1075-C ORDINANCE NO. 1075-C
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ADOPTED
MOBILITY MASTER PLAN OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 1075, AS
AMENDED, AS AN ELEMENT OF THE SOUTHLAKE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCLUDE PRIORITIZING
SIDEWALK PROJECTS, ADD NEW ROAD PROJECTS,
ADD A STUDY OF THE SH 114 CORRIDOR REGARDING
CAPCITY IMPROVEMENTS AND CONGESTION
REDUCTION AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted
by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the
Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 11.05 of the Southlake City Charter provides for the adoption and
updating of a Comprehensive Master Plan and its components, including the Master
Thoroughfare Plan(known as the Mobility Master Plan); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the recommendations in the Mobility Master
Plan herein reflect the community's desires for the future development of the City's
thoroughfares, sidewalks, and other transportation methods,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS:
SECTION 1
Pursuant to Section 11.05 of the Southlake City Charter, the Comprehensive Master Plan, of
which the Mobility Master Plan is a component, may be submitted in whole or in part from time
Ordinance No. 1075-C
to time to the Council for their adoption, accompanied by a recommendation by the Planning and
Zoning Commission, and shall contain a planning consideration for a period of at least ten (10)
years. The Mobility Master Plan is noted by written description in Exhibit"B".
SECTION 2
The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and amended by
the City Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Secretary of the
City of Southlake, along with a copy of the minute order of the Council so adopting or approving
same. Any existing element of the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been heretofore
adopted by the City Council shall remain in full force and effect until amended by the City
Council as provided herein.
SECTION 3
This ordinance shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council
and subject to the City Council motion as indicated on Exhibit"A".
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 16th day of November, 2021.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
By 1,
N:4``u�AKFgAPOa, Jo fa a or
oT�,
J °
ATTEST: .z• co ° °° f
eyp
• .s
Amy elley os .......° * ®®oit A' o
City Secretary ®A®®e�aa'a '%
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 7th day of December, 2021.
Ordinance No. 1075-C
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
•
By•
Jo H fin a or
ATTEST: ®®�°°�°v�H LA � yN,
Amy elle b ®v' • o
City Secretary le
®s��00®®9�*—Pk t \
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
age.J
City Attorney
City of Southlake, xas
D,{C: 12 "� 21
ecceckive
EE
1
Ordinance No. 1075-C
EXHIBIT A
City Council Motion at 1st Reading:
November 16, 2021; 1st reading approved (7-0) on consent.
City Council Motion at 2nd Reading:
December 7, 2021; 2nd reading approved (7-0), subject to Staff Report dated November 30,
2021, approving the amendment to amend the sidewalk priorities as presented in the staff report
and noting the following modifications to the priority list based on the Planning & Zoning
Commission and citizen feedback:
• Randol Mill Sidewalk from Morgan Road to Dove Road which is classified as,a priority
segment with a Tier 2 designation, with design and construction dependent on
coordination with the Town of Westlake. Southlake must either have permission to
construct the sidewalk along Randol Mill Avenue within the Town of Westlake or
Westlake must have built a sidewalk from Dove Street to the City of Southlake corporate
limits. Further, due to the cost of the project, construction is dependent on right of way
acquisition and funding availability. Grant funding may be a possibility as intercity
connectivity and improving safety are typical grant evaluation criteria categories.
• Next, E. Highland Street Project number 492. Move this project from a Tier 3,to Tier 1
project due to the connectivity to the middle school. There may be opportunity to
construct this segment in coordination with the Highland Street waterline project
scheduled for next fiscal year.
• Next is E. Dove Road Project 491. Move this project from a Tier 3 to a Tier 1. However,
due to the cost of the project, construction is dependent on the right of way acquisition
and funding availability. Grant funding is a possibility as this project would help link
Southlake and Grapevine's sidewalk networks, and interregional connectivity is an
evaluation criteria category for some grants.
• Next is South Peytonville Project 304. Move this project from Tier 3 to Tier 1 to improve
connectivity between Continental Boulevard and F.M. 1709.
• Next is North Peytonville Project 204. Maintain this project as Tier 3. Due to the cost of ,
this project, construction is dependent on right of way acquisition and funding availability. '
• Next is South White Chapel Blvd from F.M. 1709 to Continental, which is to maintain the
classification of this section as a "future sidewalk" project.
• Next is the Davis Blvd Project 469. Moving this project from a Tier 3 to a Tier 2 to
complete the connection between F.M. 1709 and Continental Blvd.
• Next is Shady Oaks Project 476a. Moving this project from a Tier 3 to a .Tier 2 to
complete the connection between F.M. 1709 and Highland Street.
• Next is Carroll Avenue between S.H. 114 and Whispering Lane, classifying this sidewalk
as a "priority segment" with a Tier 2 designation. Completing the.gaps in this area would
provide a continuous sidewalk along the east side of Carroll Avenue from Dove to
Continental Boulevard.
Also approving the amendments to the official pathways map which is Zena Rucker Road and ,
North White Chapel Boulevard, and the addition of roadway projects Shady Oaks and Highland
intersection and the SH 114 lane addition and ramp reversal studies as presented in the staff
report. Also noting MT51 which is the Shady Oaks Highland intersection improvements which
would include the implementation metric of evaluating the final analysis and including the staff's
incorporation of feedback from the HOA representatives of Coventry Manor. Finally, approving
all edits to the master plan as detailed in the staff report.
Ordinance No. 1075-C
EXHIBIT B
City of So uthlake
Mobility Master Plan
An Element of the Southlake
Comprehensive Plan
Adopted by Southlake City Council
Ordinance No. 1075-C
December 7, 2021
Prepared by
Planning & Development Services Department
and
Public Works Department
LUiKN i�
G
V� GO). ry
garA% ENVISION J ���,•�
= I� 4
SOUTHLAKE ~QY4J)
v2035
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
SOUTHLAKE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION
John Huffman Daniel Kubiak
Mayor Chairman
Chad Patton Michael Forman
Mayor Pro Tern Vice Chairman
Randy Williamson
Deputy Mayor Pro TernMichael Springer
Kathy Talley
Place 1 Gina Phalen
Randy Robbins
Place 2 Craig Rothmeier
Ronell Smith
Place 4 Scott Dyche
Amy Torres-Lepp
Place 5 Austin Reynolds
CITY STAFF
Rob Cohen, P.E. Shana K.Yelverton
Director of Public Works City Manager
Kevin Ferrer, P.E. Alison Ortowski
Deputy City Engineer Assistant City Manager
Kevin Taylor, P.E. Ken Baker,AICP
Civil Engineer Senior Director of Planning&Development Services
Bryan Ahumada Dennis Killough,AICP
Engineer in Training Deputy Director of Planning& Development Services
Patrick Whitham Jennifer Crosby,AICP'
GIS Analyst Strategic Initiatives Principal Planner
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
IMPORTANCE OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1
RELATIONSHIP TO SOUTHLAKE'S STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 2
PURPOSE AND RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3
Exhibit 1: City of Southiake Strategy Map 4
GOALS &OBJECTIVES OF THE MOBILITY MASTER PLAN 5
8 BACKGROUND
LOCATION, CHARACTER& RESOURCES 8
DEMOGRAPHICS 9
MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 13
14 THOROUGHFARES
REGIONAL TRENDS 16
FUNCTIONAL ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS 17
STREET DESIGN STANDARDS , 22
Exhibit 2:Master Thoroughfare Plan 29
INTERSECTION STUDIES 30
TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES 33
STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS 38
ILLUMINATED STREET SIGNAGE 39
ACCESS MANAGEMENT 39
MAP 40
THOROUGHFARE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS (SEE APPENDIX)
41 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 41
HISTORY OF ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IN SOUTH LAKE 41
REGIONAL PLANNING 42
MOVING FORWARD 43
BICYCLE FACILITIES 45
Exhibit 3:Bicycle Facility Master Plan 50
BICYCLE FACILITY MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS (SEE APPENDIX)'
SIDEWALK FACILITIES 51
Exhibit 4:Pathways Master Plan 54
SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION PRIORTY LIST (SEE APPENDIX)
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS (SEE APPENDIX)
CROSSWALKS 55
58 IMPLEMENTATION, PRIORITIZATION AND EVALUATION
PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 58
PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE 58
59 APPENDIX A: Level of Service (LOS) Descriptions 59
61 APPENDIX B: South Village Center Drive Guidelines 61
65 APPENDIX C: Summary of all Southlake 2035: Mobility Master
65
Plan Recommendations
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
INTRODUCTION
-. -"�'t
Continental Boulevard
One of the most important issues for Southlake citizens is transportation. Transportation is vital to the quality
of life and economic viability of the community. The City of Southlake Mobility Master Plan is a comprehensive
plan for transportation systems that will serve the mobility needs of residents, businesses, and visitors and will
guide transportation investments. It is multimodal —that is, it addresses mobility needs for vehicles, bicycles
and pedestrians. The purpose of the Mobility Plan is to identify the transportation needs of the City. It identifies
the future transportation network that will be needed to serve the projected population and employment
growth and increased travel demand. The Plan identifies policies, programs and projects for implementation
and development and guides funding decisions. The Plan is divided into the following sections:
1. Introduction
2. Background
3. Thoroughfares
4. Active Transportation
5. Implementation, Prioritization and Evaluation
IMPORTANCE OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
The transportation system forms one of the most visible and permanent elements of a community.Accordingly,
the Mobility Plan establishes the framework for the community's growth and development and, along with the
Future Land Use Plan, forms a long-range statement of public policy. By incorporating programmed land uses
and densities of the Future Land Use Plan, strategies can be developed that maximize the land use /
transportation relationship.
As Southlake experiences further residential and commercial growth and approaches build-out,transportation
facilities and internal movement become greater concerns. Accessibility to industrial and commercial areas,
residential neighborhoods, schools, recreation centers and other traffic generators is essential in creating a
transportation system that will move goods, services, and people efficiently, conveniently, and safely.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 1
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
In order to support land-use activities, Southlake's
transportation infrastructure must be planned to anticipate
future traffic demand, minimize unnecessary traffic -
movement and establish a transportation system which adds - �'
to rather than detracts from the quality of life. The direct 4.`
relationship between land use and transportation is ,•
complex; different land uses generate varied intensities of traffic that influence the demand for transportation systems, -
and transportation systems influence the development of - --
land use activities. -_�
Recognizing this inter relationship, there must be a .
coordinated, continuing, and comprehensive effort in South Peytonville Avenue ,
planning transportation systems and land use. Any
transportation system planned should balance the needs of the automotive mode of transportation and non-
automotive modes of transportation. At a local scale, this includes bicycle and pedestrian modes and atj a
regional scale, rail, air, and other modes of travel. A truly multi-modal approach to transportation is required lin
order to address existing and future local and regional mobility and air quality challenges.
Benefits of a well-planned intermodal transportation system include:
I �
• Efficient access to daily activities and services
■ Availability of transportation options
• Improved environmental quality
■ Improved personal health
• Economic vitality and sustainability __-
The major principles underlying this Master Plan are focusing on future I
development near existing transportation corridors, ensuring land uses
are supported by an efficient local roadway network, supporting active
modes of transportation such as walking and biking and ensuring that
transportation options are maximized for all community members.
Cotton Belt Trail along S.H.26
RELATIONSHIP TO SOUTHLAKE'S STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Strategic planning is an ongoing process where resources, critical concerns, community priorities and citizen
needs are combined to produce both a plan for the future and a measure for results. More specifically,
Southlake's Strategic Management System links the City's day-to-day activities to a comprehensive long-te'rm
strategy for public policy and management decisions.
The Strategic Management System identifies Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives to guide effective and efficient
resource allocation and provides benchmarks to assess performance. The Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives
are driven by the City's Citizen Survey and are outlined in Exhibit 1: City's Strategy Map shown on page 4.
The Strategic Management System guided the development of the Southlake 2035 Plan Vision, Goals and
Objectives (VGO), which define a desired direction for growth in the City. As such, all recommendations in the
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 2
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Southlake 2035 Plan are tied to at least one Strategic Focus Area from
the Strategic Management System and at least one objective from Citizen Satisfaction Survey
the adopted Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals and Objectives. These _ _
recommendations guide the development of the Capital
Improvements Program (a five-year plan for the purchase, r' '' '"7
71
construction or replacement of the City's physical assets) as well as StrategicManageme `ifts*
departmental business plans. In turn, the Capital Improvements - . ..
Program and departmental business plans dictate the City's day-to-
day activities and ensure the City is working to achieve the Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals
community's goals. and Objectives
Further, the Southlake 2035 Comprehensive Plan assists the City
Council, Boards and Commissions in decision-making by establishing Comprehensive Plan
a blueprint for the City's future. For example,the Planning&Zoning Elements
Commission and City Council use the Mobility Master Plan to evaluate -------- — -- --
requests related to roadways,sidewalks, and pathways to determine ,
the community's needs and goals. Using the Plan as a guide helps to
secure the community's vision for mobility. City Activities and Operations
Results
1
RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1
r 1 1 ` ` The Mobility Master Plan is a component of the Southlake 2035 Plan,the City's
W1 comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan is a reflection of the
X ; , ` community's values and serves as pa blueprint for Southlake's future. More
specifically, the comprehensive plan establishes a framework to coordinate
`1 0' `��, the City's activities and to guide the City's decision-making for the next 20
Years. As such, the comprehensive plan and its components are updated on
Ala" '' ` a regular basis.
D% % i ' The Southlake 2035 Mobility Master Plan includes and updates three master
O `� `� plan elements: the Sidewalk Plan, the Pathways Plan, and the Mobility and
2 3 5 Master Thoroughfare Plan. The first Mobility Plan combining these elements,
0 the Southlake 2030 Mobility Master Plan, was adopted in 2014. Combining
these elements helps the City achieve a more complete and comprehensive mobility system by planning for all
modes of transportation concurrently.The Mobility Master Plan will be utilized in setting priorities in the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) planning process, updating relevant ordinances and policies, and creating new
mobility-related ordinances or policies as needed.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 3
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Exhibit 1
'Er
`; c' The City of Southiake provides municipal services that support'the.highest quality of life for our residents,businessestondtvi�sito `
,,,,,,,,,o .41111111(p, ti., We do this by being an exemplary model of balancing efficiency,fiscal responsibility,transparency,and sustaina• bility4 ''
r DELIVER®N OUR ® US AREAS v
I i
® G I � i
ft 1 �7 %1 y .
CRITICAL S?fety& ili 1••]iqy I frastructure_ : quality Partnerships& Performance IV
Secu ityrts,, Development Votunleerism Management.&
,
BUSINESS OUTCOME'S $ Service Delivery
0301--Maintain a CB04—Optimize the
p plansquality Y ghigh ;:
implement base and qualit new businesses Cl.Achieve the CZ Provide travel C3 Provide attractive OUR CUSTOMERS fit'
strong financial City's commercial tax SERVE ,,
C4 Attract 8,keep top- CS Promote C6 Enhance the sense of
policies to ensure to reduce the tax highest standards convenience &unique'spaces for tier businesses to drive a opportunities for community by providing excellent i
future financial burden on residential of safety& within City& enjoyment of dynamic&sustainable partnerships& customer service and citizen tl
strength. taxpayers. security region personal Interests economic environment volunteer involvement engagement opportunities
CBO2 Enhance CBO5—Improve MANAGE.THE BUSINESS
mobiii .through qUality of life through B2 collaborate with Ba Provide high
,, aggresssive traffic progressive B1Achleve best. B3 Enhance resident - BS Enhance service y'
select partners to quality services B6 Optimize use
l' management Im lementation of in-class status In• quality of life&business
delivery through continual' of technology i
g P Implement service. through sustainable '
`initiatives and capital Southlake's all City disciplines . solutions vitality through tourism business practices proress improvement ,
, project Comprehensive Plan
'; implementation. recommendations. - — "
PROVIDE FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP
.CB03—Engage in CBO6—Invest to F1 Adhere to financial management F2 invest to provide&maintain high quality F3 Achieve fiscal wellness F4 Establish&maintain effective
' thoughtful planning maintain strong:public principles&budget , public assets standards internal controls
.� to ensure continued safety to ensure a low - ' - '
high quality crime rate and ----- _ .
developmentthatis g cy _
effective.emer eh .. ,. 5- . --c ,P. OMOTE EARN G ir! 1T`-1 p
TN _
,i integrated well Into response. Li Ensure our people
L2.Enhance leadership L3 Attract,develop& LSEmpower;Informed L6 Foster positive
the current built •t understand the L4 Recognize&reward:
strategy&how theycapabiiitles to deliver retain a skilled decision-making at all employee
environment. tr high performers
contribute to It results. workforce - levels In the organization engagement
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 N [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 4
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
GOALS& OBJECTIVES OF THE MOBILITY MASTER PLAN
The Southlake 2035 Vision Statement expresses a desire for the City to continue to enhance its status as a
desirable, attractive, safe, healthy, fiscally-sound, and economically and environmentally sustainable
community. Mobility infrastructure plays a vital role in achieving this vision. Accordingly,the adopted Southlake
outlined 2035 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives included several mobility-related goals and objectives as below.
These goals and objectives guided the development of this plan and its recommendations to ensure that local
infrastructure will meet the mobility needs of future residents, businesses, and visitors.
Goal 1:Quality Development
Promote quality development that is consistent with the Urban Design Plan, well-maintained, attractive,
pedestrian friendly,safe,contributes to an overall sense of place and meet the needs of a vibrant and diverse
community.
Objective 1.2 Create and preserve attractive pedestrian-friendly streets and pathways to encourage
transportation alternatives to the automobile.
Objective 1.4 Emphasize creativity and ensure environmental stewardship in the design of all development
and public infrastructure, maximizing the preservation of desirable natural features such aIs
trees,topography, streams,wildlife corridors and habitat.
Objective 1.5 Promote unique community character through a cohesive theme by emphasizing,urban design
detail and performance standards for structures, streets, street lighting, landscaping, entry
features, wayfinding signs, open spaces, amenities, pedestrian/automobile orientation and
transition to adjacent uses.
Objective 1.9 Strengthen street and landscape design standards to enhance the visual quality along major
corridors.
Objective 1.10 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department iof
Transportation to improve the appearance of bridges, embankments and entryways into the
City.
Objective 1.11 Ensure that city- and developer-provided infrastructure is functional, aesthetically well-
designed, and integrated with the natural environment.
Objective 1.12 Continue to strengthen the City's regulations to encourage effective signage that is
appropriately designed and scaled to minimize adverse impacts on community aesthetics.
Goal 3:Mobility
Develop an innovative mobility system that provides for the safe, convenient, efficient movement of people
and goods,reduces traffic congestion,promotes energy and transportation efficiency and promotes expanded
opportunities for citizens to meet some routine needs by walking or bicycling.
I �
Objective 3.1 Provide a safe and efficient streets and pathways network that allows travel to shopping areas,
schools, parks and places of employment, reducing the need to travel on the City's major
arterials (FM 1709, FM 1938, or SH 114) and minimizes cut-through traffic',in residential
neighborhoods. I
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 5
(SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Objective 3.2 Implement and promote a mobility system that addresses safety, design,comfort and aesthetic
elements such as landscaping, crosswalks, railing, lighting, traffic-calming and signage in order
to provide distinct character and functionality for the City.
Objective 3.3 In accordance with a need identified by the Citizen Survey, provide and promote a continuous
pedestrian pathways system that is user-friendly,efficient,safe,economical,and connect parks,
shopping,schools,work and residential areas.
Objective 3.4 Pursue opportunities to link Southlake's pathways to systems in adjacent cities and trails on the
Corps of Engineers property.
Objective 3.5 Develop a program to encourage the dedication of easements for pathway construction in
accordance with the sidewalk priority plan and Capital Improvements Plan.
Objective 3.6 Identify and prioritize the funding and construction of mobility system capital improvements
projects according to the impacts on safety,system efficiency,costs,and maintaining acceptable
levels of service. I
Objective 3.7 Increase safe bicycle mobility when reasonably possible.
Objective 3.8 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of
Transportation to identify,design and implement projects that prevent or relieve congestion n
the area.
Objective 3.9 Continue to evaluate and improve upon the existing mobility system within the City,maintaining
existing infrastructure, making required improvements and evaluating innovative ways to
integrate transportation and land use.
Objective 3.10 Obtain adequate right-of-way for future roadway corridors and improvements.
Goal 5:Public Safety
Establish and maintain protective measures and policies that reduce danger, risk or injury to property GO
individuals who live, work or visit the City.
Objective 5.3 Ensure compliance with the stated standard of response coverage and industry guidelinles
through the provision of facilities, equipment, personnel and roadways.
Objective 5.6 Enhance and promote public safety through public-private partnerships and utilization and
training of volunteers.
Objective 5.8 Develop and implement safety education programs that enhance the quality of life and safety
in the community.
Objective 5.9 Promote security of public buildings and infrastructure.
Goal 6:Economic Development
Create a diversified, vibrant and sustainable economy through the attraction and support of business
enterprises and tourism meeting the vision and standards desired by City leaders.
Objective 6.1 Promote the City both nationally and regionally as a great place to live, work, visit, shop and
recreate.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 6
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Objective 6.3 Foster an environment that retains and supports existing businesses to ensure the sustainability
of our existing tax base. '
Goal 7:Sustainability
Encourage the conservation, protection, enhancement and proper management of the natural and built
environment.
Objective 7.2 Promote public awareness and education on such sustainability issues as public health, energy
and water conservation and overall environmental stewardship.
Objective 7.6 Protect and enhance air quality in coordination with federal, regional and local agencies.
Goal 9:Partnerships
Fully utilize and coordinate with the City's many partners to address issues facing the area,provide services
and facilities,promote volunteerism,support events and programs and encourage economic growth.
Objective 9.1 Partner with other government entities, non-governmental organizations and the North Central
Texas Council of Governments to address regional and local issues.
Objective 9.2 Continue mutually beneficial partnerships between the City and local school districts to explore
the provision of facilities, services, technology, and other opportunities through open
communication and close coordination.
Objective 9.3 Continue active partnerships with non-profit organizations,civic groups and local,businesses to
create opportunities that benefit the community.
Objective 9.4 Partner with local school districts to educate Southlake's youth in their municipality and seek
youth input when planning the future of our community. ,
Goal 10:Infrastructure
Through sound management and strategic investment, develop, maintain, improve and operate public
infrastructure that promotes health,safety and an enhanced quality of life for all members of the community.
Objective 10.1 Ensure equitably-distributed and adequate services and facilities.
Objective 10.2 Plan and program land acquisition and the installation of all essential public facilities Ito
reasonably coincide with the need for such facilities.
Objective 10.3 Identify and implement programs where costs may be shared by multiple agencies and/or
developers.
Objective 10.6 Maintain and enhance existing infrastructure and levels of service through the provision of
timely maintenance, repair and replacement as needed.
Objective 10.8 Provide a streetlight system for adequate illumination and a wayfinding signage system for
pedestrian and driver safety where appropriate.
� I
In addition to the goals and objectives noted above, the recommendations of this plan also help implement
other goals and objectives of the Vision, Goals& Objectives of the Southlake 2035 Plan.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 7
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
BACKGROUND
The citizens of Southlake, City staff, and the development community consider long-range planning to be one of
the most fundamental functions undertaken by elected and appointed officials in this municipality.The Mobility
Master Plan has undergone several iterations since it was initially adopted as the Major Thoroughfare Plan with
the City's first comprehensive plan in 1969. Like any good plan, it has evolved and become more relevant with
each examination.
1
ve-- `- SOUTHEAIE SOUT}iLAKE
:, """'! ilL.,Y 7-..11,
11
t nlHO ;..
'.1___,_,.._._..,,.1__,._ )M...a, 1'L11i,11 1
iii"imi
a�'� F, z, SouOilake 2025 Plan
` "m —►�*> `i:} _g1a Myauaermyma,eR,n
4 l - .
1 —r .11.1 nr,.II_,E=1�4�— 'L
^� 'f` °'1g am �rk '�..�.x lowt- gµ.2Iy 'e -- �.r.nm
--um = � .,�,,.. `�,...7 �...� 56i:p_:. - kl"2..,, 4yi+t" '�k /�,~—
•
1969 Major Thoroughfare Plan Southlake 2025:2005 Mobility&Master Thoroughfare Plan
The current update to Southlake's Mobility Master Plan integrates the Master Thoroughfare Plan,Sidewalk Plan,
and Pathways Plan, and provides additional considerations for bicycle facilities. Combining each of these
elements will help the City achieve a more complete and comprehensive mobility system, planning for different
modes of transportation.
1
LOCATION, CHARACTER& RESOURCES
i
Southlake is located in North Central Texas, DENTON 1
situated 23 miles northeast of Fort Worth and 25 ''t
II
miles northwest of Dallas. Dallas-Fort Worth ft
International Airport is only a few short miles to SOUTHLAKE
rexns
the southeast, and Lake Grapevine borders the61 j
city to the north. State Highway 114 runs AlEana
diagonally through the middle of the City, Aupott
I
heading east through Las Colinas and into * �m u'
downtown Dallas and west toward the Alliance 11
Airport corridor.
as
" A IntemnananallID
The City of Southlake now consists of a ' 0 ,,
approximately 22 square miles of land and has �° , ® ', Feld I
just over 31,000 residents. Throughout this time
FORT WORTH ARUNGTON WALLAS
_
the City has grown and become a premier I�
Southlake Regional Map 1
community in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 8
1
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
area.The City's dedication to quality development,sound fiscal policies and effective strategic management has
made it an exemplary community. Historically, Southlake's growth has always been automobile-'oriented and
characterized by large lot single-family development that was not pedestrian-oriented. This type of
development coupled with the City's desire to maintain its rural character generally resulted in the omission of
bike paths and sidewalks for practical and aesthetic reasons. However, as Southlake has transitioned from',a
rural community to a suburban city with numerous pedestrian-friendly destinations, the desire for active
transportation options has grown. In order to continue this level of quality of life it is important to have a plan
in place to meet the needs and demands of Southlake's residents while also considering the demands of the
region.
DEMOGRAPHICS
Southlake experienced rapid population growth between 1990 and 2000. This was a 205 percent increase in
population, among the highest in Texas during that period. With economic recession and less land available for
residential development, this trend slowed significantly between 2000 and 2010. As a result, the City has
developed more slowly in recent years and with less intensity than previously estimated.The ultimate build-out
population, estimated at 34,188, could be reached in 2030.
Demographic characteristics can help the City assess current and future needs for transportation facilities
consisting of roadways, sidewalks,trails and bikeways. Demographic profiles depicting age and income provide
snapshots of Southlake's current population, illustrate change over the past decade, and suggest trends for the
future.
31,265
City of Southlake 27,710
26,575
Population 24,900
21,519
13,350
I �
7,065
2,808
1980 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
f
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 9
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Historical Population (1990—2020)
Year Population 5-Year Growth Rate
1990 7,065 - •
-
1995 13,350 89%
2000 21,519 61%
2005 24,900 16%
2010 26,575 7% •
2015 27,710 4%
2020 31,265 13%
•
Source:NCTCOG and US Census Bureau
(2000 US Census,2010 US Census,2020 US Census,American Community Survey,
NCTCOG Annual Population Estimates)
Population by Age (2000-2010)
85+ 42162 •2000 Population
75 to 84 205
•2010 Population
111.1•
375
65 to 7401111
417
® 1023
55 to 64 11111111111111320
3,296
45 to 54 --- - 4,209
—... 6,352'
35 to 44 5,198
4,029
25 to 34 01111=11111111111=11 1,310
963
20 to 24 1.111 390OMAN 625
15 to 19 1,761
2,670
10 to 14 Imiimimimimmi2,512
3,186
5 to 9 z,sz3
-- _r 2,511
Under 5 �— 1,632
1,383
—
' I
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 10I
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Population by Age (2000-2010)
2000 2000 2010 2010 . %Growth
Population %of Total Population Population %of Total Population 2000-2010
Total 21,519 100% 26,575 100% 23.5%
Sex
Male 10,792 50.2% 13,313 50.1% 23.4%
Female 10,727 49.8% 13,262 49.9% 23.6%
Age
Under 5 1,632 8% 1,383 5% -15%
5 to 9 2,523 12% 2,511 9% -0.5%
10 to 14 2,512 12% 3,186 12% 27%
15 to 19 1,761 8% 2,670 10% 52%
20 to 24 390 2% 625 2% 60%
25 to 34 1,310 6% 963 4% -27%
35 to 44 5,198 24% 4,029 15% -23%
45 to 54 4,209 20% 6,352 24% 51%
55 to 64 1320 6% 3,296 12% 150%
65 to 74 417 2% 1023 4% 145%
75 to 84 205 1% 375 1% 83%
85+ 42 0.2% 162 0.6% 286%
Under 18 7,978 37% 7,080 27% 14%
65+ 664 3% 1,560 6% 135%
The 2010 census identifies 35-44 and 45-54 year '"` ' -). i _ , '$
rr �
olds as predominant age groups in the City of \ , 1. -..,--:.5"....-." ' �� Fj
Southlake, while nearly one-third of the �� 0 „....:------------
Southlake, r i,or II ,I�_ . . _
population is less than 18 years old. Between 6 6` ='
' �. J:- '1"' --- I'
2000 and 2010, the City saw a decrease in the - �,
population of children under 10, 25-34 and 35- - - " - -_ -* -`=--. _ - __
44 year olds,and an increase in youth 15-19,45- ' ,` ;-- - :4; n -,tea
54 and 55-64 year olds. Both the youth and the i . ;-T — '11�--7-, ,__
adult populations in Southlake are generally /n,' t\ I .-'c '
older than they were a decade ago. Looking -- -.
-
toward the next 10 to 20 years,it is possible that
�" -•
' /
u
the number of adults over 65 may increase T
significantly, depending on patterns of migration. Likewise, as new residential development slows and the City
reaches build out,the number and percentage of young children in the City may continue to decline. This would
ultimately impact the City's transportation systems by developing mobility options that are more oriented
towards an older demographic.
The average household income will also play a critical role in the type of mobility options the City provides. From
the 2000 census to the 2010 census the amount of households which earned over $200,000 dollars per year
more than doubled. In addition, approximately 81%of households in the City had an income level of more than
$100,000. What this translates to is that the preferred primary mode of transportation in the City is likely the
automobile. Active transportation facilities such as sidewalks and bikeways would more than likely serve for
recreational or leisure activities rather than commuting to work.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021, [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 11
1
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Household Income (2000-2010)
rimmmismi
$200,000 or more 1,529
^ 3,337
$150,000 to$199,999 1,129 T-- ._ _^� y
-- 1,523.
$100,000 to$149,999 i -- 1,691
1,354
1- 721
$75,000 to$99,999 �'386
$50,000 to$74,999 660
�az6
1111111 220 '
$35,000 to$49,999 IN 174
$25,000 to$34,999 1.83182
•
$15,000 to$24,999 • 152
152 ■2000 Households
$10,000 to$14,999 1 47 •2010 Households
■ 128 1
Less than$10,000 1 91
11 135 ,
I'�
1
Household Income (2000-2010)
2000 2000 2010 2010 % Chan e
Households %of Total Households %of Total 2000-2010
Households Households
Less than $10,000 91 1% 135 2% i 48%1
$10,000 to $14,999 47 0.7% 128 2% 172%
$15,000 to $24,999 152 2% 152 2% 0%
$25,000 to $34,999 182 3% 83 1% -54%;
$35,000 to $49,999 220 3% 174 2% I -21%!
$50,000 to $74,999 660 10% 426 6% -36%
$75,000 to $99,999 721 11% 386 5% -47%
$100,000 to $149,999 1,691 26% 1,354 18% ! -20%!
$150,000 to $199,999 1,129 18% 1,521 20% 35%11
' $200,000 or more 1,529 24% 3,337 43% 118%
Median Household Income $131,549 $182,237 39%1
Source:US Census Bureau(2000 US Census,2010 US Census)
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 12
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
*A41, A Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN) meeting was held to solicit
1SSPIN®fit public input.The SPIN forum fosters open and timely communication between the citizens and
®it city government regarding programs and issues affecting the quality of life in t community.
This forum encourages posi he tive relations and a stronger sense of community.
In addition, both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council held public hearings for the Mobility
Master Plan prior to adopting Ordinance No. 1075-C in November and December 2021.
In summary,the approval process for the Mobility Master Plan was as follows: I
1) SPIN meeting ". ",
J' I
2) Planning&Zoning Commission recommendation
3) City Council 1st reading
4) City Council 2nd reading(final plan approval)
V
I I
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 13
I �
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
THOROUGHFARES
A Thoroughfare Plan is a city's long-term system plan for its -
street network. It is the municipality's adopted general plan for •
guiding thoroughfare system improvements, including the
•
existing and planned extension of city streets and highways.The '
thoroughfare system is comprised of existing and planned
freeways, expressways, and major streets and highways, which - -
require wider or new rights-of-way and may ultimately be
developed as four-lane, six-lane, or wider roadways. The
primary objective of the thoroughfare plan is to ensure the 0.
reservation of adequate right-of-way on appropriate alignments _ — y
and of sufficient width to allow the orderly and efficient r��
expansion and improvement of the thoroughfare system to N.Kimball Avenue
serve existing and future transportation needs. Also, the
Thoroughfare Plan conveys the ultimate roadway system to
residents and businesses, which helps them in making sy`t.'i[•,
investment decisions.
Some of the benefits provided by effective thoroughfare
planning are itemized below: " �
• Reservation of adequate rights-of-way for future long-
11
range transportation improvements;
• Making efficient use of available resources by ---
designating and recognizing the major streets that will Carroll Avenue-Federal Way Intersection
likely require higher design of improvements;
• Minimizing the amount of land required for street and highway purposes;
• Identifying the functional role that each street should be designed to serve in order to,promote and
maintain the stability of traffic and land use patterns;
• Informing citizens of the streets that are intended to be developed as arterial and collector
thoroughfares,so that private land use decisions can anticipate which streets will become major traffic
facilities in the future;
• Providing information on thoroughfare improvement needs which can be used to determine priorities
and schedules in the city's capital improvement program and capital budget;and,
a Minimizing the negative impacts of street widening and construction on neighborhood'areas and the
overall community, by recognizing where future improvements may be needed and incorporating
thoroughfare needs in the city's comprehensive planning process.
The Thoroughfares section includes street classifications and cross-sections to describe the ultimate build out
for all roadways within the City of Southlake.This enables the City to acquire necessary right-of-way during the
development process, and it includes recommendations related to roadways to help the City prioritize
investment in transportation projects.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 14;
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
While cross-sections and recommendations in the Thoroughfares section reference pedestrian and bicycle
facilities as part of a complete and integrated system, the emphasis is primarily on mobility for motorized
vehicles. Information related to bicycle or pedestrian facilities are covered in the Active Transportation section
of this master plan.
In the 2019 Citizen Survey, questions were included to assess performance for mobility and infrastructure both
on a broad,strategic level as well as in specific areas such as traffic circulation, roadway maintenance,water and
sewer service, sidewalks and drainage. During this survey, there were several roadway construction projects
underway that may have influenced residents' feelings about mobility; nevertheless, it demonstrates the
importance of mobility within the community. Further, the survey indicates that Southlake has shown
improvement in managing traffic congestion compared to 2019.
How WOULD YOU RATE THE CITY'S PERFORMANCE IN THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: PROVIDING;TRAVEL
CONVENIENCE WITHIN THE CITY? (Q 10)
Figure 54-City Performance:Mobility and Infrastructure
Customer-Level Objective
Excellent
Poor
13%
10%
Very Good
23%
24% 2019
Fair
I I
•
Good
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 15
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
How WELL IS THE CITY PERFORMING IN MEETING
THE NEEDS OF SOUTHLAKE RESIDENTS?
*Managing Traffic Congestion 53%
-
43%
I i
Providing Pedestrian Pathways,Sidewalks,And Trails 32%
2%
*• Responding to Code Enforcement Inquiries/ 19% ■2019
Complaints 27%
Providing Information On Development 17 19%*
211 '
Providing Animal Control Services *.Indicatessignificant ,
19% ' change;aU95%Y.confidence y
X In /
1 15% ^' vel when�2019?resul
Managing Storm-Water Drainage ;,x l" „C �4 ,1 f ar-coma, d ' 017.
Maintaining Local Streets And Roads 8% 1
6% 25 o c `4444.,Providing Senior Services, i15% �� 1�'
Pre arin The Ci For Emer encies Ir s� ��`
P g tY g...�_ .14% r •15 f <
REGIONAL TRENDS
According to the North Central Texas Council of Government's Mobility 2045, the Dallas-Fort Worth area is the
4th largest metropolitan area in the United States and has a population larger than 37 states. Dallas-Fort Worth
represents 30%of Texas'economy and is the sixth largest retail market in the United States. Between 2018 and
2045, the region is expected to experience a 51% increase in population (forecast of 11.2 million'people) and a
47% increase in employment(forecast of 7 million jobs).
With the anticipated level of growth, extending roadways and
adding lanes in existing corridors will not provide enough capacity to
address increased demand. In addition, transportation funding
levels are not expected to increase(and may decrease)in the coming
years. Transportation revenues are declining due to inflation, rising /'
construction costs, and increasing fuel efficiency (resulting in [ I I it
reduced fuel taxes). NCTCOG estimates that $390 billion would be
needed to eliminate the worst levels of congestion in the DFW 2
region through 2045. However,only approximately$136.4 billion in
resources have been identified to fund transportation
improvements; about $51 billion of these resources address
roadway project needs. By 2045, NCTCOG forecasts a 59%increase
in average travel time in congested conditions (compared to 41% in 2018). In order to address increasing
16
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035]
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
congestion,,the Mobility 2045 emphasizes programs and projects aimed at eliminating or reducing vehicle trips
and utilizing the capacity of the existing transportation system to its fullest.
Mobility 2045 Goals:
• Improve the availability of transportation options for people and goods.
• Support travel efficiency measures and system enhancements targeted at congestion reduction and
management.
• Ensure all communities are provided access to the regional transportation system and the planning
process.
• Preserve and enhance the natural environment, improve air quality, and promote active lifestyles.
• Encourage livable communities which support sustainability and economic vitality.
• Ensure adequate maintenance and enhance the safety and reliability of the existing transportation system:
• Pursue long-term sustainable revenue sources to address regional transportation system needs.
• Provide for timely project planning and implementation.
• Develop cost-effective projects and programs aimed at reducing the costs associated with constructing;
operating, and maintaining the regional transportation system.
FUNCTIONAL ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS
Southlake has adopted the Federal Highway Administration Y;
(FHWA) functional roadway classifications, which groups
roadways into classes, or systems, according to the character .. ..
of the traffic service that they are intended to provide. This •
5
functional classification system then provides a framework for
the design standards for specific roadway cross sections. �`
The FHWA functional classification system of roadways groups --
all streets into one of the three highway functional
classifications listed below,depending on the character of the
traffic and the degree of land access allowed. The
classifications range from arterials,which are meant for higher
speed, longer distance, larger volume travel, unhindered by
local access, to local streets, which carry smaller volumes at
lower speeds, and are intended to feed other streets. In -
between arterials and local streets are collector streets. A
collector street collects traffic from local streets and feeds the '
arterial system. f ; a
� r'1 y e•,ti . 'i
•
The City of Southlake also uses a fourth roadway classification
for State Highway 114. Freeways are limited access arterials • '" „ k,
that are uniquely designed for higher speeds. As such, State
Highway 114 provides Southlake residents a fast and easy r
connection to otherwise distant areas of the Metroplex. rT-=--�— = �-
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 17
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Proportion of Service Functional
Classification Service Provided
Provides the highest level of service at the greatest speed for
ti Arterial the longest uninterrupted distance with some degree of access
control.
IIIIIIIIIIIIZ
o Provides a less highly developed level of service!at a lower
Collector speed for shorter distances by collecting traffic from local roads
and connecting them with arterials.
lantl Access Consists of all roads not defined as arterials or collectors;
1',, - . s Local primarily providing access to land with little or no through
movement.
Freeways
A freeway is a controlled access major arterial designed to carry Freeway
high volumes of through traffic. Access to and from the freeway Arterial
is allowed at ramps and interchanges. These facilities are T . - ;Collector and
designed topermit high-speed merging and diverging maneuvers Through Distributor '
g g P g g g g Traffic
with minimum disruption to the mainline traffic. Freeways have Movement Local
and Speed
maximum traffic carrying capacity but minimum access to
adjacent property. Traffic capacities are generally from 60,000 Access to Property ->
to 200,000 vehicles per day (vpd). Freeways generally serve
inter-regional as well as local trips. They are ordinarily designed s `Y "' '"'" "
and constructed by the Texas Department of Transportation = �`-�r
(TxDOT).
Freeways connect major activity centers in a metropolitan
region. Intersections are completely grade separated and there -='--/—':____._____ ___ ,.-- ---- -- -
is no pedestrian or bicycle access. Buildings are not oriented - =`-r,-
directly to the freeway, however,they may be oriented towards - - _ ' <
the highway access roads. Some elements of parkway design __ -- _- _ - - ._-
are to be incorporated in the freeway design. - ______ -._
S.H. 114 in the City of Southlake is the only roadway that would ., -i _/
qualify as a freeway. Significant urban design E�. w ,, ,i1•
recommendations,including highway landscaping,treatment of 6, ` N.
, #''/ r�, i
overpasses,andportal designs for S.H. 14 are discussed further �,,
P g �'
in the Urban Design Plan. ' , �-
n':':-2.•,-.,474/"2:7.5.'"-4 --, ---,1,_----44.—r
._-...=,..„, -
Freeway frontage roads provide a means of connecting the local , 4: • -N.,,, '_- .e -
ji
arterials to the freeways and providecontrolled `"�� "' �' . -'\' '`"m�y access to ' - - f -,
adjacent property. On frontage roads, trip length is generally .° - - --
less than one mile.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 181
1
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Arterial Streets
Arterials are designed to provide a high degree of mobility and
generally serve longer vehicle trips to, from, and within urban
areas. The arterial system interconnects major urban elements
_ � ,. • — such as the Central Business District, industrial facilities, large
^..�3 '�, _ urban and suburban commercial centers, major residential
areas, and other key activity centers.
Increased mobility, or the movement of people and goods,
rather than access to adjacent land uses,is the primary function
of an arterial street. Arterial streets serve a citywide function
Southiake Boulevard(FM 1709) and are, therefore, designated using a broader citywide
perspective. Arterials are not planned on a neighborhood level
since the result would be discontinuity and a breakdown in the
street's citywide or regional function.
7. -1-77
4 _ Posted speed limits on arterial facilities generally range
between 35 and 50 mph, varying based on the type of area
being served. Arterial streets through compact central business
•
districts accommodate the lower end of the speed range,while
• ` ` " higher speeds are found on facilities in outlying areas. Traffic
4-� = 3 _ t , .' volume and capacity of an arterial street are dependent,in part,
Rondol Mill Avenue(FM 1938) on the number of through and turning lanes, signalization, the
number of driveways and access points, and the volume of bus
and truck traffic. The volumes and capacity of arterials can range from 10,000 vehicles per day on a two-lane
arterial to 75,000 vehicles on a six-lane arterial.
With an emphasis on mobility, an arterial facility is generally designed to accommodate vehicle trips in the foram
of passenger cars and trucks. Pedestrian facilities and,when possible, bicycle facilities should be integrated into
the design of these roadways.
Arterial Street Designation Criteria
The criteria for arterial street classification are a combination of quantitative and subjective measures that
are applied to both existing and future characteristics of arterial streets. Not all of the criteria need to be
met in designating an arterial street,and some criteria carry more weight than others.The following criteria
are listed in order of relative importance or weight:
• Consists of a grid of streets generally spaced at 1 to 1.5 mile intervals;
• Serves as a significant street citywide,accommodating trips of 2-5 miles between destinations;
• Provides connectivity between other arterials and collectors;
• Provides connectivity between or to freeway interchanges;
• Accommodates existing or future average daily traffic volumes of 10,000-75,000 (individual segments
may accommodate lower volumes);
• Provides significant restrictions on driveways and other access points to adjacent land uses;
• Operates and is designated as an arterial street in adjacent jurisdictions;
• Generally accommodates speeds of 30 mph or greater;
• Provides traffic signals at major intersections and driveways as warranted; and
• May accommodate 4 or more travel lanes.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 19
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Collector Streets
Collectors are designed to provide a greater balance between .% y
rim � ..., tira
mobility and land access within residential, commercial, and ' tr �sr;- ti,6`' ,.; \` `
industrial areas. The makeup of a collector facility is largely ;o• `,; 1,
dependent upon the density, size, and type of abutting . ..- t°
developments. Posted speed limits on collector facilities • ,, w k
generally range between 30 and 40 mph. Traffic volume and _
capacity can range from 1,000 vehicles per day on a two-lane _ A ` —_:_ Da ZI
facility up to 10,000 vehicles per day on larger multi-lane =�— `
facilities.
— - _•v- ,
Emphasizing balance between mobility and access, a collector Johnson Road
facility is designed to better accommodate bicycle and �a 4,' r .�� , loiv a y- ; �',
pedestrian activity while serving the needs of motorists. ;,� ,`° t��6. -•-p " -
L T ,
Rural roads are collectors that have a unique rural identity and „:a.. .--,'' .'#gy p j; l
should be prioritized for preservation. These are typically 2-lane j:,;. • :i_tis==• ,
roadways with limited pedestrian/bicycle access, unimproved r• 1ilp- •
. +'•' !
shoulders, and adjoining low-intensity residential or rural land --
uses. - - - �- -1 -
Most rural roads in Southlake have mature trees or rolling -
pastures along the roadway. Where these streets need to s '
accommodate more traffic, improvements shall be limited to Continental Boulevard '
addition of turn lanes at key intersections to address critical I
capacity needs. Flat curbs and surface drainage may be acceptable along most rural roads.; Appropriate
adjoining land use categories include low-density residential and rural conservation.
I
Collector Street Designation Criteria
The criteria for collector streets are a combination of quantitative and subjective measures that are applied
to both existing and future characteristics of collector streets. Not all of the criteria need to be met in
designating a collector street, and some criteria carry more weight than others. The following criteria are
listed in order of relative importance or weight: j
• Serves as a locally significant street (accommodates trips of less than 2 miles distance between
neighborhoods, or between destinations within the city); E j
• Provides connectivity between arterials (e.g. connects parallel north-south or east-west arterials) or
between other collectors; i
• Provides connectivity between important neighborhood activity centers such as commercial areas,
schools, parks, and residential neighborhoods;
• Accommodates existing or future average daily traffic volumes of 10,000 or less (individual segments
may accommodate slightly higher);
• Operates as and is designated as a collector street in adjacent jurisdictions;
• Accommodates speeds of 30 mph or greater;
• Provides limited restrictions on driveways and other access points to adjacent land uses; and
• Provides no more than 2 travel lanes. ,
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 201
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Local Streets
The design features of local facilities are influenced less by traffic volumes and are tailored more to providing
local access and community livability. Mobility on local facilities is typically incidental and involves relatively
short trips at lower speeds to and from collector facilities.
Because of their"neighborhood" nature,travel speeds are generally lower than collectors and arterials. Posted
speed limits on local streets should generally range between
20 and 30 mph, depending on available right-of-way and the '
adjacent land uses. Traffic volumes on local streets are
generally less than 5,000 vehicles per day, and also vary
depending on available right-of-way and the adjacent land
uses. ;,' r, - .
Pedestrian and bicycle safety and aesthetics are generally high ` " '�Y �9`''
'.. I AWN' . , T* li•
priorities on local streets in residential and commercial areas. + ,+:: -.i.!,"�, ;x--ice ,
Wider travel lanes and broader turning radii to accommodate ''' '''',..-2 �o - -
larger vehicle size are important considerations on local •-_-_,:_r
streets in industrial areas. ` '
1
Typical Residential Street!
These streets provide primary access to adjoining commercial,
industrial, and residential properties. They are typically 2
lanes, but may be up to 4 lanes with appropriate turn lanes. '
They are designed for low-speeds, and they accommodate
pedestrian and bicycle access. On-street parking may be �'
appropriate at some locations. Local streets in industrial areas ,�:; �"" --
shall have appropriate accommodation for truck traffic, but
=-'2 ' . 1.
proper screening and site design should be used to minimize ,
the impact of off-street surface parking facilities on the — • _ - -- -
adjacent roadway. f =
Main Streets are designed to be "destination" streets, and -
they function as centers of civic, social, and commercial Typical Main Street '
activity. Main Streets are designed to provide the highest
level of comfort, security and access for pedestrians. Developments along these streets are dense and focused
toward the pedestrian realm. Buildings are generally pulled to the edge of the right-of-way with'no or shallow
setbacks.
Land uses on Main Streets are typically mixed and are generators and attractors of pedestrian activity. Because
of their specialized function and context, Main Streets will represent a relatively small portion of the City's
overall street network. Such streets are appropriate in the Town Center and Employment Center-1 land use
categories.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 21
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] ; Mobility Master Plan
STREET DESIGN STANDARDS
The following cross sections detail the ultimate build-out for each configuration of the functional classification
system. These cross sections are recommendations only and specific site and context conditions may warrant
changes to the sections. However,establishing street design standards assists the City in acquiring needed right-
of-way and in achieving locally-appropriate urban design and establishing a distinct image forthe Southlake.See
the Recommended Roadway Network Map (Master Thoroughfare Plan) on page 29 to view the designation for
public rights-of-way within the City.
::
" ®
IP . _Liiq�a 1 m •
_
Freeway Arterials Collector Local
Freeway ! A6D C2U Main Street
300'-500' ROW 124'-130'-140' ROW : 60'-70'-84'ROW 50'-60' ROW
- 6 lane divided 2 lane undivided { 2 lane undivided � i
_ _ ASU -_- --- _--'� - __ _. __ ___ Commercial/Residential
80'-90' ROW 50'-60' ROW
5 lane undivided 2-4 lane divided/undivided
A4D ;I 1 V;;'
88'-100' ROW 11
4 lane divided 1
70' ROW
3 lane undivided
, A2U ==-gip
88' ROW i
2 lane undivided li
Freeway
Right-of-Way 300'-500'
Type 6-lane divided freeway with 3-lane frontage road in both directions
Design Speed 1 Freeway:50-70 mph _I Frontage Roads:40 mph _ i
Minimum Lane Width ! 12' —
• Design Characteristics ' • Limited access to and from the freeway, L �_—_View of S.H.114
allowed only at ramps and interchanges. -1
• Intersections are completely grade i I
separated.
• No direct pedestrian or bicycle access.
Recommended 8'sidewalk parallel to , „ ,
webfrontage-roads. P. s A
■ No parking permitted. , ,.., `�--
■ Buildings are not oriented directly toward -
the freeway,however,they may be I .? a
oriented toward the frontage roads.
' y11� 11
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 22
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Freeway Cross Section
1
11.1
MEI I I
I I _ I Mil
Arterial—A6D
Right-of-Way 124'-130'-140'
Type 6-lane divided arterial
Design Speed 45-50 mph
Minimum Lane Width 11' -
Design Characteristics ■ Limited driveway access to improve mobility.
• Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees,as allowed by TxDOT.
• Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-10'pathways on both sides of the street.
• Recommended for pathways to be multi-use.
• Recommended pavement treatment and crosswalks at signalized intersections.
• Highly controlled access.Recommended for adjoining uses to share driveways and
provide cross access easements.
• No on-street parking permitted.Minimize the visual impact of off-street parking with
vegetative fences,berms,or relocation of parking to the side or rear of buildings.
• Buildings are set back but provide visual orientation toward the street.
Signalization,as warranted,at major interections.
A6D�Cross'Section
j f
I I I I
Views of'Southlake Boulevard
' i.w? ' 1.1 3
•
},a ' ) t f �j /� i:�
rYp "-�.ESir� ]$al 4
-c—-- -----•--mot' ., il `..k` J • __
.
Ordinance No.1075,-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 23
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Arterial—A5U
Right-of-Way 80'—90'
Type 5-lane undivided arterial
_ _
Design Speed 35-40 mph
Minimum Lane Width 11'
Design Characteristics • Limited driveway access to improve mobility.
• Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees.
• Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-8'pathways on both sides of the street.
• Recommended for pathways to be multi-use to accommodate bicyclists off-street due
to speed differentials.
• Recommended pavement treatment and crosswalks at signalized intersections.
• Highly controlled access.Recommended for adjoining uses to share driveways and
provide cross access easements.
• No on-street parking permitted.Minimize the visual impact of off-street parking with
vegetative fences,berms,or relocation of parking to the side or rear of buildings.
• Buildings are set back but provide visual orientation toward the street.
A5U Cross Section View of North Nolen Drive
r
a
1, 1
- 1 L - ..
Arterial—A4D
i Right-of-Way 88'-100'
Type 4-lane divided arterial
Design Speed 35-40 m_p_h
Minimum Lane Width 11'
- -
Design.Characteristics • Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees. ,
• Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-10'pathway on one side of the street and a '
minimum 4'pathway on the opposite side.
• Recommended for wider pathways to be multi-use to accommodate bicyclists off-
street due to speed differentials.Consider a road diet to reduce width travel lanes and
add on-street bike lanes.
• Recommended crosswalks at 4-way intersections.
• Controlled access due to medians.Recommended for adjoining uses to share driveways '
and provide cross access easements.
• Minimize the visual impact of off-street parking with appropriate screening.
• Buildings are set back but provide orientation toward the street.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 24
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
I A4D Cross Section View of North Kimball.Avenue
y
a L eh 4_-_.ni..: �,-= ,
Arterial—A3U
Right-of-Way 70'. _ __ _ _ - _ - ___
Type 3-lane undivided arterial
Design Speed 30-35 mph
Minimum Lane Width 11'
- __
Design Characteristics • Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees.
• Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-8'pathways on both sides of the street.
• Recommended crosswalks at 4-way intersections. .
• No on-street parking permitted.
• Buildings are set back but provide orientation toward the street.
A3U Cross Section
-
- ._ 99
a• it
i,
Arterial—A2U
Right-of-Way 88'
Type 2-lane undivided arterial
Design Speed 30-35 mph
Minimum,Lane Width 11'
Design Characteristics • Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees.
• Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-10'pathway on one side of the street and a
minimum 4'pathway on the opposite side.
• Recommended for wider pathways to be multi-use.
• Recommended crosswalks at 4-way intersections.
• No on-street parking permitted.
-
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 25
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] ; Mobility Master Plan
• Buildings are set back but provide orientation toward the street. ,
j • This cross-section represents the ultimate build-out,which would require significant
underground drainage improvements.
A2U Cross Section
.r •
i ' a - ''J
H
j
1 Collector—C2U
Right-of-Way 60'-70'-84'
Type 2-lane undivided collector
Design.Speed 30-35 mph
-
Minimum Lane Width 11'
Design Characteristics C2U Cross Section
• Recommended to retain existing natural landscape to the
extent possible.
• Improved pedestrian connectivity with minimum 4'pathways ,
on both sides of the street.
• Recommended crosswalks at 4-way intersections.Consider II Vz ® :� `r`- p
turn-lanes and roundabouts where appropriate. C
• Low access control.
• Typically no on-street parking permitted.
• Narrow lanes conducive to lower-speed traffic.
• Buildings are set back but provide orientation toward the
street.
Typical C2U Streets
i, .t,:,,.,, 'r . ..Jr ,4^,t TUA(r' f. 'tom.. ;.' '�¢v'9tq • E'�d,�� "l Pt
1 4 1.4 e?;74o.r < . t�.,7, "1 7' • /4k-4`.-.�.-- �,.:: w /tit
i.
k • ,.;r •,,.i' a r r*,,a mow, 1,c e . ttl'i'' t " t ....er _-•fd'4.
�*a +• ,4 ,cz ,ii ,iv '•hulk. t 4
1114 t r ,-;
.f; rM 15:,. .a +`j1 ram, ` c
4... q `-r" ``fir`
r �; _-
,.. z ��
Ordinance No..1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 26
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Local Main Street
Right-of-Way 50'-60' i
Jar
Type 2 lane undivided local street
Design Speed 20-25 mph
Minimum Lane Width 10' i
Design Characteristics Main Street Cross Section
• Pedestrian orientation with street trees separating sidewalks jI ,
from the roadway. i
• Improved pedestrian connectivity with 8'-10'sidewalks on {' I
both sides of the street. i! �,rri ' ` Iv t
• Recommended traffic calming and narrow lanes conducive to -- 1, _� 11 �
low speed traffic. �;
• Parallel or angled on-street parking permitted.Minimize the ,
visual impact of off-street parking with vegetative fences,. i t
pedestrian berms,or relocation of parking to the side or rear of buildings. I, I
•' Limited driveway cuts with parking areas accessed from alleys. ` Pi,,it'll I I
• Buildings should be built close to the street and include
scale design features. -' I
Typical Main Streets
itA iY ' . h t
"^.TVA S - 1' - _� ' j� T• _ ,.
--� _ - - _ ,, -, i:a -T:a L IL
I
i
Local Residential/Commercial Street
Right-of-Way 50'-60'
Type 2 lane undivided local street _ - �i
Design Speed 20-25 mph I
Minimum Lane Width 10'
Design Characteristics Residential/Commercial Street Cross Section
• Pedestrian orientation with street trees separating ,_ —
sidewalks from the roadway.
• Improved pedestrian connectivity with minimum 4'
pathways on both sides of the street.
• Recommended traffic calming and narrow lanes conducive
to lower-speed traffic. I Sys( '? , c.,.'t0 r, m•
• On-street parking permitted. I 1 , j _I!_
• Buildings provide orientation toward the street,and may ' II— - Al
be brought to the street,as allowed by zoning j {
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 27
' I
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Typical Residential Street. Typical Commercial Street
.r,h S�i nt� i •�•r fiijf
•
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 28
0
DJ CrOAo`j� CITY OF
m Legend .4ii �- -, r -�eR@S SOUTHLAKE
o t®Freeway(300'-500'ROW) p'r e—`NIP 5'�'Ojr
1-, .�A6D-130'to140'Arterial /114. ..011 kR -•
�A6D-124'Arterial �0: , 4'.r:14 1
in n ■■aa�A5U-84'Artenal Sa�„ - GC. \
C«W,linon d lee SH 114 r. Ill r:
D ..®A4D-100'Arterial hove tOadfromDoveR° �g1 =11 �A
D. mNKrkteedBMlRefer 4,:g,1 1 minim
�■� O �I 1
0 ,aoo m inject MTJO m Ine 2035 14.1 S:i ,■ '"I. •�
1 A4D-94'Arterial MN„y la :�u�► . I O
a te ,1 ./
m ®•sA4D-88'Arterial IAIn��-_wll� F-Q
®A2U-88'Arterial =}~ l 1� Ar_zr'
®.r A3U-70'Arterial - >` i"� I In 2 0 3 5
to Tne mawktom,, ,t. II,�� t y �Uj^»:,.:_fi11
■.C2U-84'Collector "°" ;f Ac ■ Anal
Boulevard Mall,looted 1�' Q-C \■TOigis
0- co Me JeroO Shwas hdct ♦ 1 ��
rD ...C2U-70'Collector sea i'r. � 1 Ai.��' �.a'� �Cp �7t�:� , in
- g' �1 ■=5 SDI/-4- , -tr,_,t Southlake 2035 Plan
e wNeeaeucledgedr •,., .a��41 i�Q�lrtg ea,,.
- 1 Relam(ree,augdoth the
V •t••C2U-60'Collector �,omamaaremPm. - r u.7 1 ■9�,���r'•�srt'1 C
,t. - , ..�..111 �1 1 YnE,�"' '� aA2uteBlmmdatmR.
N ■■,Common Access Easement _ •.•' .:G�� J : ei :6 IN:,-�>z«',; e I ;revision Improve the reedtay
tt ,"''" , �1•` SIT- ma'A'DIerw Master Thoroughfare Plan I
N `I-ldl iL S �.t;-:arolav�. �v 1.■a . eatremue..nfove siael
'• bnfi i r_-I,S�Au .erm�uure Fk I('���-�,�� G �.'I orange
AB 11'i3iIi11��1DSA.1. real
r G C 11 p "- TIILr la7 •t �. 41.E •tiro llllll - N
,11e anent von seam l« i ,��-� ���� "'iltl .��-,tl um .. ,J --;- J Functional Classification System o
RananMOA,reronnmFM l .S9o't ie r ■ T?' I IIIIr �. u
1MD T0ea ,at» .. r{ V qf, 1 Wit,it, ;r1.44.6 of Roadways
-- �u.IsrF�i it Se isi �S-C. �.�-�{{, ,;a. IIIII1 p ..I;� N'S';
N . ; oral aw � +�■t J '■` S 11.,;; E 1,� � Adopted December 7 2021
C ` =iw i I11174R' .„�[3} _� ■i �41-.a � 4'1 r 0 o Re.. ia. n Ordinance No. 1075C
_1 r f C=C rjOi-•-W,1 het, -•ll aA2,-...l....Nor
_ ■ ,�.�tt�xi.„.'61,1 c mj AYlllslgr, ■7■l' F -pomionmi�.ol=::i
■�--��v■n�� sy� d�r� � Y� � m AtD(eB)merirerrnon
Retain Me dennaon �■ � ILIraa ._ 1Pice',) �uI ... r Lr:. ■. �� trafficomen!
uA C4'�U � 'a
rn dAotontoadmaltBironinAY
_•�y,. pp '�. 1• -ter .�„ .h
Nn nin lee)anew �. aI I:II �,.►,j�, II el ao�T �£��� I{■-lip J1 �.rr,=_rm ■^141"�E t lil 9 ROTES.
keuKmem,on owe sues II tg 1 • ■In■1 ,1 11r■C y' I, • :m�S a'y ! , i ;A
wtammau.aanw g RV'■'i i�d7r `T �,�fll°r, Wm "` o.411 --ate 101,j A124aneromeyeloa..brermaeIwota,
1f a m l .k� 11; ._.,. ■ aI v •
.'r �'It E iwv'e•
akey mlai,ecnon,
ati�it �u �I i!! t 'z nor i h !I 11.2,
L�a I :S' n.:. ErIL 'sll ■nn w
�6C�n .k➢.15>I ; s11 t�—'-� ■ g.V1 \ 1e I Z u� it wThe plat eedlbi,ou«!ammme,ada,awieio
►1I��h a-m ry,�o wut{,'S s a ��i. �■ P �. 1 � �vai n■ _Al�` ®,mTtlec,rasowuakomra.;et,roka�a,
AMId6CItN ." � 1�y�1iVi ! Q11 W► all■.-VoZ r 3 E,. / ore �1' 'J �velet,nt■Proposal,and MarRarough!.e
D(I ■Htll I) t'•-T 'ar'i"A'teittW R ■eal --1 i" 52 w.l '•'Ja .- rt i id ■ naaedrredets Ream see Ms eccopanyvp
t. .P '11 ilall-�" lr� aGiu�•�'+�"� •� nal ►7..1 q-r'=••! � °. - • � le ,� I ret�ws.w:koxouw.rl«adda.nawmemon
III III aa� d �i 1 $... .a Ili V.-.
'r ■ v.s_,. ;pi: 1 1 y S s: L- o 1 s'�'R ,igdlulllnnry9.o�y [#! • ,.•"".'"*rite
. "1' Frp V), l..le' • 1 '3 T■lay f Th,pate.a oplay stateamrenaMTne depa
rill I Y 4 V 1 1 3 � ore ���.�J .t3�$ C-
s y t "i �Y . + i tl ��Ar�i 1,+1 Qa, �, J samvake mesaonenaavovnceen mno
1! 1255,R is s 'tI A tl igrt••• t a l...a olirtr0,r llll�M yl '' - ., amwo,mweyMesew«ewemegmar®,w,m
i�'SIII,f" , � Y O aa7t.I l ma' 1 IP��r PI
Im.,..Jm)I gTSI. re . s�, ••,4 la lmand min av««matery m.ntn ROW"
_�1 III��II��Bi' ;`� t e� �r,�''litt fttili'��1�`4�.r �� ,`�(�`li � ��_ � i � � I mreaerea r«iro,e rave,
m • _ �, 5 ,' yo .. �ti,,,,`,- r „lmi& 4.Flit l e`'. 01wi,r -
ra4 S'sin t� a :, .` 'WO 1 rr{w_ej.. ft�a■a rf'' n slue tr.. 1 _ �:n,., -
II== % �}--■i' !. 'c3. ��'- �`.y„ �� Z ''.S rt'rHt'il iiC ,�_ , �.i�■1■
11
....irwl lII .Y-t� i1 $'t C li rE��grallR 7 t +1 t �,1�Hr''.i... a •
:pun,
t-• gol 1'. I,= i ?I- ' ko �4r s ,;,% Firm r . ' ?�st e`vE t?'4 L'. �I �� ■� '� -il
,.
•Slfn r �>, a a� � � .� yll 1 �l -,_..emuh 'I,`�,.�. /�r '*vsA S�•n.- A' "�'r�' eL1.E---L�_:'eS r•,j... � `.�
.. :�IJ s:H ;�� JJBIy'e:s.7=1";.; r, ;.i =�'�Ls�?:ijc 'i :"I:j.... TIll ti • . r i • °-+'{ r te- .i.-I e,11 RIF r'■1 1li
a dim Sr--41iv��*.:..�fl 1:3.�.'ijltel: ;G' IIS I?�jltt�t_"'�1�P hiY .Ei'3.$4- S_- p
1i �:iii �■�-`■y l fki,Lit t vT�s sl+tal 1�' J^I 9 1. �Ft �val„■® - c«mona�„Emeren
-- la:lllt I♦L 3rafili k{' t rcg nE •ash ry �S 8� I�1m bT tl�1J j! N
x .rr3�u Jr�ak-gip. ti. m O
R .y,S - '' i[' 'q ^i R1 '�e EE: t r 1.� unee Ndma on Fmmtr
M.P. � to s ry ■s" 6 .�zi ' � t• a{ kC . 1 m:L�iir r 3 � yI � e � Addition"
,ir1'*,E41 t _'- :;. F Jt ll_,� Ci i w ,_:,� W I: Scale-1:54000 ac
.,.WWWWatsWom... if110:141 inch=4500 feet
NP141: L e.r .Ail `iI..P,t,n... b
u.suuivue in e,nw, t ,„„...� ,� Please ra«maamnce s •1
1rt
ru r.ec,p c.mt.m.q.0 e. , Ho.AM/g grader Dovein o for Fp
..w..r.s....y.t•,�n., PmowrelermRoonamn ' sodnva�acm,errkte 4,500 2,250 0 4,500 Feet -,
N ::,om:c d m Pau NZ02.0na 1 forks`g1Roedwe, MI 1:0
ko a
a
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan ,
INTERSECTION STUDIES
The City strives for a level of service (LOS) of C or
better at each of its major intersections, which k `'''•=: ''
means an average vehicle control delay of 20-35 , -
seconds at signalized intersections or 15-25
seconds at unsignalized intersections. `'id 4'; -;
As new development occurs and traffic volumes
increase, the level of service deteriorates. — — / -T
Multiple options may be available at these
intersections to achieve the desired level of ,,,�,
service, and studies determine which . --- + ti ,;
improvements will be most effective and efficient '''''''.7- -.. ----- - r~r" -
In an effort to address the number one gap issue SH 114 and Dove Road
from the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey,
"Manage Traffic Congestion," the City contracted
with Kimley-Horn to perform a traffic analysis for
various key intersections throughout the City in
2016. t' a�'` "W
The study entailed the engineering firm �.4 ; 6 � - ''""\ !a,"
performing site inspections at key intersections ' 7:- - r=` -`� . - s>
during the AM and PM peak traffic periods to ' " , ;_ � tLI , +* s_•.;R _ -- _-
observe traffic conditions such as sight distance - _
constraints, intersection operations and -- --�
geometry,ry, excessive queuing, and crosswalk
locations. Following the site inspections, the - 1
engineering firm conducted a traffic analysis on 5 White Chapel Boulevard and Continental Boulevard
the intersections which included traffic computer
modeling and traffic signal warrant analysis. Based on the work described above, the engineering firm made
traffic improvement recommendations for each of the intersections studied. Examples of the recommendations
include adding additional turn lanes, signal retiming, improved crosswalks, better signage and adding
roundabouts.
I
In addition,the installation of traffic signals may be an appropriate solution in some locations. However, due Ito
the expense for installing and maintaining signals, all signals must meet and be prioritized based on warraint
studies.The following should be considered prior to signalization:
1) Warrant Study
2) Construction
3) Maintenance/Technician Service
The following map and table show the intersections studied. The complete list of recommendations from the
study, including 2021 updates, are included in the Appendix.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 30,
1
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] ; Mobility Master Plan 1
Intersection Capacity Analysis Map
�_ _ , n `'' f@ � �7 �r Legend
_ '� ,J }
•�,, r 1 5dgnaBZntl Incan"scllan hi clime praalaroty
` Jti1 ` - p * RAW)3ignulknd Uwawctlnn
f '._J • Y\ , 4 Study Area IntersvcRfcns
-
�y' ". � -�;1.�•"1'l,� ' ~+4-/.. •. Irrmg-Er*. 1,4•a. - • Sopn�zea leda.,w�rin 1
�tl A
, . ' I. 3.:-• a ,s___ .c.,... :,,z...76.,:.., . . 1 _ ._ .
, ,
c--n r-' --4 -a,
h ' ' 4 _ I. LZ— -1
' , I -` mot,''' x l k- / rs
' J , h' t"— �lsw -44
•
1 - r i Jf s ��� f
I", - .ti"•Jr-i" -rr1�''� l'`',j, e 4 +1 .> '1 ,#. , '*_ ""` _- c r'm -,,r;cr
r �
1-- i L `';1-f r�
_ _ z j cmisnnontalC7u^1 —F3- Ail v
L '�, ,gi g r' i�.•, �.z.4 AP. lut l+--,
+ 4y`.__4":. ;4 F.• 4.1.. ..- — '`4
Intersections Studied
1 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Pearson 16 Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Road
Lane 1
2 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 17 Kimball Avenue and Village Center Drive
Watermere Drive/Jellico Circle (Two-way Stop Controlled)
3 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Davis 18 Dove Road and Peytonville Avenue
Boulevard / Randol Mill Avenue (FM 1938)
4 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 19 Dove Road and Shady Oaks Drive
Peytonville Avenue (Northbound Stop Controlled) : j
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and
5 Southridge Lakes Parkway/Waterford Drive 20 Dove Road and White Chapel Boulevard
Peytonville Avenue/Southridge Lakes j
6 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady 21 Parkway and Peytonville Avenue/ Raven
Oaks Drive Bend Court
(All Way Stop Controlled)
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and White Shady Oaks Drive and Highland Street/
7
Chapel Boulevard 22 Turnberry Lane
(All Way Stop Controlled)
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 311
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Carroll Avenue and Highland Street/
8 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 23 Kirkwood Boulevard
Diamond Boulevard / Byron Nelson Parkway
(Two-way Stop Controlled)
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Tower Continental Boulevard and Davis Boulevard
9 24
Blvd (FM 1938)
10 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Carroll 25 Avenue
Boulevard and Peytonville
Avenue
(All Way Stop Controlled)
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Central Continental Boulevard and White Chapel
11 26
Avenue Boulevard
12 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Village 27 ParkwayContinental Boulevard and Byron Nelson
Center Drive
(All Way Stop Controlled)
13 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Kimball 28 Continental Boulevard and Carroll Avenue'
Avenue
14 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Nolen 29 Continental Boulevard and Kimball Avenue
Drive
15 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 30 SH 114 Eastbound Frontage Road and State
Commerce St/Gateway Drive St.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 32
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
Beyond the posted speed limit,the design of a street affects !—*r.7%-,7ser.
the typical speed at which a motorist will feel comfortable
.r
driving.Traffic calming measures can reduce the travel speed
on certain ROW to levels that are appropriate to the
functional classification and adjacent land use. By slowing
traffic, eliminating conflicting movements, and sharpening ;,.•
drivers' attention, traffic calming may result in fewer
collisions. And, because of lower speeds, when collisions do "at �" •?,occur,they may be less serious. J
According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), �'� ' '� A f
reducing speed and lowering the volume of traffic on ' - ,r-- •-
appropriate streets have been shown to have a number of
positive impacts:
- I
• Improved pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
• Decreased traffic noise.
• Improved neighborhood cohesion and livability.
• Improved property values. Intersection Treatment
• Improved street aesthetics and appearance.
Traffic-calming techniques may also affect the following:
• Crime reduction:Traffic calming encourages natural
surveillance and access control.
• Quality of street life: Lower speeds and volumes
after traffic calmingencourage walking, bicycling, — ' `
g g, Y g. fl, 3.,r .
and street life. : '�-%
If � i "� '•��'` fit
Various types of traffic calming measures have been a a g
researched and recommended bythe FHWA. Each maybe _= ` .l
appropriate under specific circumstances. Southlake has
utilized medians, roundabouts, curb extensions, and corner .- .
radius treatments, but others may help to calm traffic near �
schools or parks, in neighborhoods or in certain commercial ~- -
areas with high volumes of pedestrian or bike traffic.
As traffic calming is considered, it is also important to -�'
consider potential impacts on emergency personnel and Roundabout
response times. Southlake could consider applying a combination of the following traffic calming measures in
appropriate locations:
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 33
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Medians
Medians are islands located along the roadway -
centerline, separating opposing directions of traffic
movement. Medians can provide special facilities to
accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists, especially at
crossings of major roadways.
•
Medians are most valuable on major,multilane roads that
present safety problems for bicyclists and pedestrians . '
wishing to cross. The minimum central refuge width for
safe use by those with wheelchairs, bicycles, etc., is 5.2 - r `'t(*i'
feet to 6.6 feet. Introducing color or texture changes to
the road surface material around the refuge area reminds
motorists to reduce speed. -
Used in isolation, roadway medians do not have a
significant impact in reducing vehicle speeds. For the purpose of slowing traffic, medians are generally used in
conjunction with other devices such as curb extensions or roadway lane narrowing.
Curb or midblock extensions
The sidewalk and/or landscaped area on one or both sides of the road is extended to reduce the roadway to a
single lane or minimum-width double lane. By reducing crossing distances, sidewalk widening can be used to
make pedestrian movement easier and safer.
They can be installed either at intersections or midblock,and they may be used in conjunction with other traffic-
calming devices, but they cannot impede or restrict the operation of the roadway. Narrowing certain streets
with curb extensions can create safer bicycle facilities, but care should be taken that bicyclists are not squeezed
by overtaking vehicles where the road narrows.
Corner-radius treatments
Corner radii of intersection curbs are reduced, forcing turning vehicles to slow down. Efforts to accommodate
trucks and other large vehicles have historically led to increased corner radii at intersections. To slow traffic, a
corner radius of approximately 7 feet is recommended.
The sharper turns that result from the reduced radii require motorists to reduce speed, increasing the time
available to detect and take appropriate actions related to pedestrians at the crossing.Smaller radii also provide
more pedestrian storage space, and pedestrians are more visible to drivers. Corner treatments may result in
wide swings in turning movements of large vehicles, large vehicles hitting and damaging curbs or, endangering
pedestrians on corners,or affect response times for emergency vehicles. Locations for these treatments should
therefore be carefully considered.
Roundabouts
Roundabouts are circular intersections that allow for a continuous flow of traffic in one direction around a center
island. Roundabouts are intended to slow the speed and maintain efficiency at an intersection.They have been
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 34
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
proven to improve safety, reduce collisions, and reduce the injuries or impacts of collisions. Roundabouts in
Southlake have been used at key intersections along arterials or collectors, and they provide opportunities for
prominent landscaping and art to enhance the public realm.
Traffic Circles
1, /,%�%�" kKN.r,- Smaller traffic circles,with center islands approximately 13 feet in diameter,can be
' r. ti f - JC 1-4 I safer for both vehicles and pedestrians, reducing vehicle speeds.Traffic circles can
-- -e- .. reduce crashes by 50 to 90 percent when compared to two-way and four-way stop
U - signs and other traffic signs, reducing the number of conflict points at intersections.
� ) Success, however, depends on the central island being sufficiently visible and the
''`�`c_______ approach lanes engineered to deflect vehicles, preventing overrun ofthe island.
Pavement Treatments/Intersection Treatments
Textured pavement treatments provide visual and audible cues for drivers to encourage traffic calming.The use
of paving materials such as brick, cobbles, concrete pavers, or other materials that create variation in color and
texture reinforces the identity of an area as a traffic-restricted zone.Colors and textures that contrast with those
prevailing along the roadway alert motorists to particular conditions, and increase bicyclist and pedestrian
visibility.
Treatments can be an attractive element along residential streets.The variation from asphalt or concrete paving
can signify crossing into a residential zone where pedestrians and bicyclists can be expected to have greater
priority.
Pavement treatments can be combined with other traffic-calming devices to provide an entry or gateway into
a neighborhood or other district. Surface alterations at intersections with local streets can include textured
paving, pavement inserts,or concrete, brick,or stone materials.Curb extensions can also be placed at entrances
to neighborhood areas, usually where a residential street intersects an arterial. The extension can discourage
vehicular traffic from cutting through the neighborhood.
The choice of materials should not pose a danger or deterrent to bicyclists or persons with disabilities. Cobbles
present special difficulties, particularly for vehicles with narrow wheels or without suspension. Similarly, pavers
with chamfered edges can impair a bicyclist's stability.
Raised Crosswalks/Intersections
A raised crosswalk is a broad, flat-topped speed hump that coincides with pedestrian crosswalks at street
intersections. Raised above the level of the roadway to slow traffic, it enhances crosswalk visibility and makes
the crossing easier for pedestrians who may have difficulty stepping up and down curbs. It must be stable and
firm and can be constructed of brick, concrete block, colored asphalt, or cement, with ramps striped for better
visibility.
A raised intersection is a plateau across the entire intersection, with a ramp on each approach. It can be
enhanced through the use of distinctive surfacing such as pavement coloring, brickwork,or other pavements. In
some cases, the distinction between roadway and sidewalk surfaces is blurred. If this is done, physical
obstructions such as bollards or planters should be considered, restricting vehicular access.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 35
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Ramps should not exceed a maximum gradient of 16 percent. Distinctive surfacing materials should be skid—
resistant, particularly on inclines. Ramps should be clearly marked to enable bicyclists to identify and anticipate
them, particularly under conditions of poor visibility. And care must be taken so the visually impaired have
adequate cues to identify the roadway's location (e.g., tactile strips). Color contrasts will aid those who are
partially sighted.
Curvilinear Roads
New roads can be designed to meander or turn sharply to slow traffic, limit views, and discourage speeding.
Designs for new curvilinear roads should be careful to consider adequate access to adjacent properties, both in
terms of servicing and the needs of the individual.
Landscaping and Urban Design
With the adoption of the Major Corridors Urban Design Plan, Southlake recognized the 'r
opportunities and importance of placemaking along the City's boulevards, entry points,
and freeway interchanges. While roadside landscaping and urban design elements . 1E-- • '
improve aesthetics and visitors' impressions of the community, they can also have a
positive influence on driver behavior and may improve roadway safety. A pleasing
roadside landscape can reduce driver stress levels, which may reduce occurrences of _
aggressive or unsafe driving. In addition, street trees may encourage motorists to drive _
more slowly, which in turn may result in fewer crashes and less severe injuries when 1
crashes do occur.'
i a rr,Np+
'7.4
'A.Wit A I '� • u • pl w
3 a� r 13 �e rf e r i 't r
4SG�n' v r RVIfir
i', fit_ r a 't e (+l - >
If fft ,''- YK i.r r
-.16 -
-
'kt-444,41$
'Wolf, K.L.2010. Safe Streets—A Literature Review. In:Green Cities:Good Health(www.greenhealth.washington.edu),.
College of the Environment, University of Washington.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 36
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS
The City has selected a standard for overhead street lighting along
arterials.Adequate street lighting is normally provided in accordance
with standard engineering practice when arterial . streets are
i- constructed or improved. Adequate arterial street lighting is defined
r by the American Association of State Transportation Officials
_ f (AASHTO) as providing average minimum 0.8 foot-candle
illumination or average desired 1.0 foot-candle average illumination
on the pavement.
In addition to the standards defined by AASHTO,jthe City of
Southlake lighting ordinance(Ordinance 693-C)limits the intensity of
lighting to 0.2 foot-candle average illumination as measured at the property line in areas with single or two-
family residential adjacency. The City and other governmental agencies are exempt from the lighting ordinance
when installing lighting for safety or traffic control purposes, but City staff has used this as a guiding standard
and endeavored not to unnecessarily exceed this threshold when possible.
Generally, arterials and collectors will be lit to a higher standard than typical local neighborhood streets. All
arterial street projects should include street lighting when they are constructed to recommended Thoroughfare
Plan standards. A street lighting standard will establish a functionally and aesthetically consistent light fixture
throughout the city.
The following items are important considerations in selecting standard lighting fixtures:
• AASHTO Criteria for Arterial Street Lighting Coverage
o Desirable 1-foot candle average light
o Minimum 0.8—foot candle average light
• City of Southlake Lighting Ordinance
o (Arterial Street Lights are exempt)
o 0.2 foot candle average at residential property line
• Residential Adjacency
• Electric Utility Standard Menus
The following standards have been established to achieve adequate lighting levels between the 0.8:and 1.0 foot-
candle standard, without unnecessarily exceeding the 0.2 foot-candle standard at the residential property line
called for in our lighting ordinance.
Standard type and appearance:
• Gullwing or Shoebox fixtures
• 30'median mounted painted steel pole
• Dual fixtures
• 250 watt high pressure sodium or LED lights as available
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 37
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Gullwing
This type of lighting source is similar to Southlake Town Center parking lot lighting, the primary light source is
inexpensive, it minimizes potential for "hotspots" and has been used along Kirkwood Boulevard, Grace Lane,
and Blessed Way.
Lighting Coverage `1-foot candle light average - - j
Pole height
Spacing ' 150-250'=
Wattage 400 W(HPS) I
Available through Tri-County. Retail, V 1y
Installation and Electric Provider will install for
Maintenance ; additional cost and maintain at no
additional cost.
s
Service Costs City is responsible
The lighting footprint of the "Gullwing" is slightly above the 0.2 foot-candle limit at the right of way line on a
standard width arterial street, but has a pronounced bulge that will exceed the 0.2 foot-candle limit and
approach 0.5 foot-candle at the right of way line. Using the "Gullwing" fixture is acceptable on ROWs with no
residential adjacency that would trigger the lighting ordinance limitation. However, most arterials have
residential adjacency that would probably preclude the use of the "Gullwing"fixture.
Shoebox
This type of lighting source is similar to Byron Nelson Parkway street lighting, the primary light source is
inexpensive, it minimizes potential for "hotspots" and has been used along North Kimball Avenue and North
White Chapel Boulevard.
Lighting,Coverage 1-foot candle lightaverage ' "L "�
J ILA V
Pole height 30-40'
Spacing 150-250� r.,
Wattage 400 W(HPS) i r �"
•
Available through Oncor or Tn-1 xA r:! -- '
Installation and County. Retail Electric Provider will �;; ,� s(''Y '°F
Maintenance install and maintain at no capital cost �, 'k.
to the city_ — I. .74 x - '�-,;'`
Service Costs City is responsible �s
This is a standard fixture in the menu of options provided by two local electric providers. Like the "Gullwing"
fixture,the"shoebox"fixture provides adequate lighting on the pavement between 0.8 and 1.0 foot-candles and
slightly exceeds the 0.2 foot-candles at the right of way line, but does not have the bulge produced by the
"Gullwing."
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 38
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
ILLUMINATED STREET SIGNAGE
Illuminated street signage can improve safety for the driving
public by improving the visibility of major intersection
signage. Accordingly, Southlake has installed backlit
intersection signage at major intersections. This type of KIMBALL Ave
signage is appropriate at signalized intersections along - t
TxDOT rights-of-way or other arterials. Illuminated signage
should be included with any future signalized intersections
in the city. -
ACCESS MANAGEMENT
Proper access management will help the city maintain
smooth traffic flow rovide ade uate street drains e ` ' IV r.
ensure that all properties have safe and efficient vehicular --_ -" _- - -
access to or from the public street system and ensure that
public streets have the capacity to handle peak traffic _" i
volumes. • ��,�`� ', -- --— C
•
A driveway ordinance is one tool the city can use to manage r_ ' =i
access along public streets.Generally,such an ordinance can
prohibit the indiscriminate location and spacing of
driveways while maintaining reasonable vehicular access to
and from the public street system; reduce conflicting turning
movements and congestion thereby reducing vehicular accidents; and maintain and enhance a positive image
for the attraction of new, high quality, residential and nonresidential development in the city.
Southlake's existing driveway ordinance was developed in 1995 and it is recommended that the city update the
driveway ordinance to reflect best practices and meet the current needs of residents, businesses and other
property owners.
THOROUGHFARE RECOMMENDATIONS
A number of right of way improvements are recommended in this plan that will assist in ,achieving the
recommended street design standards and help in alleviating specific concerns that may involve that particular
section of roadway.The map on the following page shows the locations for the various recommendations. The
list of recommendations is included in Appendix C.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 39
[
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
MENI,..
, . ...,.
'W....... ,
. . ....
'it -.....
- ...
...
Southlake .,,,,... . . .,
Thoroughfare
. .
:
Recommendations , ,-,-, _ 1,
...
,__..,,J,
I, . ..
.1 -7 .....
• ,,,•
. .:.
Tier 1 lik• - i r ,...;_,,,_ ,,__,__ ,',:?7,.4--
lir '' ..:.:-, ,..N."-=3:77--: '' L' \ •'.',." ' fs.--, i
gla Tier 2 s '., ,,..,;.--
—.a—. ., ,' 1.i- is
0 Tier 3 g-1-------- ) 1 ,-- - :
.1,-----.T •....._ - 3), 1---1-1 i
-',- _:-L.--,--,1. 1----'--
1-------.I '1' -----,,-i -- ..,,-...,--7., ,r.,,). -ru.,,-... . •p.i-:-....--=---,..,,..„rr............1%
m-7 ...:1 1 • ''' , ,.. ....;,,-;,' I:,;-sj .s. .,
Ii 091A'_1--2.±---'''.1'-'•`,-,711 ri', '.. 1, 1. .
f E---- ii.1-1, ---,_t... y I,,...
,- '-.--I
i'..-1.1.'77.7.4...:' '::•'-----i-F'.'1--71: '1 1, .
-,.7',,-.,.-.--'i_--7-,-,...-n.":,,.--..,1',=,.'j\—l!-,,,-,-'.-_-1_;(_1.,r.,"_.--;)1.",,.'.,-,.-.:,,,-1.,._-I_,-•.•.-.•"•-Jf7,,--.!,--•-_-1-,I.=.---i1''1..''11,',--'.1.__.1,-_,__.'-_.7'-'7.--_r-r15-.,;„-1,'`•.--.7.4--.'.-,__4,_ii.1--A J%;'7;._.4-.'111,,1-'..'-'.,':..—,". ..--\,---.l, -,.n.71_.,..-.:,:4.,.-,.„,)-rr-.,,..-...,.J-'---•.•-'.'-,,';,-•-T.-•,r•-'.,'........,,'/,,'":„.I'(1-.•(P,,•','i-r-,.'.;1'''-';-''--''i,T.--r-'i-I•-
•
ri -1 --'
rr1 — -- --=.,.--.--115
...-.--....',,,.
.. ..,,.
.
MIS2 I
ik
1:-4_1, ' I, •
' • ,
,Th,I; ' : 1 ,,- JO'''' " - _J.: ) '..-,---:i "a-i-------- 1,__:.-.--,1 ._.-'••_-__J ' l'-r-1:1'----<1•'. ' , ' !
i.i ,' . ---,..., s_-_-__1,-2'.=',..ji j i.----.1'..:!.,..'.',.'L-,..'-'' ' 1=7 -7- ...•.r. '-ur j---), -).,"--,- - 1 ,
_. :.._.,.____ .-.
'i - -'-1,--1 '--2'..-\''':-.' - -' i ''' ' . - \ -. 1--(':-',2]..",...---I: ,,.,'.".:-1-1 '' • - ' --•---•-- ---1"- '1' i.','t 1— -
i -1,,A .-- 'Z' it`, 7. ,!..1-j dilk_i____ i, _ --i -_-._=' ,,,,r_____._,_J--. 1.4_ ...17,._.L_A ), --,•_...
i- -. \ •1 „/),... 1 •VIII, ;',"• ----17,).-3'-,:i: '•-•,;__ i•1' Allifilk. ..__,--- ..
...
,.--,. 1, .-!..• - i -,--A.,,,..)..,3,•i,1;:;.= iJ. e: • 43,-„--,:‘ -,,•,--,-- ,,L.. ..._...
_,:,., , , ..), /, . , 1,,,..,,,,;„, ,, - a..--....1
,,, , _,-
-,,
. -a i j,. , _,- „_,,,dl„.„-...3.i•_, ,...,,,-;„:„„,?,_J,(g..-.) - - t --n 41-_,;-,-,, • 1,-../14'it,4,,,,,..-... t , , l'. /,:••',, [-,4 40
- -1 , 1!..-1-, ••• uL.i : . ,,,.-, 1. - - ):t-_-Ji.• t• ., ,_-..-1.'it t.4. .ir- ---,..--" .----' ,
-1L----.- ' ' • • •:-f•- ii.-: ''..1, O•..----y co J. .,-.,,,,,1 v-z-;, .)1,, • Aft.c.1,:1-413-.40...„:i 1., .. ,I,
17,-- _1 . —i _,,..! -..1 .; T ,,--. .11 i , I- i 111,,''. ),1%.:.11-,=- I
17 -t112=1... '1 -- - Ir--.1-. ''-•=,-,1117r-1 ..-I,'?':, --7 \' '\ - ., -' 1, "'-'7';17-J1 1 " ' \'• - --1-1 V.
. .1.1:......:..:: .F=-)-----T- ':.4_/' '•_.__- __ _.1.,: ',.-'--41',-,---1_,._..:::-:i'. _,.,-L.,.._±,..„._.j_--,----,-. - • ;#
••
-_-_-.;---)-=7,, .(--7---.37‘,----.1--1,, --17.--"--4J-1'-. ,. -, . . ..•,*
410
1 p -r.,,. '',,,... ';c--- ,....,_J'--,,.
I i tyl, .'2 i'.. . LI
le.., ri,t---v,,,• :-...--- '-j;..,„1--''''11.4 ' ,
1 ,.. • ,..J'i'INV ' t'e" ,
%'.T.J.1-;--.1 . . -"" .* .•r ,„ -,.. -.• ,
.. .4,.., ,,e.m.,4...,. t ,, ....
...,.
.....? t-
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] '. 40
. ,
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
This chapter of the Southlake 2035 Mobility Master Plan addresses active transportation, primarily pedestrian
and bicycle mobility, and serves as the City's Trail System Master Plan. As such, this chapter updates and
consolidates the Sidewalk Plan and the Southlake Pathways Plan. In addition,this chapter expands on previous
plans by providing recommendations for crosswalks. This Plan provides a general overview of active
transportation planning and its history in Southlake and also provides a summary and recommendations for
bicycle facilities,sidewalk facilities, and crosswalks.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Active transporation refers to human-powered modes of travel
— primarily walking and cycling. Active transportation may be
recreational, such as a hike through a park, or utilitarian, such Southlake 2035 Mobility Goal
as a trip to school, work, shopping, or services. The benefits of
active transportation are numerous and include improved "Develop an innovative mobility
public health, a cleaner environment, reduced congestion, system that provides for the safe,
increased social interaction, and improved quality of life. In convenient, efficient movement of
addition, walking and cycling are convenient and economical. people and goods, reduces traffic
According to the 2017 National Household Travel Survey, congestion,promotes energy and
walking and cycling have become more popular. Biking and transportation efficiency and
walking made up 11.5%of all trips in the United States in 2017
compared to 9.5% in 2001 — a 21% increase. Further, many promotes expanded opportunities
destinations in Southlake are desirable to access by bicycle or for citizens to meet some routine
on foot, including parks, schools, community events, and needs by walking or bicycling."
pedestrian-friendly shopping areas like Town Square. For all
these reasons, the City of Southlake and the broader DFW Excerpted from the Southlake 2035
region have placed an increased emphasis on active Vision, Goals& Objectives
transportation in recent years.
HISTORY OF ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IN SOUTHLAKE
Historically, Southlake's growth was automobile-oriented and characterized by large lot single-family
development that was not pedestrian-oriented. This type of development coupled with the City's desire to
maintain its rural character generally resulted in the omission of bike paths and sidewalks for practical and
aesthetic reasons. However, as Southlake has transitioned from a rural community to a suburban city with
numerous pedestrian-friendly destinations,the desire for active transportation options has grown.
Formal emphasis on active transportation first emerged in Southlake in the early 1990s. The 1995 Trail System
Master Plan was the City's first plan to address pedestrian and bicycle mobility on a broad scale. The Plan was
developed in response to a citizen survey conducted in the early 1990s that identified hike and bike trails as
well as nature areas and trails as top priorities. The Plan focused primarily on potential on-street bike routes
and sidewalks adjacent to roadways.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 41
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Six years later,the Plan was updated and the 2001 Southlake Pathways Plan was adopted. This revised plan
expanded the originally proposed trail network to a more comprehensive system which included greenway
paths in future developments as well as additional equestrian and hiking trails.
The Pathways Plan was updated again as part of the 2025 comprehensive plan update (Southlake 2025 Plan)
and the 2005 Southlake Pathways Plan was adopted. During the update process, a need to address gaps in the
existing network as well as connections between recreational trails and destinations was recognized. As a result,
the 2007 Sidewalk Plan was developed and adopted in 2007 as a complement to the Pathways Plan. The
Sidewalk Plan identified planning, policy and implementation areas to provide or improve access to the City's
pedestrian network. Perhaps most significantly, the Sidewalk Plan identified and prioritized sidewalk and trail
infill segments for construction. This prioritization list continues to be used as a starting point on an annual basis
when determining which sidewalks will be constructed through the Capital Improvements Program.
Also during the Southlake 2025 process, recommendations were made to amend relevant 'development
ordinances to require sidewalks for all new development. Those recommendations were implemented in 2006
and 2007. With limited exceptions,all new development must provide sidewalks along city streets.
In 2014, the Southlake 2030 Mobility Master Plan was adopted. This plan updated and consolidated three
comprehensive plan elements:the Sidewalk Plan,the Pathways Plan,and the Mobility and Master,Thoroughfore
Plan.
In addition to plan development and ordinance amendments, the City has worked to improve pedestrian
mobility by pursuing grant funding opportunities and by dedicating approximately $200,000 annually for the
construction of sidewalks.
As evidenced in Southlake's 2019 Citizen Survey, today there continues to be substantial public support and
interest in pedestrian facilities. Sixty-seven percent of survey respondents said"providing pedestrian pathways,
sidewalks, and trails" is "very important", with an additional 24% ranking it "somewhat important". With the
development of this plan, the City is taking an additional step toward achieving a safe, efficient, seamless, and
effective active transportation network.
REGIONAL PLANNING
Beyond city-level planning,the City has also shown it's commitment to active
transportation by engaging in planning at a multi-jurisdictional level and a — —_
regional level. City staff currently participate in the regional-scale NCTCOG >i �
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. The Bicycle and Pedestrian 4/1-
Advisory Committee is organized and supported by the North Central Texas
Council of Governments (NCTCOG)for the 16-county region. The Committee r = `
provides technical expertise, public outreach support, review of regional North Central Texas.
bicycle and pedestrian planning,and assistance in the selection of bicycle and Council of Government [
pedestrian projects funded by the Regional Transportation Council. The —'
Committee generally meets quarterly and the meetings provide an
opportunity for local governments to share best practices, success stories, and discuss common issues in,an
effort to improve local initiatives and enhance regional coordination.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 42
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
MOVING FORWARD
Recommendations for improvements for active transportation generally fall into three categories, Education
and Promotion,Safe Behavior and Enforcement, and Planning and Infrastructure:
Education and Promotion
By teaching pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists to practice safe behavior while out on the 1 City's roads,
sidewalks, and trails, we can create a safer, more welcoming active transportation network. Education and
training increase confidence which translates into a greater number of individuals choosing to utilize active
transportation options.
In addition to providing outreach and education to road and sidewalk users, an often overlooked audience
includes staff and decision makers. This type of program is important for building support of a;wider public
education campaign, increasing understanding of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure needs, and fostering
relationships between the city and other local agencies and groups with an interest in pedestrian and cyclist
safety (schools, hospitals, running/bicycle stores or clubs). Internal education may include but is not limited to
hosting in-house meetings or forums, providing printed educational materials, and organizing "walk/bike the
trail"events where participants walk/run/bike on selected routes.
There are a number of resources available for developing a customized education program for Southlake. A few
resources as well as model community activities are highlighted below.
• National Bicycle Safety Education Resource Center
http://www.bicyclinqinfo.orq/education/resource/fhwa.html
The Federal Highway Administration's National Bicycle Safety Education Resource Center provides;bicycle safety
education information. The website includes a searchable database, a Database Guide that identifies training
needs for different audiences,and a Good Practices Guide that serves as
a resource in planning and developing bicycle safety education programs.
• NCTCOG Bicycle&Pedestrian Safety Education
http://www.nctcoq.orq/trans/sustdev/bikeped/safetyed/
https://www.lookouttexans.orq TEXANS
The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) offers
several publications on bicycle and pedestrian safety that may be BIKE
reproduced and distributed. In addition, NCTCOG launched the Look Out
Texans campaign in 2015,which provides safety tips,educational videos, WALK .
and free bicycle and walking safety school kits for grades 3 through 8. �y
Beyond educational outreach, NCTCOG facilitates regional coordination D IE
for bicycle and pedestrian planning, provides statistics and resources SAFELY
related to active transportation, and promotes National Bike to Work
Week, National Bike to Work Day, and Bike to School Day. 4'
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 43
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
• Federal Highway Administration Pedestrian Safety Campaign
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local rural/pedcampaign/
The Federal Highway Administration offers a Pedestrian Safety Campaign Think of the lmpaat
�kh...You Could Make.,
that includes ready-made outreach materials that communities can STOP FOR PEDESTRIANS
customize and use locally. The website includes materials for use in
television, radio, cinema, and print advertising. The website also includes a
Campaign Planning Step by Step Guide that explains how to implement the
campaign. The purpose of the campaign is to Be Safe.Be Smart.;Be Seen.
1. Sensitize drivers to the fact that pedestrians are legitimate road Make Sure Drivers Can See You.
users and should always be expected on or near the roadway
2. Educate pedestrians about minimizing risks to their safety
3. Develop program materials to explain or enhance the operation of pedestrian facilities, such as
crosswalks and pedestrian signals.
• BikeTexas
www.biketexas.org
BikeTexas is a non-profit organization that works to increase awareness and interest in bicycle access, safety,
and education. BikeTexas organizes bike rides and provides a wealth of information including bicycle related
news, bicycle route maps, and bicycle laws. In addition, BikeTexas offers SafeCyclist Certification Training which
provides teachers, police, and other youth community workers with the skills and curriculum to teach youth
about bicycle and pedestrian safety. The organization also offers a BikeTexas Safe Routes to 1School Event
Manual, which describes how to organize a bike/walk events and provides templates for public service
announcements,press releases,donation requests letters,flyers,as well as event checklists and other materials.
• San Antonio, Texas
The City of San Antonio is one of thirteen Texas communities that has � OMEN �Op�
received "Bicycle Friendly" designation by the League of American 4N�R�� SAN ANTONIO
BIKES
Bicyclists. The City has received this designation not only for their f® EC1 Qgign
provision of bicycle infrastructure,but also for their cycling education and
promotion activities. For example, the City of San Antonio's Office of Sustainability has an outreach campaign
called "Get Cyched" that promotes cycling and educates the community about the rules of the 'road for both
drivers and cyclists. Some of the City's outreach materials have included print ads, bill boards, bumper stickers,
and posters.
In addition,San Antonio has adopted a safe passing ordinance which establishes a minimum passing distance of
3 feet for cars (or 6 feet for commercial or large trucks) when passing vulnerable road users such as bicyclists
when road conditions allow. The City also has a comprehensive website that outlines city bike ordinances,state
bike and pedestrian laws, and provides downloadable "Get Cyched" outreach materials.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 44
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Siclovia, a bi-annual car-free event organized by the YMCA of Greater San Idth
Antonio,further promotes cycling and other forms of active transportation I VI
CI
in San Antonio. Select streets are closed to automobiles for approximately
6 hours on a Sunday to allow residents to bike, walk, run, skateboard, or it h+t C k �_►
participate in other recreational activities without worrying about cars. In
addition,there are Reclovia areas that include free activities such as group SAN ANTONIO'S FAMILY ADVENTURE
exercise classes as well as live music,water stations, and rest areas.
• Austin,Texas
Austin has received Bicycle Friendly designation and is also the only Texas city to achieve Walk Friendly
designation. One reason for this dual designation is Austin's Safe Routes to School Program. This program trains,
hires, and supervises crossing guards for 97 schools and offers education on bicycle, pedestrian, bus and train
safety to daycares, elementary schools, and parent groups in the city. In addition, similar to SanAntonio, the
City of Austin has adopted a Vulnerable Road User's Ordinance, which recommends motorists maintain a
minimum of 3 feet when passing vulnerable road users such as bicyclists and pedestrians.
Other promotion activities that communities have utilized include:
➢ Community rides
➢ Trail maintenance days
➢ 4th of July bike parade
➢ Kids' triathlon
➢ Bicycle fashion show or decoration competition
➢ Providing bicycle and pedestrian safety courses for the general public
➢ Hosting bicycle instructor certification training (such as the SafeCyclist curriculum)
Safe Behavior and Enforcement
While it is important to educate citizens about safe biking, walking, and driving habits, there must be effective
enforcement of the rules of the road. Motorists who exceed the speed limit or fail to stop for pedestrians in
crosswalks should be held accountable for their actions. Likewise, bicyclists and pedestrians that fail to follow
traffic laws should also be held accountable.
Planning and Infrastructure
Planning and Infrastructure includes physical improvements to the City's active transportation network as well
as policy improvements. The following sections address bicycle facilities,sidewalks, and crosswalks.
BICYCLE FACILITIES
Bicycling is an affordable mode of transportation that provides physical activity, produces no pollution, and
supports social interaction. Cycling empowers residents of all ages, including children, by providing a mobility
alternative to the automobile. Unfortunately,Southlake currently lacks a connected system of bicycle trails and
the widespread development of dedicated bicycle lanes is impractical due to right-of-way and funding
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 45
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
constraints. However, improvements can be made to provide a safer cycling environment and a connected
system of bicycle facilities. Bicycle facilities, as defined by the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO), are "improvements and provisions to accommodate or encourage bicycling,
including parking and storage facilities,and shared roadways not specifically defined for bicycle use".
-
Goals for improved bicycle facilities: ` r f "' "*` "j j 1! 4
•
• Improve public safety and reduce opportunities for - N '
injuries on roadways. :we'
• Promote healthy lifestyles, a cleaner environment,
and an improved quality of life. = r; i
• Provide safe connected routes within the city, -
offering easy transportation to schools, parks, and
pedestrian-friendly shopping areas. ' - _ —
Extend recreational opportunities and
transportation choices by connecting to
neighboring cities.
Types of Cyclists
Bicyclist skill level is important for understanding the characteristics and infrastructure preferences of different
cyclists. Bicycle infrastructure should use planning and design options, from shared roadways to separate
facilities, to accommodate as many user types as possible and to provide a comfortable experience for the
greatest number of cyclists. For example, some recreational cyclists may only feel comfortable using off-street
pathways or on-street dedicated bike lanes. Other cyclists may prefer to use streets and do not want their right
to occupy any travel lane limited by bike lanes.
Several systems of bicyclist classification are used within the bicycle planning and engineering professions.The
following bicycle user types are adapted from a classification system adopted by the City of Portland, Oregon:
Cyclists who will ride anywhere regardless of roadway conditions.These cyclists can
Strong and Fearless ride faster, prefer direct routes,and will choose to ride on roadways,even if shared
with other vehicles, over separated bicycle facilities like shared use paths. They
may cycle longer distances and ride at speeds of 20-40 mph depending on grade.
Intermediate cyclists who are mostly comfortable riding on all types of bicycle,
Enthused and facilities but typically prefer low traffic streets,bike lanes,or separated paths when
Confident ; available.They may deviate from a more direct route to avoid arterials with heavy
traffic volumes,in favor of a preferred facility type.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 46
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
1 These cyclists typically ride only on low volume, low speed streets or paths under
favorable conditions and weather. They perceive traffic and safety as significant
Interested but barriers to increased cycling.They may choose to ride on sidewalks if no on-street
Concerned facility is available or walk their bike across intersections. These cyclists may
become Enthused and confident with additional education and experience. They
typically ride shorter distances at speeds around 8-12 mph.
Not Able or Not People in this category are not cyclists. They may not participate in cycling for a
Interested variety of reasons, including inability, a lack of interest, or perceived safety issues.
Special accommodations are needed for children to feel safe bicycling. Children
riding on their own or with parents may not ride as quickly as adults, but still desire
access to schools, parks, and other key destinations. While children have a wide
range of skills and cognitive abilities,
children tend to: =_- ;¢- -
,Vitt y �
o Have a relatively narrow field of
vision. �
o Have difficulty understanding risks. `, :` -
Children .
o Have difficulties accurately judging „�( : , •
the speed and distance of an ,.,
approaching vehicle. '� -
o Assume the driver of a motor vehicle
can see them if they can see the vehicle.
o Have difficulty concentrating on more than one thing at a time.
° o Have difficulty determining the direction of auditory input.
o Have little experience with the rules of the road because they do not drive.*
*2012 Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities,4th Edition,AASHTO .
I '
Many of the cyclists who are currently seen riding in Southlake would likely fit into either the Strong and Fearless
or Enthused and Confident categories.
Types of Infrastructure
Southlake's network of bicycle facilities should include a mix of facility types which can be practically
implemented and meet the needs of local cyclists. When identifying bike routes and the types iof facilities to
implement throughout the City, consideration must be given to accommodate different types of cyclists and to
respond to the context of neighboring land uses, speed and volume of motorist traffic, and availability of right
of way.The following types of bicycle infrastructure are not intended to be an exhaustive list, but they are the
types of facilities that may be appropriate for consideration in Southlake.
• Shared Lanes
A shared roadway is simply a roadway that is open to both bicycle and motor vehicle travel. Generally in Texas,
bikes are permitted on all roadways even if there are no signs or lane markings indicating that the roadway is a
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 47
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
shared lane facility. According to the Texas Transportation Code (§551.103), bicyclists are required to ride as
near as practicable (not as possible)to the right curb or edge of the roadway,with limited exceptions.
• Dedicated Bicycle Lanes
Bike lanes are one-way facilities that typically carry bicycle traffic in the same
, direction as adjacent motor vehicle traffic. Bike lanes are provided for the
1n exclusive or preferential use of bicyclists on a roadway and are identified
--T through signage, striping, or other pavement markings. Bike lanes are
typically provided on thoroughfare types of facilities and are intended to
provide separation between motor vehicles and bicyclists. This separation
•a
,' provides for additional comfort to the less experienced bicyclists and
encourages these riders to use on-street facilities. Traditionally, only the
more aggressive, experienced riders (Enthused and Confident riders) are
comfortable sharing a lane with cars on thoroughfare roadways.The addition
of bike lanes can increase types and numbers of on-street riders. However,
Enthused and Confident riders may disregard bike lanes if'they are too
successful and become crowded with slower users.
The minimum operating width of a bike lane should not be less than 4 feet and the maximum operating width
should not be greater than 6 feet. Bike lanes wider than 6 feet are commonly mistaken by motor vehicles as
travel lanes or parking areas.
Due to right of way constraints,dedicated bicycle lanes are not feasible in Southlake unless they are incorporated
into future roadway widening projects. Since most roadways will not be widened,other facility options must be
considered.
• Signed Roadways
Signed roadways are simply shared lane roadways with a "SHARE THE ROAD" sign
' - '-,1 assembly or similar roadside sign type. Signed roadways are facilities that are already
`. frequently utilized by bicyclists or that the City would like to encourage bicyclists to
utilize over unsigned roadways. The signage provides enhanced awareness to motorists
_ , 1.7 ; . that bicyclists are present and reminds them to afford the bicyclists the same rights as
- they would to motorized vehicles. Due to limited right of way and funding availability,
this type of bicycle facility may be the most practical for improving the bicycle network
, throughout the City.
• Wide Outside Lane Roadways
Lane widths that are 14 feet or greater (excluding the gutter) allow motorists to pass bicyclists without
encroaching into the adjacent lane. Wide outside lanes are an option when there is some available right of way
to accommodate cyclists, but the width is not sufficient to provide either bike lanes or paved shoulders. This
type of facility is generally appropriate on arterials and collectors where the design speed is greater than 25
mph. Since wide lanes may result in faster travel speed by motorists,wide outside lane facilities should be signed
appropriately with signage to raise awareness of the presence of bicyclists. The new section of White Chapel
Boulevard is an example of a Wide Outside Lane facility,with 14 foot outside lanes to accommodate cyclists.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 48
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
• Sidewalks
While the roadway is typically the MOTORIST
'_- - `I safest location for most bicyclists to_...45N
RULES OF THE ROAD
"A----N,N ride, sidewalks are a part of the active
4 _ transportation network and some Obey speed limits. Higher speeds
a b``� c
bicyclists, particularly children, may result in greater injuries to cyclists
H ; prefer sidewalks to roadways. and pedestrians.
' Bicyclists may ride on sidewalks if they Obey signs,signals,and markings.
a _ _ I; travel at or below the design speed of Always look for bicyclists when
_ the sidewalk (often the speed of a turning left or right.
typical jogger). However, apart from
children, most bicyclists typically travel faster than this speed. Pass bicyclists giving at least three
feet of space. Slow down and do not
pass if space does not allow.
There are several reasons bicycling on sidewalks is not
recommended. The narrow width of the City's sidewalks (8 feet Do not use your horn in close
in width or less) makes passing other sidewalk users difficult and proximity to bicyclists.
can cause conflicts between users. The minimum recommended Look for bicyclists when opening
width for paths to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians doors.
is 10 feet.
In addition, bicyclists on sidewalks do not approach
intersections and driveways from the same areas as motor <-,---- -.-------- ---- -- ---- -- ----- ---
vehicle traffic,so they can be difficult for drivers to see. Further,
cycling hazards, such as low hanging branches, are more likely BICYCLIST
on a sidewalk than on a roadway. Bicyclists who choose to ride RULES OF THE ROAD
on the sidewalk in either direction must be educated about the
hazards associated with this practice and understand that Follow the same laws that apply to
cyclists must always yield to pedestrians on sidewalks. motorists. Obey all traffic signals,
signs, and lane markings.
• Existing Facilities Always yield to pedestrians.
Ride on the right side of the road with
Currently there are no dedicated bicycle lanes in the City. the flow of traffic.
However, there are several routes that have "Share the Road"
signs (see images on the next page) to raise awareness of Always wear a properly fitting helmet.
bicyclists. These routes include: Ride predictably, assertively,and be
> Dove Road alert. Use hand signals before
> North White Chapel Boulevard turning.
> Peytonville Avenue Be visible. If riding at night, use lights,
> Carroll Avenue reflectors,and bright clothing.
> Continental Boulevard Avoid riding on sidewalks if possible.
When riding on sidewalks, keep
speeds close to a typical,jogging
speed.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 49
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
These are the routes that are most frequently used by local bicycling clubs. In .
addition,there are bicycle signs(bicycle symbol without the"Share the Road"text) Y
on Southlake Boulevard near White Chapel Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue. -
• Recommended Facilities -_'I
When developing recommendations, the types of cyclists, the types of trips
i ,
(utilitarian vs. recreational) and the different types of equipment (such as road .
bikes, cruisers, tandems, and trailers) are all important considerations. The -= -- -
ultimate goal of the bicycle network is to accommodate as many user types as ,
possible and to provide a comfortable experience for the greatest number of •
cyclists. With these considerations in mind,the recommended facilities are shown E
on the following map. The recommended facilities are available in a table format 4-- , •—
Example of a"Share the
in Appendix C. Road"sign found on multiple
routes
i
LEGEND
r' 7 .. =Signed Route(Tier Ilq`;
'�•�L "Signage should be placed on
Bicycle Facility Kirkwood only afteracontinuous
Master Plan b roadway section is completed
�• (Kimball Ave.to SH 114)
;' . . . idi0.,`.-`-`,,_. 1 ®Signed(Tier I)
', ) ,Ii I Dedicated Bike Lane(Ter III)
({�� y ,' ,,,„ II Signed Routes(Tier I) j
J';;. . 1 �d.L • '�
c )t . {o
.4,1i 1 . - , L:. —all 1
tr q _ IT �
I Jug. . 7.-`i�',,fneini : I}-1'I
�j !...� v i Ali ;
Sr 1 I�{, ,i, V�1 AJ j 11•i 1Q
t' 1
?i, P' d ! c7- •_.i O.ENO ST
;,j`F ��- f���� rx �`.�� * ".�I Fes.- ���'`a I___� �
:'.:1::
�II Z Ili /^�� 1 1_ al G=. 7 ��i 1—
•--JONNS Dr--art,. ��s,gruaicEE IMF �'. ,E,SO LANEBLVD� ~'
.li 1 `•1 4 .,UUn' C';-"7)lt' il"If' (A.,:,,.-'f'' �1 J i.�--7 7' .-i1 "�"�`
c: '�I '�.5. {S;r. �, 'Pnl yc.A.(�7;�c
]f qC. tl c� C+""", 1.._..e+
' :30��., ,:iLl7I ': i _r-11111f�51 ; i m 1 • .p"� '/,GC.._i I a
)QI 5� z � r.....� 7c j; 11iL�✓.�L w��nl i ore
d `�1 !I`w '��'=7�i.�.;;� ,(��.. :tea r �., ',.,i ,..
0114
1
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 50
I
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
SIDEWALK FACILITIES
A safe, seamless, and effective sidewalk network continues to be •:r= jai :. ,-: " �y
a top priority for the City of Southlake. In the 2019 Citizen Survey, 'i< ''' ", , *'
91% of respondents listed sidewalks as a topic of high - -
importance. The primary objectives for Southlake's pedestrian - ® '°,'ac a
network are to connect neighborhoods to adjacent schools, �_
parks, recreational facilities, shopping centers, and employment -
centers; to close gaps between existing facilities; to facilitate - _
travel between neighborhoods; and to connect Southlake with -• -
neighboring communities. ' -. • _ .
Sidewalk construction in Southlake is primarily funded through s-
the following means: 1 'i <. _A - -., ---,,"..�'�
—a--
• Capital Improvements Program Direct Funding. Each • i
year, approximately $200,000 is allocated for sidewalk
construction.
• Capital Improvements Program Indirect Funding. When r,;
roadways are widened, sidewalks are included on both r f l l
l iJ
sides of the street as part of the project. In addition, park
improvement projects may include sidewalk and trail _
construction. r
.ter, .TM`. 4A4' o• . ;.-
• Developers Agreements. With limited exceptions,all new °' • .\ ,�: +!r
commerical and residential developments must provide , :,,.., , ••1
sidewalks along City streets. L n �f
• Grant Funding. City staff actively seek out grant funding i - - � - _ -
opportunities for sidewalks and apply whenever the City _is 7 `- - `^
eligible. Several of the sidewalk segments along Southlake ., - `-
Boulevard were funded in part by the competitive , - - r- i I
Transportation Enhancement Program, which is federally , - _ , _, ,..;
funded and administered by the Texas Department of �_� ____ _ __ —__'____.-----
Transportation.
f'r' i
• Neighborhood Sidewalk Matching Funds Program.
Residents can formally request the City to participate in up ;-- :. = -s=,--
to 50%of the cost of designing and constructing sidewalks
within their neighborhoods. Neighborhood organizations • - - I
and Homeowners Associations are encouraged to apply '- - .T i,
for funds to build sidewalk -- ..
a projects they feel would make r
a difference in improving the safety of their -, '`4 , % ,
neighborhoods or provide critical connections to schools, '.
parks or other sidewalks. ' , .;" 'a§ ! ',
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 51
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Accessibility
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA),the City of Southlake completed a self-evaluation
of all city services, programs and facilities.The purpose of a self-evaluation is to identify and correct deficiencies
that are not consistent with the requirements of Title II of the ADA. Southlake's self-evaluation included
assessments of curb ramps and pedestrian signals. The City of Southlake's ADA Transition Plan addresses
noncompliant facilities.
Sidewalk Classification
In an effort to simplify the Pathways Map and make the proposed pathways system easier to understand, the
pathways classifications used in previous plans were consolidated into the following categories: I
• Pathway—Any sidewalk or trail intended primarily for walking, running, hiking,and/or horseback riding.
• Existing Sidewalks—Built sidewalks that are 6 feet or less in width.
• Existing Multi-Use — Built sidewalks that are 8 feet or more in width. Although these sidewalks are
intended primarily for pedestrians, they may also accommodate low speed cyclists and!other similar
users.
• Existing Equestrian/Hike—Built trails and sidewalks,primarily located within City parks. These pathways
vary in width depending on site conditions and user needs. They may be concrete, asphalt or natural
surface and are intended primarily for hiking and/or horseback riding.
• Future Sidewalks—Recommended sidewalks that are 6 feet in width.
• Future Multi-Use—Recommended sidewalks that are 8 feet or more in width. Although these sidewalks
are intended primarily for pedestrians,they may also accommodate low speed cyclists and other similar
users.
• Park Connection Recommendations—Planned sidewalks or trails within or adjacent to City parks. Thee
pathways may be concrete,asphalt or natural surface and vary in width. Additional information on these
sidewalks and trails may be found in the Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Master Plan.
I '
Sidewalk Construction Prioritization
Beginning with the 2007 Sidewalk Plan, staff identified critical sidewalk gaps throughout the City and ranked
those gaps based on the following criteria:
1. proximity to schools,
2. proximity to parks,
3. proximity to existing and future trails,
4. proximity to destinations of commerce,
5. connections to other cities, and
6. adjacency to roadway type (residential street vs. arterial).
On an annual basis, that initial ranking was used to prioritize construction through the Capital Improvements
Program,also taking into account factors of funding availability, right-of-way constraints,construction feasibility
(due to topography,drainage,trees,etc.),and development status of the land. In addition, new segments were
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 52
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
identified annually as a result of the construction of new neighborhoods, schools, parks, commercial
developments,and roadway improvements.
The 2007 list of critical sidewalk gaps was reviewed and updated as part of the Southlake 2030',process, and
again as part of the Southlake 2035 process. Segments that have been completed or that are in progress have
been removed and new segments have been identified and added as a result of continued development. For
Southlake 2035, a consulting firm was utilized to rank segments based upon:
• Connectivity- prioritizing connections to schools and parks;
• Constructability - including factors such as relocation of utilities, tree removal, and impact on other
existing features(such as signs,fencing, and landscaping); and
• Feasibility-considering factors such as whether or not an easement is needed, presence of a bar ditch,
the need for a pedestrian bridge,and grading.
Once the initial rankings were received from the consultant, the list was reviewed and assessed by staff. In
particular, additional consideration was given for segments that could be included with other planned capital
projects. The resulting sidewalk construction priority list will continue to serve as a starting point for prioritizing
projects for construction through the CIP on an annual basis. This list is intended to be a fluid document with
the addition of new segments as new developments are constructed and new needs are identified. Further,tier
ranking recommendations are intended only as a general guideline and are subject to change due to site
conditions, feasibility of inclusion in other CIP projects (such as roadway improvements), and availability of
funding during the given budget year. See Appendix C for the sidewalk construction priority list.
•
53
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035]
0
tz
CU
ct
z CD
*Iti1I,t
7 QC)()
o
. ■
D nrjlrl If�� vigil'
.ffstfunriv��
1 Q- b,;11� IIII IDIIIJI - q Official
O Illlll�llullllll [I�{�.,.
...
.,rllrlq; V
t� .� rill
,� ' -aj E ZETA,
Pathways Map
c .11,t. I'►i_ rwCD
maule �t Ordinance No.1075C
F:: %"I i�� \r.:��/•_...pig=
+'��� 1�^ \�'�r"'!�111 °=`i(=*�' Adopted by the Southlake City V o
t x �Iu���S� /ill►� ■rr .Iw (A
O �y r. �,� IIII—v_,i ,_ Council on December 7,2021 0
11,aliiita,Mlitt,firr'l '
Ili e E Ili � ��i1''ri•�'"31 (�r'�f l. IGIILury
wiii>j - Legend ni
::; :a...__•a: r►.. —., _,11 riahrilmir Ilt�lllllp.;vl 'riIIIIIrit�`1 0
'- `• 1■ 'hI�; 4• * Existing Tretiheeds
"� .. - ■�� rvVil 1 r r 3 r■ I 111�-.4' i11i rn 1JJ
■ul■■n•1:_■r• u I ''' r .rx■1 IIII . 114741
Tier t PriorAy Segments`
rl�rlklrl: rlr�i7 -• S •a IIIIIIt ip. l!1
5 ..tr,i7r` ;:- `Ill�i �r� tl���i s=vr`.': ;•,.;.,•`J, 11111����/Ur��`�` g,, D C Tier 2 Priority Segments`(2021)
.�
�__ 'gn.r.■a■r•f■.i� iiuii: ,,, 1-1lf ��{j rr �.00)1-4 r11i.
u IrefiiiMi 9! , 111 �iI h ,{F�� � ,�,� '1 o�Tier3Pdomy Segments.(2021)
771
�::�;'ri:■Fi i:'�i {►1 i�!� Ar 111 ;y, e•����i��__. 1i
IIR ►,�I .�i ► r I IIAr� ,,,�
■1'la!I�111 1: r1Ctal•i:m�I Gu.�JI .iew�-. r.fii +—�„, rx i�l NeighborhoodSegments( )
IIII`�1'� /��
2021
C ��.=_h`:nua�Ip�:. �5=� ri t�► > ? �`jl I e�, .ill_�' ate]TxDOT Segments(2021)
�%J/.r10.� i ..rJl►r E`±, II 14e]Y I��Iya��. It �• ■ �I �e
a lb Il►-rai/-/%Trur1 .Wr m 11III1 e_L' i . , ! �,'�i,�+ I '`�ifll —Existing Sidewalk
II I.\n ittl:p r Ilr 1g•1 � /I r .�� 'rt..'- '1Wg sid Ik(°8�
uuu ihu ` ■
::Illl��/i�•, �QUuunt•� w ae3 ,1•t �kl �� I11 : ak, —ExisWg Multi-Use
rn rn ' ►• l��.p r r it _ 1 —Y *AL-km*1M
aFxisWg EquestriaNFUke
W •'ai.rr. I►���1'ai .x w '_r •R'L.gh ■i1�i��il�' `ILI�j-�i■i 11� Ili: ®-_no r••ip�� r,. nn5 :r ! ���+57.'� 1 L.}•- ■ ■,n-- -Future Sidewalks(.8)
:" '
.. •• - ��, 'r r�� -Future Multi-Use gli B)
I�.TINEr11_,er�l v pgl ., tnrtr -�,th �. i-I�� 11�! a lei 1�_=Rr
� ■n!�■.1 � p( r"'���.11 ( Ii, 1 I:- r'r l�L�C�•� �r■'.�:I�ylEllriii arx., -■_■Future EquestdanMike
P F t i r4 / nn nuo li lr„ iv;1'•.i
;�■ i 1■ y uat S i I I ir n r 7!1 a rruli ( �i+r«Ili:o�'�•J•.�'✓•``'7_�ali�d --_
r1,' 1 +1i d 1 1 r 1 ,� �1 r•t ■■lutpu`41 rfa r..r. --u.- ,• -Future Natural
I!• I: c �I td1 I :�� J :•#rlr?Illm- -Fr' ^+. _ � �••■Lauu..r_r1.:AAlYo.��.v c4vw. ��!r
I Ihll IIII j':r'•�_J 1 i U•■'•r nnc r r 71 c t■ o r Park Connection Recommendations
-Uq�ll�g r) �r w , 'r
s to �C� r. -r r i V. it �1' �(I1��;��%tr �■ lill�s , 2�
-I Di +;f O,y0 i t a a I p1)5 'l�IfiTA ■i �t V. for �� I I 1�■��" 12,1-rr [ _]Public Parks
p(.� �r�G t1.�� x g $ v l e 7 �7AIIIII% � '
P � I/l . �- � ! Ti Li(rr"���E—1► er I s I �r �� s1'll.
r a 1 I�\ setA I_' `L Ir,-t,' ■lilu1 :_p.4 i�,If . 7 JIILII�l-1 I^'Ar•�I■r.
1�1■ Ii'ti !i 1 V _•..........................................t . t W TY n yi4 I71-1 I��'�C ■■I I
� �q r•� .��1,�,a t 77 VIA ■ t 4ii _III11 .a ► r( ' -( I I ate. e...... orscuelex
0
�r ::�ii>;f a�c(•11r ,Js i`�= 1 xaw / -n-s-;�("`' 1l Pig- 1 r"t L. 1r! 1�
:� I II l l : j t-t w r -rr rf{ ,L^ 4\ mea xrm ece.a.�peer.mear
�I wail
�I'1 ` 1-i-r��s-a''itr �.17 ( r� 1 +e kr ��- { i 4-t�15 i r 1 IIII�Ej r Ill
dsar�weambra rhrtnamnvl
;R B I:� l .I I � `4 , }tea `fit ! rirJ owes v�.Owl=a.m m]
oss
Hut 1. 1 r1 r ',.■ L. u� .1 1 ,y WI11h pllti, Jai •4 min, ' I ! + ��✓ '' ;: raLL-�sxe eusaneeNcvw aa..
+H__ -IIII mild' Illu li-I�A LU ?N.�A�� 11�}—.< 1t tzar-I1ra /d. mmeammieaewmmo..yw�a
u�r to - y{• ,_— r■�r ;i._. r �W_ lilt . �q.x.raxmr mca emoe. a
r , r a ':;:r. .!r,l.• r;■I ..�a dar.m d,E..r�..�
----- - �� �`� IatiR M • .o:•.. lio1..`i:;i-;•011 1 ■ .maewema.ue.m,.:rau�eam.
' .�� .11� 11 i�r���� " G rl Ir �y ��1�^��Y,a a r■��'w daarmmlvrcu.aee.amar.ax .
'��!" '� i 3S ♦ wmucrvxaa.�a. v.on..gmq
am" �•j "TL.1 G i o :u ---- - - - --- -- --- - - - - --- -a
� anpwn A,avA,mgummtleeb pnm
�/IN it )Ri' ' t�eamnrre.udne as
'+L w"� Scale-1:54000
��/(►j".=�'? a� Last Basemap Revision:1211l2021 a
1 inch=4500 ft .
no
Planning and Development Services
OPX1Geagraphic Information Systems Q
Ps
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
CROSSWALKS
In addition to sidewalks and bicycle facilities, planning for a safe, efficient, and effective active transportation
system must also include crosswalks. As traffic volumes continue to increase with local and regional growth
and pedestrian counts increase with the expansion and improvement of the active transportation system,
establishing and maintaining safe and effective crosswalks is of critical importance. I
I
1
Although different types of crosswalks are appropriate depending on roadway classification and site conditions
(such as school zones), uniform standards for similar conditions are desirable to prevent confusion among
motorists and pedestrians.These standards are outlined in the following table.
c. ` I, -,. ' ` -, - I
OW
r "fi� r . y.`i �%�
' tL —�� 2 -fir ,7�•
{ 1
A!L y
i 1 0i 0-,c,:, ,:,,-,,,:,—::„-::,..7.-
..4,,„,-....-._,..,:4...
s . n. v 1
A.e
r y e-yr �, .. j 11'---- J J -I r - _ ec r�i;
44 +s l I 52 i C� f.' I,F-- . ii`.f _ = l '. 1
II
{.tt-t 1
sr
..
tom, `3` 1' !. "',t 1�v1 `-A f�.• - ,. .:. '
i "7:K`.. !% %1 1" ,I -. ---. ` "
,.- w. -
r
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 55
1
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Table P-1:Recommended Crosswalk Type
Crosswalk Example. Recommended Application
Type
Continental - - I_ • I ,
_ _ "Continental"striping,is
recommended across arterials,
-
Marked I♦ collectors,school drives, and
Continental residential streets within school
zones.
Standard , +
"Standard" striping is
Marked- recommended across local and
Standard41 ]
residential streets.
° " Intersections(without traffic lights)
4 ; that are in or near school zones or
; a` in other areas that are likely to
140 `to
Marked.& , ` _ri " ' ` have heavy pedestrian traffic.
,,�A ,F _f.�IAA `* - , 1,, ;:;= Signs may be used in conjunction
Signed
with "continental" striping,
"standard" striping,or stamped
asphalt or concrete depending on
the type of street.
Stamped Roundabouts,Town Square, S.H.
Asphalt or 114 intersections,and selected
Stamped �'r — �' gym'. ' intersections along Southlake
Concrete -� i ' Boulevard (as recommended in the
- Urban Design Study).,
Ordinance Nb.1075-C,.Adopted'December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 56
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Table P-1: Recommended Crosswalk Type
Crosswalk
Example Recommended Application
Type
r-� }Y, I 1
w - `A { Midblock locations, particularly in 1
Active - - _ or near school zones. Active a
Warning :i -tl warning beacons should be used in 1
Beacon ,,�31-. .,--- F , conjunction with"continental"
_. -r:' W.41.,0-- striping.
( I
__,
/ --\ I
PUSH
BUTTON j
FOR . At intersecting collector and I
Traffic Signal arterial intersections, push-button
Intersections activated pedestrian signals are
Irecommended.
MNII i
1
1
1
1
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] i 57
I
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
IMPLEMENTATION, PRIORITAZATION AND
EVALUATION
PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
A plan is only as good as the methods by which it is used as a tool for the ultimate goal, implementation.While
several substantial transportation improvements through the City remain, the City is in generally good shape
(compared to population size) with meeting current needs. The next section provides the strategy that was
undertaken to determine which recommendations and needs should be addressed earlier rather than later. The
end result of this strategy is the Summary of All Mobility Plan Recommendations (Appendix C) which serves as
the blueprint for plan implementation.
PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE
For each specific recommendation, a relative ranking(tier) has been established to assist with the'timeframe of
implementation for the recommendation. The tiers are divided into three different categories based on
timeframe to implement:
• Tier 1: 1 to 3 Years
• Tier2:4to7Years
• Tier 3:8 Years and beyond
The tier rankings are used in the development of department work plans as well as the Capital Improvements
Program (CIP). In fact,the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) planning process begins and ends!with projects
recommended by this master plan.Annually,as part of the City's budget process,city staff analyzes the adopted
master plan and develops a comprehensive list of projects with preliminary cost estimates for inclusion in the
proposed CIP.The proposed CIP is submitted to the CIP Technical Committee (department directors),who rank
them based on set criteria. The priority list that was developed during this master plan will help guide future
members of the City's boards and City Council when making decisions related to the CIP.
While these tiers provide the ideal order of implementation and desired priority for the mobility
recommendations,all recommendations are subject to available funding during the given budget;year and will
be placed on the Capital Improvements Program (CIP)accordingly.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 58
I i
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
APPENDIX A
Level of Service (LOS) Descriptions
The following descriptions have been adopted directly from the Transportation Research Board's
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000), Fourth Edition. Quality of service requires quantitative
measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service (LOS) is:a
quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such
service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort
and convenience.
Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters
designate each level, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS:F
the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and the driver's
perception of those conditions. Safety is not included in the measures that establish service levels.
Level of Service A
Level of Service A describes a condition of free flow, with low volumes and high speeds.
Level of Service B
Level of Service B is the zone of stable flow, with operating speeds beginning to be restricted
somewhat by traffic conditions. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their speed and lane
of operation.
Level of Service C
Level of Service C is the zone of mostly stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely
constricted by the higher volumes.
Level of Service D
Level of Service D is a zone that approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds, however
driving speed is considerably affected by changes in operating conditions.
Level of Service E
Level of Service E is a zone that cannot be described by speed alone. Operating speeds are lower than
in Level D, with volume at or near the capacity of the highway.
Level of Service F
Level of Service F is a zone in which the operating speeds are controlled by stop-and-go mechanisms,
such as traffic lights. This is called forced flow operation. The stoppages disrupt the traffic flow so
that the volume carried by the roadway falls below its capacity; without the stoppages, the volume of
traffic on the roadway would be higher, or in other words, it would reach capacity.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 59
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
It should be noted that LOS is a measure of a roadway segment's (zone's) efficiency, at moving
automobiles through the zone. By definition, it places a high emphasis on the free-flowing speeds of
autos and does not give consideration to the comfort or safety other roadway users suchlbicyclists or
pedestrians.
1 m ""f 4 ri g ��" ' a� i
-b ° w fi € oIlont
II adiabliP i Good
[ OMR ( ccpb9
E 1 Carl ed!
r p
i; 1$
. 1,,',i,..'4''''''''rtkilA i:',;114.'::$,::-,!:]':;:',1-.::': . .. .. ' '', ''„..1 '.'111,-.11 '-': ': . . . . '..", ,..''''1 11',-:''-1!; '1',''',:::::'•." .::•
• 1'' JL4b:1. ti '' iI&Ti
I
' ,:,.••:-1,,;;--',•;:"';',,'1 ri.:,,,„.-, - . - , s , • . -. : .1 a • . . ,
41
ANEW-7;f Aaallitil • .. 'p
- -sip 7.pramt,-,
° -�� ;-
.
•
.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 60'
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
APPENDIX
South Village Center Drive Guidelines
ORDINANCE NO.1056
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS, FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTED MOBILITY AND MASTER
THOROUGHFARE PLAN MAP TO INDICATE THE GENERAL ALIGNMENT OF
SOUTH VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE GENERALLY EXTENDING FROM EAST
SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) to SOUTH NOLEN DRIVE AND TO
BECOME EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE AND APPROVAL.
WHEREAS,the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local
Government Code;and
WHEREAS,Section 11.06 of the Southlake City Charter provides for the adoption and updating of'a
Comprehensive Master Plan and its components, including the Master Thoroughfare Plan;and,
WHEREAS,the Planning and Zoning Commission has forwarded a recommendation for an amendment
to the Master Thoroughfare Plan.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1
Pursuant to Section 11.06 of the Southlake City Charter,the Comprehensive Master Plan,of which the
Master Thoroughfare Plan is a component, may be submitted in whole or in part from time to time to the
Council for their adoption,accompanied by a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission,
and shall contain a planning consideration for a period of at least ten (10) years. The proposed
amendments to the Master Thoroughfare Plan,noted by graphical depiction in Exhibit"A"and Exhibit'B"
and attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
• Design as a 60'foot(C2U)collector roadway with a speed limit not to
exceed 30 mph.
• Design as an 'Urban" cross-section roadway which includes curb
gutters,street trees and sidewalks.
• Traffic calming measures should be considered in the design of the
roadway.
• At the time the roadway connection to Kimball Avenue is made from the
west, the C1SD's north drive connection to Kimball Avenue shall be
closed and the western most school service drive shall be connected to
the new roadway.
Ordinance No. 1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 61'
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
• Intersection improvements such as pedestrian crosswalks
should be considered at the following locations: 1)the two-way
intersection located at the southwest corner of the Gateway
Church property;2)the intersection at Southwood Drive; 3)the
three-way intersection located at the corners of the
Greenway/Quicksall/CISD properties;4)the intersection of the
school's west drive;and 5)the intersection of S.Kimball Avenue
and S.Village Center Drive.
• The northern boundary of the CISD property should be fenced to
minimize potential vehicle/pedestrian conflict.
• During design of the roadway, mitigation measures of the new
roadway on adjacent residential properties such as landscaping,
buffering,fencing and screening shall be considered.
• The portion of the roadway near the intersection of the CISD
school drive shall be designed with a center turn lane in both
directions to allow stacking to occur during school drop of and
pick up times.
• Staff will evaluate the southwest portion of the roadway
alignment(Gateway Church property where the 90 degree
turn is located)and consider safety improvements during the
design that will improve safety to the adjacent neighborhood.
SECTION 2
The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and amended by the City
Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Southlake,
along with a copy of the minute order of the Council so adopting or approving same.Any existing element of
the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been heretofore adopted by the City Council shall remain in full
force and effect until amended by the City Council as provided herein.
SECTION 3
This ordinance shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 5th day of February,2013.
MAYO
ATTEST:
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 62
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master. Plan
"SOUTk ,.,•,
Umil L•'FFAa
a (Lt., . 0
CITY SECRETARY .........
°}**,naa,...
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 19th day of February,2013.
MAYOR T II ,,,...........
.......,,�
ATTEST: so‹,.;,pU H a%f.
CITY SECRETARY ••..,•...�'
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: `°"
Cee ,-3 7e )2,
CITY ATTORNEY t`
/�
DATE: 7 1,2-A04
ADOPTED: 4-IpR -.�//-
EFFECTIVE:tY-i-/ ..2Q�i
EXHIBIT"A"
ctry Or'
tam,! r . R040 SOUTHLAKE SOUTHLAKE
aaa=ltay l li MAW RCM ._ 62bj-r '..'-'--2025
,'-2 0 2 5
+ Ra�M1fiSi11930(1�'ROYdPerfx�{ t-' ■� '`:.,,Ty
Ili
1
®114D-IOTktrYI 7.u.l',,'
• A40-ail Maid ..‘14,. int _____I
ot'� -
- Southlake 2025 Plan
••.All-77kGrhl S ' -too: : 34�r ►iliT Mobility&MasterThoroughfare Plan
lan
.1 au•7vcalm�r do `1°
C►•l,cd� '®—' _ Functional Classifcafion System
•.,tmsanAtcaEuenienl �, .
- - r: :."
. . of Roadways
� ..1.+�,...- ? F - , P a&incS-02T 19 20e5
""' ^�' ••••..i i" . a Ameaiad6rL11yCauz4 May t5.1A77
1 �":+�_. `r' annr (ksolA�OT-020
�!=n--- r...;IV.fig rt g- ,'� Amaid3lbycyCaano4Fe uay19,2539
asrelreatnyc�yaxmcusrts2ooe
n Y
.......�, • G lurendedbyGllyCbwdl(k�c�rnDerlQ2009
°rl ;...six. 19 -.3+ e tA4haAb 762
. „ • _ t -- 4 .ate?: MID
a- -It ill 1, r•1 t N. Y , O/d�W.AC9iuYe�
.f 1.,. u.n,,;.>yr�,�1�E'.i+.. -4, :- .ems..-.�.............
a"s- '
t••' / . t a3.'7, �4% �,1 ` I r rr,-. - �''f..- 1 174', i r...'',�era.
• al Vi ram.:,-� 7. . , 'u? `.. �' ).' : ""'..._..a....
km '_.. ....„..,.,..„0.,.._...
.n �z- `~..� ..--.-- �-r z -air ' TI 1py._.)
..n_ * f�_ 'aS s'1 i i' } wil
'�° Scme 1:54400
ti`^ �:r ' = I^ '., Iinch=4500(eef
1• y •
e
mai°"'..c.4" 4.0t0 1251 0 43W Feet
t WM
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 63
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
•
EXHIBIT "B"
•
k--nii---' = I ------1
L _: 1 I ! I
'I I i I ( . SOUTHLAKE sou-niLAKE
. —4
';
17 1 I
l \
-,, fity't•eg 14417,or 1 1r110.111•11•.;;
I
I
..., ..-... ••
'.--..._ a...... . ..... .. ..... . .s111) 7, Southlake 2025 Plan
,•
\ \c---11----- - -r T , MobiNy&Master
,
-.
Moroughfaia
Plan
— i E : ,
,„.
Functional Classikatron
. -...
I System of Roadways
I.. -.__ --___, t i
Lcgxel .
4- ' !ILI
% I: ,
_ • --I 1 L i;.I , M111111114ary 11.106403'RCM.
—1 q----- ' r. I ' -.'-'Fl -
,-- .....FbaustIMAIIM tInSIUCTOY/Flors1
...- j Irs.o..6 al—, i .. ' . 019111703/rht MS P1J7 RCM
1 I i
--- . • i • i : t a, - - .
..._„.71 I--I i I i r-Li r - jr
s 1-1- ,1 -,., -"---.___---- '
, -...._ _
01
I
.."11•1,13-1.111 31.1..1.14114111.t•.4•••
!.I ••PAD-1161*Maid t
I •,, .. ,....I..
'',----- ....Am-mem*. I
• Rra•---‘ L I 11 ..AIU-707tifid 1
---".--- °------r---I II ...KIM-34*Celbetee '
7 ..C2L1.7WCamestac 1
--'--- .
L_... •-:.„,...---A.----......,„
—LA : 8_________
I R--1 '1' ----
• ._.,_..." . '.'. .--..
• i 1. • . 1 -Ir. ,-_. ---.-.,.-_-_;.; 1
'i '' .__ ,•
1, i i FT-1-7-1 i
-• • . eitli i I
, I-----1.(
., •24•••aemplea•11M01•..
aisr.......
1•1•401•4102.1111•10..
' -7:--KASALPOU:Cr= , 1 $- 1.11 se.111•Overtiaamesr•rel.•
I I I I 1 1 I !,:i —TH t i 2: I---g •,— tangmelF1•••seMilead.
..10•1•4.111••••••••11.1.1
— I L ',L_ r ' " - M ,..e......................a.
i . 1 ! i --1 i '. ! --1--E-11.____I
2 Ins....1.1%.•=1=130.
' I
I ri I I 0
(.1 ii•••114.1•111xotsura.dat/1
__.r..4.-',,.--- , •. . ' , L R 1 I ., , . -.....=-6.- 1 talegleatteermoitsernaais a
N istmoiritrreamat j
, ,!-- J,.-J•-.i_i • . 1 ,,
E2 ------' ' 1 I "I I
_ i. . , i I 1
!
-,.....H-.-i 210\ir---ccici,...__z .11...._1:5_, ....:5_tto, ..•1 r..11.714ivrElpiv_--,;;-: •-i 1 .....=......1... 171 7
....moloal
• 11,
r ;----- -I i, ,,--i---1.-L-1.,-L-L.--,:t , i .........— 1 i
.,,, 1 j suoseogosrama=0 1 i , 1 inch.800feet
iILI " : --.--1-- -- r" I LI. ..; I =...
, -'- ano°11)4 T7-1-1 I- I `e
Pj
MI Eli
. .... , ,
,
,
,
I
I
1
,
I
,
,
1
•
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] • 64
•
•
•
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
APPENDIX C
Summary of all Mobility Plan Recommendations
Tier 1(1-3 Years)
Tier 2(4-7 Years)
Tier 3(8+Years)
Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
Ref. VGO Priority Responsible
Description/Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric. Strategic Link VNT Link
No: Tie Tier Department
'! Continental Blvd and S Peytonville '; Construct a roundabout at 1-Complete construction of the Ai II Mobility, I; Efficient ;' 3.1, l PW
Ave Roundabout il the intersection of W ;; Continental/S Peytonville II Infrastructure,,1 Mobility 3.3, .1 j
Il Traffic increases in the vicinity of" Continental and S : roundabout. Design is in " Cl C2 ,; Options 3.5,3.9
MT3 Continental and S Peytonville !I Peytonville. 1. progress. I"' -I I! i 1
during peak.times,school pick !' ;
up/drop off times,and during :I 'II' ii ;� i ? f
heavy use of Koalaty Park. 1 _—_ -- �— L_ =---- _ ___1,; Kirkwood Blvd,Extension from �.1 While the majority of the ' Dependent upon development 'I Mobility; ,F Efficient 3.1, { I PW_
', Dove to Highland ; roadway is anticipated to be II and as needs are determined, I' Infrastructure,.;; Mobility 3.3,
r Kirkwood is disconnected between constructed along with !I consider public participation in ' Cl,C2• ;i Options i; 3.5,3.9
MT7 .;I Dove and Highland. `I development,participate in , the extension of Kirkwood from I I1 3
.I the extension of Kirkwood I' Dove to Highland, 'I +�
p l from Dove to Highland,as - I°
appropriate. _.__Ii___
;, N White Chapel,Emerald to SH114 '; Improve this segment of N 1; Complete construction of Phase Mobility, :; Efficient !j 3.1,.. A j.PW,
Traffic volumes will increase on N White Chapel to its ultimate. r II from Emerald to Highland. I;Infrastructure, ! Mobility ; 3.3,.
i1White Chapel:Blvd between '' cross section. Phase I,' ,1 I;.C1,C2 1 Options ;; 3.5,3.9
Highland and SH 114.as I construction from the 11 ` ,, 'I
MT8 " j . 0 '1 1
! undeveloped properties designated II Highland Roundabout to SH ;! i
.1 as Mixed Use develop around.the 'k 114,was.completed in 2019. !; - I'
I
Methodist Southlake hospital. :! ;j jl. I
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted'Deceniber 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 65
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
Ref. VGO Priority Responsible
No. Description/Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link Tie Tier Department
1 N White Chapel Blvd,SH 114 to I Widen this segment of 'r Conduct a study of the future Mobility, {I Efficient 3.1, I PW I
II Dove Rd ` White Chapel to 4 lanes ' intersection at N White Chapel y3 Infrastructure, ii Mobility 3.3, ' 9
Ii Traffic volumes along N White divided by a median,with Blvd and Kirkwood Blvd. I C1,C2 I Options - 3.5,3.9 I -.
IChapel Blvd between SH 114 and other agreed improvements !I j
MT9 , Dove are anticipated to increase as . dependent upon and I Complete construction of the N I I ! 2
J Carillon builds out and the"property accompanying the Carillon White Chapel improvements ! II
I between N White Chapel Blvd and . .11 development. ; from SH 114 to Dove. This I I� !, . I "y
I SH 114 develops: 1t I project will be driven by. ' i II.
J� I . I development. - -i{. �; I •
ii S Carroll Ave widening from m Breeze 'i Widen this section of S I Complete construction of the S I Mobility, ,1 Efficient 13.1, ` PW
1 Way to FM 1709 j'Carroll Ave to its ultimate 4 ;f Carroll widening from FM 1709 Infrastructure, Ij Mobility ; 3.3,
f . Traffic volumes along S.Carroll from ii lane divided cross'section. 1I to Breeze Way. ! Cl,C2 ; Options 13.5,3.9 j I
MT13 i Breeze Way to FM 1709 will I , I' I I 3 I
I increase due to the Winding Creek I 1 ' I
1 residential,development and future ' l ii
_II development along FM 1709. _� I I {{
I Brumlow widening from 'I Widen this section of ; Complete construction of the I Mobility, iI Efficient {'4 3.1, 'I" PW
I Continental to SH 26 j Brumlow to its ultimate 4 Brumlow widening from Infrastructure, { Mobility { 3.3,
I Properties adjacent to Brumlow are .II lane divided cross section. {. Continental to SH 26. :II Cl,C2 i Options. Ii 3.5,3.9
9 mostly undeveloped or I; 1 I I
MT14 ! underdeveloped. Traffic volumes iI II . 4I I 1
II are anticipated to increase with the ;I' I 'I
'{ opening of the Municipal Service II i i
' {` Center.and as adjacent properties II . - ,I I; I
II develop.:` Ii Ii - II 11
II N Kimball Ave and E Dove Rd It Construct intersection if Complete construction of the N II Mobility, II Efficient r 3.1, { t"PW
{ II Intersection Improvements Ii improvements at the. . II;Kimball/Dove intersection II Infrastructure, II Mobility. 13.3,
.Traffic congestion is increasingly ,I intersection'of N Kimball and I improvements. Handled by, lj.C1,C2,CBOS . II Options 1 3.5,3:9 ,
heavy during peak hours at the li Dove. . - II Grapevine per interlocal 1. iI I I .
' MT15 i+ intersection of N Kimball and E II iI agreement. Ij Ii j 3 {
Dove,the only major connection I .- {, . !;
' I into Grapevine from Southlake IIl NII I '
'_ LnorthofSH114. :________ _ _, i�- �-I _�3i a,
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 66
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
Ref. VGO Priority Responsible
Description/Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link
No. Tie Tier Department
II S Village Center Dr Connector Acquire;design,-and I Complete construction of the Mobility, Efficient 3 3.1, -- PW
11 Traffic volumes are anticipated to construct Village Center 1 Village Center extension from Infrastructure, Mobility i 3.3,
1 increase along FM 1709 as I Drive from Kimball to Nolen. 11 Kimball to Nolen. This project C1,C2 , Options j 3.5,3.9
MT17 development occurs. Stacking it. I will be drive n by development. 3
I along Kimball creates.congestion ,i
' during peak times for school drop- ;i I1 - I
_____if off/pick-up. ji 1j . - . " _ 1I. ;L_� 1,
1 Bank St Connector • `.Design and construct a - II.Complete.construction of the 11 Mobility, i`"Efficient " 1 3.1, PW •.L______
II There is no westbound FM 1709 ' roadway connector parallel 11 Bank Street connector. I Infrastructure, i{ Mobility 13.3,
MT19�11 access from Nolen Street.An 1: to FM 1709 to preserve it 1 Cl,C2 Options 3.5,3.9. 3
11 alternate route is necessary to 'g access to commercial i 1
;provide access. - j businesses. _4 I - • L t_ ( _
!I FM 1709 and Pearson f Design and construct.. 1 Work with Keller to complete .. I` Mobility, i' Efficient 1 3.1, PW
!1 Improvements : : 11 intersection improvements' .1 construction of safety and: 1 Infrastructure, !1 Mobility 1 3.3,'. .
MT20 11 LOS anticipated to be'reduced with 11 at FM 1709/Pearson in mobility improvements'at FM ;I Cl,C2,CB04, ,.Options 1 3.5,,3.9 . 1
1 continued development along FM 'I partnership with Keller. I 1709/Pearson: II CB05 " 1 I
_ 1709 and Pearson Lane. _
IN.Carroll Ave widening from SH . . 11 Consider the widening of N. y Complete the widening and. 11 Mobility,. Efficient i i.3.1, PW.
.114to Dove Rd 1 Carroll Ave.from SH 114 to i improvements of N.Carroll 11 Infrastructure, , Mobility. i 3.3,
MT21 11 The level:of service is expected to 1 Dove Rd.as traffic counts,and 1 Avenue..This may occur in 111 Cl,C2. 1 .Options. 1 .3.5,3.9. 3
I decrease as Carillon and other ii level of service warrant. ' Ii phases. 31 11
properties adjacent to N.Carroll d .. i 1( I, 1
I Avenue continue to develop. IL _ If I I
11 FM 1709 Flyover Ti Consider the construction of I Complete the construction of ,1 Mobility, i' Efficient ( 3.1, PW
Id The level of service has dropped in. I the FM 1709 Flyover if the II the flyover onto westbound FM .I' Infrastructure, i Mobility . 3.3, _
11 the past but may have improved , level of service_and traffic { 1709. 1 Cl C2 I Options 3.5,3.9
MT22 1 i 1 3 j
i with the DFW Connector Project I counts warrant. 11 1' from the westbound frontage:road 1 _I : ;. .
II of S.H.114. i4 I 11. • 11 1 . L
11 FM 1938 and W Continental I1 Design and Construct IrComplete construction of 1a Mobility,_ 1 d1 Efficient )1 3.1, I PW
If Intersection Improvements 1 intersection improvements II intersection Improvements at - II Infrastructure, Mobility 11 3.3,
MT25 11 Increased traffic volumes op FM ,�1 at FM 1938 and W ; 1 FM 1938/W Continental. 1 Cl,C2,CB04 :I Options 1 3.5,3.9 1
li 1938,connecting to SH 114 and d Continental. 1' ' I 1 11
1 i ;i Continental Bivd. )— I ,. : .
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 67
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
Ref. VGO Priority Responsible
Description/Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link
No. Tie Tier Department
!I'Dove and Kirkwood Intersection , I Design and construct Complete construction of 11 Mobility, { Efficient: Pi 3.1, : PW
- IImprovements -intersection-of Dove and intersection improvements at Infrastructure, i Mobility • S; 3.3,
I Traffic volumes will increase as Kirkwood. Dove/Kirkwood, Cl,C2,CBO4 Options 1.3.5;3.9
MT26 I, property to the south develops and ' ' 1 _ 1
the intersection is built for the ;f i 11 i {
' I: continuous connection of ' . ii ! i,I i1 1
j Kirkwood. •
1 i - _,i._._ 1�.__ f
1 Kimball and Kirkwood Traffic Consider options for traffic 11 Conduct a study of the N 1I Mobility, Efficient 1 3.1, µ P.W
' Management Study I! management atthe ' 11 Kimball/Kirkwood intersection. # Infrastructure, 1 Mobility 3.3,
MT30 Increased traffic volumes as intersection of Kirkwood and it !I Cl,C2,CBO4 ii Options U 3.5,3.9 I 1
} properties adjacent to SH 114 and• !I N Kimball. ,, II • :{ 11
ij Kimball Ave develop._—__ __�i�__-- !' — —J`___��__i,___ 1'_____- _
• i Kimball and Village Center Traffic i{ Consider signalization or !j Conduct a study of the S I; Mobility, Efficient j 13.1, ..{ I PW .•
Management Study ;i other traffic management I Kimball/Village Center ii Infrastructure, li Mobility �' 3.3,
Traffic volumes will increase as the 11 devices at the intersection of II intersection. ,I Cl,C2,CBO4 1 Options 3.5,.3.9
ro erties located along S Kimball i! S Kimball and the Village it li 9
MT33:i P P g g { i 1 i 1 •
{I-Ave develop and create congestion ii Center Drive extension. , 1.
I •
I during peak times_and during 1i i q I;. i1 it i
!i school operations on the west side �iI I ,
l i} .
I I
al of S Kimball. _L__IL . . -it__ f —ai
I Traffic Management Options' "l Consider traffic II Explore options to add a traffic 11 Mobility, 1 Efficient 13.1, .PW . '!
,I As signals are installed and it management options ;4 management service. it Infrastructure, 1;.Mobility -.1 3.3, ' . •
i{'maintained by the city,current staff ,: through internal staffing or • ( 1 Performance !i Options. iI'3.5,3.9 .
MT35 lI will need to be responsive to traffic :; contracted services. !, Management '� ' ai :1 1
• ! I
1i'management issues. . ii '!I i' and Service j
If li I II Delivery,Cl, l: i I.
1 _._� i _ �{ . 1 C2,CBO4 IL _ L-- -:.„--..._.- -1
ii-Pedestrian Safety and Vehicle 4i Work with DP5 to determine ' Assess existing speed limits and If Mobility, ` Efficient ,�3.1,. PDS,PW,
•
;i-Speeds • ,F locations where speeding is modify them where appropriate.-•1, Infrastructure, i Mobility j{ 3.3, .DPS .
ii.Current speeds along may rights-of- j`i( high and to assess existing ;; ; Performance I! Options, i1 3.5,3.9
,1 .
way are higher than appropriate for !i speed limits. '; Encourage speed-appropriate , Management ,I Pedestrian ii •
MT36 !i'the designated classification. High I} i designs in new ROW i and Service j Design•• ,, 1
i I .
!I speeds create safety concerns; 11 i construction through the review •' Delivery,C1, . ii 1 .
II especially for locations highly. i • • process. C2 Ii •
4 • -a trafficked by pedestrians.— ---1=- - - - _._;i • __� _--al �i jL i _—
Ordinance No. 1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 20351 68
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
Ref. VGO Priority Responsible
No. Description/Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link Tie Tier Department
-
11 Property Access Management Develop a new Driveway" I Adopt a new Driveway Mobility, 1 Efficient 1 3.1, • +.PDS;PW
li The'city's current Driveway Ordinance reflecting current= Ordinance. Infrastructure, { Mobility j 3.3,
11 Ordinance is out of date and does, best practices to ensure Performance I Options 1I 3.5,3.9 I
MT39.I I not adequately meet needs for proper access to new - . ` Management . i- • 11 - 1
1I access management. ' , development.- I and Service• I .
11 , 1 Delivery,C1; . I
I Deceleration Lanes at Southrldge -( Install deceleration lanes on • I Construct.decelerations lanes at ! Mobility i Efficient 1-3.1, PW
r Lakes and Byron Nelson I Southlake Blvd at Southridge the intersections of Southlake I Mobilityd 3.3 y g + Infrastructure, �` � ,
MT42 ',Traffic flow on Southlake Blvd is I Lakes Pkwy and Byron• + Blvd(FM 1709)and Southridge I Cl,C2 • �1 Options , 3.5,3.9 1
impeded by motorists turning right I Nelson Blvd. + Lakes Pkwy and Byron:Nelson ( 1' i
d . I onto Southridge Lakes Pkwy and i . II Blvd..Project is under design. I I + I
I.
__a_- L yron Nelson Blvd.. . j! � � _ - - IL 1.
I . 11 Electric Vehicle Recharge Stations II Continue to explore p Continue to explore a' Mobility,B6 .1' Efficient 16.2,': . I PDS.
++As electric vehicles become more' I .opport }
unities for electric '1.opportunities for electric vehicle:] Mobility' 7.3,7:6 _! ;
7j popular,demand for charging- I vehicle recharge stations in I; recharge stations.in public and ,:l( IY'Options' ii
MT44 1
li stations within Southlake will public and private I'II_private development where 1t I; 1
'I continue to increase. development where I1 appropriate. I 1`
appropriate. iy
' w. .. j I : 18. il.
SH 114 Improvements—Frontage it Design and engineering and Design and engineering and the. .,Mobility, j YEfficient •1 i 3.1, PW .
. Road between Dove and W I the installation of traffic 1 installation of traffic signals at i Infrastructure 1 Mobility i 3.6, fi
iI Kirkwood/Intersection signals at the SH 114 and W. Il the SH 114 and W.Kirkwood li Cl,C2-. j Options 3.8;
I. Improvements and signalization at .Il Kirkwood intersection have II. intersection have been 1;. �( 3.10
II SH114/Kirkwood j1_been completed. ++`.completed. t - 1' 6:1
Traffic volumes have increased on 1. I" • II
1 -Dove St.and W.Kirkwood Blvd. i Complete construction of• I•Complete construction of the }I
j with development in the area and - ;, the SH 114'frontage road 1 frontage road and remaining 1� , '
MT46 I.are expected to increase further {j and intersection i intersection improvements. . ; )• . . 1
with future development of the. ;i improvements per the + 1 ;
( t Wilkes property. approved engineering plan. 1I ' 11 ,3 3�
j� •' Construction of the frontage 11.. 1 11 i
droad willallow employees11 i
.
I I .and patrons'of nearby 'l 11 1
I
! i1 ; businesses access to SH 114 1 �
(
..I
t iI 11.without having to navigate o I�1 j
g II JI local roads. j�` - _� _ . . _�, i .I - I
Ordinance No. 1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 69
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
Ref. VGO Priority Responsible
No. Description/Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link Tie Tier Department
' i! Shady Oaks/Highland Intersection Evaluate intersection ,+ Evaluate the final analysis of Mobility, ii Efficient 3.1, PW
,, Improvements ' improvement options and ', improvement options and !+ Infrastructure `i•Mobility ,j 3.6, • .i
,. Increased traffic has reduced the implement recommended . I' 'include incorporation of !I CI C2 • 1' Options 13.8, - j . ' '
MT51• t level of service of the Shady ., improvements if determined ,; feedback from Coventry Manor - ;i 3.10 11 2 .jE
Oaks/Highland intersection. - , necessary. :, HOA representatives. Construct ;' , 6.1 .•. : • :
' intersection improvements only ;1
— - -- -- '; if determined necessary. — —In Conjunction with TXDOT— Conduct a study to ,I Based on study findings—create i! Mobility, 'I Efficient 13.1, �' p PW •
.' Conduct a Study on SH114 Main ' determine cost and a CIP project request and project I; Infrastructure Mobility 3.6,
' •,i Lane Expansion and Ramp II construction feasibility. I timeline for the.implementation . C1,C2 • Options 3.8, $. ,
Reversals Between Kimball Avenue of the project. , 3.10
' and White Chapel Boulevard 6.1
, Reversing ramps will allow for r
'
increased accessibility to properties • H • {;- •
I along the frontage road;improve I, .1
MT52 " safety by moving the traffic ;j •
:
"weaving area"between an II
j entrance ramp and exit ramp from ! • '
i - f
the main lanes to the frontage H ' • ;
! road,where speeds and volumes ,� i; i; �j t •
;I are lower;and reduce traffic ;I -• 'I
`I congestion at intersections by i� 4 ;; I
• I, . .I
!I allowing through traffic to access i
the hi hwa
i'
gY — — — — — —' --
Ordinance'No 1075-C,Adopted December7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 70
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
•.'O
O
Southlake 3 I'IL{f_ f:ei— i
Thoroughfare •�f�(-- 7
Recommendations _',--� . '•,
• Tier1 ��-. ,. (V-4f_ •
i,•-.r ' ,. .I
lrLl ji 'r!
:a . 114, t-"'dal--�
• Tier 2 , -;X; ' 1l,.,,,,��..-
• l,�'I,�, --E ra�LJ�ty„y
..... 11_;4_ .. it�.—_ark__.,--- '�
r i i -1, .�i . t j'r ill;--' c.:4 d i
b 'L'
I,�, .`.i...,... . , �,LJU :,ti.MT51—r...j{_' -`II -. ..„.. _DUt�_iI_-_5�.vvvv..
1,
` ' r
' lI._:=,; � . Gi 3'�Li ' �...`II .` 4 l IC.
jam_. �.�
-`; �' ,jig _1 'J+.�, • ,7L_;,-..1I•� .` l,l •II' _ -'u
•: I i1 i f J 1�f� �~/' nI`'-,li L sir! IL i u��s—�' L_1E '�_.s9.
11 14�1i l.. ai CIA, JJ `� ] A-1 `veil /' .11
!L cJ p '1171 I,[� ! ���--�L I.. ,u2JLiL�!f 1 • 1('
-=,` I 41�1 I a,1il }t!'' Jly2,41uF /' it L.7.L -- --�IF i1,: ,f 1. • 1
I -,,.--'-"' ,I{{Ir'r {rJi::;ii:„i f.—_: r''vJ J --:_��1 i�.-,I_'-.iC_,_i, ;� ,Li
Ir- 1i 1l';I 1[sl,� '1 1,�L]11. I l': '_,Iqi-;- N,-1 1 r . -..�1 L.r�I-.,.
-1G.'- r, - 1I'r.. t. l;i '1^'_JI i!"+`1 Al of cL.s."]r 1011111J.7u _lu ,
-1Ali - -1- k =,a -,I ` „ . 6,c� tip_' 66
II
1;
91'1e �,l: .1 t.i''' wr: of .t .1 : .
,
0
Ordinance No. 1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 71
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation/Description Intersection(s) Link VGO Tier
i
IC1. Add crosswalk signs to all i ;i 1!
it crosswalks. li !� °'
' IC1 II IC3. Add curb ramps with I !I Mobility, li
IC3 lI detectable warning surfaces for i Continental Blvd @ White Chapel Blvd II Infrastructure, E 3.2 1
i; C1,C2 If
I the north,east and westbound ;; IT I
approaches lam_— ---_� _ ___1
1l Investigate need to build out to a it i!
li two-lane roundabout, needs ! { Mobility, '
; IC80 i ' Continental Blvd @ White Chapel Blvd i' Infrastructure, I, 3.1,3.9 3
;1 further study for geometric layout p ?
li and ROW Impacts ,I — i___ Cl,C2 it --
IC2. Add curb ramps to the i' ?,
;:, northwest and southwest corners ° i
' IC2 `I IC13. Install two directional curb I, Mobility, ij
Carroll Ave @ Highland St/Kirkwood Blvd ! Infrastructure, 3.3 1
IC13 �, ramps aligned with crosswalks on ,1 l� Cl,C2 Sf
Ei the northeast and southeast
corners -- — o
— --- ___I—; • Investigate option of i II j
s. installation of roundabout or ill ,1
!i intersection signalization
t€ Mobility, 11
il
' IC74 • Investigate need to construct a II Carroll Ave @ Highland St/Kirkwood Blvd II Infrastructure, I, 3.1,3.9 i 3
!t right turn bay on the +i Ii C1,C2 I
westbound approach (Interim II 1'
Improvement)_ _-- -- _ _-_ _______ _—_-- �" --J
gl IC4. Add curb ramps with I'
o if
i; detectable warning surfaces on II 1, t'
i. the northwest and southwest I l; Mobility,
IC4 corners ;; Peytonville Ave/Southridge Lakes Pkwy @ Infrastructure, ;, 3.3 1
IC14 Peytonville Ave/Raven Bend Ct t1
IC14. Install two directional curb ,, Cl,C2
'I ramps on the northeast and is I'
}4 southeast corners li I �_ _ i` J
_ �_ _ JL___ _u _ m. _ _ IL
!i ICS. Add curb ramps with —_ - ',' it Mobility' 4,
IC5 .i detectable warning surfaces to the {: Shady Oaks Dr @ Highland St/Turnberry j; Infrastructure, f; 3.3 1
i 1C17 li three remaining corners IC17. ; Ln is Cl,C2 !'
;—Move crosswalk in front of the _ _______ u _._-___ i'— __I _J
Ordinance No. 1075-C,Adopted Decer'nber 7;2021 [SOUTH LAKE 2035] 72
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation/Description Intersection(s) VGO
Link k Tier
;, stop sign and install two I; 1
' directional curb ramps on the
i'
southwest corner i __
r
ii j -- — -- -- Mobility, i
Install curb ramps for all
IC12 11 I' Continental Blvd @ Peytonvllle Ave Infrastructure, ;' 3.9 1
l; approaches,signing and striping _ __ _ Cl,C2 it
IC18 Investigate need for-intersection :i Mobility,
IC75 improvements. I, Continental Blvd @ Byron Nelson Pkwy �; Infrastructure, i, 3.2 ( 1
C1,C2 '`
I' Rebuild appropriate pedestrian I Mobility, '
IC32 accommodations per completed i' Continental Blvd @ Byron Nelson Pkwy 1 Infrastructure, 3.3 1
' intersection study
i' C1,C2
1 IC27. Provide curb ramps on the l
IC27 three corners that do not currently ; , Mobility,
have curb ramps. Dove Rd @ Shady Oaks Dr Infrastructure, ' 3.9 1
IC34 is
;, IC34. Rebuild directional curb Cl,C2 ,
V ! I
_- '' ramps on the southeast corner.
i; Rebuild appropriate pedestrian is ', Mobility, ;
I IC33 ii accommodations for modified I, Continental Blvd @ Carroll Ave i', Infrastructure, , 3.3 ; 3
roundabout layout C1,C2
Investigate need to construct a i' - ;
1, two-lane roundabout, needs ^' I Mobility,
IC76 further study for geometric layout Continental Blvd @ Carroll Ave : Infrastructure, ;', 3.1,3,9 2
C1,C2 `
- :Land ROW impacts
IC36. Reconstruct two directional 1 '
curb ramps aligned with i `
IC36 1, crosswalks on all corners Mobility,
,r I; Carroll Ave @ Zena Rucker Rd Infrastructure, 3.2 1
IC72 i; IC72. Place ped push buttons at
Cl,C2
'' landing of each barrier free I,
a! pedestrian ram L i,- ___ _-____
IC41 ;' IC41. Relocate PED push buttons I' Mobility, 1!
IC42 jl to ADA compliant landings. ^i
I; Continental Blvd @ Davis Blvd I, Infrastructure, it 3.3 .1
IC44 1'1 IC42. Relocate PED signal heads ij {; Cl,C2 1'
IC71 closer to crosswalk.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 73
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation/Description Intersection(s) Link VGO Tier
— —
•
IC44. Remove spilt phasing for f
minor approaches and run
protected+permitted for all
approaches
IC71. Walt until construction at
Davis and FM 1709 is finished,
then follow up with additional
L.]
traffic counts to identify additional
1.
Ii Infrastructure improvements.
IC43. Relocate the pedestrian Ii
push button to ADA compliant 1
landings
IC55. Retime for eastbound traffic #
IC43 on Continental Blvd to have more Mobility,
IC55 Continental Blvd @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.3 1
time
IC56 IC56. Right turn overlap for i Cl,C2
northbound right turns with
westbound left turns, Install sign
prohibiting westbound u-turns
Replace detectable warning Mobility,
IC45 surfaces to cover full width of curb SH 114 Eastbound Frontage Road @ State Infrastructure, 3.9 1
St
ramp on both existing curb ramps JI ci,cz
• Investigate need to construct i
two directional curb ramps
aligned with crosswalks on all Mobility,
IC78 corners Continental Blvd @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.1,3.9 i
C1,C2
• investigate need to extend R
westbound left turn bay length [ €
___A
l • investigate need to construct a
roundabout,requires further Mobility,
(C81' study for gedmefrlc layout aril Dove Rd @Shady Oaks Dr - Infrastructure, 3.1,3.9 3
ROW Impact and coordination C1,C2
i I with TxDOT
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 74
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation/Description Intersection(s) Link Tier
Tier
• Investigate need to construct Mobility,
IC82 three curb ramps;two for the Dove Rd @White Chapel Blvd Infrastructure, ! 3,1,3.9 3
southbound approach and one C1,c2
i for the eastbound approach
TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation Intersection(s) Link VGO
Tier
Moity
IC6 Change eastbound and westbound Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastbilructu,re, 1 3.2 1
` left turns to protected only C1,C2
Change minor street phasing from Mobility,
IC7 s
plit phase to protected+ Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln Infrastructure, 3.6,3.9 1
permitted , Cl,C2
, _ . .. .._ . _
_ Consider flashing beacon system Mobility,
IC8 for crosswalks for school children Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @Commerce St/
! i Infrastructure, 3,3 1
since traffic signal isn't warranted Gateway Dr C1,C2
- �- --- - _-,_ - _. - - • � - - - -- - - - -- -- - -Moblllty, — - -,-
Give eastbound left turn
1 movement more time
IC9 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)@ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3,2 � 1
i l i f C1,C2 ,
• Give eastbound left turn Mobility, I
IC10 movement more time from the Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.2 1
westbound through E c1,C2
_ ! ,
ii Give southbound left turn phase I ,
Moblllty
I and westbound left turn phase Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville.
IC11 Infrastructure, 3.2 1
1 more time during the school peak Ave C1,C2
in-a special school thing-plan -- I " I
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 75
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation Intersection(s) VGO
Link Tier
` Mobility, i1
IC20 ', Prohibit u-turns on all approaches ; Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 1
I' Cl,C2
0 I' Mobility, li
IC21 Ij Prohibit westbound left turns from 1, Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave I' Infrastructure, i 3.9 1
Main St onto Carroll Ave I; I: C1,C2
' Provide Audible Pedestrian System I, Mobility, 9
IC22 , (APS) push buttons for the ' Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd ; Infrastructure, 3,2, 1
eastbound approach crossing i C C1, 2
' • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Byron i.
Nelson Pkwy/Diamond Blvd
' • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave 1'
• Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central ;',
Ave '
j 1
:1 i, • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce 1 '
is 1, St/Gateway Dr i'
i ,, !i • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Nolen Dr l'
1' Provide count down PED signal • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville ' Mobility,
IC23 i' Infrastructure, 3.2,3.3 1
,i heads for all crossings Ave Cl,C2 ;,
`, !' • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks i
Dr
f • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Village ,
Center Dr ,1
E !
• Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Waterford
i Dr/Southridge Lakes Pkwy
, 1 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White r
! Chapel Blvd
Provide count down PED signal j Mobility, ;
IC24 heads for EB and WB approaches it Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln Infrastructure, !, 3.3 1
l; C1,C2
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 76
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation Intersection(s) VGO
Link Tier
Provide count down PED signal V _ Moblllty,
IC25 heads for the eastbound approach Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd Infrastructure, 3,3 1
crossing Cl,C2
Provide curb ramps, push buttons, ____ a Mobility,
count down PED signal heads and Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Watermere Dr
IC28 Infrastructure, 3.2,3.9 1
� I striped crosswalk for westbound /Jellico Cir C1,C2
I a_proach C l
If Provide one curb ramp for the [Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce St/ Mobility,
IC30 northeast and southeast corners Gateway Dr Infrastructure, 3.9 1
C1,C2
Provide two directional curb I Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce St/ Moblllty,
IC31 ramps on the northwest and Gateway Dr Infrastructure, 3,9 1
1 southwest corners Cl,C2
Reconstruct ramp on outside of Mobility,
IC35 f slip turn lane on northwest corner Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 1
L__ C1,C2
._- - - • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Byron
1 Nelson Pkwy/Diamond Blvd
• Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central
Ave
• Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce
Reconstruct two directional curb Mobility,
IC36 ramps aligned with crosswalks on St/Gateway Dr Infrastructure, 3.2 1
• Southlake Blvd(FM 1709) @ Nolen Dr
all corners l Cl,C2
I • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd
• Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Village
Center Dr
• Southlake Blvd(FM 1709) @ White
I' �_. _ Cha el Blvd'
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 77
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation Intersection(s) VGO
Link Tier
_ —"-.- - Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @Pearson Ln _ -- e-_
Reconstruct two directional curb • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonvllle Mobility,
1 IC37 ramps aligned with crosswalks on Ave Infrastructure, 3,2 1
each corner • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Waterford Cl,C2
Dr/Southridge Lakes Pkwy
Reconstruct two directional curb T - -- —_.___ - — -
--
1 ( -t
ramps aligned with crosswalks on Mobility,
IC38 the northeast and southeast Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks Dr Infrastructure, . 3,2 1
i Cl,C2 1
corners E f
Reconstruct two directional curb y F
IC39 ramps aligned with crosswalks on i Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3,2 1
the southeast and southwest 11
11 corners IL I Cl,C2 11
11 Reconstruct two directional crb ( Mobility, I u
IC40 11 ramps on all corners aligned with i Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.2 1
' crosswalks }I Cl,C2 IL
Restrict northbound and - _ --� - - "� --- -• - _"" Mobllity,
IC46 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Nolen Dr Infrastructure, 1 3,9 1
southbound u-turns ci,Cz 1
I
Restrict northbound and Mobility,
(C47 I southbound u turns by Installing signs 6 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel Infrastructure, 3,9 1
I Blvd , C1,C2
Retime and fine tune to be . I.
- __.__ _ . I . - —I
. _
1 coordinated with FM 1709 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Davis Blvd/ Mobility,
IC53 Infrastructure,corridor upon construction Randol Mill Ave 3.9 1
` C1,C2 1
I completion _t
- _ - ` - - • - - - - -• Southlake Blvd (FM @ 1709) Byron I-_ - - __" -
Mobility,
{ Retime FM 1709 corridor after_ ...Nelson Pkwy/Diamond Blvd
IC543,9 1
Davis/Randol Mill construction • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central infrastructure,_
Cl,C2
Ave '
,
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 78
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
-
TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation Intersection(s) Link VGO Tier
' 1' • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce '
{j St/Gateway Dr „ ,I
, • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball
' !; !1 Ave II' '
11 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Nolen Dr I 1�
, ,, r • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln , i
I' • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville
Ave I 1.
' • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks ,
IP Dr I
• Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd ; I
is • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Village t I.
Center Dr
' • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Waterford l;
, i; Dr/Southrldge Lakes Pkwy
1 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @
i, I' Watermere Dr/Jellico Clr
1
Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel ; 1,
1.
Blvd
• Run a southbound right/ t; i Mobility,
IC57 6' eastbound left overlap and 1 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave ;, Infrastructure, 3.9 1.
;' restrict eastbound u-turns 11 Cl,C2 ;,
J`
• Run a southbound right turn/
eastbound left turn overlap • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball i, Mobility,
IC58 Infrastructure, 3.9 1
and restrict u-turns on all ! Ave
-- approaches - - I !t Cl,C2
• Run Protected+Permitted for I, II
minor approaches(phasing : • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central
i Mobility,
IC59 '' changes might require a new Ave ; Infrastructure, 3.9 1
!l , Cl,C2 I, ,
cabinet)— -- - - --
Ordinance No.1075 C,Adopted December.7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 79
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master'Plan
TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
.
Strategic Priority
ID. Recommendation Intersection(s) Link VGO Tier
;" • Develop special school plan l ii Mobility, ill Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks
IC60 i; with modified traffic timing it 1 Infrastructure, 11 3.9 1
I splits �L_Dr I` Cl,C2 Ii
pi-__`____ _
k #i Ii • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Byron 11 IE
,`, ii Nelson Pkwy/Diamond Blvd `
11 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave 1 �`
; i • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central !v P
i ;
I i
11 II • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce 1 }
r St/Gateway Dr I
11 l; • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Nolen Dr ii III
i; • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln 1, i;
•
i • Place ped push buttons at i. Mobllity,
IC72 I • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville I i
I Infrastructure, i 3.2,3.3 ?-
landing of each barrier free Ave i 2 II pedestrian ramp • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks 1� Cl,C2 l
I i Dr 11
!1
1 ; • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd i I1
• Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Village 11 iE
lI ii
1! Center Dr
II Ip • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Waterford ; y'
I Dr/Southrldge Lakes Pkwy
l;
I i • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White i i
-----1--------
___ Chapel Blvd 'i
it • Place ped push buttons at yI�
IC73 �w i
Mobility, 11 I
landing of each barrier free t Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave !' Infrastructure, ; 3,2,3.3 ' 2
pedestrian ramp for southeast ,I Cl,C2
11 a and southwest corners 11 __Ti. •_
1, • Consider extension of ;; ii 1; u i
11 southbound right turn bays II Mobility, li
IC84 I either by ROW acquisition or ;' Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave 11 Infrastructure, ,I 3,9 3
lane shifting option shown in j II C1,C2 I
_; -past Kimley Horn project _i_ _ IL___ !I
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 80
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations
Strategic Priority
ID Recommendation Intersection(s) Link VGO Tier
i • investigate widening of _ -
_ - _
Intersection to the north to
construct dual eastbound and
I westbound left turn bays
___ -.- � -,-_ - - ._-__-- _ - - _ _ -- - ___-- -- -- _ _-- - _ _________
• sicted only
eastbound and westbound left Mobility,
IC85 turns due to inadequate sight Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @Central Ave Infrastructure, 3,9 3
Cl,C2
distance
• Investigate construction of
northbound left turn bay(160')
and restripe northbound
approach to left and through-
right as seen in plans provided Mobility,
IC86 by the City Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln Infrastructure, 3,9 3
• Investigate construction of Cl,C2
southbound left turn bay(130')
and restripe southbound
approach to left,through,and
right
• Investigate construction of _
southbound right turn bay and
( restripe the original right turn
lane to be a through lane(cost
{ prohibitive) Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel Mobility, ,
IC87 Infrastructure, I 3,9 3
• Investigate extension of Blvd 1
Cl,C2 (1
northbound left turn bay i
Iapproximately 100'to create a I
I ribbon median back to back
with another left turn bay
Ordinance No. 1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 81
•
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Bicycle Facility Plan Recommendations
Tier 1
Roadway Description Recommendation
i 1. W. Bob Jones Road __ IL —_ Between TM. King and N.White Chapel ;L—_ -_ Signed Route —;
1 22.__T.W. King Road _ _ _ II Between Between Kirkwood and W. Bob Jones __;i-___ Signed Route__
3. Dove Road !s Between Westlake city limits and Grapevine city limits-- ; Signed Route(Existing)*
4. Carroll Avenue _Jl_ Between Continental and Burney Lane JAL _-Signed Route(Existing)* I
' 5. Burney Lane �i' _ i Between Carroll and Midway Drive - JL�_ _ Signed Route
[6, Midway Drive Between Burney Lane and Grapevine city limits Ju___ _ Signed Route _ _
7._Continental Boulevard/Union Church _!! _ Between Pearson and d_Kimball - - -- ------ - -SignedSigned Route(Existing)* ,
18. Brurnlow Avenue _ _if—` _— Between Continental and S.H. 26 _,... __— Signed Route(Existing)*
iI 9. _Peytonville Avenue __IL Between Continental and Dove IL Signed Route(Existing)* _
10. Randol Mill Avenue(F_M. 1938) _ _ Between Florence and Westlake citylimits Signed Route(Existing)*___ __1
11. Florence Road i' Between F.M. 1938 and Pearson � _Signed Route
' 12. Pearson Lane ,' Between Union Church and Florence IE Signed Route R
L.13. White Chapel Boulevard "` -- Between Continental and northern roadway terminus I Signed Route(Existing)* °
Tier -
Roadway Description Recommendation
i 14. Brumlow Avenue iL._-__ -___ _ Between Continental and S.H, 26 Dedicated Bike Lane j
j 15, Kirkwood Boulevard _—_ __;[_ f _—__ Between Kimball and S.H. 114 _ —`Signed Route** _ 1
*Existing and new signage locations should be reviewed/reassessed to ensure optimal signage placement
**Signage should be placed on Kirkwood only after a continuous roadway section is completed(Kimball Ave. to SH 114)
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 82
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
LEGEND
Signed Route(Tier III)*
Bicycle Facility [ ..,. *Signage should be placed on
Kirkwood only after a continuous
Master Plan
11-- ;:,:,7„:: 7.,,,'-.,: :•., ..---.....,.
•••_ •
i-kjr,., rvoiamdwbaalyl Asveectitoonsiiis cioiTopleted
,kl ..--,z, , .,1 III Signed(Tier I)
"" ..,” '.*:!;.-.11 r• VI Dedicated Bike Lane(Tier Ill)
irp , 4 .--1 III Signed Routes(Tier I)
.i ,:;-...-',,
:.. ."4,:.. T14 F3.,. ..d,4.,;i.,...,..s,.
''
4'..-.',- -44 F• ' . 1 t . ',:__,-.....- ?,E3 "
.-,-,
P1;1 .-." _ : ''-';'.---- r.,,,,c;„=1.--
a*, . , .- .4: `i}- : -...:11i ji_9, 311"
iF 7.--.6m1 -
\ - cr
4f . - .
11 . . .‘ . \--.,. :. ___:_lE JuLl.
...,,._1•.. , : .,ifl---• . . 7' .• i
7 .. t_vii.,../c--,ir:dy.-_,--,sil,; cl--,,.' , '-'1 • • I
1 • ,__, ,--,--., i!',. , JI-1
'. 1'-- tj7,';,2-1':---1 1-3 sZ.,:;- . 1:1
. . ; r • ILlfiK.. . II
\
II . if-r7-ii_'„:1 ''`.-ff\j'l *1-rZil':•.-'. '_. .... LC-''1,
"ji E.1_74-. ILI Wtt 1[1:::- - r'• -'sfc:.: \ ---7Lijbl .,,,,,I1
'-, ' •-Y. -----_-sit 6A,E3.,(arv:z.k w-,:*2,,,,,,'-,N.on ,-.,. -,414-tam - c7.F. . .......„. ,,,,
11
- „ ,- ,,,g744f,49:47:77.77 7.---77-7-
1,-;,.___,.-•-17-...---. ,:it ourm, •- •: -,`, -1i-.i.„---•,--- -:-- 1:'s
- -T.0 E,--'. • --,,,,,,,z.-_ tiw 4.-•.-.,,1.
p,c,- ' :WM:',,3`.: - / . •;°'-:--11 cd.E':.i„.:,,,, Cl„_.' ... `4,1M, ikti-7-.I'i.,-17--;ii.-7.11
'''''-?--1,T-t_,-14;4.:2 ),..fr•- ,,. `" _ /431 ---' -!1-1-: '6.: Itt,,,Ni",/,T*1 --.-?;=,-;,--7-1--•
410 ...!..!-,....-1-1mIrv,-,, Tr, = r.•:?-: j.-... ve...1.--1-7 ..„,ip___ __.,.. ...D :4. .,F L. 4'" ...,-jjLL • '
= •fi'll.-:'-it-i----Ag4-'/4 itki'''.<;:-,-,,..€.1.F- , - , 1---::-- -,. : '''-•ii -1-PecE5--/--..,_.,
:" 'LVElEzlif, 'ikr-1 -1-.1: zircAlla JI .-.____/11 r :'•,,,J:citni•%IL—
':_ri' - -- _ -• `---7--)Iiir- • :- :......:_r--,---:---1.,.\
[II - • • ,.-11 • : ' .5-5",;.-s L.,.•F., Itilc,,-,,- $ - ,-,i-!..-- ,.- 1,.... ,-.-,/ t-c- -,--1 :,...A
, -i fil. I, •t, ... :. ..A.g? •-•.-, ---1
1-1-__11, CI 'Llt:._'1,,, tilio .• r-ttr'G.,.. c-q--, . ..t '.-11E.p.-._.q.,-:: ;: fl.f-, ,,,,i4 , _. ,:. ,.-0:0 ,I
irj
,'IC. ..,ALL=..-..-1
fl• "i'Lli'crIIPQ- I ---'71'1 cw-- - ii (LL---f - r
_..._ , :. N —'t !.• • • `. Ai, !. l'Efjj? •ctit,, E...; .• ••i al r-it, r_-_-_,..-- ..
• .ft,---1,44' ..,:r lic-,isk-I'WLiela'.1..eY\EN'- "--0 .1.411[..15iiiTil H-.-c:
* ' ILL i'n i''''', '-iiZrir3 61..2V.i. - 'I[3 24, • ).F',...,F-F.41 .:,-.. ..... - :: -.- - ...,
,
r-')-- (C,--- -''., 1U1Jg --.-q, 11 li--• "•-,
1L-g ri .--.0-4_;-^--.A'4, : :f li ;: i \IN,-. N. •'.".-7...' F711 ': •" .•'.,„0'
..d 11.-A .`,-.,„fl ...')ff-----.5-1./... '• ,,„_.,P ; • e/
Vc---\-----'.2N:, i.".^.(•(, : t.!el'..•••••v.,-.. -,N,...., - - -1,, ----- - - -
--- ----------------- ---- - - ' ---- - -- -
'',...
ti •
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] 83
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
Tier 1 Only
ID Primary Description Issues/Comments Length& Priority Strategic Link VGO
Street/Location Estimated Cost Tier
---_. _ - - — -- -
North side connecting dead
7* Union Church- ends from 2651 Union Existing fence Is outside of property line, Heavy tree 374 LF 1 Mobility, 3.1&
north side Church Road to Venice clearing needed. $39,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
Avenue(Siena Addition',
I-,_ _. —_ _ -_._'•--. - North side from Chesapeake 3.1&
Union Church- 859 IF Mobility,
7* Park sidewalk to Watermere Trees;utilities, 1
north side _property, $77,000 infrastructure,C2 3,3
s
North side from Watermere
Union Church- - 416 IF _
j Mobility, 3,1&
7* north side to Venice Avenue(Siena ROW/Easement issues. $62 000 1 Infrastructure C2 3,3
1 Addition . '
Silicon Drive-east East side from 500 5.Nolen 1F 460 LF I Mobility, 3.1&
58 side Drive to Exchange Boulevard. j jL$42,000 1 l Infrastructure,C2 1 3.3
r- - -I
304 South Peytonville From Boardwalk to Elks Lane -Would need to take down wall;heavy 1 tree clearing 860 LF - 1 Mobility, 3, & I
Avenue �1-connect gap to west side, needed. $80,000 infrastructure,C2 3.3 1
_ _®_ . West side from Exchange ' .- _—
_ __ _ --- - -- _ 3.1&
South Nolen Drive 439 LF Mobility,
308 _west side Boulevard north to connect Existing landscaping. $40,000 1 Infrastructure,C2 I 3,3
to existing sidewalk. II
South White East side,from Big Bear
- 466 Chapel Boulevard- Creek bridge(Colleyvllle)to Existing landscaping;trees, Will provide a 2150 LF 1 Mobility, 3.1&
east side the offices at 1211 S.White connection to Colleyvllle s sidewalk network. $125,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
Chapel Boulevard.
-i Davis Boulevard- East side missing gaps near Slope is a little steep In this location: South end ties 350 LF Mobility, t 3.1&
r-__1 470 1 east side Sunset Way. _1 Into a sidewalk with concrete slope, l $19,000 1 Infrastructure,C2 1 3,3 1
t Connect The Cliffs Park
482 Sunrise Ranch Road sidewalk to neighborhood 1 Recommendation from the Parks,Recreation,and 1 140 IF 1 Mobility, _ 3,1&
sidewalk at 3611 Sunrise I Open Space Master Plan, $8,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
,P Ranch Road. I I
l Byron Nelson Gap along the west side of I
i 483* Parkway-west Byron Nelson Parkway,south 1 Existing landscaping. 0 LF 1 Mobility, 3,1&
i side t of F.M.1709. $6,000 Infrastructure,C2 I 3.3 1
Westbound frontage road 1; Re ulres coordination with TXDOT and utilityI
S.H.114 Frontage gaps west and east of Kimball 1 q • 2100 LF A Mobility, 3.1&
486 I companies, Will need to-rebuild ramps and relocate , 1 -
Road westbound Avenue from 2000 E.S.H.114 $210,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
( to 2540 E.S.H,114. traffic signal poles.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 203S] 84
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
Tier 1 Only
Primary Length& Priority
ID Description Issues/Comments Strategic Link VGO'
Street/Location Estimated Cost Tier
'` North side from sidewalk '
East Dove Road— ' terminus west of Lonesome ROW,drainage,trees,utility relocation. `1 4080 LF Mobility, ; 3,1&
491 „ 1, Construction is dependent on the right of way 1
1 ' north side '1 Dove(1497 East Dove Road) I ;i $1,200,000 i Infrastructure,C2 I 3,3 j
1 i{ to North Kimball Avenue. acquisition and funding availability. t� { !, f
g South side from the Carroll 1220 LF Mobility East Highland I, , l 3.1& ,
492 Street—south side I' Middle School driveway to , ROW,drainage,trees. ! 1
{ • $163,000 i , Infrastructure,C2 3.3
L__ ___-- I_- j� 2149 East Highland Street.
� I
* Segment prioritized due to potential inclusion in a planned CIP project in the vicinity if funding and site conditions allow.
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
Tier a Ter 3
Primary Priority
# Description issues/Comments Length Strategic Link VGO
Street/Location Tier
North side from existing
Union Church— 1 Requires pedestrian bridge to be designed by i; 570 LF Mobility, 3,1&
7 , sidewalk adjacent to Siena 2
(; north side engineer. $278,000 Infrastructure C2 3.3
— I Addition to Davis Boulevard. -- _ _ I!_ _. __,'_ __
il West side from Brookshire {; 1, i I'
21* I Crooked Lane— l; Drive to Southlake Sports Chain link fence may need to be moved back. I420 LF I
2 Mobility, {l 3,1&
1, west side i' $39,000 Infrastructure,C2 1 3,3
•— — L__ Complex. — — — -- --- — — — — -- — J- ---J
ii 0 East side of Pearson Lane ,,
Ii '' adjacent to 101 North ' l' 41
Pearson Lane— " ; 540 LF Mobility, , 3.1&
70* I' Pearson Lane;includes Ditch would conflict with beginning of sidewalk. 2
east side entrance to Chesapeake Place " $51,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
I• ' adjacent to Pearson Lane. I ' __
' 71* i Chesapeake Lane Entrance to Chesapeake Place ; 50 LF Mobility, ,1 3,1&
—south side adjacent to Pearson Lane $6,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3__
Continental North side from Davis I
Boulevard to existing i' 638 LF Mobility, , 3.1&
76a* 1, Boulevard—north ,i sidewalk adjacent to i' ,1 $58,000 2 Infrastructure,C2 io 3.3
l{ side {! I
1 Woodbury subdivision, '
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 85
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
� Tier 2 and
. . - . • - _ . - Tier 3
,
# Primary Description Issues/Comments Length Priority Strategic Link VGO
Street/Location Tier
West side of Crooked Lane I'
Crooked Lane- adjacent to Southlake Sports 1171 LF Mobility, 3,1&
86* west side Complex to East Continental $77,000 2 - : Infrastructure,C2 3,3
Boulevard. ;. .
Existing road Is split 1"nto two independentsectlons, - 3.1&Parkwood Drive- From Byron Nelson Parkway 575 LF Mobllity,
(i 8B north/east side to F.M.1709. Would need to relocate railing within the cul-de-sac $124,000 Z Infrastructure,C2 3.3
to make room for the sidewalk.
-.._.--- -North side from Johnson . 3,1&Johnson Road- Requires sidewalk easement. Relocate fencing 548 LF Mobility,
93 1 Place Estates to Randol Mill
north side Avenue, behind proposed sidewalk. I $56,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
North side of Turnberry Lane
98* Turnberry Lane- from Shady Oaks Drive to 660 LF i Mobility, 3.1&
north existing sidewalk east of 1 $39,000 i i :2 Infrastructure,C2 3,3
{ Suffolk Court. i i .,
- 'II North side from Rldgecrest f
•
Oak Pointe Lane- 170 LF + . 0 Mobility, 3,1&
101 Drive to existing sidewalk on I 2
nort Oak Pointe Lane, $12,DOD L Infrastructure,C2 3.3
East Dove Street- r South side from Winfield " - • 977 LF I ••• Mobility, III
I-1155—* ROW,drainage,trees. I --2.
�south side Estates to Estes Parks ` _$80,000 , . - Infrastructure,C2 ILJ
_ ----- -- -- -- - -On the west sideof North - . __ ._- _.. ,-_ _.. _.. .. --. - __
North White White Chapel Boulevard from __
the existing crosswalk south To be included with the bridge project on North 2443 LF + Mobility, 3,1&
306 Chapel Boulevard of Wingate Lane to the White Chapel Boulevard. $150,000 I• - .' Infrastructure,C2 3,3
-west side existing sidewalk on The Cliffs 1
Park property. _ I i a_��_._.-..-_J�
The north end of the segment will tie Into existing °( + j
East side from West iI
1 Davis Boulevard- sidewalk with a concrete slope, This area Is steep 1010 LF ;- " _ Mobility, 3,1& I
Li469 ! Continental Boulevard to 855 n` • .2
east side and may require engineering design for drainage I $91,000 1 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
Davis Boulevard, i and grading. I ,_-___ �
East side from the terminus Sidewalk location is near a retaining wall. There is a i.
South Kimball 590 LF Mobility, 3.1&
474 at 165 S.Kimball Avenue to steep cross slope and may require additional 2
Avenue-east side F.M. retaining wall $46,000 •• . Infrastructure,C2 3.3
__ _West side from . Shady - -= `— -_ 3.1&Shady Oaks Drive Requires engineering design due to drainage 1810 LF i • I Mobility,
476a _west side Oaks Drive to Love Henry pattern. $165,000 2. : • Infrastructure,C2 3,3
i Court. g . ..
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 86
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
_Tier 2 and] Tier 3
# Primary Description Issues/Comments Length Priority Strategic Link VGO
Street/Location Tier
Westbound frontage road ' Requires coordination with TXDOT and utility
S.H,114 Frontage I 440 LF i . ? Mobility, 3,1& 1
L481 Road-westbound from North Carroll Avenue to companies, Will need to rebuild ramp and relocate $52,000 , • 2. Infrastructure,C2 3,3
1110 E.S,H,114. j traffic signal pole, I L _;
East side betweenH.S, 114t.
North Carroll 1100 LF i ! Mobility, 3.1&
493 and Johnson Elementary ROW,grading/drainage. - •:2 -
Avenue-east side School. $165,000 - Infrastructure,C2 3,3
Design and construction are dependent on
coordination with the Town of Westlake. Southlake I. . : -
must either have permission to construct the
East side of Randol Mill from
494 !i i Mobllit 3,1&
Randol Mill-east ' sidewalk along Randol Mill Avenue within the Town 2400 IF y,
I Morgan Road to the city ; . -2 .
( side limits. of Westlake or Westlake must have built a sidewalk $650,000 • Infrastructure,C2 3.3
IL__ from Dove Street to the Southlake city Ilmlts, II -
Further,construction is dependent on right of way 6
1.__________
acguisltlon and funding availability. ji . i L______I
I
South Kimball From existing sidewalk east of 1151 LF000 Mobility, 3,1&
15 Avenueside -north SlllconRailroadDrive. $77 to Cotton Belt Trees,signs,easement/ROW. 3
No , Infrastructure,C2 3,3
-
Wirth Carroll From Southcrest Court to 2250 LF Mobility, 3,1&
28 Avenue-west
rI[ ow;grade;potential retaining wall needed, $166,000 3 i
Infrastructure,C2 3,3
5outhridge LekesT From existing sidewalk north Mobllit , 3,1&
32 Parkway-east of Southlake Boulevard to Trees;may require easements/HOA approval; 428 IF 3 y
side Sabine Court segment not critical due to presence of slip streets Infrastructure,C2 3,3
( eLakes 1 ___ _ - . a -_ -- - F"3,1&
_ _ . southrid
33 ; Parkway-east ! From Sabine Court to Brazos 1Trees;may require easements/HOA approval; _, 647 LF JI 3 Mobility, !
_ji side Drive I segment not critical due to presence of slip streets ( Infrastructure,C2 I 3,3
I Southridge Lakes - - -- 1 3 -- - - -- E - - -�
34 Parkway east East side from Brazos Drive to [Trees;may require easements/HOA approval; 352 LF Mobility, 3.1& l
side I Crockett Court ! segment not critical due to presence of slip streets $25,000 Infrastructure,C2 3,3
-
39 l Boru kwoo eve d-east East side from Tyler Street to 11 2295 LF 3 Mobility, 13,1,&
' side the private drive, ' $133,000 Infrastructure,C2 1 3,3
( Kirkwood From private drive to existing 1862 LF Mobility, 3,1&
41 Boulevard- sidewalk east of TW King Easement/ROW. -
$112,000 3 Infrastructure,C2 3,3
east/north side I Road.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 87
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
i • - • • • - • • • -• r- Tie 2 and.] Tier 3
Primary Priority
# Description Issues/Comments Length Strategic Link VGO
Street/Location Tier
f 68 •
east sideLane— 1-Dri accent to 3255 Jordan ss 1 536,000 3 Infrastructlure,C2 �m3 3
le ; __1From klrkwood Boulevard to i
79 T W King—east existing sidewalk adjacent to Grading. $143,0002041 LF 3 Mobility, 13,1&
Lv 1 side y The Cliffs subdivision Infrastructure,C2 3,3
92 Johnson Road - From Trail-tried-Addition Addition to Bar ditch,trees,drainage,ROW. Will require 624 IF 3 -Moblllty, 3,1&
_- ' north side ji Johnson Place Estates �JLpedestrian bridge to be designed by_an engineer. L$294,000 Infrastructure,C2_L3.3 j
SoUthridge Lakes 1 From Brazos Drive to Crockett " 1# 1028 LF Mobility, i 3,1&
115 Parkway—east 3
-side I Court. 11.1 $63,000 Infrastructure,C2 { 3.3 1
144, i East Dove Street— r From White Chapel Boulevard i 2007 LF I Mobility, 13,1&f Would require multiple pedestrian bridges, II
f 3
154 I south side 11111 to Estes Park. it L$693,000 ; Infrastructure,C2 I 3.3_j
I I North side from Shady Oaks• { • i- = - ,
153* f West Highland Drive to White Chapel Pedestrian bridge to be designed by engineer. 11880 LF 3 Mobility, 3,1&
Street—north side ;� Boulevard $459,000 i Infrastructure,C2 3,3
' E North Pe tonville East side from Raven Bend Y 4760 LF 1 Mobility, ii 3.1&
204* � lr Avenue yeast side 1 Court to West Dove Road, ROW;Heavy tree removal. $356,000 I 3 I Infrastructure,C2 l' 3.3 I
From existing sidewalk
205 Brumlow Avenue adjacent to Timarron to ROW,trees;also proposed sidewalk is within a ditch 2227 LF 3 Mobility, 13,1&
—West side existing sidewalk north of S.H. and fencing would need to be relocated, ��$176,000 Infrastructure,C2 3,3
266. _
I Shady Oaks—east I East side from West Highland r • 11 3150 LF } Mobility, 1 3,1&
206 [Heavy tree removal I 3 I r
I
side I, to Love Henry Court. Ii$271,000 w Infrastructure,C2 ,I 3.3 J
- - II South Kimball I South side from Continental 1 3
990 LF Mobility, 3.1&
303
h
Avenue—soth ulevarto railroad/city . Easement/ROW, i side I limit, .} $61,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
-I South Peytonvllle il From Boardwalk to Elks Lane II Would need to take down wall;heavy tree clearing ! 860 LF i Mobility, 1 3,1&
304�I Avenue 1L connect gap to west side. jj needed. II,_$80,000 3 Infrastructure,C2 ii 3.3
— —1; North White d,d; East side from Southlake 948 IF i 3 I Mobility, I 3.1&
305 Chapel Boulevard 11 Boulevard to Emerald 1� To be built with widening.
1 �1—east side [! Boulevard, ;i $62,000 infrastructure,C2 I 3.3 1
r East Dove Road— -North side from S.H,114 to - - - -- - ---- - - - ---- - F-1593 LF Moblllty, 1 3,1&
399 north side French Circle __ _ _ —� I$159,000 3 Infrastructure,C2 I 3,3 I
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 88
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
p .- - , - . . . . . Tier.2 and I Tier 3
# Primary Description Issues/Comments Length Priority Strategic Link VGO
Street/Location Tier
.,ir East Continental 'North side from Byron Nelson 3.1&• i
467 Boulevard-north Parkway to terminus near ROW;would require a bridge over the creek. 3 F Mbilitside tSarah ParkTrail. Infrastructure,C2 3,3outhsideromldelk [$333000
3080 LE Mobllit 3.1&
468 Boulevard-south terminus(near Teaiwood)to ROW;not much room for sidewalk with bar ditch, 3 V.
side Majestic Dance Academy. utility poles,and fences, $475,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
The north end of the segment will tie into existing 3
Davis Boulevard- East side from West ( sidewalk with a concrete slope. This area Is steep 1010 LF Mobility, 3,1&
469 Continental Boulevard to 855
east side and may require engineering design for drainage $91,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
Davis Boulevard. and grading. i
Eastbound frontage road Requires coordination with TXDOT and utility
1 S.H.114 Frontage ®4720 LF Mobility, 3,1& I
1 471 between North Kimball companies. Will need to rebuild ramps and 3
Road-eastbound Avenue and F.M.1709 I relocate traffic signal poles. $338,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
- __ Li- East side from south ._ t -._.._ -a - -
_
•
- - �South Kimball Sidewalk location is near a retaining wall and there 370 IFY Mobility, 3.1&
472 Avenue-east side Kimball Avenue to 175 South is an Inlet between the back of curb and the wall. $20,000 3 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
l ,33 1 Kimball Avenue, I I
( East side from Crooked Lane
South Kimball - Segment crosses rock rip rap near an open back 940 IF Mobility, 3,1&
473 to terminus at Christ Our King 3
Avenue-east side Church. I curb inlet. $81,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
`-North-kiniball- - I West and e-ast side from F.M. ` -_ ------_- ' ___ __ _a - - - --- • 3 3.1&
475 Avenue-west 1709 to eastbound S.H.114 Easement/ROW. $108 LF Mobility,
and east side Frontage Road. $108,000 Infrastructure,C2 3,3
' East side from Bicentennial ._ - 1810 LF- --- - 1 -
Shady Oaks Drive Requires engineering design due to drainage Mobility, 3.1&
476b Park terminus to Love Henry pattern. $165,000(for both 3
_east side infrastructure,C2 3.3
I Court. 1 476a and 476b)__ _ I
East side from the terminus
477 Nsidoelen Drive-east tat 315 South Nolen Drive to 580 IF 3 Mobility, 3.1&
$45,000 infrastructure,C2 3,3
i !1 F.M.1709.
S.H.114 Frontage Westbound frontage road at_ 160 IF 3 Mobility, C 3.1& '
479 A pedestrian bridge will be required.-
E Road-westbound 1 500 E.S.H.114. ,. $249,000 1 Infrastructure,C2 I� 3,3
North Carroll 3,1&
West side from Primrose Lane 220 LF Mobility,480 Avsidenue-west to Del Mar Drive, Easement/ROW. $19,000 i 3 -Infrastructure,C2 3.3 1
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 89
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
.. .. - ` _ - - - - - --Tier 2 ana1 Tier 3
# Primary Description Issues/Comments Length Priority Strategic Link VGO
Street/Location Tier
North Carroll South of Winfield Court;2110 _ 4 200.L{ FOO Mobility, -3.1&
487 Avenue-west
side North Carroll Avenue. Easement/ROW;fence relocation will be necessary. 3 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
f North White Chapel 3.1&
•
Imperial Avenue.
490 East Highland- Boulevard to 170'west of Will require relocation of utilities due to limited 1300 LF 3 Mobillty,
Esouth side ROW, $131,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
N-K orth White--- East side from --w Kirkwood - - _- - - •- -- ' - ' - ' - -5 LF I4,
I.
X n Chapel Boulevard C Boulevard to Brentwood $61 3
Mobility,
-east side Circle.
$61,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
- 11. - . I North side from sidewalk ) •
East Dove Road- terminus west of Lonesome 4080 LF Mobility, 3.1&
491 north side Dove(1497 East Dove Road) ROW,drainage,trees,utility relocation. $360,000 3 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
P
j to North Kimball Avenue.
South side from the Carroll
492 East Highland Middle School driveway to ROW,drainage,trees. 1220 LF ' 3 Mobility, • i 3.1&
Street-south side $163,000 1 Infrastructure,C2 3.3
,` , 2149 East Highland Street. _ I 1 i
*Segment identified for potential inclusion in a planned CIP project in the vicinity if funding and site conditions allow.
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
TXDOT Segments*
Primary Length& Strategic Link
ID Street/Location Description Issues/Comments Estimated Cost VGO
Ir West Southlake South side at the 2500 block Requires engineering design due-to-drainage • i - ._
141 Boulevard-south of West Southlake Boulevard pattern. The driveway for the church will need to be $631 450 0L Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 1 33,3 !
I $63,000
t side ,-(The Hills Church of Christ), redone, i i II
- li II South side of East Southlake -� - Li
East Southlake Boulevard,west of Central130 LF301 Boulevard-south Avenue;connecting existing Steep grade change. $10,000Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
, side sidewalk to crosswalk at 1
[ jf , Central Avenue, i _� �_
_-.-____ ._ -._...„.. ` "South side from__ . East- - - _ - _. __ . _ , _ -- -- -
East Southiake Southlake Boulevard to 2905 290 LF 3.1&
488 Boulevard-south Grading;utilities. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
side East Southlake Boulevard $23,000 3,3
- v ClulkTrip),
Ordinance No. 1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 90
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
I TXDOT Segments*
Primary Length& Strategic Link
ID Street/Location Description Issues/Comments Estimated Cost VGO
North side between 200 East ' ,i - I
East Southlake Is Southlake Boulevard and 140 I' i,, 180 LF 3', 3.1&
489 :i Boulevard-north - ;' Grading;utilities. , Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
i� side ,, East Southlake Boulevard I, . $17,000 I 3.3
(CVS Pharmacy). , _ _
*To be completed by TXDOT as part of TXDOT's F.M. 1709 Pedestrian Improvements Project. —
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority. List)
Neighborhood Sidewalk Segments*
Primary Length& Strategic Link
ID Street/Location Description Issues/Comments Estimated Cost VGO
Royal Lane-east .. East side of intersection of !, Steep grade, ;, 41 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 i 3.1&
0 side , Johnson Road +' i $5,000 , 3.3 `
-.-- ------- ---- , West side from Continental i� - - --- - - ----- -- -- - - - -- --- I -
i. Village Green Drive : ROW/Easement;would need to take down an HOA , 91 LF ' 3,1&
2 Boulevard to Amesbury +' Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
;+-west side 11 entry wall, i. $14,000 3.3
--- '_Court_ --- - -- -- —'l- - - - — - -
j' Deer Hollow West side from West i'
Continental Boulevard north is I; 96 LF ;'' 3.1&
6 i; Boulevard-west to parking lot on Southlake i; ROW/Easement. ,. $8,000 I' Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 , 3.3
I side i' Woods HOA lot. _ _ ____ ____
+ i, Morningside Drive I, West side from Merlot Drive I. 930 LF . 3.1&
18 ;; i+ ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
f_-west side to Rainbow Street, !^ $111 000 IE 3.3
----- ------ - --- --------
' Fontaine - - - --- - - - _ `
Drive/Lorraine From Merlot Drive to South d , 797 LF 3.1&
19 I; �' ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
• Drive/Versailles Carroll Avenue, $90,000 3.3
Drive _ t '
North side from Byron yl
i, Nettleton Drive- 585 LF i 3.1& +
20 north side NNelseon Parkway to Inwood .; HOA landscaping. $75,000 I Mobility, Infrastructure,C2 ` 3.3
Warwick Way- ' South side from Montgomery ,, i' 150 LF j 3,1&
, ROW/Easement, I' ; Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 4; 3.3 i
Louth side I; Lane to Brumlow Avenue. --_ , $11,000 ;,
Ordinance No.1075.-C,Adopted,December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 91
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
Neighborhood Sidewalk Segments*
ID Primary Description Issues/Comments Length& Strategic Link VGO
Street/Location Estimated Cost
- -- .._-.___- West side from existing __ �� -- -_a____. _ .._ __ _
Foxbotough Lane- sidewalk along Gateshead 435 LE 3.1&
23 ROW/Easement, $27,000 Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.3
west side Court to East Southlake
Boulevard.
Southcrest Court- I North side from Southbend _ 385 LF 3.1& I
26 north side i Trail to North Carroll Avenue. ROW/Easement;retaining walls and large trees. _$24,000 Moblllty,Infrastructure,C2 3,3
I Southcrest Court- South sld'e from Southbend ! ROW/Easement;retaining walls and Rlarge trees.T 11 39u LF F Mobility,infrastructure,C2 1 3.1&
?� south side Trail to North Caroll Avenue. � $28,0001 3.3
I North side from North White
Ascot Drive-north -_ .- - . _ _ -_ T-_-__ - . 727 LF 3.1&
56 Chapel Boulevard to Saratoga Moblllty,Infrastructure,C2
side Drive. i $92,000 i 3.3 $
° { I
r East Chapel Downs North side from North White 1651 LF m 3.1&
-
57 Chapel Boulevard to end of ROW/Easement. [ Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
Drive-north side street, $172,000 3.3
L
.._ - - North side from South _ ,m- _ _ _ _-
Stonebury Court- Peytonvllle Avenue to I 175 LF 3.1&
61 Potential retaining wall. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
north side existing sidewalk along Indian $22,000 3,3
Paintbrush Way.
West orrtexisting '.- _ __ .-,._ ___ ____._ -___ _____ ____ _ -
ide
65 Meadowlark Lane- sidewalk along Meadowlark ROW/Easement. 78 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1&
west side Lane to West Southlake i $13,000 3,3
Boulevard.
I
66 Jordan Drive and 'l From North Pearson Lane to 1 1796 LF 1 3,1&I
I I ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
ttt 1 Harrell Drive Johnson Road, $135,000 3.3
II
-
' From North Pearson Lane to 879 LF - -. - - ! - - - - - - 3,1&
67 �, Gray Lane ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2
II Harrell Drive. �1 $74,000 � 3,3
If I Easement required. This is an existing nature trail 11 [
Connector from 11 Across Stone Lakes property 1 within Stone Lakes HOA property. Accessibility f I
1 Stone Lakes to I from existing sidewalk along during construction would be difficult. Existing trail { 533 LF 3.1&
72 1 Monticello Stratford Drive to existing is narrow and would need to clear area for $2g7,000 Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 I 3,3
Estates/Timber trail on Monticello Estates construction. Trail would require stairs with
-. _Lake. HOA property. pedestrian rail to reach Stratford Drive. Monticello _ , ._ _, _ _ -
is a gated communit .
- -- 10
( From Royal&Annie Smith
74 1 Vermilion Court Park to West Southlake ROW/Easement. 88 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1&
1 $106,000 3,3
Boulevard,
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 92
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List)
Neighborhood Sidewalk Segments*
Primary Length& Strategic Link
ID Description Issues/Comments VGO
Street/Location Estimated Cost
From Gallant Court(Trallhead ' Easement required. Located within trailh ead HOA—
131
Place connection $7 Trallhead/Johnson Addition)to Johnson Place property. Within Flood Hazard Area Zone X;would $7
Park. require culvert with headwall. 7,000 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1&
3,3
*See Neighborhood Sidewalk Matching Funds Program.
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 93
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
(I)
■?'asliir, :%uu�, 15**
? FIT•71,:i411;_,Eri Elin2 0 3 5
-F"91:1 �IIIIIIIF'.� 117EL .
.111�- L 11° o
'Faun ��^�oD�'� ■
rlrlll,r1,11t11n L ' Official
..111 :arlml I
3..:.```'_ 011ftilttaZriVe Pathways Map
-' �'` r��ii,.,1_1€ 15;;�ki; ..=E Yhoe Ordinance No.1075C
• j j\ .;�`ie ��''"'�1101 Adopted by the Southlake City
ui iin1 I .r■,
t�9Ij►■���IIII°� Y s' Council on December 7,2021
uri-Iuuui' x '
auk 0
` ME4 it a: T W 11 �111111111n111
". .UIfIln, luau 1;1 I°Ilill ' I�Iliin r 7 Legend
�i . 1■ ma V, lr-e' 14 o I<...` ■ llllll t mprI ll5 ij
i►�■a J�■'■` Tiiii'��� t �' I.ru■�-\ muii ,■ \1'�I i■� �.1 Tier 1 Priority Segments*(2021)
kt■ 1■■Ir1 nuunuq 4� `1R . i - wuur at.t.j .� . .
■1 a■ ■■ua ar. i�. 1 IDIt�� eITier2PrioritySegments•(2021)
� 11n■r-■mi ai5 it,1„' 1 1 1 \ \I/r I`4,;711 r'
n,��1•■I El 1►l�i�■� �I',�'�t'I I �� ��m ,�a) ire Tier Priori Segments*2021
711 r I t ..11 1 \s r 11 1r� ,,�, Priority D ( )
■■G�1 10 f:41 NN du■ i viiwni*P11 v■ - .
{ �i 1■r .rr 1�a NeighborhoodSegments(2021)
hJ5 r-1 1, n ■I,.■u ■
1.0I11111�u i11.0.4 E.:,e(1i ul"I111:—I` I ,r��i`'�' 111 n ( 1
-(" e�TxDOTSegme is 2021
atullllllllll� 1vi :. ; ►. � nR IN Public Parks
r ti b►. tr . ' • 'i �1`T0 � ► � �r S
� - V�1/I17� 1 li ■in■i o d ,
�il iir 41" 1j1 1.. ■ kr, ,1L SI rr 7 p.i
,.-.II` 11 1...., un AlR-1 Hi-AIM ovi♦1i'• �L' ''��� �i
Rill
v xu■■ uns�•• ■1 rr_[r
Iuu■In I I o � un1�1/i .1t 1�Pr��1� r�,lalrr �
j ! 1 �:Y/�� n..nm 1111� .. u.I��1►ry,,�� "11 L r
1.r Miq a 1 ,1 1il 1 ; - 10 R ..r�'I .girl y o a�lti
IIIIII ■nu J n' J 1 IP■■ Imc 1 1 711 t ■ 1 r Z
,-.1' Illlllllll li i
iiejermap
ir
1 E �:: gym _ ■ �eil ., � i �L �_�■1 - S r II-ZiI 11,1 '`fo'3'1■�
I.■ 1 a ■r " 1 , 11 p. ..,`` by ( x II 1 ,I t `T{�IIi'1 {Ir
;;.l�I �I r IA 7; Il° i 1111111 s C min i ■f II : i u6CIAMER
'-- 1�11��1��+i�5�J `� \ i�- _.��� I { „ 1.,. of i■\ rmm.w been...4..m.cry
r L Y f f ■ �I 1 \ I 1 �1 l� �1. 1 1 n! ■l■1 asotes Ian.ea..0 l
ipliV
'1 t ��'1 t� °�4 ,, 1 n11 r �1 t` l'_ i Ii `I I II�� ,��I� ti "°.`: wo�
L: -sari•: i 1-.- TI Wu1Jiu1 1g1m un 1 I in -v-IF Mr r'I I�n7—agi 1,...::.%.“:1,,":7::...,,,,,,:f',..::::::d::1,;f:,.
a �ln..r�u�..a-\I _ 1 �• r I•I • I �R•r11.Mif I� I1+•; r`�ip -',i��� - ! � 1 a 11 � -1 711• =_1�III0 slGtlie Ma.k �`� - 1 I7 .nam•m11e.n� - iv, Ii,1 � r ry ',, ■ . •'177� gal.mn.a
♦�I , hp n emvegtlPetltle
- -- -- ---- -- --- — - �. ..■. yi 'l^` .. %_ Scale_1:54000
\.40- != ` lastBasema Revsion:l211/2D21
1 _ 1 inch=4500 ft a
'' Planning and Development Services
OPXIGeographic Information Systems
Ordinance No. 1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 94
[SOUTH LAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Active Transportation and Crosswalk Policy Recommendations
Priority Department.
Recommendation Strategic Link VGo:
Tier Responsible
i Continue education outreach efforts to Improve safety for I 11 Safety&Security,Mobility; 111 1
AT2 1 I DPS, PDS, PW Cl,C2 3.1, 5.8 I
motorists, pedestrians,and bicyclists. I g
l ,,
— i! Continue to conduct pedestrian safety walk-throughs in Town j }1 Safety&Security;Mobility; 1I
AT3 1 PW, PDS, ED i� II 3.1
Square prior to any festival or special events in Town Square. C1,C2
1 II
' On an annual basis, review the sidewalk priority list and prioritize i i;
AT4 1 PDS, PW 1 Mobility,Infrastructure;C2 l 3.1
sidewalk construction.
• _ _
1 , (; Mobility,Infrastructure,
AT5 ;1 identify bicycle routes that may require additional signs. 2 PW, PDS ; Performance Management& I; 3,1
;' Service Delivery;C2,B5, B6 �'
'I Explore options for encouraging bike rack Installation at local li Mobility,Partnerships& 111
'
AT6 li businesses. 2.. PDS, ED .! Volunteerism;C2,C5,B2 ,I 9.1,9.3
AT7 I. Conduct bicycle and pedestrian counts. Consider utilizing Strava 2 PW, PDS 1; Mobility;C2 11 3.1
i Metro for tracking biking,walking, hiking, and running trips. i! — _ � _ — _ _ i
III Consider the addition of a grant writer/sidewalk coordinator lII
position for grant writing, coordinating sidewalk and trail II Mobility;Performance 1{
AT8 i; construction between departments and between public and private i, 2 ', TBD Management&Service , 3,1,5.8
;i development projects,and managing bicycle/pedestrian ' = - l; Delivery;C1,C6
'' educational outreach. I'. I ;,
I {
AT9 I Consider elevated pedestrian crossings at all 4 corners of the t 3 ; PW, PDS I' Mobility;Cl,C2 1.2, 3.1,3,2
ii intersection of Carroll Avenue and Southlake Boulevard. I 1
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 95
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
■ Priority Department
Recommendation Strategic Link - -
Tier Responsible
Safety&Security,Mobility,
Infrastructure,
AT10 Continue a regular maintenance schedule for crosswalks,specifying 1 PW, PDS Performance Management 3,1
more frequent maintenance of crosswalks near schools. &Service Delivery;C1, C2,
B5, B6
Implement the recommended crosswalk types(Table P-1 in
AT11i-
Mobility Master Plan pg.56)whenever new crosswalks are Installed 1 PW Safety&Security, Mobility, 31
or existing crosswalks are re striped. Infrastructure;C1,C2
AT14 Continue participating in the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory 1 PDS,CS, PW Partnerships& 91
Committee through the NCTCOG. Volunteerism,C5
i As the City designs,constructs or provides maintenance on City I
roads,consider opportunities to Incorporate bicycle signage in a Quality Development,
AT15 1 PW Mobility, infrastructure; 1.2,3.7
manner that provides linkages to bicycle facilities In neighboring C2,C3
cities.
Mobility,Safety&Security,
AT16 Consider citywide participation in Bike(Safety) Month (May). 1 PDS,CS, ED, DPS partnerships& 3.7,5.8,9.1
Volunteerism;Cl,C3,C5,
1 C6,
11 Mobility,Safety&Security,
AT17 Host a Bicycle Safety Forum. 1 PDS, PW, DPS Partnerships& 3,7,5.8,9.1
Volunteerism;C1,C5,C6,
I—__] - B2
- - - - Mobility, Partnerships&
Upon bike slgnage Implementation Maps.
,develop bicycle-related Story Volunteerism,
AT18 1 PDS, PW, ED Performance Management 3.7,9,3
&Service Delivery;C2, B2,
L B6
Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 96
[SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan
Mobility,Safety&Security, . ,
AT19 !; Pursue grant funding opportunities for projects related to bicycle 1 PDS, DPS, PW Ii Performance Management 3.7,5.8
safety. i &Service Delivery;Cl, B4, i'
! i F1
Once Brumlow Avenue is widened, promote the linkage from ; j Mobility,Safety&Security,
AT21 11 Southlake to the Cotton Belt Trail. Include the linkage along Kimball 3 PDS, PW ' Performance Management 3.4
Avenue.
It &Service Delivery;C2, C3, Ii
B6
i
I. Quality Development, 11
I, Consider designing, installing and/or constructing any future bike
3 PW Mobility, Infrastructure; , 1.2, 3.7, 10.6
ATZZ i
si facilities according to AASHTO/NACTO guidelines, i C1, 81, F2
!; Quality Development, 1
Explore opportunities to Implement new technology and Mobility, Infrastructure,
AT23 Improvements that promote bicycle and pedestrian safety. ! 1 i PW, PDS 1.2, 3,2, 10.6
Safety&Security;C1,C2,
i
B6, F2
I'
ai Research and consider pursuing Bicycle Friendly Community status lI '
AT24 3 PDS, CS i i
. Quality Development; B1 l' 1.2
I: through the League of American Bicyclists. I, I
, i
- -- — -- — --— _ - _ - - -- - - - ------- - -_J
{ — II to
11
' Mobility,Safety&Security, `,
�' In coordination with local schools, update the City's Safe Routes to 3.1,3.2,3,3,3,6,
AT26 1 ! 1 , PDS Partnerships&
' Schools Plan.
, , Volunteerism; Cl,C2,C5 ; 3.8 9.2
Ordinance No.1075'-C,Adopted December 7,2021 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 97