The URL can be used to link to this page

1997-03-04 CC Packet City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ronald J. Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: CIP Status Report Background Attached is the status report of the projects currently included in the City's Capital Improvement Program for 1996-1998. Included are detailed schedules for the: 1996-1997 Roadway CIP Projects 1997-1998 Road and Drainage CIP Projects 1996-1998 Water and Sewer CIP Projects The following projects have not had detailed schedules developed,but will be included in the April Project tatus Report: 1. Projects involved with recently approved Neighborhood Sewer Program 2. 'Projects involved with Ground Storage Tank No. 2 3. Several small water and sewer projects currently under design 4. Johnson Road water and sewer(97/98 project) 5. ' Dove Estates Lift Station 6. Projects complete or under construction(separate status.report;on these The projects that have been completed or are currently under construction are shown on the CURRENT PROJECT STATUS SHEET. The detailed project schedules have been prepared using Microsoft Project Software. This software will allow City Council and Staff to track each project on a regular basis. Beginning in the April report, separate rows will be shown for"schedule time"versus "actual time". If any Council member wishes to see any additional work items, they need to contact me prior to finalizing the baseline for each project. Addition of extra tasks is difficult once the projects have had baselines established. If there are special projects for which speci c tracking schedules are required,these requests should be made to Engineering Staff. 1 Attachments D:\W P-FILES\CIP\96.97 STATUS.MEM 4B.1-1 • 1996 - 1997 RoadCIP Projects •• 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration Sep . Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul 1 Dove(Shady /to 262d Creek) 2 Design 65d 3 Review Plans 21d —041 4 Obtain Right of Way Od 5 Finalize Plans 10d 6 Advertise 28d 7 Council Bid Award 1 d 4119 8 Obtain Contract Documei 15d 9 Preconstruction Conferer 1 d /3 10 Construction 90d 11 Fp 12 Hi hland(Shady-WC 352d ,!;��, �, 0r;,,,,,'�:u::r!Iu,;,m a;,.�a;�ni '.I^gyp. ,;;:;I!�:,,.;qp;l,:r,�: .;,.:, - ,,,. 9 ) :i. LI: L,.�I.. :I .III�•L.:,I I. I a�.l " 13 Design 65d l;Ilrr;i!1 il,ljll(I IE';I!,ri u,N;!;4 ip l 14 Review Plans 21d —40111 15 Obtain Right of Way 60d �!�lid oihjg;.pk sriilii 16 Finalize Plans 10d " 17 Advertise 28d • 11112ili,,,;: 18 Council Bid Award 1 d r 4.1 19 19 Obtain Contract Documei 15d 20 Preconstruction Conferer 1 d /3 21 Construction 180d 22 - Page 1 • 1996 - 1997 Roadw y CIP Projects III 1997 1998 ' ID Task Name Duration Sep Nov Jan d Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul 23 Street Rehab-Timarron eta 304d u`:II: ,.I,i,: 24 Design 93d t;; ;u; ;.:l;kil;L 25 Review Plans 10d 26 Obtain Right of Way Od 27 Finalize Plans 10d .i( 28 Advertise 28d �- , },.4h0;111 29 Council Bid Award 1 d 11 30 Obtain Contract Documer 15d 31 Preconstruction Conferer 1 d 123 ' 32 Construction 120d :,: 33 co 34 Rldgecrest Road 219d III fLIII =p;r,;;r;r;in:::;a a, ;;Ti !I(� 9 'i�ILJIIIII�i(IIIIIi�I�i::Ij�:�h J:'' il!F,.,- [ER�ili< <>i:.1 l i :$ .:.r W 35 Design eod ;l ,1l l;;;:t:.,.:,:._.:,,_;":::;'j7 36 Review Plans 21d 37 Obtain Right of Way Od 38 Finalize Plans 10d 39 Advertise 21d ;I!i!I, .L..l.lh 40 Council Bid Award 1 d 18 41 Obtain Contract Documet 15d 42 Preconstruction Conferer 1 d /30 43 Construction 90d •-. IL►I 44 Page 2 1996 - 1997 Roa CIP Projects 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar I May Jul 45 Continental Blvd 339d 46 Design 90d r ` 47 Review Plans 21d 46417 48 Obtain Right of Way 21d �� 49 Finalize Plans 10d 60 Advertise 21d 51 Council Bid Award 1 d 0124 52 Obtain Contract Documet 15d L 63 Preconstruction Conferer 1 d 1117 54 Construction 180dco Page 3 _ • • 1997 1998 Road and lnage CIP Projects 1997 1998 ID Task Name Feb I Mar Apr May_ Jun Jul I Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec to Lonesome D, ',,, ;;;,,,;,;,,�,m:' ,::;.x,;: 1 Burney(Carroll L n ,,.: :,;:. :�... i, .,I FxNg .i.:x I. ! .,Ir.i.'si;ti .��z�`?�'il.. 2 Design 3 Review Plans 4 Obtain Right of Way 5 Finalize Plans 6 Advertise ; itJia :r: �ilJ�ii��i�4h 7 Council Bid Award 0/17 8 Obtain Contract Documents 9 Preconstructlon Conference 1110 10 Construction 11 w 12 Love Henry Court 13 Design :ux,;;,,i.;. 14 Review Plans 41/11-1 15 Obtain Right of Way 16 Finalize Plans 17 Advertise Jl�� i!I;;Ii' 18 Council Bid Award 41126 19 Obtain Contract Documents 20 Preconstruction Conference •0/20 21 Construction 22 • Page 1 - •19971998 Road and Inage CIP Projects 1997 1998 ID Task Name Feb Mar Apr I May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 23 Lake Drive 24 Design 25 Review Plans LOW 26 Obtain Right of Way 27 Finalize Plans • 28 Advertise 29 Council Bid Award0117 30 Obtain Contract Documents 31 Preconstruction Conference 4.11110 32 Construction 33 34 Lliac!Pine410111n1Ink"@!I!'!"II!:.Ii;p!,'.t g!!;r4!ICIGI'' u;rr;c; °' 35 Design :!:a:.,,:•:, ::;:a<:m;u,:: :s!n:::;: 36 Review Plans k •:a^ 37 Obtain Right of Way • 38 Finalize Plans 39 Advertise 40 Council Bid Award . 218 41 Obtain Contract Documents 42 Preconstruction Conference 2/30 43 Construction • 44 Page 2 • 1997 - 1998 Road andna a Projects • g CIP � 1997 1998 ID Task Name Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 45 Chapel Downs-Channel ,; x!!le 46 Design 47 Review Plans 48 Obtain Right of Way 49 Finalize Plans IN 50 Advertise x.:;!i1'0:.!I!L I�i�N!N!�u�i�I��I.F! I 51 Council Bid Award 1+410/10 52 Obtain Contract Documents 53 Preconstruction Conference 1/3 54 Construction 55 �' 56 Mission Hills-Channel n5il. 57 Design 1iP,1 ;1<N !u!!w!'0!0`1 68 Review Plans 59 Obtain Right of Way a@!!!!:O;;i:Fh 60 Finalize Plans 61 Advertise -41 �� .I L 62 Council Bid Award t0/10 63 Obtain Contract Documents }-, 64 Preconstruction Conference 113 65 Construction 66 Page 3 1997 - 1998 Road Projects an ina a CIP Pro 9 1997 1998 ID Task Name Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan i Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Continental 67Park-Channel !':i 68 Design 69 Review Plans 417 70 Obtain Right of Way 71 Finalize Plans 72 Advertise 73 Council Bid Award 41/6 • 74 Obtain Contract Documents 75 Preconstruction Conference 41/2 76 Construction Page 4 • - 19961998 Water/ter CIP Projects 4110 1997 1998 ID Task Name S O N D J F ) M I A M J J A SONDJFMAMJ J ASO 1 Shady Lane Water/Sewer/Roads r;> 2 Design 3 Review Plans 4 Obtain Right of Way 5 Finalize Plans .Dl� 6 Advertise 7 Council Bid Award 0/9 8 Obtain Contract Documents 1+1 H 9 Preconstruction Conference 0131 10 Construction �} 11 w 12 Huntwlck Sewer ;,, 13 Design 14 Review Plans 15 Obtain Right of Way 16 Finalize Plans 17 Advertise ESEI 18 Council Bid Award ,,121 19 Obtain Contract Documents —� 20 Preconstruction Conference 41/13 21 Construction a 22 Page 1 • 1996 - Water/ter1998 CIP Projects 1101997 1998 ID Task Name SONDJFMAINIJIJIA SONDJFMAMJ J AISO 23 Diamond SewerlRoads 24 Design 25 Review Plans :Any �i�+,Yei�:. 26 Obtain Right of Way N 27 Finalize Plans p 28 Advertise • 29 Council Bid Award I30 30 Obtain Contract Documents 111111 31 Preconstruction Conference /23 32 Construction 1-01 33 34 Mission Hills Sewer ,,;ur • 0 35 Design 36 Review Plans y.V«€ 37 Obtain Right of Way �� 38 Finalize Plans 39 Advertise 40 Council Bid Award 41125 41 Obtain Contract Documents 1+1 17 42 Preconstruction Conference I18 43 Construction 44 Page 2 ® • 1996 - 1998 Water er CIP Projects 1997 1998 ID Task Name SONDJFMAMJ J A SONDJFMAMJ J ALSO 45 Dove Road Sewer 46 Design 47 Review Plans 48 Obtain Right of Way 49 Finalize Plans 50 Advertise `i • > 51 Council Bid Award 12 52 Obtain Contract Documents 41 Hi 53 Preconstruction Conference 124 54 Construction 55 P3 56 Dove to Kirkwood Water " 57 Design 58 Review Plans 59 Obtain Right of Way 60 Finalize Plans 61 Advertise 62 Council Bid Award 128 63 Obtain Contract Documents 64 Preconstruction Conference 119 65 Construction 66 Page 3 ® ' 1996 - 1998 Water er CIP Projects 1997 1998 ID Task Name S 0 NDJ F ) M A M JLJ A S O F N D J F M A M J J 67 Continental/Kimball Water A S f O 68 Design h 69 Review Plans 70 Obtain Right of Way \ 71 Finalize Plans 72 Advertise ..,.,:,,.,, 73 Council Bid Award I11112 74 Obtain Contract Documents 75 Preconstruction Conference 214 76 Construction 4.1 W N Page 4 • CURRENT PROJECT STATUS SHEET February 27, 1997 PROJECT DESIGN REVIEW ROW FINALIZE ADVERTISE CONSTRUCTION Sealcoat Roads Complete Public Works Facility Continuous GS#1 -Tank Done Done N/A Done Done Completion 7/97 GS#1 -Pump Station Done Done N/A Done Done Completion 7/97 GS#1 -Utilities Done Done N/A Done Done Completion 7/97 GS#1 -Landscaping Completion 11/97 Hilltop Water Done Done N/A Done Done Complete Hilltop Roads Done Done N/A Done Done Completion 4/97 D:\W PDOCS\CIP\STATUS2.W PD • • 4B.1-13 . 'i CommunityDevelopment Department - duled Priorities as of February27, 1997 • !- • P P ...t�et". :::::::>:::::I: ;:: :::<:::::::»::>:::::>::>:::::::::;:>::::::::::::>::::::>:::;::::»<»::>:>:::::::<:»>:<:>::>::>::>:<:;i;;<:»::::»>:<:>:::«:::>::»::»>::::>::;::::>::>::<:»::>:::;;;;;;;;;<::<:;;: ;;;;::::;;;;;;:»::::::::::<>::<»>:<»>»:;::::> ::::>: <:::::::>:>:;>:: »::: .............. ::::::_:::;:;:<:::;::;::::;:>::::;:::::::>:<:::>::::;>::: >:: ::>::>: ::;: ::;:;iiii:>:::::::::::>::;::>::»::iiii. . ........ ::::><:;;l ::>::;::::::;::::;:::;;::::;::;::;:::::<::::<: `uv:;:<::feu::::;:Janl.....Feb::>;:: ar::>:A r::>;: May 13'ln:....Jut.: .Au <: Se Oct::: 1 CD 1.00 Master Thoroughfare Plan Update Appr. PZ=CC Rev. W'S=PZ=VVSCC 15 P/CD 2.00 Subdivision Ordinance-Park Dedication Provisions Appr. `- PB PZ-'—CC Rev. pB=WSPB=PB=PZ=CC=CC CD. N!A ZoningOrd 4804Y(Assist04 Cars.Facjlities) Appr! , Rev: .......... ._ . . w.__., P =P PZ 7.-G=C0 i 13 CD 1.83 Zoning Ordinance-Outside Storage&Display Appr. PZ-=—CC-CC Rev. PZ=PZ-4CC=CG1 18 CD 2.17 Zoning Ordinance-Impervious Coverage Appr. PZ CC— , Rev. PZPZ=CC$ 14 CD 2.00 Amortization of Certain Nonconforming Uses Appr. WS . ZBA W=Work Session with CC&ZBA Rev.' WS LBA '\ 19 CD 2.33 Tree Preservation Ordinance Revisions Appr. —Pt CC � Rev. =PZ 'CC 1 17 CD 2.00 Lighting Standards Appr. — =`-PZ CC Rev. ;PZ=PZ=CC=CO N. 20 CD 2.40 Ordinance 480-V(Miscellaneous Revisions) Appr. —PZ=CC=-•--- Rev. =PZ=c'C= 2 CD 1.00 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update Appr. PZ—PZ—P7,—PZr=SP:===.PZ:==CC= Rev. PZ—PZ^PZ^PZ SP=PZ=WS=CC 33 CD 3.50 Zoning Ord 480-? (Yard and Frontage Issues) Appr. —�Z CC= Rev. ---PZ—=CC= 25 CD 2.50 Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance Appr. �CC-4-- Rev. —CC 27 CD 2.67 Subdivision Ord Revision-Thoroughfare References Appr. PZ=CC Rev. PZ F LEGEND:(=)=Staff,CC=City Council meeting,PZ=Planning and Zoning Commission meeting,PB=Park Board,SP=SPIN meeting,ZBA=Zoning Board of Adjustment,WS=Work Session Bolded Redline=Projects Added,by CityStinncil since the Iast Council rating and normal approval on Deeetnber 3 i t996 File=L:1WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITYISCHEDULE\O2-27-97.WPD Page I of 2 ilowin m. ........................................................................................................................ ........... ..�`�`�'4� U... .,4 t'i. ...�...��i1�t.GCS::::.:::::::.:�::::::::::::::.::::::.:::::::::::::::.: :.:.:::;:::.::::;:.;;;:.;:.;:::::.:.;:.;:.;:.: 3 CD N/A Zoning Ord 480-X(Revisions to PUD density calculations) Approved by Council on February 4, 1997 7 CD 1.67 Zoning Ord 480-W(Telecommunication Towers&Antennas) Approved by Council on February 4, 1997 v S1�.f�•:�it'�f LtC1�.:��. � f11t`�?E� ::: ::fl:.:'�lllt i! kRef Requested By ITEM Comments Gary Fawks Pitched Roof Revisions to Corridor Overlay Regulations N Council Rezoning-"C-1"to"0-1"(Foxborough) Offered by David McMahan Gary Fawks City Initiated Rezoning of Selected Tracts Staff GLBW Revisions to Sign Ordinance Measurement Methods Our sign ordinance measurement methods are encouraging ugly signs and do not allow developers to add ornamentation to the support structure without it counting against their permitted sign size. • LEGEND:(=)=Staff,CC=City Council meeting,PZ=Planning and Zoning Commission meeting,PB=Park Board,SP=SPIN meeting,ZBA=Zoning Board of Adjustment,WS=Work Session Bolded Redline=Projects Added by City Council since the Iast.Council rating and formal approval on December,3,,1996 File=L:\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\SCIJEDULE\02-27-97.WPD Page 2 of 2 41, . 1_ I. GENERAL FUND ,1 Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended January 31, 1997 with Comparative Actual amounts for the period ended January 31, 1996 - (fiscal month 4-33.33%) Percen Actual Percent Month Budget Monthl Year to Date 1996/97 Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES 1/31/97 1/31/97 . '.• . 1996/97 Reg t Eapendet. 1/31/96 9/30/96 F. tided Ad Valorem Taxes $1,923,621 $1,081,064 $842,557 $2,495,657 $3,357,212 74.3% $2,048,439 $2,939,869 69.7% Sales Tax 115,084 129,977 (14,893 412,343 1,846,000 22.3% 344,580 1,476,709 23.3% Franchise Fees 151,432 211,123 (59,691 654,736 636,397 102.9% 411,274 509,631 80.7% Fines 35,725 25,925 9,800 129,677 353,600 36.7% 138,094 424,341 32.5% Charges for Services 8,409 20,082 (11,673 77,997 279,850 27.9% 45,406 221,003 20.5% . Permits/Fees 183,351 176,687 6,664 690,966 2,249,310 30.7% 632,388 2,642,353 23.9% Miscellaneous 12,714 8,509 4,205 35,988 105,179 34.2% 19,177 115,859 16.6% Interest Income 34.519 4.537 29.982 59.942 143,000 41.9% 22,468 144,286 15.6% Total Revenues $2,464,855 $1,657,903 $806,952 $4,557,306 $8,970,548 50.8% $3,661,826 $8,474,051 43.2% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $21,066 $24,159 $3,093 $91,157 $263,253 34.6% $70,852 $255,958 27.7% Human Resources 6,815 8,001 1,186 29,184 - 96,010 30.4% 0 0 0.0% City Manager 48,034 39,184 (8,850 149,979 446,302 33.6% 121,648 432,525 28.1% Economic Development 4,312 9,260 4,948 21,207 114,882 18.5% 28,729 110,511 26.0% Support Services 100.497 72,389 (28 a: 433.199 1,045.160 41.4% 333.287 981,311 34.0% subtotal-General Govt.Dept. IRO 724 152 991 724 775 1 965 607 36.9% 554 5161 1 780 105 31.1% Finance 43,076 24,069 (19,007 149,142 381,591 39.1% 108,019 390,656 27.7% Municipal Court 19,238 31,3'7,6 12,138 65,747 272,026 24.2% 64,765 206,802 31.3% c Municipal Court-Teen Court 4.866 4,351 (516 14.641 52.206 28.0% 9.575 38.212 25.1% 1 subtotal-Finance Dept. (.$Q 59126 /79 510 705 R71. 32.5% JR2 359 635 67Q 28.7% \ Fire 111,772 117,899 6,127 354,360 1,342,264 26.4% 253,069 902,281 28.0% Police 225,273 194,715 (30,558 678,732 2,147,850 31.6% 414,510 1,389,411 29.8% Public Safety Support 129.376 109,151 I 322.002 935.952 34.4% subtotal-Public Safety Dept. 466 421 421 765 • , • 1 355 094 9 .5Q, 826,1 126 702 7 29.9%% 4.425.4b5 30.6% 91772 29.3% Building 66,543 46,546 (19,997 169,565 453,604 37.4% 111,062 351,228 31.6% Streets/Drainage 57,756 56,184 (1,572 204,756 896,918 22.8% 204,088 878,433 23.2% Public Works Administration 79,646 71.052 '• 223.222 723.488 30.9% 102.911 352,943 29.2% subtotal-Public Works Dept. 2Q3 945 17R 787 • 597 541 2 074 01Q 28.8% 41R 061 1 5R2 604 26.4% Parks and Recreation Dept. 116 515 60.492 '157 157 952.77Q 27.0% 137.19R 623 974 22.0% Community Development Dept. 53 3R5 41 529 : . 158 957 507 157 31.3% 100 177 417 494 24.0% Total Expenditures $1 ORR 17Q $915 RS$ . $1 171 007 $10 631 433 31.3% $7 109 R11 $8 166 749 28.3% Excess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenditures $1,376,685 $742,045 $1,234,299 ($1,660,885) $1,352,013 $307,302 . OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND(USES1 Proceeds from C.O.Sale(net) $0 0 $0 $920,000 $0 $88,107 Transfer In-Other Funds 0 0 0 633,000 0 598,037 Transfer to Infrastructure Q a a a (276.576) (377,2781 Total Other Sources/(Uses) • $0 $0 $0 $1,553,000 Excess(deficiency)of ($276,570) $308,866 Revenues/other sources over Exp. $1 376 685 .1747 045 $1.234-299 ($107.8R51 $1 075 441 $616J.611 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $2,305,462 $2,305,462 $1,689,294 $1,689,294 Reserved for encumbrances • $0 $0 $0 - ENDING FUND BALANCE R3 519 761 R7 197 577 $2 764 717 R7 105 467 • 02/19/97 1 JAN97.WK4 . iip . WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE ' Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended January 31, 1997 and January 31, 1996 (fiscal month 4-33.33%) 02/19/97 Percen Actual Percent Month Budget Month! Year to Date 1996-97 Collected Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES 1/31/97 1/31/97 • , : 1996-97 Budget . i s , 1/31/96 9/30/96 Expanded Water Sales-residential $262,503 $149,642 $112,861 $1,113,653 $4,250,000 26.2% $1,093,743 $4,379,575 25.0% Water Sales-commercial 47,378 24,035 23,343 191,753 475,000 40.4% 156,704 576,519 27.2% Sewer Sales 65,133 39,464 25,669 252,785 590,000 42.8% 203,431 680,936 29.9% Sanitation Sales 42,189 41,198 991 169,252 508,000 33.3% 145,463 448,336 32.4% • Other utility charges 27,668 29,775 (2,107 125,919 359,000 35.1% 113,440 439,275 25.8% Miscellaneous 3,462 7,414 (3,952 25,492 85,900 29.7% 43,198 168,453 25.6% Interest Income 14.143 2.413. 11.734 33.177 68.750 48.3% 29-440 102.729 28.7% Total Revenues $462,476 $293,941 $168,535 $1,912,031 $6,336,650 30.2% $1,785,419 $6,795,823 26.3% EXPENSES • . Water $320,588 190,977 ($129,611 $1,044,561 $3,856,197 27.1% $807,100 $3,539,021 22.8% Sewer 115,962 485,494 369,532 257,306 , 744,873 34.5% 691,049 533,178 129.6% Sanitation 35,967 39,106 3,139 106,717 483,000 22.1% 94,899 393,855 24.1% Debt Service- -. Revenue Bonds R5 32j 120,671 35.346 520.794 1-448.04R 36.0% 62.689 1,835,341 3.4% � Total Expenses $557,842 $836,247 $278,405 $1,929,378 $6,532,118 29.5% $1,655,737 $6,301,395 26.3%�1 Excess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenses ($94 3661 ($542 3061 /$17 3471 ($195 4681 $122.02 $424.4211 OTHER FINANCING $584,773 • SOURCES AND(USES1 Transfer In-Other Funds $58,181 $58,181 $232,723 $698,170 $91,970 $367,879 Transfer Out-Other Funds Q (52.7501 Q (633-0001 (239,2621 (1.555,5561 ' Total Other Sources/(Uses) $58,181 $5,431 $232,723 $65,170 ($147,292) ($1,187,677) Excess(deficiency)of Revenues and other sources over Expenses (517 1851 $215_376 ($130 2981 /$17 610) (S693 2491 • • 02/19/97 2 JAN97.WK4 • ora .: City of Southlake,Texas Inventory Holdings Report 12/31/96 PQOLEDSASH ' Settle Security Purchase Purchase Purchase Current Market Current Gain/ Beginning Beginning Date CUSP_ IyRe Ear Coupon Maturity Price Yield Principal Book Price Market (Loss) Book Market 12/31/96 Open TexPool 2,763,027 5.33990% 1/18/97100.00000 5.33990% 2,763,027 2,763,027 100.00000 2,763,027 0 3,420,789 3,420,789 3/29/96 912827N73 Treas Note 1,000,000 4.75000% 2/15/97 99.35156 5.50700% 993,516 999,097 99.89063 998,906 (191) 995,383 994,219 9/12/96 313385CY0 FHLB 520,000 5.47000% 3/12/97 97.24981 5.70300% 505,699 514,359 98.94092 514,493 134 507,129 507,569 7/19/96 31364A6X5 FNMA 2,920,000 7.68000% 1/27/97101.00700 5.69100% 2,949,404 2,924,067 100.09375 2,922,738 (1,329) 2,938,299 2,942,356 10/21/96 313385EL6 FHLB 1,060,000 5.23000% 4/17/97 97.41406 5.44300% . 1,032,589 1,043,491 98.42472 1,043,302 (189) 0 0 11/13/96 313385HF6 FHLB 545,000 5.20000% 6/23/97 96.79333 5.42100% 527,524 531,337 97.45767 531,144 (193) 0 0 12/16/96 313397FF3 FMC 1,072,000 5.26500% 5/6/97 98.08413 5.44200% 1,051,462 1,052,234 98.15900 1,052,264 30 0 0 12/31/96 02574 CD 3,000,000 5.68000% 1/31/97100.00000 5.83000% 3,000,000 3,000,000 100.00000 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total 12,880,027 5.58170% 12,823,221 12,827,612 12,825,874 (1,738) 10,861,600 10,864,933 Weighted Average Maturity 120 days SP_DC_E09LED CASH Settle Security Purchase Purchase Purchase Current Market Current Gain/ Beginning Beginning Date CUSIP Iyp@ Par Coupon Maturity Pike Yield Principal Book Eric& Markel (Loss) Book Market 12/31/96 Open TexPool 1,291,538 5.33990% 1/18/97100.00000 5.33990% 1,291,538 1,291,538 100.00000 1,291,538 0 779,630 779,630 Ij Total 1,291,538 5.33990% 1,291,538 1,291,538 - 1,291,538 0 779,630 779,630 Weighted Average Maturity 18 days Portfolio Summary Report This report is in compliance with the strategies Pooled Investment Funds approved in the amended City of Southlake Quarter ending 12/31/96 Investment Policy and the Public Funds Investment Act. TotalPortfolio Composition Texpool 29% P_OOLED CASH - SP_DC_P_OOLED_CASH • Treasuries 7% Weighted Weighted Agencies 43% Average Average /1 462.i.e �' 1/ Q7CD's 21% Book Market Days to Book Market Days to (�(/►v►� OG�-I / 100% Value Value Maturity Value Value Maturity Finance Director Date Beginning Balance - 13,444,905 13,437,635 114 days 779,630 -77.9,630 9 days TexPool DepositsNVithdrawals(Net) (669,999) (669,999) 511,908 511,908imavuos Investment Transactions(Par-Net) 88,000 88,000 0 . 0 ChierA ountantiBudget icer ate Changes in Values 35,294 29,762 0 0 Ending Balance 12,827,612 12,825,874 120 days 1,291,538 1,29.1,538 18 days 02/21/97 I N VQ 1296.W K4 " - 1 City of Southlake T Request to Attend Seminar , 0 iii • o by a Councilmember • I If you wish to attend a seminar, either local or out-of-town, please complete this form and submitt to Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary at least 15 days prior to the event. Your request will be processed as soon as possible in accordance with the City of Southlake Travel Policy. Note: Upon returning from a seminar, Councilmembers will give a written or oral report during the "Mayor's Report" section of the next regular council meeting. A Seminar Evaluation form must also be turned in within 5 days of your return from the seminar. Date(s) of Seminar: 21, /19 7atbra-A, 4f7 . , eitiApimi 4 Location of Seminar: id_44,t_ Ill ,. (City, State)i , Type of Seminar: i4�-U. Request from: rd,..,/,,t,A,,,,11,,, (your name and phone number) Will you require Airline Reservations:, Rental Car ✓ Hotel Y Seminar Registration If you have any questions, please contact Sandy LeGrand at(817) 481-5581, ext. 704. For Office Use Only • Date request submitted: !a, /19, Cl Copied to Mayor/Councilmembers C:\WPFILES\CITYSEC\SEMINAR.FRM w- I 1997 Annual Convention Registration Form For International Delegates: SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA sister call SCI for a separate July 29 -August 2Trt,,, cities registration form INTERNATIONAL • Come early! Stay late! San Diego: America's greatest vacation city! Please print or type all information. Fee free to copy this firm for additional registrations. Please direct all completed forms to SCI. Arrival !Departure Airline Dare Time Airline Date Time Last Name • ,'\. \; _•2-. First Name •�--\�Y,. Middle Initial ' - Name to appear on the badge C.\_�,:.� 't y -.\; \ 1`.. :\_' '`' ?' .,\. .� I `.\\;\ _AS- Company/Affiliation _\-`, " T.•� _ 0 mil'.- E. \S._\-', Position: 0 Mayor 0 City Official 0 President/Exec. Director 0 Volunteer Other ''i•.' -2\?. `k. n'+••.cA.•1 i Address (.; ,-9 \- cr-\\'^.:,t_\__ \ — - ostao City C(-1 )-1\\�,� State/Province l'( p ZIPl+c4der I !c C r,17\ Country \ ) V� Telephone \• i ! 1'C% \ -�;''7 ( fl `24 Fax Language(s)spoken I can volunteer: SCI Membership/Affiliations Services Desk ❑Translating/Interpreting CONFERENCE FEES PRE-CONFERENCE FORUM PAYMENT All conference events will require tickets Additional fee required Total amount due$ * for admission. Tickets will be included in Iclyu d3 ):;Amrme mouast eral transs tlioncn hieno E nbarg ❑Check/Money Order your registrationpacket Japanese,and Spanish only Make payable to: Sister Cities S sand materials, exhibits Include: Cl$80 Pacific Run Fontm" ' .International All workshops Bird"(expires 1/31/97) ❑Visa D MasterCard International Delegates Reception, ❑$95 Pacific Rim Forum"Advance" Mayor'Welcoming Reception and (es.ires 6/27/97) 0 American Express Parade ofNations, Tijuana,Mexico OPTIONAL SOCIAL EVENTS Card number Cultural Exploration and Dinner,San FOR FRIENDS AND FAMILY Expiration date Diego-Yokohama Friendship Luncheon, the 1998 Miami Reception,Farewell `l social event(will sequin individual tickets for Dinner, and the All N on Airwaysadmission and must be prepaid No refunds. - Awards CeremonytppTUESDAY,JuLY 29 Authorized signature O $30 InsrmasionalDekgatesReception *All fees must be in U.S.dollars Please check the appropriate box(es) WEDNESDAY,Jun'30 CI$355 U.S.Member"Early Bird" $30 Mayor GoldingsWekoming SPECIAL DIETARY NEEDS (expires 1/31/97) Reception and Parade ofNations THURSDAY,JuLY 31 Ca Diabetic ID Kosher 14,$380 U.S. Member"Advance" ❑Lowsalt ❑V ailanN (expires 6/27/97) $30 Tijuana,Mexico Cultural .. egan ❑$395 U.S. Member"On-site" Exploration and Dinner ❑Other: (7/29/97-8/2/97) (includes round-trip bus ❑$370 U.S.Non-Member"Early transportation, tour ofcultural Mail or Fax to: center,and dinner) Bird" (expires 1/31/97) Sister Cities international 0$395 U.S.Non-Member"Advance" FRIDAY,AUGUST 1 ❑$30 San Diego-Yokohama 120 South Payne Street (expires 6/27/97) Friendship Luncheon Alexandria,VA 22314 ❑$410 U.S.Non-Member"On-site" SATURDAY,AUGUST 2 Telephone: 703/ 836-3535 (7/29/97-8/2197) ` $30 Farewell Dinner and All Fax: 703/ 836-4815 SU$220 Youth Nippon Airways Awards ❑$295 Ambassador Association Ceremony Your registration form must be postmarked by June 27, 1997. After this date,register on-site.See back for registration policies. • 1997 Annual Convention• • HOUSING APPLICATION FORM sister 0 11% . ft; San Diego, California cities July 29 -August 2 INTERNATIONAL Please print or type all information. Feel free to copy this form for additional registrations. All Conference del- egates must complete As it may result in duplicate reservation,do not both mail and fax this form. this official housing Call hotel for reservations today at 619/ 291-7131 application to receive SCI special rates ARRIVAL, DEPARTURE Airliata- -,_. Date . . .... Time Airline Date Time _ Delegate status: 114 Adult l] Youth Last Name \X\_\..R Fast Name \V'1-'l`(\`ELti'c Middle Initial �( Company/Affiliation Q` \5\-' '`(1'11"c-\ �0 �`t'�`N\ c \--(`>> C� c 55\%� \ �S=— ) \ Address — '\E- \c)L \ \. , CN k-\bi \ V - portal code City C11)--‘.\- \-8c `Z. State/Province —Tx ZIP+4 6-14•O -), Country WS cek— Telephone, 9`'1)y L,`-S S X '1 0 Fax • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • --411 YPE-OrficCCOMMODATIONS.(please-cheek,roonvtype)---. Garden Section Tower Section All hotel reservations must be directed to: Adult Youth Adult Youth Single $89 $79 $99 $89 Town & Country Hotel 500 Hotel Circle North ❑Double $99 $89 $109 $99 San Diego,CA 92108 ❑Double/Double $99 $89 $109 $99 Phone: 619/ 291-7131 ❑Triple $109 $99 $119 $109 Fax: 619/ 291-3584 U Quad $119 $109 $129 $119 Please check if you require special accommodations: ❑Handicapped Access 0 Smoking Non-Smoking • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • •• •• • • • • • • •• •• • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • Nara: When calling in your reservation,please indicate that you are a delegate to the SCI conference•Phone:619/291-7131 PAYMENT - Credit card room reservation guarantee:All reservations must be guaranteed.Please provide credit card information below,or mail a check for a first night's deposit directly to the hotel after you have received confirmation from the hotel.Rates do not include 10.5%state and room tax. Total amount due$ All fees must be in U.S.dollars ❑ Check/Money Order Make payable to: Town et-Country Hotel ❑Visa ❑MasterCard ❑American Express Card number Expiration date Authorized signature • Roommates: (Name all occupants and their addresses) Name Address Name Address j-a,_3 • SISter 44111rr.,.' 9TNL • Pacific Rim Sister Cities Forum "Community and City Hall: Working Together in a Global Village" July 29 - 30, 1997 San Diego, California Town and Country Hotel What? SCI's Pacific Rim Sister Cities Forum is a special pre-convention forum in conjunction with SCI's Mutual Convention in San Diego, July 31 - August 2, 1997, highlighting the U.S.-Japan relationship and the role and potential of sister city relationships in the dynamic Asia-Pacific region. The PacificRpn Forum is sponsored in part by a grant from the Japan Foundation's Center for Global Partnership. Why? There are more than three-hundred U.S.-Japan sister city and state partnerships-- e than between any two countries. While some of these programs,,dating back to the St. Paul-Nagasaki. . . in 1955, have several decades of history and are among the most active sister city programs anywhere in worg other U.S.-Japan sister city programs sometimes do not reach their full potential due to cross- cultural misunderstandings or inadequate program or volunteer support. With the end of the cold war, there are many new exciting opportunities for sister city exchanges between the U.S., Japan and other Pacific Rim nations,including: trilateral or other exchanges that help-develop a more global perspective and interaciion; issue-oriented projects on quality of life issues facing cities such as life-long education, urban revitalization and economic development; and exchanges using "new" telecommunications technologies such as the Internet and satellite or cable television. Furthermore, there is great potential for developing new sister city affiliations between cities in the Pacific Rim region, particularly with under-served regions such as Southeast Asia. Who? Who should attend the Pacific Rim Forum? In keeping with the theme "Community and City Hall," the ideal delegation from each U.S.-Japan sister city pair would be one to two high level city officials and one to two distinguished citizens from both the Japanese and U.S. sides. In addition, SCI, in coordination with Japan's Council of Local Authorities for International Relations and the San Diego Sister Cities Corporation will invite selected delegates from a variety of other Pacific Rim countries, including representatives of counterpart organizations of SCI in major Pacific Rim nations. International delegates should visit their sister city in the U.S. either before or after the San Diego Convention. Simultaneous translation will be provided in English, Japanese, and Spanish only. More Information? For more information please contact: John Donaldson, Regional Director Asia and Oceania Sister Cities International • 120 South Payne St. Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Phone: 703-836-3535 Fax: 703-836-4815 Internet: <johnd @sister-cities.org> July - W 8:30 30- 9:00a mednesdayGathering of delegates - Coffee - Exhibit tables open 9:00 - I0:15 a.m. - Welcome / Keynote Addresses * Introduction: The Honorable Rodger Randle, SCI President; Distribution of SCI's U.S.-Japan Sister Cities Handbook and Paper on Opportunities for Sister Cities in Southeast Asia * Welcome: The Honorable Susan Golding, Mayor of San Diego (*requested) * Keynote Address: The Honorable Hidenobu Takahide,Mayor of Yokohama (*invited) "Yokohama and San Diego: Forty Years of Partnership" * Keynote address -U.S. or Other Dignitary/Expert on Asia Pacific Region -To Be Determined * Keynote address -Senior Official, CLAIR,Tokyo Office (*invited)_ "The Exchange and Cooperation Activities of Japanese Cities: Best Projects and Trends" • 10:20- 10:30 a.m.-Break/Musical interlude • 10:30 - 11.25 a.m. - Panel Session One: Success Stories from Around the Pacific Rim *Local authorities from four Pacific Rim cities share their success stories/ideas in regard to improving the quality of life of their communities, with special emphasis on the SCI San Diego Convention themes of health, the environment, and education. —The Honorable MorIhiko Hiramatsu, Governor of Oita Prefecture, Japan (*suggested) _ * Winner of the Asian equivalent of the.Nobel;Prize for his dedicated international work. - • - --The Honorable Jeremy Dwyer,Mayor of Hastings,New Zealand (* suggested) *Leader in the mayor's association in New Zealand. Active sister city link with Guillin, China. —Update on issues facing cities in Korea- KLAFIR.offical or Korean Mayor(*suggested) — City official from Chile or other Pacific Rim nation-To Be Determined • 11:30 - 12:30 p.m. - PaneI Session Two - Outstanding Sister Cities Projects and Partnerships Around the Pacific Rim Region -- Mr.Robert Silalahi, Head,Bureau of Inter-Municipal Cooperation, City Government of Jakarta; Secretary General,IULA Asia Pacific Section (*invited) "Best Projects and Opportunities for Sister Cities in Southeast Asia" — San Diego -Tijuana,Mexico-Broad-based partnership- water quality to education (*suggested) --San Diego-Vladivostok-Business development(*suggested) —SCI's Trilateral Exchange Program: U.S.-Japanese cities working together worldwide • 12:30 - 2:15 p.m. - Pacific Rim Lunch Buffet / Exhibits - Networking Session *Exhibits/Tables: -- Pacific Rim Cities Looking for Partner Cities -- Pacific Rim Counterpart Organizations of SCI and CLAIR --Best Ideas for Projects and Exchanges -- Utilizing the Internet and satellite/cable television -- Cross-cultural Communication Tips • --Inexpensive travel, insurance plans -- Businesses and Non-profit Organizations of Interest to Sister Cities -- Service Clubs Active in the U.S., Japan and Other Pacific Rim Nations • c7 .-t( Workshop B: Development Cooperation: Successful Project, Policy, Partnership Models *Key aspects of successful development cooperation in the Pacific Rim region: examples of private - public partnership; the role of NGOs; the activities and potential of local authorities. — Report on the economic and social miracles in Southeast Asia-Speaker To Be Determined — Mr. Paul White, Minister Counselor for Development Cooperation, U.S. Embassy, Tokyo (*invited) —the c000peration activities of Japanese and Korean cities --CLAIR and KLAFIR officials (*suggested) --Additional panelist: To Be Determined 6:3D- 8:30 p.m. - - Mayor Golding's Welcome Reception - Balboa Park *All SCI Annual Convention delegates are invited. *Sanpai!(Cheers!) - The Honorable Susan Golding, Mayor of San Diego The Honorable Hidenobu Takahide, Mayor of Yokohama *Music from around the Pacific Rim: Japan, U.S., Mexico and other Pacific Rim countries. • SCI Annual Convention-.- San Diego, California sister arn., cities INTERNATIONAL Town and Country Hotel July 31 - August 2, 1996 •Speakers on the themes of the environment, education, health care and sister city partnership. • Sight-seeing opportunities in beautiful San Diego. •Cultural events/receptions including the San Diego - Yokohama 40th Anniversary Luncheon. • Opportunities for educational and cultural tours to learn about urban issues in San Diego. For more information contact: Dan Conway/SCI/ 120 S. Payne St. /Alexandria,VA/22314 Phone: 703-836-3535 Fax: 703-836-4815 Internet: info@sister-cities.org Register Today! 57a -6 1 ACT SHik:T Sister Cities International 1997 San Diego Conference San Diego, California , July 30-August 2, 1997 T: Mayor Susan Golding, the City of San Diego, members of the City Council, and San Diego International Sister City Corporation will proudly host SCI's Conference with Mayor Osuna of Yokohama,Japan.Delegates will also be hosted by San Diego's sister city, Tijuana,Mexico and enjoy an evening of friendship.Sister Cities International is now in its fourth decade of fostering citizen diplo- macy, deeper cross-cultural understanding, and global cooperation. President Clinton serves as the Honorary Chair of SCI, the world's premier international community network representing 1,100 U.S. communities and their partners in 1,909 sister cities in 123 nations worldwide. SCI's Conference will provide access to community and municipal leaders,public and private sector professionals,volunteer com- mittees, youth groups and schools, and government representatives all of whom support innovative exchange programs across the country.The Conference will feature interactive workshops and forums for discussing global issues,networking with counterparts, and developing strong local programs.This year's thematic seminars will focus on Health,Education and the Environment. Your participation will help us chart our future as we sail into the new millennium. HIGH- • Special Pre-Conference Forum: Pacific Rim Sister Cities Forum(July 29-30, 1997,ADDmONAL FEE REQUIRED) LIGHTS• • International Delegates Reception(Tuesday,July 29) - •School Children's Art from San Diego representing 14 Sister Cities interacting with 14 elementary schools •Mayor Susan Golding's Welcoming Reception and Parade of Nations • San Diego/Yokohama 40th Anniversary Luncheon and Kimono Show_ - • • . • Tijuana,Mexico,Cultural Exploration and Dinner •Australian Art Exposition—sponsored by the National Organization of the Australian Sister Cities • 1998 Conference Reception sponsored by Greater Miami and Metro Dade County,Florida •All Nippon Airways Awards Ceremony •Saturday Farewell Dinner •Exhibits from public and private sectors focusing on Health,Education and Environment&and Award Winning Programs •National Youth Programs and Ambassador Association activities and workshops S IAL SCI's Pacific Rim Sister Cities Forum(July 29-30,1997) sponsored in part by a grant from the Japan Foundation's Center for Global _. T: .P_artnership,will highlight-the.important role:played by sister cities throughout the dynamic-Pacific Rim region,-with special work-- shops focusing on U.S.-Japan relations and other Pacific Rim partners.Sister Cities has been at the forefront in facilitating cultural activities,volunteer development,and economic and community development,providing a variety of exchanges opportunities.Pre- Conference Event:Pacific Rim Forum—Tuesday,July 29 to Wednesday,July 30. Additional fee required. WHEN: • Scheduled conference activities:Wednesday,July 30 to Saturday, August 2, 1997 WHERE: Town &Country Hotel 500 Hotel Circle North, San Diego, California 92108-3091 • Phone: 619/291-7131 or Fax: 619/291-3584 COST: Conference Registration::.- -..--_-- Early Bird Special . ...-...Advance On-Site Until: 1/31/97 (Deadline:6/27/97) (After 6/27/97) International Delegates .$355 $380 - $395 Adults:U.S.Member $355 $380 $395 U.S.Non-Members $370 $395 $410 National Youth Program (fixed rate) $220 Ambassador Association (fixed rate) $295 For All Conference Delegates(additional fee required): Pacific Rim Forum Member $80 $95 $110 CONTACT: SCI Conference Services Department at: • Phone: 703/836-3535; Fax:703/836-4815; E-mail: dconway@sister-cities.org ' .fir illS e t S a i 1 f o r S a n D . . i e g _ o : .:! . America ' s Greatest Vacat -i -o- n; City . - <fa -7 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CITY COUNCIL EXPENSE POLICY S (a) Policy statement. Section 2.05 of the Home Rule Charter of the City of Southlake provides that the "members of the Council shall serve without pay or compensation; provided, however, that they shall be entitled to reimbursement for expenses in the performance of their specific duties when approved by the Council." Several organizations at the state, federal, and local levels provide beneficial meetings and educational seminars for elected officials throughout the year. These meetings and seminars are helpful to elected officials in fulfilling their responsibility to the citizens and are important in fostering legislation favorable to the city. It is the policy of the city council to encourage city council members to attend these meetings and seminars in order to more effectively perform their official duties. (b) Purpose. The purpose of the city council expense policy is to implement Section 2.05 of the city charter by providing city council approval for certain expenses, requiring additional city council approval for other expenses, and providing for the administration of city council member reimbursements for approved expenses incurred while performing their duties. (c) Meetings, seminars, and other travel. (1) Events approved for city council members travel. When funds have been budgeted, reimbursement for travel expenses of all city council members is authorized for attendance at the following: (A) Texas Municipal League annual meeting: S (B) Two national meetings each fiscal year from among the following: (i) National League of Cities annual meeting; (ii) Annual Congress of Cities and Exposition; (iii) Other meetings as designated by a majority vote of the city council; (C) Institute of Mayors and Council Members conducted by the Texas Municipal League; and • (D) Local events held in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex area(including Denton and mid-cities) sponsored by the North Central Texas Council of Governments, Texas Municipal League, or the State of Texas (not including overnight expenses). In addition to local events sponsored by these organizations, the city council members shall attend the following events at the city's expense: (i) Monthly Southlake Chamber of Commerce luncheon; (ii) Annual Southlake Chamber of Commerce Banquet; (iii) Annual Southlake employee awards Banquet; (iv) Annual Tarrant County Mayor's Christmas Banquet; and (v) Annual United Way Volunteer of the Year Dinner. (2) Events approved for the mayor or the mayor's designee. In addition to the events approved for reimbursement in Subsection(c)(1), when funds are budgeted, reimbursement of travel expenses of the mayor or the mayor's designee is authorized to: S (A) attend the annual meeting of the U.S. Conference of Mayors; and CITY COUNCIL EXPENSE POLICY PAGE 1 (B) travel annually to Toyoma, Japan, in support of the Sister City Program. • (3) Other events and travel expenses. Reimbursement for expenses of travel of city council members for purposes other than those listed in Subsections (c)(1) and (c)(2) must be approved in advance by a vote of a majority of the city council. (d) Reimbursable travel expenses. The following expenses may be reimbursed when a council member travels to a meeting or seminar or for a purpose authorized pursuant to Subsection (c). Expenses for other purposes must be approved for reimbursement by a majority vote of the city council. (1) Transportation. (A) Personal vehicles. A city council member may be reimbursed for mileage and parking expenses in the use of a personal vehicle for travel beyond the cities contiguous to the City of Southlake if the round trip does not exceed 250 miles. For longer distance trips, reimbursement is limited to the lower of the vehicle mileage reimbursement or the air fare. The mileage reimbursement is at the rate established for reimbursement of city employees. (B) Air travel. Reimbursement for air travel is limited to coach fare and the most direct route available. (C) Airport transportation. Airport shuttle services should be used whenever feasible in preference to taxicabs. (D) Car rentals. Rental of a car is authorized only at a destination reached by air _- • travel when: (i) there is a necessity for ground travel other than to and from the airport; and (ii) another form of reasonable transportation is not available or the use of other forms of transportation is more costly than rental of a car and the parking expense that may be incurred. (2) Meals. (A) Reimbursement for meals and meal tips is limited to $35 per day. Only actual expenses will be reimbursed, and the city will not make reimbursements for alcoholic beverages. (B) In cases when travel is in a location with unusually high meal costs (e.g., New York City), the per diem meal rate may be adjusted by a majority vote of the city council. (3) Lodging. While city council members should be comfortably lodged, luxury hotel accommodations to be reimbursed by the city should be avoided. (4) Tips. Reimbursement for reasonable meal and baggage tips is authorized. CITY COUNCIL EXPENSE POLICY PAGE 2 (5) Travel time. Reimbursement for travel expenses will be made only for the duration of the travel IIInecessary to conduct the city business. (e) Other reimbursable expenses. In order to improve the effectiveness of council members in the performance of their duties and to assure necessary communications between council members and city staff, the city shall provide: (1) a mobile telephone to the mayor for use in the performance of the mayor's duties; (2) an alpha pager to city council members in order for the city staff to send messages of meetings and emergencies and other important information as necessary; (3) a charge card to the mayor or the mayor's designee for use while conducting city business. It is anticipated that it may be necessary for the mayor or the mayor's designee to buy meals during meetings at which city business is conducted; and (4) upon reasonable request by a city council member: (A) equipment or supplies necessary for the performance of the city council member's duties; and (B) government related publications, which shall become the property of the city. (f) Economy. Notwithstanding the authorizations contained in this policy, city council members • are expected to practice economy appropriate to the circumstances of the performance of their duties. (g) Administration of ci ty council expenses. The city secretary is responsible for administering the city council expense reimbursement process. Upon receiving notice of an event or meeting that is authorized for reimbursement by this policy, the city secretary shall provide information to the city council members. City council members wishing to attend a meeting or seminar authorized under this policy, shall notify the city secretary, who shall make the arrangements necessary for registration and travel. (h) Travel advances. The city secretary may issue a travel advance upon the request of a city council member for expenses related to travel for a meeting or seminar in an amount sufficient to cover the costs for transportation, meals, lodging, tips, and registration. In determining this amount, the city secretary shall use the seminar or meeting information available. (i) Travel expense report. Accounting for travel expenses is the responsibility of each city council member. Upon completion of travel, city council members shall submit to the city secretary a complete travel expense report on a form provided by the city secretary. All expenses must be supported by documentation. Receipts for all expenses must be attached to the travel expense report. If a travel advance was issued, the city council member must submit the travel expense report to the city secretary within five business days of returning from the travel and reimburse the city or be reimbursed the difference between the advance and the actual travel expenses. The city secretary shall forward the travel expense reports to the director of finance. 0 CITY COUNCIL EXPENSE POLICY PAGE 3 54-10 4 - City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell,Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Second Ambulance for the Department of Public Safety, Fire Services Division Attached is a memo from Deputy Director Wilson recommending that the bid for the purchase of a second ambulance be awarded to Frazer Ambulance. The history of this purchase needs to be revisited for an understanding of the payment of the vehicle. We originally budgeted for this ambulance in the 1995.budget year. It was my understanding that the bid process had been completed and this ambulance was on order. In August 1996 we encumbered these funds. During the transition from Deputy Director Jerry Williams to Deputy Director Garland Wilson, it was discovered that the ambulance, in fact, had not been ordered and those monies to purchase the ambulance went unspent. 0 In January 1997 we entered into the bid process along with DFW Airport Department of Public Safety. Funding for the ambulance was not included in the 96/97 budget, although the monies are available due to the finance Director setting the funds aside for this purchase. We will include this amount in the mid-year budget realignment,being mindful that these funds are currently available. We received bids for the new ambulance on January 29, 1997 and we are requesting the authorization to purchase the Frazer Ambulance at $104,000. We will be adding the medical equipment and supplies through our budget line items found in the 96/97 DPS Fire Services budget. Deputy Director Wilson will be available to answer any questions and he will also be at the City C ncil meeting to address any of Council's comments or questions. • BC/bls • 5- 6- 1 ,i— -- City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM February 24, 1997 TO: Billy Campbell, Director, DPS From,/ Garland Wilson, Deputy Director, Fire Services Subject: Ambulance Purchase To maximize purchasing ability we entered a contract with DFW Airport to accept bids for an ambulance. Cooperative purchases with other agencies allow the opportunity for companies to offer economical considerations when building more than a unit. The advertisement was published January 6, 1997 and we received bids on January 29,1997. We received the following bids: Taylor $ 79,800.00 Frazer $ 104,000.00 • The Director of Procurement and Materials Management (DFW) and myself have reviewed the bids. Frazer meets all specifications. Taylor Ambulance did not meet specifications. It is my recommendation that Frazer Ambulance is awarded the bid. I am available for comments or questions you may have. GW/gvie City of Southlake,Texas 4! MEMORANDUM February 21, 1997 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kate Barlow, Economic Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Agreement with Public Management Associates (PMA) for Solana Tenants' Wage and Benefit Survey PMA has provided the attached proposal to conduct a wage/benefit survey of major Solana tenants for the express purpose of obtaining data on wages, benefits and quality of life concerns such as • - transportation and availability of basic services. The need for this survey surfaced upon a review of our marketing materials by Insight Research. In particular, Insight noted the need to obtain current labor and employment information about our largest employment base as future organizations consider our community. Furthermore, we will learn what issues the city may need to address in order to enhance our overall corporate environment. • . A mail survey of-Solana's largest 20 employers will-be conducted-in a three-step process. First, all businesses will be sent a survey questionnaire and cover letter. Second, a reminder postcard will be sent one week after the questionnaire is first mailed. Third, those organizations not responding to the initial request, will be sent a second questionnaire approximately three weeks later, and/or receive a reminder phone call. The cost of professional services for this project is $3,500. PMA will assume all responsibility for the three mailings including postage and stationery, and phone calls. Staff requests authorization to enter into an agreement with Public Management Associates to design, „_.;..,._-oversee,survey administrations analyze and-prepare'a report<of,Solana wages, benefits and°quality-- = of life issues. KGB) Attachments: Proposal, City of Southlake 1997 Wage & Benefit Survey d:\wp-files\cirycncl\memos.wpd 5C-/ • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE . 1997 WAGE AND BENEFIT SURVEY PROPOSAL S Submitted by: Public Management Associates 624 West University, Suite 181 Denton, TX 76201 February 20, 1997 • 5e-a PROPOSAL S City of Southlake,Texas Wage and Benefit Survey 1997 SECTION I. INTRODUCTION A. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED APPROACH Public Management Associates (PMA) proposes the design, tabulation, analysis, and reporting of a self-administered mail survey of selected businesses in the Solana complex. The primary product from the assessment will be a final report delivered to city staff that details the findings of the salary, wage and benefit survey. The timeline for project completion will be eight weeks from the date the city provides the business addresses to PMA. B. PURPOSE The purpose of this research is to obtain data on salaries, wages, and benefits from businesses in the Solana complex. In addition, information on quality of life concerns such as transportation, access to housing. and availability of basic services will also be collected. This information can be used by city staff in the city's economic development and marketing efforts. C. OBJECTIVES A mail survey of approximately 20 businesses will be conducted to obtain salary and wage information. The survey will be administered using a questionnaire developed by the consultant and city economic development staff. The primary objectives of this are to: • Develop a salary and wage profile; • Develop a benefit profile; • Assess perceptions about quality of life concerns (transportation, housing, services); and • Compare salary survey data with similar data from other businesses in the metroplex. • 1 563 0 II. ADMINISTRATIVE WORK PLAN Task 1: Survey Instrument: Design and Content The development of the salary survey questionnaire will be the responsibility of the consultant. based on input from city staff. This input «-ill be used to develop a quality survey instrument, adhering to the standard techniques of instrument design and question construction. As well, the consultant will design a postcard reminder to help increase survey response rate. Task 2: Administering the Survey Instrument The consultant will be responsible for survey administration. The data will be collected by means of a three-step mail survey to Solana businesses. The city will provide a mailing list of all businesses. First, all businesses will be sent a survey questionnaire and cover letter. Second, all businesses will be sent a postcard reminding them of the survey and asking for their cooperation one week after the questionnaire is first mailed. Third, those businesses not responding to the initial request for information and postcard follow-up will be sent a second questionnaire approximately three weeks later. PMA will complete all the mailings associated with the survey. Telephone numbers will be provided to PMA for follow-up telephone calls to those businesses who do not respond to mail requests for information. The three-phase approach to the salary survey is standard for mail surveys and should produce an acceptable response rate. • • Task 3: Coding and editing of survey questionnaires Upon receiving the completed survey questionnaires. the consultant will manually code and edit all instruments. Extraneous or invalid responses will be corrected and any necessary • coding will be performed. Survey questionnaires will then be sent to the data entry facility where data will be entered into the computer and transferred to floppy disks. Task 4: Construction and protection of survey database Using the latest state-of-the-art of statistical software (SPSS-PC 6.0 for windows ) the raw data file will be analyzed. Basic frequency distributions will be prepared to detect the presence of any data errors that could have occurred during keypunching. A sample of cases will be checked for accuracy and any discrepancies will be corrected. Complete protection and confidentiality of the survey database will be assured during all phases of data analysis: Access to database will be limited to the consultant only. Task 5: Data Analysis and Report Generation The same statistical software used in data analysis will be used to generate tablesfor inclusion in the final report to the city. Frequency distributions for each survey question and business characteristics will be developed. Data collected will be compared to aggregate salary. S wage, and benefit information for other metroplex businesses. 2 se V SECTION III. PROJECT COST AND PAYMENTS • 1 The firm-fixed fee for the project is $3.500. 411 • Se-6- SECTION III. PROJECT COST AND PAYMENTS • The firm-fixed fee for the project is $3,500. SECTION IV. SIGNATURES James J. Glass Curtis E. Hawk Principal City Manager Public Management Associates City of Southlake • • 5e-6 City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 26, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation RE: Authorization to Bid Contract Mowing As you know, during the FY 1996-97 budget process we added a line item for contract mowing of city parks, city facilities,rights-of-ways, medians, and state highway rights-of-ways of FM 1709 and SH 114. The estimated budget is $72,400 so this service must be publicly bid. Staff has prepared the bid documents. Please put an item on the March 4, City Council agenda for City Council authorization to bid contract mowing. If you have any questions please call me at 481-5581 extension 757. vlL_ KML City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter in a Cost Reimbursement Interlocal Agreement with Dallas Area Rapid Transit(DART)to Construct a Concrete Crossing at Brumlow Ave. Background The railroad tracks which cross Brumlow Ave.just north of S.H. 26 are owned by Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART). As anyone who has driven Brumlow Ave.can attest that the crossing is in bad shape. Southlake's street division has made emergency repairs when necessary to the crossing with DART's approval. Public crossing agreements with the railroads require that any public crossing improvements are not the responsibility of the railroad; however, the maintenance is the railroad's responsibility. During the summer of 1996, staff requested a cost estimate for the construction of the Brumlow Ave. crossing. DART apparently took bids for this work. According to Ms. Jan Seidner, DART, the proposal from Phillips/May Corporation is still a valid bid to DART for the Brumlow Ave. crossing. Based upon that bid,the City's cost for a 54-foot concrete crossing being constructed one-half at a time to allow traffic across the construction would be$33,807. (See an attached letter to Ms. Seidner.) Fiscal Impact Funding for this improvement will come from Fund 700-1994 Street Bond Projects. Recommendation Staff recommends that City.Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a Cost Reimbursement Interlocal Agreement with Dallas Area Rapid Transit(DART)for the construction of a concrete crossing on Brumlow Ave. to reimburse DART in the amount of$33,807. Please place this item on the Regular City Council Agenda for March 4, 1997, for City Council's review and consideration. B W/ls Attachments: Agreement Phillips/May Corporation Letter dated October 1, 1996 D:\WP-FILES\RR\CROSSING\BRjJ OW.MEM 5E-1 C IRP(IRATIQN Via Fax &Mall (749-3664) • October 1, 1996 Ms.Son Seidner Commuter Roil &Railroad Management • DART P.O.Sax 660163 Dallas,Texas 75266-0163 Re: DART Contract No. C-94000169 Task Order 23- Brumlow Road @ SSW 617.00, DOT No.789 743H in Southlake WaS No. 100-90000-3-50352-42 Dear Jan; This letter is our proposal to furnish and install work for the above.oapfianed task order per our contract and Exhibit-'S'of the bid documents. Work Description Reconstruct rrvmlflw Road with new cohcrete crossing. Crossing w l be done under traffic one-half at a firm_ tten tt rYescripfk7n Amount S 25 Reconstruct concrete crossing,54'49$476 $25.707 22 Spot surface 54 TF 0$1'00 540D 30 Mobilization,2 trips 04300 600' 31 Spectal barricading and flagging TOTAL t33,807 Aiternote Reamnstrrjcl 8rurrrlow'Road with anew, ere •cattier RvQU Witt be shut down filf�� for 48 hours to complete crossing. 25 Reconstruct concrete crossing. 45 rd!$476 $21,420 22 Spot surface-45 TF 0$100 4,500 30 Mobilization. 1 trip @$300 '300 31 Special barricading TOTAL $24120 4861 Sharp Striae • Vales, TX 75242 • 024'63x-3331 • FAX 224.835_56L77 ` • 5E-2 Work can begin five working days after Notice to Proceed and wilt be completed within ten working days thereafter. SPlease call it you have any questions. Respectfully submitted. PHIWPS/ Y C ORATION Gilbert May President • SE-3 THE SATE OF TEXAS } S KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF DALLAS } COST REIMBURSEMENT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THAT this Agreement (the "Agreement") made and entered by and between DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT ("DART"), a regional transportation authority organized and existing pursuant to Chapter 452, Texas Transportation Code, and the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ("SOUTHLAKE"), a Texas municipal corporation. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, DART owns certain railroad right-of-way within the corporate limits of Southlake(the"DART Property")on which is located an existing at-grade public road crossing for Brumlow Ave. (the"Crossing"); and, WHEREAS, the Crossing is in need of reconstruction; and, WHEREAS, by virtue of the existing crossing easement granted by SSW Railway to SOUTHLAKE,responsibility for paying for such Crossing reconstruction is that of SOUTHLAKE and, • contractor alreadyunder contract who can perform such services; WHEREAS,DART has a NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and other good and valuable consideration in hand received,by each of the parties, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, DART and '. • SOUTHLAKE do hereby agree as follows: 1. DART Obligations. 1.01. DART shall cause its contractor Phillips May Corporation(the"Contractor"),under existing DART contract#C-94000169 to reconstruct the existing Brumlow Ave.public road crossing of the DART owned "Cotton Belt Line" located at Mile Post as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all pertinent purposes. 1.02. The reconstruction contract (the "Contract") shall include all labor and materials necessary for the removal of timber crossing material from the main line and reconstruction of the Crossing with Century precast concrete slabs in accordance with railroad industry standards. 1.03. DART will over see the work by the Contractor to insure its performance complies with the terms of the Contract. • 5E-4 2. SOUTHLAKE Obligations. Upon completion of the Contract by the Contractor, and S approval thereof by DART and SOUTHLAKE, SOUTHLAKE shall reimburse DART for the cost of such work in the amount of$33,807 within ten(10)working days after receipt from DART of certification of the satisfactory completion of such reconstruction work. 3. Notices. Any notice required or permitted to be given by either party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered personally or three(3) days following the deposit of such notice in the United States Mail, sent by certified mail,return receipt requested, in a postage paid envelope addressed to the party at the address set out below: - DART DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT P.O. Box 660163 Dallas, Texas 75266-7210 Attention: Lonnie E.Blaydes Vice President Commuter Rail &Railroad Management CITY CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake,Texas 76092 Attention: Robert R. Whitehead,P.E. Director of Public Works S 4. Indemnity. To the extent permitted by law,DART,for itself,its Contractor and permitted assigns,shall defend,indemnify and hold SOUTHLAKE,its officers,employees and agents free and harmless from any and all claims,\lawsuits,judgments, costs and expenses for personal injury or ti. death,property damage or other harm for which recovery of damages is sought that may arise out - of or be occasioned by reason of the negligent act or omission of DART of the Contractor in''' connection with the performance of the Contract pursuant to this Agreement; EXCEPT, HOWEVER,that the indemnity herein provided shall not apply to any liability resulting from the sole negligence of SOUTHLAKE,its,officers,agents, employees or contractors and in the event of joint and concurrent negligence of both DART and SOUTHLAKE;responsibility, if any, shall be apportioned comparatively in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without, however, waiving any governmental immunity available to either party under Texas Law,and without waiving any defense of the parties under Texas Law. The provisions of this paragraph are solely for the • benefit of the parties hereto and are not intended to create or grant any rights, contractual or otherwise,to any third person or entity. 5. Entirety and Amendments. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, if any relating to the matters addressed herein, and may be amended or supplemented only by a written instrument executed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. 6. Parties Bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the executing parties and their respective successors and approved assigns. • 5E-5 7. Number and Gender. Words of any gender used in this Agreement shall be held and • construed to include any other gender; and words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa,unless the text clearly requires otherwise. 8. Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. Venue for any legal action arising by virtue of this Agreement shall lie in Dallas County, Texas. 9. Signature Authority. Each of the individuals signing this Agreement on behalf of the parties warrants that he is duly and properly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of his respective entity. IN.WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement in duplicate originals this day of , 19 . DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT By: LONNIE E. BLAYDES Vice President, Commuter Rail III .Railroad Management By: RICK STACY City of Southlake Mayor D:\W P-FILES\RR\CROSSING\BRUMIA W AGR • S5E-6 ,. EXHIBIT A • NORTH t . • T CfiARt :4-11111cDINBOW nut 1 .... alma 'Y' ,,,. oE.METU °'_ ,„ ., W {+ .4„..: _., N 1 Y r•; �' nl E .. • i , ,.... • n IAF :11filli, • .. ,. tia�.y ' • E 7= 21 RI fill 0 S , T ,...UI . ., . . .„..,,.....,,,,,%::::„..„—:,. ..,...:,..........:• . ... , ....„..,,..„, . .7. � ...,...._.„..:,.... .. 7, • . . ..„- ... `ti:r.:r r• , t.,, , :VA- %. . -. ..._,,,, . ' LE ..., ; , ,: • . . , _ „::, -: •,r,7-',2z.u.. g. ., • ice' vl� .+jt..Ej ! I! YE : _.. •. • • .x 1.. yr. • 34 .rtvii W .=�J��;��{`,r•;� ear _7:. t'�p� - .. ....5. .') 7.;.......: .• , . 14:•' •,• .43 •';••••••.• 7.-.• „4;•.- . ...-. i..risw 1 tEtliriiiii ,•.-.?::z4,z;L•t::".;,. (• spry T- ,4 .[+so^-'...,y¢,'Y�y, ••: , •r -,,1. : ` 1 .. YF % :lL t • :yt ..>fv `•keys .• '_ tr••._ ,' .. 1>C -1- A10 . 789 7iLd 0 5E-7 City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 25, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Emergency Contract to Install Sanitary Sewer to the Public,Works Facility In December, 1996 we discussed the need to install sanitary sewer to the new public works facility on East Continental since the existing septic system was experiencing periodic failure. After our conversation we fixed the pump that had been causing a part of the problem. At that time staff decided not to pursue the "immediate" installation of the sanitary sewer, but to tie it into another project on Peytonville. Recently the septic field has shown signs of failure and raw septage has shown up on the ground at this location. In addition there is a building to the east of our property that is in need of sanitary sewer service. I solicited four quotes to perform the work that had been designed for the project. The results of this request is shown in the table below: CONTRACTOR PRICE Wright Construction $44,460.00 H& W Utilities $60,512.78 Barson Utilities $66,276.25 Bil-Mik, Inc $81,900.00 We had budgeted$31,000 in our 1996-1997 budget to perform this work. Since all of the above quotes were in excess of our budgeted amount, I contacted the contractor performing the utility line work at Ground Storage#1. Saber Development agreed to perform the work at the Public Works site for the unit prices in effect at GS #1, with the addition of a $1,000 mobilization fee. The total price for Saber to perform the work was $36,905. I also contacted Wright Construction again in an attempt to renegotiate their price. I was able to reduce their price to $32,127.50. We recommend that an emergency be declared regarding the repair of the septic system at the public orks c'li and that we be allowed to contract with Wright Construction to perform this work. JH/ h D:\WPDOCS\PWSAN.WPD • 5F-1 City of Southlake,Texas M_E_M Q_R_A N D IM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution No. 97-15, Authorizing the City Attorney to Proceed with Condemnation of 0.045 Acre Parcel of Land in the Walter D. Beall Survey, Abstract No. 82 and Being Part of a Called 79.21 Acre Tract of Land Conveyed to Emory Jones and Wife Elnora Jones (Jones Tract) as Evidenced by Deed Recorded in Volume 380, Page 411 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, to Acquire the Property for the Construction of a Meter Station on the Denton Creek Pressure System for Trinity River Authority B ackgruund City of Southlake is acquiring the easements and any fee-simple land required for the construction of the Denton Creek Pressure System (DCPS), the main sanitary sewer line which will serve north Southlake. The last parcel to be acquired is the location of the"meter station" which will meter the flow from the DCPS. The land lies within the town limits of Roanoke. The owner is Mr. Jones, however, it is under contract to Mr. Brad Barington. Mr. Barington is planning to build a 250 residential subdivision on the property. Because of the contract to purchase, negotiations are being conducted with Mr. Barington. The City needs to acquire 35-foot by 56-foot portion of the land in fee-simple for the meter station. As part of the DCPS pipeline easement was already acquired on the property and the"meter station" fee-simple property will overlay the existing easement. Because the meter station was the last item to be designed, the location was determined after the pipeline easement was acquired. Southlake has contracted with Espey, Huston and Associates, Inc. (EHA) to acquire the necessary easements and land purchases. EHA has subcontracted with Right-of-Way Acquisition Consultants (ROWAC) for the acquisition service. ROWAC has negotiated with Mr. Jones and Mr. Barington without success as of this date. See an attached letter from ROWAC. Re_commem ati_on Staff recommends that City Council approve Resolution No. 97-15, authorizing the city attorney to proceed with condemnation of 0.045 acre parcel of land in the Walter D. Beall Survey, Abstract No. 82 and being part of a called 79.21 acre tract of land conveyed to Emory Jones and wife Elnora Jones (Jones Tract) as evidenced by deed recorded in Volume 380, Page 411 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, to acquire the property for the construction of a meter station on the Denton 5G-1 3, MEMORANDUM 40 CURTIS E. HAWK RESOLUTION 97-15 FEBRUARY 28, 1997 PAGE 2 Creek Pressure System for Trinity River Authority. Please place this item on the Regular City Council Agenda for March 4, 1997, for City Council's review and consideration. - l BW/ls Attachments: Resolution 97-15 Exhibit"A" and"B" - Parcel No. 30 Description ROWAC Letter dated February 25, 1997 General Warranty Deed- Proposal II 1W I'-FILES\RESW7.OIS.MEM S 5G-2 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO BRING A CONDEMNATION ACTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP OF LAND FOR USE BY THE CITY OR FOR OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES PERMITTED BY LAW. Whereas, the City of Southlake is in the process of constructing a meter station on the Denton Creek Pressure System for Trinity River Authority which will serve existing and future developments in the city; and Whereas, in order to complete construction of the project, it is necessary for the city to acquire fee simple ownership of land from owner; and • Whereas,the city council has determined that certain tracts of land would be in the public interest to acquire for the future meter station or, in the alternative, for utilization for other public purposes; and Whereas,the city and the owner of said property have been unable to reach an agreement on the acquisition of this property; and Whereas, the city council now deems it necessary to authorize the city attorney to initiate condemnation proceedings in order for fee simple ownership of land. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 The city attorney is hereby authorized to bring a condemnation lawsuit for the purpose of acquiring approximately 0.045 acre parcel of land in the Walter D. Beall Survey, Abstract No. 82 • 5G-3 J and being part of a called 79.21 acre tract of land conveyed to Emory Jones and wife Elnora Jones (Jones Tract) as evidenced by deed recorded in Volume 380, Page 411 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, being more particularly described as exhibit"A" and exhibit "B". SECTION 2 The city council finds that such acquisition in this condemnation action is necessary in order to serve the public health, safety and welfare. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF , 19 Mayor Attest: • City Secretary D:\W P-FILES\RES\97 OIS.RES • 5G-4 Permanent Metes Station Tract (Fee Simple) D-3024 Wafter D. Beall Survey, A-82 EH&A Job No. 16156-01 0.045 Acre EXHIBIT"A" December 19, 1996 4110 EXHIBIT 'Al DENTON CREEK REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DENTON CREEK PRESSUI)E SYSTEM PHASE III PARCEL NO. 30 DESCRIPTION BEING A 0.045 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND IN THE WALTER D. BEALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 82 AND BEING PART OF A CALLED 79.21 ACRE TRACT OF'LAND CONVEYED TO EMORY JONES AND WIFE ELNORA JONES (JONES TRACT) AS EVIDENCED HY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 380, PAGE 411 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 0.045 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING at a 5/8 inch iron rod found for the northeast corner of said Jones tract, same being the southeast corner of a called 10.90 acre tract of land conveyed to Craig Chapman and recorded in Volume 731, Page 546, DRDCT. Said iron rod also being in the east line of said Beall Survey; THENCE S 00° 21' 5T W, with the east line of said Jones tract and said Beall Survey, at 242.49 feet passing the northwest corner of Marshall Creek Subdivision an addition to the City of 411 Marshall Creek, per plat recorded in Volume 610, page 257 (DRDCT), said addition was formerly known as Green Acre Estates, 2nd Section, per plat recorded in Cabinet B, Slide 250 (DRDCT), and continuing along the common line between said Jones tract and said addition, for a total distance of 565.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 00° 21' 5T W, continuing along said common line, a distance of 35.00 feet; THENCE departing said common line and crossing said Jones tract the following three courses and distances: 1) N 89° 38' 03'W, a distance of 56.00 feet: 2) N 00° 21' 57' E, a distance of 35.00 feet; 3) S 89' 38' 03' E, a distance of 58.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1960 square feet or 0.045 acre of land. A plat of even date herewith accompanies this description. • III 5G-5 Page 1 of 2 r • Permanent Meter Station Tract (Fee Simple) D-3024 Walter D. Beall Survey, A-82 EH&A Job No. 16156-01 0.045 Acre EXHIBIT "A" December 19, 1996 EXHIBIT "A'' DENTON CREEK REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DENTON CREEK PRESSURE SYSTEM PHASE III PARCEL NO. 30 DESCRIPTION SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBUC RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Company Name: Esoev. Hus & Associates. Inc. By: OF 1111 •lgrftiF.17 f- Sury or's Name: John Strawbridge eY JOHN STRAWBRIDGE \.1 4283 �; • 9N:yfII3�f'•1 o • Registered Professional Land Surveyor, Texas No. 4283 O s u tzv4- Date of Survey: October. 1993 411 5G-6 Pegs 2M2 Temporary Construction Easement D-3025 Wafter D. Beall Survey, A-82 EH&A Job No. 16156-01 0.045 Acre December 19, 1996 EXHIBIT`B" EXHIBIT 'B' DENTON CREEK REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DENTON CREEK PRESSURE SYSTEM PHASE III PARCEL NO. 30 DESCRIPTION BEING A 0.083 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND IN THE WALTER D. BEALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 82 AND BEING PART OF A CAVED 79.21 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO EMORY JONES AND WiFE ELNORA JONES (JONES TRACT) AS EVIDENCED BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 380, PAGE 411 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 0.083 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING at a 5/8 inch iron rod found for the northeast corner of said Jones tract, same being the southeast corner of a called 10.90 acre tract of land conveyed to Craig Chapman and recorded in Volume 731, Page 546, DRDCT. Said Iron rod also being In the east line of said Beall Survey; THENCE S 00' 21' 57' W, with the east line of said Jones tract and said Beall Survey, at 242.49 feet passing the northwest corner of Marshall Creek Subdivision an addition to the City of Marshall Creek, per plat recorded in Volume 610, page 257 (DRDCT), said addition was formerly known as Green Acre Estates, 2nd Section, per plat recorded in Cabinet B, Slide 250 (DRDCT), and continuing along said course and the common line between said Jones tract and said addition, for a total distance of 555.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 00' 21' 57'W, continuing along said common line, a distance of 55.00 feet THENCE departing said common line and crossing said Jones tract the following three courses and distances: 1) N 89° 38' 03' W, a distance of 66.00 feet; 2) N 00' 21' 5T E, a distance of 55.00 feet; 3) S 89'38' 03' E, a distance of 66.00 feet to the POiNT OF BEGINNING and containing 3630 square feet or 0.083 acre of land. A plat of even date hetewith accompanies this description. !II SG-7 Page 1 of 2 Temporary Construction Easement D-3025 Wafter D. Beall Survey, A-82 EXHIBIT"B" EH&A Job No. 16156-01 0.045 Acre December 19, 1996 EXHIBIT '8' DENTON CREEK REGIONAL VVASTEWATER SYSTEM DENTON CREEK PRESSURE SYSTEM PHASE III PARCEL NO. 30 DESCRIPTION SURVEYOR'S CERT1FICATk TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Company Name: , Huston sodates, Inc. 117 By: 't O F '41 Y TEs�9 fir-- • * t"): • Surveyor's Name: John Strawbridge JOHN STRAWBRIDGE qo 4283 4t:rt- Registered Professional Land Surveyor, Texas No. 4283 No {o Date of Survey: October. 1993 • • • • 5G-8 Page 2 of 2 • SURVEY: WALTER 0. BEALL, ABSTRACT 82 DEN TON CREEK REGIONAL LOCATION: ,DENTON COUNTY. TEXAS WASTEWATER SYSTEM SEMENT ACQUISITION: "A" 0.045 AC. 1960 SQ. FT. "B" 0.083 AC. 3630 SQ. FT. DENTON CREEK PRESSURE SYSTEM .A-IOLE PROPERTY ACREAGE: REMAINDER PARCEL PHASE III\SECTION III PLAT OF EXHIBIT "A" & "B" CRAIG CHAPMAN PARCEL NO. 30 (CALLED 10.90 AC) 5/8" I.R.F. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE VOL. 731, PG. 546 O.R.D.C.T. POC �� 1 1 667 NORTH CARROL AVENUE SOU THLAKE, TEXAS 76092 POC °B• gN 41 1 2 ~ ~ MAP OF EMORY JONES Sc WIFE, $l-OC\ M WHOLE PROPERTY ELNORA JONES (DALTED 5LED 915-1 AC)52 CEDAR LANE f f) VOL. 380, PG. 411 D.R.D.C.T. 3 (60' R.O.W.) IBITS/ 'A' & •B" =h 20 19 c„, 18 N SS V) eCOCK N�d-P , �P~ �,S o'o•Q - 4,�at ti� N>' 6\vk 2S'G' p§i, : DNS- AN4��tic y. • 6 0 1 POB 'By G G�' O Ti • E S 00'21'57" W 35.00' 1PORAAR(CONSTRUCTION 1 / EJVI POB 'A' T2 N 89'38'03" W 56.00' EASEMENT - • T4 1 2 3 T3 N 00.21"57" E 35.00' T7 1•3 Ti 5 ` T4 S 89'38'03" E 56.00' • T T5 S 00.21'57" W 55.00' PALM LANE 76 N 89'38'03" W 66.00' EX- BIT -A- / 16 (60' R.O.W.) T7 N 00'21'57" E 55.00' PERMANENT METER . T8 S 89'38'03" E 66.00' STATION TRACT p1 20 19 18 CCK O ~, DESCRIPTION OF EVEN DATE HEREWITH ACCOMPANIES THIS PLAT. B 14 / 4c ,,,Q.cc t t T f q~F 9 Engine�rinq & Environmental Consultants re" W �O•• ill13500 Montfort Orive, site 230 John Strawbridge R.P.L.S. 4283 f - Dallas, Texas 75240 (972) 387-0771 JOHN STRAWBRIDGE ► PREPARED BY • DRH i �/ CHECKED BY Js SCALE: 1" = 100' �vNA'rss3o`..''''o 9gre• s s ti„ ,,. i DATE 12ti i/96 0 5o' 100' zoo' s u_ E.H. & A. JOB/TRAC.I. 16156 rAncaTo.a,p 159MI' PM:PA 0'F'R6,1-31r6.6C RECORDS n-N324 k 0-3075 5G-9 ip i February 25, 1997 Mr. Bob Whitehead Director of Public Works ,� City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System - Parcel 30 Dear Mr. Whitehead: Per your request, ROWAC is presenting a summary of negotiations on Parcel 30, plats and field notes and the General Warranty Deed which will be used to acquire the property needed for the meter station. Initial contact was made with the property owner, Dr. Bobby Jones, on January 13, 1997. We were notified at that time that the property was under contract to a residential real estate developer, Mr. Brad Barrington. Additionally, we were told by Dr. Jones that he would not do anything to interfere 1, with the sale of his property. Therefore, we were instructed by Dr. Jones to satisfy Mr. Barrington's concerns. Dr. Jones said that if we could satisfy Mr. Barrington, he would agree to the sale of the land required for the meter station. Initially,Mr.Barrington was agreeable to the meter station, and even the donation thereof, because he perceived that he may be able to establish a connection to the Southlake sewer line instead of the less convenient Roanoke sewer line. As the developer, he knows that he would be required to provide access to local sewer. We had numerous discussions with employees of the cities of Southlake and Roanoke and the Trinity River Authority(TRA) in an effort to accommodate Mr. Barrington. After a meeting with Mr. Bob Whitehead, Mr. Bill Smith with TRA, Mr. Larry Rankin who is the broker of the property, Mr. Lee Allison who is both Mr. Barrington's engineer and the City Engineer for Roanoke, Mr. Barrington and his wife and myself, Mr. Allison recommended that Mr. Barrington negotiate the best price he can for the property since this meter station will not interfere with the planned development. It was further agreed that there will be further effort made for Mr. Barrington to have access to the new sewer line saving him considerable development costs. It was agreed that Mr. Barrington would be granted what he requested. In later conversations, Mr. Barrington was not satisfied with the amount of compensation offered. Even though he was given assurances that the City of Southlake would work with the City of Roanoke in an effort to establish the needed connection, Mr. Barrington sent a counter offer to the City in the amount of$10,000. The appraised value of the property is $178. After a meeting between Mr. Barrington and myself, he reduced his counter offer to $5,000. • sG—i o RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION CONSULTANTS 3836 Weeburn Drive Dallas.Texas 75229 (214)358-6452 • Fax 214)358-6463 dip} Mr. Bob Whitehead February 25, 1997 Page 2 We have not been able to negotiate with Mr. Barrington for less than the $5,000 counter offer. He has told us that he does not perceive the City of Southlake nor the City of Roanoke as being able to offer him anything in exchange for his cooperation. Mr. Barrington has said on more than one occasion that the City needs to proceed with condemnation if they expect to acquire the property for less than the $5,000 counter offer. Overall, we have had eight contacts with Dr. Jones and 17 contacts with Mr. Barrington relating to this meter station site acquisition. All negotiations conform to the Standards of Professional Practice as promulgated by the International Right of Way Association. ROWAC has prepared the file for condemnation. Please call should you have further questions or concerns. Cordi lly, Cu lar Enclosures: Field Notes, Plat, General Warranty Deed denton\bwhite l.ltr 5G—� l 411p., GENERAL WARRANTY DEED (INCLUDING TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION) Parcel # 30 GF# Stewart Title THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF DENTON § THAT WE, Emory Odell Jones, a.k.a Emory O'Dell Jones of Columbia, Missouri, Bobby Ray Jones, of Trophy Club, Texas, and William L. Jones, of Edina, Minnesota, not joined herein by our wives because the hereinafter described property constitutes no part of our homestead and is our sole and separate property, hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sun of*** DOLLARS ($ ***) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand by the GRANTEE, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant and Denton Counties, hereinafter referred to as GRANTEE, with its principal office at 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, TX 76092, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and for which no lien, either express or implied, is retained or shall exist, has GRANTED, SOLD, and CONVEYED, and by these presents does GRANT, SELL and CONVEY unto CITY all certain land described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated 111) herein for all purposes; and a temporary construction easement, as described in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, to use in connection with the construction of f- FACILITIES on the area described in Exhibit "A", said temporary construction easement to expire upon completion of construction and acceptance by GRANTEE of said FACILITIES. The temporary construction easement granted herein shall be used as a work area by GRANTEE, but GRANTEE shall replace any fences within the temporary construction easement without cost to GRANTOR, and shall restore the property which is subject to the temporary construction easement as closely as possible to its condition prior to entry thereon. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging, unto the said CITY, its successors and assigns forever. And GRANTOR does hereby bind GRANTOR and GRANTOR'S heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, to WARRANT and FOREVER DEFEND, all and singular, the said premises unto the said CITY its successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof. This conveyance is made to consummate a negotiated sale of the above described premises in lieu of condemnation proceedings and the consideration paid to GRANTOR 5G-1 2 dr_ General Warranty Deed/Page 2 includes and covers all damages and claims which GRANTOR might have asserted in condemnation proceedings. EXECUTED this day of , 19 Emory Odell Jones Bobby Ray Jones William L. Jones C:\OFFICE\ROWAC\DENTON\PARCEL30\DEED&.TCE 111 5G-13 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDITM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ronald J. Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Approval for T.U. Electric to Provide Electric Service to the City's Booster Pump Station No. 1 at Pearson Lane and W. Southlake Blvd. Background In the Fall of 1996, the City requested rate information from TU Electric and Tri-County Electric for the purpose of furnishing power to the pump station facilities located at Pearson Lane and W. Southlake Blvd. The annual costs proposed by the companies based upon our project electrical usage by this pump station were: TU Electric $85,162.00 (5.5 cents per kWh) Tri-County Electric $95,061.67 (6.139 cents per kWh) Both of the utility companies were(or would soon be) capable to provide feeds from supplemental sources, thereby reasonably assuring a reliable power supply. In addition,both companies would supply the required transformer and pad. TU Electric guaranteed their rate for a three-year period,while Tri-County Electric stated that they had no plans for an upward adjustment"as of this date . . ." Recommendation Based upon the review of the two proposals by the electrical consulting engineer, Chiang, Patel and Yerby, Inc. and their conclusion which includes the cost differential and the rate guarantee of three years, staff concurs and recommends that we enter into an agreement with TU Electric to provide electrical service for this facility. (See an attached letter.) Please place this item on the Regular City Council Agenda for March 4, 1997, for City Council's review and consideration. RH/ls Attachments: Mike Craiglow Letter dated January 29, 1997 • TU Electric and Tri-County Electric Proposals 5H-1 • PRINCIPALS: • 0- Chiang, Patel & Yerby, Inc. .. W. Walter Chiang, P.E. Consulting Engineers • Planners • Project Managers Pete K Patel,P.E.• Philip S. Yerby,P.E. .Edward M.Motley,P.E. 'Philip M.Armstrong,P.E. January 29, 1997 RE 0777ED Mr. Robert Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works J A N 3 0 1997 City of Southlake DEFT.OF PUBLIC WORKS 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,Texas 76092 Mr. Whitehead: I have reviewed proposals from TU Electric (TUE) and Tri-County Electric Cooperative (TCEC) for providing electric service to the City's new Booster Pump Station #1. The basis for the proposal was the projected electrical usage by this pump station for the twelve calendar months of 1998. My review focused on three items: • Dollar cost to the city. • Material and equipment furnished and installed by Power Co. • • Availability of backup substations and feeders. My condusion is that the TU Electric proposal is more favorable to the City for this facility. The main factors for making this decision were: • The electrical cost for power was $85,162.00 by TUE and $95,061.67 by TCEC. This TUE rate is frozen for three years. • TUE will provide the primary feed to the pad transformer, the concrete pad, and the transformer at no cost to the City. • TUE has adequate back-up capability for power reliability by having three available substations and three available feeders. Based on the above, I respectfully recommend that the City of Southlake enter into a service agreement with TU Electric for electrical service to Booster Pump Station#1. Sincerely, • Mike Craiglow, P.E. • MAC/ps T:\9643.CSL\CORR\RW.LTRI.WPD\PS 5H-2 1820 REGAL ROW, SUITE 200, DALLAS, TEXAS 75235 214-638-0500 METRO 214-263-3960 FAX 214-638-3723 r/ m. TU ELECTRIC Mai anpgere � Rhodes,Jr. January 6, 1997 roa Mr. Bob Whitehead . ECG d� Director of Public Works JAN City of Southlake 0 8 41 4i''. 667 North Carroll Avenue DEPT,OFP Southlake, Texas 76092 • UBj«Wows Dear Mr. Whitehead: • • I appreciate the opportunity to provide a proposal for electric service to the Booster Pump Station No. 1 located at F.M. 1709 and Pearson Road. TU Electric wants to be your preferred energy supplier and help make your project successful. TU Electric will provide the City of Southlake a rate of 5.5 cents per kWh which amounts to an • annual electric charge of$85,162.00. This amount was obtained utilizing kW and kWh factors provided to us in Table 1 of your submittal request, as attached. We will guarantee this rate for a period of three years commencing with the start of service. Electric service to this pump station will be provided underground from TU Electric facilities located along F.M. 1709 to the designated location on your site plan. We will install a 3-phase 25 kV electrical system in conduit which includes the transformer and pad at no charge to the City of Southlake. In addition, this service will have backstand capability utilizing three substations and three area feeders. We care about the quality of service we provide and are confident that you will find TU Electric to be best qualified to meet your electrical needs. I look forward to working with you on this project. Please call me with any questions on this or any other matter. Sincerely, Ya--,—n. (ZIAT4 _ Sonny Rhodes Manager III 5H-3 P.O. Box 1329 Grapevine,Texas 76051 • A..J. k.r,rir+u• rr-i 1 CL Yr YERBY 817 488 52174 NO.137 P003/005 Month Maximum Load Factor KWH • _ t�emant!{�� January 1998 500 0.25 — 93,000 February 1998 500 0.25 84,000 March i998 500 0.30 118,000 ,' April 1998 500 0.35 126,000 , May 1998 500 0.35 130,200 June 1998 500 0.40 144,000 July 1990 500 0.50 186,000 August 1998 500 0.50 186,000 September 1995 500 0.40 144,000 October 1998 500 0.35 130,200 November 1998 500 0.30 116,000 December 1998 500 0.25 93,000 *During the event of a fire, all five pumps could run resulting in a maximum demand of 1300 KW Table 1 - Booster Pump Station Electdcal Usage for Proposal Purposes • 5H-4 ram Electric Cooperative, Inc. "The Powerful Alternative" Central I lcadyuartcrs Office 16181 N W Parkway I Ar.Ic,Tx 76020/Ph:(8I7)444-3201 or(817)523-7231/Fax a(8171 444-3542 Southwest District Office/1623 Weatherford Hwy.Granbury,Tx 76048/Ph:(817)279-70I0 or(817)279-7011 I Fax n(8I7)279-7012 Northeast District Office/4741)Keller I licks Rd/Kellcr,TT 76248/Ph:(817)431-1541/Fax M(817)4 3 1-96841 • MEMORANDUM Date:January 14, 1997 To: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works From: David Kliment - Subject: Estimate on cost of service and facilities provided by Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. Tri-County Electric Cooperative has reviewed the power requirements for the proposed Booster Pump Station No. 1 located off of Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709). The Cooperative proposes to serve the facility off of circuit number 1202 fed out of the Keller Substation which is located on Katy Road just north of Keller Hicks Road. The Cooperative can also provide an alternate feed from our Grapevine substation located off of Dove Road. The distribution workplan scheduled for completion in the year 1997 will provide another feed out of our 100 Mw I B ubstation located off of T W King Road. By the close of 1997 the Cooperative will be able to provide three al •e power sources for this site from three separate substations. Existing aerial distribution lines will be used to supply power to the pumping station and the Cooperative will provide underground Primary into the Pump Station property. TCEC will furnish and maintain a three phase 277/480 volt pad mounted transformer with metering equipment mounted on the transformer cabinet as requested in the proposal. Power supply to the proposed transformer will be furnished and maintained by TCEC. We have attached transformer specifications provided by General Electric for your review. Rates quoted in the attached estimate are approved by the Texas Public Utility Commission. As of this date TCEC has no plans for an upward adjustment in the cost of service. Please note that the tariff for TCEC offers a discount in the cost per kWh for loads operating with a load factor greater than 55%. Under paragraph"F", the Cooperative will discount the cost per kWh by$0.000283 for each percentage point of load factor in excess of 55%. If in the course of normal operation the city could achieve a higher load factor,than the operating cost could be significantly reduced. Fri-County Electric Cooperative is a non profit electric distribution system which returns margins to members hrough a patronage capital credit program. The attached estimate on the cost of service does not include the -eturn of patronage capital. Our records indicate that TCEC returned$996.16 to the city of Southlake in the rear 1995. f we can be of assistance in answering any other questions on this proposal, please feel free to contact our )ffice. , 1110 5H-5 fiTRI -COUNTY Electric Cooperative, Inc. "A Commitment to Service and Savings" January 15, 1996 Proposal for City of Southlake Booster Pump Station No. 1 Estimate is based on TCEC Rate Schedule 202.4 Wholesale cost estimated through Brazos Power Marketing based on year 1998 cost. ;' Estimate good through 1/31/1997 reflects 4 year contract with BPM. Customer Charge: $20.00 Energy Charge: $0.036718 Demand Charge: $5.50 Base Power Cost: $0.041650 Wholesale Cost: $0.043070 Days In Billing Peak kWh Load PCRF .Total Service - Month Demand Energy Factor Adjustment Charges Period January 500.00 93,000 25% $0.00142 $6,506.34 31 February 500.00 84,000 25% $0.00142 $6,152.80 28 March 500.00 116,000 31% $0.00142 $7,409.83 31 April 500.00 126,000 35% $0.00142 $7,802.65 30 500.00 130,200 35% $0.00142 $7,967.63 31 500.00 144,000 40% $0.00142 $8,509.73 30 Jui 500.00 186,000 50% $0.00142 , $10,159.58 31 August 500.00 186,000 50% $0.00142 $10,159.58 31 September 500.00 144,000 40% $0.00142 $8,509.73 30 October 500.00 130,200 35% $0.00142 $7,967.63 31 November 500.00 116,000 32% $0.00142 $7,409.83 30 December 500.00 93,000 25% $0.00142 $6,506.34 31 Totals 1,548,400 $95,061.67 Average Cost Per kWh: $0.06139 • 111 5H-6 )1/15/97 03:38 PM SLPUMP1.WK4 . . Section I Sheet No. 1TRI —COUNTY 111 8 Electric Cooperative, Inc. Revision Page.; Tariff for Electric Service SECTION TITLE: PUC Approved October 19, 1993 RATE SCHEDULES STAMP Implemented by TCEC APPLICABLE TO ALL AREAS November 1, 1993 202.4 Large Commercial and Industrial Service, General Three Phase Service, 50 KVA and Over of Installed Transformer Capacity A. Application Applicable to all individually metered commercial and industrial Customers, as well as three- phase residential, noncommercial farm operation and public building,.billed through one meter whose transformer capacity is 50 KVA or over. Service will be furnished under this rate schedule subject to the established rules and regulations of the Cooperative covering this type of service, including all billed adjustments. B. Type of Service Alternating current (AC); 60 hertz; singlephase, 120/240 volts; three-phase 9 e-p 120/208, 277/480 volts as available at the point of delivery. Where service of the type desired by the customer is not already available at the point of delivery, additional charges under the Cooperative's line extension policy and special contract agreements may be required prior to service being furnished. C. Monthly Rate Each billing period the customer shall be obligated to pay the following charges: (1) Customer Charge: $20.00 per meter. This charge is an availability charge for providing electric distribution service; and (2) Demand Charge: $5.50 per kW. This charge for the rate at which energy is used is applied to the maximum kilowatt demand for any period of 15 consecutive minutes during the billing period, as adjusted for power factor, but in no event is billing less than 75% of the highest adjusted kW demand established in the billing period or 11 months preceding the billing period; and (3) Energy Charge: $0.036718 per kWh Payment: Bills are past due if not paid within 16 days of issuance. However, if the due date falls on a holiday or weekend, the due date for payment purposes shall be the next work day after the due d ast due bills are subject to a late charge as provided in section 204.7 of the Cooperative's to 5H-7 D. Minimum Charge • The minimum monthly charge shall be set forth in the applicable contract for electric service but not less than the Applicable Customer Service and Demand Charge. •" E. Primary Service Minimum to be established by contract. If service is furnished at the Cooperative's primary distribution voltage, and the Cooperative does not provide transformation and the billing demand exceeds 30 kw, than a credit of$0.10 per kw demand will be allowed. The Cooperative may meter at secondary voltage and adjust the demand and energy charges by adding the estimated transformer losses. F. High Load Factor Rider Any new or existing industrial customer served or to be served under this rate schedule whose maximum monthly billing demand is 300 kW or greater and whose monthly load factor is in excess of 55% shall receive a credit of$0.000283 per kWh for every percentage point the customer's monthly load factor exceeds 55%. This credit is not available in conjunction with service provided pursuant to any special contract agreements. The monthly load factor shall be defined as the kWh sales for the billing period divided by the product of the billing demand and the hours in the billing period. CIO Billing Adjustment This rate is subject to all billing adjustments. H. Agreement An agreement for electric service with a fixed term may be required by the Cooperative for customers who require line extension to establish electric service. This rate schedule may be changed by order or consent of regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, or if none, by the Cooperative's board of directors and service hereunder is subject to the Cooperative's tariff for electric service. • 5H-8 A T R I -COUNTY Section Sheet No. 11 18 Electric Cooperative, Inc. Revision: 1 Page: Tariff for Electric Service SECTION TITLE: P11C RATE SCHEDULES Approved APPLICABLE TO ALL AREAS September 13, 1996 203. Billing Adjustments The Cooperative shall adjust all bills in accordance with the following adjustments: • 203.1 Power Cost Recovery Factor(Rider PCRF). The monthly charges shall be increased or decreased on a uniform per kWh basis computed monthly as follows: PCRF= (A- B ± C) kWhs • Where: PCRF= Power Cost Recovery Factor(expressed in $ per kWh) to be applied to estimated energy sales for the billing period. A = Total estimated purchased power cost(excluding credits or purchases from all suppliers that are applied directly to particular customers) from all suppliers including fuel for the billing period. B= Total estimated purchased power cost (excluding credits or purchases from all suppliers that are applied directly to particular customers) from all suppliers including fuel which are included in the Cooperative's base rates. The base power cost is computed as: B = (D) (kWhs) D = Base power cost in $/kWh sold of$0.04165 kWh = Total estimated energy sales for billing period (excluding kWh sales to customers served under. the Commercial Service-Economic Development Rate.) C = Adjustment to be applied to the current monthly billing to account for differences in PCRF related costs and revenues for previous periods. 2 Sales Tax All bills shall be adjusted by the amount of any sales tax or other tax attributable to the sale of electric service to the Customer unless Customer has previously provided to the Cooperative satisfactory proof of exemption. 5H-9 f ism •ip l •- Electric Cooperative, Inc. " A Commitment to Service and Savings " January 14, 1996 Proposal for City of Southlake;Booster Pump Station No. 1 Estimate is based on Rate Schedule 202.4 as billed in the year 1996. Customer Charge: $20.00 Energy Charge: $0.036718 Demand Charge: $5.50 Base Power Cost: $0.041650 • Days In Billing Peak kWh Load PCRF Total Service Month Demand Energy Factor Adjustment Charges Period 500.00 93,000 25% $0.00750 $7,088.74 31 Feoruary 500.00 84,000 25% $0.00250 $6,246.24 28 March 500.00 116,000 31% ($0.00250) $6,941.47 31 April 500.00 126,000 35% ($0.00250) $7,293.91 30 May 500.00 130,200 35% ($0.00500) $7,106.67 31 June 500.00 144,000 40% $0.00750 $9,411.51 30 July 500.00 186,000 50% $0.00750 $11,324.38 31 August 500.00 186,000 50% $0.00750 $11,324.38 31 September 500.00 144,000 40% $0.00250 $8,669.91 30 October 500.00 130,200 35% $0.00000 $7,777.20 31 November 500.00 116,000 32% $0.00650 $8,016.79 30 December 500.00 93,000 25% $0.00250 $6,609.79 31 Totals 1,548,400 $97,811.02 Average Cost Per kWh: $0.06317 • 5H-10 J1/14/97 02:23 PM SLPUMP1.WK4 will overlay the existing easement. Because the meter station was the last item to be designed, the location was determined after the pipeline easement was acquired. Southlake has contracted with Espey Huston and Associates, Inc. (EHA) to acquire the necessary easements and land purchases. EHA has subcontracted with Right-Of-Way Acquisition Consultants for the acquisition service. 5-H. In the fall of 1996, the City requested rate information from TU Electric and Tri-County Electric for the purpose of furnishing power to the pump station facilities located at Pearson Lane and West Southlake Blvd. The annual costs proposed by the companies based upon our projected electrical usage by the pump station were: TU Electric $85,162.00 (5.5 cents perk Wh) and Tri-County Electric $95,061.67 (6.139 cents per k Wh). Both of the utility companies were capable to provide feeds from supplemental sources, thereby reasonably assuring a reliable power supply. In addition, both companies would supply the required transformer and pad. Based on the review of the proposals by the electrical consulting engineer, Chiang, Patel and Yerby, Inc. and their conclusion which includes the cost differential and the rate guarantee of three years, staff concurs and recommends that the City enter into an agreement with TU Electric to provide electrical service for this facility. 5-I. Revisions to the Investment Policy. Several years ago, the Internal Revenue Service, passed regulations that made tax-exempt bond issuers rebate, or pay, excess investment earnings from the proceeds of bonds. There is a small issuer exemption which is $5 million or less in bonds issued during a calendar year. The recent negotiated sale of$9.67 million in certificates of obligation and SPDCs $9.22 million sales tax revenue bonds subjects the City to the arbitrage regulations for calendar year 1997. First Southwest Asset Management, the SEC-registered investment advisory affiliate of First Southwest Company, has proposed that the City enter into a `flexible repurchase agreement' to invest the proceeds of the $9.67 million and $9.22 million bonds. A flexible repurchase agreement will ensure that the City maximizes investment earnings up to, or slightly in excess of its arbitrage yield rate. 5-J. The Department of Public Safety, Fire Services Division request approval for the addition of three Reserve Firefighters to the Southlake Department of Public Safety. The three (3) individuals are: Mike Simmons, currently in the Wylie Fire Academy; Michael Wilson, is enrolled in the Fire Protection Program at Tarrant County Junior College; and, Brandon Selman, currently supervises eight employees at Walmart, Inc. Agenda Item #6, Public Forum No comments were made during this agenda item. Agenda Item #7-A, Ordinance No. 480-229, 2nd reading (ZA 96-163) TU Electric REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF THE 3/4/97 MEETING PAGE 7 of 14 —. _ City of Southlake,Texas - IIIMEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Revisions to the Investment Policy Several years ago, the Internal Revenue Service passed regulations that made tax-exempt bond issuers rebate, or pay, excess investment earnings from the proceeds of bonds. This means that an issuer cannot earn more in interest through investing the bond proceeds than what is being paid in interest on the bonds. There is a small issuer exemption, which is $5 million or less in bonds issued during a calendar year. The recent negotiated sale of $9.67 million in certificates of obligation and SPDC's $9.22 million sales tax revenue bonds subjects the City to the arbitrage regulations for calendar year 1997. First Southwest Asset Management, the SEC-registered investment advisory affiliate of First 0 Southwest Company, has proposed that the City enter into a `flexible repurchase agreement' to invest the-proceeds of the $9.67 million and ,$922 million bonds.- -A flexible:-:.repurchase agreement will ensure that the City maximizes investment earnings up to, or slightly in excess of its arbitrage yield rate. Under this agreement, proceeds will be invested according to an estimated draw-down schedule, with a guaranteed investment return. In order to accommodate this type of investment alternative, two sections of the City's Investment Policy need to be revised. Section IV.A.1. of the City's Investment Policy discusses Diversification (of Investments) by Investment Type, and limits investments in repurchase agreements to 50% of the total portfolio. The proposed revision allows-for bond proceeds to be invested in instruments-that will facilitate.. .- arbitrage record keeping and calculation, such as the flexible repurchase agreement. If the City were to invest in a flexible repurchase agreement with the proceeds of the bonds as the policy is written now, the City's total portfolio invested in repurchase agreements would exceed the 50% limitation. . Section IV.A.2.d. is restated to clarify Special Project, Special Purchase, and Construction Funds investments allowed. It permits the use of a repurchase agreement , with excess earnings to be segregated for payment to the U.S. Treasury. Section V.A.S. is modified to comply with recent changes in the Public Funds Investment Act. The modification allows for repurchase agreements to be placed through a fmancial institution • doing business in Texas, and deletes the language referring to 'a bank domiciled in Texas'. 31-/ • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS INVESTMENT POLICY Amended March 4, 1997 • 41) CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS INVESTMENT POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Purpose 1 A. Formal Adoption B. Scope C. Review and Amendment II. Investment Strategy 1 A. Operating Funds B. Debt Service Funds C. Debt Service Reserve Funds D. Special Projects, Special Purpose, or Construction Funds III. Responsibility and Control 2 A. Delegation of Authority and Training B. Internal Controls C. Ethics and Conflict of Interest IV. Investment Objectives - 2 A. Safety of Principal B. Liquidity C. Yield D. Public Trust 4110 V. Investment Portfolio 5 A. Eligible Investments B. Unauthorized Investments VI. Safekeeping and Custody 8 A. Collateralization B. Allowable Collateral and Collateral Levels C. Monitoring Collateral Adequacy and Additional Collateral Securities D. Collateral Substitution E. Safekeeping F. Delivery versus Payment, VII. Selection of Banks and Dealers 11 A. Depository Selection B. Investment Advisors C. Selection of Investment Broker/Dealers and Advisors - , D. Approved Broker/Dealers and Investment Advisors VIII. Reporting - 12 A. Quarterly Reporting Appendix "A" - Certification 13 Appendix "B" - Glossary of Common Treasury Terminology 14 i J-1 -.3 ® I. PURPOSE A. Formal Adoption. The purpose of this document is to set forth specific investment policy and strategy guidelines for the City of Southlake, Texas in order to achieve the goals of safety, liquidity, yield, and public trust for all investment activity. This Investment Policy is authorized by the City Council in accordance with Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code, the Public Funds Investment Act. B. Scope. This Investment Policy applies to all the investment activities of the City, excluding funds governed by Council approved trust agreements and assets administered for the benefit of the City by outside agencies. In addition to this Policy, bonds funds (as defined by the Internal Revenue Service) shall be managed by their governing ordinance and all applicable State and Federal Law. C. Review and Amendment. The City Council of the City of Southlake shall review its investment strategies and policy not less than annually. II. INVESTMENT STRATEGY The City of Southlake maintains one portfolio in which all funds under the City's control are Spooled for investment purposes. Within the pooled portfolio are fund components, each having an investment strategy as described below: A. Investment strategies for operating funds are to assure that anticipated cash flows are matched with adequate investment liquidity. The secondary objective is to create a portfolio structure which will experience minimal volatility during economic cycles. This may be accomplished by purchasing high quality, short to medium term securities which will complement each other. The dollar weighted average maturity of 365 days or less will be calculated using the stated final maturity date of each security. B. Investment strategies for debt service funds shall have as the primary objective the assurance of investment liquidity adequate to cover the debt service obligation on the required payment date. Securities purchased shall not have a stated maturity date which exceeds the debt service payment date. C. Investment strategies for debt service reserve funds shall have as the primary objective the ability to generate a dependable revenue stream to the appropriate debt service fund from securities with a low degree of volatility. Securities should be of high quality and, except as may be required by the bond ordinance specific to an individual issue, of short to medium term maturities. S City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 1 • D. Investment strategies for special projects, special purpose, or construction fund portfolios will have as their primary objective the assurance that anticipated cash flows are matched with adequate investment liquidity. These portfolios should include at least 10% in highly liquid securities to allow for flexibility and unanticipated project outlays. The stated final maturity dates of securities held should not exceed the estimated project completion date. III. RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL A. Delegation of Authority and Training. The Director of Finance and Project/Chief Accountant are designated as Investment Officer(s) of the City and are responsible for investment decisions and activities. The Investment Officer shall attend at least one training session relating to the officers' responsibility under the Act within 12 months after assuming duties. The Director of Finance will retain ultimate responsibility for investment decisions. B. Internal Controls. The Investment Officer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. The ® concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived. C. Ethics and Conflicts of Interest. City staff involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair the ability to make impartial investment decisions. The Investment Officer who has a personal business relationship with an entity seeking to sell an investment to the City shall file a statement disclosing that personal business interest with the Texas Ethics Commission and the City Council. IV. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES The City of Southlake shall manage and invest its cash with four objectives, listed in order of priority: Safety, Liquidity, Yield, and Public Trust. The safety of the principal invested always remains the primary objective. All investments shall be designed and managed in a manner responsive to the public trust and consistent with State and Local law. S City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 2 • A. Safety of Principal. The City shall seek to control the risk of loss due to the failure of a security issuer or grantor. Such risk shall be controlled by investing only in the safest types of securities as defined in Section V-A of this Policy, through portfolio diversification by investment type and maturity, and by collateralization as required by law. 1. Diversification by Investment Type. Diversification by investment type shall be maintained by ensuring an active and efficient secondary market in portfolio investments and by controlling the market and opportunity risks associated with specific investment types. Bond proceeds may be invested, in a single security or investment which exceeds the City's maximum percentages if the Investment Officer determines, that,such an investment is:necessary"to-comply with Federal`arbitrage restrictions or to — facilitate arbitrage=recordkeeping and °calculation. ; Diversification by investment type shall be established by the following maximum percentages of investment type to the total investment portfolio: a. U.S. Government Securities 100% b. States, Agencies, Counties, Cities and Other N50 c. Repurchase Agreements 50% d. Certificates of Deposit 100% • e. Bankers Acceptances 20% f. Commercial Paper 20% g. Money Market Mutual Funds 50% h. ' Eligible Investment Pools 100% 2. Diversification by Investment Maturity. In order to minimize risk of loss due to interest rate fluctuations, investment maturities will not exceed the anticipated cash flow requirements of the funds. The City of Southlake intends to match the holding periods of investment funds with liquidity needs of the City. The maximum final stated maturity of any investment shall not exceed five years. Maturity guidelines by fund are as follows: a. Operating Funds. The weighted average days to maturity for the operating fund portfolio shall be 365 days or less and the maximum allowable maturity shall be three years. b. Debt Service Funds. Debt Service Funds shall be invested to ensure adequate funding for each consecutive debt service payment. The Investment Officer shall invest in such a manner as not to exceed an "unfunded" debt service date with the maturity of any • investment. An unfunded debt service date is defined as a coupon • 3 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,I997 • or principal payment date that does not have cash or investment securities available to satisfy said payment. c. Debt Service Reserve Funds. Market conditions, Bond Resolution constraints and Arbitrage regulation compliance will be considered when formulating Reserve Fund strategy. Maturity limitation shall generally not exceed the call provisions of the Bond Ordinance and shall not exceed the final maturity of the bond issue. All Debt Service Reserve Fund investment maturities shall not exceed five years. d. Special Project. Special Purpose. and Construction Funds. The tt to the U.S. Treasury. The:fiindays;used:for construction and capital im provenient programl II e reasonable..:pred ctable, draw .dijwn sehedUUIes.�Therefore:investmentm_atuurities""shall;geneall r T011ow • • the°.anticipated._:cash "flow requirements Investinenf m ools and moaey_market mutual;funds"-shall:provide readily available funds generally.equal;to one",Wititi'santicipated:cash flow:needs" ar;LLa competitive yield--`altemative:for sliort:.7term fixed rmaturity investments:AA.:singular repurchase:agieement maylbe utilized:"if d'isbiusements areallowed".in Ole amount.`necessary;to"satisfy any ex nditure re est,ape qu, , this investment structure is commonly referred to as a-flexible repurchaseagreeinent All eainuigs-in excess of the allowabb1e—ar1utrageeai7ungs segregated and made available fer�ah necessary-paymentswto:the-U S. Treasury 3. Collateralization. Collateralization of securities will be made in compliance with Section VI of this Policy. B. Liquidity. Liquidity shall be achieved by anticipating cash flow requirements, by investing in securities with active secondary markets and by investing in eligible money market mutual funds and local government investment pools. A security may be liquidated to meet unanticipated cash requirements, to re-deploy cash into other investments expected to outperform current holdings, or otherwise to adjust the portfolio. • City of Southiake Investment Policy-amended Merck4;,1997, 4 • Sc. Yield. The City of Southlake's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account investment risk constraints and cash flow characteristics of the portfolio. D. Public Trust. Investments shall be made with judgement and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of capital as well as the probable income to be derived. V. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO A. Eligible Investments. Investments described below are authorized by Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code as eligible securities for the City. City funds governed by this Policy may be invested in: 1. Obligations of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities, excluding principal-only and interest-only mortgage backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations and real estate mortgage investment 111 conduits. 2. Direct obligations of the State of Texas, or its agencies and instrumentalities. 3. Other obligations, the principal and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by, or backed by the full faith and credit of, the State of Texas or the United States or their respective agencies and instrumentalities, excluding principal-only and interest-only mortgage backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations and real estate mortgage investment conduits. 4. Obligations of states, agencies, counties, cities, and other political subdivisions of any State having been rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm and having received a rating of not less than "A" or its equivalent. 5. Fully collateralized repurchase agreements having a defined termination date, placed through a primary government securities dealer, as defined by the Federal Reserve, or a bank domiciled in Tcxas financial institution doing business in this state, and secured by obligations described in Section V-A 1 above which are eligible investments under the Public Funds City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 5 • Investment Act, pledged with a third party selected and approved by the City, and having a market value of not less than the principal amount of the funds disbursed. The term includes direct security repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements structured in compliance with the Texas Government Code. All City repurchase agreement transactions shall be governed by a signed Master Repurchase Agreement. 6. Certificate's of deposit issued by state and national banks domiciled in Texas that are: a. guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor; or, secured by obligations that are described by Section V-A 1 through 4 above, which are intended to include all direct Federal agency or instrumentality issued mortgage backed securities, but excluding those mortgage backed securities of the nature described in Section V-B, that have a market value of not less than the principal amount of the certificates or in any other manner and amount provided by law for deposits of the City; b. governed by a Depository Contract, as described in Section VII-A, that complies with Federal and State regulation to properly secure Sa pledged security interest; and, c. solicited for bid orally, in writing, electronically, or any combination of those methods. 7. Bankers' acceptances that: a. have stated maturities of 270 days or fewer, b. will be liquidated in full at maturity, c. is eligible for collateral borrowing from a Federal Reserve Bank, and, d. is accepted by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state, if the short-term obligations of the bank, or of the bank holding company of which the bank is the largest subsidiary, are rated not less than "A-1" or "P-1" or an equivalent rating by at least one nationally recognized credit rating agency. 11, City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 ® 8. Commercial paper with a stated maturity of 270 days or less from the date of issuance that either: a. is rated not less than "A-1", "P-1", or the equivalent by at least two nationally recognized credit rating agencies; or b. is rated at least "A-1", "P-1", or the equivalent by at least one nationally recognized credit rating agency and is fully secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state thereof. 9. Money market mutual funds regulated by the Securities & Exchange Commission, with a dollar weighted average portfolio maturity of 90 days or less, that fully invests dollar-for-dollar all City funds without sales commissions or loads; and, whose investment objectives include seeking to maintain a stable net asset value of$1 per share. The City may not invest funds under its control in an amount that exceeds 10% of the total assets of any individual money market mutual fund or exceeds 80% of its monthly average fund balance, excluding bond proceeds and reserves and other funds held for debt service in money market mutual funds. ® 10. Eligible Investment Pools as defined in Section 2256.016 of the Texas Government Code provided that: a. investment in the particular pool has been authorized by the City Council; b. the pool shall have furnished the Investment Officer an offering circular containing the information required by Section 2256.016(b) of the Texas Government Code; c. the pool shall furnish to the Investment Officer investment transaction confirmations with respect to all investments made with it; • d. the pool shall furnish to the Investment Officer monthly reports that contain the information required by Section 2256.016° of the Texas Government Code; e. the pool's investment objectives shall be to maintain a stable net asset value of one dollar ($1); r 7 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 • _ f. whose investment philosophy and strategy are consistent with this Policy and the City's ongoing investment strategy; and g• the pool provides evidence of credit rating no lower than "AAA" or "AAA-m" by at least one nationally recognized credit rating service. B. Unauthorized Investments. The following investments are specifically prohibited by State Law: 1. Obligations whose payment represents the coupon payments on the outstanding principal balance of the underlying mortgage-backed security collateral and pays no principal. 2. Obligations whose payment represents the principal stream of cash flow from the underlying mortgage-backed security collateral and bears no interest. 3. Collateralized mortgage obligations that have a stated final maturity date of greater than 10 years. 4. Collateralized mortgage obligations the interest rate of which is determined by an index that adjusts opposite to the changes in a market index. VI. SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY A. Collateralization. Consistent with the requirements of State Law, the City requires all bank deposits to be federally insured or collateralized with eligible securities. Financial institutions serving as City Depositories will be required to sign a Depository Agreement with the City and City's safekeeping agent. The safekeeping portion of the Agreement shall define the City's rights to the collateral in case of default, bankruptcy, or closing and shall establish a perfected security interest in compliance with Federal and State regulations, including: 1. the Agreement must be in writing; • 2. the Agreement has to be executed by the Depository and the City contemporaneously with the acquisition of the asset; 3. the Agreement must be approved by the Depository's Board of Directors or loan committee, and a copy of the meeting minutes must delivered to the 11111 City; and, City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 8 • 4. the Agreement must be part of the Depository's "official record" continuously since its execution. Repurchase agreements must also be secured in accordance with State Law. Each counter party to a repurchase transaction is required to sign a copy of the Public Securities Association Master Repurchase Agreement. An executed copy of the Agreement must be on file before the City will enter into any transactions with a counter party. B. Allowable Collateral and Collateral Levels. 1. Certificates of Deposit. Eligible securities for collateralization of deposits , are defined by the Public Funds Collateral Act, as amended, and meet the constraints of this Policy. The market value of the principal portion of collateral pledged for certificates of deposit must at all times be equal to or greater than the par value of the certificate of deposit plus accrued interest, less the applicable level of FDIC insurance. 2. Repurchase Agreements. Securities underlying repurchase agreements are limited to U.S. Government, Agencies and Instrumentalities obligations, which are eligible for wire transfer (i.e. book entry) to the City's designated safekeeping agent through the Federal Reserve System and meet the constraints of this Policy. A repurchase agreement's security value shall be the par value plus accrued interest, and the security's market value must be maintained at the following minimum levels: Agreement Maturities Greater Than One Business Day U.S. Treasury Securities 102% U.S. Agency and Instrumentalities 103% Mortgage Backed Securities 105% Agreement Maturities of One Business Day All Securities 100% C. Monitoring Collateral Adequacy and Additional Collateral Securities. 1. Certificates of Deposit. The City shall require monthly reports with market values of pledged securities from all financial institutions with which the City has certificates of deposit. The Investment Officer will monitor adequacy of collateralization levels to verify market values and total collateral positions. If the collateral pledged for a certificate of deposit falls below the par value of the deposit, plus accrued interest less FDIC or other insurance, the institution issuing the certificate of deposit(s) will be City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 9 ® notified by the Investment Officer and will be required to pledge additional securities no later than the end of the next succeeding business day. 2. Repurchase Agreements. Weekly monitoring by the Investment Officer of market values of all underlying securities purchased for City repurchase transactions is required. More frequent monitoring may be necessary during periods of market volatility. If the value of the securities underlying a repurchase agreement falls below the margin maintenance levels specified above, the Investment Officer will request additional securities. If the repurchase agreement is scheduled to mature within five business days and the amount is deemed to be immaterial, then the request is not necessary. D. Collateral Substitution. Collateralized certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements often require substitution of collateral. Any broker, dealer or financial institution requesting substitution must contact the Investment Officer for approval' and settlement. The substituted security's value will be calculated and substitution approved if its value is equal to or greater than the required security level. The Investment Officer, or a designees, must provide written notification of the • decision to the bank or the safekeeping agent holding the security prior to any security release. Substitution is allowable for all transactions, but should be limited, if possible, to minimize potential administrative problems and transfer • expense. The Investment Officer may limit substitution and assess appropriate fees if substitution becomes excessive or abusive. E. Safekeeping. The City shall contract with a bank or banks for the safekeeping of securities either owned by the City as part of its investment portfolio or as part of its depository and repurchase agreements. All collateral securing bank deposits must be held by a third-party banking institution acceptable to and under contract with the City, or by the Federal Reserve Bank. The securities purchased under a repurchase agreement must be delivered to a third-party custodian with which the City has established a safekeeping agreement. F. Delivery versus Payment. The purchase of individual securities shall be executed "delivery versus payment" (DVP) through the City's Safekeeping Agent. By so doing, City funds are not released until the City has received, through the Safekeeping Agent, the securities purchased. The security shall be held in the name of the City or held on behalf of the City. The Safekeeping Agent's records shall assure the notation of the City's ownership of or explicit claim on the securities. The original copy of all safekeeping receipts shall be delivered to the City. S City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 10 VII. SELECTION OF BANKS AND DEALERS. A. Depository Selection. A qualified depository shall be selected through the City's banking services procurement process, which shall include a formal request for proposal (RFP). The City shall permit consideration of applications for a depository contract from banks, credit unions, or savings associations that are doing business in Southlake, and from banks, credit unions, or savings associations that are doing business in the cities contiguous to Southlake. The centralization of depository services is designed to maximize investment capabilities while minimizing service costs. The selection of a depository shall be based on the financial institution offering the most favorable terms and conditions at the least cost, while adhering to the guidelines and provisions within the request for proposal. In selecting a depository, the City shall give consideration to the financial institution's credit characteristics, financial history, service capabilities, and costs for required services. The City's depository contract shall be for three years with an option to extend for an additional two years upon mutual agreement of the depository and the City. Specialized services may be contracted for by the City with another fmancial institution or company if the depository cannot provide such service or charges more for the same service with little or no appreciable benefit. B. Investment Advisors. The City may contract with an investment advisor, who 411) shall adhere to the spirit, philosophy and specific term of this Policy and shall invest within the same "Standard of Care". C. Selection of Investment Broker/Dealers and Advisors. Selection will be performed by the Investment Officer, with ratification and approval by the City Council. Selected Investment Advisors and Broker/Dealers shall provide timely transaction confirmations and monthly portfolio reports. Prospective Broker/Dealers shall provide financial and other information as requested by the Investment Officer sufficient to evaluate their fiscal condition and ability to service the City. The Investment Officer will establish criteria to evaluate Investment Advisors and Broker/Dealers, including: 1. Adherence to the City's policies and strategies, 2. Investment performance and transaction pricing within accepted risk constraints, 3. Responsiveness to the City's request for services, information and open communication, • City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 11 • 4. Understanding of the inherent fiduciary responsibility of investing public funds, and 5. Similarity in philosophy and strategy with the City's objectives. D. Approved Broker/Dealers and Investment Advisors. Broker/Dealers and Investment Advisors eligible to transact investment business with the City shall be presented a written copy of this Investment Policy. Additionally, the registered principal of the business organization seeking to transact investment business shall execute a Certification as shown in Appendix "A", or a Certification similar in form, to the effect that the registered principal has: 1. received and thoroughly reviewed this Investment Policy, and 2. acknowledged that their organization has implemented reasonable procedures and controls in an effort to preclude imprudent investment activities with the City. The City shall not enter into an investment transaction with a business organization prior to receiving this written acknowledgment. 411/ VIII. REPORTING A. Quarterly Reporting. The Investment Officer shall submit a signed quarterly investment report that describes in detail the investment position of the City for the period. The report will include the following: 1. For each pooled fund group: a beginning book and market value; book and market value additions and changes; and ending book and market value. 2. The book value and market value of each investment at the beginning and end of the period by type of asset and fund type invested. 3. The maturity date of each investment. 4. Statement of compliance of the portfolio as it relates to the investment strategy. • 12 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 APPENDIX "A" CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have personally read and understand the investment policy and master repurchase agreement, (if applicable), conditions of the City of Southlake, Texas, and have implemented reasonable procedures and controls designed to fulfill those objectives and conditions. Transactions between this firm and the City of Southlake will be directed towards precluding imprudent investment activities and protecting the City from credit or market risk. All sales personnel of this firm dealing with the City of Southlake's account(s) have been informed and will be routinely informed of the City's investment horizons, limitations, strategy and risk constraints, whenever we are so informed by the City. This firm pledges due diligence in informing the city of foreseeable risks associated with financial transactions connected to this firm. FIRM REGISTERED PRINCIPAL OF FIRM PRIMARY REPRESENTATIVE: NAME/TITLE (please print) PRIMARY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE DATE City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 13 • • APPENDIX "B" GLOSSARY OF COMMON TREASURY TERMINOLOGY Agencies. Federal agency securities. Coupon. The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder Asked: The price at which securities are on the bond's face value. Also, a certificate offered. attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. Bid. the price offered for securities. CUSIP. A unique security identification Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers number assigned to securities maintained and together for a commission paid by the transferred on the Federal Reserve book- initiator of the transaction or by both sides; entry system. in contrast to a "principal" or a "dealer", he does not own or take a position in the Dealer. A dealer, as opposed to a broker, security. In the money market, brokers are acts as a principal in all transactions, buying active in markets in which banks buy and sell and selling for his own account. money and in inter-dealer markets. Debenture. A bond secured only by the S Certificate of Deposit (CD).- A time deposit general credit of the issuer. with a specific maturity evidenced by a - certificate. Delivery versus Payment. Delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the Collateral. Securities, evidence of deposit or securities. other property which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to Depository. The bank selected by the City to securities pledged by a bank to secure provide depository services. deposits of public monies. Discount. The difference between the cost Commercial Paper. Short-term, unsecured price of a security and its value at maturity promissory notes issued by corporations to when quoted a lower than face value. A finance short-term credit needs. Commercial security selling below original offering price paper is usually sold on a discount basis and shortly after sale also is considered to be at has a maturity at the time of issuance not a discount. exceeding nine months. Discount Securities. Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued at a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value, e.g., U.S. Treasury Bills. 14 City of Sou hlake Investment Policy-amended Match 4,1997 S Diversification. Dividing investment funds Federal National Mortgage Association among a variety of securities offering (FNMA or Fannie Mae). FNMA, a federal independent returns. corporation, is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United Federal Credit Agencies. Agencies of the States. It is a private stockholder-owned Federal government set up to supply credit to corporation. The corporation's purchases various classes of institutions and include a variety of adjustable mortgages and individuals, e.g., savings and loans, small second loans in addition to fixed-rate business firms, students, and farmers. mortgages. FNMA's securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FNMA assumes and guarantees that all (FDIC). A federal agency that insures bank security holders will receive timely payment deposits, currently $100,000 per deposit. of principal and interest. Federal Funds Rate. The rate of interest at Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). which Federal funds are traded. This rate is Consists of seven members of the Federal currently set by the Federal Reserve through Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal open-market operations. Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). Created permanent member while the other in 1932, this system consists of 12 regional Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The S banks, which are owned by private member Committee periodically meets to set Federal institutions and regulated• by the Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and - Housing Finance Board. Functioning as a sales of Government Securities in the open- credit reserve system, it facilitates extension market as a means of influencing the volume of credit through its owner-members in order of bank credit and money. to provide access to housing and to improve the quality of communities. Federal Home Federal Reserve System. The central bank Loan Bank issues are joint and several of the United States created by Congress and obligations of the 12 Federal Home Loan consisting of a seven member Board of Banks. Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation are members of the system. (FHLMC or Freddie Mac). A stockholder- owned corporation that provides a continuous Government Agency Issues. Debt securities flow of funds to mortgage lenders, primarily issued by government-sponsored enterprises, through developing and maintaining an active federal agencies, and international nationwide secondary market in conventional institutions. Such securities are not direct residential mortgages. Freddie Mac obligations of the Treasury and involve purchases a large volume of conventional government sponsorship or guarantees. residential mortgages and uses them to collateralize mortgage-backed securities. City of Southiake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 15 J1/9 S Government National Mortgage Association Master Repurchase Agreement. To protect (GNMA or Ginnie Mae). Securities investors, many public investors will request guaranteed by GNMA and issued by that repurchase agreements be preceded by a mortgage bankers, commercial banks, master repurchase agreement between the savings and loan associations, and other investor and the financial institution or institutions. Security holder is protected by dealer. The master agreement should define full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. the nature of the transaction, identify the Ginnie Mae securities are backed by FHA, relationship between the parties, establish VA or FMHM mortgages. The term pass- normal practices regarding ownership and through is often used to describe Ginnie custody of the collateral securities during the Maes. term of investment, provide remedies in the case of default by either party and clarify Liquidity. A liquid asset is one that can be issues of ownership. The master repurchase converted easily and rapidly into cash agreement protects the investor by without a substantial loss of value. In the eliminating the uncertainty of ownership and money market, a security is said to be liquid hence, allowing investors to liquidate if the difference between bid and asked collateral if a bank or dealer defaults during prices is narrow and reasonable size can be the term of the agreement. done at those quotes. Maturity. The date upon which the principal Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP). or stated value of an investment becomes due SThe aggregate of all funds from political and payable. subdivisions that are placed in the custody of - the a state managed pool, or other qualifying Money Market. The market in which short- pool(s) that meet state statute criteria, for term debt instruments (bills, commercial investment and reinvestment. paper, bankers' acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded. Market Value. The price at which a security is trading and could presumable be purchased Mutual Funds. Mutual fund providers are or sold. investment companies that sell shares to investors, offering investors diversification and professional portfolio management. Prices fluctuate with the performance of the fund. Money market mutual funds invest in short-term securities such as treasury bills, bank CD's and commercial paper: 0 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 16 \1L —/9 4, Open Market Operations. Purchases and Prudent Person Rule. An investment sales of government and certain other standard. Investments shall be made with securities in the open market by the New judgement and care, under circumstances York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by then prevailing, which persons of prudence, the FOMC in order to influence the volume discretion and intelligence exercise in the of money and credit in the economy. management of their own affairs, not for Purchases inject reserves into the bank speculation, but for investment, considering system and stimulate growth of money and the probable safety of their capital as well as credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open the probable income to be derived. market operations are the Federal Reserve's most important and most flexible monetary Qualified Public Depositories. A financial policy tool. institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or Par. The value of a security as expressed on compensating use or ad valorem taxes under its face (face value) without consideration of the laws of this state, which has segregated a discount or premium. for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its , Portfolio. Collection of securities held by an maximum liability and which has been investor. approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. Positive Yield Curve. A condition where S interest rates are higher on long-term debt Rate of Return. The yield obtainable on a securities than on short-term debt securities security based on its purchase price or its of the same quality. current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond or the Premium. The price that a security demands current income return. over its par value. This is the difference between the price of an instrument and its Rating. A formal opinion by an outside value at maturity (par value) when the price professional service on the credit reputation is higher than the maturity. of an issuer and the investment quality of its securities. This opinion is expressed in letter Primary Dealer. A group of government values (e.g., AAA, Baal). securities dealers that submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly Repurchase Agreement(REPO). A holder of financial statements to the Federal Reserve securities sells these securities to an investor Bank of New York and are subject to its with an agreement to repurchase them at a informal oversight. Primary dealers include fixed price on a fixed date. The security Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) "buyer" in effect lends the "seller" money registered securities broker-dealers, banks for the period of the agreement, and the and a few unregulated firms. terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. Dealers use REPO's extensively to finance their • positions. City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 17 _5�—ao • Safekeeping. A service to customers U.S. Government Securities. Various types rendered by banks for a fee whereby of marketable securities issued by the U.S. securities and valuables of all types and Treasury, including bills, notes, and bonds. descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for Such securities are direct obligations of the protection. U.S. Government and differ mainly in the length of their maturity. SEC Rule 15C3-1. See uniform net capital rule. Weighted-Average Life. The weighted- average life refers to the average amount of Secondary Market. A market made for the time that will elapse from the date of a purchase and sale of outstanding issues security's issuance until each dollar of following the initial distribution. principal is repaid to the investor. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Yield. The rate of annual income return on Agency created by Congress to protect an investment, expressed as a percentage. investors in securities transactions by (a) Income Yield is obtained by dividing the administering securities legislation. current dollar income by the current market price of the security. (b) Net Yield or Yield Student Loan Marketing Association (Sallie to Maturity is the current income yield minus Mae). A government sponsored entity that any premium above par or plus any discount provides liquidity for private lenders (banks, from par in purchase price, with the S savings and loan associations, educational adjustment spread over the period from the institutions, state agencies and-other lenders); date of purchase to the date of maturity of Sallie Mae participates in the Federal the bond. Guaranteed Student Loan Program. Uniform Net Capital Rule. Securities and. Treasury Bills. A non-interest bearing Exchange Commission requirement that discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury member firms as well as nonmember broker- to finance the national debt. Most bills are dealers in securities maintain a maximum issued to mature in three months, six months, ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to or one year. 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed Treasury Bond. Long-term U.S. Treasury to a firm, including margin loans and securities having initial maturities of more commitments to purchase securities, one than ten years. reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid Treasury Notes. Intermediate term coupon capital includes cash and assets easily bearing U.S. Treasury securities having converted into cash. initial maturities from one to ten years. Zero-Coupon Security. A security that makes no periodic interest payments but instead is sold at a deep discount from its • face value. City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended March 4,1997 18 City of Southlake,Texas IP MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public/Safety SUBJECT: Appointment of Three Reserve Firefighters for the Department of Public Safety, Fire Services Division We are requesting approval for the addition of three Reserve Firefighters to the Southlake Department of Public Safety, Fire Services Division. The following individuals have completed applications, testing and backgrounds meeting the criteria for a Reserve Firefighter position. Mike Simmons is currently in the Wylie Fire Academy and will complete his basic fire training this year. He currently is enrolled in the Emergency Management Program at the University of North Texas. His goal is to become a professional firefighter. Michael Wilson is enrolled in the Fire Protection Program at Tarrant County Junior College. He is S currently an Emergency Medical Technician and he will attend TCJC Fire Academy this year. His goal is to become a professional firefighter. Brandon Selman currently supervises eight employees at Walmart Inc. His interest in firefighting and EMS has inspired him to consider firefighting as a career. Each of these individuals are currently seeking higher levels of training related to fire,service and we feel that each of these individuals offer skills that will enhance Southlake's Fire Services Division. I am available for any questions or comments you may have. BC/bls,G y • 0 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT February 28, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-163 PROJECT: Second Reading / Ordinance No. 480-229 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Kimball Road Substation STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan of approximately 2.456 acres and a portion of Tract 3B situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. LOCATION: West side of Kimball Road and approximately 1,400'north of the intersection of State Highway 114 and Kimball Road. OWNER: TU Electric APPLICANT: Espey, Huston&Associates, Inc. - CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "CS" Community Service District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs).. NO. NOTICES SENT: Eight (8) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Earnest Taylor, 579 N. Kimball, Southlake, opposed. "The substation should be incorporated with the Timarron zoning change for the 200 + ac. since it will principally serve the development, and its presence will be compatible with the development." Three (3) responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • Lloyd and Dana Sherwood, 906 N. Shady Lane, Southlake, opposed. "We are strongly opposed to the office zoning and also to the power plant. Both will decrease our property value. Also the power plant will be an eye sore and health hazard." • Jeanne Cook, 158 E. Highland, Southlake, opposed. 11111 • "Power plant, transformer 76051, opposed. "A pow lines, industrial buildings, 6 story office structures." • Marla Looney, 2901 Tumbleweed Trail, Grapevine, TX er plant will lower property values for all homeowners in the Kimball Road area. It will be an eyesore and also can be a health hazard." City of Southlake,Texas • P&Z ACTION: January 9, 1997; Public Hearing continued to January 23, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. January 23, 1997; Public Hearing continued to February 6, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. February 6, 1997;Approved(5-2)subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated January 3, 1997; amending Item #4 (required bufferyards) to require the 10' Type `E' bufferyard along Kimball Ave., deleting the remaining bufferyards and providing a 10' Type 'C' bufferyard on each side of and along the length of the concrete drive; deleting Item#5B (minimum driveway centerline spacing); deleting Item #6 (provide a minimum of 3 parking spaces); deleting Item#7 (areas intended for vehicular use must be constructed of a dust free all weather surface material). COUNCIL ACTION: February 18, 1997; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 14, .1997 with Planning & Zoning Commission recommendations. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all items in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated January 3, 1997 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 14, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the • attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated February 28, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\M EMO\96CASES\96-163ZC.W PD • '� 20 . , • IVA pey, Huston & Associates, Inc. gineering&Environmental Consultants December 16, 1996 Mr. Dennis Keller Planning and Zoning City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,Texas 76092 Subject: Kimball Road Substation Site-Concept Plan Dear Dennis, TU Electric is requesting two variances on the concept plan; (1)Due to safety considerations the site will be graveled instead of providing an all weather surface on the site; (2)Minimum buffer yard, there will be an 8-foot masonry fence around the property which will provide adequate buffering and screening for the site. Other than these two variances this concept plan should conform to all other standards of the City of Southlake. Please note that the driveway leading to the site from Kimball Road is an all weather.road as required by the City's standards. At our meeting last week you and Karen ask why the wall is set off the property line. There are two reasons for this; first, a liability and safety issue,TU Electric wants to make sure that an individual would have to be . trespassing before they reach the wall; second, there is a slight grade difference between the site and the S surrounding property and the wall is designed to at the top of the slope to provide the maximum screening. Requiring TU to provide the required buffer yard would be a burden since in most cases it is only five feet,which would be difficult to maintain and it would also require extension of water to the site and its perimeter. Currently there is no need to extend water to this site. TU Electric, respectfully requests staff support of these variances and a favorable recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Once you have reviewed this application please call me. Sinc erely i ackson attachments cc: Mr. James R. Deen, TU Electric Mr. Ibrahim A. Hussein, TU Electric • REC'D DEC 18199 6 tt-J 13800 Montfort Drive, Suite 230 • Dallas,Texas 75240-4347 A PLANET PACIFIC COMPANY (214) 387-0771 TEL ■ (214) 387-9714 FAX Fr. fsrA}t . •ourt7r �',: :; 1421a2•L-._-. I ! 1ti _ �® --•-- -—UNINCORPORATED' L � RP I 2M Ik SA1 A � A _ ,BI 4.77 Ae 3 3.95 AA 2IN 4A IBIA6 1B1A IC rA .� r tt 3.32 Ac \ / -_ 299 Ac 14B1 4 •F1 181A7186 v\• i1 tlA r! i i i i Yy 2.64 ACt D1A,• B4501 : 7.-\'='-�,niAY it `\ !..�I •/ICIC /•• 40' TRACT MAP ./0011= -J L', '1 I MIN Z35:2 ram' M _._ _iz_ IECI�l.�1 . 7A . ! J 4 J 9 --. , — 1F r �e�'1. +'''� i 1 1Pt �YYa,: G 7, Ac 11312 ; lig 3 10.96 Ac 3A1F1 ‘ ,Rj 581A ,.�.r- 3AIG2 ;3A1E7 •� fY WM: . Pill 1 , 10 Ac �: 581 i tip' t 1 3A1G1 pS �0111, �. , ® '1Z 1D xr, I_+_D'L`r '------��., ( i i 3A105 3A1G `�A ` ®: `• i<11N /��j�`�_`�� ,il� j % /i 3.21 Ae 'Lie /` � 1EQ 4 .11 `i 1. tiw. i�' 321 Ac'� `4 3*16 7g 0 II 3B2 ..` , , , • / ; 1 l t• I ! ! r maks. oit �, ;s` .� ^`� ,yam ! \ 03 Ir tiO lfi !®®P _ rlr�•L I -i- K ip * _ I- o _ 1 g1J -a �•�.�. `� ' '`-`� 11 Ac SLIMY .4-1JIt f ® •J ~ ipN.1177r 1 i all IA • •j--- ---� >: TA , 3AIC2 5_-po _.. 15.56 Ac 12 Atli'®, .I" l��.V • 3A1C1 ©1'�� INSI1 .�•`, �E�� 3A1H22Y ,. 2G►, I. i4 !I�/��e1f11_1yI A D yM f 1i1 ! i i `� .L?�r -- 10.4 Ae 2F2A •tfft:r % ',;;� (111 D. `•� ii) gA11323�3A1H2At_� I i7 2F3 2F4A 2F4 Ac 113A JOH. N .-- 3A1D13A1H3 �•. ! ii 11I�' ' ' �Y e�'• 3A1H 3AIH1 •! 2E1 6.7 Ac `�ar:r:a,.v.: `F , .;'. .0i4 ENIE3)4 0 ❑ -GCJ.i.'• J� JAtA 3 3AIJ2 3AIJI A� .-------- ®rPillblik �•. '-'•1 • I L y� ♦P am4S> ' '� 3A,J4 B.13 Ae D 1�,tr.- 2A3 : 1 � /18.94 Ac § - --- THE :1.�v1 t� IG r._. a -•- SA1J3 _ .2 y iifi lgOAk •-�. ��. ;® i 3A1JIP--- - A A A ii 1 - ,• - __ EAST HIGHLAND STREET y 1 _Lr-r 11 _i 1 y F.,j, 1c1D1 1F 1F1pp! .• �• / tE 19 1 1C 2D ?f ' �. 4Y CAi�RJLL G.'I ES a i 2E - 1�/ T F I :\;1 I�Y:1; .10111•; t, 1 I.2E1 R1• S O i L i �\ W , SA1 ! ' 5C1 / 5:. ,....,..........E...:_ 101A -, 2J 2G r - ••' 1 102 A 1D2A I 2A�• -- ,y. >i75 Ac 5D2A /;� ''.5C1C 5C1H K u.� 1G 5028 r % �i-�'' i4 8.75 At , c ,Ea 7 � V SC1G2 Nr 'r -- 1 h 1A1 f• I L•] �•,� •.may A-481 7 \__ 1� .K.01 50 . ,Th 3,3Yi W16 ti. r jmunr.44..r.,.., ta �/� ,4-•/• 0 Yl1ON%I A F --Mr 011WI1V x SA4 ,m.. IFIEBEI-21211 2B4A :Lai v'J !/+ r 28 .2A 2 1 t 5A4An.,••+ 2B2 28 289 285 2810 284 rc '_ 3 5 sc, 5Q.-54t �7 j' .` 3p1 2D 2C 2L TN ff 2J 2P; $ �� .CITY zclE f' -- ., j(Jo '. 2&5 �;.q :.1 ,,4444 ' HALLill _...._,, _.. 15- _Q - 1 _ ••9_:::':IL ® [I 2E 20 ' 2R 2N • `I ;�A ,; o :•.i� \ ..2B1 •_ ••'b' _• j •- 584E 'V az t - 7: ..7 illi! ,., z':it -- :: !--- • ,_. •MMI4111/111110.7.1 Go_ _ , iz s ._.-, 5B2C i••Y Y 2A 15B� I v A SA 1 Ell�® Will _. ft) .. NORTHWEST PKWY EAST ....„ ..., ,c D, - FA t4•• -.J.--.-._.---.J ELF ; 1 Y sw i 1- 3D�•(FA, 1709) _ -- 2A2� A- -- .SAKE BEW. - S4} �- i I 4D I 7A-I I . I I l 1 I I2CI 'F --- 2B I .,•,. I -192 I, 19 1 1-1� _ J ,4> �,.r----- ------•y ADJACENT OWNERS : i • I TR 5A3A , TR 3C AND ZONING 3.75 AC 1 4.937 AC SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#6 \ , • • DOUG&DANITA FIERCE i ./ \. ./"="-:•- X-.4- I TR 5A3 ( /' I 4 AC / . . ( AG \ • - .i L. Rodgers ' I / I . .. \ _ E. Taylor I VP . ( SF-1A :- - ., 1 1 AG 2.0 . TR G. , . • -7 : 9 K. Smith Starkey AG ----- 1 MF-1 3" I co \R. 11 —PU D E.Taylor ( Vantil , - 1 6 , • I ,Stkc i 0 \ a) 1 u p k 0 V NCI Building Systems Z..' •,-r. 0 5 = SINI-S14 OP At- -0 0 , c SC sl 04 0 k TR 3A2 A S 1 09 v. ! .. 0 1 4 . 11,5 'I @• c 3 , 194 TB4 5ABC6 Z 1 i >- 3 • ,' A . .. . CC 2 CC • 1 . w m . . : 2 (`` k r1A- • . .. • • City of Southlake,Texas • • CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY •Case No: ZA 96-163 Review No: Three Date of Review: 2/28/97 Project Name:Concept Plan for "CS" Zoning Request - T.U. Electric Kimball Road Substations . being 2.456 acres situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey,Abstract No. 1049 APPLICANT; ENGINEER: T.U. Electric - ,' Espey, Huston&Associates;Inc. 115 W. 7th Street, P.O. Box 970 • 13800 Monfort Drive, Suite 230 Ft. Worth,Texas 76101-0970 • . Dallas, Texas 75240 ' - Phone: (817) 215-6315 Phone: (972) 387-0771 Fax: (817) 215-6274 ATTN: Lonnie Frazier Fax: (972) 387-9714 ATTN: Keith Jackson CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED•BY THE CITY ON 2/24/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. 'IF YOU HAVE ANY • QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, - EXT.787. • _ ...............................M ............ ..:....,..........•..:,....:w:::::::::..ng,...•:•:.g•:::;n.:.::r.:.......p:::::i+w:•:{?fi'iM{titiR :::::ENQ:•i?ii:::::::.•..:•::.ihi::;::::::.:..it:.:iii:::::i:::.iii•F • .1. Provide all required bufferyards. Required bufferyards are as shown in the chart on the plan. The • applicant has requested a waiver of the required bufferyards, with the exception of the 10' Type • - . `E' along the east property line adjacent to Kimball, and proposes a 10' Type 'C' bufferyard along • • each side of the 'proposed concrete driveway. (P & Z Action 2/6/97, C.C. Action 2/18/97: to • • require the 10' Type `E' bufferyard along Kimball Ave., deleting the remaining bufferyards and• providing a 10' Type `C'bufferyard on each side of and along the length of the concrete drive.) ' 2. The minimum driveway centerline spacing required is 250'. The provided spacing between the proposed driveway and an existing off-site commercial driveway to the south is approximately 100'. (P &ZAction 2/6/97, C.C. Action 2/18/97:. delete) . • 3. Provide a.minimum-of 3 parking spaces. (P&ZAction 2/6/97, CC.'Action 2/18/97: delete) 4. • All areas intended for vehicular use must be constructed of a dust free all weather surface material (i.e. concrete, asphalt, etc.). The applicant proposes gravel on the interior•of the site. (P & Z Action 2/6/97, C.C. Action 2/18/97: delete) • City of Southlake,Texas P&ZACTION• • • January 9, 1997; Public Hearing continued to January 23, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. January 23, 1997;Public Hearing continued to February 6, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. February 6, 1997;Approved(5-2) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated January 3, 1997; amending Item #4 (required bufferyards) to require the 10' Type E'bufferyard along Kimball Ave., deleting the remaining bufferyards and providing a 10'Type `C'bufferyard on each side of and along the length of the concrete drive; deleting Rem #5B (minimum driveway % centerline spacing); deleting Item #6(provide a minimum of 3 parking spaces); deleting Item #7 (areas intended for vehicular use must be constructed of a dust free all weather surface material). COUNCIL ACTION: February 18, 1997; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 14, 1997 with Planning& Zoning Commission recommendations. * Although no review of required interior landscape is provided at the Concept Plan level, staff strongly recommends that each lot be evaluated for compliance with the interior landscape area requirements per the Landscape Ordinance No. 544 prior to preparation of any site plans for the individual lots. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. •* . The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Final Plat must be . submitted for processing and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, along with the building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees. must be paid. This fliay include•but not be limited•to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter . Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will •. require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * North Kimball Avenue is indicated as an 84' R.O.W. which requires a minimum R.O.W. dedication of 42' from the centerline of the apparent existing R.O.W.. If the opposite side has already dedicated R.O.W. per the Thoroughfare Plan, this project should show a R.O.W. dedication which provides for the ultimate required 84' R.O.W.. . * Denotes Informational Comment cc: T.U. Electric Espey, Juston&Associates, Inc. L:\WP-FILES\REV\96\96-163.1 S . , • - . III ., .... . . . s • i . . . . . _ . . . • ... .. .. . . . . IOU ON 13315 rRUP6;EL66�ry SOO—Z96Z93 LOYD EDWARD RODGERS i.= •'O.-• __• ` O. ft. _ A 6296 0501 VOLUME 9667. PAGE 2300 (DRTCTI VI 6 S ., ,, L.U.D. mMll _ �. / II\II Y ' s,..2 3 ZONING=AG F �� Y ll �I Yca,RA CC 95• b rn< ^Ic 1 r ti� :I.6 ° f .. #Jsn str — '''" 6 f= E • 5tr A 20 0 �' r., ^ 4 R-----:. A, N ,ra, taZ ` 0 0 60 W i a c 3'6RICK r7L1 r r7aw:ur. l•0 •.t.rY SCALE: I.•20' J . g 3 W a a%?%l.a::l.]% 1..)%t:l.Pfil I:i;t.l;�%l. III' g\ �•st•a•`;.e•t:4ai:o-t•+:: f�i �f.l:rse.:.:%e•I !. .'In u:nl2 i 91•••4r••• I••••ano.et••„.[ml.:ii iii/ CONCEPT PLAN b .-..L.;.,...... .F[6rmmt.. ".::: :::: ' VICINITY MAPti i 916 NO scALE , FOR CS ZONING REQUEST _ - -• ;v \ jj • KIMBALL ROAD SUBSTATION Iiiii1"'EI \ 2.456 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN THOMAS MAHAN SURVEY ABSTRACT No. 1049 +'DARNED VIP: I `\ / '"A \\ ��- 1 I f A CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS I GRAVEL-" �•,.• •••i \ M� 54' ��0) FEBRUARY 10. 1997 � SURFACE tf.-• • \\ '„ Q�,P .. �t` • TU ELECTRIC • + % ��:- - I 0J ^ LONNIE FRAZIER-SITE PREPARER rat7i \ rayti 115 W. 7th STREET ry' �J 4'::' ,i-::.jX4 Iai iii I Y _ Q�O� P.O. BOX 970 iPP ta�67 e 1 FORT WORTH TEXAS 76101-0970 I Q�pr7� '-"I"•'� 1 tSP� iI • t C'J - 6��1 I.alt, ., �0�h'`�• VARIANCE REQUEST: tii i /\��'✓� rc POLE A r� .,� . m e ■` '� Q• / 1. GRAVEL SURFACE WITHIN SITE :�N 1 Asu ! / n_ / IN LIEU OF ALL WEATHER SURFACE -a-o n \ F"it,. � j I�"I�I ' / DUE TO SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS. 0:g o v i \ �,,,��.� l 1 __;_ LOYO EDNAR" 0.00GER6 =E \ I VOLUME,9667 PAGE 2300 2. 8' MASONRY WALL IN LIEU OF I • m i \ ,_„-0„may- e 1 ID' CTI REOUIRED BUFFER YARD. cc m ',IV I - `� 2.456 ACRES tT • � - _ zDN c-AG I gal o J \ 1106.970 6g. tr.a•j 4 . - U D. I $ so� J \ L.U.D. -sl j E I cclo I E c• ......� ) -... .. F `...1 I JI �— _ \ P'OP. ZONiNGCS r 1 �i ( III ,'LR - sl,r, I \ \ \ .%•,• •Y•,':„aj GRAVEL-� \ °str SEE... Y J, S.00.30.50'[. 226.29• i\ f}}f 11 SURFACE on k\\..; �J\ I•W.:.1 r.�.5�5fl:.l IIr SIG I ,\ ... 0J.\ \ i+. . . LAN. CAPE AREA MATERI I I a 4rjv0 \ \ C5 \ �i/ •'1 . BASED N TYPE 'C' BUFFER ' I kV z �viN�r \ \ RFOUIR ENTS. LENGTH OF EASEMENT - ;Il o N �I \ •7' \ y 110' TYPE 74 I I m` YY� IS BASED .F DRIVEWAY LENGTH. a. r+ rr� f I BUFFER VAR. �� .COIF v;;' �`o..\.......� ..._,..i.ro::::i:; 'I. \ - - f_gilki6uat Onl j. I I N o [-O _.:..a rT1111.:: .`(• s;:�;,-: •": I _ I I J m w • - ,; • is`;. •Ia:+ua�;...e y.;:1.r.;.,:,. I .1,_— - _ I i A. . ' O Q la`I'll':1'1`i`.i'' • ltia"LF:C' ia' cunG u_ 1 ' o I- II 'Gel[5'n • •\ [Ner[50E `I' I _it— CO = o '1' - ' i Le l� - •-- J e6rc..ai•• 6 i .- . . ,.e9 - V. �laE w O O +•6enO[O rIP[ OAI[ +•\Ot0.I6[ �•Ar �1:�I" I _ _ Z N� n LOT .. BLOCK ®' 5:0.:ART C®HAR3®6UFIE6®TAROS I l I I O N J " t~iPRf IBY PREL MINARY PLA 1 / ir°rrc'�x m' E.'9f�:il Ri'IJ<iRii�'tR'TlIPIIIT fir•,. J•• ,rr�v,wr —860 I t E.I.I. I u II CC CO I 4.• er.rn �'' , Mi0 Y:lLir" - MESCO B ILDING CORVOLUKE590. PAGE82 � �®oOm� POLE 1_ __ _•, . _ Ili I I i O _ (,RTCT 1 [s 6I3��.�3�tIM0�T•C•W. • 4 " n 1.0 D. =MR „",,,, ®®®®p® LOT I. BLOCK 1 \ 0.1� ll, I i w 2 c •?OWN• •• 11 PIID T . IZ 0�0 '`KIESCO BUILDING CORP. f�5 SS aT° =I;°s i — oo' i _ _ • CABIN �-se+Dca2.1z_ I.2 a i _ ,..r, ° ° !" . . , . . i Iw�l of II . iwn r . I 'iA'•'T - •�[it:F,rn"IrI r. - - I. - I.n.n. -Mu - '-- '---414INAT, ' — - rM, - :.inn.•ii.•i' ANNI1A. II PSN. . . 6.:.1•. 1.1 I I I I�I IN, A• A�i�ffi ,.. ,n r . ') -1i' 1•c-iiM1l[Ki pTlrNi � I o1Nl - - - ,1r_t._ I''.11J VIIW 6,.r,,,,..,.,^r., ,. ..... "".....,.....:.,.,,.,., REC'D FEB N �. 1997 I 1 E62962-005 • • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-229 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS • AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING • CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND . WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.456 ACRES, BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 3B SITUATED IN THE THOMAS MAHAN SURVEY, ABS TRACT NO. 1049,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING • CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING • THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; • PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its. Charter. adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, • WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-229.CS I P.4 Page 1 • producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effectpn the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the.City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public • necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their. original investment was made; and, - • WHEREAS,the CityCouncil of the Cityof Southlake Texas,does find that the changes in � zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts . of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally-classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts ofland are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed 0 and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately 2.456 acres and being a portion of Tract 3B, situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey,Abstract No. 1049,and more fully and completely described L:\CTYD OC S\ORD\CAS ES\480-229.CS Page 2 • in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "CS" Community Service District, as depicted on the approved.Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". .. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning neap of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and . all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. • Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. . They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable S consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. • That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. ' Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions'of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances S affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. L:\CTYD OC S\ORD\CASES\480-229.CS Page 3 1 K,.1.1 110 Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and • if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southiake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-229.CS Page 4 • ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-229.CS Page 5 ti-1 EXHIBIT"A" BEGINNING at a 3/4 inch iron rod found for the northeast corner of Lot 8,Block A of Briarwood Estates, Phase I,an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas as recorded in Volume 388-139, Page 7(DRTCT)and being an interior ell corner in the west line of said Rodgers tract of land; • THENCE North 00 degrees 33 minutes 10 seconds East,departing the west line of said Rodgers, a distance of 97.23 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for corner, THENCE South 89 degrees 30 minutes 50 seconds'East,a distance of 297.89 feet to a 5/8 inch iron - rod set for corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 16 minutes 22 seconds West,a distance of 220.02 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 30 minutes 50 seconds East,a distance of 226.29 feet to a 518 inch iron rod set for corner in the west line of Kimball Road,from which a 60d nail found for the northeast corner of said Rodgers tract of land bears North 00 degrees 01 minutes 14-seconds West,a distance of 748.89 feet; THENCE South 00 degrees 01 minutes 14 seconds East, with the west right-of-way line of said Kimball Road,a distance of 80.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the southeast corner of said Rodgers tract of land; *THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 50 seconds West,with the south line of said Rodgers tract of land, a distance of 522.22 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set for the most southerly southwest • corner of said Rodgers tract of land and being the most southerly northeast corner of Lot 7, Block A of said Briarwood Estates; THENCE North 00 degrees 33 minutes 10 seconds East,with the west line of said Rodgers tract of land and the east line of Block A•of said Briarwood Estates,a distance of 202.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,containing within these metes and bounds 2.456 acres or 106,978 square feet of land, more or less. • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-229.CS Page 6 r7A.14 1 es vI"3C • . . 11111 1111 C7 O n cn IV • a ] Co, • p 100'ON 13315 IRON;CLUBt« CD N O-Z96Z93 LOYD EDWARD RODGERS ''"'•[' ` wrc 629620501 1/40 VOLUME 9667. PAGE 2300 'Ii - w.o 7 (DRTn -I mle $ U y C l CA L.U.D.U.D. 51U r, �. 0 .5...1 n _ . \Sg ZONING=AG `I - m ol?�m n.ro.. r.rro.. r sr ro U "'n SET TI'ro'• r 5 T.P. wS is O 0 5.09.30'50.E. 297.09. I 10 0 20 10 60 •d` ~ 0' E 2 _1 BPICK vpLl rnaq.wt a• • . . . _ '�� •o.[ SCALE: 1' y0' g W S" V% \ 1 - gl �Pi ++; .1:t:1.4::1.J�:„.:...4...,.., g'in in Ill. 1• — I J W ` H \ s41. i a.fy:•H y:[I1.:�:.,'- rr;I �N4�_;1�f7;si1 I w O � O2 ...n..r. I.r �1'R��n n...n... P r ;;In•••••!"'•' .. VICINITY MAP CONCEPT NO SCALE PLAN t _ [i fi'.1111V' � FOR CS ZONING REQUEST ""E1 t4` 1 I KIMBALL ROAD SUBSTATION `` 3 \ � 2.456 ACRE TRACT OF LAND o'."© I ;, tt \ IN THOMAS MAHAN SURVEY ABSTRACT No. 1049 .'B2ATAO YIRa Y•--.. \ % I 'LCITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS .:1109 GRAVEL I.[�-i••i1--� \ C[' AC` .lEE FCIIT' SURFACE ?'�• I P�' FEBRUARY 10. 1997r\\ 't' . hJe`Q TU ELECTRIC POLE --� ti�ci.y .. LONNIE FRAZIER-SITE PREPARERfigiliIT `� JQ''> -J-::J..:.i 11� I 1 P��. 11 P0. BOX 970 W. 7th EET e I FORT WORTH TE%AS 76101-0970 '',p.4,C { " � i LPG f 8171 215-631 S a - //�� IIr �1� "' ++\ 0�Q�PP VARIANCE REQUE •ST: a P g.4 1-r-1 ` Jti s PRE GRA ynw,"' ...� �■ :� L bV v , SUR __ '°q.1b'A -`�PO 1. GRAVEL SURFACE WITHIN SITE ~ _° + / —g IN LIEU OF ALL WEATHER SURFACE 'y\ 3 i<.,I' h•i �r•�•' '.II DUE TO SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS. F. - o• - \ �,,,�..�,.[:,,� „ LOYD EDWAR. RODGERSaa e _ �I�..II o o I VOLUME 966? PACE 2300 a yV, • m i \ • 1 I I `�' I 2. 8' MASONRY WALL IN LIEU OF I w o z •�-••-'-i-•--•-d•.-i-- �.,� : L u- CT) REQUIRED BUFFER YARD. I iF` ez .p y z •� 2.456 ACRES z1' wsi \6p 3 ' o , 3 `\ (106.978 no.�ft.1......._..;yT: i ° �• �I 1 0l3 I J \ , d • ZONIN -AC 1=•i 24' 1 . I I _ g • yG J ' \ P'OP. 2RlING`CS! . 1 1 . �' S\�e•••••� 1 ,�I¢ �_ \ i:YrI is=i::ri 2Z I.R I sIN I \ _ \ \ ••V •♦ \•4'.'•:.;K GRAVEL-rr i \"''' \ 1 tt„.'1 SURFACE 5.89.30'00•E. 226.29' �'. ON I \ G,E mn a 1'\ \ •"'. ba�a•' LAN,CCAPE AREA MA1ERI L.5 I / slsuf • C'•�P`' \\ R8i I BASED• U TYPE 'C BUFFCI'GARE* �� I I'n``��r�• I \ I \, O' '- REOUIR MENTS. LENGTH Or EASEMENT G �G7 �\` ' __ •,'a._ _ ♦ * `�.+. - 15 BASED\QF DRI4E WAY LENGTH. _`- - 10' TYPE I I a \ \ •' •• I BUFFER YARR �?:' n -‘„ :.�,L`•:' - nmexcE o_i I I 1--LO - 4.�..�M=„fit+ :::-______________..--- - ��-li, . -:__ • w ,.,,,._ „..,__ ,.. .. I"iYa'Ct:f' I — —c�paiY — I- `, i zllo-, nma6e,E5nE5 ..,.. .... Icn�:1 p• --,-�.- .\ a �: B'BR¢I:rni `�\ EN,RpxcE �I i fl = p it I 1 _ _— ♦ ..�i �n. I're[.,a _ I e. I Z //( _��a11.99vu�auII �[fF[[ ' i.'r«[ ,\ ✓°''„ ...gil ,I WO O.'nu+ntnvlPl �I�\ '•M•n rnr _I i. feet[ . Pepmn rlll[,/ ' li�_ I _ ZN� ' 0- t UI :. RLOrs 1 �� SUMlexi CN•PI-BVEIERIAP05 •"• ''" I'0. wIP I UIBY PREL MINARY PL A/1 Ifir,�^•�•� nr _ii 1�•r«r I Ll a '�ME$LU UE ILUINL fUN _ lwo' •wraln _' l ) �,r� - S- rNet CC CO CCCOn .: ' VOLUME 5.98. PAr,F 8: wwr"'~ riu zro" ".,s [,unr �vs rrex[I a2i0�— \`/.✓/ — = tGRICII t.II O. MU —_ -- u • • .1gA'•wiow P0.F�— ,tE� w o 4 ll Y _ �—"ttwlile - -• �__I,_ \ 1 Ri :II.: . BLOCK I' o 111NIN: - II MID i��V'!__ '- � ° '°"[ —___ "— °s I - -3IL_-- $ —ram-__1:__ .i Koui MC[fN RIIII I/1Nfi GIIRP. It V M,. ROAM a n — I rnuYrn-I A. .1 NE 3ra: I J•a _ _ Ail '-;MIN In -i'T'T—_- E•-T[Erl"1•[ei TT- (.11.H. MII _ I[�v 1. - 1 11.1 No M+�•1Mn ,. 1.+..o�.rdii••• -I-~-' - _'-----"r[Iv[ver p .n �• 74 A i.. rA"r . s re 'inerti•aniflri 11111 Nr. II I.I. I _ ,r.r. • .•. :....n......,.I, ~: RECD F E B 'v 4. 1997 II E 67967 005 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT February 28, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-160 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-228 Rezoning/Lot 4,Aubrey Estates STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of Lot 4,Aubrey Estates,as recorded in Volume 388-142,Page 41, P.R.T.C.T. and being approximately 6.854 acres. LOCATION: East side of South White Chapel Boulevard and approximately 1,300' south of the intersection of Pine Drive and South White Chapel Boulevard. OWNERS: Aubrey L. Smith and Rosa Lee Smith APPLICANT: Interwoven Design CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORIES: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) NO.NOTICES SENT: Eleven (11) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Lenora Herron, 500 S. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, in favor. " . . . I expect this is what the Smiths wish to happen." • Mark Fowler, 410 S. White Chapel Blvd, Southlake, in favor. P&Z ACTION: January 9, 1997; Public Hearing continued to January 23, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. January 23, 1997; Public Hearing continued to February 6, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. February 6, 1997; Approved(7-0). COUNCIL ACTION: February 18, 1997; Approved (6-0) First Reading, Ordinance No. 480- 228. 1 PJ''\ City of South lake,Texas STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-160Z.WPD 5 V T i 1 i + r - - ,.iA E�`�, - 9 --1T_ -t--<. ,1. 2.•..fig --i j-1_—' —_•040._._._. r—r , • 3A1A �µt•Nµ- i 'i j )1 1 1 r !j `1 ` 1 Ii i` i e i k i i i i ! i i i ! i A 38 .:raou.:u avn { ..1 --v IH '— -- 1 1 Tt,..•-: I I` ! i----- •,�25 AC 14S . sn 0 1-(10 Et ice • f ''`'•. r�y 1 1`� IS 011 I. SC I Y \SE SH 301 a.A2 11 30 3A1 :4 ' ' - •s� ^ ,I< 1s 70 At 6 k 3 AC 451 Ac nl Ac 1 k " ! - "- - i © �Do P 1' r 7�•=/ ; 1 ,.1.„ �� •� Yr+ W% P. 15 Ae © Ei _ { . i; rz,,.4 MI s:„„Iy.�-• A �= \s i ®®' � ;, 2l3 2 liialliallig,SOH'"Nti. E _: �''- .- 11011111 �Ie. .., oR 0 ' •,.,calf` 28 aR'� ;o ff N r r a % kli 111.11E2 y �ice' :.��t53 � a �1 •� '- p1 � ,��. R�' � � ��`C t AG' _• I)Tlm r+10""17::,,,,ht'. .a ,F 28l za o ��3t Ill„ / i. (�. ® i cc-, g ,•e. 1.�i .i 1�`c 5 Ae © Ci0 {Ac S1}� © i 1 I p 3 ,e W _ .e, 1 Y I m A. ITT* l ��.. il f �►1/: 646421° 41-Filli Bull' 014 .J 4111 1/j 4Ac 4Ae r • `4 • ! j ! ..r ,• , i 1 j i / !i tc,. r �rllr��A�ll �r�it°Ni � ' I ' ,� a y j Ittt � nr W. y it ifr. , Wit. : i 6 Ae 1 58 . \ ..• • e 1:1 1 a� ailA ! 1 91' Ito i l l 1 1 1 5C _ j i 'C•n` �.�•r , • . . WINIto 1 i_ • in: ^ - PARK 14 Ac ! /rla' ru.%9911++►► 4, ! ! !_S"}Ar,T• .�. F � sig_ •Y- i i t ! vlitop .r it ac:.an:,iaa�.:: . i • ! no' 4-1 i lr8!rar,.r,., 1 �1 i� Iar:'.�; •�•�• 14. Y a • 'Mimi a I ern.. oss .� '%jj ! _:i :uKar,.....,,.� ?. 1! i i i i 1 tJ i ! i •1lTNCNi - - - - -- - - - ,_._ __,6 x ktiii in iiiiiii •, nmcanna► r-aa.ua:awaar" �a\ } , 1`1 ,}c�/ ! If r kt - 1 - i i i,�l�1 '` i, i i i i1• �. • L......, I°je , rM•a..r� ! y IS..enJ h - : / !. '.A:a ik r .' f:1�aaV 1 . i` r• \ -. :u:latl:z.1�n: `•... i1-l.' i i.,-- ., •.� y'• i Y""r -• J: Jraf , r •23.3 Ac 32113 Ac - x . t• 1; -I'- 4.- Iiii. _... cY r i i i ; 1A2' 1'ilillk.. Dt 6 1TRACT MAP 1 • 1 r i i--,-., % 1 �a � ADJACENT OWNERS \G°14 96a . yY41 - �.'� AND ZONING _ ► -. '� Cfl j' S j� • i SPIN REPRESENTATIVE#10 toTR314 o AC '� TR 3D1 j� f AL MORIN 1.0 AC no - 6f TR 3L j 8.31 AC . ti 'b F. 1 1 �j � TR 3D _ i v.Gash TR 3N ¢ � J 3.01 0 sa !410 � s AS TR 3N2 TR 3N 1 �rl r P�,,= s ?59 !. ) 1.5 0 It 1.0 AC .9 2 r TR ?A ( AG, f A. Richardson 5.�6. . .,,.... ,,, P a 1.0 A 4 . AG HS - n R 74• M. Fowler `06), •Gj �,-A ` gTR 2A1 i N G� DDj��`�; • % 1 �• A. Smith A sv- P 1 /IL . , .. : 0 i TR.M1 G. Davis ',,-; . - a. G . G• � ,. H. Kovarnik � f s Q ..., 31 G. Davis;. ... r • r+�� 1 INS �P P L. Herron C . iNE ACRES C AG i z. • TR 361 - 1.0 AC S ""'"'__ � •H. Kovarnik I W. LaFavers • ' _� a s T� A: • • '�Tj0 71 AG `' W. Anderson � � a • �� • `.,' NC SF-1 A• , 149 H. Kovarnik a, , P,.�E� 2.43 - CC 50' a1 • • - TR 4 �f/Z� a+ ,, 1.63 AC t{J i id - 2RS / CAMAf]1p Ipt,i ,A. . LOT 1 'I• 4• 11 ei�t• LOT 1 J �6. yh04c.LOT 1 \ 100 I- 100 300 300 Ik❑100 A I I f 1 Awentw MAW-ROT • LOT • •• •• 140�mS N.ORINBERRY NO.WI ADO. .L LOT 9 AM wwf -NwnINo.1L 4 1 wIIMiZ6rcu �J taY f 1,�k "TO AWOL 10180 L .tom I / /' MI MI 1[t D1RK IG tl q.N]l IOl NL DA.TCT. / . / awNM1 T.,It al+6 the I¢p ntOW¢ y /(• 1100®LIDD wI 22 IK]' rOI IC 1 BDew e c'IO..1m 48) ID1®w / ....._ .,mn . 1tlRAODt I.DN � 6 11p L Pa II.DITCT. • IDm,Nq n rm� / IOT 9.......,,• @ LOT 2 g 91619 BAT® w . CeTy'/ �w•IrYr .ar 1.LMIR R 1tl2•704 y w. w ' T1bA wwLnlaa, R7 AYtTW LMNnOR I p / S 10 II,OLMSGw.rm 1 • 6 Oa,I VMS 12]bt T Aa- aI set awn an. Of + D01104I1L TwwTaQ"] %• • ` `` 1e..1uo• 4433la®(PNCPOSED LOT W i $i x •ND,rt .;,. ZONI NG EXHIBIT $HGIf W G Y In YIO)I' Itl[OM i Tmran*, • I0— ew% / d1 .. .� -r.� LOT 4, AUBREY ESTATES i ,m„"°',,, '�,°p'IT�T• • VI AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAEE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS ��'"""�"` - scam AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 988-142,PAGE 41,P.R.T.C.T. �. � N OD7r001I 4axTr as PM j,.,DgD.T,mar T MIL Rol F"w^ EXISTING ZONING"AG" Rim Re D.CT",1a6 / LRwI1LaOtR Yw 1NM. LOT 1.KOCKA (PROPOSED ZONING SF1A) ADIL CHAPEL IIc[�POT MK M � w11.wz a TORS tl .NSTiTwl .I gLAYTYlS / . Y..O.,.T w,L.wla.=alDlta..l.114 / REC'D DEC 161996 DATIO TO L_UT T la - L �' --/6 O b1 DMItlw 11�.On O.Irma=um now ,�epT�r1.avt,n wv® ATM,. max. 110, I MIT Il Y 40084n wAArx.TAT,u /tllrrl qDN m Iw CAtIO IMP n RY/IIOY Y wrtD M0 i,w NlNlll atl OIwY/DYD' Y wlYifO. D[Q[iMT MEMO,w+nA.a {OMl�1-IwL1 MRatD FT COMMr DWTKAw • MO SOLI A A MI FOR FILING O RUM. ,Yllt 1' ICO 1111 - LIiNt DAV/D C. ARibr Y11' D •,„t1w, �1��1 p Surveyors, /ee. HOOT/AT i pp ,r KOLLR I a.Itf[0 AM,.K ATTILTI I Pafl C Mal a k TRW IT1 wFfl11 TirranIw. t11f lA,t 14-It-17Y 1w, n-I,.I I . i. ,i • :. .. .. .. ... .. .. • . • .. w • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-228 • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LOT 4, AUBREY ESTATES AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 6.854 ACRES SITUATED IN THE HIRAM GRANBERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 581,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; • PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS. CLAUSE;, PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan;and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person . or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-228.SF1 Page 1 ri tbr 6 r S facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parkingfand off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, _ WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public • necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, S WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic,and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, 0 is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 4, Aubrey Estates approximately 6.854 acres situated in the Hiram L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-228.SF 1 Page 2 q6'14, • Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein,from"AG"Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said.Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable Sconsideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of • . Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances • except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved a.s to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to S such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. L:\CTYDOCS\O RD\CAS ES\480-228.S F 1 Page 3 '1 6-11 , SSection 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: SCITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR , • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-228.SF1 Page 4 1 lb,0 • A 1'1'hST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • • L:\CTYDO CS\ORD\CASES\480-228.SF 1 Page 5 ��' • EXHIBIT "A" Property being described as Lot 4,Aubrey Estates Addition,an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-142, Page 41,Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 6.854 acres. • L:\CTYDOCS\O RD\CASES\480-228.SF 1 Page 6 76-10 City of Southlake,Texas I MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tom Elgin,Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP) Update Enclosed with this memo are the recommended revisions to,the 1991 Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP) map and text based on work sessions, joint meetings, and public hearings held by the Planning and Zoning Commission since the process began in the winter of 1995. Also enclosed with this memo are-copies of letters forwarded to the Community Development office concerning the MTP update since letters from residents were last forwarded to the City Council. Please do not hesitate to call our office (481-5581, Ext 753 or Ext. 866) with any questions or suggestions concerning the map and/or text at any time prior to the public hearing. Please place this item on the next City Council agenda for their consideration. TE/cic enc: Master Thoroughfare Plan recommended text,with summary and cross sections Master Thoroughfare Plan recommended map Currently adopted(1991)Master Thoroughfare Plan Letters from residents concerning the MTP update L:IWP-FILESIPROJECTSIMTP-96IMEMOSIPKT 0297.DOC s Executive Summary City of Southlake 1997 Master Thoroughfare Plan Update An amendment to the City Charter on January 21, 1995,instituted a required review of most master plan components every four years. The Master Thoroughfare Plan(MTP),adopted in December of 1991, was the "oldest" of the master plan components at the time and, 'therefore,was the first scheduled for review. In the fall of 1995,this process began,resulting in the selection of Lee Engineering,Inc.,of Dallas to provide the Planning and Zoning Commission and city staff with transportation consulting services.Larry Hoffman,P.E.,vice president of the firm,has since assisted in the analysis of land uses, traffic modeling, and level of service determinations necessary to produce the initial draft of the 1997 MTP update of the current December 1991 plan. The major difference between this plan and the current thoroughfare plan is the incorporation of the Trails System Master Plan, adopted in August of 1995. The trails plan calls for additional wider outside lanes for bicycles along thoroughfares and/or off-road trails parallel to one side of the thorougJhfares. The other significant differences are the number of proposed lanes on certain thoroughfares. The thoroughfares with proposed increases in the number of lanes are: Brumlow Avenue (from 4 lanes to 5)and Kimball Avenue between FM 1709 and SH 114(from 4 lanes to 6). The thoroughfares with proposed reductions in the number of lanes ate: E. Bob Jones (4 lanes to 2), White Chapel north`of Dove(from 4 lanes to 2),Kimball north of Dove(from 4 lanes to 2), Highland east of Carroll (from.4 lanes to 2), Highland west of Shady Oaks (from 4 lanes to 2),Peytonville from intersection of Peytonville&Southridge Lakes to Dove (from 4 lanes to 2),Peytonville south of high school(from 4 lanes to 2),Johnson Road(from 4 lanes to 2),Pearson south of FM.1709(from 4 lanes to 2),Union Church(from 5 lanes to 2), Southridge Lakes(from 4 lanes to 2), Carroll from SH 114 to Dove(from 5 lanes to 3), and Continental from Davis to"new"Kimball(from 5 lanes to 3). The roadways that are on the proposed plan but were not previously in the plan are: T.W. King north of Bob Jones(from local street to 2 lane),White Chapel north of Bob Jones(from local street to 2 lane) and Byron Nelson Parkway (4 lanes.) The roadways that were previously in the plan but are not on the proposed plan are:Ridgecrest(deleted entirely) and Walnut Drive(south and east of East Bob Jones). At a public hearing on January 23, 1997, the Planning and Zoning Commission completed their review and formal recommendation of the MTP. LAWP-FILESIPROJECTSIMTP-961EXEC SUM.WPD ?cPc • THOROUGHFARE PLAN FOR • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS • JANUARY 1997 PREPARED BY: LEE ENGINEERING, INC. CHEATHAM & ASSOC. 5323 Spring Valley Road 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. Suite 230 Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75240 Arlington, Texas 76011 (972)701-9663 (817)548-0696 • Table of Contents 410 Page I Introduction 1 II Purpose of Master Thoroughfare Plan 2 III Development of Thoroughfare Plan 3 IV Level of Service Description 5 V Roadway Classification System 6 Basic Roadway Classification 7 Roadway Classification Definition - Discussion Freeway 8 Freeway Frontage Roads 9 Principal Arterials & Arterials - Divided & Undivided 10 Collector 11 Local Street- Commercial/Industrial 12 ® Local Street- Residential Street or Cul-de-sac 13 VI Evaluation of Existing Street Capacities 14 VII Determination of Future Traffic 16 VIII Recommended Roadway Network 16 IX Major Intersections 18 Appendix List of Tables Table 1 Comparison of 1991 and 1995 or 1996 Traffic Volumes 15 • I. Introduction • Transportation is the circulatory system of a city and the lifeline of the economy that carries workers and shoppers, raw materials and finished products to their destinations within the urban environment. As Southlake experiences increasing residential and commercial growth, transportation facilities and internal movement become greater concerns. Our ;society is dependent upon wheeled vehicles for the movement of persons and goods. Accessibility to industrial and commercial areas, residential neighborhoods, recreation centers and other traffic generators is essential. Much planning and study is done to create a transportation system that will move goods, services and people efficiently, conveniently and safely. In order to provide balance between related land-use activities, Southlake's transportation infrastructure must be planned to anticipate future traffic demand, minimize unnecessary traffic movement and establish a transportation system which adds to rather than detracts from the quality of urban life. The direct relationship between land use and transportation is complex; different land uses generate varied intensities of traffic that influence the demand for transportation systems, and transportation systems influence the development of land use activities. Recognizing this inter-relationship, there must be a coordinated, continuing and comprehensive effort in planning transportation systems and land use. Southlake is showing significant residential development trends at the time this report is being S prepared in 1996. Hundreds of acres of undeveloped land are either being turned into hundreds of residential lots or are on the subdivision drawing board. Substantial commercial and other types of non-residential development are also planned or under development. Southlake, therefore, finds itself at a point where its rapid suburban growth is creating strains on the supporting infrastructure. One of the most evident stress-strain relationships is associated with the imposition of dramatically increasing vehicular traffic on older, narrow roadways. Southlake is faced with the classic dilemma of wanting to preserve the narrow, tree-lined country lanes and to avoid the disruptions associated with the acquisition of additional rights-of-way versus an ongoing need to acquire right-of-way to accommodate the construction of wider streets that will ultimately be required as the city develops. Without debating whether or not growth is beneficial or should be encouraged, it is generally accepted that cities should plan for accommodating growth when it does occur. III 1 II. Purpose of Master Thoroughfare Plan • • According to "A Guide to Urban Planning in Texas Communities" publishedby The Texas American Planning Association Educational Foundation, the planning of thoroughfares is the process used by municipalities to assure development of the most appropriate and efficient street system to meet existing and future travel needs. The primary purpose is to ensure the orderly and progressive development of the urban street system to serve mobility and access needs of the public. Thoroughfare planning is interrelated with other components of the urban planning and development process. The thoroughfare plan is the municipality's adopted general plan for guiding thoroughfare system improvements, including the existing and planned extension of city streets and highways. The thoroughfare system is comprised of existing and planned freeways, expressways, and major streets and highways, which require wider or new rights-of-way and may ultimately be developed as four-lane, six-lane, or wider roadways. Roadway improvements may or may not include medians, depending on the city's thoroughfare development policies and standards. The primary objective of the thoroughfare plan is to ensure the reservation of adequate right-of-way on appropriate alignments and of sufficient width to allow the orderly and efficient expansion and improvement of the thoroughfare system to serve existing and future transportation needs. Some of the benefits provided by effective thoroughfare planning are itemized below: 0 • Reservation of adequate rights-of-way for future long-range transportation improvements; • Making efficient use of available resources by designating and recognizing the major streets that will likely require higher design of improvements; • • Minimizing the amount of land required for street and highway purposes; • Identifying the functional role that each street should be designed to serve in order to promote and maintain the stability of traffic and land use patterns; • Informing citizens of the streets that are intended to be developed as arterial and collector thoroughfares, so that private land use decisions can anticipate which streets will become major traffic facilities in the future; • Providing information on thoroughfare improvement needs which can be used to determine ; priorities and schedules in the city's capital improvement program and capital budget; and, • Minimizing the negative impacts of street widening and construction on neighborhood areas and the overall community, by recognizing where future improvements may be needed and incorporating thoroughfare needs in the city's comprehensive planning process. • 2 III. Development of Thoroughfare Plan • Outlined below is a summary of the process used to develop the Master Thoroughfare Plan: • The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public meeting to discuss with interested citizens the purpose and content of the 1991 Thoroughfare Plan. Public input was solicited by the Commission regarding factors to be considered in the 1996 update of the Thoroughfare Plan. • In order to determine the short-term impacts on the thoroughfare system, an evaluation was completed regarding land uses that were rezoned since 1991. Changes that were made to the Land Use Plan since 1991 and further changes to the Land Use Plan that are being proposed were evaluated for their long-term impacts on the thoroughfare system. • Several of the City's planning and regulatory controls (especially the Trail System Master Plan and the Southlake Corridor Study) were examined to identify any revisions that should be made to the roadway sections or right-of-way requirements contained in the 1991 Thoroughfare Plan. The driveway ordinance was reviewed with an emphasis on the required spacing of driveways. • The Thoroughfare Plans for the surrounding communities of Keller, Westlake, Trophy Club, Grapevine and Colleyville were evaluated for the need to revise the 1991 Southlake Thoroughfare Plan to provide compatible street cross sections where the streets interface • at the city limits lines. • Traffic counts for 1995 and 1996 were examined to identify any congested street segments that required short-term mitigation measures. The traffic volumes were also used as input to the travel demand forecasting model maintained and operated by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). • The NCTCOG model was run to obtain traffic projections on the city's major streets and highways for the year 2010. The 2010 volumes were then used to determine the projected traffic for the ultimate build-out (full development) of the city. Since the NCTCOG - model is of a regional nature, some of the projected traffic volumes were modified slightly to reflect local knowledge about land use, development activities, the character of certain roadways, special traffic generators, and local policies. • Utilizing the traffic projections for the ultimate build-out of the city, the proposed roadway network was developed to accommodate the expected traffic. As a general rule, the required street cross sections and right-of-way requirements were developed to provide at least a level of service "D" for the volumes of projected traffic. The required street network was documented as the 1996 Thoroughfare Plan. • Upon completion of the initial draft, the proposed 1996.Thoroughfare Plan was presented at a city-wide, S.P.I.N.-sponsored meeting for public comments and input. • 3 • The Planning &Zoning Commission conducted an initial public hearing on the proposed 111, 1996 Thoroughfare Plan. • In order to address certain concerns voiced by citizens at the initial public hearing, the Planning & Zoning Commission held a special Work Session. • The Planning & Zoning Commission, after a second public hearing, made a formal recommendation to the City Council. • The City Council adopted the 1996 Thoroughfare Plan. • 4 IV. Level of Service Descriptions • The term "level of service" refers to how well a roadway or intersection handles peak traffic volumes. The following are the standard or commonly used level of service descriptions. Level of Service Description Example A & B No delays at intersections with smooth progression Residential of traffic. Uncongesced operations, all vehicles or rural clear in a single signal cycle. streets. C Moderate delays at intersections with satisfactory Urban streets to good progression of traffic. Light congestion; at off-peak occasional back-ups on critical approaches. hours. D Forty percent probability of delays of one cycle or Secondary more at every intersection. No progression of Central traffic along the roadway with 90% probability _Business of being stopped at every intersection experiencing District at "D" condition. Significant congestion on critical peak hours. approaches, but intersection functional. Vehicles required to wait through more than one cycle during short peaks. No long-standing lines formed. SE Heavy traffic flow condition. Delays of two or more Primary CBD cycles probable. No progression. One hundred streets'at percent probability of stopping at intersection. Limit peak hours. of stable flow. Blockage of intersection may occur if traffic signal does not provide for protected turning movements. F Unstable traffic flow. Heavy congestion. Traffic Central Expwy moves in forced flow condition. Three or more cycles in Dallas to pass through intersection. Total breakdown with during rush stop and go operation. hour. Level of service "D" is the most commonly used design level of service for urban and suburban; areas. This means that `D" conditions will be experienced during A.M. and/or P.M. rush hours, but "C" or better during other times. The cost of providing a higher level of service for just those two periods is normally considered uneconomical. Thus, level of service "D" is the design level of service used in this report when making recommendations regarding ultimate street widths. As a practical matter, "D" conditions will only occur at very few locations for short periods of time during the next several years and should not be a general concern. • 5 7 ' V. Roadway Classification System The following is the recommended roadway classification system for Southlake. It is unique in that it addresses roadway nomenclature in a manner consistent with existing development policies and precedents. It is standard in that it is functionally consistent with classification systems used by other local, regional and state agencies. Following the outline of the classification systeir will be subsections on functional definitions and recommended design standards. It is important to note that the classification system includes roadway facilities under City jurisdiction and facilities under Federal, State, and County jurisdiction. These classifications are for the permanent or ultimate roadways. The City will acquire the full- width rights-of-way for arterials and collectors through platting. In many cases, developers will not build the facilities and the city will assume the responsibility of constructing or reconstructing the roadway. In a number of cases, the City will build a semi-permanent or interim street section. This section will generally have fewer lanes and will not have the same pavement section as the recommended permanent section. This interim section will be used for the life-cycle of the pavement or until traffic volume increases require construction of the ultimate roadway section. Developers constructing facilities within their development should be required to build the ultimate section(s) for facilities within their development. • • 6 � C' • Basic Roadway Classification • Types of Facilities A. Federal/State/County Facilities Freeways & Principal Arterials SH 114 Freeway SH 114 Freeway Frontage Roads FM 1709 FM 1938 B. City Facilities • Arterials - Divided & Undivided Collectors 41) Local Streets Commercial/Industrial Residential Street or Cul-de-Sac Not classified are urban expressways, access streets, park roads or other types of roadways that tend to be individually unique and should be treated individually. • 7 Roadway Classification Definition - Discussion • Classification: Freeway Function: Carry high volumes of traffic regionally and interregionally - Primary purpose is to accommodate what is normally considered through traffic Trip Length: Very long - generally in excess of five miles System Continuity: Connects to other freeways, urban expressways, arterials and major collectors Land Use Interaction: Should not penetrate neighborhoods or provide direct access from frontage roads Access Management: Access fully controlled Intersection Treatment: Fully grade separated Median Treatment: Barriers and/or generous median sections 8 Roadway Classification Definition - Discussion • Roadway Classification: Freeway Frontage Roads Function: The primary function-is to provide a means of connecting the local arterials to the freeways. They often perform two other functions -- often at odds with their primary function as a freeway service road. Those are: a. Arterial for local circulation. The drivers of many vehicles using the frontage roads have no intention of using the freeway, but are using the frontage road to go a short distance when a convenient city street does not exist. b. As a means of access to adjacent property. This is often unavoidable in that it is the only access-to the property immediately adjacent to the freeway. Development of the property with driveways is virtually inevitable. Frontage roads have been given their own category in order that they may be dealt with separately from freeways and 111 other streets because of their unique nature. Trip Length: Short System Continuity: Connects arterials and other streets to the freeway. Land Use Interaction: Should not penetrate neighborhoods. May provide access to adjacent property. Access Management: Limited access Intersection Treatment: At-grade Median Treatment: None 9 Roadway Classification Definition - Discussion Classification: Principal Arterials & Arterials - Divided & Undivided Function: Serves regional and major traffic generators and specialized land uses. Trip Length: Long - one to five miles System Continuity: Connects to freeways, other arterials, major and minor collectors. Land Use Interaction: Should not penetrate neighborhoods. Direct access to adjacent land strictly controlled. Access Management: Partially, but strictly controlled. Access spacing and design controls should be used to insure traffic flow and safety. Intersection Treatment: At grade intersections with separate turning lanes. Traffic carrying capability should not be limited by overly-frequent spacing of traffic signals and intersection access. 4111) Median Treatment: Left-turn lanes or bays'in medians Comments: The intersection of two' regional arterials may require grade separation to accommodate high traffic volumes. • 10 7C' 13 Roadway Classification Definition - Discussion • Classification: Collector Function: Serves local areas, minor traffic generators and neighborhoods. Forms connection with adjacent suburban areas. Trip Length: Generally under one mile System Continuity: Connects to freeways, arterials, and other collectors. May extend across arterials. Land Use Interaction: Penetrates neighborhoods Access Management: Limited regulation.. Design controls should be used to ensure safety. Can provide direct access to nonresidential land uses. Intersection Treatment: At-grade Median Treatment: None. Right-of-way and street section should be widened at major • intersections to allow for left-turn lanes with storage and deceleration lanes with free right-turn lanes. 4111 11 mac,- t(4/ Roadway Classification Definition - Discussion S Classification: Local Street - Commercial/Industrial Function: To provide access to adjacent property and to provide circulation within a non-residential development. Considers heavy truck use and considerable on-street parking of delivery vehicles. Some of these streets may be cul-de-sacs or related types. Those will have the same recommended right-of-way and paving sections. Trip Length: Short, generally less than 'h mile System Continuity: Connects to collectors and arterials Land Use Interaction: Provides direct access Access Management: Design controls to ensure safety. Intersection Treatment: At-grade • Median Treatment: None • 12 Roadway Classification Definition - Discussion • Classification: Local Street- Residential Street or Cul-de-sac Function: Provide direct access to residences and provide internal circulation within neighborhoods. Adjacent pedestrian movement should be considered. Trip Length: Short, generally 'h mile or less System Continuity: Should connect only to collectors. Direct connection between residential streets and arterials should be discouraged. Land Use Interaction: Provides direct access to adjacent property Access Management: Design controls to ensure safety. Intersection Treatment: None Median Treatment: None • • 13 �G� (6 VI. Evaluation of Existing Street Capacities • Traffic volumes for 1991, 1995 and 1996 at thirty-four (34) locations within the city are listed in Table 1 on the following page. The 1991 volumes were obtained from the 1991 update of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The source of the 1995 volumes was the City of Southlake's Traffic Count Book. The 1996 volumes were collected in April at locations for which there were no 1995 counts or there was a need to confirm the 1991 or 1995 counts. The 1991 volumes were compared to the 1995 or 1996 volumes to identify the short-term impacts of any major increases in traffic so that solutions could be recommended to mitigate the short-term impacts, if any. It is evident from the comparison that several locations have experienced significant increases in traffic during the evaluation period. From 1991 to 1995 or 1996, the traffic volumes at several locations increased by factors of two or three. However, the 1995 and 1996 traffic volumes on all of the streets are less than the theoretical capacity (10,500 vehicles per day) of a two-lane collector street in a suburban residential area. Furthermore, the 1995 and 1996 volumes on all of the streets are lower than the level of service D service volume of 8,400 vehicles per day (vpd). Therefore, there are no short-term impacts that need to be mitigated at this time. • i 14 Table 1 IIICom arison of 1991 and 1995 or 1996 Traffic Volumes P 24 - Hour Counts (Both Directions) 1991. 1995 1996 1. Kimball Rd. - north of 114, south of Shady Ln. 4,429 5,994 2. Kimball Rd. - north of Shady Ln., south of Dove 7,891 * 6,250 3. Dove Rd. - west of Kimball Rd.., east of Carroll 5,139 3,428 4,162 4. Dove Rd. - west of Carroll, east of White Chapel 2,810 3,130 5. Carroll - north of 114, south of Dove 3,241 3,272 6. Carroll - south of 114, north of F.M.1709 2,587 3,881 7. Carroll - south of F.M. 1709, north of Continental 2,981 2,115 2,615 8. White Chapel - north of 114, south of Dove 1,932 2,330 9. White Chapel - south of 114, north of F.M. 1709 4,285 5,346 10. White Chapel - south of 1709, north of Continental 3,907 6,722 11. White Chapel - south of Continental 3,219 5,824 12. Continental - east of Carroll, west of Brumlow 3,859 * 4,889 13. Continental - west of Carroll, east of White Chapel 1,754 3,607 14. Continental - west of White Chapel, east of Peytonville 2,028 * 4,093 0 15. Highland - west of Kimball, east of Carroll 1,497 2,439 16. Highland - east of White Chapel, west of 114 1,189 2,524 17. Highland - west of White Chapel, east of Shady.Oak 1,943 * 1,149 18. Shady Oaks - north of Highland, south of Dove 315 496 19. Shady Oaks - south of Highland, north of 1709 313 962 20. Peytonville - south of 1709, north of Continental 525 1,809 21. Peytonville - north of 1709, south of Ten Bar 1,532 2,194 22. Peytonville - north of Ten Bar, south of Woodbrook 926 * 1,014 23. Peytonville - north of Woodbrook, south of Dove 550 1,538 24. Dove - west of White Chapel, east of SH 114 575 * 1,941 25. Dove- west of S.H. 114, east of Peytonville - 1,540 3,408 26. Dove- west of Peytonville, east of Randol Mill 1,923 * 2,058 27. Randol Mill - north of 1709, south of Morgan 1,605 2,692 28. Brumlow - north of Hwy. 26, south of Continental 1,950 3,968 29. Continental - east of Brumlow, west of Kimball 1,600 * 4,224 30. White Chapel - north of Dove, south of Bob Jones 870 1,150 31. Bob Jones - west of White Chapel, east of T.W. King 200 * 32. T.W. King - south of Bob Jones, north of S.H. 114 250 547 33. Lonesome Dove - north of Dove, south of Burney 625 * 1,944 34. Carroll - north of Dove, south of Burney 425 4,870 3,358 * City of Southlake 1995 Traffic Count Book contains no volume for this location. • 15 -)C ' i f VII. Determination of Future Traffic • A three-phase forecasting process was used to determine the projected traffic for the proposed network of freeways, arterials and collectors. For the first phase, a regional travel demand forecasting model, which is maintained and operated by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) was used to develop the basic Waffle forecast for year 2010. The NCTCOG regional model has the capability to generate, distribute, and assign trips, and provides a mechanism to evaluate alternative land use and transportation systems. The model includes parameters and assumptions relative to population and employment, roadway networks, trip generation rates, auto occupancy rates, and mode choice (transit use). Since the NCTCOG model forecasts travel demand on a regional basis, a second phase of the forecasting process is necessary to better represent local conditions. Knowledge of local land use, development activities, the characteristics of certain roadways, special traffic generators, and local policies was used to refine the regional traffic projections to account for the local conditions in Southlake. In a few instances, this "focusing" of the regional traffic projections involved slight modifications to the model output. The third phase of the forecasting process involved utilizing the 2010 traffic projections and demographic forecasts to develop ultimate traffic volumes that can reasonably be expected on the • streets of Southlake when the city is completely built-out, that is, fully developed. Recent estimates by the NCTCOG indicate that by 2010 the City of Southlake's population and employment figures will be about fifty percent(50%) of the numbers that are anticipated at build-out. Therefore, traffic volumes at build-out, whenever it occurs, are estimated to be approximately twice the projected year 2010 volumes. Enclosed in the Appendix is a schematic traffic volume map showing existing, year 2010, and ultimate traffic volumes. VIII. Recommended Roadway Network A basic, understood, but not written policy is that the network of roadways that is to be the framework of any future thoroughfare planning in Southlake is to essentially take place along existing routes. That is, there is not to be a wholesale designation of new roadways on new alignments for arterials throughout the community. There are two sets of circumstances that might be considered as exceptions: 1. FM 1938 Extension. The cities involved and the Texas Department of Transportation O 16 • informally have long considered extending FM 1938 straight north from FM 1709 to SH 114 to be logical and essential. 2. The recommended network shows collectors in specific locations only along existing roadways. Specific locations for new routes are not recommended. The reason being that the location of these roadways is a function of the design of the individual developments. It is impossible to predict the design of these developments. The City should continue with enforcement of a general development policy that collector type streets be provided by new development at mid-points between arterials as a minimum. Otherwise, local shopping or similar trips will involve a two-mile or longer one-way, circumferential trip using arterials. Also, emergency, alternative routing for residents and public safety vehicles will be diminished significantly, if collector streets are not constructed. Enclosed in this report is a map showing the recommended network of proposed roadways. The map shows recommended roadways down to the collector level. Again, the locations of collectors along new alignments are not shown. The network shown is that which is anticipated to be needed to support ultimate development in Southlake and the surrounding region. The right-of-way requirements and roadway sections recommended are those necessary to support the ultimate development. With one exception, the ultimate roadway sections depicted on the Thoroughfare Plan are of sufficient width to provide at least level of service `D" for the projected ultimate traffic volumes. The one exception involves S Continental Boulevard between FM 1938 and Brumlow Avenue. The three-lane arterial proposed for this section of Continental Boulevard will operate at level of service "F" when the city is completely developed. However, sufficient right-of-way (either 84' or 94') will be acquired to accommodate a five-lane arterial (A5U), which will provide at least level of service "D" for the ultimate traffic volumes. The City has a policy of obtaining right-of-way for the ultimate need through the platting process, thereby preventing the necessity of having to buy the right-of-way at a later date. An interim roadway pavement section will probably be used within these rights-of-way for five or more years. The Thoroughfare Plan does not include a north-south arterial or collector in the area bounded by FM 1709, FM 1938, Union Church Road and Pearson Lane. However, when this area develops, a north-south street should be provided to connect FM 1709 to Union Church Road. The north south street should preferably be located approximately midway between FM 1938 and Pearson Lane. The new north-south street could be a typical residential street section (R2U) in a 50-foot right-of-way. 111 17 0 IX. Major Intersections ' The Thoroughfare Plan depicts the basic number of lanes that should ultimately be provided on the various street segments throughout the city to accommodate the expected traffic volumes when the city is fully developed. However, major intersections involving the state highways, arterials and collectors will require additional right-of-way to provide left-turn lanes (single or dual) as well as right-turn-only lanes. The Texas Department of Transportation will be responsible for the acquisition of the additional right-of-way on the state highways, but the City will be responsible for securing the additional right-of-way on city arterials and collectors. The City's Subdivision Ordinance contains a provision whereby the City can require, at the time of platting of a subdivision, that this additional right-of-way be dedicated to alleviate existing or potential traffic congestion at intersections where adjacent property is zoned commercial, industrial or other high- intensity use. The five-lane undivided arterials (MU) will consist of two traffic lanes for each direction of travel with a center, continuous two-way-left-turn lane (CTWLTL). At the intersection of two arterials, the CTWLTL should be replaced with a raised median with a left-turn bay. In-order to comply with the guidelines and recommendations contained in the Southlake Corridor Study, which was adopted in August 1995, the length of the raised median should be approximately 350 feet. Within the City of.Southlake, there are several,offset intersections (e.g., North White Chapel Blvd. at East Dove Street and South Carroll Avenue at FM 1709). The City's Subdivision Ordinance • contains a provision whereby the City Engineer may require the dedication of additional right-of- way to eliminate these offset intersections. Existing conditions permitting, the first plat filed on one of the corners of an offset intersection should be required to dedicate the additional right-of-way required to eliminate the offset legs of the intersection. Traffic signals will most likely be installed at the major intersections at some future time, when certain traffic conditions exist. These conditions, known as warrants, are defined in the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. However, for intersections involving Federal, State, and/or County roadways, the ultimate decision for signalization resides with the respective jurisdiction. Minimal negative impacts on traffic flow can theoretically be achieved when the spacing of major intersections permits efficient signal timing for the progressive movement of traffic. As a general rule, the optimal spacing of major signalized intersections should be one mile, one-half mile, or one-fourth mile. O 18 • APPENDIX Revisions to 1991 Thoroughfare Plan The City of Southlake's Master Thoroughfare Plan was updated in 1991. The process that was used to develop the 1996 update of the Master Thoroughfare Plan resulted in several revisions to the 1991 plan. The changes to the 1991 plan, and the reasons for these changes, are summarized on the following pages. • • A-1 III • IIII REVISIONS TO 1991 ROUGHFARE PLAN 1991 1996 Street Segment Classification Classification Reasons for Revision Applicable Roadways N/A N/A Incorporated Trail System Master Plan T.W. King Rd. - A4U C2U Trophy Club has eliminated one connection to T.W. King, North of County Line resulting in reduced traffic projections. Bob Jones Rd. - East of A4U C2U Ultimate traffic projections show the need for only two White Chapel Blvd. lanes. White Chapel Blvd. - Dove A4U C2U Ultimate traffic projections show the need for only two Street to Bob Jones Rd. lanes. Reduced traffic is associated with the elimination of the Trophy Club connection to T.W. King. Ridgecrest Dr. - North of C2U No Ultimate traffic projections do not warrant collector Dove Street Classification status. -J Kimball Ave. - North of A4U C2U Grapevine upgraded Silvercrest from a two-lane street to a Dove Street four-lane street. Wider Silvercrest will reduce demand on l Kimball. Two-lane collector is compatible with Grapevine's classification of Kimball. W Randol Mill Ave. - FM1709 to A7U A5U Downsized to five-lane roadway pending extension of North City Limits FM1938 by TxDOT. Peytonville Ave. - Dove St. to A4U C2U The expansion of Randol Mill Ave. from FM1709 to Southridge Lakes Pkwy. SH114 to a five-lane roadway (as shown in this Plan) or a Southridge Lakes Pkwy. - A5U C2U seven-lane roadway (if FM 1938 is extended north of FM FM 1709 to Pecos Dr. North 1709) will reduce traffic demand on these three parallel Peytonville Ave. - Continental A4U C2U street segments. Blvd. to Carroll High School A-2 • 110 • 1991 1996 Street Segment Classification Classification Reasons for Revision Highland Street - Shady Oaks A4U C2U Ultimate traffic projections warrant only two lanes. Drive to White Chapel Blvd. Highland Street - Peytonville A4U Unclassified Highland Street was replaced with a curvilinear residential Ave. to Shady Oaks Drive street through the Coventry Addition. Highland Street - Carroll Ave. A4U C2U Proposed large mixed-use development south of Highland, to Kimball Ave. will provide a major internal roadway that will roughly parallel Highland and intersect Carroll between SH 114 and Highland. Kimball Ave. - SH114 to A5U •A6D Ultimate traffic projections on Kimball between SH114 FM1709 freeway interchange and FM1709 warrant a six-lane facility. Existing right-of-way will accommodate a six- lane street. Johnson Rd. - Pearson Lane to A4U C2U 1991 Thoroughfare Plan showed no traffic projections for Randol Mill Ave. Johnson Rd. Ultimate traffic projections for 1996 update show the need for only two lanes. Two-lane collector is compatible with Keller's classification of Johnson Rd. Pearson Lane - FM1709 to A4U C2U City of Keller revised their Thoroughfare Plan so that Union Church Rd. Bear Creek Rd. will not tie into Union Church and Union Church Rd. - Pearson A5U C2U Pearson Lane will terminate at Union Church. These Lane to FM1938 revisions will create an L-shaped configuration for Pearson-Union Church for which two-lanes will be sufficient. • A-3 • • 1991 1996 Street Segment Classification Classification Reasons for Revision Old Carrol Ave. - Continental A4U Unclassified New Carroll and Brumlow will align at Continental. Old Blvd. to New Carroll Ave. Carroll will form a "T" intersection with New Carroll north of Continental. Future traffic volumes on Old Carroll will be low; Old Carroll will function well as a local street. Byron Nelson Pkwy. - FM1709 Unclassified A4D Byron Nelson is a new north-south street located between to Continental Blvd. White Chapel and Carroll. Continental Blvd. - FM1938 to A5U A3U Public input resulted in the reclassification of Continental Brumlow Ave. from a five-lane roadway to a three-lane roadway. However, sufficient right-of-way will be acquired for a five-lane street, if future traffic volumes warrant five lanes. A-4 6-Lane Divided Arterial (A6D) • 2' On-Road Trails, 6' Off-Road Trail F i-TIP 1 IT, L� _I L Io L C M �C� 12' -t 12' �I� 12',/ cl 2 TIC -� 2�2, 12 12 r 12 2� 2 2 4' 6' S' 42' 16' 42'** 9' 124' • LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway, T=Trail * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving,the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 6'narrower • •roadway section.• DESIGN ELEMENT - • STANDARD . Right-of-way width 124 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 6 - Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 6.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 300 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 34,800 vpd • . 5-Lane Undivided Arterial (A5U) 2' On-Road Trails, 6' Off-Road Trail P I ? 1CITI L� �o L e,a L � L o�e L �TICI P 2'2' 12 12' 14' 12' 12' 2'2' / • 4' 6' 5' 70'* 9' o C. 94' LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail • *Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving,the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 3'narrower roadway section. • DESIGN ELEMENT- STANDARD Right-of-way width 96 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 5 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 6.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 300 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume(Level of Service"D") 23,200 vpd • 72G , 9 ? 5-Lane Undivided Arterial (A5U) ® 2' Or'-Road Trails P iCT� L la L �r L I L w.f." iT�Cf P 2'2' 12 412 14 12' 12' 2'2' .I I, hail, .. 9' 70' 88 ' LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane, M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail • * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving, the integral concrete curb width is 0.5°, resulting in a 3'narrower roadway section. _ DESIGN ELEMENT - --'-'STANDARD Right-of-way width 90 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 5 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 6.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 300 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 23,200 vpd �7G 2-g 5-Lane Undivided Arterial (A5U) • Constrained R.O.W. - 2' On-Road Trails, 6' Qff-Road Trail T P CT L�a L �4 TCP J I, 12' 12' t 14' i 12' I 12' 2,1 I, 22 2' 6' 3, 70' * 3' 84' LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving, the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 3'narrower 411 roadway section. DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Right-of-way width 84 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 5 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% -6.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 300 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 23,200 vpd • 4-Lane Divided Arterial (A4D) • 2' On-Road Trails, 6' Off-Road Trail P I_ T rP FjT , L L, C M IC L IL ITIC P22' 12, 12 2' 2' 12 12, 2'2' 4' 6' 5' 30' * 16' _ 30' * 9' oo 1.00' LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median, P=Parkway, T=Trail * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and • gutter. For concrete paving, the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 6'narrower roadway section. DESIGN ELEMENT ' - STANDARD Right-of-way width 100 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 4 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5%- 6.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 300 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 23,200 vpd S -� L 3 4-Lane Divided Arterial (A4D) • 2' On-Road Trails P CT L I L IC M ,C� L L iTICI' P 0 2'2' 12' 12' 2 2' 12' 12' 2 2 ilia i, 9' 1.. 30' * 16' L 30'* 9' o 94' • LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving,the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 6'narrower roadway section. • . - .DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Right-of-way width 94 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 4 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% -6.0% • Minimum stopping sight distance 300 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume(Level of Service"D") 23,200 vpd • � G- 3t 4-Lane Undivided Arterial (A4U) • 2' On-Road Trails, 6' Off-Road Trail P T P CT - Lt et' � Pla , �-f - L � iTIC�py 1— hcl �� f 12 f 12 12 12 > 22 22 Po ### 4' 6' S' 56'* 9 o 0 80' 4 A LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail • * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving,the'integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 3'narrower roadway section. DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Right-of-way width 80 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 4 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 7.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 250 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 20,800 vpd • � c _ 39-- 4-Lane Undivided Arterial (A4U) • 2' Orl-Road Trails P CT L L L L _ I ITC P 12' �t� i2' " , 2' �� 12' 2' 2' 22 9' 56' * 9, a a 74' a • LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail *Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter.For concrete paving,the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 3'narrower roadway section. DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Right-of-way width 74 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 4 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 7.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 250 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 20,800 vpd 111 4-Lane Undivided Arterial (A4U) ® , No Trails r, P 2.LPlPtl1tlhlP 2. _ 9' 1 52' 1,. 9, 70' a LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail S * Please note that the above section is,shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving,the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 3'narrower roadway section. • DESIGN ELEMENT - STANDARD Right-of-way width 70 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 4 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 7.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 250 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 20,800 vpd III 7 6 ' 3`( 3-Lane Undivided Arterial (A3U) • 2' On-Road Trails and 6' Off-Road Trails P T 1 Pt D PT L L } L }T P D P T P { 1 I2i 12' I 14' I 12' 12i I I I I , 3' 6' 4' 8' 5' 1 42' 5' 8' 4' 6' 3' 94' • LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail, D=Bar Ditch • DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Right-of-way width 94 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 3 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 7.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 250 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. *Maximum Service Volume(Level of Service"E") 11,600 vpd • * Please note Level of Service will decrease from"D"to "E" for the section of Carroll between Hwy. 114 and East Dove 3-Lane Undivided Arterial (A3U) • Constrained - 2' On-Road Trails and 6' Oft-Road Trails - PT P D PT L } L L TP D P .T P t It 11,1 12' I 14' 1 12' t2 f ' t t 3' 6' 2' 8' 2 42' 2' 8' 2' 6' 3' 84' LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail,D=Bar Ditch IP DESIGN ELEMENT _ STANDARD Right-of-way width 84 ft. Traffic lane width 12 ft. Number of traffic lanes 3 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 7.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 250 ft. Minimum centerline radius 1000 ft. *Maximum Service Volume(Level of Service"F") 14,500 vpd * Please note Level of Service decrease from"D" to"F" for this section (Continental Blvd. 410 from Davis to New Carroll). 2-Lane Undivided Collector (C2U) III2' On-Road Trails, 8' Off-Road Trail Pi T ` 6 AT� L a�Q L 1TICI_ P 212' 16 16 2 2 4' 8' 5' I.. 40' * 9' 66' LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median, P=Parkway, T=Trail III * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving,the\integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 3'narrower roadway section. DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Right-of-way width 66 ft. Traffic lane width 16 ft. Number of traffic lanes 2 Design speed 35 m.p.h. • Grade 0.5% - 10.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 250 ft. Minimum centerline radius 400 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 8,400 vpd III 7c - 37 2-Lane Undivided Collector (C2U) 2' On-Road Trails, 6' Off-Road Trail P T P CIT� L � L TIC P • 2'2, 1 6' 1 6' 2'2' 4. 4' 6' 5' 40'* 9' 64' LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway,T=Trail * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paving with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving, the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 3'narrower 410 roadway section. DESIGN ELEMENT - STANDARD Right-of-way width 64 ft. Traffic lane width 16 ft. Number of traffic lanes 2 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 10.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 250 ft. Minimum centerline radius 400 ft. Maximum Service Volume (Level of Service"D") 8,400 vpd 410 2-Lane Undivided Collector (C2U) • 2' On-Road Trails P CIT, L �� T ICb P 2' 2' 16' 16' 2' 2' 9' 40 * 9' cd_ 58' LEGEND: C=Curb,L=Lane,M=Median,P=Parkway, T=Trail * Please note that the above section is shown for asphalt paying with a 2'wide concrete curb and gutter. For concrete paving, the integral concrete curb width is 0.5',resulting in a 3'narrower roadway section. DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Right-of-way width 60 ft. Traffic lane width 16 ft. Number of traffic lanes 2 Design speed 35 m.p.h. Grade 0.5% - 10.0% Minimum stopping sight distance 250 ft. Minimum centerline radius 400 ft. Maximum Service Volume(Level of Service"D") 8,400 vpd 31 • SOUTHLAKE-COVENTRY, LTD. 16250 Dallas N Parkway Suite 210 Dallas,Texas 75248 972-931-8971 Fax 972-931-8975 February 26, 1996 i Greg Last Planning Director City of Southlake Gentleman, Enclosed is an independent study for Coventry Addition. We would like to meet with you prior to the Council session to discuss the recommendations of this study. The bottom line is that the Coventry Manor Homeowners Association will be requesting that the thoroughfare plan add a connection between Shady Oaks and Highlands, south of Coventry and that certain recommendations be considered for traffic calming within the subdivision until this connection is built. ® trafficgenerated bythe new school and the possible addition of another school on The Peytonville creates a situation that needs immediate attention. Sincerely, ' D/ede a)? Dale Clark cc: Bob Whitehead P.E. Public Works Director City of Southlake r REC'D F E B 2 61997 S Anastasia M. Cameron Taxpayer Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Southlake, Texas. 76092 February 24, 1997 To Whom it May Concern; •It has come to my attention that even though you have received much negative input in reference to your Master Plans for the expansion of Continental. Blvd., into a five lane thoroughfare connecting to the new Heritage Park industrial development there is still a possibility that this may come to pass. Let me add my voice to those objecting to this plan. It is my opinion of my husband and I that a three lane street with 94 feet of right-of-way including space for a-trail system would be more than adequate for our present and future needs and would still maintain the integrity of the residential area along Continental. S In addition, we do not want to see Continental adjoined with the Heritage Park industrial g development located on SH26. We feel that Kimball Road would be a viable alternative to connect SH26 and 1709 and 114 and not promote industrial and commercial traffic through a residential street such as Continental Blvd. Sincerely, . -_:Ifita,c_e_..: eariaA.A.._______________ Anastasia M. Cameron 1000 Dominion Drive • Southlake, Texas 76092 76 REC'D FEB 251997 rots-i -7 f WED 02:50 AM P.01 • 400 St. Charles Court • Southlake, TX 76092.8570 February 18, 1997 The Honorable Rick Stacy, Mayor Members of the City Council Southlake, TX Dear Mayor Stacy and members of the City Council: I am writing to express my personal concern over the proposal to widen Continental Blvd. to five lanes and to connect it to Highway 26. As a resident of a small subdivision which opens onto Continental (the Dominion), I believe this would have a serious negative impact upon the quality of life we now enjoy. I understand that Continental Blvd must be widened to properly handle the traffic now using the road, and therefore I support a proposal to widen it to three-lanes with a 94'right of way, which would provide room for walking trails. Any additional widening of this street would be disastrous for those of us who selected this area of Southlake for its quiet and rural atmosphere. To extend Continental and connect it to Highway 26, through an industrial area, would only increase the traffic and make the situation much worse. • The master plan should consider the impact of major thoroughfares on the neighborhoods they traverse. We already have Southlake Boulevard and Highway 114 which run essentially parallel to Continental. I do not believe it is in any of our best interests to turn Continental into a heavily traveled commercial thoroughfare. Please consider the impact your decisions have on those of us who have chosen Southlake as our home. I understand that development is inevitable,and I appreciate the need for adequate roadways to handle the traffic. I simply believe that three lanes should be a maximum width for streets in an essentially residential area, and that we should discourage actions such as the connection of Continental to Highway 26, which will increase the heavy commercial traffic into our area. Thank you for your consideration. Sin e , Sharon V. Richar•.on • • REC'D FEB 2 41997 7U - 0 `) R. n 0 January 29, 1997 �le FEB — ti 1997 1._ - -_.s Curtis-Hawke - OFFiCE City Manager-City of Southlake MAN ' Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 • Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, I jiad‘tera , III - c-\-(3 • w 1 it L; FEB 3 --1997 iej' • January 29, 1997 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER Curtis'Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the • City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, Cd56- u(it 1L Lf n January 29, 1997 ��• �FEBEB3 -1991 � F Curtis-Hawke Crrl City Manager- City of Southlake MANAGER Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr. Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. • We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, A--aCke) Sa • 7 Ef P FEB - 61997 • January 29, 1997 I • OFFIC2 OF CITY MANAGER Curtis-Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan(`MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the • City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, 2ts • January 29, 1997 City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, • The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very trul urs, 949117 REC'D JAN 3 11997 -7�� ({7 • January 29, 1997 Curtis-Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 , Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register • opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, 2etori Tha Aza,c )fro-yol_o( U l qyg ) REC'D J A N 311997 • January 29, 1997 City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, �ty fvviw. r The undersigned are residents of the Mills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP')with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. ' We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development.of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, `27-4%ee frt(040 • EB 0 4 Ag97 „ „, January 29, 1997 iii 1 41997 aFMANA ERn Curtis-Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76992 . Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP”)with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly y s, • �v� • t1 ------____________"- aFE• B �January 29, 199'7 1 4I99 inVIF 7 . OFFicz OF CI1Y Curtis-Hawke . • MANAGER ' City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 . Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Mills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - - • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. .. i . • ;.. IE Very truly yours, ila-74.--44..._ Z,.,•Zi-tLrt-i-oe-X-, • S . -?L-Sf CE_ V 11 q„ 11111 January 29, 1997 [ F\ EB3l99jJ • RY City Council Member UFb�ANAGEZ OfR City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills ofMonticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. "Thl C1-9*- 0 (Venf,, p.(1-eA,tirt.en COeL-6.,t,-QAAA4. C\VC1 Very truly yours, \N,L0 111 "26-- 52- g Er. ig \,•\ January 29, 1997 FEB.3 -1997 • OFMANAGECITY City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Bills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended: The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to . residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Counci 's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, c • • . January 29, 1997 1991 5 OVEG.:0E CM Curtisilawke MANAGER City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Bills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan('.MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue,even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the 40 City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, `1fr /G- • 7tc 1-17r • January 29, 1997 FEB - 5 1997 CurtisHawke • ---� City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue,even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City CounciPs and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. II/ Very truly yours, Tont ear'Pant Hanson 1205 Wyndham Hill Lane Southlake, TX 76092 ' � tr � � 1� 15 • ` 4 • 1, FEB - 51991 • January 29, 1997 City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, ji;vvitc. 6,147 500 V(CILS 26- vg !Ito • January 29, 1997 111 FEB 51997 City C OFFICE OF CI,ouncil Member M,n,+;n„tR City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawks, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to .residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, 0Y/(,.ad / 304' e0/11eo•Z 4 - S,L_ January 29, 1997 % Fti8 991 Curtis-Hawke • City Manager-City of Southlake k`'— Southlake Blvd. . Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. •The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, it ;,I 1a s L \\ ill January 29, 1997 FEB 51991 OFcfi' F ` Curtis Hawke MANAGER City Manager- City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 • Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue,even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfiilly serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, kAro it40 Gym d% ill( lA) c�eci Gmke tb 7 L 09 • c �1 • January 29, 1997 '; t r FEBFE13 51991 City Council Member O;t;C`O}CITY MANtGER City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear ,• tc,G /` (Igyh L tu-d-) The undersigned are residents of the Frills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP”)with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, 70.0 Oc/7ce.,k5/44-7,e, 72 o.2_q6 • J January 29, 1997 i3 no\ FEB ' 51991 `i U . oRiCZ O CIS Curtis-Hawke Pei;-.r,v:.�t�% - City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake,Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue,even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letteito be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the • City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Soutllake. •Ve truly yours ze,ey4ca,- et_07 r • • • January 29, 1997 ‘ vs - 51991 OfEiG�G;0�v "" . Curtis-Hawke MpNpGtR City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master ThoroughfAre Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, cur votes in the next election will reflect the. City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. is _ h 4 , /4c v,4 . „ Very truly yours, /1,v) /45-- cz_ AV, 14,64,1,,-42-- ,r2cte-a- 2..ckier ciz.4 /WI f944r at"-cakc46474/ „Lip!, ifor4- aafst,, c-etct(04 „pt„a„ a �� ( { ,,A4 `t • January 29, 1997 II\ 51991 CurtisHawke -"` City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental. Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, S - � � �3 • January 29, 1997 '� ‹a <� Curtisllawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092; Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master.Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. S Very truly yours, (414,, 8rmv„._, "Pe (0`( 0l� S January 29, 1997 ' vg CurtisTlawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, • • January 29, 1997 n "IA \5 :1 \ \ F�a Curtisl-Iawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southiake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 ; Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Bills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan(`MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southiake. Very truly yours, ( D1 -. 2a1A4-4616,--L--71-- 7(P o J • \'I,. 0 January 29, 1997 . FEB -,51991 iC f' • plcFfC2�` CITY �- �" "Curtis-Hawke � City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 ; - Dear Mr.Hawke, ' The undersigned are residents of the'Rills of Monticello in.Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MT?)With respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to-live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. S Very truly yo .i i r F 1 I 7 I ‘(.. .e...7z--Z g' / 4.-Ze."67 Az_iiii/6 7 2/(i W7,(/ //cL LY(/. III '1G-47 D J t199� ., • January 29, 1997 FEBFHB - rsi Curtis-Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 1 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Bills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan(`MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, 5- 1)1Gi6S13L2 ► 111 v;:r.i IL\ io January 29, 1997 FEB • TY pFE1Cc 3r C1 MANAGER City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, (24 () roc-- (L'cci o T . DRvu ka-9.ea:0 ALA ` D,H vas 7 0 �% _Si(/4, ,f/)ii/t GI-. 3"0 L/4,ec, 7k ? 0 • f V 11 [1 II ! : • January 29, 1997 FEB - 41997 ;L°'j OFFICE OF CITY Curtis- Hawke MANAGER City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 • Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • _ The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, GG J_ r et S V \ EEB41991 \ January 29, 1997 City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear /`( The undersigned are residents of the Nils of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Ve truly yours, UV' FEB - 41997 January 29, 1997 j • OffiC7_OF CITY MANA City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr. Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • truly yours, --102 Pry v cQ Geo.( 2 i \S c d to t. L L ' '3 b �' ;• -January 29, 1997 FEB 61997 (RV_OF CITY Curtis Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the • City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. r Very truly yours, 4411447- ilkAY / CceV /i/14 .640 C 11 76,-73 • • January 29, 1997 , f .1 t FEB _ CDR Curtis Hawke _ OFFICE 13F CITY City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 • Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental. on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to . disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City.Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, AaLase4/..fr,d_,_ J72 ),,,kLe /6-2.(00-4 __ • • \lq • FEB ' 6195 • CHARLES H. YOUNG - Offit101:011 605 Potomac Place M„4L R Southlake, TX 76092 February 3, 1997 Mr. Curtis E. Hawk City Managaer - City of Southlake • Southlake Blvd. • Southlake, Texas 76092 ,% Dear Mr. Hawk: • • We are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake, and want to offer some information that has to do with the proposed upgrading of Continental Avenue. My wife and.I•have lived on this land since 1953. We have considerable interest in this proposal, and we are concerned that putting a major highway through here will be detrimental to our safety, quality of life, and property values. • The sketch below shows some measurements of West Continental as it is now, that the spaces between brick walls, brick to brick are: 90' 7", 91'3/4", and 95'll1", east to west. The blacktop through here is about 21' wide, and the inside clearance on the old bridge is 21' 3/4". To build a three or four lane highway through here with the reservation for allowance to change Continental to five lanes later on is not accept- • able. It worries us that it would be setting us up to have the -brick - walls torn down sometime in the future, and that commuters and traffic overflow from Highway 114 to Alliance and the new race track would add polution, noise, and danger to us. Our feeling is that we would have no objection to enlarging Conti- nental to three lanes, but there must be no concession that it'could ever be enlarged to five lanes. We are expecting our elected officials to represent our best interests when the Master Thoroughfare Plan comes to a vote. Sincerely, N ` • MONTICELLO TIMBER % c ESTATES LAKE i J l WEST CONTINENTAL AVE. 95' 11k" ,` 21' 3/4" 91'�3/4" Blacktop 2 21 ' 90' 7" Old bridge O 11111 HILLS OF MONTICELLO Thomas Jefferson /4r///4--- .statue nfl id:•iiiwD�'`� .) ' t. .7Z ? � .?i t ? i? �!`ii i "v2. i Y. .?YY.�. i i:` ` ? < t .2:,ja?'� ?:� �,Yij 4 .�, �; �nJiif�il��usiiiiii?iivsiYa�i' �, �i3�isi iiii3;�1;i`?ibi.?3:i3;i;i?av:;ih+h ii�iii:�ii�ts;, �3ii�`:::�_i? • 0 — , ;r0 ;I`l►'I,: FHB51997 :i_,i January 29, 1997 \k.. , T- -- L______2-1-.R - _ . •City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Frills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental • on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. _ We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to S disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, � E '� r:� ic I;,• fii L1t FEB - 51991 ill January 29, 1997 O<<la pF CITY igki,::),GE i CurtisHawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 • Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan(`MD?")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southiake. V-ry truly yours, 4LL 61-ybcittA.) • S \\tit\ 51991 4) January 29, 1997 C�v t3��t�itl�r�" City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, ( ti?e-4i A The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in South lake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MO")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly ours, • �L��B January 29, 1997 Curtis Hawke _- City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the]Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MT?)with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. X We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. r jai- 3 lam, hg►Tes Com_ CIEs Very truly yours, ,Z LPINTtka 120X03 A u( F A- MI(Jr Ae ice' ? ® . � C � 7� 411 January 29, 1997 - 7 FEB 5199 Curtis-Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Dills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan(`?dTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential.areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. S Very truly yours, ra jolakeak9--- • r � c- 5), g, E-r_Lio,.3_5751 January 29, 1997 g FEB — 51997 L 0 Of-igi of CITY City Council Member MANAGER City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be anienddd. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEVTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. S Very truly yours, r 1 /1A-- -( 4/k1.�vt---, .e1) o--0-4,- J 0 January 29, 1997 FEB - 51997 OFFICE OF CITY Curtis- Hawke - MANAGER City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfislly serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, cc � 7C -g)-- 17c- 4110 January 29, 1997 FEB' - 51997 1 City Council Member OFFiic ri7 it l,W CER City Council-City of Southiake Southiake Blvd. Southiake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, lLr> /"/-14'r s6" The undersigned are residents of the Trills of Monticello in Southiake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan(`.MTP")with respect to Continental • Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MEP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MI?on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, ../fa,zy /Ytit4tietisc.,/ • IIIiIiTII71111 January 29, 1997 FEB - 51997 ' I VFt1Le Jr CM CurtisHiawke ►;e„NAt;tR City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan C'MTP"1 with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MEP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Councils and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours, FEB - 51997 I_bi 3 41 January 29, 1997 Oft1L.2.} CITY MA YIJER Curtis-Hawke • City Manager- City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to.register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. S Very truly yours, f ti 5 v] \r1, 11 January 29, 1997 �1 _ _�j�9Z FEB Off*Of CM City Council Member MANAGER City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Tills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They,are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfiilly serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, W. Obt `7 U SU r 7O&) 1Z 6-- r J SC}or/-4 l-J iu� Tx -76 07 • - -,� ti 'AIL\ \ 0?;, - 519 3 January 29, 1997 pFEiC�3;C1� t:�isP:�tR Curtis:Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Bills of Monticello in.Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue,even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, • A1144'4) FEB - 51991 January 29, 1997 .41 OFEiC2.OF CITY MANAGER City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Bills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue,even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very triyours, /,, ii ge/: _mom 10 ,4 rv,,t.1 / ,4 5 v-ror the 76071 • .7? G- � O -( 199Z40 January 29, 1997 FEB waait Curtis-Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("'MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. • Very truly yours 9a 1, A 41Zys -1D-4(33,6A 2) /d OdtCOCL �� tall FEB - 71997 410 January 29, 1997 OFFICE OF CITY Q,,,�lAGER J Curtis-Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Ms of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. - The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. ;/10 Very truly yours, +(--1or. -7nov, —? ( --?0 Bi' '11 Li W P. ri:i'0 411 January 29, 1997 FEB - 71997 !L) OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER City-Council Member City Council-City of Southlake . Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Brills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan,("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue,even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. ir: il Very truly you 0 ( 1.) 1 . CiCk) 0 0,5 , • - , (4 i j te —�C % 7b 0 ---7C- T 40 January 29, 1997 1 I FEB 71997 j,j OFFICE OF CITY CurtisHawke - MANAGER City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 • Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Ifills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not,;our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. a Very truly yours, 111- V cr33i V§ January 29, 1997 F t Ii j E8 : I 1 7199 !L� Curtis Hawke IOFFFICE OF CITY ---I City Manager- City of Southlake AGER Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Ells of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, i F iP 'I ' 7 dipJanuary 29, 1997 J FEB - 1997 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER Curtis Hawke City Manager-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Kills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan("MTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Council's and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, 1' ti, r6i 0. ': Il � �. January 29, 1997, FEB - 71997 0FF1Cc OF CITY MANAGER City Council Member City Council-City of Southlake Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr.Hawke, The undersigned are residents of the Hills of Monticello in Southlake and wish to register opposition to the proposed Master Thoroughfare Plan(`IvMTP")with respect to Continental Avenue, even as proposed to be amended. The reservation for allowance to change Continental on the MTP to five lanes is UNACCEPTABLE. We would like this letter to be recorded officially. • The City Council and Mayor are urged to live up to their commitments and promises made to residents in the past with respect to.development of residential areas. They are urged to vote to disapprove the MTP on February 4. If they do not, our votes in the next election will reflect the City Counci 's.and Mayor's failure to faithfully serve the residents of Southlake. Very truly yours, City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 671, 2nd reading, an Ordinance adopting the Codification of Civil and Criminal Ordinances of the City to be known as the Southlake City Code. The City of Southlake Home Rule Charter, Article 3.15, Codification of Ordinances states: "The City Manager as soon as practical after the adoption of this Charter may cause to be. codified and properly entered and published for public distribution or for anyone desiring same, the ordinances of the City, which codification may be revised and updated annually." Volume I, General Ordinances, has been published and reviewed by staff and the City Attorney. Copies of the Code will be made available to the City Council upon request. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me or Kevin Hugman, Assistant to e City Manager. qs • o FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS 3400 BANK ONE TOWER S 500 THROCKMORTON STREET FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102-3821 TELEPHONE(817)332-2580 (800)318-3400 FAX(817)332-4740 ANALESLIE MLNCY February 6, 1997 Ms. Sandy L. LeGrand City Secretary City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Sandy: 0 Enclosed is the ordinance adopting the Southlake City Code. Please notice that Section 4 requires publication of the entire ordinance. This is a requirement of state law.- If you have any questions about the ordinance, please give me a call. Sincerely, Analeslie7 f:\fileslslakellettersVegrand.m01 0 „M d III ORDINANCE NO. 7/ AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CODIFICATION OF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY TO BE ICNOWN AS 1'HE SOUTHLAKE CITY CODE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING A CUMULATIVE CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.15 of the Southlake Home Rule Charter and Section 53.001 of the Local Government Code, the city has caused the preparation of a codification of the civil and criminal ordinances of the city; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. Adoption of a City Code. The codification of the civil and criminal 0 ordinances of the city, designated as the "Southlake.City Code”.and.consisting_of Chapters 1 through . 20, published by the Municipal Code Corporation, is adopted. The Southlake City Code is attached to this ordinance as Exhibit A, and is incorporated into this ordinance for all purposes. SECTION 2. Penalties. (a) Whenever in the Southlake City Code an act is prohibited, or made or declered to be unlawful, an offense, or a misdemeanor; or the doing of an act is required, other than duties of city officers and employees, or the failure to do an act is declared to be unlawful, and the act relates to fire safety, zoning, public health, or sanitation, including dumping of refuse, the violation of the , provision is punishable by a fine not exceeding $2,000. (b) When an act described in Subsection (a) is unrelated to fire safety, zoning, public health or sanitation and no specific penalty is provided, the violation of the provision is punishable by a fine not exceeding $500. • (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsections (a) and (b), when an act described in Subsection(a)is one for which a penalty is fixed by state law, the penalty for the offense is the same as fixed by state law. M • SECTION 3. Ordinance Records. The city secretary is directed to record the Southlake City Code in the city's ordinance records in accordance with Section 53.001(b) of the Local Government Code. SECTION 4. Publication. The city secretary is directed to publish this entire ordinance, not including Exhibit A, at least one time within 10 days after its final passage, in the official newspaper of the city in accordance with Section 3.13(b) of the Southlake Home Rule Charter and Section 53.002 of the Local Government Code. SECTION 5. Cumulative Clause. This ordinance and the Southlake City Code shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake except where the provisions of this ordinance or the Southlake City Code are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. Severability Clause. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the city council that the phrases,clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, Sand if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the city council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 7. Effective date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF . , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: S CITY SECRETARY slake ordinancecodadpt.ord (02/05/96) 2- SAPPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney DATE: • • sbkelordinancelcodeadptord (02 05 96) -3- ��^5 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT February 28, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-004 PROJECT: Rezoning/Concept Plan Harvard Square STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy,Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, Ext. 743 Please find the attached letter from the Applicant, Richard Meyers, requesting that the above item be withdrawn. • L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-004ZC.WTH • sitc'1 ) ,;:FROM : Panasonic FAX SYSTEM PHONE NO. : Feb. 26 1997 10:12AM P1 V T • Realty Capital Corporation Richard A.Myers President February 25,;1997 Greg Last City of Southlake Community Development Director 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,Texas 76092 Dear Greg: Please be advised that we hereby withdraw our re-zoning.request for Harvard Square. Thank you. Sincerely, Richard A.Myers 601 kacto--ct.,c /yr-- Lit 1/0e--( ( Put/l( ziej„..0 7 RECD FEB .261997 Ji 210 Park Boulevard,Suite 100,"Grapevine,Texas 76031 • (81'7)485-4200 • FAX ($1'1}488-5257 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 672, 1st Reading,Amending the Parking Ordinance This proposed ordinance is part of the ongoing process of updating our ordinances and repealing those that are outdated. It specifically addresses the city control of parking, access to and through streets, and sale of goods, services, or vehicles from the public right-of-way. The ordinance particularly addresses the following items: - Establishes penalties for blocking roadways and intersections. - Continues the Director of Public Works authority to establish no parking areas after study, and to post temporary signs or cover existing signs in emergency situations. - . Continues the practice of parallel parking in areas not otherwise designated. - Allows 45 degree angle parking in areas where provisions have been made. - Provides for restriction of parking at essential designated areas. - Defines offenses df leaving a vehicle unattended and parking in a fire lane. - Allows the Director of Public Works to supplement signs in certain areas with designation "TOW ZONE" and establishes conditions when vehicles may be towed and impounded. Brings our regulation regarding disabled parking into compliance with State law and establishes penalties for non-compliance. - Prohibits sale of goods along the shoulder of streets or right-of-ways if they are designated as arterial in the city's Thoroughfare Plan. - Exempts authorized emergency vehicles. - Repeals Ordinance 323 which dealt with disabled parking. We respectfully ask that Council approve Parking Ordinance No. 672 incorporating these changes. U/ )6- BC/bls g-ES'-r iORDINANCE NO. 61 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLA►KE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 323, RELATING TO PARKING REGULATIONS; ADOPTING CERTAIN PARKING REGULATIONS; PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF MOTOR VEHICLES IN CERTAIN AREAS; ESTABLISHING AREAS IN WHICH MOTOR VEHICLES ARE PROHIBITED FROM PARKING; ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING AREAS IN THE FUTURE WITHIN WHICH AREAS MOTOR VEHICLES WILL BE PROHIBITED FROM PARKING; PROVIDING _ FOR THE POSTING OF SIGNS IN AREAS WHERE MOTOR VEHICLES ARE PROHIBITED FROM PARKING; PROVIDING REGULATIONS FOR DISABLED PARKING; PROHIBITING THE SALE OF GOODS FROM AND UPON CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY; PROVIDING A PENALTY " • . CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • WHEREAS, the City of Southlake,Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the.Local.Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Southlake has determined that the adoption of amended parking regulations for the city is necessary to provide for traffic safety and to . protect the safety and welfare of the citizens of Southlake; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the solicitation of,or offering for sale goods on the public right-of-way along certain streets constitutes a traffic hazard and a threat to the safety of the solicitor and the travelling public and should be regulated; 1:\ClCs1slakAardinanae\parlcing(02/27/97) Page i 1111 111 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL,FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. Ten Feet of Roadway to be Left Available for Traffic A person commits an offense if the person stops, stands or parks any vehicle upon a street in such a manner or under such conditions as to leave available less than ten feet of the width of either lane of a roadway for free movement of the vehicular traffic, except that a driver may stop temporarily during the actual loading or unloading of passengers or when necessary in obedience to traffic regulations or traffic signs or signals of a police officer. - SECTION 2. Parking Near Intersections A person commits an offense if the person parks a motor vehicle on any public street closer than 35 feet from the intersection of the pavement line of such public street with the pavement line of the other street, such pavement line being extended if necessary to determine the intersection point. • SECTION 3. Prohibited For Certain Purposes • A person commits an offense if the person stands or parks a vehicle upon a highway, roadway, the shoulder or unpaved portion of the right-of-way,for the prncipaI purpose of: " (1) Displaying it for sale. (2) Washing, greasing, filling with gas or oil or repairing such vehicle, except repairs necessitated by an emergency. SECTION 4. Designation and Marking of Parking Spaces and Areas Where Parking is Prohibited or Limited (a) The director of public works shall conduct studies and investigations of the " public streets and highways within the city and shall study: Wilts (02/27/97) Page 2 • g- a -3 (1) the needs,of the public for parking vehicles on public streets; S (2) the width and length of public streets where parking is'desired; (3) the availability of parking space and frequency of parking on the public streets; and (4) the need to have regulated parking on the public streets. (b) After conducting such studies,the director of public works may designate those areas on public streets in the city where parking should be prohibited or regulated by imposing a time limit on parking,,or otherwise regulated. , (c) The director of public works or his designee shall cause spaces in which parking is prohibited or limited in time to be maintained and marked off or posted in and . on such streets and parts thereof as have been designated in accordance with this Section. All such spaces, places or areas shall be clearly indicated by appropriate signs or marking on the pavement. 0 In areas designated for time limit parking,the director of public works or his designee shall indicate such areas to be by markings or signs at both ends of time limit areas and at reasonable intervals between the beginning and ending of such time limit areas,with such • signs to indicate the time allowed for parking in such area. . (d) In an emergency or special situation, the director of public safety or his designee is authorized to: (1) post temporary signs prohibiting parking and (2) permit parking by covering signs which prohibit parking. SECTION 5. Parallel Parking (a) A person commits an offense if he parks a vehicle upon any street, except as otherwise provided in this ordinance, in any other manner than that the right-band wheels . of the vehicle are parallel to and within 18 inches of the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway. (b) A person commits an offense if he parks a vehicle on a one-way roadway,except f:\fiks\slaxe\ordinanoe\parkwg(02/27/91) Page 3 • 3- 0 -'1 • 40 as otherwise permitted in this ordinance, in any other manner than that the vehicle is parallel to the curb or edge of the roadway in the direction of authorized trdffic movement with the right-hand wheels within 18 inches of the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway • or the left-hand wheels within 18 inches of the left-hand curb or edge of the.roadway. SECTION 6. Angle Parking It shall be lawful for a person to park a vehicle at any angle not greater than 45 degrees to the line of traffic at such places in the city as the director of public works shall determine that angle parking shall be permitted and shall cause the same to be marked or posted and in all places where sidewalks have been set back and provisions made for parking vehicles.access of inside of the usual curb line on any street. In leaving said angle parking space, a person shall not back a vehicle into the traffic lane any further than . necessary to get straightened out and faced in the proper`direction for traffic between the space and center of the street. SECTION 7. Restricted Parking (a) No person shall stop,,stand or park a vehicle except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or to comply with the law or directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following places: (1) On a sidewalk; (2) In front of a public or private driveway; (3) Within an intersection; (4) Within 15 feet of a fire hydrant; (5) On a crosswalk; (6) Within 20 feet of a crosswalk at an intersection; (7) With 30 feet upon the approach to.any flashing beacon, stop sign or traffic-control signal located at the side of the roadway; (8) Between a safety zone and the adjacent curb or within 30 feet of a \Cctw\siakm\ocdinancc\P&ting(02/27l'97) Page 4 • place on the curb immediately opposite the ends of the safety zone, • unless the city council designates a different length'by signs or markings; (9) Within 50 feet of the nearest rail of a railroad crossing; (10) With 20 feet of the driveway entrance to a fire station and on the side of a street opposite the entrance to any fire sta.aon within 75 feet of said entrance, if the entrance is properly marked within a sign; (11) Alongside or opposite any street excavation or obstruction when stopping, standing or parking would obstruct traffic; (12) On the roadway side of any vehicle stopped or parked at the edge of or curb of a street; (13) Upon any bridge or other elevated structure upon a highway or within a highway tunnel; (14) At any place where official signs prohibit parking or standing; or (15) In any alley. 110 under (b) A person commits an offense if the person moves a vehicle not lawfully • his control into any such prohibited area or away from a curb such distance as is unlawful. (c). A person commits an offense if he parks, or permits to park a truck in.excess. of 1 1/2 tons according to manufacturer's classification or any truck-tractor, tractor, trailer- rig, trailer or bus on a street located in a residential area except for the time necessary for loading, unloading or the delivery of goods,wares and merchandise. This section shall not prohibit the parking of a motor home upon residential property. For purposes of this subsection, "residential area" means property zoned for single or multi-fanvly uses. • (d) A person commits an offense if the person parks a vehicle upon any public street•in the city.in the same location for mare than 24 continuous hours except when such vehicle is parked in front of and adjacent to real property owned by the owner of the vehicle, in which case such vehicle may remain so parked for a period up to 72 continuous hours. f:Mike\slake\ordinance\parking(02f17197) Page 5 • SECTION 8. Unattended Motor Vehicle A person driving or in charge of a motor vehicle commits an offense if he leaves the vehicle unattended without: - (1) first stopping the engine; (2) effectively setting the parking brake thereon; and (3) when standing upon any grade, turning the front wheels to the curb or side of highway. SECTION 9. Responsibility of Owner for Illegal Parking A person commits an offense if he allows, or permits any vehicle registered in his name to stand or be parked in any street in the city in violation of any of the ordinances of the city regulating the standing or parking of vehicles. SECTION 10. Parking or Standing in Fire Lane • (a) A person commits an offense if he parks'a vehicle within a fire lane which is marked in accordance with the requirements of Division 3 of Chapter 18 of the Southlake City Code. (b) A person commits an offense if he parks a vehicle in such a position as to block the entrance; exit or any part of a. fire lane which is marked in .accordance with the requirements of Division 3 of Chapter 18 of the Southlake City Code. SECTION 11. 'lbw Away Zones (a) In addition to signs regulating stopping,standing or parking of motor vehicles upon any public street or highway within the City of Southlake,the director of public works may supplement any such sign with an additional sign stating"TOW AWAY ZONE'. The • . use of signs stating 'TOW AWAY ZONE" or the like shall not, however, prohibit the removal by the city of any vehicle found in any area not so marked if the vehicle is parked \fifes\slake\ord nance\parking(02/27/97) Page 6 • (i.— 6 - 7 in violation of this ordinance and removal is necessary to address a traffic hazard. (b) Any unredeemed impounded vehicle may be disposed of as provided by Chapter 683 of the Texas Transportation Code. • (c) Any vehicle found stopped or standing or parked in or upon any public street or other public place in violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be deemed to be a nuisance per se,and a traffic hazard,and any such vehicle snail be removed in the manner and to a place as authorized by law. (d) Any vehicle,or any other property,found on any public street or other public place under any circumstances hereinafter set forth shall be deemed to be a traffic hazard . and a nuisance per se,and may be removed in the manner and to the place provided by this ordinance, provided, however, that such listed circumstances shall not be deemed exclusive or prohibit such removal in any circumstances not listed; (1) When any vehicle or any other property constitutes an obstruction to traffic by being left unattended upon any bridge,viaduct, or causeway, or in any underpass or tunnel; • (2) When any vehicle is found upon a street, or highway, and information • has been reported to the effect that such vehicle has been stolen in warrant on the filing of • a complaint; (3) When a vehicle.,is unattended and the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the vehicle has been abandoned for longer than 48 hours; • . (4) When a vehicle upon a street,or highway, is so disabled that its normal operation is impossible or impractical and the person or persons in charge of the vehicle are incapacitated by reason of physical injury or other reason to such an extent as to be unable to provide for its removal or custody, or are not in the immediate vicinity of the disabled vehicle; (5) When a police officer arrests any person driving or in control of a . vehicle for an alleged offense and such officer is by law required to take the person arrested immediately before a magistrate; • (6) When any vehicle is parked or standing in or on any portion of street, or highway, or along the shoulder or unpaved portion of the roadway, in such a manner that the vehicle constitutes a hazard, or interferes with a normal function of a governmental F:\Ctes\slake\ordinance\parking(02/27117) Page 7 • .. S agency, interferes with access by emergency vehicles, or by reason of any catastrophe, emergency, or unusual circumstance the safety of said vehicle is imperiled; or (7) When any vehicle is stopped or standing or parked in a manner prohibited by Texas law or by this ordinance,or when any vehicle is stopped or standing or parked in violation of any official sign or other traffic-control device where said sign or device gives notice of a tow-away zone. (e) Any vehicle which is towed or removed from any public street or public place pursuant to this ordinance shall be released to the owner thereof upon payment of all charges levied by the city or any private wrecker company employed for such purpose and upon presentation of proof of ownership of such vehicle by such individual. It shall be the responsibility of any person whose vehicle is towed or removed from any public street or public place to contact the department of public safety to determine the location of such impounded or towed vehicle. SECTION 12. . Special Parking fbr Disabled Persons (a) Authority to Designate.. The director of public works or his designee and any person who owns or controls property used for parking are hereby authorized to designate one or more parking spaces,parking area, or parking areas for the exclusive use of vehicles • transporting temporarily or permanently disabled persons as those terms are defined in Texas Transportation Code §681,002, as amended, and pursuant to said statute. (b) Designation of.Spaces. The director of public works or his designee or a person who owns or controls property used for parking shall designate the space,spaces,or area by posting in a conspicuous place signs that conform with the design and posting requirements of Texas Transportation Code §6$1.009, as amended. . Upon the request of the owner of any off-street parking facility, the director or his designee is authorized to approve spaces for the exclusive use of vehicles transporting disabled persons. The spaces shall be marked and sized at the owner's expense, in conformance with .the design and posting requirements of Texas Transportation Code §681.009, as amended. (c) C' pliajiceth State Law. All requirements of Texas Transportation Code §681.009 are to be complied with by the parties posting such signs relative to designation of parking spaces of the disabled and the posting of same. fAaes�slake\ordinance\P&°g(��) Page 8 0 , S (d) Vehicles to Display Identification. All vehicles parking in designated parking spaces shall display the special license plates issued by the State Department of Transportation pursuant to Texas Transportation Code 002.253 or a disabled parking placard issued pursuant to Texas Transportation Code §681.002. (e) a Violations - not transporting disabled_person. A person commits an offense if the person is neither temporarily not permanently disabled nor transporting a temporarily or permanently disabled person an.:' parks a vehicle with such special plate or displaying a temporarily disabled person identification card in any parking space or parking area designated specifically for the disabled. (f) Violation no plate or placard. A person commits an offense if the person • parks a vehicle neither displaying the special license plate nor displaying a disabled parking placard in a parking space or parking area designated specifically for the disabled. (g) Violation -blocking access. A person commits an offense if the person parks a vehicle so that the vehicle blocks an access or curb ramp•or any other architectural improvement designed to aid the disabled. (h) Penalty- first offense. An offense under this section is punishable by a fine of not less than $100.00 nor more than $200.00. • (i) Penalty- second offense. If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the person has been previously convicted one time of an offense under this section, the offense is punishable by a fine of not less than $200 or more than $300. (j) Penalty - third offense. If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the person has been previously convicted two times of an offense under this• section, the offense is punishable by a fine of not less than $300 or more than $400. (k) Penalty - fourth offense. If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the person has been previously convicted three times of an offense tinder this section, the offense is punishable by a fine of not less than $400 or more than $500. (1) Penalty - fifth offense. If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the person has been previously convicted three times of an offense under this section, the offense is punishable by a fine'of not less than $500. Wiles\sLikAordinance\parking(02127/97) Pate 9 i-e- lo • SECfON 13. Penalties, other than for Section 12 Except as provided in Section 12, above, any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined in a sum not to exceed $200.00, and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs. SECTION 14. Sale of Goods along Roadway A person commits an offense if the person sells, or offers for sale, any goods,wares, merchandise or thing of value, along the shoulder of any street or within any right-of-way for any street or road in the City which is designated as an arterial on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. SECTION 15. Posting of Signs Generally The director of public works shall, prior to the enforcement of any violation of sections 4, 11, or 12 of this ordinance prohibiting parking, cause to be posted a sign which ' • • shall be clearly visible to the driving public which prohibits parking at the particular location where such parking is prohibited and stating any hours of limitation of parking or any other special limitations for parking and stating, if applicable,that such area is a Tow Away Zone. Such sign shall be of a size,color and type of print and shall be erected at a height from the ground so.as to comply with all laws of the State of Texas and with all rules,regulations and policies of the City of Southlake. This section shall, however, not be interpreted to require nor is it in any way intended to require the posting of a sign of any nature for any parking prohibited by Section 7 of this ordinance, including warning signs that a vehicle may be towed away from any area described in Section 7. SECTION 16. Authorized Emergency Vehicles Excepted Authorized emergency vehicles shall not be prohibited from parking in any space or location which would otherwise violate any provision of this ordinance when such parking is incidental to and results from an emergency to which such vehicle is responding. l\61es\slate\ordinance\parking(02/27/97) Page 10 3, 6 SECTION 17. Should any section, subsection, clause or paragraph of this ordinance be declared or determined to be invalid or unconstitutional, then it is the intent of the City Council of the City of Southlake, that such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the remaining portion or portions of this ordinance, and such remaining portion or portions of this ordinance would have been passed and adopted notwithstanding the invalidity or unconstitutionality of the other portion or portions. SECTION 18. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such • ordinances are hereby repealed,provided however that Resolution 86-17, Resolution 90-77, adopted on November 6, 1990, and Section 18-84 of the Southlake City Code establishing parking regulations, shall remain in full force and effect. Ordinance No. 323 is specifically repealed. SECTION 19. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 323, or any other ordinances relating to parking which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to • such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending C\files\slakc\ordinance\parking(02(27197) Page 11 . in court or not,under such ordinances,same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 20. Effective Date and Publication This ordinance shall be and become effective from and after its passage and publication as required by law. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY • APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY EFFECTIVE DATE: L�Faes&slake\ordinance\parking(O2R7/97) • Page 12 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead,Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Approve Utility Easement and Access Agreement with Conner Lam to Allow a Right- turn Only Drive Access to Property at the Northeast Corner of N. Kimball Ave. And E. Southlake Blvd. Background Mr. Conner Lam owns the northeast corner of N. Kimball Ave. and E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). When N.Kimball Ave. was built, approximately one-half of Mr. Lam's triangular shaped property was acquired. Part of that acquisition included a provision that Mr.Lam's property,including that which fronted old Short Ave. since abandoned by the State of Texas,would have a driveway access to and from N. Kimball Ave. The requested easement is for the extension of a sanitary sewer to serve the new Liberty Bank. However, during the design phase of the sewer extension to the bank, the engineer discovered that the sewer that Primrose School constructed is at one point out of the easement. Therefore, the requested easement from . Lam is to provide the correct easement for the existing sewer and the proposed sanitary sewer. Discussion Mr. Lam's property is an odd shape with 61 feet of frontage on E. Southlake Blvd., 138.8 feet of frontage on N. Kimball Ave. and some on Bluebonnet Dr. The Driveway Ordinance requires a 500-foot distance from N. Kimball Ave, however, due to specific situations City Council and Planing Zoning Commission have approved variances from 200 to 250 feet instead of the 500 foot distance. The requested driveway is in the deceleration lane for the right-turn to N. Kimball Ave. The throat depth of the driveway will be dependent upon the site conditions and proposed use. The request right-in-only driveway for westbound Southlake Blvd. traffic will be similar to the drive off E. Southlake Blvd. to Texas National Bank. The difference in the two driveway designs is that Texas National Bank is a full access drive where Mr. Lam is requesting a right-in only. Traffic will exit from Mr. Lam's property on N.Kimball Ave. A properly designed, i.e., large turning radius and enough throat depth, right- in only driveway will provide a reasonable access to Mr. Lam's property. Possible Alternatives: • Redesign Liberty Bank sanitary sewer to flow north on Bluebonnet Dr. then west to McDonalds which would eliminate the need for the new easement;however,someone would 10B-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E.HAWK likAM EASEMENT , EBRUARY 28, 1997 PAGE 2 have to acquire an additional easement or move a portion of the existing sanitary sewer; or • "bore"the sewer under F.M. 1709 to an existing sewer; or • possible eminent domain proceedings to obtain the necessary easement. Recommendation Without a Traffic Engineering Study of this specific proposal, Public Works Staff would be.reluctant to • recommend this as a good solution. However, as compared to the similar situated full-service drive into Texas National Bank, a properly designed right-in only drive would work. Please place this item on the Regular City Council Agenda for March 4, 1997, for City Council's review and consideration. . IC1 :11-__ BW/ls •\W P.FILES\EA SEM EN'MA M.El EM • S 10B-2 y J fib'C , ,- h a,� I.13 �o COS �p O /c,y _ P09Q ,`�::• /�� T. :A ..... % ,c6 N.,. . Z % N N / F /Oi -57 �J�` • \��0 O ONE STORY �. / tP '. \00 �� i FRAME C J'•.. O0� �/ RESIDENCE 1 b9 I., s'�i .. e F a°, "mob•w'`oo° a)5\0 0O 20 01' a ,o°:' / . .. 00 0' , ' y0 , t la lS pE to Q r•Sj' a 9' / / .• �, �� DF;+ICATED FOR �`�„� •�p ��• _ Qp. t�2'�;� '�,•• ( 5 88° 45 25 W 36i 'ET R.O.W. BY 'LA LA , ` 6 ,. I.IR. FND. /�\� • Cl„rNER LAM 0�: ` ': 1 ' 1 (/2"I.R. �`r S 89° 0�( 25(( W VOL. 11T22, PG 403, l� • 10za ' FND. T. C D. R. CONNED (0.005 ACRE) -( 6'�•1 '� LAM '- c\J . -�Zt` `oDL. 6118 It> �; A• • 1 O i PG. 1155,� \ co ` - gj R D X T.C. 0 °� 'key � lcv . i..,c) 0 ,..../ , . ,- ,_ � .' ..e NEW) O Io _ ti. _ �iti p3,.2 a KIMBALL ROAD to -- 1� c:: � � 59 _ c)a (RIGHT-OF-WAY) . LtJ �.5a' :r��O2a�� to ST:4TE OF TEXAS p _ C �` ��' �; �, . VOL. 11501, PG. 1810 o r` to BELLE L/DSTER t T. C, D. R. 0 W .+- 1$� 0 1 . Z VOL. 1768 ^ ..�, 3 4g'3 ! 1n N PG. 84, \1-O sr_ si-4TT •72 8 , �- 00 0 T.C. D.R. TE OF. e Deec 6 ) • ''.I \ i 0) • (IyT00S ExA 9827 P 19�s8,� _t S, 5i8" I. R. 4 /o„w r• C.'0.R: 28e._�\-.Q2 > -- FND. - (N 750 PeR ��8 -� rT 9! f� 1 .�V 36' Deep 22T , LiHE C • ` �_.�� peR 2/ W ) 60. 99 r l� r; srQre 22 ` _• N. °eED J •69, �\`� „ . D . F• III "-------...„..., z3 r,..77,0 /oy . Qj _. crc,a.tJ.J J.I•1 ri I I Lisp=I bnaZ . UTILITY EASEMENT AND ACCESS AGGREINT STATE OF TEXAS • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT " That CONNER LAM, hereinafter called "Grantor", for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements for the benefit of Grantor and Grantee, pet forth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor and Grantee, does hereby GRANT, SELL AND CONVEY unto THE CITY'OfFSOUTIILAKE, TEXAS, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee", of Tarrant and Denton Counties, in the State of Texas, a permanent and perpetual non-exclusive Easement for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, altering, replacing, relocating and operating a sanitary sewer line and other public utility lines and appurtenances in, into, upon, over, across and under those two (2) tracts of real property situated in Southiake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows, to-wit: • Tract 1: Tract of land in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract 525, containing 0.0179 acres, described by metes and bounds on the attached Exhibit "A", and by graphic description on the attached Exhibit "B"; Tract 2: Tract of land in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract 525, containing '0.0125 acres, more or less, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds on the attached Exhibit "C", and described by graphic description on the attached Exhibit "D". In addition, Grantor does hereby grant, sell and convey to Grantee an additional Temporary Construction Easement contiguous to the North boundary of the above described Tract 2, as said temporary easement is described by graphic description on the attached Exhibit "D". Said Temporary Construction Easement shall continue until the earlier of (a) the date on which a sewer line and other public utilities is completed, or (b) one (1) year after the date hereof. Grantee shall have the right to excavate and fill, as needed, upon both the temporary and permanent easements granted herein, but Grantee shall replace any • UtilityEasement -and Access AgreementFage 1 1oB-a - -- _.. ... ..... nos • existing fences, improvements, or other fixturepermanentwithin or upon said pelent or temporary easements, without cost to Grantor,. and Grantee shall restore the p rY > • property as nearly as possible to its conditiun prior to entry thereon. Grantor covenants and agrees that Grantor Shall at no time erect, place or construct, or cause to be erected, placed or constructed in, into, upon, over, across or under said permanent easements granted herein, any temporary or permanent structures which would interfere In any manner with the full utilization by Grantee of the specified easements. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described easements, together with*11 and singular, the rights and appurtenances thereto, in anywise belonging unto Grantee, and its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does hereby bind himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and essigue, to warrant and to forever defend all . and singular the specified easement premises unto the said Grantee, its successors • and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming, or to claim the • same, or any part thereof. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, that as part of the consideration for the granting by Grantor to Grantee of the eases cents set forth herein., Grantor's •remaining property, when developed, and upon Grantor's request, shall be entitled to a.right-turn-only entry access, for use by traffic traveling westbound on FM 1709 (Southlake.Boulevard), said entry access point to be at the southernmost southeast corner of Grantor's property where Grantor's South property line joins the North • right-of-way line of FM 1709 (Southlake Boulevard), as generally shown by sketch on the attached Exhibit "E". Said entry access point Is in addition to.all other points of access now or hereafter available to Grantor's remaining property, including, but not limited to, access to and from Kimball Avenue set forth In a Dedication Instrument executed by Grantor. on August 12, 1994, and recorded in Volume 11722, Page 0403, Real Property Rec:urds, Tarrant County, Texas. • 11111 Utility Easement and Access Agreement - Page 2 10B-5 • IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that all of•the 'te1 s and conditions herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land, end shall be binding upon, and inure to. the benefit of, Grantor and Grantee, euid their respective heirs, executors, udadulstrators, successors and assigns. S'GNED this the day of February, 1997. Conner Lem, Grantor Accepted and agreed by the City of Southlake, this the day of , 1997. CITY OF SOUT!HLAKE,, TEXAS By: ...._. . •--- • STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT The foregoing document was acknowledged before me this day of 1997, by CONNER I,AM. Notary Public lb.and for State be Texas STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT The foregoing document was acknowledged before me this day of . 1997. by as of the City of Southake, texas, on behalf of said City oP Southlake, Texas. Notary-Public un and`for Stateli)f Texas SUtility Easement and Access Agreement - Page 3 •10B-6 - 4-3.sr-2-995 N w I. ENG. 403 PJ4 Ali $i '5% MIX • • ExamarT LEGAL DES4 HIP=4• • MING a tract of land situated in the SimnPl 11, 5 rvelrr Abstract No. 525, City of Suuthlake, Tarrant County, Tessa and being more particularly deaoribed an follows: asarlN NG at the intersection of the east line. of Zl*balk hoed (a 140 foot right-Of-may) and the north Line of southlahe Boulevard (P.A. 1709 - a 130 foot right-of . y)7 T Nee north 13 deg. 20 min. 06 sec. flrast along the east 114e of said limball Road a distance of 100.00 feet to h. point for corner; THEME South 22 deg: 17- mini. 42 sea. East a distance Of 77.06 feet to a point for corner; PCs South X3 deg. 20 mix. 06 sec. East, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point for corner in the north line of said Souttleie Boulevard, said point alio being in a cnrve to the left that hen* a centre' angle of 00 deg. 23 sin. 27 sea.-1 a rsdina of 11974.1i feet and a ,chord that bears Borth 76 deg. 21 m n. 31 sec. nest, =E$CE along the north line of said SonstAlaka $oelo+t'srd And Said curve to the left an arc length of 13.47 feet to the point of beginning and containing 779.9 square feet or 0.0179 acres of land. • • • 4. • • " 108-7 I LVIV.J 1. 4.141 J I'4 • r;0•. ..... n•' $7 • f w/8" STU80UT EAST • ':" / • Ji 7;11 s : _ k �/ . ,`A / C�� ter~ $TRAP. '�`� • `�� {SIGH 1R►Rp lott" 4.eit . L . 'Fr& . lejla S l 3 .00.00.000.0,zsolc67: ------- . • l Z ,,s / ***0. `� j v �/ STA. 8+87 LINE rd'.- j STA. 0+00 LIME p6N= 1/ STA. {}+00 ,LINE �C �(,{ OONST. .0 D�A.flROP M.N. rss ly • .. iii/ 02/18/97 17:20 CONNER LAM' ATIQ3V±Y out' • • David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc. Regiments! Professional 1 and Surveyors • • • Acreage David C.Moak.R.P.L.S. Texas • Neu•Mexico • Arizoltu - Nevada •Topography . Cnnsultnnt •Subdivisions • •Loan Surveys David W.Myers,It,l'.L•.S. •Invcstigativc Survttys President •Construction Layout 10 FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION AJ.1 that certain tract or parcel of land situated. in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, 'fEtrrant County, Texas, being a portion of the tract described to Conner Lam, • as recorded in 'Volume 8118, Page 1154, Dees Regards, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and hounds as follows: • BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch steel rod found at the Southeast • corner of said Conner Lam tract, also being in the Northerly • . right--of-way line of Southlake Boulevard (a 130 foot -wide right-of-way); THENCE Northwesterly along the Southerly boundary line of • sd.ira Conner Lam tract and said Northerly right-of-way line and a cutve to the lefL having a radius of 1974 .86 feet, a central angle of 00 degrees ' 55 minutes 04 seconds, an arc • length of 31 . 64 feet and a long chord of North 75 degrees 27 minutes 34 seconds West, 31.64 feet; THENCE North 45 degrees 23 minutes 54 seconds West departing • said right-of-way line 21 .71 feet to the East line of a Proposed Utility Easement to the City of Southlake; . THENCE North 00 degrees 03 minutes 30 seconds West at 13.10 feet East of and parrallel to the East right-of-way line of • Kimball Avenue and along the East line of said Proposed Utility Easement , 14. 06 feet; THENCE South 45 degrees 23 minutes 54 seconds East, 28.87 • • feet; THENCE Southeasterly 10. 00 feet North of and parallel to the • aforesaid Northerly right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard and a curve to the right having a radius of 1984 .66 feet , a • • central angle of 00 degrees 45 minutes 27 seconds, an arc length of 26. 24 feet and along chord of South 75 degrees 27 minutes 38 seconds East, 26.24 feet to the East boundary line of the aforesaid Conner Lam tract; ( PAGE 1 OP 2) • S10:i-It Bedford Rd. - Bedford.Texas 76022 6208 • Metro(8l7)268-221 I • Pax(817)282.0401 / r` Mm abcr Tow s of fiat',:..,.n.l tiuraey..a.4. ,..rtw�u Gunnies,urr Surveying&Mapping • J , REC'D FEB 2 0 1997 1013-9 el.Ci10,7( 1(:41 WIWYCK LH1'1. HIIUICT lOY t David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc. Registered Professional Land Surveyors ' li •Acrgage avid C.Moak,R.P.L.S. Texas - plow Mexico - Arizona - Nevada ■Topo6ralplay Consultant •Subdivisions •Loan.Surveys David NV.Myers,R.P.L.S. • •Inve I gative Surveys r'rC3idr:rtt •Construction Layout THENCE South 00 degrees 46 minutes 11 seconds. East along said boundary line, 10.39 feet to the pLace of beginning and containing 0. 0125 of an Acre of land, more or less, as surveyed by David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc. during the month of August, 1996. Job No. 96-198E3 .doc (PAGE 2 Of 2 ) . • • • • . • . __ c_ ,_______________ ,.. ,....„______ , .c.___) , . • t0J-B Bedfuld Rd. • Bedford,Texas,7(Y(J22•t3208 • Mora(817) 268-221.1 • Fax(817)282.0401 Member 1'd i.Son:jay of Pruressiun.d tiu,•cwn Si.AM OK:III Cvnyacs WI Sur.vYI,s aC Mar OS% • 10B-10 rxi toe r t r:ct LUNIVtK LH9, H I I UKI`rtY VielJ N a E-XLi1 1f 'D !'__ U., c, . 0 4- vUL.eaI IeJa I''C� . 1 t``' . 1).t- ' t. 1 <4. .-- -RN / \•.� mi t>;tto$.1 ki t esta ...i ---!L ,1/40s, .,..<7 7:!....4.:./Potp,,,..t.ar E le..1 Tc{,/j I° �"- 1 c)b o , 10. 9 - - 2t •71 �•Uo ' ' o4.- ' 'e"',C'E-vet.. j1Z 1�7�• l rouur� TE-t.1t'U>TAt?Y E coMi 1..- 7,1• 1 • a It rot u `--- G1�•N7 �T �?� vJ ��11.11,4ct4Gi 0 (_131/ f rLiL / l •\ !-+h-71 ' k—«L Y • ) I7LVV . . • -A-:- , r.„--,<,,,,,,,- (...1,,,,,,,, . . 0.0 1 2 AC1E- Or- 1.,., ;}1i' wGArc n to Yu c1AM L L L ErzL e-MAN a)11i:21-vt--( 1 1 i S z-_---7.-‘,k//A r.i • 1OB-11 \.I`nr)I Olt IISAS'.ti \11C INI• ...A r•ln•I `}/j • • f J - _ 4/4 • y MAF' OF TRACTS OF LAND IN THE• 1% , � SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY, : �r ABSTRACT NO. 525 g CtTY OF• SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS- ; 4rw . r ($EE ACCOMPANYING DESCO/PTIGNI •J NcJfr1 4• f • \ . 1 N..n.q.rmr."'..G.r•kod.a Mpd•Ir 1 al.,A IC•1•c'nna.mn.'.d•.. InM inAma.aC No tt * W,.tN[7 n .� ••f . t.,1a II.?1a.'d.•ad.•Ic.Hit Imes•to...n WWI //i/ �'1... / , :. Wail'.III.'a•J•ru.rNl In rFC I el.••1•�.•.NIII:A�lal•A.uW'1•1N• !Kiev lat.{tall Mlu4a fA��{{\('CMa!'1 f t;-,).- .4...Ia•I.1,•U•.1 I....I..4•..1 4 a•1 IA 1••.,1,44'1'ap u 44"41 1 d.. 1.MNlll.d.tint.►da vp.411(W 11.N:IN'f ho.•h.11.....1 1.4., 1..♦....k...el.,4..4.a,wyak awl. till KC 1..If.•4r.t.'I'c ol..:m I••d II.•I4P•a+1I�!I.r t_. +_ 11 3f,m.••1•••q:II.. ,..altnl(.0..t.k 01 color..\k,al Spoor. to:,I II.PIIhuN ` / 1• r'/� ` r' �* \\II . • I C • 4 M4• ♦ I • K!�. BA' . ,/ 17�)9 ADDITION •-Gs J ,., ... , 000 .. /L.uI 1014. EC R R'' 0) / O ti. 4� 1a` • \ ft•-' •• _ . . 2:77. 4- ..1.1. 44.." $ $ :Ra<,.. le At 41. .. ..1 • ef•:;,S1.<' y . 4 -"'", a 1 •'' 7 I,IR - .s° ,...l�M•k,r„ 10 •• • .6 ep• M.A•! 1 III 0 • i p73 'r u EI :2w" ✓ 1� ac !trails .1 i1lArE ^ rO Q� r. ,L.-"O>1K�1•l� \�h1 ,lci� ZO.tI1 1��ct' * r�",.o ,V 10 G`�k ac o•.• �y rai O,15�6•� t> o�c► 1..� Jo` y r�"�� .SZ`.:rcw r. v I z.1 OCr1CAYED FOR U�IP_ /G' kq• 1 `• r 1 STREET woo,. ay 'ICI IJI — I\°Ge'�,-A �Ri� !� V (9 Ab•4S.i0"W 36.1.42'1 6_Jr0. CONNF•R LAM 4A O Q` T 1 Y Y01 •,,Q R•••..0.'. %``,0 1 {.l'-1 A S 91.00 2b 1W , 364.O41'• CONNFN I RrO+ /4* Gi • 4.2h� ° ° - _vm r,l..� iS•1 �• ..�� CCU / 0 ,1Il, ; 006 45...0 . r c....la ( . O I+�(' C ti • `ik. �1(NEw) 1 a , 5\.1I. . KIMBALL ROAD In _ u l i t '�` ,�I a`,3Ar'O \ (RION1•-OF-stay] rn ;7 •1 \ �' v VOL 117P1, Fa lam • ti C, _ �• I C. a r 0 CO C M le SE1LE LIO.TE,y' ( At L 1 ` 1... - of r. +In O r y _ I. --._ 4'11 ••J.J W '^,rJ z r � z 6 _� n • 3r `..�o, ... Otr • 10B-12 • ; City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 28, 1997 • TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: - Ronald J. Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Approve the City's Participation in a Traffic Signal at E. Southlake Blvd. and Byron Nelson Parkway Bakground On September 17, 1996,City Council approved a Developer's Agreement for Timarron,Village I,to include the extension of Byron Nelson Parkway to F.M. 1709. As a part of that Developer's Agreement, the Developer agreed to bear the expense of the design of the traffic signal at Byron Nelson Parkway and F.M. 1709, and the decision as to sharing the cost of the traffic light would be deferred to a later date. The Developer has requested that the City share in the cost of this traffic signal to the level of 50%of installation cost,not to exceed$40,000. (If the cost of the signal is greater than$80,000, the Developer will bear any additional cost.) We have$40,000 in the current bond issue for this item. Ever since the City has considered placing a facility on the Timarron-Richards site, Council has discussed on placing a traffic signal at this location. The City has long realized that a signal at this location would be benefit for a myriad of groups, such as Diamond Circle Estates, City facility users, etc.,not just Timarron esidents. The installation of this signal, in conjunction with the construction Byron Nelson Parkway as a 4-lane divided roadway will alleviate many of the current and near term traffic demands on S.White Chapel Blvd. and S. Carroll Ave. The Developer has provided all necessary information and traffic data to TxDOT . to support this installation. Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a Developer's Agreement with Timarron to address the cost sharing of the traffic light at Byron Nelson and F.M. 1709. Please place this item on the Regular City Council Agenda for March 4, 1997, for City Council's review nsi ration. RH/1 Attachment: Agreement O:\W P-FILES.TREETSMO HTS,SIONABH RYON-N.MEM I 0 10C-1 f 0 TIMARRON VILLAGE"I",PHASE 1 03/04/97 AMENDED DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An Amended Agreement between the City of Southlake,Texas,hereinafter referred to as the"City," and the undersigned Developer,hereinafter referred to as the"Developer," of Timarron Village"I", Phase 1, to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas,hereinafter referred to as the "Addition," for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the proposed traffic signal at Byron Nelson Parkway and F.M. 1709. IV. OTHER ISSUES E. TRAFFIC SIGNAL The Developers agrees to bear the cost of the design of the proposed traffic signal at Byron Nelson Parkway and F.M. 1709. The City agrees to participate in 50%of the cost of construction of the traffic signal up to a limit of$40,000. If the total cost of construction exceeds $80,000 the Developer agrees to bear any additional cost over the City's share. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth.below. • DEVELOPER: By: Title: Address Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor S lOC-2 ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: DAW P•FILES\SU BOW\TIM A RRONWILL.1\PHASE I\MAW:1AM PO S • 10C-3 . I j'� TRQPH`' C�u8� I CV - r N .. \ LOYD LGERS L.L;l� . z) . VUL Mt G667. PAG 2300 ' _,im LT 1 YID A' I ! • J • = M Li - , • v � I Q0 Zr✓N! NG — Ai •` __ 29C' -G" ____ " 7 n I S1 SE. ; \ S. 890 30' 50, "� ?97. 8� , I I i I' I - ; I / I 01 I v1.n r � �_ _� tom= --'it_ - -f_kt r==�_i=-=�=-=- / 1 --�. I 1 _ 8' RR . CK dVA�' _ —� _ -' 1 f v , I ! YARD; IGNT #2W. ; ! I' ,_ ---f � _ -: � i • C 1 I [ rr71 , . r- 4 I I II 1 ; C. , 11 m - ` (r r,' � R• .tf. f. .:: ,h. .R. S>• .►. .f. .S'. t.. 4::.� %% .^....t % •. ...11:%. � i 1 • .-_-. •5 _: .. .4- 4y .;5, I is "' ( I { .. } 62G6'205C I 1 - �_ : u \ �� u m I f I I \` 7 N, I \i I �� \ \ � �m� \___. _1 N Q� j 0z z .. - . M T . `) 40 _> �; ,- L � T i� � V) C v Q') r (I 2v Gv oa . I � Q O t, L - � � 0 m - �� --!I I i �- �' LIJ ''" ., s� g SC_ 'L'_ - 2a' _`�J °C�� i0'�"Joj �+jt I C x , L.Lj O x : 1 v i-_ 1 a Z Q .5c C� r ' � m - i I `��'j(-� (--� H ,. 1 4 - , - •�. n s 1 y !: �: R'.'`alY! '111•� M .11•t yv'1- >, ! I I , t -.:_•t \ • yl j, 'IN ! - r 11 '( `� >t'- ''i'i + t t i Me �it r `'1'i '4 i• A` M di r- s. ' i I i - - I , , , 4 1 .\ , J ', `...-:,::.. ; ; j N T Y M A P >CD . _ i \ VICI I _ I 1� L 1 SCA_� �'i . _ 1` __ _ �' ~ �:r I� I I• 1 1 i t 1, �-"' , . . I �, 'TrI k : ' . / , - , .,;,. �f i 0 y _____ 8 -? . 25' -�I7 aF ''� -T \ i I I i InI / �. \ �� \\ l -- G - •H i r> V \\ Q� ---- 4' �E:RKD 1t� i I' \ C \ t , ' J j I \ I ~ ' �/ V J -�'� `! GRAVEL1. —� I �- �� - 4 Rv� SURF ACE ��?' I �� ' N ,\R' �x r-. �\ 11 \, T t i i I \ \\ \ I i I \ I I I : ; I I I \ 1, �- ---�..— -- _ . + a u J -.- --* __�) y `"` V 1; TIi I I / I ! // O • ___----- - •\ '1/1J I 3 �\ �\ \ �`J PGA �_ _ill� I ��\`(? / 1! ;; 11 iI I, 4 , I / I �� \ kTkiiEE3/ t__ t . T_ 5-„ T.R. -. --- 51 ' -0' ' --- _0 .--�2 -G 10' -0 q ' 6 T '— 1 • I i 1 �- j I ' 1 , 1 Ci - — 1 �_ - i 1 1 j i (_.)II -I1Ii;..It I �. I I i � I j I �" _ I I i i 1 I I I I I . I i I II I : _ .-" I ) I i - j — v _ , I 1 I I 1 ILL jI I N 11 ° I / i ,, i I_ \ 1 I \\ �" .: _ I it a I i .,' - \ � ' 1 c i j \ \ I Ili I 11 .1 {, h i r 11 ! i I ` VARIANCE REQUEST : ti ' P• t1 y I S µ �, j, I i - �' z j �� \ ; ' i - �. r "� \� it I ;1 aI I -s-- I 1 1 I , 1 \ 1 _. ., i 1 �, z i I - C10 --- r' h1 - YARuL GN' # :1 ! ' C�'3 GRAVEL W y_ -*E__ .F•. . I !I P 1 . GRAVEL SURFACE WITHIN SITE SURFACE ��,-` �. uJ - ,` v ij �- —_� I N LIEU OF ALL WEATHER SURFACE _- u - W v \ 4 \\ \\ � •, { o ` DUE TO SAFETY CONSIDERATIDNS. - f f s �\ 1. 1 �\ _ — - 11 ` �� Y D L `v+i A' 01� C s , 1 _.. \ v I , i.- M. r. J �1. 7 1^ n.,,'\ s- \ + I '1 ' I L.l ^ L. _r1 !'� - 1 _ c m _ 2. 8 MASONRY WALL IN LIEU OF I G \ _ " REQUI D BUFFER YARD _ __ \ \ z !; \, \ �_ \\ (_ _ s.a�e.rtaa•': .. .. .. +• - -_ _ ._ _.;" ' .-.-.._. /,I' t i • - n'V l ' I ^� 1 , RE - - __11 2 4 5 6 ACRES "I' w_, z -- _ _}-_\-\_ i r; \ , J i. I \ : -+ , - ` (106 , 9 7 8 s q . f t .) . ._..u,4—Aft A. i � > �. c; rJIm, L U D = MU i 1 j -- . L, y r�J.> - \ �`, ZONING = A G 'm - �C,, I a j r I ! • ' \ : ROP. L . J. Dr- - .:W . __ � _...:, . -. j.. 4.ft: ._.__....'i-•- _:::-: Y _ '�.. '` I I ! j . :w::::. -- ,. I + ova OP. ZONING' CS `� x l _ ---'_ ; 1. J ' i \ c' ' ' `•` \',I - \\\ '\ :.. -: , , , _ I - # - / j 1 I i I I - "� J `-i I i � i ` i I 1 i ' i ` �, - I- I \ I I a .. _ Q`�` I 1 Sl / I L \ \ , I SF- I c1 \ i I 1 I \ . ; I mm, __ ....... - I . . I /4 \ .. Lre , , t � I , i L S.- - 4 i m GRAVEL \ �a �'- I I - Q i !.,' \\ rr. . — SURFACE I I s.a�°3a a„�. 2215. �' I < I - I I I 1 \ � , \ j , I! i ; mm \ \ . ; ! - , . WARN I c V ! r �5'- N �J� \`\ \\ �. �. . : : : �\ I ' 1 . I LAN CAPE AREA MATER I AAA I /l� \\' 1 z I \ .� I •� :' 1 `'�-\ R _ „=YTE`� �/ \ I Il.. j . 1 I '�� / / i I �' !'rl ! I �% I I ?, BASED ON TYPE C BUFFER - - z \ , 1- � � �I A R � �', 1 Q. v I I ' 1 �� ! 1 \ . S ti ? �. `\ \\ t�.:.+..,; \\ ! j I Qi REOU I RELENTS • LENGTH OF EASEMENT •'� I �� 1 \ { � i j �__ 5 l 10 TYPE f 1 ,� I .'J I ! 7 ,��- b \ \ i• it F I !! 1 " ' ,-.s.._ \,� -------\7- __;� ► �: I ; i I S BASED\`�7F DRIVEWAY LENGTH ` i \ A f Q ,,� IT 1,6 `�`' - V ! L I I ``, BUFFER YARD ' � n \ii I ;; .. , -� N - a i. • : K \ - 1 - i - _. ~ f .-- `J � .^^•. I \ / -� /1 \ �\ �, - '1 �i ., !1 '1M .A '{.}C :A \T 711' K, '�1' RHi K 11, M -� K, .1' I - — ..- — — _ -- _ _. t—"� 1 4r \ \ `: iw4l v...,,. �.r a:?++.r•+ar�uwciaW�Mr<w�::• I _ r t _ _ x'-� - _ _ " 1� / �iJ Li `J \\ ; , I', . ` ti> • , • 4> ....... .: G� • ' •RA • i ..... i < •ti • . qy . .;> .. . �, . I t" I \-_'^.."---_-. -..• •� _ -- ' - - _ I / ! +_�' �/(� 1 rl '. \\ A. J''l,.f'_. '� <i .y ,�.. e1• y •w••d '�. •w.ey., ... .�� .y...;`11>_.4--4. .i>. .y_. . .t.• ( jl I rtt'�'*._" �`, - -�i___ / I t 1 - '' _ --- _ RETE _ -- - _ \ 13 — � — , Imo\ 1 I _ . _ - — V E _- _— -- �—LLJ ' 11 `t ; t,y �� ! r ti - \ \ \ j ~ Y T 'l A �i r - i 1 \ -I!- 1. 1. _ \, _ \ \ ' {S � ° !i \ " _ - G1. \ � `\ I � .A ! � S 1 4 _ � � i :6 RcE \� i t (1 = I I , 11 \ �\ \\ l_ r c - _ \ 8 ' '3R 1 C1� Wk I 1 ♦\ :9 'REE \ , t �1 !� . • R �---_ ___ =—�i=- -r— — f - :._ -=fir-- = = _ I ,2. _REE 8, E� 2'� -RE- �2 E i I / I �,., SG \\ 18' TR[.._ "0" .Ri T: �C' TREE 2; 'REE \ I 1 Z I t �T 4 / . . /.X /_. //', ii / i ! / < /// t<i +I — x ,_,__; �,"I ; I r _ I . - "_ - / i e -+ '/- fie- - cc \ \ .- `a - -- I Z 7,. __ __ 1 :> N 1 /1 I / - '); r , I : .------ --- n II ` , = fn" �T_' , — I / r \\ �'J ;_.._ Y _J Rc F i : T�'J't5 — �SC 1 Ou -ruS`?�C ROCK SCHAR T - 3 JFFFR !ARJS 24:, -RcF •24" TREE .4 TREE : 2 ` TR , ,, 14E,24•• 7R 2C„ rR_ / -- \ ' i I _� '—• �� (� TO& --- ' . 8 9 v L - .4 TREE ) •20" TRc_. I � 1 ! -. - 'i �� F ' � I �L_ \. \; ! GATE //is ( 1 , , j \ �' dR �v iv':R� 0" 'RtE II S$ I: , 1 i -I ; I �7 I �i ^L j 1 11 - - � j i .24' TREE // ; f 5� ��11 �. t \ 11 i e I —, (� i � 1 I \ j •24" TREE K TREE i 1 _ X _ �_ . r 1 V/ _ I I a • z "�'_-r �ti / _-- TRcC I I ._\,�-_ 1= '.R='�✓' I BUFFERYARD CANOPY I CANOPYI FENCE/ SCREENING I AS= . "1= R 1 : J=1 LNG1 H t W I D7H/ TYPt TREES TREES i SHRDBS +� HEIGHT & MA?ER I AL I r \'^'=i'- _ R`^ RF:� 298' S' -A ?' 3 1 �r 6 24 I NONE -- _ - ---_ I �R ::DED j- N/A N/A —, N/A N/A 1 8' MASONRY PENCE I � =AS- -- R"^ '3E0 220' 5'-A 2—t ?8 NONE DES N/A N/A N/A N/A 8' MASGNRY FENCc 1 \ ,R------- -+: a_ L26' 1 5' -A I 2 5 18 NNE i S E �VMe'\T Pq ✓. = 452' 0' -C 7 10 48 NONE to<---- _ .` RE 80' C' -E ? I 2 1 6 HI HEDGE — P ✓'Dr- 80' 1 10'-E 2 6 HI SEDGE F'-----_.____. Sc '- R=0 :RED 522' 1 NONE I 0 0 0 - I NONE i I aa, ✓ •,C- D I N/A N%A t�/A N/A 8' MASONRY FENCE j A� z - - �E C _j :'REC 70' I 5' -A I 1 1 6 1'1 8' SCREENING DEV IZE . , . I ? i PER ORD. 480, SEC. 39 j ~PRO'✓:DEC ! N/A I N/A I N/A I N/A 18' MASONRY FENCE W"5- REOu:REJ t 133'.II 10'-C 1 4 5 I 16 T 8' SCREENING DEVICE . 1 I 1 PER ORD.'480. SEC. 39 'PROVIDED N/A N/A N/A- N/A 8' MASONRY FENCE —I ' ,- ANY CRED 'S USED iN CALCULALIONS: C. EAST -80' -EXiSFING 2G" TREE c. 'YPE 'C S� TH SIDE OP vRiVE CREDIT 6 CANOPY IR $ ACCENT: TOTAL CREDIT AVAIL 47 CANOPY & 64 ACCENT 107N_R EOMMENTS: 11 t 1. PROVIDE 1O' TYPE 'C' BOTH SIDES OF ENTRY DRIVE. 'TOTAL ,LENGTH 45.2' , 3. . �� TREY i - 1 } . L-•-J / , 1 ( 1 24` TREE ,24,. TRE= —� -` ! i i \(\�-� _ — 1 y Y __ _._- \ i ., I 'i . �'-''} —.—. _ �, — . t �- _ . - L-J G /8 _ FCC c _ _ — — — — — — — ——.—.—.—•—•—•�--:..� ( � � 11 1 � j -- 2 /911 ! ' ; \ _- }:. 1; . V. Arti / i I J 1 1 C�.7 .. i \.� y 1 ^v„ R. C.,a . 1, i j pl A cVd - ► � Q ,may 1- : t 11 ') T\ i r/ . \ � j 1' = SCAB -0, I . 1 �' . 1 w ;. ' > I ' . . ' 1 REC'DFEB 241997 ;E 62962-005 _v -I I A �RA�ty! = ��' CASE NO. ZA95-16 (ShL NOR ooi _ 1 ' I >r• ,. - :. * . . .1 J1 I k s S S !t ' o I �P OnEED 6Y rS t��NAVE 1RfiSJ SS>< c. I - DATE PLOTTED : $**** ZDATE##"*" e f( aj{j