The URL can be used to link to this page

2001-11-05 CC Packetf City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM October 30, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (ex. 1527) SUBJECT: Approval of amendment to the Library Loan Lengths Policy Action Requested: Approval of amendment to the Library Loan Lengths Policy. Background Information: The library staff and Library Board has reviewed the previously approved Library Loan Lengths Policy and submits the following amendment to City Council for review and approval. Amendment No. 1: Periodicals do not circulate. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Library Board reviewed and recommended approval at their October 3, 2001 meeting (6-0). Legal Review: Not Applicable . Alternatives: The City Council may ask for further changes in the policy. Supporting Documents: Copy of the proposed amendment to the Library Loan Lengths Policy. Staff Recommendation: City Council approval of amendment to the Library Loan Lengths Policy. KR Uq Policy: Source: Category: Effective Date: Southlake Public Library Board Policies and Procedures Manual Loan Lengths City Council Administration January 2, 2001 Statement of Purpose The purpose of this policy is to provide consistent guidance for the Southlake Public Library staff in loan lengths. Policy Statement Books 14 days New Books/Books on Tape 14 days (no renewal) Audiocassettes 7 days Videocassettes/CD-ROM 7 days Periodicals ;-day- -Do not circulate Reference Books Do not circulate A maximum limit of six items per cardholder will be imposed. City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM October 30, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xt. 1527) SUBJECT: Approval of amendment to the Library Borrower Privileges and Responsibilities Policy Action Requested: Approval of amendment to the Library Borrower Privileges and Responsibilities Policy. Background Information: The library staff and Library Board have reviewed the previously approved Library Borrower Privileges and Responsibilities Policy and submits the following amendment to City Council for review and approval. Amendment No. 1: Videocassette and DVD checkout will be limited to person's eighteen years and older. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Library Board reviewed and recommended approval at their October 3, 2001 meeting (6-0). Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: The City Council may ask for further changes in the policy. Supporting Documents: Copy of the proposed amendment to the Library Borrower Privileges and Responsibilities Policy. Staff Recommendation: City Council approval of the amendment to the Library Borrower Privileges and Responsibilities Policy. V Southlake Public Library Board Policies and Procedures Manual Policy: Borrower Privileges and Responsibilities Source: City Council Category: Administration Effective Date: January 2, 2001 Statement of Purpose The purpose of this policy is to provide consistent guidance for the Southlake Public Library staff in borrower privileges and responsibilities. Policy Statement The Southlake Public Library issues resident (free), city employee (free) and non-resident (fee) library cards. Requirement to obtain a resident (free) library card: A. Must be a resident of or a property owner in Southlake. B. Must present positive proof of residence address (no P.O. Box) or property ownership, such as real or personal property tax statement. C. Must complete and sign the application card. This card expires three years from date of issue. D. Any minor, as defined by the State of Texas, must have the signature of a parent or legal guardian on the application signed in the presence of a library staff member. Requirement to obtain a city employee (free) library card: A. Must be an active and current employee of the City of Southlake. B. Must present a current City of Southlake employee ID card. C. Must complete and sign the application card. This card expires one year from date of issue. The card is terminated upon employee resignation, retirement or termination. Requirement to obtain a non-resident (fee) library card: A. Must present positive proof of residence address (no PO Box). B. Must pay user fee as established by current City fee schedule. C. Must complete and sign the application card. This card expires one year from date of issue. D. Any minor, as defined by the State of Texas, must have the signature of a parent or legal guardian on the application signed in the presence of a library staff member. Library Borrower Privileges and Responsibilities Policy Page 2 Borrowers must be registered and must have a library card to borrow library materials. In order to renew a library card, patrons must produce identification and must clear all outstanding fees. New borrowers are limited to three items on the first visit. Videocassette and DVD checkout will be limited to person's eighteen years and older. Patrons who borrow materials from the Southlake Public Library are responsible for returning them in a timely manner and in the same condition. Any person who holds materials more than one circulation overdue or whose fees have accumulated to $5.00 or more will forfeit library privileges until materials are returned and fees are paid. :0 City of Southlake, Texas a MEMORANDUM October 30, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xt. 1527) SUBJECT: Approval of amendments to the Library Fees and Extended Fees Policy Action Requested: Approval of amendments to the Library Fees and Extended Fees Policy. Background Information: The library staff and Library Board have reviewed the previously approved Library Fees and Extended Fees Policy and submits to City Council the following amendments for review and approval. Amendment No. 1: Retail replacement cost of any item which is lost or damaged and for which a current price can be found. Replacement cost plus $10 processing fee. Amendment No. 2: Average replacement cost for any item which is lost or damaged beyond repair and for which a current price cannot be found. Replacement cost plus $10 processing fee. Amendment No. 3: If the replacement cost of an item is less than $10.00, the replacement cost plus a processing fee of $5.00 will be charged. Amendment No. 4: Damaged book jackets $2.00, damaged media containers $2.00, security labels, $1.00, barcodes, $1.00. Amendment No. 5: If a fine is owed on lost or damaged items, it will be waived when it is declared lost or damaged, and the replacement cost + processing fee is paid in full. Amendment No. 6: If lost items are found and returned with a library receipt within three months (of payment), a refund minus the processing fee will be issued. Financial Considerations: Changes to fee schedule. Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Library Board reviewed and recommended approval at their October 3, 2001 meeting (6-0). Billy Campbell, City Manager October 30, 2001 Page 2 Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: The City Council may ask for further changes in the policy. Supporting Documents: Copy of the proposed amendments to the Library Fees and Extended Fees Policy. Staff Recommendation: City Council approval of the amendments to the Library Fees and Extended Fees Policy. Southlake Public Library Board Policies and Procedures Manual Policy: Fees and Extended Fees Source: City Council Category: Administration Effective Date: January 2, 2001 Statement of Purpose The purpose of this policy is to provide consistent guidance for the Southlake Public Library staff in fees and extended fees. Policy Statement The Southlake Public Library has established the following schedule for overdue materials as well as fees for lost and/or damaged materials and for other services provided by the Southlake Public Library. Materials extended use fees Books fees as established by current City fee schedule. Books on Cassette fees as established by current City fee schedule. CD fees as established by current City fee schedule. CD-ROM fees as established by current City fee schedule. Magazines fees as established by current City fee schedule. Videocassettes/DVD fees as established by current City fee schedule. Fees Copies fees as established by current City fee schedule. Computer printout fees as established by current City fee schedule. Lost card fees as established by current City fee schedule. Non-resident Card fees as established by current City fee schedule. Library Fees and Extended Fees Policy Page 2 Lost or damaged materials Borrowed materials are the responsibility of the library cardholder. In the case of children under the age of 18, it is the parents/ guardian's responsibility to pay for the lost or damaged items in accordance with the following schedule of terms: 1. Retail replacement cost of any item which is lost or damaged beyond repair and for which a current price canbe found. ror.1onemor.4 Gost pino UQ foe ( ,hinhe< is 1 \ will he levi o`1 On Replacement cost plus $10 processing fee. 2. Average replacement cost for any item which is lost or damaged beyond repair and for which a current price cannot be found. ;GP1 neman4 Gnat Qr rer<rlonol. mon4 A04 P a cin Pr ossiag foo (mh h leoai Will he le<,ie,l .,,, 214 3 , it&1 less 4h.,., t 7 .r-on-th.. old Replacement cost plus $10 processing fee. 3. If the replacement cost of an item is less than $10.00, the replacement cost plus $5 processing fee will be charged. 4. Repair costs for damaged items will be conveyed to the patron from the library staff after the damage is evaluated. 5. Damaged book jackets $2.00 Damaged media containers $2.00 Security labels $1.00 Barcodes $1.00 6. If a fine is owed on lost or damaged items, it will be waived when it is declared lost or damaged, and the replacement cost + processing fee is paid in full. 7. If lost items are found and returned with a library receipt within 3 months (of payment), a refund minus the processing fee will be issued. City of Southlake, Texas -y MEMORANDUM October 30, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (xt. 1527) SUBJECT: Approval of amendments to the Library Computer Use Policy Action Requested: Approval of amendments to the Library Computer Use Policy. Background Information: The library staff and Library Board have reviewed the previously approved Library Computer Use Policy and submits to the City Council the following amendments for review and approval. Amendment No. 1: Clarification of requirements to use the computer, as stated in number two under "criteria." Amendment No. 2: Children must sign -in at the Youth Services Desk. Amendment No. 3: Patrons may download information to a disk purchased from the library (to prevent viruses from being transmitted to the library computers from a user's personal disk.) Amendment No. 4: No saving of information or data on the computer's hard drive. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Library Board reviewed and recommended approval at their October 3, 2001 meeting (6-0). Legal Review: Not Applicable Alternatives: The City Council may ask for further changes in the policy. Supporting Documents: Copy of the proposed amendments to the Library Computer Use Policy. Staff Recommendation: City Council approval of the proposed amendments to the Library Computer Use Policy. 0 Southlake Public Library Board Policies and Procedures Manual Policy: Computer Use Policy Source: City Council Category: Administration Effective Date: July 17, 2001 Statement of Purpose The purpose of this policy is to provide consistent guidance for the Southlake Public Library staff in regards to public use of computers. Policy Statement Public use computers are available to all who meet the following criteria: l . The user must be at least twelve (12) years of age. 2. To use the computer, the user must have their *kd Southlake Library card, and/or a valid driver's license or picture identification. 3. A current signed Computer Lab Agreement must be on file. 4. For children under the age of twelve (12), the parent or legal guardian must reserve the computer and remain with the child(ren) while the equipment is in use. Computer use guidelines: 1. The user must sign in and out at the Reference Desk. Children must sign -in at the Youth Services desk. 2. Computer sessions will be limited to one hour. 3. The computers will be available until thirty (30) minutes before closing. 4. Paper will be available according to the Fee Schedule. 5. Only one user at a time is encouraged. 6. Reservations will not be taken. Computers will be assigned on a first -come, first -served basis. 7. Library staff is available to assist users but cannot provide in-depth training. 8. Patrons may only download information to a disk purchased from the library. 9. Patrons may not load personal software. 10. No peripheral equipment may be used on the Library computers with the exception of accommodations per the Americans with Disabilities Act. 11. Users may not attempt to modify, add to, or remove any system element. 12. Users may not attempt or assist unauthorized access to privileged or confidential computer system elements. 13. System maintenance must be performed by authorized persons only. 14. Users must not use the Library's computers for any illegal purpose. 15. Virus checking software is available on Southlake Public Library computers, 10 Library Computer Use Policy Page 2 but cannot protect users from all viruses. The Southlake Public Library is not responsible for damage to a patron's disc or computer; nor is it responsible for lost, missing, or incorrectly saved data. 16. Users may not save information or data on the computer's hard drive. If any abuse of privilege, or violation of these rules is observed, the user will be asked to leave and may lose future use privileges. CHILD USE OF COMPUTER LAB AGREEMENT �.,I have read the Internet Use Policy and the Computer Lab Use Policy and agree to abide by these policies and procedures. As parent, guardian or other responsible care giver of I give permission for my child to use the Computer Lab and to access the Internet at the Southlake Public Library. I understand that I must accompany my child if under the age of 12. I understand that I, not the Library staff, am responsible for monitoring my child's appropriate use of the Internet and that I am responsible for any damage that may occur through my child's use of the Computer Lab and /or the Internet. Name (Please Print) Date Signature Library Card Number(s) ADULT USE OF COMPUTER LAB AGREEMENT I have read the Internet Use Policy and the Computer Lab Use Policy and agree to abide by these policies and procedures. I agree to pay any repair or replacement cost of equipment or software damaged by myself or by minors for whore I am responsible. I understand that failure to abide by the Southlake Public Library policies and procedures for Internet use and Computer Lab use may result in a one -week suspension of computer privileges. Subsequent violations may result in the loss of any and all library privileges for twelve months. Name (Please Print) Signature Date Library Card Number(s) City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Gary Gregg, Technical Services Manager SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Purchase Telephone System from Inter -Tel for West DPS Station Action Requested: City Council authorization for City Manager to purchase telephone system from Inter -Tel for the West DPS facility. Background Information: The West DPS building requires telephone sets and related equipment to function as a city facility, intercommunicate with other departments and facilities and perform public safety functions. As staff began planning in late 1999 and 2000 for Town Hall and other facilities to come on line, a strategy was developed regarding the interconnection by data and telephone of all major city facilities utilizing the city's fiber optic cable. This strategy culminated in the acceptance by City Council on November 3, 2000 of a proposal from Inter -Tel to provide telephone equipment and sets at all City locations. Envisioning the construction of the West DPS station, the RFP contained provisions for maintaining post cut pricing valid for one year after the date of cutover which occurred December 20,2000. Financial Considerations: The recommended purchase is for a total of $38,600.82. Funding for this purchase follows the original design and concept of centralizing the communications at Town Hall and thus is a TIF eligible project. Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District will be apprised of the purchase. The construction of the West DPS facility was authorized by both City Council and Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District. Legal Review: No review necessary, purchase made pursuant to previously approved RFP. Vendor is QISV. City Council approval necessary due to amount of purchase. Alternatives: Abandon the interconnection philosophy as approved by City Council or place non -interconnected telephone service or different vendor equipment at the site. Supporting Documents: Attached guaranteed pricing sheet. Staff Recommendation: Place this item authorizing the City Manager to purchase an Inter -Tel telephone system and related components from Inter -Tel on the November 5, 2001 City Council meeting agenda for consideration. I.. City of Southlake - West DPS Guaranteed Pricing QTY Part # Descriation Price Ea. Total 11 550.9037 CPU 256 with Software, Memor $ 2,400.51 $2,400.51 1 813.1636 Shielded Card Cabinet Expans $ 196.42 $196.42 2 550.0110 Axxess Power Supply 9 AMP $ 563.50 $1,127.00 2 550.1300 Axxess Card Cabinet $ 829.15 $1,658.30 5ottware PAL and Features! 1 827.9031 100-Unit Software Key PAL $ 6,417.48 $6,417.48 1 Uniform Call Distribution $ - $ - 1 System Forwarding Premium $ - $ - 1 Record -A -Call Premium Fea $ - $ - 1 Multilingual Support (Prem $ - $ - 1 Directories Premium Featu $ - $ - 1 Desktop Interface Premium $ - $ - 1 Automatic Route Selection $ - $ - 1 Automatic Call Distributio $ - $ - 1 Agent Help Premium Featur $ - $ - 1 lAdvanced CO Interfaces Pr $ - $ - USPS AND FEATURES: 11 550.2600 Axxess OPC Options Card with DSP $ 463.68 $ 463.68 TERMINALS: 1 550.4200 DSS/BLF connected to PCDPM $ 305.90 $305.90 2 550.3018 PC Data Port Module PCDPM $ 144.90 $289.80 6 550.4500 Enhanced Display Phone $ 454.02 $2,724.12 30 550.4400 Standard Display Phone $ 355.81 $10,674.30 STATION CARDS: 1 550.2116 Axxess Single Line Card 16 Port $ 1,466.71 $1,466.71 1 550.0114 Single SLC16 Power Supply $ 109.48 $109.48 1 550.2200 Axxess DKSC card 8port) $ 338.10 $338.10 2 550.2255 DKSC16+ card 16port) $ 833.98 $1,667.96 1 TRUNK CARDS: 1 550.2300 Axxess LSC card 4port) $ 331.66 $331.66 1 827.8877 PRI security PAL $ 756.70 $756.70 1 550.2740 Axxess T-1 / E1/PRI Card $ 1,909.46 $1,909.46 1 SOFTWARE: 1 827.9128 Axxess 5.2 Call Processing S PERIPHERALS- 11 Cable ICable Provision Discount 11 900.0642 Batte Backup/UPS - BP1400 1 $ 705.18 $705.18 TOTAL 1 $38,600.82 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM November 5, 2001 To: Billy Campbell, City Manger From: Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, 481-2308 Subject: Authorize the Mayor to execute a Commercial Developer's Agreement for Southlake Bank Place, Lot 7R, Block A (Red Lobster) Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor to execute a Commercial Developer's Agreement for Southlake Bank Place, Lot 7R, Block A (Red Lobster). Background Information: This property was originally platted in 1984 and replatted in 2001. Because it was platted in 1984, before the ordinance requiring park land dedication, no park land dedication or park fee is required. This site is being developed along the frontage road of S.H. 114 for the construction of a Red Lobster restaurant. During the preparation of construction plans, the City staff required the developer to extend an 8" water line from the 12" water line in the S.H. 114 Frontage Road across their property to the west property line. This will provide the undeveloped property to their west, the ability to extend the public water line across their property to provide a loop of the water line between the 12" water line in S.H. 114 Frontage Road and the 6" water line in Bank Street in the future. The developer's agreement covers the construction of this 8" public water line across the Red Lobster property. The developer is requesting that the City reimburse them for one-half of the cost of the water line, which amounts to $5,739.00 because the main purpose of the water line is to provide a loop of the water line to the property to the west of the developer's property. Financial Consideration: There is no park fee and if the City Council chooses to reimburse the developer for one-half the cost of constructing the 8" water line, it would cost the City $5,739.00 Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: This is the City's standard commercial developer's agreement originally drafted by the City Attorney. Alternatives: The Council can approve it, deny it, or modify it. Supporting Documents: Agreement Plat Exhibit Location Map Staff Recommendation: Please place on City Council agenda for November 5, 2001 for Council review and consideration. Staff Contact: Charlie Thomas. P.E., City Engineer, 481-2175 Pedram Farahnak, P.E., Director of Public Works, 481-2308 PF/kw FE 0 NL 57 BLN EAST S99TFiIAK 161 11;4 1162pro 1113 1121521 / 345 IIA 1163 Vicinity Map Red Lobster 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet W a S E 5O�7`t�1..AKE BAN��CE,L� ;�iL�lCK �1 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer", of hereinafter referred to as "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the Addition (a commercial development) and to the off -site improvements necessary to support the Addition. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond and payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all the public facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best -rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to the City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. C. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the Addition. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by the City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned herein above which are intended to be public facilities shall be vested in the City, and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, the City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire Agreement shall occur at such time that the City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved, and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water , street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c: Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and C. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and acceptance by the City. F. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said Addition which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the Addition so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City. J. The Developer agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. II. FACILITIES A. ON -SITE WATER The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. B. DRAINAGE Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the Director of Public Works, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA and TNRCC requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS The street construction in the Addition will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the Director of Public Works. 1. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and two year operation of street lights, which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition; or an agreement with utility provider stating that no charge will be made for street lights for the two-year duration. b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the Addition, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances; c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended based upon the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as prepared by the Developer's engineer by an engineering study or direction of the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features, however, should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means, the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 2. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre -planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON -SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, engineering, permits and Impact Fees. In the event that certain sewer lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. E. EROSION CONTROL During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this Addition. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build- up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the Addition. F. AMENITIES It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect the City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans to be stamped "Released for Construction" by the Director of Public Works must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. 4. Developer Agreement must be executed. 5. The Developer, or Contractor, shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance, naming the City as co-insured, prior to commencement of any work. 6. A Pre -Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors, major Sub -Contractors, Utilities and appropriate Government Agencies. 0 GENERAL PROVISIONS A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY AND ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES OR TRESPASSERS. GROSS�NEGILIG 1,1-, iV115C©»DUCT: DEVELOPER . M AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the Director of Public Works or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the Director of Public Works signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless except��r�e C 'stir its r�ifi rs"end pl ' ce oesy�ovura ..a , tea�.� negfi � c r'wilffuI "duel the City, its officers, agents, servants and p._ . _. employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, andet".,fv's` Yrri ail11 r"M ,e�, - ra n guVe r wii r _ t �nt�u z 3 ne Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This Agreement or any part herein, or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his or her own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. F. Work performed under the Agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this Agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the Agreement with such renewed Agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. III. OTHER ISSUES A. OFF -SITE DRAINAGE B. OFF -SITE SEWER C. OFF -SITE WATER D. PARK FEES Property was platted prior to ordinance requiring park land dedication, therefore no park fee is required. E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-A. F. The developer requests that the City reimburse them for half of the cost of constructing an 8" water line across their property in an amount of $5,739.00. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: GMRI. Texas. LP By: _ Title: Address: 1751 Directors Row, Orlando Florida 32809 STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public My commission expires: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS am Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The Letter of Credit may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against Letters of Credit must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining Letter of Credit. 9. Expiring Letter of Credit must be replaced by substitute Letters of Credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the Letter of Credit held by the City. :�` I:a� !•!at�j j' i I; aE i qaq maa 'xi I 3= J z `�� _ F3c �� ;7 a -a ' ' a f <L�oo g •,,z { 3 i i3 -O Zoz�_m�;< '^ ��: s"<t �.: .sg: •'- f a. p� ��: { p�,� , i...-= �'•;,�3!�� N >6] CF'zv,.<>_e: Eii :i mi �'oYS'd=:=�' Ii� Ida f�i fill 1- W �= 393 iI of e 3 {se 31 �jr m C-3 U1 ao• o'� ] 2 s z�3v tlei ge 3i 3s Ij {a7,9 i{i t u c� ;< sag �1 $� : a { I {» - 1°a D 11.1 �9 3 i i 11P H. SS i-s i ie :r 55 Dyyck g aas 1 g D F• ei gI a s i 9 •{ xS7g� �t33d; ;k „9p $ i-3I y na ?asI ai6 a -11 -w 3 s T s Bar �E '� ss� 55 RI� < ai{a,. is z a i o !s•i9€IDiS"7 E. lies t.adai '-�`D•i;�t-s!lf x I'';, {i;i�[ 6�a fi Sip tali d ' •ia31� a .41z a - siil'fi`Stt es 1{` FD, x'{ a 2 cis g < i -I• ai l ii s� s Y i. ; e. Ds• Y ,.+✓ / EP ... i{�ci=e`fI ,�ssa 3 7,1 j� sg pp } i it 1 ll,a D Y- E 3 qq° olry 6�i l i9fi i$ <9 c9•-1 n I;= aLs'oN LadLce. .wms dsLsod v_.o Euuw alm 3 ON LMIISP/'.aw�E l31S.3 Sn,Ow1 Q e E s F 3793 g}raiqYqpSea JF' �i;ja '•fa!'» 8 �i� — -i j---- -��„ 1`,=-�?-- T ,4y! Si asF i� jielti;; all 9 � i i ,als• � �jE 1{.s!a 1 '�'. F-. eD /' 7 WIN; s r tt {•-. a ai ig��€'€z:r� o d �l:aii ilibli;c3•ci?Fi :s ± " :a3 �9.. f �'260',.?'- 6 gi dj �a .W _; =C �I � Ilia _ -— < o c o .N � N1J 6 i Y-d0-1X01tl Onend 0i) 3..ZZ.:0.00 N (- ! 30nd ,•nb ]HviwLn05 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM November 5, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Harold R. Cates, Director of Human Resources (Ext. 1952 SUBJECT: Approval by City Council for Employee Benefits coverage for Accidental Death and Dismemberment, Basic Group Life, and Long Term Disability Insurance Action Requested: City Council approve and permit the City of Southlake Employees for continued coverage for Accidental Death and Dismemberment, Basic Group Life Insurance, Long Term Disability with BMA/ MetLife. Background Information: BMA/ Metlife is the current carrier for the City of Southlake's insurance coverage for the three (3) insurance benefits listed above. BMA/ MetLife is also the carrier for Voluntary Life Insurance benefits. The City does not pay for this benefit. Employees may choose the level of the voluntary life insurance coverage and are responsible for that cost. Financial Considerations: Of the three (3) insurance benefits offered, only the Basic Life Insurance Benefit will increase in the coming year. 1. 2. 3. Basic Accidental Death & Dismemberment (no change in rates) Annual Cost = ($11,740,485.67*$0.03/$1,000) _ Basic Group Life (Increase of $0.01 over FY 00/01) Annual Cost = ($11,740,485.67*$0.17/ $1,000) _ Long Term Disability (no change in rates) Annual Cost = ($11,740,485.67 *$0.34/$100) _ Total Cost for all employees for FY 2001/2002 = Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not applicable $352.22 $1,995.88 $39,917.65 $42.265.75 Billy Campbell, City Manager November 5, 2001 Page 2 Legal Review: No Ordinance is required. Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the attorneys. Agreement renews itself through Council approval. Alternatives: None Supporting Documents: Premium Rates Summary Sheet Staff Recommendation: Approval of by the City Council Premium Rate Summary Group Client: City of Southlake Group No: GR094314 Renewal Date:10/01/2001 Type of Coverage Current Monthly Revised Monthly Basic AD&D Per $1,000 $0.03 No Change Long Term Disability Per $100 Covered Payroll $0.34 No Change Basic Life Per$1,000 $0.16 $0.17 Voluntary Life Per $1,000 Age Based Rates No Change Signed by For: City of Southlake City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM November 2, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Rick Black, Director of Public Safety (Ext. 2421) SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Atlantis Scuba located at 2001 W. Southlake Boulevard, Suite 111. Action Requested: City Council consideration of a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A. Background Information: Atlantis Scuba is a retail business located at 2001 W. Southlake Boulevard, Suite 111. Drews Realty Investments, on behalf of Atlantis Scuba, is requesting a variance to install a sign as shown on the attached plans. This would vary the following section of Sign Ordinance No. 704-A . • Section 16.A ATTACHED SIGN • A.3. MAXIMLJM AREA: The sign has a total area of 24 square ft. The maximum allowed area for an attached sign is .75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet. The storefront at this location is 15 feet, therefore the maximum allowed area would be 11.25 square feet. STAFF NOTE: This is an existing sign the tenant wishes to utilize rather than having to have a new sign fabricated. The tenant presently occupying this space has a sign similar in size and neighboring signs at this location also have similar or larger area square footages. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None Alternatives: The council may approve the request, deny the request, or approve it subject to whatever conditions they deem appropriate. Supporting Documents: Variance Application Form Site Plan Ordinance No.704-A, Section 16.A.3. Photo Rendition Staff Recommendation: Place the variance request on the November 5, 2001 City Council meeting for disposition. RB/sv 1 The following sections have been excerpted from the Sign Ordinance No. 704-A SEC.14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self- imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Signs may not be attached to light fixtures, poles, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, streets, utility poles, public buildings, fences, railings, public telephone poles, or trees. The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a three (3) square foot area used for building identification. 3. MAXIMUM AREA: 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet (see Appendix'A' for further clarification). 4 Sign Variance Presentation • Business: Atlantis Scuba • Address: 2001 W. Southlake Blvd. Suite 111 • Request: Seeking to increase allowable sign area from 11.25 s.f. to 24 s.f. • Issue Facts: Business has 15 ft. store front. allowed area is 0.75 s.f, per foot of store front. 0.75 x 15 ft. = 11.25 s.f. allowed area. Proposed sign is 24 s.f. This is an increase of just over 100% • Special Info.: Proposed sign is an existing unit. The tenant hopes to utilize it instead of having to fabricate a new sign. Several neighboring signs have similar or larger square footage areas. • Ordinance Matrix: Maximum area: 0.75 s.f. for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 s.f. 3 IOf V31 .'.VVI 1 !: LL Sep 20 01 10:49a LO-0410 Building D 7 11\VGJ11'1 a174916713 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATIOV APPLICANT NAME: ADDRESS: y_ , Cam! LY''` '� 131✓J PHONE: FAX: OWNER (if different) IWO ltp�, �tV�eStmeAtaAt �t L . P. ��l W ft�TWS 7602-2_9113 Aia CM- aiti t8 I'lte following informateoat pertains to tie location for u hieh the variance :a ngce-nad NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: /4/'-%'IvTS SG U ►.3 A' L., L . e , STREET ADDRESS: 2001 t3. !�ou+h lak& bJV(A 5uif -&- 1 } LEGAL )DESCRIPTIO! ; Loth, 14-8 Block-1 Subdivision;__ �te GrpS.,elr Pjl�`��[ I hereby cra y that iLhis eppi.m"on is conplete si per the taquiremenls of Sian Ordinum No. 704 " summarized below, I !utthe: uncerstmd that it is r to haw a to merta7ve at the City caunetl mcet:ns Who is anti 6zCd :o tssc_ss Las re4ust. Applicant's signature: Date: /0 - 3 - e / The following checklist is a $• of : quiremalts for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should farther refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 704 and amentime a, and other ordinances reaps, and codes available tit the City F?.all that tray pertain t0 this Sign variance requeSt Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested vatia-nce (see attached.). Site plan showing the vocation of the sign variance request and any oche: silts that conform to or are exempt from the sigh ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking do approaches and adjoining strut R. 0. W. Scaled and diw.c='oaed elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the %,ariance is requ=cd, and say other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sigh ordinance. H I/ V. / LVV1 1 f . tL Vi f Y1V UY1U LI\LWJ I\LI"1L 1 1 .-"V 11.1 r Hur- V. Sep 20 Ol 10:$0a Building D 0174815713 p.4 AtlantisScuba. sign variance demonstration Demonstration the 1 That a literal enforcement of the sign rvg>,ilation will craft an uruleresssry hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant Because of this Tenant's narrow frontage, signage In compliance w/City's Ordinance would appear Inconsistent w/other Tenant's signage 0 this Shopping Center. 2 - That tl:e situation causing the uzutecessary hardship or practical difEeu?ty is unique to the affected prope.-ty and is not self imposed. This Tenant's narrow frontage Is not a product of its occupying a smaller - than -anther's space, but of Its depth - so constructed to better fit the site. That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and petmitted development of adjacent properties. Rather than Injure, the approval of this variance will provide for more compatible signage at this location. 4, That t.'1e variance will be in harmOly with the spirit and purpose of the silt ordinance. The requested variance will more adequately allow this Tenant's signage to be more consistent and harmonious with other tenants' signage throughout all three phases of this Shopping Center. IN iU RJ FL---- k. RTr rrL- fwmL -tml! I lilt 1111LIF-I filiLl.111L=) FU Ahk VW (BOUnt-AM BLVDJ A". 1- 41, City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM November 2, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Rick Black, Director of Public Safety (Ext. 2421) SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Bice's Florist located at 2063 W. Southlake Boulevard. Action Requested: City Council consideration of a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A. Background Information: Bice's Florist is a retail business located at 2063 W. Southlake Boulevard. Drews Realty Investments, on behalf of Bice's Florist, is requesting a variance to install a sign as shown on the attached plans. This would vary the following sections of Sign Ordinance No. 704-A: • Section 16.A ATTACHED SIGN • A.3. MAXRv UM AREA: The sign has a total area of 107 square ft. The maximum allowed area for an attached sign is .75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet. The storefront at this location is 71 feet, therefore, the maximum allowed area would be 53.25 square feet. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None Alternatives: The council may approve the request, deny the request, or approve it subject to whatever conditions they deem appropriate. Supporting Documents: Variance Application Form Site Plan Ordinance No.704-A, Section 16.A. 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9. Photo Rendition Staff Recommendation: Place the variance request on the November 5, 2001 City Council meeting for disposition. RB/sv 1 The following sections have been excerpted from the Sign Ordinance No. 704-A SEC.14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self- imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Signs may not be attached to light fixtures, poles, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, streets, utility poles, public buildings, fences, railings, public telephone poles, or trees. The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a three (3) square foot area used for building identification. 2. MINIMUM /MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six (6) inches. The maximum height allowed for letters or logos shall be based on the following criteria: Distance From R.O.W. * Maximum Letter/Logo Height Less than 100 ft. 12 inches 101 - 150 ft. 18 inches 151 - 200 ft. 24 inches 201 - 250 ft. 30 inches 251 - 300 ft. 36 inches 301 and greater 42 inches * - For any lease space which does not front on a street, the maximum letter/logo height shall be based on the distance from the vehicular driveway access (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). MAXIMUM AREA: 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet (see Appendix 'A' for further clarification). NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one attached sign per lease space shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. A secondary sign may be permitted at a public entrance, provided the entrance is on another side of the building, but shall be limited to twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary or permitted sign size, whichever is more restrictive. The six (6) inch minimum letter/logo height will not apply to these secondary signs. No more than two (2) attached signs shall be allowed per lease space. Attached signs shall be located within the first story of the main exterior entrance for a building or lease space (see Appendix `B' for further clarification). 2 SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent (75%) of the width of any building or lease space. In the event the lease space facade is horizontally articulated, the 75% rule shall apply to the allowed sign to be located on any single plane facade (see Appendix'B' for further clarification). ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof line of any building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend above the parapet wall. Signs shall be no closer vertically to the eave of the roofline or overhang than the predominant letter height (see Appendix 'B' for further clarification). Signs may be attached to a continuous plane fascia, if the sign does not extend above or below the projection of the fascia. Signs attached to fascia are only allowed when attached to structural canopy supported to the ground by columns constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure (See Appendix `B' for further clarification). ILLUMINATION: Attached signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting. Exterior letters with exposed neon lighting are not allowed. 8. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") from the building, excluding signs attached to canopies. 9. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any facade (other than the main front of the building) which faces property zoned for single-family residential uses if the sign is within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the property line of said residential property. 3 Sign Variance Presentation • Business : Bice's Florist • Address: 2063 W. Southlake Boulevard. • Request : Seeking to increase allowable letter height from 12 inches to 22 inches for one letter and 16 inches for remaining letters. Seeking to increase allowable area from 15.37 square feet to 17.25 square feet. • Issue Facts: Business has 20.5 ft. store front. Allowed area is 0.75 s.f. per foot of store front. 0.75 x 20.5 ft. = 15.37 s.f. allowed area. Proposed sign is 17.25 s.f. This is 1.88 s.f. over allowed area. (12 % increase). Store front is 80 feet from R.O.W. and allowed 12 inch letters per ordinance. Sign has one letter 22 inches high with remaining letters 16 inches high. • Special Info.: Proposed sign is an existing unit. The sign presently has a large flower shaped logo used as an apostrophe between the letter "c" and the letter "s". This would be replaced with an actual apostrophe symbol which is much less obtrusive than the present logo. This lease space is at the opposite end of the space occupied by "GameStop" which recently received a variance to place a sign with 21 inch letters. The proposed sign would balance aesthetically with this sign. 4 • Ordinance Matrix: Maximum area: 0.75 s.f. for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 s.f. Distance from R.O.W. Less than 100 ft. 101-150 ft. 151-200 ft. 201-250 ft. 251-300 ft. 301 and greater 5 Maximum Letter/Logo Height 12 inches 18 inches 24 inches 30 inches 36 inches 42 inches Sep 20 01 10:49a Building D 8174815713 p.3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION f APPLIC—A—NT ON ER (if different) N,4.N4E: (G� c - itr owl t✓ ADDRESS: ws ea n e n t 00 PHONE: Southiake, Texas 76092-9113 812. 251. 2256 FAX: 442 f T t 1 - ��' �. 4 icc . 8,-1lra The following information pertains to the location for which the variance is requested NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: STREET ADDRESS: X& 3 cy. soc,,.f M a ke b l ; Sc��h Ilk , -f7( W 092 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 64(o Block- Subdivision: rx44hlake CXOssjnFj- ph@SeM I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 704 as summarized below. I further at it is necessary to have a representative at the City Council meeting who is authorized to 'sc S eque Applicant's signature: Date:' The following checklist is s.lmmary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No.704 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. --� PP q ompleted sign variance re uest application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached.) . Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt tiom the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R. 0. W. Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shail show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. Demonstration Please demonstrate that the following conditions are applicable to the requested sign variance: 1 ' That a literal enforcement of the sign regulation will crate an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant �� 2. That ke situation causmg�tie unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. VIP- C CG Ct � 3. That the variance will not inj a ar will be wholly compatible with theeaand permitted development of adjacent_ properties. ✓L&-2L wJU 4 • That the varian�be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. EXISTING SIGN 12'_On b 6' 2211 ) C � 1 6n (1)One set of eAdng channel letters to be relocated to location as shown above. (with out yellow flower). Manufacture (1)one apostrophe to replace flower. ggg- 691 Wt 66 z g at Hex N jai NJ Cr 00 N W w � s a� o "0 U Q U� W N 4 Q (5� OZ Phi c8 X N Y c m >�2 O LL Y "QWu_ N m C y � 10 OD m M . Q P QQN m � 0 O• LLM x •• O � U ui City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT November 1, 2001 CASE NO: PROJECT: ZA01-092 Kimball Park REQUEST: On behalf of Schon M. McManus, Four Peaks Development is requesting zoning and concept plan approval. ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading rezoning and concept plan request. ATTACHMENTS: (Al Background Information. (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information _ (D) Site Plan Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480-38'It (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Tara Brooks (481-2079) Case No. ZA01-092 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Schon M. McManus APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development PURPOSE: The purpose of this plan is to obtain zoning and concept plan approval for 5 duplex buildings, for a total of 10 living units. A Site Plan will have to be approved before any of the units are constructed. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at the southwest corner of East Highland Street and North Kimball Avenue. HISTORY: There is no recent development history on this property. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Tract 2C, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being 3.267 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential The Medium Density Residential category is suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Limited low intensity office and/or retail uses may be permitted provided that the nature of the commerce is to support the surrounding neighborhood and that the area is sufficiently buffered from adjacent residential property. Such non-residential uses must be compatible with and not intrusive to the adjacent residential uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi -Public categories. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "MF-1" Two Family Residential District TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends that E. Highland St. be a 2-lane, undivided collector street with 70' of R.O.W. The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends that N. Kimball Ave. be a 5-lane, undivided arterial street with 94' of R.O.W. Adequate R.O.W. has been dedicated. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions E. Highland St. and N. Kimball avenue are both currently 2-lane, undivided collector streets. Case No. Attachment A ZA01-092 Page 1 May, 2001 traffic counts on Highland Street (between Kimball Avenue and Carroll Avenue): Table #1 24hr West Bound (WB) (1,235) East Bound (EB) 1,115 WB Peak A.M. 201) 7-8 a.m. Peak P.M. (121) 6-7 p.m. EB j Peak A.M. 152) 8-9 a.m. Peak P.M. (113) 4-5 p.m. May, 2001 traffic counts on Kimball Avenue (between SH114 and Highland Street): Table #2 24hr North Bound 3,762) South Bound (SB) 3,593) NB Peak A.M. 166 11-12 a.m. Peak P.M. (338) 7-8 p.m. SB Peak A.N.I. (335) 9-10 a.m. Peak P.M. (242) 7-8 p.m. May, 2001 traffic counts on Kimball Avenue (between Highland Street and Dove Street): Table #3 24hr North Bound3,415) South Bound (SB) 3,083) NB _(NB) Peak A.M. 14) 8-9 a.m. Peak P.M. 332) 3-4 p.m. SB Peak A.M. 328 7-8 a.m. Peak P.M. 203 5-6 p.m. Tra c Im act _ _ Use No. Vtpd* AM- AM- PM -IN PM - of IN OUT OUT _ units Residential 10 58.6 1 17 4 2 *Vehicle Trips Per Day *The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on Kimball Avenue. Master Trail Plan The Current Trail Master Plan indicates a six (6) foot sidewalk along the west side of North Kimball Avenue and an eight (8) foot multi -use trail along the south side of East Highland Street. The applicant has provided both. WATER & SEWER: There is an existing 12" water line in the east right-of-way of Kimball Ave and jogs over to the west right-of-way at Shady Lane. There is an existing 6" water line in the north right-of-way of Highland Street. An 8" sanitary sewer is existing on Kimball Ave. approximately 500' south of this property. , Case No. Attachment A ZA01-092 Page 2 ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: Table # Water $18,586.40 assumes 10 1" meters Wastewater $11,582.40 (assumes 10 1" meters Roadwav $9,921.80 * Final Impact Fees are determined by the Building Services Department at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shown above only represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. P&Z ACTION: October 18, 2001; Denied (6-1). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated October 12, 2001. The Land Use Plan designation for this tract is Medium Density Residential, which is defined as, "a category suitable for any single-family detached residential development." This plan proposes five two-family dwelling units on five lots. The attached Concept Plan shows that each duplex unit will be a minimum of 1,500 square feet, which is the minimum permitted by the district. However, the developer has indicated that the units could be approximately 2,500 square feet (approximately 5,000 square feet per building.) This site is subject to residential adjacency standards. A Site Plan must be approved for each site prior to issuance of a building permit. Exact size and design would be established with the Site Plan. Case No. Attachment A ZA01-092 Page 3 Vicinity Kimball Park Map Addition 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet W S E Case No. Attachment B ZA01-092 Page 1 E I� OF y m I:I qC Tom'" CiS .T yt 2% iliaHiR NOZ..LIUQY GAOI+oN jVPArVW L I .LOT La a , z � � asses gy A r x Irr _-IIIsI , --------- z ----� I � w�V,M'W iY3 L — - — — — Case No. Attachment C ZA01-092 Page 1 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA01-092 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 10/12/01 Project Name: Concept Plan — "MF-1" Zoning for Kimball Park Addition APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Four Peaks Development Welch Engineering, Inc. 726 Commerce Street, Suite 109 4109 Cagle Drive, Suite D Southlake, TX 76092 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Phone: 817-329-6996 Phone: 817-284-1175 Fax: Fax: 817-589-0990 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/04/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT TARA BROOKS AT (817) 481-2079. Change the labels for the Private Access Easements to Commorr Access Easements. Show and label a 25' Common Access Easement centered over the drive accessing N. Kimball Avenue. Informational Comments Fire apparatus access needs to be provided to within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of buildings on a "hose -lay" basis. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. This review is based on the "MF-1" Zoning District Regulations. This site falls within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by Ordinance 480-CC, Section 43, Part III "Residential Adjacency Standards". Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan, the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the"site plan. A Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements: Case No. ZA01-092 Attach ment D Page 1 IN • Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as -amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended. • Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended • Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill -over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per §31; Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Denotes Informational Comment N:ACOMMUNrrY DEVELOP\IENTIWP-FILES\PEV.200I101-092CP2.DOC Case No. Attach ment D ZA01-092 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Kimball Park Addition Owner 1. F. Ferguson 1. 2. W. Massey 2. 3. wE II, Ltd 3. 4. NW II, Ltd 4. 5. NVE H, Ltd 5. 6. B. Daniel 6. 7. NW II, Ltd 7. 8. B. Hugghins 8. 9. Southlake Westerra 9. 10. H. Miller 10. 11. F. Record 11. 12. E. Huning 12. 13. S. McManus 13. 14. S. McManus 14. 15. City of Grapevine 15. Zoning Land Use Acreage SF-1A 1. Low Density Residential 1. 2.31 B-1 2. Mixed Use 2. 4.00 SF-20A 3. Med. Density Residential 3. 0.45 SF-20A 4. Med. Density Residential 4. 0.46 SF-20A 5. Med. Density Residential 5. 0.49 SF-20A 6. Med. Density Residential 6. 0.46 SF-20A 7. Med. Density Residential 7. 0.45 SF-20A 8. Med. Density Residential 8. 0.46 0-1 9. Mixed Use 9. 10.5 AG 10. Mixed Use 10. 1.65 AG 11. Mixed Use 11. 1.27 SF -IA 12. Low Density Residential 12. 2.81 AG 13. Med. Density Residential 13. 3.68 AG 14. Med. Density Residential 14. 3.68 15. 15. Case No. Attachment E ZA01-092 Page 1 w Surrounding Property Owner Response Kimball Park Addition NOTICES SENT: Eleven (11) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Hazel Miller, 5213 McQuade, Ft. Worth, TX., Jack Hanna, 210 CR 260, Gainesville, TX., in favor, "This type of development would be beneficial to that part of Kimball Road and would probably increase the value of raw land surrounding project." (Received October 17, 2001) • Eric A. and Mary A. Huning, 2145 E. Highland, Southlake, TX, in favor. (Received October 18, 2001) Sixteen (16) responses were received outside of the 200'notification area: • Charles Whitacre, Southlake, TX, is opposed " I am totally �w against this development. This is the beginning of apartments and the end of the Southlake we enjoy." (Received September 24, 2001) • Sherry Berman, Southlake, TX, is opposed " I hope that you will vote against this duplex site that is coming up. It will open the door for many others in Southlake and will put a burden on our school system." (Received October 9, 2001) • John and Lynn Luhmann, Southlake, TX, is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 5, 2001) • Mimi Best, 606 Logans Lane, Southlake, TX, is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 17, 2001) • Christopher D. Smith, 1500 Oak Lane, Southlake, TX is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 15, 2001) • Sherri Glazier, 1203 Plantation, Southlake, TX is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 15, 2001) Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Pagel • Rick and Dawn Rudolph, 703 Saxon Trail, Southlake, TX is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 15, 2001) • Carrie Center, 215 Silverwood Cr., Southlake, TX is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 15, 2001) • Susan Barnett is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 15, 2001) • Brandon Baker, President, Bury Owner DFW, Las Colinas, TX is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 15, 2001) • Susan Craney and Steve Hastings, 1020 Alamo Drive, Southlake, TX is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 18, 2001) • James and Mar, Ryniak, 705 Shadow Glen Dr., Southlake, TX is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 18, 2001) • David Ackerman, MD is opposed. See attached email. (Received October 18, 2001) • A Petition of Opposition bearing 128 signatures was also received. Please see separate attachment. Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page2 Page 1 of 1 Lorrie Herrick From: jluhmann 01uhmann2a@home.comj Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:06 AM To: Iherrick®cityofso uth la ke.com Subject: Proposed Multi Family Dear Commissioner. I would like to extend my appreciation for your service to our fine city. I would like to advise you as to my position regarding the Kimball Park Duplex proposal on the Southwest comer of E. Highland and N. Kimball. I feel it is not in the best interests of Southlake citizens for the following reasons: 1. These duplexes would be the first ever Multi -Family (MF-1) type zoning in Southlake and (as proposed) be a low -quality development setting a precedent for more of the same. 2. This proposal does not conform to the Southlake Land Use Plan Designation of Medium Density Residential for this site. This is an excellent opportunity for you to make the fith decision for all of Southlake. I thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, John and Lynn Luhmann 718 Saxon Trail Southlake, Texas 76092 RECD01Ui 032001 10/5/2001 Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 3 Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:26 PM To: Iherrick@cityofsouthlake.com; mrufjim@att.net; redsooner@home.com; dfaglie@ael.com; vbboren@msn.com DR>.ar Comm.33_onars: I am writ — nu .. _ ._v letter to express my concerns over the Procosed K.imbali DuPlax ji-veLobment :,. he sc.:'_hweSL corner of E. -;ighiand and N. Kimnail. _ _ec, i t., oc'I-slake for vera'_ _easo: -. ._. r.c ..__�-1 •_ll na.- no ;: ult._ tam. iJ ^.pments i.and, v.� u _r' :11_ ar.l_y :•wth. mo=e peopi,_ -nears mor. s:fee-,s, police ar(d f-re services, e:7. These z-in7S Qvn t Comd :heel - a:�lake ._ izer.: 'r:a, seen .:heir cr:certy taxes e'>:�__... at or the rac- __.eral years to pay for =hese ser Jces! 'Will buyers of mil-i-f.-mil . u-1L,xez' pa aS •T:;.ICn _n prOAe rtV tare$ aS We dGy LO CG'✓8Y these SP_r'7 _Ces. Secondly,..y'.� prcpesai does not .-orto .i,e Southlake Lard "J_e :ian for the develou;::ei. site. ...` Land 'se Pl_. an is a well -thought cut, strategic planning tool tha_ man Southiake- -zees support. 'here should be compelling reasons to approve a development that is line wi-h the Plan. ea...., -o^ __.- _he - concerns cefor_ voting cn _ne Ki,,ra11 ?ark G�:p.Le:{ proposes_. -- _ a -eat�tl�uJ___ ycu do tl.e right thing fcr Sc,-`,la'r.e and _`.s ..itl.en.3! Sincere'_;, Mimi Best j506 Lagans Lane Soutnlake, ... '6092 Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 4 Letter to Commissioner Jones - Kimball Park Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 1:46 PM To: Iherrick@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: Letter to Commissioner Jones - Kimball Park October 14, 2001 Dear Commissioner Jones, 1 would like to express my appreciation for your service to our fine city. Page I of 1 The reason I'm writing you is because I'm very concerned about the Kimball Park Duplex proposal on the southwest corner of E. Highland and N. Kimball. I feel it is not in the best interests of Southlake for the following reasons: —DOES NOT CONFORM TO SOUTHLAKE LAND USE PLAN (The land is currently designated medium -density residential, not high -density MF-1.) —LOW VALUE, HIGH -DENSITY HOUSING HAS A NET NEGATIVE FISCAL IMPACT (According to the Residential Fiscal Impact Studies done by the Center for Urban Policy and Purdue University, the net negative impact is caused by a higher and disproportionate tax burden on lower density homeowners, higher school enrollment, more traffic congestion, greater need for police and fire protection and the devaluation of surrounding properties.) --GREATER BURDEN ON OUR ALREADY OVERCROWDED SCHOOL POPULATION AND HIGHER TAXES. (According to the Southlake Projected Population Report, dated January 1, 2000, the Effective Build -Out upper limit of 35,580 residents is based upon the current Land Use Plan, not on the higher density proposed by this project.) —THE LAND USE PLAN IS A WELL THOUGHT-OUT GUIDE FOR DEVELOPMENT PLACEMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTION. It is used to determine future infrastructure needs and ultimately the property taxes we pay. The reason this proposal is before our council is to get a waiver to increase the population density and eventually our taxes. This incremental dismantling of our Land Use Plan will skew the development and population projections and create future capacity problems for our schools, streets, water, sewer, police and fire protection and eventually increase our taxes. This is an excellent opportunity for you to make the right decision for all of Southlake. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Christopher D. Smith 1500 Oak Lane Southlake, TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 5 Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:30 AM To: Iherrick@cityofsouthlake.com; redsooner@home.com; vbboren@msn.com; dfaglie@aol.com; murgim@aatt.net Subject: Kimball/Highland Multi -Family Duplex Proposal TO: ALL Planning and Zoning elected officials FROM: Southlake Resident, 1203 Plantation RE: MULTI FAMILY DUPLEX PROPOSAL As residents of Southlake, we APPPOSE strongly the consideration of any multi -family use construction and development in the city of Southlake. We strongly hope and expect that the LAND USE design for Southlake that was put into effect will be substantial reason enough to deny the proposal. It is our understanding that the individual behind the multi -use family duplex development is the same individual that effectively convinced the city to allow smaller than 1 acre residential developments. If we had continued to limit housing development to 1 acre, we wouldn't be in a position to spend excessive time, energy and tax dollars on the issue of 1 or 2 High Schools and road systems would be much more safe and less congested. This multi -family duplex development should obviously be denied without question! Please stick to the integrity of your elected positions and keep Southlake the quality city that it is, free from multi -family duplex. Vote "NO". APPOSE multi -family zoning change. Support existing SOUTHLAKE LAND USE plan. Thank you for your time. Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 6 Lorrie Herrick From: { Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 10:24 AM To: !herrick@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: concerned citizen Dear Commissioner Herrick, Thank you for your service to our wonderful community. We have lived here for three years now and have watched the city of Southlake develope into this outstanding place to live. The reason I am writing to you is that I am concerned about the Kimball Park Cuplex proposal on the southwest corner of E. Highland and N. Kimball. I feel it is not in the best intersts of Southlake citizens for the following feasons: • These duplexes would be the first ever multi -family (MF-1) type zoning in Southlake and (as proposed) be a low -quality development setting a precedent for more of the same. • This porposal does not comform to the Southlake Land Use Plan Designation of Medioum Density Residential for this site. This is an excellent opportunity for you to make a good decision for all of Southlake - please do not vote for this rezoning. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Rick and Dawn Rudolph 703 Saxon Trail, Sthlake Case No. ZA01-092 Attachment F Page 7 Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: Iherrick@cityofsouthlake.com; murfjim@att.net; reddsooner@home.com; vbborne@msn.com: DFaglie@aol.com Subject: re: MULTI -FAMILY (MF-1) DUPLEXES in Southlake TO W'=m :t may concern am writinr; to voice my opcosi=ion the Four Peaks Development at t'r.e corner of E. Highland and N. Kimball. y,i family moved hers from Highland ?ark in Dallas two years ago because we saw scuthlake as -he one place where_ rig corl_ Nave i_ all, _-_st clan a_ducation for our kids, a __rst _lass and ccmm=...._.__ _cmmunity, and all =or a _c___t.. t` what we were _ayir. _I•a in :i.:. __ _:ou a'_� .. dup..exes t oe hu:-- we. m' , _ .;ell a._ge Cit'y'Jname to Piano, =ri.s' or any of t:.e ,then t:narn''ass sub.:._cs. sour:c an alarmist 1 1_ved in Da_'- s or 11 y� and the ".suburbs" ex- 3oGthiake, :'lave the linage of being tacky, cheesy aces _-:e. We nc_ afford tc put ir thes? kir.c of_-e,op:r.eras. Ever. -- these duplexes cost smOC,000 a piece _:`,ey ar stiti nothing but exper.s,v apartments' Please do not allow these ;ands of deveopments to iafiltrat our town and destroy __-Y's image. Sincerely, Carrie Carter 215; Silverwocd Cr. M cU LJd Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 8 Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 7:30 AM To: Iherrick@cityofsouthlake.com; murgim@att.net; redsooner@home.com; dfaglie@aol.com; vbboren(g)msn.com Subject: Four Peaks Project I am writing to voice my concerns about the proposed multi -family duplex project. Please do NOT support this project, which is not in accordance with the Land Use Plan for Southlake. I am hopeful, and indeed expecting, that the P & Z will vote in accordance with the citizens' washes. This project has no place in Southlake. Please vote AGAINST this development. Sincerely, Susan Barnett t'� 'u Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 9 Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 9:39 AM To: Iherrick@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: Kimball Park by Four Peaks Development It is my-:rderstanding that this development DOES NOT CONFORMS to the stated Land Use Plar of Southiake. Is there any reason the P & Z should consider abandoning the Land Use Plan for this developmen '? Thanks;ou. Brand--- Faker PresiCer: BUY 01.NNER DFVV Las Co inas 214,09-4.9777 FX 214 3 54. 9785 Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 10 Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:40 PM To: Iherrick@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: Multi -Family Development 1— A,err:.7k: _'lease forward our message to each of the P&Z rrIbe,_Ts agen.c!a. Deaf :&Z Mer-ber: completely and totally cpcosad to the re,ques'=d ov 4 3-3ks e proper -y- a H i c h 11 a n d -a r I - �_ u 1 ' 'q j _......_..-_a'. is t`la Lund 'i S e Plan far 7:nP- area. M Y rl:. -9 T,.,- ea s ds.rain on sch,:),_l and :: 4 , V r es caul,_.. I V nG Us am I y no u s I "I :.ct con-rlDUte a .Ic -,;1e a'ddItLonal. demanas created Fly 2) �-_r Master and clan was deve_Ioped Lc r2-.:.dir• 4 bala,,cd, ^u: development plan for So-_:thlake. That plan__,erve al l y-If residents by prcvi,�:iinq appropriate resources from both the city and -1re Fclhoc_ 'i i �7., r. r i c. t ; =r.d the f�:n ' ilars -0 cav for those resources. Ignoring the :Ian -.es -,h-- C_Jty ar--'Q crea*_-�s areas W--re resources are scarce. 4) Th.i3 developer :both W44_th 4 Peaks at -.a has a long history With are c W_ -)n e c� L,in � ri s F I -a n get, ii�ah profit scenarios. They generaliv A. nn fr�, 1. - zeek 10, ')VP-.,rn or .ctf-1 phe".0r,67— m - .7et variances from City 7,�-.(J, cknd suc:i as 100 year flood plains, many naLlve -"C. OrIiY and opposition are his developments upgraded tot-- we -1,;ck f�,r 1, Scuthlake. L P t S -L.:, ,-cp thIs corporation from holding Sc.,uthlak.e meeting! Send him back to h-,s office, and 17, -c, brinq :j A(j_1i;.y plan that conforms to our Master Land '-:s; Plan and w-.u"d be one ake ::i-.izens could be oroud of! .n addition, the new residential developmen_s .:-9 . east cf that area and back to rile west on Highland is high -quality, mostly I+ acre parcels wltl! homes in eXCeS3 of $300,000-403,000. Those have i.-vested in that corner of Souzhiake would be poorly s_rved cy .av I Lng Ji 4 7 7, rrd' v ho 1_1sing iocazk.d Just around the corner. ncidentalLv, I have lived ir. Sc,.:-hlake for 11 %-ears and 'nar,a mature 'r,:rr. a acing Small town to small city. Much :f our dev,?_'-_r:_ -'s a,:d to look at. Let's be even more particuiar, _ess, wile tn-2 �A_rze_s o_f land we i.av _e[t for development. We have Ive with f'-r a L,*)nq -,ime! n ce-re I _y, Susan Craroy & Steve Hastings 6:7) 329-0541 )scraney@a--:.net Case No. ZA01-092 Attachment F Page 11 Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:09 PM To: therrick@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: multifamily housing t -� zens Oi So a a q a 3� 7i -am f7l doo- -0 , —zifamiiv apar-mer--3, �Iu�:Iexes, r.-- - . - Ja:-AeS and LMa.-v R%mlak SiIa-Acw Gldn Kc Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 12 Lorrie Herrick From: Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:11 PM To: Iherrick@cityofsouthlake.com Subject: KIMBALL PARK DUPLEXES I am writing in oppcsition to the building of the above duplexes. 1 believe these would be a detriment to existing neighborhoods and devalue property nearby. They would also increase traffic on Highland and Kimball which are already heavily traveled. This usage does not conform to the current land use plan and creates an environment which was not envisioned when we moved here seventeen years ago. I would appreciate you vote against this development. Thank you. Sincerely. David Ackerman MD Case No. Attachment F ZA01-092 Page 13 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-381 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF TRACT 2C, TIOMAS MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.1049, BEING 3.267 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO 66MF-1" TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING - ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety. morals and Case No. Attachment G ZA01-092 Page 1 general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and -effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land Case No. Attachment G ZA01-092 Page 2 throughout this City; and, _ WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Case No. Attachment G ZA01-092 Page 3 Texas, passed on the 19th.day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being, A portion ef:Tract 2C, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being 3.267 acres and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural to "MF-1"' Two -Family Residential District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" . SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate iigfifand air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development Case No. Attachment G ZA01-092 Page 4 of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting Case No. Attachment G ZA01-092 Page 5 zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this -ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: Case No. ZA01-092 Attachment G Page 6 CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment G ZA01-092 Page 7 rM at : 11SF.- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (TRACT TWO) BEING a 3.267 acre tract of land situated in the T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0.1049 and being all that certain tract of land described in deed to Schon M. McManus as recorded in Volume 10448. Page 20, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 3.267 acre tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the south right—of—way line of East Highland Street (a variable width right—of—way), said point bears NO2'02'55"E a distance of 16.21 feet and S89'00'0O"E, a distance of 178.84 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition an addition to the City of Scuthlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3583, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S89'00'00"E, along the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 250.01 feet to a point for corner at the intersection of the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street and the west right—of—way line of North Kimball Avenue (a variable width right—of—way); THENCE 500'32'17"W, along the west right—of—way line of said North Kimball Avenue, a distance of 556.19 feet to a point fc,r comer; THENCE N89'19'06"W, leaving the west right—of-way line of said North Kimball Avenue and along the north line of Lot 1, Hanna Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-202, Page 71, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, a distance of 261.02 feet to a point for corner; THENCE N01'40'11"E, leaving the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition, a distance of 557.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 142,291 square feet or 3.267 acres of land. Case No. Attachment G ZAO1-092 Page 8 i EXHIBIT "B" it i j a ills 01, n'l 1��1 1�} si ti:i Ii Ir ie s z ii �M I Ill li= li 1 M., ; " s gig 3 -_---- ' r • �„ I'Izi ,.I �,I a 2 q z �Fro �� I � ��_ _s_ _;.�. �3-a �} �. � air I•'a �E k�3 � - ------------- 1 1 I' --- JI —f--- __ ___{- - __ ___ II_ .. �-- .-- .>->'-' __ ------------ ..'-----J S V W IW I --'---------- �� ; •�'• i+ .ML1f3lSL. tl6KiV Il02 !�['r v � � ti O>1'1 fylf(9Y))131V I I a i I ��1� ,,,• NOLLIO67QY 6IOT'oN NYNMIY :L T L07 1 Case No. Attachment G ZA01-092 Page 9 City of Southlake • ' Department of Planning STAFF REPORT November 1, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-093 PROJECT: Kimball Park Addition REQUEST: On behalf of Schon M. McManus, Four Peaks Development is requesting rezoning. ACTION NEEDED: Consider iirsi reading for rezoning request. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicin!:;-:vlap (C) Surrounding rruperty Owner Map (D) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (E) Ordinance No. 460-382 STAFF CONTACT: Tara i3iuvis �4'0i-�ZC79) Case No. ZA01-093 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Schon M. McManus APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to obtain approval for "SF -IA" single family residential, which the applicant plans to plat into two lots to build two houses. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the south side of E. Highland Street, approximately 250' west of N. Kimball Avenue. HISTORY: There is no recent development history on this property. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Tract 2C, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being 2.315 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential P&Z ACTION: October 18, 2001; Approved (7-0) STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan. N:\CommunityDevelopmendWP-FLLES\MEMO\2000cases\00061SP -new version.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA01-093 Page 1 Vicinity Map Kimball Park Addition 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet lei w 0 Case No. Attachment B ZA01-093 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Kimball Park Addition Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. J. Ellis 1. SF -IA 1. Low Density Residential 1. 0.51 2. L. Pierce 2. SF -IA 2. Low Density Residential 2. 4.10 3. H. Wade 3. SF -IA 3. Low Density Residential 3. 4.35 4. F. Ferguson 4. SF -IA 4. Low Density Residential 4. 2.31 5. W. Massey 5. B-1 5. Mixed Use 5. 4.00 6. S. McManus 6. AG 6. Med. Density esidential 6. 0.46 7. H. Miller 7. AG 7. Mixed Use 7. 1.65 8. Southlake Westerra 8. 0-1 8. Mixed Use 8. 10.5 9. F. Record 9. AG 9. Mixed Use 9. 1.27 10. E. Huning 10. SF -IA 10. Low Density Residential 10. 2.81 11. S. McManus 11. AG 11. Med. Density Residential 11. 3.68 Case No. Attachment C ZA01-093 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Response Kimball Park Addition NOTICES SENT: Eleven (11) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • Mrs. L.R. Pierce, 2130 E. Highland, Southlake, TX., in favor, "Any new development will clean up and enhance the neighborhood. Duplex units will allow an alternative to a $750,000.00 plus "upscale" residence." (Received October 16, 2001) • Eric A. and Mary A. Hun ing, 2145 E. Highland St., Southlake, TX in favor, "power lines down property and traffic on Kimball make the split of these two lots more desirable than they would otherwise be." (Received October 18, 2001) Case No. Attachment D ZA01-093 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 4 6+382 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF TRACT 2C, THOMAS MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1049, BEING 2315 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF -IA"' SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENTIAL=DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY r FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article X1, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG Agricultural Case No. Attachment E ZA01-093 Page 1 under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly Case No. Attachment E ZA01-093 Page 2 requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a portion of Tract 2C, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being 2.315 Case No. Attachment E ZA01-093 Page 3 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" e Agricultural to "SFtA" S%ngl.�amily Residential District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment E ZA01-093 Page 4 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Case No. Attachment E ZA01-093 Page 5 SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the MAYOR ATTEST: day of , 2001. CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment E ZA01-093 Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the MAYOR ATTEST: day of , 2001. CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment E ZA01-093 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (TRACT ONE) BEING a 2.315 acre tract of land situated in the T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.1049 and being all that certain tract of land described in deed to Schon M. McManus as recorded in Volume 10448, Page 20, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 2.315 acre tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the south right—of—way line of East Highland Street (a variable width right—of—way), said point bears NO2'02'55"E a distance of 16.21 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 1 T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3583, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S89'00'00"E, along the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 178.84 feet to a point for corner; THENCE S01'40'11"W, leaving the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 557.66 feet to a point for comer in the north line of Lot 1, Hanna Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-202, Page 71, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N89'19'06"W, along the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition, a distance of 182.55 feet to a point for corner, said point being the southeast corner of said Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition; THENCE NO2'02'55"E, leaving the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition and along the east line of sold Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition, a distance of 558.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 100,848 square feet or 2.315 acres of land. Case No. Attachment E ZA01-093 Page 8 L City of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT November 1, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-094 PROJECT: Kimball Park Addition REQUEST: On behalf of Schon M. McManus, Four Peaks Development is requesting approval of a preliminary plat. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider preliminary plat approval. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Plat Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Tara Brooks (481-2079) Case No. ZA01-094 OWNER: APPLICANT: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Schon M. McManus Four Peaks Development PURPOSE: The purpose of this request to obtain preliminary plat approval for seven residential lots. Zoning change requests are being processed for five "MF-1" lots and two "SF -IA" lots (See cases ZA01-092 and ZA 1-093.) PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located on the southwest corner of East Highland Street and North Kimball Avenue. HISTORY: There is no recent development history on this property. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 2C, Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being 5.582 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District P&Z ACTION: October 18, 2001; Denied (7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated October 12, 2001. NACommunity DevelopmentlWP-FII.ESWEM0\200I cases\01094PP - new version.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA01-094 Page 1 Vicinity Map Kimball Park Addition 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet E S Case No. Attachment B ZA01-094 Pagel a 3 a �! z2 T z !9 9a Z. � � a Ild i a1, Li!i Case No. Attachment C ZA01-094 Pagel PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY �w Case No.: ZA01-094 Review No.: Three Project Name: Preliminary Plat- Kimball Park Addition APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development 726 Commerce Street, Suite 109 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: 817-329-6996 Fax: Date of Review: 10/12/01 SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: McCullah Surveying, Inc. 16531 Addison Road Addison, TX 75001 Phone: (972) 713-9777 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/04/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT TARA BROOKS AT (817) 481-2079. Change the labels for the 25'and 20' Private Access Easements to Common Access Easements. 2. Show and label a 25' Common Access Easement centered over the drive accessing N. Kimball Avenue. 3. All lots must comply with zoning district regulations. The "AG" zoning district requires a minimum 10 acre lot size. An application for an appropriate change of zoning must be approved. Case No. Attachment D ZA01-094 Pagel Surrounding Property Owners Kimball Park Addition Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. J. Ellis 1. SF -IA 1. Low Density Residential 1. 0.51 2. L. Pierce 2. SF-lA 2. Low Density Residential 2. 4.10 3. H. Wade 3. SF -IA 3. Low Density Residential 3. 4.35 4. F. Ferguson 4. SF-lA 4. Low Density Residential 4. 2.31 5. W. Massey 5. B-1 5. Mixed Use 5. 4.00 6. City of Grapevine 6. 6. 6. 7. NVE H, Ltd 7. SF-20A 7. Med. Density Residential 7. 0.45 8. NVE H, Ltd 8. SF-20A 8. Med. Density Residential S. 0.46 9. NVE H, Ltd 9. SF-20A 9. Med. Density Residential 9. 0.49 10. B. Daniel 10. SF-20A 10. Med. Density Residential 10. 0.46 11. NVE H, Ltd 11. SF-20A 11. Med. Density Residential 11. 0.45 12. B. Hugghins 12. SF-20A 12. Med. Density Residential 12. 0.46 13. Southlake Westerra 13. 0-1 13. Mixed Use 13. 10.5 14. H. Miller 14. AG 14. Mixed Use 14. 1.65 15. F. Record 15. AG 15. Mixed Use 15. 1.27 16. E. Huning 16. SF -IA 16. Low Density Residential 16. 2.81 17. S. Mc Manus 17. AG 17. Med. Density Residential 17. 3.68 Case No. Attachment E ZA01-094 Pagel Surrounding Property Owner Response Kimball Park Addition NOTICES SENT: Fourteen (14) RESPONSES: Six (6) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Hazel Miller, 5213 McQuade Street, Haltom City, TX, in favor (Received October 11, 2001) • Schon McManus, 2149 E. Highland, Southlake, TX., in favor, "I believe it will look a lot better than it does now and will draw attention away from the power lines." (Received October 15, 2001) • Cleta Pierce, 2130 E. Highland, Southlake, TX., in favor, "Any new development will clean up and enhance the neighborhood. Duplex units will allow and alternative to a $750, 000.00 "upscale" residence." (Received October 16, 2001) • H. Wayne Wade, 1440 N. Kimball Rd., Southlake, TX., in favor, " All of us along Kimball know that the utility easement did significant damage to our property value and use possibilities. The duplex is an excellent " (Received October 16, 2001) Mary A. Huning, 2145 E. Highland St., Southlake, TX in favor. (Received October 18, 2001) Connie Blackburn, 2009 E. Highland St., Southlake, TX in favor, "I would rather see the upscale duplexes there rather than commercial later on, also Southlake needs this product for older retirees, etc." (Received October 18, 2001) Case No. Attachment F ZA01-094 Pagel City of Southlake �; • • Department of Planning STAFF REPORT November 1, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-108 PROJECT: Tracts 9D1 and 9D8, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521 REQUEST: Mitch and Janet Wolfe are requesting approval for "SF -IA" zoning. ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading rezoning request. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Surrounding Property Owner Map (D) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (E) Ordinance No. 480-383 - STAFF CONTACT: Tara Brooks (481-2079) k Case No. ZA01-108 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: Mitch and Janet Wolfe PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to obtain proper zoning to build one single- family residence. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at 2411 Florence Road, being on the south side of Florence Road approximately 1000'west of Randol Mill Avenue. HISTORY: There is no recent development history on this property. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 9D1 and 9D8, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, being 3.264 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential P&Z ACTION: October 18, 2001; Approved (7-0) STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-lA" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan. N:\Community Development,WP-FILESWEMO\2000cases\0006 i SP - new version.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA01-108 Page 1 Vicinity Map J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition Tracts 9D1, 9D8 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet luf N S 10, Case No. Attachment B ZA01-108 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition Owner i. City of Keller 2. M. Wolfe 3. R. Haverkamp 4. J. Gaffney 5. N. Gill 6. G. Kuennen 7. J. Knight S. J. Almendinger 9. R. Pekowski Tracts 9D1, 9D8 Zoning Land Use Acreage 2. AG 1. 2. Low Density Residential 2. 2.26 3. SF -IA 3. Low Density Residential 3. 3.92 4. SF -IA 4. Low Density Residential 4. 1.17 5. SF -IA 5. Low Density Residential 5. 1.13 6. SF -IA 6. Low Density Residential 6. 1.13 7. SF -IA 7. Low- Density Residential 7. 1.09 8. SF -IA 8. Low Density Residential 8. 1.43 9. SF -IA 9. Low- Density Residential 9. 3.68 Case No. Attachment C ZA01-108 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Response J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition Tracts 9D1, 9D8 NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received from within the 200' notification area: • See following response. Case No. Attachment D ZA01-108 Page 1 REFERENCE NO.: ZA01-108 I am undecided about the request for the following reasons: The owners of the property at2411 Florence Road have hauled in tons and tons of dirt, elevating the lot much higher than it was before their purchase of the land. This has caused dirt to run off onto other lots and has gone on for months No silt fencing was originally put up until a complaint was made to the city. My husband helped the property owner put up the silt fence and he was very angry that anyone had complained. My next door neighbor has had dirt up on her patio and the people next to her have had dirt run on to their property. During one rain the red colored muddy water could be tracked all the way to 1709. We have notgotten sewage lines in our area yet and everyone is concerned that all the runoff could, cause problems with septic tanks After building the lot up higher and higher, the owners then built a huge metal barn (approx. 80 x 50 feet) which is now up in the air overlooking my backyard Driving down our street, Hillside Ct. you can see their barn over our property (our lot is about an acre). The property owner across the street from me has complained that the barn is so tall that is unsightly for the entire area. lam also concerned that an old trailer has been brought onto the lot on the west side of the barn and people seem to be living in it. There are lights on at night and a TV antenna and disk, so I don't think it is being used by construction workers I don't know if it is legal to have a trailer like this on a property and I hope it will be removed when the home is completed. I don't really oppose the owner being able to build a house on the land,- when we purchased our house we felt whoever was financially able to buy that large a property would probably place a nice home on it. We just didn't expect them to haul in tons and tons of dirt then use the AG zoning to build a huge metal barn right behind our property. The barn looks like an industrial factory -type building right in a residential area. Where as I Deborah Kuennen, being the owner of the property located at 2404 Hillside Ct, hereby duly note our opinion, as shown above, of the referenced zoning change. SIGNATURE: Z, It: i?m Printed Name: D-F&R,411 KC/4FiUNEAl WC'D OCT � 2001 Case No. Attachment D ZA01-108 Page 2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS .................. . ORDINANCE NO. 480-383 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AiMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 9D1 AND 9D8, J.J. FRESHOUR ABSTRACT NO: 521, BEING 3.264 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural Case No. Attachment E ZA01-108 Page 1 District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly Case No. Attachment E ZA01-108 Page 2 requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from tire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: �w Being Tracts 9D 1 and 9D8, J.J. Freshour, and more fully and completely described in Case No. Attachment E ZA01-108 Page 3 Exhibit "A" from "AG"Agricultuml District to "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment E ZA01-108 Page 4 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Case No. Attachment E ZA01-108 Page 5 SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment E ZA01-108 Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the MAYOR ATTEST: day of , 2001. CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment E ZA01-108 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Beginning at a P.K. nail set in the centerline of Florence: Road (60' R.U.W.) and heing per deLd cal 933.80 tact west from the northeast corner of said J. J. Freshour Survey 'l'l-IF.NC1 S 00 1 1' 21 " Ii, at 30.00 feet passing a 112 iron rod found, also being the nortli%vc t comer of Lot 3, J. J. Freshour No. 521 Addition, an addition to'the City of Southlake as riled in Cabinet A, Slide 1540 Plat Records of Tarrant County, 'texas and continuing along the west Property line of said 1,ot 3 in all 723.671'eet to a 1/2" iron rcxi set with cap in the north line of Hillside Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake as fikxl in Volume 388-18 1, Page 6 THE:NC1: N 89 35' 21 " W, 196.45 feet along north line of said Hillside l'?states to a l /2" iron rekl tuund and bring the southc ast comer of 1,611, Block l Brewerton Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as tiled in Cabinet 13, Slide 15911I.R."f,C.T.; 'n 11, NC E N 00, 11' 18".W along east lute ut said Bre verton Addition at 691.83 feet town iron piii found -and of693 8;I Pcct ping a 11�" iconsod set �ytthcap;and continuing in a11721§3 filet to a PX, nail .set in the c:enteftihi o!'Florencc;Road,: : v. . ,I,jU"'1 CF 5�89 # 35":F,,195,4d faeftalhe Paint rif Deg�nning xnd'cunfniiting in all 142168 square feet or 3.264 acr'es'of ]anti, Case No. Attachment E ZA01-108 Page 8 City of Southlake r • ' a Department of Planning STAFF REPORT November 1, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-112 PROJECT: 1207 and 1209 Timber Court in Continental Park Estates REQUEST: Pat & Beth Nolen and Robert & Irene Castro are requesting approval for "SF -IA" zoning. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider approval of zoning change request. :ATTACHMENTS: (.?) Background Infor►nation (B) Vicinity Map (C) Surrounding Property Owner Map (D) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (E) Ordinance No. 480-384 STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086) BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANTS: Pat & Beth Nolen and Robert & Irene Castro PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to change the zoning to allow the keeping of horses. PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located at 1207 and 1209 Timber Court in Continental Park Estates. HISTORY: A final plat was approved by the City on April 22, 1975. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, Continental Park Estates LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "SF-20B" Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District P&Z ACTION: October 18, 2001; Approved (7-0) STAFF COMMENTS: A change of zoning to the "SF -IA" single family district does not require a concept plan. Case No. Attachment A ZA01-112 Page 1 Vicinity Map Continental Park Estates Block 2, Lots 3 and 4 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet tiU N S E Case No. Attachment B ZA01-112 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Continental Park Estates RlnrV 1 T .ntc 'A 5knd d Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. R. Castsro 1. SF-20A 1. Med. Density Residential 1. 1.84 2. P. Nolen 2. SF-20A 2. Med. Density Residential 2. 3.16 3. M. Wood 3. SF-20A 3. Med. Density Residential 3. 3.10 4. G. Bender 4. SF-20A 4. Med. Density Residential 4. 2.47 - 5. M. Doan 5. SF-20A 5. Med. Density Residential 5. 1.01 6. R. Johnson 6. SF-20A 6. Med. Density Residential 6. 2.36 7. C. Sturgis 7. CS 7. Med. Density Residential 7. 0.54 8. L. Samartin 8. SF-20A 8. Med. Density Residential 8. 1.26 9. L. Samartin 9. SF-20A 9. Med. Density Residential 9. 2.16 10. City of Colleyville Case No. Attachment C ZA01-112 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Reponses , W Continental Park Estates Block 2, Lots 3 and 4 Notices Sent: Nine (9) Responses: None Case No. Attachment D ZA01-112 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO.480-384 AN ORDINANCE -AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 2, CONTINENTAL PARK ESTATES, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.0 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF-20B" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-20B" Single Family Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person Case No. Attachment E ZA01-112 Page 1 or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood: location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of17 public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their Case No. Attachment E ZA01-112 Page 2 original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation. water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, Continental Park Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-98, Page 23, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 5.0 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF-20B" Single Family Residential District to "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District. Case No. Attachment E ZA01-112 Page 3 SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the•zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Case No. Attachment E ZA01-112 Page 4 Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid; the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. .any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public Case No. Attachment E ZA01-112 Page 5 hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance sh-ll be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2001. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment E ZA01-112 Page 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment E ZA01-112 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, Continental Park Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant Countv, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-98, Page 23, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 5.0 acres Case No. Attachment E ZA01-112 Page 8 4 3 CASE NO: ZA01-101 City of Southlake Denartment of Planning STAFF REPORT November 1, 2001 PROJECT: Shyam-Hari Estates REQUEST: On behalf of Jav Sabhaya, Adams Consulting Engineers, Inc. is requesting approval of a preliminary plat. y ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing - 2. Consider preliminary plat approval. AT--, ACHMF�NITS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Plat Review Summary (E) Surrounding Property Owner Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner's Responses (G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council iWembers Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086) Case No. ZA01-101 BACKGROUND INFORMATION �w OWNER: Jay Sabhaya APPLICANT: Adams Consulting Engineers, Inc. PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to subdivide approximately 10 acres into 8 lots. PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located at 930 East Dove Street, on the north side of East Dove Street approximately 177.22' east of Victoria Lane. HISTORY: There has been no recent development activity on this property. A house currently exits on the lot. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Being Tract 2D1 of the J.L. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 384, and being approximately 10.016 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: CURRENT ZONING TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Case No. ZA01-101 Low Density Residential "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District Mastser Thouroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends that E. Dove Street to be a 5- lane, undivided arterial street with 94' of right-of-way. Adequate R.O.W. has been dedicated by the applicant on the plat. Existing_ Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed subdivision will have one access directly onto E. Dove Street. The applicant is proposing a residential cul-de-sac being 1085' in length with 50' of right-of-way. E. Dove Street is currently a 2-lane, undivided roadway serving as the major east -west thoroughfare for properties north of SH 114. May, 2001 traffic counts on E. Dove Street (between White Chapel Bl and Carroll Ave): Table #1 24hr West Bound (WB) (1,950) East Bound (EB) (1,724) WB Peak A.M. (324) 7-8 a.m. Peak P.M. (182) 5-6 p.m. EB Peak A.M. (133) 8-9 a.m. Peak P.M. (235) 5-6 p.m. J Traffic Impact Attachment A Page 1 WATER & SEWER: ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: P&Z ACTION: STAFF COMMENTS: Case No. ZA01-101 Use # Lots I V d* AM -IN AM -OUT PM -IN PM -OUT Residential 8 77 __ 2 5 i 5 3 *Vehicle Trips Per Day *The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on E. Dove Street. E. Dove Street carries approximately 3,674 vehicles with the peak traffic times occurring between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. in the morning and between 5 p.m. and 6 p.m. in the evening. The subdivision will generate 7 vehicle trips during the A.I. rush hour and 8 vehicle trips during the P.M. rush hour. There is an existing 6" water line on the south side of E. Dove Street. There is an existing 6" sanitary sewer along the north property line. Table #3 Water $14,869.12 (assumes 8 - 1" simple meters) Wastewater $9,265.92 (assumes 8 - 1" simple meters) Roadway $11,965.36 (assumes 8 residential units) * Final Impact Fees are determined by the building Services Uepartment at the time or mitamg permit issuance. The fees shown above only represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. October 18, 2001; Approved (7-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated October 12, 2001. Attached is Preliminary Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated October 12, 2001. Attachment A Page 2 Vicinity -Map Shyam-Hari Estates 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet Wj Case No. ZA01-101 N S E Case No. Attachment B ZA01-101 Page 1 ltlLQ IL4t0 l • (IrBIL V iY SU33JIfJPH lV ' lW'J -jM'stsmqnNj 'muinSNO3 SvmV i71d At[VNiWT138d S3 LV1.S3 RMH - WVAHS F ;I� W ?dial . iYt 3dtE+j s4 �1:.��j ii1; `uj tn - 3 - •{�'��° r�E37j' �:ti�a i3 �t �i �g__.. �F !: �� tom, � I � i• 2s 2a �;:.�}d• •g2ts�a? t �� ]., �.�� ! �-- - .t -- ---i qq �a y4�3 st33°��: � �a i�aj i�j'�23 4� �♦ .�� I j i � -�_n �I ��I ; i Si•,� ! I ----------- cu ce d cad �- n a a �� o --ara•� �------------ Q� •� } w a �' � n � m 9 2eu i �evy � 7 sr i W � ui y IL m w 1 tL QI Case No. ZA01-101 Attachment C Page 1 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA01-101 Review No.: Three Project Name: Preliminary Plat — Shyam-Hari Estates APPLICANT: Jay Sabhaya 2512 E. Shady Grove Rd., # 15 Irving, TX 75060 Phone: (972) 579-0211 Fax: (972) 554-0066 Date of Review: 10/12/01 ENGINEER: Adams Consulting Engineers Rob Adams, P.E. 2445 E. Southlake Blvd, Suite 100 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 329-6990 Fax: (817) 329-7671 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10i 11/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086. The applicant has met the requirements of previous reviews and is consistent with the City's ordinance requirements. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS * Arrangements for removal of the existing structures must be made with the Building Department prior to issuance of any building permits on the affected lots. * Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final plat must be approved and filed in the County records and all permit fees paid. This would include, but not be limited to, street, water, and sewer impact fees, tap and park dedication fees. * Prior to construction of any public infrastructure (streets, water, sewer or drainage structures) a developer's agreement must be processed through the Public Works Department and approved by City Council and associated fees paid. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA01-101 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Shyam-Hari Estates Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. R. Johnson 1. SF -IA 1. Low Density Residential 1. 1.35 2. S. Jefferies 2. SF -IA 2. Low Density Residential 2. 1.51 3. T. Hendrix 3. SF -IA 3. Low Density Residential 3. 2.07 4. A. Johnson 4. SF -IA 4. Low Density Residential 4. 2.00 5. G. Braddock 5. SF -IA 5. Low Density Residential 5. 1.22 6. J. Thomas 6. SF -IA 6. Low Density Residential 6. 1.00 7. Carroll, Isd 7. CS 7. Public/Semi-Public 7. 15.0 8. M. Clark 8. SF -IA 8. Low Density Residential 8. 1.99 9. C. Gonser 9. SF -IA 9. Low Density Residential 9. 1.99 10. L. Worley 10. AG 10. Low Density Residential 10. 1.65 11. W. Carter 11. SF -IA 11. Low Density Residential 11. 1.65 12. J. Hawkins 12. AG 12. Low Density Residential 12. 1.91 13, M. Long 13. SF -IA 13. Low Density Residential 13. 1.5 14. G. McCormick 14. -SF-IA 14. Low Density Residential 14. 1.5 15. S. Bastian 15. SF -IA 15. Low Density Residential 15. 1.5 16. R. Clowdus 16. SF -IA 16. Low Density Residential 16. 1.5 17. W. Brandt 17, SF -IA 17. Low Density Residential 17. 1.5 18. S. Pye 18. SF -IA 18. Low Density Residential 18. 10.0 Case No. Attachment E ZA01-101 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Response Shyam-Hari Estates NOTICES SENT: Eighteen (18) RESPONSES: Four responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Larry Jo Worley, 925 East Dove Road, Southlake, TX in favor, " I am in favor of the request for the Shaym-Hari Estates." (Received October 10, 2001) • Steve and Debra Bastian, 805 Victoria Lane, Southlake, TX, opposed, "We want the name changed to fit the area better. In light of the terrorist attack please change the name. The neighbors have given the owners new name suggestions. Please find something different." (Received October 17, 2001) • Gene McCormick, 803 Victoria Lane, Southlake, TX, opposed, "Only reason: Name of addition does not meld with those in close proximity. Anything similar to existing names is preferred." (Received October 18, 2001) • Dawn Johnson, 1005 Quail Run Rd., Southlake, TX, undecided, "I am not opposed to the property being developed, but we are concerned about the "type" or style of homes to be built AND we are NOT HAPPY with the NAME of this development. Given all that has happened in the U.S. in the past month, this particular name is inappropriate and would not be a good choice. (Received October 19, 2001) Two (2) responses were received from outside of the 200' notification area: • Stephen J. Oren, 702 Harry Court, Southlake, Tx., is undecided. See attached. Received October 18, 2001. • Philip Burke Hand, 806 Victoria Lane, Southlake, TX., is opposed. See attached. Received October 18, 2001. Case No. Attachment F ZA01-101 Page 1 (C I far( v uI . c�xas j 7) 42-4-2 77" I'S.1ow,".1"I :[!m �Cpienlb,er 28, _11)w %1!-. jotu) Assistant (-';t% Munil—oe:- Dedf. %1r. !�,_Jen: he attached letter Is ti>ntit>rdzd to ")U S�) that the City 1)[-SoUtfilake �cOUid be aikary of file actions residents ot'llunt",ick f-.sUlles 11.'Ve taken in rcqL1CStin,,_, the develt)ncr of Shyrain-1 furi Esutles to renilrile his I '2 need io do awthino :ix in this oildeavor. please nooiv me sv that i -el"idcnts M'HUntwck E'ST"Ifes, �w All willylent: Letter to Jai ipr-rn r - Case No. Attachment F ZA01-101 Page 2 Stephen J. Oren 702 Ham t "Ourt =iuthlak�. l.za� 76i;v, k,-atutii: t: aI_L5 A?,r.."'lol cow L ))#lava C3(!ve Road Si`�Uthi ikv. i X 7606 ;rarr)-linri fatale, �r, me sari cr (t,. �t}t}1 n:K si :,ftJtr 1luniwnk r_sidint, attended a .SI'I meeting .vherct you ntrt3duccd a new residential do veltaprnent. Sftvram-Bari Estates. "ffte input from residents was reatrded by the Sl>IN Leader, Jan Francis_ who stated that our input would be forwarded c 1 raised the mime ofthe de),elopmcnt its an %' issue. You Indicated that " might recorsidcr the n:arne of (fie development, but had already had other names turned down by the cite. l promised �? research the issue turd pro%ide input to ti"ou sin ifut �-ou may decide whether or not to Inc cicZci+,nttterlr s name. NI". Fim Hintz researched the minces ofSouthlake deveh�?mcnt. �Lnd f `t ire attached that. list to this fetter. I cainassed residents on September 16. 2001 and asked then) 1`617 input. I ne following resulted in that endeavor, ar t o ail_ 1 don t like challenginf, your entrepreneurial right to legally do with this propert,: what kou wish. howe)rer, 1 alon- with other residents of liuitt4ktck believe the• naine of'the dckciopment. Shyrwn-i-iari Estates, does not tit the surrounding area and may atlea t our property values in the future. I respectfully request that the name be changed to so that it blends with cxisting e�.elopments. Residents identified the tulk�wur� names f6r consideration. The name; appear rr no order, of`priority and now appear on the list Of exislifIL Sotuhkake develomlent [rune,. `aa�ec•ste�i i)evelo^�rtent Vanu•, fhc OA, ol"Southlake .sr I he t7aks Dw, Q Nt,lltrvk Lstalc;, \lorning Doke Fstates >tutsCt Oak E states Old Longhorn Ranch Dwn e tiieadow Estates Lie :nisn :ugLest that changin, the manic may ennar-c� :utr markciin runpaign )rat �ot_i 1n:pIC+ . ` --y-'.�iL�t_ (c. Huni-.kick Residents and Mr, John t iWiert, (!r" "ruthlak-, Case No. Attachment F ZA01-101 Page 3 Named Developments 1 Bent Creek 2 Brenwyck-Timmron 3 Brewer Addition 4 Briarwood 5 Brittany Place 6 Brock Addition 7 Bryson Square 8 Burney Place 9 Cambridge Place 10 Carmel Bay 11 Carroll Medows 12 Cedar Creek Plantation 13 Cedar Oaks 14 Chapel Downs 15 Chesapeake Place 16 Chimney Hill 17 Cimmaron Acres 18 Clariden Ranch 19 Continenal Park Estates 20 Country Walk 21 Coventry Manor 22 Crescent Royale-Timmron 23 Cross Timbers Hills 24 Diamond Circle 25 Dominion 26 Dove Acres 27 Dove Estates 28 Eagles Bend-Timmaron 29 Emerald Estates 30 Evergreen 31 Fox Hollow 32 Foxborough 33 Garden Addition 34 Ginger Creek 35 Giendover-Timmaron 36 Glenwyck Farms 37 Grace Estates 38 Harbor Oaks 39 Heatherwood 40 Highland 41 Hillside 42 Hilltop Acres 43 Hillwood Estates 44 Hudson Bay Named Developments 45 Hughes Addition 46 Hunters Ridge 47 Huntly, Manor-Timmaron 48 Huntwick 49 Huse Homeplace 50 Indian Creek 51 Indian Oaks 52 Jellico Estates 53 Kirkwood Hollow 54 Knight Addition 55 Lake Crest 56 Lakes of La Paloma 57 Lakewood Acres 58 Lakewood Ridge 59 Latrobe Addition 60 Lauretwood Park 61 Loch Medow 62 Loma Vista 63 Lonesome Dove 64 McPherson Place 65 Meadow Oaks 66 Mission Hills 67 Monticello 68 Myers Meadow 69 Napa Valley 70 Oak Hill 71 Oakwood 72 Old Orchard Country Estates 73 Park Place 74 Parra Linda 75 Pearson Addition 76 Pecan Acres 77 Phesant Ridge 78 Princeton Park 79 Quail Creek 80 Rainforest Addition 81 Randol Mill 82 Raven Bend 83 Ravenaux Place 84 Regal Oaks 85 Ridgewood 86 Royal Oaks B7 Shadow Creek 88 Shropshire Addition 9116101 Named Developments 89 South Hollow 90 South Lake Park 91 South Ridge Lakes 92 Southview 93 Stanhope Addition 94 Steward Estates 95 Stone Lakes 96 Strathmore-Timmaron 97 Summer Place Addition 98 Sunshine Place 99 The Renaissance 100 The Trailhead 101 The Woods 102 Timberline Estates 103 Timmaron 104 Trail Creek 105 Twin Creeks 106 Twin Lakes 107 Versailles 108 Vista Trail 109 Wakefield Addition 110 Warrick Green-Timmaron 111 Whispering Deli 112 White Chapel Place 113 Whitener Addition 114 Wilmington Court 115 Winding Creek Estates 116 Woodall Addition 117 Woodland Heights 118 Worthing Addition 119 Worthington Addition 120 Wyndsor Creek-T-unmaron 121 Wyndsor Grove-Timmaron Southlake Names Case No. Attachment F ZA01-101 Page 4 PHILIP BURKE HAND Octc htr IS, '_001 Planning. &. lonin,Y Ccr,inlis.irni !+X) Main Street Soutlllake, TX'E><)92 RE?: LA01-101 Preiiminx-v Plat tc,r S;;vam-Hari ) states Oe:li v;Ir" this 1::.'.ter, I aill S111 tnittin;; my and my wiir: s oppositi{fin to tiamin.E tht abt v't referenced development "Slivani-Hari Estates." I would respectfuily request that the ,,wrier of the development rename the development to be more in line with other development names in the area. It is my understandin, that the mrier has been presented with Seeral options and has rejected those options in favor of the above name. I would ask that he reconsider naming the development and if netc! be search for additional names that milaht tll�et with h-i; approv'al that art (More in line with the current ievelopment names IL tcd for &)UL llakr.. Thant: you tur your consuicration. Respectfu ltv, PU p Hand • �v iJ y 'J .� ... Y. L., V V f Silo VICTORIA LANE, SO'_ITHLAKE. TX 7r)09= PHON E: 8 I "?- i -79-7004 Case No. Attachment F ZA01-101 Page 5 City of Southlake r Iiij Department of Planning STAFF -REPORT November 1, 2001 CASE NO: ZA01-099 PROJECT: Autumn Glen Estates _ _ REQUEST: On behalf of James and Brenda Haltom, Four Peaks Development is requesting consideration of a revised preliminary plat dated October 26, 2001 for City Council review. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Consider a revised preliminary plat of Autumn Glen Estates. ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Informaticii (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plat Review Summary (D) Letter from City Engineer's office dated October 26, 2001 (attached). (E) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ben Bryner (481-2086) Case No. ZA01-099 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: James and Brenda Haltom APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to subdivide approximately 96 acres into 83 residential lots. PROPERTY SITUATION: This property is located between the east side of North Carroll Avenue and the west side of Sunshine Lane, approximately 500' south of East Dove Street. HISTORY: City Council approved a change of zoning to "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District on August 21, 2001. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: This property is legally described as Tracts 3A 1 G3, 3A 1 G, 3A 1 G5, 3A 1 G 1, 3A1G2, 3A1G4, 3A1F1, 5B3, 5B, 5B2A, 5B2, 4E, and 4, Frances Throop Survey Abstract No. 1511; being 95.9 acres. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "SF -IA" Single Family Residential TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends that N. Carroll Avenue be a 3- lane, undivided arterial street with 94' of R.O.W. Adequate R.O.W. has been dedicated. The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends that Dove Street be a 5-lane, undivided arterial street with 94' of R.O.W. Currently, both these projects are not listed as' a CIP project. Existinz Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed subdivision currently shows two (2) accesses directly onto N. Carroll Avenue and one (1) access onto Sunshine Lane. N. Carroll Avenue currently is a 2-lane, undivided collector street. It will be expanded to a 3-lane, undivided arterial with enough R.O.W. to be a 5-lane arterial if needed. Sunshine Lane is a 2-lane, undivided local street. There are no plans for major improvements to this street. Case No. Attachment A ZA01-099 Page 1 May, 2001 traffic counts on N. Carroll Avenue (between Highland and Dove Street): Table #1 24hr North Bound (NB) (2,089) South Bound (SB) (2,303) NB Peak A.M. (193) 8-9 a.m. Peak P.M. (227) 3-4 p.m. SB Peak A.M. (304) 7-8 a.m. Peak P.M. (188) 3-4 p.m. May, 2001 traffic counts on Dove Street (between Carroll and Kimball Street): Table #2 24hr West Bound (WB) (2,679) East Bound (EB) (2,719) WB Peak A.M. (196) 7-8 a.m. Peak P.M. (385) 6-7 p.m. EB Peak A.M. (324) 7-8 a.m. Peak P.M. (229) 5-6 p.m. Traffic Impact Use # Lots Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM- OUT Residential Homes 83 795 16 48 54 31 *Vehicle Trips Per Day *The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on N. Carroll Avenue and Sunshine Lane combined. The proposed development will generate 64 vehicle trips during the A.M. rush hour and 85 vehicle trips during the P.M. rush hour. Master Trail Plan The Southlake Pathways Master Plan indicates an eight (8) foot multi -use trail along the east side of Carroll Avenue and a natural multi -use trail along the Dove Creek flood plain. WATER & SEWER: There is an existing 6" water line on the west side of N. Carroll Ave. and an existing 8" sanitary sewer line along Dove Creek. There is an existing 8" water line on the east side of Sunshine Lane. The developer will be required to build a 12" water line beginning at the existing 12" line located at the north property line of Johnson Elementary. It will need to extend to the north property line of this site along N. Carroll Ave. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: Huitt-Zollars, the engineer for the developer of Autumn Glen Addition has submitted a drainage study which includes HEC I and HEC 11 computer runs. These are computer programs that model the creek and provide water surface elevations and floodway width for different quantities of flow for different flood frequencies. We have reviewed these calculations with the engineer and we are in agreement with their procedures and corresponding results. Case No. ZA01-099 Attachment A Page 2 ESTIMATED IMPACT FEES*: The engineering calculations show that detaining stormwater run-off from this developed site actually increases the peak discharges along this section of creek. The reason is that the development area is in the lower part of the watershed and by detaining the run-off from the site slows the run-off into the creek and adds to the peak discharge coming down the watershed from the top of the watershed. It is much better to allow the run-off from this developed area to flow on down the creek ahead of the peak discharge. The engineering calculations also show that the water surface elevations are increased approximately 0.10 of a foot by the proposed development. This is not considered to be a significant increase from the existing. The manner in which the stormwater run-off from the developed property is discharged into the creek will be of concern to Public Works and will be addressed in the preparation of construction plans. The developer's engineer, Huitt-Zollars, has submitted the engineering calculations to be sent to FEMA for approval of "Letter of Map Revision". These will be sent to FEMA by the City and a "Letter of Map Revision" must be received from FEMA prior to approval of the final plat. CT/kw rr 1.1,. 412 1 al tV Tr.., - "- Water $154,267.12 (assumes 83 —1" simple meters) Wastewater $96,133.92 (assumes 83 — 1" simple meters) Roadway $124,140.61 (assumes 83 residential units) * Final Impact Fees are detertntned by the nuuamg aerviccs i.cYaiuucuL a. u............. permit issuance. The fees shown above only represent estimates prepared by the Planning Department. P&Z ACTION: October 4, 2001; Approved (5-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated September 28, 2001, granting variance to trail along Dove Road and requiring maintenance access as specified in #2 but not the pedestrian access. COUNCIL ACTION: October 16, 2001; Approved (5-1-1) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated September 28, 2001; granting the variance to the multi -use trail along Dove Creek required by the Southlake Pathways Master Plan but, subject to the following: • A street be dedicated and constructed which connects the east and west sides of the development which would connect Roadway F to Roadway A along an alignment which is somewhere along and between Lots 13, 14, & 15, on the Sunshine Lane side of the development; and Lots 9, 10, 11 on the Carroll side of the development which will connect two sides from east to west and providing a stub out north to a future connection to Dove Road on the northern most edge at a location to be determined by the developer. Case No. Attachment A ZA01-099 Page 3 development; and Lots 9, 10, 11 on the Carroll side of the development which will connect two sides from east to west and providing a stub out north to a future connection to Dove Road on the northern most edge at a location to be determined by the developer. "I believe there is a health, safety and welfare issue, for access to the Sunshine Side of the development and to the Carroll side of the development and I believe it to be for the benefit of the residents of the subdivision to allow fire and police access to the development". (Standerfer) October 30, 2001; Approved to Table (4-0-1) to the Regular City Council Meeting held on November 5, 2001. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Preliminary Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated September 28, 2001. A variance has been granted for the trail required along Dove Creek. REVISIONS TO PRELIMINARY PLAT #ZA01-099 * A street stub with a temporary street turnaround easement has been provided on street C to the property to the east. The turnaround easement will be abandoned when a street connection has been made to Dove Street: * A 40'street easement with a 24' foot wide asphalt paving has been provided between Lots 10 & 11 of Block B and Lots 15 & 16 of Block D to connect the two halves of the subdivision. The street will have a `low-water crossing' across Dove Creek. In lieu of the `low water crossing' the applicant has proposed a 24' wide `emergency access easement' along the south property line of Block D to connect Sunshine Lane and Street F. This will provide a second access into the area of the subdivision east of Dove Creek. The easement will be gated and equipped with an Opticom device for emergency vehicle access. The gate and easement design will be compatible with the subdivision and surrounding properties. (See City Engineer's comments) * An "open space & common area easement" has been dedicated to the H.O.A. and is planned to be a private park and nature trail. The area is in the flood plain south of the proposed street easement. Case No. Attachment A ZA01-099 Page 4 Vicinity Map Autumn Glen Estates 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet Im 0 Case No. Attachment B ZA01-099 Page 1 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA01-099 Revised Review No.: Two Project Name: Preliminary Plat — Autumn Glen Estates APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development David McMahan 726 Commerce Street, Suite 109 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817)329-6996 Fax: (817) 481-4074 Date of Review: 10/26/01 ENGINEER: Huitt Zollars, Inc. 3131 McKinney Avenue, Suite 600 Dallas, TX 75204 Phone: (214) 871-3311 Fax: (214) 871-0757 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/26/01 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086. Provide a natural, multi -use trail along Dove Creek in accordance with the Southlake Pathways Master Plan. Provide a minimum 20' pedestrian access easement centered on the trail, which should be located between floodway and the flood plain limit, and provide the pedestrian access easement along the common lot lines of Lots 10 & 11, Block B and lots 15 & 16, Block D (Variance granted at the October 16, 2001 City Council meeting). 2. Provide a minimum 20' maintenance access easements along the common lot lines of Lots 10 & 11, Block B and lots 15 & 16, Block D, intersecting the floodway easement. REVISIONS TO PRELIMINARY PLAT #ZA01-099-Submitted October 26, 2001 A street stub with a temporary street turnaround easement has been provided on street C to the property to the east. The turnaround easement will be abandoned when a street connection has been made to Dove Street. A 40'street easement with a 24' foot wide asphalt paving has been provided between Lots 10 & 11 of Block B and Lots 15 & 16 of Block D to connect the two halves of the subdivision. The street will have a `low-water crossing' across Dove Creek. In lieu of the `low water crossing', the applicant has proposed a 24' wide `emergency access easement' along the south property line of Block D to connect Sunshine Lane and Street F. This will provide a second access into the area of the subdivision east of Dove Creek. The easement will be gated and equipped with an Opticom device for emergency vehicle access. The gate and easement design will be compatible with the subdivision and surrounding properties. (See City Engineer's comments) An "open space & common area easement" has been dedicated to the H.O.A. and is planned to be a private park and nature trail. The area is in the flood plain south of the proposed street easement. Case No. Attachment C ZA01-099 Page 1 Park Board Recommendation: The Park Board has recommended that the applicant set aside two acres of private common area and construct standard amenity and playground equipment to satisfy the $124,500 park dedication fee. Park dedications are required as public dedications. City Ordinances do not require dedication of "private common areas" or "open space" under this zoning_ district. Private dedications and improvements only qualify for maximum 50% credit for park dedication fees. The City Parks Department recommends dedication of fees rather than land. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS * The 30' and 50' ingress/egress easements are private easements that must be abandoned by the individual holder(s). The abandonment instrument information must be provided on the final plat. * The subdivision will need to comply with "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District development regulations. * Although there are a few lot lines that are not perpendicular or radial, they appear to meet the intent of this requirement. It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 `LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone' requiring construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Additionally, the `Avigation Easement and Release' shown in Appendix 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 should be executed on subsequent Plats to be filed in the County Plat Records. A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees, off -site sewer extensions, off -site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. Case No. Attachment C ZA01-099 Page 2 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM October 11, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (x-1527) SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Community Services with Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) Action Requested: City Council consideration for renewal of the agreement for community services. Background Information: Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) was organized as a non- profit corporation in November 1999 and a board of directors established. Since then, CARS has established its operating policies, recruited and trained volunteer drivers, and established a dispatch system. CARS provides transportation services to the disabled and senior population of the community. CARS has requested funding for FY 2001-2002 of $15,000, a decrease from the FY 2000-2001 request of $18,000. Currently, the City is also providing office space for CARS at the DPS Facility, and the CARS ramp equipped van is stored in the DPS Facility parking lot. Financial Considerations: CARS has requested $15,000 to be paid for services rendered to the senior and disabled population of the community. The approved FY 2001-2002 Community Services division budget has allocated $57,150 for community services. This request is within the budgeted amount. Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Southlake Senior Advisory Commission has unanimously voted to support the CARS program. The Southlake Seniors Steering Committee also voted to support this program. Southlake Senior Activity Center participants support this service and have submitted letters to staff (included in packet). (b) for personal need, including necessary essentials, i.e., to and from the grocery store, drug store, bank, personal grooming, social activities, etc., located within a seven (7) mile radius- of the Southlake Senior Activity Center. (3) CARS shall not be obligated to transport disabled individuals for whom CARS is unable to provide safe transportation. (4) CARS shall operate solely in accordance with its bylaws as follows: (a) Volunteer drivers who use their own vehicles shall provide the transportation services. CARS shall recruit, qualify, and train these drivers. (b) CARS drivers shall also use the ramp equipped minivan, owned by CARS, when necessary to transport wheelchair or power chair bound individuals or when a suitable volunteer owned vehicle is not available. (c) Transportation services will be provided Monday through Friday during the hours between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, or by special arrangement. (d) Transportation normally will be scheduled at least 24 hours prior to departure. (5) CARS will maintain detailed records of qualified persons served, trip destinations and mileage driven, driver and other qualifications, revenues received, and cost and expenses incurred. B. CITY shall provide the following: (1) City agrees to publicize and encourage use of the services of CARS within selected current City mailings, on the City's Cable Television Channel and other means at the discretion of the City. (2) City shall name a staff contact person to serve as a liaison between City and CARS. (3) $750 for an insurance premium to have the City named as an additional insured on CARS automobile liability insurance coverage. Billy Campbell, City Manager October 31, 2001 Page 2 Steve Lakin, Chairman of the Executive Board of CARS has reviewed and approved the FY 2001-2002 Agreement. Legal Review: This agreement was modeled after the standard community services agreement utilized by the City. Alternatives: • Changes in funding amount as determined by City Council • Non -renewal of community services agreement Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: • Agreement for Community Services • CARS Statistical Data • Senior Advisory Commission Minutes - 9/11/01 • Support Letter from Senior Advisory Commission • Support Letters from Senior Activity Center Participants Staff Recommendation: City Council consideration of the proposed Community Services Agreement between CARS and City of Southlake. KH AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AND CALL A RIDE OF SOUTHLAKE, INC. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Southlake, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation located in Tarrant County and Denton County, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized Mayor (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc., a non-profit corporation of Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized Chairman (hereinafter referred to as "CARS"), an organization exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. WHEREAS, the mission of CARS is to provide non -emergency transportation to senior citizens and disabled adult persons ("qualified persons"); and WHEREAS, City and CARS desire to enter into a Renewal Agreement whereby CARS will continue to provide free non -emergency transportation to qualified residents of the Southlake Community; NOW, THEREFORE, KNOWN BY ALL THESE PRESENT: That City and CARS, in consideration of the mutual undertakings hereunder set forth, do hereby covenant and agree as follows: SECTION 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES A. CARS shall provide the following services: (1) Free on -call transportation for qualified persons of the City as follows: (a) Disabled adult individuals and senior citizens (over the age of 55 years) and, (b) Who are residents of Southlake, and (c) whose physical condition permits them to be transported by the drivers in the vehicles available, including an Activan with ramp for wheelchairs and motor chairs. (2) CARS will provide transportation to the persons identified in Section A. (1) above: (a) to and from non -emergency medical appointments, dental appointments, and health care providers located within a 25 mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activity Center; SECTION 2 GOVERNANCE A. CARS shall be solely governed by its board of directors, who shall meet in accordance with the bylaws. The time, date; place and agenda of these board meetings shall be the responsibility of CARS. SECTION 3 PAYMENT FOR SERVICES In recognition that the City elected to support the CARS transportation program rather than provide such service as a City owned community transportation service, and that CARS has successfully completed two years of operations, having commenced transporting qualified users in January 2000 as promised, City agrees to a 3rd year stipend to be paid to CARS in the amount of $15,000, payable in quarterly payments in the amount of $3,750. Payment by the City shall be applied towards the costs of the following: • Supplies. and printing costs associated with promotion of CARS service to Southlake residents. • Telephone and other utilities associated with dispatching volunteer drivers. • Rent of office space from which to coordinate operations of CARS. • Maintenance and operations expenses, and insurance costs necessary for operating the ramp equipped Activan. • Personnel expenses. • Other operational costs. SECTION 4 REPORTING A. CARS shall generate and provide to the City monthly reports which shall include ridership information showing the number of riders and the types of trips. CARS shall also provide, as requested, expenditure records related to operating expenses, i.e., rent, telephone, utilities, printing and supplies, insurance and personnel expenses. City liaison shall have access to CARS operational records and all budget reports, during CARS normal business hours. B. CARS shall provide the City information, if requested, necessary for the City to conduct an performance evaluation including, but not limited to the following: (1) Ridership audits; a) On -time analysis; b) user surveys. SECTION 5 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION A. CARS shall provide City proof of automobile liability insurance coverage with minimum limits of $250,000/$500,000, with City as an additional named insured B. CARS AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER HIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF CARS, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. CARS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES OR LIABILITY FOUND BY A COURT TO HAVE ARISEN FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY APPLICABLE INSURANCE COVERAGES. SECTION 6 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR In performing the services hereunder, CARS is acting as an independent contractor, and City shall have no power to direct or supervise its activities in carrying out its responsibilities under this Agreement. SECTION 7 TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from October 1, 2001 through September 30, 2002. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, either party may terminate this Agreement upon 45 days written notice to the other. Upon termination, or if CARS ceases to provide transportation services, CARS shall return to the City any unexpended funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. This Agreement sets forth all the agreements between the parties and no modification shall be effective unless reduced to writing and signed by the party to be changed therewith. This document may be executed in duplicate originals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and CARS have executed this Agreement as of this day of , 2001. CALL A RIDE OF SOUTHLAKE Steve Lakin,Chairman ATTEST: Notary Public in and for the State of Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary Type/Printed Name of Notary Public Commission Expires: Call - A - Ride of SOuthlakte, Inc. Anneal Budgm 0t4ber 2001 - SGP"Mber 2W2 ftm budget Maur payroll $10,400.00 Payron Uablim" $M.00 Telephone lraurance - airMor lrisuranoe - Volunteer1 5f Insuranov - Van supplies $2,000.00 Fundraising S2,000.0o PoWa0e $500.00 Prof. Fee/A=ounft U00.D0 DUSSMUbsco tions $75,00 Printing $500.00 Van Malrnenance $2.000.00 VolurAftr R000gnition $1.000,00 Egtjipmerrt $500,00 MW—Mmeegency $2,400.00 TOTAL $31,676.00 1TJ U0 01 l64k'.DD JLFLL H P[111G JUU: PIL.Ml'-. "�7•- YJ� W r'�� 49$ i �rQa c C4 %* O w M W tom. ell 0 Cq el ,y r-I M ti Dvo Lti ['S 1a Q Q O SQ p to Q w .. Im gn " ca N U C C; cv t-- t'n o O q cl% rn binI"I a v R7 >° AA x (�+ CARS Monthly Summary of Driver Service SWembdr 2001 Lo.Emsst - -- iFtrst NumAtr of TFipa Driver Wiles Driver Hours ban Af!!es Percent of Total lati1NLA 1 411 3.42% La 6.3ft ----0..0�00% Percent of Total Percent of Total 134% 1.70% 0.00% 6-Voon 1O 3.1 �0.00% Percent of Total BarUln ® �7&7s% 7-S r�1t7% I h Percent ar Total O.rrx as2% o.ao% Percent of Total 2-30% 1.52% 0.00% F^ © ® �a Percem or Total 10.07% 1e.41% araeOperp I--� � r—� L Percent of Total 2.00% r.a1% 0.00% ►�i� alb 1 et � 7 47 Percent 0f Total 9.10% �--7.30%� Percent of Total 3.00% 4.3ft IKaIlr Mery —� � �j 11. Perreit of Total 13.03% f 1.34% Q00% Percent of Total 8.20% Percent of Total 2.34% 1.40% 0.00% snnrYrn L3 Percent of Total 1.0296 3.3dli 11.72% Slew © ® ©� �-�—� l Percent or Total Percent of Total 2.02% 6,s0% 22.27% E Percent of Total 1AeA% 7.03% 0.00% Thurrdar. Oclubrr ! 1, 2001 Page 1 of 2 ;Last-- _ Irsr Number of Trips driverArd DriverXoyrs Yon 711es Ivan so San dolor t Perot of Total f.00�f s.o3it fa.z�9� wolW idaah � � 71 hmcat of Toted t0.fA!i t22% T.819f Pemeeat of Total oocrK Pemmt of Total Q8196 p,qp% brand Total !31 FI-I 9 9A,33 Sl CARS Sammaq of User Use by Home Chy September 200.1 00 User gel riser ID Number of Trips Gra pavine Ebabalh 62 0 TOW TAps for this City 0 Pam=! of All Trips Sarahlake AW=Wer Jem 1 '2 Ckw affirb" 79 4 Darr AMM 71 is CA"M OL*% 14 4 MW . MMY a 6 LAW ciarbw 18 11 Mmilown Ann 19 19 McEhwwy M"(WM) as 24 Schmow Ew"im . 4t 12 WWORW Wift 42 4 Trildan Jenny 64 2 V" Luis fa 5 vMw Fran 34 a Wood Mu" 32 11 Total Trips for this City 122 Pmea of All TrIps as. f 3% Gmd TaW 14FNbff of 9p4" 131 17w.v4py, th*eAwr It, Joel A . - i i 1 O ra d Von F� s r ® N J L_ ❑ 4 r: 0 KM m 4D. 3 It fir 1 m A Ig 61 a A I w 0 0 71 1- L-1 ---I 0 Ej 0 N --I 10 F-1 Is CARS Cancelled Trips by User - September 2001 Last Mmow RAW Name NIM ?Abw st owe Mahmn Arm BghrAMW eRmbdb Gohmbw 8&'Fd= 4 WON Eylko 2 "' dL,Y-* , 0" User Cancelled CARS Tri ,ps by User,Veptember 2001 Law.?VaAw Firs ivumbff Of OffeTky TMOS C** bra Oarr Annsue 2 HQQW Mary I LW,d CIWNM 2 Moftw Am I EOMANIN rclbzboih 2 VAM LIAW 2 Wood Thuradry. October H.. 2001 Pft- I Im k9 I t:! 81 44 ❑cr•I 15 ❑ L I� vc E7 ❑ d. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SENIOR ADVISORY COMMISSION September 11, 2001 - Senior Activity Center MEMBERS AND ALTERNATES PRESENT: Jeane Alexander, David Baltimore, Cleta Pierce, Marge Kyle, Bill Kyle, and Bill Cosgrove. MEMBERS AND ALTERNATES ABSENT: Jerry Montague, Connie Montague, Linda Moore, Tom Furey and Diana Collins. EX OFFICIO MEMBERS AND GUESTS PRESENT: Mary King, Executive Director, MMOW Linda Braun, MMOW Coordinator-Southlake STAFF PRESENT: Erin Riggall, Community Services Assistant Agenda Item No. 1, Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 1:15 p.m. Agenda Item No. 2 Election of Officers Confirmation It was moved to seconded to elect the following officers for the year 2001-2002: Chair - Jeane Alexander, Vice Chair - David Baltimore, and Secretary - Connie Montague. They were approved unanimously. Agenda Item No. 3 Approval of the 8/14/01 Minutes: It was moved and seconded to accept the minutes and they were approved unanimously. Agenda Item No. 4 Metroport Meals on Wheels Mary introduced Linda Braun, the new Coordinator for MMOW for Southlake. The August monthly statistical report was distributed. David requested a copy of the last year's budget versus the actual expenditures. Agenda Item No. 5 Administrative Comments Following discussion of the MMOW program for the Southlake Senior Activity Center, it was moved and seconded to recommend the Scope of Services Agreement for the continuation of the Tuesday program for the FY 2001-2002 at the $10,000 level of support. It was approved unanimously. Likewise, following discussion of the CARS program for Southlake, it was moved and seconded to recommend the Scope of Services Agreement for the continuation of this program for the FY 2001-2002 at the $151000 level of support. It was approved unanimously. Information on the Memorial Fund was distributed and discussion followed as to who should be responsible for dissemination of funds. The Commission agreed that a Memorial Committee should be established and that the Senior Center Participants should vote on how the money should be spent. Mary King offered that a commemorative plaque could be placed in the Center Agenda Item No. 6 Southlake Senior Activities No report as Tom was absent. Agenda Item No. 7 Open Forum Bill Kyle gave a report on the Freezer. Parts have been ordered and it will be fixed next week. If it cannot be located at the Senior Center, Mary King offered that they had room for it at their site and food could be placed there. The Cell Phone project is underway. Bill Kyle will be meeting with Mike Bedrich to discuss the dissemination of phones and the training program. A discussion followed regarding the leftovers on Tuesday. Commission members felt more food than necessary had been ordered in the past and was taken out of the Center. Both Mary and Linda are committed to monitoring the food and this issue in particular. It is difficult to gauge even an approximate number of participants right now and hopefully as we move into fall, the numbers will become more consistent for the Tuesday program. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at. Jeane Alexander, Chair Attest: SENIOR ADVISORY COMMISSION September 11, 2001 Dear Members of the Southlake City Council. As members of the Senior Advisory Commission, we are charged with the responsibility of advising our City Council regarding programs and services provided for the senior population of Southlake. Call A Ride of Southlake (CARS) has indicated their desire to continue to provide a senior and disabled transportation service to the residents of Southlake. The Senior Advisory Commission has voted unanimously to recommend the Scope of Services Agreement for continuation of the program for FY 200 1 -2002 at the $15,000 level of support. Sincerely, jee Alexan er, Chair Senior Advisory Commission SENIOR ADVISORY COMMISSION September 11, 2001 Dear Members of the Southlake City Council: As members of the Senior Advisory Commission, we are charged with the responsibility of advising our City Council regarding programs and services provided for the senior population of Southlake. Call A Ride of Southlake (CARS) has indicated their desire to continue to provide a senior and disabled transportation service to the residents of Southlake. The Senior Advisory Commission has voted unanimously to recommend the Scope of Services Agreement for continuation of the program for FY 2001-2002 at the $15,000 level of support. Sincerely, );ea&n-�eA—lexandcr, Chair Senior Advisory Commission N July 9, 2001 Southlake Senior Advisory Commission The purpose of this letter is to request the assistance of the Senior Advisory Commission to support the request of Call A Ride of Southlake for funding support by the City of southlake. At the June meeting of the Southlake Seniors Steering Committee official action was taken to make this request for the following reasons. Many of the Seniors living in Southlake can no longer drive or are limited in the distance they are willing to drive. They still need amsportation to medical appointments, balks, and for shopping and social activities. They thus become dependent on family and friends for transportation since there are no public bus services available in the area, or they are forced to withdraw from community and social activities and may not be able to obtain needed medical services. There is very limited taxi service in the area but the Seniors we have talked with have limited financial resources and say that taxis are beyond their means. Call A Ride of Southlake has been instrumental in providing essential transportation for our Seniors and improving their quality of life. About five percent of the Seniors attending the Tuesday luncheon program at the Southlake Senior Activities Center are transported by CARS. This allows them to associate with people their own age in conversation, games, craft projects, programs and lunch. These people are very appreciative of this opporhmity to fellowship with their friends and feel that they still have purpose ih life. Some of our Seniors develop medical conditions which require rehabilitation treatments at a medical facility. CARS has been able to provide the needed transportation when a family member was not able to do it or when a van equipped to carry wheel chair bound person was needed. The organization has also provided transportation to medical specialists as faraway as Dallas and Fort Worth. A number of our Seniors like to visit their hairdresser weekly and often combine the weekly food shopping and banking on the same trip. CARS availability has made this possible and the Senior's planning has allowed these several activities to be done in the same trip. We believe that Call A Ride of Southlake is providing a free -of -charge and essential transportation service to the Seniors and Handicapped people of Southlake. The organization allows them to obtain essential services and provides a very significant improvement in the quality of life for diem. All of CARS drivers are volunteers, and financial support is through donations from individuals, businesses, service organizations and the City of Southlake. Southtake Seniors urge the Southlake Senior Advisory Commission to support the request of Call A ride of Southlake for funding by the City of Southlake. Sincerely, Fran Weiser, Secretary Southlake Seniors V Ir 71,7 f , � �,,.• y�,� •vim � f � �`� :'- 113 rvYJ /rJ �j.+ ,X altA-1 Yll i r I m , cer, % u 1 eu. •• : ,� AL Ji t.,r# �..+-f-•... `��.L.:.{•.- ��,,�.^•'�� a ��- f � L� .�....�,�„� a.l,.X-- T w L i L • L, - r � � . � t• S � jam~ 'tirl•�'' V•�4l-4 � cl1 ^ , .t2�,i,x1L tL I o{, L• t� �� . C� Lt TT V rl.(i �)vt� � �• l J A ..4N`r�y.1�_�_��+.M..NrC-�.'Yr� ��`��1.,jrth�•'.p'-:d:K+�'°�`�-.~�r�.�^R•„��Y„�►� ��^ •_ .��.� City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM October 31, 2001 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (x1527) SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Community Services with Metroport Meals on Wheels (MMOW) Action Requested: City Council consideration for renewal of the agreement for community services between Metroport Meals on Wheels (MMOW) and the City of Southlake. Background Information: The Tuesday congregate meal program is currently part of the weekly program activities at the Senior Activity Center. Seniors currently pay $2.50 for the meal, which is provided by MMOW through various food vendors. City funding helps cover MMOW staff, supplies, and administrative costs for the Tuesday program and supplements the home delivered meals. This agreement is essentially unchanged from the previous with the exception of: (1) increasing the cost of the senior center luncheon meal from $2.50 to $3.00, and (2) language added to clarify the cost of home delivered meals in Section 3, paragraph 4. MMOW has requested funding for FY 2001-2002 of $10,000, which remains the same as for FY 2000-2001. Mary King, Executive Director of MMOW, has approved the agreement language for FY 01-02. Financial Considerations: MMOW requests funding of $10,000 for the Tuesday congregate meal program and the home delivered meal program. The approved FY 2001-2002 Community Services division budget has allocated $57,150 for community services. This request is within the budgeted amount. Billy Campbell, City Manager October 31, 2001 Page 2 Citizen Input/ Board Review: The minutes of the September 11, 2001 Senior Advisory Commission reflects unanimous recommendation for renewal of the Agreement for Community Service agreement. Legal Review: This agreement was modeled after the standard community services agreement utilized by the City. Alternatives: • Changes in funding amount as determined by City Council • Non -renewal of community services agreement Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: • Proposed Agreement for Community Services with Metroport Meals on Wheels • MMOW written request for funding • Minutes of the Southlake Senior Advisory Commission meeting on September 11, 2001 • Letter from Senior Advisory Commission in support of program • Support letters from Southlake Senior Activity Center participants Staff Recommendation: City Council consideration of the proposed Community Services Agreement between MMOW and City of Southlake. KH AGREEMENT FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE OF TEXAS § E COUNTY OF TARRANT § THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Southlake, Texas a home rule municipal corporation located in Tarrant County and Denton County, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized City Manager (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Metroport Meals on Wheels (hereinafter referred to as "MMOW), a nonprofit organization operating in the Metroport area as an organization described in section 501 (c) 3 of the Internal Revenue Code, acting by and through its duly authorized Executive Director (hereinafter referred to as "Coordinator"). WHEREAS, the purpose of MMOW is to deliver hot meals to homes of the elderly in Southlake, Grapevine, Colleyville, Keller, Argyle, Trophy Club, Westlake, Justin, Haslet, Roanoke, Marshall Creek, Bedford and North Richland Hills and to manage senior programs and activities as needed to citizens of these Metroport communities; and WHEREAS, City and MMOW desire to enter into an Agreement whereby MMOW will provide meals and social services to the seniors of the Southlake community and others as referred by City; NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That City and MMOW do hereby covenant and agree as follows: SECTION 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of Service shall include: MMOW 1. To coordinate, organize and run the weekly (Tuesday) Southlake senior congregates luncheon program and associated Tuesday activities. 2. To organize volunteers to plan and support Southlake's Tuesday congregate lunch program and home delivered meal program to Southlake residents. 3. Order necessary meals, cover costs and organize delivery of meals to homes of Southlake senior residents Monday through Saturday, and also for the Tuesday congregate lunch program and associated activities. 4. Track attendance and costs associated with the weekly congregate lunch program and the home delivered meal program. Prepare and provide reports to the City on a monthly basis, due the 2°d Tuesday of each month. 5. Perform general clean up following each event, return tables to original locations and secure the facility. 6. Provide a monthly updated roster of participants to include name, address, phone number and emergency information. City 1. Provide the facility each Tuesday from 9:00 am to 2:00 p.m. 2. Provide staff liaison to provide guidance and direction to MMOW and monitor activities. SECTION 2 MMOW'S OPERATIONS 1. The City shall have the right to review the books and records kept incident to the services provided by MMOW to the City. SECTION 3 PAYMENT FOR SERVICES City agrees to pay to MMOW the sum of $10,000 per year, payable in quarterly payments of $2,500, to help cover the cost of the following: 1. A Senior Congregate Luncheon Coordinator provided through MMOW to perform services described in Section 1. 2. Supplies provided by MMOW such as paper plates, cups, napkins, paper towels, table cloths and craft supplies for the fourth Tuesday craft activity held prior to the congregate luncheon. 3. Subsidize the cost of food for those persons unable to pay for their meals. This includes meals served at the weekly congregate lunch and for home delivered meals for the elderly of Southlake. 4. Individuals who can afford to pay for the senior center luncheon meal will be charged a maximum of $3.00 per person beginning January 2002. MMOW has the option to waive the luncheon fee if an individual brings a covered dish for the luncheon. Individuals who can afford to pay for the home delivered meal will be charged only the actual cost of the meal not to exceed $3.00 per person. Any increase in this fee shall be approved by the City of Southlake Senior Advisory Commission and the City of Southlake. SECTION 4 TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year beginning October 1, 2001 and ending September 30, 2002. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, either party may terminate this Agreement upon 45 days written notice to the other. Upon termination, MMOW shall return to the City any unexpended funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. The parties may modify this agreement by written amendment executed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and MMOW have executed this agreement as of this day of October 2001. Approved as to legal form and adequacy: Attorney at Law Mayor, City of Southlake Executive Director, MMOW 1011 Zf 3001 22: 00 FAX 8174216967 SES IOR_CENTER Q102 tray 03 01 LO;OZp Metraport Meals On Wheels t8171491-0661 Zkfi p,2 MFTROpow 'I MEALS +O N WHFELS s+�.a' "Celebrraliug 30 Yell ff Of Carnes [' May 3, 2001 V.te u", eta rrrr.... arn.r ,: Mi. KCLIII ligglndn Ili �N.JrfrVlTlf. J r.rrr n/s.,�l fuo-.wrlhCin city of souffilae ^"— a.ti....... , Dinxtor of Conmtunky Service'$ 400 N, White CIOPei kioWevt>trd !x .. � Irr....l Malt Se+ut c. Texas T6t?�l2 r � ,R .. 4.L. • . }•. � ear Mr. j•.[ UMj. 14?r., RO,Ya .. �• 0a behalf of the 'B""d Of 7' im �} p Ty I ulR C1Lt��. ��+Itilil�C� IIraa• 4i:.rr1•f ;iK.,. :, .: I r•,:i T "`�W �� p�'lIC]QerltS, j would like to r'tPr S5 r}ppreCiation tQ the City of Southfakc fvr Ihr :r n r, �^� •:.ra the op}�nftunity a has afforded Metro rt M }m eels 4rt �` Wheels hTT1 +L O sJ ur.r to ..11 �S^SS[{.wn:anl� provide support WTVioes for SOUINAke's •9e6ors. It bay bcch m� honor ,., r:-:•, for our orD Y �ranitat"n t4 vide weekly Co tr ale htncheo ns and ! •,: ^ - . r Jkr trJ.u/ ulm.•rrs activities for healthy scitisrs at the Southiale senior C`antct as w�e1 es l,l rl wrrk,rrr �:.:.r• : ,. home -delivered meals for thaw seniors w}tose need$ include \r clkida} M1!N•.. Saturday thmtt Y filvition and pusorml visits, «.•.w lu.r••rrlr ..' .. i.... J ask C0minued Southlal�e'rK arutrrshi p Pin 1ht5c cndtaVors through a ....., I ...._ .. 1 ' illlw..•r• •.,r..... ,,..., , •1. •r :•I.; y..l. grant of SIU.0010 to help defray the costs of these senrilex for the fiscal year begam ing October 1, 2001. TIM funding received from Southlal;t •..' - would be restruted io the direct cast of providing these serv�cs to your •.,,yr: •1.�. �.', •.r,r: 4,.a•.. citizens. MMOW would coot' provide the far The i continue to buttiittg rxlil'ecl casts of both programs as well as any direct costs in CXCM OF the fu di4 Provided by the grant. .I.r �,,." • i ant attaching budget Agr res rites reflect the acrtW cost ofiktc first . •.: IIr..,.:.flr,,. six rrwntim of this fi$I al year. Using the actt,el costs to derive an avcruge Cost pes person. a p oiccted budg:t for rha raominder of fecal 2 00 1 has .:;;.., lk-en prepared for the Senior Center Luncheon and Activiry ,':• ' program. Attemdancc fV=% rofltct rhr. increased pmrticom ion in February and 'herb. 11 iR aati ' ted that these bid ct � g iigums for the Senior Center _•ati:�rarJ,.� r;.,• Lumhean and Actntity pru gram will remain re 4tlively constant fbr fiscal =DO l -02. 4•r ...lea When 18slumd my responsibilities with MMOW, one ofmy first .."r; aetiuml was to meet with then Senior Center Director piona Whitehead to discuss the Setuot Center Luncheon and Aetivity program, our discmions included city l:oncems cad MMOW Noah. As a result of our tlteet"s, t1m Wowing occurred: C flan '04 • Ali I► u•IK, yuNc 1 Itlplmll�•,1 ?+rih; Ilfn,n.� wnr.!•Ivtltillnrn�p,wr1- lEt:l,tl.11iI F.15IA115yh;UbM1t I 5 r: e.;il ,uw�.�_'In�Ir m �,rn•:wa�l! 1 22,00 FAX 6174216967 SENIOR_CENTER �J05 ,I0:02P rtetrLOPort Meal$ On Wheels 08171491-0661 p, • MMOW budget reporting procedure was rcviscd to show 0,1dy the 00M 41CTirrCd in suPp"M& the Somthlake prapram wo tq wither clerdy Expense campries; MMOW PC-sitionl IRIC was Changed ti&M "Ditgstar" to 'U00rdiDRtDi ' to eiitrmlate aeonfusian between the Center Dirmai and [hn' MMOW LuecJ cons CaordinatcT WA tow nalnetass weer ordered; r F 4cW estimates to restaurants ,#j= rcduccl to curl, issues a f kftevers and PMVerrr WwFe; Lerlover luncheon foods were made avxilabk to dw Senior Center Director for the Thursday luttebeon if needed; • MMOW established a budget of S3.00 per »sal to oxhide entree, vegetable, fruh, salad sod desert expetac, with emphwsis plutxd On nutritional vz1vo of the snaai; not included in the 53M per meat budget arc lea, coffee, lernoraade, condinwrits, mar, steam, lemon WKi paper supplies; • In )anuaM April, July tad t}ctnber, {SOW wiU PUMNM And leave these Comm ality supplies at the ccmtr; I large box dishwashcr powder, I large bottle dtshwashi lS U4"id, I case paper wwelc, anx9 1 indbsrtml size roll foil; A surveil was designed. with input from too Sen k, Center Dirwtar, to =gas par kipant sMi&&ctkM; • The surny was maiiarl h'Y MMOW to eL persons in [h,e SoutWa]:a Senior Corner ddrahese; and • Results of tot survey (md address correction notices) wetr Compiled and provided to the Senior Center Director in Devcmbcr. Since the &rat of the year. nr(elndance at did A+LV0 W luncheon lees bicrea wl. The. inereas{cd attttxlance coupled with uneklurted food shortage4 foam ante afaur Iodg-time resmurantartsulted in 13LIft icptable food shortagce on tint first Tuculay in Petmlary. Ewen ,bough'.MMr) W raised this 4MC with ,the restl[utaat ®rid removed assku-&nces that the err* r would not be repfticdd it happened Again un the Ast Tuesday in Mamb. AS 0 resent, this scstautuA is no longer bcing used fort Ser> or Center Tlmcbw w- Alternative trstaurertt [TsOurCas hove been identified aW uacd_ Food counts to the n!51.11lrfln19 have been mrw-wd to reflect the mcrseMd atUn dunce. NMGW and Senior Center Director 76autrte Leek developed pro,erdures to handle any Ieaovcr imucs Ihat might a rlw from the increuml count In an Atrempi to eornpennte pwl3cnpaors for the irrcartverr once of the food 9hwtages. MMOW aftemd rcftutds to airy parlicipant who artmied tither of the luncheons (no pnt rrelrrested s ivftuxi) oral ahm provided a "free" lunch on March 2711, (note decrease W revenue for that n vrah). 21 r12:2001 22,00 FAX 9174216267 SEVIOR_CEhTER Q 04 03 oil 14=0:)p ttetroport Meals On wheels totI)491-0661 p,4 'Ilse home delivered program is much utore difficult to predict R-eeipiMs of hom"elirere,d mea me nwd,caW jCm_e� , We ftcque ntly ser t'hartgrs at the need for Wrv%rs due to 110SpitgtixMiorn and rehabissues. These change$ earn be shun farm. term 4r long Two of Our ScrutMIth talre part Cipanta are currently in Veltxb. In today's health care clinmt,c, other them. is Jess dui a 24 bour notice that a pativir will be rcleased to have and grad kwlediote support from MMow. Day to day cttncrllatiaaa often 00cur t►ecsuse of doetoes visits, the have tosr one Southlake participun to tiealh this yea. We also never know when wr will be cullod upon to 'VW new WICI oats to the lhcrnc-daliwmd prograrn, Qur iDfWr=turc, therefore, must be welt eatabliahod and ready to acoomrnodate individual otdds at a mvraent'8 notice. Thane flgrues nrp:eWttt dimet costs of providing the$ foot}, but do not M-fia-t the time and expense orrecxviri , Irnin4, retaining. managing and corrnrmrticiating with the hoone delivery volurneers. MMOW provides thiK service Mardless of the racipientC ability to pay, lfa FRnicipm pays fiat "kaki theCPAM never cxmds the dime cost of ttv food. MMOWc goals are to provide corwegt►te luncheons that develop MactMraderie and support systern,s for active seniors. to plan fun, intcrsctive Wivitles for seniors thot sec responsive to then intefests, to 0WOU Mge increased pwicipaiiun and to involve volumeraa in significant ralc5- Ow goals tier the iroma•delivorW program i$ to CotttimW using, the delivery of meals aS the wnduit to establishing per n0j aonne+ctiorts with Mors who are not abbe to got out end soriali-e. btu uygw zAtxnl's C111tuTe has always been "tic ghbers helping neigltiors.- We nrive to sttudWc programs that have a solid commtmity basis. The ability to partner wirtt eitim, v+Yth rostaturaoLs within the con%Mazrilty and with Octi'vc wnrmumhy vehmte€rs enhances the quality of lifc CUT ell whom we serve. PIesse lee nw know if can answor an7 guestior,3 or provide additional atformatiML We WPpleCWd working with you and your staff artd look forward to being a Contributing end resomefal primer. It is our bope that our joint efforts'pwvide hwh service to our so niors and a dw artik role traadel of the bermlits that cvltabutptiW ol%rts rap brhM to It conmlurnity, srnonsly, Mary King Executive Dirmtor CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SENIOR ADVISORY COMMISSION September 11, 2001- Senior Activity Center MEMBERS AND ALTERNATES PRESENT: Jeane Alexander, David Baltimore, Cleta Pierce, Marge Kyle, Bill Kyle, and Bill Cosgrove. MEMBERS AND ALTERNATES ABSENT: Jerry Montague, Connie Montague, Linda Moore, Tom Furey and Diana Collins. EX OFFICIO MEMBERS AND GUESTS PRESENT: Mary King, Executive Director, MMOW Linda Braun, MMOW Coordinator-Southlake STAFF PRESENT: Erin Riggall, Community Services Assistant Agenda Item No. 1, Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 1:15 p.m. Agenda Item No. 2 Election of Officers Confirmation It was moved to seconded to elect the following officers for the year 2001-2002: Chair - Jeane Alexander, Vice Chair - David Baltimore, and Secretary - Connie Montague. They were approved unanimously. Agenda Item No. 3 Approval of the 8/14/01 Minutes: It was moved and seconded to accept the minutes and they were approved unanimously. Agenda Item No. 4 Metroport Meals on Wheels Mary introduced Linda Braun, the new Coordinator for MMOW for Southlake. The August monthly statistical report was distributed. David requested a copy of the last year's budget versus the actual expenditures. Agenda Item No. 5 Administrative Comments Following discussion of the MMOW program for the Southlake Senior Activity Center, it was moved and seconded to recommend the Scope of Services Agreement for the continuation of the Tuesday program for the FY 2001-2002 at the $10,000 level of support. It was approved unanimously. Likewise, following discussion of the CARS program for Southlake, it was moved and seconded to recommend the Scope of Services Agreement for the continuation of this program for the FY 2001-2002 at the $15,000 level of support. It was approved unanimously. Information on the Memorial Fund was distributed and discussion followed as to who should be responsible for dissemination of funds. The Commission agreed that a Memorial Committee should be established and that the Senior Center Participants should vote on how the money should be spent. Mary King offered that a commemorative plaque could be placed in the Center Agenda Item No. 6 Southlake Senior Activities No report as Tom was absent. Agenda Item No. 7 Open Forum Bill Kyle gave a report on the Freezer. Parts have been ordered and it will be fixed next week. If it cannot be located at the Senior Center, Mary King offered that they had room for it at their site and food could be placed there. The Cell Phone project is underway. Bill Kyle will be meeting with Mike Bedrich to discuss the dissemination of phones and the training program. A discussion followed regarding the leftovers on Tuesday. Commission members felt more food than necessary had been ordered in the past and was taken out of the Center. Both Mary and Linda are committed to monitoring the food and this issue in particular. It is difficult to gauge even an approximate number of participants right now and hopefully as we move into fall, the numbers will become more consistent for the Tuesday program. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at. Jeane Alexander, Chair Attest: A SENIOR ADVISORY COMMSSION September 11, 2001 Dear Members of the Southlake City Council: As members of the Senior Advisory Commission, we are charged with the responsibility of advising our City Council regarding programs and services provided for the senior population of Southlake. Metroport Meals on Wheels (MMOW) has indicated their desire to continue io provide a Tuesday Meal .Program at the Southlake Senior Activity Center. The Senior Advisory Commission has voted unanimously to recommend the Scope of Services Agreement for continuation of this program for FY 2001- 2002 at the $10,000 level of support. Sincerely, 4ea`ftt-ie Alexander, Chair Senior Advisory Commission KM Southlake July 23, 2001 To: Members of the Southlake Senior Advisory Commission From: Southiske Seniors Steering Committee The members of the Southlake .Seniors Steering Committee unanimously voted to request the City Budget Committee to include funding of the Tuesday Metroport Meals on Wheels program in the 2001-2002 budget. This Senior Luncheon program at the Southlake Senior Activities Center is highly successful and attracts large numbers of Seniors every Tuesday. It is well-orgairized under the able leadership of Sonja Allen and Seniors enjoy a hot nutritious meal and enjoy a variety of activities with their friends. Many enjoy the weekly domino and bridge games and the monthly Bingo get-togethers. Newcomers to the area are made welcome, and birthdays and other events are celebrated with other Seniors. Seniors keep in touch through the monthly newsletters and special announcements of friends who are ill or have lost loved ones. 'Tuesdays at the Center are a happy tradition, wellknown in this community, thanks to the efforts of MMDW in cooNratian with Center Director Joanne Leek and many volunteers. We believe that this }grogram is well worth its cost to the City, and should be continued. We urge the Senior Advisory Council to request fiuiding for the'1'uesday Mcugxyrt Meals on Wheels program from the 13udget Committee and Southlake City Council. Southlake Seniors Steering Committee Fran Weiser, Secretary co i owl _ I e e e 15 I/ C r y v C, 4, Gee t_ G c, cp + f V 41 40 71 tit i ,'I LA i jWX r 1 1 To .1 South lake benior iid-v1z3ory ny Knaoynu anu 1 inve atterden the Qenior uent,T av the AxeL umber mania at wheals since the vory ::tart of W Wo met first in tke sraj. IoV cain, located in A u o n t e n i a 1 1 or , t h c cs up t I-r ew i-x-o, w-� ,ao V 0 d over to Ve Parho anA aeore&tion muRnint. There was Knays goou loot, ncou nampany, Unnos, tun, 70011 in OLPqQla, -hal 1 % -C 7D the new Senior uonter ana the group grew, The Weanesday proGram wan in goaa hands ana Wanership Ln7er lose era now Surja. Sonja always triou to prDV=e deliciave meala for zbe Suriors anC z am sure it in inpossible to purchasu th000 from rea=rarLs !or the -rice or 2.Do woMws whica oeninr pay. on the Tirst Monnay A Ach month is Dingo way, wijnh jo enjoyea by averyone, nozil eilts have to he puruhaved. ohs third tUrsday of to konth 1S CUUTY USY FMd •PatPUB18 00 a=d= jum Woer worns Mod to brie in aduirional Tundu making Mexinan ouol= btations, tile =xc Acyclirg also brfnan in u0me tunas. It WOLlU . U rM to reCAVC SOM KAMM. r;onuy j.or t1is yy Y• h'R e c 4 q- , PRELIMINARY PLAT - Z " Il • K T' HARI SHYAM yk, DESCRIPTION F 1 Q. 1 R TRA. _, M O 0 6 ACRE CT 4F LAND,- : ; ..• . . M:z ._,,. �- a�� n 1 1 r Be 0.06aces of l �Survey,_.. ,. ESTATES 9 o land located n the J.L. ; Ch+viers Abstract No. 384, ''SK Tarrant Count Texas, m r land y, a as, be the tact of a d described �n Vole 3766, 568, r.Tarrant,• e . Deed Records of n Cou t ,Said 10.016 acres of land begin more � t1RACT 2D1 10.016 ACRES BLOTS) gd 4 bd fjr ft par ice ar y escra as o ows. - ; WMM IN 9 .. THE POINT OF BEGINNING bean a 1 /2" iron pin found at the Southwest corner of said 10.016 acre tract on the Northern r� ht--of--wo line of East Dove Road. Said H V R RV y J. L C I E S SURVEY M� corner being5.00 feet N f centerline 2 e t North o the centerline of said road. From the POINTet . Yr t ABSTRACT NO. 384 of BEGINNING, a 1/2" iron pin for reference bears N 00 02 ,14 E at 16.67 feet S T : �? found for Southeast corner of Lot 14, Block A•--R of a subdivision known as 'VOL 37669 PG. 568 gr Huntwick Estates. Said Subdivision. recorded as a Reptat of Huntwick Estates, `•` n ' ,�� .t.� ,.,��`� described in Vol. 388-182, Pg. 75 of the Property Records of Tarrant County x D. R.T. C.T. Texas. RD. IN THENCE N 00'02 14 E along a wood fence, passing said Huntwick Estates THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE g g Southeastern corner atop this 'course at 16.67 feet. � Continuing an said course 'AR, ��//� .along the Easternmost boundary line of said Huntwick Estates, a total distance of t, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 1399.75 feet along said fence to a pipe found for Northwest corner of herein described tract. Said corner common with Northeast corner of ' Lot 10 of said ks Huntwick Estates. Said pipe being in the South boundary line of tot 17, Block BPRIU ROW .r of _ a subdivision known as Quail Creek Estates. Said Subdivision recorded as 1 PREPARED. OCTOBER 2001 _ QuoiE ` Es�a#e�. 8e�:nbed •, in Vol 386 a 8. Pg. 92 of the Property Reoov<,4a of �.- , :: , '`•j 4x Tarrant County Texas.� - n fi r VICI MY MAP . THENCE N 89'23'51 " E along a wood fence and following the South boundary KLA OWNERIDEVELOPER: line of said Quail Creek Estates a distance of 311.37 feet to a pipe found for >Y Northeast corner of herein described tract. Said pipe being in the South, JAY SABHA T A boundary line of Lot 12, Block B of said Quail Creek Estates. Said pipe also _ .: �- � 251 � E. SHADY GROVE ROAD � 1 5 being the Northwest corner of a tract of land deeded to the Carroll Independent School District recorded in Vol. 4781, Pg. 950, Deed Records of IRVING, TEXAS 75060 Tarrant County, Texas. PHONE: (972) 579-021 1 THENCE S 00'02'19" W along a wood fence and following the Westernmost FAX: t9721554-Ofl66 boundary line of said School tract, a distance of 1403.02 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found " for Southeast corner of herein described tract on the Northern right—of-way line of East Dove Road. Said corner common with the Southwest corner of said School ENGINEER: tract. Said corner being 25.00 feet North of the centerline of said road. 1 ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. THENCE due West along p fence following the Northern* right—of-way line of said —.4 .4:-4&— -- —4F z� to s�_a a . ♦.. ALIIAIT fl[ ornutKnsn _ _a_r_ __ a_a_t QUAN`TITA11VE LAND USE SCHEDULE GMFM W14M PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN OF THE SHYAM - HARI ESTATES CIiaAG? 2131, 10.016 ACRES, 8 LOTS) Larw,NI wnK J. L CHNERS SURVEY ABSTRACT N0. 384 VOL 3766, PG. 568 D.R.T. C.T. N THE cmr of sounHLaKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED: OCTOBER 2001 OWNER/DEVELOPER: JAY SABHAYA 2512 E. SHADY GROVE ROAD, # 15 IRVING, TEXAS 75060 PHONE: (972) 579-0211 FAX: (972) 554-0066 LEGEND TREE LINE FH¢ FIRE HYDRANT (PROPOSED) SsmH ® SAN. SEW. MANHOLE (PROPOSED) SSMH ® SAN. SEW. MANHOLE (EXISTING) Q BORING F no r .rW g. wr I I vrww. 11 w. w1V ! V 1 1 Cp�p f _ r/� RFr.TIT'iE F 1 1. 9 ,n. � 4 OVERALL DRAINAGE MAP SCALE 1'=200' )EVELOPED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL ACREAGE (acre) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF TIME OF CONCENTitATION (min) ► 10 (cfs) 0(10 (cfs� 1(100) (cfs) 0 100) ds) 1 2.819 0.50 1.5 6.62 9.33 9.57 13.49 2 5.063 0.50 1.5 6.62 16.76 9.57 24.23 3 0.563 0.50 15 6.62 1.86 9.57 2.69 4 2.003 0.50 15 6.62 6.63 9.57 9.58 5 0.126 0.50 15 6.62 0.42 9.57 0.60 A-1511 A-1049 Y C) 0 CU m m m m 0 0 CD- Cn Cr Cu 0 x w z N z N 0 0 0 co 0 w Cn 0 Cu 0 Cn 3 HILL ADDITION VOLUME 388-159 , PAGE 96 P.R. T. C. T. BLOCK 1 LOT 2 LOT 1 LOT 3 EXISTING ZONING "SF--1A " E. HIGHLAND STREET POINT OF — %., EX 5' UT/L ESM'T� EX 5' UT/L ESM'T --� EX 7.5' UT/L ESM'T� 1) EX 7.5' UT/L ESM'T 2 ( 1 4— Ex 7. 5' UT/L ESM'T� I( �e WILL/AM C. MASSE- Y � VOLUME 7774 , PAGE 1159 D. R. T. C. T. S89ro0'00"E 178.84' LIANA ADDITION VOL UME 388-202 , PA GE 71 P.R. T. C. T. EXIS77NG ZONING 191 POINT OF BEGINNING TRACT ,2 S89'00'00"E 250.01' A-1511 A-1049 (0 U0 3 04 M 0 �i h �I0 Q 0 i Q A-1688 A-525 CRIPPLE CREEK TRAIL Ii i I I 15 16 18 17� �19 BLOCK 4 ——�_ —o — �--— PARA LINDA ESTA TL', .1 SECTION II VOL UME 388— 749 , PA GE 71 P. R. T. C. T. I 13 \ , 12 I 11 I 10 14 \ EX 5' UT/L ESM'T 1 L UT/L ESM'T ! 35 ! 'T j EX 5 UT/L ESM �j 34 EX 10' UT/L ESW'T I C7/ y 0), G)?A CITY OF SOUTNAICE SHADY LANE EXIS77 ,G ZONING R7..5" MESA VERDE TRAIL 33 32 31 BLOCK 1 I I I ! I 1 EX 10' UT/L ESM'T 1 � 1 2 3 1 1 5 EX/S77N IN ZONINGS SF'0 A p �\� 2� �' W I BLOCK 1 I 5 6 1 I E GREEN ASINET A , SLIDE- 52r-5 P. R. T. C. T —�EX 10'UT/L ESM'----- YEARGAIN COURT T�',S' 7 50 0 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 "=50' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOCATION MAP BEING a 5.582 acre tract of land situated in the T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.1049 and being all that certain tract of land described in deed to Schon M. McManus as recorded in Volume 10448, Page 20, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 5.582 acre tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the south right—of—way line of East Highland Street (a variable width right—of—way), said point bears NO2'02'55"E a distance of 16.21 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3583, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S89'00'00"E, along the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 428.85 feet to a point for corner at the intersection of the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street and the west right—of—way line of North Kimball Avenue (a variable width right—of—way); THENCE S00'32'17"W, along the west right—of—way line of said North Kimball Avenue, a distance of 556.19 feet to a point for corner; THENCE N8919'06"W, leaving the west right—of—way line of said North Kimball Avenue and along the north line of Lot 1, Hanna Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-202, Page 71, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, a distance of 443.57 feet to a point for corner, said point being the southeast corner of said Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition; THENCE NO2'02'55"E, leaving the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition and along the east line of said Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition, a distance of 558.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 243,139 square feet or 5.582 acres of land. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (TRACT ONE) BEING a 2.315 acre tract of land situated in the T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0.1049 and being all that certain tract of land described in deed to Schon M. McManus as recorded in Volume 10448, Page 20, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 2.315 acre tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the south right—of—way line of East Highland Street (a variable width right—of—way), said point bears NO2'02'55"E a distance of 16.21 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3583, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S89'00'00"E, along the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 178.84 feet to a point for corner; THENCE S01'40'11"W, leaving the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 557.66 feet to a point for comer in the north line of Lot 1, Hanna Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plot recorded in Volume 388-202, Page 71, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N89'19'06"W, along the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition, a distance of 182.55 feet to a point for corner, said point being the southeast corner of said Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition; THENCE NO2'02'55"E, leaving the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition and along the east line of said Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition, a distance of 558.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 100,848 square feet or 2.315 acres of land. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (TRACT TWO) BEING a 3.267 acre tract of land situated in the T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.1049 and being all that certain tract of land described in deed to Schon M. McManus as recorded in Volume 10448, Page 20, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 3.267 acre tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the south right—of—way line of East Highland Street (a variable width right—of—way), said point bears NO2'02'55"E a distance of 16.21 feet and S89'00'00"E, a distance of 178.84 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plot recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 3583, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S89'00'00"E, along the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 250.01 feet to a point for corner at the intersection of the south right—of—way line of said East Highland Street and the west right—of—way line of North Kimball Avenue (a variable width right—of—way); THENCE S00'32'17"W, along the west right—of—way line of said North Kimball Avenue, a distance of 556.19 feet to a point for corner; THENCE N8919'06"W, leaving the west right—of—way line of said North Kimball Avenue and along the north line of Lot 1, Hanna Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-202, Page 71, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, a distance of 261.02 feet to a point for corner; THENCE N01'40'11"E, leaving the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition, a distance of 557.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 142,291 square feet or 3.267 acres of land. ZONING EXHIBIT KIMBALL PARK ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING SITUATED IN THE T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1049 JU LY 2001 APPLICANT: FOUR PEAKS DEVELOPMENT 726 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 109 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 329-6996 OWNER: SCHON M. McMANUS 2149 E. HIGHLAND STREET SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 5.582 ACRES ENGINEER: WELCH ENGINEERING, INC. 4109 CAGLE DRIVE, SUITE D NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS (817) 284-1175 76180 ZA 01-093 U i012 1 Y 0 0 fU Cu cU CU v 0 0 F- 3 0 z U J Cn / Z U / 0 0 0 00 0 Cn w 0 CU O En 3 HILL ADDITION I WILL/AM C. IVASSEY VOL UME .388— /59 , PA GE 96 I �� , • VOLUME 7774 , PAGE 1159 P.R. T. C. T• �� g D.R. T. C. T. BLOCK 1 OWNER.- e LOT 3 FAITH FERGUSON o a -1 �� EXIS77NG ZONING EXISTING ZONING rl „ SF 1A � a fv-vB� 2 LOT 1 EXISTING L. U.D �D 0e. EXISTING L. U.D "MIXED USE" LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL N FH N � M ----6'GV --—____—_---s"W— -- -- E. HIG LAND STREET X 00 00 C" N M -- — a F 178.84' 153.95' F�" •25 00' 10' UTIL ESM T I I E XIST GRAVEL DRIVE I40 DBCUILDING-5 °.,';PROPOSED'' . RE HYDRANT s'sTocKADE N CNI NCIt J W � Z z o Q I I" w I W LL HOUSE i z / I I— I UTIL ESM'T 1 a) 5' o 0i 'I 45, 993 SOFT. N I v, a i I0 SEPTIC TANK 10' UTIL ESM'T PROPOSED ZONING SF 1 A BLOCK 2 I 40' BUILDING SETBACK FRAME BU/LDING W I15' DRAINAGE AND O L — UTILITY ESM'T 'fl N88'19'49"W C Z 155.90' - - � 15' DRAINAGE ESM'T /% 40' BUILDING SETBACK I P'' ' I EXISTING ZONING "A 'N I PP i I G >Pj I I QI I Q �� 2 � I /, N U) EX 5' UTIL ESM'T -j I 51, 955 SO. FT. z I I z J FRAME BUILDING m I / D ' POINT OF BEGINNING ----6"W-------- --6 ASPHAL T PA VEMENT 11 !- S89'00'00" E 250.01' 4 J 1 10' UTIL ESM'T ---� 10' UTIL ESM'T - -10' SANITARY SEWER I AND 10' TYPE "A" EASEMENT AND 10' TYPE "C" I BUFFER YARD BUFFER YARD I "UILDI SETBACK MIN. 1500 S.F. j W 27, b43 SO. FT. o I MIN. 1500 S.F. i W 20' BUIL ING SETBACK 171 I 5' TYPE "A" BUFFER YARD -- 89'46'18 / %: i / ' 2894- 5' TYPE "A" I 20' PRIVATE --"'-- BUFFER YARD ACCESS ESM'T 10' TYPE I-- F-1" 20' BUIL ING SETBACK " I BUFFER YARD MIN. 1500 S.F. 2 PROPOSED J4,139 SQ.FT. FIRE HYDRANT i BL CK 1 MIN. 1500 S.F. I 1 20' BUILC ING SETBACK 1 BUFFER YARD - 16.20' j-""'44 of U z O I N 04 U �; ,,,,,,-, 231.13"./' / / / / / //I 5' TYPE OPRIVATE BUFFER YARD I ACCESSESM'T Y 20 BUI DING SETBACK M in m PROPOSED ZONING Q N i� » MIN. 1500 S.F. 1-- v z MF-1 3 z 1W- MIN. 1500 S.F. 024 407 SO FT. m 1 `r 20' BUILDING SETBACK N BU FYER YARD \\I 1 5' TYPE "A" i 20' PRIVATE--`-- - - - BUFFER YARD ACCESS ESM'T i 20' BU LDING SETBACK EX/STl jC ZONING �',� �•►" MIN. 1500 S.F. I I 4 10' SANITARY SEWER �684 SO. FT. MIN. 1500 S.F. EASEMENT I 1 20_�LDING SETBACK 0' TYPE "F-1" 1 5' TYPE "A" UFFER YARD BUFFER YARD�P ---r- A II m o I I F! 5' TYPE "A"� -- - 20' PRIVATE --- N BUFFER YARD ACCESS ESM'T • j 20' BUI ING SETBACK II a 15' DRAINAGE ESM'T- m �, 10' UTIL ESM'T- I I 1 �" I 5 AND 10' TYPE "C" �/ W vk 5' UTIL ESM'T Mi I z 124,736 SOFT. IN. 1500 S.F. I I i BUFFER YARD 0 I 40' BUILDING SETBACK o I o W I LI MIN. 1500 S.F. CD 20' DRAINAGE AND I I 6'STOCKADE o UTIU'TY ESM'T ---. I I FENCE + �— 20' (LDING SETBACK 5' UTIL ESM'T I 1 I 5' TYPE ---j L — —-182.55'- BUFFER YARD i 239.02'i -------------------N89'19'06"W 261.02'-�-- — EX 7.5' UTIL ESM'T -/ 6'STOCKADE I I I I FENCE OWNER. I EX 7.5' UTIL L-SM'T HA NA ADDITION 1 i HAZEL ✓ANE-T HANNA MILLER VOLUME 388-202 , PAGE 71 P.R. T C. T. 1 I EXISTING ZONING I "AG" I I EX/ST/NG L. U. D "MIXED USE I Q �z S W v WV A-15 1 A-104T o I Q I Q �O 94' R( 23.1 25't PVM'T Iw I� IW I� 1 N N N I J a U z o U � J I I N 00 M 15 16 17 II I 1 it I II I IV I I N; I BLOCK 4 - 00 jo� II I D je I EX 5' UTIL ESM'T I 14 SS �• 12 I � I I _ , I qo� I I I I I I1 iII I i I 1 y 45.71 I MESA VERDE TRAIL 1 1 I I --- j I EX 5' UTIL ESM'T I I II I �v� IN1 ~i I 35 i 1 I EX 5' UTIL ESM'T EX/S//N ZONING � I I I I "R 5" I i I �1 33 I I I ,/� 4 X8' DROPjT� J4 I I BLOCK 1 I I I EX 10' UTIL ESM'T NNl ��---� a ------- --- A-1 CITY OF GRAPEWNE — C/TY OF SOUTf1rLAKE I SHADY LANE L L --- --- --- 72_f?CP----------------------------------- --72'!?CP _ g�—,n -81w— — — — — _ — — FH----8'w--- I WV _ I N PROPOSED FIRE E HY IRIAiT Y J 3 U z 0 U 47' 22' L 42' Ell 25't 'VM'T s'ss SSMH I I I EX 10' UTIL ESM'TI I , OWNER' ( 2 NVE // L TD I EX/ST/NG L. U.D '; WEDWA f DENS/TY RESIDENTIAL " I I 1 EXISTING ZONING -Nil to, 5F2�-A �� A 13 O I � BLOCK 1 ' 5 I 6 OWNER.- ( N VE // L TD I EVER GREEN ESTA TES CAB/NET A , SLIDE 5225 P .TC.T. 47' I I 5' 47' 2' "Y" INLET EX 10' UTIL ESM'T 47' I 1 SSMH ( I II O m 1� 11 W I I. 0 I I " WV — s "SS YEARGAIN COURT ,I II 11 �-- — — OWNER.• FH SPENCER JOHNSON, Q I iI I etux CELESTE EX 10' UTIL ESM'T �I N i i 13 I 12 40 0 40 80 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1 "=40' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOCATION MAP BEING a 3.267 acre tract of land situated in the T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.1049 and being all that certain tract of land described in deed to Schon M. McManus as recorded in Volume 10448, Page 20, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 3.267 acre tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the south right-of-way line of East Highland Street (a variable width right-of-way), said point bears NO2'02'55"E a distance of 16.21 feet and S89'00'00"E, a distance of 178.84 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3583, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; • 1 " THENCE S89 00 0 - 0 E, along the south right-of-way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 250.01 feet to a point for corner at the intersection of the south right-of-way line of said East Highland Street and the west right-of-way line of North Kimball Avenue (a variable width right-of-way); THENCE S00'32'17"W, along the west right-of-way line of said North Kimball Avenue, a distance of 556.19 feet to a point for corner, THENCE N89'19'06"W, leaving the west right-of-way line of said North Kimball Avenue and along the north line of Lot 1, Hanna Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-202, Page 71, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, a distance of 261.02 feet to a point for comer; THENCE N01'40'11"E, leaving the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition, a distance of 557.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 142,291 square feet or 3.267 acres of land. SITE DATA SUMMARY: EXIST ZONING IS "AG" PROPOSED ZONING IS "MF-1" PROPOSED LOTS - 5 EXISTING L.U.D - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL GROSS AREA - 142,291 SQ.FT./3.267 ACRES NET AREA - 125,709 SQ.FT./2.886 ACRES DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE - JANUARY 2002 DUPLEX UNITS - 10 BUFFERYARDS - 10' TYPE "A" ALONG STREET FRONTAGE 5' TYPE "A" ALONG SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 10' TYPE "F-1" ALONG BACK OF LOTS 5' TYPE "A" ALONG INTERIOR LOT LINES IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE - LOT 1, 5,528.0 SQ.FT., 19.9% LOT 2, 7,199.6 SQ.FT., 29.8% LOT 3, 6,936.2 SQ.FT., 28.4% LOT 4, 7,199.4 SQ.FT., 29.2% LOT 5, 5,655.8 SQ.FT., 22.9% SCREENING - SCREENING ALONG N. KIMBALL AND E. HIGHLAND WILL BE THAT WHICH IS REQUIRED BY THE BUFFERYARDS. CONCEPT PLAN FOR MF-1 ZONING REQUEST KIMBALL PARK ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING SITUATED IN THE T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1049 JULY 2001 3.267 ACRES APPLICANT: OWNER: ENGINEER: FOUR PEAKS DEVELOPMENT SCHON M. McMANUS WELCH ENGINEERING, INC. 726 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 109 2149 E. HIGHLAND STREET 4109 CAGLE DRIVE, SUITE D SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 (817) 329-6996 817 284-1175 7� 589-0990 FAX ZA 01-092 nrr'f1 ('--a 0` L v 0 1 Y Ci CD Cu CU O 0 0 4-3 O 3 7 m 0 0 0 CU CL crn 0 0 0 cti.i 0 D w m 0 D CV O co 3 A-1511 A-1049 ee oo HILL ADDITION � r,�af6)�,'� I/OL i MF_ 388— 959 , PAGE 96 � a � �P� � pj P.R. T. . T. BLOCK 1 0,� WILLIAM C. MASSE- Y � " . U.D. VOL UME 7774 PAGE 1 159 LOW DENS/TY RES/DEN17AL � D.R. T. C. T. LOT 2 LOT 1 LOT 3 D. =M/XED USE" EXISTING ZONING "L. U. "SF— lA " EXISTING ZONING "B1" z S LO CRIPPLE CREEK TRAIL 75 i 76 I , -to\A,a" 18 I 19 —BLOCK 4 �PARA LINDA ESTATES, SECTION II I/OLUA9E 388-149 , PAGE 71 � 13 P R. T. C. T. 12 I » I 10 14 to to _- 16.2Q EX 5' UTIL ESM"T 3" 406 60 20' POINT OF iUTIL 3.95'227.15�23.17' 4' RO �-,t -� BEGINIMIG �1 M'T = `.,'j 0 SANITA Y SEWER 10' UTIL ESM T 48. ' 45.7' —' / �EASEMENT — — — /:y3;' �� / 25'f UTIL ESM'T 10 UTI ESM T '�-ir'..: p,0� I � 40 'OV) PVM'T 40 BUILDING $ETBACIC> = o'�w 'BUILDING SETBACK r25 f EXIJc..c ,>.:�X'+;!;N::;��CrwM.•,•• (�(/I N N ��14JSO. 35 ��EX 5' UTIL ESM'T / 37.12' I ;� N '46 18 W .- I cn I 228.94' �_ I 34 --- /i o '!: %j?!�F% N / 1 20' PRI�✓ATE 36.87' 1 N co / ACCESS ESM'T I cl- / ( /� I N EX 10 UTIL ESM'T I WELL HOUSE '% _ I 1 I I A-1688 �� 41 al y OFPIE WM' — De .d , I -200 N CTY OF SOUTHLAKE )124, IJ9 SQ.Ff5 UTIL SM T 45ol — o / ( I I 20' PRIVATE Q 0 SEPTI ANK 10' UTI� ESM'T I / I I� / Z/ r CCESS ESM'T % g (� /� ,/ /-J�� / I �B!189-46'18-WZ CCK 1 / 36.50'/i5 Or bD / % �.= o1w o^ BLOCK 2 �' �/ � I Q W W) PTO B�REM0kP9 1/ I ,1- f 36,150' I og� FRAME BUILDING �I I -PR OP OSED ZONING 15' DRAINAGE AND, -� I :r I TOWER �� _ �� / / I_ >: Z (� .n UTILITY ESM'T / N o� I M F 1 �, l p 01 I/ o I 3/ z I o o A N88'19'4 W �I �/ 4407 SO. FT /� 100 of n W X Q Z 155.90' I I / 0° 1 I �- / / 1 E�F/NG ZONING a _ I 1 15' DRAINAGE ESM'T 1 'A G" / / 36.50' � I W I r- N 89 4618 W 1 w / r- I /I I oO�BING SETB CK / I /I / 233.77' , �36.- U O'UILDI `� ( I Uj 20' P ATE ESS ESM'T / / ( iv I PROPOSE ZONING EX 5' UTIL ESM'/�III '/ II TTT1II ' o / 4 ``oa ,r16 vio 24,684 SO. FT LO EX NST/NZONING I 1o' SANITARY SEWER1 EASE cd AG" / I ' I TO BE REMOWO I / r 36.52 N89'46'4$'fW o � --fRAME BU"Zi I 36.41' 2 / Iy / I I / 20' PRPV'ATE -� 51,955 SO. FT. / I /� AC SS ESM'T 10' UTIL ESM Tj ( DRAIN i 5' UTIL ESM'T / 4/0 124, 7 6 SO. F�7.'I ( I o 25't 590 PVM'T 20' DRAINAGE AND -- 94' I ROW UTILITY ESM'T 25.00' EX 5' UTIL ESM"T UTIL 6M'T / / 47 47' ---—� — 182.55 -- �/ / 239.02' 22' — EX 7. 5' UTIL ESM'T� �/ — /44.3.57- — — — — / El 7.5' UTIL ESM'T III �— HANA ADI�ITIOIV 2 EX 7.5' UTIL ESM'T � I EX 7.5' UTIL ESM'T VOL UMEE 388-202 , PAGE 77 I I Q I Q P. R. T. C. T. I I 1 I � II ICI I lol "L. U.D. =M/XED USE" I I I EX/ST/NG ZONING II-------------AG-------1-- ---------------- N E. HIGHLAND STREET N a N Cq — — — EXIST ASPHAL T PA VE NT IT --I GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE 1/2" IRON RODS WITH CAP SET, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. BEARING SYSTEM BASED ON THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 3583, P.R.T.C.T. 3. BUILDING SETBACK LINES TO BE ESTABLISHED PER REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ZONING ORDINANCE. 4. PROPOSED ZONING FOR LOTS 1 THRU 5, BLOCK 1 WILL BE "MF-1" AND THE PROPOSED ZONING FOR LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2 WILL BE "SF-1A" 5. SEE ATTACHED "SURVEY PLAT" SUPPLIED BY VEACH LAND SURVEYING CO. FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS. A-1511 0o N a�� A-1604-9 LAND USE SUMMARY SINGLE FAMILY: 97,948 SQ.FT. DUPLEX: 125,709 SQ.FT. EX/S77 "G ZONING I IR7.5" MESA VERDE TRAIL 8 i 32 i 31 BLOCK 1 _ SHADY LANE _ — — --I — — — — — — -- — — — I I EX 10' UTIL E-SM'T I I I 1 2 3 I I 1 EXIST/ G L. U. D. WED/UM DEN TY RESIDENTIAL EX/ST/N ZONING "SF 0—A" e I BLOCK 1 5 I 6 I 7 ( EV GRA EN ES YES ASINET A , SLIDE 52 5 P.R. T. C. T. — -7z-EX 10' UTIL ESM'T — — — — — — — — — — YEARG I I EX 10' UTIL ESM'T 13 I 12 I I EX 20' DRAIN AND L — UTIL ESM'T— — — -t — — — — 50 0 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 "=50' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ST PROJECT �— LOCA n01V iSS 7S7 z O7D- a J O J QW U m 2 Z U O U � E SOUTHLAKE BLVD (FM 1709) % PAK KNOLL DR LOCATION MAP BEING a 5.582 acre tract of land situated in the T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.1049 and being all that certain tract of land described in deed to Schon M. McManus as recorded in Volume 10448, Page 20, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 5.582 acre tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the south right-of-way line of East Highland Street (a variable width right-of-way), said point bears NO2'02'55"E a distance of 16.21 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3583, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S89'00'00"E, along the south right-of-way line of said East Highland Street, a distance of 428.85 feet to a point for corner at the intersection of the south right-of-way line of said East Highland Street and the west right-of-way line of North Kimball Avenue (a variable width right-of-way); THENCE S00'32'17"W, along the west right-of-way line of said North Kimball Avenue, a distance of 556.19 feet to a point for corner; THENCE N89'19'06"W, leaving the west right-of-way line of said North Kimball Avenue and along the north line of Lot 1, Hanna Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-202, Page 71, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, a distance of 443.57 feet to a point for corner, said point being the southeast corner of said Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition; THENCE NO2'02'55"E, leaving the north line of said Lot 1, Hanna Addition and along the east line of said Lot 1, T. Mahan No. 1049 Addition, a distance of 558.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 243,139 square feet or 5.582 acres of land. DR QUANTITATIVE LAND USE SCHEDULE PHASE EXISTING EXISTING PROPOSED NUMBER GROSS DENSITY —DU OPEN SPACE LAND USE ZONING ZONING OF UNITS ACREAGE /GROSS AREA AREA/% 1 MEDIUM "AG" "MF-1" 10 3.267 3.28 NOT LESS DENSITY THAN 60% RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM "AG" "SF-1A" 2 2.315 1.16 NOT LESS DENSITY THAN 80% RESIDENTIAL A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1-2, BLOCK 2 KIMBALL PARK ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING SITUATED IN THE T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1049 JULY 2001 7 LOTS 5.582 ACRES APPLICANT: OWNER: � FOUR PEAKS DEVELOPMENT SCHON M. McMANUS OF T 726 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 109 2149 E. HIGHLAND STREET •. • • •• t SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 *�� (817) 329-6996 %' TI��lioil Y j6W......99A ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: '••,'�ec;t •'��'��'� •� WELCH ENGINEERING, INC. McCULLAH SURVEYINGS INC. 0— o Q� 4109 CAGLE DRIVE, SUITE D 16531 ADDISON ROAD %�AL�`� = NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 ADDISON, TEXAS 75001 (817) 284-1175 (972) 713-9777 ZA 01-094 li l✓ f :L L. U U 1 HILL ADDITION VOL UME 388-159 , PA GE 96 T. ,� �� • a � � W/LLIAM C. MASSEY P. R. T.C. >� � �� VOLUME 7774 , PA GE 1159 BLOCK 1 D.R. T. C. T. 2 LOT 1 yj l� LOT 3 r a ej� )e CONNECT TO EXISTING 6m WATER WITH 6" TAPPING SLEEVE FH AND VALVE ---6'{y--- -------6'W------- E. HIGHLAND STREET \EXIST ASPHALT PAVEMENT — wv ZZ OPEN CUT —z 7i I 9'00'0_0"E 428.85' _-- - 1 — — — / PROPOSED / — ROPOSED 6". _ SANITARY SEWER I 1/ �EXISTW' L EAT—L MANHOLE OPO 10' uRESM'T A�l — tANIT Y SEVER j PROPOSED 3/4" WATER " OLE / A -SERVICE:.:::t. _•.. .. I v , EX/ST( OPOS :SIRE HYDRANT i PROPOSED 3/4 WATER (� I /r- \ SERVICE-----� I �W WITING 6 WATERCONNE6CTTATO EXISL PEEV6TH PING SLWELL HOUSE / I AND V VE I I I � ►-� / "PROPOSED 3/4WATER SERVICE PR /O/SEDI i /0 2/ E HYDR�NO 10U4 ET II � PROPOSED 3/4" WATER' 5UTIL SM� � / � I I / �y I / / SERVICE _� Z OD to l< / ^-- / 10I SANITARY SEWER J- / I / t0 FRAME�UILDING I ( EASEMENT 0 0 NN I �j_ BLOCK1 M_EAN PROPOSED n O UTILITY ESM'T + t SANITARY SEWER N /MANHOLE // I � ./ I J I I I I -,-PROPOSED 3/4" WATER ( SERVICE PROPO D S Y 'UamT—IL -ESM'T SANARSE 6°°WEVi — / I I / ,T 15 DRAIN�E ESM � I Z LI I 1 CONNECT,40 EXISTING 12i WADE II BLOCK ?f / /I I / I WITH l"x6" TAPPING SL VE AW VALVE I I / 'UTIL ESM'T / / I I / I / / / I / 2 4 / PROPOSED /I I / I / FIRE HYDRANT, EX 5' UTIL ESM'T %�i FRAME BUILDING / I / I �5 / hgh I I PROPOSED PROP SED 8" SA ARY SEWER ANITARY SEWER. � 4--- — _ _ — — 5' UTIL ES T I MANHOLE / / 20' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY ESM'T 443.57'— — — — I / I EX 7.5' UT/L ESM'T I PROPOSED I I SANITARY SEWER I MANHOLE 7. �-- EX 5' UTIL ESM'T HANG ADDITION II VOLUME- 388-202 , PAGE 71 P.R. T. C. T. j PROPOSED 8" I I I I SANITARY SEWER i I I I I I I i 4!— -------------------------- --------------------- I CONNECT TO PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER THE PLANS BY CHEATHAM. AND ASSOCIATES, INC. r�l II I i II II 1 I II I I I I I I II II I I II I I i I I I 1 I II I I II I I I i II I I I I I i I I I i I 1 II I, I I II II I I II II .I I � I i II II II II I I I I II I I i I I I IVI ICI I I II II II II II II II II I I II I I I I II i i I \� BLOCK 4 EX 5' UnC ESM'T \ Y 14 12 ��' VON 0� —j�--- MESA VERDE TRAIL EX 5' U77L ESM'T i 35 EX 5' UTIL ESM'T 4 X8 DROP /NL EX 10' UT/L ESM'T BLOCK 1 I INI V� --7Z ---- _ C/TY OF GRAPE—WNE— — — - CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SHADY LANE II I I L-----------------�� -------------------------------------------------------- 72 RCP —8'w—FH ------ -�} wv 6'SS OPEN CUT SSMH I I I II EX 10' UTIL ESM'T I i , I I 2 I �OPEN I IT I I I I i "Y" INLET ,o 1)� -oepi'�o BLOCK 1 �'VE'RGRE�N ESTATE'S CAB/NET A , SLIDE 5225 P. R. T. C. T. �— EX 10' UTIL ESM'T YEARGAIN COURT k----8,•w--------______--a"w------- 40 0 40 80 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 "= 40' Z n Z E HIGHLAND ST CRIPPLE CREEK TF CASEY C PROJECT LOCH 77ON Q J Q co Z �sy �iFsT Y J Z >- a BLVD KNOLL DR LOCATION MAP PRELIMINARY WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FOR LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1-2, BLOCK 2 KIMBALL PARK ADDITION i► AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ,T •••.�s� AND BEING SITUATED IN THE T. MAHA go I N SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1049 17 *.. ��►�"� 1� •Q. JU LY 2001 APPLICANT: FOUR PEAKS DEVELOPMENT 726 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 109 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 329-6996 7 LOTS OWNER: SCHON M. McMANUS 2149 E. HIGHLAND STREET SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 5.582 ACRES ENGINEER: WELCH ENGINEERING, INC. 4109 CAGLE DRIVE, SUITE D NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS (817) 284-1175 (817) 589-0990 FAX 76180 ZA 01-094 �n [ ron Y 0 0 CU CD v Q 0 U 0 m 3 N 0 z U d Q O Z U 0 a 0 CV co / w cn In / N O / LOT 2 I LOT 1 HILL ADDITION �,� �� IDOL UME 3P8�8. � C9 , PAGE 96 �� a �� V OL UME 7WIMAM 774 , C. MP GASSEK E 1159 BLOCK 1 t �� f° D. R. TIC 11 LOT 3 '� ��'� OS- 2 -------6"W------------6'W-�-- STREET�_FZLS T A.S'PHAI T PA VFA.fFA/T %9'00'00"E 428.85' , / 1 E.11ST RA / !1L OR/ WE / I e;-::. /pROPOSp3r DITICH � 5-f r _ --ARO I / I / / I / / IMP�MENT� I 1 �i� �p I / I / I / ----- w W IWELL HOUSE 60500 � n / FRAME/LDING / w/ii / PROPOSED-tARTHE I / , / ' DRAINAcG`E SWALE/ BLOCK � 0 0 Q Lj' / - - - PROPOSED I BL1 �M^ Q o -� %- --►� CULVERT I / / 3 / o600 , BLOCK ?f I i 1 / 4 / / / I I / 2 I i B/ EX 5' UTIL ESM'T FAME BUILDIN / ------ /5 I PROPOS EARTHEN DRAIN SWALE - - - I I/ / EX 5' UTIL ESM'T / - - - - / - N89'19'06"W 443.57'- EX 7.5' UTIL ESM"T / T , EX 7.5' UTIL ESM'T / III I I EX 7.5' UTIL ESM'T DDITION' 2 I -r HA NA A EX 7 5' UTIL ESM'T ( I VOL UME 388-202 , PA GE 71 I I III PRT.C.T l< i 16 15 I I 17 II ( ( I I IV I I I �I I II I 1 I ----------- II \ BLOCK 4 �jo I I I I i I II \ I I II I E II P f i I EX 5'UTIL ESM'T Sg 14 3 R• 12 ( I I I �E P I I 1 qo I I 1 1 II i L I I i I lI � II II II 11 _ _ = MESA VERDE TRAIL UT/L ESM'T I 1 1 I 1' 1 Ilcd INI I I � EX 5' UTIL ESM'T P . 4 X8' DROP /NL�� D� 34 � I I BLOCK 1 1- EX 10' UTIL ESM'T I �; C/TY OF GRAPEI/1NE C/TY OF SOUMLA!(E SHADY LANE L-_--------'---------------------------------------------------------_ Lw--------------- 72 RCP------------------___---------------------72';4CP --8"W------- _-----g"w FH WV Q----- _ -6'SS = SSMH � I I ( I I I EX 10' URL ESM'T I I OS-2 1 I "el D F BLOCK 1 5 1 6 i EV�'RGR�' N E',STA TES i CABINET A SLIDE 5225 P. R.I T. C. T. I -2� '"Y" INLET ESM'T �I --EX 10'UT/L ES SSMH---i------ 0 - 6'SS wV - - - - IFH11 I li Q II t III II " EX 10' UTIL ESM7 II � II I II n YEARGAIN COURT 40 0 40 80 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 "= 40' LOCATION MAP DRAINAGE AREA CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE N0.AREA AREA (Acres) C (ULT) I5 Q5 I * Qioo C (EXIST) Q5 (EXIST) Q100 (EXIST) A 4.03 0.75 6.6 19.9 11.6 35.1 0.30 8.0 14.0 B 1.10 0.75 6.6 5.4 11.6 10.0 0.30 2.2 3.8 OS-1 0.60 0.75 6.6 3.0 11.6 5.2 0.30 1.2 2.1 OS-2 0.96 0.75 6.6 4.8 11.6 8.4 0.30 1.9 3.3 * INLET TIME 10 MINUTES PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN FOR LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1-2, BLOCK 2 KIMBALL PARK ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING SITUATED IN THE T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1049 ( JU LY 2001 APPLICANT: FOUR PEAKS DEVELOPMENT 726 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 109 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 329-6996 1 "=2000' 1 7 LOTS 5.582 ACRES OWNER: ENGINEER: SCHON M. McMANUS WELCH ENGINEERING, INC. 2149 E. HIGHLAND STREET 4109 CAGLE DRIVE, SUITE D SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 (817) 284-1175 (817) 589-0990 FAX ZA 01-094 nrAln r,