Loading...
1993-05-18 CC PACKET a City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 14 , 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting May 18, 1993 1. Agenda Item No. 4 . City Manager' s Report . • Chris Terry., Assistant to the City Manager, has accepted an employment offer with the Texas Municipal League in Austin. His resignation will be effective May 28, thus this Council meeting will be his last . Chris has been a valuable member of our staff and has done an excellent job for the City. He will be missed! A copy of Chris' letter is attached. We are in the process of recruiting for the position, and we hope to make an appointment by the end of the month. Realistically it may be the middle of June before a replacement can be named. • The departmental reports are in your packet . Please let me or the directors know if you have any questions . (FYI, not included in the report, as of today we have 28 SF permits. ) • Public Hearing on FM1709, from US 377 to FM1938, has been scheduled by TxDOT for Wednesday, June 9, . 1993 at 10 : 00 a.m. in the Keller Church of Christ, 205 Elm Street in Keller. 2 . Agenda Item No. 5A. Sanitary Sewer Easement Dedications for Lake Crest Addition off-site sewer. The developer of Lake Crest addition (Steve Gee) has negotiated the installation of the required off-site sanitary sewer through future Timberlake Phase 3 to the point of connection on S-4 . Timberlake agreed Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 14 , 1993 Page 2 to the granting of the easements and construction of the line because they will be able to use this line in the future . 3 . Agenda Item No. 7A. Ordinance No. 583 . 2nd Reading, Sammons Cable Company Franchise Agreement . Note that staff has requested this item be tabled until next meeting. We have most issues resolved, but the wording pertaining to indemnification still needs work. The Sammons attorney has been slow in responding. 4 . Agenda Item No. 7B. Ordinance No. 480-K. 2nd Reading. This ordinance concerns the issuance of building permits on platted lots which do not front on public or private streets . No changes have been made to the ordinance since first reading. 5 . Agenda Item No. 8A. Ordinance No. 585, 1st Reading, Tree Preservation Ordinance. This item comes from P&Z with a 6-0 recommendation for approval . Note from the May 13 , 1993 Greg Last memo in your packet that Ordinance No. 585 presented to you is draft number six. FYI, this ordinance began its journey to you on October 18, 1988, when following a presentation by Councilmember Sally Hall the City Council sent the item to P&Z . The Tree Preservation Ordinance was on P&Z agenda October 20, 1988 through February 2, 1989 . In between then and now were many other major ordinances, including the Zoning, Subdivision, Drainage, and Impact Fee Ordinances . The City Council in its June 16, 1992 meeting requested P&Z to again look at the ordinance. This history points out that the subject ordinance has had considerable study. When it began in October 1988 the only member of the current City Council who was on City Council then is Ralph Evans . Gary Fickes was Chairman of P&Z . Joe Wright is the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 14 , 1993 Page 3 Evans . Gary Fickes was Chairman of P&Z . Joe Wright is the only member of the current P&Z who was on P&Z at that time. 6 . Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution No. 93-42, Joint Utilization agreement between COS and CISD. The proposed agreement has been reviewed by CISD and COS staff and by the appointed members of the committee . Rick Wilhelm was the primary author of the agreement, with assistance from Buddy Luce. The proposed agreement will be on the next CISD Board meeting agenda scheduled for May 24 . 7 . Agenda Items 9B-9F are appointments to your advisory boards and committees . City Secretary Sandra LeGrand has information concerning applicants in your packet . I know I need not point out the importance of continuity on the SEDC. Staff works closely on community economic development issues (i .e. , commercial growth) with the SEDC. In reality, SEDC serves as an adjunct to our planning efforts . We have made considerable progress in the last two years . I have spoken with Rick Wilhelm, David Baltimore, and Bethann Scratchard (the CISD representative until the last election) , and all would like to continue to serve . This is a working committee [Council] , and of the 9-member SEDC these three (3) members have devoted considerable effort . Moreover, Rick has been the key member. With the vacancy that exists from Betty Springer' s resignation, Rick Wilhelm could continue on the SEDC as one of City Council' s citizen appointees . If Rick is not appointed, staff time requirements to continue our direction will increase considerably. Although Rick is also a member of the Joint Utilization Committee, he has told me he could continue to serve in both capacities . 8 . Agenda Item No. 10A, Developer' s Agreement for Myers Meadow Addition, Phase I . Note the comments from Bob Whitehead, Honorable Mayor and Members of .City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 14, 1993 Page 4 Director of Public Works, concerning the conditions that are somewhat unique to their development . Note also the memo attached from Janet Murphy, Chairperson, Parks and Recreation Board, pertaining to the Park Dedication Fees . Staff has some difficulty in understanding their rationale in applying the formula they devised. (You may want to talk to Greg Last and to Wayne Olson. ) City Council should set any formula to be used in order to comply with the intent of the ordinance provision. The key will be the "reasonableness" of the formula. 9 . Agenda Item No. 10B, request from Phil Jobe for a variance on placing a temporary turn-around, Stone Lakes, Phase II . The Uniform Fire Code contains the provision for turnarounds due to the inherent danger of backing large fire apparatus . When you consider the size of the aerial platform apparatus, you can see the danger. Mr. Jobe is bringing this item to you since there is not yet an appeals board for the various construction codes . 10 . Agenda Item No. 10C, Award of bid for Street/Drainage Improvements on N. Carroll Avenue, from Dove Road to Burney Lane. Bid awards are placed on consent agenda except when unusual circumstances require discussion. The drainage component of the bid is a major consideration in this project . It is safe to say that there will be similar situated circumstances in the future bond projects . 11 . Agenda Item No. 10D, Land Use Plan Map and Public Hearing. The Land Use Plan and report were adopted by Ordinance No. 447 in September of 1988 . On January 7, 1992 Ordinance No. 556 was passed which provided that all elements of a Comprehensive Master Plan may be approved by minute order. This would include the Park Master Plan (adopted 12/17/1991) and the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 14, 1993 Page 5 Thoroughfare Plan (adopted 12/17/1991) . Other elements include master plans for water and sanitary sewer systems, both of which are being updated as a part of the impact fee update. A final element is a Master Drainage Plan which will be a part of the discussion at the June Retreat . Note we have scheduled this as a Public Hearing to meet City Charter requirements . 12 . Agenda Item No. 11A. FM1709 Improvements Project west of Jellico Circle is being placed on the agenda as a discussion item should we need to discuss the issue. Other Items of Interest 13 . Note the attached letter from Landmark Corporation concerning problems with the design of our elevated water storage tanks. The upshot is that we will have a period of roughly six (6) weeks this summer when we will only have one tank in service. Note the memo from Bob Whitehead concerning the schedule. 14 . FYI, attached hereto is an article that you might be interested in concerning Arvida from the Monday, May 10, it Dallas Morning News Business Section. 15 . FYI, Leadership Southlake will have its graduation of the current class on Thursday, May 27, 1993 at 6 :30 p.m. You should have received an invitation from the Chamber of Commerce. If not, a copy of the invitation is attached. 16 . REMINDER, June Retreat is scheduled for June 17 & 18 . We are still developing the agenda, however, attached hereto is a working draft . Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 14, 1993 Page 6 17 . Preliminary Estimates of the 1993 Appraised Values of property . in Southlake were received this morning. The data is very good. Note the memo and comparison from Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance. Note also in her comparison that the net value (i .e. , net taxable value of $705, 114, 919 minus the new construction value of $67, 645, 069) is $638, 333 , 880 . The comparison of the $638 .3 over the $610 .4 is what will be the bigger part in setting the effective tax rate. Some of this increase is attributable to the conversion of a significant amount of property from open space/ag classification by the appraisal district (i .e. , the "Rollback" provision. ) Recall that we used a 5% estimated growth factor in our projections with the Community Road Task Force as we presented our bond package to the citizens. We also told them we could count on at least a 7% growth or better. All of our budget estimates concerning growth projections were in the 5-7% range. Recall also that we have known based on the building permit activity from last year that we would exceed our estimates once the appraisal values were ascertained. 18 . Marshall Creek Interlocal Agreement update. We received the proposed agreement last week following the Council meeting. Staff, our attorneys, and Councilmember Wambsganss have reviewed. We will forward a revised draft to the Marshall Creek attorneys next week. You may wonder why I felt the need to receive your authorization for the Mayor to execute the agreement last meeting, when we still do not have all the details worked out . We did this in order to show evidence to the TWC that the City of Southlake has not held up the project . The burden rests with the Town of Marshall Creek. As soon as the details are satisfactorily completed they can get underway with the project . Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 14, 1993 Page 7 19 . N. Kimball culvert . We will report to City Council concerning the automobile accidents at this culvert in executive session. Due to liability questions, this should not be discussed in public. Concerning the structural integrity of the culvert as a result of the accident, see attached memo from Bob Whitehead. 20 . The following is attached for your information: • History on the number of votes cast at City elections since 1978 prepared by City Secretary Sandra LeGrand. • 1993 Summer Youth Programs brochure prepared by Parks and Recreation Coordinator Tina Harvey. CEH 0 MAY 1 21993 oFF► ace MR May 11, 1993 Curtis Hawk, City Manager City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk: This letter serves as official notice of my intent to resign my _ present position of Asst . to the City Manager effective May 28, 1993 . I will be pursuing other career objectives that require me to leave the City of Southlake . I sincerely appreciate the support and encouragement that I received from you as my supervisor, fellow staff members, the City Council, and members of the Southlake community. Leaving employment with the City of Southlake was a difficult decision; however, I believe it is in my best interest to pursue the career opportunity that I have been offered. R spectful , Ch is Terry 11110FP- ;,-- Texas Department of Transportation P.O. BOX 6868•FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76115-0868•(: - E ;r i n M f� t1-1) May 6 , 1993 R tvg ._ 6 1993 CS] : 16 0 3-0 3-016 OFFICE OF CIT( FM 1709 MANAGER From US 377 To FM 1938 Tarrant County Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager, City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk: We have scheduled a public hearing to be held at 10 : 00 A.M. , Wednesday, June 9 , 1993 in the Keller Church of Christ , 205 Elm Street , in Keller, to discuss the above project . Classified advertisements will be published in the Fort Worth Star- Telegram and the Keller Citizen on May 4 , 1993 and May 25, 1993 . In addition, property owners that are involved are being sent individual notices . You and your staff are cordially invited to attend this public hearing. If you would like additional information about this project , we will give it our immediate attention. Sincerely, ` 7f - -ate /' Billy A. Hardie, P.E. -cpr Director of Transportation, Planning and Development CRB:dvr An Equal Opportunity Employer „___ LANDMARK April 29, 1993 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,TX 76092 Attn: Mr. Curtis Hawk, City Manager Re: 1.5 MG Elevated Tank(White Chapel and Dove) 1.5 MG Elevated Tank(White Chapel and 1709) Dear Sir. We have completed a review of our standard design,practice which has involved extensive research and analysis. A primary focus has been the design of the steel tank floor cone. Failure of the floor cone was the primary cause of the collapse that occurred during initial filling of a competitor's elevated tank in December, 1990. Please note the attached letter from our design firm,Cazaly Associates Ltd.. Given the exhaustive investigation undertaken by Cazaly Associates Ltd., we feel that the results reported are accurate and that the load factors reported for your elevated tank floor cones, while adequate,are less than what we recommend. We feel that reinforcement of the cone to improve the load factors is a prudent and conservative approach that we desire to proceed with. The reinforcement will involve steel flatbar welded to the lower portion of the interior tank floor cone. The procedure will require draining the tank,localized coatings removal, seal welding the reinforcing bars to the cone, localized coating repair on the tank cone interior and exterior, . chlorination and refilling. This process should take two to three weeks. Note that the reinforcement will not detract from the appearance and it will not be a maintenance problem. Please note that Landmark Structures Inc.has undertaken an extremely conservative and responsible approach in this matter. We request your cooperation with regard to our offer such that we may quickly and efficiently perform these improvements. We will be in contact with you soon with a request to set up a schedule. Note that this correspondence and its subject matter is not for the advice or distribution to any third parties who would attempt to discredit our reputation or generally use it in any manner to the detriment of Landmark Structures Inc. and Cazaly Associates.Ltd. We trust the above is to your satisfaction and look forward to working with you. Yours trul dimp • :- •v�l TRU v- • ,INC. dir • 's Lemon, P.E., Vice President CL:dg cc: Eddie Cheatham,Cheatham and Associates 1103 E.Price,Suite 102,Keller,Texas,USA 76248,Telephone:(817)379-6816,Fax:(817)431-3974 • • • Cazaty Associates Ltd. 71 Chatsworth Drive • Toronto Ont. M4R 1 R8 Phone : 416-481-0417 Fax 4 1 8-489-3898 Landmark Structures Inc. 1103 East Price#102 Keller 76248 Texas grid April 1993 Southiake Elevated Tanks near Sirs, We have completed an extensive research and design review program for our elevated tanks, which include.the above projects. A considerable amount of the investigation involved research into the strength of liquid loaded conical shells, as this ref tes to the conical floor of our elevated tank designs. The research combined analysis by the computer programs noted, belpw and geometric survey data from existing tanks . • Our assessment for this project is that the computed ioa4 factors for the floor cones are 1.44 for the first tank and 1.85 for the second. Yours truly, �,�� of......... �+ y )4 iiprioa D. f • I L. G C-s>,a_Y • Laurence Cazaty' , . Notes: • 1.The bad factor is derived from a formula developed from computer output using the :• •R 5(axl.symmetric) and ABAOUS and ANSYS (3 dimensional) progr•mines.Over 100 computer runs have been used in the analysis.They were ail i ed to the geometry and details used by Cazaty and by Landmark and no • attempt was made to extend them for general application to all liquid loaded cone . • • • • e�nn . -, IO1V1. T.T • r 2.The local Imperfection Coefficient is the maximum offset (from a straight line)of any meri¢fan near the springing of the cone, expressed as a proportion of tile critical wav length.The circumferential variations are assumed,as a worst case,to Vary with the same critical wavelength. The local Imperfection coefficient used was a maximum of 0.00-1,I and a miniriwm of 0.0021 .,with the circjmfrential variation fluctuating between those two limits.These values exceed the range measured in the field surveys. Although no as-built tank has such waves,the analysis atso assumes that. the rteridiona1 waves continue,sinusoidally,out to the edge of the tarn:This . ensures that the theory provides for the possblo amplification of the effect of one • impe tectbn by an adjacent one. • 3. 'Me tormula includes a coefficient which depends on the behavior of the :, . structural element supporting the tank cone;the geometry of the steel plates in . . the vicinity of the springing;and the degree of fixity provided. Our research has . lndlc4ted that these details can cause a significant difference in the load a given plate*will support. • • • • • • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 14, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City_Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E. , Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Landmark' s Reinforcement of Two (2) Elevated Water Tanks, White Chapel and Dove and one at Bicentennial Park On May 5, 1993 , Ernest Bramlett, Eddie Cheatham and I met with Landmark, Inc . regarding the letter of April 29, 1993 from Chris Lamon. Staff spoke with Mr. Lamon on May 12, 1993 regarding the schedule for the cone reinforcement of the City' s two (2) water towers . Landmark does not want to do the tanks back-to-back. Staff told him it would be the 17th or 18th before we could give• him a firm starting date. Tentatively, it will be May 28 before the 20" water line will be in service. Staff assured him we would push the in-service date for the 20" water line as early as possible. This is an approximate schedule of events to complete the tank modification at White Chapel and Dove Road. 1. 20" water main on FM 1709 @ Pearson Lane will be put back into service (out due to construction) - May 28 or sooner. Staff does not want to take the tank out of service before this is completed. The 12" line that now supplies the system makes any volume recovery time difficult. 2. After service is restored on 20" line, it will take 24 hours to draw down the elevated tank. 3 . Landmark will pay for more telemetry equipment from White Chapel/Dove to tank at Bicentennial Park. 3 . Landmark estimates - 3 weeks to make modifications and furnish a maintenance inspection of tank at White Chapel and Dove. 4. Landmark then proposes to schedule another tank in the metroplex before modifying our Bicentennial Park elevated tank. This three week period of down time for each tank will not affect our normal operation and fire fighting capability. The only negative with the situation is our supply cushion if any unforeseen interruption of supply should occur either from Fort Worth, electrical supply to the Alta Vista pump station, or the 30" supply main from Keller to Pearson Lane . Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Landmark' s Reinforcement of Two (2) Elevated Water Tanks May 14, 1993 Page 2 With the proposed schedule, the City will operate with only one tank for three (3) weeks in June and for a three (3) week period in July. The latter is the most critical as normally this is a heavy use period for water utilities in our area. FYI, all work except some painting will be done inside the tank. Staff is not pleased with the schedule, especially as it is in the summer, but feel that it can be handled. Our concern is, if we make Landmark wait on the reinforcement project, they may not do the repair and the City will have the liability. Staff will monitor and push Landmark to complete the project as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact me . BW/lc c:\wpfiles\memos\Landmark.wat LEADERSHIP SOUTHLAKE Southlake ...developing tomorrow's leaders today! ( THE SOUTHLAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE cordially invites you to attend the graduation of LEADERSHIP SOUTHLAKE Thursday, May 27, 1993 Marriott Solana 6:30 p.m. Dinner will be served Please RSVP to 481-8200 $20.00 per person June Retreat June 17 & 18, 1993 DRAFT Solana Education Center Thursday, June 17 : DINNER: served at Solana Education Center (5 :30 p.m. - 6 : 00 p.m. ) - Parks Board presentation (6 : 00 p.m. - 6 :45 p.m. ) • . 05 of 1. 0% sales tax • Bicentennial Park expansion • Parks Dedication Ordinance - C. I .S.D. Board of Trustees presentation on Joint-Use arrangements with the City of Southlake (6 :45 p.m. - 8 : 00 p.m. ) • recreation/athletic facilities • joint land purchases • library Friday, June 18 : BREAKFAST: served at Solana Education Center (8 : 00 a.m. - 8 :30 p.m. ) - Drainage issues (8 :30 p.m. - 10 :30 a.m. ) • erosion control • drainage utility district (DUD) BREAK: (10 :30 a.m. - 10 :45 a.m. ) • - Neighborhood street maintenance program (10 :45 a.m. - 11 :45 a.m. ) LUNCH: served at Solana Education Center (11 :45 a.m. - 12 :45 p.m. ) - Bond projects (1 : 00 p.m. - 2 : 00 p.m. ) Development user fees (2 : 00 p.m. - 2 :45 p.m. ) BREAK: (2 :45 p.m. - 3 : 00 p.m. ) - Other: • • Financial policy • Pay classification plan • Animal control • Denton Creek pressure system, long-range issues (3 : 00 p.m. - 4 :30 p.m. ) ADJOURN. • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 14 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Tarrant Appraisal District 1993 Preliminary Values for the City of Southlake Preliminary property values were received from the Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) today. These are property values within the City valued as of January 1, 1993 . These preliminary values are used in planning and preparation of the fiscal year 1993-94 budget that begins October 1. TAD will provide a certified Appraisal Roll Valuation Summary on July 25, and a Supplemental Certification on September 1 . Net taxable property values are $705, 978 , 949, an increase of $95, 517, 243 , or 15 . 6596 when compared with the prior year' s Supplemental Certified Appraisal Roll of $610, 461, 706 . New construction for the year is $67, 645, 069 . Historically, the City loses approximately 2% from the May preliminary valuations to the amount certified on July 25, therefore the actual percentage increase could be 13 .3396 or lower. TAD makes adjustments throughout the year. to the appraisal roll, primarily due to finalization of protested property values before the Appraisal Review Board. g'af/AU1 LAH _4 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE APPRAISED PROPERTY VALUE ANALYSIS May 14, 1993 Percentage Change from Preliminary Values to Final Values SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY CERTIFIED %CHANGE (FINAL) %CHANGE MAY 15 JULY 25 FROM PRELIM SEPT 1 FROM PRELIM 1993 $705,978,949 $691,859,370 —2.00% $0 • 1992 $621,449,533 $608,254,817 —2.12% $610,461,706 —1.77% 1991 $579,469,791 $569,475,542 —1.72% $570,763,061 —1.50% 1990 $537,311,716 $520,442,493 —3.14% $525,019,736 —2.29% *Estimate Comparison of Annual Value Changes %CHANGE %CHANGE SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY FROM PRIOR CERTIFIED FROM PRIOR (FINAL) ANNUAL MAY 15 YEAR FINAL JULY 25 YEAR FINAL SEPT 1 %CHANGE * 1993 $705,978,949 15.65% $691,859,370 13.33% $0 (new) $67,645,069 (net) $638,333,880 4.57% 1992 $621,449,533 8.88% $608,254,817 6.57% $610,461,706 6.96% 1991 $579,469,791 10.37% $569,475,542 8.47% $570,763,061 8.71% 1990 $537,311,716 1.15% $520,442,493 —2.02% $525,019,736 —1.16% 1989 — — — — $531,191,585 TAD2ND93 15 MAY 93 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE NAME OF TAXING UNIT LISTED BELOW ARE THE PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF THE 1993 APPRAISED VALUES OF THE PROPERTY IN YOUR DISTRICT. THESE ARE GROSS FIGURES AND ARE SUB- JECT TO REDUCTIONS FOR VARIOUS REASONS. THIS REPORT IS RUN PRIOR TO: COMPLETION OF STAFF DISCUSSIONS WITH TAXPAYERS APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD APPEALS RENDITION DEADLINES PARTIAL EXEMPTION PROCESSING & DEADLINES ABSOLUTE EXEMPTION PROCESSING SPECIAL EXEMPTION PROCESSING (FREEPORT, OPEN-SPACE, AG DEFERRAL, FOREIGN TRADE ZONE, ETC ) HISTORICALLY THE REDUCTIONS TO THE ESTIMATES HAVE AVERAGED AROUND 5Z ON A COUNTYWIDE BASIS PRIOR TO THE CERTIFIED VALUES IN JULY. 1993 APPRAISAL ROLL INFORMATION VALUATION SUMMARY TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE »»»»»»»»»»»»»» $789,659, 188 - DEFERRED SPECIAL USE VALUE LOSS: AGRICULTURAL $73, 860,656 SCENIC LAND $0 PUBLIC ACCESS $601,728 - PARTIAL EXEMPTION VALUE LOSS: DISABLED VETERAN $91,689 OVER-65 $9,221 ,935 HOMESTEAD SO DISABLED PERSON $768, 261 FREEPORT INVENTORY $0 NET TAXABLE VALUE >>>»»»»»»»»»»»»»> $705 ,114,919 (SCHOOL DISTRICT INFORMATION - . INCLUDES PROPERTY ON WHICH TAXES ARE "FROZEN". ) NEW CONSTRUCTION »»»»»»»»»»»»»»» $67,645,069 . (INCLUDED IN NET TAXABLE VALUE) 2315 Gravel Road • Fort Worth,Texas 76118 • 284-0024 r JOHN MARSHALL TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT CHIEF APPRAISER 15 MAY 93 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE A.R.B. PROTEST .INFORMATION THE PROTEST PERIOD HAS JUST BEGUN AND WILL ESSENTIALLY END ON MAY 31ST. THE A.R.B. WILL BEGIN HEARING APPEALS JUNE 1ST. LISTED BELOW IS THE VALUE TO DATE OF 'THE PROTESTED ACCOUNTS IN YOUR TAXING UNIT. THESE VALUES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR ESTIMATE. ADDITIONAL APPEALS WILL BE FILED. TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTIES UNDER PROTEST 2,247,941 NET TAXABLE VALUE OF PROPERTIES UNDER PROTEST 1,238,421 PROJECTED MINIMUM VALUE OF THE SAME PROPERTIES 864 ,030 • 2315 Gravel Road • Fort Worth,Texas 76118 • 284-0024 PGM: -APR222BP CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 022 RUNDATE: 11 MAY 93 *** REAL PROPERTY TOTALS *** ROLL : 15 MAY 93 1993 ' INE REPORT ITEM VALUE ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE I TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE: 741 ,897,003 5,813 741,897,003 2 ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS (-) 28,620,023 244 28,620,023 3 CASES BEFORE ARB (-1 2, 221,941 13 2,221 ,941 4 ADJUSTED VALUE TOTAL (=) 711 ,055,039 5,556 ' 711,055,039 5 AG DEFERRALS (- ) 73,860,656 305 74,723,167 6 SCENIC DEFERRALS (-) 0 . 0 7 AIRPORT DEFERRALS (-1 601 ,728 5 1,291,180 8 PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS (- ) 10,065,084 241 25,857,386 11 NET TAXABLE VALUE (=) 626,527,571 5,800 , 739,675,062 PARTIAL EXEMPTION DETAIL EXEMPT AMT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 12 DISABLED VETERANS 91 ,689 41 4,718,030 14 OVER-65 9,205, 134 201 20,897,579 16 DISABILITY 768,261 17 2,042,372 ' NEW FOR 1993 TAXABLE VALUE ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE r =`-.? NEW CONSTRUCTION VALUE 0 . 487 65,375,158 20 ANNEXATIONS 0 0 21 NEW EXEMPTIONS 2,171,041 21 3,041 ,526 22 NEW DEFERRALS (AG, SCENIC) 2 ,521 . 3 441,025 24 IMPROVEMENT VALUE LOSS 295,809 5 DETAIL ON NEW EXEMPTIONS EXEMPT AMT ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE 25 NEW ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS 60,000 . 1 60,000 26 NEW VETERANS EXEMPTIONS 6,000 . 3 650,915 28 NEW OVER-65 754,485 16 2,134,727 30 . NEW DISABILITY 50,000 . 1 195,884 33 NEW AG DEFERRALS 438,504 3 441 ,025 1 k*********************************************************************************: PvM: -APR222BP CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 022 RUNDATE: 11 MAY 93 *** PERSONAL PROPERTY TOTALS *** ROLL: 15 MAY 93 1993 LINE REPORT ITEM VALUE ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE 1 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE: 78,630, 149 390 78,630,149 2 ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS (-) 0 0 3 CASES BEFORE ARB (- ) 26,000 1 26,000 4 ADJUSTED VALUE TOTAL (=) 78,604,149 389 78,604,149 8 PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS (-) 16,801 2 16,801 11 NET TAXABLE VALUE (=) 78,587, 348 389 78,604,149 PARTIAL EXEMPTION DETAIL EXEMPT AMT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 12 DISABLED VETERANS 0 0 13 FREEPORT INVENTORY 0 0 14 OVER-65 16, 801 2 16,801 16 DISABILITY 0 0 NEW FOR 1993 TAXABLE VALUE ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE 19 NEW BUSINESS IN NEW IMP 0 6 2,269,911 1 NEW EXEMPTIONS 0 1 9,443 24 IMPROVEMENT VALUE LOSS 0 0 DETAIL ON NEW EXEMPTIONS EXEMPT AMT ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE 28 NEW OVER-65 9,443 1 9,443 3D . NEW DISABILITY 0 0 ********************************************************************************** et • City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM CST P ANAGER May 14 , 1993 G� TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E. , Director of Public Works SUBJECT: North Kimball Culvert - Action Report Staff' s investigation of the culvert on North Kimball within the City limits revealed that some action was necessary. Below is a list of the action Public Works Department' s Street Division performed. Also listed are alternatives to maintenance of that culvert . The following actions have been completed: • A series of delineators were placed along N. Kimball on the south approach to the culvert . • Eddie Cheatham and I have met with State Highway Department bridge engineers and a structural engineer to discuss alternatives . •. The trees and brush on the east side will be trimmed. • TML Safety Engineer will review. Alternatives under consideration: • Repair rail - install signs . • Repair rail - install flashing lights . • Remove rail - extend culvert - install new guard rail on culvert and approaches . • Remove old rail - install new guard rail on culvert and approaches . • Repair old rail - install new guard rail on culvert and approaches . As there are no state or federal funds for repair or replacement of a culvert, local funds will be required. Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager North Kimball Culvert - Action Report May 14 , 1993 Page 2 The preferred alternative to date is : Repair the old rail . Install new guard rail on the culvert and the approaches (the new rail will be attached to the old rail across the culvert) . A first estimate is around $5, 000 to $8 , 000 . Actions to be taken: 1 . Review alternatives with TML Safety Engineer. 2 . Prepare plans and specs . 3 . Receive proper authority for bids . 4 . Bid 5 . Construct These repairs may be funded from the Street Department budget, account 144/781 . Please contact me if you have any questions or would like to discuss further. �Vd/lc c:\wpfiles\memos\kimball.cul T CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ELECTIONS NUMBER OF VOTES FOR EACH ELECTION TYPE ELECTION YEAR NUMBER OF VOTES GENERAL 1978 401 GENERAL 1979 589 GENERAL • 1980 511 GENERAL 1981 657 GENERAL 1982 266 GENERAL 1983 379 GENERAL 1984 581 GENERAL 1985 315 GENERAL 1986 985 GENERAL 1987 967 CHARTER 1987 . 943 GENERAL 1988 771 GENERAL 1989 887 GENERAL 1990 740 BOND-CHARTER-COURT 1991 772 GENERAL 1991 713 RUNOFF 1991 344 GENERAL 1992 817 GENERAL 1993 1,707 1993 SUMMER. YOUTH PROGRAMS iir of 1-01 11111111111 . . . . , . . ...- .. .. ,.. . . . • . ,, ... . . . .. City of Southlake parks and Recreation Department th 1 :.y . ►, s ►derfun ttro. irk . . r rt.r 'I''‘,7.- eti, 1 Ir "S ( . Il•4 a , II :' , . ...r; ,r...,..z,.. •,. ,. /,jils... . :.. -41 . is,.-Tr::. .::-_--- lir . --. 2, tilt IVIN 1 ,r,i gttl • = kl. 3aseball camp, Fastpitch softball camp, Adventure camp, Tennis camp, Arts camp 1993 SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAMS SPONSORED BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT a e.: ARTS CAMP ,r, . "EARTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT" ` Ages: 7-12 years old I . . Dates: July 13-August 5 ,• ti Days: Tuesdays and Thursdays =? '' Time: 9:00am-12:00pm Itr-;'::11;, Fee: $61.00 (includes 15 supply fee) +5'rr"• • Registration deadline: June 25th `-1;? Course description: Create handicra fts� p using natural materials and nature themes. Discover the wonders of our environment through performing "hands-on"science projects. - -,-.1-11- Instructors: Northeast Tarrant Arts Council accredited teacher, Stacia Morgan, in her third year h"' with Summer Arts Camp, will organize and direct activities. BASEBALL CAMP Session I Ages: 7-10 years old (1 y Dates: June 14-18 \1 r Days: Monday-Friday iv, .\ 'i Time: 8:00am-11:00am Fee: $75 before May 15 and$100 after May 15 J ' ;i -_ Session II ' „ Ages: 11-14 years old R e Dates: June 21-25 }s� Days: Monday Friday a a " �•1l `lam Time: 8:00am-11:00am - Fee: $75 before May 15 and$100 after May 15 Registration deadline: Session I-June 11th and Session II-June 18th Camp description: Beginning to advanced skill level players will receive indvidualized instruction, drills, and practice in everything from fielding, hitting,pitching, catching, baserunning, run downs, and game strategies to dressing for the game. Camp instructors: Camp director, Sam Booker and his co-coach at R.L. Turner High School, Jim Mavroulis, will work with participants. Players from R.L. Turner and Carroll High Schools will assist. . 1 !` i JUNIOR TENNIS PROGRAM y, t INTRODUCTION TO TENNIS pp ,, ! r., '= Ages: 7-12 years old .<, i. Dates: Session I- June 30 and July 1 • - i=� : �--:; �;... • • ',•, . Session II-July 27 and July 28 /.' 7 1.,i; � Time: 9:00am-11:00am ,JI 1� ,I,I( t Fee: '$20.00 t_\ t!:JI1 �6r Registration deadline: Session I-June 25th (limited to 20) Session II-July 23rd (limited to 20) i`- Program description: Participants from beginning to intermediate levels receive developmentally • appropriate instruction,drill, and practice in the forehand, backhand, serve, ,, and volley strokes. All facets of the game including scoring, rules, and tennis I, etiquette are covered. Each participant will receive a T-shirt and personalized tennis story book.Individual improvement and enjoyment of the sport are stressed Program staff: United States Professional Tennis Association certified instructor and owner of "The Tennis Shop"in Grapevine, Dave Evans, will direct his experienced staff 44' '"'w J t'L) s'i . * lj VI • in.\-.14 .. ADVENTURE CAMP ]-1 .. { �; Ages: 6-12 years old 1( t9_-1Z\ Dates: Session I- June 7-June 11 _'- E. - ,: ��-�_ Session II- June 21-June 25 N 1,4-�. . $ g Days: Monday-Friday T . x ,-r Time: Regular camp hours:9:00am-4:O0pm -`-- -- „ 11 A Before camp hours: 7:30am-9:00am rk After camp hours: 4:OOpm-6:00pm •• �~` .,_`'` - Fees: $70.00 per week for regular camp hours $25.00 per week additional for before and after camp care or$2.00 per hour $5 DISCOUNT FOR REGISTRATION BEFORE MAY 15 Free Adventure Camp T-shirt to each camper Registration deadline: Session I-June 1 (limited to 36) Session 11-June 15 (limited to 36) Camp description: Provides youth with the opportunity to experience a variety of activities in a non-competitive atmosphere while emphasizing the development of physical skills, emotional growth, and self-confidence. Activities include: baseball, kickball, basketball, volleyball, hockey, archery, tennis,juggling,fitness tumbling, cooperative games, carnival, 'Beach Day", contests, cup stacking, playacting, dance, arts and crafts, carpentry, and bicycle repair. Snacks and drink are provided and awards given regularly. Camp staff- Lisa Haines,fourteen year elementary physical educator, "Teacher of the Year", Ross Perot educator award, master teacher certified, national presentor, and three time Adventure Camp counselor,will direct a certified and experienced staff 1 • • ftj. GIRL'S FASTPITCH SOFTBALL CAMP ,•. _r Session I „�-L_t__ _ .10;Ages: 7-12 years old Dates: July7" 5-8 (i' mow,:7, Days: Monday-Thursday Time: 9:00am - 12:OOpm . Fee: $50.00 Session II 'r'�` ��' Ages: 13-17 years old ' -!- Dates: July 5-8 Days: Monday-Thursday Time: 1:00-4:00pm '''� Fee: $50.00 Registration deadline: July 1st Camp description: Players will follow steps of progression from beginning to advanced level in each skill. Participants will receive specialized instruction in pitching, catching, outfield, infield, hitting, baserunning and playing strategy. Camp staff:j. As a collegiate player at Sam Houston State University, Julie Thomas was a four year letter winner, chosen 2nd team All American, 'Hitter of the Year', 1st team All-Conference, 1st team All-Regional, and set a national record in stolen bases. Julie is currently coaching and teaching at Marcus High School in Lewisville where she was recently named 'Coach of the Year'. Assiting Julie is another scholarship athlete from Sam Houston who, as a pitcher, led her team to a conference championship and was chosen 1st team All-Conference. Christie Pumilty will instruct participants on how to accomplish a wide variety of pitches, the drop, rise, curve, change-up, and basic pitching form. FREE T-SHIRTS FOR ALL PARTICIPANTS REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Registration for all summer youth programs will be held at the Community Building in Bicentennial Park at 300 North White Chapel Road. Registration hours are from 8:00am-12:00pm and 1:00-5:00pm, on Monday through.Friday. On Saturday, May 8th and Saturday, May 15th instructors for each activity will be at Bicentennial Park. Participants may also register at this time. Registration fees must be 'paid in full and are non-refundable. ;FOR MORE INFORMATION: Contact Tina Harvey, Parks and Recreation Coordinator, at 481-5581 ext.756. ALL ACTIVITIES WILL BE HELD AT BICENTENNIAL PARK FACILITIES. —,:City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 18, 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Items of Interest The following is being provided for your review and information: • Draft of the Marshall Creek Agreement with comments from Analeslie Muncy • 6-year sales tax revenue comparison • Star-Telegram article regarding - Northeast' s (Cities) overall Tax Values increase • Letter from TxDOT regarding meeting with Texas Highway Commission concerning SH114 • Letter from Philip Bressinck regarding possible park land sites • TU Electric letter regarding rate increase proposal of 4% • Ralph Evans condemnation document If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. CEH ., CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SALES TAX REVENUES six year comparison 1992-93 collected budget balance budget to date balance percent $579,000 $346,836 $232,164 40.10% FISCAL.:;;F.ISCAI_ :.FISCAL :-..FISCAt ...FISCAL FISCAL YEAR YEAR %Inc ' YEAR,:i %Inc RYEAR %Inc YEAR.- %Inc YEAR %Inc ..........,„ ...,. ,....i-...,...........,..,....:::........... MONTH ;:;:ii;.*:;;87.18,8:;.;i'i;;;;•.;1;.;;;;;;;.;;.88/89.: (Dec) .;:;;';;;89/90.:;i; (Dec) '.;.•:;;:;:;;;'..90/9.1';'...;1;;.;;.. (Dec) ;;;:::':;;'"91192;:..;::.; (Dec) .i.;....;.::::::92/93 ., (Dec) - ----- .. . .....„.„...........,... .' ...:ii;:::::-.:...-.,...-:... ......:.:-....;•::.: .....,...,...;,...-::-.;.... .- -.::::.; ..:-. ..,........:::: October ....;;;$35i7:15;.:;';:-.S27i97,0.;; -21.7% ...-......$37;777..6 35.1% .;;;;'$??.14;081i; 16.7% 1;;. 46.,73,-.1.. 6.0% •:;',.i.$.50..i96::.i.; 90% .-...:•,.....;:;.;.,........,;;...,;;;;.:;:::::;;;;.. ......,...„..:.:....-..-;,......i...i...;:;.,::. ''-';-"•• ''..-.,,,...,... ..:::::-.;••••,.....-,:::::::,...; November :::.4,22;047:.k...,.::...1:5-,420:: -31.9% .;;'..;,;245..73-:'. 59.3%... ...;:•;',;',i;...37,14147:..' 51.0% .....,,..27.:029.• -24.8% :;,::::::-.;::-..42420::: 50.8%.,-;,...;...::::....:::::::;.--..-;;•;•....,...;:...--:•:...::: .:.,..-:.-..,...;:......' ...„,.... ..,...,.......,........ '::::::'";:.;•;-.•:;"'''....?:;,;;I', .....,, .. ...........,.. ..;.....;....;.......;;;•;;;;:-:-..:;-;..;;.....;,, .:;....:-:::::::.;•,-;.. --:.....,... ...;:;:,:-....--.;:;......;•;..:::::.;:: ...... ..; . ..,,,,...... December .';.....:::::.:1.0.023......;:;:..;::::::47.;.•;830. 9.29 '''...;-1;21.1.....;13.....$.2;;; 18.1% 28;464:::;. 35.2% -:-...::::.......... 3a.13: 16.9% ::::::..i.::..-f..33;85(I.:.:-. 1.7% ....... 4............ • •••••••-•.;.; .--.: •',....,-; .;•;-;;.;;;.;••••--;:- ....,,i;:,;;,.........:;,. -. ....-- ;.• ..;:.:•....;.;;; ; January ;;-...;:.;;;...:.32-:;703';;;;.::: 61756:. -18.2% .--;,.....;;-:34463',- 28.8% ;;;;;;.;;;;;:.;41740.6:;: 36.7% -;,.....:40.•DI2. -15.1% .:...i....s....2:07;71::3::.-: 69.2% :„......„.............,.............., ........„...... . ....,. ,......... ......... ..„: ::.;;;;;;;;;•::;;;;;.;;.-.-•;....; :;;. .-..y..,..,-..:...,..........::::::,......- . ....; ....-....-;...., '-•;-•.;..-...;•:.;-;:',.-..:....;:'i;:..;....;•:.;.:.;:.;:::;; ,.,......;..,....:•:..,.....,:::: :;;;;:i;.;-.;.if.;':::-..;.-:•••.....;,.;..;:,.-. ....:.......:.......i.-;,.... February 1,3;1,63........1;i;:::18.94-... 20.7% ...-..!•-2,.5..;;; 94:::; 61.0% ;i;;;;•:;;:.;:;..2Z;;.487.:::.; -12.1% ..-..;....,.;,;..:40;1.96'.. 78.4% ;':;'.....;.:::39.053..,!! -1.9% ...... ........,...................„... ... „,...........,..... , ..;.......:...., ; ' ...."-.•;•:::1-i'',. '.....i...;;:ai.,.......;:.;;:;::::....:•:.;:i.....;;.n; -;:;,.......;,.......-.........?;.•;:;,;: . ,....._...,.....,, .. March 9325; ;;....;--14,778;; 58.5% :-. 30,0.7... 107.5% :...<:-..g.32;95:::... 7.5% ...--'3,71.488'• 13.8% :::::::•:;. ;44,0...7.6.. 17.8% ::: . .......,... ..............,...„.....,...... .„............ ..... ,.. .....,. ....... ................,...... April ;;;;;;;;.;'37845-:;,;;;-;;;.48'635.;: 28.5% . ;;;37a01;;: -23.5% ;;;'.;',;:;i:41,•:;;445-: 11.4% ii.........,57.:;.543: 38.8% 1:::::'....68'664:::; 19.3% -...... ..:...,....... ....:,......4......., 4.............. if....*:;..-....-;. . -..,;,...:;......,.;.;;-:.-.. .........::.... -............:...- -.--.- .:-: .• •••••••-•---;.;;;- :..-. ,-,.;:;,..,...f....May 1 .-.5..451........0...-.............2•. 7.....:.,824,....:.. , 79 4 ....3..-1....)5,.....0..,,1,...•• 13.2% ......,3....6...)627 16.3% . 41;020 12.0% :•;••••••;;-.. :-;;•;•;;;:?..;:i;•••;•••;:. ,. .,.;:::: :.. )„...... ..-.•.. •• .•••-•.•:::.............., - :•••-••••-••.'•.:'''''•••: 7•••••$•••:.•:*' .....:....:„..:...„,......., .-:.,-.....,:' . ,,, :.:••••i.,,..,..,-..,••••...„:::: ;.„........',:.,...;:f.:--••••,:::•,...•••. rune ';'.;'.;:.;*•;•:22.J95.-;;;....;'::;';24;;05:1;i; 8.4% ;.;;.....;.:;:::3....:7....$4,..........7. 55.7% .:;.-;.;:;';51:i.8.9.4:::.; 1.2% .:1;:•;;';'41;105;:; 13.8% --;:;%-;:;......;•-•-• - .. ';;;-•-•••••••-: .........,........„................... ........, . ............,. ................:.,....„..,.......... ...,......„:„.....................:.. ....,...,.......... -;';;;-:::::;-:'••..,:•;:::::;';;;-.;';';;'";•;-.;* ........,....:•:::::::::::;::;::::::::::..: -'''...---•-: July i;:4;32159::;:;:..;:;';;;.;;$8•;630.;:: 20.1% '.....,....:;:n.;374::... 33.0% :.;-:.;-•-;;::;•:';417"017. -8.5% :;;.;;.;-;•51:457 9 2% -..... .,. „..........i..........„,,:::,....,.... -........; :::-::•,.. .- ......;..,...:...........-•;:::::-:::::::;:p ,. . . August 24;1:75- -:;:',4499i: -6.1% ;.;:::::-.-..;3.1,96. ;; 40.8% l'..;:li;:•;::15.0..51;;;; 12.5% ::::;;;;;...;;;.:48.;.731;;- 35.5% ....;•::.-'i ' .-.#;:::.:.;:•-•;-. .,............... .. ...... ....... ..... ..... ... ., ....,....-....-:::,......,;::::,.;....:,.....-....:::,..• .... ......,.., .,. ::;:;:•;.... - ........::::::. ;;....;;;;;;;;;;;;";;;;;;•;;;::;''';;....-1;;; ......... ...................„ September ..;:::::;-..;;;-:.19;141:::i;:::::;.......31204;:. 63.0% :;".';::;:i....52.;;499:;.:. 4.2% 317.....;004-.; 13.9% ::::.--,:;•::.;42741„ 15.5% .;:;'...;•:::::;.-;;;;;;:::;:;:;:::;•.............:... _.. , -;:•;.:-.;:::-.;i:::::::...:i.....il.::::..............-;-:.......;- ..:::,....,:.-,,..........:.....::i;:...... ........;::::::::.::.:.::;::.:...::::;•:::: ..,...,$289 ,.......................... ..,.........................:::: .,... .;. .......: :-.... :.: TOTAL ; ;901:;;;S311;;699-; 11.0% $396;106.;i.; 27.1% ;S:448;148:::.; 13.1% i S510;.:036;;; 13.8% .$346;836:' 22.5% .4......- -.. ..,..;-,.......-.;;;....,......;,..... .--- --.......,.......- .-,..-..........,...• ;:.:-.... ....;.;:;.--....-.,......•i;.:....• ....;:::::::.:.........,;;;,:... ...: ;:-.i..::::............................................ „,:.;;;;......- -.-...:-...:-..-..- REPORT DATE 05/17/93 . . • cc: Mr. David Bernsen Mr. Henry R. Munoz III Ms. Anne S. Wynne Mr. Byron C. Blaschke Mr. Frank D. Holzmann Mr. M. L. Yancey Mr. J. R. Stone Division of Highway Design Division of Transportation Planning Division of Maintenance & Operations ro) E /1&- 1111 till) y,;:ice +e r=s<;+ a�.,.>CJ,z.+; •'vi»,�:nMi ♦ ,h)'` `:;N:.4- -t.,. ' eY I ► 1993 Y t yam(n ' �y �;.11 ._... ' w + E - i �r 3 1 tea, - M 'OF CITY May 10, 1993 Ms. Tina Harvey Parks and Recreation Department City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Shlake, TX 76092 Re: Park Land Dear Tina: Congratulations on your new position with the city of Southlake. I read with interest the recent newspaper article about your duties and desire for additional park land. As a current resident of Southlake and a former member of the Parks Board, I agree with your assessment of a lack of future park land. Being in the commercial real estate business, I am aware of several parcels of land that may be of interest to the city as possibilities for future park sites. (1) 43 acres on Continental Blvd.,just west of Peytonville Rd. Asking$25,000 per acre. (2) 38 acres on Continental Blvd.,just east of White Chapel Blvd.,Asking$28,000 per acre. (3) 60 acres on Burney Lane, just east of Carroll Ave. Asking $20,000 per acre. an affiliate of The RE. Group Advisors, Inc. 2400 Ellis• Fort Worth,Texas 76106• (817) 625-9974 • Fax(817)625-9978 I would be happy to provide you with additional information on any of these sites or others that you may identify as potential sites. Please give me a call if you or the Park Board would like to look further. Thank you. Sincerely, ?).44.1.3/\52 ./A., Phillip Bressinck PB/sdp Enclosures cc: Gary Fickes, Mayor iirtis Hawk, City Manager - I MAP SHOWING �,�I �y� I f NI VV ID VELOPNiafeTS l 1 . BURNEY LANE IM THE 1�T'Tt1 ME4t+DO{4 1 ON .QME ,i ii c . 3(44S,I '1 11 - GRAPffiC SCALE r CITY OF SOiDTHLAKE cARRou JI,II i�ld( > - r _— SI .t11i TA Ft Ft ANT COUNTY, TEXAS HIGH „ram, in SCHJCLI.+ ` ,Ian-uw;L AUGUST, :997 VE -�.--- DC/_ 5,.,�_I DOVE S-REET 1 iz i iQ • 1 \ J al I� J a rtLWOCD ESTATES ''' i5 SAN HOPE -a3YresDN- OMES Z _ ;<LOTS --�.DEa-- O Q -- _Q SF-1 S.A. -c.'NSauC'noN- j/ • r y 5 V ,i.D:J04N5^.N yy�i�/t,. -f1` •ALSCHOOL III1111 r RAve+m%PLACE19 LOTS ` SU-cDIVIp1ON �� \ �T-- HIGHLAND STREET •ZONED 1 • �; < IIIIIII ; I (� I I I CARROT \ MIDDLE 1 I n Q SCHOOL 71 . / -DWN"SY Inv) ms t0 4'/, F1' $ • Al0 i: , '� :- ,•f $ 1/# DCTRA // i . ,sPy�- , /i cODniRIDG I.c < I i•285 LOi1N ø!::i;;_7L OHNSCN ROD yEA OW F!A i;09 . II.tr' ... LI � � . 'DRuENT(TPA AL.!:T'D T LOTS 3u.Oui I — >- TONE K.D it6. Midge Lams(69) 172 391 Q- =�69 L° �,_ I . CARROLL LM°°— J_._ ONINC ' .D of iy / me).Nm(e9) 73 73 HIGH SCHOOL (UNDER CONST., re.Downs(e9) 106 :06 I 1 S_'I. J992 N ..me Dove OW. :C9 I -`vl 709 ZI /f o,a Esteem(e9) :] 16 uA ' %��i✓���- LJl — 7.1 .r Lase(90) :fi] :]S I+-( ' I J/i,/11 3�� --�' G Q EC CC I/ at..mai.(go).- 62 On I CARROLL ' St lS�/.-# �•I dP11N i �y -' U __M NTARY �S to % - SITE,r ,2 o+m Estates(90) s 75 of SCHCOL� �. I * —_ IMMMIIIIIININ rc.�i9(90) :26 :xa / . ,y.Country(90) sl I - '/''/ / �I �0 CONTINENTAL BLVD. Nooe Aaeitl,r,(91) a 1A I ONOLEL)- rroo .Lo.;9(91) lv :66 III 1 .. t_ ot,iii . SF_20.0__ .w.(681 ,9 •9 COUNTRY WA<LK� \'c7// Ic zDocaori[acccc eas orwa TOTAL _ SO LOTS 1. �nielm'.1,. -76 ZONING SF 0 (i c�cwLw?a--.1+-+++nc a ...As Nat.-62 1, D LotsI....+-•.., _. • C AA/\ c TUELECTRIC / F-p„i 1,000 30 May14, Louie P.Rhodes,Jr. L'eQ Manager Mr. Curtis Hawk Southlake City Manager 667 N. Carroll Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk: As part of TU Electric's commitment to fairness to the cities it serves, the company plans to offer an additional 1% of its gross revenue from retail electricity sales for franchise payment to those cities that it currently pays 3%, to bring them to the level it compensates the City of Dallas. Prior to the merging of Texas Power & Light, Texas Electric Service, and Dallas Power & Light to form TU Electric, the City of Dallas was paid a 4% franchise fee, while the cities served by the other companies were paid 3%. The commitment was made at that time, that when the Dallas franchise was renegotiated, all of the TU Electric cities would be treated consistently. TU Electric has paid the City of Dallas 4% of its gross revenues from retail sales of electricity since the first franchise was granted in 1917 to form Dallas Power & Light, and that level not only represented payment for the use of the city streets and alleys for its facilities, but also served as payment for other permits and fees within the city with the exception of sales and ad valorem taxes. It also covered the expenses of the , city's regulatory staff which took a very active role in the regulation of electric rates and services. The city's current regulatory responsibility is changed somewhat by the Public Utility Regulatory Act but is still reflected in the current franchise. The Public Utility Regulatory Act, which is the law governing both cities and the Public Utility Commission in Austin, provides for utilities to reimburse certain expenses to cities for the regulation of rates. In the future, reimbursement for these expenses will be covered by, the additional 1%, as it is in Dallas. Yours truly, /Ciceg„ Sonny Rhodes P.O.Box 1329 Grapevine,Texas 76051 1 IS- ype�s ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EXISTING FRANCHISE BETWEEN THE CITY AND TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY TO PROVIDE FOR A DIFFERENT CONSIDERATION; EXTENDING THE TERM OF SAID EXISTING FRANCHISE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ACCEPTANCE BY TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, Texas Utilities Electric Company (hereinafter called "TU Electric" ) is engaged in the business of providing electric utility service within the City and is using the public streets, alleys, grounds and rights-of-ways within the City for that purpose under the terms of a franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of the City and duly accepted by TU Electric; and WHEREAS, TU Electric has, pursuant to said franchise ordinance, been paying to the City a sum equal to three percent (3%) of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the City for the rights and privileges set forth in said franchise ordinance and, in addition thereto, has reimbursed the City for its ratemaking expenses pursuant to Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act; and WHEREAS, the City and TU Electric desire to amend said franchise ordinance to provide for a different consideration to consist of a sum equal to four percent (4%) of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the City, which different consideration includes, among other things, TU Electric' s obligation to reimburse the City for its ratemaking and other regulatory expenses to be incurred by the City involving the regulation of TU Electric; Now, Therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF THE CITY OF , TEXAS : SECTION 1 . The consideration payable by TU Electric for the rights and privileges granted to TU Electric by the franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric is hereby changed to be four percent (4%) of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the corporate limits of the City, said changed percentage to be applied to said gross receipts beginning on June 1, 1993 , and being payable as specified in said franchise ordinance and based upon the same time periods as specified in said franchise ordinance and being payment for the said rights and privileges during the period specified in said franchise ordinance, said payment being in lieu of and shall be accepted as payment for all of TU Electric' s obligations to pay municipal charges, fees, rentals, pole rentals, wire taxes, inspection fees, easement taxes, franchise taxes, certain regulatory expenses under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act or any similar or successor law, or other charges and taxes of every kind, except ad valorem taxes, sales and use taxes, and special taxes and assessments for public improvements . SECTION 2 . TU Electric shall make a one-time payment hereunder -2- for the purpose of making the changed consideration as specified in Section 1 hereof effective on June 1, 1993 , without altering the payment dates specified in said franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric, said one-time payment being due and payable thirty (30) days after TU Electric' s acceptance of this ordinance as provided in Section 7 hereof, and being a sum calculated as follows : (a) TU Electric shall determine the monthly average of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the City • during the period upon which the most recent franchise payment made to the City prior to June 1, 1993 , was based; (b) the said monthly average of its said gross receipts shall be multiplied by 1% (0 . 01) ; and (c) the product so calculated shall be multiplied by _ the number of whole months from June 1, 1993 , through the last day of the last month of the period for which the most recent franchise payment made to the City prior to June 1, 1993 , was made. SECTION 3 . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 1 hereof, if TU Electric files general rate cases and the City incurs cumulative expenses, otherwise reimbursable by TU Electric under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act or similar or. successor law, in excess of $4 million, then in such event, TU Electric shall reimburse all of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with all general rate cases filed during the period ended fifteen (15) years from the effective date hereof in excess of said $4 million. The term "general rate case" as used in this Section means a rate case initiated by TU Electric in which it -3- , seeks to increase its rates charged to a substantial number of its customer classes in the City and elsewhere in its system and in which TU Electric' s overall revenues are determined in setting such rates . City agrees to exercise reasonable best efforts, considering the facts and circumstances, to keep its expenses on average to under $1, 000, 000 per general rate case . SECTION 4 . Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1 hereof, TU Electric will continue to reimburse the City' s ratemaking expenses, if any, in connection with the appeal and any remand. of Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 9300 that are otherwise reimbursable under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act, and will continue to reimburse the City' s ratemaking expenses, if any, in connection with Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 11735 that are otherwise reimbursable under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act to the extent that said ratemaking expenses are incurred through the entry of the last action by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (i .e . , the said Commission' s order overruling the last motion for rehearing) in said Docket No. 11735 ; the City hereby agrees that any ratemaking expenses incurred in connection with said Docket No. 11735 that the City incurs on appeal of said order will be the City' s sole responsibility and further agrees -- in the events that the City is a participant in the joint intervention of cities managed by the Steering Committee of TU Electric Service Area Cities intervening in Docket No. 11735, that the City decides to continue to participate with the Steering Committee in such -4- appeal of said order, and TU Electric is required to reimburse said Steering Committee for ratemaking expenses under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act that are incurred on appeal of said order in Docket No. 11735 -- to reimburse TU Electric the City' s share of reimbursable expenses related to said appeal and owed by TU Electric to said Steering Committee determined by the methodology chosen by the said Steering Committee (the City to notify TU Electric of the method so chosen by the Steering Committee prior to the submission of an invoice by the Steering Committee for the payment by TU Electric of said reimbursable expenses related to said appeal) . SECTION 5 . The said franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric shall not terminate as provided therein, but the initial term of said franchise ordinance is hereby extended for a period of fifteen (15) years from and after the date on which said franchise ordinance would have otherwise terminated but for this extension. SECTION 6 . In all respects, except as specifically and expressly amended by this ordinance, the said franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms . SECTION 7 . This ordinance shall take effect from and after its final passage and TU Electric' s acceptance . TU Electric shall, within fifteen (15) days from the passage of this ordinance, file its written acceptance of this ordinance with the Office of the -5- • City Secretary in substantially the following form: To the Honorable Mayor and City Council : Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU Electric) , acting by and through the undersigned authorized officer, hereby accepts, on this the day of , 1993 , Ordinance No. amending the current franchise between the City and TU Electric . TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY By: President SECTION 8 . It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 9 . An emergency exists necessitating the suspension of any rule requiring multiple readings of this ordinance and all ti multiple readings of this ordinance are hereby waived. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF THE CITY OF , TEXAS, this the day of , 1993 . Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney -6- ORDINANCE NO. exi 3 rti y Pn—c.L,rs.C. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EXISTING FRANCHISE BETWEEN THE CITY AND TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY TO PROVIDE FOR A DIFFERENT CONSIDERATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ACCEPTANCE BY TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, Texas Utilities Electric Company (hereinafter called "TU Electric" ) is engaged in the business of providing electric utility service within the City and is using the public streets, alleys, grounds and rights-of-ways within the City for that purpose under the terms of a franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of the City and duly accepted by TU Electric; and WHEREAS, TU Electric has, pursuant to said franchise ordinance, been paying to the City a sum equal to three percent I (3%) of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the City for the rights and privileges set forth in said franchise ordinance and, in addition thereto, has reimbursed the City for its ratemaking expenses pursuant to Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act; and WHEREAS, the City and TU Electric desire to amend, said franchise ordinance to provide for a different consideration to consist of a sum equal to four percent (4%) of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the City, which different consideration includes, among other things, TU Electric' s obligation to reimburse the City for its ratemaking and otherregulatory expenses to be incurred by the City involving the ,' regulation of TU Electric; Now, Therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF THE CITY OF , TEXAS : SECTION 1 . The consideration payable by TU Electric for the rights and privileges granted to TU Electric by the franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric is hereby changed to be four percent (4%) of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the corporate limits of the City, said changed percentage to be applied to said gross receipts beginning on June 1, 1993 , and being payable as specified in said franchise ordinance and based upon the same time periods as specified in said franchise ordinance and being payment for the said rights and privileges during the period specified in said franchise ordinance, said payment being in lieu of and shall be accepted as payment for all of TU Electric' s obligations to pay municipal charges, fees,,. rentals, pole rentals, wire taxes, inspection fees, easement taxes, franchise taxes, certain regulatory expenses under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act or any similar or successor law, or other charges and taxes of every kind,, except ad valorem taxes, sales and use taxes, and special taxes and assessments for public improvements . SECTION 2 . TU Electric shall make a one-time payment hereunder for the purpose of making the changed consideration as specified in Section 1 hereof effective on June 1, 1993 , without altering the payment dates specified in said franchise ordinance heretofore duly -2- passed by the governing body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric, said one-time payment being due and payable thirty (30) days after TU Electric' s acceptance of this ordinance as provided in Section 6 hereof, and being a sum calculated as follows : (a) TU Electric shall determine the monthly average of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the City during the period upon which the most recent franchise payment made to the City prior to June 1, 1993 , was based; (b) the said monthly average of its said gross receipts shall be multiplied by 1's (0 . 01) ; and (c) the product so calculated shall be multiplied by the number of whole months from June 1, 1993 , through the last day of the last month of the period for which the most recent franchise payment made to the City prior to June 1, 1993 , was made. SECTION 3 . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 1 hereof, if TU Electric files general rate cases and the City incurs cumulative expenses, otherwise reimbursable by TU Electric under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act or similar or successor law, in excess of $4 million, then in such' event, TU Electric shall reimburse all of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with all general rate cases filed during the period ended fifteen (15) years from the effective date hereof in excess of said $4 million. The term "general rate case" as used in this Section means a rate case initiated by TU Electric in which it seeks to increase its rates charged to a substantial number of its customer classes in the City and elsewhere in its system and in which TU Electric' s overall revenues are determined in setting such -3- rates . City agrees to exercise reasonable best efforts, considering the facts and circumstances, to keep its expenses on average to under $1, 000, 000 per general rate case . SECTION 4 . Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1 hereof, TU Electric will continue to reimburse the City' s ratemaking expenses, if any, in connection with the appeal and any remand of Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 9300 that are otherwise reimbursable under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act, and will continue to reimburse the City' s ratemaking expenses, if any, in connection with Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 11735 that are otherwise reimbursable under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act to the extent that said ratemaking expenses are incurred through the entry of the last action by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (i .e. , the said Commission' s order overruling the last motion for rehearing) in said Docket No. 11735 ; the City hereby agrees that any ratemaking expenses incurred in connection with said Docket No. 11735 that the City incurs on appeal of said order will be the City' s sole responsibility and further agrees -- in the events that the City is a participant in the joint intervention of cities managed by the Steering Committee of TU Electric Service Area Cities intervening in Docket No. 11735, that the City decides to continue to participate with the Steering Committee in such appeal of said order, and TU Electric is required to reimburse said Steering Committee for ratemaking expenses under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act that are incurred on appeal of said -4- order in Docket No. 11735 to reimburse TU Electric the City' s share of reimbursable expenses related to said appeal and owed by TU Electric to said Steering Committee determined by the methodology chosen by the said Steering Committee (the City to notify TU Electric of the method so chosen by the Steering Committee prior to the submission of an invoice by the Steering Committee for the payment by TU Electric of said reimbursable expenses related to said appeal) . SECTION 5 . In all respects, except as specifically and expressly amended by this ordinance, the said franchise ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City and duly accepted by TU Electric shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms until said franchise ordinance terminates as provided therein. i SECTION 6 . This ordinance shall take effect from and after its final passage and TU Electric' s acceptance . TU Electric shall, within fifteen (15) days from the passage of this ordinance, file its written acceptance of this ordinance with the Office of the City Secretary in substantially the following form: To the Honorable Mayor and City Council : Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU Electric) , acting by and through the undersigned authorized officer, hereby accepts, on this the day of , 1993 , Ordinance No. amending the current franchise between the City and TU Electric. Further, in recognition of the fact that the current franchise between the. City and TU Electric terminates prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) years from the effective date of said amendment, TU Electric hereby agrees to negotiate in good faith with the City for a new franchise to be effective on or before the termination of the current franchise and to include in said new franchise a -5- provision that will give the City the full benefit of the fifteen (15) year period provided for in Section 3 of said amendment . TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY By: • President SECTION 7 . It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 8 . An emergency exists necessitating the suspension of any rule requiring multiple readings of this ordinance and all multiple readings of this ordinance are hereby waived. • PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF THE CITY OF , TEXAS, this the day of , 1993 . Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney -6- NO. CIO) — ;4?- i 1 - CITY OF SOUTHLAKE § CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS VS. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF § TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS W. RALPH EVANS § JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PITITION NOW COMES the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff,and files its original petition for condemnation, and would respectfully show the Court the following: I. Plaintiff is a. municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas duly incorporated, organized, and existing under and by virtue of a special Charter adopted by the qualified voters of Plaintiff, pursuant to the power vested in those voters by the laws and Constitution of the State of Texas. As a municipal corporation, Plaintiff is vested with the power and authority to appropriate_private property for public purposes by condemnation proceedings, and to exercise all of the powers of eminent domain, particularly in connection with the development, construction, improvement, maintenance, and all other uses generally associated with a park, library or any other public purpose permitted by law. W. Ralph Evans, Defendant, is the owner of a tract or parcel of land located in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas which is more specifically described by metes and bounds. in Exhibit "A" and shown on the survey in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION Page 1 c\egg\southlake.pet J r . incorporated herein for all purposes. Defendant may be served with process at 315 North Shady Oaks Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092. II. Venue lies in Tarrant County, the county where defendant resides, and the location of the land sought to be condemned in this proceeding. III. The City Council of the City of Southlake, in the exercise of its sound discretion, has determined that it is necessary to provide for the future expansion of an existing public park known as Bicentennial Park, and in connection with such expansion, the City Council has authorized the acquisition of an additional tract of land adjacent to Bicentennial Park. The land sought to be acquired could also be used for a library or for any other public purpose. The tract of land sought to be acquired contains approximately 9.97 acres of land. In compliance with public necessity, the City Council of the City of Southlake has duly authorized its attorneys to institute condemnation proceedings as are necessary to acquire the tract of land. I.V. Prior to the filing of this Petition, Plaintiff has, in good faith, engaged in negotiations and made every effort to reach an agreement with the Defendant to acquire the additional tract of land Plaintiff seeks to condemn in this proceeding. However, Plaintiff and Defendant have been unable to agree on the value of the tract of land. V. All acts, conditions and things required by the laws of the state of Texas and the Charter and ordinances of the City of Southlake precedent to the institution of these PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION Pagc 2 c\cgg\southlakc.pct • , proceedings have been done. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff respectfully requests that three disinterested freeholders of Tarrant County, Texas be appointed special commissioners as required by law, who shall determine the value of the tract of land described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, that a decree of condemnation be entered as requested in this Petition, and that Plaintiff have any other and further relief to which it may be justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, LLP. 8851 Highway 80 West Suite 300 Fort Worth, Texas 76116 (817) 560-0303 Fax: (817) 560-3953 By: , d/( Wayne K. Olson State Bar No. 15276900 E. Glenn Gidel State Bar No. 07885500 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION Page 3 c\egg\southlake.pet EXHIBIT 'A' Being 9.97 acres of land out of the Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract 686 in Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly de'cribed by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a fence corner, being the northeast corner of a tract of land deeded to W. Ralph Evans as recorded in Volume 4543, Page 782 of deed records of Tarrant County, Texas. THENCE South 1 degree 7 minutes 0 seconds East, a distance of 165.14 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds East, a distance of 161.19 feet to an iron pin for a corner; THENCE South 2 degrees 4 minutes 37 seconds East, a distance of 227.34 feet to an iron pin for a corner; THENCE South 1 degree 42 minutes 24 seconds East, a distance of 196.35 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 26 minutes 0 seconds West, a distance of 580.17 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 1 degree 43 minutes 47 seconds West, a distance of 750.00 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 26 minutes 0 seconds East, a distance of 580.00 feet to a fence corner, being the point of beginning and containing 9.97 act. of land nure or less. I EXHIBIT 'B' SOUTNUKE ESTATES I OAK HILL. ESTATES TRACT 20 I/P.D.B. HPPTLIVOT 580.00• TRACT?B .412 ni yy TRACT 1 4,,u TRACT 2A ti $1* LITTLZIZRRY Q. HALL 8 SURVEY MST.NO. 666 H .1 4 TRACT 1E 4 TRACT 3C1 TRACT 301 .--- TRACT 1B ni S2922.00'W 3E0.1T • N W it E S 1"=200' 001924LB.DWG I certify that this is a ; F• T true and accurate •• CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES representationat thin '/r�_•a 1170 CORPORATE DRIVE NEST SUITE 207 survey as made an the EDDIE L. CHEATHAM ARLINGTON. TEXAS 78008 ground. METRO (817) 640-4329 ••Y � • � (817) 633-1023 2346 o. o � qN O 0 SURNC"DATE : -ZCI—`13 • City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 18, 19 9.3 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICKES AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: 28th Annual Institute: Association of Mayors, Councilmembers, and Commissioners. I have attached information in regard to the 28th Annual Institute, Association of Mayors, Councilmembers and Commissioners, to be held this year in Plano, on July 22-25, 1993 . Each year the institute is held in different parts of the State, this year in our back yard. Mayor Fickes encourages members of Council to attend, as the seminars offer excellent information that is helpful in serving as an elected official. If you would like to attend the seminar, or just parts of it, please let me know and I will make arrangements for you. To take advantage of the early discount price, the attached form (last page) must be completed, 'and postmarked by June 30, 1993 . If I can help, please let me know. sl I MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORTS APRIL 1993 Building 4-1 Complaints 4-2 Finance 4-3 Municipal Court 4-4 Public Safety 4-5 Street 4-6 Utility 4-7 Zoning 4-8 APRIL 30, 1993 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE _ PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR APRIL 1993 NUMBER OF THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR PERMITS ISSUED MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE FISCAL FISCAL APR93 MAR93 APRIL 1992 1-4 1993 1-4 1992 10/92-04/93 10/91-04/92 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 39 34 15 134 95 237 147 Alteration/Addn. 5 5 1 14 3 25 6 Accessory Bldg 4 3 0 10 10 13 19 Commercial-New 2 2 1 9 5 17 5 Commercial-Alt/Addn. 1 1 2 2 6 4 16 Foundation Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Swimming Pool 16 23 10 62 29 85 43 SUB-CONTRACTORS: Electrical 80 85 39 309 188 556 292 Plumbing 63 64 37 222 155 384 262 Heat/Air 45 37 19 148 114 267 184 Culvert 1 2 3 4 4 7 • 6 Demolition 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 CERT. OF OCCUPANCY: Residential 80 48 33 198 120 352 211 COMMERCIAL 6 22 6 44 29 59 39 OTHER: Misc.Building 27 39 18 127 63 194 97 SIGNS. 3 4 7 22 39 , 35 57 SCHOOLS 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 TENNIS COURTS 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 FENCE 0 1 0 3 3 3 8 CHURCH 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 TOTALS 372 372 191 1311 864 2242 1393 4/-I CITY 01 UTHLAKE PERMIT MC,L.�..LY REPORT REPORT FOR APRIL 1993 APRIL 30, 1993 FEES COLLECTED FOR THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR PERMITS ISSUED MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE FISCAL FISCAL APR93 MAR93 APRIL 1992 1-4 1993 1-4 1992 10/92-04/93 10/91/04/92 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 48,579.00 42,359.00 25,273.00 166,560.00 119,535.00 290,100.00 181,110.00 Alteration/Addn. 1,074.00 1,460.00 249.00 3,341.00 377.00 6,303.00 1,205.00 Accessory Bldg. 328.00 593.00 .00 1,509.00 1,934.00 3,453.00 2,825.00 Commercial-New 2,446.00 238.00 2,788.00 5,370.00 9,503.00 8,811.00 9,503.00 Commercial-A1t/Addn. 163.00 252.00 177.00 415.00 2, 101.00 1,812.00 5,397.00 Foundation Only .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Swimming Pool 3,675.00 5,309.00 2,744.00 14,319.00 7,428.00 20,470.00 10,379.00 SUB-CONTRACTORS: Electrical 8,616.78 7,669.90 3,651.90 29,667.92 19,560.33 52,095.72 29,932.68 Plumbing 7,125.75 6,417.00 3,410.25 23,982.00 17,079.75 42,498.25 26,413.50 Heat/Air 4,137.50 3,248.00 1,506.00 13,298.50 9,038.00 23, 116.50 14,553.25 Culvert 65.00 130.00 195.00 260.00 260.00 455.00 390.00 Demolition .00 .00 .00 .00 15.00 15.00 15.00 CERT. OF OCCUPANCY: Residential .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Commercial 120.00 180.00 150.00 690.00 690.00 1,110.00 990.00 OTHER: Misc.Building 654.00 993.00 486.00 3,111.00 1,578.00 4,743.00 2,478.00 SIGNS 175.00 125.00 375.00 1,327.00 2,331.00 2,083.00 3,270.00 SCHOOLS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TENNIS COURT .00 .00 .00 151.00 .00 151.00 .00 FENCE .00 20.00 .00 164.00 987.00 164.00 2,350.20 CHURCH .00 15.00 .00 15.00 .00 15.00 .00 TOTALS 77,159.03 69,009.90 41,005.15 264,180.42 192,417.08 457,395.47 290,811.63 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE APRIL 30, 1993 PERMIT MONTHLY REPORT REPORT FOR APRIL 1993 THIS LAST SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR BUILDING VALUATION MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE TO DATE TOTAL FISCAL TOTAL FISCAL FOR PERMITS ISSUED APR93 MAR93 APRIL 92 1-4 1993 01-04 1992 10/92-04/93 10/91-04/92 BUILDING: Res-Single Family 8,335,400.00 7,257,041.00 3,273,000.00 28,524,741.00 19,185,000.00 49,379,832.00 29,677,302.00 Alteration/Addn. 102,500.00 299,900.00 20,000.00 460,200.00 25,800.00 722,700.00 . 101,800.00 Accessory Bldg. 19,900.00 45,000.00 .00 110,900.00 160,300.00 448,300.00 223,700.00 Commercial-New 258,000.00 42,500.00 400,000.00 601,400.00 1,275,200.00 881,500.00 1,275,200.00 Commercial-Alt/Addn. 8,000.00 25,000.00 6,500.00 33,000.00 284,500.00 48,000.00 549,300.00 Foundation Only .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Swimming Pool 293,000.00 423,500.00 174,500.00 1,143,600.00 548,300.00 1,642,900.00 777,800.00 SCHOOLS .00 31,000.00 .00 31,000.00 .00 31,000.00 .00 TENNIS COURTS .00 .00 .00 11,000.00 .00 11,000.00 .00 FENCE .00 500.00 .00 8,400.00 81,600.00 8,400.00 223,500.00 CHURCH .00 500.00 .00 500.00 .00 500.00 .00 TOTALS 9,016,800.00 8,124,941.00 3,874,000.00 30,924,741.00 21,560,700.00 53,174,132.00 32,828,602.00 TOTAL INSPECTIONS: 1605 1535 931 5827 1810 10,168 3776 BUILDING INSPECTIONS: CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION Building 450 416 385 OCTOBER 156 $11,700.00 NOVEMBER 59 4,425.00 Electrical 417 384 181 DECEMBER 60 4,500.00 Plumbing 450 481 218 JANUARY 39 2,925.00 Mechanical 264 214 125 FEBRUARY 20 1,500.00 MARCH 32 2,400.00 TOTAL BLDG. INSP. 1581 1495 909 APRIL 32 2,400.00 CODE ENFORCEMENT: TOTAL Investigations 24 40 22 TO DATE 398 $29,850.00 COMPLAINTS REPORT DEPARTMENT THIS LAST # CLOSED # CLOSED YTD* YTD** MONTH MONTH THIS MO. LAST MO. RCVD. CLOSED APR93 MAR93 APR93 MAR93 1993 1993 Streets & 32 22 27 41 82 90 Drainage Code 24 40 20 33 111 84 Enforcement Water & 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wastewater * YTD totals for 1993 Calendar Year ** Includes complaints carried over from last year. MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT APRIL 1993 TRAFFIC I NON TRAFFIC Non State City Parking Parking Law Ordinance Total 1. NUMBER OF CASES FILED: 363 1 48 10 422 ' 2. DISPOSITIONS PRIOR TO TRIAL: A. Deposit Forfeitures 0 0 0 . 0 0 B. Payments of Fine 141 1 17 1 160 C. eases Dismissed 65 0 3 3 71 3. DISPOSITIONS AT TRIAL: A. Trial by Judge (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 B. Trial by Jury (1) Finding of Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 (2) Finding of Not Guilty 0 0 0 0 0 C. Dismissed at Trial 0 0 0 0 0 4. CASES DISMISSED: A. After'Defensive Driving 21 0 0 0 21 B. After Deferred Adjudication 10 0 1 0 11 C. After Proof of Insurance 51 0 0 0 51 5. CASES APPEALED 0 0 0 0 0 6. WARRANTS ISSUED 0 0 0 0 0 if TOTAL REVENUE COLLECTED: CITY $12,672.50 STATE 4925.00 TOTAL 17,597.50 SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MONTHLY REPORT April, 1993 POLICE SERVICES Citations Issued _422_ Residential Burglaries _14_ Arrests 35 Business Burglaries _3_ Traffic Accidents _17_ Vehicle Burglaries _2_ Alarm Calls 103 Assaults 1 Animal Calls _48_ New CID cases assigned _46_ Thefts Under $750 _21_ CID Investigations Cleared _41_ Thefts $750 and up 7_ Active CID Investigations _139_ FIRE SERVICES Residential Fires 1 Ambulance Calls: Commercial Fires 1 Vehicle Accidents 11 Other Building Fires _0_ Non-accident EMS _23_ Vehicle Fires _1_ Total Patients Transported _13_ Grass Fires _8 Grass/Weed Complaints _10_ Fire Alarms - False 15 Burn Permits Issued 66 Fuel Spills/Leak _3_ Pre-fire Inspections 5 Other Haz-Mat Calls _5_ Building Plans Reviewed 4 Bomb Threats 1 SUPPORT SERVICES Total Police Service Calls _562 Total Training Hours: Total Fire Service Calls 64 Police 0 Crime Prevention Surveys 6 Fire 18 Total DARE Classes Taught _2_ Communications 0 Warrants Received _0 Volunteers 18 Warrants Cleared 13 Total Personnel Trained 15 Total Warrant Collections $1,762 .50 9-1-1 Hang-up Investigations 1 y5 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 10, 1993 TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Street Department Monthly Report - April, 1993 . The enclosed report details the Street Department activities for the month of April, 1993 . This report is to be included in the City Council packets for their May 18, 1993 meeting. RW/ck City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 07 , 1993 TO: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works FROM: Brad Payton, Street Superintendent SUBJECT: Monthly Report for Street Department April, 1993. Description Mar. Apr. 1 . Tons of asphalt used a. Ultimate Petroleum Mix 0 0 b. Hot Mix Asphalt 7 0 c. Cold Mix Asphalt 500 300 d. Base Material 0 500 2 . Lane Miles of Road Repaired 105 125 3 . Number of Street Signs Repaired or Replaced (all types) 24 31 4 . Feet of Ditch Line Cleaned and shaped 500 450 5 . Number of Vehicles Repaired 1 3 a. Replaced muffler on Gradall's superstructure b. Replaced radiator and water pump on grader c. Replaced master cylinder on 1 ton flat bed truck 6 . Row mowed in miles of streets 5 75 BP/cbk City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 10 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Water Department Monthly Report - April, 1993. The enclosed report details the Water Department activities for the month of April, 1993 . This report is to be included in the City Council packets for their May 18, 1993 meeting. -/-/ - RW/ck '-/-7 UTILITY DEPARTMENT REPORT MONTH April, 1993 MAR. APR. GALLONS PUMPED FROM WELLS 0 0 PURCHASED FROM FORT WORTH 28,294 , 000 38, 105, 000 TOTAL PUMPED AND PURCHASED 28,294, 000 38, 105, 000 WATER METERS SET 36 34 NEW WATER TAPS MADE 1 7 VALVES REPAIRED 0 11 VALVES TESTED 12 3 FIRE HYDRANTS INSTALLED 0 0 FIRE HYDRANTS REPAIRED 0 0 FIRE HYDRANTS FLUSHED 8 1 DEAD END WATER MAINS FLUSHED 26 0 WATER MAINS REPAIRED 0 2 WATER METERS AND SERVICE LINE REPAIRED 5 7 NEW ACCOUNTS 56 52 FINAL ACCOUNTS 52 52 LOCKED METER FOR DELINQUENT PAYMENT 7 6 PULLED METERS 1 0 METERS REPLACED 7 4 MISCELANEOUS WORK ORDERS 107 94 SEWER LIFT STATIONS CHECKED (4 L. S . ) 86 88 REQUIRED MONTHLY SEWAGE TESTS 8 10 SEWER PLANT MAINTENANCE (BANK & DOVE) 46 44 SEWER MANHOLES INSPECTED 0 5 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS 0 1 82 Man Hours working on fence project at City Hall WATER SUPERINTENDENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS City of South lake,Texas COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEE REVENUE REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING 30 April 1993 ZONING $ 100 . 00 NO. OF CASES (1) PLATTING 4, 970 . 00 NO. OF CASES (4) SITE PLAN/CONCEPT PLANS . 00 NO. OF CASES (0) SPECIFIC USE PERMITS . 00 NO. OF CASES (0) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 150 . 00 NO. OF CASES (3) MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 345 . 15 NO. OF RECEIPTS (24) TOTAL REVENUE $ 5, 565 . 15 TOTAL NO. OF RECEIPTS (32) C:\WPFILES\GLORIA\REVENUE.RPT • y-g City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 13 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT DEDICATIONS - Off-site Sanitary Sewer Service for the Lake Crest Addition The purpose of these two off-site easements are to provide sanitary sewer service for the Lake Crest subdivision. One of the sanitary sewer easements traverses a portion of the existing Section II, Phase I, Timber Lake; the second is an extension of the first and crosses a future phase of Timber Lake. Attached are copies of the proposed easement dedications with appropriate descriptions and exhibits . City staff has also reviewed the request and has no problem with the dedication of the easements . Please place this item on the council' s agenda for approval of the sanitary sewer easement dedications and authorization for staff to take relevant action to facilitate the filing of record of the dedications . Staff will obtain signatures upon approval . GL/te Attachment : Sanitary Easement Dedications File: C:I wpfileslmemosllk crest.esm 5 _/ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT That we, SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten($10) Dollars and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by Grantee herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, have granted, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, sell and convey to the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, Grantee herein, of Tarrant County, Texas, a perpetual easement for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, altering,replacing, relocating and operating utilities in,into,upon,over, across and under that land in Tarrant County, Texas, described as follows, to wit: Permanent 15' Sanitary Sewer Easement: See attached Exhibit 'A' for metes and bounds description. See attached Exhibit 'B' for graphic depiction. together with the right of ingress and egress as necessary for such purposes, and an additional contiguous temporary construction easement for a period of one (1) year for the purpose of installing utilities on the property known and described as follows, to wit: Temporary Construction Easement: Immediately adjacent to the above described easement in a configuration as shown on Exhibit 'B.' Such temporary and permanent easements shall include the right to excavate upon such property, but Grantee shall replace any fence, improvements, or other fixtures upon said property without cost of Grantor, or current owner thereof, and shall restore the property as nearly as possible to its condition prior to entry thereon. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described easement, together with all and singular, the rights and appurtenances thereto, anywise belonging unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and We do hereby certify that We are the owners of the property described herein and bind ourselves, our heirs and assigns, to warrant and to forever defend all and singular the premises unto the said Grantee, is successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim same or any thereof. Executed this the day of , 1 993. SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE By: NICHOLAS R.DiGIUSEPPE,Authorized Representative S0a STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared NICHOLAS R. DiGIUSEPPE, Authorized Representative SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of , 1993. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission expires: Approved by City of Southlake, day of , 1993. By: Mayor,City of Southlake Return to: City Secretary City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Grantor: Southlake Joint Venture 14680 Montfort, Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75240 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING a tract of land out of the JOHN BAILEY SURVEY,Abstract No. 97 and the P.J. HYDE SURVEY, Abstract No. 667, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being part of Lot 45R, Block 1 of Lots 34R through 45R, Block 1. TIMBER LAKE, SECTION 1, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the replat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1215, Map Records of Tarrant County, Texas; BEGINNING at a point in a south line of the beforementioned addition from which a 1!2" iron rod with a cap stamped 'Nelson Corp.'found for the southeast corner of said addition bears east, 50.00 feet; THENCE with the south line of the beforementioned Lot 45R, Block 1,West, a distance of 16.65 feet to a point for corner; THENCE leaving said south line, North 25043'43" East, a distance of 120.83 feet to a point in the west line of a fifteen foot (1 El utility easement dedicated to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 484, Map Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE with said west line, South 00°25'22" West, a distance of 35.09 feet to a point for corner; THENCE leaving the west line of the fifteen foot (15'I utility easement, South 25043'43" West, a distance of 81.88 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.0349 acres of land. PPR 01 '93 11:45RM NELSON CORP (214) 380 2609 P.5/9 eea immAEsaz - • F.M. HIGHWAY NO. 1709 5/B" I.F.f. 15' UTILITY EASEMENT CAB. A SLICE 4134 M.R.T.C.T. b n. y LOT 45R A BLOCK I bC LOTS 34R THROUGH 4SR, BLOCK f TIMBER LAKE. SECTION 1, REPLAT / CAB. A SLIDE 1215 / M.R.T.C.T. / / 1/2' I.R.F. JOM BARLEY MAW MST.Ae.fT _ / P.J. WOE SURVEYABMT.W.667 `u 35 025'22'W /�� j 50' TEMP. ha- //W CONSTRUCTION COMMON AREA /ti+,/ Ia.1/ ��g,?y EASEMENT �/ orEsr 50.00.•�1/2' Las. M/CAP HEST - 16.65' • POINT OF 4 BECINNINC g a co 3i* APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT SCALE: 1' = 60' TIMBER LAKE SECTION 2 2 f 0.99 ACRES SOUTIILAKE JOINT VENTURE YOE. 9719 PC. 599 EXHIBIT B SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TIMBER LAKE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS THE NELSON CORPORATION Ww PLANNING- ENGINEER NG•5'0EVDTING • 6999 SUIDIERStDt DR.. SV)tE 202 DAUAB.127.AS (214) 200 rAx(214)290-2B09 CON212UCTIOX 11AHAGIMENT 5.t1 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT That we, SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten($10) Dollars and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by Grantee herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, have granted, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, sell and convey to the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, Grantee herein, of Tarrant County, Texas, a perpetual easement for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, altering,replacing, relocating and operating utilities in,into,upon,over, across and under that land in Tarrant County, Texas, described as follows, to wit: Permanent 15' Sanitary Sewer Easement: See attached Exhibit 'A' for metes and bounds description. See attached Exhibit 'B' for graphic depiction. together with the right of ingress and egress as necessary for such purposes, and an additional contiguous temporary construction easement for a period of one (1) year for the purpose of installing utilities on the property known and described as follows, to wit: Temporary Construction Easement: Immediately adjacent to the above described easement in a configuration as shown on Exhibit 'B.' Such temporary and permanent easements shall include the right to excavate upon such property, but Grantee shall replace any fence, improvements, or other fixtures upon said property without cost of Grantor, or current owner thereof, and shall restore the property as nearly as possible to its condition prior to entry thereon. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described easement, together with all and singular, the rights and appurtenances thereto, anywise belonging unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and We do hereby certify that We are the owners of the property described herein and bind ourselves, our heirs and assigns, to warrant and to forever defend all and singular the premises unto the said Grantee, is successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim same or any thereof. Executed this the day of , 1993. SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE By: NICHOLAS R.DiGIUSEPPE,Authorized Representative Th—/ STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared NICHOLAS R. DiGIUSEPPE, Authorized Representative SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of , 1993. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission expires: Approved by City of Southlake, day of , 1993. By: Mayor,City of Southlake Return to: City Secretary City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Grantor: Southlake Joint Venture 14680 Montfort, Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75240 sA-`7 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING a strip of land out of the P.J.HYDE SURVEY, Abstract No. 667 in the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas and being a part of the 210,99 acre tract conveyed to Southlake Joint Venture by deed recorded in Volume 9719, Page 599, Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas and the centerline of the fifteen (15) foot easement, 7.50 feet on each side, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in a south line of Timber Lake Section One,an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 484, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas from which a 1/2" ken rod found with a yellow plastic cap stamped `Nelson Corp.` for the southeast corner of said addition bears East, a distance of 58.32 feet; THENCE with the centerline of the beforementioned fifteen foot(15') easement, the following courses and distances to wit: South 25°43'43" West, a distance of 271.05 feet to a point for corner; South 70925'36" West. a distance of 167.65 feet to a point for corner; South 01°40'44" East, a distance of 114,00 feet to a point for corner; South 21°02'38" West, a distance of 539.35 feet to a point for corner; South 00°25'22" West, a distance of 787.58 feat to a point for corner; South 11°39'02" West, a distance of 176.45 feet to a point for the beginning of a non- tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of 29°08'50", a radius of 300.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of South 81°53'51" West, 150.97 feet; Westerly with said curve, an arc distance of 152.61 feet to a point for the beginning of a compound curve to the right, having a central angle of 01926'33", a radius of 1980.17 feet end a chord bearing and distance of North 82°48'28" West, 49.85 feat; Westerly with said curve, an arc distance of 49.85 feet to a point for the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a central angle of 23°46'Q9", a radius of 300.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of South 86°01'44" West, 123.56 feet; Westerly with said curve, an arc distance of 124.46 feet to a paint for corner; South 38°14'45" West, a distance of 436,35 feet to a point for corner; South 86053115" West, a distance of 145.12 feet to a point in the centerline of an existing twenty foot (20') utility easement conveyed to the City of Southlake. Texas as recorded in Volume 9810, Page 560, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; 5/1 `7 4 „,o,azo42 1 P. F.M. HIGHWAY NO. 1709 1/2" I.R.F. li ... w00 va'S9'N 1970-57' TIMBER LAKE SECTION 1 CAB. A SLIDE484 1/2- I.R.F. 728.30- 600'2 •22'E AEPEAENCE BEARING 1/2' Z.R.F. N/ CAP SCALE: 1` = 300' POINT RfOF�v r ""`� —��` BF.BEGINNING � EAST 50.32• 70,,,. / ti • 57025'WV SDI'40'44•E 1 167,65. 114.00• (0 50' TEMPORARY " I CONSTRUCTION ESMT. I.' . 'J.., ((// 210.99 ACRES fI II 1/ SOUTIIL4KE JOINT VENTURE i" (! VOL. 9719 PG. 599 If D.R.T.C.T. m / 71 _w /I�/ 0 4 ��/ �co II m 4 II APPROVED PILSWXIIIARY PLOT °1 W N• (it TIMBER LANE SECTION 2 11! v lA II 1 \\. n 1 1\\ EXISTING 20' UTILITY ESMT. TO \\ THE'CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TEXAS ��VOL. MO PG. 560 1 0 35' SANITARY \\` I SEVER EASEMENT P. L.24 I. 0 14.ca-se6ros',44-a 11 0 --_ 0 ."~ ... tr300.00 Arm 08•50- L-152.62' C8-seS'S3'S!'M /7, �1-1980.17• A•01'2G'33• \\ C-49.0$• �( S06'53'15'14 f45-12' ((' 11 ri . 11 (r J1 CENTENNIAL BLVD. EXHIBIT B SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TIMBER LAKE 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS TEE NELSON CORPORATION !Atm PLANNING • II1Ci11E,Rn(a• SURVEYING 5988 SONIO:RSIDE AR. SUITE 202 DAILIS.TEXAS(214)900-2005 PAX(214)360-2009 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Sa-9 4 to........7 9 • • 0 ;--7-7--•-:.---4.. ri 11 N I k 9 I......ILL r StlOrY.....51".. •. . . TIMBER LAKE _ .. [ SeCT1011 i ' ‘‘‘‘‘ ) :•- ( .... . : ( • (1r.' ••11. / i i 1 I i/ : -‘ff. ••-• ; I„ ':. : . I '-.1----..2.";-. :-.. --f - • i:- _., . . ! .i /- , .i .1.. •_,,. .1,, :) \,, . .7. '''•,... . : i. ,___, 1 • . rr------:- .„r 1 di,,,...,..„,...: .,. ..:„.....-... .......,..,,,.. ..r... ..,,, .: , . :.., ,, / , 42...- .,,. 11.4 t••4 11 ' - '. 7 ' .2. • -- '.,‘‘! :,"•5.1.,/. =1.‘:•• ''' •...../ , .1; j • i." 8 .1 .7 :: 1 1 •!•••. te • k , , • 1 i.. .., . -j.,7-' .:.'zian,____. . k 8; •V •,'44.•-•• 4.1'-'. -----.1 '•,,__ ,... G). -- t. : __.._41) 1.- :i. . i ,, ,. :•-•,..c.v.,,-• .ir , • tt....., / • . 2, 1 :—- ..ii--.=-r,/ : : 1 ( •C.,,. -t. ,..."/"; ., .....%•":" j, --1 .I I \ •i • 1 i il i% 1./ /Cy,'" L. 1.- j i.. :I;. .) .1! .. . .114 :,...,'lc .,-.,'•i\ 1,4111 N i ...--i •I i .t., i -;.-3-- -.-.-• „-. 1 ' 1 y..; ',.. 1.7-7-11 1 i : i ii.i .-.-.- 44• 4,_, L --'7' \_. '1 ••1 Al H I : - „J..,--. _L.. _.• i :..._. .•• t..4,r .4./ :,...,.,„; N• -,\‘,...,'•---.\,.-.. ,..•,''.‘. ,,•.\..\...71....,\I.,..„'-.5-..,"/,;i J.t....,1,,.!,'t;:• .'I.Ii.".-...--.'.,__I:-I.•..l:: 1111e,/,•--,,•,...:.,.;1 ----.=---_'- ',-:.---- :___ e• ,—..-• - i !1;t, f••..._ di.Z.-.141P '1 `,______- \ p. . , , ____,, ..,,,„ . ,4 /V i • i I 1 .-.- _ .• ••'‘ t• :./ . • ',, 'IT .' /. r e , •- • s, ' •' .:7 1 ...:4.5.--1/1 i ..;•::::....;:. ;i 1":•.%O._:.!..-;‘ 1...., 1 . T. ), .•• •- -..., ---__ \ •it' 1 .• .... ...:.--\ _ ,,•.: t, -,,:.•&,,,.... : ifr, --•i • I. '''.4 .. bi . ..........i \ a: • -• • i'41 ,,11: i hit-T.—\ ',.. 0 •//r 1.-1 7-• • , : i•, ,•_•••.::-:/•\.„ :/11 i ... • 'de. til ; .•, /.Y,/. ; . •.: : "—it-, -t------, .. 1''' ili '..•, i a :, „_ 1 .t.' e; 0 -. '''\\k. • ..1, .-,..-...,p ,,, .4,, ... : 01 • .,-- •,..- • , .....- , \......,:- •...._ , t ks c,-,.., ........-•, , r., - . a .. \N- As'N, 1,:,;',...1 ..:..'_._.. 1.%.---•:----Cri V -d........ .-- c .. !. .--.1 ....t._ :ral: 1 sslt, -. .= •.,. :i 1.;,... ,\ 01, r , , A..0\ .- ' ---:•-•-=- \ :It - , .. i • :1 - ) I s , • •• \ .."•• ;,..-Vi.! A...‘--:-\ A '•• \ k-\ , I : ... \‘ --:\'4,4_:,i 4 \y•\. . \\. .q...\--. -,c.--s..,s..\,,...::.......•__ :: ., - :::•.. ti.,.. i___.,..t/___ 'I' .,, .• : -- ‘11 -:--NI • ''''''14:3"„,--",,o0e.\• .. .'1.' i..6),I- t.‘i.'."-\,-. \'.,•./ - . :I/, : . 1 ..............i ."...,......--.,,.,-..,. ....‘`. ..‘,__"-'. / b4k . t i' \ • i • ---.: 1; •I, r .:., e,........., i e. •.•••••___(___--- i 1 ". ,.: ..,,iva.c:,:_;......- :„, ., \ ..... . \ • .... -_,— „ ......., , • •••, . ...-.• . .••1.,. - ,._...------ .._--,.1-- /• k.c . , ...---. s‘. • ..... ,<•,',, ••:.:.0 • ""...r..... '_._," ' - -• . .. ," 1 .....-.(—`,"\ I .....1-- t"\• •-- '•,:.''0 . \ . *-. ,,...--- .., • ..•f.•-.; ,.• --.7,• - --.'".t.'-"ftc ..4,.:' —_-.,--1.. / ›. . .,..,, . .•- \>WN's. \ku Il . .. '• ''......• ..:1.1 1./ 12V7y1. ;' ' • . ,. „ 1 •,-i 1 t .2. 1 _ „.•--.. - " V:s ".').- Vv. . :-......-::- / " --------',1-- , I - • 1 t . ,..'4 .10.g7.\-._____:_-,,..---... -• z, 7 - : __ .- - . ,..... - -- - ' • . , ,„,.,.,....,... „„,.,:: / . r • • frt: _...-. , „-...,...... -. ii'; -7.- - I ,1 ' 1 i t..\ • - -. .. , of /-/ - •.. cc‘.. , _,1 „,._....._.. ...... ., ,..0 - .- ..!.. ) ,z-i .. %• 'Lc'*..!:.IV:.... ,..... ,..... /. I-...; ' ,,a., - 1 7 ; / , • , •..... ,.......„,.:. ,• :,,,,,•‘• . ,, • •,• ,v_.). -,• • ; :I i •:1-- - ' .::4'.,<. A' I .7)--- 44/ y I \ 1,/. "--7.1 ' ,...'.•' ; . .:',...... • / / .•;3:1; ...... .1-• ' ,. / ...- .4 • .......------' •• .1 / y'' •-•.14j r ,' i . - ': I). - • 1, . 1 s ! -...r....-1.-‘ :.,...- • . % : Ai...rE M SI .. ii: •'- •-- --e ... i .. " 1E13.LW: --4 ..•••••••• • , ' 7--- -.7•. - \'• • r•'. •• .1:-...f, 3'.•F.---,--:::f....-.....,... -------.4---7.-7.-..,;. '.--77..=------:-- ---- .................4.12...........-.--........ .......-• • lb . ) Li VP :' • w cc.a.4T.t.)tr 9 \ ...-:•I ----6 .'I-7) 7• r. t( ,..-CPCXX SCIP/CY.•aST.HI .\ -.. • t! ; • 1: • l•. „ :-7,...:7..2.-4-V'•. i t .. . ' • : .C.7.: •.'. t 1 t• ,.... OFFSITE 5A1.11TAY 5eWEig , 5/9-to City of Southlake, Texas • • MEMORANDUM CM MANAGER 671`173 I May 13 , 1993 To : Curtis Hawk, City Manager From: Chris Terry, Asst . to the City Manager Subject : Ordinance No. 583, 2nd Reading, a • Franchise Agreement with Sammons Cable Co. for Cable Service in Parts of Southlake Ordinance No . 583 is an agreement between the City of Southlake and Sammons Cable Co. to provide cable service to portions of the City of Southlake. Mr. Tom Soulsby, General Manager of Sammons Cable Co . appeared before City Council at the 1st reading to respond to questions and describe cable service operations under the proposed franchise agreement . Sammons currently serves approximately 47 homes near the Southlake/Keller border. Sammons was providing service to residents in western sections of the City at the time these areas were annexed in 1988 . City Council approved 1st reading of Ordinance No. 583 at the April 6, 1993 regular meeting. Ordinance No. 583 was tabled at the April 20 , and May 4 , 1993 City Council meetings at the request of Sammons Cable Co. Staff is requesting that this item be tabled until the June 1, 1993 meeting to allow time for resolution of concerns relating to indemnification. • CT n/‹ V 7' - City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 10, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance 480-K Amending Zoning Ordinance, Section 7 .5 Building Permit Issuance On Lots Without Access Staff has been asked to issue a building permit for a platted lot which does not front on a public or private street which meets City standards . The case currently before us is Spring Oaks Addition, North of Dove and East of Ridgecrest . Although, this particular case created our dilemma, the ordinance is written to cover all such cases for residential permits . The added wording in the section is shown in the redline format . Feel free to call if you have any questions . The City Council approved the first reading on May 4, 1993 . Please place this item on the Council agenda for consideration. GL/gj attachment : Zoning Ordinance No. 480-K Spring Oaks Addition Exhibit C:\CD\GREG\MEMO\SPRING2.MEM I8-I r. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BY REVISING REGULATIONS REGARDING ACCESS TO LOTS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR • PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. t_ ' e City of Southlake, Texas is a ho •e rule city acting under ' - .rter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as the zoning ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake now deems it necessary to amend Ordinance No. 480, as amended, to specifically authorize the construction of a residential building on approved platted lots; and WHEREAS, the City Council has given published notice and held public hearings with respect to the amendment of the zoning ordinance as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS: SECTION 1 That Section 7.5 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.5 LOTS TO HAVE ACCESS -- Every building or structure hereafter erected, reconstructed, altered or enlarged or moved onto a h` `5z lot shall shordinanc\zoning-r ord(033193) (rrfllincd to show changes) 7 /3 d, r - be on a lot adjacent to an approved public or private street and shall be so located so as to provide safe and convenient access for servicing, ::fire protection and required off-street arkin .:::: `otom }} :: }} } <.t; 1 o sly.:..... .. .::. .:::::r.:{.}r:{.:.::::.:.::::::::.:::.:::.:::x :. a >�:ultur�xl:<::: �:>;�5::>nt�f::>:�.�:0nfi::<fa::::a�i :�:': �:d��dl �'tr�.C... �... � :�.... ....................f :11.11111111AMPIREMINMENEVIWIRMENNI ...::•::.}:::gilkO ri .:an :: x d titig dlei :: c a...... :: . : .: d.: ..:tikt O... . sz n::.4 any>other>ea ilt:{or a t<<o >> l re eai sfi is t t .;;......;..}'.x•;;:::.;.•.}jiv{.}':J'r'i{{;:v......v..�::{.�:.}v{.}'::.:..r.:+":-"r'+,Lt;:}}.....::{4}}:{•:^}iY iii:};y.}.;:.::. .....n.. .:fir.r. .. SECTION 2 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 3 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. sl\ordinanc\zoning-r.orci(033L93) '7 6.3 (rcdlincd to show changes) SECTION 4 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 5 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of this ordinance or any other ordinances affecting utilities which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 6 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 7 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally Ibrainanc\zoaing-r.cca(033193) /B_1. (it-Alined to show changes) publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 8 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 1993. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF ; 1993. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: ' slbrdinanc\zoning-r.ord(033193) /U -5 (redlined to show changes) AKKANT - I - — � j 7 ,wna c 3arna.�tE 7T CAC M, QC E. 1 • ©ado® ©.5.i./rty 1,f 7. ' -4-4.8air'. 11111 j. \ RAI 1A !Wine all so al\FA.PX RD CAST 1`�. '`* !' - ,---- 4 '1 . , / ' ' . - - - - -".2...-- - - -- 0 P_ _ it___,_ "F. . . g- ad \ [ _ \22 2B } 1 2c1 I / i SA. 10 iti OP 1. . 1 0 �y L 3A4 ( EI ©. [PRICE E • 2F7 3A18 3 St1R A-1207 3A4A ?ale 3H1A i 23' •I 1 1 3� 31I1, 2Fa SAIA1 2� L — -- 381 -- -- - - \12C _- _ I3A3A IC 1C1c 1C aL�" -- _- 1 - lCt— 1C1H , - •.71. M.1 A oil 3A2x j ; C1E1A1 I iC'- ,.. 41gElA• g 1C1E1 I .; 2 IE2 1C3 �s11 -- �y� • r� c.Rj� 1C2 1C1E1B 1 1 n'�0J1+ ---- 1E .allitr.All g [� K. C��I nA I J L M. S L. A( II sum€r A-.z5F0 a 1CiD l. 1 1e1 1C FI J.N1 itip®S .. , 201 I p i 41114 1 1E 1D F lA I I 2B1A TE11U1 = 1 1 1A1 `g 1H 1B IFJA 1 is • 1d * nova �- 1 41111 . --- - -L -- 1Flj-- J 3/' Iry� lA3J 183C ' 1B2 � �B iBi1 - - � 11 j� I 1/ 1 1 ' 19 1 MB ` i l A1A ^ d 1 Al W 1F I 1 A 1 ok -li�F1C 1A IAtA W -- W I lA2 - 1A1D � ,1 � I 1 �_ wIN 1A18 I 1A2 1B5C �}�°- • lea r 1 2A1 & 1 � u 1 J. WI EST I lc 1 2 I ul &2A2 SURb£l' A-16S0 lA ��� 1 • I \\ 1 I City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 13 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 585 - TREE PRESERVATION Draft Number Six, Dated 5/18/93 After many months of research and review, the Planning and Zoning Commissioners and Staff are pleased to forward the Tree Preservation Ordinance for your review. Following is a summary of ' s ' he ordinance : 1 The "Protected Tree" size is 8" diameter. This protects the majority of mature trees . 2 . Not all trees 8" or larger are protected, only those on the Quality Tree list or Marginal Tree list . (See definitions . ) 3 . The City must also meet the requirements but is not required to obtain a permit . 4 . Franchise utility companies must obtain a permit prior to removing or pruning trees in existing public R.O.W. 5 . All areas within R.O.W. and easements as shown on a Final Plat of a development are exempted from the requirements . This means that trees may be removed as necessary to put in the streets, drainage and utilities . 6 Residential homeowners are exempted from this ordinance. 7 Builders may remove trees as necessary to build house, driveway, sidewalks, etc. No other trees can be removed without permit approval . 8 A variety of exceptions (Section 3 . 6) have been provided for practical reasons . 9 . The ordinance is set up to be administered by a "Landscape Administrator" which is defined in the Landscape Ordinance as "The City Manager or his designee" . It would be my recommendation to train the building inspections staff to enforce this ordinance with myself as problem solver. ' 0 . Section 6 . 2 defines several prohibited activities within the critical root zone (CRZ) of a protected tree . Associates ORDINANCE NO. 585 - TREE PRESERVATION Draft Number Six, Dated 5/18/93 May 13 , 1993 Page 2 11 . A variety of protection methods are either required or recommended. (Sections 6 . 4 and 6 . 5) 12 . Violations will be based on every tree removed as another violation. During the process we sent a draft copy to each of the following for their review. We have incorporated their comments as appropriate in the draft . Bedford, Scott Barnett Carter & Burgess, Don Allen Colleyville, Lea Ann Layne Dixtor Intnl. , Tom Mathews Denton, Frank Robbins Drews Realty, John Drews Euless, Rod Tyler Larry Cole Co. , Larry Cole Flower Mound, Van James Maguire Thomas Partners,Richard Kuhlman Grapevine, Tommy Hardy Mobil Land Dev. ,Steve Yetts Hurst, John Pitstick Nelson Corp. , Craig Curry Keller, John Webb Southlake Props. , Phil Jobe Waco, William R. Falco Goodwin & Marshall, Pete Henderson Westlake, Scott Bradley Washington & Assoc. , Darryl Perry West University Place, Neslihan Bilir Tesno Denton Co. Ext. Service, John Cooper Jerry Farrier Tarrant Co. Ext. Service, Jan Hoelscher Sally Hall Texas Ag. Ext. Service, Mike Waltersheidt Barbara Atkins Texas Forest Service, Don Mueller Frank Dorer Texas Forest Service, Larry Schapfeld Conner Lam Harron Cablevision, Kevin G. Lyngaas Tri-County Electric, Paul Spears Lone Star Gas Co. , Engineering Dept. G. T. E. , Engineering Dept. Southwestern Bell, Engineering Dept. TU Electric, John Ellis Attached you will find a Tree Ordinance Summary matrix of several cities and a copy of the Grapevine Ordinance for your reference. Please place this on the Council agenda for their consideration. GL/gh Attached: Tree Preservation Ordinance Tree Ordinance Matrix Grapevine Tree Ordinance C:\GLORIA\WPFILES\PLANNER\TRE_PRES.MAY REL r%2c.-ti- ikHC.E a) a) a) C.O ri F N R i ,�is t-i i6 c = '7 \ h.r\ihJ+CAA Q) c E c. O O Overiew nc,._ 5/i2/`t3 E (°n CD aa _ m 0 Q Reviewed Adopted/Draft Ordinance D D A A A D A Length (number of pages) 25 19 5 15 7 13 5(A1) Freestanding Ordinance N Y N N N Y Y Responsible Authority Plan Dir B.1. Plan Dir Plan Dir B.O. Dev Dir Arborist Appeal Decision to P&Z P&Z P&Z P&Z BC(1) P&Z P&Z Applicability Public Property Y Y N Y N Y Y R.O.W./Easements N Y N Y Y N Y Existing Commercial Development N N Y Y N Y Y Proposed Commercial Development Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Existing Single Family\Residential N N N N N N Y Proposed Single Family\Residential N Y Y N Y Y Y Nurseries/Agricultural Land Y N N Y N Y N Utility Companies N Y Y Y N Y Y Diseased Trees (Exempted) Y Y Y Y(1) N Y(3) Y Permit Process Permit Required to Remove Tree Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Approving Body Plan Dir LJA Plan Dir Plan Dir B.O. Dir Dev Arborist Site Plan/Plat to be Submitted Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Building Permit Witheld Until Approval Y N N Y Y Y N Mitigation/Replacement Protected/Preferred Tree List Y Y Y N Y(2) N Y Escrow Account Available N N N N N N(1) N Protection Threshold (caliper inches) Y Y Y Y N Y Y Significant Stands Protected N N N N N Y Y Replacement Trees Required Y Y Y N N Y Y Construction Sites Bark Protection Y Y N N N Y Y Flagging Required Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Fencing Required Y Y N N N Y Y Other Elements Historical/Trophy Trees Protected Y N N N N Y Y Tree Survey Prior to Ordinance Adoption Y N N N N N N Staff Arborist/Landscape Architect Required N N N N N N Y Dripline and Trenching Provisions Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Tree Location Can Preclude Building Placement Y N N N Y Y Y Notes: L/A-Landscape Administrator(can be Planning Director or Building Official) BC(1) -Building Commission Y(1) -At Planning Director's Discretion Y(2) -Bedford provides a list of undesirable trees Y(3) -Subject to approval by Director of Development N(1) -Allowed to plant off site as a type of transfer right. (A1) -Significant portions of Austin document are contained in a separate document to which the ordinance makes reference. This is done to facilitate revisions to the standards without amending the ordinance. SR -3 • GRAPEVLNE CODE be rriainzained by and deeded to a homeov.-ners' association, or a trustee. No plat or master development plan containing a reser- vation of private open space and recreational areas shall be ap- proved until the applicant shall have filed with the zoning ad- ministrator a declaration of the covenants and restrictions that will govern such association or trustee, and received approval of the same from the planning and zoning commission and the city council. Such instrument shall be approved by the city attorney as to legal form and effect. and by the planning and zoning commission as to the suitability of the proposed use of the pro- posed open space and recreational areas. The covenants and restrictions. when submitted, shall provide for establishment of the homeowners' association or trust prior to the sale of any part of the property; that open space restrictions and maintenance shall be permanent: that the homeowners are liable for the payment of maintenance fees and capital assess- ments; that unpaid homeowners' fees and assessments wi1Lbe a lien on the property of the delinquent homeowners: that the association or trustee shall be responsible for liability insurance. taxes and perpetual maintenance: that membership shall be man- datory for each homeowner and any successive buyer: and. that each homeowner. at the time of purchase.shall be furnished with a copy of the approved restrictions or conditions. (Ord. No. 84-16. § 2iE). 4-9-34: Ord. No. 55-19, § 1(F), 4-16-85; . Ord. No. 55-33. § ItC), 8-20-85: Ord. No. 85-85, § 1(B), 12-17-85: Ord. No. 86-46. § 1(Ei, 15-56: Ord. No. 86-77;§ 2, 12-16-86: Ord. No. 87-58, § 1(E), 9-15-8 7) Sec. 52. Tree preservation. G L PP E V N E A. Purpose: The purposes of this section are to establish rules and regulations governing the protection of trees and vegetation cover within the City of Grapevine. to encourage the protection of healthy trees and vegetation and to provide for the replacement and replanting of trees that are necessarily removed during con- struction. development or redevelopment. The provisions of this section allow trees located within neces- sary public rights-of-way and easements to be removed prior to jupp. No. 3- 2226.98.6 H • APPENDIX 0—ZONING 4 52 issuance of a building permit. Upon issuance of a building per- mit. trees within the buildable area of a property may also be removed. All ocher tree removal requires a tree permit. B. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to this chapter: I. Buildable area That portion of a building site exclusive of the required yard areas on which a structure or building improvements may be erected, and inciudine the actual structure, driveway. parking lot, pool_ and other construc- .tion as shown on tne site pear.. 2. Drip line: A vertical line run through the outermost por- tion of the crown of a tree and extending to-the ground. 3. Historic tree:A tree which has been found by the city to be - of notable historic interest because of its age, type. size or historic association and has been so designated as part of the official records of the city. S. Person: ri. corporation. partnership. association or orne: artificial enztty: or any indi icuai: or any agent or em- ployee of the foregoing. 5. Specimen tree: A tree which has been determine:i by the city to be of high value because of its type. size. or other • professional criteria. and which has been sc• des: :ated a; • part of the official record of the city. 6. Tree: Any self-supporting woody perennial plan: which has a trunk diameter of tnree (31 inches or :yore wnur, measured at a point of four and one•haif :• feet ao•:ve ground level and which normally attains an ovaraz: net_:_ of at least twenty i2O1 feet at maturity. usual! a•..: one• main stem or trunk and many branches. it may aore_r have several stems or trunks as In several varieties of oar: 7. Yard area: The Iront, side and rear yard areas as required under the comprehensive zoning code and tne zoning dis- trict requirements applicable inereto C. Applicability. The terms and Provisions of this section shal. apply to real property as follows Supp. No. 36 2226.99 t{ -5 6 5_' GRAPEVINE CODE 1. All real property upon which any designated specimen or historic tree is located 2. All vacant and undeveloped property 3. All property to be redeveloped, including additions and alterations. 4. The yard areas of all developed property. excluding devel- oped and owner-occupied single-family residential property. 5. All easements and rights-of-way except those included in a plat approved by cry council shah meet the terms and provisions of this section. D. Tree preservation permit required No person. directly or indirectly,shall cut down.destroy.remove or move,or effectively destroy through damaging. any tree, specimen tree or historic tree situated on property described above without first obtaining a tree permit unless the conditions of Section 52.G.1 and 52.G.2 apply. E. Application.. Permits for removal. or replacement of trees covered herein shall be obtained by making application on a form prescribed by the city to the director of community development. The application shall be accompanied by a preliminary plat show- ing the exact location. size :trunk diameter and height) and corn- • • mon name of ail trees to be removed. The application shall also be accompanied by a written document indicating the reasons for removal or replacement of trees and two(2i copies of a legible site plan drawn to the Largest practicable scale indicating the following: 1. Location of ail e:ct:tint or proposed structures. improve- ments and site use:. properly dimensioned and referenced to proper:: lines. setback ana vary reau:rements and spe- cial reiattonsht;.- • 2. Existing and prnnosed site elevation. Qrades and major Contour_ 3. Location of existing or proposed utility easements. 4 The location i- tree.-: on the site to be removed. or replaced. . Supp. No. 36 2226.100 APPENDC: D—ZONING 52 5. Tree tnfor:nat:on required above shalii be summarized in le:-.-end form on the plan and shall include the reason for the proposed rernoya1, or replacement. 6 Application involving developed properties may be based on drawings showing only that portion of the site dtrectiy involved. adjacent structures. and landscaping or natural c-row-th incidental therct<. 7. Aerial photographs. at an appropriate scale. may be sub- stituted. at the discretion of the director of community development. for a site plan if adequate site information is supplied on the aerial photog-raph_ F. Appiicarwn review: Upon receipt of a proper application.the planning and zoning commission shall review the application for new subdivisions, the director of community development shall review applications for platted lots: said review may include a field inspection of the site, and the application may be referred to such departments as deemed appropriate for review and recom- mendations. If the application is made in conjunction with a site plan submitted for approval, the application will be considered as part of the site plan: and no permit shall be issued without site plan approval. Following the review and inspection. the permit applications will be approved.disapproved.or approved with condi- tions by the planning and zoning commission or director of com- munity development as appropriate. in accornance with the pro- visions of this chapter. G. Tree rernova. 1. No tree or trees shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit unless one of the following conditions exist: a. The tree is located in a utility or drainage easement or public street right-of-way as recorded on a plat ap- proved by the city council. In the event that certain trees outside the above areas or trees based partially outside the easement are requested to be removed to allow the operation of equipment. the applicant shall submit a plat and site plan which indicates the exact operation area needed. The director of community de- velopment may approve selected removal under this condition Supp. No. .,. 222o.1G i __ GP.APEVtNE CODE b. The tree is diseased. injured. in danger of fall ci . in te.f_res w-ith utility service. create_ unsafe vision clear- ance. or conflict_ with other ordinance: or regulations. c. Except for the above. under no circumstances shall there be clear cutting of trees on a property prior to issuance of a ouiiding _. Upon issuance of a ouiiatng permit. aeveiooers shall be aiiowe to remove trees located on the buiidaoie area o= tie property. Trees located in r ecutred yard areas. butlers ' and open space areas shall be maintained. The buildable area shall include- sufficient ad:acer.t area to allow the norrnai operation of construction equipment. H. Replacement- In the event that it is necessary to remove trees►outside the buildable area, the developer, as a condition to - issuance of a tree removal permit, may be required to replace the tree(s) being removed with comparable trees somewhere within the site. .A sufficient number of trees shall be planted to eaual. in call• pi.r. the diameter of the tree removed. Said reDiacement tree: shall oe a minimum of three i3i incnes caliper and seven l 7 1 lee: in height. when planted. and shall be selected from the list of approved replacement trees maintained by the director of corn- -1-unity de•:e.aprhent as approved by the planning and zonir . !;tirr.is:1on from the recommendations oI the county extension .t the r,r-re of application review. the person responsible Ior replacement. time of reDiacement and ideation will be determined by the planning and zoning commiss:: 1. r:..r croon. During any construction or land deveto_• ment. the developer shall clearly mark all trees to be maintained and may Dr required to erect and maintain protective oarrter: around all such trees or groups of trees. The developer shall not allow the movement of equipment or the storage of equipment. materials, debris or fill to be placed within the drip line of any tree. • Uurint: tnr canstructfon stage of development. the developer male not allow c can ng or equipment or material under the canopy or :thy trey or group of trees to remain. `ertner shall _hi- Stpp. No. 2226.102 APPENDIX D—ZONtNC 5 33 developer allow the disposal vf any waste material such as. bu: not limited CO. paint. oil. solvents. asphalt. concrete. mortar. etc.. under the canopy of any tree or groups of tree to remain. No attachment or wires of any kind, other than those of a protective nature. shall be attached to any tree. J. Exceotinns. In the event that any tree shall be determined to be in a hazardous or dangerous condition so as to endanger the public health. welfare or safety, and require immediate removal without delay. authorization may be given by the director of community development and the tree may then be removed with- out obtaining a written permit as herein required. During the period of an emergency such as a tornado, storm. flood or other act of God, the requirements of this ordinance may be waived as may be deemed necessary-by the city council. All licensed plant or tree nurseries shall be exempt from the terms and provisions of this Section only in relation to those trees planted and growing on the premises of said license.which are so planted and growing for the sale or intended sale to the genera'. public in the ordinary course of said licensee's business. Utility companies franchised by the city may remove trees which endanger public safety and welfare by interfering wit utility service. except chat where such trees are on owner-occupied properties developed for one-family use. disposal of such trees shall be at the option of the property owner. K. Exemption. This ordinance shall not apply co any develop. meat which has received final plat approval prior to the effective date of this ordinance. A permit shall not be required for a builder to satisfy final grading standards of the building code of the City- of Grapevine. (Ord. No. 84•16. § 2(E). 4-9-54: Ord. No. 85-19, § 1(G). 4-16-85. Ord. No. 87-16, § 1. 3-17-S7 Sec. 53. Landscaping regulations. A. Puronse: It is the purpose of this section to establish certain regulations pertaining to iandscaaing within the City of Crap:• vine. Tnese regulations provide standards and criteria tor nev- landscaping w icn are intended to promote the value or property. Supp. No.36 2226.103 • ef?-�) TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE NO. J6:, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ESTABLISHING CRITERIA AND REGULATIONS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MATURE TREES; PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR PERMIT REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING A REVIEW PROCESS; PROVIDING FOR TREE PROTECTION AND REPLACEMENT; PROVIDING FOR RESTRICTIONS ON PRUNING AND PLANTING OF TREES; PROVIDING ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING • FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, trees are a valuable amenity to the urban environment and serve to create greater human comfort by providing shade, cooling the air and otherwise tempering the effect of summer heat, thereby reducing the requirements for air conditioning and the -subsequent depletion of scarce energy resources; and WHEREAS, trees purify the air by filtering pollutants and dust and release oxygen into the air; and WHEREAS, trees protect land and structures by reducing run-off, binding soil and minimizing flood damage; and WHEREAS, trees are known to add dollar value to residential and commercial property and to increase income levels and tax revenues by attracting new business, industry and residents through improving a city' s image; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to actively participate in the "Tree. City U.S .A. " program and the "Keep Southlake Beautiful" , program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has determined that tree preservation is necessary to'- adequately protect the public health, safety and welfare . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: (0 TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE 1 . 0 PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this ordinance is to encourage the preservation of mature trees and natural areas, to preserve protected trees during construction and to control the removal of protected trees when necessary. It is the intent of this ordinance to achieve the following: - Prohibit the indiscriminate clearing of property. - Protect and increase the value of residential and commercial properties within the City. - Maintain and enhance a positive image for the attraction of new business enterprises to the City. - Protect healthy quality trees and promote the natural ecological environmental and aesthetic qualities of the City. 2 . 0 DEFINITIONS 2 . 1 GENERAL RULES : For the purpose of this ordinance, the following rules shall be applied in constructing, interpreting or otherwise defining the terms and provisions hereof : a. Words used in the present tense shall include the future, words used in the singular number shall include the plural number and words used in the plural shall include the singular. b. The word "shall" is mandatory and the word "may" is permissive . 2 . 2 DEFINITIONS : For the purpose of this ordinance, certain words or terms applicable hereto are defined as hereinafter provided. Words and terms used in this ordinance, but not defined in this ordinance shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance or other ordinances of the City. Words and terms defined in two ordinances shall be read in harmony unless there exists an irreconcilable conflict in which case the definition contained in this ordinance shall control . BUILDABLE AREA: That portion of a building site exclusive of the required yard areas on which a structure or building improvements may be erected and including the actual structure, driveway, parking lot, pool and other construction as shown on a site plan. BUILDING PAD : The actual foundation area of a building and a reasonable area around the foundation necessary for construction and grade transitions . CRITICAL ROOT ZONE : The area of undisturbed natural soil around a tree defined by a concentric circle with a radius equal to the distance from the trunk to the outermost portion of the dripline . (See Appendix 'D' . ) CUT/FILL: Areas where the natural ground level has been excavated (cut) to a depth of 4 " or greater or earth deposited (fill) to a depth of 4 " or greater. DRIP LINE : A vertical line run through the outermost portion of the canopy of a tree and extending to the ground. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION: A delineation on the graphic exhibit which shows the boundary of the area within which all construction activity will occur. MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC DOMAIN PROPERTY: Examples of this would include City Hall, public parks, Corps of Engineers property, State of Texas R.O.W. , library, fire stations, water tower sites or similar properties . PROTECTIVE FENCING: Snow fencing, chain link fence, arbed wire fence, orange vinyl construction fencing or other similar fencing with a four foot (4 ' ) approximate height . TREE : Any self-supporting woody perennial plant which will attain a trunk diameter of three (3) inches or more when measured at a point four and one-half feet (4 . 5 ' ) above ground level and normally an overall height of at least twenty (20) feet at maturity, usually with one (1) main stem or trunk and many branches . It may appear to have several stems or trunks as in several varieties of oaks . TREE, MARGINAL: A tree which the City has determined may or may not be worthy of preservation depending on the individual characteristics of the tree . (See Appendix 'A' . ) TREE, PROTECTED: A specimen tree identified as a 'quality' tree by the City or a specimen tree in the 'marginal' category which the Landscape Administrator has determined should be saved due to individual characteristics of the tree . TREE, QUALITY: A tree which the City has determined typically has significant positive characteristics worthy of preservation. (See Appendix) TREE, SPECIMEN: A tree which has a diameter of 8" (Approx. 25" circumference) or greater at breast height, four and one-half feet (4 . 5 ' ) above the ground. The diameter of a multi-trunk tree shall be determined by adding the total diameter of the largest trunk to 1/2 the diameter of each additional trunk. (Appendix ' E' . ) TREE BOARD: Shall mean the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3 . 0 TREE-REMOVAL PERMIT REQUIRED 3 . 1 GENERAL: No person, directly or indirectly, shall cut down, destroy, remove or move, or effectively destroy through damaging, any protected tree situated on property regulated by this ordinance without first obtaining a tree-removal permit unless otherwise specified in this ordinance . 3 . 2 MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC DOMAIN PROPERTY: All municipal or public domain property shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. a. Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree, however protected trees to be removed must be shown on construction plans approved by the Landscape Administrator. 3 . 3 EXISTING R.O.W. AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS : All construction and maintenance activity within public R.O.W. or easements shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacementspecified herein. a. City Projects: The City shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein on all projects . 1 . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree, however protected trees to be removed must be shown on construction plans approved by the Landscape Administrator. b. Franchise and Other Utility Companies : All utility company projects shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. 1 . Permit requirements : A tree-removal permit must be obtained prior to the removal of a protected tree . This permit must be accompanied by a site plan or construction plan meeting the graphic exhibit requirements specified herein. It is anticipated that the franchise would include typical pruning, boring or other requirements to be met by their contractor in order to do the required work in the City. 3 . 4 NEW DEVELOPMENTS : All developments which have not submitted final construction plans as of the effective date of this ordinance shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. a. Residential Subdivisions : All area within public R.O.W. , utility easements or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat and areas designated as cut/fill on the master drainage ' construction plan approved by the Landscape Administrator shall be exempted from the requirements specified herein. All other area shall be subject to these requirements . 1 . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within said R.O.W. or easements, however a permit must be obtained prior to the removal of any other protected tree on the property. b. Non-Residential Developments : All area' within public R.O.W. , public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, and the fire lanes, parking areas and area within 12' of the building foundation as shown on an approved Site Plan shall be exempt from the requirements specified -herein. All other areas shall be subject to these requirements . 1 . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within an area noted in 3 .4-b _ above, however a permit must be obtained prior to the removal of any other protected tree on the property. 3 . 5 PRIVATE PROPERTY: - a. ' Agricultural : Property zoned 'AG' agricultural and being actively used agriculturally shall be exempt from the requirements specified herein. b: Homeowners : Individual homeowners shall be exempt from the requirements of this ordinance as it pertains to their ownership only. - c . Builders/Contractors : All builders who have not submitted a request for a building permit as of the effective date of this ordinance are subject .to the requirements herein. All area within the driveway , sidewalks, patios, septic tank and lateral lines, parking area, pool and associated deck area and , area within 12' of the building foundation as shown on an approved plot plan shall be exempt from the requirements of this ordinance. All other areas of the lot shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. 1 . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within the area noted in 3 . 5-c above, however a permit must be obtained prior to the removal of any other protected tree on the property. 3 . 6 EXCEPTIONS : A tree removal permit shall not be required under any of the following circumstances . a . Damaged/Diseased Trees : The tree is dead, diseased, damaged beyond the point of recovery, or in danger of falling as determined by the Landscape Administrator. This would include removal of a diseased tree by the city to reduce the chance of spreading the disease to adjacent healthy trees . b. Public Safety: The tree endangers the public health, welfare or safety and immediate removal is required. c . Utility Service Interruption: The tree has disrupted a public utility service due to a tornado, storm, flood or other act of God. Removal shall be limited to the portion of the tree reasonably necessary to reestablish and maintain reliable utility service . d. Business Interests : The following business ventures shall be exempt from the requirements specified herein as follows . 1. Landscape Nursery: All licensed plant or tree nurseries shall be exempt from the terms and provisions of this section only in relation to those - trees planted and growing on the premises of said licensee which are so planted and growing for the sale or intended sale to the general public in the ordinary course of said licensee' s business. 2 . Golf Course : Golf courses shall not require a tree removal permit for removal of protected trees within areas designated as tee boxes, fairways -or greens . All other areas shall be subject to the requirements specified herein. 3 . Quarries : All approved quarry operations shall be exempt from the requirements specified herein within the limits of the active operations . 4 . Other Business Interests : Other unforeseen business interests may be exempted from the requirements herein only when so stated in developer' s agreement or on a Concept Plan approved by the City Council . 3/1 -/5 4 . 0 PERMIT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS 4 . 1 AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW: The Landscape Administrator shall be responsible for the review and approval of all requests for all tree-removal permits submitted in accordance with the requirements specified herein. a. Deferrals : The Landscape Administrator may defer the approval of a tree removal permit to the Planning and Zoning Commission for any reason. All decisions made by the Commission shall be final . b. Appeals : Any decision made by the Landscape Administrator may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission. All decisions made by the Commission shall be final . 4 . 2 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS : The Landscape Administrator shall establish administrative procedures necessary to facilitate the implementation and enforcement of this ordinance . a. Tree-Removal Permit : A request for a tree-removal permit must be submitted and approved prior to the removal of any protected tree in the City. (See Appendix ' B' for example permit . ) b. Fees : All tree-removal permits shall be accompanied by a check made payable to the City of Southlake in the amount specified by City Council . c . Graphic Exhibit : All request for tree-removal permits must be accompanied by a graphic exhibit showing at least the following. These requirements _ may be modified by the Landscape Administrator as needed to administer this ordinance. Upon prior approval by the Landscape Administrator the graphic exhibit may be limited to only the applicable portion of the site . An aerial photograph may be allowed if it clearly meets these requirements . 1 . Appropriate title (i . e . Tree Removal Permit Exhibit . ) 2 . Title block includes street address, lot and block, subdivision name, city and date of preparation. 3 . North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. 4 . Name, address and phone of owner and person preparing the exhibit if different . 5 . Location of all R.O.W. lines and public easements . 6 . Location of all buildings, structures, pools and other improvements intended on the lot . 7 . Areas of cut/fill and flow lines shown. 8 . Limits of construction line shown if applicable . 9 . Location of tree (s) to be removed is tied down with dimensions from two nearest property lines . 10 . Caliper and common name of tree to be removed. 11 . Any required replacement trees shown with caliper size and common name of tree . d. Permit Validity: Permits for tree removal issued in connection with a building permit or site plan shall be valid for the period of that building permit' s or site plan' s' validity. Permit (s) for tree removal not issued in connection with a building permit or a site plan shall become void one hundred eighty (180) days after the issue date on the permit . 5 . 0 TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS 5 . 1 Tree Replacement : In the event that it is necessary to -remove a protected tree as specified in 3 . 0-3 . 5 herein, the applicant may be required to replace the protected tree (s) being removed with- quality trees as defined herein or canopy trees as recommended in the Landscape Ordinance. A sufficient number of trees shall be planted to equal, in - caliper, the diameter of the tree- removed. Said replacement trees shall be a minimum of 3 " caliper (at 1-' above ground) and 7 feet in height when planted. At the time of review, the agent responsible for replacement, the time of replacement and the location of the new trees will be determined by. the Landscape Administrator. The replacement trees shall be located on the subject site whenever possible, however if the applicant does not feel this is feasible, the Landscape Administrator has the authority to allow the planting to take place. on another property. Franchise utility companies shall be exempt from this requirement . 6 . 0 TREE PROTECTION A major purpose of this ordinance is to protect all quality trees which are not necessarily removed to allow approved construction to occur. The following procedures are required in the situations noted, however unique circumstances may be accommodated by the Landscape Administrator. 6 . 1 Construction Plan Requirements : All construction plans shall include the 'requirements noted in Appendix ' C' . 6 . 2 Prohibited Activities : The following activities shall be prohibited within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree subject to the requirements of this ordinance . a. Material Storage : No materials intended for use in construction or waste materials accumulated due to excavation or demolition shall be placed within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree . b. Equipment Cleaning/Liquid Disposal : No equipment shall be cleaned or other liquids deposited or allowed to flow overland within the limits of the critical root zone of a protected tree . This would include paint, oil, solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar or similar materials . c . Tree Attachments : No signs, wires or other attachments, other than those of a protective nature shall be attached to any protected tree . d. Vehicular Traffic : No vehicular and/or construction equipment traffic or parking shall take place within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree other than on an existing street pavement . Intent is to allow single incident access within the CRZ for purposes of clearing underbrush, establishing the building pad and associated lot grading. Also intend to allow vehicular traffic necessary for routine utility maintenance or emergency restoration of utility service . e . Grade Changes : No grade changes in excess of 4" (cut or fill) shall be allowed within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator. f . Impervious Paving: No paving with asphalt, concrete or other impervious materials in a manner which may reasonably be expected to kill a tree shall be placed within the limits of the critical root zone of a protected tree except as otherwise allowed in this ordinance . 6 . 3 Preserved Tree : A protected tree shall be considered to be preserved only if a minimum of 75% of the critical root zone is maintained at undisturbed natural grade and no more than 25% of the canopy is removed due to building encroachment . 6 . 4 Prior to Construction: At the discretion of the Landscape Administrator, the following alternative procedures shall be followed on all types of construction projects (i . e. residential subdivisions, commercial, multi-family, industrial developments, residential builders and municipal/public) . a. Tree Flagging: All protected trees on the subject property within forty feet (40 ' ) of a construction area or surface improvements such as driveway, walks, etc . shall be flagged with bright fluorescent orange vinyl tape wrapped around the main trunk at a height of 4 ' or more such that the tape is very visible to workers operating construction equipment . This shall not include the flagging of all protected trees adjacent to R.O.W. within approved residential subdivisions during the. construction of the roadway. b. Open Space Flagging: All trees or groups of trees within areas intended to be saved as open space shall be enclosed with fluorescent orange tape along all areas of possible access or intrusion by construction equipment . Tape shall be supported at a maximum of 25' intervals by wrapping trees or other approved methods. Single incident access for the purposes of clearing underbrush is allowed. c . Protective Fencing: In those situations where a protected tree is so close to the construction area that construction equipment will infringe_ on the root system, a protective fencing may be required between the tree and the construction activity. d. Bark Protection: In situations where a protected tree remains in the immediate area of intended construction, the tree shall be protected by enclosing the entire circumference of the tree with 2" x 4" lumber encircled with wire or other means that do not damage the tree . - The intent here is to protect the bark of the tree against incidental contact by large construction equipment . 6 . 5 Permanent Construction Methods : a. Boring: Boring of utilities under protected trees may be required in certain circumstances . When required the length of the bore shall be the width of the critical root zone at a minimum and shall be a minimum depth of 48" . In particular this requirement would typically pertain to franchise utility installations . b. Grade Change: In situations where the grade change within the critical root zone of a protected tree exceeds four inches (4" ) , the procedures noted in the City standard detail sheet shall be required. c . Trenching: All trenching where possible shall be designed to avoid trenching across the critical root zone of any protected tree . This shall not inhibit the placement of necessary underground services such as electric, phone, gas, etc . 1 . Root Pruning: It is recommended that all roots 2" or larger in diameter which are exposed as a result of trenching or other excavation shall be cut off square with a sharp medium tooth saw and covered with pruning compound within 2 hours of initial exposure . 7 . 0 TREE PRUNING RESTRICTIONS 7 . 1 General : No protected tree shall be pruned in a manner which significantly disfigures the tree or in a manner which would reasonably lead to the death of the tree. 7 . 2 Permit Requirements : All franchise utility companies shall be required to maintain at the City a set of pruning specifications (updated annually) to be followed by all pruning contractors working for the company within the City. Prior to beginning any pruning not requested by the owner of the tree, the contractor shall submit to the City a, pruning permit for approval . As allowed in section 3 . 6-c, utility companies may prune trees as necessary to re- establish disrupted electric service without obtaining a permit . 7 . 3 Allowed Pruning: The Landscape Administrator may approve pruning of a protected tree in cases where a protected tree must be pruned to remove branches broken during the course of construction, or where protected trees must be strategically pruned to allow construction of a structure. When allowed, all pruning shall be in accordance with approved Arboricultural techniques and the recommendations of Appendix 'G' . 7 .4 Required Pruning: The owners of all trees adjacent to public R.O.W. shall be required to maintain a minimum clearance of ten feet (10' ) above the traveled pavement or curb of a public street . The City shall also have the right to prune trees overhanging within Public R.O.W. as necessary to preserve the public safety. 8 . 0 TREE PLANTING RESTRICTIONS 8 . 1 Overhead Lines : Any required replacement trees shall not be planted within an area such that the mature canopy of the tree will interfere with overhead utility lines . 8 . 2 Underground Utilities : Any required replacement trees shall not be planted within an area such that the mature root zone of the tree will interfere with underground public utility lines . No trees shall be planted within ten feet (10 ' ) of a fire hydrant . 9 . 0 ENFORCEMENT 9 . 1 Developers Agreement : No developer' s agreement shall be approved which does not state that all construction activities shall meet the requirements of the tree preservation ordinance . 9 . 2 Building Permit : No building permit shall be issued unless the applicant signs an application or permit request which states that all construction activities shall meet the requirements of the tree preservation ordinance. The Building Official shall make available to the applicant a copy of the tree preservation ordinance or a condensed summary of the relevant aspects pertaining to the type of permit requested. 9 . 3 Acceptance of Improvements : No acceptance of public improvements shall be authorized until all violations have been paid to the City or otherwise relieved through the Municipal Court . 9 . 4 Certificate of Occupancy: No Certificate of Occupancy (C.O. ) shall be issued until all violations have been paid to the City or otherwise relieved through the Municipal Court . 10 . 0 VIOLATIONS Any person, firm, corporation, agent or employee thereof who violates any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction hereof shall be fined not to exceed Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($500 . 00) for each incident . Each protected tree shall be considered a separate incident and shall be subject to the maximum penalty of $500 . 00 per tree . 11 . 0 SEVERABILITY It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 12 . 0 CONFLICTING ORDINANCES This Ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City; and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any of such other ordinances except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, in such other. ordinance or ordinances are hereby repealed. 13 . 0 SAVINGS CLAUSE All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any ordinances affecting the regulations for installation of landscaping improvements which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts . 14 . 0 PUBLICATIONS CLAUSE The City Secretary of the City ,of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by section 3 . 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. 15 . 0 EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 16 :0 APPENDICES It is anticipated that the following appendices will be changed periodically by the Landscape Administrator in response to changes in the administration of this ordinance. APPENDIX 'A' - TREE SUMMARY The following is a summary of representative trees for each category of tree. QUALITY TREES Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes Pecan Carya illinoensis Pecan fruit, compound leaves Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Deciduous, 1"-2" dark green leaves Shumard Red Oak Quercus shumardii Deep pointed lobes in leaves Texas Red Oak Quercus texana Vertical multi-trunk shape Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1 1/2" dark green pointed leaves Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa Large acorn, leaf border at end Post Oak Quercus stellata Deep lobes, rounded tip on leaf Black Jack Oak Quercus marilandica Leathery 3"-7" leaf, no lobes Lacebark Elm Ulmus parvifolia Small dark serrated green leaves Chinese Pistache Pistacia chinensis 3" sickle leaflets, fall color Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Star shaped leaf Austrian Pine Pinus nigra Two needles Chinquapin Oak Quercus muhlenbergii Oblong 4"-6" serrated leaf Southern Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora Large evergreen Leaf, white flower Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum . Feather-like foliage, fall color Caddo Maple Acer barbatum 'Caddo' Five-lobed leaf Texas Hickory Carya texana Five leaflets, 1"-2" nut MARGINAL TREES Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes Cottonwood Populus deltoides Deep fissures in bark, heart shape leaf Mesquite Prosopis glandulosa Lacy open foliage, 10" bean fruit American Elm Ulmus americana 'V' shaped main branching Slash Pine Pinus elliotti Tall cylindrical shape Honeylocust Gleditsia triacanthos Lacy foliage, thornless variety only Japanese Black Pine Pinus thunbergii Twisted growth, dark green needles Western Soapberry Sapindus drummondii 18" compound leaf, 1/2" clear fruit Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Native, pyramidal shape Deodar Cedar Cedrus deodara Large pyramidal evergreen OTHER TREES OF CONCERN Although the following trees do not typically obtain the protected 8" size, the City would like to recommend that protective care also be considered for these trees: Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes Redbud Cercis canadensis Purple/white flower in spring Mexican Plum Prunis mexicana White flower, exfoliating bark,thorns Possumhaw Holly Ilex decidua Showy orange/red fruit, deciduous Golden Raintree Koelrutaria paniculata Yellow flower, panicled fruit Yaupon Holly Ilex vomitoria Evergreen, light bark, red fruit Cherry Laurel - Prunus caroliniana Glossy evergreen foliage, shrubby River Birch Betula nigra White flaky bark Eves Necklace Sophora affinis Dull green tear-dropped shape leaf EXHIBIT 'B' 03/18/93 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TREE-REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT NAME: LOT: BLOCK: STREET ADDRESS: OWNER CONTRACTOR/BUILDER NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: I hereby certify that this application meets the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and further certify that all construction pertaining to this project shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Signed: Title: Date: ************************************************************************************ For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of this application and the application fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 19 Signed: Title: ****************************************************.******************************** Shown Not GENERAL INFORMATION On Plan Applic. Appropriate title (i.e. Tree Removal Permit Exhibit) Title block includes street address, lot and block, subdivision name Title includes City and date of preparation North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity Name, address and phone of owner Name, address and phone of person preparing the exhibit Location of tree(s) to be removed is tied down with dimensions from two nearest property lines Location of all R.O.W. lines and public easements Location of buildings, structures, pools and other impovements Areas of cut/fill and flow lines Caliper and common name of tree(s) to be removed Any required replacement tree(s) shown with caliper size and common name of tree Limits of construction line shown Reason Tree Must Be Removed: ************************************************************************************ Permit for tree removal approved the day of , 19 By: Title: Notes: APPENDIX 'C ' CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS The following shall be required as a part of all construction plans submitted to the City when required by the Landscape Administrator. 1 . A Tree Preservation Detail Sheet shall include the following at a minimum: a. The requirements of sections 6 . 2 - 6 .4 shall be noted. b. A graphics legend to be used throughout the plans for the purposes of showing the following: Trees to be flagged, protective fencing, trees requiring bark protection, boring, areas of cut and fill impacting protected trees . c . Graphic tree exhibit showing the features of a tree to include the critical root zone, trunk, canopy, drip line and method of caliper measurement. d. Graphic exhibits showing methods of protection to include snow fences, boarded skirts, etc . e. Graphic exhibits showing construction methods to include grade changes, boring, trenching etc. f . Graphic exhibit showing appropriate pruning practices . 2 . All requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance shall be shown graphically on all applicable sheets within the construction plans . 3//- u15 APPENDIX ' D ' ' TREE EXHIBIT f----\-- .\-Th-\----17.-------Thn 1,77---‘---13 Cp\N °FT • A11110111111 i . .:I, If I, . Ith i! 1ih. , kill, i, .., ,folfrik , . iv I , , 2 ' T RuNK DRIP LINE l'C. �: %t, `ZO N E K 1T I c D.L R oOT z�� To O�ITERI'1O T '; Zo' 12APIUS -oft pRIP LINE CQNCENTRIG Gl c.1_ I I �i ..�J'V $^:P +•: •�._. ..;� •:t' J` i �.. ;..'"�� •gin'•' n� ` CRITICAL ROOT ZONE : The area of undisturbed natural soil around a tree defined by a concentric circle with a radius equal to the distance from the trunk to the outermost portion of the dripline. DRIP LINE : A vertical line run through the outermost portion of the canopy of a tree and extending to the ground. >N-k APPENDIX ' E ' METHODS OF TREE MEASUREMENT Lin- of Measurement Normal Line of Measurement Actual Line of Measurement 4'- 6" 4' - 6" I Vane ON A SLOPE IRREGULAR SWELLING (Requires Discretion) • • .▪.. : . :. Lines of Measurement: "' Line of • Measurement 4' 6▪" 4'-6" -MULTI-STEMMED TREE LEANING TREE Source: COA Diameter Measurement: The diameter of the protected tree shall be measured as shown. The diameter of a multi-trunk tree shall be determined by adding the total diameter of the largest trunk to 1/2 the diameter of each additional trunk. APPENDIX ' F' EXAMPLE BUILDER SITE PLAN r- o - - �10 u-TTL 'T'( tSMT. , — REPLACE MCNT �/ TRt� { YYP< 1.%1 O \ 1 I "opK ( +‹3O I >1 I \ 12" POST o k K `T O fd E -� REMOVED 3\43. PResE2vED TKeei3`( PERmIT RE4vT`(PICaL_ sT —/1\ \ IZ / L6 NDI, �`� V-c \\± / J )-- ! ` + EX15T1NC� THEE or[ Ti.EES TO Be = .To REMAIN W RE MOY ED I ° \ JT`(R tc a_ PRoPo6s0 }4 O U se — ge ri_kC E MENT T s s / I ( 4. \ —/\) ) _ TREES TO PEE / �� 4"LIVE o RK 'f"RED 9"-- > + d. pRIC ,�, a Q. 3 0 ►-- —---- — — —— 1R.o.uJ.— -o SIDW°cLY I Gtp.ss /� STREET TREE REMOVAL PERMIT REQUEST PREPARED BY OWNER: 2143 OAK ST. , SOUTHLAKE-4/18/93 MR. TREE SAVER 1913 SPRUCE ST. DALLAS, TX. 70418 PH. 214/240-2108 5'ia3 APPENDIX 'G' TREE PRUNING RECOMMENDATIONS • branch No Yes No bark ridge iir ir 46>1.. / 1 1 y 1 \\ ,` ' i `\ Yes 1 1 I collar 1 1 When removing a branch, always cut outside the Branches that do not have a distinct collar should be branch bark ridge and collar. Do not make a flush cut at a right angle to the branch outside the branch cut. bark ridge. e branches //4.... .--4--ac, branches i\ �' ------ - collar ;/ tom; /codominant , , sterns I �//,� ;,/�, 2 remove limb I 4l \\ ,� I `. 1 under cut bark `. 3 cut stub rides �l\Yes outside of collar When removing heavy limbs, first make-an Trees may have codominant stems, as shown on the undercut several inches outside of the collar. Then left. If a codominant stem must be removed, cut at remove limb by a second cut an inch or so outside of an angle outside of the bark ridge as shown in the the first cut. Remove stub with a third cut just insert at right. Avoid leaving any stub. outside of the collar. (Feucht, 1985) S • City of Southlake,Texas cfry ANAGER E M O R A N D U MSM May 13 , 1993 To: Curtis Hawk, City Manager From: Chris Terry, Asst . to the City Manager Subject : Resolution No. 93-42, An agreement in support of Joint Utilization between the City of Southlake and Carroll I.S.D. ; Setting out guidelines for the committee. The City Council was presented with a draft resolution establishing a Joint Utilization Committee at the 5/4/93 City Council meeting. The Joint Utilization Committee will be charged with the responsibility of exploring opportunities and methodologies to enter into joint use projects between the City of Southlake and the C. I .S.D Board of Trustees . The purpose of such an agreement is to pursue sharing of facilities, maintenance, equipment, research, and other cost saving measures to the benefit of both the two entities . The Commitee has already held two organizational meetings on 3/25/93 and 4/13/93 to begin work on projects of an immediate nature . The Committee feels that once this agreement is formally in place, project specific agreements which detail the procedures of special joint use projects may be entered into. Current members of the Joint Utilization Committee include: Co-Chairs : Buddy Luce and Rick Wilhelm Members : Stephen Apple Janet Murphy Bethann Scratchard Ex-Officio C. I . S.D staff Members : City of Southlake staff Attached is Resolution No. 93-42 establishing a Joint Utilization Agreement between the C. I .S .D. and the City of Southlake. S CT / C� q4 - I. RESOLUTION No. 93-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING AN AGREEMENT TO SHARE AND/OR JOINTLY UTILIZE FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, PARKS AND MAINTENANCE, AND TO ENTER INTO OTHER SPECIAL JOINT USE PROJECTS . WHEREAS, the City of Southlake ("City" ) and the Carroll Independent School District ("CISD" ) are mutually in the joint utilization, development, and maintenance of educational, recreational, and athletic facilities of and for the people of the City of Southlake; and the City and CISD desire to undertake the mutual effort to provide the maximum feasible public use of their respective facilities or assets in the accomplishment of this goal; and WHEREAS, the community and the community planners can benefit not only from the sharing of facilities but also from mutual cooperation in the planning, development, and implementation of these plans and vision; and WHEREAS, a successful joint utilization program must be based on an open and ongoing exchange of information and ideas, both parties agree to integrate a common system, site, facility, and program planning and implementation to achieve this result; and WHEREAS, both 'parties must generally benefit overall from each joint utilization; and WHEREAS, both parties will attempt to cooperate to provide the least possible expenditure of public funds in order to maximize the benefit for their taxpayers . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above, the City and the CISD do hereby undertake the following: 1 . The joint utilization or sharing of existing facilities, equipment, and park land for events, activities, or programs . 2 . The formation of a committee (s) to explore the possibility of implementing joint utilization agreements for, among other things, purchasing common supplies, maintenance of vehicles, support, and maintenance services for buildings, development, utilization, maintenance, and scheduling of recreational facilities . 3 . The possible funding of future research endeavors and sharing all input with each other so that the planners can utilize identical information in attempting to make the best and most efficient use of the existing and planned systems and programs. 4 . The maintenance of a committee (s) to explore short- and long-range strategic plans for emphasizing the proper planning, development, purchasing, and utilization of current and future systems, programs, amenities, and structures . IT IS FURTHER AGREED all actual decisions shall be approved by the City Council and the Board of Trustees or their respective designees upon proper authorization and approval . The City and the CISD agree to enter into an agreement or series of agreements providing a system for scheduling the use of facilities and/or equipment so that each party is treated fairly and equitably. The agreement or series of agreements will detail, among other things, specific rules of usage, maintenance, liability (personal and property) , reimbursement of costs or expenses [and other matters listed] . The party which originally constructed and maintained a respective property shall have priority of usage thereof, with the other party having second priority and other groups or agencies having third priority. Nothing in this agreement shall change or affect the duties, responsibilities, liabilities, or immunities provided under the Texas Tort Claims Act, Section 101 . 001, et seq. , of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code . EXECUTED this day of , 199 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT By: President, Board of Trustees ATTEST: Secretary, Board of Directors City of Southlake,Texas M E M O R A N D U M CITY ` NPGER May 13 , 1993 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 93-36, Appointments to Planning and Zoning Commission. The Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI concerns Planning and Zoning Commission. It states there are seven (7) members on the Commission, and they serve two (2) year terms. Currently there are three (3) expired terms on the board, that will need to be filled. The terms of Robert Dowdy, Dennis th, and Nick McGarity have expired. I wf•ote letters tcg-~t e members and ask em to respond if they would like to be considered for another term on the board. I have received letters from Nick McGarity and Dennis McGrath. Robert Dowdy felt he traveled to often and that it was not fair for him to fill a place on the board and not be able to commit to being there for the meetings. I have attached the applications I have on file for your review. If ou have questions, please get me know. /sl q6 - 1 • y= ' City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 93-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING ZONING COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Home Rule Charter of the City of Southlake, Texas, was approved by the voters in a duly called Charter Election held on April 4, 1987 ; and, WHEREAS, in the Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI concerns Planning and Zoning; and Section 11. 03 , allows for appointments for two (2) year terms on the commission; and, WHEREAS, currently the terms of three (3) commissioners have expired; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this Resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2 . The terms of Robert Dowdy, Dennis McGrath, and Nick McGarity have expired. Section 3 . The City Council hereby appoints the following persons to the Planning and Zoning Commission, to serve a term to expire in May, 1995: 1. 2 . 3 . Section 4 . This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MAY, 1993. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: GARY FICKES, MAYOR ATTEST: SANDRA L. LEGRAND CITY SECRETARY City of South lake, Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER May 13 , 1993 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 93-37 , Appointments to Board of Adjustment. The Board of Adjustments is a five (5) member board with (2) alternate members, to serve in the absence of the regular members. Currently the terms of three (3) members and one (1) alternate have expired. on February 16 , 1993 , a wrote a letter to those members whose terms will expire, asking them to respond if they wish to be considered for reappointment. I have received letters from Joe Be e , Karen Beynwlds, and fi1_liam Towler, asking to be consi Bred for reappointment. I have not received a response from Robert Downard. Attached for your review are the letters, as well as an application from Mr. James "Robert" Hudson, who would like to serve on the Board. If you have questions, or need further assistance, please give me a 141. / 1 U City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 93-37 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has a Board of Adjustments as stated in the City Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI , Section 11. 02 ; and, WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 , Section 44 , calls for a five (5) member board with two (2) alternate members; and, WHEREAS, currently the two year terms of three (3) members and one (1) alternate member have expired; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council does hereby incorporate said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2 . The terms of members, Karen Reynolds, Robert Downard, Joe Bentley, and alternate #2 , William Towler, have expired. Section 3 . Under this Resolution, the following persons are hereby appointed to the Board of Adjustments, for terms to expire in May, 1995: 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . Alternate #2 , Section 4 . This Resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MAY, 1993 . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: GARY FICKES, MAYOR ATTEST: SANDRA L. LEGRAND CITY SECRETARY City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM ``I Y ANAG R May 13 , 1993 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager PROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 93-38, Appointment to SEDC Each year appointments are made to the Southlake Economic Development Council. Under the Bylaws of SEDC the total number of trustees shall be nine (9) and shall consist of the following persons: 1- member of the City Council, appointed by Council. 3- citizens of Southlake to be appointed by Council. 1- member of the C.I.S.D. Staff appointed by the superintendent. 4- members of Southlake Chamber of Commerce (President, President-Elect, Immediate Past President, and 1 member of the Chamber appointed by Board of Directors. Members appointed by Council that are now serving include: David Bergman, David Baltimore, and Rick Wilhelm as , counci epresentative. A vacancy exists with the resignation of Betty Springer, last fall. I have contacted David Bergman and he does not wish to be reappointed. David Baltimore has asked to be reappointed by Council. I have attached the applications which I have on file for your review. If I can be of assistance, please contact me. /sl City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 93-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE APPOINTING THREE (3) PERSONS TO REPRESENT THE CITIZENS AND ONE (1) CITY COUNCIL MEMBER TO THE SOUTHLAKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, entered into an agreement with the Southlake Economic Development Council, which is a nonprofit corporation, established under the laws of the State of Texas for the purpose of promoting business in the City of Southlake, Texas; and, WHEREAS, part of the membership for the Southlake Economic Development Council is to be appointed by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is to select one (1) representative from City Council and three (3) members from the community, to serve on the commission; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The members who currently serve on the Economic Development Council include: David Bergman, David Baltimore, and one vacancy exists with the registration of Betty Springer. Section 2 . The City Council selected Rick Wilhelm to serve on the - SEDC, as a representative from the City Council. Section 3 . The City Council of the City of Southlake, hereby selects the following persons to represent the citizens of Southlake replacing the members noted in Section 1 of this Resolution: 1. 2 . 3 . and, , is hereby appointed to SEDC as the City Council Representative for the 1993 term. Section 4 . This Resolution shall become effective upon approval by the City Council . PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MAY, 1993. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: GARY FICKES, MAYOR / c City of Southlake,Texas Resolution No. 93-38 • Appointment to SEDC page two Attest: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Vci-3 City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 93-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE SOUTHLAKE PARK AND RECREATION BOARD; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Park and Recreation Board was created for the purpose of Planning and Developing Parks and Park sites within the City of Southlake, Texas, for the use and benefit of its citizens; and, WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Board shall consist of nine (9) members, to serve three (3) year staggered terms; and, WHEREAS, currently there is a need to fill an unexpired term, created with the regisnation of Carol Lee Hamilton. The term is to expire in January, 1995; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if copied i;n their entirety. Section 2 . The City Council hereby appoints , to the Board to fill the unexpired term of Carol Lee Hamilton, which will expire in January, 1995. Section 3 . The Resolution is to be effective on the day of approval of the Resolution by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MAY, 1993. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: GARY FICKES, MAYOR ATTEST: SANDRA L. LEGRAND CITY SECRETARY Gl� - y City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM C'� e Inmt " May 13 , 1993 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 93-40, Appointments to Teen Court Advisory Board. Municipal Court Judge Brad Bradley has requested the City Council appoint members to the Teen Court Advisory Board. The Board will provide oversight to the Teen Court Coordinator and serve as a conduit for input to the Teen Court from business and civic organizations and the general public. Resolution No. 93-40, Appointments to the Teen Court Advisory Committee, requires members be appointed for a one (1) year term. As shown in the resolution, Council is responsible for the appointment of a Councilmember to serve on the board as well as the appointment of two (2) citizens. Other members are appointed by the C. I . S.D. Currently, Jon Michael Franks serves as Council representatives and Sally Hall and Cathy Turner are the citizens appointed to the board. I have talked with both Sally Hall and Cathy Turner and they both wish to be reappointed to the board for another term. I have not discussed this appointment with Councilmember Franks. If you need additional information, please give me a call, and I will be happy to assist you. fs1 City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 93-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE TEEN COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TERM; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Teen Court is a volunteer program which allows juvenile misdemeanor offenders an alternative to the criminal justice system; and, WHEREAS, Teen Court allows juvenile offenders the opportunity to assume responsibility for their own actions by involvement in the judicial process and community service; and, WHEREAS, Teen Court brings juvenile offenders to a jury of their peers and to the community for constructive punishment which will provide the youths with an understanding of their judicial system and a realization of their rolls in their community; and, WHEREAS, Teen Court Advisory Board is comprised of nine (9) members; One (1) City Council Member; Two (2) Citizens appointed by the City Council; One (1) Member of the Carroll Independent School District Staff (CISD) and One (1) Member of the CISD Board of Trustees, to be appointed by the Superintendent of Schools of the Carroll Independent School District on an annual basis. Upon application to the Board, four (4) students of Carroll High School are selected by the Board; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All the above premises are found to be true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of the resolution as if copied in its entirety. Section 2 . The frequency of the meetings are incorporated into the BYLAWS for the Teen Court Advisory Committee, and there are no specific qualification requirements for the Board member, other than a commitment to the concept of the Teen Court. Section 3 . The members appointed by the City Council include one (1) City Council member and two (2) citizens at large. 1. 2 . 3 . Section 4 . The Resolution is to be effective on the day of approval of the Resolution by the City Council. City of Southlake,Texas Resolution No. 93-40 • Teen Court Advisory Board page two PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MAY, 1993. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: GARY FICKES, MAYOR ATTEST: SANDRA L. LEGRAND CITY SECRETARY City of South lake, Texas {{�� MEMORANDUM CST Agg,,9 AGER May 14 , 1993 TO : Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P . E. , Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Myers Meadow, Phase I, Developer' s Agreement Attached is the Developer' s Agreement for Myers Meadow, Phase I . This agreement contains the standard requirements for the provisions of water, sewer, streets and drainage . The standard maintenance bonds, inspection fees, park fees and perimeter street fees are included. There are a few conditions which are unique to this phase which resulted in revisions to our standard agreement . Below is a list of those conditions . A. L . : _ Developer' s Agreement is unique with regard to the Developer' s request concerning building permits issued prior to acceptance of the subdivision and the related requirements for performance bond, payment bond or Letter of Credit . Typically, the bonds are required prior to construction if . permits are allowed prior to acceptance of the subdivision and • the bonds are not required if no permits will be requested. • This Agreement is worded such that the City will not require these bonds unless permits are requested prior to acceptance, at which time the Developer will provide appropriate bonding to secure the remaining cost of construction. A line has been added to Section I .B . and Section I .C. has been modified to accommodate the options requested by the Developer. B . Related to the issuance of building permits as described above, the Developer requests that 15 lots be released instead of the usual 10- of the lots (9 lots in this case) . Section I .B . is currently worded with the 1096 release . C. a UTILITY/PAVING INSPECTION FEES - Staff and the Developer have negotiated revised wording for this entire section (I . , G. ) . Staff feels this wording is clearer . and more concise while covering all the required issues and staff intends to incorporate this wording in all future standard Developer' s Agreements . The standard agreement calls for, and staff recommends, that fees to be paid to the City prior to construction of each phase and be based on actual bid construction costs . (Pg. 3 , section G) The Developer requests that the following paragraph be inserted at the end of Section G, which defers the payment of the inspection fees until prior to acceptance of the subdivision. //e Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Myers Meadow, Phase I, Developer' s Agreement May 14 , 1993 Page 2 ;. s.:. ": ' :-:'.<:::'::.::.>> ;:;:>::>:f:::>:: ::>: '';..::°::f,.;.;;::':.::;:>:.<:<:°:: >" '.'. :<<< ., 4a. :�r3:s� .e �:�r3:.:<:>::,f'e.��:::<:::: :>:<:c�u<�:::>::: :.:z'�;c7.� ahe::.;::>:�'y:r�a,.�: City:>: a.ccekta: c *::::>:::Q:f::>:::::<thSubdz: x :on:>::<.;and>::;:are based...........:::... ................. cc s t >:_' n ......eg axe:>paid ».............. 11, Developer requests deletion of the comment requiring that no work will begin on any street prior to complying with the requirements contained in the Agreement . (Pg. 6, 3 . ) Staff Idoes not recommend deletion. EROSION CONTROL - Removal of soil build-up within the subdivision will be at the Developer' s expense . Not "Contractor" . (Pg. 7, E) Staff will incorporate this change into the standard Developer' s Agreement . 1F1 F SEWER PRO RATA - There is no Sewer Pro Rata Fee required for this phase of Myers Meadow subdivision. A Sewer Impact Fee will be required by Builder prior to a building permit being issued. (Pg. 10 , A) OFF-SITE DRAINAGE - The Developer understands that according /.- • to the Drainage Ordinance, developments are required to contribute on a pro rata basis towards the cost of replacing critical drainage structures downstream from the development . Phase I of Myers Meadow is within the basin served by the box culvert in Continental Boulevard. At this time the required contribution has not been determined. The Developer agrees to pay their share prior to the beginning of construction for Phase II . (Pg. 10 , B) I1 PARK FEES are required for Phase I (87 lots) . The Developer `N has requested a 50% credit toward the park land fees for the amenities to be installed. During the special Park Board meeting held on May 3 , the Park Board approved recommending that Council grant no more than 35% credit based on a formula they have derived. Attached you will find the park land application form and a memo from Janet Murphy describing the Park Board' s recommendation. The Developer requests that the following statement be 1. inserted in Section IV, C, which postpones the payment of the park fee until prior to final acceptance of the subdivision. (Pg. 10 , C) /111 Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Myers Meadow, Phase I, Developer' s Agreement May 14 , 1993 Page 3 I . PERIMETER STREET FEE - Approximately ` 819 . 62 feet of the development abuts on North Peytonville Avenue which requires the Developer to pay a Perimeter Street Fee of $17, 231 . 25 to the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 494 . (Pg. 11, D) Please place this on the Council' s May 18 agenda for their consideration and approval . If you have any questions, please contact me . BW lc Attachment : Developer' s Agreement Park Land Dedication Form Memo from Janet Murphy I c:\wpfiles\memos\myers.mem /D� -3 APPLICATION FOR PARKLAND DEDICATION 4/ .40/ ..) Type of Application : Preliminary Plat Final Plat (*If Final conforms to preliminary, fill in #1 only) 1 . Development Name : Fred Joyce - Mary Myers Enterprise, Inc . 2 . Phase I Total Acres 55 . 243 Total Lots 87 Phase Total Acres Total Lots 3 . Total Parkland Dedication Assessed* : $43 , 500 * Residential = $ 500 per Lot * Commercial = $ 500 per Acre 4 . Proposed allocation to fulfill parkland dedication requirement :. Land: $ Fees : yes Improvements* $ *Describe any improvements : 5 . Does this development propose private parkland/open space? Yes X No If Yes, please describe : Total Acres approximately 20 acres total will be provided for parkland/open space in Phases I, II and III of the Myers Meadow Subdivision. Proposed Recreational Facilities : pground, 2 tennis courts _(Phase II) practice fields (Phase I) , croquet court, logging trails and lake . 6 . If this development contains private parkland, open space or recreational facilities, are you requesting partial credit toward parkland dedication requirements? Yes X No 7 . Is this development a Planned Unit Development? Yes X No 8 . Please note any additional information you wish to supply the Park Board. Feel free to reference attached text or exhibits as necessary. The Developer is requesting a 5096 credit toward the parkland fees for the amenities that will be installed in Phase I, II and III . If the 5096 credit is approved, Park Fees of $21, 750 will be due the City for Phase I of the subdivision. The remaining Park Fees for subsequent phases will be payable as required. 9 . Contact Person: Fred Joyce Phone : 481-3516 Firm: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Ent Fax: 481-4593 Address : 1017 Wm. D. Tate Ave . Grapevine, Tx 76051-4099 110 c:\Wpfiles\memos\Myers.Prk /6a, - W.' To: Mayor and Council From: Janet Murphy, Parks and Recreation Board Chairperson Date: May 13, 1993 Re: Myer' s Meadow Developer's Agreement The Southlake Park and Recreation Board met on May 3, 1993 in special session. One of our agenda items was to consider the matter of the Myer' s Meadow Development park dedication fees . We developed a formula which we feel may be applied to all future developments as well as addtional phases of developments under construction that will allow the developers fair credit for the private recreational facilities they provide for their new residents as well as allow for a reasonable contribution to the public facilities called for in the Master Park Plan. The formula reads as follows : If the facilities are to be private, credit could be given only for "Neighborhood Park" facilities called for in the Master Park Plan for the zone the subdivision falls within. The percentage of credit applied to these private facilities will be based on the amount of acreage of the subdivisions in relation to the size of the Master Plan zone. Myer' s Meadow for example : Myer' s Meadow, a subdivision of approximately 140 acres falls within Zone 7 of the Southlake Master Park Plan which is approximately 2, 000 acres in size. Myer' s Meadow represents about 7% of Zone 7 . The developer could receive credit for 7% of the cost of facilities called 111 for in the Zone 7 Neighborhood Park. Phase I Master Park Plan Zone 7 Build-Out improvements : Myer' s Meadow: Type # Cost # Cost Playground _ 1 60, 000 • 1 60, 000 Multipurpose court 2 50, 000 Picnic tables & grills 20 34 , 000 5 6 , 800 Shelter 2 30, 000 Trail miles 1 45, 000 1 45 , 000 Ballfield Backstop 4 12, 000 Fitness Course 1 14 , 000 Tennis Courts 4 170, 000 Parking spaces 25 30, 000 Grass & irrig. (acres) 10 106 , 000 10 106 , 000 Restrooms 1 120,000 Contingencies 15% 100, 650 A & E 12% 92 , 598 Total 864 ,248 217 , 000 x . 07 15, 246 IWith 87 lots in Phase I, the developer owes $43,500 . Based on the above formula, we reccomend a $15, 246 credit which represents a 35% credit from what is due.4. /0 Gc.—.S" Printed on 5/12/93 at 5:01 PM by RAJ File name : F:\WINDOWS\PARKS\CREDIT.XLS City of Southlake - Parks and Recreation 1 11 otes from discussion and vote of Parks Baord May 3, 1993 E: Meyer's Meadow Developers Agreement PUBLIC Park Credit Calculation for PRIVATE Recreational Facilities Policy : Credit should be considered for Private Non-Public Neighborhood Recreational Facilties which are included in Southlakes Approved Park Master Plan. The recreational facilties included in Southlake approved Parks Master Plan and which are to be constructed by the developer as part of their required developers agreement will be mutiplied by the percent the development represents of the total park zone. The credit may not exceed 50% by ordinace. Meyer's Meadow Maximum Park Credit Calcualtion Residential Area in Meyer's Meadow 140 Acres Total Residential Area in Park Zone 7 2,000 Acres Percent of Total Residential Development = 7.00% of Park Zone 7 Note: The PRIVATE Facilites in Meyers's Medow can only relieve the recreational demand within the development. 111/ Southlake Parks, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan Neighborhood Parks Zone 7 Master Plan Build-Out Improvements Meyer's Meadow Type Number Cost Unit Cost Number Cost Playground 1 $60,000 $60,000 1 $60,000 Multipurpose Court 2 $50,000 $25,000 1 $25,000 Picnic Tables and Grills 20 $34,000 $1,700 $0 Shelter 2 $30,000 $15,000 $0 Multipurpose trail miles (level B) 1 $45,000 $45,000 1 $45,000 Ballfield backstop 4 $12,000 $3,000 $0 Fitness Course 1 $14,000 $14,000 $0 Tennis courts 4 $170,000 $42,500 4 $170,000 Parking Spaces 25 $30,000 $1,200 4 $4,800 Turfgrass and irrigation 10 $106,000 $10,600 $0 Restroom 1 $120,000 $120,000 $0 TOTALS $671,000 $304,800 7.00% Maximum possible credit for PRIVATE facilites within Meyer's Meadow $21,336 Attachments Southlake Parks, Recreation&Open Space Master Plan-Page 53 and Plate 3 Southlake Ordiance Article VII (Park and Dedication Requirements) MYERS MEADOW ADDITION, PHASE I 5-14-93 DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City, " and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer, " of the Myers Meadow Addition, Phase I, hereinafter referred to as the "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the 87 lots contained within the Myers Meadow Addition (Phase I) and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. I . GENERAL REQUIREMENTS : A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this agreement . B . Since the Developer is prepared to develop the Addition as rapidly as possible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residential building activity begin as quickly as possible and the City is desirous of having the Addition completed as rapidly as possible, the City agrees to release 100 of the lots after installation of ................................................................................................... the water and sewer mains . ,,,s. s. 111 :._t70 ` e P o a <`Pa"rnant Rand e e> <>of<``C ed'Et: toutheaCity4 Framing shall not commence until water quality is ap roved by the Cityci.ty_ammaisappottomuloomo ode:requirements::are:;::sa s: :xed;: The remainin build n ...................................................................................................................... perm ts "shall be released ' as soon as the streets are substantially complete . The Developer recognizes that Certificates of Occupancy for residential dwellings will not be issued until the supporting public works infrastructure within the Addition has been accepted by the City, and this will serve as an incentive to the Developer to see that all remaining items are completed so that final acceptance can be obtained. C. The Developer will preoent to the City either a cash cocrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or paymcnt bond acceptable to thc City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the. construction coot of all of thc facilities to be conotructcd by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of ouch amounto, up to thc total remaining amounto required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) 110 years of the oigning of thio agreement between the City and Developer. -7 �c:�:�: .::�a��>�::<gib::•::>;>::�h�::»��.... ............::.:::::.:::::::::::::.:..:.:: .:::::.:::.::::::::::::::::::::::::..........:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. : :>e ce .:�:..:n:.....:r:::...:h..................................:.:::::::::::::::::::::P::::::: des:�::>r:.: ::::»;:::...iii ;::a::.:::: »::.. ::::;:»::: :: ;s t r :.>.::f::., .>::>::.:::.:: <::: ...::..:: ::.:::ruo t;: on::::o f ;�;�e:.;:��.;::�b�;�:a:t�:<::bu:�;:1;c�:�:� :,>:.:��: ��:�::;��z�;:.;:�.� t���::�:.::::::.::::::.:::::::::::::::::::. :;ett e' �:ou6e:�;.;::a:�;;;;::ex�gx.�;�.gd.:::he:xe.�,.�z.,.;:.;;:�.pgkz:.:::x:.;:. ::.;:.;:::..:.:...::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::. ::::::::::. :; �d::::»: a:cceptable cst::<;Pted�t>:�<:>::>Po:�:f:orrnarye:E::::»B:bnd:<::e:��:::>::>P�>:>trternt>>flb�... .::::..................................... >IlaXzd a`.:I 'ee i'n > <to »:<<.:o »:::::::::the:;:•<:>::d t:e::::>:::::;of:::>::>::>t€he ::4::::�.::>`:::::.:::>:`:e��;i�ga:::<> e"`:4�'s€t< < »0�` d> I�3�€ti�ti€ir�,e ... payment::<;t:o>::::>t e;::iigU :;::>: : ::::pmp4:::ormQu::..: ...:::::.:....:.....:...:.... ..:......:............................. ......... AIL.. bonds should be approved by a test-rated Bondi g company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. • The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor (s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer' s obligations specified above . D. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 5 0 0 #r '<c�'g<�t �ffig<3 'nONOXz:<::>:NOWO the g avin These paving. maintenance-bonds:. letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. E . Until the performance and payment bonds, letter of credit or ash escrow rcquircd in C has been furnished ao required, no approval of work on or in the subdivision shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said subdivision by the Developer, save and except ao provided above . F. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the • City of Southlake and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof . It is further understood and agreed 2 • /D a S' that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities . Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire agreement shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. C . On all facilitieo included in thio agreement for which Developer awardo hio own conotruction contract, the Developer agreco to the following procedure : 1 . To pay to the City thrcc (3%) percent of the conotruction coot for inopcction fcco of the water, st_,_to , dram age r^ too, an 7-o t 1 f r= It io agreed by both the City and the Developer Hh ♦- �-he hi ty ll pa th, • • a —t -Develope dill be r�i-b1C to p all other tooting fcco required by the City not liotcd below: a) All nucl ar dcnoity te3to_ on the roadway oubgradc (95°6 Standard) . Trench tooting (9596 Standard) shall be paid by the Developer; b) All gradation teoto required to insure proper cement and/or lime otabilisation; c) Techniciano time for preparing concrete ,, ,a d) Concrete cylinder toots and concrete coring oamplco . Chargeo for retesting ao a rcoult of failed teoto will be paid by the Developer. Fcco arc payable prior to conotruction of each phase, ba3cd on actual bid conotruction cooto . The Developer will be reoponoible to pay for all inopection fcco when inopection io rcquircd on Saturday or Sunday. Thcoc fees arc conoidered over and above the 3% inopcction fee ao otated above . Acceptance of the project will not be given until all inopcction fcco arc paid. To dela —connection of build go -twoe oL Leo or water maino conotructed under thio contract until oaid water maino and ocrvice linco have been completed to the oati3faction of and accepted by • the City. ONUMENUMBOO :::M:.;:..::;::::::g:.;:;::::::::::::.:::::::::.:::p?:::.M:.;::the:»:< O.1,;OW.ng:,,: :.;;R�. n4.ec,t,z,anfeeWquM. U...;:oiree. er.aexz.t.;:::Wi:)::. :ogehe. cost::€<:'e 3 ;:.::::...::":.�.::i:ii?.::�':':.:.':r:::i.:.:........:: v:::':i:•::i::'..��`:ii:::."::::::::':::::: :��:: .::�'::::�::: .ii�.: .� ::ii:i:::.ii:"'...i:i i:.i: ::iiii:c�'�':LL this:::::>::a. g.grogntato mbxch::::>DeveI e:r>:::>awa: ds:::.......: :::: m. :.::::.:.::.::.;:.;5i:.ii ' " �.:: :.." ..:::.;:.>:.::::<.;;;:.::;.;;:.>;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:�;:;_:.;>:.;:.;:.;:;. c n.srru > 'aii O iL a t i k '_» ;««`Fz`Niel' e ...>:.>:.3:>::> g:�' t rd' :::;. . . :�:, ....... .. ............ ....................... ......... ..... • nsp .et.x�zns and................. .........:...:... .:................:............: ...................................................... .. ....................... ............ ....... ............ ...................... ::.;:.;:.>:.;:.:.:;.;:.;:::....::::::. <: - `.:; ,,,,.:,.,;.:a:':'» " ;:.;::.>:.>:..<.,,.:::' :'::.:::.;::::.; o.::...the::.>>r dwa• ::>::sub.. .r. ..:de ...................................................... i'':`:ed > to>;<::i s'>:<`<;>"' »`:.,<,,<:,.:>:>:«'er b:<>::>::>::><::>A :::>:::: :rada > >t>e s:::>::>re:. u.�r. . ....... . ....... n ur.e....... .xc. .. . : ............................................................................................................... ........ c:: >::>::::«:::«:: hn'� ::::::b: ..... o .... rams c0ncr. .te:::::< :..:: :z: d >�:: ....:::::�:._::is�::::::::.�::::::. ....:::::K.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i iiiiii:J::4:::•iiii:•ii:viii:^isviii?i}iiiiiiiiiyiii}}}iiiiii:::.......... ::... .. axe+ • d: >::::<:»>::>:::>Coz crete::>:>:::> y> >inde=:::::::::>:>:t�: �t:: :>::::an ::::<::<::>co4' get::.::::<:::::>::>::cpr':::: : samples<=: l i e s>=::>or::::>::::prat:er::::::>::.: ::.:::n:.;:;:::> :::::: >:::::; .<: ::> :>u n<' ';::..::>> ;<::::•�:••�: : > '`viii:t.i'iiiiii:.;:........::::::i::.'a 'i:i.s f'�•:.'i.:.':';i.::.'i ::;:;:j;:i .i:;:;:; iiiiiiiiii::^ii""":•:::x:: '.:'.::i::::::.::•i::i::i::i::iiii•:iiiiiii':•iiiii:'•iiiiiiiiiiii'•i::ni:ii? com>.�etcl...... .o.....t.he'......sat.�.s�a.c.�.�.c��....:.c�f... H. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses, hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties . After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs . Cuch amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer or Builder has notice of coots . should::;:s:xc .;>::cos:ti;>:re: ta: n:<:u : a:id:>:::for=1.2 }.>:<da;.>s:::;aif;t:...i:.:>::»'::o::i>::::.i:..::i>:: .......�.:::�...:t.:::::man:::...:�..�.�:.:.�::::3...�..�r�:::r��:::su��;';.: .ro at✓`i:''�o>::�ta>z: t:a:� �c�:>> I . Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc . ) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument . Approval by 4 �� —/Z the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. J. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer' s Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company' s authorization to do business in Texas . Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II . FACILITIES : A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition to the City of Southlake. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer' s engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer' s request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes . B . DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer' s engineers, approved by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council . The developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS : 1 . The street construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217 . Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the 5 Developer' s engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2 . The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and one year operation of street lights; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances : c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by the Director of Public Works . 3 . All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this agreement . All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities . It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has ................................................ commenced. The Developer has agreed laNggER&MMO to advise the City Director of PubII' c Cn7orks as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES : The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition to the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer' s engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. 6 E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer • agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc . , to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer' s responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When, in the opinion of the Director of Public Works, there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy- two -(72) hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas . If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and placed the soil within the subdivision at the contractor' s Developer's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. F. AMENITIES : It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities . The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc. , for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands . 7 H. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place : 1 . pr-e p t the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2 . At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Approved for Construction" by the City Engineer. 3 . All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4 . Developer' s Agreement executed. 5 . The Developer or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance prior to commencement of any work. III . GENERAL PROVISIONS : A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend. the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents , servants or employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities . B . Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas . C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute 8 /d ' /`� or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications . Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City' s approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer' s designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature . • In addition, the Developer, or Contractor Shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in thc name of thc City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance . F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof . In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security 9 /e s- • provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer' s expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time . IV. OTHER ISSUES : A. OFF-SITE AND/OR SEWER PRO RATA: Myers Meadow, Phase I , will be served by the S-4 sewer line . Therefore, no Sewer Pro Rata Fee is required for this phase, however, Sewer Impact Fees will be required by the Builder and payable prior to building permit being issued. B. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE : Developer understands that the Drainage Ordinance, Section 6 . 06-B, requires that each development contribute on a pro rata basis towards the cost of replacing critical drainage structures downstream from the development . This development is within the basin served by the box culvert in Continental Boulevard. At this time the actual cost of participation has not been determined, but the Developer agrees to pay their share prior to the beginning of construction for Phase II . C. PARK FEES : ......::::.::::..... Ordilia ; >No 483» > S bft n o js A l >` 1'I `>oai o ; > ::::? ' ` s`` >: o €>< ':< too `' > .,>:::: .::> u<< :: ''': €» `:'':<,<> `' :::> >'>'> <: >:'' >::` '`<°>< �.:o. ...:.:::.:r:::::>::>::>::::;x:n::»::;::>::;.:ons i de:rat::; :.:<::;::>::;::o::<>::>: t:.. :.wev�...::r:::::::........:.�::::�...:�...::...:...:..:ra:�:x..:.:n.::::::::.:�.::. �he:.;::>::::>amp:�:a:�::x:e:s::::»:<::: O:::::>:<::<�e *figEgIlgainhXgfigggOTANUNEaM lagaRe e :...:...:::::... ..:::b :g A44g xc ..F > :h :.:OWdabpex.;:. .as :::. s u�l>t.<z n >;.::..e::>::>o:.:>::::>. .::.:::>:;>:::::<. >:;:>::::>:A.,.;;<.:;:.>:::. .::::>::. ::: �:::::x'e .. .�.. . . ....f.e. .....<.��..... .2.�.. .7�.fl............�.�....t.�e.... a.'(j>:::<4:<>>».0:::>:::=s 1c.: • .a ::>::;:.;;C3c e ILK � the Bard as reved reeQmmer� az•I• t t :: ; ::;::»:Cou :e::..:> ::»:.::; >::>: <.:;:>:. _ ;:.:..:::;::»;:.::. ::::>;>:;. :::-::>::>::: ;:.:.:>:<::»»::.;..:;::::>::>:>.t< e:::::>::Gx:.::Y.;:.;:..:::::.::: .::.:: ',.:..:.:.;:. a ,:.;: a::::rnor... .::::: R5-L ::: :5.:Q:::::: r...e. . ,.t.:::: OI7M: . resulting.:.;>:.;::g :>::;:..:...::::: $Ogg r.....ba d::; s .,:>:OIEffiu .a c inp : E credit.....f.©r-....a....r.e u .t.�n .....re uua.;: .d.... ark.... ee:::<::o: :::::>::: <:>:<:::::>:<:::>::>::>::»:::«::::: :< :<: :: '..:;:.;..;: .la.a.::: :.;;:.;,:: .;:.;:.;:,: gyAg.e.:::::::: :r. :c .::::otti :the:::.::::b.e:.:z i a..n..:::: . ..:............................................... • ................................................... ... .............................................. .................................................... D. PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE : The Developer agrees to pay the Perimeter Street Fee of $50 , 000/mile, in accordance with Section IV, Paragraph B, sub-paragraph 2 of Ordinance No . 494 . Approximately 10 1, 819 . 62 feet of the development abuts North Peytonville Avenue which would require a Perimeter Street Fee of $17, 231 . 25 . SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title : Date : CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date : 11 /d t —i? REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1 . The Letter of Credit (L of C) must have a duration of at least one year. 2 . The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10, 000 . 00 . The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit . 3 . The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake . The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit . 4 . The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years . 5 . The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met . Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements . 6 . Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7 . The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8 . The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9 . Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. c:\wpfiles\devagree\myers.I 12 /d t - /8 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CI1 °I‘CER 11180*11114 May 13 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Turnaround on Dartmouth Drive Phil Jobe has contacted the Department on several occasions concerning a turnaround on Dartmouth Drive in Stone Lakes Phase III . Mr. Jobe has spoken with Fire Services Director Williams numerous times as to alternatives for a fire access turnaround. After examining the alternatives given to Mr. Jobe he has requested to visit with the Council in that he feels none of the alternatives are compatible with his design. There are several factors that Director Williams and the Department of Public Safety wish for Council to take into consideration: 1. Whatever turnaround is approved will probably be temporary in that it is my understanding Dartmouth Drive will be expanded at some future time. 2 . Dartmouth Drive is approximately 360 feet in length with a slight curve. 3 . Bent Trail Circle in Timarron, Potomac Place in Monticello and others in the Arvida addition are temporary turnarounds that we have required in the past. I have atached for your information a memorandum from Director Williams, preliminary plat of Stone Lakes and fire access turnaround alternatives . I am available for any questions or comments that you might have. BC/mr Attachments (3) wp\Memo\Dartmoth.2 !0/(/'-1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 11, 1993 TO: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety FROM: Jerry Williams, Director, Fire Services SUBJECT: Fire Access Turnaround on Dartmouth Drive in Stone Lakes Phase III The Uniform Fire Code, 10-204-D, states that for any dead end fire access road (which includes public streets) in excess of 150 ' in length, a turnaround of sufficient size must be provided. Dartmouth Drive is approximately 360 ' in length and is on a slight curve which makes backing large fire apparatus difficult. Several options have been proposed which would satisfy the Fire Code requirements.. One option would be to place the entire turnaround on Lot 79 . Another option would be to place the turnaround on both Lot 79 and Lot 40 and to use it as the driveway entrances for the two lots . This can be adjusted to fit the two lots as long as it is within 150 ' of the end of the street. We had this same situation occur on the east end of Chapel Downs Drive and a turnaround was moved and adjusted to fit the lots in question. Other streets where temporary turnarounds were required and have since been removed, or will be removed because of street extension, are Bent Trail Circle in the Timarron addition and Potomac Place in the Monticello addition. Others were installed in the Arvida addition and have since been removed when the street was extended. I am available for any questions or comments that you might have. JW/mr wp\Memo\Dartmoth.Dry R p , APPROVED P ELIMI Y PLAT STONE' LAKE. P SE THREE,\ �` \ REA[AINIIYG PORTION OF i 60,97,§ ACAS SOUTHLAKE' PROPERTIES„JOINT VENTURE \•ti -VOL.- ti 10132, PG. 0.232, D.R.T.C.T. ,\0p'\ / ?i h•h / 0 � 2 / 1 EXIS 1,ING AND PROPOSED • �ti ,• �A Qi00 FLOODPLAIN �' '" . g5.2936'•W✓' •A3 • ' 73 Oc` N05'17'09"W '{ _ •� o� , % \ss 0194 / 50.00' ' O h 0-, p �t.A,y 4\\ \a41 639.4.F. 4 % O O OZ / -^2 ✓O \✓S•\6'.20 C i p�rj I //<1' -I .'. \�o\a' �+ '1� \b \y j D.E 4'2.05' 2' 6•-�� SST✓- MIN F.F. \ C �. 95.09' �26 6?'41 ' ?✓ . 638 0 \ \ 0 g 1`� soo'2o •"� 26' ;o y:,, v \ \ V' EN,S64.3-'0••E I ~ 55-2)-k 122 35. ••48 50-f �1' ,,.Q1 /S a'.•4. 0 0 �v I r / 6 aa S 5 '1) /.f Oa tu; Q' / / m 0.`.,• Oo //// � i� 79 / s— 75 // /� a 1" MIN F.F. pc, �� .� a D R. 1 632.5 a to 78 n. MIN F F / `.`L .'�. -� �- U E Z Z IN. c I W �p E36.0 / .,2- M / / CD 0•• B.L. 634 5 J .;o r CV 87 35 � MIN F.F .•r SSo ✓.✓O✓ 7 / Q Ili 635 0 A2" c J J.X 1 i J ; CP 3^• Cg,• F., \ / A. o • 157.. 4•S 1/ 09' l J O t . . 9s. ,3.� 76 /i 4 i. Z t 30, 1q ✓�,r \ 7j / 1v3p t .d is.te, \ ° . o, _ S 1� m v /29C1 J 1 ,96..v✓ \ 6 / 6 cv c„ 0,1 . 40 hz P �, �� oQ "I • �,° 32 ., ¢ Z m ¢ i row ,0 ( /✓ y?). n 39 m t ©y / / / f.S.0� 6 o r\-- F D _ 800 27 56'E ti6 ati•'I z ©°° _.- 6ti o a // a �� ' / ' : L 51/, a a o 5Q e • / o-"o 153 OS' / / '. Y C-, ''F, 41 / z / p 0' Z'' fin+ S05'48"18'w / nj° Wa �0 29 ' . w M^ mD n "� 37 N15 1 / j ,n m F 129 6 59"E 3g. S54 '22' 14"E , \/ „. 5.46 Q • 70,56' y _ —_ -- 139 20' , aq ' E�en S00'32'17-F- t to % 0 vvN u 1 v ot t —z7 o7N 51 - i4 o 36 No4'01'43 H • 137 56 a • 142 78' • ,--1Q co m 503'43 47'E to 2 �•1 r ►—r �; s \ \ w /D —3 LUNIMUN AROUND A FIRE G£ CtJ�DE-SAG HYDRANT 100� c 20' 30R 20' TYP ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO I20' HAMMERHEAD —^20' 60 M • -• - �30R TYe 60' 6d 2.0s 20� 30s s` R- c 30 R� / � TYP. c� T Y P 20' ----70�• —.- 20' ACCEPTABLE 120 ALTERNATIVE TC HAMMERHEAD 120 HAMMERHE FIRE LANE MARKING • 20' _ 20 NO PARKING .FIRE LANE NO.PARKING 2 � 4" ; .�._ • ONINIJVVd ON SNt!1 21:11d .. 'ONDlb1Vd ON /6'//)."`q poly City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM CITY sNAGER May 14 , 1993 TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E . , Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Street and Drainage Improvements on North Carroll Avenue, from Dove Road to Burney Lane On Wednesday, May 12 , 1993 , bids were opened and read aloud for reconstruction of Carroll Avenue, from Dove Road to Burney Lane . The low base bid was submitted by Sunmount Corporation in the amount of $200 , 913 . 75 (bid tab attached) . This bid amount includes the cost of drainage improvements, which was not included in the Street Construction Committee' s Task Force estimate of $125, 000 . The base bid called for a 22 ft . wide roadway, no shoulder and necessary drainage improvements . This was the recommendation from the Task Force . The alternative bid specs included a 24 ft . roadway, 4 ft . stabilized shoulders, and ditches and culverts designed to contain the 100-year flood. Staff feels that proper drainage of a street is a key factor in maintaining a street and therefore recommends that the drainage facilities and the ditches be constructed along with the street paving of Carroll Avenue . Since South Peytonville is to be constructed by the County Assistance Program, this will result in additional bond ($1 . 5M Street Bond - account 703/999 . 15) funds available for the Carroll Avenue project . Attached is the City Engineer' s letter recommending that the base bid for the reconstruction of Carroll Avenue, from Dove Road to Burney Lane, be awarded to Sunmount Corporation in the amount of $200 , 913 . 75 . The alternative bids are not recommended. Staff concurs with the Engineer' s recommendation. Please place this item on the Council' s May 18 agenda for their consideration and approval . If you have any questions, please contact me . B c Attachments : Bid tabulation sheet City Engineer' s recommendation letter c:\wpfiles\memos\carroll.I CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES May 13, 1993 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Award of Bids for Street Reconstruction - Carroll Ave. (Dove Rd. to Burney Ln.) City of Southlake Job No. 001-213 Dear Mr. Whitehead: Enclosed herewith is the bid tabulation for the subject project. The project was bid on May 12, 1993. As shown, the low bidder was Sunmount Crporation with a bid of $200,913.75. The Street Construction Committee of the Citizen's Task Force estimated the cost to be $125,000. This did not however take into account drainage improvements. The cost breakdown for the project is as follows: COST BREAK DOWN Street Paving $ 89,608.75 Ditches 57,065.00 Drainage Pipes/Culverts 54,240.00 TOTAL $ 200,913.75 We recommend that the drainage facilities and ditches be constructed. The lack of proper drainage has added to the deterioration of the street. Since the Peytonville project will be constructed with assistance from the county, this will result in a considerable amount of bond funds to be available for the Carroll Ave. project. Therefore we recommend that the contract be awarded to Sunmount Corporation in the amount of $200,913.75. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. \carroll.aob Enclosure ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1170 Corporate Drive West • Suite 207 • Arlington, Texas 76006 817/633-1023 • Metro 640-4329 /n .s_ I• N. CARROLL AVENUE - STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (DOVE RD. TO BURNEY LN.) - JOB NO. 001-213 `�_ SHEET 1 OF 2 CHEATHAM &ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION _ mo- OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE:May12,1993 SUNMOUNT CORP. J.L.F BERTRAM_ �NST' TE�i?{AINC. ` 1 , r, APAC, ?Pi'EYNOLDS ASPHALTP.O.BOX 1770 1007 HARRISON AVE. ) '•.O.BOX 1807 f P.O.BOX 370 JOB TITLE: N.CARROLL AVE.-STREET&DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS /,. ROANOKE,TX 76262 :, ARLINGTON,TX 76011 .WORTH,TX 76101 EULESS,TX 76039 (DOVE RD.TO BURNEY LN.) /} PHONE:817/648-2741 Ilf�mi PHONE:817/261-2991 HONE:817/336-0521 PHONE:817/267-3131 FAX:817/648-2203 �II FAX:817/261-3044 1 AX:817/877-4908 AX:817/267-1878 }JOB NO.: 001-213 �• T.BID: $200,913.741 AMT.BID: $201,831.45 !•MT.BID: $236,281 r:-AMT.BID: S281,334.50 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT C•ST UNIT COST UNIT COS 1 IT COST NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE _ ~ BASE BID-TYPE 1C&2C CONSTRUCTION _ _ _ _ 1 STREET EXCAVATION INCL.DITCHES _C.Y. _ 5050 11.30 _ $57,065.00 _ 7.20 $36,360.00 _ 10.40 $52,520.00 14.00 S70,700.00 2 SAW CUT FOR REMOVAL OF ASPHALT _L.F. 70Q,_ 2.20 _ $1,540.00 2.10 $1,470.00 3.00 _ S2,100.00 3.20 $2,240.00 3 8"THICK COMP.CEMENT STAB.SUBGRADE S.Y. , 10000 c 1.50 _ S15,000.00 1.57 $15,700.00 2.00 _ $20,000.00 3.70 S37,000.00 4 CEMENT FOR SUBGRADE STAB. TON _ 200 56.00 _ $11,200.00 56.65 $11,330.00 70.00 $14,000.00 70.00 S14,000.00 5 2"THICK COMP.TYPED HMAC SURFACE - S.Y. 9285 3.75 _ $34,818.75 5.21 r $48,374.85 3.90 S36,211.50 3.70 S34,354.50 6 5'THICK 3,000 PSI CONCRETE S.F. 5000 _ 3.20 _ $16,000.00 _ 3.04 $15,200.00 5.00 $25,000.00 5.20 S26,000.00 7 STRIPPING-CL, MEDIAN&SHOULDERS L.S. 1 3500.00 - $3,500.00 3330.00 $3,330.00~_ 3700.00 $3,700.00 4500.00 S4,500.00 N 8 6"THICK COMP.CL B CRUSH STONE _L.S. 1 1700.00 $1,700.00 _ 150.00 $150.00 1500.00 S1,500.00 2000.00 S2,000.00 9 6^THICK COMP.TYPE D HMAC FOR DRVWAYS S.Y. 450 _ 13.00 S5,850.00 15.23 _ $6,853.50_ 17.00 _ $7,650.00 20.00 59,000.00 10 6"THICK 3000 PSI CONCRETE RIP-RAP _C.Y. 50 _ 190.00 $9,500.00 y 210.00 $10,500.00 260.00 $13,000.00 300.00 S15,000.00 11 TEX-DOT TYPE B HEADWALL L.S. 1 2500.00 _ S2,500.00 - 4425.00_ $4,425.00 4300.00 S4,300.00 6000.00 S6,000.00 12 10X2 PRECAST BOX CULVERT L.F. 70 _ 200.00 $14,000.00 _ 195.00 S13,650.00 - 260.00 S18,200.00 280.00 S19,600.00 13 24"DIA.CL III RCP INC.EXCAV. _L.F. 610 44.00_ $26,840.00 54.21 $33,068.10 - 60.00 _ $36,600.00 59.00 S35,990.00 14 30"DIA.CL III RCP INC.EXCAV. L.F. 20 70.00 $1,400.00 y 71.00 _ $1,420.00 - 75.00 S1,500.00 250.00 S5,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BASE BID _ $200,913.75 _ _ $201,831.45 _ _ S236,281.50 S281,384.50 (ITEMS 1-14) - _ _ _ _ _ 1.. _ i.. -- _ -- _ _ N. CARROLL AVENUE - STREET& DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (DOVE RD. TO BURNEY LN.) - JOB NO. 001-213 CHEATHAM &ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION SHEET 2 OF 2 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE BID DATE:May 12,1993 SUNMOUNT CORP. J.L.BERTRAM CONST. APAC,TEXAS,INC. REYNOLDS ASPHALT P.O.BOX 1770 1007 HARRISON AVE, P.O.BOX 1807 P.O.BOX 370 JOB TITLE: N.CARROLL AVE.-STREET&DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE,TX 76262 ARLINGTON,DC 76011 FT.WORTH,TX 76101 EULESS,DC 76039 (DOVE RD.TO BURNEY LN.) PHONE:817/648-2741 PHONE:817/261-2991 PHONE:817/336-0521 PHONE:817/267-3131 FAX:817/648-2203 FAX:817/261-3044 FAX:817/877-4908 FAX:817/267-1878 JOB NO.: 001-213 AMT.BID: S296,175.80 AMT.BID: S291,980.71 AMT.BID: S329,584.15 AMT.BID: $417,672.00 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST UNIT COST NO. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE ALTERNATE BID-TYPE 3C&4C CONSTRUCTION - -1- --r I- I 1 STREET EXCAVATION INCL.DITCHES C.Y. 6050.1- 11.00 S66,550.00 6.32 _ $38,236.00 _ 10.30 _ S62,315.00 11.05 S66.852.50 2 SAW CUT FOR REMOVAL OF ASPHALT L.F. 700_ 2.20 $1,540.00 _ 2.10 $1,470.00 _ 3.00 S2,100.00 3.20 S2,240.00 3 8"TH --4ICK COMP.CEMENT STAB.SUBGRADE S.Y. 10715 1.50 - $16,072.50 1.57 _ S16,822.55 _ 2.00 J 3. S21,430.00 3.00 S32,145.00 4 CEMENT FOR SUBGRADE STAB. TON �14.3 56.00 - S12,000.80 56.65 _ S12,140.10 70.00 ' S15,001.00 I 70.00 SI5,001.00 5 2"THICK COME'. TYPED HMACSURFACE S.Y. 9999- 3.75 S37,496.25 r 4.27 $42,695.73 ^ 3.50 _ S34,996.50 3.50 S34,996.50 6 2^THICK COMP.TYPE A HMAC SURFACE S.Y. 9999 3.75f S37,496.25 - 4.27 _ $42,695.73 _ 3.35_ S33,496.65 I 3.00 S29,997.00 \ 7 5'THICK 3,000 PSI CONCRETE S.F. 4700 - 3.20 - S15,040.00 r 3.04 _ S14,288.00 5.00 _ $23,500.00 5.20 S24,440.00 8 STRIPPING-CL,MEDIAN&SHOULDERS L.S. 1 _ 3500.00 $3,500.00 r 3330.00 $3,330.00 _^ 3700.00 _ S3,700.00 I 4500.00 $4,500.00 (a 9 6"THICK COMP.CL B CRUSH STONE L.S. 1 _ 1700.00� $1,700.00 150.00 _ S150.00 1500.00 S1,500.00 2000.00 S2,000.00 1 10 6"THICK COMP.TYPED HMAC FOR DRVWAYS _S.Y. 420 _ 13.00' $5,460.00 15.23 $6,396,60 17.00 $7,140.00 20.00 $8,400.00 ssk 11 6"THICK 3000 PSI CONCRETE RIP-RAP C.Y. _ 50 220.00� $11,000.00 J 300.00 _ S15,000.00 260.00 S13,000.00 I 300.00 S15,000.00 12 TEX-DOT TYPE B HEAD WALL L.S. _ 1 _ 2500.00 $2,500.00 2970.00_ S2,970.00 _ 4300.00 r S4,300.00 6000.00 S6,000.00 13 10X2 PRECAST BOX CULVERT L.F. 70 200.00~ S14,000.00 231.50 _ S16,205.00 _ 260.00 S18,200.00 280.00 S19,600.00 14 24"DIA.CL III RCP INC.EXCAV. L.F. _ 50 46.00T $2,300.00 54.75 _ $2,737.50 60.00 _ S3,000.00 150.00 S7.500.00 15 30"DIA.CL III RCP INC.EXCAV. • L.F. 20 _- 70.00_ S1,400.00 68.40 $1,368.00 ~ 75.00 S1,500.00 210.00 S4,200.00 16 18"DIA.CL III RCP INC.EXCAV. _L.F. 20 _ 41.00_ S820.00 48.40 $968.00 _^ 54.00 S1,080.00 140.00 S2,800.00 17 6 X 2 PRECAST BOX CULVERT L.F. 200 170.00 S34,000.00 168.40 $33,680.00 190.00 r $38,000.00 350.00 S70,000.00 18 6 X 3 PRECAST BOX CULVERT L.F. 50 • 180.00' $9,000.00 r 195.80 _ $9,790.00 220.00 S11,000.00 380.00 S19,000.00 19 5 X 2 PRECAST BOX CULVERT L.F. ._ 100 130.00 T S13,000.00 154.75 $15,475.00 _ 170.00 r S17,000.00 250.00 S25,000.00 0.00 20 4 X 2 PRECAST BOX CULVERT _L.F. 15 13 _ $1,950.00 196.00_� S2,940.00 220.00 S3,300.00 450.00 S6,750.00 21 3 X 2 PRECAST BOX CULVERT L.F. _ 85 _ 110.00_ $9,350.00 _ 148.50 $12,622.50 _ 165.00 _ S14,025.00 250.00 S21.250.00 r TOTAL AMOUNT ALTERNATE BID _ - S296,175.80 _ - S291,980.71 S329,584.15 S4I7,672.00 (ITEMS 1-21) - • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 12 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: 1993 Land Use Plan Update Staff has previously forwarded to you and the Council the white notebook containing the research data for the 1993 Land Use Plan (L.U. P. ) update. We have also previously forwarded the Land Use Map (draft dated 4/1/93) as recommended by the Commission. We will be discussing the map portion of the update at the Council meeting on 5/18/93 . The Commission is currently reviewing the text portion and I feel they will be forwarding it •very soon. Staff will have available overhead transparencies of all maps within all planning districts for discussion purposes . At the Council' s direction, we can discuss each district or selected areas of interest . Please place this on the Council agenda for their consideration. • GL/gj • • • • C:\CD\GREG\MEMO\LUP.MEM l0 0'.1