The URL can be used to link to this page

1997-05-20 CC Packet CISD to look into land V el purchase for athletic complex e- -13 Progress Report Judy Gilmore. CI School Board President At their April 21 Buddy Luce said, "the time is meeting the Carroll ISD Board coming when no tracts of land of Trustees gave the finance the size we think we will need committee the go ahead to try will be available, at any price, and find any existing money to we need to move on this soon." purchase land for a future Board member Robert athletic complex. The Board Flaherty questioned whether it also approved using staff time was really necessary to move so in the endeavor. quickly on the land without any Board member Doug public input. Mr. Luce Strickland inquired as to answered, "We're just whether the district was discussing a plan of action to anywhere near finding funding get this issue rolling, we will for an athletic facility and if have plenty of public hearings G they intended to get serious on the matter as Dr. Gillum G with the City in a joint brings us progress reports." A utilization project. "We can't CISD Superintendent wait too long,"he said,"We're Dr. Ted Gillum told the Board already 10 to 12 years behind that at its present growth rate on this issue." the district would reach the At almost every board Class 5A level in three years. meeting several people address "I would like the Board i ........t.: the Board during the Public to give us (administration) a Forum as to the need for a charge to look into this matter. larger stadium, citing Dragon Stadium as it is won't insufficient seating for parents serve our needs when we are a and students and limited 5A school. Our options are to parking space as two major expand the present facility, if — �� reasons. possible,or build a new facility . "It seems a large at the present high school site, 4 contingency of citizens support or find a new piece of property the idea."said Strickland. and build a new stadium." "Time is of the essence, see"Land"page 5 we (the finance committee) need to begin investigating , funding possibilities for a land d purchase right now,"said Board ps member Howard Addison. "We •e all know we will need larger • ",J • facilities, we don't know what , . kind or how big, but the first ` step is land acquisition" The :"s , z .. /�� Board expects it will need 1 l( \ between 40 and 50 acres to �J accommodate their full "wish , list." Although they do not expect to build everything that might be needed at once they do want enough land to hold it all if it ever does get built. "We , don't want these facilities spread all over town if we can ,,, helo it." said Board member '` '" Land for ways to pay for a lane purchase out of existing funds: from page 1 "All we are doing is looking to see if the money might be there The Board members for this purpose," said Addison, discussed what all might be "we aren't going to spend built on the site at any time in n anything now." the future in order to get an idea of how much land would be needed. Whether the City participates in the funding of the project or not, the CISD is moving forward with looking • 4-EWS CLEPPC G Source: • .0l/i f_ �� Date: `�T 63 P&Z action from April 1 .7 meeting Progress Report commission that his company the project for a number of intends to build a one-story reasons including drainage and The Planning and Zoning structure with a masonry lot • Commission voted 5-0 to approve � n exterior density. the of 2.9 acres on and they will not hold any Mr. Lee applied for SF- the rezoning Mill Rd. at their April I n services in the facility. "This will 30 zoning on the property which) meeting, be our corporate office," he said, would allow him to build 8 The roe "we will have about 20 three-quarter acre homesites. The, 1 p p rty has been employees using it Monday commission suggested he abandoned since 1989 when the through Friday." jewelry manufacturing . plant consider redrawing his lots to fit located on it burned. Commissioner Debra no more than six on the acreage The lot has been bou ht Edmondson said, "this property is to better fit with the rest of the g an eye sore, no doubt, and this lots in the area. by Antioch Churches and proposal would be a definite Ministries, a global network of improvement" The request was denied i unaffiliated churches that has on a vote of 4-1. 3,000 member con The property was zoned ' ! j congregations light industrial prior to it bein worldwide. They propose to build g Ken Smith was back f their corporateannexed into the City, therefore it before the commission with his headquarters remained a manufacturingplant i facility on the site. request to rezone 43.6 acres he after it was incorporated into owns between Commerce; Bill Spivey, who owned Southlake. the property until 1990, and still Business Park and Crooked Lane.1 of the adjoining Mr. Smith tabled his request at an� it owns much vote landainjt this Developer Wayne Lee earlier meeting when residents of, requestd leaves the land brought a rezoning request to the Whispering Woods objected to light industrial,es I would rather zonedit commission for a 5.8 acre tract he the intense uses that could locate I be an office." Neighboring homeownersowns on Harrell Drive just west along their back fences. of Florence Elementary Del Kennedy, an School. Mr. Smith was back with j ! employee of Antioch, told the showed up in numbers to oppose see"PBitZ" page 5 I L., I P&z from page 1 a revised application showing office use along Crooked Lane, . office and other similar uses adjacent to Whispering Woods and the rest of the land light industrial. The office zoning along Crooked Lane was approved but the rest was withdrawn by the applicant after commissioners and residents objected to some of the potential uses that could appear under the requested zoning and that there was not enough buffering to sufficiently protect.: the homeowners. 03 godip SPIN ®SPIN News ''� z For more information about Soulhlake,surf the net at: www.ci.southlake.tx.us Conversant Phone System - As part of the city's continuing effort to find efficient methods of communicating upcoming meetings, it is installing a conversant phone system. The system is presently being programmed and should be up and running by mid-April. With CA • this system you will be able to call the number and get an up to date list of all meetings going C on in the city. A A i SPIN Neighborhood 06 - will I have a meeting Thursday, May 11st in the White Chapel Room at Bicentennial Park at 7:00 PM.City Manager Curtis I lawk and Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead will address the timetable for sewer improve- ments, as well as code U enforcement and other pertinent issues. SPIN Neighborhoods 9, 10 & 14 - will hold a meeting ... :23 Thursday,May I,at 7:00 PM at the Lodge in Bicentennial Park. Discussion will be about the proposed gated community at Aubry Estates on White Chapel Rd. The project proposes 14 half to three-quarter acre lots with water features and a park. .......■ tj Call Al Morin at 421-0873. ID SPIN Executive Committee - A will meet on Friday, May 2 at 9:00 AM in the Administration Building. • Neighborhood Watch Groups i - Community Service Officer Carrie Fullington is urging �N` neighborhoods to form watch groups. Call Officer Fullington for help in forming one in your area.481-5581 ext.800. Recycling Expanded - The following items must be placed in a brown paper sack and set inside or beside your recycling bin.They must be separate from other materials in the bin and must not be wet or contaminated with food products: junk mail (including envelopes), cardboard chipboard and household paper • 2*5'P�oEa �9; oS� 9 n' �So_ Et. r I< • G � .t.A Mm0 C") m y..�. a b r 1J.�"..'w O p 0 G g m C m E Z a g.e�.°C7m 9 � P•aoom P ��e a� nvm es2 P -e ita oao o ._a. m �.� .N•o I _mom a A m N �� V Z. ab ^o+ as m 0. 4 -. " o S -*E °_ m O .... me °,=`a -,m °my -m. ° imam ': mo0.7oe °�P,_� � Z ammo a•^ '" a' -o- - e6' "ei , a °' ° m 70 -0,f N m a`Z m a ::P'm O n.0 ti CD m O y ." .� rn .... P0. P P m CD m es O 7r 9 P•am o a m c N 0 W .mm..m n 9 ° m a' Oeo m m 0.•+ m mo m a E 9 [4.7 m meP u, � P0 aco 0Y'o ", eaegP� � (Am ^.Iv^<-0 t.m-•mo m QO oC O tI m y e b•m ^ O .....1�A P ep •6 n 8y� Q ro n p, c E m m £.co P o•^mi, S. - O m „N A N O •ai ewe ° O d "' "t m x H m `6'm P Z• ° aa..,, mf9 v -. Eo max f" m < gWw'p' Eam snag X0•ea`.4 0 faj ^ n 0 r.a.r, o,o e d� .we •m+ n aao .-w o o0. xco mco •-• no c ^.ommm `° ^.A� maoo` CA m ' mm � y.° go og `°e Oa00'••nba• mbfea c° e ' m 0 H P M`�P •.,� a•^ 9`t rn "" m m P m ° n mo d O3wa' -.- E eep'2o m° emLb- ••"nao 0 41rse uoe ofep , mr•e =0409 -Im E a yPpb o., .�CD O O m O N g O N.my y O °•a--.m. .....5.000.04 .m. a m en 6 5 en A m b• °AC 9 m ° 0 0 m P.°. C v 0o d [ , ° w O 0 m n 0 00 0.�.m b m a Cr a.mf eai x.u 0 00 h m 0 •" o.0 CO•-•m oae oo Ca N e o °' p m A < o u, C cs ,sw mA mya a N .0 er 0O,a 01a ma•^-•mo 1O "CI na 0 mom ao ^ mmaa ? roet=m •, 'Por A oD tnma ,, Aemnn. m °aovam..4 " vmm�,9mc„. 9 A goo m..4 .0^ o• m m e. m•n m o o r a- „m� �e fd B 7-'e•:: V m o. H A P O I m n d. a a s 0 C P a p a Oa0 p^.N m`, y t`G ti a'- , ry N n n p P W a m 00 °Oo O m to '� N y d m ."".. N 0^ ^ y m a '$ ,,P,p e m e<eao'Pee .. eaA gaa,mcaem ''Hmpi mate a a m O `� 0 °`G O^ m•O m f .` avy ° moerraipaa�B E �aaaPm �.Y, mmyoe° (� p pp 6 O p s N - m e p,0•N ;E •, R p n w g O 04 .psi C. 0m .41 m �` 0 ^N �� o m m a„ 0.X9 a El am cee -1 o a�ga .-d .ca 77''rp vr.ree �cm p•a m _ • `� er /� _ P'_m a�'ymmOad.mT OTy.0X° 0D•,a. mbmhd [ V e. � nmmP 7a•C° aeonvnerooc0 Ej eEb^ ..i fen 5 o P fan < H< tD m° ^f Cu• m." m W^ Th •-n P N G•y eta ° ., a a�° ..m . Q � °,•� a9mmoom oap �e� :; o '=oeOy25Cm m •< a•p '+ to H 7 m ai_e o eP .-i. .o • 0.0. r� 0 m Cn m m my •C-+o < O 0 lee Ice m .^y. ° a•m a N d v d:'"^^`« ."-'.. 'e 8 0 m }� 9Pofze ".� •, 9 ••dd9 9a'$• 09 a.° •» pN v gang cO »emoBmlAw -I egom < c� canm. ° 9i Gw fu.►• m 8 � m 9 m c o PW e -� "maw 0aper m 0 00 ham. O fap aH b' m O.C(p p a-m<i m •O-w C7 O C' `��i• .°, o f 8. rb'� e�g ' m 9.e .,ci a fe o nm o•xdg Nato° F. eoam �.0 "=• IVN �CS ea 0. ....'-' 0 "111 • ..�■ E Cr oEti aanE mom •, C m m0 * 11.�..y1 m a a.a N a m •-+a r-• to a 0 P.,,eY oo MO 0.0 d 0.0 07 m V a y a C ee ~b m P .� •!00 O E C E N Oo p' O ewe A 0o cr e`�' O Y C rim C m y mom �.�< m Co a^ m � cm � ypac hp�ool� �, O A m 0e ..an ° 9 m ^ -"•0 9 ep m 3.9meD C7 mmfe = mm X re ecnm " ' aooPci n .<9m........ CO o m " o0 9 om m o b, '-' ,0, m P' N m -e -mj a m ,-.. ,-.co fan 00 ..-• N -,° e .m. m .T a o, e G m..7,° eA- 9mginboo nao .-mo0.0Pm m .- m = V • T < m ff pv m E ,e„ �+ C m O d•O m `,j a . .1.... ° 0 ." 9 n m ...... m a s-.N e•p m m m •, m m c• av E •, ° Saa O w a a o 6` p• n•O eCo C s-0 m O m • 0 e. p•-. m •m'e d 0. •m+ a0• m P a,N 7.C� mmy•oaa$r ..Ca m p2�oaog0 aamammm --aii. • .�r.g ^ aoa mxam '+ a CD c --icaoaea° Eea el' m • �.O �•y a 0 01 a,ry m E 0 M p P m�n P a. an bi m 9-4 m m m m 9 D m a -^ o•o a.0 '— rf $�mo a oo a�9 - oo ....g.MI m a• C y . c m0 0m` ce mmf. " -mipy m QM P•m E S o n P o m a•<y m � 0 g Y� P o en m a... o•0 9 ° c eg c r y m•< F � ma m 00 •0^, 0 a o a k m N 00 .ems. 0 O 00 men oao -, • mmmE � g'wbe7o a O °' m .......• :om oomm � a..0 ° n m 3`11 ,°� `° 'gym mdme00 b'm m`<ac BA9a^ C.and o m0 - am qsr a�000 m•bo�.A mo* rsaa', -''' � . 10 ? ? P -+ m m77o; 'nePin = -Q7 °; om fie '• NEWS CLtPPGNG Source: i '\LA i11Q - Date: g Facts/figures i g regarding half- cent sales tax News and Times • As ofApril,$1,849,031 has been collected since the inception of the • half-cent sales tax for the devel- opment of park and recreation fa- cilities.It is expected that an addi- tional $502,190 will be collected this fiscal year due to the growth the commercial retail sector. The seven member Board has overseen the expenditure of funds to: 1) Expand Bicentennial Park and construct improvements; 2) Build a joint use gymnasium (see "Sales,"page 2) with Carroll Independent School District on the campus of Carroll Middle School; and 3) Purchase property located in Bob Jones Park and begin to implement Bob Jones and Bicen- tennial Park Master Plans. These future projects are being pursued: Bicentennial Park im- provements and land acquisition to approximately 58 acres;Bob Jones I land acquisition and development I (more than 140 lots still need to be purchased); parking at CISD middle school joint use gym;trail 1 construction along the city's south- ' ern boundary, as well as compo- nents of the Trail System Master, Plan;joint use facilities and neigh- borhood park planning. NEWS CLIPPING Source: t/ i , I Date: a�0 I I , i Southlake, Grapevine mayors to finally settle High-steaks bet- :-- 1 BY ANDREW BACKOVER feed starts at 7 p.m. Star-Telegram Staff Writer "I was beginning to get Southlake Mayor Rick Sta- worried about it,"Tate said. i cy would never welch on a bet "He kept promising,but he —particularly one with his kept putting me off." cousin Grapevine Mayor The bet went like this.Tlo'" I William D.Tate. losing mayor and council 4�, Tonight,he will pay up in would buy steaks for their;' ;' _' beef. counterparts,and the winners Almost seven months after would serve the losers plates of Grapevine High School beans. whipped Carroll High School Since October,Tate has on the football field, basked in the glow of Grapevine's City Council and Grapevine's 28-14 victory over department heads will eat rib- Carroll,just one highlight dur- eye steaks at the Grapevine ing a season in which the Central Fire Station—cour- undefeated Mustangs won tesy of the Southlake mayor. their first state football chain.- Stacy,Southlake City Council pionship.Now,his booty.will:: members and several depart- include steaks from the Kroger ment heads will eat beans.The (More on BET on Page 12) • I, I I . i \ • A / E � ' \ E §' � � ? 0:1 i ge.� 2c n o ,_. & 5_ $ \ ƒ c. . 0� � 2 § 7 / � § � 2 n _ n r. c ] E ).� § - cro fit) F.7. co o ƒ� g Q cn - } � E o2 � 2 � } c 5 o3 d F — k3 2 - ' , § n a k o ' Q ® / o \ ° c 0 . « - ƒ�� •� � � • O. I /� \ m \� ± & �a. � / ° �w ° o• . n co co o ® » - \nr -} � f _ / / 7� \ � A a m S + E E j / Jk �k ƒ3 � 2 / ) � � © � egE Ec1 ° cA / So ƒ § - . / E 2 § t ° p ƒ 7 = A / A Cr/ A ° , § g 7 00 n 7 = Q \ ƒ § ir7- n - 3.�- \ f go 2 ƒ . i _ 0 / RaE - m B « D q ƒ • $ §. 2 - q ƒ 2 ƒ o- = n o. \ M i 2 _. = § A E ƒ / n *"• � § 2 0 / K oell . i Q _ K r . * a o E. » o ° k \ . \ 0 / - 0 / j / ** \ E 2 g 0Ew .CD Eeo - o c ■ n 0 D \ § a \ •• - YEWS CLtPPCYG Source: ` J,{J(10, c� �� 14-Date: a'�' Antioch Churches & Ministries site plan gets approval by P&Z by Ryan S. Otto come in years from now and say, The Planning and Zoning Corn- 'Hey that's office space. They're mission voted unanimously to ac- not worshiping and fellowshiping cept the re-zoning and site plan for in there,'" said Peter Brown,who Antioch Churches and Ministries was representing the church. during its April 17 meeting. Brown's concerns arose when The site is located on the south the commission began discussing side of Randol Mill Avenue at the different types of zoning codes ap- I� intersection of Marantha Way and propriate for the land. Randol Mill Avenue. Commissioner Rex Potter said The current zoning for one tract the land should be zoned C-3, was AG, or agricultural district, which includes but is not limited and S-P-1, or detailed site plan to church use. • district, for another. The applica- After the commission clarified, tion requested S-P-1 zoning for the the terms"church"and"religious second tract, which is defined by institution,"Brown said he didn't the city to include multiple land feel the church's use for that facil- use and which will establish a ity fit into those constraints. compatible land use. "We are a(501)C3,which is the The motion to approve the Internal Revenue Service's defini- project followed several revisions tion of a church," Brown said. to the application and a lengthy "Our objective at this complex is discussion concerning the type of not to be a place of worship but to zoning to be used. facilitate the missionary activities. "I think this is definitely an of- "For lack of a better word, we fice space,"said Joe Wright,chair- will be the corporate headquarters man of the P&Z. "That's not re- for our organization." ally the issue here in my opinion." The type of zoning stated in the Early in the hearing, represen- commission's motion was S-P-1, tatives from Antioch Churches and which the commission felt would Ministries had expressed concerns accommodate Antioch's intended, that the zoning might not be prop- use. erly designated. According to Brown, the site' "We don't want someone to (see "Zoning,"page 3) Zoning from page 1 will house the main office of each national organization for the dif- fcrcnt ministries of the church. "The head of our mission orga- nization will operate out of this office,for example,"Brown said. "The question here before us is • do we want this office, or do we want the land used as light Indus trial property?" Wright asked the commission. "A vote against this will be a vote to maintain light industrial use on the property,"previous land owner Bill Spivey said. Spivey, who sold the land in 1990 but still owns other land in the area, told the commission at last Thursday's meeting that this project will effect him most. "If this land stays zoned the same, it'll be a development of a lesser quality than this," Spivey said. The property, which was brought into the city with light in- dustrial land use already attached to it, has several large concrete slabs on it that were left from pre- vious construction. "I'd like to see the property cleaned up and landscaped a little,"Wright said. Although the applicant agreed the slabs should be removed, no verbal commitment to do so was made. "I don't have the authority to answer that question because it involves a great deal of money," Brown said when the commission asked if the church would remove the concrete slabs.• The commission eventually re- quired that all concrete slabs be removed and that a buffer zone be established next to residential property which would include landscaping. The building height was also limited to one story by the • commission's recommendation and will be constructed of a syn- thetic stone masonry material. The use of the facility was de- fined by the commission as "an office in support of ministry." SEWS CLEPPLN"G Li-- )-9 I Date: \ , , ' y I '._ ..' - 1 ,,i, ' ! source: \--11 ' ' ' d, Photo . , 1 '? by Aaron .. , • ,, A,„ seams toer / -J , •••,.;..- 04,,,r, ..„.. , , • - -,-,---, .. • • -„,,,- -,,,,,, 0,-; ,,,,,,,,p,--. ,,....„,„Ily 1.,,,,,•,,„„,.,,,,,,.„. , low . ,•.-,.'' '''' . A,,..1,. ,...1 ‘,. - -_ 4.,--1 - (:,-1:,,,,,,ci, ,:, ' ,,..„-, , ..,-", ,- ''' ':..._. •:.,. ' - A,,,,44.1.24, ' ''''- 1:'-'41, t ;... .„ 14:;:'X ,, 1,11: '41';'''''''''''': - -- - .- Y -,,. , . ... , . - '''','''' . ' ,, - ',0- - -''. ,jir.,44g 44,01er. ''''''''N'',., • ": ' ' ' . 417:5:'..,4 , 1 ,;.--4.1*. ' ' ,„,e,.. .4 , ',„ .., : •:;-%°,°,-. ,..1 , .., '':- ,,, , ,,),,..'„':-:•;,,;„,:,:., ‘,.', ' .4- .. -- , ;' :----,- s:i ""' ', '' ' -i,-i,, ,,i'46.ci4'-'• v<',..,1:,,i;i3ii.4i,Z,44*‘'. :,-"'-': , - , ,,-„,,,,,,,-,:;,:.-,-t,,i, ik ..'t ---4!:' ;I:,i,.7-A,Mei.z...-i---,•4. '4,..tit#1,',-' - 1 - ,;,•'''''w;'*• -,*--;:'..---;4 iii.,-) -.!---77 t4,4--?4,v!..t(2.1 .,:,t,.-.\:.-,:,,,,k 4%,-,:1I-ir.5:„," 1 -''''!'".-':' ''' '''''''''' ''' ' 1 -'—'4 6'7•4' -, -4V, ,i ,- ---- . •14*-4., .z.,-.1„.,, ,,, . - . ,'. .. --.. - „A, ,, ,P..---,..,.',-•:•-., .- -'t;':1 '.., 4, '''''''-'4,...A4.:WV''',''','*,.-i,,:.4.::t;;; 1-': •- '.,, ' .."-• ,,,, ' ''' festival.ett,_4"?,44 at the -•.,..,-s:,- ••:.:t.u....- :..!: ' '- '.,...k •i. ''.;...;g:".......,,,,,,„..i • to be flown ,li:Afirr. --t‘ ' .1,- '''.;;•,:c '- " ti, ./.2 ,r;;;;,,-,,,,,' 1„:ssta of the kites , V.44, ,".4.)g,ta ff a few t '',•1-.'--ii.-";.- 1,--4 , t Kathy festivities ., ,...„.„.. ......-, r • ' and for up Albert Almendarez,Jeff Long Nixie show o crafts to kites Southlake gearing From arts and "We'll pray for . , 1 and clowns,Celebration a variety of ear.- area was S. Otto s feature this " ihlake 1845 by Ryan inuthlake offer lake will tire co d Tracy minu-,.,,,,„ - , .tyetau originally community events,_,,„, .... ., ,_. nally settle of ,, . .s, oSfofiuotheierfso,rputhbolicoity. won plan to for the en • the small sai formation ._,,„ •., . I in- Living plenty of Southo-f as And local re .,...,4141414K-iy 5 - ebrate the 40th . 1956. Dove. ,,,,p narre 3) ' ' l' dgaoroodunwdeather Lonesome "Festival,"page„.. Sd°esirfdaelnts things. , , , . , ,. anniversary (see r e its incorporation "Unfortunately, we've celebrate with a Celebration their c.ity festival,fairand kite at Rieen- weather in • recent years," p.m. Southlake bad noon to 7 from to be held in Park.tennial had Festival competition at the festival and Live musical entertainment will • have several kites on hand to be offered throughout the-day. from page 1 present in a kite exhibition. Funnel cakes,hot dogs,hamburg- And although the actual date of "Kit4n$'s a lot bigger than ers and other food items will be' Southlake's anniversary was last p-- p '' i °• -y eo le think it is, he said. available at booths and a main fall,Southers said the city is plan- At the festival, booths spon- food tent. ning to celebrate all this year. sored by various Southlake busi- At 10 a.m.,prior to the kite fes- In the Parks and Recreation nesses, organizations and city de- tival,friends ofAmy Stefanko and ` Department's kite competition, partments will offer activities her family are hosting a"Walk for which will begin around noon, ranging from face painting to a Amy"to help provide financial as- awards will be given to the larg- raffle for the popular Beanie Baby sistance for the child's medical est, smallest and best homemade stuffed toys. bills. kites. "There will be a Southlake ce- Amy Stefanko, an 8-year-old In addition to the 1,000 kites- lebrity dunk tank at the festival," student at Durham Elementary Southlake already plans to give Southers said."But I can't say who School, was diagnosed with leu- away, the city is offering a free is going to be in it." kemia in 1994.Since last October, kite-making workshop for children The Parks and Recreation De- a series of treatments has accumu- ages 5 to 12 on April 26 in the partment and Board, along with lated about $800,000 in medical Lodge at Bicentennial Park.Five- the Youth Park Board, will spon- expenses. to 8-year-olds will meet from 9 to sor a game booth with a football. The group sponsoring the"Walk 11 a.m., with 9- to 12-year-olds toss as well as information about forAmy"invites citizens of South- meeting from noon to 2 p.m. future parks in Southlake. lake to find sponsors or to spon The workshop will provide all In addition,the Keep Southlake sor themselves or their families the materials necessary for chil- Beautiful and Parks and Recre- and participate to raise money. dren to make homemade kites ation booths will give free The group plans to meet at the which can be entered in the cope- composting bins and T-shirts to White's Chapel entrance to Bicen- petition on May 3.Jeff Long,vice residents interested in beginning a tennial Park the day of the festi- president of Jewels of the Sky kite home composting system. val. club, will teach the seminar. Even the canine branch of the For more information about the Long, a professional kite de- Southlake Department of Public workshop,call the Parks and Rec- signer,will also help judge the kite Safety will put on a presentation. reation at 281-5581, Ext. 756. Source: NEWS CLLPPGYG Dace: New Westlake aldermen reclaim di[sannexed land Mayor ousted by old board is granted new hearing By Joy Dickinson Northeast Tarrant Bureau of The Dallas Morning News WESTLAKE — A new board of aldermen put Westlake in a reverse spin Friday, reclaiming more than 90 percent of recently disannexed land and granting ousted mayor Scott Bradley a new hearing. An emotional Mr. Bradley said Friday's decision effectively rein- states him. "I fully plan to preside Monday night," he said later, refer- ring to the next regular board meet- ing. However, Westlake's future is far from clear. Neighboring cities, the courts and dissident aldermen could still alter its course: Mr. Bradley was dismissed from office in mid -April by four alder- men who accused him of official misconduct, charges for which Mr. Bradley said they had no evidence. It was unclear whether Dale White, whom aldermen appointed mayor after Mr. Bradley's removal, would also attend Monday's meet- ing. Mr. White did not attend Friday afternoon's meeting and could not be reached for comment. It also remains ambiguous exact- ly what the board will govern: the 4,700 acres that constituted West- lake a week ago, or the 400 acres left after two massive disannexations that included Ross Perot Jr.'s Circle T Ranch and Westlake's portion of the Solana office complex. Saturday's election gave oppo- nents of the disannexations a ►�a- jority vote. They include incumbent Alderman Fred Held and newcom- ers Charla Bradshaw and Abe BiA Jr. Proponents included board members Carroll Huntress and Please see NEW on Page 29A. 10 w O KT W= -0 'd w w \o -1 w w n '» w o 77,oaGµie°p_p.w.•amwyq - * :p�C, w'" = d O O A G: p gc w p ap Oq y7' w" w p C -.m pcn m a w m m CDp ti odcc 0O m4�Cl. y. 4to ts"._ OmabOC�000h m O w a, m p chi! p m y� 2 d p m o o a m C °' ' .a`'. y ti a °, SD � M rA d � �b,o°m w�a�'�"mCD cnw , mtiAo,gym w p; p. CD CM -1 m •R• `< �, - y fAD ti `.0 y �< O p .A-. o mWo ID y o vmi o x 0 � m cn�� m� �' (D m a CD Gr wIypmak s .•, v� pa� ba'; ti o�m� mCD 'I m ItCD (lDoawp :pgim0�* tim CD °� �°oyv p14. ° CO pm°° p Cc, o _ip C C p m oa ca�p4 "��0 F cmE;P-CD "m00 m�-°l�ac�um gyMpap 'm* mm Ioy��.'.y•per<6 <`<wC aO�+ `°dm�mOdp 0. 3 Paqq P. m m pO pro m' p .p om140 co ma0 " M a w a �, iD y ", cD x w m m 0 Cr'd < p o p o• 0.0 p 0 0.a p d •+ w w �� co p•� m w m o m R 4 CD cn C m m: on M " w dc" y o p ° Hai o c�u cw� o o coo y p Aw `� O 9 CD p p aq p G y p m v' '* r+ p oq CA�- < a °,'p opq -. °. cG �D y 0.0 Q' y m CD " C apq O �' ,mA, O s' O p �=* n °° CDA.vp s � Y aq aq a. p a. m G m cmi, w x 0.y wA . m Crr am m M°9G C m' g qpp< o m0 , m H a Q M �� W° p aao .• w w A ai 0° m m °''voptiy"kA w A O'cnpampm pA p CD p O=r m.1 pOz mOp m mm m , O n A A O wA CD w •1 n a' 11 p w� '•' '� d a 7s „n! �! O �. p d< p m p n �. ,cy a _�'; • � .pA r�'. _a,m �. m O•maa'm w m C'.Go o 's .0 I ca G. w A. y m 0 r_•Am mm n y w aC O .: D o r. ° p m� cua t,y+ -s C A QQ G r wn 'Ct mwp m1A.aq 0m-.arrN,Yo myy mppypr- mwm'° yaw 0Om m cn �' aq � v' Qo 'C ma° �ypM Gr'+O<mmoo" w o m p r. A m y p m aq �' m cD r , CD . . s n .+, p `aO<p < "1 G m fA .< wF,•,'ppdaa 0O my yw�.�"pm ,, mm m '0 �°CDm�..a = CS. a mA . o p is 5.Ocn SD "M °�9� mCm —WO :'0 o p' O -OA O C o pH G' w m `� m a p m p' y p m 0 p m CD E CD Pr H p o cn O `< Cf can V C m m aq a Imp °��'• O tr a �' m m c a C M w p ti A a o o +< N a p a m h o m y v, m mamm� c> oar ..r� any CND .� a C CCD AD ,••r O ,••r r.: O.`C p m N fdD ti A'ii 7v p m -m m O r+ w m m ... p O� a cn O a �•* a m H r. dv, w0 0 r:oir �' r. ;;�.��'.a� �a°+obaomop =0 CDopaga y� �� d << ab o m $b0 o-Es °.' p q0 CD m 1p m w a aaaga p' Fa r N �O o w R � �o I � Sa o � v 3� �CDco`.,�5•wO i1Q � �� cc c w C-D L , v, O n w 'c7 y QIQ Cl C7 d?5mo�� o AaaCl- �j' CD wo 5.g a: a. `� 3,�. U Q v .go 'O gyp- - b 2 O (l^ CD O C. O cc'S CD CD 01 UPo C�E F�U1' 'R °o° w g. 9 � " n o d o� o m O ti O o "j C. S_wa@o cn 'o'w2 �' O a3 coo fn' M. cn w z p O c , 02.0 C G: Lam'. O m c boo ac o �dco ay p;- r��'c�o� �nE �`'�ay�•= �r• cro+ M O O O O N• �• O C ;n O O 7c' o ao � oo E c ••,CD , � CD w T Fy 3.e ° _S A O a N J Iz 0 Is - CIS S, H m A Internet t r From Page 1 ;s who arrested Todd on April 26. Police confiscated 30 to 40 illi gal images from Todd's com- puter and charged him with pos session and promotion of ch".d Pornography, each a third-de;ree felony punishable by up ,10 years in prison. Such busts in which two com- puter -literate police agencies cogperate, Ward and DiMatteo said, are exceedingly rare. "That may be one of the one or too cases a year that work out that way," Ward said. "Nobody has this as a specialty unit — per- sonnel assigned to this full time. So what you get generally is frag- mented -type investigations and some interagency cooperation." — The skimpy police effort is no indication of the problem's size, investigators said. • "I'm sure that if every police 4epartment in this country could dedicate two detectives to work this full time, they'd still have more work than they could han- dle," DiMatteo said. Local departments work with joint task forces incorporating several agencies. Almost no police departments have specific units to work Internet -related child abuse cases. At most agencies, one or two officers with a bit of Internet savvy take online child -porn cas- qs. In Fort Worth, vice squad investigators handle the majority of the few online cases. Most federal agents and police officers who battle the computer- ized child -porn trade admit that they are woefully underfunded And disorganized. "Where are [cops] on the infor- mation superhighway? They are road -kill," said Peter Banks, director of training and outreach for the National Center for Miss- ing and Exploited Children in Arlington, Va., and a former child abuse detective with the District of Columbia police. In a recent study, the center .identified 17,653 police depart- ments throughout the country. Of :those, about 8,000 had fax machines, he said. "If they don't have the technol- ogy to have a fax machine, .how. . many do you suppose ,.are online?" Banks said. "It costs toci much money. Manpower -wise, you hire people to be cops, not because they're computer savvy. ,,..-'How do.l,as a $henff ,;,.Justi fy the use of one. of my, 10 deputies to sit ut f�oAt of .a� com- puter to have conversations and catch' a child exploiter online? It's very difficult." NEWS CLIPPING Source: Tarrant Business I Date: May 12, 1997 Super Crown Books leases in Southlake SOUTHLAKE — Super Crown Books Corp., one of the nation's leading booksellers, has signed a lease for a store in a new Southlake shopping cen- ter — as well as at two previ- ously disclosed sites in Fort Worth — as part of its multi - store entry into the Metroplex. 1 The Landover, Md.- based retailer has signed an agreement with T&M Southlake Development Co., owner of The Shops at Village' Center" currently under. dexel opment along Texas 114,Y i according to county deed records posted last week.A,,.x.�1 memorandum of lease dated March 21 shows that Crown will"occupy space on the west;: side of the planned Kroger.` News of the lease comes. about five months "after local real estate sources disclosed that Crown had contracts for ... two Fort Worth locations: the;;_. Eastchase Market complex —ate Interstate.30 andastcbas�e: . Parkway and Bellaire Plaza on A.LtS t'.r South Hulen Street iri Fort Worth. Deed records show memo- randums of lease have been filed for both Fort Worth loca-'. tions. Source: NEWS CLE'PL`(G Lawsuits are filed to regain Westlake Board wants back disannexed land - BY MILES MOFFEIT AND SUSAN GILL VARDON Star -Telegram Staff Writers WESTLAKE — The new Board of Aldermen and Scott + Bradley launched a three -prong court attack yesterday to save the town, filing lawsuits against Fort Worth and Southlake and a coun- terclaim against Roanoke to try to reverse recent disannexations that have left Westlake's boundaries in shreds. Also yesterday, Bradley appealed to the Texas Supreme Court to uphold a district court ruling blocking his removal from the mayor's office. Saying he can still act as mayor, Bradley also vetoed the disannexation of the Solana office complex from Westlake into Southlake's juris- diction. Alderman Carroll Huntress, a member of the old board that approved the disannexations, said yesterday that the lawsuits are meaningless because Bradley has no authority to act as mayor. "Dale White has been legally ; put in as the mayor of Westlake,",., Huntress said. "He [Bradley] ha$ been legally dismissed and (Mnrn nn WP-OTT.AKE on Page 6) Date: 4;�— Westlake From Page 1 replaced as mayor. That's accord- ing to the law." White could not be reached to comment last night. The new Board of Aldermen met last night, ratifying its vote at Fri- dav's special meeting to repeal the disannexations approved by Alder- men Huntress, Al Oien. Howard Dudley and Jerry Moore. 'I'hc board — consisting of ('bar - la Bradshaw, Abe Bush and Fred Held — also elected Bradshaw as mayor pro tern and, amid hoots and cheers and a standing ovation. re- scated Bradlcy as mayor. "Needless to say. this is fantas- tic." Bradley told the audience of 55. "1 view this as one more step by our ciiiiens toward taking back our town." The lawsuits, filed late yesterday. *aim to invalidate recent actions that took from the town more than 3,000 acres, most of it owned by de- veloper Ross Perot Jr., and ceded it to bordering cities. The disannexations, according to the lawsuits against Fort Worth and Southlake. "were taken in violation of the provisions of the Open Mcel- ings Act ... were not taken at duly and lawfully called meetings of the governing body of Westlake; and were replete with conflicts of inter- est on the part of the individuals voting for such actions." Because the outgoing Board of Aldermen's actions were "flagrant violations of state law," the lawsuits state, attempts by the bor- dering cities to extend their bound- aries are void. Officials of Fort Worth. Roano- ke and Southlake said they are con- fident that they are following prop- er legal procedures to extend their jurisdiction to the properties. Fort `.North City Attorney Wade Adkins said he will ask City Council mcmbcr� today in execu- tive session whether they want to seek a court's declaratory judgment on which city's extraterritorial ju- risdiction should include the former Westlake properties. But Adkins said he is "not par- ticularly" concerned about the ef- forts of Bradley and his supporters to undo Fort Worth's actions to place disannexed parts -)f Westlake within Fort Worth's extraterritorial jurisdiction. Southlake Mayor Rick Stacy em- phasized that his city did not. ini- tiate action to extend its ju- risdiction to the Solana complex. which had made up 95 percent of Westlake'stax base. \II I can say is that we signed off on something that was agreed to by Westlake and brought by So- lana." he said. "We did not knock on anybody's door asking for this." would not be empowered to grant & Weatherly, the law firm thath'as any relief from such wrongs." represented the aldermen since In other action last night. the April. Board of Aldermen approved On Thursday, the comptrollet's opening a new checking account at office froze about $2.4 million %hat the Westlake branch of Keller State Westlake has in the state's murfiti- Bank and authorized Bush. Held pal investment fund after questions and Town Secretary Ginger Cross- arose about the transfer. wy to write checks. The aldermen also agreed that After one resident asked Dist a sl two signatures would be required night the transfer could he a rf-' for any check greater than sighed as "embezzlement," Bradley Lion i, and that it would be a violation recommended that he board next any individual wrote multiple a week discuss any legal action on the checks of $1,000 each to pay town withdrawal. bills for greater than that amount. "It is a matter of this board to -in - Last week- Huntress told officials vestigate whether we have a cause in the state Comptroller's Office to of action to get reimbursement 'of wire $87.000 to the town's checking those funds," Bradley said. account at Keller Slate Bank. Staff writers Kristin Sullivan, Huntress wrote at least 67 checks Bryon Okada and Bill Hornaday for $1,000 each to Wood. Thacher contributed to this report. Stacy said he believes that West - lakes mayor is White, appointed May 2 by the old Board of Alder- men. "Someone needs to explain to Scott Bradley who is the mayor." Stacv said. "According to a judge's ruling and the court order I've seen, someone else is the mayor. 1 talked with the mayor jWhitcj today — had lunch with him, in fact. You would think if the mayor of Westlake was fixing to file suit against vou. he would have told me.' The old Boatd of Aldermen dis- amtexed more than Ill percent of Westlake, including their own properties and Perot's Circle 'I Ranch, on election eve May 2. In the Mav 3 election, two of the al. dermen were replaced, giving ma- jority control to aldermen who sup- port Bradley as mavor instead of White. The new town officials said they filed the lawsuits in an attempt to prevent the stale Legislature from rubber-stamping the disannexation actions. Every session, state law- nnakcrs pass a sweeping measure validating annexations and disan- nexations that have not been chal- lenged in a two-year time -frame. Westlake resident David Brown filed a lawsuit in Denton County District Court last week challeng- ing the disannexations, but a judge refused to grant a restraining order. The case is pending. Town Attorney Paul Isham and the other aldermen agreed that the town needed to be on record as challenging the land secessions, Bradley said. „.Phis suit directly challenges all the disannexations," he said. In his appeal to the Texas Su- preme Court, Bradley asks that the court overturn a state Court of Ap- peals ruling that Tarrant County District Judge Bob McGrath had no jurisdiction to try to block his ouster. The appeals court twice is- sued orders rebuking McGrath for issuing restraining orders that Bra- dley sought to remain in office. Bradley called the aldermen's at- tempt to discharge him as unconsti- tutional. saying the statute autho- rizing the proceeding improperly allowed them to act as judge, jury and witnesses. Bradley attorney Eldridge Goins, who has repeatedly stated the aldermen's views were preju- diced going into the trial, argues in the petition to the Supreme Court that the appeals court failed to +'even review the record of the al- dermen trial holding that the pro- prietary of these proceedings had no bearing on their decision." According to the ruling. Goins states in the petition, "mobsters could have tried Bradley in an il- legal proceeding with complete dis- regard of his legal and constitu- tional rights and vet the courts Source: NEWS CL EPMG Date: Section B, Page 6 / Star -Telegram / Thursday, May 15,1997 ,N Bedford woman in hospital � after Southlake bike accident Star -Telegram SOUTHLAKE — A Bedford woman was in fair condition at a Fort Worth hospital yesterday, a day after she was knocked from her bicycle by a chunk of con- crete protruding from a truck, police said. Debra Wright, 38, suffered a broken leg in the accident about 7:15 p.m. Tuesday in the 500 block of Peytonville Avenue. when a dump truck passed her, Southlake Department of Public Safety spokesman Malcolm Jack- son said. A large piece of con- crete jutting from the truck struck Wright, knocking her to the ground, he said. Wright and another Bedford resident, Armando Dominguez, were riding their bicycles in the same direction as the truck, Jack- son said. Wright was conscious and talking when paramedics ar-� rived, he said. A short time after the accident, Timothy Gipson, 37, of Burleson was arrested on suspicion of leav- ing the scene of an accident, Jackson said. He was taken into custody in the 700 block of Southridge Lakes Parkway, where he had pulled off to the side of the road, Jackson said. Gipson was released yesterday after posting bail of $2,500 on a charge of failure to stop and ren- der aid, Jackson said. Gipson told investigators that he saw the woman fall off the bi- cycle in his rear-view mirror, "but he said he thought she just hit loose gravel or dirt," Jackson said. Wright was taken by helicop- ter ambulance to Harris Method- ist Fort Worth hospital. C" 'G Z s d m A NEWS CL1PPDiG Source: Date: `)-1 LP - Southlake City Council Action for May 6 The Southlake City Council in regular session May 6 took national and owned by Southlake Church of Christ. 58.202 acres located on the south - action on the following items: • Tabled until May 20 a cast corner of the intersection of Dove Road and SH 114, owned by • Approved by a 6-1 vote (Fawks against) the second Site Plan for Tetco Conve- nience Store on 0.918 Timarron Land Corporation. reading of a Site Plan and Re- acres on the northwest corner of • Approved the first reading of a Concept Plan and Rezoning from zoning from Agricultural to "S- P-1" Detailed Site Plan limited N. Peytonvi l le and W. Southlake Blvd. Agricultural to Non-Residential- to Office- 1 uses for 1.344 acres currently zoned Commercial-3, ap- PUD for a mixed use business park for Timarron Commercial, Tract II, located at 1302 W. Southlake Blvd., applied for by Medical plied for by Tetco Stores Inc. on 271.908 acres located east of N. Air Services and owned by and owned by SouthRidge Center, L.P. . White Chapel, west ofN. Carroll and north ofSH 114, owned by Timarron Jerry Black. • Tabled until May 20 Land Corporation. • .Approved the second read- ing of a Rezoning from Agri- the second reading of an or- dinance granting consent to • Approved the first reading of a Site cultural and Residential-PUD the assignment and transfer Plan and Rezoning from Agri- cultural to "S-P-I" Detailed Site Plan to Single Family-30 for 0.773 of cable television system for Antioch Church and Ministries acres located east of Timarron Addition, Brenwyck, Phase 2, and franchise from Harron Cablevisibn tb Marcus on 2.9571 acres located on the south and at the east end of the Cable. side of Randol Mill at the itit6tsdc-. tion of Marantha Way,a lied for pp Durham Court cul-de-sac, a - p plied for by Mike and Carol Approved the second by G. Phillip Morley, owned by John Rucker. reading of Ordinance No. Kelly. • Approved the second read- 665-A, amending Ordi- nance No. 665, amending • Approved the first reading of a, Concept Plan and Rezoning from ing of a Concept Plan and Re- zoning from Single Family -IA Fiscal Year 96-97 Annual Budget. Agricultural to Single Family-30 for and Community Service to Mid -year review. • Approved the second 5.8438 acres located on the south - Community Service for reading of a Concept Plan west corner of Johnson Road and Harrell Drive, owned by Wayne Lee. Southlake Church of Christ lo- cated on the southwest corner and Rezoning from Agri- "S-P-2" • Approved the first reading of a of Brock Drive and W. FM cultural to Gener- alized Site Plan for please see CITY COUNCIL 1709, applied for by FDS Inter- Timarron Commercial on on page 3 aveX CITY COUNCIL from page I Rezoning from Agricultural to Light Industrial for 29.51 acres located on the east side of Crooked Lane approximately 560' south of the intersection of E. Southlake Blvd. and Crooked Lane, owned by Ken Smith. • Approved the first reading of Rezoning from Agricultural to Office-1 for 8.55 acres on the east side of Crooked Lane ap- proximately 560' south of the intersection of E. Southlake Blvd. and Crooked Lane, owned by Ken Smith. • Tabled until July 15 the first reading of a Rezoning from Ag- ricultural to Single Family- 1B for 6.311 acres at 320 W. High- land, owned by Terry Robert Seaborn. • Approved the first reading of Rezoning from Community Service to Single Family-20B for 0.505 acres located on the northeast comer of E. Dove and Royal Oaks Court, applied for by Dennis E. McConn. • Approved requested vari- ances to Sign Ordinance No. 506-A for Village Center, Phases 1 and 11 and request to discussion regarding berm be- hind Kroger along SH 114. • Approved Commercial De- veloper Agreement for Christian Men's Network, located on the south side of Countryside Court, approximately 500' west of the intersection ofN. White Chapel Blvd. • Authorized the Mayor to execute a contract for sale of 1.22 acres located in the T. Eas- ter Survey, Abstract No. 474 (Lyford Tract). • Authorized the Mayor to execute a contract for sanitary sewer improvements in N. Peytonville Ave. to construct a six-inch sanitary sewer line from east of Myers Meadow to ap- proximately 300' to the east of Ten Bar Trail. • Authorized the Mayor to execute a contract for ground storage tank and Booster Pump Station No. 1 (W. Southlake Blvd. at Pearson Lane) to con- struct an intruder resistance fence. • Authorized the City Man- ager to execute a lease agree- ment on the Dove Elevated Water Tower, 100 W. Dove St., with Southwestern Bell Wire- less, Inc. • Authorized the Mayor to execute a contract with HDR Engineering for professional services on FM 1709 Traffic Management Study. Southlake Journal 817-488-1770 Ij a! A W, s orner May 3rd was proclaimed Arbor Day in Southlake by Major Stacy at the Kite Festival. A beautiful Choctaw Pecan was gifted to the city by KSB in honor of Arbor Day and can be enjoyed at the Wildscape site in Bicentennial Park. KSB would also like to thank Green Cakes Nursery for their donation of time and materials in the planting of this beautiful tree. The pecan tree is a wonderful shade tree as well as a source of food which makes it a wonderful selection for the Wildscape. The nature nuts are smaller with thicker shells, but according to Howard Garrett, have a superior quality of meat and oil. The Choctaw, how- ever, is a preferred hybrid. Other tree selections for the Wildscape that produce edibles are the Mexican Plum and the Texas persimmon. The Mexican plum is one of Howard Garrett's favorite ornamental trees. It has fragrant and edible flowers in spring, and then small purple plums in the fall for making jams and jellies. The persimmon is a better food for wildlife than people. It is a large growing shade tree that produces fruit in the late fall; the fruit is usually sour until after the first frost. The bark is a dark and heavily fissured and the leaves are lovely yellow -orange in the fall. All these native trees are found in Southlake. If you'd like to add other edible trees to your home site and would like a copy of Howard Garrett's recommendations, call KSB at 481-5581 (Ext. 759). Arbor Day and Special Recognition to KSB contributors Scott Martin & Eel McRoy were presented by KSB & Mayor Stacy. Pictured (left to right) Lisa —. Stokdyk, KSB President; Ed McRoy, former city employee; Mayor Rick Stacy; Scott Martin, former KSB President; Pam Muller, Councilwoman. O n$ n don ...- 3` to v _.n w K yJ o, 1.1 C Iit O _ F = N L g:i o Fr m ati `n .fit , °' C-'< Fm O ji r,� tt d. G i y NMI C O Irre 3 1 v.7� C 0 0 y m AID 0n iir _ r.., -2 2 ^ Pr cr-� R , 4n C A • n eD n d = 0 A= a 3 '< R R 9 G i} 'f` io y C< J1 19_ 1.3 m 7 n CD Us n r •n �� d Do c.a v0 _ o Vl 0 arC N,Oa S N po O Co, •ro 3 S a _ :O m = y c I� 3 _.?R , F.N ay _ S<. i.r < -'c (n = , 33 < m F7'0 3 •a? . < • z 0 y a� ?„0 A F 053° SI'f _n• x f9— A• d 1 -< G=- m 3 rt"•° 2,'.. n • D 3' 0 n. ;n^ • 3 ie -s o Z n _ ' R R R R = r' � � X � `< �3 n a n ao n n co n m n n n n - p=. _ „= = S . 0 ft� ^ -,OD n -'a 0 C.6 G N o ^ E1Nocma = oa-o9° = - " 4�'_ n a G.G C n n co G. Zid =• m -n n A O a.= S m go = n c orm = n a= CI I . nn % = a = 0 0 ? n• i= n:„ F ' . a 7 _ 00 oc y C. ��..yy oc 0- n V =.� oxoB= y . dosa. g Q. °= m = n d nNooa" �?x3 A x ,2,..d c io'm 3 1al�1 y _ < rR ^' C.4 5.p._. N n N H = .G C n =_ _ ^ n S N R v a F s� R <.d nnro, wO c3n 0 °: n y ..� '-3 r, E _ r n x 3 C S ° ° o f = cA ` s5• vf = n = ti S- : 0.C. / o d < nV i a' 3-G n Cy^ dc''S .* :454 X,n = _2•n 2., = C 7 G o C y v, G'' ✓ .ram•, 3-o =• ., G.c, G 2 O s3 3 = r4 =.=.n ran S a 7 a . y S a,J, 3 n cR A S• • G C a w �s � a, r, r, m n • A n-w = O O O n . • O p _ = S 3 '0• '' o CD -.0 c = y 01 a' ET. . „' - 30 • r. F k F s 0 2-^'�7 0' Sof 9, 0,n<, °i o 2. w :41.4 kin • y O tJ - - aaD8ao n • y- 'C qjO•' `/fl 0 B �i F, .e Y J - gFyxU3 '�+` rt. H o;oo m o F 0 c^D. m < 1 3 r' ; °' = a gao n � -a ,o n '1 O .- 4 O i 2 X 0 - C ki O 0 = 5• co 0 Op n O v, y > y > aO Fr. y ''C � '" o 1iIcA teC M /� ',, li, Fr rp c 7• O Ci7 0 G7 . O cD n cD CC c " ° = .» 3 °' v ccl * = fD ,y O 7' c V1 0 _. .» ? = -t --1 a CD O CD0 <t CIO O `< p- 0D ry y t O .�.) 'd O cr w e `` c0•' a CA ..I `<• ea ''V a 2, cD O "T 7 co B °° trir1 LI O C" ^O • to cn n. 0co . . CD /A "0 `r - — 0 CD CD 0 to -t - nti? c y AD • y b "c-5UO a `co Cz y1. o a o • a cnDOc��o -; cD r. t 0 = gin o .CD ;t!o d H `~'' "n•' D .1 - O A. c rrww "� A O O G. COv1 - 0 =' A—'. = cn0 '-< 7 0 G- 3 2 A' fD a 'ti p 7� o • ccooyo O 0 " A' wgOo � oa p: ° y Ao .I a. � �1 Vit Q: CD .d Vi ,-• 0 c CD 0 eD '+ A' y y n O D `e 'ti w g OC y^ �• vi Ll :n 2 • ° c'� dc � on * °• w ° s g w w o 000 a coi CO o- 0- w 0 0 `O sa _ b ii' a � on, oco < y ? y � O O a o w c ,oo ao °•e = r 3 ^L. ° o G.• ' S p. m 2, OLo yr w H .w, > = z V. E . CD = f `< O w Z F o = 72 O. C17 3 O — w 7 v, 0 n ., o 0 .tfc co COo 0 0 0 = A = 0 0 n �^ w D E 3 no * n0 0 0 `• co nno 1�■ 0 o B. w Ir 0 . C 3✓ w = o 0 7 7 7 v, 7 � a. o ^ � 7M w p n o 'o p'C ••''. Cr n y 3 3 0 AD - . ? oo . 00._. Elwo a0wcy0AI0.pao ' c ` ox 0. 00 Oti H 0. = y N "q = O 0 CO .i CC Q 113 b =• co .nn " d. n o� 0 ?. * w - .• C at- m �e 0� O 1, 0 ta w 7 0 G. 2 0 C c co w S o n c o C "� C C. co O A CCn.� ,e O. � crg •n5' O O O O .^i O. G - i� ,...a0o Oro n < cro 0 y CO� o C? c co «,. y C co Uo G C N w w 0 d� CA = • = cD " C406 . o o sob •ems Chi, �, a S CCD °n °' . coo cno �' 3 o " y - °C cn ^ cD cue ° D 0cl, ao ^ ?; O o o coo Co w w a. 0' ID C o u, qtb ,°�„ y ' coW R7 4-1 3• G coo w %; y G w = y co = �• O O 0' ; o. , n 1 CD y • • < o v, 'C C. ° 0 = �-O CD OE '� ii la i ;ri 0 _ s 0 I cD f=Dns C d ^Y A _ V o ..j do 0 i', lz,y 0 n .. (9 n 3v — � — cn a• _ cu ° � o g i.5. c p cw wo ^ a v o 0a . 00 0.vo c'O 7s . . ..< o ►n (p ~ co `G O. 8Qy S A •C O Er O S w ,. w 0 o w w ",,, y F• n; crcz �• ul XJ 0 ; Q. "f 0, Q. =... ._ a = • cD H o o• It. ! C n' C6, d n ru eD 'bd JUIH k ^n _' QJ II I r oc _ v_ r OQ •= m �• i r ` as o S .ram. I M $> : c` a S 2 La d a` lit • '� Pam. i 0 A y 1 n _• l 9�D O O s A � a= m D 0.70 s Fla yC� M _ ' ` S �_ dye/►yJ4IJ11�1v.....w/ - S ! �^ �° A �\ ' # ¢ yam cra 11 ti '7, A ,� s P► Q to .n �" gC. _ - j I am Isrl S g" A ... H Oi _ ' g - _ .e. r. /I Ip O v x s • al ^. " = d.F 43- fb O "q rn -. O m n >r _ G 2 9 C m r> gam,'' O Q "'► F 16 .e = 7 is -_;. t.1 . 4.. .. 'YEWS CLtPPLYG Source:c , Date: I i i LI Southlákèfestival's walk to girl, RRo v ByAmy quemore TbeDallasMornin or Effort to aid leukemia patient come out and see that community service, StaSOUTHI.AKE — A long "Walk forhowever big or small, is important," she Amy" benefiting 8-year-oldAmile "Walk kofor also intended to show support said. "We haven't even set a goal amount d like to raise. I know'Tricia will be held in conjunction with the city's therapy. Her medical expenses already and Ed [Stethat we nnnkoj would be so appreciative 40th anniversary celebration Saturday at have soared to more than S800,000,and the just to see a Bicentennial Park. family's insurance companygoodturnoutAmy."and all the good Amy was found to have leukemia 2 ing once the bill reaches million stopunds wisheshe event rwilll begin at1 a.m.Saturday, years ago and developed a brain aneurysm are also needed to pay for a wheelchair but walkers can start as late as 2 p.m.,Ms. ■ Southlake celebration continues. 4G ramp and lift at the Stefankos' home, de- Edgerton said. Volunteers will gladly ac- ductibles treatment for the dis- ductibles and other costs not covered by cept donations of any size on Saturday,but ease. undergoingm was removed ediinsurance. contributions are not required for partici- ease. The aneurysm m vedut a during Sue Edgerton of Southlake, who is help- pation in the walk. of surgery in left October,be littleas girls ing organize the Walk for Amy, said the At the conclusion of the walk, partici- of strokes severe that braino damage. event is meant to be as much a show of pants are encouraged to take Friendsr of the Stefanko o familycommunity support for Amy and her family city's anniversaryparth the —togeth- as it is a fund-raiser. celebration, which will er with a lot of strangers—have organized be happening all afternoon at the park. the walk to help pay for Amy's physical "It's very easy for us adults to write a "If you can only come out and walk 10 Y p Ys check, but we really want all the kids to Please see SOUTIEII,AKE on Page 4G. , i i 1 OX\eAr) t_ ' walk to benéf itgirl, 8 Southlake festival s throughand continue to Continued from Page 1G. ��the�she with such� strong will," said Mr. 1, minutes for Amy, that's great," she said. "It's just to progress fight 1 raise awareness,and we want to make this a communi- Stefanko."But I think she understands what she used ty event. You can come and participate, get to know to be like and wants to get back there.She is really a _your fellow man and get involved in something that is hero in that regard." happening right here in our own community." He said he hopes the Walk for Amy will serve as an Mr.Stefanko said his daughter has recently shown example of the good that can result when people band -:remarkable improvement, despite doctors' prognoses together to help a family in crisis. 4 F `t:tjiat she would never"walk,talk or be herself again" "Really, the core feeling of everybody involved After her strokes.Amy can already say a few words at a with the walk is to demonstrate what can be done,to h i time, read and do simple math problems, and she is help other people in need,not just Amy," a said."WS learning to stand and walk with support. If she is• so wonderful to see people growing spiritually,both feeling up to it,she will be present at the start of the individually helping ividuallyy andI a good ex as a ample.by o a contributingot good that'sd - walk on Saturday, he said. „ After being hospitalized for seven months, Amy in people benefit fund also has been established for was allowed to return home last week, but she still A special • undergoes seven hours of painful outpatient physical Amy at Texas drNational o Bank 9� Southlake,ak Texas therapy a day. "I'm not so sure I or anybody else I know could go 76092. NEWS CLtPP1NG Source: Date: 4:G Cheglatlast"+ imingNelug Thursday, May 1, 1997 --S Sporty about 40 Southlake stretching out birthday celebration with 2nd festival • By Joy Dickinson Park Saturday for the festival, ris, wife of City Council member • Staff Writer of The Dallas Morning News along with a fund-raisingwalk for David Harris;• Amy Martin, Keep SOUTHLAKE—During a birth- 8-year-old leukemia and stroke pa- Southlake Beautiful (and wife of day that most people would just as tient Amy Stefanko, and several council member Scott Martin); soon forget — the big 4-0 — the youth athletic events. Carolyn Sims, Arts Council of city of Southlake is determined to Parking will be available in Northeast Tarrant County; and make sure everyone remembers, the main Bicentennial lot, and Sandra Baber,Southlake Chamber with three parties over a yearlong free_shuttle service will start at 11 of Commerce. period. a.m. from nearby Carroll High Mrs. Payne, Historical Society The second of the celebratory School, 1501 W. Southlake Blvd. president,said her group will con- festivals will take place from Shuttles will continue running duct a raffle to raise money to noon to 7 p.m. Saturday at Bicen- through 8 p.m. restore the historic log cabin at tennial Park, Southlake Boule- Festival admission is free, as Southlake Boulevard and Carroll yard at White Chapel Boulevard. are most activities. Games, which Avenue. The cabin, which proba- The event, which will be are being sponsored by various bly was built by German immi- staged at the south end of the park clubs and organizations as fund- grants,dates back to the Civil War near the Adventure Alley play- raisers, will have a small fee. era. ground, will include entertain- The arts and crafts area will Items to be raffled include a went, arts and crafts, food and include toys,jewelry, child-safety map showing Tarrant County beverage vendors, games and products, windsocks, ceramics, from 1836 to 1856,another county children's activities. From 1 to 4 children's woodcrafts and person- map from 1895,and a flag that has p.m.,the skies above the park will alized items. Entertainment will flown over the state Capitol. M- ix aflutter with entries in the include a magician and clown fle tickets cost$1 each. city's annual kite festival. show at 12:30 p.m. and a concert The society also will display Planners say they've received by Lake Cities Brass from 3 to 5 several photos from the area's ear- enthusiastic help from residents, p.m. ly days when, Mrs. Payne said businesses and local clubs and or- Anyone with string and a kite with a chuckle,it was known sim- ganizations. "My phone is ringing can enter the kite festival,and the ply as "west of Grapevine. . .. We off the hook,"said Tracy Southers, city plans to give away about 1,000 weren't Southlake then; some of Southlake public information offi- kites at the event. Jewels of the these photos go back 50 years or cer. "Everyone's really pitching Sky, a professional kiting group, more." in. .. . We wanted to do it up will judge the contest, which will Ms. Southers said the festival right." have prizes for best homemade will cost about$6,000,all of which Southlake's official 40th birth- kite, best kite with a tail, best has come from donations and yen- day was Sept.29,1996,and a small- without a tail and other catego- dor fees. The event's main spon- • er-scale party was held then."But ries. sors,all of whom donated at least since we'll be 40 all year, we de- A volunteer committee assisted $500, are Kroger, Magic Mike's cided to extend the fun," Ms. Ms. Southers in planning the Texaco,Radio Shack,Rialto Devel- Southers explained. A final event event. Members were Mayor Rick opment, Southlake Chamber of. is planned in September. Stacy, honorary chairman; Elaine Commerce, Southlake Family' About 5,000 people are expec- Bell and Aloha Payne, Southlake Medicine and Texas National ted to converge on Bicentennial Historical Society; Candace Har- Bank. cowE0 08M n ' n-, - -Ab000a ri cc g o y a 4 m y m � m m m cr gd 8 - pm oob m :: �a.� pg PA- m p CD Q O v • �+ 8 a. Q m eft `... on co aye » 1 �.pW1 FP 0 . p' � 0 �e . ate � w °' 000 '" 0 Q v. °~-. n <D o fDolvm a"'s m N y : 6a 0A. "s_'. .. ' -m am y ,n o/ 0 p,0 0 p• G rA p cD p p ". Z '•' a) .-.. m y M r.. o�7u o �' m m p A .my :o �e cD m ' ° .1a. � � D A .y D ►1 ,- ' W ACisa pm ( v v Nam. .O N < mom met Q '+ o C apDa0 p cn r; p y (IQ a °, 0 IIMMOMIL C. a �~ p n ° gel a � °;� � O 0. m y �y nm a* vp .. mnp 0 'C+ � 0aptixo� . Oti p� m �„ o ,yp. A m O 0. a O 0 -. m = a m y .. °. fD a v' �' 0 p a Q g .. m C p N m m o O p M R o D .. m p� crm � 0 : � o. acD � a . . _, Cram w RM W o CD ° 0 0 m o .40 . y C g'm'� v.co y y .+. m a0.p G. 0 mom. spy a 0.4 „/ 0. , _ 1 p p m e m Q a o 0 ►y O .CD 4 08 n .. p m `° m n n a p p -w'� cD C m C •my m O N a m{7' C7'y .R.a I �y C `. �y h! . m , a .'. p g m p. r, . n ~-'m ra o. ° Cog p nv, m p- `y C " m . '°J c .6 .mt m co as m m p n 7C1 � cD ' r' C p cD C CICI ` r cxm o0 paqQ noaap = m tr ~j W wp wo m cn Ca0 o E� 1 `" El mcDy ,4 , 84p mpca Qco0. . „4 0 , a; m pt0 Cr i . m cr G• O Q. ° po_ `< ...yV V (p 0 C ,- Zr,,- ' 05mm '" -.1 ' m m -.4 m p0eyA mGA.. a tt a? m 0, 0m yom a ,+ O . On - g - vmmv ti -to - . CO a '-' f1 fD . O !D vi'.7 y QRO, y r.C "� C7' 1+ vvmomsm . 0 ,Nv m �� r: p � . f G 0 a -4- p ap eDpwO � oy .. �.pma �e' 8 "o' m y p'v 0 • .. O 0 (D p 0 p ... 1 N �, iiik a � iD0..0i' iPI8 g � °p0. 00 - O n fD yao. "� lD p. y zl, .. 0 _,, oo g p •l. C n`e n co t`, n o ~ Z - E 0. r� Q ao2 0 = O O 'd .y-. LI . .y P!.m. V/ I. V C7 p _ cD `.Z p p p' O pi '✓ vi fD A Ci A 1 r UmIP -13 '0 Er' — w 0 Q n g o: ..., \r. i 1 3• �o c • a3 n ^C 4.1 3 - an.►..r = I�14 y ' = 0 3 ry w s.„, Cam'•' n Y Y I. c. a w ro< D 'q F. H0 ,c _• n T3 rD o a.< L„ x a ,, irf mac S-ry, ='Cq _C GA _ J-� \.. � - • o ,Tm ° a' — 271 S :.�. \ iltilrid .� .� R ` o0 • o _ . - �yo crt Q" a � C _° a Can .c g. /o s ,• et. 0 ct. R.7 B C. , =0 " , ce. _al Cr) ••.c.• •' 3 et V =. 03x ' 'o ws� o 4 Z I v• , fD . w3 a �c V �• CI 3 E :3acg.o ° r'?c C� f �Sl w ^o co _ w rD < a f _ < Q Q A o E w ° �w w� a E o 9 �: F 3 a ^ ° a d % . w co .°^ fa o ro .j Sp 75- aa'o 3y •^cy �c S 1 ' v � roEo ° " ' :`� ay < co co � to ,.•� ao 4 E. c .-3° cnopa c C 3 "`* / as" _ CI c a c !� H H D• Q.►cSoy �cEnc�oaio � "� � < Oa : w /aCI :� ��/ tri 0 ° r. aF �� ° F� • .S _ . rAQS ..- Alt. , J s "ci =.... 0 0.—.. ,.... -. .7,Z • w co o r� Q� x 1 %' • 0 §.0 0 cP B of O 0 a 70 4 A pip O % w K. 0 .w•• 0 ty4.tony y O Pr a. A O • "CVO •. p' y ••,CH = C ry aH r � � AOy $ 0V, w ^ go . rp . Cg , ° aa°414 A 0 z CD � 7 s ' 0. CD CD � E. .. ol• o o � co 0) _ t raeq..AD � ° � , 0 <w0a C< 0a(o Cr.. 0 ....So yO a •-• y ,a. xao x d' O x � = xo gra0 �' v w 0` ke ...=: c " e a g � c< CD < CD = a: gay °° ' p. A 2 T 3, A. C. n -, O y 0 0 w 0 v, At , y w w _S r. w a 0 0 G '0 gli 0 w CT ° w �"1 . `e rl .,, co v, G w co fl- =+ <1, 0. wwy0w ° tea- :: 'LsQ ��j e� w w H•R y 0 10 Cr fa. 1, rn 0 S = 0.. .00 G = �17 6 = 0 Rom. O •... y y �, a ca M O n A y D, w _ 0. O Za o 0Z D a n o, A ao' A°(� n y k, Q. a = +' d.(D 7d y.o cD a 0' fD y 6/ F o _ "' 0 cop y w p y xy � -t B -2 5 ap a9CDaa le: C 01 w w Al 0 = w .".• w 0 0- a "+ a: gO`< 0 0 ►t 0 7P ►, • 0' t 0 w fD P., Ali a . a`< CD (D '< 0 CD `< .. v, •ti H 0 ,•, o h ^ =- - CCD a. � 0 a �b A 4 " 0 ,z, - p o 0 (D OM ... E. p (D 0� w y 0 y 0 0- 0 p go .d y ., wCCAD 0 'D 0. 0 C. O o C O O O 0 0. 0 ° y w c: w y CDD ° o faD 0.°r y cED .. c , 0,. -i • a: 6, = ., (D C7 nas •, a cu •N .' •CDD w 3 co w 0. •s (D `.3°° x � G w a ~ H. g CD 0 aw (D O cif 0 O. w x ? .". . _ oo fD o �' (gyp Ft; ? go O O A) 0- 0' w Ai 1. cl. . YEWS CLIPPING Source: S ___... 11kva .00 Date: !� '' w►� 1 , 1 r YJ' •edgirl' once sa..p BY DOMIlVGO RAMIREZ JR. ing with DiMatteo via the Inter,- r Star-Telegram Staff Writer Charles E. net, Southlake Detective Sgt.'. i SOUTHLAKE—The Internet Todd of Charles Ward said. i relationship between a Southlake Southlake Todd has been charged with j man and an 11-year-old Califor- ,�" is charged possession and distribution of nia girl progressed quickly,policechild pornography. He was free, said yesterday. in an Inter- yesterday after posting $20,000 During their first online visit net child bail shortl after his arrest. last week, the man asked her ify y4.. porn case. cials confiscated the man's conq she liked older guys and if she puter. wanted to play an adult Truth or "He saw my [fictitious] name' Dare game,officials said. The "girl" turned out to be on the Internet and in no time he.> Within hours,the man had sent Detective Mike DiMatteo of the was sending me messages," said; , her adult obscenity, then child San Bernardino County Sheriff's DiMatteo, a detective with the pornography and later told her Department in California. crimes against children division that he wanted to meet her during DiMatteo alerted Southlake of the San Bernardino County-: a business trip to California, authorities, who arrested Charles sheriff's office. police said. E. Todd, 49, on Saturday at his "Restrictions can be placed on • The meeting never occurred. home while he was communicat- (More on INTERNET on Page 15), ..--- -- — — -- ............unm anutnn • t I 1 E , Z _ • commercial child pornography, ways for pedophiles to reach Internet that were confiscated from Todd's them." home in the 1200 biock of Scenic There is no law to prevent sus Drive. pects from using an online service' From Page IA' Todd, a plant engineer for a Ri- that they paid for,said Gary Gregg," kids who get on the Internet where chardson computer company, has director of police services with the, they can't get to some adult.chat no criminal history, Southlake De- Southlake Department of Public rooms," DiMatteo said. "But partment of Public Safety authori- Safety. :adults have access to most of the ties said. "We can just monitor the situa could not n,"Gregg ,P*Ol ce room 'the suspect to a to comment yesterday,leis reached living lioWad saidshe suggests that ear ,Police linkedp outhlake home after he gave a with his adult son,his daughter-in- ents look at computer screens,„ . elephone number to DiMatteo, law and their children,police said. check conversations when their outhlake authorities said. "We still do not believe any local children are using the Internet.* 4 "Initially,the suspect told the of- children were victims, but the in- Even as apart-time Internet cop, ficer that he had to be careful and vestigation is continuing," Ward DiMatteo sees dozens of cases in-' ;had to make sure he wasn't talking said. volving pedophiles from all over• ; to a cop," Ward said. "The officer The Internet has become a prime the world,he said. 'simply played the role that con- source for pedophiles looking for "If I were full time,I could make vinced the suspect that he was talk- 'victims,detectives said. at least one case per week for a ding to an 11-year-old girl." "It's a dangerous place to ven- year," DiMatteo said. "The acces- Yesterday, Southlake detectives ture," Ward said. "Parents should, siblity of child pornography is lrontinued to sort through about 40 have some restrictions for their kids much greater now, thanks to corn loppy disks,many of which contain on the Internet, but there are still puters." IA i SEWS ci..... ,:ppENG ur c e: - ,., _ - 91 , . IDate: ....) H qh. 6 ,.... IA A•kik So Photo by Ryan S.Otto - .V.-...-4.....---' ---.----,----' --- . --... ,__,,_- t ' 51 ' ,4 - ; I — ,-,77ts,17 44 I .4. : -,-- !°: '''''' ''''''',i .'•4 ,... ., • l , , - 7. , .f' 1 • l 241;44 . ,..'"',i.-... • •--, , ... _ . ' . lir*,;:e-It ._. -'-:%7 — ,..;,:::.,i‘?:, ..r;1;;;5,`,, ,.., I .":73,..' ., -,*117''',21:, ' N''•''''''' '-'11 '-',...; •. . '.'7,, f., ' ''.,., ' : ' 2 '',-,*•,f; '&‘;''.-''''' ''' .7_ =,.t.:44 •, ' I I • ' ' i ' lg '142' ; '' `t( t''''L.t'''',.• ).<7:' • 1 ! ' - Ci'- It,' '' \ 't '1,,,...',,::'''':''',V;;:\ _ -,, .'', ' ti,Trf' "11' ,,',..';';'41..tg.'fi;':::-.::,.. M . ?•.:'-- .:,,,, , ,..„;;;,,st ;.;,..1', ..i.•;:', *,.... :: ''::' :';: 1''''O*, . :;'0, ',::::.)* , 1 , f;ripi„.—c., ,,.,,17,1.0,0:-: '''.,t,_-.-::,-i,,,;-,,,i ',, , ;,. ',•- ''. -,,,-,1 f n:,-..-04;i - 7- ---,,,.---,',i - ' 1 ,....,:ii':;„',..::,'T..,1, 0,7', ,,.-,.• ,'," :,:::k,A(7t*. i Ili" ?..:62v.,-'4,5',.-,:,ITT, I t, .--, .:-....,i,,,°V4'''7-..,," „,"...,:e•A'%:,, A .., ', , ,,,_ . 0.,, -.1/4:,4t,;..,i,,,,,AT , , :,;.„,,,,.;.7; ',:;...i'Z.,;.Ar'••1;-:,.- . . -,--- c...,,...:,......w...„, , ,T.1..1.--- ,.,..., • i :i.,-----"•'-i'<i'iOt',!':;.'di.,-,?.:'-'4•0:0;v:',' ,i:),i'' ' • c•.,.-'-:-.• , „ ..,,?_ 1 f-- -,-: • l• k .0., - --,......,..,..._. ...,,, ,. .... ..„. .... ' i Vgf''''' ' '..':..,'4•-•," 1,..,,t';`,%. 0"'1 ;,, '.-.,•c,:'''',!,,IS:':',..r:.,. „„„.':::;.':':':'„•••••4%* ......,?...t.,-7.--,..,„ „, •'' 'A •,;',,-,°.„1:-, ':,,•;' ;,ily '',- :, -,•.€.4," , I, -- ::. • , . : t,,,,,,.,:-, ,'•.,•1-?.. ,.4.--,' Grapevine: 1 to his cousin. Ar4-9-7'm'''.. • - trophy t. „.„.•..- Champions friendly sports wager. ...„,., . that was part of a Rick Stacy dinner s ... thiake Mayor an at a steak and be meal SM°auyor William Tate, a presented the "Steak C mayors line of state football c ,.. - = hani..,, . '4, 1 to welch on long Tate said at Tuesdayo,.., . Football Stacy brings bet was going pions," _ ,....,..Grape;.:.., .., by Ryan S. Otto . cous- night's meeting°I tu city coun- last fall, the two vine and Southlake ____,, ,, er Southlake Mayor Early William . and staffs. .,..-,-„., ,,, ....1 • Mayor and GrapevineRick Stacy the bet,"Tate said. cils Tuesday resolved. settled the score had yet to be Tate has a StacY's town night. ins revived that "I know an argument that , "I had about decided .... • PIN till, A When you hear the word spin in the same sentence with any thing to do with government you automatically think, oh no, what do they really mean? Well, the City of Southlake has taken that prevalent concept and put their own kind of spin on it. City leaders saw the need to include all citizens in the decision making process, giving them expanded opportunities for meaningful participation in community affairs. Progress Report beneficial and over 30% said neighborhood friendly corn- they participate in the program. mercial developments that are COIAt a time when being Since its inception showing up all over the city. C evasive and non-committal SPIN has conducted over 135 This process can often .,, might possibly be the safest neighborhood meetings to be long and tedious but in the A avenue to take for a city which over 2,800 citizens have end it results in a better , government the City of attended. Topics ranging from Southlake for everyon can one. doubt Southlake has committed itself development issues to to a course of action that is just infrastructure construction have that the people of Southlake are the opposite. They disseminate been reviewed in the ongoing concerned about the future of as much information about what effort to keep residents apprised their city and city leaders . e the issues are affecting the city of what is or is going to happen recognize r ng them he an aoritanceoiof to as many residents as possible around them. as often as necessary. To the But Southlake i3 also a in shaping the plans for the leaders in some cities this may city that is experiencing major future.Planning for Southlake's r sound like an invitation to growth, both residential and growth is a challenge city I• disaster but in Southlake it is commercial. And through SPIN leaders face every day. And lip. the foundation on which the the city involves the they fully understand that city's future is built. neighborhoods to help assure maintaining the delicate balance The cornerstone of the that the charm and atmosphere between the needed commercial . information network is the that brought so many of them to developments and the rural ,: SPIN program. SPIN is an this area is maintained to the makes all town Southlake ambiancesuch that acronymacronym for Southlake fullest extent possible. Program for the Involvement One example of the desirable place to live is crucial 1�I of Neighborhoods, a volunteer effectiveness of SPIN would be to everyone SPIN program has d organization made up entirely the revision of the Masterto of citizens. It was created in Thoroughfare Plan which went the city divided into sixteen •to 1993 to facilitate corn- through 21 public meetings and districts, or neighborhoods. • munication between neighbor- workshops prior to its Each neighborhood has a SPIN hoods and city government, acceptance.Another is the Open representative, who sits on the • including elected officials, Space Master Plan . which SPIN Standing Committee appointed boards and underwent 17 public hearings. which meets quarterly with the commissions and employees. Commercial developers City Council to discuss current whent 1 The program has been are also encouraged to meet issues, andto well received by residents as with SPIN groups to discuss information is first given. In evidenced by the results of the their plans prior to seeking some of the h mo eodre desnsely 1996 Citizen Satisfaction approval from the city. More populated g Survey. This survey indicated than one proposed development representatives have established that 84%of Southlake residents has been withdrawn or changed a network of liaisons to better are familiar with SPIN, an due to citizen input in one of facilitate the distribution of increase of 13% from 1995. these meetings. SPIN influence information to their entire 83%of those responding to the can be seen in the very high or partssee"SPIN"f. SPIN was page 2 survey said that SPIN was quality residential and 01 11 r available at both city offices, from paged public works office, water utilities counter, and the parks building. designed to be an autonomous The city decided to program with representatives abandon the practice of mailing determining their own priorities notices to residents due to and charting their own course. inefficiencies in the process. One of the biggest Mailing to an entire advantages of SPIN is that in neighborhood was often many cases residents can make wasteful when the issue only their views known to their SPIN affected a small portion of that representative at a time neighborhood, bulk mail was convenient to them. The not always dependable, there representative can then attend was only a three percent the appropriate city meeting and response to mailings and as the report the views to city city grows mailings would officials, thereby eliminating become increasingly expensive the need for the residents to and time consuming. spend hours sitting through Developers may, at their meetings. expense,use a mailing to notify Although SPIN has citizens of an upcoming been an integral part of the meeting. The current cost of a development process in city wide mailing is over$1000. Southlake it is a successful There is no better way venue in other areas as well, to stay abreast of the issues Groups have sponsored political concerning your neighborhood candidate forums and voter than using the SPIN information registration drives to better network. It's there for your educate the population about benefit,take advantage of it. city and school elections. SPIN was also involved in the successful campaign seeking state funding for a major To contact a SPIN _ highway project. representative's voice mail SPIN holds two call 481-5581+ext, categories of meetings for the citizenship. One is the Nona Whitehead - SPIN Neighborhood Meeting, which Coordinator for the City of covers local issues specific to a Southlake ext.834. given area, the other is a City Wide Meeting, which covers David Baltimore-Chairman of issues affecting all citizens, the SPIN Standing Committee directly or indirectly. ext.892. The methods the city uses to notify homeowners of SPIN#1-Cara White x881 upcoming SPIN meetings SPIN#2-Martin Schelling x882 include: SPIN#3-Joseph Mast x883 A monthly column in SPIN#4-Janet Murphy x884 SPIN#5-Jan Francis x885 the Southlake In Review. SPIN#6-Tom Ward-x886 Cable Television SPIN#7-Darrell Faglie x887 channel 25. SPIN#8-Pattie Minder x888 Web Page at SPIN#9-Laura Miklosko x889 www.ci.southlake.tx.us SPIN#10-Al Morin x890 Readerboard Sign at SPIN# II-Roger Hutton x89I Bicentennial Park. SPIN# 12-David Baltimore x892 SPIN rep phone lines SPIN#13-1im Goggin x893 with dedicated extensions and SPIN#14-Doug McKelvey x 894 voice mail. SPIN# 15-Wayne&June Haney Weekly sidebar in the x895 SPIN# 16-John&Linda Wilder Southlake Progress. x896 A dedicated conversant SPIN Youth Delegate- phone line at the city office. Katie Holzgraefe x 897 NEWS CLIPPING Source: t l J - Date: 2 91 i I . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Saturday, May 3 Noon 7 p.m. Bicentennial Kite Festival - Park 1 :00 - 4:00 p.m. Local entertainment performing ••' •• �•• on stage all day • . �1▪ : ▪ I:'� .,• Arts & crafts booths C lebtall°n 4. ► Food and 0:: 6 ti ofA beverage vendors !r' S0� Games .4• 1 4:4.4,0 Activities for children . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • � I 1 , i YEWS CL1PPLYG Source: ( iJ✓ % Date Child pornography ch arges es filed News and Times rested a 49-year-old white male, determine if there are any addi- t On Thursday, April 24, the Charles Ernest Todd. tional criminal offenses and to de- Southlake Department of Public At the time of the arrest, the in- Safety received information from dividual was engaged in an "on- tact ne the m nexte l of internet cons tact and criminal activity in this the San Bernadino, Calif., line" chat with a police official case. Although there is no evi- Sheriff's office regarding an inves- from California posing as a minor dence at this time to support any tigation into the distribution of child. Officers seized the specific child abuse cases, Texas child pornography via the internet. individual's computer and related Child Protective Services has been While monitoring the internet, diskettes, and discovered suffi- contacted to assist in the on-going Sheriff's officials in San cient evidence to charge him with investigation to check for any such Bernadino discovered an indi- felony possession and distribution possibility or related child abuse vidual distributing child pornog- of child pornography. Charges of cases. raphy. Detectives were able to possession and distribution of The Southlake Department of track the person to an address in child pornography have been filed Public Safety extends their appre- Southlake. with the Tarrant County District ciation to the San Bernadino On Saturday, April 26, the Attorney's office. Sheriff's Department personnel Southlake Department of Public Todd is an employee of a corn- for their efforts and assistance in 1 Safety executed a search and ar- puter company in Richardson. this case. rest warrant in the 1200 block of Todd has been released on$10,000 Because of the on-going inves- 1 Scenic Drive in Southlake for evi- bond for each of the two charges. tigation, limited information will dence in the case. Detectives ar- The investigation continues to (see "Charges,"page 2) Charges from page 1 be available. Contact Malcolm Jackson,administrative coordina- I tor,PIO,Southlake Department of Public Safety, at 481-5581, Ext. ' 726. 1 I 1 NEWS CLIPPG`iG ��kJYUL — " Source t.JL n��%�}(� JO Date: • gSatin Humble Pie Southlake Mayor Rick Stacy made a bet with his cousin Mayor William Tate of Grapevine over last year's Carroll/Grapevine football game. The winner would eat steak while the loser ate beans. Well, Mayor Stacy and entire Southlake City Council, along with a number of city employees humbly dined on red beans whip the Grapevine City Council enjoyed their prime steaks provided by Mayor Stacy. m I may` li -:..-, .:4**.- ifilatilit '"i.F.:::. $ of *2 iii 8. y.b sip r ✓ ,. II 11 s p 1 , :S. r �a 'a s s "'4k� ili s ohs s�v, ... . .. . z.:d • The humble but proud Mayor of Southlake Rick Stacy and his wife Diane prepare to eat their red beans and cornbread. j 1 g cn 00 SPIN SPINE `° News \• ip ., a Public Works Update - On May 6 a bid proposal for a For more information about sanitary sewer improvement Southlake,surf the net at: will go before Council for www.ei.southlake.tx.us consideration. It is a six inch line along N. Peytonville that SPIN Neighborhood#16-Will will extend an estimated 300 meet May 13 at 7:00 PM in the feet east from Myers Meadow White Chapel room at to the east of Ten Bar Trail. y Bicentennial Park to hear Parks • Miron Addition sanitary sewer 0 Director Kim Lenoir talk about construction will be advertised "' the the park to be built near for bids this Sunday. . Florence Elementary School. • On May 6 a request for C" • authorization to advertise on a Conversant Phone System - water improvement will go tido To hear the latest information, before Council. It is a 12 inch 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, water line that will extend an, just dial the city number, 481- estimated 5,000 feet from .W. 5581. After the familiar Dove to Kirkwood Dr. greeting you will be offered • Construction of the new l miw menu selections starting with ground storage tank on W. the number (1) for a list of city Southlake blvd. is progressing a meetings. The menu tree will very well. Completion is ,` ' direct you to specific scheduled for July 4, 1997, 1 information such as how to weather permitting. register for recreation programs, ' facility reservations, and DPS Bike Patrol - Officers C closings due to inclement Richard Hollis, Jeff Powell, A , weather. Within the larger Shawn Fannin and Vann departments such as Public Wakefield have completed theirCY Works, you will be able to get training and you will see them 1 to specific divisions such as working special So e events ake likethi engineering, water, code Celebration s enforcement, inspection and Saturday,May administration. This new - system should make it easier for SPIN Neighborhood #1 residents to get directly to the addedsfivetive Cara l'aisons for SP1A1ite h# as information they are seeking. SPIN information will be found to help acle the work load. contact Cara at under the number (1) for Residents can meetings and also under number 4 formafion.x881 for city , (9)for Administrative Offices. ►n NEWS CLIPPING Source: The Dallas Morning News Date: May 8, 1997 I Southlake council c 1 OKs Timarron tract zoning By Toy Dickinson pockets of residential development. Stall''rigor of The Dallas Morning News Timarron officials brought a SOUTHLAKE — One down, two slightly revised concept plan before to go. council members Tuesday,incorpo- After nearly eight months of rating changes the council had re- wrangling and fine-tuning, Tract I quested at the first reading of the of the 531-acre Westerra Timarron zoning request. development, north of State High- As part of the compromise agree- way 114, received unanimous zon- ment,Timarron agreed to abide by any future development ordinances ing approval this week at a City Council meeting. that would apply to the land,includ- The 58-acre Tract I,at the south- ing those regarding tree preserva- east corner of Dove Road and 114, tion or limiting four-story buildings has been the least controversial of to a maximum height of 60 feet. the three tracts.It is in a less-popu- Five- or six-story buildings would spe- lated area of the city and has fewer be allowed on the tract only by homes surrounding it than the oth- cial-use permit. er two, much larger tracts further Council member Gary Fawks east on 114. said he was still concerned. about Most of the three-tract project the lack of designated open space . will be commercial, with limited Please see FIRST on Page 6G. •First tract of development gains approval Continued from Page 1G. with regard to future ordinances. As a concession to the on the tract, but Dennis Jerke, a home- owners,council members asked for ; Several residents spoke in oppo- a 300-foot setback along the tract's spokesman for the project, said the sition to Tract II, specifically about Carroll perimeter. Depending on required buffer yards already take the proximity of potential commer- what type of development eventual- up 7 percent of the property, and cial users directly opposite their ly goes in,the setback could be less- that substantial landscape areas al- homes along Carroll Avenue. ened during the site-plan phase. ' so will provide green space. On first reading, the zoning re- "On a 58-acre tract,we do need to "I'll be looking at a bunch of cars quest passed unanimously. Timar- have some land leftover for devel- or buildings right out my front ron will bring a final concept plan opment," Mr. Jerke said, drawing door,"said Chris Ensenberger,who for Tract II before the council on chuckles from the audience. lives on Carroll. May 20 for a second reading,which Next on the agenda was the first also will include the official public reading for Tract II,the largest and However,he added:"A corporate hearing on the request. most hotly debated of the three. campus sounds fine for that land, Tract II, which encompasses 271.9 but without a site plan,we can't tell acres,is east of North White Chapel how intrusive it's going to be. . .. Boulevard and west of North Car- Giving them everything they want roll Avenue. right now, without any site plan, Council members asked for just doesn't seem like a prudent changes similar to those in Tract I course of action." ndul i . S� CA O � fD Fs, cm O d Oo • xi '!7 >y �• �'' aOfs n O O .-1, S 7 �.'C7 y A 0 ' 7SID f~D O N = y = umn °ra. c?D C ,o CD ° CD f ^ c am . , -t N 5 0 0-t w. o �y � �le r, � __ O CD Cr O CD 0 .10 O cD O. w• CD co• a y w y Ct9 3 Z I 3 = C 3 v '0 A _Oo A A, *CD ca CD C y ' o I O UiI151)PCIIIi CD y < A i a = C e O A << vs av, CD tMl ao `O O ,A-, . - <' .a n0. 00ro y A) ^7 v- m o ao-00• TG7c n d o m •�, . o, • = . :SDo in o -+ CO fD C Q„ N _n`< a 7 •. 0 7 7 y fD _ O l •D a CD CD •`n y d 'C A• *• ^ ? sv N Q' _7 y .", v) Al •+ ? CD ' _ .7" fD 0 O F., 0 `< O C ? CD p: "0 CD A O ... .. rn A CD 10 H• Pq - , 0. CD 0 .° Ga < � .o -+ LID CD y DC o 0 cc) S °= ^ c .0 .1 ty/ . CD 0 o w -., CD :.n a ,� . 'e c. -1 10 y DA ?'�e Sim a, w e-) ° ? y A 3 DC N ° CA a c, v, O 'C1CD S fp O ?`< .^•, C 0 •5• co c X f co `o y ' fD CJ ro co CD a.< :'• a '� N n . 2 S °' ° CDT 000. o n 0 i .rx�' � y O _ F. ay .fro CD c fD C73 fD LHflflJ 0. pi tU gill O0w w .. !D -iC9. * ca. o' w & v^ � ^. 3 2. CD fn CT' S• •a)I O C '< o CD -o . iD O: . y• y• A• ,.,:3 = COi • a�• C y w ? cD co '..Cr° A, O 0. cra , 0^ CD Q • ? O y ►+ v C CD C n -+ = G 0.-O °o " .a W y C Say C. rm' c5 3 w 2 O G. v 0 -At ° 0 N C ...1 c CD O a A= O ° " o c,„ o y Iv „• C _ Pij00 ao < A g ^• c• y n •-n Sfa. iD7. CA CT•O a -, n o o a = = 7� 7 A CD A .O * ' Ir =n a O CD CD ^ fD .0 CD O^ ? O� y CD C "cr co y A, y. ,..• c O '� < < 0 O ^ ^ A .`< 0 ? A — CD '~ -� ? C a — -- Fs a CDD `< �T 00A fD O 4, O0. >vcp CD 10 `< a .^7• 0 CD .I "" COC fD O CI ill 9 D•O A C 0 y �. 0 C A, C y y C 0 ,0,,, O ,D ~ ° ^ fD - m O O p -,• D v, ? CD CD C w 'CS O < Iv '+ = •• vi' :- i o0 3 ? , , a co . a a co n., , ZA . I � .. co A 3 N ? ? `0" ? * "0 y. Cl. 'C y Ado .t v, .-. .ti -I y O O AA, -• G m A C.oq "i 0 CD CD C O A ^ n cr O ° O C 0 c . �,• - 0 c, ,. -uoo• ? a << ?,� = aco o •f, 8 CD ° a � °- • ° 0- . `4 3 . c0 . C ? 7,' °- - "_8. - <°— g y � °' S'oo n 0 0 0�• C Z• - C ; A, A, 0 co?°(5'' A CDDCD 'n2, 'il <A '' ? y17 0a � cf< = 2Y y A•� m m cD c o y S c<D v• .... . CD m -I y w - C7 po S * a: fD 0 O / k CP ,•y A, y 0� O 0 ? CD `- .•i vi 0" y 7 of°, co fD AA, A �. o 0 o o aa .A, �. � co a � �• � vo . CD O A ° O• "17 a fD f9 A ...CD ''', y ,y y ,.„, CD O v' •CD + ° ^^ O 3 CD.":. CCo g ° A "CS oCD" ay .:; �. y ^. AA, 1:0S , o An, -I -+ .ofDfD � A- fDo °. iD 3 ° cD ? YEWS CLEPPC(G Source: Date: — — 1 I . . Fluid s ill shutspart of c p emend -firml , • BY BETSY BLANEY Rice said the fluid was a biode- shed,Jackson said.— . Star-Telegram Staff Writer gradable soap that the company "That's still part of the inestiga SOUTHLAKE — Federal and uses on the trucks. The company tion, but it's probably been for an state environmental officials tern- only uses diesel fuel to fill the extended period of time,"he said. ' porarily closed a portion of a ce- trucks'fuel tanks,he said.About 20 Officials with the federal Envi- ment company yesterday after a trucks a day are filled with cement ronmental on Agency and "significant" amount of what they at the company,Rice said. the Texas Natural Resource Con- suspect is diesel fuel was discovered The area of the company that sef;vation Commission are working iitearby,officials said. ; was closed includes the rinse tank, with Southlake to determine the _ The fluid traveled along the Jackson said. It will reopen after extent of the contamination and ; Mo ind for about 500 yards before' the investigation is completed, how it should be cleaned up,Jack- owing:into a watershed area and � probably in a couple of days, he son said. tilling several trees,Southlake De- said. artment of Public Safety spokes- t If Pumpco is found to have x an Malcolm Jackson said. Samples of the fluid have been p sent to a laboratoryfor evaluation, dumped fuel, the company could Pumpco Co. is believed to have Jackson said. face criminal charges and fines. ' ted the fluid to keep cement from "But it does have the smell and cking on its trucks' pumping ap- aroma of diesel,"he said. • ra ,Jackson said. The fluid was discovered about There is no immediate danger to 4:45 p.m. Wednesday after police king water,Jackson said. received a call from a neighbor who �rTheconcern that we have is noticed a strange smell, Jackson page into the water table," he said.The man has a pond about 20 . "bald' feet from the fence that separates 1 ,.. Company officials said yesterday the two properties,Jackson said. fat the fluid was not diesel fuel. - j Vsgo one has proven that,"said Jeff As of late yesterday, it had not fce, district manager at Pumpco, been determined how long the fluid 786 Kimball Ave. had been flowing into the water- cn SPIN� . .� SPINE News Public Works Update - On May 6 a bid proposal for a For more information about sanitary sewer improvement Southlake,surf the net at: will go before Council for www.ci.southlake.tx.us consideration. It is a six inch line along N. Peytonville that SPIN Neighborhood#16-Will will extend an estimated 300 meet May 13 at 7:00 PM in the feet east from Myers Meadow White Chapel room at to the east of Ten Bar Trail. y Bicentennial Park to hear Parks • Miron Addition sanitary sewer Director Kim Lenoir talk about construction will be advertised the the park to be built near for bids this Sunday. Florence Elementary School. • On May 6 a request for • authorization to advertise on a Conversant Phone System - water improvement will go To hear the latest information, before Council. It is a 12 incli 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, water line that will extend an; just dial the city number, 481- estimated 5,000 feet from W, 5581. After the familiar Dove to Kirkwood Dr. greeting you will be offered • Construction of the new menu selections starting with ground storage tank on W. the number (1) for a list of city Southlake blvd. is progressing meetings. The menu tree will very well. Completion is direct you to specific scheduled for July 4, 1997, information such as how to weather permitting. register for recreation programs, facility reservations, and DPS Bike Patrol - Officers closings due to inclement Richard Hollis, Jeff Powell, , weather. Within the larger Shawn Fannin and Vann • departments such as Public Wakefield have completed their Works, you will be able to get training and you will see them to specific divisions such as working special events like engineering, water, code Celebration Southlake this enforcement, inspection and Saturday,May 3. administration. This new system should make it easier for SPIN Neighborhood #1 -1 —� residents to get directly to the Representative Cara White has information they are seeking. added five liaisons for SPIN #1 SPIN information will be found to help handle the work load. under the number (1) for Residents can contact Cara at meetings and also under number 481-5581 x881 for city (9)for Administrative Offices. information. :Pj A yrii 0 m CAN =. _ CA Cro Hd° .. O t= 3 e►s 0 V. W n O T Tom- r. j vi <' -2. Ae 5 i (D O W m' • ` _ "Ls cr IMO CCD y O� .0-►, IA .• = CCD a O 7 ." :" G. 0 0 w D G. .� lohl uqP� (D --r� O _ cc) 0 -I C 0. co O .� .O. 10 �a C < . H A .�—i_ m A. �. w co E. Ica. a co -n 0 E. 0 • 0 § _= c co. i - A F " ett0 o 0 .A► O et' (D N? MIO A ; = hiD00Q' Aa 5- = o(D CD w CS O. (D (D = 0 O r.4 -s = fn . .. vl 41<< (D C. G• P.0• o N (D !9 Urn 0 S.' > C.4- " • tv pri _ \f O 0 H 0 0 3 �/` .A. g A H A .A. s 0 CD 0 TO A, cf. cr 'n O 5 z ~ < .N°► A. .C°. H G. _ .4, A CD IT � lD 9. ..{) V " y= co A 0r. N Q 0 in in A . . OQ eo rol 0 0 0 0 = 0 R.I. '' Oq �. 0 � _ _ _ • CL � rn . 0 9 5 cD 's I to O A = A y CD ne) ce - 7�k' (0D - N UQ fD r' .0 A 0.OQ in =�' I) CD CCAA O1 Pr C C A. 0 ,-0, 57, = A (D iA �' r..a q O O o ft 0 No �' A W. pp n 0 Qto 0 $ 2 sr Y�i I. a. CC' Ow. A !. (I) 'O in '► A 8 7 (D r YEWS CLEPPENG • Date: • 3 1997 ti Saturday, May 3, 1997 alla,3 orningXeluw 3 NF Southlake furniture stor - i .... s movig Gran to vine � -. . ,_ . By joy Dickinson restaurant near Joe's Crab Shack Staff Writer o/The Dallas Morning News will be substantially larger than the: SOUTHLAKE — After nearly a current store,which covers 3 acres, decade at its Southlake location, Mr. Stacy said. r main operations for Stacy Furni- "Guaranteed, this'll be the lal g; I ture will move to Grapevine within est furniture store between the' the next year,owner Rick Stacy said Gulf of Mexico and the Great Friday. Lakes," he said with a chuckle. He- "We expect to keep something added that,from its hilltop location, here in Southlake," said Mr. Stacy, "We hope you'll be able to see:it who is mayor of Southlake,"but we from Abilene."The land is adjacent' really haven't determined the ex- to Dallas/Fort Worth Internationil tent yet." Airport. ;t- After about three years of negoti- Tommy Hardy, Grapevine dirge.-; ations,the contract for a 7-acre plot tor of development services,said hie. fronting Main Street in Grapevine was unsure of the potential econoi was closed in January. Ground- is impact. ' ` breaking for the new facility proba- "I haven't seen his sales tax fig-- bly will take place this summer or ures,so I can't really say in terms of fall,Mr.Stacy said. dollars,"Mr. Hardy said. His retail furniture business has "But this will absolutely .be:a been a fixture at 280 Commerce St. good addition to Grapevine. Were at Southlake Boulevard since 1989. thrilled to have it" He had operated a wholesale furni- Mr.Stacy said he expects no titre company at various Grapevine mosity from Southlake regard 4 and Southlake locations since 1979. the move,especially since some ice' The Stacy family has roots in idents said last year they thoughrrt both cities extending to before the was inappropriate for a mayor-tb' - I turn of the century, said Mr.Stacy, own a business in the town. , - who grew up in Grapevine. He be- "I totally disagree on that,"-he' came mayor of Southlake in June said. "I think you have a double' 1996. interest then. But, hey, some jSt• The new store,which will perch those people may be real hops. on a hill above the Olive Garden about this." -v i 1 I NEWS CL.IPPGYG Source: / �.►, 1 / ` \ lkv, .V Date: Fort Worth ropes Circle before others Roanoke,Southlake and Trophy Club officials say they are interested in the ranch apd any other disannexed Westlake land. • BY JACK Z.SMITH Star-Telegram Staff writer Ross Perot Jr.'s 2,600-acre Cir- cle T Ranch was swiftly lassoed into Fort Worth jurisdiction yes- terday, setting the stage for what could become a $3 billion com- mercial and residential develop- ment. In an emergency morning meeting less than 15 hours after the property was disannexed from Westlake, the Fort Worth City Council voted, 9-0, to place the property, just east of Perot's Alliance Airport project, in Fort Worth's extraterritorial jurisdic- tion—a first step toward likely future annexation. Westlake's aldermen disannexed the property and some of their own land after a bitter dispute that pitted Perot against Mayor Scott Bradley and • tore apart the town. Fort Worth Mayor Kenneth Barr said the Circle T project, which would include homes, a regional shopping mall, golf courses and offices, could become"the largest nonindustrial e)(1 development ever in Tarrant County." Officials in greater Northeast Tarrant County, saying they have long recognized the value of the Circle T, did not back off the chance that the land could still be part of their own towns — including Westlake officials. After a record turnout in yes- terday's elections, Westlake resi- (Mnrr nn RANCH on Pa.•n'071 A I e a O �rIG L O 3 3 O • r'u lc. 5.S n R v) S X G 7 n pv n 7 ' '^ L �+a r. e ' •S C C .o U C .. 'n • G j M' 7c n r ry c O co, f• L w S I n�v f �� E. n io r�� p� Og r3e n ny = �� n r^e = a 0 w �r w 3 O--,< n Sr R. i E 3 c O G> > .- �' F rx N co ar?d'. E2. G co # p v,� A 7 p O p A L 'O"'.e•O^^i (wn0 n w G (9•n• Spp.£ r£y H.<r� j�.O G r < < 3 r+ U 'n+ c n N ^^ < r6 • d G. n G hU• ^ C n G i O r, n S ?f9 n r9 w .n.. w 1.r4' ^ w V O•o n C'w w�< C•3 .•n • rao mN= r0a roc ZG n:- o n a 5 - 3 4 n:3 =w o b 2 0 c Gp -n s < iYY[ w - < o p =' o 'w ro' rt ro'$� "'q co oI< n Y I n ..:G r; rrp' -n ""i n c 2 n ^ N£ U`< G n S „ F wO O•a w O [jc > a� 3 �_n^ c m a o 0" 3 • S-7 - 7, V. 2 S 3'7 �G=n 7 -'cr 2:2 r.`< -O O G ie --, n C T G:07 v.� .9 . 7%•n`6 3 7 c ric -ti :f O ro G' P c w 7r -p O 2.Oa 3 Pk•" as '' C S r 00 rt. 7r ro c.`..'v a c`< 3.< - r. sr• te c • z 2 T� = s. 3 n ern �° ^'� �e0� arc rt2 < r ^9 o o o Fes'- die -c ry c c = c - _r0�', c, n ±3 ^ ;r- 0 . n G.0 -, ;: m 0 c 3 -c .--11 G=a_F f _.`< n rt x = 3 =. t E.- j�• `' c c 7._ + ary w u G�G �. 7 ^ �' ram• rt, tr n a •c c p�}�?' _ r 7 O' ry 3 2.- <E. 0 rn n S r' c -n w n rp w n ry �. =U c C 1 • -c Crr7 O a F.�3 c i c ., r. i� 2 o c•2 200.P 2 "� " SG3.r<o S� n • 0-= n o9 art `--° an 0 •w, 3 ='f c j G� w o r• p ?Gr, n'� c 3 3 m cm �2'?�rn o< G�n2 =� GAR aw T` r S r•. ?£,:.7 - ,O n n •'� U n S L' n L n C. �. '� V n c W G Y:r, r. r., I C. •< .: . _ 3 2-r^.. c n U c v 2.< G c w r, c ^ c S' c- ,� r_', -6 7 G'S 3 7. G 7 3 6-R 'E n d. G!: r C 2 S^7, C G.^. i G = i 3'n C.G G n `- O n rD r G 2 ! i G n G r -e •r'.w F c c c r G . 3 c ,• ^ r £ S c G n•O S c .<• -I.< 0 .f = n c ry r; ^,^. ry r• r S - ,^.= •C G •„G. c J " O G.r.l tSe C.'0 c: W.a.7• O 2 3 c c s �� c' ?'F.E r G? co 3 3'� �� 0 0 Y_ n n c �� Tn r n < c c� 3 -� -3G �c2 ?nr ac 'Ina ?.ro: SF00 .F. "c-2r' o ? 0 _- WE?. S^ c c = 3 E N n w rp a.r27 G � n c • rc 3 0p o o ru ` S G 3 rp " 3`< n'.r.. r,'3. G'� n S W 7 .n. C -Gi'`'< S •0.,. G O rD 7 •n., rwir O G r,'�G coS G i r j'j • ^ S ro G 13 7c rt. fa.in Y r' ;, c w £ 2.0 Y w nc =3 S n G e ^r. O 7 S e O C•z' cc El.? .. A r c• f•L:35 7aoa•n nix 6 c643- ; xiD 1 __ X. .. � _ _ `. G.7 " n G`J'< 3r?�.,_ cL' s 7C n� 2i Imo. O ., , r � cS! � `° r m 3 ®I n J S.c.. E. 7 .< r' ^U, et U n r. G n S G c r L7 mom 40 Z __. IX t-"'o SS P ry t < Tz,= ss:. - r; r- m SQ CD c n •v io ry o' ry ^' < T P. ry m m O 0 c ^.� n p G uc x n w c rt. n / rw C 4G 3 :n... f0 n ,x f; j O G v O' %Iiiir O IIIII UtI1VUuiIH _'y w t � I n' Otlinger Rd. ` O .7' ' ,..,�L 1 R. "a t = _ '1 r c . 5- _.._.xiR+.Ir I�4 ro rt • r^o E-'"^T s= _ < �`� n S E0�0 S E.(�.o -� . ... , r� wa/f/ ;�� r" QJ= • 90.2rcw -j 06. '�/�` f c ?2 c 2 g2•�w n c n ^ G ry 3 c 2 IC eifgm'Sm3 3 G•< c F,'no �.G o.g'r'o �- 'o ^ s' n-.rc^, Randal Mill Rd. %. r= o o u ^.c c rr'c 2 S •c.` p,0 n rD S a N ' ' a m n m 3ic.e.. 0 g E n w c �3 c G 1 ?n r o e ,'a' ' Nit;" O °z ^- ;m n O S n •'n, O.< S Snn.,rro.0 �.G ry O c -� °i m 0 ._1 n 2seD ° qia: = Sco31,1 .0 =' !iU ©, , . m I.c n n co..< a a 1 ▪ C 7 O C U Q G :U ,p ps. C 2 .7.f_d c =t� g Cc _ C p a d vry YD `£ _7 7 A O 'y O O o io •3 n w U U 7, ,....,r.7 0 Ib G q.<'0 G ^ _ n 'Q a G b 7-U ^ n o G C ii c n O :`< rD '^•�� rO L ry U 7 Cni ^ .t w r S(D fD O'n `< N n.� fl p C.n S �ryOr^:S...... c". r0 F cw $� 2GrJ �°^ n � Gp � Tao02 R.nw - _wc nrPcs n '^� -20 `� n �:3 f° , o.U ,,-rl^ B. H o _3 3.- w 70 ^ n •� o oa o oneET -cI 2o m'S. o Sr7 ciooL n p �'cuo '0 2 ° �^.�.p o a -la-G^ E •o rt. o • -'' 4 • U 7 2.C n , O c 7 r'q 7 w w c n O.--C p C ` '�' y;n r<e so o' 0 °' Sc �CC ro 0 o c Cfro " Y-r-,i Fir o c:.c, 0 a- GP. n c2 � w -n.Tn 7r<= f�0 n ^ G y c G._O r' n 7r S C w G n.< p ^ r n (p n'_ G c.rgr^ r° < n.- w o OG•c..< 15< . PrwiA O.2' fo•r'n n £ OCc nonc �p ^ n p o r. '^ ^ p a < c rn a n r9 o n > > w� w Snc 3 3 .3 'g nuo ruO^o O c _• n _ _C•O C O_ "to rGo n r' .], E.G O y w c 2 7o r> c rr, C n' r v .T rSD c'O n S c p'OC ^ < !9 r. S L'fl �' O S'�n n L'�'-n^i w `? S C C Fr-n C u'O+ _. F ., 3.ro 3 n -I^ ^'= a F sf a 2 F 2 E a 7rc.c:�GE = 3� 2 •3 Q '1<�G �A' F. n F. o c-n n 0 U 3 GScuo ry t: 3 c 2 S n 0 G S� O a n-Fs.- , 5= S 1. �. a E o-' •C'1-0`< cry p rro g '9.- w�< ^ n^n cD n x E w c .,,c n w F n c 7.rno �.S`� a s0 < 2 £ c n wS.� c� ry • ry o �x uo w>r�rn nc ar2yc�7rhoS rGo N co P nrn'P3 ^ ' O T3h ^ os3 £ rod o f:2n rro n'e.3' 7.� •+�U N O n �.-•--]°''9 �•�•'ql 7 G co-rD n >r S.< .w. c 'O R n 0 r •-.• O� < c, re n c a n w G a n O c 7. .7_`'c-�' c c n -F P.G. `<7 cm 5,' a S:< G.�i' w r••< n'2•- '' yr ' U c c 7r n `° -. is ",r.no n ro ;'.< G n wv S o".rio •0 C ��7 w� F. 7 0 a.p c�Q 3 = . -.SGGy.y 3 �2.cJ5,n -r7< o o n • (TO c o s a w n x a R y c c O to c to n 0 w �P' o' -n r� O 0 0 a n cE .-4-nw r, m n n6. w `< • on r9'0 wco: Fr oz 9 �7w n c v,,< n �, c G.- E d rho �,rho o.o g 0 2'5. G,co p o"cc =w.,•j g 5' -- a rn 2 5 N 3 �p'o 2 n'rro' r7 c w _.ry no a n n rti is c c+n c o 0 0 rro' n.,n a r m 0,--, ',m= CD _.o ry= 3 aa� CD ro“, • n ^ Sr <.61�� 3 ^r'• -3-?3'n e. o o - Spa cr, o c 66S. ,5'SensG c{c " n n - " 2 vn2 Ye_ w'a uo G -11 O v, o's' n'a 9 c n n n w -•<< a c.n -, c .a rt O '0=. w G 2 2 yis �m3 "i •cwo•= n'� rc., oc-. o ,ycacro35- co?3•< < oAw ='<ckrbT36.c.c • 22 -ET.2 c n d 3 �� Q. c c w n c =o-1 /� w aowo 00 o rt c o Pr ro Y- ° _s�• o -2 �•o�Cn fno w Gc 7c o o.o aw W ?�"^ 5 6 n r e'-� S Pw. •Aso eno w w�'m' 3•= £.W� a �E,�^ w xan o G c� E £ o c c o = w ^. �00 G J n S UI •�_� a c n -• 3 < H �^ o .n < �� -1 ac cnc �� v'2' I H HrSoun^ u'o .co2' �w-' n°�° rS° 5 ^�, ee OA o-• C 0 SO 0 3 _es rox ro o n fb▪g.) 1011w • ' 4 a 0o 4. A O •< 7• S • A i -J 3. :n a i Z 7•a m 5 E.E . m 7 A • WI a A c• Q 7 T}}} O7 -o 5 - Z ; 0 7 F • i n 3=0.•E � •o cae � 4 co g, =,�n yy !�4 3 rf, a •c7= a- y 0- t?m a as = „n'.,,• cl C CA Cn ` �► * O p 3 • f — - SO Ervcc• 43n x e X Q.. -`e r) 9 o o sa d MN F�o$ y 77. = CD (\- . f A 5 rt ' C n S o N < N C co y a MI V a3 = o ce f w S^ = N __ I yCA Zrig < ~E. • M ^ n co - ^ a^X uCI 00 n f am ca D f OO S Ncr, -O,`G f�D m F Aoiiiillit b , 2 7.E,.., • c,,, c, a cr F.; 2.5'o o r ,.▪ ,..1 iNall - CI) = op co .S•,' n. '6,..-...--e .:-o o. ro.,-•pe.co n --. es* cn 5 $1., e. ry 7 t < ' e--r C S O O �,Ll N 7 S r IL C3Fd - COD --- am soy A R. � -30�� °' p"p c<o g c r0 rig O C4 O = -° c `< •`n cr An O a = -o2 n el a^ .. ....• pooa c a3� o 3 3 - ic-oa = 'fin' c3 a 5'^ c ^ '" = a "''' O D '� C) n- ro o 3 co . �c.n c n F.2 CO w a .1 0i S O N 5 CA c'N 7r. c „�• N NI rOi 4 ro . . --) CD O^ N 7 P1 g O N N ct Y = d Cr,p O 3 0 3 0;SO>5' 9 c °ry 7e�E 4E E l�1� $ o tTc_ 90 � n =o0 � E.R 5 � �� ; Cit) •A 5 f9 rt `?� n •7CTB N y_ �_ ,y • =n▪ r... • 0o C Ar Cn A 8 _ r^� O :co CO a c--r cn 5. o cc'„.> =fe cT..AO cpoo 2 c o = 0 3 n• SA, � 3 e e • � =man p � ° od O.D sn Omit y= n m wiil -4 • 32 ]gQ S w 9 , =rv � c Niiiimi• ! )°-• a� aDo0g° tor; I•m ` cnay ' gs = • A N _ yPa0 - +Al •, 69 coo 02.CO n ••< O _ 00 CC. C O � O A 1•8 g pa, •Y1 7• a s rqq • / ,.� of O r .. g..{• x- 7 rree w )i f a = Z18' n� k•. m re �f "' yy' a. Southiake - From Page Almost 40 volunteers assisted with festival operations, Southers said. Most were either high school students or from the Southlake chapter of National Charity League: The city broke even over the 1. festival, Southers said. The $6,000 cost was covered by spon- sorships and vendors. Sponsors were Star-Telegram/Northeast, Kroger, Magic Mike's Texaco, Radio Shack, Rialto Develop- ment, Southlake Chamber of Commerce, Southlake Family Medicine and Texas National Bank. NEWS CLIPPENG Source: T Date: — 1 a Westlake may lose . ,, Solana to Southlake BY MILES MOFFEIT , AND BRYON OKADA INSIDE: z Star-Telegram Staff Writers The lame duck Westlake Board of ROAN Aldermen plans to yank the Solana a li t,r $ 1$ $ A 4 , .,1 office complex — accounting for 95 7 s.• , d a f percent of Westlake's tax revenue — g from the town and give it to Southlake -, ,P , I before new board members take office p 1s Friday,officials said. Late last night, the outgoing alder- and they lost control of the board in men — Carroll Huntress, Al Oien, Saturday's election. Howard Dudley and Jerry Moore — The plan between Westlake and and Mayor Dale White posted an Southlake came to light last night in a agenda for a special 9 p.m. Thursday specially called Southlake council meeting to consider the disannexation meeting, where Southlake City Man- of Solana. Homes of all five men were ager Curtis Hawk said the entire 900- disannexed by the board on Friday, (More on WESTLAKE on Page 12) 1 t^ \fey ' I I m isWestlake al still tray++r because ne 1s Thursday's • allowed 10 Jays to appeal his removal from ulGce,held asps- agenda: From Page I vial hoard meeting last night wTrM sweet in the new board marl• WESTLAKE—AtThuts-_ — tors. the acre • corporate complex would Bradley met with Aldermadasn of wi. oorl he ceded hi Southlake. Fred held in another room of the me; Solana,estate-uGthe-art corn- complex to canvass the vote and plea that straddles the Westlake- to swear in Held.Charla Brad- ��na complex�reams Southlake border,was untouched Shaw and Abe Bush,who were Ing it from the town B furls as late as Friday night when the elected Saturday. diction; - aldermen approved a redrawn Bradley also vetoed the disan- •Approvinga contract It Westlake map during a massive nexation and announced that he Jisannexation process that had sent letters to Fort Worth. withLaidlawWasteSys- removed about 70 percent of the Keller, Roanoke,Trophy Club tems; • ' town, and Suuthlake asking them to ■Taking action neces- ' huntress and Moore did not take no action on Westlake sary with respect to pending .. rerun telephone calls last night lands. litigation involving the town. j and White was unavailable for On Friday, Aldermen and the aldermefl m. continent. Huntress.Moore,Oien and Dud- •indemnifying them- Southlake Mayor Rick Stacy ley disannexed about 70 percent selves from litigation-related. would not specify the property of Westlake.including the Circle matters; Involved. "We have a mutual '(Ranch and the properties of ■Payingattorneys agreement between Westlake the four aldermen and White.On defending the town: and Southlake," he said. "We Saturday morning, the Fort ■Paying election person- wtll try to incorporate part of Worth City Council met in a spe- net. Westlake.How much is undeter• cial session to extend its bound- The board has also mined at this titne." aries to the Circle I and other scheduled en executive ses- • Tots Allen of Maguire property the Board of Aldermen sionto receive attorney''s Thomas Partners, which owns released. advice on pending litigation... • the Solana complex, said he Oien lost his seat in the Satur- and on the town's pending asked for the disannexatiun. day election,and Moore was not application with the Texas'• "Yes,we did request it."Allen seeking re-election. Dudley and Natural Resources Goner-' said."I'm just not really ready to Huntress were not up for elcc- vction Commission for a • comment on it. We have not !ion, and although their homes certificate of convenience.. been involved in the fight lily were in the disannexed area. and necessity.After the ses- • Weslakel so far." they apparently can continue to sion,the board may with- t. Scott Bradley,ousted as may serve on the Board of Aldermen drew the application to the , or last month by the Board of until replacements are elected, new corporate limits of the'' Aldermen,said he learned last legal experts have said. town they set on Friday. night of the Solana plan.Allen Both factions,town residents Westlake and municipal told hint that the owners of the and officials of nearby towns say utility districts controlled by mixed-use business park tear that they expect that the courts Ross Perot Jr.had each • hut it will he absorbed by Fort will have to sort out all the legal filed applications with the Worth. questions involving Westlake. conservation commission "Tom underlined that leaving The 2nd Court of Appeals for the rights to supply water Westlake is not their prefer- yesterday heard arguments about to the town,including Per- ' ence."Bradley said."Putting the whether the Board of Aldermen ot's Circle Ranch. agenda item on does not mean acted properly in removing On Friday,the Board of they will follow through with it, Bradley front office,hut it did Aldermen voted to disannex he told me.Their fear is that not set a date for a ruling. the ranch as well as their they could end tip in Fort Bradley contended that his own properties. Worth." ouster violated his constitutional Solana accounts for about 95 right to due process and state percent of Westlake's annual laws requiring impartial judges. lake. income—about 5700,000 in During arguments.his attorney One of the aldermen's last sales tax and about 52011,00 l in Eldridge Coins characterized the franchise fees each year,Bradley aldermen as being"on a steam- items of business Friday was to MM said. roller to blow this community approve a revised Westlake map, Solana was originallydorm_ but it appeared to lop till'Brad- off the face ofthe Earth."'sa shaw's home, as well as the sated by IBM,but the company As the aldermen's attorney, home of others critical of the relinquished more than a million Marshall Searcy described Tar- hoard.Yesterday,Town Attorney square feet in the complex as it rant County District Judge Bob boat Wood said a copy of the new mina began layoffs about to five years McGrath's move to try block ago. In the years since,Solana the proceeding with a temporary I could be obtainedfrom owners refilled the space with an restraining order"abusive dis- Town hall.But Town Secretary array of high-profile corporate cretion"of his court. Ginger Crosswy said the alder- clients,including l.evi Strauss. On the day of the trial, men had not provided her with Citicorp,PCS PrinteCo,Nokia. Bradley had obtained a court o+ne. Wells Fargo, McKesson Corp. order from McGrath,declaring If Bradshaw is not a resident, and AMR Corp. the proceeding unconstitutional, she may not be eligible to hold Southlake City Council has but the appeals court later stayed office. r scheduled a special meetingat 5 "I am not on there..:(hey pc the order.another the orderial,Bradley adopted an incorrect map.Why p.m. ex,the Thursday to accept cethd isrtobtainedal, thtblocking adopt an incorrect map'!"Brad- complex,the council announced his removal,but that order was chew said yesterday."I'm omn- a last night's meeting. blocked. cared about that because we • "We're doing this to put our- If the appeals court upholds need to figure out the correct selves in a position to protect our the aldermen's position,ques • - interests,"City Manager Hawk Lions remain about whether the map."After she is sworn in, said. fragments of Westlake that Bradshaw said.she plans offi- Suuthlake officials were hesi- remain can legally he a town.'Ili cially question the accuracy of the town map during a town • rant to discuss the possible protect theirlegal eight , sur- pectin annexation of Solana. roundingcities are havingmeet- The federal Department of Asked who in Westlake the ingc to extend their jurisdiction Justice will also decide whether agreement was with,Stacy said, if the town must disband. the Jisannexation is Jiscrimina- answer later repeating the The question of ou of which can- toryw voters. If not,the disan- umwer later. will al of the vote is effective nexation is effective from the Both White and Bradley will also probably be made tea elate it was approved by the claim to be Westlake mayor. courtrooms,said Robert Parton, Bradley's supporters won a Tarrant County election adminis- board and signed by the mayor.• majority on the Board of Alder- lralnf. state officials and municipal nI e ♦ Ill. men in Saturday's election. Another question is how lung :III+Bush salt he would"like to When the new Board of the aldermen who were Jisan- have the old town'Westlake' Aldermen and Bradley arrived vexed can continue to serve in back like it was." last night at Town Hall—which office. "I've told the Perot group I'm is in the Solana complex,they Ilunress said yesterday that not against teem, long as hound that White had the locks he has"been told I could stay in g' changed on Town hall.White office until Aug.9,the date of they'd work with us.'They've has called a meetingFridayto even told me that I'm open- the next general election." minded;'Bush said. canvass the vote and install new A court may also have to • board members. decide whether Charla brad- yta(l writer Nell Btruam�n Bradley,who contends ttt�t he shaw's property is still in esl- contributed to this report. NEWS CLIPPING Source: Date: 9tJ V I I I 1 ,,--t , I Southiake to vote on Westerra plan ,. requesting zoning that allows al to rezone residential property BY BRYON OKADA many possible uses for the land, on Farm Road 1709 to a11ow'an. Star-Telegram Staff writer including manufacturing busi- office building. ''I SOUTHLAKE—Two of three nesses. A number of residents who live properties pegged for major office Westerra developers said they near owner Jerry Black ate and commercial development in need flexibility in zoning to adapt expected to protest, contending the heart of Southlake are expect- to the businesses that come might to be voted on at tonight's City in. g that a change would set a prece- edCouncil meeting. "It's allowing commercial prb'- g Its the chicken and the egg jects to be built on less-attractive ' If built, Westerra Timarron's thing," Westerra's development residential lots alongFarm Raid three-phase, 531-acre mixed-use manager Steve Yetts said. "We 1709. ::,y project north of Texas 114 would have to have the zoning in place Because more than 20 perciiit be the city's largest development. to market the property." The council is expected to Council members also of the property owners within a make a final decision on the 58- expressed concerns about allow- rezo200-foot radius is opposed to'ttfe acre Phase 1 of the Timarron pro- ing major commercial develop- rezoning, a super-majority vitae r i ;ject and to take an initial vote on ment in Phases 2 and 3, which (six of seven) is required for the 272-acre Phase 2, the largest would be across the street from a approval. property of the project. residential area. In a tentative vote April 15,t. e Phase I was tentatively The possibility of manufactur- council unanimously agreeo approved at the April 15 meeting, ing companies near houses has allow rezoning of Black's pro but several council members been the focus of resistance to the ty, opening the way for a 2-stow, asked developers to add more projects,Yetts said. 10,000-s.gµare-foot corporate a park space and amenities. That "The challenge with Tracts 2 headquarters for Medical Air Ser- section includes 100 feet of set- and 3 are their proximity to resi- vices. back on the west side of White dential areas," Yetts said. "We That zoning is the "highest apd Chapel Boulevard across the have tried to incorporate increased best use" of the property," Coun- ' 1 street from houses. setbacks." cilman Wayne Moffat said. "This Residents near the project said Also tonight, the council will particular structure is going:to they worry that Westerra is make a final decision on apropos- look like a beautiful dwelling. i i NEWS CLIPPING Source: The Dallas Morning News Date: May 7, 1997 ii� t P ' . - aces . ..,-,,,:.,,,,.,.. ,4,...:. f .. loss o } ,', ;,.n , � f "_,. office complex i �� Trophy Ciub � � p Westlake �,1 :� faces loss of Town's largest taxpayer requests w ,' ,-, -, disannexation to join Southlake N ., F By Joy Dickinson ' office park =-�g K' 6 Northeast Tarrant Bureau of The Dallas Morning News V SJ A� � :, SOUTIILAKE — The town of Westlake, al- Continued from Page 35A. Wes Solana office Pt ready hacked to geographic bits,now faces simi- bent didn't run for re-election, `f'Y complex tar financial devastation if aldermen agree to a resultingin a new board that opposes , A '� ��r.:s: ; ' : "'* request by the Solana office complex to be disan- both the previous and proposed dis- ` ' ®' � n ' nexed from the town. annexations. • '' ., Solana officials have requested that 468.6 The Solana disannexation would cs 8, s acres be disannexed by Westlake and that the leave only about 400 acres in West- Z' " t town release Solana from its jurisdiction into lake,down from 4,700. ,— -- that of neighboring..Southlake. - --r-- _a The loss of Solana, provides + i�wrco. onvi The remainder of the approximately 900acre, about 95 percent Westlake's tax ; multi-use complex already is in Southlake, in- revenues,could be the fatal blow for ' ` cluding American Airlines' Sabre reservations the beleaguered town of 250. ; �g complexHighway Scott Bradley, who was ousted as ' ® "x Ali building. The straddles State : t''^ ® 4 114 at Kirkwood Boulevard mayor last week by aldermen, said ' ' If approved at a meeting Thursday,the disan- Solana accounts for about$700,000 an- ',; F 1.;,,' ' -p i; notation of Solana would be the final act of the ntially in sales taxes to Westlake, as l`* . , & ' ',� town's current board of aldermen,one of whom well as about $200,000 in franchise � '' - , . '`- was voted out of office Saturday.Another incum- fees + r- ©vm. ,. Please see WESTLAKE on Paget37A. Solana officials stressed that noth- en the timing of Westlake's meeting, ing has been made final"Frankly,we Southlake City Manager Curtis Hawk don't know exactly what's going to said the council would convene at 5 happen yet,and we won't until West- p.m.,"then we'll probably go eat,and lake takes action,"said Bill Flaherty, then we'll come back about 9:30 and senior vice president of Maguire Part- do whatever we need to do." ners,which owns the complex. Mr. Hawk said it's a mistake to He disputed reports that Solana assume this is a "done deal." officials asked for the Southlake ac- Mr. Hawk noted that Solana al- tion to avoid being annexed by Fort ready is Southlake's biggest corporate Worth. The Fort Worth City Council citizen, even without the land now voted Saturday to extend its extrater- under consideration. ritorial jurisdictionto include the Cir- Both Southlake and Trophy Club cle T and other disannexed land,giv- had items about Westlake on their ing it first dibs on annexing the Tuesday night council agendas but property."It's simply that it would be were not expected to take any action. best for us to be in one community, Roanoke,however,did take action and we already have a good relation- Tuesday night by settling its land dis- ship with Southlake," Mr. Flaherty pute with Westlake. said. By unanimous vote,the City Coun- Westlake will consider Solana's re- cil accepted 270 acres into its extrater- quest at a special meeting at 9 p.m. ritorial jurisdiction. Council mem- Thursday.Southlake had called a spe- bens met Saturday to discuss the cial meeting for 5 p.m. Thursday to settlement offer, but delayed a deci- deal with Westlake's decision,but giv- sion until Tuesday night. + F NEWS CLIPPING Source: The Dallas Morning News Date: May 8, 1997 w�� ° 0a a) a) 03 ". � 2.). w 0 0 a' a 3 344 uX � . caamo tV 0 ° h_ o . O ° ° t >.°a c, v >, aa, ca je V 0a � 3 �os.d � 0aea . 4, c. « o a 93 � ycac yO 43 ° cuQq c0q0 • c. c y . ai00aia) aTyaoE ' s y — > v . .x a0yc. va � -rC•I. aag a a O . a as v � o0I...MPli , ° a aY " a � K y > ° V 2a > at 7.3 ,O .. o a « a ° -. y r., 0a � 43 ~ 0) Vaa - '' U - > 3 O >•, a� K a •�' yya ao a 0 � ' ' 0 ca'° y 0 a' • mt .0 ° , p-800)� a) �Na OQ E O 2 O V o C a) c - m «•c. q a v .. l . a ° I _ a °O a Myoda. qa c. 'o s • ai' •• yya a , ' E0 °1a .2a) a ° mvi .C/ bar g0 CU a � - v Ca paa ° . a da 0 . 4)•X c.. •ao73 aa, oo3 cas� a°� " oa . 1 '�� a) Ecaalvu ,... w- .a0 4 .. a5 $ � a 74 .6 as .4.0 Oc. Ai O ' cog) CV da)�pa> . x4 . aa) wp4 a3O 4 5 23 a '� . 5u -. - ) o �•4 ao a) . • ai0 ` - 4i _ Vaaoo0 c. .4a .O24 " Vai 03 CD Y V 0 cu aI c. ° T o o as c �, itsa) c:1 • c. a J cu a 'CC a3 y o w b Q ` o;; `'p 0 I � ° OF)63 y o ce) c.Z ° a a) ava O .a -. a)'1. › s a a 4 y3 _ tea0 `" aay >a « 4) W V "O '° Ella a)= " c � W ° a a�,gg 2 •-• • 0 (/S y A.w y q� w n 2 a °c 3b ,aq� Y•o r'i, dz •�* .O y a a E+ U 00.0 U O -R. -�"+ O m o • >.... 00 N 0 1 4O p g •0O •d .bw a4i 8 q › O tz•� ~j- `.' 00„ �'" .+ 3 0 ' . i d t0. •... 'd 111 11 of y : .O'). 'P., 8 sao �,y �A� .;.0� 3a0 «, oDoo � y3c. 0 �,,,1 O 3� oa' '4Noa2 ~ moos.:cot Irj' '0t"° ►�+-12 A.O to. w 8 a', a 1 .VC > > N 0 PI .4 0 y y O y a 0 y1 44 v ai oyw •4 t~ b2' S. 0 a ... 0 C) - a>, 0 alga-El 0 g s E, a) 2 2 0 ,F- el Te) . v to b y N ,yy I. A.� T. ..°y p a.... 0 o Pw.4 v 00 0 $il 2 a � ^ , O a) O cam. C b y ° M0 0 to.O 0 a ° aj as�q /� a+ a) -• •.. a) op a a7 y e0.4 ,q •-•, -. as b 'd e0 .4 a).4 `y m d9 F a a o .14 cam. a" y� v c1, m .� a .o , •..0 3 0 a, 0 vyac3 cn c. ac� .4aOaa p a '4 cny es .. Q I] do caa� a tidc. o _. a.«. .2y «. ..... u o _, >, V v°-. 0 ,•7 - N o 9 A >,...a .^J > a c% g.a> V N cya a) a) v c.. 0 A ' U ac b co a as " u ki avi va a 0 aa) A pOO to to a > o Oac q; Nb ..14. co14 0 'av A o �40 c. 03 0 . o a ~c.0 C O. 0 .0 0 CI >. c+ 0p u01 O b p.0 ti .4 N .r a; N as b A.,,,.. N O Q 4 O y itr 2 a O 0 a N 04 0 .4 a a) 2 a °O ac «. O a� 4 ° O ° of is m,4 ° N _ PO Ss' •00 c. CO cn a 2. .4 v 3 ... ''4 V > y V Southlake approves -13 2 projects • BY KLLLIL B.GORILY 4..teYOr 4Y1 wrwn SOLRNLAKE—City officials have given approval to the initial phase of Southlake's first large- scale commercial development . projects,despite concerns from homeowner that the projects will • encroach on their neighborhoods. In another move.the city has ap• proved construction of a 2-story of- fice building east of Southridge lakes Parkway on land surrounded by residential property off Farm Road 1709.The office property was a residential site owned by Jerry Black. At its Tuesday night meeting,the City Council unanimously ap- proved the first phase of Western Timarron's massive mixed-use project,which will Ming corporate offices,shops,homes and perhaps a coo hotel to the city. Zoning approved for the 58-acre 0 tract at Dove Road and Texas 114 will allow buildings as tall as 6 sto- ries.but the developer will need a A special-use permit to build more 81 than 4 stories.city officials said. Developers agreed to abide by 35- fo of open space buffers for residen- tial areas along(hove Road. The council also gave prelimi- nary approval to zoning for Phase 2 of the Western plan,which is a 272-acre tract near North White Chapel Boulevard,North Carole Avenue and Texas 114.The tract, the la projtect, in Western's"coithren- phase project,is slated for a"com- mercial campus"and some residen= tial development. A final decision tin Phase 2 is •scheduled for May 20. - c"'"' Residents said they are worried that changing the agricultural zon- ing of the Black and Western Phase 2 properties to commercial • would set a dangerous precedent for the city. Cig Homeowner%near Western Phase 2 said their homes would not he shielded from noise.drainage problems and increased traffic. "We feel like we have to rely on —you to protect us,"homeowner Chris Enzenberger told council member during a session that con- • tinued until after 2 a.m.yesterday. Residents also complained that Western developers had not com- municated with them and did not offer to compromise.Water'of- OD ftciats told the handful of residents who remained al the end of the • meeting that the company hopes to a enlarge the buffer zone by the next council meeting. The council made its decision about the Black property earlier in • , the session,when the council cham- hers was jammed with almost 100 residents,many of whomm opposed the proposal. Black had asked the city to change the zoning foe his land to allow Medicaltoul officesAr Servicesthe id- - ^ As- sociation to build in the mid• /`..('./1 dle of a residential area. "It erodes away just a little bit more of what makes Southlake a special place to live."said home- owner Bill Leary of Sabine Court. "Eventually we will be no different. than the cities we left to come' here." Some residents,such as Zen. Rucker,who lives on Carroll Av- enue,said she supports the project. "It would give better balance to have commercial development here."she said."The building is beautiful,and I don't see why any- . one would object to the architec. Ar Er • Y ^c; r�� ao -FYnn��< n = 3 ail° c1 ^ ono o E �� < d5.Engo � +�7 o n 7� CID � o y ng E aE n•co �� y� r a d Kr7 'Mtn n n O i, rn n 7 no a n-- ,,, "° -N 4o 0 o.°a" %, — 5 +n n CD-a S w - 5 E s, E O ^ rt.w, 'e•e CO Cl. r, '< •e o a .,, -•e - E x n n ° c. 3 c d _.n G n, C n 3 n—. O n C<'r, ry G D... N'C 3, a P, "7 G.Co)..n n rt w 7r y 10 II' N E E (j,°•, CD w•N w r., CO. a'Nb. ,„ ° � „ o n o ceT , n. ds CDn n w w 3 — N F C R vC, y d 3 T O c X a3rroo •row, of ° � w�'rs00 ,oeoGP�' �' r �.°= 0 O d A O 7r O w n n O . 0'3 7 x = S. tinit 7 00.......,-,. = -, w n N d Q w�N = ._...,� g d o n c S o 7r3 E. 3 ° r-•0 ° 3 0 3 O rn<< ., n • `<Ennd o 00 � .,,. non 0000 _ r0 0 ,‘Ona F.o rt c o Sn rp Ya a 3• "a n 3.�3 co ' c•o c —3 -1=.3 s'c '• 3 e 3 N C i n n re'O ='3 3 S'•0 w •a ,. ,E. O G .•-° 1 (11 nnPnynXnd ro ^ F •?n� or^, Kt.Ko ^ COw0R7 A RNnOo ^.a " n >o ro ' wn1110.wno�10 = N n • (. oC''n swi5 g3 n ° ,n,, ,, ... E d`< o8- G n n O a �n "e S n 3- •e ri' o nS ^ CG : e° r � w Co O-N7, ... C S O Cr .N w. .O v G i � Ow° w ° = w QC .. , f 9• n C•c O n o n' G. 5 N 2. rwi g. 2, d 7 Se S d E 2� I N m c a 3 w g Saa0Y•* a_ '3 P'on c7O ^ • NSw� �oE.a° CA a ( SZ .'4 w C o•^o c - '8 . °r R'S r E•n Q E;C r?, y o x H▪ R o 2 PD ^ E = c.N o d g w �.c.pS, Cro I Ar im CA no go '▪ O.0 •-• nn 3 ci=-aa n -nA _^. ?. Cc ra _o y d g 00 G A W+y y - S- w N C 7 ^ Q7 o x � "*E • c •C =a •- 09.n.E �. onnc 77.5: - 3.-.�� f. co o N.0•7.w n N _ .e , �V oar-on �� ..• r°nr°i�w �' �°Jn ��.� o �� nN' A p 7 w `<<e 7 ��n `• < n D Si" Nill-°n ran n.= -c C - O d -n �n y OO 3• �.. r�1 1 Y`o� °' wao..< g•-* 4E _-.g o E.`< " .N. 3 H O It 5 a. 5 5.ra .e r' & ary.P- E o w —w r9 w"o ae'-d,w., e' f�9 d O. 'O () da w :•o ': n c rE _?3 c << as o e.n _ c n p�� °1.e m w'o ;c . 3 F•N N n n R' gn > >-N w w to 7a n - K•5' la . 'w' E rly n °o =3 0 ,or. •o 0." n 0 •:n co n 0 n nay < _.nC,(5 dd�o _ �w o on Y rwi A rde ro w w n oo -o a•.- a`<� a -g n .1dro 0.'dg . - O O,En ,� F. n - ? 3• ecaA .'�' d3 . $� oono y - - ,s cc -n-n w ,3 N a •• - R -•o N n o < C�4C 5 o o E c g o•E I -jo o r'o'" c m a =^ 2'd �_�'rE, oa. o0 8 n y°� �> n n a �-� Ea, 3'N n.':N.r<n ;; c, O.41 S o " aw•< < ,'.9 m wn▪ N ' a • ; n o E �• oS'ono .g ° 3.a n N E y'O -, o•o o N . o 8 o n E.R.a0 Q S EE.g.n. A,0.`� E o H E , E n ''po 0'_.aa L.L aoto 9 4, f9 "' rNi 9,, d H'0 A g o' O d M. a. rvo� �y •g y S c E d ~ H G a=r ii`� Oclu 5 N c g d a �o n.1 o K o ^ y n aE; o e R3 p, �'8 O o N'fS �i co Da S r a„ p N rA'E ° Oc ^.c.E oo ..j11. c G.w E w g, n w ., ♦C� a i F• :YEWS C L.IPPENG Source: k� /I r i r / 40 III Date: 5— - Troparrested in hy Club ' decent expo sure case Star-Telegram SOUTHLAKE _ • Club man was Sout A Trophy i Yes rda y on hake Jail late ex suspicion posure after stoppin t , -t e/nale motorist whose d tndec= i$ ken down,police said. The 26-year-old man was ex- pected to be arraigned today on a charge of indecent exposure, of- ficials said. • The incident happened about 7 a•m•yesterday in the 400 block of Kimball Avenue after a man helped push a Dallas woman's car to the side of the road, Southlake Department of Public Safety spokesman Malcolm Jackson said. After the car was safely off the road, the woman briefly turned away from the man,Jackson said. "The next time she saw him, he was standing by the passenger side with the window down and expos- ing himself,"Jackson said. The woman stayed in her • the man walked across the street to use a pay telephone,Jackson said.`1.1 The woman called police with • her cellular telephone. "We arrested him while he was still on the phone,"Jackson said. • City 0, r.t- y studies possibility 4, of creating TIF district Progress Report As Southlake continues to grow at its present explosive rate its need for a new City Hall Si complex has become increasingly necessary. The population has doubled over the last six years. City offices areGO already located in two different — - buildings which makes things inconvenient for citizens and ' somewhat inefficient for city ; employees. ��, One option the City has to pay for a new central facility to house its offices is to create a lbtreinvestment zone, or Tax Increment Financing (TIF) 1 district. By using a TIF the City can build and pay for a new City Hall, and any other municipal amenities it chooses, d F by using the incremental tax dollars generated in the reinvestment zone to pay the tab, all of which can be j accomplished without increasing citizen's property --_. taxes. It is required, however, _ that these amenities be built within the boundaries of the TIF once such boundaries are established. The City is see"TIF"page 4 t [rrr nearly two years. A City commissioned study done by ;' ,FANTUS Consulting in TIFNovember, 1995,recommended E. Highland St. that the City seriously consider from page I ways to improve its image and make itself more appealing to currently considering Z the type of business community establishing TIF district that S+� IN it wanted to attract. TIF's are a would includee all land within an e Duey A 3 way of saying "we are willing area bounded by Highland Ave. to work with you,but we want a th the north, ball R Aon. he Q Il = quality development in return." the west, Kimball Rd. on the t. O A CDD The study went on to say, east,and Southlake Blvd.on the Southlake features strengths south. At present a large U that can place it among a select component of the land within Z number of communities in this designated reinvestment terms of quality, type, and zone is being taxed at the low u development...", type ad agricultural rate. What a TIF Southlake Blvd. desirability healthy interest residents does is allow the City to use the in the policy arena makes it all incremental increase in property Map not to scale the more important to taxes caused by new by adequately explain the development to repay any debt The TIF beingstudied would be bounded N. Carroll to the advantagesq to taking a it incurred to build whatever west, Highland St. to the north, N. Kimball to the east, and well-considered amenities the City chooses to Southlake Blvd.to the south. - proactive,ppproave to economic hued, i.e. City Hail, parks, etc. The ultimate success of the TIF expires as a result of such Square" project at 1709 and development,"evealedlt the study 1 requires tne,9articipation of five development having occurred. Carroll, is likely to be the first revwback to high s a separate taxing entities, which The developers, on the participant in the new TIF. usersdrw the lack attractingan identifiable end include: the City of Southlake, other hand, do not directly They have already agred to center ofround which a Tarrant County, Tarrant County receive any of the TIF donate the land to the Cityfor a townlocational identityroucould be Hospital district, Tarrant generated dollars. They get City Hall,as well as acreage for County Junior College district reimbursed from the TIF fund parks and a band shell pavilion. established. Southlake mustesek a balance the and the CISD. Each of these only for the costs incurred for Dollars created in the new TIF ualit of-life concerns between some entities can pledge up to 100% the construction of public can be used to pay for a myriad quality-of-life s and the need for a of their increased incremental purpose improvements, but it is of municipal improvements, rmore balanced tax base to tax benefits that occur as a to their advantage to create a such as the City Hall itself(the m art risingctaxdemand and result of the development very high quality development City is also talking with the rppor community,it within the TIF. By around the public improvements Carroll ISD to build a joint City growing is a fiscal necessity said. participating they delay their paid for by the TIF, to attract Hall/CISD Administration tax revenues to the extent of the best users possible. building housing both that Southlake attract the best in the oneualitcommercial users as their participation for the What a TIF does is facility), landscaping for the q that bng the most specified life span of the TIF, encourage a higher quality of parks, park benches, fountains, possibly which has a maximum length of development to occur faster street lights, the band shell benefit for the community. 20 years. within the zone's boundaries. pavilion, trails, sidewalks, a TIFs promote planned The benefit to the The biggest benefit to all community theater, and sports developments and discourage the inconsistent look seen in Tarrant County parties involved participants comes from the facilities to name a few. can be compared to the type of development built on The City has a number many of the surrounding cities performance of an investment the property. It allows the of funding options available to Want so at ma to Southlake residents portfolio. Tarrant County developer to invest more of it to pay for the building of the sooner than would otherwise parties participate in these types their money at a faster pace public improvements it so happen thus netting them a of public/private partnerships which will increase the taxable specifies. They will not, larger returnu in the long run.h on a countywide basis value of the property, thereby however, obligate any dollars g n-win- (Grapevine Mills for instance), enabling the City in turn to until development begins This can be a win-win- and win situation forn as City, and do so to generate long term repay its debt at an accelerated provides a wayto repay the for the for the returns maturing at different pace. It is important to note obligations.vy for th er countyif it and structuredor times. They are willing to that all participating entities Everyone involved dedevelop " Mayor Stacy, sacrifice their short terns share will continue to receive 100% knows that it is inevitable that correctly," ct time said act is now." S of the incremental tax increases of the tax revenue they are some type of development will The nw." has generated (over the lower tax presently getting. The Ill,only occur on the properties withi been under concept offtion fors rate they now receive). in order affects the increased value of the TIF reinvestment zone. Byhat the City to encourage rapid quality the property over and above its pariptingain a n an TIF, the henvironmCity ent can also pay for The fact tha new City development that will return present value. hopes to crethem much higher tax dollars Cooper & Stebbins, that will allow more upscale Hall without increasing taxes over the long term when the TIF who is developine the "Town high quality projects to emeree also makes the idea compelline. YEWS CLIPPENG Source: fag Date: -�( - Ti ' arron and Black granted final approval by City Council Progress Report The City Council voted approve to two highly charged agenda items at their May 6 meeting. Both cases had been contested by area residents all through the rezoning process. Medical Air Services received the rezoning they requested to build a two story office building on property owned by Mr. and Mrs. Jerry ! I Black. The Black's 1.3 acre lot is adjacent to the Southridge Lakes subdivision tennis courts and fronts Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709). Medical Air Services will construct their corporate headquarters on the site. Councilmember Pamela Muller addressed the large , crowd before the public hearing opened saying, "Often we pass' things on a first reading but that doesn't guarantee it will pass on the second reading. And length of residency does not give one any special privileges, we are all equal citizens. Each case must stand on its own merit." Citizens both in support of and in opposition to the see"Council"page 6 I quaint LIUUNMU Lam. I Council In other action, the Council approved appointments from page 1 to the many volunteer boards and commissions that aid in the project made their way to the function of the city.They are: podium to make known their Park and Recreation- points as the council listened Gary Beyer intently. Richard Anderson Prior to the vote Robin Jones councilmember David Harris Teen Court Advisory Board- said, "We on the Council have David Harris been subjected to all kinds of Kathy Turner pressure. and if we can't stand Health Officer- up to that pressure then we're in Dr.Anshon trouble, and if anyone thinks Building Board of Appeals- that any one of us on this Bobby Harrell council has not acted in an John Reynal ethical manner, then shame on Don Light them. Michael Crowe Councilmember Scott Board of Adjustments- Martin told the crowd, "If Fred Joyce people moving here think the Art Sorenson door closes behind them they John Smart are sadly mistaken.I believe we Ron Troy can use this project to point to George Dalton and say to other developers, if Planning and Zoning- you want to be in Southlake you Rob Jones have to be this good." Jim Murphy Councilmember Gary F.C.LeVrier Fawks was the sole no vote on S P D C- the issue citing his concern of a Rick Stacy two story building going up Pamela Muller • next to residential uses as his Bethann Scratchard reason. Ronnie Kendall Timarron - Westerra DFW Airport Representative received the go ahead to begin Pamela Muller development of their Tract I at Mayor Pro Tern- the corner of Hwy. 114 and Ralph Evans Dove Rd. on the west end of Deputy Mayor Pro Tem- town, on a 7-0 vote by the David Harris Council. Senior Advisory Board- Timarron's Tract II also Martha Greenberg passed its first reading on a 7-0 Wanda Buschman vote. It will come before the Francis Wiser council at their next meeting for Crawford Hall its second reading. Neighbors Linda Moore(alternate) are still concerned about Zena Rucker(alternate) building setbacks and drainage on the large 272 acre tract. Timarron agreed to a 300 foot"no build" zone along Carroll Ave. unless they brought forward a user that the residents agreed was satisfactory to go inside the zone. Drainage they said would be addressed at the site plan level and that city officials would have to approve any drainage plan. Mr. Ken Smith was granted approval on the first reading of his rezoning request on 44 acres he owns between Crooked Lane and the Commerce Business Park. The Council did make changes to the concept plan offered by Mr. Smith to better protect the homeowners nearby and the integrity of the narrow but U ; : £EIJdIJJh 4 to o gco ; . p; Ao ; a„. ei � ba c� °� y ° cy °• � o ae� r 'V cD 5sue ° •» � Q. air , ... , cn C' y' 0 �V0 ^ 2 y. c° b m to , , 0n _ 3 °_• ° O CsD °_ 0 En "9Xy . a ^-1N �oct. • d = N +, aOzo < .E3E � § 6 ° r -71 0. (D (D y .� y y" D 6 Olt :'.I CD 0 �, p- (D O 4 Q =a. cp 0 n O p, toy v�a' to Q, eill) :l Uf y� ° ° N ° {A y M. I a'Fii Ctit 5 et) i A ,,e! .th. ,...3 p a.?..10 S I crtis• jot co r,-„ z ,, § 5 = rio 5 0 cil a..n a, c N '". CD 1< ^ CD O 0 ►, fCD Q _� '•1 .- i CD g . O RItop O E. 0 ±, & 1 p, (D O C O =•c Iona _, ° C a y as -• 8y , v01 ›,..„ 5 X' ,-.1 loo rn PO ' CI • wFc�DnnAo� y oADA, a. et r CP CD OQO ' CoI < a' AL. t (D CD (D I `< nFt", O G O O cln .,'� .(y C j .. bC CDW•< 0'..-' t��D A•� M 0.C c .p�� n.= �.cooGO.�0CR• c`< 0rD (D Q S = 97g"el C ._ 1 r i • field,who won re-election Sat- Westlake urday, said yesterday morning's k r. meeting was called to swear in , From Pae I +ti • - himself, ('harla Bradshaw and ` b , el s. '.: Abe Bush, with Bradshaw being i I appointed mayor pro tem. I he of■ Aldermatn AI Oien,who was $ l �. liven had been sworn at a meet- /in Saturday's balloting, +�{ r r • tng Bradley called Monday.. but t , ‘estetday said he does not intend .1. > ,, ww Field said the procedure was done i to relinquish his seat until a "le- * �f again"to reaffirm our position." gitimate" election is conducted. The rehiring of (sham was I'hc outgoing board had said it I, needed "to get someone in there , would canvass the election and ,hi / i who knew the history of the swear in new members today. �•, town,"Held said.!sham had been • The outgoing Guard of Al- F F, ' `' the town attorney from 1973 until dermen voted last night to disan- Scott Bradley: Says he willwntinue last month. nex the Solana complex and allow his battle despite yesterday's ruling Bradley said the meeting was Southlake to annex it.Owner So- /, conducted to support appeals of lana,Maguire Thomas Partners • ' called the town offices and"con- the disannexations and his ouster. requested the disannexation he- firmed that no one was there." Huntress and Dudley, whose cause of the town's bitter discord, Carroll Huntress: Alderman gets They then authorized the transfer terms have not expired,were not - • according to a written statement comptroller's office to wire$ff7,W0 with just Huntress' signature, an present. presented to the hoard. apparent violation of their own Oien later described Bradley's • Southlake City Council I think it would have been over in policy. Money can be transferred voted unanimously late last night, a month.Now I think it will take by phone using the TexPool pin "I f th had allowed after the Westlake vote,to accept two years to be over," he said. number, or by a written request �' I the Solana property into its extra- "Now it is going to take a little with two authorized signatures, Judge McGrath's order t territorial jurisdiction and begin longer to clean this mess up." according to the policy. to stay in effect,I think it aYnexation proceedings. The ruling was disheartening to Clancy said TexPool officials Bradley said that with yester- Alderman Fred Held, who sup- often offer leeway to small-town would have been over in day's appeals court ruling and ports Bradley. officials. a month.Now I think it other developments, it may take "1'm losing a lot of faith in the "He is an authorized represent- years for the courts to sort out judicial system,if I haven't lost it ative of the town," Clancy said. will take two years to be who is in charge of Westlake and already,"Held said. "If he had a PIN number, he over" whether the recent d i s a n- Huntress, Oien and fellow Al- could have called and it wouldn't —Scott Bradley nexations will stand. dermen Jerry Moore and Howard have raised an eyebrow." ousted Westlake mayor But Oien and other aldermen Dudley put Bradley on trial last Town Secretary Ginger Cross- _who ousted Bradley and voted to week, accusing him of incompe- wy said that as of Wednesday,67 emergency meeting yesterday disannex Koss Perot Jr.'s('ircle'I tency and official misconduct. checks for$1,000 had cleared the morning as "an exercise in tutil- Iianch and other properties said They claimed among other things town's checking account at Keller ity" that the court ruling shows that that he misled them in the an- State Bank. Two authorized sig- . I see no reason for paying any Bradley has no authority to act on nexation of Stagecoach Hills and natures are required on checks attention to those activities," he behalf of Westlake. altered minutes of a meeting. above $1,000 from the town's said. ."So far, we're been correct at Bradley and the four aldermen checking account,Crosswy said. Oien also said he does not anti- e'Nery juncture, and I anticipate All the checks were made to cipate leaving office in the near maintaining that position," Oien Wood's law firm,she said. future,even though he lost in Sat- said. "The election was pri- Huntress declined to comment urday's election and his term has At last night's meeting, at- marily made up of non- on whether he transferred the expired. Carney Bill Wood of Wood, money and signed the checks. Oien, Dudley, Huntress and "Thacker & Weatherly issued a residents who should not "Ask Ginger.She knows it all," Moore have said that Stagecoach statement: "All of this nonsense have voted" Huntress said. "I'm not going to Hills residents should not have rtust stop now,because the unani- —Amen answer any questions about any- been allowed to vote because tftous court of appeals has made Westlake alderman thing right now. I'm not going to their subdivision was improperly indisputable that Scott Bradley is comment at all." annexed in 1995. not the mayor of Westlake." But at last night's meeting, "The election was primarily The 2nd District Court of Ap- have been locked in political corn- Huntress said that the$67,000 was made up of nonresidents who peals struck down an order by bat over Perot's plan for develop- being paid to attorneys. Asked should not have voted," Oien 1 h i s t r i c t Court Judge Bob ment of the Circle T Ranch.The why he wrote 67 checks,Huntress said."l assume there will be a le- McGrath that would have allowed aldermen supported Perot and said he had done so on the at- gitimate election somewhere Itradley to remain in office while disannexed the ranch and some of torney's advice. "I don't do any- down the road. The existing of- ke appealed his removal. their own properties from the thing without legal advice," he ficialswillmaintaintheirpositions cGrath "abused his discretion town of 250 people. said. until a legitimate election is com- p enjoining proceedings con- The fight spilled over into a dis- He said the board voted Friday pleted." fucted by city aldermen,"accord- pute over control of the town's to authorize paying the attorney, At the 9 p.m. meeting of the tag to the opinion signed by Jus- bank accounts. Officials in the although the motion did not spec- Board of Aldermen, Attorney hce William Brigham. Texas Comptroller's Office said ify an amount.Wood said that Fri- 'terry Morgan, representing the The ruling did not address Huntress called Tuesday and day's vote approved$50,000 to his new aldermen,asked that they be dome issues that Bradley raised asked that money be wired to the firm plus $10,000 for a retainer. allowed to take their seats on the ;because they'are not properly town's checking account. Another $15,000 was authorized board. The board ignored him. • *efore us in this mandamus pro- "Mr. Huntress called and said to another attorney,he said. Another man,who said he repre- deeding,"it states, he wanted to use the touch-tone Last night, the board's agenda rented Bradshaw,announced that Bradley, who was removed system and had misplaced his PIN called for the board to"consider the new board would convene om office after a "trial" last number," said Sheila Clancy, a and take necessary action to ap- after the meeting. eek conducted by the town's spokeswoman for the comptrol- prove payments to attorneys de- The board voted, 3-1, to ap- oard of Alderman,said he will ler."We told him to fax us a letter fending the town." But no vote proved the Solana disannexation, ppeat. He has argued that the with the two authorized signa- was taken. Board members said with Held voting no.Crosswy re- uster violated his constitutional tures. no payments were necessary yes- fused to sign any papers from the ights of due process and state "He said that the other people terday. board's actions. "I'm not putting ws guaranteeing impartial judg- were out of the office and he Oien and Dudley said earlier my name on any of this,"she said. needed to pay some bills,"Clancy that they were not familiar with Staff writers Swan Gill Vardon. "If they had allowed Judge added. the fund transfers and checks to and Carol Lewis contributed to this th'storder to stay in effect, Clancy said TexPool officials the attorney. report. _, .0 Westlake e.,-;.,,,',4--,' :' vote cedes 470 acres Action not valid, ousted mayor says By Joy Dickinson Northern rarest ammo!The Das Van*Novi Northern WEE — The board of al- dermen disannexed 9S percent of the town's tax base Thursday night, Op ceding its portion of the 900-acre Solana business complex to neigh- boring Southlake. 1 Or it didn't. It all depends on which board of a aldermen is actuallymilk town—the one that ousted Mayor the Scott Bradley and voted to disannex 70 percent of the town last week,or- r the one led by Mr. Bradley that . or includes two newly elected alder- men who support his attempts to preserve the town. According to a Thursday court ; •� ruling, the first group has won — but Mr. Bradley said he plans to take the matter to the Texas Su- preme Court early next week. The old board voted 4-1 Thurs- day night to disannex Solana,leav- ing Westlake with about 400 acres ob — less than 10 percent of what it d had a week ago. Nearly all of its residents live in the remaining 400 A acres. The action was the board's last , �ry/ CY official act, as it plans to swear in �J f the newly elected aldermen on Fri- day. "Men without honor," Westlake resident John Douglas shouted af- ter the vote, receiving loud ap11 - plause from the audience of about 40. Westlake's action regarding So- lana was followed by a special City Council meeting in Southlake, where the council voted unani- mously to accept the Solana proper- Please see WESTLAKE on Page SSA. NEWS CLIPPGNG r\ So ur c e: 1 j tALC I ti/14 r,e,/ Date: g !I- ., IPhoto by StoOt .-4-:!{''' '-4'.. --::44 4 * ' Pl'It` : '-:'''..,4..';•,.-.,-‘4-:t ,;- -t,1 .:4- ..- . -: L.t.--,;-,:"...:114* 2 !, ,,,i` .iiii . . • il . 14:„,,..., , Y ..*,0. " tt °.- -44,.--,,,c' 0--1, 0:''': ' 4. - ;- .,,..'. '.---,-- •' 'hid ..*- ,, ,„,...' . .., , 4-4 e ahN 1., .....77,... „it: :x. ..0 ?-1. -..„,44';,,: <; i ",,,, "• ', , .. . ,i; ..",Nr...:,t1..,-. = i , i. „ :...if '.4 'r; •'f', ''''''Cl' '''°' -• 4„,„. ir, ... . -.. "'' ' Ai,''..:,t 't ' ' .4 ' ( ' t''!' s A, r --- ..- 4% ' ..,„. tie...1415', k'','• itc* , ,,,,fr,olv C. , ., , :-. r.*. n . •• ,. , s , , .,,, j, `,-* k .. -e*. I.: *^% ..,., -fr° , "" ....... **. • 1'4,'`: " ir .....-- - 1414"4"—',-• r • .. ,. 4 ga•''..s 1 %-...'tiffe'' ' ' ' /*''''i -',I.) ' • .- a --,.. *if ' -f.t.:..;--' - ''' ,.. : '''' - -- • - : ''S ' • ,,, ,. - ''. -,' f . .,.. ,4 ,.. _ ,.,...„.„..,,, , ,: „, ,,,,, .,,,„....,.... ."*,°' ........4.........: tfr I - .,, , % ; ' ' - "«..' ''•,, 4 .7.'''' —.t'! :+: .' ii A. .i'l't I • '''''''''), e ' ' i '" ir "'''', • ,.',.'' ' 7.. ....4 .%14-;.".' fri :47:* I ‘, ...... ( • ' ',../..-> 1 ...,,- " t g'"_, t--, , ,,,, • , , - / 0 _= , ix1-1-49 - .t . ,•4 I . •, 4V,S, . * t -1, I i 7 71 1::: .. • ". I V ,''''',4,,..N6 _ ,-' ... .•,.. , ..,... < '1' 3 .. .,}. 4 „. 4:-il- - $ , - :"„,...._ - ' P1,-,A .I 1 - 0+,1, , •, i!.., , :-. . ... . . . ' -ftsile-o4 Mayor Rick Stacy helps Amy Stefanko along during the benefit walk held to assist her tarn medical costs. About$20,000 was raised during the event. -,.. I - Community walks for Amy 1 by Ryan S. Otto 1 cials as targets were part of the didn't officially began nntii,--- I Hundreds of Southlake resi- festivities. noon, one particular group , dents converged upon Bicen- "We probably had at least individuals, including ,l!"1:,• ,,,C.- tennial Park last Saturday to 5,000 people come and go all Modano of the DallasS,.. ,::::-_:'°! enjoy the warm weather, Little day"said Tracy Southers,pub- newly re-elected may. League baseball and the city's lic information officer for the Stacy,showed up a unto 40th anniversary celebration, city of Southlake."The weather The group met at 10 a.m.71-;,,, 1 1 Food, clowns and even a was perfect." the White's Chapel entrance fi dunking booth with city offi- And although the festival (see "Walk,"page 1 • cv-e,r r from Austin, brought Amy home But the Southlake "Walk for donated the profits from the foo 'alk last week from rehabilitation at Amy," which was held to raise to the"Walk for Amy"fund." 5 -I page Cooks Children's Medical Center funds for the Stefanko family's The Southlake Boy Scouts, a i ,ark to participate ate in a "Walk in Fort Worth. medical bills, is not the only well as Wal-Mart and Home Dt it p p ro ect designed to help. Other pot, were some of the $ \mv" which benefited Amy Despite doctors' speculation that w organiz:alks and charity drives have tions that made large contribI intro. Amy would not walk or talk again, ko now S bean she has done both in the last month raised money for the family as tions. Home 000 Depot, of material fact,o & rig le4,Stefanko, g well. nated $ ing leukemia. and a half. .ring the last year,the Durham "She took her steps about three In the next week,the local walk make the Stefanko home whee I nentary School student has weeks ago,"said Elizabeth Fawks, organizers plan to gather donation chair-accessible. ; ,red a series of medical diffi- an organizer of the event and wife jars from Southlake businesses and Donations to the family can E les,which through March have of the councilman. move them to Arlington, where sent to Texas National Bank,P.( - it;ht her total bills to more than Her son is in Stefanko's class at relatives of the Stefankos are ar- Box 92840, Southlake, Tex s 0,000. A brain aneurysm, Durham Elementary, and she met ranging another drive. 76092 in care of the Amy Stefank i ch resulted in emergency sur- Amy last fall just before the "This has definitely been a Benefit Fund. : and caused Amy to suffer a youngster was hospitalized. group effort," Elizabeth Fawks es of strokes, accounts for And Elizabeth Fawks,who vol- said. ,y of the most recent expenses. unteers once a week at Durham, Citizens of Southlake were en- ut in March, despite all the was only one of many event sup- couraged to find sponsors or to '..cal problems,Amy spoke her ports. sponsor themselves or their fami- words since October of 1996. "It was about eight ladies who lies and participate in the walk. e• le his is grass roots support," decided to put this together," she But well after the race, people City Councilman Gary Fawks said:"We are total amateurs. were still handing in it cFund.sr the esti- r to the charity walk. Nevertheless, the group Amy Stefanko Benef he Stefanko family, who mates that well over S20,000 was After selling hot dogs and ham- ' ed to Southlake four years ago raised at the event. burgers most of the day, Kroger Photo by Staci Otto 1 mot. kx S iMnK m N0 5 i • ‘k.•=-: \ lk; ' :4 i t�O• Y T ice "'': Illi -kt. mow: _ -,,,:-,.. A A , ....,....A.000—...;._;; 1 : .4 ,,.,..,, 4 of i V tephanie Strangis, Ralph Strangis, Kern Nelson, Ralph Stefanko Nicolas Stefanko, Alex Stefanko, Trisha 11 tefanko(back row), Savanah Strangis, Amy Stefanko and Mike Modano at the benefit walk. NEWS CLIPPING � r ��Source: `� � - , - - - Date: 5 49'7 Medical group given constructiongo-ahead • by Ryan S. Ono erty. Medical Air Services Associa- To accommodate privacy corn- Lion received approval from the plaints, it was agreed that the bal- Southlake City Council on Tues- cony on the second floor of the day to build its company headquar- north side of the building would ters on Southlake Boulevard. be enclosed.Also,the windows on "It's finally over," said Tim the same side would be eliminated, Green, president of Medical Air frosted or raised so that a 6-foot Services Association. tall person could not see out. The property,located at 1302 W. In an attempt to eliminate the Southlake Blvd., approximately building's obtrusiveness,the inte- 390 feet east of the intersection of nor was reduced to approximately South Ridge Lakes Parkway and 9,997 square feet and its exterior 1 West Southlake Boulevard, has height was limited to 35 feet, been owned and occupied by Jerry which is shorter than the tallest Black and his family for about 25 home in the neighboring commu- years. nity. ` I m ` Medical Air Services Associa- And although the applicant corn- now plans to purchase the plied with numerous requests from newly re-zoned land from the both the City Council and the Plan- Black family and construct a$wo- ning and Zoning Commission, story office building. new and steadfast opposition to the Prior to the approval of the site development from Southlake resi- II plan district zoning request, the dents continued to surface. land was zoned as an agricultural "I am still concerned with the district. enormity of the building," said In February, during early re- Mary Fitzpatrick. '� views of the re-zoning and site Other residents expressed con- plan application,the Planning and cerns that a commercial develop- Zoning Commission narrowly ap- ment on Black's property would proved the project in a 4 to 3 vote. decrease the land value of adjacent At that time, much of the oppo- property and begin eliminating the sition to the project was focused rural appeal of Southlake. . on issues of privacy, landscaping "We will soon become like Col- ` requirements and the building's � leyville or Plano or one of the other obtrusiveness to neighboring resi- cities that most of us left to come (see "Council,"page 3� Q'v' A/) dents on the north side of the prop- (,/C F Council their hearts. highway,"said Larry Flynn,'presi- "Personal consideration to an dent of the Southlake Chamber of from page 1 individual should not supersede to a place like Southlake," Bill what isgood for entire commu- Commerce. "Anyone opposed to this development should honestly Leary said. nity," Richard Ponder said. ask themselves if they would build In recent weeks, several resi- Members of the council were a home on the land. dents opposed to the development quick to defend themselves and the "This is the most unobtrusive ' became increasingly concerned statements they had made. development this, land could that members of the City Council "I apologize if my inarticulation have." had voted to approve the first read- has caused a misunderstanding City Councilman Scott Martin ing of the application strictly based about this development,"Council- pointed out that the land use cat- on emotional reasoning. man Wayne Moffat said. "I hon- egory for the property states that "Compassion toward the Black estly believe the application it "may include low-intensity of- family and their desire to sell their speaks for itself." fice and/or retail uses." land is.admirable but not appro- Many residents, citing that this "Everyone wants to preserve the priate," Leary said in the public development is inconsistent with rural and stop the development," hearing on the application. the corridor overlay and land use Martin said. "We can't stop the 'According to one Southlake resi- categories,requested that the land development of property without dent,at least two council members be used as residential. reason." admitted to voting according to "This land is fronting a five-lane NEWS CLIPPING Source: ‹lit(YL Date: VJ 901 i Conversant phone system goes `live' News and Times To hear the latest city informa tion,24 hours a day,7 days a week, just dial the city number, 481- 5581.After the greeting,you will L be offered selections starting with - j the number 1 for a list of city meet- ! ings The menu tree will direct you to specific information such as how to register for recreation programs, . facility reservations and closings i due to inclement weather.Within the larger departments such as Public Works,you will be able to get to specific divisions such as 1 engineering,water, code enforce- ment, inspection and administra- tion. This new system should make it -fs0 "Phone,"page 3. 1 Phone from page 1 - l - easier for residents to get directly l l to the information they are seek- ing. SPIN information will be found under the number(1)for meetings and also under number(9)for ad- ministrative offices. 1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 16, 1997 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting May 20, 1997 1. Agenda Item No. 4B, City Manager's Report. Included in your packet is the Financial Report for the period ended April 30, 1997. Also note the "Appraised Property Value Analysis" report prepared by Lou Ann Heath, Finance Director, based upon Tarrant County Appraisal District's preliminary report for 1997. Lou Ann's report is based on net taxable value, not market value as reported in the area newspapers, thus the difference in numbers. Net taxable value is the value meaningful to our budget process. Note the preliminary numbers show a 4.84% increase in value for existing property, and $200,355,207 in new construction. The total value is estimated at $1,573,208,532. This results in a 20.14% change in values compared to the previous year's September 1 (final) value. We will receive a certified roll on July 25, which will then be incorporated into our budget. FYI, our permit records indicate that 87% or the $200 million in new construction value is from residential construction ($173.48 million residential; $26.35 million commercial). If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Lou Ann at ext. 716. 2. Agenda Item No. 4C. SPIN Report. Laura Miklosko, SPIN Representative for Neighborhood #9, will make this presentation. We anticipate that she will focus many of her comments on the issue of Metro Pool Chemical. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Page 2 Regarding Metro Pool Chemicals, staff has completed the study of the situation and is finalizing recommendations to be presented to you by the June 17 City Council meeting. We will also be discussing this issue along with the general question of amortization with our attorneys during the retreat. Should you receive any calls from the Timarron neighborhood prior to the retreat, it would be appropriate to respond that we recognize the problem and will very shortly have a plan of action to follow. 3. Agenda Item No. 4D. Park and Recreation Board Report. Carol Lee Hamilton will be present to provide you with a brief update on Park Board activities. Le 4. Agenda Item No. 5A. ZA 97-50. Preliminary Plat for Rucker's Hacienda De Gusto. There are no unresolved issues related to this request. It has been placed on the consent agenda for this reason. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 subject to the Plat Review Summary. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough regarding this request. 5. Agenda Item No. 5B. Resolution No. 97-39 additional third Regular City Council meetings. We have placed this item on your agenda in order to enable us to take final action on the Solana annexation as quickly as possible as requested by the Partnership which owns Solana. We are taking this action upon the advice of our attorney,•which we will discuss in Executive Session. Note we still have the public hearings scheduled for May 26 and May 27 for another annexation ordinance that will be considered by City Council on June 17 (1st reading) and July 1 (2nd reading). 6. Agenda Item No. 7A. Ordinance No. 675. 2nd Reading. Granting consent to the assignment and transfer of cable television system and franchise from Harron Cablevision Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest Li May 16, 1997 Page 3 to Marcus Cable. This item has been left on the agenda, but there is a strong possibility that we will bring you something different on Tuesday. As noted in the memo from Kevin Human. Community Services Manager, there are several items we have asked be included into the franchise agreement with Marcus before we transfer operation of the system from Harron to Marcus. We have a meeting with Marcus and Harron representatives on Monday, May 19, and they have indicated that they see no problem with adding these items. 7. Agenda Item No. 7B. ZA 97-032, Site Plan for TETCO. There have been many meetings and discussions regarding this request. We feel that all issues have been worked through as directed by Council for your consideration. There are three (3) issues related to this request: (1) the site plan (97-032); (2) sign variance request (next agenda item); (3) developer's agreement addressing fiscal issues (agenda item no. 7D). The applicant has made considerable changes in their site plan as shown on the new submittal. The previous submittal to City Council is included in the packet behind the Staff Report while the revised site plan under consideration at this time is attached behind the Site Plan Review Summary. The applicant has elected to shift their site plan back twelve feet (12'), and provide ROW for a deceleration lane into their development and continuation of the free- right-turn lane up to Peytonville. The applicant has worked in good faith to resolve the concerns raised by Council. Feel free to contact me, Bob Whitehead, or Greg Last regarding any of the issues related to the site plan or discussions leading to the revisions as proposed. 8. Agenda Item No. 7C. Requested variance to Sign Ordinance No. 506-B for TETCO Gas Station/Convenience Store. The sign ordinance, as you know, prohibits readerboard signs Car unless a variance is granted by City Council. The applicant is requesting this variance in order to display the prices of their gasoline product. They are proposing a monument sign which is less area than allowed. The memo from Bob Whitehead describes their request in detail and provides exhibits of the requested signage. This is the only variance they are Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest cop., May 16, 1997 Page 4 seeking. The packet items include TETCO's demonstration of hardship and their elevation of the proposed sign. Recognizing City Council's previous position statements regarding readerboard signs, the question revolves around the traditional need of service stations to display their fuel prices, and the convenience to the motoring public that may stop to make a fuel purchase. Feel free to contact me, Greg, or Bob if you have any questions. 9. Agenda Item No. 7D. Commercial Developer Agreement for TETCO. This developer's agreement was put together for your immediate consideration as a result of our recent "negotiations" with TETCO. As noted in the memo from Public Works Director Bob Whitehead, there are many areas where this agreement differs from the City's standard agreements. Of primary importance is the agreement to share costs for the construction of the deceleration lane. We believe that this agreement is favorable to the City, given the circumstances in which we arrived at this agreement. As you know, we have nothing formal through which to legally require this of the developer, but he has agreed to work with us. Please direct any questions you may have to Bob. 10. Agenda Item No. 7E. 2nd Reading Ordinance No. 480-221. ZA 96-131. Rezoning and Concept Plan for Timarron Commercial. Tract II. The information submitted for your review has been revised since Council approval of the first reading (7-0). All items as discussed by Council have been included in the revised submission, however, items 10, 11, & 12 (pg. 7E-6 in your packet) as noted in the Staff Report were somewhat less quantitative/objective and Council may need to clarify your intention/direction regarding those items. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough regarding this item. 11. Agenda Item No. 7F. 2nd Reading Ordinance No. 480-236. ZA 97-013. Rezoning and Site Plan for Antioch Church and Ministries. There have been no changes in this Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Page 5 application since Council's approval of the first reading by consent (7-0). The only issue we are aware of that the applicant may want to address is the need to remove a concrete slab that exists on the property. It is staffs understanding that it is their intent to remove the slab, but that they do not have the funds to remove it with their first phase of construction. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough regarding this item. 12. Agenda Item No. 7G. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-237, ZA 97-019, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Harrell Place. The applicant has made the revisions to the lotting as recommended by Council, reducing the number of lots to six (6). Note that the five (5) southernmost lots have areas sufficient to be zoned in the SF1 categories if that is your desire. The north lot would still have to be rezoned SF30 in order to conform with our Lye Zoning Ordinance. Staff will have available at the meeting alternate ordinance language should the Council desire to adopt different zoning for different lots as discussed at your previous meeting. For your reference, the minimum house sizes in the various districts are as follows: SF1A - Minimum 2,000 s.f. SF1B - 1,500 s.f. SF30 - 1,800 s.f. (there is no A and B breakdown in this district). Recall there is a supermajority vote required for approval due to the recommendation for denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough if you have any questions regarding this item. 13. Agenda Item No. 7H. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-240, ZA 97-017, Rezoning of 1966 East Dove Road. There have been no changes in this request since Council approval by consent 7-0. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough or Karen Gandy regarding this request. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Page 6 14. Agenda Item No. 7I. ZA 97-046. Site Plan for Texas Commerce Bank. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. This request was heard at the P&Z rollover meeting yesterday evening (5/16/97) so there was not an opportunity to submit and review revised plans. The plans in your packet and the accompanying review are the same as approved by P&Z (7-0). Note that the plans do not show a night drop box drive along the south side of the building which was approved by P&Z, however there is a Xerox (mark- up) of the proposed drive included in your packet. Feel free to contact Greg Last or Dennis Killough regarding this request. 15. Agenda Item No. 7J. 2nd Reading Ordinance No. 480-238. ZA 96-159. Rezoning of approximately 43.696 acres reduced to 29.51 acres, from AG to I-1. Crooked Lane. There have been no changes in this request since Council's approval of the first reading 6-1. The packets were copied before we had the opportunity to include the preliminary plat references, but we have attached them to this memo. This includes both the originally submitted preliminary plat and the revised preliminary plat. The Mayor and Greg Last have had discussions with Trammel Crow representatives regarding road connections. They are considering the issue. It is my understanding that we may know more on this issue prior to Tuesday's meeting. Recall there is a requirement for a supermajority vote due to the recommendation for denial by P&Z. Please feel free to contact Greg Last or Karen Gandy regarding this item. 16. Agenda Item No. 7K. 2nd Reading Ordinance No. 480-239. ZA 97-028, Rezoning of approximately 8.55 acres, from AG to 01. Crooked Lane. There have been no changes in this request since Council approval of the first reading 7-0. 17. Agenda Item No. 8A. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 480-244. ZA 97-047, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Commerce Square. This item was heard at the P&Z rollover meeting last night, 5/16/97. There are three (3) total items related to this request, this item and the next two, both of which are Specific Use Permits. You may recall that a similar Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest L. May 16, 1997 Page 7 request was reviewed and approved on this property in the past six months. We have included in the packet the previously approved plan as well as the plan proposed with this submission. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 with the recommendations noted in the Staff Report. 18. Agenda Item No. 8B. Resolution No. 97-37. ZA 97-048, Specific Use Permit for outside storage of recreational vehicles. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 with the recommendations noted in the Staff Report. 19. Agenda Item No. 8C. Resolution No. 97-38, ZA 97-049, Specific Use Permit for a Lpe residential unit for a night watchman or caretaker. SUP for a residential unit for a night watchman or caretaker. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 with the recommendations noted in the Staff Report. 20. Agenda Item No. 8D. THIS ITEM LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. 21. Agenda Item No. 8E. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 480-242, ZA 97-044. Rezoning of approximately 4.00 acres, from AG to SF-1A. Lilac Lane. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. 22. Agenda Item No. 8F. ZA 97-045. Plat Showing of Lots 5 and 6. O.W. Knight Survey. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. L••••• 23. Agenda Item No. 8G. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 483-F. Revisions to the Park Dedication provisions. The draft ordinance included in your packet includes recommendations from the Park Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest Le, May 16, 1997 Page 8 City Attorney as referenced in the memo from Chris Carpenter. We felt it was best to try to graphically show all recommendations in one draft so that they may be considered at the same time rather than giving you three separate recommendations for the ordinance. The main differences in the recommendations from the Park Board and P&Z are in two areas: first, regarding credits for private parks, the Park Board recommends that there not be any credit allowed for these types of parks and P&Z recommends that the existing maximum credit of 50% be continued; second, regarding the ratios for land dedication, the Park Board recommends doubling the requirements for both residential and commercial properties while the P&Z recommends leaving the ratios as they currently exist, with the recommendation that the Council reevaluate the methods for determining the cost of acquiring parkland which all the multipliers are based on. Feel free to contact Kim Lenoir, Chris Carpenter, or Greg Last regarding this item. 24. Agenda Item No. 8H. Ordinance No. 676, 1st Reading, annexation of Solana The placement of these items on the agenda will undoubtedly cause confusion by the news media and others, and it is not the intent of this memo to provide details to answer all questions. Essentially, we are moving forward with the public hearings scheduled for May 26 and 27, but we are "fast tracking" the annexation process. Procedurally, we should hold public hearings prior to annexation, however, this procedure does not envision annexation of a single property owner. Maguire Partners has petitioned us to waive the public hearing and immediately proceed. We plan to accommodate this request.. In order to pass the ordinance on two readings, prior to June 1, we will need to call a third regular meeting in May, which is allowed under the Charter as discussed hereinabove. Specific details will be provided to you in Executive Session. 25. Agenda Item No. 10A. Possible Special Election for August 9. 1997. As you know, we g P g have planned to discuss the Crime Control and Prevention District with you for several meetings; the sheer volume of items on our agendas have precluded us from doing so. We Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Page 9 are at the point where we feel we must discuss this with Council in order to meet the schedule for an August 9 election. In fact, we plan to bring the plan and budget to you at the additional regular meeting we are planning in May or for the first meeting in June to ensure that you can fully deliberate the issues and feel comfortable calling the election. FYI, there is a new angle to this issue. Apparently Senator Mike Moncrief introduced legislation this session (SB 1401) which would allow the same cities authorized to pass Crime Control and Prevention Districts to pass Fire Protection and Crime Control and Prevention Districts. This legislation would more completely suit our needs, given our DPS environment. Our biggest concern is the delay in pursuing needed facilities that could be caused if we wait for this opportunity. We are monitoring the legislature's activity on this issue and hope to be in a position to discuss this with you on Tuesday evening. 26. Agenda Item No. 10B. We received a schedule from the State for the August 9 election, which will requires to move forward with ballot items quickly. One of the items we plan to pursue, as you are well aware, are "clean up" Charter revisions. We also need to address the requirement that we "read" the preamble to ordinances. Also, we need to look at specifics concerning the Park and Recreation Board and whether or not it should be a Charter-provided board. It is my "feel" that it should be, however, it needs to be understood that issues pertaining to planning, such as subdivision regulations (park dedication fees, etc.), should remain with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Ultimately, this issue needs to be looked at and recommended to City Council for placement on the ballot. Charter elections are governed by Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code. The Charter has been amended twice since it was adopted in 1987, 1st in January 1991 and again in January 1995. Should City Council want to pursue amending the Charter, the Council can decide to appoint a Charter Review Committee made up of various members of the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Page 10 community or decide on its own to submit proposed amendments to the voters. In our two previous Charter amendment elections, one election involved recommendations of the Charter Review Committee appointed by City Council, the other involved a City Council Committee that reviewed the proposed Charter amendments and made the recommendation to the full Council. Councilmember Evans served on both committees, that is, the review committee for both the previous Charter amendment elections. Councilmember Evans also served on the Charter Commission that drafted the original Charter. This item is on your agenda to allow you to appoint Councilmembers to serve as the Charter Review Committee. The committee would review the charter, make recommendations to Council, and the City Council would vote to place the items on the (kw ballot. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 27. June Retreat. Mark your calendar for the June Retreat scheduled for June 10 & 11 at the Solana Education Center. We plan to kick things off on Monday around 4:00 p.m. and finish the evening with a joint meeting between the City Council and the CISD Board of Trustees. Day two of the retreat will be full, probably beginning at 8:30 a.m. We will be getting you a detailed agenda and packet of information soon. • 28. Joint Meeting with CISD Board of Trustees. We plan to begin this portion of the Retreat around 6:30 p.m., with dinner served. Staff is planning another joint CISD/COS staff meeting for May 21, at which time we will discuss the agenda for your meeting. If you have items you would like to have included on the agenda for the Joint meeting in addition to discuss joint use potential school sites, etc, please let me or Shana Yelverton know. (This also holds for the Retreat in general.) • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest [ May 16, 1997 NIP' Page 11 29. Karen Cienki Letter. Attached you will find a letter from Ms. Cienki regarding an unsupervised child at Bicentennial Park. Although we share her concern, in reality, there was little that could be done. Teddi Zonker, administrative secretary with Parks and Recreation, reported that the child's mother was in the Lodge and claimed she was watching the child. This letter was discussed at Monday's Park Board meeting, and the group unanimously concurred that it was not an issue over which they had any control or "jurisdiction." 30. Diesel Fuel Spill. Attached to this memo you will find a memo from Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety, describing a recent incident involving fuel spillage at the Pumpco facility on South Kimball. You will note that the Texas Natural Resource (lior Conservation Commission (TNRCC) was involved in the issue. 31. Recreation Programming. I have recently received questions regarding the process used by the Parks and Recreation Department to develop. implement and monitor the quality of the recreation programs we offer to Southlake residents. The attached document called "Success Strategies: Recreation Management Program," documents the process currently followed by staff. This process was developed a couple of years ago, with Park Board review in August 1995. Councilmember Michael Richarme provided input into this system at the time. Essentially, the process was developed to promote strong program planning and evaluation. It is an element of the department's customer service program. A review of the attached will provide you with a feel of the process staff follows. Note that survey cards are distributed at the end of each program, and 100% of the class participants are (kir asked to respond to questions regarding the class, equipment, facilities, registration, etc. These cards are returned to Shana Yelverton for initial review and then forwarded to Parks and Recreation with follow up instructions as needed. According to Victor DeSantis with the Survey Research Center, a 10% response rate is considered acceptable for making Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest LMay 16, 1997 Page 12 assumptions about the program when surveys are presented to 100% of the participants. A 25% or higher response rate is considered excellent. During the summer of 1996, 30% of all surveys handed out were returned with an overall class satisfaction rating of 4.7 out of a possible 5.0 rating. Recently, a Park Board member raised questions about how programs were planned, how quality was monitored, and how revenues were generated. It was determined that the Park Board recreation liaisons should review "Success Strategies" and discuss several philosophical questions, such as: - How do we determine which classes should be offered? Who are we trying (Nor to serve and how? - What is our revenue philosophy? - How do we determine the quality of the programs provided? - What other refinements are necessary to continue to build a strong recreational program? The liaisons will be meeting next week, and will craft recommendations which will go to the full Park Board. If you have any questions about this issue, please contact Shana Yelverton. 32. Park Board Meeting/Council Follow Up Issues. The Park Board addressed several key issues at their Monday meeting, and the minutes included in your packet document those. A few of the highlights are noted below: ✓KSB Waterscape Project - In 1995, KSB developed a wildflower and wildscape demonstration project in Bicentennial Park. Since that time, they have been attempting to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Now" Page 13 complete another phase of this project which is a waterscape. KSB has been actively seeking funds for this project since July 1995. They recently approached the Park Board and SPDC seeking matching funds for $8,095 to complete the project. On April 14 the Park Board made the recommendation that the SPDC match the $8,095. This recommendation was based on recognition of KSB's willingness to make cash and in- kind donations up to $8,095. There was much discussion by the Park Board regarding the appropriateness and practicality of accepting in-kind donations for matching. On April 21 the SPDC discussed the issue. The majority of the SPDC members expressed their strong belief that the matching funds included in the SPDC budget were included to be cash, or dollar-for-dollar matches. They suggested that groups could always seek additional funds through the regular project approval process. They also noted that they believed it was appropriate for the Park Board to allocate up to $5,000 for a cash match on their own, recognizing that the SPDC would be required to make a final approval given their fiduciary responsibility for the funds. On May 11 the Park Board granted a $5,000 cash match for the project (dollar-for-dollar). Although there was much discussion about the possibility of approaching the SPDC for additional funds for the project, no such motion was ever made. It appeared that several Park Board members preferred that KSB raise the additional funds needed through other sources. Playground Management Issues - Two major issues were discussed with the Board regarding the playgrounds at Bicentennial Park. Staff has received numerous requests to light Adventure Alley. The Board rejected this idea for safety reasons, but suggested that the staff place signage at the playground noting that it closes at dark. The other issue relates to the playground located near the community center. As you know, the playground is dated and as such, does not meet current safety specifications. The Board was in favor of removing this playground as soon as possible, and hopes to properly install Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest cia.„, May 16, 1997 Page 14 new, safe equipment soon. Recognizing that this area is master planned for a ballfield, staff will be looking at some alternatives, including a different location, or equipment which can be moved when necessary. 33. Soccer Field Complaint. Attached you will find a letter from Janet Murphy, expressing frustration over the city's lack of soccer fields and lack of commitment to build fields. I will be preparing a response to send to Ms. Murphy. In the meantime, I think it is important to note that the city added five soccer fields during the expansion of Bicentennial Park, and is planning to have another 11 open for fall of 1998 at Bob Jones Park. We may also have some joint use opportunities with Keller ISD, but we are not yet at a point to specifically describe these possibilities. The school had planned to build soccer fields on the northern end of the Durham tract, but no irrigation was installed and the grading is rough. We have heard that Eddie Cheatham has been asked to review drainage for the entire site, and he may be able to help alleviate some of the water problems which prevent play. However, keep in mind that the area was always intended to be a drainage detention area. It is interesting to note that the Park staff had a budget planning meeting and invited all the youth sports associations to provide input. John Levitt with the Grapevine Southlake Soccer Association told Kathy Schaeffer that no one was able to attend, but they were satisfied since we are moving forward with the 11 fields at Bob Jones Park. . In short, staff, the SPDC, and the Park Board are well aware of the demand and our inability to completely meet it. However, we are making efforts to work toward more adequate facilities. 34. TIF Update. Lou Ann Heath is currently in the process of preparing a draft of the preliminary financing plan, which will be reviewed by the staff and First Southwest Company. A legal description and map has been prepared, defusing the district. We plan • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Page 15 to bring the item to you during the third (additional regular meeting to be considered Tuesday night) meeting in May. 35. Clean Cities 2000/NCTCOG Grants. We are currently applying to the TNRCC to obtain Clean City 2000 status. The Clean Cities program recognizes local governments that voluntarily develop comprehensive environmental programs that contribute to the Clean Texas 2000 goals of reducing solid waste disposal. Southlake has a number of programs which are currently in place, some that may be expanded, and others which are being considered that would make us a strong candidate. The Clean Cities 2000 designation is often used as a selection criteria in grant applications. (lire Almost all grants administered by NCTCOG give some special consideration to recognized Clean Cities. The city is planning to apply for several grants from NCTCOG and feel this attribute will assist in our grant application process. 36. June Retreat Issues. We are working on putting together the agenda for the June Retreat. In addition to reviewing things such as public works/capital improvements projects, other budget issues, etc., the following are some issues you should anticipate regarding the upcoming retreat. 1. Economic Development Survey: The economic development staff is preparing a three-ring bound reference of recent research regarding various economic development issues in the city. This reference book will be handed out at your meeting next Tuesday along with a "Survey of Economic Development Priorities" for Council to fill out and return by Friday, May 23rd. We want to get your Nor feedback on these issues prior to the June retreat so that we can summarize the results of the survey and talk about the direction of economic development at the retreat. If you have any questions regarding this process, feel free to contact Kate Barlow, Economic Development Coordinator (ext. 776) or Greg Last. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Page 16 2. City Initiated Zonings: We intend to discuss a variety of issues related to the city initiated rezonings. This would include the first phase of rezonings which have been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as the longer list as previously disseminated. Recall that we have withdrawn the four (4) areas of rezoning which were recommended for denial by the P&Z and there is one case (SouthRidge Lakes) which is still pending. If you have particular zoning areas you would like to cover, please let me, Shana, or Karen know in the next few days. 3. Amortizations: We intend to discuss a variety of issues related to potential amortization of uses in the city. Feel free to contact me, Shana or Karen if you have particular issues regarding this topic. (bp, 37. Ordinance No. 480-Y. Personal Care Facilities (assisted living facilities). The Planning and Zoning Commission is intending to review this ordinance at their meeting on 5/22/97. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy regarding information on the status of this ordinance. 38. Ordinance No. 483-G. Subdivision Ordinance. Miscellaneous Items. The Planning and Zoning Commission did approve these revisions at their rollover meeting on 5/15/97 by a vote of 7-0. The first reading of this ordinance did not make this meeting but will be on your next agenda; staff has not had the opportunity to make the recommended changes and place the revisions in ordinance format. Feel free to contact Greg Last if you have any questions regarding this item. 39. Update on Senior Activities. At its most recent meeting on May 13, the Senior Advisory Commission elected new officers. Dick Johnston was re-appointed as Chairman, Martha Greenberg as Vice-Chairman, and Aloha Payne as Secretary. The Senior Advisory Commission is currently focusing on a variety of issues and activities. They are very interested in getting involved with various Tarrant County programs, including the Northeast Tarrant County Senior Issues Committee and the Metropolitan Tarrant County Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest L., May 16, 1997 Page 17 Agency on Aging. They hope to provide Southlake with representation on these county- wide programs related to seniors. The Senior Advisory Commission is also very interested in the current zoning ordinance revisions pertaining to assisted living facilities. The Senior Advisory Commission and city staff are proceeding with the renovation of the Eubank's house as a Senior Activity Center. There were two public meetings held last week to obtain input from citizens regarding the actual facility needs and a prioritization of those needs. We will begin developing construction plans soon. 40. Status of Hiring a Landscape Administrator. We intend to make an offer next week for the position of Landscape Administrator. As you know, Kim Lenoir and Greg Last have (kw been interviewing for many months, but have finally found an applicant they believe meets the criteria we have established fro this new position. Greg., Kim, and Bob Whitehead have also been interviewing candidates for the Park Project Superintendent position. An offer will be made next week to fill this position as well. We will update you when the new people are on board. 41. Appeal of Condemnation by Brunsons. As we expected, the Brunsons have filed an objection to the award of the Special Commissioners in regards to the City's condemnation lawsuit. We will discuss their claims with you in executive session. 42. Hopefully you received the alpa page concerning the Texas Supreme Court decision regarding the appeal made by Scott Bradley in Westlake. We will not receive the exact details of the Court's denial of Bradley's appeal until sometime Monday. We will let you Lar• know as soon as we receive it. 43. Public Works FYI. Public Works will be having an Open House at their facility on Wednesday, May 21 from 2:00 - 7:00 p.m., to celebrate Public Works week. You will Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 16, 1997 Page 18 also be receiving an invitation to attend a barbecue lunch hosted by the Public Works department on Friday, May 23, from 11:00 - 1:00 p.m. Hope to see you there! Also, if you are interested in seeing the new water tank on Pearson Lane, Walter Shore, Construction Inspector, has offered to give tours. He has even offered to come in on a Saturday if you would like to take your family when there is no construction going on. Please call Walter at 481-5581, extension 784, to arrange a time with him. 44. Also included in your packet: Revised Community Profile. The Profile includes for maps (provided by Public Works/GIS), is produced entirely in-house which allows staff to maintain current (tame information, and is a combination of previous Profiles and the Supplemental Economic Development Information packet. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact Economic Development Coordinator Kate Barlow at ext. 776. Attached to my memo is: (1) a copy of the Notice of Public Meeting SH 114 Major Investment Study from LP 382 to Dallas County Line; and, (2) the March 1997 report from the Northeast Transportation Service (NETS). To: David Baltimore, SPIN Standing Committee Chairperson From: Janet Murphy, SPIN#4 Representative Date: May 14, 1997 RE: May 15, 1997 SPIN meeting jointly with City Council It is with sincere regret and apologies that I must inform you that I will not be attending the May 15, 1997 SPIN Standing Committee Meeting which will be held jointly with the Southlake City Council. Although several organizations to which I belong (and serve on executive boards in most cases) have scheduled meetings and events for this particular evening, it was the SPIN meeting that I had planned to attend until I received a call late Monday evening. This call informed me that the end-of-season soccer tournament we had been anticipating for my youngest daughter has now been scheduled. My ten year old daughter and her team will be playing soccer games Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday nights this week beginning at 7:00 PM. This was not an optional tournament for any of the teams in the Grapevine- Southlake Soccer Association. The fees for this tournament were built in to the spring season. As my daughter is the chief goal keeper for her team, she doesn't feel that she can let her team down by not playing in these games. I don't feel that I can let my daughter down by not being there to offer my support for her efforts or in case of injury. (..." You're probably asking"Why is she telling me all this?" Because I continue to find it infuriating that the City of Southlake has refused to heed the plea of soccer parents in this community that the City needs to provide sufficient numbers of playing fields for our many hundreds of children involved in the GSSA soccer program. It is wrong for ten year old children to be beginning soccer games at 7:00 PM two school nights in a row. Tournament games should be held on weekends, all day Saturday with playoff games on Sunday afternoons. That's the way its done in other cities. Lack of playing fields is the reason why these week night games are necessary in Grapevine and Southiake. The City of Southiake had the opportunity to create soccer playing fields on 17 acres owned at Bob Jones Road and White Chapel Boulevard which could have been ready for play by now if a small handful of homeowners hadn't created unnecessary delay. The Park Board and City Council chose to meet the demands of this small group over the needs of a much larger segment of the population. Additional fields were to have been'ready at the Durham school site for this season. They aren't. The City just doesn't seem to have any sense of urgency where this subject is concerned. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to vent my anger about this subject. As this will be a joint meeting with Southlake's City Council, if you should happen to have the opportunity to share the reason for my absence with anyone, I would be pleased if you would do so. Eliel cc: Shana Yelverton Curtis Hawk ✓ 4-30-1997 9:33AM FROM SOUTHLAKE PARKS REC 817 421 2175 P_ 3 SUCCESS STRATEGIES Recreation Management Process Phase I Progranaloning and.Evalyation Strong program planning is a tool used to keep up with the progress of Southlake's recreation programs. It is a way of calculating the expense, income, effectiveness and customer satisfaction of all recreational programs. It is helpful in planning future events and provides a way for the Parks and Recreation Division to keep in touch with the public's wants and needs. The process serves as a checks and balance system for programs before, during, and after the event and is completely designed around customer service. The process is broken up into five different stages and every process is charted from start to finish Listed below are the five stages and descriptions of each: Planning Implementation Interim Program Post Audit Survey Completion PLANNING STAGE: Careful planning is critical to the success of a program, given the number of details that must be handled. In this stage the Instructor Checklist and Recreation Program Planning Sheet are completed. These two forms help hire instructors, design the class, and schedule facilities, They provide a checklist to ensure that staff addresses the necessary issues such as instructor's paperwork being completed, contracts being signed and consideration items being decided. Attachments A and B. IMPLEMENTATION STAGE: The Time Action Plan is completed during this stage. This is a way of documenting what tasks need to be done and who is responsible for completing each task. This serves as an excellent communication tool between staff and instructors and provides a means for documenting information for use in future years_ Attachment C. 4-30-1997 9.33AM FROM SOUThLAKE PARKS REC 817 421 217S P. 4 INTERIM STAGE: An Interim Survey will be conducted for classes lasting three or more days and will be completed at the half way point of the program.Parks and Recreation staff will call 1 0%of the class enrollment and ask basic questions about the class. This allows staff to get immediate feedback and to correct any concerns before the class is over. It also provides class participants an opportunity to express their concerns, issues, and ideas to staff prior to conclusion of the class. Attachment D. PROGRAM COMPLETION STAGE: A Customer Satisfaction Survey will be distributed at the conclusion of classes and programs. The patrons will mail back the stamped card and staff will document the information on the Post Audit Sheet. This will give the public a chance to give feedback and help staff make necessary improvements. Additionally, the ratings will provide a basis for measuring performance over time. Attachment E. POST AUDIT STAGE: The Recreation Program Post Audit form gives a detailed look at income, supplies, and participant satisfaction. This tool allows staff to evaluate planned vs. actual performance, documents aggregate customer satisfaction ratings, and creates a process through which staff evaluates the program as it relates to continuous improvement How should the program be improved? This is a question that should be asked following every program, regardless of the success experienced. Attachment F. Success Strategies, Phase I, is simply a process of documenting careful planning and evaluation efforts. Phase I will be followed with other strategies relating to revenue philosophy, and customer service programs(including complaint procedures). 4-30-1997 9:32AM FROM SOUTHLAKE PARKS REC 817 421 2175 P. 2 INSTRUCTOR CHECKLIST SOUTHLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION INSTRUCTOR: PROGRAM: DATE: Instructor application completed Planning Sheet completed Reference check completed Facility scheduled Notified instructor Instructor orientation completed Time Action Plan completed Instructor contract completed Contract signed Instructor scheduled for payment Instructor provided with Class Roster Instructor distributed evaluation cards Class roster returned Instructor assisted with Post Audit Paperwork completed for payment 4111111 Notes: Phone calls: Correspondence: 4-30-1997 9:34AM FROM SOUTHLAKE PARKS REC 817 421 2175 P_ 5 RECREATION PROGRAM PLANNING SHEET SOYTTHLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION COURSE: DAY: INSTUCTOR: DATE: LOCATION: TIME: FEE: 5-15-1997 10_44AM FROM SOUTHLAKE PARKS REC 817 421 2175 P- 4 Attachment "C" TIME ACTION PLAN SOUTHLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAM: INSTRUCTOR: LEAD STAFF: Task Description Person Date Date to Date to Completed Pt . � Assigned Assigned Report Complete L -- • 4-30--1997 9:34AM FROM SOUTI-LAKE PARKS REC 817 421 2175 P. 7 INTERIM SURVEY SOUI"HLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION Program/class: Program/class date: Hello,my name is and I am with Southlake Parks and Recreation_ I know is participating in and I was checking to see if everything with the program is going well. Any questions,comments,suggestions? Thank you for your time. Have a nice day Person Surveyed: Participant Phone# Comments: Actions taken by staff: ;sou Surveyed: Participant: Phone# Comments: Actions taken by staff: Person Surveyed: Participant: Phone# Comments: Actions taken by staff. Person Surveyed: Participant: Phone Comments: Actions taken by staff: ' 4-30-1997 9=35AM FROM Sin JTHLAKE PARKS REC 817 421 2175 P. 8 • Customer Satisfaction Survey City of Southlake Parks and Recreation Noose take a few moments to fill In this survey and drop It In the moil Thank yOU for helping us continue to imptov•our programs, How's our program running? Class/Program: f / ;�� f4 please rank each Item 5-1 v+ .� r (5.excellent. 1-poor) C tea. instructor 5 4 3 2 1 N/A How did you find out about the Class met expectations 5 4 3 2 1 N/A programs? Quality of equipment 5 4 3 2 I N/A Brochure Newspaper Flyers Cleanliness of facility 5 4 3 2 1 N/A Other: EtflcienCy of registration 5 4 3 2 1 N/A Cprlonol: NAME Overall evaluation 5 4 3 2 t N/A - PHONE Comments: • 111111 NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES smeiiiiimmommo BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS MAIL PERMIT NO.49 SOUTHLAKE.TX 1 POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY ADCRESSEE Shane Yelverton City of Southtake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southtake TX 76092-9966 Itrs�I.I1ii lri1IrlrrrrIiIt IriIiIusIIiu1lrrrllrrl • 4-3e-1997 9:344M FROM SOL;ThLAKE PARKS REC 817 421 2175 P. 6 RECREATION PROGRAM POST AUDIT SOUTHLAKE PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAM/CLASS: DATE: y .]F.]((. r ary , n w 4 STr;�'4.>Lt` `!"''�t•(x �a.�..•{{'1 1. >`F" {y�!}�.' t[f� 'F- :'ci1�ro ..2 T { �e� `k�:.c7 !A.(a.MY. r71i`f2r v�Y:V(�,1i �,l. .�:�u .-Q. •f`.� .Wi. ..`. .%!! Yiwl. a♦ . !i46Y.'.Me I #of Participants Income Cost of Supplies Cost of Special Equipment Cost of Food/Drink Cost of Entertainment Cost of Advertisement Cost of Extra Personnel Net pay to Instructor Net income to city Other CATEGORY SCORE Total %of Participants,. Instructor #Of Participants N/A Cleanliness of facility #Of CSR returned Quality of equipment Where did they see the class advertised? Courtesy of staff Brochure Efficiency of registration Flyer Overall Evaluation Newspaper Other x as e�ln9� �: •r•�s,� %�"..6 � r�a"�r� v � .Fx Y "3�r• � � >�: r'.�"..�5.�::a.� �,iP � x'�i. h�"d.:S :IF�..ti r, f �.n•. PROGRAM STRENGTHS: PROGRAM WEAKNESSES City of Southiake,Texas iharol MEMORANDUM May 14, 1997 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Fuel Spill Pumpco 768 S. Kimball Attached is a memo from Deputy Director Wilson concerning the continuous contamination of Pumpco at this site. We will be monitoring this situation closely as we believe that there has been negligence concerning contamination at Pumpco's wash rack and fueling station. 4C/bls J attachment City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 14, 1997 TO: Billy Campbell, Director, DPS From: Garland Wilson, Deputy Director, Fire Services Subject: Pumpco 768 South Kimball On May 8, 1997 Fire Service responded to 768 South Kimball for an unknown type of spill. Investigation of the smell suggested that Pumpco discharged or spilled a petroleum-based product from a wash rack area. The product traveled west in a small drainage ditch on Pumpco's property and then on neighboring properties. Pumpco, Inc., home office is in Denver, Colorado. Less Ainsworth(owner) of Pumpco began operating in Southlake at 768 South Kimball in September 1985. Currently Pumpco employs twenty-six people and operates twenty-one concrete pump trucks throughout the Metroplex. Properties effected by the spill include Pumpco's, Memo Equipment at 722 South Kimball, J. _t Tracy Custom Homes (701 Manchester) and 700 Manchester owned by developer Paul Spain. Affected properties, including down stream of the spill, will be tested for contaminants and appropriate action taken to remove any product hazardous to the environment. Mr. Ainsworth is cooperating with request from Southlake Fire Service, Texas Commission on Fire Protection and Environmental Protection Agency. Cleaning up the properties will take approximately two to four weeks depending on contamination and area affected. They will excavate and place contaminated material on nonpermeable plastic, allow it to aerate and then retest the material for contaminates. After the tests indicate that material excavated has returned to its natural state they will return it to its origin. We have ask Pumpco to comply with local, State and Federal laws. Pumpco made temporary changes to the wash rack area to prevent dischage of the waste products. Currently Mr. Ainsworth seeking a profesional engineer to design a containment area. Please contact me if you have any question. GW/gam" Y L'', N MAY 21997 L Ar Texas Departm .. cz, t s ortation ANA11 P.O. BOX 6868•FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76115-0868•(817) 370-6500 sAV �L iel NOTI('E-: OF E'l!Eil.l(' M1L I INt i SH 114 MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDY From LP 382 to Dallas County Line the hexas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) will conduct a public meeting to communicate transportation issues on the SH 114 corridor, from LP 382 west of Grapevine to the Dallas County I me The meeting will he held at the Grapevine Convention Center (Concord II Room), 1209 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, on May 21, 1997 A brief presentation will begin at 7:00 p.m. Pie presentation will communicate transportation issues relevant to this corridor. There will be an opportunity for each person to furnish comments. Such stated or written comments will assist study personnel in the evaluation of the need for transportation improvements to the corridor. Lie All interested citizens are invited to attend this public meeting. Written comments from the public regarding this project are requested. Written comments may be submitted either in person or by mail to the TxDOT District Office (2501 Southwest Loop 820, P. O. Box 6868, Fort Worth, Texas 76115). Persons interested in attending the meeting who have special communication or accommodation needs are encouraged to contact the Advanced Planning Office, Fort Worth District Office of the Texas Department of Transportation at (817) 370-6614. Requests should be made at least 72 hours prior to the public meeting. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate those needs. Rondell G. Fagan, P.E. Director of Transportation Planning and Development L An Equal Opportunity Employer L -, 2 1 ✓ w I� c 'y IT . : IttiVilltil 1.- :::FM-il:- 11;4" et) , r / '--'liglie --i.. \ - ___ --lap]. . -, lik raFt.t.6--- -poliz ) ? ,...., $tI /',.. „,,..,.... "�i■ig ER_ ii NA lip f' 441.11111114.• di .ff•711 tillIre. i! ,_ L ,--/,, „...., ,4,11 ...4 1 ,it, ;., 1--.- / , , imwei....__,....liurcl ....., , v .\‘11, lop-i......_ ; . i . mi ,! , -,. m.lieritiv . ,!. --1, - . • laTe • ' 4 _ pios 1.I , 1111)4 killiF'Ida TJ,, f 11.1/4 ,� �i� � ' vim kiliplar,4111: I Pi _... ....... a IU � _ O CO t 2 j > o O O 3.`�� s o.n e CO no 1 nil O o _ D 7 t 4- . ..,,,_ I rwri, I I r i YJ 4,,,, 0 ... _.....,....., " . ,,, `�`` .: op...ti \ Y ... — — — -ova— — — _ O. COW:, fillij .. ...... _._-_. — r > (lire YMCA Of Metropolitan Fort Worth Urban Services Branch 5342 Davis Blvd., Suite A North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 817-485-3933 NORTHEAST TRANSPORTftTION SERVICE Re ort for the month of March 1997 .` r0UTHLAKE M(1R . Year to daL.:. !.I . Riders Registered 0 Unduplicated Riders 5 (660" !rider Miles Traveled 324 rrne Way Trips 36 321 P type: Ned `ca 1 26 2',' Choppina 0 Social Services 0 Rec . & Sr . Services 6 1 school 0 it rl l_ i .r 4 10 72 Trips by Elderly 10 - Trips by Disabled' 26 25;2 ] rips by Others 0 0 YMCA Mission: (me To put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy body, mind, and spirit for all. • A United Way Agency P." r cT B a..$ / nO 9' § n gw VD Pt g n „,- cTI EA) cps .!.. F k4 ", 0 cn .:. o, o `� cn " 8 0 ! .. g4848. co xn go o 4w Mr' pia V1.0 n 00 TJ OQ W cry' " 47 y 'L3 `G W CIQ y ° 3 g xv, n c, n7w n n� 63 ° � `D n � - ce c n ou G• R i,, y IN � now o i. 9 > 9 o v 5'g o 1 o a g 0* s- ►Cn CDtn. .. 00 p 00 �1 ,.. 00 "° r) i5 X X () U3 6 o , oo $o MgO NJ $ � O c Ea y v n c ny i � p'0 ~ f w la gi(g " ° �°° gr 0000 nx � o ne°° 17 0 y 1.CD o ke g ,... �y y So .8 8 (4) gel x � gw a 5'9y5 � 95'so o39ai Ce R° R° N `C R. R. �D 01, N p Ntat v oo coo 0 o N 0 aoOQ 00 C °° ,Po �C CA 0 CD y " 04 00 OD OD e a `,° p.. rii R: -..1 .4,-4- I 1 0 0 c) ,..) t..) › ,_,. c„ ).,. . ,...,) , -c 4,.._ . ,,, ›. g co ‘•4 $13 0 CD CA 1-4 * * Ci I o 6'4 CA -...., i . I:: = i C K 00 ~X x S a o 0 GENERAL FUND Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended April 30, 1997 with Comparative Actual amounts for the period ended April 30, 1996 (fiscal month 7 -58.33%) Revised Percen Actual Percent Mon Year to Date 1996/97 Collected Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES 4 $ ' , 1996/97 Budget .1.-I'-' 4/30/96 9/30/96 Expended Ad Valorem Taxes $27,398 $3,234,574 $3,357,212 96.3% $2,750,253 $2,939,869 93.6% Sales Tax 104,732 841,620 1,846,000 45.6% 683,374 1,476,709 46.3% Franchise Fees 0 688,793 763,397 90.2% 414,047 509,630 81.2% Fines 48,589 256,446 353,600 72.5% 247,059 435,537 56.7% Charges for Services 27,098 128,187 279,850 45.8% 68,297 222,052 30.8% Permits/Fees 256,919 1,322,771 2,249,310 58.8% 1,509,441 2,642,353 57.1% Miscellaneous 39,524 84,739 105,179 80.6% 40,098 115,859 34.6% Interest Income Q 92.807 143.000 64.9% 58,219 159.851 36.4% Total Revenues $504,260 $6,649,937 $9,097,548 73.1% $5,770,788 $8,501,860 67.9% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $14,550 $134,405 $263,253 51.1% $120,609 $255,958 47.1% Human Resources 16,655 71,400 128,505 55.6% 0 0 0.0% City Manager 46,545 265,975 480,565 55.3% 214,305 432,524 49.5% Economic Development 15,061 47,556 114,882 41.4% 56,002 110,511 50.7% Support Services 94.206 683.953 1.045.160 65.4% 573.424 981.311 58.4% subtotal-General Govt. Dept. 187.017 1 203289 2 O'32365 59.2% 964340 1.780304 54.2% Finance 27,096 259,282 381,591 67.9% 175,158 390,664 44.8% Municipal Court 22,731 130,685 249,514 52.4% 106,809 206,602 51.7% Municipal Court-Teen Court 1.855 24,502 52.206 46.9% 22.290 38.212 58.3% subtotal-Finance Dept. 5.1 Ji87 414.469 683 311 60.7% 304.257 635 A7.8 47.9% Fire 76,974 613,797 1,452,264 42.3% 459,097 901,925 50.9% Police 155,448 1,241,784 2,188,966 56.7% 696,650 1,389,060 50.2% Public Safety Support 67.714 547.447 935.952 58.5% 450.081 835.717 53.9% subtotal-Public Safety Dept. 300,136 2 401 028 4577.182 52.5% 1,605,82R 3.176Z707 51.4% Building 32,941 267,915 511,928 52.3% 195,904 351,228 55.8% Streets/Drainage 60,958 401,074 896,918 44.7% 405,375 871,038 46.5% Public Works Administration 43.903 343.328 754.678 45.5% 197.497 360,338 54.8% subtotal-Public Works Dept. 137,802 1.012 317 2 J 63 524 46.8% 798.776 1 582.604 50.5% Parks and Recreation Dept. 60525 467_316 995.861 46.9% 277,596 623,974 36.5% Community Development Dept. 12.308 268 897 537.157 50.1% 190.7 4 417.495 45.7% Total Expenditures $771 570 S5.769 311 $10 989 400 52.5% S4 091 571 $8 166 557 50.1% Excess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenditures ($267,310 $880,626 ($1,891,852) $1,679,217 $335,303 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND (USES) Proceeds from C.O. Sale (net) $823,485 $833,485 $920,000 $0 $88,107 Transfer In-Other Funds 0 0 633,000 594,607 594,607 Transfer to Infrastructure 0 0 0 (377,288) (377.287) Total Other Sources/(Uses) $823,485 $833,485 $1,553,000 $217,319 $305,427 Excess(deficiency) of Revenues/other sources over Exp. $556 175 $1 714 111 f$318 8521 $1 896 516 $640 710 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $2,326,534 $2,326,534 $1,689,294 $1,689,294 Change in reserved fund balance $0 $0 ($3,490) ($3,490) ENDING FUND BALANCE S4 040 645 $1 987 682 S3 582340 S2 126 534 fund balance percentage 18 1% 28.5% 05/15/97 page 1 APR97.WK4 WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended April 30, 1997 and April 30, 1996 (fiscal month 7-58.33%) Revised Percen Actual Percent Mon Year to Date 1996-97 Collected Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES I ' , 1996-97 Budget .'••• 4/30/96 9/30/96 Expended Water Sales-residential $259,302 $1,820,440 $4,250,000 42.8% $1,898,341 $4,379,575 43.3% Water Sales-commercial 43,704 313,242 475,000 65.9% 263,446 576,519 45.7% Sewer Sales 66,377 437,704 590,000 74.2% 364,447 680,936 53.5% Sanitation Sales 44,941 301,113 508,000 59.3% 255,405 448,336 57.0% Other utility charges 38,595 223,553 359,000 62.3% 248,715 439,275 56.6% Miscellaneous 5,215 37,913 85,900 44.1% 81,002 168,453 48.1% Interest Income 0 45.535 68.750 66.2% 51.177 102.729 49.8% Total Revenues $458,134 $3,179,500 $6,336,650 50.2% $3,162,533 $6,795,823 46.5% EXPENSES Water $262,910 $1,706,527 $3,922,642 43.5% $1,393,208 $3,539,021 39.4% Sewer 90,310 480,306 744,873 64.5% 977,453 533,178 183.3% Sanitation 36,763 216,815 483,000 44.9% 191,638 393,855 48.7% Debt Service- Revenue Bonds 69.809 954.811 1.448.048 65.9% 115.361 1.835,341 6.3% Total Expenses $459,792 $3,358,459 $6,598,563 50.9% $2,677,660 $6,301,395 42.5% Excess (deficiency) of Revenue over Expenses __. : ($178.9591 ($2619131 $484 871 $494.428 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND (USES) Transfer In-Other Funds $58,181 $407,266 $698,170 $214,596 $367,879 Transfer Out-Other Funds 0 0 (633.000) (751.180) (1.55_,.556) Total Other Sources/(Uses) $58,181 $407,266 $65,170 ($536,584) ($1,187,677) Excess(deficiency)of Revenues and other sources over Expenses $56 523 $228 307 j$196 743) ($5 L7111 j$693 249) 05/15/97 page 2 APR97.WK4 a n 0 0 0 N ' a 0 n 0 CDC O M .N 0 n C- CD CO •Ol p C0 0 0 M ,5 Oni 0 V Q M me N e- - M CO m2 Z N000 .- NTr0 0) 0 0 '`^ V.` ^ n C O M N 0 0 CO CD CD "` E `J 1 O cs, 6 1n .0 co sr el 00 0) .0 t N `O 0-- 0 00 0 0 coN N- a,• N .- .- M CO ma) O _ 0 0 0 OD O N 0 0 _ 0 0 S v(D O v Cn C y y CO v v CO O N N Y �y, N CDQi O CD sr CO V* CO st0 M 0 Co .0 so C CO CO (A O • N n coO N s CO C7)0 N 7 0 C0 Z. le c0 CO y f0 lL yY N 000N n CO CD O N y -g F U M O N s) 0 M CO O CD CO O 0 t O j p C00 000) 00000 co j UM N .- N M N C) :E CD CD ; >•a sO p O O O O O O O O O C L O O O O O O O O O co . 4 C A N y OCOO) MONOO y Cy 0 n Cti -O Y U OCD C07Nnn �0 'L ` 0 0) CCp 1Oa• ocir- a C) C 0)0 roa. o p E cTi �j o rn rn0) 0)CD CD 0 2 0 U CO `o 0 0 n CD CO N O N O O .� C- Q c CDK C) s- 0C)03 '-0 0 coO ao0 O � C C y N C0 C0 n co"CD O n c0 CA y Q tl)O N a CC) M CD 0 r- CO a0 y> E E J C) j CC)O CC)CA O al 0 0 CO j co O O y y r7, "al C) • N .- M N 0CD CD t d > > C \ L 1- CO C C ,it V O Cf) O) CA st NO O 0 O y CO M u) CO N CD O CD y 1 CO CO V (0 CO el C)CD CO C0 sr 0 0 co CO a, CD Y0:g T U) N NQf OC_ONn O O y CT Q) ..... f`9 y /D CO U to O) t CD to O) co t 01 Cn 0 0 CO 2 O O '0 > T� a) CO l0 y Ll N .- .- co- (Si L1 CD CO Q 0 M. ,- CO m O x a a, p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o CO N O O 0 F-�' O) o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o o M co y o0000000 st co O 0 CD C+) co y" y COB 0) 0• 000000 M (5 O 0) N = Y C n L y NMNCDM N O C�) 0 y N N O O ` • 0 N N CD st Nst st CO 2 � M M O o l0 0 COO 03 Co 7• 3 p /- M elCO st st Trst CD el 2 > N 7 OTo; a Cn0CCD000Cno o a CO 0 N v CO O = co V) a, On CD CO CO M el0 0 CO N00 0 CO O CD N N O co O 0 O C") st CO O C N 8CO Ost OC) � O) C cl C00 Ca °°°��eCyyyyyyy O O 2 0n CO el CA Ty ` 00NMTn00 V •y O 0 (O 0) 0 03 U _'c a0 00mmmOoi00 tla 0 m> n 0 v co C) CACA m On) C00) T 'O CO I y co N CC) CO sr N M CO . N .0.. 0) T T N N N V _ L C` CO � s C) N- CD M CO Cy -0 CO 'p O'O n aC rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M o ,- N 7 N CCOO 0 el _ 00000000 C 0 CY CL � co C0 O 0) to C No000CD00o " p 01 N Z' C07 ui CA CA N a o c) c) CV N N 00 rn 13 a Coj E E CO) Y = 0 N0)M CD C 7 E E C Cp(O O t0 t[') CA to Oan to to w 0 <n E y'Es 2 > • O N O 0) Near 00000000 0_ E 0 0 013I _ N N O N N • 0000000 N 00 CO O000 M 0000000o CO Oa c0 CO Cd 0 C00 0 N O) C0 t0Otl') NO co" y �y O) 0) as Yg n CA CA D) n Q C0 co co O)co V N. 0 CD CL CO CO O N 0 CA N CO C0 o00000000 h Ln O o m0 � CA I-- CD • N .c- s- CD- CV. N CD CD aN O T O T t NH NC=L C=L ZLA. C=L U.LLV N to 01� x 0 ?N Z 2 To CO D � Z JLLLL a a < t0 O t00�0 -p y Nn000') to tnn � y m CO Nr10 Y c O a 0) 00 00 03 CD CT C0 L N a L U y . 1 OcenM V.)) � a) Mo .�V 0 .0 c c = MC7 MMMM p CO O C` CO nnnnCpOtOn 0n • 0-) ar-> c COCA O CA CDO)0)CA O O) m l7 C a� y MO � NN �� z a N N y CO 0 C/) CO N f0 MC� M � O T cm L LILa. C O E O O . 0CfN0 C) x >L C F HF- <0 m 0 5U W TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT 15 MAY 97 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE NAME OF TAXING UNIT LISTED BELOW ARE PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF THE 1997 APPRAISED VALUES OF THE PROPERTY IN YOUR DISTRICT . THESE ARE GROSS FIGURES THAT ARE YET SUBJECT TO REDUCTIONS RESULTING FROM : COMPLETION OF STAFF DISCUSSIONS WITH TAXPAYERS APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD APPEALS RENDITION FILING DEADLINE PARTIAL EXEMPTION PROCESSING ABSOLUTE EXEMPTION PROCESSING SPECIAL EXEMPTION PROCESSING ( FREEPORT , OPEN-SPACE , AG DEFERRAL , FOREIGN TRADE ZONE , ETC ) CONSERVATIVELY , THE REDUCTIONS TO THE ESTIMATES HAVE AVERAGED AROUND 5% ON A COUNTYWIDE BASIS PRIOR TO THE CERTIFIED VALUES IN JULY . 1997 APPRAISAL ROLL INFORMATION VALUATION SUMMARY TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $1 , 646 , 150 , 485 - DEFERRED SPECIAL USE VALUE LOSS : AGRICULTURAL $66 , 786 , 657 SCENIC LAND $0 - PARTIAL EXEMPTION VALUE LOSS: DISABLED VETERAN $426 , 500 OVER-65 $11 , 615 , 800 HOMESTEAD $0 DISABLED PERSON $866 , 900 FREEPORT INVENTORY $426 , 464 • - PP NOMINAL VALUE LOSS : $3 , 205 NET TAXABLE VALUE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $1 , 566 , 024 , 959 NEW CONSTRUCTION >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $200 , 355 , 207 ( INCLUDED IN NET TAXABLE VALUE ) j I 2315 Gravel Drive Fort Worth,Texas 76118 (817)284-0024 TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT JOHN MARSHALL CHIEF APPRAISER 15 MAY 97 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 1997 A . R . B . PROTEST INFORMATION THE PROTEST PERIOD HAS JUST BEGUN AND ITS FILING DEAD- LINES DO NOT END UNTIL 30 DAYS AFTER THE LAST NOTICE IS DELIVERED . THE A . R . B . WILL BEGIN HEARING PROTESTS IN MID-JUNE . LISTED BELOW ARE THE VALUES-TO-DATE OF PROTESTED ACCOUNTS IN YOUR TAXING UNIT . THESE VALUES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR ESTIMATE ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE AND ADDITIONAL PROTESTS ARE PROBABLE . 7 , 183 , 573 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTIES UNDER PROTEST 7 , 083 , 573 NET TAXABLE VALUE OF PROPERTIES UNDER PROTEST 4 , 928 , 502 ESTIMATED MINIMUM TAXABLE VALUE OF THE SAME PROPERTIES 2315 Gravel Drive Fort Worth,Texas 76118 (817)284-0024 PGM: APR222BP CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 022 RUNDATE : 13 MAY 97 *** REAL PROPERTY TOTALS *** ROLL : 13 MAY 97 1997 LINE REPORT ITEM VALUE ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE 1 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE : 1 , 592 , 430 , 575 8 , 434 1 , 592 , 430 ,575 2 CASES BEFORE ARB ( - ) 6 , 793 , 573 20 6 , 793, 573 3 ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS ( - ) 49 , 905 , 391 699 49 , 905,391 4 ADJUSTED VALUE TOTAL ( _ ) 1 , 535 , 731 , 611 7 , 715 1 , 535 , 731 ,611 5 AG DEFERRALS ( - ) 66 , 786 , 657 240 67 , 307 ,829 8 PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS ( - ) 12 , 909 , 200 296 43 , 951 , 700 12 NET TAXABLE VALUE ( : ) 1 , 456 , 035 , 754 8 , 414 1 ,585, 637 , 002 PARTIAL EXEMPTION DETAIL EXEMPT AMT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 13 DISABLED VETERANS 426 , 500 50 8 , 242, 500 15 OVER-65 11 , 615 , 800 248 34, 571 , 500 17 DISABILITY 866 , 900 20 3 , 378, 600 NEW FOR 1997 TAXABLE VALUE ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE 21 NEW CONSTRUCTION VALUE IMPROVEMENT ONLY 1 , 056 199 , 224, 156 22 ANNEXATIONS 0 0 23 NEW EXEMPTION ACCOUNTS 5 , 177 , 500 61 12 , 982 ,668 24 NEW DEFERRAL ACCOUNTS 3 , 060 5 1 , 225 , 242 26 IMPROVEMENT VALUE LOSS 1 , 788 , 202 5 DETAIL ON THE NEW EXEMPTIONS EXEMPT AMT ACCOUNTS PRVO APPRAISED VALUE 27 NEW ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS 6 , 562 , 268 30 20 6 ,562,26E 28 NEW VETERANS EXEMPTIONS 30 , 000 6 1 ,725 , 30C 30 NEW OVER-65 1 , 162 , 900 24 4, 409 , 000 32 NEW DISABILITY 50 , 000 1 286, 100 36 NEW AG DEFERRALS 1 , 222 , 182 5 1 , 225 , 242 ******************************************************************************** PGM: APR222BP CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 022 RUNDATE : 13 MAY 97 *** PERSONAL PROPERTY TOTALS *** ROLL : 13 MAY 97 1997 LINE REPORT ITEM VALUE ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE 1 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE : 110 , 808 , 874 509 110 ,808,874 2 CASES BEFORE ARB ( - ) 390 , 000 1 390,000 3 ABSOLUTE EXEMPTIONS ( - ) 0 0 4 ADJUSTED VALUE TOTAL ( _ ) 110 ,418,874 508 110, 418,874 8 PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS ( - ) 426 , 464 1 631 ,472 11 NOMINAL VALUE XMPTS ( - ) 3 , 205 13 3,205 12 NET TAXABLE VALUE ( _ ) 109, 989 , 205 508 110 , 418,874 PARTIAL EXEMPTION DETAIL EXEMPT AMT ACCOUNTS APPRAISED VALUE 13 DISABLED VETERANS 0 0 14 FREEPORT INVENTORY 426 , 464 1 631 ,472 15 OVER-65 0 0 17 DISABILITY 0 0 NEW FOR 1997 TAXABLE VALUE ACCOUNTS ZERO APPRAISED VALUE 21 NEW BUSINESS IN NEW IMP 1 , 131 , 051 15 1 , 131 , 051 23 NEW EXEMPTION ACCOUNTS 0 0 26 IMPROVEMENT VALUE LOSS 0 0 DETAIL ON THE NEW EXEMPTIONS EXEMPT AMT ACCOUNTS PRVO APPRAISED VALUE 30 NEW OVER-65 0 0 32 NEW DISABILITY 0 0 ********************************************************************************= CITY OF SOUTHLAKE APPRAISED PROPERTY VALUE ANALYSIS Net Taxable Value May 15, 1997 Percentage Change from Preliminary Values to Certified Values SUPPLEMENTAL TAX PRELIMINARY CERTIFIED %CHANGE (FINAL) %CHANGE YEAR MAY 15 JULY 25 FROM PRFI,i SF.PT 1 FROM PRELIM 1997 $1,573,208,532 $1,526,012,276 -3.00% $1,541,744,361 -2.00% estimate estimate estimate estimate 1996 $1,331,993,102 $1,297,133,915 -2.62% $1,309,434,958 -1.69% 1995 $1,056,570,437 $1,041,743,161 -1.40% $1,063,870,538 0.69% 1994 $829,386,416 $808,385,458 -2.53% $810,175,414 -2.32% 1993 $705,978,949 $680,726,791 -3.58% $683,048,098 -3.25% 1992 $621,449,533 $608,254,817 -2.12% $610,461,706 -1.77% 1991 $579,469,791 $569,475,542 -1.72% $570,763,061 -1.50% 1990 $537,311,716 $520,442,493 -3.14% $525,019,736 -2.29% average reduction in values for 1990 through 1996 -2.45% -1.73% This schedule calculates the percentage change in taxable values from preliminary estimates to the July 25 values and the September 1 supplemental,:ertification. Comparison of Annual Value Changes %CHANGE %CHANGE SUPPLEMENTAL TAX PRELIMINARY FROM PRIOR CERTIFIED FROM PRIOR (FINAL) ANNUAL YEAR MAY 15 YEAR FINAL JULY 25 YEAR FINAL, SEPT 1 %CHANG1; 1997 $1,573,208,532 20.14% $1,526,012,276 16.54% $1,541,744,361 17.74% (new) S700 355 207 700 355 207 700 155 107 (net) $1,372,853,325 4.84% $1,325,657,069 1.24% $1,341,389,154 2.44% estimate 3% reduction estimate 2%reduction 1996 $1,331,993,102 25.20% $1,297,133,915 21.93% $1,309,434,958 23.08% (new) $147 838 347 133.867 175. 119 499 416 (net) $1,184,154,760 11.31% 51,163,266,540 9.34% $1,169,935,122 9.97% 1995 $1,056,570,437 30.41% $1,041,743,161 28.58% $1,063,870,538 31.31% (new) S147 665 229 144 397 189 148 280 910 (net) $908,905,208 12.19% $897,345,972 10.76% $915,589,628 13.01% 1994 $829,386,416 21.42% $808,385,458 18.35% • $810,175,414 18.61% (new) $101 696 081 5102.246917 S101R97ill (net) $727,690,335 6.54% S706,138,521 3.38% $706,282,901 3.40% 1993 $705,978,949 15.65% $680,726,791 11.51% $683,048,098 11.89% (new) $67 645 069 $65 546 035 S66 189 444 (net) $638,333,880 4.57% $615,180,756 0.77% $616,858,654 1.05% 1992 $621,449,533 8.88% 5608,254,817 6.57% $610,461,706 6.96% (new) $11,007 777 S11 645 Rol $32.071.090 (net) $588,442,261 3.10% $576,609,016 1.02% $578,390,616 1_34% 1991 $579,469,791 10.37% $569,475,542 8.47% $570,763,061 8.71% (new) 678 698 179, S7R 859 890 $79,070 5R4 (net) $550,771,413 4.90% $540,615,652 2.97% $541,742,476 3.19% 1990 $537,311,716 1.15% $520,442,493 -2.02% $525,019,736 -1.16% (new) S10 291 935 S10 770 771 610 162 939 (net) $527,019,781 -0.79% $510,221,722 -3.95% $514,656,797 -3.11% 1989 - - - - $531,191,585 This schedule reflects the percentage change in values compared to the previous year's September 1(final)value. 05/16/97 1 TADREDUC.WK4 tit City City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-050 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Rucker's Hacienda de Gusto STAFF CONT4CT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Rucker's Hacienda de Gusto, being legally described as approximately 53.09 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tracts 3 and 3E, and being all of Common Green No. 36, Timarron Addition-Brenwyck, Phase 2. This plat proposes two (2) lots. LOCATION: East of the Timarron Addition-Brenwyck,Phase 2,and at the east end of the Durham Court cul-de-sac OWNERS: William and Zena Rucker APPLICANTS: Mike and Carol Rucker CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District (Tract 3E and a portion of Tract 3) and "SF-30" Single Family Residential District(a portion of Tract 3 and all of Common Green No. 36, Timarron Addition-Brenwyck, Phase 2). LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty-two (22) RESPONSES: Three(3)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Mark Womble, 720 Nettleton Dr., Southlake, in favor. • David Koeninger, 722 Nettleton Dr., Southlake,opposed. "It was our understanding that no houses would be directly behind ours." • Grace Allison, 726 Nettleton, Southlake, opposed. "We were told nothing would be built behind us which is why we chose our lot. Our lot was considered a prime lot because of that and we paid for it." P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated May 2, 1997. City of Southlake,Texas STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all items in Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated May 2, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated May 16, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-050PP.WPD L C 'vs .......- ... ,..._..".,...- •• e, 1 • -,-- r-!--,--r-- ! ! 1 . • , . . . i : -- -0----.!--- A -i----i di i i ii • - , IA '2,1 . + • /.." i • 0 t ''• t i i V I> i ... ,.......I -4--- C 1. i • i i i • . i i ; i . ---; • t---, I i -_ 2A 2 S. , , i i i \ i , 1 -1 sr i i ? / ./.., \ k i. .., -1-4---4-- g ,,_ • 3 W i i i i \ is ! f _.....i -----,•-1001)------- -- __i ' i 3 "-.\ ITY c„,:•....,..ii i I II HAIL It . ..t.. e I. ',-.....-au „,. .-1-..- -. --rA ---< r-H i 1 \ . •74 --.4 i------ ; ---r--1- ., -----r—rtir------ __. / --`44--, a I I I , --t---1,--#----r d ..."-' I y r i ! i i 5A „.... . i I i a i . 1, • • '. . . X s./ / : 5.1•0cm.,••/•■•••.- '' i i ; . '", i I j i i i i I 1 • f! - - - ' '"IT- '-!I'''Ir:.1/f' i .--i t 1 1 --r e • • • ; :#-------) }-- . I ../. P i - • • - -IS 1L tf1-% 13 M..-IXi l,•• -1-----1_____ # - 3.,s•n esms••,•_i••-•I-t.-te- , — 2 5 A .•i e, 22--A - •_ _ - ,'.._.-'•, 33D0I2 2,A71 6I 6\5 I A c_1 II - X _ _ 311 lcc 3 X30D1 '•e,' 1 ---____—x1 14r.t• 172-0A 0 r 501 D2 3A 3AI 3C 3 - 2i A2 1i k 3BI Or i' Mgr 4 1 e 51-A 50,1 G 2-053k 1 iv . ,0005 TO A• 6 At .-' 'p Ac .52 A.: .............. 15 A - 3D1 "I 1 30.6 Ac 1_,.....1-', MI•RC 0 tOrti izcH 12 c./ 1,-1 rLII At 1 30 302 ADV1 31 ''''.... Cilri -r—I, f A \ , 1-1--r4 1 , ‘ if itiiititti i II ‘te y ii 2A to •12 • 2A5 i. , 2A3 2 • 4.23 401 4 ;••••2J_ -F-i-4--J i• Ac . ice2o.. --'''---.... ' 6 • hie. rr .'\ • . :-... ',...„...........__ t....., l':..•=777-. tia f . i . ii . . .....- ,..,.....-, r A PK COURT 0- • •s - 1,.. , ,ii 21 Ac•••;) ( ,.....--, 11... L...... . .- , ., f i i ir ,,,, yit—lka)11 504 14 [i 0183EDIrl Wt.,:-N• _,-- r ti:. i I 11 tile - ?)k k%\ • \ ,et* QL ..c. sumer A-888- r--- i al , .S3) ! • 2C Mr@ 2C2A . • •MI , ......:/ _ _ 1.170 , • . t- • i j 1.,. - ' .. t I irl- , jr_sino inatig-: _._ 1. . _ rf .... i- MI - ' • ' ...,..,-.:•.....ii , .."--"---il • i ,./. Plif - t • • i i ! - A 1 i 4 At 4 At ..r -1----> r •• i : i 1 • ! iiil i • tA3 rts/A 59 20 A, r , .i. ... . . . 14V, ' , n 58 i ‘ 1/3 — cAgto HALE- .," -.t. ..-• amitisiifil 1 48 OW001 i• - A 1 4A , 111111• A-8418 1111. ' 1111f.79 i - ; ... -v.+. i ' ! Lirirl-T. F'ti - - -. . -- ' " 1r- A1A MI ...--, MI 2A 28 ,-.• 50 .e.,•'. A i 1 1 .k.1 . - - • i . 'P 1 i Ilk • lir 6A tA2 e-t-.,- 1 . ,, ..... . \1/4t,,, ,. 4 ilt.,. . . , .:-.... 6AI.I IA a : Wit I',: ;..siziz —rc- , vi , ••: , .... ., n. \ ! -c- •a -n• . ''• •• - • in 6C t a yr 10 k 10 le r---, , . : .0•4111,1001 * -t- np'-' . . . rr- -----EP 1111...1,2"or.... ,..... t'l 43.01 AC i • 112, - I. 6E 2 1./ 2A2 -- s:n•:•••,.•••-•r4.-101. '4. .)*, ..• 1AI . - ---_._"--=--- . .4"-; 1. ' EAST CON111.1ENTAL 131.‘• • • ----. —.—___-------- .111; 3C 363111, .,,1;1t 7 .___:.......,.. . .,.,..,..,.,._ , .... ..........__ . , , „ , _ . . . . •••••a•A444 maw- ,.. z_._ .21 ! i i A.W. •.. k • ' P 7 .,-. 1144\ • ' * L--2-A IA 11 18 101 I ..' _ •iiii • iV -. !,,,...414 ak, 1.2„: .._ • 17 At IA ' Mr-9. •Y al E CI ,11. - k ,* )1:-.... - 1 ! ' i\IFP1,- .•2 •' .,...t -w--1--It- ... __,-. --2A2. ' I i i / , 54 :pie .:':••4•Ar- •"" ..1,...1 :1 ''..,•\-11-ii- e . TRACT MAP i 1 . .•••"S . 44.66 -, I 3 AC 3213 Ac w&- ..- Ac . 1111.1.1. J.-.. ., • ..... ...._, \ ..,. )... 111111. . . ..... , i 4• ,_ 1 4 i 4::-.1 '. ....1 /. iiiii i.sw ,,TH I . IE\'• 54... .----- G. i-r-;.: •---- 4 ,:. .,-,...... HALL MEDLIN . iNg'T T XI 211 N... 26 1"--y....24, ! •••.1-.: SLAW!' A-4037 i ...." . 1 1 1 TR 302 • , ".• lj 4.2AC t t1G TR 30 it 4.2AC T4 I r e 0 ry ` R COYNON GREEN No 4.9LL C57).... - t s.zsE 0 ".a I; iR 401 41 I tio •. "2(1 • r. I . TR 2 1 _ ^ 1�� •`I Z1 AC � I ! '1 1�R1 i 9 � O i c4 i 1 0.(a•-iji• •• TR 4E1 f \.i 1 I ! ,2 d i ® •s is' . . t a- f o 22 p 1 it w \ 1 „0p Q (. „ : F' 1 g rl I 4� —w 1^ s TR 4E \ • 5 i \\ \ \ .... . ,,...-•....•...s, \ i : TR 2C1 -OM- . TR 3E \ 1 2.33 AC a 1 t 1•• 1 0 ` \ \. � ( iw w w ._.� 1. / 1 E. t li l I11 L Mi 1a \ 1 v 1 L • lc �•_ e., I •• 1 __ -. TR 4F •� 12.8E AC/47 .@.a 9 .. • • OAKCREST CT \� • • Ill. ,,,a) .��1/\ ' r .. fa) 'pA \ ��-p�� .w w w w w - 1 ,, ' 11. 12 r 13 5,40f 1S 2 19 N ! I 35 AC ...... ...-.al--A.ai I �,lir DURNAlI CT � 1 U Q l� +i le Paloma (pvt) - , • • -. 'liiii AN g(:-)nb ni 1 I: ti. 1.....• 51 3 '_ - T lin 9.30 ' ►-rla 16 I TR EA1A 1.0 AC1 = V 1 1 N DR C 22 TR 8A2 2.02 AC TR 8A 1.98 AC 11 A+ 21 vii„ A'�7 W i .r m i =•^ i z 1 20 ! ` 9 3 f0 ! I1 i u ! 13 TR w U 6 `I lid ' ,29,! a1M 2.44 AC ; iti t 19 N t w y g i74 I i1 11l 1!$ L12 310i 'LAND CR " DR 13 X +1E sA s ! z ! 3 a 4 �O�.E iRo�c ��A\. ikige, I ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING j SPIN #9 LAURA MIKLOSKO 94- 7' ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING FOR ZA97-044 Low, 02-May-97 # Owner Name Zoning_ 01 TIMARRON LAND CORP AG 02 TIMARRON LAND CORP AG 03 TIMARRON LAND CORP AG 04 C&ANITA PRADE AG 05 a C PRADE AG 06 ' LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 07 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 08 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 09 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 10 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 11 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 12 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 13 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 14 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 15 LAKES OF LA PALOMA JV AG 16 WILLIAM W&ZENA RUCKER AG 17 TOMMY&REBECCA BARNETT AG 18 WILLIAM W&ZENA RUCKER AG 19 PATRICIA BRADLEY PUD-1 20 JAMES&ELIZABETH CULLING PUD-1 21 DWIGHT&GRACE ALLISON PUD-1 22 KENNETH W&MALISSA PUD-1 23 DAVID&JUDITH KOENINGER PUD-1 L.' 24 MARK&JO ANN WOMBLE PUD-1 25 RICHARD AGIN PUD-1 26 GUY&JUDITH TRIBBLE PUD-1 27 WILLIAM&KRISTIN HYLAND PUD-1 28 C&JUDY EASTMAN, PUD-1 29 WEEKLEY HOMES INC PUD-1 30 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 31 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 32 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 33 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 34 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 35 DREES HOMES PUD-1 36 DREES HOMES PUD-1 37 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 40 KERRY DONEGAN PUD-1 41 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 42 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 43 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 44 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 45 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 46 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 47 TIMARRON LAND CORP PUD-1 48 TIMARRON LAND CORP SF-1A 49 LESTER BRISCOE, AG 50 CFD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AG 51 VERSAILLES LTD AG L 1 City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY ase No::Z 97-050 Review No:Two Date of Review: 5/16/97 Project Name;Preliminary Plat-Lots 1&2,Block 1.W.W.Rucker Addition being 53.09 acres situated jn the O.W.Knight Survey.Abstract No.899 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Michael&Carol Rucker Ward Surveying Company 1809 Harvest.Mom Drive P.O. Box 820253 Grapevine.Texas 76051 Fort Worth.Texas 76182-0253 Phone : (817)481-2291 Phone : (817)281-5411 Fax : Fax : (817) 838-7093 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Correct the references to the common green boundary corners in the 2nd and 3rd calls from the beginning, "northwest" to "southwest" and "northeast" to "northwest," respectively. Also, please check text justification for the legal description;the word"line"is cut off in the 2nd call. 2. Provide the following with regard to adjacent properties within 200': A. Correct the deed record for the Approved Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition Phase 5 to "Westerra Timarron,L.P.,Vol. 12612,Pg. 1631,D.R.T.C.T.,"and move the reference so that it is clearly legible. B. Label"Block 12" for Brenwyck Phase 1. 4. Show and label the extent of the 100-year floodplain limits and 100-year floodway. Designate the area inundated by the ultimate 100-year storm as a drainage easement. 5. Correct the proposed land use to "Medium Density Residential" in the Quantitative Land Use Schedule. Please note that the chart provided on Review Summary No. 1 was an example only and the information supplied may or may not have been applicable to this case * A drainage study, along with water, sewer and drainage plans, will be required with any revised preliminary plat or final plat submitted for Lot 1,Block 1. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Michael&Carol Rucker Ward Surveying Co. William&Zena Rucker: 650 South Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092,(817)481-1185 '.:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97050PP2.W PD a r Le "P-1111 15=1; :n 1:: 5:::1 : ::: : :5 .II; :5 I i' -'E !iz c : . cra F. ii2 ar. i_ :.s isli _i"_:r' is t m5a1s_— 1 : P a s s° sY • Y -_' :s= aii 1: :: ;: =i Ott i':- _ •'milr: .s :s rx: gs'=Ea- s 1 it •t T t ili zEZ 1 Y '-� ... ii} _ L 1 1:::1 .;i �i •11-t l� ;. ; (ii:°1 • !. 4 r` 1 It- .r E, 11. . •? `, 2 r . f i Y s e„2Sir T• ` i $!� it i l t \,T` I m U a'ir: �e: i , , ; t - re, O sae ,<i� £. i 5f1 u J- , I. M1 J 3 Yoursfp ....... • - •t1YON AROIR N•ON '!s '1'-`� —� ``,WV, V' j . -.12 ' tt% t .litiffilf - I ill Ali I 4 1 ! • • t _a e, 44 �. ! : i - ii.• i it tt is t=i , . k.(...,..: ... . • . _. : : i e' • . IEEE • L City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 97-39 (71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE FOURTH TUESDAY EVENINGS OF THE MONTH, AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 2.09 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, DURING THE MONTHS OF MAY THROUGH AUGUST, 1997. WHEREAS, Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake requires all ordinances "...shall be read in open meetings of the Council on two (2) separate Council meetings which shall be a regular meeting..."; and WHEREAS, Section 3.11(b) of the Charter provides that ordinances "...may be passed at any regular or special meeting called for that purpose provided notice has been given in accordance with the Open Meetings Act..."; and, LWHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter provides that "...the City Council may establish as many additional regular meetings during the month as may be necessary for the transaction of the business of the City..."; and, WHEREAS, the number of one-time additional items and issues requiring City Council action during the spring and summer, such as the possible Tax Increment Financing District, Crime Control/Prevention District election, Charter amendment election, extraterritorial jurisdiction annexation, and new regulatory control ordinances, are of such importance that additional regular meetings will be required for proper City Council consideration of the issues. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this resolution as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. The City Council hereby establishes the fourth Tuesday evenings of the months of May (May 27), June (June 24), July (July 22), and August (August 26) 1997 as regular meetings of the City Council. `J9—/ City of Southlake,Texas Resolution No. 97-39 Page 2 Section 3. This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF MAY, 1997. ATTEST: Mayor Rick Stacy Sandy L. LeGrand, City Secretary D:1 WP-FILES\ORD-RES.AGR`.97-39.RES L • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 16, 1997 1 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager 1 FROM: Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager 1 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 675, 2"d reading, Granting consent to the assignment and transfer of cable television system and franchise from Harron Cablevision to j Marcus Cable. 1 This item was approved by City Council on first reading at the April 15, 1997 meeting. At the time, we told Council that since we already had a franchise agreement in effect with Marcus Cable, there was some question as to how that affected the transfer, and whether we would operate under two franchise agreements, or amend the current agreement with Marcus. At the May 6, City Council meeting, staff requested that the second reading of the ordinance be tabled until we had an opportunity to discuss with Marcus the addition of several items into the current franchise agreement, which was with Sammons prior to their sale to Marcus Cable. 'I A comparison of the current franchise agreements the City has with Harron Cablevision and Marcus Cable is attached. Staff has also surveyed other cities served by Marcus Cable in regards to their franchise agreements and the results of this survey are also attached. As can be seen from the comparison of Southlake's franchise agreements with Harron and Marcus, the major items we want continued under an agreement with Marcus are: 1. A government access channel for use by the City. 2. An emergency interrupt transmission path and emergency use of the cable system. 3. Provisions for ensuring adequate signal quality. 4. Provision of service and equipment to public facilities. In addition, we intend to discuss with Marcus Cable their plans to extend service to those areas of Southlake that have not been served. We have a meeting scheduled with representatives of Marcus Cable and Harron Cablevision on Monday, May 19. Marcus has indicated that they do not have a problem including the services noted above. Depending on the results of this meeting, we may come forward with an amendment to the existing franchise, rather than the request to transfer. Please note that we are not renegotiating the existing franchise agreement with Marcus, but simply seeking to amend the existing agreement. I am available for any further questions you may have. L.., KH Attachments 74—I SOLITHLAKE'S FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS Harron Cable Marcus Cable Termination September 1, 2000 June 15, 2008 Date 15 sears 15 years Transfer of N/A N/A Franchise Revenues 3°i%GSR 5°i0 GSR Complaint Maintain a written log of complaints Office accessible by phone 365 days/ Procedures 24 hours a day;complaints serviced within 24 hours; maintain a service log Extension of >250 feet of aerial extensions plus within 500 feet of existing trunk Service >100 feet of underground extensions; cable; number of homes to be passed average number of houses will not be exceeds/equals 50/mile reduced <40/mile Channels 1 channel reserved for public school N/A (iroof use provided free of charge Service 48 hour notice: Emergency use of N/A Interruptions CATV available upon request: transmission path for emergency provided Operational Quality of Picture; Cross Modulation/ N/A Standards Interference Other Basic service without charge to City N/A Hall, Main Fire station and each public school,capable of receiving and transmitting audio and video signals. • 1 Page 1 MARCUS CABLE ASSOCIATES, LTD. Law Ft. Worth North Richland Hills Crowley Companies Sammonsi Marcus Sammons/Marcus Sammons/Marcus Termination N/A January 28. 2007 15 years Date Transfer of N/A No transfer without written No transfer without written Franchise approval from the City approval from the City Revenues N/A 5%GSR 5%GSR Complaint Same quality as Sammons plus Toll free telephone number Office near the City,accessible Procedures historical expenditure info. and accessible 365 days a year, 24 toll free number 365 days a staff levels on customer service hours a day; maintain a service year, 24 hours a day; maintain log a service log Extension of Line extensions based on a 30 >250 feet of existing cable, >250 feet of existing cable. Service home per mile number of homes which number of homes which exceeds/equals 40/ mile exceeds/equals 50/mile Channels 5 access channels 1 educational access channel for Lifeline to public schools, fire. BISD. Haltom HS and TCJC. police stations and City Hall. 1 and 1 governmental access educational access channel and channel 1 governmental access channel (illbre Service N/A yes yes Interruptions Operational None None None Standards Signal Provide written report of such All testing done in person and All testing done in person and Quality testing - providing a written report providing a written report Other Provide same installation and Provide same installation and Activities prohibited; Provide service without charge to service without charge to public same installation and service public facilities. the highest facilities; will not pass through without charge to public level of installation/service "external costs" except which facilities, the highest level of without charge as it provides to exceed$500/year: Provide and installation/service without other communities in the Ft. be responsible for maintaining charge as it provides to other Worth area. and will not pass the connection of an communities in the Ft. Worth through"external costs" except Institutional Connection area.and will not pass through which exceed$5,000/year. Network Service to all "external costs" except which municipally-owned buildings exceed$500/year; doesn't within the City at its expense. allow cable or other operations to be interfered with television receptions of persons not serviced. Li..., 71-3 Page 2 Lie MARCUS CABLE ASSOCIATES, LTD. Benbrook White Settlement Everman Companies Sammons/ Marcus Storer/Marcus Austin& Associates Termination August 11. 2006 15 years N/A Date Transfer of No transfer without written No transfer without written No transfer without written Franchise approval from the City approval from the City approval from the City Revenues 5%GSR 5%GSR 4%GSR Complaint Telephone number accessible Local business office with Office near or in the City with a Procedures 24 hours a day, 7 days a week normal hours, maintain a listed telephone number; Service with historical expenditure service log,and provide calls made promptly. information and staffing levels actions within 2 days of provided; All complaints will receipt. go through Marcus' local office manager. Extension of >500 feet of existing mink Not stated Average density is 7 subscribers/ Service cable. number of homes 1/4 mile (Woe exceeds/equals 10/ 1/4 mile. Channels 1 non-commercial Provide studio access.video 1 educational access channel, 1 governmental access channel to taping, equipment and governmental access channel and be programmed by the City; remote capabilities. 1 public access channel with also provided are portable Assistance will be free of studio. lights and sound equipment camcorders.video camera and charge up to 40 hours a VCR month. afterwards fee will be negotiated on a per hour basis. Service yes Not stated yes Interruptions Operational None Activities prohibited Interconnection,Theft of Services Standards and Tampering Signal All testing done in person and All testing done in person None . Quality providing a written report. and providing a written report. Other Provide same installation and Provide same installation Public buildings connected at no service without charge to and service without charge to charge. which include any other public facilities. the highest public facilities. the highest public facilities that may exist in level of installation/service level of installation/service the future: Political Advertising without charge as it provides to without charge as it provides and Religious programming C....' other communities in the Ft. to other cities in the FW leasing opportunities at Worth area, and will not pass area, and will not pass commercial rates. through 'external costs" except through"external costs" which exceed$500/year. except which exceed$500/yr. 2 (kr' ORDINANCE NO. O7f AN ORDINANCE GRANTING CONSENT TO THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM AND FRANCHISE FROM HARRON CABLEVISION OF TEXAS,INC. TO MARCUS CABLE ASSOCIATES, L.P.; AND APPROVING AN ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the cable television franchise in the City of Southlake (the Franchise) is currently owned and operated by Harron Cablevision of Texas, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as Harron Cablevision); and WHEREAS, On March 4, 1997 Harron Cablevision and Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, (hereinafter referred to as Marcus Cable) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Harron Cablevision agreed to assign and transfer the Franchise and its cable television system in the City of Southlake, Texas to Marcus Cable; WHEREAS, Harron Cablevision and Marcus Cable submitted an Application for Franchise Authority Consent on FCC form 394 providing certain information with respect to the parties and the proposed transfer; and C f:\files\slake\ordinance\cable.fran Page - 1 7/2 -3 Lie WHEREAS, Marcus Cable from and after the date of the closing of the transactions described in the Asset Purchase Agreement, assumed and agreed to perform each and every obligation of the Franchise. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 That the sale, transfer and assignment of the rights, responsibilities and benefits of the Franchise from Harron Cablevision to Marcus Cable is hereby permitted and approved. SECTION 2 That the Franchise is in full force and effect without default thereunder by Harron Cablevision to the date hereof in accordance with its terms and conditions as set forth therein and that no breach has occurred or is continuing under the Franchise. SECTION 3 The City of Southlake, Texas waives any rights of first refusal that it may have to assume the Franchise upon any transfer contemplated hereunder. SECTION 4 Marcus Cable may, at any time and from time to time, assign or grant or otherwise convey one or more liens or security interests in its assets, including its rights, obligations and benefits in and to the cable television system and the Franchise, to any lender providing financing to Marcus Cable. Any assignment or transfer by a lender or as a result of foreclosure will require the City's consent as provided in the Franchise and the city charter. SECTION 5 The consent to transfer herein provided shall be effective upon and only effective concurrent with the closing of the transactions described in the Asset Purchase Agreement and the subsequent transfer of the assets related to the Franchise to Marcus Cable, and Marcus Cable shall notify the City of Southlake, Texas promptly upon the closing of such transactions. C f:\files\slake\ordinance\cable.fran Page - 2 Li SECTION 6 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 7 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 8 (imeThe City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 9 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 199_. MAYOR ATTEST: C., CITY SECRETARY f:\files\slake\ordinance\cable.fran Page - 3 7,' - 7 (re PASSED AND APPROV ED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 199_. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: (tior' City Attorney C f:\files\slake\ordinance\cable.fran Page - 4 7i2—? City of Southlake,Texas • STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-032 PROJECT: Site Plan - Gas Station/Convenience Store STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan of Gas Station/Convenience Store on property described as Lot 6, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1, and being approximately 0.918 acres situated in the A.A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 522. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the intersection of North Peytonville Avenue and West Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). OWNER: Southridge Center, L.P. APPLICANT: Southridge Center, L.P. CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use(may include office buildings,hotels,and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial (same as in CS, 0-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, and B-1 districts) NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) RESPONSES: None • • - P&Z ACTION: : April 30997; Denied(5-1). - • ' •. • • • COUNCIL ACTION: April 15, 1997;•Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table to the • • May 6, 1997.city Council meeting. May 6, 1997;Approved(6-0)Applicant's request to table to the May 20, 1997 City Council meeting. L �1 �3- I City of Southlake,Texas STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all items in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated March 28, 1997 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated April 11, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 16, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-032SP.WPD • Li/ WI1VS1D �L�L �i 5400 TbMer SECHREST (214)745-5400 1201 Dallas, (214,745-5390 75270-2199 &iV111V ICK A Professional C«poonion Lmu AS 1iousroN Ausnr Attorneys&Counselors Maxtco Orr Direct Did: (214)745-5274 bknight@wlnahnd.com April 30, 1997 Southlake City Council c/o Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Case No. ZA97-032, Tetco Convenience Store Dear Mayor and City Council: The undersigned represents Southridge Center, L.P., the owner of the property on which the Tetco Convenience Store is to be located. As you will recall,the City Council asked Tetco and my client to consider altering the architectural design of the convenience store to allow for a pitched roof and masonry (stone and stucco) construction. Teteo's architect is preparing an elevation showing that proposed design. We will be present at the May 6, 1997 City Council L. meeting to present that elevation and to get your input. We are still exploring the implications of moving the site plan back 12 feet to accommodate an additional lane of traffic on FM 1709. We have met with your staff to discuss this issue. We were told today that the water line at the north end of the TETCO site has been flagged but the easement location has not been marked. We are in the process of determining the impact on the water line and water line easement of shifting the site plan back 12 feet. We have also discussed the financial implications of the additional right-of-way and construction costs with your staff and will be discussing those matters further with them. Therefore, we will likely be bringing this matter back to you for final approval at your May 20, 1997 meeting. My client.and I will be present at the May 6, 1997 meeting to discuss these issues with . you. Please feel free to contact me if you.have any questions beforehand. .. Very truly gdurs; WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICK P.C. ' . - • By: Barry R. 'ght '! BRK/lkb Enclosure r cc: Joe Graham L John Farrell REC� MAY 1 19 97 ..- 78_3 R. VICTOR BLOOD, JR. D Architect • Planner • Interior Designer 530 BEDFORD RD. SUITE 216 •BEDFORD,TEXAS/6022 • (81-) 282-5606,FAX 282-3603 April 9, 1997 Dennis Killough City of Southlake 667 Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Case No. ZA97-032 Southridge Lakes Phase C-1, Lot 6, Block 6 Dear Dennis, Enclosed are seventeen (17) full size and (1 ) 11"x17" reduction of the site plan for the above referenced case. These have been revised in accordance with the March 28, 1997 Site Plan Review Summary comments. These revised plans are being submitted by Southridge Center L.P., the owner of the property. All correspondence, notification and agenda items should be sent to the undersigned and to Southridge Center L.P. at the address shown (hoe on the site plan application and the revised site plan. I discussed comments 9 and 10 with Garland Wilson, the new Fire Marshall. What we show with regard to these is based on discussions with his predecessor. We discussed why these are shown as originally submitted and he indicated that I should resubmit as originally shown and he will review them during building permit review. He will determine at time if additional firelanes and hydrants are required. Please notify the owner and me concerning the scheduling of this case before the Southlake City Council. If you have any questions about the enclosed, please do not hesitate to call. 'Sincerely, R. Victor Blood, Jr. Architect - Planner Enclosure cc: Mr. Jerry Donahue. Barry R. Knight, Esq. RECD APR 1 0 1997 SLATER & ASSOCIATES cogineering surviving L February 05, 1997 Dennis Killough, Planner City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Tetco Convenience Store Highway 1709 and Peytonville Avenue Traffic Impact Analysis Requirements Dear Mr. Killough; After teview of the City of Southlake's development requirements and the site plan for the proposed Tetco Convenience Store, I find that the site does not generate sufficient traffic to fulfill Southlake's requirements for a Traffic Impact Analysis. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Characteristics, the average peak hour traffic trip generated by each pump at a service station is six vehicles per hour. The proposed site will have a maximum of six pumps serving two vehicles each for a peak hour traffic generation of 72 vehicles per hour. The convenience store ( open only 15 to 16 hours per day) will generate 322.6 vehicles per day. Assuming that ten per cent of these occur during the same peak hour that the gas pumps generate, then the 2400 square foot convenience . . store will generate (32:2f X 2,4) 77 vehicles per-hour: The traffic,generated.by the two site characteristics is somewhat.redundant. That is, it is extremely conservative to assume•that.the 72*vph:and 77.vph are:: ' independent and cumulative.• Many of the convenience store users will use the • stop to-fuel their vehicles and many of the fuel pump users'willuse the stop to . make their convenience store purchases. - • P.O.BOX 16593 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76162 BUS: (817) 923-6102 FAX: (817) 923-6104 CIVIL*MUNICIPAL*SURVEY*AIRPORTS*HYDRAULICS*HIGHWAYS*TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC*WATER*WASTEWATER* CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT&OBSERVATION Ltr-Slke.wps 1 2/5197 713 5 SLATER & ASSOCIATES engineering surveying L It would be unrealistic to assume that the car wash generates traffic independent of the above two conditions during the same peak hour. I believe that the car wash usage will be almost completely included among the fuel pump and convenience store generation. • Thus: Service Station Traffic Generation 72 vehicles per hour Convenience Store Traffic Generation 77 vehicles per hour Total Traffic Generation 149 vehicles per hour Two drive approaches provided = 75 vehicles per hour per drive The fuel pumps and convenience store together total 75 vehicles per hour per drive. The City's policy requires a Traffic Impact Analysis when a drive approach generates 100 or more vehicles per hour. Based upon this criteria, I believe that a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required. Please let me know as soon as possible if you do not agree with this conclusion so that we can proceed accordingly. Sincerely; SLATER&ASSOCIATES, E TER, P.E., R. .L.S. P.O.BOX 16593 FORT WORTH, TEXAS . 76162L.- . BUS: (817) 923-6102• FAX: (817) 923-6104 CIVIL*MUNICIPAL*SURVEY*AIRPORTS*HYDRAULICS*HIGHWAYS*TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC*WATER*WASTEWATER* CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT&OBSERVATION LtrSlke.wps 2 2/5/97 713-6 _ . 6078 Q.1VAill PI %,irdse.untmoo • , ,E2 ,G2 ThEs-1 i 50 • d. i.,.,.. i I---'':. ---1 i I IN 1. i I 4 iiiiiii II 1. 1 ! 3,, I -.59 IE 1G4 i 1 i 1 - / i ,I , . '4% ! ! ! ! 1. 1 \ J r' cize gif; .) 111)1141)1; . }-67ErePbu: ',Q-- 0,10 ' NW I i 28 ......... ! ! ;....vi ........r.---e-l ...._.;• E.4 4.- ,S110 APr. L .1=1 i.r,Z.Z.•=1:01 Ilii. 2AI __.-• L' '5• % 1._ 4. -.,...' 26 ..,' - k ",./ ! ,•14, :e"'--IN f---. .-•-• : . ! 3E ID! al 6A2A ., i .'" --r.-ii --. .',/ •-' i ‘. ,. .__._ -----1.--- 12111. / IA( ifrail r ir- it-r7- 17-17.-- i ‘ illL ! ... \ t• . ,,„„,„:00# -1.43,9 -• !G. i k - -1- • . 1) ! 1 .0 1171 , 1 \ iivAvA • •• .1..--1 .., ,.., , _ tic 6A . j A tii VI i i i i • •. i •k 1 \ Jr....-r- i i_--- ..-. • . % ,. % .•:.,- . -r , ! A . Afir-.--' i I Vkor i ! ! • i i_i_ ', % •/-"re::..i-Ar-r----I-, i ! i% _..., ' ii ! I 34ezzieldFlOri, ! i .. . ,•%•• %. ., a ... \ i i , %. %. \ , i .%; ER 1 i Vr ! ! ,•-•-, %. y • - ' ! ! , ..-- y- , , , , - i , -. 17-1 ! ...-k • i - , , ..I..._ . %, . ,... i . : yt. 651.11...ri of: i 11C2 1 1 c2A 11C2 ..- \ r 6AI 1 i IAIAI • i . ' -----1--Z. \ -/ / i i i , • p "T '- .. . .,_. 1 ,.., ..?'•••.......,1./ • i i ! \ / i A A , •a• ( A „," , 6812 IIIIIII MB ., 281 i I 1 ,,z• .." I--- ' , '`• 4.74, / FAI ''.. • ! _._g ':',./I) ( 1AIA --.-. -AO *-0, , . i i •.,.. 2841 26 4 284 latiliall 0 IAIAIAIA lAIA MIAMI*.1A1A2A .* " •-'....1 - ___ 686 Mit i 28 2C 2 2D 2E 0, ". f ‘ . ., 2640 2B4E ---1--1-• / 1A1A2F ---- ..:1-.0 ° '4/ /L'y--t--1.-- ••-.. • i - . a 685 11E14 . f.001.,NM ! 1 i ! ! 0 --- i j '‘ \ !• •41"1110. I I .1 ''. 1.11,4i*-' ' • , , ii ; iiiiimi c 1A1A2G,.e...,ril.r 'Pr! ! . ....._ ....e•-•-•1A1A3 2CICI v - --i--T.1-•-.4.... ' J., Air ------ ----- .. i : ' .P. . --N,' eimt. ..... ..., KELLER a railit al __..-i . 1 .‘. •,.„.-., ";% ''...{./.,:e _ --r---02.11...:. s';-,Litj FIREL v, E.ri:,.;.. ..---------- ..-- 2. ...e.,,,i,i-,•,. .„,,, --- - --- z !, : 148 g iiiii-T - El-.1. ,- -CNITER I !, \ .7 •--- --2c'a ' c' . \ • • ' . ' i - ' .---4--„---rrt• 7-1.4.--t,4k --. 1 'I SLIMY A-519 le •.)..k.s •:"....)...4. ?i i % 2 3 1 oftf) (...., ..,, \ - i -4-- 2.7.• r . - /..4...1-\\ Milli ----a 9V4 • •. ..., -% i I 99 -----, ..---. 0 ..\ -..,4., "s..`• .". . 2A1 •-...40/-i ."4„ .s- ., ...j. I ••• , 1 X A i 41/4_,A..•"1:-Ics.‘ ••••••••)' 0.1) _.. . ,.ii 1' 1E 961 .... 1E1 IA ‘12‘ / i i , ‘ : . , , ..A. / % .1 1 ! • . ! i. iii ; rc,...' , A -r-r.-*". •-,...i.„...1,-.4...e , •--- "s. ' ...... ..," ..., $! ! ..7t,„li• . I ,... .' .-•1'• •..s.)1.. `.. 9C1 .' - '-.. - .-; 4,4,, ..„.,.-- -• -c•-• - ‘,-, ..e--- \ i i 11114• 41!!owsoolow,,,_ A - , 60 Ac h. i HI III Pt i i 711rxiii caw. 102 lk - -- m-4- - l' x..- . • 1E11 103 ID ,ar'•,,.. ._ I _j_..... : q I_ -41-17-1-0-4- •• f 6.or• „. . 1 r- 3 1 a , P I V I. t : i I i i V U,8A28 ER i , , - • , . - !- .0''‘' 'V .,... I. ...'II?. .. 7.8 Ac y, II..i • i ko"! _.. . x....c. 1. ..t. fr.,:_-• .z.,:l•--.1- i \ . . - /- 4? :-.. •-•1....-• 4144 Q,ro . .. __ice._ Iv..., s.-- .4,. • .k. • ,....., )..,:i„.1.‘.4 ' c' -' Ix --- k . . \ ,.•-•- 1 : cr........,...-:._.., • / 1 .?, " :-' • .0,1 ; ........._.ii L •.--- , i ! --r --.L._.,r.N oil _ --:.. A ' PP. 9.64 A-1 1 t .-41.43-Air liar i •.."1" . •I\ ,t • t • :150ii • -ti ; --• --...f --i .--.Li; ••-• i ,,, ...... ,- ....i ...0-!---- ,1 r•- ; i,,oaree ....." i i i i g -- ' it i \ ---,a f..ItP... ( 381 ( 1.4 i 1/.1.s'r-t,•:" .4 .--.-:3 _ 1.5 Ac 3.5 Ac E - 5 .; WV Min -- ...• -4,166--- .-.1--r. j . / .-i1.- 11.----1 i 1 I .. i•-• •-7. .1 X 1AI 3 r- Lib i% r i;,10 • i 4 • ._.1..k.-.-1: IA ,44101 A Wn' ' • a 00' IA 1A‘:::: 1 j...i • : i • '''lAa . • . AI A - -4 . • ,C. •;".k. : 'OP - ' 1 CA "Cii4 • _•• . •-•k". ''•L. 0 ,p .A .-"k. 0 1013 1!1.4 0.."7-: • T.• : 4 A d'•1 •• .. • •. 20 At . X2A. •' .-771'.1*. .1.•••" -A.•'''.• X. ..,* .:21)• •.1... • egrA . i , - 9e-rrio14 i • 3. . :, 1' I. • , . . - - 6...- - -...-1., ,..•1•••'-. - ..-..% 9, 2D . ----- ,--....". . • - - - i---1 i..... ADO ---- .....f. . . tAI'V' ...1., .- ...i.- % 2 t). L.. .2E . . • 133 • .-.--... .. P . •0....,., . ,, ..kr.s..\-. .- I,. ._ •-s:- !,..-- ____ 4 --I.. , 9:3 At 3A . X• i Y. t.'-''.•' if"''',,,,3* - • i/", --- .•I • ..-.4-±- --i-' ,i .--4 . .• li .7... l • .1( Vil. EAVES - - i .__. - r . ‘ .,..- , . . \ , r., __off . 06. -• AT. -...-, a.J. PADENI- --,- ,L. 4 -.1--÷4 • . • .‘ ',i, 4,1 1 0.. . e`• • • 05 ' . ---'Cit4. • . • . , RANEY A-1 25.5 .1•"*. • • . 3i.• •••)4, • -...t. i I , , 11021 "k.\e')•.': 964 ' 2A1\ 2A5 ---1+...... 3A i 6 A' 3C '`....:' '.414'-,.r',,'.,s,"'.v..i 3':! i. T'.'',,.';„4..I_:•1-,v.i..,..‘1..4•..4.•-.....a•. ,.,.-.•,'. - ---.3A ,.. E 4. . ••::„-, .- -;ki•-,.?., / .,. 4.-• .... i - . ,.p ..,1 ______ • -• '4. • ;--1,:' ,. '.. • . --,t•-c- ,,,-. \,.. , .1 2A 2A6 eft K e"s' 30 ::1‘..-• ' "ii ',A•cf.A 4_0 - ' Y,--. . -4 .'• -r0 1 • • • . --- .--'1‘i •G B.• ._ -K5g gilk•• • 38 la - •..... • x, 2A4 ' ' 6 At / i.'s.t.'.• .%. ‘. 1,-- •-f. • • • ./ . • -_i -A ... • -A • - 1 ,----- --1 • c) m 2B-i---. , [ ] ___ _„,, .,,?....t.R ..., _i_4.__r_47, ? ..: ., * ._ . .,_ . ...T • - 2 : •-F-.11 ' ir? , 01.1,_:-.i , - 5c, . , 1.40 . . ,c . .., • : • 122 :*--k--..i' •4(__ :'"N. . .-'1 -4. • " I = 1, • 5 Ac TRACT MAP . ...• • ii I i ATIII1.1r.I -.I I i I -.- • -- . It...:01 I I I • \ n',... 1 I ., ..,,•.-• . • : -..... • sir' I \ ,I . . . i i i -, i-* I' sS\•.. i i .' - . 'i- . ---- •-i-• i-ri -..1-1-1- ' ,..• .A..`--.. '',. IA28 5 Ac ,,ma. _ ri -1- - _•_. 1 • -,- • - ' -N •THOMAS J. T.,-,,,..n ry pf.f-)lk N 7 21111101°1-L- ''': -1-- .-.' 1 ' ' ' •-•-• .--71\ " (-- a 11111.111min ,,,„ ! 1.4,i !, su„,„". A_,502 . . --- i.•__. , '... i i i ---7-. .-.I- --ri • 01,1 ' ' •-• -- . • :,\ ' -----,-.. tsto • -- r4--• . ,i, 18 .- ,..:00D 2A2 .' 8 go.ms:::..1.0, I ..tr" ._.--• . , st. . ... t 21 14 i /n 15 rd is 1.11 --------177 5 I x 31 49 50 s 4� t 20 \,,,, 13 ` 2 t 1 .,. G. �" 1 e R10N - "4 ,� D 6 I i 30 CT n r 14 1.7 b 3 �„ N 28 . 27 . 26 1 25 s 24 23 5 - ' o' 29 n - 1 �, /(`` . 1 ,, Ill 11. _ 11. 1M LK 22 20 �r • »o 1 I • PUD NO. 4— LA 1( s � 21 5 �D GE E. , u 1% RI �T� 6 3 g • t 22 x is aSI • s0 w TR iC x 23 CENTENNIAL HOMES , C3 7 1,1 1 1 1 5.165 C D x 24 G Z6 • M. NATAWALLA 955� 1.. I 1!f 4. 5 ' . 25 t t( ) _ ao .9 6_ l z .782 0 E . 1 1' VIN u. 1 13 us t —AI' •• C[ / 4 - 3951`9 ION SPACE ( FRED JOYCE-MARY5 E TR 10 H. MEYERS INC. DOE LADS ,,, 5.165 STATE OF TEXAS F.M. 17( Aisiti„. / N • TR "° 3E • ( TR 3G .915 0 ( 1». I • . . . Y L. CONNER 1 I SP-1 1 1 . .. . .••• • . C2 • 1 . • "0 "O 1 CARROLL ISD • 1 .. E 1.31 AC • •. 1 TR 3C1 I • a .69 AC 1 . • la . ;f • TR 3CZ. Y ; • 1.0-AC l CIO I Gg TR'3C ADJACENT OWNERS �j j0 . ,.0 A RpLL D jT .� AND ZONING . LAP • )0 - L., A JJ) • SPIN #13 JIM GOGGIN . / 1 1 E TRACT 2 t9?-3 n n- 73-a ) 5o RQ 1 A U Fix' [ r'� r. y,' j l +i !1ltill 4 '_ `;• b_ .4 ill 33 • 1 V tii v.e•'? i Vagri6 ilalilililllikka ‘7>. Ali „s lrsy I{t j�i { l'l� i $ - ,I! 0 II :� � viz!' 4 j U Illli •l .Eli + 1 1015.i�+ ] �r tt' is t t ! 1+y b .It j") , i PIA I Wil Vil A ilL Hi ii l ill 7 1 1111111 ;I ' $ �g g.! till I1P1 tr Lt •, t1L11 4 3• i,s 11 i A ' hpyi i t ;l Ill 1 ill !it !Ili if 1 k g 1 is W� E. a m E YE3 C ,�. SE CO F53j s .y-i I .� I 8 '4 _ni Ihwe lc) Ax v ,e '%-\...,,,,Is• i .4 i i IL ' j _. 1_221 J Iti I -- J -iii 1- Ii ! I Sp, I. ry- N II I j _ o �- ,�./ �9 GJ W t: _4 3 \111/1_i it 1 allk 1 Ill! 5[t � 'I 'I' +� Olt I I ebt A C 8 N • h Ali tp1 po gltaaasa ,a �j h., 3 8 Cr 1E04o .s., %. S 1 o-a o ai 9 # ....ii:. itil 1I .. 1 „E, ill 26 11 1. lig $ i ii• I hi. • liL.� .li.. ; k) ih igil41g C1 'till r Ili P:i g 1111dilil rill; gI1tI XY I e Q ' � ii"� ii � 1 1 i :t Ail .,1 igsst t s� �� tE It Op ! i 2 p.- �f T m f 1 11- .4.-,,, ix- , R § �1III 1.1711 g !?' 19 R ?, 1 : / , , , 1 •- 13 i Ia / // /� /a it iiik`----- i - 4. , 4 i X i _; t‘...4 I t - 1,j i ‘ ,,,, Lir ' / i _t A s44 1 i a i I I i. , kg g. —. fatrr---- ----- —1 sm. L I i in 4;11 / IR / g.' If/ :(r) . - ° ci 1 i' 1. it Le "I. h 1 441- 1 Idit i..' .\ (.., 3 5g • I j, , 11 =,!—, / . 1 al - a4 k\ '). I 0 I -i ..... V ii VI' i mm. • .,„ 1 .‘, kii a_ ,1 A * 1 k 1ii k/ 1! . 4 k 1st 1 T.) g o I id Ul W 1.1o . 1� �' 1 1 ----1 t. I - et i (1-;y...a : I .� �� i 11 Aew di l ' IIC 1 '. — � •► r+ 111- .s"" �,\� _ .ww�.rna"�a.JMO.v S�• ]! 'i hr I i v /_ i�t'll\►:� 1 Zumara :1i' 1 114 :t- • wv. a ,ro•xon. P ,:___ ___-_,I . . - i tl _------- _-- ------ --------------�-- 1[ oq r i- T � � R l i4!;. 1 1 iii hi ' ( 12e 1 01 iiii i 11 i iii PIS 75 — JG 1 1:r IN h .-I , iii i a. L iii irii n a it R� ni igiptr¢1r IS F£ li &II 6_ it I I ;1111 Of lit p i n-Di g4ril lfi f) q t 1 V ice. i i Obij ll 1 I'1 ii ll� 51i g- I I 11II li i g ii1 1 c ia 'i r iI a iI il _ 1--...! 1 . _ i i It f i I 1u %s'Ip 1 ' Ei ii ii I I - - - / 11 : i I, OW L.., if _. . .9 ...i..1 k ..... k,-1 '.__ Pi . - 1611plaiim, 1_ ' 1 li i ',. til , kI cI LI g 7 ___ 0 1 1 41m ,ri id • 0 le x IMMO Z `i> lrimdmip Y AA 1 II • ti I I NI.ICIIII. dill i p :�€ 9 fg IT - ' 4 mr 3 li. \, ih m , . ig li ___: t _. 10 : _ -AmimI\ 1.-1 I L 7B- LJ City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 97-032 Review No: Three Date of Review: 5/16/97 Project Name: Site Plan - Gas Station/Convenience Store. Lot 6. and a portion of Lot 4, Block 6, Southridge Lakes Phase C-1. being.918 acres.A.A. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 525 OWNER/APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Southridge Center LP Victor Blood 3838 Oak Lawn Ave. Ste. 1500 530 Bedford Road. Suite 216 Dallas. Texas 75219-4516 Bedford.Texas 76022 Phone: (214) 522-6400 Phone: (817)282-3606 Fax: (214) 522-6103 Fax: (817)282-3603 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT 817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Show the location of any proposed hydrants.Fire hydrants must be provided in accordance with City Fire Department and Public Works requirements 2. Provide fire lanes as required by the City Fire Department. 3. Provide vertical articulation in compliance with the articulation requirements of Ord. 480 Sect. 43.9c 1 c.The east and west building facades of the gas station/convenience store do not comply with the vertical articulation requirements as follows: East and West Facades are Typical max. wall length allowed=41' max. wall length provided=66' minimum offset length must be 25%of the longest adjacent wall length. * The east and west facades comply with the horizontal articulation requirements.The remaining building and car wash facades comply with the horizontal and vertical articulation • requirements. . . • •• • • . . • P&ZACTION.• April 3, 1997;Denied(5-1). COUNCIL ACTION: April 15, 1997,Approved(7-0):Applicant s request•to table to the May.6, 1997 City- . . . Council meeting .. • May 6, 1997;Approved(6-0)Applicant's request to table to the May 20, 1997 City. . Council meeting. • 7 — 12 • • City of Southlake,Texas * The applicant should be aware that all mechanical units and satellite dishes must be fully screened of view from adjacent R.O.W.'s and residential properties. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, an amended plat must be processed through the City and filed in the County Plat Records,a fully corrected site plan,landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water&Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the north and east must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement and a permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Victor Blood,Via Fax:(817)282-3603 Southridge Center LP,Via Fax:(214) 522-6103 L:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97032sP3.W PD C • . • p � t li f11t >`s,i.. :ib In f f ii l i isI ell(iii, 51i !! I! .I I . •¢ k — i _@,1 1 I 1r p PI I I i; its N ill! Jiii'i ! a J' 'i Ana i %f s ! ; II ! 1 f ;HI I / I IFFF �IL[1[ 1 % P it f li 1lil C Fill] tfii".. ;i 1 I Iti E i tea '.. ig II ii 11 it,t� ;„ lid 1 11 I" : i qfanii 41 / OF* -: k 1 1 / 4 J / �� -1� J f 1 ON 2 i )1' 1 .. / / / , ‘ , t ; i I / .i... / / / • Ok i 4 - �m -.- - -.74c. � ♦l 'h -.lip tc.:j 1110 //1 1 lkia;k1.4_ 01 ig- A'rk'', E i " III 0, 1 11 ii,' .7_,..\7,,,4: r 0.6 ii Nikk....v: 1 di.hbv —do .... / fi, . I ,tr o r, i ,a. . ,v„ , _, , s if, . 1 , 1j-t.. Id,,, (% („,„ I •ft '/Mouth ,.''Ili I \ 'II `, = i li cid it i V ii1 H i 74 '‘\'1. ' I'd �: �l � . I 1 pip a W L. _ R ;q ; I ,11 1 1 1 I 1 NM\k< 1 4 I ii a E J q.� �.J I I h I +941 , 1 1 Ul o A k i it.,; ;1 c_i__All 1 si:fr(C 1 . . . . ' iVWI ,�I. `',` \ \'�\ 'Zr '� n` `� .. hi !I I ill Fiji r i 11 1 E C , V I r.... I u C7) 01 I 1 cl 0 el 1 libe, .--4 .X in ill I fiew I 1 I c..., I1I' e cz_ fi 1 ii i I l i g-4•1 I ii ill glI d.1 4.../.• .... r ...... i glil li gl 0 > I g 0 pi 1 d 1 i + ++ + lc li . 1 i /I . I 1....1...c a. 1 ..li 11 bi 1 i II 1 ki i Rib r iiiE-7_l':-olnep,ai.m i4 Iivs i‘mI•..F.4,1i! 1 iN.i 6d IC1 46I6I 111h 1 i ;.„1 , ! -7 Ti i . _.. -,- .., r. ,.„,„ 1..,:, ,, s• i :AC ,Iiii1 ',,,‘ , i _ e ‘110, 1 wil I n Ili. . . I , j§ k!: il I 1 . 0-As. ...... A-. I MIIMIli __I T T If_ . , _ — I t_ -ar• rk, A,. 1 I 1 0 i i 3 p II 11 1 0 V 0 IP ki i ii 13" il 1 — • kil , ti I --4 la • ,,i : .. , 1 ! • Id k at ii 11 g r Ji 1111h111* s !,'' t " — . .. 1 . =--- <P IL ,..' - — 11 :.JILI 1 •.1,.. • 1-;u.,i _.4W'- .:,,Lt,r-f, f:_ • ' 2 , ri,„ .: I . ,Ili i di d C 113-ic) ..:.:.. .--, . . City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM May 16, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Requested Variance to the Sign Ordinance 506-B for TETCO Gas Station/Convenience Store, Located on the Northeast Corner of the Intersection of N. Peytonville Ave. and W. Southlake Blvd. Background Mr. R. Victor Blood, architect for the TETCO gas station/convenience store, has applied for a variance to construct a monument sign with a "readerboard" section. This proposed sign will meet all the requirements of the Sign Ordinance, except that the Ordinance prohibits "readerboard" signs. Ordinance 506-B requires an applicant desiring a "readerboard" to request a variance from City Council. The only portion of this monument sign that fits the "readerboard" description is the price sign. There is no additional area that will provide for messages. Comments Staff recommends that Mr. R. Victor Blood's request for variance of the City's Sign Ordinance be placed on the May 20, 1997, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE/cre Attachments: Memo from Charles Bloomberg, Plans Examiner Sign variance application Sign drawing Site plan Crow' 7C-1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 12, 1997 TO: Bob Whitehead, P. E., Director of Public Works FROM: C',harles Bloomberg, Plans Examiner SUBJECT Sign appeals for TETCO Convenience Store E. Southlake Blvd. At Peytonville Ave. Mr. R. Victor Blood, Architect, has,applied for a permit to construct a Monument Sign with a readerboard section. The Sign Ordinance as amended be Ordinance No. 506-B prohibits readerboard signs. The only"Readerboard"part of the proposed sign is the price sign. There is no area provided for additional messages on the sign. The sign meets all of the other requirements of the sign ordinance. Mr. Blood has requested this item be placed on the same City Council agenda as the Site Plan for this site so that the council can consider the entire package at one time. Mr. Blood will be present if you or the council have any questions. attachments: site plan sign drawing application • CB • 7C-2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE February 6, 1995 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION Lo' APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: vierio' M e-V. 7 -4, - �ONriegi 9 j � ,/T�/L 4-if ADDRESS: /-�� 'rEC.f-- F�:.0 r l"GO s'Td/ .r /wcc rnvf%o74"9 /1D SaCsre -zl6, �$7fi O,ox e-4Ah✓ Ad47. Srr'i5o0 /5t�--- d 7 - 7 z.- /246-6,"r 5zi1-- 15/6, PHONE: (Of 7) Z •Z- 6O 6v 4/¢) 5Z2- G--frcto FAX: (0/7) Z-52 - 36 a 3 &'¢) 522- iO3 The following information pertains to the location for which the variance is being requested: NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: 7 7 ' Gp tj// 7 )/r/t/G -- 5'722/ 6 PHYSICAL ADDRESS: /✓ Ce,(6,✓±- Df ./5 y7oru V/�L- VI / 74 y 6LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot Block Subdivision/ sl Tfl4ir'(0 L,d/pis /4lieS4 G-/ I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a representative at the City Council meeting who is authorized to discuss this request, criTess any unresolved issues, and approve changes, if any. icant s Signature: �G /J/Ll-- Date: S 'v - 71 ***************************************.**** ********************************************* For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the sign variance application and the appliction fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 199_. Signed: Title: ****************************************************************************************** The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 506 and amendments, and other ordinances maps,. and codes available -at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. V Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of 'conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached. ) Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R.O.W. v Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is ' Q., requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is. requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 7C-3 • 1 Demonstration Please demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the requested sign variance: ‘kar• 1. That a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant Price signage is traditional in marketing gasoline sales to the extent that many people will not drive into a station that does not display the price. People will drive blocks to save pennies and have the perception tha a station that does not display the price has something to hide, usually a higher price. The price of gasoline is not the same at all stations and can vary significantly from one location to another. The existing stations in this area were built before this ordinance was enacted and have price signage. Without this signage, this station will have a practical difficulty and hardship because it must compete at a disadvantage with the existing stations that have price signs. The absence of price signage will also deprive the citizens of Southlake the opportunity to price compare prior to purchase. 2. That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. This situation is unique to this property because the stations that exist have price signage. This is not self imposed. It is built into the sign ordinance without regard to existing conditions. Because there are existing stations with price signage, no site in the city can fairly compete without this variance. 3. That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. This variance will not injure or affect adjacent properties in any way. The inclusion of price signage in the monument signs will not change the location, setbacks, size, number, or lighting of the signs. It will merely allow the verbiage on the sign to be modified to reflect the current price. Not allowing the variance for price signage could potentially increase traffic onto and off of the site because many people when confronted with no price signs will drive up to the pump to check the price. 4. That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. In keeping with the spirit of the ordinance as stated in that ordinance; these monument signs (with price signs) would not be "uncontrolled proliferation of signs hazardous to the users of the streets and highways within the City of Southlake' and would not "adversely affect the safety and efficiency of the city's transportation network". As proposed these signs are one half the area and lower in height than the signage allowed by the ordinance. The information conveyed by the price signage can be read at a glance, without any undue concentration by the reader. It is very simple information. Pricing only, no other messages. It does not flash, is not distracting, and only those drivers that are interested will read it. The "location, number, setback, lighting and size of the proposed signs" is not greater than that which is allowed at this site without a variance. The monument signs will not "negatively impact the scenic resources of the city" and as designed, relate to "the spirit" of other site regulations. These monument signs have been designed with vertically stepped bases of the same stone proposed for the building facade. Signage elements have been selected that are of different sizes which allows the design of a sign with visual articulation. This is in character with the building facade articulation required by the overlay district regulations. 7C-4 • li WW —Ici , N ig ‘Iiiiirof WI) XZ i �-i II: -- J �'/ = �'n - ge o l O i -nncq p < 1- 820 WW II II II II � ZZ 9vO8^a � 5. 4 W ti- ' . 113 W WI- Z . (IO p O O --T--- Q �_ 0Z H � I- ILI IW Z WO ' c — _ 10 0 ki m wp kT) (y 2 Z 0L J �J--J �J t— < J (] J Z Q- W O 0 ® g ----- Q 0O IL 0O 0 111 J iii0 A a 4 '- \) _ � _ � Zkn —.—_._ -/ 1 111 Q Q N 0 Q -- cv - -Q6 (NI0 i i t- ._ - _' X Z Q z T v in 0 ------i i O ~ zz - Ul �� h Q } tolll I- JaZ_J _... - (T1 Z < 4 ___,_._ 1 0 11.1 5 in p 1 -> _, V 0 ..t sp ii IS (--- „Z � 1i Q O0 so (1,...., / CI III iu k 7C-5 • n W ‘11.- U s z I 0 I 0 0 r. V 14 g t Y N •.mn� •- gnoa O <Z U ri O 0 t p it h 111 �V .5P p A"nb Qi_ $ yg m • �&L VI— i aid OPta. ' m _y00'OOL__ a.LI.b:00 5 __—__—__—_ [Tp 3Nn eNicriinei,51 (TTh\ • L . , . _ . I ono �� 1 IU — l\I m u�� %u s + .., !! T FW ..0 _1 It n, 9 � N o INI 0 R z� ° I o IN I _ 4 1 I < , N o - - �l� ( o o».} m0 I -o ._:} ?tIl DIG 31 3NI sNla�lne.os r 15-7 1 t� I C $ Z;t ' HL AIM 9NIhVd.O,L9 F 00'OOL M .LI,60.00 N IN xi)/ O o " r . o< • AV 3TIINVO-LAid H1�oN g a Y +-.yq 1 r L • .. 7C-6 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 16, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter into a Commercial Developer Agreement with Southridge Center, L.P., for Lot 6, Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 Addition, Located on the Northeast Corner of the Intersection of North Peytonville Avenue and West Southlake Blvd. Background Southridge Center, L.P. is the Developer of Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 Addition. They are developing with TETCO,Lot 6,Block 6 which is the southwest corner of the addition that is located at the northeast corner of N. Peytonville Ave. and W. Southlake Blvd. The Commercial Developer Agreement for Southridge Lakes,Phase C-1 Addition is attached. The usual requirements for performance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow, and indemnification are incorporated in the agreement. The agreement contains some"redlined" additions and"strike-out" deletions. The deletions are standard paragraphs or sections which are not applicable to the development. Council should note the following: • IV. OTHER ISSUES A. Off-Site Sewer Developer will need to construct a sanitary sewer from the north side of the • addition to the proposed Developer on Lot 6, Block6. The•Develbper has not submitted said plans-for review. .Therefore,:actual construction of the ' • • development will need to:.be contingent upon submittal of final construction • • plans and review by City Engineering Staff. B. Off-Site Drainage : .. Developer will need to construct off-site drainage from the north side of the addition to the proposed Developer on Lot 6, Block 6. The Developer has not submitted said plans for review. Therefore, actual construction of the development will need to be contingent upon submittal.of final.construction plans and review by City Engineering Staff. . • 7D-1 CURTIS E.HAWK Liy, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT SOUTHRIDGE LAKES,PHASE C-1 MAY 16, 1997 PAGE 2 C. Park Fees In accordance with Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 7.0, the Developer will need to pay$459 (0.918 x 500 acre). The acreage for the plat may change upon the replatting process which will impact the final Park Fee. D. Cost Sharing for Deceleration Lane on F.M. 1709 (Southlake Blvd.) City Engineering Staff in consultation with our traffic engineering consultant and CISD's traffic engineering consultant have determined that a deceleration lane on the north side of F.M. 1709 at Peytonville Ave. is necessary. Likewise, future lanes will be required on the south side of F.M. 1709. • The attached "draft" of the Letter Agreement provides for a solution to accomplish the construction of a deceleration lane for westbound traffic on F.M. 1709. The Agreement will be presented to Council at their work session. Staff has worked to develop the"Agreement" Law, for two reasons. First,the plat for Southridge Lakes,Phase C-1 Addition has been finalized and filed,therefore,we cannot require additional ROW. Secondly, because of the existing traffic problem at Peytonville Ave., a deceleration lane is required. Therefore,the following actions are recommended: 1. The City will acquire the 12-foot by 200-foot strip of ROW fronting Lot 6, Block 6 for$28,800, 2. The City and Developer will share the cost of the construction of the deceleration . lane i •n that the:City shall• pay the construction costs for the deceleration lane adjacent• . . • • • to.Lot 6,Block-6,a 200-foot section;•and,Developer shall pray the 6onstruction costs . . - for the,deceleration lane adjacent to Lot 4, Block 6.. Total cost of the deceleration • lane is estimated by Developer,-and City Engineering Staff concurs to be $30,000 to . $35,000. The City's share would be based upon the final bids,however, it should be • ' - in the range of 50% of the total.cost. • 3. Developer will deduct that portion of the ROW adjacent to Lot 4,Block 6. 4. The City shall process the replatting and pay all costs associated with replatting Lots 4 and 6 as necessitated by the dedications of ROW for the deceleration lanes. • 7D-2 CURTIS E.HAWK Looy COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT SOUTHRIDGE LAKES,PHASE C-1 MAY 16, 1997 PAGE 3 Recommendation Staff's recommendation is that this Commercial Developer Agreement for Lot 6, Block 6, Southridge Lakes,Phase C-1 Addition be placed on the Regular City Council Meeting Agenda for May 20, 1997 for City Council review and consideration. 3 BW/ls attachment: Developer Agreement Plat Exhibit M:‘W P-FILESICOM M ERC I\SL.0 I\DEV.AOR.M EM • • • • 7D-3 SOUTHRIDGE LAKES,PHASE C-1 ADDITION (LOT 6, BLOCK 6) COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 05-20-97 An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the undersigned Developer Southridge Center, L.P., hereinafter referred to as the Developer, of Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to Lot 6, Block 6, Southridge Lakes,Phase C-1 Addition(a commercial development)and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the public facilities to be constructed by the Developer,and providing for payment to the �.... City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the subdivision if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds should be approved by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at'a • • . rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed.by the Developer • 'and:accepted by the City. .Performance and;.payment bond; letter.of credit or cash •• escrow.from th•e prime'• contra•ctor(s) or• other entity reasonably,acceptable to City, • ' . • hereinafter referred'to as Contractor,.will.be acceptable lieu o f Developer's obligations specified above. • C..: The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or. • cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2)years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the.subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash • escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the • • City-will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. ' • 7D-4 D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City and Texas Department of Transportation, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove,which are intended to be public facilities, shall be vested in the City of Southlake, and/or Texas Department of Transportation and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire agreement shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative,provides Developer with a written acknowledgment that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent(3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; . • c. • Trench testing (95% Standard); • • • ;.d_ The-.additional charge for'i• nspections.duringatu Srday, Sunday, • holidays, and after normal working hours; • e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; - • • • f.•• All gradation:tests,required to:insure proper cement'and/or lime stabilization. • 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: • a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); • . - b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and 7D-5 c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. F. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen(15)days written notice, should the Developer fail in this responsibility,the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas,provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City of Southlake. • J. . The Developer agrees that•tliecompleted project will be constructed,in conformance - • • • • with the Development'Site Plan; Construction Plans andfother permits•or regulatory • ' authorizations granted by the•City during the development review:process; • • - II. : . .. FACILITIES: . • A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer lleleby agrees to install wale]. 1aeilitics to seivieG loth a5 Jllowli on th 1 , - • - by the Devclopci s GiigineG1 and 1G1GuScd by the City. Pult11G1, t11G Dcvelopei ag1Ges to complete this iiistail-ation in accordance with Oidinance-No. 170 aiid shall be • 7D-6 responsible-for all-construction-costs,-mates ials-and--engineerilig. In-the-eventthat certain-waterlines-are-to-be ovelsiLdll-because-ofCity of Southiake-requiremeiitsT the City-will-reimburse-the-Developer-for the oversize costgreatcl than the cost of an 8" line:-Additionally,the-City agrees to provide-temporary watei service at Developer's request-and-expense, for-construction, testing and-ill igation-purposes only, to individuaHots-during-t11e construction of buildings even though-sanitary sewer service-may-not be available-to-t e buildings Water service is available adjacent to this development. Developer or his/her contractor will be liable for all city permits and Impact Fees. The City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning,permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C Ifappi , C-1 Ad ' ' , collfoiin to the requirements-in-Ordiiiarice No. 217. Sheets-will-he-installed-in accordance with plans and specificati ,: •..and-released by t•he City Eugiircci. • .•• • 3 1 T t • - . •• • •.of stieet:liglit,s,,V) ,Iimtalldtiou of all sti cet signs d srglratrllg the licunus Of thle- • • • Sig'11 • s 1 Approved by the City aceUld'aiiee with city ordinances. c) Installation of all regulatory signs • . recommended by the Maim s and a, • ' . . : . - of blii,Works. • . • 3. All-street-impr on and-approval-by-the C • wate1, 5 , • installed within the street of within the sheet right-of-way will be completed prior-to-the-connneiiceurerit-of street construction on the specific section of 7D-7 street in- which-the-utiiity-improvements Have-beerrplaced-orfor-wllikh they are-programmed. It is understood-by-and-between-the-Develupei and the City that this I equil eilient is aimed at substantial-compliance-with-the-majority-of there-planned-facilities.. It-is understood-that-in every constructionpinjec e tei may be made-to realign a line or service which may memm duel l.ulisllaction has commenced:The Developer-has agreed to advise the City Diieetul of Public Works as work-c iistiaction or stability. C. D ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service Lot 6, Block 6 as shown on the final plat of Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 Addition to the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs,materials,engineering,permits and Impact Fees. D. Fz EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the-Developer's responsibility to present to the . • Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented. • for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is - sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer,the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the • : _ .soil from the affected areas. 'If-the:Developer does: not�remnve the soil•within-.72 • . • . " 'hours,the.City.maycause the soil'to beremoved eittler'by contract or City forces and.. • place the soil within the subdivision at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the • City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. • . • • • • R AMENITIES: • accept-responsibility fiii the wiistiu.Aiui1 and.maintenance of all such aesthetic Ui 7D-8 specialty-items-such-as-walls, vegclalioii, 5igiiage-landscaping-streetfurniture and and-lake-improvements-until sua,h-responsibility-is-turned-over to a homeowners association- E. G USE OF PI IBJ,I(`, RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting,etc., for the enhancement of the addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. F. H: START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer. 3. All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general • • liability insurance. • 5. A Pre-Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors,-major.Sub- • . Contractors,:`Utilities,and,appzopriater(ioyemnient Agencies, • III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: • • • A. INDEMNIFICATION • DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, -ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND, EMPLOYEES, FROM AND • - • AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE - 7D-9 • OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY ``— AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS),ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE,OCCUPANCY,USE,EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES, OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY,ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES,CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City . Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two-.(2) years.after:the•acceptance by.the.City of Southlake.of.the:completed • • • . • construction project, itidemiiify and.hold harmless the• City; its.officers,�agents, • servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of' damage to property and injuries, including death,to any and all persons which may . arise •out.of any defect,•deficiency or negligence •of the-engineer's designs and • • • • specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings bought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof,to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgments which . . : • may be incurred,by or rendered against them or.any of them in connection with. - • • herewith. 7D-10 D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects. In addition,the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date hereof.In the event the work is not completed within the two(2)year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense;provided,however,that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES: A. OFF-SITE SEWER: The Developer will need to extend a sewer from the north side of the Southridge Center to Lot 6,Block 6. Plans must be submitted and reviewed by the City prior to the start of construction of the development. The appropriate Sewer Impact Fee and permits will need to be paid prior to construction. upmeLits,• B. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE This,needs`to be as per the developer's engineers plans as reviewed.by City; C. PARK FEES: • The developer agrees to pay the Park Fee $500 per acre, in accordance with the . .' ..Subdivision Ordinance No.483, Section 7.0. _There are approximately 0.918 acres. in Lot 6, Block 6 which would bring the total cost of Park Fee to $459. • • 7D-11 The acreage for the plat may change upon the replatting process which will impact the final Park Fee. D. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585. E. COST SHARIN T OR D .RATION LANE ON F.M. 1709 (SOT'TTHT,AKF BLVD.) The parties agree to participate as per the attached Letter Agreement from Southridge Center,L.P., dated May 15, 1997. The attached Letter Agreement becomes a part of this Developer Agreement as if it was a part of the written text. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: Southridge men er, L.P. By: Title: Address: Date: ATTEST: • Notary Public - • •. Type or Print Notary Name My Commission Expires 7D-12 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: ��"' 7D-13 REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit(L of C)must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding$10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six(6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2)years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. •M:\WP•FILES\COMMERCIISL-CI DEV-AOR.WFD•' _ .. . - • • • �"� 7D-14 -15-19?1 es:rpm ds r a rya r..r� . vv V SOUTHRIDGE CENTE • L.P. 1 Fri TITO TURTLE CUM VILLAGE 3838 OAK LAWN DALLAS, TEXAS 9551945 t 6 ig., 1997 City ,, Hwy touthiske 6671 Carroll Maar Southlake, texas 76092 for Westbound FM 1709 at Perovivi13,Avenue Dear Curtis: Thiz egettantot(Agotemear) stall doomerd the agreement between SarIthtidge late LP. rSonthridgen end the My of Saith1ato ("Cityl concerning the cat p. the above idea:aced deoaleratioa Lenc. coneldezatioctt Southddgo aLitting if SSW ix the tic:v:1°9=ml of and the pctreltdoos in.this Agreement, a1a and the City vat fr, exita fate this Agreament goad reasanaNyeoopcsatc the erantructilm of the deceleration tape. wed.as FX "A" is a cog eglimate dated Apdt 29. 1997 =tared by Vaasa & Boyd,, Inc, The coat atf constnictlec #h dfx-pAerition lane as sad in the enclosed letter is approcdrentely S330,000 it,$13,000. The deceleration Ism salt be Ina to goverament standards. The deerigradon Ism will be within a toasonable time after =wad= 0f . Stuthridie' sh.an decliAte dagit pottra of the ht-okay. pay the- ,Xsis iibl i • : mod with the deoelarationL ftaxdas on it portion of Lot 4,Black 6, SsElouthridge Lakes Phw C•1 Additioto. es shown on the she p CSitt Mani attached bercto sad rase a pact borecot aMI P *11*,. • • The City shall peg,all costs sewelattx1 with.the construction of the hrt 200 feet of fmmage on FM 1709 adjaccat to Lot 6, Bioc 6, Smear:14e Lakes P 42 Addition as shown on the Sic Pk= The City shall soquire the 17 foot by 200 tbot strip of Lot 6. Al $12 per square foot, thst r -+moray has a cost of$28,8O0. 7D-15 85-15-1J r? m-a _ _ - - -� - MAT 151 1997 Vage 2 The City gall Frame nviodita par par&ir �fth v rrp 4 ea6 for the decctereinnLc •4 --• 1. as *lin sip int&space previdal to evidence the City of Settlisket concurrence to the . ;fit. Agrenzorn~ sib►, AAA`, &OM:LA= T.L.P. By; GRAHAM INVESINIEVIS, WC. General Prater $ ---. ice IL arahsm,tircsidea AGREED: t of . Br Curas E. Hsadc 7D-16 I 13I1101► -,"';;_� Nrld .' 4 �(� KOMI . qua 1 :f` . MIL wows §a3tN a�alal�tnos Is } j s r =IC i CD. " 6 I\ ^� 8 / 1�, !° 11111 /' 0st p li 11i I!_11 Ill i I i I I I iolgi 1 in 'Hill aagI i — — _- ---_ -- - -- Li-': _.. - 9!t I; I - ----=, f 1 ' 11 �t )_h_ i t 1 '®` ;+t iiEI I :a 1 1`1 I T �1, • lb s 1 , f I 1 1 in . I i Ise id 1 < 1 •,,v ', i ,,I II _ , . d6I� i�� I:� _ __ Id - Ill .1 R d iid1l"1 i ? cougc 1 " ;/ �4�� 1 ��I SII I II• w• it < i i t ii 1 �! /4" ri . 411,ill ii1 . I i1 \ „ I;ti hi d I 1 iI 11 ef _P. /y • l sit>' iil , III >� 7f/ iirldr � �- �` II milli' 11 • ithi �� 44,'rig .. .. ar r . _ i I' i1 i LI Ii •g ill II B SI i _ ,- �i ,I q\\\ i (( i.• _._.,,_.:.,_:__ .1_, .,:___1. 4 -....2 ._i_ . " 'PI I ll I 6 3r&V 3TMtg11.3/ • - -w r.r.s- fi I' iI ' ' ; I .. ' IJ i IfILt i (LI Is' I i`i 1-g I t,g ird t•+ lb I I1�� s ��i� lb i ail !l �� ia9 � � ill , I I I I I 7D-17 . . i ;iris Aa ..t.., N.,: . --, 1 : .. Fi . : / le. . Q A= _ ' ' 3 • • • ...,,,.: - ; :gi . : II� , r ; . 'l o Zg „ idIi 9/R Lai y I : ' Z C° 1 , jig C) i 1 , 'c i F. A 1 i e', -r:(2 0 R I Lif 81 ° II wQ - Ili / F4 i , _.1 (-3 I .1►,• i' ' t > CC . :1 3 , • :- • v ' 1 a--i 0_ a , / lin Iaal likr . / : t .:: 1-. .4. .. 4. 1 ._ I • . . ... . , � � V � aka* « : �oows.1`. . ::,.... ►;tsid:;' .. ... ...Pjv *it : + . ri. . II , )" "' ift Viil 1 ti .. If : . . ": z 1---- ,, Li - i • ._ v.. . . L., . aula NJ NUM i L ; I — I 1 000* pi 1 iklo 1414 I-1-1 4 1111160.4 b 1 ri , , ., . • , 1 , .. . ,, 1! , I . , ijOC) I _ISMit 1-- 0 < u... . 11- • • ... '1!!►i �V / C U t O wolf wow rievi"'w4• F..%aisf,► enurewvu :oC 3f1N3AY 3Th\NO.Ul3d . a tea+ �►s+r a rx.w rs�nr ! r, 7o-18 1 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT (1111.' May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-131 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-221 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Timarron Commercial, Tract II STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change and Concept Plan on property described as Tracts 3 and 4A1 in the Absalom H. Chivers Survey,Abstract No. 299; Tracts 1,2,and 3A1 in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey,Abstract No. 300,and being approximately 271.908 acres. LOCATION: East of North White Chapel Blvd.,West.of North C rroll Avenue and North of State Highway No. 114 OWNER AND APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: (ORIGINAL REQUEST): "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District for a Mixed Use Business Park to include the following uses: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "C- 4" Arterial Mall Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "B-2" Commercial Manufacturing District, "I-1" Light Industrial District,. "I-2" Heavy Industrial District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses 1(not exceeding 20.08- acres). . from the "RE""Residential Estate District, " SF-1A" Single Family . • District, "SF-30" Single Family District,and"MF-2"Multiple-Family Residential'District. . . • AMENDED REQUEST: Same as above,but deleting "C-4"Arterial Mall Commercial District, "I-1" Light Industrial District,and"I-2" Heavy Industrial District and amending the residential zoning category to exclude MF-2 and adding the following residential districts: "RE" Residential Estate, "SF-1A" • Single Family Residential, "SF-20" Single Family Residential, and• • • • "SF=36- Single.Family'Residential (see attached letter). • . Lar Per discussion from the Planning&Zoning meeting on February 20,. • 1997, Applicant deleted "B-2"Commercial Manufacturing. FIE LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use (may include residential, office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs) 100 Year Flood Plain CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Office Commercial (Same as in CS, 0-1, 0-2, B-1, HC, MF-1, and MF-2 districts) NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirty-seven (37) RESPONSES: (ORIGINAL REQUEST) Thirteen(13)written responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Hugh A. Martin, 1090 Primrose Lane, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor. • William W. Booker, 1100 Primrose Lane, Southlake, Texas 76092, undecided. "I would not be in favor of any sort of residential going in on this property." • D/FW-White Chapel Two Ltd, PO Box 700876, San Antonio, Texas 78270-0876,in favor. "Will increase the tax base! Good news for all!" • D/FW-Northwest HWY 114 Ltd, PO Box 700876, San Antonio, Texas 78270-0876, in favor. "114's time has come (finally)!" • Kathy B. Mussina, 820 E. Primrose Ln, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed. "People have moved out of Dallas/Ft. Worth to get away from the city life,traffic and shopping. This development will ruin the serenity of country life and be like living in Dallas again." • Ching Chang, 209 N Rockwall St., Terrell, Texas 75160-2616, in • favor. • Valeria Staley, 1030 Primrose Lane, Southlake, opposed. "This . - zoning gives carte blanche to developers to do as they please; I • feel.strongly that the land use plan should be specified by-the developer before the zoning change considered:" • • Edward Blevins, 2346 Eastover Drive, Memphis, Tennessee, in favor. "It's an ideal location for an industrial park including my property adjoining it. Thanks." • Gunnar and Frances Ragnarsson, 1080 Primrose Lane,Southlake, Texas, opposed. "I want a more detailed explanation of what will be built on this land. The concept plan is too vague and is • . essentially a "Blank Check" . -• . - . • • James Murphey, 1200• Whispering Lane, 'Southlake, Texas,. . • - opposed: "We are adamantly opposed to this broad zoning change. Our concerns include traffic on Carroll Street and the use•of the property adjoining our property." • Robert Morganstean, 920 Primrose Lane, Southlake, Texas, in favor. "I am in favor of the request ... but I would like the . `7c_z Primrose Lane addressed as it needs widening for traffic safety reasons." • Robert J. Birchfield, 1715 N. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas, opposed. • Terrence Mullaney, 1515 N. Carroll Ave., Southlake, opposed. " ... health, safety, & welfare of our children in three schools on Carroll; inadequate infrastructure, increased traffic loads, lack of a specific development plan, . . . " See attached comments. Four (4) responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • Kathy Larson, no address given, opposed. "Without a concept plan which provides sufficient detail for the citizens of this community to determine the proposed uses of the land in question, the design and purpose of these tracts of land totaling 530 acres could be left to outside developers who will take their profits and leave us to deal with the consequences of their actions." • John H. Larson, 335 Ravenaux, Southlake, opposed. " . . . let me emphasize that the broad loose zoning the applicant is requesting is not good for the city of Southlake . . . " Resident also sites concerns regarding residential lot size, zoning category uses, building height, and sanitary sewer plans. See attached letter. • Rhonda, LeRae, Nathan, & Lance Hight, no address given, opposed. "I feel that this development would severely impact my health, safety and welfare, and that of my family members." See attached letter • Charles and John McClesky, 1416 Whispering Dell Court, Southlake, opposed. " . . . as elected officials, it is your duty to act in the best interests of the citizens of Southlake, and since the citizens of Southlake have and are - making it very clear we don't want this change to be approved . . . " Twenty-six standardized (26) responses were received, all in opposition and with the same comment: "No'blanket' zoning without a specific purchaser or user. No entrance onto Carroll/Highland." Two (2)responses are within the 200' notification area. Twenty-four (24) responses are outside the 200' notification area. See attached copy of response. RESPONSES (AMENDED REQUEST) Six (6) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Sonja Callicott, 435 E. Dove Road, Southlake, opposed. "There is still too much of a blanket zoning request for entire section. I do not want a funeral home or warehouse within 50' of my property line." • Ching Chang, 209 North Rockwall St., Terrell, TX 75160, in favor. • H. Knight and J.L. Clow, 190 West Northwest Parkway Suite -7E-3 E, Southlake, opposed. "Because it includes manufacturing and uses that require extensive outside storage of equipment and supplies. We do not believe that those uses should be placed in this part of the city. We would,however be in favor of the request if it was changed to eliminate the uses that are marked through the attached Summary of Zoning Symbols and Permitted Uses." See attached copy of list. • James Murphey, 1200 Whispering Lane, Southlake, opposed. "We do not want a street opening onto Carroll Street. There is way too much traffic on Carroll with all the school traffic." • Edward Blevins, 2346 Eastover Drive, Memphis, TN 38119, in favor. "I am in favor of NR-PUD zoning." • Harold Knight, 1749 E. Highland St., Southlake, opposed. "Because it includes manufacturing and uses that require extensive outside storage of equipment and supplies. We do not believe that those uses should be placed in this part of the city. We would, however be in favor of the request if it was changed to eliminate the uses that are marked through the attached Summary of Zoning Symbols and Permitted Uses." See attached copy of list. • Wesley Thrasher, 1955 N. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, opposed. "I still do not know what is going to be next door (ilhow the way it looks they have a blank check." • Terry and Sue Mulaney, 1515 North Carroll Ave., Southlake, opposed. Resident states concerns with safety, lack of information offered by applicant, and water runoff. See attached letter. One (1) response was received outside the 200' notification: • B. Dennis King, 205 Manor Place, Southlake, opposed. Resident states that, ". . . PUD's were never intended to be a substitute for good land .use planning." Resident also states that ". . . • Westwood should speak specifically to its plans.for the property . ." See attached letter. • Two (2) identical responses were received. Letter states concerns with quality of life, location, image, flood control, drainage, police and fire protection. See attached letter. • Gary S. Krall, 204 Sheffield Ct., Southlake, TX • Paul Hendricks, 200 Sheffield Ct., Southlake, TX P &Z ACTION: • October 17, 1996; Approved (5-0) applicant' request to table until • the November 7, 1996 Planning Zoning Commission meeting and • to continue the•public hearing. November Approved 7>•1996• applicant's'req uest•to table until (5-0) PP the January 9, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. January 9, 1997; Approved (5-0-1) to continue public hearing until the January 16, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. January 16, 1997; Approved (5-0-1) to table until the January 23, 1997 Planning&Zoning Commission meeting and to continue public hearing. January 23, 1997; Approved(5-0)to continue public hearing until the January 30, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. January 30, 1997; Approved(5-0)to table until the February 6, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. February 6, 1997;Approved(6-0)to continue public hearing until the February 13, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. February 13, 1997; Approved (6-0)to continue public hearing until the February 20, 1997 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting. February 20, 1997; Approved (5-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 1996 with the following amendments: Ler 1) the following uses shall be allowed by Specific Use Permit only- Gasoline filling stations ("C-1" and "C-2"), Lithograph("B-1"), Hotels/motels ("HC"); 2) one full access to Carroll Avenue for residents; emergency access only to Carroll Avenue for "B-1", "CS" and "0-1" uses; 3) 4:1 slope in compliance with Corridor Overlay regulations, measured from Timarron's property line; 4) fifty (50) foot bufferyard along Carroll Avenue and Primrose Lane; 5) three (3) to eight (8) foot berm to be located within the bufferyard, with a five (5) foot average height.; 6) open space. shall be an additional one (1) percent for 2-4 story 'buildings. and an: additional. two (2) percent for 5-6 story • buildings, per lot basis; • 7) no impervious coverage within the floodplain(including parking • lots);only trails will be allowed; . 8) 100' building setback, 200' setback for "B-1" uses in Tract'B'; 9) Pedestrian Barrier to be addressed at Development Plan stage; 10) "CS" and residential shall have a maximum height of 35' for residential adjacency; . • • 11) 20% of Tract 'C' shall be "C-1" and "C-2" uses, 50% shall of Tract'C' shall be "C-3" uses. • COUNCIL ACTION: ' May6, 1997; Approved 7=0 .sub'�ect. to Concept Plan Review • pp ( ) J P Summary No. 2 dated May 2, 1997 with the following amendments: 1) in "CS" Community Service District uses, delete #1 (public, `7E-5 semi-public and parochial/private kindergartens, elementary and (kir' secondary schools)and#5(institutions,rehabilitation and training centers); 2) in "C-3" General Commercial District uses, delete#16 (medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes and hospitals); 3) in "B-1" Business Service Park District uses,delete#8 (dry goods and apparel storage/distribution); 4) page DR-12 ("Development Standards"), change language to "It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall adhere to the development standards currently established in Zoning Ordinance No. 480 as amended and furthermore shall comply to all new ordinances as they are adopted for each land use category with the following exceptions:"; 5) page DR-15 ("Landscaping and Open Space: Landscaping"), change language to "Landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544"; 6) page DR-16 ("Concept Plan: Special Restrictions"), delete "C3 uses may not exceed 20% of the permitted commercial area."; 7) page DR-17 ("Concept Plan: Special Restrictions"), change language to "Landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544"; 8) show 300' setback from Carroll Avenue(hatch area); (haw 9) residential districts on 27 acres not to exceed one (1) dwelling unit per acre; 10) address White Chapel adjacency; 11) address one-half ('/2) acre residential lots (27+acres) in Airport Overlay District; 12) consider internalizing parking lot. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all items in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 11, 1996 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 2, 1997,with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated May 16, 1997. Please find the attached submittal dated May 12, 1997.. The pages • • numbered"DR" will.be incorporated into the final ordinance. • • • L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-131 ZC.W PD e811 135 6186 CARTER A BURGESS 05/02/91 09:44 P . 0021004 �%I- ►rip Carter :: Burgess • ConwllanI i, Engitieeiing, Architedwe, Plcrn:inr, cr•.d the Environment May 1, 1997 Mr- Greg Last City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southiake, TX 76096 Re: Timarron Commercial Dear Greg, Pursuant to the discussions held by the Southlake City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission during the Timarron Commercial joint work sessions in March 1997, Carter& Burgess has obtained information on typical C3- commercial development within the City of Southlake. Currently, as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Timarron Commercial property is limited to development of C3 uses on only 20% of the permitted commercial land area . Questions have been raised throughout the public hearing process as to whether this percentage realistically provides the acreage necessary for a quality C3 development. The following information summarizes those uses approved for the Timarron Commercial property and the specific restrictions recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Additionally, we have provided an exhibit that summarizes the typical C3 developments within the City of Southiake. We respectfully request that this information be distributed to the City Council members for discussion at the May 6, 1997 meeting. • Thank you, • CARTER& BURGESS,INC • , . • • • Dennis W. erke, ASLA Vice President DWJ1dh 97204401.L02 • • • • • Carter&Eyrgess,Inc. 3880 Hulrn 5tree1 Fort Worth,Texas 76107 7754 Mciing odd,rss: PO Box 985006 Cott Worth. Texo: IG 185.5006 (817)735-6000 Menu 429-0170 Fow(817)735 6148 REC'D MAY - 2 1997 8817 735 6186 CARTER 6 BURGESS 05/02/97 09 :45 P . 004/004 COL rn I. w v u u u' `.1 aAi a Y a ell L- a .. To; C7 y n C....,O O O U I- z V u 0= Av' G v' U a '" .5 • `z' K A K V o r t :El t ae t Zs O� d `v d S .,G W OV 00 A. d 6' Qo La Mo a NI v� NI II II t M N al tc6 a, N w a. C.) a M St.) r VA- V u u V d CO in U < U 0 U - e r -co h in y �/ C - C W • E Ii E II E W UV UV U X X OF E� V � U U V x x ..� Al m as F,,. �„ V tri .: .� ' ai oo as F. o e V f--� j o V � o G U . - U V L�i7 U ci V U F tr7 V U V '�' ri vT • F = �° 0 U 0 V - a e.- G V r 5 c aWi 0 • W -. v 0 W 'y O 0 — y s' 4.a a 0 A. a •p 0 a U _ _ vi • U U V • • O '* * .it .� " VJ p :H. � � 'a Cq. N .?O KV _ QQ - . r • wr -a o u .2 o aG d °° o a d m. V F- „la d = y a k N . d o N • _ - - - . 11111 1i blab CARTER & BURGESS 05/02/97 09:45 P. 003/004 OD CD r- 1 >- crC P U W L= u 0 z 1- o 0 r., cV v 1 V1 N C O R p0 Q� GI - . C/IGal Ica p ^ acl 00 VD" co 4.1 O t ,.., a M O Op Q QQ• Z 0 u Q ►Ti Q ¢ O N - — 0. d a Q < < to co) ; .0 o e rn eu �, � ao ,-; WI 1-' . o0 V U t) U C) O, 03 pp Q Q Q Q C p v O Q N O c� 0 d c N cv ccg • - bn (3 C cV No C v •C Hw V . C) •.. s - V c a la.O y a) cvato b Q V V o aa,, v CD v OCT-11-96 11 :40 FROM: ID: PAGE 2 L r October 1 I, 1996 1 Mr. Greg Last Comm'.nity Development Director City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 RE: Zoning Applications Timarron Commercial Tracts 1, 2, & 3 Dear Mr. Last Timarron Land Corporation respectfully requests amendments to the above-referenced zoning applications as follows: Tract No. I (Proposed zoning-SP-2 Generalized Site Plan Development) • Remove C-4- Arterial Mall Commercial District(Sec. 23) from the list of proposed zoning categories (161.• Tract Nos. 2 &3 (Proposed zoning-Non-Residential P.U.D) • Remove the following from the proposed zoning categories: • C-4 - Arterial Mall Commercial District(Sec. 23) • I-1 -Light Industrial District(Sec. 26) • 1-2 -Heavy Industrial District(Sec. 27) • Amend the residential zoning category to exclude MF-2 and, if possible, add zoning classification SF-20 Additionally, we have enclosed a letter from Carter & Burgess, Inc. regarding the Traffic • Impact Analysis requirements. .If there is any additional information required, please call. . Since yours, S v Yetts. E Development Director • • Enclosure • • SEY/kd . . . . . . .(46.0., . . Lastltr REC'D OCT 111996 C (1‘ ac)' The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Z N0 oniV 0 ng o5 996 mmission itia, as ►667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake Tex ' 76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 96-131 I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: \ aT,,,, k, 41_ c_-_ •r-� \ I Y\ �� . �CL„:2 � l SIGNATURE: __ 1515 N CARROLL AVE MULLANEY,TERRENCE C&SUS AN A (Please Print Name) /• , SOUTHLAKE TX 760924505 ADDRESS: /575-A/ -±,-,:-.At `a__ \te7eLtis2/_-_ C J -\)e--\ ' >2 ice. "`4— 1 S-tesL7 1 t LI-' 74---\142_ )Yll- - i-- 8--7A- ••>er--c--"V").-d-cit,- --\ tZ.T____4--- • \I � -k-Q- ) 1/1-Z,T-A------"4-- `c-.1 --Nt\--o k z__ 6f_., _ )C_____ .4___ .4ef"-z,t.......-mv __ S.)/k.,2_,?&_fru___ ) A-S-)\A-- f ' -41).___ VVZ,...,at-C4 . . ip .._if,,,,,,,,,,,s2,,c,,L6,2___ 0 . ,fikff.. if_______ Iec.___.2.: . 2 ,,LA-, cT 1/�- yv��1i� 11 tvLe �vt� s.7t :-tom 1.' /E kt,(__ _AA-L-10)\ rke__ v VVAbNI-e--4-- c4krx=D . . Se... ..),._. 1 • '1E_,, NOV-07-SG 14 :47 FROM:CONSUMER LEGAL ID:214S414001 PACE 1/2 cr/.0(0.12 • • (VIA)FACSTM II,E 817 488-9370) November 7, 1996 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake,TX 76092 Re: Zoning Application T imarron Tracts I, 2 or 3 L • Dear Commissioners: I am writing to express my concern over the request for re-zoning of three(3)tracts of land (currently zoned primarily for agricultural use) in Southlake by the above-referenced organization. Without a Concept Plan which provides sufficient detail for the citizens of this community to determine the proposed uses of the land in question,the design and purpose of these tracts of land totaling 530 acres could be left to outside developers who will take their profits and leave us to deal with the consequences of their actions The T marron/Mobll Group should be required to submit a.sensible,detailed plan which will provide their organization with , • a reasonable:profit while protecting the.property.values of our comity and keeping the. pleasant,uncongested environment homeowners moved to Southlake for. We believe the request for re-zoning requires additional study and input from the citizens of Southlake..Rampant development without adequate study of the effects of such•development . • on traffic patterns,.public health; safety and services, decreases in property values;etc: could turn Southlake into another Carrollton or Plano.-exactly the types of communities we moved to Southlake to avoid. We are not opposed to controlled development in Southlake which will consider the needs of Southtake's current population, however, we doo-not believe that the Timarron/Mobil Group C;DNOV 071996 • (lE-1 ) t JV �p/-bb 14, =Yb recuri.L.V1Vb VL•LCK LtI..ML 1V=GLY=YANIWW1 1''Ml.t �/le • • • (kW November 7, 1996 . Page :.. ..,::wVA'M{yMr.�.cr,.re,•.,,.,a.WA !s.," - ,�` ,.. ,' ,r.. ,.,; concept plan provides adequate information for anyone to make an informed determination of the Group's intentions. We urge you to deny the re-zoning request until such tune as a Development Plan can be submitted which addresses our concerns and provides sufficient detail to make an informed decision regarding this request. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, Kathy H. Larson • • • • • • • • • ckckckkol 335 Ravenaux Southlake,TX 76902 November 7, 1996 Planning and Zoning City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,TX 76092 RE: Zoning Applications Timaron Commercial Tracts 1.2,8c3 Dear Sirs: I am OPPOSED to the subject zoning applications for the following reasons. The applicant is requesting SF30 and SF20(i.e. 3/4 acre and 1/2 acre)residential lots. This is not in keeping with the low density development Southlake residents desire. Dense development places a burdern on schools and other city services.It also negatively impacts property values. The commercial uses allowed under this zoning would include a number of objectionable activities. Unsightly warehouses would be permitted. Toxic automobile paint facilites and pest control businesses would be permitted. Lastly,even pawn shops would be allowed if they simply planted a buffer yard. (tageThe height restrictions requested are far too liberal to be in keeping with the uncongested rural atmosphere so many of Southlake's citizens desire. In many cases the only limit would be"Maximum Building Height Per D.F.W.Airport Restrictions"_ These'restrictions'are quite liberal and could permit structures hundreds,or even thousands of feet in height. Also,such wording abdicates the Planning and Zoning authority of our local community to a third party,D.F.W.Airport,who has no interest in preserving the quality of life in Southlake. The sanitary sewer collection system plans in the application contain references to"temporary measure"and"temporary lift.station". These are unacceptable given the applicant's concept plan. The applicant's concept is to resell the property to other developers. The applicant would then be free to pocket the profits from the venture,leaving the taxpayers of Southlake to pay the cost of . ultimately installing proper.sewage collection systems. . • • In closing,let me emphasize that the broad loose zoning the applicant is requesting is not good for the city of Southlakc. Development is inevitable and if done properly,beneficial to the community. The problem with this application is that it asks the Planning and Zoning board-to • abdicate their authority and the interests of the crtizen3 of Southlake tora•developer.who's very • • • • . concept is to resell the property and.walk away from the comnhinity: '. • • • Sincerely, • r Z---�� John H.Larson •• • • REC'D NOV 0 7 1996 £9£:ON 20/20: rcl 6L=5L 96/LO/LL L58££££LLe S 21 SST lSNB O• Q00. (111111ble November 6, 1996 1 O Mr. Joe Wright Planning and Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake,TX 76092 Dear Board Member, . I am a concerned citizen who lives near Tract II of the Timmarron Planned Development on Carroll Avenue. I object to the development plan Timmarron has submitted before the Planning and Zoning Commission. I feel that this development would severely impact my health,safety and welfare,and that of my family members. I want to see a more specific plan before the Planning and Zoning Commission approves any zoning changes on this particular tract. I demand that the members take a second look at this plan before it is approved because such a broad zoning could allow Timmarron to put a business that would be harmful to my family and property values. Sincerely, itickb_ (hoick ((11IW • • RC'ED V 01�9 l ‘11111mre November 6, 1996 sOy Mr. Joe Wright Planning and Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Avenue Soulhlake,TX 76092 Dear Board Member, I am a concerned citizen who lives near Tract II of the Timmarron Planned Development on Carroll Avenue. I object to the development plan Timmarron has submitted before the Planning and Zoning Commission. I feel that this development would severely impact my health, safety and welfare,and that of my family members. I want to see a more specific plan before the Planning and Zoning Conunission approves any zoning changes on this particular tract. I demand that the members take a second look at this plan before it is approved because such a broad zoning could allow Timmarron to put a business that would be harmful to my family and property values. Sincerely, Aecte , ._)C L.,, November 6, 1996 Mr. Joe Wright Planning and Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Avenue • Southiake, TX 76092 Dear Board Member. I am a concerned citizen who lives near Tract II of the Timmarron Planned Development on Carroll Avenue. I object to the development plan Timmarron has submitted before the Planning and Zoning Commission. I feel that this development would severely impact my health,safety and welfare,and that of my family members. I want to see a more specific plan before the Planning and Zoning Commission approves any zoning changes on this particular tract. I demand that the members take a second look at this plan before it is approved because such a broad zoning could allow Timmarron to put a business that would be harmful to my family and property values. Sincerely, aiin, 6, 4# ,L... . . . . • . . - . • . . . . • . . . • . . .• . . • . . . ... . . . . .. . _ ••• • •• . . • • • " ". • • . . . .. . . . . . • . . . .. . • • . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . - L. .. . . . .. .. • , . . • • . . . • • r1G-/_7 November 6, 1996 \Y Mr. Joe Wright Planning and Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake,TX 76092 Dear Board Member, I am a concerned citizen who lives near Tract II of the Timmarron Planned Development on Carroll Avenue. I object to the development plan Timmarron has submitted before the Planning and Zoning Commission. I feel that this development would severely impact my health,safety and welfare,and that of my family members. I want to see a more specific plan before the Planning and Zoning Commission approves any zoning changes on this particular tract. I demand that the members take a pond look at this plan before it is approved because such a broad zoning could allow Timmarron to put a business that would be harmful to my family and property values. Sincerely, (laama 6 #70: ( (lbw • • • • cok -cs 4 a % a , e following form may filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and•Zoning Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092. ERENCE NO.: ZA 96-1 3] (renotification RED JAN 061997 ) I am ( ) (opposed to) ) the request for the following reasons: Because it includes manufacturing and uses that require extensive outside storage of equipment and supplies. We do not believe that those uses should be placed in this part of the city.- We would, however, be in favor of the request if it was changed to elimiante the uses that are marked through on the attached Summary of Zoning District Symbols and Permitted Uses. SIGNATURE: (Please Print Name) -J, mat, . J L , ez 0 w ADDRESS: KNIGHT.H&J L CLOW 190 W NORTHWEST PKWY STE E 760923612 SOUTHLAKE TX • • • • • • • • • - • -• • . 9E--/? • 1 13uS Pr inecc Q -yjce Park istr'ct: any use permitted in 0-1; administrative, executive, and editorial offices; shops; ; banks; barber and beauty se y; banks; barber and beauty shops; book and stationary shops; computer manufacture and research; dry goods; .electronic - aar h; funeral homes; printing and publishing; roan,lfarture-of ; medical clinics; nursery yards; optical instruments and lenses manufacturing; schools; professional and business schools; retail activity; ; security guard quarters; assembly; fine arts training studios; city halls; police and fire stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet. B-2 Commercial Manufacturing District: _,as a mernhandi e•tail establi t, automobile or motorcycle sales or rentals; auto repair/services;�� ry boat sales, services, repair; s; builder supply; bus station; DTP supplies; commercial warehouses; �mplPment sales nri sP janitorial services; min-warehouses; nursery ; frozen food lockers; yards or buildings; pest control services; �ppproodu..��ce markets; rental equipment; retail feed stores; -se 4 e; Te f Vt11PPC C tPC far•1't'P ; truck sales/rental; furniture upholstery shops; wholesale houses; city halls; police& fire stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet. kr' Light Industrial District: any use permitted in 0-1; aluminum product fabricate • armature winding; wholesale bakery; blacksmithing or horseshoeing ; broom manufacturing; cabinet or carpentry shop; candlemaking; candy plant; carpet cleaning; clothing manufacturing; cold storage warehouse; commercial school; compounding of cosmetics and toiletries;creamery and dairy product processing;egg storage, candling, sorting, and grading; electronic components manufacturing and assembly; feed stores; glass blowing; ice cream making; ice manufacturing and bulk ice storage; insulation application; irrigation sales and service;janitorial services; laboratories; linen and towel service; machine shop; mattress manufacturing or ' renovation manufacturing of medical and dental equipment; mini-warehouses; monument manufacture; ornamental-iron works; pest control businesses; plastic fabrication; plumbing, heating, refrigeration; or air conditioning shop; public utility facilities; pump sales and service;.roofing.contractor; sash and:door•mat ufg.ture;.:,. sheet metal shop; ..sign .canufactnri n ng;. a' . praiy painting shop; •store fixture • manufacturing and sales; warehouses;'welding equipment and supplies; city halls; fire and police stations; maximum height within 100 feet of residential is 1 story and 20 feet; maximum height more than 100 feet from residential is 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet; minimum lot size of 5 acres. • G:\u/PFILISTSIZONDIST WPD . 01-14-1997 03:37PM 817 488 6796 P.03 (1111W • Terry and sue Mullaney 1515 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 January 14, 19197 • City of Southliake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Reference No. : ZA 96 31 Timar'ron Commercial Tract II Dear Planning and Zoning Commission: We oppose theproposed Zoning Change not only for the capti•ned tract but also those tracts known as Timarrr n Commercia True is and III. while We understand the Commission is not responsible i-r ing policy we believe the zoning change process, as it curr tly exists} is not in the best interests of the community a- a wh le. It really should be changed, but that is another issu . We ve attended P&Z Meetings where other developers presente•' detaled plans, including actual end-use occupancies, "f••tprin s", elevations, drainage plans, buffer zones and addxesse• nat a1 resource preservation BPORN ZONING CHANGES WERE ' . . • ' ."' . The process would operate much more efficiently and effective y if thin ((low Was required in all cases. The safety and security of the children in the three sc ools on• ..g Carroll Avenue has been virtually ignored. Commercial development will only serve to increase traffic, draw transients - •d foster crime }.n a neighborhood that is now composed of churches, homeland schools. We have previously asked the Commission to deny vehi lar access! from Tract II to Carroll, Prim Rose and White's .. 1. . Please; do not'permit zoning that will imperil the envi.onmen of our children and our Blue Ribbon Schools. Waste water' and storm water..runoff issues,. should be caref ily . addressed . by ;professional engineers .before zoning c•= •ges ate approved.. It is :a mistake to allow zoning changes .wit.out t . knowing the full impact of increased storm water runoff - •• the additibnal load on waste water systems. . We moved to Southlake because of the schools and the. ass heti.ally . - pleasing. eeuti=rural environment:- We .don't want to live n or ear : - a-Lae`!olinae=.type.develop ►eat..-We' ogre; it.-to_ ourselves : •d . .titre generaaltiouu to preserve the .quality of -life in Southi. -e-: arge . scale,: unnecessary development will irreparably d.mage Our community'a unique character. The commission now has an o•port . ty to eldw development that is clearly 'too much, too fast . _ . REI'D JAN 141997 , 01-14-1997 03:37PM 817 488 6796 P.04 (kW' . (2) • Naturally, we are also very concerned that our property va uee 'lsl decline. Most pf the adjacent property owners have est te--s' p lots which desirve to be protected. Timarron'a proposals o bu e the surrounding properties are woefully inadequate. We p -vi slily asked the Commission to require a 350 foot setback for • .ild 4, signs, Tights and paved areas. we also asked for a 35' , 2 /2 s 4y height 'limit And that a minimum of 25% of the total a.reage be zoned £kor residential use around the perimeter. Timarrdn's motive is profit, pure and simple. There is no alt 'ism nor community spirit. The proposed sprawling development pro des no meaningful benefit to the city. There will be no eali tic property tax relief. The Fort North Star Telegram just a s ory about Grapevine's significant additional expense to provi•e pol ce, fire and intrastrueture support for the new mall. This i-n't in- win. It's developer win, taxpayer@ lose. What is the po t? Please :do not permit the legitimate interests of your c• =titu ncy to be Subjugated to the profit motive of out-of-town • _ el ris. Those of us who live here neither want nor need thisg mmer al development. • DO THEE RTGET TUINO. JUST TILL TIIMARRON •NO". • Sincerely, : ,,,.(,/(----.'-'''''-. . : (ow . . • / i: Wei, . • • • • • •cc: •Maiyor Rick Stacy City Counci • •l ... • i { REC'D JAN ,14 , 997 ,)F 22 nc cud Terry and Sue Mullaney 1515 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 January 14 , 1997 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Reference No. : ZA 96-131 Timarron Commercial Tract II Dear Planning and Zoning Commission: We oppose the proposed Zoning Change not only for the captioned tract but also those tracts known as Timarron Commercial Tracts I and III . While we understand the Commission is not responsible for making policy, we believe the zoning change process, as it currently exists, is not in the best interests of the community as a whole. It really should be changed, but that is another issue. We have attended P&Z meetings where other developers presented detailed Lpe plans, including actual end-use occupancies, "footprints" , elevations, drainage plans, buffer zones and addressed natural ( resource preservation BEFORE ZONING CHANGES WERE APPROVED. The process would operate much more efficiently and effectively if this was required in all cases . The safety and security of the children in the three schools on Carroll Avenue has been virtually ignored. Commercial development will only serve to increase traffic, draw transients and foster • crime in a neighborhood that is now composed of churches, homes and schools . We have previously asked the Commission to deny vehicular access from Tract II. to. Carroll,. Prim - Rose and. White' s Chapel . • Please do mat permit .:zoning zoning that: will imperil the environment of • our children. and ottr .glue Ribbon Schools .. Waste water and storm water runoff• - issues :should be carefully .. • addressed by professional engineers before . zoning changes are • approved. It.. i.s a mistake .to , allow zoning 'changes without first . • • . knowing. •'.the-•:f211.1. •impact ''pf • i icreased• stort1 water .runof€ and :the.-: additional• load on. waste water. :systems We moved to Southlake because of the schools and the aesthetically pleasing semi-rural environment . We don' t want to live in or near • a Las Colinas-type development . We owe it to ourselves and future . generations to preserve the quality of life in Southlake. Large : : • • 'scale, unnecessary. development will irreparably damage . our ..-community' s_unique character The Commission.now.has an .opportunity L •'' to slow' developinent•:.that is ''clearly. "too much, 'too- •fast" . RECO JAN 2 01997 ��- 23 (kw (2) Naturally, we are also very concerned that our property values will decline . Most of the adjacent property owners have estate-sized lots which deserve to be protected. Timarron' s proposals to buffer the surrounding properties are woefully inadequate. We previously asked the Commission to require a 350 foot setback for buildings, signs, lights and paved areas . We also asked for a 35' , 2 1/2 story height limit and that a minimum of 25% of the total acreage be zoned for residential use around the perimeter. Timarron' s motive is profit, pure and simple. There is no altruism nor community spirit . The proposed sprawling development provides no meaningful benefit to the city. There will be no realistic property tax relief. The Fort Worth Star Telegram just ran a story about Grapevine' s significant additional expense to provide police, fire and infrastructure support for the new mall . This isn' t win- win. It' s developer win, taxpayers lose. What is the point? Please do not permit the legitimate interests of your constituency to be subjugated to the profit motive of out-of-town developers. Those of us who live here neither want nor need this commercial development . DO THE RIGHT THING. JUST TELL TIMARRON "NO" . Sincerely, f(kble / ,,.)K (,24(6, i .itet • cc-: Mayor Rick Stacy - - • 'City Council 7E-2JJ u1/ZJ/ Ii 16:03 272148718656 ROSEWOOD PROP CO l 001/001 (libilif B. Dennis King 205 Manor Place Southlake,Texas 76092 Home-817/424-3094 Work-817/871-8605 TO: Members of The Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake(Fax 817/488-9370) FROM: 1 Dennis King DATE: , January 23, 1997 RE: Timarron Rezoning AZ96 130. 131. 132 Please be advised that I am opposed to the rezoning Timarron is requesting for the referenced tracts. I attended the first meeting the Timarron representatives held with various SPIN groups and was unimpressed with the presentation. It became obvious very early in the meeting that Timarron had not performed any land planning but simply wanted a zoning designation which would permit the greatest flexibility for them. I believe it would be grievously unfair for the City of Southlake and its residents to approve the zoning requests in their present condition. Please remember, PUD's were never intended to be a substitute for good land use planning. l (6110"' It should also be pointed out that Mobil Oil is no longer the owner of Timarron. The new owner is Westwood, which is a real estate company comprised mainly of executives formerly with Morgan Stanley, a Wall Street investment banker. The new owner, Westwood, should speak specifically to its plans for the property-not what it thinks or hopes will happen in the future. It is my understanding that Westwood is a "horizontal" developer and not a "vertical" developer. Accordingly, in all likelihood, Westwood will develop the infrastructure (streets and utilities)and then sell off the tracts as users come along. Each sale,if good planning does not happen now,could be a setback for Southlake's commitment to quality development and good commercial neighbors. With each sale by Westwood the residents of Southlakc could very easily find their quality of life moving further along a downward spiral until.that •- - - ' duality of life is only a distant memory. . . . • . Thank you for your attention to this matter. - . • • • •GARF .EGALiwoRDa80K19500ABDK9597.DOC. ,_ • ,• �.n `NN 2 31gg1• r/E-as January 29, 1997 TO: City of Southlake Planning & Zoning RE: Cases #ZA 96-130 #ZA 96-131 #ZA96-132 Greetings: My name is Gary S. Krell and I am a resident of Southlake, TX residing at 204 Sheffield Ct. The above referenced cases submitted for rezoning by Timarron Land Development are of great concern to me and my family. There are a great many issues that need to be addressed and looked at very closely before any further development is allowed along Highway 114. The first concern is a quality of life issue. My family moved to Southlake because it (L' offers peaceful surroundings, a low crime rate, an excellent school system, larger lots than normally offered in other communities, a nice lake access and less traffic than in the congested big cities nearby. Southlake did not have the drawbacks of many of the other suburban areas we looked at and it appeared to be planning for the future in a way that would protect this quality of life. The Timarron development as proposed would, in my opinion, detract severely from everything Southlake has to offer. . A concentrated commercial/industrial park with everything from" • - . , 1. retail to manufacturing, . • - • • 2. office buildings and hotels up to six stories in height, and 3. no definite buffers between commercial uses and homes or schools. • •••.All'these things Strike me as making all.the same.mistakes towns like-Irving,.Arlington, •• •Grand_Prairie and'Garland,.:etc have Made.in the past ,This'can..•onlywork .to lower the, . . • • . property values of our homes, add to the•crime- rate, create environmental'-problems and . increase traffic problems to an unbearable.level. Much of the proposed development will put commercial/industrial businesses right next to schools and increase the traffic on Carroll Avenue which would be a dangerous situation for the three schools along Carroll Avenue. Although I live South.of 114, I see- 114 as- the "Gateway" to Southlake. Any . . •undesirable development•will bring:down everyone,.not just those North of 114 or nearest to ' ikti..., REC'DJAN 301997 , (lkii., the development. The image for the entire area will be set by what is seen along 114. Congested, overbuilt areas will turn people away and ruin what Southlake has to offer. Issues such as flood control, proper drainage, police and fire protection, etc. must be addressed before the City of Southlake can give approval in any way to the Timarron proposal. The developer must be forced to delineate specific plans for each and every tract; otherwise Timarron will have Carte Blanche to do whatever they wish. Many of those involved have said that letting development happen will lower homeowners taxes. Frankly, I moved here knowing the tax structure and I am willing to pay my fair share for a high quality of life and excellent schools. I am not in favor of this type of development just to supposedly lower my taxes. I realize the land along Highway 114 will eventually be developed. I am not against low density, environmentally clean and safe businesses. But, Southlake must not let their golden opportunity for proper development be swept away in a flurry of ill-conceived development. Thank you very much for taking all of the above into consideration before making any decisions on this rezoning issue. IC-7 e_,e • • (16.0„ • • . 76-277 r' Lipe January 29, 1997 TO: City of Southlake Planning &Zoning RE: Cases #ZA 96-130 #ZA 96-131 #ZA96-132 Greetings: My name is Paul Hendrickson and I am a resident of Southlake, TX residing at 200 Sheffield Court. The above referenced cases submitted for rezoning by Timarron Land Development are of great concern to me and my family. There are a great many issues that need to be addressed and looked at very closely before any further development is allowed along Highway 114. The first concem is a quality of life issue. My family moved to Southlake because it ( (hoe offers peaceful surroundings, a low crime rate, an excellent school system, larger lots than normally offered in other communities, a nice lake access and less traffic than in the congested big cities nearby. Southlake did not have the drawbacks of many of the other suburban areas we looked at and it appeared to be planning for the future in a way that would protect this quality of life. The Timarron development as proposed would, in my opinion, detract severely from everything Southlake has to offer. • A concentrated commercial/industrial park•with everything from: 1. retail- omanufacturing;. 2. office buildings and hotels up to six stories in height, and • • • • 3. no definite buffers between commercial uses-and homes or schools. All,these things strike me as making all the same mistakes towns like Irving, Arlington, • . Grand Prairie and:;Garland;.etc have rtiade in.-the.past,' 'This .cart.only.work to lower-.the • • property values of our.-homes, add to•the: crime 'rate;•createTenviranmental .problems- and' . increase traffic problems to an unbearable level. Much of the proposed development will put commercial/industrial businesses right next to 'schools and increase the traffic on Carroll Avenue which would be a dangerous situation for the three schools along Carroll Avenue. .Although ,I live South. of 114, I. see 114* as the "Gateway" .to. Southlake. . Any. • undesirable development will bring down everyone, not just those North of-,114 or nearest to REC'D J AN 3 0 1997 r' (Woe the development. The image for the entire area will be set by what is seen along 114. Congested, overbuilt areas will turn people away and ruin what Southlake has to offer. Issues such as flood control, proper drainage, police and file protection, etc. must be addressed before the City of Southlake can give approval in any way to the Timarron proposal. The developer must be forced to delineate specific plans for each and every tract; otherwise Timarron will have Carte Blanche to do whatever they wish. Many of those involved have said that letting development happen will lower homeowners taxes. Frankly, I moved here knowing the tax structure and I am willing to pay my fair share for a high quality of life and excellent schools. I am not in favor of this type of development just to supposedly lower my taxes. I realize the land along Highway 114 will eventually be developed. I am not against low density, environmentally clean and safe businesses. But, Southlake must not let their golden opportunity for proper development be swept away in a flurry of ill-conceived development. Thank you very much for taking all of the above into consideration before making any decisions on this rezoning issue. ovvottluA,J-t - ' • • • • rJE aq 1 1 M� ,_.., I / 1 1 jL< ,. • O •: , I g _ U i o ' H- o 11A, jI , ; � � 'ros. 41 i' ti _ tt t i f 3: � O, i ' ► xf1� . 1 ■illi ur, — a l re4 4 `a'r ii r S ,ri vitim- ' Ic:. , row -Ti , >4(1— tt.ir IN., 11 Rat■ .,.. ...... 1 "ill \ __- - i -------- ,szt il 4cttl „. tr i '- �� 14-11 .-4., _ , i ,, /I 1 A - . 4-- ., kgr,ria.v Pairie 1 ...._- i , Fror - ' U , :_____ \, ____-s-.4 . . `f , 0_ I r , ,,,;11,1 . .. choi..-1 - , Birt, . . ., X ,- at iL,„ 0 1,■■{{ ' ..� Via` .� , . _ €Fei I w/ ill i • • i ;oTli 7 1-1 {---- . 6 6 Imili . "‘ IP i .'"1. . : i ' 4 ' • . • .. . . . . • L'''.'''s . . . • • . . TRACT MAP th " m2. o` 7F 5, , . • • :: J ,i ` ` 14 (--0-1 . 'ram co i N 4' a ^ 1 're' I Co I `-c LC I: 70 it, r•-• co .c �) 11urY♦v noaxra O Z r� cr moo*gr — —�` III Q z M ♦� �� x • -! V ti I. N i Ci� . irm M ♦, d—•.rr - .; Q Q 0 Y i\ss\\\\\:\ Q a" • CA M • Affirm :. ;" CO . ' I l=.. , is M 'i ' I c; VO i I; 1I. f; c CO N �Y .-�, i. M • • ♦ e. 11 (1). dr;I •� N• V.,. ----- / \ r .-0,La 4 iiik . Q • VII • a �.. - _<, 44 O • i; el in cv e CM CV • e! • M �7.� i IN• • l� i 0 ;. . . . , , . 01 CI ,; i N s. �' Adjancent Land Owners Le ZA96-131 # Resident Zoning # Resident Zoning 1 D. Rockenbaugh AG 23 E. Blevins AG 2 B. Knox AG 24 E. Bievins C2 3 B.Knox AG 25 G. Tillery C2 4 R. Birchfieid AG 26 DFW/White Chapel C2 Two 5 Y. Robertson AG 27 H. Knight C2 6 M. Williams SF-1A 28 J. Shivers AG 7 T. Mullaney SF-1A 29 C. Shivers AG 8 S. Specht SF-1A 30 H. Thrasher AG 9 J. Murphey SF-1A 31 W. Thrasher AG 10 D. Conrad AG 32 C. Leach AG 11 G. Niedson SF-1A 33 W. Davis AG (kir 12 Carroll ISD CS 34 H. Wayland AG 13 D. Burgess AG 35 S. Callicott SF-1A 14 Highland Group C3 36 W. Vann AG JV 15 DFW Hwy 114/ AG 37 W. Frank& F. Frank AG Highlands 16 DFW Hwy 114/ AG 38 K. Messina AG Highlands 17 DFW Hwy 114/ AG 39 R. Morganstean AG Highlands 18 C. Chang AG 40 V. Staley AG • 19 S. Kidwell • C2. - 41 • G. Ragnarsson . .- . . AG - 20 DFW Northwest AG : 42 A. Gercone - . - AG • Hwy 114 21 DFW Northwest AG 43 G. Roberts SF-20A Hwy 114 22 G. Tillery AG 44 H. Martin • AG 45 . W. Bpoker - - •.Ag:..... . 46. A. Cercone - •. .. AG : •. 47 W. Booker AG . ge -3 City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 96-131 Review No: Three Date of Review: 5/16/97 Project Name: Concept Plan"NRPUD" Zoning-Tract II Timarron Commercial.271.908 acres in the Absolom H. Chivers Survey Abstract No. 299 and the Larkin H.Chivers Survey Abstract No.300 APPLICANT: PLANNER/ENGINEER: Timarron Land Corporation ' Carter &Burgess. Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Freeway. Suite 1425 7950 Ehnbrook Drive. Suite 250 Irving. Texas 75062 Dallas, Texas 775247 Phone: (817)481-9509 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (817)481-0726 ATTN: Steve Yetts Fax: (214) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. * The applicant has met the requirements of previous reviews. * The applicant should be aware that an additional 4'of right-of-way,minimum,(based on the minimum R.O.W.width required to accommodate the street cross section)and/or easement may be required for the City Trail System connecting White Chapel Blvd. and Carroll Ave. Although R.O.W. is not dedicated with the Concept Plan,the applicant should also be aware that the City Thoroughfare Plan adopted 3/4/97 has expanded the minimum R.O.W. required along White Chapel Blvd. and Carroll Ave. from 84'to 94'. * A development plan specifying the intended use and development regulations for each proposed lot must be submitted prior to or concurrently with the preliminary plat for this site. Subsequent development plans and site plans will be reviewed based on the appropriate zoning district regulations as determined by the proposed use.A traffic impact analysis will be required with the submittal of any development plan or site plan for this site. The TIA must encompass the entire tract and not just the . portion for which the development plan is being submitted. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly . recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of a site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of the • plan reviewnud'that the,applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan r• equfir ements. • Applicabibty of tho Corridor OverlayZone set'forth •the Zoning 0 • No:480;:Section 43:5 as'amended. . ' • Vertical and horizbntal building articulation of proposed buildings per§43.9C 1 e, Ordinance 480, • as amended in areas subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone. • . • Masonry requirements per §43.9C 1 a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544.and§43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-R and 43-C . .�PagOs 44 -4.2:and 43-13, Ordinance 4:80,'asamcnded; and-Parking Lot;Impacls on:interior _• Con • . • 'landscaping in§43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14,Ordinance 480, as'aniended, • • • • Bufferyards according to Ordinance 480, §42 and §43 • Screening according to Ordinance 480, §39. • 7E — � 3 City of Southiake,Texas • Residential adjacency standards per §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480,as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480,as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No.480, as amended. • Driveway spacings and design criteria per the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a final plat must be submitted for approval and filed in the County Plat Records,a site plan,landscape plan,and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation Carter&Burgess,Inc. L:\WP-FILES\REV\96\96-13 I CP.3 • • • • • 1E- -,1.// TIMARRON COMMERCIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS TRACT II • DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS • PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES • PERMITTED USES • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS • LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE • CONCEPT PLAN EXHIBITS • 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION • BUFFER YARDS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN • CONCEPT PLAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION • ENGINEERING ANALYSIS • TRAFFIC STUDY • RUNOFF STATEMENT • • • �_� ` 1 tI ;•� a2i i.in::/7 May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 j `1C-3y PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES Timarron Land Corporation is requesting a Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning category for Tract II in its entirety. It is envisioned to be a"Mixed Use Business Park"development allowing a variety of land uses that will respond to the current and future market demands and ensure compatibility of land uses through creative planning. • The Non-Residential P.U.D. request will divide Tract II into three(3)separate parcels and will allow the following land use categories for each: PARCEL A • Residential* • CS -Community Service District(Sec. 8) • 01 -Office District(Sec. 18) • B 1 -Business Service Park District(Sec. 24) PARCEL B co, • Residential* • CS -Community Service District(Sec. 8) • 01 -Office District(Sec. 18) • B 1 -Business Service Park District(Sec. 24) PARCEL C • CS - Community Service District(Sec. 8) • 01 -Office District(Sec. 18) . • • • • • 02 =Office District(Sec. 19) • • Cl -Neighborhood Commercial District(Sec. 20) • • • C2 -Local Retail Commercial District(Sec. 21) • • • C3 - General Commercial District(Sec: 22) • B 1 -Business Service Park District(Sec. 24) • . HC-Hotel District(Sec. 28)... • • -** The'Non;tesidtsthial PUD•'shall*km aiiciltarS!resjdential:uses,limited to.the• ning • : .. • • classifications RE,SF.1 A, Sl'30 and SF20 up to 10 h of the land in the NRPUD(27.19 acres total). The permitted accessory uses;specific use permits,special exception uses and development regulations shall be as provided in the underlying RE, SFIA,SF30,and SF20 zoning districts set forth in Ordinance No.480,as amended. • • • May 12,1997 96204401.R02 �7DR-1 c, PERMITTED USES It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall permit those uses defined under the land use categories identified in this document(as established in the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480)and shall specifically include those uses described as: • • "Permitted Uses" • "Accessory Uses" • "Specific Use Permits" • "Special Exception Uses" . • Uses not listed under Zoning Ordinance No.480 that are similar in nature and/or have not been defined by current technology. LAND USES There are exceptions to the permitted uses. The uses"lined-out"on the.following pages shall be considered undesirable for this property and,therefore,prohibited. Those uses identified with a double asterisk(**) shall require a Specific Use Permit(SUP). Sexually oriented businesses will not be permitted on Tract II. RESIDENTIAL I. Permitted Uses • 1, RE- Single Family Residential Estate • 2. SF 1 A- Single Family Residential . _ ' . .3.- .SF-20 -Single Family Residential-_ •' •• . • • . . . 4. SP 30- Single-Family'Residential • • • May 12,1997' 96204401.R02 DR-2 • CS - COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses- BY SUP ONLY I. (DELETED) ** 2. Higher education institutions ** 3. Museums, libraries, fine arts centers,and similar cultural facilities ** 4. Golf courses, parks, playgrounds,community centers and country clubs (No commercially operated miniature golf courses or driving ranges) 5. (DELETED) ** 6. Public safety facilities ** 7. Religious institutions ** 8. City hall or other municipal office uses(excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills,and transfer stations) • • • • • • • • •• . .• • • • . • • . • • • • • . . . • .. _ . May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-3 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only -1 E-3e 0-1 OFFICE 'STRICT 1. Permitted Uses A. Office Uses 1. Accounting and tax preparation • 2. Adjustment and collection services 3. Advertising agencies 4. Architecture 5. Banking 6. Bill paying services 7. Business corporate headquarters(when used for office purposes only) 8. Business holding and investment services 9. Chamber of Commerce 10. Chiropractors 11. Computer services 12. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting 13. Contractors offices(provided no outside storage or display permitted) 14. Dentists 15. Duplication and mailing services 16. Employment services („,„.., 17. Engineering 18. Finance 19. Interior design 20. Land surveying 21. Law 22. Management consultants 23. Optometrists 24. Other offices of a business and/or professional nature 25. Physicians . 26. Podiatrists . 27.Psychiatrists • - • 28. Psychologists - - . : 29. Radio recording and television.broadcasting offices.and studios, • 30:Real estate and insurance - - • . . 31. Savings•and Loan • • .32. Seeuritiesland commodities brokers,dealers,underwriters and: xchange'officesn ' 33.Stenographic services 34.Title companies ' 35.Travel bureaus or services • 36. Utility offices May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-4 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. Public, semi-public and private parks ** 2. Recreation and open space ** 3. Libraries ** 4. City halls, fire and police stations, and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) ** 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character • Li • • • . • • . • . . . •: . • • . . - • • . ... . . • May 12,1997 • 96204401.R02 DR-5 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only r)1-/AO C0-2 OFFICE DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses A. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District B. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities c • • May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-6 • ** Use Permitted by SUP Only C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT II. Permitted Uses A. Commercial Uses I. Offices of a business and/or professional nature 2. Bakeries 3. Barber and beauty shops 4. Cleaners, laundries and/or Laundromats ** 5. Gasoline filling stations that operate in conjunction with small convenience stores 6. Grocery stores and/or meat markets 7. Newsstands and/or bookstores 8. Restaurants,tea rooms and/or"take-out"food establishments 9. Tailor,clothing or wearing apparel repair shops B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. City hall, fire and police stations and other municipal uses(excluding wastewater treatment facilities,landfills and transfer stations). (kw, • (.., . May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-7 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only '* -lit C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses 1. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District 2. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District ** 3. Cleaning,dying and pressing works; laundries and washaterias 4. Antique shops 5. Retail sail bakeries 6. Bicycle sales and bicycle repair shops 7. Blueprinting or photostating 8. Book or stationery stores 9. Business colleges or private schools for vocational training of office related careers 10. Christmas tree sales 11. Cigar or tobacco stores ** 12. Cleaning,dying and pressing works; laundry and Laundromats 13. Confectionery stores 14. Custom dress making or millinery shops 15. Dancing schools 16. Day nurseries 17. Delicatessen shops without size limitations 18. Dog and cat hospitals(excluding large animal clinics) 19. Drug stores 20. Dry goods and notion stores provided that the floor area of such facility not exceed eight thousand(8,000) square feet ** 21. Duplicating service,printing,lithographing, mimeographing,multi-graphing and offset printing ** 22. Filling stations or service stations,operating with/without a convenience store 23. Financial institutions 24. Florist or gift shops • ** 25. Frozen food lockers 26. Grocery stores and meat markets 27. Health.service facilities 28. Jewelry stores 29.-Leather.and leather good shops 30. Optical goods . • 31. Photographs,portrait or cainera shop and photofinishing . • •_ • .'32.E Radi• o.andtt•elevien sales•and servicing , • •3 . Restaurarits;'teaams,cafeeeria§,fast food•a3nd".take-out food restaurants • 34. Shop repair services 35. Sporting goods, including gun sales and repair 36. Tailor ** 37. Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales • 38: Variety stores. .• • •, • • May 12,.1997 96204401.R02 DR-8 Use Permitted by SUP Only C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses 1. Any use permitted in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District ** 2. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas 3. Coin and stamp shops ** 4. Commercial amusement centers and bowling alleys 5. Commercial art galleries ** 6. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses 7. Department stores 8. Dry goods and notion stores 9. Electrical and gas appliances and supply sales, electrical and gas repair and installation services(excluding propane tank sales) 10. Hardware,paint, and wallpaper stores 11. Hat shops 12. Health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums 13. Hobby shops 14. Household and office furniture,furnishings and appliances 15. Lodges,sororities and/or fraternities _ 16. (DELETED) 17. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers(excluding cemeteries,crematories and mausoleums) 18. Music or record shops 19. Nursery buildings 20. Pet shops 21. Piano stores, musical instruments and supplies 22. Plumbing and heating appliances,repair and installation services(excluding propane tank sales) 23. Printing, lithographing or duplicating jobs . • 24. Retail stores,business or shops for custom work. • • 25. Skating rinks, ice and roller - ** 26. Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of special use permit(excluding sexually oriented businesses) 27::Toy stores . . . **. 28: Upholstery•shops furniture- .. . : . ... . . _ • • 29.Variety stores •. . . . . • • May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-9 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 0-1 BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT* I. Permitted Uses A. Office and Commercial Uses 1. Any use permitted in 0-1 District 2. Administrative, executive or editorial offices for industrial organizations ** 3. Apparel and millinery manufacturing and assembly 4. Banks 5. Barber and beauty shops 6. Book and stationery stores ** 7. Computer manufacture and research 7a. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities operated principally for the benefit and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated office complex 8. (DELETED) ** 9. Electronic manufacture 10. Funeral homes(excluding cemeteries,crematories,and mausoleums) ** 11. Lithograph,engraving,printing and publishing ** 12. Manufacture of medical and dental equipment ** 13. Manufacture of musical instruments 14. Medical clinics ci ** 15.Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and g landscaP in companies P ** 16. Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing 17. Private/public schools 18. Professional/business schools 19. Retail activity of a service nature designed to provide direct service support to the businesses and employees who occupy the remainder of the office complex 20. Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure • ** 21. Scientific and professional instrument manufacturing 22. Security guard quarters (excluding living quarters) ** 23. Small parts manufacturing and assembly - . - 24. Studios for.training in fine arts . • . . . B. Community Facility Uses • .. ''* .1•. Cky Mall,.policy'and fire.statio ns ani1 gtivar miin�icipal uses(extludiuig:wastewater: . .- • •• treatment facilities, landfills:andltransfer stations • • . • .. . . •• * Any manufacturing use within the B 1 zoning district shall require a SUP. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . ., , -. .- . . • • • . .• ••• • • . . , .. • . • " . • . . . • ci .. .. • May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-10 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses ** 1. Hotels and motels ** 2. Parks and playgrounds which are publicly owned ** 3. Golf courses which are privately owned ** 4. City hall,police and fire stations and other municipal uses(excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills,and transfer stations) • • • • ... • . . . . . . . • • • . . • . . • • . . • .• . . . . • • . . . . . •• . . . : . • •• • May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-11 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall adhere to the development standards currently established in Zoning Ordinance No. 480 as amended and furthermore shall comply to all new ordinances as they are adopted for each land use category with the following exceptions: BUILDING SETBACKS Setbacks for Tract II land uses shall be maintained in accordance with Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the corridor overlay standards. When located adjacent to or across.the street from residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan,the setbacks shall be the greater of the 4:1 slope or the minimum setbacks shown in the following table. Setbacks shall be measured from the Timarron property line where it is adjacent to residential areas. Setback Adjacent to Residential RES 35' CS 100'Min. Ol 100' Min. 02 100' Min. Cl 100' Min. C2 100' Min. C3 100' Min. • • • B 1 100' Min.* • HC 100' Min. . * . Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIB the•City Council reserves•the option to ..' ; • • require a 300'.building setback from Carroll Avenue at the Site•Plan:stage of the•approval .• •. process: = • • May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-12 BUILDING HEIGHTS Maximum building heights for Tract II land uses shall be in accordance with the following table: Maximum Building Height • RES 35' 2.5 Stories CS 35' 2.5 Stories 01 45' 2.5 Stories 02 90' 6 Stories Cl 45' 2.5 Stories C2 45' 2.5 Stories C3 45' 3 Stories B I 45' 2.5 Stories HC 90' 6 Stories • May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-13 i'7-00 • (1irr, BUFFER YARDS Perimeter buffer yards for Tract II shall comply with the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and shall have minimum widths in accordance with the following table: Adjacent to Carroll Avenue and Primrose Adjacent to Lane Residential* Other RES 50' 25' 25' CS 50' 35' 25' 01 50' 35' 25' 02 N/A 35' 25' Cl N/A 35' 25' • C2 N/A 35' 25' C3 N/A 35' 25' B 1 50' 35' 25' HC N/A 35' 25' *Residential adjacency shall be defined as residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan adjacent to or across the street from Tract II. If a specific B 1.user is identified for Parcel II B, the Planning and Zoning Commission reserves the option to require a pedestrian barrier along Carroll Avenue at the Site Plan stage of the approval process. • Refer to the Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan exhibit for the general location of each buffer yard type. • • • May 12, 1997 ' 96204401.R02 DR-14 (..., 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION ADJACENT TO CARROLL AVE. AND PRIMROSE LANE • 50' BUFFER YARD JP l , z i erW_l 13. (0,, ..4r ii.. .„.4,,PP--,•__,, - tZ slog ifkill la t PARKING ti . ��. MEANDERING IIII ��V�"' � BERM • •___._� 1 •(AVG.5'HT.) • • • MAY 12, 1997 96204401.I1 f E- go (60, LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544. For 02 and HC uses,additional landscaping will be provided in the amount of 1%of the lot area for every story from two (2)to four(4) plus 2%for every story from five(5)to six (6). OPEN SPACE The open space for each tract will include the buffer yards around the perimeter of the project as required by the Southlake Corridor Study and the additional buffer yard adjacent to residential uses. The open space also includes lakes and floodplain areas. A HEC-2 engineering study performed specifically for this tract of land will determine the location of the improved floodplain and floodway areas and the open space will be located according to the results of that study. The site specific HEC-2 engineering study will be performed at the development plan stage of the approval process.•There will be no impervious coverage permitted within the improved flood plain area with the exception of-pedestrian trails. Timarron Land recognizes the value of the existing vegetation and will incorporate master design guidelines that respond to tree preservation;at the development plan stage of the zoning process. A tree survey will be prepared for the site plan submittal. The developer will comply with the tree preservation requirements of the City of Southlake,as those requirements are developed. The attached Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan illustrates the general location of the proposed buffer yards and open space for Tract II. • • • • • May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-15 \ / a , a 1 : 1 I g 0 0 8 0 ii ii 4; iii i I t 1 0 i.„11 - le Pg 1 i 1 i 1°3 I I III ii I E-1:46 '•-ti!11 .1 "4° Ci leitO" . / \ :I 1 04 :6! 4 1 a 1 I I) a I El i 1 i II. I 14 a e . 311NHAV TIO1INV3 0 '!---" .'"-IM 1 . . • ,,...•,.,..:-.4:-„-;;;t:'`..., •-,. .F.;.--.,--7,- ...... ..,:..----,._aff..-.....:-....,,...,...i. i. — ‘.iz...,., • .. I .,i • '4.•.* S ad r,t,..:',•..kT4)-,i‘ (t-1;).--.,.i,%,,:..; .-.-. ... %...-:„.'7,.,,t. ...', s.. • ,•....." I ',...... .1"..,,•. .:"......•:.- -• .,!.-..:. 7.' -:: ,Zi. Mit r..... ..:..‘'.:.'.:.,:!. ,'•. ::%4 4 tr,, .....,..,v 0 ,-.1.• / 34)111-Wk--F;T.4,;TI rai,‘ '11 v t --:- • 1,1,p,:.....„4.4.:,,,-:,.,,,...ss,..x.:-...: . kp., ,. 1 y-N.• . ., •i '•"'!''q..-- ..---•' rib:, ‘ .,..-, 1... it i" ,..... 4.4tm.„ .1.; ,,..•:.,..-/....,-:...-..!-,-,.-, :,:,c, . t,,:, ,,,,.,.( ... ,...,,,-.4 xi.:fF.r.i.i.,.:I....“!,'...,..:.;::::.:...-....:.f::.:...::.',-.:...:,4,-:..:.,::;..:.::.*::...:-„.':./:"...1!:•.:2,..:....--•,.P::i.,.-..2n:.::..%.'',..,;•'.,.,,..'....t'r';] :.N, ,,::.t,.":'4.1*-1::-::',;•',.: t,-.-.-..7,,-,--,.7••-•--•:..1_i--\-----,--(--,.-...:.'.:-'%,:::-:V:.\‘',>‘.J,,•:--..•,\,\\‘ i 4)....... ,. .. _ i i, \:'..•.,.. ..'...;:,..,,.,:--;..•11,7, . T., - ; _..---- ,-....-....s.--_, ,,, .% ., ,..ri, _ • I...., ...-:,:,..i \•: ....31:00','''.1 ili Ike'\ .-.." .. A .:i j IL 4.., .'-' ' :-:: ',4..*'.:-..-- .' ': kr:• ' '1' -, 1 q 1,-.;•,,--,,.. ......./__,-..:-..1 :..,:, 4.1 1 ,, 1 It). ; ' ;':••••••c' r 7 ,. .....:,;-:r •, ‘-.. - .4;10- '14:',4,-,-', ' -•:..... ....7. .,., :.,'k , 1 . ., .' .fi 1,: 1...st .- .....-. •I,-. 4-:•-Q„:•„: d • .----...---.„,0\1 i.-:kfi,\ k, .-`..-:•-•,•!-!-• ' -..-- '.,-;:•;,..* , •., ..cr)17i:t -..,—......" ...17,..---..\._,4 1,,,. •:;\ \ .4:, tor4 y.,\t;?. : .....:/;2.-..;;...-:.:1'4 I,,. 'Cl', ‘ ' fi i . -\ . ,,•:.i....'ii.;.(v:„...?!..L 4;:-.:,.:^ :::„., - tt. 5L4x,-.;1 ,„1,:..:„. ,... .,,....--;. ji!.1; .., ,‘., 1 ,; t:Olf ;,:. •.',; •Iii„1 .7)''':',.:I.--.. _' -7.41,..)((c:-.,%.,:s.-.4--:.,-;.";:2`..1-V.1 : Si '.,'1, ;\ ',. i., "" 1/ (a ......:•,4,..,. ....,:,./. ,...,:::: .s.Ntf.11.1,.s.1.‘ „,::: ...,../..........ki....< II... ,..\ .. \ • (00 I.:... -. '''''.. .. '.., • . .....„'''....'÷.., ......i.' Z:.,‘,.I.:\••:...ii.if , i :._.,,K.,,;,, '%.,_.\..:1•i,11... . : '`. .1 i . ' . . ,... '.:.0,:47 1 IA...1.'..,.A i , 4.ilk..,- I,-, I),L':..:7.•;,..... ' t • , . . ' .: .i... . 1 • „ , .\ v , .. /....4.,,,,,,a..w..z...,...$?. $ 1 Alit 0.,1:ro c \ 4,s•...",-...-,./:Tho,,-;.s..,..,--. , ..., 1 .- ' .41 ,...;::•:7;.;(,:;;.•,:. :'.-4,v)i5 \\‘,)ii.OA ki\sl. \ ' filpi, ''"'"'i",t;'"A,f.;r...-•• 'I\ \ • ,ii, U 1 ''.1/1107,4i4OVA i•- ,,,,,,,,,..,,,„ : „:. .., . ,,, „.....,„ie._ ., .4,...•,- ••• -,, . - . .,., . N i f,: • ..-, ) ....:'?„., 4 iviT • .. • '-• 4, in ), l co, :,,...,:,.:„v:;., c.,•\.,k:....,..ot..li ,t„,:?..,, i‘., ,,,,,E,\,.,. .2.:.......... — ,t.:,..,....-„ ., ..,?. - . ____ ,.,. : .,..„,, ,,,.„......,.......p :. .„v4( .1, 1 , ...• 11 1 ._...4.,,, . !,-...:: :.•,...*.. •,..;::•,.v..:::. - , I;iv: i if r;I ------ ,....-% ''. '......:'NE.,::::,: .•,7......•-..„-- i. -III i I) ----, ..tiis.:_i--11, 11: , .' r) --. l :-'s. ;:i....;.-„..; : ,-;;....-- -., /,../../.....;___,5--- -2,...,..- -..... - .il a , ), ,...... r.1..t1•:1'.* ',,!- -------T,g.C/` =1 oc4--- ---- ." """•'1..- : '' -. r7--- :;--.,-....-4,i-- ---. • ...- ..., ' • ''' , • .. . . _ --,--,.-..,-:?•=7,-77.------7.13,-'-') ''‘ . -...: ) -SN:.----7------------;‘,.y,--- ', 2.----'ri i ------,,i<,%.7/1;-,-,...'---=:',.-b4.--_,-':'::------... %.,s, -- . : :.; ..--`-/ , ) ----....--- ..., ; i 4 .. .„ ..., J. ,,.. ,, :._......_.:____.....„ ..„..„.....,.,,,,..„..,,.....„—.2.„,.......„,.,--.- .i.,.....,- ......, „....„........ .....:,..„..--..... .„ 4,-„,.......... ..:s..... ..„..„.,,... , , , .._ :,,, . ... . ... — ,", „,--..--,,.., ...- , ,, 0 • :,---- --„, ; ,..-z..--,,.... , ,....., ,., - , ,....____-...—.._. \ 6,0. ,,, . •• 41', ( r•i i 'tr.(4 -......,,,,-`,,,. -- 114.4. ''', .• .....::::- ,. \•••...),.\--•. .,,,„..•„.) 14,,, , , ,.. ,,r.r. .,,-' ' \ . ‘)i ON ) ' );". 1- .. .,i*r...", :.;.'.......: .. ,..„-..—,t ,..„,.,:,,,:„..„ . ,4 zsly/ 71 1/4..':::,.705:- P4 t- k .. \‘,. ..•••,- ....,-A,1..`..... ••var",,,,*‘.,. ---: ...-P-.':;:-------0.0.1'11 i.i..! 4 )1 ;1 1, -7,1( , . , , ,/,• :,,,,4-•‘, it:lit k\(,f ',„. .---'' XI' ,::',4•'--- :,• - • 1 ,- , \ .-c.' ..,\-,, -3.%.•s•-••. .-- `.-4, ., ' ... i•r‘\;,-#-:1 s,1k?..,.0. ..1 1 \ -- , • •7•.'•• "i5.-- - `z. • ' . ' ,610., ,..,,,t, , -kr-,N.'4-.• 1,, , • ..--, Jar..,.v.. r It.-.0,,. v. \\ k... .t• ', , .. •)1_._:. - ."17••••,* ,,,... . -, f.i..:.\i'A.1• S.y :;'!'''..&'':1''. • 1.\\ 1 ' --.g..)':1 -\\ 1\••• ..'". ,-;...i ',..-' ,\.‘\' -..1`-' . '-..-i • : .. P4 . ...• .• . -:,,,„.-..,,,,. , ). .-‘• • . . ..• • . ,,,•• •4;-•:::,,:,...„--,-- . . . . .. ... .. 1,,....„ ,.. --........ ...•••_----, . , ,-,... 4... , ,..„ ......„ ..... , ,,: \. , A I:,,V.':4k..4. ----,,___-• ,,,,f/... ,f ! .;!•-•.s....---_-_.-, .,-7. ..:•:, , .:" ---.;:,:4-.-- . . .., „ .., . -:.::,.. -.„,, --• . ,.- ;,,, ./ „..--.. - - -,.../ • s,-- - , „-•,/,..,? • '-., --- 3 . L4 i.s .-------N .--.-:--..i... Lf„-??,,..-.:--..-7":e.,4-' ---,--.,.. \‘-.•A-, -' -------fr ire. ,,.,,,. , A -/--4:4,_ it '• ,,N., _.., -y7=-5 *.........--------, \ ... ..--.„---. . . ... • ., .,.-•* .-----.._.....• _, e *.-:. ,4 .7 ,- .--....----,--..z-z. , -,, ' -• t .----,.,...-- . .... '-' 74+ 'A',`• \\ vvr-I: ,a ";;--: ---.--7.4.....--,-... . ----•--4-1;-,--it.eAttit, i ir r .1 f - ..• r,. \ .....,--.., ... ,,'- • ; • 1.• . • . :., _ ,.., ...1! , i. ,..., .... .. _.. ,, p...:__ 7.,,• ,,, , • • ••-• ,.., : .. • ". , :, - .-.., . •• , ,,.. :. -•• • . . . „" • / ,111,- -"".•-.na, ,...„,, offg ly ,r,c . . .. .. .,...., . . , . ., ..-,, , -.:.,.... . , •-•. ..:, -----;;-.......'-- ---,/..... -....-- -tilif,,,,,,,' " ,-;:dri,fi, .-.f. i,r.4.-./g00.-"--wi', v•74,,;" /3-q4,14,4,44,.. -: • ..,_, -.:.• - •• . .., • :, ,. .. . ,,e.,...._ , ,,,, / ithiel .,„,, of:,; ._ . .4.4,7. il,14:4 f../4"- `,..._. • .:.".--,i-r .:• . i't 7„/.17,•IV _-_ -- . . . . I ......i . . v. . . .,., .., -; • , • • 11 i) F.';:r :i-- -4-1,z : :. r''' Aril ' -,'L-i -"--t-'. .1-!,--4 .:,;-.,f,„-,, ,,.....-_-:-....,, .. ..._..,..c+7....:3 r, ,:ra.,„ ,,;r • .. di;4.,,t,,,-• I..r '*:../..,Vi I ON ',f::...,;,,.At.C... •, --....-....."7 -1 ...,......,7.1.2 ) • pr.-• ...--,--dit F ,,„, 4,- - k. E,.."' ,f , (' ..t:.." ,,.. ..,ey,„ i'..-., tir . •• ' '''1. • ) 0 sag Ho , ...., . .44, , ,---- ' -',5,' LA t— ry `k-1 ,, . ,.. -,,,,, ,„ .- . ' ..,..:. - ...4 ...... ,..•__________—_,,--, ---- - •-• ig§ • .........r.. .e......a.......--2a...,rfIlike-wor.....-7,1";_tili!el - .......%.../ . - , ' " - -r.X,,--'• N4S1 :TO • i'" li i c'' ,-..-sf '..C_...f..Thl i'.. t V\'NZ-710 , ,, i T-Ct' CONCEPT PLAN This submittal responds to the concept plan requirements defined in Sections 30 and 41 (as amended by Ordinance 480-C) for a Non-Residential Planned Unit Development. The size and location of this tract offers a variety of potential development scenarios to attract quality users. Flexible tract sizes, facility locations, access and zoning are critical to attracting • quality users to this site. This concept plan provides the flexibility which the current market is seeking. TRACT II The following table demonstrates land use categories permitted for each parcel within Tract II. The attached exhibit"Concept Plan" further illustrates the general location of each parcel. PARCEL` Area LAND USE CATEGORIES A 53.40 ±AC Residential, CS,01, B 1 B 130.97 ±AC Residential,CS,01, B1 cs, C 87.53 ±AC CS, 01, 02, Cl, C2,C3, Bl, HC SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS i' • Ancillary residential uses RE, SF 1 A, SF30 and SF20 are not to exceed 27.19 acres for the entire Tract II Non-Residential P.U.D. and shall not exceed a density of 1.0 du/ac. • Access tb Primrose Lane will not be permitted. • • Access to Carroll Avenue will be restricted to one full access location for residential uses or • one emergency "crash-gate"access for CS, 01 and B 1 uses. • • Commercial uses(C1,C2, and C3) combined shall not exceed 50%of the gross Parcel area for Parcel IIC. • • • , Once a specific user.is identified:for Parcel B,.the City Council reserrves.the option to•require 'a 300'building setback from Carroll Avenue at the Site Plan stage of the approval process. • If a specific B 1 user is identified for Parcel B,the City.Council reserves the option to require a pedestrian barrier along Carroll Avenue at the Site Plan stage:of the approval process. • • • . •� �. •:There wilt be no impenriouseovera •;tt•.•. • ,, ... � • - . Coverage petriti ed in the flood plain With"the'exception of • . .. • May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-16 n F,53 L./ pedestrian trails. • The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544. For 02 and HC uses,additional landscaping area will be provided in the amount of 1%of the lot area for every story from two (2) to four(4) plus 2% for every story from five(5) to six (6). QUALITY AND CONTINUITY OF DEVELOPMENT It is Timarron Land's intent to have in place master design guidelines to create continuity and quality at the development plan stage for Tracts II. The design guidelines will be available for review at the time of development plan submittal. (..„, • • • . . . . • • • .• . • . . . . . . . • . . . . . .. . • .. . . • . •• . • . :. . . • . . . . . . . . . • . . • . .. .. . . . . . • . • • . . •• . .. . . . • . . . . • • . . : ., . ...... „... .. . , ..... ., . . ...... : .. . .: .. ...... • • . . .• ......... -. . r. . ..- .- ! ,. .;...-.,;: ,.......„.... :-........,.,.. ..:. .. . ; :--, . .. .. .:• . ,: . -. . ,::. . ........, „.: • ,...,.... . .. .. . ,.• .. ..... ... . .. . . •• • • . . . . • .. ... . . •• . • . • . . . . .. . . .•. .• . . .. . • ... .. . . . ' • •• • • • . . May 1 2, 1997 96204401.R02 • DR-17 1._741 t vs Li \ / 41 1: 1 ii! I 11; 4 4,1 dr?,1 4 1 1 eau 11 Ili ,x 1 1 r aI Ha> " ils s siliViiii $ P1 : II d fil t2f / \ a 1111 ;ginindikil lil gel - 1 1 1 1 11111111111 h11.42 tI E-4Hrt _ AU in"' 1 ARIA al ills 0 Log ,, \ \, :II 1 N\a $ i 1: 1 14, . ‘ 4 W. f• 111 1.1 1G • 1 °O' ' ---� !r ct ' O emu 11 4- li ' a.ii.sh i:a67::. , . , ,, ..,1 ss .. . MIS kti . mg. , 123 a , fi_ �« ., Iris .0 . a 0 I " . • .• • ip k • ° , ro krIll ,, 2 aria C 14 at .s' • 1 1•;.thie0"''•'el U . * ae 1 i r 1 k 1.1 iiii z Pi o It" 1 p � Oda; _AI � O • �• •� • I',11 •'%,1.5‘ I MI . • e .LZ.01.00AM%SI en `•.. ��2Q_ jl. �! 2.e �g�g �I �• r ° o'�ssx.' . IK 1QI f' = Z 9a f ($j'� kx@ '•;/. Pia 4z.. r. ,,,/, o gg pop ' ''i 41.,i,, • "d'�$ �x _ j:i e P. gil -.Fj.1 i 1 1 InC/itfir 1 digj ts - •JA A/ • ;0, Ps 0 • 12 .1 il 111 le ./e a gill is rff 47 • . li.4, , :.5,....6 . i n ni I. A , I/ Rd Pei • Ypl �� Jj p: 9 i A o �L z J ? 3 3i.. IN- 1 i s f . • `. IPA O n ,•:r p . 12. igg rip-5c • ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Engineering analysis for this project will be performed by registered engineers, licensed in the State of Texas, and meet the requirements of existing ordinances and/or governing authorities. The intent and understanding regarding various infrastructure issues is as described below: STORM DRAINAGE Drainage generally flows away from a ridgeline which bisects the property in a northeast- southwest trend. The proposed drainage plan will include the necessary systems required to route are discharge to existing natural drainage ways. WATER DISTRIBUTION An adequate water distribution system is proposed on all sides bordering the site. Distribution main-lines not less than 12" are planned for Carroll Avenue, White Chapel Boulevard and S.H. 114. A system of 12" watennains is planned to provide adequate pressure on a volume required of the potential users, without significant impact to the overall surrounding community. SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM • The southerly two-thirds of the property flows to the southeast corner and can be served by the existing lift station on Carroll Avenue. Eventually,the lift station will be removed and a gravity line built to the northeast and connect to the gravity line which flows to the Hunter's Ridge lift station. Currently, the Hunters Ridge lift station pumps to the Carroll Middle School lift station just • north of East Dove Street. From that point, sewage is pumped*south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. • The northerly one-third of the Tract II will gravity flow to the proposed Quail Creek lift station. This lift station is planned for summer 1997. • As a temporary measure until a force Main is constructed in Dove Street west to Kirkwood;the Quail•Creek's lift station would force main back to the Carroll Middle School lift station and . • • • south to the Carroll Avenue lift station.:A more desirable scenario-would be to•direct flow from • the Quail Creek station westerly along East Dove Street. This force main would terminate at a gravity line at future Kirkwood Boulevard and Dove Street. • • May 12,1997 96204401.R02 B_1 I r • co, TRAFFIC STUDY The concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic impacts. The appropriate stage in the zoning process to provide a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis is at the time of submittal of a development plan when a specific land use is identified. This traffic study provides assurances regarding the intent for traffic flow and the requirement for a full blown Traffic Impact Analysis for each subsequent development plan submittal. LAND USES The land uses proposed with this zoning change are substantially in accordance with the land uses used during the development of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. They are also similar in trip generation to the NCTCOG model inputs used in the development of the Thoroughfare Plan. STATE HIGHWAY 114 IMPROV MENTS TxDOT is making progress on the acquisition of right-of-ways and other planning for the dr construction of interchanges along the highway. The developer will continue to monitor this progress and will incorporate all TxDOT updates into the future traffic analysis. PERIMETER STREETS State Highway 114 and White Chapel will be the primary access routes into Tract II. Internal circulation roads will orient traffic for easy access to State Highway 114. Access to Carroll Avenue will be limited to residential uses or emergency crash-gate access only. THOROUGHFARE PLAN IMPACTS This proposal complies with the existing Master Thoroughfare Plan for the City. A representative monitored the deliberations of the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the update of this Master Plan. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS . • A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis(TIA)will be provided at the development plan stage of process. At that stage of development,the proposed users will be known and an accurate - analysis of all traffic impacts can be performed. • - co, . . • • May 12,1997 ' 9620440I.R02 B-2 (..., RUNOFF STATEMENT Timarron Commercial will detain 100%of the increase in runoff generated by future development of these tracts. All developments will abide by the existing drainage ordinances in the City of Southlake and will work with the Public Works Department to address concerns regarding the effect of this project on drainage. C • - - • Cl .. . . • , . . • . •. . . • • .. ... .• • • • May12,1997 96204401.R02 • • B-3 sr)C—✓8 cre' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-221 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING • CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 271.908 ACRES SITUATED IN THE ABSOLOM H. CHIVERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 299, TRACTS 3 AND 4A1, AND IN THE LARKIN H. CHIVERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 300, TRACTS 1, 2, AND 3A1, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "NR-PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A MIXED USE BUSINESS PARK TO INCLUDE LIMITED USES IN THE THE FOLLOWING DISTRICTS: "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, "0-2" OFFICE DISTRICT, "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL (iire DISTRICT, "B-1" BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT, "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT AND ANCILLARY RESIDENTIAL USES (NOT EXCEEDING 27.19 ACRES) FROM THE "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, "SF-30" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND "SF-20" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; • • DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND; • • GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND ' AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ' .ORDINANCES;. PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING.FOR A.PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR • PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,.the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter •. ,. adopted'by.the electorate prtrstrant to Mole.XI;Seetion=S`.of the Texas'Constitution anc Chaptex • •§•o€the Texas Lt calbovernment•Code; alid, • • • WHEREAS,:pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-221.PUD Page 1 authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of (1110, public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, • • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is'a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their • original investment was made; and, • - • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas;does find that•the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and,facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage,schools,parks and other public requirements; and, • WHEREAS,the City Council:ofthe City of,Soiithlake;Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been • a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-221.PUD Page 2 of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 271.908 acre tract of land situated in the Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 299, Tracts 3 and 4A1, and in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, Tracts 1, 2, and 3A1, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District for a Mixed Use Business Park to include limited uses in the following districts: "CS" Community Service District, "0-1" Office District, "0-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, "HC" Hotel District and ancillary residential uses (not exceeding 27.19 acres) from the "RE" Residential Estate District, "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District, "SF-30" Single Family Residential District,and "SF-20" Single Family Residential District, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. • Section 3. . That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above . • described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and - • all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. . • . Section 4. That• the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, • -„water, sewerage;drainage and surface water,parks and.other commercial;needs and development - _ • '•.• • of the•co nity.: They have:been made-after a.full.and complete'hearing with reasonable" : ' • consideration among other things-of the character of the distriet and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480.221.PUD J�� Page 3 n appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys,omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted (esve, until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect frdmand after its passage and • publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. • . (46.„ • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-221.PUD Page 4 fir— a Z thio, PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. C MAYOR ATTEST: • .CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: . . APPROVED AS TO`FOR AND,LEGALITY'. • . - • • CITY ATTORNEY • . • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-221.PUD Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" L BEGI NU,IG AT A PO `T FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 100.809 ACRE TR.A.CT IN THE APPROXIMATE LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO.3021(NORTH CARROLL ROAD); THENCE S 00^06T2" ALONG ISTANCE 07 1705.25 FEET TO A POINT FORS THE SOUI:AID 1 ST CORNER OFMATE FS SAD)A ll100.809 ACRE TRACT; THENCE N 89^38'07" W,ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 100.809 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 17330 FEET TO A POINT FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 38.6971 ACRE TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE MOST EASTERLY LINE OF SAID 38.6971 ACRE TRACT,THE FOLLOWING THREE CALLS: S 00^08'50" E,A DISTANCE OF 247.67 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 89'57'40" E,A DISTANCE OF 144.75 I i i' TO A POINT.FOR ,CORNER; S 01^50'02" E,A DISTANCE OF 266.64 FEET TO A POINT FOR TEE MOST EASTERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 38.6971 ACRE TRACT; THENCE N 88^S9'32" W,ALONG A SOUTH OF SAID 38.6971 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 1042.06 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 00^44'01" E,ALONG AN EAST LINE OF SAID 38.6971.ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 299.84 ±-±j r TO A POINT FOR THE MOST SOUTHERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER Opf"AID 38.6971 ACRE TRACT; ALONG THE MOST SOUTHERLY•LINE OF SAID 38.6971 ACRE TRACT THE FOLLOWING TWO CAU S: • N 88^39'39" W,A DISTANCE OF 85536 ]']i i' TO A POINT FOR CORNER; N 88^ L;L'40'49" W,A DISTANCE OF 66832 I' r TO A POINT FOR THE SOUTHWEST ,CORNER OF SAID 38.6971 ACRE TRACT; • , THENCE N 00^20'55" W,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID 38.6971 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 42L73 FEET TO A POINT FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 55.954 ACRE TRACT; • • • • • • • L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-221.PUD Page 6 L. _ TAN F? ALONG THEt SOUTH LINE OF SAID 55-954 ACRE TRACT,THE FOLLOWING THREE CALLS: I ' N 89^25'02" W,A DISTANCE OF 476.69 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; A DISTANCE OF 298.56.FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; N 89^09'09" j,A DISTANCE OF 55256 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO.114 (220'R.O.W.); E THENCE N 62^10'47" W,ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 603.83 TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE N 00^11'57" W,ALONG THE WEST LINE.OF SAID 55.954 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 1053.89 FEET TO A POINT FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 55.954 ACRE TRACT; THENCE S 89"56'08" E,ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 55.954 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 575.22 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN THE -SOUTH LINE OF SAID 76.448 ACRE TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 76.448 ACRE TRACT THE FOLLOWING TWO CALLS: LN 00^02'04" E,A DISTANCE OF 1195 FELL' TO A POINT FOR CORNER; N 89"56'09" W,A DISTANCE OF 1310.00 HIT TO A POINT FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 76.448 ACRE TRACT,IN THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO.3016 (PLEASANT RUN - WHITE CHAPEL ROAD); I THENCE N 00^16'S2" E,ALONG THE MOST WESTERLY LINE OF SAID 76448 ACRE TRACT AND SAID' APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF 89128 I.BET TO A POINT FOR THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 76.448 ACRE TRACT; THENCE S 89^56'18" E,ALONG A NORTH LINE OF SAID 76.448 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 46415 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE N 00^26'32" E„ALONG A WEST LINE OF SAID 76.448 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 469.80 FEET. TO A POINT FOR THE MOST NORTHERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 76-448 ACRE TRACT; THENCE S 89^39'56" E,ALONG THE MOST NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID 76-448 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 2142.63 FEET TO A POINT FOR THE NORTHEAST'CORNER OF SAID 76.448 ACRE TRACT; • • THENCE S 00^18'27".•W,AIONG. Tim . . . C .: . `. DISTANCE •OF 653.68 TO A POINT FOR TfIEFNORR CORNER OF.SAID 100.809 - "ACRE TRACT; - THEN E S 89"38'16" E,ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 100.809 ACRE TRACT,A DISTANCE OF 256919 FEET THE POINT OF BEGINNING,AND. CONTAINING 27L908 ACRES OF LAND,MORE OR LESS. • •L• . . . L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-221.PUD Page 7 fl1 U� EXHIBIT 11B" ►—, 1 1\ i e$ I!! !p ;`I, 0 E/ ' g 1; 0 illi lel ig 1 pRO iR (..„,. iiiii *Eii • z li.! O / \ o 1"e I eIN N .11, o ' ' i i 1 1 ili;111111114111 ggliiiii% (ji ''''' igh _ U 01 I i 113P;gP"3111Nui&Piggy 0 ;ge 0x R� �!r O1 \ , © L NFil ga a4 Y. Y. ig 1 R� (sro...n ., ... - `• _&. t¢vranv .ig. _.„:„..:,_ ___ _IMMO 1i14, 11it11,1 :`:..'6—..E-.: 00 � � ®ar�ata. �s 'tAl . 8 oo. 0 17 1..S �� r� mi51 o . 1P1 �_ O .t ) F3 "1 :o° a Y II . p , '-4: "_!4 ddd AAg4 O7 k ss.. , 1 d ... igi: 11 41 lii.1 It o °Eke • .0 II Ix 0 I 07 8P. . . 4 O C O� R . 1 ilk-;-:. ._ R zQb:'Wr\ y--. y � a a 10 • F.t . 1 . C § ill • iii,: 0. 1 Ili o . spa .0 .i[ „, .- .144 .1 8 _ : & ...c. . >. . Cee o Ht • •°.. • 1 - : , a _Y1.—; 1 111E .O YS! f44101115111111 % , 022-,e1MIP4 / _t 5 z 41‘. ,01gailif'II 1.7. 2It ird.it ' / •. ozk 4 - ci : . ,,.://4.-7,7.-i" '''-' 70 O i t/ ( N n z �- i,i f' O ZyC Apt ,:o •t igla I'Co...../;44.. ' 4, ‘-' =5 "'" 167457/./ Ito ms 0 • 1-V7 .7 i.1151/ : t• t g j z ti.y .• 4,• ,.^,i5 " d 1 1 1 se 4,1./ ,,,7 s• Y. I E( J _ �. �// N )(! Pdi • dill I I Mili111211141-1,13.14:p•r,, Fir 3'�lN ��oM.- �_f / �: CO i- �,, f, o i • lip_ - t(. _ i:ViiirAfili '. -.--r--47:.......iii fl. _ _ pity /L., , , . „... . • .. :: ,. ,..,/, ici. • 8 (...., L:\CTYDOCS10RD\C §2r Page 8 ASfiS148O 221.PUD TIMARRON COMMIVIERCIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS TRACT II DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS • PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES • PERMI 1-1ED USES • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS • LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE • CONCEPT PLAN EXHIBITS • 50'BUFFER YARD SECTION • BUFFER YARDS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN • CONCEPT PLAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION • ENGINEERING ANALYSIS • TRAFFIC STUDY • RUNOFF STATEMENT �-- _n tJ 7 May 12,1997 96204401.R02 PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES Timarron Land Corporation is requesting a Non-Residential P.U.D. zoning category for Tract II in its entirety. It is envisioned to be a"Mixed Use Business Park" development allowing a variety of land uses that will respond to the current and future market demands and ensure compatibility of land uses through creative planning. The Non-Residential P.U.D. request will divide Tract II into three (3) separate parcels and will allow the following land use categories for each: PARCEL A • Residential* • CS - Community Service District(Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District(Sec. 18) • B 1 - Business Service Park District(Sec. 24) PARCEL B • Residential* • CS - Community Service District(Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District(Sec. 18) • B 1 - Business Service Park District(Sec. 24) PARCEL C • CS - Community Service District(Sec. 8) • 01 - Office District(Sec. 18) • 02 - Office District(Sec. 19) • Cl -Neighborhood Commercial District(Sec. 20) • C2 - Local Retail Commercial District(Sec. 21) • C3 - General Commercial District(Sec. 22) • B 1 - Business Service Park District(Sec. 24) • HC - Hotel District(Sec. 28) * The Non-Residential PUD shall allow ancillary residential uses, limited to the zoning classifications RE, SF1A, SF30 and SF20 up to 10% of the land in the NRPUD (27.19 acres total). The permitted accessory uses, specific use permits, special exception uses and development regulations shall be as provided in the underlying RE, SF1A, SF30, and SF20 zoning districts set forth in Ordinance No. 480, as amended. May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-1 PERMITTED USES It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall permit those uses defined under the land use categories identified in this document (as established in the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480) and shall specifically include those uses described as: • "Permitted Uses" • "Accessory Uses" • "Specific Use Permits" • "Special Exception Uses" • Uses not listed under Zoning Ordinance No. 480 that are similar in nature and/or have not been defined by current technology. LAND USES There are exceptions to the permitted uses. The uses"lined-out" on the following pages shall be considered undesirable for this property and, therefore,prohibited. Those uses identified with a double asterisk(**) shall require a Specific Use Permit(SUP). Sexually oriented businesses will not be permitted on Tract II. RESIDENTIAL I. Permitted Uses 1. RE - Single Family Residential Estate 2. SF 1 A - Single Family Residential 3. SF-20 - Single Family Residential 4. SF-30 - Single Family Residential May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-2 CS -COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses - BY SUP ONLY 1. (DELETED) ** 2. Higher education institutions ** 3. Museums, libraries, fine arts centers, and similar cultural facilities ** 4. Golf courses, parks, playgrounds, community centers and country clubs (No commercially operated miniature golf courses or driving ranges) 5. (DELETED) ** 6. Public safety facilities ** 7. Religious institutions ** 8. City hall or other municipal office uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations) May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-3 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 0-1 OFFICE DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses A. Office Uses 1. Accounting and tax preparation 2. Adjustment and collection services 3. Advertising agencies 4. Architecture 5. Banking 6. Bill paying services 7. Business corporate headquarters (when used for office purposes only) 8. Business holding and investment services 9. Chamber of Commerce 10. Chiropractors 11. Computer services 12. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting 13. Contractors offices (provided no outside storage or display permitted) 14. Dentists 15. Duplication and mailing services 16. Employment services 17. Engineering 18. Finance 19. Interior design 20. Land surveying 21. Law 22. Management consultants 23. Optometrists 24. Other offices of a business and/or professional nature 25. Physicians 26. Podiatrists 27. Psychiatrists 28. Psychologists 29. Radio recording and television broadcasting offices and studios 30. Real estate and insurance 31. Savings and Loan 32. Securities and commodities brokers, dealers, underwriters and exchange offices 33. Stenographic services 34. Title companies 35. Travel bureaus or services 36. Utility offices May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-4 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. Public, semi-public and private parks ** 2. Recreation and open space ** 3. Libraries ** 4. City halls, fire and police stations, and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) ** 5. Other uses of a similar nature and character May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-5 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only 0-2 OFFICE DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses A. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District B. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-6 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT II. Permitted Uses A. Commercial Uses 1. Offices of a business and/or professional nature 2. Bakeries 3. Barber and beauty shops 4. Cleaners, laundries and/or Laundromats ** 5. Gasoline filling stations that operate in conjunction with small convenience stores 6. Grocery stores and/or meat markets 7. Newsstands and/or bookstores 8. Restaurants, tea rooms and/or"take-out" food establishments 9. Tailor, clothing or wearing apparel repair shops B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. City hall, fire and police stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations). May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-7 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only C-2 LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses 1. Any use permitted in the 0-1 Office District 2. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District ** 3. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundries and washaterias 4. Antique shops 5. Retail sail bakeries 6. Bicycle sales and bicycle repair shops 7. Blueprinting or photostating 8. Book or stationery stores 9. Business colleges or private schools for vocational training of office related careers 10. Christmas tree sales 11. Cigar or tobacco stores ** 12. Cleaning, dying and pressing works; laundry and Laundromats 13. Confectionery stores 14. Custom dress making or millinery shops 15. Dancing schools 16. Day nurseries 17. Delicatessen shops without size limitations 18. Dog and cat hospitals (excluding large animal clinics) 19. Drug stores 20. Dry goods and notion stores provided that the floor area of such facility not exceed eight thousand(8,000) square feet ** 21. Duplicating service, printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing and offset printing ** 22. Filling stations or service stations, operating with/without a convenience store 23. Financial institutions 24. Florist or gift shops ** 25. Frozen food lockers 26. Grocery stores and meat markets 27. Health service facilities 28. Jewelry stores 29. Leather and leather good shops 30. Optical goods 31. Photographs, portrait or camera shop and photo finishing 32. Radio and television sales and servicing 33. Restaurants, tea rooms, cafeterias, fast food and"take-out" food restaurants 34. Shop repair services 35. Sporting goods, including gun sales and repair 36. Tailor ** 37. Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales 38. Variety stores May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-8 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses 1. Any use permitted in the C-2 Local Retail Commercial District ** 2. Auditoriums, theaters and cinemas 3. Coin and stamp shops ** 4. Commercial amusement centers and bowling alleys 5. Commercial art galleries ** 6. Conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses 7. Department stores 8. Dry goods and notion stores 9. Electrical and gas appliances and supply sales, electrical and gas repair and installation services (excluding propane tank sales) 10. Hardware, paint, and wallpaper stores 11. Hat shops 12. Health and physical fitness centers and gymnasiums 13. Hobby shops 14. Household and office furniture, furnishings and appliances 15. Lodges, sororities and/or fraternities 16. (DELETED) 17. Mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers(excluding cemeteries, crematories and mausoleums) 18. Music or record shops 19.Nursery buildings 20. Pet shops 21. Piano stores, musical instruments and supplies 22. Plumbing and heating appliances, repair and installation services (excluding propane tank sales) 23. Printing, lithographing or duplicating jobs 24. Retail stores, business or shops for custom work 25. Skating rinks, ice and roller ** 26. Taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of special use permit(excluding sexually oriented businesses) 27. Toy stores ** 28. Upholstery shops - furniture 29. Variety stores May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-9 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only B-1 BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT* I. Permitted Uses A. Office and Commercial Uses 1. Any use permitted in 0-1 District 2. Administrative, executive or editorial offices for industrial organizations ** 3. Apparel and millinery manufacturing and assembly 4. Banks 5. Barber and beauty shops 6. Book and stationery stores ** 7. Computer manufacture and research 7a. Day nurseries or equivalent child care facilities operated principally for the benefit and service of employees working within the office building or consolidated office complex 8. (DELETED) ** 9. Electronic manufacture 10. Funeral homes (excluding cemeteries, crematories, and mausoleums) ** 11. Lithograph, engraving, printing and publishing ** 12. Manufacture of medical and dental equipment ** 13. Manufacture of musical instruments 14. Medical clinics ** 15.Nursery yards or buildings for retail sales and landscaping companies ** 16. Optical instrument and lenses manufacturing 17. Private/public schools 18. Professional/business schools 19. Retail activity of a service nature designed to provide direct service support to the businesses and employees who occupy the remainder of the office complex 20. Retail uses which are reasonably related to the principal uses within the structure ** 21. Scientific and professional instrument manufacturing 22. Security guard quarters (excluding living quarters) ** 23. Small parts manufacturing and assembly 24. Studios for training in fine arts B. Community Facility Uses ** 1. City Hall, policy and fire stations and other municipal uses(excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills and transfer stations) * Any manufacturing use within the B 1 zoning district shall require a SUP. May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-10 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT I. Permitted Uses ** 1. Hotels and motels ** 2. Parks and playgrounds which are publicly owned ** 3. Golf courses which are privately owned ** 4. City hall, police and fire stations and other municipal uses (excluding wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, and transfer stations) May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-11 ** Use Permitted by SUP Only DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS It is intended that the Non-Residential P.U.D. shall adhere to the development standards currently established in Zoning Ordinance No. 480 as amended and furthermore shall comply to all new ordinances as they are adopted for each land use category with the following exceptions: BUILDING SETBACKS Setbacks for Tract II land uses shall be maintained in accordance with Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the corridor overlay standards. When located adjacent to or across the street from residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan,the setbacks shall be the greater of the 4:1 slope or the minimum setbacks shown in the following table. Setbacks shall be measured from the Timarron property line where it is adjacent to residential areas. Setback Adjacent to Residential RES 35' CS 100' Min. 01 100' Min. 02 100' Min. Cl 100' Min. C2 100' Min. C3 100' Min. B 1 100' Min.* HC 100' Min. * Once a specific user is identified for Parcel IIB the City Council reserves the option to require a 300' building setback from Carroll Avenue at the Site Plan stage of the approval process. May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-12 BUILDING HEIGHTS Maximum building heights for Tract II land uses shall be in accordance with the following table: Maximum Building Height RES 35' 2.5 Stories CS 35' 2.5 Stories 01 45' 2.5 Stories 02 90' 6 Stories Cl 45' 2.5 Stories C2 45' 2.5 Stories C3 45' 3 Stories B 1 45' 2.5 Stories HC 90' 6 Stories May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-13 BUFFER YARDS Perimeter buffer yards for Tract II shall comply with the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and shall have minimum widths in accordance with the following table: Adjacent to Carroll Avenue and Primrose Adjacent to Lane Residential* Other RES 50' 25' 25' CS 50' 35' 25' 01 50' 35' 25' 02 N/A 35' 25' Cl N/A 35' 25' C2 N/A 35' 25' C3 N/A 35' 25' B 1 50' 35' 25' HC N/A 35' 25' *Residential adjacency shall be defined as residentially zoned property or property with a low or medium density residential land use in the comprehensive plan adjacent to or across the street from Tract II. If a specific B 1 user is identified for Parcel II B,the Planning and Zoning Commission reserves the option to require a pedestrian barrier along Carroll Avenue at the Site Plan stage of the approval process. Refer to the Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan exhibit for the general location of each buffer yard type. May 12,1997 96204401.R02 DR-14 50' BUFFER YARD SECTION ADJACENT TO CARROLL AVE. AND PRIMROSE LANE 50' BUFFER YARD w e. \11114105° z • 11D-s# a um- S ItOr 'NI ‘ P-11110 . 0 1W PARKING ' --\ 40, ' 411 &. -T%VW .J _� Ø ..� �-- - �, ir 3-8 HT. MEANDERING _ �' -�; BERM . r- ..... I I -- •(AVG. 5'HT.) , MAY 12, 1997 96204401.II LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping will be provided in the amount of 1% of the lot area for every story from two (2)to four(4) plus 2% for every story from five (5)to six (6). OPEN SPACE The open space for each tract will include the buffer yards around the perimeter of the project as required by the Southlake Corridor Study and the additional buffer yard adjacent to residential uses. The open space also includes lakes and floodplain areas. A HEC-2 engineering study performed specifically for this tract of land will determine the location of the improved floodplain and floodway areas and the open space will be located according to the results of that study. The site specific HEC-2 engineering study will be performed at the development plan stage of the approval process. There will be no impervious coverage permitted within the improved flood plain area with the exception of pedestrian trails. Timarron Land recognizes the value of the existing vegetation and will incorporate master design guidelines that respond to tree preservation, at the development plan stage of the zoning process. A tree survey will be prepared for the site plan submittal. The developer will comply with the tree preservation requirements of the City of Southlake, as those requirements are developed. The attached Buffer Yard and Open Space Plan illustrates the general location of the proposed buffer yards and open space for Tract II. May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-15 ONCE A SPECIFIC USER IS IDENTIFIED FOR PARCEL IIB THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE OPTION TO RE UIRE A 300' SETBACK FROM CARROLL AVENUE AT THE SITE PLAN STAGE OF APPROVAL O° p p° ° A AG ° SIIA ° O° v AG p • b o 0 0 i LV.D. MD1L LUD. - MD.R. LUD. - M.DIL L.U.D. - MD.R REFER TO THE G ADJACENT O O n $ 89° 3 ' 56" E - 2142. 69 0 L C o OR EACH NAME ° O O ° O 0 N 2 2" E ° 33' Big YARD ACE I� o 00 469 El0 n REQUIRED ADJACENTTO FJ TMG 3 0 sFmA 0 0 LUD`J. AG MD RESIDENTIAL USES 53.d0 t ACRES o o LUD - MD.R. ° ° O , 18" E ° PROPOSED ZONING a °O AG LUD. - AG LUD. - AG 4 NON - RESIDENTIA& PUD °D LG G °� LuD.- AG AG MDR MDlt LUD. - "MD(ED USE BUSINESS PARK' o � O o O p 'pAG AG MDED USE ) a WUITECHAPEL ° (PXSIDENTL J , CS, 01, Bl) O •O ° W. - p VD. - O - ° a8 o .R. MD1L 0 I a AG m O.W. AREA EXISTING TONING AG O LU.D. = LDA R0 96± ACRES EXISTING I�. = MIT M USE • p� pq O� PROPOSED D. oMDq cp USE 50'BUI77ER YARD /OPEN SPACE _ - - — - - — - - — - - - - O • • REQUIRED ADJACENT TO GARROTE AVE. N - - — - - — - - — - - -- - - P�TIIv1ItQSE hADiH, I AG 25' BUFFER YARD UIRBD BY _ D ° p ° �^..i LU. - L.R D O I CORRIDOR OVERIA DINANCE } ��JJJ p BD CARROLL AVENUE--,ri c0 O C) 000 POTENTIAL. BNTE o R.O.W. AREA LuD.:Gj LDJL O ° - 0.00E ° O COLLECTOR SYSTEM• p 1.60tACRES ` ° N uD. - S 89° 56' 08" E U.D. - LDIL pro Lu u 575. 22' Q°Q ° O CwJ� 0 90 `U % 130.97 * ACRES L D. - \ P OPOSED ZONING _ i / SFyA o" 7;6HD NON - RESIDENTIAL PUD w LUD. LnR 3 53 � 87A / G \ USE BUSINESS PARK' / F7A i ~ m _NON -RESIDENTIAL PUD,osEb ZONING o SIDENTIAL, CS, 01, B1) / N LyD.= LD� / EXISTING ZONING - AG / 1 Umi / ^Mixn6./USE BUSIN PARR" EXISTING LU.D. - MDCED USE / o LUD. - LD. / / (!CS, Ol, , HC 02, Cl, C2, C3, Bl P t ) PROPOSED LU.D. - MIXED USE / � / `• F EXISTING ZONING - AG (�^ / l IX .,�< c•�' ` EXISTING LU.D. - MIXED U S. ll4 PROPOSED LUM. - MIXED USE ° LL R O. o APPROX. FLOOD PLAIN LVMITS / N 8 9° O� r" W / ,0 is a ACRE$ N 89 09' 9" W I o + c. 552.56' 1 ° 1 3.3 \\ n2pR v�l7pp�.. jr' F N 9° 3'2 W I p-- °pO-- -o° -- --- 00008 - - - S 00° 08' S x 0 ��?� .9 j i . N 89025' 02" N . O 247. 6T'" �'• �' '` / APPROX. FLOOD WAY I A4I L LU D.R. V G o O B' BUFFER YARD REQUIRED S 89° 574 Lu = ,' : LUD I BY CQ$RIpOR° OVERLAY ORDINANCE 144. S 105 ' 02' E _ - 266 64' o oo A LUD. LDJL S 000 44' 01E 6 99.84' / AG O 8 88 40' 49 - N 39" W LU LUD. - W) :� AG C3 i !Q 1 ' LUAG o LUD. LU o O i MAY 12,1997 CITY OF SOUTHI.AKF TARRNAT COUNTY,TEXAS CARTER & BURGESS, INC. OWNER /APPLICAN71 PLANNER /ENGINEER• 77M4RRON - WESTERM CARTER & BURGESS INC 7950 ELMRROOK DR. PARCEL A 53.40± ACRES PARCEL B 130.97 t ACRES PARS C 87.53 ± ACRES INTERNAL ROADWAYS ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND WILL BE DEFINED AT THE TIME 7605 YIRGIVLT PARKWAY SUITE 250 GROSS SITE AREA 27L90 ±ACRES OF USER DETERMINATION AND SITE PLAN McKWNEY, TEXAS 75070 DALL75247 (972) 529-5988 APPROVAL. (2t43 LL (AAREE AS AYPROXIMATB) 0 150 300 600 900 SCALE 1 =600' ^Ip "all — P. U.D. - NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT A(MD USE BUSINESS PARR" — PROPOSED RO.W.AREA — 25'BUFFER YARD O — 35'BUFFER YARD — 50'BUFFER YARD LUD. — LAND USE DESIGNATION M.D.R — MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LDA — LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AG — ZONING - AGRICULTURE CS — ZONING - COMMUNITY SERVICE P.U.D. — ZONING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SFI - ZONING - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MFI - ZONING - MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 01 - ZONING - OFFICE C3 - ZONING - GENERAL COMMERCIAL ANCILLARY RESIDENTIAL USES RE, SFIA, SF30, AND SF20 ARE NOT TO EXCEED 27.19 ACRES IN THE ENTIRE NON-RESLDEN77AL AUD, AND SHALL NOT EXCEED LO DUL9C ONCE A SPECIFIC USER IS IDENTIFIED FOR PARCEL LID THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE OPTION 7n REQUIRE A 300E SETBACK FROM CARROLL AVENUE AT T7I SITE PLAN STAGE OF APPROVAL ACCESS TO PRIMROSE LANE WILL NOT BE PE LIMED ACCESS TO CARROLL AVE WILL BE RESTRICTED TO ONE FULL ACCESS LOCATION FOR RESIDENTIAL USES OR ONE EMERGENCY CRASH -GATE ACCESS FOR X 01 AND CS USES. COMMERCIAL USES (Cl C� AND C3) COMBINED SHALL NOT EXCEED 50% OF TIDE PARCEL AREA FOR PARCEL "C' IF A SPECIFIC BI USER IS IDENTR?MD FOR PARCEL IM 771Z CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE OPTION TO REQUIRE A PEDESTRIAN BARRIER ALONG CARROLL AVENUE AT THE SITE PLAN STAGE OF TILE APPROVAL PROCESS TRACT NO. II NON-RESIDENTIAL PUD ZONING REQUEST CONCEPT PLAN FOR 27L90 ACRE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN This submittal responds to the concept plan requirements defined in Sections 30 and 41 (as amended by Ordinance 480-C) for a Non-Residential Planned Unit Development. The size and location of this tract offers a variety of potential development scenarios to attract quality users. Flexible tract sizes, facility locations, access and zoning are critical to attracting quality users to this site. This concept plan provides the flexibility which the current market is seeking. TRACT II The following table demonstrates land use categories permitted for each parcel within Tract II. The attached exhibit"Concept Plan" further illustrates the general location of each parcel. PARCEL Area LAND USE CATEGORIES A 53.40 ±AC Residential, CS, 01, B 1 B 130.97 ± AC Residential, CS, 01, B1 C 87.53 ±AC CS, 01, 02, Cl, C2, C3, B1, HC SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS • Ancillary residential uses RE, SF1A, SF30 and SF20 are not to exceed 27.19 acres for the entire Tract II Non-Residential P.U.D. and shall not exceed a density of 1.0 du/ac. • Access to Primrose Lane will not be permitted. • Access to Carroll Avenue will be restricted to one full access location for residential uses or one emergency "crash-gate" access for CS, 01 and B 1 uses. • Commercial uses (C1, C2, and C3) combined shall not exceed 50%of the gross Parcel area for Parcel IIC. • Once a specific user is identified for Parcel B, the City Council reserves the option to require a 300' building setback from Carroll Avenue at the Site Plan stage of the approval process. • If a specific B 1 user is identified for Parcel B, the City Council reserves the option to require a pedestrian barrier along Carroll Avenue at the Site Plan stage of the approval process. • There will be no impervious coverage permitted in the flood plain with the exception of May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-16 pedestrian trails. • The landscaping area for each lot will comply with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance No. 544. For 02 and HC uses, additional landscaping area will be provided in the amount of 1% of the lot area for every story from two (2)to four (4) plus 2% for every story from five (5) to six (6). OUALITY AND CONTINUITY OF DEVELOPMENT It is Timarron Land's intent to have in place master design guidelines to create continuity and quality at the development plan stage for Tracts II. The design guidelines will be available for review at the time of development plan submittal. May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 DR-17 I MAY 12,1997 CPI'Y OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRNAT COUNTY, TEXAS CARTER & BURGESS, INC. 0 100 200 400 600 SCALE 1"=400' l` U PROPERTY SUBJECT TO CORRIDOR OVERLAY REGULATIONS AREAS TO BE PRESERVED AS BUFFER YARDS OR OPEN SPACE PROPERTY DESIGNATED ON THE LAND USE PLAN AS LOW -MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL - - - FLOODPLAIN LDMTS (APPROX.) - - FLOODWAY LMM (APPROX.) THE CORRIDOR OVERLAY TONE INCLUDES THE ER1HtETY OF ALL PROPERTIES F170C{ ADJOIN OR ARE LOCATED RTTHB4 W OF THE FUTURE SHB4 EXACT LOCATION OF THE FLOOD PLAIN LIS41S AND PRESERVATION OF OPEN SPAC3 VML BE DETERTO.YED BY A HW-2 ENODffFRIN i STUDY. TRACT II BUFFER YARD AND OPEN SPACE PLAN FOR 27L90 ACRE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Engineering analysis for this project will be performed by registered engineers, licensed in the State of Texas, and meet the requirements of existing ordinances and/or governing authorities. The intent and understanding regarding various infrastructure issues is as described below: STORM DRAINAGE Drainage generally flows away from a ridgeline which bisects the property in a northeast- southwest trend. The proposed drainage plan will include the necessary systems required to route are discharge to existing natural drainage ways. WATER DISTRIBUTION An adequate water distribution system is proposed on all sides bordering the site. Distribution main-lines not less than 12" are planned for Carroll Avenue, White Chapel Boulevard and S.H. 114. A system of 12" watermains is planned to provide adequate pressure on a volume required of the potential users, without significant impact to the overall surrounding community. SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM The southerly two-thirds of the property flows to the southeast corner and can be served by the existing lift station on Carroll Avenue. Eventually, the lift station will be removed and a gravity line built to the northeast and connect to the gravity line which flows to the Hunter's Ridge lift station. Currently,the Hunters Ridge lift station pumps to the Carroll Middle School lift station just north of East Dove Street. From that point, sewage is pumped south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. The northerly one-third of the Tract II will gravity flow to the proposed Quail Creek lift station. This lift station is planned for summer 1997. As a temporary measure until a force main is constructed in Dove Street west to Kirkwood, the Quail Creek's lift station would force main back to the Carroll Middle School lift station and south to the Carroll Avenue lift station. A more desirable scenario would be to direct flow from the Quail Creek station westerly along East Dove Street. This force main would terminate at a gravity line at future Kirkwood Boulevard and Dove Street. May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 B-1 TRAFFIC STUDY The concept plan provides for a variety of land uses which will produce a variety of traffic impacts. The appropriate stage in the zoning process to provide a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis is at the time of submittal of a development plan when a specific land use is identified. This traffic study provides assurances regarding the intent for traffic flow and the requirement for a full blown Traffic Impact Analysis for each subsequent development plan submittal. LAND USES The land uses proposed with this zoning change are substantially in accordance with the land uses used during the development of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. They are also similar in trip generation to the NCTCOG model inputs used in the development of the Thoroughfare Plan. STATE HIGHWAY 114 IMPROVEMENTS TxDOT is making progress on the acquisition of right-of-ways and other planning for the construction of interchanges along the highway. The developer will continue to monitor this progress and will incorporate all TxDOT updates into the future traffic analysis. PERIMETER STREETS State Highway 114 and White Chapel will be the primary access routes into Tract II. Internal circulation roads will orient traffic for easy access to State Highway 114. Access to Carroll Avenue will be limited to residential uses or emergency crash-gate access only. THOROUGHFARE PLAN IMPACTS This proposal complies with the existing Master Thoroughfare Plan for the City. A representative monitored the deliberations of the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the update of this Master Plan. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be provided at the development plan stage of process. At that stage of development,the proposed users will be known and an accurate analysis of all traffic impacts can be performed. May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 B-2 RUNOFF STATEMENT Timarron Commercial will detain 100% of the increase in runoff generated by future development of these tracts. All developments will abide by the existing drainage ordinances in the City of Southlake and will work with the Public Works Department to address concerns regarding the effect of this project on drainage. May 12, 1997 96204401.R02 B-3 ` City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-013 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-236 Rezoning and Site Plan/Antioch Churches and Ministries STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I,481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning and Site Plan on property described as approximately 2.9571 acres situated in the J. Childress Survey,Abstract No. 253, and being Tracts 1 E l and 1 E2A LOCATION: South side of Randol Mill Avenue at the intersection of Marantha Way and Randol Mill Avenue OWNER: John Kelly APPLICANT: G. Phillip Morley CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District (Tract 1E2A) and "S-P-1" Detailed Site (kr Plan District with limited"I-1" uses (Tract 1 E 1) REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "CS" uses (Tract 1E1 and 1E2A) LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) RESPONSES: Four(4)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • James White, 1425 Randol Mill Avenue, Roanpke, TX 76262, opposed. "I would like to see it stay as zoned or changed to residential." • Don Cox, 1560 Randol Mill, Southlake, opposed. "Antioch Churches and Ministries plans to use this property as a"Corporate Office"(their words)with daily traffic,noise,lights,and activities the same as any commercial enterprise. This new use of the property is inappropriate in an area totally dominated by single family homes on expensive acreage size properties." • Carolyn Greear Trust, Faye Huffman, Trustee, 6537 Meadow (lire Lakes, Fort Worth, TX 76180, in favor. "It will be a great City of Southlake,Texas improvement to the looks of the area and also increase property values in the area." • Bill Spivey, 1520 Randol Mill, Southlake, undecided. "I would like to see current plans and any projected plans, before I could be pro or con." One (1) response was received outside the 200' notification area: • David Baltimore, 1368 Holland Hill, Southlake, opposed. "Randol Mill is a heavily traveled, narrow. Two lane road with sharp curves (north of Fawkes Lanes). Adding a church will exacerbate the problem. The planned entrance/exit is also a hazard because of the corner." P&Z ACTION: February 20, 1997; Approved(7-0)Applicant's request to table to the March 6, 1997 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting. March 6, 1997; Public Hearing continued to March 20, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. March 20, 1997; Approved (7-0) to table to the April 17, 1997 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting. April 17, 1997;Approved(5-0)subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated April 11, 1997 with the following amendments: 1) delete Item#2C (driveway throat depth on north property line); 2) limit use to 8.2(h)-religious institutions: churches and facilities for worship, fellowship, and education; 3) require landscape plan,including but not limited to F1 bufferyard adjacent to residential property; 4) accept applicant's commitment to provide 94'R.O.W. dedication; 5) building limited to one story; 6) building to be synthetic stone with stucco around dormers and columns; 7) metal gate around dumpster; 8) remove both slabs and dispose of concrete in legal manner. COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 1997;Approved by consent(7-0),subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated May 2, 1997. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all items in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated February 14, 1997, Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated February 28, 1997, and Site Plan Review No. 3 dated April 11, 1997 with the exception of those items in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated May 2, 1997. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-013 Z S.W PD 1 F-a crsoAelouc Dour RO N.. S _- - - r- 1 4 2 e. L ''-_ _ .,......--': • • ZAt , . 1 1 Y •i 1! j �,,,j�O.^,. 1 • I I°`1"""1"4 TRACT MAP I I 1QD' I , 1,�.1pp it r��AR46b '1 ' Y .. J SURVEY A-f069 J..f:icl .1 i •'' 1 1Ai i 1 ii I f i j i.K$ i I f0.15 At I i ! ..,...:: .li.. 2C5 2C6 x 1 x x 2C1 . A 1 E ,C3A `1I 12 11 ■L BtBB• 1 I . �7 2A5 x7 x4 •x x 1' 0 i' i'i i :I 4. 1 til 9 10 2j .. a��:,anf11 I . ` ,,,, in • i _ ra. ��ri 11110 ©h,��l95f II , - 231: 261VII li O'. flit43ry,'._'i..r; gt ff'L'1 D1 A .'IINN _ i ��1 Lii !` T u, -r, 111------- "'`pAK A1E •I •`A IA3 A v +1aaJ/:Iiin17 A ::-MO o IA1 1A7 IF 1 ---- A_ i LL P I 1G 16 ._-L_._. r--• ■ I ! i r i v i i1ESRAKE ►TY LIMIT_ 1G5 1F -'-'r --1--- 4.- KELLER TY LIMIT 'Will i -7 p qIii� i Ii1t--- .-i. 1 6070 , t 1. j j I j I I 613 I 1E 101 1 ?. - 7 i I 1C I I I ! 1 1 '�. b07N i : 1 - _ 2A1 --i. 1-•- 6A2A 1 _ /�.. _y • i 1A(1A2 ! I • 7T- 1 ` . 16A2 i i I �+•i�i I J ; , 6A ! 1;11.-1 I i I i i naai,a'�." �j, r( I! J. WALKERi i i ! 1 jf�i`, i 1 \ ! 1 i i i �� 1 1 i 1 ./-- ' -'+--�. i SURLEY A-I90f i i 1 i i i iii1 i 1 i '_'lii . - = 1• i 4 1 . •.• 1AIA1 Li_- y68121r•. t` • 7' i N ` j 68 �. a ! ,: • --i j j i l i 667A ) i D 1. .-.-.-�._._ ----i- _.-.-1-44.4_4 �� 1A1A A1A 161A 1A1 / \\• • j _ _+.-1 i i I 1686 662 i 262D2E !_ _ ` fin. ` \ 2B7D j !_--�+• 1-L•1�- tAlA2F � �'� D..�i �T- i•d .� i i =.=_.J 1 1 j 1 t•-- 665 663 CC/I.a:r,:ic ! ! i i 1 --J I 1AIA2C i i . \ \` i .I 418. i i i_. , • '17 Jo 6811 co I \ ! i 4.ily 1 I '. i '\. �\ -t.- KELLER CITY LIMIT I i ' �� — -� i 1r Di E I i 1 \ r-- - _ 2C1C1 1 JF3 3F1D^ 307 3i1 3A 3 3E 3E1A - 36 Z s ——9 ® 9 9 9A2 9A1A R .i, f";� i i \. 3F6 3F1C i C p D D i ,.i AA71E'Y A-519 2 3 j R 1B � ` _._.j 2A 3G1 2-5 3F1Hb 1 9A 9A1 .--' G�O O :... m \ �. p JJ 3F1M E f� JN3— Via. . Y`\ Yu JFI� �':. Js-02 �x 1 �, i 2A1 -) �J -_/" == 312 3C11 1 ' 961 ...1 1E1 1A i m\I , .�.- 3J1 3G 3E1 � 1 i r�Cn 1!• 9CI IE I i 1 L' i! 60 At 9Z... •, - 102 -3F2 3F1G J 311 i HILL/WI 1 r Ili --. 1 1 1 l i 1 103 ID 7 --3F11_3F1N_ x' 6Ad L O J . .- •-} , 7C 7 78 7A • 6A 6D' 6A2B A1NER 3 8 -- —�'— -;,.._ w "r -- JOHN J. FRE3NoUlry 29 7.3 Ac OE 2 29 ...i 1! • 1141 1 - A ','k-k. i c"�. ; ` �. T- 19 At 6 Ac 9.SIAc 1 .1E3�i Qs AILS._ _1 I. X. ..NO 1. ._. © i i I �. i '—�•_l._ ._-. 6.1 6 .I��I AYv• .t1 di fC96Mf' • -- i1Ffl l', -I-_. - . i ADJACENT OWNS 11-�. QQ RS TQ15 • AND ZONING om 401 • TR.1A9 TR.s SPIN#12 DAVID BALTIMORE 1 . 99.98 A< �, '\ .�ii �-11" .357 AC 'nos �c W• t v60 sRA ;60 N/ � �+ `"T+ Ac �^ �•U4 E��r U TR.1A1 r TR. d AG ��160 �Ir 1.76 Ac 1ASA P rig - .24 AC Z •L'''' • ' z--I: ��I � x P d 'I N Al W. SPIVEY I D. CO.: TR.1A7 TOWN OF WESTLAKE Ir i - r 2 Ac AG I , , r It , _ __• IDOL MILL PAYE _A; WESTLAKE CITY 27 i • AG - LLER CITY, lMITS 13 I TR 6D1 P .59 Ac W. SPIVEY • • TR:1 ' eITY OF KELLER D7S 2.a - TR 6D7H1 TR 6D7R l ( . .525 AC a TR 607J1 213 I e • J. WHITE .525 Ac TR sD7Q R. MOSER i 91 I� R 6D7J 1.01 I r AG co .531 Ac A AG a a 0 U F - TR.1 E a : TR.' I I 2.1 Ac Z • 6D7K TR.6D �- .579 2.11 Ac PT,TR 16TR.1 A >-AC t I TR.1 C • V I - 1 Ac 0 o pit �- ' - M ?F-4 City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.:ZA 97-013 Review No:Four Date of Review: 5/02/97 Project Name: Site Plan for S---1 Zoning-Antioch Churches&Ministries being 2.957 acres located , in the J.Chidrrss Survey,Abstract No.253 OWNER/APPLICA i r: ARCHITECT: Mr. John I el y.Antioch Churches&Ministries Mr./G. Philip Morley.Morley Architects. Inc. P.O. Box 927910. 920 S. Main. Suite 190 Southlake.Texas 76092 Grapevine.Texas 76051 Phone: Phone: (817)329-4289 Fax: Fax: (817)481-9552 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/21/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICA. ON LEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(81 481-5581 EXT.787. �:•'..?' ➢ °�:.• •,a}• ;?y4�}W'h'J.`2,•• 9 ;:<:�t`+'"rx •'.c:°;•:a�``:�'34•;£n'yk:�,`..:•5::�:�r�i: .:MM. .tJ°, 4:,' kh:�rfr.}• ..k�:}rs•..:. '� „cl••x::;:4 ;5:•:..y:.xnt.:.t..;.;;...,..}..::;.::.. . .... }:+::.:.:..::...'.G,:v:: � .. � :.}' �� ..:l::on.i?;Y. '<.Y•:.::•..:.wYStc<.:n�::::v:.<....}:su•'.,•,. •. :k�R,�:'f�:•r-'.,:•.rv:.'.s:.:r..,Fn.::.:,:::.F,.:w:::.::.}nv..........•.•..• ........... 1. Delete the 30'building setback label located near the northeast property corner. This label appears to identify R.O.W.dedication. 2. The minimum driveway throat depth for the driveway intersecting the north property line is 28'. The proposed depth is approximately 25'. (P&ZACTION 4/17/97:.delete) 3. • ' Note the description,location and elevation of the benchmark used for the topographical information. . This should correspond to a City approved benchmark. 4. Show intended bufferyards on the site plan and include the planting calculation chart. Drive/Parking pavement cannot be located within the designated bufferyard.The northeast drive/parking pavement • encroaches the proposed 20'bufferyard by 12'as shown on the provided landscape plan. Correct the number of required and provided plantings in the landscape calculation chart according to requirements of Ord.480,Sect.42. 5.. . Provide a summary chart showing all proposed variances and/or deviations from the closest zoning district(CS)in which the proposed use(s)would be allowed. This should show the referenced zoning district,the existing requirements and the proposed variance/deviation. (P&ZACTION 4/17/97:limit use to 8.2(h) -religious institutions: churches and facilities for worship,fellowship, and education;) P&Z ACTION: February 20, 1997; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table to the March 6, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. March 6, 1997; Public Hearing continued to March 20, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. i997;Approved(7-0)to table to the April 17, 1997 Planning&Zoning Commission meeting •4 -s) City of Southlake,Texas April 17, 1997;Approved(5-0)subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated April 11, 1997 with the following amendments: 1) Delete Item #2C(driveway throat depth on north property line); 2) Limit use to 8.2(h)-religious institutions: churches and facilities for worship,fellowship, and education; 3) Require landscape plan, including but not limited to Fl bufferyard adjacent to residential property; 4) Accept applicant's commitment to provide 94'R.O.W. dedication; 5) Building limited to one story; 6) Building to be synthetic stone with stucco around dormers and columns; 7)` Metal gate around dumpster; 8) Remove both slabs and dispose of concrete in legal manner. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 5/12/97. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following•submittal schedule.All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Although not required by.ordinance, staff would appreciate placing "Case No. ZA 97-013" in the . lower right corner for ease of reference. * This review is based on the"CS"Zoning District regulations. A revised site plan will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for structures not shown in detail on this plan. * •With exception of landscape parking islands as shown for the proposed parking area,the bufferyards and interior landscape area is required only where new building construction is proposed. Since no new buildings are currently proposed by this plan,bufferyards and interior landscape are not required at this time.However,at the time of any new building construction, interior landscape areas and the following bufferyards should must be provided and should be considered in the placement pavements and parking in order avoid removal of these improvements: A 10' wide type"C"bufferyard along the south and east property lines:- A 10' wide type"E"bufferyard along the west property line. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records and a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,Perimeter Street Fee,Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * d k .o,. 'onal Comment : Churches&Ministries L:\WP i P4.WPD , 'IN !I fi ,\YNI'' '0:11V1%MCI I • 11 1 ' t„1 ii .''.'''l , S311.1.SIMI V Fs 1 °' Ali ! t ` -' # S3H0111H3 H3OLLNY 1 CD, pil Will, - 1661 T 1 lidt/0.338 i 1 III il )1 1 1 i i - • I ,1 I ..._ tr. -e• 'Pt I gill Oil , _. il il - '' ; .• • Ipt 1 I ' 1 t IJii I :fp' Ili I I .-',: - - 131i I I 4 lig 1 . ! j — r I II ma II -" .` ' - .. ...... _ . , 1 miniii...„,. =.1.1' . .. • ... • , . frit I. I - OW i'lARCIIIII: ' Itt Ma c's'::,,iiMWA. .... % • • : • • flail a 131111 IF 1 rifs(44i4 rah 7/:I;i 74 I P.-0,A p p- ii I wfarm4"9 ffirri ar 1 I/ 7 i 1 N OWL: ''.'-'• ' \\X: \ & ;..:\....:\ ‘ IOW ‘\N \ 1 1 1 . I r 1°.'''1 1 l i' 3 rag ‘ . c.. . . • litirmr,--- ,:, _-ri '4\%\, •. ' s,\\N\k,: 141111 ;(:.' tVir,;' -',.)„,,w'''s,--, ..,:-.NN, ',. \\\ \\ t, 1 • ii .. i iiii,',‘: 2,,ig OF 1 . ,..,,,i .-..."Ig, z::.::-_-7::::- e.. .\\\,.\ , .,. ____. IN IgiVii':- I ,.`•:\I\ V, '; --#1 111/* I ii 3 ow 4 i- V, auckq ,iiiigh•g )1 , 'Ai iimw,, I Iiii *A Tgia.4i t k iii • • 11 pi It il N 111111104. N. 14 Q „-s.s, ;.....k _ 4 NI iii i( /II • blii 11 • 1 - y iirkiiii.t,Awf imr... 1,21rii I , i • II 1 Ti9110( ,i1F4, I.V.Mi IL 0 A ill 1 1 \ I , iiPhij ljp. 1 ,iiAligr• 1 \ 1 PI la 1 Iv- r , . . ..1.4, 11it gdA 1 44,44,_ tett J___ I . e'4hil,'‘-*111111FAVIAFA -Sltililirlror5a111 I My".. ........ • I 31110W/1111 MOM 4,,..—eivmermeavois ~ . — _IM-.."".:—.4"""""r= .""\:,...' .. — 9, it -- — — — ..— . -fithiClAirtiPINO. f. I i1 t 1 Ii _ (00, ..., , , c ° 1 - ... , • • ; j XIII TSIN3 11i t I 1 ,— ..` t.- ioa 10S1 I 1 ,^ ! "? S3HOEII1HO HOOLWY I to Eio-G'6 Q/661 I a aav 0a38 V .vw N I 2 I i • -- C v GlC V 0.0 fJi. i) .AN,- ,• j ( V r _$ d N. ...... ,tc..- •------ \� ...... /y� , 4 JYLI R J Y ,:t,w. . c :::..::...""""".",. .., :r v,.045.tri, ......,...,.......„:„....,„ ..,.._:......,,,,,- -- ;,° ��`.- .j ,.... � i r y - r'3i • -- --- 1 _ • • - • ■G '+ �7 - --_:'t ( 1 _ ww V --::-.::77.-.7.--7:-"..:-7.7:2'.....-,"...''..:':.,"i *. C.:Ii f0A0nV40--------- . V;. • • �© it •��' _yEE* Yc;a-1 T1NN"pWVa IOSIIOSI IN E " ?4;' S3ALLSINWV"I d• i o ` S3H3af1H3 HOMINY 1 £io-L 6 1 (00/ 0L661Ta8dtl0, k f } . MIL. • - vdr , - . #. •. .wataitatx..„.....ft........-i.. - -- 43''`Al' ' 1 .111 • c OCIa it coo �`{� f YYYI �j4 .,e 4.... • ;7o:O rr11 �.l4"'a' ":9 "t0 i / •'.zYtv+A• ;,, `ir1 :'ti.- I ;/dili J=tl.,7 iSIX at of f S`. l i; O, ' v C :::,1:' j•�. }{4j.,•�may,ri ii �{ yya:rj i•!';�'�%�� .3 •l�tit-s'•:. :_'ti t:,i;S,yy t;:,�.�-•`. k::: �f, .;+'•F tj . Y;ttut4`fj. t}s`.t.r y i,r.: `t0::. :. `� . �CL!'twjf:i 'y00: ,-,_ ut� 4. ..°:w,77S'.ti A r"-i '.r . �Y a.{tt;! t;; lid i'-. ;[^, ti+++:gy• p +••;• Lifil;PI' y;•.• t.;3<. Yr 10i -.» C:i• , • tito {O=ti ter`• ,' .t I. Jx.•. ;, :1;��!. � :,%•ft•L ti.�i$ .i+`.Si'.:'-c*•� •5:•Ff�r•;il„•'�r:(tj"�{�•:Fi'•"'�'r..O::::: � • '� C Z �.Y 1 i !] dez f. tY0,2�. • X?• :jh ri:t..�, 3 j _ri4".�y�) ,y, Li '\:::;..'iitItif:Itifkleg.g.;;:ip::*.fi?tc.,:ifsirl!, 1 ..-..:1-•-,:VIE!.00.,..--,...„Asva v.. lui *w Y K{ lay. 7 -" I • t A,Gs�-W;.. I jl�l t 1- U4L �' �� a apt. __ �,. 1• 0t J•0 f.... •• a •fit • +tttr� • ..� �.� '• . j 4 i�'�C ��YO� ' ~ :Mike} ,,.. A•' ,IYtf ICY �a�•'t .ore- (A 1 o�'t;'r • i .ram .117111411 1 • • • • Lool. • -- A oif^t winswaramson 'Ad"Wal "444i Ntigaill i orsayard ,,.. % ma AV PP•23 9111Wagl INA:I ilaolielIaliMMtild gattagy pie sap.svo want...±,-. ,....- , - . .., L661. 8 7, e.dtd C.038 1 1"- Ili, 1, ilifii—N %1- I * i GI: • • lel ..14 Pi 113,:,:if..'..!314 1 SS ppm S _ J•it ...A aim gi 11 l' fft,vt It •9\Vir 11 i • a P 1.1 A ft i k n ../ I t I I 1 1 1 1 1,7 7 ill iti I i 3/11 Ili __ ._ - - it, i,gli 1; I I VIII 1111 e 1 1 e e 55 RA h 1 iii 111 i (11419 ova) •go mos . _.....__,.., F. . it... ,s , . ; .i, II . , _ Sa1.4141 Ok 1 ,...ji_ olit ill 4005 k.. ob b • .. .. •- -I-. • „ • .,.• • I • • • • • it • • Iv, '1 I • it. • • 4 • • T 1 • • l•• I • • • I •I I • • • • • , • 1 \ IL )1 • • , I ( -— - - . -- ---- - I I I • • ' S. • I I &5I I ill: 1 sr Kg MOM Di.a •I i r • 7* • • I - I i . • • 1• ob • I N oe = i I 1 41111011'" • 1 4 u•N • - I • •4 • • • •% I 40 f • I oi i i N • • I I V .a.ff I I • • 41t 04 tbi 1 I_ • 1 I 1 'r I I I1 I I •• • • le b i I M • •14, p. 1 i \si 1 •1% • • • i .. . . 1\ • .. , • 1 . II 1 \ d!illiii • 1 I 1 \ I I • --.___-.7.. :• •• 1 • • i ii I • • • • . • 1 I • . 1 • • • • •„ Ft (I" - •• • -. J_L ' 1 . I_ -- --- ZfiCX war PUN VI Vatilef .i.,)•,..- o'• ' c _.... . . ,..., • (re CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-236 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF CHE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING HANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.9571 ACRES SITUATED IN THE J. CHILDRESS SURVEY,ABS I'RACT NO.253, TRACTS 1E1 AND 1E2A,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT USES TO "S-P-1" DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code;and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, ,the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "I-1" Light Industrial District uses under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-236.W PD Pagel ._ it WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites;safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established char cter of the neighborhood;location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic contrail and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Councilof the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes.in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-236.WPD Page 2 /� • (lope and amended as shown and described below: Being a 2.9571 acre tract of land situated in the J. Childress Survey, Abstract No. 253, Tracts 1E2A and 1E1,and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein,from"AG" Agricultural District and "S-P- 1" Detaed Site Plan District with "I-1" Light Industrial Uses to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plah District with "CS" Community Service District uses, as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and.complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative.of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of.the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-236.WPD Page 3 • (tie, and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 4. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance,and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR L L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-236.W PD Page 4 ^ (4 (1".1 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY L (re L:\CTYDOC S\O RD\CASES\480-236.W PD Page 5 � P ' d t • EXHIBIT"A" . .L, _ _ BEGINNING at of 2" iron pin found for the southwest corner of Tract I, said point begin in the East boundary line of that tract conveyed to L.H. Cox as describe in Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 1786, Page 451, Dead Records Tarrant County, Texas, and being the Northeast corner of Tract IT (overall) described in aald deed recorded In Volume 6073, Page 664 Deed Records Tarrant county, Texas, and also:being located North 417.31 feet from a 1/2" iron pipe found at the Sout1 east corner of said Tract II (overall}; THENCE South with the East boundary line of said Tract II and said L.8. Cox Tract, 100.00 feet to a point at the Southeast corner of the called 100.00 foot wide strip of said Tract II; THENCE South 89 degrees 51 minutes 25 seconds West with the South boundary line of maid 100.00 foot wide strip and parallel to the North Boundary line of said L.8. Cox Tract and the South boundary line of said Tract I 417.77 feet to a point in the West Boundary line of said Cox Tract, also being the called West boundary line of said Childress Survey, and also being. the Southwest corner of said 100.00 toot wide strip of said Tract II; ' THENCE North along the called West boundary line of said Childress Survey, at 100.00 feet passing a 1/2" iron pin found for the Southwest corner of said Tract I and con inuing a total distance of 308.33 feet to a 1/2" iron ppin set for the Northwest corner of said Tract I, said point also being the �torthweet corner of said Cox Tract, from which at 5l8" iron pin found bears 1st 1.32 feet; HENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes 25 seconds East with the called North boundary line of said Cox Tract, 417.77 feet to a 12" iron pin found for the Northeast corner of said Tract I and said Cox Tract; . . . • THENCE South with the East boundary line of said Cox Tract, at 19.64 feet passing a 1/2" iron pin found in the occupied South Right-of: way line of said County Road No. 3035, said point being'the northwest corner of a tract! conveyed to Daniel Garra, et ux Rita, as .described in Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 4507, Page 386, Deed Record°, Tarrant County. Texas and. ; continuing a total distance of 208.33 feet to THE PLACE or BEGINNING AND CONTM NXNC 2.9571 Acres of land, of which 0.3931 Acre(' lies within the apparent Right-of-way of said County Road. . __ •:- Y Coe L.\CTYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-236.S P I Page 6 0 66L I g ddli(12:1 I' ,li 1 PI WI. 10..-41.....1 Ei Tr4 ..--, i- •511 SYX31'amyl-linos 1 .coi 1161100NY)] 1091 8.- 1 _111411411111 1).),):.t?)// , S311:11SININ V ' • 05 'I 41.1 7 I i S3H01111H0 H3011NY I • 1 1 .._ rYL-- EXHIBIT"B" I ! , ..„,, ...= i )1 1 - I ' 7 .. .... ......- I) Ap) 1 i Iv 011 ... : ..v , !pi 1 I I fp( 1 itifil 41! bii 1 i:fill WI li 11 P3 -._.I _ ty i k! I. 1 ! 1 It. .. .. ... ., , , , , .... ,. „I . ,.... -: 4,1...„---•- - .-10-44-4., ' -. k: ' ' --7-01 •1" . .'. 4 i dia mac)was •, - : ^. • I - .;., i . , vt • . • • • • • fri...... :,..0111 2 • ,.__eii[ i 1 i .. , „..., • .. • „"- • • • bit! It r/111 41,1M I •• • • -... , i 0411 I Wil*•Vsp-IFI - • ! . la ., . . 1St I p 1. • 1/11. NAZI -,--•: _Awl.. • • • • • I 1 Ita' ' , FRil\ 11111111P ". % ' 1 , il I jrtri i Wil' \, kilill . r 6 610w41 74 Ell ., ..., I IINIZEr, ',,,L 44, 4L'IN ', N • I? ' . . VI' ....ii.iiii,......:;:- 4424-,:‘,.\\---,...-•:.;' ..N, ' 1, -*"..1",,-....:40.,16k,..\\\ ',..'• : :;:7, . ei '.!,.. 1 1 wora:;:ki .o!?sgs..-s4. A -.i. ,,A., :1.. le . • I / .I i W arZ;:-,.7.7:1::_N e•L : ' N 1 - siEl ., r____ • \ . .1 1I mi,:•Zf:: I . - I •r--r--. MI. .. ..g.: i i :& • "it! tl I if . ) 8 "e.'' " • E. itigig 6,',A imi,1 .;•:::..., kie 1Sd , 1;1146 : )11S10: Exigkie • • I 411 I I Fib: f Ali eV • . j ,, , Jim is • & 4 I . aq' . • li ,Fi.....Attir i WWI • • 1 fri - 114,126.7-:,.?:Ikiiiittmlitm 1 ..-_. • ' I 11FiirrOrrilm'ull"kil' ' . , . 1 ' I ,IIII [ri li i . 'IA; -2 1 1 . • ... I I \ANI14111!I 11- # f . . pt • 1 - gmhk-N-kokirti ir II iiiig r r 1 11 . . ....; • 1 „................ "-Noiritui 3nPeNv TIM 1001,41 ..-waN4111•11•114,001-".> ..." -- .....- -- -.... ...,....:=7.7. -- -- -1 ft -- -- -- -- 0111. f- i t 2 11il 11 L LACTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-236.WPD Page 7 Vt... ..-'-t,:- . . •_ • ;OP —"'.UM./ svxai.'3�v-a a nos iE�t, I >'- 3-"-'°" I �.t i E ■ •oa 11iw lOaNva MI itiu } ! i� 1 %)' ; v1 f/ S31S1StNfN '8 • S3H3a(1H3 HOOLLNV I w to F'io-G 4 Q . Q L661 i z adtt GUI tr . .o,K • i i 6 W i . 1 £ yrs wi ' ry: U ii [ �- <lt, . .itti Yt-tt ;-- --- - ,ii t- -- 'max A• i • aummYYYYKYII===mY1M:".01i7mUpQ _-- ---_-- ---=;�., r' t,YYYrrrYYYYYYYYYYrr •Itu u ______ _ n 11YY:,YYYYY=C YCCY�tc pp; ------- ----------- :,t;•lF- ' S•!, rYYY\tYYYYYYYrrYrrr t.,. • . y - _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-------ram-_'; =i• '�•`i _ ----------_- ,: '�•�.'3,.'•,Y'. ------ 2 _ ,- c? , -__-_:::.-.inN. 1- , II • q '• ; _ ' uL• '-,4t j i OOiiReiit%wwii_r=--r.-r- '•*1 r 000- �E . fellyitin oOr; ' . . .. .� • � .fi• , _ : •V1hA '.pi trYYYYYYYYY► _ i q YYYYYYY1YYYt.YYrI I iti ° • -- . --- - --- - ti �jtrtrfa •. --- ----------' ■ �� ---------------- p -- � " - - ■ —f-, -_- _-_-_-_-_ '" '' ---------------=ta --- HF= . - Llr.-...tii.. 3 6., :4 '• • lYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY • (• wiiw iNiiiiiiiwiiNURiiiiwii= ! !�'� z ---------------:i J _iiriiwiir iiiuuiu }fL:'_} r __- --_-_--______ -- -= ti.A,,.Q.n - 1---}}11..._' .. ..-,4t l�•c%_t:��'. •I ---------------- ` 1fF-- •.. ---------------i---..--. a i 7." O -------r �rrraa • - ' WoPlc'_ _=_ ---- - oo ' 7 } Aiii III it, i , ii ii,1ri nou 1 •g. Qt'•7 YYWWPP . O � ' 'I 'o ? -; ._ AWL",. - . i t . (we L:ICTYDOCS1ORDICASESIg80-236.WPD b Page 8 / (� ` t;. . ,......- SYX313)irminos : ill"1 I • I%. -25§3..WeIR . .011-1-11V4 lOCINVII 10c1 li I . •• ' Oil il 1 I i i .i .t') 7/4 • • ) ) •-• i t.,., • - S1111S1NIVI V --w • • ri'd 1 I:i.' i i S3HOU11HO H3011NV 1 •• ? - C)L661 r e 8dv a33a •k . • . . 2 • , • ttl I:- •• E• 0 .• • . - •'.. ft . ,.,. . .4 . . ... — .....• •-.1.. i-2: • 1.. . . /441i oc=10 •-- .".170-4:40...yk.ko IN II II / .1...•-:"j'at • .• -. .. •'71•-•It t •-•:.5.:14 .. ,.,0:-.4ysaj, ,•4?:: E ,, :1-7421: /•° .'''''**% .,:r. co-% .:4•.4e.t-t •t•t•-. [- Baal ...,.....,...., 0-1-.vii,r-,0::...- 1:-.•41:1 li Mg .4**tf..z..!.*i.i.clEgwr,r,,?:: .----/pcz,i11131_,,, 4_04,,,,;;.: I migui",41,1. :-.fyzki3--i71,,...4 :1 ill 1 ri r•...,MI'. 1...v-se, , ..?*4.4"} P 1.-1::fri4le_t•V.::.•• *Yii),:zet;1•::: , ••••:/•; <,:i.'-c0* a-ri•' *- .2,;P: --/-.4..:1:50.0.4%V:•FA. 1-*.Y:S:S.'L 1 17. ,--- q,:x:ctoo-A7.ft. *.:;•• I 1•••••t:ii•-oon.,>!;:•-. ii,...T•-tor.1, :. • r.,-,...r../...-p.-,•:;-.1zr-t,..!..::.4e..-....-.4-;•..:.. ..2;....,..gf,...);;;;V 14 cl"..!.1•;:ft; : C..s.; •zr-04.....: ---.!,'..,rto..1,..'t...1, •....•-.r. ./' ‘e.V.;)•t'C 6 4:,?:•::•••:::OrsiT 1.S-'-' ,tie44r0:T.P.40,0tfri.r0- %i.. • I j;4:4,...,1.,.•':43'f.••P.-,...-.....e.,.-;.n...i. ,...0 •....:••.t.:,:k.;t6(17.1tVg",,,;•,0,04*-4*•.cke. 7t,i, F.... . i?.;4161*.•71,,,_••'Nte.t.q:•i.:-.1.y:ieSep,.11: e•,:.74ANt•-1.•C.eizA••r-).4.../.4•..:.Ar.A-ce.tV•e..lfz.'7. ti3i•Ar..",;" *03%.%414.1:5•Y.4:W.1*.-01.1t,. 7 I'Y'r;471;tilr•t.ri 7141%tr.t':::•'•1:1:47:';:?.•./•.14. •-.Attr:'''4-4,...,10* ".Al0Az 0 ,• •CO.*A•1:.0:1/4,..,_•LV*2.0.,). ..•• • '0. J.;•:45•6-40:4,;,,,,t.1,,C4C.V.%,Pt.L.t.1:(;)14.::•,;.f.ze; 14.4V,f1......,•• s•s-},...., . . I.1.4:14:rok...i.:**:!..5.•$.-:*,i:5,/,„_.=,:.;.;•,42:414..,.,I,;...x..:,:). ,,;.4.,,...)...1.iti'..11$•.fiti."?'1'.. ..4*• .. -•.•:•••‘1“).:•t„:5.1.4._7:-V..rg.,-td=t0 frO4t...:,Vos. '11:S.:•4,4-*.ile;*,:,,....1,„. .. 't: e,.it'--4fael,•1:Pft.Z.::`:,E.F.I.V.'...t';;;;I::0„,:...:4:.,E;t..!•;,.r..-ki •:.1,,,',ise,-'q.i.:`,EEVE.,:2-1.0.1;7:4.::..1.0.0g.trAlifri`a :..i I.. ..CEN:',;40..0.02...rg)r.:•?rtfiVE:fa;leert_ i• ,I ''.-,.41);:.4k:41:1VOI:074E'Vrttt.e*,";•/..:•:FAI:E •,;.\:,',2,1.0.1:7:.it•tr,,,VrEr.,0:Ekfal.Qt._,,el•:rri.:0021....." I7- N3c.ii' 31bli14iO.t61.78i1;%ZiE.!EZ78/?ji.''. '-0•111(4i07f.tMAVW:.. •-•-..b*.-...,.........,•_.4 ........4.t,-.-.4. tc..e.otu uoAd.tiqkf. . • • •litt-,420--,,,Is.okfivreZ0...c. ':. --( :•,vik9„.B.. • • ,•-. # •;••-1(i.--,-.1v.•,:a.t.i.,..A•1-• t.r• ••- I'". • 4;1,- 'coo . •,... .. . . ete.s.kj:-...-4.204:4f.vcr,t1;.....r.-,,tvro. 1 \•.0•••••• ':Itittioq0)..•11.4,svitz- : coo • ••tvcro• "041%.,...%.••-e.•.0.3•:,1, Vegi.,.:17;;,.irrcom;•4 ...1), 4' '; (11ile ..fr-,7)..:1,1-,,,t'o.,,,,•••0- Jzo.; '" ....0-i.-•o....t.t..a 0. 1:39 1 ..\(.40.**907-43:4•7Pirab5: 05 : , lif.:•40:v.;',47.S1.1:t> *.1,47.-,I;i::;, =L'`:4.'sei;s:t•..,471.:VI-•:.!*---a":4 "A,ty:',:,)" icao, ;H.. •,.,..‘4,..,,:s43..t.t•ZAS:"%"/".0 44' ' 1 ' .O'N'tkos.t:Preo" F...:-N ob ••A,,../.4•,--- -'''' '" • • ,.. Lisit:\; .. ICIIA..ti;rigX",•'- 1--- .11...-r-0.0J-we. .. 1 , ..-: ..to.....;pw, -4.•-i•-•.:.:Vii . iiiiine,Y4k-A-°•-•••.-••''''rr• '..°I'vr'e. ra...,,a-:-"•8.-it.i.p.1;1,:x0„:.; :l..:Pzegi A , ••rr..-liu:430,-••• ••kt ===:.: :,-. %;r:Atk,..f...:f :;......:. 'i=1:74,* 's•4.4e:•.ostgg- . 1,....„1:-. • *AV V°")i Vt.4a4 inalli ••'• 1,,q0.0.V.:±amm.,..6`.7-. ..tillY6X** . 1.3t-lt• ........ .%??:ii,:,:ia----_05 -- ,....,,,. .......1..... .. •. \,....v. .nt, . ,ig.:-..,,,,,-....x.-,-„,14 2iiIiihMV 7 • . Til---..,'" • r. All FY 01 . . ?.. .. -'. . i ,• VE , •.:*7 ...- •,_ •L . L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-236.WPD Page 9 fl tc 0 • ,:v, , ff City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-019 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-237 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Harrell Place STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of approximately 5.8438 acres situated in the J. G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18 and being Tract 1 C. LOCATION: On the south side of Johnson Road and on the southwest corner of the intersection of Johnson Road and Harrell Drive. OWNER/APPLICANT: Wayne Lee CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-30" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) NO. NOTICES SENT: Seventeen (17) RESPONSES: Five(5)responses were received within the 200' notification area: Thomas"Van Fleet, 407N Pearson Lane, Keller, TX - 76248-3742, undecided. "1. Alteration of water drainage. 2. Size of lots and proposed price range of homes." • • Judith Wilson, 201.Harrell Drive, Southlake,opposed: • "Restrictions should be - in keeping with our neighborhood minmum one acre lot and 3,000 square feet home. You have forced a water tank on one side of our homes,to lower the value and now you want us to agree to cheap houses on small lots on the other side. Well I just lost my pride of living in Southlake. Why did I waste my money!" • Jerry O'Dell, 425 North Pearson Lane, Keller, Texas 76248-3742, opposed. "Bought here in order to have (*IL_ horse, cattle, chickens, etc. If acreage is too City of Southlake,Texas congested there will eventually be complaints from new owners." • John W. Oldham, 3165 Johnson Road, Southlake, in favor. • Larry and Karen Carpenter, 3225 Johnson Rd.., Southlake, opposed. "We bought our home because of the acreage in the area and the country atmosphere and view. Having houses along this land will inhibit our view, the atmosphere of country, the ability to have farm animals, and add to traffic congestion problem at the school along Johnson Road." One response was received outside the 200' notification area: • Debra McMenamy, PTA President - Florence Elmentary. Resident states concerns regarding an in increase school related traffic. P&Z ACTION: March 20, 1997; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table to the April 17, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. April 17, 1997; Denied(4-1). COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated April 11, 1997 with the following amendment: 1) five (5) one-acre lots and one (1) 30,000 s.f. minimum lot. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all items in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated March 14, 1997 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated April 11,.1997, with the exception of those items addressed in'the.attaohed Concept Plan'Rediew.Surnmpry No::3'dated Mar 16;:. 1997. • • . Due to the Commission's recommendation to deny, a super- majority vote (6 of 7) of the City Council will be required to approve this request. L:\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-019ZC.W PD t-/ C C April 17,1997 To Whom It May Concern: As a parent and PTA President of Florence Elementary, I am concerned about the zoning of nine lots for homes opposite the school. Traffic is already a tremendous problem in the mornings and afternoons and with nine driveways entering onto Harrell Drive, delivery and pick-up of students will become even more difficult. Please consider these issues as you make your decision. Sincerely, C /41 Debra McMenamy • REC'D APR 171997 -- , III-II_ II ! 14. 6A1 1 1A1A1 4 ..,.' ........ 1 I 6 33A1 .! 110.i--1l!i•l x.--ar-Intri•i'.l'.a-°41p•1.Y",fR,.- - Se..-''.•--..----\‘- l.-'-T'11.i—-1-1!--_----------------72--1 1-11'i•--44+ii'-i-4--41iiiki---44i41iri 4÷-i•4irii--j•-44ir1j1!1-- .-.----/-- - 6812 687AC6BB6SE67 l A66688823 4(I4 I m29,3 1A2ciA IA21A 1A2DiA 1A21EA1 A11AA12AA I'E6 11 -- 1 684 1A31A1Aff2 C - 1 A1A 6C 689 ----- --.-..-.•- 6811 M ...- 1* I . '‘ / \ \ --i . KFI I FR ClUMI T ..- -! 4,, / '\ ft\ - - - : - - — _ . _ -77., n-li• ilk,ihri I yi yto 1,4 . m , x,E,Ar „„ z 8 --m 9 9 9A2 9A1A 1--: D ;I SUIRCY A- Yll 3FIC 2 3 I W0°) '6 1 9A 9A1 __•-• , I ng9 31-5 ____56-,:, x, 004 riz I, 3'9 me Ill-- --I I- s.,•.• • • 1E1 981 11) I i 1,-- __,31.2 3C1 .--.. i i 1 I. L./ El ,_ -i— —[51.3 3111. ' In xi 3H -, i ...i. ..e IVE" I 9C1 .8. I r 6D A $2 3F1G - ti-Ill•+.1 . i ..11 ID i- i., • i i 1°3 OA( .X ,,• ... 6.4. =IM 51F -- 1 YlN --•.-- i Lt,6Ad • 3 BA) 8 • 1 4A II41 :;•• -+ •-,. -- 7C 7 78 7A I. 6A 60 8A28 114C4 NI ' i'-' 4/7:;;ANI41 ' li i ‘ H JOHN J. FRE3NOUR 2 Y, I I.3 bp ! - •I1 01 ,.... ,. 7.8 Ac ,.II • 2.9 j_a_. 19 MOW•••••• 4 4AI 6 8A BA7D 8A2C App• WO .-1 'Alajr i. , -- . • , ,..- Li , ,Vr:',..i.i Em 1.1 7 i i INF .; • --- air_ • IT A MINI UGI .1---‘ 2 iFiillill: id ,.. I _..... ! Elk JOHNSON ROAD ' B B II _ _ _ ..„ _ _ _ _ _ ..... _ e 1B j I ! 0 ..001 I 14 11 E 2E5 2C7 2C172013 2C2 2C3 2C9 2C1(2C312C32 1 1 1 -,- 1 p --r-r. Ti .,....- 102 6" 2 2 C C .. _-A.i-- II -----1 'i.-----ri--- L 1 I I ! !- . -I • 1 / IA1 i i I 1B1A , eL. 6 8 , -\-- -t- -I• .11--1, e#4t •ROME I 4 ..Alirt. tag__ HIIr -.822:1._._ ELEM. 128 At '• ! 4 -.--.-- % r -• :. , 1:4 ,,..7- ,09,1 2A3 1 III 1E08 SCHOOL 1 ll 4•‘. ‘ \ 4 e'' 1941P-rtcr i i 18181 I 2A2 - ....._. •._.• , ..- 2E .- . 1:: - 1 1; i ....• EU ,.- ... I •-•rgf i ----"--1---.-:1. 131 A ; 59 t------1. •-•--j---\•' \ I .-`' .-----' _.- 93 Ac • i 0 i 1 fo; ! -i .-------. ... --ri— , ..j, LA., i # —: r 1 --,----. ....) (yr .141W• fti ' -4.41".4.:i40145.14-11:41111, •i ir04 . .5 ie I I 1K' Cl -._ 20 Ac -- -- -.--.!--__ir•I------ 11-.**2"01 2A1•" , \ 1 I ---- 611•92IA ,1• 2A5 - . . . -. i .•- . 427 2C26 • j• ., . . • . • ..... . ... . • , • . .. - . • • .... ... 1-.. I • • • 5A2A. .*8.5t.1,1„ -.: 's.,-- . •.1 4-.. .. L.. 4 . . -044- ._ __,......... 4A 4 4A1i4A 4t3A.,,4A A 5A 13 - ty. .2A4 • • . , 0 ID 5 6A W1 •1 ILI 4A1A 4E01 ' 4 r G. A _LEN 1./ f— 1 I - ' - • 4 4 1 pi . ! .. .g • : 5C1 . , 1 . -122 Ac 115. • -4184ES . • ' ': . , . , Ili , •. 44‘ ‘ :III•.A.1: ., , .4„, Au . . . • •- • •• • . : . • • • • • tO Ac 48 • .' 4F SA1 .. 9,2 ,- . • i IA1 1A4 IR . _. zo).... --11 8.4 Ac lavf Ae• - . '- -,15.4 Ac . 1 .. . - AS)17.i • . 141A -.- - . ttit6g1114 "T i i 1A3I 1A tj 61. ,r1EIPAc.2_k ! . 2A2 1A2B 5 At Y 1-)4E 1)11/C44-- i .11 THOMAS J THC 6A 6A1 68 682 6 6E f . I 1 ! I l' i i i 18 I HI 1 tiny-r 4 4C 40 _ MIL AFJ ' .e" 6 • 8 4A16 6 Ac 2 Ac 5 Ac 7 Ac 1 1 18 v 0 2A2 1414)titlail4,44,c, 4., II i ! jjj • ii i ! iii . 4.13B . 4A16A ,---1 I : —1 6C4 4 '., 6c2 16C1.1 • 9.65 Ac 6B2. 4Ale .••• — 4A 6C 6. 681A1 J83113 41 4A9 r 36.17 Ac TRACT MAP / 6C3 I • 182•"1-k%11111114Kt.,/ i.4. 2A3i,::•!..:. r 1 tr • i 44,19 ' '5 P Al1 181Alw 61 7.86 AC 1 g 4A8 1 1 2 Ac o I I I : L.° '• Y 3 I I I II II I KR i FR WY UMIT 2 'IMI, 6211N . 5.4 Ci t „pal - new-ro• 11 4 :, 0 ' 014 - -7 -4-1 0 .051 1 Iliila #fIll-r.- 11.27 Ac ..0014• 0,.... 3c I LA. CLAY SLIMY A-346 CIWIr AM:1W° , • ...... Teri , 114........ , - . . AUJHI.CIV 1 VVVIVCI'CJ . SPIN#16 JOHN AND LINDA WILDER — AND ZONING _l �i 1g6� .30 Ac . . ' • 2 TR.4G _ .51540 - 15 2 a D. MORROW; J. RYAN — i t TR.4B TRI.iK 1 34 Ac .30 • 1 • 16 1 II • J.VETTER - J.OGLES - i TTR.41� _J M. BRASELTON I L .L_.... . II ' 'ti ___, • . �I - - - - - - - - - - JOHNSON—RI - - -- • • • • ...•...... ?I: . al 2 I1 TR.1B �01 ` _ • ,- II 1 Ac R 4�liAN o . 1 • . . ... •... .I P II i II 4 5 w • . . •. .. w' cc • 3 II w °' AG u SF—1 A cc o II Ir' - 1 J� �1 .1 - CS ` ' 2 P.ATLAS • --- Il SF-1 A • II . 1 M. HALE . • TR.1 G TR.1 F 6 Ac ' m 7.887 AC . r) II TR.1B1B . ... u •• • '• J.O'DELL R.1 C . 2 Ac 6.0 0 IILI AG TR.1 B1 B1 KELLER ISD II Cl) 2 Ac. • -C.CALAME . • . • • I co '" .`• lI 61 B2 �1 � TR.1 q 1 AC �I 1 T.VAN FLEET • " • II .AG Tf3., , = . a II o . TR.1B1C •• s. f II -. - . 2 Ac B. POULIN I I. •. AG ) - , • - n c TR.1B1A. . . / 2 Ac J.WHITE :/_ -1144 I1 II1 2 3 4 A.WILSON — Sri • • R.OSBONE F.GAUTREAUX • • i' GRAY LANE r) _cJ tl �+ 2 I I I . Ar,Pg a 1 _ •- City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT P AN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 97-019 Review No: Three Date of Review: 5/16/97 Project Name: Concept Plan for SF-30 Zoning Request-Lots 1-6(previously submitted as Lots 1-8), Block 1.Harrell Place being 5.8438 acres located in the J.G. Allen Survey.Abstract No. 18 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Wayne Lee LandCon. Inc. 3220 W. Southlake Boulevard 2501 Parkview Dr.. Suite 610 Southlake.Texas 76092 Ft. Worth.Texas 76102-5803 Phone:(817)421-4040 Phone:(817) 335-5065 • Fax:(817)638 ,252 Fax:(817) 335-5067 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT 817)481-5581 EXT.787. . �l ':`:::.•'•:..i. .: . ..... :...:: :"�` •: c :. : .:•i?•.•.r."?L@ .:.:•:� ::.?;...,.:?;.••YY:':fcr3:::.: .?✓ ;::.:rf?'f3,.:? .::.i:..'.''::?f•':5.•.•::'/? :::y..,.. i to •. .:.,•::...::...n..,:n•.:... :,.f,`;::::.!-:, 5::>:,;>:;;,:: ?;':G?::.k.:,;.x..... .?:.;l,+; 1. Label the land use designation (L.U.D.) according to the approved City Land Use Plan for each property. 2. Correct the following information in the land use data summary: Proposed Land Use-delete "SF30"from this data item Total Number of Lots-reflect the new lot configuration of 6 Lots Estimated Population-based on the new proposed number of dwelling units Density-based on the new proposed number of dwelling units per acre (1.03 DU/Ac.) • 3. Correct the lotting and total number of lots shown in the title block. P&ZACTION. March 20,..1997;.Approved(7-0) Applicant's request-to table to the April 17, 1997 •: : ' Planning&Zoning Commission meeting• • • • April 17, 1997;Denied(4-1). • COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 1997;Approved(7-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated April 11, 1997 with the following amendment: 1) five (5) one-acre lots and one (1) 30,000 s.f minimum lot. * The applicant should be aware that any structure placed on Lot 1,Block 1 must face Johnson Road. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Wayne Lee • LandCon,Inc. AWP- 9CP3.WPD ,or..N-W 1_•! • ' Z. O tiig;s11t1ij� Pi TA; � IIr ; yi ' rn !e it; ft• .i.± j iy II 17 i1 i i t i i . c _ ri z ii y ht i.{ di 1 i'y t11t•! t• 1 t ij tf 1 g - (111101 tl. # iii Ill lj,'i 111 i]! i ij i! if 1 �2 W . w C M . • i1 I.I(`;11;t.ilk 4 t�ti+'I't filif o 4.ti Nil t. I D g >- " a c IN' Os • I; 1 I i••il iIPIt' gIi ! ®1 I. i is bibv IIr Ili- :10 .�., . .,.ii ii.il...i 1 9,i.l1;1111i']iiIf htiIMt 1!'1iI;11,1i19; 1 w i I lit o iii 1 l 1!41 Ir i liG 'llipi,P Pde 4 i fIj in {, 11 01 14 I.4 4 I xi EE tj1. 1i;�II t 1 i t!i1�f1 II 1 al jjI I ililt lilt h i i Ira I:IL li sit Sit 11.11611 11 i 1 in ill 1 i I i I 1 tj • _— I 1 -- --it Or= — 1 I I' ;.i i.1 1►14 1. 1 Its 1 sis 1l Le, r_ / vo...-1,-/ 11 ____I . . , ittkv ,/.24 /„i.‘ —1.....+:;-.— . i I , i 411?1 / vf_,, 4k,\\ ::;� .x. lvt-irib • i.,A 0 ,,. $111'11 .1 § r — . --A-% ——4............. • I 11.‘ • 1 . % di ti r 4Sik -4.4. _.---.„----...- I 1 ' 1141/116/ T,;�'''' I j I 1 i I _ _ 4 If ;: = _.L.•L_—i 49 1ziJ it_ Li 1 s MID.1.w r..wIIMw • (pi CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-237 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.8438 ACRES SITUATED IN THE J.G. ALLEN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 81,BEING TRACT 1C,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-30" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT,SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; LPROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. REQUESTED ZONING: WHEREAS, the City of Southlake,.Texas is a home rule City acting under:its Charter • adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI; Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, •. • . WHEREAS,-pursuant to Chapter 211.of the.Local GOernmenr Code,.the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and'map regulating the location:and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-237.WPD • Pagel n(7_ n Le" changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; • location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those ce who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water,sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is . • a necessity and need for the changes.in zoning.and has also.found and'determined that there has been; . . •:. a change in the conditions'of the ptoperty.4uirounding and in close proximity.to the tract or tracts ' of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts.of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, Cri is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-237.WPD" Page 2 —g (1.1., Being a 5.8438 acre tract of land situated in the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 81, being Tract 1C, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-30" Single Family Residential District, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development ce, of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances . except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the • provisions of this ordinance. . . r: Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance•shall. be deemed to:be severable and that if-the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-237.WPD . Page 3 r-lC_9 • or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: C CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-237.WPD Page 4 1(-./0 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY C C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-237.W PD r _ Page 5 �1 l- 1 1 EXHIBIT "A" Col COMMENCING at a 1/2" iron rod found being the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2. Vista Trails Addition according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-95. Page 3. Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas. said iron rod being the intersection of the existing north right—of—way line of Johnson Rood and the existing east right—of—way line of Cimmaron Trail; Thence. North 89 degrees 41 minutes 54 seconds West, along the existing nottt right—of—way line of said Johnson Rood, 127.33 feet to a point; Thence. South 00 degrees 18 minutes 06 seconds West. 65.85 feet to the Point of Beginning; BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod set being the northeast corner of a one acre troct of land conveyed to John Wayne Oldhom according to said deed recorded in Volume 11355. Page 217. D.R.T.C.T., said tract described as Tract I. said iron rod also being in the existing south right-of-way line of Johnson Road (County Road 4091); THENCE. South 89 degrees 59 minutes 53 seconds East, along the existing south right- of-way'line of said Johnson Road, 113.91 feet to a 3/4" iron rod found for corner. said iron rod also being in the existing west right-of-way line of Harrell Drive according to the deed recorded in Volume 10957,E page 1767, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE. South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East. along the west right-of-way line of said Harrell Drive, 1289.32 feet to a 1" iron rod found for corner; THENCE, South 89 degrees 36 minutes 24 seconds West. along the north line of Lot 4, Block 1, Cimmarron Acres according to the deed recorded in Volume 388-181, Page 8, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, 228.35 feet to a 1" iron rod found for corner; THENCE, North 00 degrees 00 minutes 18 seconds West. along the east line of tracts of land conveyed to James R. White according to the deed recorded in Volume 7254, Page 1282. D.R.T.C.T., Bertram Poulin according to the deed recorded in Volume 6180, Page p 432, D.R.T.C.T., Thomas Van Fleet according to the deed recorded in Volume 12091, Page 1675. D.R.T.C.T., and Cullen F. Colome according to the deed recorded in Volume. 11741. Page 1398, 529.16 feet to a 3/4" iron rod found for comer, THENCE. North 00 degrees 00 minutes 31 seconds East. along the east line of a tract of land conveyed to Jerry Wayne O'Dell according to the deed recorded in Volume 8886. Page 829, 131.63 feet to a 3/4" iron rod found for corner; THENCE, North 00 degrees 01 minutes 37 seconds West, along the east line of Lot 1, Pearson Lone Addition according to the plot recorded in Volume 388-170, Page 22. P.R.T.C.T., 100.01 feet to a 3/4' iron rod found for corner; • THENCE, North 00 degrees 01 minutes 56 seconds Eost, along the east line of Lot 2. of said Pearson Lone Addition, 99.91 feet to a 3/4" iron rod for corner; ' THENCE. North 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West, along the east line of Lot 7. of said Pearson Lane Addition, 80.18 feet to a 1/2" iron rod set for corner, said iron rod also f being the southwest corner of said Oldham tract (Tract I); ;' THENCE. North 89 degrees 59 minutes 09 seconds East. along the south line. said ,, Oldham tract (Tract I). 114.60 feet to a !/2" iron rod set for corner; THENCE, North 00 degrees 00 minutes 51 seconds West, along the east line of said Oldham tract (Tract I). 349.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The tract of land herein described contains 5.8438 acres of land. . (owl L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-237.WPD Page 6 EXHIBIT "B"' 'a t$i "1 'lII'1!i }t. t 3/I idli A j. j „ , 1 iti Lilt{•��', i j 'ii`I�1 '� 'E ' ' ` ' "� rn Z Si :1;1 t,j it iti 1 1 11 11' , 11� ff l 1 11 1 l� 11 la .f 1 R _ C M Lii ��tIi11I1 Ift 11111 (11111, j!' 1It111111111 1!III !'fillig„ 143 1'!•,11119p i'.d : a ll Ill 1 / I_ a b ii iL!i ff11111 1401 .t*'1tifk.11la.., .: . p1 ' I-jIi ,111 I',}1li 1! liS 8 �^ 4 III.!1 s .1 1ss+ si.li.l.5 1 I tii k 9 x 111 !pi i,Ii11 Ii1I' Iti I i I1 I1� I.1+11 g1 . °�1jja If., .1 .t.S'.l.f, 3ne I', !INfI1iIi.0ifiiv,fIir,t1IIi .1I x lb ,� i Hui iii1i Iigi It11 I,Ii1 IL_ti1 ill II.I1 Iif II II 1 I ®ls i zi a 1ai i• • • I' 4 • __-_-- ...T....,.A,. t 1 �1 g ,d 11 iil i1 I 11 I 18 ;! ��L. r ........, 11 / p ti / III sits I sit: I sit: J ig 1 E 4. / / /` ; sirr , ,. / I, ,m / _� , , Ail- : gNIA. \\I. ri.3 11- 'N' ----'17 Ih litor dviiiiiiii \— r 1 _ T , Il- , — — _ #T ; I_— TT, � r ,,, I,. 1 ill ii 1. I I I e I iii N t 1 1 `,_! 4 r.1t- lid 4 tt I Ie 1 Ii I—• d 1 A \ _ , I i I -Ii d Fill,Ir ;P i ;I. I ;I, I ;P 1 ' ! �'�' i 1 _77'. "31 ___-- .� 74:►_ — 1„L__1 •rAxclosS _ . - - l-. T)t R➢iM. L 1—T�VlA �. j � ti.,...,--.11%.49fti,T70, ,1 y • 3 NM 11R1 aft.W..111NM.1 LACTYDOCS10RD1CASFS1480-237.WPD Page 7 y` t 4- City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-017 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-240 Rezoning/Tract 1B3A. F. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511 STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of approximately 0.505 acres situated in the F. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1511 and being Tract 1B3A. LOCATION: 1966 East Dove Road, on the northeast corner of the intersection of East Dove Road and Royal Oaks Court. OWNER/APPLICANT: Dennis E. McConn/Phillip Burnette (See attached Property Owner Acknowledgment) CURRENT ZONING: "CS" Community Service District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20B" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Pamela Carter, 1911 E. Dove Road, Southlake, in favor. P&Z ACTION: March 20, 1997; Public Hearing continued to April 3, 1997 due to Case Limitation Resolution 95-24. • : : • . . April 3,•1997;.Approved.(6-0) applicant's request to table uiitilahe:` • • . April'17, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. April 17, 1997; Approved(5-0) to continue public hearing to the May 1, 1997 Planning& Zoning Commission meeting. May 1, 1997; Approved (6-0). � µ - I City of Southlake,Texas COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 1997; Approved by consent(7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that the Zoning Administrator has waived the requirement of a Concept Plan for this single lot residential proposal. This request from "CS" Community Service to "SF-20B" stems from the fact that the existing house on this property was a parsonage for the Unity Church and was subsequently sold for a single family residence. No changes are being proposed either in lot size or in the existing square footage of the home; therefore, no variance for the existing septic system is required at this time. However, should the home be expanded in the future and if this expansion would necessitate expansion of the septic system, then the Board of Adjustment would have to grant a variance to the expanded septic system because the property is less than one acre in size. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-017Z.WPD • L 1 N'' a- 4—L4 —1:fm i 1 r :5 1 AM r Fc2JM SUU r.�AKt c.:UM lit V 6 7 /4689370 P. 2 Zonlog changes P,4G 4 of 4 Property Owner Acknowledgements: (must be signed and notarized by all owners,use additional sheets if necessary) As property owner,I have read and understand the attached "Guidelines for Posting Zoning Signs"and understand it is my responsibility as the property owner to place the required signs in compliance with these guidelines. I hereby release the City of Southlake and its employees from liability for any damages which may be incurred to my(our)property in the erecting,maintaining,or removal of said signs. I hereby understand that it is necessary for me or my agent to be present at the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council public meetings to represent this request. Agent Authorization (not applicable ) : . I, j) lies)/5 E ,4 1 e6 k1 , _ owner of the aforementioned property do hereby certify that I have given my permission to P,t4 &),t)E 76.--' to act as my agent for this rezoning request. 1)r= .�/s 6 �U kbli g — 12 Signature of Owner Name(Typed or Printed) Date Lfore me,the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument,and knowledge to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes and consideration e an the c aty therein stated. Given under my hand and seal of office on.this the _ day of. l9 f FGNCENE HALL lam'%� er„u' « Notary Public w STATE OF TEXAS Notary ublic In and For Texas , : :t.-i y C , Exp.o5!to/97 My commission expires the_/,` day of 7/. 19 97 • • (1,„, RECD APR 11 1997 04/03/97 11:48 TX/RX NO.3391 P.002 II 70 -'3 1--T —T-4- -� to -� __ _ - IA -'- __ :, ir` _ I j SIC 'N j !—_-- �, 1h-_�>\�?• \. 1,47( r./1FL'�-,• ■ F 1C I '. I. i ; i 1�:4•m•AAR ';�./ • ,:o. 1.+.' 1 � 18.8 Ac / ij•! �‘ t. • - I ♦ . I♦. v , 1 27 Ac 4.... Ci --l.-I-.--J J + �/. ',,' '�. 184E ,�I SEIM 1._._._.. I 2CON ■ HIVEIVS 2 1 1 i'`.L,; T ,•.��*I f" ON ,Bz ®II� / ' - A-3N zc 1 ..., /A-1... :i LEO(n�AII D 1A1 �,/ 's. . C FBI 1`!.•,�' r.\lu;:�.il'as �j`�I�M i i, --•-- 11 Ac IIL7 i. BVV SUQ1ty. A- I1 -t— i --._ 1AIAIA1&1AMA1A4 IA1A1A / � `-- • I ;-_____ 26.87 Ac 15.12 Ac 1AIA1 IGl r.h 1A:us, aw.. '1biLLOIftli _ ("i 1vgt,ibI, / 2A ... CO COjaC8,..7D,..5.........,..'A1cI 6C7 A.O2EC1''1`1I.111. .iIrC,- II.% II g m-4 111a111 1 SCHOOL 1 i 1 1 t I 1 t 1 I 1 . . -.).1--I1- ICIi/: g. ut.oegn twERAD ,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I A AIA2A 1A1A1A3 _ 1 / L(n+."'. ! 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 — —.— 1 I 2A3 II H ' TA OLIT , �ye1e2. UN/NCORPCRATEU' CAgp 4.18 Ac 477771 Ac 395 Ac 1"2 181A IC 1B1 32Ac/ ® . / AZ:: SDl\r - r ;:' !" )'1 1GG .t 1 1 i ! - I .-A4+11-444 1 i II 14 i .. ,.... i . .., _... iti...,..., Li_ ,,,. ,„,,,„,, 4 WI 2C5 42,41 2C2 �b i ; \ i � - 1 Li 1 Sty 3 t7 Ac ( 1 i ®* / i s - 1P _.._1,rym� ,, t.� r 58 3A1G4 ViQ 3A176 / • — 10I ';�ily01'1, CRS ' 4� 2, f4Y I pi ® 10 Ac �_.- 3 I.10.98 Ac ; lE7' � ♦ IR ®� „ 2 s ♦_ 1.1 j i 3A105 SAtG 'f� ♦ ,I C I �;�� 1 �I �� 3.21 Ac 3A182V. sIii -----i.-- - i •! ii 3A1G3 �♦ 3A1K 18, r 4„M• q i i 121 Ac j j `I 1�� } - 20 2 1 • 1' 4atr' 4A 1 I_ I J S_._ V. .- 15.56 Ac �.yl©;' .1°1 F �_ to /% - .�-©� i t—':,:ui1.:Ua caa' --pD� 3A1H2 i • Ll�i i I j I \ GI♦ 10.4 Ac 5 �11 }rr lel(1 011 `.�.' 4A , - — 3A1112A �I t r31 `Ik.,. 5H .... 3A1D2 3 j i 2c' 11 ✓.-�" _, ' JACK D. : 9.47 Ac \` j i ®�11� ��('� 3A1D1 3A1H3 i I ,I-3A Jo}IlZSON "--- n,-�'!�. 2f Rf: ELEMENTARY i4 t_ 3A1H 3AIH1 W"_._. 6.7 Ac �'OR�Ie ,, NNE UP ___ " ='$01 ®� '4 ` i . �; V 111 3AlA j 3A1J2 3A1J1.- 1, rA,1 •.. 5. .X, _ _' ,r / t l '� PpR _ m -._G � - 1 3A1J4 8.13 Ac ._I .__.�6`;1)1 ®1 T' ':,.a.,,a.�: _-..; \-•• ..ri f♦'1 -.`II 18.94 Ac T H jljlt•. ;14} ! •-;et. y -��,.,_. 1 f EAST HIGH • STREET • , y4��..d6. ■tu . ..'1 lell :- 1. ' . . . . C• '1'11:4:4 i'''I :q _.... . . • (.7"....... 102 NM I 2A`. ��, 635D2B Ac 502A Mtn re irsuillial Ea.'. i F� WMJ - ',-',* i7. � 1 8.75 Ace �Or+7E 1/ - 80.1 Ac 57 aoi-,d il, .y, .._ ,,,Ai TRACT MAP : 3 - _` /I 5A}A1el 5 i III i i ` •4 SI 5A3 Ilig r yT t] fJ I ! !•G' �'� , i 1 5A4 501 1 E. l+,1�' I J SUP1[Y A-F.r. 41 101.. !..•4- THOMA3-101 I i 1•, ..c • i i i J 28 2A 5 ` i _ s A 20 2G 2C 2 • ' 4 • TR 1 EE 1 ‘ _ W TR 1V p CO.- o516 A • 12 W ' Cp C . . . • w . TR 1V1 8 _ . P 2 - O x i � .46AC Lie 1.45 AC TR 1P �I A a . . U •45 AC 10 Qc� 3 TR 1 W • jib- 13 . 6 .5 AC - TR 1P1 45AC 6• rM SF-1 A • TR 101 1�IEASOtIT .SAC TO 1.421 AC • 14 2 TR 1X1 • 5 F 6 • TR 1O •5 AC R. MCPHERESON • 5 AC r- TR 1X F. KOEHMSTEDT 1 TR 1 R .5 AC TR 3A1E 1 4 _ — ' _L.SMITHI 1 AC , TR 1Y TR 3A1E •• • 1-1-j •74 AC ' ' TR 1 R ; 1 94 4 K 1 AC TR 1Y _ • 1 AC • CS E ,a TR 3A1r4 - �- S F-1 A ' .85 At; 1 ' J. BEVILLE P. CARTER • ilk `•` p0 . ' TR � A �I•. V �- ffllR P TR tZ IA U 2 F' Tn15�� 0 1 AC ; t:+ • , • I: . z W D.COX 7� + • ! U 2.39 0 . • • 1 t. 3.9. •J. REAGAN TR 1 EE2 a • .18 AC �N H . y.. TR te1 �' • W. RARTHELE Y t208 S . YET f • . ' • G. HARGADINE E. WILLIAMS ''' 14 f . il Ilt 2E2 " COIN'. 2.1 TR 2B TR 2C1 N?'}. • - • t .98AC •5AC R� SF-1A G. •-;• ! + TR 2C t: I V J. ' 1:874, AC • . . i. 3A;K ADJACENT OWNERS TR AC s . •]:...,i: :. :. .. .: 15.56 Ac AND ZONING LSPIN#5 JAN FRANCIS I TR2 • 0 2.95 AC 1 TR 2M . f f: 1.02 AC • $UAVEY PLAT'OF TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN PREMISES SURVEYED: t.-.DAVID-POLLARD—A Re/hived hnfmfonl Dad Surveyor.eo Ivey easel Oita er<tet atrrey emu lode at one Soma this doe ands my manilla,of lit 1dloang descrdvd prrtvrty. • • SEE ExHIBIT ILA" • r. ...._-..L- - , . .rk them ate.1\30 nemeremean?in de anotelat Monty or de seOO.Ingm•eram spins y decr rnrerty hems is — 1966 FAST DOVE ROAD — 1 I.•OT' 15 Po. ' rtr�YAl_ toA,K� AbbITIGh.t 8 n VOL 'See-ISb Pc 9. S 89° 43' 8 14sS.24 !t•r.,e - ,.., y.. A r ti-:•..rot. 1 I q ,n so` I Kt 01 $1 a e�Mt 2T.96 ,41 �'1 / /Y.-.solo N b4 I . ro N • �b�r s �. ►_- Ati`' I 1 f 1 "Li inst. r•; II le r<cr t, • e. ,. p q • i . L . ,. .e. „A,..., • . 22,000 641't 1"_-SD 0.Urb AuC r n • rt ad . 2 ��:be O F 7 tr- s� 1',J� '� ___/ ^ DAVID POLLARD �� r GF# CE95-74378 • . • `�� 1518 Q:t. ' • STATE OF TEXAS • s U R - COUNTY OF TARRANT • "To the Lienholders and/or the Owners of the Premises surveyed end to FLOOD NOTE:I hereby certify that the property desetlbed herein SAFECO LAND TITLE /5-Al a 7— within a special flood hazard area as identified by the The undersigned does hereby certify that this survey was this day made Federal Insurance Administration, Department of Housing and Urban on the ground of the property legally described hereon and is correct,and that Development,the flood hazard area being IdeMIfled Is Z Oi{/G there are no discrepancies•conflicts.shortage In area,boundary line conflicts. >4.. of the Federal lnsuran Administration Flood Hexed encroachments,overlapping of improvements,visible lints or roads in place. Boundary ap effective on0•/ /Oj/99 3 co" shown hereon,and that said property hn access to and hoes for the �,ape_. _ Q6/-Z�ORQa,QG. oadway except a shown hereon." : JULY 19 y 1995 By: • CAMS FOR BEARING: ' AP SURVEYING CO. Order No. 07-95/95 Dwld Pollard RP811510 • NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION • 1003 Control Drive'Sulfa 300 Radford,'IX 78021 Metro(817)267.1240 5 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-240 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE.COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.505 ACRES SITUATED IN THE F. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1511, BEING TRACT 1B3A,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT TO "SF-20B" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT.THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; Lir PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL- NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. REQUESTED ZONING: WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of.the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and . . general welfare;all in accordance With a comprehensive plan; and - :•• - .• WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "CS" Community Service District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake Texa s, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-240.WPD Page 1 thre changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those c ...„ who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, 1 WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake,-. Texas;and helps promote tlie.general healthAafety;and welfare of the.community;: .. '• : . NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, C., is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-240.W PD Page 2 Being a 0.505 acre tract of land situated in the F. Throop Survey,Abstract No. 1511, being Tract 1B3A, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "CS" Community Service District to "SF-20B" Single Family Residential District. . Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. ...•Section.7. - Any person,firm or orporatioT1 who vioiates,:disobeys, omits,neglects or.. 'refuses to'comply with'or who resists`the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-240.WPD Page 3 M until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: L CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. . MAYOR Cr- L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-240.WPD Page 4 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY L L L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-240.WPD Page 5 1 ' EXHIBIT"A" (10, BEGINNING at a found 1/2"Iron rod in the East line pf Royal Oaks Court(a 60 foot Right-of- Way),said iron rod also being the most Southerly,Southwest corner of Lot 15. of Royal Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-153, Page 9 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County,Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 43 minutes East, a distance of 145.24 feet to a found 1/2"iron rod at the most Southerly Southeast corner of.said Lot 15, and in the West line of a tract conveyed to First Baptist Church of Southlake in Volume 4360, Page 139 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas; THENCE along the Westerly line of said Baptist Church Tract the following: South 00 degrees 15 minutes West,a distance of 27.90 feet to a found 1/2"iron rod; South 15 degrees 15 minutes West, a distance of 179.59 feet to a found 1/2"iron rod; (re South 72 degrees 27 minutes West, a distance of 29.39 feet to a found 1/2"iron rod in the North line of Dove Road (a 84 foot Right-of-Way); THENCE North 32 degrees 11 minutes West, along the North line of Dove Road, a distance of 131.16 feet to a found 1/2"iron rod at the intersection of the North line of Dove Road and the East line of Royal Oaks Court; I It THENCE North departing the North line of Dove Road and along the East line of Royal Oaks* Court, a distance of 99.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 22,006 square feet or 0.505 acre of land. • L L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-240.WPD Page 6 t City of Southlake,Texas Lir STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA97-046 PROJECT: Site Plan -Texas Commerce Bank STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for Texas Commerce Bank, being legally described as Lot 2, Block 2, Village Center, Phase II, and being approximately 2.158 acres situated in the Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049. LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Village Center Drive and Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). OWNER: Texas Commerce Bank,N.A. APPLICANT: Corgan Associates, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Village Center NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) RESPONSES: None • • P&Z ACTION:.,:`' . :May 8,1997,Approved(7,0)to conti•nue-Public Hearing'to tie May'• -; . . • •. • 15; 1997 Planning& Zoning Conirnission meeting. May 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to the Site Plan Review No. 1 dated May 2, 1997 amended as follows: 1) deleting item#5a(required minimum driveway throat depth); 2) amend item #9 to allow the vertical articulation as shown along the north and south facades; 3) allow the night deposit lane and box on the south side of the •building as proposed by the applicant. . 4) accepting the applicants commitment to provide 6" caliper canopy trees for 4 of the required 8 canopy trees within theCaw' bufferyard adjacent to F.M. 1709. - • �l Z - City of Southlake,Texas STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 2, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-046SP.W PD , 4/A1: 4A i L._. 2 }...0,, r' 3AIC2 su �a_.__ ,S,Y: A: L \ _'F. n,r l CI 1Jt • IA i i i �t'r1 CA� --7� 2v 31 2C 1. i �l I -- IN51?ViN 1 1 ( T :.' y J^ r3A1H2 _�1'1yA R6' 10.4 Ac 2FZA .IA 31)4 Huge 11 \\\ --• 'd V 14 �� ''.• M 11 l 1 `1 1 3AID2 3M3AIMA1 A i i'•2F3 2F4A 7F41i sr•. -. n 1 -,.' .. Jl D. �'�. i 9.a1 Ac 3A1D1 3AIH] ! i' 25 1 r 4C 1 4F3A ELEMEJOHNSON •._.-._ • - 3AIH 3A1H1 6.1 Ac a1 1 :L,A4 R5 II.EI�TJTARY -1-} 2E 2E211.L>rL>riri At (1141., �{-�`I/ ,`•A 1y - 3A,A i 3A1J2 SAIJI�:(p�$ A 1 �I - `. '• i Ac F 1 rah I.-� _ _- 4 W .•.._-. .-.-._._.---. �A 2A3 1 n1!i r:eal�- 1^1P'' . pRA1J4 &13 Ac D . _ �� imme,moor/22:4.1:CO m 18.94 Ac '- - TN I i ..�.r P . _- 2 2 2 2 11 1 - 44Cr© ___ - 3A1J }A1J33A1J P3A1JIP__._^_.__._2A1 '"A6 5 A 11 I� . - • �.0 +IW_ 5} I 11 ,, 1 . EAST HIGHLAND STREET - 11 I' Tl� I l 1 I 1 , 19 1 1C 1A 2D r 2F 2C ,�1 1 11 I 1 E1-�`r-,. {TTT • 1C 101 1F in« . IE I 6-2E 0,•- _ �pRR011 CALROLL IE3 I -_ 2E1 . � �1�rA 1 1gERMEI 2 5A1 SE I b SCHOOL —..\' 4 2J 2c soz ID1A �� ,,r' 8.75 Ac 502A 102 0 1D2A , —��pNNA 5D2B ��r ll IG n6 nA iA2 I I t - ; 1 2A4 8.75 Ac5A2 503SD4'- At --' 0�1 5F �, ._ 80.1 At ) ;i 50 ,,1 f''L: ! -281 1 2 �. HALL I, p I _ SD1A 9. I &LL p,_. 1 i, AlI 3A 30 \ 3 TASA KEY A-687 r-.�� F� apIL�qq��ii I2�/� 5CIB `��'.... `JC i i i i i 1f9061fY/r��® lS�®� - I� 15A3A1 T I' ( AIN i i i i .s 3Ba LL s .+._.a ._ii.__it• • qTF i' 501A11A G •� .0 ,L SA4 v' 2 SD THOlkils 1�--lfll HM c;; �za, �� 0-*.'"1"-;IIIIIIIIM suelEr A-ra 282 28 28 i i ;' AJ 28 2A 2 5 �I SA4A `,� 2D 2C t 2e1A 2C1 5 5C1 5Q-- .- -. �i I \ 285 .! . , _ _}+ _ �) TY } pp0 n ' �� 7 2K( ( Gil ..-'._ ._ .'r SA is 0KN�T ..mili, -- 5B2C 78_....... a L. %110 1 I 2A for r .... _, ^ i •i •i• NORTHWIIIIIIII lib ES a' x xt ! 0:0 WES 'KWY EAST Ac 3DSA 3C 2A1 • I. RpR Et13A1 SD4 JD,(T.0 1709) 2A2 +c +� ZA 2c 2 29• •1�.• •1e2 ,e , j •i •r-•1. S,Ai • �' ,e2B r-i ley. 3e1 f3VV�l�i• J 1s Ac •• les 51 A< 3 ss A< -�• •GOP' 1 _ • Spa, , R0 -ti• aa 2E 2A3A In 2A3 • : 2 301 ---- IS Ac�•� r� �,4 • 3 At 1 1l 22.n Ac �; 2A; ._ • 302 1C I 2A3A j j ` ! T `\ 1 / ^. \` \ '1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 -1 • _^��• / ` `. 0 8—• .- / , , 12.09 Ac • . .A• .m.:� 401 4 j; ...---..:;0,4,' i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 '� A� ' — s . I. .` Icy+. I .-i'_.4...4-• -4-4--ir--- II V0 __ ID ;.Gs -.,._. . . . . • . 3 ap .` -�, .` O 1 I 1 I 1 1 ! •-'-f �$ ' —'--- -----' `•'. .Y '� rr:aa�::u:auaoA1�1,1. - 1-- .- .- - - 1 g t o Y' 4E1 - . •AI- --'aril'• -i— _ -•i • -----'---'- s -- r— -, X a.': i <4?,FiN i F. I FlI ,, ..451 3 ____ ___ {[ l' IT 20 Ae ;\ % .>, r j `, i 1 i ! * '! S 5 1 1 I ! 1 ---'-�-( �_._ ._._._._.-'- .(16.0., • 1 --- i..----"..." . - •p. Ir 6N i i I -J TRACT MAP 6K� 6K1 51,05 I� ; •, m . ®' I 1105A1 1 - �•� 1 -3133 3 __— [? I. 3 6.15 Ac riliii L RAINBON ST. 6A1 ,._,_._._._._._._._ I;t 1 I I S/ , • ' • TK � G . ti - T R ‘, .2o.26s3e • TR • 4.1 1 . . - . @ 1 - i E, \ .1 TR 6F 5 1 TR 6 j2o.2653 0 ,Si/° it All.. 14 2 a • _g.0'l6 RC TR 6C© 4. E • -- - - - - - - - - - - - - --SOUTH KE—$L11-D:----• --- V � • . 2.33 • =I.0 1A1/ 3,. m TR.2D �t a .047 0 . . .074 • : TR 281 , q 1R n ., A .164 0 5 .51 AC •L11 S AC �� y 1A 25R1 V o v • �0 2.07 .0 .- - % • TR 2 : • 4 2B ) k Z ‘ .607 0 : - • . a ;. 2.726 AC w A ~ Z ,�`'� . is . . • • Tit 28 • -1 0" 2A :IS . . ' 2 . • .50 0 Q 1.41 0 14.586 AC 1 v$ it1 ID — II/ I . ` - - 25R2 • p I2C- 1.001 0 1 0 ,:... •ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING 01-May-97 w w 11 j I 9wner Marne ZJtning \ \l •%' .�� 1 T&M SOUTHLAKE DEV CO, C3 2 TEXAS,STATE OF C3 24, I h.' \ - 3 TEXAS,STATE OF AG E� . IL FRANK,MARY FRANCES AG ADJACENT OWNERS FR "I0 ... .�.. FRANK RITZ COMPANY, 01 U 9 6 TEL SUPPORT INC, C1 AND ZONING j A�52..,,,,.:,. C 7 TELESUPPORT INC, 01 SPIN #4 JANET MURPHY ."'. 8 TEXAS,STATE OF 01 • r k' '- t 9 FARRAR,JAMES P ETAL C3 J' cil. . 0 • City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 97-046 Review No: One Date of Review: 5/02/97 Project Name: Site Plan-Texas Commerce Bank Lot 2,Block 2.Village Center Phase 2 being 2.158 acres located in the T. Mahan Survey,Abstract No. 1049 APPLICANT: CONSULTANT: Texas Commerce Bank Corgan&Associates. Inc. P.O.Box 2055J 501 Elm Street Houston.Texas 77252 Dallas.Texas 75202 Phone: (713)216-5092 Phone: (214) 748-2000 Fax : (7.13)2'16-2245 Fax : (214)653-8281 Attn: Tom Dohearty CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/11/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS'SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties: a. Provide the adjacent property owner's name,existing zoning,and land use map designation ("L.U.D.= "). b. Label platted properties with subdivision name,filing record, lot and block number. 2. Correct the west 5'Type A Bufferyard to show the following required and provided plantings: 3 Canopy Trees,6 Accent Trees,22 Shrubs 3. Add the following note below the bufferyard calculation chart: Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrubs • obtaining a mature height of three:feet(3')or greater must be planted at a minimum-spacing of - .- . '.thirty inches•( :0")on'ceRter rontinuous.along all.paved•edges of the parking or drive areasatiii. . ' This iriay require.additional shrubs over and above'those=required within-the adjacent: . bufferxard. -..4.' •-- Please correct the iininimum fregpired interior landscape area_(excluding bufferyards)to reflect30%of. - the structure's floor area(2050 s.f.±).The applicant may provide over and above this amount... • 5. The following-changes are needed with regard to driveways: - a. The driveway intersecting Village Center Drive does not appear to meet the required throat depth of 100'for traffic stacking. The provided depth appears to be approximately 70'.(P&Z Action 5/15/97:delete) b. Provide geometry for the right in/right out driveway as shown on the attached exhibit. • c6. Include the existing/proposed zoning of the site in the Site Data Summary(C-3). 7. Labelentrances and exits to buildings. 1 I - S • . City of Southlake,Texas 8. Show the location and/or dimension the distance to the nearest existing fire hydrant(s)from a property corner. Show any proposed fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be installed according to the Fire Department and Public Works Department requirements. Label the size adjacent public water line(s). 9. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation on the north, south east and west building facades according to the requirements of Ord.480, Section 43.9.c.I.c. Compliance with the articulation requirements are as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. (P& ZAction 5/15/97: allow the vertical articulation as shown along the north and south facades) P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997;Approved(7-0) to continue Public Hearing to the May 15, 1997 Planning&Zoning Commission meeting. May 15, 1997;Approved (7-0) subject to the Site Plan Review dated May 2, 1997 amended as follows: 1) deleting item #Sa(minimum driveway throat depth required 100); 2) amend item #9 to allow the vertical articulation as shown along the north and south facades; 3) allow the night deposit lane and box on the south side of the building as proposed by the applicant. 4) accepting the applicants commitment to provide 6"caliper.canopy trees for 4 of the required 8 canopy trees within the bufferyard adjacent to F.M. 1709. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan.A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No.479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records,a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be.paid. This may include . • but not be limited to.the following fees: Par .Fee,Pe kPerimeter Street Fee,Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. • * Please be aware that all mechanical units must be fully screened of view from public R.O.W.and residential properties. . ' ' - * • All fire lanes must meet Fire Department requirements. - * Denotes Informational Comment att: Right in/Right out driveway exhibit,Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Texas Commerce Bank Corgan&Associates, Inc. L:\WP-PILL/A,RI V191971146SP1.WPD 7T -4., • ' Articulation Evaluation No.! Case No. ZA 97-046 Date of Evaluation: 5/02/97 Elevations for Texas Commerce Bank,Lot 2, Block 2 of Village Center Phase 2 Received 4/11/97 Let. ont-facing: East Wallht.g18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 54 32 -41% Yes 54 32 -41% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 10 233%. Yes 3 4 33% Yes Min. artic. length 8 15 88% Yes 8 17 113% Yes Rear-facing West Wall ht. = 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 54 22 -59% Yes 54 32 -41% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 4 33% Yes Min. artic. length 6 19 217% Yes 8 17 113% Yes Right-facing: North Wall ht.= 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? R uired Provided Delta Oka ? Max.wall length 54 49 -9% Yes Min.artic. offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 7 133% Yes Min.artic. length 3 6 _ 100% Yes 'eft-facing: South Wall ht.= 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? R uired Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 54 52 -4% Yes Min. artic. offset 3 3 0% Yes 3 . 7 133% Yes Min.artic. length 13 ' 15 15% Yes C -7 = - 1 11111 These appendices are not considered a put of this orsTmancv and maybe revised or updated as necessary by the Director. APPENDIX 5 .11111(Hillii Right-in/Right-out Driveway Design(Limited Access) riii al as si iii 4 4 - iii 50' R MIN.' 50rR MIN. 18 r. \ • ill CURB ,� t�iii • - • • - • • MIN . :: . . . . .• : • till • SOLID WHITE LINE 1110 .. • . . C June 20,;1905 A - 5 . g 16018 'Z✓7oI'.rz•. 3sleautxa• y 37 • •I � Cli NV'ld �1IS x Il oin- i • L661 I i dV C.33N , , 1Ls i 'T,— •s ry'Liac C Y 001 p 3 i .1"._ I le a p•t • la: . _ e go i ill;III e? a W t r---" I 0il 1'f I I boa; �_e 1 1 anua aaluaD aSu i M - 1 1 ! 1 1 r 13,r II � Il.n� n� � R.�js ` NMI.' I M% . t 1 L ,,,1 {t i4___ 3; .i I I i "I ! 33 a !! .. I a. I ! I I r It 41 1; lit a 6rliv,ir,. �4W !iiii . $ v v a I ,I jinnili& €o, I r #,. .. „ .. _ ..r � I ON : '...' . -77-....2_!"---- I • " i • 1.;:: I I 1 • 1414111 IIII II II g. F. _,.,..____ li �� l $ � <raa:. .. I v , ...._,,,, , ; ,... 3 2,.:';' ..:...1 I I I 0 0 ,.- *':,; I • c) !! !Ii. 1/ .,,.*;..::*;;:•4'41.-* *:':';'.;:.:::: ill In".: — :*:ii;'''', I CO° - i 17-' cv A/ •^'� °�o il .: -' s •,.:•...;:. I Ci �C,.,; • is : ., �, a a,.�,� ., I •4 , }• air i. ` ' '. .G p,••••3 • a Off• 9 • • ::; �:. .,,' « . a.� i:6 SS99JY I I _ �1_ _ I - I d S (7ow.09) • 2 I.ra 9wiu N 111 _ ——-- ___I— ?IQ QOOM.LS.�A H 'N 4tl 431 S I —c 4 .a b rr• r 4ttGe _ T. ;3 1 _ t..•vM "-c:.•.v.: « �ef. s... y<••:yv �Ai. ..� <Lsi.'+f J {1J - •", ,86700 • „ ,:,,:,,\\ • ,‘,.._\,,s, .,\\..„,,,.\ ...„. ' ,,,,TY't.,,1* '''. .N. ..,,,,,,,,k\(,,*-.., „.s ••••....• ....•••..•••••.........••N::.:.:..,:.:.: .:- - ::::,f, .......,..N.,....:::. •\..,.........•• „• ,_ 0..A. . -1,, ,,..-..,,,•1 , \\...:,,,..::.\\\.,› •,,,,.\ \\\`'s, \ ‘Ni. \\ \ ''.:•:•:',.:.0:* (0004 \\ ..•:: ``, 3VI JWIQ71/78 /OEI \\\-\ :a••:•i... yi,.•''\ ; .k • ``1 - :.: \'''N\ ` ILL , . .._ . . ._ :, ••: :In \\ \` •:••••: , v= i•------- --- ---r.\ NI I I \ i W \ Q r- - • t ksi \• -\ \ b...i4W \ \ \s , 42, .„. :-:•:‘.1 `...--; •t -- — -k,•,.....\-...• ii _._miiiii ..±.\:\: 't::::kk. - _____._ 4......_____. 4,- W.." k : ______-_ry---tx,„„x, ..-•-•-,-:-:-:-:- A LJ Wry 13 1: .:.:.:SN 1 . ; U- 0 , CN , tarig-7 • .: .• , • I« ,J i. - klcsg. ._----._ :- , ,, .-----<-•-• .....:.....:.:!.. . 1. OA •\ \ lal4 rn --/-4---' •-•---- . .__ —... —ijai'gli *Zs ii *If . . __ _ . ......„:„.,... , _ , ...., :\ #ivA4 :,i7iv•\p . .:-7. :::..‘k\k. GQ N 0 \ �:••':: • evi.".„C° 1 W. ...Rel&k\Nwe.. 'sx. v.v..N.vi.\,,V,.----N- ' Atit ... ...-I . ...::' :4.‘ '*1*::':::::::....- .... -'-i...- .''.- ..:-. .-, •...0"..-..... , - . .--.1 Ei • • . ... • . :... • , k . ( „„ \ • IL., ' . K 14 . .i* • ' I. \ • \ 3 } \t�, V \4 ` / k`. \ \\ \\\� 3UL1 .L6 '. .:., �r-1 NleZ609L sexal'alel4inoS ��g8 $ e�e1y3nog Jslue3 eBellin aaaaWW03 11 n a�e14TnoS Sexal # 1 1 1 1 I IU a L661 TI eavC.33)i tab i iii sL AI Mi ` i 1 . I :: I II I I I ill• iii i = . ■ P II 'I I N t 1 i ji, III 1 4 i 1 I CI - 1 I ihr, i „ al I;; __. it IP • � • �. I 1 li' NIm ii-M • • I ii tr I °III MI ME . 1 illEriiJ # 'AIM P. _ .-,- N III I j i i I! (; asi��{d aalua;7 aSOIl!A >{tte� = 8 • _ �FG ! is 'I.xolt{ Ic�'I .3.t.i•3utuiu3 s .. 1 • 4 I I NdZd rJI�IIQd2ID sexay in a s L661. II Edtl C.338 ; ,f g 1 -Lb ° , j Y W ui r, a1 i O W Z®ga c U O N pp U D H .d O F O ~ O M Q Q 2 M F. N o O .G 1 3 W 14 i g. 'V. Y - s it % M'021 ML N k + UO i . , §aAUQ JalueD aSeim I I I 1P —"IR V ' )II'; "' . f. d rtr i� la 4 I 1ti is t.A 1 I. oimiTrillit.' If f 1 r ij t 11 ii771,F--.::::77-: - It relit C:71,,t/N /idea' IIaggi 6_iiii...),, __....j;4"-_,..-7." 110 Iil 7 4( ogre -6-40 SI i , ,,,,,,,,..„,...„ :.:_...„?.. ,_,..,. ... 41,,,, 'r,4„ / • fift _r „,i,•••A, 1., "Ail cts . ' • .. •• pv `y am!,, s riI•',„mV,1o.w.1,.ir„1r#11 W__o..__10. , m•.„n.11.14f�„...r10p1 . 'N 3 '" • ..,. •` • • •t. e 1 ym .... . ,/�// -.*/sip sro . . . • . : .. . .• .-• . •.-.' . ,f:'''' 4- , , •• •,. 11411Pge 1 MilIPPONI.I I I I I I In I lail&Iiir ti dishrir:0411, _..diiiiiiit le......°11 Mir,/1.. .... 3. ' . . - : -- - or : iii ilyi ji i 0 0+1' :‘•03 0 I..- Age/ Ii.Nkt, • ex ► g, ..... . Ei - _ _ LifigiatV ._ .. . I svl:w nu.:r....1.s.R:`.6: I • C Li (a 11 il . ii .. I' f n ®f L I II !I! I I III iIL, li ill X. l era. t; 1 1 if atl .. +. It Ili! 411.: Ai 1I4 • I1: 111 I IiG P1 < 2 I! un r. •j ILI'l 11 4 ■ a ---I Ili di i1 1. .-4 1--7:1.. C ,. 4 g.l. it-i-i IliM 7_ - Ili- City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 96-159 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-238 Rezoning /Tract 5A, portion of Tracts 5, 11A, and 11B Thomas Easter Survey,Abstract No. 474 STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of approximately 43.696 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and being Tracts 5, 5A, 11 A, and 11B. AMENDED REQUEST: The applicant has reduced his original zoning request to 29.51 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and being a portion of Tracts 5, 11 A, and 11B and all of Tract 5A. LOCATION: East side of Crooked Lane and approximately 560' south of the intersection East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and Crooked Lane. OWNER AND APPLICANT: Ken Smith CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District LAND USE CATEGORIES: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses) Because this property is located within the 75 LDN noise level contour of DFW International Airport, Residential development is not allowed. Industrial (may include the manufacturing,processing, packaging, assembly, storage, warehousing and/or distribution of products) Please note that the colored City Land Use Maps incorrectly show that a portion of this property is located in a Mixed Use category. NO. NOTICES.SENT:. Fifteen(15) (1st NOTIFICATION): RESPONSES: (1st NOTIFICATION): Five(5)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Pamela and Lowell Morrison, 710 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake, undecided. "1. My property drains into this meadow-how will this affect me? 2. Lighting -will there be bright lights shining in my windows all night? 3. � S- Traffic. Will trucks be driving by my house between 1709 Land 26? 4. Will the development be on city sewer?" • Carol and John Demlow, 1775 Sleepy Hollow, Southlake, opposed. "An adequate buffer is not being provided between existing residential and the area being considered for the proposed zoning change to "Light Industrial." • Barbara Jo Gordon, 2715 E. Southlake, Southlake, opposed. "The area is too close to residential areas with no buffer between." • Bobby Struempler, 700 Whispering Wood Circle, Southlake, opposed. "We are living in a residential environment now and do not wish to be mixed with an industrial district and all of its activities." • Iva Johnson, 720.Whispering Woods Circle, Southlake, opposed. "I am opposed to having this industrial district this close to me as we all have nice homes out here. I don't think this is a fair thing to do to us." Two (2) responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • Terry L. Wilkinson, President, Southlake Properties, Inc., in favor. • Mr. and Mrs. Louis Kaposta, disapprove. Resident states concerns with noise factors, heavier traffic, increased potential for crime, and quality of life. See attached letter. NO. NOTICES SENT: Six (6) (2nd NOTIFICATION): RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: (2nd NOTIFICATION): • Catherine Verburg, P.O. Box 487, Grapevine, TX 76099, in favor. One (1) response was received outside the 200' notification area: • Gary Fickes and John Dorety, Exchange Boulevard II Inc., 2875 Exchange Blvd., Southlake, in favor. "We...feel that Stonecrest Business Park would be an asset to our investment and a larger asset to the City of Southlake." See attached letter.- . P&Z ACTION: January 9, 1997; Approved (6-0)applicant's request to table until the January 23, 1997 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting. January 23, 1997; Public Hearing continued to February 6, 1997 due to Resolution 95-24. February 6, 1997; Approved(7-0) applicant's request to table until the March 6, 1997 Planning&Zoning Commission meeting. 7f`0 City of Southlake,Texas March 6, 1997; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table until the April 3, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. April 3, 1997; Approved(6-0) applicant's request to table until the April 17, 1997 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting. April 17, 1997; Motion to deny (3-2). COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 1997; Approved (6-1). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "I-1" Light Industrial District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff Due to the Commission's recommendation to deny, a super- majority vote(6 of 7) of the City Council will be required to approve this request. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\96CASES\96-159Z.WPD • - 3 ON 22 JANUARY 1997, DURING A SPIN 7 MEETING, MR. a9#i SMITH GAVE THOSE WHO ATTENDED, A PRESENTATION OF HIS PLAN TO RE=ZONE HIS 46 ACRES FROM AG TO I-I. AFTER THE MEETING, THE CONSENSUS AMONG THE ATTENDEES WAS THAT THEY DISAPPROVED OF HIS PLAN. THEY FELT THAT THIS IS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF THE OLD SAYING, "ONE MAN' S MEAT IS ANOTHER MAN' S POISON! " THE CHANGE,, IF APPROVED, WOULD BE GREAT FOR MR. SMITH AND, NO DOUBT, MAKE HIM WEALTHY, BUT FOR THE OTHER RESIDENTS ALONG CROOKED LANE, IT WOULD CREATE ANOTHER "THERE GOES THE NEIGHBORHOOD SITUATION! " ALTHOUGH WE SUFFERED THROUGH PREVIOUS MEETINGS AWAITING OUR TURN TO BE HEARD, WE WERE ALSO FORTUNATE TO HEAR MOST OF THE SPEAKERS SAY THAT THEY WERE AGAINST INCREASING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. MOST RESIDENTS RELOCATED HERE BECAUSE THEY WERE ABLE TO FIND A WONDERFUL CHANGE FROM THE HECTIC PRESSURES OF CITY LIFE. HERE, THEY FOUND PEACE AND QUIET AND LOTS OF NATURAL BEAUTY TO APPRECIATE. NOW, WE, LIKE THEM, ARE BEING ASKED TO REVERT TO LIVING THE TYPE OF LIFE WE MOVED AWAY FROM. WE DON' T WANT THAT TO HAPPEN! WE FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THE REQUEST THAT MR. SMITH DESIRES WILL RESULT IN A COMPLETELY UNSATISFACTORY AND UNWANTED CHANGE OF LIFE FOR ALL CONCERNED. . THIS IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE WILL ALL BE SUB- JECTED TO GREATER NOISE FACTORS. . .MUCH, MUCH HEAVIER TRAFFIC DENSITY AND ENSUING PROBLEMS, INCREASING POTENTIAL FOR CRIME, ETC. , ETC. CONSEQUENTLY, WE DISAPPROVE OF MR. SMITH' S REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN . ZONING. MANY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS ASKED THAT THE "QUALITY OF LIFE" BE MAIN- TAINED IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. ALTHOUGH WE ARE FEWER IN NUMBERS THAN RESIDENTS FROM TIMARRON, ETC. , WE FEEL THAT WE SHOULD ALSO BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THE SAME "QUALITY OF LIFE" WE ARE ENJOYING AT THIS 71— - REC'D FEB 061997 (), a�� , ;E 2 SMITH "ZONING" REQUEST PG. 2 1/27/97 TIME. MR. SMITH CLAIMS THAT "AIRCRAFT NOISE" IS THE MAJOR FACTOR IN HIS REQUEST FOR CHANGE. HOWEVER, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT HE ORIGINALLY PERSUADED THE CITY, OVER THEIR OBJECTIONS, TO PERMIT HIM TO BUILD HIS LOVELY HOME IN THE AIRCRAFT NOISE CORRIDOR. FINALLY, MR. SMITH' S REQUEST IS NOT "SITE SPECIFIC. " THERE- FORE, HOW CAN WE APPROVE A PLAN THAT IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION IN THE FUTURE, ALL DEPENDENT UPON MR. SMITH' S DESIRES? WE WANT TO WORK WITH MR. SMITH, AND FEEL THAT IF HE WOULD RETAIN THE TEN ACRES FRONTING CROOKED LANE AS "AG, " THAT WE COULD POSSIBLY APPROVE HIS REZONING OF THE REMAINING 36 ACRES FOR I-1 , SUBJECT TO BEING "SITE SPECIFIC. " • C 73 G . • EXCHANGE BOULEVARD II, INC. 2875 EXCHANGE BOULEVARD SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 April 3, 1997 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 No. Carroll Rd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Stonecrest Business Park Exchange Blvd. II, Inc. is in support of the proposed zoning of the Stonecrest Business Park, as PP P an office/industrial park(I-1, 0-1). The Master Plan and Land Use Map has always designated the area for industrial use because it falls directly under the DFW Airport runway noise cone"C'' (most intense). We own (4) office/warehouse buildings on Exchange Blvd. that are adjacent to this project (2845, 2855, 2865 and 2875 Exchange) and feel that Stonecrest Business Park would be an asset to our investment and a larger asset to the City of Southlake. • • 00 Gary Ickes Jo• D rely L REC� APR 08 1997 (sr CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-238 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 29.51 ACRES SITUATED IN THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474, BEING TRACT 5A, AND A PORTION OF TRACTS 5, 11 A, AND 11 B AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. REQUESTED ZONING: WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to' amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals'and.. •. . .:- general welfare, airin accordance with a:comprehensive plait;and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-238.WPD Page 1 i �S-� (Br the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts-of land are needed,:are called for, and-are in the best interes't of the Public-at large,.th .citjzen of the-city,o':Soutlilake, • . Texas; and helps•promote the general health,safety and welfate of the'commirn ty,•'. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-238.WPD Page 2 L Being a 29.51 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being Tract 5A, and a portion of Tracts 5, 11 A, and 11B, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "I-1" Light Industrial District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable L consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section:' ,. .Any-pe• rson; firm.or corporation:who violates, disobeys;omits,neglects Of. .,.. . • . . refuses.to co•mply with or who'resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall. be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. :Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances Laffecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-238.WPD Page 3 (me until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: C CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. . MAYOR C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-238.WPD Page 4 � �— Cie ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY C C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-238.WPD Page 5 EXHIBIT"A" BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron pin found at a fence corner at the Southeast corner of the tract i4 Volume 10433,Page 2287 above referenced,said point being the Southwest corner of Cmmerce Business Park to the city of Southlake,as shown in a plat of record in Volumaf 388-204,Page 48,Plat Records,Tarrant County,Tex2.,and in the North line of Heritage Industrial Park Addition; THENCE West(Base bearing recorded Volume 6282,Page 671), 839.70 feet to the Southwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds West 774.65 feet to a point; THENCE North 09 degrees 23 minutes 57 seconds East 50.20 feet to a point; THENCK North 70 degrees 58 minutes 06 seconds East 305.51 feet to the Northwest corner of the herein described tract, said point being in the West line of the tract described in Volumtf 6282,Page 671, above referenced; THENCE North 52 degrees 29 minutes 44 seconds East departing said West line, Cie 1019.19 feet to a point; THENCE North 37 degrees 21 minutes 11 seconds West 39.71 feet to a point; THENCE North 50 degrees 18 minutes 50 seconds East,424.73 feet to the Northeast corner of the herein:described tract,said point being in the East line of the tract in Volume 9755,Page 1297,above referenced; THENCE South 00 degrees 39 minutes 35 seconds East,362.73 feet with the East line of the last referenced tract and the West line of a tract described in a Deed of Record in Volume 6774,Page 752,D.R.T.CO.,,TX.,to a 1 inch pipe found at the Southwest corner of the last referenced tract,said point being the'Northwest corner of said Commerce Business Park; ' t THENCE South 00 degrees 18 minutes.59 seconds East 1,484.45 feet along the West line of said Commerce Business Park and along the East line of the tract in Volume 9755; Page 1297 and Volume 10433,Page 2287,above referenced to the POINT OF - BEGINNING and containing 29.51 acres. C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-238.W PD Page 6 1 S - 1, • • '�� II - 1St,B Y.1f -x,� i] aT ---sT�c YTr-rr.-...-_ . : .� 5431: , .A'j J M � 'l rr. 5. 6F :'-. ICE aA3 �� 5.4 rI � = 1 �i11 ! I1 moio sA. snA, MS� r�P� r'P€L=:!\M�i �di, Ap9 a- +.'`. I. 0 11 A I1 J i< 1—..•.a i. , '^'� M 291 2911 2ESD 197 2BI1 12A.2B6 RN - \ .' i an.L,N•'Q 282 28 293 2B9 2BS 21310 294 `j�Q ' �I' 1i •{ ` glib TT- 2D 2G x 2E T 2R 2f 2.1 • 2P 1• T Vr•w •` r S' �� L. : Ill -193 2R l Q 2E 20 2R 2R •� • "EN c i MIN _ 5 ._.Y ooD�K U --v.'--F_ s ._ 582 582D-, =G^..Ttttt"�` 2A2 _ �ND1Nr 2FIA AP 1 _ �62C a YVVG t - ` ._._.J SB2C 5 i i._ _ALB_-_ - 2A18•• ® l 18 182 1 /A, _ AMHEY NORTH �� ©© B A-458 =mph,P1- WEST PKWY EAST 1 IA' �� lip r24 _ w N = - E� i i Ausnl PUCE •1 .�Q GRp`f ADDrjO �'i�383 '�,- i .E MA�� --' �` ! : I > t 2a1`'�lr � 1tAST So °AKE B1w. ,4 3 g --. i r--- r i • _�` '-T _� m i 1 - 1 �o �� T•l� HIGHWAY 2 28 1B2A 1B2 18 l ----1--------1 �...... `3� a 1828 `? LP( 1 I. 1 r- �I i i i i i i i j i i %i��/�'i - � � 15 A. CJo0�- 4 �.RR r W!a"�„ A i 3 'L v%- g09 Pam ihi, 1 r u 2A3 2A2A 2A1A �4:%aA1A r V y�L 34 2 2A18 � ' (�� ®._.—,_.-_-,-.-•••t•- 1v wi:i.;., ....._•_ -•-•,/;,. ; i IC 1 jAlrt 7At 2 -in '--- Lf\Y 12.09 k a .--- _ 1i,. 11A ne I 4-[1�y M_ -T----- IIf • ^ "ram f f . 1 I i 04E1 ,plii, ,_.. S 41----------- GOP ; ti "; `' KK 1ND4 Ill' 611 I I i 1 •• w i - MI i , 1 m• Q 11D1 - i ' �R t 611t r(( ` 3 I ! 1 ' i a mr i i 11D5A1 11Da r--1 r----, 363 3 1 GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT • O (• . 3 k , 6.ISk -____-__-_.. I 1 .mil. iH:. .� 1 , i r- ,.. N IQrG , 681 LA"�---r- .`%1. to R✓ ` r M B 0 f✓ 555 6c•60 •6E` _B RK 1 ;; �DD • 61 k -r �1. - t� " • 1 CIA M. ow— R a 0n1� ` \ lA 0\0". a 1 O k Ask •1 1 i . ` i 1 Ge -i81A 112311111:311 • �e TRAC • T MAP J=-- - ,�c�,u mate tsa k j , tir ;187 "'V•J }w4t1s '+,H INC r.1 '� �T^[7 1%il 181 re tt ®=szji use uta INC F1NA�►DN el 1- . •ti 4,. �rrau mat CZ. ICA mu ADD ,A .-Ire 'i '7 r c. q (1-15q _IIII,,_41 10.S MO 78 ��y tF2 NO 1750UV ,t City of Southlake,Texas (11)11"" STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-028 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-239 Rezoning/a portion of Tracts 5, 11A, and 11B Thomas Easter Survey/Abstract No. 474 STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of approximately 8.55 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey,Abstract No. 474,being a portion of Tracts 5, 11A, and 11B. LOCATION: East side of Crooked Lane and approximately 560' south of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and Crooked Lane. OWNER/APPLICANT: Ken Smith CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District LAND USE CATEGORIES: Low Density Residential (may include limited low intensity office and/or retail uses)Because this property is located within the 75 LDN noise level contour of DFW International Airport, Residential development is not allowed. Industrial (may include the manufacturing, processing, packaging, assembly, storage,warehousing and/or distribution of products) Please note that the colored City Land Use Maps incorrectly show that a portion of this property is located in a Mixed Use category. NO.NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) (FIRST NOTIFICATION): RESPONSES: One (1)response was received within the 200' notification area: (FIRST NOTIFICATION): • Southlake Market Loop LC, P.O. Box 2104, Grapevine, TX 76092, in favor. "We feel that this is the best use of the land, because of the air traffic overhead it does not seem well suited for residential." See attached letter. fie' ) City of Southlake,Texas Two (2)responses were received outside the 200 notification area: • Johnny L. & Edna Beech, 701 Whispering Woods Circle, Southlake, in favor. "We feel that Mr. Smith has done an exceptional job in planning this Business Park. This property is located in the noise cone of DFW Airport, therefore it is limited as to how it can be developed." See attached letter. • Larry and Margie Rideout, 2737 Crooked Lane, Southlake, in favor. "(We)feel that through his plan, he has done an excellent job of incorporating an office environment into a residential community." See attached letter. NOTIFICATION (2nd NOTIFICATION): Six(6) RESPONSES (2nd NOTIFICATION): Two (2)responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • Southlake Market Loop L.C., P.O. Box 794, Colleyville, TX 76034, in favor. "We fell that this is the best use of the land, because of the air traffic overhead it does not seem well suited for residential." See attached letter. • Gary Fickes and John Dorety, Exchange Boulevard II Inc., 2875 Exchange Blvd., Southlake, in favor. "We...feel that Stonecrest Business Park would be an asset to our investment and a larger asset to the City of Southlake." See attached letter. • Catherine Jurgensen, 4138 Willow Grove Rd, Dallas, Texas 75220, in favor. "Because of the noise from the airport, I feel that some type of commercial or business zoning is appropriate." P&Z ACTION: April 3, 1997; Approved (6-0) applicant's request to table until the e April 17, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. April 17, 1997; Approved(5-0). COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 1997; Approved(7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "0-1" Office District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-o28Z.WPD IL - � • ( lltlll •H, • , , H , . , M • A • R • K • E • T • P • L • A • C • E Southlake Market Loop L.C. March 26, 1947 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Reference No. : ZA 97-028 Dear Sir / Madam: We are in favor of all of Mr. Ken Smith's 43 acres being changed to I-1 and/or 0-1 zoning. We feel that this is the best use of the land, because of the air traffic overhead it does not seem well suited for residential. kiwi Our decisions are based on the fact that the business park to the East side and the new project to the South side (by Trammell Crow) are already zoned this way. In the near future, all land South and West to Kimball and Continental will most likely be zoned as industrial property. Most of the property North of the project is currently zoned commercial on the city plans. We hope that our comments will assist you in considering Mr. Smith's request. Please let me know if you have further questions. Sincerely, 4, Bob Gammon RJG/dw RE 'ikkR 2 61997 co �79 P. O. Box 794 • Co Ileyville, Tex March 27, 1997 REGO MAR 2 7 1997 Planning &Zoning Department CITY Off SOUTHLAKE 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Ref: Stonecrest Business Park Southlake, TX Ken Smith, Developer To Whom It May Concern: We have reviewed the proposed plans for the Stonecrest Business Park to be developed by Ken Smith. We feel that Mr. Smith has done an exceptional job in planning this Business Park. This property is located in the noise cone of DFW Airport; therefore, it is limited as to how it can be developed. We believe he has tried to develop the areas which join the residential properties in such a way that the current property owners would be satisfied that their property value would not be decreased. We must point out that our property does not join this proposed business park, however, we would be affected by any additional traffic in the area. We still are not opposed to the development of this property as proposed in the plans dated March 10, 1997. Sincerely, g-e-e-d(_/ 6:Gen("L, e Johnny L. & Edna E. Beech 701 Whispering Woods Circle Southlake, TX 76092 817/ 488-6841 -Pt �� ' City of Southl k n�� DC� � � 1O0� a e �[}�U !,!r`^� ^^ ' '� , ' Zoning Commission ~ Dear Sirs: My husband and I have been residents at 2737 Crooked Lane for the past 12 years. We have reviewed the proposed office complex plan designed by our neighbor Ken Smith and feel that through his plan, he has done an excellent job of incorporating an office environment into a residential community. In his design, he has assured us that a "country" atmosphere will continue to exist b; the planting of trees to screen the buildings and that truck access will be to the south of homes and not on Crooked lane. , Our once quiet neighborhood has severely been disrupted by the noise of landing airplanes and the widening of 1709. I do not feel that an office complex will create additional disruption to our lifestyle that could possibly compare to the airport noise or danger to us that has already been imposed upon us by the 170� road expansion. If Mr . Smith insures proper and adequate upkeep and security related to the complex , we do not in any way oppose his plans. Sincerely, Lary and Margie Rideout � ` EXCHANGE BOULEVARD II, INC. 2875 EXCHANGE BOULEVARD SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 April 3, 1997 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 No. Carroll Rd. • Southiake, Texas 76092 Re: Stonecrest Business Park Exchange Blvd. g 1 d. II, Inc. is in support of the proposed zoning of the Stonecrest Business Park, as an office/industriai park(I-1, 0-1). The Master Plan and Land Use Map has always designated the area for industrial use because it falls directly under the DFW Airport runway noise cone"C" (most intense). We own (4) office/warehouse buildings on Exchange Blvd. that are adjacent to this project (2845, 2855, 2865 and 2875 Exchange) and feel that Stonecrest Business Park would be an asset to our investment and a larger asset to the City of Southlake. 00 Gary Ickes Jo• D b rety C RECD APR 0 8 1997 !. t.L ' J, 1,.A_,, ,,, xr, MP --,•1 rtiTifixy?tr-rTr. .r.rr---. . I SDI ©�©�•"� 510409 pp r _r SA. :.. r��, ;31i373F'�TI ,�1 A _ • -r- l' 10 MA3-•LEI,'•HAb l © amm r"�� \ : ,��-- �' • i 7�'' =ow N 20 2135 1 ° ��` -fir f. . �,�1► . �'r '' Cc IMINiipktil lilighl 4 14-- /5-- rteg/IV x al m x 20 2M 214 . V io1 imilig . ce'._Y - �p�,KE _ 11tm`ex" CO 2Az 1HD1Nr 2A1A Ail ^- AGR 1 ! 5828 5132A _ 2A18 ,7..,1.-111 ��-,,_�,MAa L ASTER MR. ® 18 Idz a s NORTH �© stiw+Er A-"° MEM ��EST PKWY a'ST ' �lft,;DE '' y R• RAR a i • fA '' . e ' , ...„,..,, i,.., � ^I114 AD 1riONI ''a' MAfl`Y; L , � '`�'`- • n.om L 2E5 .-----= �4�� .�Alki MI _"�� 182A 182 4 I] �. I �_J_4--- 1-------1 - k.7-: u,,lrL. _ .,- 1B2B I I I I1 1 1 1 1 V , 50 • s VA.. RRV .4., i``A i , _ . �. B `I 2E • Rf9 2A3A '•i.` A'' 1 jr-i y �� — IBI 2A2 11,, �v ;; ! ", V O- ill m ?A 2A2A, ' _i 6AIA1 8 v �.5, = 2 2AIA ;y �� 3 it 2A1B J --� r 331 44 s ilk zA 1. 0s i ; - ` lc I �_r _ ( '9 S7 I 1 '\ U' ©3a �../\\ ''ram p 1209 A< `^� Y sill G 1 -- I t4\ r---- ID --- v • i gli* 114, • ...._......_L 3A •to i' Z< 0 ''''A` i i fs;uric ,/G A-474 I I L —�a .V ' to 30 44 . . .• i I ' E 60 4AI ---I-f-ri" cif'jI .) _�.';— ARK -- OP 4.14 1 i 1 11D1 -- i 1 1 6Bt 5NO: I f m 40 ! i -.AZ I 8 i ®1 ! i 1 I i ._ ____-1 1 1105A1 ItD4 i i i i 1-1 ,.I 0 ; !1 38 3 ' GRAPEVINE an' u r .I 3 A A c 6.15 Ac ' / 1 .1. F• 1.55 4 4 r I 6CGgfg---4" e--- . . 6B1 60 sE B�S1N�' ___- 1. �� EEN `1?ARK 4 r rid PARK pARK 11:\ MFJap 61 Ac 1151R L , , IleriNiT701/.T1111111\ 1Np 1 t i ,i. . , i i i \\ I i .. I. McD®1uALD,-. 4A le4l ® Q 1B1A \\. f 1 4 TRACT MAP . j_ ie.l ,Mg ,eec2 15.6 Ac a4A�E = Iea I - tB6x 181 K 1 4 MI .I2 I 1 ` —A 11S0 eI. f1NActON 8 I Isµ5 EMI ma Mal tB661ADP I'ti .;ice !a% i 4A A ` lJ i i, 3 • 183 1819 4A2 N� PC�IOUV Mil O/]✓1 NOAD _• 1 48 f'N'{ - ..,\ G RY[Yi• Si .4-13.27 �j •ja NI I I I ... -' .005 0 TR 2A1C AG TR zA tl 1.237 • ts25/� 1 E aIIIIIIIIIIIIIIraall TR 2A B GORDON TR 2A1 1: 6.79 AC I 2.493 0 R r Q 5° Tyr (u(c( .189 - ./ GQQ TR2 J. DEMLOW •744 AC .C.JURGENSEN 1 AG TR 11 R. WILLIAMS/ ' 5.93 AC S. PRITCHETT • • / /� • (� TR • !8 C 7 AC • 1 CJJ \......- AG E.WHITE T. ow/EA S 7 toAC 1 �1` / � 1 TR 11E . 6 R. BACA. -�' ` ` '1'R Y i C \ 1 .' / TR 5A • a 7SF-1 A J 16.46 AC •,C� CIIM to 9 p TR 5 1 503 AC �_ t Ila Q� i 0 ci 10 1.891 o Z....! I w N TR 1101 I 100° 2.5 AC 11 1 ••- EX( TR 1104 - 2.049 0 . 5 22 22 " • '�'� � ��.��• -��..�� 11 1 I 1i_" — +4_ �-(; ADJACENT OWNERS TAIALGAAPE"ENE (3 AND ZONING �S 3 tv...-- ® 1-o B Mc- cY3 SPIN#7 DARRELL FAGLIE c. S 1pt iA "�l 1 I / I. QIN° r . 06/26/96 ice$ qkl-PS; 0 -I it CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-239 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 8.55 ACRES SITUATED IN THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474, BEING A PORTION OF TRACTS 5, 11 A, AND 11 B AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; (re PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. REQUESTED ZONING: WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person (b.., or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-239.WPD Page 1 1 K -1 thikw changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of pcing as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those C who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, Cis hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-239.WPD Page 2 t I I 0 Being a 8.55 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tracts 5, 11 A, and 11 B, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "0-1" Office District. Section . That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of S iuthlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development C of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-239.WPD Page 3 1 I • until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance rovides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisionsi then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper ow.time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: (re CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-239.W PD Page 4 I' Cie ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: • APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-239.WPD Page 5 13 • . EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at a railroad rail found at a fence corner for the Northeast corner of the tract descbed in Volume 9755,Page 1297,above referenced,said point being the Southeast corner of a tract of land described in a Deed of Record in Volume 4858,Page 830,D.R.T.CO.,TX.; THENCE South'fau degrees 39 minutes 35 seconds East 124.36 feet with a!i Easterly line of the last referenced tract and the West line of a tract described in a Deed of Record in Volume 6774,Page 752,D.RT.CO.,TX. to the Southeast corner of the herein described tract; . THENCE South 50 degrees 18 minutes 50 seconds West departing said Easterly line 424.75 felt to a point; THENCE South 37degrees 21 minutes 11 seconds East 39.77 feet to a point; THENCE South 52 degrees 29 minutes 44 seconds West 1,019.19 feet to the Southwest corner of the herein described tract, said point being in the West line of the tract described in Volume 6272,Page 671, above referenced; THENCE North 00 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds West along the West line of the last ( Tco1x referent tract and the East line of a tract described in Deed in Volume 9499,Page 760, ,315.40 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin set in the Southerlyline of Crooked Lane; THENCE North 48 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East 63.70 feet to an 1/2 ironpin set at the mostNortherly Northwest corner of a tract described in Volume 6282,Page 671, above referenced, said point being in the South line of a tract described in Volume 9755, Page 1297, above referenced; THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds West 10.00 feet along of the last referenced tract to a 1/2 inch iron pin set at the most Westerly • corner of same; ` ONCE North along the Westerly line of the last referenced tract Easterly lie of Crooked Lane the following: North 42 degrees and the approximate East 39.33 feet,North 53 degreesg 24 minutes 28 seconds t , 56 minutes 00 seconds East 292.00 feet,North 55 degrees 11 minutes 00 seconds East 120.00 feet,North 48 degrees 21 minutes 00 seconds East 75.00 feet,North 42 degrees 28 minutes 04 seconds East 76.33 feet,North 30 degrees 25 minutes 00 seconds East 250.00 feet and North 39 degrees seconds East 102.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin set for the Northwest scorn oft the last reference tract; THENCE 87 degrees 05 minutes 25 seconds East 413.0 feet with the Northerly line of Ost referenced tract and the general courses of an old fence line to the POINT OF INNING and containing 8. 55 acres. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-239.WPD Page 6 City of South lake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-047 PROJECT: First Reading/Ordinance No. 480-244 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Commerce Square STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as 7.22 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 3A. LOCATION: South of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709)and immediately east of Crooked Lane. OWNER: Southlake Properties, Inc. APPLICANT: Terry Wilkinson CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with"0-1" Office District, (re "B-1" Business Service Park District, and limited "I-1" Light Industrial uses REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District and limited "I-1" Light Industrial District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten (10) RESPONSES: Three (3) responses were received within the 200' notification area: - • Carl and Madge Smith, 13212 Glad Acres Dr., Dallas, TX 75234, in favor. "Continue growth of area." • Ken Smith, PO Box 3, Grapevine, TX, in favor. • Catherine Jurgensen, 4138 Willow Grove Rd, Dallas, TX, in favor. P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved (7-0) to continue Public Hearing to the May 15, 1997 Planning& Zoning Commission meeting. oA - City of Southlake,Texas May 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to the Concept Plan Review No. 1 dated May 2, 1997 amended as follows: 1) delete item# 2a (driveway spacing from Crooked Lane) 2) delete item#2b (driveway spacing from Commerce Street) 3) delete item# 2c (spacing between driveways) 4) delete item# 2d (minimum required throat depth) 5) amend item#3a to eliminate the 10' Fl Bufferyard required along the interior west line of Lot 2, but relocate the required plantings adjacent to F.M. 1709. 6) Eliminate the following C-2 uses as permitted under Ordinance 480-U, Section 21.2: 21. Filling stations or service stations, operating with or without a convenience store. 24. Frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping. 7) Eliminate the following C-1 uses as permitted under Ordinance 480-U, Section 20.2a: 5. Gasoline Filling stations that operate in conjunction with a small convenience store. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all items in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated.May 2, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 16, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-047ZC.WPD L A.�E•_"lJ 1E, �� 5 ♦ �_ , ili 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ram - ----- i1 5AI ! .5O 5CI / it t� _9ti `.-, U �j • 1 ��✓ 4 2J 2G 502 ! K0_n .•�+ten=. •�.'-...\`. t f ..rt.{`I11.fli A' 8.75 At 5D21 , ,-1_ . 56ic 5C11 .Sc1J 8V' 8p BE IA �,!. I`I 5D2B 93184 / • ✓",� to/. ♦ � . • Lir fi>� U4 8.75 At Spa r / �l '-5C1c2 eR r t_ .•l^ Y ��1 1 C i �NLON 5A2 5D4 i ( -' w ® .117.,; DOyI op 2 .< _ ... 5D '• i`^SC16 '�<, as eo evnA _ -*' Jhi i441f F. - — iiin -...,\ SC18 SCl � a 87 8W : 6it, -1 N1 111. 00 5A3 44© _.1,. il t 3B� „..SD1 ir" _ sm� 1rJTIT'F�11 E,1:00,14 . � 5 �'DD F ar 4-4 i . 1 y'. _, } i _ '5A4A yN 2D 2G 2C 2L 295 2F 1p2J 284 '� �.I - t f' .,._ 2P 1 f i \ "{i'•i* • ran. . 58Y eir .i 3A2- 3A1 -f i \ .:nay...--� i I r285 ,A�� ,`N }� cu.u:.eo:nvM.vi \ ` -��y't ��PAL12K ® 2E 20 2R 2N �• i JIF1vto1 • A / 1 i E �, - i - • 58,E .�(� �AD"]J• 54 -_- --i _. _- �2 �� 6+Y 2A2 - INDIN _ 2A1A I ff f i 582C 3 �j Il ._._� A6 ✓=_. ^ 2/�� y�2�y 2AIB • i 5828 582A �Y.rtr.- �r!J�rv'n+l fib E A II ( IN ! -81 183 18 182 1 }A, • .IEY A-458 E B �,I D C 3C 3C1 1 . IA 2E9C RTr 11 NORTHWEST PKWY EAST . •� RI rr 2E129 Vt < �,�p'Nr' �' RA ___ __ i 2E �� • gyp,,•E gli FAR :Vol 'FIELD i i AVSTN race 1. 1.4411111q11 WOnN - �� .1 r ` Dv t 44'3B3 a 1 1�• . i �. r, t[rom iu�[ 2E5�1� cp.r� �.-._._._._.i._._._._._: EDEAST SOUIHUKE Blom. S 83A • I I 4 HIGHWAY , r� 382 I 1 �.,,.• , 1.. --rr- i i I (��( 2 28 I82A 182 J1B i E 1 , 1E2 J , I ! i ! ! ! i /� r ! �. 1828 • g0Q •R,�q • .<�,: • p A _- B 181 I .RC.�'- 2A3A 2A2��irry1, Sat 4• i/6AtA! •' c 11 m 2A 2A3 2A2A ''� 1 .: LG� : 2 1At8 b / i i� sI• wAu sr 3Ac ® •+ i q 2A t , ' __ ''1__,, 3D 12.09 Ac • IL. I I A 118 7.----- f; �w '• mai ......, I �� o� 4: 5 5A I 1 1- D , \1.-- 13.6 Ac , i I I •45- N6 _ ,� --'�'—'— :— iii —0 . AND 64: 6G 4A1 -'-'-1-' -r'' 1 ;i R i 3 K i1 R 4A4 1 i 1 m•� 1101 i / I ! 6K� 6K1 �N' i 1 m 1 j 1 I •1 ' 1, 1 , 1104 1 i I 1 r1 _ 1105AI __ (.7 • 383 3 1 GRAPEVINE CITY OMIT ' 1 [-� i. 3 6.15 Ac ..-._._._._._.-_.- I 1, INJlUSIBIl1 BI YVS) N ` Eys ENS B050 68 681 ._._._._ -P RK 4 r fw PAR 6E 8051NE� ._._._._. .��.CsR0�.. 61 Ac U1 R�'L _. PARK i ‘;l Mf�'D IND 5 � „ �R111t,f1. 6F 1._!-'r-7--- TRACT MAP 55-0 „"..(61..1 i 1 I • l I ! i i -- - i , i ! 1 Q N �' i -- [��1 - • IBM iBIK} IBM I81A , ____ _-- ! - I ---� :I( IBICE _ tBAP 'Bw-c7A IBI¢ 181OA IB6CI A `tF'�u R ' ; ,BIOC 1';I"{1!. .? 15.6 Ac i �r 28 •. IB�O IBNIr t 1.-__ 3 @ 6.406 @ TRACT 6A1 5.263 AC 1.61 AC • TR 6A 1A 26311.° 6 0 V/ TR 3B1 ACT 6A .054 @ . .005 @ TR 2A1C ----------------------- 1.237 @ • _____ E SOUTHLAKE c BLVD dm TR.3A2 0 1' .766 @ TR 2A1 ' 00 •598 @ %%t 2.493 @ r ( L5 •58 AC G T `j� I0 ^(`' .361 AC 2 (--) 0 TR 11A TR 118 -. 4444/1. . 7 AC 3.857 AC ' . .- .1 4- - .(hime . . • IN 4 3 • 4 • ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING FOR ZA97-047 01-May-97 4 5 6 # Owner Name Zoning 01 CECIL YATES SF-1A I— 5 02 STATE OF TEXAS I1 CL (, c 03 JOE&IZAK GREGORY .11 0 04 JAMES&DIANE STACY S-P-I J Q • 1 05 JAMES&DIANE STACY I1 F- ) F n K 06 RANDY PACK 11 Q N 3 3 14 ® S J �/ 07 KENNETH SMITH AG �ri ° 0 CATHERINE JURGENSEN AG Q 1/ ~ 6 CATHERINE JURGENSEN AG �u JOHN&CAROL DEMLOW AG 1- 11 STATE OF TEXAS AG �� 12 SHIRLEY MCCARTY 11 �MM _n�2 «, 13 CARL&MADGE SMITH AG G 14 CARL&MADGE SMITH SF-1A 15 STATE OF TEXAS AG SPIN #7 DARRELL FAGLIE i I , 1 8A -t{- S- bg 1 (ow 0 aura a tnr s I Pe • ClIasIa am.,mat . 0 1 a, r rm� ____ _ __ v...ww.;N 1C}I (I •- 11 ;` r0 • col • _ / g �._ • ti!ii\ 4 E9 LI IIIIlI 1< l'. b3 I — Y - 1 j I , 17 JD Ip a99€ 4" a M j 0 1 Lamson )_ 1 d 0 L 1 'VI < (4:0:•:, -II Y I t _ _ _ — I Ii1c--I 1 'v A 0 0 0 \ @6 m • 6 7 ��\1---{ _ __ CI '111 . 1101 I I I __ } & — ../ a(coma.__. 1gRr' e _ �'• A; If It fit Id leS SOU s • WCS BLPp. (P.m. 1709) 4/ 9 gphi 1111:EI ,ff��f Iap f +'milll11;1.liittJiiiiib'4i'Rihj1. :ft. ..q, .,..s . !,10 i Imo_ i l 4 b S e 0 I R S R I eo..a.r..a..row,-. :eww.o weaves .a.�. a_o:vavv "` m"- EI .Raooaaao:a<aasa oaaa. !11 g. k.$ COMMERCE SQUARE ,,,a� - 'co Ae . I�. 7.22 ACRES ` gt a HOMAS EASTER SURVEY'. _ •mmi ; E ASST. 474 . ,.«-aa.aaAY SOUTHIA1 . TEXAS 1 - FEB 12 '�96 I' • City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No:ZA 97-047 Review No: Two Date of Review: 5/16/97 Project Name: Concept Plan-S-P-2 Zoning Request for Commerce Square being 7.22 Acres located in the Thomas Easter Survey,Abstract No.474 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Terry Wilkinson. Southlake Properties,Inc. Callahan&Associates 930 Parkview Lane p.O. Box 15577 Southlake.Texas 76092 Ft. Worth.Texas 76119 Phone: (817) 329-4599 Phone:(817)478-1765 Fax: (817)488-2420 Fax: (817) 561-2544 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. * This review is based on the "C-2" Zoning District Regulations for proposed Lot 1 and the "I-1" Zoning District Regulations for proposed Lot 2 according to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No.480,as amended . Provide driveways in accordance with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. The proposed driveways intersecting F.M. 1709 do not meet the minimum requirements as follows: a. The west driveway centerline is less than 500'from the east R.O.W. line of Crooked Lane.An approximate 200' spacing is shown. (P&Z Action 4/15/97: delete) b. The existing east driveway centerline is less than 500'from the west R.O.W.line of Commerce Street. An approximate 400' spacing is shown. Please note that this driveway is existing. However, the Driveway Ordinance requires that existing driveways must be brought into compliance when the trip rate is increased by a development. (P&ZAction 4/15/97: delete) c. The spacing between the two driveways is less than required 500'for full access driveways. A spacing of 250'is permitted if one driveway is limited to right in/right out only.The spacing shown is approximately 225'. (P&ZAction 4/15/97: delete) d. Based on the estimated parking requirements,the minimum driveway throat depth for traffic • stacking is 75'.The provided stacking depth is approximately 50'. Please be aware that throat depth is measured from the R.O.W. line to the point of tangency with the curb return for the interior drive lane. (P&ZAction 4/15/97: delete) e. Label the"Access Easement"along the east driveway as"Common Access Easement". City of Southlake,Texas 2. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards: a. A 10'Fl Bufferyard is required along the west lot line of Lot 2 adjacent to Lot 1.(P&ZAction 4/15/97: eliminate but relocate the required plantings adjacent to F.M. 1709.) b. Show the 10'F1 Bufferyard along the north lot line of Lot 2 adjacent to Lot 1 with a dashed line. 3. Label the owner's name for adjacent Commerce Business Park lots. 4. Show and label the type and height of all proposed screening. P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved (7-0) to continue Public Hearing to the May 15, 1997 Planning&Zoning Commission meeting. May 15, 1997,•Approved (7-0) subject to the Concept Plan Review No. 1 dated May 2, 1997 amended cis follows: 1) delete item #2a (driveway spacing from Crooked Lane) • 2) delete item #2b (driveway spacing from Commerce Street) 3) delete item #2c (spacing between driveways) 4) delete item #2d (minimum required throat depth) 5) amend item #3a to eliminate the 10' Fl Bufferyard required along the interior west line of Lot 2, but relocate the required plantings adjacent to F.M. 1709. 6) Eliminate the following C-2 uses as permitted under Ordinance 480-U, Section 21.2: • 21. Filling stations .or service stations, operating with or without a convenience store. 24. Frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping. 7) Eliminate the following C-1 uses as permitted under Ordinance 480-U, Section 20.2a: 5. Gasoline Filling stations that operate in conjunction with a small convenience store. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 5/27/97. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * A letter of permission from the, adjacent property owner(s) on the east must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement and a permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. • 84- 7 . • City of Southlake,Texas * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records,and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,Perimeter Street Fee,Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * It appears that Lot 1 and Lot 2 lie within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and a portion of Lot 2 lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of the site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation(required on the north,east, south, and west building facades)per §43.9C 1 e, Ordinance 480,as amended. • . Masonry requirements per§43.9C 1 a,Ordinance 480,as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and §43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43-C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13,Ordinance 480,as amended;and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in§43:9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14,Ordinance 480,as amended. • Residential adjacency standards per §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480,as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per§35,Ordinance 480,as amended and off-street loading requirements per §36, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No.480,as amended. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Terry Wilkinson, Southlake Properties, Inc. Callahan&Associates L:\WP-FILES\REV\97\97047CP2.WPD 84 -8. • 41 i 1 1 • I > �,� / h rx( au K�andalimumma eruno. d 3 Cr)rj`■e A - + cz ...„ A \ d b. . 11 Fw'•va. ( 40 -------- -- 1 ,__ .. - LLI 7 y g ate.p-.Att. \ ,. -� ; .t.......ifitt? c is ait . j is !• ' r b It lit Q ''ft'' a rl.. 1 1 it' I • i so ,. Ifit, ) i ,c.:-.,:*.:v.:•-, ,,A.: It ; .�4 M _,.4 i _ + 1�ja i`. ry J 1� 3 jr�,[ ' c \ 4 111:11 I1 I I.e t � Ig I 1 E. 7 _ tit 51 ... . , . .., :k. .04 4 ...... r —— assos-P1.42 .7„7„,.,,, ....= _____ h fir/• A• I I g~ 1 • i i-- •li RADIO l' 1 P 11�;6 f } ' 1 6 ! (1,:•,..•.::::I. i •-•:: . • • • _ • _ •.•. . . 4 ,' ,..•f•.„...1.,,-,..•.• 6el1. 1:.• ti;.4c-,t'i.*k..t1..ifif:.t...' x 1�I I ii f.I;,- -'-.:."..-:-- t---i...-..1..t.. •. rIstI .1 o • .,,....:•'::.„:..-...,'....•.,„..-•..„....-:4..z1-•::,•.....,_:....:,,.,•„-.•••.•.• r _ 0.4 1 .fi- _ u W .-. ....:I.•., . S•......4.".—........•..-.../........_.....1•"...7.a.i.7.-.,. .. - ..•.. -..".. li,, ,-L_•,if..",,6-,,,:i,..i,;.,. ....K I ry' ( O __:_---,...,,..„. , ..„. .....: . ,1 "I. !,,..„...:.......,.; „. ,,,;......„,.,....„.„,1 ....ti ..4,§ ----",:-•----4 I. -. . -::-.7, s 4-48:. ...... ..zpoy ., ..... .„ at' •".".0' %. I 41....; ' r" �� • 1 • amici... 41. _ t• i !d • t ' i 1 ,I, 3 . . . . - . . ._ ...... • •,.„....,--,„...,:.:.: :,.. _5..,•"f.-.fr::•; ... / • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS a •=• AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING '< OMA AS R SUIt � j ' AND MORE FULLY AND COMA,- ETE��LY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM "S 2 an,` I t �� ""0-I" OF E D tVa: • . DISTRICT,AID L t D"I l' IGH I USA I CT USES TO "S-P- 2"' G 1`IERALI�D ITF_: AI�T°`DISTRICT WITH"C-2" LOCAL IL` CO f 1TED"I-1" LIGHT IND S S, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC • REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL • ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter • 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as"S P-2"@� �[ ii FlaI ,District with "0.4",Offi: #Dts et B i usme` s Service ParkDi trict ant Light Industrial District uses under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-244.SP2 Page 1 gA J j 0 thr WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly ce requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, s WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, Cy' is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-244.SP2 Page 2 • and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately of land situated in they Ab sg ,and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from'S_P ene Lit Q e; e ° .. to m , Bra ', Loc 7-eA el i d I h ttIndtriali �Gt ices, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified,and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been L made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-244.SP2 Page 3 84 -1 violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not, under s4h ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. C MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-244.SP2 Page 4 64- l'7 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY C • C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-244.SP2 Page5 6A_ 14 EXHIBIT "A" C L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-244.SP2 Page 6 8 4 - (S f f / S 1 EXHIBIT"B"I e a. 01 / Vil it •••••••..... 04 I ^ 4_ „.....7,- • n # ( I WIPP------- ____ 1 VW ----------..........:4"4" -1.111....._ *01* 'VI I 3 '�,a _ - 1_" p. �tI. � 0 t` if I �' ' f�:. d '. 7 i ; v4 ih; K,c ifs -.7.,;., Itailitl; � I r VV a 1 I .\ .., '.7.::. il-V....r.•:'':- .'..---,,'",::-'•: 7 - Aii„ , ., f, g� A I� • . „ . 19,11%11141 00 I 0 ..„ \ I t .... ! 2AralQ SVY•dIVIUMIter. i . .• O'Vr1' \ p M 41 I �� 'Aral° ! kb 1 g~ ��Fi J . - -/- ,, ...,-., ., ... ...,,. 1-11: , :.. 1 I,„ 1 . ::„..: ., c h i( ;q4,•;"; ...., 1. ( ] r v' antala IP u' '. 4 le 5 1 $III:.•:::-f;t:i7:;1 ir° . g 1� �i . I1� is W .J . . ... _. . . • . ,. > ... . „1,,,,, I r: . .. x 1 :....,::: :1 1 I `11 :I 12 :f.441,k k"iell0-VITI,'t' - "- —- - ----- - RAMO ....APle} G- • •C TX •' ;' Y N tfs T S _ :M»M MI/ _ 1111 3 T—hlra: iii 51:1 i 4 b 0 4 1 i' / j' LACTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-244.SP2 Page 7 8A - 1(. . City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-048 PROJECT: Resolution No. 97-37/Specific Use Permit Outside Storage for recreational vehicles/Commerce Square STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, Ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, Ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for the outside storage of recreational vehicles on the property described as 4.57 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 3A. LOCATION: South of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709)and immediately east of Crooked Lane. OWNER: Southlake Properties, Inc. APPLICANT: Terry Wilkinson CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, and limited "I-1" Light Industrial uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Eight (8) RESPONSES: Three (3) responses were received within the 200' notification area: Carl and•.Madge Smith, 13212 Glad.Acres-Dr.;,in 'favor. ' "Continue.growth of area." . ' , . • Ken Smith, PO Box 3, Grapevine, TX, in favor. • Catherine Jurgensen, 4138 Willow Grove Rd, Dallas, TX, undecided. P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved (7-0) to continue Public Hearing to the May 15, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. May 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to the Concept Plan Review No. 1 dated May 2, 1997 amended as follows: 1) delete item # 2a (driveway spacing from Crooked Lane) 2) delete item # 2b (driveway spacing from Commerce Street) 3) delete item # 2c (spacing between driveways) 8�- I City of Southiake,Texas 4) delete item # 2d (minimum required throat depth) 5) amend item #3a to eliminate the 10' Fl Bufferyard required along the interior west line of Lot 2, but relocate the required plantings adjacent to F.M. 1709. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all item in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated May 2, 1997, with the exception of those items in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 16, 1997. L:\W P-FI L ES\MEMO\97CAS ES\97-048S U.W PD • 317) ate.*,..' txhz4«Ifitf"i' '"'�c".'�`ri•7 '..',.1,_*,414 X1`(Pa'kfv-- r e - 3 4.. 4` rr • ESTATESSior May 1, 1997 City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Special Use Permit for Outside Storage. I have been made aware by the city staff of the limited definition of the Recreational Vehicle. My intent is to provide storage space for boats and motor homes. This request is consistent with the current Special Use Permit that is approved for this property. I therefore ask that the definition of Recreational Vehicle be expanded to include boats. Sincerely, Terry L. Wilkinson• • • • ._- • REC'DMAY - 21997 • 930 Parkview Lane, Southlake, Texas 76092 • (817 ) 329-4599 • fax (817) 488-2420 • 2 SAa SlN1EY A- -.�.281A�:8C1 ,.{. 1 !�Qb4 Caw, 281 2811 238 297 291r1312A 286 • .. / ( t�auwu :ii e �"}- -' 0,,A r : L��}.{•' 282 28 283 289 295 2810 294,iies bf ' ;_ :'-1~; r7t 1 '4' 1 1 (1• uE 'ii1116 20 20 ZC n 211 2F 2J f _1E4 .'.C'�1 • .{.441,.-i-+ 2P. A `. 1'^ E-I• li 1 i i i i i i " — A7—/� !111i1 2x 2E 20 za zAI i ".",.....2. ! : yT OP •Ir,1� m m , 2A opt SB2 SB2D -- - Dlrl �.:, _. ( 2A1A 11 i, -GQ _._ 2A2 1 -- SB2C _ 2A18 �® 18. 182 .1 tA, 'w A_tSE B �1t, 05 -��.in:11l©© 1 1A 2E� THWEST PKWY ST _ r_ 1 xs zEla 2Et3 a , i D I lg. 0Nr RARi _FAJZ 2£12 3, ,•, . N rip i I AUST•H MACE4 It AD i I tiir, JBS _ i'-'-- -'-l--' 4A �'I jati �� Sa HIGHWAY i ! i 'mil{r UR ,B2 18 E 1E2i. ��._._. 1 i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i .,..'-. ,.. 0, &I. ' d =�7JLA ,'^ {� f'P' 2B 2C DR,/ �A,;�y. A E i 3 , 3D 88 - �� .. 5P I <. r <i,: ; it • 2A3AI 2A2��iri, �u / ! 111111 - y 1Bi 2A '�' •/6A1A v , 1 `---'-fit •� 2A3 2A2A 2A1A 1 �1 r irigth, 2 2A18 381 .� s 3 Ac ®2A �' -i ( q ST IC 2A1 2 ► y' 'A- 1- 1 i 2A3A 2C ' .---- 12.09 Ac 1 . 114 118 _ "9v S 0 E p / f lj i g 1_ OR T�I®f`rMQ Tr F ee 3A lA - -_- A-N{ ! i 1--- _ f K�_ y 5 i SA L 1 �N .Ac o.Aos -; ; -- r, ) or I _s ______(6 6D Ul --1-'�1 :i. . - rtt•' 1 ' i I I 11 t ! • II/' 1 i i ! r1 } �L -11D5A1 - 1104 1 �-I i 383 3 1 GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT 1 1 0 j,i 3 Ac 6.15 Ac • .._.-._.-._._—._.. 1 • I INDUSTRIAL BLED . 1 �� 5 •-{ -__--- ` i ilk' PO Y1 PAR 1 --QUy1N x -_-_._._. ,��'.Va•" D� 61 Ac _ �y-tRlr'� PARK" _•.J t� M0 OP' 1 3 �r..T anrt4\ ti • ! I i I A I ! ! >,� ��0©bQd® AGE i i 1 '{ ;� i l i �_� --,` ``SVRYEY A-70/J i t,1 Eg1 181A - �\� i. N i 166[I `\� `"-..L7,�•"�7j,7��py`.�i 1 _ _� ,iz ' " IBt I L 382 I2 _ -_ eI f 9 I DrfIpN Re 6681 AD IA H . a16683 T >88A1 i 0 6OAD f A I TRACT MAP 183 I ,BIB 48 ��y c�+ - 2 �� N F rn{15 r�i 15 Ac 'SYY' �� f�7 - �' irY MUSED UM 5v V Apt —I - �A I MUSTANG ROAD S P.0 1 . TRACT 6A1 a 5.263 AC 6.406 @ 1.61 AC TR6A1A (1531° 6) ACT 6A TR 361 .005 @ .054 @ \ TR 2A1C 1.237 @ A2 SOUTHLAKE G BOO TR.3 E. .766 @ TR 2A1 O 18 .598 @ z ‘ql 2.493 @ Og9 ; On'• ' • " IA • IRI - GQ , TR 2 1.558 AC .744 AC TR 2C IL, L .361 AC - M R. 2 7. ' @ c 2 TR 11A TR 118 - 7 AC 3.857 AC o • - 3 A CO ------------X" ----1------- 4 TL 4 5 6 ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING 01-May-97 5 if Owner Name Zoning G- c 37---------- o 01 CECIL YATES SF-1A O J p � 02 STATE OF TEXAS 11 1- iv (� P 03 JOE&IZAK GREGORY 11 ¢ H 3 .3 I y ® r 9 04 JAMES&DIANE STACY S-P-1 Q N `� ~ 6 Q��JAMES&DIANE STACY 11 —�J RANDY PACK 11 r]G�j i_ MME I.,o 07 KENNETH SMITH AG r O• --- ? 08 CATHERINE JURGENSEN AG �J 09 CATHERINE JURGENSEN AG H SPIN #7 DARRELL FAGLIE 10 STATE OF TEXAS AG 63 T - F- r • c`r 7 j d3� "' �Vt'{� of � lVL..i,_i!f��J Q..w• _(iii... : p---. __ . svx3.t. ••3xticH.r.nos y . "• 4 '�,. bLb asatl C ®1 i • Aannres 233 ZStl3 SVY(OH.L .J -1 . 0 r h ''� S3iaJtl ZZ'L /.O •.■ / Q .- - O ativnbs moccarl AIOJ 'I• { 8, ft .. l ,,, ba/Aao- 2.m ,.anew..o.a,.oa .-. ac.....-......«oa®$ tl E X 6] Sll oQ 7, g ,., . , „0, ..,..], , , .,., �,...0 0 ..� �.p4 ° :tHflIi!' iJjiiiJh ,„ ..,. . . ,.„„.„ . , ,.. 1 .g, ,, ,.„ .,„,.,, ,,,,, t._,.,II (soft '{q d) QA78 3)fy7t{lflOS • e S 4 i ' and a - _. 1 O L — _ q W ;Jq \ 0 0 B i M Z '4i J� 1- pi Q 8 (Ire () .r. e °ooeuo.rs/awao aasroaoaa - — — — P,& W fete O 5 II, I a d 8 r` �CV � wd 1 — iii,., I�� R at,Y E -- .- ., )—( ---•�_•_.._.._. ,� I [1T �� _ ° ':; z ) ' OI 1 i Tn.S.e ti ---_._-__._. om —ywLw _ - (re lel 1 4 d CO1 3 )I ° DIM i,a • City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 97-04'8 Review No: Two Date of Review: 5/16/97 Project Name: Concept Plan-S-P-2 Zoning Request for Commerce Square being 7.22 Acres located in the Thomas Easter Survey.Abstract No.474 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Terry Wilkinson. Southlake Properties. Inc. Callahan& Associates 930 Parkview Lane P.O. Box 15577 Southlake. Texas 76092 Ft. Worth. Texas 76119 Phone; (817) 329-4599 Phone:(817) 478-1765 Fax: (817)488-2420 Fax: (817) 561-2544 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. ....,...,,.Y i +i'+'1}`..,r..r. ..,... ;i�Y.v'k..,........ .... .,wk:�k.+S6'un,ai..%LX;kXwW.t` , �� ~''��„'� - ?. + '•+b?A•;�n ..h' tr./.:.:;2:+ .?. +r. * This review is based on the "C-2" Zoning District Regulations for proposed Lot 1 and the "I-1" Zoning District Regulations for proposed Lot 2 according to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Cl. Provide driveways in accordance with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. The proposed driveways intersecting F.M. 1709 do not meet the minimum requirements as follows: a. The west driveway centerline is less than 500'from the east R.O.W. line of Crooked Lane. An approximate 200' spacing is shown. (P& Z Action 4/15/97: delete) b. The existing east driveway centerline is less than 500'from the west R.O.W. line of Commerce Street. An approximate 400' spacing is shown. Please note that this driveway is existing. However, the Driveway Ordinance requires that existing driveways mustbe brought into • • compli ance when the trip rate is increased by.-a development:{P&.Z Action'4/15/97.delete)' c. The spacing between the two driveways is less than required 500' for full access driveways. A spacing of 250'is permitted if one driveway is limited to right in/right out only.The spacing shown is approximately 225'. (P& ZAction 4/15/97: delete) d. Based on the estimated parking requirements, the minimum driveway throat depth for traffic stacking is 75'.The provided stacking depth is approximately 50'. Please be aware that throat depth is measured from the R.O.W. line to the point of tangency with the curb return for the interior drive lane. (P& Z Action 4/15/97: delete) e. Label the"Access Easement" along the east driveway as"Common Access Easement". City of Southlake,Texas 2. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards: a. A 10'Fl Bufferyard is required along the west lot line of Lot 2 adjacent to Lot l.(P&ZAction 4/15/97: eliminate but relocate the required plantings adjacent to F.M. 1709.) b. Show the 10' Fl Bufferyard along the north lot line of Lot 2 adjacent to Lot 1 with a dashed line. 3. Label the owner's name for adjacent Commerce Business Park lots. 4. Show and label the type and height of all proposed screening. P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved (7-0) to continue Public Hearing to the May 15, 1997 Planning&Zoning Commission meeting. May 15, 1997;Approved (7-0) subject to the Concept Plan Review No. 1 dated May 2, 1997 amended as follows: 1) delete item #2a (driveway spacing from Crooked Lane) 2) delete item #2b (driveway spacing from Commerce Street) 3) delete item #2c (spacing between driveways) 4) delete item #2d (minimum required throat depth) 5) amend item #3a to eliminate the 10' Fl Bufferyard required along the interior west line of Lot 2, but relocate the required plantings adjacent to F.M. 1709. 6) Eliminate the following C-2 uses as permitted under Ordinance 480-U, Section 21.2: 21. Filling stations or service stations, operating with or without a convenience store. 24. Frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping. 7) Eliminate the following C-1 uses as permitted under Ordinance 480-U, Section 20.2a: 5. Gasoli• ne Filli•ng stations that operate in conjunction with a small 'cp zvenzence.stoxe. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be-received at the City by 5:00 PM on 5/27/97. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the east must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement and a permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. • City of Southlake,Texas * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and Coi filed in the County Plat Records,and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * It appears that Lot 1 and Lot 2 lie within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and a portion of Lot 2 lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of the site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation(required on the north,east, south, and west building facades)per §43.9C 1 e, Ordinance 480,as amended. • Masonry requirements per§43.9C l a,Ordinance 480,as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • . Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and §43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B Col and 43-C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13,Ordinance 480,as amended;and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480,as amended. • Residential adjacency standards per §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per§35,Ordinance 480,as amended and off-street loading requirements per §36, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance.No. 480, as amended. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Terry Wilkinson, Southlake Properties,Inc. Callahan& Associates :1WP-FILES\REV\97\97047CP2.WPD i t . 41, ei 0, '4111.1114milliimA k i :,,,, a....._ lligu lf 4 wAla fl 1 (10.1.I' 'N, 41 r.31 II / I B\1I •••....af... --.......... ------.."' -'''''' ii ..,4•ecorit., 4)..."4"26 mirvg., I tan -------_- rs- Cr) e") ,-- 1 '% AINIVIA,.co ...•••• •ii ) al .."."..•••••••••,1 ..- .. k (------.7 0, cl: ._.: ( I • .,, . _,......, . Z...:., L.,1 •;•t:t'i.. 0— '1 c.,_-- Viiiii.P-,,....:,::.....'1*.:. -lit;•,,::. it I 3 ei...,.. I 1111.14.e..- t.- y ^2:.. . 4:531 I 71 I 14:11.!.41:al ' • At, ad •o - II At :•:;f:.)-: . . * •i t 'iv 71111,1 ti 1 1 iz 1, t -'1'c'f•.'1.'',5:•i . . i .•••,4--: '.,;•••...-'4:;•1- ••.:- I ' 11111 .. .,••••••: :,-.••-,.•;., ,, I 111---'-'—'1 - ) ' :-•.• .... ,•,-.:••!::- t ..,, '---L--:--- - • • .-1 :•!::,.,';.1.':1"...40•..:',..:i',I.•.'••••....:.;•: i.. 1 f.......,,i.0 I .,.,.,.::. .._,.,. I t!, • § . .:.1...7.:-..,..,r.t.:•:-..2.-. • I —— 1 NA. 71.....;.,:i_i...'.1..'.j.,...:.1...: .,:API:''- , •, . . \'; s•.b :1 :...-'-.. :.. . - - . at . ..\ t ....;.;!,,,.......".::::-.:,..-......:...........:..,...,::: . .., i I. kli k I f 14,, -.'....:..:;*,.::,:,•.'..::-:.--- ..-.;.:',.--...:• ..-,' :- , • k f I 1 1 of.-.*;:::i-•4..:,r,::;.;„;-.,.--i..,:a;,...,_-.-..-. ... — 1• .. t (g)3f.::. \ I .1.\ 11 01000•1 00 ,,„, A .„., , .1 : 1 __ ...........A. v........... , i. .• .42.7=70———--7— \, ——I- 7, :..:..:..a.,•!....:-..„..-,:f.---,-,,,,,,c,...?-:z.-(K:11-,,.,;;,;,,,,,,..,E.,,,,,,...:-,-..,,,....,..-k .-,:„..,.......,,,..,..,..,:.......,.,,....,,,,,.,,,,,,_,:.,........„,:7-.. , 42 ----411/ 1 -,..,..;,...,,k•.-.......-.,.;...,; 4154.. UI a'1.,1,-:::`".'''-',•:;--i•''..2;1:..; ' . I 9 y 41 -:"-:. •= .4 ,., 51 ~OW I ili...we a I . . 1 ld.i II 1 It il' • vi as't II, . .-- -• , .• :.. ...' qtd, .z 1 : (..., .( L.,,,,, .........,,, ,. ,..„..),,.. K-r• I ,---, ,P ' •••' .a• .. ;.---;:.•.":. i ,4,..,,r ":::..-::•::.:;.:: III( 'ea ' I./ 1 I 1• Ili; . et iiii 0 gs I x •• .: gi ii I I.v i I lie p I 1 I-11- il tis I- I.- x: "a ON VAINa 1,1;43; I 1 .:i41. 0 w -.I e..: • .- . . - . i :.,%. 11 g ® . 1 ."4., ......,. ..,.. 1 ,-:-.• I -, i 1 !..,,,,. ...kr, . -- -ii- - - •- • - - - • 1 it 2:,,ff- •• i . ... .45i I i '.%." -• I - - , - 1 .......-.. 41 ' v.,.• - , ....-""irteriz,.• t• „,,„,...,.,„ I ...... -- -..=. -- - ---- --)--. ! ill 4 .._ iA11441 34111 • -k•••...?.....i 41-apvii:4*:11n- .44,.„..,,,,,X...,':?.,,,."..:'::1,,,•::•.....A...,:.....,- 3••••2.••••.., am..m...........e.---...7r...,........" ,......-,+. .........:‘,., .. • .0K..1•47r4.".-4-2.-1:,..,,.kw,01,...--7...ji.: 14::.: . "400•7.0,,..."1":4-4-arum... ......,, ' k ,,A.c. _____ -........,... ---at....... l'i ° 1----1---7---4----7_ . T.77--•-• r..ixi 1 mites 1 Ili ----- , t 1 I • g tiii b d Ili 9 i ....... i ::-• • . z/ . .. ... _,_ .., •-- -...- -- .-----. • - - . — - 8F - ( o • .. . • . • .• . , RESOLUTION NO 9747 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR OUTSIDE STODGE OE R A:TIONAL VEHICLES ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BEING APPROXIMATELY 4.57..A•® " ",SITUATED IN THEI}iOWStEASTER.::SURVEY, ABSTRACT 474, BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 3A; MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A," AND AS DEPICTED IN THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for out ide storage of recreational vehic has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "S dP,2' Generate it P 4 t i OfEce —1'Bus ness Serv�c Di and listed"I-I""Lrgh dial i,trct uses; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 4-511'°. 27) of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for n the . property legally described as being approxiimately 4457 acres*situated in the Thomas.E ter ur iey 4`�74�being�portion ofTract 3A; as depicted on the Abstract� Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," subject to the provisionsapproved Concept contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. L:\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\97-037.WPD Resolution No.97-37 Page 2 5. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1997. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas L L:\W P-FILES\RES-ORD\97-03 7.W PD Resolution No.97-37 Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at a 1 inch pipe found for the Southwest corner of said Southlake Properties tract, said point being the most Southerly Northwest corner of Commerce Business Park, an addition to the city of Southlake, as recorded in Volume 388-214 , Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; • THENCE North 00 degrees 34 minutes 23 seconds West along the West • line of said Southlake Properties tract, 405.50 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 25 minutes 37 seconds East 365.11 feet to a point for an ell corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 29 minutes 16 seconds West, 297.96 feet toil .a point for corner on a curve in the Sotth right-of-way line of E. Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) , said curve to the left having a radius of 1,974.86 feet, a central angle of 01 degrees 44 minutes, 42 seconds, and a long chord which bears (hwe North 87 degrees 34 minutes 25 seconds West, 60.14 feet; THENCE alongsaid curve, an arc distance ance of 60.14 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin set for the Northeast corner of said Southlake Properties tract, also being in the West boundary line of Lot 1, Block 'B' of said Commerce Business Park;• THENCE South 01 degrees 29 minutes 16 seconds East along the East boundary line of said Southlake Properties tract and the Waist boundary of said Block 'a' , Commaroo Buninaaa Park, 734.99 feet to an "X" found cut in concrete for the Southeast corner of said Southlake Properties tract and the Northeast corner of Lot 5, Block 'B' of said Commerce Business Park; THENCE North 8.5 degrees 59 minutes 32 seconds West along the South boundary of said Southlake Properties tract and the North boundary line of said Lot 5, 433 .53 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 4 . 57 acres. C L:\W P-FILES\RES-ORD\97-037.W PD 8.5- I / 1 h v $ EXHIBIT "B" . - ` . Resolution No.97-37 , 4 ft tf: s Page 4 V n 4 kit I CY) 1' ..e... • ..........x, 0-) ''' '--' 111 ..."------ ..,......."'"*•••••is. ,.0a-vt..1 c: . , (,,,,,, ti If \11 .... _______-------------4---.. .---- ,, ,...........v 1 <7. ._..-..) 1 e... _ .. . I i I. L•) :I:, f •-2--' - fl I \1 ,-: ,: . •••• — k 1• / ; 4„., ..., W. I ° v 4.l;,',..••::•.;-;•/.1-•::::••••:., . ,.."1 41! 1 I eir.'*4)...`:-•!•.:Y•4•;-:.k lk A, .t. c Pi -.,?:-...:---'••:•• 11 1. 111 ' II 1 '74: i5 , '“4. :At....:4z.,,,,L IA . -.',F.:- .::::.;:..., ••:" I I --+- - — I I -•'.51 .•••";7':5: ' ( ,1 ,; •,4•::.' ',-IS•••!-:-. t I • ,..;•,:::,(17.-.:;:ii.',14":-;',• It E . < '.."4---vSt.kr.l.i'1.:•.t. ' ) -.;,,'• -.'• .-- •• j IIII I - I i N ,--"7 g . ilk Ii.j.../...111 :;';:.,. ; ,ag • / f _ 1 ::::1'1:.*.:;.; :::;:' .; !......., '--: -..,. : . - • .:.., --. • t I V \ti. .::.4. ; _'• .: • ,, - • if lk I I I -.:.::•: ii I -.. i I il I z. II ••. 1 61,11XitIol. 1 I _ —.... l?h t 1 II l ZAIIKI ...' woos-AI ..= z,......=2:. =7 .. ......m.. a... ,,,.... i ____4Ih ...:f1' II t. .;:•-•:;':-.'4-44,:r;Y:'-'.,..:4;4'i'7,,,":1/••••S''"..: C-X'.G.'. •,,•;.- li:•:.:::-'.,-:;...-...-. ."". 1 :.::::',:l.'::::...15a,,:::).t-,:;;;;.-•,:).:1••;.;--..Q: 4-aorlickm.nag •ki.. . "7,t.;. , ...:, ,,j,." = Iv ,• n, r ....... anima g if:4443 e i ..;:::. I ...A• al •: II _.. _11/ . ... . _ • t tf I I I 2.11 I •-i.....,-.;:;'•. 1•';'. I.; L , 1, 4:',.,t':. 21 .---- annici • I .,•...... . ........„ . . . ., • „1(1 ....,,, ,.„, • . _ ,..........,. „ .. .„..z.:,....„... ......:,....:„.......„ .„ . . I t ta r- I— ., ...,;.- lid).11. I 1 .•;!c•: la —I annicl •••: . .1. ••'• d a :,..,..•• _ ,.....;:::r;. 1 44:7i; • . ......... i I '.-- : .... :..... ... .. :.:..... ) '•••• '51:-:-..• b 1 :•:,....-, •-•,:;... 1 ,.., •t-L+F. -__,_________ I VI ..:„ a.-..... I anrao 1111 11 / 4'ilttegetzZiAteet4;"0.,•,'-Ax.,-- ...t.-7..-----.7-7-_, - ___ . . :. .: .!,f, .•• - -...,:c-frucitr*I•f,;;Ii.7,44•?,:, a-20,1;&*.xd'e;i•..-"." •-;'''''-''' : — .- —11 .....a.47.",• '...• ............ ...... -------_,..—,--,_._____ . ,'A' '''''\. ...ak;..W'''' ow6G,7 64....0.3 ,4•..id—-"--"'"""....... .."+.1...= .........T__-""'",.....r•, -,....7..--••• .---..___,........ .. ..- ...._____, 4. ..._..........._ ,...---.. .....____711,7r.__=krfi 1 .3 • i 1 ti•iI. if b e a Ili , 1 1 /".• ' r ...7 L:\wp_FILES\RES-ORD\97-03 7.WPD : .. • : .", ... r.• 87 - iii- , City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-049 PROJECT: Resolution No. 97-38/Specific Use Permit Night manager's apartment/Commerce Square STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner I, 481-5581, Ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator,481-5581, Ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for a night manager's apartment on the property described as 4.57 acres situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, being a portion of Tract 3A. LOCATION: South of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709)and immediately east of Crooked Lane. OWNER: Southlake Properties, Inc. APPLICANT: Terry Wilkinson CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, and limited "I-1" Light Industrial uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Eight(8) RESPONSES: Three (3)responses were received within the 200'notification area: • Carl and Madge Smith, 13212 Glad Acres Dr, Dallas,TX in favor. "Continue growth of area." • Ken Smith, PO Box 3, Grapevine, TX, in favor. • Catherine Jurgensen, 4138 Willow Grove Rd, ,Dallas, TX, undecided. P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved (7-0) to continue Public Hearing to the May 15, 1997 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. May 15, 1997; Approved (7-0) subject to the Concept Plan Review No. 1 dated May 2, 1997 amended as follows: 1) delete item # 2a (driveway spacing from Crooked Lane) 2) delete item # 2b (driveway spacing from Commerce Street) 3) delete item# 2c (spacing between driveways) City of Southlake,Texas 4) delete item # 2d (minimum required throat depth) 5) amend item #3a to eliminate the 10' Fl Bufferyard required along the interior west line of Lot 2, but relocate the required plantings adjacent to F.M. 1709. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all items in Site Plan Review Summary no. 1 dated May 2,1 997, with the exception of those items in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 16, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASEh\97-049SU.WPD L 8C - z 3Ass A(M I Ce 1-e 281,1r12312°26242962e,A 114: 2• . `####-.F wmin.....i ,i282 28 - 1.111 2es 281O 7B4, ej.��tJc l� •• MUMlre2D 2c x a 211 2F 2J , r v" �' 4i- - • rraLnlit.^ P zP ; '�► ,fit r,<S/ Liana J IN Hi zica .._ MIN 06_ 2AI . A 2A 1 10PLNIC5 �. 1 s iris G0 2A2 NPI — 2AIA J (�p(� (��p 1°5-5-1 \ ..-• 2A19 I 1 5818 5e2A -�,-rr:.t AS ISWl7 61f9 �� h alai- 18 In 1 IA, i.1� sMNEY A-/.97 MINIIIph,De •HWEST PKWY EAST ' 1A 2E9c lit g r .s., � 2D ff3 ?EI1i2E13 •w .RAR �i 1� ff1220 0' ,fAR �.�.�_� �p � ,�� 2E6 , ApprrioN ifr i' I 1 di 114 • If H A 28 r i<p: V,..':1A j i i 3 3C x 3e 88• ' lb, �. 5OP5 `:'2E •RRi9 ♦,< FAI r -I _ it , ,, 18t�. .e Zl3AI ��►i►�I SGu •.�jr6AtA� � 'yam�'Z` 2A3 2A2A 2AlA --�1:.''- Fs ,� 1 2 2A1B 381 3 Ac / 1 ! Sr ' 2A i "PPP ��. i l IC N u3A 2 ► --.—._ �.�•1 .144°y: �l�� 3D2 3D f 1 1 `. 11. 11A 118 / i i . c "9� 10 T---• — 1,E --- , P0'GE t t 3A lA r —_ A-f7s ! i 13.6 Ac f.009-- 5 p 014E1 tl% - •. 11D , (111 -1 =ctMs UyDtfTR A 1 R , 1 ç : _ •• I K 1 DTI i — 6 L)//'.lIlDl m t7 i • L�' t ra 1 1 ` 11DSA1 1194 , , I , !---i I ` 3133 3 1 GRAPEVINE an' OMIT ,i T j,l 3Ac 6.15Ac Ici , I V. r N �' i ,. SiN, ,. 0„ 1 E1'� ,,,„ 4 t 04 PAR s : K x ----'—. A - - - di- 61 Ac U51RIAL • PAR ' M it4 J - 1 , j - 4A •i I 1 1 I \ A , ��11 �D ` I I I AAA. WBeDONA ,®'^,_ - SAGE ; t ,,tAsot 0 IMFr+ �t �-.-. WC 3B2 le A., J" 1sw ;GI - 7Y 16ro rot too a r 111903 �� Y tM83.8031 Ap to 4—ti 1 • I111A1I11A • .l N6AtA _. ' .. I.I le6AI • ' 'BIB TRACT MAP SoAo MR IS k • 4crool IUUU �. • i 1 \\ ..tJ k Tp TR3C 6.406 @ 3@ TRACT 6A1 5.263 AC 1.61 AC 4110, TR6A1A fa30 ( ) (kiwq TRACT 6A .O 381 .005 @ 54 @ TR 2A1C 1.237 @ gLVO TR.3 _ E SOUTHLAKE 766 @ TR 2A1 .598 @ 0 6‘ 2.493 @ p) r 0 $ , . . :: TR °� �' .744 AC 1.558 AC TR 2C 1L, ( .361 AC R. 2 c • 2 TR 11A TR 118 7 AC 3.857 AC (we CD 3 ® 5 • 4 3 4 6 4 5 -6 ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING • 01-May-97 5 ---------------- it Owner Name Zoning O 4 0 O 01 CECIL YATES SF-1A --I • 3R 02 STATE OF TEXAS 11 I— n 03 JOE&IZAK GREGORY 11 Y N 3.3 14 ® 9 04 JAMES&DIANE STACY S-P-1 a t4 43 (...., JAMES&DIANE STACY 11 091 6 RANDY PACK 11 G�j F jr'E `n 07 KENNETH SMITH AG (� O M ) .., 08 CATHERINE JURGENSEN AG �J 09 CATHERINE JURGENSEN AG N' SPIN #7 DARRELL FAGLIE 10 STATE OF TEXAS AG 6n "4 5- -0g aor fe Ottt1.2 aft..AM %0 L L P aa.q•.c „_ IV I Q l I`I U �, I . ro�mrmmc yr-= T�-=-= I \ ....�.� ° E'1 . ...i ii C 4'g "a a6 t \ i 1 4 8 ' I o 2 �� 1 L' �• 111 111141 wl l l l l l l l IL. 1 _ w I' � �' 4E r — $ I i A 1 I •il 9. e F E1 T S0c Y�� ! 49 n p Y V F: 6# 8 m _ b C_ O I V ci, r Ce, 1 I I ,,, 13 — — — — - II PROPOSED OMEE/.RORROOR —PROPOSEDO DORMS le < -- --o O O I I , PA\l A t. lit 111• SOU7'yL4 / BLVD . (P31. 19099 P B4� -) /41 s,1113/ 1 1 Q.A 1911140110111111 9 t.; glob i R t 6. ¢ $ '[1 /.1 p r{! (. „..,, ilt 2 T � ,,,,,,,, w, . € I ; I Ya 0Y�[FI 1 4 11 R cowar.r PILAW row,—. eowu.o wso.,s.r .R.Q. ._mvR4v e �a l 1 .d COMMERCE SQUARE RPROOPRO 2W�. OPOO. "�'.) 7.22 ACRES ewo - A r e •D ',4',,,,0 THOMAS EASTER SURVEY '��r r' a ; � •e AHST. 474 ... u SOUTHLAKE. TEXAS ® ;iDI nn Pr 1 , FEB 12 iy96 �i) L ^ JLLc City of Southiake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 97-044 Review No: Two Date of Review: 5/16/97 Project Name: Concept Plan-S-P-2 Zoning Request for Commerce Square being 7.22 Acres located in the Thomas Easter Survey.Abstract No.474 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Terry Wilkinson.Southiake Properties,Inc. Callahan&Associates 930 Parkview Lane P.O. Box 15577 Southiake.Texas 76092 Ft. Worth.Texas 76119 Phone: (817) 329-4599 Phone:(817)478-1765 Fax: (817)488-2420 Fax: (817) 561-2544 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER-CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. * This review is based on the "C-2" Zoning District Regulations for proposed Lot 1 and the "I-1" Zoning District Regulations for proposed Lot 2 according to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. . ' Provide driveways in accordance with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. The proposed driveways intersecting F.M..1709 do not meet the minimum.requirements as follows: a. The west driveway centerline is less than 500'from the east R.O.W.line of Crooked Lane.An. approximate 200'spacing is shown. (P&ZAction 4/15/97: delete) b. The existing east driveway centerline is less than 500'from the west R.O.W.line of Commerce Street. An approximate 400' spacing is shown. Please note that this driveway is existing. However,,the Driveway Ordinance requires that existing driveways must be brought into compliance when the trip rate is increased by a development. (P&ZAction 4/15/97: delete) c. The spacing between the two driveways is less than required 500'for'fiill access driveways. A spacing of 250'is permitted if one driveway is limited to right in/right out only.The spacing shown is approximately 225'. (P&ZAction 4/15/97: delete) d. Based on the estimated parking requirements,the minimum driveway throat depth for traffic stacking is 75'.The provided stacking depth is approximately 50'. Please be aware that throat depth is measured from the R.O.W. line to the point of tangency with the curb return for the interior drive lane. (P& ZAction 4/15/97: delete) e. Label the"Access Easement"along the east driveway as"Common Access Easement". 8G-(4, • City of Southlake,Texas 2. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards: II a. A 10'Fl Bufferyard isalongthe west required lot line of Lot 2 adjacent to Lot 1.(P&ZActron 4/15/97: eliminate but relocate the required plantings adjacent to F.M. 1709.) b. Show the 10'Fl Bufferyard along the north lot line of Lot 2 adjacent to Lot 1 with a dashed line. f 3. Label the owner's name for adjacent Commerce Business Park lots. 4. Show and label the type and height of all proposed screening. P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved (7-0) to continue Public Hearing to the May 15, 1997 Planning&Zoning Commission meeting. May 15, 1997;Approved (7-0) subject to the Concept Plan Review No. 1 dated May • 2, 1997 amended its follows: 1) delete item #2a (driveway spacing from Crooked Irene) 2) delete item #2b (driveway spacing from Commerce Street) 3) delete item #2c (spacing between driveways) 4) delete item #2d (minimum required throat depth) 5) amend item #3a to eliminate the 10' Fl Bufferyard required along the interior west line of Lot 2, but relocate the required plantings adjacent to loo,, F.M. 1709. 6) Eliminate the following C-2 uses as permitted under Ordinance 480-U, Section 21.2: 21. Filling stations or service stations, operating with or without a convenience store. 24. Frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping. 7) Eliminate the following C-1 uses as permitted under Ordinance 480-U, Section 20.2a: 5. Gasoline Filling stations that operate in conjunction with a small convenience store. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 5/27/97. If not received by that time;no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the east must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement and a permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. • 8G - 7. City of Southlake,Texas * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Nat Records,and a site plan,landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans, must be submitted for approval and allrequired fees must bepaid. This mayinclude but not o be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * It appears that Lot 1 and Lot 2 lie within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and a portion of Lit 2 lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which will require construction Standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of the site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site • plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. } • Vertical and horizontal building articulation(required on the north, east, south, and west building facades)per§43.9C 1 e, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Masonry requirements per§43.9C la,Ordinance 480,as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and §43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43-C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13,Ordinance 480,as amended;and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480,as amended. • Residential adjacency standards per §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per§43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per§35,Ordinance 480,as amended and off-street loading requirements per§36, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480,as amended. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Terry Wilkinson, Southlake Properties,Inc. Callahan&Associates L:\W P-FILES\REV\97\97047CP2.W PD 8C -8 I " ! j 41 J d I 01 • I6. 1 II 1 �� 4- d".6 c I vti,..i.,,0,-)11:to. 6_ Nor ... i. ( ) . • , ,.. .., r 2 l .. .2, af• ! d r .,: 1 I iI it liii II it„,,,„,1 .1 ..,. ‘ ,.....„. s.. . 1 , .. ... .. . :. iii 1 t YYJ :. :::;:-.,-.. t . .. , ii ii i \ g iy y 0. :. //4Il4i 1I i ammo— SARISI 14 —'- i awe 3i 1 t' I�� 1( ' `Yy" 4{�Ke t't� r(,,+ 'r•;.:r•-.•an. .,: . s'. [ i + ' • I t q r •...'*:' .�f.. �,+`. 4^•"..t 4144. J..iCV...... J'f7G �, _ �.1. r. 4 g Z A i 41IntrUmobe : Y i/NN0 '� I y1 �� D !/,' _ '::if-- t .k....,..: . rl zl ', :,:„Q„ .. ............... r ., :„:•,_?i: i { : s1/./ L 4.. ts =_ g_; - = 7� � ` _ ._ _ W. Ja ... . it i i iI. JJ - NQ Y,�. I. I .; :. 1..E I O r . i -- ._ _ ii. ..,, i - It • zgnaw : tr >NM MlM1 • � - y•1 �.i1gL4 X�.O� S' ' c L!R —1—fl -1 • AJT r arix. if , • (6) /i • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR m tip ! °° " ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS JE 4, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A," AND AS DEPICTED IN THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for ar, iin1 ugh -x Iearet has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as is k G 1- " 'I.411c8 t r, w • and WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of 4133 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, (lise WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety,morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for ,�' � �� :2;`"x'p dq,.() on the property legally described as R m f, c i t a ; as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. L:\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\97-038.WPD ^ _ 10 Resolution No.97-38 Page 2 5. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1997. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake,Texas L L:\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\97-038.WPD 8G - I I Resolution No.97-38 Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at a 1 inch pipe found for the Southwest corner of said Southlake Properties tract, said point being the most Southerly Northwest corner of Commerce Business Park, an addition to the city of Southlake, as recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; • THENCE North 00 degrees 34 minutes 23 seconds West along the West line of said Southlake Properties tract, 405. 50 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 25 minutes 37 seconds East 365 . 11 feet to a point for an ell corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 29 minutes 16 seconds West, 297.96 feet to_y. a point for corner on a curve in the South right-of-way line of E. Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) , said curve to the left .- having a radius of 1,974.86 feet, a central angle of 01 (hoe degrees 44 minutes, 42 seconds, and a long chord which bears, North 87 degrees 34 minutes 25 seconds West, 60.14 feet; . THENCE along said curve, an. arc distance of 60.14 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin set for the Northeast'corner of said Southlake Properties tract, also being in the West boundary line of Lot 1, Block 'B' of said Commerce Business Park;• THENCE South 01 degrees 29 minutes 16 .seconds East along the East boundary line of said Southlake Properties tract and the Wect boundary of said Block. 'a' , Commaroa aucindaa Park, 734.99 feet to an "X" found cut in concrete` for the Southeast corner of said Southlake Properties tract and the Northeast corner of Lot 5, Block 'B' of said Commerce Business Park; THENCE North 85 degrees 59 minutes 32 seconds West along the South boundary of said Southlake Properties tract and the North boundary line of said Lot 5, 433.53 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 4.57 acres. L L:\W P-FILES\RES-ORD\97-038.WPD l2- / i , it s Resolution No.97-38 l EXHIBIT "B" Page 4 '/ F ti 4 .,(ise: : P .,„„.,.cu -...,_, . k 1E1 is ,_ r.,__ ,___I ,..„ . , , . , if , d ,..... ,... , ._ ,.. ........ , ,:. I- i------------ , i !!6 tzi d` r {�y 11 a �` a #1 11.- i Prix!•o J ' a S` ut ii EIS" ` C t -� I Ar C.. • o ; rf . r 1 �� II ki I et I till... �� II - - - -.\ 131 II 9 �� ® (OwXwd OUti t i (D) ors, �M , — -.,... , . --• iltt m. y 1 6 ..1 od b I „....-„,.. . • . y� �' 'r I -„,-. 1 �' If IC J .,.„. • 1 _ 7 _ .. I iv (1100e.r..;:... # ,. :, 1, � U IP Z I I ..�.. / O 8 81 4 / 7 :I $ �1 pi i 1 I i .1.; i L • qy. zr J — i 1� rJ. •/ / r< 11 anrao _ • K II ••....w,n ,—,— —�. +wi101C•f7 t'"--"-#'i.'x tS't _'-,.6 4 • fir 1T �, _ �=•��_ I • F i s t. JI1lx1 G ` I 11 , Jx1 (ilorf- . ' �% • / • L:\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\97-038.WPD City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-044 PROJECT: First Reading/Ordinance No. 480-242 Rezoning/Rudduck property STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as approximately 4.00 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, being Tract 2C. LOCATION: South side of Lilac Lane at the intersection of Pine Drive and Lilac Lane. OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Jack and Barbara J. Rudduck CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential • NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen(14) RESPONSES: One (1) written response was received within the 200' notification area: • Linda A. Humm, 260 Silverwood Cir, Southlake, TX, in favor. P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved(7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-044Z.WPD • rVT HT rY C II,55*---•-• •-+- los- .4. i LA0• r• ._. • • , i . Al 1. --- 5 "-±- 4 --I:A '-'' -'i ..--<. • ' • te 1 ; ._. 1 1 1 • 4* \ P . . . • i 9.1 2C / i i till i 1 i i •• / i i I I I i •• ; 11171111 'v •,•• : 's s• ,* ....._._._ ! 1 !- • 1 '• ‘'," i "-aroMill. 1 i I 1 '• \ ,' i i .. • • \ 3E y --i- i i ! i / sAtA i I i k ' v. i i AALliricENTENNIAl. i ! )i .`i 41 r # ' # f, #' # i# #'1 ' ' IA • wy A-606 3CI 113 i i i / 1 i t onr/io 1 ;1 1.11.011 1 ji .1. ! ...• r II JL .4 . •i- P i i i i i 1 .381 .__. __ ;,• IA ..,..,, .,_ _k_t _1.. . 25 Ac 3318 .-• ,. •,/ . / • i i .I 1-•-• i - 22 Ac 382 114 •a ._ - CEI 4r 1 7.666 Ac 14 23 figscost , --. ' , --. , / •,...,, i. ..,-, 302 ., vier ... - -- ..--133 • .! ' 11.1• ---!••—•i-—1 3D2A, 303A.1. II : • - i - • • • 2 I A.4 L.CL. .Px•_ LWOLieRful_ _ ., , 7., 502 .. x x• \ t i 5F 5E 50 501 502 ---,- - 5C 3A 341 3C 38:\ - r•"i ill -711 .. •,. thi , ‘‘ —LI• • • - r- __- A • i 311 ea ,..... Ac 3.56 Ac • _ 4," • i ' - \ • •„ ts•-• i 1 i 10 Ac 6 Ac ,•-'."11143 Ac 4-57 Ac sLe.?, . . 301 ,i4091‘' Pi U k 301 ,:i 'I ..-.- • I ? 15 Ii" ..- , - . . ._., — gal ; 21 .,-• flt•i .L.. / ' I - ;1EE 1 , $59 r-, ., 302 • rf, - • i -.- 15 Ac 1112r .G. Eli ' 3----------3° 3 401 X •••,...-.,All _4-.- -, --r-I *LT: , _ 3K ‘ , _.. y il air 10 2A2L;. 2A5 .,, 2A3 a '*- f •-• I' ' *-- '2.. JrLP 4 42 t1.1/.• :. ,. 1.. .. • . , .,. "..--. ) • IP ,,..---...., _.. --- , MINME2 ' el V4 , ON.. ,..... .. ,.. PINE CIA/111 CA 11 il " :1111 ,,,1-4-4/ ii..-\:: '" \ / ••• T 4E1 / l'' ""' / ! i \ W A,C MP./ I e. ' • 21 ! gli ' 1 •l`k, i eg IF ni. 2B1 ' • 11:..i'• 2B . •A i.'50• 133 •; OBEDI.All Vig.\.,KilkiiT 20 5 Ac wkirr 4 Ac IA SURI.EY A--8$0. ' c-T. w riA 48 .e• 1 ' \u •is . . . 1 . ., DUL-1- 'ikt,014 CSA:\ 6i 4„...i =,.2 . 2C2A I ' A' . - .. i.c.if , iiii se \ --.1 I • . I- • 1 .•i .. .., • • • • ,-- ,•-\., 5871 Ac ,,---- ....„.5j, •;! i 1 t!.1-4•! ' 1(1:4 i -••••• I.1 HIRAM GEtia.41F,... -1-_ 1 ' _ -,., is. if. .i3.• 4 sumer A=vrin : : P r ..-/ 58 i "A :1 41• ..,C..41; „:>•i- _:- i i „ 'L._ \ 444 ..r.'•X 4 A .}..k. ;•-,., .Atir.-. . ! i ' . :,,,,:,..,,....:•. ". ik y \,.._ r 5c - • • - .., . ..H. .. ii.1 . --...„4,,, e.; ` - • .5- / . I- --: • • •. •N 1 1 L. -j -Ad r..*1[----.-.' .4., 11ffk 4 lc . i / -I"- 4 - • • I - 1— " •-•1--i-• !.. _r.4.1.:..1, -1-- - ' x :utnia7;114%/ .\::: _• ... I ! - g,__i.-- 7 T-f--i- ;• -.... i i ! • / --, :. -J..1.13.MIA ; i . . .,,,!,1 V il 1145 'I'll. t"..... ,4111PIP. 111101 I •.. V i 1 +rl- — oarac....11 • , ANA•all•' A. .40 - , ,. „.....,....,,,„ .J....4_.±. :.„•,‘ -- i ! • i i • • •AiZe`*--,---L- --61- i raii.t.j. , r'.4. / ! 4 ;' !/ •!lams: _M • ! , ! i ! i. i . I " :•...../• • ,ot ill -•"-... ,‘. - --1-- • 1 11411,".1e: ii,.". II. -. 4411c41114'.143.0 .... '.,. . '1; ii iii -t- ' Pu •--- een...4.2.0 • I „-J014111,. • . . ,:l " • ' APP';-, FK 4664 -'...., ,,h,''.1i77 - .- ,i/ i IA 18• IF_ ----fr"--, i 1 •..`'. 1- e •,..- pl) - ilfW / / • * . 1 ---- .--• .-. 4-- ill ! 1 lig . . . j, ._. _ .,...4 1 / A -A.v.-- ; :r.:.„....zr....... ,.. -„, i ..01111.......' .01ra... a.A., ..._•,. .....,........''''..---, \...-... !. ' V / 1111111111 ........ ....... •-... e...• ..... 1i .. ....'•'.5,-.:-.-4. li-r-r-r-r-!--r-.--,-,_,.....7, I RR , f..... ,_ ,_,...n.,4 rump''•-• \ a] %, ••-, --...., .-. - ,. .. " . iiiii ". ii • ! iiiiiiii 1 1 --1 -1 . • , 1--, ,:,..r- i 1 • ' •• • .-i J.AN4AEMANA", .. i :.:1.,:;:i'....... 31.-t ....is- •'''''4‘ 1 I alke" i 5 '1••• k-5. •- '' --L.- . • i i i • /F.' • A.,1-...) f--r. • I: " i , I ' -1_4_ - •titit i ../. • . _...... iodi i . _. _ , 1 1/41. i r-., '..,,,f.., ...,. .L. .'-`-` . • ' 1P'5.- - - - l ., .„,-..4 • g••••0 /-.... _ ; • i i - • - i -, . "--1" • -i k • .-1* ! . i ! .1 .....i...._ - _— - • • ..,' '7• 1,. .-r.• :,anal.,.i ......i. \ • • 1 '74, ,d*. i ii.... 1 ., i ''' ..\):•• •C:A,-! N.P.' • , ••...AO P i . \.... ....)c :la 1411 '_ — .., 201 .-lc. . r-1--i 4,.'"\c". . '.>•• i '' L. • ..- . -f.... ...• "k145 • 1 4 n , / ok. -• .1 i i••• i i '• i;I 4 I -- T : . -...- ,- i -:,.',.-,:v . i / --.. ._.t i 7 . 213 AC 3283 Ac • . . 4 r ,• ., ,f .4 - / i t' MI' ; .—I 4, 7. '. .E..i4 1 • -\,--'..---......-1.‘ (---- -- N.....',. .- ----4:*'• • ? i ‘ ';''. " ,:.,-,..1”!i.i, ._ HOLLIGTH • r • e. 1 •A•.Ma-. . v _ a iga:i . ,.:.., ! ". • , 1 ! I i ‘ : • . :‘ •-. . t 6-... - 78 /' 3-•! 1 A. , 0 .,....1._„•\.. ..,.. - • -&--- GO , -..... I -. I • , . i 1 ./ ''•••,,,,. i:.. .i H,ALL MEDLIN i \\,,,,- . ,. ., f . • : '"(--.... SLIMY A-1057- . . 1 : . 1.rt. .-i ..." ; ,.. .: ; . .' . _ .. le .-.,;- ' .----1 t ' • .....`1•.. i. , , I „..e 1 - ."-.. ....,.....) v' ;.'-<. ---. „. ,, ...- ••••,,es, i, -f....v .......- x , ... . .. r.,()O IC - .. .,i - • •'• I-. .7\ 1 ' . • '• • / ‘ • J • e-' ... ) ,o, .....1E i, • /NAL; TRACT MAP ... , ... _.......... e 5r ' ., / / I '• -'14 I ID • •- • -1 ic-- -...J. V 8E-p-- jel 341 1 -3 'ON.3,.._ q 1.... 0 y5 1 .. , 21� �� 0' SURv g9 Rti 1 A,s SQUA � � 0 $ TR 2B1 s r jN 2 co 4.0 AC S V �O'�`Z 'r 1 Lre • . �;1 1 3 `J 2 N I 0 ` • en 1 H l �) 1 2so 2R1 `� LILAC \. 2.948 0 ,» 3+2 ._/:, '. I . ar R / 2" ,7. �% 31 �% BAREp 2R3 t 2R2 A w 1 1 00 0 too 0 L._ e 21 DLO i WHITE CHAPEL CT j C) TR 2C2A • III • 154 R TR 2C3 $ _ 7.0 AC 0 23 25 ' 4. C _r I' s ) 77 ' LID 3.54 ACi1 r 2R6 -+' 2.181 0 t / 4. 2R5 It _ R -• 3.919 0 / I I I / . ~ .... L N x 423 - ' :2 CO ▪ 102 = 340 S i V 07" \J O .0 15 ▪ \J 22 R 21 20 . 19 • 18 g 17 _ 16 - I , .... W 1 1 23 2 f 1 I1 . U SILVERWOOD CIR n 15 r , w o , A42 Ire 1I--- 4 / s' S r 6 a 14 _ g 7 s 8 g 9 � oc ADJACENT. LAND OWNERS AND ZONING "' �, Wa 13 ,� > 01-May-97 , 3 2 I 12 / # Owner Name Zoning 01 SANDRA TALLEY AG 02 WES &CYNTHIA RYON SF-IA 03 JAMES FULTNER AG 04 VIRGINIA CARLILE AG 05 JAMES&JOAN KRAUSE PUD 1 06 JOHN&BEVERLY WELCH PUD 1 07 JOHN&LAURA KOSTER PUD 1 RICHARD&LINDA HUMM PUD 1 SPIN#10 AL MORIN DALEN&DARA THOMAS PUD 1 c ROGER&SHERYL MATZ AG 11 STEPHEN&SHERICE BEZNER SF-1A 12 STEPHEN&SHERICE BEZNER SF-1A 13 DELORIS PEARSON SF-1A 14 ROY HEYNE AG estE3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCF.�ANO 480-242 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM' ;.G"A _ UTL A DISTRI('F TO"SF: I11' ,. . SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS.ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY, CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; (le PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG A +u;r District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by L the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-242.WPD Page 1 S 6 producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout • this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly . requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being 'lf,e) 0 ,1 04 • i; 3iFTi 2 and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-242.WPD Page 2 8�-5 attached hereto and incorporated herein,from"AG-"Agricultural District to "SF-1;A` Single Family Residential.District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, • subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-242.WPD Page 3 tge.i Y Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: L CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1997. MAYOR • L:\CTYDOC S\ORD\CASES\480-242.W PD Page 4 86� (61.- ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY (N. L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-242.WPD Page 5 8eA EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron pin found, said paint being2000 fight he core r'of Baer o Lot 'p0 • f�set North of' the Southwest corner of said ,• ' Survey, point also being said Phase One, Section One, The Slide 23, :glock 3, , 0td1ngn, lat. reCorded is Cabiaet. A, gi9lsl sFn�s, acfcordiny to p Texas; 1014, .�'1at..•Records, Tarrant County, - b� Survey, forth;, al�onq the West line of said ;Night THENCE S g iron pin found in Lilac Lane; • 82�.©O: ��eb. to a / East, alongTHEXom South 89 degrees o0�nail for corner; Lilac Lana 210.21 fe , t+ �4 Ie THENCE South, 827 .66 feet to a 1/2" iron pip found nd corner in the North line of said Block 3, Timarron Addition; e said North line, 210.20 .feet' to the (we , ail s 4.00 actress of land. �� iINNING and containing pQlli'1' L L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-242.WPD Page 6 City of Southlake,Texas Cie STAFF REPORT May 16, 1997 CASE NO: ZA 97-045 PROJECT: Plat Showing/Lots 5 and 6, O. W. Knight No. 899 Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner II,481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Showing of Lots 5 and 6, O. W. Knight No. 899 Addition, being approximately 4.00 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tract 2C. LOCATION: South side of Lilac Lane at the intersection of Pine Drive and Lilac Lane. OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Jack and Barbara J. Rudduck CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Fourteen(14) RESPONSES: One(1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Laura Koster, 250 Silverwood Cir., Southlake, in favor. P&Z ACTION: May 8, 1997; Approved(7-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated May 2, 1997. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all items in Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated May 2, 1997, with the exception of those items addressed in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated May 16, 1997. L:\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-045PS.WPD L SF-I . I J I i 81-14"1 •.>_...4._-. ....1._& ________._. ._._._.__. ,. 12fp .... ..,,,,_____ _i .?_m_yi, z• ,,-,cr • !5 _ ••c- ,.t .7.-. ._. _. 1 / ."4 •-•-ri-°---- ---"-9 Iii+31 LI-- i ‘ seta.? %--i--P-P--•t---..A-, 3A1 • I i i \ \ '' .2' / i . Y -r-7 • I • 2 q. 3A1A ! 1 1 t-lt j i It -i, i I; _;-. ALOgicfalltNNIAL i I ! ) ilt ( f 1 1 1 g i 1 PO ii % iii ! I i ! !. •‘. I i ! : ! ! ! ! t ___ _- I -471 I ! V I 331 { : 25Ac . , . . . , ,, 31318 Mil ll; i '...." '.7,17 ,..''N 22 Ac -- . an i -..z. , - a•la:12..11.a•an., .",1! . 7.665 Ac 3.4 As 3 I 333 . ,••'''. i •,.. 1..' r 3 ' 'k'sc , POC°4816 , / i ;PP., / ''.f • .,., i i 1 E ...." 011015-• .,..•' 'i -r... , ....... 3C ' Ore( P11.. co ' . .-.... • i A____ ,-... 7,31D 1E7' 301 3Fls. 3e2,A 3A1 51171-7D4 - - -1 I : .I-1-,•,. - . - _ I ' 1--* i 2C : 3C _ - --- ..,..„1 k . 6 I 2 Ill."7 3C2 /. ii 5' 5E a 50 5D) 502 5C 3A 3/.1 3C 38 IC •• 3111 A 0-1.po 50A. • i •'''' -- , 1 . 140PI 9 10 Ac 6 Ac .."'Op Ac 4.57 At DI G • k /.-4f. i..1.•1 . . ........ s. . )''' Il "*. ', ki co - 2.95 3„ 5-M.,.-J Ac 1563: • 12 • 1 15 Ac/ • N./at...L.,. .-J I $.1./ • I -- 4. 2' - : 34 ,... .. ph ,,,, u Is ' .,.c s• 3D 302 • --=, _ •1 • -t _-: 15 Ac ) NI 'GIT a Ila XX. •..,.,,,..,4 4_ -. -..1---I " ., s< , 21 2A2 2A5 2A3 2 .., i ti ‘ ‘3,,, •Y NI , 401 CI •s'•\'4" 42 //Au_ ... I. 2A18 ..., I* • .• it--. :. ...1 3 . .... t .•' _ .. ';-: =MET •05/t „,.-•,. .0.... _, r- i i , MININIE17 , ph.. ,........... 21i ,--, •-• , ---- - ?I PINE COURT I illiallfil 21 Ac 4- K • .( / i i .::..N.. IMF 0. ! - 0.,.,,. MILT p,, w ' i -• ,..' ', al IF 7 : 28/ i vt1 1••••••3•,:i 2F3 • El ..„.. OISEDIAH Ilf.\\ k",MA?' HT 1'5' • i ;.----r 51i014•V i. CO -..t. 20 k SURSEY A-89.r. 5 At rail 48 l*Irr 4 Ac .1' 1 1 , fI II 04%• , i ::-:, . . . I 'SW •--. 50.71 Ac 4.5 Ac _ _. ' ,.. '.2c2" CHW i' eimr• ! - - i 4 c 1, ( 4i-'I-I/; k 1‘- ,r 1! AM6t ' ' ' ' ' i ' ..6.)%-k-,it r:.,'i,-%.g. ,.:.I,,.-4i4••4 47..:4• *1••7-4•;.7•pm1•.;iii.4!p-t.ii+ii€,-•i.'+l,•..,.I i.'r'+'.,l, 1cIt+'P,•:., 4 .•. ..•, ,,'•-•'s'1 .k•.-••••-_--,-..-_- • J ,,,,..,!,. • ......„N........1 : ,..,..„.. ,, i•-• rn7.7"i""!"....-1AL • le k '•• 740 i -_. if ' . i.„...,Sit,-,... ., -,,„ ___Ev_k_6,er_ci ,, _ - Lirjr)-T. 1-Ati'A • ' ' • __, . • • , -. ',- i L. j 1Z • 1- .. , .94. :;111010,10: . 1 i I 4-4-- 7f .__..• -1-- ; • V ! f ! !/ . \i- •--- 1 ! - i _i.._ • -r-t. ;- ••• i i• i • ,• , III . , .... -_LIANA?WA Y. 114e 1144 '4" .. ,. -... i i i • I ' . 0:Ira tram.111 1111 ' JiLqw,..-•mei..) P ---- i tsiZeP-ririi-,..3. 011 ..4 • ' -.. • j 1/4-1 .. 1. S. • .-•• • ili -- 7 .... i / S.W.: • .1 , • :,.... •-•13 am - ..-....,...."..., t..,. ii 1 e.--i- -;-- iti --t.- - P - •1_,... t.u.a.,, .4k. •-•' z Jai : . i i i I_ i i N ,„.r-- . 4....,..e.../.%. i ! '41a...-....,;'.. 11 ' • 1 -0°T•015. Asilior ri,jit . ,.•,...,.. . ......, .,..,:;,17.;,• .. ......1. 61E1. .1C .----4e-,----• ! Ie.,i i 011. -, • -1,-.. ' ..;aik •i 31:VA- t *IP 1- ....• I .1 • ti L.-f.,‘„„1 11 g . . . ),_ ,,;,,,;4 • -4 i . / ---- : -_,... /‘2....TINNERI. \ .11 i . . A .. . .• -----• .... , .._...„ . i . . . . . . . • . • . • • . - _. __ _. __ , ! , .....,,, ak IL_ jA -1- X itl • • Iiiii ! lin-7-7! ii . olit , , , ,, a......„4-• eporic-,.....,...-,....,,..p• \ ‘1 -1••••,... .,,, •,,,, . / I; • ; ...,4. ..•••••• . . . . i .$ _ - I; • .41, 11 1 : '. il -r" . N - , i . 1 i i • • ' 1 7 si - • ' ,\ Vh IA -, I. 1 ! !.. ,•- 4_ _ 4.. -•-•• •k--i-4 •••„ •4:„..,cD .• , ..,,,,.., i•-•., .2- •*ti..; i li i 1 )c. i .ji! i- i. ....i_ ..., \ i • -/•., ? i 1. i ; I \‘Tc..../-‘,..,•-• "'.,•13./,,•••t. .i - ,..3C a '•GaTNIM/Iliall.'.! • - • 4 -; • ,•.-%. . !•A-i•-1 il '14,•'\'' " >'• 1 i' :•.J1 i 11.1 --1-•"" .....' : ‘1 '' 1 i "'••../ ‘...•..• .P/' • i i -4.. i .1*. .41 •,:--=:!--• .... - _ ; _. : ,-,•• / .....• 1 a '::i i 1 ' 23.3 Ac 32.83 Ac .,, ' .•• ' OF _.i • 7 1- -. 4''---'----1 (--- . -I • • . ,.,_ !tirsTry.: ..• 1 . ... ....v..111.CUM ,,..--,. i OLLIMG3404 -,-',Tli - • = -, . ! . ., / ! ! ! ‘ ,.., .=BE ' -, --,.. •- • i ... .-.., • --&----. GOU i i )1 i•-• / A 1. .,-..ii..,‘,. .... 1 ( . NN. 511 '`,.._ r• tr NALL MEDLIN 12,/,knAJ F;T T ! \ i ,1777.' '- Y i - • i '- .-.. ;, SURVEY A-I0.17 SUPPler,4....„ ogle __at-' --L-P-/-,/ >4....4_,;/_,/ • , • a i -!:-.-•• , 142 •':: . / IF -i'; ...-4 i '. .1 . . ----1 ' ! -=1: , ' ! ! ..i" ,'" --.! .... _:, ..,...7 ••• .... .. ,s, ., "f..41 :IIIIMMIO. \ , '• ••• ..-.. / • ---.... • :3 1 IC 'st'' : ':......- .; .4C. It\ 1 ' . . . 1 / N‘S. -... • . ,....110,04 / ' . TRACT MAP 1._____ , 411' a • , 1 , , ID f 8 F-7- • ,, . . , . 1 ql- ___ ..‘ 28.88 Ac• t.)\..77 21 S A,s99 UAR in-N • 1 ID $ TR 261 's Aco 4.o AC s�" 22 • �O (4:ki., us v 1 2 3Ci-N 41 - I �� _1 \ 7+0 2R1 11.9 LILAC \ 2.948 0 110 341It R! It 7a 17. Nk •i31 �� ;OMMO 2R3 = 2R2 a C R AREA 1.00 0 1.00 0 �— t n WHITE CHAPEL CT200 / O TR 2C2A 1a7 ,,, • ,� o R TR 2C3 is 7.0 AC �0 i p • 21i 2 I II 4. C 3.54 AC f 1 r 2R6 -J' -, 2.181 0 t / a 2R5 A _ 1.919 0 / 1 n ) A .7a 7/0 �+ _,+ aao ,02 U CO 1 % R 21 , ZOO . 19 • 18s 17 ! 16 1 1 1 23 \—..-.._____ &L:? K. » L {� SILVERWOOD CIR 15 42 n ° ao +o ,a A ,» _.... r l �. _ _._.. 5 $ 6 ! 7 g 8 R 9 g c 14 ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AND ZONING `1'° 3 IC 1n ++ 13 +1 11-May-9 7 d ®� t,7a 2 # Owner Name Zoning 01 SANDRA TALLEY AG 02 WES &CYNTHIA RYON SF-IA 03 JAMES FULTNER AG 04 VIRGINIA CARLILE AG 05 JAMES&JOAN KRAUSE PUD 1 06 JOHN&BEVERLY WELCH PUD 1 07 JOHN&LAURA KOSTER PUD 1 08 RICHARD&LINDA HUMM PUD 1 SPIN#10 AL MORIN 09 DALEN&DARA THOMAS PUD 1 10 ROGER&SHERYL MATZ AG 11 STEPHEN&SHERICE BEZNER SF-1A 12 STEPHEN&SHERICE BEZNER SF-1A 13 DELORIS PEARSON Q SF-1A CJ 14 ROYHEYNE F-3 AG 1 City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY ase No:ZA 97-045 Review No:Two Date of Review: 5/16/97 Project Name:plat Showing-Lots 5&6.O.W.Knight Addition No.899 being 4.00 acres in the O.W. Knight Survey.Abstract No.899 APPLICANT: � SURVEYOR: Jack&Barbara J. Rudduck Clarence W.Hart.R.P.L.S.,Area Surveying.Inc 217 Lilac Lane 102 W. Trammell Street Southlake,Texas 76092 Fort Worth. Texas 76140 Phone: (817)481-8332 Phone: (817)293-5684 Fax: Fax: (817)293-5685 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/12/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KIT LOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. * We find the applicant has met all the requirements of our previous reviews. * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink,other than signatures or seals,appear on the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Jack&Barbara Rudduck Clarence W. Hart,R.P.L.S. L:\WP-FILES\REW7\97045PS2.WPD SF- �� T �, 1 o iti iii 1 I I I ft e P €.2 :,r,,, , c I-1. :! dii ti .-"51 1,se1r,i giiN8i 1.i1;b i i s s: "q L i1=1 sI 11111i 3 - • 1 .+ ao 1? - I-. ]�t � _' 'ii i :; 1 t o1• 1, 5 a° c _ .°`g o r. • 11s1 �l iNps3 i1aisle. 13 igi i.h• i J „wz b 1p P sitai 1 i1 • ,ii wi is 53 ''$ • 1I13LJt113f !kI.ib !i !t hll t • V1.I,I: � I Ali a i $ :1 : S 1 lijj it 1� u 'i_ �4!112 1 tali 1 hi• J ,Es )gi �� i. l Vsii� I ' Iliiiii lt 4fib Via, : tfljifli iiil.! . ..�it . .. ‘ct . i °. ..5 tg 11 / 1..-----.,:.• .D.. .il a j I"I a c IC i fif diii - • 1 g I 1 1 1 . c a .15 -.Eta-0 tia g ' 1 - �r .d IjeitA ;w 1. !I , 1CS 31 I ii ( I ill c O§ 18I§ 1 caiwtat.'r.e ! I a rr 1 3 4 .I. $ ...iv,on-. I• 3 .E ft 5 f_11- _ iI I 3 gj w c ri w I a., I toI r ,� J 8 g 668 °�1 S9d l � _J i 1 L--�, .a. I --- t(eA n 14 !uN •M •p 1 3 !fit Q ipWd _�� Z'��f J il IV... .—.—.— .—. . 1 •—._.� C L6e'P!S V t•iny° - O 1 ——— T .\ \ UO!I Pv r d "�. � i � ;, v!. .,�, �l o f I °�� I hat 3 is in I I v l,I XenJnS X.LiegUDJ0 WDJIH 1 i`, 1 1 1 oI8r 1 1 Itl I 1 C City of Southlake,Texas J MEMORANDUM T May 16, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Chris Carpenter, Planner SUBJECT: Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance-Park Dedication Section Draft#7: SUBSEQUENT TO P&Z MEETINGS OF 5/1/97 and 5/8/97 Attached you will find a proposed ordinance revising the entirety of Section 7 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. This draft reflects a combination of recommendations by both the Park Board (during their March meeting) and the Planning and Zoning Commission(during hearings on May 1 and May 8), as well as language suggested by the City Attorney. The draft ordinance that follows contains the following markings: • Normal text: The language recommended by the Park Board in their fmal draft and accepted by the P&Z in their recommendation. • Strikcout tcxt: The language recommended by the Park Board which the P&Z struck in their deliberations and motion. • Redline e t The language recommended by the P&Z in their motion as a substitute for the strikeout text. • Italic text (redline or strikeout: The language changes recommended by the City Attorney in a letter dated May 14, 1995 and other discussions with staff. In summary,the P&Z recommended keeping the potential credit for private parks and the same land dedication ratios and requirements that are in the currently adopted ordinance,while recommending that the Council look at revising the method of calculating land value for the fee payment alternative. Also,attached behind the draft ordinance,are several surveys performed by Other neighboring cities as to the current status of park dedication requirements in the area. Please place this item on the next available City Council agenda for their consideration. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call 481-5581, Ext. 866. CLC\cic cc: Debra Drayovitch, Fielding, Barrett and Taylor Kim Lenoir, Parks and Recreation Director Sherry Berman, Park Board Greg Last, Community Development Director L Gl7 I L 1 ORDINANCE NO. 483-F • ORDINANCE OF THE CITY_._OF SOUTHLAKE ,AMENDING (1;►9 ' ! I • - CE NO.483,THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANC REVISING THE Cl NTIRETY OF ARTICLE VII, PARK AND RECREATI N DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL OTHER ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 483, as the Subdivision Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined thatlin order to provide for adequate land for parks, recreation and open space, it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to amend Ordinance No. 483, to authorize the appropriate park land dedication requirements, or facilities, or improvements, or fees in lieu of said dedication requirements; ;sib j°tI, .,,,�, , fir ( .) (%bvie,, ,vi ;No t,,,,,r s , • ,,,t,- -• ,'-, ,, e, filg,af: Rs,: Ff de st V,',r4 a , ,,, ' " :-ol ://y 1, 1 rid, ;:'),(1 , >A , 4 14: <,): $A,4f , NOW,'THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. Article VII of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended in its entirety and replaced by the following text: C. L 2 ARTICLE VII PARK AND RECREATION DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 1 7.01 PURPOSE AND INTENT: The requirements for open space, park and recreational areas 2 contained in this section are intended to ensure that there will be sufficient land dedicated 3 or otherwise set aside to meet the demand and need of the future residents for open space and 4 parks. In determining the size, shape and quality of open space and parks areas that should 5 be set aside and reserved in the manner set out in this section, the City has considered the 6 projected growth in population and development within the municipality and the amount of 7 open space and park and recreational facilities needed to accommodate such growth as stated 8 in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. 9 10 7.02 APPLICABILITY: A. Unplatted Property: This section, as amended, applies to all property for which a 1 final plat has not been formally submitted to the City for approval, unless otherwise 13 noted herein. 14 B. Exempt Property: Any tract or lot occupied by an existing residential dwelling unit 15 at the time of adoption of this ordinance shall be exempt from the dedication 16 requirements of this section herein if the residential dwelling remains on the lot. This 17 exemption pertains only to the tract or lot with the existing residential dwelling.Any 18 additional lots created by further subdivision of the property shall be subject to the 19 requirements herein. 20 C. Date of Assessment: All requirements contained in this section shall be assessed at 21 the time of approval of the final plat of any applicable property. 22 23 Col L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\DRAFI'7.WPD L 3 1 7.03 LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS: 2 A. General: rfr ' s " 3 Lind - . z g 4 thev 6 Rlat o 7 1. Residential Developments: Based on the population projected to reside in 8 the City of Southlake and the stated desire in the Parks,Recreation,and Open 9 Space Master Plan adopted by the City Council to provide 21 acres of park 10 land for every 1,000 residents in an ultimate condition,park land meeting the 11 requirements contained within this section shall be dedicated to the City at 12 a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every twenty-five (25) fifty 13 residential dwelling units or prorated portion thereof. 2. Non-Residential Developments: Although non-residential development 1 does not generate residential occupancies per se,it does create environmental 16 impacts which may negatively affect the living environment of the 17 community. These impacts may be ameliorated or eliminated by providing 18 park or open space areas which buffer adjoining land uses, prevent undue 19 concentration of paved areas, allow for the reasonable dissipation of 20 automotive exhaust fumes, provide natural buffers to the spread of fire or 21 explosion,and provide separation of lighting, waste disposal, and noise by- 22 products of non-residential operations and activities from adjacent residential 23 areas. The City has therefore determined that non-residential developments 24 must provide dedicated parks and/or reserved open space at a ratio of one(1) 25 acre of park land for every twenty-five(25)fi 0.) on-residential gross 26 acres of development or prorated portion thereof 27 3. Off-site Dedications: A developer may dedicate the required park land for 2La development at another location owned by the same developer within the L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAF\PARK DED\DRAFr7.WPD (ire 4 1 City with the consent of the City, provided that the off-site land dedication 2 is in accordance with this section. 3 B. Transfers and Credits for Prior Dedications,Fees and Gifts: In considering the 4 amount of land dedication required of a proposed development,the City may, at its 5 discretion,apply former dedications which were in excess of the requirement at that 6 time to current or future dedication requirements of the same owner/applicant. A 7 dedication or cash payment in lieu of dedication made prior to the passage of this 8 Ordinance shall be controlled by the provisions of the ordinance in effect at the time 9 such obligation arose, provided the final plat has been submitted to the City for 10 approval prior to the passage of this Ordinance. At the discretion of the City, any 11 former gift of land to the municipality may be credited under the terms of the current 12 Ordinance toward eventual land dedication requirements imposed on the donor of 13 such lands. c11°' 7.04 . CHARACTERISTICS OF PARKLAND: 16 A. General: The Park Board shall annually recommend to the City Council a summary 17 of the character of dedicated park land most desirable in meeting the objectives of the 18 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. These characteristics shall be 19 provided in an abbreviated written report to all elected and appointed officials, city 20 staff, and the development community, and shall be placed in Appendix 11 of this 21 ordinance. In determining whether to accept or refuse the dedication of park lands, • 22 fees, facilities or a combination thereof as outlined in section 7.05 below, the Park 23 Board and City Council shall consider this written report as a guideline for such 24 decisions. 25 26 (.1 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFIIPARK DED\DRAFT7.WPD 5 1 7.05 ALTERNATIVES TO LAND DEDICATION: p4 � ,bg� 3 2 _. s- t pa ,varea 3 4 of ® % ' a ul • eaa 'ae °ems: 5 recrratn � pr v 7 A. Fee Payment Alternative: 8 1. Approval of Fee Payment Alternative: The City Council shall, upon 9 recommendation of the Park Board, determine the acceptability of a 10 developer's payment of fees in lieu of the land dedication requirement of this 11 section. 12 2. Calculation of Fees: The City Council shall annually establish an acreage 13 acquisition " cost figure to be used in calculating park fees. This 1Cdetermination shall be based on a reasonable study and investigation 1 performed t�� 3 Eby an independent registered land 16 appraisal firm as to the average fair market value of 17 acreage in the City. This figure shall be the acreage cost under which all park 18 fees are calculated for the fiscal year. 19 a. Residential Dwelling Unit Fees: The fee payment alternative for 20 residential development shall be calculated by dividing the 21 determined cost of one(1)acre of land by twenty-five-(-2-5) 22 for a resulting fee per residential dwelling unit. 23 b. Non-Residential Development Fees:The fee payment alternative for 24 non-residential development shall be calculated by dividing the 25 determined cost of one(1)acre of land by 26 for a resulting fee per non-residential acre cost, or prorated portion 27 thereof. In the event the non-residential development is less than 28a$ ' acres, the total acreage, net of perimeter L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\DRAFT7.WPD 'SG - Co L, 6 1 right-of-way dedications, shall be divided by 23 o determine the 2 prorated fee payment. 3 3. Collection of Fees: No building permit shall be issued nor shall any Y 4 i construction be allowed to h gin until payment of any fees required by this 5 section has been made. 6 B. Physical or Equipment Improvements to Parks 7 1. Compatibility with Park Master Plan: A developer may have the option 8 of improving existing facilities within municipal parks or improving 9 dedicated park land in lieu of park land dedication or payment of cash, based 10 on recommendations made in the Parks,Recreation, and Open Space Master 11 Plan. Should any of these options be exercised, the municipality and the 12 developer shall,prior to initiation of work on such improvements, enter into 13 an agreement for credit of expenses for authorized park improvements. In no case shall the municipality be required to reimburse the developer if he 1 chooses to improve parklands at an amount greater than required. Such a 16 proposed agreement to provide facility improvements in lieu of dedication 17 shall be submitted in writing with the application for any required Concept 18 Plan or Site Plan. In the event that no Concept Plan or Site Plan is required, 19 the agreement shall be submitted with the application for the preliminary plat. 20 21 7.06 PRIVATE PARKS: 22 ti e !,e b 23t ti e€` Y os pia e�� r " @� ' $ �8 ��®�� ag i- 1 �e 4 � 9PW� ��4,��'t�`e �Q�9��Q �-± & E1B 8 24 �¢I H ' d° ° e ' E. �� csta ° 25 It d "s "mom �� t s a a o .� 'S � J �'6 T e „6:� e '6'ir � p. �i �6 6i a ' ...-.•�`a;,,.,.a sr�` , r.',:. 26 reed o ' x& *sa mOxes tl an 5 e to al. . a 27 open sp e d di ur ent. 2 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTIPARK DED\DRAFr7.WPD (re 7 1 7.07 APPROVAL PROCESS: 2 A. Land Dedications Via-Flat: 3 1. Park Board Recommendation: The Director of Parks and Recreation or r 4 their designee shall may report to the Park Board regarding any park land 5 dedication issues arising from development applications submitted to the City 6 for approval.The Park Board shallW then make a formal recommendation 7 to the Planning and Zoning Commission to accept or refuse any proposed 8 dedicated park land prior to the Commission's action on the plat 9 development. 10 2. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and 11 Zoning Commission shall consider the recommendation of the Park Board in 12 determining the acceptability of any land dedications proposed on any 13 � . The Commission recommendation shall then be forwarded to the City Council for final approval where applicable. 1 3. . �'rm -. . omssird€ t - �, d 'zf � atr it::‘ r to 16 0 1'''' d ' 'u : r` ,, rr a 44. , , ` rai,t , ,, .-fe", :i is 17 htiv yaq, ,ytc i7ik a^• v4 _ :'s °i: :`r" ?9t,$ •z e cgat $ ',,:‘: 18 19 B. Fee Payments in Lieu of Dedication and/or Facilities Improvements: . 20 1. Park Board Recommendation: The Park Board shall make a formal 21 recommendation to the City Council as to the acceptability of any proposed 22 alternatives to park land dedication. ; 23 2. City Council Consideration: Upon receiving a formal recommendation 24 from the Park Board,the City Council shall enter into an agreement with the 25 developer for the provision of dedicated park land, fees in lieu of dedication, 26 facilities construction or improvement, or a combination thereof as outlined 27 below. 2C a. Developer's Agreements: Developer's Agreements between the City L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\DRAFT7.WPD 9 & 4 L 8 1 and the developer shall include the following requirements as 2 applicable: 3 (1) Boundary Corners Established: Each corner of the park 4 land to be dedicated shall be permanently monumented with 5 3/4" iron pins set in concrete. These shall be located and 6 identified on a recordable plat or land survey completed by a 7 land surveyor registered in the State of Texas and provided to 8 the City by the Owner and/or Developer. 9 (2) Utility Extensions to Park: A minimum size of 6" water 10 main and sanitary sewer, where available, shall be extended 11 to the park, in location(s) specified by the Director of Public 12 Works. 13 (3) Short-term Maintenance: The Owner and/or Developer agree that no construction materials shall be disposed of or 1 deposited within the park by its contractor, subcontractors, 16 employees or agents at any time while the subdivision is 17 being built. If materials are deposited or disposed of within 18 the park, the Owner and/or Developer shall be required to 19 remove these materials within 72 hours of written notice by 20 the City. Before the City accepts this land, the Developer 21 shall remove all trash and dead trees. 22 23 7.08 USE OF FUNDS: 24 A. Fund Established: Funds received by the City pursuant to this Section will be 25 deposited in a special fund dedicated to the accumulation of monies required by this 26 section. 27 B. Permitted Expenditures: Monies placed in this fund may be expended only for the 2 purchase, lease, or other acquisition of park and open space areas by the City of L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\DRAFT7.WPD Cie 9 1 Southlake, the improvement and site preparation of such areas and sites, the 2 extension of utilities to or within such sites, the installation of landscaping, play 3 equipment or recreation improvements on such sites, and/or attendant engineering r 4 and planning costs associated with such park development. 5 C. Inappropriate Expenditures: Monies placed in this fund may not be utilized for 6 any other general business activity of the City or for maintenance of park facilities. 7 D. Authorization for Use of Funds: All expenditures from this fund shall be made in 8 accordance with the City's Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan and shall 9 be approved by the City Council after a formal recommendation of the Park Board. C LACTYDOCS\ORD\DRAF \PARK DED\DRAFT7.WPD g6, , i O 10 1 These appendices are not considered a part of this ordinance and may be revised or updated as necessary by the City Staff. 2 3 APPENDIX 11 4 Guidelines for Park Land Dedication 5 r (Approved by Park Board 5/12/97) 6 7 A. Land dedication or otherwise set aside for open space and park and recreational areas shall be of 8 such size, dimensions, topography and general character as is reasonably required for the type of 9 use necessary to meet the demand and need of future residents, e.g., open space, linear space, 10 trails, active recreation for team or individual sports, playground, etc. 11 12 B. Natural areas or flood plains which provide unique opportunities may be included in areas 13 dedicated or otherwise set aside or reserved for open space or linear greenbelts. In considering 14 any area for dedication which,does not meet the standards of this ordinance and where the 15 ordinance allows the municipality to employ its discretion, the following may be considered: 16 17 1. Preserve area of unique natural beauty, area possessing unique natural features, or other 18 ecologically valuable areas. 19 20 2. Facilities may be developed in partial fulfillment of required parkland dedication. 21 2 3. Whether the area is proposed to be contiguous to an existing or proposed school site. 4. A combination of land dedication and fees paid in lieu of a portion of the land dedication. 25 26 5. Where developments are contiguous, two or more required dedications may be combined 27 to form a single, viable park area. 28 29 6. Acreage dedication which would expand existing parks or recreation facilities. 30 31 7. An applicant may transfer the required parkland in a subdivision to another location owned 32 by the same applicant within the City of Southlake with the consent of the City Council. (kirl L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFIIPARK DED\DRAFT7.WPD • 11 • 2 SECTION 2 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or 3 refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance 4 shall be fined not more than gi WOO) for each offense. Each day that a 5 violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 6 7 SECTION 3 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the 8 City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with 9 the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances 10 are hereby repealed. 11 12 SECTION 4 It is the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, 13 paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, 14 paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or 15 decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any 16 remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same 17 would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any 18 such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 19 2 SECTION 5 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place 2 for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and 23 if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation 24 of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the 25 official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by 26 Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. 27 28 SECTION 6 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to publish this 29 ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative 30 provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without 31 further proof than the production thereof. 32 33 SECTION 7 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage 34 and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 L:\CTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFT\PARK DED\DRAFT7.WPD � C7 - I '- 12 1 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 2 , 1997. 3 4 5 A 6 MA:YOR 7 8 ATTEST: 9 10 11 CITY SECRETARY 12 13 14 15 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 16 , 1997. 20 MAYOR 21 22 ATTEST: 23 24 25 CITY SECRETARY 26 27 28 29 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 30 31 32 City Attorney 33 34 Date: 35 36 ADOPTED: 37 38 EFFECTIVE: (ire' LACTYDOCS\ORD\DRAFTWARK DED\DRAFT7.WPD � � j l � .v �.• �. ��.. , a W n4_Ltu� c1,4 �G I YJ10D - to( 4C1 G1(O NU.l�l + OC Y-1 T-96 YHU 1 2 :Sa PM Fri 1 S e2 P g5., C4 WORKS 972 335 5524 v.02 AREA PARK FEES AND PARKLAND DEDICATION SEPTEMBER, 1996 COMMii1yITY MAINFSAMUFAZ GENERAL COMMENTS ADDISON None No dedication of land or park fee is now required. ARLINGTON $500 No dedication of land is now required. ALLEN $130.00-SF This fee is for each dwelling unit $110.00-MF submitted through the platting process. BEDFORD None No dedication of land or park fee is now required. L CARROLLTON $300.00 This fee is for each dwelling unit submitted through the platting process. CEDAR HILL $250.00 Through the platting process, one acre of land is required for each 100 units proposed. COLLEYVILLE $310.00 Through the platting p mg process, one acre of land is requhred for each 114 dwelling units proposed. COPPELL $1,285.00 Through the platting process, one acre of land is required for each 100 units proposed. DALLAS None No dedication or land or park fee is currently required. tt-ti -- -- - - av .♦ . v. rwGG . Ga-, rGr CJ10J 011 tiGl Gl(J IVU•£ L rekl.) OCT-17-96 THU 12 :53 PM FRISCOO PUBLIC WORKS 972 335 5524 D_ 04 (16..e PARK FEE SURVEY SEPTENISER, 1996 PAGE 2 DENTON None Parkland is acquired through voluntary contribution by the developer. DESOTO $300 Through the platting process, 5 acres of land is required for each 1000 residents proposed. FARMERS BRANCH None No dedication of land or park fee is now required. FRISCO $300.00 Through the platting P g process, 1 acre of park land is required for each 100 dwelling units proposed. FLOWER MOUND $750.00 Through the planing process, one acres of land is required for each 100 units proposed. FORT WORTH None Through the platting process, 2.5 acres of park land is required for each 1.000 proposed residents. GARLAND •None No dedication of park land or park fee is now required. GRAND PRAIRIE None No dedication of land or park fee is now required. GRAPEVINE $1,416.00 Per unit cost for R-5.0 zoning $1,146.00 Per unit cost for R-7.5 zoning $1.071.00 Per unit cost for R-12.5 zoning $ 807.00 Pcr unit cost for R-20 zoning IRVING None No dedication of land or park fee is currently assessed L aV ca JV A. • a S..♦ i 1 Vl IIV• VV aL'-1 II I VLVJ Val -vG♦ G�I.J I.V.LL1 1 VV`1 OCT-1 7-9 6 U p2 :02 PM FRjsCCO .PUBLIC WORKS 972 335 3324 P.01 PARK FEE SURVEY SEPTEMBER, 1996 PAGE 3 v LEWISVILLE $250.00 Through the platting process. one acre of land is required for each 100 units proposed MCKINNEY Varies Through the platting process, 220 square feet per capita is required for each proposed development. The fee will vary depending upon the appraised land value of the proposed propertY• NORTH RICHLAND HILLS None No dedication of land or park fee is now required. PLANO 467.47 S.F. Through the development process. $323.96 M.F. the and plan will dictate what park dedication or linear park impact fee will be assessed. THE COLONY None No dedication of land or park fee is currently assessed PARKSRVY.96 (916 i ..... L ..o. ! • ,. ..:, al cn as us co us .e r.WI V 04 63 r.ca t. ...04 us us ,- a,is a*r,r.F7 go cn c, 0- v.el 04 CI v 0 1... .- 40 04 P.;33 z g 111 ci 0 ci cS ..ci ci cS cS ci cS ci ci ci C7 ci ci ci .z ci ci ci ci ci cs ci cS ci ci 0 ci.0 cS ci ci ci cS ci • 4 j1 1.•-• `. . u E C L e ck. I'S VI el el ra at Si Ir l- CO CO C)el 1...63 CA v el 04 ...in el el P.P.0 to N 01 CO 01 V in.-..0 P.63 10 0 al al if CV el va 01 el v ..e 40 40 el el P- 01 el el .-en el el ul P.40 el CA f:!f',.if 7 CO 7 .0 V CV 01 4.4 CS 0 1- - •ct fu .. O. ....0 8 I I I imammasin Eammumminimumimmemminmana 2L,, --ad.i V 0 Si 443 5i ci a a a r..:g a a ir;a a OS 04:e:0 0 0 GS ci e-ei 1.4 ad RS QS el si ii E t 61 .. . a. _ 4 Ia a) as p. a N, 11 Ir‘r,t3 ul CO CO eli1P 04 Ir de-.-04 03 V 03 II Ps e.2 el..40 0 CO C)04 01 el en 63 0 g ir q ellitl.,P.41 0 v.0 CD el 10 40 01 al an c!CM 04 el v.CV ut al.-an P.0 4. 40 04 al 0 el el = = C) SP c co .-$i r-ri..:ei oi ri r:..: 4 1E5 e'ra.o3f 4c3i 4rr0ni C.I-.4o1i1(o..434f rrC.:...4oC,-%Ift rcC.o-43t CoVOIi 64 C83.u.3:m a0C3 Ce'Mti r3eUl,4 :,1,cf14,RoHaa1ol0C" al0UC d•-. . .03 1131213 ' V2 138r311 ' 11 ! ai1 ;1 N. 4 2w 0, s.0 1 N A el e 0C , 4 g;.ilA 0 2 3 g U 2 A 1Z i 3 2 1 4+., a) 9 0 4rvi4 .- 21 ,CD , v-.17 ct 4 4 II ;44 40 GI 44 44 44 4 SI 44 4 N* Ce 7 oa s .:.s . 0 C3 C3 C) C)CD CI V3 0 el C2 0 0 ,r C2 It...C)Ul C2 CD C3 40.0 I,. .-el um al CO'V.C3 C)0 CI WI g 1 s.. in el eai ci 0 ei cri cri ei 6.1.CS tri ri old c4 If C4 cri c:i DS cc;e4 e-4 ci cci.-0i.-ai sr r:cri c4.-mi 4. Cti ill N el 04 .. C) (0.....Cl ...el V 40 if v- 1 44 4- .-v 04.-4.- ..4.4 P.el 0 ..... 40 a. 15 li U.I > 0 •-• s- Ct el 4- CV .- .- Cl .... T. cr 0 tr 2 11. 12 4.-sc. CS •= E ti 03 U.I a E ,-go go go 63 40 01 C3 40 0 if el II r) 4.4 01 ... 01 62 VI .- 44- sr el 63 04 CV 04 0 I i E. e Ei ea 04 .4- .- I'4 (it o a ,... i•-• 0 cu . tr. :7! = E IL ILI ._ . 0 4. C4 40 0 6 0 10 0 0 co 04 to el to el •-• to 1 .-to 01 in at et 40 0 Of 441 01 in el P.0 C) C3 Os ....01 F... ii . C ul In 0) CI P.in Cl1 NI' to0v VI V el 04 ul el CV in to r-r.0 44, 4 r.. ..in P.es 0 CV atCO VI el •-•el F. •••P.V/4•1 40 N49.'11:CO ts .- IN Cs4 GIN .- 00•-. V etrptoNcl CUP4 /- Pi s- P. 01 CV c- s- ei el. S 0 Z.; a = 0 . h R 4 . u 1- a • O. 1! .0 c) C) C3 CD C3 C) CD 0 0 47 C)(7 (7 C)C3 C3 C3 0 C) C7 0 (7 0 caro C) CD C3 0 C5 C3 0(7 C3 0 0 C3 0 .k in C3 C3 U1 0 US 0 0 in 10 in in 0 in 0 U)C)C3 C3 C7 0 CI ul 441<3 in C3 40 in in ul C,43 in C3 441 0 C v ca 447 0 go 0. ... v..0..go 40 p.0 63 441 r) 40 en,.- co CI el,el Cliff 04.40 Ul.63 WI C3 It CD Cn CI et 0 () 0 cri t.:cc;ci ei to at 0 V UiCiui eirZaitri ri VI 0;ci ui 01 Of CV P:..Cl .F.=e 11 4 .- .- e , i -s a040 N 4 - l P.fi el v F)e 0) ) el l .- el 0 .- N Ul el C4 40 0 el 01ei to o 0 1 ei Z 0 CL f .17), - _ I § 11, . P .g Z L a.. 0 fi ' etoefiel 5.14 a 40 = I*2.2 43421.6A -518clithilliiEg_Olkag •— cI — 5 To ,t.f .EE .08• TiVieg -sT6ETieF- Tio' gn .EIT3 2 6u1" ...,Swaa .284E TS • • 1996 Me• tro-Area Survey '" Park Acres Per 1.000 Citizens S 10 IS 20 2S 30 l I II I I McKinney I Highland Village Mineral Wells Grapevine Fort Worth Southlake Mansfield Lewisville Carrollton Plano Dallas Euless Grand Prairie Benbrook N Richland Hills Garland —( Allen - Mesquite Irving _, - Desoto Demon Keller Colleyville Rowlett Arlington The Colony Hurst • Flower Mound Average- 14.80 Lancaster • Highland Park 111111.111.. Sherman Everman Duncanville Bedford Haltom City • • L �V� 'S (111m.'' • Page 2 These considerations are discussed below. Mark Mills, Administrative Intern, conducted a park land dedication fee survey of area cities. The results are shown below: 4 Parkland Dedication Fees: Survey of Colleyville and the Surrounding Area City Ordinance Inception Ordinance Acres/Unit Fee/Unit In Collected to Status LieU Of Date Bedford No n/a N Coffeyville Yes 1991 C 0.0088 5310.11 S240,603 0,1 Euless No n/a N Grapevine Yes 1985 A • ., "'5800,000 Hurst No n/a N Keller'••• Yes 1989 A 0.0151 S375.00 S572.400 N. Richland No n/a C Hills - - L, Southlake Yes 1990 R O.0200 5500.00 5817,000 C-Currently considering a park land dedication fee A-As stands;no changes currently being considered N-Not currently considering a park land dedication fee R-Currently considering redesigning the existing ordinance • City of Grapevine requires the dedication of 300 sq.ft. of park land per lot • City of Grapevine requires payment in lieu of park land if a minimum 30.000 square foot park can not be dedicated. This payment is based on zoning and ranges from S807-S1416 per'dwelling unit • Amount shown collected was an approximation provided by City of Grapevine City of Keller requires a donation of 1 acre for every 66 units in lieu of the fee for subdivisions which fall within their proposed trail system City of Southlake currently charges S500 per roof top in a residential subdivision;they also assess a fee of S500 per acre for commercial property. They require a donation of 1 acre of park land for every 50 units of residential and 1 acre of park land per 50 acres of commercial For more detailed information on the Grapevine, Keller and Southlake ordinances, please see Exhibit B. L City of Southlake,Texas (417 MEMORANDUM May 16, 1997 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim Lenoir, Director of Parks and Recreation RE: Park Dedication Ordinance The Parks and Recreation Board discussed Monday,May 12 the P&Z action on the Park Dedication Ordinance. Attached is a matrix outlining the policy differences between the current ordinance,Park Board's recommendation and P&Z's recommendation. The Park Board wishes to present to City Council their reasoning for their recommendation. Please put an item on the May 20, City Council agenda for the Park Dedication Ordinance. If you have any questions please call me at 481-5581 extension 757. KML g -c2O i (khope PARK DEDICATION ORDINANCE COMPARISON Policy Issues Existing Ordinance Park Board P&Z Recommendation Recommendation Park Land 1 to 50 units 1 to 25 units 1 to 50 units Dedication per residential unit Park Land 1 to 50 acres 1 to 25 acres 1 to 50 acres Dedication per non- residential acreage Fee Calculation Tax Value Fair Market Value Fair Market Value Private Parks up to 50% credit ( no credit may request up to 50% credit (blow 2� -ao • MAY-16-1997 11: 10 FIELDING.BAFRET 8 TAYLOR 8173324741 P.02/07 • . • ORDINANCE NO. b 7� _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ANNEXING THE HEREINAFTER MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED TERRITORY GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS AN AREA COMPRISING APPROXIMATELY 480 ACRES ABUTTING STATE HIGHWAY 114, KNOWN AS"SOLANA",AND AN AREA COMPRISING APPROXIMATELY 27 ACRES ABUTTING THAT PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF SOUTH AKE, TEXAS,AND EXTENDING THE BOUNDARY LIMITS OF SAID CITY SO AS TO LNCLUDE SAID TERRITORY WITHIN SAID CITY LIMITS AND GRANTING TO ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY ALL OF THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF OTHER CITIZENS AND BINDING SAID OWNERS AND OTHER PERSONS WITHIN THE ANNEXED AREA BY ALL THE ACTS,ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS OF SAID CITY;APPROVING A SERVICE PLAN FOR SUCH TERRITORY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (ire I:\files\s1a k e\s nnex2 t i\ca p t i c n "? IP MAY-16-1997 11: 12 FIELDING.Bc4 ET 8 TP•LCR 81tisd4741 P.03' 7 SERVICE PLAN Municipal services to the following area known as the Solana Project and generally described as: Parcel A - Being all that 251.757 acre tract of land situated in the J.B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, the T.W. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1107, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract 1015, the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, and the C.M.Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510,Tarrant County,Texas and more particularly described as the Westlake/Southlake Park,Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Volume 388-214, Pages 78 and 79, Map & Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, including the replat of Lots 1R and 2R, BIock 2 of the Westlake/Southiake Park, Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No. 283, Map and Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Parcel B - Being a acre tract of land situated in the William Pea Survey, Abstract Number 2025, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 1045, Denton County, Texas; the J. Henry Survey, Abstract Number 724, Tarrant County, Texas, the same being Abstract Number 528, Denton County,Texas; the W.Medlin Survey,Abstract Number 1958,Tarrant County, (re Texas and the C.M. Throop Survey, Abstract Number 1510,Tarrant County, Texas, all located in northern Tarrant County and southern Denton County, Texas. This tract of land embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter referred to as IBM, as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1728; Volume 7373, Page 2080; Volume 7351, Page 1940; Volume 7864, Page 142; Volume 7926, Page 1452; Volume 7940, Page 171; Volume 7940, Page 167, and also being a portion of those tracts of land described in deeds to IBM as recorded in Volume 7376, Page 1737; Volume 7376, Page 2087; and Volume 7376, Page 1765,Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Parcel C - Being all that' certain tract of land in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1958, and the C.M Throop Survey, Abstract 1510, both in Tarrant County, Texas. This tract of land embraces the tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines,hereinafter referred to as IBM,and recorded in Volume 8795, Page 553, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Parcel D-BEING a tract of land in the T.W.MANN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 1107 and the C.M. THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1510, the JAMES B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1134, the U.P. MARTEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1015 and the W. MEDLIi 1 SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1958, Tarrant County, Texas. tofiles\slake\aanecui\servicc.001 Ya;e 1 MAY-16-1997 11: 10 FIELDING,BFFRET 8 TAYLCP 8173324?41 P.84/Er7 shall be furnished after the effective date of annexation byor on behalf of the e (Sty of Southlake, Texas, at the following levels and in accordance with the following schedule: 1. Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of annexation the City of Southlake will provide the following services to the newly annexed area: A. Police Protection The City of Southlake, Texas, and its Police Department will provide police protection to the newly annexed tract at the same or similar level of service now being provided to the areas of the City of Southlake, Texas,with similar topography, land use and population within the newly annexed area. B. fire Protection and Ambulance Service The City of Southlake, Texas, and its Fire Department will provide fire protection and ambulance service to the newly annexed tract at the same or similar level of service now being provided to other areas of the City of Southlake, Texas,with similar topography, land use and population within the City. Further, the City of Southlake Fire Department and ambulance service will respond to all dispatched calls and requests for service or assistance within the newly annexed area.' - CI C. Solid Waste Collection At the present time the City of Southlake, Texas, is using a designated, specific contractor for collection of solid waste and refuse within the city limits of the City of Southlake, Texas. Such contract for solid waste collection is with Laidlaw. Upon payment of any required deposits and the agreement to pay lawful service fees and charges, solid waste collection will be provided to citizens in the newly annexed area to the extent that the City's contractor has access to the area to be serviced. D. Maintenance of Water and Waste Water Facilities Any and all water or waste facilities owned or maintained by the City of Southlake, Texas, at the time of the annexation shall continue to be maintained by the City of Southlake, Texas. Any and all water or waste water facilities which may be acquired subsequent to the annexation of the proposed area shall be maintained by the City of Southlake, Texas, to the extent of its ownership. It is the intent of the City of Southlake to maintain all water and waste water facilities in the annexed area that are not within the service area with any other water or waste water utility. E. Maintenance of Roads and Streets C\az sls ke annexati\ser.ice.001 Page 2 MAY-16-1997 11:11 FIELDING,BAR ET 8 TAYLCP 8173324741 P.0b/e? Any and all roads, streets or all which edicated to the City of Southlake, Texas, or which are owned by he City of Southlake, Tdexas, shall be znahitained to the same degree and extent that other roads, streets, and all alleyways are maintained in areas with similar topography, Iand use and population density. Any and all lighting of roads, streets and alleyways which may be positioned in a right-of-way, roadway or utility company easement shall be maintained by the applicable utility company servicing the City of Southlake, Texas, pursuant to the rules, regulations and fees of such utility. F. Maintenance of Pules, Playgrounds and Swimming Paola The City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, is not aware of the existence of any parks, playgrounds or public swimming pools now located in the area proposed for annexation. In the event any such parks, playgrounds or swimming pools do eXist and are public facilities,the City of Southlake,Texas,will maintain such areas to the same extent and degree that it maintains parks, playgrounds and swimming pools and other similar areas of the City now incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas. G. Maintenance of any Pabliely Owned Facility. Building or Municipal Service The City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, is not aware of the existence of any publicly owned facility,building or other municipal service now located in the area proposed (isto, for annexation. In the event any such publicly owned facility, building or municipal service does exist and is a public facility, the City of Southlake, Texas, will maintain such area to the same extent and degree that it maintain publicly owned facilities, buildings or municipal services of the City now incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas. 2. Program for construction or acquisition of any capital improvements necessary for providing municipal services for the area: A. jn General 1. The City will initiate the construction or acquisition of any capital improvements required by this service plan within two years after the effective date of the annexation and will substantially complete the work within 4-1/2 years. 2. The City policy for extending water and waste water service is to-extend service on an as required basis when development applications or subdivision plats are submitted to the City in accordance with the City's subdivision and development ordinances. 3. Landowners may be required to fund capital improvements necessary to provide service in a manner consistent with Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code. Nothing in this service plan shall be interpreted to require a landowner within the newly annexed area to fund capital improvements necessary to provide municipal services in a \Gies\slake\anncaati\servicc.Cot . Page 3 ' MAY-16-1997 11:11 FIELDING.BARRET 8 TAYLC 8173324741 P.06/07 (a.e' manner inconsistent with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, unless otherwise agreed to by the landowner. 4. This Service Plan shall have no effect on the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No. 1. B. Police Protection. Fire Pmtection & Solid Wale Cgilectioq • The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, finds and determines it to be unnecessary to acquire or construct any capital improvements for the purposes of providing police protection, fire protection or solid waste collection. The City Council finds and determines that it has at the present time adequate facilities to provide the same type, kind and level of protection and service which is presently being administered to other areas already incorporated in the City of Southlake, Texas, with the same or similar topography, land use and population density. C. Water and Waste Water Faeilities The City of Southlake, Texas, believes that given the current state of development in the area to be annexed, adequate City water mains exist for points of connection for serviceable extensions to provide water service pursuant to the City's standard water (be extension policies now in existence or as may be amended by the City Council. if further development and construction of subdivisions commence within this property, water mains and waste water facilities of the City will be extended by the property owner or developer in accordance with provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance and other applicable policies, ordinances, and regulations. City participation in the costs of these extensions shall be in accordance with applicable City policies, ordinances, and regulations. Such extensions will commence within two years from the effective date of the annexation ordinance, and/or upon development, whichever occurs later_ D. Rgads and Streets • The City of Southlake,Texas,with a cooperative effort of the City's designated utility company, will undertake to provide the same degree of road and street lighting as is provided in areas of similar topography, land use and population density within the present corporate limits of the City of Southlake, Texas. Maintenance of properly dedicated roads and streets will be consistent with the maintenance provided by the City to other roads and streets in areas of similar topography, Iand use and subdevelopment of the annexed property. Developers will be required pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, to provide internal and peripheral streets and to construct those streets in accordance with the specifications required by the City of Southlake, Texas, for a properly dedicated street. (:Wes\slake\aime:ati\scrvice.001 Page 4 (/• K- 5 MAY-16-1997 11:12 FIELDIPG.BARRET 8 TAYLOR 8173324741 P.07i0? E. u I : r 1 - P Meinigninst_erAnLatizriabliauleso FaizOity. Building or Service To the extent that it becomes necessary because of development demnds,population growth, and a bona fide need, the City Council of the Cityof Southlake, undertake to provide any such facility which it deems necessary to adequatelyTpr � the health and safety of the citizens of the newlyincorporated area the standard for considerations of topography, rporated based upon standard pogr phy, land use and population density. SPECIFIC FINDINGS The City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas finds and determines that this proposed Service Plan will not provide any fewer services, and It will not provide a lower level of service in the area proposed to be annexed than were in existence in the proposed area at the time immediately preceding the annexation process. Because of the differing characteristics of topography,land utilization and population density, the service levels which may ultimately be provided in the newly annexed area may differ somewhat from services provided other areas of the City of Southlake, Texas. These differences are specifically dictated because of differing characteristics of the property and the City of Southlake, Texas, will undertake to perform consistent with this contract so as to provide this newly annexed area with the same type, kind and quality of service presently enjoyed by the citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, who reside in areas of similar topography, land utilization and population. APPROVED on this the day of 1997. CITY OF SOUTII.A,f,, TEXAS Rick Stacey, Mayor ATTEST: Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary EViles\slake\annexm Acnice.001 Pace S TOTAL P.07 THE SOUTHLAKE PARTNERSHIP .4 i 0 too 200 400 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE 1"- 200* APPROVED FINAL PLAT LOT i, BLOCK 1 ROC K ENBA U GH EL EM ENTAR Y SCHOOL ZONED PUD ADDITION APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT TIMARRON ADDITION PHASE FIVE WESTERRA TIMARRON LP Vol. t261 P BeocE 57 ZONED PUD i r SAXON TIMARRON ADDITION, BRYSON SQUARE ,PHAS po k 55 cAB.a, SLIDE 3434 ASHLEIGH LANE COMMOFGREJEN "The actual width and location of drainage easements shall be determined upon future submittal of revised preliminary or final plat of Lot 1, Block 1.". ' OAKCREST CT l3 L O G' TIMARRON ADDITION BRENWYCK PHASE 2 CAB. A DURHAM CTr SLIDE 2152 COMMON GNi N . 36 RE ZONED PUD 3z 133 ty ZONED PUD V1 00; WESTERRA TIMARRON LP Vol. 12612, Pg.1596 ZONED AG C.A. PRADE,JR. Vol.3835, Pg.356 ZONED 4G /o I 20 Ge isr ns� THE LAKES OF LA PALOMA PRELIMINARY PLAT LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK I, W. W. RUCKER ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKEIN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEiNG A TRACT IN THE O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY ABSTRACTNO.899 A COMMON GREEN N0.36, IN BLOCK 12, OF __. vICINITY MAP TIMARRON ADDITION .,-BRENWYCK, PHASE 2, OF A175 RECORD IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2152, PLAT k RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. 2 L_of $ 53.09 Acs. May 1997 Z,4 Yes aF Gift Pj-,0 ->ej .cam Q 1.Al Oa�drCo''J�/o�E9 itative_t aril Use Sch_edui 49 3so. S7 Ocdcdfio� .36 ' Existing Prop.; Exist? ng Prop. L n s L11114 US2 itgrieu tural Low Density Res. AG SF 30 S .AG Anticipilted completion date: September, 1997. U LLIAM 9 ZEfA ?J"t:!?R 1311, S01IT11 CAP -POLL SOOMAJCE, TEXAS 76092 (417) 481-1185 .. 75 #Iof A of Gross Density Net 12tj knits r pyLAc. Acrt4ge 7 2 53.09 .037 53.05 tllCtiAEL s CAROL RUCKER •lli(}9 nARVIST OW111• DRIVE GRAPEVIVE, TEXAS,760S1 (R17}451-2291r - PROPERTY DESCR,IET_IONT BEING A TRACT IN THE 0. W. KNIGHT SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 899, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING THE TRACT DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 10423, PAGE 1170, AND COMMON GREEN NO 36, IN BLOCK 12, OF TIMARRON ADDITION, BRENWYCK, PHASE 2, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, AS SHOWN ON A PLAT OF RECORD IN CABINET A. SLIDE 2152, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID.TRACT AND COMMON GREEN BEING CONTIGUOUS ARE CONSIDERED FOR THE PURPOSES HEREIN AS ONE TRACT AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY.. METESAND BOUNDS AS - FOLLOWS: - BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of the tract descrihed in said potnt Vol. 10423, Pge. 1170, above referenced, being the Southeast corner of Lot 34, illock 12,of Timarron Addition, Bren'yck, Phase 2, of record in Cabinet A, Slide 21529 Plat Records, Tarrant County Texas ; THENCE N.Oo-15'-00" W. 157..03 feet along the West line of the 'Rucker tract to a point for corner, -being the Southeast corner of Common Green No. 36,of said Addition; THENCE N. 640-44'-33" W. 21.01 feet along the Southerly lit of said Conmon Green No.36,to the Northwest corner of same in the Easterly line,of a cut -de -sac at the East 'end of. Durham Court; • THENCE Northerly with the perimeter of said cul-de-sac, 50 feet, being a curve to the left +ipvAn a radius of E.42.40 feet and whose long chord be4rs,N.-O$-11'-22" a distance of• 43.78'feet to b poi -At in some for the -Northeast corner of said Common Green No.3t; THENCE N. 650-06'-15 "E. 20.51 feet to a point in the West lin# of said Rucker tract; . THENCE N. Oo-15'-00" W. ( Base Bearing- Record) 2085.97 of said along said West line to the Northwest corner Rucker tract; THENCE N. 810-31'-00" E. 977.00 feet to a point for the Northerly northeast corner of said .Rucker tract; THENCE. South Z,416.70 feet to an ell corner of said Rucker 'the lakes of'ta tract, being the Southwest corner of Paloma Addition to the'City of SOLlthlake; THENCE East along tha South line of said addition Easterly Continuing in all 953.60 feet to the _ .,and Southeast corner of said Rucker tract in the center of South Car►%o)1 Road; THENCE South along the center of said road 30.00 feet to a point in salve for corner; THENCE S. E39o-59'-16along line traltOtoatheePOINTOF BEGINNING, and of said Ruckerc containing 53.09 acres; REC'9 111AY 1 21997 EIP5 ® —j EIF5 (TYP) IN NO - ��........E'......■.......■■■- ....■■■- ................ ■.■■■. ........................�� r 1 moo'-o" I �DkE-)T ELE\b�TION SCALE: n A l l l l l I I A -/ T 1 1 = I"IV VVLr�I\ LEI\IVI\ � I I I 4q'-O" NORTH I:,-�E ELEVI4TION ✓ SCALE: ,SII_,�_�� 5 n to IL tf) ii IZ � w I 1 ILz r O N W _ I I 1- >Y p ,n 71 z O 0) MCDULAK t3KIGtc (I7rj 15'-4" SOUTH �5I-E ELEVAATION W ET SIC ELEVAATION SCALE: E l =3 TONE RICK TONE >=I=C i"Iv1JVLfiM G1CIC.it ( I T T) V. 14'-S" ') RECD MAY I g 1991 ■ G 1 CORGAN ASSOCIATES, INC 501 ELM STREET DALLAS, TEXAS 15202 21 4 748 2000 W _Ile N co a) O O V , CIO co T Q) co Cr%) V n, W OO co V W V co E � X E m ~ O V TEX,4� COMMERCE BANK, N.A. F.O.BOX 2C558 HOUSTON, TEXAS 7-T252 (71�) 21�-SOg2 210-2245 Job Date Drawn Check PRF Sheet Of 'L:-.: .11 yyyy�w 21m mtommry LIM LOT ! 366v3A LANDSCAPE, (L.5., TYPJ An Os L•Y, IN i OUT A i K - L }i t?; ItIUSTRlAL - . I A 1 �Y TOW 1D OC QL ! MOKAN •, .�.,:. ,�.' - _fib " TO �.r7 Ix !3s . W� <. Ktq tit. rb• T 0. t � � � 1• 0 ��' a. rat x s.• r � � � , t (j1 00 , � J -w BLOCK 8 No air -a r i x fib' O' T IN t = - 1 i LI PR0I9ITY LINE LOT 7 - 602s ,& Propose x _ s, ati ' E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. v (, LOOP w cn Y / SITE leZ ti O Q <[ u a� all VICINITY MAP NO SC.442 OWNER: TERRY 4UILKINSON 829-4690 SOUTHLAKE-,PROPERTIES, INC. DSO PARKVIEW LANE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 NOTES. SURVEY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN DATED 1/23/95 BY J.E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC. EXISTING ZONING - S-P-2 L.U.D. - MIXED. USE PROPOSED ZONING - S-P-2 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: LOT 1 - ,50% REQUIRED, 50% PROVIDED LOT 2 - 10% REQUIRED, 14% PROVIDED 1. LOT I C2 USES 2. LOT 2 - LIMITED I I USES RESTRICTED USE$ AS FOLLOWS: SELF STOWE/OFFICE W/UP TO 15% RETAIL OPERATIONS S.U.P. - OUTSIDE STORAGE S.U.P. - CARETAKER'S QUARTERS to 3. BUILDINGS 'A' AND 'S' TO BE ARTICULATED PER CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ZONING REQUIREMENTS. 4. LOT 2 IS WITHIN THE 65 "LDN' AND 75 "LDN" D/FW REGIONAL AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE AND MAY REQUIRE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS THAT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AIRPORT COMPATIBLE LAND USE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 479. 5. OUTSIDE STORAGE MAY BE REPLACED BY ADDITIONAL MINI WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS IN FUTURE. 6. BUILDINGS C.D.E. AND F WILL HAVE NO DOOR OPENINGS TO THE PERIMETER PROPERTY LINES. 0 CITY CASE NO. ZA97-047 Mu/ti-use Faci/fty for: SOUA THOMAS EASTER SURVEY Taxss 7.22 ACRES ABST. 474 READ [„AA 121997 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS TARRANT COUNTY No. 37434.GCD LNL- HD D/210 Lot I. Block A I 0 White Cha el Place Addition I Volume 3 8-I50. Page 37 sc C •as I L_ — S 8730'00"E 05/8' PF o Dedicatee S 89r30.00-E O J O W Q U -Q U � o m—� m r s I` U� I Q U f � I s � C CV .at! CN White Ch Court O i I /2- PS I r- Iffi -II 00 (C) < CV U IW 0 O Im Q_ +— u E �d C- c I� n a� U _c �i Lemial Garland Mantooth & Wife. Carol Ann Mantooth Volume 5414, Page 238 Sandra Kay Talley Volume 6488. Page 927 210.21' Lilac�- Vicinity Vicinity Map NOTES: I. "Selling a Portion of any lot within this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of state law and city ordinance and is sub Ject to fines and withholding of utilities and building Permits." 2. "The City of Southlake reserves the right to require minimum finish floor elevations on any lot contained within this addition. The minimum elevations shown are based on the most current information available at the time the Plat is filed and may be subject to change. Additional lots. other than those shown. J may also be subject to minumum f inish floor criteria." Scale F-50' 0 0 50 100 vo NOTE: The owners of all corner lots shall maintain o sight triangles in accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. ON O 0 Lot 23 T� Lot 22 Lot 21 Lot 20 Block 2 Timarron�R se One. Section One, The Hi Hands. A Cabinet A. Side 1014 OWNER/DEVELOPER JACK & BABBARA J. RUDDUCK 217 Lilac Lane Southlake. Texas 76092 - 9381 (817) 481-8332 SURVEYOR CLARENCE W. HART. R.P.L.S. Area Surveying Inc. 102 W. Trammell Street Fort Worth. Texas 76140 (817) 293-5684 Approved City of Southlake city Council Mayor City secretary SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION This is to certify that I. Clarence W. Hart. a registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas having Platted the above subdivision from an actual survey on the ground: and that all lot corners. and an le Points. and Points of curve shall be properly marked on t e round and that this plat correctlyP e Presents that surveymade b me or under m directioand supervision. y Y P Clarence W. Hart. R.P.L.S. Texas Registration No. 1600 t� c P r18T 9.. Q /IfHK k WT <7� sSa,Cpr�q. Approved City of Southlake Planning & Zoning Commission Chi man P & Z Secretary DEDICATION STATE Of TEXAS } COUNTY OF TARRANT } WHEREAS, Jack R. Rudduck and wife, Barbara J. Rudduck, are the owners of a tract of land situated in the O. N. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, Tarrant County, Texas, according to deed recorded in Volume 8727, Page 1007, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas,..and being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron pin found, said point being 2000.00 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Knight Survey, said point also being the Northwest corner of Lot 23, Block 2, Timarron, Phase One, Section One, The Highlands, according to plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1014, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North, along the West line of said Knight Survey, 829.50 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found in Lilac Lane; TX=CE.&wth 89 degrees 30'minutes 00 seconds East, along Lilac Lane 210.21 feet to a nail found for corner; THl*CE South, 927.66 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner in the North line of said Block 2, Timarron Addition; THENCE Nest, along said North line, 210.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4.00 acres,of land. NOW, THEREFORE, Know all men by these presents: THAT, WE, Jack R. Rudduck and wife, Barbara R. Rudduck, do hereby adopt this plat to be known As Lots 5 and 6, o. W. Knight Addition No. 899, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and we do hereby dedicate to the public's use the rights -of -way and easements shown hereon. WITNESS our hands at Southlake,.Texas, this the day of 1997. Jack R. Rudduck Barbara J. Rudduck STATE OF TEXAS } COUNTY OF TARRANT } • ,', BEFORE HE, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Jack R. Rudduck and wife, Barbaro R. Rudduck, known to me as the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. ' GIVEN UNDER my hand and seal of office this the day of 1997. Notary Public Plat Showing Lots 5 and 6 O.W. Knight Addition, No. 899 An Addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant Count y.Texas. Being 4.00 Acres in the 0. W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. March 1997 2 Lots Amended: May 1997 THS PLAT FILED N CABMT . SLIDE DATE ' Case No. ZA97-045 AREA SURVEYING, INC. ® AC6liicrca rroI cssional Land Surveyors 102 W. Trammon St. • Fort Worth, T*xas 76140 • (017)209-6664