The URL can be used to link to this page

1993-03-02 CC PACKET City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 26, 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting, March 2, 1993 1 . Agenda Items No. 5A-5C are consent items that have been discussed previously with City Council . 2 . Agenda Item No. 7A. Ordinance No. 480-81, 2nd Reading, rezoning of DalDen property. Note from the 2/25/93 review letter (pg. 7A-11) that applicant has met all requirements of previous reviews . 3 . Agenda Item No. 7B. Ordinance No. 480-83 , 2nd Reading, rezoning request located west of N. White Chapel, north of Sam Bass Ridge Rd. There have been no changes since first reading. 4 . Agenda Item No. 8A. Resolution No. 93-06 (ZA 92-70) Specific Use Permit for equestrian uses . (Showtime Farms . ) The exhibits are the same as previously submitted. We have been told that applicant has met with all of the surrounding property owners . No property owner has withdrawn opposition, so a 3/4 vote (6 affirmative votes) will still be required for approval of SUP. 5 . Agenda Item No. 8B (ZA 92-71) is the Plat Showing for Showtime Farms . Note the informational comments on the 1/14/93 review summary (pg. 8B-4) , particularly as it relates to 10 acre minimum and street, drainage, and park dedication requirements . Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest February 26, 1993 Page 2 6 . Agenda Item No. 8C. Ordinance No. 581, 1st Reading, is a routine ordinance to confirm and adopt the official boundaries . Due to the many different annexations carried out by Southlake over the years, from time-to-time we have difficulty locating the metes and bounds descriptions of several small tracts . This creates problems with the Tarrant Appraisal District, and makes it difficult to "prove" the tract was annexed. The ordinance before you for consideration is a legal formality that will clean up any questions about whether or not a particular tract is included in the City of Southlake . 7 . Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution approving members to the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Committee . There are four (4) persons left to appoint if the Council wishes to have the same number of appointees as before. By statute, the advisory committee must have not less than five , (5) members . 8 . Agenda Item No. 10A. Monticello Phase II Developer' s Agreement . Note from the cover memo for this item that no performance bond, etc . is required of the developer. This is in keeping with the direction of City Council on the Monticello Phase I Developer' s Agreement . Note also that the developer has requested 50 o toward the park dedication fees, as was granted by City Council in the Phase I agreement . The Park and Recreation Board would like to seethe developer pay the full fee . Should City Council want to require full credit, the language on Section IV. C. (p. 7) of the agreement needs to be changed. 9 . Agenda Item No. 10B. Austin Oaks Connection to SH114 . The City of Grapevine has requested the City of Southlake to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest February 26, 1993 Page 3 • approve the extension of Austin Oaks Drive to SH114 . Jerry Hodge, Director of Public Works for the City of Grapevine, will make a presentation to the City Council Tuesday night. Note from the last exhibit (pg. 10b-6) in your packet that the proposed extension will be several hundred feet to the west of the current temporary access road, which is not depicted. 10 . Agenda Item No. 11A - 11D are for discussion only. Items 11A and 11B have material in your packet . Agenda Item No. 11C is being prepared by our City Engineer, Eddie Cheatham. He will have handouts available Tuesday night . Agenda Item 11D (attached to my memo) was faxed to us late. We have added the item to the agenda to provide you background information. There is at least one Southlake resident who wishes to participate in the program. Other Items of Interest 11 . Included in your packet is the bound printed copy of the FY1992-93 Annual Budget . Also included is a copy of the City' s position paper regarding S .B . 348 . Today at noon we met with representatives of D/FW to discuss the bill and our position. Mayor Fickes, Mayor Pro-Tem Wilhelm, Wayne Olson, Allen Taylor, me, and Jeff Fagan, D/FW Director of Planning, and Gary Keane, General Counsel for D/FW, were in the meeting. We will give you an overview on the meeting Tuesday night . Also, Mayor Fickes, Former Mayor Latta, Bob Mundlin, Chamber President, Allen Taylor and I will be in Austin Monday for the Committee hearing. The Mayor and I will report on the trip during our reports items on the Agenda. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest February 26, 1993 Page 4 12 . Attached, FYI, is a copy of the projections made by Carter and Burgess in connection with their work for the City of Fort Worth Water Department' s Capital Improvements Plan. 13 . Note the attached report from Talem, Inc . , on the samples taken of the water from the Continental Park Estates lake. We took the samples as a result of complaints from a CPE resident concerning pollution of the lake. 14 . Note the attached letter from Billy Campbell, DPS, concerning the appointment of our first P.S.O. 15 . Attached hereto is a memo and worksheet concerning accomplishments 'and, events in the City since our Home Rule Charter was approved._ We will appreciate it if you can think of anything to add. CEH/k • / 4 w: • • * • 4.,* ��`�Ta: .v TARRANT COUNTY Date: 02 - as- y,3 S:35 A 47. Time: Comccny Ncme: �� e No. of Pcges: (Exclud ng Cover Sheet) C etas or instructions: _At taae-61,40,„ 10,4441. sx4s- 4/44441, ditatt,41( f?U4J4 . From: C7/ Scv142t Department: • 4.4ey Telephone No.: itei7 3 31-9' 9 Tarronr County • Administration Building 100 E Weatherford Street Fax No : 817-884-1702 Fart Worth.Texas 76196 E8 - 2 S�9 3 T HU 17 : S 3 0 P _ 02 • The Tarrant County Housing Rehabilitation program operates in about 30 different cities. It is therefore necessary that the program adopt a single set of procedures so that the program can operate smoothly. As part of the Tarrant County c_using Rehabilitation program, under the Community Development Block Grant, each city must adopt the attached resolution allowing the county to operate within that city. This resolu— tion states that the city waives any building permit fee on any home to be rehabilitated, and further, that the city accepts the bonding/licensing of the approved electrical and plumbing contractor(s) as long as they hold • a valid license within Tarrant County. We still require the contractor.to obtain the permits and display them as required by city ordinance. • The resolution also states that the city will conduct the electrical, plumbing, and mechanical inspections on any home rehabilitated through this program according to normal city procedures. Tarrant County will then mail a copy of the original work write—up and contract to the city's building inspection department so the city will have a record of the homes being rehabilitated and which contractor has contracted for the work. We ask the city's consideration and adoption of this resolution so that we might continue to operate the Housing Rehabilitation program throughout the cities of Tarrant County. lc? E E — 2 5L" 9 S T 1-1 kJ 7 : 5 -el 0 P - @ 3 RESOLUTION NO. • CATION IN T RFJNT COUNTY ]ii.i.":E.iNG REHABILITATION P::O: i.AM :tiiiEREAS, the City of participates in the Tarrant County Community Development Block Grant Program; . and , .:Iir:REAS, the City of shares in a c,v,:'e:-.ative agreement with Tarrant County for the purpose of re- Community Development Block Grant funds to aid low and moderate income families; and, :HEREAS, the City of has been chosen to receive a grant to repair eligible low and moderate income, owner-occupied homes; 3O1ti, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of hereby agrees to allow the Tarrant County Housing Rehabilitation Program to operate within the City; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of agrees to waive all building permit fees, bonding and licensing requirements, provided that each approved contractor holds a valid bond and license from any other city in' Tarrant County in accordance with State bonding and licensing requirements for electri- cal and plumbing work to be performed under this program; . and further, that it shall be the responsibility of the Tarrant County Housing Rehabilitation Program to assure that such bonding and licensing re- quirements are satisified by contractors working under the program, and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of agrees to perform the necessary electrical, plumbing, and mechanical • inspections for said program,. • • Pprroved and adopted on this day of , 19 . City of • By: Mayor 0, igNilpg, _ y� BurgessFEB 1� 1 19q Cimi. Carter 3 OFFICE OF It.0 j !v%uryAGEll�y . February 10, 1993 CT Mr. Curtis Hawk C' City of Southlake S 4._,(y 667 N. Carroll Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk: We are pleased to have a 100 percent response to our surveys on water/wastewater from each wholesale customer of the Fort Worth Water Department. The data you provided will be used to assist us in preparing the Land Use Assumptions Report for 1993 and in assessing the Capital Improvements Plan. We are including a series of charts entitled: • Summary: Population Forecast - 1992 through 2013 • Residential Population Forecasts • Employment Forecasts Both of the latter forms have shaded columns marked "COG Forecast 1990," "COG Estimate 1992," "COG Forecast 2000," and "COG 2010." The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) prepared a population forecast in 1986/87 which was used in the 1990 Land Use Assumptions report. It is shown in the shaded columns for each wholesale customer for comparison purposes. The column marked "U.S. Census" is the actual population count for each wholesale customer recorded by the 1990 U.S.Census of Population. Those columns of population forecasts that are shown next to the NCTCOG Forecasts are those population estimates prepared by each wholesale customer and shown on the survey form returned to the Fort Worth Water Department in early January, 1993. You will note that Carter &Burgess,Inc.,has prepared population estimates for those wholesale customers who did not respond to the future population estimates requested on the survey form. The Carter & Burgess prepared estimates are indicated by an asterisk(*). Please review the population estimates. Should you have a question related to the Carter & Burgess prepared estimates, don't hesitate to call John H. Mason, AICP/ASLA at 735-6227, to resolve your questions. If we do not hear from your City by February 19, 1993, we will assume that you agree with the'population estimates as shown and they will be used as the basis for further impact fee calculations. Again,thank you for your prompt and thorough reply to the survey request. Your cooperation greatly expedites the ordinance preparation. Sincerely, t • ' ' & B 'GESS, INC. r J c i • H. Mason,ASLA, AICP S- • or Vice President JHM/lb Enclosures 92138701.L5 cc: Correspondence Mr. Dale Fissler, P.E. , SUMMARY: POPULATION FORE - 1992 THROUGH 2013 i RESIDENTIAL EMPLOYMENT Wholesale Customer Dec 31 1992 2003 2013 Dec 31 1992 2003 2013 BENBROOK 19,766 31,300 45,060 3,000 6,290 9,000 BETHESDA (3) 675 6,750 _ 13,500 0 0 0 BLUEMOUND 2,300 2,350 2,350 75 100 100 BURLESON 16,164 19,060 21,330 , 5,450 8,860 11,360 CROWLEY 7,000 8,740 10,654 *1,780 *1,952 *2,690 DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS 1,920 2,700 3,500 500 600 800 D/FW AIRPORT 0 0 0 , 53,000 67,000 82,000 EDGECLIFF VILLAGE 2,750 3,000 3,300 600 700 750 EVERMAN . 6,000 *6,500 *6,700 500 *550 *600 FOREST HILL 11,282 11,400 11,600 1,100 1,200 1,400 FORT WORTH (1) **476,696 **521,650 **561,995 **324,442 **392,700 *4'460,707 HALTOM CITY 32,800 33,128 33,459 *11,560 *14,650 *19,200 HASLET 825 1,875 4,261 , 200 1,000 3,272 HURST - _33,765 35,980 38,533 19,568 22,860 24,456 KELLER 14,700 23,300 35,000 *1,905 *5,075 *8,550 KENNEDALE 4,200 5,500 8,000 *1,360 *1,805 *1,995 LAKE WORTH 4,606 5,061 5,574 3,000 3,300 3,630 N. RICHLAND HILLS 47,646 57,120 674. ,800 _ 11,700 _ 16,430 21,160 PANTEGO 2,371 2,500 2,600 *1,000 *1,150 '1,200 RICHLAND HILLS 9,754 9,888 10,554 5,595 6,977 _ 8,412 RIVER OAKS 7,000 7,000 7,000 *1;200 *1,350 4'1,450 SAGINAW 8,600 9,030 9,482 3,426 4,615 6,150 SANSOM PARK 4,000 4,000 4,000 *745 *794 *890 SOUTHLAKE 7,983 17,900 26,000 *1,650 *4,359 *7,225 T.C. MUD #1 4,500 6,500 9,000 160 300 500 TRA GRAND PRAIRIE (2) 9,090 9,090 9,090 0 0 0 TROPHY CLUB 4,515 8,202 12,211 *207 *413 *704 WESTOVER HILLS *565 *568 *580 0 *94 *130 WESTWORTH VILLAGE 2,350 2,500 2,500 *280 *405 *585 WHITE SETTLEMENT 15,240 15,800 16,430 3,700 4,020 - 4,590 - - TOTALS 759,063 868,392 982,063 457,703 569,549 683,506 'Forecast Assistance by Consultant " Includes ETJ/Forecast by Consultant (1)Includes ETJ in water/waste service area (2)Population based 1 million gallon per day contract with FWWD,110 gallon per day per capita consumption • (3)Population based on 250,000 per day contract equal to 225 meters x 3.0 persons per meter SC\92138701.CH1 PAGE 1 RESIDENTIAL POPUL K FORECASTS >:>COG< «'< U S. :::COG > Customer :;: :COG:::<> Custome r :: :::;:::;COG::;::;::;€: Customer .::.;:F orecasf:>::: Census `Esffmate`< Est. <: ::Forecasf> Est. >><:Forecast:«`: Est._ WholesaleCustomer C sto r 0......... 1990 <>;:1992 < >< 1992 0001>`: >> 2003 >;>:>:2010>5: 2013 BENBROOK 00 NB K 644::> 19,564 : € ; <19? 2.. 19,766 >>26'692: 31,300 301 3i 45,060 BETHESDA ES A (2) 6,750 <: 13 500 B EMU L U O ND 2,133 » ><.. 3 2,300 >> :>>..2 40. 2,350 >> <> 135:> 2,350 2, B RL U ES N O 1 1 1 1 1 21,330 20 60 6 13 >> 6 3 <> 6 64 `:> »» >:22;. 70s 19 060 :> >€:23 R C OWLEY 1�> >6 >: 11~ 7 '>::::<:`:7 896: 0 654 ,925' 6,974 >< 7,0 7,000 >< <<::7376'; 8, 40 ,. - , DALW RTHI GARDENS O N T N G O G S ;> 4:>: 4 4:: 6 1,758 1,920 �>:<:2 7 2 2 7 3,500 D/FW AIRPORT EDGE CLIFF VILLAG E GE <2 i� 2 1 :::>::2 3,300 :. ,831.:. ,7 5 -> ....`: _'2;69.8' 2,750 >931:: 3,000 :>;: 3,003�, EVERMAN ...... 5,672 >>>::;< 5,666`:�: 6,000 6;573 < *6,500 ::;;`<::><>::: 6, 6 : , *6,700 FOREST HILL 1:> < i'727» 11,48211483;> 11,282 >: :<:; <:12158 11,400 ><>::;:>1 616:: 1 600 FORT WORTH 4� 447,619 **4 . '"* 4:' ** 1 5 ..,,..77,108 :> >;449791� 76,696 >:>:>526;575' S21,650 >«€; s563,09. . 56 ,99 HALTOM CITY : •32680:; 32,856 : <:32811>> 32,800 >'> 33,847' 33,128 ;. :34,418' 33,459 HASLET -- -- - 825 `.:::< . -- 1,875 . ...- .-• 4,261 • HURST `< 37;941.;- 33,574 »' : :33,765 33,765 `'37,991.: 35,980 ;:: :37,852 38,533 KELLER <:: 1, 2::: ;14 4 4 2 72:: 35,000 ><:. :I ,40 13,683 ::> ;;. 1..,973<: 1 ,700 <<<< 21, 25.: 2 ,300 :;: : :<`;27,6 KENNED ALE 191 : 4,096 »< 4153`; 4,200 `: 676> 5,500 <:> >:::5 055` 8,000 LAKE WORTH >4888 4,591 ..>s::>4,602 4,606 5,195 5,061 5,664 5,574 N. RICHLAND HIL LS >:;:; ;<.>:<'49,043; 45,895 :< : .._47,646`: 47,646 <<;:: . . ,207 5 , 20 67 800 PANTEGO < >2,843> 2,371 -> `.:. `365' 2,371 ->'"` 2 800::. 2,500 ": .. ':< 2 797:: 2,600 RICHLAND HILLS ,75 :: 7 978 ,14 'r 9 754 >> > >10 54::::: 10 544 <:;»::::�:><>::..9,.. :4. , ,..::<.::::>::.:.�,.. �.. >:>::.<:>:9,888 ;. 9,888 ::.;:.: ...... ,5 , RIV ER OA KS SAGINAW :1:11,266! 8,551 8 602- 8,600 •:: . ><:14 406` 9,030 s 16 853.. 9,482 SANSOM PARK ; .4;015:: 3,928 ;:'<:3917 4,000 <::;;>3,959.: 4,000 4,040: 4,000 SOUTHLAKE :>:>::::9,100':. 7,065 :<':;7,983'; 7,983 : ;::18,618; 17,900 :_>:::1--:22,883: 26,000 T -- C. M D U #1 36 4:<...3 500 `> 5 516c 153: 9,000 TRA GRAND PRAIRIE (1) 2': 4<<:<<8$4 2 _..... ... 8,8 *9,090 '< . <`,8,842 *9,090 TROPHY CLUB 4 340 : 3,922 >;>3,991.. 4,515 ;: -:4,448:. 8,202 :.-. <> <.4 12,211 T --- WES OVER HILL S 63 *565580 %577;" WESTWORTH VILLAGE '« 3 250:< 2,350 -.`- <':< 2 332'. 2,350 < :3 306> 2,500 `, < :>:3 14:: 2,500 WHITE E ::..:::..... _ , .: .. - ..._ -- - - -- - - -- --SETTLEMENT >:>_::15'239.: 15,472 :><. ';<':<:15 90': 15,240 7 <:r 15 >-,:'>'.16 4 . 16,430 TOTALS 764,141 706,942 714,236 759,038 . 863,044 867,392 936,023 982,053 •Forecast Assistance by Consultant • '•Includes ETJ/Forecast by Consultant (1)Population based on 1 million gallon per day contract with FWWD a 110 gallon per day per capita consumption (2)Population based on 250,000 per day contract equal to 225 meters x 3.0 persons per meter IISC\92138701.CH5 PAGE 1 • EMPLOYMEP 1RECASTS a :::::::::COG.::::::::::::: Customer COG.::::::::::: Customer ::::COG.:::.;::::: Customer :: Forecast;`::;:;::. Est. >'<`Forecast[ Est. ;:Forecast:::;::;: Est. Wholesale Customer ::;:: 1990': 1992 ; 2000'::> _` 2003 z':`2010 »:> 2013 i d BENBROOK _ :: >:3,322. 3,000 :>:. .: .>:.5,525`. 6,290 ` < :.7,770 : 9,000 BETHE SDA DA 0 0 0 BLUEMOUND ::;'<330 75 >' >:::>:::>380:> 100 ::::: >> •.405'• 100 BURLESON :< ::4783:; < 11:::> ><:1 :: . , .. . . 5,540 >'...<>::..81 8,860 ;>>. . ..;. 0,613' 11,360 CROWLEY * * .762:<: 1780 <: '`':<1 1 52 <': 4> 2 690 DALWORTHINGTON O NGTON GARDENS � ::>: :'. .2 .::..:....:.:::::9. 6 500 '::::>': ':.:. 1, 25., 600 <:<<:> :::'2;820'• 800 D/FW AIRPORT :` << :<<25'799.:: 67,000 `>:><:>: .... 82,000 ,86 ., 53,000 ,>< ::..:. � 29338>> EDGECLIFF LIFF G VILLAG E GE ........... 50. 700 :;.803::i 5 EVERMAN <<731 ; 500 ``:: ` ::>.7 550 i` '«::>::'7 4:> 600 FOREST HILL ,789>< 1,100 •:<...<< >2128::> 1,200 . >`°:.2, 71.: 1,400 FORT WORTH :':332,836i< **324,442 : ':e:..400;245::: **392,700 ` :>_ '47T582,` "460,707 HALTOM CITY _..,..`::<>_11,495: *11,560 ::•:14,74.-. *14,650 ;:519,731:'. *19,200 HASLET -. 200 3,272 - - .1,000 HURST :;< 19,076:: 19,568 : <• : 22,825 s 22,860 <: ..:. :::23,968:;: 24,456 KELLER ' <:1,3 1,905 >: . <'<>i2476»: 5,075 > :. ...:.. ,407: 8,550 KENNEDALE . : :1358 *1,360 :: :1,792 *1,805 <:::.1,887.' *1,995 LAKE WORTH '>1636: 3,000 >:: : >:::>.::2,558:` 3,300 ::: :::<:<3,070.0 3,630 N. RICHLAND HILLS ,....< <:11,695': 11,700 >: :~::~.16,052'. 16,430 ;: - .;. 21,160' 21,160 PANTEGO <1,649: *1000 ;:><%:2345': *1150 's 494: *1250 RICHLAND HILLS <::•.' 5595': «>: :::::: 6.9.77< ': ,412`' , 5,595 , 6,9778, 8,412 RIVER OAKS '286 *1200 :1i<1319° *1350 ::-:<1:340 *1450 SAGINAW 3#158 *3,426 .. ::: ":' 4,153••: *4,615 :•5,689 *6,150 SANSOM PARK '::::•749 *745 • 796- *794 >;<;::899 *890 SOUTHLAKE '1;673 , *1,650 ''`..': `::4,528:: *4,359 < 6;536i: *7,225 T.C. MUD #1 633.: 160 >'<:1255: 300 .:: 1;735` 500 TRA GRAND PRAIRIE . . .. . . - 0 0: 0 :: '0 0 TROPHY CLUB :.;;;:.;:.;:.;:.;:. ::>::1 :: 2 :::::'.224:: 4 99. 07 <>> . 13 >'<0263:> 704 WESTOVER HILLS * *L30 WESTWORTH VILLAGE .. ?' '•267.':' *280 >::.494'• *405 :712`: *585 WHITE SETTLEMENT ::I.3 696 3,700 <<.4,024:: 4,020 ::` .. : >4 586': 4 590 , , TOTALS 434,227 457,793 533,288 569,549 642,715 683,556 •Forecast by Consultant •'Includes ETJ/Forecast by Consultant MISC\92138701.CH4 PAGE 1 TAEM, INC. { • - Environmental Services February 23, 1993 • Mr. Ernest Brown City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake. TX 76092 Dear Mr. Brown: On January 29, 1993, several samples were delivered to TALEM, Inc. for analysis. The sample descriptions are identified below; TALEM ID: • 265 01/29/93 1 Identification: Upstream TALEM ID: 265 01/29/93 2 Identification: Pond, Dam These two samples were analyzed for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) , Dissolved - Oxygen, Fecal Coliform, Herbicides, an ICAP metals screen, Total Suspended Solids, and pH. The results were officially reported on February 19, 1993. ' In reviewing the data for these two samples, I can find little that is Out of the ordinary from what one would expect from surface water in this area. The BOD, pH and Dissolved oxygen for both samples are well within normally observed trends for surface water. The herbicides were tested and were not found to be present in either sample. The Fecal Coliformnwas rather high in the sample identified as Upstream. I believe that the Corps of Engineers uses an upper limit of 200 cfu/100 ml_ to determine whether lake water is suitable for human recreational .activities. The Pond, Dam sample had significant levels of mold which prevented accurate growth and determination of the fecal coliform level in this sample. The level of solids in, both samples appears to be quite good for surface waters. The ICAP-Screen (performed by analyzing the sample after acid digestion using an inductively coupled argon plasma) yields approximate concentration values. Both samples show the levels of sodium, calcium, and magnesium which one would expect in surface .waters . There are not arty other metals present in levels which I believe would cause alarm although the levels may be higher than acceptable in drinking. water. In conclusion, the two samples identified above appear to be typical surface waters based on the testing performed by our laboratory. Tr T can provide further information, please do not hesitai-9 m. Sincerely, jam..,,, . James G. Tarter, PhD • Director of Laboratory Services $17/$vitae Fax:817/335-O89O Metro 817/854-0443 City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER February 25, 1993 di-A5-Q 6 ) " 1 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Public Safety Officer • The City of Southlake's first Public Safety Officer, David Law, will assume his Public Safety Officer duties on March 2, 1993. Officer Law is State certified, both as a police officer and firefighter. His shifting patterns will consist of four —twelve hour shifts, with four days off, consistent with the police. schedule. He will spend a minimum of one of his twelve hour shifts in a fire uniform, regulated strictly to a fire shift for education, training and serving as a regular firefighter. He has been issued his bunker gear which he will retain in his vehicle during those shifting patterns that regulate him to police officer status . This will enable him to respond directly from the field to a fire scene, increasing the potential for the Department to place as many as five full time firefighters on a scene, with a more realistic figure of a continuous four full time firefighters on a scene during those shifts when he is functioning as a police officer responding to a fire call. , This is an exciting endeavor for the City of Southlake and the potential for such a Public Safety Officer will be recognized as the year progresses . (6/"‹ BC/mr wp\Memo\DLaw.PSO • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 25 , 1993 TO: All Departments FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance Chris Terry, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APRIL 1993 SOUTHLAKE NEWSLETTER A special edition of the Southlake Newsletter is planned for April . Your assistance is needed to assemble information. The City Manager would like to incorporate all the major accomplishments and events that the City has experienced since the Home Rule Charter election passed in April 1987 . Attached is a worksheet that you may use to assist us in compiling this information. Please use whatever resources that you may have to complete this as it pertains to your department . These worksheets must be returned no later than March 12 to ' either Chris or Lou Ann. If you have any questions, call Lou Ann at extension 716, and Chris at 705 . Thanks for your help. Chris Ter y Lou Ann Heath F CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE HOME RULE CHARTER ELECTION WORKSHEET January 1987 February TRA Regional Wastewater Treatment—Big Bear Creek agreement$134 Million • March April Home Rule Charter election May June July August September October November December January 1988 February March r CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE HOME RULE CHARTER ELECTION WORKSHEET April 1988 TRA Denton Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment agreement$6.5 Million May June July August September City Manager Curtis Hawk hired. October Public Safety Director Billy Campbell hired. November December January 1989 February March April First Southwest Financial Advisory Contract Agreement May - :;June July CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE HOME RULE CHARTER ELECTION WORKSHEET August 1989 Weaver&Tidwell 5 year audit contract September October November December January 1990 Perimeter Street Ordinance approved. February $1.25 Million TRA Bonds issued for S-6 sewer line. March $3,076,137 GO Bond Refunding issue. Colleyville interim Big Bear Creek agreement. April May June Award of bid for S-6 Sewer line. July Continental Park Estates sewer line bids approved. August Environmental Task Force. Water and Wastewater Impact Fees Adopted. $200K CO issued for personal property(City Hall) September $1.1 Million CO issued for FM1709 water line improvements. - October Water rates increased %. November CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE HOME RULE CHARTER ELECTION • WORKSHEET December 1990 End Colleyville interim Big Bear Creek agreement. January 1991 Telephone system installed with auto—attendant. February March April May First Southlake Newsletter published. Recycling began with BFI. June Friends of the Southlake Library donate$5,000 for books. • July Toyoma Japan visitors. Community Roads Improvements Task Force Formed. • August Adventure Camp for Kids at Bicentennial Park. Issue$200K CO for land purchase 7 acres at park. September October NETS,Teen Court started. TNB bank building moved$19,250. November Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting received for fiscal year end September 30,1990 December Thoroughfare Plan adopted. Park Master Plan adopted. January 1992 February Southlake Historical Society holds first meeting. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE HOME RULE CHARTER ELECTION WORKSHEET March 1992 April May $4.5 million Street bonds election approved. $1.3 million CO issued for FM1709 water line,curb,gutter,drainage. June N.Peytonville from FM1709 to Raven Bend constructed$100,000.(County) July Project Redirectory(Telephone directory recycling) Post Oak Trail,Cypress Creek,S.Peytonville street/drainage by Carroll$151,000. Timarron August Parks/Library Sales Tax Task Force formed. September Bond rating trip to New York. FM1709 ground breaking ceremony. October $1.5 million GO issued for N.Carroll Avenue improvements. $1.3 million CO issued for water plane improvements. November New Water bill format introduced. Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting received for fiscal year end September 30,1991 December Teen Court coordinator hired. January 1993 Christmas Tree recycling. February Crossroads Square and Post Office open. March April May �t;, 1 ' }� j> i +• • • ; :c•. 'j'r:� + i• l :k.,4. Jr.r,. ft, I, ' "II ` --L,/tr7i,,,lfl!I•:0i,!.:• ;�'`l'Alif,r c44i'•'.lI Z.tlU:.' 1,::4 tlr •P' : 'ii ' ,; {I 'II •� v �`�y •7 .• II t ._ • i, ;, .1:i,, . : 41t,;.• :S 1di;''‘i.Pll tt4i1P•.;''.11 , „ ,f ' Ir,.•- !?S . It '9L ee ,d lnI '- s s - (•-- `$r''t ,,i I,, '. : I t. ?••b.:,s.r ( r,,. I', : r.•, .\ 'S ,, �=e == e oa��.'4., .cr..ii%,d;i,V' � 1 r?1 1'. . vk ti. ,�:i:••' ♦ ',,.Y' , �,`� r ` •/ •i.: .k, 1),aI 11! , .:o,", , ;r�;111 .' " ;.1.•.. . l `ip.. .../-S ' `_ / • Q A. 'i1' 0f y-re ^� 1'i,?iAI... . ''.a ^:• If e • S5° ray _ ;;I'j', •I<< 1.�11. • ;`,T, it 01..4 :'., f ; ly�q.�, i `U oC 76a, D RAIIN• I (I fit 1 11g.,1C3 E.1Ceo ri � I //- (/L `�� `� .;f;!):�''1',,,i 1 1i,.r I+G�;. — o n Q.1 Vu 1:17 ^,1,574 o o(ii0 wa %Y,i `'�'' ',� ___ ,( '-,` � ...,,,., y`j'� • f�r1 Il 1- ,'T 1• cry •1 J l / ,. ,_� _ ,, IF' 01,...., • 11 oQ`r OO CIL+YI 1�,�_� curb i. l J /,r ,:_ :1 1_ ` .�- �_._ -�1 P:aC?''�,C.T SITS._ ! T•- _ . - `'. \" I l r/�/- .p...a- ____�zc p,ec J�'1• , � ' y _` I LZT�1,.. • ,i P,. .`,i:�.h _ Rp .: ' .) -'s �._ , .• •.-a : ;ors -1. :5 ': , 1/1 In�aI 1 ,, ..C'p1 w . IYr' .{ , i',.t',' 1'. \'.\I '�C y '`,'.';(` -,' ya 'y Ae"�N, "*0"1 �J ;.r..e I ..�'1tf'• .'i r i.,?.•�Jf I. f i Wflik „I, )' • -•''' • ,• •.• i J ! 1� 5 I • ''''' r,'• 11'1**{�� --- ".,', ,i ,t ';'',it ,- •,''r • 1 ° ''•ekjKiE>�+1.(1,:; 'II /\...)o .� 10' Iqt,'. ,• '`.a {",• ')]cf� 44,4 aP'l'�'`n;;\, • I I .aurti t r, :.,Si;+, ' ' ' e Uy ,� v le i. I�t t' t, ,i, a', f R�"I r,Ji,.:;1'.! i :,i `, �II '. �` 60 �� p-11 � ' �,".��,n y�� . eS°;, y� i. .1•1 ,� '•t,,,,,,,,.--6...-7G, E. rr' L._ / - h / l'A''' P, i' `` �.f MA„ ,:o..i.•-, .fi0•• . �... \ •3 .i` �� -- 1 �� ,11 rtr a,,o y • ,,,,,...71-A „,;,417.:...,_._:::, .... jig '� - 9 • — \ �•• rr C __ n o f 4 ••\'. `1 'i,,; . g . \\\ 600 •// lI •`. l YI ` .a. t'_� ''� It ,, \ D) „ n IL_ II If O �� ny .A� :.iXi`,. ..1. ;'.t ,, )II _ 1 II \n.\n \ ' \y` �-� /T�'/ ' fir. ., ,\. \ - I`�.. /i0�•--_,�/mil ,NORMAL POOL ELEV .• .--...--/ ) i \s.. '""/".'-.11%as"; 1-- - . 41S .• ' n .1.:',,,,,,'• •'., - •: '`•.','''"?",•'' .'•• •'. /n a •,,I;,' ."•\, 'i',:r' ,•,,. ";‘, F-,. .,..,.:;.;,. . /\ ' ,\ _ if. ! t... . • l'\•••.„ ,. ,3\ 1 ..„, • ',!. • ' '-:' •-•.. /'/.. '• --,..-i•",' i•-•,‘ •. . \I '1.--- /1.1-7-1 'I' ' j ' /..--.., --N \''' ' . .1 -1 . `\ - •r, I .rf' _ % " r�"' t.' II i -... .'1 ...,'",-,,IC it ' fi.itfl 11 at, \ ! '. t 1.../ • "" . ..)! ' C3 ) 11 . . N\.\li...\. . \S, .I tr'N: . ,. 1 ‘....•, . \ .......••I•1' ' .• • : . 0 ("'"7, i ••:.).1' 4, 1.,/ -1Kii, 6 \ .", A . I (r=c0?,,N 15'--7-j,: P '•6A "' \'"\*•'. N" i'l ,•, . fel• .,21 i l \ ..1.., , (141t4"). . i".,,...r,.. ,-,.., ,,,•\14-,% .j.. I n < 1.. , ,),, /7, „f77,.:. .1\.7t 71. \. . 1 \ . , f,. ,., 7,\ .„\:\ ..,,„ .'", q. r•. ---...\---.-.„.....„..--)5 ,. u';,11 6-Ro T{ f(3 I ;I '•9i �� h��1� cc I� 6 l ,I/. .W�0� .�`` _ 0 \ %,', � , ,..J-- i, ,!•n •'Q( .�,�rs3J, 1)'-;: 1•`' -'° Il f• •'. t1, • �\•)'r 4.. •,'i: , fir.'-i 5 • , jot,(L/`/ C `• a© Y lb i.. l_ 1 ( O• ' • '!, 6 I 'es),- c Uove.4 � •(e bCli • • 6 8 �g nt ° �,f 'Ip rlg• I `•f ii y' �Ir' • �..,,ti, 0 • 'i1" ,r. _ . �/ ,�., •:6,t ,, ., . • .., ..... 90• :1' en non .r. ,:„. --.•ec% • 1. o 1 \ y oy ^'1•i" c •if',, I�'' '''% :i• • I, , ':' I, IL::, /A, 1::. \'te /%-� tAO. ' , Y • I,1 n.,idia''. : 89 .j�j .-9,/ ,!i •/i•);.o.; ., �d, cl :;',�II ^.tL �., T ,' ,' am 4.. .': 5� '' itvn is r • oi.. on r0, 1111 ( .eiere .o e.f�'.� ,, ' :.1' dnr.-.�11✓:on-' v • t_' v1 NI. . N i''''r ''''c)"' . '. ' • "4X.923. ••'''' * * .• • 7 I �,,!1,'• +', O. 66.•Ir s 1I l �q ,}- "1 r' 1 �JJ/ 1• / '11,�: 'r' li •.(: '1 , n y. . i' ees1 J� ) ' ,h' O°' ,`;`pi t,, 1'• Q � �p,{1 )9 . . ..• 1 ,.\;,..`;•`;// 7� , ( T�;( , ',-a.=1'. 1 ', / / ! /n'1 • a, 1, i•�1 rCD iir - 77 11 _UNIT L!NLr'Jr I L!NLLt-1.7 I C.=.NJ . • ,4 OvT"C�ivt /N C 1t r• 7,7C�v` • /- j - - .ivy- 745 F/vc�r` .�/'�4/A14.'r� /1C�S: ) Z_//>!�'/7OR.!" 4 -NST?/ / A cAE- O/� . CR. Er,9az_i• axe a,�Q/ •9 1 "1-7` /.5 e/1//7i=.-/ d fie,/,47 .� / , VS d . � / /�/gTl/R�1��/��.1 j�,. C �r r '-•'C L`c-[ (�pposAcc • //usaivi.--, The- 4 , G ,G L. GL/ c.71/ �-1..1<_,)C4 s/4 L 4,14 fr( vot ,S -/f &JI137 °13 tke, S 1a-. /&N-93 firr % ; _ . ;5. /U2) ACrt u r I y ,4-77: •ac 7}}F E'.AL ...is, 47c) 6 . A.! f- � !i L-4'U��E�/ c G.74-7-3 A-e,QM4//./ `^"tl .1 c f izz o/Q G._:dan -di / 'a am; DA?, A-A-4) �r (��.?�!�,. C ti 5/SST GJ?1 �.iC�v�y�/� � /Y S r/. S &'/ c.;^- �=i7Z ri H ),j s t6RTttE Cokics.F05, S rim�Tm•b tt • i , Amend SB 348 as follows: 1. On page 2 , line 20 , after the word "operated. " add the following: The joint board may also exercise the power to realign, alter, acquire, abandon, or close portions of roads, streets , boulevards, avenues, and alleyways, without a showingPof paramount importance, provided that the portions to be realigned, altered, acquired, abandoned, or closed fall within the geographic boundaries of the airport. Any taking of said right-of-ways will be pompensated at fair market value. . 2. On page 3 , line 1, after the word "ordinance" add the following: • purporting to regulate the 'use or development of ; property • 3 . On page 3, line 2 , after the word "applicable" strike the word "to" and insert the following: • within the geographic boundaries of 4 . On page 3 , line 2 , after the word "airport" add a " " and strike the following: • air navigation facility, or airport hazard area. • • • Page 1 e • Committee Amendment By Amend SB 348 as follows: on page 3 , after line 6, add the following subsection: (c-1) A joint board, that consists of populous home-rule municipalities, shall not acquire property within a municipality, for the purpose of enlarging an existing airport operated by a joint board, in more than an aggregate of ten percent of the land area of that municipality which lies within the geographic boundaries of the airport, without the consent of that municipality into which the airport is being expanded. City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER February 25, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Permission to Advertise for Bids for Water Line Improvements in White Chapel Blvd. and Bob Jones Road. On February 16, 1993 the City Council approved the developer's agreement for Oakwood Estates which included a contribution of $45,000 towards the above mentioned water line improvements, $35,000 with Phase I and $10,000 with Phase II . The analysis of the need for water improvements in this area resulted in the staff recommendation that major water line improvements are needed all along White Chapel from Dove Road north to Bob Jones Road as well . These improvements include upgrading the line in White Chapel to a 12" line and installing a new 8" line in Bob Jones road. This project will be funded by the $1 .3M bond issuance ( 757/999 . 15) in conjunction with the developers contribution. Staff requests permission to advertise for bids for these water line improvements . Please place this on the next Council agenda for their consideration. GL/gh DOCUMENT: MEMO/WAT.LN FOLDER: PLANNER / - lf rit,._.,.. ___E_ __4 f.; .D_E i. HeGn�A T i iiii ,...jtos r° 1 [PI .-, _ . Ills . - I:, ,z4,3 4 i 1 .‘466 ______ - „ , • ,,M. If MHO 0-t;— .i.: . 1.164:711\. • ,1-01\3-. �i�; " , PROPOSED I �� ; j. PROPOSED 8 LINE A ..,• :111111111111111111111 I • OAKWOOD -� �" : ESTATES %- --�-- III;-- w '- --�.�.�� s INF ANL. ' II==. MUEIS4. PRICE , 1 -►•1 . • w-,a07 I % ,; PROPOSED __--_ 1, �m ; � . 12 LINE - ; 'i i; �o a 61a r�1211T I - ii i i!!i 11■11 i� 11 111>t'11 t .�■ !! '' !� t"1i11�11�i11ii1 i rilll�llit---_- ^ i i!i .iil�lllllllllillliIi tl�llll h___, • %i , . I " 3 s 711Ri9I111111111111111111U1I111 !!�; 1 M1111111111111 In 11111 ,. .. .., ,/ f/ 8 11111111111 DAVID DOUTUUT .1 il . %A111 all„ .�; • k Illlllli\; .—,.oro 1 DENTON - • 1111u11e11111111► '° " ©.M0=01115 _ 111�111111111111• TARRANT '°- actrycNat A IMP. ilik-cz— i a ...... iikir DA ID D®MT�111 �' kk 41 iii- s . ill TIL,,„„_-- n.... i 1.1 .,- . . IAilk _ _bp.. *4, rot go COAT It'II 41111141, , a 1 If ........ • .--. -. !IIVRI lilia; • • q Ala \ :MIL 1 .... 0.11. . m m an x,gm \ s 1 .11n,ilittli(1)-M 4 ex ilmMIAI •ma im I lel L ilifi II ii ® \ >�:� . 311.I. h ai.. EXISTING 6" 1i?E III2,-, ii, ,, . 303 um --I 3/1111k.JA K lbw, K 1 i V ' MIM IQ x �t/;�. Iiiiiiiii % CITY OF SOUTHLAKE / . 4, ie �- �'��' ' N I �R� 'O� WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS " i ,1� EXISTING 8" r ' .IE EXTENSION OF WATER LINES ON N. WHITE CHAPEL TO BE REPLACED Warp14 JAN. '.93 WITH 12" el 11, V. MIN I Lit 5 (i- . ,_ ; ? r , / AI - -- - - -- `'� 1 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM CITY AN AG February 23, 1993 � TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for Fire Protection Attached is the fiscal year 1992-93 Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for fire and EMS protection with Denton County. This agreement is renewed annually in cooperation with Denton County for mutual fire service protection in the Southlake area. Research was done by Fire Service Director, Jerry Williams and his findings revealed we have made two runs to unincorporated Denton County. Both runs were made to the area of the old restaurant and club known as Froggies . Most of the runs made over the last three years are mutual aid calls to the City of Trophy Club (approximately eight calls in 1992 ) . This agreement agrees to pay $85 per call to any part of Denton County and we have received $5, 000 from Denton County for the last three years . For your information, we are also attaching a map showing the Denton County Fire Districts . The proposed renewal of this agreement has been reviewed and we recommend that it be approved and signed by the appropriate people. The contract is left without a closing date because these types of contracts are not renewed on set dates and this will keep the service to the citizens intact until renewed. I am available for any questions or comments that you might have. //;/1 BC/mr Attachments (2 ) wp\Memo\Dncolnl4.Agm • , • 1. IQ) f1 • ♦C l .q.b.gyp • i r BRUCE ISAACKS OFFICE of • CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY C. i S:CRETAR^ 1 110 W.HICKORY PHONE: 817.383.8399 OENTON,TEXAS 76201 WATTS: 1400-346-3189 METRO: 1214 434.7925 • January 12 , 1993 Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for Fire Protection Dear Ms. LeGrand: Enclosed please find REVISED duplicate originals of your Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for Fire Protection for fiscal year 1992-93 with Denton County. Please obtain the appropriate signatures and return both originals, in the envelope provided, to this office so we may place it on the next Commissioners Court agenda. One of the originals will be returned to you after they have been signed in Commissioners Court. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Elizabeth Floyd Administrative Legal Assistant Enclosures sue-, z THE STATE OF TEXAS ) ( COUNTY OF DENTON ) ( INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES This agreement is made and entered by and between Denton County, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "County, " and the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE a municipal corporation or incorporated volunteer fire department located in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "Agency. " WHEREAS, COUNTY is a duly organized political subdivision of the State of Texas engaged in the administration of County Gov- ernment and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton County; and WHEREAS, AGENCY is a municipal corporation or incorporated volunteer fire department, duly organized and operating under the laws of the State of Texas and is engaged in the provision of fire protection service and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton County; and WHEREAS, AGENCY is the owner and operator of certain fire protection vehicles and other equipment designed for the extin- guishing of fire and prevention of damage to property and injury to persons from fire and has in its employ trained personnel whose duties are related to the use of such vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and AGENCY mutually desire to be subject to the provisions of V.T.C.A. Government Code, Chapter 791, the INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUTIILAKE 1 Interlocal Cooperation Act and Sections 352 . 001 and 352 . 004 Local Government Code and contract pursuant thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, COUNTY AND AGENCY, for the mutual consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows: I . The effective date of this agreement shall be the 1st day of October, 1992 . II. Services to be rendered hereunder by AGENCY are fire protec- tion services normally rendered within the AGENCY Fire Department, as hereinafter defined, to citizens of COUNTY, to wit: A. Availability and provision of emergency fire prevention, extinguishment, safety and rescue services within the agreed or specified territory or jurisdiction of the AGENCY Fire Department; said services to be rendered as described herein by said Department in all unincorporated areas within the above referenced operating territory or jurisdiction of such Department, the referenced services as set out herein are rendered by said Department in consideration of the basic funding referenced elsewhere herein and the per-call fee set out elsewhere herein, for the common good and benefit and to serve the public convenience and necessity of the citizens of Denton County who are not otherwise protected with respect to fire prevention, extinguishment, safety, and rescue services. INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUTIILAKE 2 B. The AGENCY Fire Department shall respond to requests for fire protection services made within COUNTY as set out in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto designated area . #11 of SOUTHLAKE and incorporated by reference. C. The COUNTY agrees that in the event a fire in the desig- nated area of the AGENCY is considered to be of incendiary nature by the AGENCY and upon request by the AGENCY, the County Sheriff will dispatch investigation personnel to the fire scene within a response time sufficient to legally maintain and protect all evidence of said fire and will conduct all appropriate investiga- tion and prosecution of arsonists. D. It is further agreed that the AGENCY shall not be re- sponsible for investigations of suspected incendiary fires in rural area, but shall be expected to cooperate with the County Sheriff in immediately relating all pertinent information possible to the investigator(s) . E. It is recognized that the officers and employees of AGENCY ' S Fire Department have duties and responsibilities which include the rendition of fire protection services, and it shall be the responsibility and within the sole discretion of the officers and employees of said Fire Department to determine priorities in the dispatching and use of such equipment and personnel, and the judgment of any such officer or employee_ as to any such matter shall be the final determination. INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUnILAKE 3 S/b- • III . The COUNTY shall designate the County Judge to act on behalf of COUNTY, and to serve as "Liaison Officer" between COUNTY and AGENCY. The County Judge or his designated substitute shall: insure the performance of all duties and obligations of COUNTY herein stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of COUNTY in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and provide supervision of COUNTY ' S employees, agents, contractors, sub- contractors, and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms, and conditions of this Agreement for the mutual benefit of COUNTY and AGENCY. IV. AGENCY shall: ensure the performance of all duties and obli- gations of AGENCY as herein stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of AGENCY in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and provide immediate and direct supervision of the AGENCY employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors, and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms, and conditions of this Agreement for the mutual benefit of AGENCY and COUNTY. V. For the services hereinabove stated, COUNTY agrees to pay to AGENCY for the full performance of this agreement, the sum of FIVE THOUSAND ($5, 000 . 00) DOLLARS upon execution of this agreement INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUTIILAIE 4 sir- 6 and the sum of EIGHTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($85 . 00) per fire call in the designated unincorporated areas of Denton County, Texas. AGENCY understands and agrees that payment by COUNTY to the AGENCY shall be made in accordance with the normal and customary processes and business procedures of COUNTY, and in conformance with applicable state law. County agrees to provide to Agency an STX 800 MhZ radio for the use of Agency in carrying out the terms of this contract. This radio will remain the property of the County and will be returned on termination of this agreement. County will bear the risk of loss or destruction and make necessary repairs so long as Agency uses the property in a reasonable manner for the purposes of this contract. County reserves the right to reclaim the property at any time for any reason. It is agreed by COUNTY and AGENCY that the radio was provided for in previous contracts between COUNTY and AGENCY. No agreement has been made for an additional radio. VI . COUNTY agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, negligence, and/or omissions of all COUNTY ' S officers, employees, and agents while within its County limits. VII . COUNTY and AGENCY understand and agree that liability under this contract is governed by V.T.C.A. Article 4413 (32c) Sec. 4 (g) and Section 352 . 004 Local Government Code. This agreement is made in contemplation of the applicability of these laws to the agree- INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUI7ILAF.E 5 ment. Insofar as legally possible COUNTY and AGENCY agree to be bound by the above mentioned statutes as they exist as of the date of this agreement. VIII. In the event of any default in any of the covenants herein contained, this agreement may be forfeited and terminated at either party's discretion if such default continues for a period of ten (10) days after notice to the other party in writing of such default and intention to declare this agreement terminated. Unless the default is cured as aforesaid, this agreement shall terminate as if that were the day originally fixed herein for the expiration of the agreement. IX. This agreement' may be terminated at any time, by either party giving sixty (60) days advance written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination by either party, AGENCY shall be compensated pro rata for all services performed to termination date, together with reimbursable expenses then due and as authorized by this agreement. In the event of such termination, should AGENCY be .overcompensated on a pro rata basis for all services performed to termination date, and/or be overcompensated reimbursable expenses as authorized by this Agreement, then COUNTY shall be reimbursed pro rata for all such overcompensation. Acceptance of such reimbursement shall not constitute a waiver of any claim that may otherwise arise out of this agreement. INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUTIILAKE 6 SA-- O X. The fact that COUNTY and AGENCY accept certain responsibili- ties relating to the rendition of fire protection services under this agreement as a part of their responsibility for providing protection for the public health makes it imperative that the performance of these vital services be recognized as a governmental function and that the doctrine of governmental immunity shall be, and it is hereby invoked to the extent possible under the law. Neither AGENCY nor COUNTY waives nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising from the exercise of governmental powers and functions. XI . This agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between AGENCY and COUNTY and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements, either written or oral. This agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both AGENCY and COUNTY. XII . This agreement and any of its terms and provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. XIII . In the event that any portion of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUTTILAKE 7 the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. XIV. The undersigned officer and/or agents of the parties hereto are the properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. XV. Acceptance of this contract constitutes approval of the service area set out in exhibit "A" attached hereto. INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUT[ILAIE 8 EXECUTED in duplicate originals at Denton, Denton County, Texas, on the date first written above. COUNTY OF DENTON AGENCY: BY: BY: County Judge Mayor DATE: ATTEST: BY: 41 /(//4 :-.- re ahief DATE: /-2o-Q3 BY: Deputy, County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant District Attorney • INTERLOCAL FIRE AGREEMENT DENTON COUNTY-SOUTULAI.'E 9 R. s City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM MAN a' r. February 25, 1993 Cl 3 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution 93-23, Authorizing the City Attorney to Proceed With the Condemnation of a Utility Easement for the 5-2 Sanitary Sewer Line. Please find attached the resolution for the condemnation of a utility easement needed for the installation of a portion of the S-2 sewer line. Staff and the City Engineer have been unable to negotiate an acquisition of this easement that satisfies the owner and the City. Please place this item on the next available City Council agenda for their consideration. GL/gh 6-- Attachment: Resolution 93-23 DOCUMENT: MEM93/23.RES FOLDER: PLANNER RESOLUTION NO.6 2 -(13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO BRING A CONDEMNATION ACTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A UTILITY EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE S-2 SEWER LINE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is currently in the process of constructing a major sanitary sewer trunk line within the S-2 drainage basin in order to serve citizens within said drainage basin; and WHEREAS, in connection with the construction of the S-2 sewer line, the City has determined it necessary to acquire an easement across property owned by Greg Kuelbs, known as Lot 2, Parkers Corner, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 388-150, Page 49 of the Tarrant County Deed Records; and WHEREAS, the City, through its authorized representative, has been unable to negotiate a fair market value for the purchase of said utility easement across Mr. Kuelbs' property; and WHEREAS, the City Council now deems it necessary to authorize the City Attorney to initiate condemnation proceedings on the property of Mr. Kuelbs in order to allow for the construction of the S-2 sewer line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1 The City Attorney is hereby authorized to bring a condemnation lawsuit for the purpose of acquiring a necessary utility easement in conjunction with the construction of the S-2 sewer line, including an approximately seven and one-half (7.5) foot wide slakcIl\condcmnLres 1 Page 1 o c -2 w � permanent easement for the purpose of locating, relocating, extending, constructing, reconstructing, improving, maintaining, repairing, and operating sanitary sewer and other utilities, together with such appurtenances as may be necessary, and an adjacent ! approximately thirty five (35) foot wide temporary construction easement for the purpose of construction access to the utility easement. Section 2 The City Council finds that such improvements in this condemnation action are ,; necessary in order to serve the public health, safety and welfare. • PASSED, APPROVED AND EFFECTIVE this day of March, 1993. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: slakef\condemnLres 2 Page 2 01:131BIT • Being a pconanent'utility easement described as§altows: Commending at the northwest corner of Lot 2 of Parker's Cana, an addition to the City of Southlakr,as n:cooled in Volume 388-150. Page 49 of plat recards of Tarrant County, Texas_ Then= S 88•281:03"E fix a.cfistance of 7_50 it to the Point of Beginning. Thence S 88°28'00 E for a distance af 7.50 ft to a pcint. Thence S 0035'00-W for a distance of 29235 ft. to a point. Thence N 882800'W bar a&stance of 7.50 ft.to a poi= Thence N 0035'00"E far a cristance of 29235 ft. to a point,being the Point of Beinning Also included is a construction easement as shown on Fxhihir irf • • _ . . . 11 L. pan a� 'o s44) • -nwoept we limns CBOT CLTO) 91,.....L... CL _ evascalaccao.1001 Tew1i®we wee*am Tem paw paneket goo9L (L AS) Cal:101 KiFD " �ioo Winn •: Alums ISM IIOS IS YWfa Its SLIT Sir�� 7"�V �! 44i I.�4 • �'c/ a aoo• yvw=i �, MILLTEED 0 ■T •i43 'PRI 4iim I "�� 9IIGlZL17100 .09+. �I B -svx3f. JOIN K .ura rti JD e.iall SOd d0 8 3 {d O L-88t 3TffT10A TO U3 210332! SV • a y j lY73 4Ll10S JO JJ70 3HL 01 NOWOQr Try "23:04:100 SAE:D4TM 30 Z len SSW1V SN2 2903S AIIY1.MYS Q3SOd027d 1 x 1 1 1 107 .0S-L I I _ I I 1 - a1 g= K .1 to 1 DVAPPY s D3 1 ZP7 r 1v1� r. srd bs1-seF 'DI • d I ar m �w I I h- S 17. .troo•a XI a;va+ _ ' I - 'ff O"d 1 I I• iv sir I r/07 I • . .06,13sw,.u,'.n I • .Ie nannal , City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 25, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-74 Rezoning to S-P-1 / DalDen Corporation REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning change request for 6.3725 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992D, Tract 22. LOCATION: Northeast corner of T.W. King Road and Bob Jones Road (4285 T.W. King Road) OWNER/APPLICANT: DalDen Corporation CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential BACKGROUND INFO: Annexed into the City of Southlake in 1988 with the present use NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: One (1) from R. Craig Saunders, M.D. , prospective buyer of the eighteen-acre tract West of Showtime Farms site. This property is outside of the 200-foot notification radius. (see attached letter) P & Z ACTION: January 7, 1993; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until January 21, 1993. January 21, 1993, Approved (4-2) subject to Plan Review Summary dated January 15, 1993, amending items #3 and #8 and recommending approval of the 100% masonry variance. (Staff recommended adding "and drives" to item #8. ) January 14, 1993 Review Summary "3. Bufferyards are required as follows: North - 10' Level 'F2' East - 10' Level 'F2' South - None * West - 10' Level 'D' ** * Table Two on page 42-8 does not address 60' R.O.W. ** This assumes that T.W. King is a residential street because of Trophy Club Estates and the fact that T.W. King is not a collector North of Bob Jones Road." "8. Please add the following notes to the plan: - All parking and drives shall be of an all weather surface material." 7A- I Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager ZA 92-74, Rezoning February 25, 1993 Page Two P & Z Recommendation "3. Bufferyards are required as follows: North, East, South - 10' Level 'F1' with eight: (8) foot wooden fence Delete Bufferyard 'D' along T.W. King Place all bufferyards at the time of initial construction. "8. Adding "and drives" to item #8 per Staff recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION: February 2, 1993; Approved to table until January 16, 1993 (6-0) February 16, 1993; Approved (5-0) subject to the Plan Review Summary dated January 28, 1993 with the following revisions: * No extremely hazardous chemicals per 29-CFR-1910-119, as amended * No highly reactive or explosive chemicals or a combination of chemicals to be processed or stored on site * Grant 100% variance to the masonry requirements * Grant front yard variance to allow 25' setbacks' along T.W. King Road and Bob Jones Road * Require bufferyards as follow: North: "D" without canopy and understory trees at the time of Phase 6 or 7 construction East: "D" without canopy and understory trees at the time of Phase 6 or 7 construction South: "D" without canopy and understory trees at the time of Phase 4 construction West: "D" without canopy trees only, South' of the existing main entrance, at the time of Phase 4 construction "D" without canopy trees only, North of the existing main entrance, at the time of parking lot construction * Paving should be all weather surface for new construction; gravel drives and parking may remain until new construction. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Third Plan Review Summary dated February 25, 1993. KPG 7A -z SC)U'I'HW!-NST E1 Ri'HOPI )IC INS'I'ITU'I'I: 1:1)I:11:I I'..IS.\11.I-SS.\I.I) January 29, 1993 ('l1.\1:1 I S I'..((n NIA) RI R1:1 AI.I)u'I:U:\N.\I I). I'I\NI.I•I I I I:I(;(IS.\I I) KI.\'IN(;II I.\I.I), Development Board 11.(;,,,,,,,,,1,<,.\I.I). City of Southlake I'llll I II`NI.GI:\1 111.NIA). 667 North Carroll Southlake, Texas 76092 S. Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, ILI('11\RI)I'. JI)NI-S.NIA/ I)()N.\I.I)NI.NI\I 1.1)IN.NIA). I would like to introduce myself. I am R. Craig Saunders, M.D., an .I.\.\I':,I'.'\I"`"1(„ SI'_'<''.\I.I). Orthopedic Surgeon. I am thinking of purchasing 18.55 acres on Bob '.\\II:S I..OI(f"'I"'""'r'.\.c.s. Jones and White Chapel Road. This is near the Dallas—Den Gas S('()I-I ().I'.\S<'ll\I \I D. Company. It has come to my attention that this corporation is M-I.\R\'IN I'..V\.I I.\1..\I.1) thinking of expanding its storage facilities on the property. The ,;1 I\N S.\\111.1.11:SS..\I.I). future of Southlake will not be one of industrialization but will be one of residential home owners. Your tax base will be dependent upon us homeowners. I realize that Dallas—Den Gas has grandfather rights in terms of activities on its property. However, it will lower the property values and the subsequent tax that will run government services at the city of Southlake. Obviously, I have a vested interest in maintaining high property value and hopefully this area will develop into one of the nicer suburbs of the Dallas/Fort Worth area. Ideally, it will develop along the same lines as Keller or Colleyville, but hopefully more rural and friendly atmosphere for single family housing units. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 214/902-1431. Sinc e , r a . . RCS:gh • •1 4 J. if 211 :No 11 I WIN 211 1II2 I ;.:.I :\11 I:\1;1:\\1 II 1 I 2.11 I Ir. II:\I\1, .'I I'>I sums 7Fl .3 5926-FOXES IIPARK ROAD DALLAS,TEXAS 75235 4110 DalDen Corporation "S-P-I" Detailed Site Plan Notes 1 . This is an existing business which has operated on this site since the early 1960 ' s . The company has operated as Western Company, General Texas Corporation and for the last four years as DalDen Corporation. 2 . The City of Southlake annexed this and surrounding properties in 1989, and placed them in the "AG" Agricultural zoning district. This zoning application and site plan for "S-P-I" is to change the zoning so that it accurately reflects the existing usage of the property and provides for the orderly improvement and expansion of the business . 3 . The DalDen Corporation is in the business of contract packaging of various products . The following is a list of the types of products DalDen has packaged and the processes they have used. a. Liquid product filling in all sizes from 1 fl . oz . through 55 gallons b. Powder packaging from 3 oz . through 55 pound bags c . Production blending of liquids d. Production blending of powders e. Hot blending of products f . Production assembly requiring hand and machine operations g. Production welding, brazing, and soldering h. Production painting i. Production sewing j . Production heat sealing of plastic k. Production silk screening 1 . Production printing m. Packaging of items for Commercial and Government use n. Light metal fabrication o. Plastic extrusion or blow molding Using the above listed processes, the following products have been previously produced and packaged. ( 1) Decontaminating agents for government (a) Powdered/granular Dry blending, laboratory testing, packaging, silk screening, dust control procedures • 1 �.......... DEC 15 92 um 1hr L5. `J qA r (b) Liquid Liquid blending, heating, cooling, laboratory testing, filling cans and pails, sealing, production welding, induction soldering, cleaning containers (paint preparation),, production painting, packaging, silk screening, hand assembly, palletizing (2 ) Carpet cleaners, floor Liquid blending, cleaners, floor strippers, laboratory testing, waxes, polishes filling plastic bottles and pails, silk screening packaging, palletizing (3) Paint removers Viscous liquid blending, laboratory testing, 'filling cans ( 1 pint - 1 gallon) , packaging and palletizing (4) Paint thinners, solvents, Liquid blending, brush cleaners, etc. laboratory testing, filling metal cans ( 1 pint - 5 gallon) and plastic bottles . Labeling, silk screening, packaging, palletizing (5) Commercial automotive Liquid and powder products such as acids, blending, laboratory wire wheel cleaner, testing, filling metal whitewall cleaner, car cans, plastic bottles wash detergents, and pails, silk screen- brake fluid ing, packaging, pallet- izing. ( 6) Industrial tire sealant Viscous liquid blending, laboratory testing, filling plastic bottles and pails, filling metal drums, labeling, packag- ing. (7 ) Waterproofing compounds Hot blending, cooling, packaging in metal cans and drums, labeling, palletizing (8 ) Encapsulating compounds, Liquid filling in plastic cable splicing materials bags and metal cans, and kits assembly, heating sealing plastic, lab testing, packaging, palletizing, labeling, embossing, etc. (9 ) High intensity foam Blending, packaging, labeling, testing, etc. 7a-5 This "S-P-I" zoning request is to continue to allow all of the above listed processes and land uses, and to continue to allow for the production and packaging of the wide variety of products at the facility shown on this detailed site plan. The products shall NOT include any chemical on the current "Extremely Hazardous Chemical" list. fik (MISC) 910034/12-15-92/p.I of I/BLH:vh . DALDEN SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART REQUIRED SCHEDULED PARKING PARKING LOADING SPACES BUILDING AREAS SQ. FT. CONSTRUCTION BLDG. /TOTAL PROVIDED REQUIRED/PROVIDED Existing Office 6, 081 SF 1961-1992 21 Existing Warehouse 22 ,588 SF 23 44 49 4 7 1 . Warehouse Expansion 4, 500 SF 1993 5 49 49 4 5 2 . Secondary Containment ---- 1994 -- 49 49 -- 5 3 . New Driveway & Covered Dock ---- 1994 -- 49 49 -- 7 4 . Warehouse Expansion & Metal Bldg. Relocation 17 , 681 SF 1995-1996 15 64 70 4 7 5 . Covered Tank Area 2 , 990 SF 1995-1996 3 67 70 4 7 6 . Future Production 14, 000 SF 1999-2000 11 78 85 5 9 7 . Future Production Building 14, 000 SF 2002-2004 14 92 92 6 9 Final Office Total 4, 625 SF 16 92 92 6 9 Final Warehouse Total 75, 759 SF 76 a ERAL NOTES: Gross Area of Property 277 ,586 SF 6 . 3725 Acres ROW Dedication 1 , 869 SF 0 . 0429 Acres Net Area of Lot 1 275, 717 SF 6 . 3296 Acres 2 . Existing Dalden industrial facility property annexed and zoned "AG" agricultural, requested zoning "SP-1" detailed site plan for current and future industrial uses in existing and future planned buildings . 3 . Maximum height 35 feet, 2 1/2 stories . *4 . Front yard setbacks (on both T.W. King Road & Bob Jones Road) 25 feet (variance requested) 5 . Side yard setback 15 feet - ' '--,'7`r, ri'.c ':' ,_ 1ry DALDEN SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART - Cont. Page 2 6 . Rear yard setback 10 feet *7 . Variance requested for no buffer yards *8 . Type of construction: metal industrial buildings in conformance with existing buildings variance requested from masonry requirements (see photographs of existing buildings ) 9 . Driveway gates shall normally be closed 10 . Existing water service is from an 8 inch water line extended across T.W. King Road from the City of Trophy Club through an intercity agreement with the City of Southlake. The water meter and fire hydrant are located at the main entrance to Dalden. 11 . The existing buildings are served by septic tanks and septic drainage field shown on the site plan. 12 . Building coverage changes through the phased construction. a. With the existing buildings - 10 . 4% building coverage, 89 . 6% open space b. After Phase 5 Improvements - 19 . 0% building coverage, 81 . 0% open space c . After Phase 7 Improvements - 29 . 2% building coverage, 70 . 8% open space 1.-J . The existing concrete pavement area between the three (3) existing metal warehouse buildlings is periodically used for outside storage (approximately 14, 000 square feet, 5% of site) . This area is planned to be enclosed in Phase 4 and outside storage will be reduced to the approximately 2 , 700 square feet concrete area between the covered loading docks . * Variances requested BLH/cjb ECI No . 910034 1 ' r Fy j° ' H. HARRIS �I "I.G.'�EL=.SEA .... I 1 I .... - • - .1 •1 .\--1 / ;'• PHILLIPS .- <, df' I A. •I91?I3 I 4 ': I I `�-' T I I 1 I -'`` =--- _` I I I I +•{ J.D. 2gc/IU. I H. THROOP � I I ,II1 A_ PAISE • • \\ �II ) . I I 1 I „113AAHAFFav 4' +i • II • • • I --- 11 _ �-� = IEl3 D. PRICE `I /) i l . -7,i - ------- . _l__tll"�+_ _ I I(a v \ _ - lri~ i � -- J T------3j)iii ,03.1 ,.. ., K . �Il tlh1�I r. 1111111 ' W. MILLS nIll:Iulll 6111inuii� - ;- %i "' ,Y IIIIIItl111A111111t111111N111 ,; 7 r�EU.1�III.IIIIINIIIIIIIIINI Q ate.,, 4ry: !IMiIre"'i 111 111111 ''�; "`�'12.4� rMT ,t Lill DA4/10 DOUYgIY I r--. �T, ` it 1 1t111U11►�4 `�� _ - �_ utiui.u'.luu► DENTDN � ._.,::: um. 1 J. HENRY I W. MILLS •.I IIItl111111Niro' TARRANT ., i v______vi J��— — — t—: — 1 .. -- w DAVIDMDOUTHI �Ic_i_ . Ileilbiag TIT\ \ !9ou . , L .= 1, ' map � , i� ` 4 U.t� MARTIN w W Wes. .. 1;. : �'J � ' REI'. D. o ¢ I CM. THIR OOP 1L 1 ., 4 _J____ ', 1—- 4... 1 . ,, titlt mil, " l v a, ' 1 .,. - `C7�1� 6WE3 3.`a��2AAYINI 1 ;pRD ��+�� ' IIT.WJ Hi--''... O + JA . CHI • �C:Ilu1E1 ; I 1 �A v it„ 'li ;� 1G yl FK ii - -1. _,, ., ... _.,„.... " a j �i co- + ---• :EL " I--j I u w l a w. Wad,. I-I-.--. 72J.Aigii .,,,,„iir ;\\,-„ , . __,,,,. i'' . \ , . . , . , : ., ALW. 9pARTIBAI C. DART " �; REEDY III J. WEST J ' < I ,I r..w.._,„ • I is 1 ' I _ {� ` _ i r,x.-•xl•i�. -- A�SA I i LOAW H. �N-. IS `—�ld,�' ��, �Ati y�� I„y1 -- .' ..S .IV I' r I% —oao OHM CH.+'=Sffi . < _11, • �' +�j`'-,', �20�� Tao � 'I I ;�_ "1 "� fillatio111454•AriiHL-17:-. R 7 I ., ==�, toe i -/ um�'�11/1 , I I I�� 1 n I© I' �Irq^!� �• iiM • -1 'UPI 2r i�� .III�1_• < / .T� i �/ Ii i i az MALLmar W.W. HAIL "I. .II K i / j i i� ..• I I ra-f I , i i • U. S. Corps of .Engineers 1 I . (c1) ?S:2 Cox, D Holley, J • P q "AG" "AG" TR7A IC „,, \. 3.685 AC n 0' 1��E O S g2 TR7 P'g TR6 5 AC 35.854 AC .1 . . . 1 TR 22 6.361 AC q a ' U x o` o - z t I3 H - Gilbert, G "AG" _ • • TR9 g 16.32 AC• TR 10 • °' ° 0 PEE E 6Ac - i ^ TR8 Sgg� 0 4.43 AC A 'IR -10 City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-74 REVIEW NO: THREE DATE OF REVIEW: 2/25/93 PROJECT NAME: Site Plan for SP-1 Zoning Request - Dalden Corporation Lot 1, R.D. Price No. 922-D Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Dalden Corporation Everaqe Consultants P. O. Box 1865 2630 W. Freeway, Suite 100 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Phone: ( 817 ) 430-4288 ' Phone: ( 817 ) 429-7560 Fax: ( 817) 491-3809 Fax: ( 817) 429-9322 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/22/93 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS . IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817 ) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . We find that the applicant has met all the requirements of our previous reviews . * Although technically there would be four (4) loading spaces required for buildings 6 and 7, the applicant has provided one more loading space than required for the entire complex. Staff does not have a problem with the loading spaces as shown. * All signs and culverts must be permitted separately. All drives will require culverts . * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Dalden Corporation Everage Consultants 1a-rI • • / ',EA NOTES $ 9 HLY Iro00E0 / UNDEVELOPED 1.EAlsnnG PAL .T.DASTW.LL PACIl2n PROPEan i Sm LOCATION 13 t @ m I - ZONED'AG'AGRICULTURAL .nNE.CO RID 20NED'AC•CDICULTUR,u_ REOuE5R0 b sot °Y� $ LAND USE PLAN-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 20+MC-5-P-I'DEFACED SIT PLAIN FOR CURRENTMO FUNRE USES UTURE -y 0 a d tea. s.mst C RN•rn ERASER ��94 RAN EO 60IL0m05w NOTN EENTREu[T uSrtmC nAL Rt1635 tNGS MO F ArER1•L5• ?ROPEY OL06, �= we.0...s•A.e i 4 b r , 1/2'In71111.a S 89.27'25" E w .,...,� �'^m' ' - f't• °r[m°ni.Ls Rii eE PERwTFEDS AND NO EAPCOSUE [ST4Tit4 i,., 4nbn 451�72 r F _ .••.. .....T.........w........w...-w..•.....y.... I'.............. • .... w.. ...w • • 1n 2 ALL°5NPSTERs SPACL BC SCREENED M FOVR SUES tll ¢�r3' O )Q — 'G� _ \ nc..r• __ 1�SIDE_TARS SEEBA0N-_ -s' sfs OO,O 3vARiWCE CR.110,Dee uASONRT Rt0o RENENri CI: 30EITHLAUD FUTURE DRIVEWAYC§; FIRE LANE _ A ut nc,Pu+K,Nc AREAS Ono NCR Da K.,rs aAtt 1 _ _ Q� BE°s MT A4 KFAMER SURFACED MATERIAL N 'C r~•',I' (- ) I I 1 1s NIua1.•r,.F A P I 1 I `v\ 1 \'A t�`) S BoFFERTARD REOCOREMENI5 °q''N' •0 - 5? ) �J 1 I I I I I I I I I 'A `9•r 50VM-SHRUBS A AN-CENTER TAUT PIN+SC 4 rF S I T L'•- _A_I I I I_i-� _r u• \�' REST-SHRUBS i M-CENTER AND ukOER-STORD TRCES Al.F E- _ - `� GRASS :?-- \ es` 20'ON-CENTER NUN PHASE. R�Affi IT ti a` •�///1��{}++vJ�� T� L _ AKIN-s..BS :or.-CETER .M PN.sE 6 a I t -�-k .- '_ - - ` I.., v S`SV \ —— -1\w Jr EAST-SHRUBS.1 M-CENTER ON PHASE 6 �' UTURE -- -` ��J11"' :TI —— 1 \,..) 6 M,MMUM NCIOTT JS FEET.2 1/2 STORES } rO mM TRIOS 1r rN.IIs..r 1 vac lra VICINITY MAP 8 I y„ ARKING-°- sw.r ntm C a TO .Eo I I r° �N 6`� T SEE AIIONS o ENST1NRmOTOCR.Pns FOR ARCMirtc MR2y _ p 'Ao COONccnO.TEL R NODE TO CA APPRO. - f-'I [C[rADMS a[uSRINL BULLC.DIDC TALL.RE OF TIC MS 'N • } rV, - b Krl w FIa'.WIC BUDS'Ai BE RRo[ARD 1�� I `C •w F LV - £z„ `L 0 AND FUNK Pa000CTM BUICD�NLS TALL BE OF MC SAME Z I \,... •Pe, TVE ANp Sr.( �e F-�l �! \ LL �p tEuSaNG QITSDC STORAGE St l )+ALL BE MASCO OJT $ I /o .• -' h,I'Aw .@E F i URE •4',, �� wM BvnnlNc cAPAINva.s is 1 g 'v i ' FUT BUIlD1NG . '1 ' SMEOULEO C°NsmuCTwN p y•J, 6000 • CRASS it-t- ® PRODUCTIONS Fl. PP `A �i CR':i o,¢i' 1H1-TH2 LEGEND p.F:�•�•, 1. ��[[D I--' B 4.000 w N IR ® mw,c..¢s F 6v7 Q 'GIT trT�I $ MIN FT.56! q '\I r L 4- Qi .wfr°NII R$,NNA. IRO ¢ H111.0.TAPD i� 1, 1� ZO 2 .' TOTER • I _ 1: \ O IIco ne coefe..tef .SSA 1.O.F..c tl I JP,. - LP GAS BELL I © --- :• HEP6LY TH. •,a. ATAAn.A LN4IOR 30 15 0 30 -_60 C I w y o¢ 4'/, •• _ TANK - s ® la i ---..1,-,I .1 _ W000�.D °'RORAiow r• ow1..n �= 2 oM y Q 0_ • 2a1 PR Aar .ArtA 2 ,.m ��P ', eln"c m A SCALE .tl: _D i11TT' 9 1111 '_I- ` t ‘ D wrc .IV... 1rH .o DOORS I tRy `� ® •4i� _ EXISTING BRICK ., m ; mm • e�� ' O SCALE: 1• 30' 3 A/ 8• 'N `as' OFFICE BULDING COVERED„ e....� ;1+ F:. .o.`w I .'' putt ®m4,02 r"1 1H. I 2.325 S9 FE. ARIyIf:G� a(.1 '2~a y © rNAa+•.Oa �ikD �� ... .• LAN •E � F.L........... ,. o: �DAc� TmD . r ',�,•" FARE ` V 1 g,�. T 9 d I F � r ASPHALT '' i87 `' ``` LEGAL DESCRIPTION /®Le(�r u1°i.M.+.¢ FIRE LANE PAVEMENT I V L ,�L\ SI• wo. jy, .rM�.F w� 11, LEY B` /2' Fter Cm wee'u'A.�'�1 3y� ��1MT w� OTIt CORP.• .E',/� hum Nam. A UID G natal O O —J rDG�M�' ' / vAq N TA6KO (y 14,000 59 fl. IN I LAND USE PLAN MEDIUM OENSI RESIOENRAL tram l6 POnr OF BCONNMC Tn.s.In.ost"mar of lot 121)- �� N I • • .y I( 1=3Ak�A uIN FF.767 oanl Ow aUm.Lclon lo.ucue y PI..we e el JT 1 [�wr 1 i 9iEIDATA C45n41 B.9.6.169,DOOR.PFw.x 69'Oq']6'Pw,6659 test oe o..$ i ' b • TRAILER OORr 1 r. •1•N m-•••16•C n 75 I., a ■ / ®NET COCA 0 of QA g • © 1 • Euune. T.96i r. `S 3r25.Day la \ + -Z CMST,MCIAI BUM.NL i 1 1 Mfh.IN 0D'J2']0'E..0 s e H m ` �_ 2.300 59.f t• •COVERED ®ONTAINI[EN'I' I 1 • ,•r.RE.VS 1 2TarM sr. .17...was Io a 1/2'C'3.l..m I,+1 I'' o:ru l^ -HrtFr.520 eo n.DAIDEN V.8 Q 1 ' 1 ° __ coKT+ED ROE O ''R LOAD NG . SECONDARY I .;,;n.,c F="n.a,=a�.36=i( n 2.`�wF' DANCE s aC2r2s E avocet. .yn1-o-ea,I..n a opals 11i Q °~ y t= Lo OPEN CONCRETE Q D I ay.mAz .m S?�a eS Jtl.or 1 o ?mTwln.of.ae Duna 1�t..51 n n to°1/r awn.l.n:awPU.1 to.. COVERED 23 A6 n ln•nr na RA.I can O CON••ETEleRWE-Q9 ®Q - rANAAREA w 30' • ', . EXISTING EM RGENCY I DANCE 5 36•.a'29•E cwlmn..q..0 N.wmcN Done..140 63 n.to e ANSION# SNOrER Q m I I 1/2'aanete.:m PEI IN.of It'•east.,nwtNael corns, EXP CONCRETE I Y 0TRUCKi BUIi•D4 5% 00 59.F1. - PAVEMENT —r 55EANL MEN.5 o07POY w.,u In.Ha awnaaT m.ar Heouttn vaal IEN,S WELL, © UILDING EXPANING w1101:111111111111 W00D �.1e m n I a /2•dame. pn Ia.w.m. n�:o-':aw°j p tF SION DIR.llpsT J ED , ne.,aa main ..'.0 B/ B / 2 3 Boo,m.Rme,s and bent)m e.t w I DALOCN Vaal y' DIR,LIGHT 14,10®9.Ft. 5NE0•, E)DSTINC METAL D I 1 BUILDING .� MEN.N 69V9.36•w nth Ron UUnrm-ea, 5w 62 O (OLEO CALL 536m FT) x'E• 'N.. LP GAS TANK( ,� I O l0 1n•goes 1 BIITR AT name cmlannq 6 3715 awH a1 lone a......,•e on U. 2'T ;� D 10,345 S9.F 1. 9 I q.T,m n u manta N...,6�,wq2,er eKRA.cMsutr.wrz we ♦ EXISTNG METAL 1 M E". f yi.111 O BUILDING - GRASS // R g 1 l O a v 12.243 s9'El- DALDEN CORPORATION u �rr.�C Ai, CO.Aar •- • DA..IaT/ I SITE PLAN FOR AN•5-P-1-ZONING REQUEST \I;'39.0.' I ■ R BUILDING EXPANSION T q.�.ean nNNcN -- / I E ?or.. M o.an.a•••FSNa FOR � O 0 t 0 3,575 59.F1. GRASS LOT 1 t: . ;Tate a�.MND(R5T0T 0 __ _ _ D,(�p�� !,� i R.D. PRICE NO. 992—D ADDITION —1 •0.9. . MJJ I 25'Buapnc LINE,_ ~A -�`-' ��" ——�- BEING A 6.3725 ACRE TRACT OUT OF THE o`An w�W F,xtt s CRASS R O.W_DEDICATIO,_ 1 R.D.PRICE SURVEY,ABSTRAC7 ND.992, �SnRueS i OC.RIM PnASE M c rE 61 L . 21 ' - •'.y.'_-_..- .. -S it:stwl Oil OF SOUTHLAKE. DENTON COUNTY,TEXAS a��% '. 8909t.I1.M'IPN �� T •••-y�,�� sj r i76..IIw., 2 FEBRUARY 17,1993 O:w ._�� a'�'� � ./IfIl//I17�f�rl�/i%I.J�Jy,5c-" Fu 1n /2-IAF.\,- N 89'09 36 W A-�� 1.c.on., 6r Ong RE sED PER an cmx z APPROVAL rteau wr 14 1993 Yam. TUR[V.. - n.c••o,Awwrua.M.A•xO OLIO) Lvf. _540.82' '`A -_ in. •• /-N OWNER/DEVELOPER I Isu Fm _ _ _ _ A 1.AT.a.T �. _- _ ;• ; k_. ' -—BOB—JONES-ROAD— .__, _ 4 (PROPOSED 6DJ2 D WA C.L EMSTIXEPAVCYENT` DALDEN CoRPIX Ancei YERACE r ==--_—__ , LASER -- ax=r .w 7.- -- . -- _- SDUMRME.FFaAS T609] CONSULTANTS .•r t•.IIo m r Sam a u'asn.O Po..aSsjP,D eoR e65 NCNF Ea2•PL•Nn.aS•SJRKNORS 1 UNDEVELOPED A O(8II TEXAS 76051 .1 PLAIT 'AG' DEN AGRICULTURAL AA (NI7).30-.266 2.30 rt.1 F.•..ar)S...I•TO. iE RISER LAND USE PLAN-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTAL rwa (617)491-3609 Fo.t w n To.o. 8102 r (61i)•29-7560 SORT ATTN: CARY REED. FAR(617)A29-9322 NCE PRESIDENT OPERATIONS ECF91003A CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-81 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480 , AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACK OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 6 . 3725 ACRES OUT OF THE R.D. PRICE SURVEY ABSTRACT NO: 992D; :TRACT 22, `BEING MORE COMMONIPLICNOWN':;'AS 4825 T.W. KING ROAD, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" -AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "S-P -1" . DETAILED: SITE :.:PLAN :DISTRICT,:. SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS' CONTAINED" IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI , Section 5 of the ,Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial , residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as i"AGI.M,Y.Agricultural; under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of 480 81 S1'I/OREM11 this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces , and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population; and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets , helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools , parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is' a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS : Section 1 . That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989 , as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 6. 3725 acre tract of land out of the R.D.. Price Survey Abstract :No. . 992D, Tract .22 ` � , :;>befrg> more commonly known as :;4825. T.W. King Road, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein . ixuxi.sruOut m, c':,;:c 2 a. -/S From. "AG" Agricultural District to "S-P-i" Detailed Site Plan District. The above-described tract of land shall be further subject to the development regulations set forth in the '.'I-1" >'Light:':Industrial District and any other restrictions and requirements set forth on the approved site plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B . " Section 2 . That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3 . That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said, Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but -remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified and affirmed. Section 4 . That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for, the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morales and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in, the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5 . That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6 . That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity • of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. dXn.al tip;/omit, Section 7 . Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2 , 000 . 00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8 . All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480 , as amended, or any other ordinances affection zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both ,civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provision, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3 . 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10 . this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1993 . ATTEST: MAYOR CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1993 . ATTEST: MAYOR CITY SECRETARY 48048 LS1'1/OR D/kb "// Page•� APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: 480-81.SP IIORDhb Page 5 �!� —/,r/ F City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 25, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 93-01 Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning change request for 3.0 acres situated in the A. Robinson Survey, Abstract No. 1131-D, Tract 6. LOCATION: West side of North White Chapel Blvd. , North of Sam Bass Ridge Road OWNER: Maryon Richman APPLICANT: Sonia Thompson CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family-1A , LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND INFO: It is Staff's understanding that there is a boundary dispute on this property. The City should take no position on the resolution of this dispute. The only action we should take ' is in regard to the adequacy of the surveyor's plat as submitted. Any further determination will be via the appropriate civil court. NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13) RESPONSES: Two (2) in favor: Carl J. Smith, "I would be in favor this request provided there will not be more than 2 residences on this 3 acres and no mobile homes." Eugene M. Weston, "I am in favor of "SF-1A" zoning. One in opposition: Phillip and Gail Elkins, "The Ward Surveying company's "UNDATED" survey does not correspond with two previous surveys (1944 & 1981) . The north boundary lines from the Ward Survey, are incorrect. They extend into my property in the Robinson and Belcher Tracts which would cut off any reasonable access to my property. My deed of title indicates the proper property lines. 76- 1 F Planning and Zoning Commissioners February 25, 1993 ZA 93-01 Rezoning Page Two P & Z ACTION: February 4, 1993; Approved (5-0) the "SF-1A" Single Family-lA Residential request. COUNCIL ACTION: February 16, 1993; Approved (5-0) , First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-83. 64- KPG 76 - I 5 . • • Smith, Carl J. Schoultz rn Eest F. Johnson, Rodger A. 1 TR 34 Elkins, Phillip TR 33 2.88 AC 3.53 AC TR 3 TR 32 I • 1.4 AC 4.US AC "AG" "AG"• "AG" "AG" Schoultz, Ernest i. 4 TR 4 . 149 AC 2 c'TR 5 . 158 AC "SF-lA" • I, / T 6 Schoultz, Ernest T. A / 3 "SF-lA" King, James W. TR 7 "AG"AC Weston, Eugene M. Perdue, Howard W. TR 8 3 AC 1 - 2 "AG" Arlington State Bank "SF-lA" TR 11 18.658 AC I ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING 3 "AG" TR 9 4 9.73 AC DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT THAT WHEREAS, Maryon Richman, as the surviving spouse of Victor W. Richman , and the independent executrix of the Estate of Victor W. 'Richman deceased, is the owner of a tract of land in the A. Robinson Survey, Abstract No. 1131 , situated in Denton County, Texas, and being the tract described in a deed to Victor W. Richman of record in Volume 413 , Page 126, of the Deed Records, Denton County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described by metes and bound as folio,. BEGINNING at a point in the Westerly line of North White Chapel Blvd . , said point being , by deed calls, 41 . 67 feet West and 918. 25 feet North of the Northeast corner of the R . D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 992 (being called the H. Witt Survey in the above referenced deed ) ; THENCE West 766. 18 feet to a 5/8" iron found at the Southwest corner of the above referenced tract; ;1ENCE N. 10 -' 36 ' 59" E. at 156.46 feet passing a concrete monument under fence and continuing in all 170 . 64 feet to a 1" iron in a Northerly line of said Robinson Survey for the Northwest corner of the herein described tract and of the tract described in Volume 413 , Page 126, above referenced ; THENCE East along a Northerly line of said Robinson Survey and the South line of the I . G. Belcher Survey, Abstract No. 30, passing the Southeast corner of said Belcher Survey, same being a re-entrant corner of said Robinson Survey and continuing in all 765 . 83 feet to a point in North White Chapel Blvd . for the Northeast corner of the herein described tract and of the above referenced tract; THENCE S . 10 - 29 ' - 59" W. 170. 63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 3 .00 acres . 70-5 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-83 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480 , AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY A 3 ':0. ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE A ; ROBINSON SURVE ' s ABSTRACT:>NCJ 1133<.c;<`.TRACT .6 AND MORE FULLY'-AD COMPLETELY. DESCRIBED. 1>3 IN EXHIBIT "Ai' FROM '"AA ':: AGRICT. LTUZZA ; ::TQ;::.;;..:..S.F 1A" SINGLE:: FAMILY 1A RESIDENTIAL SUBJHCT>;'I;b :THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ..CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDIN A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN E OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE of E. -EAS the _ o _ - - - - is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial , residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as " t A<..>.:.<.0.......:. :.>.l ; a;; under the Cit ' s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; anc WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate . neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities ; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces , and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking n Rn.11{/Oltl)/1:1, 0 areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements ; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS : • Section 1 . That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the • 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a gg acre tract of land out of the t act::;::No: :>::::>1: ::3::1D:>::<:>:>T:ra:.. ..; :: ...: :::::<.;: :�':F:.:»::>: >;: :: . : :. :;:;; :>::::. :: �: ::>::; :.:�� ,�, and more fully and completely described.... n .Exhib t wk " attached hereto and incorporated herein. From 'A( > `' Cu to : 1 to ;�'.5:: ;:: I,Ii .,,.. . �..;;.. . , ..;...::;::. F..::ZA .. ..�ing�:� Fainl; »1A Residential . .. area ri /clla /kf M�� 7 Section 2 . That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3 . That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas . All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences , words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4 . That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5 . That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance . Section 6 . That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7 . Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2 , 000 . 00) for each offense . Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense . Section 8 . All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No . 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal , whether pending in court or not , under such ordinances , same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9 . The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is her-eby. directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3 . 13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake . Section 10 . This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1993 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1993 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE : ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: 480.83/ORD/kb 4 l Page 4 // City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 25, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-70 Specific Use Permit / Showtime Farms, Inc. REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for equestrian uses for Showtime Farms, Inc. , being a 9.615 acre tract out of the A. Robinson Survey, Abstract No. 1131, Tract 9. LOCATION: West side of North White Chapel Boulevard, north of Bob Jones Road. OWNER: Mildred M. Moore APPLICANT: Dayle Binder d\b\a Showtime Farms, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential BACKGROUND INFO: The applicant has requested a specific use permit for equestrian uses. The existing residence is to remain and be used by the overseer. NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12) RESPONSES: The City has received seven (7) written responses, all in opposition due to increased traffic, noise, accumulation and runoff of animal waste, dust, and/or devaluation of property values. Three (3) are within 200' : Howard Perdue, 115 Sam Bass Ridge Ronald and Kathleen Cooper, 4553 N. White Chapel Blvd. Ilene Holcomb, 9 Soda Ridge Rd. Three (3) exceeding 200' : S.Z. Moran, #1 Sam Bass Ridge Road Pieter Hye, 4522 Saddle Ridge Road Sharron Brandt, 224 Sam Bass Ridge Road P & Z ACTION: January 7, 1993; Approved (6-1) subject to the Plan Review Summary dated December 31, 1992 deleting item #8 and requiring the maximum number of horses be twenty-five (25) , that there be no horses for rent, that there be no public address system (even hand held) , that there be no lights past 9:00 p.m. in the arena, and that the arena be screened on the West and North with a hedge row for the length of the structure. in - ( Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager ZA 92-70 February 25, 1993 Page Two December 31, 1992 Plan Review Summary "8. One parking space is required for each 3 seats in the arena. Although delineation of stalls is not required with a Concept Plan, please show parking area sufficient for the required spaces." P & Z Recommendation (delete item #8) COUNCIL ACTION: January 19, 1993; Approved to table Resolution N. 93-06, Specific Use Permit for Showtime Farms, Inc. until March 2, 1993. The applicant was to meet with the property owners in Lakewood Ridge in the interim. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Second Plan Review Summary dated January 14, 1993. No revisions to the plan have been made after this letter. Please note the land area in opposition does exceed 20% and will require a super-majority of the City Council to approve this request. KPG r TO: SOUTHLAKE CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAYLE BINDER SHOWTIME FARMS DATE: JANUARY 19, 1993 RE: CASE NO ZA92-70 It is with great sincerity that we at Showtime Farms come before the Southlake City Council to explain, in detail, the proposal for our farm. There are numerous misconceptions regarding the plan, design, use and maintenance of the property, and we would like to address those concerns herein and encourage inquiry from the members of the City Council. First, let me describe Showtime Farms to you. It is a private farm where our clients board horses to be trained and ridden by Paul Haunert, the ultimate goal of which is to show these animals at AHSA rated hunter/jumper shows in this area and around the country. Our clients are a select group of serious enthusiasts who choose the intimate, hands-on approach of a small training environment to pursue their goals of equestrian excellence. Some horses are owned and ridden by our customers who, under Paul's tutelage, compete at rated hunter/jumper shows. Other horses are purchased as investments and their care, training, and show careers are entrusted exclusively to Paul. Having summarized the activity of Showtime, let me address some of the expressed concerns. SANITATION - In the interest of the horses, the stalls are cleaned twice, sometimes three times daily. Removal of the manure has been scheduled, on a regular basis, with an organic soil company so as to preclude odor and unsightly build-up. FLIES - An automatic fly spray system will be installed in the interior of the barn. This system mists a very small amount of an organic fly spray compound into each stall periodically throughout the day. This will eliminate any problem with flies and should alleviate any concerns regarding the environment. BUILDINGS - The main building will be located approximately 300' from the road (well over a city block), and will have a beautiful, traditional brick facade enhanced with landscaping. The light and airy design of the building will include 25 spacious stalls (in compliance with the city ordinance limiting the number of horses), and immaculate aisleway, grooming and storage areas. The covered arena is an open-air building, the lights of which are recessed into the roof. There will be no exterior lights installed on this building. LIGHTS/NOISE/TRAFFIC - We operate, basically, during normal business hours; consequently, there will be no lights on in the arena after 9:00 p.m., easily complying with the ruling of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Training and lessons are provided on an individual basis and only to our limited client base. There is no "noise" which would be noticeable to the surrounding community. There will be no microphones on the grounds. This is a private, exclusive facility. There will be no rentals. Since our clients rely upon us to arrange for transportation of their horses, a commercial shipper will occasionally (an average of once every two months), come to the farm to pick up or deliver horses either going to or coming from some location, usually a horse show. The size of these vehicles averages no larger than a school bus and is usually in the form of a duel-wheeled pick- up truck with a gooseneck trailer. In conclusion, it is our sincerest wish to make Southlake our home and to make our farm an enhancement to the surrounding community. This farm is an expensive undertaking and since the horses would be the most immediate occupants, the barn and facilities must come first. We have no intentions of purchasing additional large blocks of land; our future plans include the building of our home on the property. We want to be become an active, contributing member of the Southlake community and wish to comply with City Council and local residents in any way possible in order to make this a reality. FA -3 r S . I TR A.149 AC 2 5 6 I — — — — I — — — — . TR 5.158 AC — TR 6 3 AC 3 ` 7 King, J "AG" Brooks, B TR 7 , 3 AC. I�.—___ Weston, E "AG" �N TR 8 • 'B sq Arlington State Bank 3 AC 1 2 S' '� �: .. TR a / 91 18.658 AC /, i Cooper, R �cc 5 Meals, J "SF-1A �' TR 9 9.73 AC A . 6 O'/ K� • // Fern �� • / TR 10 JI I / \\ SF-LiS3 8 I I I I AG.. Gorr•viR R 9 /' 4 J7 1 2 AC to Ro1c:arA, L ISteals, J Evans, J Grigsby, M ..sr-1°, f0 I "AG" w p 3 I Q GE . i IS 20 TR A 11 2 ,9 . 9 TR 6 TR 5 A•987 AC 5AC 5AC TR AA TR 3 TR 2 6 AC 12 AC 10.5 AC 12 1 10 — - - - - — I i an • . ,.,.,.. ... . 0 ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING ?I-1-5 City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-70 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 1/14/93 41I1PROJECT NAME: Concept Plan - S .U.P. Request for Equestrian Use Proposed Lot 1, A. Robinson No. 1131 Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Dayle Binder/Paul Haunert Charles R. Little 411 Pecos Trail 4500 Shenandoah Irving, Texas 75063 Dallas, Texas 75205 Phone: (214) 869-4066 Phone: (214) 522-8836 Fax: Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1/11/93 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT ( 817) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . 1. Land area in notes should match description. 2 . Add to the notes : Land Use Designation (L.U.D. ) = Medium Density Residential" . 3 . Label all adjacent tracts with existing L.U.D. from the Land Use Map. i* All entry drives and parking areas must be paved with an all weather surface. * Staff recommends determination of required parking stalls for cars and trailers as a part of the S .U.P. Our ordinance does not address it and several cities we called also have not addressed this type of use. As a starting point, staff would recommend one parking stall for every two horse stables and one trailer parking area for every six horse stables . * Site plan will have to show fire lanes within 150 ' of all exterior walls of all buildings . * This building will be classified as an A-4 occupancy and must meet all requirements of the 1991 Edition of the Uniform Building Code for type of construction, allowable area, area separation, lighting, sanitation and exiting. Contact Lee Roberts, Building Official for additional information. (481-5581 EXT. 747) * Staff has sent the applicant a copy of the Fire Marshalls comments . * Bufferyards are not required for this use due to the adequacy of 'AG' zoning for the proposed use. Ill* Denotes Informational Comment cc: Dayle Binder/Paul Haunert Charles R. Little O�-l� k • . _.... .. ... . . . .. .:- • ..... 1 • .nn-44- r,ti 31 0P0 0.5 ......4•44aa -.. ':r----=:-.=-7 .4-4- ..,Sac Drew. ! tr,1311.4en Slaa•Lana • -- .'"e. ------ ---.S1TE %lac •22D/AG i Lot 1.Il.Doerr • -.•••-- - Duos O.I•anm "-----7 7rt:= .•..----s----.... .-••• '9.,..... 1 Do•Palvn eeeee /fO.V.4-•Dm..- ,X., • 3aa•la J.If•al• • • aloe •/Sll •.../. __.....----N- • 81113//MOM Lai 4 2 3e•mias',Hat.4 ••• 4 4...la•tatnI•on Coop... i%-.....4. i —„--- --..... •c s.s....... ,...--. 3.D.Spillman .=. --,-_•._._ ......--- .....4/... .11.•• ..., , I.J.Oallom.4 I'...:.;-, Dear..termanna• . .I...,----. ----- .____IV-.-- -.1-`- -,.---:---_,...,,-4, I_ ' --4--„,,,a- ...411 ie,./14Ie•am -----,......4... --- . .7:..!---4;.—.-----_-7L.,.....?'11) .D..--..- : (<;" V•D--;.:. 4`` -'-ai..;:i.,4,-.41-/Y1,-.4ntIVO.'-7.7-----&''-'• ..4.1.N.... ' I/) .29'7 ...L- ----t1:-T. =. -..:.•-1 --_ A "VA , ' Z /IC ..............2. -.Ai,.-, OD ---...;',-.., t I .-,.,0" -..- ,......•..--.....1-...,f;,. --. • XISTI G.,Vm'C'•!z ....--, --,-..-,;•-.-, L.t • P .,:t.: .--, ,_,...._...___ ES ID NCgk-r4".S COVERED R/DING l''''•B R'-A R kEIN G 6139 E 4: _ __:!:- . -.--.._r- . t ._,- ./....... ' - • ...1.7. '-'.'''...7 A--4----,-- -17,-- ---z.:7-1-7,7*,,___.-4 -. - ARENA ; t 17:07.4t 3,E: C2,2.59 ...... .;-)...,.• --,..r.^7,29.... _:.‘...;,.._.•„29.--,- -----..-- ......' . .;- ..i'..........._'' ..... . .-..... IS I&, ....' STORAGE BARN !: .........1.21•IT tor,a......• • *. .; ; :..ae.-7.-Trrtf.; .,-.... „ ,, ... •-' ... .. --.. ---. r....----............- -- • .-- C7--" T-....dr. .- .T • . ...,.. .....3.1..2 ,.... ,...Z......,..-.=..--r 7-laria..:."1......,=;,..,-,......." iZ.: . .. 7--...-.--..• -..-1..... I- 1.11. 17-2-- ,.. '• 4...1.1...';1., • 'C.,'..-..-----'- '...-L---•----TS:L:77.17-• *•• .e4k.. i 1; •,-,. .._____4.1-hfi..:__,,, i---:-.•-•-,_.,-. -- ." "".A.-‘/Lit ... ,__,..-_.....- \. ---,-- c •;'.-.-e.rf- ------ _ ....*-.• --F --- T7-•-•-...---4.-_, -. P.;.• -••••••-.... .-.-. :e'e=•.':••=• ...... '''.;,-.. ,. • Ve .= .'.' ,1.. ..4.t..ti.,............... .\., F.1 .17.. •',,,...: -.' :. ..: ...... :...••• •• •4.,.,•,... ... r•7,.. .....' ..t. •-.!...=2=•-_:.._„.._____1_ -----—----7-_-_::...•;.- ty„,4",---.- - ,- e-A...-•-",, _-_ -.:-----•----- -----• -.'-'''..---=1-•.,--:•:z..--,--,:•,-_,,-,,----'---.01444.A1' - e --, _____-.Te4.1------...,e..1 •-- - M-4.C., ..,- __ ,_______ ---,.,---7,— ,::.: j•-•,....- *•• Z..= -- -------". --- • , — -- - .— ..4...4-"::.-".",17_•.-.:4.:-_--___-=.-,_-,-5 4-,4-/,--•45,4a•;•-"-:-.1..i-..-..--..-4.-..--.--.".--.,..:---,--•---="-'?-;*--.,.-..-:..-=. _------;I,7.--1•. 4,-.-., • : ••44...1 =_ — - 1..4 2.a VICINITY MAP - D-- _-_:.4 --rs—=:--7A7-11T-F,,A.___ Wt....WM .ff.,........IN* • -_______. i,:•-... ...- ......- . .- _ -- ma••• yam.. el•1.• ----- - - ... - •. . --• -- -1t - 1..) . - . • .1:7%.YE.:.1:::1.7"r11".• '.:*,.7'7,1:7=........:... • - .. • ------ ,.... .....,sr•.4.......a••.•........• ,......, - - — --4.'4.W-:,- M 4..ac••c•or•-•........4.a'....•s...ft...a...• .-.-- ._ . _— —_-----.-.-.- .....-. _ ._. --,_. ..••t.•*•....•...•Lg....a, ,..- • - • •----- _ . - _ --t--,-- ------.----•,_--- -•''.==-. --__ - ' ,r..Le TIIIIITii: •C•13 CCC•EF C O N CE P T PLAN FOR S U P / E QUESTRIAN USE '- ;;- --'t= = EXISTING ZONING AG: __ - s . WC 1.•.. --.---,.._...7.....,7.. -----.,•-• ARE A 9 73 cc A 2.1.815 --- BUILDING COVERAGE 8.5 % 34.0,3 so 11---- ----. 1,4... .._.._....... _____ ._.___..,. -. _ :_.._:,A,-. \ -- -• --- . ......•ENtSTIND •ZDE35 CLSCoth, 11 9"59291.fl9E2 992 VE,5 •••492 14“..5 . 3/933 C 4.‘115 2/992'9.999'.9. .2992 LOPP• .6.. ... ... .. "... 2.1.0 AS CONCEPT PLAN Agh, ,.......... SHOW TIME FARMS, INC/APPLICANT - . PLAN- "' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS - SCALE •-•••• NORTH - CURRENT BUSINESS ADDRESS. C•611,C3 II L eTT 9 E. •RCWITEC T , _ .. litt9/1992 • l2.41 522.9999..riarfittrr•n• DAYLE BINDER • PAUL HAUNERT _ . 411 PECOS TRAIL • • IRVING, TEXAS 75063 • . . . .- - • -- . (214) 869-4066 . . . ... ... ___ . . • _. . . . . • - • . . _ • • _ . - _ (---) RESOLUTION NO. 93-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR EQUESTRIAN,' <;:USE:' <_<<;.:;OR ;:H. O;::.::,,<:....:;:. <'ROB IN QN' > : :'U E" ''>> »: ":':::>::>::<I I»;<"<M >: '< tWomomo »—ARU::::>:::<:>MORT:.;:;:.;;::PUT�.L`Y: .;:AN ::. . ;: .;.: tITLY ............................... .............................. ...................... ...... DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ; CURRENT ZONING IS . "AG" AGRICULTURAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE . • • WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for Equestrian uses has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45 . 1 (18) of the City' s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for Equestrian uses on the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit : 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 0Ge- -� -'1, 0 Resolution No. 93-06 Page 2 SECTION 2 This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council . PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF , 1993 . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas • 93-06.SUP/ORD/kb f. City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 25, 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 92-71 Plat Showing / Showtime Farms, Inc. REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Showing for Lot 1, A. Robinson No. 1131 Addition, being 9.615 acres out of the A. Robinson Survey, Abstract No. 1131, Tract 9. LOCATION: West side of North White Chapel Boulevard, North of Bob Jones Road. OWNER: Mildred M. Moore APPLICANT: Dayle Binder d\b\a Showtime Farms, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twelve (12) RESPONSES: None P & Z ACTION: January 7, 1993; Approved (7-0) subject to the Plat Review Summary dated December 31, 1992, deleting item #8. December 31, 1992 Plat Review Summary "8. Staff recommends a 'R.O.W. Reservation' of approximately 20' in width be provided along the South property line. This would then be combined with the apparent 30' wide tract to the South for a 50' R.O.W. to access the Roundtree tract (to the West) . The reservation would be a part of this lot and would have to be acquired b Roundtree developer or the City prior to use as R.O.W." P & Z Recommendation (delete item #8) STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the Second Plat Review Summary dated January 14, 1993. KPG g5` t 6 TA ♦.1A9 AC 2 5 — — — — — — — — _ TT: 5.158 AC ' / 11 / I TR 6 i 3 AC 3 7 King, J "AG" Brooks, B TR 7 3 AC. r_'_, 1 Weston, E "AG" •TR 8 ,B S4 Arlington State Bank 3 AC ] 2 d AG g_1A.. qss TR 1] 4... 9'r0c ]8.658 AC Cboper, R P I 5 Meals, " F-lA • . 11 9.73 AC 6 TR 9 VIO' ,Fernand:�. \\, .5 AC i / . L AK II, 23:g0 TR 10 f 33 I I \GorrAfRR g a / 4 I I 2 AC w Rolocsob, L jMeals, J Evans, J Grigsby, Sf ]A 1I "AG AG" 'AG ~, 10 te L 8 I O 3 tcsp Z Q Q C1�'TR ` ii2 9 6 TR 5a-982 ACC SAC TR 4A 1A 3 TA 2 I 6 AC 12 AC 10.5 AC 12 1 10 11_ I ,:.‘ ii,...-n ! .. ADJACENT OWNERS & ZONING . 18-3 City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY CASE NO: ZA 92-71 REVIEW NO: TWO DATE OF REVIEW: 1/14/93 PROJECT NAME : Plat Showing - Lot 1, A. Robinson No. 1131 Addition OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: Dayle Binder Thomas Thompson 411 Pecos Trail 1400 W. Euless Blvd. Irving, Texas 75063 Suite 102 Euless, Texas 76040 Phone: (214) 869-0600 Phone: (817 ) 267-9269 Fax: Fax: ( 817) 571-7959 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1/11/93 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT GREG LAST AT (817 ) 481-5581, EXT. 744 . * The applicant has apparently met all the requirements of our previous review. * Although the existing 'AG' zoning requires a minimum 10 acre lot, the existing non-conforming status of this lot will allow the requested platting to be approved. * The Developer' s Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage and park dedication requirements . * Original signatures will be required on both blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner' s dedications and notaries with original signatures on 8 .5" x 11" or 14" paper. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Dayle Binder Thomas Thompson kb-Li t, ��t Tin nen CP TOW. CUM or TVAYR to w r .at Lana ter n• m1 p.ao n..w folios.ead emereel.tear 111.Paw Y , W INO.n .1.0 cn �tl Marts P.neon per ear a I,Iri r SAM A tract as w m. ,.nic..6 a ...t Ian r r Co.. an �11 14•er• tstry r �. ; D -•A, 11I.11 fat ! Ion rW n ...not moat of lot 1. I y . T..dim. .�pt.t,at to e aPer S of II I.w Coda Cony Plat • ITIMES t 0.lr Pr a •lo.w Mat Una of alt Pelt*Drill art r—— . Pars o!Y,.1,lets u w a1.Ire rttl, I 1 a •Mo W W r ..Nr.�a r ri,.l.1•.t M w W.Iron N, 1 e 0a ow Oa•[ tan.r 1AI.M fat to-Urn rr1 ett I l 3.0 on I at um sou.wt cone.of rle 1.0 Qa Y vicinityT3 REIJCENEec.. o' er r..e •el.tr41 r 1at.1(Pale old of P On.In Vol.•,].Pg. 12S I T0.1040b 1.PIt ter...a 111.111 awn tots r tee. nprm�q. 1 Id.TNnooa Oa w.PIM P.leal,.matt P.O.B. �.I.mono rm. lm w pelf eater co w I"a"et to.Plat /� EAST- ]6].90• .4�� I de I. .I. .d. am V.vle.a errien toe Y aw•P. !•Drainage.lni14 Easement f I ref 1 Po Mq ecoa w Pall•:'ra w newts.Tanya,penal ev.rtr•••w•eon erase. ._.� • trt+tu er rw t .,.a..m.RY.T.....w. IS.1tw_r1 r .I1,].' i�1.( cnM antI. �• ] r%DOt•6• b0°t R•un'•d•ra1grrE eadrltr•a to.fay Prtwllr.{t—rrSn I IAIfCw000 RIDGE ADDRIOIt m so.m�..ra tYaw�n wea.wwr Mean.nbl.fVr to w.rt"'. . F Rs.N Vol 14 N.3 w r.tor tale Peat aslMntla ed..f erl In i PAD.C.I. „s I U.apealtr e..ln na.f. ,tee a 1 D i I CTVa Vete R 11V0 NO BN.Ce CR. W w—Pat r PAWL A ROUNOTREE a. I-f00' Rea.In Vol. 10225.Pa.0]] Y• G ; D.R.O.C.T. 5 p I. .It6]. .' Chtzb z a \PEST] 8 I o ODit .,te,]�f a 1 I 0.550 ne RONYLD d.COOPER Oro p P.C. R,.]NIECN]t]I 1 I3 rInVol. I10. 160 0-n..: 11110re6 Moor. I Wnft•Chop.Par! SONtnI•..Tema* IIr_Z a T V Oro....a Utah Eo..m.nl --vv. 4-61.61•.k.— a e0peaa HAW,rttat It ESP KY OOa VI ]6].1.' ,,r• •, ---"\ I f reins,tea Tn] l..aa ]506] I 11111 ((il• 66a-A066 Nm (21t 661-0600 art (.0 00ea.In VO4 1216. nIg.6.0 $I 'O.EVANS [r�• • Rn,ti eL]]•0,It.].. R.a6 r.6W.PG.N. 10.503.a [I.AYES L.WATTSiet alRea.InVol.11a1.M. Ea I f I PLAT SHOWING LOT 1 A. ROBINSON No. 1131 ADDITION AN ADptaN TO THE CITY or SOUTNLARE.DENTON COUNTY.TERAS 6EIND A 9.61 CC TRACT AI INC A.R06145061 SURVEY.A-1131 CITY COUNCIL SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS T/P plot M%.V>in Cotinet__. Shia._.. Doh, • AP.RPIY DArr wr0R PLANNING6LCArrmr AND ZONING II".Y."�";a'- """..need �i' ;'r'e". "A 'w�^^ SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS `l 101-r"'"" =Invent"fir a. i o.I.I....,tn."L Haws L.rw.rsort.a Ry,.tar THOmAS L. THOMPSON sears..a w to.•,n. APPRwu DATE 1.....•...i we..... ..item.. en aatw.. e,aea„°° «Naww•:'•e• tee emu. C,teleuw .etla•r nr'aiw• salad.:• a Y ta0 e'[J•.,Fn... epee. t•.•act:o b a. rte...pea C.f• o= ten err wau.....w.e..w°I.•.f.we., ')� [wY.T. 11Da SLCRpARr (I V)711-Nte e..•LR lnwneape i.. (611)]11-1tN N. r.4. a0•Nnl21 ��NW OCT Jon II, 1992 `nIJ City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER February 25, 1993 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FICKES AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Confirming and Adopting an Official Boundary Map In talking with City Attorney, Wayne Olson, and'Eddie Cheatham City Engineer, we feel there is a need to have approved an ordinance confirming and adopting an official boundary map of the City of Southlake. The purpose of this ordinance is to conclusively confirm the official boundaries in order to avoid any potential future legal challenge. As Wayne pointed out, Section 43 . 901 of the Local Government Code provides that this ordinance will be conclusively presumed to have been adopted with the consent of all appropriate persons after the expiration of two (2) years. Wayne still recommends seeking legislation to confirm the boundaries. He indicated that Allen Taylor and he will work on this. If you have any questions, please contact Wayne Olson, Eddie Cheatham or myself. ZliAt /sl • ORDINANC AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING AND ADOPTING THE OFFICIAL BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE; PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF THE OFFICIAL BOUNDARY MAP; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southla e, Texas is a home rule city act' • :- arter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has heretofore requested the City Engineer to determine the official boundaries of the city limits of the City of Southlake; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt this ordinance confirming and adopting the boundaries and map attached hereto as the official boundaries of the city limits of the City of Southlake, Texas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 That the map and boundaries attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby declared to be the official city limit boundaries of the City of Southlake, Texas, as of the effective date of this ordinance. The official boundary map of the City of Southlake shall be updated periodically at such time as additional annexations or other changes and boundaries are officially adopted by the City of Southlake. sl-II\boundary.ord(021893) Page 1 SECTION 2 The City Secretary is directed to maintain a copy of said map and boundary description, as amended from time to time, as a part of the official records of the City of Southlake, Texas. SECTION 3 The adoption of this ordinance shall not affect any ordinance, act or proceeding heretofore made applicable to any territory or land treated as being within the City of Southlake at the time said ordinance, act or proceeding was effective, notwithstanding the fact that such land or territory may not be included within the official boundaries of the City of Southlake as adopted herein. SECTION 4 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 5 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase,, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. sl-II\boundary.ord(021893) Page 2 re.-3 SECTION 6 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage provided by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1993. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1993. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: s1-II\boundary.ord(021893) Page 3 - - • Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 Cd.avS ale / _K TO Cam..=x �U� C.vLi/-"7�Jo'' )/!/jo-Oc Int rf Fai= 21e>xne= Fat' /r2•rid%L' Telephrn ... ��'/W3n i/er/ ssCP/ a/e2 9665 633/a�3 apt a5� [Destui 11PoettS. ❑c • Revised 2/93 CITY OF SOQTELAKE • Field notes describing the metes and bounds of the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. BEGINNING at a point in the North R_O.W. line of St. Louis and Southwestern R.R_, the same being the Northeast corner of a tract of land conveyed by Robert Eugene Titbits and wife, Helen Elizabeth Titbits to William R. McKee by deed dated 8/31/53, filed for record 9/12/53 in Volume 2612, Page 307, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, the same point also being the most southerly southeast corner of a tract of lend conveyed by William R. McKee to Matalee S. Webster by deed dated 12/16/60, filed for record in Volume 3738, Page 157, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE Southwesterly along the northwest R.O.W. line of St. Louis and Southwestern R.R. to a point for a corner in the centerline of Big Bear Creek, said point being in the common City limits line with the City of Colleyville; THENCE Northwesterly up stream with the meanders of Big Bear Creek to a point for a corner in the centerline of a ravine in the Heirs of the J.H. Gibson Survey, AbsLiact No. 591; THENCE Northerly up the ravine to a point for a corner in its centerline, said point being an easterly extension of the North line of the W.M. Davenport Survey, Abstract No. 432 and being in the south line of a tract of land annexed' into the City of Southlake by Ordinance 188; THENCE Westerly along the south line of said Ordinance No. 88 and continuing along the south line of Ordinance r199 an approximate distance of 2,000 feet to a point for a corner in the north line of said Davenport Survey, said point being the most southerly northeast corner of a tract of land annexed into Southlake by Ordinance No. 374 and being in the centerline of a draw known as the Daley Branch; THENCE Southerly along the centerline of Daley Branch to a point for a corner at its intersection with the centerline of Big Bear Creek; THENCE Westerly with the meanderings of Big Bear Creek and the south line of Ordinance No. 's 374, 291, 151, 375, 104, 76, 15, and 219, passing the east line of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1037, the east line of the Hall Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1038, the east line of the Wm. E. Crooks Survey, Abstract No. 295, the east line of the M. M. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 533, to a point in the centerline of Big Bear Creek and the east line of the Samuel Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 1504, said point being at the intersection of Keller, ,Colleyville and Southlake City limits, and being the place of beginning of Southlake Ordinance No. 187, being a release of territorial jurisdiction to the City of Keller; THENCE continuing westerly with the meanderings of Big Bear Creek following to its centerline to a point for a corner where said centerline of Big Bear Creek intersects with the centerline of the Jellico Branch; TES Northwesterly with the centerline of Jellico branch and crossing Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938) to a point for a corner at its intersection with the south R.O.W. of Union Church Road (Co. Rd. #3099) ; THENCE westerly along the south right-of-way line of Union Church Road to the intersection of the south right-of-way line of Union Church Road with the west right-of-way line of Pearson Lane (Co. Rd. #4041) ; THENCE Northerly along the west right-of-way line of Pearson Lane to the point where such right-of-way line intersects with the north right-of-way line of Florence Road (Co. Rd. #4088) ; THENCE Easterly along the north right-of-way line of Florence Road east to the point where said north right-of-way line of Florence Road intersects with the west right-of-way line of Randol Mill Ave. (Co. Rd. #3035) ; THENCE Northerly along the west R.O.W. of Randol Mill Ave. to a point intersecting the west boundary line of the W. Winn Survey, Abstract No. 1660; THENCE continuing in a northerly direction along the west line of the W. Winn Survey passing its northwest corner and then approximately 1,114 feet along the west line of the W.N. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1068 to a point for a corner, said point being in the common city limit line of Southlake and the City of Westlake and being further described as the southwest corner of the E. H. Reeder_ 103.69 acre tract. (Field notes of Westlake, Texas Corporate limits, June 16, 1974.) ; 2 THENCE Easterly along the south line of said Reeder Tract approximately 2,075 feet to a point for a corner in the west R.O.W. of Randol Mill Ave. (Co. Rd. 3035) ; THENCE Northerly along the west R.O.W. of Randol Mill Ave. to a point for a corner in its intersection with the south line of the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510; THENCE East along the south line of said Throop Survey to a point for a corner by deed call 472.91 feet west of the southeast corner of said C. Throop Survey, said point being the most southerly southeast corner of a tract of land as recorded in Vol. 4113, P. 373, DPTCT; THENCE N 01° 51' 30" W along the most westerly east line of said tract 922.67 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE S 89° 30' 31" E 472.5 feet to a point for a corner, said _ point being in the west line of the T. Mann Survey A-1107; THENCE in a northerly direction along the west line of said T. Mann Survey to a point for a corner, said- point being by deed call 1739.7 feet north of the southwest corner of the T. Mann Survey and being the northwest corner of a tract of land recorded in Vol. 5092, P. 627, DRTCT; THENCE N 79 ° 01' E 213.75 feet along the north line of said tract to a galvanized iron pipe by a corner of the fence in the west line of County Road #3088 (Sam School Road) ; THENCE in a southeasterly direction crossing County Road #3088 (Sam School Road) to a point for a corner, said point being the southwest corner of Lot 7 and the northwest corner of Lot 6 of the R.P. Estes Subdivision as recorded in Vol. 1957, P. 324, DRTCT; THENCE easterly along the common south line of Lot 7 and north line of Lot 6 by deed a distance of 1,349 feet to a point for a corner in the east line of the T. Mann Survey; THENCE in a northerly direction along the east line of the T. Mann Survey and the west line of J. Martin Survey A-1134 to a point for a corner, said point being by deed South 910.51 feet from the northwest corner of the J. Martin Survey and being the southwest corner of the tract of land annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance #319 (Tract II) ; THENCE N 89 ° 27' 49" E to a point for a corner in the northeasterly R.O.W. of State Highway 114; 3 �SC' 7 THENCE northwesterly along the northeasterly R.O.W. of S.H. 114 to a point for a corner at its intersection with the west R.O.W. line of T.W. King Road (Co. Rd. #3088) ; THENCE Northerly along the west R.O.W. of T.W. King Road to a point in its intersection with the west line of the W. Mills Survey, Denton County Abstract No. 877; THENCE continuing northerly along the west line of said Mills Survey to a point in the re-entrant west R.O.W. line of T.W. King - Rd.; THENCE continuing northerly along the west R.O.W. line of T.W. King Road, passing the south line of the M. Medlin Survey, Denton County Abstract No. 832, continuing along the west R.O.W. to a point due west of the northwest corner of the I. Belcher Survey, Denton County Abstract No. 30; THENCE Easterly crossing T.W. King Road and continuing along the north line of the I. Belcher Survey, to its northeast corner; THENCE Southeasterly to a point in the north line of the Hardy A. Throop Survey, Denton County Abstract No. 1273, said point being the S.E. corner of the William Phillips Survey, Denton County Abstract No. 1017 and S.W. corner of the N.S. Hazleton Survey, Denton County Abstract No. 546; THENCE Southerly to a point for the most westerly northwest corner of the J. Wizwell Survey, Denton County Abstract No. 1348; THENCE South along the west line said Wizwell Survey to its S.W. corner, said corner being in the north line of the John Wizwell Survey, Denton County Abstract No. 1347; THENCE Southeasterly to a point for a corner, said point being the northeast corner of the John Childress Survey, Abstract No. 254, the southeast corner of the J. Wizwell Survey A-1347 (Denton Co.) and being in the east line of the F. Harris Survey A-536 (Denton Co.) ; ,. THENCE Southerly along the •east line of said Childress Survey to a point for a corner, said point being the southeast corner of the Freda and Joe Kennel Tract as recorded in Vol. 4251, Pg. 165, DRTCT, and the southeast corner of a tract annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance No. 143; THENCE Westerly to a point for a corner, said point being in the west line of the L. Lincoln Survey, Abstract No. 981, and being a westerly projection of the south line of tract of land deeded to Carl and Mary Rickett as recorded in Vol. 4177, Pg. 181, DRTCT; 4 THENCE Southerly along mid west survey line to a point for a corner, said point being in the north line of a 0.37 acre tract of land deeded to Freddie and Glenda Cate as recorded in Vol. 4173, Pg. 9, DRTCT; THENCE Easterly to the northeast corner of said Cate Tract; THENCE South 95 feet to the southeast corner of said Cate Tract; THENCE Westerly along the south line of said Cate Tract to a point for a corner in its intersection with said west survey line of the L. Lincoln Survey; THENCE Southerly along said west survey line of the L. Lincoln Survey to a point for a corner at its intersection with the north line of a tract of land deeded to Luis and Jean Monroe as recorded in Vol. 3975, Pg. 93, DRTCT; THENCE Easterly along the north line of said Monroe tract to its northeast corner; THENCE Southerly along the east line of the said Monroe tract to its southeast corner; THENCE Westerly along said Monroe Tract south line to a point for a corner at its intersection with the west line of the L. Lincoln Survey; THENCE Southerly along said west line of the L. Lincoln Survey to a point for a corner in its intersection with the north line of a • tract'of land deeded to Robert and Shirley Norman as recorded in Vol. 4258, Pg. 165, DRTCT; THENCE Easterly to the northeast corner of said tract; THENCE Southerly to the southeast corner of said tract; THENCE Westerly along said tract south line to a point for a corner in the west line of the L. Lincoln Survey, Abstract No. 981; THENCE Southerly along the west line of the Lincoln Survey, Abstract No. 981 to a point for a corner, said point being in the north line of F. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511; THENCE Easterly along the north line of said Throop Survey to a point for a corner, said point being in the west line of a tract of land deeded to Jimmy Messina as recorded in Vol. 3830, Pg. 381, DRTCT, and being that same tract of land annexed into the City of Southlake by Ordinance No. 141; • THENCE N O1°02'00" West to a iron pin for a corner, and being the northwest corner of said tract; THENCE N 85°12'00" East 213.17 feet to a USA road easement cement marker (USA Rd. #4) for a corner; THENCE S 32°40'00" East 325.62 feet (along USA Rd.. #4) to a USA road easement cement marker for a corner, said marker being the R.O.W. intersection of Kimball Rd. (Co. Rd. #3119) and USA Rd. #4; THENCE N 89° 13° 00" West passing at 383.65 feet the southwest corner of said tract, and continuing to a point for a corner, . said point being in the east line of the F. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511 and also being the northwest corner of the F. Wood Survey, Abstract No. 1688; THENCE Southerly along the west line of said Wood Survey also being the centerline of North Kimball Ave. (Co. Rd. #3119) to a point for a corner, said corner being the southwest corner of said Wood Survey and also being the northwest corner of the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525; THENCE Easterly along the North line of said Freeman to its northeast corner, and being the most southerly southeast corner of the John Whitman Survey, Abstract No. 1593; THENCE due east to a point for a corner in the centerline of Jones Branch; THENCE Southerly with the meanderings of the centerline of said Jones Branch to a point for a corner in the north line of a tract of land deeded to Feeney and Frances Fry as recorded in Vol. 2283, Pg. 592, DRTCT; THENCE Westerly along the north line of said Fry Tract to its northwest corner; THENCE Southerly with the west line of said Fry Tract to a point for a corner, said point being in the south line of a tract of land deeded to Feeney and Frances Fry as recorded in Vol. 2283, Pg. 592, DRTCT; THENCE Easterly along the south line of said Fry tract to a point for a corner in the centerline of the Jones Branch; THENCE Southerly along with the meanderings of the centerline of Jones Branch to.a point for a corner, said point being approximately 300 feet north of State Highway 114 as it stood September 25, 1956; 6 SC,-/a THENCE Southeasterly parallel with and approximately 300 feet north of State Highway 114 as it stood September 25, 1956 to a point for a corner, said point being in the west curb line of Park Boulevard; THENCE Southerly with the west curb . line of Park Blvd. and its extension to its intersection with a 5 foot offset line 5 feet north of the south curb line of the south paved roadway of the section of State Highway 114 as it existed January, 1971 and known as "Business 114" to a point for a corner; THENCE Westerly along the 5 foot offset of the south curb line of said "Business 114" to a point for a corner, said point being the beginning of a 5 foot offset along a curve to the left of the R.O.W. of said "Business 114"; THENCE along a 5 foot offset of said curve to the left to a point for a corner in the intersection of the 5 foot R.O.W. offset of _ S.H. 114 Business and a 5 foot offset of the west R.O.W. of the most easterly access road to State Highway 114; THENCE Southerly along the 5 foot offset of the west R.O.W. of the most easterly access road to State Highway 114 crossing the east line of the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474 and continuing approximately 600 feet from the east line of said Easter Survey to a point for a corner, said point being a projection of the north line of a tract of land platted as Grapevine Industrial Park, an addition to the City of Grapevine; THENCE Westerly with said projected line crossing a portion of the R.O.W. of State Highway 114 and along the north line of said Grapevine Industrial Park to its northwest corner; THENCE Southerly with the west line of said Grapevine Industrial Park and the east line of Southlake Bank Place as recorded in Vol. 388-177, Pg. 14, PRTCT, to a point for a corner, being the most southerly southeast corner of said Southlake Bank Place; THENCE Westerly along the south line of said Southlake Bank Place passing its southwest corner and continuing along the south line of Commerce Business Park as recorded in Vol. 388-214, Pg. 60, PRTCT passing its southwest corner, and continuing along the south line of a 33.3 Acre tract of land as recorded in Vol. 3934, Pg. 184, DRTCT, and the north line of a Webster Tract recorded in Vol. 3738, Pg. 157 to a point for a corner being the northeast corner of the C.B. McDonald Survey, Abstract No. 1013; THENCE Southerly along the east line of said McDonald Survey a distance of 1,500 feet more or less to a point for a corner, said point being the most southerly southeast corner of said tract of land by deed to Matalle Webster, Vol. 3738, Pg. 157, DRTCT; 7 THENCE Easterly along the south line of said Webster Tract 1,506 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. • • • • • 8 • • ��- !Z-- City of Southlake, Texas CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM LA ,9cg3 /( February 25 , 1993 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Resolution 93-18, Appointment of Members to a Capital Improvements Committee in Regard to Impact Fees Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395, sets forth the requirements for adopting impact fees . Southlake adopted water and wastewater impact fees in 1990 . The law requires an update to the impact fee ordinance be completed within three years of initial adoption. The City Council must appoint members to an advisory committee of not less than five persons . Not less than 40% of the membership of the advisory committee must be representatives of the real estate, development, or building industries who are not employees or officials of a political subdivision or governmental entity. The Advisory Committee serves in an advisory capacity and is established to advise and assist the City in adopting land use assumptions, review the capital improvements plan and file written comments, monitor and evaluate implementation of the capital improvements plan, file reports as to the progress of the capital improvements plan, and advise the City of the need to update or revise the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, and impact fees . In 1990, the City appointed six members and one alternate to the Advisory Committee. Two of those members are currently serving on the City Council . The Council must determine the members that will serve on this committee for the update and adopt Resolution 93-18 . ga.u.AA\AL. L(eeat LAH 1 City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION 93-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS APPOINTING MEMBERS TO A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Whereas, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas formed a Capital Improvements Committee to work with the City staff in developing and implementing land use perimeters for water and sewer impact fees; and, Whereas, it has been established that the committee is to consist of at least five (5) members, with two (2) of the members being developers; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2 . That the City Council desires to appoint the following members to serve on the Capital Improvements Committee: 1 . Joe Wright 5. 2 . Lanny Tate 6 . 3 . David McMahan 7. 4 . 8. Section 3 . That his resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council . PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary t FEB9 1993 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE- OFFICE OF '' jj CITY ;S.ECRETARy�),.J APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board, commission, or//////'''"' committee) : urel7`/4 2 �/LI�'/ v�/�l�/✓�'� g/7 '°)c' 4)- Agx1/1-e_ a separate/application for each appointment' desired) Name: F��% ife`er/�J�T/ • Address: 2 yC/ s /t/ 4 / // /,>,7 Home Phone: ffi' r 7,[D / Years in City: ?Y44f- Employer: �f/i, fr' Ci,//r/ 7 ,/, Phone: y - '277 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: 77,i21 ,PO44) //u " 4r�s.4i,&4/ 6- Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee , and your opinion as to the purpose , goals , and duties of same: .79 P/, / 1 f1./?s'�� 76;vAi /,� /7 � Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: IZ,oi�/�e �/'GJ�li.�C� 'A ✓O/,�/�ii-lair/` , , 44,7 3.4 /l-'r J7/ y� .�/G��'��U>eN7 lilt' - ' • Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee , and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? Additional information or comments: Please return this completed form to the City Secretary' s Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. ; After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. • Signature: ) ��`/�� Date : ✓'-/ -)/✓ ii� �� - 3 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ))) APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board , commission, or committee) : (7e-A/ 2/1 L }/�/::7J C �in� ,55/c f.1 C �c%• r-r / F (use a separate application for each appointment desired) Name: Sf},'YJES " eD8C-/er " /-/uDSO,J Address: Oct ( C.r, cR.R-c_L) C(2 SOUT)1LA Ice / Tx 7( 09 2— Home Phone: 6,17) Lin -7,,Ly6 Years in City: Employer: LITrLCTaN CLAI m s Phone: en)tf3Y-S.S77 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: NON L Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee , and your opinion as to the purpose ,JJ��// goals , and duties of same: j�ra n�B 7l1 IiP�G am, ./i iu-Pd �- t0 fh.irr 4 1 o r,: 8• / .�, f Ge .Uwrro ..1d .4-,(0-70-6?) p�.� cr;r r`-1u Cu ,C 4 _1/1i-q` .46 r tn. ra . l.�c ' .-n ce,44f a /'zr c.,/0.44. Qualificaons and" exp erien that would assist you in serving in this position: ,/ ,a1-,,7 64 frn e c o�j Q .Qc�G- . QGObGv �,.9 p4C ��Gu r rJGfrt-ill. v' 2b,c aa-d • rfa Atl , lArryZela-,•�� Li,rn 1�� c�-� - / Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? y6s Additional information or comments: / 4 ,- /&'2t Q—c/ Please return this completed form to the City Secretary' s Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information herein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature : 4' Date : /- 93 cr . !'11 ti (41 FE.1315 1993 OFFEICaEOT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CITY FARYVi APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board, commission, or committee) : / - . - • .. e ,1,-- • i• , , /• • v:4:- ' / k ••=' \• t. , r /(use a separarte application for each appointment desired) / / • Name: jj r ../ Address: (1,/: ,/: -‹ Home Phone: K./ — 6.c) ?(,) Years in Employer: -"ci(- Phone: Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals , and duties of same: , (z- . -r- 4 r. ;21 7 • • Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in - this position: (.,- :_•,. / , -; I ) / /. „ • • Do you understand and agree that your regular .attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? i -- , Additional information or comments: Please return this completed form to the City Secretary' s Office. - Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information h4rein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature : Date : 7/ ) r :1 0-i; ; `I'i Bl L % 1923 . .. i CITY OF SOUTHLAKE OFFICE OF CITY SEC_RETAB.Y�p APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (name of board , commission, 'or committee) : - ie,W;,(' v4t / /V- Z-,a "--e,.(_) a-7-#4-t--,e --e__,e. (us a separate p� pcation for each aintment desired) Name: 762/11/Wei1- • ✓8,1z-/ti/5 Address: 332- C ,ClLW(902). CT cR vi/Ne1 /� .7 / Home Phone: eiG - 3070 Years in City: -r/'2 . Employer:7/1257• , -red r64ti .5411/4/A, S Phone: s`0 - /%03 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee , experience in the City of Southlake: it/oiv'� 1 Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, comi xrssion, or committee , and your o inion as to the purpose,� goals , and duties of same: i' ... a.n c A G G :,. /1--�< 1-4. l7'(i /d � 924,- a 01 fr�dAgo? C /YYiI -017 iyyi /� G��G1 , M-1 a)4 Cam, ' h, kifr//.11 i2tiZ %G .e / assist you n servingin Qualific tuns and ex�rience that would a__ ist _ u i , this position: tom- 4 ,e- , ,�I..- sue, f&_ , Aw/-4a.,--c_ A0/-1-1-A4,:, ,- .- ,20p4f--(-,7 , ,._,,,_ /7/,,- .11-ps.) \frui4e .--,-74 -104,---,1_ . ' :v--7,- --7‘:._ '‘,,--/ /,‘,4,- -; . _ 5./A,P- 77-1_ rit0e- r:e. ; --/-.-c;- Lerc,-i,- ,e4e.- wA-z.'42rP--e. Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointe and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? /i - Additional information or comments: 3 \' 4-/- /17 :4„,..... a� yZz G� _ . 1 Please return this completed form to the City Secretary' s Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. After that time it will be necessary to reapply and update the information hezrein if you wish to continue to be considered for appointment. Signature : r lt�Ly �� . Date = —� —7.) APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE RELATED TO IMPACT FEES The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, is currently accepting applications for positions on the Capital Improvements Committee Related to Impact Fees. The Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395, sets forth the requirements for adopting impact fees. Southlake adopted water and wastewater impact fees in 1990 . The law requires an update to the impact fee ordinance be completed within three (3) years of initial adoption. The City Council must appoint members to an advisory committee of not less than five (5) persons. Not less than 40% of the membership of the advisory committee must be representatives of the real estate, development, or building industries who are not employees or officials of a political subdivision or governmental entity. The Advisory Committee serves in an advisory capacity and is established to advise and assist the City in adopting land use assumptions, review the capital improvements plan and file written comments, monitor and evaluate implementation of the capital improvements plan, file reports as to the progress of the capital improvements plan, and advise the city of the need to update or revise the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, and impact fee. Applications are available in the Office of City Secretary, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092 , and must be received by February 24 , 1993 by the City Secretary. For further information, please contact Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary 481- 5581 extension 704 . City of Southlake,Texas CITY MANAGEtly • MEMORANDUM I o/e_q?, February 25, 1993 `� TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: MONTICELLO, PHASE II, DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT Attached is the Developer' s Agreement for Monticello, Phase II . This agreement is very similar to the Developer' s Agreement for Phase I . The Agreement contains the standard requirements for the provisions of water, sewer, streets and drainage. The standard maintenance bonds, inspection fees and park fees are included. However, there are several conditions which are unique to this development which result in revisions to our standard agreement. Below is a list of those conditions . A. No building permits will be requested prior to final completion and acceptance of the water, sewer, streets and drainage. Partial release of a percentage of lots after the water lines are installed is not requested by the Developer as has been customary with other developments. (Pg. 1, B). B. In connection with item A above, Performance Bond, Letter of Credit or Payment Bond is not required since there will be no construction on the lots prior to final completion and acceptance of the infrastructure in the subdivision by the • City. Therefore, the standard references to these bonds were omitted from the Phase. I and Phase II agreements. Below are the extracted portions from the standard developer's agreement. "I. (C) The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100;0 of the value of the construction cost of all : of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the • completion of the subdivision if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this agreement between the ;City and Developer. All bonds should be approved by a Best- rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. /�.0-/ The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or, other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. I. (E) Until the performance and payment bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow required in C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the subdivision shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said subdivision'by the Developer, save and except as provided above. " I. (I) Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc. ) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. III. (F) Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such ;renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. " C. Sewer Pro Rata fees were required for Phase I . There are no Sewer Pro Rata Fees required for Phase II, however;, Sewer Impact Fees of $1, 000 per lot is required by the Builder and payable prior to building permit being issued. (Pg. 7, A) D. The Developer and City agree that a 12" water line is required by the City along Continental Blvd. The City' s policy is to pay the cost difference between a 12" water line and an 8" water line to the developer after the acceptance of the water line by the City. This was also the situation for Phase I of the Development . (Pg. 7, B) E. The Developer agrees this subdivision is required to dedicate park land or pay park land fees of $500/lot as required by the Subdivision Ordinance, which amounts to $11, 500 . The Developer has requested a 50% credit toward the park land fees for the amenities that will be installed in this phase (23 lots x $500 - 50% = $5, 750 . 00) . (Pg. 7, C) An application for the 50% credit is attached to the Developer' s Agreement for Council' s review. This was also the same as for Phase I . F. The Developer paid a Perimeter Street Fee for Phase I, II and III of the subdivision on April 8, 1991, in accordance with Section IV, Paragraph B, sub-paragraph 2 of Ordinance No. 494, therefore, no Perimeter Street Fee is due. (Pg 8, D) Please place this item on the Council' s March 2 agenda for their consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. ' V GL/lc Attachment : Monticello, Phase II Developer' s Agreement Application for Park Fee Credit MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION 2-25-93 it DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT DRAFT. An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, of the Monticello Subdivision to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the NA lots contained within the Monticello Subdivision (Phase ) and"to the off-site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. I . GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this agreement. B. The Developer agrees that no building permits will be required prior to the final completion and acceptance of the water, sewer, streets and drainage facilities by the City of Southlake . Any deviation from this agreement may result in a revision of the Developer' s Agreement by the City Council. C. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City of Southlake and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire agreement shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. To pay to the City three (3%) percent of the construction cost for inspection fees of the water, streets, drainage facilities, and sanitary sewer. It is agreed by both the City and the Developer that the City will pay the following testing fees and the Developer will be responsible to pay for all other testing fees required by the City not listed below: a) All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard) . Trench testing (95% Standard) shall be paid by the Developer; b) All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization; c) Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; d) Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. Charges for retesting as a result of failed tests will be paid by the Developer. Fees are payable prior to construction of each phase, based on actual bid construction costs. The Developer will be responsible to pay for all inspection fees when inspection is required on Saturday or Sunday. These fees are considered over K` and above the 3% inspection fee as stated above. Acceptance of the project will not be given until all inspection fees are paid. 2 . To delay _connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this contract until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. F. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses, hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintain the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this • service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer or Builder has notice of costs. 2 G. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer' s Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company' s authorization to do business in Texas . Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II . FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Monticello Subdivision in the City of Southlake. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer' s engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer' s request, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer' s engineers, approved by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council . C. STREETS: 1 . The street construction in the Monticello residential development of the City of Southlake shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217 . Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer' s engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2 . The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and one year operation of street lights; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to, be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance 3 / r - with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by an engineering study performed by the Director of Public Works. 3 . All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of Monticello Subdivision in the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer' s engineer and approved by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and . engineering. E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc. , to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer' s responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the 4 streets and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the streets. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and placed the soil within the subdivision at the contractor' s expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. F. AMENITIES: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Monticello Subdivision may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities . The Developer agrees to , accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The City shall be responsible only for the maintenance of those items within the public right-of-way and then only to the extent provided in other subdivisions within the city. G. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds submitted to the City if required by this agreement. 2 . At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Approved for Construction" . by the City Engineer. 3 . All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4 . Developer' s Agreement executed. • III . GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify, hold harmless and 5 /Dw- 8` defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities . B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City' s approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed -- construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any. and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer' s designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings bought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being. insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish ' the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall . also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. IV. OTHER ISSUES : A. SEWER PRO RATA: T hc—Developr agreco cr�'at there _o an exioting aeinxer lain. (C 4) that thio oubdivioion will tic to and that thc Developer will pay thcir pro rata oharc of the S 4 ocwcr lint ao required by thc Sewer Pro Rata Ordinance #493 . The pro rata fcc will. be payable prior to otart of construction. • ................::•::::.::..•.;..nrv:•v:v ..}iii:�i::{:;:}'}:i::iiii::i::i'}}j j::......;•.:....:......::::::::n}:::{fir:?•}}i:::}::�:. •::::::::: ... :. ........:.:r. .x..•.v::;•:. ...vr.v:w::.... .............. :.'[v.::$tii: :}:ti•.•:•;:•.}};....i••{:v::.}]7�ryJ ;.;::.::. .}}:.}v:: : ... r..r..:....{ iyAy� tif••:{{:.`�•., �.:. v.}::(: ��yY ,O i�1�1. (.!!��' +L;.; :::iy:7.:•:.i'•r•':.: :g :.i::::iia..':::i::; itt r. .:::r::�++•}::�:..t7[.ti:,. :ii:b'r' .•.: •:: �!^i$ '1:1>..: ff�!': .M+j:•..:::ti:::::iY:'�.{CFY..:::...: .... Y:. .:}:F("L.. ::n :3<5•:r .iFY::. ............�1•.Q.::..... ....... ........ ' �:::::::::.v ::. nv::x::v:::::::n::v:::::w:::w::;:}:v::::::::::�... w::.•r:::?xv.•r::x::::::::.v::::::::::::::::::::::::::•::::::.v:.�::::v:: }ip:•: }}Y}:•}:•}:ti4::v:•}}}}:;: .......v..................n....................rrrv::f.•:..nv.:........................................................... era: < l M 3 az: 5 ed `::: B. WATER LINES: The Developer and City agree that a 12" water line is required by the City along Continental Blvd. It is the City' s policy that the City will pay the cost difference between a 12" water line and an 8" water line to the developer, provided that the difference cost is reasonable in the industry. Payment will be made to the Developer after the acceptance of the water line by the City. C. PARK FEES : The Developer agrees that this subdivision is required to dedicate park land or park land fees as required by Article VII• of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 . Since this phase is less than 250 lots, the Developer will be required to pay $500 per lot (51 loto in Phaoc I) or $27, 000 park land fees for the rcoidcntial portion and $500 per acrco or $123 . 04 for the one (1) commercial lot (23 lots in Phase II) in lieu of park land dedication as required by the Ordinance. The Developer has requested and City Council has agreed to give a credit of 50% toward the park land fees for the amenities that will be installed in this phase. This will result in the payment of rsrb€O to the City to meet the Park Dedication requirement: 7 6L J!0 D. PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE: The Developer paid the Perimeter Street Fee for the entire Monticello Subdivision (Phase I, II and III) on April 8, 1991 in accordance with Section IV, Paragraph B, sub-paragraph 2 of Ordinance No. 494 . SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title : Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date : c:\wpfiles\devagree\MONTCELL.2 8 /a,--/ • REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit (L of C) must have a duration of at least one year. 2 . The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10, 000 . 00 . The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3 . The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit . 4 . The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6 0) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5 . The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6 . Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7 . The City must be able to draft on sight with proof ofamount owed. 8 . The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9 . Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. c:\wpfiles\devagree\MONTCELL.2 9 - • 2/23/93 APPLICATION FOR PARKLAND DEDICATION Type of Application: Preliminary Plat Final Plat * (*If Final conforms to preliminary, fill in #1 only) 1. Development Name: Monticello, Phase II 2 . Phase Total Acres Total Lots Phase II Total Acres 44.053 Total Lots 23 3 . Total Parkland Dedication Assessed*: $11,500 * Residential = $ 500 per Lot * Commercial = $ 500 per Acre 4. Proposed allocation to fulfill parkland dedication requirement: Land: Fees: $11,500 Improvements* $ *Describe any improvements: 5. Does this development propose private parkland/open space? Yes X No If Yes, please describe: Total Acres 35+, Playground; combi- nation playing fields for soccer, baseball and football; lakes; logging trails and 2 tennis courts. 1 Proposed Recreational Facilities: 6. If this development contains private parkland, open space or recreational facilities, are you requesting partial credit toward parkland dedication requirements? Yes X No 7. Is this development a Planned Unit Development? Yes X No _ 8. Please note any additional information you wish to supply the Park Board. Feel free to reference attached text or exhibits as necessary. The Developer is requesting a 50% credit toward the park land fees for amenities that will be installed in this phase. 9 . Contact Person: Terry Wilkinson Phone: 329-4599 Firm: Larry Cole Companies Fax: 388-2420 Address: 601 Vicksburg Court Southlake, Texas 76092 c:\wpfilea\memoa\parkland.app / / City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM ``,TYr�� i� February 25, 1993h TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Request by the City of Grapevine to Approve Extension • of Austin Oaks Drive from the City Limits Line to the Future State Highway 114 Right-of-Way in Southlake Attached is a letter from Grapevine City Manager Trent Petty to City Manager Curtis Hawk requesting the approval of an extension of Austin Oaks Drive. Also attached is a map submitted by Mr. Petty that indicates that proposed right-of-way dedication. I met with Public Works Director Jerry Hodge on Tuesday, February 23, 1993 . Mr. Hodge will be in attendance at our Council meeting on March 2nd to make the presentation for this extension. His purpose is to appear before the City of Southlake to provide information on the intentions of the City of Grapevine and Austin Oaks, Inc . , concerning their position on this extension. Upon approval, the developer will submit the final plat and design plans for roadway improvement and process an access permit with the Texas Department of Transportation. These design plans will meet or exceed the same design and specifications that we currently have in our City. The City of Grapevine will also . provide the inspection service for this construction. Right-of-way for a portion of these improvements has been dedicated to the City by separate instruments as recorded in V. 10023, P. 1655 DRTCT as shown on the attached exhibit. This dedication was not signed as accepted by the City of Southlake. Our attorneys have advised us that this dedication would be sufficient should the City direct the developer to build the road and then the City decided to accept the improvements . Until the City accepts these improvements, the right-of-way as dedicated is not owned by the City. The attached exhibit also shows the additional right-of-way to be dedicated to facilitate these improvements . Greg Last will be available at the meeting to answer any questions . - - /2V-(__ a t Memorandum - Curtis E . Hawk Request by the City of Grapevine to Approve Extension of Austin Oaks Drive from the City Limits Line to the future State Highway 114 Right-of-Way in Southlake February 25, 1993 Page 2 I am available for any questions or comments that you might have. BC/mr Attachments (2) wp\Memo\AustnOak.114 /D/(J . P Fa) @MET FEB 2 41993 OFFICE OF CITY A Future With A Past MANAGER Y Y GRAPEVINE February 24, 1993 Mr. Curtis Hawk, City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Connection of Austin Oaks Drive to State Highway 114 Dear Sir: On behalf of the City of Grapevine and, in particular, the citizens in the Austin Oaks Addition, I am requesting that the City of Southlake City Council consent to the extension of Austin Oaks Drive from the current south terminus in Grapevine to connect to State Highway 114 in Southlake along the alignment identified in the attached right-of-way dedication exhibit. We understand that this consent on the part of the City Council of Southlake would be conditioned upon the City of Grapevine and AustOak, Inc., meeting the following conditions: 1 . The developer shall submit a preliminary and final plat of the tract located in Southlake showing the proposed dedicated street right-of-way, or, prepare a street right-of-way dedication exhibit with legal description and submit by separate instrument. The right-of-way dedication will require extending to the current State Highway 114 right-of-way instead of the originally planned future north line of the State Highway 114 right-of-way. 2. The developer shall instruct the consultant engineer to complete the design plans for the roadway improvements and make them available to Southlake, Grapevine, and TxDOT for their review. These plans will include provisions for paving, drainage, and water improvements. 3. The consultant engineer shall revise the plans per each reviewer's comments and hold a meeting to resolve any possible design differences between the three reviewing entities. 4. The developer shall process an "Access Permit" with TxDOT, which will allow the connection of Austin Oaks Boulevard to State Highway 114. THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE P.O. Box 95104 • Grapevine, Texas 76099 • Phone Metro 817/481-0380 /61' i • • Mr. Curtis Hawk Page 2 February 24 , 1993 5. The developer shall hold a joint preconstruction meeting with Southlake, Grapevine, and TxDOT officials. 6. The developer shall construct all improvements and have them accepted by all parties. We have been contacted by numerous residents of the Austin Oaks Subdivision requesting that some action be taken to improve their subdivision's access via the planned future connection of Austin Oaks Boulevard to State Highway 114. In an effort to relieve any potential impact upon the City of Southlake, the City of Grapevine is willing to review all construction plans for this project, ensure that the plans have been developed in compliance with both state and Southlake requirements and perform the construction inspection upon the work if the City of Southlake agrees. This is a very important issue for this particular subdivision and for the City of Grapevine as a whole. It is important for the future viability of this subdivision that improved access be provided to this area. We appreciate any cooperation that you may provide to us. Sincerely, Trent Petty City Manager TP/JSL/jh cc: William D. Tate, Mayor City Council Jerry Hodge Kevin Kendrick file . D:\AusOkl14.Hwk [ e.... os O ® m © • 0 BLOCK 311 -- -- I d BONHAM TRAIL (501 R.O.W.) • SCALEII'm60' 1 IIN O I / e I —AUSTIN NANOfJ�1405 7 30 80 1 1 cow _.'.R.'i.C.i• 1 4 • gg BLOCK 2 1 r BLOCK 1 $ 8.09'24'E 288.54 City of GRAPY INE City of SOUTHLAKE , /140 , . ' g . ., Jv AUS 521.�PTIC•0.149 1�ec O _ TG RO.yy 1 80,tr . . �� ` J1 11__I 61 1*----.1). i I Ps �' ,__ • �' 11001159.a$5J �, AO rra, I. • Eb to 1` FUr�er Aa3'49'4 • S•ess' I. , �. /iC` SrAr R•32s oo' ;. 1 F hlfGy AY 1 '.. . :.::'. D 14 V CRpNA51, 1:i•V: ti;,Sti;' •v100.00' 1i;.1 �:`: tip.•: _ _. .. _...__. _ib .•::: EX ST HIGHWAYIN io ; 1 ,STATE R.O.W. R.O/W N88°09'4911 106.95 _ _—.,_._,.__._�_ PROPOSED 6945 SF R.O.W. DEDICATION LEGEND • L�`'.,2,;izi PROPOSED R.O.W. DEDICATION EXISTING R.O.W.. , LIMITS OF PROPERTY R.Q.W. DEDICATION EXHIBIT OWNED BY DEVELOPER IN CONJUNCTION WITH (2141386-2909 THE AUSTIN OAKS ADDITION • DEVELOPER/OWNER THOMAS EASIER SURVEY, ANT. No, 458 AUSTOAK, INC. CITY OF SOUTHLAK£, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 945 ONE LINCOLN CENTRE ' 5400 LBJ FREEWAY DALLAS, TEXAS 75420 Llohliter/Jomeaon do As oolatee, trio,(214) 386-2909 CONSULTINO ENGINEERS and PLANNERS 1420 W. 40ca40e4Iw LN*. 1t1rn 300, WLLM.123LA3 76247. 214/430-2Ee7 1 • TRANSITION 11}IS EY.1-klE')i\ t p(�4�-T OF Ps TRi\fF‘6 OUT OF ACCELERATION LANE o QNQi-\"st 605011TTE0 IN \ci"lV. AFTER PRIVATE DRIVE Aco cc 1 T 15 F RG v`Q1 v TG \-\0`6 -ru E .33 t t c RC AD iaMD ' \-\ d i\4.. 6t6,1,4N4t= P,ND a PR0\70SE1, 1M??.0Vet'1ENT5 rN-N CNIN-WC" SH-114 SH-114 R3-5R w A�t 171-... EAST WEST -_____,' RIGHT TURN I lo EXTEND t DECELERATION LANE ONLY a o o. —T6' PAST `,`-Pr .-----------. YIELD ° INTERSECTION • .� a W3-tA STOP Ao"lore t8on `?' ♦ -- ExIetlnq_S.H. 114 R.O.W. __�+' AHEAD Lane 4' DOUBLE /� WHITE LINE imiimmiti N. s,H. 114 ---- Pro.(I. iv Cene ` !``�� lopp.• d a On°,wey to.° Rd. R8-3R .1\ ONE-WAY R11-1 KEEP OFF RELOCATE NMEDIAN EXISTING I STOP SIGNS Not to Scale AS NECESSARY - NOR3 RIG1HT TURN NOTE: Frontal® Rd, -Recommend speed zone be moved to City Limit. -Recommend lighting for both intersections. FIGURE 8 PROPOSED AUSTIN OAKS ACCESS ALTERNATIVE 1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER February 25, 1993 1i TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director, Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Animal Control This memorandum is an update on the animal control issue. Captain Les Smith from the Grapevine Police Department and I have been in contact, although somewhat haphazardly between his my schedules . I have provided Captain Smith with a list of calls-for-service that includes numbers and types of service requested. He is comparing those figures to his calls-for-service and resources that he has available to enable him to do his job in the area of animal control. After his evaluation, he and I can hopefully meet again sometime the first of next week. We will then attempt to solidify a basic plan to integrate our animal control situation with Grapevine's . Several issues that I feel we should consider are: 1. Strict monetary subsidizing to the City of Grapevine for service. 2 . Employ a part-time Street or Water worker, certify him as an animal control officer, provide him with the minimum necessities to perform. the level expected, and then contract with the facility at Grapevine to provide disposition of the animals after we deposit them at that facility. We should be able to bring forth more details on this subject by next Council meeting. I am available for any questions or comments that you might have. wBpYMemoAnmlCntl /! City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM L�1� February 25, 1993 73 TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Tree Preservation Ordinance Draft No. TWO dated 1/15/93 Attached you will find the above referenced draft of the Tree Preservation Ordinance for your review. There are still many additions and clarifications to be made to this ordinance. Our purpose in providing this to you at this point is to solicit your direction to aid in further development of the ordinance. Are we on the right track or did you have a different direction in mind? I hope to briefly discuss this draft with Council and pursue any recommendations that they might have. Please place this item on the next available City Council agenda for discussion. GL/gh Attachment: Tree Preservation Ordinance, Draft No. 2 DOCUMENT: MEMO/TRE.PRV FOLDER: PLANNER CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE DRAFT NO. TWO , DATED 1/15/93 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 . 0 PURPOSE 2 . 0 DEFINITIONS 2 . 1 General Rules 2 . 2 Definitions 3 . 0 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT REQUIRED 3 . 1 General 3 . 2 Municipal/Public Domain Property a. Permit Requirements 3 . 3 Existing R.O.W. and Public Easements a . City Projects 1 . Permit Requirements b. Franchise and Other Utility Companies 1 . Permit Requirements 3 . 4 New Developments a. Residential Subdivisions 1 . Permit Requirements b. Non-Residential Developments 1 . Permit Requirements 3 . 5 Private Property a . Agricultural b. Residential Homeowner c . Builders/Contractors 1 . Permit Requirements 3 . 6 Exceptions a. Damaged/Diseased Trees b. Public Safety c . Utility Service Interruption d. Business Interests 1 . andsca e ursery 2 . Golf Course uarries 4 . Council Approval 4 . 0 PERMIT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS 4 . 1 Authority for Review a. Planning and Zoning Commission b. Appeals 4 . 2 Submittal Requirements a . Tree Removal Permit (IL Fees) c . graphic Exhibit d. Permit Validity 5 . 0 TREE REPLACEMENTS //v ` � 6 .0 TREE PROT I . l rohibited Activities a. Material Storage b. Equipment Cleaning/Liquid Disposal c. Tree Attachments 6 . 2 Prior to Construction a. Tree Flagging b. Protective Fencing c . Bark Protection 6 . 3 Permanent Construction Methods a. Boring b. Cut/Fill 7 .0 TREE PLANTING RESTRICTIONS 7 . 1 Overhead Lines 7 .2 Underground Utilities 8 .0 ENFORCEMENT 8 . 1 Developers Agreement 8 .2 Building Permit 9 .0 VIOLATIONS 10.0 SEVERABILITY 11.0 CONFLICTING ORDINANCES 12 . 0 SAVINGS CLAUSE 13.0 PUBLICATIONS CLAUSE 14 . 0 EFFECTIVE DATE 15.0 APPENDICES A. Tree List: Quality, Marginal, Undesirable B. Example Tree Removal Permit C. Tree Exhibit (Dripline, canopy, root zone, etc. ) D. Methods of Protection (Snow fence, boarded skirt) E. Construction Methods (Cut/fill, boring) F. Example Homeowner Site Plan G. Example Builder Site Plan H. Example Developer Site Plan I . Tree Trimming Recommendations DOCUMENT: TREE/ORD.2 FOLDER: PLANNER2 1/15/93 �Y ///4 TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ESTABLISHING CRITERIA AND REGULATIONS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MATURE TREES; PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI , Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, trees are a valuable amenity to the urban environment and serve to create greater human comfort by providing shade, cooling the air and otherwise tempering the effect of summer heat, thereby reducing the requirements for air conditioning and the subsequent depletion of scarce energy resources ; and WHEREAS, trees purify the air by filtering pollutants and dust and release oxygen into the air; and WHEREAS, trees protect land and structures by reducing run-off, binding soil and minimizing flood damage; and WHEREAS, trees are known to add dollar value to residential and commercial property and to increase income levels and tax revenues by attracting new business , industry and residents through improving a city' s image; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to actively participate in the "Tree City U. S .A. " program and the "Keep Southlake Beautiful" program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has determined that tree preservation is necessary to adequately protect the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: //4 -9 ♦ 1 TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE 1 . 0 PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this ordinance is to encourage the preservation of mature trees and natural areas , to preserve protected trees during construction and to control the removal of protected trees when necessary. It is the intent of this ordinance to achieve the following: - Prohibit the indiscriminate clear cutting of property. - Protect and increase the value of residential and commercial properties within the City. - Maintain and enhance a positive image for the attraction of new business enterprises to the City. - Protect healthy quality trees and promote the natural ecological environmental and aesthetic qualities of the City. 2 . 0 DEFINITIONS 2 . 1 GENERAL RULES : For the purpose of this ordinance, the following rules shall be applied in constructing, interpreting or otherwise defining the terms and provisions hereof : a . Words used in the present tense shall include the future, words used in the singular number shall include the plural number and words used in the plural shall include the singular. b. The word "shall" is mandatory and the word "may" is permissive. 2 . 2 DEFINITIONS : For the purpose of this ordinance, certain words or terms applicable hereto are defined as hereinafter provided. Words and terms used in this ordinance, but not defined in this ordinance shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance or other ordinances of the City. Words and terms defined in two ordinances shall be read in harmony unless there exists an irreconcilable conflict in which case the definition contained in this ordinance shall control . BUILDABLE AREA: That portion of a building site exclusive of the required yard areas on which a structure or building improvements may be erected and including the actual structure, driveway, parking lot, pool and other construction as shown on a site plan. BUILDING PAD: The actual slab area of a building and a reasonable area around the slab necessary for construction and grade transitions . -1- DRIP LINE: , A vertical line run through the outermost portion of the crown of a tree and extending to the ground. MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC DOMAIN PROPERTY: Examples of this would include City Hall , public parks , Corps of Engineers property, State of Texas R.O.W. , library, fire stations , water tower sites or similar properties . PROTECTIVE FENCING: Snow fencing, chain link fence, orange vinyl construction fencing or other similar fencing with a four foot ( 4 ' ) approximate height . TREE : Any self-supporting woody perennial plant which will attain a trunk diameter of three ( 3) inches or more when measured at a point four feet above ground level and normally an overall height of at least twenty (20) feet at maturity, usually with one ( 1) main stem or trunk and many branches . It may appear to have several stems or trunks as in several varieties of oaks . TREE, MARGINAL: A tree which the City has determined may or may not be worthy of preservation depending on the individual characteristics of the tree. (See Appendix 'A' . ) TREE, PROTECTED: A specimen tree identified as a 'quality' tree by the City or a specimen tree in the 'marginal ' category which the Landscape Administrator has determined should be saved due to individual characteristics of the tree. TREE, QUALITY: A tree which the City has determined typically has significant positive characteristics worthy of preservation. (See Appendix 'A' . ) TREE, SPECIMEN: A tree which has a diameter of 12" or greater at a height of four feet (4 ' ) above the ground. TREE, UNDESIRABLE : A tree which the City has determined does not typically have characteristics worthy of preservation and may be removed at the discretion of the owner/developer. (See Appendix 'A' . ) YARD AREA: The front, side and rear yard areas as required under the comprehensive zoning code and the applicable zoning district. 3 . 0 TREE-REMOVAL PERMIT REQUIRED 3 . 1 GENERAL: No person, directly or indirectly, shall cut down, destroy, remove or move, or effectively destroy through damaging, any protected tree situated on property regulated by this ordinance without first obtaining a tree-removal permit unless otherwise specified in this ordinance. -2- //,G--6 3 . 2 MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC DOMAIN PROPERTY: All municipal or public domain property shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. a . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree, however protected trees to be removed must be shown on construction plans approved by the Landscape Administrator. 3 . 3 EXISTI G R.O.W. AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS : All construction d maintenances activity within City R.O.W. or public easements shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. a. City Projects : The City shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein on all projects . 1 . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree, however protected trees to be removed must be shown on construction plans approved by the Landscape Administrator. b. Franchise and Other Utility Companies : All utility company projects shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. 1 . Permit requirements: A tree-removal permit must be obtained prior to the removal of a protected tree. This permit must be accompanied by a site plan or construction plan meeting the graphic exhibit requirements specified herein. 3 .4 NEW DEVELOPMENTS : All developments which have not submitted final construction plans as of the effective date of this ordinance shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. a. Residential Subdivisions : All area within public R.O.W. , utility easements or dra. a e easements as shown on an a rove Final Pla and areas esignate as cut fill on the master drainage construction p an a proved b the Landsca e dministrator s al e exempte from he requirements specified herein. All other area shall be subject to these requirements . -3- 7/76-- 7 1 . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within said R.O.W. or easements, however a permit must be obtained prior to the removal of any other protected tree on the property. b. Non-Residential Developments : All area within public R.O.W. , public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, and the building pad, fire lanes and parking areas shown on an approved Concept Plan or Site Plan shall be exempt from the requirements specified herein. All other areas shall be subject to these requirements . 1 . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within an area noted in 3 .4-b above, however a permit must be obtained prior to the removal of any other protected tree on the property. 3 . 5 PRIVATE PROPERTY: a. A. ' ultural : Propert zoned 'A ' ricu tural .nd bein. active y use. agricultural s all be exempt rom the requirements specified herein. b. Homeowners : Individual homeowners shall be exempt from the requirements of this ordinance as it pertains to their ownership only. c. Builders/Contractors : All builders who have not submitted a request for a building permit as of the effective date of this ordinance are subject to the requirements herein. All area within the building pad, driveway, parking area and pool area as shown on an approved plot plan shall be exempt from the requirements of this ordinance. All other areas of the lot shall be subject to the requirements for tree preservation and replacement specified herein. 1 . Permit Requirements : A tree-removal permit shall not be required for removal of a protected tree within the area noted in 3.5-c above, however a permit must be obtained prior to the removal of any other protected tree on the property. 3 . 6 EXCEPTIONS: A tree removal permit shall not be required under any of the following circumstances . a. Damaged/Diseased Trees : The tree is dead, diseased, damaged beyond the oint of recovery, or in dan er o fal ing s determined by the Landscape Administrator. b. Public Safety: The tree endangers the public health, welfare or safety and immediate removal is required. c . Utility Service Interruption: The tree has disrupted a public utility service due to a tornado, storm, flood or other act of God. Removal shall be limited to the portion of the tree necessary to reestablish the utility service. d. Business In erests : The following business ventures sha a exempt from the requirements specified herein as follows . 1 . Landscape Nursery: All licensed plant or tree nurseries shall be exempt from the terms and provision of this section only in relation to those trees planted and growing on the premises of said licensee which are so planted and growing for the sale or intended sale to the general public in the ordinary course of said licensee ' s business . 2 . Golf Course: Golf courses shall not require a tree removal permit for removal of protected trees within areas designated as tee boxes, fairways or greens . All other areas shall be subject to th- requirements specified herein. 3 . Quarries : All approved quarry operations shall be exempt from the requirements specified herein within the limits of the active operations . 4 . Council Approval : Other unforeseen business interests may be exempted from the requirements herein only when so stated in developer' s agreement or on a Concept Plan approved by the City Council . 4 .0 PERMIT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS 4 . 1 AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW: The Landscape Administrator shall be responsible for the review and approval of all requests for all tree-removal permits submitted in accordance with the requirements specified herein. a. Planning and Zoning Commission: The Landscape Administrator may defer the approval of a tree removal permit to the Planning and Zoning Commission for any reason. All decisions made by the Commission shall be final . b. Appeals : Any decision made by the Landscape Administrator may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission. All decisions made by the Commission shall be final . -5- // - 4 . 2 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The Landscape Administrator shall establish administrative procedures necessary to facilitate the implementation and enforcement of this ordinance. a. Tree-Removal Permit: A request for a tree-removal permit must be submitted and approved prior to the removal of any protected tree in the City. (See Appendix ' B' for example permit. ) b. Fees : All tree-removal permits shall be accompanied by a check made payable to the City of Southlake in the amount specified by City Council. c. Graphic Exhibit: All request for tree-removal permits must be accompanied by a graphic exhibit showing at least the following. These requirements may be augmented by the Landscape Administrator as needed to administer this ordinance. 1 . Appropriate title ( i .e. Tree Removal Permit Exhibit. ) 2 . Title block includes street address, lot and block, subdivision name, city and date of preparation. 3 . North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. 4 . Name, address and phone of owner and person preparing the exhibit if different. 5 . Location of tree(s) to be removed is tied down with dimensions from nearest property lines . 6 . Caliper and common name of tree to be removed. 7 . Any required replacement trees shown with caliper size and common name of tree. d. Permit Validity: Permits for tree removal issued in connection with a building permit or site plan shall be valid for the period of that building permit ' s or site plan' s validity. Permit(s) for tree removal not issued in connection with a building permit or a site plan shall become void ninety ( 90) days after the issue date on the permit. -6- ///'"/v 5 . 0 TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS 5 . 1 General : In the event that it is necessary to remove a protected tree via permit approval or other appropriate process , the applicant, as condition to issuance of a tree-removal permit, may be required to replace the protected tree(s ) being removed with quality trees as defined herein or canopy trees as recommended in the Landscape Ordinance. A sufficient number of trees shall be planted to equal, in caliper, the diameter of the tree removed. Said replacement trees shall be a minimum of 3" caliper and 7 feet in height when planted. At the time of application review, the agent responsible for replacement, the time of replacement and the location of the new trees will be determined by the Landscape Administrator. 6 . 0 TREE PROTECTION (,—, A major purpose of this ordinance is to protect all quality trees which are not necessarily removed to allow approved construction to occur. The following procedures are deemed appropriate in the situations noted, however unique circumstances may allow modifications by the Landscape Administrator. 6 . 1 Prohibited Activities : The following activities shall be prohibited within the limits of the drip line of any protected tree subject to the requirements of this ordinance. a. Material Storage: No materials intended for use in construction or waste materials accumulated due to excavation or demolition shall be placed within the limits of the drip line of any protected tree. 9 b. Equipment cleaning/liquid disposal : No equipment W may be cleaned or other liquids deposited within Z the limits of the dripline of a protected tree. This would include paint, oil, solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar or similar materials . c . Tree Attachments : No signs, wires or other attachments, other than those of a protective nature shall be attached to any protected tree. 6 . 2 Prior to Construction: The following procedures shall be followed on all types of construction projects (i .e. residential subdivisions, commercial, multifamily, industrial developments , residential builders) . a. Tree Flagging: All protected trees within 50 ' of a construction area shall be flagged with bright green vinyl tape wrapped around the main trunk at a height of 4 ' or more such that the tape is very visible to workers on foot or driving construction equipment. -7- /7,(-—// ' b. Protective Fencing: In those situations where a protected tree is so close to the construction area that construction equipment will infringe on the root system, a protective fencing may be required between the tree and the construction activity. c. Bark Protection: In situations where a protected tree remains in the immediate area of intended construction, the tree shall be protected by enclosing the entire circumference of the tree with 2" x 4" lumber encircled with wire or other means that do not damage the tree. The intent here is to protect the bark of the tree against incidental contact by large construction equipment. 6 . 3 Permanent Construction Methods : a. Boring: Boring of utilities under protected trees may be required in certain circumstances . When required the length of the bore shall be the width of the canopy at a minimum and shall be a minimum depth of 48" . b. Cut/Fill : In situations where the grade change within the dripline of a protected tree exceeds six inches (6" ) , the procedures noted in Appendix ' E ' shall be required. 7 . 0 TREE PLANTING RESTRICTIONS 7 . 1 Overhead Lines : 7 . 2 Underground Utilities : 8 . 0 ENFORCEMENT 8 . 1 Developers Agreement: No developer' s agreement shall be approved which does not state that all construction activities shall meet the requirements of the tree preservation ordinance. 8 . 2 Building Permit: No building permit shall be issued unless the applicant has been given a copy of the tree preservation ordinance or a condensed summary of the relevant aspects pertaining to the type of permit requested. -8- //6 /1" 9 .0 VIOLATIONS 10 .0 SEVERABILITY 11. 0 CONFLICTING ORDINANCES 12 . 0 SAVINGS CLAUSE 13 .0 PUBLICATIONS CLAUSE 14 .0 EFFECTIVE DATE 15.0 APPENDICES r� It is anticipated that the following appendices will be changed periodically by the Landscape Administrator in response to changes in the administration of this ordinance. -9- //�-/3 ,ram 111 IN,wf Sty►ALL Ll-lANG7�S MADe- i-M2L APPENDIX 'A' The following is a summary of representative trees for each category of tree. See definitions section for description of the tree categories. QUALITY TREES Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes Pecan Carya illinoensis Pecan fruit, compound leaves Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia Deciduous, 1"-2" dark green leaves Red Oak Quercus shumardii Deep pointed lobes in leaves Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1 1/2" dark green pointed leaves Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa Large acorn, leaf broader at end Post Oak Quercus stellata Deep lobes, rounded tip on leaf Black Jack Oak Quercus marilandica Leathery 3"-7" leaf, no lobes Lacebark Elm Ulmus parvifolia Small dark serrated green leaves Chinese Pistache Pistacia chtnensis 3" sickle leaflets, fall color Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Star shaped leaf Austrian Pine Pinus nigra Two needles Chinquapin Oak Quercus muhlenbergii Oblong 4" - 6" serrated leaf Southern Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora Large evergreen leaf, white flower Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum Feather-like foliage, fall color MARGINAL TREES Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes ;ottonwood Populus deltoides Deep fissures in bark, heart shape leaf >ugar Hackberry Celtis laevigata Rough corky warts on bark Mesquite Prosopis glandulosa Lacy open foliage, 10" bean fruit Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Large leaf, round ball fruit Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Narrow interwoven fissures in bark American Elm Ulmus americana 'V' shaped main branching Slash Pine Pinus elliotti Honeylocust Gleditsia triacanthos Lacy foliage, thorns, bean fruit Globe Willow Salix matsudana globosa UNDESIREABLE TREES Common Name Botanical Name Identification Notes Mimosa Albizia julibrissin Pink flower, lacy foliage, bean fruit Catalpa Catalpa speciosa 14"-16"Cigar looking fruit, large leaf Bois d'Arc Maclura pomifera Horseapple Fruit Chinaberry Melia azedarach 1/2" yellow hard berry-like fruit Black Locust Robinia pseudoacacia Short spines at base of leaf Siberian Elm Ulmus pumila Often called 'Chinese Elm' Willow Salix babylonica Branches arch to ground Mulberry Morus rubra Large green leaves, smooth bark Western Soapberry Sapindus drummondii 18" compound leaf, 1/2" clear fruit Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Native, pyramidal shape Arizona Ash Fraxinus velutina Diamond fissures in bark Crabapple Malua spp. Tiny apple fruit, spring flower leodar Cedar Cedrus deodara Large pyramidal evergreen Ilver Maple Acer saccharinum Gray bark, silver leaf Boxelder Acer negundo 3-7 leaflets, 2"-5" long, light green -10- /6 /% EXHIBIT 'B' 01/15/93 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TREE-REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT NAME: LOT: BLOCK: STREET ADDRESS: OWNER CONTRACTOR/BUILDER NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: I hereby certify that this application meets the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and further certify that all construction pertaining to this project shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Signed: Title: Date: ***************************************************************************************** For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of this application and the application fee in the int of $ on this the day of , 19 Signed: Title: ***************************************************************************************** Shown Not On Plan Applic. GENERAL INFORMATION Appropriate title (i.e. Tree Removal Permit Exhibit) Title block includes street address, lot and block, subdivision name Title includes City and date of preparation North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity Name, address and phone of owner Name, address and phone of person preparing the exhibit Location of tree(s) to be removed is tied down with dimensions from nearest property lines Caliper and common name of tree(s) to be removed Any required replacement tree(s) shown with caliper size and common name of tree Permit for tree removal approved the day of , 19 By: Title: vicinity map Owner: Mildred Moore White Chapel road Southlake, Texas Developer: Dayle Binder 41 1 Pecos Trail Irvin Texas 75063 (214 869-4066 Hm 214 869-0600 Wk .&CCLG.: 1 " =100' 0 20 40 80 80 100 150 200 CITY COUNCIL SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS APPROVAL DATE MAYOR SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS APPROVAL DATE CHAIRMAN SECRETARY 3.0 ac EUGENE M. WESTON 0-.. ;- W-t d 1 '[ 0- 1 7� According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map, Unincorporated Denton County, Community No. 480774, Panel No. 255E dated 1 1-20-91 , the subject property does not lie within a 100—year flood hazard area. Subject property lies in Zone C. I i i I SAM BASS W RIDGE ROAD i BLOCK "B' LAKEWOOD RIDGE ADDITION Rec. in Vol 14, Pg. 5 P.R.D.C.T. 4 0.550 ac I RONALD J. COOPER at ux KATHLEEN B. Rec. in Vol. 3131 Pg. 160 1 N 8 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNN OF TARRANI' WHEREAS, I, MILDRED MOORE, am the sole owner of a tract of land situated in the A. Robinson Survey, Abstract No. 1131, County of Denton, according to the deed recorded in Volume 371, Page 367, DRDCT, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod set at the Southeast corner of a 3.0 acre tract as conveyed to Eugene M. Weston by deed recorded on Page 125 of Volume 413 in the Denton County Deed Rec8rds and being in the West line of White Chapel Road and being S 11 14' 20" W a distance of 274.77 feet from an iron rod at the Southwest corner of Lot 3, Block A, TAKEWOOD RIDGE ADDITION, an addition to the City of Southlake, Denton County, Texas according to plat recorded on Page 5 of Volume 14 in the Denton County Plat Records; 7HENCE S 00 12' 40" W along the blest line of said White Chapel Road a distance of 549.32 feet to an old iron rod; THENCE N 890 40' 00" W a distance of 765.16 feet to an old iron rod; 11iEN 'E N 00 08' 00" E a distance of 544.86 feet to an iron rod set at the Southwest corner of said 3.0 acre tract; 7"ENCE East a distance of 765.9 feet to place of beginning, containing 9.615 acres or 418,813 square feet of land. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, MILDRED MOORE, being the sole owner do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as, Lot 1, A. ROBItiSM No. 1131 AODMON, an addition to the City of South lake,,,. Denton County, Texas, and I do hereby dedicate to the public's use the streets, (alleys, parks) and/or easements shown thereon. WITNESS my hand at Tarrant County, Texas, this the day of 1993. -MILDRED MOORE- BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared MILDRED MOORE, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for the purpose and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 1993. -NOTARY PUBLIC - My Commission Expires: PLAT SHOWING LOT 1 A. ROBINSON No. 1131 ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A 9.61 AC TRACT IN THE A. ROBINSON SURVEY, A-1 131 This plot is filed in Cabinet This is to certify that I, THOMAS L. THOMPSON, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from an actual survey on the ground; and that all corners, angle points, and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me or under my direction or super%ision. Thomas L. Thompson Texas Registration No. 1237 Slide -----, Doted FEB 2 2 ,s i In La1 NOTES i < Q NFA VIL y,• w 1. EXISTING DALDEN INDUSTRIAL FACILITY PROPERTY Q W . k O tf M M " Z I SITE LOCATION = q m 1 ZONED AG AGRICULTURAL WOQEQ UNDEVELOPED ANNEXED AND ZONED AG AGRICULTURAL, REQUESTED Y U ZONING S-P-1 DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT w O J LAND USE PLAN - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �� 3 ~ . Q U SHRUBS 4' O.C. WITH PHASE 6 AND FUTURE USES WITH EXISTING BUILDINGS AND FUTURE NOT TO SCALE �. FUTURE SECONDARY "9� PLANNED BUILDINGS. NO EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, TROPHY CLUB BOB JONES ROAD _ _ NO HIGHLY REACTIVE CHEMICALS AND NO EXPLOSIVE ESTATES w :i+ Q=. , /2 I.R.F. ACCESS GATE S 8 9 °2 7' 2 5" E ��'_ _ _EXISnNG 20' TRI COUNTY EASEMENT_ _ m O EXISTING 6' CIiA1N LINE FENCE WITH BARBED HARE 451.72 (- F �\ MATERIALS WILL BE PERMITTED. (+ �O 2. ALL DUMPSTERS SHALL BE SCREENED ON FOUR SIDES. >_ J -- 74- C- - ------ ------ S UTY EASEMENT 5f \ OO 1 SIDE YARD SETBACK1RSTC3. VARIANCE GRANTED FOR MASONRY REQUIREMENTS.QFUTURE DRIVEWAY�E7i FIRE LANE \ 4.ALL NEW PARKING AREAS AND NEW DRIVEWAYS SHALL O O ;.. \ ° _. .......M.. < . . Dw MATERIAL. BE OF AN ALL WEATHER SURFACEDTE L. ? l 1 1 I 113 FUTUREI PARKING � 9. 1 , 5. BUFFERYARD REQUIREMENTS:. R ti ry .: <� �'�\ SOUTH - SHRUBS 4' ON -CENTER WITH PHASE 4ST p Y _ I I I ( I � � 3 I / r WEST - SHRUBS 4 ON -CENTER AND UNDER -STORY TREES k�Yy -N `... t`S\\ GRASS -. � k �`. \ ��\ 20' ON -CENTER WITH PHASE 4 WESTLAKE 1 \ NORTH - SHRUBS 4 ON -CENTER WITH PHASE 6 p ` w. - - -�-- EAST SHRUBS 4' ON CENTER WITH PHASE 6 : N ► U TU RE *PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTIONof PHASES 6 do 7 „, `� `""� �` `� E LANE \ � \ 6. MAXIMUM HEIGHT 35 FEET, 2 1 /2 STORIES. VICINITY MAP I Z ARKIN-Z EXISTING SEPTIC FIELDS WILL BE ABANDONED -mil 20 FIRE ��\ 7.SEE SUBMITTED PHOTOGRAPHS FOR ARCHITECTURAL Y Y AND CONNECTION WILL BE MADE TO AN APPROVED r ` ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS. BUILDING EXPANSIONS Q- - -� SANITARY SEWER OR THE SEPTIC FIELDS WILL BE RELOCATED I I 140A0 \ �O. < a a c� _�-� \ AND FUTURE PRODUCTION BUILDINGS WILL BE OF THE SAME Q a �'- �V - - z I_ _�.._ I.. Z a \ \ �� TYPE AND STYLE. I �� • 1 8. EXISTING OUTSIDE STORAGE (5%) WILL BE PHASED OUT ` . WITH BUILDING EXPANSIONS. � o t s Z W X _ _ FUTURE G \ \ 9�0 A" o �- - x o`w M I I I UCTION BUILDIN ��o \ \\ s� SCHEDULED CONSTRUCTION p 60.00 GRASs- r I ©I PRODUCTION S .Ft. ( \ '� dEXISTING o WAREHOUSES 1961-1992 LEGEND z I } N e Z C.. I �, I 14 000 q °f �' - -� t � \ � © LOADING SPACES # x �n 8 MIN. 585 0 -- x o d Z QJ < fi~ L - I i o FF. o \\ D WAREHOUSE EXPANSION 1993 EXTERIOR SPEAKERS Y -� O O o a Z e .� WATER I \ 2) SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 1994 - AREA LIGHTING w z r WELL ". I I O ,, �(11-Y Z -- Y a LP GAS 0 t994 DIRECTIONAL LIGHTING w I �_ n� TANK I N 3 covERDE oWoc,K Y � � 1 0 30 60 o0o GATT / fS�NT�j ( WOOa�� _n." DOORWAYS Q 10. I 1. 0 0� 0 DIR. LIGHT-��' WATER. I` v►� - \ F \ SCALE FEET j0 pHt ,� \ \ O4 WAREHOUSE EXPANSION 1995 �---� OVERHEAD DOORS o Z _ Q TANK / W►�N � � `�"- do BLDG. RELOCATION �� EXISTING BRICK I 1400°� LE 1 ' - r` N VMTH PUMPER TRUCi(/ - \\ \ _ _.... ___ _..: BO00. DUMPSTER SCALE: 3O' } N w_ HOOK -LIP COVERED s \ O TANK AREA 1996 _ OFFICE BUILDING 5 COVERED i - 0 � /13 EXIST. PARKING • 9' 3 EXISn� � \ w \ PARKING SPACE e \ BUILDING PHASE NUMBER Z$ I �w 2,325 Sq.Ft. PARKING' (GRAVEL) P i \ \ 6 :3 5 PARKING • 10' SPACINGS i TO REMAIN UNTIL` _ \ .. _.. a� -,. (.. ; ,� � \ ®FUTURE PRODUCTION 1999-2000 U c� LOADING •f CD \ \ BUILDING a:.,. ►- _ a 3' X 10' X 4.5' SPILfF ® DOCK r \ < CONTAINMENT INLET - - - ti He 5 ARK G 9' \ :� \ 0 FUTURE PRODUCTION 2000-2004 3 e 8 • SP CIN Ho I - S�tILL t•1�' �NMENT R.C.P. d - \ \\ Z W 3 N 0 P N • FIRE LANE 36 ,. ,x \ \ BUILDING W z WM >� CONTAINMENT \ \ W6zi x I F „_ .P._.__n ASPHALT - w Box \ \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION EX. 8 A IN MAIN A LIGHT POLE LANE CD PAVEMENT ,'a CONCRETE Ft LIME •' I \ \ LINE f-ENTRANCE FIRE °' ' \ JIMMtE C. Ha LEY BEGINNING at a 1 2" diameter iron in found at the southwest corner E STING GATE v 4 / P ENTRANCE x FUTURE VOL. 2361, ItG. 762, \D.R.D.C.T. of said DALDEN tract, said point also being the southwest corner of '. .,SIGN : M AI NGS } i! PARKING • 9' SPACINGS a SP I 5 P 00000 PRODUCTION d. s \ a 52.57 acre tract conveyed to GENERAL TEXAS CORP. as described in °D \ volume 1293, page 439, said deed records, said point also being located GRASS 8 G `.,� \ at the intersection of the north right-of-way line of Bob Jones Road 0.500 GAL_ BUILDIN I -of-way Lu _...- UNDE\%LOPED\ a public right of way of undetermined width, and the east right-of-way ZONED AG l�GRICUL�` RAL line of T.W. King Road, a public right-of-way of approx. 65 ft. in width; p i 10.E GAL O n " " F" "` I © GRASS r w i T K t0.00° < 14,000 Sq,Ft. I LAND USE PLAN - MEDIUM DENSI Y RESIDENTIAL from said POINT OF BEGINNING the southeast corner of Lot 1217, to l GAL- ; W I ,, O 1 1 W 1 to,000 A A T5 MIN. FF. 587 \ \ Trophy Club Addition, Section 10, according to, the plat recorded in Slide 189 D.C.D.R. bears N 89' 09 36 W, 66.59 feet F-- � EXISTING 1 � I '-. I '", \ \ Cabinet B, f , Q O U © TR AILER i CONTAIN ENT ® to.0o0 GAL o0o GAL < SITE �ATA 86 0 ® EM. TANK o I and N 00' 44' 18" E, 71.75 feet; �•� © "� ` GROSS DATA 277�586 S.F. \�.3725 ACRES (n :r- `i� T NEW LOCATION ©F. ` CHEM. TAN g > I a ROW DEDICATION 1,86 S.F. 0429 ACRES W cn EXIST. METAL BUILDING ' 4 j2'00° GAS.. THENCE N 00'32'30" E with said east right-of-way line, 520.80 ft. NET AREA LOT 1 275,7t\7 S.F. 6. 96 ACRES 9 y m mw < 2,300 Sq•Ft• COVERED TAI NT + \ \ to a 1/2" diameter iron pin found at the northwest corner of said DALDEN tract; _j LOADING SECONDARY CON TOTAL FlNAL\BUILDING COVERAGE 80,384 S. . 29.2%OF LOT 1 »wx_ _ I THENCE S 89'27 25 E deporting said right-of-way line and with the north x �la,:� cr w _ " _ _ _ COVERED CONCRETE AREA O N DOCK LOADING OPEN C O U 9; ©® OPEN SPACE t09,180 S.F� 39.67f; ok LOT 1 boundary line of said DALDEN tract, 451.72 ft. to a 1/2" diameter iron pin found DOCK COVFRED \ �1 - 23. i6 \ at it's northerly northeast corner; ON � $R ® e� TAT` ARE 30 °.00' \ C A w B THENCE S 38'48'29" E continuing with said DALDEN boundary, U I � } ' � - 206.53 a- a 27.74' �- �- - - - - � EXISTING EMERGENCY g y 140.63 ft. to a t�T 5, 0 0 LNG E SION CONCRETE SHOWER 29.38' `� 15' RAMP �t'si� TE 1 /2" diameter Iron pm found at it's easterly northeast corner; TRUCK�1' BUILD N 4,500 Sq._Ft•..... _.......w . PAVEMENT V1LY WELLD - °. HEA THENCE S 00'33'05" W with the east boundary line of said DALDEN tract, _...... . _ XPSION DIR. LIGHT ,{ I I OOpE� 414.86 ft. to a 1 2" diameter iron i BUILDING E I w / pin found In said north right-of-woy 0 0.87 line of Bob Jones Road, said point being the southeast corner of said DALDEN tract; DIR. LIGHT 14,106 Sq.Ft. SHED line z EXISTING METAL m I O4 • 0( THENCE N 89'09'36" W with - � t said right -of way line, 540.82 ft. (DEED CALL 538.80 FT.) Z BUILDING LP GAS TANK w I to the place of BEGINNING and containing 6.3725 acres of land as surveyed on the W � A Z 10,345 S q.Ft o t O ground In the month of November, 1992, by EVERAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. Z � G METAL DIR. LIGHT f EXISTiN z � s` BUILDING ;.. GRASS Z � '� • 59 12,243 Sq•Ft. O SIGN �1 ,t �' I DALDEN CORPORATION i METER DIR. LIGHT DIR. LIGHT GA I SITE PLAN FOR AN S-P-1 ZONING REQUEST ` N EXISTING 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE FOR W �, 182.26' BUILDING EXP99M GA VA r„ CONCRETE FLUME / 39.0 $ WITH BARBED WIRE D D N 3,575 Sq.Ft• a LOT 1 Cp GRASS 4 � � SHRUBS 4' O.C. & UNDERSTORY RAVEL DRIVEWAY_�� ;, 2 R.D. PRICE NO, 992-D ADDITION 0 TREES 20 O.C. �--To RR4AW--UNnL1RC__ •� t�, I 1 25' BUILDING LINE 1--------------- c, _ _ BEING A 6.3725 ACRE TRACT OUT OF THE . 0• B • ' `- GRASS WOOD FENCE Du�MP� - o GRASS - - - - - - - - - - -� � R.O.W.R 0 W. DEDICATION �p -- SHRUBS 4 O.C. WITH PHASE 4 ACCESS - ► _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ R.D. PRICE SURVEY,ABSTRACT N0. 992 �' FUTt 1 _ ,• _ WITH GATE L_.. = _ 21 . 7 3 R 9 : {}p-- - - - - - - - - - - •4i-1r - „ - 20 TRI coutvrY 176.25' I POWER EASEMENT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS 3.7 F.H. H T ` ` FUTURE 12" WATER LINE • ' �- FUTURE 2" WATE LINE BY QTHERS 09 1�/2w I.R.F .. _ N 89 36 W L _ - - - - BY OTHERS , w�:� -- ,, f H � °1 1993 (EXISTING 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH BARBED WIRE) PROP. ULVT. - .,.5 ... 0.82 SIGN -� -- w _ __... o o� -..- 1/2" I.R.F. REVISED PER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL FEBRUARY 16, 1993 I � u SIGN - EMERGENCY ACCESS GATE r7) -ON `FS OWNER/DEVELOPER --BO-ROAD - - C.L. EXISTING PAVEMENT - - - - DALDEN CORPORATION O -- - ._�_.. _ 285 T.W. KING DRIVE VERA GE w w.. 93 - - -SIGN- -- - � - - - - M._.. _.. �- - - - -- � - M _...� .,_ SOUTHLAKE, ITEXASI 76092 Pro!� °' � APPARENT SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY (BASED ON 1' SOUTH OF EXISTING POWER P01_ES) N ULTANTS I �_ �' - - P.O. BOX 1865 O =_ "" TEL RISER ENGINEERS" PLANNERS• SURVEYORS UNDEVELOPED GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 ZONED "AG" AGRICULTURAL METRO(817) 430-4288 2630 West Freeway, Suite 100 +J TE RISER LAND USE PLAN - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FAX (817) 491-3809 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Metro (817) 429-7560 ATTN: GARY REED, FAX (817) 429-9322 SIGN VICE PRESIDENT OPERATIONS EC#910034 /I H/ 1131 BANK A G LUD -76 5.9 7/1131 BROOKS 8/ 113 1 WESTON AG LUD 91 Adjacent triptiv Block 1131D Lot (I' Jtugene?.* 7 Bob Brooks 11 10 : ,irlinon Sta -- Jkdank -:icooptR, Block 992D /-A(; Lot 1 R. 4orry trie 2 (tigsby tT_AL 3 J"es .0;. Evans 4A Joe Nol*n Xeals 4 Pjmolai. Meals Block 5 Lot 1 &,2 Howaro Perdue 3 & 4 Ronall & Kathleen C am t 5 S. Z . Hoban 6 B. D. Spillman 7 K. R. Gakloway 8 Charles F-*.znandez 9 Lloyd Hopomb L.U.D. = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL r I/B PERDUE LUD SFIA t _ E 3/B COOPER !UD S F I A 12-14-92 4/13 COOPER LUD S F I A VICINITY MAP IN "t ow" CmIt", vow _x- 00 ... ... T ___-_ T____________ ___ Lr) Itie following doticribed tract or pa=4 st land situated in the A. Robinson SVrvey, A-1131, at %Wum roowded on Dw%bw OAMty, Texas and being the '7 Sam& tract as—Aw 367 e 371 in the Denton County Dead RGOOLds and being noire particularly described as follows: BMIMING at an iron rod set at the Souttioast corner of a 3.0 acre tract as W Digene 14-_111%til bY dIeW recotdad an . ..... .... _i, 7 Page 125 of Volume 413 in the Dw*oo oXalty Deed ftoorft 0-4 being in the West line of Whito . . .. .... chapa INDWI IMENCE S 00 12' 40" IN along the Mpt Um of said White Chapel a distance of 549.32 feet to ai), pJ4, JVm rod, IWENM N 819 0 401 00" W a distwxx of 765.16 foot to an old Iran rod; THENCE N 00 08' 00* E a distance of 544.86 feet to an iron rod set at the corner cner of saidI 3.8 acre tract; a distance of 765.9 960t to place of begi 1 - -------- TWENCE East containing 9.615 acres or 418,813 square fSet of land 7 NT_ ---- ---- --- 7 CONCEPT PLAN FOR ------ SUP EQUESTRIAN USE 1&7 F.. ..... 41 'AX IO/B COOPER E X I S T I N G Z 0 N I N G AG LUD SFIA A ARE A o, 9.73 ac 42 3,838 . ......... . BUILDING COVERAGE 8.5 % 3 6, 0 1 6 sqf t. A 765.16 EXISTINGACCESS EASEMENT 4/992 MEALS 4A/992 MEALS 3/992 EVANS B FERNANDEZ LUD AG LUD AG- 2/992 (,RIGSBY etol. VERIFY w/ SURVEY 1/992 GORRY SFIA LUD LUD AG LUD AG LUD AG C ONC E P T L A N►� 051052025 50 100 150 200 9/ 8 HOLCOMB S H 0 W TI M E FARMS, INC. /APPLICANT 1� =59-1m P L A N SFIA LUD CITY OF SOU THLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS SCALE I "= 40 NORTH CHARLES R. LITTLE ARCHITECT .12 /14 /19 9 2 C-URRENT BUSINESS ADDRESS (2 14) 5 2 2 8836 4500LASH,SENAOAH REV 1/8/93ND DALTEXAS 75205 DAYLE BINDER PAUL HAUNERT 411 PECOS TRAIL IRVING9 TEXAS 75063 (214) 869- 4066