Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2000-04-04 CC Packet
City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Billy Campbell, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 4, 2000 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Approval of minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held March 21, 2000. If you have any changes to the minutes, please discuss these at the work session or notify Sandy LeGrand prior to the meeting. She will bring the amended minutes to the meeting for your consideration 2. Agenda Item No. 5B. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract with Avanti Landscape Management for annual mowing services for public rights-of-way. As noted in the packet item cover memo, we were required to seek bids this year for state and City right of way mowing, since the previous contract allowed for only a single one-year renewal. Previously, the bids were awarded to two different contractors since the mowing was split into separate categories. We have combined the two into one contract, and will provide an option to the City for two one-year renewals. The low bid was received by Avanti Landscape Management of Arlington in the amount of $25,995.00. This bid is within the unencumbered amount budgeted for mowing services. Due to the wide disparity in bids, staff is checking with the high bidders to determine why they were so much higher than the two lowest bids. However, Avanti Landscape Management, the low bidder, has had the City right-of-way mowing contract for the past two years and we have been satisfied with their work. Questions on this item may be directed to Steve Polasek. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 2 of 18 3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Resolution No. 00-33, Authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining fee simple ownership of land for use by the City as a park, library or for other public purposes. This item is being brought forward in conjunction with a contract for property we are attempting to purchase for park land. The intent of this resolution is to take steps to condemn the property if necessary, although we are working on a negotiated agreement. The City Attorneys have drafted the resolution. After discussing this item in executive session at its March 27 meeting, SPDC voted (7-0) to recommend City Council pursue condemnation action if necessary. Please call Shana Yelverton or Steve Polasek if you have questions on this item. 4. Agenda Item No. 5D. Authorize the Mayor to enter into an interlocal agreement with TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool. Recently, TML (the City's dental insurance provider) formed the TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefit Pool (TML-IEBP) and transferred all asset of the TML-Group Benefits Risk Pool (GBRP) to the new trust TML-IEBP. This move was necessary because when the TML-GBRP was developed in 1979, the welfare trust was set to expire in 21 years, or on May 1, 2000. On January 28, 2000, the TML-GBRP Board of Trustees voted to transfer all assets and liabilities to the TML-IEBP on April 1, 2000, and to terminate the TML-GBRP Trust on the same date. For these reasons, TML is requesting all Councils and governing bodies to sign a new agreement with TML-IEBP since TML-GBRP will no longer exist after April 1, 2000. The change will be almost transparent for the employees, our benefits are not changing, and there are no costs associated with the change. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 3 of 18 5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Resolution No. 00-35, Appointing Curtis Powell and Dave Visney to the SPIN Standing Committee as co-representatives for SPIN Neighborhood #15. The SPIN Representative position in SPIN #15 became vacant when Wayne and June Haney resigned in January. The process for appointing the SPIN Standing Committee members allows for residents to select a SPIN representative, and the City Council then appoints the individual selected by a particular SPIN neighborhood. Residents of the SPIN #15 area were informed of the vacancy and a vacancy meeting was held on March 23 to select a new SPIN Representative. The only person attending the meeting was Mr. Powell, who indicated he and neighbor, Mr. Visney, would like to work together to represent SPIN 15. Both Mr. Powell and Mr. Visney attended the SPIN orientation in January because they had an interest in volunteering as the SPIN No. 15 representatives. The City Council has appointed co-representatives in the past. Contact Shelli Siemer if you have questions about this item. 6. Agenda Item No. 5F. Resolution No. 00-36, Abandonment of sanitary sewer easement in Eagle Bend Estates, Phase 2, Lots 19, 20, 21 and 23, Block 64. The final plat for Eagle Bend Estates, Phase 2 shows a relocation of a sanitary sewer easement across Lots 19, 20, 21 and 23, Block 64. The original easement was for a sewer line to serve Dominion Addition. The relocation of the sewer line was to take the sewer line out of the buildable area of the lots and re-route it. The relocated sewer line has now been constructed and is in use. The old abandoned line has been filled with concrete. The sanitary sewer easement for the abandoned line is no longer needed by the City. The staff recommends that the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 4 of 18 sanitary sewer easement be abandoned. If you have any questions, please contact Charlie Thomas. 7. Agenda Item No. 5G. Authorize the Mayor to execute a commercial developer agreement with CISD for improvements at Johnson Elementary School. CISD is adding four classrooms at Johnson Elementary School. With this addition, CISD is installing an 8-inch water line with new fire hydrants on site and installing a 12-inch water line in the right-of-way of North Carroll Avenue from Highland Street to CISD's north property line. This is our standard developer agreement to cover the installation of the public infrastructure. You will note that CISD is requesting waiver of a number of fees. This has been done on previous developer agreements with CISD. If you have any questions, please contact Charlie Thomas. 8. Agenda Item No. 7A. Ordinance No. 775, 2nd Reading, Abandonment and quitclaim of a portion of South Kimball Avenue right-of-way at the intersection of Crooked Lane. The design of South Kimball from Crooked Lane to the Heritage Business Park is ongoing. The right-of-way for this portion of South Kimball was dedicated by plat several years ago. During the design, it was discovered that the right-of-way for South Kimball south of the Crooked Lane intersection did not align with the existing right-of-way north of the intersection. The property owner south of Crooked Lane has recently dedicated the additional required right-of-way to align the intersection. In exchange, portion of right-of-way that will not be required can be abandoned and quitclaimed to the property owner. Staff recommends Council abandon and quitclaim a portion of the South Kimball Avenue right-of-way at the intersection of Crooked Lane. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended this item be approved (6-0) at its March 9, 2000, meeting. City Council approved the 15t reading of Ordinance No. 775 at its March 21, 2000, meeting. If you have any questions, please call Senior Civil Engineer Shawn Poe. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 5 of 18 9. Agenda Item No. 7B. Ordinance 480-335, 2nd Reading (ZA 99-099), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Crestwood Office. The purpose of this request is to combine abandoned right-of-way of Old North Carroll and an out parcel lot of the Southlake Town Square property located on the west side of the realigned North Carroll right- of-way, and to revise the previously approved Concept Plan. The current zoning on the property is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses (Lot 1R2 W.W. Hall Addition) and NR-PUD with "C-3" Commercial District Uses (Lot 1, Block 9 Southlake Town Square). The requested zoning is "S-P-2" with "0-1" uses to match the approved zoning of the original Crestwood Office development zoning. This request is associated with a land swap between Greenway Investments and Cooper Stebbins. Greenway Investments owns the property of the requested Preliminary Plat for Greenway-Carroll Addition, Item 8C, ZA99-101. The two parties have agreed to swap Lot 1, Block 9 and the abandoned Carroll right-of-way for the proposed Lot 2 Greenway-Carroll Addition. The existing concept plan was approved with a one-story 9,800-square-foot office building. This plan proposes an Alternate Plan 'A' and Plan `B'. Plan 'A' proposes a 10,400-square-foot office building and a 4,400-square-foot bank with four "drive- through" banking lanes. Plan `B' proposes two office buildings, one being 8,700 square feet and the other 9,000 square feet. Both plans show extension of the existing Carroll Avenue "Driveway A" to the new South Carroll Avenue and propose an additional right-in/right-out "Driveway B" accessing Southlake Boulevard approximately 291' from the intersection of Carroll Avenue. The applicant is requesting a variance to the required 500' spacing from the intersection of Carroll Avenue for the proposed "Driveway B," stating that it is needed to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 6 of 18 improve traffic flow on the site due to having only one full-access driveway. The "Driveway A" accessing Carroll Avenue is limited to right-in/right-out movements due to the median on Carroll Avenue. A variance to the required 5' Type 'A' bufferyard along the west lot line also is requested. Parking and a drive lane were approved in this location on the original concept plan and are being proposed in the same location by this plan. On March 9, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (3-2, with members Muller and Peeples opposed) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated March 3, 2000, amended as follows: 1) approving Alternate B; 2) waiving Items #1 (500' driveway spacing on Carroll Avenue); 3) waiving #2 (bufferyard along the common property line); 4) excluding banks with drive-through lanes and drive-through ATMs; 5) stating that a portion of the tract has "S-P-2" zoning and they are adding a tract with "NR-PUD" zoning to it and went with an "S-P-2" zoning in order to match the districts; stating that they want an "S-P-2" type of zoning in order to exclude drive-through banks and allow a right-in/right-out driveway; and 6) adding the condition of a deceleration lane and putting the money in escrow. The City Council approved (5-0) 1st reading of this item on March 21, 2000, subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated March 3, 2000; accepting Alternate Plan B, deleting "drive-through banks" as a permitted use, allowing driveway spacing along Carroll Avenue as proposed, allowing a right-in/right-out drive on F.M. 1709 as shown, requiring appropriate dedication for a deceleration lane once the shoulder is gone subject to City Engineer's recommendation, waiving Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 7 of 18 the 5' Type "A" bufferyard along west side, granting a variance for two parking spaces and requiring no parking forward of the 50' building line. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough regarding this item. 10. Agenda Item No. 7C. Ordinance No. 480-333, 2nd Reading (ZA 00-008), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3D, situated in the J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 5.03 acres. No concept plan is required to be processed with this request. A single lot "plat showing" has been submitted to the staff for approval in association with this zoning change request. There appear to be no unresolved issued related to this request. A change to "RE" Residential Estate was not requested because the tract does not meet the minimum 300' width required (tract is approximately 156' wide) and after dedication of right-of-way along Florence Road, the lot would be less than the required 5-acre minimum. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) on March 9, 2000. City Council approved (5-0) 15t reading of this item on March 21, 2000. Contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough regarding this item. 11.Agenda Item No. 7D. Ordinance No. 480-334, 2nd Reading (ZA 00-011), Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 2B, situated in the T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being approximately 5.358 acres. No concept plan is required to be processed with this request. A single lot "plat showing" has been submitted to staff for approval in association with this zoning change request. There appear to be no unresolved issues related to this request. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 8 of 18 The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) on March 9, 2000. City Council approved (5-0) Pt reading of this item on March 21, 2000. Contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough regarding this item. 12.Agenda Item No. 7E. Ordinance No. 480-326, 2nd Reading (ZA 99-138), Rezoning for Linnia Johnson's property. This request proposes a zoning change from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District. This City has received an amended request to propose "SF-1A" on the east 0.8 acres and "SF- 1B" on the west 1.2 acres. The purpose of the amended request is to allow Mrs. Johnson to retain a net 1-acre lot ("SF-1B" on the west) for her home site and sell the remaining portion ("SF-1A" on the east) to be included in the proposed Crown Ridge Estates development, currently zoned "SF-lA". The developer of Crown Ridge Estates is platting Mrs. Johnson's property and has included it in its preliminary plat. This plat is scheduled to be heard at the April 6, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. A reduction of this plat has been attached to my memo. Ms. Johnson resides on the property in an existing 1,500-square foot house. The house size complies with the minimum square footage requirements for the "SF-1B" district. It is my understanding that Ann Wittington of Maguire Partners is coordinating a service project to construct Ms. Johnson a new home on this site. Platting must occur prior to issuance of a building permit. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-1) on January 6, 2000, with Commissioner Peebles dissenting citing his reason as wanting to abolish the "SF-1B" zoning district. The City Council approved (7-0) on first Reading on January 18, 2000. On February 1, 2000, the City Council approved (7-0) tabling this item and continuing the Public Hearing to the March 7, 2000, meeting. On Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 9 of 18 March 7, 2000, the City Council approved (7-0) tabling this item at the applicant's request and continuing the Public Hearing to the April 4, 2000. Contact Karen Gandy regarding this request. 13.Agenda Item No. 7F. ZA 00-004, Site Plan for ISIS Papyrus. The site plan proposes one two-story and five one-story office buildings totaling approximately 40,000 square feet. This is proposed as a corporate campus and headquarters for an international software company. Two issues on the plan are the proposed canvas-type covered entry at the front of Building 'A' and a proposed 50' sculptural tower. The canvas entry covering is a "membrane" type roof and is not permitted under the Corridor Overlay Regulations. The applicant stated to the Commission that two of its overseas offices have similar coverings. The Commission recommended a variance and directed the applicant to provide photographs of the other offices to the City Council. It is anticipated that the applicant will have the photos at the meeting. The proposed sculpture was described to staff as a corporate logo, which that would have placed the sculpture under the regulations of the Sign Ordinance. At the Commission meeting the applicant stated its intent to hold a competition of artists, with the winning sculpture being placed on the site. If this is not to be a sign/corporate logo, the only issue is the height. The maximum permitted height is 35 feet. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) (Commissioner Muller dissented) on March 23, 2000, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 17, 2000, with the following amendments: • allowing articulation as submitted; Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 10 of 18 • allowing the membrane-type roofing on the entry covering requiring the applicant to bring pictures to City Council of facilities in Austria and Singapore to help justify the covered entrance and encouraging the applicant to relocate the covering behind the building and maybe do something else with the front of the building; • allowing bufferyards along the north and east to be offset along the edge of the existing common driveway; • allowing 85' driveway spacing between the south driveway on Bank Street and an offsite driveway to the south (minimum 100'driveway spacing); • allowing driveway stacking depth as proposed with elimination of the two west spaces on the south side of the southern-most entry drive on Bank Street, and one space on the north side of the southern-most entry on Bank Street, and one space on either side of the northern-most entry on Bank Street; • Acknowledging the applicant's willingness to have the City consider the tower as a sign and to have them bring it forward as a variance to the Sign Ordinance to seek City Council approval, adding that this site plan would not be permitted without that agreement; Contact Dennis Killough regarding this request. 14. Agenda Item No. 7G. Resolution No. 00-34 (ZA 00-010), Specific Use Permit for Rainbow Plant Sales for a nursery yard/outside display of plants for retail sale. This request is being brought forward under the requirements of the newly adopted Outside Storage Regulations and the corridor Overlay Regulations which permits nursery yards along the Corridor only with approval of a Specific Use Permit. The applicant proposes outside sales of bedding flowers and hanging baskets. Flowers are to be sold by the flat and displayed on the ground in clusters as shown in the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 11 of 18 photographs included in your packet. The applicant proposes use of approximately 3,200 square feet of area on the site. The proposed months of operation are the 3rd week of March through July 4 and the 3 week of September through the 15t week of December. There is no new construction proposed,just a temporary 10' x 10' shade structure. The applicant is requesting a 10% reduction in required parking, waiver of the all-weather surface for the display area, waiver of screening, and approval of the proposed shade structure. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) (Commissioner Muller dissented) on March 23, 2000, allowing the variances requested to parking, all-weather surface material and screening, and directed the applicant to provide pictures of the shade structure to the City Council. The Commission also recommended the following conditions: • Restricting the SUP to March 15 through July 15 and September 15 through December 7; • Restricting it to bedding plants and hanging baskets not to exceed 12 inches; • No stacking will be permitted of the bedding plants; • Dead grass to be replaced; • Not allowing the fence as shown, but requiring the applicant to bring a picture of the honesty fence to City Council for review; • Stipulating that the SUP will expire on March 30, 2002; and • Restricting the hours of operation to 7:30 a.m. to dark seven days per week. Contact Dennis Killough regarding this request. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 12 of 18 15. Agenda Item No. 7H. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for Rainbow Plant Sales located at 2170 East Southlake Boulevard. Rainbow Plant Sales has leased ground space from Dallas Foam at the site along East Southlake Boulevard. The sign ordinance allows a business sign either as an attached sign on a building or as a monument sign. Because Rainbow is leasing ground space and the business is not in the building, and a monument sign is too permanent for a temporary business, the applicant has requested to erect a ground-type sign. This would be the type of sign structure that is normally used for a real estate sign or for a development. The requested sign would be 2 feet high by 16 feet long and maximum of five feet above the ground. Contact Malcolm Jackson if you have questions. 16. Agenda Item No. 7I. ZA 00-030, Revised Site Plan for Lot 1, Block 10, Southlake Town Square. This is a minor revision to the previously approved site plan that proposes adding a 14' x 25' customer loading area in the southwest corner of Building 10C. This revision reduces the building floor area from approximately 8540 square feet to 8441 square feet and increases the articulation of the previously approved building. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) (Vice- Chairman Peebles dissented) on March 23, 2000, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated March 17, 2000. Contact Dennis Killough regarding this request. 17. Agenda Items No. 8A and 8B. Ordinance No. 776, abandoning a portion of right- of-way on TW King Road; and Ordinance No. 777, abandoning a portion of right- of-way on Kirkwood Boulevard. During the approval of the 380 agreement and Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 13 of 18 rezoning for the Sabre Corporate Campus, the abandonment of a portion of the right-of-way of Kirkwood Boulevard from S.H. 114 to TW King Road and the abandonment of a portion of right0-of-way of TW King Road from Kirkwood Boulevard to old TW King Road was included in the agreement. Sabre wants to proceed at this time with the completion of the necessary Council action to officially abandon these roadways, effective on December 1, 2001. Sabre plans to abide by the agreement that requires the streets to remain open to public traffic until Phase I occupancy, which is anticipated in the latter half of 2001. Design and approval of the secure access points will be processed through P&Z and City Council prior to physical closure of the roadways. If you have any questions, please contact Charlie Thomas or Greg Last. 18.Agenda Item No. 8C. Ordinance No. 480-332, 1st Reading (ZA 99-139), Rezoning and Site Plan for 114 Kimball Square. A request to table this item until June 6, 2000 has been received from the applicant. Contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough regarding this item. 19. Agenda Item No. 10A. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Scope of Services agreement with Call a Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS). The agreement being brought forward for your consideration has been revised based on CARS' requested changes. The revisions are highlighted in the contract, and summarized in the packet item cover memo. The City Attorney will be available for any questions you might have. 20.Agenda Item No. 10B. Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-A for the Roomstore Furniture Store located at 1600 East Southlake Boulevard. The Roomstore received two sign permits on September 4, 1998 under Sign Ordinance Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 14 of 18 506-A for the existing attached sign on the front of the building and for a monument sign. Prior to building the monument sign the owner appeared before City Council and requested to build a second attached sign on the East face of the building instead of the monument sign because it would be more visible. The variance was granted for the second building-mounted sign on January 5, 1999. After operating the business for approximately one year, manager Sidney Gardner has now asked to erect a monument sign at the originally approved location. The sign as now proposed would comply with the present ordinance in terms of size and construction. This case is brought before the City Council even though the sign fully complies with the present sign ordinance because of the stipulation on the original variance. Contact Malcolm Jackson if you have questions. 21. Agenda Item No. 10C. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a reciprocal parking agreement with EPIPD - Crossroads Square, L.P. (Tom Thumb). This item follows through on a requirement set forth in the motion to approve the rezoning on EPIPD's property (i.e., Tom Thumb site). The City Attorney's office drafted this agreement based on its understanding of the zoning approval on February 2, 1999. Briefly, the agreement would run until July 1, 2040, or until such time EPIPD abandons the parking use. Its rights cannot be assigned without prior written consent of the City. EPIPD would be permitted to construct off-site parking west of its site on Bicentennial Park property, and north of the Tom Thumb's store on city- owned property. The parking stalls would be constructed of grasscrete. In exchange, the City would be permitted to use all off-site parking spaces plus twenty-six (26) parking stalls located north of the western off-site spaces. In total, the City would gain the use of fifty-two (52) spaces for park-related uses, (specifically, ballfields #4, #5, and #10 which are utilized by the 10 and younger Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 15 of 18 age group). Refer to Karen Gandy's memorandum for a summary of the liability, responsibility and insurance issues. Although EPIPD has been provided a copy of the agreement, neither the city attorney's office nor staff have received any comments from the company as of late Friday afternoon. However, based on prior discussions, Staff anticipates that EPIPD may wish some relief on insurance provisions, grasscrete requirement and the possible elimination of the eight (8) northern parking stalls. Contact Karen Gandy regarding this item. 22. Agenda Item No. 10D. Award of bid to JRJ Paving, Inc. for the reconstruction of Harrell Drive from Johnson Road to Jordan Drive. Harrell Drive is scheduled for reconstruction. This project will repave Harrell Drive from Johnson Road to Jordan Drive. The roadway width will not change. The engineering cost is $14,700. The low bidder for this project was JRJ Paving, Inc. in the amount of $160,763.63. Thus the total cost of this project is $175,463.63, which is $35,463.63 above the budgeted amount of $140,000. The project exceeded the budgeted amount primarily because of drainage improvements included in the bid that were unforeseen during the estimation of the project. Staff recommends Council award the bid to JRJ Paving, Inc. in the amount of $160,763.63 for the reconstruction of Harrell Drive from Johnson Road to Jordan Drive. Please call Senior Civil Engineer Shawn Poe if you have any questions. 23.Agenda Item No. 10E. Award of bid to Whizcon Utilities, Inc. for the installation of water line improvements to serve Napa Valley Estates and Woodland Heights Addition. The purpose of this project is to interconnect three dead-end water lines, is located in Napa Valley Estates, Woodland Heights Addition, and Cambridge Crossing. As stated in the memo by Senior Civil Engineer Shawn Poe, the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 16 of 18 construction of this water line interconnection will sustain the water pressure to residents in these areas. During peak water usage periods, these residents experience fluctuations in pressure. The improvements will also "loop" the water lines, which will minimize service interruptions. The CIP budget has $30,000 appropriated for this project. The low bidder was Whizcon Utilities, Inc. in the amount of $54,460. The bid price exceeds the budgeted amount primarily because the project had more water line installed by bore, rather than open trench cut, than was estimated. Due to the fact that the proposed water line will be located in the backyards of residents, the amount of water line installed by bore was increased so the residential property will be disturbed less during construction. Staff recommends Council award the bid to Whizcon Utilities, Inc. for the installation of the water line improvements. Call Shawn Poe if you have any questions. Other Items of Interest 24. Texas Amateur Athletic Federation (TAAF) State Basketball Tournament. The City of Southlake hosted the TAAF state basketball tournament Friday, March 17 through Sunday, March 19. A total of 93 teams from all over Texas played more than 140 games during the three-day tournament. This was an excellent opportunity to showcase Southlake to people from throughout the state, and we received several compliments from participants on the organization of the tournament, the staff and the facilities. Recreation Supervisor Steve Moore attended a TAAF regional meeting on Wednesday March, 22, and several of the member cities mentioned how pleased their teams were with the tournament, and also complimented the officials. (These are the same officials we use during the regular season.) Steve and his recreation staff worked very hard on this tournament and reflected a very positive image of Southlake to our many out-of-town visitors. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council • Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 17 of 18 25. Census 2000 is upon us. Census forms should have been delivered to, or are on the way to, Southlake homes by now. The city has worked with the bureau to update address lists for its use, and is currently participating in its New Construction Program to add homes that have been built since last October. In order for Southlake to be properly counted-which is very important for many reasons of health, safety and welfare-please complete your form and return it to the Census Bureau. If for some reason you have not received a form, please contact Senior Planner Chris Carpenter. He can make sure the Census Bureau provides you with the forms you need. 26. Economic Development. Attached is a memo from Economic Development discussing various topics. Contact Greg Last or Stefanie Wagoner if you have any questions or comments. 27. Friday Traffic Report. Speeding continues to be a topic of great interest to our residents. (Recently staff became aware of concerns of Southridge Lakes residents, as an example.) To ensure that we communicate our enforcement efforts to our residents, DPS Director Garland Wilson has developed the "Friday Traffic Report," which will be distributed to interested residents via e-mail each week. A copy of the report is included. 28. Mid-Year Review. A tentative date for the mid-year review has been scheduled for April 25. This date appeared to be the best option for most of you. If you have any problems with this schedule please let me know. More information will follow concerning time, place, and agenda. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest For City Council meeting April 4, 2000 Page 18 of 18 29. Also attached to my memo: • "Kudos" L. • BC Staff Extension Numbers: Campbell, Billy, City Manager, ext. 701 Elam, Sharen, Finance Director, ext. 716 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, Public Works Director, ext. 779 Hugman, Kevin, Director of Community Services, ext. 757 Jackson, Malcolm, Administrative Operations Coordinator, ext. 726 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 Martinson, Lynn, Assistant Finance Director, ext. 833 Polasek, Steve, Deputy Director Community Services, ext. 772 Queen, Courtney, Community Services Coordinator, ext. 827 Safranek, Lauren, Director of Human Resources, ext. 836 Siemer, Shelli, Assistant to the City Manager, ext. 806 Thomas, Charlie, City Engineer, ext. 814 Wilson, Garland, Director of Public Safety, ext. 735 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 tt.mTa l.e.e EXISTING LAM)USE MJIBER OF GROSS GROSS RESIDENTIAL e1 ZONING RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE DENSITY Vol.• • LOTS r0.0./ACREJ Iot amt...lr_`""rl 371 Pa..„mN.n...r«MOM am In. .ee.,r.el.r,act comet. r.rr. SF/A LOW DENSITY 55 65.5 0.80Oncraartarocs�r toll. ® - SF B r,.e. rMk 1 ,.. "«.0 aner.a Price 1 .� 1..r N`.N.a..: ram.C..r N.sap NO Prue s..010..I•11 NOTE. :°MN.'u::.N.1...N...ar..ei..l•rt•.;r:i::w N«,.Om, l _ Eque I i Trod l0 be Dedicated nan.m m`e Io The City Of South.. N. . . u.Nv.l set.l...a.m«m ae Num Point of BOB JONES ROAD INeee t ms l.a'Ll.N...a.ar '";n `N �Beginning r..r.•.. . line N.N.ea a..... ...rl...at n. 1.1...r..e r..re. _ S 90_00'OowF JPr sed 60'Right-Of-We / J i_ 114.0 y _ __ - - _���- =J -__ L _ ixroarw:lvs•the wet.. __ lane , • '�..'- ,n' .r.117 ,I b6_a r' iw N6' --wF: •,N,.ar rry rru.. 1 I J ' r 0P`s .. ract NrsaaPlate o.r I - �1,,,"_f, C7 ..'.�llerrrr�.nr VICINITY MAP IO L A6.rATm ; I :rltlr r 41.1 i A�. ant , r..wr.N w. .�p.Mi. ora 1.a Wry.N ....r. :,1_r I > .�Or pd.,. I 1 f I 1r :::" ..�I......1 :ft".:���:wr�era1 Clark..a. 1. .r e r� NN. �; •¢ Jitr tiikks. 6 .. .1r° ywr.r M• IIK 1 I d la' Iryr e 1....�•. : erect.. .ant corn,tti, e U "- �. L _ J �� i< ,$. ....1.. . .,��I...e tract. ...mal.l. . ..Nm...N�.lr.1 ..........ar.,r. e.N N. .........,m r ' ' It 4AKSl y Inv .O• I I , 4 kPFrt Mt. is 4't.�Iryr IN P �� S', `?-`, tlrL_1 6'_ __NL' L'_ l.e__J K,( . ..N. -•N.N...CI... .w.....r el T e...N...els....tl.•4.N 1e.a a..L Matt r L. t T— "'(� L � 84 V$�`w ;o-__—I I_ 1.1..e N.Nell tri.rr .re•rw..w.r N..•.rr w e Ole..m p ..a W N erwn cw v.aw SO rte.•int a u.«.1 Ns.Ir.rwrn. •••\ra - -, ' 1= irn.i:A:ll .e� Nw �..��. ru.:TlrMc. m `� L3. rf• r NL NL' l.i' f Ni' ' '� _ ' �C_, .i E I I I.o'.. -III--- , : 14 _ 7 o ay..rlt1.� ..........ar.r•r.. .,I...•a.I./ .N>r.DT �.• r .. .,r..1_.Nr_ .... .r m. .._ .«.. aw 1 Ca..T 1 1 I I _ f)L' _ 0o aN • p 1. LM.�,/�' ,I y. I I� Is 1F' It 1.� Ih /:'• �r. , 1� :�'N �1!•.L N/'i+. • �l•Irnel +.c , .... \ z�I. $I I �$ I I ; I u u., rt69;I I [/ .ell 1 N4' Nf' Z'�. =-vim-'_ -==-T=--- __: L__-=°•S'�_-L_ merle,. I I II _bra_a __ ____ SB9'39_20'E •_ 1857.31' _ yr b� NB9'SB'10'Y 397.HI. :W '.1-- 'a-_=__�L'-1Y4___)_— I --tt-d77' NI• —MT' F�Ml, .� IN• - —j.—�rr--p- N- -T —_�'_w [ h •r id•�—I9TS - �r_�. —� � .. ........ I NI Nr NI Nr Hr— _1 ."1 I r 1yqq rN • O • • 13 • 0 W N z3 roa• "E . Y 300.57 �L I _ � I ' �'m,,t. K L.. I �I �I P. vI J'-// AY• 1iti NT' w NI_�L_�l_�__i_�NI• Nl__ NI' L NI' I Nl� NI• I Mom NI g Nr a �a JE." -CRO VN�__dP�' _. • °� �B1VAF OYPIV-_____ .. —___._ !` __ 90.03' pr�/ \ ['\ .'1; Y'.• ' Ot• T -Nr— •�N9' K� �• 1 r NJ' MJ' �MJ' NJ' N!' NJ' FL"- NJ� ON! NJ'- I Ir a II— , F:_.,.. r. em s. —�- "` I 'I • I —I�a 4 I �-I 1; • g 1 I 1 1 �J71 Q �bJ7I "81 • ' ' 8r1 �,e,M rre.._J1� • 1 I li.. . : 6 `III HII M Z'i1 A b' ili[ •,N]J A a e'1t =�., / .�TII . 'I' _ I �I� ��, gl M 51 '. M RI • I '1 co 00.05'S0'E r I 4;j rl \_ " ;I b I ZI .1 '• a' u1 I 1 I = 11 . 211.66' 1 , o Ir.at,I Z a z.pK\ 41 I , I I A+� _ •I ;r o .v�r• F r .... I �. I I u 1• rr LL_S=��y.=1-6-6= ' -,- __ NI -L ' N -T. N,_.__ MJ• r �J �_.JS� _ . .�— �_ t`N�' N!' NJ' N. J NJ' 1 =J�- N B9'SI'JO-N IJ9.�' xa..w ..+M r.._.,. . _ - ____�-- _-- ---_� '• N 89'37'41 Y -25Po B9' ___z ra "r1 - Pa U t�{> k L A' Y Preliminary Plat eel 3 CROWN RIDGE ADDITION g N BEING '. ! 65.469 ACRES I. • OWNER/DEVELOPER: PREPARED BY: SITUATED 1111118 W E Terra Land Development Co. GOODWINI RDPRICESURVEY • NDrE+RESTRICTED DRIVEWAY ACCESS 2740 Fuller Wiser __MARSH ALL[ y ABSTRACT No.992 There shall be no driveway Euless. Texas 78039 LTn,-....I6_RMaEli4_ y«cess t er,aBled Euless. ss. Texas 76 3 CITY OF SO[7PHLAKE,DENTON COUNTY,TFJ(AS .S R T.W.Kira,Bob.tiles and While Chapel LOTS MAR('� (' ZOO Rood, to Me explion of Lol 9, Black 3 eml Iri0p.5wt01.100.TM NbrI.To lent (y`r-�.ii �e (,�j MAR.SCALE 1-.,m' access to T.W.Kig. UNNIE JOHNSON Iwo le1n 4264373 ZONED eV_ 4001 T.W.King Road SP-1A SIMiB-PAtt➢.Y RESIDENTIAL DISTRICtE T .. Q Roanoke. Texas 76282 ° roo eio 000 CITY CASE No. 7A00-16 FEBRUARY.2000 /" City of Southiake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning& Zoning Commission Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development(ext. 750) Stefanie Wagoner, Economic Development Specialist(ext. 776) SUBJECT: Miscellaneous Economic Development Topics Following are some topics or projects that may be of interest to you. Feel free to contact either of us should you have any questions or comments. Gateway Plaza, Phase 2 You are probably aware that Terry Wilkinson has started the approval process for Gateway Plaza Phase 2(between Phase 1 and Lowes). One of his main anchors is Costco and attached you will find a "Revenue Estimation" on that project, estimating the tax revenues generated by the project. This spreadsheet is still "work-in-progress" so we will make you aware of any changes that occur to the estimates. Project Profiles A "Project Profile Summary" was created as a quick-glance reference to be added to the City website,as a lead-in to the formal project profile for each profile. It was also handed out at the City booth at the Town Square birthday celebration on March 25,2000. It is attached for your reference. Aventerra Gensler,the architecture firm selected for the Aventerra Project(spear-headed by Steve Yetts),has recently been given the "2000 AIA Architecture Firm of the Year Award" by the American Institute of Architects. The Year 2000 Architecture Firm Award is the highest honor given by the AIA to an architectural practice,recognizing firms that have consistently produced distinguished architecture and have had a significant impact on the profession. ISIS Papyrus Attached you will find an article in the March 31, 2000 edition of the Dallas Business Journal regarding the proposed ISIS Papyrus development in Southlake Bank Place, located behind the Kirby's Steakhouse. Last week we forwarded to you company information as found on the ISIS Papyrus website. Enc: Gateway Plaza Phase 2 Revenue Estimation Spreadsheet Project Profile Summary 2000 AIA Architecture Firm of the Year Announcement Article "Austrian software firm to hire 150, put up U.S. HQ in Southiake" N:\Econdev\Corresp\City\CM\00-03-31.doc City of Southlake Page 1 , Dept. of Economic Development March 30, 2000 5:10 p.m. Project: GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE 2 ASSUMPTIONS/INPUT SUMMARY* A B C D E F G H I J K INPUT INPUT INPUT INPUT INPUT INPUT INPUT INPUT INPUT INPUT or E*I INPUT Real Property Value Per Square Foot Identification (Sq. Ft.) Personal Total Gross % Phase Blk-Lot Description Land Building Land Building Property Sales _ Annual Sales Taxable 2 B1-L1 Bldg 1 - Pad Restaurant 744,502 7,400 $ 10.00 $ 100.00 $ 30.00 $ 337.84 $2,500,016 100 2 B1-L1 Bldg 2- Pad 6,000 $ 100.00 $ 30.00 $ 333.33 $1,999,980 100 2 B1-L1 Bldg 3- Retail 7,100 $ 62.00 $ 70.00 $250.00 $1,775,000 100 2 B1-L1 Bldg 4- Retail Sub-Anchor 9,155 $ 55.00 $ 85.00 $ 250.00 $2,288,750 100 2 B1-L1 Bldg 5- Retail Sub-Anchor 35,000 $ 55.00 $ 90.00 $400.00 $14,000,000 100 2 B1-L1 Bldg 6- Retail Anchor 85,000 $ 52.00 $ 45.00 $ 564.71 $48,000,350 35 2 B1-L1 Bldg 7- Retail 12,560 $ 62.00 $ 60.00 $250.00 $3,140,000 100 2 B1-L1 Bldg 8- Pad 4,100 $ 100.00 $ 30.00 $ 365.85 $1,499,985 100 2 B2-L1 Bldg 9-Retail 181,029 26,600 $ 10.00 $ 62.00 $ 75.00 $ 300.00 $7,980,000 100 2 B2-L1 Bldg 10- Pad 7,225 $ 100.00 $ 30.00 $415.22 $2,999,965 100 2 B2-L2 Bldg 11 -Costco 712,352 148,000 $ 10.00 $ 52.00 $ 70.00 $ 675.68 $100,000,640 72.5 Totals 1,637,883 348,140 $186,184,686 *Comments/References B, E- Source is Concept Plan dated 2-14-00 F, G, H, I, J, K-Source is Terry Wilkinson/Lincoln Properties D-Source is preliminary plat dated March 7, 2000 City of Southlake Page 2 Dept. of Economic Development March 30, 2000 5:10 p.m. Project: GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE 2 REAL PROPERTY-LAND A B C L M N 0 P Q INPUT INPUT INPUT (D*F) (L'rate/100) (L'rate/100) (L*rate/100) (L*rate/100) (M:P) Annual Tax Revenue Identification Taxable 0.422000 1.790000 0.264836 0.340480 Phase Blk-Lot Description Value Slake ISD County Other Total 2 B1-L1 Bldg 1 -Pad Restaurant $7,445,020 $31,418 $133,266 $19,717 $25,349 $209,750 2 B1-L1 Bldg 2- Pad $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 B1-L1 Bldg 3- Retail $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 B1-L1 Bldg 4- Retail Sub-Anchor $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 B1-L1 Bldg 5- Retail Sub-Anchor $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 B1-L1 Bldg 6- Retail Anchor $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 B1-L1 Bldg 7- Retail $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 B1-L1 Bldg 8- Pad $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 B2-L1 Bldg 9- Retail $1,810,290 $7,639 $32,404 $4,794 $6,164 $51,002 2 B2-L1 Bldg 10- Pad $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 B2-L2 Bldg 11 - Costco $7,123,520 $30,061 $127,511 $18,866 $24,254 $200,692 Totals $16,378,830 $69,119 $293,181 $43,377 $55,767 $461,443 Notes: P-"Other" includes Hospital District(.234070)and College District(.106410) City of Southlake Page 3 , Dept. of Economic Development March 30, 2000 5:10 p.m. Project: GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE 2 REAL PROPERTY-BUILDING A B C R S T U V W INPUT INPUT INPUT (E'G) (R*rate/100) (R'rate/100) (R*rate/100) (R*rate/100) (S:V) Annual Tax Revenue Identification Taxable 0.422000 1.790000 0.264836 0.340480 Phase Blk-Lot Description Value Slake ISD County Other Total 2 B1-L1 Bldg 1 - Pad Restaurant $740,000 $3,123 $13,246 $1,960 $2,520 $20,848 2 B1-L1 Bldg 2- Pad $600,000 $2,532 $10,740 $1,589 $2,043 $16,904 2 B1-L1 Bldg 3- Retail $440,200 $1,858 $7,880 $1,166 $1,499 $12,402 2 B1-L1 Bldg 4- Retail Sub-Anchor $503,525 $2,125 $9,013 $1,334 $1,714 $14,186 2 B1-L1 Bldg 5-Retail Sub-Anchor $1,925,000 $8,124 $34,458 $5,098 $6,554 $54,233 2 B1-L1 Bldg 6 - Retail Anchor $4,420,000 $18,652 $79,118 $11,706 $15,049 $124,525 2 B1-L1 Bldg 7-Retail $778,720 $3,286 $13,939 $2,062 $2,651 $21,939 2 B1-L1 Bldg 8- Pad $410,000 $1,730 $7,339 $1,086 $1,396 $11,551 2 B2-L1 Bldg 9-Retail $1,649,200 $6,960 $29,521 $4,368 $5,615 $46,463 2 B2-L1 Bldg 10- Pad $722,500 $3,049 $12,933 $1,913 $2,460 $20,355 2 82-L2 Bldg 11 -Costco $7,696,000 $32,477 $137,758 $20,382 $26,203 $216,821 Totals $19,885,145 $83,915 $355,944 $52,663 $67,705 $560,227 City of Southlake Page 4 , Dept. of Economic Development March 30, 2000 5:10 p.m. Project: GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE 2 PERSONAL PROPERTY A B C X Y Z AA AB AC INPUT _ INPUT INPUT (E'H) (X'rate/100) (X'rate/100) (X*rate/100) (X'rate/100) (Y.-AB) Annual Tax Revenue Identification Taxable 0.422000 1.790000 0.264836 0.340480 Phase BIk-Lot Description Value Slake ISD County Other Total 2 B1-L1 Bldg 1 - Pad Restaurant $222,000 $937 $3,974 $588 $756 $6,254 2 B1-L1 Bldg 2 - Pad $180,000 $760 $3,222 $477 $613 $5,071 2 B1-L1 Bldg 3- Retail $497,000 $2,097 $8,896 $1,316 $1,692 $14,002 2 B1-L1 Bldg 4 - Retail Sub-Anchor $778,175 $3,284 $13,929 $2,061 $2,650 $21,924 2 B1-L1 Bldg 5- Retail Sub-Anchor $3,150,000 $13,293 $56,385 $8,342 $10,725 $88,745 2 B1-L1 Bldg 6- Retail Anchor $3,825,000 $16,142 $68,468 $10,130 $13,023 $107,762 2 B1-L1 Bldg 7- Retail $753,600 $3,180 $13,489 $1,996 $2,566 $21,231 2 B1-L1 Bldg 8- Pad $123,000 $519 $2,202 $326 $419 $3,465 2 B2-L1 Bldg 9- Retail $1,995,000 $8,419 $35,711 $5,283 $6,793 $56,205 2 B2-L1 Bldg 10- Pad $216,750 $915 $3,880 $574 $738 $6,107 2 B2-L2 Bldg 11 - Costco $10,360,000 $43,719 $185,444 $27,437 $35,274 $291,874 Totals $22,100,525 $93,264 $395,599 $58,530 $75,248 $622,642 , City of Southlake Page 5 , Dept. of Economic Development March 30, 2000 5:10 p.m. Project: GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE 2 SALES TAX A B C AD AE AF AG AH INPUT INPUT INPUT (J*K/100) (AD'rate) (AD*rate) (AD*rate) (AE:AG) Annual Tax Revenue Identification Taxable 1% 0.50% 0.50% 2.00% Phase _ BIk-Lot Description Sales Gen Fund SPDC CCPD Total 2 B1-L1 Bldg 1 - Pad Restaurant $2,500,016 $25,000 $12,500 $12,500 $50,000 2 B1-L1 Bldg 2-Pad $1,999,980 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $40,000 2 B1-L1 Bldg 3 - Retail $1,775,000 $17,750 $8,875 $8,875 $35,500 2 B1-L1 Bldg 4- Retail Sub-Anchor $2,288,750 $22,888 $11,444 $11,444 $45,775 2 B1-L1 Bldg 5- Retail Sub-Anchor $14,000,000 $140,000 $70,000 $70,000 $280,000 2 B1-L1 Bldg 6-Retail Anchor $16,800,123 $168,001 $84,001 $84,001 $336,002 2 B1-L1 Bldg 7- Retail $3,140,000 $31,400 $15,700 $15,700 $62,800 2 B1-L1 Bldg 8-Pad $1,499,985 $15,000 $7,500 $7,500 $30,000 2 B2-L1 Bldg 9- Retail $7,980,000 $79,800 $39,900 $39,900 $159,600 2 B2-L1 Bldg 10- Pad $2,999,964.50 $30,000 $15,000 $15,000 $59,999 2 B2-L2 Bldg 11 -Costco $72,500,464 $725,005 $362,502 $362,502 $1,450,009 Totals $127,484,282 $1,274,843 $637,421 $637,421 $2,549,686 City of Southlake Page 6 , Dept. of Economic Development March 30, 2000 5:10 p.m. Project: GATEWAY PLAZA PHASE 2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TAX REVENUE- GRAND TOTALS A B C Al AJ AK AL AM INPUT INPUT INPUT (=Q) (=1O (=AC) (=AH) (AI:AL) Real Real Real Identification Property Property Property Phase Blk-Lot Description Land Building Personal Sales Total 2 B1-L1 Bldg 1 - Pad Restaurant $31,418 $3,123 $937 $50,000 $85,478 2 B1-L1 Bldg 2-Pad $0 $2,532 $760 $40,000 $43,291 2 B1-L1 Bldg 3- Retail $0 $1,858 $2,097 $35,500 $39,455 2 B1-L1 Bldg 4-Retail Sub-Anchor $0 $2,125 $3,284 $45,775 $51,184 2 B1-L1 Bldg 5- Retail Sub-Anchor $0 $8,124 $13,293 $280,000 $301,417 2 B1-L1 Bldg 6- Retail Anchor $0 $18,652 $16,142 $336,002 $370,796 2 B1-L1 Bldg 7-Retail $0 $3,286 $3,180 $62,800 $69,266 2 B1-L1 Bldg 8- Pad $0 $1,730 $519 $30,000 $32,249 2 B2-L1 Bldg 9- Retail $7,639 $6,960 $8,419 $159,600 $182,618 2 B2-L1 Bldg 10- Pad $0 $3,049 $915 $59,999 $63,963 2 B2-L2 Bldg 11 - Costco $30,061 $32,477 $43,719 $1,450,009 $1,556,267 Totals $69,119 $83,915 $93,264 $2,549,686 $2,795,984 • m4 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE _ _ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Southl ake — PROJECT PROFILE SUMMARIES MARCH 21, 2000 SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE • 130 acres bound by SH 114 to the north,FM 1709 to t the south,and Carroll Ave.to the west • Zoning: NR-PUD with C-3 General Commerical uses (109 acres);SP-1 with C-3 uses(8 acres);C-3 (13 " -. '. I*1'41 P GPI a `' �L�A �' ' qN►���� acres) • Over 2 million total s.f.retail,office,restaurant uses; ��,. . -�' n tilt" 3 r. • over 380,000 s.f.in Phase I 01I • Phase I Grand Opening-March 1999;Phase II and Town Hall Grand Opening-October 2000;Phase III Grand Opening -Fourth Quarter 2000 • Town Hall Tenants: • City of Southlake offices: City Manager,City Secretary,Economic Development,Finance,GIS,Human Resources, Library,Municipal Court,Planning,Public Safety Substation,Public Works,Water Utilities • Tarrant County office: Constable,County Clerk,County Commissioner,Justice of the Peace,Tax Collector SABRE CORPORATE CAMPUS • 175 total acres at the intersection of SH 114 & ,*. Kirkwood Blvd.: 156 acres to be added to the 4.4, • existing 21-acre 375,057 s.f.development • Zoning: "NR-PUD" with"0-2"Office District and ww I w www w w w■ I,dw• wwal other related uses =N w-` ,47fit {r►T- . , • $540 million capital investment x • ••'�'i" • $14 billion impact on the regional economy • 2,011,000 s.f new construction to be phased over 8 years • Phase I:460,000 s.f.,scheduled for completion in the latter half of 2001 GATEWAY PLAZA • 38 acres at the intersection of SH 114&FM 1709 ,r • Zoning: "SP-2"Generalized Site Plan District with limited"C-3" ' General Commercial District uses • 357,000+s.f.retail&restaurant uses,with two pad sites for future 1®i development • Grand Opening-August 2000 gpt CROSSROADS SQUARE • 7.7 acres at the intersection of FM 1709& White Chapel Blvd. • Zoning: "SP-2"Generalized Site Plan District ' ' with limited"C-3"General Commercial Ian bi.y „4 District uses — -- — • 78,000 s.f retail and office uses • Grand Opening-July 2000 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT • 17.5 acres bound by SH 114 to the north,FM 1709 to the south,and Kimball Ave.to the west • d0©6L3 Zoning:"C-3"General Commercial District. 0 0�10i0n0 plp� • 135,000 s.f home improvement warehouse with _ELF!m, bm , 20,000 s.f garden center • Grand Opening-November 2000 For expanded information on the projects presented here,please contact our office at(817) 481-5581 ext. 776 (econdevna ci.southlake.tx.us), or visit the City's website at www.ci.southlake.tx.us/whats_new/commerciaLasp. 2000 AIA Architecture Firm of the Year Gensler We are pleased to announce that Gensler has been named the Architecture Firm of the Year by the American Institute of Architects. The Year 2000 Architecture Firm Award is the highest honor given by the AIA to an architectural practice, recognizing firms that have consistently produced distinguished architecture and have had a significant impact on the profession. "The year zoo° is an appropriate one to honor a firm that has consistently pushed the boundaries of architecture. Gensler pioneered the practice of interior design, and has used the diversity of its work and services to drive innovation. In design expression, its buildings reflect its clients'renewed understanding that place matters, that architecture has strategic value. In honoring Gensler with the Architecture Firm Award in this millennial year, we acknowledge both their accomplishments and their importance to our profession as a model for the future." —Michael Stanton, FAIA, President,American Institute of Architects a 'Irn CVI.k h 3 i,a Austrian software firm io hire 150, said the awnings befuddled up Planning &Zoning Commission, which approved them nonetheless. U.S. H Q I n Southlake "They're trying to keep a certain archi- tectural flavor with the free-flowing ma- terial," said Karen Gandy, Southlake's By CHRISTINE PEREZ Max and Annemarie Pucher founded zoning administrator."It will be up to the Staff Writer ISIS Papyrus in 1988. In less than 12 council now to grant them a variance." e� SOUTHLAKE — ISIS Pa- years, they've built privately held ISIS The awnings, though, pale in com- ated pyrus, the leading into a$55 million company with offices in parison to the challenge posed by a 50- ory: supplier of business more than 20 countries.Only about a third foot-tall entrance sculpture the Puchers Page 15 document software of the firm's revenue comes from the U.S., hope to erect. Barron described it as an solutions in Europe said Letz,but that should soon change. abstract-art, Plexiglas version of an oil and Asia, is planning to build its "There is so much opportunity here," derrick. He said the Puchers hope to North American headquarters and she said. "That is why we have come to have a competition to design the sculp- training center in Southlake. this country.If you are stationed locally, ture, if the city approves it: The company, based in Vienna, you can much more easily handle the Gandy said the commission has code Austria,currently has two offices in needs of the companies here." ordinances to consider. "District regula- the Metroplex—one in Colleyville Letz said the Puchers,who travel fre- tions state that freestanding structures and another in North Richland quently, were attracted to Dallas after cannot exceed 35 feet in height,"she said. Hills. Both will be consolidated several visits to the area. "They're proposing a 50-foot structure. into the new facility.ISIS Papyrus' "It's nothing like New York and But they said it was an identity feature,so only other U.S. office is in New nothing like Los Angeles," she said. we're now treating it like a sign." York Whtstate. le company currently "The owners started inquiring about Letz said the unique design of the business opportunities here and bought buildings should help attract and retain is 10 employees locally, it plans a home in Colleyville. About two-and- employees. w hire at least 150 technicians,! a-half years ago, they bought the prop- "We will be hiring highly specialized salespeople and consultants by the erty in Southlake. Back then, it was technicians, consultants and salespeo- time its new headquarters is ready, much easier to find land here." pie,and it's very hard said Edith Letz,business develop-. to find these people, ISIS Papyrus ment manager for ISIS Papyrus Unconventional design even in technologi- America Inc. America Inc. Construction of the Designing the Southlake project re- cally advanced areas Business:Develops, $6 million facility is scheduled to quired some unconventional thinking,said like Dallas,"she said. distributes and sup- start in June, with completion set ports high-end busi- Greg Barron,whose company,Fort Worth- "We want to make it ness document soft- for late this year or early in 2001. based GL Barron,is handlingconstruction attractive and com- ware solutions The campus-style development of the ISIS Papyrus campus as well. fortable and do what- Headquarters: will consist of six structures — a "As Americans, we started to design ever we can to hire Vienna,Austria 25,000-square-foot central building based on what most Americans want, them and keep them 1999 revenue: and five other buildings, each be- $55 million but we soon learned we had to change happy." tween 4,000 and 5,000 square feet, the way we were thinking," he said. Greg Last,director Local director: clustered around a large landscaped "These buildings are veryEuropean. of devel- Edith Letz,business and a small lake.The fa- g p community development man- courtyard cility will be located near State They ll have a very open atmosphere,a opment for South- ager lot of natural light and individual light- lake, said ISIS Pa- Address: Highway 114 and Southlake Boule- ing on tables,open workstations and no pyrus is a "great fit" 5505 Normandy yard on just more than 6 acres. Drive,Colleyville ISIS Papyrus'products are de- cubicles. The only enclosed areas will for the city. 76034 signed for enterprise-level, funds- be the conference rooms and break They II have Phone: rooms. People will be separated by good access to the (817)545-8159 mental business applications such plants,not walls." airports and roads web: as bank statements,insurance doc- uments and telecom and credit card The Puchers admired the style of the without needing the www.isis- s`` rents. Customers include larger home of one of their Colleyville neigh- high-dollar front ex- papyrus.com bors, Texas Rangers catcher Ivan posure to the highways," he said. "And t and governments and insurance, "Pudge" Rodriguez, as well as.awnings for Southlake, they're a nice, clean, health care,financial and telecommuni- cations firms. they saw at Denver International Airport. back-office professional company with Both were incorporated into the design a creative campus." of the new corporate campus. Barron Reach Perez at cbeyerperez@amcity.com or(817)837- 1082 ext.13. City of Southlake, Texas , MEMORANDUM March 29, 2000 • TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Friday Traffic Report As the City matures we must contend with increased traffic and provide safe travel over our roadways. The residents of Southlake have identified traffic speed and safety as our communities most prominent concern. DPS receives complaints on traffic and congestion on a regular basis. In an effort to respond to traffic concerns from residents we have developed a "Friday Traffic Report". This report will be sent out through e-mail each Friday from my office. Sean Lease (service delivery analysts) will create the report from information we receive each week. The report is available to anyone who makes a request to be added on the e-mail list. We also will make a link for the latest traffic reports on the city's web page. This report may contain the following information: Citations issued by street or neighborhood, accidents by intersection, answers to questions or community concerns received through Spin, Home Owners Associations, or individuals. Our goal is to provide regular communication to residents of Southlake through known methods. Anyone may receive the report, available by e-mail,with exception to open records request. 1111 Foryour review, we haveprovided a copyof the results of the spin surveys. Police Services received p Y favorable comments in the report. Confirming our responses to service request is appropriate at this time. We will continue to monitor our service demand and respond to request as needed. Please contact me for questions or comments you may have. GW/gvi&-) cc: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager Gary Gregg, Chief of Police Sean Lease, Service Delivery Analyst Attachments: Spin Survey • MEMORANDUM March 20, 2000 TO: Gary Gregg, Chief of Police FROM: Sean Lease, SDA SUBJECT: SPIN Survey(2-28-00) Results On February 28, 2000, a survey was sent to all the SPIN representatives. The purpose of the survey was to learn the individual SPIN groups concerns about crime in their area. On March 7, 2000, we began receiving the surveys back from the SPIN groups. The results of these surveys are summarized below. SPIN#1 Kim O'Brien: Mrs. O'Brien stated that traffic is their greatest concern and their greatest potential concern. Mrs. O'Brien said that there are speeders in and around the Soda Ridge and Bob Jones areas. Mrs. O'Brien said that the end of White Chapel is continuing to be an area of parties for kids, and referenced a potential jurisdictional agreement between the City and the Corps of Engineers as a potential solution to this problem. Mrs. O'Brien stated that the greatest area in need of improvement is seeing more of a police presence, adding that the speeding problem coupled with the number of walkers and family members pushing children in strollers is of great concern. Mrs. O'Brien closed by offering her services as the Director of the Southlake Equestrian Association by taking officers into the Corps property for familiarization of the area. SPIN#3 Mary McMahon: Mrs. McMahon was contacted by telephone after the deadline had expired. Mrs. McMahon stated that speeding in the neighborhood, especially by the adults in the area, is the greatest concern. Mrs. McMahon said that the traffic congestion in the neighborhood is the greatest potential concern. Mrs. McMahon cited the Ridgecrest/Dove intersection as the main area. Mrs. McMahon said that one particular area of concern apart from those listed above is a mapping error. Mrs. McMahon said that most maps that she has seen indicate that the street "Crescent" shows to intersect with Southlake Park Rd., when in fact it does not. Mrs. McMahon stated that other issues are the fact that the Public Safety Officers (PSOs) are great and"have really made a difference." Mrs. McMahon cited a recent fire at one of her neighbor's house where the PSO response was almost immediate. Gary Gregg SPIN Survey Results March 20, 2000 page#2 SPIN #5 Jan Francis: Mrs. Francis responded by saying their greatest concern is the traffic problem. Mrs. Francis said that the greatest potential problem is that of drugs and/or alcohol. Mrs. Francis cited Kimball Avenue and Carroll Avenue as the main traffic concerns, stating that the backups cause dangerous driving at times. Mrs. Francis did not offer an area in need of greatest concern and closed by saying that the Department is doing a great job and to keep up the good work. SPIN #6 Tim Miller: Mr. Miller was contacted by telephone after the due date had passed. Mr. Miller stated that speeding was the greatest area of concern and cited Shady Lane as the main problem. However, Mr. Miller said that there is not much of a problem currently. Additionally, Mr. Miller said that the greatest potential concern is speeding. Mr. Miller said that he would like to see additional (or more frequent)patrol in the neighborhood. SPIN #7 Darrell Faglie: Mr. Faglie advised that the main concern of his area is traffic (unspecific) and that his greatest potential concern is also traffic (unspecific). Mr. Faglie listed the are "where the two new schools and new stadium are being built on South Kimball" as the area of greatest concern. Mr. Faglie stated that another problem that the Southlake Department of Public Safety should be concerned with is cars squealing tires and congregating on Nolan Drive in Cornerstone Business Park all night. Mr. Faglie closed his response by saying that he felt as though the Southlake Department of Public Safety is one of the best police and fire departments in this area. SPIN #9E Edith Hutcheson: Mrs. Hutcheson stated that her greatest concern today is traffic in the neighborhood, especially speeding. Mrs. Hutcheson said that the area of greatest potential concern is that of continued problems with traffic, specifically speeding. Mrs. Hutcheson cited Byron Nelson Parkway as where the traffic problems are occurring. Mrs. Hutcheson's opinion of what needs the greatest improvement is increasing the number of officers in general. SPIN#9W Lynda Warner: Mrs. Warner was contacted by telephone after the due date had passed (although she stated she sent it in about 1 week ago). Mrs. Warner said that she recently had a SPIN open house and obtained the survey results via this. Mrs. Warner said that the Gary Gregg SPIN Survey Results March 20,2000 page#3 greatest concern is the traffic problem in Timarron. Specifically, the intersection of Byron Nelson and Continental,which has posed a long-standing problem with accidents. Mrs. Warner's area of greatest potential concern is also traffic, especially at the Brumlow and Continental intersection, where the new school is going to be built. Mrs. Warner said that the area of greatest improvement would be community programs. Mrs. Warner said that at her previous residence, there was a program involving neighborhood associations (similar to SPIN) and that each of these had their own police liaison officer. Each quarter, the associations and their officer would meet and discuss community concerns. SPIN #10 Al Morin: Mr. Morin responded by saying that their area of greatest concern today is traffic, and greatest potential concern is (again) traffic. Mr. Morin specified this by saying that people use Emerald as a cut through from White Chapel to Southlake Blvd. Mr. Morin said that the area in need of greatest improvement regarding the Department is needed more well trained officers as the City grows. Mr. Morin said that the main concern his group has is the back up of traffic on White Chapel from Southlake Blvd. well past the Bicentennial Park entrance, and that this causes difficulties for the residents of the area. Mr. Morin said that the planned improvements to the White Chapel — Southlake Blvd. intersection should help alleviate this. SPIN#12 Cameron McCartha: Mrs. McCartha was contacted by telephone after the due date had passed. Mrs. McCartha said that the greatest area of concern in her area is the speeders, generally in Cross Timber Hills,but especially in the Woodbrook area. Mrs. McCartha said that recently, Solana traffic has greatly increased in the neighborhood,which is causing problems. Mrs. McCartha's greatest potential concern is also of traffic in general,but especially if the new school goes in at Peytonville and Woodbrook. An area Mrs. McCartha said that needed attention is the "speed humps" in Coventry. Mrs. McCartha also said that there is a perception of a lot of enforcement in Coventry and no enforcement in Cross Timber Hills (rich vs. poor). SPIN#13 Bill Stone: Mr. Stone said that their greatest concern is traffic and greatest potential concern is the same. Mr. Stone said that the main area of this is on Southlake Blvd.,between Shady Oaks and Davis. Mr. Stone said that the Department should be aware of teenagers speeding in the neighborhoods. Gary Gregg SPIN Survey Results March 20, 2000 page#4 Mr. Stone did not offer an opinion on the area in need of greatest improvement, but asked the Department to keep up the good work. SPIN #14 Michael Conrads: Mr. Conrads said that the greatest concern of his neighborhood was that of traffic. Mr. Conrads said that the greatest potential problem is also traffic. Mr. Conrads identified the specific area of the Southlake Blvd./SH 114 "funnel". Additionally, Mr. Conrads said that the act of turning left out of the neighborhoods onto Southlake Blvd. continues to be a problem and that the lights of Southlake Blvd. need to be better synchronized. Mr. Conrads did not state what area the Department needs the greatest improvement. Mr. Conrads closed by thanking the Southlake Department of Public Safety for patrolling the neighborhoods. SPIN Representative David Baltimore: Mr. Baltimore said that his greatest concern is that of frequency of patrol in the neighborhoods. Mr. Baltimore's potential area of greatest concern is that of response times in emergencies. Mr. Baltimore did not offer where these problems area occurring. Mr. Baltimore said that the area in need of greatest improvement from the Department is that of response time. Mr. Baltimore said that as the City continues to grow, it is imperative to construct multiple Public Safety Centers, such as the expected facility near Randol Mill. Summary: Sixteen(16) surveys were sent out to all the current SPIN representatives and Mr. David Baltimore. Of these sixteen, eight(8) were returned completed, and four(4) representatives were contacted by telephone. Four(4) representatives did not respond, and despite attempts were not contacted. The majority of the responses were very specific in nature and were accompanied by exact or near exact locations of these concerns. The representatives expressed a variety of concerns regarding the question dealing with"Other Concerns". Analysis: The breakdown of responses is as follows: Question #1: 92% of respondents relied that some form of traffic was their greatest concern today. 8% responded by saying that the frequency of patrol in their neighborhood was most critical. Interestingly, not one respondent stated that their greatest concern today was that of alcohol and/or drugs nor juvenile crime. This seems to somewhat contradict the amount of calls we have received regarding these two topics. Gary Gregg SPIN Survey Results March 20, 2000 page# 5 Question #2: 83% of those returning the surveys stated that traffic was the greatest potential concern in their neighborhood. 8%returned a response of drugs and/or alcohol and 8% stated response times in emergencies was their greatest potential concern. Miscellaneous: Of those answering the question regarding what area the Department needs improvement, 44% stated that this would/could be accomplished by hiring more and better trained personnel. 11% indicated a need for more community involvement and 11% a need for more substations for decreased response time. As these seem to be interrelated, one could make the argument that 66% of the responses indicated a need for more personnel. The remaining three (3)responses are as follows: One indicated that public perception of a single incident needed to be improved; One stated"Keep up the good work; and one stated"None". Closing: In general, all responses were favorable regarding the Department and how the Department is handling itself. However, most responses seem to indicate that we need to continue to evolve and grow along with the community. The respondents that were contacted directly all stated that they appreciated the chance for input and hoped that this would be a program that continues. I am available if you have any questions or concerns. SL/sl cc: Garland Wilson, Director of Public Safety Kevin/Steve/ien. 1 sincere apologies for the delay in sending .ou this note. So much to do, so little time. Thank 'ou so verb, verb much for taking. the. time to present to the neighbors of SPIN i the proposed Olase. iI improvements of lob Jones Park and dour ideas on the. Tucker/Evestrian piece of propert- . I think dour new and revamped plan was de f nrtel to the liking f . neighbors Thanks for all of sour hard work and dedication to making, this proect work for evertone) We have ce.rtainl . come a lone. wad It is a pleasure to work with (dou c?t5 and all of the Park Staff I am proud to be. a member of the. Parks (hoard and to work with such dedicated folks. Thanks for dour patience and tour willingness to work with the people in ow neighborhoods - as always& Sincerer, Cara White , . ,,, J 'kt: •.,. ‘ ', c;'\-: r '►- k % i r ) IA [ R, L t n 1*A Mt.4. /tie I 3 tk4 i r ,1" r %c* , ,„__ , r , , E. , , , „J.. [ i. , §4 ) i r 1 = , , - 0 , ( ,-1, -4 1 = 1 - ,_ il ... ,,. P'k f,iw., , t A k , -- —.-,- ,! \a irl \ II t . ' , k [:* 11 , 1' A '1 4- 41! i� April 10 .. April 2000 May 2000 S hL_L_1N T F 5—___ 5 M T W. ._T_—F_—.5 13 1 11I 1 2 3 4 5 6 14 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 i9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 April 16 S 9 10 1112 14 15 21 21 15 16 17 18 19 27 16 16 17 188 20 19 20 21 22 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 17 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 22 28 29 30 31 18 30 Monday,April 10 Thursday,April 13 7:00pm Park Board(Sr.Center) 6:00pm 6:30pm SPIN Standing Committee((Sr.Center)) 7:00pm Joint Utilization Committee(CISD Admin Annex) Tuesday,April 11 Friday,April 14 1:15pm Sr.Advisory Committee(Sr.Activity Center) 12:00pm City of Southlake Volunteer Appreciation(Sr.Center) 6:00pm 6:30pm Drug&Alcohol Awareness Committee((City Hall)) 6:30pm 8:30pm D&A Round Table Discussion ((City Hall)) Wednesday,April 12 Saturday,April 15 5:00pm Youth Park Board(Community Center) 6:00pm 6:30pm Every 15 Minutes Committee Meeting 7:00pm 7:30pm Sister Cities Sunday,April 16 12:00pm Easter in the Park(Bicentennial Park) City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 23, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (ext. 757, 772) SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract with Avanti Landscape Management for annual mowing services for public right-of-ways Action Requested: City Council approval to authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract for annual mowing services for public right-of-ways with Avanti Landscape Management of Arlington, Texas in the amount of$25,995.00. Background Information: The FY 1999-2000 Parks and Recreation Division Budget contains a line item amount of $130,000 for contract mowing and landscape maintenance of City parks and facilities (142 acres), City right-of-ways and medians (50 acres), State right-of- ways for FM 1709, FM 1938, and Highway 114 (90 acres), and Town Square public areas (1.5 acres). The City parks and facilities contract with Minors Landscape Services was renewed in December 1999 for FY 2000 for $68,412. The Town Square public areas contract with Landscape Resources Incorporated was renewed in November 1999 for FY 2000 for $14,749.12. The FY 1999 contracts for State right-of-way mowing (VMC Landscape Management) and City right-of-way mowing (Avanti Landscape Management) expired on October 31, 1999. These contracts were bid in 1998, and were renewed last year, as the contracts allowed for one (1) twelve-month renewal. The contract adds State right-of-way mowing along FM 1938 from FM 1709 to the City limits, and adds two (2) properties for City right-of-way mowing (Pump Station #1 at the corner of FM 1709 and Pearson, and North White Chapel from Dove Road to the Tri-County Utility Easement Area). In order to increase efficiency, the two (2) projects were combined into one (1) contract for FY 2000. The proposed contract includes mowing and general landscape management services for public right-of-ways on an annual basis, and includes an annual renewal option for two (2) twelve-month periods. The State right-of-ways are mowed in addition to the three (3) annual mowing cycles performed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). The contract specifies that the contractor must coordinate the mowing schedule around the TxDOT mowing schedule. In addition to the City specifications, the contractor is required to comply with the mowing standards published in Chapter 2 of the TxDOT publication "Roadside Vegetation Management." The bid opening for this project was held on March 29, 2000. Staff conducted the bid process in compliance with applicable laws and procedures. Four (4) vendors submitted bids for the project, with Avanti Landscape Management of Arlington, Texas submitting the low bid in the amount of $25,995.00. Avanti Landscape Management provided satisfactory mowing services of City right-of-ways in the 1998 and 1999 seasons. Reference checks by staff with the cities of Fort Worth and ci Campbell, City Manager arch 23, 2000 Page 2 Arlington also indicated an overall satisfaction with the performance of Avanti Landcape Management on their projects. Financial Considerations: Four (4) vendors submitted bids for this project. Avanti Landscape Management of Arlington, Texas submitted the low bid in the amount of $25,995 (see attached bid tabulation). The bid amount increases the cost of mowing services for public right-of-ways by $4,006 or fifteen percent (15%) of the 1999 contracts, which totaled $21,989. The increased amount is due to the addition of new State and City right-of-ways, annual inflation, and increased labor and fuel costs. The FY 1999-2000 Parks and Recreation Budget allocates $130,000.00 for contract mowing services. The FY 2000 contracts with Minors Landscape Services ($68,412.86) and Landscape Resources Incorporated ($14,749.12) total $83,161.98, leaving an unencumbered balance of$46,838.02. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Not Applicable. Legal Review: The City Attorneys have reviewed the contract for compliance with applicable laws and procedures. Alternatives: Alternatives include the following: • Reject the mowing bid and proceed to reopen the bidding process. Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following: • Bid tabulation for annual mowing services for public right-of-ways. Staff Recommendation: Place as an item on the April 4, 2000 City Council agenda to authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract for annual mowing services for public right-of-ways with Avanti Landscape Management of Arlington, Texas in the amount of$25,995. KH 5&2 City of Southlake Department of Community Services BID TABULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Annual Mowing Services for Public right-of-ways PROJECT NUMBER: 00-162004C DATE: March 29, 2000 WORKING DAYS: Annual Contract ENGR. EST.: N/A BIDDER BID BOND BASE BID Avanti Landscape Management Yes $25,995.00 Arlington, Texas Joe Dickerson Yes $35,649.60 Hurst, Texas TruGreen Lawn Care Yes $83,360.00 Fort Worth, Texas Organized Maintenance Service Yes $120,160.00 Fort Worth, Texas 06-63-0003 5B-3 N:IParks&RecreationlBOARDSICC120001Qtr2IROWniowingBidtab.doc City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 28, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (ext. 757) SUBJECT: Resolution 00-33, Authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining fee simple ownership of land for use by the City as a park, library or for other public purposes Action Requested: City Council approval of Resolution 00-33, authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining fee simple ownership of a portion of land situated in the Littlebury G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, for use by the City as a park, library or for other public purposes permitted by law. Background Information: SPDC considered a proposal to acquire land situated in the Littlebury G. Hall, Abstract No. 686 Survey to expand Bicentennial Park to the west. At their January 24, 2000 meeting, the Board approved a motion (7-0) authorizing the City to negotiate with the owner of the land, Mr. Ralph W. Evans, to purchase the property. The proposed Resolution authorizes the City Attorney to begin a condemnation action to acquire a portion of Tracts 3C1 and 2A, and all of Tracts 3D1 and 2B of the Littlebury G. Hall, Abstract No. 686 Survey. This land totals approximately fourteen (14) acres, and would extend the western edge of Bicentennial Park to Shady Oaks in limited sections. SPDC reviewed the proposal during Executive Session at their March 27, 2000 meeting, and approved a recommendation to the City Council (7-0) to proceed with condemnation action on this property. Financial Considerations: SPDC has allocated $1,800,000 in the FY 1999-2000 Parks Capital Improvement Budget for land acquisition. Citizen Input/ Board Review: SPDC approved staff to begin negotiations for the purchase of this property at their January 24, 2000 meeting (7-0). SPDC approved a recommendation (7-0) to the City Council to take condemnation action on this property at their March 27, 2000 meeting. Legal Review: The City Attorneys have reviewed the information, and have drafted Resolution 00-33. 5cI Billy Campbell, City Manager March 28, 2000 page 2 Alternatives: Alternatives include the following: ■ Withhold approval of Resolution 00-33, and continue to negotiate with Mr. Ralph W. Evans for the sale of the property. Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: ■ Copy of Resolution 00-33, authorizing the City Attorneys to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining fee simple ownership of land situated in the Littlebury G. Hall, Abstract No. 686 Survey, for use by the City as a park, library, or for other public purposes permitted by law. ■ Exhibit A, Purchase Property Description for a portion of Tracts 3C1 and 2A, and all of Tracts 3D1 and 2B, situated in the Littlebury G.Hall, Abstract No. 686 Survey. ■ Exhibit B, Site Map detailing the proposed condemnation area. Staff Recommendation: Place as an item on the April 4, 2000 City Council agenda to approve Resolution 00-33, authorizing the City Attorney to bring a condemnation action for the purpose of obtaining fee simple ownership of land situated in the Littlebury G. Hall, Abstract No. 686 Survey, for use by the City as a park, library or other public purposes. KH SC2 RESOLUTION NO 00-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, DETERMINING THE NECESSITY OF ACQUIRING 14 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1 The City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas;hereby determines that a public necessity exists that requires acquisition of 14 acres of land,more or less,described in Exhibit"A"and depicted on Exhibit "B"attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2 The City council hereby finds that reasonable good faith negotiations have occurred with the property owner in an attempt to purchase the property and that a fair market value has been offered to the property owner for the property,which was rejected by the property owner. SECTION 3 The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to commence eminent domain proceedings in order to acquire the property. SECTION 4 The City Manager and City Attorney are authorized to comply with the statutes of the State of Texas with reference to the necessary legal prerequisites existing in or relating to the exercise of eminent domain to appropriate said property for the purpose of expanding existing park land. SECTION 5 The owner claiming an interest in said property is W. Ralph and Linda S. Evans whose mailing address is 315 Shady Oaks Drive, Southlake,Texas 76092. DULY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas on the day of April 2000. Rick Stacy,Mayor ATTEST Sandra LeGrand,City Secretary 5&3 City of Southlake, Texas EXHIBIT "A" PURCHASE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Property description of an approximate 13 acre tract being a portion of Tracts 3C1 and 2A; and all of Tracts 3D1 and 2B; situated in the Littlebury G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686 within the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas being further described as follows: COMMENCING at the northeasterly right-of-way corner of Farm to Market 1709 (Southlake Boulevard) and Shady Oaks. THENCE north to a distance of feet, being along the right-of-way of said Shady Oaks and the common southwesterly corner of said Tract 3C1 and northwesterly corner of adjoining Tract 3C to the POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE north to a distance of 230 feet, continuing along same said right-of-way and westerly limit of said Tract. THENCE east leaving said right-of-way to a distance of 300 feet. THENCE north to a distance of 305 feet. THENCE west to a distance of 35 feet. THENCE north to a distance of 310 feet, being a point on the northerly limit of said Tract 3C1 and same southerly limit of Tract 2A. THENCE continuing north to a distance of 160 feet, being a point on the common limit of said Tract 2A and 2B. THENCE west along same limit to a distance of 350 feet, being a point along said right-of-way and same common corner of said Tract 2A and 2B. THENCE north to a distance of 160 feet, being along same said right-of-way and westerly limit of Tract 2B to the common corner of said Tract and southwesterly corner of adjoining Tract 2C. THENCE east leaving said right-of-way to a distance of 730 feet, being along same said limit to the common corner of said Tract 2B and northwesterly corner of adjoining Tract 2B1. THENCE south to a distance of 160 feet, being along same said limits to the common corner of said Tracts 2A, 2B, and 2B1 and northwesterly corner of adjoining Tract 2A1. THENCE continuing south to a distance of 160 feet, being along same said limits to the common corner of said Tracts 2A and 2A1 and northeasterly corner of said Tract 3D1 and northwesterly corner of adjoining Tract 3D1A. THENCE continuing south to a distance of 837 feet, being along same said limits to the common corner of said Tracts 3D1 and 3D1A and being a point on the northerly limit of adjoining Tract 3D6. THENCE west to a distance of 40 feet, being along same said limits to the common corner of said Tracts 3C, 3C1, 3D1, and 3D6. THENCE continuing west to a distance of 610 feet, being along same said limits to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing approximately 13 acres of land. S&'I 44 o EXHIBIT "B" Q TR 2C x U ° 5.O AC � 1310 sea \ '� ~\ TR 281 TR : s \\ 2.825 • • 2.175 AC WO F, TR 3A1 1.70.\\ \ 1.00 ® TR 2A TR 2A1 0 h 0 • 1 \ 2.825 AC 2.175 AC 210 SJ 730 p t en n1 \�I �� Sal i / �• 3 ' r�AFL o Oki �. vR� 6 ,\ n .AL a sP,68 " 7 �\ 5.474 cc n 6 \ 1.0 TR 3C1 \ ` TR 3D1A — J 10.80A. '. 11.14 ® \ \ `\ sw N. \ \ \ N. 1\ . 810 \ 110 ----,, \ TR 3C TR 3D6 TR 3B i / 4.2758 ® �' 4.3165 CD 2.980 AC / ;O. isour� �n�'' 22957 ® ?.8685 314 \3299 TR 3D5 1.3538 NS ,-Ego.s•P lely for the use of FEET 200 30 in nssumes no resoonsihility W E 100 ._ ..d _pr.-7-- City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Lauren Safranek, Director of Human Resources (ext. 836) SUBJECT: Authorizing the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool Action Requested: Authorizing the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool — the City's dental insurance provider. Background Information: Currently, the TML Group Benefits Risk Pool (TML-GBRP) provides the City's dental insurance. Recently, TML formed the TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefit Pool (TML-IEBP) and transferred all asset of the TML- GBRP to the new trust TML-IEBP. This move was necessary because in 1979 when the TML-GBRP was developed, the welfare trust was set to expire in 21 years, or on May 1, 2000. Therefore, on September 17, 1999, the TML-IEBP was formed and will operate under Chapter 172 of the Local Government Code, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, and has similar purposes as the TML-GBRP. The original Trustees and officers of the TML-IEBP are the same as the current TML-GBRP Trustees and officers, and the policies and procedures will remain the same. On January 28, 2000, the TML-GBRP Board of Trustees voted to transfer all assets and liabilities to the TML-IEBP on April 1, 2000, and to terminate the TML-GBRP Trust on the same date. For these reasons, TML is requesting all Councils and governing bodies to sign a new agreement with TML-IEBP since TML-GBRP will no longer exist after April 1, 2000. The change will be almost transparent for the employees and our benefits are not changing. Financial Considerations: None Citizen Input/ Board Review: None Legal Review: Review by Attorneys. Alternatives: Not to sign, but then our contract with TML-GBRP may not be valid after April 1, 2000. Authorizing the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool Page 2 Supporting Documents: The TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool Interlocal Agreement. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to enter into the Interlocal Agreement with TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool. LDS 51-a TML INTERGOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS RISK POOL TML killIntergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool 0 I NwrER1 0 CAL A.GREENIT.Nr • RISK PARTICIPATING MEMBER 5b-3 T1\IL Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool Austin,Texas INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (RISK PARTICIPATING MEMBER) WHEREAS. the TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool, hereinafter referred to as TML-IEBP, is a legal entity created by political subdivisions of the state and governed by trustees, and is the successor of the Texas Municipal League Group Benefits Risk Pool formerly operating under the name of the Texas Municipal League Insurance Trust Fund,which was established May 1, 1979; and WHEREAS, the undersigned Employer Member represents that it is a political subdivision of the state and that its board and governing body has acted by majority vote, at a duly called and posted public meeting,to authorize and participate in this Interlocal Agreement; and WHEREAS, the undersigned political subdivision has examined all the facts and issues it deems relevant and determined that it is in the best interest of the political subdivision, its employees, officials, and retirees and their dependents to enter into this agreement and to obtain one or more life, sick, accident, and other health benefits, as well as the related services,by becoming a member of the TML-IEBP; WHEREAS, the TML-IEBP represents that it is a "local government" qualified to enter into this Interlocal Agreement pursuant to Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein set forth, the undersigned political subdivision, together with other political subdivisions executing identical or substantially similar Interlocal agreements, enters into this agreement for the purpose of providing certain benefits and related services for their employees, officials, and retirees and their dependents. The benefits will be provided under the authority of the laws of the State of Texas including the Texas Political Subdivision Uniform Group Benefits Program (Chapter 172, Local, Government Code), the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Chapter 791, Government Code) and the Texas Trust Code (Title 9, Subtitle B, Texas Property Code). The Employer Member hereby designates the TML-IEBP as its instrumentality to administer the business and supervise the performance of the Interlocal Agreement and the operation of the risk pool. All money transferred by the Employer Member to the TML-IEBP under this agreement, together with any other property which may become subject to this agreement, will be held in trust by the Board of Trustees of the TML-IEBP for the benefit of the employees, officials, and retirees and their dependents, of the Employer Members. The conditions of membership in the TML-IEBP are agreed upon by and between the parties as set forth hereinafter. Interlocal Agreement(rev. 10/1/99) Page 1 When used in this Interlocal Agreement, the capitalized terms shall have the meanings specified in this paragraph unless the context clearly requires otherwise: "Board of Trustees" or "Board" or "Trustees" means the trustees selected pursuant to the Trust Agreement Establishing the TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool to supervise the operation of the TML-IEBP. "Covered participant" means a person who is eligible for coverage and who has enrolled in a Plan. "Employee" means a person who works at least 20 hours a week for a political subdivision. "Plan" or "Plans" mean the TML-IEBP benefit plan(s) selected and adopted by the Employer Member. "Political subdivision" means any legal entity included within the definition of political subdivision in Chapter 172, Local Government Code or Chapter 791, Government Code, or otherwise qualified as a political subdivision under Texas Law. "TML-IEBP" means the TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool. 2. The Employer Member agrees to be bound by this Interlocal Agreement, the Trust Agreement Establishing the TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool, and the policies and procedures established by the TML-IEBP which collectively establish the conditions for membership in the TML-IEBP. 3. The Employer Member will adopt one or more of the TML-IEBP plans and make the payments and contributions set forth in the Summary of Benefits. Interest, beginning the first day after the due date and continuing until paid, shall accrue at the maximum rate allowed by law on the balance of any payment or contribution not paid when due. All such payments and contributions shall be paid from then current revenues and be available for payment of eligible benefits and administrative expenses for all participating Employer Members. 4. Except as may be otherwise specified in the TML-IEBP Trust Agreement Establishing the TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool, this agreement may be terminated by either the Employer Member or the TML-IEBP upon 30 days written notice which will become effective on the first day of the month following the 30 day notice. The TML-IEBP may terminate this agreement for non-payment of a payment or contribution immediately upon delinquency as determined by the TML-IEBP rules and regulations. Retroactive termination is not permitted and any terminated Employer Member shall not be entitled to any future excess contribution refunds or credits. 5. Every Employer Member shall furnish all the information the TML-IEBP deems necessary and useful for the purposes of this agreement and shall abide by the rules and regulations adopted for the administration of the benefits plans. The TML-IEBP may amend the rules, regulations and Trust Agreement Establishing the TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool at anytime to the extent it deems advisable except that no amendment shall change the purpose of the TML- IEBP. The TML-IEBP may employ and contract with a third party administrator. 6. The TML-IEBP will purchase excess loss coverage or reinsurance as provided in Chapter 172, Local Government Code, and all Employer Members are subject to the terms and conditions of any such excess loss coverage or reinsurance agreement. Interlocal Agreement(rev. 10/1/99) Page 2 Pr 7. Each Employer Member will designate and appoint a coordinator of department head rank or above and agrees that the TML-IEBP shall not be required to contact or provide notices to any other person. Further, any notice to, or agreement by an Employer Member's Coordinator, with respect to services or claims hereunder, shall be binding on the Employer Member. The Employer Member reserves the right to change the coordinator from time to time by giving written notice to the TML-IEBP. 8. The Employer Member hereby appoints the TML-IEBP as its agent to act in all matters pertaining to the processing and handling of claims and agrees to cooperate fully and provide all information necessary. All decisions on individual claims shall be made by the TML-IEBP. 9. The TML-IEBP shall be audited annually by an independent certified public accountant, and the audit shall be filed as required by the laws of the State of Texas including, but not limited to Chapter 172 of the Local Government Code. A summary financial report will be provided to each Employer Member annually. 10. All monies available for investment shall be invested by the TML-IEBP in compliance with the Public Funds Investment Act of 1987 (TEx. Gov'T CODE. ANN. Sec. 2256.001, et seq.) or the Texas Trust Code (Subtitle B, Title 9, Property Code). 11. Each Employer Member, as Plan Administrator, retains the right, duties and privileges of the Plan Administrator and acknowledges it has responsibility for compliance with the state and federal laws applicable to employees benefits. 12. The Employer Member agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the TML-IEBP for all claims, damages and expenses, including but not limited to attorney's fees and costs of court, arising out of acts or omissions of officers or employees of the Employer Member in connection with the Plan. The Employer Member agrees to pay all such claims, damages, and expenses out of current revenues at the time the obligation is determined. In the event current revenues are inadequate to fund the obligation at the time it is determined, the Employer Member agrees to take the appropriate budgetary action sufficient to pay the obligation. 13. The Employer Member agrees that all conditions of coverage for the benefits provided shall be as specified in the plan booklet/document furnished to the Employer Member by the TML-IEBP. The Employer Member agrees that the employees and the Board of Trustees of the TML-IEBP and individuals and entities with whom the TML-IEBP contract for staff functions may receive plan benefits. 14. Each Employer Member acknowledges that some plan benefits are provided in accordance with Chapter 172 of the Local Government Code. These benefits are not insurance and the TML- IEBP is not an insurer under the Insurance Code or other laws of the state. 15. The Employer Member and the TML-IEBP may contract for additional administrative services related to the Employer Member's employee benefit programs. 16. The Employer Member agrees that no participant shall have any claim against the property of the trust. The rights of participants are limited to the benefits specified in the Plan. ��✓CO Interlocal Agreement(rev. 10/1/99) Page 3 Pr 17. The Employer Members desire to join together to purchase life insurance benefiting their employees, officials, and retirees and their dependents. Therefore, the Employer Member authorizes the TML-GBRP to purchase life insurance coverage insuring the lives of all covered participants under the Plan. 18. No bond is required of the Board of Trustees of the TML-IEBP. 19. If any part of this agreement, save and except paragraph 3, is declared invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining parts and provisions shall continue in full force and effect. It is further agreed that venue for any dispute arising under the terms of this agreement shall be in Austin,Travis County, Texas. 20. This agreement represents the complete understanding of the TML-IEBP and the Employer Member and may not be amended, modified or altered without the written agreement of both parties. 21. The initial term of this Interlocal Agreement shall be from the_day of , 20_, at 12:01 a.m. and continue until . Absent notice of termination, the Employer Member may annually renew and extend the agreement by executing and returning the rerate notice and benefit selection form as authorized at the inception of this agreement. This agreement is entered into for the Employer Member under authorization of (EMPLOYER MEMBER) at duly called meeting held on (Date of Meeting) By (SIGNATURE) (Typed or Printed Name) Authorized Official Title Date This Agreement entered into and Appointment Accepted By: The TML Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool at Austin, Texas By Date 5b Interlocal Agreement(rev. 10/1/99) Page 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY EMPLOYER MEMBER: EMPLOYER MEMBER BENEFITS COORDINATOR Name Title Mailing Address Street Address (if different from above) City/State/Zip Phone Fax E-mail 5- � Interlocal Agreement(rev. 10/1/99) Page 5 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 24, 2000 • TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Shelli Siemer, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-35, Appointing Curtis Powell and Dave Visney to the SPIN Standing Committee as co-representatives for SPIN Neighborhood #15. Action Requested: City Council appointment of Curtis Powell and Dave Visney to the SPIN Standing Committee as the SPIN #15 co-representatives to fill an unexpired term. Background Information: The SPIN Representative position in SPIN #15 became vacant when Wayne and June Haney resigned in January. The process for appointing the SPIN Standing Committee members allows for the citizens to select a SPIN representative and the City Council then appoints the individual selected by a particular SPIN neighborhood. Residents of the SPIN #15 area were informed of the vacancy and a vacancy meeting was held on March 23 to select a new SPIN Representative. The only person attending the meeting was Mr Powell, who indicated he and neighbor Dave Visney would like to work together to represent SPIN 15. Both Mr. Powell and Mr. Visney attended the SPIN orientation in January because they had an interest in volunteering as the SPIN15 representative. The City Council SPIN has appointed co-representatives in the past. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Mr. Powell was the only person who attended the March 23 vacancy meeting for SPIN 15. Letter were mailed to all SPIN 15 residents Legal Review: Not Applicable. Alternatives: Not Applicable. Ily Campbell, City Manager arch 24, 2000 Page 2 "' Supporting Documents: Resolution. Staff Recommendation: Please place this item on the April 4, 2000 City Council Agenda. City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 00-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A SPIN 15 NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE TO THE SPIN STANDING COMMITTEE FOR THE SOUTHLAKE PROGRAM FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS (SPIN) TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, established the Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN) to provide a more available form of citizen participation in the affairs of the City; and, WHEREAS, the mission statement of SPIN is to provide a forum which fosters open and timely communication between the citizens of Southlake and City Government regarding programs, activities and issues that affect the quality of life in the community; and, WHEREAS, under Ordinance 598, the City Council created the SPIN Standing Committee to represent each of the designated SPIN neighborhoods with residents from each SPIN area selecting a representative; and WHEREAS, The City Council officially name the SPIN Standing Committee members through a resolution after the SPIN area has held a meeting to select a representative; now THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1: That the position of the SPIN 15 representative, previously held by Wayne and June Haney, has been vacated and the following individuals are hereby appointed as neighborhood co-representative for the term specified: Neighborhood#15 Curtis Powell &Dave Visney Term Expires: December,2001 Section 2: This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. SC-- Resolution No.00-35 Page 2 EXECUTED this day of 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary , City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, extension 814 Subject: Resolution No. 00-36 - Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2 -.Sanitary Sewer Easement Abandonment Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 00-36, authorizing the abandonment of a sanitary sewer easement in Lots 19, 20, 21 and 23, Block 64, Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2, and authorizing the Mayor to execute a quitclaim deed. Background Information: On November 4, 1999, the' final plat for Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2 was approved. Eagle Bend Estates Phase 2 is a residential subdivision in Timarron in the southern part of the City. When Dominion Addition was developed, a sanitary sewer line was constructed across the vacant property that is now being developed as Eagle Bend Estates, Phase 2. To eliminate the existing sanitary sewer line from crossing through the middle of the new platted residential lots, the developer of Eagle Bend Estates, Phase 2, plans to realign the existing sanitary sewer line out of the buildable area of the lots. The final plat includes the necessary sanitary sewer easement. The developer's agreement for Eagle Bend Estates Phase 2 was approved by Council'on January 18, 2000. Construction has progressed to the point that the new re-aligned sewer line has been installed and is now in service. The old section of sewer line has been filled with concrete and the easement covering that section is no longer needed by the City. Financial Considerations: None. - Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. 5F-1 Legal Review: None. Alternatives: Approve it or disapprove it. Supporting Documents: Resolution 00-36 Quitclaim Deed Exhibit Staff Recommendation: Please place on City Council Agenda for April 4, 2000 for Council consideration and approval. Charlie J. Thom, City Engineer " r 5F-2 _ f RESOLUTION NO. 00-36 A RESOLUTION VACATING AND ABANDONING A SANITARY SEWER • EASEMENT IN LOTS 19,20,21, and 23, BLOCK 64, EAGLE BEND ESTATES, PHASE 2, IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, INTEREST OR CONTROL OF SAID SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant of Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, a sanitary sewer easement has been previously dedicated to the City of Southlake by the owner of Lots 19,20,21 and 23, Block 64, of the Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2, to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that the sanitary sewer easement located in Lots 19,20, 21 and 23, Block 64, of Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2, (the "sanitary sewer easement") is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. Said sanitary sewer easement is more specifically described on the attached exhibits: EXHIBIT A: Legal Description EXHIBIT B: Graphic Depiction- WHEREAS, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said sanitary sewer easement, the City desires to execute a Quitclaim Deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said easement to the owner or owners of Lots 19, 20, 21 and 23, Block 64, Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The sanitary sewer easement, as described herein, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would • be better served by its vacation and abandonment. Accordingly the above described sanitary sewer easement located on 5F-3 • 'A. 7. EXHIBIT A EASEMENT ABANDONMENT BEING A PORTION OF A 15'WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 11558,PAGE 677 DEED RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.), SITUATED IN THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 1037, IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS AND BEING LOCATED ACROSS THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO SOUTHLAKE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, LTD,RECORDED IN VOLUME 14152,PAGE 409 D.RT.C.T. THE PORTION OF SAID EASEMENT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1, TIMARRON GOLF COURSE AS RECORDED IN CABINET A,SLIDE 2985-2986 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (P.R.T.C.T.)AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT, SAID POINT BEING N 01°07'22" E,A DISTANCE OF 137.71 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EASEMENT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT,THE FOLLOWING FOUR(4)COURSES AND DISTANCES: N 01°07'22" E,A DISTANCE OF 10.59 FEET TO A POINT; • N 55°58'39"W,A DISTANCE OF 256.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; N 55°58'39"W,A DISTANCE OF 181.36 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 89°54'34" W,A DISTANCE OF 327.24 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE N 27°55'11"W, OVER AND ACROSS SAID EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF 16.96 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT, THE FOLLOWING TWO(2)COURSES AND DISTANCES: N 89°54'34" E,A DISTANCE OF 339.76 FEET TO A POINT FOR.CORNER; S 55°58'39"E,A DISTANCE OF 207.54 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 89°13'06"W,OVER AND ACROSS SAID EASEMENT,A DISTANCE OF 26.28 FEET THE POINT OF BEGINNING,ANt ONTAINING 0.182 ACRES OF LAND,MORE OR LESS. H:VOB\TIMARRON\99211801\SDATA\118EX004.FNS )eO '' 11<('.% PAGE1 OF 2 e ..s........,...y........... 4 GARY S.VEDRO :4 44934 P~ 5F-4 OSUE �r,cp" I 1 G " I ,y ^—`. 1 / N 27'55'1 1 " W // 16.96' s, SCALE: 1 ' = 100' S 2 ,. �cPu LINE BEARING DISTANCE a-, aoc , `' �, �1 L1 NO1'07'22"E 10.59' c,►`v, ?s',? tP L2 N55'58'39"W 256.68' 1,3 1 LA - P'. P* A7= •\h F \lk, 0.182 ACRES ,-;2 '\� ; 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT %o_ ?��`';� VOL. 11558, PG. 677 -cpsoa. _ _ D..R.T.C.T. 2 4\3t C�1 03 - ifco aco. _ BLOCK 1 °"us. t 1.77 LOT 1 POB ys TIMARRON k‘,� GOLF COURSE " 0 CAB. A, SLIDE 2985-2986' P.R.T.C.T. z S 89'13'06" W BLOCK 3 z, N I 26.28' LOT 1R Ln .....1I TIMARRON / GOLF COURSE / CAB. A, SLIDE 4576-4577 / \ P.R.T.C.T. N46'42'32"W I 67.05' I ::z :°: .1/ S. e...----.............. THE BEARING BASE IS THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME11558, PAGE 677, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. DATE: 12/02/99 EXHIBIT "8" SHEET SCALE: 1DD' EASEMENT ABANDONMENT CZ Carter::Burgess Consultants in Planning, Engineering.kchitecture, OUT OF THE Construction Management and Related'Services DRAWN BY: R. BEECHAM HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABST NO. 1037 CARTER & BURGESS. INC.. 2 OF 2 IN THE 71. ?� CHECKED BY: G. VEDRO CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (214)15350145 H:\JOB\TIMARRON\9921180,1\GRA\118EX001.DWG 5F-5 ' • Lots 19, 20, 21 and 23, Block 64, Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2 to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, is hereby vacated and abandoned as public property and such area shall revert in fee simple to the owner of Lots 19,20, 21 and 23, Block 64, of Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2. Section 2. The Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title, ownership or control of the sanitary sewer easement on the behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. A copy of said quitclaim deed shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas by the office of the City Secretary. Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED on this day of , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary Approved as to form and legality: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective: 5F-6 QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT That the City Council of the City of Southlake, County of Tarrant, State of Texas, after careful study and consideration, has determined that a certain utility easement located in Lots 19,20,21 and 23, Block 64, Eagle Bend Estates Addition, Phase 2, hereinafter specifically described, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. For and in consideration of the above findings and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Southlake does hereby bargain, sell, release, vacate, abandon and forever quitclaim unto the owner any and all of its heirs, legal representatives or assigns, all of its right, title, and interest in and to the following described real property situated in Tarrant.County, Texas, to wit: See Exhibit"A": Legal Description See Exhibit "B": Graphic Depiction TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of its right, title and interest in and to the above described sanitary sewer easement unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs, legal representatives or assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid sanitary sewer easement premises or appurtenances or any part thereof. Executed this the day of , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Mayor 5F-7 EXHIBIT A EASEMENT ABANDONMENT BEING A PORTION OF A 15' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 11558,PAGE 677 DEED RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.), SITUATED IN THE HALL MEDLIN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 1037, IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS AND BEING LOCATED ACROSS THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO SOUTHLAKE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, LTD,RECORDED IN VOLUME 14152,PAGE 409 D.R.T.C.T. THE PORTION OF SAID EASEMENT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1, 11MARRON GOLF COURSE AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2985-2986 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS(P.R.T.C.T.)AND THE SOUTHERLY . _ LINE OF SAID EASEMENT,SAID POINT BEING N 01°07'22"E,A DISTANCE OF 137.71 • FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EASEMENT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT,THE FOLLOWING . FOUR(4)COURSES AND DISTANCES: N 01°07'22" E,A DISTANCE OF 10.59 FEET TO A POINT; • - N 55°58'39"W,A DISTANCE OF 256.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; N 55°58'39" W,A DISTANCE OF 181.36 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; • S 89°54'34" W,A DISTANCE OF 327.24 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE N 27°55'11"W,OVER AND ACROSS SAID EASEMENT,A DISTANCE OF 16.96 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT,THE FOLLOWING TWO(2)COURSES AND DISTANCES: N 89°54'34" E,A DISTANCE OF 339.76 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; S 55°58'39" E,A DISTANCE OF 207.54 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 89°13'06"W,OVER AND ACROSS SAID EASEMENT,A DISTANCE OF 26.28 • FEET THE POINT OF BEGINNING,AN KONTAINING 0.182 ACRES OF LAND,MORE OR LESS. iI or • F ,,� q�,,ys H:VOB\TIMARRON\99211801\SDATA\118EX004.FNS r�Q' { . PAGE 1 OF 2 .} ..:.:.....:..,.r.,.,...::_,. GARY S. VE,DRO dek • I�944 J34o��;,q,. • 5F-8 ,!le:6'•S''U R.•►�o t 00 / / N 27'55'11 " W // 16.96' ';'•: SCALE: 1' = 100' cP 0a0 t pti'`,. cP LINE BEARING DISTANCE Vs`A-. cp '14'' te ° L1 N01'07'22"E 10.59' c' '; •�U; L2 N55'58'39"W 256.68' ` a' 0.182 ACRES �., ' ,; 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ' �; \�� VOL. 11558, PG. 677 _ i D.R.T.C.T. 1 Q,4 CA f Li CAI'—• cn k:,,,\' N,A) (17 'CO ;,:,. .v cn cp LA 'SLP Z • ` A c BLOCK 1 °'LP. rn LOT 1 POB GOLFMCOURSE "\, CAB. A, SLIDE 2985-2986 P.R.T.C.T. • S 89']3'06" W BLOCK 3 A N/ 26.28' LOT 1 R NW J I TIMARRON .. I / GOLF COURSE • I CAB. A, SLIDE 4576-4577 I ` P.R.T.C.T. N46'42'32'W / L 67.05' "N733 599 WI /:z1 :; / / re'...../..........„ • THE BEARING BASE IS THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME11558, PAGE 677, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. DATE: 12/02/99 E X H I B I T "1 " SHEET SCALE: 100' EASEMENT ABANDONMENT Cal Carter::Burgess Consultonts in Planning, Engineering. Architecture, OUT OF THE DRAWN BY R BEECHAM Construction Management and Related Services HALL MEDLIN SURVEY, ABST NO. 1037 CARTER & BURGESS, INC., 2 OF 2 IN THE 7 2C Ells3ROOK ME. ?�' dun,12 71247-41161. CHECKED Br: C. VEDRO CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (714)$11`019 H:\JOB\TIMARRON\99211 .1\GRA\118EX001.DWG ` 8D 5F-9 , • STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared RICK STACY, Mayor of the City of Southlake, known to me to be the person whose name in subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. - GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of , 2000. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission expires: Return to: City Secretary City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 5F-10 „ k . Tr . N II taA■taI AWL/ • f . ”,05.7 , n WAX COO LIAM r I 02 FLT.LT. a I `\ Maa U\\ 1 11 1 1 ., , zo'o.E I I I ,i I fl -�----�111 \T `� a a � \ s 11Ji ` ' ,� ... ,� r_'t= �..u.. , • \ F'. • '�� 1 ,_f'r FL 1 TIDQ u / m++*.0 1 R /��\ V.F11111r % t j .LOC NV tN L9® a \.... / � AI � 1 < AAA \ 12 ri . I • 70. `� ILI 3 c • CAL A.aO orts-a/ P I • w _ 1, �1`r....rar,MtMM T stir. ,E LCosiammi: • • / 1f' A �i► is W . II >� n 1 ii �T Q `/ ft 11 T■ ._ • 5. L , II tux- II II a I a II a 11 a a -*/ )�� 7�� _ _ 17 \ y t . __�_` II . a II Ta I -'I-- I --I II .4\ i/�le'LLE /_ /'R? \ ` �,�"J7�. :, �'.. j,1 JI :�.zL�.->—I 4 o'.c. r.... ittrOME... i /. + II Ilr II II I I _ , 104,. ,. 7.1432.1. ,12 ' , I LL�ai Iul ' 11 r ii�ieL I T I 7 I 1 •:.•, {7 ii ii it I b� .T.�. tt WM \ " - '. i,• e1 c \1BM.. u• I 1rMO "'anew■mores ..— ---� —_�:_ _• ram_ -rMi '- e.10 1. \ ' Maw w M�' >� { R• .. r _ a' - "� .,fr \\ `'O �' , � .RI. uOTo .��T r6, ;Y\'04.•`e w. S \�` - r .� Fuca r V �..L. 10 ,t13.3 �t \, /r ` ,N,.a ,�a. IL /, :�...pN.�,�., ��'p OCT 151999 IBM" \^ 111% y W. TLC aY ..... '��� /// roan ` /►/��■■��r� ea..LME 1711 ..` \ =NAL N O L F1TiT• /�- ...... �/ •.nmMa :`Y `.m. A REVIEW i Wi�.A■ . i \ / ue:.OF 01•00•S Iv a 10"1 /%/\'r PLIZINIAM - am.a = FINAL PLAT o CC �\ /.a,a LOLL I _ TiiARRON ADDITION ' \ / �LO.• f �iOmr t1 ,••� LAY \ q J✓' EAGLE �E�TATES 1 I �� \ ``�� 1 -- — .t-�—a�-s •C.� MORM CM ( BIT OF nc z=--- . TIC ABSTRACTnt Hawn Tr SALLY. -- S. F\ k ME IL CMOPA7N9 1 7.ABSTRACT Pill 437 11 CITY Or SOIITILA .VIVANT COUNTY.TEXAS • 3. 03 37 MC LAMP•70.Ma $A 3576E ACRES/37 LOTS M.•A■wok Loft ma CTG Pi 4 4 taw 1 ono ON A 4r M.m ONO Loot•■OW E.LOB lam '' a.mean oa.a.�■:.�m'R.c.A=.11k7 ww'N'.MLti'..oeim 01 41 3 COMMON GREENS L :..e�5 s.g.�ba oarea if •••M•�Maim•• L ."c.ar..t,..M VIM.....Ta.MOWS•aa..m..r ar BIN.... I� wNC yxlcL soJDL3. TL�wnAL rwaovnrs tm > •t.lw.e..e IMP►BIM.L MONK EC AIL 9AINLAIBI OM ROOM Msa Leo AT■m..•M ammo N■me a LUNT Ow ROI NMI CORM a a1 OTT eE0@TAO1 9111E 130 l� .MmLW w.M MVR..M IMAM Pnmm.M.Mr.••v CMMNI SOIITIOANE. t••c VOL T OW A COMM MI Nov •■OW NIL m Rr e+To<Rsoi I:m i■is w rr■Sr l T3a" ..m"O (eft)m-Coo • cos ���Q L K1®■L•AA��vM`iI R..1CT-Ifa Mi.=a MI IMMO. ENCINCER ■ N II MMauMs M a a MOM tl /9JRIETORalg M"^� ••• ■••••••MO® L pD Tt!MMl 1p bmwer.aAup.IMI 1.00•�M,YL,M Y .w..YYiir. • M •� Ir.a NUM urn IMMO NMI OWN ,, I. L■M.Mrt MM..V Mm,YYT 0 row r m.np,iF ie .6.. n �I1��1r����� 1pI.�/O.lr.1 EIMFFVw r��. MaMM I t,.maf.was AMO MM R.l M. ..OR.O Qir 1145 PLAT NW)N CABINET ,g10E DATE AUGUST 1999 yet 1 7 7 .CAL N3 la 33-033 r.r...•1•.1..•... r 2,51 61 H,y '` _ -c8.7 0 'FLODCFaN do:.`h u 1 TC 1� '� P- 1: t ' I C.GCC'NA7 -: ,05 3 • c 1 s _ t_14 N a1 I N 1'rp5�o ','z'1\o n rt•= 00 N 89'34'15" E 4� g - w u 1 MIN F16 588.i \ \"--\ % ' 1 12'7g 2 60.00 20®-----• -`--- 1 --1- j -D-- -_158.21 , fl c# z+,+61 eF .1 1Y� \ 24.55 \\ TIMARRON ADDITION \ 1O'u CRESCENT ROYALE w 6 0 \ • BLOCK 63 I II &L 3 - `i \ %-5•Pj .6 sf rna \ or rn o t\ I I PHASE 2 1tS' zG•. 3 s �0 11 w .ICE• 0`L'�'Ss�b a ` i°�A z 19 bc`v 20 ;� aN N \ 30 I I CAB. A, SLIDE 4441 7 N 24,9:9 SF b 1• _f 3a,141 SF p N t0 --vhV^MIN FF= 592.2� S 2, \ /)u 1 8 / A MIN FF= 588.7 Z 31,668 5F v N N NA N 29 t\ I I P.R.T.C.T. 0 \PLO 17 , :C,G, ( cP v N 31,482 SF 22 m v' 1i& \\\ I I 31 32 ;'i 33 G7 ry \ 3. \ 21.797 SF jz - Vl r,� �, r \1 I _I I_ I I 15_B.L_I 41'4' \ \\?MIN FF>•588.6^,�1�35.659 5F\ \ N a0.494 5F a�J / -- -- -- ' �yg�0 12 \ \ \C ryba^+•\\ \ �--104.57---98.0716.83 rn m`r� C�, 37,364 SF \\ �`SJ� '.� `' \\\ /4�'•' C10 5'8C o-A g"'•`; VILLA CRO N.P ---1 _ - AGLE BEND �>77` 10'UEtt -- .e. \ 23 0D 10' MBE \ 78-- ,v \• C ` 5JBEN 7 _I 10.66 C.G. Co, „ 5' 25r I I 1E • -�--- II • II II a q �� 9 1- J\\ s�9g C�1� .486 SF `� C1 1 i 5�3- 7g l i,492 SF m- - J R. .w. 1�'m7 I °aN \ a �' 19 N '6 L12 �7�� - -- m I i CO. . I I 6 I 5 I I • ti 13 43. = 0 'Y----1�c \ C.G. p�?7,6j c� �� 27 ��, I I I I I I a 18.88 •85.Op ? • \ 10'UE-!'I 'VILLA 11 I B 11 J 39.073 SF �' S \ a+\\, \48.49 E C 10 .559; 1 22 v j$ C!I^- II r, 1 CROSSING I I I 1 �, irll P a 18 \ N a 446\15. U.E. o MAKE 10' LIE C.G. �� 26 L V N 89'34'15 y • T`,,b. 'O p+ m N 24,309 SF \ \ir+°' \\ VOL. 11558, PG. 677 MOTH°6 S 7 10,866 SF • GC3 , S MIN FF-s9zs \ o, D.R.T.C.T. J 436 "grip' CO • 14 I ps. \ ¢ \ TO BE ABANDONED\_ L47 217918 E `�' 77 rd t �' �T• 33,577 SF p .h N 8426'37' E\ ��:"•` -::: --Neb a.47 �-lc 7`3 G.•w 174.1s 83.00 If •. .1 < .:._. i_i Fii_ i_i:.::_iiir.:::.eii ii�i_eir'riF_::. ....- o. �6 c.4.,S 4 - t 69.56 16.69 �, \U1 y o `h `ZT73 1 �y T _ q \ L ._ w c° J 08.21 L13 7S ?��`S0 cA I ( U I�: \ °' p\w, 20 O AS P. h? '.3* s� •�S+ {� q w n w s6.13z SF ,N,, 21 ;. •... OE n'A ti C �7 .q y b$ 1 R. \ o\a MIN FT=see:a o cn m ti`� as.s0 !y a y5 \ // O 56.fi65 5F \ ' \ 2S3_ AZ M 75 H vi \ \ p m MIN FF=587.7 23 / I '� ti '1Z, -80.25 17 0\ �;, tJo ` `,'''.:::.. zs.ns 5F o, 25 BL 27.862 5F 90.37 S 35,739 SF m\ t2: L29�- m �1 U2 ;};.. MIN FF 587.5 7 p 25FF 5F 15' U.E. i is MIN FF a 588.0 +O v - --� \ N fp MIN F24 587. 3 I S @ MIN FF.587.9 4. O: g -� y h MIN FT-588.0 ��O. i In 136.14 2a96` 26.47� 1.T4 vry^MIN FF= 587.3 W 1 -15' D.E. N. 11* ,Dr 33642 SF e3 ,..25 ' 6 \ 1 = - o ---1335 q 31,29+ SF r. BLOCK 64 ' a, 15' a E. s 70.i - IV o ss r° 16 u4; m 20.95 4..0o S8$'38'35"W 79. o • - - p -t �'T° t� �ry s 66.�0 32 5 7V4O'8� W 162.56 N66.3j��. - /1'v'u=�vz 2.:MIN FF =587.1. 6.ini _' -1%'� pE 74.29 = 584 26'37 W 210. 4? 33+ 3?v,� H ---,AAA, l 26 , / ,tN IL • / , V p k J 30,190 SF , m ���./ ,v�tPg���V1' �5 '�77.15� UMITS O wo95 ��\s /• Z RiagLEWrprxDez ��`` _, L8 <j `.1/ �Ir09 & FLOODPLAIN 147 BLOCK 64 Ill ,f S6�`145 I I N 74'OO S' 03 i `' I // IY 4, 12� m -- / TIMARRON VOL. 11558, PG. 677 I� / 31 1j •S7 Z D.R.T.C.T. I / / i • GOLF COURSE CD \ CAB. A, SLIDE 2985-2986 �- / i \ • , . P.R.T.C.T. /�- (n DRAINAGE EASEMENT ' APPROXIMt / / ` LIMITS OF FLO D •\/ APPROXIMATE BLOTKII / \75' U.E. & FLOODPL \ LIMITS & FLOODPLAIN AY m >\ Ci7 DRAINAGE C/) \\ % c?YyOA, / BLC \ / Op C SOGT ( LC \\\ `70L.300086. PGM n 93 / / O(�L�4�F 20' S.S. ESMT. (� \ 'ivL. 7727. PC. 376 D.R.T C.T. e. m I D.R.T.C.T. \ CF \ I APPROX. LOC. _ -- � _ J/-- BIG BEAR City of Southlake, Texas • MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Shawn Poe, Senior Civil Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 775, 2" Reading, Abandonment and quitclaim of a portion of South Kimball Avenue right-of-way at the intersection of Crooked Lane Action Requested: Staff requests Council to approve Ordinance No. 775, 2nd Reading, which is for the abandonment and quitclaim of a portion of South Kimball Avenue right-of-way at the intersection of Crooked Lane. Background Information: The construction plans for S. Kimball from Crooked Lane to the Heritage Business Park are being developed. The right-of-way for this section of S. Kimball was dedicated by plat in 1974. Following the survey for the design of S. Kimball, it was discovered that the portion of right-of-way for S. Kimball on the south side of Crooked Lane was offset"and not aligned with the existing right-of-way of S. Kimball north of Crooked Lane. Therefore, additional right-of-way for S. Kimball was required on the south side of Crooked Ln. to align the roadway at the intersection. The property owner(Mr. James Lunsford) on either side of the existing S. Kimball right-of-way- south of Crooked Ln. has dedicated the required right-of-way to align the roadway. Exhibit 1 shows the amount dedicated by the property owner. Since the roadway has been shifted to the east, south of Crooked Ln.,.there is a portion of the right-of-way that was dedicated by the original plat that is no longer needed.. Exhibit 2 shows the amount of right-of-way not required to construct S. Kimball south of Crooked Ln. This portion can be abandoned and quitclaimed to the property owner in consideration for the additional right-of-way he dedicated to align the intersection. The two, platted tracts on either side of the Kimball right-of-way affected by the proposed abandonment and additional right-of-way dedication will have to submit a plat revision to the City,prior to development. Council approved the first reading of the ordinance at the March 21, 2000 City Council Meeting. Financial Considerations: None. 7A- 1 City of Southlake, Texas Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: The City attorneys reviewed and approved Ordinance No. 775. Alternatives: • None. Supporting Documents: Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Ordinance No. 775 Quitclaim Deed Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve Ordinance No. 775, 2nd Reading, which is for the abandonment and quitclaim of a portion of South Kimball Avenue right-of-way at the intersection of Crooked Lane. Please place this item on the April 4, 2000 Regular City Council Agenda for review and consideration. SEP/sep 7A-2 j PROPERTY DESCRIBED i N`' j •• • I I • AREA = 2.190 sq. ft. , j 0.050 acres j j I I. F�l7utE i I j ll'1'U.R ALP'. RE61`D. Kt.0.1'IN. j .jr IIZt jN sup RVE I �•w•Rp�� Ro• I i '..I Y t j I •.. •.''� F�EgMp.55a9 1 5 j •�• •,• p pC? 1 .AB k Ne , —•• �F•• CROOKED LANE P'MONUMENT iili\ . i ii9. t f.._.._.._.._.._ N86.45'00"E POB .._.._.._ v 1 29.23 S86 45;00;'li' 34 _25_ f,-- W j•,• L =216.10 „ - ‘ i:: .1 S j ._ ,_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ M I A =11.59 52 � -: � W i ( R = 1032.00' 1 y T =108.45 :.. , i j CO =215.71' tV, ' , �``I I uR/EY CARROLLTRACT 1B INDEPENDENT ►"'' i LC =215.71' . 22.04ft MCD0T pN0.1 1 VOL. 13014. P.540 Ees Os s 5 1. ,•72.61•ft C•B• Rp .�.._r.. GRU®0 ACt PACE A .145.21ft ABS i i i 5 tR 96• t i • vp1.• 388,t•c• �) ,�� of r i 1p.' l'tiott/tl. I 4,ss tP i o SO No goo E. y'�°�*'� 4.4' t SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION R*W pEDICAT p 1611. 11.M11.11 IP -__ �....• I.Eddie L.Cheatham of CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES,a Registered Professional - EOOIE L.CHEATHAI►1 Land Surveyor of the State of Texas.do hereby declare that the calculations. Note:ALL BEARINGS BASED ON THE NORTH t IN FEET ) _ Z346 . graphic depiction and legal descriptions of this survey were properly prepared LIVE OF THE GREEN MEADOW SUBDIVISION 1 inch - 100 ft. c1ho/Iss`o?t0Q- under my eondeupervbton from on actudrurv.y made on the ground. VOL.388-96,P.45 (D.R.T.C.T.J• CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES SURV eG/�/Mw.. VT,•'Z"l "1dot 1001 ARLNGTON.�MICAS 7IatVD SUITE 100 Registered Professional Land Surveyor No.2346 tern 54a•oese Metro t017)2e5•e83e ,.... '4444 • • j PROPERTY DESCRIBEQ I j IW ' I I . AREA = 1 .968 sq. ft. I I Z I I I 0.045 acres Li I EY j I ! SURL 098 i i I Q MpIN�p• i I i i t -.1 .. J G•STRpCt l I •'./ �: I Oµ� STRACt ND• j 111.1.L.. � A 98.36'53" 1 '.�••�• .I pB I I • R 23.78ft i ji' ',. • �• j • CD =N37524'42"E I -•�''��• !• 1 LC =36.05ft �.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. L:�.. cotj MONUMENT • CROOKED LANE �OB ses_�5•ooM zs-e•�sT:o ; _: ►'r+ yv I • .._.._.._.._•-••—.._.._.._..�;1 I s,; IPsz soo•15'oo"w t;� °w I : _.:_.._. _.._.:_:._:._.. A j L =198.71ft ° 75.16' M ION �" _.._.'_" �»»� o =10•12'07" L I �REBptV t 1 eE Au y R = 1116.00ft VB AG CIA 5 1 1c t,1 ND j LC 198445ft W j 7I V0�' (P•6' I TRACT 1B j I �. CARROLL INDEPENDENT j I �! ' _11 � =1556537t j SCHOOL DISTRICT .. _.._.._.._.._.._.._T.: 11 R = 4438.00ft j y VOL. 13014, P.540 CD_=50'43'19'E jo 5�0i3 j j LC =150.55ft $ ' i OF r QD0 .0 �v.` %s a e+� I R� I b .54: IPS C'40,IRA i 0 00 0o mo Co ! * • 0 $URYEY_O S CERTIFICATION 6110 !!!IIIIMMEMMII »»»»».«. • I.Eddie L.Cheatham of CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES.a Registered Professional EDDIE L.CHEATHAM Land Surveyor of the State of Texas.do hereby declare that the calculations. Note:ALL BEARINGS BASED ON THE NORTH (II FEET ) 4 2346 •• . graphic depktion and Iegal descriptions of this survey were properly prepared LINE.OF THE e op =sto ion under my personal supervision from an actual survey made on the ground. VOL.388 96,P.45 fD.R.�C T.)SUBDIVISION 1 inch - 100 it. CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES sum, -= \- A.-•a Q • WWOI E LAWR BLVD SURE 200 Ai OM 7 Registered Professional Land Surveyor No.234ti tam 154e-0ese Moto canna-we ORDINANCE NO. 775 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING A RIGHT OF WAY FOR SOUTH KIMBALL AVENUE IN A PORTION OF TRACT 1 OF THE GREEN MEADOW SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP INTEREST AND CONTROL OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, a right of way has been previously dedicated to the City of Southlake by the owner of Tract 1 of the Green Meadow Subdivision to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that the right-of-way located in the portion of Tract 1 of the Green Meadow Subdivision is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding public benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment; WHEREAS, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said right-of-way, the City desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said right-of-way to the owner of the abutting property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: 7A-5 SECTION 1. The right-of-way in the portion of Tract 1 of the Green,Meadow Subdivision to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, more specifically shown in Exhibit "A" and described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. Accordingly, the above described right-of- way is hereby vacated and abandoned as public property and shall revert in fee simple to the owner of Tract 1 of the Green Meadow Subdivision. SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the right-of-way, on behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. SECTION 3. A copy of said quitclaim deed shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas by the office of the City Secretary. SECTION 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the city council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, 7A-6 r such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY , APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney 7A-7 , .",,,,,,,, X,H I BJT "A" , ! PROPERTY DESCRIBED ! j Li I - I : AREA = 1 .968 sq. ft. I • 2t : j I I I 0.045 acres j > IJRVr-8 I I S %o ' i AP t40• I i .). I 1 I G.II. ACc I I ,4.•'- '� BST I l i• •... j SUN • j •�¢ f1 A i i' ..••�' j EM�N.S5 a j j I� i .�,-' �. .. j p F Aft Na • j be 11 L =40.92ft „ I �,.% i I JONABS�R C j 14 ii T 27365ftt I ��_ .�•• j 1 i to j 1 CD =N37.24'42"E I �. • _.._.._.._..._..r...l• 1 LC=36:05ft .._.. • J,.�• PM' „ — CORD'MONUMENT .._.._111 .._.._..—CROOKED LANE _ Oo2 .IRF 586�45'a0'M258,15':.0• j ,._.._.._..._.._.LANE_ ._.._.._.._..-.;` s,� trs ' j�,S .15'00"W f,OQtwj L`.._::_ _.._.._..___ ._........::_::_... j L =198.71ft" ' L- --1J � 75.1 . O I.10ft : GgU9,fa�,96 Pp6E T =99.62ft • j CD =N6.47'41" I V0�' tP•8't l TRACT INDEPENDENT j LC =188.45ft SCHOOL DISTRICT jj f—L =150.56ft • A =1.5637" j VOL. 13014. P.540 II 1 R = 4438.00ft R y _.._.._.._.._.._.._r T =75.29ft I U V CD =S0.43'19"E S y3 I • j LC =150.55ft IAGDOT' 0 y 0 �A of s�s re I i ( b :s% l PS C•.S 1/1 j o 00 wo too AB i y e4r * �e TN SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION IIIMMO!!!6MMOMMENJ ...ppp.ppp I.Eddie L Cheatham of CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES.a Registered Professional =- EDDIE L.CHEATHAM Land Surveyor of the State of Texas.do hereby declare that the calculations. Note:ALL BEARINGS BASED ON THE NORTH C N FEET ) p ....pq...pp. + 2348 �� graphic depiction and Iegddaaiptlons of this survey were properly prepared LINE OF THE GREEN MEADOW SUBDIVISION 1 inch • 100 ft. ('ao�.Es��a�04. under my personalsupervlalon from an actualsurvey made on the ground. VOL.388-96,P.45 (D.R.T.C.T.1 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES SURV �� \•‘,445%, D ftb 1 E.LA B BLV SEE 200 AS MOD Registered ProfeselondLand Surveyor No.2348 (afl)548-0690 bistro (8m255-583e Exhibit'B' Being a 0.045 acre tract of land in the C.B.McDonald Survey,Abstract No. 1013,City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas,and being a portion of Green Meadow Subdivision,Tract 1,as recorded in Volume 388-96,Page 45(P.R.T.C.T.)and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a concrete monument found,said point being the northeast corner of said Green Meadow Subdivision,Tract 1. THENCE S 86°45'00"W,for a distance of 258.15 feet to a''A"iron pin found for a corner, said point being the northwest property corner of said Tract 1 and in the south right-of-way line of Crooked Lane,said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 00° 15'00"W,for a distance of 75.16 feet to a point,said point being the beginning of a curve to the left,having a radius of 4,438.00 feet and a chord bearing of S 0°43'19"E; THENCE continuing along said curve,for a distance of 150.56 feet to a 5/8"iron pin set for a corner,said point being the beginning of a curve to the left,having a radius of 1,116.00 feet and a chord bearing of N 06°47'41"W; THENCE continuing along said curve,for a distance of 198.71 feet to a 5/8"iron pin set for a corner,said point also being the beginning of a curve to the right,having a radius of 23.78 feet and a chord bearing of N 37°24'42"E; THENCE continuing along said curve,for a distance of 40.92 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,containing 0.045 acres of land,more or less. G:\001-2301230-LGL l 1.DOC January 13,2000 • 7A-9 QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That the City Council of the City of Southlake, County of Tarrant, State of Texas, after careful study and consideration, has determined that the right of way of a portion of South Kimball Avenue, located in a portion of Tract 1 of the Green Meadow Subdivision, located in the City of Southlake, hereinafter more specifically shown on Exhibit "A" and described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding public benefit, and the public would be better served and benefited by its vacation and abandonment. For and in consideration of the above findings and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Southlake ("Grantor") does hereby bargain, sell, release, vacate, abandon and forever quitclaim unto James F. Lunsford, Trustee ("Grantee"), any and all of their heirs, legal representatives or assigns, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the right of way described on Exhibit "A" in proportion to their abutting ownership. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the above described right of way unto the said Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs, legal representatives or assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid right of way, premises or appurtenances or any part thereof. EXECUTED this day of , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Mayor 7A-10 )cH I B,I T "A" I PROPERTY DESCRIBEQ ! ! Li 1 -I i i AREA = 1 .968 sq. ft. I ! Z ! i I 0.045 acres • j j 5 R40 i I U R9 • Q MpINNO. 1 • I I I:j D:S�RpCT i ...•.• I RVEY l i AR i i •�• I IEMAN. Syag I I co I I i �..�' .'... RE NO 1.17; 'I l ! •�� ! J NNR Ai Ft ! I =98.36f53" I i i'�• .�'�. I 0 p S I ' ! • R = 0.92ftt i ii •.�' •.-• ! CD =N37.24'42"E I �••�''�.. .�' l T 27.65ft --.._.i 1L. LC 36.05ft j• .._.--••— CROOKED LANE •'P09 "se¢_+s'oo'w ase,�5'.::o r- . _-_:-'---_—_'_'--'__.._.._.__.. DI •�. .—.._.._..—.._.._.._.._..... N 'I 5, ip5 4 i�/S00.15'O0"W pN I •. j % L =198 71ft 75.16 N M£g I p i. — _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. i i R =10'12'Or t !• •'W GSU�R�ctl. PAGE 45 T =99.62ft • 388,96.C-T•1 CD =N6.47'41"W I. f V0�• lP•a.j I TRACT 1B j LC =198.45ft CARROLL" INDEPENDENT ! :jj • iL =150.56ft I • SCHOOL DISTRICT I ii A =1°56'37" ' _.._.._.._.._.._.._rs i II 1 R = 4438.00ft ! Y VOL. 13014. P.540 i I CD_=SO'43'19"E !p SUN 3 i I LC =150.55ft ppNAO. OF r I McpC'( I 11111110!!!ilMOMMEMEJ y'e e1*��o+'►o 1 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION b :5'i IP5 C•A ST R o eo moo «a•«««..«««..«« I.Eddie L.Cheatham of CHEATHAM MD ASSOCIATES.a Registered Profeeslond EDDIE L.CHEATHAM Land Surveyor of the State of Texas.do hereby declare that the calculations. Note:ALL BEARINGS BASED ON THE NORTH (N FEET ) - •+ 2346 .► •• graphic depiction and le descriptions of this surveywe� legal erip properly prepared LINE OF THE GREEN MEADOW SUBDIVISION 1 inch - 100 ft. Ti;:'t. ( opts �o'r 4 under my psrsondsupervsion from an actud survey made on the ground. VOL.388-96,P.45 (D.R.T.C.T.1 `�` 44,' suRV A CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES \`%A,—O_ 1°atiiLro�crar. .VD T SUITE n200 • Registered Professional Land Surveyor No.2346 (M�•0696 w(ro (tm)�- Exhibit`B' Being a 0.045 acre tract of land in the C.B.McDonald Survey,Abstract No. 1013,City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas,and being a portion of Green Meadow Subdivision,Tract 1,as recorded in Volume 388-96,Page 45(P.R.T.C.T.)and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a concrete monument found,said point being the northeast corner of said Green Meadow Subdivision,Tract 1. THENCE S 86°45'00"W,for a distance of 258.15 feet to a'/2"iron pin found for a corner, said point being the northwest property corner of said Tract 1 and in the south right-of-way line of Crooked Lane,said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE. S 00° 15'00"W,for a distance of 75.16 feet to a point,said point being the beginning of a curve to the left,having a radius of 4,438.00 feet and a chord bearing of S 0°43' 19"E; THENCE continuing along said curve,for a distance of 150.56 feet to a 5/8"iron pin set for a corner,said point being the beginning of a curve to the left,having a radius of 1,116.00 feet and a chord bearing of N 06°47'41"W; THENCE continuing along said curve,for a distance of 198.71 feet to a 5/8"iron pin set for a corner,said point also being the beginning of a curve to the right,having a radius of 23.78 feet and a chord bearing of N 37°24'42"E; THENCE continuing along said curve,for a distance of 40.92 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,containing 0.045 acres of land,more or less. G:\001-2301230•LGL I I.DOC January 13,2000 7A-12 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT March 31, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 99-099 PROJECT: Ordinance No.480-335/Second Reading/Rezoning and Concept Plan-Lot 1R2-1,W.W.Hall No. 695 Addition (Crestwood Office) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Interim Planning Director, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning on property legally described as Lot 1R2, W. W. Hall No. 695 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4545, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 1, Block 9, Southlake Town Square, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 4892&4893,Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of the abandoned North Carroll Avenue right-of-way; and being approximately 1.982 acres. PURPOSE: To change zoning of the adjacent property to the east being added to the site. Concept Plan approval is required with a change to the requested zoning district. LOCATION: On the northwest corner of the intersection of North Carroll Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard (F. M. 1709). OWNERS: Greenway-Southlake Office Partners, L.P. and Cooper& Stebbins, L.P. APPLICANT: Greenway-Southlake Office Partners, L.P. CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2"Generalized Site Plan District with"0-1"Office District uses and "NR-PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential and Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: City of Southlake, Texas • Juergen Strunck, P.O. Box 92685, Southlake, TX in favor, "The zoning requested will bring Crestwood Office Park Phase II into the same zoning as Phase I. My wife and I accepted this zoning when first approached about the development of the property to the south of ours." See attached letter. (Received March 3, 2000.) • Frank L. Bliss, Executive Vice President, Cooper & Stebbins, 1256 Main Street, Suite 240, Southlake, TX in favor. See attached letter. (Received March 22, 2000.) P&Z ACTION: March 9, 2000; Approved (3-2) subject to Revised Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated March 3, 2000, approving Alternate B; waiving Items#1 (500' driveway spacing on Carroll Avenue) and #2 (bufferyard along the common property line); excluding banks with drive-through lanes and drive-through ATMs; stating that a portion of the tract has "S-P-2" zoning and they are adding a tract with "NR-PUD" zoning to it and went with an "S-P-2" zoning in order to match the districts; stating that they want an "S-P-2" type of zoning in order to exclude drive-through banks and allow a right- in/right-out driveway; and adding the condition of a deceleration lane and putting the money in escrow. COUNCIL ACTION: March 21, 2000; Approved (5-0) First Reading subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated March 3, 2000; subject to the actions taken by the Planning and Zoning Commission; accepting Alternate Plan 'B', deleting "Drive-thru Banks" as a permitted use; allowing driveway spacing along Carroll Avenue as proposed; allowing right-in/right-out drive on F.M. 1709 as shown; requiring appropriate dedication for a decel lane once the shoulder is gone subject to City Engineer's recommendation; waiving the 5'Type 'A' bufferyard along west; granting a variance for 2 parking spaces and requiring no parking forward of the 50'building line. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated March 31, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\99CASES\99-099ZC.doc • JUERGEN STRUNCK P.O. BOX 92685 SOUTHLAKE,TX 76092 February 29,2000 The Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake 1721 E.Southlake, Suite 100 Southlake,TX 76092 Dear Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, It is with regret that I will not be able to attend the Public Hearing on March 9 for the discussion of ZA99- 099. My attached-signed note indicates that I have no objections to the proposed zoning change. I understand and accept the need of Greenway-Southlake Office Partners,L. P. to have access to Carroll Avenue. In conversation with Mr. Pigg and Kirk I have indicated that my wife and I would not object to the proposed location of the driveway to Carroll Avenue. I do however, have concerns about alternate A of the concept plan.To my view the close proximity of the proposed Carroll Avenue access driveway to the intersection of Carroll and Southlake Blvd. makes a drive-thru-bank and its to be anticipated active traffic problematic. I know from my own experience of entering Carroll Avenue from my driveway that this corner is danger- ous and it should not get more so with the type of traffic a drive-thru-bank would create. I also feel that such a bank comes as close to resembling a retail space in terms of who will use its facility as one can imagine.An office park with offices like those of Phase I are certainly more desirable to us who live across the fence from them. Tim Kirk and his company have been helpful to us in solving the trash and lightening problems of the Phase I Office Park.I assume the Greenway-Southlake Office Partners will continue this consultation/ cooperation with Phase II of their development. Thank you for your attention to my stated concerns and for any help you can give us to make living in Southlake as desirable as it has been in the past. Please feel free to contact me at(817)481-3681 if I can be of any assistance. I will return from a work- shop in Georgia by March 12. Sincerely, n ; . uerge Strunck RED MAR 0 3 Z000 �8,3 • M9ar-v7.-00 OB:43A 329 174?- P_07 ` 03/21/00 11:35 FAx 8112510717 COUrER a SIEbbi t4. L•r. `�"�� • • • COOPER %X ai D1 NS co er&3eebias.LP.12se Mast Sweet Suite mu =whet,TtAn 7 Teiev$oae ail 'r5 e+i 0 Facsimile (all)2S1.a717 • March 21,2000 • COlisitil City of 5:,::''...h:.ce 1721 E.Southlehe Blvd,Suite 100 emelt:a a �eX 76097 • Re: Case NO_ZA-99-099-Renotning&Concept P1_n-L ot1R2,W W Ball No.695 Addinen Case No.ZA-99-100-Plat Revision-i,ot 1R2.1,WW Hall No.6s*Addition Case No.ZA-99-101•Prel'minary Plat-Lots)&2-Greenway Curnll Addition • Dear Members of the City Council: Cooper& Stebbins,L.P. ("CAS")is negotiating with Greenway-Southlake Mice Partners,L.P. and Greenway- Carroll Road Partners, L.P. (collectively, "Greenway") to exchange Lot 2 of Block 9 of South ake Town Square for newly proposed Lot 2 of the Gteenway - Carroll Addition. in conjunction with those negotiations, we have reviewed: (1)Cue Nos.: ZA-99-099 and ZA-99-100 submitted with respect to Crestwood Office Park(and the proposed incorporation of Lot 2 of Block 9 of Southiiake Town Square); and(2) Case No. ZA 99.101 submitted with row-et w pmposed Lot 2 of the Giveaway Carroll Addition. Subject to the successful :.0..plc ton of our ia.gntia i ns ivith keenway,we have co objection to Case Nos. ZA-99-099, ZA-99 100,and ZA-99-101. Co rep onion of the laud tans& to Give- away should be a condition to approval of 7e-99-094 n d ZA 99_1El0. It is our intention to address the road dedication_for the Mae s.=. .sion of State Sit(Case N . ZA-99.101)by submission of a revised Preliminary Nat for S.outhiake Town Squ e, Please owe that our acceptance of the State Street alignment as shown is subject to TxDOT)< written • agreement to gnat access from State Street to the proposed on-ramp to Hiaaiway 1114. We understand that Tx©OT has verbally agreed to grant access to the on-ramp from the driveway as shown, and will formally approve the access when const ictiots drawings for this section of the highway are completed. Thank you for your consideration of these matters. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the undersigned. • aeiuwiw m y, `ice s(7s) • Frank L.Bliss Executive Vice President • • REC'D MAR 2 2 2000 76eq . . . , City of Southlake, Texas Tract Map ZA99-099 --_( F-1 1-1 NN • (::- ,:.4.1....\,A_:: ' Li. : L l .: ..._. __ i . . 1 . . / -- — . i. --- --(--.-_— _____ ,BA\. •:: ::91. ..1: /' / r -.\ 11iroi -. s- .. E mummy .- 2 ] r - -• I-- - •..„ --- _ e_ „. .. // -- -1 ...J..* / --- - cd —\ / • - , --.-"' \• ...-[TI ' - P , I. 1 - F *1 liP9" _:.,c_r,Ts,),m, \,...it,iiikit_rol.\Niticthr__-_4_--.:/:::.--/—/,.... m .4)&._ 0--;:;,- \.,::,,,.\ .-j.-- -g_i.....i_Lis) _ ,''stri- • E___ ,....:-.\..:,: -..,:-:-\[ _,T7..iii.,.. . . 2s, • - --Esciiit--;:-.;. -\ •- \ ,s, .\- ..\111N,G .-B K/ - * • •.)---• ---.. _ _ .:-.. - - ,..._ 1-11A ..Akiriftqthli 01>tbi-cithb ..., — - 7,/_tr-s(0976 -1-_r ' '1E\ 'V -6. 11-ITIFITr ONTA1NS- 2000 0 2000 Feet ...... N \ ..t.,......_ W ' E ' S -18- • City of Southlake, Texas Surrounding Property Owners ZA99-099 4MEI 1 11111111 m sm 0 - MR* !ow I civicj A PROSPE • ira EMI wm �,,u j 3 -1\ \ — 11111111 Property Owners Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage 1. J. Strunck 1. "AG" 1. Medium Density Residential 1. 3.000 acres 2. Southlake Venture West 2. "NR-PUD"2. Mixed Use 2. 5.601 acres 3. Southlake Venture West 3. "NR-PUD" 3. Mixed Use 3. 5.461 acres 4. South Carroll/1709 Ltd. 4. "S-P-2" 4. Office Commercial 4. 29.516 acres 5. A. Prade 5. "AG" 5. Medium Density Residential 5. 18.059 acres 6. Westerra Southlake LP 6. "AG" 6. Medium Density Residential 6. 14.081 acres 7. Greenway Rowlett 66 LP 7. "AG" 7. Medium Density Residential 7. 2.290 acres \\SLKSV4001\Local\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\99Exhibits\99099PR.doc • • • • an CD Iiiik LOCATION YAP tit'.S1RUxtx T .BJ65.P.306 g . v.NJ Coen. �; LLD-64T Ems- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION dorya ew) _ OW. .O�°SUMCY.A GAS.icmelr SI SU l°mia CAI�Cw.ry t ]CIM IA G I CCNVC5i5 So. r°c e N N..wo D v e P. Deed Ro lam a. a mos. I� (xmfv r. 3.5 1n.Oee.xsaaUoaX mTpanLreCo air.hw..we eW eocnSU SP-IA S.8'Ab'S.-C W m.more.°rt m only °o lI56. LLD-E®.1Y OW L r/s wsr 10s As' ..-......, r.r - ..•u' • a!Nrew.rlx Oqo I,rzt x.Care.Menu.(a:. .1..Op.I re •'"""'.svNrrc ro¢ •�. _• _u In°ronn W.Ore o1 Sw1Ne.e Boulevard(LIA.1 -o X. I i 2 { I. • r. • ________ _ ,I I - PRO): NB4 at.3T....qr..,ur norm G.eN J i Or l., oI i ; 'o °t.as re.m°mmNte m1a as o e,o a° -- _ •'..- " -- . t13N.18'lr Iarmy a cenv° 47a of 1']e' ° u.° HT __ �I� ' I O _ • _� j em _ .ro;3rat o Oalong, enma. °f=mlobe. + d ed In volume MIL Pov!root of tend e ION of dead m DJ. �w%i. go • 0 _r.... omccIn»c ...z I s - rem cy r®,o',r on"'.°e16�°ma u § e Ned of ^ •'� Q :.� F. � L_J:i -- 0 - I•.�'Ie d THENCE�°'°a a'�ea v'�°..s•along wm.°`tn.°'Mot.om'"Y nt'„ w a °r r°mar .w "` • .� ren , - .A •••• , - THENCE s W 55]w rm fauna 1a c°mv m...,N,s M N.Core..arc Smm '' aitcE.1.rn.¢ m w s.am sww.�e.d�vw.re Pc.OW a O..°x ry.i 'l... i i INExC[1.A 54'.!E 40104.dap IN oath Orr M wd SlrunrA dmporty 1 I r l�._ `- _ _ I• •'� 1 °°rit 6.W. 01.05'along.oast lam ale Car. �. .a. O am i. I7 M r CROUP lee;r]5�Noce of el land. 152.823,a a. __ _—____ __—_ •..t,T_— _- __ — __• I LID-CS L �N T-. --.____ ;_1j3 G96• I _ ._. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. (F.M. 1709) ._.a— —i_- LC•-x 6913•39-. t r•wlNU.S.CA A-co:' H'n:;r ek.OO.•c A-47 - . — — ,— — _— _ CONCEPT PLAN — — — CRESTWOOD I omv/O...l.0 I I ` I OFFICE PARK M t M OROUP, INC, nwa.w 1Apo CORP. Awu Per 4 von i�;uex AC I voa i,iro,tt.v I I AN ADDITION TO PAN SU .t+-sw-..as AC LLD-'E0. � S D ^' OUL LLD-Lm.o rrtuL I 3 I THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Ea6iee.re/P1mrcr. W I TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS .J.E LEVITY I I .W. HALL SURVEY E3..J. Rs,InC• ABSTRACT NO. 695 ESGINLE s PLVWERS PRESENT ZONING-AG --VEIL, • LUD-MED.DENSITY ne GenreRECD NOV 11 1996 EWRING USE-VACANT sav jerij.e vi 01' (5 1 PROPOSED ZONING-S-P-2 WITH 01 USES ' / F �/ 3.508 ACRES sun.r°.e GENERAL NOTES 9/ — I I- ALAN WARD SURVE'YINO CO. 1.1074.DWG Ada9..26.521 5. PORT NAM NUS 7.12 3.11021mc.P.A.ac-Be Swxs 29 OCTOBER 1996 ]1xmvl150:1 VA...n0 v.ss —GAS:.-na.1.46-12,— PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN • El Graham Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS February 23,2000 Mr.Dennis Killough Senior Planner City of Southlake 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake,Texas 76092 Re: Case 99-099,Revised Concept Plan Case 99-100,Plat Revision Lot 1R2R W.W.Hall No. 695 Addition Dear Mr.Killough: On behalf of Greenway-Southlake Office Partners L.P.,we are providing with this letter 27 full-size copies and 1-11x17" copy each of the revised Concept Plan and Plat Revision for the referenced location. This submittal is intended to address the City's comments dated February 14, 2000. Please review the attached at your earliest convenience and let us know if you need additional information prior to the March 9 Planning and Zoning meeting. The applicant requests a variance on the required 500' distance from N. Carroll Avenue to proposed access drive("B") shown on the Revised Concept Plan. This drive is proposed as a right in/right out only. With the construction of North Carroll and the associated median, there would be only one full access drive at this location. Consequently, the proposed right in/right out drive on FM 1709 would be needed to alleviate congestion at the full access drive on FM 1709. This congestion reduction should be attractive from a public safety standpoint. The applicant also requests a variance on the 5' buffer yard requirement along the west lot line of Lot 1R2R. This variance is requested due to common parking that is planned for the site, which will have two lots,but have the look of a single property. The absence of the 5' buffer yard at this location is consistent with the previously approved site plan/concept plan for Lots 1R1 and 1R2. With regard to your comment concerning additional fire lane requirements, the requirement for additional fire lanes has not been identified at this time and will be addressed during development of the site plan for this location. Regarding your comments on the Plat Revision,we have addressed your comments and offer the following stipulations: 1. The "land swap" associated with Lot 1 Block 9 will need to take place after the revised plat for Phase 1R— Southlake Town Square is processed. As you know, this has been submitted to the City for review. Consequently, the recording information for the corrected Lot lines for Lots 1 & 2 of Southlake Town Square Block 9 is not available and will be added after the plat revision for Phase 1R-Southlake Town Square is recorded. 2. Easements to be abandoned within Lot 1R2R have been indicated with shading on the Nat Revision. Utility companies have been listed for signatures per your comments for their approval of the proposed abandonment. D:IGREEN WAY\SOUTHLKEUallough7.doc Summit Office Park Centerpoint Two NationsBank 1300 Summit Ave., Suite 419 616 Six Flags Drive,Suite 400 705 W.Ave. B,Suite 201 Ft.Worth,Texas 76102 Arlington,Texas 76011 Garland,Texas 75040 (817)332-5756 (817)649-8530 • Metro(817)640-8535 (972)272-4655 FAX(817)336-6909 FAX(817)633-5240 FAX(972)272-4655 7843 f?EC'D Lb2 - I 3. Regarding your continent on split zoning,the applicant has submitted a zoning change application, which would eliminate any split zoning at this location. It is our understanding that the zoning application depends on approval of the plat revision. 4. We will obtain the"Certificate of Taxes Paid"and provide it as required prior to filing of the plat. If you need any additional information or would like to meet to discuss these documents, please give us a call. Sincerely, Graham Associates,Inc. • David M. Smith P.E. Project Engineer Attachments Cc: Jeff Williams Tommy Pigg Gary Martin • D:IGREE1'WAYISOUTHLKEUdllough7.doc Wi1 City of Southlake, Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 99-099 Revised Review No: Four Date of keview: 3/31/00 Project Name: Revised Concept Plan- Lot 1R2-1, W.W. Hall No. 695 Addition (Crestwood Office) APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Greenway-Southlake Office Partners, L.P. Graham Associates 23001 Cedar Springs, Suite 400 616 Six Flags Drive, Suite 400 Dallas, TX 75201 Arlington, TX 76011 Phone: (214) 880-9009 Phone: (817) 640-8535 Fax: (214) 880-0188 Attn: Tommy Pigg Fax: (817) 633-5240 Attn: David Smith CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/23/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency Y Not Evaluated. Building Articulation Y Not Evaluated Masonry Standards Y Not Evaluated Impervious Coverage Y Not Evaluated Bufferyards Y See Comment No 4 Interior Landscape Y Not Evaluated Driveways Y See Comments la& lb * This plan proposes two development options, an Alternate A and an Alternate B shown on the attached Concept plan. The applicant is requesting approval of both options to allow flexibility in placement of a user. • 1. Drive `B' must be a minimum of 500' from the intersection of Carroll Ave. The applicant proposes a right-in/right-out approximately 291' from the new intersection. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action 3/9/00 Allow driveway spacing on Carroll Avenue as shown.) (CC Action, March 21, 2000, allow as proposed requiring appropriate dedication for a decel lane once the shoulder is gone subject to City Engineer's recommendation) * All required easements must be dedicated by the associated replat. * Final design of the shown right-in/right-out control device must be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. 1 City of Southlake, Texas 2. Label all required bufferyards as to type and width. A 5' —Type A, bufferyard is required along the common property line. No bufferyard is shown. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action 3/9/00: Waive bufferyard along the common property line.) (CC Action, March 21, 2000, allow as proposed) 3. It appears that additional fire lanes may be required along the west side of the proposed buildings. Contact the Fire Marshall for additional information in this regard. All fire lanes are subject to City Fire Marshal approval. 4. Driveway intersecting N. Carroll Ave. must be a minimum of 250' from the existing off-site driveway to the north. The proposed spacing is 100'. (CC Action, March 21, 2000, allow as proposed) P&ZAction,March 9, 2000:Approved(3—2)subject to Revised Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated March 3, 2000, • approving Alternate B; and • excluding banks with drive-through lanes and drive-through ATMs; and • stating that a portion of the tract has "S P-2"zoning and they are adding a tract with "NR-PUD"zoning to it and went with an "S-P-2"zoning in order to match the districts; and stating that they want the "S P- 2"type of zoning in order to exclude drive-through banks and allow a right-in/right-out driveway; and • and adding the condition of a deceleration lane and putting the money in escrow • as noted above. City Council Action, March 21, 2000: Approved (5-0) First Reading subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated March 3, 2000 • subject to the actions taken by the Planning and Zoning Commission; • accepting Alternate Plan 'B', deleting "Drive-thru Banks"as a permitted use; • allowing driveway spacing along Carroll Avenue as proposed; • allowing right-in/right-out drive on F.M. 1709 as shown; • requiring appropriate dedication for a decel lane once the shoulder is gone subject to City Engineer's recommendation; • waiving the 5'Type 'A'bufferyard along west; • granting a variance for 2 parking spaces; • requiring no parking forward of the 50'building line. * Although it is not typically evaluated at this time, the applicant is advised to consider the 4:1 slope setback requirement for nonresidential buildings from the north property boundary. The buildable area on this site may be afftected by this requirement Encroachment above this slope line from the adjacent residential property to the north appears possible in both proposed options. Such an * A letter of permission and/or common access easement must be obtained from the adjacent property owner(s)prior to issuance of a building permit for any construction of off-site pavement. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along State Highways or Farm to Market Roads. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat Revision must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a site plan must be approved by the Planning and 2 • City of Southlake, Texas Zoning Commission and City Council, and a fully corrected site plan submitted to the Building Department along with landscape plan, irrigation plan,building plans, and all required fees. Required fees may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Impact Fees,Tap Fees and related Permit Fees. * This review is based on the "0-1" Zoning District Regulations. * Although review of the following issues is generally not provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following city ordinances prior to submittal of a site plan for this property. A Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on the north, east, south, and west building facades) per §43.9C l e, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Masonry requirements per§43.9C l a, Ordinance 480,as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and §43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43-C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13, Ordinance 480, as amended; and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Residential adjacency standards per§43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for . , vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended • Mechanical Equipment Screening per § 43.13c, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Impervious coverage limitations per § 18.5I, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Deceleration lanes as per § 5.4a as per Ordinance 634. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Denotes Informational Comment 3 City of Southiake, Texas cc: Tommy Pigg, Greenway-Southiake Office Partners, L.P. VIA FAX: ABOVE Jeff Williams, Graham Associates VIA FAX: ABOVE Frank Bliss, Cooper& Stebbins VIA FAX: 817-251-8717 N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\99\99099CP4.DOC • • 18-13 City of Southlake, Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) Case: 99-099 Date of Review: 2 -10 - 00 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Lot 1R2-1, W. W. Hall No. 695 Addition; Crestwood Office Park(Rezoning/Concept Plan) Review#3-Resubmittal OWNER: PREPARED BY: Greenway—Crestwood Park Partners L. P. Graham Associates, Inc. 2301 Cedar Springs, Suite 400 616 Six Flags Drive, Suite 400 Dallas, TX 75201 Arlington, TX 76011 Phone: (214) 880-9009 Phone: (817) 640-8535 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT(817)481-5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The applicant did not submit a Tree Survey meeting the requirements of Schedule B of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. The Concept Plan does show the location of existing trees but not the ones within the area of the proposed building. This is acceptable because the Bois D' Arc along Carroll Avenue are in a single mass and would be extremely difficult to survey and then separately identify. 2. The existing Eastern Red Cedars and Post Oaks on the site are protected but the Bois D' Arc along N. Carroll Dr. are not protected. The only consideration for the Bois D' Arc trees to be considered protected is the function of their purpose as an effective screen. As the Concept-Plan shows a portion of the trees would be removed for the construction of the proposed buildings in the east portion of the property for the construction of the buildings and access drives. * All requirements and regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B, apply to the entirety of this lot. Please be aware of the penalties of not applying the tree preservation protection methods required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. BUILDING INSPECTIONS • ' J.P. 6 G.H. STRUNCK 0 tl ft ➢� y� IDVOL. 6365, PG. 206 '.''j ME➢EZ, LTD. D.R.T.C.T. a ', 77R 'FK1. , A-695 TR. 3D1 VOL. 12051, PG. 465 Tir' '1 1 D,R.T.C.T. W.V.HALL SURVEY .. A-695 TRACT 3D3 200 N. CARROLL AVE. N, n ,11. VW HALL SURVEY LUD-MED. ZONING DENSITY RESIDENTIAL , :� 8,q.� t` _ D 1050 E.SOUTHLAKE BLVD. L ZONING DENSITY Y ZONED, AG y B P 1C, ,}�,'; OFFICEPAORK s RB'n•r s2' E IR;ram ,AY.. rrl LUD -MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 r ', Illi 1 Bq,qy -+` 17 ° " srJnRA6 A 9 1 SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE SOUTHIAKE BLVD. _ S 89'42'41' E v� 555.73' 2 W �%, I tl PHASE I SITE _ CAM. A, SLIDE 4892 CCISTOG 5�vw i -*�'^j- -__ ___ ,I'r251.t __..._._z- _`�_-;_�Q'' -� _�ol�a'� m - 11, • `, COOPER 6 STEBBINS, L.P. g Y� U I I I I I I I I I I , �,Yr0.FJ� � s I,`. 1I r.K .: a 1 '` F") �bx TJS IA e - 1256 MAIN ST, SUITE 240 f .'"a71,7 rl "`�A�T�n. %':71X"''f r yam..Jw' �'ca ITI`O - -(13.3J 27' LUD - MIXED USE • f �,f, �/'-p/ � ��� ;' 1 �C) R=9SD Orr ZONED NR-PUDW2 _ �II I�..�L(,j� 1 ✓ CO-'D DV VICINITY MAP T I I I i � / =l ,� i4s`' EB,S BB'?6'S] E IR aAra rAA{ - #:T 4, `W 1 C)r.i. .. LOT WEN 1 'LOT 2 I C=99.-LS' 1 YxA¢Ai y' '1';''' i a... G5. I it:r +'Yrllln USSNI'M M� BLnLK'l ti I �'xl .. ' V¢Ao, t(' ,Q °+• � 1.982 AC. — -i �wtN.n ilp rb w cLre-a ' ., Wi1.\,A� �/ tEi PROPOS,u_ mil- IP,ROP i.ED w CY o zs so l3o zoo PEI fME➢EZ, LTD. •J I yk '/ ii�lj����� # OFFICES . 0 SCALE:l--so• VOL. 12051, PG. 465 I - / .//,/,,.,,j��/�7fi --V 5 5,700.r 'OFFIC I T D.R.T.C.T. 'w ' / A-695 TRACT 3➢3 r„ I 'Sc %/ - L RAKING B( I3 N j WV HALL SURVEY Q I :,4 j %/�//� " IA PARKING RE 333 RAKING.I ,q 33 I050 E.SOUTHLAKE HLYD. a>r4 , jj /• _ _ -,-- `n _ ,,Y, - ALTERNATE B LUD-MED. DENSITY .. .�^V3A r • 1 _ ZONING- SF-1 l4.^,. . _ � i_Q, r rw,Tsx +' T___ r_ •• -mac _—____ r„ y m L I;.T. A•nth..ram-TrR, 2 i r--;-`-*—\oNrwrT .a .I L Ir mfLin I L o� - -- ----.._..�-,-- fi EARo: i' 217, l ��' rr • w 121 DI' - -�- 1 (.` •01'T6'V5' B N HH-53'24'-.YJ 11 BB'OJ'IN V ---------EAST-SOUTIILAKE-BOULEVARD---1=a -165: ----- - = ,1a;;r—a ---------- '----;:;°:. ---...---EAST SOU-TOLAKE-BOULEVARD'--'------- (F.M. 1700) cn_V 39.4I•z7• a - S.vP- u3a R.D.v., Lc=',2v OD' n DO'JD•. C S g (F.M. 1709) ram" S (130'R.CI4, -- -_ _ Lrrsn�ar Im v,a..au- n3 S 7 l 2 S SOUTH CARROLL/I709 LT➢. . ,, I-r_l a=r = D.R.T.c.7. - OWNER, WESTERA SOUTHLAKE. L.P. ANITA PRIDE ,,. T J6I T _ VOL. 12615, PG. 339 VOL. 12615. PG. 339 • = I‘.1.,,!,,' �- �'" A�` A 529 TR. 7A GREENVAY-UAESIDXAO C.TIPARK E PAR- D.R.T.C.T. D.R.T.C.T. Q t 1 ,, �,p~"'' J. FREEMAN SURVEY 3KERYAY-SOfiHLARE 6f(CE PAR" GebkE:Sc'`imaC:.:!.;` ",c ' +- °�`w% NORTH CARROLL AVE. cwrAcs rD,Mr PIcO A-899 TR. 4G A-899 TR. 4O2 :'�-'A '•YA awi. YT"'"s• 1- 2331 MAR SPRINGS,SUITE Alm c+Ci Q�' ,0�r1 ..,.w M.. .: :. 3 ''`y� % LUD-OFFICE COMMERCIAL DUEws•TEXAS 75201 0. KNIGHT SURVEY 0. KNIGHT SURVEY — .w �T- 1 5i) I tI - ZONING-SP-2 __ BrrlcE' Izloee3-vm9 400 S. CARROLL AVE. 400 S. CARROLL AVE. � IL /Z.`.x, �� '¢ PAX. L2u7e®-OIDD I - MED. DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LUD-MED. DENSITY RESIDEN-IAL I I I I I I ✓ . PROPO'I I--- I1�r L_L q_DT 2 SITE DATA CHART COVER ITEIOISI.L.P. ZONING- AG ZONING-AG mr r roc . :'—_' OFFICE. — '`-L J�Ii 191. • i EXISTING ZOUTG SP-2 FEN o-t USES CONTACT. FRANK BLISS ,ulw - 0>1l i'6 •F,LIEB.9 ' ToEw4.ilron PROPOSED EOIIrG SP-2 FOR 0-1 USES 1E56 MAIM ST, SUITE RIO RI I IT 10,800 SP _ L�.T., ,.❑U f14 IT 4 1 TEl TEP.LAK LAND 16E DCSIWITION ICDIW IE161TT RCS {MIXED DSE SWMAMB TEXAS 76092 r o6.3T0�1 PARKING RE'''�3T j- { p' GROSS ACREAGE 4.R6)ACRES TAXI DI).2517.,8 IJ 29. m _ 1 93_E. PARKING SA'■ -37 r_ . WY ACREAGE 9.96x ACRES NET R D V.¢DIUTIM ge- ROPO RED XI l[R OF PROPOSED LOTS 1.1 y I 1' PROPOSED BUILDING AREA ALTERNATED 11.710 Y ENGINEER, EXISTING OFFICES r'pIETH . 6 SS EE}} K ' I ALTERNATE A•IX,)OD S DAVID ASSOCIATES, INC. '1- Y ' NXIDER 0'STOti[S I GRAM SASSO A-1: 4 03 SF l ,- NAXINIM P41LD11G MEIOIT 39' 616 SIM I1A65 D0IYC.SUITE A00 D:,„L Cg -- �_ P KIN 1-KQ'1I +20 AMU..., TEXAS,76011 6T•-) - .0"5• .--__ a� __ _F__- P NG 5 O44 z0 R001 AREA BY BY ALTERNATE 3-17•)m Sr°MI¢ OFFICE. teln6N0-B9J9 �r'�•y./�� ' . tit) -r� ryA�'.,,��5,, uK I I ALTERNATE A-10.900 SF OFFICE L 1.100$T DIN! FAR. LBI)>63]-5210 - q sJ6 LIK" -- �.'' ^ z `'D 7 I I 7 v rt PARMI.REWIRED ALTERNATE B=64 SPACES-ALTERNATE A.5/SPACES, 3 _ FF ,,^ ..-..__ rq Trw-`� �. _»_ __.U�� .1. PARKING PROVIDED ALTERNATE E•66 SPACES-ALTERNATE A=57 SPACES LOT MI L LOT 1R2R ..___-_________SPA_ll:_.. ._.,Re_---�N_..__.--...1 I-' I -'r' '� r IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE MAXIMUM 465)., ALTERNATE L L A•55,970 Sr V.A. HALL NO. 695 ADDITION //A.,`\C\ IR uNLET - ,-I , ____ .,,) • IMPmY1W5 COVERAGE SI®VN ALTENR/.TE•=SO.000 Y(6301 l RT. U .3.oLT` -_-____-- �' _ --_ ALTERNATE A.59.780$f(6421 I CITY b'SOUIIAKE,IEXAs LAWRIE MATT.TEXAS • ALTERNATE A CITY CASE NO: EA 00-oo0 �. ^ x9• ,:. ,-av� 'ssas azu*;:�.: "..A�.a'sY.TY•�'sa .> -- -may • REVISED CONCEPT PLAN GOOD •FULTON '& FARRELL ARCHITECTS EAST SOUTHLAKE BLVD. EA IN. ,,,,, � _ Inv'» SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS AEC()FEB 2 3 2000 :0.,; 7777 w . r Nu kom.. .a-1 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-335 • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1R2, W. W. HALL NO. .695 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 4545, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; LOT 1, BLOCK 9, SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDES 4892 & 4893, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND A PORTION OF THE ABANDONED NORTH CARROLL AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY; AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.982 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT USES AND "NR- PUD" NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON 'THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Page 1 16- 167 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses and "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights . on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking,facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Page 2 and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Page 3 B-1S • therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 1R2, W. W. Hall No. 695 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4545, Plat Records., Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 1, Block 9, Southlake Town Square, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 4892 &4893, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of the abandoned North Carroll Avenue right-of-way; and being approximately 1.982 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses and "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with "C- 3" General Commercial District uses to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the specific conditions established in the motion of the City Council and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"C." SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Page 4 1 g-IQ be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILESIZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Page 5 �g-X)4 SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense." Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Page 6 of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Pagel �i1 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: N;\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Page 8 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1R2, W. W. Hall No. 695 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4545, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Lot 1, Block 9, Southlake Town Square, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 4892 & 4893, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; and a portion of the abandoned North Carroll Avenue right-of-way; and being approximately 1.982 acres. BEGINNING at a'/Z inch iron rod set for corner at the intersection of the west right-of-way line of North Carroll Avenue(a 100 foot RO.W.,a 115 foot at this point)and the north right-of-way line of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709)(a 130 foot R.O.W.),said point being the southeast corner of said Greenway tract; THENCE North 88°54'16"West,along said north right-of-way line,a distance of 74.70 feet to a PK nail found for corner; THENCE North 88°48'31" West, continuing along said north right-of-way line, a distance of 42.63 feet to a TxDOT brass cap found for corner; THENCE South 88°36'02"West,continuing along said north right-of-way line,a distance of 3.74 feet to a'A inch iron rOd with an AW cap found for corner; THENCE North 88°53'24" West, continuing along said north right-of-way line, a distance of 97.48 feet to a 'A inch iron rod with an AW cap found for corner, said point being the point of curvature of a curve to the left,having a delta of 00°26'03",a radius of 11,524.16 feet and a chord bearing and distance of North 89°06'25"West,87.31 feet; THENCE northwesterly,continuing along said north right-of-way line and along the arc of said curve to the left,a distance of 87.31 feet to a'A inch iron rod with an AW cap found for corner; THENCE North 00°17'22"East,leaving said north right-of-way line and along the west line of said Greenway tract and the easterly line of Lot 1R1,of the said W.W.Hall No.695 Addition,a distance of 278.64 feet to a'A inch iron rod set for corner,said point being the northeast corner of .said Lot 1R1; THENCE South 89°42'41" East,,along the north line of said W.W. Hall addition and the south line of a tract of land conveyed by deed to J.P.&G.H.Strunk,as recorded in Volume 6365,Page 206,Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas,a distance of 304.28 feet to a'A inch iron rod set for corner, said point being in the west right-of-way line of said North Carroll Avenue, said point also being the point of curvature of a non-tangent curve to the right,having a delta of 03°34'27", a radius of 950.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of South 08°26'57"East,59.25 feet; THENCE southeasterly,along said west right-of-way line and along the arc of said non-tangent curve to the right,a distance of 59.26 feet to a'A inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South 04°27'23" West, continuing along said west right-of-way line, a distance of 110.53 feet to a'A inch iron rod set for corner; THENCE South, continuing along said west right-of-way line, a distance of 113.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 86,318 square feet or 1.982 acres of land,more or less. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT1WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING1480-335.DOC Page 9 . 1 .. ..0 z ED 0 0 X X O . 2 :4 - . 0 . m -../. .,; 1 1 VOL. 6365. PG 206 .:4,,.. '1 *?- rm MEDEZ. L TO. A-695 TR. 31/1 .7. \ .9° VEIL. 121351, PG. 465 IT 14 HALL SURVEY 3 D.R T.E.T. 200 N. CARROLL AVE \ 11 CV. \‘ A-695 TRACT 3113 O. TO LUD-14ED. DENSITY RESIDENTIAL XV HALL SURVEY ZONING-AG i ,-_,.... 1. av, \\ z 1050 E.SDUTHLAXE BLVD. E CRESTVIOOD LUD-MED. DENSITY V ;C3 1, OFFICE PARK ZONING-SFI ZONED AG LUD-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 1" :.g II I tc-% 1'. SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE NA PHASE I 7 I'-..------“, S 89,2'41' E ___,___6‘6,.. •60J•61 ...my. /7./6.6 /''."555 73' -Thrj4-" .3::: 71 t" ._._''' .. '1 1 2 \1 CAB. A. SLIDE 4892 SOLITHWE BLVD. I ... 4 " SITE P.R.T.C.T. Ot71 ,........... i - - --"- :.t..7:;,-F.-/-.-3Dp.../2 , .1-.;.-.-.11.41T/ - -,.., COOPER 5 STEBBINS. L.P. N : i .•,....t..)Ckt.4 IL?, '4 fiv....,:. ,.,..,.,- 1 ,, : 1.„., 1 •.:':,1.,-..3.,,:,,,,,,;,...<,,40.!.., . ''' .\.\ 1256 MAIN ST. SUITE 240 03 "...." - I.cc.$......7• LUD-MIXED USE ."--a- ' ' ,.,r ' •-.'E:t. F-1 ki _-__::, .tE17,4,,„,., . 1..1_1(91.)..-.' - . ......., . • 4 i 1 -lt;?..7;..)''.:.•,,.,3P c VICINITY MAP rn t) ta mma v 40 , 'in .-"."--.- .: '" ,..?.7r.., :'-',...-:tiLaILIvt..,k,vii-_-I•." 1. 11=1. ...romm. ..11. 4AT. - - •- 1PROP 0..Eb o AU 50 000 COO FRET $, 1 .77.11r- OFFIC • 1 ,,. i 5C.MZ:1.•0 50; 0 0,700 a I vol. 12051. PG. 465 O ii , 4(V . '.77,011,7%5"/;;•,r/..T.14.7 .- "-',,c• 11„' 0,000 SI ; 1 ‘.0 2 W.'- D.R.T.C.T. „,,! '..,.11 /..,,,,Y0 -.II g i•E: ;'=r.. -.7-.-.1, ic*P1,T,g . iftn) A-695 TRACT 3113 .i: "P;4,1 zilr.,,)" IN NALL SuRVEY '",1.:$ ..'i,‘/.7 v., :, , . A:!-- =1... ..1.-- ALTERNATE B 0 1050 E.SOUTHLAKE BLVD. 'i; .....„? ,x __ , . . __., . .,,,, _.., _ -• , .....,. 1 441,31 A'''a,i. ?-',K •-',-;.,• . ..'':.0•: ---- %'IV.' L 3,- •-iii•J -:-3 ,. I 4.0.). ril - - ; lar-Fervelii;N:.;;141.--_;,,,,,.;;0 r...--•.."---,t9.'--{". , et,4.1-At, 4._,Fi. 7174:-'ff-7f..7.11:-"T----- '"---"'' "--- . --.2„- .--To,..,....,ii,:ti..., r-r -- -- L.,,J12,..,.._.,L'., --;31-fri i:,.:5',"'---- . H2:.1T 2,1%KI / P.J., ' S.,:1`:.1,_:....,.... • -•-•--------EAST-SOUTRLAKE.BOULEVARD-----!-::;1-3..3-,,,g --- s'-'7'•12.;1` -Jr- II (F.M. 1700) 02-1-1 5L•.41'2,V _..1.44,; (F.11. 1709) OTT R 65. .. .f.-.•: 1.__g toy env/ - ----- ' a -. f...2........c....,4 Kr arro...44-T..•1 „.; ;„,2. ;‘,.... SOUTH CARROLL/1709 LTD. ed . qt..c..-,..,:.,..r.,..-:-.).-,--,-,...,.:,,0,4,.N.;r.---if-''..",..4.-,1,•.:W."1--; %;rial.' WESTEPA SaUTRLAKE. L.P. ANS Th PRADE A-529 TR. 7A GREET•I•1-CRESTiOTS3 Tv.PAWN. J. FREEMAN SURVEY GM...-STRAMAla ENTICE PAK D R.T C,T. D.R.T C.T. 9'4''4.'72 '" NORTH CARROLL AVE. cuirect.11440.PIE0 COMMERCIAL 2301 MAR PROWS.AIM 400 OKLA,TEXAS 712o1 a. KNIGHT SURVEY EL KNIGHT SURVEY ________ZCIN.INCL..--2.72 . writ.1214.0-.00 400 . AOL 400 S. CARROLL AVE. ...., .7 1 /1 tl,$'1 •"1 $•..ILL•NLL....1.4.9 1 P I -1 ru.cA1.1403-0i50 1 S DENCSRRL I TY REASVE.ENTIIDAL L UD-MED. DENS1 TY RESEWI-1.1111111 ., - PROPO .,,,,, I LI II,., i 1 SITE DATA CHART cow" iNs.L• CENTACT.'RPM mu ZONING-AG ZONING-AG $....".'6.• /.`',:,:nta,..Y.7. OFFICE -_- MS NA1N IT,VOTE 240 PROPOSE..1. SP-2 FOR 0-1 USES mom..TEXAS 71.092 .1 •If,t'...'.1,-:,€.,. -071 " II 1 I Et 1E6 LAND Irle St S14/0011N nT5 rSoAelu,RN AACMERLU.S IrTeTr LT sirsS :, ROPOiEb IC AT. rOFuTt,I CCTO.TB2I3T1 3.0111/1.1M OO .4.01E11 OF PROPOTTO LOIS P.POSE0.111.1.AREA ALTERNATE 3.17.700 SF ENGINEERS EXISTING OFFICES ' . 4'11 it: _ !i". blANK ' i ;.- /NA.BER Or METES ALTERNATE A•15700 ST OM.ASSOCINICS.INC. I 110.10 301114 ;.‘,5 2• - 4. .141g i.44,4 '.. nsaINUN INALRI.'CUM . 616 SIN FLAGI TAM.Suln 403 ATILT..TE•53.74011 lok...,.. .‘ • ,f.___ i0.5 go:- = r. IPOZIONG,lorN 0 20 rLaola AREA ir.uSE ALTON...II-IL.sr arra% PaTLI.TE•-113E0 Sr OFFICE•4.400 Sr UNA Orr ICE.1.10.040-01333 rm.EB1/1693-1240 ii-iii.$.61L-4"-GO-241r--'1'' ,,r;n'''.""!. 7, ! c'eg. 1 : .'.,...'..'.'''', NevNING REDATA. ALTERNATE A.64 yams-ALTERNATE A•1.W." ;- ,,,,,,,,..._,„,. :t'''sr,/:-,0.- -1;Z...-0- ;_l; ,1)-1-1t4/P-1-I 4, Pranna PRZNITIED puTERPLATE 3•.SPACES-ALTER54TE A•1T SPARES LOT IRI•LOT IR211 . /4./....4.. i INPERVIOLO COALIT.E%UMW TATO ALTERNATE••A-101170 Sr INTERviaws covER.0 Dam Al......r••35003 sr TA= 55 NALL NO.1.90 AMT. •A,,,A.As0 ALTERNATE A.SS.700 Sr ALM CITA Or TouTNLAKE,TEN. .......1 on ca. ...; I- ---. -- -- • TARR/AT MATT.ISM B - ALTERNATE A . CITY CASE NOt 74 119-ailu Kactocacior7C6.96-6.67.6c.... , 3.6.00200.1.1.0.0.00.1.0..0.0.0.-,..00.---...TAETT,-.0.......1.0-csas.scrx...-mxtvreats....e.,00s0a0.0massTAA„......0.-.0, -^ - • . 034220.24.151212.0........3.0T.300,010.1.04 REVISED CONCEPT PLAN GOOD FULTON.& FARRELL ARCHITECTS EAST SOUTHLAKE BLVD. - IS RIM - .-....; •...• SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS FIF_CD FEB 2 3 2000 • • EXHIBIT "C" This page reserved for the approved City Council motion. • N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WP-FILESIZBA\PENDING\480-335.DOC Page 11 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, extension 814 Subject: CISD -Johnson Elementary School - Developer's Agreement Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor to execute a commercial developer's agreement with CISD for improvements at Johnson Elementary School. Background Information: On January 4, 2000, the City Council approved a revised site plan for an addition to Johnson Elementary school on North Carroll Avenue. Included in the improvements at the school is the installation of new fire. hydrants, an 8-inch water line looping through the property and the installation of a 12-inch water line in North Carroll Avenue extended to the north property line of the school property. This developer's agreement covers the construction of these water system improvements. The agreement contains standard language except for the following: CISD requests that the following fees be waived or credit given for: 2% Administration Fee 3% Inspection Fee Water Impact Fee Sewer Impact Fee Roadway Impact Fee Park Fee Since this is an existing facility, CISD requests that the Park Fees be waived. CISD has not met with the Park Board to discuss any parkland dedication credit or usage. 5G-1 Financial Considerations: Per City policy, the City will reimburse the CISD for the difference in the cost of an 8-inch water line and a 12-inch water line for the construction of the 12-inch water line along North Carroll Avenue. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: This is the standard developer's agreement, originally prepared by the City Attorney. Alternatives: Approve it, deny it, or modify it. Supporting Documents: Agreement Plat Exhibit Staff Recommendation: Please place on City Council Agenda for April 4, 2000 for City Council consideration and approval. Charlie J. as City Engineer 5G-2 ARRGLL?INDEPENDENT SCMOQ::P WSTR1.0 JOHNSON';E"LEMENTARY-S:GH;OOL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer", of ;3`-fp.FOU,Ki CLASSROOM' P0I.T'1'C3Ns-.`-``TP 44.OfIVS ' LEMEN]ARY SC:HOOOU, hereinafter referred to as "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and. between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the Addition (a • commercial development) and to the Off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all the `,equire public facilities "s'd"e,ermine' ,_ : .y su ;i e _"sand p'pro Thd; ila; s, to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required .for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted• by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity. reasonably acceptable to the City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. • C. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-3 construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the Addition. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by the City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned herein above which are intended to be public facilities shall be vested in the City, and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, the City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire Agreement shall occur at such time that the City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved, and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water , street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent • (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing (95% Standard); CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-4 Pry d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and acceptance by the City. F. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said Addition which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the Addition so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a .form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-5 • regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City. J. The Developer agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. II. FACILITIES A. ON-SITE WATER The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final _pro 4 plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line ,iiipon ccfmple`i hconstr`,.uctiori,. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. B. DRAINAGE • Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary gp rore" drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the Director of Public Works, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Developer hereby agrees to fully .comply with all EPA and TNRCC requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-6 C. STREETS NOT-APPLICABLE)I The street construction in the Addition will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the Director of Public Works. 1. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and two year operation of street lights, which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition; or an agreement with utility provider stating that no charge will be made for street lights for the two-year duration. b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the Addition, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances; c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended • based upon the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as prepared by the Developer's engineer by an engineering study or direction of the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features, however, should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means, the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 2. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-7 It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final pproved plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, engineering, permits and Impact Fees. In the event that certain sewer lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line .iFa omp[eti©riof=tte constt�uctior . E. EROSION CONTROL During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this Addition. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours 'to clear the soil from the affected areas. -If the Developer does not remove the soil within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed • either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the Addition. CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-8 PFF- F. AMENITIES It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture pond and lakes mproveme ifs`'�'un f a'=scict ..x,..,.,.w..u...�...A' L.v..A...........iJ, ✓..o ,.e .v'y'a-., .. . .. .. .. ... ... e... 4..x- ... .L.aa...w"i,..h� G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect the City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION • Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans to be stamped "Released for Construction" by the Director of Public Works must be submitted. 3. All fool rogid to bo paid to the City. 4. Developer Agreement must be executed. CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-9 5. The Developer, or Contractor, shall furnish to the City a policy of general.liability insurance, naming the City as co- insured, prior to commencement of any work. 6. A Pre-Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors, major Sub-Contractors, Utilities and appropriate Government Agencies. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY AND ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-10 C. Approval by the Director of Public Works or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the Director of Public Works signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This Agreement or any part herein, or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his or her own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-11 F. Work performed under the Agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this Agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the Agreement with such renewed Agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES A. IMPACT FEES Water, wastewater and roadway impact fees are waived for the four classroom addition. B. OFF-SITE SEWER (NOT APPLICABLE) C. OFF-SITE WATER CISD will construct the 12-inch water line within the right of way of North Carroll Avenue from Highland Street to the north property line of Johnson Elementary. D. PARK FEES No park land dedication or fee will be paid as this is a building addition to an existing facility. E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-A. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT By: Title: Dr. Ted Gillum, Superintendent of Schools Address: 1201 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092 CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-12 STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public - My commission expires: CITY,OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor • ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-13 REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The Letter of Credit may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against Letters of Credit must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining Letter of Credit. 9. Expiring Letter of Credit must be replaced by substitute Letters of Credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the Letter of Credit held by the City. CISD Johnson Elementary Developer Agreement 5G-14 11 Q..• . tTmaam STATE 0y TEM TOM Y to certify Mat L Coy D.Londe... LRattan.le ProfessionalProfessionalInd COu6[P 01 RRYR 6 g of of the State Teas hay.plvttad More auk...ham RIpR ALL 0aN 2?•IfO�P!®Et1f9 that Gn+O. COD. I.W d actual w m m Um and Dot W tot mama.and mole piW. • APPROTID)0T T.CDT COUR= W panto.!corn A.be Pnpmfy marked e a Do OAmd,and Nal tbb muse ace tract f Ind...tad m!m r.Th.ew wormy. d mot" No. ��L>7/ DAM plat w momenta that army cam. n ma a swim 1.Y........ Lell.Tarrant County.rexel,meld mint d land Wag comm.Le Carroll PmdalamISO.maardan,to the dead recorded In Toetme cola.P AB Deed Name.. DAMDM of Tarrant County.Taus,mid 16.,00 mom of land lalna more peetlealmLy dm..by maim mod Nona.m follows IDA•D OTNCIrT9aCRT1RT: er ea BV 6m t ear�6 .adlot i .r. 1 Hxnr.of Tmmnl Gory,l'v m' 1° volume 9E0-i.]. Poem as T+t M a GN01a.RP.t.a F0.1mB • ���' .41 O cE3ev BR•at'e. t 17.BBtore yL b pWo the 0thwmtcamsof - Mae off gold Block t•1.fl Dam W metthlamb.K carom of lvlat a9Q Mock tl wnYyeilR mu Faltat 04101 b We plat nitl Iv Cehlvet A. 91da ...• e12. Pl.t Rector.d Tenant Gamy. Tares mod rnntivuh6.l,R the mute Me of sal.Mock I. 1180.37 fool le a I/9 look hon rod found st Um mrthwed carom of ha lume 91E I].,ldPage dllba0O, PIat3R cords of Temnt °° �0 WHISPERING LANE to Ns rR,1700 6 Candy,Term; ' T T -I-- 1t26NC1 0 0P I?O? a. eao N.veal Ups d mid MOM.Fatal.•--�I le m an fed AddWeo 40.97 fort L.a 1/2 loch rod ferm4 a!the northeast earner I ---r --III I ----- I m d Fat 1. T. Ducap No. lain Addition to the f Bo0Whke. Taus 'I ►R 1 0 P E R f fl 0 0 6 L L E 9 i A T 1 a 1�®PO 010E iSLTa9 f•••• a t �dlo.L the plat nod In Cabinet A. 91ha 1016. Plat Records d •GIURA 1WIRRoa.LP. I I VOL 9Bf1-1p,FA DI 1 CAR.A.SLIDE eye I L aTdE'r_)ar 4amut tS y.Tort vol.faM{PG me 1. DAT.Gi .12 II1 I I PATAT. I I TIRl1R a R.BP 01'BY• elvy Ufa mkt Fa e Rae of cot+, aP/AO feet 111f l 1 I 1 01) I d 6 I 0-9 I 0 T1RI(CE 0 OQ 10•PP a. .1oW the vest I1ne d said Lot 4 et 003.74 feat ------" 1 1 IS'ONAIN.•v.Bl 1 Inch Inn sod hat witd h Plmlla a ttaompll 'lertle.!Imw.'.ul. I 1 1 I I LOA Mi TAPoGNT Pek1l I. mol4h90 n-Mast er O-f Uw d Eul t and Hl led Bto W 401.1T feet l a yy I -JII-le•OA -1 r16.Olt JIL I TRICE N BP al'pR V.almerR Wd Oortharl R-O-R nn4 BB4.00 hot b e 1P+ I I I I I 'I,1 16.OA RICO•ALL Ms HT T®a PI�NT9: yowl LL Na lntmwvllso LM wterly d e(aremmnaatl Still • �� f'S III I I I I��as1.Gann.Isn earefv.ner called'amnd(.nether one Or ) cmrru Avant. + BP69'Zl'0-MITI r ffff _-J__ Y lb.arum of that carts.p.remt �d w0(04 10 or Omllhv T 72206 N OP 00'0P E" alone the mot R-0-R Iln0 of mid North Carroll ...DM.Imtellattan d me CI I W I/7 @9 BLOET \ 1�.>®J '} Candor,Tara,beep man pmrUndarly dom..Immo for W porno*. 118123 lot l the POtN!OF BLBMNWc d malsohtR 36APo acre a VOL PI. O. 1 ;I�\1Le•v.L w1�.Ln��Oo�eLh a .�.m lad el�a fovea 0cO l79 n.We/t00p(�1P0) Ea•.Tlmv]ONE.iDA•Au.i¢e ar Txva PHP�9e(]: DSLGT. 1 '• 1 anl7 d.hieh Y Eaepr Yvole.m4 end cwlmaed.Ommma(.1 dolenor11 1V. I Norm .ahq aal...�e.qv(�l]Y.m.and l\mEhdm4Rl5armis lh.Qta rHAt Curvn. ISO. baty na a des kmeBT adept this Plan I 1T y W Tenon M dpnye.f Mad that MusD) mad•6ti whm®r deetoallvp the\maim eBon deeilbt property ex I $ Omol r loam.be More by rerun of ebs er of a�u mimfl [R t9 .ar.n la.lo ddmtl ter the puryaa f tie es any CAA'®01NE Worm no.nova er tLig o roTaa•nee4 r doped or P.11.00P IN.lee AWR30N LID Ud. .Nth.d or flight In No Mr)by Poranterer awned and operated•h ddiUon b the O! d 9omthlake, Tmiul Qwmy, Teas and.herby VO --L Na Or mace atom Omm1 pnpaty.n Imma Mars dmerlMd atl anon aedjml b W puhla vm honor th me fas"and rf6N1+^af-.q Jae.n --_--- J` , f- Ns•urhea of Owners prapert h es muss.l*Aum.farm.do.L miQL a 11tiLTOA3 wI UST R 13t b 1 he tam la of L martial.and.nail a.m..ahemof m mOm000.by hereon. VOL.ICirl paee.PO.LTeo 64e1b,`! LOT 13 ado d.bi Dry and nLoiohanj right efL 'umuum or pt°Im'Ud nit m.y ne. er�mm®ltti.Y my.wtteleMpmpmty.ram dW00 read merlrueve m (�I R fades AG ,� to 'g ham or phlad N ham ha Du future ham aaak.the rny.wt..sub LJl I.tm b for ofot�b pwaoo dam�a�e to prap.ry due b m sq Thor!am no Rue mold LI.imonot. • �l nor.Norm.dWL Out end Nbrleavl 4artYJew avJ en be -_ 7-IB'O.L .. • eRraletuh+t met M on•dt alrnnm�ohm boo esnmd�q be apewNm a( Sum.NM-.y d 1PW. I.r7"ai gLT2 TtLe01.6.mo tao. 1 --- X m�tai 1iaaY Adirpart a Wrnll aDOb•a st m®i.W D.neon/tat id/mie ' W D.aTD.T. [}1 3T: I I fe y a a marsla�oq a iu�mi+�lnVm1�wuaa�mid Fan®Ida pr�vp.M0. bmnl4 LSD a� located In or In the ettreLeralaarlal Jurlsdletlm of the city vl 'I PORTIOfi ®D0. 6•Ul rr11B'Der J 9wthlaks, am Count'running r0. 00 I.nd..Lli be r emded Y W STASI Or TETAS `.d r 3/S 6P L__l_ o d Deed Rmard.d Tarrant Comity or Gntm G®y.11..1.1.1.4.Tore. Bohm m, psema seamy PoN4 1e LOT C701I.18 PANE I g = I 1 Iri t N 5EOI'OP••-IDY.00 � ••1-_-�._ Z EamulW Wi_dq of 10..Ip01. end for the Ell d Tone on d[swill L40. Mum to eery is M CAB.A,6UCE II I. - I I 6•Ulf .Ai �, sup er@ed la tee foregoing instrument d PAT.GT. N. promo non come I. I m ealmr.ct b ma that he emroeed the some m l Daety InaY.ttl n Ill.i I J I�16•mac 6 v... I 1/ er CAR�tall.IBD. lW c! sod deed f meld mPamuwn, and for 1e. IatoPme and mmldmatlov them.anums . III B'U.L I m Glass under my here coed ...1 of oNlm this-des d a. i I +G19pl ____-_-JOg g b•Us�t1I• Ie 0 LL\ 16'111A6f.•U.N. 1] ••. I • ta1/ ` NOtary Peb00 la and for The f0.1 of Tara. Les. I ri Co�lmle.MO.. COMM1 PAIR I Q++ m I r a P.111it00P NO.1511 ADDITION \ - tl8.L•81IDE I I J I i CAe.A.WTI 10U PATD.T. �t $ N tI. P1T.eT. I NPTTS: "1 I . li�ve0.on Boallo�contained Wilt.Wit w right to:.4 tt�a mum. l� U I ^--'T mown am hued.No mac amrwnt Nimmons nr.Pmle.l Um _____J� a 1 g I t Na e alum may Wmaembenyeet to mhml mom�Yn flan Manal Iota. iron. I Ira .1 tl rea I I E `- `�eLn°"m ad a emhad,tht-1 vaa.• hand.. Fawn Jmi�l-.road IEfa8J.OA@ 10t0In I x er I I 10.E-,J �' .NkoarE of atrium m!bvudiw F!mI4 f3t1RLOTfO G32•d0aftl MIN I HI a ILP "-1 h-6•08 01 lbw arum.d a0 comer late EMU p o7lao eight Ia7.olm ta eso droor VOL 01IE.PG 0?? I I m W Oty 9npm.Ylo Gahmla D82.GT. - 1 t �n(O.tqR 9) . WI 1 to.TmAN1A MM. I I O (�NM.) 1 TTGT PAT TO FULD II(CAD_.0U06 �/�L//� `1G) I !AAA _IRS -I -_ -1-1��IlC '7-" N�aera� ,Id • nLe.pR Ira �/ IL_ 'p S E f� 13 1999 9B4W 1T.,3; �. 9 .1 _FI Ir G_H-LAND S T. ( F M 3 0 3 4 )T A MAT'R01101C I �- �� Ea F. THROOP NO.T 1511 ADDITION 13 I 1 Ld003. 1 ralmDA VOL 0*PG IN I TOL/0ee,PC.I?f D3LT.GT. I AN TRACT N TO T10 CRT OP BOITTT.71 TREAT,tORIATm Of T16 F. 096 0P LANTET. T ABSTRACT N0.t611a MEMOIR fOUMT.TILL!DM COMM.10AOB AGV.9 0y Gap. lZ]i' URNS If R0000A5E3.INC. 01111ER MOTO=1'001.33.11L AIM 0.911I0113 CARROLL IdD. DAM 6/19/. I911 R.CARROIL a..am.m. .�.m.dam manm.,s_,aa.,m (OUTMA1STRuTl092 #99097A City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT March 31, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-008 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-333 /Second Reading/ Rezoning-Tract 3D,J. J. Freshour Survey., Abstract No. 521 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy,Interim Planning Director, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 3D situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 5.03 acres. PURPOSE: Zoning approval required prior to development. LOCATION: 2750 Florence Road being on the south side- of Florence Road approximately 360' east of Brewer Road. OWNER/APPLICANT: Sreekumaran K. Nair CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential and 100-Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Nineteen(19) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: March 9, 2000; Approved (6-0). COUNCIL ACTION: March21, 2000; Approved(5-0) First Reading on consent. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review.by Staff. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-008Z.doc 1C -I City of Southlake, Texas • Tract Map . ZA00-008 . . 11J i 7: o .� F;OR�CE J 13E1 .. NG 1_.\ II 1 -.n Ill _ \IIII , •...z,..a m , HI Par -4:l._11■ ME ; {: . �:\ FOP: i-i- . .1.1,./ '- --. : 0—:. • ,..2(_ ,.,., .- ,71) _ .- IMP OM- WIN ek Ai 1 Ye z . --711V-1--- II- ' - ''',.\1-..::',P#'• el.g--- --E \ \ 2000 0 2000 Feet N A,7- W / � E S '7C-Z City of Southlake, Texas Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-008 FLORENCE . _ I6 8 II 1 _ M :2 I10 1-` 3 n , MI 11 32. Zit _ _- * 012 HI MI- 13 I I4 8 II -L----- -1 11 - I-IILLIM +R: 2016 14 I r-; C .1 + 16IL ; - 1I MEM , i-- ap _ . _-BR] . _ MID. . INTI ,, .10 INS ON Mi l - T \__ 1 ,,,,..,_ I I 1 1 1 '\ Property Owners Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage 1. T.Ketchem 1. "SF-1B" 1. Medium Density Residentiall. 1.599 acres 2. B. Bland 2. "SF-1B" , 2. Medium Density Residential2. 1.000 acres 3. B. Bland 3. "SF-1B" 3. Medium Density Residential3. 1.386 acres 4. City of Southlake 4. "CS" 4. Public/Semi-Public 4. 5.000 acres 5. J.Harrington 5. "AG" 5. Low Density Residential 5. 5.000 acres 6. O. Sconyers 6. "AG" 6. Low Density Residential 6. 1.000 acres 7. Newcastle Properties LLC 7. "AG" 7. Low Density Residential 7. 1.82 acres 8. A. Wells 8. "AG" 8. Low Density Residential 8. 1.72 acres 9. K. Thorne 9. "AG" 9. Low Density Residential 9. 0.42 acres 10. T. Casillas 10. "AG" 10.Low Density Residential 10. ,1.39 acres 11. Wells Construction Co.Inc 11. "AG" 11.Low Density Residential 11. 0.66 acres 12. H. Logan 12. "AG" 12.Low Density Residential 12. 0.50 acres 13. D.Kelly 13. "AG" 13. Low Density Residential 13. 1.00 acres 14. Fred Joyce-Mary Myers 14. "SF-20A" 14.Medium Density Residential 14. 0.686 acres Ent. Inc. 15. R. Duke 15. "SF-20A" 15.Medium Density Residential 15. 0.468 acres 16. K. Burghart 16. "SF-20A" 16.Medium Density Residential 16. 0.703 acres 17. W.Roepka 17. "SF-20A" 17. Medium Density Residential 17. 0.485 acres 18.D. Brown 18. "SF-20A" 18.Medium Density Residential 18. 0.459 acres 19. G. Clark 19. "SF-20A" 19.Medium Density Residential 19. 0.459 acres 20. C. Owens 20. "SF-20A" 20.Medium Density Residential 20. 0.628 acres \\SLKSV4001\Local\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-008Z.doc ?C-3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-333 V AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3D SITUATED IN THE J.J.FRESHOUR SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 521,AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.03 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; V CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING - - ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;-PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A.PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS; pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and ' WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\48D-333.DOC Page 1 PrV District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water,,sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, - WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes,that the public demands them,that the public interest clearly N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-333.DOC" Page 2 requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air,'prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 3D situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, and being N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\460-333.DOC Page 3 approximately 5.03 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from"AG"Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All.existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to,lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-333.DOC Page 4 ^ -7 PFIF SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or`refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any,of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each, offense. Each day that a.violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING1480-333.DOC Page 5 7C -S SECTION 9: The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place-for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City 'newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY • N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-333.DOC Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: • EFFECTIVE: N:ICOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING1480-333.DOC Page 7 • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING A 5.03 ACRE TRACT IN THE J. J. FRESHOUR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 521, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. AND BEING THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 10 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TOHARVEY FORNHOF, AND WIFE, KATHY FORNHF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 8196, PAGE 1692; OF THE DEED:RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY,:TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS, FOLLOWS: BEGINNING:AT A FOUND '1/2 INCH STEEL ROD IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID J. J. FRESHOUR SURVEY AND AN THE CENTER .OF FLORENCE ROAD, AND IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A 1.0 ACRE TRACT.AS DEEDED TO .OPAL V. CONYERS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 12069, PAGE 1309, OF THE DEED•RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THEN S0113'45"E ALONG THE WEST`LINE OF SAID 1.0 ACRE TRACT, 1391.21 FEET TO, A FOUND PIPE IN NE NORTH LINE OF LOT 10, BLOCK,2, OF RIDGEWOOD II; THEN S8910'127W ALONG NE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 10, 159.35 FEET TO A FOUND' 60D NAIL 'IN THE:NORTH LINE OF LOT 9, IN SAID BLOCK 2; • THEN N00'20'21"W LEAVING SAID NORTH UNE, 1393.50 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2 INCH STEEL ROD IN THE, CENTER OF SAID FLORENCE ROAD;. THEN N90'00'O0 E ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, 159.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND • CONTAINING 5:03 ACRES OR 219225 SQUARE FEET OF LAND. • • • N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDINGl480-333.DOC Page 8 Ic- ( City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT March 31, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-011 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-334/Second Reading/ Rezoning- Tract 2B,T. M. Hood Survey., Abstract No. 706 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Interim Planning Director, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 2B, situated in the T. M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being approximately 5.358 acres. PURPOSE: Zoning approval required prior to development. ' LOCATION: On the west side of Shady Oaks Drive approximately 360' south of Ravenaux Drive. OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Kenneth and Lorrie Hill CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Seventeen (17) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: March 9, 2000; Approved (6-0). COUNCIL ACTION: March 21, 2000; Approved(5-0) First Reading on consent. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "RE" Residential Estate District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\Z000cases\00-011 Z.doc � 0- I City of Southlake, Texas Tract Map . �0-011 . DOVE_ Ell ft-Th -----\ \ r-- ;_-r-r L'HE�§A\T�--,.�-_1 IB-R Yti-- — 61 L I �. ± I I I ire \ - G1A_ S GARI1N j T r- r Laufk � - C.:,:' 17-1-1ETTrii-.)1,__ ,\,, ,LP_LAILTATIbK..rys_ 8 __Iiiii-.) -0 \--.7\• iri? - ,,/ -•-\ ,---1 \ LL • / + oAK O --- /. t _141 • il-/.--.... - � R `' T �N i ' 1 / ' ". '-'--. ) • J - .1\>'''.•:,/,7 (,,!-/:..‘: ‘,.. - .el -L11L'-\ H1NM ---1 - =- -= ii__, HIGHLAND . ,z ' -.. li fi _ r - __ 1 I ..\/.\‘s'k•A 1 /\__ .-..'",.,...., gj O/'/ /fk I / �--� / / _ al % --, �} ���R(p,VIS� cn �r . q:: °.f..f.; -----c--- )--\111 1- \c„I__L__ - , .:_ ,\--..- Pill\?/,/ L<\;i_i/r-- 1)/ s- c {..I Imo, CIg F-- I //I_\. __ - 2000 0 2000 Feet N A/_ �W / E S 16-2) Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-011 -----7\ -,_ mow Nor "-\ III . Mn OF 911111111 di Valli.liallba isormtwqm -.___ gm 4 i 1 1,if Mirip14*.ArRin I 1 . 1 1 . kviiii • I 1- I L1#1111113dl® 12 i�i� 9■E_ I ' WNW . l1° , uill I I I II Property Owners Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage 1. D. Deck 1. "SF-1A" 1. Low Density Residential 1. 2.49 acres 2. P. Salinas 2. "AG" 2. Low Density Residential 2. _0.95 acres 3. A. Sanchez 3. "AG" 3. Low Density Residential 3. 0.50 acres 4. P. Salinas 4. "AG" 4. Low Density Residential 4. 0.93 acres 5. J. Phillips 5. "SF-1A" 5: Low Density Residential 5. 1.00 acres 6. D. Ahlers 6. "SF-1A" 6. Low Density Residential 6. 2.27 acres 7. B. Passmore 7. "SF-lA" 7. Low Density Residential 7. 4.70 acres 8. M. Stevens 8. "SF-1A" 8. Low Density Residential 8. 5.04 acres 9. S. Richardson 9. "SF-1A" 9. Low Density Residential 9. 5.09 acres 10. C. Willingham 10. "AG" 10. Low Density Residential 10. 1.67 acres 11. G. Stewart 11. "AG" 11. Low Density Residential 11. 0.79 acres 12. E. Shuping 12. "AG" 12. Low Density Residential 12. 1.30 acres 13. L. Dixon 13. "AG" 13. Low Density Residential 13. 1.00 acres 14. L. Dixon 14. "R-PUD" 14. Low Density Residential 14. 0.74 acres 15. W. Margozewitz 15. "R-PUD" 15. Low Density Residential 15. 1.00 acres 16. M. Hanan 16. "R-PUD" 16. Low Density Residential 16. 1.00 acres 17. J. Milner 17. "R-PUD" 17. Low Density Residential 17. 1.15 acres 18. E. Jacobson 18. "R-PUD" 18. Low Density Residential 18. 1.00 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-011Z.doc D-3 • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-334 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 2B, SITUATED IN THE T. M. HOOD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 706, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.358 ACRES,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "RE" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY • FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • • WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480.334.DOC Page 1 1 D-L • District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes,that the public demands them,that'the public interest clearly N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-334.DOC Page 2 • • requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision • of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. - NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 2B, situated in the T. M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and being N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IWP-FILESIZBAIPENDING1480-334.DOC Page 3 • 1 to approximately 5.358 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A" from"AG"Agricultural District to "RE" Single Family Residential Estate District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning. Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. ' N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-334.DOC Page 4 161 • SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-334.DOC Page 5 Q SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTIWP-F1LES1ZBAIPENDING1480-334.DOC Page 6 1(J-q PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILESIZBA\PENDING1480-334.D0C Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" UWN1 ttM c jTli' 1uA-1'G STATE 'OF TEXAS 4 COUNTY OF TARRANTQ THAT WHEREAS, KENNETH WAYNE HILL AND LORRIE ELAINE HILL, are the owner ' s of a tract in the Thomas M. Hood Survey Abstract No. 706 situated in the City of Southiake, Tarrant County, Texas , as described in a deed recorded in Volume 13081 , Page 409, Deed Records , Tarrant County, Texas , and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows ; BEGINNING at a 1/2" capped iron found at the Northeast corner of of Lot . 34 , Block 3 , Coventry Manor , Phase II , an addition to the. City of Southiake, Tarrant County, . Texas as shown on a plat recorded in Cabinet A`, Slide 3320, Plat Records , Tarrant County, Texas, said point being the Northwest corner of the herin described tract; THENCE ' S. 890-26 ' -38" E. 667 .01 feet along the south line of • a tract described in a deed of record in Volume 5169, Page 553, Deed Records , Tarrant County, Texas ,to a 1/2" iron found, .in the west line of Shady Oaks Drive for the Northeast corner of the herein described tract ; THENCE S . 00-45 ' -54" W. 350 . 53 feet along the west line of Shady Oaks Drive>. to a 1/2" iron found in same for the Southeast corner of, the herein described tract; THENCE N. 890-25 ' -36"W. 666 . 71 feet along the north line of a tract described in a deed recorded in Volume 11036 , Page 2312 , to a i/2" iron found in the east line of Lot 6 , Block 3, of Coventry Manor, Phase II , above referenced; THENCE N. 10-07 ' -16" E. 218 .70 feet along the east line of Block • 3 , to a 1/2" iron found in same; THENCE ' N. 00-02 ' -41 " E. 131 . 64 feet continuing along the east line' of said Block 3 , to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 5 . 358 +/- acres . N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-334.DOC Page 8 lb- l1 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT March 31, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 99-138 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-326/2" Reading/Rezoning/ Tract 20,R. D. Price Survey,Abstract No. 992 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Interim Planning Director, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning on property legally described as Tract 20 situated in the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract 992, and being approximately 2 acres. PURPOSE: Zoning approval required prior to development. LOCATION: 4001 T. W. King Road being on the east side of T. W. King Road approximately 1,200' south of West Bob Jones Road. OWNER: Linnia Johnson APPLICANT: Linnie McAdams CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District AMENDED REQUESTED ZONING: Western portion: "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District Eastern portion: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District (see attached letter from the applicant) LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Four(4) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received from within the 200' notification area: • William E. Lamoreaux, 6967 Blackwood Drive, Dallas, TX in favor. (Received January 4, 2000.) • Southlake/Solana, Ltd., 2108 Hurd Drive, Suite 200, Irving, TX in favor. (Received January 6, 2000.) P&Z ACTION: January 6, 2000; Approved(6-1). COUNCIL ACTION: January 18, 2000; Approved(7-0) First Reading on consent. 7E-I • City of Southlake, Texas February 1, 2000; Approved(7-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the March 7, 2000, City Council meeting. March 7, 2000; Approved(7-0) on consent to table at the applicant's request and to continue the Public Hearing to the April 4,2000, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF1-A" and "SF-1B" Single Family Residential Districts does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff The Development Regulations for these zoning districts require a minimum lot area of 43,560 square feet(1.00 acre). Any subdivision plats submitted for this property must comply with the lot area requirements and proposed lot lines must follow the zoning district boundaries. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\99CASES\99-138Z.doc March 29, 2000 TO: City of Southlake Planning Department FROM: Linnie McAdams for Linnia Johnson a3° 74/ (4144- SUBJECT: Zoning Request Amendment Regarding the request to rezone the tract of land, owned by Linnia Johnson and located at 4001 T. W. King Road, I request that the eastern portion of the property be zoned SF 1A. The western portion of the property should proceed with the initially requested zoning. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. REG'D MAR 2 9 2000 1E..3 • City of Southlake, Texas Tract Map ZA99-138 . v__ , ,,‘, _r -,/ ,,, i_ / \ /.../ w.;./7 \- ,__. . „ T_ .,':.:$/..'• --) -------- /--=':',-..:L. ---....._ / IT L f ' ' . .,, __ QB JON---_ -j L , T 1 --; - :- .. . \..........._. ,,, . . / \ V y t-, . " ,,, ( v.,. 7 7,_ .„.•_,_ \ . " \ 1----" _ ,,,,.. 1� 0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles N \ / W / E S 1�-L1 City of Southlake, Texas Surrounding Property Owners ZA99-138 OB JONF5 L 11 6-1 2 r4 3 Property Owner Zoning Land Use Designation 1. Southlake-Solana Ltd. 1. "AG" 1. Low Density Residential 2. Southlake-Solana Ltd. 2. "AG" 2. Low Density Residential 3. W. Lamoreaux 3. "AG" 3. Low Density Residential 4. W. Lamoreaux 4. "AG" 4. Low Density Residential 5. R. Savage 5. "AG" 5. Low Density Residential 6. City of Southlake 6. "CS" 6. Public/Semi-Public N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\99Exhibits\99138Z.doc r1C 5 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-326 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS-THE-WESTERNMOST PORTION OF-TRACT 20,. SITUATED- IN THE RD. PRICE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO: '992, BEING,.-_APPROXIMATELY :1249 ACRES;MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT."A".FROM-"AG"AGRICULTURAL'DISTRICT TO "SF-1B".SINGLE-.FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DI.STRICT,,AND THE EASTERNMOST PORTION OF TRACT-20 SITUATED IN THE II. co. PRICE SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO.992; BEING APPROXIMATELY .0.841 ACRES, MORE ,FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN,EXHIBIT"B" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT1WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-326.DOC Page 1 lw �� r CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-326 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS.THE WESTERNMOST PORTION OF TRACT 20 SITUATED 'IN THE R. D. PRICE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 992, BEING, APPROXIMATELY 1.249 ACRES,MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"FROM;"AG"`AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1B" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-DISTRICT, AND THE EASTERNMOST PORTION OF TRACT 20 SITUATED IN THE.R:D..PRICK SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 992; BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.841 ACRES, MORE. FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN'EXHIBIT"B" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-326.DOC Page 1 rig-7 buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-326.D0C Page 2 • view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes,that the public demands them,that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large,the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-326.D0C Page 3 nE_n Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being legally described as=the westernmost portion of.Tract 20,situated in:the D. Price Survey; Abstract No :992;.being:approximately 1 249 acres,more fully-and completely-described'in°Exhibit "A" from "AG"Agricultural District to."SF Single Family Residential°District, and the easterrimostportion of Tract:20,situated in-'the R: D: Price Survey,Abstract No: 992,beings approximately.0.841,acres,more fully and completely described in.Exhibit."B from"AG" Agricultural.:District to "SF-1°A"Single,Family Residential District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILESIZBA\PENDING\480-326.DOC Page 4 • sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and,shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and,provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\4S0_-326.DOC Page 5 16-ll zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. - SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-326.DOC Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of ,2000. • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: N:ICOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-326.DOC Page 7 1E-13 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION-PROPOSED SF-1B ZONING RErNG a l-249 acne tract of land in the R.D. Price Survey,Abstract No. 992,situated in the City of Cot thialke,Dent'n� nounty,Texas and being a.portion of that tract conveyed to Linnie Johnson by deed recorded in •olume 373,Page 195 of the Deed Records of PPntnn County;Texas erlf r\d-+T) ]1...:...-mere particularly described bed s follows: tLJ14..do 1)U.UU being mere jia t*v�Uw j �svuwLvvv as follows: .tij uJNNINNG at a?.K.Nail set in asphalt in T.W.King Road,said P.K.Nail being N 88'14'47" E,21 ;.89 feet from the apparent southwest corner of said Price Survey,said P.K. Nail also being the southeast corner of a tract conveyed to the City of Southiake by deed recorded under Denton County Clerk's File No. 95-R0066058,said P.K.Nail also being on the north line of a tract conveyed to William Lamoreaux III, et al,by deed recorded in Volume 4298, Page 1766 DRDCT; THENCE N n7°21'32"E in T_W,King Road and alone the east line of said City of Southlake tract a distance of 299.66 feet to a P.K.wit in asphalt found said P,K,Nail also being the most MMV�u .W.vv ) V99 westerly eoutl.we t corner conveyed Sou thiakoleolana t tdi deed r nTfded�under t1 NplV1 L' uV NWI�•VaT, V�/�14V1 of a tract conveyed VM to v.�..uw... ..,r. •by Denton County Clerk's File.No.93-;0012749; THENCE N 88°16.'52"E departing'LW..King Twat'and the east line of said City of Southla kc tract and along a south line of said Southiake/Solana,Ltd.tract,a distance of 251.77 7 feet to a capped 1/2"iron pia set; THENCE S 00°12'37"E departing the south line of said Southiake/Solana,Ltd. tract,a distance of 215.20 feet to a capped 112" iron pin set,said iron pin also being on the said north line of the said i.anioreaux,et al;tract; THENCE S 89°47'23"W along the north line ofsaidl Lar orem/x et at,tract, a distance of • 267 10 f et the Feint of Beginning cad containing 5d 417 square feet or 1.749 acres 6f la_nd LV 1.L V LW.L to Feint WA.. r ,. �.�.... , liiOIC Of less. N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ORDINANCES\CASES\480-326.DOC Page 8 1C-14 EXHIBIT"B" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION-PROPOSED SF-lA ZONING BE NI;a 0.841 acre tract of land in the R.D.Price Survey, Abstract No. 992, situated in the City ofSoutl,lal a Denton County Texas and being a portion of that tract conveyed to Linnie Johnson VVYYY!•.1V,r.rVYa.•. vv...�./, portion .1 d Volume 373,Page 195 of the Deedd Records of Denton County,Texas by deed LVVVa YMY in Volume Page (DriDUCT)and being more particularly described as follows: 'V Nail being T.W. .K MENCiNG at a X.K.Nail set in asphalt in 1. .King Road,said .N AT ail N 88°14'47"E,213.89 feet from the apparent southwest corner of said Price Survey,said P.'. Nail also being the southeast corner of a tract conveyed to the City of Souihia se by deed recorded under Denton County Clerk's File No.95-R0066U58,said P.K.Nail also being on the north line of a tract:conveyed to William Lamoreaux III,et al,by deed recorded in Volume 4298, Page 1766 DRDCT; THENCE N 89°47'23"E along the north line of said Lamoreaux,et al, tract,a distance of 261.10 feet to a capped 1/2"iron pin set at the Point of Beginning of the herein desc ibe iri.rt• herein YV..v..Y ��•.•..•, 00°12'37" distance 21 S 20 feet to a capped 1/7"Lrpn pin set,said iron pin THENCE N Vv ;t•d i W,a wa►YaavV ofr.✓.ra. capped — — r line of Southlake/Solana T td deed recorded under also being on a south Ui;G a tract conveyed to uvY.tlaw.w uv.w.w,., byDenton County Clerk's File No. 9 o R0012749; THENCE N 88"i 1'57" B along the said south line of said Southlake/Solaria,Ltd.tact,a distance of 168.19 feet to a fence corner post found; THENCE S 00°18'30"E along a west line of said Southlake/Solana,Ltd.tract,a distance of 219.87 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found,said iron pin also being on the said north line of said amoreanx,et al,tract;' THENCE S 89°47'23"W along the north line of said Lamoreauc;et al,tract,a distance of 7 G8 5O feet the.Point of Beginning and containing 36i 614 square feet or 0 841 acres of land; ' l VO.JV,IGGI to the. aJVbatlfYa��,WlY �v,v. ..-1-.�- more or less: ' r N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-326.DOC Page 9 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT March 31, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-004 PROJECT: Site Plan -ISIS Papyrus STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for ISIS Papyrus, on property legally described as Lot 10, Block A, Southlake Bank Place, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 4546 and 4547, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 4.892 acres. PURPOSE: Site Plan required prior to building permit in Overlay Corridor. LOCATION: 343 Bank Street being on the east side of Bank Street approximately 450' south of East Southlake Boulevard (F. M. 1709). OWNER: Osiris Properties, Inc. APPLICANT: G. L. Barron Construction CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District i LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received from within the 200' notification area: • Robin K. Barron, Building on Faith, Ltd., 300 Bank Street, Southlake, TX, in favor, "The appearance of the proposed structure and, plan would enhance the Southlake Business Community, if plan stays 'as is.'" (Received March 27,2000.) P&Z ACTION: March 23, 2000; Approved(5-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 17, 2000, with the following amendments: • Waiving Item #1.a (articulation) and allowing as submitted; • Waiving Item #1.b (membrane-type roofing); • Waiving Item #2.a (bufferyards along perimeter); • Waiving Item #3.a (minimum 100'driveway spacing); • Waiving Item#3.c (minimum 100' throat depth) and acknowledging the applicant's willingness to eliminate the two west spaces on the south side of the southern-most entry drive on Bank Street and one space on the north side of the southern-most entry on Bank Street and to eliminate one space on either side of the northern-most entry on Bank Street; • Acknowledging the applicant's willingness to have the City consider the tower as a sign and to have them bring it forward as a variance to the 1F— ( City of Southlake, Texas Sign Ordinance and obtain City Council approval and this Site Plan would not be permitted without that agreement, and • Requiring the applicant to bring pictures to City Council of facilities in Austria and Singapore to help justify the covered entrance and encouraging the applicant to relocate the covering behind the building and maybe do something else with the front of the building. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 , dated March 17, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-004SP.doc thiawe,C Texas M Tract MaP ZA004)°4 . .. _.,., ---,,, ..._. ,f \a us . .- - . ----r--- ---\ -:: • _ , ii ---- 13, ni\IV'- , V 200° feet -- • ---\- o 200 N . S City of Southlake, Texas Surrounding Property Owners . --.4 t ZA00-004 ink Mrir1.11•11 111 4 6 41 14 - VI% .III ,,,,- dm mei al iiiCity of Illui Grapevine 1.111 wpm 77 1 _ . I 1 Property Owners Zoning Land Use Description Acreage 1. R.Pack " 1. "I-1" 1. Retail Commercial 1. 3.35 acres 2. Gateway Properties JV 2. "C-3" 2. Retail Commercial 2. 0.84 acres 3. KC Development Corp. 3. "C-3" 3. Retail Commercial 3. 0.97 acres 4. Gateway Properties JV 4. "C-3" 4. Retail Commercial 4. 1.30 acres 5. Texas National Bank Southlake 5. "C-3" 5. Retail Commercial 5. 1.84 acres 6. Gateway Properties JV 6. "C-3" 6. Retail Commercial 6. 2.00 acres 7. Gateway Properties JV 7. "C-3" 7. Retail Commercial 7. 1.10 acres 8. Gateway Properties JV 8. "C-3" 8. Retail Commercial 8. 1.10 acres 9. Gateway Properties JV 9. "C-3" 9. Retail Commercial 9. 1.66 acres 10.Lake Properties Development 10."C-3" 10.Industrial 10.0.55 acres 11.Darr Equipment Operationg Co 11."I-1" 11.Industrial 11. 1.26 acres 12.Darr Equipment Operationg Co 12."I-1" 12.Industrial 12. 1.26 acres 13.Building on Faith Ltd. 13."I-1" 13.Industrial 13. 1.60 acres 14.F.Dale 14."I-1" 14.Industrial 14. 1.58 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-004SP.doc �r. Fax G L Barron Construction Phone 817.735.6104 Fax 517.738,6135 To: Lisa Sudbury, City of Southlake Planning Department From: Scott Martsoif Date: February 17, 2000 Fax: 817.488,9370 Re: ISIS Papyrus CC: Greg Barron Lisa: met with the owner's yesterday and have been given the following directions. They want to proceed with a variance request for the following items: 1. Move the bufferyard to the fire lane curb at the north and east sides just as we have discussed in the past. They want to provide a bufferyard at the west and south property lines, however, do not want to be restricted to planting in the 5' & 10' zones. They would prefer to plant the required plants in the area between the street and parking!drive area. 2. They want to proceed with the parking arrangement as shown on the latest. submittal package. This being a 35' distance between Bank Street and the bisecting drive( 100' is required by ordinance ). 3. They want to proceed with the use of a membrane structure at the main building as shown in the submittal package. This is a signature item for their corporation. (requesting a variance ) 4. They want to proceed with the arcade walls as shown in the submittal package. We believe that the arcade provides a significant amount of horizontal relief. ( requesting a variance ) 5. They want to go forward with the siting of the sculptural tower. The exact form and materials are unknown until an artist is commissioned. The owner intent to abide by City of Southlake's ordinances. (height restrictions, articulation requirements, structural integrity, etc. ) REC'D FEB 16 2000 'd 8000-008-L18 3tos4.1e14 44OO9 • dSI :£0 00 91 qa,. City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 00-004 Review No: Three Date of Review: 3/17/2000 Project Name: Site Plan—ISIS Papyrus, Southlake Bank Place Addition, 4.892 acres APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Osiris Properties, Inc. Scott Marsolf 5505 Normandy Drive 4200 West Vickery Suite 110 Colleyville, TX 76034 Fort Worth, TX 76107 Phone: (817) 416-2345 Phone: (817) 783-6104 Fax: Attn. A. Puncher Fax: (817) 738-6135 Attn. S Martsolf CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 03/06/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. • General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comment No. 1. Residential Adjacency N None Building Articulation Y See Comment No. 1. Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y See Comment No.2 Interior Landscape Y See Comments No. 2 Driveways Y See Comments No. 3 Lighting Y Note indicates compliance. The 50' tower shown northeast of the main building A is not a part of this site plan. It must be processed as a sign. 1. The following changes are needed regarding the architectural renderings or elevations of the proposed structures: a. Articulation is as shown on the attached summary charts. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action 3/23/00: Waiving articulation and allowing as submitted.) b. In the corridor overlay, membrane-type roofs, visible from adjacent public right-of-way, are prohibited. This plan proposes a membrane-type roof on the primary building as well as on the covered walkways. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action 3/23/00:Allow membrane-type roof) 1 City of Southlake, Texas 2. The following changes are needed regarding landscaping and bufferyards: a. Bufferyards should be placed within and along the outer perimeter of a lot or boundary line. This plan proposes off-setting the bufferyard along the north and east property line, inside of the iexisting fire lane. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action 3/23/00: Waiving bufferyards along perimeter) b. The interior landscape chart appears to reflect the correct numbers. Remove the statement regarding: "Total,First Floor Area", as it does not apply to anything in this chart. 3. The following changes are needed regarding driveways ingressing and egressing the site according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634: a. Provide the minimum 100' spacing between the southern most on-site drive on Bank Street to the driveway shown on Lot 3, Block A, Southlake Bank Place. This plan shows a driveway approximately 85' from the next driveway on Bank, a deficiency of 15'. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action 3/23/00: Waiving 100'driveway spacing) b. Provide the minimum 100' driveway throat depths for stacking. This evaluation is based,on an estimated total number of parking spaces for the surrounding properties (200+) and total number of driveways (5). This plan proposes approximately 35' of stacking on the two proposed driveways. (Variance Requested) (P&Z Action 3/23/00: Waiving minimum 100' throat depth and acknowledging the applicant's willingness to eliminate the two west spaces on the south side of the southern-most entry drive on Bank Street and one space on the north side of the southern-most entry on Bank Street and to eliminate one space on either side of the northern-most entry on Bank Street) 4. Correct the site date chart regarding loading spaces. The combined floor areas,require one (1) 10' X 50' loading space be provided on site. Either change the label on the loading zone to 10' X 50' or provide such somewhere else on the plan. P&ZAction, March 23, 2000:Approved(S—1)subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 17, 2000, as hoted above and with the following amendments: • Acknowledging the applicant's willingness to have the City consider the tower as a.sign and to have them bring it forward as a variance to the Sign Ordinance and obtain City Council approval and this Site Plan would not be permitted without that agreement, and • Requiring the applicant to bring pictures to City Council of facilities in Austria and Singapore to help justify the covered entrance and encouraging the applicant to relocate the covering behind the building and maybe do something else with the front of the building. NOTE: Based on information provided by the applicant, the purpose of the 50' tower at the front entrance of the property is as a"Corporate Logo" or identification sculpture. The Zoning Administrator has determined that as such, it should be processed as a sign application. As it appears to exceed the limits of the sign ordinance, the applicant should seek a variance from the City Council. Please contact Chuck Bloomberg at extension 747 regarding the applications and processing of a sign variance. 2 � �'7 City of Southlake, Texas * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears,that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and requires construction standards meeting the requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,Perimeter Street Fee,Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Annemarie Puncher, Osiris Properties Inc. VIA: Scott Martsolf VIA FAX: ABOVE Greg Barron, G.L. Barron Construction, Inc. VIA FAX: 817-738-6135 N`.\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-004SP3CC.DOC 3 City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 00-004 Review No: Three Date of Review: 3/17/2000 Project Name: Site Plan—ISIS Papyrus, Southlake Bank Place Addition, 4.892 acres Building A North Wall ht. = 27 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided • Delta Okay? Max.wall length 81 °'90.: 11% No 81 40 -51% Yes Min. artic. offset 4 13 225% =Yes 4 4 0% Yes Min. artic. length 20 33 65% Yes 10 33 230% Yes South Wall ht. = 27 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length '. 81 _ . 90 : 11% No 81' 40 -51% Yes Min. artic. offset ' 4 13 225% Yes 4 ' 4 0% Yes Min. artic. length 20 33 65% Yes 10 33 230% Yes West Wall ht. = 27 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 81 78 -4% Yes 81 - 27 -67% Yes Wall does not require articulation due to 4 • 8 100% Yes length. 4 9 125% Yes East Wall ht. = 27 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 81 78 -4% Yes 81 27 -67% Yes Wall does not require articulation due to 4 8 100% Yes length. ' 4 9 125% Yes 1 City of Southlake, Texas • SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 00-004 Review No: Three Date of'Review: 3/17/2000 Project Name: Site Plan—ISIS Papyrus, Southlake Bank Place Addition, 4.892 acres • Buildings B & C Side Wall ht. = 11 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length - 33 _ ' 48 • 45%, .No 33 30 -9% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Min. antic. length 8 19 138% Yes . ' 8 • T6 • -25% No End Building'B Wall ht. = I I. • Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length • 33 65 .97% ., No ` •== 33 65 _,97:% No Min. antic. offset 2 0 -100% No 2 ` " 0 100% No • Min. artic. length 8 • " , 0 , -100% No 8 0" . :'l00%0. - No Entrance&End Wall ht. _ , 11 for Buildings B&C Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay'? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 33 23 -30% Yes 33 23 -30% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 ' 2 0% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Min. artic. length 6 19 217% Yes 6 19 217% Yes • • , . ,•,'1.s '•.i -:'- .. SUMMARY CHART-BUFFERYARDS SUMMARY CHART-INTERIOR LANDSCAPE SUMMARY CHART-SITE DATA • 0-,•••-i J.1;1,..-_:.;••,, • ', - --i.,,,•.,1-. 118,0 Omopo bad ill.• MoMIMO MOOM CrOcamMa II Moo h 09.1.1=May 11=Elo..10•••Mold= EIMIC/MC C4 t=1111.02•1•1 Po= MAI RM.,.•••• Om 1.1.1 Mg KEKMORMO 11241 ' B 1 . .,. .J .,'! KM ••=0 272 M I • 14 ME Mama MAME I MOW II CI IN UM WV MEMIKEMMICII IIMCCOMMI. _ MIMO VP MOO MOM i• =IOW 46 •• VI Ole Mr 010.1MAIIETICEIGE 4MMO•211111 If ,,,-1.- •; v,,,.. u....o. .,. - - aas NA 6,. 19 46 14.4 Conori••.:31 IOW ,,..A.:1- , ... : , MOE EM IV 4.•JOE AIMMEMOI AS..CAM XECIL..11.416 MIMI, ICOUCOMMIEMO 1111.1... ° asil ' _ -•: 1.; i-T., % ,_.:, .. KM No= KM ME KM KM ME ME MICIMMEME COMM (IMMO OMM110 U•Oj 1121 Caostnietnagt mhos. V!..n.\V‘,-.'4. , , :,', 1 •: . 16 21.4.1`,4,%,.\s. iiii ME NOP! ME ME mug mow r •,. •. „,..,..,,,,, .,,,,. „.. :.--ce,Mo mloicgowerroasi nom -1111 -"".. \ \ TECOMMEMINEKE POMOSEINIMOMECOOM NOM MIME MIME ATA_ arm mare . moo vommi.yam.MO FatIAVIII.fa 76101 , ZUZ,.4,F11.,,r ..,',„`4,, .2,,• IMEMOMMIM100 smameramacrovraq roc no P.m pm 7386104 . mai cassancei Ac...fRAN MEM MEI km (11717N1-6136 I f,''''',''''.,.1:,VI:,.i'.';''''.J:..:1::'' C.. . ' Nomo110.0.16,era FONITANI PIM.. 40.44M ME -•77 \\\\ (PCUMIONICKM 'i ''. A ,n,11-40--[T1'k j 1 ' MEM ..' 1041,110F11011 I 412 NY* MOKOMMOCOMPE 1•2111,E. \ \Mill ''''CIMEIMETOM70 .11/.10MCIMMO' I 413•4"'11004. LOCATIONMAP ,--N, COIM411311001/16Smaxis.10:11111112.1) CIAM.MOM SOUR-LAKE TEXAS ___I \ COMM ROCIIKEACOMMOIMCM EAMMEMOS•4112111F , . \ 10MOOM MEG III= U3T 4R-2R-2,IRK.A \ IMMICIMMEMACIE 119 0•11 IMMICi MOM 111.1 SOUTHIAKEIMIC RACE - 21011/13111.10 MICE II 'C-3 RETAIL COMMERCIAL• NES Panyrus ....,- KIRBYS \ 10. • gl, MOOKIIMEMMICE I ^ 61 5 \ STEAK HOUSE - A i N \ 10MEIZKOMM EMEIOCOKCOMEI COMOI OM , /1<7;\ \<//1 ,...:9\771.°143:\'' 1113' DESCRIPSON: en hd N '..- ., ..,77 343 BANK STREET 1 8 ExisnylFRE LANE 1 ... 41T;$1 . A 1 --- '' '2. ---114""- --.1--'4'.'""-7----- -‘ LOT 9,BUG AK .7,7 ,.' LOT 10 BLOCK A SOURIAKE BANC RACE ADDISON g ., --21.-1 C-3...,REAL , , CORPORATE -- ' r 7 -1 "--- -\%1 \ ./ii; ,A,\ :--77 , •---.1 §1 . , . „,. . ... . HEADQUARTERS .. •.• ' -• / 1\ ..,,, . 11 i ' 1 1 L ,.....e IWO ,,...;.:\11,,, \-:, ..,.:(,F,D f'''.j5\Ihk '''. .72 -..... '%Ikt• COWIN FAEPARED 511: X017.5.WOOLF 4200151Er MOW . N. FON W01011 DL 76107 1 .. .. , ••• - ' '''1 °s' -•,:::'-''..;,'.'...i.'"'\• NI's- 1N95P‘.) .... , . ,,,., 29, P:5117)736.6104 1 '-'••• .• 9Z, • v _ ,_ •,-..••:,.. : . 6 I, / .• '.., ‘ 7'?' , <71:a. "lo.7' ' IN> F:(017)73156155 095195 05R3 F9OPERIES NC A ;Al 1 ': 'kA,.. 1 . :. NCO.W.DY OR. COUDYLLE.IX 76034 I LY,L -1-----11 ..-.' 41r % -- . .45, P:pm 416-2345 • gl •::' ' ,, • . 411111.1110111111 IIIIIMPAPPPICI -'-..: LOT B.BUC A 7'' N.1105W153=MUM SIM1:SPR90 2903 En he • 9., 'C-3=RETAIL COMMERCIAL' , • -. _lo,_ .-F.7:::,',.. --- : ',.•.•; ' --,e""1„., Ls, , ,..--- b R 1 1;,, hp--1 ,s---,- ' _-.::::'-'-:,.:lh. \N.' 7 \ '1 : g G 1‘ :',V.,C.9" .'''', '' ''.'''':'''"' 1 ' 'T4 ' s?. ..;* • '''.'L.; . ..7' r I I I'', ..-0Z- 1 ,•••Ai'zi. 1., g X.--.--'----- •'f.titthe. ,...-.:_,... . 14'.--'."--\-1,_ . ..,, . j,›,, -- LOT 7.111C A SOUTRAKE BANK RACE 7. SOMME TEXAS .... -.. f . .'Ms.'POND .,'t:-::' '" M, .'-' ' Ili 7 .\ ‘.,, •C-3=RETAIL COMMERCIAL' I I . •16 . 'x-- „de- . g" •' .!, -.§..,_,- , , ,,,....i.„.. : X , . .,:.:0:.-.- , , '..-.X. % /. • ,R \I\ . k.- '4 - 1 . --g...„--1 - ' D m - , •-- - - ,...._, . ,... ...E •C-3=RETAIL-COWERCIAL' \ • ': • ' Wil . - ' '' ' . ' 1-71 ..%- --.5 RYARDTYPE)k- , . . P II? ,-- , COMM, ...... ,'" DRNEWAY-FIE LANE 5. --=-• .0.. Tt - 1 1........1 19 \ \ /N7 ----JP I!., 9 7i7. ' J. Ir... -'•,.! '7 "11 P . . „- ,, _,,_....._ . .,., , _ 59..c. / Project No. Dote: n ...301.1111131. 11.3911V WE ... L lore,BLK 1 ;aim= IP IOW/40_1_1 9923 3/06/2000 11.1...KNRY DUNPSFel 1 1 - GRAPEVIM INDUSTRIAL PARK ewe,m si SCN33.120 Sheet NO . I OURIP51512 1 / LOT 3 BUC A SOUERIAKE BANK PIA(7 GENERAL NTES: 1.NM UGHING TO CC990924 TO ADC99137 011319ANCE**OM! ' 2.SNAGESRAU.COIARLY WITH SIGN ORDNANCE No.RNA I/r ''----- C4113 Ill SL1.1-1 LU.D.=INDUSTRIAL' r-BN°R1 SITE PIAN 3.ALL 54.14De436 TO CONFORP.170 91 U.F.C.EC.10.507 A.1 MIN= AUCOAATIC FRE SPRNOJER 595117.1. . . , 4.AU.11.ILIANG310 HAVE NM%RAPID MN WEN BOXES!WALDO. REC'D MAR 0 6 2000 . N.,.. SCAM:1.•••40'-CP MI-17-1 (1991 U.F.C.SEC.10.302 AS ADCP1H5 ZA00-004 . , • B \ ,,,:..,'z,-----:'--;..\ j capawnrowtra• - CoallitL=Thriele., i; .:_ I .;• . • , •-'..\/ • acavamnieryaftno-.-— ' . l„ ' • -- •- •!. ' - - • . ' , • . ! Ill Fatwcar.Too 70107 /-'-' "f ' --L ''' ' . . ..-ARCADE'''.'"j.--7 ' : -:-''----., , ,. ,. :1 CAFETERIA 1 I no=C3171731-6101 ( I I I I Fac 101717311-6135 _ . 7 j::::•,':.:::'f — r.. ,,=_/:, •: . ;, . .,..... . j , 111111 is lir:--if. 11 47,4 millreA - La _2111 - • .. . ,,,. _--- OFFICE OD ,•• - OFFICE N.::,: li. T 11= 4,__.= C • - .I i ' • Cil ili Si', P:ipyrLIS , 1 • - 1 __LE NA i vviii 1:-.3 Elm tilikv , . . . . . 11.0.,..:, ' .• .,-;•' 'nh.Q.L., ° ° ° ' . /- • > N• LOBBY''', ' 1 sp- . , . • a...3 -:•-•:!.....:''.-.--:,i-',.,...'::,fr.1':,',.::'::-:!..-f.:.::::.::-,,, AriCADE--: -(*. _ ', I I 1-1 1 1 L!.,..1 '-- -- 1— - 1 , :.,,::•.?kpf.pE .,...,, ." 'l - , ,-- , , , - , , if . , , ,• '.IC.. • CO HEADQUARTER. S , ••4`,,,.,• \'a (1.) FIRST FLOOR PLAN-A / SCA.E 9/3T;-1-0. T. ___•,‘ -t i -7-1Faallaa SICLCIIIE IIKNEI • I N •1.-er' X ./ „,............,..._---........,..,, 1 1 , .. X .. . NOM \\ \ 111.1101COMININCULOOMMOI PUMA / ,' lUIDIKISUM101.21.23.11.P.P......‘ ,'' ..,. ‘' \ SOUINLAKE , I/ , • WW1= • IBMS WM ,,,-MINXIca -lEFOCC 're—Y-1. itt-if 13.-0. /„ •, . l':;:;' ;'''''' ... ..,,,, . ''''''''' `'''' '' ' i ' '' '•'.: ''!''' •!:'' Alrilik ' ' '''''• '.1:' ' ' ,,.. ,--,,,,,i,,,,,. ..1.' ' i , . 1- 11 ' ..•=r „--a:-..,-, , , - Droving Idle FLOOR R.AN MO ELEVAIIONS 3:111,0 Project No Dote: \._8101EVEMB31 9V-O. ------',......:NNIZCOVA691A11_ . 9923 3/06/2000 NORTH ELEVATION Sheol No. 300 310••re -,--,___ -, RECD MAR 0 6 2000 SL2 . . e 12 e. ZA00-004 — .. . . \____------ , B 7,-, ,,----, / , ,.,. :.:-.,,,, c.......r.,—........ \k, ,..._ r,.., „,_.! ...,-„,. -„,,,_, 4,... , , . _i_, ..,.. .. .... ,....,,, , ( .... , ..:. :. c ) ,-..-..., ,,.....,.....,„: .: ',:,,..-:,;:.. •:, , . .. , ,.::. RCADE KOWA'.lam 78107 L... Dow 1617)731.61111 -',. 1 , ...: ., Fac iq 7314136 • . -7. , I , , EKI ,. I ! : njir71 t li • = i , . , . . . . . 1_'L:.i.,r.:.i'.•.•-•,,,•:•„:,.••„''A:•::„::;:-N1"'..,,;.::'..••.•-;.:-.:. .,,--..,4. ,.,,,:..,..,,....i O F-F IC.,fE.-,,,,.t,1_-,-•,-,,I.,.._=_W„,:,....i.,..- .,. - ::-,,-.r:,:r-_-•- 7' a * ' a aIC a ,•:.,.;,:.:,..,;-.,.....".-.':,.....:.,.,:- .•, •-,. , , - OFFE _ ,i-.--,,-'-i,VIali'.)l-.i:I lIIi,IIa a-II:!');•i.-C- \_II I (>D) ,i•••-I,::.i.Sv;H.,;CLE•-'-A'S,;A-'O;-1,-:D71..:.:•cR•.•?PQl,,P,=i.r-..t„:- .aj,OU E.!-,rE_•':R:i,,•-_Si. •'• • x Ti FIRST FLOOR PLAN-A. - UJ , SCAM:3132.-1.-a• , . ,- . . . r . . POEI 1110111.03P1=M11=61 M.A116.11.11.11,. ILILIXONIME WOKE 211161mm carostal . , • SCUD-LAKE AECE.WCIF TEXAS -DWI I3-0' /7-1121106 . 7 •t , -...- , -•'_-',..%>)- „....,,,-,-"---.---- '' .. 1:.''1,. :::':1::..': :'. - t}i - ..... . , „......,, , .,. =._.... . , [, ,• Droreng Tdie FLOOR PLNI AR)H.EVAKINS •si,61/11VIDONINNI 1 Project No Dole: - N._DECCWADESIM . SOUTH ELEVATION ['MEWED! 9923 3/06/2000 9CAIE:3,37-.1,17 ......,.....:FIF.S. p.m Sheet No 11.erller. .i 0 6 12 24 REC'D MAR 0 6 20C 0 SL3 . , _ ZAUO-004 • - . . B_ . ..... GEO 1VNINclimy La ICO . Fol Walk ism 76101 Ma=p1717316104 . Fac (1171731-6135 • ' . . m . 1E11 3, --I 0zgMm.>- •M1=m1i.Mliaft 11k.![!.' ',---._.:..-_-.-'..'\-.-.._. • 1D/ .9 ..:..71_-' c'''•'•,r ,y•::,_:.-:-.:,.rT:.',..,..:.,.'`L,...- I••EI 1 . OFFFI1CC •_.1...-.-• \._IPE-. /-tM .1 r O - O \.,.iC i.llI.iLAia IM MNMN—iNIaI 1 ZoLEl ii/ A--.fr1... ;---._--• HEADQUARTERS •; s:-::7- 1 11. ....... 2r-u• 1 11,4* 1 te-11. , .o...7" FIRST FLOOR PLAN-B&C SCALE:SAT-.1,17 .0. 11.1111Nti'CORM 11.01aPir./06.WM LE MGM=NE FCOME-4.121 nr.ilaR cameo.' III: IIIII • —Wm*r..-i-7.-.7: 'OCAS .. ,, ....._....---i-_--MIL:Tc•gity ,. /:.::'.:,-';''';.:11.,:;-----''''' ' :1.';!';';•":•,;:,'L, ,.!':.,' ' .'';:.' ill , . . = .7 r• • • _ •, ,....... ,, .._,,, „ „„ .-111•MUCEMMINEL IQ 4r-i r /- =WM. /i/—illtaa""m" • . . Z:1_:,. ,—IIMIEWIMIOCOMPRICILIE TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION ,.___, Waxing Tittet SCALE:3/3?-1,06 . —=CD CatIlita--. ROM FIAIMD ELEVADONS . r•.1e.. . 1 0 6 i2 2 Project No. Dote: .. M411=0151..1 9923 3/06/2000 , . . 'TYPICAL COVERED WALKWAY . Sheet No SCAM:3/32.-1,13. SL4 REGD MAR '0 6 2000 zA00-004 . . ._ . . i • T� - EXISTING FIRE LANE - - - - - \\ f° ' 13I,' -- —` .,._,EXISTING RE LANE N- - — —'— � • i I i ' .. 1.Er. I DI;O\-��.._-sEs._..':!_.-;'- ____)..,1;., _ _.'"1-.Gh, •\ i! ••j 0,' �� „ I 1 I\1 i I :J 5 \\ L ASA.,� I 'j:1 %f qD b�� - /. a uN.is--\- '6,,,, ,•\ " I;1 L : 111 I - ,I ��\_ •\ LEGEND I = W" - I i I - !_ 1 - Cr - 573 \\\ `,\ PROPOSED WATER LINES 1•. 11 - - PROPOSED WALING • \ `• '+. AND FITTINGS ''�I i''I la 1 \ PROPOSED SANITARY 1:: Ilk rp. 1 I-• e \ \+` ,\�f _A.SS— SEWER IMPROVEMENTS I--L 1 II;. :." i�'-14 e,=a \y,, LPG- 1 I - cTz..~ — 1s I .\ \`,0, -----.— EXISTING PROPERTY LINE II ( 1l 1 I —{\ / I .1, ' I I �..�\�, � `,'\\ + \•�•. --_ -. EXISTING EASEMENT LINE 1 i : I� :.1,1 N�s� _ PROPOSED mum• / \,1` \ \ - 1 °2_ \ \ ,\ " j �� 'FT - �ti • w i_I ., co." t.. •F. 5 % I �. \ �� \ �/1 �� ��I PROPO5E0 ROWG \ ' I—d'SS—II 1 xTr�� g / II II Imo(:j//,`�I 2,5 6. \••\.3O •°. • I ' i III 1-�;i �,h i (�" \mil ' 1 \ I i -,-..; lh rG4 Ix .I .�\ i Jo I I \I II ` . j i I' II I • L.' PROPOSED&ALONG l\S` I 1 I,V' •\ 3` ll CCO111..,i l PROPOSED WM. \ \ rl i �' - OBII�iii• _ ssAS ?] •,` 1 " I IA I 1'� ilk 11 r y ., ' \'`\ • 1 I 1 n eE R'OGE m 1 ___—6.55 La.— j d, rr SS .. , t IV E.(I Ha rnFfAssiaks,lnc I I I''�--�•' 6TI'--``.. !Y,� • I \I \�s \i I.Jcf.l,. �:I. I. '\J I I I I11 e,\` \e7...P...a. r+ ii 6.W 1 :v •5 ruv..i _. asSDR C.SWAM u1i O•RCR rs5e I .m.e„ 1—�i��1 l w 6, I I I I r I -�I I`✓l•,\ .,.r<11.IAR.R. n w.. I • ��'� � I 6 1 , I I �-,• 11 � i I L�_� "i ( e5'-*_� ,. i� z t \ 1 I '11 1 AGE. _`~L; / I I ! 1 i 1 i ifi 1 I .'_-.�� j I I 1 F .l.:isl- 1 i`i . i. "' ;`\ f I 1: .1 �. I 1' i�i]•If f - ..- __—__—__.___—__—_ —__—__—_—__—__ __ __—_ _— __—_—_—_ -gip--a . -- -_-__-__--f-!! \I,IRF •5/8•I, . - _ . - WATER AND SEWER PLAN - •_ G.L.BARRON -ISIS PAPYRUS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS liCC'0 MAR 0 6 2000 El HalffAssociates,Inc. OESGN R• Ilii 1 LL}En:•v0 LE NO. JGS I JLSRI 2000 II••]O-I Ia.R I P •WS-1 1 • • ` PROPOSED WALL ,‹' -- 1. ! r _-- _EXISTING FIRE LANE--_--_- `\ • - - If"i —1— 6 -'— � - _ • 66R • 1 ' ,i 1." I 6i 69 61p \ I r I 1 \ 6 _ 6i ''�z -\ LEGEND 1 ♦ • � 'Y�ydli i <<t -�'�� }�-.aA+'l `. I PROPOSED WRONG 1 • ` I j•" .TL? F' y, L fly-r,i,,,,,:•y-+�"�.•' .- y 6)1 • `,\ ® PROPOSED CONCRETE SOEt4R PROPOSED LfNi DUTY PAKYENT I I rr " - ✓T�'? / •,\ \ i s PROPOSED HEAVY DIM PAVEN NT ' r i I I M i d I •.:- ' - '•\,•\`• O 1= PROPOSE°STORY ORAN MAORALL I • L 'h 1 _�ri may. - - ,'' ' /'FF r:673. • . EMT.CONTOUR EM \ .\ —.:4— PROPOSED CONTOUR II1 I 4 R I' \ \�f EOISTRC SPOT ELEVATION /'9 I II I 3,V, 61)};K. - t\ fi P \�LJs� A 563.00 PROPOSED s0OT ELEVATON I ' VJ I. a1F. 1 `,• ATE'..#Y""l1i b..,'f�iv t \`ZC. * YAICN EIRSTwO ELEVATION '.I I 672 v \ � A®" PROPOSED TOP Of LINO ELEV. .-- 1 , [1 \?�'. I C T �w Ira' - - ..'. 6. --, \ I i I 14# : TFFG72 ; cs 'FF 673. �,,,,, \ \ 1,?,/,,, I ! II 1 2- iT • - \ �611}i 1 1 6 1 IV ``\`•\ • 1 I „I I �,.1* :":--5' 14 �69. S`9 '3f �i. ! 11 1 = • N I I Iis"rZo— - \ `\\ • I 11 IH Re"' 'FF - 671: 'FF'- 672 8� s,zs \ \ • 11 I ®� . +«''€tji, = 3h"ak F 672.80 N \ `\\ \, \ I 111 . ,, •• \ 1 ' ! 11 SPC -4v .. • 6i3�t6I I• p✓-1 �.�ttTx MIi•'tt ";,,;x, i,.�xi:.; � ms JYT T.. ;,r xE"Y� y Y' y6 L P' I I =a•o °a't, Eyq`{�;t ri,"`. , ' ''"'? Pi"-le _[r, `� d•.a 3„,v. sr" �S-y s �;,.. , ; -,.,0 I I -. rRa 1•i 1....e ``s. Ft A 61-%.r ti ''a "g::§i*J yy•. 3'"hx y 'A111--...„ .zs Y 3 ..1ifiY$4t:R fit- .6\I i, �'• 41 Ha�n'Assiates,Ina • 6}1 I I - -I I .I ( 6t- ;' I ,III '•'' !•I..I } I I_�. ;p,TS •i_-I +-�` `! 1 .I • } ® .I I. - PAVING AND GRADING PLAN G.L.BARRON-ISIS PAPYRUS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS III HalffAssociates,Inc. �'p MAR 0 B 2000 D•ESW DDYrt ° Y..,No Am,s SCALE is TLC JOS JCS N O 0' 11342T G-1 • . r, �/ EXISTING FIRE LANE ' `——--— -- =�y— , - . I;' "cox acnx— �'�'i :F ` =_ --�J� \,\ II -, 2' -- 'rI I• Iae =--e— . '39 I ,,,r — 1 I I _` —`'- ` 5 ` \y 1 61 II/ t; 1 , \\\ F111-1 Ilt�.,— _ ,L "� - III 'FF _ .>73 \\ LEGEND s. ri, I'' W � .— \\ \\ PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINES . . : F- 1.----i _______ EXISTING�u_o � � � \. E%IGTING PROPERTY LINE ! ',III"' 1,Fa, I I , i. -7;n (• 'i7`x \\\ '1\ `\f EXISTING EASEMENT LINE 1 i" .i1 II --;1 !2 I- _ - U-l.i,'I _z` V-k \: �2c 'V I II'r I ^�' �. `> • 'r"t-�!-•, , G72 --, f I \\ \_ \\ems, _�c;L,_}- ice . l I " J \ ? \\ . I.1 I •III 1 .__ "�I II, zr/^—�/7%j((' i I xF,zsq e` \• \ ' III _ �.reed(i�( // q I �—\. •\\ I r`!1 I —, s,c.e«gip , . 1 � as Q`� \ If i I `__! !I I I \. \: %� ,; I` \\6,\\ • . ;ill1 __ I,�� _ 'FF = u71 !"YIII r l+ \ \\\ \ 1 III ! --�.� • ()hislniOlufo Fr = 6t2,S \\ ,\ I � !eil.ss II - n. Ie• iS .-- r I'"-zl' I -Y" Heal aAssociates,Inc I i I �. 1a lt) 1.Z J 1 )'' r Io • ,i.' i' (-I- I'\I rEr,„.,wa. 1 I I ire ' >0 S[u+e IwaL6s: • / iet _,-9R': fiiiie. ,�._--- ----"'-:.\-.\. `;:7....r.� .. .,. II ; .-- . \ G'N e° 6'Y • a I r zE\•:,s uow c.su e�sz iwu I I 11,I- ' i I • , I I t 1 —I- .1. 11 6 '1 i 1\I s:a- - I I � I �-' I . .. DRAINAGE PLAN G.L BARRON -ISIS PAPYRUS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE.TEXAS , REC'p MAR 0 6 2000 r � HalffAssociates,Inc orEr.,iKaeErsnLL OJAS J4SN mtp I•.20' 10422 Ebel 0.I City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT March 31, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-010 PROJECT: Resolution No. 00-34 - Specific Use Permit-Rainbow Plant Sales • STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for Rainbow Plant Sales for a nursery yard/outside display of plants for retail sale per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.6 on property legally described as Tracts 1B2A and 1B2B situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, and being approximately 1.909 acres. PURPOSE: Specific Use Permit approval is required for outdoor display and sales. LOCATION: 2171 E. Southlake Boulevard being on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard (F. M. 1709) approximately 1000' west of Kimball Avenue. OWNER: Dallas Foam, Inc. r APPLICANT: Derrick Malone dba Rainbow Plant Sales CURRENT ZONING: "B-1" Business Service Park District LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial NO.NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: March 23, 2000; Approved (5-1) subject to Concept Plan Review No. 2, dated March 17, 2000, with the following amendments: • Deleting Items #1 (parking spaces);. #2 (outside storage areas must be on and all weather surface); and #3 (outside storage areas require screening); • Regarding Item #4 (details of proposed shade structure), requiring the applicant to bring pictures and details of the shade structure to City Council; • Restricting the SUP to March 15 through July 15 and September 15 through December 7; • Restricting it to bedding plants and hanging baskets not to exceed 12"; • No stacking will be permitted of the bedding plants; • Dead grass to be replaced; • Not allowing the fence as shown, but requiring the applicant to bring a picture of the honest fence to City Council so they can have a look at it City of Southlake, Texas and the applicant can convince them it is needed; • Stipulating that the SUP will expire on March 30, 2002, and • Restricting the hours of operation to 7:30 a.m. to dark seven days per week. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review No. 3, dated March 31, 2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-010SU.doc . - City of Southlake, Texas Tract Map ZA00-010 _FEF-1---) ''.. Tai _._: K_J l]''"..::j''.-, EJUG . 761111[Fi. _J;17111_W__ \ -\ss- _IA.,/_.__ s I - / L5 ' I._ G = ---, ) y 'NE .___ _ L .' r--t-- 11E (- -, _. _- f- ' -1 i LV. IN ,•4Es ix s. _f / 1---i•,:-.:_,04.1_,. r I ' L177 1 , _wm,\\AlivEsliJ• b. I . - ii._, n1>:1. — '. D IM r up i IT— I_As.:'0K1-\It CR_ kb F _ x - ,•:,.,0,/,._ _ ______ . ___) , • . _ _, ,/, u0_ •,. • _ -711LI - N V111 -i'- - 7\ - I( I ''' A I . , .1 . .1 , . . 2000 0 2000 Feet N \i'14J. ‘........_ W -- . E S 16-3 " City of Southlake, Texas Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-010 --JL'L--IL------(_L_ilL , [ ____i 1_,__,L br, sH 77 1116 111111111 SOU Al] mi I 7 — --iirt-y----,..,. _— a .1,? \:,---------____-- - ,f______ _._ 3 ,_-,,,,- .____, Property Owners Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage 1. Otr/Regency Tx Realty Holdings 1. "C-3" 1. Retail Commercial 1. 13.078 acres 2. Walmart Real Est BS Tract 2. "C-3" 2. Retail Commercial 2. 23.003 acres 3. Greenway— 1709/Eleven Partners 3. "B-1" 3. Office Commercial 3. 11.219 acres 4. Southlake Land Ltd. 4. "AG" 4. Office Commercial 4. 14.586 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\00-010SUP.doc Wholesale Grower March 27, 2000 City Council City of Southlake 1721 East Southlake Blvd., Ste.100 Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: 2171 East Southlake Blvd., Rainbow Plant Sales, Inc. Special Use Permit Application. Honorable Mayor and Council Members: We are requesting a waiver or variance as to the following compliance elements from our discussion with city staff about our submission documents: 1. We request a ten (10) percent reduction (two parking spaces) in the required number of parking spaces for the site. 2. We request a waiver of the"all-weather surfacing. Not only are traditional asphalt, concrete, etc. cost prohibitive for the temporary nature of our display and sale operations, but these materials absorb heat and reflect in back to the plant materials, killing them. We propose instead to lay down a cloth material, affixed to remain in place upon which to display the plants. We have provided photographs and additional description of this method to staff as part of documents submitted. This cloth material has worked very well in our operations in other municipalities. 3. We request waiver of any screening requirements, because the open view of the flowers and plants in their flats is the advertising of the product that has made our operations successful. In essence, the screening requirement would serve to hide the view of a greenbelt and flowers. 4. We request that shade area facilities for customers be permitted by use of a 10'x 10' shade structure consisting of a fabric framed pavilion with open sides. We have previously provided a description to staff during discussion. Thank you for your consideration, and we request that our Special Use Permit be granted with inclusion of permission to implement the above requests. Very Truly Yours, Z1-5 FED MAR 2 8 2000 6115 Garda Lane • Fort Worth, Texas 76140 • 817-572-0727 LAW OFFICES OF • MICHAEL L. GJLMORE 3010 WEST PARK ROW 817-261-4200 BOARD CERTIFIED: ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76013. RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LAW FAX.817-277-6815 COMMERICIAL REAL ESTATE LAW wikeIg(n poslinet . TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION March 10, 2000 • City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 1721 Southlake Blvd., Ste.100 Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: P & Z No.2AZia-ItD, Application for Special Use Permit, Rainbow Plant Sales, Inc., 2171 Southlake Blvd, Southlake,Texas 76092.; Gentlepersons: This letter is to provide requested information in connection with my Client's application for special use permit. The applicant is: Rainbow Plant Sales, Inc. 6115 Garcia Lane Fort Worth,Texas 76140 !;, 817-481-4575 telephone 817-481-5103 fax The owner of the property and address is: Dallas Foam, Inc. 2171 Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 817-481-5551 telephone 817-488-3590 fax REcD MAR 13 2000 . 7Crco My Client's consultant is: • Bud Scott Birk's Construction, Inc. 3055 Meddis Drive Arlington, Texas 76015 817-467-7809 817-468-3752 Rainbow Plant Sales's special use permit application looks to its business of outside plant sales. These products are only bedding plants in flats and hanging , plants. Excluded are trees, shrubs, bushes,and grass (no piles of sod etc.) These are displayed for sale at ground level. This is a seasonal business. It operates from approximately from the third week in March through the first week in July, subject to a shorter period subject to weather; and from the third week in September through not later than mid-December, again subject to shortening in respect of adverse weather. Hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. through dark seven days per week: In addition to the above, there are several specifics as to which we seek your . additional consent. They are as follows: 1. ALL WEATHER SURFACE. The typical all weather surface generates heat soak which kills the plants. We are requesting that the display area for the plants be permitted to allow a cloth ground cover over the grass area where the plants will be displayed, as more fully shown on the copies of plans being submitted in connection herewith, fixed to the ground.with "staples"so as to remain in place. , The applicant has had good success with this approach at other locations, and pictures of those locations are being submitted in connection with this mailing. One of the strengths of this approach is that when or sales and display presence ends with the season the removal of the cloth returns the area to grass greenbelt. ' 2. AVAILABLE SHADE AREA. The plan calls for a framed cloth covered pavilion with open sides 10' x 10' in dimension. The material will be alternating green and white, so as to be in visual keeping with the existing surroundings. A brochure form the manufacturer is planned for submission to you in connection with this mailing. 3. "HONESTY FENCE". We need an approach barrier to'surround the sale area, so that we may retain control of entry and exit to the sale plants. We have found that; a fence of 14 gauge welded wire with 2"x 4"openings, galvanized, is an ideal ' application. This fence will not be more than 5' in height. The fence posts will be "T posts" covered by silver colored pipe. The entry/exit point will be closed during non- operating hours with a chain. This type of barrier is nearly invisible from the road, and is felt not to visually interfere with its surroundings. At the same time, it provides some measure of control and security after hours. Page 2 16_7 • our app'oval,.an d•ttiatthe:. • • meet with y. t be granted e.above Prof at'th ti \1(e hope th ecial use Perm . application tot. - YoUs;. • • VeN Truly 1" � `J ore • �Ichaei L: Gi1m • • �Glfie • City of Southlake, Texas - CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 00-010 Review No: Three Date of Review: 3/31/00 Project Name: Concept Plan- Rainbow Plant Sales APPLICANT: CONSULTANT : Derek Malone Robert L. Scott 6115 Garcia 1909 Rock Creek Ft. Worth, TX 76140 Grand Prairie, TX 75050 Phone: (817) 572-0727 Phone:(817) 647-0832 Fax: (817) 481-5103 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 3/28/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Nursery Yards require SUP approval also,sSee comment No.4 Residential Adjacency N Building Articulation N No new construction proposed Masonry Standards N No new construction proposed Impervious Coverage N No new construction proposed Bufferyards N No new construction proposed Interior Landscape N No new construction proposed Driveways N No new construction proposed 1. Two additional parking spaces are required. (Request 10% reduction, 2 spaces) (P&Z recommendation, allow reduction) 2. All areas of outside storage must be on an all weather surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt, etc.) other than required parking areas or drive lanes. (Variance requested) (P & Z recommendation, delete) 3. All areas of outside storage require screening.The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council can consider type of screening required or waive requirements where for outside storage of living plant materials. (Variance requested) (P & Z recommendation, delete) 4. Provide details of the proposed shade structure. Membrane type roof is not permitted. (Variance requested) (P & Z recommendation, bring pictures and details to City Council) -q • City of Southlake, Texas * In granting any Specific Use Permit for outside storage,the City Council may impose such conditions as it deems necessary to insure that such storage is not visible from adjacent public rights-of-way and neighboring properties and may impose other reasonable conditions deemed necessary in order to mitigate the potential adverse impacts of outside storage. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Derek Malone N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\REV\2000\00-010CP2.doc 16-10 • • • n orwann I,aat M 94 raalto a • , SITE �% • ' :(VICINITY MAP TRACT:,182.A.and':TRACT.1B2a, •1A..EREEMAN SURVEY A,-..529. .. . ._.L.SA1nktL.AKE.:.TA9NANT..010011.,TEW; . . . SOUTHIAKE....'ULVI., -- . EXI STInT 5UILDIf G:. 11400 Sq.FT. _. ' PARKInO: REQUIREMEITS- OFFICE AREA • 945 Sq.FT.', oFPIGE_ ,I PEP-500 5q.F-T'. MAHUFAGTURIfG., . 4455 S4.FT" ' . :MAOUPACTUWLlT_''-I P.Efb_.1000 Sq.FT. I f11I I 1 'WAREHOUSE. 0000 Sq.FT. WAREHOUSE 1 PER 5000 5R..FT. 11.11 111 I FLOWER"OJTOSv1 DISPLAY '5200 Sq PT. ' ".OUTBOOR SALES.,,-I Peps boo Sq.FT. 111111E%ISTnG 00X REgIlIRGD PARK( G a 21 SPADES I IIIIII I CULVERT ADDRESS': Sill EAST SOUTHI.ARE OLVD, P2OYIOCD,.4APXIw5'.19 @PACUS :ZOD14G 8L (ZCOJ 041 A 10e(.FFEDocl10J,25f1p[45) 21 - - , \ 29J. ._IJ�II )_t_- .._- , - sir n ew.w.. ol. i. •191," 6m -lI �_2.la:.3POLe,slap , 9.� p• �^��\�\\\ -.Il��r GRPDG To34•P0999• .,,1 —d, ._ —4IHLR 1 - 4 -I-4- i ;___ 1 1-- -1 -�^r i o''MOBILE„S410050IE I.. .f'40PEF1TY.t.EO,aLf SCfiIPTpN.�' It. pl I31 f DOLES-OTSEASaf1ALl .• A - - . Qg • 'f 7.�! PERMIT(4(flEE-AJC,) ;'[M1.T IB3A �• E Q£yRa1• 1 .3� ; •1 11€ 5111 \-FLOWER DISPLAY g1 • ,,9togatm0mo0 o(4odm.Ndmlk]APnm.a Se..p,M519.TanruCwotY.Taur- mi L --J 6 SFLE5 ..-G __ I �j _ Wba.,ortie.a:u.9 ampsd to M.wY8•11i Lou Hmw h demi ma.a - J �L. �� i,t. /,psP+K:e^ri7_p.it"'al ,. d�ao 119 d.dvmb 9976 de hnoe(uo9l0a<dtmord.wdh�tmoe Pt^tmY • 3 • \\ �.F=i `/'. I -i- PERIN2TEP-'FEfIGE TO' PECAPIIND'ulb.SwNngltafa., .f;M L__ ---- d P a -tithe; • 'DE 14OA.0ALVMI2EO. Wavagy Ho IT09W599 Waa C qq rdnruq;-, ` ` XeaP..: dnee u(NI).tt an90.d09..oamo(md Nilltrm udhm4 A.mo s.% 'A'•.'00 \` `_PONPKIn 4.GHPI5TMA5I I •:WELODWIRE W)2..9'' RUe Seruhr94Nry hxefrcl F.M.10nieaYNO LIWveh 90 WmlmaFNirtl Vy w". • I ^"TReE.015PLATQ.SALES OPEIIIngs pap, • 1 F BY SEA9OPAL"PERMIT 11 ICESvO B9dgg�m I3 mun Ewe dwtWeSwhnldeN:e.,l.v yaaMFM `b s _ -PIIMPKInS CHID,SEPT.= •, ILgbaae Ha Dog.."weuo1Tl5U4w: $ • B ff • r OGT:91) di',16 OHRISTMASSREES I .iTRAGT IO2 nmX,?swlld�wmaap9we.,d9maall.dwr m ` aaCC vnm o: • .-(nov 24=DeG.2U) t1 N ut - ?I 1N...... ....15 neoupWmaGavmor270.0r mdewepbaofmldna V I 115DC91.111,4dw0VavdeaE.l.GOthe WUWaamid NA tmade..of Q -,- - ` N4nm➢4adkwama wniabW 90emaoflnd mmewlma 4f ' - - .$$' 1X0CT1500 a m y •9§, 5o4atmmpuW E.o lt.oa pS FREEMAN SNtVEY,hd19,Tamp ComY, • Tamwdhe.g.l I9 oeaf.Imrl nwt-ryNm0..wP_I1.dO.,w Xamo bydeed • f9'�P,}J{�1.11 $ • dW on Pao 119 NVoLma 1b15 Oa Tana Cw 4.13.114:*WIo4owa • • I ._ _ _._ ytrbi.dydec,IaOu(Wave 9EDV9FIIPS i.Iti Weil.ofrpd gad mo.W bvt Wm adamo(1,)II TI Fm and r So45I depm00 onion Wry Sao.0163 d impmd.Nn9odm�ro(lokf40 ITaINFA� APFLICA It S G41NSUl,TAHT: �.••FaavnraP ASP( `FRIG BU0HAl1Al1 OERRICE, MALOne • 'POBERT L.000TT P.E, MO, 1 --- —T— i 2111 SOUTHLAICE 4119 GAROIA 1901 YOGI'-'PEER THENCE Soma.9 degm B emim Eat a dw.wa NlM 0(.1, I 50JTHLAKE,TII.TUo92 FOOT f0P-T0.TX.TY,40 4RMD PftwRIG,TX.l5050 l'HENCESadll deym(0 oiwtw Waadn+rap1635&m, L_ __Mmy_ — I PA%: 811-_4BB-3590 FA%:`Bll'=4BI-.5109 511.1917.19.10.v.ldmwiu WNadto b00Eoa1h WahmMmHHu 811-481.-SS SI- Bll-Sl2-Ol2l 912-U41-0832 XOXWm 1^4 -- - - tm.' 1 im.o No.1 delta 00 raw.Eanab4.Oka 0a deut Foi 4ma dXmnM 161ddo to P:a.(b4nwB Oepau0g 10 tmj e'[am.......�( 9Jn� • , ' 'TPRACT IPi2 • _ RECD I�ii'+(a N [J ZOOO' ' SITE LAYOUT; _SFECLFIC.USE P.ERIV11T.foc';-.-90,9,T-Pw. 1 RAI1�8416L.E?LANT.-SALES. Resolution No. 00-34 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR I4INBOW PLANT-SALES FOR A NURSERY YARD/OUTSIDE DISPLAYS:OF PLANTS FOR:RETAIL SALE ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS'1B2A AND'1B2BSITUATED IN THE.JOHN A:-FREEMAN,SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.529,1 AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 1909 ACRES,MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for a:nursery yard/outside display of plants'for.retai1 sale has b.een requested by aperson or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "B-I"Bu'siness Service Park District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section, 43.6 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for outside storage of plants or other greenery'as part of a retail operation on the property being legally described as Tracts 1B2A and 1B2B.situated in the John A. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 529,,and"being approximately 1.909 acres,more fully N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\00-34.DOC Resolution No. 00-34 Page 2 and completely described in Exhibit"A", and as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions, if any, shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2000. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\00-34.DOC 1G•IS Resolution No. 00-34 • Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY':LEGAL DESCRIPTION• •TRACT 1 B2A: • ,f, Being atractor parcel of land situated.iin the;.T_A FXeeman'Survey A-529,Tarrinit County,;Texas and bein a ortion of a tract as conv yed to �. g P ey . Dr:,W: .,Nail,_i? ,s,,,,Horton,tiy aeed'r%ecorde, :7 Page 119 of Volume-2357 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being_more�particularly described as follows' BEGINNING in'the Southright-of-wuay.line'of.F.M. tir a�Lilo. 1709 and`bein Westa:; distance of 1327.77 feet from-the Northeast corner.of.said.Nait:.tract`and-being at tlie;in`tersection of the South right-of way line of'said F. M.Highway No 1:709'-with the West line'of said Nail:;'. '. tract; THENCE South 89. degrees I5'►iiinutes,East:all ng:the_�Soutl right-of ivay:lineof said:F M. Highway No. 1709'as distance of 270.0 feet 'LL1?' • - ; i. THENCE South,I degree 00 minutes West'a'distance‘of 146:64 e: ., `" J,': THENCE North 89'degrees l'5''minutes,_West,a distance:of27,Q 0;feet'to'.the,West line`oI`,5aidNail tract; 'tl, . THENCE North I.degree 00 minutes East along;the West'line of said Nail tr_act.,a-distance of. 146.64 feet to place'ofbegirming,-containing.909 acre�of:land more oc less; • TRACT 1B2B: . Being a tract or paicel'of land..situated in the T:A.,FREEMAN SUR' EY.A-529,.Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a tract as cot veyed'to'Dr, W.it Nail by Lois Horton,bydeed ,; recorded on Page 119 of Volume 2357 in tlie.Tarrant'County Dee"dRecords:and;being more; :,,. particularly described as'f . . ; BEGINNING in the I est line of aid `s.'ng West,:r of..., .=:,::,:.. W s Nait�tiact:and'•beirig�West�atlistaice oft.1:;327.'�'1:#`eef'and �. . South 1 degree,00.minutes West a distance of 162.5'.feet from the Northeast corner of said.Nail tract; ' -. , _ ,, . THENCE South 89..degrees 15 minutes Easta distance'`o 270.0;feet,' 'rr f, ,h` r THENCE South-I. degree 00"minutes West;a,distance of-.162 5fee., THENCE North 89'degree`s l5 minutes West`a distance'of 270.0 feet to the.West;line ofsaid Nail tract; . THENCE North.1 de`ree 00 minutes East along the West line ofsaid Nail tract a distance'of.'.. 162.5 feet to place of beginning,containntg,.1.0 acre of land more'or less.' '` `' N:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\WP-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\00-34.DOC r161-14, 1 11)ag 0 (D 0 .A ' f—I- 0 • ,.mpePro.P Dona. • r. ,viOnare MAP .TRACT,182Aand.TRACT 1B2B. ..1-A.FREEMAN SURYEY.A.-523.. - . . ..SQIrrs0.AKE•TAHRAWT-GOUMT.T..TEVAS. - SOUTHLAKFC..:H11/O: EA15TIn0 OulLoln4:' . 11400 Sq.Pr- . ' rARRln4 RequIPCME@TS'�_ OFTICS AREA • 94S Sq FT OPTICS. .1 PER 30O SO PT.'. MAPIUFACTUPIl14. 4455 SSFT. •. .MAl1UTAGTUWl14.. I TER.1000 Sq.FT. WAREHOUSE . Go00 SQ.FT. WAREHOUSE I IMF,5000 5q.FT. 111111 1 I FLOATS Vows.DISPLAY'_ SL00 Sq PT. .-QITGOJR SALES • Ire.40O Sq.PT. I;IIj11 . - - - • FGquIP PWO GO r. 4•11 SPACES 11111 I OLOE 6 4ox ADOPG55: '1111'EAST SOUTH LARD 0LVD P120YlOtO YA5K1Au•19 52ACu5 II I111Ij GHLVSPT _ZONn4 02 (RGOVes•A so'(.wa0„41,0.,I.SPA(r 5) 11 I ., ^� -. . - ty2 .T_____. 1.,.-----. -— .-L.-... '-,...—,.. ". -----.. ed I�yO� • NOdLG nOAGa-... - PflOPEATY.yEW}OE6GHP/IM1 -J I .GOrIT tANE�-Au4) 1W.T MD !*CI -Ipj' jr{{"(--"---'""--1 ---' 01-- k2-- • .�.I,war,drNl.u.wiwiwOvuL,w.w�fat+mfai.p.co.' ; 6] '4 .Z1 l .. P.IISMvemrnsmor Tuiw C+v'd11looD.R.D.Pe fTl .�, 1[. M M♦:l••. rotrr6N•. LA.I • �.•'—ry�tS�-�, +�� FDRINETLP Pence-TO 111+rIMORP rPu.dNatu w�p30.6.Imo1+�IWy iY'Y.• • �' 'i•••..• • ,De"144A:.4ALVAn1 LEO ramenD12.2m.rWr m1ono pl..Oapw RD.,a rW Ar roaralos C ;TM� �' `1 Tu4fPI l�eHPIDTNAS I I =AELD20 HIP@ HI 1.4 .'TPL;D,SoLAY e.MLLS O:—...9 _ KIn 04 .91. T NCEfiau PP Dom 0 axon Pant,.lYiw Opa-•ebNW,R m -' O TPKInS tYlS 9Er1.. - @p.oU.lapm4.,mdsrop4t C-1 n '' �51s I ,- ACT 102 - Dom°"' Q 4m -, GPPI6TMA9TEL0' ,. L.pyeamur Yo.fay.wlY4 bL 4'/'' 0 . n1. � (nOV Z4-OG0.24)�f. it/t¢YI4LnhDelS ow.v.P W.ar:no W gNwaw J.,. tal 11• l Y I DORM A l u..ns.. .wm Re lwwm l . •asp.al z JRinkbwm ..w u IPa. 1.6.14.1.w..n.0wa.m.o.mW....m JJ `a y.erup„udd l 1Y 1 A T.lnLWSUFV22.A.111 mscep. 8 I WI .s Tm.WYN.m1'rmof�•mrraer.Sr40.w1MrhWI1mm01N1 `27 I • e r.pafurP OM PARA W wo.• pplsOu- m'�S.W. WHrmP.21 Wm.Y......rlAa loam; • I PP-IC,S APPLIGIIHr:, - jGQKS112TAKL: amt La mm1.:.t.ewln,L...�Aeemrepro!.Ar 11.4a•g011,MPO( EPIC'DDGHAl1M • DEPPILR CIA POD4T L.SLOTT I.O. nlpiTGgpmtq.w.lsu..epu.a.r.wSND 4.0•' • 2111 IOUTALARE DLVO' 1.115 4APCIA • 1901 POOR GE 50. '�� • GOUIHLAPE Tt-lso92 FORT WORT4,TO.14140 TA`n0 FPAIM1,a,Tx.riOSO Nulymmra.Yr...•owlusmc ------_'--_ PAY:'e1l•see-5510 .FAF.Dl1-401-910i 11p gpm m 6/.. is.•umal.tmmJ00Mm 0bam YafWM.1 a =------ - .311-961--5501 • 611-51L-0111 lz-4q-oei2.-I .. _ . ...m.mm.a.s.s.Yes Ma JrlMsm.J...a • tll sm.,.Y• IS. ... 2*(M0rWmweSP®L1poom1..`lo....n0 0*00 x ' C7 I TRACT 102' • RECO MAR 2 8 2000. SITE LAYOUT, . ._. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT for.:. o _ RAINBOW.PLANT..SALES w r b 0 n _- City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Garland Wilson,Director of Public Safety(Ext. 730) • SUBJECT: Request for a sign variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A for Rainbow Plant Sales, located at 2170 East Southlake Boulevard. Action Requested: City Council consideration of a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A for Rainbow Plant Sales, for a ground sign in lieu of a monument sign. Background Information: Rainbow Plant Sales has leased space from Dallas Foam at the subject site. They are applying for a Specific Use Permit for outside sales to display and sell bedding plants (Case No. ZA00-010). The sign ordinance. allows a business sign either as an attached sign on the building or as a monument sign. Because their business is not in the building, and a monument sign is too permanent for a temporary business,they have requested to erect a ground type sign. This would be the type of sign structure that is normally used for a real • estate sign or for a development sign. The requested sign would be two feet high by sixteen feet long, and not over five feet above the ground. Financial Considerations: Not Applicable Citizen Input/ Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None. Alternatives: The Council may approve the sign as requested, approve it subject to whatever changes or conditions they deem appropriate, or they may deny it. Supporting Documents: Sign Application Sign Ordinance Sections 14, 16-C, 19-A, 21-D &22-C 8-Feb-00 Staff Recommendation: Place the request for a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A for Rainbow Plant Sales on the April 4,2000 City Council meeting agenda for approval. •. GW/cb 7H-1 CITY OF SOL•TIILAKE.BUILDING DEPARTMENT. ;;. 667 N,CARROLL AVE.,SOUTHLAK ,TX,76092 ; PHONE:817-481-5581,FAX:917-188-5097 • uth�Ct � APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • DATE : March 10,. 2000 ADDRESS OF.;PROI.7ECT 2171 Southlake Blvd, Southlake,• Texas 76092 • PROPERTY !AMER. •Hal l RR rum,_ Inc. ADDRESS 2171 Southlake Blvd. TENANT Rainbow Plant Sales, Inc. pHONE NO. 817-481-5551. SIGN COMPANY (INSTILLER) „vim., PHONERI 7-4R1-457c • FAX NUMSER817-481-5103 AADREgS 6115 .Garcia .Lane - • CITY•Fort Worth, Texas,. ZIP 76140 _ ILLUMINATEP? US (CIRCZ,E Off) If Yes, Attach Electrical, Permit ELECTRICAL•;CONTR.ACTOR N/A PHONE NO. • TYPE SION PERMANENT SIGN TEMPORARY SIGN -TRUCTURE CATEGORY CATEGORY ATTAAdan BUSINESS - BANNER MONUMENT MENU BOARD w MODEL HOME GROUND SUB-DIV ENTRY xx SPECIAL PURPOSE OTHER DIRECTORY TEVELOPME.NT • •,_-_INSTITUTIONAL • REAL ESTATE(no fee) GASOLINE PRICING DIRECTIONAL . • SIGN AREA:H IGHT 2\ ' FT, X WIDTII 16 .F.T. AREA 17 .: . SQ. FL OVERALL HEI9'RHT 5 FL SETBACKS FROM R.O.W. 15 FT. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: a Sign Drawing Plot PIan or Slte Plan • SIGNATURE Olf APPLICANT • • w,r+ ***********b**:trex****************fir***fir*****,tit**************************************** • APPROVAL PERMIT EXP. APPLICATION APPROVED BY: DATE;, FEES: DATE: C4I1 MENTS: Past-tt'Fax Note ' 7671 Dattg10.40 Pis @► - T91/1 g i i4A4 pg E Ir°"t:SGAo.r r ete�eb CoJp`P' • ete pflut • Phono Phone* /,)7 • • Pal* ?4,- — / Fu A Jr01,� 'QQ,, ' ':j'i MAN 3 ZUUU 7.H-2 4 Ill n♦ rV rVVV i�r• ii 1 IrI r. l VI `.uV111r111V •,•• r• V.r CITY OF SoOTHLAKE February ,6, 1995 SIGN VAAxANCE AP?LICATION A 2/41ca r OWNER fif d_ffere-:t) Ra•i pnw plant Sa1 Pc, Teal • Dallas Foam. Inc. —,,•_`^ _ ADDA»SSSe , 61,14 Garcia Lane 2171 Southlake Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76140 Southlake, Texas 76092 PKOM 817 ,481-4575 . 817-481-5551 BAK; 817f�481-5103 817-488-3590 0-1O11ojj,ig LES1b w requested, .. or NUffi VESS ` " oPERArroN: on,j rbretjo ant salsas. Tee, PHYSICAL ADDRESS: -, -21 .1 -Sou�hlake.Blvd. . aouth1ake. TP 76-092 • c-a ma. t6v .539 A.Frreeman Su Vey i arran Coumi`7'"exas. . - COAL DESCRIPTION I: Lot Block Subdivision MPi•PQ & hniinda I hereby certify that this application, is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No.70Yvi s summarized below, I further understand that it is necessary to have -a representative at the Cj,ty CQtmci,l meeting who is authorized to diruuss this request, address; any unresOved issues, and approve changes, if any. ' i • . --:,,icant's SignatAr ..._'1-. . ' . . ' Date: ;<,--CS r*************ii#**! ************.**********,***********************************4* For city Use. Ottly; 2 hexeby,ac3lsowledge receipt of the sign varianca ,applioation and the appliation tee in the amount of 41 on this the day of . _ . , 199 . • signed: Title: , *****i***i****,Y+ “.*** *#*'**a**14*4**************************”:******:***********.******1** The. following cheg diet• is a summary of requirements for sign' variance. rcqueste as required by the City of Southlake. The'applicant should further refer to the Sign . Ordinance No. 506 tan amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that malls pertain to this •sign variance request. • • Complqted sign variance request application. • Compl;ifted demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (s e* ¶ttathed.) . Site.; lan'showing the location of the start variance request and any other si.gna• that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate .the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and , adjoSfing street R.D.N., scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the • sign per which the variance is requested. and any other signs that confcrm.to or asp exempt from the sign oxditseat:.•\'•. . 1-0)1E M 1. fl TIP • �� ILL'''' '' - :'"'MAR 13 2000 , - 7H-3 ict`f • ' MAR-10-2000 14:11 FROM CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO 2776815 P.03 •• Demonstration. Plum,* dem2a4tra to that the folloscing gonditioris areApplioa,02e to the Z'equers.tn? sir vari ce: .. t .4 1 , That a •11iteral enforcement of the sign regulations will create an - • unnecesejary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. • See Cover Letter. i • 2. That thq •situation causing the -unnecessary hardship or practical _.. diefi.cul{ty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed See ,Cover Letter. l 3 . That the variance will not injure .and will be wholly 3 compatible with. the use :and permitted development of adjacent properties. See Cover Letter. i 4. That th4 variance will be in harmony with( the spirit and purpose of the Sig4 ordinance. Sle Cover Letter. } G:\WP?\FORMS VAPPSISIGN VAR.n • I MAR 1 3 MU d 1a-S - TOTAL P,03 7H-4 Yti t_ -- April • LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL L.GILMORE BOARD CERTIFIED: 3010 WEST PARK ROW sip Z61azao RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LAW ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76013 FAX 817 277-681S • COMMERICIAL REAL ESTATE LAW mikelg(alusb iet TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL • • SPECIALIZATION • March 10,2000 • • City of Southlake • Building Department . • • 667 Carrot Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Attn: Chuck Bloomberg. Re: 'Rainbow Plant Sales, Inc., Application for sign variance, 2170 Southlake Blvd. . Dear Mr. Bloomberg: . • • With this letter are: • 1. Signed variance application fee, a check in the amount of$100.00. 2. Completed variance application form. . • My Client, the applicant, is leasing a portion of the subject property for seasonal outdoor plant display and sales. The existing building is set back substantially from the street as will be the plant sale and related parking operation. In the greenbelt between those things and the street my Client proposes to place a temporary•sign with 2'x 16' dimensions not more than 5' above the ground. On both sides the sign will read . "Bedding Plants.$10.60 per flat". • The sign will be erected perpendicular to the road,-so as to be visible from both directions of travel. This business is seasonal. •It operates from approximately from the third week in March to mid-June, and in any event not later than the first week in July; and again from the third week in September through the first week in December of a calendar . 'year. • • • . • • Given the short portion of the calendar year for this activity, you can see why the variance is being requested. MO,.515179 7H-5 • " . The off-building monument style of sign would be cost prohibitive, both as to construction and timely removal with the lease arrangements. The proposed sign will not prevent any view obstruction or visual departure from the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. We believe that the limited period of existence, together with the proposed : dimensions and content of the sign will be in keeping with spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. For the above stated reasons, we request that the application for variance be granted. . Very Truly Yours, . leac,,,V,a) LLP— . Micheal L. Gilmore . • • • MLG/fie • . . el - 11 T g,e..7 77-7P n . .. .. ____ r . MA .. It Cr J 1 7H-6. __;+ ......... k..... .. � rSE C. 14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance,the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self- imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. .A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. ARTICLE IV-GENERAL SIGN PROVISIONS SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS C. GROUND SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all ground signs. 2. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from any property line. 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Three feet(3') 4. MAXIMUM AREA: Eight(8)square feet with a maximum of four(4) square feet per sign face. 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1) sign per site. ARTICLE V-SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS SEC. 19 PERMANENT SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this article shall be applicable to all of the following signs. A. BUSINESS SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: None SEC. 21 TEMPORARY SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT A permit shall be required for the following signs: D. DEVELOPMENT SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE:Monument and/or ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Five(5)feet b. MAXIMUM AREA: Sixty-four (64) square feet with a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet per sign face c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)per site 7H-7 d. DURATION: Sign maybe installed at any time after the issuance of the building permit for a commercial development or approval of the developers agreement for a residential subdivision. The sign must be removed within one (1) year, or upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a commercial development and upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on seventy-five percent(75%) of the lots within the subdivision for a residential subdivision. e. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Not applicable SEC. 22 TEMPORARY SIGNS EXEMPT FROM PERMIT A permit shall not be required for the following signs: C. REAL ESTATE SIGN - 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached,monument,and/or ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MINIMUM LETTER/LOGO-HEIGHT: Not applicable b. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Five (5) feet above grade for ground signs; below roof line for attached c. MAXIMUM AREA: Sixty-four (64).square feet with a maximum_of thirty-two (32) square feet per sign face d. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)per site e. MINIMUM SETBACK: Not applicable for ground signs four(4) square feet or less per face in area 7H-8 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT March 31, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 00-030 PROJECT: Revised Site Plan - Southlake Town Square, Plase II, Lot 1, Block 10 STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: . Revised Site Plan for Southlake Town Square, Phase II, Lot 1, Block 10, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 10, Southlake Town Square, Phase II, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5261, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 2.678 acres. PURPOSE: Revise the footprint, floor area and north facade of Building 10C and add a loading area. LOCATION: On the east side of North Carroll Avenue across from Ownby Lane. OWNERS: The Fechtel Group with general partners: Alicia Marie Fechtel, Charles Joseph Fechtel, Mary Louise Logan, John Randolph Fechtel, Marguerite Elizabeth Fechtel, and James Milton Fechtel. APPLICANT: Cooper & Stebbins, L.P. CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses including a U.S. Post Office and associated outside storage. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: March 23, 2000; Approved(5-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated March 17, 2000. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated March 17,2000. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2000cases\00-030SP.doc thialo,Texas city ot s°" wiap -tract V4043° \ _ ,---- ____L---- ' (.-\ \---3 ---- ,-, Wigua Ar--)E- ---- -zir--, j., -*--- --- - .... ., ,,,___ __„--- _:, ,._,' .... , „,.. 1 .3._.:,.., 1,,,, ___ _,, .,:,,., ii.z1\ • ,* ___ \ ..,>„,..„ • . ii L.11...0-A ,:-..- ______- - litt,- s• : ..„:.\ \_ -7- ---- - • • -11‘/ —_-_ ----A_-- "-— --' et* 79)'- --\-:___ ------ reify • • -111 11:\ ...:::71 \f--/ i \L_--\0,- so _ •:..,i,,s.*** • 0---t, ,.. 1 - ___ --- _____--_, - Isis I -to • • - -- ___ i -)c...__ _ 11' ,A° 01100 r \ '41-it?'J.: .4_ 110 - 7.7..A.&./..11-1\_:_— .7 - *--' -\._ 200----\--- ' ,.. // , -----"- - -W'V --- - _......--- ./.--rifIrl-T1-6(1f19.1-\ r•-• ..1r-3-- jlek,,_, , , ,:, .., LLII q - '.'- - :_AjliOigil-i-I-1 ..-1 T - --N S 91-1 pr________ City of Southlake, Texas Surrounding Property Owners ZA00-030 11111111iii III 1rI . AIM l' r= i ■■Urt el 1 PII 111111 AI l 8� 4 I „B1„I l Ia PROSPE %TA HMI 4 ivic � Atil WI 1 � znal till Q -I\ \ 1-- II I 1 Property Owner Zoning Land Use Designation Acreage 1. J. Cole 1. "0-1" 1. Office Commercial 1. 2.83 acres 2. The Fechtel Group 2. "NR-PUD" 2. Mixed Use 2. 30.79 acres 3. The Fechtel Group 3. "NR-PUD" 3. Mixed Use 3. 2.96 acres 4. Southlake Central Venture 4. "NR-PUD" 4. Mixed Use 4. 5.60 acres 5. Mendez Ltd. 5. "AG" 5. Medium Density Residential 5. 3.00 acres 6. B.Paulsen 6. "SF-20A" 6. Medium Density Residential 6. 0.60 acres 7. Southview Phase 11 JV 7. "SF-20A" 7. Medium Density Residential 7. 0.49 acres 8. R.Reece 8. "SF-20A" 8. Medium Density Residential 8. 0.46 acres N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\NOTICE\2000 Exhibits\0003ORSP.doc 'll-3 • ... . . . . ' . • • lgil -'• •. .. . •-•:F7-* IL. ::.. ii..... :::,........... :.... : : .,...J.1 .,. !. I ! il •! F..7•72:-..7" ',..7.r.'2: f.*•.:•...:: RIF::::TI :17-_-.L. ,?. ...:. ...... iir.:,.4:.1.7-:,:: :,.,,Pflii.i...if 1---tr"' -7 • f.÷- - - ' '3i..".. --..-.. . : : I. i I ,..t,- el. -' .... ... Z..=.:Z ' . •-• . d '4 i I I..----. i =.:...-: --...-... I --• ----. i,i-F-'-'0E1"-- -p.i.-.. ••7-1 .-_-_-_--:-- 2..... ._ .- 7==---- ..'3-.:3.;...........t.L.i ,,* . :.‘ •••' .•\ Nkil • s...\\ \ .......„„,.._, P; :.. L- . a.. L .. II ,-, •2_;,..• •••• • • • i_;._,.... 1 I _-,...._. - .------ . .-i-..!_- . is • .r. litiallb. s - ' um • 1, t ii 41. ; ......, 1 : ..... -r.,•_. • "' R:--.--IF7'" ...... Z -.1) • 4.---t • - :[_-__. -, . . ---7_- ---------- 111;111' ,, p, . ,.;.:••••.... ... _ 7.-_••=__ - i 1 i 1.1 51,..1.IA..,/ ..-.-....-.--.-........ 44;• '.2..."*.rje.:2.. . C...::_:112.1 7- .• / ;,; ' *J tr -J 1..- • . ,, . .. /'' /• .%.,..._-•_--:•••2.-..-_-_,--.-_-• E-.7'.r.-F..r.-_-7.----,,.:7- -.--_ -.-.-....:•::::-.-- •x•:,.1 0; . / 7 . .-,-.- 77 -•• --- - 1 ''''' riE'r ..---.. ,/,'. /' i f.-- .7.--FE.--;'=--- --f---...::.4'.;•:=2;-:1-7:77- -7:::::z-7:41--- - --.-.1 .. .- 1.1 11 . •rot . - .. ....•- " i.".-,-:;.:-:.....7::.1"------- ....7...i'iti.7.7....""" 7.. '''.' ' .7..-1.:' .-:!I...7-'.7.....-Z-....-.. . . •'''"""::I r'11--. ...1 I i toi ''.• ' - 11311:1 ; ..!....,..' : :.;= = ---- ....--- -.tx,,,. ....., _ . ....-.7.z.-_....____ 1.-7-•F.F.---.1:31.-:!:- • -.-- il I I' gig -1 •V.: i • EIL.J11:•::::::: •:-.- _:--•-=-- . ••••• •••••• ,.--- --., ,....____ . ._ ._ ._ . .-_-.-. ....:. 1"1.0N1 . 11 Li_--, :r.r. . i .:::...??.t..:-:...r.::-.::2 -7 . ."''' ''..:.,. v ,1 I L_____ .._ ...._.. 0 v L,hair' _ . = ; ti. ,!..".•''''''-:' • -* (7.= • Jaria,:.. I 11121L11 ....... ....... ---:•:.......=2. v".t.;1 ‘•11ti . me ILIIIILL GA014. - Z.:••&4 il 1 pos r . i st :LOCK 10-.--. ..-•••••;....- ? ii, , c,,.[woes•.....1.• Lt. ....1.31 1151.111./..“40411.wont.14.1 . ............ " ....• - 54.1.1...a.11.1.6 Z.......=.... - : .. ••• ILOT 21 -.4ilLilld4 .2 - \I ... A.m., ....••.... -....... • ::: mi IA. OM 0.-.... --D ----„ir _...... = , ,, . _ „E. .1 I // ‘1-- 01P`tErf LANE at - .t.: •••3_•L.:.-ii.,s li .,._r_rt... .,....7. -•••• -I•1 L4.-14"• r-ra . 1...21LGI'll • - • cuoriu• alLUI.11•1 LP .1fM%. ...C.- • .• -••••••••• ...... .Arprx•mrAn / 11.1 1,11 • .111114 15.4 .. 5, :.L a ji I .----1-- •r MEN • I ..,....-.1 .,;.: - .- - ". 1 i. • • WA 11%....444•41 /1"...L 14.....a* 44.11 5- "...- • ..-4... •,1 1 U;:f.:.!. V. t It 1 INE . ha 1'14, ,,,....=. CI-.tr.(.15 /MIL LICLI*V471,01.1.1.4:14 •........ , Sx-i,z..?„..1.."1•3!! .11 EMMX Wm.. 711.7. .1.1 1 ..411:::11,441,1 •ALICN t• YuNINE AND ....SUP ....,....:....1..!...7.....;7:......c........:..z.......i.........: i: : 0 . -1,....:,.. 1 ..,.... ..4...„....,..,....„.... , ...... • 1,, .1. :4 ...-. .::_L,;....:_.... • .5 4:, r-Itet-2-=" 1•-i'.• I -.12 I i 'Isl I .,...•.• f......./ ___. • ''- . 1 ....,,,r....:, r- r -.•t • ! I 1 1:--I._ :T.:: ;.. 1 . ..i ihli -,.. ,- I I u.u.ba - . I! ! -;-, •,. 'win ,,,,Al _.,:m...A.,..."'" -__._116.- 4,14632, , ..7.7,77-srx ...sub 4......4. -- ....."1.4 1....5 _...-._ ----- - .d 4.A *mum • ...:\-\-\-\-\-‘: ••••* N. 2 4: A 1,•:,,:'•1 I 1.1.--A--. -=-1..,------ .__-01412-ssrze--c . WE •‘. ----- •••........" ' : H 1.110.1 ...... •• ,I,,,,,r•-:H...:•434..544„. 112.1111..41MIN Milt E,.I 41h It A I. • : • • •'\\\\\\ _Y...i& tr.\ ‘_ . Y\•.•11; ..._ ::) All I I\\ Ill \ ‘‘ ............, . Mill•Maa le ..;"5•":'1 .I. _ --:- • nifIlIVIIA ILLY :! r.!I . -a----s' 1 il .10.::: 1. II - -----1.- I .i I .1 i.•,•.;•.•rill i'r.tr''I •I'I f" 1:` \. ...-1\. ' 71`...': • .- .--.---.- - . ; !4„o .i•I•i•C‘LIi 1"I'l'lit :\ 11'. ...-*; •. •____• •_____.. i, • i . I 1_ I ',PI PII,1 I ;i 41..1111 li! : : !.. • 1 .!L . !.. ...--‘'. M111611011r111%111M11 Stilt Kw. - t• ' !" • ;• • •!;:."•15111,111.111).1'1. .. ..e ••-- IA SPJ Ulf .....A.m. mommi Il r: ! •!-;1)11;11-7•7!•rj 711 If) j I •'••V A liTil---nplairrilTihr.tigriri i . .• i • • : ! I • • .1 H..;.•!•.•;, ..,.„....\ .i..! . .4., ..„........ ,,, . ... ......4`....A ‘;. •••%la Ica-Tray or......o...lilt tauftni -.1 .....1 .•• I i • ; .• . ; 111C11•110 CIJAS 1....11 ABU IQ .41 .. I , SLOCI II__ . i'cai tf..riR 3 a igt! ',.1:"..11,-14.1. • • ......___ . . . . . ••.PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN . . . - . • °''-e•_auos• --- I I WEST - 2.DMUdONSSHOWN FM P1HIDWG NBGHT 6Sf MHER HR00R ELEVATION FAX i ,/i i ���/ / ' // STRUMS I: SIG ./. % i�/.i i/-/ /, �. ASSOCIATES.INC. nG �nEGA �, 6t PHONE:RI113161199 PHONE:RIEI62l- I °• ...YYY FAC R141 346 6053 FAX 12141624.2586 CMLB4GOIEBT: CML ENGINEER: A CHARMS GOJER6 WALTBR P.M00REfi ®vs MI ASSOCIATES.INC. ASSOCIATES al PHWE:12141340.1193 PHONE:1713i 6367300 T4 $ Ys30[AsTl m[ m PMrr[r$ To .rM,w[r$ co v6wMET$ to v.00m ,a ru,vcTA FAX R1(316�3 FA:R131630.7394 Y Y rj :; \ TO epo($ I ,M-°• I ,m•_r „d_°• LT-.• Alf-r 1 `.�. ua-o o.v.w6vcr lu-r -. 1 I lA BIWHffi4C. ILE s.n w.rml. ausio nu S 1 ,w-1 vm ,,.. �.^4r .-. - . : FAS(72(24.31550fi 1 - FAX 197212/9J655 s_ I� I � . M�In�p11F161I _ MIFRETEN-0_waaY ::i :i 6ASHARKHAH EN6IMERING. 616PB63PEBLS.FVC. /� j WC. PHONE:R14112L5559 J///%�///i/i r /7 / / / / -/ ,/////://?7, •,/'/ / %� ' ///// MONE 12141 692.5165 FAX R111 62 4-5 84 8 �// i/ / ' / / / ' F 23169 ,i�Z /'/�/ /j0/.//,‹ //// /.%/. 4%��%�/�%/j/ �j',-/j'//4% AX RIq sr-r .1, ]✓-r j, n'-o•Y .1, ]6'-e• 1 ,r-s• j, n'-s }y GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Te' NM COMPACTORS PHONE:pm 965-1226 1120r 02I BUILDING 100-ELEVATIONS 1/20' FAX 12111 96 513 63 NO. DATE SUBMISSION II1,001A.TT SIM MY= °�A1f f0s 0101.99 S-P-1 SL9YTTAL m s,o as MEM6Ta 1001 03.29.99 AENSIONS ChM 4•11T �1� use OAT LC Y•"•'_i" G.S �_ F-' \TO ICONir-y� "T. C , � \T41]O•N.�F ` �. BO.;N10PY } e ryry __ z: I I f I111U1 ` I®I:' M.-a - i1 11 ilk.-._ I. 1 16O + n maw r-t NORTH ~ 6ti -6 .d$ °- �6K EAST IIIII Ut I•-r j/,j'%;.i'/;/;',4%%;/,% % /%///' ' '%%�,-/'' i'' ,•-0• 1.-0. • '/';, /' : '' / 4. PHASE 2-BLOCK 10 ,�,12077 TIT TO[MGMSOUi14Al0y TEXAS Ilemejt4T fo(1114 an I AYO[yllp eft W en ECM M f®MU I611 WWI PHU Wet WI MC T.O®NO$ -r BLOCK 0�]. T.O.COMM AlM 7. 11 a�• ' � - TO_=O,r-r$ � _> , _6$ BUILDING ELEVATIONS TIONS. L- l ' ` 1 I . 1 -I I ' p0n� n 171 a- ] CASE NO.2A99-025 10d-0•_6 s0'Y �--—I,-n - _- -_'—. I_--- ".6 1 0V-70 WEST SOUTH --\ r-O'N00001.- ..-°- .'-:';';:'..-.';',:li -7•::•":-</...;:;:-:-- .-- ,/y '-°' f-e ;//.;,„- 6M.WY /j /,'i .A, y - 142 y VC-r BLOCK 10 _ BLOCK 01 l BUILDING IOC-ELEVATIONS- 1120r 97074.08 4 OF 6 — 1 JOB NO. SHEET • I ;.r.: OP; �[.11 -::-,1 ; 't 0 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ELEVATIONS '"` ` :6.. ,v `. 0I{r, ° � ' FOR BUILDING 10C COOPER & STEBBINS Cooper&Stebbins,LP..,1256 Main Street,Suite 240 Southlake,Texas 76092 Telephone(817)329-8400 Facsimile (817)251-8717 March 23, 2000 Mr. Dennis Killough Senior Planner City of Southlake 1721 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, TX 76092 Re: ZA-00-030 Revised Site Plan Lot 1, Block 10, Southlake Town Square Dear Dennis: Pursuant to your Site Plan Review Summary Number One (1) dated March 17, 2000 item number one, we do not propose to use the added loading area for tractor/semi-trailer delivery. The space is intended and designed for customer pick up at the store and as such a tractor/semi-trailer will not physically fit within the space provided in terms of length or height. A separate tractor/semi-trailer lay by has been provided behind Building 10B. Sincerely, . • t4J1-10 Vice Pre - t-Development cc: File City of Southlake, Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 00-030 Review No: One Date of Review: 3/17/00 Project Name: Revised Site Plan—Lot 1, Block 10, Southlake Town Square APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Cooper& Stebbins, L.P. Beck Architechture 1256 Main Street, Suite 240 Southlake, TX. 76092 Phone: (817) 329-8400 Phone: (214) 522-8494 Fax: (817) 251-8717 Attn: Jeff Jones Fax: (214) 522-8537 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 03/01/00 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y See Comments No. 1 Residential Adjacency Y See Comments No. 1 Building Articulation Y Substantially complies with previously approved plan Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage N Not applicable Bufferyards Y Complies with previously approved plan Interior Landscape Y Complies with previously approved plan Driveways Y Complies with previously approved plan * The purpose of this revision is to add a loading area in the northeast corner of Building 10C and revise the footprint/floor area and north elevation of the building. This site is subject to all conditions of the previously approved zoning and site plan unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 1. If proposed loading space is intended for tractor/semi-trailer delivery, it must be fully screened of view from residential properties and adjacent rights-of-way by a minimum 10' masonry wall. * Denotes Informational Comment cc Jeff Jones—Cooper& Stebbins, VIA FAX L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\REV\#SPLAN-1.WPD 1 - I_ _ — I I I _11 •`. _,_...x,, _ _EIPEPAL WM --,.-,;--.... , .:,,,:•-,-P':.-,.. /. ::.....1.:.•:-.- ..,•;.',1'.'',:if.11,..=•3,,„\-\\.:k\- :\\,\P7::: it r'.,.' \ \ • :.---... '' •1' ' r"i (,:..) ,::i -.i v i 1 -,,,.,:.....,,, ---mange--'''11/. --'...: -. ''':', --. ' - -"-- rf. ,-,:;, .. ,'-•:--, --2:T:; ,.-.,.,. ,,,,,,,,,,. ..f ::•;-;:`._:.,s.':• •!:r;'.-.;'''''-''''''ir.4',.' 71,,:„:-1---: ' .j. -'iJ•it;,0-A00;4111-.Z0,6T 7, . 1 /.2•;,,.;* - -; 7••_t.,..?'' y,4; , ,12.'.•;•:-,Z/,`•:%:', ,,)••i :-.;•:/,,,/;,%.•;;,•/,,''..•• evil,•'.' BUILDING 1OA `Lr:f 1 -—,.., ,-,,..- ..,„-,-,-7,55-/z/..,, : „;;;;.::,,..,,..,-.•,,-li.c.: _,s‘,..,--;-."-;/-. ;,.-.;,:evt,. ,..i, .. -.:?.....- sure.SF.7.114 SF .7:.:-.' • :::-.22.-;<.,;(i!.-5 "1,-;74...'<-:';'.....': '2,,' .,. „.'/;:?,!-,:,. INITS '.Cr)•:: :P ) _-__'','Alic.,.:',;7,,,,c;;,;(,:ges'>':•.%4Z;/;W;'4/ :err ' ,..?'W,72,./''.1 '-r:;;// /''''tre,'..iV^Y.':;::',7';'%..":7%//%//4.71/..<;',..,//,':'.g '.‘4,./.,::///?..1 :I.I .:!,,, BECK -Y'..':-,,,,,,,; r1,47tit4if-74i•rf- t4 7-, ..!, — ---- ..--:..,„,,-./.;,-,...%:53:2.-,..,;.•:,. .-.,:%x,/, ,-.- -72,- ,%-•- ,, •,-•• ,•-•.,. --- ---,-,.-0;,,,p ,-;,,%•.-2.->..-;:%%,.. .,:,--.•/.;,%:.. 1-.../•,0,,*,..0,,, _,,„- ARCHITECTURE MI 110114,1113.0 "121113 — ",-,--.d,Z,,,-4.-.,-,-e„-7,-4'..,•,/,;,,,,,:-.-,-,1:%-/'-/ ,,,,. •:7 7,;,, vr, , ..,2 ,, 13011.1... 2 ..4-%..., . '.,' ' '>., s Z. /, IIIMELLYM 60 MOM. r - ___ , ,' ' - ,',,,,/,'/..,_../,',.' •`,!,,,z/;;;!:;:c - " /,;' 'i' ' WWW.IECIIANCNITECTURE.COU L, —_ ,..';'7., ,/7., ;7';'''' Z''''..;,/;;.<:9.; :;.7. ',/' //, '' ',7' \ ..--''' -' '.... ' di =,, 1 ,', ii. __ -4,*:,,,:;;,/,,--. ,:i , ,, , .,:,,:, „:. ,..____,...., ,,---,, STRUCTURAL IMMO: DIVEIOPEI (Man OM DRAMIC LOOM*SIMMS 1-- is1101WiNIBWNA_ 7 --- • ;';•:. ?'•-'!// /' -'' ,.,,,, ,,z, ,..,,:.,.. .7,..4 ,,,,, ,z,,,/, //.C".,,?•4//'CI /2,./.,/,/,". '2.,.'',.,-.;--,.',/ ....- hil 2111241611 1721 Esa Southlala ad 51014.12MS Sim 100 '. , . —->•.,-,.i.,-•:.;•.:',4,1',.,.':-4,•::;;•:/7' /,',•••:,••'••:;:":•%/7;:''',"' •;,•>/-",'•';/;'A,..:• •-•" -— .,e :%?.:4 <'.•/ ,>'•:72c•-7' :-- .'•;;?".% ",t' ',..,' ,'',OM ,---------' Swift.TX 1V732 MAR ENGINII Tal 1117-179 NW 1161.ENGINDRS.PC F.6117511711 1 g • .„A 4 IT-•)/(4..,.1-.„.,,%•;:...,....,...,,-:,y,,,,..-.,,,,4•; .„.„,•. /- -....: ,.....,„ ---r-- — 1 g n...-:-...r..-- --.i..9t,i..y ,, N,..,: • •-:.'''. ,:,..1.-,...",:7-77,::%/7;/,,,',/,,,. /2/..:,,,2,,, /P1% ; ..Z.i.,‘,/.•3.:.1%.,>;',4•'i s„%,.., GuzTd....11.412.455511 ..Awc.....1....... i 1"1_:-- 7-7-01 • ' --.A ,,-.71.-:•-•-•,.:,:,,,1,--..-1.;:.,...,,,,3,,,,,,,,,,,,,K,./"),,,./.;',://•• ',,,:•:,•,•:;;;•.1 •;,-,.,e3v. :7,174.1.1:,.....-. ", k. ..„,c, „•.; ,.,.,i-.••;,,,,-, / , ...., _ •,- :!:"..r. ',,:4-!..?:';;;tif•:;-, •;:"./L, /,//' ',/,,,,,,,,,,,,,; ,/.pi„..',., ,-.-i,,,7: . 4 :* 1 lia caNTRACI= lil 713 LIMO TOIA 955-1270 FA.?,3€00 in4 't, I 4,';'.7,g.2.41-:,,,"';0,50.,,",4;:f.:.',774.%/;','27/':/,'-1,;.Ze/',';''''',!Plain 'ir•'' ; ' i ''.''` Fat 214 951353 ii,,,,,,,,.., i BLDG1013 ? — ,-- -;....,. ?,--.,c4-!:-.„...,,,,..,:;.;.:,/,.. - , ,/' 0,;-•.• ,'.//.-, I I-,> 1 '"'" LEE CNONEEPRIGAC. hi 172 ill 3:05 Fa 911211365 EMI.IF:11 SU -.!'/'./':-i;'.;',;2'-/--',2!'.:!,),..2/22,.2imn upwr2',-'..,. :/- ;7;,2':1;-;;;;;'' :- . a` g _3 1 tE911 f . - -f•-•'•/,,/-4,/,:.'i,--..7 ,./. .:, trjr.jVy:.- ,,;:''.', %.' ';',i/0A,,-;'f'',,''i i ig /' g ; ,L .., ;.0-;;;,,;.,'.;,:,,,':;.,/,<'/',%`-;;-',</..";',./,';',.%",/,/%'///1-'-.:,;/.''''- .''''./,..7/-/,'-'-:/',.''--.4.4-- ''%/ ___ —i--'1 I . !; '1-'4'';'.<;.:.'%;"•,•* 7,..4 ':<ii.i6,'„, 22z, "-.'"2:7,:,';. /' ' If ,/,,y/;:„/,/ _ac) , -y• •-,--' ,/2',',„/"//... -• <•• •/,/,•,•zx•,,,-/•,,„/•,,,-,•, ,,,,,,„,,f,- ..:..A...:,,...... .:.„.."..-,..,..„:-/j.,,/,:i1;,•,./•::;.:7-,",:,,,,,,/".4...,,,,:/•;,;,/,:,;,:,/-iri:,,•/::/,.:;;z7,,/,,,,/,,;,,0%.--„2/,./.:...,<,,f,,,,:',„...:,,,:',..,_„.,v.,,,,,-.%/2,,;,././, ./::,/?Z,;.,.57-,',! --.•v ,...' .',/,,--; ,------•,- ,y-------;,?,—,.///•', f, •-,-,„ i...._ //z•••//,..•,/,-:32.:,:,,, ,,'• -;. .:7,;;;;•';;;;;•;,' Z',/%%'?'; ';',..;',/' I H . •:.,..,- ,..,„.i ,i-:-: —g 1 - • ...‘..4.: -,,-;- : %%;.-,,-, % -. .„-.,.,.,:•, ,-•..,.. -%,%:.r%: -%-;..,..,';:-•1111 u -, •,.....c.:.2s, -4- 1E3 li —II; r's:....1un,,,a1---... — _ _ It , 7; .;i:::. 4HXt .'':.;,.'(.;?/;,',/,, :; '/:.%/..27/4;,",. '4 LI iNall'il1:,; ..::•;-';',;Z :'./-,//, ''.•• • * , -;-..;-:',/'/-..7;';'%-."-/-1/4.'""''W/4",#/'1177' KEY PLAN:-._.„:-',•:.-.4, -i--__ IN '' ' %.,:•ft .:.-' ,'.•.?'.? -'-;•.? %.'/';/0 •.,'z0•,- (-#5'>.;;;X/)./p;0,-/*.;,/ ra s::‘,1 1 , ..:,: ,:, ,,....-.•:2••., -,/,•.•</•;;;;,-;';;/-,2,y4,,,,,5.4::'.,••"-;;;:::///%1!,-,/;-. / rif ‘..: '.:',5t• ,•_,:',4--?-:).,; ;";., %;;;;:: : „,!‘• :;.•- ,•"-;-:. ;,,-,,-_-.•,.,,"'-%;;;%,• •/:<",2:;::::W7. 4 ri;.,,,,,, Na DAIE SUBMS904 ,.. m a. y &,•:,,2,Z,%;..-;';-:>%i;:/, 2•/,'. ';-'?,'2i%'-.%', '"'!/;/ '/-.0. '."% 2-';i%'-jj/,:; • -,,,,. .__, :i-;%• '- •.-;:;2;%/.•:"..;' •,.-. t.t i;r ,.'''':i-?;/;;:',";:-4•'% ":%;;./%2/,/,04'0'//,-;"•(/ MI- '-•'-•rs", 11-7:11:4-=.1 NI.3,T rc'II .,:, '-,''''..:,i;:,..,./.;,,7„ !,•ri'..-f:044446/, ..A. ,'/;,,' ,%. //'/:;;';-.,---.47';-0,-,-./; ml' /,--,.L_— ,—. ,..:,.. ."...,' •J L__R..,s.7. (,J:-'2,,,,,--(), ;',,T,Y-''';',/:,..''tP9':-2'"/;;'.1.:::f;<.-,!;,<<"2/./z,„.2:7.--2;(22'22:-.27,,/47,.2/2'22/2 DK — ____ -- •'s-- ' k- '''' t .1*.::Is.. Iiii*;:;;&--);`,-;( ;-Y6'':f.f--1A/0 . ;"0.0% 7/') .%,.V/"%,..;;'-,,?/;:a A '- - I'qC:31- ,;),.. , ... , ,, ...;, ,, ..., ,il.. ,,•./,' ,•".'...;.. _'"...-,,./.7.2);:/// ./;22,...///:-,?,":-/,,/-'2;1'.? 11 • ,. BUILDING 10C ,—'..:"- (-, . ' -BUI 6ING 10D — ' <>2'/","`'),---/./"; ';'/% X•••• -;;;;;..:-/;?;-_, /" ../7, , - ONE STORY . -; ,: ::"..,.'4..'V4-%,7/2ii%/ ;!, I SLIM SF.1.441SF . ? 1• . 'ONE' ORY ' •-•' ••. SUM. 10,201 IF 2>;22/.:- ;:.-:':' ,,,/,'''W. li- SOUTILAKE TOWN SQUARE •;;;;7/.p..% ( '-'';; BLOCK 10 ':.':IZajf- ,"/,,4?•,....:, :•••.-,/.%'.4.-.4%./,',:mi::';''',.:4,1_ SINITHLAKE,lEKAS ..., :',..1-1,EDIVEIMENPABBEENS-'.;, i!'i;arli),ENESIIMEMff..MINREINERIEMMIFISME.61-1--r'4,—, C.. '', '---' Filf .:.,::•....-„',,• --\\‘ ..e\'--<'\ \,\'„1-, -. -• "Rt -< :. '-g-- '',/• ..)).\..-„\ ,\ :„ ..•-.. . ,. \ \\ . \ , s-, ..,Q.,:i.? SITEPLAN — 1111:PECT MEET , -,,,,.:,,,-.. -:6' \`"V' \ __ \\„\\ ,‘ \ ,:.-:),- . \ \ \ 7---7),.. • •,:::•-....,,,,,, •\,.-,4, znco 030 ,Li' 7.p ktt,i1 ) ) vf.) q3 ,ro RECD MAR 0 1 2000 BLOCK 10 CI __ ''S.' L ---- -- 1 (11-0'I _ __ rthl-SiTEPLAN 97074.08 1 OF 3 JON Pe I I 1 I I I I I -I- I I I I I I I I I 11 -- ki)--0Elf 5 Mali r9 (v 1 r---L`Lz't1124- di (1) (!) (2 0,1 r 11,4“..ENT . , ---,.....z.:-,--= g-- ,..-----"111 .,i' --5., I) 0 .. )) BECK , ,.,,,,o,n4,.. .. 1 j,4,_,,,,,,. .MO..61,-lai ''',,..,..'170fi'iMir,r4''.1...,-i0: 9E"'''''... 1 VA..,I. 2 .,!Aii:014,,,.:.;4,n,4,7.71 41.757'''.q.' ''. 'i...!:.1.1,410itNi''''.11,- '.' . . -4,44itkir: 741S4 ARCHITECTURE - .;IIIIIRR.iinpr-Ar-'21•- •$Zi-,---- -"', .....,:m447,:4,.,444?„•,,...,,.-.z__-___../ 1±.......,,W-0, mammrsonesimizawg 7-rEqz...,:, /"-- ' .,,„. .. -,..--I,...*.v: . 4,,,, ,,4.,,'4,.A'Aflit,I An Mama orTnaz ;t• ..... .mi...........1, ... 1.11= q TO 7.4.. MARIN 14.1.66111. fIS11.1116/ WWW.IPECIIAACNITECTIIOEC011 -77718-.717`.: .•-:•-:'-' I IN SFRUCTURAL EWES!: DELTIOPER. !.sit.,,, ir , • ., 12 C.,- ----T=';•14 ±Ut.c..'", ., -••••_-. ',.•-.. 14 , '..--;'-' ---1.'" '•••-, 1 0 0 IIII, " ,.... .. - I : : 41: _ --s 7-_',. -' ' - MI M.f.4. '24:24,$ mu"ULV6‘1227:.824.1.361.C7 s71721Ewni:StattiLBSUIMSEAAL -..- --a T...7 51S-1-_,I,, i'Gt.g'2a. - a• 1-• • ••—....l4f.a -1---j - -mrig. Sauthka.M600 :4,,,i..W213::',.....V.0,t., WER.FliGtait TAIS17329 MOO 4,g-ig-/- - ——2=-,.—-,-,:;;-;;; -4) --,...;:ieTZ.:i: - -— ..-.,- v 5-6i \-.72g•tagf441- -4?f,';''. — • _0--E. -I I---\s- ,w=6-E-4.-r- "'"'NETRI'RC- Fax 81725111117 1.1214821 SSW CAAL ROMA: F""&rafi" WAL1IREMOOTE 6 GENERAL CONDUCTOR. ASEC.AITS in CONRIAZEIRS IS ill MOM Tel 214 MAIM FAA 7116307141 FA1214 9651353 LEUNIANTIANG.INC _ - r__ 1 04[WEST ELEVATION 1/8°=1-0° [03[EAST ELEVATION 1/8'.1'-0' TA,B77743105 F.19722483855 (111 ili (i) ' 0.. .-...1 I I //---16. u::rrIr A .e. lc et5AlcA _ . I _C) Wigiti:Wrigiter i ° 'TMARSItigt--'0 EMI . a ,im.i,='-•, -• ,,4,4],;„„Ipotinglig!V— --=== ' •44f:t5.`"'-" ---' '-----=-- = '.'. . . ,q,,.. :•;::, \ Ttg 170 : r.er MILK - lMatkitaii*O. lai,4#TI4Ity'lI ....._.. ._....,...../ '_„,..2'..... .., ' I-......... ..........-...,..........._TY, 4,Pi \ / _ ___{,.,..,.. 711: ";44,- -/' ...r.:7,ii,"11-- "'71'.g-'777.4, - r_sna i•fE,.•,,----6-- _r14_ 777". , ,. =f.-'i .: •'... lel '1 C} '"T.1'''' % 0-4 -13....1%%7014.71,07:571., ru c KEY PLAN .------ ., 1 I s.... ,..:,.Z. ' ri. \l''.!!!?4,if ,,,___kg,..4•1_,;,,,o_ _ ______ , • - I- 1 .77-\''''----'•rat-.1.0-'7--':.4 NO CATE SUMMON& G 0 03010.1 ... _ ....._ _ . 02 I NORTH ELEVATION 1/8.1.-0 _ - (I) till a) ® 0 (5 —) 4DiseA T /; eclacK WZ._.Pm4.4i_-.pw4•0 ,4t1y,44s' •C-._a.z._....—, -eroi-1 t.,,,,,,-'---\''-...1H.:•1®-,L,____,...„-c,-m1..,.ti„• , ..'71111 Art FRJ. FL / / We 1,4 - ABNuEn TOW 1N0- ,„ Am _ MEE .Mill= 1.''FrnTgit0 I :104a4A0T4 q' ' ..., ,,, m 641111nolliN 11;1 it '0.-1 1 / 0 mortAAhrrAct!K. &N.51-4A1,120eiT CarCIIN T-TO,Ay FIN1911 FL.712,6_ 10..61.-2-.1,,F 20 Oa) . SOMME,MUIS EXTERIOR --- ELEVATIONS -,1,2-,=- 1 I ----m---7.4, . En MAR 0 1 2006- 100,-16 sd, E,/ 0 -,,,.s,...,,,.. ,‘,..,..., ' 41'4,4,57,27,,rom.'10,.. .... MICK 1-Z3N, BLOCK 10 PACYALE - F071.[SOUTH ELEVATION -,_ 1/8 1 ] 97074.08 3 OF 3 -Arai— -sifat I I 1 r I r I 1111 1 II II II II <i) 0.1 IJ r• @9 Cy) ral ARCHITECTURE Ianam W W W.JECEASCIIITECT9JE.C9Y staxnutumiamet MEW. rtMMT 1--JVJuu %- ^' 8WM'1Eh1E0AT61RACE CICIC E0491i MINS Ttl3141313817 1711[e45aNi4Od / Fa71Rtt35SIS S.I® WERESSKES T=ra . 16012 11.1281.100 % ' I -- -- 1 I� y 'OP i1C hail r]SI VII L ._- � -� 1 S.a} Er'E� ___ .„,,_.-- -...._----.:•.._._..." ,_� ...�_._- .' .-- - =S- ..` u---- '�J--—\y Fu11112455/7 W 1�I3WBEY r----1 - - ---. N - •S I i •I"'+ iS:\ /, '�F µ K aA IICBW 7iRALlu15 T 77I3/31 • - I mo` 7 i .114 ffi1357 -UFlCB♦fiPEEiMIG: q:e s •'' _ vv / N. _ fd1737E7Y>241 ZOO iVC. it _ _� T _ — — -r•r f ,r Q _ .._______Al I I I y L '- `- -- 7an Ia p N2r- 1 I .e n - _._._ `—1- �-------- -1 ----'� � ICG IOC N1L L 1., KEY PLAN 9 I 1 lux.m — , �k.v_____i._______ 1__—_. -- -_ -- p ___—,-0 H9 GATE sENISS I --- y a.7. I I I I pa a -11_ F ''s 9 I - - 1 I I l� ! �!_r P13�n I I aou,RAx BLOCK 10 SQUARE __-_ =..-tr-V-2 rovr 7-5v_.• r�',a, ._I'_@u—_ _•,1 1o• s+a _r-nll+_' `.-rain._.-.,':1-:-1.;_9.1__.. 11::.. ,. DIAE.MU ff FLOOR _— RECD i\AR� � PLAN — O 12U flake 10 �11FLOORPLAN — —. — — -- -- --- — — Ue'=1'-0' 97074.08 2 OF 3 :IOi lilt— 14E( 1 1 1 F I 1 I 11 I City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, ext. 814 Greg Last, Director of Economic Development, ext. 750 Subject: ' Ordinance No. 776 - Abandonment and Quitclaim of a portion of TW King Road ' Action Requested: Approval of Ordinance No. 776, which is for the abandonment and quitclaim of a portion of TW King Road right of way. Background Information: On May 4, 1999, the City Council approved Resolution No. 99-27 and associated 380 agreement, which in section 6a committed to the abandonment of TW King Road as follows: (a) Abandonment of T.W. King Road. The City shall cause to be abandoned that portion of T.W. King Road generally located adjacent to the eastern edge of Lot 1, Block B, MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1 and adjacent to the western edge of PUD-8 (MIXED USE) (Ord. 480-179). Such abandonment shall be to the adjacent landowners without cost or • expense to such landowners, and shall be subject to the rights, if any, of utilities located within such abandoned area. On July 20, 1999, 'the City Council approved the Planned Unit Development zoning for the Sabre Corporate Campus which included section 1-D as follows: "It is anticipated that a portion of the existing Kirkwood Boulevard (from SH 114 to the boundary lines of Property) and a portion of the existing TW King Road (that lies between the Property and Tract 2 of the MTP-IBM Addition No. 1) will.both be abandoned and closed for public use after the first of development is ready for occupancy. Notwithstanding 'the foregoing; 'however, continued access to such closed streets by Trophy Club's and the City's emergency fire and ambulance vehicles will be allowed unless and until the Texas Department of Transportation approves a two-way access road from Kirkwood Boulevard to "old" TW King Road. Such emergency access will be the same as required by the City's Fire Marshall. Public use of "old" TW King Road west of said Tract 2 will continue." 8A-1 Meetings have been ongoing between the City of Southlake, Town of Trophy Club and Sabre toward the development of a recommendation to TxDOT that will provide for adequate access to all interested parties. Continued progress is being made towards analysis of all options, preparation of an engineering report,and resolutions of support for cities involved. Sabre desires to proceed at this time with the completion of the necessary Council action to officially abandon these roadways, effective on December 1, 2001. They plan to abide by the agreement that requires the streets to remain open to public traffic until Phase I occupancy, which is anticipated in the latter half of 2001. Design and approval of the secure access points will be processed through P&Z and City Council prior to physical closure of the roadways. Financial Considerations: None. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: The City Attorney reviewed and approved this Ordinance. Alternatives: None. Supporting Documents: Ordinance Quitclaim Deed Exhibit Staff Recommendation: Please place on the City Council agenda for April 4, 2000 for City Council to consider and approve Ordinance No. 776, which is for the abandonment and quitclaim of a portion of the right of way of TW King Road. 4.4.4- 111 Charlie J. •omas Greg Last City Engineer Director of Economic Development • 8A-2 ORDINANCE NO. 776 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF T. W. KING ROAD IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORiZING THE MAYOR OF THE Cl e OF SOUTHLAKE TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED RELEAS/NG PUZLIC OWNERSHIP, INTEREST-AN) CONTROL OF THIS RIGHT-OF-. iAY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILIiY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant of Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local'Government Code; WHEREAS, the Texas Constitution recognizes that development and diversification of the economy of the state are public purposes and, in recognition of this constitutional amendment, the Texas Legislature adopted an enabling act allowing a city to establish and provide for the administration of a program to promote local economictdevelopment and to stimulate business and commercial activity in the municipality; WHEREAS, the beneficial economic impact, including construction, purchasing, employment and operating functions, of locating the SABRE campus within the City of Southlake is projected to be$14 billion by the end of 2009 to the City of Southlake and the surrounding area; WHEREAS, a fundamental criterion during SABRE's site evaluation and decision to locate its campus in the City of Southlake was the ability to create a closed, secure campus for the safety and protection of its-employees-and proprietary technology and information; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that the public welfare will be promoted by placing in private control a certain portion of T.W. King Road in the City of Southlake within the SABRE 8A-3 A(VACATE-2.WPD(03/10/00) Page 1 campus; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has determined that, if this portion of the road were not closed, the SABRE campus would be bisected by a public treat, :.:.-..:s. ng traffic conge3tirr. and safety hazards t7 life end property; anz: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has determined that closing this portion of the road does not materially and substantially impair access to any adjoining or nearby landowners' properties, because reasonable alternative routes of travel are available; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the portion of T.W. King Road to be abandoned should remain open to the public until a future date when the necessity for the closure of the road occurs; and WHEREAS, the franchised utility companies have expressed no objection to the abandonment of said right-of-way; and WHEREAS, in order to remove any question -as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said right-of-way, the City desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said right-of-way to the owners of the abutting property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 Effective Gs provided below, the following right-of-way in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas is vacated and abandoned as public property:.the portion of T.W. King Road, a dedicated public street, more specifically described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B (the "Property"). The vacation of this right-of-way shall be subject to an 8A-4 A:IVACATE-2.WPD(03/10/00) Page 2, Emergency Access Easement for the ingress, egress, access, and passage to and across he Property for emergency police, fire, ambulance, and other public safety vehicles and personnel, as further described in Exhibit C. Exhibits A, B and C are attached hereto and incoraorated herein for all purposes. The right-c;-way so: vacated and abandoned shall revert in fee simple to the owners of the abutting properties. SECTION 2 This right-of-way vacation shall be effective on December 1, 2001. SECTION 3 Upon the vacation becoming effective, as provided in Section 2,.the Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to execute a quitclaim deed; to the abutting property owners in the form shown in Exhibit D releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the right-of-way on the behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas, other than as excepted in the quitclaim deed. .A copy_of this quitclaim.deed shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, .Texas by the office of the City Secretary. • SECTION 4 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, • paragraphs and sections of This ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 8A-5 A:\VACATE-2.WPD(D3/10100) Page 3 SECTION 5 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED..ON SECOND.READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney 8A-6 A:\VACATE-2.WPD(03/10/00) Page 4 EXHIBIT A & C R.O.W. ABANDONMENT MTP-IBM ADDIT10N NO. 1 VOL. 388-211, PG. 66 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS BEING a 2.5382 care (114,921 sq. ft.) tract of land situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Aastrcc:t No. 1958, the U.?. Mortis Survey, Abstract No. 1015, Tarrant County, Texas, and the Medlin Su.vey .Aost'cct Na :588, Denton County, Txas, also being oart of that certain N.O.W. East T.W. King FcocJ' (voruhle wrath R.O.W.) by ro471-'-•1BM ADDITION NO. I, an addition to the City of Southlake according to the Final Pat there recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 2.6382 acre tract being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said MTP-18M ADDITION NO. 1, at the re-entrant corner in the west line of SABRE GROUP CAMPUS, LOTS 1-4. BLOCK 1, a proposed addition, to the City of Southlake; • THENCE N00'09'22"W along the west line of said SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition, common with the, east line of said MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1, a distance of 131.53 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right which has a central angle of 73'12'27", a radius of 10.00 feet, and a chord which bears N3901'39"W - 11.93 feet; THENCE departing the said common addition line and along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 12.78 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE N0225'20"W a distance of 35.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; THENCE S8734'40"W a distance of 90.98 feet to the southwesterly-line of the aforementioned East T.W. King Rood; THENCE along the southwesterly line of said East T.W. King Road the following: NO225'201W a distance of 152.15 feet to a curve to the left which has o central angle of 2659'29", a rodius of 290.00 feet, and a chord which bears N1358'45"W - 135.36 feet; Along said curve to the left, on arc distance of 136.62 feet to the end of said curve; N2938'04"W a distance of 1.84 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left which has o central angle of 42'59'03", a radius of 406.00 feet, and a chord which bears N51'07'37"W - 297.49 feet; Along said curve •to the left, on arc distance of 304.59 feet to the end of said curve; N7237'08"W a distance of 404.43 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which hos o central angle of 55'00.00", a radius of 474.00 feet, and a chord which bears N45 07'08"W - 437.74 feet; Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 455.01 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which has a central angle of 05'42'18", a radius of 1474.00 feet. and a chord which bears N14'45'59"W - 146.70 feet; Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 146.77 feet: THENCE N60'08'24"E a distance of 12.68 feet to the beginning of o curve to the left • which hos o central angle of 68'49'10". a radius of 84.28 feet, and a chord which bears N25'43'49"E - 95.25 feet; THENCE along said curve to the left, on arc distance of.101.23 feet to the end of said curve and the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left which hos o central angle of 08 56'22", a radius of 1406.00 feet, and a chord' which bears S13'08'57"E - 219.14 feet; Along said non-tangent curve to the left, on arc distance of 219.36 feet to the beginning of o curve to the left which has a central angle of 5500'00". o radius of 406.00 feet, and o chord which bears S45'07'08"E - 374.94 feet; Along said curve to the left, on arc 8A-7 ;89.73 feet to the end of said curve; S72 37'08"E a distance of 404.43 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which has a central angle of 5427'17", a radius of 474.00 feet, and a chord which bears S45'23'30"E — 433.73 feet; Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 450.50 feet to the end of said curve; S18'09'51"E a distance of 3.34 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which has 'a central angle of 15'44'29", a radius of 610.00 feet, and a chord which bears S1017'27"E — 167.06 feet: Along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 167.59 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE S0225.'20"E a distance of 60.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 114,921 square feet or 2.6382 acres.of land, more or less. oi, 2.1. ' -9.Fi '/. ..'Al; .i1,.1'.i "--'‘ ..1 i , /,; '• R.'' !BURN, JR. • (1:)q '3689 v.2' -' ess���T.n AiDI 8A-8 uaoru 9AAf1 . EXHIBIT B vim,aM aA,%D 04. 3g A40/nQ Nitie8.7 N,• �. i 0E�yTvN CI, OF _ G N I «.i 4 T gN4 E cC) 0, 1� R ck / nIIJ7s9B Q. •1/4^ ' Ise yII I "`x4S w •• C • �11 W.Mep��s:UR�� q Y :, See • 4/1• gs8�� O ; •1CII. ''tom TARRAN�C 1 .�► '-- MTp,IB 10 � Mfr. . / • •8 `� �ARnN S R�r. A'"r93 8 • A/r r 01s . zs 6�d,7 /'iC1 1.1- o V ://,. '.1 1-t4:#:,/, ., ••--rceig, , fr,,_ 0 f' 4 . ,. ,„, . •....... �" :. wro ut c1� . N for a Y J J 2/2 J O 1' r "'pa6 KIRK WO OD OULEVARn Ci tor< , vta� / SgS1,E. ' \\ �Or GROUP 8A-9 nor 1 (PROP• ock- S P. ,,4 R.O.W. ABANDONMENT MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1 VOL. 388-211, PG. 68 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC CH BRNG LC Cl 73'12'27" 10.00 12.78 N 39'01'39" W 11.93 C2 26'59'29" 290.00 136.62 N 13 58'45" W 135.36 C3 42'59103" 406.00 304.59 N 51'07'37" W 297.49 C4 55'00'00" 474.00 455.01 N 45'07'08" W 437.74 C5 05 42'18" 1474.00 146.77 N 14'45'59" W 146.70 C6 '0856122" 1406700 219.36 S 13'08'5 7", E 219.14 C7 55'00100" 406.00 389.73 S 45 07'08" E 374.94 C8 5427'17". 474.00 450.50 S 45 23'30" E 433.73 C9 1544'29" 610.00 167.59 S 1017'27" E 167.06 C10 68'49'10" 84.28 101.23 N 25'43149" E 95.25 • • LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 00'09'22" W 131.53' L2 N 02 25'20" W 35.00' L3 S 8734'40" W 90.98' L4 N 0225'20" W 152.15' L5 N 29'38'04" W 1.84' L6 N.:72 37.'08" W 404.43' L7 N 60'08'24" E 12.68' L8 S 72'37'08" E 404.43' L9 S 1809'51" E 3.34' L10 S 0225'20" E 60.63' 8A-10 MARCH 2000 QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § § NOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Southlake ("Grantor"), does hereby bargain, sell, release, vacate, abandon and forever quitclaim unto: First Security Bank, National Association, as Owner Trustee, ("Grantee") and any and all of its successors or assigns, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the property described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes (the "Property"). This conveyance is being made by Grantor and accepted by Grantee subject to all easements, restrictions, rights, encumbrances and other matters described in Exhibit"C" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes (collectively, the "Permitted Exceptions"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the Property unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, subject to the Permitted Exceptions, so that neither Grantor nor its legal representatives or assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the Property or appurtenances or any part thereof. EXECUTED this day of , 2001. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, GRANTOR By: MAYOR STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of 2001, by Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission Expires: TvnA or Print Notary's Name 8A-11 W:lSouthiakelDeeds\SABRE.Quitclaim.wpd Pace 1 Return to: City Secretary City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Grantee: The SABRE Group, Inc. 4255 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 Attention: General Counsel • • 8A-12 W:\Southlake\Deeds\SABRE.Quitclaim.wpd Page 2 EXHIBIT A R.O.W. ABANDONMENT MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1 VOL. 388-211, PG. 68 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS SE NGa 2.6382 acre (114,92; sq ft.) tract of land situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, Tarrant County, Texas, and the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1588, Denton County, Texas, also being part of that certain R.O.W. East T.W. King Road (variable width R.O.W.) by MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1, an addition to the City of Southloke according to the Final Plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 2.6382 acre tract being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1, at the re—entrant corner in the west line of SABRE GROUP CAMPUS, LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1, a proposed addition to the City of Southloke; THENCE N00'09'22"W along the west line of said SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition, common with the east line of said MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1, a distance of 131.53 feet to the beginning of a non—tangent curve to the right which has a central angle of 7312'27: a radius of 10.00 feet, and a chord which bears N39'01'39"W — 11,93 feet;' THENCE departing the said common addition line and along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 12.78 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE NO2'25'20"W a distance of 35.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described .,tract; THENCE 58734'40"W o distance of 90.98 feet to the southwesterly line of the aforementioned East T.W. King Rood; THENCE along the southwesterly line of said East T.W. King Road the following: N0225'20"W o distance of 152.15 feet to a curve to the left which hos o central angle of 26'59'29: a radius of 290.00 feet, and a chord which bears N13 58'45"W — 135.36 feet; Along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 136.62 feet to the end of said curve; N29 38'04-W a distance of 1.84 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left which has o central angle of 42'59'03", a radius of 406.00 feet, and a chord which bears N51'07'37"W — 297.49 feet; Along said curve to the left, on arc distance of 304.59 feet to the end of said curve; N72'37'08"W a distance of 404.43 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which has a central angle of 55'00'00", a radius of 474.00 feet, and a chord which bears N45'07'08"W — 437.74 feet; Along.said curve to the right, on arc distance of 455.01 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which has a central angle of 05'42'18", o radius of 1474.00 feet, and o chord which bears N14'45'59"W — 146.70 feet; Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 146.77 feet; • THENCE N60'08'24"E a distance of 12.68 feet to the beginning of o curve to the left .• which has a central angle of 68'49'10", o radius of 84.28 feet, and a chord which bears N25'43'49"E — 95.25 feet; THENCE along sold curve to the left, on arc distance of 101.23 feet to the end of said curve and the beginning of a non—tangent curve to the left which has o central angle of 08'56'22", a radius of 1406.00 feet, and a chord which bears St3'08'57"E — 219.14 feet; • Along said non—tangent curve to the left, on arc distance of 219.36 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left wh;'t, h.. ^ r^^tral angle of 55'00'00", a radius of 406.00 feet, and a chord which be = — 374.94 feet; 8A-13 Along said curve to the left, on or 389.73 feet to the end of said curve; • S72'37'08"E a distance of 404.43 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which has a central angle of 5477'17", a radius of 474.00 feet, and a chord which bears 545'23'30"E — 433.73 feet; Along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 450.50 feet to the end of said curve; 518'09'51"E a distance of 3.34 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which hos a central angle of 15'44'29", a radius of 610.00 feet, and a chord which bears S10'17'27"E — 167.06 feet; Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 167.59 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE 50225''20"E a distance of-60.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 114,921 square feet or 2.6382 acres of land, more or less. GMS,. • 1 p: ••,,, •••• !BURN, JR. • y:°q 3689 ' �S 5S1v-k _�• • • • 8A-14 II•Orli onnn • arr 8 9.44. 4" 4f7p Fr• 4.8,4 A, VOL.-183.41 ADD'vigetiVitfeiv / eR oiv r ••N` / ; ray A OF s , pc / ,c-- 4.... , ND , 00771, • 66 . R, ,°79%71- 1.-1Rli, LAA'r• . ,N..'c-- 1••No.175.,,..4. • : ....... j•- • I I • *----.... "...- . ...., •. 4.7 • • ......, pp. 44E.0 /I : . . 0 w. ,,,. . kilv st, • ••• '4,1•••-"•••••••., •. 13:100( ...JON A••. . . . . . - . i . cc:is"- )•-- „... • tnA ‘ -...... . . --.-,, ........ oA 0 •••.... . **•• '-1 C) .1.3% AlrAiaii: vol 3;8.271110 • • . i , ' 0. • I • .. •8 4,5) ^441?7,1%, 4•44?1,4.•,... . SWi'lez•y. •4./1 958 . . 4"70 is . Z6, (5).‘„) . ck>. ...,i -- - • , I I, (j B (4., : . . . . .„../,..s.0. i, I ;et 1 'I. ••• ... i '404 CI i ' . '` .. ' RN •• Cif D. • 0 6., - 4..,:/ l.71 .. . . . . .. . StiiNS- cV/$2 . • . \•. DP "Tp - r- t or tp . .,.., ,,.. . ..> r- • . 4 - . CS` 1 .. .......P.0.s I 1 KiRicyil 0 OD ES 0 L:L.E V A R D Cl . 1 . i;.'i.A 7 TEE'.:i A:,:i PA P.K::V C.:2•.'..i'; E.3 i'.F.I.i.E VA Fi'i'2I . i . : . • . . 4 0 7..; 7GRoup \ •.i. 8A-/5 4.or 1 Nop' el-oc us osE:0) A- i R.O.W. ABANDONMENT MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1 VOL. 388-211, PG. 68 CITY OF SOU THLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC CH BRNG LC Cl 73'12'27" 10.00 12.78 N 39'01'39" W 11.93 C2 26'59'29" 290.00 136.62 N 13 58'45" W 135.36 C3 42'59'03" 406.00 304.59 N 51'07'37" W 297.49 C4 55'00'00" 474.00 455.01 N 45'07'08" W 437.74 C5 05'42'18" 1474.00 146.77 N 14'45'59" W 146.70 C6 08 56'22" 1406;00 219.36 S 13'08'57" E 219.14 C7 55'00'00" 406.00 389.73 S 45 07'08" E 374.94 C8 5427'17" 474.00 450.50 S 45 23'30" E 433.73 C9 15'44'29" 610.00 167.59 S 10'17'27" E 167.06 C10 68'49'10" 84.28 1Q1.23 N 25'43'49" E 95.25 • LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L 1 N 00'09'22" W 131.53' L2 N 02'25'20" W 35.00' L3 S 87 34'40" W 90.98' L4 N 02'25'20" W 152.15' L5 N 29'38'04" W 1.84' L6 N 72'37'08" W 404.43' L 7 N 60 08'24" E 12.68' L8 S 72'37'08" E 404.43' L9 S 18'09'51" E 3.34' L 10 S 02'25'20" E 60.63' 8A-16 Exhibit C PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS 1. The rights of all existing utilities located in the Property. 2. Emergency Access Easement reserved by Grantor for the purpose of ingress, egress, access, and passage to and across the Property for emergency police,fire, ambulance and other public safety vehicles and personnel. This Emergency Access Easement is a private easement to be maintained by Grantee, its successors and assigns. This Emergency Access Easement is subject to Grantee's right to have access controls that are approved by the City of Southlake's Fire Marshal.. This Emergency Access Easement terminates upon approval and installation of a permanent two-way access road from Kirkwood Boulevard to "old" T.W. King Road by the Texas Department of Transportation. 3. Drainage and Utility Easement reserved by Grantor within the Property for the installation,-maintenance,and operation of water,sewer, electric,telephone,cable, gas, and other similar utilities and for the overland or underground transfer of storm water. The Property shall not have any permanent-structures, fences, or other obstacles hindering (1) the safe transfer of water through the easement or (2) the installation, maintenance, and operation of utilities; provided, however, Grantee shall have the right to install such permanent structures on the surface as are reasonably necessary to achieve the access control approved by the City of Southlake's, Fire Marshal, subject to the right of Grantor, its.officers, agents, servants and employees to install, operate, and maintain utilities. 8A-17 • W:1Southlake\Deeds\SABRE.Ouitclaim.wnd onna Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned,as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of T.W King Road as described on the attached exhibits. TXU El Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: --� Signed: Printed Name:' icy W SNt rrN Printed Name: Title: LtT«ay y pi=S(GNP2, Sr(. Title: Date: 3-8-as Date: GTE Central,Inc. Southwestern Bell Telephone Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Charter Communications Signed: Printed Name: Title: Date: 8A-18 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned,as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard as described on the attached exhibits. TXU Electric/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,IInnc. Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: ‹.it 1')• gokost RilCH Title: Title: fe/iA144A Jr- /t n/EMT!J«1lwe( Date: Date: ?— I ZOpa GTE Central,Inc. Southwestern Bell Telephone Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Charter Communications Signed: Printed Name: Title: Date: 8A-19 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard as described on the attached exhibits. TXU Electric/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: lw1 Signed: Prince ame: o k t"._\TS`lt7-e f Printed Name: Title: 0,5 e ,..rct.l,e.v a i S biie- Title: Date: 3--/ OCR Date: GTE Central,Inc. Southwestern Bell Telephone Signed?. i ti,�,..._-2_ Signed: Printe Name:�;1.-t j J itt.,,,•r'J Printed Name: Title: 4 SP f`eIVe1 v eft ov Title: Date: 3- -O 0 Date: Charter Communications Signed: Printed Name: Title: Date: 8A-20 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned,as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard as described on the attached exhibits. TXU Electric/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: GTE Central,Inc. Southwestern Bell Telephone Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Charter Communications� r Signed: b i'y G L, Printed Name: Wendy A c-tatt5 t.(,v1 Title: tbfiN y Date: - O7- aO • 8A-21 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of T.W King Road as described on the attached exhibits. TXU Electric/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: GTE Central,Inc. Southweste Bell Te hone Signed: Signed: s/e/W A Printed Name: Printed Name: �i-4 CA VA NL ss Title: Title: a/A-L< Date: Date: , '3/,t 7/ V Charter Communications Signed: Printed Name: Title: Date: 8A-22 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 To: Billy Campbell, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, City Engineer, ext. 814 Greg Last, Director of Economic Development, ext. 750 Subject: Ordinance No. 777 - Abandonment and Quitclaim of a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard Action Requested: Approval of Ordinance No. 777, which is for the abandonment and quitclaim of a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard right of way. Background Information: On May 4, 1999, the City Council approved Resolution No. 99-27 and associated 380 agreement, which in section 6b committed to the abandonment of Kirkwood Boulevard within the campus boundary as follows. (b) Abandonment of Kirkwood Boulevard. The City shall cause to be abandoned that portion of Kirkwood Boulevard north and east of SH 114. Such abandonment shall be to the adjacent landowners without cost or expense to such landowners, and shall be subject to the rights, if • any, of utilities located within such abandoned area. On July 20, 1999, the City Council approved the Planned Unit Development zoning for the Sabre Corporate Campus which included section 1-D as follows: "It is anticipated that a portion of the existing Kirkwood Boulevard (from SH 114 to the boundary lines of Property) and a portion of the existing TW King Road (that lies between the Property and Tract 2 of the MTP-IBM Addition No. 1) will both be abandoned and closed for public use after the first of development is ready for occupancy. Notwithstanding the foregoing; however, continued access to such closed streets by Trophy Club's and the City's emergency fire and ambulance vehicles will be allowed unless and until the Texas Department of Transportation approves a two-way access road from Kirkwood Boulevard to "old" TW King Road. Such emergency access will be the same as required by the City's Fire Marshall. Public use of "old" TW King Road west of said Tract 2 will continue." 8B-1 Meetings have been ongoing between the City of Southlake, Town of Trophy Club and Sabre toward the development of a recommendation to TxDOT that will provide for adequate access to all interested parties. Continued progress is being made towards analysis of all options, preparation of an engineering report and resolutions of support for cities involved. Sabre desires to proceed at this time with the completion of the necessary Council action to officially abandon these roadways, effective on December 1, 2001. They plan to abide by the agreement that requires the streets to remain open to public traffic until Phase I occupancy, which is anticipated in the latter half of 2001. Design and approval of the secure access points will be processed through P&Z and City Council prior to physical closure of the roadways. Financial Considerations: None. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: The City Attorney reviewed and approved this Ordinance. Alternatives: None. Supporting Documents: Ordinance Quitclaim Deed Exhibit Staff Recommendation: Please place on the City Council agenda for April 4, 2000 for City Council to consider and approve Ordinance No. 777, which is for the abandonment and quitclaim of a portion of the right of way of Kirkwood Boulevard. Charlie J. T mas Greg Last City Engineer Director of Economic Development 8B-2 ORDINANCE-NO. 777 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF KIRKWOOD BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, INTEREST AND.00NTROL OF THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; 'AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant of Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; WHEREAS, the Texas Constitution recognizes that.development and diversification _ of the economy of the state are public purposes and, in recognition of this constitutional amendment;the Texas Legislature adopted an enabling act-allowing a city to establish and provide for the administration of a program to promote local economic development and to stimulate business and commercial activity in the municipality; WHEREAS, the beneficial economic impact, including construction, purchasing, employment and operating functions, of locating the SABRE campus within the City of Southlake is projected to be $14 billion by the end of 2009 to the City of Southlake and the. surrounding area; WHEREAS, a fundamental criterion during.SABRE's site evaluation and decision to locate its campus in the.CityHof Southlake was.fhe-ability..to create a closed, secure campus for the safety and protection of its employees and.proprietary technology and information; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that the public welfare will be promoted by-placing in private control a certain portion of Kirkwood Boulevard in the City of Southlake within the SABRE 8B-3 A:\VACATE-1.WPD(03/10/00) Page 1 campus; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has determined that, if this portion of the road were not closed, the SABRE campus would be bisected by a public street, causing traffic congestion and safety hazards to life and property; and WHEREAS,-the City Council of the City of Southlake has determined that closing this portion of the road does not materially and substantially impair-acccso to any adjoining or nearby landowners' properties, because reasonable alternative -routes of travel are_ available; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the portion of Kirkwood Boulevard to be abandoned should remain open to the public until a future date when the necessity for the closure of the road occurs; and WHEREAS, the franchised utility companies have.expressesi no objection to the abandonment of said right-of-way; and WHEREAS, in order to remove any question as to the -continued interest or ownership of the public in said right-of-way, the City desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said right-of-way to the owners of the abutting property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:. SECTION 1 . Effective as provided below, the following right-of-way in the City of Southlake, - Tarrant County, Texas is vacated and abandoned as public property: the portion of Kirkwood Boulevard, a dedicated public street, more specifically described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B (the "Property"). The vacation of this right-of-way shall be subject to 8B-4 A:IVACATE-t.WPD(03/10/00) Page 2 an Emergency Access Easement for the ingress, egress, access, and passage to and across the Property for emergency police, fire, ambulance, and other public safety vehicles and personnel, as further described in Exhibit C. Exhibits A, B and C are attached hereto • and incorporated herein for all purposes. The right-of-way so vacated and abandoned shall revert in fee simple to the owners of the abutting properties. SECTION 2 This right-of-way vacation shall be effective on December 1, 2001. SECTION 3 Upon the vacation becoming effective, as provided in Section 2, the Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to execute a quitclaim deed to the abutting property owners in the form shown in Exhibit D releasing.all claims to title, .ownership, or.control of.the right-of-way.on the behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas, other than.as excepted in the.quitclaim steed. .A.copy.of.this_quitclaim deed shall be presented for filing with.the County Clerk.of Tarrant County,Texasby-the-office of the City . Secretary. SECTION 4 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance,.since the_same would hayE been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 8B-5 A:I VACATE-1.WPD(03/10/00) �'�� SECTION 5 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND.APPROVED.ON SECOND.READING.ON THIS DAY OF , 2000. • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND,LEGALITY: City Attorney • 8B-6 A:IVACATE-1.WPD(03/10/00) ' Paae 4 LAI-1IUII A R.O.W. ABANDONMENT MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1 VOL. 388-211, PG. 68 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS BEING a 2.5196 acre 009.754 sq. ft.) tract of land situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, Tarrant County, Texas, also being all of Kirkwood Boulevord (131' R.O.W.), dedicated as Parkway Boulevard by MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1, on addition to the City of Southlake according to the Final Plot thereof recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68, Plot Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 2.5196 acre tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1, at the re—entrant corner in the west line of SABRE GROUP CAMPUS, LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1, a proposed addition to the City of Southlake; THENCE along the west line of said SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition, common with the south line of the aforementioned Kirkwood Boulevard, the following: • 58734'40'W a distance of 137.894eet to the beginning of a curve to the left which has a central angle of 2419'16; a radius of 1419.50 feet. and a chord which bears S7525'02"W — 598.04 feet; Along said curve to the left, and arc distance of 602.55 feet to the end of said curve; • S63'15'25"W o distance of 32.25 feet to the southerly end of the westerly terminus line of sold Kirkwood Boulevard, in the easterly line of State Highway No. 114 (variable width R.O.W.); THENCE N26'44'35"W along the westerly terminus line of said Kirkwood Boulevard, with the easterly line of said State Highway No. 114. o distance of 131.00 feet to the northwesterly corner of said Kirkwood Boulevard; THENCE departing the easterly line of said Stote Highway No. 114 and along the northerly line of said Kirkwood Boulevard the following: N6315'25'E a distance of 32.25 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which has a central angle of 2419'16'. o radius of 1550.50 feet, and a chord which bears N7525'02"E — 653.23 feet; Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 658.16 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left which hos a central angle of 90'00.00% a radius of 45.00 feet, and a chord which bears N4234'40"E — 63.64 feet; • Along said curve to the left, on ore distance of 70.69 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE N8734'40"E a distance of 90.98 feet; THENCE S0225'20"E a distance of 35.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left which hos a central angle of 7312'27". a radius of 10.00 feet, and a chord which bears S39.01'39"E — 11.93 feet; Along said curve to the left, on arc distance of 12.78 feet to the end of said curve in the west line of the aforementioned SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition; THENCE S00'09'22"E along the west line of said SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition, a distance of 131.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 109,754 squar- or 2.5196 acres of land, more or less. • • 1R. ' • PIBU. , • • • • ('.,,* 3689 ^`'q. 8B-7 - i• °so • : • sda ... . EXHIBIT B . R.O.W. ABANDONMENT , M TF'-IBM ADDITION NO. 1 ............"589;47;42.5.7-. VOL. 388-211, PG. 68 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS • - IJS5.22" • 0. .' R.. Ck. I... .342. 6' al.. /1/40585 7'W- 341.22' . SCALE: 1. 2C(3' I '.G.". k w. MERLIN SURVEY A/1588 DENTON CO. \ W. mEDLIN SURVEY A/1958 TARRANT CO, . BLOCK A . . . . 'Kr . .... •*-- -.4 .2, - ck, W. MEDLIN SURVEY A/1958 U.P. MARTIN SURVEY A/1075 MTP-1BM P. 9 Rifle • , 11. '1 Vol 388-211, %,.. .8 • . . BLOCK B ' LOT 4 ,n co A mr- . . >-14 L5 >a cc n ) r- n v1 G ch o z C4 ------- %. 2,E C2 . )# 21112c LOT lil e_ acres .rip ...,.... c1910 .%I JP.. ....,,,.::... 2,..• - ,n 50‘,---...nut.z:•• N.1 -_ vle.r, ,. :::....::••• L 1 . A- 'f',4-- :_:_:,::: • CI ..- ,,. .9fhifi._ , :,,,...... • ii Q...: '‘S.52.4.;,0:;:.$, r c.? SABRE GROUP CAMPUS 4, . .....f'..'.:... LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1 .,4,r if r:•••MURK JR. 0. (PROPOSED) .;:./''......,:...........kr..., LOT 1 eY0, 3689 jib, -70V°PEsM°V,/` . d•.. .....;,1 \ 8B-8 R.O.W. ABANDONMENT MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1 VOL. 388--211, PG. 68 CITY 'OF SOUTNLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO.. TEXAS • CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC CH BRNG LC C1 2419116" 1419.50 602.55 S 7525'02" W 598.04 C2 24'19'16" 1550,50 658.16 N 7575'02" E 653.23 i C3 90 00'00" 45.00 70.69 N 42'34'40" E 63.64 C4 7312`27" 10.00 12.78 S 39'01'39" E 11.93 i 1 ; LINE TABLE LINE BEARING `DISTANCE Li S 67'34'40" W 137.89' L2 S 6315'25" W 32.25' • L3 N 26'44'35" W .131.00' L4 N 6315'25" E 32.25' L5 N 87'34'40" E 90,98' • L6 S 0275'20" E 35.00' • ,LT S 00'09'22" E 131.53' i i • 8B-9 Vit. of3 4AN. 2000 • QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § § NOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Southlake ("Grantor"), does hereby bargain, sell, release, vacate, abandon and forever quitclaim unto: First Security Bank, National Association, as Owner Trustee, ("Grantee") and any and all of its successors or assigns, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the property described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes (the "Property"). This conveyance is being made by Grantor and accepted by Grantee subject to all easements, restrictions, rights, encumbrances and other matters described in Exhibit"C" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes (collectively, the "Permitted Exceptions"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the Property unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, subject to the Permitted Exceptions,so that neither Grantor nor its legal representatives or assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the Property or appurtenances or any part thereof. EXECUTED this day of , 2001. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, GRANTOR By: MAYOR STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of 2001, by . Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission Expires: Type or Print Notary's Name 8B-10 W:1Southlake'.Deeds\SABRE.Quitclaim.wpd Page 1 • Return to: City Secretary City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Grantee: The SABRE Group, Inc. • 4255 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 Attention: General Counsel • • 8B-11 W:ISouthlakelDeedsISABRE.Quitdaim.wpd Pam 2 EXHIBIT A R.O.W. ABANDONMENT MTP—iBM ADDITION NO. 1 VOL. 388-211, PG. 68 CiTY OF SOUTNLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS BEING a 2.5196 acre (109,754 sq. ft.) tract of land situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, Tarrant County, Texas, also being all of Kirkwood Boulevard (131' R.O.W.), dedicated as Parkway Boulevard by MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1, on addition to the City of Southloke according to the Final Plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 2.5196 acre tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING of the southeast corner of said MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1, at the re-entrant corner in the west line of SABRE GROUP CAMPUS, LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1, a proposed addition to the City of Southlake; THENCE clang the west line of said SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition, common with the south line of the aforementioned Kirkwood Boulevard, the following: S8734.40"W a distance of 137.89-feet to the beginning of a curve to the left which hos a central angle of 2419'16; a radius of 1419.50 feet, and a chord which bears S7525'02"W - 598.04 feet; Along said curve to the left, and arc distance of 602.55 feet to the end of said curve; • S63'15'251W o distance of 32.25 feet to the southerly end of the westerly terminus • line of said Kirkwood Boulevard, in the easterly line of State Highway No. 114 (variable width R.O.W.); THENCE N26'44'35"W along the westerly terminus line of said Kirkwood Boulevard, with the easterly line of said State Highway No. 114, a distance of 131.00 feet to the northwesterly corner of said Kirkwood Boulevard; • THENCE departing the easterly line of said State Highway No. 114 and along the northerly line of said Kirkwood Boulevard the following: N6315'25"E a distance of 32.25 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right which has a central angle of 2419'16", o radius of 1550.50 feet, and a chord which bears N7525'02"E - 653.23 feet; Along said curve to the right, on arc distance of 658.16 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left which has a central angle of 90'00'00", a radius of 45.00 feet, and a chord which bears N42 34'40"E - 63.64 feet; • Along said curve to the left, on arc distance of 70.69 feet to the end of said curve; THENCE N8734'40"E a distance of 90.98 feet; THENCE S0225'20"E a distance of 35.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left which hos a central angle of 7312'27", a radius of 10.00 feet, and a chord which bears S39'01'39"E - 11.93 feet; Along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 12.78 feet to the end of said curve in the west line of the aforementioned SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition; THENCE SO0'09'22"E along the west line of said SABRE GROUP CAMPUS addition, a distance of 131.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 109,754 squor- or 2.5196 acres of land, more or less. •. PIM' , JR. ...,.... • 4"•, 3689 ��. 8B-12 ' j•.�S•. • UADrra WW1 - 7 e•u 4 • EXHIBIT B . . . . • R.O.W. ABANDONMENT 589.4,-251 ' MTP—IBM ADDITION NO. 1 • ...../..." 9.34. VOL. 388-211, PG. 68• 11 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 11_ DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS 11-. 1.355'22- R. 1406. 0 C‹ 0.1.• NC5C8.57-W— .341.22. SCA 1 . 0 / ,,...... . • LE: t-m2c0' .k: . k:• W. MEDLIN SURVEY A/1588 DENTON CO. ,. W. MEDLIN SURVEY A/1958 TARRANT CO. BLOCK A . . . . 0 ...... . . . • -.5c- .44- ... 0 A. -O W. MEDLIN SURVEY A/7958 U.P. MARTIN SURVEY A/1075 • MTP-IBM P. 9 9/Ti• ' • I. 1 • Vol 388-211, ':. .8 . . . . BLOCK B , LOT 4 ., . inio . a- . '1: • , • +,, , )•••lai Y L5 GO P ct - cri in • 0 z C4 --- %SI, C2 ..')°' :-.t ca•: 4/ ' r— LOT . • V I' z c-.06 aCre„Scv R0 ..".-. 3 1 a•- -1" i•-••• .. ::•.:.:.-.1,... nn Elu-'7-. :t---• • , k.4 ,,,,,,,,:%4'Qt.,-:.,............. Li A iiii 1.....e.. .,:: i:Y.:- • . . . Ili:.) ...•-• at; OFMi• :.1::..:,• • C I :..g I 4, . iy . i• .. ' - • '' . ,-- 0 SABRE GROUP CAMPUS • 1 ' ' LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1 , . •11. 4 f ,f.r • • •BURN, JR.. \-e2' (PROPOSED) '"./P.......:...........1...._. , . (..,.%-'3,0 3689 I-Fot . , . LOT 1 • ' 7,6riSpE s0:02, • • ' ... .•4‘ • \. 8B-13 • tLi'i • • R.O.W. ABANDONMENT MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1 VOL. 388-211, PG. 68 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DENTON AND TARRANT CO., TEXAS CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC CH BRNG LC • Cl 2419116" 1419.50 602.55 S 75 25'02" W 598.04 C2 2419116" 1550.50 658.16 N 75'25'02" E 653.23 C3 90'00'00" 45.00 70.69 N 42 34'40" E 63.64 C4 7312'27" 10.00 12.78 S 39'01'39" E 11.93 • • LINE TABLE • LINE BEARING DISTANCE Li S 87 34'40" W 137.89' L2 S 6315'25" W 32.25' L3 N 26'44'35" W 131.00' L4 N 6315'25" E 32.25' L5 N 87 34'40" E 90.98' • L6 S 02 25'20" E - 35.00' L7 S 00'09'22" E 131.53' 8B-14 MARCH 2000 Sht. .3 of.3 Exhibit C PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS 1. The rights of all existing utilities located in the Property. 2. Emergency Access Easement reserved by Grantor for the purpose of ingress, egress, access, and passage to and across the Property for emergency police,fire, ambulance and other public safety vehicles and personnel. This Emergency Access Easement is a private easement to be maintained by Grantee, its successors and assigns. This Emergency Access Easement is subject to Grantee's right to have access controls that are approved by the City of Southlake's Fire Marshal. This Emergency Access Easement terminates upon approval and installation of a permanent two-way access road from Kirkwood Boulevard to "old" T.W. King Road by the Texas Department of Transportation. • 3. Drainage and Utility Easement reserved by Grantor within the Property for the installation, maintenance,and operation of water,sewer,electric,telephone,cable, gas,and other similar utilities and for the overland or underground transfer of storm water. The Property shall not have any permanent structures, fences, or other obstacles hindering (1)the safe transfer of water through the easement or(2)the installation, maintenance, and operation of utilities; provided, however, Grantee shall have the right to install such permanent structures on the surface as are reasonably necessary to achieve the access control approved by the City of Southlake's Fire Marshal, subject to the right of Grantor, its officers, agents, servants and employees to install, operate, and maintain utilities. • • 8B-15 W:lSouthlakelDeedsISABRE.Quitclaim.wpd Page 4 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned,as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard as described on the attached exhibits. TXU ElectIc/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: W• �� v Signed: Printed Name:WODNE' tAt• t i 1-I Printed Name: Title: (j.TtL t Ty -DE St L t S( . Title: • Date: 3-8-Co Date: GTE Central,Inc. Southwestern Bell Telephone Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Charter Communications Signed: Printed Name: Title: Date: 8B-16 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of T.W King Road as described on the attached exhibits. TXU Electric/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: Signed: • "/)41fD Printed Name: Printed Name:IceT 0. EAuniEfkle Title: Title: P/44/44C-it — A/iwCm4Af DI%rieacT ' Date: Date: 3-1 Zoo GTE Central,Inc. Southwestern Bell Telephone Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date:- Charter Communications Signed: Printed Name: Title: Date: 8B-17 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of T.W King Road as described on the attached exhibits. TXU Electric/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: GTE Central,Inc. Southwestern Bell Telephone Signed: AA, /L.e4_. i Signed: Printed Name: Soh Ill 1-1-f5 f?/" Printed Name: Title: 54 E-(vh A-L956 /QQ I4>) Title: Date: 3 - Date: Charter Communications Signed: Printed Name: Title: Date: 8B-18 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of T.W King Road as described on the attached exhibits. TXU Electric/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: GTE Central,Inc. Southwestern Bell Telephone Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Charter C mmunications Signed: Vatt- Printed Name: Id CAC(y MS-La./4411,V! Title: 1k4i ce p yd y Date: 5. - 01 8B-19 Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We,the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies,hereby express no objection to the abandonment of a portion of Kirkwood Boulevard as described on the attached exhibits. TXU Electric/Gas Tri-County Electric Cooperative,Inc. Signed: Signed: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: GTE Central,Inc. Southwester ell Te}Ephone Signed: Signed: c� � Printed Name: Printed Name: G�i (�tI �t1 Title: Title: A4 ca-r,-a-5.obiJ-e Date: Date: Y3/.2 7/470 Charter Communications Signed: Printed Name: Title: Date:. 8B-20 City of Southlake, Texas • STAFF REPORT March 31, 2000 CASE NO: ZA 99-139 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-332/First Reading/Rezoning and Site Plan- 114 Kimball Square STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Interim Planning Director, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Senior Planner,481-5581, ext. 787 Attached is a letter from the applicant requesting to table this item to the June 6, 2000, City Council meeting. N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\99CASES\99-139ZS.doc • • Sc- ( MAR.31.2000 3:15AM DAN MATISE REALTY SERVICE N0.927 P.1 4 ii M.% ODE saEsLav ®Z VIGE • 111/1 j March 30, 2000 Mr. Dennis Killough Via fax #817/488-9370 Senior Planner City of Southlake 1721 E. Southlake Blvd. Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: ZA 99-139 114 Kimball Square, Ltd. Southlake, Texas . Dear Mr. Killough: I request the City of Southlake's consideration of the referenced site plan and rezoning be tabled until June 6, 2000. In continued response to the neighbor's request to relieve them of water S drainage from several sources our engineers, after a thorough investigation of all options, are preparing a drainage plan and seeking the City Engineer's approval and recommendation. This entails obtaining many more Topographic shots with 25' contours in a concentrated area of the northern part of the tract as well as analyzing information obtained from the Texas Department of Transportation on their projected 114 drainage which will provide further relief to our property and adjacent homeowners. May 1, 2000 we expect to present a formal resubmission with related technical and professional support. • Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincer/7 . ati e DVM/dg REGO rVu-d k 3 0 2000 So P.O.B0x 12248 Lea Dallas,Texas 75225 Management COMMERCIAL/INVESTMENT PROPERTIES 214/363-8504 ge-2 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services (x757) SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Scope of Services Agreement with Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) Action Requested: City Council consideration of a scope of services agreement with Call A Ride of Southlake (CARS) to provide transportation services to disabled and senior citizens of Southlake. Background Information: Based on information from the survey conducted by the United Way- Northeast Senior Issues Committee, the Senior Advisory Commission formed a Transportation subcommittee in June of 1998 to study the need for senior transportation. A survey of active seniors in Southlake, and of services offered in neighboring cities was initiated. In October 1998, Dick Johnston presented a proposal for the Commission to study. Members of the Transportation subcommittee met with the Executive Directors of both Care Corps and Northeast Transportation Services (NETS), and expressed their concern to the Senior Advisory Commission that those service agencies could not meet the needs the committee hoped to address. At their April 13, 1999 meeting, the Senior Advisory Commission voted to present Mr. Johnston's proposal for a transportation service to City Council for consideration. On June 8, 1999 the Senior Advisory Commission met with Councilmembers Debra Edmondson and Ronnie Kendall and Community Services staff to discuss the concept. The consensus of the seniors present was that a separate non-profit organization be formed to recruit, train and schedule volunteers to provide transportation to those in need. The non-profit organization could contract with the City, as well as pursue other sources of funding such as corporate sponsors and grants. The topic was discussed with City Council at its June budget retreat. Some concern was raised as to the extent of the need for the services, and the level of City support being requested. A transportation survey was conducted by Public Information Officer James Kunke, of all senior citizen registered voters in Southlake. Approximately one thousand surveys were mailed, and 142 responses received. The results of the survey are included as an attachment to this memo. ion- Billy Campbell, City Manager March 31, 2000 Page 2 Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) was organized as a non-profit corporation in November, 1999, and a board of directors established. Since then, CARS has established its operating policies, recruited and trained volunteer drivers, and established a dispatch service. CARS began offering transportation services in January, 2000. The Executive Committee of the CARS Board of Directors reviewed the proposed agreement and decided to present it to the entire board. A meeting of the Board was scheduled for Friday, March 3, 2000. Subsequent to this meeting, the Executive Committee of the CARS Board of Directors met again and proposed several changes to the agreement proposed by the City. The changes proposed by CARS are shown as a strike-through/bold..mark up copy of the agreement attached. Changes are noted by the paragraph side bars. The changes proposed by CARS are: • City pay the additional insurance premium necessary to have the City named as an additional insured on CARS automobile liability coverage, not to exceed $700. • City provide office space to CARS, and pay for any necessary relocation costs associated with moving CARS base of operations. • City pay CARS a total of $22,500, payable as an initial amount of $15,000 upon signing of the contract, and the remaining $7,500 payable on July 1, 2000. • Some wording changes in Section 4, including addition of "liaison" to clause that allows City access to CARS operational records and budget reports. • Change to indemnification clause. • Removal of clause that requires CARS to refund to City any unexpended funds paid by City if CARS ceases to provide transportation services due to termination of the contract by either party. Financial Considerations: The agreement proposed by CARS calls for a payment to CARS of$22,500. The approved FY 1999-2000 Community Services division budget allocated $83,500 for community services, of which $43,500 has been approved by City Council to other requesting organizations. Citizen Input/ Board Review: - .The Senior Advisory Commission supported the concept of a senior transportation service, having discussed the issue at several'meetings, and voting at its April 13, 1999 meeting, to make a formal proposal to City Council. Councilmembers Edmondson and Kendall attended the June 8, 1999 Senior Advisory Committee meeting to discuss the concept. /0A- Billy Campbell, City Manager March 31, 2000 Page 3 Legal Review: The City Attorney has reviewed the scope of services agreement proposed by CARS. Alternatives: • Changes in funding amount as determined by City Council. • Denial of scope of services agreement with Call A Ride of Southlake Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include: • Revised Agreement Between City of Southlake and Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. • Response to Senior Citizen Transportation Survey • CARS February rider data • CARS financial statement for March 3, 2000 • CARS Business Plan and Plan of Operation • CARS By-laws • CARS Finance Summary • CARS Operation Manual • CARS Users List and Drivers List Staff Recommendation: Place on the April 4, 2000 City Council agenda, consideration of scope of services agreement with Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS). KH /M3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AND CALL A RIDE OF SOUTHLAKE,INC. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Southlake, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation located in Tarrant County and Denton County, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized City Manager (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc., a non-profit corporation of Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized • Chairman (hereinafter referred to as "CARS"), an organization which has qualified for exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. WHEREAS, the purpose of CARS is to provide non-emergency transportation to senior citizens and disabled persons ("qualified persons"); and WHEREAS, City and CARS desire to enter into an Agreement whereby CARS will provide free non-emergency transportation to qualified residents of the Southlake Community and participants in programs offered by the Southlake Senior Activity Center; NOW,THEREFORE, KNOWN BY ALL THESE PRESENT: That City and CARS, in consideration of the mutual undertakings hereunder set forth, do hereby covenant and agree as follows: SECTION 1 • SCOPE OF SERVICES A. CARS shall provide the following services: (1) CARS will provide on-call transportation for qualified persons of the City as follows: • (a) Disabled individuals (of any age) or senior citizens (over the age of 55 years) and, (b) are residents of Southlake, (c) whose physical condition permits them to be transported by the drivers and vehicles available. (2) CARS will provide transportation to the persons identified in Section A. (1) above: (a) to and from non-emergency medical appointments, dental appointments, and health care providers located within a 25 mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activity Center; (b) for personal need,including necessary essentials, i.e.,to and from the grocery store, drug store, bank, personal grooming, social activities, etc., located within a seven(7) mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activity Center. ina"1j \\SLKSV2001\LOCAL\COMMUNITY SERVICES\99 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-C.DOCPage 1 (3) CARS shall riot be obligated to transport disabled individuals for whom CARS is unable to provide safe transportation. (6)(4) •CARS shall operate solely in accordance with its bylaws as follows: (a) Volunteer drivers who use their own vehicles shall provide the transportation services. CARS shall recruit, qualify, and train these drivers. (b) Transportation services will be provided Monday through Friday during the hours between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, or by special arrangement. (c) Transportation normally will be scheduled at least 24 hours prior to departure. (5) CARS will maintain detailed records of qualified persons served, trip destinations and mileage driven, driver and other qualifications, revenues received, and cost and expenses incurred. B. CITY shall provide the following service • (1) City agrees to publicize the services of CARS within selected current City mailings, on the City's Cable Television Channel and other means at the discretion of the City. (2) (2) City shall name a staff contact person to serve as a liaison between City and CARS. (3) Funds to cover additional insurance premium to have the City named as an additional insured on CARS automobile liability insurance coverage, not to exceed $700. (4) Office space for CARS operations, computers,telephones, etc. Said office space to be agreeable to CARS with City to pay relocation costs, moving of telephones, advertising costs, etc. if relocation is necessary. SECTION 2 GOVERNANCE A. CARS shall be solely governed by its board of directors,who shall meet in accordance with the bylaws. The time, date, place and agenda of these board meetings shall be the responsibility of CARS. SECTION 3 PAYMENT FOR SERVICES 10A-4 \\SLKSV2001\LOCAL\COMMUNITY SERVICES\99 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-C.DOCPage 2 regarding ridership, City agrees to a one-time payment of$10,000 for the term-of-this contract to be ..pplie towards the costs of the following: ❑ with ackLeiztiging CARS ce-rArice to Soithlake residents. nTelephone an 1 other utilities associate with dispatching volunteer`lrivers Rent of office space from which to coordinate operations of CARS. - Personnel expenses. In recognition that the City elected to support a volunteer group establishing the senior and disabled citizens transportation program rather than provide such service as a City owned community transportation service, and that CARS is in its initial start-up year of operations, having commenced transporting qualified users in January 2000 as promised, City agrees to a $22,500 stipend to be paid to CARS; (1) $15,000 upon the signing of this contract, and (2) $7,500 to be paid on July 1,2000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. SECTION 4 REPORTING A. CARS shall generate and provide to the City quarterly reports which shall include ridership information showing the number of riders and the types of trips. CARS shall also provide expenditure records related to operating expenses,i.e.,rent,telephone,utilities,printing and supplies, insurance and personnel expenses. City liaison shall have access to CARS operational records and all budget reports, during CARS normal business hours. B. CARS shall provide the City information, if requested,necessary for the City to conduct an annual performance evaluation including,but not limited to the following: (1) Ridership audits including response time; a) (3}-On-time analysis;0444 b) -C„stonier satisfaction user surveys. SECTION 5 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION A. CARS shall provide City proof of automobile liability insurance coverage with minimum limits of$250,000/$500,000,with City as an additional named insured,with any additional • premium to be paid by the City as per Section 1 above. B. CARS AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL 1OA4 \\SLKSV2001\LOCAL\COMMUNITY SERVICES\99 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-C.DOCPage 3 PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER,WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF CARS, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT., WHETHER OR NOT CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY THE NEGLICENCB OF CITY, ITS OFFICERS, CARS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES OR LIABILITY FOUND BY A COURT TO HAVE ARISEN FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF THE CITY,ITS OFFICERS,AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES. SECTION 6 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR In performing the services hereunder, CARS is acting as an independent contractor, and City shall have no power to direct or supervise its activities in carrying out its responsibilities under this Agreement. SECTION 7 TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from February January 1, 2000 through September 30, 2000. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, either party may terminate this contract upon 45 days written notice to the other. r 4; tAR4Matiol C AuS cease agr4Gme,nt. This Agreement sets forth all the agreements between the parties and no modification shall be effective unless reduced to writing and signed by the party to be changed therewith. This document may be executed in duplicate originals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and CARS have executed this agreement as of this day of , 2000. CALL A RIDE OF SOUTHLAKE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: By: Dick Johnston, PresidentChairman Rick Stacy, Mayor IOAi \\SLKSV2001\LOCAL\COMMUNITY SERVICES\9 'SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-C.DOCPage 4 ATTEST: ATTEST: Notary Public in and for the State of City Secretary Texas Type/Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: • I A* 4/ \\SLKSV2001\LOCAL\COMMUNITY SERVICES\99 SERVICE AGREEMENTS\CARSSOS99-C.DOCPage 5 Sttnid'19 Plo. Response to Senior Citizen Transportation Survey Approximately, 1000 surveys concerning senior citizen transportation were mailed to senior citizens who were also registered voters. Of the 1,000 surveys mailed there were 142 viable responses. The break down of the responses is: Would you currently use senior transportation if one were available? YES-28 NO-115 NO RESPONSE-0 Do you anticipate that within the next five years you would use this service? YES-44 NO-88 NO RESPONSE-11 If either answer is yes, how often would you expect to use such a service? 26-MORE THAN ONCE PER WEEK 20-ONCE OR TWICE PER MONTH 27-ONCE PER WEEK 0-LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH For what purposes might you use a senior transportation service? 71-Medical Appointments 68- Senior Activity Center Events 58-Shopping 15-City Council or Other Meetings 2-Employment 37-City Festivals 23-Other Recreation 14-Other Some of the responses for "other" given were banking, church,when too old to drive, airport, and other unspecified reasons. Would you be willing to pay a nominal fee for each trip? YES-108 NO-6 NO RESPONSE-28 Questions were raised on this question concerning what is a nominal fee. Do you support the city's participation in a senior transportation service? YES-123 NO-8 NO RESPONSE-11 Some of the respondents indicated that they wanted the service to be privately provided. Others said they would support the service dependent upon its cost. Others wanted it to be funded through already existing revenue and did not want to pay extra taxes for the service. A couple of residents took the time to write letters concerning their views on this issue. Copies of the letters are attached. • iahi_ . . ,,,..v .._, (/ _... • - Jr' Yi -",r -ay, -P-7/- Ci 2( tz . r a. e 7 f yi j / 1/1 01- " 4717 :_' _..1_7_ --- --- • - - - • i. -(/ -- ,,,,-., - • I _ ......„.„..p , ,--ty- --r- (12-raii. ''-'12d/i 41_,2_W 144'122/_X Vr • _7--- b . 4 .. i. c.72,_„t:a.17. -,_.4 , cr-' il7'.2 "73/ rvP7(72., ry -- i, -n2 --r14,2 l ftlY1 77 72 -"71; it/P2iC 7jir 27 9 -?-i. ' . r.14/ "IV"- - `19 , -2Yir'• •)::-)7)47 ' f, ( -r131#4,7*--.'-' -4..:. 4777 7 .6, -.7-\--(--t.X.717. r 1 (//_+..--• ... i /f 14,...-- ,,,Ar rr, ,, f ii• r.' /0,7,.. , v ( erWie../liad-r2,1p - --- - 1 i /Pi tripV .-714ge -44 1 ------ '"r.C.,(Y „_,_,,,,. . -: 700. 1-0 ' ?11"(1) . ‘rtl'I',42r-?<ki 7 .3rX • 1 ''.1 I 1 -74-45r../--.,/ , 1,-- a L._ • , • __, ;; - - .7 i —w-p- 1 : 4/4 --o z 711/ fra/( __it— 771,(244/ cFC:77 1 . . C . —vcji177ZZ.411Fop L ./ 91/ i i • ../ IV . t_g /7 ..--7--1 - , .. .1,1 . / ,7 rr- C-a-_-L.129 -'4172.7 _,.3-"' u 7; , ,en,a, , ., , b' 2. -2. ---w- 2-2.- ,,,,,,—„-fre,, ._..., ./.46i '2/ 11'W7-41 ...,-- / . Juno e-mail printed Sat, 4 Sep 1999 13:35:48 , page 1 From: mer-arg Pull-Name: MERRILL D STACY • - 'o: mer-arg@juno.com Subject: Sept .4,99 Senior Transportation Plan X-Status: Unsent Mr Kunke , Roy and I are returning the questionaires as you requested. It is important to us that you not think we don't-consider this a good program We are fortunate enough at this time to be able to take care of our own transportation . However , who knows what will happen to anyone in the next five years We also are blessed with having our family living in Southiake , and would likely never need this transportation. However , I feel quite sure there are many citizens in Southiake who do not have family available , due to work schedules or distance and could consider this type of service very helpful. If our circumstances were different I would be delighted to pay a nominal fee for transportation to the doctor or the grocery store and / or outings that might also be provided with this type of service If the City of Southlake can afford to put this type fo service in motion , we would think it would be a great thing to do for those who do now or may come to a point in life that they would need it Thank you for your consideration for the Seniors of our community Sincerely , 72jii2i2zij 0 .C5z7 Merrill and Roy Stacy 320 N Shady Oaks .Dr Southiake , TX 76092 6151 31 - 3257 o A- 11 W v O Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. 5. . Monthly Summary of Service Provided to Seniors and Handicapped -71 January February March April May June Newly Qalified Users 32 4 Total Qualified Users 32 36 Total Vohnteer Drivers 17 23 Undupliatcd Users served this Month 14 14 VolunteerDrivers Used this Month 7 9 Driver Mics Traveled 302 572 Driver Heirs 13.5 32.5 Office Vounteer Hours 113 111 n 0 m lionow. co' 421 One WayTrips: III Medical/Dental 4 7 -63 ' Southlakc Senior Center 19 29 Personal Needs 4 8 to Shopping 0 2 0 Business 0 0 Other Senior Centers 0 2 Other 4 0 Total On(Way Trips: 31 48 Rider Grcup: Seniors >55 31 48 Handicapped 0 0 Total 31 48 Note:The First User was transported on 1/11/2000 Corrected 3/7/2000 c� m N Call A Ride of Southlake,Inc. March 3,2000 Opening Balance 11/29/1999 $700.00 Donation Receipts $3,341.00 Loan Receipts $5,000.00 TOTAL RECEIPTS: $9,041.00 Disbursements: Insurance Expense $2,142.26 Telephone Expense $ 597.09 Fees $ 525.00 Supplies $ 906.82 Rent $1,500.00 TOTAL EXPENSES: $5,671.17 Bringing Balance to: $3,369.83 Respectfully submitted by:/n C( r y f �'`�`'/ March 3, 00 J I e'F 13.. Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. A Transportation Service for Senior Citizens and Disabled.Persons BUSINESS PLAN Year 1 - 1/1/2000 to, 12/.31/2000 Recruit Volunteer Drivers and Staff Persons. Drivers will provide information on the type and capacity of their vehicle, insurance coverage, and whether or not they can handle wheel chairs. The Staff Persons will receive telephoned requests from Qualified Users for transportation and dispatch those requests to Volunteer Drivers who will provide the service.- Senior Citizens and Disabled will be encourage to use the CARS service through advertising and notices in the print media and having speakers appearing before groups of citizens, i.e., Senior Citizen Organizations,Rotary Club,Lions Club, Southlake Womens Club, Southlake Newcomers Club, Chamber of Commerce, etc., with a program presentation. We will keep detailed statistics covering the number of rides requested, number of rides and riders transported, type of transportation provided, i.e., medical, dental, business, social, personal care, etc. We will keep detailed records on revenues received from all sources and the expenditures made to carry our the program. We will write Policy and Operation Guides for CARS and Job Descriptions for the officers and committee chairpersons to help ensure that quality service is provided at all times. When requirements justify, perhaps by 4/1/2000 we will hire a contract person to oversee the program, initially probably half days or two and one half days per week. Once we have fine tuned our operations,we will consider expanding the program to include nearby Northeast Tarrant County/Denton County Cities, i.e.,Roanoke,Trophy Club,Keller, Westlake, Grapevine, and Colleyville. Expansion would not come before July 2000 and only with Volunteer Drivers and Stipends from any city included in the program. The main office for operations will remain in Southlake. Once we have a strong base of Users, we will consider adding one or two vans to our program which will be equipped for transportation of Users in wheel chairs. These vans would be leased or owned and will be maintained by CARS. We estimate CARS will transport 1400 Users - Seniors and Disabled-covering 30,800 miles in the initial year of operation. _ Year 2 - 1/1/2001 to 12/31/2001 New Directors will be added to the Board of Directors replacing those whose terms expire. New Officers will be elected to operate CARS. The CARS program will continue to transport Users it Volunteer Vehicles driven by Vo'"nteer Drivers. IoAft • If ridership justifies, we will add;CARS owned vehicles to the program which will require garages and additional rent and contract labor, gas, oil, and maintenance. If nearby cities desire to be included in the program, we will modify and/or amend the Bylaws, Policy and Procedure Guides, etc.,to accommodate these changes. We will always look for ways to improve the program, to add efficiency and to make participation in the program as attractive as possible to both Users and Volunteers. We estimate CARS will double its initial year in the number of Users transported and miles driven. BUDGETS Year 2000 2001 Anticipated Revenue $40,000 $60,000 Anticipated Expenses Fund Raising $2,000 $2,000 Contract Labor $18,000 $24,000 Rent and Utilities $6,000 $9,000 Telephone $2,000 $2,200 Postage and Copying $1,200 $1,300 Printing $500 $600 Supplies $1,000 $1,200 Insurance $5,000 $5,000 Volunteer Recognition $800 $1,900 Publicity $1,500 $1,600 Miscellaneous* $2,000 $11,200 J Total $40,000 $60,000 * Includes reserve for Handicapped Equipped Vehicle lease or purchase. • PLAN OF OPERATION- CALL A RIDE OF SO UTHLAKE, INC. Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc,. (CARS), a not for profit corporation has been established in Southlake, TX. It's purpose is to provide free non-emergency transportation to Southlake area seniors and disabled citizens for medical, dental, social, business, shopping and personal needs. The program is offered Monday through Friday to City of Southlake seniors and disabled residents and those area senior citizens who are active in the Southlake Senior Activity Center programs. CARS will transport within a twenty-five (25) mile radius of Southlake for medical purposes and within a seven (7). mile radius of Southlake for purposes other than medical as listed above. CARS has elected a Board of Directors and Officers, approved By-Laws and established the years $40,000 Operating Budget for the initial year 2000. Office space has been rented at 181 Grand Ave., Suite 209 in Southlake Town Square and telephone service being installed. The goal is to transport "users" beginning in January 2000. Individuals, business organizations, charitable groups and the City of Southlake are being solicited for donations to make this program become a reality. The transportation for users will be on a no fee basis with donation envelopes available for those able and wishing to donate to CARS. CARS is a Volunteer dependent program. Volunteer Drivers with sedans, vans and hopefully wheelchair lift equipped vehicles who are'willing to furnish, maintain and provide gas and oil will make up the core of the organizations drivers. Commitments to drive will be in half(1/2) day units. All volunteers, office support and drivers, will need to fill out a Volunteer Application form. A driving record review for drivers is required. We want to encourage senior citizens to be more active in the various recreation and social functions offered in Southlake and near by areas CARS can do the driving for safer and less stressful'transportation. Senior citizens and disabled who need or desire to utilize CARS will complete an application and interview. . A User will be required to make transportation arrangements by calling CARS at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance. A Volunteer dispatcher will make arrangements with the Volunteer Drivers to contact the User for • pick up and transport arrangements to the destination requested. Depending on the time frame (I/2 day units), the same Volunteer Driver may or may not pick up and return the User to their home. Volunteer Driver time and travel records (trip logs), will be maintained for record purposes If a User has a special handling need, such as a wheelchair equipped van, and it is not available in the Volunteer fleet, the User will be referred to Northeast Transportation System (NETS). This will be necessary until a wheelchair equipped van can be obtained by CARS - possibly in the year 2001 or 2002. R. F. (Dick) Johnston 817/421-4227 Chairman of the Board Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. • CARS , Call A"Ride of Southlake, Inca ' " BYLAWS ARTICLE I NAME'AND ADDRESS:.. . The Corporation shall he known as Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. (CARS) ' ' 181' Grand Avenue, Suite 209 Southlake, Texas'76092 ' • ARTICLE .II MISSION: :CARS is a voluntary service Corporation providing non- emergency transportation to Senior Citizens, Disabled Persons , and.other qualified individuals in and around Southlake, Texas. • ARTICLE " III SPONSORSHIP: • CARS Sponsors will include any interested religious,organization governmental body, civic °group business, charity or individual that wishes.. to' participate and/or is willing to provide the Corporation annual financial support. ARTICLE IV BOARD OF DIRECTORS: The CARS Board of Directors shall determine' and enforce all policies and procedures. Any change in policy or procedure must be voted on and passed by simple majority of'the Board members present at a properly scheduled Board meeting, notice of which having been published"at least ten (10) days prior to such meeting. Such notice shall include the mailing of the , proposed changes to all Board members: 1 . The Board of Directors shall have seven (7) or more members. The members shall include the officers,'of CARS (the CARS Executive Committee), CARS Sponsors, and individual CARS . volunteers. • r '. 2. Approximately one-half of the Board members shall be elected annually to staggered terms.of :two: years. No member shall serve more than two terms (plus any partial term they may have been serving) without being absent from the board for at least one year. 3. The Board shall meet, at:least quarterly or when called into session by the_Executive. Committee to review financial reports; hear reports , :from _the .Executive Director, committee chairpersons,:or'representatives of the Advisory Council; and take any 'necessary . actions. One-third (;) of the current membership shall comprise a quorum of the Board. • 4. At a regularly scheduled meeting held each November, the Board shall elect from its members officers (Chairperson, Vice- Chairperson, 'Secretary,, Treasurer) to serve from January 1 to December:31 .of the following year. If an officer, other than Chairperson is unable to complete 'a term, the Board shall, within thirty (30) days, call for the election of a replacement to serve the unexpired term. If the vacancy is that of Chairperson, the Vice-Chairperson.. shall. ;become Chairperson and a new Vice-Chairperson shall be elected. • 5. Minutes, including a financial report and a record of any actions taken shall be kept of.each Board: meeting.. Board minutes shall be on file at the CARS corporate offices. b. The Board has the -authority to create paid positions, including that of Executive Director. ARTICLE v- EXECUTIVE..COMMITTEE:: 1 . The Executive Committee.: of shall consist of. the officers of - CARS (Chairperson,.Vice-Chairperson,.Secretary, Treasurer). 2. The Executive , Committee shall be responsible for the 'implementation of the policies and procedures set by the Board of Directors. . 3. The Executive:Committee shall meet monthly, but not less than - eight (8) times.per year. - . . 4. The Executive Committee shall, upon the Board's direction, engage the services of an Executive Director or, acting as a :;iotlf • • committee; of the .whole,: assume the responsibilities of the Executive Director whenever.;that position is unfilled. 5. The duties and responsibilities of the Executive Committee members shall be as follows: A. Chairperson, The Chairperson shall- be the chief executive . officer of _CARS, and. `as such shall be responsible for its general direction and control (within the scope of the policies. and :procedures adopted by the Board). The chairperson:shall preside at.all, meetings of CARS and the CARS Executive Committee. .. B. . Vice-Chairperson in.:_the. _ absence or disability of the Chairperson, the Vice-Chairperson shall perform all of the duties of the Chairperson, and when so acting shall have all powers of, and be subject to all restrictions on, the Chairperson. Upon the resignation of the Chairperson or at the.expiry,of the term of the Chairperson, the Vice- Chairperson shall elevate to the office of Chairperson, first serving any unexpired term of the outgoing Chairperson. . • C. , Secretary` The Secretary shall ensure that adequate minutes are taken and .Fled of record for all meetings of CARS and/or its Executive, Committee. The Secretary shall be responsible for the dissemination of timely meeting notices and shall be empowered to sign or.attest any documents as,'=required -by law, or the business of CARS. D. Treasurer The Treasurer shall be .responsIble for maintaining all books of accounts as required by law, regulation, or the 'business of CARS. The Treasurer shall be responsible for preparing and filing all reports and notices required by law, regulation, or the business of CARS.. The Treasurer shall present to the Board the annual budget,. (including projected financial statements and anticipated levels of funding) prior:to October 31 each year. . Under the direction of the Board, the Treasurer shall open bank accounts, negotiate loans and talk fait • • take other such financial actions as may be appropriate to • , conducting.the.business'of CARS. ARTICLE VI OPERATIONS: •• • . I . FISCAL year January 1 through December 31 2... ELECTIONS shall. be held at a regularly scheduled meeting each November. . • 3. ANNUAL BUDGETS shall be prepared and the Board shall approve , such . Budget• at its regularly scheduled November - meeting. . 4. . FUNDING shall consist-:of . .grants, 'gifts contributions and :donations, :5.. . THE.CORPORATION shall. at'all times maintain its status as an organization described. in section 501 (c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code,.as revised from.time to time.. 6. Roberts Rules of Order shall govern all meetings. ARTICLE V.II AMENDMENTS: • The Bylaws' may be amended by a two-thirds (i) vote of the . • Board .of Directors: : Proposed -changes-shall- be submitted in . writing to. the Board.at the previousregularly scheduled board . meeting.or not less than thirty (30) days prior to any vote. . Proxy voting shall be permitted. ARTICLE VIII ADVISORY COUNCIL: 1 . There may be an Advisory Council comprised of designated representatives from sponsoring.groups, former board members, and/or interested individuals...- • . • 2. The Advisory Council shall:meet at least semi-annually, 'chaired . by a designated representative of Board of Directors, to review the activities of CARS, provide advice and technical expertise and support the effective operation of CARS. Written notice of each meeting. will be -.distributed to all Board and Advisory Council members at least twenty-one (21 ) days prior and shall include the time, date, place, and hagenda for said meeting. 3. Board minutes, and agendas shall regularly be distributed to all members of the Advisory Council. ARTICLE IX COMMITTEES: 1 . At the first meeting after a Board is newly elected, the Board shall select from its membership chairpersons for the following Standing Committees: Finance Committee, Media Relations Committee (Publicity), and Volunteer Recruitment Committee. These chairpersons shall serve at the pleasure and direction of the Board. 2. Each Standing Committee shall be chaired by a current Board Member. The chair shall be responsible for recruiting persons to serve on the committee and for calling, publicizing and recording the results of committee meetings. 3. From time to time the Board may appoint or disband Ad Hoc Committees (i.e.: Governmental Relations Committee, Insurance Committee, Legal Committee, Nominating Committee, and/or Training Committee) comprised of representatives from sponsoring groups, current or former Board Members, and/or interested individuals. ARTICLE X DISSOLUTION: An affirmative vote of two-thirds (3) of the Board of Directors is required to dissolve the Corporation. Adopted this a(.1 day of nJ 1999. Na Title: Members of the Board of Directors of Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. Dick Johnston Chairman F. C.LeVrier Vice Chairman Josh Weiser Secretary 1106 Brazos Dr. 1515 Dove 308 Waterford Ct. Southlake TX 76092 Southlake TX 76092 Southlake TX 76092 • Home 421-4227 Bus. Home 329-2447 Bus. 424-4277 Home 251-0671 Bus. • Virginia Muzyka Treasurer Brad Bradley Director Scott Bradley Director 823 S.Peytonville 1256 Main Street Suite 252 1256 Main Street Suite 252 Southlake TX 76092 Southlake TX 76092 Southlake TX 76092 Home 481-6354 Bus. Home * * * * Bus. 488-8048 Home * * * * Bus. 488-8048 Brad Cavnar Director Les Clow Director Barry Emerson Director 1723 E.Southlake Blvd. 820 Shady Oaks 3205 E.Highway 114 Southlake TX 76092 Southlake TX 76092 . Southlake TX'76092 Home* * * * Bus. 251-2226 Home 481-2256 Bus. Home* * * * Bus. 488-5544 Martha Greenberg Director Carolyn Hobbs Director Buddy Luce Director 700 Prince George Ct. 1404 Chimney Works Dr. 1256 Main Street Suite 252 Southlake TX 76092 Southlake TX 76092 Southlake TX 76092 ne 424-0296 Bus. Home 481-6718 Bus. Home* * * * Bus. 488-8048 David McMahan Director Brian Stebbins Director 726 Commerce Suite 109 904 Independence Parkway Southlake TX 76092 Southlake TX 76092 Home 481-8344 Bus. Home 488-2317 Bus. 329-5566 J 12/9/99 jbA13 C�'all�1 Bide of iouthlake Finance Summary INCOME TO DATE Contributions Loan 11/23/1999 $700.00 12/19/2000' $1,000.00 12/21/1999' $25.00 01/04/2000 5,000.00 01/27/2000 $ft0.00 TOTALS $1,875,00 $5,000.00. EXPENSE TO DATE 1 — Supplies/ i Professional Printing Utilities Rent Fees Filing Fees Insurance 1 1/2911 999 $500.00 12/07/1999 $25.00 12/09/1999 $25.00^ _ 12/09/1999 $57.56 12/20/1999 $316.75 12/22/1999 I $682.51 • 01/07/2000 $294.81' 01/13/2000 $306.00 01/19/2000 $15.49 01/26/2000 333.23 01/26/2000 _ $51.43 01/28/2000 $64.12 01/26/2000 $11.79 01/27/2000 $1,025.00 Totals 541.06 2 44.51 $25.00a $500.00 $2,024.26 dep. &rent/ Due March 1 I $2,000.001_ LQlde ("V 41e4755 of Omit/slake 1o4.iy P e nor Cull 12ide of Youthlake Date Approved:ag1 Lade (u7)IsE+7s4 Operations Manual 1"'2°°° of ebothJ@XO TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Rider Eligibility 2 Qualified User 2 Operating Hours 2 Service Area and Services 2 Scheduling 2 Volunteer Drivers 3 Trip Ticket 4 Driver Supervisor/Scheduler 5 Office Volunteer 6 • /oAzf gallGall A L 1'de .of Southlake Date Approved: wide am 416.4755 Operations Manual 1/7/2000 of Cotaidake RIDER ELIGIBILITY 1. Seniors (55years and older), and Disabled(of any age)who are residents of Southlake, or active participants in the Southlake Senior Activities Center programs who reside within the CARS operating area, and whose physical condition permits them to be transported by the drivers and vehicles available. QUALIFIED USER 1. To become a Qualified User the User Application form must be completed: 2. The applicant will be interviewed to confirm that they meet the Eligibility requirements and to determine whether the applicant requires any-special help while being transported. OPERATING HOURS 1. Monday through Friday with pickups after 8 AM and return home before 5 PM. 2. Special Requests for transportation outside these hours will be considered. SERVICE AREA AND SERVICES • 1. Qualified users will be furnished non-emergency rides to the Southlake Senior Activities Center, medical and dental services, shopping, financial services,personal grooming, and social activities. 2. For non-emergency medical and dental services Qualified Users may be transported to locations within a 25 mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activities Center. 3. For other destinations,Qualified Users may be transported to locations within a 7 mile radius of the Southlake Senior Activities Center. SCHEDULING 1. Qualified Users desiring transportation must call the CARS office, 416-9975, between 8 AM and 12 noon on weekdays,at least 24 hours before transportation is needed. For prescheduled appointments or events, several days notice would be helpful. The Qualified Users will provide the following information: name, address for pickup, destination address, pickup time,return time and emergency. contact. .044 i y • a • • u Call£ Bide of cgouthlake Date Approved:Pa3 gods `"p""'" Operations Manual 1"'2°°° • VOLUNTEER DRIVERS 1. Prospective Volunteers will fill out an Volunteer Application Form and be interviewed. 2. Volunteer Drivers will furnish their own vehicles and will be responsible for their maintenance and fuel. Vehicles must have current state inspection seal and insurance. Driver records will be checked. 3. CARS furnishes liability insurance to provide protection for losses greater than the owner's insurance policy coverage. - 4. Volunteer Drivers will be trained in the procedures and policies of CARS. They will be given a CARS pictorial Identification Badge to wear while providing transportation and a CARS mirror hang tag to identify their car while providing transportation. 5. Volunteer Drivers will be contacted on the the day before their scheduled driving day by the Driver Supervisor/Scheduler to receive their assignments)for the next day. The Driver Supervisor/Scheduler and the Volunteer Driver should understand where the Qualified User is to be picked up and the Destination. The Volunteer Driver will pick up Trip Ticket(s)from the box outside,the CARS office on the second floor of 181 Grand Avenue, Suite 209,during the time the building is open,between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on weekdays or 7:00 AM to 2:00 PM on Saturdays. 6. If a Volunteer Driver is unable to drive when scheduled he/she will contact their Driver Supervisor as soon as possible so that a replacement can be secured. , 7. The Volunteer Driver will call the Qualified Users on the evening before the trip to confirm that they will be transported,as well as reconfirming location, destination, times and emergency contact. 8. The driver will fill in the Trip Record section of the Trip Ticket and sign it. (See the Operations Manual section Trip Tickets for detailed instructions.)The completed Trip Ticket will be delivered to the CARS office and placed in the box beside the door if the office is not open. 9. If the transportation to the destination and from the destination are furnished by different Volunteer Drivers,the first driver will give the Qualified User a Transfer Ticket to give to the second driver to provide identification confirming that the bearer is the Qualified User. 10. When taking a Qualified User to a medical appointment the Volunteer Driver should accompany the User into the office and ask the receptionist for an estimate of when the User will be ready to go home. , 11. The Volunteer Drivers will not collect money from the Qualified Users but will provide an addressed envelope which may be used for donations. A �o •-7. r Call Al a3ide of5outhlake Page 4 Date Approved: gime ofe"�"' Operations Manual. 1/7/2000 TRIP TICKET The purpose of the Trip Ticket is provide a record of each transportation service provided by CARS. It records both the User and information about the trip and also service provided by the Volunteer Driver. The Trip Ticket will be used by those receiving transportation requests from Qualified Users to record the Request Received,Trip Ticket Number,User, and Destination information.The Volunteer Driver ' will record the Trip Record, Comments and Driver information. OPERATION 1. When a telephone request is received for transportation the Office Volunteer will first check the Qualified User List to see that the caller is qualified. If qualified, the User and Destination Sections are completed. 2. If the User is to be picked up at a place other than their permanent address, list the pickup address in the Comments Section and note whether the person is to be returned to this tem- porary address or to their permanent address. 3. When all the information has been received,read it back to the User to confirm that it is correct. 4. Add the User Number and the Trip Ticket Number and the Office Volunteer's name in the By space. 5. File the Trip Tickets in the proper day of the Scheduler File. 6. The Driver Supervisor will decide which Volunteer Driver is to provide the requested transportation. The Driver Supervisor will call the Volunteer Driver to confirm that the driver will do the trip and tell him/her where to get the Trip Ticket. The Driver Supervisor • will also confirm that the Volunteer Driver knows how to reach the locations called for in the Trip Ticket. The two of them should agree that the Pickup Time specified is reason- - able. 7. The Driver Supervisor will place his/her name(or an alternate person) and the telephone number,at which they can be reached during the time the trip is being made on the CARS Emergency Contact line. 8. The Volunteer Driver will then call the User to introduce herself/himself,to confirm that transportation will be furnished the next day and to review the Trip Ticket to confirm that the information is correct. 9. On the next day the Volunteer Driver will record on the Trip Ticket the time and odometer reading (last three numbers)when they leave home(or another location)for the User pickup. When the User is picked up record the User Pick Up Time and Odometer reading. Upon arrival at the destination record the Destination Arrival Time and Odometer reading. • gaff P Call ° ll3°t ide Of 0out`I21ake Date Approved: 5 e we (a»' "' 1/7/2000 � 1, Operations Manual TRIP TICKET (continued) 10. If the Volunteer Driver does personal business while the User is at the Destination,the Time and Odometer readings when they stop doing CARS business should be recorded in the upper Arrived Home section and the Time and Odometer readings when they start CARS business to bring the User home in the lower Driver left home section. 11. For the return trip record the Volunteer Driver will record the Left Destination Time and Odometer reading when leaving the destination and the Arrived Home Time and Odometer upon arriving home or an alternate final destination. If the final destination is not the same as originally specified on the Trip Ticket it should be recorded in the Comments section. 12. When the Volunteer Driver arrives home or to another personal destination which ends the CARS trip, record the Arrived Home Time and Odometer reading. • 13. The Trip Ticket is then returned to the CARS office at the Town Center before 12:30 PM of the day after the trip is made.. DRIVER SUPERVISOR/SCHEDULER 1. The Driver Supervisor/Scheduler will work in CARS office from 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM. 2. Preparation of Volunteer Driver Assignments. a. Remove the Trip Tickets for the following day from the Schedule File. Review the ride requests and determine how many Volunteer Drivers will be needed to provide the requested rides. b. If one Volunteer Driver can provide a ride for more than one User, copy the informa- tion for the second ride on the lower half of the Trip Ticket for the first ride. c. Using the Volunteer Driver Schedule assign driver to each trip. d. Call Volunteer Driver to confirm that she/he is available to drive and remind him/her to pick up their Trip Tickets from the holder outside the office door during the time the building is'open,between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on weekdays or 7:00 AM to 2:00 PM on Saturdays. e. Place the Volunteer Driver's name in the Driver section of each Trip Ticket. Place the Driver Supervisor/Scheduler's name and phone number at the bottom of the Trip Ticket in the CARS Emergency Contact section. The Volunteer Supervisor/Scheduler should be reachable through the phone number provided during the period when trans- portation is being carried out,to provide assistance if needed. f. Make a copy of the Trip Tickets which will be used the next day and place them in the 1044.2? • adz gall Al aide of 5outhlake Page 6 Date Approved: of Stime�omrowowns Operations Manual 1/7/2000 Active Trip Ticket File. g. Place the originals of the Trip Tickets in the box outside the CARS office for the Vol- , unteer Driver to pick up. h. If a driver has a problem which prevents him/her from completing the trip,he/she will call the Emergency Contact who will call a Backup Driver to complete the trip. • 3. Work with other Driver Supervisor/Schedulers to keep the Volunteer Driver Schedule up to date as to who the Volunteer Drivers and Backup Drivers are for each day. OFFICE VOLUNTEER 1. Office hours will be from 9:00 AM to 12:30 PM. 2. Calls from Qualified Users requesting ride reservations. a. First confirm that the person is a Qualified Userby looking them up on the Qualified User List. If the person is not a Qualified User treat them as a Prospective User as de- scribed in 3 below b. If the person is a Qualified User enter their name and number on a Trip Ticket. Con- firm that their address has not changed. c. Fill in the Destination information. Make sure you understand where the Destination is. d. After you hang up fill in the User's address,phone number and Emergency Contact and Phone number from the Qualified User List. e. Then fill in the Request Received information. f. Record the call in the Log Book. - g. Place the Trip Ticket in the proper day of the Scheduler File. 3. Calls from prospective users. a. Write the person's Name,Address, phone number and age on a User Registration Form. b. Tell the person that an Interviewer will call for and appointment and then talk with the person to collect the other information needed to determine whether they qualify as a CARS User. c. Record the call in the Log Book. d. Place the User Registration Form in the Interviewer File. 4. Calls for information. a. Answer questions emphasizing the benefits of the CARS program. b. If they want more information offer to send the CARS information sheet. Write their name,address and phone number in the Log Book. -I irn e 7 Elide of c 5outhlake Date Appraged: �' iele "6"'3 1/7/2000 Operations Manual c. Then address a Cars Information Sheet envelope and put in the Outgoing Mail box. 5. Match completed Trip Tickets with copies in the Active Trip Ticket Folder and place them in the Completed Trip Folder. 6. Those who are willing to take the necessary training may enter information from com- pleted Trip Tickets,User Registration Forms,Volunteer Application Forms, etc., into the computer. 7. File all forms after the information on them has been recorded in the computer. 8. Prepare mailings. 9. Make copies as needed. Gall £ Mide of 0outhlake - TRIP TICKET 181 Grand Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092,(817)416-9755 "tequest Received: Date Time By Trip Ticket Number Jser: Name Number_ Street Phone Emergency Contact: Phone: Mapsco Destination: Appointment Date: Day of Week: Time Place Street City Pickup Time Return Time Mapsco Trip Record: User Pick Up: Time Odometer - Arrived Destination: Time Odometer Left Destination: Time Odometer Arrived Home: Time Odometer Comments: Driver Name: Driver Signature: Number Driver left home: Time Odometer Arrived home:Time Odometer Driver left home: Time Odometer Arrived home:Time Odometer Gall£ Elide of&outhlake - TRIP TICKET 181 Grand Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092,(817)416-9755 Request Received: Date Time By Trip Ticket Number User: Name Number Street Phone Emergency Contact: Phone: Mapsco Destination: Appointment Date: Day of Week: Time Place Street City Pickup Time Return Time Mapsco Trip Record: User Pick Up: Time Odometer Arrived Destination: Time Odometer Left Destination: Time Odometer Arrived Home: Time Odometer Comments: Driver Name: Driver Signature: Number iver left home: Time Odometer Arrived home:Time Odometer Driver left home: Time Odometer Arrived home:Time Odometer CARS Emergency Contact: Phone (iil1/200016:-S2p Volunteer Driver Assignments Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Morning Shanan Wood Shanan Wood Josh Weiser Bennie Underwood Bennie Underwood- Bennie Underwood Bennie Underwood Bennie Underwood James Gathings James Gathings Dick Johnston Dick Johnston Dick Johnston Sonja Allen Sonja Allen Les Clow Les Clow Les Clow Les Clow Les Clow Martha Greenberg NEED Afternoon Josh Weiser Josh Weiser •►; Dick Johnston Dick Johnston Dick Johnston Dick Johnston s Shanan Wood* James Gathings James Gathings Bennie Underwood Bennie Underwood Les Clow Les Clow Les Clow Les Clow Les Clow Jonathan Greenberg NEED NEED NEED 1111100 *Before 3 PM Note: Les Clow has temporary double duty on this list. Volunteer Driver - Backup • CARS 'Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc. REGISTRATION FORM All participants in CARS must complete a registration form inc uding all the requested information prior to being eligible for service. The confidentiality of provided information will be respected. All registration forms must be • signed by the participant or a duly authorized representative. PERSONAL INFO EtMATION DATE City.rf Residence • Phone. Number Last Name First Name. lniW 1 Street.Address Apt. No. City Zip Code MAPSCO . Sex Height Weight. Date of Birth • Please list below any health issues that may affect your ridership under this program. Emergency Contact. Phone Number • Primary Care Physician: Phone Number Name Address Do you Speak English Yes 'No Are you Disabled Yes No Describe: I.)o you need to use any of the following: wily;EI.CIIAIR Yes No CANE Yes No WALKER - Yes No CRUTC1-1ES Yes No • SCOOTER Yes No I)O(1 Yes No • OXY(1EN EQ)UIPMENI' Yes No • If you use a Wheelchair, can you transfer yourself into a passenger car? Yes No into a van or pickup? Yes No Emergency Treatment Release and Liability Waiver: I certify that I have truthfully provided all requested information and that I understand the dangers inherent in my participation in the services provide by Call A Ride of Southlake, Inc., "CARS". I hereby authorize CARS to validate any information that I have provided, and to seek and obtain emergency medical treatment on my behalf, including transportation to the nearest medical facility in the event that CARS deems it necessary. I hereby relieve CARS, its employees, volunteers, agents, instructors and sponsors of all liability that may occur due to my participation in any CARS activity. I further certify that I am medically sound enough to participate in the CARS program,that I have read and understood this form and that all entries and information contained herein are true and complete. Print Name: (Applicant) Signed Date Print Name: (CARS Interviewer) Signed Date • • Form!wooded 11132199 J •51.11/ Call A LVide of`outhlake — TRIP TICKET Day 181 Grand Avenue, Southlake,Texas 76092 (817)416-9755 Driver Trip Ticket Number Request Received: Date Time - By USER: ID No. - Name Telephone Address _. City • Subdivision Emergency Contact Telephone Destination: Day of Week Date Time Place City Address Pickup Time Return Time Comments/Directions: Driver Info: Miles Traveled Time Committed Driver Signature ID No. CARS Emergency Contact Telephone 1/2 5/2000 • 10443c - . Call A Ride of Southlake - User List Last Name First Name Address city Mapsc .Phone Emergency Contact •Emerg Phone Comments ID Alexander Jeanne 1204 W.Southl Southlake (817)481-383 Terry Plemons -817 481-7696 1 Anderson Maedelle 2013 Heatherbr Grapevine (817)421-639 Dr Stephen Anderson 817 488-4142 Slow walking;uses cane 2 sometimes. Bandy Faye 5620 Fannin St Watauga (817)281-406 Deborah Gibson (817)465-7802 9,. Bickerstaff Beverly 710 Langford D Southlake (817)329-144 Beverly Heam (817)306-8148 10 Bickerstaff Clyde 710 Langford D Southlake (817)329-144 Beverly Hearn (817)306-8148 11 - ' Byrd Kathryn 1306 Concord Southlake (817)481-627 Beverly Davidson (817)481-6273 Cane;Vision Impaired;Go to 12 't ,, driveway gate-side doo ICate Mabel 2050 E.Dove R Southlake (817)488-808 Linde Carter . (817)488-5180 13 IliAg._ Douglas Silvia 805 Potomac PI Southlake (817)424-318 Ingrid Ford 817 424-3184 3 rit Swans Lois 2708 Miles City Southlake (817)251-171 Patty Fleming 817 251-1819 4 • Greene Ouida 1302 Normandy Southlake (817)421-664 Deborah Viebrock (817)488-5180 Cane sometimes 14 Greenough Frieda 2911 Peninsula Grapevine (817)488-754 Betsy Grouly 817 488-7544 5 .Hanson Vi • 802 Potomac Southlake (817)729-881 Lorelei Almand 807 329-8812. Parkinsons 6 . ' Herron Lenora 500 S.White C Southlake (817)488-895 Theresa Gentry 972 445-5374 7• • . .:-........ .... ,._-,.. .,, 3, .....: ., r, a-.., ,s.................<.,.w._.«.,... a,.,......M,,........,....,..,a.1..,'v.,-.,..-,.....o., 5,...........£.....:. ._..., , WeUnesdat..January 26: 206 Page I of 3 Last Name First Name Address City Marc Phone Emergency Contact Emerg Phone Comments ID Hoger Mary 702 Nelson Ct Southlake (817)424521 Sherry Nevens 817 424-5212 Cane 8 Johnston Richard 1106 Brazos Dr Southlake (817)421-422 Matlyn Johnston (817)421-4227 16 Johnston Matlyn 1106 Brazos Dr Southlake (817)421-422 Dick Johnston (817)421-4227 15 Jones Pat 1405 Mary Ct Roanoke (817)431-046 Geo Fisher (817)379-0564 17 Land Clarissa 2900 Burney Ln Southlake (817)424-351 Ken Land (817)481-4267 18 Mailman Ann 105 Meadowlar Southlake (817)421-995 Rodney Wood (214)312-3631 Total laryngectomy-does not 19 • - speak O'Connor Jean 1400 Park Blvd, Grapevine (817)421-632 Lynn Lindblad (817)488-3356 20 NO;'erry Frances 1903 Haymead Southlake .(817)251-882 Jackie Atwell (817)488-3355 21 NO 4 Purvinis Marie 1795 Kingswoo Southlake (817)337-020 Mary Purvinis-Hart (817)488-3355 22 4' Rentfro Kathleen 2735 N White Southlake (817)488-402 Bonnie Hays (817)481-4713 Cane sometimes 23 6andlin Emana 1590 N Gravel Southlake (817)424-510 Sheila Mullens (817)481-2137 24 Shuping Estelle 1310 N Shady Southlake (817)481-125 Lesle Shuping (972)723-2666 Cane;Walker 26 • Simmons Mary 2752 Warwick Grapevine (817)481-684 Tom Simmons (817)795.4830 27 Sir ith Kathleen - 4712 Manning Colleyville (817)269-942 Mark Smith (817)267-9465 25 ,.n ..... ..,,- .,.,., ......, .: -- , '.s ,. -..n.,.,.. z^,.r_..s....�•.rt_:r.x' r> .., .._ .._r z..s. ..,,..:x:...s.,....x.. ..,._.....__...3._._s.ai.rar.x... .S .... ,•, .....i .,..:..: .. -,. ._,..._.......«.-. ......,s..o_•c:.'ry:mS�:_..��.,','x_:`A'_:...::Se,...'.^.!.u.�........ n'":'f.''.,:. w....... , ... ":%t.x .. _ 'fc..n�' Wednesday, January 26-, 20i10 Page 2 of 3 Last Name First Name Address City Ma sc Phone - Emergency Contact Emerg Phone Comments ID Spera Charline 207 Travis St Roanoke (817)491-435 Gayle Wall • (817)430-2372 28 • 4111141/4440 •S!,k 4no silk• • • • Iilednesday, January 26 2000 Page 3 43 • ,,,,-1 ,, g:5 4 r'.),,' ,,,,.: „ f't 'r 9 .:4 !,'-'," ,;'47 Z,.,,,,.. ,1',1 Efr ':: .:,A*,,,,1 e,z:f.,: ,:,•:,11)T,/-X,: ,_ ,i. 0 PC-,0 31 5,.,-,;:;113. ,n• .:,..., 4i,,:7.,,,,, ..t Jit. _ii'4-r'S t",?::::,• '‘i.0 e kj'ta'6",g-k.6'ir-.,:.1 '::;:l:.''t•&.. " .:,1'..-,'e e. ;..-,.:,.. .g.,,..z,.::::2. . . sl,;, ..:, i 4.,• f , , •T 1, ;, -f.,",i r"...11!6'n e Sox .,. Phim: .,-:.W.:..^ , (,-..f P c Y r..L•el:...e;;I'L; 7 .Allen . Sonja 283-7979 Cell 817 798-3305 208 S.Sheppard Dr. Euless No 20 Atwell Jackie 251-8820 Cell 817-691-8820 1903 Haymedow Ct. Southlake No 15 Baldwin Cindy 481-5572 1114 Travis Ct. Southlake No 19 Clow . Virginia 481-2256 820 Shady Oaks Dr. Southlake .., No .••., • 4 Clow Les 481-2256 820 Shady Oaks Dr. Southlake No 6 Gathings James 690-7582 2141 Winding Creek Dr. Grapevine No 13 Giffin Jackie 329-3964 1020 Highland Oaks Dr. Southlake No 11 Greenberg Martha . 424-0296 Cell 972 679-13029 700 Prince George Ct. 1Southlake _ No 11/0444to .a. , v,z • 18 Greenberg Jonathan 424-0296 700 Prince George Ct. Southlake No • s 16 Griffin Nancy 481-5140 1373 Woodbrook Southlake No 8 Hampshire Rose 416-0866 201 E.Chapel Downs Dr. Southlake No ItifS) 9 Hampshire Mike . 416-0866 201 E.Chapel Downs Dr. Southlake No 1 Johnston Dick 421r4227. 1106 Brazos Dr. Southlake No 3 Johnston Matalyn 421-4227 , 1106 Brazos Dr. Southlake No 12 Muzyka Virginia 481-6354 823 S.Peytonvitle Ave. Southlake No 14 Premer Sandy 421-3523 410 Highland Oaks Cir. Southlake No 5 Underwood Bennie • 481-7787 1351 Lakeview Dr. .Southlake No 2 Weiser Josh 251-0671 308 Waterford Ct. • Southlake No 10 Wood Hsiang-Lan ,421-8693 ' ' 1205 Timber Ct. Southlake No .- : • , . :i'i:,'''fi::.•.-;1.1q,...„1:01,;,,t.,,p, •_,,-,.. ,-,!p:,!? l'e:,,...1,:: I rf.4-1 .s. . . City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Garland Wilson,Director of Public Safety(Ext. 730) SUBJECT: Request for a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A for The Roomstore Furniture, located at 1600 East Southlake Boulevard. Action Requested: City Council consideration of a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A for The Roomstore Furniture, adding a monument sign. Background Information: This store was granted a building permit on August 12, 1998 and which was completed on March 12, 1999. On September 4, 1998 two sign permits were issued under Sign Ordinance 506-A for the existing attached sign on the front of the building and for a monument sign that was never built. Prior to building the monument sign, the owner appeared before the City Council and requested to build a second attached sign on the East face of the building instead of the monument sign because he thought it was more visible. The variance was granted for the second sign now existing on the building on January 5, 1999. • After operating the business for approximately one year the manager, Mr. Sidney Gardner, has now requested to erect a monument sign approximately at the original approved location. The proposed sign would comply with the present ordinance in terms of size and construction. This case is brought before the City Council even though the sign fully complies with the present Sign Ordinance because of the stipulation on the original variance. Mr. Sidney Gardner will be present at the City Council meeting to address any questions that may arise. Financial Considerations: . Not Applicable - Citizen Input/ ' Board Review: No citizen input has been received. Not subject to any Board review. Legal Review: None Alternatives: The council may approve the request, deny the request or approve it subject to whatever conditions they deem appropriate. 10B-1 Billy Campbell March 31, 2000 Page 2 Supporting Documents: Variance Application Form Sign Drawings Ordinance No.704-A, Sections 14 and 16-B Minutes of January 5, 1999 City Council Meeting, Item 10-B Staff Recommendation: Place the request for a variance to Sign Ordinance 704-A for The Roomstore Furniture to add a monument sign, on the April 4, 2000 City Council meeting agenda for approval. GW/bls r - 10B-2 /�y� _-, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE February 6, 1995 `��"� wm SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION /Mi Et FEB 282000 OWNER (if different) de APPLICANT NAME: S1�N �R R ONE / /4 I� -/�'!EV6 RS N no 0. So p/� ADDRESS: /[/0u1N2A/r� &i'z /as-'6o /i) -Sf CREE/r RRR/r-wfx/. S ltHx.)10' l!. %o lZ lcK/noNts 1/A 49-.313S PHONE: 8/,; Jo +101/0 FAX: S/rl 30213S146' The following information pertains to the location for which the_ variance is being requested: NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: DDA'j 5iLOR ' PHYSICAL ADDRESS: /6090 SoufHLAKE al-1). LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot / Block Subdivision V/LL /r E I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a representative at the City Co cil meeting who is authorized to discuss this request, address any unresolved issu and ap e changes, if any. Aplicant's Signature: Date:_a /O tO ********************** * ******* ************* **************** r*******tit************** For City Use Only: - I hereby acknowledge receipt of the sign variance application and the appliction fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 199 . Signed: - Title: ****************************************************************************************** The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the• Sign Ordinance No. 506 and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached.) . Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking it approaches and adjoining street R.O.W. • Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for wh I 1 requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall s he building, th- sign for which the variance is requested, and any oth ' g4kBhes rip or are exempt from the sign ordinance. ���wvu� 10B-3 • Demonstration please demwstrate that the follo.wina conditions are applicable to the , ::quested sign variance: 1. That a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant. WE" //AVE C a57'0/MER'S *A+ SRy f NEy DRIVE' By OuR StoR E EUERyOAy /9/1/00 ,0/,o Not RE-Az /z E A Home , /S/?/NG' S-f aRE GaAs /1 f This Z oCAfi0/11, 2' h//Iik /7` is Not Co/! /!/E fo C o/►?fANy GROW t/ AND DevEzO19/7E,Nf AJ/tH oGC.t g fil°NI(fiiEN-1 S/a/V/ Oaf FRoNf-. - 2. That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the -affected property and is not self imposed., Z .Z/NK DUE 77o fWE Filet OUR SORE Sits SAC k 1311.,ow SfREtf ZE(/ECG 4ND Gt/i//-N 7L69 vE4/it/6 Sot t kh A f/E' QL VD 7/HE /CC CE FREES a P FRoNf DN ,BO*H ./,DES QL OCk 711,E S1°RE, 3 . That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties. 1144 of 7HE eu sin)Ess ESTAsi/$WMPNrs ARounJD as NtquE M ONuMEtJiL s/GNS. ', , 4. That the variance will be in 'harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. . Z f,//NA' OuR S/ N WILL. FIt _TAJ l,J I-tH OaR /UC/Gli,QoRs . ' roo .si,. .i, !nl t,t FEB 28 2000 10B-4 00 ,14 It'.4.trtie ----'----" " . 12.1'4 ...--.----''-"----------'"---"-"--Vitlitil f:===:) lir _ , - . 76' . , '�' THE —r d G 0 u,eid . !Li' ----------1 . _ . 14co' Wm,.Mee-mff Raw &OR, eo� ir e fe1Ron PAAE _0i(frotereD &Yea. rAtE0-gra,..cit e, 70 MA ref, OrssrleYo. Sum'is/WOr 9-q0I Z.C1---v\ • 7z=. (T1 WiE@TIMEI la FEB 2 8 2000 ••••••Rrlree........ • City of Southlake, Texas SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS March 15, 2000 SIGN ORDINANCE NO. 704-A The following is excerpted from the Sign Ordinance: SEC. 14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. SEC. 16 . PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS B MONUMENT SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all monument signs which are allowed under this ordinance. 2. MINIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six(6) inches. 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Four(4) feet, excluding monument base and sign structure. The monument base may be an additional eighteen(18)inches in height measured from ground level at the center of the base to the top of the base. The sign structure shall not exceed five (5)feet. 4. MAXIMUM AREA: One hundred(100)square feet per sign with a maximum area per sign face of fifty (50) square feet. The maximum area for the sign structure shall not exceed seventy(70)square feet (see Appendix'A'for measurement criteria). 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only, one monument sign, excluding menuboard signs, shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site,unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. Monument signs may be no closer than five hundred(500)feet on any one site. 6. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from any property line. 7. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: All monument sign bases shall be constructed of the same 10B-7 masonry material as the front building facade on the same site or shall be stone or brick. The sign structure must be constructed or covered with the same masonry material as the principal building, or stone, or brick. Sculpted aluminum sign panels will be allowed. All sign text and graphic elements shall be limited to a minimum of six(6)inches from the outer limits of the sign structure. 8. ILLUMINATION: Monument signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting for sculpted aluminum panels or a ground lighting source where the light itself and supporting structure are not visible from public R.O.W. The following sign would comply with the code. . Sign Area = 12.5 x 4 = 50 square feet Structure Area (excluding base) ' Is" I 12'-s" 19" I 5 x 14 = 70 square feet 6" ADDRESS NOS.ONLY Sign Height = 4 feet 4'-0" SIGN PANEL Structure Height (excluding base) = 5 ft. MINIMUM 6"LETTER HEIGHT 6" MASONRY STRUCTURE Overall Height = 6.5 feet 1'- 6" MASONRY BASE Notes: Address numbers posted on i FOOTING AS NEEDED structure not considered as part of sign area. L:\BUILDING\CHUCK\S ignSupport.doc 10B-8 P.02 I— 9-B. Resolution No.99-02,Appointing two members of the munity-at large to the Jodnt Drug and Alcohol Awareness Committee 10-A. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with The Beck Company for construction management services in conjunction with Soutftlalx Town Hall.(To table) 10-B. Sign variance appeal far an additional attached sign for The Rooms at 1600 East Southlake Boulevard. Motion was made to approve the conned agenda as follows: 05-A,as amended,through #5-J;#S-C;#8-D,subject to staff review summary dated December 12, 1998 per the P&Z recommendation and clarified in comment #1 in the staff review letter, #8-E; #8-F, pursuant to staff review letter dated December 11. 1998: and #8-G, peanut to staff review letter dated December 31, 1998; hem #9-B, per diseusaion dig exocutive session, naming rackie Lawrence and Brad Bartholomew; Itemm #10-A, tabling; and approving[team#10-B,allowing the maximum of 75 s4$.of new siguase to replace the rao nImeet sign on the northeast comer of the building . Motion: Martin Second: Fawns Ayes: Media,Fawns,Kendall,Moffat,tdroondson,Evans,Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Caaneiboember Edmondson abstained an Agenda Item NS-A, Ceuadlnremmber Martin abstained on Agenda Items#8-C and 011.D. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 5-A. Approval piths thus Minutes of the Regular and 4recia1 City Cowell meetings held on December 15. 1998. The minutes were approved, amending the totes of thee December 15,1998 regular City Council meding. 5-B. Ordinance No. 727, 1" reading .Revising Sottthlal4s City Code, Chapter 11. Article Ilr. Section 12 97 through I2 99, reswatng number of members of Youth Park and Recreation Board,and inn o,orating revitiveer cf Ordirnaneer No. 646-A. This item is being brought inward to make the change requested by the Youth Paris and Recreation Board regarding the number of its members. It is their dear to increase the masher to nine members from the cumin nit seven,in order to ensue hotter continuity from one school year)o the next,and to reflect the memo number of members as on the Park and Recreation Board. 5-C. Authorize city staff to reject bids for construction of a sanitary stager lift station to serve the Rahrtree/Skady Dare arcs and authorization to advertise for bids for the construction°fa sanitary sewer 10 station at Loneaon a Dow and a list station to r' sere the RainrrerlShady Lane area. Staff is requesting the City Council to reject Regular.City Conked Meesdng Minutes of January 5,1999,Page 6 of 22 10B-9 Mar-15-00 09: 17A P.03 `r. addition to the City of Southlake, Twat Coudty,Teus, according to the plat recOrtded in Cabinet A, Slide 2554, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.3769 saes. Current zoning is "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Owner and Applicant: The Takes of La Palama. Approved pursuant to staff review letter'dated Deatenbes 31, 1998. 9-B. Rc!olutton No. 99-02,Appointing two members of the t Large to the Joint Drug and Alcohol Anureness Comnetttee solution No. 99-02 was approved, per discussion in the executive session,naming Jackie Lawrence and Brad Bartholomew to the committee. 10-A. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with The Beck Company for cons ion numegernent services in conjunction with Sowthlakr TOWN Nall This item was tabled. 10-B. Riga variance for an additional attached sign for The Roomstore at 1600 East SoWI,lakr Boulevard, Approving this variance allowing the maximum of 75 sq.ft. of new signage to replace the monument sign on the northeast corner of the building. Agenda Item#6,Public Form No comments were made daring the public forum. Agenda Item in-A,ZA 98-134,Site Pint for F.elcerd's Site ZA 98-134, Site Plan for Tom Thumb Center and Ecke,d's being a Site Plan for Tom Thumb Center on property legally daonbcd as Lot 3, and a portion of Late 2 and 4, L.B.O. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of SouttrWue, Tarnmt County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216, Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texaa and a 1.174 acre portion of Tract 1C2 situated in the L.B.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and a Site Plan for Bckerd's on property legally deacxtbed as Lola S and 6, Block 6, Diamond Circle Estates,an addition to the City of Southlals e, Tarrant County,Tama,according to the plat recorded in Volume 3B8-181,Page 69,Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 9.386 total acres. The aspplieaat hers smeuded the request to only Include the Beterd's portion. Current zoning is"CS" Community Service Distact, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, and "S-P-2" Generalized City Plan District with "C-3" Gemmel Commercial District uses excluding certain uea. Applicants: Bury&Pittman-DFW,inc.(Tom Thumb Ceuta)and Michael F.Two,Inc. (Iickerd's site). Owners: EPIFD-Oosaroade Sq as L.P. (Tom Thumb Center)and EPIPD-Soouthlake No. I,L.P.(Eckcr+d's site). Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, stated thirteen (13) notices were sent to property owners within the 200' notification arm and one (1)response was received within the 200' notification area: Robert Harvey, Jr. 9012iaeeslald Basdevand Soathlate, apposed. On December 1, 1998,the City Council approved the request of the applicant to table and Regular City Council Meetieg Mantes of January 5,1999,Page 10 of 22 10B-10 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Interim Planning Director (ext. 743) _ SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a reciprocal parking agreement with EPIPD.— Crossroads Square, L.P. (Tom Thumb) Action Requested: City Council consideration of a Reciprocal Parking Agreement with EPIPD — Crossroads Square, L.P. (Tom Thumb). This agreement provides the following: • EPIPD may construct (in grasscrete) 13 head-in and 5 parallel parking spaces on Bicentennial Park property adjacent to the tennis courts and west of Crossroads Square Shopping Center; • EPIPD may construct (in grasscrete) 8 head-in parking spaces North of Tom Thumb's building on city-owned property; • City shall have unlimited use of the above-noted parking spaces plus an additional 26 parking spaces located north of the western off-site parking areas (in close proximity of ballfields #4, #5, and #10 which are utilized by children 10 and younger); • City shall bear no responsibility or liability for damages to the parking areas by any member of the public nor bear the cost of any construction, maintenance and operation in connection with the parking areas. EPIPD shall bear the cost of relocating and/or installing existing or future utilities affected by use and occupancy of the parking areas; • Said agreement shall terminate the earlier of EPIPD's abandonment of the parking area or July 1, 2040 and cannot be assigned without prior written consent of the City. • EPIPD shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City and its agents against all claims or suits for property damage or loss and/or personal injury and shall maintain public liability insurance in the amount of $100,000 per occurrence for property damage and $500,000 per occurrence for personal injury or death. Background Information: In the work session held prior to the February 2 City Council meeting, the developer agreed to relocate some parking spaces from adjacent to the tennis courts to north of the Tom Thumb, and make five (5) spaces parallel parking IDCr l Billy Campbell, City Manager March 31, 2000 Page 2 instead. These spaces were adjacent to the easternmost tennis court, and staff had concerns that the head-in parking spaces were too close to the courts. (Refer to transcript of work session, page 9, lines 30 - 31 and page 10, lines 1 - 24 shown in bold). In regular session, parking was discussed with regard to the relocation arrangement previously discussed during the work session. Staff review summary letter #3, item 4(b) addressed the off-site parking and need for reciprocal parking agreement. (See attached site plan review summary #3). The City Council approved a variance to the parking requirements (from 514 to 350) as requested by the applicant. In an amendment to the approval motion, the Council also acknowledged "the applicant's , agreement to relocate 8 parking spaces from adjacent to the tennis courts as indicated this evening to northwest quadrant of the site and accept(ed) the commitment to come up with an agreement with staff for some partial use of our property," (Refer to transcript of Case ZA98-156 from 2/2/99 City Council meeting, page 12, lines 16 - 20 shown in bold). Financial Considerations: None. Citizen Input/ Board Review: The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to deny (4-2) the rezoning and site plan for the Crossroads Square retail center at their January 7, 1999 meeting. Commissioners Creighton, Peebles, LeVrier, and Shankland voted to withhold a recommendation to the City Council to approve the rezoning and site plan, citing concerns over the increased parking requirements for the Tom Thumb addition, and the inability of the proposed development to meet the current impervious coverage requirements. The City Council approved (7-0) the first reading of the rezoning and site plan for the Crossroads Square retail center at their January 19, 1999 meeting, allowing grasscrete construction in parking spaces along the entire west property line. The City Council approved (6-0) the second reading of the rezoning and site plan for the Crossroads Square retail center at their February 2, 1999 meeting, allowing for relocation of eight (8) parking spaces from adjacent to the tennis courts to the northwest quadrant of the site and committing to work with staff on an agreement for some partial use of our ("city") property. Legal Review: The City Attorney's office drafted the proposed reciprocal parking agreement. The enclosed agreement has been forwarded to EPIPD for their review. Alternatives: Not Applicable. rM Billy Campbell, City Manager March 31, 2000 Page 3 Supporting Documents: Supporting documents include the following items: • Reciprocal Parking Agreement with EPIPD - Crossroads Square, L.P. • GIS map showing off-site / onsite parking areas affected by this agreement ■ Site Plan and Review Summary #3 for case ZA98-156, dated 02/02/99 • Transcription of Southlake City Council work session, February 2, 1999 ■ Transcription of Case ZA98-156, City Council meeting February 2, 1999 Staff Recommendation: Place this item on the April 4, 2000 City Council agenda for consideration of the Reciprocal Parking Agreement with EPIPD - Crossroads Square, L.P. (Tom Thumb). KPG oc-3 03/31/00 16:07 1T817 569 4491 TCMHMRS_ _ _ i�j002 PARKING AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This Parking Agreement(the"Agreement') is made and entered into by the City of Southlake, a home rule municipal corporation in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the"City and EPIPD-Crossroads Square, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as "EPIPD" WHEREAS, City currently owns a certain tract of land situated in Tarrant County, Texas, being more particularly described on Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes (the "Southlake Property"), and which is located adjacent to a certain tract of land owned by EPIPD, being more particularly described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes (the"EPIPD Property"); WHEREAS,EPIPD is developing a retail shopping center and subleasing the center to Torn Thumb; and WHEREAS, Southiake desires to grant EPIPD permission to construct and use parking areas, as hereinafter set forth, on, over and across portions of the Southiake Property, located adjacent to the west and north property tines of the EPIPD Property, as depicted on Exhibit"B". NOW,THEREFORE,for and in consideration of the premises hereinabove set forth, and the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter contained,the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. City hereby grants to EPIPD permission to construct five(5)parallel parking spaces and thirteen (13) head-in parking spaces on the west property line of the EPIPD property(the"West Parking Spaces") and eight(8) head-in parking spaces on the north property line of the EPIPD property,together with all necessary appurtenances thereto(the "Parking Areas"), described and depicted.on Exhibit"B". The parking spaces are located in, upon, and across that certain tract or parcel of land described and depicted on Exhibit "A". EPIPD shall have the right and privilege to enter upon said Parking Areas as is ` necessary for the proper uses granted herein and for the purpose of constructing and maintaining the Parking Areas, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. 2. City shall have unlimited use of the Parking Areas at all times in conjunction with the use of Bicentennial Park. In addition, City shall have unlimited use of additional twenty-six(26)head-in parking spaces north of the West Parking Spaces, as depicted on Exhibit"B". City shall bear no responsibility or liability for damage caused to th Parking Areas by any member of the public. 3, EPIPD agrees to construct all parking spaces with grass crete. All construction,maintenance and operation in connection with use of the Parking Areas,and occupancy shall be performed in strict compliance with the Charter,Ordinances and Codes of City and in accordance with the directions of the Director of Public Works of City, or his duly authorized representative. All plans and specifications therefor shall be subject to the LOC R1003 TCMHMRS 03/31/00 16:07 $817 569 4491 ^__ lir prior written approval of the Director of Public Works, or his duly authorized representative, but such approval shall not relieve EPIPD of responsibility and liability for concept, design and computation in the preparation of such plans and specifications. 4. EPIPD, at no expense to City, shall make proper provision for the relocation andtor installation of any existing or future utilities affected by the use and occupancy of the Parking Areas, including the securing of approval and Consent from the utility companies and the appropriate agencies of the State and its political subdivisions. In the event any installation, reinstallation, relocation or repair of any existing or future utility or improvements owned or constructed by or on behalf of the public or at public expense is made more costly by virtue of the construction, maintenance or existence of the Parking Areas, EPIPD shall pay to City an additional amount equal to such additional cost as determined by the Director of Public Works, or his duly authorized representative. 5. This Agreement shall be terminated upon the earlier of (i) EPIPD's abandonment of the Parking Areas or(ii)July 1,2040. This Agreement shall continue only so long as EP1PD shall use the Parking Areas for the purposes herein described, and this Agreement shall immediately lapse and terminate upon cessation of use or EPIPD's default is the performance of any of the terms and conditions herein. Upon termination, all rights granted herein to EPIPD shall end. Upon City's request, EPIPD, at its own expense,shall remove the Parking Areas at the termination of this Agreement,and restore the area to a condition acceptable to City, and in accordance with then existing City specifications. 6. EPIPD shall not assign this Agreement, without the prior written consent of City, such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. T. It is specifically understood and agreed that City shall in no way be responsible for any damage which may occur to EPIPD's Parking Areas, and EPIPD hereby releases City from any and all liability and responsible for same. EPIPD COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY,AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY,HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS. OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS ANDiOR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS,OF WHATSOEVER KIND AND CHARACTER,WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED,ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WiTH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF THE PARKING AREAS AND USES GRANTED HEREUNDER, WHETHER OR NOT CAUSED, IN "WHOLE OR IN PART, BY THE ALLEGED NEGLIGENCE OF OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES OR INVITEES OF CITY; AND EPIPD HEREBY ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH CLAIMS OR SUITS. EPIPD SHALL LIKEWISE ASSUME AU..UABiLITY AND RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL INDEMNIFY CITY FOR ANY AND ALL INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WiTH ANY AND ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF EPIPD, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS,SUBCONTRACTORS,LICENSEES,INVITEES,OR TRESPASSERS. 8. EPIPD agrees,binds and obligates itself to maintain public liability insurance covering ail public risks related to the proposed use and occupancy of public property as • IDG5 p_1004 03/31/00 16:08 $817 569 4491 WHIMS __ located and described in Exhibit"B". The amounts of such insurance shall be not less than the following: Property damage, per occurrence $100,000 Personal injury or death, per occurrence $500,000 with the understanding of and agreement by EPIPD that such insurance amounts shall be revised upward at City's option and that EPIPD covenants and agrees to se revise such amounts within thirty (30) days following notice to EPIPD of such requirement. Such insurance policy shall provide that it cannot be canceled or amended without at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to City. 9, EPIPD covenants and agrees to maintain the Parking Areas described on Exhibit"B" in a neat, safe and good condition at all times. 10. In addition to the other grounds for termination provided for in this Agreement,this Agreement may be terminated by City should EPIPD breach any terms or conditions set forth in this Agreement. 11. EPIPD agrees that should any action, at law or in equity, arise out of the terms of this Agreement or on account of EPtPD's maintaining or using the Parking Areas described herein, venue for said action shall be in Tarrant County, Texas. EXECUTED this day of , 2000. GRANTOR: GRANTEE: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE EPIPD-CROSSROADS SQUARE, L.P. By: . . By; . , Title: Title: ATTEST: ATTEST: City Secretary Notary Public • `DC Prr EXHIBIT A � 7 , , LOVE HENRY u� 7_, R 1 P i CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ,,,, gmIIII EPIPD PROPERTY , , _____ ii. _ „r_ ilkompas OUTHLAKE -PA , , \ / S ►oc-1 TomTom Thumb EXHIBIT "B" Off® its Parking ____ : City of Southlake Property ,,, . . 8 Head-In Spaces(Off-Site) Ballfiel {,:3-1, ,..- 7..,./ / , d ;..4-,,-,,; It } ; /7 {17 /4,F 4 ..,i r` , ' 26 On-Site Spaces $`` { fff� �/F F { ,r gljFar :// ,/.,;(4:////// . /E.:3. 1/71///' /4/ . ,/,,,,,7/ $ /7//,,,,, / //7/":„// „,-,/,/ //:,/,,,,,„,7//- % . / 7i, CD r) • Tennis 5 Parallel Spaces(Off-Site) Courts ,,i '-- 13 Head-In Spaces(Off Site) l fN Cl • Vd E S No Scale Southlake Blvd. Ioc-B • ,STAMa,r lAmeA r„ amIsserR,-E rr.,,essnw riAMe.lir Amurre.......MM,..ITr»,. .111•0•W*_,•....• .. . ..r..AW,...r GENERAL NOTE ;Amor(MAP PROPOSED 911E DATA BWIAf4T PPOPOffD SIZE DATA SMART r PAL `` \ 3h rr lw ul TOM TIMM(LOTS 2+01 ECKETDS(LOTS l+01 ��� mmgpylaym ��1Mpi�t�a ``l_ .wAoarerA2arvin!:W ..,al• urwv esaommaxurvanur PItn M. .- RZvRF1_.®aum.Ti ISVL_ILI a 9lRRF.A L�;9 ow.. .yYw •'mod 1i oaeumw loc i 8 aluwrid amv.e n' -,'._lei_"au nabs ___ 411- MIR HMA-_._ �06, _� oL1-gip- I GSM a L L r _- a,11. 001345 7 1 Ar-RE ^" ••T... PROPOSES 9)1E TABLLATDI(8-CTBI® PROP'OsEo SITE TABRLAT10NB TRACT TWO TOM T)LS (LOTS 2+31 BOLEROS ROTS 5♦0) TRACT ONE •6 ACRES DIY Cl 5UUINLAKE I r.l 30.4.'#Pn4aa .uworealaeo now P''""�'1'E CITY OP OW INTAKE VOLI0].0,PC 278 T '30144S. S Raparoe I•NI sr•,, .w m.as ru-r. TOL.1D346,P0270 U.R.T.E T. I �.1N 1 '0tir"•.nm m NI STU ,t.x.n,rn D.F.T.C.T. ZONED-CS 1 wtw w wvon r a... An-iprnnrto.., ,o•w nRr;. -ONLO-CS I.U.D.-PUBLIC PARKS/OPEN PAC -Rohr-rroi165ieo' r al,v'-0 wnalnn=eo®. -- .`w TNILLLN.o_no,® an v.as LNN uerocaiiamna • L.U.U.-PUBLIC PARKS/OPEN SPACE rRrvtvinoa® Ails.us I- _--_-_J a AT I,.,e. • II nnRO I . .a,.T.r te :• -\ R C 11,.1, wni."' r,,:.r"}+i..:,*c; ' W;Am�"'i 1 r..l,.s I.:r:'�:7 • ° w__I _f IT • • ...a. AT CA..lr.o _ Iv' 'rv'm-,1� .� _.._ o�. °r.rk ',,,��x��. ) •� 1AGIri1[ P ° # -T ' _�_ •'•."`---T'I 0 .. IEO.RLJ lION Tlu HNC MINI IMICC1.P lluou / -- --�i 11� OIT NE- lR4itD IO•all fIRMI_NL III 11aID NOON ImRA.o WTOaA 'i_ '").��((.��;/r 13•.,..' _.__-__ s r•;-.;.,:1 EC,i .[w.n r.a asrovu • I:w:T^-• /[ °,',.-%: A .N �.-•-•----,'--,F F - LOT 7 _- J - --_ 04Nm�s• ,. ..- . .ncal•..� - __i._0.c.a-..r , / 'a�" S-t MOAT N 9o-'1.tTE ]Ad+T 1 , t-`t-� u IS-o 1'r- awvn r.4.aT-- -- ------`in,Tf.Y-c.• ya*L_ / /'-----'-l�r --'-'�}"�neutim S. I g, - =- IT _--II --- 1; .,r -{(:�3,�.'•TS' '-<,� i ivy,r A.,.' r.r: ,'.i-,113/..'•.n-m1 -- nmuto yr :x-o-i-it:- .•. IV. - MOO..s.TwoeLL NC, -al .. --_W (�--- ------ LLA�II_... Nr- `' P sr o.Re :Ir ,::w.I.gt3: -:m..r.o..�.......non a 11 ..r _~� �� - x. .°4:a1.FX.Aa f _..q. 1 j� _ ,awn n_=t ,- P. .-.t. ,;;tl .a5 .L _ i is /vn�{' :i.•'A wroe o....¢u--q'•^ 1 "''�'" at.ANT 36111117302 Ill.03A110,.. nun°OON B4IPluuo ai ml0 5 707 VI I OT 34 MC:W M r.s r�i:ir;'.::ir. :I18 'a PRC-NOU:i NEll PARCEL OF LOT 2.BLOCK I L'l i ! 1 o- ff PEWTEIM TMLI®POOO STORE •' 1 '~',I - MITI nn 11. �a��- TO OE APPORTIONED TO CITY or SINJT11LAKF. ,.'4 �`1 SLIDPW'A' PJ�IPIO I•� "•1O' tll ?IIk 1I yAi atsaP.SL FETAL -.;I N..`.[TAM.If MM.nn.tw 11c 30.4 an.a ILK AM PUMA AO..STROM 1,1.0.1 ,IF ( 1- v /" s, eLLb01/" I IMAM. c . •n , or r�.(=11' �( / �// -I%ram• ,..W 'a. �rf/. x.:.µ.31,312'MA 112.6 y �11�n ea atm mn» •04 i'a 1•113.AS son wu'n'rnucrv`�NO 50X Lv Dont `sr PROJECT' X I i^ gire.0:1t13 n-4 V- ,l' ,-..E.'.... `� „VS _ T ern _:II (\ FOR. Irrl 111 - - - - -- ' w.,..'' PP1 r~C, r LOT Ps•LANMe� rATMS.N Tr.al AM PoR. A EWING N r.5:5N'R9'r 7bN9' N ee'YTTol r - • •}L a�.e, A 0__.. m• J_t��LJ L •,{I r'.I ` NORTH AMERICAN G LOT: BLOCK,'. a'. r21...r • _ am' y r.t� ..I '^ . Ir AI n r--� i MST AYER•CW SAVINGS 9N11(ApOt(. VP..:6' '�P la?M • y ,,,. ,_ • --- PROPERTIES 4r \ " PFA:LIM.PLAT VOL.106.101.PG.1629 � y[ - arw•rn.I�a..-r.-• r-. ___' _� a Pn� PR T.CO TX. a^•a _ .C?. ---Tr,t %.-,. Y r-,;,-w°TT'•I'I W 1 .• to usvtmv[oMnq're,r�INSAL Qww,om`.-°i•n'rI"r.0r<rv.w1 rtn..c Zd4CD S-P-2 • _ naOa P. .....,</.'': ��," CL i • 14990 LUImmark Boulevard L.U.L1.-RETAIL COMMERCIAL ...ilia[ _ -I � .'-' he '' '�L'' I]-: Q I_ t.a'.'nc' SUM 000 a.m 7 �.y •'�:>' Chi, P`1` :.m.,. _ Liar' •" nL •®'n '/ \ ••.v s%'�-• I-_• ZIT / FLOCK- DWaTeW 75240 ...,.••••••„1.•.ano LY`; ;�.,-L. ,,- IC i_,M1i; s.%1`,.. % %.- 1 . it `" �_ --J y \� / `.,'.\ / _p UI.r•. // CI.4MOTIU CIRCLE ESTATES SECOND INSTALLMENT 9,1E LECBtl 60t am $6"2.°.e-, I a - \ // \1'\. / - e) WL..Ti(B-IBI.PC.69 -- LOGO.)wow. nn N 6NOISIN%aR 106./161:0•10 E."4a�2Ti: l I ' mum..1RP!>m MMT4 Wool/]fef.. MU MOMS '``• ,rl__ . ; " Bj /Mmat se-.I ".ai .v•'t• ECICED ""1101.1.0.1. - \ ' ! ''-- / I-r. c_< L.ILLE-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0 normayme•. AND -____ ♦ ' 1n Al -- -i / • L .�u.. •Iv^h,-•.lo OF.P�. �{{{JCVNLI •. t ice:-.� 1RI / []ttslru:v.un,w I.,rtvu[a,r[n,ne " I'.):r,• ...n -✓( OITION.Or PARCEL'(( pATIR AI57'3 j •.'.4.-: •/ \ LOT 9 . 0..s-,MR TOM THUMB n.T, AMMO T70.30^Ir-- -- �I'3g3 L A. L Tor:!a t�RPory�'�Tp To cTr1 I 4TLz i:''Ir.iKomori (f."'.1:#:'•"w�aP. `\ s•.s ay.0 lil iswr nmlvr --`-- s• ;, -1 9..47 Ifi5(Mil!�9') d,'F"•'a-y-�:; ,. v l01 7 1R. ------ MSWAM a 3S m As .- _ A le Irene I k / • Lro-:,P= (rter,. 7.:157 1 /• I •-r�a `r r•Iuvn rmc.as.0 D. .t`TNL COLT LIPL I'' i. I `^r•'• �.:` ./-/ rai7a I N W10fE G1IYrli mow. --arm I T. - - I • ?) i ,0• 41!� I ;�CA1T Ftc. xe _ uT1 B ,touTllAKeBEw. --rvemmo „r r-A Ik '1 i F. I' \ I J:7(411: h�r- ': �� ' r �ti` r, / samu>�rexAs • .ea a v .T Ie-e ' __ a':E: ..�i1 ,0,,, ``an,e.. c•T 22.nr it I- L.14 w Al t:,� / IS � ol•A + \; },�' ' I�.T.T...'r': ^I ;5 I• 1• i ,n.ro;R !• a�-..-/...,-- - _ .s aoaen n,..,e y w.t1K 0 n<I..w1111 am.:.n -------1 I I �)�.' \\''''''..\. � Ea��,d 0. I I y'�.-"Fa.r...�! NEW ECKE(iD >., -`� -- --- - � ` 1 s: m, J ,,,[_- • /I Ret da / ��,'S+✓ ) , Jl 11 e I FLAMM'F ',-. �. ?.. -::f',rvf�a ""•iar w�wn�l••.w ,w r.rA -.1`I• _ , L iI namnl•. .e -- eo.Aansiv.00.WM..o.I 41'AHD _I I I LET ; \ '�-'� ,i -` I r TOmIt ice., T_ 1 .t __ REVISED AS^�. _ .-I',-'rm.."tt`•,';Si,:L�.�1 \ TT •.•r -..� i;t` r- \-.r /,: S°S"`x. w _ Lon SITE PLAN or -,,.uo#a P- _;}7jr1 //\\\ ss�i gr:: -11 .$ [ , ��ua MY IS IP1imliaM.VIVIi MT•1•s LL r nor 1716 • r-II�I11j, S I y/�` a. _ -1 � ; / ' 1Q'.a r- .Ta n^� I -W.W.IIALL arrvnva srm.amK wn¢au ure+a wet -nI`I ,rinan _, -I JT �` LOT JR II -I :r: :-1r•I•y'.. -y<'�:T(e.w..!110 G8'AC101O011 eGAtEF-aR .v n¢POI. rl }•• ' I - 'nl tt��VIEW rpl•:Tfillf-TI(NI OP In1PR/VEME 1� Y I:•-'(-.-�n -{T-TI_ �{.'1F.l1T• .��- { µ• fj F -OI 671.3 • war. ,+ J NOT INCLUDED IN TADULATIJ 16 1 " •`' -'-•'-'-�+-1�+- / f ..Iin'rT10° {:U 0'1 6TFICE N 2r n°�l J _ I ;, - ... _( �"Y cdnMERc1u. _ I �� ..Y idGyiCri -- _ SI�._ .w _. u`u�'..._"�'n: �w NM Iaurimas IRR.04[[i1 IMP rl� WPM (RIIl aaw i ~. 1 IJ �' t___-_ __ �.- ,a:.-.,Yc -ten �..: r^ , "'a13I�� -_wf__e'.P_%ePa_LBr's _ 10® n.w ma a. a• R. .ME 1 1.L-\'\{J.+-- - •.:.::..:'- '..•. - eiW" W � - ' �I - !13_deARP 1 IJ1 _ 'l ,•� � Ci�i � / :i:,,,. -iT`o.a;•I.u•j� �i � M.MT oeaf..Vnr Cavuntva -•-- / '� - _ +.r -w\0.]:Tl'1s' S•d'" RntYA 9• R=9r7.RS' re/si'/' :�'� 'i!'•. Ie r['•m'�o li Itn -_•Y_e_!�!}ISSIT_Mn u u,vtcr.n_ • . . _' .':. S#IZy P.;o5..r4' :T A.53 P5' ` L-:ERAS'- n�. 8Ifi1 r I+.i � - o i MAMMA. .n,r tlr.P..mI ac.aa. + o n.t..m.. -`T1.'k; -Y.n .r ... .s' v - y - -- cn.. ee oo':a ----- •I -_-_- ( ✓✓JJ T5� ---'-T-�a ndBY'Al _ y.Nu Le.--5 elt7.r�W CO..9S 6i -V..IT8 G1' -•rY�� l'i• __ LOT 1.BLOCK 2 _-� ..�f1t-`IRS'T ___ �..-.-- >•n _ -_ \ -_-_ -_._ LOTS 5 A 6 lST 0E -�_. _nRST AMEP.IC.N SAVINGS SANK A0014. ' r•K _� __--SOtJTFlC;4TCE BOl LEVARD(FM 1709) CJAWRTED TO A 3IFICLE LOT CASE.ZA98-134 CAD.A.0110E 1.T25 r_. -•rs /` - VARIABLE N1O111 N.O.'N -CONCRETE PAWKIEST 1.P.O8 ACRES(7].970`-F) ��� ,msT,�A.Me® P N.T CO.TX. ZONED-C2 ///'///i.'���.��o ZONED S-P-^. _- _- -� L.--�---' I -- L-F4Li.-ZOTED ------.CIAL `IV, u t5 So 15 I® �•• L.0 D.-RETAIL COMMERCIAL Cr:7RU�'EJ(RG CCIILER,ET.AL. \ NIITF."5 CHAPEL --_- ��`s.tl __------ VOL 11040,PI:.eDB r i� �...• -- - VOL 9'J7';v C.2371 CEMETERT ASS•;CIARpI ..r... [1(�('I�1 a�C��a ' I SP1-1h O.R.1.C.L zonal- O la lV. L o 1.�g.J � ^ONED-01 /L.1.1,0 -IYFl:;E CONMCRCIN IAA).-PUBLIC/SEMI--RMELIC SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY r ~ Case No.: ZA 98-156 Revised Review No: Three Date of Review: 02/02/99 Project Name: Zoning/Site Plan - Tom Thumb Center, being all of Lot 2 , Lot 3, and a portion of Lot 4 LGB Hall No. 686 Addition and including an additional unplatted 1.174 acre tract, in all being 7.691 acre APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Ewing North American Properties Twichell Architecture 14990 Landmark Boulevard STE 300 3624 Oak Lawn Ave. STE 3200 Dallas, TX 75240 Dallas, TX 75219 Phone : (214) 521-3066 Phone : (972) 866-9555 Fax : (214) 599-0583 Attn: Terry Clark Fax : (972) 866-9888 Attn: John Maggiore OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS,OF"SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 880. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards and interior landscaping. a. Provide"required" bufferyards and plantings in accordance with the attached chart. Proposed variations from the required bufferyards and landscape areas are indicated in the rows labeled as "provided" both on the attached chart provided with this review and the chart provided by the applicant on the site plan. (C.C.Action 1/15/99:Allow as proposed placing required plants elsewhere on the site or in Bicentennial Park) b. Provide"required" interior landscape areas and plantings in accordance with the attached chart. Proposed variations from the required landscape areas are indicated in the rows labeled as "provided" both on the attached chart provided with this review and the chart provided by the applicant on the site plan. Verify the area of interior landscaping__provided. Staff estimates that approximately 25, 376 sf has been provided. The Interior Landscape Chart on the site plan indicates 27,602 sf.,is provided. (C.C. Action 1/15/99:Allow as proposed placing required plants elsewhere on the site or in Bicentennial Park) c. Correct the graphic to clearly reflect all proposed interior landscape areas as shown on the Landscape Exhibit presented at the 1/15/99 City Council meeting. The crosshatching on some landscape islands does not match or is missing,. d. Parking and pavements are not permitted within bufferyards. The plan shows the following encroachments: I 1) Eight existing parking spaces adjacent to FM 1709 extend 10' ± into the 20' Type 0 Bufferyard. (C.C. Action 1/5/99:Allow as shown) IOC-ID 2) Existing Fire Lane along the west line of Lot 2R1 adjacent to Lot 1 and 2,'Block 2 First American Savings Bank Addition encroaches into the required 5' Type 'A' Bufferyard. Clarify the intent to provide the bufferyard through this area. It shown graphically and is shown not to be provided in the chart. (C.C. Action 1/5/99:Allow as shown) 3) Proposed parking along the west property line of proposed Lot 2R1 adjacent to Bicentennial Park encroaches into the required 10' Type `B' bufferyard. (C.C. Action 1/5/99:Allow as shown) 2. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways ingressing and egressing the site according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634: a. Provide the minimum driveway spacings as required by the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. Specifically, address the-following: 1) A minimum spacing of 250' is required between a service drive and any other type driveway along F.M. 1709. The existing service drive (Drive 'F') at the southwest corner of Lot 2R1 is approximately 123' from the next drive to the east (Drive `E'). (C.C. Action 1/5/99:Allow as shown) 2) A minimum spacing of 500' is required between full access drives along,F.M. 1709. The existing Drive `E' is approximately 382' from the full access driveway within the First American Savings Bank site to the west and is approximately 141' from the existing drive at the southwest corner of proposed Lot 4R(Texaco)to the east(Drive ). (C.C. Action 1/5/99:Allow as shown) 3) A minimum spacing of 500' is required between a full access driveway and a right of way intersection for drives along F.M. 1709. This distance is measured from the drive centerline to the R.O.W. line. The existing full access drive along F.M. 1709, within the proposed Lot 2R1 is approximately 338'from the intersection of N. White Chapel Blvd. (C.C. Action 1/15/99:Allow as shown) 4) A minimum spacing of 250' is required between drives along N. White Chapel Blvd. The southernmost existing drive within the proposed Lot 2R1 (Drive `C') is approximately 92'from the existing drive to the south (Drive `D') and approximately 183' from the existing drive to the north (Drive `B'). (C.C. Action 1/5/99: Allow as shown) 5) A minimum spacing of 250' is required between a service drive and any other type driveway along N. White Chapel Blvd. The existing northernmost service drive within the proposed Lot 2R1 (Drive 'A') is approximately 203' from the next drive to the south (Drive `B'). (C.C. Action 1/15/99:Allow as shown) 6) A right-in/right-out drive is required for drives intersecting an arterial within 250' of the intersection with F.M. 1709. The existing southernmost drive within the proposed Lot 2R1 (Drive `C') is approximately 223' from this intersection. (C.C. Action 1/15/99: Allow as shown) 10C-11 * The applicant should be aware that anticipated construction of a free right turn lane on southbound N. White Chapel Blvd. will affect the existing driveway approaches in that location. (Drives `C' & `D') b. A minimum stacking depth of 100'is required for all drives within the proposed Lot 2R1. The provided stacking depth are as follows: Drive E F.M. 1709 East Drive 34' Drive F F.M. 1709 West Service Drive 42' Drive C N. White Chapel South Drive 11' Drive B N. White Chapel Central Drive 29' Drive A N. White Chapel North Service Drive34' (C.C. Action 1/15/99:Allow as shown) 3. A minimum 10' screening wall is required to screen views of the loading docks and spaces intended for tractor trailer delivery. No wall is shown for the loading docks at the rear of the Tom Thumb building facing N. White Chapel Blvd. A screening wall must utilize a similar masonry material as the front facade. (C.C.Action 1/15/99:Requiring Additional Cedars in the "No Disturbance Zone"in lieu of 10'screen wall) 4. The following changes are required with regard to parking: a. Provide a minimum of 514 parking spaces for the proposed site. The applicant has proposed approximately 350 on-site parking spaces. Correct the provided spaces shown in the Site Data Summary to reflect only on-site parking. (C.C. Action 1/15/99:Allow 350 spaces instead of 514) b. Address the following with regard to the proposed off-site parking: 1) Remove off-site parking and pavements shown along the west side of the development located between the two most southerly transformers. Contact Ben Henry (X 824), Community Services Department, for specific guidance in coordinating any proposed off-site construction with the City's current Tennis Center construction. (C.C. Action 1/15/99: Allow off-site Parking and pavements along the west and accepting applicants commitment that spaces be constructed of grasscrete) 2) If relief is granted allowing off-site parking, a letter of permission from the property owner must be provided to the City prior to any such construction and a reciprocal parking agreement will be required to be in place. No documentation of such agreements have been provided to the City. 3) If relief is granted allowing off-site parking, ensure that curbs, grading, wheel stops, plant materials, and/or other physical features do not negatively impact the adjacent Tennis Center Development. Such negative impacts would include but not be limited to drainage, safety and any physical damage to facilities within the Tennis Center site. 4) If off-site parking is allowed, the total provided parking would be 376 spaces rather than the 379 spaces indicated in the Site Summary Chart. 10C',2 c. Provide head-in parking spaces with a minimum dimension of 9' X 18'. A number of spaces located along N. White Chapel Blvd. and along the common line with the proposed Lot 4R are shown as 8' X 18'. If relief is granted to allow such a reduced dimension, label the applicable spaces --Compact Parking 8' X 18' -- on the site plan. (C.C. Action 1/15/99:Allow as shown) 5. Show, label, and dimension existing and proposed easements on or adjacent to the site. The proposed Plat Revision for this site shows a 20' drainage easement along the common lot line with the Proposed Lot 4R. 6. Provide impervious coverage in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance Section 22.5-L This site exceeds the maximum permitted impervious coverage area of 75% for the "C-3" Zoning District. The applicant proposed 46, 551 sf of open space (13.9% of lot area) and approximately 288,451sf impervious area(86.1% impervious coverage). (C.C. Action 1/15/99:Allow.as shown on Landscape Exhibit presented at 1/15/99 C.C. meeting,) 7. The following changes are needed with regard to building elevations: a. Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.a is required on proposed buildings. Painted tilt wall construction as depicted on the north and west elevations of the Tom Thumb building does not comply with these requirements. On the Tom Thumb building, the south elevation and portions of the east elevation do not identify exterior wall materials. The retail strip building also does not identify exterior wall materials. Previous elevations have indicated that painted tilt wall is intended at several locations on these elevations. b. On the east elevation of the Tom Thumb building, areas to the north and south of the existing Eckerd's building are shown only in silhouette. Provide a detailed elevation drawing of these areas noting the type of materials intended_for walls, columnsl and other features. c. Insure that all mechanical equipment(roof or ground mounted)is properly screened from view with an appropriate roof system or an architectural feature which is integral to the building design. Screening of the Tom Thumb Building Mechanical Units has not been clearly demonstrated. d. Provide wall length and offset dimensions on all facades vertically and horizontally. e. Provide a plan view of the building footprint below the elevations of the retail building and correct the retail building footprint shown on the site plan to match . No horizontal articulation can be evaluated for this building. f. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. and Section 43.13.d .Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. (C.C.Action 1/15/99:accepting the articulation as discussed during the 10C.13 meeting.(Applicant agreed to meet all the vertical articulations shown to be deficient on the articulation chart and will meet the horizontal articulation on the south wall of Tom Thumb Building and the north and south walls of the Strip Retail Building. Variances will be granted for the following horizontal articulations:north,west and east sides ofthe Toni Thumb Building with the canopies,pilasters,and other design features discussed during the meeting and the east and west sides of the Strip Retail Building as discussed in the meeting) 8. Clarify the floor area shown for existing Building 'D'. As depicted, the "24,740 sf' number appears to incorrectly imply that the existing retail building is 24,740 sf. In fact, the total area for Buildings 'C', 'D' and 'E' (new and existing) is approximately 24,740 sf. Building 'D' appears to be approximately 15,155 square feet. Additional C.C. Actions 1/15/99: accepting the applicant's commitment to maintain the landscaping for perpetuity; allowing the applicant's engineers and city engineers to work together on the appropriate length and width of a right turn lane(and its transition)along White Chapel Blvd.;and accepting the applicant's commitment to appropriately shield exterior lighting. * This review is based on the "C-3"General Commercial District for the proposed Lot 2R1 and 2R2 * Coordinate with the City Parks Superintendent (Ben Henry X 824) and the Landscape Administrator (Keith Martin X 848) for the placement of the sidewalk shown near the "No-Disturbance Area". * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Protected trees cannot be removed outside of 6'from the proposed building without processing a Tree Removal Permit or without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Cuts or fills within the limits of the critical root zone of protected trees are not permitted unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator. * A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction or removal of off-site pavement. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Bufferyard Calculation Chart, Interior Landscape Summary Chart, Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Ewing North American Properties VIA FAX ABOVE Twichell Architecture VIA FAX ABOVE Bury& Pittman VIA FAX: (972) 991-0278 Attn: Brett Blankenship IDC14 David McMahan VIA FAX(817) 481-4074 f.` L:ICOMDEVIWP-FILES\REV198\98156SP3.WPD IOC ►5 • .-- ,,.,...»,~n, �,orsoo orreo...owrvr,.<•r.,g'.r. .,..m,.r..Ton.. ......n..,...nowur,,.,...,..rr*.r...,r..rroto,o rmo..r,,...,.r.°.,a m.or..1.,.rv«.n no,,..rro,.,.,...r.._.__� ._.Fr,oonoro.... ,..,..,nn. ..,.... ,_..m<,......_.so .n,...,.......n.<."..r- • -Ao•unirmew*owirorrsrro WIERAL NOTE ` 00.870 U. PFK1POSEO SITE DATA Bll•IAITY PROPOSED ERE DATA 81YAMY ra••n M.e.� rraum OWN `��4"•�'•. R1L01 TOR 1}U (LOTS 2+31 ECNEIDS 9_01115+6) 111�111 11 e.r�i calrwrt T'^ .•.oael:Ax .tal _ nn. r lIPEALWAAA•ma ���� _ S••wArt wl wom�.,suorr. u, ` Aai �lr ati0vnlVL'.. -_.rv"•.A•a••a-maw.aa w/d'12`�°�J-_"<2,a. yd 'alrltd nri.Q-- •ven - akq,na,T.u�-` (ss E _ C-Qilig wry.. .�.ry- - a nwcnio"g_ _ Le 4 .Plr -- - 1.12_01.1.�rv''�:o•- W•Maee-�f9. <0 L•1 CAN e.. 1111 9 ; wt•aar9erki. J 1 ACRE .arna..L. TC•A T H J 0..E TA2+311016-COLBJ® PROPOSED SITE 5f61)TABULATIONS , 6 ACRES TRACT TWO TOLA THAW 0.079 24 31 ECR80C ILOTB S+E) DIY Of SOUINLANC A<qo VIM. F avaNac•tonnr nlc..nc�l1! CITY TRACT OF S01 1NLAKr V01.10346.PG 2J8 I moat sr..r.•i:'m,.1«iAus -Br.T11.le1o3-i-0 -`- 0.1 VOL.l0.146.PO278 I I°Rar°r'.eM. 5000 zr.•V10e•In m.1X. lr.1 rv<.m p Sn s, • rwa;l,r:nv U.R.T.G.T. ZONED -Ca- -_warm rtuo._ o m•t,molea.® --- r 0• - ZONED-CS L.U.O.-PUBLIC PARKS/OPEN::'PC/ _ TO9Lrum _® •2/_brace ,�1C..111...o° ` x;•.cc� LU.U.-PUDLIC PARKS/OPEN SPACE TOTAL i•.Qurtawo 6a A0 1.1M<.Fr1arC® '1'Y.CTL •<m� `89�.4'S9'C 5161n• I iwf...,em I.T.1. • 11.11 �,,r ,;• ,°u'.,�"• .,.•1.. :IK ''• o ,.., w�.•1-�1'.I CM. .nr..wl.rt vlP 1 u..a•,u,uc- iuu;i'.u.^'- _�_ _-_F\\�.a„;,Dc_--'T`-:I.,' wWCNJ J_JilH '' 7 n 1.'J -- -11 .sri,- `'4 4"�`IJF�q., a RM@1 .memo LAMM AomR L91RJK160M G. _ �� testa welt® Loam evmJTlrt 1AltT Ma anal 1m<AlowreLa 304. TI 1,���y'I - -eo 5143.1 -'A w. ,..y;� --- iw u�or.✓ !- '`''•'• 1. ,J s a<iw.F. 101 2 MOH. Nr_�V'__-__I A - A E -L--1I(� wr 1•e Ir-o f ,1.,,,,Az�r.. I _ E /` L4r`'� . oar = - _/ n...r 1 I WOW.P.lwcaeLL•c .r or,... i �T�w'::1:r" a:w !r�.1-'N.._mi_c---q,77:4F sir m.o I i .r `:�- - 1-fir ..,r -• • - - •- - --21 w'.:,;c:n:- .al. rnr -.4 --\ i \- 'ii:a .n.o w.rA•<1¢.un 1. 1 a 1 ... -- - ---- . ..I I �r - q.a o r 13......•. y '...1 /". norluu 1a C 5 . T, PL.r.s I.. 0r.,.:n"'sn I I d FRL'N Dll!i MST PARCEL r"LOT:,BLOCK 1 "'I 1 / ` ��F NEWTDL 7MQ6 FOOD STORE• F mamma,u u r- -. \\ �M r.me.ww.<n wj n080 u 70.1111 ei ROMP FOR <i Joni Cr NC nv-.In a L 1^V ,^Il'1 TO BE APPLRTOIIEU TO CITY or Sf9JRILAKE I '/ 'f: ! r • 0nlwlxomr[�n I r/' �c '\w 9ADND-r!\ EIETTALL t ram'-: F.M RUPc 321.4111...1 ry91S^ 9.1VYf P Y�T Ii n Y 1,\ alLno9 1-- nn wa .1.4111 1; / �• _�y;. ;. RWflF. i-�r/' 00. K( 0v�,o,iM.JS...N�2¢9LTwN %w, A =11" .!Mi.,/ I- \ .I:7ZZ m".4III n«n.,.a,.,V n,n".. L PROJECT I: i:A..ZS0,8, t I} Cl ' �,-" If '. FOR. 1 .r..rae.w•.va..cran ' �_ T./innaM e'SKIO 11 VW/ .4119MIK L.MaJSO®1 I L..11`LG n AA5 r3.Dpc. MIS ^� aP..l (eoF.l f""L __-N C9Tm'09'w]siiL+'-------'--H O,*6O �•:. `f L Q . n-- �-LI�•�L1 i I� I LOT a -- --- NORTH AMERICAN �/ Lot 2,BLOCK 2 -- - - 1...�.o',. L_".::":`:...:.;-- '•,r ..... n, ,. PI ..1 PROPERTIES f1R:EL AYERICM ASI6 BANK ASON. r NE. •I` _, .Ir1w - .per' ' \ PRELIM.FEAT VOL.108.101,P0.Ifi26 I. term. - "•^r.`_,. (- _ _E-r4..m w P R.T.CO.TR. a^•'• _ .0 a� �, yir:{��� I-' 1 It IN III tnrA•Lanmuo.r..m"r,,....ar rtnw.¢. o--- ZMICO S-TA. I AtnnA 1,, --I 1'7 •Cr•`^ t EL 14293 LWIuA Backyard O L.U.O. -RETAIL COMMERCIAL .•.oat I, I. -i "� i F� •1RJ \-II,� (, t- 1' Q 1 m^<.ri v•a.. . ,n LL//,'' �'''�:.. \ _� � t_ 1 =v �'05 rnm1• nn•<a1 rm..0 w.u.lr.a nc �R Eau 772�0 ral &mown lr-al•ro 1.1;1.�'Mnr 1 III �N%`o 1--•,. J.,.',\ ,� ;_ I-- ..0 U j DIAMOND CIRCLE ESTATES SECOND INSTALLMENT SRELEce.3 1R,AINAIJ 1u1 n6.N s¢�;.:.' 1so 1'r'C. _ ..'•."• 'S \ / w•-`` 1.-. 14, rI } '' 'VOL.388-161.PG 89 - 1MAMR-'R.W®1 wme.o WW1 AL®Q EOM/.M®.o L."4a.'Vor { -- '• -, - IS se/ 1. P.R.T.C.T. �,,,PFn.1•..,..r. ECKERD'S wain rlye0J MOB MOWN,ISM gm eesv KIRD,2MDDI 1. 1. J1'-17% \'\ % .. .- - 1 II C ZONED SF-�1 _{ I <� \ L� I_r = \ L.U.D.-LOW DENSITY PESIDENOAL E�1"ArLATALO'• AND _--_ 0 ' 1e.• .0 IT. -. I -•"O'°'= �Ir 2 1C1 PE R(f, F.ICl/R.L1O„', >I• � 0 fnePro,.•.• a L..nu.<onwrr.n PROMO 379 e_ k,1 - - ----- IPA(t[] - CITION.r,'r e)tRfEL'T GPiFI uir"+1 ';MILT x 1 3> ` l0T 9 • 0CRAM rarR TOM THUMB .14 T. '-i .Y TOGG'Ai:4'WPC) 61,PB TO PET``.• - !' + / ly`•'r` -▪ -- �0: " -- -'-- -I 'f, dJVtl1 `lO DFry sLVGLE I�i�'�� 71, , Z !..1 •>- `-, '`` �� o.nruol la,•:4.1< CENTER a1^ --1 :u r dN NNo.68i.. Nr.N - ''- .� /-_'. ❑nnui...44.1ar 1.r rm..c outs ser ---- F *eamov -+ q p R.T.c IJ./ �; rL°gl=t}i l � i7'.1:M':5'.�L A -r nwl ram.m -- RENOVATION ---- -- - I. Y. rJ ! • ems++Z S AF.,-,1 Ef7 s:` �irf'j'.w�r•o /-•�}�-01. I---.1'........---.' -,r:u„,„,,,r ..„ 1•"•r f .,it,-r1� o. I I •-,{'.\ '�j o ".i:i no1S oR: K WHITE CHAPEL BLVD. - 2 -1 - LU.D.� .1:`[AIL Co;M fNl�•", � I • ,`r ' '\:,::. 4� �►�-7 order Tar- • - a a j 1 -- ' ' -"_ •Lrn ".<\ '7 :�.rr'1= .1.."`V[r�: nc nw P!u'an rnni¢s rooms NY,_ "---A ' .') tl \m /1 i<r-.'^_!•.,�•1 Y= -�'` `., �itw.,'�r ;5.771ri:'d`�w.n. LOT 8 90llrtl/IKE BLVD. •gin' _a,1 / \ \ �I: • 'j� 1 I / y11 �` � :vi . 'i_-2.[\.-`•..' / ISCUTHLAKE.TEXAS L ira .I-L ; , /l; ] ( 1 rT n '' N 74" V. w''... IE 1-• '..i/ `I .5O\•-' F•'i:., • •.• la _▪ s OD..mu M m1.vAc1.or-n<mown rru_- _ ---.___ � + i '10.9 - -, ) 1 ! ••-,tifiB'1 i NEW ECKERD 1C'`.•'-... ::, �..._/---____-_- d..e -.W 1 W TI } - \\ /1 \\ r4r / --.` 1\ �.n I 1 ������tttttt BUIXND F _ .I 1�Y':, ' • ,. _ _ I -'-ter \r` 11 nMDIR. ": fir',o,"¢.'uS m;"a ."iFr`.rn . '. 1 1 'd \ .\ :-����� �1 I { =C•rr_ ` . e o r .�'N _ } REVISED I.mcoliSt`-, :r u'I.1'-'\ J/ \\" .� .,. '� �`;kJ /� 1�'i I 1.H • SfTE PLAN ,rr'•SSm�<nis 'swam .Iu�rr seam on r en curare w . '- f 1.1,,,120 nF._ \'1�iJ''i�' �� `J ' 4 ---LI l':. ''''' r gg5� .• !...KW.HAIL F•W • `I ,•� • i T ��. \LOT dR I I -1 = �) �: iJ::A"y•- !' -1�t"...'".TYA,i...HO 1.67•ADbINON .AO I..a. n n.rt0..rn rtr.p„<w•a10 smw 1v< T'f •..-.a•r j 1 ll Yl IDI rp1:;TRUf-TIOt1 OR IMFP.OVENENI, w !' +-- -1- II__ 44�.• - ''kl I :.OTIED-01 ,� _. NOT INCLUDED IN TMULATI , I •' -'-�`�-1-�l' - 7 !>I_relic.•"L•�.1 i.'a"•°�,J y ..i 0 1 I '` -s. �i: �1 L' L . --L.Un.Ct'AAFFicEL --_ aona JxacTM (W.W.I Ru«r MOM nm.QAG,m <am 1 I •' air I `3di_V.ra{ IL%a��' 1' - - � _. !:I J•; Tara r;`. l _�,1 b•:<L�•'••6 r- ___�� • ,.�,�r1�'T1 1� FgarRo.• Tms rev ISM. 1mn1 I 1 -EST'S-- 1' I. 4Ltrt - --- -___--t u .:• '!....:et nn4:1•114..41.r.. .X. OP. .../.1r1°•..anew -_.._�.aEaweew _ '1\1• U5 R.29▪10]9' R+25N,}9' !]P -"� eYJ9'• I I`S°'°"'' -_+1-_srs ... '-' 9 elZS r•-W\P•,G51TG' ".5)45'. - `mil_.2310.1-. _ _ 61.1 __ 1 r .e (.e . 0•.10 c.v.., .•A 4..mr•m1 alwstO RAI IOW.OE .11.re.<.r.e..o. .n n..w.n L. --;evq z v' in...`;P]T'n_< '8''^'•" ---cs.5 ni'-Yim'a: :o s ee')dh w __._-----_.- r,',x Y1n:5 : - 8058 --- _ /FJ 2, '.6..5561' I CO. 1{6W' r ra.a.[.¢lOT 1.BLOCK 2r 1r 1w-/ , 1 .-Ott--le['•5' m _ ) M_r -- _F�,, -.-.__�--- 9m...n � r 1. ' � " AkE BO EVARD(FM 1709) r.UNERIEO TOA_fl1l}'l01 SE.u se-tea 7COiX. �� rt'r< y�- VAPIADLE M10TH R0Y -CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1.858 ACRES(73970'S)ZONED-a-P-2 � � -_ N u Js� -700 �9161D A�. L.U.D.-RETAIL COMMERCIAL -`-- 1._-� - / HiG--LEELEE_COMMERRCIAL •wr ��.--- �- ,_�F VOL R19JL�Fq E08R. T AL \ MITE'S CHAPEL --;BGMEf-a0 119 (•r SP1-1h - VOL.8V7'l.PC.2571 I CFNETERL A5000ADOA 'En ' 2 99 D R.T.C.L ZONED-CS INa:F-.iV-LL JJ ..O.rD 01 /I VA CE COMMLROAL.. . 0 I.U.U.- WAIN:/SEMI-FUPIJC+' . 1 Transcript of Case ZA 98-156 during City Council Work Session 2 February 2, 1999 3 4 Stacy: Is there anything new on the Tom Thumb thing since the last meeting, 5 Chris, you think we should discuss now? 6 Martin: Dennis, did you tell me you were going to get us another...or maybe that 7 was Keith. I didn't see mine when I walked in. 8 Killough: (Inaudible) 9 Legrand: (Inaudible) 10 Last: I believe, Mayor, a couple of discrepancies. We were unable to really 11 finalize the articulation review without some dimensions. That might be 12 some area worth talking through. And then I believe we.had a comment 13 there on a tilt-wall component that they had previously described and I 14 think the plans showed but we do not have a comment on our review 15 letter. 16 Killough: We also want to address the landscape area. They are in compliance with 17 the required area but there are just discrepancies between the plan you got 18 in your packet and (inaudible). 19 Stacy: Okay, is there anything that you know of that we should discuss at this 20 point; significant changes that might.... 21 McMahan: The only changes we made were in terms of trying to meet the 22 articulations as much as we could and also in making some architectural 23 changes that we had discussed that we would make. 24 Last: They did revise their site plan to correspond to that landscape plan that 25 they showed a picture of last time. 26 Martin: Well, I'll tell you, I think that this comment, must be on 7A, about the tilt- 27 up concrete, was a big surprise. You know, we met for several hours 28 discussing this and it is an illegal material. It can not be used in the 29 corridor overlay and you must come forward and ask for a specific 30 variance. I know you may have been choking on the number of variances 31 you're already asking for but this is serious and I think you're going to DC-11 1 1 need to rethink that material because I can tell you we're spending 2 millions and millions of dollars building a park next door to you and I just 3 don't really see how all those tilt-up panels would do anything except 4 harm us as we enjoy our park and spend our millions of dollars to enhance 5 the beauty and usefulness of our park area and then ultimately to be a 6 spitting distance from tilt-up concrete panels which are not allowed. They 7 can be allowed on certain variances but I really am surprised that it wasn't 8 brought forward to our attention, and freely admit it was noted on one 9 drawing that I had... 10 McMahan: It was not only noted, Councilman, but we discussed, in fact, the question 11 was asked from the Council beforehand as well as P&Z, it's in the 12 minutes. I believe it's in the minutes, yeah, they're tilt wall, and we talked 13 about the finish, and they'll be finished, not painted, but with a stucco type 14 finish, so that you would never be able to know whether it was a tilt-wall 15 behind it or concrete block or steel. You won't know. There is no 16 difference. 17 Last: Council, we have had that similar surface before but I believe the plans 18 actually, maybe incorrectly say painted tilt wall. 19 Martin: Yeah, that's what it says. 20 Last: So that may be something for the future. 21 McMahan: That's wrong, that is wrong. 22 Martin: And the areas where we have allowed tilt-up painted, tilt-up textured 23 panels have been along rear service drives that abut either a forested creek 24 or backs of other buildings or a undeveloped area that would be 25 commercial. 26 (unknown): The point here is though, if it's stucco exterior it's like saying, do you like 27 the shiny stuff or jip-lap on the front of your house. You don't see it. It 28 looks like stucco. Who can object to stucco? 29 Martin: Well, we would much prefer to have real masonry than stucco. 30 McMahan: Are you sure that you would rather have concrete block painted.... IOr' N 2 1 Martin: No, we can't have concrete block either, David; that'.s also a material 2 that's not allowed. 3 McMahan: So, what are you saying; a brick facing? Is what you're talking about? 4 Martin: Yeah, I mean there are materials that are masonry, it can be brick or stone, 5 but the point is that it faces our park within just a matter of a few feet 6 and.... 7 Stacy: It does today. 8 Martin: That's right and it's ugly as sin. It makes me want to vomit sometimes; 9 it's so bad. So again, we're over there building millions of dollars worth 10 of stuff for our citizens and we're going to look at the back side, and I 11 appreciate what y'all did on the back of the elevations of the retail strip.. 12 McMahan: We've been over those elevations several times with as many members as 13 we can talk about. I don't know what else to tell you other than it's always 14 been there. This is nothing new. It was there last time. 15 Martin: Yeah, but somehow the staff didn't catch it, (someone starts to interrupt) I 16 understand, I understand, but we all must go through the process with our 17 eyes open. 18 Stacy: What's the back of the existing building today? Not the (inaudible) part 19 but the other part that stays. 20 McMahan: It's all concrete block today. 21 Stacy: The existing strip part is concrete block. It's painted. 22 McMahan: Um-hmm, and it will be re-painted with added features which we added to 23 handle the articulation. 24 Martin: And that's very good, David. I wanted to compliment you on the new 25 elevation. It looked very good. 26 McMahan: Thank you. I think here, the point is, quite frankly, is when we all looked 27 at the elevation the last time at the last meeting and we discussed that back 28 elevation in depth, it was the look, not what it was made out of and we 29 made the changes and added the things on the look. I, frankly, have a 30 problem understanding what the sub-material has to do with what the look 31 is. 3 1DC•lq 1 Stacy: I remember we talked about the canopy and so forth. 2 McMahan: Yes, and the point is we showed that as stucco on the back and are you 3 really saying that stucco covering brick looks better than a concrete wall 4 covered with stucco? It's the same thing. It's a look your after and I think 5 we've given you that. 6 Martin: Well, I think part of it comes down, to if you comply on those facades, 7 with all the articulation requirements, both vertical and horizontal, on 8 those tilt-up panel walls then I think we'd have a cat of a different color; 9 but what we have today is not, as far as I understand, compliance on those 10 walls with the ordinance and part of it, I'm sure, is due to the fact that 11 making those small bump out and tilt-up becomes quite expensive, but it's 12 not near as bad as when you're using some other kind of masonry material 13 and thusly you end up with a... 14 McMahan: That's not the reason at all, Councilman. That's not correct. The reason 15 was, and we went through this ad nauseum, is the depth of the thing. We 16 couldn't get the trucks in. We can't get the car parks. None of that had 17 anything to do with what material is there. Not one little bit. 18 Stacy: Do you have the elevation of the west side? 19 McMahan: That it's going to be? 20 Stacy: Yeah, the new proposed one that's going to be..... 21 Martin: Yeah, the new west, the new north, and the new east are all going to be 22 tilt-up, right? 23 McMahan: Yeah. Well, the whole thing is, is this it? This is the west property. That's 24 the west. The back, and these are the ones to the park. Mike, where am I 25 here, bub. My contention is simply this; I appreciate what you're saying 26 but we didn't run any surprises on you here. This has been the same way 27 the whole time. And number two, and all that's been submitted, but the 28 look, all I'm saying is, I have a difficult time understanding what 29 difference it makes as to what the underlying material is as far as the look 30 is concerned. What difference does it make? What you're telling me is 4 1OC-2D 1 that you wouldn't say anything if that were all brick under there. So, 2 what's the difference? 3 Martin: Well, I mean I think that what appears to be your effort to adjust this 4 West; I'm sorry, that's the back. 5 McMahan: This is the North. 6 Martin: Right, that's the North. And I don't, we've know been provided any 7 elevations of the east-facing sections of the Tom Thumb. 8 unknown: I think we have. 9 McMahan: That's basically the back of the existing Eckerd's. 10 Martin: No, it sticks out past the Eckerd's, right? 11 McMahan: That's right, but that's all been presented before. 12 Martin: Have y'all seen that elevation? It's not in our packet. 13 Last: I believe it is, isn't it? (inaudible) 14 Martin: Whether there's a shaded box of anything behind the first, closest facade, 15 then the rest are merely shaded boxes. 16 Last: It may be, it may not be... - 17 Stacy: It would look just like the west I assume. 18 Martin: We don't know. 19 Stacy: Is it a plain wall or a... 20 Stacy: There it is. 21 McMahan: I don't know the answer to that question. Mr. Twitchell, can you? 22 Twitchell: It's going to follow the same concept as the north elevation. It'll just wrap 23 around. 24 Martin: So you're going to put the multi-color and some awnings and stuff on that 25 to break it up visually? 26 Twitchell: There's no awnings in back, but there's arches and the same amount of 27 multi-color wrapped around. 28 unknown: You can do that around here? 29 ' Twitchell: Yeah. 30 Stacy: They've gone to a lot of trouble to get the visual articulations. 5 IDC'21 r 1 Martin: Well, I understand it and I appreciate their commitment to meet those 2 vertical articulations; I just, your know, sort of buying a pig in a poke as 3 they say. If we don't see the elevations, then how do we know exactly 4 what they have committed to do? 5 McMahan: You're actually right as it relates to this, but the other elevations, we've 6 been added and that should have shown as well what we are committing to 7 you to do the same treatments and wrap it around. 8 Martin: Okay. David, on this rear truck loading dock that's on the west, I'm sorry, 9 the left side of that building, I see a single door from here, I don't have my 10 glasses on. ll Twitchell: Oh, that's the back. That's the existing... 12 McMahan: That's a door that exists in the back of Eckerd's today. That dock is more, 13 somewhere...I'm sorry. 14 Martin: Can I get you to put the one that's right, or take that one down, David, and 15 show us the one you have up there a minute ago that shows that west 16 facade. 17 McMahan: That's the West, right here. One thing that this doesn't show that we 18 agreed to do and they redrew it, when they redrew it they di'd it 19 incorrectly, is that instead of that flat canopies on the west side we agreed 20 to put the bubble canopy which we're still agreeing to do. It's a . . . 21 Martin: I mean, that's why I asked that about the canopies because we have the 22 articulation...on that side 23 McMahan: On this side, we agreed to put those bubble canopies on that side. 24 Stacy: Which is facing the park? 25 Martin: Right. 26 Stacy: On the other side actually is, I think, hidden by that grove of trees. 27 Martin: It will be somewhat hidden, that's right. 28 McMahan: We can't on the other side because there's a dumpster, if you remember, 29 • right where the canopy would be. But we can do the visual exactly like 30 that. 6 IOC.22 1 Martin: Right. I mean again it does face White's Chapel. As you look down the 2 service drive, you're going to see that portion of the wall. I guess, then, 3 David, I need to find out the . . . 4 McMahan: Well, we also agreed to plant some trees if you remember on that island 5 which would further hide not only the cars and the dumpster, but that 6 façade as well. 7 Martin: I understand. On the left end of that building there, the plan show a 8 secondary loading dock or a loading area, do you have doors in there? 9 McMahan: I don't see any of them. How does that set up, Mike? I think he's talking 10 about the one, the dock here on the west side. 11 Mike: We haven't figured out if there's going to be an overhead door there or 12 not. 13 Martin: I guess then we have the problem of how do you ultimately end up 14 screening those doors from the view to the park? If you're screening on 15 two sides then you've got no open side. 16 McMahan: This wall actually does. 17 Martin: It sure does. 18 McMahan: Okay, so you're talking about directly from the west, which you've got 19 your building, your own screening. You've got the windscreens on those 20 tennis courts and you can't see through the tennis courts to see the center 21 anyway. 22 Martin: We do have a,number of small t-ball fields and stuff just adjacent to that 23 area that would look right at that. Now it may partially be screened and 24 again I'm not saying it's wrong, I'm merely saying that it didn't show in 25 the elevations. 26 McMahan: What we can do there and we'll be happy to do that, if we have a site 27 plan? We have a site plan board...There is some area out there, that if 28 there's an area to plant, we'll be happy to do that again, the same thing we 29 volunteered to do over there, that if we were to add some cedars or 30 something that will do that, that's not a problem. 7 10C.13 1 Martin: And again, it just comes down to, we analyze this very complex problem, 2 David, with multiple variances that this stuff gets skipped, we're all not 3 perfect. We sometimes need to rely on second thoughts and that's why we 4 have two readings. 5 McMahan: That's fine. 6 Martin: And that was all my questions. 7 Stacy: My question is, looking at the variances requested, do you need relief on 8 everything that's on this list in order for someone to make a motion? 9 McMahan: We would like to get it approved exactly the way we got it approved last 10 time. Now, that means that, yes, we need the same variances. I believe 11 the Staff has come up with a couple of other comments, some of which I 12 think we can answer, some are not, but I know we can, glance...I just got 13 them, but a cursory glance at these tells me that we were going to be able 14 to work those out. I didn't see anything in there of any need. 15 Stacy: Things like correct the graphics and stuff; we don't need relief for that. 16 McMahan: No, that's correct. That actually, in reality, Mike, did you bring a . . . 17 Mike: I got a cardboard I can bring . . . 18 McMahan: That actually, it's just simply a question that the landscape plan had a 19 certain kind of hatching that the site plan didn't. We didn't evidently use 20 the same computer. 21 Stacy: I guess what I'm trying to clarify is, in the essence of time during the 22 public, the real meeting, if you and Mr. Last can get together and agree on 23 what you really do need. 24 McMahan: We'll do that during the executive session, yes. 25 Stacy: Is that okay with you, Mr. Last? 26 McMahan: We'll be happy to do that. 27 Stacy: Is that all right, Scott (Martin)? 28 Martin: Oh, yeah. That's fine. I mean I think there's only a few points we need to 29 clarify; otherwise, I think we've been through this for a while. 30 Stacy: Do any of the rest of you have questions about the Tom Thumb thing that 31 they might want to work on during the executive session? 8 1oc-211 1 Kendall: Well, I have a question. In this chart that talks about required interior 2 landscaping versus what's provided and if there's some reason for the big 3 difference? 4 McMahan: In the chart . . . 5 Kendall: Yes. 6 McMahan: I don't know. We just got that. And what I'll tell you is, and see:how 7 that's shaded, that's new to us. What I would tell you, my guess is that the 8 very two areas that they are questioning whether or not it's landscaping, is, 9 and that's how we have a larger number and they have a smaller number. 10 But I can't answer that because I don't know how they calculated it. 11 We'll get together and work that out. 12 Kendall: Okay. 13 Last: Our calculations actually show that they are providing more than what's 14 required. 15 Kendall: On the landscaping, the trees? I know that the green space is more, but on 16 the trees and shrubs, are they providing what's required? 17 McMahan: Well, we can't, but what we agreed to do there is anything we can't put on 18 site, we'll put in the park. That's what we agreed to do last time. 19 Kendall: That's what I'm asking, there's an agreement to do that? 20 McMahan: Yes. 21 Last: Plant materials are part of the motion from first reading's approval;was 22 that any required plant needed in interior or in the bufferyard that couldn't 23 be planted on site would be relocated to the park. 24 Kendall: So that's why that chart looks so off because it's going to be replanted. 25 McMahan: Right. 26 Stacy: Any questions about the plat revision? Do you have anything on that, 27 Greg, that needs to be pointed out? 28 Last: I don't believe there's any issues on the plat. 29 Stacy: Okay. 30 Martin: That new strip of parking with the two dumpsters directly adjacent to 31 the tennis courts, is that in this criteria? 9 IDC-25 1 Last: Yes, it's in one of our review comments on the site plan. There's a 2 comment from Parks to prohibit the parking that's adjacent to the 3 tennis courts and I believe David met with Parks and came to a 4 mutual conclusion that those stalls could be relocated to the north 5 parking lot. 6 Martin: Do we need to address that in the motion? 7 McMahan: Yes, because, in fact, please forgive me, it's my understanding; that 8 will require Council's approval because it does have to go into the 9 park to do that. That's my understanding. 10 Last: And the bufferyard, they'll be a north bufferyard so... 11 McMahan: We're willing to do that. We don't have a problem doing that; that's 12 totally up to y'all. 13 Martin: Do you guys have any kind of scale drawing for that estimate of where 14 and how far it's going to be into the park property? 15 McMahan: We have a 10-foot buffer as you assume, a 20-foot park, we're going 16 in another 10 feet and I think we've agreed to seven stalls moved 17 around there. We've turned the ones we're moving parallel. We have 18 five (5) parallel and we've moved seven (7) around to the back; and 19 that gives them more room for their drainage and greenery between 20 the courts and those particular stalls. 21 Martin: So we'll have to note that in our motion. We can't approve the site 22 plan when we know we're going to be moving some of them. Okay, I 23 appreciate you working on that too because it was way too close to 24 those fences. 25 Stacy: For the moment, let's skip down to the second readings in "f," "g," and 26 "h.". . . 27 28 I 1 '21p I 10 1 Transcript of Case ZA98-156 from the 2/2/99 City Council Meeting. ( 2 3 4 Mayor Stacy: The next item on our agenda is 7A, Ordinance No. -480-297, second 5 reading, rezoning and site plan for the Tom Thumb center. 6 7 KPG: Do you want the presentation? 8 • 9 Mayor Stacy: I think you should put it on the wall, yes ma'am. We discussed this quite a 10 bit during the work session this evening but we'll have a little refresher 11 here for the public's information and if there's anyone on the Council who 12 has a question about it. 13 14 KPG: ZA98-156 is a rezoning of Lot 3 and a portion of Lots and '4 of the 15 L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition and adding 1.174 acres out of the L.B.G. 16 Hall Survey as well, making a total 7.691 acres. You'll also be reviewing 17 the site plan for the Tom Thumb center. The property is located on the 18 northwest corner of the intersection of North White Chapel with F.M. 19 1709. The EPIPD-Southlake No. 1, limited partnership is the owner. The 20 applicant is Bury Pittman DFW, Inc. The property is currently zoned 21 "CS", "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" uses, excluding 22 those that are noted in'the staff memorandum. The request was!for, was 23 originally for "S-P-2" with "C-3" uses. They amended that request ':4 excluding all of the "C-3" uses previously approved and then also 5 excluding a movie theater. We sent out ten responses, or ten letters to 26 everyone within 200 feet and received one written response from Don 27 Mullman, 803 Pearl Drive in favor of the request. Also included were 28 persons living outside the 200 foot area, and in total there were a thousand 29 fifty-six responses in favor of the request. The Planning and Zoning 30 Commission at their January 7 meeting recommended to deny with a 4-2 31 vote. Council during the first reading on January 19 did recommend 32 approval subject to staff's review comments dated January the 15th with 33 certain modifications. You allowed the bufferyards as shown, provided the 34 applicant work with staff to relocate any plantings to the park area to the 35 north of the site. Also you allowed the existing parking that was in the 36 bufferyard areas, that they could remain. You also allowed the driveway 37 spacing and stacking depths as shown. You provided that there, in this no 38 disturbance zone, that there should be additional cedars planted there in 39 lieu of the 10' screening wall that would be placed in that area. You 40 allowed the 350 parking spaces as shown, accepting the 'applicant's 41 commitment to make some of the compact car sites here and then gain 42 some additional landscape in these islands and throughout the parking 43 lot as well. You allowed the impervious coverage as shown, given the 44 applicant's commitment on the additional landscaping. I think they now 45 have approximately 86% impervious coverage. On item 7B, on the 6 articulation, you accepted the applicant's commitment to meet all'vertical 1 106-17 1 articulation and then on the horizontal articulations on the south side of the. 2 Tom Thumb building, and also the north and the south of the retail building 3 as well. All others would be per the plan as shown previously. The 4 applicant was to take a look at providing additional parking on the 5 west side of the building. Also to shield any lighting from the 6 surrounding property owners over on the east side of White Chapel, and 7 also allow the grasscrete in the parking stalls along the entire west side. 8 And then, in response to Councilperson Edmondson's requirement to 9 maintain the landscaping in perpetuity. Due to the supermajority 'vote, and 10 due to the P&Z's denial, a supermajority is required, 6 of the 7 would have 11 to approve the plan. Now staff has provided you a revised review letter 12 No. 3, dated 2/2/99. You'll note in there, there was a comment about the 13 interior landscaping, there was some discrepancy, and I believe the 14 applicant has agreed to correcting that on the plan. We also discussed 15 during work session a painted tilt wall, on the north and west walls of Tom 16 Thumb, and I believe that issue has been resolved in work session. And 17 then there was also the need for additional information on the north and 18 south walls of Eckerd's on their, the articulation of the elevation plan. Are 19 there any other comments or questions we can address for you? 20 21 Edmondson: Karen, what did you say where the discrepancies on this part, that you 22 resolved in the work session? 23 4 KPG: The landscaping number, the 25,000 square feet versus the 27 'they had •- -5 shown, and I believe the applicant has agreed to correct that. 26 27 Edmondson: Okay. 28 29 Mayor Stacy: And we also, we discussed the west wall elevation in work session, and 30 they implied that the north wall that extends beyond the present:Eckerd's 31 would be done a similar way, with the two-toning and so forth. I'm sure 32 we'll see the elevation here again in a minute, but that's what I understood 33 at the work session. 34 35 Edmondson: All right. 36 37 Mayor Stacy: So that it's the same on all the way around there. Any other questions for 38 Karen? Thank you, Ms. Gandy. Is the applicant here? 39 40 David McMahan: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, ladies and gentlemen of the staff and 41 audience, my name is David McMahan, 1335 Hidden Glen, Southlake. I'm 42 here to represent the applicants and the owners in this zoning request. I'd 43 be happy to answer any questions you have. There were some changes that 44 we probably need to visit slightly about. The, in your review letter dated 45 2/2/99, well first let me say we are requesting approval as approved in the [6 prior meeting but then the staff added some new comments that I need to ivr•2 2 1 address at this time. One would be, and I want a clarification of this, if you 2 don't mind, item 3 where it talks about requiring additional cedars. It's my 3 recollection that in reality what we agreed to do and what you all wanted us 4 to do was work with staff because we don't know for sure that there's even 5 room for any additional cedars in there. But it was my recollection that we 6 agreed that we would work with the landscape architect, if there's room 7 and he wants them there we'll put them in, otherwise we would not because 8 we didn't want to overplant that area, so... 9 10 Mayor Stacy: I must apologize to you on that particular item because I've been instructed 11 by my wife to never vote for cedars `cause all of our kids are allergic to 12 them. I mean we don't want them in the back so... 13 14 McMahan: Well, we meant to say were firs... 15 16 Mayor Stacy: Some other kind of tree would be...I cannot vote for that. 17 18 McMahan: I understand. 19 20 Mayor Stacy: My mesquites... 21 22 Debra Edmondson: I won't vote for anything but cedars. I'm just kidding, Mayor, I'm just 23 kidding. ;4 25 Mayor Stacy: I might also add... 26 27 McMahan: This is good because there's a new strain called a cedar fir that we're going 28 to put in. 29 30 Mayor Stacy: I might also add we are one person short tonight so if you feel at any time 31 you might want to wait for a full Council, you have that right. 32 33 McMahan: I appreciate that, very much. I really just wanted that more as a point of 34 clarification and make sure we understood what it is we're supposed to do 35 on that. And then item 7A, is the only, all the other comments that they've 36 added we'll be happy to comply with, there's no problem there, except 7A 37 and where we're talking about the tilt but we went through that. That was a 38 mislabeling, it is not painted, it is stucco finish like all the rest like we 39 discussed it. And that's mislabeling on that part. With that, I'll be happy 40 to answer any questions. I believe I'm right on that. Greg was there, isn't 41 that correct? 42 43 Greg Last: I believe that's it. The articulation would be in accordance with the fairly 44 detailed review that we went through on the first reading. They have made 45 dramatic attempts toward complying with that and are out a couple of 6 places, but the motion would be the same as previously discussed. 1 QC"z 3 2 McMahan: And we can meet those. 3 4 Edmondson: Yeah, and that's what I'd like to discuss and I called David earlier in the 5 day. When I reviewed the elevations that were submitted with this plan, I 6 found that they were quite different from the pretty pictures brought in the 7 last time, at least on certain sides. So, my question to you is, which one is 8 correct? 9 10 McMahan: Well, what we are proposing is the latest renderings that we have shown 11 you. If the differences exist, and there are some differences, it was our 12 understanding, this was our interpretation of what we all agreed that we 13 would do, along with another meeting we had in depth with staff to work 14 out some articulation problems that we had, and let's get into it. This, I 15 believe, was one of your concerns, Councilmember Edmondson, was the 16 west side. 17 18 Edmondson: Yes. 19 20 McMahan: So let's talk about that one, and let's look at. This was the original, here. 21 Let me just hold that. Now what we didn't, what the architect failed to do, 22 and he's been chastised for this, is that we let these flat canopies which we 23 agreed to replace with the bubble canopy. We will replace those with the !4 bubble canopy as we agreed to do. They're simply not shown there, but 15 other than that, I don't know that, I think it's pretty close to what we had 26 before. In fact... 27 28 Edmondson: All right, what about the issue of the relief in the concrete? 29 30 Scott Martin: On the color drawing, David, it shows some splayed lines that go out from 31 the center of this little arc, and yet they don't appear on the bluelines that 32 we received in this packet. 33 34 McMahan: Okay, I couldn't, I can't respond to that because I didn't see the blueline, I 35 apologize. But these will be reveals. 36 37 Martin: Okay, and inside those I think you still show this radial line, two or three 38 radial lines, right David? And... 39 40 Edmondson: You will do that on the building? 41 42 McMahan: It will look like this. Mr. Twitchell? I'm getting that confirmed there, but 43 will look like this, what we're showing you right here. So, I really don't 44 think it's that different, Ms. Edmondson, other than the canopy's not on it. 45 6 Edmondson: Well, I think it was quite different. 1000 4 2 McMahan: Really? 3 4 Edmondson: Yes. 5 6 Mayor Stacy: Do you like it better? 7 8 Edmondson: Oh, yeah, I like what I agreed to last week. 9 10 Twitchell: She didn't see what you held up, David. Here's... 11 12 McMahan: I'm having some real trouble seeing the difference. 13 14 Edmondson: No, look at your blueline. 15 16 Mayor Stacy: No, well the bluelines doesn't have the reveals on it, yeah. 17 18 Edmondson: Right, the blueline didn't have any of that. 19 20 McMahan: But this is what we presented in the pretty pictures you referred to. 21 22 Mayor Stacy: So...right. 23 >,4 McMahan: Now those that you have... 15 26 Edmondson: All right, now the northern elevation on the Tom Thumb building. 27 28 McMahan: Which elevation, I'm sorry? 29 30 Edmondson: Northern. 31 32 Mayor Stacy: The north. 33 34 Edmondson: All right, that one also was quite different in the submittal from what I 35 believed I was voting for last week based on this drawing, colored drawing. 36 37 Mayor Stacy: Did you vote on the pretty picture? 38 39 Edmondson: Right. This is... 40 41 Mayor Stacy: The pretty picture. In the work session this evening they explained to us 42 that the pretty picture is what's before us. The bluelines... 43 44 McMahan: The bluelines have been resubmitted. 45 )6 Mayor Stacy: I know. 5 1DCA31 2 McMahan: But this is what, what we're presenting to you that we're going to do. This 3 is our intention right here. 4 5 Martin: Did our staff have copies of this? 6 7 GL: I'd like to as part of the motion hold those hostage until we get a set of 8 plans that complies with them. 9 10 Martin: Okay. 11 12 Edmondson: Oh, absolutely, because the elevations in here, particularly on the north and 13 west... 14 15 Ronnie Kendall: But can't we make our motion according to those drawing if we label the 16 drawings? 17 18 Mayor Stacy: Yes, ma'am. Certainly. 19 20 Martin: Yeah, but we just need them to be in Greg's possession. 21 22 GL: Yeah, they'll bring us a set of prints that match that... 23 4 McMahan: That's correct. JS 26 GL: ...in the next day or two, but I'd like to hold those until we get a set that 27 matches them. 28 29 Martin: Then they can have them back. 30 31 Mayor Stacy: We can actually number those drawings with this... 32 33 Kendall: Yeah, let's label them. 34 35 Edmondson: Rather than go over it point by point, let's just agree that the pretty pictures 36 will be part of the submission. 37 38 McMahan: That's fine. We have no problem with that. You bet. 39 40 Edmondson: Okay. All right, fine. 41 42 Mayor Stacy: Would you get her an extra copy of the pretty pictures? 43 44 Edmondson: I've got one. 45 6 Mayor Stacy: Okay. 6 1002 _ 1 2 Edmondson: That's how I noticed there was a difference. 3 4 Mayor Stacy: Then throw the blueline away. 5 6 Edmondson: All right, now, I know, I thought in our discussion, you had told me that 7 you were going, the 35' drive you said it was going to be reduced to a 30'? 8 9 McMahan: That one section? Yes. 10 11 Edmondson: Yeah, in front of the Tom Thumb. Right, you show it as a 35. 12 13 McMahan: I can't respond to that. 14 15 Mayor Stacy: Can you show me which one she's talking about on the wall here? 16 17 Twitchell?: Yes. This is mislabeled, it does say 35, once again...well, actually it's 25' 18 fireline, lane. There, it could very well be, but that's got to be 30 then. 19 20 McMahan?: That's just mislabeled. 21 22 Edmondson: That's what, okay, I wanted to check because you said you had dropped it 23 down to pick up... 4 - -5 Twitchell?: We did that because we picked up more... 26 27 Edmondson: Right, greenery. 28 29 McMahan: ...area here, that allowed us to change the radius on the curb and you notice 30 that we put that in. In fact, this is a colored rendering of it. It gives you a 31 little more idea. And the area I will point out that staff was talking about, 32 the crosshatching, this is crosshatched differently in a different type of 33 crosshatching, than is over here, but that is planting material in there. 34 That's that comment. 35 36 GL: Councilmember, can I make sure I understand fully on the 35' issue. He 37 had committed on that drive that's in front of the building to go to 30, but it 38 was not your intent for the drive that intersects White Chapel to also be 39 reduced, is that correct, because the way they've got it set up allows for 40 three lanes, one in... 41 42 Edmondson: Right, right, he had just re... 43 44 GL: Okay. 45 7 11C-, 3 1 Edmondson: And the only reason I bring it up is because it was the narrowing in that one 2 area that allows them to pick up some more green space. 3 4 McMahan: That's right, which we did, which we did. It was added to the islands, 5 essentially down here. Everything moved up and those were enlarged. 6 7 Edmondson: All right. 8 9 Kendall: But David, at our last meeting we talked about how this development was 10 going to increase traffic flow along White Chapel, and we talked about you 11 adding a third lane. Greg, is that something we should add to the motion? 12 13 GL: I'm sorry could you repeat it? 14 15 McMahan: Talking about, that we agreed to work with staff in widening this area 16 through here as a third lane, and that probably should be put in the motion. 17 I would agree with that. 18 19 Mayor Stacy: `Cause you've already donated the right-of-way for that. 20 21 McMahan: Yes. 22 �3 GL: For the right-of-way, there won't be a right-of-way dedication, an 4 additional right-of-way dedication there. There is on the next item, on the 45 plat on the south corner. We did say that the additional pavement width 26 would be part of the future negotiation on the developer's agreement, and 27 he had committed to do that. 28 29 Kendall: Okay, so that's just going to be covering the developers agreement? Okay. 30 31 Martin: Greg, was that included...t 32 33 KPG: In the previous motion, yes. 34 35 Martin: ...that motion last was so complicated that was included in the previous 36 motion? 37 38 GL: I think we did include that in the motion where we just stated that... 39 40 Kendall: `Cause when I read it again I didn't see it. 41 42 GL: I think it was in there. 43 44 KPG: Yeah. a5 8 1004 1 GL: It needs to state something to the effect that negotiations related to 2 additional drive lanes will be done during the developers agreement. 3 4 Kendall: Okay. That's in there somewhere? 5 6 KPG: Yeah, it was working with city staff to... 7 8 GL: Yeah, their engineers were going to meet with our engineers to resolve to 9 the extent and length, but the actual fiscal obligation would be resolved 10 during the developers agreement. But I think that would be good to add to 11 the motion. 12 13 Edmondson: And then you also had agreed to provide shields to keep the lighting on 14 site. 15 16 McMahan: That's right. 17 18 Edmondson: Correct? Okay. 19 20 McMahan: We will comply with the ordinances, with your new ordinances you have 21 on lighting, and provide the shields. 22 23 Edmondson: The new ordinances in lighting, is that what you said? 4 ' -5 McMahan: Um hmm. 26 27 Martin: We hadn't heard the new one. 28 29 McMahan: From this point in time. 30 31 Edmondson: Okay, because there is a new one coming, if you'd like to comply to that 32 one I'd be more than happy to accept that offer of compliance. 33 34 McMahan: I appreciate it, I think not, though, thank you. I do appreciate the 35 opportunity though. 36 37 Edmondson: All right, one other thing. What progress, if any, has been made regarding 38 the shutting down of the southernmost driveway along White Chapel? 39 40 Mayor Stacy: That I can confirm that through the city manager's efforts, the present 41 occupant has agreed to close that, I mean for us to close it, but he doesn't 42 want a median there. 43 44 Kendall: But he'd rather not have a median? 45 6 Mayor Stacy: Right. 9 , , 2 Edmondson: He means right across the driveway there. 3 4 Mayor Stacy: We can close the southernmost driveway and it goes into Magic Mike's, as 5 a part of this road widening and so forth, and he can enter from the next 6 driveway if that's acceptable to the Tom Thumb people and everybody 7 else. 8 9 Martin: That's tremendous. 10 11 Edmondson: Great, wonderful. 12 13 McMahan: ' That is acceptable. 14 15 Kendall: Yes, that's wonderful. That's very good, `cause that was the driveway I 16 was the most concerned about in this whole property. 17 18 Edmondson: Now will that be a private thing, I mean a separate thing or will it into this 19 somehow? 20 21 Curtis Hawk: I think we need to just get their acquiesce to that. 22 23 McMahan: We've agreed, we have no problem with that. Once again, I have, we have no authority... 15 26 Mayor Stacy: Correct. 27 28 McMahan: ...to say you can do it, we're saying we don't have a problem with it. 29 30 Edmondson: Okay. 31 32 Mayor Stacy: Mr. Farhat does not have a problem with it either as of today. Make it all 33 safer. 34 35 Edmondson: Wonderful. Good. 36 37 Mayor Stacy: All right, any other questions for Mr. McMahan? Thank you, sir. This is a 38 public hearing and I would like to open the public hearing at this time and 39 ask if there's anyone in the audience who would like to address the 40 Council? Seeing none, we'll close the public hearing. 41 42 Martin: David, I apologize, I'm making notes on this complicated motion. I forgot 43 to ask a question. 44 45 McMahan: Sure. 6 10 I OC-31 1 Martin: I would it appreciate it if when you guys detail that west portion of the 2 Tom, I'm sorry, the east portion of the Tom Thumb that is north of, right, 3 the one that doesn't have an elevation, and you've agreed to duplicate the 4 detailing work that's around the west and the north side, right? , Look at 5 that and see if you can come up with a canopy like the bubbles you're 6 going to do on the other side, break up that surface some so. There's such 7 a huge blank surface, and I think that will add enough emphasis to keep 8 people from looking behind the building as they drive by. 9 10 McMahan: I think I can commit to that. I will point out to you too, Councilmember 11 Martin, in the last meeting we had agreed and we added this and then 12 they'll be the trees planted and taller shrubs. These come out close to here. 13 So got a really thin sight corridor anyway, but yes we'll be happy to do it, 14 that's not a problem. 15 16 Martin: Thanks, that was all. You guys don't have any problem with the screening 17 of the mechanicals on top of the buildings, do you? It was just a general 18 note on the drawings, you all didn't ask for any relief from that. 19 20 McMahan: No. 21 22 Martin: Mr. Mayor, let me get all my numbers here. Mr. Mayor, I move we 23 approve case ZA98-156, pursuant to staff review letter No. 3 dated '4 2/2/99, the motion shall include all items in the previous motion, as well -5 as accepting the agreement on item 1B; on item 7A allow as, shown, 26 accept the applicant's commitment that all tilt-wall will have an 27 applied stucco finish; 7B, accepting the applicant's commitment to 28 provide an elevation on the east facade of Tom Thumb, north of the 29 Eckerd's, typical of the west elevation of Tom Thumb; accepting the 30 applicant's commitment to revise the west side canopies to a domed. 31 style; accepting the developers' agreement to construct the reveal, 32 painted accent areas, and domed canopies on that northeast section of 33 wall again, northeast of the Tom Thumb wall; revising item No. 3, let 34 me make sure I get this one right, requiring that the landscape 35 administrator agree to any placement of additional plant materials in 36 the no-disturbance zone in lieu of the 10' screening wall; and accepting 37 the applicant's commitment to comply completely with the vertical 38 articulation as at the last meeting; accepting the applicant's agreement 39 to leave with the staff the color renderings of the specific detailed 40 elevations for the design, detailing and materials used until subsequent 41 • construction drawings are resubmitted; agreeing that the applicant 42 shall bring forward at the time of the developers agreement the plans 43 to extend the full middle turn lane to beyond the main entrance in 44 front of the existing Eckerd's store today with the transition lane going 45 further north from there. 6 • 11 )DC-37 1 Edmondson: Second. 2 3 _McMahan: Mr. Mayor? 4 5 Mayor Stacy: Go ahead. 6 7 McMahan: `Cause we're missing something you guys want. Excuse me.; And it 8 occurs to me, and we discussed this in work session, that Ben Henry 9 with the Park Department talked with us about relocating 8;of these 10 car parks, I said 7 in work session, I'm sorry it's wrong. We'd turn 11 these, we'd have 5 parallel here, the demsey dumpter moves' down a 12 little bit, and then we would put those 8 here. I'm sorry, we'did talk 13 about that, but, we agreed to do that so I think you might want to add 14 that. 15 16 Martin: I forgot, I forgot. Okay, I will amend my motion, acknowledging the 17 applicant's agreement to relocate 8 parking spaces from adjacent to 18 the tennis courts as indicated this evening to northwest quadrant of the 19 site and accepting the commitment to come up with an agreement with 20 staff for some partial use of our property. 21 22 Edmondson: Amended second. ?3 GL: If I could offer one addition... - 25 26 Martin: Okay. 27 28 GL: ...would be the verification that that drive along the front goes to 30' even 29 though the plan shows 35. 30 31 Martin: Yeah, and I so amend my motion that the drive will in fact be 30 and not 35 32 as shown on the drawing. 33 34 GL: Just for clarification so there's no confusion, on the parking that will 35 go to the north, that property, although being used for some park 36 improvements is not technically park property, but it's still okay to put 37 that use there. 38 39 Martin: Right, it is not technically park property. You're absolutely correct. 40 41 Mayor Stacy: Can I have one.... 42 43 Martin: And also acknowledging, I'm sorry Mr. Mayor, that the triple lane entrance 44 shall not be affected by the reduction of the driveway. We'll still have the a5 three lanes off the middle of White Chapel. And further adding',that the 6 applicant has agreed to work with the property owner to the south in the 12 1 corner to eliminate the south most driveway on White Chapel Road to the 2 west. 3 4 Edmondson: Amended second. 5 6 Mayor Stacy: I have one question. And it may be that I was listening too fast. On that 7 northeast corner that's north of the Eckerd's, did you include canopies? 8 9 Martin: I really asked them to consider that, Mayor. 10 11 Mayor Stacy: I heard them say they weren't going to put canopies over there because of 12 the dumpster or something. 13 14 McMahan: Excuse me, where? 15 16 Martin: On that side just north of Eckerd's. On that wall. 17 18 Mayor Stacy: The part that extends...right. 19 20 McMahan: Here, we said we would look at it. I do have a question. On working on 21 the driveway you were referring to this driveway? 22 23 Martin: I said the south-most driveway. 25 McMahan: You said going off to the west or coming to the west `cause I heard west at 26 the last, I want to make sure... 27 28 Mayor Stacy: The southernmost entrance then. 29 30 Martin: It accesses White Chapel west, onto that subject property. 31 32 McMahan: Okay. 33 34 Mayor Stacy: Okay, any other questions or suggestions to that complex... 35 36 GL: On the canopy north of the old Eckerd's building, is that at their option? Is 37 that something they're going to look at? 38 39 McMahan: We'll do it. 40 41 GL: Okay. 42 43 Mayor Stacy: Are you going to look at it or do it? Any other questions? Call for the 44 vote. 45 46 Sandy Legrand: Councilmember Edmondson? 13 IOC-31 2 Edmondson: Yes. 3 4 SL: Councilmember Evans? 5 6 Ralph Evans: Yes, ma'am. 7 8 SL: Councilmember Kendall? 9 10 Kendall: Yes. 11 12 SL: Councilmember Moffat? 13 14 Wayne Moffat: Yes, ma'am. 15 16 SL: Councilmember Martin? 17 18 Martin: Yes, ma'am. 19 20 SL: Mayor Stacy? 21 22 Mayor Stacy: Yes, ma'am. Approved 6-0. Thank you. The next item is 7B, ZA98-135, 23 Plat Revision for the same subject property... 14 10C-LID City of Southlake, Texas Prr ' MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Shawn Poe, Senior Civil Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Award of bid to JRJ Paving, Inc. for the reconstruction of Harrell Drive from Johnson Road to Jordan Drive Action Requested: Staff requests the City Council to award the bid to for the reconstruction of Harrell Drive from Johnson Road to Jordan Drive to JRJ Paving, Inc. of Dallas, TX in the amount of$160,763.43. Background Information: Harrell Dr. will be reconstructed from Johnson Rd. to Jordan Dr. (see attached project map). The scope of the project includes repaving Harrell Dr. with 4" of Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete (f IlMAC). The width'of Harrell Dr. will not change. Harrell Dr. is approximately 22' wide (two-lanes) except along the frontage of Florence Elementary where the width is approximately 33' wide(3-lanes). ftFinancial Considerations: As part of the Neighborhood Street Program, the FY 1998-99 CIP budget appropriated $140,000 for the engineering and reconstruction :of Harrell Dr. from Johnson Rd. to Jordan Dr.. The City received 8 bids for this project. The low bidder was JRJ Paving, Inc. for the amount of $160,763.43 (see attached bid tabulation). - - The costs associated with this project are tabulated below: Engineering, Testing $ 114,700.00 Construction $160,763.43 Total $175,463.63 The total cost is $35,463.63 above the budgeted amount. During the design of this project, it was determined that several drainage problems existed and needed to be corrected. These drainage problems; were not known at the time of estimation. Therefore, the estimate did not account for the additional cost to correct the drainage issues. Utilizing funds that exist from completed projects constructed under budget will fund the cost overrun. This project has been added to the attached CIP Project Cost Ledger. O. , 1OD-1 - City of Southlake, Texas - - — Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: Not applicable. Alternatives: None. Supporting Documents: Project Map Bid tabulation for Harrell Drive reconstruction CIP Project Cost Ledger Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council award the bid to JRJ Paving, Inc. for the reconstruction of Harrell Drive in the amount of $160,763.43. Please place this item on the April 4, 2000 Regular City Council Agenda for review and consideration. VS2E- SEP/sep IIli , O. 10D-2 ' Reconstruction:: '.Lira its of 3- Lanes :s:r•a,., _ - -- - -- - -- -- - -- .- .. • Flo pence : _ school : Li nits of 2 Lanes ;: - - •. - : - _ - _-- '- : -jai`_ ;?.'.� zx:a:u:::rl::cih: ::u-+'Tw'.r"y".•,G:i�:: :E ..."Gray: . .: : .: .: .: ": -: .. : -= = = -= -=- : = - _=:• -= O - - ' - ' - . . - . . - �:S®uthlake:Blvd • -- - - -- - - - - - 1111 Harrell Drive Paving vements-Bid Tabulation Bid Openin 3,2000 2:00 p.m. 40. Bidder: JRJ Paving,Inc. Peachtree Constr.,Inc. Sutter&Associates,Inc. Reynolds Asphalt&Const.Co. Pay Approx. Extended Extended Item Quantity Units Description of Bid Item Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price Amount 1 1 LS Mobilization(Max 5%TEA) $ 5,100.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 2 7,241 SY 6"Subgrade scarify/pulverize pavement/ $ 1.27 $ 9,196.07 $ 2.70 $ 19,550.70 $ 2.10 $ 15,206.10 $ 2.00 $ 14,482.00 compaction/fine grading 3 1 LS Unclassified excavation(ditches/subgrade) $ 6,400.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 10,500.00 $ 10,500.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 4 108.63 Ton Cement(est.@ 301bs/sy)(field verify) $ 104.00 $ 11,297.52 $ 110.00 $ 11,949.30 $ 110.00 $ 11,949.30 $ 112.00 $ 12,166.56 5 744.04 Ton 2"Type"B"HMAC base course $ 32.39 $ 24,099.46 $ 37.00 $ 27,529.48 $ 35.80 $ 26,636.63 $ 32.00 $ 23,809.28 6 744.04 Ton 2"Type"D"HMAC surface course $ 33.92 $ 25,237.84 $ 37.00 $ 27,529.48 $ 37.00 $ 27,529.48 $ 33.00 $ 24,553.32 7 6,764 SY Asphalt tack coat $ 0.08 $ 541.12 $ 0.10 $ 676.40 $ 0.07 $ 473.48 $ 0.25 $ 1,691.00 8 7,241 SY Asphalt prime coat $ 0.23 $ 1,665.43 $ 0.25 $ 1,810.25 $ 0.07 $ 506.87 $ 0.15 $ 1,086.15 9 6,764 SY Petromat $ 0.80 $ 5,411.20 $ 0.85 $ 5,749.40 $ 1.15 $ 7,778.60 $ 1.00 $ 6,764.00 10 110 LF 18"Cl.III RCP culvert $ 64.00 $ 7,040.00 $ 57.00 $ 6,270.00 $ 52.00 $ 5,720.00 $ 28.00 $ 3,080.00 11 20 LF 24"Cl.III RCP culvert $ 85.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 72.00 $ 1,440.00 $ 60.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 90.00 $ 1,800.00 12 4 Ea. 18"R.C.safety end headwall $ 1,110.00 $ 4,440.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 805.00 $ 3,220.00 $ 300.00 $ 1,200.00 13 1 Ea. Type"A"Headwall $ 950.00 $ 950.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 2,310.00 $ 2,310.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 14 1 Ea. Type"B"Headwall • $ 1,070.00 $ 1,070.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 15 1 Ea. Skewed R.C.storm drain vault $ 2,650.00 $ 2,650.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 3,450.00 $ 3,450.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 16 70 CY Limestone rock apron $ 58.50 $ 4,095.00 $ 60.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 100.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 60.00 $ 4,200.00 _, 17 1 Ea. Reid:concrete apron $ 950.00 $ 950.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,035.00 $ 1,035.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 0 18 8 Ea. 6"Type"D"HMAC driveway transition w/. $ 165.00 $ 1,320.00 $ 250.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 275.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 150.00 $ 1,200.00 sawcut _ 19 1 Ea. 6"Reinf.concrete driveway $ 5,770.00 $ 5,770.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 9,200.00 $ 9,200.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 20 1 Ea. 6"HMAC driveway $ 660.00 $ 660.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 550.00 $ 550.00 21 1 LS Project signs(2)/traffic control $ 3,900.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 2,760.00 $ 2,760.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 22 4 Ea. Manhole lid adjustment $ 180.00 $ 720.00 $ 400.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 450.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 550.00 $ 2,200.00 23 2 Ea. Water line valve box adjustment _ $ 100.00 $ 200.00 $ 300.00 $ 600.00 $ 400.00 $ 800.00 $ 300.00 $ 600.00 24 1 LS Landscape repair/replacement w/.sod $ 14,900.00 $ 14,900.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 13,500.00 $ 13,500.00 25 1 LS Roadway markings and signs $ 7,900.00 $ 7,900.00 $ 7,400.00 $ 7,400.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 26 1 LS Stormwater pollution and prevention $ 3,550.00 $ 3,550.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 27 1 LS Discretionary allowance for unforeseen $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 circumstances Actual Amount Bid $ 160,763.63 $ 183,605.01 $ 188,175.46 $ 190,082.31 Written Amount Bid $160,764.63 $183,605.01 $188,175.47 $190,082.31 Bid bond provided? Yes Yes Yes Yes Power-of-Attorney? Yes Yes Yes Yes Addenda attached? 1 1 1 1 Bid Order 1 2 l 3 4 Eng.: Belcheff&Associates,Inc. Certified by: Date: harrell bidtab.xls 3/30/00 Harrell Drive Paving vements-Bid Tabulation 0 Bid Opening 3,2000 2:00 p.m. Bidder: Branch and Sons Contractors, All-Tex Paving,Inc. Pavecon,Inc. APAC-Texas,Inc. by.. Approx. Extended Extended Extended Item Quantity Units Description of Bid Item Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price Amount 1 1 LS Mobilization(Max 5%TEA) $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 3,550.00 $ 3,550.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00_ 2 7,241 SY 6"Subgrade scarify/pulverize pavement/ $' 3.25 $ 23,533.25 $ 2.00 $ 14,482.00 $ 3.00 $ 21,723.00 $ 2.10 $ 15,206.10 compaction/fine grading 3 1 LS Unclassified excavation(ditches/subgrade) $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 66,000.00 $ 66,000.00 4 108.63 Ton Cement(est.@ 30 lbs/sy)(field verify) $ 100.00 $ 10,863.00 $ 110.00 $ 11,949.30 $ 110.00 $ 11,949.30 $ 100.00 $ 10,863.00 5 744.04 Ton 2"Type'B"HMAC base course $ 32.50 $ 24,181.30 $ 38.00 $ 28,273.52 $ 38.00 $ 28,273.52 $ 33.00 $ 24,553.32 6 744.04 Ton 2"Type"D"HMAC surface course $. 33.50 $ 24,925.34 $ 38.00 $ 28,273.52 $ 38.00 $ 28,273.52 $ 39.00 $ 29,017.56 7 6,764 SY Asphalt tack coat $ 0.05 $ 338.20 $ 0.20 $ 1,352.80 $ 0.13 $ 879.32 $ 0.20 $ 1,352.80 8 7,241 SY Asphalt prime coat $ 0.20 $ 1,448.20 $ 0.40 $ 2,896.40 $ 0.63 $ 4,561.83 $ 0.50 $ 3,620.50 9 6,764 SY Petromat $ 1.50 $ 10,146.00 $ 2.00 $ 13,528.00 $ 1.55 $ 10,484.20 $ 1.30 $ 8,793.20 10 110 LF 18"Cl.III RCP culvert $ 90.00 $ 9,900.00 $ 50.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 69.82 $ 7,680.20 $ 47.00 $ 5,170.00 11 20 LF 24"Cl.III RCP culvert $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 60.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 78.15 $ 1,563.00 $ 55.00 $ 1,100.00 12 4 Ea. 18"R.C.safety end headwall $ 1,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 1,250.44 $ 5,001.76 $ 720.00 $ 2,880.00 13 1 Ea. Type"A"Headwall $" 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 14 1 Ea. Type"B"Headwall $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 15 1 Ea. Skewed R.C.storm drain vault $ 4,000.00 -$ 4,000.00 $ 5,000.00 .$ 5,000.00 $• 4,850.00 $ 4,850.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 3,100.00 16 70 CY Limestone rock apron $ 40.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 80.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 85.7143 $ 6,000.00 $ 73.00 $ 5,110.00 17 1 Ea. Reinf.concrete apron $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 930.00 $ 930.00 18 8 Ea. 6"Type"D"HMAC driveway transition w/. $ 700.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 300.00-$ 2,400.00 $ 550.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 8,000.00 0 sawcut CI 19 1 Ea. 6"Reinf.concrete driveway $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 6,350.00 $ 6,350.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 rl 20 1 Ea. 6"HMAC driveway $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00" $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 2,600.00 21 1 LS Project signs(2)/traffic control $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200.00 22 4 Ea. Manhole lid adjustment .$ 250.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 220.00 $ 880.00 $ 350.00 $ 1,400.00 23 2 Ea. Water line valve box adjustment $ 150.00 $ 300.00 $ 400.00 $ 800.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 275.00 $ 550.00 24 1 LS Landscape repair/replacementw/.sod $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 6,800.00 $ 6,800.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 16,800.00 $ 16,800.00 25 1 LS Roadway markings and signs $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00 26 1 LS Stormwater pollution and prevention $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 4,900.00 $ 4,900.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 3,900.00 27 1 LS Discretionary allowance for unforeseen $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 circumstances Actual Amount Bid $ 193,535.29, $ 199,355.54 $ 211,369.65' $ 254,246.48 Written Amount Bid $193,535.29 $199,355.54 $211,369.28 $254,246.48 Bid bond provided? Yes Yes Yes Yes Power-of-Attorney? Yes Yes Yes Yes Addenda attached? 1 1 1 _ 1 Bid Order 5 6 , 7 8 Eng.: Belcheff&Associates,Inc. • harrell bidtab.xls 3/30/00 CIP PROJECT COSTS /PI° A B I C o 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGETED AMOUNT BID/FINAL COST DIFFERENCE 2 1.5 MGD MIRON ELEVATED TOWER* $1,860,000 $1,832,0000 $28,000 3 20"WATERLINE ALONG FM 1709 $641,000 $638,408 $2,592 4 24"WATER LINE ALONG N.WHITE CHAPEL $850,000 $826,455 $23,545 5 BRUMLOW $112,700 $111,000 $1,700 6 BURNEY LN.-REHAB CUL-DE-SAC $57,000 $64,523 ($7,523) 7 BYRON NELSON STOP LIGHT $40,000 $65,000 ($25,000) 8 BYRON NELSON STRIPING $65,000 $65,637 ($637) 9 COMMERCE TRAFFIC LIGHT* $100,000 $48,405 $51,595 10 DIAMOND CIRCLE STREETS&SEWER $1,286,000 $990,161 $295,839 11 DOVE ACRES SEWER* $405,000 $205,474 $199,526 12 DOVE ESTATES LIFT STATION* $300,000 $167,473 . $132,527 13 DOVE FORCE MAIN* $1,747,500 $2,113,218 ($365,718) 14 DOVE/HIGHLAND PAVING* $611,480 $778,533 ($167,053) 15 DOVE/SH 114 WATER LINE RELOCATION $339,200 $280,424 $58,776 16 FLORENCE TOWER TANK PAINTING $105,000 $152,200 ($47,200) 17 FM 1709 TRAFFIC SEQUENCING* $120,000 $42,000 $78,000 18 FM 1709 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONVERSIONS* $200,000 $123,399 $76,601 19 HARRELL DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION* $140,000 $175,464 ($35,464) 20 HILLWOOD SEWER* $95,000 $82,415 $12,586 21 HUNTWICK ESTATES SEWER I $200,000 $276,123 ($76,123) 22 JELLICO SEWER* $500,000 $419,723 $80,277 23 KIRKWOOD WATERLINE $326,000 $266,159 $59,841 24 LAKE DRIVE WATER,SEWER,PAVING* $364,500 $376,991, ($12,491) 25 LILAC LN.WATER,SEWER,STREET* $234,600 $286,782 ($52,182) 26 LOVE HENRY COURT SEWER&STREET* $359,000 $401,474 ($42,474) 27 MISSION HILL SEWER $430,000 $489,099 ($59,099) 0 8 N.WHITE CHAPEL-COUNTY LINE TO LAKE* $340,000 $470,970 ($130,970) 9 N.WHITE CHAPEL-DOVE TO COUNTY LINE* $181,850 $177,010 $4,840 30 N-3&N-4 LIFT STATIONS* $1,000,000 $1,009,500 ($9,500) 31 N-5 SEWER&KIMBALL/SH 114 WATER/SEWER RELOCATIONS* $762,500 $743,255 $19,245 32 NAPA VALLEEY/WOODLAND HEIGHTS WATER LINE* $30,000 $59,960 ($29,960) 33 PEARSON GROUND STORAGE TANK NO.2* $1,687,400 $1,545,247 $142,153 34 PINE SEWER* $200,000 $183,368 $16,632 35 PLANTATION SEWER $110,400 $84,676 $25,724 36 PUBLIC WORKS CENTER IMPROVEMENTS* $405,600 $472,580 ($66,980) 37 PUMP STATION NO.2* $3,110,000 $3,176,800 ($66,800) 38 RAINTREE/SHADY LN WATER,SEWER,PAVING ' $1,925,995 $1,615,029 $310,966 39 RIDGECREST* $355,576 $400,504 ($44,928) 40 SABRE SEWER CONNECTION-SOLANA $25,000 $21,700 $3,300_ 41 SHADY OAKS TRAFFIC LIGHT* $100,000 $91,000 $9,000 42 SOUTHLAKE/KELLER PUMP STATION MOD. $300,000 $116,281 $183,720 43 SUTTON PLACE DRAINGE&PAVING IMPROVEMENTS* . $270,000 $311,865 ($41,865) 44 TIMARRON-BENT CREEK REPAIR* $726,986 $699,315 $27,671 45 TROPHY CLUB 24 WATER LINE* $1,511,000 $1,440,693 $70,307 46 W.CONTINENTAL RECON.-PHASE 1* $640,424 $731,161 ($90,737) 47 W.DOVE RECON:PEYTONVILLE TO SHADY OAKS $259,680 $298,397' ' ($38,717) 48 W.JONES BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS* $1,000,000 $930,522 '$69,478 49 WATER&SEWER TO MIRON ADDITION $196,781 $262,535 ($65,754) 50 TOTAL $26,628,172 $26,120,906 51 TOTAL(OVER)/UNDER BUDGET $507,266 52 53 *Project not yet complete. Cost shown reflects contract bid price&engineering,surveying costs O. 1 OD-6 3/30/00 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 2000 IF TO: Billy Campbell, City Manager FROM: Shawn Poe, Senior Civil Engineer, extension 846 SUBJECT: Award of bid to Whizcon Utilities, Inc. for the installation of water line improvements to serve Napa Valley Estates and Woodland Heights Addition Action Requested: Staff requests the City Council to award the bid for the installation of water line improvements to serve Napa Valley Estates and Woodland Heights Addition to Whizcon Utilities, Inc. of Arlington, TX in the amount of$54,460. Background Information: During the past few summers, residents in Napa Valley Estates along Burgundy Court have experienced water pressure fluctuations. These fluctuations have usually occurred during the peak morning usage times. During these times, the level of the water in the elevated tanks is at the lowest. Consequently, the water pressure may fluctuate in areas where the topography elevation increases, such as at the top of hills. Furthermore, the water pressure fluctuations in these areas are exacerbated if the water line is a dead-end line (served only from one direction). Burgundy Court is currently served by a 6" water line. This water line dead-ends at the end of the cul-de-sac, which is at the top of a hill (see attached project map). Woodland Heights is served by an 8" water line located along Westwood. The developer of Cambridge Crossing stubbed an 8" water line from Chatham Court to the southwest corner of the Woodland Heights Addition. This project will interconnect the existing 6" water line located on Burgundy Ct., the 8" water line located in Woodland Heights, and the 8" water line stub-out in Cambridge Crossing. The intent of this project is , twofold. First of all, the water line improvements will sustain the water pressure for the residents in this area. Therefore in times of peak usage, the water pressure will not fluctuate because the water lines will be fed from more than one direction. Second, these improvements will provide a "looped" system. Therefore, water service disruptions are less likely to occur in the event of a water line break. _ The City owns a Tract of land along the north property line of Lot 10-R in Woodland Heights (as shown on project map). The water line improvements for this project will be installed within existing easements and on the City owned tract. Staff intends to have this project complete 10E- 1 City of Southlake, Texas prior to the water usage increasing substantially, primarily due to irrigation. r al rations: The City received 3 bids for this project. The low bidder was Whizcon, Utilities, Inc. of Arlington, TX for the amount of$54,460 (see attached bid tabulation). The costs associated with this project are tabulated below: Engineering, Testing $ 5,500 Construction $54,460 Total $59,960 The total cost is $29,960 above the budgeted amount of$30,000. There are several reasons that attribute to this increase. Originally, this project was going to be designed in-house by City staff. Therefore, the CIP budget allocated $30,000 for the construction of this project, which did not account for any engineering costs. However due to the staff workload, a consultant completed the design of this project. Second, it was determined after estimating the project that more water line should be installed by bore rather than open cut to provide a cleaner job along the private properties. This additional amount of installation by bore increased the construction cost. Utilizing funds that exist from completed projects constructed under budget will fund the cost overrun. This project has been added to the attached CIP Project Cost Ledger. Citizen Input/ Board Review: None. Legal Review: Not applicable. Alternatives: None. Supporting Documents: Project Map Bid tabulation for Napa Valley/Woodland Heights water improvements CIP Project Cost Ledger Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council award the bid to Whizcon Utilities, Inc. for the installation of water improvements to serve Napa Valley Estates and Woodland Heights Addition in the amount of$54,460. Please place this item on the April 4, 2000 Regular City Council Agenda for review and yoz__ consideration. 114110 SEP/sep 10E-2 VDey • Heights : i/ae•r:Iproeme_nts : = - _- - -_-::: ia_. atrbj_ -- - - -- - - - -:: -- .�-. . . - , -ad . = := ®moll®®® ,� : = -"--..- .:- •_iiiiiiiiiii i. ii :-No Scale _ . 3_. . _. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. _ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .• -_• --13-- -g . . . . - ., . . -. - - - -- - - - - � -. .. , - .. - itiial T.:-:: "r n- ' .. ... g -: II -.. . . ..: ..:... _. Pr Ai_Ai:: I ,illilli 1111 ' - .. . .. . o =R1o • `r� N. ,a -® -::.:. .::.: .imit _ -: . .. • .. . • . . . : . . .. . _ . .. .. .. .. .. „pi ... . ....._. . • . . . . .. . ®ii1I - -Ili - . - i. .. .-. ..-- •- . . .. . �.. ._ 4PIP- . . %II. -.-. -. . . -. . . . .. . .. . .. , _. .- -. - - . - : 10E-3 - _- -. : :_ :__:: .:- : .:- -: - .:-:: -: -1 Napa Valley Estates/Camb Bid Openingh 23,lace Waterline20002:30p.m. -Bid Tabulation11111Bidder: Whizcon Utilities,Inc. Gra-Tex Utilities,Inc. H&W Utility Contr. Pam. Approx. . Extended Extended Extended Item Quantity Units Description of Bid Item Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount 1 1 LS Mobilization(Max 10%TEA) $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 4,300.00 $ 4,300.00 2 1 LS Landscape Repair/Replacement(incl. Sod) $ 1,944.00 $ 1,944.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,960.00 $ 3,960.00 3 610 LF 8" Class.150 SDR 18 PVC Waterline $ 18.00 $ 10,980.00 $ 41.00 $ 25,010.00 $ 55.00 $ 33,550.00 4 398 LF 8" Class 150 SDR 18 PVC Waterline by Directional Bore $ 62.00 $ 24,676.00 $ 96.00 $ - 38,208.00 $ 95.00 $ 37,810.00 5 1 Ea. 6" Gate Valve $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $ 650.00 $ 650.00 $ 490.00 $ 490.00 6 1 Ea. 8" Gate Valve $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 550.00 $ 550.00 7 1 Ea. 8"Tapping Sleeve and Valve $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 3,570.00 $ 3,570.00 8 0.5 Tn. Misc.DI Fittings $ 2,400.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 1,625.00 9 1 LS Stormwater Pollution Prevention $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 10 1 LS Project Signs(2)/Traffic Control $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 11 610 LF Trench Safety $ 1.00 $ 610.00 $ 0.75 $ 457.50 _ $ 0.10 $ 61.00 12 1 LS Discretionary allowance for unforeseen circumstances $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 8 Actual Amount Bid $ 54,460.00 $ 82,225.50 $ 94,916.00 m Written Amount Bid $54,470.00 $82,225.50 $94,916.00 41. Bid bond provided? Yes Yes Yes Power-of-Attorney? Yes Yes Yes Addenda attached? - N/A N/A N/A Bid Order . 1 2 3 Note: Italicized amounts are corrected napa-woodland bidtab.xls 3/30/00 VCIP PROJECT COSTS A B C D PROJECT DESCRIPTION111 BUDGETED AMOUNT BID/FINAL COST DIFFERENCE . RON ELEVATED TOWER** $1,860,000 $1,832,000 $28,000 3 20"WATERLINE ALONG FM 1709 $641,000 $638,408 $2,592 4 24"WATER LINE ALONG N.WHITE CHAPEL $850,000 $826,455 $23,545 5 BRUMLOW $112,700 $111,000 $1,700 6 BURNEY LN.-REHAB CUL-DE-SAC $57,000 $64,523 ($7,523) 7 BYRON NELSON STOP LIGHT $40,000 $65,000 ($25,000) 8 BYRON NELSON STRIPING $65,000 $65,637 ($637) 9 COMMERCE TRAFFIC LIGHT* $100,000 $48,405 $51,595 10 DIAMOND CIRCLE STREETS&SEWER $1,286,000 $990,161 $295,839 11 DOVE ACRES SEWER* $405,000 $205,474 $199,526 12 DOVE ESTATES LIFT STATION* $300,000 $167,473 $132,527 13 DOVE FORCE MAIN* $1,747,500 $2,113,218 ($365,718) 14 DOVE/HIGHLAND PAVING* $611,480 $778,533 ($167,053) 15 DOVE/SH 114 WATER LINE RELOCATION $339,200 $280,424 $58,776 16 FLORENCE TOWER TANK PAINTING $105,000 $152,200 ($47,200) 17 FM 1709 TRAFFIC SEQUENCING* $120,000 $42,000 $78,000 18 FM 1709 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONVERSIONS* $200,000 $123,399 $76,601 19 HARRELL DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION* $140,000 $175,464 ($35,464) 20 HILLWOOD SEWER* $95,000 $82,415 $12,586 21 HUNTWICK ESTATES SEWER $200,000 $276,123 ($76,123) 22 JELLICO SEWER* $500,000 $419,723 $80,277 23 KIRKWOOD WATER LINE $326,000 $266,159 $59,841 24 LAKE DRIVE WATER,SEWER,PAVING* $364,500 $376,991 ($12,491) 25 LILAC LN.WATER,SEWER,STREET* $234,600 $286,782 ($52,182) 26 LOVE HENRY COURT SEWER&STREET* $359,000 $401,474 ($42,474) 27 MISSION HILL SEWER $430,000 $489,099 ($59,099) lib8 N.WHITE CHAPEL-COUNTY LINE TO LAKE* $340,000 $470,970 ($130,970) 9 N.WHITE CHAPEL-DOVE TO COUNTY LINE* $181,850 $177,010 $4,840 0 N-3&N-4 LIFT STATIONS* _ $1,000,000 $1,009,500 ($9,500) 31 N-5 SEWER&KIMBALL/SH 114 WATER/SEWER RELOCATIONS* $762,500 $743,255 $19,245 32 NAPA VALLEEY/WOODLAND HEIGHTS WATER LINE* $30,000 $59,960 ($29,960) 33 PEARSON GROUND STORAGE TANK NO.2* $1,687,400 $1,545,247 $142,153 34 PINE SEWER* $200,000 $183,368 $16,632 35 PLANTATION SEWER $110,400 $84,676 $25,724 36 PUBLIC WORKS CENTER IMPROVEMENTS* $405,600 $472,580 ($66,980) 37 PUMP STATION NO.2* $3,110,000 $3,176,800 ($66,800) 38 RAINTREE/SHADY LN WATER,SEWER,PAVING $1,925,995 $1,615,029 $310,966 39 RIDGECREST* $355,576 $400,504 ($44,928) 40 SABRE SEWER CONNECTION-SOLANA $25,000 $21,700 $3,300 41 SHADY OAKS TRAFFIC LIGHT* $100,000 $91,000 $9,000 42 SOUTHLAKE/KELLER PUMP STATION MOD. $300,000 $116,281 $183,720 43 SUTTON PLACE DRAINGE&PAVING IMPROVEMENTS* $270,000 $311,865 ($41,865) 44 TIMARRON-BENT CREEK REPAIR* $726,986 $699,315 $27,671 45 TROPHY CLUB 24"WATER LINE* $1,511,000 $1,440,693 $70,307 46 W.CONTINENTAL RECON.-PHASE 1* $640,424 $731,161 ($90,737) 47 W.DOVE RECON.-PEYTONVILLE TO SHADY OAKS $259,680 $298,397 ($38,717) 48 W.JONES BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS* $1,000,000 $930,522 $69,478 49 WATER&SEWER TO MIRON ADDITION $196,781 $262,535 ($65,754) 50 TOTAL $26,628,172 $26,120,906 51 TOTAL(OVER)/UNDER BUDGET $507,266 52 53 `Project not yet complete. Cost shown reflects contract bid price&engineering,surveying costs 10E-5 3/30/00 MEDEZ, LTD. VOL. 12051, PG. 465 D. R. T. C. T. A-695 TRACT 3D3 WW HALL SURVEY 1050 E. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. LUD—MED. DENSITY ZONING — SF-1 S 88° 34' 52' E 104. 45' rr EXISTING e' SCREENING I I °lf. WALL I , �I I I I — M 00 N I I I 10' BUFFER YARD UTILITY EASEMENT II it W I� MEDEZ, LTD. VOL, 12051, PG, 465 o D. R, T. C. T. A-695 TRACT 3D3 (U WW HALL SURVEY o ,I 1050 E, SOUTHLAKE BLVD. LUD—MED. DENSITY z ZONING — SF-1 S 89, 30, 31, 121. 51, ---------------7EAS-T----S4 '1MIL� ' (F.M. 1709) (130' R. 0. W. ) J. P. & G. H. STRUNCK VOL. 6365, PG. 206 D. R. T. C. T. A-695 TR, 3D1 W. W. HALL SURVEY 200 N. CARROLL AVE. LUD—MED. DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING — AG A ZONED, AG LUD — MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL y EXISTING W SCREENING PROPOSED 8- SCREENING 5 5 WALL MALL 89e 42' 41'-_ E 555, 73' " W a251. ti 40- BL➢G. LINE— i/.. V 2& RFFER YARD _TYPE M =01 ° 36' 05' R=11524. 16' ------- CB=N 89' 41' 27' W LC=322. 08' 6 r• ;� LOT IR2R i — R 4 , I 86, 318 SF j 1. 982 AC, J PROPO I — I ^ a H OFFICES e e 8,700 of PARKING RE 't I _32 5 Is PARKING SH = 33 30' HLDG. -- Z XISTING S I I 7 t 9____ 1.1d!0' UTILIrr EASEMENT I 'dL 14 8�33RT._YEyI, H N 88° 53' 24' W / 97. 48' WESTERA SOUTHLAKE, L. P. ANITA PRADE VOL. 12615, PG. 339 VOL. 12615, PG. 339 D. R. T, C. T. D. R. T. C. T. A-899 TR. 4G A-899 TR. 4D2 O. KNIGHT SURVEY ❑, KNIGHT SURVEY 400 S. CARROLL AVE. 400 S. CARROLL AVE, 1 — MED. DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LUD — MED, DENSITY RESID IAIL11 I ZONING — AG ZONING — AG PROJECT EXISTING TRASH/➢UNPSTER P.4 FIRE LANE`> EXISTING OFFICES - - -- - - - -- - - - BO' BUFFER YARD - TYPE M ------------ PROPO OFFICE 10,300 SF PARKING I PARKING S z L � ijr6 s 4 _ -- ---- 50' HLDG, L. elbi �.O 10' UTII RT. IN/RA OUT ONLY N 88° 48' 42. 6: 1R13 — TYPE F1 . ZpIE 1 4rl , I I LOT 2 BLOCK 9 I Ai I MUNICIPAL FRANCHISE ILITY EMENT j ` SDUTHLA 'E{ T1J N C - R PROP ED W OFFIC S 9 000 SF P utuNG q' 2 P &UREMING 33 a C5 I I - I a i _ 1 , I 1 I IO' H FER YA Z - TYPE E STING To 30, UTILITY &97f 70 N 88° 54' 16' W ---74.70'------ PREENING �df RT. IN/RT. 011 r, A ONLY 1 , Qt7 2 I I MLNI IPAL UTILITY PO qED KS1olppjI 1,20 20 413 - I= 10' HU FER Y RD — I q, I F=. SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE PHASE I CAB. A, SLIDE 4892 P. R. T. C. T. COOPER & STEBBINS, L.P. 1256 MAIN ST, SUITE 240 34'27' LUD — MIXED USE .00, ZONED, NR—PUD&2 26' 08° 26' 57' E . 25' ALTERNATE B (F.M. 1709) C 130' R. 0. W. ) SOUTH CARROLL/1709 LTD, D. R. T. C. T. A-529 TR. 7A J. FREEMAN SURVEY NORTH CARROLL AVE, LUD — ❑FFICE COMMERCIAL FSTW000 �o� a� sh �FST ' A a 0 ch C) CRESTWOOD OFFICE PARK SITESOUTHLAKE BLVD. cE v S VICINITY MAP O� D 0 25 50 100 200 FEET SCALE: 1" = 50' ZUNINU - V- SITE DATA CHART EXISTING ZONING SP-2 FOR 11-1 USES PROPOSED ZONING SP-2 FOR 0-1 USES LAND USE DESIGNATION MEDIUM DENSITY RES. & MIXED USE GROSS ACREAGE 4.267 ACRES NET ACREAGE 3. 962 ACRES NET OF R. 0. W. DEDICATION NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS 1 PROPOSED BUILDING AREA ALTERNATE B = 17,700 SF ALTERNATE A = 14,700 SF NUMBER OF STORIES I MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35' FLOOR AREA BY USE ALTERNATE B - 17,700 SF OFFICE j ALTERNATE A - 10, 300 SF OFFICE & 4, 400 SF BANK PARKING REQUIRED ALTERNATE B = 64 SPACES- ALTERNATE A = 54 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED ALTERNATE B = 66 SPACES- ALTERNATE A = 57 SPACES IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE MAXIMUM (65'/.) ALTERNATE B & A = 55,970 SF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SHOWN ALTERNATE B = 54,080 SF (63%) ALTERNATE A = 55,780 SF (64%) OWNER: GREENWAY - CRESTWOOD PARK PARTNF GREENWAY - SOUTHLAKE OFFICE PAR' CONTACT- TOMMY PIGG 2301 CEDAR SPRINGS, SUITE 400 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 OFFICE- (214)880-9009 FAX: C 214) 880-0188 COOPER & STEBBINS, L. P. CONTACT, FRANK BLISS 1256 MAIN ST, SUITE 240 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 OFFICE- 817. 329. 8400 FAX, 917. 251. 8727 ENGINEER: GRAHAM ASSOCIATES, INC. DAVID SMITH 616 SIX FLAGS DRIVE, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS, 76011 OFFICE, (817)640-8535 FAX- (817)633-5240 LOT IR1 & LOT IR2R W. W. HALL NO. 695 ADDITION 4. 267 ACRES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ALTERNATE A CITY CASE NO: ZA 99-099 i:: 'f.•". '"'�'•:�{{. y .,"i.'T'{:', 'S5; £ :. ... .: v S .y. .;��;/• ... ..4.; ...-4r:. .. .vr •.Y •- :}}k :.4.{.s.�w .Q .1+....{�X4.v..,�n'•.�iu. .i �:.2�SSS�wKiN+t•.CA'h.�+Y. L.'wivNwf.�%..,�iXl.... 3,�ii'Awa..eZ�i'r<Z'Si15�%'SYr{>,Y�i.{i�t.�.3rr.I.G.....\s.�':1,1'S.G'w%'W''LS',S'a�{''.�'%{%ii Y�{YC•..,..w��i'!i.LS'XA-�4-.!{�SC•�fCIwY,�.2.w.v,�{(Ru'.�'Q�2-Sld"'.{ANSS�.S-:'.S�"w1�',.,,'i ;..4 �.;. ..{" }}X.{. ... . x�.1'�il'w.14i�1.'{.vi�n�iA�:':�,"W-DT'}v+�A�-:�:�n�Y4''.�'�:a\"M"ii':{M'Y+��tJ.6�]is1�LSYt,>.:N�,S'S'.'Ak"Syw`'+�.+�EA'.:�-J.l-' . v{il.:::i'r•v:i•i'iSti:l fi'h'::v. •;:'::i':: REVISED CONCEPT PLAN GOOD FULTON & FARRELL ARCHITECTS EAST SOUTHLAKE BLVD. SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS EL-_ ` 4 FEB B 2 3 2000 3,02 aat La.. A —us Site 2D0 FAX 2 Texas 75219 214 / 52H-5599 fAX 214 / 521-8872 Projeci No: 96117 Drawn By: . GSN ssae Dale: ➢9.22-ADD Revision Dates/By: File Name: .Sp-1 1 G.L. Barronin c. nc. 4200 West Vickery Suite 100 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Phone: (817) 738-6104 Fax: (817) 738-6135 2 PSTS .t,-) y ru s IV CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS SQUTHLAKE TEXAS Drawing Title: SITE PLAN Project No. Date: 9923 3/06/2000 Sheet No. MAR 0 6 2000 SLI ZAOO-004 _.,— ` \ � �r• •nr�nw rr �rnr ■r+rr rr�r SCALE: 6162" = I '-U" / \ / \ MEMBRANE STRUCTURE ( ABOVE ) / 33'-0* NORTH ELE ' SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" D 6 12 24 ATION IYi LIY IUi v1tYL Vii\VViViIL METAL ROOF WINDOWS NOTE: BUILDING FOOTPRINT INCLUDING ARC BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 20,1 E DECORATIVE STAIR STONE VENEER E.I.F.S. ARCADE (BEYOND) C 0 N G.L. Barron Construction, inc. 4200 West Vickery Suite 100 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Phone: (817) 738-6104 Fax: (817) 738-6135 CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Drawing Title: FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS Project No. 9923 I FfM MAR 0 6 2000 Date: 3/06/2000 MEMBRANE STRUCTURE i it III I � L-JIL-L-ii I ; I U11-0 w I I 741-91' GLASS WINDOW WALL STONE VENEER go,-O" SOUTH ELEVATION SCqE: 3/3211 — 1 1-011 0 6 12 24 ----------------- NOTE: BUILDING FOOTPRINT INCLUDING ARCADE = 16,278 S.F. BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 20,184 S.F. (AIR CONDITIONED) WINDOWS 11LE ROOF 9 00 --d- - I co P., DECORATIVE STAIR STONE VENEER E.I.F.S. ARCADE (BEYOND) c 0 0 N 4- G.L. Barron Construction, inc. 4200 West Vickery Suite 100 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Phone: (817) 738-6104 Fax: (817) 738-6135 la-Pyl US .......... CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS SOLITHLAKE TEXAS D D rGwi n rawing Title: FLOOR LOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS P L Project Projecct No. Date: 9923 3/06/2000 Sheet No. RECD MAR 0 0 2 SL3 AOO-0)04 JL J � 1 z .:; i I N yi . PROJECTION AT BUILDING "C" ONLY Ii I OF F ICEI I I .LLI m ® i i i 1 I-- — I-- z m ---- �- F"- r- .... i i I' m- - I � I I� c0 � E ■ J �ii 1 J U m o { I LU LU 1W zz LINE OF COVERED 'OFFICE a o o O = U 0 r, z " 6 t iV N 22'-11" 19'-4" FIRST FLOOR PLAN - B & C SCALE: 3/32"= I'4' TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION SCPlF. 31321= 1'-0" 47'-11" NOTE: BUILDING FOOTPRINT INCLUDING ARCADE = 6,014 S.F. BUILDING SQL ARE FOOTAGE = 4,122 S.F. (AIR CONDITIONED) SKYLIGHT TILE ROOF PROJECTION AT BUILDING "C" ONLY E.I.F.S. ARCADE (BEYOND) STONE VENEER TYPICAL COVE SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" TRANSLUCENT PANEL AT MIDDLE TO PROVIDE WEATHER PROTECTION 3 x WOOD MEMBERS AT 16" O.G. EXTEND ENDS OF WOOD STRUCTURE TO PROVIDE STRUCTURE FOR LANDSCAPING VINE WOOD COLUMNS COVERED WALKWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS. "B") RED WALKWAY G.L. Barron Construction, Inc. 4200 West Vickery Suite 100 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Phone: (817) 738-6104 Fax: (817) 738-6135 CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Drawing Title: FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS Project No. Date: 9923 3/06/2000 Sheet No. SL4 IBC[? MAR 0 6 20 m0- 0 -0 04 NO"rTl i'" , ! "l .. . / i t D........... f A yi . " PROJECTION AT j BUILDING "C" ONLY I I . :::OFFICb 1 I I ILU ® I t I I I z m - ---�- Q Z �,....,.. , t 0 ° m co I i.... _.... i..__._............. < Lf) cr) z I' LU I II a 0om o_� (DO L IOFFICEI WALKWAY �U>,O 0I r; z Zg I I I .. �..�.J e 6 t iV CV 22'-11" 19'-4" FIRST FLOOR PLAN - B & C SCALE: 3/32"= I'4' TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION SCPlF. 31321= 1'-0" 47'-11" NOTE: BUILDING FOOTPRINT INCLUDING ARCADE = 6,014 S.F. BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 4,122 S.F. (AIR CONDITIONED) SKYLIGHT TILE ROOF PROJECTION AT BLAMING "C" ONLY E.I.F.S. ARCADE (BEYOND) STONE VENEER TYPICAL COVE SCALE: 3132" = 1'-0" TRANSLUCENT PANEL AT MIDDLE TO PROVIDE WEATHER PROTECTION 3 x WOOD MEMBERS AT 16" O.G. EXTEND ENDS OF WOOD STRUCTURE TO PROVIDE STRUCTURE FOR LANDSCAPING VINE WOOD COLUMNS COVERED WALKWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS. 'B") RED WALKWAY G.L. Barron Construction, Inc. 4200 West Vickery Suite 100 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Phone: (817) 738-6104 Fax: (817) 738-6135 .,A CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Drawing Title: FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS Project No. Date: 9923 3/06/2000 Sheet No. SL4 RECT? MAR 0 6 20 m0- 0 -0 04 v)1 • rI OUT , ANS . "-1GN S SIG j ---— -- - — ----- -,__—_ —_ � PROPOSED- WALL IT- --__-_--_.��---• EXISTING FIRE LANE, ------- /.•- cCRTFRv�/-- ♦, W # I _._ ♦� LEGEND ® PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT MIS PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT L� PROPOSED STORM DRAIN HEADWALL ♦� �� — 924 — EXISTING CONTOUR ♦. \ -- 924 — PROPOSED CONTOUR ♦'. %/ x 563.21 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION �♦ ��1� x 563.00 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ♦� 2� MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION x 563.00 PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEV. � 0 #I �. .a v. _ .: __r,AN Moir* Now PE - __ 10IRF ) CONCRETE PARKING Q PP CHIAN LINK FENCE f a \VLINE CABINET ,�. - PRO.7E:,T TBM- BOX CUT IN TOP OF CURB ON THE JEAST SIDE OF THE ACCESS DRIVE AT ANGLE POINT 45' WEST OF THE WEST CURB OF INDUSTRIAL BLVD ELEVATION = C7':o65' a r N 'Y' INLET IA 0 10 20 30 45 60 90 SCALE IN FEET Ha1ff Associates, Inc ENGINEERS • SCIENTISTS s SURVEYORS PRELIMINARY - FOR INTERIM REVIEW ONLY These documents are for Interim Review and not intended for Construotion, SiddIM or Per Purposes. They were prepared Dy,or under the supervislon o4 JASON G. SWAIM 84832 MARCH 2O00 'TYPE OR PRINT NAME PE * Date PAVING AND GRADING PLAN G.L. BARRON - -ISIS PAPYRUS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS SHE SEE HalffAssociates, Inc. E1+IGINEERS . ARCHITECTS . SCIENTISTS . PLANNERS . SURVEYORS DESIGN 1, DRAWN DATE SCALE I AVO FILE I N0, JGS I JGS MARCH is : 30' 18422 1 1 G 1 MARoa, ,jgDIL aor,oasr,ra�,� os d� a3ava-,�.00�*e,io w�e�z,o+„uaoM„ rro sa oo,�iz ti r: I i Ei { ,zF � EXISIit FIRE LANE ---- - �' w,w,.wlw w. ��w rs rww.w�.pwww.rwr�w-r-�ww �.wl.��wr..�ww�.wrw,�rr w� w�wwwawwwsr wr.w w�wr—rwwaww— rra.r�, .�♦, .may '��/ K" ♦., .� • `\ 671 • �a G ( �. N i `� ` �♦ �� LEGEND \ ♦ \ PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINES 24 \♦' — - - — - - — - - -- EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 6GT2.5 �� �' \` �♦-nn'- - - - - - - EXISTING EASEMENT LINE x 672.3 �� \.. •. , x ' LID �; ♦. 1 FF = 73 � �: ♦, 6T2.5`� \ . Is`30 \ \x , to �i 14 ,* a lb • 672.5 672.8 : `FF = 672-80Nx 44 jolt �♦ � \ 67 ��.2 \� � --- .SS— x r' URE \ \ Nwt x �. ---------- _ _ — — _ _ — -c -- �- S --. _. a- -........ - ... ........... .... a. ............ _.............,.. .......... .. .. _ ! ',L ww. r r� •i �..iwwfw.w r rt w,Yw =.. • r �1 i.�l�.r; r r r R i �l yr .� j '�' �,. \ - •.. .! yew—wr•w—rw—ww—rw+,rwwww.rr�rlwr—ww�w.ww—ww w'•w �rwwiYwrw� „r `�i��f w�M1►+S ' - aft r—www�wrws wrw-ww—www�rwrs.rr;-ww . r 't r cri r E_ Apw LL i I, I`°C4y 669 CTI Toil 1",A EX T 4 M TO 0 .6TOf i � i 671.75 ra 15' C672.45 6T2.45 6T2.45 I ?7Gw95 6T2,45 `I 1 S � :GAO `•/...:'--', i � ._ ._.-._..._ I ;' -,7 HIM III I t_l LWFF -" 7....) IaLI 1 1 t -71 i D o f ; , r/ Ir L. ••, 672.9 U do --- ;� I ...... Z 672 5'I ss a i, / , F _I 21', / \ • I fi _,,' Imo. .-, , .t 1 67 I J q"" '' \ ttit 21 V : <a <o y \ V------------ t ` I ' oil fin I , i 1 I ss�o - 0) cis I ..-3 by ` I ,f I I —ss — i II I Lx671 RIDGE SSW HIM 6Ti,25 18AI I 5'CURB 1NL g5 — — I . I ; 10 -\ oil V to � � 1 >� 60 W 6 01 0 10 20 30 45 60 90 SCALE IN FEET Halff Associates, Inc. EMO EERS a SCIENTISTS a SURVEYORS PRELIMINARY - FOR INTERIM REVIEW ONLY These doouments are for Interim Review and not Intended for Construction, Bidding. or Permit Purpose& Theyy were prepared by, or under the supervision ofe JASON G. SWAIM 84832 MARCH 2O00 'TYPE OR PRINT NAME PE • Date nrfNw% RAA m mijU IVIHI( Mow r. a3dV6-aar\a031A\ioIau\LZIOA\xiaoM\\ W 6114M 00/9/r ... ....... 511 �7 ............................. ........... ........ .......... .... Qj EXI S TI IN G— FIRE LANE • A 369 67 67 A. V LEGEND 6@ W— PROPOSED WATER LINES Aj 41 AND FITTINGS x PROPOSED SANITARY —-1 —6@ SS--- %, *,., 0 � I- Al, 672. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS x 672.35 672.� 15 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE Nl� N, x 672.3 x ♦ "N TF 7 3 cj PROPOSAD SM" N 672.5 6' 6N-50 \,,X N GT2,4 672.1 'N I Ix 11% 67\58 ♦ IN14 WVSW BUILDNG IN -72 672.5 672.8 V, 'FF 672.80 T -6 (3 10 X 67 3 svp .4ssco ss- 67 T�, vx V 16' 7 F Fit V 672.1 0 x 1 T4 72 T x 67 99 671. 9 -9\ . . . . . . . 68 W X kpF 0 to 20 1 30 45 60 go SCALE IN FEET HaffAssociates, Inc. EW-4MEMS * SCemrs * suRvEyoRs PRELIMINARY - FOR INTERIM REVIEW ONLY Those documents are for Interim Review and not Intended for Construotion, SICIC11M or Permit Purposes. They were prepared by, or under the supervision of: JASON G. SWAIM 84832 MARCH 1999 'TYPE OR PRINT NAME PE * Date WATER AND SEWER PLAN G.L. BARRON — ISIS PAPYRUS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS nf--- I - imm Halff Associates, Inc. IME ,EwwwwmsARCHITECTS . SaEWSTS . PLANNERS . SURVEYORS ESIGN DRAWN. DATE I SCALE. AVO FILE I I - -140--. jGS jGS . MARC00H I p = 30' 18422 WS-1 — 1201 1 SQUTK *xf ILO E XCN�IieE el YD „4 MILL ST s� x APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION �v"e 11�q DATE• DATE: -- CHAIRMAN P&Z SECRETARY: APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL MAYOR: CITY SECRETARY: GENERALNOTES: 1. OWNERS Of CORNER LOTS SHALT. MAINTAIN SIGHT TRIANGLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY SUIlDIVISION ORDINANCE. 2. THIS PUT DOES 140T REMOVE ANY EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS OR COVENANTS; IF ANY, ON THE PROPERTY. 3. BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE. RE- CORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2242. P.R.T.C.T. 4. SELLING A PORTION OF ANY LOT WITHIN THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF STATE LAW AND CITY ORDINANCES AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHOLDING Of UTILITIES AND BUILDING PERMITS. ,p• \ SCALE 1!' ' �{r� $ N' ipp• 150' VICINITY MAP \a 1 mmmmld PW \ ` TNS IS To CUM"CUM"THAT i. JACMC Y. CRA1NFCtRO, a Regietsrred Profaaiond Land Survyoreof the Stars of Texas, have Platted the below � \ � K su°Aiw a � n ground, anddOwtgr ON lot ccomws, angle P and points of am property marked on the LOT 5, BLOC A d Woot this plat convc* WOUN SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE r rlS \ .; OF \ VOLUME 388-176, PAGE 9 _ / !'� G� T�'-} 1\ M. c R.P.L.Sy t LOT 4R--1 R cA' E BLOCK A \ P.R.T:C.T. `� ` • �` �� � 4�4`7U► ' . Shots of Texas Na. 4059 SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE \ - 1 JACK M. CT+AWfORO���;" " I I L0� 4R--�R-1 1 CABINET A. SUDS 1001 \ \ ,/�" = ' 1 I BLOCK A P.R.T.C.T.R�Q4059��w UTH I��E \ a .� O BLANK PLACE \ . CABINET A. 4 t� SLIDE PR.T.C..X. T \ 1. om , - ;��v ;P I I I Roo \ , i :`vft I 1 mac,' LOT 4R-2R-2 I 1 i BLOCK A t 1 ' SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE do--, CE ,� � ���' �� °� 'y � �► I I CABINET A. SLIDE 2242 P.R.T.C.T. • / 4% \ ` cb- 1/2- Ivan SEA. WW42 N�' su { IL+AV2242 " ,3v r10E CowroM E�ErENT « nRE LAW �•�*�i !i� `�l � }\ �. O,� '� $ � • VOLUW 13272. PAK 456. O.R.T.C.T. t�f 2" � 'R/ (` i �j'0 li li)► \ FOUND v. iV OT 271.94:4'3'ItO�, ,� �► 1t Se �2' ++0 1 , r �V 13 Q' WIDE COMMON J�GC£35 MeowT3.40' 00 T - 11.Ai" 0 . 79'41' 11 " • \ / \ d ROD I/MiOV " i t j =1 r�- 1 ss• \ T . 25.03 ` 30.09* •�© 4'¢A \ ! 0 . Z jj z ., \ tie t3� / 7}�\ 1 /r � ` m \ tiles •0 /\ m 14 I \ o t,\ y a \ \ \ V 06 XFX LLJ tY \ N , 0 BLOCK A r i I r 1 ROD C11 6. n ti�\ e K A , .01 , LOT 10 ix , ;!l 14.892 ACRES\ OWNED/DEVELOPER: BRITrAIN & CRAWFORD LOTS 6 R , 7 , 8 & 9 LAND SURVEYING & GATEWAY PROPERTIES JOINT VENTURE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING 930 PARKVIEW LANE (617) 926-02 + 1 -- METRO (817) 429-51 12 SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS 76092 Fax No. (817) 926-9347 TERRY WILKINSON P.O. BOX 11374 is 3906 SOUTH FREEWAY (817) 329-4599 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 761 10 OWNER/DEVELOPER: LOT 10 OSIRIS PROPERTIES, INC. 5505 NORMANDY DR. COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHMW.AS. C„ATEIMAY PROPERTIES JOINT VENTURE and OSIRIS PROPERTIES. INC.. octiM by and through the ue ►ed. their d�� fit& are the sale owners of a 10.756 am lr+oot of Tared situated in the THOMA.S EAffr1 R . Aeatrae No. 474. and the HIM A- FOSM 9URIREY. Abetrelct No. 518E in tMre City of So lMlleke. Tarrant County. TatcW ooaording to the deeds reoerded in Volume 13011. Pogo 100 and VoWa a 13M. Pogo 25 of the Deed Revorde of T*Rwd County. cocas, and of Lot 4R-2R-3. Black A. 9©EITNLIMtE lMNK PtJKEo an addition to the CNY of SoutOoke, 000ording to the Plot recorded in Caak* A. 2242 of the Plat Records of Tarrant CoA*. TO"". and all of LA 6. BlO.k A. S�furHfAM SANK RME, on addk� to the City of .Scut "Iw ocooediN t+e the Pad Boo rd.e In Vonore. 366 iya Page 9 of the Plat It+ ow& of Taunt County. Texas. and being mare partieulorly described by metes and bounds ae follo m LEGAL DESCRIPTION BE)NG 10.756 acres of land situated In the Ti'O" EASTER SURVEY. Abetract No. 474.. and HERS OF A. FOSTER SU11W. Ab~ ft. 510, Tarrant Cou*. Terse and being aft of tat 4R-2R-3. aodc A. SOUn*AKE BANK PLACE an addkim to the City of Soudooks, ocaorto he E.vied plat r+scordW In Cabinet A. VAP 2242 of the Plot Rseor+0 of Tarrant Country. Teems and ale of Loot 6. Block A. SOUTHIJKE addition to the Char of SwtddiW according to the Pict r*aorsied in Volume 300-176. Pop 9 Of the Plot fiesarM of Twrant Co ntjh Tie. Sold 10.rie act+se of land being nnor+e particularly described by metss and baande as f000vm I 14 at a 1 sf mod set. � BMNE� "of -way line of State Highway No. 114. said point � the Southeast corns► of maki Lot THENCE s 89' 40' 3V' W =46 feet, to a 1 /2" iron rod found, for o corner: corner at the Northeast Carrw of s fTa9' Park. according w � � r.�eo1 in iron rod 3ae 1 i 1. Por op T W, a, OMM lr,dretriof Park aocordirrq THENCE S W 44' 40" W 432AW het. Sea Wnulnq along ft North sins of the afadeoid tart 6, Mock 1 GnIndudrlol Panic to a 1" iron rod found. at the Northwest owIm Iltwooit. said point ales or b*4the Northeast oarner of Loot 3, Sock A. =ffi4L 1KE BANK PLACE to the pint retarded le V.eoiurIn 361s-176. Page 9 of the plat Reds of Tarrant County. Texas; accordingTHENCE S W 58' 51" W 161.71 lost. to a 5/8" Iran rod found, at the Southwest darner of the aforesaid Lot 40-2R-3 and lying in the East right-of-way Tine of !knit Street (a 50 foot right-of-way): THENCE N 00' 05' 22" € 467.05 het. a� *VA-d-way line of said Bank Street to a 1 /2" iron rod found, at the Northwest corner of Lot 4R--2R-3, Block A of eoid "NK f : THENCE Along the North line of the oforeeoW Lot 4R-2R-3 as follows: 1. EAST 271.04 feet to a 1 /2" iron rod found, for a writer Lot 2. N 460 32` 47" E 146.27 feet. to 0 1 /2" irnn rod found. for a corner. said po* lying at the most South.nb souithweet canner of S. Block A. SOUTI4AM BANK PLACE accordkrg to the plat recorded in Volume 3110-176, Pogo 4 of the Pat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; � aforesaid Southwest right•ray linef State 219. o�ySoutheast ��y No. 114; 4Of the aforesaid Lot 3, Block A to o 1 /2" iron rod set. for a corner in the THENM Akxg the Southwest right -of -ray lens of said State Highway No. 114 ae follows: 1. S 330 O8' 24" E 549.42 feet to a Texas H691WFoy Deportment Monument found. at the bsom*-q of a curve to the left; 2. SOLF�FiEAS"Ti:RLY �,34 feet. along said curve to the Mott having oNNrGrodius of 2799.10 feet a aerated angle of OK' 00' "r' orcd a chord bearing S 36' 09' 40" E 293.20 feet to THE PLACE OF BE , and containing 10.758 aer+M (468,649 squat het) of hand. NOW. TI*REFORE. KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS. THAT, GATENOAY PROPERM JONr VENTURE and OSM PROPERTIES. INC.. do fly odop't this plat the lmsirlat ore described property as LOTS OR. 7. 8. 9. & 10, BLOCK A. SOUT14AKE OANK PLACE, an addition to the City of South! " County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate to the publfe a use, the rights of -way and eaeerfwft shaven owr'scn• This plat dose not after or rwnore swishing deed restrictions or covenonb. if any. on this property. WITNESS OUR Flll+l[iS at Sa�crthfaks, Tarrant County, Texas. This the ___s_.--_ day of �„ -- 194Q -Z wILKM'. H. VENTURE VENTURE PAMWEit PROPfRI1fS, INC. PROPERTIES JOINT STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE NE, the undersigned. a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day per!ontaly MR" �' VEMTURE PARTNER. GAI MlAd�Y�PERTiESNo JONfi VENTURE. known tom tom err ix s and In the capacity subscribed �ftow statenetrdwrrs+ct and to me that he executed the same for the purpoees and as the oat and deed of said G*AWW PMWtW* Joint Ventura. GNEN UirDER Ile HANb .AND SM OF OFFICE. this the � day of . � , \ �#�_ The 3'tat. of T: nfo _j , (2139111 SQUARE FEET) �\ 6��, hZt i o i'' Z CaRrr� 6e. Tdiiblr! %vz9- AWC . � Commisefon Expires: �� Q_ STATE Of pus w� \ * A� G COt1NTY OF TARRJViT appeared JEROME L. PRAGER. a I . _ \ 4�tij t U I / s 1 �G� \ ' _ , .. BEFORE ME. Ns a Notary Public In and for said County and State. an � is day p lh oPPsc �strun+ent and ao� a a. 'LOT ` 4 R 2 R -- 3 . \ O �' ti .yg6' Q♦` 06° 00 18 wa` PRfsIDEMT, 05Mas ��to - , if+e some for t)ri 01 to e. the e to the foregoing Y r- 4� '� yp to me that he wwutsdAna in the capacity thsn.ir, stated, and as the act z CO1Di _ , \ \ 4� • "�R. . \ R - 2799.10 and deed of sold OSirfe Prcpert#es, Inc. / QQ �" I ci ` �,�,\ '� +�� t+ } ` L = 293.34' GlYEN UNDER MY HAND NO SEAL OF OFFICE. this. the __I_1�__- day of 5 �• w� 199a. vo J OD a, i n� l d `� cr /IORD - S 38° 09e 49r• E \ 293.20' Ths mate of Texas for i G } \ My Comrnls ion Expires: ' ' 'Crept, i Cm� � \ \ PLAT REVISION ' \sue. / LOT sR t LOTS f R, 7, 8, 9 & 109 BLOCK A ! ! \ \ \ 1.15P6 ACRES o ,,a SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE. \ ARE FEET T 6 BLOCK A \' 0 I o (72,58 S�1 LO;,, \ i ` AN ADDITION TO THE � � / . �• ROD sir X = g+ `c \ OF SO T *�►,\ �'a \ CITY , COUNTY, TEXAS . � BEING 10.7ASACRES OF LAND ED N THE , I 30• 8 A GsuOe u1rE NiT 2242 P ItT.0 T. w" "� -- 30' FADING sEre�sx Lr+E- ROD gr \ ABSTRACT N0, 474 400 FOUND ry THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, 1 S' T.P h L. EJ1SEwAEN s � . 720. , PAGE "19'W. O.R.T.C.T. ----may �� SOt1iHLAKE \ CITE IT LINE AND THE 1a' UrRirY fAtEMDrr , ; " �� ww.i.�•! .i JOTY OF SOOT► LAKE 1 O ulrrrn EA3E +r ,M��.' .crEVirIE HEIRS OF A. FOSTER SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 518 - - - - - -- vaurwE 3M-t78. PM 9: J I" „ON roc FOUNo to' ut+ Ty E4seieg VOLUME 3W-179 PME 9 P.R.T.c.T.,. --. -- 133.43' CITY of cRAP� 389°40'38 '11 522.68, AND BEING A REVISION �' ° s S °29'08#rW P.R�..L _ r. .� POINT (?F r o r _ �51. '� ,,, S80°44'40'tW 432.89' r o F«kw ter woe .-� LOT 4R-2R-3, BLOCK A, SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE Roo o �,- ,As-,,� PL _ Roo SET TR-IAL�� BEGINNING \ ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2242 �� __ �1 AND LOT fi, BLOCK A, SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE oia� s <� ;a - LOT 8, BLOCK 1 ` (60' PUBLIC RIGHT -OF --WAY} - - -\ I > BLOCK A i 0 a _ _ \ ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 3$$-176, PAGE 9 LOT 3. GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTHLAKE BAPLACE Io �;� VOLUME 388-111. PAGE 2 3� _ -- _ �..___ ..___ _ _ -_-- - _ -- OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS NK VOLUME 388-176. PAGE 9 ' a• "1 ` x P.R.T.C.T. P.RiT.C.T. \ � MAY, 1898 % 5 'LOTS S''tb DATE Oc>h�is� s THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET _ _. _, SLIDE s"r 1 0� 2 cITY CASE No. zA sal -ass (Cis) ens\srvr ft\2x1vWt SIN. nN. 45" HLLU IYtr1r1 v U )000 . Ell, 1/8°=1 I<_0 A R C H I I I C I U H 7001 PRESMN ROAD SUITE 210, L312 DAIIAS, TIMS 75205-1156 TEL 214.522.8494 FAX 214.522.M7 WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE. COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: BROCKETTE DAVIS DRAKE, INC. Tel 214.824.3647 Fax 214.824.2586 M/E/P ENGINEER: BLEP ENGINEERS, INC. Tel 214.824.5559 Fax 214.824.5848 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: HCB CONTRACTORS Tel 214.965.1226 Fax 214.965.1363 10A DEVELOPER: COOPER B STEBBINS 1721 East Southlake Blvd. Suite 100 Southlake, TX 76092 Tel 817.329.8400 Fax 817.251.8717 CIVIL ENGINEER: WALTER P. MOORE & ASSOCIATES Tel 713.630.7300 Fax 713.630.7394 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: LEE ENGINEERING, INC. Tel 972.248.3006 Fax 972.248.3855 KEY PLAN SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE BLOCK 10 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS FLOOR PLAN BLOCK 10 PACKAGE 011 FLOORPLAN REC'D MAR 0 12000 97074.08 2 OF 3 JOB N0. SHEET