— a t _'La-N SIS• • a, �t w.w KILN.SURVEY A-sn�'V_n:au,s srzltY A-.n y a a f Coma ran.fan • • CONCEPT PLAN y I——— — CRESTWOOD D��.. I I I OFFICE PARK M-f-M CRG 0UP. ING. 1 LAND COe• I 'PDX . IC.PICOT.P.IC Y.ISO,P.In AN ADDITION TO a I wC aw_pm DA.T.fp.,M DA.TtA.I%. 'nllwdLxl.s].®x AG I AG LLD LED Y 1 I 1 I THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE maw LID-am DENSML I • TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS c...../PI.00.]c I I ...I.ea.L e vl� R.R. HALL SURVEY ES\113IIM'ER5I.INC. • - ABSTRACT NO. 695 CNOD5YL9 PLANNERS PRESENT TONING-AG L' _+ • IDOSTING USE DENSITY ACT ��"' A RECD NOV 111996 PROPOSED ZONING-S-P-2 RISK 01 USES 3.508 ACRES Smywa GENERAL NOTES AL-AN WARO�SUIRVEYINZI CO. =-'�..MD•to•u]SJ• 29 OCTOBER 1996 MIT�:-0.0 la]D x cxdx.:PNYNa-xa r.cLs S r,222 rooD. aG. 20 SP 2S rot.]-n-no .:>tvo•pa-________�dDa . • { 0n.M0,ZAPS-I S . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORP, r, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING AP1?'ROXIlV 1�1TEI,R 43: U$ ACRES SITf7ATE t • HALL SURVEY ABS 1 ACT:`I TS 6}S T T ,,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM 'AGI' = :GRICI°JL" '[7RAl 'D!I.P R_CT TO " W° r.F't GENERAti ED S' ; ,'LAN °41: ..:..,, . ,. . I'I`E . ... DI omegii-Diqq7wirpshE , SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; • PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business,industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,morals and general welfare,all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as MIMI,WILWai Distal under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a,change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and OthWHEREAS,,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,at a public hearing called by e City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-219.SP2 Page 1 8A-1 1 facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites;safety from fire hazards and damages;noise • producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, SWHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water,sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed 40 and amended as shown and described below: Being a 3 5Q8 4-0-re tract of land situated in the W"W:':all-Sufve ,Alistfac t3=Ni 5; L:1CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-219.SP2 Page 2 8A-12 44ct 'ap: and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto — and incorporated herein,froni V Agri to ' 9P,1:221,1Wiiir, Plan i act;" l%idarail `e. i' O f c:Orslic e , as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"B". /h Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map e City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and "all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, 'subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with.a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be • severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances • affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-219.SP2 Page 3 t 8A-13 until final disposition by the courts. 0 Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: S CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-219.SP2 8A-14 Page 4 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-219.SP2 Page S 8A-15 EXHIBIT"A" BEGINNING at a monument found for corner at the present intersection of the west R.O.W. line of N. Carroll Avenue (a variable width R.O.W.) with the north R.O.W. line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M.- 1709—a 130' R.O.W.); THENCE N 89° 05' 27" W, 101 . 18' along the north line of Southlake Boulevard to a monument found for corner at the beginning .of a curve to the left having a central angle of 01° 36' 05" and a •radius of 11 ,524. 16'; THENCE around said curve and along the north line of Southlake Boulevard, a distance of 322.09' to a monument found for corner; THENCE S 89° 18' 28" W, 121 .51 ' along the north line of Southlake Boulevard to a 3/4" iron rod set at the southernmost southeast corner of that same tract of land described in deed to D.J. & L.A. Mitchell, recorded in Volume 6818, Page 1094 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; SENCE N 00° 10' 06". E, 283. 16' along the east line of said Mitchell property to a 1 /2" iron rod found for corner; THENCE S 88° 46' 55" E, 104.45' along the Mitchell property line to a 1 /2" iron rod found at the southwest corner of that same tract of land described in . deed to J.P. & G.H. Strunck, recorded in Volume 6365, Page 206 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 89° 54' 44" E,. 444.04' along the south line of said Strunck property to a 1 /2" iron rod found for corner in west line of N. Carroll • Avenue; THENCE S 00° 55' 36" W, 281 .05' along the west line of N. Carroll Avenue to the place of beginning and containing 152,823.68 square feet or 3.5083 acres of land. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-219.SP2 Page 6 8A-16 ivr v e; • o - .,. . , I cn -- ,tom iill 1 aid LOCATION N AA.!dN.9111U.C. 4. ' r•0.6.1.00.1.2. n LID-/�DBSRIEmB2Ml 1 S PROPERTY DESCRIPTION O i'rw ' z K. °'sump.A-1-195.CA,N Sorin.i A.7 mw"'taw*•• N % r ail°bn:nw.7r.4. ... dip. ..1 c.t,•,.A mcn[u i,65 a m.III..bwm.N Tan. crity.T.m.,w 6 rv... f ST-1,,o9. Ie G f r . morn pa ..,"ad..c. !A mA.A,GD,,f. v... St-IA f b'N'Sx'[ C ..-•` !!1'f.'M�L 1 e[Gxrax2.�.nv.na.IrN�. IV Vim.ham* LID.L®.CB3IT IESC6fNL '�+cu. �w.u• 1- �. au.a' err a..• mne06 72 .1 N x,f!`s.N/w.(.wn.W N.Ip PA..,) • • Y 01m.c O .:..Y• --12 -y, IOI._ J I O WtNM- ` I CofICT dderaxeR Of.nrwws wa.d tr... M.slaw - _ I a N A.-.N. 1 .xH a cY 26'or c w a nai.u: I -4..•. C ;D'Ct as.rA....e P r..1 fr.N f.Ot 1,1.... • ..vim, .1: uI i I ...._. VO° nInd^1 I^� • UU�"V • I.f — O eI = d �Vr ., ... ..w•...I.......un PM u .,.. •- _- 10 a..hi ara Ina Or.a'..r.•°a i...w U.n.TA. ..a,.aS.a ' .V• f—.� „ :« rrcL S eY x•..•L..0 A eA..,u w a ra anereA • • ✓ a.,Jz:.n MT.Aa,r..�wF AM in.NKe..tl • / L...IA. arm a' `.T f : f�CC f 00 ff•]f..lDi Al•oaA P..a1 fn.N F.C.rM ril { ±.� ' P.120 M.I. e 1— -.. : `, , T,e toms a.,:,iaZaa«N.4-.ro•w c.n+,W fSf ue.ae wwn �� •• f D.II_fv. A'C1fL I 4 ', LID-IC®IATE — r. .. ,... ... MTf f 1111C . ... 1 A.m P.O.Ha,u .hr. yyI I S.I A '. n VI is t Le...872P Tf c1— — _ _ c ww NALL DAM A-5i0',_ _-M-.IAR F.ES HAVFT A-A.I -. '._ } 1• w _ — SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F.M. 1709) = =k_ =m oTa.Tr y, _ _ _ _ _ _ OW.DY]i'3JV!V A.069 • CONCEPT PLAN ' ...A_ - - - CRESTWOOD 0.A22/717.1oar: I I OFFICE PARK M-I-M QROUP. INC. 1 .RR011 u11D CORP. I r.2222,r.Am...TAX NTP.22 I c AN ADDITION TO Wit D.IIT,®..TL D.t..O..TK. m, . he AO I uD-� AO T gnu I I THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE LTD-Tm LBmT ra�naL - TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS Lcu.«.a/r2.m.ca: I I 1i.8. HALL SURVEY J.ts LEVITY , �f ABSTRACT NO. 695 DrclRTxRS as a SS.INC.PL,IMLI¢ PRESENT ZONING-AC LUD-MED.DENSITY no - RECp N O V 11 1996 PROPOSED�ZON ZONING-S-P-2 TITH 01 USES " NG USE-VACANT mn w,'��s'c'ISM 3.508 ACRES 'Any,. GENERAL NOTES AL_AN WARM 9URVEYINO CO. •`-+f:,c ARM.16,517 v. - PM 604.1.1 MU2 ca^} ..AANc•11 PADIS 29 OCTOBER 1996 ' 2•C=M.t-120 PACO cw AD.2A05-112 • 1• City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT • January 3, 1997 • CASE NO: ZA 96-150 PROJECT: First Reading/Ordinance No. 480-225 Rezoning and Site Plan/The Children's-Courtyard STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning and Site Plan on property described as approximately 3.207 acres situated in the.R. J. Paden Survey,Abstract No. 1255, and being Tracts IA and IA I. LOCATION: South side of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) and approximately 200'west of the intersection of Waterford Drive and Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) OWNER: Lila M. Pinson(Tract IA) and Lloyd Martinson(Tract IA 1). APPLICANT: Realtex Ventures, Inc. IIVRRENT ZONING- "AG" Agriculture REQUESTED ZONING: "SP-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District uses limited to day nurseries only and adding private kindergarten uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential(may include limited low intensityoffice and/or retail uses) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Residential (any Single Family Districts) NO.NOTICES SENT: Thirteen(13) RESPONSES: Six(6) letters were received within the 200'notification area:. • Charles and Vaunda Whitacre, 110 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed. 1). Increased noise level with 300 children in our backyard. 2). Increased traffic congestion/problems on FM 1709. 3). Decreased property value because of day care in our backyard. 4). Loss of privacy to inquisitive children. See attached letter and petition. • Jack and Kelly Kapich, 1402 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed. "We • are especially concerned about the noise factor (we love children but don't want 150 kids playing on other side of our fence) and secondary we're concerned about the traffic on 1709 this could be a mess." See attached letter and petition. • Karen Nyhoff, 1404 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed. "We are very • strongly opposed to this project particularly since our property is adjacent. We fee this will lower our property value and make it difficult to sell our home if we needed to.The traffic in and out will be significant, but most importantly we do not wish to be in our yard or sitting by the pool listening to day care children playing on the other side of the fence. We know how much noise children make (we have 3) and it will be unacceptable whether it is 20, 50, 100, or 300 kids outside." See attached letter and petition. • William Harless, 106 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed. "Increased traffic. Proposed business could affect(negatively)property values." See attached letter and petition. • • Daniel George, 1406 Mayfair Place, Southlake, opposed. "Increased traffic on 1709- 300 children screaming at my back fence-Reduction of property value." See attached letter and petition. • Stuart and Mary Mclean, 104 Waterford Drive, Southlake, opposed. "Traffic to and from will be unbearable. The noise level for the home owners is extremely undesirable and will have a negative impact on the value of our property." See attached letter and petition. Five (5) letters were received outside the 200' notification area: • Carol and Charlie Broadaway, 600 Bentwood, Southlake, in favor, "... Mr. Pinson has gone to a rest home ... (The properties) are nothing but eyesores and a day care could get rid of them ..." See attached letter. • Don and Carol Johnson, 3130 Peninsula, Southlake, in favor, "The Pinson are elderly and in poor health.They need to sell.this property and not have their money tied up. This family has lived in Southlake before all the new developments existed. To have the selling of their property • blocked again would be sowing bad seeds." See attached letter. • Phil Jobe, 3838 Oak Lawn, Dallas, TX 75219, opposed. "On behalf of the Stone Lake Home Owners." • H W. Cook 201 E Highland, Southlake, in favor. "With regard to.the . opening of a new day care center in Southlake, we think there would be • more advantages than disadvantages to this proposal." • William B. Kemp, President-Southridge Lakes HOA, opposed. "The land use plan classifies this property as residential. Therefore, commercial zoning is not appropriate." One letter in opposition was received with six signatures of residents, all within the 200' notification area(names are cited above). The letter's main concerns are: compliance of the Land Use Plan,generation of traffic,location of driveways, location of building, loss of privacy for homeowners, and the • noise created by children playing on the proposed playgrounds. See attached letter with signatures. P&Z ACTION: November 21, 1996;Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996, due to Resolution 95-24. • December 5, 1996;Public Hearing continued to December 19, 1996, due to Resolution 95-24. December 19, 1996; Denied(7-0). • STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review No. 1, dated November 15, 1996. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-150ZS.W Pb • r S IllNovember 17, 1996 • City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake,TX 76092 Attention: Planning and Zoning Commission • Mr. Chairman and Commissioners: On Thursday, November 21, you will be considering Zoning Case ZA 96-150 entitled "Rezoning and Site Plan/The Children's Courtyard." Previous development actions have created a situation where there are two small parcels of land located between a residential • community and a local high school thereby limiting their uses. As citizens who live • adjacent to this property, we recognize the difficulties regarding the future use of the properties. We also recognize that the landowners' past actions have substantially contributed to this recurring dilemma. If we could have our choice, we would prefer to see the properties purchased by CISD for 0 the high school or have a developer build several residential homes on the sites. We realize the likelihood of this occurrence is small and the probability is higher that these properties will be developed as a .non-residential use. We are not opposed to non- residential uses,but its granting should be given with caution. We ask you to be selective' with the properties' uses and take steps to ensure a developer cooperates with adjacent property owners to create a development which will enhance surrounding neighborhoods. We have reviewed the proposed ZA.96-.150 rezoning request and•ask the Planning and Zoning Commission to deny the Applicant's request for the following reasons: • (1) Both, the Master Land Use Plan and the Corridor Overlay Land Use Recommendations have planned these properties to be used for medium density residential allowing for limited low intensity office and/or'retail uses. This •large daycare and school for approximately 300 children does not meet the intent of these City planning documents. (2) The proposed uses are high traffic generating and create peak traffic issues in an area which is already experiencing severe traffic congestion. The developer has stated that previous studies show peak arrivals/departures occurring within 1 1/2 to 2 hour time periods. With this in mind,we have the following observations and/or concerns: S RECD NOV 2 01996 8B-4 (a) With 300 children (not including staff), this use can generate 1 car.every 18- 0 to-24 seconds within the peak time period. Add 60 potential staff members and the values increase to 1 car every 15-to-20 seconds. (b) Between the hours of 7:00am and 9:00am, which is the prime time period for dropping-off children, current east-bound traffic is stacked-up well past this property from intersection of Waterford Drive and FM 1709. Customers will have great difficulty exiting to the west while crossing the congested east- bound traffic as well as exiting into. the east-bound traffic. Arriving west- bound customers, trying to enter this property, will cause traffic stoppage and have great.. difficulty crossing the congested east-bound traffic. This dangerous situation is exacerbated by the close proximity of the proposed driveway to the intersection of Waterford Drive and FM 1709. (c) Between the hours of 4:00pm and 6:00pm, which is the prime time period for picking-up children, current west-bound traffic is extensive making it difficult for west-bound traffic to cross east-bound traffic and enter into this property without causing stacking concerns or dangerous turn situations. Many of the morning conditions also exist at this time thereby creating similar traffic issues. This dangerous situation is also intensified by the close proximity of the proposed driveway to the intersection of Waterford Drive and FM 1709. . S (3) The proposed driveway spacing is 200' from the intersection of Waterford Drive and FM 1709 and does not meet the intent of our City's requirement for 500'. (a) The incorporation of a "right-in/right-out" driveway will only cause further • safety concerns with west-bound citizens performing U-turns to enter into this property. . (b) Moving the driveway to the west may benefit the situation, but will create a concern with the full access drive on the CISD property. At this time, the CISD driveway is used as a fire lane, however,nothing restricts its later use as an entrance to the high school's parking lot to which it is connected. The most viable solution to this driveway situation is to have a very low traffic generating use zoned for this property or to combine it with the high school property. (4) The proposed driveway does not meet the required 75' depth requirement. We question that this required 75' depth will be sufficient for a use with inherent peak traffic issues and the mentioned child drop-off process. (5) We have strong reservations regarding the interior circulation of the proposed parking lot. Having only one egress/ingress on a narrow piece of property can cause • dangerous and inefficient internal traffic congestion and pedestrian concerns. 2 8B-5 • (6) The northern building is situated.facing east causing its side to face FM 1709 and the • rear of the building to be seen from FM 1709. • (a) We don't believe Southlake citizens want to look at the rear of this building when traveling east on FM 1709. (b) Placing the playground close to FM 1709 creates safety concerns for the children. (c) The 6' chain-link fence is not appropriate for this site. It creates safety concerns related to the children while allowing everyone to see this facility's playground equipment and accessories. The placement of such a fence will also require the removal of some well-established trees. . (7) The large playgrounds (for up to 300 children) cause extensive concerns: (a) Substantive noise can be generated all year round. It is of special concern in • the summer when many neighboring residents will be outside. Residents can already hear tennis court conversations and school activities, one can imagine the noise from large numbers of small children. The Applicant has tried to downplay the amount of children that will be allowed on the playground at one time. If this is so, then why ask for so large of playgrounds? Even 20 small children can generate a lot of noise. (b) The existing wooden fences can be easily scaled by adventuresome children thereby causing safety concerns with many of the adjacent residents who have swimming pools. . (c) In effect, neighboring residents will lose their privacy to inquisitive children on playground equipment. (d) The Applicant has suggested moving the southern building to the east and planting more trees. Unfortunately, the.movement of the building creates further privacy issues. The addition of more trees will aide the situation, but cannot remove or substantively reduce the noise.. (8) Within 1,000 feet of the proposed development, there are various sites which are already zoned to allow this type of use. At this time, the City should not pursue the creation of a non-residential development.,adjacent to a residential community, especially one planned for medium residential uses. The consolidation of the two lots and the portrayal of the site demonstrates that residential or non-residential uses can be located on this property. As we mentioned • earlier, we are not opposed to non-residential development on this property. Our preference is to have one that is non-intensive while designed in such a manner as to 3 8B-6 enhance.surrounding property values and citizen quality of life. We ask that you consider • our concerns and deny the Applicant's requested rezoning. Thank you for your support. Adjacent Stone Lakes Residents (see attached signatures) cc: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator . . Southlake Mayor and City Council • • • • S . 4 8B-7 Adjacent Stone Lakes Residents In Opposition to ZA 96-150 ata2g4-NL-WwiAdcaledacia_v flo Ittitcosa �7��"GJ`r-A c3-- �- I / o ll L,r a'tert,7i�,� .So.,41 /6:&19no-E7X4., tot U . /6904,e, p > ,Cbt /4.6 i7laez , „haixeakb • DaNi S us-an, CKtOlF. 1 I 4 o cp N{'dl-al r a1.Sau°P41. 5 8B-8 mac'` () " ` p REC'DDEC 051996 aua J ( P v-z- ,-/-z-e-ilef"S 0 , ?,..O."„it ep-pt_ Y.Z. , ?//,c/ V/471'74 /& jiA'' ze 1%s( Iiiell- aid (5., .%e4E4.a74. dui-1`._1'-07/ ,th Cia7` 1-1. ---- 1/ A i.e,,, zt/ r.--7 so ,_ - 174-ti /, I,-i 4. /'1-i-z- 4.-z.:,,._) —1,14 9/P4R- „cf- ,/lsz-j 411e, 42. ?Ow. A',4_;,_ Al,/lotix> L a? idte-c- --17- Aidv 1 ':-,2 - •Ale)( 4; -14,A- 4 -61'4' -/e,e, je;ie ,:tci,j OZ./ A A- Oeire/t/r; ,74. 1; 4. M4P"'1- /V e.ij 0 ? d4 . tuaz _dPix4t-;-6'. 1 l,,I .17 A/,‘A e ..i t ez,,iA V- 41/4&4) a.14 /4 4 4 i - . je-t&st-1 - -Z/A-A/2)2j k -,--471 uatii- . .--i d/2,- /pte2-7- it )1'( ' '714,- - ...,e-r-,-0 . ,147---- , , 1,7 .‘,t-p- 6P .-z211 ei /L'it i-ifr- 1 1a4e.r g/thil( Lam " 0 S (g oo &-se./ 4`il'i 76012 i'iliA247 7/- 4I-3/- 3 &,,,--- z \ 8B-9 3130 Pen;nsc,S�Q So H � TA 7 v 9 a s C��,-e *F,,•e�.�t o. -��e d. . T o .0Pre fin. y L 19 9 4- � ( tp-e- y b)ocie. C.i 04, So tZ d ✓�-e.ev c . 61 To. `f 0 ;s r.ce . �outt, k� DLQ. , T 176vg j rc ) Jan , ob on oiald ft a. �n D,IaO� nr�oido � S ,��s I, ) (Q()c s va+e FOR +1The self - & P; moon proper )OC c on 40 L J- ,b0L,1-PdoLke.. 43)vd 4o RED DEC 51996 ocIO \70 b s e Q. 1 , S h -6e. c_t Yee. i S f Y`ne.. Yw W U Irza • M 1,'2.6 tee.d -o .aQ. A-tti,«, , a-1Y.d rw+ 'e8. . • • • • :'r a. . 3. x A TR 105 y • Southridge Lakes . . .. , Y;,;r . 5.165.0 C31 SF--20A 0 •r Hoeowners Assoc. 'tt ''" • - E 4. C3 171 0 1 • g c� 6 z • .782 0 _ ++C3+, , ;';,O1%T *0CA' s'►9 ' 5 R Grace Presbyterian Church a 5 : 1 ; - T iX s; Oa ,,, cc 1 - F.M. 1709 State ooTexas - - P SO1YrHLAI .915 O ,b ,N / TR 113 4344 t TR •1A2 ,a 10 3 ~ .088 TR I� Southlake Properties State of Texas ° ° R 16 = 15 ii NOR MAND• Y D 2 ,� 07 ,02 TB,a ', SP-1 I J. Hudson = 2 PUD 29 ' ,OI p m Carrot High School W. Harless _ 26 = % R 1• • ,q 134 _ 14 Southlake Properties J.V. e U, 0-1 rj f C. Whitacre r' • 24 .. I N no +30' y .p �g •�� J �i ro - s . �9 16 nI111 - •' .Nyhoff lake �DY 's‘ hq South 23 G. Daniel 8 ' Properties % 17 . J- Kapich •D 22 . ry .` *AYFAIft PL 11/ ,,, 15 S 21 ( O • C. Williams` : s 13 a 14 o `'' 1 - - 12 ' •p g' t Ir}• . ,a. 70 16 3 20 = .893 0 — -z ,.s ~ 4 11, 20 j'R 19• - 18 17 �, 'a. -• <,. ail 40 65\$ 21Gg1100D CT 30 R ' ,-, :•'''..'%,•,'::22,7::r i .•17-71V• . •4:: - . a. 31- A • ADJACENT OWNERS 25 I . 28 g AND ZONING ••1<. I 14/ ID CT `t. a 27 2 33 z - i ;:- SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#13 s JIM • GOGG ,� `• IN 8B-12 4 34 64 Pr' 29R : 26 4 City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Ilse No.: ZA 96-150 Review No: One Date of Review: 11/15/96 Project Name:Site Plan for"S-P-1" Zoning,Children's Courtyard,3.2743 Acres in the R.J.Paden Survey • Abst. No. 1255, APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Realtex Ventures, Inc. ; Gary Wood 1825 Wimbledon Drive 806 E. Abram Arlington, Texas 76017 Arlington, Texas Phone : (817) 784-9947 - Phone : (817) 548-8714 Fax : (817) 468-9521 Attn: Jim Mills . Fax : (817) 261-2302 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10728/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards: A. Correct the bufferyard type labeled on the graphic for the north bufferyard to reflect a 20' Type '0' bufferyard. S B. Label the "provided" bufferyard types and plantings in the bufferyard calculation chart. Provided bufferyards and plantings must be either equal to the required or be an approved substitute. 2. The following changes are needed with regard to the interior.landscape: A. Label the provided landscape in the calculation chart. The provided landscape must be equal or greater than the required. B. Clearly designate all areas intended for.landscape on the graphic. Although there appears to be enough lot area to accommodate the required interior landscape,the area designated on the plan appears deficient. No landscape parking islands are designated for parking spaces adjacent to . the north building. Provide the required landscape area in parking islands (13 sf./parking stall • is the required ratio). 3. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways and compliance with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634: A. Minimum depth for traffic stacking is 75'. The depth provided is 70'. • B. The minimum driveway spacing from a R.O.W. intersection is 500'. The proposed driveway is approximately 200' east of Waterford Drive. • C. According to the ITE trip generation manual,the use proposed on this site exceeds 100 vehicles in the design hour and will require a Traffic Impact Analysis. 8B-13 ' City of Southlake,Texas 4. Label all entrances and exits to buildings on the site plan. • Show the proposed finished grade of the site, with contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet on the grading.plan. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc. Note the benchmark used for the topographical information. This should correspond to a City approved benchmark. 6. On a separate sheet or on the site grading plan provide the location of all existing public utilities and the location of proposed connections/and additions. Show the location or provide the distance to the nearest existing fire hydrant from a property corner. Show any proposed fire hydrants. Consult with Public Works Dept. for existing utility locations and requirements. P&ZACTION: November 21, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996, due to Resolution 95-24. December 5, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 19, 1996, due to Resolution 95-24. December 19, 1996; Denied(7-0). * We discussed previously with the.Commission that there may be.a point in time when staff could eliminate the detailed articulation review and forward the project with the recommendation that the submittal met.the"intent"of the articulation requirement. We feel this submittal does meet the intent • of the requirement.and we have not included a detailed review of the articulation. If you would like for us to still perform the review,we will do so prior to the meeting to consider this item. * This review is based upon the"C-2" Zoning District Development Regulations. * Please note that playground equipment cannot be placed beyond the front(North Facade) of building 'A'. * No review of the landscaping is intended with this plan. Landscape and irrigation plans.meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. Please note that the proposed sign does not appear to meet the minimum setback of 15' from the property line. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed through the City and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. • City of Southlake,Texas * Although not required by ordinance,staff would appreciate placing"Case No.ZA 96-150" in the lower • right corner for ease of reference. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 12/23/96. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule.All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6"x 9"and an 11"x 17"revised reduction must be provided. - * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Realtex Ventures, Inc. Gary Wood • -. L:\WP-FILES\REV\96\96-I50SP.1 • • • 8B-f$ - Han1 mob Mere,' Teie'ftioR;h:id • I• new Lot I.dock• Lot t Blo o Exi•tlnq Zoning--AG. • �,I ca.nroi•i �.I. ..n•i oars..A.ore... y I1 ProPowd Zoning-`8-P-1'with varied•Gd°uses •UMMMY ata,tY-suratvwe _ nmtr. ro..e n•. r e.a — I— fl•0K o.ouf x..w..,w . w Pp ..r Pa .�r,r 41111 Land Use Designation-YlWlum Denelty Residential• Pp y •nr. t- r•. Ni•••. - - 1.•. sere A ]I.O . 1 R t- 11110 1 Area or •(approx.61136 s.0. PIP scents ace(approx. 6I.54%) ram. R.I. o Is.n II 'n OS n►e .,.1.• Estimated etrtxalon March L 1988 Pr 1..1•1 A w-n ' 1 N N n.— B C Estimated tint of cartnactlon Dec.31,1998. m.,t•nWM. - .... °ppee IOW to rot_ r W tr •v. Approx. e'to w.•tr..a tan•.1 aporldp LP Pp ROM 1 Maximum Dldg.Height-201 (Ac ILLL.fPPR%ID') rt..... Posam1-02 BLVD.OP MP/ 4 Maximum No.of children- 36o n+ ..••f..rootr rt.r - ruan0.0 4•.4+s p•v.0 ea' e w —i-.— Required Paritlnq- Z'2o cII-I.G + SeP/cXILo• 11..pAct3 OP* '•0rw...w.t .,ttt..,••as.0.100.-rt+•■••••rrr+usae...•r+•••s• , •ar • -i Provided Parking-DG7landard,Handlcep,Total i �...r<++re+n...�•ar•`......OP....�"'<r' " Al_- 7 77 i % 4 .. 41r 5 11 !Y-0/ �i�/!i/ Required Loading Spaces-2 (Id aed) • t .y,r at1a01tAllY LTURY-QrTOIIOa I.txaaC•R ! ,I `\` ? / LotlebA, provided Loading Space►-2 'el/ \- —76 eaw•.•nw.uw+.v, aT•r. Irr.w•s 4..—Y P.O.• • la• P. e..••ta.. jLYpers,Realtex Ventures,Inc r..w (pp PPP la.nl .�eDo• 33 No.a her Lea. fter. MP Pt If N ITI S l.e U. / I829 Wimbledon Drive PIP oan Mt v Arlington,Tetras 16011 •n.....+n...rfa....I.•w.... o.watr. ', (DM 184-9641 Fax:(811)468-9521 os.r�.. ' ^ r✓n.aw \\\I �'" _ Contact,l ir.Jim MITI• . •_ ' , /trchitectt Gary Wood Architect 'MAGI IA, R.J.I 11 51/P.t(, A-I255 I��1 ! � 5 ''°'°•°"""• P 1 e06 E.Abram Street .r r •4 i.;b.M1„� %J .ram• 11.11 �\,pa `r,•$I w....Lot 2,ev r�`.....•,r. •"'..,"'ri a...."'�... 1.....tm.•• —t•t t)•.-�^ saw.•..nop.ur P. Arlington,Texas T6010 ..,`.a....•. r�l.o n•.t.....3 �l c.r.. w...wp.�,un:.��•_'L'�'!F"`.i •�+.y \ / nw a'a etw.L... (ell)184-9941 Fez,(8111 468,3621 .•nm:M,,,,µ + „ ,ram,,,,--,' / \\�m %T.; Contact:Mr.Gary Wood . *ty ram..............•.•m•trw. 0 r \\\\\\\\r\Q\\\.���'�_i1 .Tro Y4. 4u10 A4- 3, (3.101 kxt5) 139, et.- O;, w•:.. :"° ' ? r' ".:'ie.. :.'r.......•••:o lur to, _P•o.mw r... r.. � k ICn • Let a.etiva.i 1bTt1 BUII DING XKFJL 201500 5F :.:.. ;':r ramrows Iwo.arm*s•..............•, d��Z �` M Li i . ..• •f•r•r—••o P.p.arr r POP••• c�. II rwrJo.o.a etarW W.••' \\CAPOLL,IINt..plCfx • v� lame WI 040-114, -III 1 . 1- 7A-1, RJ. H(D8N 5URmet, ,t•1255 1.6ib r•.io-AbmCa • ��� POW j .01 V =_'911111111111111111111111111111111111111�' ���.'�" "+'r.`..n`.''•• •'"' ^"'" \\���\"`�\\\\\\ r4?lNo F . ..MR.,....ww�xt,•.rrr.n..u..-....a Scala r.�.. -� ��✓!� \I\ \\\` `31:i ..per.. 9. :� ..r�., etc via a Noma W - .raw•<..•a,r._..,..,.. ono .I/morn e•,: ,..Si �I .a i,tuw r yea ...ai.iw-.-.'"+•o�..vw P'•�`�`ian wow wV..+ �� w Mna.rrrt. _ II 1 MONUMENT SIGNS I.j r�fj/�)] L etreget Lbr0t2t rpg t•e11 LeCAT elaeo n1 The NLLe1 111204r • Y V, Lot a 51 „ ' -- MOW,eCTtA moo DP oaG Arlo al iton.r6 l� FofFIUS. LI•NTItia aNu4.to a1N[TDD IN&la JL a` rutn,.uo PPP nepetlw J.V. •C ,�,1 RD No.a star W f. -we . 31xNNeN; 20 As fbr RJ_wvpnetT Arre 1"'Axlscri(f / .aalterree NrtzN I Lto(p Mtat. I•. 4°°.aa w -"Pit rKDPBRICp. 17 11v.DT.Lit t.7K,(83 L41 0 G I. k L45S IC I' �ii a 2. ,,....O US[ eat Tilt an O.Ito DC(rLics ' ' o WrcN rotator use eat rlarxTs K9batlaacTtiN"- R.J.mei r tk.rty,A•12 . _ V 1 El - A t ryfa Rivlad(ewu� ars nlerntt tw rem or(or _ • -'- 111JI(o EfD•.!t."1 wtv . . .. .. �!•' ,....7 J La•,MP 1 �' 4•e-aa r4 _..,Ialm.v 8.mo•1 Acrea NTTIe KJ.PAvet(eU �,t•1255,- .- /// //, ��tv.�De�y v...• V D„,„„,4ero on'Q'...Minot.7KrVSs.1T oJNP(.te545 ::.:�."^-.tin, / �2 .'TM g1.LL O4 wtwr1uo vele,w /\ Site Plan •-,t 4wo.,tort,etroe1ta-- \, �e ,1 f 4(p >;C,..:I-.40'-0- S•ultieke,Tax.14 OCT 98 VICIf♦IT{ 1 If4 �, , e I 1 �/ Lot LetoC.1 g/. t 2 lama ' La Ie,ebA 1 Let 4 woo, \ P.0'No'L,rj Lot... 1111 1 Dw.1I Gcr(,• c.o.WWI YO-)a • • 'nD No.11 ewe Lem - .ID vie.a der L•.. • 4f. 40.1111 .ee31 Lot.•elax l e n 4pM , 1 t,D Ne.a ewr.Lww\ —. 4lo-150 . ' • 0 .., 0 ' CORNOS Cr N i10-1 f • .5 rtnittivii...L.el i!rso :- —----—------— — ovizi1c=0.-ritecrKIG- 1.043 Alarl&TORN. , . rioracrr Lii. —iia ...--:.• L.71 71 _1 • . t • • Vlos,'te Arreerw.roe.; eas•es.5' . F.F ' --E 1 --- -- . . 1 • 111illiiiiIIIIIIIL) I '---- _--- 4 -1- • • i I , . .....„ • -.1 1 4111 "414111111 11 -1--- , , , • . i ...smog. gi.4 moog•Bod .. -- • 1 . •____ ___. .q eft E. RECD OCT 2 8 1996 I I gary wood arch II • 4------ . • 1 lt I— Miran Arlinst.en. itect40.714 017/5 t i I , r6eptliiie cam . Site Grading Plan *The Children's Courtyard SCALE,,..40.-iir Sotehlaks.Tons 14 OCT 46 ;10 A Child Development Center ,.., ... t. • I \ ,.• 1 \ q t_C- I cC"..) • ' ._ '"""I' "nizi,!!;!?i;iiti:iil,i',i':,',1:' • ';:••7 • _ . .. . I 0 I-as 0 1 t l' .. i 2 i 4 ..1.1q Ilk •-• (a/I 1 fin 11 Ilk l' 25' 5 _ 4'° rpm G. I III gel i MI .E.1 . :: i3.3 110\ i•ii 1 , -.:', rvisil • 0., & 2--( _. 14 4 ril __.:,:i lh . . - 1-47..1 4 '..] ,-. & tlij __ : emu , -, SE . Z.- ,, $ G. d . . le - 6101"11 a I .1. ri,-. . 1 •1 - .r.' Mii- 1 ..._-_ • • ill ) I , - .. —,NO I—...t. ..,-..."—,441 .' sip% t $ — '-g---4 3 1 i- .- lEfiej _ I&IF • 2I. M iiiii i 4 . 4110, • 4 . it s4 ._4—‘• I!, • PA _ • ie lig 1EL - !WAN i lin Ida t 431 13:z3.: _ t :I , III oe' i4 MO 1. q 5. ii ii 15" , 5.. 0 .,,, .1) 1 ,,-, „.1 , ..., ....,} 1... \ rt -.if . . A a..1 / .-..-.=: , v.' %I / 1 7'1'< -!.‘" 0 ( 1.: t'_ . , , / d i x ..-.-• •4 i te_ '": 7 fz. IS' 021 I' :ri •,_ Imp . i 11 rdi-k 0 m, RED OCT 2 8 1:--2S 1 — z*ftg"The Children's Courtyard aiy wood architect 9 (-f, r A Chtld Development Center 1 0 * • 904 C.Abram Awl...or,mmmmmmmmmmm 1.-071. S CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ;ORDINANCENO:`.;480=225 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 3 207m ACRES-SITUATEDWIN:`THE"WTJJ 'WEN'ST.JRVEY,;ABSTRACTN0. 1;255;TRACTS`1A TITIA1, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM 'AG"WAGRICULTURM DISTRICT;TO r"S P=T"DETAILED-SITE`PWDISTRICT°WITH• .LOCAL RETAt11.WCOIVINIERCIAL-DISTRICT:4USE5 1IMITED'-TO DAY NURSE1 JESWONLY AND ADDING PRIVATE KINDERGARTEN USES, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS • ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING•FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND . PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 'WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of • buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as 17.A:G"`Agti ii1tuial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person •or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by L:\CTYDO C S\ORD\CAS ES\480-225.SP 1 Page 1 8B-Ff. illthe City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the . concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage,•schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of•the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among • other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view . to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, • WHEREAS,.the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public • necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly • • requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those . who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed•at the time their original investment was made; and, • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City.of Southlake, Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- . crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision .• . of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, . • " WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been . . • a change in the conditions of the property.surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts • . of land requested fora change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City •of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-225.SP 1 Page 2 8B_g0 • • . Being a 3.207"acre tract of land situated in ther1Z:J.-PaderiMSuivey``;'Al str"acf" To? 1255",Traet"s-TA and-1Alj, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein,fromr"A-G"-Ag"ricultural-Disfriet to"S-P4"3 Detai led"Site Plan Distild With-"C=2"'Local"Retail Ccimmeicial:District uses liiriited. to day nurseries_Only"and-adding private:kindergaften-iises, as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. -- Section 4. That " the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to.prevent.over-crowding of land; • . •to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a.full and complete hearing with reasonable • consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the • particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance"shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions.of said ordinances . except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct-conflict with the. provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms. and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid;.the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. . Section 7. Any person;firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or . refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 0 Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-225.SP1 . Page 3 8B oZl illsuch accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted . until final disposition by the courts. ' Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City .. newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR 41) ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of. • , 1997. MAYOR S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-225.SP 1 Page 4 8P Aa • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: •EFFECTIVE: • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-225.SP 1 Page 5 8B 33 EXHIBIT "A" • BEGINNING at an iron rod found at the northeast corner of Lot 1. Block 1, Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Carroll, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat 'recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No. 1460, Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texts, said iron being in the south line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and also being in the common property line between the Stone and Pinson tracts, according to the Boundary Agreement recorded in Volume 9287, Page 1,968. Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89' 27' 18" E with the south line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), 125.61 feet I,, 'to an iron rod set for corner; I I I THENCE S 0' 01' 36" E 608.33 feet to on iron rod set in the west line of Stone Lakes — Phase I One, an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County, Texas, according to the, plat recorded . in Cabinet A, Slide No. 915 and 916•, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; j THENCE S 89' 33' 55" W with the west line of Stone Lakes — Phase One, 125.67 feet to on iron rod found in the east line of Lot 1,- Block 1, Carroll High School Addition.•said iron being in the common line of the Stone. and Pinson tracts, according to the said Boundary Agreement, and the agreed west line of the Pinson tract; THENCE N 0' 01' 14" W with the east line of Carroll High School Addition 608.09 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 1.754 acres (76,412) square feet of land. t BEGINNING at an iron rod found at the most northerly northwest corner of Stone Lakes — Phase One, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded 40 in Cabinet A. Slide No. 915 and 916. Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas, said iron being in the south line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709); THENCE S 0' 01' 36" E with the west line of Stone Lakes — Phase One, 608.53 feet to an iron rod found for corner; - THENCE S 89' 33' 55" W with the west line of Stone Lakes — Phase One, 103.99 feet to an iron rod set for corner; THENCE N 0' 01' 36" W 608.33 feet to -an iron rod set in the south line of Southlake 1 • Boulevard (F.M. 1709) for corner; THENCE N 89' 27' 18" E with the south line of.Southloke Boulevard (F.M. 1709) 103.99 feet i to the Place of Beginning, containing 1.453 acres (63,271 square feet).of land. I 1 . • III • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-225.SP1 ' Page 6 8B-Al C 1.r CM brood C., ••'•••til•L... . . 1y w.1 e..,.•n' a.�a1 e.•...wi ww•n•.•aa.u•• y t i -11 R,re4ARTg1ART•eaTlteTARa. r•..aW Lb•••1'•• I_- Iw.wao.•rty Miswui • Proposed TonMg-'6-P-I•with vatted'C-2°usesD.,. -TM-A.,. IN.. ......... _- - Land lima • D.algnatlon-Ttadwn Pavony Ra.Idanllal• 1.... t� •�' ' 1. .r�r -- -- -- • 1 ...Im Tom .1t Arise of Open Space Tapp.(.pa roo,.fJ nr•rr 1110 1 percenleq en 6peu Tapprox. 61.94%! r• •...r IV r..n u n w VI Am r ^"•.° Eattmel .tructlon March I,1975 r. r+•1 p. w•n . N w_FM.CD n B T E.11mel car.lnlctlon Dao.91,N55. ti, a...� OR T•• • n w APP••x wr..py'...ta•M L •t+w',P. dMaximum Dldg. i -20l (kTi1,L KH3'r IS) .....• _ .ounaw etw.r.rt MN en , O Maximum No.or rhtldran- 680 •w..r....r..r•awr•.rr Mr I•CA11A•p At p•na r' _ _ ...i• �1•"..•.+.. + �. • Requred Parking- 96o cMaordl+ S er/c�lno• la a�tcts I. .,.•° i ••••••ti•r......rrrdr+•tn.-rrr.u•• 1 Rw•rr.■ n.s. a /� __ O `.:M:rr.rm.r��.rr,.+••.r••••rwrron 7 t/�,/I i/////%/ provided Parkle2-6`Ttanderd,Handicap,Total t r..a+ar••r.....•.er..-- �./. P2t : rww..p+ CI Required Loading 6paCM-2 (1d•5J) ' � tart Lot tewa., n R de.ovld Loading 6paca.-2 _ .urrrt1101411T•urtwRwroxarc ito --•___ N`�� It .aw+...p.,r).v. •y r•r..•. L....... .I..• CIA,T.• Ammar. N. ...Id. / \� .RO No.,OM*LA. Cn Qat Raattex venture.,Inc. 1.... moo ... e.1U A.Y. l�\\\ •. boJ) 17 ■w.•r Kb, IN it t• in fro • .•a..w�vaa�.a'r u. / VI 1675 Wmbledon Drive rw•w .a ao•t.w,. Cr1 Arlington,Texas 16011 n...r.rr•+,,.r•+r� P., r / - (611)164-9941 Fax:(611)466-9521 ,,emee • .utrauo 14 �-- `"r" N LA Confect,Mr.Jim Mills _ '� bArchitect!.Gary Wood arcr ltea 'MCI. lA, R.J.P/oeN St1�t(l t-1255 IV tee E.Abram breed. •... 4 r• a a r•w ...w•r.wr ^•". ` / sow+w 1,0p•niw iv. �:ii.'.4 ..44..... .....4.+ir•'w�i •��'r••1ti ^ 'ro w.r Mo.Loo• ` Arll ton,Texas 16010 �..r"9r•.... :"w.ram°-•�7.sr r••+�L'r.':•• j1 \ lea» T611 54-9941 Fat,C611)466.9971 +~ il NO. .r w MI' I r sr s6.,.t1F�.. —\ Contac4 Mr,Gay Woodco �•'".�w..i'.tt.1.•.+r.wr-- -p.mein.wffn v No,Nos — .t�XL l.tLb ARFJ4- 1 )- .•••OM`^ ;^... : :.:'"'..:: O.) 9.10 Jc11t5 i39,6153 ye.Sa ••m !• LA%510., ,— ti�i.'w•.i4'�•.i.I Fi fro •r•wrY. ^� �� •t bM,LWD.T Tara Ctlllgf♦6 eRL'X 201900 5r ••..^r.+` `.:".. 4 � .ow*A. ���� W wow.,.om1.4. OCT �4.eo•e.........o...v......"...... iY \ / T 6� M r•+..-+.,.e.....m.n1 w•.+.... 1gn. .w\ Isr\ Y .' W • lt PI .Truer 1A d; R.J.PXo011 5 5de(,t-1255 .uw•r.r.R••n. t/!�• ^ r.. ,a '"...-: ,.• 1 I.-. 00 t �.a t �..� �..w._„•w.. __ _ • t 1 1, � � �1 I► I I l 1 IC- ==911111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllll111 • �' ----. wr1k�`W_�_�RUN � N � �., �_��i Lot M.MAN., }QylVSIo KCt " '..• MD Mo.1w in•.ma Ow damn ,..... _ _ ::IS..sI�'tert...w.....r.....w,_ wMr 1 1. MONUMENT SIGN lrol rts . . �G{a rt(rY`jJttf t...areal 1. I:valet I.IG rn4P1$lecata0 al Tee NAa1.rrJurllal�b -• ! rut..,.. 1 G ww. mamma,.v. __ bti110 DRFlarR 6 of ptOlk'..•,r 01f1oe>is ell V• RD w.T.N.••L/w• comm. wens&elite.re=Imo cat eeo t A • /1\ -wlr'.. -wa > �u tta T6_roeeleetT X�Gr'tolfcsltl �aNaxl, 1r1 ..e» tr I• c 2. iIl{'E1beo i46t Tt1E arts u•RR cat 1L)eele( • R•./mai atrit(.A-1251 .. U 1 1131111...... — A r TtAl161i fist Is1. t'R•otrs KWKcrf oi 11 ) 1 r it -'>m= a A{'Fs tt'a r 47 IcdrIOlt dbTXtLto ►ue qt'f erV "'��,,��'�� _ *o6(Ht.tl� efGlrlrMolls % L. _——\_.: .—..7_'.J / `a;w'�°u.'. �, I"si^J te�.ee{(� %//.� ..• U ,mlA•,n� 6.eo1 /61m M TND R•1 rNe1tY u71,4CS�1s75 a`•• -•. / NIAN� t9•rth' 41Y cf ao11IML+M1e.'D•ftlWh' - ••.•.'^A. T \j/.'SNa c11LOReNy au1N'o \ Lw,,E...." j..:PAQ,....4 �, Site Plan •-A callO.e•eL•rNear - .111,N I \ ,NA. ..Av., SCAtt,1-.40•-rl SoutMek..Taro.14 OCT fa Lwaewn row.,...LA. VICitiIT{ MAP ur.ew,CIooroo May.woo .wor � .•1 wn..,i,w.t.•.. - Ro w.r n..L.•.. Lw we.•s+ te o'" q1,o-150 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT January 3, 1997 r CASE NO: ZA 96-124 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-219, First Reading Rezoning and Concept Plan/Crestwood Office Park STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for property described as being approximately 3.5083 acres situated in the W. W. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 695, being a portion of Tract 3D as recorded in Volume 8564, Page 285, D.R.T.C.T. This plan proposes two (2) individual office buildings. LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of North Carroll Ave. and Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 7109) OWNER: CFNVESTS Southlake JV APPLICANT: M&M Group, Inc. 411JRRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District • REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) • CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: '-Residential Areas (Any Single Family district) NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: One response was received within the 200' notification area: Juergen Strunck, P.O. Box 92685, Southlake, opposed. I am opposed ... "until some of my questions concerning this request have been satisfactorily clarified." See attached letter. P&Z ACTION: October 3, 1996;Approved(6-0)applicant's request to table until the November 7, 1996 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting. November 7, 1996;Approved(4-2)subject to Plan Review Summary 41) No. 2 dated November 1, 1996 deleting Item #1 (provide a 50' building setback line)to allow a 40' setback line; deleting Item#3A (driveway spacing distances);amending Item#3B("right-in/right-out 8A-1 only" driveway)to allow a"right-in/right-out/left-out" driveway on Carroll Ave.; deleting Item#3C(minimum driveway throat depth on • Carroll Ave.);adding to delete 10 parking spaces and use pavers for 20 of the remaining parking spaces; accepting the applicant's commitment to provide an 8' stockade fence with shadow box along the north property line. COUNCIL ACTION: November 19, 1996; Approved (6-0) Applicant's request to table until the December 3, 1996 City Council meeting. December 3, 1996; Approved(7-0) applicant's request to table until the December 17, 1996 City Council meeting. December 17, 1996;Approved(7-0)applicant's request to table until the January 7, 1997 City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated September 27, 1996 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated November 1, 1996,with the exception of the items in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated November 15, 1996. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-124ZC.WPD • 4110 • 8A-2 Juergen Strunck S P.O.Box 92685 Southlake,TX 76092 (817) 481-3681 October 1, 1996 Chairman and Members of the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Reference No. ZA 94-124 Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission: STom Matthews and David McMahan visited with me about two weeks ago and presented me with their concept plan for the proposed Crestwood Office Park. They told me at that time that they would request a zoning change to SP-2 with exclusive 0-1 usage. The notice I received from the city of Southlake lists only SP-2 generalized site plan district. I have to oppose this without the 0-1 office use specification. This may just be this may simply be a matter of weak communication—but I take the notice as the legally binding document for me. We looked at the plan and I had no serious concerns other than the placement of a two story building at a very high location looking directly into my living room. Both ' gentlemen understood my concerns and gave parking problems as the main reason for the distribution of the building heights. I trust and hope that this can be modified. We also talked about the exact location of the buildings in relation to the large oak trees on the property. I was assured that a tree survey would be conducted and a more accurate location of the building and parking spaces would be shown to me. I assumed this would happen and would be incorporated in the concept plan prior to submission to you. From conversation concerning the rezoning request with Ms. Gandy I understand that the West corner of Carroll Ave. and.Southlake Blvd. may not yet be legally included in the zoning change request and concept plan. To my mind the concept plan and with it the zoning change request hinges on the resolution of this issue. Again, this may just be a matter of failed communication. But I certainly would want to know that M&M Group can plan the construction at the corner and that the design of the straightening of N. Carroll Ave. is approved and meets all the requirements of the City of Southlake and affected property owners. S 1996RECD OCT C2 8A-3 { As the homeowner most directly concerned with this request for the zoning change I am • obviously most careful to state my views concerning this request. I told Mr. Matthews and McMahan that I did not object to having the parking lots all near our property line since this would take less soil removal for the construction of their buildings and would save more trees on their property. I appreciated their visit with me and their expressed intent to work with me to reach mutually agreeable solutions to their desire to build fine quality office spaces in the Crestwood Office Park. Given a little more time and more detailed information concerning the points raised above (as well as"normal"questions such as building design, landscaping, lights, trash bin location) I think that my opposition to the request can be changed to no opposition. Mr. Matthews and McMahan probably expected to see me at your meeting to clarify my concerns. I am sorry to note that professional commitments do not permit me to attend your meeting. This may explain my rather lengthy letter. I will try to get a copy of the minutes for your Oct. 3 meeting and hope to be able to attend the 2nd reading or any pertinent follow-up-meetings. Thank you for your consideration on my behalf on this matter! Sincerely, •i /,/ te ‘.0-87011/ S • • 8A-4 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT January 3, 1997 °CASE NO: ZA 96-90 PROJECT: First Reading/Ordinance No. 480-211 Rezoning and Concept Plan - Shady Oak Centre (Submitted as Southlake Professional Plaza) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Shady Oak Centre, being approximately 2.95 acres situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 2C,as recorded in Volume 8374,Page 2186,Deed Records,Tarrant County, Texas. LOCATION: 521 W. Southlake Blvd., south of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) OWNER: Marvin C. Kennedy APPLICANT: Larry D. Flynn •URRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District AMENDED ZONING REQUEST: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with certain "0-1" uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential (may include residential and limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Residential (any Single Family district) NO.NOTICES SENT: Twenty-one(21) RESPONSES: Fourteen(14)written responses were received within the 200'notification area. • Steven and Kathy Sims, 101 Springbrook Ct., Southlake, Texas, opposed. "The granting of "0-1" Office District zoning next to Timber Lake and Lake Crest will be detrimental to residential property values in those neighborhoods. The developer is proposing ® driveways and parking withing 10 feet of residential property owners." See attached letter. 8C 1 \ • Michael and Cindy Conrad, 108 Springbrook Court, Southlake, • Texas, opposed. "Land use plan stipulates medium density residential not 0-1. Traffic,noise, and night security. Alternatives within 200' yards that will not impact my property value." • Marlene Massa, 104 Springbrook Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Too close to residential resulting in property value loss." • Tom Jacobowski, 107 Springbrook Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Should be residential per SL land use plan. Detrimental to my residential property value. Too close to residential property, poor site. There are much better ways to use this property." • Candace and Daniel Altena, Springbrook Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "The proposed building is too large-3200+square feet and will be a nuisance. The city stated when we bought our home that the property was to be residential. The cities land use plan specifies that this area is medium density residential. The complex violates the cities own land use plan." • Judy and Stephan Largent, 215 Timber Lake Way, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Too large a building too close to residences creating excessive noise,traffic and security problems to established residential neighborhoods." • Julie Hale, 102 Springbrook Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "(1)The'32,000 sq ft' space is 100 yds from my front yard, (2)do not want to live on an office buildings parking lot. (3) Our • property value would suffer. (4) We are offended that Southlake is even considering this so close to our housing development. (5) The area shaded on back is our home. Would you appreciate this?" • Kevin Barlow, 206 Canyon Lake Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Too close to residential, too big, detrimental to our land value." • May Pogozelski and Lawrence Cheung, 202 Canyon Lake Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Too much noise, the proposed building is too large; additional traffic; devaluation on my house; conflict with land use plan; loss of privacy." • Southlake Joint Venture, David Howell, 15851 Dallas Parkway, Suite 100, Dallas, Texas, opposed. "Homeowners called and they would like us to join their opposition. They want additional restrictions,etc.' that straight "0-1" doesn't offer." See attached letter. • Dennis Checkley, 217 Timber Lake Way, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "The building is too large and the traffic pattern would cause too much noise for surrounding neighbors. A small configuration of buildings would be a better option." • Christopher & Diana Hennessy, 204 Canyon Lake Dr, Southlake, • Texas, opposed. "We are opposed to the zoning change because it would allow for development which would be too large for a residential area. It would also cause too much noise and traffic and be detrimental to our land value." 8C-2 1 • Terri McGuire Watson, 106 Springbrook Southlake, Texas, opposed. • • Tom Hasker, 219 Timber Lake Way, Southlake, Texas, opposed. Six (6)written responses were received outside the 200'notification area: • R.M. and Janet Kendall, 203 Canyon Lake Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Too close to residential subdivision property devaluation, traffic, and noise." • Richard L. Ebel, 111 Woodglen Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "The proposed development will require a wider, offset intersection at Shady Oaks Drive and FM 1709 (soon to have a stoplight?) causing increased traffic congestion and dangerous traffic conditions." Attached letter identical to Mr. Conrad's. • Michael R. Baldwin, Lakecrest Homeowners Association, Board Member, opposed. "Increased traffic and a two story building so close to residence." • Warren Anderson, Lakecrest Homeowners Association, Director, opposed. "The proposal for rezoning is in conflict with the Land Use Plan. A building of this size will increase the traffic on FM 1709." Attached letter identical to Mr. Conrad's. • Paul Guisinger, 808 Ridgedale Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "The application contains a proposed development of a High Density Office Building with a driveway (noise and traffic), parking and • security lighting only ten feet from Timber Lake yards." See attached letter. • Michael Conrads, Southlake Impacted Homeowners, 108 Springbrook Court, Southlake, opposed. Organization has drafted "requirements" for consideration. See attached letters after Staff Report. A petition was received with 127 signatures total,all in opposition. Nine (9)of the petitioners are within the 200'notification area. The remaining 113 petitioners are outside the 200' notification area. The following are reasons for opposition cited by the petition:' • "The property is classified as Medium Density Residential in the Land Use Plan and the residents of Timber Lake Crest were assured that the property in question would be developed for residences in keeping with the existing neighborhoods." • "The application contains a proposed development of a high density office building with a driveway (noise and traffic), parking and security lighting ten feet from our back yards." See attached petition. A petition was received with 671 signatures total, all in opposition. Sixteen(16)of the petitioners are within the 200'notification area. The remaining 656 petitioners are outside the 200' notification area. The following arereasons for opposition cited by the petition: 8C-3 • "The construction of an office building of this size, in addition to the • substantial commercial development approved for the intersection of Shady Oaks and FM 1709, would result in increased traffic congestion and dangerous traffic conditions." • "The granting of"0-1" Office District zoning next to Timber Lake and Lake Crest will be detrimental to residential property values in those neighborhoods." P &Z ACTION: August 8, 1996;Approved(7-0)to table to the August 22, 1996 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting. August 22, 1996; Approved (7-0) to table to the September 5, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. September 5, 1996;Approved(7-0) applicant's request to table until the September 19, 1996 Planning&Zoning Commission. - September 19, 1996;Approved(7-0)applicant's request to table until the November 7, 1996 Planning&Zoning Commission. November 7, 1996;Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. • November 14, 1996; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the November 21, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. November 21, 1996;Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. December 5, 1996; Approved (5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated November 1, 1996, and incorporating Impacted Homeowners document Revised November 21, 1996 and received November 27, 1996 amending as follows: Item #1 (Permitted Uses) adding "currently adopted" to precede "City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance"in the first sentence, add"(See attachment of permitted uses) following the last sentence and attach to the Impacted Homeowners document the listing of "0-1" permitted uses of the current Zoning' Ordinance No. 480, striking out uses to be eliminated; Item #4(Roof Design) delete the second and third sentence and add"Roof to match or be greater than the pitch of Dr. Huckabee's office building and must be of composition shingles"; Item #5 (Masonry Wall) delete "in masonry appearance"and add in its place"the solid portion of'; Item#7(Parking) adding "currently adopted" to precede "City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance" in the first sentence, delete"in effect during 1996" and add "in no event be more than"preceding "90 parking spaces"; Item#9(3) (trash containers/receptacles)delete in its entirety(" . . . hidden from view • from all adjacent homeowners' properties and travelers on.F.M. 1709"); Item#10, (satellite dishes) delete ". . . second story view" and add " . . 8C-4 .Satellite dishes shall be ground mounted and shall be screened to height equal to or greater than the dish";Item#11 (site plan requirements)delete • ". . .and placed as appropriate to the tree type so as to ensure "full screening" coverage as seen by residential property owners from their second story windows. An additional buffer of one (1) canopy tree and six (6) large (6' - 10") shrubs to be planted and maintained between the northwest parking spaces and residential property line;" and add "The minimum caliper of trees shall be 3" with placement to be determined at the time of site plan approval"; Item#13 (signs) delete ". . . so as to be non-offensive to neighboring homeowners"; Item #14 (future development or additions) delete in its entirety. Applicant allowed to reserve the right to modify drive location and building on the site plan. COUNCIL ACTION: December 17, 1996;Approved(7-0)applicant's request to table until the January 7, 1997 City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the items in the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated August 16, 1996 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated November 1, 1996 with the exception of those items in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated December 13, 1996. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-090ZC.WPD • • 8C-5 Texas Land & Building Company , LLC Daniel L. Deichert President • October 22, 1996 - Mr.Dennis Killough City of Southlake • - 667 North Carroll Southlake,Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Killough: Enclosed is our revised submittal for zoning case#ZA 96-90,now named Shady Oak Centre.This plan is a result of several meetings with homeowners from the Timber Lake and Lake Crest subdivisions, collectively known as the Southlake Impacted Homeowners. Together,we have planned this parcel to minimize the impact of the two proposed buildings on adjacent and surrounding homes.As a supplement to the plan transmitted today,we have agreed upon a set of property restrictions which deal with issues ranging from hours of operation to building design. We request the attached list of property restrictions be included as stipulations for approval of the zoning case and that these restrictions be included as part of any approved zoning. ® We understand that as part.of the S-P-2 zoning classification,further plan approvals will be required. Any future submittals will be approved by the Southlake Impacted Homeowners prior to delivery to the city and such submittals will be in accordance with the property restrictions unless waiver has been • granted by Southlake Impacted Homeowners. Thank you for your patience. - Sincerely, • 64 2 Daniel L.Deichert President • cc: Mr.Michael Conrads- Southlake Impacted HomeownersriA Campbell Centre 8150 N Central Expwy RE AGTsF Texas 75208 11� f p: 214.892.TLHC (8522) f: 214.892.8545 e: tlbc@onramp.net 8C-6 f • ' Impacted Homeowners' Requirements For Rezoning ` Revised 11/21/46 c Hiram Granberry Survey,Abstract No.581,Tract 2C 1 Volume 8374,Page 2186,Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas ` r The following requirements and uses are clearly defined and are enforceable now and in the future as part of the S-P-2 rezoning submission for this property. Site Plans include:the actual landscape plan,elevation views from front, side and back and clearly o identified renderings to scale of the following site plan requirements; C.vrrcn+i) ado1Y ed 1. 0-1, "Office District"permitted uses as stated in theEity of Southlake Zoning Ordinance n.asc during 1996 with the removal of the following high traffic uses:Banking, Savings and Loan,Duplication and Mailing Services,Employment Services,Radio Recording and Television Broadcasting,Travel Bureaus or services,Real Estate, Bill Pa nng Services,and . Community Facility Uses:Libraries,.City Halls, Fire-arid Police Stations, and other municipal uses; (See . -1-1- Gl mcnt tc perm%+I'Eci U 5c S) 2. Only two(2)single story buildings will be erected on this site. The building to the west(closest to FM 1709).will face to the east,not to exceed 7,400 s.f., and will be placed a minimum of 45 feet from the west property line. The building to the (o south will face to the north,will not exceed 11,800 s.f., and will be placed at least 100 feet from the south property line. The F V peaks of the buildings shall not exceed 23 feet in height; c 3. The maximum height of any structure to be 23 feet including the peak of the roof; f f t b • , „n tr to •o the nd ac nt-business Reof conSkrudd"tor) rn1Us rrlt-c 4. Building elevation includes roof design, Gonst� ���-w�. t-sight-li140-8l�-b Ib� 3 rc atcr than the ' -I-he sold porfm on of pitci dh rig n of Dr. � ockabcc's cf� � d rc}Ost- be a c-? 5. A solid 8'tall masonry wall matching' Timber Lake's existing wall to be constructed within 60 C. 0 rn dos i t,o n 5 h i ni l es• e= days of ground breaking along the south and west property lines. z O t 6. No rear of building vehicle access. No impervious material to be constructed in these areas; , c CO CO . . • • • r N . J r ..c ,. 1-- a . i N l: [mpacted fomeowners'Requirements For Rezoning-Revised 11/21/96 page 2 N Hiram Granberry.Slimy,Abstract No.581,Tract 2C Volume 8374,Page 2126,Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas , m U3 - N currently adap4eci °' Ln 7. Parking will not exceed the minimum requirements of thetCity of Southlake Zoning Ordinances {�-effee 6 or in n 6 e ue n4 k more +h'n 90 parking spaces, whichever is fewer and all parking spaces will be placed a minimum of 70 feet from residential property lines; 8. All building utilities and equipment appropriately concealed behind solid masonry walls; 00 9. Trash containers/receptacles for the development to be(1)placed along the east-northeast property line and away from (� residential property;(2)contained within a masonry wall with a closing wooden gate, and;"`be hi Iden from .icw- 00 adjacent{•nrnwn2•n ern'pr•pertie- n tr ele _ .F\S 1709;_ r" r 03 ' C) 10. No satellite dish to be placed on the property over 6'in diameter and must be screened from residential property. 3ccond mew; Sa+el(+ dishes sh -o a shalt be ground-moon+ea and 11 be 5crcened -1 1 ►.gh+ equ�-r I o r 9r'eafer +ha n m -I-he dih. . • 11. The site plan must include a detailed landscape plan as an addendum and must specify and quantify the landscape plantings while clearly depicting their placement on the site plan. In addition to the Bufferyard F-1 requirements the developer will add Bufferyard C planting with a minimum of 5 canopy trees per 100'run as well as change Bufferyard&I planting to Bufferyard P planting. We emphasize:The areas to the west and south of the two buildings will be-heavily landscaped with a minimum of five(5)large canopy trees per 100 feet pandplaeed-es-ap ate-to-the-tree-type-se-as•- additional- buffer of one(1)canopy tree and six(6)lag,e(6'-10')bluubs to be planted and maintained between they northwest parking The minimum caliper of 4rees shall be 3 wrA placernen+ 40 b, de}Lc mined a1- the- fine of site elan approval. 12. Exterior lighting will be for security lighting purposes only and will be placed in such a manner to be directed toward the .e non-residential buildings and must not"spill over"on to the adjoining Homeowners'property. All rear building security m m . w lights must include motion sensors to minimize their utilization to reduce light pollution for the residential property owners; 13. All outdoor business signs will be in compliance with the City of Southlake's sign Ordinances. Only monument signs will be constructed with minimized lightin4so sa to be no • 1 e-futu evelepment-er-additiens-te-the-privet►itheut-full-Welkerion-arid At-brt aeted-1 derneesvneFs-as-- - - c c • 00 n C • • • • • G 11 Y C 0-1 OFFICE DISTRICT O RMITTED USES a. Office Uses 1. Accounting and tax preparation; 2. Adjustment and collection services; 3. Advertising agencies; 4. Architecture; 5. Banking; 6. Billpaying scrviccs; 7. Business corporate headquarters(when used for office purposes only); 8. Business holding and investment services; ® 9. Chamber of Commerce; 10. Chiropractors; 11. Computer services; 12. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting; 13. Contractors offices(provided no outside storage or display is permitted); 14. Dentists; 15. Duplication and mailing 3crviccs; 16. Employmcnt scrviccs; 17. Engineering; 18. Finance; 19. Interior design; III 8C-10 I, 20. Land surveying; • 21. Law; 22. Management consultants; 23. Optometrists; 24. Other offices of a business and/or professional nature providing services not including the retail sale,fabrication, manufacture or production of goods°or merchandise. 25. Physicians; 26. Podiatrists; 27. Psychiatrists; 28. Psychologists; 30. Real estate and insurance; 31. Savings and Loan; 32. Securities and commodities brokers,dealers,underwriters and exchange offices; 33. Stenographic services; 34. Title companies; 35. Travel bureaus or services; 36. Utility offices; • b. Community Facility Uses 1. Public, semi-public and private parks; 2. Recreation and open space to include playgrounds, parkways, greenbelts, ponds and lakes,botanical gardens,pedestrian paths,bicycle paths,equestrian bridal trails,nature enters,and bird and wildlife sanctuaries; S 8C-11 3. Librarics; • 47--C ity halls, firc and police s , and 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character. ACCESSORY USES -In addition to those accessory uses specifically authorized in Section 34 of this ordinance,any use may be established as an accessory use to a permitted use when it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. SPECIFIC USE PERMITS - Specific use permits may be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission as specifically authorized in Section 45 of this ordinance, subject to full and complete compliance with any and all conditions required in Section 45,together with any other conditions as the City Council may impose. Any use accessory to an approved specific use permit shall be permitted without specific approval if it complies with the conditions for an accessory use as defined in this ordinance. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-C.) S • 8C-12 Impacted Homeowners' Requirements for Rezoning 2nd Revision - 10/20/96 Hiram Granberry Survey,Abstract No. 581,Tract 2C Volume 8374,Page 2186,Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas Change the 0-1 to S-P-1 Zoning request with the following requirements and uses clearly defined. Concept Plans to be redrawn as Site Plans to include:the actual landscape plan, elevation views from front, side and back and clearly identified renderings to scale of the following site plan requirements; • 0-1,"Office District"permitted uses as stated in the Zoning Ordinance with the removal of the following high traffic uses: Banking, Savings and Loan,Duplication and Mailing Services, Employment Services,Radio Recording and Television Broadcasting,Travel Bureaus or services,Real Estate, Bill Paying Services, and Community Facility Uses: Libraries, City Halls, Fire and Police Stations and other municipal uses; • Only two (2) single story buildings will be erected on this site. The building to the west (closest to FM 1709)will face to the east,not to exceed 7,400 sf. and will be placed a minimum of 45 feet from the west property line. The building to the south will face to • the north,will not exceed 11,800 sf.,and will be placed at least 100 feet from the south property line; • A solid 8' masonry wall* matching in masonry appearance Timber Lake's existing wall to be constructed within 60 days of ground breaking along the south and west property lines. The process to handle existing property owner fencing for the building of the wall as well as the method of joining all existing fences to the wall must be stated in writing. All changes to existing fencing will be at developer expense and completed to existing fence owner satisfaction. In the placement of this wall, all efforts will be made to avoid damaging or removing larger, established trees on residential property but may"share" the property line. The developer will replace, at their expense,any trees destroyed or removed in this process with residential property owner approved replacement(s); *Note, You have proposed a structural option to the 8'wall which is under consideration but has not been agreed to at this time and therefore,the 8'wall remains in our requirements. • The developer will work with the adjacent residential homeowners and the adjacent non- residential property owner prior to final site plan submission to replace existing wooden fences with appropriate,agreed upon 8' solid masonry wall along the east property line; • 1 REC'D OCT 2 21996 8C-13 • Impacted Homeowners' Requirements For Rezoning 2nd Revision 10/20/96 Hiram Granberry Survey,Abstract No. 581,Tract 2C Volume 8374,Page 2186,Deed Records, Tarrant County,Texas • Although not in complete control and,therefore,the outcome unsure,the developer will work with the adjacent non-residential property owner in order to remove their existing wooden fences along the adjoining south property line and replace with significant landscaping so as to portray the two developments as one; • Parking will not exceed the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance or 90 parking spaces,whichever is fewer and all parking spaces will•be placed a minimum of 60 feet from residential property lines; • Building elevation to include roof design. Construction of roof must be conducive to the adjacent residential community and similar in construction to the adjacent business office. Note: you agreed that the 11,800 sf. building will have multiple roof elevations to avoid a single, straight site line along the peak of the roof. We have also requested this same design for the smaller building if possible. As stated previously, flat roofs are unacceptable; • • The maximum height of any structure to be 22 feet; • No satellite dish to be placed on the property over 6' in diameter and must be screened from residential property view; • Restrict business hours of operation to: Weekdays from 8:00 a.m.to 8:00 p.m., Saturdays from 8:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m. and Sundays from 12 noon to 6:00 p.m. and must be stated as such on the site plan(there is precedent on this point); • The areas to the west and south of the two buildings will be heavily landscaped with a minimum of 5 large trees per 100 feet along the west and south property line and placed as appropriate to the tree type so as to ensure full"screening"coverage as seen by residential property owners from their second story windows(emphasis on larger trees). No rear of building vehicle access. No impervious material to be constructed in these areas; • All building utilities and equipment appropriately concealed behind solid masonry walls (landscaping is unacceptable); • 2 REED OCT p 2 iggc 8C-14 Impacted Homeowners' Requirements For Rezoning Revised 10/20/96 ® Hiram Granberry Survey,Abstract No. 581,Tract 2C Volume 8374,Page 2186,Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas • • Tree and shrub plantings should be used throughout the property. The site plan must include a detailed landscape plan as an addendum and must specify and quantify the landscape plantings while clearly depicting their placement on the site plan. In addition to the Bufferyard F-1 requirements the developer will add Bufferyard C planting as well as change Bufferyard M planting to Bufferyard P planting. Incremental trees and shrubs to be placed as an additional buffer between the northwest parking spaces and the residential property line; • Exterior lighting will be for security lighting purposes only and will be placed in such a manner to be directed to the non-residential buildings and must not"spill over"onto the adjoining Homeowners' property. All rear building security lights to include motion sensors to minimize their utilization and cut down on light pollution for the residential property owners; • Trash containers/receptacles for the development.to be(1)placed away from residential property as shown on the site plan dated 9/17/96; (2) contained within a masonry wall with closing wooden gate, and; (3)be hidden from view from all adjacent homeowners' properties and travelers on F.M. 1709. It is recommended to move the placement of the S "corral" further to the south and add additional parking that may be eliminated from the front of the development due to the 60 foot parking space proximity to residential property requirement; • For safety purposes,the driveway will be located directly across from the intersection of Shady Oaks and F.M. 1709**. Prior to final site plan submission to the Planning and Zoning Commission,the developer will contact both the appropriate City personnel and the adjacent non-residential property owner to pursue the connection of the parking lots to the east and closing off the existing driveway for safer access. The building to the west should be placed in such a manner as to allow for adequate throat depth and to provide for ease of traffic flow. Parking spaces will be minimized near the driveway entrance. **Note: A traffic light is anticipated at this intersection but a temporary entrance may be required until the light is installed. • All outdoor business signs will be in compliance with City Zoning Ordinances. Only monument signs will be constructed with minimized lighting so as to be non-offensive to neighboring homeowners; • No future development or additions to the property without full review and approval by the Impacted Homeowners. 3 REC'D OCT 2 21996 8C-15 Southlake Impacted Homeowners t! Michael C.Conrads-representative-108 Springbrook Court-Southlake,Texas 76092 Phone(214)716-8863-Fax(214)716-8826-Home Phone(817)329-3063 October 14, 1996 Daniel L. Deichert Texas Land and Building Company - LLC Campbell Center 8150 North Central Expressway#440 Dallas,Texas 75206 HOMEOWNERS REZONING REQUIREMENTS - REVISED Dear Mr. Deichert: Thank you for your response dated October 11, 1996 to our letter dated September 27, 1996 which outlined our concerns and requirements for the rezoning of the property at 521 W. ' Southlake Blvd., south of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and F.M. 1709 adjacent to Timber Lake and Lake Crest subdivisions. The impacted homeowners have had an opportunity to review Syour proposal and offer the following adjustments to our original requirements (see attached). Please note that the language is specific and therefore, we agree to adjust our requirements rather than accept your letter as the agreed upon resolution to'move forward with the development of this property. • To restate the process we mutually agreed to follow prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission presentation meeting: J • The rezoning request originally submitted for 0-1 will be changed to S-P-1 for the approximately 2.95 acres situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 2C,-as recorded in Volume 8374, Page 2186, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; • The S-P-1 rezoning request would stipulate the agreed upon Homeowners'requirements (see attachment); • The site plans would be redrawn with the agreed upon Homeowners' requirements clearly marked; • The site plans would include an elevation drawing with reference heights clearly indicated (existing adjacent property Professional building height marked, etc.); III RECD OCT 2 21996 1 , 8C-16 1 HOMEOWNERS REZONING REQUIREMENTS-REVISED page 2 40 • You will coordinate a mutually agreed upon meeting between the developers and the impacted . homeowners to review and approve the site plan changes and the S-P-1 rezoning request prior to submission to the City Of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission (Scheduled for Thursday - 10/17/96,7pm at 108 Springbrook Court-Timber Lake subdivision); • All communication to the City Of Southlake regarding this rezoning proposal will be copied or communicated to me as a representative of the impacted homeowners. • Thank you for your effort towards resolving our concerns and incorporating citizen input into your final site plan submission. To restate our position: We are not opposed to non-residential development on the property adjacent to our residential community, however, we firmly believe that any development should not adversely impact surrounding property values, but, rather, enhance them while contributing to our overall quality of life here in Southlake. Given agreement with our revised requirements and inclusion of them in the final site plan submission, we look forward to voicing our support for this development at the November Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 110 Sincerely, Michael C. Conrads Attachment cc: Impacted Homeowners City Of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission • City Of Southlake City Council Members S 8C-17 '• Impacted Homeowners' Requirements For Rezoning - Revised 10/14/96 Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581,Tract 2C Volume 8374, Page 2186, Deed Records,Tarrant County, Texas • Change the 0-1 to S-P-1 Zoning request with the following requirements and uses clearly defined. Concept Plans to be redrawn as Site Plans to include elevation views from front, side and back and clearly identified renderings to scale of the following site plan requirements; • 0-1, "Office District" permitted uses as stated in the Zoning Ordinance with the removal of the following high traffic uses: Banking, Savings and Loan, Duplication and Mailing Services, Employment Services, Radio Recording and Television Broadcasting, Travel Bureaus or services, Real Estate, Bill Paying Services, and Community Facility Uses: Libraries, City Halls, Fire and Police • Stations, and other municipal uses; • Only two (2) single story buildings will be erected on this site. The building to the west (closest to FM 1709) will face to the east, not to exceed 7,400 s.f., and will be placed a minimum of 45 feet from the west property line. The building to the south will face to the north, will not exceed 11,800 s.f., and will be placed at least 1111 100 feet from the south property line; • A solid 8' masonry wall matching in masonry appearance Timber Lake's existing wall to be constructed within 60 days of ground breaking along the south and west property lines. In the placement of this wall, all efforts will be made to avoid damaging or removing larger, established trees on residential property but may "share" the property line. The developer will replace, at their expense, any trees destroyed or removed in this process with residential property owner approved replacement(s). • The developer will work with the adjacent residential homeowners and the adjacent non-residential property owner prior to final site plan submission to replace existing wooden fences with appropriate, agreed upon 8' solid masonry wall along the east property line; • Although not in complete control and, therefore, the outcome unsure, the developer will work with the adjacent non-residential property owner in order to remove their existing wooden fences along the adjoining south property line and replace with significant landscaping so as to portray the two developments as one; • Parking will not exceed the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance or 90 parking spaces, whichever is fewer; • 8C-18 Impacted Homeowners' Requirements For Rezoning - Revised 10/14/96 page 2 Hiram Granberry Survey,Abstract No.581,Tract 2C Volume 8374,Page 2186,Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas •. Building elevation to include roof design. Construction of roof must be conducive to the adjacent residential community and similar in construction to the adjacent business office. Note: The 11,800 s.f. building is requested to have multiple roof elevations to avoid a single, straight sight line. Flat roofs are unacceptable; • Restrict hours of operation to weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and stated as such on the site plan (there is precedent on this point); - • The areas to the west and south of the two buildings will be heavily landscaped (emphasis on larger trees) with no rear of building vehicle access. No impervious material to be constructed in these areas; • All building utilities and equipment appropriately concealed behind solid masonry walls (landscaping is unacceptable); • Tree and shrub plantings should be used throughout the property. The site plan must quantify the landscape plantings while clearly depicting their placement on the site plan. In addition to the Bufferyard F-1 requirements the developer will add Bufferyard C planting as well as change Bufferyard M planting to Bufferyard P planting; • • Exterior lighting will be for security lighting purposes only and will be placed in such a manner to be directed to the non-residential buildings and must not "spill over" onto the adjoining Homeowners' property; • Trash containers/receptacles for the development to be (1) placed away from residential property as shown on the site plan dated 9/17/96; (2) contained within a masonry wall with closing wooden gate, and; (3) be hidden from view from all adjacent homeowners' properties and travelers on F.M. 1709; • For safety purposes, the driveway will be located directly across from the intersection of Shady Oaks and F.M. 1709*. Prior to final site plan submission to the Planning and Zoning Commission, the developer will contact both the appropriate City personnel and the adjacent non-residential property owner to pursue the connection of the parking lots to the east and closing off the existing driveway for safer access. The building to the west should be placed in such a manner as to allow for adequate throat depth and to provide for ease of traffic flow. Parking spaces will be minimized near the driveway entrance. (*Note: A traffic light is anticipated at this intersection but a temporary entrance may be required until the light is installed.) • All outdoor business signs will be in compliance with City Zoning Ordinances. Only monument signs will be constructed with minimized lighting so as to be non-offensive to neighboring homeowners; • No future development or additions to the property without full review and • approval by the Impacted Homeowners. 8C-19 • Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission 2 AUG 96 4110 667 N. Carrol Southlake, TX 76092 This letter is being sent to strongly OPPOSE the application by developer Larry Flynn to re-zone the property located south of FM 1709 between Timberlake and Lake Crest residential subdivisions to construct the Southlake Professional Plaza. We live in the Timberlake Subdivision at 101 Sprinngbrook Court (Lot 20, Block 1) which is adjacent to the subject property. We have not received any official notification of the proposed rezoning even though our home is within 200 feet of the property. This may be due to the fact that we purchased the home from Pierce Homes in October of 1995. Attached is a summary of reasons for the opposition. If there are any problems or questions, please feel free to contact me at 214-603-1402 (day) or 817-424-1986 (evenings). /1441"/41 A\igA,y,tj Steven J. Sims Kathy . Sims • 101 Springbrook Ct Southlake, TX 76092 REC' ,4UG 0 5 1996 III • . , 8C-20 • SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE 410 15851 Dallas Parkway, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75248 (214) 960-9941 August 7, 1996 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Zoning Case - ZA 96 .90 Dear Commissioners : As the Developer of Timberlake, we are in opposition to the proposed zoning of the 2 .95 acre tract to °0-1H Office. Any proposed zoning- of the Property should be to a use compatible with the adjacent residential development . The current request does not appear to ensure that development of this Property will be - compatible. S ,To ensure .compatibility, the site plan for the development should be tied to the zoning and adequately address issues such as potentially objectionable. light'ing,' parking adjacent to the homes, and building materials .. The objective should be to integrate the uses and preserve the existing residential environment . Until issues such as these are addressed, this project is not compatible with the adjoining neighborhoods and should not be approved. . Sincerely, SOU LAKE JOINT VENTURE / A-75-#1:0-----______ Davi Howell i DH/tln cc: Timberlake Homeowner' s Association: 1110 _ 8c 21 RECD AUG 0 91996 15851 DALLAS PARKWAY SUITE 100 LOCK BOX 104 DALLAS TEXAS, 75248 . (214) 490-3255 FAX (214) 991-4949 . . erPaul Guisin • g 808 Ridgedale Court + Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone(817)424-9180 Fax Transmittal (817)424-9180 August 6, 1996 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission Southlake, TX Subject: Opposition to the application for rezoning. Dear Planning and Zoning Commission member, • `It is my understanding on Thursday August 8, the Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission will consider an application to change the zoning of the property at 521 W. Southlake Blvd. South of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and F.M. 1709 adjacent to Timber Lake and Lake Crest subdivisions. As a resident of Timber Lake subdivision, I am opposed to this application. The property is classified as Medium Density Residential in the Land Use Plan and as a resident of Timber Lake were assured that the property in question would be developed for residences in keeping with the existing neighborhood. The application contains a proposed development of a High Density Office Building with a driveway(noise and traffic), parking and security lighting only ten feet from Timber Lake yards. The proposed development is a 32,000 square foot structure which is not in keeping with my expectations for Southlake. As a resident of Irving, Texas for 37 years I experienced "a city attitude anything goes and all developments are good and grow at any cost" In 1992 I moved to Southlake because I believed the city government would control the development of Southlake. Once rezoned the developer is not bound by the one story building illustrated in the application but could build a 2.5 story structure under an "01 zoning". I realize the value of commercial developments and support the growth of our city but in a manner which is consistent with the City of Southlake Land Use Plan. This rezoning is unnecessary as there is property available less than 200 yards east along the • 8C-22 REC'D AUG 0 61996 • south side of FM 1709 between Lake Crest and White Chapel Road which is already for office use. I ask for support of the City of Southlake Land Use Plan and please deny this application for rezoning. Sincerely, Q ,r;A" )' ‘‘4•001 ;17 Paul and Bernice Guisinger er g cc: Southlake city council members • • 8C-23 To: City Of Southlake Planning And Zoning Commission And City Council Members Subject: Opposition To The Application For Rezoning • On Thursday, August 8, 1996, the Southlake Planning and Zoning will consider an application to change the zoning of the property at 521 W. Southlake Blvd., south of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and F.M.1709 adjacent to Timber Lake and Lake Crest subdivisions. The request is to change the zoning to an "al" Office District for . approximately 2.95 acres situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 2C, as recorded in Volume 8374, Page 2186, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. As a resident of the subdivisions involved,.) AM OPPOSED TO THIS APPLICATION. The.primary reasons for my opposition are as follows': - . • The property is classified as Medium Density Residential in the Land Use Plan and the residents of Timber Lake and Lake Crest were assured that the property in question would be developed for residences in keeping with the existing neighborhoods; • The application contains a proposed development of a High Density office building • with a driveway (Noise and Traffic), parking and security lighting ten feet from our back yards; • The proposed development is a 32,000 square foot structure which is hardly in keeping with our expectations for Southlake. Two of these structures would equal another new Kroger--- in our back yards; • Once rezoned, the developer is not bound by the one story building illustrated in the application but could build a 2.5 story structure under an "0-1" zoning; • The proposed development will require a wider, offset intersection at Shady Oaks Drive and FM 1709 (soon to have a stoplight?) causing increased traffic congestion and dangerous traffic conditions. Further, it is questioned whether the proposed driveway cuts will be able to meet city code requirements; • Last but not least, the granting of "0-1" Office District zoning sandwiched between LTimber Lake and Lake Crest will be detrimental to residential property values - property value. ealize the value of commercial development and support the growth of our city but in manner which is consistent with The City Of Southlake Land Use Plan. This rezoning unnecessary as there is property available less than 200 yards east along the south de of FM 1709 between Lake Crest and White Chapel Road - already zoned for office e. I ask for your support of the City Of Southlake Land Use Plan and deny this pplication for rezoning. • micHFh4. '1(1).a/7114 d „s r 4.4 nature Printed Name Date // /0 $ S/°2/N G,3 2 °14._ Ce'c-Aa- t�X- 7(D 012— dress 8C-24 To: City Of Southlake Planning And Zoning Commission And City Council Members *Subject: Opposition To The Application For Rezoning On.Thursday, August 8, 1996, the Southlake Planning and Zoning will consider an application to change the zoning of the property at 521 W. Southlake Blvd., south of the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and F.M.1709 adjacent to Timber Lake and Lake - Crest subdivisions. The request is to change the zoning to an "all: Office District for approximately 2.95 acres situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 2C, as recorded in Volume 8374, Page 2186, Deed Records, Tarrant County, . Texas. As a resident of the subdivisions involved, I AM OPPOSED TO THIS APPLICATION. The primary reasons for my opposition are as follows: • The property is classified as Medium Density Residential in the Land Use Plan and the residents of Timber Lake and Lake Crest were assured that the property in question would be developed for residences in keeping with the existing • neighborhoods; • The application contains a proposed development of a High Density office building with a driveway (Noise and Traffic), parking and security lighting ten feet from our • back yards; • • The proposed development is a 32,000 square foot structure which is hardly in keeping with our expectations for Southlake. Two of these structures would equal another new Kroger--- in our back yards; • Once rezoned, the developer,is not bound by the one story building illustrated in the application but could build a 2.5 story structure under an "0-1" zoning; • The proposed development will require a wider, offset intersection at Shady Oaks Drive and FM 1709 (soon to have a stoplight?) causing increased traffic congestion and dangerous traffic conditions. Further, it is questioned whether the proposed driveway cuts will be able to meet city code requirements; • Last but not least, the granting of "0-1" Office District zoning sandwiched between Timber Lake and Lake Crest will be detrimental to residential property values : 1 property value. I realize the value of commercial development and support the growth of our city but in a manner which is consistent with The City Of Southlake Land Use Plan. This rezoning is unnecessary as there is property available less than 200 yards east along the south side of FM 1709 between Lake Crest and White Chapel Road - already zoned for office use. I ask for your support of the City Of Southlake Land Use Plan and deny this application for rezoning. RECD JUL 3 o 1996 1210/0--c-O 1W;c1,.,(J L e OW*0 Signature 0,outkr+ Printed Name Date i( l UJOOc lP h t,i f— � lc �� 1� 760`t Z_ Address 8C-25 4 TO: City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission • Weareopposed to the application for a ZoningChange for approximately 2.95 acres PP g PP Y situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 2C, from Agricultural , • District to"0-1" Office District (Ref. No. ZA 96-90). The reasons for our opposition are as follow: 1. Southlake's Land Use Plan classifies the property and surrounding area as Medium Density Residential. The proposed building is approximately 32,800 square feet which would qualify as a high-intensity office space. • 2. The construction of an office building of this size, in addition to the substantial commercial development approved for the intersection of Shady Oaks and FM 1709, would result in increased traffic congestion and dangerous traffic conditions. 3. The granting of"O-1" Office District zoning next to Timber Lake and Lake Crest will be detrimental to residential property values in those neighborhoods. 4. The developer is proposing driveways and parking within 10 feet of residential property lines resulting in substantial noise and nuisance for nearby residential property owners. 5. There is currently land zoned"0-1" Office District within 200 yards of the subject • property (between Lake Crest entrance and White's Chapel). Additional "0-1" zoning'is not necessary. 11) • • • 8C-26 "w—I I e 1 I A 682A�� Wfiela 5...01�Ev,� O I s Ac GE f`: (`.i 681C A II -1' ' ;g0.64 AJ: -• -• 8a15 8A9 8A rwr - ■� t 9A I I j i l/l� i I..._.-_ 11 BA1 1 ,\ I 11C2 hA 11C2 10 / • • • •) (-) ! 1 I, ! I i ly— ® E—a N;" V9% i(\p f 1 I,�1d 4, \\Ai ',a! NAL 0 -i- M687 .---r' -• / �BVI i 35 A., �R�\ 1 I er..nr.Ira.LT.al: -'4.�• ..4.t.. s I _ . T -i.. , Y ,2CIC1 \\ �;.Y.I_.I I I_r.., . . I 1A _ _: i I 0' •.N i j CR .Y.1;- \ ! ! ! j 1 1 j j j ! j ! j j j• •j 1 If I -�--�-i- ! .ml,,�"� 11A2A 11A 9F I Q I 1 I 1 I 1 l i i i j '� .'11'*-'� i i i i 1 i 11A2 Ir. ._ "":,r•T-2. IU! is ' \ ; 1 i i 1'S ; ._L i ii 9F riv 1" -4- .-. I i i •. `, l 1 ..` `- ._.. -‘,....,,,,..,4 !•.... . .iTI• n�. , .!i i j j j ! 1 li , 9C 6 0�-r — ■ -l=_ ,. ' 1 r' t 1 I• 1 ' 1 ! I 1 ` -i:y. _. -•- ' ., i ! I i \ 1 i 1 .-4.- �Y7�r • '- - �1 i',i.1 .�'‘ i �. cTar?« © E5 __ ._.-3__. ' < ;ill i i %., ` ` i �'•%;. ! , t i i_ i i i �yi �( _•' -.4.--, r 13 •• ,;cm; i i •�, \ t , ...Al /�. •A. 4'-�.j• I ,J11X' i i iYJri. � - !!�1.Ifli i r �M�- - I—r i i i ` t i 2• j i_ 0 . . `,I -._._ -'-L iMi- '{ , �•'^ �.` g r. • .1(, .'• 'w.Al \-'-'--- \ i ; `' ? ; :. ' 1 ' 2c i I I v i I I i i : I I I I ,y�' . ' I I •` Qt - j7{�y� i ! ` i i - 3A1 ', ! . 1 \ , i i 1 = Y'% .. :IA:.,.. 4�. ....9--`I ��^1 3A1a =I F: v ;_ /•C!J IP'�µ' �/ 1 I i it '1 1 f !' I I' I v / f• i j 1 i j I 1 k • I ! I I i ;LiTITL,FRft H LBriw O• i i % i 1 11 I 1 I I I y :Y w ~ 3J. 3H , ' 1 • 381A 't£T' A-6a6Y3C1 P i ; i ii '• 1 i 1 f j '' f j .-4--f %••- :.:---- V15149 jr: a - 0,, ......: , ..., j b 371.1.,.. :11.41 . i i ` Jy''' �1 1.5 _ rg l.., • 1B At 3.5 Ac -' lik vEST ,cLt:1 3C 30 , e7 Ff�:f;_: '• ltxsr-se ' E 9i'._••-- i _____ rrrr-ice ! ! ! ! ! ! ; • - \ i`'�. 1ix IF ;..--1 ! ! ;.__l ! i h`-a. j �r 2 �-,3C2 '•, 3C SG SF SE 50 501 1%4.11 • _ '-4- -? . '*_ wx weir A j, Ali ` 4i !_ % _ .P1,E Di 10 Ac 6 Ac ' Ac 4. �'..A.„ 1:.:., a 2ti r i I -.^• ,\ 11 3rSt - j: Y r � j4 j`1 i s:. R `' „�` •!•'' �1 ' -�' _ 1s Ac .t_ } J� 'j Ei in; F��;""� i sw r _ _. a oR m Al®i!!7•� o,c�-=`� A- •. 1 • .119R. . . 4//scky - 1111F3-Itif.:- . • . / - .Aiiii immar .- .vii..If • ti 1 /•. �� _ �:,:, . © TA1 pI PINE COURT EA - IIKA ? I 1. i:3-7-‘,11', , • o i � � .W IF '� 931 ''t' 2B 2B3A �• . i j p i 4 48 ��� 4 At O J: JL Iii 4 r, •t 2 r 1 i I45 r-..I -1- elf .CKSis c. ,:,a,: l y ;- . BULL INN GNA ; ..� t-*/..ii-- E''''• I \ i •4..,,,,wc; I" el , _ ;• 1 NINE --ini14 4 4. ilk M WCIl1llr R it GRAM E1-Il r, ;y. ;, 1 6 Ac •-rzri-1•r .1. I. , i I- lei :,.c .,:,,,c: . i; _ 1 I I -. Cra��a. I j i j o_.../...c •+ -' _ j i i AN1 - 10 Ac li,, _ '4-4. .I 1 -- tl •,••11 -� `1,, _.,i / �•- = 4 k 50 5CI • I I .T I i 1 ., ._ _ /i� I •+ 1-Ili • ._�I :.HCET• PARK i i /llavAm.-. • \. c j , - :i . _j•-- tT li• SHE •Nr l- 17. i- irWu.ta� ! ,1 •.,....a.■nH T j 1 1 _ -4 e_■ (iii-:c j�1 '/ 0-:'c::io:r,ten; .1¢ ! ice._ ./' i 1 C ,4 i • 1 i 1 1 ! iiil_ i ..\\-- ! _� •_ i. 1 1 1 i 1 ! % 5 I `• ! `5..- - _'"N1 • — 1 ! L .. I . '�u• .; D 1 • • • 1A1 • -\E � ,•'- -� �' TRACT MAP i a:.::„,.�.. H A ... inIA5 ,A8 - ,.r II .. ,e i a � • ! rrtnacTn...nz� •. �l1 • IA IA9 ! i . T c 1.s `-i �NTHENT II,' .. L�• 1. ! /II-•-.1._..-I11 _ %/ i A. ' -I1 i ! // I \ ! !, • ! ! Ol./'G/ ©... t._._..L.J" x 3C;, 3C Y` ��i-,r r•7- 1-= / / /2`- , '' _ •,.<� 'rl.� ill•. 7 1 F•-kJF6lIV1 TR 384 • GAO.o _______ TR 383 6,". - - ---- .72 AC _ ; TR 305.72 TR • TR 3C 5-2; 1 4.2758 TR 3B4A "AG" C �- 1.35 AC — !2 3.2842 TR 3D4RR �_____ V - _ TR 304 TR 382 G. . HALL IR 3B 88 0 -.4, 5.72 AC ER 3B4A Shady Oaks Lmtd. 1.35 AC . Southlake Four Invst.\ - - — — - - -- ---- R 1A .728 AC 1 State of Texas p Soutb as e JV/ 1R 2c•' -.1 .d•t,�i„,. 1 R 26 r .182 •, M :0k. = 11 •R "' 19 -G T �� .--- 18TR 2 Z G• Z • 1.59 K�� .� C. Hale pierce' " j� PUD 2. Homes ; A-G) " u, -roe 12 - - r • ° EEn (0M1A01.1 / - e, cp � ° - RCEN R. Massa ` ,o , p. Altena --;N,---- --.5 p �� -C --- ' i0 _ \.49 r 0 3 lei D. Lippincottiz�§ 22 i ' ; 3 4 Southlake Jv ITR ?C Gc•O •• L. �• t ,u 14 M. Conrad/ 2.96 AC '0\\ • �y O 1. ...... --- : 3 CI, 7� x S s: JacoboW skl' G��S sas 2 , ,,✓"6' . 1 4: (.a . ./ , oJ G : .. -.,..i.:.: .: .::. ::: . . .. . ., • .� aS Lament I [ MSv2A. ! ,.,, :. .........., 1' P 26 _ `S,3V- -7°4's , Y� ,Home for 10T. • p e 2 _ 1: 51 "' B$pOKME 27 gari - o • ADp6Y 50 use 17 8 C . W. _ �� saS k t ..• a `U9 16 Ci V :�• rx �� 18 IC ' ADJACENT ®' 'N 0 ; ,� Q �' SlC`t �3s w -y v�E'1'3R AND ZONING i a ::: Irineingl V I ,'l,.-- V - 1 i 2: SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#14 ' x '" 1 20 .,� DOUG MCKELVEY 8C-28 i CADDO LAKE D g 21 - • City of South lake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No: ZA 96-90 Review No: Three Date of Review: 12/13/96 Project Name: Concept Plan for S-P-2 Zoning - Shady Oaks Centre (submitted as Southlake Professional Plaza), 2.954 Ac. in the Hiram Granberry Survey Abstract No. 581 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Texas Land and Building Co. DBH Designs 3 Lincoln Centre, Suite 970 1117 Crestview Dallas, Texas 75240 Kauffman, Texas Phone : (214) 692-8522 Phone : (214) 962-4088 Fax : (214) 692-8545 Fax : (214) 962-5333 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/13/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. •.v:::w•• ^..?•:�:?n....y.M1....M1... ...,.N...v.. ....... ..vnw:::;r.•:::.v?:::«r.v w..:.. .::v.n:.::,:{;?•::.::?.�•;?vJ}i?}}}}}:i:?:•$:•......................:::::}}v......... ...... .•..v: ::•%???•}}}:^:^:.:??:•:•:v'•}!:+?hf::4'r6'n/C:v'.}:}:•}::.}:+..}};.:•}}••}y?r.}}:•{n}}:};x.,:,:itiw:::;{..?:..::... ......n.:...v......nr::r.m......:.x..........nrr.....:L.......................n.,}..:......n..r...r.r...............:..:...,}....:........•.::.v.:..Y.::. 1. The Driveway Ordinance No. 634 requires a throat depth of 75' for traffic stacking into the site. However, no new access to F.M. 1709 is proposed on the site. The proposed access is through the Common Access Easement and existing driveway located on the adjoining tract to the east. Please note that the location of the existing building on the adjoining site to the east would prohibit any further extension of the driveway throat depth. Loading spaces and service areas must be located at the side or rear and must be screened by a 10' masonry wall similar to the front facade of the building where the loading area is adjacent to residential property. 3. Trash dumpster must be gated and screened by a minimum 8' masonry wall similar to the primary structure. * The review of this plan is based on the"0-1" zoning district. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 12/23/96. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and include axi 11"x 17"revised reduction. * Building articulation requirements will not be reviewed at the Concept Plan level. This issue will be addressed upon review of the Site Plans. Please note that all buildings must meet the architectural standards of the Corridor Overlay Zone Regulations as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance 480, Section 43.9.c.1. • 8C-29 City of Southlake,Texas * The minimum setback required along the property lines adjacent to Lake Crest and Timber Lakes is 40'. However, should any proposed building on the site exceed one story or 20' in height(measured • UBC standard)the required setback will be determined by a 4:1 slope line from the property line.No part of the building can encroach above the slope line. * All mechanical units including satellite dishes must be fully screened of view from F.M. 1709, S.H. 114,and/or from properties within 400'having residential zoning or a low or medium density residential Land Use Designation. • * Although no review of required parking or interior landscape is provided at the Concept Plan level, staff strongly recommends that the lot be evaluated for compliance with the off-street parking requirements per Ord.480, Section 35,and the interior landscape area requirements per the Landscape Ordinance No. 544 prior to preparation of any site plans. The applicant should be aware that all areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and all fire lanes must be per the City Fire Department. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a plat must be submitted for approval and filed in the County Plat Records, a site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * Fire lanes must meet City Fire Department requirements. • The following items on the plan do not appear to comply with the "Impacted Homeowners p pY p Requirements for Zoning"dated 11/21/96 and as amended by the Planning and Zoning Commission: • Parking spaces located at the northwest and east portion of the site do not meet the minimum 70' spacing from residential properties as required in Item# 7 regarding parking. • Interior Design uses have been noted for elimination on the plan, but is not eliminated on the attachment of permitted uses. * Minimum parking requirements cannot be determined until floor area by use has been determined. P&ZACTION: August 8, 1996;Approved(7-0) to table to the August 22, 1996 Planning& Zoning Commission meeting. August 22, 1996;Approved(7-0) to table to The September 5, 1996 Planning&Zoning Commission meeting. September 5, 1996;Approved(7-0) applicant's request to table until the September 19, 1996 Planning& Zoning Commission. • September 19, 1996;Approved(7-0) applicant's request to table until the November 7, 1996 Planning& Zoning Commission. 8C-30 City of South lake,Texas November 7, 1996;Public Hearing continued to November 14, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. r . November 14, 1996;Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the November 21, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. November 21, 1996;Public Hearing continued to December 5, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. December 5, 1996;Approved(5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated November 1, 1996, and incorporating Impacted Homeowners document Revised November 21, 1996 and received November 27, 1996: amending as follows: Item #1 (Permitted Uses) adding "currently adopted" to precede "City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance" in the first sentence, add "(See attachment of permitted uses)following the last sentence and attach to the Impacted Homeowners document the listing of"0- 1"permitted uses of the current Zoning Ordinance No. 480, striking out uses to be eliminated;Rem#4(Roof Design) delete the second and third sentence and add "Roof to match or be greater than the pitch of Dr7 Huckabee's office building and must be of composition shingles";Rem #5 (Masonry Wall) delete "in masonry appearance" and add in its place "the solid portion of'; Item #7 (Parking) adding "currently adopted" to precede "City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance" in the first sentence, delete "in effect during 1996"and add "in no event be more than"preceding "90 parking spaces"; Item #9(3) (trash containers/receptacles)delete in its entirety (". . • . hidden from view from all adjacent homeowners'properties and travelers on F.M. 1709'); Item #10, (satellite dishes) delete ". . . second story view" and add ". . .Satellite dishes shall be ground mounted and shall be screened to height equal to or greater than the dish"; Item #11 (site plan requirements) delete ". . .and placed as appropriate to the tree type so as to ensure "full screening" coverage as seen by residential property owners from their second story windows. An additional buffer of one (1) canopy tree and six(6) large (6'- 10') shrubs to be planted and maintained between the northwest parking spaces and residential property line;"and add "The minimum caliper of trees shall be 3"with placement to be determined at the time of site plan approval"; Item #13 (signs) delete ". . . so as to be non-offensive to neighboring homeowners"; Rem #14 (future development or additions) delete in its entirety. Applicant allowed to reserve the right to modem drive location and building on the site plan. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: DBH Designs; Texas Land and Building Co. \L:\WP-FILES\REV\96\96-090CP.3 • 8C-31 • III 11111 • • L.":a. BLOCK I TR. ERLAKE SECTION I OLIELCPEO 1T on .T 2 LOT 22 LOT 21 LOT 24 i LOT 23 I /�rs�µ I I LOT 20 I IUIL ......A.. e"./dry /os d l�•.,..Ar.a•w.l.wm: I wn r'�'•" I BUILDING L,�F... Ml F�l I. .,ry Y+s MN F-/e•NGM� .��•..p.•,. COMPANY .._..__ I jar II .¢vya� .y � Gw erresn1 NOO'OS'38'W 4Gd.k' .Alnl �Qyin I ��] MO M EILFK oria D V • • F .oCli • • Si aAwc$i FAa - • LOT 9 • • I I- Location Map /.- ..ss - r y 7.0B0 S.F. r— tI ' ,:,___,_drw'u..........6..a.. 124 de Z e. IO9 I MiEa i 5021629W 2d1d5' -I .44444 W;i g �I '�. : ms < UC.. .. ....�� I I— , oo: sv .- r�....._.-� r--- ;8 �LrI I 444 eL 0 GO LOT 20 MI II I t- A A/ISO i I I� .m Ni J 0. -�CFT.4Ovl SPtM6._..�'-- M1F1 fHU - AICNrfOF: ..-..F.. -AI ....2.2.1c..... �.r,. • G,fL�T...i I�-1 C i....L.* 1J-t......•:•:•:•.•.IK=.•.tsTA r,uU 7Yan 1�. .,.,. • A.Fro../OM 0..44 N V Fm S 0215'03'W 2553J'• ••:•••••••:•:•••• F T r3N] • BLOCK 2 ..s r S.W. • f• art vm-.or LAKE CREST LOT 21 Off �\ A•e+w ¢„..o.,-r r.�.y..11.,.b C.r e...A F..wr q,bfi.F+..ti Flo O0.trFY.Yra. N a•w� ����-y r..i......„...l.w,=,r„q'L„ SUMMARY CHART - BUFFERYARDS .w�,o+A..r,.i.C..y., le,.,MA..a•f90. }..t.M.nY.wia Tr,F-t T=.r lam.ME,Y,1 bli. `y L„.,..lrrAK.ho. I`.11.r.1.b'....I..i rl I•1�/i.,wf..A r.. DSO Pl ew11 Y r. .w Lake Crest Drive SO%A.0:„rr'.-MO n ..- w. Tr.-,A. DellU-uas - / I .- = ro It...: I r r...Aw=wb. ,2 MI.T1,.To F n..b.e —Ar /MI..1 tl....w„5 b.To.F-] .. 1 1 , r inw�....`..:.��Ls."1�S� Frio N Mtrotbl.T r ,mr.:41. Concept Plan �..,M r...b.,o-I...p b„..b„trio A ... i i S•r`..-�...r �y..iJ�-i. 3H1 ww SCATS I--00•-0�� AF Mf.f b M 1,..br FL•.a...„e.r A. ` •••- •• •-^ • r . 'T.`-.--r••" AA..¢.rso AA 00 18ti b MF•b M rFLb 110.W..1 T=bi Trq�M' bb,r b I* /-VOW..It A.•/-M2( r_. W.r...1...1IPA HFz DATE VV96 • • .1/b I.le1611.1 Ty. ¢..An-r...bw ""...=:� .-.........r—tO..... Wln w'.U-C,�dtl moony PAN 11.01w rA r. 17 r..10 r..br w na•wr...Va DISe16W �...1.1¢-1m..'F••1 now F4 b BAS =..„1 Pea. AM...rim. AL 14. ~ /AA*per FeGOwl.IwR1.. � E �Cp NOV 131996 ) AA SCALE r=JD'-O- 1M• CASE NO. Z A 96-90 1 of • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS • ORDINANCEWNO.48Q-2IX, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 2:95"ACRES SITUATED IN THE HIRAM CRANBERRY-SURVEY,-ABSTRACT-NO'581 TRACT 2G,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL._DISTRICT TO 'S:P:2' GENERALIZED4SITEPLAN-DISTRICT:WITIT'CERTAIN`"0=1"" OFFICE DISTRICT ITSES, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; • PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as `AG"'=A griculturall Dislrlct under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by III the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-211.SP2 1 I Page 1 8C-33 • facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public • necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, • WHEREAS,the CityCouncil of the Cityof Southlake, Texas,does find that the changes in g zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed Sand amended as shown and described below: Being a 2 95'acre tract of land situated in the Hiram-Granbef yRSu vey,Abstract No L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-211.SP2 1 Page 2 8C-34 i, • 581 i`Tract>2C, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG'' Agricultural l=District to ;"S2P22", Generalized':S ite Plan District;with ce rtain;"O=-1"""Office-Dis riet useg as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map- of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable Sconsideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances Saffecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-211.SP2 Page 3 8C-35 until final disposition by the courts. • Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: S CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR S L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-211.SP2 8 C-3 6 Page 4 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: • EFFECTIVE: • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-211.SP2 Page 5 8C-37 li • Impacted Homeowners' Requirements For Rezoning Revised 11/21/96 Hiram Granberry Survey,Abstract No.581,Tract 2C Volume 8374,Page 2186,Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas The following requirements and uses are clearly defined and are enforceable now and in the future as part of the S-P-2 rezoning submission for this property. Site Plans include:the actual landscape plan,elevation views from front, side and back and clearly identified renderings to scale of the following,site plan requirements; 1. 0-1, "Office District"permitted uses as stated in the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance in use during 1996 with the removal of the following high traffic uses:Banking, Savings and Loan,Duplication and Mailing Services,Employment . Services,Radio Recording and Television Broadcasting, Travel Bureaus or services, Real Estate, Bill Paying Services, and Community Facility Uses:Libraries,.City Halls, Fire and Police Stations, and other municipal uses; .'ai; 2. Only two(2)single story buildings will be erected on this site. The building to the west(closest to FM 1709)will face to the east,not to exceed 7,400 s.f., and will be placed a minimum of 45 feet from the west property line. The building to the south will face to the north,will not exceed 11,800 s.f., and will be placed at least 100 feet from the south property line. The peaks of the buildings shall not exceed 23 feet in height; •3. The maximum height of any structure to be 23 feet including the peak of the roof; 4. Building elevation includes roof design. Construction of roof must be similar in construction to the adjacent business office. The Larger,longer building to the south will have multiple roof elevations to avoid a single, straight sight line along the peak of the roof as viewed from the front or rear of the'building. Flat roofs on either building are unacceptable; 5. A solid 8'tall masonry wall matching in masonry appearance Timber Lake's existing wall to be constructed within 60 days of ground breaking along the south and west property lines. 6. No rear of building vehicle access. No impervious material to be constructed in these areas; • L:\CTYDOCS\ORDICASESl480-211.SP2 i, Page 6 8C-38 . . , III i I ...... _ , /, Impacted homeowners'Requirements Far Rezoning-Revised 11/21/96 page 2 Hiram Granberry Survey,Abstract No.581,Tract 2C Valuate.8374,Page 2186,Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas 7. Parking will not exceed the minimum requirements of the City of Southiake Zoning Ordinance in effect during 1996 or 90 parking spaces,whichever is fewer and all parking spaces wilt be placed a minimum of 70 feet from residential property lines; 8. All building utilities and equipment appropriately concealed behind solid masonry Walls; 9. Trash containers/receptacles for the development to be(1)placed along the east-northeast property line and away from residential property;(2)contained within a masonry wall with a closing wooden gate, and;(3)be hidden from view from all adjacent homeowners'properties and travelers on F.M. 1709; ilkNo satellite dish to be placed on the propeily over 6'in diameter and must be screened from residential property, second ry view; 11. The site plan must include a detailed landscape plan as an addendum and must specify and quantify the landscape plantings while clearly depicting their placement on the site plan. In addition to the Bufferyard I-1 requirements the developer will add Buffetyard C planting with a minimum of 5 canopy trees per 100'run as well as change Bufferyard M planting to Bufferyard P planting. We emphasize:The areas to the west and south of the two buildings will be heavily landscaped with a minimum of five(5)large canopy trees per 100 feet and placed as appropriate to the tree type so as to ensure"full screening"coverage as seen by residential property owners from their second story windows. An additional buffer of one(1)canopy tree and six(6)large(6'-10')shrubs to be planted and maintained between the northwest parking spaces and the residential property line; i 12. Exterior lighting will be for security lighting purposes only and will be placed in such a manner to be directed toward the non-residential buildings and must not"spill over"on to the adjoining Homeowners'property. All rear building security ill . . . L:ICTYDOCS\ORDICASES\480-211.SP2 Page 7 I . 8C-39 • S i lights must include motion sensors to minimize their utilization to reduce light pollution for the residential property owners; 13. All outdoor business signs will be in compliance with the City of Southlake's sign Ordinances. Only monument signs will be constructed with minimized lighting so as to be non-offensive to neighboring homeowners; 14. No future development or additions to the property without full notification and review by the Impacted Homeowners as required for any change to an S-P zoning. 0 . . . . . • . • S - . L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-211.SP2 Page 8 8C-40 EXHIBIT"A" 0 Being.a 2.15 acre tract of fond siluat.d in the ►HlRAtl CRANBERRY St/WEI. A,B`SIRACT NO. Sat, in.Wan.* Tarroni : . Countr..Texas. and Wing tt'o r.moinpar of tnol ta►fain Marvin.A. '.,tldy•f gat:-as•rocord.d to Vo1u u 4508. Page 46.1. Deed Records. Tarrant County.-Tools. Said. 2.43.aere .tract-1&4...nsiis'porfkagly• • • described as follows: . BEGIHNNNG al a 5/6 inch iron 'rot found in the So.r/n tine' .of;West •Sotithtots -91Oi.h'cord.(.f.Ar.. Ht ha ay ' • No. 1109), said'point being the Nortn.asf corner of Lot 20. Brock••1. Tt11BER-MAKE. SECTION.1, as . recorded in Cabinst A. Slide 485. Plat Records, Tarronl :Coheir, twos: ItfCNCE South 4 7 degrees 55 rnln..s•s 09 seconds Lost, al e-th 3dufh-tin* of Witt So nt Ioj a.Bofdm►otd. (I.M.,Highway No. 1709). a distance of 1Q6.t 4 f.•t to a -5/8 Inch kV'.tgOk found. SOW path b$nfi t • Northwest corner of o tract.of land fa w. mottle as *.corded in Vowing 83.74, Pal..2f66; 'Wed It.cardi. ?arrant County. Texol; • • !H£NCC South 02 degrees 18 minjt.s 29 seconds West. along. the West lire of sold fiords, tract. a dltkne • of 241.46 feet to a 1/2 inch .ran rod found for tali Southwest corner of sold Norris trait!: . THENCE South 69 degrees 00 mut ines 05 seconds East, along the •Sesr,h'Nr• of sold.Korrls'tract. o distance of 165.00 feet. to a 5.6 inch iron rod set far the Southeast corner of soic Maids froe1, sold...'- paint being In the•lkest.rty'fine of LAKE CREST. as recorded in Cobin.t A,--Sliot 154.1.. Rot t1'itords,' . Tarrant County. Telco,: - !HENCE South 02 degrees 15 n+inutes '03 seconds'West.,ate ., the W..* nd t,rly fine-.of LAKE.CREST, m Sdistonci of 255..33 feet to a point for an 'C darner of LAKE CREST. a being the eommori Norfh.rty corner of '4.01 20 and Lot 21. Block 2 of sold. LAKE CREST; THENCE North 87 deg sos S6 Minutes 10 -seconds Mfasf. *king fht Noyfh line of Eot 19 and.l of 20. _. Block 2. LAKE CREST. 330.64 fief to.a 5/8 ingh iron rod found for the NaAQwiet.'oornsr.of Lot -ti. . • and being In the Cott lino of Let 24 Ssock 1.-Of sold TIMBER-LAKE. SECTION 1; •• • THENCE North 00 d.Gr.es 05 minutes 315 seconds West, along a.partlOn of The East tin. of Lot .24. • Brock 1, UMBER LAKE. SECTION 1, Ma East ens O. Let 23. Lot 22. Cot 24 and Lal 24. Block. 1. Tta3CR LAKE. SECTION 1, a•distance of 494.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. • • • iii L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-211.SP2 Page 9 8C-41 • 0 • 0e od O (-] . I p f�o.+. BLOCK I TIMBERLAKE SECTION I cE\so�u r LOT 24 LOT 23 1 LOT 22 LOT 21 LOT 20 i u� A/.e0 I �� .'000 r I 0/400 w I /00�.� I /.If BUILDING Nr..•.CA ...e...L.r..a.4Tuo.: r.....n.•.44..RD.l.od •..•.....e rx•w n.no T..•.�Wrx.•ew.ov �iwa�w.iu`n Cud COMPANY N =I r.erFye' I a+. r..............wrl •..o.w e�y.a ��©...,.:.:.... cn..ea� ..—..�-o;I ..} •-•"• ..~ 1 N00'05'36'W 494.t2.•.•.. .... W---- ..._ CLIME —w itn—n'anw /.'F. r://�� a�oMte4Orrea '. � D.Ar-Y Mr t D.iAAs rQu • '� �� t U L <11 mane tar I.OR .. LOT Is • • I I__ --� `r— - -- ' Location Map O • 'Xi I ax_t� ...�. .. i ._.... .. rs �..�...�.. :. ;,.Z..,... :. .,'•�� E 0 ;, ' Sf>�•dY Oek � ; ...,,,r K • I ,—(-.......�A raaw- ~ 1 O �'iao.A°e. 1'e. r W 00 , I 7 'ti« j CO r. Fo ., Z T1Y (Y Iv —I _ S02b29'W 24145 .. I ._�.• r.... -i (, t il _ ® e 4 of... tn 4CR�L..�C�'. ¢ X 1--i 0. i� IC ' C I =; is s i: 5 rw- MI LOT 20 rn g d A IHI I fl I I 2 (7 r SJ _ G •.w e ' —A?rr.rCP01N-S..•—_— .. r J 11 _ I CGQIT R1n F0.1 �1 • AN FO 1'IIW .'. 1 / i fah OW C.n. .u•Oer XABK.'. I '�ew l- I.M.Y �T''� COKE \ 1 � T....•Ca..y Y-1 1' .... .'.'.'.'..a=r_Nltt�.YlM hRt-�' . • . • at C100.0 Mn.l.•eb Ca.n'i..NVFI. // •'•S 021503 W 25533 ..—..—.. 1 rsin BLOCK•2 Aal r-]rw., ••\AN F-1 IN 1•�•• 0wn<o..r 1^I••IP.A...C.r I...A O...ry t0ar Krt9rD IOW.)Ma LAKE CREST a./.ISII .......r b.M.a.•.w IY as to w.Wt. w 1w•Dana In...r LOT II w macs w.....A� a�,r b....t...•..nr.�w•.•brC.. SUMMARY CHART — BUFFERYARDS 0. � \ .¢•.11 T At r .� 1!0 R C.n.I 440 h.w�.r�.-iw \ Crest.ar.iv ca. r u1.rr...N.ad.wol'ow li.w•nr ln.»F•.a .a. Win. 'o..: . Dr.Town rsx r "'0^^ \ take Crest Drive sms.°ii..M Tow A Le00•y R �•'• i QUI ev-esn IY.er1fr�M « �. r .Goo Pwas .1. .a oAO loark•To*To lab T•. I. FM VO0 •Tyro I-] y. 34 . . v---.. Concept Plan -r...e..TMan�e.T..•� Y = r Lien 3 ; - -- , .ate `\\j' t.s.'r"'wM•M o-1 w..M.wr n..b rrr A 6 A :i•T^w^� w w�.o:i„i.o r !GALS I.•OO'-0�j AS F+b�rrN.h.�.fny.FMB.r 1�..�•..+nh.►u► :`-iT`_ T.V A...�w}0.+ p..�y..'Fbr• ..wY..R0.w..1 wa ra. a DATE VV9r PM 170r rww•M I.•/-.?00..IL el b�...•w. 4Mf/wa.F••1 R MrR -_ Id•Ir Me.lb r•►�/•r/A00q R.•/•Mbl -.a...�..w.�r wr+.• /1 1W\Twa(Wool Prowl .I M.•1• .rr o...0 U.CI. o 4' .0.... 6w An.P.M. .wS it n.. ./•MOO1NA.*OfAMeMRO.Wl .r.•a...no. "r"J.•..�. PAN N.A. .w .1� Tr. . Iwe1.I...... AM l Copt vrs Nos M..n blrr..e.a v.,.F7. WAl I.AA�rt..••r.�— .D.RTAA A.w RED NOV 131996 f CA&E r'•x'o- Nn.nl CASE NO . Z A 96-90 1 e 1 R City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT January 3, 1997 _s2ASE NO: ZA 96-149 PROJECT: Plat Revision-Proposed Lot 1R1,Block 1,W.E.Mayfield Addition STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision for the proposed Lot 1R1, Block 1, W. E. Mayfield Addition, being a revision of Lot 1E1,W.E.Mayfield Addition,and being approximately 0.892 acres situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474. LOCATION: 2438 E. Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), on the north side of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709), and approximately 280' east of Bluebonnet Drive. OWNER/APPLICANT: Liberty Bank CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Village Center NO.NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: November 21, 1996; Approved (7-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated November 15, 1996. COUNCIL ACTION: --December 3, 1996; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the December 17, 1996 City Council meeting. December 17, 1996; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table unitl the January 7, 1997 City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the items in Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated November 15, 1996 with the exception of those items in the attached Plat • Review Summary No. 2 dated January 3, 1997. 41 . P-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-149PR.WPD 7G-1 w "< I 501 $10-I -- - • p.)V. - -r '11-1 'Y7-: i 501 1 c. A NI U,F I = F" • MLA N �,, ,J r 5A4 • 58481 St*WY A-5.5 284A act ►. 'KO NA A HQN 4 261 2811 208 287 2812':12A 286 • 2 f j V1 ! • /13I I1fI1, , , ' - - ..r..T -L�- .I < 282 28. 283 289 285 2B10 284 li � ~ n 1 t _ I .:.� 19 2G x 2l '2N ?F 2J • •r , •• _ — I '^ 44 -MO�� _—— , .• HI'11Ni1]/1II, i ��tA�)7' 1 2K zE 20 2R 2Y ' . ' , • ,tmrAlol i -- �_ 9 GOPAm1'1 © 0 -- A �J'" -- rr 2AI -- r1) L T - IiII584E z -��p- �ool �' -- a -- 5a2 :20uoy 2Az•• 1NP1N 1. - I-- 1 2AtA —— sex E5 I seze sezA _ �,.,�,. AM/WV'AS Eth STE ' I 163 16 182 , 41 .a , Ss1RtEY A-458 8 0 • to 2E9C NORTH WEST �•E T ' • .i 6 20dr4 2E14 �2E3 E9 I____ I I 1 2E12 N7 . 16141. I 1 P 17 r, :: 1 ' Gl ' I AuSnN PLACE = MAY"' J �`�� t ,, „ •. , l _ AIE.aoo LANE 2E5 2 Oy yil L EAST SOUTHLAKE BLW. 1: I �✓ . { , tC 2 28 182 1B l I I I I I I 1B2A 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I • a.• .�,/ 1828 LI l< ,® — i r 1 ., N R ZB .I I,R, t� 3 3E x "y 15Ac• Q 2E V'RE zAzA�' ' sa, ' T o I _r ' C V 1B1 6A1AI04 I 2 / 2AlA 2A18 • 1D 381 _Y 3 vi 2A1C 1 i I 2A: AIM ,� J L_ LSD '••• IC ' 2A3A / 2A140,... 2 3A ���� 1/09 Ac ' . G 1�. 11©118 ——— -- - 10 - „E ' --- ---— PvGF • —'————•— 1 v " _ < TOM G°Q�TaB _ 3A to --.- ---+ - STAVE' A-474 I 1 '` —'--- ---'----� • y? _ 136 Ac rOP‘149- - 5 5A ---ID I Io -- _ iZ] • • Ho iii --T/I 6G 4A1 -- a 1 1 _,t•- W . , ____ 1 4A4 1 1 ' 1 �c, 1101 ---z I ; I : IGli < 11 6K 6Ic1 E I : 1 i Dy �= EACITANCE Blw --. , $ , : I 1 I 1105A1 - 1104 I I I I F 1 G J 0383 3 1 GRAPENNE CITY LIMIT 6 II1 3 Ac 6.15 Ac ) I •1 INDUSTRIAL BLW11e--- 1 -. • E E 11 88 681 Cig ----;e- 1 1[ � � RK • • .i'l;IN-°- 1 I CiR5514 '. . nd. - Ip r-'- TRACT MAP (1 I I I ; ` i i I 4A it i . ,lb I I I I __ S I . t�lu r�: PkG i i • I — _ .SU" 7G-2 : 1r NEfZ 1 IRK, mice teaw 18I>E teu ��`;� ID 11 to f 1wr7/ Ie101 ' IBIM I+MCI \ l j . l• I .TT: � / 1--J OCI �' -- - - ADJACENT OWNERS 7-10 B - AND ZONING \, , r -AC - :\ .{ \\/ C l SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#7 \J\I ' !— . — — DARRELL FAGLIE ' 332 j Wetzel m . ,,AG" "C-3" Family f I Partnership -,,,,._,..„,_„ J. Parker E (� 1E2 r — — . . - - - • _.i f „AG„ , R. Lee l 2C f, ��� H. Eaton - - "AG" 1 ' ilv_. „C_3„ _.____ `. state ofT�` B1 A ` Southlake Kimball . exas R-G 1 ' i Venture' • 2A3A1 2/122A2 /1 2A "AG" „C_2" 2A2A 2A1 2 G. Nettleton R. Lyford 2A - • City of 1 Southlake "CS" _41______ 7G-3 City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY 411)tse No: ZA 96-149 Review No: Two Date of Review: 1/03/97 Project Name: Plat Revision-Liberty Bank,proposed Lot 1R1,Block 1,W.E.Mayfield Addition,being a revision of 0.892 Acres out of Lot 1,W.E. Mayfield Addition,in the Samuel Freeman Survey Abst. # 525 / APPLICANT: . SURVEYOR: Liberty Bank Ernest Hedgcoth Consulting Engineers 5801 Davis Boulevard 5701-C Midway Road North Richland Hills, Texas Fort Worth, Texas 76117 Phone : (817) 656-0038 Phone : (817) 831.-7711 Fax : (817) 598-6424 Attn: Steve Ingham Fax : (817) 831-6368 / CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/23/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS'SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Show and label the survey lines and abstract numbers as they cross the property. Correct the Abstract No. of the Samuel Freeman Survey to Abstract No. 525. Include the Abstract Numbers in the preamble (second paragraph) of the metes and bounds description. IIIChange the last four sentences of the plat title block to "... being a revision of 0.892 Acres of Lot 1, W.E. Mayfield Addition as recorded in Volume 388-C, Page 4, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas located in the Thomas Easter Survey Abst. #474 and the Samuel Freeman Survey Abst. # 525." 3. Confirm that Liberty Bank is in fact a"Corporation"as noted in the owner's notary. If confirmed, reflect this in the preamble of the legal description and in the dedication statement. 4. Correct the discrepancy between the distance in the last call of the written legal description and the • graphic label on the south lot boundary. 5. Label the lot number ( i.e. Portion of Lot 1) and plat record on all adjacent tracts out of the W.E. Mayfield Addition. . • P&Z ACTION: November 21, 1996; Approved (7-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated November 15, 1996. COUNCIL_ACTION:December 3, 1996; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the December 17, 1996 City Council meeting. December 17, 1996; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the January • 7, 1997 City Council meeting. 7G-4 i City of Southlake,Texas * Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original • signatures. * All taxes due must be paid prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Liberty Bank Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineers,Inc. L:\WP-FILES\REV\96\96-149PR.2 • • 7G-5 . i t • . . • 2,.,t��,w„�NT OF,.. . . . • . • 1 n ° f ,o ..,„;.,,s re PARKER [.G.a U•M.An,,6..2 ryn PO.11160 PG.Y]! f •w ura.Kn u a.•.Nw;N K TSIJ MN,DELD e vlaei�w c.nt,•a'lanan'"0 v,.Yna..e r• • 1e✓'. CID SCALE 1" = 20 I.oxm RKNuwo 1alu,T[W T ,Aiz. M.itra.6..a 1.carc•.Terra.[°�,,.:11•'7:,,::[we`w`w°a,..i ry 01.0 AC.Ouf Or TR.1 0/n.L HARrI[LD ` , anv r.. .. . SUBOMSION I No.a ref✓Iw eel.re.0.5 GOER M0 ENE 5.MIRAN SURv[i5. r NUM MOO PMmER6,N LTD. M Or I.r°h Wt.VAIPOD I VOL.10I11 PC.ST. Sea.i:.. n Y.A:n:lee-e,Iua• M,R•tae.a w.w[Cawy. 1 101 KOLA.W.MS r•..... eLe pe$:✓enr rtcrd•! —_ I .N,uL IOW POO-5,]J W,a]wv g mltr W lwnr•e l.r.0 STATE ISVY. 11a I CaNm•w• eCtnrac Ire o~ w A.,A.„RO.. ✓1.Sr w..•n•.ru I LOC.✓.(0 IOC t .%y Swu 21 .e..t M w+wht Crt 1.06 Net re Nana C•serer I/Y 1L. �', . �ml tro t•n,r..N.se,.m.ot wn.u.a LOT F,a1. • S 89'47'00•E 206.2' I/—1/2 use. 11.,,Ct Henn]a.s.o 11 mantasTeeu 15..1e Net 1n.n Fen Pn At tA• everes F. "tt �fr°w:nu cww✓:;vy]U1�t.;IMtM•t S'UN4 ENT law. 't ems: rw,c[Srin N 1e....]]m.al tN.)^ rl•wn Z I SzweronBlM.Ia vi Ssalt�r.n ewn y yp a4 Z 2� o SITE • 1 rwrcee N.rw]o atsn..,e,.:.n..sa ntw.xm noD•1.✓r•y �] m / ! HHw110��a1,!0%..t.u.;;21 er Nmu:wc«•R tentwy 0651 w.• W pq Pbva Pewee.Rate I J✓,.0%1SSJ, P • m • SONtMK4 la.v..Ccmmawt^Iw i60 tQ,.e a n NOi F F.M. 1709_ I 1 Urn•✓.6..0 aa,NI w:..4.WAY!lr wee•✓r...le• SOUTILAKE BLVD. 1 warn.,Kn,a.Mel•es o`na ts,✓..no re m 11•41.a°t•r.w.a,n✓rn. KN.ALLT I. ,nt5E PRE5O05, '� n NAT.Lb.,2.1.cr and no n w. rsgMw; .e w.n,w...I.t let 1• T .[✓,,.: alu„u, Ct+n G,'°'.,tr...1u•, LOT1 R 1 Arent Cwn`�eys.T Geo s . .t.a w Kn..].en,.,., I BLOCK 1 I no.ma rePenr,. .. .•N.tr.. • 1 E. g pI1•655 ar taw re Se_t✓e5-•_T e_Cr.,,T.,c.R•M �_--set : In AREA=38855.52 S.F. a Vp. leLEY eraG 1602 _ g 1t.1-•1 a TA.1-01A Ei.MC^e+_F 5001nl n (�� VICINITY MAP I \ .y DagwK SOUmunE uno. ca ai."R..ut y' \ \ e I i.°sRE..t:�-u u9ciPr eawi:•w w.to a«.n w,a Fr. \>o. n1. YSue✓.msn MUM,. \'\ • ,•e..4WD A,6.,e.o�u4 OF MCC nan v.te•_-_e,✓ Eta. 6W.Dr . .✓ .,., r 1�5RT. I f .. „'�.'b::.Nnent re nem.C...n,•�.I..., ,i a ....•r..e.rrer'bi4a Annan he R.C.• \ r K m.:.n....,. \ N61e6,Wo a a,—6TM TATFEI(El riT:f— oa..i•°nwo00 a F ✓m .,..✓au re w.v:✓m(s.011 'n ar \ I •ma \•- ..e. .a n....`.•.Gn .1�r(r) •....owµ•te. \ / vim.. 6,.r[ ,[R.5 1 COun,r W Uxu.i e abo.rear Irer .'>. : '.,°. -°, u w�wK�.ry n w• N \ /' 'gL sW: °.`M:sew:tre e im..t w.a„e..n.•R.o mows NHn t r..h..«w U. ad•:i en'a.nnav waa nb ..n ww a e. So2,p J. �/•,\ \t' ..� Y o«nwb',:w..R.......• 'i vat 'i,,.. -a,'.r w: '•"h ,"� lJ it - `.wfe"- :er re a•. e '..rr '"7Lr \ Ree saRCo Rw�Esia.e Irm sw•:,w 26oe ,»n:.V "«uan'.r. oh,.V...::.r.u'ow..n'..I°..u,un.,.,`�r:.w"°�. .... �rl te. \ el Pow sew.- .;een re e..<..r .,.Ce. N.w. , Saws,Teen. Crap at.Ri• N."•a. \ �EVA , ,,. [....r n.].0 b✓Door,AO.INS CCU . 1/]'LRI. ""' ° " "' I J o. R O 1 PLAT REVISION •]Y� LOT 1R1, BLOCK 1 g 8 (F,,, W.E. IMIAYFIELD ADDITION 1'D9) \— AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE /4----::—.,9,. s \ TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS \ 82o-et••t•P ` . 0,892 ACRES OUT OF TIE 1IOMAS EASTER.ASST. #474 \4 '� ,P ,,,e, ` . k THE S. FREEMAN SURVEYS, a801. #575 - yt'r ., I RECORDED VOL, 388-C, PAGE 4, d' . 87�J0. TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS '°,••••'^..^ . I e O.r.•.. '3'Ft' N \ \ TiRS PLAT((.CU IN GO/It, SLIDE DATE• r e. • APPROVED FINAL PLAT T yL. 0 $'O.�. 1 C err. LOT I.BLOCK 1 L.0 D..NIxEO USE.C-2 3 £ 'r2•f h Z. GEORGETOWN POW ADDITION DEC _• 1.056 AO. /„ '� UC ''6J6' • E 2 3 1996 04. GCOUNT':C O FILE N,MINERS,LTD. OWNER: LIBERTY BANK r1L u" COUNT':COUNTY CLERK'S PILE N0,01961 R66l6 APPROVCD PPC4xINARY PLO . _ cOaNtt CLERK'S atc0aos �/ Los 2,eLocx 1 • A ERNEST HEDCCOTH IMPROVED COUNTY I06NO'S .S GEORGETOWN PARK ADDITION •Z•'L 11,- 14/ _ _ _ 1056 AC. 5801 DAVIS BLVD. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. f. / OCOUNLY CL..:,YrOCNOP01 ,1-"16 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS OO1-C MOOT AO. COUNTY CLERIC'S REDDRpS FORT•ORTR,TIT. TARRANT CWNIP%OAS TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS OM" It APPROVED FOR PILINGPRINTED:DECEMBER 1. 1996 CASE NO. 2A 98-119 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT S. January 3, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-151 PROJECT: Site Plan/The Village at Timarron,Phase I STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 •REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for The Village at Timarron,Phase I,being proposed as Lot 3, Block 60, Timarron Addition, Phase 5, and being legally described as being a portion of Lots 1C2 and Lot 1B2, Block 1, Dilg Place, and being approkimately 3.50 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. LOCATION: South side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) at the southeast corner of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway. OWNER: Timarron Land Corporation. APPLICANT: Venus (Drews)Partner V, L.P. •JRRENT ZONING: "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District, being P.U.D. No. 1, Timarron and permitting "C-2" Local Retail uses on this site. LAND USE CATEGORY:.Medium Density Residential (limited.low intensity office and/or retail uses). CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Existing Retail Zoning. NO. NOTICES SENT: Six(6) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: December 5, 1996; Public Hearing continued to December 19, 1996 due to Resolution 95-24. December 19, 1996; Approved (6-0-1) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 27, 1996, amending Item #2 (required bufferyards and plantings) deleting required bufferyards adjacent to Lot 2 shown as Phase III and adjacent to Lot 4 shown as Phase II; deleting Item #4a (maximum allowable width); deleting Item#6 (building slope line encroachment); anotate Item#11 (label all side and rear building lines)rear of building#4 to face south • property line of Lot 3, designating a 10' rear building line along the south line of Lot 3 adjacent to building#4. a STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated November 27, 1996. • L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-151 SP.WPD • • • .,.. - • . 4 I • I "":"-I"-I""l'-1,`' ' — -0.,.- Li .....-I-- 1 ... . .- I -400 ::,..-:... c'2, •t - \it,/ ,.ki t41 aLL sce,..cr A-695 • - Ito , 1,019 .\*<0 - • • I i i i I ! • • h. .. .....T. ..,,,IWi.SKYINIE,Itilin V 9 ,i ..-L. • .totx 1.,..0:,......7.........•„.. ,...• . 4 i i ! .§-- 1- •4, -LI...! I I • • , , 1 1- i • I .... .... 1 ' .; ..... --i"---• .-. I71-1"12-1 I .... ' 1 it. ? assimitio.. ...r _.,voi .. ., , ....itt....t.14.7".7:...,i: 71tr..-6 'C i . 1 , •• . U. '‘, , . . I 1•51/0 I ifanIMIE " 0 g I i ! ! c -,...-1( 4... .41....,- **'- WIIttiniaciziwis,,‘ --. ---- 5-i — -i...- 1 alt.; 1 .., ! 1 • ! i -, - * • . i .1• --- --I-- . r•-r- !I n •v..: 1 i It ! 11 _ '-'-q40 ••••,...issfion.. r- 4. ill 1..P1(1 I \ i . t, stk• ;.i" --±-. - e •-_.•1 .1 •,, i ,__.6 t Li -4-- I --..or„..-f-- ---116 11 1.---- . id-111. : -c• licAo-r - ,..,, ......„ . r - _____-. ---: a -1, ••10,0,108,4t. --- iMill;-LT-- - 1 14. i .,. s. . ,---r t.: ......100.00:001, o.v.fgs. 2C ! i I -. ; It 1 n',\ goi ... . az NT— i --• • • , 9- b..........,..4 _ i . .. ••'Y I i n j i ..., -!. i ; • ' • ITI-:1---1N- -- - • ' v - . ... •. , • • -A ! I. I -i- Iii:/louniargum. 1' • iiIiiii It Lit• if. i ! ; • ', i i a !iim:mil......-....;........4 • • 11 i r.••••5_ •na•ali•• 06 3C1 1 A - t t /06,3.01,e etc 5C iiirilV. ' . 1 .3,0110,11 I i ___. --b . C.• ---/----1-r-rt._.. .101 . „ 0.?.....i 5 r. ..„...... ....„ .... / ...4,„ .„........f. . _--(:. i • • L i 1 tilig, uuI m„_; x --1.6-6-.519mY.' •11115iii Si .....- ...."• .• : -1.-•'•1:43 . I 11111101 1 i ' • • ;• , I a .,--,_-_. -. - -- --''..____---- 0 - -mown 1-4.`.: - ',•,...4 _ -,..-.. ....n'•'.-1...•-• =1.i..'..' -3.1111= • , il il) si IA . 3r V K i 51:1' •...4..,;-• ei UST l'i i'.,?ilf.01.-05 OM 6 nc iii.' ...,.:.43 a•c t, ..t. :. 9.1/. 30 3- ligif 31)1 t5 ni../..1 302 1 1\ 0.W. 1 - parkway R. . 14". SO Byron Nelson .... /. 4 - ----------------------------__--_-2me 1 . 3 I'' '''• Y ° 4.23 M. *31',.na . 0 0 • • . IF t.-.) a „,Ill e iMINEr,...,,, .°if• 1 • 29 I' ."-•• -1:- 21 1.4......s. • SIN , ,Ni) • wr ...0,, t f.o.... .......:‘,.,../.0......, - e ..... ./. °MEDI 14 ....... 20 r 0 I33 If 4 nc al 2531 i41•P 50\• , ,i •,!, -1.,), s. ...,„, i . • Fil ! . ,,zancytt VgA_45;2.1., ,K.rldWr la Mit 11%._.... . 1:1 illffillraletIgill. r ...•-•-••-/ I ILI' 0..31 tA. ____ 111111ii i 10..,tiossweir 1100',111"alkuilli., V°i ,er.,..wog 1..: IP 'lea' " •41901111111114.---..twum4111\) , 0 a ji lijr. 1444. t.: ---......-/ 24 0111,0 P, i - i,---1 41 Gnikt.,_Ugliiiirtilig f-..; i It ow•.ir '1%011:-:IA .1,..-,,..tr .-- SRACKY A-AIIM g I ,/ •li V4Pibilii 1101.1,ai;n14 •• - . 11.11111111111.11111.331 V NY' i ' • 1,- ; II 6 nr ;:-...! r II__ :,...,...),.. ..., !--,-,- ;.- • 11111 Kt 1, .10 1II ! ! 1 tioravada- • ._ ,.„ .,...... fa . .......1._•....,. . twig. , ,... i 1 i • / 4............ j....,...L.. - - i a. I ..7; 't, •-/ '!.I i - .----k,-- i yi :„,......;...4. . 1 -7+. ; - . i.. • -e.o.m.- 1 . - . " . ' I i - ,. •,:,. ._..i._ tfl EC !i , . •••• i ..!, ; h-Vt' S!"r1-1-43- -. GA' 1 IMAM • . . .4 . , fruiiii , .-r--. .„'".1.4_. . : b , . .--4.-• : 9° •-•• .•7 - ' ... i i ..ftp,.WI'. . : El G !' •f• . ,, r •1.1 r 1_. . •-i.` T-:,-1• ;.',7 . .*'0... ,:, 1 . . - 11 .3(...---_, 1 1,,....•i 1.. b-st - . . ,r,. — ?,409- ', .-,:..--- 1 ..1, 4.--'1 ' ;=•.: • •_._. A-----\\. ,. . • ...._, ._ ... • i? 1 A• .... _ „ , , i k ./ 1 A___Olp .--,--•-••••- 111 I.' (--4_-,3 , , ••• cn ..., cg ,f,,i --•• . ,-;01.•._ --. ;/-y•.'.: .., i.. `,...., •.! ! ! • . m; • TRACT MAP ___,---„,---._n _ •_,,_. . . . 11 \.\\•:-..,-,!..-,-.., .-N- n- i-)v- .-" , 1-4- '•-1-- - -- .1i . / / , ADJACENT OWNERS . • • - AND ZONING C2 1 C 1 '-i - 0 •— —-r- --- —-----; F 3q`----- 2�- -\ �\ \'fir SUUTHLAKE BLVD -- 4-- ' --- - - -- ►`\ �- --. �� TR 1 :TR 5a2a: J . f 5: 6 • • I • 12 13 PHASE I ' AG • SA 1 A 4 7 • •• 1u10PUD98 . - 1 1 OWNERS 1. Diamond I Limited LS 2. State of Texas 3. H. Liao 7 . 4. State of Texas • 5. State of Texas • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#9 6. State of Texas LAURA MIKLOSKO 7. J. Baker • 8. J. Baker SPIN REPRESENTATIVE #10 \ - 9. FKA Bear Creek Communities AL MORIN 10. Timarron Land Corp. - 11. FKA Bear Creek Communities S12. State of Texas 13. State of Texas -.H 1- !ill SOUTHLAKE BLVD. • ---------- / arn ---� AI1■ 7 R]•A■ , /i■] ]AMA M�(�� Jfle ] .Ot ] • t el I LW LLI 1111111111111111118 s .:,-.:11 I..i���a 1 IR UK—► 1. illdtrili 0 I .t iiiiiii..4*1 ' .7_,-• b 1 lit Do z \I Ili Ilk! • ii C I O li! Ziiii 'iiiP ir"itf.,Tw.1 A e a f!— p %i . C • •° 1 if i ::::••: �,' ` _n.,e■y4 .:'7 0 N 1 .1 ,I I • < AIN0 0 O ` g • tilii i E�:.> L qT % e •s-: : \�\ L 1 W sl A ` fig§ >z ■cram.■ ]vv Z I 1 1f, r— —, S n j ��� o.- it r ro I —\ • /7 / ; t' •----mew■ 6g 3 --• N �i/ � , . n■u.■� III' '�` IIIIII11IIl1IIIIl1IIIl1II111111111111111_ ■n as• MO. :�;ill C4 nCD t=3 p (-) i 1 g 17 11,1; . ..- -..:_.--11:: I i Q, ' CO 1 i ���l C C CCCCC C C C CCSKICC ` b s ga 3 'a C.O 4! 11 g ' X CO gi g &$rid igfl Hill i!3 g ■__.1=11■1_■ IMI T n 1; 1 THE VILLAGE AT TIMARRON iMP iv r z PHASE 1,H.&m not $ • N " q E S.EC.SOVTHIAKE BLVD.&BYRONNELSONPKWY. ii ray • SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS 119 11 >i ._�■ .�.. .,. ,., ...,, ■a■��■ l �STT S {p }R fr 4?� ( 3 `F}q}J TyF',:}s?zg u } ?,�ttYR?az£?Ff??}•Fg?tx<ttt?Yf?it?e+:}f}-2''tXs2 T,?q}.T. 2sE 2-t?if t'?i tif?'ii'?R �?r4r,"si tFivt}4g?m7..v.tTtEli>,,•T<?m i.�f.,,�,�� �£8}� ,•��+,i, t'¢,.,,?�€� � �,;,+ ,�, �,,, ,1�,, F ,E..ti,, ,,,�,.,,�,iIF1,�,, ,,t,,F, ,,F., t;`.'},, ,.t,E��,,�,•,},+ ,f,t;F,,4+,,,:�F,,,FI., ,.4 t, ,,t, .,.f r.�, ,<•f+2 ,jj v.,, .�.• t, •v t .,?,+.t, Ii`, k "t,: {{2: i:a•tf;t ,2, f .i, .+2 22 F, ,u, i • ,t,,+?t�t, ,} h+ 22, a, N+2 .>,..., .:��2.�`ii��t� ,�,t,>............�'i;.:`-� .,.,.+..,,,... ..,.LL...,.;>?!i':.....,s2 2�t2�ii:\_,.......,.., ..,.,..,.._.........,.........,.._..;:c;�,._..,.>........._....,.,.,...,.,.,.,.,,.,.,......_,...........,,,>i�:.,_..._.......�232:._..........,. •0 • • oL 50UTNLAKC BLVD. P.Y.NO.1709 170 j170 - „,.- f N 69'4519•C 270.91 L - ,4,•5 ar.un•C 6 7 9 ,° �POB - -a_ 7' SI 69__ IO �.r LOCATIO I m w el. _ I_ IT h i 3 ao I LOCATION YAP M�05 I f,. I BLOCTK/6I o, 1.) 41 _I6 i r 1,216 Sr. 2 I ..SGAL[IN FEET I ••✓gy 8 .,I .v14.nv." 1143C C I AI I W I I I 0044 DI N M SOLI Dw D 9r A lal K, n mo.,1141.11043....tD."A�K,.9".9INo9ol M,.a.9D.y N. :,04D° V. I.,°p; I a A..ICNI a rt„r.oalTy,Ort„•.nma o F. ! I 2 I w f a[ac41do{0,.DCa fAM,Dro wwt Yr PG A..C.M Iw CO 14Iff K,K,TI to 4/MCI N(MCi10 v „MO 03..1f J 8 OOM,O.90,IxOar to N amer* ak wR r 17.004 axaem WIC.'NO IDJ1a'4.4 ru ONAM a"' „ h 39.69 I I •) 01 n n 1D•9...OS, 10341/L I440 C1414.AI4 M M 5 69v9'sr[ BLOCK CO t4.e •I A f q,•DO 14 M o D •Irt 0014 FR CI M do Yl v LOT 3 We Daro•n 0 T•4 4e M SOua FOCI Cr.4 01 o 11200 D OW4I P 00•a+A uD ran M.v0tn ,y 00, W --130.3e3 Sr. I PT 40.4E fill fl OW D Cr�.tTVIR.A1mm ro 4l la u MCC 1 a11HO 30•000 ` I 1 I 5 DD'10'99• w°Nnv; J7.D1 ; Tl.woi M fPw V(d YO WA u Nn p16' I 10( .•t c I 'W '�--� - r ti /C mMO M 1034434110:03001 CV D10/33"Pala TAXI CV WOO°pwm,°009 MI0, 01 IM,4 rtnr .040.0.r 4.3.31n u C31.2.Pe t n Ii C. x[I I W4.4000O6 904;03.°11L1,RSW49 w v0.VS nN; q M rt•'AS[r,a (TIT CV SQltIl4T I 63`vA 20 94 n,e 011t.L 9 CwstfuR4t Mrt+O,r6i,m 1CV5 PG ICSC I •'1 C I TOT a 0.a•I Jr' I I Rv r•• o• M.;f w4-of lr•.Da M mrn,amR.w[v fro r.tl,ACM Tun M.VC.n,re•w,V.Cr vrR TN,-m O�INC c I. DLO RaI 1 .[b,.D �I•>;In sD4w alma Incl.l DY4„.o1O1114,rar T9 oY•A Z I;•..I 0 I I�, I DC..�4.000:,I;wD ,.4;93 .o .D a.�4 .a �M� .w 2643 _ I 3 1 d 4 ....FA MI.O,ayrYNpR :P/Ir I I I 1331 1 w `�Irf6 03 rMdR A G"'ClQi06P'"`TYL CDR.(„tOerf s a9 Mv„441 UIO.101 /M fmP O I R 10L•.4 P M�NI T9• 00110 W'mC MICRO COrin M MM,P N!>4w•9 WC C•.I M 69V9'S1•N N 001?09'[ f4 I4 Wf MICRO, 43 ip 'ila n"+`m,CM I I I 151.5 I I - r.n.,ucrR v ma IK M I9YD.w9,A.=,.,n n4 CADS °•`�• -°r n�V`riai wm tl�i.e,.,•Oil A'rRf v I N 69Y9'S1•w 4 ,H,Mi0 fpY1r�' nTm R P IR,rtt •R v,s>nRt A tWl 4nNSUw. \V1 7.R.11 I 1 3 44341.L•Damn v FAO r,n D+2734•0T I I I • m..a,110 I R100 a,a, R+1045.01 'AI•SN•IfA.•wns9x uro a.nfr0• L.A17.66 T=2E).67 • /I LCO DT E I _ TAM Or or C B.N 11'36.2T C I I ry I0 w I"�.MT1.0.104D 340013,•I44 MAX•Ar*0D•M / BLOCK 60 I. • C w'd"r` 7 M•W>��m IL ( LOT 2 i -- t79,613 Sr, g M.morx Kr woo Hp 306 v WI;M-MIN-,CM. I I ' • I I I I APPA0VE0 6T D E // 1'4 / I; PLAIM610 AND 70MNG CwYIS90N • WWI MAX w re,a M Y•rt v 11•A1 H !I DATE: 044fa mr.. C„::=vC.iD Rai ivnA>T 0 / qq / SJY,�'.•"•IInC,-...rv:t_r I 2 o r 'I iI II CHAIRMAN / ,' a/,n vR ,v I I • CITY SECRETARY 0 1'-/ ._ _ .__.•_-._ _- __ I •R _I. / �i 0�,4 S' �:�� _ _-_-I 5 6P/5'2-'9 W •77.9a _1._.I; n. I / + ,�., r.. R , A o° / I; FINAL PLAT I S(. •n]A9 = D, Cf ' .'� / , \\` i '....:'","�'".t, 1 i i . LOTS 2,3 4 BLOCK 80 . ;I • TIMARRON ADDITION R I PHASE 5 �. . i /• I e ,.. '� '"'I - _I I NO1(5: BEING A PARTIAL REPLAT OF _ _ \, ?� •R L10.aRan...,ir.0.rwI.ar.,e•n4..1 wsr n..,In Rmc..x,,.ae BLOCK I. LOTS IA, 1B,AND IC ��\ ]-: i, • / • •I 0)0 5 4•.1w Cr W.V.ROO.WA,u 1w-1w 0000 rm0 M+.a CM.a an M. OF DILL PLACE Sr•wo..nA, ,I,w.R wu«.;.F a w,c"1p1ae�`a aOUI;OWA+.w.RR In 'r.io°�6 OUT Of TIE w M rlrat.."1• 04 10100'0at O.W.KNIGHT SURVEY.ABSTRACT NO.699 \0, ., 2 / 'i..I.nI I • I 'I I alallp 00. •M vl..•[Ir Irr.rc..Omo.f....4 wre L 4 rtco40.c44,• Ill THE G ` In,,v M N1 wCwi v:=twm,1IW. CITY Or SOUTHLAKC,,ARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS 7 • \ / rTnlrMP o/1,Im.,+n M.NROI n rRTLI wD RVrp,6.N...Rw O,,.rt V.vD '" �� K.ua 4 r.f,Ac.D.4.I9ro>vnDK+Aw ww0.4 rtwm 7.627 ACRES /3 LOTS / - ' 14�t.• I-I I .h+M art MaD'MO.. rtYM,M al M R �wM 007 0 6M a�nlµ�on�° pMNCR/pCKIOPCR: IIYARROH LAND THE CORPORATION 0404. 300[.CARPENTER fRCEWAT SUITE 1425 IRVING,TEXAS 73062 (714)791-3333 FA., _ _ ENGINE.R/SURVTYOR. REED OCT C car'P..NB°rg°" CNN6 6 6V6D455,RAC. u05/.AI 11110 Iv.9l;uor .n OCTOBER 1996 , City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Oise No.: ZA 96-151 Revised Review No: One Date of Review: 11/27/96 Project Name: Site Plan -The Village at Timarron,Phase I,Lot 3,Block 60, Timarron Addition Ph. 5 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: - Venus (Drews) Partners V, L.P. T.L. Callaway Architects 5440 Harvest Hill Rd., Suite 150 17738 Preston Rd. Suite 125 Dallas, Texas 75230 • Dallas, Texas 75252 Phone: (214) 490-3977 Phone : (214) 732-6085 Fax : (214) 392-1109 Attn:.John Drews Fax : (214) 732-8058 Attn: Jeff Carroll CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/11/96 AND WE.. OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFI•CATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. • 9C n...rk ......tw:n:::::::rv':::.•::,•:::::.:iii:•:•::+:8:4iii:::::::::w:::•:. 1. Show platted and unplatted.properties along the north line of F.M. 1709. Include the owner's name, zoning and land use.designation(L.U.D.). • 2. Correct the required.bufferyards and plantings according to the attached bufferyard calculation chart.• . The minimum required bufferyards and plantings must be provided. The required bufferyards adjoining Ph: II and III have not been provided. (P& ZAction 12/19/96: amend to delete required bufferyards adjacent to Lot 2 shown as Phase III and adjacent to Lot 4 shown as Phase II) • • 3. • Clearly distinguish all areas intended for interior landscape area on the graphic by shading. 4: The driveway at the northeast corner of the site intersecting the F.M. 1709 does not meet the geometry requirements of the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. The proposed driveway does not comply as - follows: a. • The device shown to restrict the ingress/egress to right in\right out\left in does not comply • • with the required geometry. Provide the geometry as shown on the attached Appendix 7.of the Driveway Ordinance. * The driveway spacings and stacking depths conform to the Concept Plan for this site approved . by City Council Nov. 5, 1996. The City Council also waived the TIA requirement with the • approval of the Concept Plan.. 5. The common access easement stubbing into the east property line of the site must encompass•the adjoining drive lane and the driveway intersecting F.M.1709.The CAE must be centered on and 2'wider . • than the entire width of the proposed driveway and drive lane. 6. All buildings on Lot 3 which exceed 20' in height(UBC standard measurement) or.exceed one story must be setback from the east property line such that no portion of the buildings encroach above a 4 : • 1 slope line. Buildings No. 1,2,and 3 encroach above the slope line as shown on the provided building elevations. (P & ZAction 12/19/96: delete) • City of Southlake,Texas ill Label all pedestrian walks,malls,outdoor dining areas and open areas for use by tenants or the public. Include the type of surface material and widths where applicable. 8. Add or correct the following items in the Site Data Summary Chart: Area of Open Space Area unencumbered by buildings_and pavements Percentage Open Space Percentage of net lot area unencumbered by buildings and pavements Start Construction Month/Year- Finish Construction Month/Year Maximum Bldg.Height (Measured UBC standard, max. ht. allowed is 359 9. Label all entrances and exits to buildings. 10. Show the orientation, type and height of lighting. .. 11. Label the all side and rear building lines. (P & ZAction 12/19/96: rear of building#4. to face south property line of Lot 3, designating a 10'rear building line along the south line of Lot 3 adjacent to building#4.) . . 12. Show the location of all trash dumpsters noting the type and height of screening device. All trash . dumpsters must be located at the side or rear of buildings, gated and screened by a minimum 8' masonry wall similar to the primary building. •Provide a fire hydrant within,the landscape parking island southeast of building No. 2 and within the landscape parking island southwest of building No. 3 per Fire Department requirements. Designate the drive lane south of building•No. 3 and between building 3 and 4 as fire lane. • 14. Provide a site grading plan showing the proposed finished grade of the site;with contour intervals not • exceeding two(2)feet. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points,including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, finish floors, etc. Include . . directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and label all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type and flow line elevation. Also show centerline of water courses and existing drainage easements. . • Note the benchmark used for the topographical.information. This should correspond to a City approved benchmark. 15. Provide a utility plan showing all proposed water and- sewer lines and proposed connections to existing lines. Include:proposed fire hydrants on the plan. • • 16. The following changes are needed with regard to building elevation plans: A. Label the scale of the drawing.Provide a"plan view"of each facade below the elevation view. dimension all wall lengths and offsets. ' B. Distinguish the location of exterior construction materials to be used on the elevation. • Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.a is required on all building facades. City of Southlake,Texas C. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation of the north, east, south and west facades of all buildings according to the requirements Ordinance 480, Section 43.c.l.c. Compliance with the • articulation requirements are listed in the attached articulation evaluation chart.All dimensions. used in the evaluation were estimated by scale. P&ZACTION:• December 5, 1996;Public Hearing continued to December 19, 1996.due to Resolution 95-24. December 19, 1996;Approved(6-0-1) subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated % November 27, 1996, amending Item #2 (required bufferyards and plantings) deleting required bufferyards adjacent to Lot 2 shown as Phase III and adjacent to Lot 4 shown as Phase II;deleting Item #4a(maximum allowable width); deleting Item #6(building slope line encroachment); anotate Item #11 (label all side and rear building lines) • rear of building#4 to face south properly line of Lot 3, designating a 10'rear building line along the south line of Lot 3 adjacent to building#4. * This review is based on the "C-2"Zoning District Regulations. * " The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a final plat must be filed in the•County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan along with the . building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,'Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. ip * Please be aware that all mechanical units must be fully screened of view from F.M.1709 and any residential properties. . * No review of the landscaping is intended with this plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the • requirements of Ord. 544.will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a.request for a new C.O. will require that the number parking spaces required for the proposed use is met and that the parking areas meet the."all. . weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance. • Although.not required by ordinance, staff.would appreciate placing "Case No. ZA 96-151" in the. • lower right corner for;ease of reference. • City of Southlake,Texas * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on.12/23/96. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until • the following submittal schedule.All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Bufferyard corrections; Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Venus (Drews)Partners V, L.P. • T.L. Callaway Architects L:\W P-FILES\REV\96\96-15 I S P.1 • .City of Southlake,Texas SUMMARY CHART-BUFFERYARDS IIIBufferyard Canopy Accent Shrubs Fence/Screening ocation Length Width - Type Trees Trees Height&Material North- Required 216' 20'-0 9 7 301 none Provided* East- Required 495' 10'-F 1 15 30 40 F 1 fence and/or 8' screening device Provided* South- Required. 403' . _. 5'-A 4 8 32 none Provided* .. West- Required 464' 5'-A 5 9 37 none Provided* North- Required 152' 5'-A 2 3 12 none • Provided* *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Width of driveway deducted from bufferyard per Ord.480, Sec.42.4f. Other Comments: • Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W.,shrubs obtaining a • mature height of three feet(39 or greater must be planted at a minimum spacing of thirty inches (30'9 on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas, . • • S i Articulation Evaluation No.1 Case No.ZA 96-151 Date of Evaluation:11/27/96 • Elevations for Village at Timarron,Ph I,Lot 3,Block 60,Timarron Ph.5 . Received 11/27/96 ONo.1 ring: North Wall ht.= 30 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 90 23 74% Yes 90 43 52% Yes Min.artic.offset 5 3 40% • No 5 15 200% Yes Min.artic.length 6 10 67% Yes 11 15 36% Yes R.Side-facing: West Wall ht.= 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required , Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 60 54 10% Yes 60 33 45% Yes Min,artic.offset 3 10 233% Yes 3 15 40 l% Yes Min.artic.length 14 3 79% No 8 29 ;63% Yes L.Side-facing East Wall ht.= 20 , Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 60 54 10% Yes 60 33 45% Yes Min.artic.offset 3 10 233% Yes 3 15 400% Yes Min.artic.length 14 3 79% No 8 29 263% . Yes Rear-facing: South Wall ht.= 30 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 90 73 19% Yes 90 43 52% Yes Min.artic.offset 5 0 "100% No 5 15 200% Yes Min.artic.length 18 0 100% No 11 15 36% Yes *Bank drive thru canopy was not considered in the evaluation • Building No.2 Front-facing: West Wall ht= 20 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? . Max.wall length 60 62 3% No 60 62 3% No Min.artic.offset • 3 3 • 0% Yes - 3 3 0% Yes Min.artic.length 3 4 33% Yes . 16 .15 6% No . R.Side-facing: South Wall ht.= 22 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? • ngth 66 54 18% Yes 66 46 30% Yes ffset, 3 10 ,233% Yes 3 13 333% Yes Min. lc.length 14 10 29% No 12 25 •108% Yes L.Side-facing North Wall ht.= 22 Horizontal articulation • Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required • Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length • 66 . 64 3% . Yes 66 25 62% Yes Min,artic.offset 3 5 67% Yes 3 2 33% No • Min.attic.length 16 5 69% No 6 23 283% Yes Rear-facing: East Wall ht.= 22 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? • Max.wall length 66 64 3% Yes 66 64 3% Yes . Min.artic.offset 3 12 300% Yes 3 • 2 33% No • Min.artic.length 16 20 25% Yes 16 20 25% Yes • • • III Building No.3 • Front-facing: North Wall ht.= 19 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? S length 57 32 44% Yes 57 38 33% Yes .offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 3 0% Yes .length 4 8 100% Yes 4 14 250% Yes R.Side-facing: West Wall ht.= 19 • Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta _Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 57 61 7% No 57 46 19% Yes Min.antic.offset 3 5 67% Yes 3 3 0% Yes Min,artic.length 15 5 67% No 12 10 17% No . L.Side-facing East Wall ht= 22 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided 'Delta Okay? Max.wall length 66 56 15% Yes 66 _ 56 15% Yes Min.attic.offset 3 5 67% Yes 3 12 300% Yes Min.attic.length 14 5 64% , No 14 24 71% Yes Rear-facing: South Wall ht= •2-2 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? • Max.wall length 66 53 20% Yes 66 48 27% Yes Min.attic.offset 3 12 300% Yes 3 15 400% Yes • Min.attic.length 13 20 54% Yes 11 15 36% Yes Building No.4 . • Front-facing: North Wall ht.= 19 • Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 57 23 60% Yes 57 26 54% Yes , Min.attic.offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 12 300% Yes Min.attic.length 6 12 100%, Yes 7 23 229% Yes R.Side-facing: West Wall ht.= 19 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided • Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 57 25 56% Yes 57 ' • 35 39% Yes Min.artic.offset 3 , 3 0% Yes 3 4 33% Yes Min.attic.length 5 14 180% Yes 6 12 100% Yes , I ring East Wall ht.= 22 Horizontal articulation t Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Wenth 66 25 62% Yes 66 35 47% Yes Min.attic,offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 4 33% Yes Min.attic.length 5 14 180% Yes 6 12 100% Yes Rear-facing: South Wall ht.= 19 • Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required , Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? • Max.wall length 57 23 60% Yes 57 26 54%• Yes Min.attic.offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 13 333% Yes Min.attic.length 6 12 100% Yes 7 23 229% Yes i • • ,. tt-11...tN. li:;21( 524 MeV • 110100/ :Alt\. 10101, . 0 f.. �.by. 1006 ID 0 U +N location Ha .t..LA Emmy ]GL.ItT1 % .f :cTum —corm. R :.11::::2:61744s4pit m 47 Ar •••• ,1 .!•••...• 'op... _ MD MD rl ''.':: ;.ti i I I I 111.1.r..• .7:" ,, 0 ci 100113344 .I L / I IL /p tau 4• 1 ear■mtlo■■ Qg 1~ , jL j % sidoossiaraivranklinallidT P1 I ' v i 0 t s2.47173 W.rn 001 a aim ioa ".¢ O m , - MIA u. ..so.� • s.c,.snam.. I I ��. I • r • = t 1 . O PHASE III rAn61 MUM* n.`...., rr • ,m► • Irma 1@•,�Y® �. gra4 `-I- LA�.ra sAo aLAnrxm Ono ■ " ' �•. IImu 4 .,�1mAfA •%'� rI '..I�i1 00,E,. ,,30,� • 1010 0 ..m.� , a1.. -liner. +r•O'. ],1,1C L.[�) r,. :R �[ maMlT swa LOT tr LAD.-100 Wei MI MG T�I AEA MitC.010 h I I .• _ �' • i ATMAD m.OAT a•,rs. • um 0 .m I I / s ,f •• 10 fur a• me p`rz• mra -iwo K. uu I I 1j ( . '; 4Sdal II•r ` •i 'RR...,,.�•;,�..1. ••••T-.,.,1a.. 1A, PHASE II - - a ■ ■� .. . �m:ci+w� �v,L�et o - LAO_w 1013100R • I �. LOT u .. • = A ? `°'"`.rm�a�'.'w�r-4r ti, 4 ��� O • c�vlww Y 40 i MUM FOCI r-i Lm ....;:: la veme(D,ewa)Pcm,sv.1.P, e `^` I 1 I •••• � doDcewrRnlgcirruap BYRONNEBSONPARgWAY i 1 'taro* \ 00 nomR.T�c n r •arlomcs ..COW. OTT OF.a .Aa wffi e .•u�. .n "r�'w"t~`a"'oa'","^"r `. 0.111'11 o:+rc • Iso®oci tam■Iaglmos I .1. am. p `°.: „ ' o'er ...,,..«Rr•01201e4 R' -34 1caarn LOOM.•,1001 ••.••n�n•u.. -_ A.0 Rf 0 \ 101114 00 m.t mb 1 • B 1.. Ohw.. Ot» II e MT .IO.V.MY • • • b .RL • . • fJlfl. .1000 },L(, • RT K W wiz.. per,..1�/p11�. ; ; Me .�}� ` WOO Mg r mm rCtA.M1 0MY 00w.q alA.iHl' SUE ' 1M Ilw11i • PLAN I C'D NOV 111996 mower ow,.rnmat u..b.. ' - wR•1m 1400 0. TSID. 24 44 LA N•IF. wQ ` m.0 4.,.RI. TL.. a. Y z• N.se. • • SP-3 Case No.ZA 96-134 •■■��• �atr.tuna r R+RMA ■_c . ■ on 4 �. gnnn,� __ .�. 1.1,,, 6 - - - - r _ _,,,,. :,._. . .... . ..... BUILDING ONE aay..,auo n n n n r __ _ , r * '-� .��• / I�\ \ Imo\ AWL \ \\ I.IIIIIMEMEM � - d CAALLAWky It. . I IN . , _1 V • ii !I!■■■■ ' 'Mil• ®AR cumicrs BUILDING TWO z acw•.tam, r/ 1 ar"_cam 0 . , E. ® E � ITE7i l I I _ _❑ ■uill ❑ n 1l - ° . . i if,2, ` BUILDING THREE rn I IST OF MATFRIN E. C Lican ernal ioaao not ocsal M1M Ttf SICK LL4.0.0 r• Omega V n M.Pa m • wont RE We. t. ,mTNLIE _ • afrnan r.an aonrn nEN-Mann �_ C Wyly yCa41 .�• ate+-aaan+ _► - aOaewta MCIN MIME■ . . oNarv■[' INN TRU _M -_. �+ �_. �- • -�� n•Ernorr. carom.. GR C � Ir a�•wt r,••, •`• '11.1 �/ ��_ r.,,..,.. ��� ���• ,.,.,ay a.rtwof■awu•■=CMFLBVA770NS ,,,.. .". ..,,, ',,,.../MMif nil ® Il,.,,, ,,,I. . .. ..,'�I .¢aa lP'OOTT. a� •.,t GCU..NOCM•Nr414:4 .-��� 0.14nn000aaao STONE CO..tort_Y- BUILDING FOUR REC'D NOV 11 1996 ' aWIC.Lsaff aa• I DD-1 • c. City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT • January 3, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-156 PROJECT: Revised Preliminary Plat/Timarron Addition, Phase 5 STAFF CONTACT: Tom Elgin, Planner II, 481-5581, ext. 753 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition, Phase 5, being 23.82 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tract 2A5,portions of Tracts 2A3,2B and 5D,and Lots 1 B and 2B of Spring Creek Acres. The plat proposes 58 residential lots and 2 common areas. , . LOCATION: On the west side of the proposed Byron Nelson Parkway, approximately 450' north of the intersection of Byron Nelson Parkway and Lilac Lane. OWNER AND APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation CURRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D. No. 1" Residential Planned Unit Development AND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) 100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: December 19, 1996; Approved(6-0-1) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated December 13, 1996, deleting Item#6 (Street "I" cul-de-sac length). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Preliminary Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated December 13, 1996. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-156PP.WPD 0 8D-1 gli Carter :: Burgess Consultants in Engineering, Architecture, Planning and the Environment • December 6, 1996 Mr. Dennis Killough City of South Lake 667 N. Carroll Avenue . Southlake, Texas 76092 Reference: Revised Preliminary Plat Timarron Phase 5 Dear Dennis: • A com lete resubmittal acka a for the revisedplat for Timarron Phase 5 P p 9 preliminary was sent to you on November 25, 1996. The purpose of this revision is to reconfigure several streets and lots within the subdivision in order that a number of specimen oak trees will be preserved. This reconfiguration results in a reduction of 9 lots within this subdivision. • I would be happy to answer any questions you may have. Very truly yours, CA ER & BURGESS, INC. -.9-®2-. exy:. - Todd M. ssen, P.E. Associate TMJ/dmy 96238801.L06 ,RECD DEC 10 1996 S 8D-2 Carter& Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75247-4951 (2141 638-0145 Metro (214) 263-2019 Fm< (214) 638-042-- ' r-'1''',1-71-11-1L S.- '. W W •' .- . . '.... ) iiiiii •I' . ..to\z.1 1 1 1 24.91 AC- 1::,' ,:•:::.1 9. . ., . . • 1 4 1 •NP.,(•\(0 .....lammovv, • 1 •s . NJ ••Aj •-t•.,•''s\I, v.. HALL . thrION W.W. ALL \,\• 0, (1 ! 1 ! I . 1,-..-•b-oitqL -L. ...--- . Tsurf/Ei• A-687 p9r .9.12527 A-695 35 Ac ./c. 1 1 ailni0111;/"T•lafar ...... ..1.4 _ i 1 ! ! I I ! - i i ! S. 4•-• i ,it . • .......,„„.....,:. \-\°' ,-4-.,-....,A, 5.-4„ .ii /:-..„,---. ! ,---,... 1 i . 1,i. i • ;., , -4. i • .-- . k. , .,•-•„ • s.„,,....„.af ---,,.....s„..,....„..,,,,,,,„. i -., .! J i i V tr-) '''' 1 j i 0' '.'•I i i • c'T' ! 1 ' L.:. , v • IA 5 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; ; 1 1 •••••-rr•-1-. 06' Z .' i .... 1 1 A2 0011 IV - .1=6 , '`. • . ' 0 g.t.,,,,,,..i 1 I Lic"11-4,1-11-T-1 , ma 11.,./.0 _.4._•__ i . i i i . • i ._____._. 1 ! „ iiiii , .. , •:...I.,_ . • , mil es.uutatmill...._ Iiiii _ , -+- - - rl 4 .1 1 i A `• '• 1 --,E1-:_:.., i i i i • , - --1----. . r--- i.: • •. • ! / \ ' -1-,---, _.:. i i 0 i _._ , _ _ , ti• .1), . • 1 ii i 1 .- .1 .--1.-.1 --f--- - 'I 1 1 4‘ .s-...!L--1•.-.4 ---6--- ,,.------ 09 -- --- -ir" -- 3A .4"1114,,mcroaaRec:4141111 •-- ._. ,I,Igis.,- • . ._1_ 1 . , • • ‘ ' 5 1.,---•-•---A6 .--jf ._ .-utrff--f • -5 -, -• 5 + ........ •-• . i .! • il -1--f---0- -4 \ \ .0. • dair.4111111. '.. I I i i i 3A1 i i i ‘ \ \ 7 I i. n : i ,..... 3E . a.,703..1...msA• 3A1A TENNIAL ! ! I I t N i Vii/ ! ! ..4..• I .\ ''r-• i i - --i.I-17'1,E:g itt7TaMMAIH A Lgeice4 -.i pARK :-. 1 . - • i . iiii ! ! ! ! 313I 16 1 , -•, • -i•T•2.4- ! 1 /.. tttttt f f I i 4 0- • ...s - . I or.imais :in. •••• `• -,. 1G-ce-t.---t---i---i 22 Ac .• -_ 49 302 384 1: • 7, • co -. ., i• .-4- f ' 271.21;KIN=01•AiRRA..:Ii .4.! - . .....,...;‘,. rio EEL , • ft:,.,00 , 4,.......• /--,t ..... ., i -,...,.- i 5i i ; -- -.1 . -y, i • : __ i . ,.... __ 1 r 1 --__ •.,.......- , . . .. O 40 RI . • _Mi1 ..,4 :.„, : -,,•, . .1 4A 3C 30 • . 1 3F1 erl 7A1 • LK) • .'If...-.-- -. .-• -... -7-411 -...A.'1•,;t:'A.Z...10UICARKE--.. : -j- 7-- - - _ . 1 ! i ! t, / , 3C 5f 5E • 59 501 502 ' 50 3A 3A1 3C 3E1 -••• ..,1 • i 'Al 2 , 4'3c2 i• il i . z66 ..1 -GPI! il •-i A. 381 ., . i----1,..--1•-. / • 5 1 ._+_. \. • „..,J : o A - •. ,. 2.95 3 .31 Ac 3.56 Ac .- .i" 1‘•i 10 k 6 Ac z5,.......D1 ys Ac .5'A,;•/ pl U k .." 4--• ro 3- Kir. Ad .k.1095.-' - - • i !i -,,. \ • , I 3D1 12 ' 1-4-71-÷4c-i. r• '',. ' :' I. -.; a Roo 3N .'.... . ...... S 1 Irk , .Ps i, - -- 3N1 _ • '..I ...._ 15 Ac 1E11 I N -.1 .....r. 111:s ----..-' -.1 •-••5......._:._.,-• ..,.0;.1 E CR ; 34i, .0;lyt•'11: IiiirmAlliiiii..f. • : .... . • .• .-i'.....• „ • 3 4iitte• 'Ie r; r,- -, •-••-.. • • .1..... • • -.....4/.""44 -• • • • I , 3H AI ' COURT EA T I • 28 t . . N 51 sit.'4-1, mAPI wrs trim:14 21 Ac-•\ . . • ( 3E . , ' 111=1-. 14' 1/i N I n I k s-' •.• , vou 2, . ._1 . Pc711 2B TIci -44kc. (13 ,::%1 IF r c^7, • .1 r X i i,c, • i ;...-- 03 5 ,16,.. . 11 lig..,F.NialiT 'A '0 • ' I '..--' ••,j 5 Ac IN 48 off 5 ,Gilii •I' --- g•• 1 - ,;•,. . --:, 11 . 1------- . . f• 50.71 Ac I PC-ipiliP , 4.5 Ac _pv01„,_ COPtik3.. 1 414'1••• k .4- - eli DULL Wi 14 , • •cks i I.- .1.5,4.. .,:•,..,,,..,•...II`..,„. L ot..;..1-:.;i6.,....?.....r."....c.ini,•!,,,4-lici,. . o..!.ir.3.•,r..;,;:air (...._.....<t.,...‘ 4: u.'-' \_..ki, 4; ,ittt 5 "INF I '5. r .iiT3, f' HOIRAPA OH A Erik lifr - • i,--1 0 , Lit -.211: SEAMY A481 4 i l'i- ... Tiveit. ' •i• :--, 59. 7. ! ! !,! I / '-i- F ' i tta',"1 v.....s- i• • u., i I '74, ‘-all% a„...inmmu/xlk'A.v0A;K0ID 1 . . 610A: :e17 59 ....- '......:1".!..7:1" .: .16::"'''.. ' 1. •-,71144.141j1-,!•-• f! • ; :', 1,-.-/. *A. ! • • •-!-- i I ,, 7-771 . 50 5C1 , • - ! ! • . :' i ..- i lig • ..... 1--•;4 0 PARK •4 Ac • /i ....7.- .- 0?: ;mum...a: .i., _, 1- • I _j. . r,IT 71-- \I! i I . / 1 , - • - . - .' -.1:1:0us.111.1:1 ;• ;i ,' ! i 'a .11.45 ,-.I _. I i 4‘r-1-r• .- H kiel .14.4 rmi% 1 1 ..... . . • .1.:1...a. . • • i ..,.. 11. 1.111M1,4 •97. • 'eVi • • • -.- ,...„--,•7:Apusa. K: NM • i 1 1 II / . -1.--0.• •I 10-1J-TI-Vi- 451°1 t+. ' ! j• • •;;%4 .-4"-4. • ...• 1 s^.% / ilii ., ‘ i ‘e..4.e... .._ _i_44 1 ; • '•-- i'l -• •-•"', ..,..• ,......, ,....-•• •---- ,,..'• -i-- 44;4 1 • ilSi -- .. ;-.1 _ • , 1 l'-+ iii -1. • • 9°V1 . . - . taliear,, ..` L6 •,... h.. . a - T- .... '4. - x \ \ JAI./ • I i i :'I_1. 1 i N. likt, '''''''.:,:L. . Ziarit.0,q. .." • 171. •,..L., 1‘. 1 i •.4.,11qa Iiii;'''' . I , [ ' jf . -.,•,....coll PPP'.;- F i '•,-• - -,- . . 1 r . . •-. : I•--•-i,---•-•-.. ! (.....i I ..c..i414‘ ..j • - ,::....- '' '..;•.:4'. 1- 4. i _. Apo- 1 -e&..1 fiu . . . •-. ._. -,...i. ._. -44fi • ‘' / M -\\---- 1 --:".••• :0471.5:•••m...00" \ '7, • . _ . . .. "'" ------• \-••••• !) ! ! Milli ! ! ! - __ - .... - -_ _-_--_____•3=- - • ./ \ " ai I ‘---1__2A I X 3t1... 1.7:7'7. l TTTITTITT:1 1 i ,..:.,.1:I i ! 1.1 ! i. . \ .... ...4. •‘. .....1..../.0-7 ':. . EV i R ..r. .---!' "____„ k • -ri,,t' i 'At. ,,5. TRACT MAP ..-- •--•,..•.e, - i it.. • /-... .. • ..„-.c. . i . 1 ! t •.......)._ . -, -ffim ...- • ,L. In, • - •rt..... • - • „.74 ,. .•••7Nontzio... • i... s'jf ils\ ./ ..,. . . 8D3 ,... . 4- .• ...., „. ., , . " ' " %,'-.‘•- / ' s• • '-.-F.1"--11----Y-1 17...:7„.„._. _. .7-.41( .._ I I i.p. •• ;� \ CK OQD jS i - •,• -1 ay e S r`H�f +"cP 9S AC 0..I.V. ...:. ' ir SF TR SE / .••• ''- .R 5DIB •"� IR 5D25 ID1 r/9' .� TR 3D1 vrjl 1TR 5.116 AC y TR 503 i '' •QS V 1.0 AC c�3'I 1.88 Ac 3'.4 4 R 2.'I 8 Q q6 � i r: • 4 1 ' 4 •• • 5 • • 6 . 7 =� • -, . !i `,/ TR 3D 1 • 2 ILL 11ir #. .� / IB3 1c3. s 217 , $ 99e 1.71 I CA 5 �, '`�• 1 A�R66g8 1 s9 0 •� 1 i lit 7�q w :� z z 2;: '' TR 2A1C 22A w • ir• . foe" s. 9 -r R z fl3 R • , 1 1.0 AC • SAT M • 19 20 " ' iR 3F r , . , . 4.23 AC '�. Zy i (3.23 AC) (1.00 AC) AA :�r I,ES 18 • 00 2 AC • 17 / • b 'pINVZAc�s PINE CT E '61 PINfi ACRES r . .. CT kigrAilA nu • TR 2A j ' t 3: �.:.103 16 10 AC 15 • / \,\t . • •• .- .14� •n�, 13 • 12 •• 11 . 1 9 °J • . r " ®KNI ADD + . 1111110 LILAC LILAC LN p P. 2C3A 9 6 S 7 �66 rat • 77 It h 9S El 'T ' SPIINTREPRESENTATIVE#99 ADJACENT OWNERS LAURA MIKI,OSKO AND ZONING SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#10 AL MORIN ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING • ZA96-156 09-Dec-96 Number Owner Name Zoning 01 GARRETT, S. AG 02 1709 JOINT VENTURE AG 03 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AG 04 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AG 05 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AG 06 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AG 07 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD 08 CARROLL ISD BOARD OFT PUD 09 RICHARDS, J .W. PUD 10 TIMARRON LAND CORP • PUD 11 GARRETT, R. SF-20B 12 MCCOMBS, M. AG 111/13 STEVENS, E. AG 14 KILLION, W. SF-1A 15 FREZZA, K. SF-1A 16 FREZZA, K. SF-1A 17 FREZZA, K. SF-1A 18 GOETZ, P. SF-1A 19 WEST, A. AG 20 SMALL, B. AG 21 SMALL, B. AG 22 SMALL, B. AG 4101 8D-5 City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY .se No: ZA 96-156 Review No: One Date of Review: 12/13/96 Project Name: Revised Preliminary Plat-Timarron Addition,Phase 5, 89.12 Acres in the Obediah W. Knight Survey Abst. #899 • APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Timarron Land Corporation / Carter&Burgess, Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Freeway, Suite 1425 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 Irving, Texas 75062 Dallas, Texas 775247 Phone: (214) 791-3333 - Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (214) 541-0800 Fax: (214) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/25/96 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Place the City case number "Case No. ZA 96-156" in the lower right corner of the plat. 2. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties within 200': A. Provide corresponding deed records (volume and page) for all adjoining unplatted tracts. B. Show as dashed the lot lines, R.O.W. lines and existing easements, and provide lot&block numbers, street names, subdivision name and plat record (volume and page or cabinet and slide) for all existing adjoining platted property (Richard& Debra Garrett property, Spring Creek Acres, Graham-White Addition, etc.) C. Correct the existing zoning for the Richard&Debra Garrett property. 3. Show and label the approved final plats for the CISD property (Rockenbaugh Elementary) and the portion of Phase 5 east of Byron Nelson Parkway. 4. The POB should be tied to a survey corner; subdivision corner or USGS monument. (It appears that this is the case; however, the reference in the preamble should refer to the plat record of the Garrett property.) 5. Provide street R.O.W. dimensions for Street "A" and for Street "E" at its intersection with Byron Nelson Parkway. 6. The Street"I" cul-de-sac length does not meet the minimum 150' as required by ordinance. (P & Z Action 12/19/96: Delete) • 8D-6 City of Southlake,Texas 7. The following changes should made with regard to easements: II/ A. The perimeter 5'UE should be increased to 10'at adjacent platted properties that do not have a minimum 5'UE adjoining this property. B. Verify the adequacy of the width and/or correct the label of the drainage and utility easement between Street"G" and Byron Nelson Parkway through Common Green 55 (for 30" storm drain and 8" sanitary sewer.) 8. Label all front building setback lines, especially.at any breakpoint or discontinuation. 9. The following should be corrected with regard to the approved Phase 5 development regulations: A. No more than 50% of the lots may have front yards less than 25'. Based on this revised preliminary plat, the lots in the approved final plat east of Byron Nelson Parkway and the • remainder of the lots east of Byron Nelson Parkway on the original approved preliminary plat, approximately 60%of the lots have front building setback lines less than 25'. B. Lot sizes must be a minimum of 10,500 square feet in area. Verify minimum lot area for all lots,particularly Lots 25-26, Block 54. 410Z ACTION: December 19, 1996; Approved (6-0-1) subject.to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated December 13, 1996, deleting Item #6 (Street "I" cul-de-sac length). * Although there are.a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial,they appear to meet the intent of this requirement. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 12/23/96. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule.All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation Carter& Burgess,"Inc. 0 • FILES\REV\96\96-156PP.1 8D-7 rams et il 41/ • IP ...,....._______, PP. iro.PAHO ii.MI: 4it -„ 44 . fl.„ ,ii,...sim. sw,.....:. .............................., . ,,,.., rtli° n C ..c • I id7 4T•YT .•• n1 _ ni •ti YT :j`_. 1 i1 ... ._. .� I .. .•. .. ii Odvrt ,1• L..a•S i1060SE! r1 aa,,,85•_ I _. - 1i ,` -serve \ f,}r •�1 :�-! 442.0.5G'S7'aS ..�...� .. •. i. 1{ w/I �, , f 1 VI S.,•2t4R ' i .....w ww s. . _ r'_ _' _ ...o-'�' air Iiri 'p •1., 1•.� 1 a s . a ' S n n 1 .,ice.�,r�1 f Oill Y I If • 'lIy'u-,a i.. R .�IY,�a �y 9 b •' gin 1 a M1.SO[M0W_•�-RJITT�U•1 • I'__:i-_-_ ' Dr Pna.100' .�scfl, jay ,. •• i d' • 1 I. a`° ]i i.e 'Ir2!'• r 07 on,..o>n -••y • iii ...•?' - ::� - f • 00 • A l�za.mt.. /^ rsnm r s" i '•1 ♦ 4 �y iiw .:iw- :RYw .a, mm g ' d i dn"m u driK1.. a:.,...,,e"....;t9„....+r rul.. L-. .�ni:lS:ir" *ft s.wlr a3°c'�'°a s'S MOTTO ••m emr+la Ye a t • , , su mn.munuo.n.va rurm,K....w owmli N0005'00XT• i.,. ,! M21•6YQI�! ' a•a l..••..w•I..•..sc..r•r4 As:M b.n.l••.a•mtlln•.•. 20.00' �A p.� 1 ••__-1 114 . I'1. R�!��1 !Y awx.ut r.nm u nm.�a ls.aes.s RA••..n�+n f cc `A gl...lw n:1 • 's sTlQia '. -ate"'•__11aa Y �••--r•. - • •�0.a z.•.1[.1P9•.K SS=10 M KNVAf.r llVlO6 rein.!. _ 20.m YY • _ Fillip I.n Y.ed •.01 m1 Ass • �; `^^OMIT a.....9 I CIEE ' 1 r}�r} -ll1 .ya°(..ar rt.r t..`. Al f i f • 'R . [f'Y c _ I tart Oa KE.wi t .....MU oCSoural '11 —'--y C6• LOS a00[ 11 f,....__ ,: • ` r.r'�� -- Si 11 RECD NOV 2 51996 • tS II • Iill / nAsOo smiles Y01_ � 'oeor .`: :AIw i 1 • REMO In6ru T RYT '1 • TIATAHAO21 ADOfT1ON f l; I e.L Moron Eta I. i ! `• w 1 e i Oemu.,•.aw01,T SU19EY.ABSTNACT I0.241 _ OTT a sanauc Taa.irt COUNTS.TEXAS !iiI ' -9---'-•` x _ .__ _ (- wsv ,m•'n r 1 4 2La WKS2 SI LOTS )+• - .V.SCLue __ i • 2 MASON Qm15 II.I 11 ^' 1!`I —�Pito caw•. ',�I. - '•' OIMUNEMCLOtG,nAalUl LIOG[dO0a1Tp„ 1Q!t I I 1 `,S • + aw• 1 i i ! 300 E a1R0UToI rSU,AT.SATE M25 i� t i `.. , f - sat4raRS nob , Ir -z, =>> 1 s �1 o�xxu s`:2 MI CS1•,w FAX awi sa•aaoo 3 f1UT 9•a I A � ETss"�o¢u`enoa d•r�suTe xs'�o ee to.ln, fi , •�" �� Oau,.TEtu ntn {{ S ri ' _^ ` N. a - • �,`•,-srf f2N1 a,t-da W-014T 31 �� 1 , ' '^Y• . aw I I II--`• I'; / '. • _ - iiii4 •ara•Ir.no.arm Of n.eM.o 31.wn.w•O,kt.TY..TO m.m nma.w•.a.•S.ROOT wort now..rrnv T.r.owe..man•.m,n.mna In.s met ALA u Tu am• Irmo.I City of South lake,Texas • MEMORANDUM April 13, 1995 TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tom Elgin, Comprehensive Planner II SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 668, Street Name Change Attached is a letter dated December 30, 1996, from Countryside Bible Church requesting that the portion of Ravenaux Drive within Ravenaux Village be changed to Countryside Drive. Staff have reviewed and concur with the request;however,we recommend that the name be Countryside Court in accordance with street naming policy for cul-de-sacs. I have since spoken with Larry Snyder, Chairman of the Deacon Board, and he is comfortable with the"Court"designation. Street name changes are processed upon receipt of a letter of request accompanied by the fee established in the fee schedule. (Please note in their letter that Countryside Bible Church has asked for a waiver of the$100 fee.)Staff then prepares an ordinance for the street name change for Council consideration—a copy of which is attached. Upon Council approval of the second reading of the • ordinance, the Building Secretary will readdress the lots on the street and forward changes to the appropriate departments within the City and other public agencies (U.S. Post Office, Tarrant Appraisal District, etc.) . Please place this street name changerequest on the next City Council agenda as a consider item. If you have any questions prior to the meeting,please don't hesitate to call me at 481-5581, extension 753. TE att: Letter from Countryside Bible Church dated December 30, 1996 Ordinance No. 668 with Graphic Exhibit L:I CTYDOCSIORDWINALI STREE71668_NMCH.WPD 4101 8E-1 i • a , COUNTRYSIDE BIBLE CHURCH , December 30, 1996 Tom Elgin Community Development Planner City of Southlake 667 N.Carroll Ave. Southlake,TX 76092 Subject: Street Name Change Dear Sir, As you are aware,the portion of Ravenaux Drive where our property is located needs to have it's name ;>=i changed for public safety reasons. Currently we are the only property owner on this portion of the street with occupied facilities although the Christian Men's Network is preparing to build their new facility. • We have met with officials from the Christian Men's Network and both organizations formally request that our portion of Ravenaux Drive be renamed to Countryside Drive. We attempted to come up with a list of alternative names,but both groups agreed that Countryside was our first and currently our only choice. A preliminary check has confirmed that Countryside is not currently a street name and should be available. If for some reason this name is not available,please let us know and we will work together again to pick an alternative. We understand that a fee is required to process this request,but we respectfully request that this fee be • waived since both Countryside Bible Church and the Christian Men's Network are non-profit organizations. Thank you"for your consideration of this request Respectfully, ;; /64L 241-1-- <:::, ! Dan McGrew Larry Snyder Chairman,Elder Board Chairman,Deacon Board Countryside Bible Church Countryside Bible Church REC'D DEC• 3 0 1996 Tom Watson,Pastor ■ Byron Yawn,Associate Pastor ■ Rocky Wyatt,Youth Pastor 250 RAVENAUX DRIVE ■ SOUTHLAKI 8E-2 76092 • (817)488-5381 — METRO(817)481-3375 � a SCITY OF SOUTHLAKE ORDINANCE NO. 668 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF A PORTION OF THE STREET LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "RAVENAUX DRIVE" WEST OF SOUTH WHITE CHAPEL BOULEVARD IN THE RAVENAUX VILLAGE ADDITION TO "COUNTRYSIDE COURT" FURTHER DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES. WHEREAS, a change in the name of the street located within the City of Southlake, Texas (the "City"),presently known as "Ravenaux Drive"west of South White Chapel Boulevard in the Ravenaux Village Addition to "Countryside Court" has been requested by the City of Southlake; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to hereby officially change the name of such street as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the name of the portion of street located within the City presently known as "Ravenaux Drive" west of South White Chapel Boulevard in the Ravenaux Village as described in Exhibit "A", is hereby officially changed to "Countryside Court". Section 3. If any section, article,paragraph, sentence, clause,phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the Validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of the ordinance despite such invalidity,which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict. r 8E-3 • PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. O • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • LACTYDOCS\ORDWINAL\STREET\668-ST.WPD l 1 8E-4 1 I. 0 EXHIBIT "A" 68.7 Ac 1 I 35 At �(5R �`- 411' Zr t�pAl� 6rl 11 O: 1 pii.,Di W V v ;; ;}. A ►6601 IrSTq 74- III :>1,��nn I© No r- 1 i - , \ .. ) 1 Go, , / 0 t• r 6D41� i :� l K . r 8f1 a 80 \ 80 8D3 6C L r 3E18 3EIA 3E1� - e 1 I L----- ., 11 , 0 i D D8C2 — rA.sr wcraNu STiREET J ___„. BA8AI16 8A5 SA %ABAImI86L®1 ® .ry 1 I. ! A2 8A8—8 ! 1 88 al 'N iJ� 6 682A�� BBIA CfOQT�rl-irn/ MIMI Subject — — 1"=Approx. 1000' S . 8E-5 City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM January 3, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 97-02, appointment to the Parks and Recreation Board. Resolution No. 97-02 is listed as an agenda item for the January 7, 1997, City Council meeting, giving Council the opportunity to appoint a replacement for Rod Johnson, with a term to expire in May, 1999. Attached are the applications I have on file for appointment to the Parks and Recreation Board. The individuals were interviewed during the process last June. If you have questions, please give me a call. sl • • City of Southiake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 97-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Parks and Recreation Board was created for the purpose of Planning and Developing parks and park sites within the City of Southlake, for the use and benefit of its citizens; and, WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Board shall consist of nine (9) members to serve three (3) year terms; and, WHEREAS, currently a vacancy exists, leaving an unexpired term which will expire in May, 1999; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of.the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City Council hereby appoints , as a member of the Parks and Recreation Board to fill the unexpired term of Rod Johnson, with a term to expire in May, 1999. Section 3. This resolution is effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1997. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary 1 • NM 1 -Apjk City of Southlake 5 -�/ APPLICATION FOR APPOINT I • k J' APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: PIqR K P)C7)r<-6 * (name of board, commission or committee) *Use a separate application for each appointment desired Name: i I so. Pri€YC(CtLurz___ Address: d C' 9 %1 i'Y) LX h-u 4 br? ► Vim, Home Phone: 09 I - R"a$"(.0 Years in City: y/Y10 7 Employer: SE W -C fel i 4- +7 att.) "hen 1-CPS} Phone: 621 V-9$ '7-? ) 3 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: /U'O k • Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the Ose, goals, and duties of same: '-- rm rA new /?e,s;den I- ;r, Sooti-h 1cdC-2- am d cam Ve, 1m)A.v-e._ Ve) \ckr-x— A--e\-N.n-,.L\ c,D is\-Ir\ .`mo-1 (ink\k,ren Gcl,- \\ e.k.s `.\'h cS e_ \v\ irnx.k. CGnt\�re.n s `nc\ r \ caw. �c .)Z (LMmurit\-,1 ckfl ubcn•N--`, Cen \9,4- '!`�C:C.�C.. \ h..1 • i.x\ '„n 1�1r�s�V•� !DOft . ery i fNV\mun%ra..�nc\ u)C\-� pPcap\,P a A ( ch.r - c,,.n a c ?ja .vt\ eCa3.-LA --V 10 Nor land w ?ca . Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: inc Q CA \car) (-o_A-1-ern\..\ Oss lss an 6 \P p Qua\\AcAt-. r i,.A CsA ne_n_e_A\ r\rk.�a ,)r1.Ss Inc\ w x 4 k VJen(c\ • s l c_cr' r\vt1 "9 Seca h\a\c-_ \ 'Oe'n cPAeacco n' '1 ne6ril k 6c- cner c...,nl_ 4C c1uc,1"4.-,X. VC\i• V1\61.1 c5 c\k c.ob►nS `►C t n\ec< T-V '6 Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? frS Additional information or comments: Ple eturn this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard. Each application wil ept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information her If yo 'sh to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature: boAV),cQ,c\cj AL___, Date: 6-/'c— 96 qCAWPFILESTITYSECUPOINIMN.FRM Ms. Sandra LeGrand MAY 1 4 1996 2, City Secretary City of Southlake OFFICE Southlake, Texas May 12, 1996 Dear Ms. LeGrand: I wish to be reappointed to the Southlake Park Board. I feel that I have made a variety of substantial contributions during my two-year term, to include: -- Serving on the City Manager 's Trail Committee. -- Serving on the Park Master Plan Committee. -- Conducting a series of well-received focus groups on the park master plan priorities. -- Serving as park-board liaison on trails and budget. I have a good meetings attendance record,and have tried very hard to offer thoughtful input to all park board issues, attentive to 1110 community needs. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Marge Zielke cc: Kim McAdams Rod Johnson • 1110 MR-91-96 FRI 08 :40 AM _, P.02 • -: . Ilk :' •i• II '4j1 do • skitniald6kELmaNallsJsm3 • com-rvrisiass .. itatei _ . C, Ty 8. Y APPLICATION TOR APPOINT TO: (Name of Board, ,Co, i. .. ., ; Committed) -#. .0, �` .• •, Parks and Recreation Board T ^ use a oparats app oetxon or sac appo rx -n es �.� :: ;•;,glum; Douglas E. Fierce ` _', ':► Q Ttp68 t 2419 Greeabough �. " :;' ' :3 • . ,t ADD '' • g plum s 481-6246 - . MRS Ix'Q TY t 18 months �.. '` •.4.- R Lamm: Commercial Metals Co, Liberty Division 'flOTb t 214 •37-33 6 ..`.: ' Current and/or previous boar�P q a`min$ivAil°eemNItitsb amp ieaa*:. ti in the City of -louthlashe: Reasons for desiring to serve on this beard, eommissi-u, or . committee, and, your opinion as to the purpose, goals, d duties, of same: see attachment r _ Qualifications and®xpe i encs that would assist you in serving in this positions - _ - , - - - - -,.-.4 - ` . Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and aotiva support are required AO an appointeeyalad that nonoomptiaaci' could . result in removal from the board? . - , • .M44,1;1.04%41 halo ►tion er comments? . .- • Plata* return this completed form to the city sec• retary's .Office. Each app1iaation will be kept on file for one (1), year, /Signature=..,,._ , �, Datet o7 • W ,..� If additional space is needed, attach to this app icat:Jon . �` • • • .•• . ., f. . "��TaT r... . ::; • ;• i. qa • FRI 08:4 1 AM P.03 • PURPOSE • My motivation for submitting an application for appointment to the Park Board is three fold. First and foremost, as the father of three pre-school children who will benefit immensely from the park system, I see this appointment as an opportunity to directly effect the course,of the Southlake Park System for my family and all the families of Southlake. Secondly, The Park Board's extensive agenda both active and forthcoming lends Itself to a myriad of ways l can serve this community. Lastly, being a SPIN standing committee member, I see this appointment as a logical extension of my desire to impact our community in a substantive manner. I perceive quality leadership for the Southlake Park and Recreation System as being the Park Board's primary responsibility. Leadership must embody a commitment to the staff, facilities and assets of the Park's system. A commitment to accurately reflect goals and desires of the citizens of the City of Southlake encompassing the current, developmental, and future plans and activities which must include aspects of our cities continued growth. • QUALIFICATIONS • Education B.A Huntington College Th.M. Dallas Theological Seminary Business I am an Operations Manager for Commercial Metals Company Liberty Division. My responsibilities encompass aspects of daily operations, Transportation,Safety,and Environmental issues for our Dallas,Lubbock, and Shreveport locations. I sit on the Commercial Metals Federal Credit Union Board of Directors. Additionally,I have fifteen years experience in commercial and residential construction and development. • • ,�f tii LS v a u a L •- i " - 7 MID ...., r _ City of Southlake 1 OFFICE OF CITY APPLICATION FOR APP T ;.►,Jthka APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: 6q9 * (name of board, commission or committee) *Use a separate application for each appointment desired Name: el�! AUL IL Address: qA �t '' i Et0- . )� Home Phone: 'P I - 0,5 5 Years in City: Alp) g / . Employer: Phone: Curr t and/or previous board .commission, or committee experience in the City of Southl _ ALCtdb/it , GtX7,1>t CULeCia) ciiiiLed AfaiLitit-g.te, i',..pArithiA. -; , k...._,! Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the se, goals, and duties of same: • _ {J- � ''L ,(/ �''�. - ' -� ittir4/14t .X// .Q . 1 ,-,44e. i4 " t (7, 4 . -t,/tx_ 4- 1A,,k_,--/1--itt-(214.4( ,; U 1, 44 j.iis ,F,4trY(60--kivE , -- 1/Li40/L'h4tio CO; L'�,,L ;ALdt . "w 6-4 ' ,C ,`�lfillM// al-et / Qualificati ns and expert ce that would assist you in serving in this position U & ( l. t;LAUQ'7L4inu ,' 5 ' . ( 40/1ksAS/ _i 0294. 1 Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? • Additional information or comments: • ' ( (.-/) i V -; /�//64' o ' ,(41*AtArta W&I - , 1/ _ Y . 6 LL'2it•cd&LX. .--,til L Lirtp,/}ir,17,7 Avt H Yii-el- ap,7 g(lito-e KALigoot&L.) 4Ple return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard. Each application ept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information he if you .sh to continue t r considered for appointment. Signature: 11_ • Date: <J�/ rC:\WPFI(2/0 SICITYSECWPOQdTMN.FRIA , rob • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM January 3, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 97-03, appointment to the Southlake Park Development Corporation, to fill an unexpired term. Resolution No. 97-03, gives the City Council the opportunity to appoint a member to the Southlake Park Development Corporation to fill the unexpired term of Rod Johnson, who has resigned. The term will expire in May, 1997. Because the term will expire in a few months, Council may wish to not make the appointment at this time, but rather wait until May. Attached are the applications I have on file at this time. Of the applications, Ronnie Kendall and Vicki Johnson now serve on the Parks and Recreation Board. If you have questions, please contact me. 1 • City of Southlake,Texas • RESOLUTION NO. 97-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE SOUTHLAKE PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SPDC) TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted by the Development Corporation Act of 1979, Article 5190.6, Texas Revised Civil Statutes as amended (the "Act"), the City Council found it advisable to authorize the creation of a non-profit corporation to be named the Southlake Park Development Corporation, to act on its behalf in financing, under the Act, eligible "projects" deemed to be for the benefit of the public; and, WHEREAS, four (4) of the members shall be members of the City Council and the three (3) remaining directors must not be employees or officers of the City, or members of the City Council, and at least one of the remaining directors must be a member of the Southlake Parks and Recreation Board; and, WHEREAS, currently a vacancy exists on the board of directors for a citizen at large member, to take the place of Rod Johnson who has resigned. The term for the position will expire in May, 1997; now, STHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the above findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. The City Council hereby appoints , to the board of directors of the Southlake Park Development Corporation, with a term to expire in May, 1997. Section 3. This resolution shall become effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1997. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary • ig- 16 I 4► 1 1 ll — — City of Southlake It 2_1 ig96 —i 7 4. 7 APPLICATION FOR APPOIN F AY I) \PPL[CAT[ON FOR APPOINTMENT TO: ou,-r\,\,:1,\&Q Rco- -I, 1�, coev.- @of-pc=,c,- ,,y (name of board, commission or committee) *Use a separate application for each appointment desired Name: -- c\.\ems `\., qt-Ni Address: I3 \3 N . v::)\-\;- 1/4!-. Q cca.r t -- A6A. . Soo:-1- 1\c1kg.. Home Phone: % - a S gL( Years in City: S' Yew►S Employer: C\5. - (7)�Isse y vj `e41 r1Voa Obb r S:(la-Co- Phone: 9 ?- 565 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: }e.Q n JCW.e./e L Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purie goals, and duties of same: p • Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: • Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? ye)J . Additional information or comments: .� w(i (yE;,_,1 Y \( ;„_ ,n•k)f VWN\Q -b2AJN'afiV4ft\I-- Cfjl&C,1/4:.\-: 17.,,V\. . lease return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard. Each application /ill be .? ton file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information erein wi to continue to be considered or appointment. \ rl ignature: ( C�,Sr c '" Date: / -4l 9(o l- 3 C:\WPF LES\CITYSEC\APOINTMN.FRM • Janet Murphy Application For Appointment to: Southlake Park Development Corporation continued Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: Parks and Recreation board 1989-1996; Chairperson 1991-1995, Joint Utilization Committee 1993-1995, Citizens Advocating Parks in Southlake 1993, Southlake Park Development Corporation 1993-1996; founding incorporator 1993. Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: I wish to be involved in the decisions made regarding the expansion of the Southlake parks and recreational facilities. I feel that my seven years of extensive experience with Southlake Parks and Recreation in the various board capacities outlined above and below will bring valuable input to the discussions and decisions of this board. The purpose and duty of this board is to provide the financing for needed park and recreational facilities through the administration of the half cent sales tax income. The goal of this board is to implement the Parks and Open Space Master Plan and provide needed recreational facilities for the expanding population. • Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: My seven years of service to this community have been focused on improving the city's parks and recreation facilities from day one. I have sold outfield fence advertising space in order to raise funds for new playground equipment in 1989 and 1990 when there was no other source of funding. I helped with the development of the Park Dedication Fee section of the Subdivision Ordinance implemented in 1991. I was Chairman of the Park and Recreation Board throughout the research and development of the Park and Open Space Master Plan adopted in January 1992. I successfully argued for the first recreation staff person in 1992. I lobbied for the creation of the Joint Utilization Committee in order for the city and CISD to work cooperatively for the building and use of recreational facilities in 1992. I lobbied for the City Council to call for the referendum vote for the half cent sales tax for economic development in 1993. I chaired the publicity committee and helped to lead the campaign for the passage of this referendum in 1993. I have been involved in the design and planning of the new facilities at Bicentennial Park expansion and the Middle School Gymnasium. I have a good working relationship with City staff and with the various athletic organizations who use or wish to use our public facilities. • mI City of Southlake,Texas APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT 'I'O • SOUTHLAKE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ' c i ISS6 C!T-(SECRETARY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (Name of Board, Commission, o Committee) .sou-fh�cke Pa,-Ks j7erelap.,,e,,I orcir 0,1 use a separate application for each appointment desired NAME: R c c 9;CIC - 1i.►d-Ior') ADDRESS: /31 c/e/�/Go Ci/'G/e • HOME PHONE: 4 3/ - q3 3 J YEARS IN CITY: /S �2 • EMPLOYER: Se/I (27e-hec PHONE: 3l- 9 33) Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: Served ors road 47horo✓qiy(art Ii protemen-rias)r ece` SQf Vt eL on PParKs 4 `•R-crea+ton .4.4 5aler T-ax Ta.IC Force ' Served o k Keep So0'14,14.Ke 8er;u ,Iul der v 1 (pie_ Y.tox en sp'&j S-Itnc%Ay Comni;44ee . Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of 4110same: I arr e-ver,incea' ;, ''ark1 `' Qccrcahio., - 4 Years of Mkmena.1 Warf Cann70441 Club -laloer}.a - 8 us 14"'Morn,) Co arks, C I ob 5,�,%�,,,, fools' 2 )rears - Zed")- Vor,C)%L' ►d Ni 11 t Cavoh Club -flrcllq id 4- ic $a cbettl Coach Qed nball Cogc{, car- riy c4 lelree tytAIcxtqa4. Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: $ e irnmediarfcli abort , Z lore_ S-ou4-hiA.ke and rvorkrvi1 Wif1.1 yoo+h and peopI'e ?ragr,,P J — Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? les Additional information or comments? Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. signature:, Date: 2-7 /994 If additional space is needed, attach to this application • pECItlittl C. • City of Southlake 1.111 MAY 1 41996 r,, APPLICATION FOR AP I '. .F 4 T : ►' ril chIa , j SECRETARY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: pp.,p_rs D . U UD �11 EIVL /"eC6 -- � (name of board, commission or committee) *Use a separate application for each appointment desired Name: I r l P"'Qtl- C LC LK� Address: (0 90 /3 o 1e- N f sotnq t/, 7 6.0 t ,z" Home Phone: S/ 2 y,D2 9 S `V` Years in City: 1/. Employer: G P On l S t trv`-- Phone: 1111 'I g 2-3 o ci Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: ,v i_A_ItL, PaA,L - - 4 44. ) 19-6it— )1,. Ct.-40_ . Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the se, goals, and duties of same: L ki.t,u.P 14101f/u -W D -eQ Q-S ‘44te- 'P a.ti__ Eatt.t_e_O ctix,--4 tt)ou /i/ ILkg I - a Jr/,t, 43-L L t --e -Pte cc it fu v N q L e5 LJ R L I. I g_e tk_e,,,, iit I.4-1L) C/4 L A AWAJNA.3, Quali ications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: T14Jt) m 4--s7�/2 S .a p i s iN p vs ,/� Fs S . ,4.D U4-/UCED 4101Q-Dti tv-C-7 I /1J �'i AV A V C £/' ' ��� / iQ s 1 1 fru Ell i 41- -e _ L' `-e'V : , Do you understand and agree tha your regular attendance and active support are required Zn appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? S .. Additional information or comments: J2 Aw_e IA / 2 £4'u ( 114v nL 4lV N 1 V 6--J c- k o� if /14EV ; .,i/9Av '- o Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard. Each application wil ept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information her you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature: I' ' &o 4 . 24Q _ Date: /2-rig to. SEC\APOINTMN.FRM • ��j - � u L . -rl7 1996 t — — City of Southlake APPLICATION FOR AP ' lek.d 14PaC.j• 16.id APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: Southlake Parks Development Corp. * (name of board, commission or committee) *Use a separate application for each appointment desired Name: Veronica "Ronnie" Kendall Address: P.n. Box 92998 ( I live in Timarron) Sniith1 ake, 76092 Home Phone: 424-3339 Years in City: two Employer: Homemaker Phone: 424-3339 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: I currently serve on the Park Board. T am a Spin Liaison for # 9 . • Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the ose, goals, and duties of same: I would like to be involved in the decision m regarding the timing of capital development of Southlake parks and Recreation from sales tax revenue. Priorities are set by this process . This is where the recommendations from the Park Board and decisions by the City Co n j are set in motion. yua!incations and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: I am a CPA. I worked in public accounting for 6 years . I supervised on audit jobs . One of my clients was the City of Commerce. So, I am familiar -with fund accounting. I had a of of other clie ts, a d know hpw to read financial statements Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? vA Additional information or comments: Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard. Each application will ept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information he you wish to continue to be co idered for appointment. Signature: /�� Date: / 7 7r- q4. - 7 C:\WPFI ES\CrrYSECWPOINTMN.FILM 5-14-1996 5= 17PM FROM CPT I MARKET INC 214 261 1 1 1 1 U1,L a V `� -1 — k 111 n i 1 4 1..).:,,,, r .: � __ City of Southlake By A APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT thlak• APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: WC'1,42.. * (name of board, commission or committee) `Use a se.• ate application for each appointment desired . Name: �� Josuois.tto Address: _ dace T1r4Bca.. • Home Phone: Ait'b—U Years in City: Vi Employer: C . 1RWu 4 ?IA• Phone: Id-oocx, Current and/or previous board,commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: Rixkigatiiiii,i butaiit‘%.-VW/6 L.tiCuianiu.ausei.,- afteutdditi /(4-6044 .fie-- Ix rtu.rIt f ea-pia.. Vai.Caulk-relit. , Am,. Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission,or committee,and your opinion as to the purpose,goals,and duties of same:, xmaiaa,Arta...ksenuk t `, AAtto tT 4 • 1 • it tom.. .:) e. taaaiLL, ..°i.,ii,i. r ns��penien�ce tea would ass y�ffvisng m' .s position: Wrcgmblhatatefults■1,a4, D . • •` • a I• • • • Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? Additional information or comments: Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office, 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard. Each application will be kept on file for one(1)year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish ..to continue to be considered for appointment. Si.. nnL e. ttipirt Date: 5-Pi-% C.•1WPFILES1CrrYSEoAPOINm1N.FRM 9v g' , City of Southlake,Texas S MEMORANDUM January 3, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Depository Services The City's depository contract with Texas National Bank Southlake expired September 30, 1996, By letter agreement, they will honor the provisions of the expired contract through March 1, 1997 or until a new contract is awarded to a successor depository. In October 1996, the City entered into a consulting agreement with Ben Arvizu of Arvizu Financial Group to assist the City in its selection of a depository institution. The bid specifications stipulated an initial three year term, with an option to extend an additional two years. The bids were evaluated based on several criteria: 1.) Ability to perform and provide the required and requested services; 2.) Cost of banking services; 3.) Completeness of the bid; 4.) Funds availability; 5.) Interest rates paid on accounts, deposits and investments; 6.) Earnings credit on account balances; 7.) Financial strength; 8.) Convenience. Bids included "required services", or the types of services that the ',City currently uses, plus "additional services", which are services that the City anticipates using during the term of the contract. On December 13, 1996 the City received bids from nine financial institutions for depository services. Mr. Arvizu has prepared a Depository Bid Analysis dated December 30 which includes a Summary of Bank Services Costs. The cost comparison is for a three year period using pro- forma transaction volumes. Based on the Analysis, Texas National Bank Southlake provided the lowest cost bid for the required and additional services at $15,409 for the three year period. The following is a bid tabulation of required services and additional services as presented in the Depository Bid Analysis: BANK AMOUNT BID Texas National Bank Southlake $15,409 Bank of America $26,640 Central Bank & Trust $31,484 Overton Bank & Trust $35,483 NationsBank $36,502 Texas Commerce Bank $40,373 Liberty Bank Partially provided First National Bank Grapevine Partially provided Landmark Bank Partially provided III It 1 410Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Award of Bid for Depository Services January 3, 1997 Page 2 Liberty Bank, First National Bank Grapevine and Landmark Bank could not provide all of the additional services requested, therefore their total cost could not be calculated. Texas National Bank Southlake provided immediate credit on deposits, the cost benefit of which is calculated by Mr. Arvizu at $3,900 annually. The other banks allowed for varying availability of deposits, up to two days. When the immediate availability of funds offered by Texas National Bank Southlake is taken into account, they are the lowest cost bidder. A part of the bid required the banks to submit the interest rate they would pay on investments. Texas National Bank Southlake proposed using the current TexPool rate plus a minimum of 15 basis points on a 30-day time deposit. When this proposed rate is compared to the next closest rate that was bid, the City would earn an additional $20,666 annually. The City currently has a $3 million 30-day time deposit with Texas National Bank Southlake, and their bid rate is identical to what they are paying now. Other factors which influence the recommendation to remain with Texas National Bank have not been assigned a dollar value and are not listed as part of the bid. They include the cost of changing depository banks and the 4ual record keeping requirements during the transition period. illtaff would recommend that the Council award the Depository Services Contract to Texas National Bank Southlake for the three year period, with the optional two year renewal, for a total cost of$15,409. LAH 111 /aR -2 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DEPOSITORY BID ANALYSIS December 30, 1996 S Submitted by: ARVIZU FINANCIAL GROUP 4020 McEwen, Suite 255 • Dallas, Texas 75244 (972) 233-1699 /a If-3 A Arvizu Financial Group Advanced Cash Management Services 4010 McEwen. Suite 255. Dallas.Texas 75244 (214) 233-1699 December 30, 1996 Ms. Lou Ann Heath, CPA Director of Finance CITY OF SOUTH LAKE 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard Southlake, Texas 75062 Dear Ms. Heath: We have completed our analysis of the bids which the City of Southlake received in •response to the Bid Notice for Banks for a Bank Depository for the three (3) year period of February 1, 1997, through January 31, 2000. The bids were reviewed in detail to reflect the proposed cost of services and benefit to the City for each bidder. BACKGROUND The Bid Notice for Banks for a financial institution to serve as the Bank Depository for the City for the period of February 1, 1997, through January 31, 2000, was sent to the following eighteen (18) financial institutions on November 15, 1996: • Bank of America - Southlake • Bank United of Texas FSB • Central Bank and Trust • First Federal Savings Bank of North Texas • First Interstate Bank of Texas NA • First National Bank - Grapevine • Independent National Bank • Keller State Bank • Landmark Bank - Colleyville • Liberty Bank • NationsBank Northwest Bank • OmniAmerican Federal Credit Union City of Southlake Depository Bid Analysis Page 1 "Flow of funds management, cost of funds control and managing interest rate risk are this decades' survival tools" •. Overton Bank and Trust • Texas Bank - Grapevine • Texas Commerce Bank - Colleyville • Texas National Bank • United Bank & Trust Each of the banks had been contacted to determine the name and title of the individual to whom the Bid Notice for Banks should be sent. In addition, the transmittal letter included an invitation to attend the Bidder's Conference. The bid was advertised on November 18, 1996, and again on November 25, 1996. There were no additional bids obtained as a result of the published notices. The Bid Notice for Banks described the required banking services, the transaction volumes, and provided other information necessary for the financial institutions to respond with a bid as requested. It also described additional services which could be considered during the contract period, if determined to be cost effective. A non-mandatory bidder's conference was held on December 4, 1996, to provide further explanation of the Bid Notice for Banks and to respond to questions for the benefit of the potential bidders. The financial institutions which were represented at the bidder's conference'were: • Bank of America - Southlake • Bank United of Texas FSB • Central Bank and Trust • First National Bank - Grapevine • Liberty Bank • NationsBank • Overton Bank and Trust • Texas Bank- Grapevine • • Texas Commerce Bank - Colleyville • Texas National Bank BID PROPOSALS Of the eighteen (18) financial institutions solicited for bids, nine (9) banks responded with bids. The City received bids from Texas National Bank, the present depository bank; Bank of America - Southlake; Central Bank and Trust; First National Bank - Grapevine; Landmark Bank; Liberty Bank; NationsBank; Overton Bank and Trust; and Texas Commerce Bank - Colleyville. Keller State Bank and OmniAmerican Federal Credit Union notified the City that it would not participate in the bidding. No other response was received by the City from the other banks. • City of Southlake Depository Bid Analysis Page 2 /o T 'f • EVALUATION OF THE BIDS The bids the City received have been analyzed in accordance with the criteria stated in the Bid Notice for Banks which included the ability to perform the required services, agreement to points outlined, interest rates paid on time deposits, cost of banking services, and financial stability. Specifically, in addition to the determination of the cost of services, the bids were each analyzed with respect to the following considerations: 1. Availability of Funds 2. Investment Comparisons 3. Financial Stability & Strength 4. Ability to Provide Services 5. Convenience of Bank Location 6. Certificate of Deposit Rate Comparisons 7. Collateralization 8. Safekeeping 9. Savings Account Historical Interest Rates 10. Other Factors a. . Earnings Credit Rates b. Reserve Requirement • c. Account Analysis d. Overdraft Provisions e. FDIC Insurance Rate COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS The bids were compared in detail in each of the areas listed above. Starting with the cost of services to the City over the term of the contract for the proforma services and transaction volumes, the attached is the recap of this analysis on a point-by-point basis. Where there is no material difference between the bids, the item is indicated. The bid amount, after adjustments to match services bid on by all banks, is presented as "Proposed Cost." This is the minimum level of services required by the City. Additional services are presented as "Other Bank Services." These are services which the City may consider during the contract period. • City of Southlake Depository Bid Analysis Page 3 /6 R-d • SFINDINGS In performing the comparative analysis of the nine submitted bids, there are several important points to note: • Overton Bank & Trust is the only bank that required the City to receive its bank statement detail in images. The City determined this would be acceptable. • All of the banks which submitted bids are capable of providing the minimum level of required services. • Only six of the nine banks (Texas National Bank, Overton Bank & Trust, Central Bank & Trust, Bank of America, Texas Commerce Bank, and NationsBank) are capable of providing all of the required services and the additional services which the City may consider during the contract period, including Controlled Disbursement. • Considering the net effect of immediate credit on deposits from Texas National Bank as an offset to cost reduces the net cost of banking services to $15,409 over the term of the contract. • Texas National Bank emerged as the low bidder after considering the financial benefit of$11,700 from immediate credit on deposits over the term of the contract. • TexasCommerce Bank was the high bidder with a bid of $40,373 over the term of 9 the contract based on the proforma transaction volumes and additional services required, a difference of$24,964 greater than the low bid. • Texas National Bank, the present depository bank, also provides very favorable Certificates of Deposit interest rates to the City. The direct financial gain from additional interest is over $62,000 compared to next lowest bidder (Bank of America) for the contract period. CLARIFICATION The City has a significant opportunity for financial gain through improvements to the cash management system as described and defined in the Preliminary Review of Cash Management System report submitted on December 4, 1996, under separate cover. The difference in cost represented by these bids will only have value to the City if the City takes action to capture these annually recurring financial gains. • City of Southlake Depository Bid Analysis Page 4 /dn-1 .. ',CONCLUSION The City is fortunate to have received bids from nine highly qualified financial institutions capable of providing the required,services. Unless there are other factors which the City would consider, the least cost and most advantageous bid was that of Texas National Bank, which is located conveniently in Southlake. Therefore, we recommend that the City appoint Texas National Bank as the Depository Bank of the City for the new three (3) year contract term with the assumption that the City will take action to make this the most favorable bid and obtain the available financial gains identified. It has been a pleasure working with you on this important project. Sincerely yours, ARVIZU FINANCIAL GROUP in Arvizu BA/jan Attachments S City of Southlake Depository Bid Analysis Page 5 /D At-S. O 0 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ANALYSIS OF DEPOSITORY BIDS SUMMARY OF BANK SERVICES COSTS December 30, 1996 TEXAS BANK OF CENTRAL OVERTON NATIONS TEXAS LIBERTY FIRST LANDMARK NAT'L. AMERICA BANK& BANK& . BANK COMMERCE BANK NAT'L. BANK BANK TRUST TRUST BANK BANK GRAPEVINE COST 3-YR CONTRACT: REQUIRED SERVICES $18,517 $18,225 $23,351 $21,805 $24,441 $27,420 $19,116 $20,877 $22,792 IMMEDIATE CREDIT BENEFIT (11,700) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ADDITIONAL SERVICES 7,092 8,243 7,766 13,378 11,561 12,648 Partially Partially Partially provided provided provided ONE-TIME COST 1,500 172 367 300 500 305 288 --- --- TOTAL $15,409 $26,640 $31,484 $35,483 $36,502 $40,373 Partially Partially Partially provided provided provided 40 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SUPPORTING DETAIL for SUMMARY OF BANK SERVICES COST December 30, 1996 • , CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ANALYSIS OF DEPOSITORY BIDS December 30,1996 (C M G po 4 i)'': . 'y''l-IBER1Yr�ANK r: COLLARK EIMLBLE BANK •COST 3-YEAR CONTRACT PERIOD Cost Current Depository $18,801 Pooled Acct. NIA N/A Proposed Cost $18,517 $19,116 $22,792 Other Bank Services Not Currently Partially provided;cannot Partially Provided;did not.address . Used--Schedule Attached $7,092 provide Controlled Bank Reconciliation and no cost Disbursement on Direct Payroll One-time Cost $1,500 $288 — Settlement Annually Quarterly Quarterly AVAILABILITY of FUNDS Immediate Credit 1st Business Day No Material Difference After Day of Deposit INVESTMENT COMPARISON 30 days-$1 million on 12/4/96 5.61% 5.32% 5.25% 60 days-$2 million on 12/4/96 5.61% 5.34% 5.30% 180 days-$1 million on 12/4/96 5.71% 5.37% 5.40% 7-30 days Certificate of Deposit TexPool+15 BP Not Available 4.25%Market Rate 31-60 days Certificate of Deposit TexPool+15 BP 13 week TB less 75 BP 4.30%Market Rate 61-90 days Certificate of Deposit TexPool+15 BP 13 week TB less 75 BP . 4.70%Market Rate 91-120 days Certificate of Deposit TexPool+25 BP 26 week TB less 50 BP 4.70%Market Rate 121-150 days Certificate of Deposit TexPool+25 BP 26 week TB less 50 BP 4.70%Market Rate 151-180 days Certificate of Deposit TexPool+25 BP 26 week TB less 50 BP 4.95%Market Rate 181-365 days Certificate of Deposit TexPool+35 BP 52 week TB 5.25%Market Rate Minimum Maturity CD 30 Days 31 Days 14 days Maximum Maturity CD 365 Days 5 Years 2 Years Minimum Amount CD $500,000 $100,000 $1,000 Maximum Amount CD '. $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 411113ANK STATEMENTS 7 work days after close 7 work days after close 7 work days after close BANK STRENGTH--ASSETS/TEXAS $46.5 Million $46.3 Million $71.2 Million SERVICE ABILITY Fully Capable Limited Limited Installing new services 5/97 LOCATION CONVENIENCE Southlake North Richland Hills Euless&Colleville New bank in Southlake in 1997 SAFEKEEPING No material difference. No material difference. No material difference. EARNINGS CREDIT 5.61%-Nov.1996 5.12%-Sept. 1996 6-month TB RESERVE REQUIREMENTS 12% 10.50% 10% 10%effective 1997 ACCOUNT ANALYSIS As requested. As requested. As requested. OVERDRAFT PROVISIONS 30 days to rectify @ 1 day to rectify; 3 days to rectify @ 70%of bank's Prime Rate. $20.00 per item. base rate. FDIC INSURANCE RATE .00235 per$1,000; • No charge. No charge. no charge effective 1997. • EXTENSION PERIOD for TRANSITION 90 days 90 days 90 days TO NEW BANK • S , CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ANALYSIS OF DEPOSITORY BIDS December 30, 1996 0 . •'" `.. SOUti EKE ; :,• • NK r"e lE� :s NATIONS BANK COST 3-YEAR CONTRACT PERIOD Cost Current Depository N/A N/A N/A Proposed Cost $18,225 $27,420 $24,441 Other Bank Services Not Currently Used--Schedule Attached $8,243 $12,648 $11,561 One-time Cost $172 $305 $500 Settlement Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly AVAILABILITY of FUNDS No material difference. No material difference. No material difference. INVESTMENT COMPARISON 30 days-$1 million on 12/4/96 Not provided; 5.21% 5.04% 60 days-$2 million on 12/4/96 bank proposed 5.21% 5.09% 180 days-$1 million on 12/4/96 sweep product 5.21% 5.25% 7-30 days Certificate of Deposit 4.25%Market Rate 91 day TB less 15 BP 4.84%Market Rate 31-60 days Certificate of Deposit 4.73%Market Rate 91 day TB less 10 BP 5.05%Market Rate 61-90 days Certificate of Deposit 4.73%Market Rate 91 day TB less 5 BP 5.10%Market Rate 91-120 days Certificate of Deposit 4.85%Market Rate 91 day TB plus 5 BP . 5.15%Market Rate . 121-150 days Certificate of Deposit 4.85%Market Rate 91 day TB plus 10 BP 5.14%Market Rate 151-180 days Certificate of Deposit 4.85%Market Rate 91 day TB plus 25 BP. 5.24%Market Rate 181-365 days Certificate of Deposit 5.05%Market Rate 91 day TB plus 35 BP 5.29%Market Rate Minimum Maturity CD Overnight 14 days 7 days Maximum Maturity CD 5 years 365 days 2 years Minimum Amount CD 310,000 $100,000 $1,000 Maximum Amount CD No maximum. $1,000,000 $25,000,000 •COST 3-YR CONTRACT PERIOD: BANK STATEMENTS 7 work days after close. 7 work days after close. 7 work days after close. BANK STRENGTH--ASSETS/TEXAS $6.8 Billion $21.8 Billion $187.3 Billion (Consolidated) SERVICE ABILITY Fully Capable. Fully Capable. Fully Capable. LOCATION CONVENIENCE Southlake• Colleyville;new bank in Southlake and Grapevine Southlake in 1997. SAFEKEEPING No material difference. No material difference. No material difference. EARNINGS CREDIT 5.19%Jan. 1996 Basis not provided. 91 day TB RESERVE REQUIREMENTS 10% 10% 10% ACCOUNT ANALYSIS As requested. As requested. . . As requested: OVERDRAFT PROVISIONS 6 days to rectify; Zero days to rectify @ Subject to credit approval;$22.50 reference rate+2% Prime per item. FDIC INSURANCE RATE No charge. No charge. No charge. • EXTENSION PERIOD for TRANSITION 90 days 90 days 90 days TO NEW BANK ,s,• i:,,er"ValN,.11!!!! a,t';:0 ma_rk;tiMial,iitn.':.:;'?;e ?'YP;t:11;,11igit:itIlili i{s: , III . /d ft—/Z CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ANALYSIS OF DEPOSITORY BIDS December 30, 1996 III ,:,• r:,; pFIR Ofti$N PEIA 3Irif;` r ;OVar1'd"`I`I � K x: CENTRAL BANK and TRUST COST 3-YEAR CONTRACT PERIOD Cost Current Depository N/A N/A N/A Proposed Cost $20,877 $21,805 $23,351 Other Bank Services Not Currently Partially Provided;cannot Credit Cards not $7,766 Used--Schedule Attached provide Controlled available. Disbursement ,$/3 3" One-time Cost — $300 $367 Settlement Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly AVAILABILITY of FUNDS Local-1 day; Maximum of 2 days. No material difference; non-local-2 days. 4:00 p.m.cutoff for ledger credit. INVESTMENT COMPARISON 4.32% 5.10% 4.94% 30 days-$1 million on 12/4/96 5.23% 5.22% 4.97% 60 days-$2 million on 12/4/96 5.25% 5.31% 5.29% 180 days-$1 million on 12/4/96 7-30 days Certificate of Deposit 26 week TB less 70 BP 26 week TB less 145 BP 4.15%Market Rate 31-60 days Certificate of Deposit 26 week TB less 60 BP 26 week TB less 95 BP . 4.35%Market Rate 61-90 days Certificate of Deposit 26 week TB less 60 BP 26 week TB less 70 BP 4.35%Market Rate 91-120 days Certificate of Deposit 26 week TB less 30 BP 26 week TB less 45 BP 4.65%Market Rate 121-150 days Certificate of Deposit 26 week TB less 30 BP 26 week TB less 45 BP 4.65%Market Rate 151-180 days Certificate of Deposit 26 week TB 26 week TB less 45 BP 4.65%Market Rate 181-365 days Certificate of Deposit 26 week TB plus 10 BP 26 week TB less 20 BP 5.00%Market Rate Minimum Maturity CD 7 days 6 days 14 days Maximum Maturity CD 5 years 4 years 5 years Minimum Amount CD $100,000 $100,000 $80,000 Maximum Amount CD • - $5,000,000 $10,000,000 No maximum. COST 3-YR CONTRACT PERIOD: • BANK STATEMENTS 7 work days after close. 7 workdays after close; 7 workdays after close. detail in images. . BANK STRENGTH--ASSETS/TEXAS $199.6 Million $606.4 Million $926.6 Million SERVICE ABILITY Limited Fully Capable Fully Capable LOCATION CONVENIENCE Grapevine Grapevine Southiake SAFEKEEPING No material difference. No material difference. No material difference. EARNINGS CREDIT 91 day TB 91 day TB 91 day TB RESERVE REQUIREMENTS 10% 10% 10% ACCOUNT ANALYSIS As requested. As requested. As requested. OVERDRAFT PROVISIONS 5 days to rectify 10 days to rectify Zero days ©Prime Rate @ Bank's base+2% Prime+3% FDIC INSURANCE RATE No charge. No charge. No charge. EXTENSION PERIOD for TRANSITION 90 days 90 days 90 days TO NEW BANK • . /0, A-13 • • • . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE--SCHEDULE OF OTHER BANK SERVICES TEXAS LIBERTY LANDMARK FIRST OVERTON CENTRAL BANK OF TEXAS NATIONS NATL. BANK BANK NATL. BANK& BANK& AMERICA COMMERCE BANK BANK BANK TRUST TRUST BANK GRAPEVINE COST 3-YR CONTRACT 3 Locking Night Depository Bags No charge $55.50 No charge $53.58 No charge $52.50 $62.34 $105.00 No charge 1 Safe Deposit Box(10x10x30) No charge No charge $225 $150 No charge $225 $300 No charge No charge 1 Safe Deposit Box(5x3x20) No charge Not avail. $60 $60 No charge $60 $60 No charge No charge 5 Endorsement Stamps No charge $32.50 No charge $74.75 No charge $139.90 $109.75 No charge No charge Partial Bank Reconciliation $180 $2,507 Not No charge $1,800 $1,800 $2,555 $1,800 $2,684 addressed City held Credit Cards: Annual Fee No charge No charge No charge Not Not $25 $25 $50 $45 addressed available Og Interest Rate 14% 12% 14% 16.15% — Prime+6.4% 5%per mo. 17.8% Prime+9.9% Controlled Disbursement Account $1,512 Not avail. $1,980 Not avail. $7,017 $2,340 $2,616 $5,927 $4,496 Direct Deposit of Payroll $5,400 $1,226 No cost $3,622 $4,561 $3,341 $2,712 $4,921 $4,381 One-time Set-up $1,500 $200 Provided Not $300 $175 Not $200 $500 addressed addressed Payment of City Services by Can provide Can provide Can provide Can Provide Not avail. ' ACH avail. Can provide Can provide Can provide Credit Card or Debit Card TOTAL $7,092 Partially Partially Partially $13,378 $7,766 $8,243 $12,648 $11,561 provided provided provided One-time Cost $1,500 $288 — — $300 $367 _ $172 $305 $500 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • January 3, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Developers Agreement with Southlake Woods, Phase 1A, located North of W. Continental Blvd.,West of S. Peytonville Ave.,East of Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938), and South-of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) Background City Council, at their December 3, 1996 Regular City Council Meeting, tabled this item at the developer's request. At the December 17, 1996 meeting,the developer was requested to discuss the road construction issues with Public Works. This meeting took placed on December 31, 1996. Comments Due to the number of uncertainties relative to this roadway section, including ultimate roadway Owidth, Master Thoroughfare Plan,roadway construction materials, availability of rights-of-way, and cost sharing,the developer has requested that a Standard Developers Agreement be processed. The . developer has agreed to contribute$75,000 to the City.to pay for the improvements agreed to earlier; • turn lanes at the subdivision entrance and turn lanes at Davis Boulevard. The City will continue to collect Roadway Impact Fees for this project. The City will use the developer's contribution in conjunction with currently budgeted funds to construct the interim road project for W. Continental Blvd. from Davis Blvd. to S. White Chapel Blvd. The developer has stated that he may want to revisit the Continental Blvd. improvements at a later time;however, in the interest of getting the project•underway; he wishes to pursue this Developers Agreement. Pleas- • ace this item on the Regular City Council Meeting Agenda for January 7, 1997, for City Council' re i w and consideration. ' , 4 is attachments: Developers Agreement Plat Exhibit D:,W P-FILESISUDDIV,SL-W OO DS\DEV-AGR.4M E • I OB-1 • SQUT_ :NNEWO;ODS :P11ASE:1A ADDITION 01\07�97 • DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An Agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas,hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the undersigned Developer,hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," of the Southlake Woods,..Phase IAAddition, to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Addition," for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city ,% services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the 14 residential:JOtS contained within the Southlake:Woods, Phase 1A Addition and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: . • A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. Since the Developer is prepared to develop the Addition as rapidly as possible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residential building activity begin as quickly as possible and.the City is desirous of having the subdivision completed as rapidly as possible, the City agrees to release 10% of the lots after installation of • the water and sewer mains. Framing shall not commence until water.quality.is approved by the City and all appropriate Fire Code requirements are satisfied, and street signs with street names are in place. Temporary all-weather metal signs . securely fastened in the ground are acceptable until permanent street signs are • installed. The Developer recognizes that the remaining building permits or Certificates of Occupancy for residential dwellings will not be issued until the supporting public works infrastructure including permanent street signs with block • numbers and regulatory signs within the Addition have been accepted by the City. This will serve as an incentive to the Developer to see that all remaining items are • completed. C. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, letters of credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the public infrastructure to be constructed by the Developer;and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the • completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. • • 10B-2 • The value of the performance bond, letters of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Each request for reduction or payment of escrow funds must be accompanied by lien release(s) executed by all subcontractors and/or suppliers prior to the release of escrow funds or reduction in value of the account. Performance and payment bond, letters of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s)or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. D. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% of the construction cost for paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2)years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter's of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, • . and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to-perform any required maintenance. If the Developer chooses to construct bar ditches in lieu of curb and gutter, and the City approves the design and grade of bar ditches,Developer understands and agrees to provide maintenance on the bar ditches for a period of two years from the date of acceptance of the.Addition: Maintenance includes trash and debris cleanup,mowing, and erosion control. • . . E. Until the performance and payment bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow required • in Paragraph C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the Addition shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in-said Addition by Developer, save and except as provided above. . F. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, 'title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said • . facilities or any part.thereon It is further understood and agreed that until the City . accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities shall occur at such time that'City, through its City Manager or his duly authorized representative, • provides Developer with a written acknowledgment that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. Acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld. G. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract,Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: • 10B-3 • a. Inspection fees equal to three percent(3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities,on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her•own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent(2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities,on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing(95% Standard); • d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, • holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. • The City agrees to bear the expense of: • • a. •All nuclear densitytests (95%on the roadway subgrade Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection.of buildings to sewer lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and sewer lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. • H. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses,hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass • and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen(15) days written notice, should the Developer.or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Should such cost remain unpaid for 120 days after notice, the City can file a lien on such property so.maintained. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has • 1 OB-4 • been previously approved by the City as"acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. J. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety-company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas,provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall-not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II. FACILITIES: . " A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further;the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with • . Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs,materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City • ' requirements,the City will reimburse the Developer foil-foil-the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water • • service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though . sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. . B. DR ATNAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers,released by the City Engineer,and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to. fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. The Developer hereby agrees to comply with all provisions of the Texas Water Code. C. LAW COMPLIANCE: • Developer hereby agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws that are . applicable to development of this Addition. S . 1 OB-5 • D. STREETS: 1. The street construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217. Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a)Installation and,two year operation cost of street lights,which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition;b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision,said signs to be of a type,size,color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by the Director of Public Works.It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features,however,should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 3: All street improvements will be subject to inspection and.approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying • with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be • . . . installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed • prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they • are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. • It is understood that in every construction project'a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction.has commenced. The Developer hereby agrees to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. E. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install_sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will • be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, • 10B-6 • regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. F. RROSTON CONTROL: During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When, in the opinion of the Director of Public Works, there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer,the Developer will have seventy-two (72)hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the•street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the Developer's • expense. All expenses must be paid to the City prior to acceptance of the Addition. G. AMENITIES: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may • incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, • aesthetic lakes,unique landscaping,walls,and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as walls, vegetation, signage,landscaping, street furniture,pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. H. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: • It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way,.such as landscaping,irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer and his successors and assigns understand that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any • circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability.of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. • _ lOB 7 I. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the streets, and the water, sewer, or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of *construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. • 4. Developer's Agreement executed. . 5. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance,naming the City as co-insured,prior to commencement of • any work. 6. A pre-construction meeting between Developer and City is required. Developer or contractor shall furnish to the City a list of all subcontractors and suppliers, which will be providing greater than a $1,000 value to the Addition. • III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify,hold harmless and.defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, • suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the • improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, • agents, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever,brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or • employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities. ' B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. • 10B-8 • C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not • constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility•and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants,or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and • • specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof,to pay.all expenses and satisfy all judgement which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection herewith. D. . This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not • be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own • construction.contract,the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects • to bid on public streets.and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. . F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2)years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense;provided, however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have . started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. G. The City is an exempt organization under Section 151,309, Tax Code, and the facilities constructed under this Agreement will be dedicated to public use and • 1 OB-9 accepted by the City upon acknowledgment by the City of completion under • Paragraph I.F. 1. The purchase of tangible personal property, other than machinery or equipment and its accessories, repair, and replacement parts, for use in the performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151, Tax code, if the tangible property is: _ a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement; and b. _. completely consumed at the job site. • 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. IV. OTHERISSUES: A. PARK FEES: • The agrees Developer to paypark fees in confo p rmance with Ordinance No. 483 . (Subdivision Ord.),Article VII,Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements. The Addition consists of 14 res_idential'-lots for a total required park fee of$7 00.0($500 per lot/acre). B. . TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: • All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree preservation . . Ordinance 585. C: OFF=SITE:STREET;CONSTRUCTION,'(W:CQNT.INENTAL•BL;VD) W. Contineiifa.l"Blvd1::Rec ui1slhautioni:Issues. • • . s. that. the:Developei: will rec.uiis tiuut;:.'wiu I street-m1pro veiiients • 10B-10 • S a- Phase I Davis-Blvd to Deer Hollow fluve(eutiance to Southlãke \kr.66d0 prcxidi.ttbtac4tanosioindiiietlhe_eas,_ tAid priculTija.*:70;ito-D- avis,Blvd, 2) Pi0Vide.thisinCidding aleftFrturdijanc:Atja Hollow Dri pipirwi*ii _..tthe4,a ,,Han4,76v6tiattlio:asphalt :thd :(2) above b- Phase , „ -I) PrOV*tltee:-lane-,Streett(tvvOttavel-iadus and Out:leftiturnlane), iiieetuig all the City ieguiieinents 111 compliance with • the,,Od-Sfing'-ThortinglifarOtAir„ T-fre-c-*4•11'. . , . .. , . . W4j.4..p;th6;Ocillccti6.4:..o.r;:applic4b16.$trett 657) The current value of this waiver is $1,47;200,"f:128::lys • M,697.,;',C4ii#41-. hi061,1-6a::,$1-$8,94 ;:,roi: • reconsthicting W Contuiental Blvd to the"interim"standard %:.cif4i0;$55 ;57...O:lotat litidg0for W.contj.oeiital Blvd • • : -• gia.00,8.1Vd). Timejefume, time • City will reimbuise the Develop e up to this arnuntit ipoii the . wmplet Jp.p.u, ,c,t.)41S tiutioir .y.f.comti.‘dut....;..!&;Vt7.„.:cy.0140#41, Blvd The estimated value of this waivei is 5% x 465,000 , P.4401.053; .P. Th6;ititent of the Developer and the:CitS,:ip:IO±ecOnStruct a portion of W Onitiriental Blvd to provide for bettertraffi,e1:108V,, to Thoroughfare Plan typb,zo'fooilsliwtioriiiTigpri41; availability of riglIts-Of-way,iand cost sharing,the City has planned attikiteriin road improvements on Continental for the.9.6,91 Budget Year.' The Developer has proposed to contribute to the.City the -amount of'$75,000-:to cover the,Cost.Of additional--improvements and to'allow the 10B-11 city:to coristrucf`these ni rovernents in:con unctio ith the West Continental:,Blvd Project. These;,:i reprove rents:.include,providing for a turns lane:into.:Southiake,Woods,:and construct athirdlaneatDavis;Boulevard. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. -• DEVELOPER: By: • Title: Address Date: • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy,Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: • 10B-12 y ' REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT • 1. The Letter of Credit(L of C)must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding$10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%)percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. • 8. The customer pays anyand all fees associated with obtainingL of C. pY 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. D:\W P•FILES\SUDDIV\SL•W OODS\DEV-AOR.W PO • 10B-13 - t ariar91im.^_]C 1•S_tu1•.�i'•�hZ�iLC.ICI�1.•fir_nMCCAW Nt lnO111, •1r- .11M1:•.N�0..•N.�i:.:YM.I1 I:111.1..••i1:.,Ws 11�..LIMPS.1,AG.. ( • ww�+l�I:11�:i:.Wrili Icla tw.•IIYIY:Y•��IElm.�'Irm.:.:Y1=1::11.1r1. III t IL www1/.��r-11:Y1N�lYlYlYlwfl.:Ylaww:ll.Y:1111��IrE .�Is:11:Y�::IGY1Y11 �wUt�tirwlN�y;w:Yt..ttl.lw.N.:IL'.W,11..a.sltw,li...w.Vr.IjlllwaEB::11 sa NMI.a.i...awtl.N..;b YoYa�t.r.:Y.•.U•CY4Y1Nr rrK1.=.1a�1, nt�::11Y•Y. DINER CERTIFICATION 1>•�t.wa..Rl...,..wr,.....-.:I..-!ILLY:YINaMa1,1131N Il�w1:E121.211\;YIY. J�� 1.t�6I ItW t�Y�/.wM.:;w;YI.-iL1Y:Y.�a.1111.Y.IN Ily1Y:YlNwaw(I.,Iw N.Mllaaa�{:t{:YN.::\:Yilf>r �IS'r_\Y �IT.4 11wWr : 11•1•Mlf2MONfl/C111••=1111L:12INMMIM.l wl.4 rsll\IY;Y•N.a..11.1.tmmo1•tmmot•.:Lt•C1110Y1 a -.1t�r:w:.�.IL:Y,Y.�:w1.�.:11Y:Y1�.:w:1.r�It�G11:Y1•••DVYdr IIIIImonla:11:lalmr.:ICIST PUP 1r1,a....1t1 7W Yn. �,K.. 1 na wM.1.1^y(Nw.A,IN u1N�1y1�1M,ra/i[111 NII N'1N/1�N Nw� .ry IN 1.I./,,,wy 1 1 a.110LT� �IIIa�I11f:YN._:L:YIY. Nta.�.)I1 M�I'it\/1�W,�MVYJI ly w•Ilwlli�l/'1/N.w11,1�.RNl.11li.af�\•1.11.iRw}Lwnllr 1•••�•1 IN AN RI.r.,:.•LNa[.; ..11. R'IwM.1•N'IM M/y,t I�,Iw.Ir1a flwt•.1•w�11ry II fw11..A1a1 fr INW h.rl..1•N.{ 11./1.tN// .10••N.wIwSL1M 111Y:Y _ 1 ,N:.,..w•.al a 1.Nr tS 1.. K1'IN.M NN I•m/11111W,Mr.M In NIr1 r!1\I./.111]11 IN bN.It:=:w1Y/..ar.: wl 1 IweMl II.IN..; NTN.C[ w1,7.• !..mint m.t,im..C1Yl Y:Y. 1' //I' M. .01• I!S' M .11.IN wN 1IN II IN NI A.1)11 I11y V.16 1•.M N••41;' INI- N.I.KI 11 p1/1( 1 1 IM - V [pp[. M•'1..' a.a.RIN�aR11,1.Nc:l-v-Yt.1 �w 1O IN noel .1..M'•� n. .. V \W t•N+\NM 1%woe; 1�Ine Y II MI W. w•w ••a N�R.�ac 1I:1.�::liuiY>• jr.,� � i.N.t Maltlw{.lei#1..N1.u�w..}�N 1 Iwi./r.l1..N NlWlw N IN Ilu 1.w.raN M INI A NIN �Y SCALP r•100• R1 at IN I at wl.a.a Irr / I,I.... Mir 1 N N • • N.w•a�, 11[�•U��1'l tfai IN41�IGIr.'I'all: •W1RA Ia.1'Iw,Nll AIM e,r./..t�W.I.I..N 1..1\: a --� "•I> rN N,'!i•N•).6..IN1.N 3if:L'1Nt..21.�i I.0 M UI I..:.a W \. (� • R1a�rt a� -. •• �Ta1 IN 1"...lu",t�Mi7 wt•i�411n•i•'::,'e1.110 fall��INliiillTIS;i•7y11 I a"M""•Ii11:.w11)Nai.�'INiwlw a1111w•IWNI l�.a Ia F. I °`si "' i e..o si'>l�:y`I�N,ItM,s.ircr!:•'.la a/,t111•w'.•fwl •�IR.• i�.N W a anra Nr1^.M Il./.nl.al Iwrl. I.l .ra w w.w -�-+. �., yy�N IN I A.N.i+'N. all/I t 1t.Y 1.I u•1n'Ie.I M Nt UP a..w.r. 1 N I ---_ F Imo.w R I I R ��� WI11.W.II IN\.a a1.IW1•1 11J IN{l'M.I..l IP MI N rW.11 1/lSwF M Iw rr1 I1N _--fll •mow w R IN1111Yr BIM 1 rs. l 1•1i• 111,,,▪I..a i.If,1 foe ens �....me Waji,I...as, .MNy 1•tN 1111 I/wN - w./t I Nam• • OS w hl.•.1Y•N r �N/KW.aI lw O/•I.,b �� • `CAI[IW mia7. i w�..aN1:i{li.•aiww:ains wnwaiA i ie{+i•1.ni1 .bi.ililc«il..•:Ill.:l«• ••1 lawn U.S N 1 v.r Q I 1 I 011.41 W. f Ott= El . r^ . 2: {;M•) 11,4.I,11 :{ lw1..1.WI.n'11'L'w ,.NNw11 al II..N 1.I I I LtJ N� 'Z l.�l•. R VKR/uf,M'O.ALL Ma R MK/wf[•f t 1 \\ � 11 OM•1 R IN{r fR1 YO.. PC. NII..a.IM Ie1,rw IN..W.iyn, 1�.M�� IIN Nn4 wN name NNE`N..Y{ • __ L.�� •.ra Fri t ---.-. Ril•O w t.,r N.Nl.IM1.T.r...▪ awwll•f.•N I.It IN ..r 11 IA. -'•a •C� at w aw.ti•� nu.1.01„TK, I.Z rMIwR •. • le wR e: 1 wIN. .. •a.a =` 1 S u qr[1,+�, Ml.t n.••a rn 11 . x [i �•• + .0 .ill.yn.. , , .w.. /N N.wt1/...MN.11. IMO w•,an.tl.NNW. .aar V tat 2 K w a a • ,n„Ir• R r ~on�Q� .. iN'lr:' 1w.N.."•N.:.N..c.11..ua1 nw:wlN'Ni.a wN l INu.�..c W wl,...u..1 r.N w�wNw i. /. .Nw.auNr a..I...NN bawl N 11.1 La IK,. 1T r1 1. Z CDYW.A.CA 1 M.w ' ^ w M.M Sloe.u,.•'w.••a.•a Nal al.IIIt.III.�.M al Itr. I%Il TO CC 14MTA.00 e1 R.O.A. = ...' .2 , .�1,,,-,f A.1W MILL IA M Iw'IM Mai II...K Nw.. 1 ry Y ~3a gaRACK m et R nom laic . w1..1.1 la.uN •" I t •f, M.w.N.w SURVEYOR'S CERTSfICAtIOw .ra .1 n �., lIII/1.Ia.M 111 INI Ir 1.w Ills 1.••I.I w..MInSIWI�-y.a'.a}N N IN 1UIa 1'1.w.w Ma•N{N{w h co LOTw0O1 1 • ... r w w.....�1" y�.�1lel�,lw,f„ti M NU,a{ 1�►.,.� tN1 11 Ia1 r,.N. I,.I.I1 Il 1 II II M.1 MII ^ ...w.a..! N IN I.•.'/••..IN{We Il.t ew..l..M'..NIi IN{hrNr woe N N.•....a1 IhNIIw •+ 10 OC IWM�pA4 KOA .wN w R M h w.INulr ,�,a I •� a YNS Mt.,,_�sag al sm. U .1..al. O- ._!z In .p i:ti Aw COMCM. .. �rf . - • ia()•APR'ran Vial••{y SS17 N111 . POINT 0!� W LI•a•. 1N.R' Ili I w 5 all=l lve..Suaa.l�a.11NGR.rx y; .+•• ea1NNINO/ 9/ �w.1�(iL'� CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD w --_--r '-%.1_._,I N- (.A�„mn.LOX.) Iwlw,.. RECD NOV 111996 • a �•y� t wRip.N•{007 I {��. It/MIPIL A nano aawlmN X 1•"IAI T 751 7.J,a, I 1►Mlbt V T. 1 To O.I M. AZ \\ 1 = cam I fA9.,.r F �\ •J- ao...._. 1 O �• .1.7.IG�T.D►SLII� lAlO�� • U. "TM a.nw.rlrw.rws.lr NNW wr.l.wwrw.ww FINAL PLAT ..N.-N-,wa..•••• ••..4V MI Ili SOi1THLAKE WOODS w..r No w sawn.•.w 1..r.N.....••a N al..a I ISOM r N.w.•w1N a...,�^•a• w..rr ••.a•t as w MAO NNW...NIN...w1'�'i N, 11. CI .a w.•...•o•w I..a w..N.•N Me mama w m•••/ • S�IILS[OLNTIAL LOTS fIF7.-.-'-.ML"Ormlla. of NM t.CM•wwlu.wlrn, 0 COMMON ARM e 11 i N.+I INT.Ir ll�x rww+.al PO 11.7710 ACRLt OUT Of THE • YISIRILIT'I TRIANf,LE 002 •1 SIWW.m.1111 r.r lwNw MP.,w....ur w�a wawa. CITY OF OUTHIAKC.TARRANTT MIST. OUNTY TLU3 •.61, LI Its w..Nn+rN 1 .N w.N...'P.M OWL [ .•r.r w. rums.*•aswew atw.I [ taw.•.rta[6 Ia.N•tr..0•..w. SRL Ma.•R ( awe AN.om1 NM..•tT.Na rr m0 11•r• NOTE:NO ORIYETTAT ACCESS SHALL BE ALLOWED FROM ANT RESIDENTIAL LOT MMIN THIS ip lama.Tv.1 MR Ym.R,tlw 111w SUBOINSION ON TO S011RO.AKE BLVD.(TM. 1709),OAKS BLVD. (f,M, 1936),CONTINENTW. 'c IW N.....1.'fr' Ic W.'a"a N^"... BLVD. OR P'EITOtMLLE AVE. _� anl.w 11•..1..A w.. 11~lama•.woe Noe I L• 01 .....r ra 1.. 1....... N..l•.IN a•N I.I P. �`' City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM January 3, 1997 TO: Curtis E.Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tom Elgin, Comprehensive Planner II SUBJECT: 1997 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Application Storm Water Drainage Improvements for Sutton Place Staffs project recommendation for the 1997 CDBG grant program is construction of drainage facilities and associated improvements for Sutton Place Addition(Sutton Lane.)The project entails construction of offsite storm drains and channel excavation, construction of inlets, manhole and storm water collection lines within Sutton Lane, and hydro-mulching the disturbed soil areas. As you can see on the attached memorandum dated June 2, 1995,this project was not listed in the CDBG"Timing of Improvements" as approved by City Council on June 6, 1995. Also attached is an estimate for the storm drainage facilities prepared by Cheatham&Associates. At the time of the "Improvements" memorandum, the drainage was included in the roadway construction project. However,topographical surveys performed for the 1996 CDBG sanitary sewer project for the Sutton • Place Addition revealed localized drainage conditions that were not known until this year. An updated"Timing of Improvements"including this revision will be handed out at the City Council meeting. Please place this as a discussion item on the next City Council agenda. We are advertising the required public hearing for your next meeting on January 21, at which time we will request formal action on this item. If you have any questions or would like additional information,please don't hesitate to contact me. T )17-4' . att: Memorandum dated June 2, 1995 Detailed Cost Estimate LAWP-FILESIPROJECTSICDBG97ICC DISC.WPD • • LI A- - 1 ,, City of Southlake,Texas S MEMORANDUM June 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director , SUBJECT: Authorizing the Mayor to execute professional services contracts with Cheatham and Associates for the preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits for Community Development Block Grant projects in Oak Hill Mobile Estates Addition and Sutton Place As you may recall during previous CDBG discussions,we have recently received confirmation that Sutton Place and Oak Hill Mobile Estates have been approved as qualified target areas under the CDBG grant program. We are bringing this item forward for Council direction at this time due to the need to acquire needed R.O.W. or easements prior to submittal of the 1996 CDBG application, typically in January. We need to proceed with the required research and exhibit preparation as early as possible so that we will have an eligible CDBG project this upcoming year. Following you will , find an approximate schedule for proceeding with the necessary research and R.O.W. acquisition prior to submitting the 1996 application. STIMING OF IMPR VE O " MENTS: The construction of water, sewer, streets and drainage improvements for both additions will be a multi-year implementation due to the limitations in annual funding provided by the program. The engineering staff feels that it is likely that the S2A sewer line will be in place and in service prior to the N-1 (McMahan) sewer line and this would make it more feasible to construct improvements in Sutton Place first. Our estimation of phasing at this point, pending level of interest by target area owners,would be as follows: CDBG CDBG CITY YEAR PROJECT PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION NA R.O.W./Easement Preparation- Sutton Place(FY 1995-96) 0 12,440 NA R.O.W./Easement Preparation- Oak Lane(FY 1995-96) 0 21,835 1996 Sutton Place- Sanitary Sewer 131,745 0 1997 Sutton Place-Water Improvements 86,720 0 1998 Sutton Place- Streets and Drainage 140,000 82,307 1999 Oak Lane- Sanitary Sewer(possibly 2 year project) 130,000 103,330 2000 Oak Lane-Water Improvements 112,225 0 2001 Oak Lane- Streets and Drainage 145,000 75,797 BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: These projects, although funded mostly by the County, will still require expenditures on the part of the City. In effect,we would be leveraging a small amount to gain a greater benefit. As shown in the previous chart, R.O.W. and easement preparation would • ii f City of Southlake,Texas • come from FY 1995-96 funds. This would be funded by the Utility Fund. The chart also shows that f= there may be City participation required above and beyond the CDBG allocation to do a certain portion of the project. Some additional phasing or staged construction might be pursued which would lower or reduce the City participation amount. Any costs of acquiring the needed easements would also be a cost to the City, outside the CDBG funding. Public works staff will incorporate these costs into future budgets for your consideration. Please keep in mind that all of these stages and costs for the program improvements are rough estimates at this time. We will be back before Council to receive direction many times regarding these projects as well as discussing the costs during the budget review sessions. PROCESSING: Staff will need to coordinate some neighborhood meetings as soon as possible to discuss the CDBG opportunities for improvements with the citizens in the targeted areas. We intend to describe the program and the timing of the improvements. OTHER ISSUES: There are some ancillary issues which we are aware of but have not resolved at this time. The City of Keller is currently providing water service to the residents in Sutton Place. There may need to be some type of buy-out for Keller to transfer these accounts. Oak Lane is being served by a private water system(CCN Number 11566)owned by a Mr.McKee. We are unsure at this time what his position will be with regard to the proposed CDBG improvements. We will forward you information pertaining to these issues as we resolve them. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Ill GL/ls enc: Professional service contract for Oak Lane Professional service contract for Sutton Place Engineer's Estimates for Sutton Place Engineer's Estimates for Oak Lane cc: Bob Whitehead Lou Ann Heath Ron Harper Eddie Cheatham Tom Elgin L:\W P-FILESTROJECTS\CDBG96\CC-1.REV ill II ►t - 3 P.02 r96 04:54P / • 1. a o DETAILED COST ESTIMATE / "►V • \ r O NI' City Name: City of Southl ake - Date: 1/31/97 Project Description: Storm Drainage Facilitiesfor the Sutton Place Addition Item Description Quantity Unit Amount No. Price 1. Pre-Cast 8'x3' Conc. Box Culv. 1 EA L.S. $17,000.00 2. Channel Excavation 620 C.Y. $5.00 $ 3,100.00 3. 54" Class III R.C.P. Storm Drains 267 L.F. $120.00 $32,040.00 . 4. 48" Class III R.C.P. Storm Drains 260 L.F. $100.00 $26,000.00 5. 42" Class III R.C.P. Storm Drains 16 L.F. $90.00 $ 1,440.00 6. 36" Class III R.C.P. Storm Drains 30 L.F. $75.00 $ 2,250.00 7. 6'x6' "Y" Inlet 1 EA. : 2,500.00$ 2,500.00 8. 5' Square S.D. Manhole 4 EA. 52,000.00$ 8,000.00 9. 3'x5' Grate Inlet 2 EA. 0.,600.00$ 3,200.00 10. 6" Thick Conc. Aprons/Rip-Rap 640 S.F. $3.70 $ 2,368.00 11. Conc. Toe Walls/Mtl. Guard Rails L.S. L.S. $ 2,670.00 12. Hydromulching ,L.S. L.S. $ 2,600.00 13. Trench Safety Plan e573 L.F. $2.50 $ 1,432.50 1' Funding Match (If Applicable): Sub-Total: $104,600.00 City Amount: * Design/Engineering:_ $ 10,400.00 Other Sources: $115,00Q,00 ** Total Project Cost: S 115.000,00 Prepared By: Cheatham & Asso -ia s, Edwin A. Appl _ P E- * As Required ** CDBG Grant Funds Pagel of l dstT�A`�� BAN zaHEo aG - za[Ii L UA -Ww f aESDE E T RESDENTIAL:::. -1 S, I : N R/I ".ow Sn D t Sll it= wNrTE �gqA�NI�D�'T�-IA •��} T �. LA!'0. - —Y.- N89.35'24•W 60.03' :>• of Q a SPRING CREEK ACRES ZONED SFAA L.U.D. - LOW DENSITY (PLAT E TOVACATED) j F �y#2 Si35� II 1 II 11 Aw ffZIP gIIn2? i ICl lAkA�Kr' t 2 PD/.Gt L I .0.6. Lo AIQ MNE . •s= � -i T SIDErIAL 3. AI Rt- oENSIrr �N39' JJJkkk�Ill A-- L C.=5t0'OT34 •58� 3' "--' 1 �4805 [� yA27.�5cOS 589'44' I L.C.=S68'2719 E j 1 154.2E ,r' {j r 196.96, STEYE GARRETT L�l� o !# ( �197.9• S4T'28'2I'E f ZONED SF-20B_f �- N• ! n 24.4. 1.1L0. - LOW - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL- 333X J] N S89.35.5.1 45597 1 T0 1 1 a 3 Q, 1 W w 1 93 * 26 STREET C f 1 S R=1045.00' X L=183.23' ¢ r >� 1 L.C..S3T'47'25'w �I pp + 182.99' 14 t 1 \� TD J 4 STREET F k 1 I IS _?�- �\ W� r I I - Oo i ] L-Oy �atllaLa-'dam 3 t - e (/ i , R ♦ R•t 30.000 SFI 1 3 f a L.C.=522 08'21'w L f STREET E 418.24' _-'-- ♦•ARPROVE6 FRRgqLLRKNT• ART PLA ►' m ! — > TiWRRON ACD(jION -PHASE 5 t, wA t V 4 I T 4 S 4 3I.UD. .: MEDEAI T,ql DENSIT R�SOENtuL I o eioal st c \ \ Ir POINT OF" NG GA -_ B. OMB EBRA RD p CARRETT 11,E VOL. 7, PG. DEBRA A. GARRETT 616 1 ! EUGENE06 STEV.M 32 ONE! AG 1 VOL ZONED.PG W6 1,� •�� _____,.___ VOLL ZONED z3ze / ' L ZONED s<-u ZONED AG 1 .-/J 'DENSITY RESDq IAL L.U.D.- LOW la L.U.D. - It DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DENSITY RfSIK O.W. KNIGHT NO, a"A ION 1 i 1 T• i i l t Q WT CAB- A. SLIDE 900 I I ? ZONED 5F-IA ! I L1LA - LOW C.C. Jo • - ._._4_ J I T 5' •Loc11 i xi C7IBaG-AlPHM2 ? 1 OVED IA11Ai PLAT r9 1 1 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 6 Rltt Ar• A•Mt QE�tA Ri • tA0 A• Mwpf�NMwr.• fMMM ti 11.• °RUM•r >Vw) C.-MN4. �.l MI 6� CewVMhlw MC�+tiMMNwaM GOty N Rd•.N N • Me M 1..A wN •MI N M'w iYfn IV+.wi tl % Mr MM-N �•� W eW'.f .w✓•NMeM JMw �•0.rsr Y. MTL'1 r N'�•• a'+fl•• N I.e�r M Or.• 1CsrNs.� MRIr.rM M'fSPMr,• w+wp M %At1 f..r, r.biV.tiM tYw>'Mr.• Mr•.e N NG•r _% rOp.e�M )rJ•a Mr.. Mies N KY 1wr. .fKLIrM ]]'.JI •wf,• •.•Nn.• N .U1 N•rr MR.►M %'er.J.�.,• I.rl.e• N)AOA fws .•Q.e�rR N'l6']. M♦• Nfws N t4m f..rr MQ.SM OP.t.T •W, • Mom• N NOiO Ivry T.•..R.f..rM R')M1`[wr,• P.Nns N )ILA• .•.A RAM.�M AYXRtwf.• 6erls N T)A% MA T.OKf.1..,.. AY]P)f taN.• •►f.e. N .)LN f••.. iq[[.tiw Y'Y']I Mr.• rrww N 4•f.•.r T.ONL)w.M W-tM.. Isle• N AAA. f.N. 1••rfL.vM %'NPEW,• I•IR..• N an 1 l T•[.p. w•1 • Vw N r,e Mr M•e • •'./.e N )ll•. 1wr.• O•f• wI. N %']r]J.• ere wr.• N T•vr. 10'.rX4•r.• I•fse• N Tlam Ir,,w I• I.rww N JMJ 1wr1 T•An=t. i..rM A►Tlar�r.• M.� N N1.% fM +.o.a...v N • .... N +re ryA.f I.r.•e • .erA. N mm wN. • •rf• w.. IXOT. e•M O.Ie r1.rM Y'7l.►.••r,• Mrw> N .L% f.•f•w f.• f4Nro• N ]OA1 f.•N M..L-- RTftf •.•I.• INIe'• N NA f•..T 1.•=L M.,H. PM'.Mf.. I•r•.s N T•Yfw.r 1.A�. aLr • NN N Me IrM r,•.•e . I.I,N N 0600 iwf.• •.f.• wMN N N'.T...• re w!. N T.•M ]TTrT TeN.• INse• N 4%f•N.w n Mfww N ASD f••N 14.31. r.e w11r ww N M• .1f rr.y • r•Rs N NIA f W • •w• Ar.P• M f.'f. �• r"'ee a O R�""K eu�es++f%•.• fltl m •�MM e� �t..�Ns N qGY NN LEGEND CIIF CAPPED RON ROO FOUND CRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET STREET CHANCE LIE UTILITY EASEMENT DE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BL BMDNG LINE DSUE DRAINAGE A UTILITY EASEMENT —mmm COMMON AREA DESIGNATION C.G. LOT BLOCK 54 s4 u 55 55 1 53 �.N-sa©m�a©0000 c�a��mas�0or�o �ar'�O.R�r �m.1©�0000 ■�A.a©mma�©aoo �mm a©©omo �� KAmirRi 0�®Q 000',. ��As®C=oa00000 C=c=�a©©oo© ®®©0000000 I����o■©0000 �i��©o00000�i� '®�©oo■voaoo c�a■�caoa®o�eaoo NOTES. LTAAA2=4ASE S COIIRISES ♦ TOTAL Or 01 MSXETTIAL tots AS -ELL AS 4 GO"O"'AL VILLAGETC-tILOTS. THEMSDUFTML ELEMENT OF iNs RA7 IS REFERIED TO AS VILLAGE 7-T E PINOSE OF tIR MVMSION 4 71( MCb.rQA1K NI M LOTS 431 a eTIION NELSON PAIR.AT. THIS MVISED PLAIN MSi M A HE LOSS OF 4 RE.-DEN74l LOTS FROM M PREIDOUYT APMOVEO Pr1ASE 5 PRtLAYIART rLAT. LOdADH 99U AM P1NAlE OPEN SPACES DEDICATED TO APO MAt17AAET1 BY M NOMEONEA'S ASSOCMTDIL 3-ALL �EMING ST.UCTURMeE S Vr7HN THIS PLATTED AREA 34kt IENOVED, 4MQ1lAOlIbK ArM KDmM P.U.AMORDN NCFE.IO dL A OIIOR AS DEVELOPMENT OF OF M DEVELOPMENT PLAIN SIRYTTAI. S.M "WING 2ON"O OF THIS PROPERTT 4 rALO.460-M NO EMSTPIC LAIC USE 4 •A0KtILTUYL•. `LVLLAOE TNQADEi ALL MSDENTIAL LOMCCw O% GREENS AM RARIT-OF-RATS. TALL LOTS NTIM THIS SL60ro" AM A1R.ECT 10 THE DEVELOPMENT MCOIATINS ESTABLISIEO FOR TMARRON PNASC V. RECD NOV 251996 ! 5 Er) RENISED PRELIMINARY PLAT ,nMAMN ADDMN PHASE S OUT OF THE OBEDIAH W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.899 N THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE.TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS 23.82 ACRES/ 58 LOTS 2 COMMON GREENS OWNER/DEVELOPERI TIMARROIN LAND CORPORATION 300E CARPENTER FREEWAY. SUITE 1425 RVNG, TEXAS 75062 1214) nt-3333 FAX (214) 54 -0000 ENGINEER[ CARTER 8 BURGESS. W_ 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE. SUITE 250 DALLAS. TEXAS 75247 (214) 638-0145 FAX 04) 638-0447 NOVEMBER.PM nm� M SEAL AM~ ON T.4 DOCMAEIVT .AS un.omM III To, AL .MSXo L r .4.a M,,[b, t1 2S.ISSLALMU"O" OF A NAM DOnAIM "GRIT FIIOPET .OTrrATDN To M M Mnal ENG."A 6 All OFTENSE IN" THE TEXAS tmcmw. CASE NO. Coe .roe- 96721M . LOT 24 A / 485 Orwrtl.Fdw. M t 3!y K Lap-. Z." r ari3LE FAMLY ND 12 4e007 ; LO M" Dwov BLOCK I TIMBERLAKE SECTION I UD MM DwW a..sAFd LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 21 A/ 485 I A/ 485 I A/ 485 0—. rb.— A L Sw.w M b .b. y Orr P . . N— \ Owe, Om t Cams. AMw Z. w v : WGLE F*&Y FO .2 4e0-07 Z W" : WGLE FM&V PO 42 4e007 Zo.eq : INGLE FAµr qD i2 48007 ; UD M.d 0.wy MN F-2 MN F-2 fir HqH LID M"Owwry eitl,,,,l �{•y %4Ar Y `�!!t� NOO'05'38"W 494.12' ✓ I • 4br9' BI1Ff'E16 fAld 4'1R/6 k-h' • • • 4p FT. BlALOPK>• £ET BACK .. LOT 19 A / 1541 CdLLO W t Do•o G \/ r ^+V 9NGLE FA.LY G-20A I T'MCA, MORONSAT1E LOCAT- LO M.d Owwy I 6 EXSTNG TREES. ...e-•b 11�`11 I I LOT 20 A/485 Z--. El t=110 n 4&3-07 LID M.d Dw,*y i g i A." t 3755 AZFar� �• r . hf I - B.g.,ft Two 75A S / 0 I LIO M.d N_y J+ C— ..\c\\\ Wa.yaod.. Y LOT 20 A / 1541 ?..r La.-r<. CT,w.,p t Miy ro Z—V 9N3LE FMALY fy0A LO M.d Dwwy e«ldna i MN F-2 8' HGH MASONRY SCREEwNG� DEVICE \ BLOCK 2 LAKE CREST A / 1541 r ' I I I I N I I I 0 I I IS 0 B (P i I I ni I II Ln I11A•_fy, 0 ...-46TFT.-SQCDAV9'SYT+S/.EaG- laae.'Y Zaw 3 .we swimA11C � A h . S 021503' W 255.33' ........ --- MN F-2 8• HGH MN. F-1 6' HCH SOW** DEVICE scW*r5 LOT 21 MASONRY DEVICE A / 1541 Orr. F.a. N .- Ine Za.wp : ROLE FA.IY r-20A LID M.d Da-y Concept Plan LO foal W. Cr-. LdA A.d H...o — A— Zw.wp: SNXE FA.LY IFS OA Lake Crest Drive SCALE: I" = 30'- �a737PrT; �1i11�,�foH S02.18'29'•W 241.45• NO NEW ACEES d WFOED FOR TM EXSTm CO.NK.N ACCESS STE BECAME OF EWTM LOCATOr• CF ALONG EA33" W.E. 01I�TAp NW-MgrNABy TE pDRVEMAI 0WH0 WQ NAB CAN NOT E AET O 0 Tw 1ACYdw. 2000 E NW. Fakes Sv/da., Two Z—v 01 LMO M.d Dwwy R.elwai LrndFea�e ad 20 bullw yard along FIA WOO SwN*o Rvd.. type M 10 buffer yard along vomot. r*ddsntW SouuthTy&W "at ,**party IMF SdWfr yard a d10 rd wd pr0"(y iM adjacent b 0-1 zerdrng, Type A SOX of bdlldbq roe. or .- 9A00 e4 It R•Vldked WO W Grm A - butler Ya 8rch To Be PSovWod Buffer yard along rrWrntW to be Typo F-2 Buffer yard alorp FM 1709 to be Type P Buffer yard along 0-1 zaunYq to form. as Type A. LrdSoape ProvWed Y ere Al bul(.1 to be provided pperer ardnulee. rafr to table, Doveloper iderndF h irrigate and leek Wn RO.W. at F fT09 Soutldaku Nvd. fr */- 4.300 at R of londwoiq. area, 6ltorbr to buff: yrdt N- S7.000 o% It w */- 44.3/. of At. to M IrndSoapod Grave Ana PnwWod •/- 50,000 i1 (Mbnlve of FM 1700 RO.W.) Fong betty 0-1 zonnkng wW now SP-2 to be rewoved i-- O CD C 0 E...F PA BOY DIKAS AE LIE600' TEXA S Z- Q AG LO Ls D-wy Shady Oak Owr FMDOe eaOY OAS LM 6001010 ALTO Od1.LAt TEXAS Z," : CCNNBOAL C-2 LW MM Dwwy SUMMARY CHART — BUFFERYARDS M11Md F...FY A.w.1 !+W iw./e-.a4y Mww. La.ew 1aPN-ryi. R.w R... 1weN • r.1-M W J W t 4 NwR�1\4r I 34. .Iww - e.w... 1r a• -A 3 13 Now 1 ram~ w� Fi�MAe• iw w-1i w T w I-JT( ..raY e� e, e.••.. )]1' w-n 4 m iT n-T.w W. rw.wi 4Nr w •F nwnrw a3M' w1 13 3f w F-1 r 11w.Ay .Sow. W- a w � ; -Tw• d.w ..d/.. w..•d•i 4wir 1. wive. w.A.A \ w.dP.. M�a• Ye, .•4.1•a r•rA F. n•..•eN AA11�woMna. W.FFa (3n w � � "a-•�i M W � IMwi w M. d aa�lY.ri iwN� 4..r .1w\ r 1Mray-1 .N .ddl�lww REC'D NOV 13 1996 Location Map IarYr1 ptaCllTpN \Wa • LFt.w M1I MI �•Y \ f.IM11 MM•�I eu�ll MifMGI � Fl\T•wM 1�i�rw. x. \i�F F\w�YrM Md w •..a..l \ Yr. M►iy� •rl OM f yT.�w.l Mr. Trw W iY r I.ri 1•Ae �" i.•N•\Ar �\.. eew••w .l. Ve4..dw wr Ar4rrarr• w.e e..r.. i.Md Iw .ywy w. eew �ww.e i. r\nw d 41 rA aver L Ta4r Ldaa.4.r. t wwv 4 01\.1 A aY MIa, tvl tea. rw..1 O-N. T.w. neww i..a r 4.ew w d+rr. r.wr \ — So'. 1mM e•7• w.iaYy wQYwd�. w wr�i•w\w •�\ �N ti ..d \•W r r iwerwr wi- d W 1iiY e.e 1NBQ Y.4Aw a re,. w..we 1w.L.ard 11609i •. uV a..r wrriwlwA .w.rwr\. w..\MrrLAl4 aor,r 41.�era••w •��..r w..t d•a r!►.rdu•w u M-i IwIIK[®r. weM M\. Ve ire"eI u+¢r%roNtle r w u eA enr L r.N ;»• U.......r.wK ..-.Mo GIWLIl�l f1 ...d L So LIM. •DC1W l f• WI u au aua.rua w L — L-C FSr01 4.\r. .1--\r Paarrr aeve.•c CONCEPT PLAN FOR Shedv OdtF C•nM Saar e, T•raa Tarrant County Aa PT-P- Eby DOH Dovl" (IVIVB8) HMey 1117 CrwtvMw Kau(wan. Tom 75142 IOT21 902-40M Current Owwr of Property: Morvin C. and SoAe A Kanledy M t/r. Uan Oelolrrt Praddrd Terse Land Fed Bun" Company W50 N. Central Emp eee..y. Surdw 440 Dadma, Tom T52M CNI 692-OSM Curent Zsr� AG Zorlklg f4gweZa SP-2 THE RXLOWNG 1}r• UIES NA L E ELS a TFD ew+.•p �v t Loa. lae•m. t w.p t..c.. b.pbv.w+ t•uc.a Redo �d t Rod E T.or.l- >..rMc.e Rid Edell d.wr DrT ad CanelY F¢iY en.MIA[pd M Oo\a OM 1r.t FM F.e. RdSae aw oM KA" .eMCM Site Ares ♦/- 2.9S4 err &A*q One•. T.3B0 of T- 4.900 of Total 19,IB0 of TyPwnlI t.. SIy. -'"' . B� au" t1Fr Cowweroitf;MfedWW 0"1" Pwkkv Rog4rod 74 Solon. Prkkp F.WWed Be Mtb et Pwkkn6 V216 Bulk" DAPS Al buldlr.pi .0 west the wkdwut r•gdrewent for rtlrAation and dodge Per n1. Cerddr Overlay Zone Reg deam 0 O SCALE: r• = 30'-0" NORTH CASE NO.Z A 96-90 DEVELOPED BY LAXAS D and BUILDING COMPANY (2141 692-8522 CAWBELL CENTRE SUTE. 440 8150 N. CENTRAL DALLAS. TEXAS 1296 l� Cn w W F- W Y J O w DATE IV➢/96 DESIGNS A00M MAI RNgC 19721 962-40W sAa NID-ww r Site Data Summaru Existing Zoning - "AG" Proposed Zoning - "S-P-I" with varied "C-2" uses Land Use Designation - "Medium Density Residential" Area of Open Space (approx.$9,-15a-cf.) Percentage of Open apace (approx. G1.947.) Estimated start of construction March 1, ISW Estimated finish of construction Dec. 31, 1998. Maximum 51dg. Height - 20l (AcTul, APPl:bc I&) Maximum No. of children- 360 Required Parking - 3GO c141L1 9% + 5 eF'/ctHlzi - 12 --flcES Provided Parking - Standard, 5andicap, Total 12 Required Loading Space6 - 2 -(td x 5d) Provided Loading Spaces - 2 Owners: Realtex ventures, Inc. 1825 Wimbledon Drive Arlington, Texas i6011 (811) 184-15S41 Fax: (811) 468-9521 Contact: Mr. Jim Mills Architect: Gary Wood Architect 806 E. Abram Street Arlington, Texas 16010 (811) 184-9941 Fax: (811) 468-9521 Contact: Mr. Gary Wood _ -rctXL (,,brio AReA _ ( 3, 20i kFt6) l 3q , 683 sr - TbrrAL 15ADW& Xgr--X 20,500 5F MONUMENT SIGN Buffer -yard Calculations SUMMARY CHART - BUFFERYARDS Locrim Lma6 Bd%-Y-d Width - Typ. Cmlopy Tfem Aoriet Trim With. Floe) Saamtr[ fie a 6fineY1 Nardi- Requied 22T 2a•0 9 7 nh horded' Emt- R.Tkw Wr W-FI it 37 49 Ft Fmne provided• Swill- Requited 237 I0-FI 7 14 IS Ft few Povided• W-- Regaled Wr S-A 6 12 A Provid.d- •Noe try trod'. M teetim 42.4f mod in calcvl.6- 01hrr camnlrt.: I. Where petlq to pvelded bo n im the hiWip wilmot Him mud public RO. W, Ikuhe ohtdeil[ 6 memo height of three (oet P1 a 6mtr slap h laplmtrd is miu� specit{ of thirty mdoes P09 m cerlrer cmnkhhm Ploy in p.tad ed`. of the picking Or hies eeu 2. SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAM Reg hwin F,kW Lmdre.pefm A (Sq. R.) %.(-bt 69.te rids Cmlopy Thus Acoml Trim Skt1b9 Olomd CNrur (3%PL) RegaieC IOj50 75% 17 34 171 1025 F1p.idea 'Nose icy tledib pe eectioe IJ-e a.1d Y relnYlom: 06. Ce®Ier.: 1. 11,AX,T 1A, 12.J. tXMW 5UK-t7(, X-1255 SEW. o Ired d lane M d NN R J. learn Surwr. d-IDS, n, TM Cft of Saud- , Tenant Coudy. Tr.o9. arq erxNer4 by mil« aM tiered. « foboe: etc-iC don iron roe hay d the nomweel came d Ld 1. bock 1. Caha. I69h S, Me6en, m okNen to 1Pe CRY d Cantos, Toned CwrM, 1«w, INe9rd'w9 to Its Plot reeerdee In Cobkw A Sxa ft. 1e60. Plot R«aM d lerr.nl amty, To.er- qd Iron Wn, M 1M Nets Fw of SovinkM 6oNe.ard (F M 1709) ory eloo twi4 w the renlmen pep" Fir Mween the Steno aM Pi- twt; accardirq 10 Nro 8-do, 119nween4 merged it volurrw 9287. Po9. 1966, 0.. Racers. d Toned Caudy. Teas: THENCE N 69' 2r 1a- E .Rh tM .aAh srhe ofSoun- Gala w4 (r.Y. 1709). 125.61 het 10 m inn nil NN for comes. THENCE S O Ot' 3S E 606.33 fM to m iron red M e Ih. wd N d Sin- IRtae - Pho« One, m odtIN n to Ih. City d SednM.. Toned c-,,. 7- akkerlfp h Nw out eras.o w cub-0 A See No. 915 aM lie. Plat iti-ft d Tenet C-ty. Teeak THENCE S a► 33ST R NTh the wst M d Sau Laken - PHa« 0". 125.67 Mt 1e m ion rod fame 'r ,he eM Fw d Lot 1. Bloc. 1, Cason Wqh Sehod Met- .alo ion Ming e Hr. eor,,rrron Gr.. oi Ins S1- aM Pi- teen- xeare..p to Its Mil 6am4ary AW-1, eM Its a9re.e wM lirw d Nw Proem Nast; THENCE N O 01- Ir in wan M non, en. of Carts hC'9h SCNM Melee 60609 'Nut N,M Puce d 6.9ir"i'9• emtoinirq 1.75. acres (76.et 2) sauna 1M d leer!. -MAc7 1A-1, F.J. fxmg SURD(, 4-1255 _BEING a rail d hoer oil a Its R J. Para &-,. •-fM w TM oty d SeuN+rte. T-i Comty, Twos, and Wecrie.4 by mil« one booed. « fo.oes: eEONNNNC d m ion roe huts d Its -out nalMrs, nplhwed eamw d Slos t,nwn - plies One, m -Rion to Its CRy d So,A-.. Tared Cantor. Tens, aCCorerq b Its PIa1 rerard.d In Coo,M 1 Side No $15 aM 916. Plot Reeerh d Tame Carmly Te.oa see M 6•"'9 e 1M sodh Fee of suun oh. 8-4 (.4. I me): THE S 0 01. 36' E wits M Neal Fr. d Saw La - Phss Orr., 609.53 het h s Ire,, ro4 tours fa cor,,w: ' THENCE S 69 33- Si w with tM -HO thee. of Slaw tas« - PM« 0r , 103.K lid To m W- m4 M Ion carer: THENCE N 0 Oi' 36- w 6m.33 fM tom iron rod NK w Ifw no- Fw .t SadldaR. 6o-- (TSr. tX79) 1w comer. THENCE N 69' 27' iW E u- [ .aulh Fw d SodhloM "'m"" (r.lo. IM9) t0J.99 feet to Its Pioc. of 6e9imirp, Cm-" 1.453 err« (63.271 saasa Its) er 4A. 1. GCTtMoK Ll &tfrN& to 09 L CATW iN 'THE HA 4 rA1Qt & ISLMV, eKretdaR FtcB of WLVIFI(s A9D C14 5*U?RJ6 SoFFlT,5. L-104T1W, -'*LL. f 51TUTW Ill 6I1CH A MANNfrK 3o A5 ter ro Aame sa -f Ame::T xcuc 4r PKOPEKTIES, 2 iN eAVEO 115E THE 6p B LS . etc qt ( 9IXVW' WITH ro"OL& t1,5E TbK rn-rAiTs jtR0w&AKrbi4 _. 3 A i M t1VKiWr 614 W W tt V%U-Ev PER" urt Cr *,Lv1.1 re SrCGricAloNS P HAR1 61t:, NA ,* eV6'-rt 'L TR 05 Block . Zoned C-3 Zoned C-3 cioeral Commerclal C-al Commo'clal Mixed (lee � ntxod U.e I - Approx 1466' to peytonville eve. 6=14LAPM BLVD. Mm. nos) (U'0' R.OL).) A.phelt p4vtng W- e' MAh "nio tied Orin ink fmroe.sting Islet pnnpmty nun. weell dung W r N�1 M.ee3, sew+ ra CAFJWLL NIGH 6CWCOL Zoned &M (460-34) De idled 64te Plan Pblie / heel-Publb 6S.2o1 AcCM!� M 71415 Rr.L PAMt4 ")UK�Vvte--((, A-f255 - cirf Of- VO("L+cKe, TdKMk# IZIUAY, T006 Site Plan iLq[BAN f7ttIT1�AF- �y(/j�y�N��(l�� w d E SCALE: 1 =40'- Southlake, Texas 14 OCT 96 _-_4a----b. Lot 1, Block 6 SoutMidge Lakon Notneayner6 Aeaoclatlorm ZOnled C-3 Medh- Derelty Raeldonlal x. 200' to Waterford Dr We. 6 Southrldge Laka P..q Row. Lot 1, Block T 6ouWake Proportion J.V. FUD No. 3 stone Lakon 480-33 IeSAO' Loadng . Zane ffW,WV a' WI&.pad auun" f- ekxhp east prop-4 Lot 2, Block 1 6outtdaka lmr,eu to J.) INW No. 3 Stone Lakes 460-33 1 l� rL4T. -a. R%C-e MA:1 N LLoft7 WTl�r�! Tiz4--T 1A T4cr 1A-1 Lot 10, Block 1 Danlel C.W ea FW No. 3 store Lakes ASO-33 OtWlnB V toed uar..r1A fehpe tithe -Nth properly Me Lot A ISlock t Dou94e N6horf PUD No.3 stone Lakes 400-33 Lot 3, Block 1 r I John A, l4udool PUD No. 3 6tore Lakes 00 4W-33 ^' V 0 f� Lot 4, Block 1 Willem Warless I'M No. 3 Mono Lakes AW-33 Lot 5, Block T Southlaka Proportion J.V. PM No. 3 Mane Lakes AW-33 Lot 6, Block 1 Cheri« Wave PUD, No. 3 Stone Lakes 460-33 TLot 1, Block T 6C.L40ke Properties J.V 1`110 No. 3 Stone Lakes AW-33 Lot 6, Block 1 John 1Eapich PUD No. 3 Mono Lakes 460-33 1I V W O m ) -15,D 5 - a J.P. h G.H. STRUNCK c- G - V. 6365, P. 206 D.R.,T.CO.'TX. > U AG LLD - MED. DENSITY FESIXNT ALTRCE _ C Q _ - Ui (fYPIGI) 1r D.J. 4 LA MtTCHELL V. 6818, P. 1094 -:. ;, D.R.,TCO.,TX. ; _ SF:-1A S a8'46'55' E (LED. OEt'6RYBdML 5 8954'44' E ............�. 1'. - 444.04' ,/r IJbi. _ .._.....:..e• SL11E01 FENOE - - ----------------------- 12 j 4 i l2 YA MFp1O 1 C f ' 1 sE• 18 1 • jO:'i __ V x w .� _. L ,-^_' I W 'Bo 4 o x w.. LOWNG ZOW ONE-STORY Lir e cw 11 2 i p 5 OFFICE 11"NO 9Jl00 SF. 2 I jF -h _ 2 >� �. •3 ?u. - i ..tea WTI'_ U >� • TREE COVER a a+ • 1u %... i O(E_y-(O,n' `� (TVPIaL).... OFFICE BUILDING .a �- 9 ... ..... 2�.. 16727 F. ca- ' {je o�n (' •e ov / {\f o.x •>c y t - x. c > e�� T, c,,,: 4 r> a f 1 ! THE FECHTEL CROUP V. 9811, P. 1241 D.R..T.CO.,TX. s r C3 .- ` :�✓ �-�. • Y I 1� LID - 6O® USE 1 a.. a oa '_ It Ors _ _ ____ ✓,E_ _ r / .... '.J Y 3 1AFBik'cEP E3—E•_ S 89'152a' W r* IIOrI 101.1a' - N n s a9'OS'27' W R..s,c Ian eos rcR r.._.................._......................_.......................c...........................-...._.......................1..t...af]'.Cb..DRr:E_tO.A...CARR0.t1,.._.......-... ' C . 11,11'OS' L - 32209 _ — SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F.M. 1709) ,_ q LC. N 89'53'29' W W.W. HALL S(JFiV ( a-6 ra W7KARV EACC SURVEY A-481 O.W. MaT SJR':f=" A-899 — -_ — -_ — _— — — — — _ - _ — — — — — Owner/Develeper: ( M ♦ M C1IROUP, IN(.::. TIMARRON LAND CORP. r] 51111E TS7 Y. )000(, P. XX% AMTA PRADE V. r.%XX, P. XXX 100 W. SOUMLAKE ILVD.. #320 SOUTHLAXE, TEXAS 79092 O.R.,T.CO..TX. AG I D.R..T.CO..TX, Ix e17-329-6119e LUD - ME0. DENSITY Mscewtc AG LUD - UM DENSITY FESCeftIAL I U Zvi EaBineen/Planners: J. M L.EVIT'T 1SVE9INBE1@5. INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 1 7M Ca THLAKE STREET SUDS ,� SOUIHUK[ TEXAS 75092 (017) 4e8-3313 I�ECp N O U 111996 surveyors: GENERAL NOTES AL -AN WARD 8NQ CO. P.O BOX a2132 21327 1. TOTAL 9=. AREA - 26.527 S.F. FORT WOR771, TEXAS 76152 2. ILr0tlsiED PARKING - 98 SPACES OFFICE: e17-834-0897 FAX: e17-ILA-0940 3. PSOPQ¢D PARKING - 120 SPACES 4. 01 DCAAT1O16---------- --MOUE s n ORITTIFOOD CE PARK LOCATTOM MAP PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BEING all of that certain let tract or parcel of lend situated in the W.W. HALL SURVEY, A-695, City of Southleke, Tarront County Taros, OW being a part of that same tract of land described In deed to CFNVESTS Southlake Joint Ventura, recorded In Volume 8564, Page 265 of the Deed Records of lament County, Texas, and said parcel being more particularly described ae follows, BEGINNING at a monument found for comer at the present intersection of the west R.O.W. line of N. Carrel Avenue (a variable width R.O.W.) with the north R.O.W. fine of Southloke Boulevard (F.M. 1709-a 130' RAW); THENCE N FIT 05' 2Y W. 101.18' along the north line of Southleka Boulevard to a monument found for comer at the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of OV 36, OS' and a radius of 11.524.16% THENCE around said curve end a" the north fee, of Sou6doke Boulevard, d detarlca of 322.09' to a monument found far comer, THENCE S 89' 18' 26' W. 121.51' along the north line of Southlake Boulevard to a 3/e iron rod set at the southernmost southeast corner of that some tract of land described in deed to DJ. @ LA. Mdahell, recorded In Volume 6818. Page 1094 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Tomit: THENCE N OV 10' OS 1. 2S3.15' along the east ins of said Mitchell property to a 1/T iron rod found for comer, THENCE S 86 46, 56' E. 104.45' along the Mitchell property One to a 1/Y ton rod found at the southwest comer of that same trod of land described in deed to J.P. k G.H. Stnmck, recorded in Volume 6365, Page 206 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Tams; THENCE S ST 54' 4C E 444.04' Bong the south One of said Strunck ProPerty to a 1/Y iron rod found for comer in west line d N. Carroll Avenue; THENCE S DO 55' 36' W. 201.05' along the west line of N. Carroll Avenue to the place of beginning end containing 152.823.68 square feet or 3.5083 acres of Wnd. . Orighd Scale : i' - 40, V W M NP Grdphld Sale In Felt CONCEPT PLAN CRESTWOOD OFFICE PARK AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS W.N. HALL SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 695 PRESENT ZONING - AG LUD - MED. DENSITY EXISTING USE - VACANT PROPOSED ZONING - S-P-2 T TH 01 USES 3.508 ACRES 29 OCTOBER 1996 Bl1.T N JOE HEAL 6MeR VOL- 67n. PILE 2" OJLTJ-T. , �\ 1 LZD1 ED BACK L.U.O.- M•60) q6E W W9oHRY >XREEM WALL aoPiD roiie I UA. - MEDIUM DENSITY 1ESOORVL - - 3 Or Of2r W 300./4' 0 �.� PE AW III TYNIION LAND CORP. a' LOT 2, L" da VOURE NK7. PME pyL�AJ , Y LJ1E1®TRW" IOOfipN PHAW6 O6„66L41 S0. FT.OF 3.H4 ACRES Y LLO.- M•6D USED W. E1l1ORNIY SCHOOL 16 APPROVED PNUL PLAT TVAARRON ADDITION PHASE 6 'R LOT L BLOCC 60 VOLUME 6627, PACE 0T7 OJLT CGT. z t-tl0 - MO® USED 20NNC - R4'UD lo�ati n m I) site plan DATE iVNn PRIDECT' 6666 PFNSED Bri LN c 30 rw O 20 40 soverom SCALE- r'-40' @mla®latlsms aKX" N►JG WSULAna• wrMOILSIJ aLDC 11M. - EDO. BF. s m. TTPE S.F.07 2 - RETAIL 6A,ZZ757S0 4 - AIL i,127 ssy. NE AL TOTAL 26.269 S.F. PHASE I PAI80A TABU Afl01<s LOT 1Ma. - wym IEOWFlOYtR9 LD 0.1 BLD0.2 - 7/N 8L11C 3 - 6mV63 LDC.4 - 31/31 TOTAL SPACES OE4D/PROVV7 •6/T73 STE AREA TAL2AIMMi CAC.) LOT Mw - LOT AIF.A S M DOVERAOE 3 O'HA9E O - 3JIO0 AC. •.562 TOTAL - 3.500 AC. 1C.S6R OPEN !PACE TALRATEM VAC.! LOT VA. - N" P610ENTAgE 3 aNWE D - 2AW AC. IM443C TOTAL - 2J160 AC. BL44X E�INCAUAWAY %**= %w X ms�u Ve ms (DEews) Partners V, L.P. do Dram Realty Group �� XOIw1,1 Xd \ PROPERTY IS N THE PROCESS OF BENT - - \ PLATED BY CARTER-OLF40 S ENGINEERING \ \ Q EXISTING TREES (END NOV 111996 40 PROPOSED DECORARVE LIGHT SGNACE-SHOPPING CENTER MONUMENT SIGN BY TNARRO -TENANT SIG6 ON LRDNC FACE OR AWNING verimmes ELEVATION HEIGHT3ETIL-M QC4HC OPDNAAICE, SECTION 43.10 STOFURON -USE OF WOOD ENTRY E tslemlmtl®ms •WIRY CHART - LlP01YN0• LamnoN Lamm WDTVTYP[ viw /fim LOAM P610[/601@MO MOM NEW PROMO 233.12' 20'-0 6 6 7 7 20 20 NOW EAST RM RIOMO 494-W 10,fl s 6 3D 30 40 40 CMASONRY SCREEN WALL SOUTH REOU PROV9 NONE NEST RNE09 gV9 W-W s -ANow2 y } 3 n T WTEi NDTN OF awE1PwY3 Wwt OEDuc1EDFLrowa1MVN SF1OT�ioHizs0.� YAM FOR PLMITS CA_QAAipNS Q , L%w %w •ANDS NEOLAO 7,,:-:: REOIRiED 14.100 S.F. 7&OOX 24 46 236 t4u SF. PROVIDED I n--.n SF. 75s9X 1 24 1 46 1 236 tots SF. PEVPsn1e4 6/26n6 ls/sbrn LN CALLAWAY v/:a/as LN • • ® AT3 06rtaRae NiVIM rycVrfwr+wnrfa Ddh.6 %— 75 E/HI�T>Q DA1�Yr.� rsrr x�I 7»se we Qtalasaa• • z • Q t!1 d 2 FF�y cc� ICI L �Oy� E � � 1 M Q W N A'L L� DRAM AD CHEIDPQ D 10, Ben WME �SITE�j � il./L"lli SP-3 Case No. LAA 96-134 Ic SCALE 1 " = 20' STATE HWY. 114 W Z s zo S ITE m W %"ss,,Ile, ., m s F. M. 1709 _SOUTH LAKE BLVD. J Q m VICINITY MAP STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: WHEREAS, LIBERTY BANK hereinafter called "Owner" (whether one of more), is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in or within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Tarrant and Denton Counties, Texas, being more particularly described hereon for all purposes: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100 ($1.00) DOLLAR, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, Owner(s) do(es) hereby waive, release, quitclaim, and forever hold harmless the City of Southlake, Texas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter call "City", from any and all claims for damage of any kind that Owner(s) may now have or may hereinafter have in the future by reason of the passage of all aircraft ("aircraft" being defined for the purposes of this instrument as any contrivance now known or hereinafter, invented, used, or designed for navigation of or flight in the air) by whomsoever owned and operated, in the air space above Owner's property, as hereon before described, and above the surface of Owner's property such noises, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft landing at or taking off from, or operating at or on the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; and Owners do hereby fully having remiss, and release any right or cause of action which it may now have or which it may in the future have against the City, Whether such claim be for injury to person or damage to property due to noises, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel and lubricant particles, and all the other effects that may be caused or may ave been caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off from, or the operation and/or� maintenance of aircraft or aircraft engine at or on said Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. It is agreed thpt this release shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs and assigns, and successors in interest with regard to said property located in or in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, running with the land, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of Tarrant County or Denton County, as appropriate, Texas. Executed this 24th day of October, A.D., 1996. Steve Ingham, President Approved by the Planning dt Zoning Commission Date: Chairman: P&Z Secretory: Approved by the City Council Mayor: City Secretary JIM PARKER VOL 11160 PG. 975 7317 WHITFIELD GK. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 3.72 AC. OUT OF TRA OF W.E. MAYFIELD SUBDIVISION APPROVED FINAL PLAT LOT 1, BLOCK 1 L.U.D.=MIXED USE, C-2 GEORGETOWN PARK ADDITION 3.058 AC. GEORGETOWN MONTICELLO PARTNERS, LTD. COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. D196186656 COUNTY CLERK'S RECORDS / TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS APPROVED FOR FILING S a��c� 2�4i� ,ems • V 166 S6 . 4,T N APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT LOT 2, BLOCK 1 GEORGETOWN PARK ADDITION 3.058 AC. GEORGETOWN MONTICELLO PARTNERS, LTD. COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. D 196186656 COUNTY CLERK'S RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS APPROVED FOR FILING WETZEL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD. VOL. 10179 PG. 971 102 WESTLAKE DR. # 106 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746-5373 ZONED "AG" L.U.D. = MIXED USE 1/2" I.R.F. HARLEY EATON VOL.12266 PG. 1602 RE.1—B1 & TR. 1-131A 2550 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. 0.95 AC. W.E. STATE pF TEXAS } COUNTY OF TARRANT { WHEREAS, Liberty Bank, acting by and through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent, is the sqle owner of a tract of land situated in the W.P. Mayfield Addition, County of Tarrant, according to the deed recorded in Volume 12222, Page 1970, Deed Records, Tarrgnt County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BFING a tract of land out of the THOMAS EASTER AND THE S. FREEMAN SURVEYS, situated irl Tarrant County, Texas, and being part of LOT 1, pf the W.E. MAYFIELD Subdivisiorj as recorded in Volume 388—C, Page 4, Plot Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin in the Northerly R.O.W. line of E. Southlake Blvd., said point being South 72 degrees 30 minutes East 290.0 feet and North 06 degrees 22 minutes East 22.19 feet from the Southwest corner of said LOT 1, W,E. Mayfield Subdivision; THENCE North 6 degrees 22 minutes East 154.94 feet to an iron pin for the northwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes East 206.2 feet to an iron pin at fence corner for the Northeast corner �f the herein described tract; THENCE South 6 degrees 22 minutes West 224.31 feet alon a ,fence line to an iron pin at fence corner in the Northerly R.O.W line of said East Southlake Blvd. for the Southeast corner of the described tract; THENCE North 70 degrees 38 minutes 50 seconds West 210.39 feet along said R.O.W. line to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.892 acres of land. NOTE: According to Flood Insurance Rote Map, dated Jan. 01, 1993, SOUTHLAKE, Texas, Co munity No. 480812g, this lot IS NOT in a Flood Hazard Area. TLot is in Zone X) Selling a portion of any lot within this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of state low and city ordinance and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, Liberty sank, by and through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent, does hereby adopt this plat designating the herein above described property as Lot 1 R1, Block 1, W.E. Mayfield Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and I do hereby dedicated the rights of way, (alleys, parks) and easements shown thereon to the public's use unless otherwise noted. This plat does not alter or remove existing deed restrictions or covenants, if any, on the property. WITNESS my hand at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas this the ___ __day of— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 19_ Steve Ingham, president STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared STEVE INGHAM, of LIBERTY BANK, a corporation known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated, and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the __—__day of -------------- 19------ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS — STATE OF TEXAS { COUNTY OF TARRANT { THIS is to certify that I, Ernest Hedgcoth, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from a actual survey on the ground; and that all lot corners, and angle points, and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me or under my direction and supervision. ERNEST HEDGCOTH, P.E. _ DATE — REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 2804 PLAT REVISION LOT 1R1, BLOCK 1 MAYFIELD ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 0.892 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS FASTER, ABST. #474 & THE S. FREEMAN SURVEYS, ABST. #575 RECORDED VOL. 388-C, PAGE 4, TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS OWNER: LIBERTY BANK 5801 DAVIS BLVD. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET _____, SLIDE DATE: 0 A z w RECD DEC 2 31996 ERNEST HEDGCOTH CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. 5701—C, MIDWAY ROAD FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117 (817) 831-7711 a PRINTED: DECEMBER 3, 1996 CASE NO. ZA 96-149 SCALE JIM PARKER 731`7 WHITFIELD CK. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 3.72 AC. OUT OF TR.1 OF W.E. MAYFIELD SUBDIVISION ZONED "C-3" L.U.D. = MIXED USE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPROVED FINAL PLAT 1" = 20' SOOT S 89°47'00"E 203' TO DRIVEWAY 206,20` C:1`0 V L 66' TO-BR,IVEWAY _� RD (730, _ _ L❑T 1, BLOCK 1 L.U.D.=MIXED USE, C--2 V GEORGETOWN _PARK ADDITION Q 3.058 AC. GEORGETOWN MONTICELLO PARTNERS, LTD. COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO, D196186656 COUNTY CLERK'S RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS APPROVED FOR FILING _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ e I,tUKVt I UWN MUM I IULLLU F'AK I NLKS, LTD, COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. D196186656 COUNTY CLERK'S RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS APPROVED FOR FILING WETZEL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD. 102 WESTLAKE DR. #106 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746-5373 ZONED "AG" L.U.D. = MIXED USE i 1 ------------------ DUMPSTER EKED 4 SIDES (MIETAL GATE 1SONRY SIMILAR TO BLDG PROP. 6' BRICK/ STOCKADE FENCE 26' COMMON ACCESS ESMT HARLEY EATON TR.1-131 & TR. 1-131A 2550 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. 0.95 AC ZONED AG L.U.D. = MIXED USE PARKING REQUIRED = 18 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED 24 SPACES BUFFERYARDS VIDTH-STD CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SHRUBS GROUND com (sn NORTH �06' REQUIRED ;' A 2 4 17 PROVIDED !Il' A 2 4 17 EAST 224' REQUIRED 1o, B 5 7 22 PR VID D REQUIRED Ro' D e 6 30 PROVIDED to, 0 8 6 30 WEST 155' REQUIRED 3' A 2 3 12 PROVIDED 5' A 2 3 12 AREA CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SHRUBS INTERIOR LANDSCAPING REQD, 1570 3 5 26 157 INTERIOR LANDSCAPING PROVIDED 4782 3 5 26 157 LANDSCAPE TO BUILDING AREAS PARKING REQUIREMENTS *TOTAL AREA OF LOT: 38876.8 S.F. BUILDING & PARKING AREAS: PROPOSED BUILDING USABLE AREA: 3170 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING SLAB AREA: 3425 S.F. PARKING LOT & SIDEWALK AREA: 25530 S.F. *LANDSCAPE & GREENSPACE AREA: 9921.8 S.F. *RIGHT OF WAY (R.O.W.) AREA: 2008 S.F. CONCRETE APPROACH: 531 S.F. LANDSCAPE -GREEN AREA: 1477 S.F. *TOTAL AREA: 40884.8 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA: 11398.8 S.F. NON BUILDING USE AREA: 35451.8 BUILDING SITE COVERAGE: 8% PARKING REQUIRED: 18 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 24 SPACES SUMMARY L.U.D, = MIXED USE EXISTING ZONING = C-2 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE=BEGIN 11/1/96 PROPOSED USED = BANK GROSS ACREAGE=0,892 NET ACREAGE=0,892 AREA OF OPEN SPACE= 9922 SQ.FT. PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE=23% EXISTING TREE COVER = 10% BEING A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE THOMAS EASTER AND THE S. FREEMAN SURVEYS, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS AND PART OF LOT 1, W,E, MAYFIELD ADDITION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-C, PAGE 4 TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS OWNER: LIBERTY BANK 5801 DAVIS BLVD. NORTH RICHLAND TARRANT COUNTY, VICINITY MAP BEING a tract of land out of the THOMAS EASTER AND THE S. FREEMAN SURVEYS, situated In Tarrant County, Texas, and being part of LOT 1, of the W.E. MAYFIELD Subdivision as irecorded In Volume 388-C, Page 4, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract being more particulary described by rgetes and bounds as follows, BEGINNING at an Iron pin in the Northerly R.O.W. line of E, South(ake Blvd., said point being South 72 degrees 30 minutes East 290.0 feet and North 06 degrees 22 minutes East 22.19 feet from the Southwest corner of said LOT 1, W.E. Mayfield Subdivision] THENCE North 6 degrees 22 minutes East 154.94 feet to an iron pin for the northwest corner of the herein described tract] THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes East 206.2 feet to an Iron pin at fence corner for tKe.Northeast corner of the herein described tract) THENCE South 6 degrees 22 minutes West 224.31 feet along a fence line to an Iron pin at fence corner in the Northerly R,O.W line of said East Southlake Blvd. for the Southeast corner of the described tract] THENCE North 70 degrees 38 minutes 50 seconds West 210.39 feet along said R,O.W, line to the POINT OF BEGINNING and contq.ining 0,892 acres of land. NOTE; 1, According to Flood Insurance Rate Map, dated Jan, 01, 1993, SOUTHLAKE, Texas, Community No, 480612g, this lot IS NOT In a Flood Hazard Area, (Lot is in Zone X) NOTE; 1, UTILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS, 2. FIRE HYDRANT L❑CATI❑N AS REQUIRED BY FIRE CHIEF. 3, 24' FIRE LANE AS DIRECTED BY FIRE CHIEF. 4, BM 584,78-RR SPIKE IN POWER POLE ON THE WEST SIDE OF SHADY LANE SOUTH Or DRIVEWAY AT 1004 SHADY LANE, SITE PLAN FOR PROPOSED LOT W.E. MAYFIELD CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, LIBERTY BANK 1R1, BLOCK 1 ADDITION TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A REVISION OF LOT 1 OF THE W.E. MAYFIELD ADDITION AS RECORDED VOL. 388-C, PAGE 4, TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS Olt WCD DEC 2 3 1996 ERNES' HEDGCOTH HILLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. H 5701—C MIDWAY ROAD TEXAS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117 PRINTED: DECEMBER 23, 1996 (817) 831-7711 CASE, NO. ZA 96—i 9 fw rt I- tent. whtiod d hard copy a mnchur reodn tormot, N copyrighted and tm intdrarnsnt d Ssrr,ces m tispsct W the �roj.ct for which k waa Pnpa�o. ie Thin document r not inlerded or authoraed for .aunt. by a?, party oa erEsnstare of suet- pro)aet w ony other pro}sct. Any Hues, indudkq copying a id/or ^wdM^A 4r dxumen" without stltMn pNmisRon hom �oO�M t ANociat" far the apwC119c yyurrposs intlrWad N ra v(Olatier! - of fed.W copy 4 law. Unauthorized . ntatMiol nmy result in Civil endlp crimind penattim. GRAVEL LOT oP X I , I ! i 0` — I CY-1 0 60 _.. I �O I I I I I I �4 I � �� N� ° P loo, S S M ' _ -�.- ,, ntj,.., GRADING PLAN SCALE: I ` = 30' - 0 10 30 60 100 O Z �T �L 60' 120' 10-80, Z LEGEND lower Pole : ,uy Wire lanhole Hater Valve 'elephone Pedestal Voter Meter ire Hydrant ight Pole ragotion Volvo ;lean Out Jr Conditioner able Box ignal Box ignal Pole ign on Rod Found on Rod Set o a PRO - O Z H cJ 4 W X m Q } j N 0 1t��, U D O t— a a M a � -cn a F rn Q Q 13 Cy 7�15 Pf�.�1� 4l/ �STivG 72 W_� n Zoe C-21 ■ LOT 4 ZONED S-P-2 W/ C-2 DESKMATION 0 10 30 60 100 S.H. 114 22Cr FLOW. a * PZV W i 1 - UTILITIES TO !{ CONNECT W/ EXISTING UTILITIES E,,5 IN KIMBALL AVE. E W FUTURE CURB GUT AND LEFT TURN L NNE ZONED AG i 57EPHEN R. HA&AR WP.O. BOX 644-7 I 5ANTA FE, NEW MEXIGO 81502 I! Qd I� W �Z �i I i TEXACO I GAS/CONVIENIENCE ZONED C-3 MIXED USE I � OWNER: DOU6 EMERY I . I I I I I l BRICK VENEER (ACCENT COLOR) BRICK VENEER (F I ELD COLOR) — DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE: I "= 100' PROFILE BUILDINE i A ►.t. ffts . — — SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 5GALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" CANOPY DE516N AND COLORS TO REF`LEC T OIL COMPANY'S PROTOTYPE NORTH ELEVATION V V L■. V I L.t.."Lttt.e T P1 I/ V I SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 51 TE DATA: EXI5TIN& ZONING= 5-P-2 WITH C-2 DE51NATION L.U.D. = MIXED USE 6RO55 AND NET ACREAGE: 1.186 AGRE5 PERC,ENTAEE OF BUILDINO/SITE GOVERA6E: 10.1% AREA OF OPEN SPACE (LANDSCAPED AREA): 14,241 S.F. AREA OF OPEN 5PACE (LANDSCAPED AREA) A5 PERCENTAGE: 2'7.5'M OUT54DE 5TORA6E A5 A PE;4' ENTAbE: N/A TOTAL SUILDIN& AREA: 52-M 5.F. 56111ARE FOOTA6E 5Y USE: GARHASH - 660 S.F. RETAIL 461q X 65% = 3002 S.F. RESTA44RAdVT 461q X 35% = Ibf7 S.F. TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 521q S.F. PARKIN& GALC.UI..ATIONS: OAP.Io H 660 S.F. O 0 = 0 SPACES REWD RETAIL 461q X 65% = 3002 S.F. O 1/200 = 15.01 OR 15 SPACES � a RESTAURANT 4614 X 35% = 1611 S.F. O 1 /100 = 16.11 OR 16 5PAGE5' I TOTAL SPACES•REQUtRED = 31 TOTAL SPACE PROVIDED - 36 I U 2 ACGE5515LE PARKIN9 SPACES PROVIDED PER ADA ItUFFERYARDS: TYPE AND LOCATION CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SWUM 25' TYPE K O SOUTH (150') 6 q *SEE NOTE BELOW 10' TYPE G O EAST (280') 8 10 *SEE NOTE BELOW 5' TYPE A O WE5T (160') W/ 2 TIMES REQ'D PLANTING 3 6 26 5' TYPE A O NORTH (709 W/ 2 TIMES REQ'D PLANTING 1 3 11 *54OBTAININ6 �A MATURE HEI&HT OF 3' HEIGHT OR GREATER TO BE PLANTED AT A MINIMUM 5PA6IN6 OF 30" O.G. CONT. ALONG PAVED ED6E5 OF THE PARKING I OR DRIVE AREAS. ' INTERIOR LANDSCAPE: AREA OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE REQUIRED - 52141 S.F X 50 = 26343 S.F. REQUIRED CANOPY TREE5 O 11600 S.F. = 5 ! REQUIRED STORY TREES O 1/500 = q r REQUIRED 5HRUB5 O 1/60 = 44 I I REG UIRED 6ROUND COVER = .264 5.F. AREA IF INTERIOR LAND GAPE PROVIDED - 63 7A15F. J ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION 5GHEVIU .E: START 12/16/416 END 2/28/q 7 `PAN -A -FLEX' AWNING AL "NUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM SYMBOL LEGEND � W AREA OF INTERIOR LANDSC- APE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE DUFFER �.� SANITARY SEWER DRAIN LINE _ E — —UNDER&ROUISV ELECTRICAL SERVICE — W — WATER SERVICE Owner. Arsc erew Industries Inc. P.O. Box 20 Grapevine, Texas 76099 -0020 Attiv John T. Eubanks Owner's Agent. Strode Property Co. 10720 Preston Road SWO 100 Dabs, Texas 75230 21'-2" A.F.F. TOP OF PARAPET 18'-I" A.F.F. TOP OF PARAPET r--CARWA511 BEYOND PRO-IEGT LOCATION L N0RTf*4ft1r W.W EAST (SA 114) 1• J EAST SOUTH-AKE BLVP. N Vicinity Map Not to Scale SITE PLAN FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND S.U.P. FOR BEER SALES NW Corner of SH114 and Kimball Ave. Texas Petro III (Lot No. 5) Mesco Addition Thomas Mahan Survey Abstract #1049 Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas Gross Acreage 1.186 AC REC'p NOV 111996 Net Acreage 1.186 AC Existing Zoning S-P-2 w/ C-2 Designation 5 '.•n x ,"t a'.rinel 'n rad ropy r ^•ot.,ine •aaa;bV °c—.% .s co;.ynjh *d . a-net—nent of '.ernasa . "'P*C•. tc the Pr ,l A f, .n:M t —* 010, ned T %c, aC—,ent •, no, .mended n, au".M!Ilea 'a! 'a." + any Ptlly on e>tenaors o+ S.& W01W C• on) othe+ e ir! +ry 'iu■■. :nc..�alr3 -np"l and/or modify;.,.} ^ tloc �n enl .0—t ..,ften petr —Qo f.nn 4�tl9e■ Z^e c�ecfe {.✓p.sa .rtenasC 'a vaW for fs+lera. = PYn9^' we. �na:.tf`4:'+2e4 .Ne o tnlf mote• nay —I in 3n.dl� '.. �n' W Ptnz,tro • ♦ ♦ l • � 7—jjjjjJERjjj0jWA F' 1 M�16l- M►; 1 ill ., ��� + : • 1�1 I I lil LOT 9 I IRIO I LAKE WOOD H ACRES ADDITION — — 4 AC SE 11 I I � I-------------------------� ✓� I VOL. 388-137, PG. 34 ?ill 1 40' D. ! P.R.,T.CO. TX. I} t -"- - � -- -- & J.E.. I I E- I I\1 > m LAKE WOOD ACRES ADDITION - PHASE II z I I ! 4 �CY-IVOL. 388-137, PG. 34 I I _ Qa ! l l I P.R.,T.CO. TX. I I I I20 l{ I ! I I I I I I ZONED SF-1 1.21 AC I 1 ..15' UE ! I LUD _ LOT 8 4 AC LOW DEN. 20' DRG. ESMT. 7 \ / — — ..�. -r'S 89' 10'04" E I I li S 89'1 O'll E 10,...J , T - 523 65 644.37' I I ------------ - --7.5' U.E__ 7.5' U.E.U.E.------- I ---------------- /--------------- 15' UE I -- - - - 184.92 - - - 10 u.E 167.68' �� - - - 136.40' 136.40 1 � 4�' _ 136.40' 269.81 ' 10' a E. 21 1 I 1 I 3 \ 2.32 AC I I1 I I \ < 11 iMISSION HILL ESTATES I 27 \ IVOL. 388-158, PG. 83 11 21 W 22 0 23 0 0 0 26 0 35,077 S.F.— \ I ! 0 30,008 S.F. 6 0 25 P.R.,T.CO. TX. ! 41,717 S.F.: C; 30,002 S.F. N N 24 0 30,003 S.F. \ 1 I ZONED SF-1 "� 30,008 S.F. N 30,008 S.F. c`~v N It NI O I F L TREE — Uf'dE............ 22 \ \ 11 I LUD TREE 4.5 4S. s jl O � 2 - 1.22 AC I 27 5d �� _ LINE*''. $ 28 1 04 O LOW DEN. I 4 _ - 35_B.L. _ - - - - - - oo S.F. �I EO ._ \ II 1 9 61 49' -- — - 76.70' �h 29,435 S. 01 M o I f \ ,s uE 1 136.40' 136.40' 132.78' I I I OI 0� 56.40' 136.40' s� of I V) — — — — I - MALTON LAN— M_A�TON— I r17.32'MALTON 1I wj o 20 77.17' 110.12' 110.12' 110.12' 110.12' 79.77' i�j' I % , - - - - -- - -- - - - - �- - - - - 30,000 S.F. I un 1 rj 35'_9. L. S' U E / I 0 F-� , 0 / I M �20,000 S.F. - M M 12 rr1 10 r � I L -- _ 10_ D. & U E _ 1 200.00' .' � M 13 '~' M 11 r> m _, D �.& U_E - - - `°_ ._ — / W � I 1cJ ,,� 14 ,.� 20,186 S.F. � 20,186 S.F. 21,500 S.F. 1 ,n o - - - - - - - - a - - - -10 D. & u E. l 0 20,186 S.F. °0 20,186 S.F. oo to `D u E.181.27' - 5/8" LR. l 21,500 S.F.F�_ I 1 1 J ml c�v m NI 19 R'"'° d 0 a a Q C C o 'M o; ` I 1 0 m ; .. 1 1 30,000 S.F. o8 1 of 20,009 S.F. 1 1 / M, �h 117.79' 110.12' 110.12' 110.12' 110.12' 117.12' ))) $ r 180.80' 237.55' °D 1 L.' 6 I v / 180.54' $ Im 29.15' I- I 6 200 00' I I N �� 9 I I 18 w 24,570 S.F. J \ �I JI ( W 16 17 N 31 I 0 1 23,574 S.F. rn 20,016 S.F. 01 26,335 S.F. 6I O 1 18 o x ! 0D ,19 g1' \ S� \2,818 S.F. I 00 30,000 S.F. `� 6' \ �sr. I 00 M Y' i s LF 0 o� U 26,961 S.F. '� \ LO �-30' B.� . I O - 8 19.38' 1 10.12' 8 � 21,431 S.F. I 200.00, i 5.34 • r> ----------- —T ----- - OWN BY LANE -- - -- - 1 SURVEY A-687 - -- 20 ,e : —I-- —I-- SOUTHVIEW - PHASE I CAB. 'A', SLIDE #784 P.R.,T.00. TX. ZONED SF-20A LUD MED. DEN. SOUTHVIEW - PHASE II CAB. 'A', SLIDE ##1350 P.R.,T.CO. TX. ZONED SF-20A LUD MED. DEN. N I 188.21 0.00 e � 9.21 17 20,654 S.F. - 7 -- --- - °i 30,006 S.F. N o Nfl 00 -� �R, o , 51. I I I / 13 ,_ - N I _ - 1 I27,553 S.F. n 12 \ \ -- 22,634 S.F. o I 12 1 1 - .i_ -� COIviMON,'AREA � N 10 177. ) 1 �, \ _ 5 _ _/ 58,679 S.F. 00 1 sr 28,475 S.F. _ 165.?g. _ o SIDEWALK _ - _ _ 120.00' S 89'24' 1 T� E 15 J.E. i°' �_� u.E.--- - o _ - `--- 351.75'------ - --- - - - ---- - 131.32 — — — — DIAMOND CIRCLE ESTATES 0.. moo'_ o_� u� _ _ _ VOL. 388-177, PG. 7 0 �I \ 68 \o / E I a MI 133.51' io--D. uE. 117.23' 117.23' 103.78' 117.86' 16 11 '' C'RG. E_Mr. • ...7 ZONED P.R.,T.CO.TX. o � 13 46 o �n u� O cMDj 31,225 S.F. _ o 30 940 S.F. j''•. �n °'. R/ II 1 M 5o' 13.L x 156.63' W I- io O N r\ r^ `.' 14 w� z I" 1 2 3 4 9 5 LUD 8 Z �� 15 �� 27.995 S.F. o ?I LOW DEN, . 26,833 S.F. cP21 ,140 S.F. 01 Q�. 10 u� r910S.F. °�° 20,934 S.F. °r0 21,G03 S.F. 21,075 S.F. o0 ZONED SF ��� I ^I 20' DRG. ESMT. N 21,209 S.F. O N LUD �\ �� �I� - - - - 35' E.L. - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - - -y- - -'- 44 7?' 10 ' MED. DEN. 255.45' L 76_55' _ "'Io W. W. HALL. 1 o:yld'R!Y N , A 1 - — 332.00' 0 33 1 17 2 ! LAND USE DATA r� 13s. 4' 117.24 117.24' 116.64' DRG. ESMT•." V I 189.67' Z 3. ----- --------------------- 7 5' L F - - - 1 363.28 '. ¢ : S 89 10_04' E - -- I 3 - - -- - 71QL0' —CROSS LANE-- - ---- - -- - - -' >S AREA = 48.877 ACRES 42.04' - - - - - z76.os'. D. U E- 87.223� �>, �I ml N - -------------' 1 0 L @ � �'�� NI 0 1 135.84' 117.24' 117.24' 117.24' 116.30' L (TO REMAIN) 1.6 AC. NI --- - -- - _VOL.1205 PG.465 1 MENDEZ L 6 �' cn 23.532 S.F. F .• � 35 B. . - DESIGNATED COMMON AREA)T 1.9 AC. 21.9 AC. 9 �Rs 25,415 S.F.sF0 7 �I i D.R.,T.CO. TX. "ING LIAO TRACT) ! o �9, '1 'OSED CROSS TRACT) 23.7 AC. 0 27,815 S.F. 188.g2 14 0 15 0 16 0 17 0 18 ZONED AG 0 5 ,a B w! Iw o 1 cv 30,395 S.F. 9�A. �l �I� 1 26,019 S.F. 0 21,102 S.F. 0 21,102 S.F. 0 21,102 S.F. 0 20 g24 S.F.01 LUD 48.9 AC. I 1 co, MED. DEN. m7 0N-RESIDENTIAL AREA _ _ — ! a 61 20 28.74 �I �!�, 24,708 S.F. r 1! 8g ,v/ °0 0 0 — 1 � \ 96, -1 e� off. D 0 (� �' 4 0 RESIDENTIAL AREA (C 1) 1 .6 AC. - _ -169-48' - - - _1 t 7.24 _ _ = 1 17.24_ _ _ t 17 24' ,o`D- u.E.�_15 08 _ 3 I 200.00 �. --- ---- --- OF TOTAL AREA EGA T 9 - i 67. i s' 1 E O 99.65' i 1.20' 5' D. & U.E. 147.06' C1 LOTS ' SlZi�i\ 669 ------ �6 28.74' RESIDENTIAL AREA 10 �� a3, N1 3 C, /� �1 1 m 89.32' I 0 10 0 9 0 45.6 AC. 2 o 0 0 20,001 S.F -! c� ENTIAL AREA 15 u E 4 1 0 12 0 11 0 �O 28,662 S.F. O 93.3� \ o OF TOTAL AREA 4p'BL COMMON`' a°��: t3 0 20,016 S.F. 0 20,016 S.F.00 JTIAL UNITS 63 - -_Y =J! 0 32,568 S.F. �� AREA �� 6 �� 25,513 S.F. _ 00 \ � DENTIAL DENSITY 1 .38 UNITS/AC - _ x - i o �h ��� '�9. - 35_ B L 'EAS 218.849 S.F. I `' 33,633 S.F. �� '. 30' B.L. - - - 2 6g.�6 A I (n /IMON AREAS 5 I N ��� 729'26' 55.00' 111.20' 111.20' 35.38' �- ? A• I rT SIZE 25,002 S.F. 20,000 S.F. ! 10' UTILITY & `'�:'' 'os 'C11 3 �T SIZE LANDSCAPE ESMT 27,116 s.F -—GATESHEAD - Im 11 1 29.49' / �9. - --� ZONING/LUD I �............... ! -r , 6s 29' 4s.9o' 11200' 112.oa' 42.87' �, MENDEZ, LTD. I 60 51 ' � / 24,1 17 S.F. N -----1--`-=----� - --- )NING C 1 , 01 , SF20A, AG 290.00' �� / 7 VOL. 465 MEDIUM DENSITY, MIXED USE I _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6S. c'� 272 L 1 .,T. PG -- -�_ 20' BUFFER YARD 'F1' 35' B.L. \ �4. D.R.,T.CO. TX. 3E AG I �L CV o DRG. ESMT. / ZONING SF20A — — — — 1 r1� ' U / v o. .. (POND) •.... M o 5 0 6 ZONED AG C, m� w 0 p 0 LUD 1 1�a �> Q I Z COMMON °i 3 0 4 0 2o,t6o S.F. 20,001 S.F. 7 LUD � o J N /... 0 N 20,160 S.F. ELOPMENT SCHEDULE �� USE I Imp m 1 AREA 20,046 S.F.OD00 Cr 0° 27,879 s.F. MED. DEN. ,�; ZONED C 1 LUD N I t i LUD 1 06 0 START: JANUARY, 1997 N(. USE ° °0I COMPLETION: JULY, 1997 " USE 0 ! 1 M 1 Ui '� 1 10.15' 1 12.00' 1 12.00' 140.71 ' 181.02' �' 1 12 N �`• I 63,709 S.F. 655.89' 1 i 68,406 S.F. 50' B.L. ! ! I C14 COMMON AREA ZONED C-2 — -- - — - - 2 GENERAL NOTES I ! I 233.47' 38,405 S.F.--__-- -----_20• BUFFER YARD�K�=-------_--------_ 20' BUFFER YARD 'o,_290.00'- __ ----J ,., ___----_----- -- - -- - - -- 10' u. . 00 LL UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. -- - - - -- - - -- �. - , OMMON AREAS WILL BE OWNED & — — — — — — 3 47'-656.20�_;__ — iAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. LOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 8439CO185-H REVISED 8-2-95 SHOWS 10 SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS gUNDATED BY 100-YEAR FLOOD. N P.O.B. _ F.M. 1709OOW SOUTHLAKE BLVDA- R.O.W. VARIES TIMARRON ADD'N. PHASE V 3 4 APPROVED FINAL PLAT ZONED PUD --w I nn i un:. MED. DEN 60 . fS7'0 • W m: co: DILG PLACE I VOL. 388L 174, PG. 30 P.R.,T.Co.,TX. ZON D SFA1 12 -A LU( D. DEN. 2 - B BILLY E. FRENCH V. 5682, P. 612 D.R.,T.CO.,TX. ZONED AG LUDO MED. DEN. 3: ce 5RT071tBERM. WRH LANDSCAPING RUCKER FAMILY I BILLY W. HAYES ' HIP V. 5472, P. 69 IT2D1.PARTNER V D D.R.,T.CO.,TX. I I ZONEDAG ZONED AG ....- .� . LUD, MED, DEN , RUCKER FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIP V. 12069, P. 1671 D.R.,T.CO.,TX. ZONED AG LUD: MED. DEN. _ F—THE SOUTHLAKE PARTNERSHIP i V. 7759, P. 1690 D.R.,T.CO.,TX. ZONED C3 LUD; MIXED USE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION All those certain tracts or parcels of land located in the W.W. HALL SURVEY, Abstrct 687, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being all of that certain tract in the name of Homei Liao and Jia Her Hwang, Trustees by deed recorded in Volume 7937, Page 294, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.C.T.) (25.196 ac.) and that certain tract conveyed to Beulah B. Cross by deed recorded in Volume 3989, Page 640, D.R.T.C.T. (22.0 ac.) and being more particularly described by metes and bounds in one tract as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 2 of Diamond Circle Estates, an addi- tion to the city of Southlake as recorded in Volume 388-177, Page 7, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, (P.R.T.C.T.) and the Southwest corner of said Liao & Hwang tract; Thence with a common line to Diamond Circle Estates and said Liao & Hwang tract, North 00 degrees, 09 minutes 00 seconds West passing a common corner of said Diamond Circle Estates and Mission Hill Estates, according to the plat recorded In Volume 388-158, Page 83, P.R.T.C.T. at some 1,494.6 feet and continuing in all 1,763,51 feet to an iron pipe found in the east line of said Mission Hill Estates for the northwest corner of said Liao & Hwang tract and the Southwest corner of Lake Wood Acres Addition - Phase Two, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-1 37, Page 34, P.R.T.C.T.; Thence with a line common to said Lake Wood Acres Addition and said Liao and Hwang tract South 89 degrees 10 minutes 04 seconds East 644,37 feet to an iron pipe found for the common northeast corner of aforesaid Liao & Hwang Tract and the northwest corner of said Cross Tract; Thence with a line common to said Lake Wood Acres Addition and said Cross Tract South 89 degrees 10 minutes 04 seconds East 523.65 feet to an iron pin for the southeast corner of sold Lake Wood Acres Addition and the northeast corner of said Cross Tract, and in the west line of SouthView - Phase I according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 'A', Slide #784, P.R.T.C.T.; Thence with a line common to said SouthView - Phase I and said Cross Tract, South 01 degree 01 minute 47 seconds West 362.05 feet to an iron pin for Southwest corner of said SouthView Phase I and the Northwest corner of SouthView - Phase II according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 'A', Slide #1350, P.R.T.C.T.; Thence with a line common to said SouthView Phase II and said Cross Tract South 01 degree 30 minutes 19 seconds West 509.76 feet to an iron pin for the southwest corner of said SouthView Phase II and an ell corner of said Cross tract', Thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 17 seconds East 131.32 feet to the most easterly northeast corner of said Cross tract and the northwest corner of that 7.75 acre tract conveyed to Jimmy E. Perry by deea recorded in Volume 4343, Page 260, D.R.T.C.T.; Thence with a line common to said Cross and said Perry tract South 00 degrees 59 minutes 02 seconds West, 874.40 feet to the southeast corner of said Cross tract on the north right-of-way line of F.M. Highway No. 1709. Thence with the north right-of-way North 89 degrees 59 minutes 13 seconds West 656.20 feet to the Southwest corner of said Cross Tract and the Southeast corner of said Liao & Huang Tract; Thence with the north right -of --way North 89 degrees 57 minutes 02 secords West 603.47 feet to the place of beginning and containing some 48.9 acres of land. rTTRVF nATA CURVE NO. DELTA RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH 1 48' 45' 42" 277.55' 125.79' 236.21' 2 48' 45' 42" 243.85' 110.52' 207.53' 3 48' 45' 42" 319.28' 144.70' 271.72' 4 48' 45' 42" 285.58' 129.43' 243.04' 5 47 25' 46" 230.00' 123.00' 231.78' 6 90' 35' 13" 173.48' 175.27' 274.28' 7 90' 58' 57" 41.50' 42.22' 65.90' 8 90• 24' 12" 41.50' 41.79' 65.48' 9 90' 38' 25' 193.1 1 ' 195.28' 305.50' 10 48' 27' 55' 200.00' 90.02' 169.18' 11 47 46' 46" 180.00' 79.73' 150.10' Owners: HOMEI I_IAO �.JIA HEFR HWANG, TRUSTEES 2301 McCOY ROAD CARROLLTON, TEXAS, 75006 AND BEULLAH CROSS C/O BEN MUIR 709 MULBERRY ST. FORNEY, TEXAS 75126 Developer: CF1UMBAKEFt E:>EVEL_OPMENT, INC SUITE 234 100 W. SOUTHLAKE BLVD., #320 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 817-329-6996 Engineers/Planners: , J. E. I....EN/I TT ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 726 COMMERCE STREET SUITE 104 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 488-3313 FOXBOROUGH a AKE BLVD. (F.M. 1 LOCATION MAP Original Scale : 1 " = 100' 0 50 100 200 --� --� Graphic Scale in Feet PRELIMINARY PLAT FOXBOROUGH AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE W.W. HALL SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 687 48.877 ACRES 30 DECEMBER 1996 u161Blhw 1 0u CASE NO. ZA96-137 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION fi I I I I -- 1 46 D. Z J- I - - - - & U E_ u a w _j o QIo l t CONCEPT 1.21 AC PLAN ' .r �..,s' UE I I LIMITS `- i --A X" /_ I x\ 21 1 5' UE I I I \ 2.32 AC 1 / \ 1 (MISSION HILL ESTATES ! iloo \ i 1VOL. 388-158, PG. 83 / \ II P.R.,T.CO. TX. l� ZONED SF-1 22 \ i i LUD 1.22 AC \ 1 LOW DEN. I 11 \ 15' UE C� ICI \\��11 I \\ `n - -�- - - -- - - - `' 3C � I � o I o I � i i 1: i I o • o � 1s'.LE o W. W. HALL SURVEY, A-637 ' I; I . u� 7 . CA 31 i I I' I I 3 I CIAMOND CIRCLE ESTATES 0- VOL. 388-177, PG. 7 0 U)I • P.R.,T.00. TX. am rail ZONED SF-1 oo `r- . LUD 8 z 0,. LOW DEN. i. 11 i' 20' DRc. ESMT I LAND USE DATA GROSS AREA = 48.877 ACRES EXISTING C 1 (TO REMAIN) 1 .6 AC. EXISTING 01 (TO REMAIN - DESIGNATED COMMON AREA) 1.9 AC. SF20A (EXISTING LIAO TRACT) 21.7 AC. SF2CA (PROPOSED CROSS TRACT) 23.7 AC. TOTAL LAND 48.9 AC. NON-RESIDENTIAL AREA TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL AREA (C:1) 1 .6 AC. PROPORTION OF TOTAL AREA 3.3% NUMBER OF C1 LOTS 1 RESIDENTIAL AREA TOTAL RESIDENTIAL AREA 45.6 AC. PROPORTION OF TOTAL AREA 93.3% NO. RESIDENTIAL UNITS 63 GROSS RESIDENTIAL DENSITr 1.38 UNITS/'AC. COMMON AREAS 218,849 S.F. NO. OF COMMON AREAS 5 AVERAGE LOT SIZE 25,002 S.F. MINIMUM LOT SIZE 20,000 S.F. ZONING/LUD PRESENT ZONING C1 , 01, SF20A, AG LUD MEDIUM DENSITY, MIXED USE EXISTING USE AG PROPOSED ZONING SF20A DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE START: JANUARY, 1997 COMPLET ON: JULY, 1997 GENERAL NOTES 1 . ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. 2. COMMON AREAS WILL BE OWNED & MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 4 DdOG� I 00 is 9 1' I I; I. I• I 10 I '5 UE I - 11 I• I II� LUD MIX. USE : I' I 12 ,�ZONED C-2 i I I 11 I LOT Q I�------ - 1 O I LAKE WOOD ACRES ADDITION 11 4 AC - - - - - - _ O PHASE II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 ( VOL. 388-137, PG. 34 W P.R.,T.CO. TX. � I E, I �hl11 LAKE WOOD ACRES ADDITION - PHASE II z VOL. 388-137, PG. 34 � ' 4 P.R.,T.CO. TX. --------+ ZONED SF-1 / CONCEPT LUD PLAN LOT 8 4 AC LOW DEN. 7 �4 S 89' 10' 047 E CA A Z-l. 0 IN __ F.M.. 1709 --CONCEPT. (SOUTHLAKE BLVD� PLAN R.O.W. VARIES LIMITS TIMARRON ADD'N. PHASE `✓ APPROVED FINAL PLAT ZONED PUD LUD> MED. DEN 3 20 DRG. ESMT. \ / I I LI 7-1-2 S 89' 10'04" E 10'...JII IL. 523.65' 7.5' U.E. room a" WOWS a.a\ On, a.wv a" Q.1ldvSgi, rr• rr. mi." iri Ti rr. ii.7i•■•••ii��•T•.Ti•�••iu�•i.••-i•�••T�•i••ui. •.-i•••u••i.u•i• 1K.I - - - - - - ' 6.40' 1�6.40'- - - 136.40' - - - - - - 269.81' 10' u.E- i 3 \--� o a 27 m: _m 00: DILG PLACE BILLY E. FRENCH V. 5682, P. 612 VOL. 388`' 174, PG. 30 D.R.,T.00.,TX. P.R.,T.CO.,TX. ZONED AG ZON D SFA1 LUD: MED. DEN. 2 -A LUDO ED. DEN. 2 - B \ P.O.B. 5 R TO 71 BERM b - �- WrrH LAhDSCAPNO I KUUKtK I•AMILT LTD. PARTNERSHIP iV. 12069, P. 16711 1 D.R.,T.CO.,TX. 1 ZONED AG LUD: MED. DEN. :to I I L :o � 2 n I I :N I :1 0 I I f •' I :Iw / • .ID i :Io 10'_ D: & U_E •r5�8" I.R. •1 •I . w 6 i I. I j IO •� . n E-a ;p� -30' B.! I - OWNBY LANE :I :I Li •I:D 12 1 11 •' o s' S 89'24'1 T1 E • 'L - 131.32' _,s o_ & E-� - BILLY W. HAYES I nuLr�trc r/AMILT LTD. PARTNERSHIP V. 5472, P. 69 I V. 12069, P. 1671 D.R.,T.CO.,TX. D.R.,T.CO.,TX. ZONED AG 1 ZONED AG LUD- MED. DEN. LUDO MED. DEN. SOUTHVIEW - PHASE I CAB. 'A', SLIDE #784 P.R.,T.00. TX. ZONED SF-20A LUD MED. DEN. SOUTHVIEW - PHASE II CAB. 'A', SLIDE ##1350 P.R.,T.CO. TX. ZONED SF-20A LUD MED. DEN. SURVEY, A-695 cn MENDEZ, LTD. VOL. 12051, PG. 465 D.R.,T.CO. TX. ZONED AG LUD MED. DEN. MENDEZ, LTD. VOL. 12051, PG. 465 D.R.,T.CO. TX. ZONED AG LUD MED. DEN. CONCEPT P 1 •, LIMITS J THE SOUTHLAKE PARTNERSHIP 1 V. 7759, P. 1690 D.R.,T.CO.,TX. ZONED C3 1 LUD: MIXED USE SF-20A B. CROSS TRACT All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land located in the W.W. HALL SURVEY, Abstract 695, Tarrant County, Texas, being all of that certain tract conveyed to Beualh Cross by deed recorded in Volume 3989, Page 640, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.C.T.) and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at the southeast corner of that certain tract conveyed to Homei Liao and Jia Her Hwang, Trustees by deed recorded in Volume 7937, Page 294 D.R.T.C.T. and the souith- west corner of said Cross tract, the common corner being in the north right-of-way of F.M. Highway 1709. Thence with a common line to said Liao & Hwang tract and said Cross tract North 01 degree 10 minutes 56 seconds East 1,775.03 feet to a point on the south line of Lake Wood Acres Addition - Phase 11 according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-137, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas (P.R.T.C.T.) and the common rortheast corner of said Liao & Hwang tract and northwest corner of said Cross tract; Thence with a line common to said Lake Wood Acres Addition and said Cross Tract South 89 degrees 10 minutes 04 seconds East 523.65 feet to an iron pin for the southeast corner of said Lake Wood Acres Addition and the northeast corner of said Cross Tract, and in the west line of SouthView - Phase I according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 'A', Slide #784, P.R.T.C.T.; Thence with a line common to said SouthView - Phase I and said Cross Tract, South 01 degree 01 minute 47 seconds West 362.05 feet to an iron pin for Southwest corner of said SouthView Phase I and the Northwest corner of SouthView - Phase If according to the plat recorded in Cabinet 'A', Slide # 1 350, P.R.T.C. T .; Thence with a line common to said SouthView Phase II and said Cross Tract South 01 degree 30 minutes 19 seconds West 509.76 feet to an iron pin for the southwest corner of said SouthView Phase II and an ell corner of said Cross tract; Thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 17 seconds East 131.32 feet to the most easterly northeast corner of said Cross tract and the northwest corner of that 7.75 acre tract conveyed to Jimmy E. Perry by deed recorded in Volume 4343, Page 260, D.R.T.C.T., Thence with a line common to said Cross and said Perry tract South 00 degrees 59 minutes 02 seconds West, 874.40 feet to the southeast corner of said Cross tact on the north right-of-way line of F.M. Highway No. 1709. Thence with the north right -of --way North 89 degrees 59 minutes '3 seconds West 656.20 feet tc the Point of Beginning and containing some 23.7 acres of land. CURVE DATA CURVE N0. DELTA RADIUS ITANGENT LENGTH 1 48' 45' 4 2 " 277.55' 125.79' 236.21 ' 2 48' 45' 42" 243.85' 1113.52' 207.53' 3 48' 45' 42" 319.28' 144.70' 271.72' 4 48' 45' 42" 285.58' 129.43' 243.04' 5 47' 25' 46" 280.00' 123.00' 231.78' 6 90' 35' 13" 173.48' 1 75.27' 274 28' 7 90' 58' 57" 41.50' 42.22' 65.90' 8 90' 24' 12" 41.50' 41.79' 65.48' 9 90' 38' 25" 193.1 1 ' 195.28' 305.50' 10 48' 27' 55" 200.00' 90.02' 1 E9. 18' 11 47' 46' 46" 180.00' 79.73' 150.10' Owners: HOMEI LIAO ,..JIA HER HWANG, TRUSTEES 2301 McCOY ROAD CARROLLTON, TEXAS, 75006 AND BEULAH CROSS C/O BEN MUIR 709 MULBERRY ST. FORNEY, TEXAS 75126 Developer: CRUMBAKER DEVELOPMENT, INC SUITE 234 100 W. SOUTHLAKE BLVD., #320 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 817-329-6996 Engineers/Planners: .J. E. LEVI TT EN©I NEERS, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 726 COMMERCE STREET SUITE 104 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 488-3313 LOCATION MAP Original Scale : 1 " = 100' 0 50 100 tot) Graphic Scale in Feet CONCEPT PLAN FOXBOROUGH AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE W.W. HALL SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 687 48.877' ACRES 30 DECEMBER 1996 CASE NO. ZA96-136