Item 10Case No.
ZA21-0099
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 3, 2022
CASE NO: ZA21-0099
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for The Conservation
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of WillowTree Custom Homes, DeOtte Inc. is requesting approval of a
Preliminary Plat for The Conservation on property described as Lot 10, Block 2,
Harbor Oaks, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and
Tract 5, Rees D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, Southlake, Texas and
addressed as 2970 Burney Ln. and 3185 Southlake Park Dr., Southlake, Texas.
Current Zoning: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN
Neighborhood #2.
DETAILS: The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Preliminary Plat that
conforms to the Zoning Change and Development Plan for The Conservation
(ZA20-0049) that was approved by City Council on December 1, 2020, which
includes 8 residential lots on approximately 13.1 acres. Access to the lots will be
provided through a 40’ wide access easement with a 25’ wide curbed concrete
street that will transition from a non-curbed segment at the entrance of the
development approximately 50’ west of Burney Lane, across the existing platted
lot in Harbor Oaks (Lot 10, Block 2). The access easement and street are
proposed to be non-gated, open to public traffic, but privately maintained by the
owner’s association.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Preliminary Plat
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Revised Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated January 3, 2022
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Presentation
Plans
2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report
SPIN Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0099 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: WillowTree Custom Homes
APPLICANT: DeOtte, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: 2970 Burney Lane and 3185 Southlake Park Dr.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10, Block 2, Harbor Oaks Subdivision, and Tract 5, Rees D. Price
Survey, Abstract No. 1207
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential and 100-Year Floodplain
CURRENT ZONING: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District
HISTORY: Lot 10, Block 2 is a platted lot within the Harbor Oaks Subdivision. There
are 49 total lots within the Harbor Oaks subdivision. There was no
development history on Tract 5, Rees D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207
prior to the approval of the Zoning Change and Development Plan for The
Conservation.
- A zoning change from “AG” to “PUD” (ZA74-004) for the Harbor Oaks
properties was approved in 1974.
- A zoning change from “PUD” to “A-3” and a revised plat for Harbor
Oaks (ZA79-049) were approved September 24, 1980.
- The SF-1 Single Family District zoning was placed on the Harbor
Oaks properties with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and
the Official Zoning Map in 1986.
- The SF-1A Single Family Residential District zoning was placed on
the Harbor Oaks properties with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No.
480 and the Official Zoning Map in 1989.
- A Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA20-0049) for The
Conservation was approved December 1, 2020.
SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation for the site is Low Density
Residential with a portion of Tract 5 in the R.D. Price survey (3185
Southlake Park Dr.) designated as Floodplain.
Purpose: The purpose of the Low Density Residential land use category
is to provide for and to protect low intensity detached single-family
residential development that promotes the openness and rural character
of Southlake.
Definition (this definition was updated by passage of Ordinance No. 1186
on February 20, 2018): The Low Density Residential category is for
detached single-family residential development at a net density of one or
fewer dwelling units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units
per net acre, which excludes acreage in all rights-of-way, easement, and
lots designated for public or private streets. Other suitable activities are
those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi-
Public categories. The Low Density Residential category encourages the
openness and rural character of the City of Southlake.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0099 Page 2
Purpose and Definition: The Floodplain category illustrates areas
designated by the August 1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) maps as being in the 100-year floodplain. The “floodplain” is an
expanse of natural vegetation and wildlife, and should be preserved as
natural open area. Within the floodplain is “floodway” that must be kept
free of encroachment in order that the 100-year flood may be carried
without harmful increases in the height of flood waters. Although it is not
to be encouraged, the portion of the floodplain not in the floodway may
be reclaimed for development under certain circumstances if in
accordance with FEMA regulations. The designated land use for areas of
reclaimed floodplain is that of the immediately adjacent land use category.
This designation may also include environmentally sensitive areas,
habitats, or wetlands that may not be in FEMA identified floodplains.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The development was approved with no internal sidewalks and no
sidewalk along Burney Lane. The approved Development Plan shows a
6’ trail from the access easement to the property owned by the United
States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), which will provide access to
the existing and future equestrian/hike trails to the north and west of the
proposed development on the property owned by the USACE.
An Open Space and Wildlife Easement and a Landscape, Mail, Public
Pedestrian and Equestrian Access easement are to be separate. This
gives the public access to the adjacent USACE property.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
Access to the lots will be provided through a 40’ wide access easement
with a 25’ wide curbed concrete street that will transition from a non-
curbed segment at the entrance of the development approximately 50’
west of Burney Lane, across the existing platted lot in Harbor Oaks (Lot
10, Block 2). The access easement and street are proposed to be non-
gated, open to public traffic, but privately maintained by the owner’s
association.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis was not required for this development.
TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Conservation Analysis that was approved with the Zoning
Change and Development Plan for The Conservation (ZA20-0049) shows
that there is a total of 91% of existing tree cover of which 50.41% will be
preserved, 31.91% is proposed as “Marginal”, and 17.68% is to be
removed. The Tree Conservation Plan for the development must comply
with the approved Tree Conservation Analysis.
UTILITIES: An 8-inch water line exists along the east side of Burney Lane.
City sewer is not available to the property. An on-site sewage facility, or
septic system, will be required.
DRAINAGE: Existing Conditions: The existing site is densely vegetated. The
drainage flow in existing conditions flows in the northwesterly direction
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0099 Page 3
toward Grapevine Lake. A portion of the proposed Lot 2 is located within
the flood plain. The property is also encumbered by a flowage easement
along the western boundary. The flowage easement, defined by the 572-
foot contour, prevents the construction of inhabited structures, the
placement of fill material and/or placing or constructing structures without
prior authorization.
Proposed Conditions: The proposed conditions will include a paved
roadway and seven graded pad sites. Storm runoff will be captured in a
serious of private onsite curb inlets, storm drain pipe and culverts. Two
curb inlets will capture the runoff from the roadway and will connect to a
24-inch culvert that outlets into the existing earthen channel. Two
culverts are proposed that allow drainage flow to follow the existing path
from the east to the west of the proposed roadway. The culverts will outlet
into the existing earthen channels and eventually outlet into Grapevine
Lake. The proposed lots will mostly follow the existing drainage pattern
flowing to the west, with some runoff being captured in the proposed curb
inlets and the remainder following the natural course offsite.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held for this project on September 22, 2020. Please
see the meeting report attached separately.
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on August 31,
2020. Please see the meeting report attached separately.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated January 3, 2022.
The City Council motion for approval of the Zoning Change and Concept
Plan for The Conservation (ZA20-0049) is included below for reference:
December 1, 2020; Approved at 2nd Reading (7-0) subject to staff report
dated November 23, 2020 and Site Plan Summary No. 5, dated
November 23, 2020, noting that this approval is for 8 residential lots on
approximately 13.1 acres, noting also the access easement/street is to
be non-gated, open to public traffic, but privately maintained by the
homeowner’s association, approving Development Plan Option B, which
shows the access easement/street access from Burney Lane on the north
side of Lot 10, Block 2 of Harbor Oaks, noting a PUD regulation is added
to allow the length of the cul-de-sac to exceed of 1,000 ft. Also noting that
at a minimum, the cross section of first 50’ of the neighborhood access
easement/street from the Burney Lane intersection will be designed as a
typical rural road cross-section with a bar ditch, meaning no street curbs
or gutters as referenced on the development plan. As the road proceeds
west, the road cross section will transition back into a typical urban street
cross section with curb and gutter. Also noting that no street lights will be
installed as part of the construction of the neighborhood, also noting that
all homes with be equipped with a fire suppression “sprinkler” system ,
also noting the approved plat will indicate a public pedestrian/equestrian
access easement along the neighborhood street as well as along the 6‘
trail located on Lot 2 that leads into the Army Corps of Engineer property.
Noting there will be no living tree removal, construction, or fencing
allowed in the identified open space and wildlife easement, noting
approval of all the modifications, plans and exhibits contained in the staff
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0099 Page 4
report dated November 23, 2020. Noting that if, in the construction of the
road, grading or drainage associated with the access easement, any
damage occurs to trees on the adjacent Lot 9, Block 2 of Harbor Oaks
leading to the death of those trees, such trees will be replaced, inch for
inch, with Red, Bur or Live Oak trees. Also noting that the fencing along
Burney Lane on Lot 10, Block 2 will be replaced with wrought iron but no
masonry columns, also noting that fencing shall be provided as shown on
the submitted wall and fence diagram for Lots 1 – 7, and that additional
side, rear and front yard fencing is permitted but limiting that fencing to
wrought iron or pipe rail. Also noting that there will be no storage of
construction equipment or parking of vehicles during construction within
100 feet of Burney Lane. Also noting that approval is conditioned on final
approval from the Army Corps of Engineers regarding the roadway
crossing over the flowage easement, which the applicant shall provide to
our Planning & Development Services department. Also noting that no
disturbance on the property shall be permitted or undertaken on the
property, until such approval is provided to our Planning & Development
Services department, noting the applicant’s agreement to that condition.
Also noting per the applicant’s agreement that we will be moving the new
road through the Housmans property (Lot 10, Block 2) to the south by 40’
from as indicated on the staff report with an easement provided with no
construction or structures between the Brown property and the new road.
Also noting that the applicant will work with City staff on an administrative
approval of screening to account for headlights in the direction of Ms. Van
Sant’s property. Also noting the relocation of the curb stop for the kiosk
and mailboxes which will be moved to the new access road from Burney
Lane on Lot 10, Block 2, and this will be an exception to the easement
provided above.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA21-0099 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0099 Page 1
REVISED PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA21-0099 Review No.: One Date of Review: 01/03/22
Project Name: Preliminary Plat – The Conservation
APPLICANT: Andrew Wilson OWNER: Jody Alumbaugh
DeOtte, Inc. WillowTree Custom Homes
420 Johnson Rd. Suite 303 680 N. Carroll Ave.
Keller, TX 76248 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 253-5727 Phone:
E-mail: claytonredinger@deotte.com E-mail:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
12/09/21 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. Per Subdivision Ordinance No 483, as amended, Section 4.01.C, the Preliminary Plat must
comply with the underlying zoning.
2. Per Subdivision Ordinance No 483, as amended, Section 2.01, a Preliminary Plat must be
processed and approved and then a Final Plat must be processed, approved and recorded prior
to the conveyance of any lots or the issuance of any building permits. The Final Plat must be
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the execution of a developer’s
agreement and commencement of any site work.
3. The access easement shown on the development plan from Burney Lane across Lot 10, Block
2 in the Harbor Oaks Subdivision must be executed and filed of record before the plat can be
filed on the other lots in The Conservation subdivision (shown on the development plan as lots
1 – 7).
4. Approval is conditioned on final approval from the Army Corps of Engineers regarding the
roadway crossing over the flowage easement, which the applicant shall provide to our Planning
& Development Services department. Also noting that no disturbance on the property shall be
permitted or undertaken on the property, until such approval is provided to our P lanning &
Development Services department.
The following are required in accordance with Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483, as amended:
5. The Preliminary Plat must conform to the approved Concept Plan for The Conservation (ZA20 -
0049). Please make the following changes:
a. Show and label all easements as approved with the Zoning Change and Development
Plan including a public pedestrian/equestrian access easement along the neighborhood
street as well as along the 6‘ trail located on Lot 2 on the Development Plan that leads
into the Army Corps of Engineer property, an open space and wildlife easement, an
easement with no construction or structures between the property at 2984 Burney and
the new road, a Landscape, Mail, Public Pedestrian and Equestrian Access easement,
an appropriate easement for the road and any other required easements.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0099 Page 2
b. Label the lots as they are labeled on the Development Plan.
c. Add a note to the subsequent Final Plat stating that the easements above are to be
maintained by the HOA.
6. Remove the approval blocks from the face of the plat.
7. Delete the owner’s dedication and notary from the face of the plat.
8. Place the City case number ZA21-0099" in the lower right-hand corner of the plat.
9. Provide a quantitative land use schedule in accordance with the following format:
Quantitative Land Use Schedule
Phase
Existing
Land
Use
Existing
Zoning
Propose
d Zoning
Number
of Units
Gross
Acreage
Density-DU
/Gross
Acreage
Open
Space
Area / %
10. Label existing zoning and Land Use Designation (LUD = ) on all adjacent properties.
11. Please label the existing zoning (“R-PUD”) on the subject property.
* City sewer is not available, so on-site sewage systems must be utilized. Permits from the
Tarrant County Public Health Department are required.
* The following variances to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, were approved with
the approval of the Zoning Change and Concept Plan for The Conservation (ZA20-0049).
a. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.06 Sidewalks - requires that any new
development provide for the location and construction of sidewalks. The applicant has
written in a development regulation to not provide any sidewalks.
b. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01 Lotting Requirements - states that “Every
lot shall abut on a public street or a private street.” Additionally, Section 5.04 requires
new subdivisions to have “public streets”. The minimum public street standard requires
a 50’ wide right-of-way with a 31’ wide curb and gutter street. The regulations propose
an entry curb transition area from no curb and gutter at the entrance of the subdivision
to a 25’ B-B pavement section with standard 6” curb, in a 40’ Access Easement shall be
provided along the frontage of the residential lots. The cul-de-sac shall have a 100’ B-B
outside diameter of paving, in a one hundred ten (110’) foot diameter easement (non-
gated, open to the public and maintained by the owner’s association).
c. The applicant has written in a development regulation to allow for the length of the cul-
de-sac to exceed 1,000 feet (Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Article V, Section 5.03)
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0099 Page 3
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Provide a complete Tree Conservation Plan which conforms to the approved Tree Conservation
Analysis. Provide the existing tree cover preservation calculations, all protected trees, marginal
trees, and trees to be removed. The approved Tree Conservation Analysis shows that there is
a total of 91% of existing tree cover of which 50.41% will be preserved, 31.91% is proposed as
“Marginal”, and 17.68% is to be removed.
2. On the Tree Conservation Plan, show the existing trees which will need to be removed for the
construction of the Lake Grapevine Compensatory Storage Area on Lot 2. Since no grading
and/or tree removal are proposed on the lots during the development of the subdivision, a
construction path will be required to be shown on the Civil Construction Plans and all existing
trees not shown to be removed on the approved Tree Conservation Plan will be required to
protected.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing
tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum
existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning
Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council
regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council
finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0099 Page 4
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easemen ts so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandy Endy, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. No construction permits will be issued until the City has received the written approval from the
Army Corps of Engineers stating that the proposed design is acceptable.
PRELIMINARY PLAT COMMENTS:
2. Label all proposed easements (utility, access, pedestrian/equestrian access, etc.) Please be
aware that the minimum utility easement width is 10’.
GRADING PLAN
3. Provide a matchline for the separate plan view window for Lot 2.
4. Show and label the flowage easement and floodplain linework.
EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP
5. The flow value listed in plan view for sub-area XA1 doesn’t match the calculation table.
6. Add the discharge point pentagon symbol to the Legend.
7. The Infiltration values do not appear to follow the most current version of the iSWM manual,
updated April 2020. Please update the Infiltration values to reflect the latest iSWM values.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. If detention is not being proposed for the
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0099 Page 5
increase in runoff, then documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary
will be required prior to approval of construction plans. Memorandum shall be signed and sealed
by a registered PE.
PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP
8. Flow and/or area values listed in plan view for sub-areas A1 and OS-A2 do not match what is
listed in the calculation table.
9. The total areas for existing conditions doesn’t match what is shown for proposed conditions.
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS, STORM PROFILES AND PAVING PLAN
10. These sheets were reviewed for informational purposes at this time, and may have additional
comments once submitted with the civil construction permit plans.
* Please verify that the total flows listed for each pipe segment is correct.
* Please update the calculations with the correct infiltration values.
* Please ensure that the vertical and horizontal curves comply with the proposed design speed
requirements.
WATER PLAN
11. Please be aware that the minimum radius for an 8” pipe is 200’. Please revise the water pipe
layout accordingly and ensure that all pipe is located within the proposed easement.
12. Please be aware that all water meters shall be located within a dedicated easement or right -of-
way.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist through
the online Customer Self Service Portal for review: CSS (cityofsouthlake.com). Please allow
15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most rec ent construction plan
checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall
be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
* NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
* Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared
by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a pe rmit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A Developer Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved by
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0099 Page 6
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement
on the City Council agenda for consideration.
*=Denotes informational comment that don’t need to be addressed until Civil Construction Submittals.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 600 feet for subdivisions where all homes are
completely protected by a fire suppression system. (Add and/or relocate hydrants as necessary
to meet the requirements)
Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as
prescribed above, measured as the hose would be laid. (Also, add a fire hydrant at the entrance
to the subdivision off of Burney Lane)
The 24 foot wide street was approved by the Fire Chief due to every home in the subdivision
being protected with an automatic fire suppression system.
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The
Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication
requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and
impact fees.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fee s Guide to determine
the fee amount.
* The City Council motion for approval of the Zoning Change and Development Plan for The
Conservation (ZA20-0049) is included below:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0099 Page 7
December 1, 2020; Approved at 2nd Reading (7-0) subject to staff report dated November 23,
2020 and Site Plan Summary No. 5, dated November 23, 2020, noting that this approval is for
8 residential lots on approximately 13.1 acres, noting also the access easement/street is to be
non-gated, open to public traffic, but privately maintained by the homeowner’s association ,
approving Development Plan Option B, which shows the access easement/street access from
Burney Lane on the north side of Lot 10, Block 2 of Harbor Oaks, noting a PUD regulation is
added to allow the length of the cul-de-sac to exceed of 1,000 ft. Also noting that at a minimum,
the cross section of first 50’ of the neighborhood access easement/street from the Burney Lane
intersection will be designed as a typical rural road cro ss-section with a bar ditch, meaning no
street curbs or gutters as referenced on the development plan. As the road proceeds west, the
road cross section will transition back into a typical urban street cross section with curb and
gutter. Also noting that no street lights will be installed as part of the construction of the
neighborhood, also noting that all homes with be equipped with a fire suppression “sprinkler”
system, also noting the approved plat will indicate a public pedestrian/equestrian access
easement along the neighborhood street as well as along the 6‘ trail located on Lot 2 that leads
into the Army Corps of Engineer property. Noting there will be no living tree removal,
construction, or fencing allowed in the identified open space and wildlife easement, noting
approval of all the modifications, plans and exhibits contained in the staff report dated November
23, 2020. Noting that if, in the construction of the road, grading or drainage associated with the
access easement, any damage occurs to trees on the adjacent Lot 9, Block 2 of Harbor Oaks
leading to the death of those trees, such trees will be replaced, inch for inch, with Red, Bur or
Live Oak trees. Also noting that the fencing along Burney Lane on Lot 10, Block 2 will be
replaced with wrought iron but no masonry columns, also noting that fencing shall be provided
as shown on the submitted wall and fence diagram for Lots 1 – 7, and that additional side, rear
and front yard fencing is permitted but limiting that fencing to wrought iron or pipe rail. Also
noting that there will be no storage of construction equipment or parking of vehicles during
construction within 100 feet of Burney Lane. Also noting that approval is conditioned on final
approval from the Army Corps of Engineers regarding the roadway crossing over the flowage
easement, which the applicant shall provide to our Planning & Development Services
department. Also noting that no disturbance on the property shall be permitted or undertaken on
the property, until such approval is provided to our Planning & Development Services
department, noting the applicant’s agreement to that condition. Also noting per the applicant’s
agreement that we will be moving the new road through the Housmans property (Lot 10, Block
2) to the south by 40’ from as indicated on the staff report with an easement provided with no
construction or structures between the Brown property and the new road. Also noting that the
applicant will work with City staff on an administrative approval of screening to account for
headlights in the direction of Ms. Van Sant’s property. Also noting the relocation of the curb stop
for the kiosk and mailboxes which will be moved to the new access road from Burney Lane on
Lot 10, Block 2, and this will be an exception to the easement provided above.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0099 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. OCONNOR, MARY E SF1-A 2965 BURNEY LN 5.93 NR
2. CURRENT OWNER SF1-A 1060 HARBOR HAVEN 3.03 NR
3. GEORGE, DAVID SF1-A 2980 BURNEY LN 1.05 NR
4. MOLLY GEORGE BROWN TRUST SF1-A 2984 BURNEY LN 1.35 NR
5. DOTTIE AND DIXIE INVESTMENTS L RPUD 2970 BURNEY LN 2.00 NR
6. FREDRICKS, JACK SF1-A 2960 BURNEY LN 2.17 NR
7. WINN, DARIN SF1-A 2950 BURNEY LN 2.14 O
8. JOHNSON, GRAHAM SF1-A 2940 BURNEY LN 2.28 O
9. WILSON THELMA B SURVIVOR'S TRU SF1-A 2930 BURNEY LN 2.19 NR
10. STEWART, JOHN D SF1-A 2920 BURNEY LN 2.01 NR
11. GALANTI, LIVIO RPUD 3000 BURNEY LN 3.09 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0099 Page 2
12. CURTIS, MARY KATHRYN SF1-A 3580 BURNEY LN 1.07 NR
13. MOLLY GEORGE BROWN TRUST SF1-A 0 BURNEY LN 0.15 NR
14. BRAYTON, LARRY SF1-A 3020 BURNEY LN 2.20 NR
15. U S A AG 3195 SOUTHLAKE PARK DR 107.03 NR
16. MILES, MARYLYN E RPUD 3185 SOUTHLAKE PARK DR 11.85 NR
17. ADAMS, BILL M SF1-A 880 HARBOR CT 3.48 NR
18. U S A AG 3175 SOUTHLAKE PARK DR 17.44 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Eighteen (18)
Responses Received within 200’: Two (2) - attached
Response with no address: One (1) - attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0099 Page 3
Responses received within 200’
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0099 Page 4
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0099 Page 5
Response received with no address