Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1998-07-21 CC Packet
City of Southlake,Texas i MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting July 21, 1998 Note that the financial report prepared by Finance Director Lou Ann Heath and the Town Square Status Report prepared by Deputy Director of Public Works Ron Harper are included in your packet under Item No. 4B-1-4 and 4B-5, respectively. If you have any questions, call Lou Ann Heath, Ron Harper, or me. The quarterly investment reports will be provided to you at the meeting on Tuesday. 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Resolution No. 98-52, Revisions to Resolution No. 97-75, Authorizing the Mayor to execute the D.A.R.E. Grant, 2nd year funding. As explained in the memo from Malcolm Jackson, this is essentially a clean-up item. We need to adopt this resolution to insert language that will assure the grant review panel that the City would be willing to refund grant funds if there were to be problems. The resolution in your packet is "underlined" to show the new language. Please let Malcolm or Chief Campbell know if you have any questions. 2. Agenda Item No. 5B. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a lease agreement with Carroll Independent School District for space within Town Hall. This agreement is substantially in accordance with the draft presented at the last Council meeting. The only significant change pertains to recovering costs if CISD were to vacate the premises, and this is addressed in Section 10.02 C. There are some other minor changes, which are outlined in the memo from Darcey Imm. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 2 The draft presented at the last Council meeting was forwarded to Ted Gillum on July 8. I spoke to him briefly last week regarding the City Council's position on the Town Hall and the stadium issue. He indicated that their attorney was reviewing the document. He has been out of town, and therefore I have not received any feedback on CISD's position regarding these two issues. Attached hereto is a copy of the follow-up letter to Dr. Gillum on July 10. Please contact me if you have questions regarding this item. 3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a commercial developer agreement for Creekside Office Joint Venture. There are no unusual items with this developer agreement. As noted in the memo from Charlie Thomas, the Park Board approved the developer's request to pay fees in the amount of $1,570 in lieu of park land dedication. Please contact Charlie Thomas if you have questions regarding this item. 4. Agenda Item No. 5D. Authorization to advertise for bids for the installation of a 24- inch sanitary sewer line along Kirkwood Boulevard from Dove Street to Kirkwood Hollow. This project is part of the proposed force main, approved by City Council previously, to be built along Dove St. and to connect to the existing line in the Kirkwood Hollow Addition that extends to the TRA lift station on N. White Chapel. The proposed force main will empty into this 24-inch gravity line, which is proposed to extend along a portion of Dove St. to Kirkwood Blvd. The Dove Street force main project will move forward, once the remaining easements are obtained. It is prudent to build this line prior to the completion of Kirkwood Blvd. to avoid any conflict that may arise once the pavement is in place. As described in the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 3 memo from Bob Whitehead, $1,119,800 in the CIP budget has been allocated for the Dove St. force main project, with the Kirkwood gravity portion estimated to cost $197,591. FYI, we will update you on our efforts to acquire easements during executive session on Tuesday evening. Please contact Bob Whitehead if you have questions regarding this item. 5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Authorize the City Manager to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Fort Worth for cooperative purchasing. The memo from Lou Ann Heath succinctly describes the need for this agreement. Although the immediate issue is fuel for our fleet, there may well be other areas where the agreement can be useful. L You will recall that we currently utilize several cooperative-purchasing opportunities, including Tarrant County, the State of Texas, and the Houston- Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC). As pointed out in Lou Ann's memo, these types of cooperative agreements have advantages of volume pricing, and also save staff time and the expense of advertising for bids. Feel free to contact Lou Ann or me if you have any questions concerning this item. 6. Agenda Item No. 5F. Approve list of training providers as required by the Public Funds Investment Act. The memo from Finance Director Lou Ann Heath details the necessity for your approval of this list of training providers. Briefly, state statute requires not less than 10 hours of training every two years for those responsible for the financial stability of the municipality. These training providers L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 4 must be independent providers and approved by the governing body of the local government. Director Heath has recommended four organizations to provide such training. Although the University of North Texas Center for Public Management has been the primary source for this training in the past, the other alternates will allow greater flexibility and choice when seeking this continuing education in the future. Please contact Lou Ann Heath if you have questions regarding this item. 7. Agenda Item No. 5G. ZA 98-063, Plat Vacation of Lot 1, Beedy No. 72 Addition. The purpose of this request is to remove lot boundaries, easements and any deed restrictions or covenants established by the existing plat, in order to file the (kr approved Final Plat for Laurelwood Park Addition (formerly submitted as Pinecastle Pointe, Longwood Addition and Coventry Park). There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions. 8. Agenda Item No. 5H. ZA 98-064, Plat Vacation of Lots 2 & 3 T. Beedy No. 72 Addition. As with the previous item, the purpose of this request is to remove lot boundaries, easements and any deed restrictions or covenants established by the existing plat in order to file the approved Final Plat for Laurelwood Park Addition (formerly submitted as Pinecastle Pointe, Longwood Addition and Coventry Park). There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions. 9. Agenda Item No. 5I. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Lewis McLain for the development of a Stormwater Drainage Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Li Page 5 Utility System (SDUS). Your approval of this item will begin the process of developing a drainage utility district, which will provide funding for drainage- related initiatives for the City of Southlake. We have discussed the idea of a stormwater drainage utility district with each City Council over the last five years. (As pointed out in the memo from Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead, most recently this was discussed briefly at the City Council retreat in June.) We have been working on our Master Drainage Plan for several years, and it is our intent to have the plan completed in approximately two more years. We have 10-12 watersheds in Southlake that need to be addressed, and these will cost approximately $50k each to plan. However, there will be two that will be coming forth for construction improvements during that time (first the Jones Branch, then Dove Creek) which will entail large construction costs. We have long looked at the utility district as an equitable alternate funding source for major drainage improvements. This item is the first step. Mr. McLain's proposal is comprehensive, taking us completely through the process. As we discussed at the June Retreat, Mr. McLain has vast experience with these types of projects. Also, he has considerable experience with our operations (water and sewer rate studies, impact fee studies, and multi-year financial plan). Staff recommends your approval of this agreement. Questions about this item should be directed to Public Works Director Bob Whitehead. 10. Agenda Item No. 5J. Ordinance No. 646-A, 1st reading, Amending Ordinance No. 646, Parks and Recreation Board, relating to the appointments of the Youth Park Board. These amendments pertain to the appointments to the Youth Parks and Recreation Board. Section 8 of the ordinance already prescribes the duties of the • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 6 Youth Park Board as advisory to the Parks and Recreation Board. Sections 6 and 7 are revised to provide for appointment/removal of the Youth Park Board members by the Park and Recreation Board, rather than by the City Council. Note sections 6 and 7 of the ordinance are the only sections in which modifications were made. The Park Board unanimously approved these amendments at their July 13 meeting. Please contact Shelli Siemer if you have any questions regarding the amendments. 11. Agenda Item No. 5K. Authorizing the Mayor to enter into a five year, October 1998-September 2003, contract for technical services and fee schedule with Trinity River Authority (TRA) for Central Regional Wastewater System. This contract with the TRA provides for inspection, sampling, and analytical services for any industrial discharges into the City's sanitary sewer system. The City is required to (161,, test samples of industrial discharges to ensure that harmful substances are not being sent into the sewer system. Currently there are no industrial discharges into the TRA system. Note, however, that a company has the right to apply to discharge their wastes at any time. With this contract, the City will be prepared to have the discharges tested should a company apply to do so. Note we are requesting City Council authorize a five year agreement, rather than the one year agreement we have had for each of the previous years we have been on TRA sewer. We believe this is in our best interest since the TRA is responsible for maintaining the quality of the effluent in its system. Although the fee schedule for the services is set on an annual basis, we are protected during the term of the agreement under section II B, which has a thirty (30) day notice termination clause. Also, any fees we are assessed by TRA for Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 7 these services will be passed on to the customer requesting the discharge. Questions about this item should be directed to Bob Whitehead 12.Agenda Item No. 5L. Approve Change Order #2 for Ratliff Iron Works to extend the pipe rail fence at Bob Jones Park. The SPDC will consider this item at its meeting on Monday, July 20. Staff is proposing the construction of the additional fencing because we have the ability to move forward with the fence construction at this time, although we had not anticipated that this would be the case. (When we bid the fence, park plans were not far enough along to feel comfortable proceeding with the additional fencing.) The contractor has agreed to extend the same unit price for the additional fencing as his original bid for the fencing, which has been installed. Please let Ben Henry know if you have any questions regarding this item. 13. Agenda Item No. 5M. Approve Change Order #1 for Pittman Construction to modify drainage improvements at Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase II. This item will also be considered by SPDC on Monday. As described in the memo from Ben Henry, this item relates to the drainage system changes discussed when SPDC/Council awarded the bid to Pittman Construction. At that time, Ben was working through modifications to the drainage system with Mesa and it appeared that we could save project dollars by implementing the changes. This change order is the result of his analysis with Mesa. As he describes, we will be able to save almost $20,000 in drainage system materials with the modifications. Also, we will not be required to haul dirt from Bob Jones Park as originally planned ($40,000 cost), since we will be digging out a pond on the Brunson property. The new configuration will require us to perform Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 8 more excavation at Bicentennial Park (at a cost of $14,250), however, our overall savings to the original bid with this change is $45,127. Please contact Ben Henry if you have specific questions. 14. Agenda Item No. 5N. Approve Change Order #2 for Pittman Construction for concrete material cost. As you know, we awarded this bid to Pittman Construction in April but have taken time to essentially redesign the drainage scheme for the project as discussed previously. This, along with property acquisition issues, has kept us from issuing Pittman's "notice to proceed." During this time, concrete prices have escalated and the contractor has requested that SPDC consider this change order so that he can recover his material costs for this project. He is requesting an additional $12,000 for materials. Staff is researching whether or not there are any viable alternatives in the construction. Staff believes the request is (re reasonable and appropriate given the delays, if there are no alternatives. Again, SPDC will consider the item at their Monday meeting. Please call Ben Henry with questions about this item. 15. Agenda Item No. 50. Authorization to advertise for bids for water well drilling at Bob Jones Park. The memo from Ben Henry and attached correspondence from Cheatham and Associates describe the situation. Your approval of this item will allow us to proceed with bids, which you will then award at a future meeting. Questions about water wells at Bob Jones Park should be directed to Ben Henry. Note that SPDC will also act on this item at their Monday, July 20 meeting. FYI, other SPDC action on Monday will include approving designs for the tennis pro shop and the materials palette for Bicentennial Park, authorization to proceed with bidding the remaining bid packages for Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase II, Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 9 and approving the materials palette for the pavilion at Bob Jones Park. The group will also discuss the land acquisition plan for parks and a five-year capital improvement program. This last item will be brought to City Council in a subsequent meeting. Questions about SPDC may be directed to Shana Yelverton or Ben Henry. 16. Agenda Item No. 5P. Sign Ordinance Appeal for Woodland Heights Addition, 1721-1725 East Southlake Boulevard. This item was tabled time certain to July 21 last meeting. Since staff has not received a revised application, this item has been placed on the consent agenda for tabling to August 4. 17. Agenda Item No. 7A. Resolution No. 98-49, (ZA 98-043), Specific Use Permit for outside storage of plants or other greenery for Wal-Mart. Recall this item has been tabled each of the last several meetings in order to give Wal-Mart and staff time to work out an approach acceptable for both the applicant and City for resolving the issues. In speaking with Aaron Carter, Wal-Mart Southlake Store Manager, Wal- Mart does not believe a solution can be reached quickly, and is withdrawing the application before you. We should receive a letter before Tuesday to that effect. Wal-Mart would like to continue to work with the City to find a way to resolve the outside storage for seasonal sites to include the ability to park storage containers during the Thanksgiving-Christmas season. We have also been in contact with Home Depot concerning outside storage problems. We would like to continue with a workgroup including City Council and staff, plus representatives of Wal-Mart and Home Depot, to see what should be, or can be, addressed, if anything. Both Wal- Mart and Home Depot have expressed a willingness to work with us. We would like your feedback on this issue. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 LPage 10 As a reminder on this issue, recall that this Wal-Mart application requested to exceed the permitted area of outdoor sales permitted in Section 38.3(a) of the ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial 6-0 recommending that the applicant "clean up" the site and return with the request. FYI, Mr. Carter indicated that they will be replacing the dead trees and shrubs, and that they are going to address the situation with the existing problems immediately. Code Enforcement will be working with them in order to point out the problems, and comment on their recommended solution. Contact me if you have questions concerning this item. 18. Agenda Item No. 7B. ZA 98-054, Site Plan for Southlake Crossing Animal Clinic. There are no unresolved issues with this application. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 subject to the Site Plan Review Summary. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 19. Agenda Item No. 7C. Ordinance No. 480-CC, 2nd reading, Residential Adjacency Standards and Corridor Overlay Zone Revisions. On July 7, 1998, the City Council approved Draft 6 of this ordinance on consent (7-0) on 1st Reading. Draft 7, which is in your packet, reflects P & Z's recommendations that a pitched roof be placed on all buildings having a footprint of 6,000 s.f. or less of floor area. rather than a total floor area of 6,000 s.f. They further recommended that the regulations set forth in this amendment affect only those projects submitted after the effective date of this ordinance. Included also are the changes recommended by the City Attorney's office. As discussed during the work session of your last meeting, those changes are minor in nature, being more formatting changes rather than substantive changes. See Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy's memorandum for a Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 11 section-by-section review of Draft 7. For questions related to Ordinance 480-CC, please call Karen. 20. Agenda Item No. 7D. Ordinance No. 480-283, 2nd Reading, Rezoning and Concept Plan - The Trailhead. This development proposes a change from "AG" to "SF-20A" zoning with 27 residential lots and one common area . There are some items in the Staff Review which the applicant has requested relief from regarding lot widths measured at the building line, street stub requirements and cul-de-sac lengths. The commission recommended approval (7-0) on July 18, 1998 deferring action on these items until preliminary platting and the City Council approved the first reading (7-0) subject to granting the requested relief as noted in the Staff Report and adding that no building pad is to be allowed within 20' of the floodplain. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 21. Agenda Item No. 7E. Ordinance No. 480-284, 2nd Reading, Zoning Change, "AG" to "SF-lA", Tract 1D, Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 299. This is a 2.477-acre tract for which the owner is proposing a single lot for a residential home. There are no unresolved issues related to this item. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved this request (7-0) on July 18, 1998 and the City Council approved first reading (7-0) on consent July 7, 1998. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 22. Agenda Item No. 7F. Ordinance 480-281, 2nd Reading (ZA 98-045), Rezoning and Concept Plan for The Woods. There have been no changes in this application since Council's approval of the first reading 4-2. On July 16, 1998 the City Council approved (5-2) to table the second reading of this item until the July 21, L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 12 1998 City Council meeting. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 23. Agenda Item No. 7G. ZA 97-085, Site Plan for Solana Park Circle. This site plan proposes two five story buildings and one four story building containing a total of 514,338 square feet and a four level parking garage within "Parcel B" of the Solana development. There are no significant issues regarding this item. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) on July 9, 1998. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 24. Agenda Item No. 7H. ZA 98-066, Site Plan for Lots 1R and 2R, Block B Southlake Bank Place. This plan proposes adding pavement for parking to an existing warehouse/office facility located at the southwest corner of Bank Street and F.M. 1709. No new buildings or curb cuts onto public rights-of-way are proposed with this plan. The reason this site plan has been brought forward is due to the property lying within the Corridor Overlay Zone. The only issues regarding this plan appear to be driveway spacing and stacking depth on the existing driveways. Because the number of parking spaces being added will increase the impact on the existing driveways by 20% or more, the existing driveways are required to be in compliance with Driveway Ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission made a motion to approve this plan on July 9, 1998 subject to granting relief on driveway spacing and requiring that the applicant provide as much stacking as possible on the driveways intersecting F.M. 1709. The motion did not carry due to a 3-3 vote by the Commission with Chairman Creighton, Commissioners Shankland and Peebles dissenting. The Planning and Zoning Commission forwarded this item to the City Council with no recommendation. The plan reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission had stacking depths of approximately 8' for the driveways intersecting F.M. 1709. The stacking depth for these driveways has been increased to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 13 approximately 35' on the new plan submitted which will be reviewed by the City Council. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 25. Agenda Item No. 7I. Resolution No. 98-53, (ZA 98-067), Specific Use Permit for the sale of Alcoholic Beverages for On-Premises Consumption at Me-N-Ed's Pizza, Lot 3, Block 1, Village Center, Phase I, 2120 E. Southlake Blvd. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) on July 9, 1998, stipulating the SUP be in affect only while Me-N-Ed's Pizza exists within the premises. There is no Staff Review for this item due to the fact that no changes are being proposed to the previously approved Concept and Site Plans for this development. A location map for the site is attached to the Staff Report. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 26. Agenda Item No. 8A. Ordinance No. 480-285, 1st Reading, (ZA 98-068), Rezoning of a 2.842 acre portion of Lot 1 Rougemont. This request proposes a zoning change from "RE" to "SF-1A"on a portion of an approximately 14.5 acre lot. This property is located just north of the recently approved subdivision to be known as Laurelwood Park Addition (formerly submitted as Pinecastle Pointe, Longwood Addition and Coventry Park). The applicant is rezoning this in order to subdivide a single lot located in the rear of the site. The request following this item is the related Plat Revision. The proposed lot in the rear of the site does not have the street frontage required by the subdivision regulations. There was a great deal of discussion regarding street stubs into this property during the approval of the plat for Laurelwood Park Addition. A 26' common access easement stubbing into the south line of this site was approved in lieu of the street stub with the approval of Laurelwood Park. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 14 this item (6-0) on July 9, 1998. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. (Note: If your questions on this request can be satisfactorily answered following the work session, this item would appear to be a appropriate for placement on the consent agenda.) 27. Agenda Item No. 8B. ZA 98-069, Plat Revision for proposed Lots 1R and 2, Rougemont. The previous item describes the issues related to this case. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) granting relief to the required street frontage for the rear lot and the required extension of Brittany Lane to the north, which is a dedicated right-of-way with no constructed street. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. (Note: As with the above item, this would also appear to be a appropriate for placement on the consent agenda, subject to the Plat Review Summary in accordance with the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, if your questions have been satisfactorily addressed at the work session.) 28. Agenda Item No. 8C. ZA 98-072, Plat Revision for proposed lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 1 Georgetown Park. The only significant issue regarding this request is that the south lot proposed with this plat does not have the required street frontage. The previously approved plat for this subdivision approved three lots with no street frontage. Common access easements have been provided for access to the lots. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved this request (6-0) granting relief for the required street frontage. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 29. Agenda Item No. 10A. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a franchise agreement with Bluebonnet Waste Control Inc. for commercial construction waste Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 15 collection. Bluebonnet Waste recently requested to enter into a franchise agreement with the City to provide commercial waste collection for commercial construction sites. We have had other requests to provide such service, however, they have not wanted to pursue obtaining a franchise agreement. In this agreement, we have limited Bluebonnet to only one commercial construction site. The memo from Darcey Imm discusses our ordinance and process for consideration of these types of requests. One issue that Council should consider is the fact that the commercial collection fees often help control the overall cost of residential collection. As we move forward with our new commercial/construction waste ordinance we must think about how we can attempt to maintain a level playing field for all of the contractors who may apply to provide such service. A representative from Bluebonnet Waste (hiry will be available on Tuesday to answer any questions you may have. 30. Agenda Item No. IOB. Authorization to advertise for bids for signalization at F.M. 1709 and Shady Oaks Drive, F.M. 1709 and Commerce Street, and North White Chapel Boulevard and Ascot. The signalization of these intersections have been previously approved by City Council. Note these items can be bid individually and/or all together. Likewise, should it be necessary, City Council can consider these three signal locations individually or together. As with all bids, once bid, the signals will be brought back to City Council to accept or reject. We have held these items off the agenda while we addressed more pressing development issues, however, we have already missed the opening for school for both the Shady Oaks and Ascot signals. (or, Please let me know if you have any questions concerning these items. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 16 31. Agenda Item No. 10C. Authorize the offset of fees and expenses for Kirkwood Hollow, Phase I, against the City's obligation to Developer for previous water improvement cost as set out in the Developer Agreement approved on October 2, 1997. As mentioned previously, the Solana developers paid approximately $850k for the development of the City of Southlake's water system in the vicinity of the Dove/White Chapel area. In return for these improvements the City of Southlake agreed to reimburse the developer, Maguire Partners/IBM, at the time the development connects to the City of Southlake's water system. Currently Solana is served on both sides of S.H. 114 through an interlocal agreement with the Trophy Club MUD. We will soon be connecting Solana to our water and sewer system. Our developers agreement with Solana for Kirkwood Hollow Phase I provides that we will accept an offset of Maguire Partners development fees to reduce the money "fronted" by Solana for the development of our system in 1987-88. The item before you will credit $377,779 to offset our obligation to Solana. 32. Agenda Item No. 11A. Update on the upcoming TxDOT presentation regarding the proposed F.M. 1938 extension and S.H. 114 improvements. This item will provide me the opportunity to inform you of the recent progress on this issue, and to get the message out to the citizens about the upcoming September 24 presentation before the Texas Department of Transportation in Austin concerning the proposed F.M. 1938 extension and SH114 improvements. Included in your packet is a letter from TxDOT informing us that the Metroport Cities Partnership is confirmed to appear before the Commission on September 24. This is exciting news, especially after the extremely successful meeting we had with the City of Keller, the Town of Westlake, Tarrant County, and the Hillwood Group on July 8, and the subsequent meeting with Rondell Fagan of TxDOT on July 9. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 17 The parties involved have agreed upon a road placement that will be presented at the public meeting on July 22. The public meeting is the first step in the process, and we have attempted to publicize the event as extensively as possible - press releases have been sent to all our media contacts, information has been included in the City Manager's Report, on the Web Page, and on the cable channel. Individual letters were sent to all the homeowners who live on FM 1938 inviting them to attend this meeting. We will go over the purpose of the public meeting, and the process to be followed, during the Council meeting Tuesday night. Council is encouraged to attend the public meeting Wednesday evening if you are available. The meeting will be held at the Solana Education Center from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. 33. Agenda Item No. 11B. Proposed S.H. 114 and F.M. 1709 Highway Intersection Bond Project. This will become a standing item on the agenda to ensure constant communication between staff and Council as we quickly move forward with a bond election. Although no additional materials are included in your packet, staff will provide you with some updated materials on Tuesday. 34. Agenda Item No. 11C. Implementation of Drought Contingency Plan. We are sure that you have had calls or heard conversations about this issue, so we placed it on the agenda to give you an opportunity to discuss it with staff. Bob's memo does a good job of explaining the ordinance and our situation; however, as we implement the program we are (naturally) encountering scenarios which need to be carefully considered. We plan to go through these issues with you on Tuesday evening. Note that we had a situation last summer where we reached mild conditions, but moderate condition drought contingency measures, i.e., mandatory watering Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 18 schedules and prohibited activities, have not been implemented since our ordinance was adopted. As such, there is considerable concern in the community over lawns, swimming pools, etc. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on the plan, recognizing that our primary concern in this situation is our ability to provide the flow necessary to fight fires and the water needed for health and sanitation, including daily activities such as showers, cooking, etc. This is, without question, a delicate balance to try to achieve. 35. Agenda Item No. 11D. Project Priorities for Community Development. Attached to the memo from Director Last is the anticipated schedule for the various projects ranked during the June Retreat. Director Last will lead a discussion of this schedule at the meeting to ensure the list reflects Council's intentions. Feel free to contact Greg or Karen Gandy should you have any questions. L 36. Agenda Item No. 11E. Workgroup Update. Attached to the memo from Karen Gandy is a matrix showing projects from the June Retreat ranking. These are projects we anticipate to be coordinated through workgroups. We have forwarded the matrix to the Planning and Zoning Commission as well, and asked them to forward to Karen any areas of interest that they might have. The matrix will be revised to include their interests prior to your Council meeting. The purpose of this item on the agenda is to seek your individual interests in each workgroup and to identify others you would like for us to include in the process. Feel free to contact Karen should you have any questions. Other Items of Interest 37. Southlake Sister Cities Trips. A youth delegation will be traveling to our sister city in Toyoma, Japan, July 23-30. Shelli Siemer, senior community services (kr coordinator, will be accompanying the seven students as the chaperone. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 19 An adult trip is planned for September 16-24. Currently, the delegation includes: Ralph & Linda Evans, Gary & Chris Fickes, Brad Bradley, and possibly a resident from our sister city in El Fuerte, Mexico. I plan to go over again on vacation during this time because it will be the time of Toyoma's fall festival, however, my scheduled days will not exactly mirror that of the official delegation. If anyone else is interested in going on this trip, contact Tracy Southers at ext. 819. 38. Activity with Telecommunications Providers. Three companies wishing to obtain franchise agreements to provide telecommunication services within the city have recently approached staff. This is not unanticipated, given the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which has opened up cable, telephone and other telecommunications markets for competition. (me The agreements they have proposed are currently under review by Analeslie Muncy in the City Attorney's Office. The three companies and their proposed services are listed below: • Metricom, Inc. - Metricom, Inc. is a wireless Internet access company which provides mobile information access and Internet services through a high speed "Ricochet" wireless network. A copy of the brochure describing their services is attached to my memo. Metricom is approaching many cities in the metroplex to obtain a right-of-way use agreement to mount small radio transceivers (about the size of a small shoebox) on a few of the city's light poles. Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton, Public Works Director Bob Whitehead, and Analeslie Muncy met with Metricom representatives last week L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 LPage 20 to learn more about their product/service and their proposed use of the city's rights-of-way. You can anticipate an agreement with Metricom coming forward to you for consideration very quickly. In the meantime, please feel free to call Shana if you have questions. • E.Spire Communications, Inc. - This company has proposed "passing through" Southlake with its telecommunications system. Staff has not yet had an opportunity to visit with company representatives, however, we know that they will propose underground construction and utilization of TU Electric and Tri- County's pole lines. • Millennium Telecommunications - This company is interested in providing telephone and cable service to residents of Southlake, and is seeking franchise agreements similar to that of Southwestern Bell and Marcus Cable. Staff has met with their consultant to discuss specific plans. They, too, submitted draft franchise agreements to us for review and Analeslie is currently working on those. Questions related to these items should be directed to Shana Yelverton. 39. Exchange with Crossroads Square for park property. The closing on the exchange was delayed due to issues related to the title for the property we are obtaining. Our attorneys have worked with the property owner's attorneys to successfully resolve the problem, and we are scheduled to close next Tuesday. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 L. Page 21 40. Meeting with Trinity Waste. Shana Yelverton and I met with Doug Rivers, Municipal Marketing Manager for Trinity Waste Systems, on Wednesday, July 8. We discussed specific service issues and reviewed complaint data with Mr. Rivers. It is encouraging to note that since Trinity has added the additional route (mid-June) complaints to our office and Trinity's office have declined significantly. There are still issues, however, so we discussed several options for addressing them to anticipate and minimize problems. We are optimistic that our initiatives will help the situation, but we also recognize that labor issues for Trinity during the summer months (not to mention the effects of such a good economy) will continue to create challenges for us all. (FYI, Mr. Rivers stated that he had hired 23 additional sanitation workers the week prior to our meeting. At the time of our meeting, only seven remained on his payroll.) Please let Shana know if you hear of service problems. We have developed some specific customer service initiatives to implement when customers have problems; however, if we are unaware of the issues we will be unable to take care of their concerns. Your help as "eyes and ears" would be greatly appreciated! 41. Fretwell Family Reunion. This Sunday, July 19, I will be attending the Fretwell Family Reunion at Bob Jones Park. The Fretwell's are descendents of Bob Jones, and I understand the grandson of Bob Jones is planning to attend. The Fretwell's have invited me to discuss the park, the history of how the name was chosen, and highlight future plans for the park. The event will be held at 3:00 p.m., and Council is welcome to attend. 42. Senior Center Costs/Donations. The final figures on the senior center renovation project are compiled with a total project cost of $55,000. This leaves $63,000 remaining from the budgeted amount of $118,000. The total value of the donations received for the project is estimated at $200,000. This includes $171,000 donated Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 22 in the form of materials, furnishings, professional services, and construction project management services. The remaining $29,000 is considered the cost savings associated with using volunteers to complete the work. Over 2,800 volunteer hours contributed to the project. As you recall, when SPDC increased the funding for the renovation project from $50,000 to $118,000 it was under the condition that the project team continue to focus on obtaining donations and using volunteers to complete the work. The extent of the community's involvement was unknown at the time, but it is clear the commitment from the organizations and individuals throughout the community resulted in a much better facility for the senior citizens than originally anticipated. 43. The SPIN Executive Committee is currently working on the details for their Planning and Zoning Academy. They are planning to present the concept to you at the Joint SPIN/City Council meeting on August 13th. It is anticipated they will ask you if you want participate in the Academy, which is scheduled for Tuesday, November 10th in the City Council Chambers. The project leader for this event is Angela George. 44. Texas American Planning Association. Planning Excellence Recognition: Attached you will find the transmittal letter and a copy of the certificate we have received from the Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association, for the award we mentioned to you previously. This reflects significant accomplishments on the part of the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council as well as our planning staff. We appreciate your hard work and hope that you share our pride in this professional recognition. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 23 45. Economic Development Activities. Following are some recent activities from the Economic Development staff. Feel free to contact Kate Barlow (ext. 776) or Director Last (ext. 750) if you have questions or would like additional information. • July Chamber of Commerce Report. Attached to my memo is a copy of the July 1998 Chamber of Commerce Report presented at the monthly Southlake Chamber Board meeting. Attached to this report is the 1998 Southlake Traffic Count Report that has been mailed to over 75 members of the commercial development community and Southlake based realty offices. • American Chamber of Commerce Research Association (ACCRA) survey. Staff has recently assisted the Greater Dallas Chamber with compilation of data for the quarterly ACCRA Cost of Living Survey. This survey provides a comparison of living costs between major U.S. cities that is often considered during the site selection process. • June 1998 OED Fact Column. Attached is a copy of the June Fact Column that is distributed to over 20 local print. • Recent articles featuring Southlake businesses. Attached are articles from the Fort Worth Star -Telegram highlighting Mi Cocina's expansion into Southlake as they prepare to open in Southlake's Town Square, and an article about Southlake home-based Gourmet at Home. Pamela Fagan, of Southlake based InterActive Training Solutions, has been featured recently in the Dallas Business Journal. Also attached is a list of Tarrant County's largest environmental contractors, as researched by The Business Press, including Southlake based Unified Services of Texas (#15), and D&G Specialties Inc. (#21). L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 24 46. Staff Departures. I wanted to inform you of some recent resignations by staff members. Assistant to the City Manager Darcey Imm, Zoning Assistant Tim Woloshyn, and Public Works Administrative Secretary Laurie Sheets have informed me that they will be leaving employment with the City of Southlake. Darcey is moving to northern California, Tim is moving to the Cayman Islands, and Laurie is moving to Oklahoma. Please join me and the rest of the staff in thanking them for all their good work. Note that I have decided to promote Senior Community Services Coordinator Shelli Siemer into the position of Assistant to the City Manager. Shelli will assume her new duties officially on August 10, but is already working with Darcey to ensure a smooth transition. Advertisements have already been placed to fill the remaining positions. L 47. Note the attached: • Reminder - Tuesday, July 21, 4:30 p.m., Awards Ceremony for City's Water storage tank at Pearson and FM 1709 (see attached) • News release - Brumlow Avenue closing • Notice of public hearing on the water quality management plan for North Central Texas. We thought this would be of interest to you. 48. Agenda Length. We apologize for the length of this agenda. We have had much on our plate for the last several months and none of us, Council or staff, like long meetings. Some of these items we have been holding back trying to find a "light" agenda. There is not likely to be such for some time. Additionally, much of what we have included in the packet and on the agenda requires City Council attention at this time. Hopefully all of you will be at the work session beginning at 5:00 p.m. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 25 Tuesday evening or will be able to attend the Council briefing Monday afternoon, or will call if you have questions about any item on the agenda. On a related matter, I have received a number of inquiries as to whether or not we should videotape the work sessions that begin at 5:00 p.m. Let me know your thoughts on this matter. 49.Westlake issues. There have been a number of developments related to the Southlake/Solana/Westlake issue that we need to discuss with you Tuesday night. Most of these occurred today so we have not been able to discuss with City Council. There is a possibility that there will be something in the newspaper over the weekend that will mention Southlake. Given the nature of the controversy it would not be appropriate to say anything more at this time. Hopefully, things will (kiw, stay quiet until we have a chance to talk with our attorneys Tuesday night. CEH Staff Extension Numbers: Barlow, Kate, Economic Development Specialist, ext. 776 Bloomberg, Chuck, Plans Examiner, ext. 747 Campbell, Billy, Director DPS, ext. 730 Carpenter, Chris, Planner, ext. 866 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, City Engineer, ext. 779 Hawk, Curtis E., ext. 701 Heath, Lou Ann, Director of Finance, ext. 716 Henry, Ben, Parks Planning and Construction Superintendent, ext. 824 Hugman, Kevin, Interim Parks and Recreation Director, ext. 757 Imm, Darcey, Assistant to the City Manager, ext. 759 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest July 17, 1998 Page 26 Last, Greg, Community Development Director, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 Jackson, Malcolm, DPS Administrative Coordinator, ext. 726 Safranek, Lauren, Director of Human Resources, ext. 836 Sarakaitis, Stefanie, Comprehensive Planner, ext. 753 Thomas, Charlie, Deputy Director of Public Works, ext. 814 Wilson, Garland, Deputy Director Fire Services, ext. 735 Whitehead, Bob, Director of Public Works, ext. 740 Whitehead, Nona, Community Services Coordinator, ext. 834 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 M:\W D-FILES\C EH\MEETINGS\98-07-21.doc y __÷ City of Southlake la- , Administrative Offices July 10, 1998 Mayor: Rick Stacy Mayor Pro Tern: W. Ralph Evans Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: Ted Gillum, Ed. D. David A.Harris Superintendent _ Councilmernbers: Carroll Independent School District Wayne Moffat Pamela A.Muller 1201 N. Carroll Avenue Gary Fawks Southlake, TX 76092 Scott F.Martin via facsimile and regular mail City Manager. Curtis E. Hawk Assistant City Manager: Shana K.Yelverton Dear Ted: S L. LeGrand agreementoutliningn Secretary: SandraAttached is a draft of a lease the terms for CISD to participate in the Town Hall. This agreement provides approximately 23,000 square feet for CISD of which approximately 6,200 square feet is shared space. This was the amount that you had indicated that was sufficient at our meeting on July 1. However, in reviewing the letter dated July 8, it appears that this may not accommodate all of your space wishes. I have an alternative which I believe will allow us to maximize the benefits we have discussed to date, and provide CISD with greater autonomy and flexibility in designing and operating their administrative offices. I have spoken with the developer of Town Square about the possibility of constructing an annex to the Town Hall approximately one block north of the Town Hall. The developer has agreed to work with us in this regard. This building could be built to the specifications completely determined by the school district. This would free you from the many constraints we are currently faced with in ensuring that our new Town Hall is of the highest quality and built in a timely fashion. The annex would be eligible for reimbursement through the TIRZ. Also, this would allow CISD ample time to investigate its options concerning TIF participation and other items which have delayed the current process. It would allow the City and the County to proceed with the current plans for the building without having to delay further in order to satisfy CISD requirements. Please inform me if you are interested in pursuing this alternative, and we will work together to finalize many of the outstanding details. 1725 East Southlake Blvd.• Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-6796 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' Ted Gillum July 10, 1998 Page 2 Another issue which was raised at the joint City Council-School Board Meeting was the request by CISD that the City pay for the parking associated with the stadium if it were to be located in Town Square. We have attempted to find a way in which the City could accommodate your wishes, unfortunately there does not appear to be a viable alternative. The first possibility the City investigated was the possibility of providing the 1800 spaces CISD requested through surface parking. In discussing this option with the developer of Town Square, this would be impossible given the geophysical constraints of the land and the development plans for Town Square. In analyzing the area, it is clear that only approximately 1200 spaces could be located within an 8-9 acre area surrounding the proposed CISD stadium site, and that nearly 15 acres would be required to accommodate the 1800 spaces you have indicated would be necessary. In their July 7 meeting, City Council voiced concern with the CISD request that the stadium be moved from the area immediately behind Home Depot, as originally offered by the developer, to a site that is more integral to the economic development objectives of Town Square. They emphasized that the increased area and more economically desirable location currently proposed by CISD would significantly impact the projected revenues anticipated from the Reinvestment Zone, and could adversely impact the development. Hopefully CISD will reconsider the original location. Recognizing that a multi-level parking garage would be the only alternative to accommodate your (600, parking needs, Council discussed the various funding sources that would be available. It was felt that both the general fund and SPDC funds had many demands upon them which were of a higher priority than a parking facility for a football stadium. They felt they could not justify restructuring their priorities to the citizens of Southlake. The parking structure would be an eligible project for the Reinvestment Zone, however without CISD's contribution to the TIRZ it would be impossible for us to have sufficient funds to cover such an expenditure for several years. This does not preclude the school district from paying for the parking structure, and being reimbursed from the TIRZ once funds become available. Please let me know your reaction to the lease and the above comments. It in my assumption that City Council will vote on the matter on July 21. Sincerely Curtis E. awk, City Manager C s RICOCHET® BY METRICOM®: BEITTER WIRELESS DATA SERVICES FOR YOUR COMMUNITY eft I acint "Having Ricochet means that the students at Malcolm X Elementary are able to access a very crucial research and communications tool, and, ultimately, become better lifelong learners." DR.JOHN PANNELL, PRINCIPAL MALCOLNI X ELEMENTARY, WASHINGTON, D.C. Metricom . RICOCHET BY METRICOM Would you like to offer your community low-cost, high-speed online access—with (0,j no cabling, trenching or public investment? NIetricom's twelve-year track record speaks for itself. Our experience enables us to offer the 11111 fastest and most reliable mobile data services in the industry. Leapfrogging current performance `San Jose is known throughout the world as the Capitol of Silicon Ualley.constituents wireless Internet, e-mail, and local We have earned this standards, our new network will provide your distinction, not only because we house the nation's tophigh area network access at speeds up to 128 Kbps— g -tech firms in our own backyard, but because we use the latest state-of-the-art technolor comparable to expensive ISDN connections. in our day-to-day operations. Our police and fire teams,finance department, libraries, and Inter- national Airport management use Metricom's wireless data network to access information and =-` communicate in real time from off-site-site locations. "'"} Being able to utilize key technology while retaining 3 -r � f - a sense of community is SanJose's`�Y-,, key to success.' MAYOR SUSAN HAMMER 3£: CTrY OF SAN JOSE re Y.Y�Jam-:-- y. -°� WIRELESS . . 4, , ' With Ricochet service, inspectors can issue permits from the field,, mobile libraries can have Internet �" access, cities can monitor and control utility functions remotely,y, attorneys can check e-mail from the courthouse,}�'•_ realtors and contractors can r keep in touch with their offices. Grandparents can communicate with loved ones online. The uses are 5r" k practically limitless! y fl -> "f `994 City of Cupertino and Stanford University test Ricochet roiseltss In: T ~ e' SIMPLE _ S:� Because Metricom's Ricochet poletop radios are so simple to ILinstall, bringing wireless Internet ac ess to public services, schools, and corporate tenants becomes much easier—even in areas where it would be difficult to provide additional cabling. _- - 4 Many small and large corporations use Ricochet wireless technology extensively. They appreciate the flexibility of being able to relocate data lines without rewiring. Attoi 4/11, / Seattle City Light field crews save time by .4--- using Ricochet to log onto their internal network 0111111111 ,.., and obtain critical repair information from remote locations. SEATTLE CITY LIGHT,POWER L,TELITY COMPANY (.... "Ricochet is a product that does what it says, and it could 1?0•••••<,-----1 be a boon for mobile users—or for anybody who's tired of hassling with telephone connections to the Trrew:e:. WALT MOSS 3_RG THE WALL STREET JOURNAL VALUABLE Many government agencies already use Ricochet, _ including local post offices, public schools, and city °` �,• '+ :.i�+` ::4.. councils. Residents can order stamps using the system J '7, f i and can participate in wireless city council meetings. . $lir it: MIS —-- Seniors can enjoy e-mail and communicate with loved - -.1 ones far away. With laptops and Ricochet modems in -. - squad cars, police departments can file reports from the ..11* field, allowing squad cars to spend more time on patrol. L ice...z995:San;ose:s't trcom s first covered city with a stand-alone population of over t,000,oc ... _qqo:s;r.:t.:e - , -. :.t:inch Ricochet wireless senric CONVENIENT Because of our unique network design and patented ` routing technology, Ricochet users do not experience the ' well-publicized busy signals that cause an uproar among . users of other popular online services and wired Internet 1 service providers. Our packet-switched system uses .l available radio frequencies so efficiently that it's easy `' 1 to add additional users onto the same channel. Expanding network capacity and coverage is as simple 1141/ *.caehe. as mounting new radios. And because the Ricochet network is completely private to the point it reaches the Internet, we provide unmatched wireless security through RSA encryption. 'Because of the way the phone lines were set up, in the past, we had to run from the counter to the LOW IMPACT back of the shop to scan a credit card. And, what's worse, with every purchase, Greater demand for Internet access, fax lines, and we were tying up a phone line. additional phone service has placed a significant Most of our business is over the phone, burden on existing phone capacity. Increasing y so we can't afford to lose customers bandwidth for these technologies typically involves to a busy signal. With Ricochet, a significant infrastructure upgrade. Metricom, we don't have to.' however, simply installs small radio transceivers on streetlight and utility poles, at no cost to your TAMI MURRAY,OFFICE MANAGER community.These shoebox-sized radios FENA FLOWERS,SEATTLE,WA have low visual or environmental impact. It's the fastest, easiest way to increase available bandwidth ( 111S for data services—without �. trenching,cables or street hardware. - We are proud to offer a technology that has such little impact on your neighborhood. Radios are generally mounted on less than 3% of poles in a given region, and operate in the public spectrum, similar to devices like garage door openers and baby monitors. Ricochet begins development of a high-peed u8K,wireless network... r998:Metricom wins state approval ror usage 4.Southern and Central California street lights... • t EXPANDING Hundreds of communities like yours have given Metricom right-of-way approval. We have installed - thousands of streetlight radios, providing access to 1 1 some of the country's most technologically advanced /� ;‘ institutions — organizations like Microsoft and the " ` 1.4 NASA-Ames Research Center,and universities like -- . ' Stanford and George Washington University. Municipal employees use our services in growing numbers. We continue to gain new subscribers in the I San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, and Washington, ii/ . Air-Y D.C. regions and also offer coverage to many corporate campuses and airports throughout the 1, IIER 7 nation. i , OPPORTUNITY tiw 'i ..10411/4 We're offering you a unique public-private opportunity to bring your community new l ways of communicating—without wires. A simple right-of-way approval is all it takes F ' to get on board. With the Ricochet network and wireless technology, you can be online k . anytime, anywhere. Prepare your community for greater productivity with Ricochet dre,ho high-speed wireless communications from 'Ricochet Metricom. has given me total independence. i ;:.ar. set up my laptop and portable printer and A representative will contact you to discuss our dazze potential buyers with color presentations right-of-way application. of 'omes anywhere in the marketplace. I can :all:In :he latest listings right there, so the For more information on the Ricochet system by c:tsromer gets instant information and I get Metricom, see us online at,www.metricom.com. .a :.mite s.a:e. < Or e-mail requests to: rightofk•ayCricochet.net. cr, HUGH KELLY. BROKER PARDUE REAL ESTATE,WASHINGTON,D.C. « -r-- r- • . : . f. akIbletriCCIASDIAn4:1"?..-.. ;:•:.;;T::'1 MCOM),founded " in 1985,is the leader in wireless data ' i communications e technology,and r develops and /":, markets the Ricochet wireless network and services.Ricochet offers low-cost, 11 high-performance, and easy-to-use �. ,— data communi cations for a broad range of personal f, tr� Li � and commercial , I applications.Our '= wireless service gives users fast, reliable,unlimited access to the . Internet,e-mail, private intranets, Granting Metricom access to your right-of-way ensures... local area networks No SURPRISES BENEFITS TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS (LANs),and online • Metricom has a twelve-year track record in services.To learn the wireless telecommunications industry Wireless freedom more about • Radios are installed in hundreds of • Travels with your laptop or handheld device Metricom and the municipalities across the U.S. • No need to install an extra phone line • Thousands of satisfied subscribers prefer • Send e-mail without tying up a phone line Ricochet service, Ricochet over wire line services • Stay in touch online,regardless of location visit us online at EASE OF ADMINISTRATION Unlimited access www.metricom.com • Each radio installed by Metricom in minutes • Stay online 24 hours a day or wwwricochet.net. • Minimal maintenance or ongoing • No busy signals administration required • No dropped connections Metricom,Inc. LAW AESTHETIC IMPACT Low flat-rate pricing 980 University Avenue • Shoebox-sized radios are mounted on • No airtime charges Los Gatos,CA 95032 existing structures • No billing surprises • Typically,no more than seven radios installed 408.399.8200 per square mile(less than 3%of streetlight Convenient technology poles per region) • ISDN speed—performance comparable to www.metricom.com wire line solutions • No trenching,cabling or street hardware • Compatible with desktop,laptop or handheld www.ricochet.net ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY computer devices rightofway@ricochet.net • Authorized by the FCC CO operate in the • RSA security—safe against eavesdropping public spectrum under Part 15 of FCC rules; tether Part 15 devices include garage door (..., eners and baby monitors i ' Copyright 0 1998 Nletricom,loc.AU rights reserved.As with telephone modems and wireless services.speeds vary based on location,application,hardware.and software- To benefit from the Ricochet wireless services offered by Merricom,users must be within the coverage areas of the Ricochet wireless network.Metricom.Ricochet.and Metricom Mic oCdlular Data Network are registered trademarks of Metricom,Inc.All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.Additional photos by Larry Dale Gordon and Stephen Wilkes.0 i995 The Image Bank. Printed on recycled paper. - P/N ROWI-5/98 !IAPA. TEXAS June 1, 1998 Honorable Rick Stacy Mayor, City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 RE: Certificate of Planning Excellence Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association Dear Mayor Stacy: It is with great pleasure that the Texas Chapter of the American or Planning Planning ann ng Association o your presents the attached "Certificate of Achievement City Planning Department. by your This certificate recognizes professional planning that standards ou and other Counc�members planning staff and further recognizes the supportY hav e exhibited with regard to funding and support of professional planning efforts in your city. Representatives of Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association congratulate you and your administration for receiving this recognition. Respectfully, David R. Gattis, AICP President, Texas Chapter American Planning Association cc: Greg Last pAYIC R.GATTtS.AICP MICHAEL O.McANE'_Y.AlCR HELEN-EYE L.L;E N 3M1.4 ANN C.aAi,LE•r.A,cP T-c.unr_- A�.IE°.'"AN �.,: ?x�...:r. PLANNING Pr"'.l`"` 972:770-1300 A3.30C:4 `CN 817:249.3000 713/795-3080 TEXAS CHAPTER APA TEXAS CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT For PLANNING EXCELLENCE Presented to the City of Southlake, Texas 1998 Recognizing a commitment to professional planning by City Administration, Elected and Appointed Officials and exemplary professional standards demonstrated by the Planning Staff Awarded By Texas Chapter— The American Planning Association JIIIJ ' U 1 `•NWV (i iCc OF CITY a L City of Southlake MANAGER Chamber of Commerce Report t - Date: July 9, 1998 Presented To: Chamber of Commerce Board Prepared By: Economic Development Staff- Greg Last, Kate Barlow Following are selected items of interest related to economic development in the City of Southlake. RECENT DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS • June 16, 1998: Council approved rezoning(SF-20A)and concept plan for Pine Meadow Estates at the southeast corner of Shady Lane and North Kimball Avenue. Pine Meadow will feature 41 residential lots. • July 7, 1998: Council approved rezoning(S-P-2 General Site Plan for senior adult living complex) and concept plan for The Remington involving 22.6 acres south of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard and West Jellico Circle. This$20M complex will feature triplex,quadraplex and pentaplex villas, personal care facility, skilled nursing suites, and senior multi-family units. The next step in the development process is site planning and platting followed by an anticipated (lier construction start date of Spring, 1999. • July 7, 1998: Council approved a clarification to the Trail System Master Plan designating the side of the road to place off-road trails as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Board. DEVELOPMENT UPDATES • Southlake Town Square: The City and Carroll ISD are working on the lease delineating the conditions for CISD to occupy space within Town Hall. REGULATORY ISSUES • Impervious Coverage and Residential Adjacency Ordinances: Members of the workgroup are working independently on Impervious Coverage(Ordinance No. 480-BB) issues and will resume their meetings in August. Draft 6 of Ordinance No. 480-CC (Corridor Overlay Zoned revisions and Residential Adjacency Standards) has been recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and was approved by the Council during First Reading on July 7, 1998. Minor formatting changes are anticipated in Draft 7 which will appear on Council's agenda for Second Reading on July 21, 1998. Staff Contact: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743. • Sexually Oriented Business Ordinance: Staff is continuing to complete the required study It which will accompany these ordinance revisions. Staff contact: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743. Chamber of Commerce Report July 9, 1998 Page 1 (6, , • Sign Ordinance Update:The Workgroup,composed of Mayor Stacy, P&Z Chairman Creighton, former Councilmember Pamela Muller, and staff members, has held four meetings to date to discuss recommended changes. As a result of these meetings, certain sign prohibitions have been proposed. new sign regulations have been recommended, and existing regulations may be modified. Per City Council's discussion of this item on June 16, 1998, the ordinance is being forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review and consideration on July 9, 1998. Staff contact: Stefanie Sarakaitis, Comprehensive Planner, 481-5581, ext. 753. STAFF PROJECT UPDATES • Traffic Counts: Attached is a copy of the final Traffic Count Report for the city of Southlake. These counts were taken last month and have been summarized in a clear and concise format. We will distribute the report to attendees of the Commercial Development Roundtable and other interested parties. Staff Contact: Chris Carpenter, Senior Comprehensive Planner, 481-5581, ext. 866. • Southlake Fast Facts: Staff has recently revised this popular economic development brochure. If you would like copies for reference, contact Kate Barlow. INTERESTING DATA • Residential Permits: 59 issued in June, Average Permit Value for 1998 is $262,900. • Commercial Permits: 5 permits issued in June including 4,270 SF at 500 N. Carroll Ave. (south Lof Post Office); 5,777 SF at 502 N. Carroll Ave. (south of Post Office); 8,864 SF at 771 E. Southlake Boulevard(Creekside Office); 13,844 SF at 2805 Market Loop (Commerce Business Park); and 8,400 SF at 2105 Greenwood Drive (North Davis Business Park). • General Fund Sales Tax Revenues: May `98 collections totaled $217,760; Fiscal Year to date up 38.0%. • Monthly Fact Column: Attached is the June 1998 Office of Economic Development Monthly Fact Column distributed to area media. • NEW- Planning Excellence Recognition: For the second year in a row, the City of Southlake received recognition from the Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association for the demonstration of professional planning standards by planning staff, and further recognizing the support exhibited by Council with regard to funding and support of professional planning efforts in Southlake. The transmittal letter from TxAPA is attached. • The 5.0 million Pearson Ground Water Storage Tank has been named national "Tank of the Year" by the national Steel Plate Fabricators Association. FUTURE EVENTS oic • NTCAR Expo: Economic Development staff is planning to participate in the North Texas Commercial Association of Realtors Expo scheduled for Monday, August 31, from 4 to 8 p.m. More information will follow. Chamber of Commerce Report July 9, 1998 Page 2 L. • Dates for the FY99 City Budget work sessions, open to the public, will be finalized within the next few weeks. For further information contact: Community Development Department Phone: (817) 481-5581 / Fax: (817)488-9370 Greg Last, Community Development Director, ext. 744 Kate Barlow, Economic Development Specialist, ext. 776 Attachments: Lam- %W^�ECOOCV MULCTS ILIPOIITT07416941.WTO • Letter from TxAPA recognizing Southlake as a recipient of the Planning Excellence Recognition. • Final Traffic Count Report • June 1998 OED Monthly Fact Column Copies To: City Council Planning and Zoning Commission Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Clum Chamber of Commerce Report July 9, 1998 Page 3 _ s City of Southlake Traffic Count Report June 26, 1998 410 Ili* sit et Prepared Jointly by: Community Development Economic Development Public Works 'M. (Ip., City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Table of Contents I. Introduction Page 1 A. Purpose of the Report Page 1 B. Assumptions and Methodology Page 1 C. Definitions Page 2 II. Exhibits Page 3 Table 1: Traffic Count Locator Key and Associated Volumes Page 3 Figure 1: Traffic Count Locator Map Page 7 Introduction The City of Southlake is a rapidly growing community. As such, the more data that can be accumulated to monitor trends related to growth, the better. One data type that is an extremely useful tool for both municipal and private development planning purposes is traffic counts. The remainder of this report will explain the basic traffic volume data recently collected in Southlake.It is also anticipated that periodic,updated data will be inserted as it is received by the city as part of Traffic Impact Analysis submittals for developments. It is also anticipated that the entire report will be updated with new counts on at least an annual basis. A. Purpose of the Report This report has several notable uses. Its most important use is as a"snapshot"of the traffic volume conditions in a fixed point in time. Traffic data from different time periods can be used to analyze trends and assist in correcting problem areas. Traffic data is the foundation of many specialized studies, such as warrant studies, and is used in part when updating the city's Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP), which is the basis for acquiring the appropriate amounts of right-of-way necessary to accommodate the ultimate roadways needed in the city. This report also provides a considerable economic development service in that it is a valuable tool for real estate brokers, lenders, developers, and others with similar interests. Traffic volume is a critical factor associated with many of the decision points made by these companies when looking to locate businesses in a particular region. This traffic report will also provide any other interested party, be it a resident, homeowner, or etc., the ability to have current traffic data available to them for any area of interest in the city. B. Assumptions and Methodology For this report,the City of Southlake contracted with Quality Counts, a traffic counting firm located in Richardson,Texas, to place the traffic counters in Southlake, download the data to a raw data file, and provide a printed copy of this data. The traffic counters were placed at all 57 locations(both directions),and data was collected from May 26, 1998,through May 28, 1998.The City of Southlake Comprehensive Planning staff has used this raw data as the basis for this report,which is most particularly revealed in"Table 1: Traffic Count Locator Key and Associated Volumes"on page 3. Please also note that a map depicting the location of these counts follows the table. Total traffic volume (each direction) was compiled in 15-minute intervals for a 24-hour period of time. These counts are represented under the column"24'Hour Total"in Table 1. Data also appears for morning and evening peak hour counts.There are several more detailed analyses that can be performed by using base traffic count data, and it is anticipated that this report will be revised at various times to reflect some of these analyses. Please refer to the City of Southlake- Traffic Count Report:June 26, 1998 Page 1 of 7 following section on"Definitions"for detailed explanations of these and other terms relevant to this report. An important note to consider when reading Table 1 is that one row represents one direction; both segment directions must be combined to obtain the two-way, total roadway volume. C. Definitions t. Ref #-The number associated with a one-directional traffic count location in both Table 1 and on the map in Figure 1. Segment—A particular area of roadway,with a beginning point("From")and an end point ("To")location. Direction—The direction of traffic flow for each location.Each location has two directions, each in a separate row in Table 1, for both northbound and southbound (NB, SB) or westbound and eastbound(WB,EB). 24-Hour Totals—The total traffic volume(each direction)counted during the 24-hour period from 12 a.m. (midnight)to 12 a.m. (midnight)the following day. A.M. Peak Hour—The one-hour time period between 12 a.m. (midnight)and 12 p.m. (noon) during which the highest one-hour traffic volume occurs, and the associated traffic counts. P.M Peak Hour—The one-hour time period between 12 p.m. (noon)and 12 a.m. (midnight) during which the highest one-hour traffic volume occurs, and the associated traffic counts. Also note that the raw data sheets, with the daily traffic broken out in 15-minute intervals and the peak hours defined for each segment, can be obtained from the City of Southlake Community Development Department for the cost of reproduction (10 cents per page). Please contact Chris Carpenter, Senior Comprehensive Planner, at(817) 481-5581, Ext. 866 for more information. C City of Southlake- Traffic Count Report:June 26, 1998 Page 2 of 7 b C., H. Exhibits Table 1: Traffic Count Locator Key and Associated Volumes _ ,. RcI r„: r i H ,i L) f)uccrinn 2-+- \ \1 I, 1 1„LI I I,,,n i I.' 1 S.H. 114 F.M. 1709 Kimball WB 29694 2038 2513 2 S.H. 114 F.M. 1709 Kimball EB 27808 2710 1985 3 S.H. 114 Kimball Carroll WB 24152 1850 2080 4 S.H. 114 Kimball Carroll EB 23563 1919 1816 5 S.H. 114 Carroll White Chapel WB 23712 1857 2066 6 S.H. 114 Carroll White Chapel EB 22593 2171 1759 7 S.H. 114 White Chapel Dove WB 19675 1818 1854 8 S.H. 114 White Chapel Dove EB 22403 1943 1938 9 S.H. 114 Dove Kirkwood WB 20020 1763 1882 10 S.H. 114 Dove Kirkwood EB 22099 1873 1964 11 F.M. 1709 S.H. 114 Kimball WB 16383 927 1884 t 12 F.M. 1709 S.H. 114 Kimball EB 18091 1659 1199 13 F.M. 1709 Kimball Carroll WB 20307 1120 2018 14 F.M. 1709 Kimball Carroll EB 22363 2435 1410 15 F.M. 1709 Carroll Diamond WB 18181 908 1977 16 F.M. 1709 Carroll Diamond EB 19132 1974 1274 17 F.M. 1709 Diamond White Chapel WB 18748 962 1943 18 F.M. 1709 Diamond White Chapel EB 18101 1828 1095 19 F.M. 1709 White Chapel Shady Oaks WB 16007 802 1766 20 F.M. 1709 White Chapel Shady Oaks EB 18038 1867 1231 21 F.M. 1709 Shady Oaks S'ridge Lakes Pkwy WB 17518 970 1812 22 F.M. 1709 Shady Oaks S'ridge Lakes Pkwy EB 16497 1692 986 23 F.M. 1709 S'ridge lakes Pkwy Peytonville WB 15862 865 1760 24 F.M. 1709 S'ridge lakes Pkwy Peytonville EB 15011 1589 1003 (1,..„ 25 F.M. 1709 Peytonville F.M. 1938 WB 15806 1803 26 F.M. 1709 Peytonville F.M. 1938 EB 13209 1543871 930 City of Southlake- Traffic Count Report:June 26, 1998 Page 3 of 7 o C" 1 ,, ,1 I', i) ,.,' ,, .2., \ \I 1' '.I 27 F.M. 1709 F.M. 1938 Pearson WB 12592 613 1350 28 F.M. 1709 F.M. 1938 Pearson EB 12585 1327 792 29 F.M. 1938 F.M. 1709 Union Church NB 7209 655 553 30 F.M. 1938 F.M. 1709 Union Church SB 9183 631 928 31 Continental F.M. 1938 Peytonville WB 2339 296 256 32 Continental F.M. 1938 Peytonville EB 2190 418 173 33 Continental Peytonville White Chapel WB 2493 396 255 34 Continental Peytonville White Chapel EB 2134 323 196 35 Continental White Chapel Carroll WB 2934 181 400 36 Continental White Chapel Carroll EB 3309 527 240 37 Continental Carroll Crooked Lane WB 1839 113 224 38 Continental Carroll Crooked Lane EB 2048 322 151 39 White Chapel City Limits Continental NB 3528 352 285 c, 40 White Chapel City Limits Continental SB 3337 253 327 41 White Chapel Continental F.M. 1709 NB 3553 369 287 42 White Chapel Continental F.M. 1709 SB 3589 228 322 I. 43 White Chapel F.M. 1709 Highland NB 3347 429 289 44 White Chapel F.M. 1709 Highland SB 3663 396 365 45 White Chapel Highland S.H. 114 NB 3424 556 243 46 White Chapel Highland S.H. 114 • SB 2850 313 259 47 White Chapel S.H. 114 Dove NB 1432 174 129 48 White Chapel S.H. 114 Dove SB 1385 182 138 49 White Chapel Dove Bob Jones NB 508 39 49 50 White Chapel Dove Bob Jones SB 647 57 55 51 Dove Kimball Carroll WB 1548 213 177 52 Dove Kimball Carroll EB 1521 183 169 53 Dove Carroll White Chapel WB 2098 319 246 54 Dove Carroll White Chapel EB 2022 385 203 (..„ 55 Dove White Chapel S.H. 114 WB 1181 179 146 56 Dove White Chapel S.H. 114 EB 1089 203 138 City of Southlake- Traffic Count Report:June 26, 1998 Page 4 of 7 i Lk,' • . [ , ,, ,,, , I ,,_ , '. \ \I P %I I, fluor II, , 57 Dove S.H. 114 Peytonville WB 1479 117 174 58 Dove S.H. 114 Peytonville EB 1511 214 122 59 Dove Peytonville Randol Mill WB 1214 53 162 60 Dove Peytonville Randol Mill EB 1291 223 90 61 Kimball Crooked Lane F.M. 1709 NB 1060 53 104 62 Kimball Crooked Lane F.M. 1709 SB 1113 123 89 63 Kimball F.M. 1709 S.H. 114 n NB n 6255 618 446 64 Kimball F.M. 1709 S.H. 114 SB 5469 389 474 65 Kimball S.H. 114 Shady Lane NB 4566 233 466 66 Kimball S.H. 114 Shady Lane SB 4136 412 275 67 Kimball Shady Lane Dove NB 3713 206 374 68 Kimball Shady Lane Dove SB 3510 398 212 69 Kimball Dove City Limits NB 2074 113 214 70 Kimball Dove City Limits SB 1961 224 130 C 71 Carroll Continental F.M. 1709 NB 1059 89 107 72 n Carroll Continental F.M. 1709 SB 998 83 83 73 Carroll F.M. 1709 S.H. 114 NB 2482 233 231 74 Carroll F.M. 1709 S.H. 114 SB 2115 179 213 75 Carroll S.H. 114 Dove NB 1823 218 215 76 Carroll S.H. 114 Dove - SB 2390 628 189 77 Carroll Dove Burney NB 1507 102 143 78 Carroll Dove Bumey SB 1607 215 n 131 79 Peytonville Continental F.M. 1709 NB 1597 382 122 80 Peytonville Continental F.M. 1709 SB 1556 133 183 81 Peytonville F.M. 1709 S'ridge Lakes Pkwy NB 1518 212 103 82 Peytonville F.M. 1709 S'ridge Lakes Pkwy SB 1465 154 164 83 Peytonville S'ridge Lakes Pkwy Dove NB 1047 203 91 84 Peytonville S'ridge Lakes Pkwy Dove SB - 1113 88 145 C. 85 Randol Mill F.M. 1709 Florence NB 3881 264 384 86 Randol Mill F.M. 1709 Florence SB 3683 340 343 City of Southlake- Traffic Count Report:June 26, 1998 Page 5 of 7 cv, Rr f ,„ I),i,, A \I \i , ,,, t., ,, , ,,„ , [I, r 87 Pearson F.M. 1709 Florence NB 2641 193 262 88 Pearson F.M. 1709 Florence SB 2756 231 255 89 T.W.King Kirkwood Bob Jones NB 2524 309 148 90 T.W.King Kirkwood Bob Jones SB 2377 33 293 91 Tumberry Lane Shady Oaks Peytonville WB 1313 161 100 92 Tumbeny Lane Shady Oaks Peytonville EB 689 73 46 93 Shady Oaks F.M. 1709 Highland NB 1383 310 204 94 Shady Oaks F.M. 1709 Highland SB 1287 272 145 95 Shady Oaks Highland Dove NB 715 102 70 96 Shady Oaks Highland Dove SB 615 100 64 97 Byron Nelson Pkwy Continental F.M. 1709 NB 2469 256 230 98 Byron Nelson Pkwy Continental F.M. 1709 SB 2649 192 274 99 Brumlow S.H.26 Continental NB 5073 534 418 (...„ 100 Brumlow S.H.26 Continental SB 5212 382 522 101 Crooked Lane Kimball F.M. 1709 WB 1383 154 106 102 Crooked Lane Kimball F.M. 1709 EB 1187 44 167 103 Commerce F.M. 1709 Industrial NB 2553 200 273 104 Commerce F.M. 1709 Industrial SB 1951 184 180 105 Highland Kimball Carroll WB 954 215 74 106 Highland Kimball Carroll - EB 815 100 100 107 Highland S.H. 114 White Chapel WB 1574 171 81 108 Highland S.H. 114 White Chapel EB 2104 131 235 109 Highland White Chapel Shady Oaks WB 1355 138 138 110 Highland White Chapel Shady Oaks EB 1266 154 133 111 Lonesome Dove Dove Burney NB 1368 152 107 112 Lonesome Dove Dove Burney SB 1850 130 153 113 Kirkwood S.H. 114 Precinct Line WB 891 64 181 114 Kirkwood S.H. 114 Precinct Line EB 998 227 74 C ..:. City of Southlake- Traffic Count Report:June 26, 1998 Page 6 of 7 . Figure 1: Traffic Count Locator Map a • T dab Jeer ♦ 7 -li its =%���r �,LJuC 90 .,,Nw yuiC 1��i I Vo, ,�`.,46. i3 .,`',, K - .k I 113 49 _vv T• 114 `� 9 �� U 10 78 77 is 112111 59 57 55 53 Owe No sfl 58 56 48 47 52 1 7° C3 coi 84 7 6 76 75 96 95 - . 5 91 46 45 6 7 92 109 107 105 S 110 108 106 1 Azov 94 93 44 43 66 65 -Azo _ 82 81 74 73 43 i i 1 86 85 i�� 88 87 23 21 19 �17 15 .Sa ltIcke SA 13 84'` \ 9 2s 24 22 20 18 16 14 2s 80 79 62 61 10 12: 1� 27 n 71 1�: I[ 28 • 30 29 42 41 ç 1 tAk11 Oirds 1 33 Corih fld 35 37 32 34 36 38 40 39 1..99 C City of Southlake- Traffic Count Report:June 26, 1998 Page 7 of 7 i City of Southlake,Texas Office of Economic Development Monthly Fact Column Volume 6, June 1998 1. How has Commerce Business Park grown over the past 5 years in terms of physical space and permit value? Since January 1995, 38 new commercial buildings have been permitted in Commerce Business Park. The value of these building permits exceeds $7,551,000, and accounts for over 355,900 square feet of new commercial space. The first two buildings in Commerce Business Park were permitted in 1986 and 1988. Recent research indicates 55 businesses are operating in this park, with employment exceeding 590 full and part-time employees. 2. What is Southlake's overall policy on tax incentives? On October 6. 1992, City Council passed and approved a resolution addressing economic development incentives. The resolution reads as follows. "The City of Southlake is committed to the development of high quality commercial growth. The City will on a case by case basis consider granting incentives to stimulate economic growth. Southlake would be interested in considering tax abatements or other incentives based on the increased value added to a specific site by a specific development proposal that meets the City's goals." 3. What is the Goods in Transit Freeport Exemption? This tax exemption is granted on certain goods, ware, ores, and other tangible personal property that is forwarded out of Texas within 175 days of its acquisition or importation into Texas. This exemption only applies to property for the purpose of assembly, storage, manufacturing. processing or fabricating as provided under Tax Code Section 11.251 and the Texas Constitution. Entities seeking this exemption must apply and demonstrate compliance with all guidelines. Eligible property is described under Article VIII, Section 1-j, of the Texas Constitution. and the constitutional amendment authorizing this exemption was adopted in rnip 1989. Tarrant County also offers this exemption county-wide. { NEWS CLIPPING Source: Fort Worth Star-Telegram DATE: July 9, 1998 C Mi Cocina expands p Hulen, Southiake sites BY WORTH WREN JR. Galleria and the Fort Worth-'--: star-Tddesram Staff Wnter Sundance locations, said Todd.:: FORT WORTH — Mi Blankenship, spokesman for Cocina, the six-unit Tex-Mex Dallas-based M Crowd Restau- ::_ restaurant chain that scored a hit rant Group. in downtown's Sundance M Crowd is the owners'''• : Square. is planning its second administrative umbrella for Mi -- Fort Worth location, as well as a Cocina and Mainstream Fish's Southiake site. House. The Mainstream chain is -.- The 3000 S. Hulen St. loca- scheduled to open a restaurant at-'- tion will be a 4,200-square-foot 301 Main St. in downtown Fort free-standing part of the Trinity Worth next week. It has two ,. Commons Phase II shopping Dallas-area locations. • center development and near the "Fort Worth is a great town. new. Charleston's restaurant. Blankenship said. The Southiake Town Center The first Mi Cocina opened site will cover 5,000 square feet. in Dallas in 1991. Its Tarrant Both outlets are part of the County debut came in April - Dallas-based company's accel- 1995. . crated expansion, which also At Trinity Commons, Mi includes September openings: Cocina will join Charleston's for a Mi Cocina in Richardson and Tom Thumb supermarket. _ and the first out-of-state loca- Blankenship said the neighbor- tion. in Kansas City, said Ray hood looks very promising for ,r- Was .burne, one of the investors the restaurant, which will stand and a private real estate devel- alone under a big pecan tree and open be part of a mini-restaurant row. The anticipated January or Construction is expected to • February openings in Fort Worth begin within 60 days. The South: and Southiake will be the 7- Hulen project's basic construc year-old chain's second and tion cost, excluding real estate. third restaurants in Tarrant and equipment, was estimated at _ County and ninth and 10th in $250,000 in the city building • the chain. permit. Business is good at all six current locations, but sales are Worth Wren Jr.(317)390-7721 ' especially strong at the Dallas worth@star-te(egram.com C YEWS CLIPPING Source: Fort Worth Star-Telegram DATE: July 2, 1998 ce, Family finds bus mess, •leasure at home Southlake residents are Gourmet at Home focuses on profiting in more ways catering upscale business lun- "What we can do that x cheons for clients such as Chase bigger businesses than one from a Bank of Texas and Merrill Lynch. gg gourmet foods and gift The Rumplers also deliver gift cannot is make baskets venture. baskets that cost $40 to$80 and whatever the customer include cheese, salsa and other . BY ELLENA FORTNER items. wants. If they want >a Special to the Star-Telegram `I "What we can do that bigger grilled chicken, we grill SOU'THLAKE—The Rum- oc .:4 pler family started out with an businesses cannot is make what- -.chicken.A person can -' idea for a shop. But they ended ever the customer wants," said call and say, 'I want a up going in the opposite direction Carol Rumpler, who prepares the —a home-based business called food. "If they want grilled nice $75 basket,'and Gourmet at Home. chicken, we grill chicken.A per- we can make it." son can call and say, `I want a , "At first, the business concept nice $75 basket,' and we can . —Carol Rumpler • centered around getting a shop make it." Gourmet at Home built and having gourmet food to (...- go," said Ron Rumpler, president The concept for the business of the company. began to evolve in April when "When the construction on the Ron Rumpler, who worked at "There is a large, pretty much shop kept getting delayed, we Kraft General Foods for 25 years, untapped market right now for switched over to catering and gift noticed that people were ea ling food that is well-made,"Tim baskets." out more but were hungerin fo g r Rump ler said. a home-cooked meal. "We make all our food from The switch appears to have paid off. According to Texas Restaurant scratch and do not serve anything Association, almost half of that we would not put on our own The Rumplers—Ron and his restaurant food is take out, with table." Wife, Carol. and their sons consumers eating 61 percent In addition to financial Stephen, 15,Andy, 18, and Tim, more take out today than in 1989. rewards, the business has pro- 20—are delivering about four .j baskets a week and are catering Take out from businesses mar- vided the family the opportunity _ two to three business luncheons a keting "home-cooked meals"has to spend time together. day. increased 36 percent since 1992. "I get to see my dad more, and C my parents are happier,"said Stephen Rumpler, who delivers'7i advertising fliers on in-line skates. "Plus, I get a little money." The curse of the entrepreneur —long hours and little pay— has been avoided for the most part, Carol Rumpler said. "My time is flexible,"she said.,; "If I want to make baskets at •`_'', night,I can.And there is no one' there telling me otherwise." The family already is gearing-. 1 up for Christmas, working with a= coffee roaster to create a - Gourmet at Home blend. Although the family has not ruled out opening a shop, they're planning to continue as a home based business for the time being, expanding the catering and gift basket sides of the business. "We are going to give people what they want," Ron Rumpler said. "We may have slimmed down what we were originally thinking,but that enables us to:do a few things very well,instead o f many things just OK." C NEWS CLIPPING Source: Dallas Business Journal DATE: Week of July 3-9. 1998 kFACETIME A look at movers and shakers of the Metroplex—and what makes them tick. Om*. g�s ■Philosophy:Find something you like Pamela Fagan doing and do it. Life is too precious to be wasted on jobs you don't like.Less Fagan, 31, is principal and president money is worth more satisfaction. -• of InterActive Training Solutions,a South- ■ Greatest challenge: Learning how lake-based employment practices con- to sell`myself. That's not something suiting company. they teach in business or law school. ■Family:My husband,Dan,and I work You just don't learn about how and together. We have been married for six where to market yourself.I learned that lope years and have a 2-year-old son named no one`else could do that forme.We Clark and a 1 year-0Id daughter named say that in the first year,we succeeded Samantha. despite ourselves. ■ Hometown and childhood: I grew ■Career Inspiration:I fell in love with up in Amarillo. training during my last year in law • Education: I graduated from Texas school.I was a teaching assistant in the legal research and writing program. If A&M University. My degree was in busi- you love training on that topic,then you ness analysis with a focus on manage- really love training. ment information systems.I also have a law degree from The University of Texas. II Pet peeves: People that don't take • Hobbies: Obsessive reading. Also responsibility seriously. I don't have a scuba diving, backpacking and snow lot of tolerance for people that don't take initiative. skiing.Anything with my family. —Ian McCann ■ First job:My first job was at McDon- aid's.I lasted three weeks before I con- vinced my parents to let me quit and get a job at a movie theater concession stand. My parents said 'Get out the door and get a job,' and I did. ■ Ukes to read: Suspense and mys- teries are my favorite,but I will read any- thing I can get my hands on. ■Role models:First and foremost,my parents.They have a strong,loving mar- riage,which is a great inspiration to my husband and me. Also, my father (000, imbued me with the entrepreneurial spirit. He started his own business when he was 30 years old. PAGE 14 TIIE BUSINESS PRESS WEEK OF JULY 3.1998 Tarrant County's largest environmental contractors Raul ed b7 number of Tarrant County employees • Plc el No.el Ncensed Revenge',year (1111.1Tarrant professionals stall established in Top.tine Rant Companyname.addrns, bane,yes,a-malt,web see employees ou staff T Coue Clientele type local emothe Sample of services Ph7P p Drees I Berlins Inc Industrial.transportation Full-service ernwormseetal:studies(EAs.E15),condition 3Bt0 Nulen St.,Fen Werth 76107 fl IB.S agartle.,legal firms. on,w Nam' assessmens.storm water management.permitting,hazardous 1- 470 lu in Tarrant Steve Veal, 175.6000,lox 735.6148 minion r/1939 municipal,state federal, waste remediation,underground storagetank rerrnernd and web site www.C-I.cem land development Jean Cook closure.wastewater system design Freese and Nichols Int. $24.4 minion Municipal,land develop- Environmental permitting and assessments.compliance audits. 2. 4055 International Plaza Wertow.Ns.too,Fort Werth 76109 I% 79 O .II,1997/ mint,industrial.state. Robert L. remedial on.waste management.water/wastewater 735-7300.fan 735-7491.web site www.lreese.c.w 1894 federal,military Herchert treatment and engineering design Eagle Ceestr.ction I Environmental Services Inc. P.O.gee 161704.9104 N,S,287 N,W., fly mliNon/ Industrial,oil and gas. Butch Full-service environmental contractor,emergency response. 3. Fort worth 76161 103 12 1991 government. remedlaoon,confuteng,liquefied and compressed gas transfers. 847.1333,ran 147./714 transportation .. OSHA training,demolition.waste transportation and deposal EMCON 5701 E.base.1120 S,.Fort Werth 76119 Irsdusmal,oil and gas. Kenneth EiwironmenW consuhmg,engineering and construction. 4. 170.1251,Ina 170.00y1 SS 13 DND/1980 government Wekh i vestigatnsrn:studies including analytical services: web site wwwamcouinc.nm design:operations and construction Industrial.fkpncial.real G Envirensnee W Services Inc estate. Emergency response to hazardous materials releases. 5. 3919 California Parkway L.fort Worth 76119 A 9 DND/l9% transportation. J Selzer oil spill cleanup.site renedlatIon.deposal,labor support f7S-7122 gwe^n^enul training.project management Talon Inc.6. 3 730S6-IWi rloeaad 7way-9/.0rt Worth 76101 33 4 $2.3,,,akaa Industrial.municipal,real Analytical laborate ry•field services(sample collection). 1976 elate,legal,agonn,,ral J.R.Coolidge engineering,project management,consulting:testing services, e-mail talem@aireall.eet wastewater,storm weer,sae,shidge,hazardous waste • Alan Plummer Associates Int. Msae<palde,local gabs and CMVenviroomend engineering services related to water 7 75I4 Mosier Meer Court federal regulatory No.100.Fort Worth 76118 31 19 DND/19n fe al agenda, Alan H. treatment and dbaibklon.wastewater collection and •. 10/.1714,lea 589-0071 water*etas.we. Pluni ner Jr. treatment,water resource de+elopnem,germ water web site apeleoinsn saoitlu.private disnts management.water reclamation,and p.mduksg GMD Environmental Systems Inc Manufacturer of emirorwnenal equipment specifically for air P.O.Boa 11375.Fort Worth 76110 20-25 I SS m ilion/1983 IndustrialG s lorry' pollutionreclrcontrol(bag bones).solid waste recycling ns.g sanical 8. Reer eClanrtipn of clay bonded and mixed sand.mned,anni<al 916.9291,fan 923.0035 recamaaan for chemically bonded sand) Sand Trap Service Co.Inc. and disposal 8. 1300 Cold Springs Mad,Fort Werth 76101 20 0 DND/1949 Service Gary Beavers transporting °f liquid 877•5100,lu 119-9079 grease traps.grit traps and nonhazardous waste Epa<t Strokes Inc. Full-service environmental including site assessments. 01 Stadium Dive,No.IOC Arlington 76011 17 12 OND/1992 Industrial•financial,legal, Peter Baldwin permitting,rernedlation,risk assessment, owrnfields. 1 0•161-9500,lea 277.1221 pipeline,real estate hazardous waste management web site www.epact.<om ate Environmental Managers Inc. Industrial,government- Ned K. Voluntary cleanup projects.underground storage 11.1022 W.L Ise.,Fort Worth 76107 IS 6 DND/1983 tank site dosure,air pollution emission, 870.2017,fax 177 1854 banking Burleson environmental site assessments phase 1.11,111 Rene Engineers Inc. Full-service environmental engineering services:environmental 11.Ill N.Rayner•Fart Werth 76111 S3.5 meson/ Industrial,state.private. Charles M. sued..,s,,n.m.nre.m sl1.6211,I..Bl1-IB33 I S 7 1972 awe financial Jackson a agement,pre m bung,baaaree m warm t-mail g@aetum remedia[ion,underground storage tank removal and closure GEO Exploration Service loc. f1.2 Nonhazardous Nonhazardn waste management.24-hour service. 13.2355 0 Ave.,Fort Werth 76106 11 2 1991 Oiland gas,industrial Steve come all solids and liquids"recycled 625.6971,lea 625.2037(11111"' _ David Cornish I Cs. Railroad.industrial. Full-service environmentalcastruction contractors.project • 1675 Rogers Road,fort Werth 16107 fnancial,real mate.erg and • gee ant.imtallatiodremoval of underground/above-ground 14.338-1052,lass 371-OIU i3 5 DNDI1979 m governmental.reail. C ndy Conish m storage tanks,r mdat tM<bsure of PS,RCRA-CERCU web site wnew.flash.net/-cernBh private sector facilities,compliance audits,site assessments 0 Environmental Hazardous and nonhazardous waste disposal,distributor of 15.3211 hind Parkway,Arlington 76011 12 5 $3 wl0iorl981 --"Llhviranmental Jos Calderon industrial solvents and chlorinated sohena 640-6017,las 633.6834 I Trirental Inc. $2 1 million Gas station construction.installation and removal 1 5.5221 kaltenbrun Read,Fort Werth 76132 12 3 1993 Oil and gas Larry Wood of snnderg.ound storage tanks.EPA compliance 561•6601.561'-4876 Unified Strokes of Tessa Inc. Governmental.commercial, Removal,installation.cathodic protection,upgrading and testing 1110 Greenbrlar Drive.feuthlake 76092 S1,8 million/ fie'n D. 12 5 industrial.financial. of USA and ASV remedial construction services:compliance • •1/1.9510,fax 4ee-1729 1991 Hill e-mail unifledser@ael.cem real elate audits,environmental site assessments Gene Hill Equipment Co.Inc..dba The Hill Co. Industrial,financial, P0.ser , orth 76113 10 7 53.5 millimillion/ ,governmental, $ i Hill HillDesign,installation.removal.upgrade and remediation I O.535.5100.a2911 lea S31-FortUWI9 1915 commercialof fuel and chemical storage tank systems web site http://ensersices.cem/011-429-1171 professional.retail Southern Eeelre Te<hnolegy Inc. .- Complete waste management including technical writing,training RO.sex 1003,Graperiee 76099 10 3 f1.S million/ All types no classification.profiling.sampling.arrangement.and site manage- 18.379.1070,lea 779-1101 1991Morrissey most for transport and disposal on behalf of client e-mail setl@unicensp.net TT1 Environmental Lab Its Government, 18,2117 Arlington Dawns Road.Arlington 76011 10 3 $500,000/1988 environmental,industrial. *mar Parley In-house,fun-service,independent environmental 861-5322.las 261.1717 and analytical testing laboratory web site www.tti.com construction DIG Specialties Inc. Financial,government. Installation of underground storage tanks:general contractor . 21.2140 Michael Drive.foethlabe,76091 9 4 DNDl1998 commercial Darr Gibson and designer of service stations/convenience stores 379.0313,fax 431.4007 Aztec Environmental IBI6 U.S.777 f.,fart Wer[h 76116 Industrial,commercial,real D.Keith Full range of asbestos and lead consulting and testing: 22.211.9393,/a 111.9100 7 2 DND/1992 estate,government Dalton indoor air quality testing e-mail dkdalton@atteceeeironmental.com Ben soothe&eeeeciates Inc. Economic consulting for regional.domestic or international 226715 Camp Bowie sled.,Fort Worth 76116 7 4 DND/1990 Financial,law.business! Ben Boothe institutions,particularly academic and banking institutions; .730.9595,Sae 770-7773 land/property owners environmental and appraisal services web site www.idgreep.com/b_beethe Law Engineering and Environmental Services Inc. .Industrial,financial,real 212 W Exchange,Fort Werth 76106 7 3 1275.000/1992 estate,oil and Douglas L' Engineering and environmental services 22.710.1177,far 710.1629 gas. Smith e-mail law.ftworth.oiflce@internetrnsi.cem government,commercial Roberts/gchonick 1 Associates 232.15 E.Randal MHI Road,Ne.34,Arlington 76011 6 I fit rrdllordl9% Industrial,printing/ SnMth Full-service em sn iraenW engineering.cawulting services;engineering. 5.640.6407,fax 640.6617 - packaging,ea and gas Gw.)' hydrogeolope ask,regulatory compliance,health and safety web site www,rsa-..vir..e.m - NOTES:Wright Pup Co.Inc..Ne'14 on fart yens list,did not respond by press vine. Source:The companies -neremie Inc 12 month ended Mach 31. '-Corporate agave. Researcher.Valerie E.Rome ONO-did not disclose CITY'S WATER STORAGE TANK NAMED A L, 1997 STEEL TANK OF THE YEAR! :2GYf1J+-`:awe-m•-•v':.> e- t..aa Ys.3N[i°tR✓•'wRiV.R:ii.'- "-aFA.,.,T- ... NC••FF'yr�rl x ° ors. - <e3 4,Y N iw; .-I (Ilie? .. Ar *}a i' -.. r, �Y-� .n The City's five million gallon water storage tank, located at the northeast corner of Southiake Boulevard and Pearson Lane, has been named a 1997 Steel Tank of the Year by the Steel Plate Fabricators Association. You are invited to attend the awards ceremony on: Tuesday, July 21 4:30 p.m. (.., Water Tank Site City of South lake Duthl - Administrative Offices FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JULY 14, 1998 Mayor. Rick Stacy Contact: Tracy Southers Mayor Tern: Public Information Officer W.Ralph Evans 817/481-5581 ext. 819 Deputy Mayor Pro Tem: Scott F.Martin Counalmembers: Wayne Moffat CITY'S WATER STORAGE TANK NAMED A Ronnie Kendall G Edmondson Gary Fawks 1997 STEEL TANK OF THE YEAR City Manager. Curtis E.Hawk SOU HL.AKE,Texas --The City of Southlake's five million gallon ground water Assistant City Manager. rna K.Yelverton storage tank,located at the northeast corner of F.M. 1709 and Pearson Lane, was Lary: tiro L. LeGrand named a 1997 Steel Tank of the Year by the Steel Plate Fabricators Association (SPFA). The award will be presented at a ceremony on Tuesday,July 21, at 4:30 p.m. at the tank site. Southlake's five million gallon ground water storage tank was completed and turned on September 10, 1997.The tank features 20 rolled-channel arches and bent- plate pilasters, and a seal-welded roof plate.The project was finished on schedule and saved the city$700,000 compared to a tank built of another material.The tank was fabricated by Tank Builders,i4 of Euless,Texas. SPFA honored three water storage tanks and eight petrochemical tanks.To qualify,a tank had to be plac&d'in service during 1997. SPFA is a North American trade association representing fricators of steel products including water tanks, Cie water pipelines,pressure vessels, and a wide range of industrial applications. • ### 1725 East Southiake Blvd. . Southiake,Texas 76092 _ (817)481-5581 • FAX(817)329-1747 .wu Iry IA,APPrIRTI INrry FLUX AVFD. City of Southlake Duthlak_ Administrative Offices FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JULY 14, 1998 Mayor Rick Stacy Contact Tracy Southers Maya Pro Tem: Public Information Officer W.RalPl'Evans (817) 481-5581 ext. 819 Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: Scott F.Martin BRUMLOW AVENUE CLOSED TO ALL THRU TRAFFIC Wayne oie Moffat FOR TWO WEEKS, BEGINNING JULY 20 Debra Edmondson Gary Fawks City Manager. SOUTHLAKE,Texas-- Brumlow Avenue,from Highway 26 to Curtis E.Hawk Assistant City Manager: Continental Boulevard,will be closed to all thru traffic beginning July 20, 1998. -Shona K.Yelverton $ecretary: r Construction crews will be working from 6:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. to reconstruct ra L.LeGrand the portion of Brumlow Avenue from Highway 26 to just north of Mid-Cities Ready Mix. The City of Southlake and Tarrant County began reconstructing and realigning Brumlow Avenue in May to meet the new South Carroll Avenue at Continental Blvd. Previously,the road had been closed to all traffic Monday through Friday,7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. I ### L. 1725 East Southlake Blvd. . Southlake,Texas 76092 _ (817)481-5581 . FAX(817)329-1747 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYF_R- 1") s JU3998 i JUL �� REGIONAL REVIEW NOTICE 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan °FFt' ; crR'Y For North Central Texas IL July 1998 1 , tC During the past year, NCTCOG has continued to address many key issues pertaining to water quality management. As the designated water quality management planning agency, NCTCOG has responsibility for developing annual plans for regional water quality management activities. This plan has been developed under guidance from NCTCOG's Water Resources Council. This year's Plan includes the comprehensive 2020 ReVIEW of Wastewater Service Needs that was prepared in 1996 and the Nonpoint Source Loadings information of last year. Updated information on wastewater service and the State's list of impaired waters in our region have been added. Enclosed is the Regional Overview and Methodology section of the draft 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas. This section provides historical background on the areawide planning process, as well as an overview of the findings and the methodologies used in the 2020 ReVIEW of Wastewater Service Needs and the Nonpoint Source Loadings. The remainder of the document is comprised of 12 detailed assessments of the major watersheds in the region. The entire document is available for downloading from the NCTCOG web site at http://www.dfwinfo.com/envir/wq/wtrpin/. A response form is included with this notice for purposes of obtaining additional sections of the Annual Plan, or if needed, the entire Plan, in a variety of formats. Federal regulations specify that the draft plan will be made available for regional review and recommendation to local governments that have responsibility for, or are directly affected by the plan. If no comment is received from a local government, a favorable recommendation shall be assumed. During this review period, citizens and organizations are also encouraged to contribute comments and recommendations. A special panel of the NCTCOG Water Resources Council will conduct a public hearing to receive testimony concerning the draft 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan: on: Thursday, August 6, 1998 at: 1:30 p.m. in: NCTCOG Offices Centerpoint Two, Second Floor 616 Six Flags Drive Arlington, Texas 76011 Following the public hearing, the 1998 Annual Plan will be considered by the NCTCOG Water Resources Council at its August 13, 1998 meeting, and recommended to the NCTCOG Executive Board for adoption and submittal to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. Please forward any written comments prior to the public hearing to Samuel Brush, NCTCOG ktior Department of Environmental Resources, or call [METRO] (817) 695-9210 if there are any questions regarding the 1997 Annual Plan. If you plan to attend the public hearing and have a disability that requires special arrangements,please contact Nancy Pascale,NCTCOG, 72 hours prior to the public hearing at(817)695-9216. Reasonable accommodation will be made to assist your needs. REVIEW DRAFT --�. environmental strategies �� (re Niry REGIONAL OVERVIEW AND METHODOLOGY A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Review Draft _(...„, North Central Texas Council of Governments July 1998 During1997 9ft,NGTCQG'Department at Environmental esour and it environmentalw „ (ow, advisory comm tees.prepared`a series ofregio al watershed assessmer for tonb -4 10 NCTC 's Executive Board This document is a e of thirteen ttonsal cis be A ; 1998 Anne afer ua ageme , f � x .l through a pit wren f i exas ra Resou " ` ® W, provisionsHof Section 0S ection 6t4(b)f wFederal Cleat ilaterA ThissR ew,g, raft was apFr v forregional re w by NCTC 's.WatertResaurces' c 1.A rubli ar g ll be:heldA theN,p7TCOG©ft es of 4140ust.6 99$to recenre esti on concermn .i,A wA Ai. -document x eontact:Sam B sh at 81 . 695-921awith uestions ���b N • REVIEW DRAFT L This page intentionally left blank L L REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies co„, Table of Contents Section Page 1. Regional Overview and Methodology A. Implementation of the Upper Trinity River Basin 1 Comprehensive Sewerage Plan, 1970 - 1990's B. Three-Step Review of Wastewater Service Needs, 1990.- 2020 11 C. Overview of Population and Flow Projections for the Upper 13 Trinity Basins D. Methodologies for Determining Planning Status 16 E. Methodologies for Estimating Nonpoint Source Loadings 21 F. Nonpoint Source Loadings — Summary 26 G. State of Texas 1996 303(d) Listed Stream Segments 30 H. Appendix A. North Central Texas Wastewater Service and 35 Population Projections I• 43 Appendix"B. 1997 Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Data Watershed Assessments 2. Arlington and Benbrook Reservoir Watershed 3. Eagle Mountain and Lake Worth Reservoir Watershed 4. Grapevine Reservoir Watershed 5. Joe Pool Reservoir Watershed 6. Lewisville Reservoir Watershed 7. Lower East Fork Watershed 8. Lower Elm Fork Watershed (kr.- 9. Mid-Cities Watershed A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-1 REVIEW DRAFT L 10. Trinity Mainstem Watershed 11. Upper East Fork Reservoirs Watershed 12. West Trinity Forks Watershed 13. White Rock Lake Watershed L L Page 1-2 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT —� environmental strategies L SECTION 1 . REGIONAL OVERVIEW AND METHODOLOGY A. Implementation Of The Upper Trinity River Basin Comprehensive Sewerage Plan, 1970 - 1990's Wastewater service is an integral part of the infrastructure support for the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area. For such a densely populated and growing area, the provision of adequate treatment services is important, with social, economic, environmental and health benefits to the region's 4.5 million residents. Proper wastewater treatment, whether accomplished through a large and sophisticated municipal collection and treatment system or a small, on-site septic tank, is often taken for granted. Years of planning and a continuing process of redesign and upgrading have provided the infrastructure and facilities capable of handling the region's wastewater. This document reviews the priorities established in the 1970 Upper Trinity River Basin Comprehensive Sewerage Plan, as amended (UTRBCSP). The UTRBCSP is the "original" long-range regional plan for this area and was developed by NCTCOG and its consultants with co, community input from 1969 to 1971. The 1971 Plan recommended a comprehensive areawide wastewater facilities system, a program of interceptor sewers, and wastewater treatment facilities in much of the 21-county, 11,000 square mile area of the Upper Trinity River basin. Many of these recommendations for the 1970 to 1990 time period have been implemented. Management agencies to provide wastewater collection and treatment services in the urbanized portion of the region have been designated by the state upon NCTCOG's recommendation. The joint wastewater systems have expanded from 224 million gallons per day (MGD) combined capacity in 1970 to 651 MGD in 1995, almost a 300% increase to serve the growing urban complex. Yet, as the metropolitan area grows to near 6 million people by the year 2020, continued attention to meeting the wastewater service needs is necessary. One purpose of this review of the UTRBCSP is to assess the progress of implementation of the plan through 1990, and to review and as necessary, amend the plan for 1990 to 2020 to meet future service needs in the designated planning area based on NCTCOG's newest population and employment forecasts. History of the UTRBCSP (1970-1990's) The Upper Trinity River Basin Comprehensive Sewerage Plan (UTRBCSP), as amended, was developed from 1969 to 1971 by NCTCOG and its consultants with substantial community input. At that time, key elements of the plan focused on the provision of adequate wastewater service to most of the urbanized portions of Dallas and Tarrant counties. The plan proposed a regionalized system, where selected joint systems would be expanded, or new treatment plants built to serve the growing population in North Central Texas. The plans also outlined improvements to the system of major interceptors serving the region, either through extension or capacity expansions. The plan called for the phase out of numerous smaller municipal and private facilities, with diversion to the joint treatment facilities. For many of the smaller A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-3 REVIEW DRAFT L communities located at the perimeter of the urbanized area or beyond, independent community systems were suggested. In 1971, the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the Governor of Texas formally endorsed the "Upper Trinity River Basin Comprehensive Sewerage Plan." It was the first regional plan in the nation approved by the new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the regional planning provisions (Section 3c) of the 1965 Federal Water Quality Act. Commitment to Joint Wastewater Systems Two components of the recommended wastewater facilities program of the UTRBCSP, as amended, consisted of: 1. Joint Systems of treatment works, to serve primarily Dallas and Tarrant Counties; and 2. Individual publicly-owned treatment plants for outlying communities in the remainder of the basin. Three methods of recommended actions concerning the joint systems, included: 1. Enlargement of the capacity of the joint system plants to meet future anticipated flow increases; 2. Extension of interceptors, primarily in Dallas and Tarrant Counties, to phase out smaller public and private treatment plants and to serve growing areas; and 3. Upgrading treatment levels to meet stringent discharge limits. Three stages for the implementation of the wastewater facilities for the metropolitan area were: 1. Initial by 1975; 2. Future Stage 1 by 1990, such that within the 20-year planning period (1970-90) the basic system for the metropolitan area would be functioning; and 3. Future Stage 2 by 2020, principally relief sewers and expansion to treatment facilities (no new plants) as required by the area's growth. A 2020 reVIEW of the UTRBCSP was conducted for the 1995 Annual Water Quality Management plan. It's purpose was to assess the progress of implementation of the plan through 1990, and to review and as necessary, amend the plan for 1990 to 2020 to meet future service needs in the designated planning area based on NCTCOG's 1995 population and employment forecasts. In the UTRBCSP, as amended, joint systems were defined as the publicly-owned treatment works designated to collect and treat wastewater from two or more incorporated systems for the metropolitan area and included: • Fort Worth Village Creek joint system, with the Village Creek plant and associated interceptor sewers. Page 1-4 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies fr.f...L • Trinity River Authority Central joint system and Ten Mile Creek joint system. • Dallas joint system, including the Dallas Central (formerly Dallas and White Rock) and Dallas Southside plants. • East Fork joint system, consisting of the Plano Rowlett, Duck Creek and Mesquite plants plus recommended new plants in Rockwall and in the Seagoville-Crandall area. The UTRBCSP Recommendations Focused on the Urbanized Metropolitan Area • / e ' • / CITJ MNNEY PRINCETO I\ 'OS ii Cle '......„,,,47 / I — LEWISyLLE �\ �/ 1 \ 1 \—— J PLANO I / WY E 1 ` ,� •S . TARRANT COUNTY ` Tr T 1^ DALLAS COUNTY _ ..——————— 'IP RICHARDSpV tROCKWALL KELLER GRADEVI E ROW I AZLE • / 11 GARLAN. _ SAGINAW /. EATH — IIii EULESS IRVING • DALLASar �' DuC 1 :111 , , rp i.I i VILLAGE ` ✓ PLC CREK / •o4 CREEK `1+ MESQUITE f `N. e��f�F 0 R ARUNG-ON WHTrE SOUTH I W O R H 'I \ ROCK , siDE ` BEN BROOK, — e i{ /�— TEA SEAGO TEN-MILE / /% \CEDA HILL CREEK / :• LEY — / , BURLESON LEGEND PLANT —INTERCEPTORS LIMIT OF AREA SERVED BY—_ REGIONAL SYSTEMS L A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-5 REVIEW DRAFT L Designation of Management Agencies Pursuant to the Clean Water Act, the Governor of Texas designated areas of the state for management of water quality and designated local organizations of local governments from each of those areas to develop areawide waste treatment management plans. Under this process, the North Central Texas Council of Governments is the designated water quality planning agency for the Dallas/Fort Worth area. The Texas Water Commission (now the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC)) promulgated a ruling in 1992 which concerns regional wastewater planning and the State's implementation of such plans through the permitting process. This rule is intended to be a tool to encourage community regional planning. With this rule, a community that is developing long-term plans for wastewater service may design a regional wastewater plan with appropriate community input. This plan must then be approved by the area designated planning agency (or by TNRCC if not in a designated area) and then implemented. The community can choose to supply a copy of the regional plan to the TNRCC and can request that the TNRCC consider the regional plan when it is reviewing any type of domestic wastewater permit application. An applicant for a domestic wastewater discharge permit will be required to submit documentation of communication with regional authorities and/or nearby permitted facilities concerning the proposed facility's compliance with the regional plan. The TNRCC envisions this ruling as improving regional planning and water quality management efforts. It will facilitate the tracking of small wastewater facilities by designated planning agencies such as NCTCOG. In 1973 the Management and Finance Program of the UTRBCSP investigated in detail eight organizational alternatives for operating the recommended wastewater systems. The t alternatives ranged from a private corporation to a regional multi-purpose government. The institutional arrangement that was recommended and has been implemented over the past two decades is the "Coordinated Joint System" approach. At the local level, each joint system operator formed a customer council(s) of cities which it serves. NCTCOG's Water Resources Council consists of representatives from these joint system agencies and their customer councils, plus several region-at-large members. As the designated planning agency, NCTCOG has responsibility for recommending cities or other entities to be designated to manage treatment and/or collection systems. The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission is the state agency responsible for actual designation of management agencies. Cities or other entities recommended by NCTCOG must submit a designation statement to the TNRCC before they can officially be designated by the State. Designation is required in order for an entity to be eligible for federal grants and loans for wastewater projects. Current Status of the UTRBCS Plan The primary recommendations of the Upper Trinity River Basin Comprehensive Sewerage Plan, as amended, have been accomplished over the past two decades. These include the designation of management agencies, plant phase outs, the move toward joint treatment systems, joint system enlargements and interceptor extensions. However, unforeseen growth patterns have resulted in some wastewater service which is different from the UTRBCSP recommendations. L Page 1-6 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies t.r.N.L (11620, Summary of Treatment Plant Phase Outs • 13 Municipal Plants Were Recommended to be Phased Out • 24 Municipal Plants Have Been Phased Out • 1 Private Plant Was Recommended to be Phased Out • 14 Private Plants Have Been Phased Out Movement toward Joint Treatment Systems There are six agencies which have been formally designated to construct, operate and maintain treatment plants and associated interceptors to serve two or more incorporated communities. These joint system operators are the cities of Dallas, Denton, Fort-Worth and Garland; the North Texas Municipal Water District; and the Trinity River Authority of Texas. The formation of the Upper Trinity Regional Water District and the Collin County Regional Water Authority has resulted in the addition of new regional entities with possible responsibilities for water and wastewater planning. No formal request for designation of the Collin County Regional Water Authority for collection or joint treatment has yet been submitted to NCTCOG. The Upper Trinity Regional Water District was recommended for collection and treatment in the 1995 Water Quality Management Plan. (har As of January 1, 1996, there are 70 incorporated cities and agencies which are served by j oint systems, including Grapevine which is partly served by a joint system and partly by its own community treatment works. In 1970, the joint systems served 35 cities. Since the joint system operators do not in all cases have responsibility for interceptors and collection facilities, the customer cities have been designated for the construction, operation and maintenance of interceptors and collection lines within their own jurisdictional boundaries. With the exception of Grapevine, the customer cities are not presently designated for treatment plant construction, operation or maintenance. Community Treatment Works -- Certain cities have been designated to own and operate their own community treatment plant and collection lines. Each city normally serves only its own jurisdiction, or in some cases a portion of a contiguous city. In the Upper Trinity River Basin, there are 85 cities with their own treatment works. This is 2 more than the 83 plants which were in existence in 1970. While many plants in the urbanized portions of the area were phased out and diverted to joint systems, new community plants have also been established in response to growth in more rural areas. Cities With No Public Service -- In the Upper Trinity River Basin, there are at least 50 incorporated cities and thousands of square miles of unincorporated areas with no public wastewater service. Since 1970, many cities have been extended service or built their own community treatment works. In Dallas and Tarrant Counties there are few incorporated communities without at least partial public service. Individual Dischargers -- These are the remaining permit holders who do not provide public service to incorporated communities. This includes both individual domestic dischargers such as mobile home parks, isolated schools, small businesses, and water treatment plants and A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-7 REVIEW DRAFT L individual industrial dischargers including process waters and storm water permits. Although a number of private sewage treatment facilities were phased out as recommended by the UTRBCSP, as amended, an even larger number have been permitted by the state during the past two decades. Local governments have raised concern about this issue and these concerns will be addressed later in this section. The map on the following page portrays the locations of all the joint treatment systems and the major community treatment facilities (> 5 MGD) in the north central Texas region. Joint System Treatment Plants Have Been Enlarged Since 1970, every joint system plant has undergone capital improvements and enlargement of treatment capacity. The capacity of the joint systems combined, as of July 1, 1995 is 651 MGD. This compares to the total of 224 MGD for the joint systems in 1970. Thus, the permitted treatment capacity has increased by almost 300% over the past two decades at the cost of many hundreds of millions of dollars. Expansions have kept pace with demand, although periods of extremely wet weather sometimes cause excursions above a plant's permitted capacity. While selected plants have experienced overflows, the average monthly flow for the joint system plants taken as a group was within the permitted flow limits during the early 1970's. However, throughout the mid-70's the joint system flows increased while the plants were undergoing construction and, consequently, permitted flow limits were exceeded more often. (havi• Alternative Plans for Selected Community Facilities As the region approached the 1990 planning horizon for the UTRBCSP, as amended, some of the future conditions that were the basis for the original planning efforts have not transpired, or have been substantially changed. In addition, the new unforeseen growth in areas beyond the original urban metropolitan area has resulted in several regional studies that explore alternatives for service in these areas. This new round of planning is especially important since the UTRBCSP, as amended, assumed limited growth in the perimeter counties and therefore proposed service through small community treatment works only. New information on growth patterns and service needs for these areas has brought about the need for wastewater service planning similar to that performed for the 1970 urbanized areas through the UTRBCSP, as amended. The following brief descriptions highlight those facilities which have gone in directions beyond those of the 1970 UTRBCSP's recommendations. (or Page 1-8 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies r'LL .„„,_,,,_ L Joint Regional Systems and Major Community Treatment Works In North Central Texas 1,----- LEWISVILLE 13■ RESERVOIR �` McKINNEY DENTON RS C9 •C7 RE ER . RESERVOIR J9 „... , C 1? GRAPEVINE • RESERVOIR C3 J8 j DENTON CO. A� 1 • a COLLIN CD ■ C 10 EAGLE' MOUNTAIN ` _ pc8f C2• NA �C6 UKEit RAY HVBR RDVW 3 FORT WORTH J6 t wxrrEROCK •OCL CO. , J10 u� J4 may'*; DALLAS J5 Boundary of t �> ` Designated / (MOUNTAIN JI J7 CREEK Planning LAKE UKE ■J2 ARLINGTON • fille IENBROOK RESERVOIR J i 3 ; d JOE POOI. TA RRANT rQ___ RESERVOIR DA AS CO. -- '- JOHNSON CO. - ELLIS CO. C4 • Jl2 KAUFMAN CO. • Joint Regional Systems • Major Community Treatment Works Plant Code Treatment Plant Plant Code Treatment Plant J1 Dallas Central C1 Flower Mound J2 Dallas Southside C2 Grapevine Peach Street J3 Denton Pecan Creek C3 Lewisville J4 Fort Worth Village Creek C4 Midlothian J5 Garland Duck Creek C5 NTMWD Buffalo Creek J6 Garland Rowlett C6 NTMWD Floyd Branch J7 NTMWD Mesquite C7 Frisco Stewart Creek/NTMWD J8 NTMWD Rowlett C8 NTMWD Rockwall J9 NTMWD Wilson Creek C9 Frisco Stewart Cr.West/NTMWD J10 TRA Central C10 NTMWD Wylie J11 TRA Denton Creek C11 Seagoville/NTMWD J12 TRA Red Oak Creek C12 The Colony MUD#1 J13 TRA Ten Mile Creek C13 Trophy Club MUD L A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-9 REVIEW DRAFT L The Lewisville Prairie Creek plant was originally slated to be phased out, with diversion of flows to TRA Central. The City of Lewisville plans to continue operation of its Prairie Creek plant. Possible roles for this facility were explored in the Denton County Regional Water and Wastewater Study. The Richardson Floyd Branch plant, now owned and operated by the North Texas MWD, was to be phased out according to the UTRBCSP, as amended. Instead, this facility has been expanded to 4.75 MGD and will continue to treat wastewater from a portion of Richardson. Grapevine's Peach Street plant was also on the list of plants to be phased out, but the City of Grapevine has opted to continue use of this facility for service to portions of the municipality, with discharge to Lake Grapevine. Seagoville continued to operate their old 1.2 MGD facility until October 1992 when construction was completed on a new facility. This new facility uses advanced secondary treatment methods which will provide better treatment and continue to serve the growing needs of the City of Seagoville. In May 1994, the city entered into contract with NTMWD Sewer Systems for operation and maintenance services. The Azle and Lakeside facilities were originally slated for diversion to the Fort Worth system by 1990. The extension of interceptors from the Fort Worth system had not (ape reached beyond Lake Worth as of December 31, 1994, and alternatives for service to this area were evaluated through a study initiated by the Tarrant County WCID No. 1 for the Upper West Fork Trinity River/Eagle Mountain Lake area (1990). Among the options still being considered is development of "satellite plants" in this area in lieu of extending interceptors to these areas for connection to the Village Creek joint system. Dallas County Water Control & Improvement District #6 Balch Springs plant was initially targeted for phase out and was shut down in 1989, with flows diverted to the Dallas system. However, they are currently applying for a wastewater permit to upgrade and restart their plant. They intend to expand their facilities to a 3.5 MGD capacity to accommodate anticipated future growth. L Page 1-10 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies (bie B. Three-Step Review of Wastewater Service Needs Goals and Objectives The first objective of this 2020 ReVIEW of wastewater service for North Central Texas was to identify areas which appear to need public wastewater service by the year 2020. NCTCOG demographic forecasts of population and employment were used to identify areas of rapid growth and to target unincorporated areas having sufficient density to warrant wastewater planning. The latest forecast numbers for both 2010 and 2020 were used in this planning effort. The second objective was to identify those agencies necessary to meet the public wastewater service needs through 2020. In most cases, these agencies are already in place serving the public. A review was made of management agency roles by examining existing institutional arrangements and other intergovernmental cooperation issues. Growth areas beyond 1990 service areas which have the potential for needing wastewater service in 2010 and 2020 were assigned for planning purposes to the most appropriate provider. The steps for conducting this assignment will be detailed in the methodology section. The third objective of this 2020 ReVIEW was to identify wastewater planning needs and to describe existing plans, where available, to meet those needs. Needs were identified by evaluating existing wastewater capacity in the light of anticipated service needs derived from population projections. Each wastewater service provider was assigned a status according to its capacity to meet projected flows. Details of this assignment procedure are discussed in the methodology section. Population Projections for the Watershed 1 Wastewater Flows for the Watershed 1 Treatment Works Required to Meet Wastewater Service Needs L A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-11 REVIEW DRAFT L Lewisville Reservoir 1 Grapevine Upper - ___j Reservoir East Fork Lower Reservoirs Lip, Eagle Mtn an i Elm 't: Lake Worth Fork Roc ' eservoirs ake est id-Cities Low•r Trinity East Forks ork Trinity Mainstem Arlington and Benbrook Joe Pool ' eservoirs Reservoir WATERSHEDS OF THE UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN L Page 1-12 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies F.2. (we W C. Overview of Population and Flow Projections for the Upper Trinity Basins Population Overview For planning purposes, the Upper Trinity River Basin has been divided into 12 watersheds. Of these 12 watersheds, the Upper East Fork Reservoirs Watershed is the largest in total square acreage, but only had the 5th greatest residential population in 1990. In 2020, its population is projected to increase 122% making it the third greatest in population. The second largest watershed is the Trinity Mainstem Watershed. In 1990 this watershed had the largest residential population of the 12 watersheds, but in 2020, despite a 14% population increase, it is projected to be exceeded in population by the Mid-Cities watershed. The Lewisville Reservoir Watershed is the third largest in terms of acreage, and has the 8th greatest residential population in 1990. By 2020, this watershed is expected to grow 122%, but it remains the 8th greatest population center. The smallest watershed of the 12 is the White Rock Lake Watershed, although in 1990 this watershed has the 3rd greatest population. By 2020, the White Rock Lake Watershed is the 5th greatest population center, with a 19% population increase from 1990. The most rapidly growing watersheds are the Grapevine Reservoir, Lewisville, and Upper East Fork Reservoirs Watersheds. The population growth in the Grapevine Reservoir Watershed is 239% between 1990 and 2020. The Lewisville and Upper East Fork Reservoirs Watersheds Le are expected to have growths of 122%. These figures reflect the rapid population density increases expected for the areas immediately north of the metroplex. The watershed with the slowest rate of population increase is the Trinity Mainstem Watershed. Between 1990 and 2020, this watershed grows only 14%, reflecting the fact that population density increase is not anticipated for the already heavily urbanized regions of the planning area. For an overview of regional population projections, see Appendix A, p. 1-35. Watershed 1990 Actual Pop. 2010 Projected Pop. 2020 Projected Pop. I Arlington and 126,930 157,405 174,333 I Benbrook Reservoir Eagle Mountain/Lake 47,692 52,279 55,289 Worth Reservoir Grapevine Reservoir 41,771 94,034 141,397 Joe Pool Reservoir 44,427 112,597 146,920 Lewisville Reservoir 136,220 223,165 303,138 Lower East Fork 254,603 315,137 338,973 Lower Elm Fork 343,485 544,821 617,167 Mid-Cities 687,296 880,373 964,822 Trinity Mainstem 800,495 873,381 909,581 Upper East Fork 339,190 616,659 751,770 Reservoirs West Trinity Forks 325,067 424,303 440,225 I. White Rock Lake 502,219 566,447 595,469 Total 3,649,395 4,860,601 5,439,084 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-13 REVIEW DRAFT (ore Watershed Total Square Acres Arlington and Benbrook Reservoir 205,169 Eagle Mountain and Lake Worth 188,164 Reservoir Grapevine Reservoir 220,851 Joe Pool Reservoir 143,198 Lewisville Reservoir 275,189 Lower East Fork 149,867 Lower Elm Fork 142,768 Mid-Cities 212,759 Trinity Mainstem 397,660 Upper East Fork Reservoirs 411,891 West Trinity Forks 188,666 White Rock Lake 63,649 Total 2,599,831 Flow Overview In 1990 and 2020, the Trinity Mainstem and Mid-Cities Watersheds have larger populations than any of the other watersheds. They are also the largest generators of wastewater. Although it has the 6th greatest population in 1990, the West Trinity Forks Watershed has the third greatest flow rate in 1990 and 2010. This may be because of industrial water users in the Fort Worth area. These three watersheds contain the core cities of the metroplex with the greatest amount of industry: Dallas, Arlington/Irving, and Fort Worth. By the year 2020, the flow generation rate of the West Trinity Forks Watershed is exceeded by that of the Upper East Fork Watershed, which is also the third largest population center in 2020. Wastewater generated by a watershed is not necessarily discharged to that watershed. In fact two watersheds, the Lower Elm Fork and West Trinity Forks Watersheds, discharge all of their wastewater to other watersheds. The watersheds that receive the most wastewater in 1990 are the Trinity Mainstem, Mid-Cities and Upper East Fork Watersheds. These watersheds continue to have the greatest amount of wastewater discharged to them through the year 2020. See Appendix B, p. 1-40, for wastewater treatment plant flow rates for 1997. In 1990, 92% of the population in the 12 watersheds planning area had joint system wastewater service. Only 4% of the population had no public service, and 5% had community wastewater service. By 2010, the population with joint system service is expected to decline to 88%, although the number of people with joint system service rises by more than 100,000. The population with no public service rises to 5%, and 7% of the population is expected to have community service. In 2020, the number of people with joint system service rises again, though the population percentage falls to 85. Seven percent of the population will have no public service, and 7% will be served by community treatment works. These changes are explained by the great population increases on the fringes of the metroplex. The joint systems in operation in 1990 primarily served residents of the core of the metroplex: Dallas, Fort Worth, and the mid-cities. The projected 2020 population is expected to establish high residential population densities north of the metroplex, where joint system service did not Page 1-14 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT M environmental strategies f�) (hoe IOW exist in 1990. It is anticipated that new joint systems will be established north of the metroplex in the future, and that populations that are not currently served will receive wastewater treatment from either community or joint systems. 1990 Actual Flow 2010 Projected Flow 2020 Projected Flow Watershed Generated by the Generated by the Generated by the Watershed-(MGD) Watershed (MGD) Watershed (MGD) Arlington and Benbrook 14.91 20.59 20.97 Reservoir Eagle Mountain and 0.73 0.86 0.93 Lake Worth Reservoir Grapevine Reservoir 3.43 7.48 10.26 Joe Pool Reservoir 3.87 15.62 20.94 Lewisville Reservoir 11.21 19.82 23.77 Lower East Fork 33.01 39.72 42.18 Lower Elm Fork 53.09 77.76 86.09 Mid-Cities (TRAC 100.27 129.79 142.06 serving Wrn Arlington) Trinity Mainstem 151.43 163.83 161.07 Upper East Fork 42.2 76.59 90.79 Reservoirs (seWest Trinity Forks 75.01 84.18 84.63 , White Rock Lake 64.92 79.43 81.56 Total 554.08 r 715.67 765.25 - _ 1990 Actual Flow 2010 Projected Flow 2020 Projected Flow Watershed Discharged to the Discharged to the Discharged to the Watershed (MGD) Watershed (MGD) Watershed (MGD) Arlington and Benbrook 0.234 0.29 0.297 . Reservoir Eagle Mountain/Lake 0.735 0.861 0.929 Worth Reservoir Grapevine Reservoir 4.281 10.481 14.115 Joe Pool Reservoir 0.499 0.759 0.93 Lewisville Reservoir 11.473 20.354 24.634 Lower East Fork 34.342 42.228 45.005 Lower Elm Fork 0 0 0 Mid-Cities (TRAC 222.5 292.71 322.39 serving Wrn Arlington) Trinity Mainstem 263.04 291.8 303 Upper East Fork 41.33 83.84 99.28 Reservoirs West Trinity Forks 0 0 0 Le White Rock Lake 2.04 2.19 2.17 Total 580.474 745.513 812.75 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-15 REVIEW DRAFT L D. Methodologies for Determining Planning Status Accounting for Population Growth in Currently Unincorporated Areas NCTCOG's Department of Research and Information Services has projected population growth in the incorporated towns and cities of this region through the year 2020. They also project growth in population densities by traffic survey zones (TSZs) which are not governed by boundaries of incorporation. These population density forecasts have been used in this planning document to enhance population forecasting by accounting for growth in currently undeveloped areas in which significant population densities are predicted and which are currently in unincorporated areas. For wastewater planning purposes the populations of some TSZs not currently within incorporated city boundaries have been added to cities' growth forecasts according to predetermined methodology. If a given TSZ had a population density of greater than one person per acre, and was within a 1990 city boundary, it was assumed that the population of that TSZ would receive wastewater service from the city's current wastewater service provider. If a given TSZ fell outside of a 1990 city boundary, and did not touch any city boundary, or was not linked to any city boundary through another TSZ with population greater than 1 person per acre, then it was assumed that the population of that TSZ did not require immediate wastewater service planning. If, however, a given TSZ touched one or more city boundaries, or was linked to 1 or more city boundaries through another TSZ with a population density of 1 person per acre or greater, than it was assumed that wastewater service planning was required for the population of that TSZ. If that TSZ touched only one city boundary either directly, or through another TSZ with population density of 1 person per acre or greater, then the population of that TSZ was assigned to the city it bordered for planning purposes. The population of that TSZ was assumed to fall subject to the same wastewater service arrangements as the city to which it was assigned. If a given TSZ touched more than 1 city boundary either directly or through another TSZ with a population density of 1 person per acre or greater, and all of the cities it bordered were served by the same joint wastewater treatment service provider, then that TSZ's population was assigned to that wastewater service provider. If a TSZ touched more than 1 city boundary either directly or through another TSZ with a population density of 1 person per acre or greater, and the cities it bordered were not all served by the same joint entity, then the population of that TSZ was assigned to the city with which it shared the longest boundary. If a TSZ touched more than 1 city boundary either directly or through another TSZ with a population density of 1 person per acre or greater, the cities it bordered were not all served by the same joint entity, and the boundaries it shared with each city were equal in length, then the population of that TSZ was assigned to the city as neighboring TSZs. If no neighboring TSZs were assigned to cities, then the population of that TSZ was assigned, by default, to the city it bordered with the largest population. L Page 1-16 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies ,...rfL L Mar Projecting Wastewater Flow Rates through 2020 Assigning the populations of currently unincorporated TSZ's to incorporated cities enhanced population forecasting by accounting for growth in currently undeveloped areas in which significant population densities are predicted. These enhanced population projections became the foundation for projecting future wastewater flows. Two alternative methods of forecasting wastewater flows have been used in this plan to project wastewater flow increases to the joint and community systems from 1990 - 2020. One method uses the same default values for flow rates for all systems to project flow rates. The other uses unique flow rates customized for each system. Both methods are based on actual 1990 flow rates. Using 1990 as a Base Year The base year of 1990 (May to April) was chosen for two reasons. Nineteen-ninety was a census year, so population statistics are highly accurate. Also, 1990 appears to have been a "typical"year for rainfall in the planning area. NOAA has a rainfall gauging station at the Dallas/ Fort Worth Airport Station. Data from 1977 and 1994 shows an annual average rainfall of 32.85 inches at this station. In 1990 (May to April) the annual average rainfall was 33.65 inches. Though monthly averages may vary widely, the annual average in 1990 can be considered typical for the region. Projecting Flow Rates Using Default Values Lire In projecting flows using default values, different flow rates are assumed for residential flow, infiltration, and inflow, and employment flow rates. The residential rate used in these calculations is 80 gpcd, infiltration and inflow is estimated at 40 gpcd, and the employment flow rate used is 30 gpcd. The flow rates for residential populations and infiltration and inflow are national averages based on a survey of 270 Standard Metropolitan Area cities. The employment flow rate is an average of values provided in the City of Dallas and the City of Fort Worth planning documents. Projecting Flow Rates Using Calculated Values Using this method, flows were projected by dividing actual 1990 plant flow rates by the actual 1990 census populations of customer cities. This gpcd value was then applied to growth projections from 1990 - 2010, and then 2010 - 2020. This method was used by the Houston - Galveston Area Council in their wastewater planning documents and accepted by the TNRCC. Assumptions Both methodologies are based on certain assumptions about wastewater service arrangements, flow rates, and population projections. The assumptions made in these methods of projecting flow are: • All residents of cities with wastewater service receive wastewater service. • Unincorporated areas bordering current cities and with densities of greater than or equal to 1 person per acre in 2010 and 2020 will receive wastewater service. • Residential flow values of 80 gpcd (as reported in the EPA handbook: Sewer System Infrastructure Analysis and Rehabilitation 1991). A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-17 REVIEW DRAFT Lie • I/I flow values of 30 gped (average of employment gped values reported by Dallas and Fort Worth). • Direct correlation between the number of employees and the amount of flow generated by industries within a given city. • Future flow rates are equal to those obtained by dividing 1990 actual flow by 1990 census population for the service area. • Flow rates remain constant over time. • NCTCOG 1990 city boundaries do not change. • NCTCOG population projections. • Even distribution of population within TSZs. • wastewater service provider arrangements do not change. Margins of Error For every assumption made above, there are exceptions. For this reason, inexactitude is inherent in the planning process. Reasons that these projection of future wastewater flow rates may be inexact include: • Not all city residents receive wastewater service. • Future incorporations are uncertain. LP' • Flow generated by different types of employment are not equal. • Flow rates may not remain constant over time. ' • Population within TSZs is not evenly distributed. • Wastewater service provider arrangements may change over time. In addition to the error that may be incurred in both methods for projecting future wastewater flows, each method has its own strengths and weaknesses. Evaluation of Projecting Flow Based on 1990 gpcd Flow Rates In urban areas, the gpcd value used in this method may be high because the total flow is divided by the residential population and major industrial users are not factored out. Industrial users generally have higher discharge rates than residents. In rural areas, the gpcd value used in this method may be low, because significant portions of the population may be on septic systems. Please note that whenever possible, this method has been used to project the wastewater flows for community treatment works. This method has proven significantly more accurate in predicting flow rates in smaller communities. Evaluation of Projecting Flow Using Default Values for Population, Employment and I/1 In this methodology, the gped for workers in urban areas may be low because a standard value is applied for all employees. Major industrial users, like car manufacturers, are assigned the same discharge rate as minor users, like office buildings. Additionally, in rural areas there may Cie be few if any major industrial users, yet employees are still assigned this average employee wastewater generation rate. As is the above methodology, In rural areas, the gpcd value used Page 1-18 A Pad of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT r � environmental strategies in this method may be low, because significant portions of the population may be on septic systems. Determining Planning Status Based on Projected Flows Using the above methodologies for projecting flow rates, the future projected capacity need was determined for each of the joint system, and community treatment facilities for the years 2010 and 2020. Each of the joint system operators was asked to determine which methodology for projecting flow they would like to applied for their system. When possible, the joint system operators provided actual 1990 gpcd and/or gped values which were then applied to population forecasts to provide the most accurate flow projections possible. These values were used to estimate the average annual flow capacities required of the watersheds' wastewater service providers to treat the anticipated average annual flows. The planning status for each joint system and community treatment facility was projected for the year 2010. Each facility falls into one of three planning status categories. Those categories are: Capacity is sufficient to treat projected flows This planning status applies to those wastewater treatment facilities which had a 1990 permitted flow capacity that is higher than their projected 2010 annual average flow. Some facilities have upgraded their permitted capacity since 1990. Where documentation was (re available on facility upgrades which would provide sufficient capacity to treat projected flows, those facilities also were placed into this planning status category. System plan has been developed to accommodate projected flows This category applies to those wastewater treatment facilities which did not have a 1990 permitted capacity sufficient to treat the flows projected for 2010, but did have scheduled enlargements in a system plan to provide adequate flow capacity to meet projected 2010 flow rates. Planning will be needed to accommodate projected flows Those facilities which did not have 1990 permitted capacity sufficient to treat flows projected for 2010, and for which there was no available system plan to meet projected flows, were assigned this planning status. L A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-19 REVIEW DRAFT Le_ 101,, .. 1 '4*-''' ifi . ' t ) \ . ..-- lit:okliy-A-::.71041,,,.1 ,.. 1h. '- . ...;:+.__ ,, ...).... i., .,*71,:if,;:.„_.0;a41!.."-- .77-„,,.,Ps. • - 'T 4 _I, ,t.-.,- ,,:iiii.**, lq.1*W-t, ..• tW . • 41 ,.�'`■IR, '�' .u■L=� 'icy 41r , a L o m-7il:4..7744A,4.- i, 1si,........\ 'MOW :i■rlrM_5 .,IygiJ .r17iima■■l1■■■<fE,: `lvf• .11141.411 RIMBNIF/61.010111.140441e.":7 4 orfh 9■■■■■■■■■■L.:dIr L .■o■■■■■■■■■■■_m:r !■■■■■■■■■■■■rdsoy s `� M■u■■■■■".■■... untoplu-A,rir .,.-64.,, 40. �i�rTll1 ■►'. 1 Mir fr A.4. ''''-Z:_, N ,1.,‘ ‘7 +11 • REGIONAL PLANNING m sufficient I ,s „.,_ �"_ WATERSHEDS L t!•_ PLANNING STATUS OF Juan ro plan has beArea developed wv - accoaunodm projared sows WASTEWATER SYS 1 hMS ,/� needed to bemoan FOR THE YEAR 2010 projeece flows Page 1-20 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies E. Methodologies for Determining Nonpoint Source Loadings Historical nationwide water quality summaries have long suggested that many waters are being impaired by nonpoint source pollution, particularly during storm events. A regulatory focus on this water quality impact began with the Water Quality Act of 1987 and continued with USEPA issuance of urban storm water regulations in 1990 under the NPDES (Nationwide Pollution Discharge Elimination System) program. Large municipalities and certain urban areas, plus eleven categories of industry, were targeted in the initial phase and were required to prepare applications and to ultimately commit to implement management controls to reduce the impact of storm water. Urban impacts do not portray the complete picture of nonpoint source loading to a watershed; however, rural impacts have not yet been adequately assessed. The rural contribution is the focus of this 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan update. In 1989, the North Central Texas Council of Governments prepared and adopted a Regional Strategy for Managing Urban Storm Water Quality and entered into local agreements with the region's seven largest cities (Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington, Irving, Garland, Plano, and Mesquite) to provide assistance in a coordinated effort to address the NPDES requirements. The services of a regional consultant were used to address a variety of program requirements including public education, construction related runoff control, and site development and planning. In addition, the U.S. Geological Survey was engaged to monitor wet-weather storm water discharges from 30 regional monitoring sites. The goal of the wet-weather monitoring program was to provide data on storm water quality to characterize typical runoff quality from (kore residential, commercial and industrial land use cover. The final set of monitoring sites included 11 residential, 6 commercial, and 9 industrial basins plus 4 highway sites. Analysis of the 186 sampled parameters revealed that almost half (46%) were never detected in the storm water samples and only 1/4 were present in at least 10% of the samples. Based on frequency of detection, past history as a water quality problem, and comparison to Texas Surface Water Quality Standards, constituents were categorized as being of high, medium or low priority concern for the region. The high priority constituents of local concern in the Dallas-Fort Worth region are: STORM WATER CONSTITUENTS OF LOCAL CONCERN HIGH Priority Metals Others Cadmium(R) Chlordane Chromium Diazinon Copper(R) Fecal coliforms ". Lead(R) -Fecal streptococcus Zinc(R) Total-Suspended Solids TSS(R) • (R)=Annual Loading estimates required by EPA under NPDES MS4 permits L A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-21 REVIEW DRAFT L A computer watershed model was used to compute estimates of the pollutant loads for each regional watershed. Computer modeling provides a means to predict impacts from storm water pollution. Models can also facilitate evaluation of alternative management strategies. To support this effort regional consultant Camp Dresser & McKee developed a user-friendly spreadsheet- based model to simulate the generation and fate of surface pollutant loads resulting from urban storm water runoff. The model, called the Watershed Management Model (WMM), uses 12 land use categories with associated Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs) for each of 12 pollutant types, and average annual precipitation to simulate annual or seasonal pollutant loads carried in storm water runoff. EMC constants were derived from the regional storm water sampling and were used in the spreadsheet model. An average rainfall for this area of 32.0 inches per year was calculated using USGS Historical Records of Rainfall coupled with RAINEV and SYNOP software. The WMM is a planning level model that provides a basis for evaluation of the long term nonpoint pollution loads and the relative costs of nonpoint pollution management strategies. Regional storm water monitoring activities will continue during the initial five-year permit term. Following an assessment of the regional monitoring network by the USGS, redundant sites were removed and new categories of sites were targeted. These include mixed land use and instream sites, which are expected to better characterize storm water quality. An undeveloped site is also being installed to provide baseline data for future comparisons. The final permit term network will include 21 sites, with monitoring starting in 1997. Texas Clean Rivers Program Has Similar Constituents of Concern Le In North Central Texas, an assessment of the Trinity River Basin is being conducted by the Trinity River Authority (TRA) and its consultants. The second regional assessment report has been submitted to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. A primary component of this report was an analysis of eleven years (1982-92) of routine water quality monitoring data collected by the TNRCC and the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The data were compared to criteria developed for each parameter based upon the most stringent Texas Surface Water Quality Standards published for each stream segment or some other appropriate reference. From this comparison, parameters of "Concern", "Possible Concern", and "No Detectable Concern" were identified for each segment unless "Insufficient Data" existed for analysis. In spite of differences in methods of collection and data characteristics between storm water and instream sampling, the list of constituents of concern generated by the Clean Rivers Program matched closely with the storm water constituents of local concern. Both lists identify trace metals as being potential problems. Of the 5 storm water priority metals, only chromium was excluded from the river basin list. Fecal coliform bacteria was identified as a common problem. The array of nutrient parameters, which includes all forms of nitrogen and phosphorus, was also highlighted as a concern. The last common category included indicators of low dissolved oxygen levels, such as BOD. Pesticides were not included in the river basin study. However, studies have shown that diazinon, a commonly used lawn and garden pesticide, is prevalent in Texas waterways. Urban and Rural Nonpoint Sources The following discussion describes methodologies for the nonpoint source loading information Lprovided in the latter part of each watershed assessment chapter. Each watershed chapter begins with a general discussion of the watershed's land use composition, impervious cover and population growth. The land use is described in terms of 3 major categories, urban, Page 1-22 A Parr of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies L cropland and pasture land. The rural land use information was obtained from the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission and represents the best available information. Their land use data was derived at the county NRCS field office level by placing a grid (250m x 250m) over aerial photography and setting the cell land use to that existing at the center of each cell. Using GIS, detailed rural information was combined with 1995 NCTCOG urban land use. In areas where the two coverages overlapped, it was assumed that urban growth had occurred and the NCTCOG land use characterizations took precedence. The 1995 land use was created by NCTCOG's Department of Research and Information Services, in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation, from the digitization of aerial photography, rectified to the regional base map. Their land use classification scheme is based on the USGS Level I and II hierarchical classification system, with additional detail added for urbanized land uses. This classification scheme uses 20 land use categories which were combined to produce the 12 categories required for the WMM. The impervious cover characterizations were derived from standard assumptions of typical imperviousness of general land uses. These assumptions of imperviousness were provided by a professional consultant to the Regional Urban Storm Water Management Task Force after his review of pertinent literature. The Task Force approved their use in regional urban storm water modeling efforts. The values are as shown in the following table. _ _ _ Land Use j % Impervious Forest/open space 10 Agricultural/Pasture 10 Under Construction 45 Single Family Residential 50 Multifamily Residential 75 Commercial/Institutional 90 Office/Utilities 70 Industrial 80 Roads 90 Water 100 Land use characteristics and estimated percent impervious cover is described for the entire watershed and for the portion of each city occurring in the watershed. Urban Loadings The WMM was used to estimate annual nonpoint source loadings from urban land use areas in each of 97 subwatersheds in the north central Texas region. Loadings were grouped by 12 major watersheds used for wastewater planning. In each watershed assessment chapter, comparisons are made of the estimated loadings between the subwatersheds and in general terms, between the 12 major watersheds. Maps are provided which depict the quartile ranking of the loadings of key pollutants among the subwatersheds. Quartile ranking is simply a division of the range of L data into 4 equal parts such that the top rank (1) represents any value greater than 75% of the range. This gives a visual representation of where potential water quality problems could occur. A table of estimated pollutant loadings for all 11 of the calculated parameters for each A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-23 REVIEW DRAFT subwatershed is also provided. This section concludes with a listing of storm water Phase I cities • in the watershed since they will be required in their permits to address storm water impacts using management programs. Acknowledgment is given to these and other cities which may already have management programs in place. Rural Cropland Loadings Due to a lack of watershed-specific data, national data from a variety of sources was used to compile rural cropland loadings for the watersheds in the north central Texas region. At the time of publication, this national data was the best available; however, more target-specific data will be available by mid-1998. Data from HUMUS was used to estimate annual nonpoint source loadings from rural land use areas in each of the 97 subwatersheds in the north central Texas region. Loadings were also grouped by the 12 major watersheds used for wastewater planning. The primary modeling unit for the HUMUS model is the USGS 8-digit cataloging unit (by watershed). Gross erosion rates and detached nutrients are determined within each 8-digit unit and the amount reaching major water bodies is estimated using a delivery ratio (DR) and an enrichment ratio (ER) method for nutrients. The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is used to estimate the amount of gross erosion from each soil/land use unit. The STATSGO soils database was used for soils information (Lytle, 1992). The amount of organic N and P transported with the gross erosion is calculated by multiplying the gross erosion by the fraction of organic N and P in the soil. Since the STATSGO soils database (: contains the fraction of organic carbon for each layer of every soil, the fraction of organic N and P are estimated using a C:N ratio of 10 and a C:P ratio of 50 (Brady, 1974). To estimate the amount of sediment reaching the major water bodies in each 8-digit basin, the gross erosion calculated with the USLE is multiplied by a sediment delivery ratio (DR). A newly compiled soils database called STATSGO1 complements the estimated yields in the STATSGO database by providing the probable land use in each soil sequence. The percentages were assigned based on the NRCS-National Resources Inventory (NRI) data, and by expertise provided by local NRCS soil surveyors (Brown, 1994). Land Use Land Cover (LULC) data was compiled by the USGS from the middle 1970s to the early 1980s using aerial photography and Landsat images (US Geodata, 1986). The data were classified using the Anderson nomenclature at levels I and II. In STATSGO1, grasslands include pasture and rangeland whereas LULC has agricultural and pasture land as one category. The selection of soils and land uses within an 8-digit watershed was based on requirements of the national HUMUS study. The percent of the soil sequence occupied by crops was obtained by multiplying the percent cover of a soil sequence in a polygon with the likelihood of that sequence to have crops. The percentages from the selected soil sequences with land cover types were multiplied by the percent cover occupied by the soil polygon in the watershed. Each of the land cover percentages found from the soil polygons were multiplied by the amount of land use coverage determined from the LULC map. The individual crop cover, determined from (60,, the Agcensus, were based on multiplication of crop cover percentages by the percent cover occupied by the county within the 8-digit watershed. The Agland category was assigned as land cover to those soil sequences to which specific crops could not be assigned from the Page 1-24 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT enviro1:..Th nmental strategies (kir Agcensus database. The USLE is applied.to each unit and the appropriate enrichment ratio and delivery ratio are applied to estimate delvered sediment and nutrients. Loading rates (Ibs/acre) of N, P and sediment were obtained from the NRCS for each of the six 8-digit HUC watersheds that cover the north central Texas region: These loading rates were applied to the acres of cropland in eau".of the 12 major watersheds on a subwatershed level, where possible. Rural land use informaton was obtained from the NRCS as detailed earlier on page 1-24. 11130201 v vVv 11130210 11140101 12030103 301 � E � il t. P "^r" -- sus 101 f t L'x"£ h. E R :;,,, ...,-.3„,. 'T-'441:7;i4a*;;; ;T:74.31;Mig:i:ED ..4-:',t•Iiik:i4 -74i4.,.,.,T.144114,411, 12fl3}iEl(iiime 12060201 f 1 30105 12030109 12060202 U.S.G.S.8-digit Hydrologic _ M,..,,,,..,,� Watershed Boundaries and `� Regional Planning Watersheds — •. H,6d.pc wsm6.d ➢oudaMs aL1'A(i L A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-25 • REVIEW DRAFT L Overall Water Quality Assessment In this last section of the watershed assessment chapters, the Constituents of Concern identified by the Clean Rivers Program are listed for each State Stream Segment found in each watershed. This section will also include impacted stream segments from the State's adopted 1996 303(d) List. F. Nonpoint Source Loadings - Summary Urban and Rural Nonpoint Sources The 12 watersheds of the Upper Trinity River Basin support a diversity of land uses. Approximately 56% of the Basin is used for rural purposes: 18% for cropland and 38% for pasture. Most of this rural land is found on the edges of the Basin's boundaries, around the urban core of the metroplex. The watersheds with the greatest percentages of rural lands are the Grapevine Reservoir, Eagle Mountain and Lake Worth Reservoir, and Arlington and Benbrook Reservoir Watersheds. The White Rock Lake Watershed has the least. Twenty-eight percent of the Basin is estimated to be impervious cover. Most of this area is found in the center of the Basin in Fort Worth, Dallas, and the Mid-Cities. The watersheds with the highest percentages of impervious cover are the White Rock Lake, Mid-Cities, and Lower Elm Fork Watersheds. The Grapevine Reservoir Watershed has the lowest percentage impervious cover. ( The population centers of the Upper Trinity River Basin are expanding rapidly. Population densities are increasing in the urban centers, and land that was once rural is being transformed by development. Between 1990 and 2020 the population of the Upper Trinity River Basin is expected to grow from 3,649,395 to 5,439,084. The watersheds growing most rapidly are the Grapevine Reservoir and Joe Pool Reservoir Watersheds. Rapid growth in the metroplex will have dramatic impacts on nonpoint sources of pollution. High impervious cover, high population density, high traffic levels, and shrinking percentage of open or rural land put these watersheds in danger of negatively impacting the water bodies to which they drain. Surface water volumes and velocities will increase, as will erosion, sedimentation, floatables and other nonpoint source problems. Preventing water quality degradation will require careful management and implementation of both urban and rural best management practices for nonpoint source controls. Area in % % % Total Watershed Impervious Cropland Pastureland % (acres) cover Rural Upper Trinity River 2,599,829 28 18 38 56 Basin Lori Page 1-26 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies 1:2L L MP' Land Use Information for the 12 Regional Watersheds Area in % % % Total Watershed Watershed Impervious Cropland Pastureland % (acres) cover Rural •rlington and 205, 169 22 10 59 69 1Benbrook Reservoir Eagle Mountain and 188,164 24 7 62 69 Lake Worth Reservoir rapevine Reservoir 220,850 18 23 60 83 oe Pool Reservoir 143,198 21 31 37 68 Lewisville Reservoir 275,188 24 20 48 68 Lower East Fork 149,867 25 23 41 64 Reservoir Lower Elm Fork 142,768 41 4 23 27 Reservoir Mid-Cities 212,759 42 5 15 20 rinity Mainstem 397,660 28 25 30 55 Upper East Fork 411,891 29 28 32 60 L Reservoirs est Trinity Forks 188,666 35 11 23 34 hite Rock Lake 63,649 47 12 5 17 Percent Land Use by Category for the Upper Trinity River Basin Utenkm Cther Pres 31% 7% 41111 •8% 1v/o C A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-27 REVIEW DRAFT Urban Loadings Urban loadings of 11 parameters were estimated for the 12 watersheds of the Upper Trinity River Basin using WMM. This model used 1995 land use to estimate loadings of BOD, COD, TSS, TDS, TP, DP, TKN, nitrites and nitrates, lead, copper and zinc. Of the 12 watersheds, the 2 with the highest estimated loadings are the Upper East Fork Reservoirs and Trinity Mainstem Watersheds for all parameters except BOD, lead, copper and zinc. The highest loadings of BOD lead, copper and zinc are found in the Mid-Cities and Trinity Mainstem Watersheds. Of the 12 watersheds, the White Rock Lake Watershed has the lowest estimated loadings for all parameters except BOD, DP, Lead, Copper and Zinc. The lowest BOD, TP, lead and zinc loadings are found in the Joe Pool Reservoir Watershed. The lowest loadings of copper are found in the Grapevine Lake Watershed. Seven cities in the Upper Trinity River Basin are participating in EPA's Phase I NPDES Stormwater Permit Program. These cities are Fort Worth, Dallas, Arlington, Irving, Garland, Plano, and Mesquite. Permits have been issued for 3 cities, and the remaining should be issued by the end of 1998. The permits, once issued, will require the implementation of best management practices to address storm water quality. All of these cities have management programs already in place, as do many of the smaller cities. These efforts have undoubtedly reduced nonpoint source impacts already, and will continue to do so. Urban Loadings for the 12 Regional Watersheds Watershed USGS BOD COD TSS TDS Code (bs/yr) (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) Arlington and 12030102 1,833,107 33,713,987 45,629,742 111,420,059 Benbrook Reservoir Eagle Mountain and 12030101 1,332,010 26,777,855 36,164,141 101,633,851 Lake Worth Reservoir and 12030102 Grapevine Reservoir 12030104 1,357,373 29,009,098 38,882,034 120,183,944 Joe Pool Reservoir 12030102 1,184,613 23,409,640 32,771,423 87,639,781 Lewisville Reservoir 12030103 2,187,970 46,011,249 61,479,629 185,159,046 Lower East Fork 12030106 1,870,739 30,146,865 40,886,985 80,660,508 Reservoir Lower Elm Fork 12030103 3,108,478 42,196,966 57,323,166 77,246,613 Reservoir and 12030104 Mid-Cities 12030102 4,640,033 63,400,327 81,827,020 105,864,422 Trinity Mainstem 12030105 5,664,910 87,079,666 119,193,241 205,053,415 Upper East Fork 12030106 4,045,640 79,788,834 105,994,652 287,716,730 Reservoirs West Trinity Forks 12030102 3,519,404 49,881,241 67,191,879 93,765,959 White Rock Lake 12030105 1,622,989 22,214,937 28,423,383 30,289,351 Le' Page 1-28 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT -� environmental strategies Watershed TP DP TKN NO2+NO3 Lead Copper Zinc (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) _ (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) lbs/ r) Arlington and 116,150 66,673 610,622 340,040 6,539 4,769 21,241 Benbrook Reservoir Eagle Mountain 91,508 51,593 506,134 286,409 4,633 3,386 14,523 and Lake Worth Reservoir Grapevine 98,196 54,439 565,546 324,190 4,670 3,325 14,105 Reservoir Joe Pool 80,436 45,271 438,771 249,724 4,316 3,668 13,848 Reservoir Lewisville 156,275 87,289 888,425 506,034 7,454 5,193 22,727 Reservoir Lower East Fork 103,526 60,000 512,532 282,977 7,202 5,349 24,102 Reservoir Lower Elm Fork 142,759 82,996 651,551 359,219 13,199 10,039 45,118 Reservoir Mid-Cities 216,189 128,475 974,014 518,896 18,469 11,922 62,960 Trinity Mainstem 300,942 176,305 1,434,184 783,154 22,105 16,808 75,158 Upper East Fork 274,472 157,123 1,486,782 828,074 13,517 8,933 42,684 Reservoirs i West Trinity 171,734 101,597 781,751 421,050 14,073 10,233 48,275 Forks White Rock 77,845 47,830 332,905 168,586 6,008 3,567 20,870 Lake Rural Cropland Loadings For the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan, a strategy was outlined for developing loadings from rural watershed areas to complement the urban load data first presented in the 1997 Annual Plan and complete the information on overall pollutant loads to each watershed. As outlined in the Regional Overview and Methodology section, data were initially obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) in Temple, Texas. NRCS used the HUMUS model to generate estimates of loading rates for watersheds at the 8-digit cataloging unit level. After adapting the data to match the twelve watersheds used in NCTCOG's Annual Plan, it was apparent that there were some inconsistencies in the resulting pollutant loads. After discussions with the NRCS staff, they requested additional time to review their data and do additional model runs with the HUMUS model to ensure that the unit loading rates and resulting pollutant loads for watersheds were appropriate. The NRCS is now in the process of evaluating and confirming this information, and therefore rural loading information will not be available to incorporate into the 1998 Annual Plan. NCTCOG is continuing to work with the NRCS, the Texas Soil and Water Conservation Board, and others to identify loading information for non-urban areas. The information about rural contributions or impacts to water quality will be compiled, refined, and incorporated into the 1999 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas. The 1998 Annual Plan continues to reflect information about contributions from urban areas and selected details about state assessments that identify water quality concerns linked to rural or agricultural activities. A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-29 REVIEW DRAFT Overall Water Quality Assessment Seven upper Trinity River segments are included on the State's adopted 1996 303(d) list primarily due to bacteria and/or pesticide/herbicide exceedances (see table below). In all segments named on this list, the aquatic life use is not supported either partially or completely throughout the segment. The Upper Trinity River, West Fork Trinity River below Lake Worth, Clear Fork Trinity River below Benbrook Lake, and Lower West Fork Trinity River segments do not support fish consumption due to elevated levels of chlordane in fish tissue. Elevated dissolved zinc concentrations are cited as the reason for impairment in the Upper Trinity River and Elm Fork Trinity River below Lewisville Lake segments. Fosdic Lake and Lake Como are listed due to elevated levels of chlordane, PCBs, dieldrin, and DDE in fish tissue. Elevated levels of PCBs are cited as cause of impairment for Echo Lake, while Mountain Creek Lake is listed due to elevated levels of selenium and PCBs. The East Fork Trinity River and Elm Fork Trinity River below Lewisville Lake segments are listed for elevated dissolved cadmium concentrations and elevated dissolved lead concentrations, respectively. Low dissolved oxygen levels were cited as cause for impairment in the East Fork Trinity River, Elm Fork Trinity River below Lewisville Lake, and Clear Fork Trinity River below Lake Weatherford segments. The contact recreation use is not supported in all segments, either partially or completely, due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. 1996 State 303(d) List Segment Segment Reason for Impairment Number Name 0805 Upper Trinity The Texas Department of Health issued an aquatic life closure in River January 1990, due to elevated levels of chlordane in fish tissue. The affected reach extends 19 miles from the upper limit of the segment to IH 20 downstream from Dallas. The aquatic life use is not supported from FM 85 to a point 25 miles downstream, because the mean dissolved zinc concentration exceeds the chronic aquatic life criterion. The contact recreation use is not supported through the entire segment, due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. Page 1-30 A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas REVIEW DRAFT environmental strategies 0806 West Fork The Texas Department of Health has issued aquatic life closures • Trinity River for three areas in the watershed: (1) a 23-mile reach of the West below Lake Fork Trinity River from the Clear Fork Trinity River confluence to Worth the lower limit of the segment, in January 1990, due to elevated levels of chlordane in fish tissue; (2) Fosdic Lake, an unclassified 6-acre reservoir in Fort Worth, in April 1995, due to elevated levels of chlordane, PCBs, dieldrin, and DDE in fish tissue; and (3) Echo Lake, an unclassified 17-acre impoundment in Fort Worth, in December 1995, due to elevated levels of PCBs in fish tissue. The contact recreation use is not supported in the upper 17 miles, and not supported in the lower 16 miles, due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. 0819 East Fork The aquatic life use is not supported due to elevated dissolved Trinity River cadmium concentrations. It is only partially supported based on depressed dissolved oxygen concentrations in a 6-mile reach from 2 miles upstream of Malloy Bridge Rd. to US 175. The contact recreation use is not supported due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. 0822 Elm Fork The aquatic life use is not supported from SH 121 to 3 miles Trinity River upstream of the mouth due to elevated concentrations of dissolved below lead. The aquatic life use is only partially supported based on two Lewisville other factors: depressed dissolved oxygen concentrations in the Lake upper 9-mile reach, and elevated dissolved zinc concentrations from SH 121 to 3 miles upstream of the mouth. The contact recreation use is only partially supported in the extreme lower end due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. 0829 Clear Fork The Texas Department of Health has issued aquatic life closures Trinity River for two areas in the watershed: (1) a 1-mile reach of the Clear below Fork Trinity River from 7th Street in Fort Worth to the West Fork Benbrook Trinity River confluence, in January 1990, due to elevated levels of Lake chlordane in fish tissue; and (2) Lake Como, an unclassified 15- acre reservoir in Fort Worth, in April 1995, due to elevated levels of chlordane, PCBs, dieldrin, and DDE in fish tissue. The contact recreation use is only partially supported in the downstream half due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. 0831 Clear Fork The aquatic life use is not supported in the upper 8 miles because Trinity River of depressed dissolved oxygen levels. The contact recreation use below Lake is not supported in the upper 8 miles, and only partially supported Weatherford in the lower 11 miles, due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. 0841 Lower West The Texas Department of Health has issued an aquatic life closure Fork Trinity in January 1990, due to elevated levels of chlordane in fish tissue. River The entire segment is affected by this closure. An aquatic life closure was issued in April 1996 for Mountain Creek Lake, a small urban reservoir located in Grand Prairie, due to elevated levels of selenium and PCBs in fish tissue. The contact recreation use is not supported due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. • A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quality Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-31 taiir...%, n z EJ: 4 I 1 ill .4, „, , ,,j P.c7i 19 II ! Cd m g E 6 j 1 c' 1 I I _� ' �� i=1 1, i -firs Tr = 4 . — •_r l' ` � I L `- t sk . i ,•t-� c. r %,v,r' �►`. .. h.J ry: , 'i;.i' f /S ,e • / -/• -r %1 hIlr-/- w-�.`'� 72,4_, ... a �3N' /i. r `1 ' 1: s'" , 1" a !•1 4 A1a - - -r`•-T 4 -,;-,' y •��F�` / Iii• : �j 4J12 '-7-;x*Aftly, - , y --%r ybx ■ta S.4 'x _ G 1, ;<^ , ) ��I.. y i� i ,ii �'} r" 1. _ � � : � t o 4- nab 91a ; _, /, `�_,--, ,,1( 'Flr �` � ��)(lft 1 i Y j 44 __, x / ', J 1 r j. y / l �� ` 11..J�y' .ice „�:' )t4 d.J .01. 4 I .^ ` ` _-...7:,,, ''''',4'''' '/j„....,\2.1:-..:,:,',_ - ..*.':"....:1-1 Klik. -[.....--.7., 7.7,1 r '..,\ --------_ T.T.. 44 i � A� vim: —� s �,1 i' ^�C ,J1 1 �r ?, , ,—'- tom L =1 f� rr — �` A Part of the 1998 Annual Water Quaity Management Plan for North Central Texas Page 1-33 City of Southlake,Texas Recent submittals for your information. CASE DESCRIPTION 98-081 SITE PLAN Lot 3-R-1, Block 1, Georgetown Park Location: On the south side of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) approximately 800' east of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and South Kimball Avenue Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District Applicant: Pieter Andreis Jewelry Owner: Georgetown Monticello Partners 98-082 SPECIFIC USE PERMIT Southlake Town Crossing Location: On the northeast corner of the intersection of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) and Kimball Avenue, south of State Highway 114 Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District Applicant: Lowes Companies, Inc. Owner: Hanover Properties 98-083 PLAT SHOWING Lots 12, 13 & 14, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition, French Square Office Complex Location: On the south side of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 1,150' east of the intersection of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) and White Chapel Boulevard Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" uses Owner and Applicant: David Ford 98-084 REZONING Lots 13 & 14, T.M. Hood No. 706 Addition Location: 1310 Shady Oaks Drive Requested Zoning: "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District Applicant: Lyle Shuping Owner: Mary Estelle Shuping 98-085 PLAT SHOWING Lots 13 & 14, T.M. Hood No. 706 Addition Location: 1310 Shady Oaks Drive Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District Applicant: Lyle Shuping Owner: Mary Estelle Shuping City of Southlake,Texas 98-086 PLAT REVISION Lots 17R-27R, Block 42 and Common Green#45,Timarron Addition-Crescent Royale Location: On the south side of Queensbury Turn at the intersection of Queensbury Turn and Regency Crossing, adjacent to Timarron Golf Course Current Zoning: "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District Applicant: Westerra Timarron, L.P. Owner: Westerra Timarron, L.P., Ritz Properties, Inc., and Bryan and Enice Burke L L t 3� a� i� al ANGCYI L. JAFTS .R ± ! AND MV L,IOA JAl'PS ITAOM ONG! SLECMS/IX VCL 3M•25 PACE J9 Za® S'/A 1 LAID uSE 0.,K.vA7at LaY GExS/Tr fLzS.LBv.^dL- J I I I - ACtSE.Q rLEW 4L-'ArS `.EACaU OAKS -'%-.'bi2 P.tE sa, 1 DR rGT. ZP•EC 3 1 LAND LSE CESKS'-_z,,d ccw orrslr* REs.aErr:AL r I I �I — f" .rcc rac ,YtOM str f•OC M 93' s .Vela aria • L �• NnG �a ; "wc n• Ln.cr r• . JiPaP r.�f •' " Er1Lr S+AAfQ.K va-a &. PAGE'S. JRr.C:. iSITE DATA ZoNm AG LAND ISE DESAr A"'ICN M�'D LA,OSCAPE M•F.AS i LOT 3-R-L BLOCK I a ••Jt TER rARCs I ! GEOFZE TOWN PARK ;i ,tr EnrJa+nree . arlrs i 90L'TMA)M TARRAYT CO. TEXAS roWLcmre EXSTM ZONED C-2 PROP. ZONING C-2 "'ICAO-P D j LAND USE DEMONATM MDMDASS _ Z •.••t^irG4T® .I 6. nW MA:d! lsb.c fcc.r':.1rt 0..90 A_+ES all L_R3 3-3 ACRES _<v: La}: I �snrf r0 a r. b.r t! MU6 SI' J6aji! Y J996Ti SF , { PdOc.Y.a .ROD• ! R'•W 3. wa ' 3.9, - e -=.wort i rlreCICAP. PBCi .PQC/J: '. I :3 lIv TO'AL SPACES "YC. .J Jit .03 'Fffy'/REo LCACfp SPACES I 0 PQovvEC LOACt✓ _PAC`s o j . . 0 L tte- Sl = =OVERAGE AREA- 6.930 5. 13,es. 30t ie eiz 3F 9r<C01ERAC.E s-. nf.) 1.V3t 10Df . PAYII AIMF L 'Use Y .V.3F '65..03P I Psv+ct .°FRG�.Irdr.�: •9oa .o„ .r•J AREA CPC. _ SPACE :Sib 3F ! 7 3F S.1•a 3F .Pew^-,T,"E C1PEN .SPACE 33.4. 32J s See s i ARA GP dRs2E l:OQAC•E 0 Sa 0 SO. T a Sa :m CF Curs/CE Sri t 0 Sa A a Sa o sa Fr P_CCR AREA { *.'So SF i :JSA72 SF 2*.3 4 SF .-4. we! rx STOR/ES I 111 1 t 2 :urns GCA. rrE.Cr+r 12-3 -s` 4NfIC:TA EC CacSr sOEDULE:I FALL . 98 DRAWING FILE: I:\nYE\SiteclN E2ITCR: .(.N. 13:C9 A.V. C6/18/98 =RE'::C..S `-CITCR: <..N. 9-_'3 a. •J. ^5%23: 95 INTERIOR LA.`1D6CAM S MAAKY CHART �rcfL+/C .uc.+ • .> .flA N �NO�' I[�vr! !Md 16R1M C�O.I a..f / may) • � I � I >•' •\TrtO A••f � � I Yf vC'E. °'V"R 31T "9-E.(NLr lam. ire s �'o�. t'w rn+•Pc'� 9 2 lE JJi3S' ! L0! Ol3e' J YCY. e1i. PAGE ' ,' :.tI.O :J%CES✓J•Idr.a+: aErd.L/=.'X'1"EK:� -V 1WFII ,mv.Qn IMMARY 6iART Lir ACM I IPOM ��tr/ � '�!) I '�N A j �••d, I Kam/ ��� i Ir,Jry � ��awo I �r y• a s .cw� I J ,�o.cm r r- 0 j t • Y Na/ I i.•Jr ,wa11� ,i I' - A I t • Nsor I, .....� N,• .• .. I t Nae { I fCyv I ltir.® /R' I f' • I f N hO•! ---•-.I P- I ,.. A I—V......,w ....d.. µ ....ry ._.s ....,.....Q.L,� .w..w., . mew erg. r wP. rl..f /,•ir y.w� Fr+r .....P .r+.y r .ry nrI �.P.� �....�..�.. t- �...�... r,�i,r��wl�•+..rs srr..r�r .a •s•w w.•w•..ar } BrAd� r'ywy a,• rwn •E/Wr/..LLEY ACCIr.— ar, xax .nrwvLro •.+.c ��trt tr.oe m'vr / :oeo v :A'O J!E �E6CMA.-'7. CT•./�" � AGLLY r� -- ---- ---- ---- -�,-- --------J 3 !/!////!///// ////�/// ' ! //// /// �• / / CA✓ALLINO PRgPERr/ED I.M. LCL r. PAGE I/a Z_- L STATE GP �xAs / Za+© O a vvc. 7sol� P.Yf JPir Ldrm WE OESYN4r•GTk h'OCM ZAI NL1T • y� \�\v` a�r�R«o'auef �. l • as Pdnra A rf \ Y' " LIV o .1I15c nD iEslCNdrrLT4 FJ 41 i cw�rr s�K PROPOSED LOT 3-R-t BLOCK 1 GEORGETOWN PARK ' IMSrA-';TEJtAs - vaL9J3s. P.v9E OIC / OR:GT/ liiiiYp / l E . [7ur@-0riE 1 EAfIX NARLEr vfx Q2" PAGE 402 / ORrr_r. ZCNEC •d t1D�'J LAAC USE DESKJ4aT/GTk APPLICANT AWALrr CAI-rI QA-'IX I :So ,. r fiT .L to- rra sp.v.fr- r uos/ j Til. lelfl.eS-QM p„ !arl .ae•333T I STO. r-U..t $W rw fi pvPn T_. 7s031 T.L fini 450.4200 e / / CONSULTANTS. fe:.�o•eve 9.!^R IYrL•�P /// / r� .4e.•�I•r.. v .,.. r.,. .., y..:;.ee I 70., K N/�.ury 360 wlu 96o e^yo x /Ln !4 StI!(P ra l• / >tGf-uWX ( l I GrN P.s s, iX 3aSo spavMa /au. 'soy/ rur. (er/ bA0-al.Vo T.L. (alr1323-69w :9 n. JE. .. l !ari i33.33a9 : !ar 339•TiT/ / v..r-+I .,o.f.cvr aar � l I r w , VFCIPQIY MAP - 1 SITE PLANEI l i i rag sa/AiA F / TOR 3-R' BLOCK L $ GEORGE TOWN PARK L/1/ JS �' sounE AI TARRANr GO, TEXAS m 15' 50' �5• 0�. = A�o67� tcovm /(;U !.' L 131998 CrrY � Ma Ixe"a I 9!- L= DAM 6/L51% SHM WO M MM FOX LQr 7-" \DR I DWG. FILE SCALE: 1'.40' PRN: REC'V. CHKG: VG1D: North elevation (Front) mr Southelevation (Rear) 31998 DWG. FILE SCALE: PRNI! RECV. - CHKO: MSM DATE &r" SHM M'D -mum 32VATIM A-2 DRAWING FILE: 1:\HYE\Elev2 EDITOR: K.N. 10:06 A.M. C6/26/98 -REjiCUS EDITOR: CD O� CD O� O� CD CD C9 CP CD CP CD CD m CD CD CP ���cnAwN=0��0�00000 rnrr3rrQ�Q�pQQQQ2p> j33�c3D�77737DC77C7,77n7� A >D A a m A A C-10 CD CD CD CD CD CP CP CD CD m C) CP CP CD Z) Q K) �JCNJ��WNNQ� CPCPCPCP���CP-aCPp�OCP=�'�� O>>T- => r-r-r-Q(3>m>QC, rn 7C 7C 7C 3 C) 7>3 7 >77 > C > D D O 7A A C7 U3 rn r W m r m E7 a f_ E—' i - ° co m y NG)r- oomoo C)m rn c:jHU I IT MM (DiC za�< mT� �A �o oSA ' X<D>ON� A N N O N 00°00'20" E Uri � W N •N •m N 'l IN m •� Q � • 5 000011351, 24a.as' � � ./ 1 /-97 17 a i I ' ' i I 1079.I9 iTEVE d OWE IE :.US+E' T VOL . d7 a7 , PC . -S<c N 00.223T W v.o S. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 a. „1 1 1S1JIly �, u!rp LF., or 1 .aaM. I I rt� > Lot 2 - i Lot 1 i ; _ Lot 3 I II i' =a y -;—t S7.lA S, .dF I r I I e •\-\ •\-\ 1 Block 1 I I cgs \ 1 I — ---------- •r---------------- —........... _ c i F s' ---:.— R ._.. __.. �� '— - - }7•i I i 2r ni 'I n N • _ I i �E�aements.4�_ ___—____________________________ I --- 1 ---------------- -�J-------------- -j I. , ado l7 tS'.dRy Eaaemed try Vltb _a.e J. 26S.S2 10lletilT-eaaeman l_ -------------- j 23 2a _ II 1 _ l I' " --'"-------- 5•u.E' ------- vim-. U.E. ` J BLOCK 31E J.F. RICIrRCS ' i I r; TY OF90LTH.AXE 4NI(IPAL AL.:2291, P;. LK1 Da.,T.^.a..TK. ______________a_ - I' COfL_z CAB -_.RICE — K l (AP-RMM: AWL R.AT `& = __.------------------------ 111 Plat Showing &M CM--YVU-E wommon MWgwi French Square Office Complex Addition Being 6.1441 Acres out of the 0 W KNIGHT SURVEY Abstract # 899 City of Southlake Tarrant County, Texas June 19, 1995 3 lots this plat recorded in Cabinet --Slide date 2 M STATE OF TV" COUNTY OF TRA WHEREAS. 1TOt JOKr VENRRE PARTNERS 1. M Tarr d. S11a1 ara Ld dtard #Wad b M O. W. MOOT SURVEY. ABSTRACT MS. Tame C..*. T—atmNlpb tr #bad ndarded h Vallalr P.p. d M O..d Rrarda dTrrra Cam'tA Tas en0 bxap Mdaaah trddMad raawpd by PLO. 3.0 Ednrda and Jr P. Farm b Ray Baby aq.ea, Lars Saar. by Oau lord Ana 1, f9i7 r nw In Vdnr 4410. Papa SQS d dM Deed Rehab d Tanat C ft Tt aaf taut' man P•'aaAa I dry Md r 10— SEGINN04 d a Talra Oocxv" Kd Tral.PNWM Mar aaaeaeur.brM at a hMCa mrlr n fb Sarah d ShM 150 ., N. 1709 (Sadar. 8aaa.4 (of rN" 40 not.W.0 r WAaraad and 0*4 brq 90 fad Maholy d and mewl, lM c.ar arM &"W SMM 333 • 46 97, ab bap M mw..d Falrr d ha naran dreMd S 141 a rd in M amnbn M Of sob WOV bad and dad onto W a aW d'ad P pd b Sbw Gamd W4W* Obb Grnt a nddrdad n Vr 4747. Pepe 1622 d M dad Ramrdt d Tanta Caa.y, Teaa.; THENCE Sall SS dq.r 12 n..Ar 1t aamrar EaK abnq dr W Gael M d 9tre Hro'•.y 17St and n aanaaw bM.addv,d2Ag IsaobrbplfMmVoda9=cams03 tramdR* Baby a.d r Idametl h Ba'aadryltr Ag.rnra r ncadadw Va1nM 9t73, Papa b07] dM Dud R..ab dTman Cash Tma.aM Pr. bd pM mdrrt hoar dM er.b da.ae.d 1141 alas *M Saby) 0.4 dad baeq M mr#endahtnrdMG11r1 t0.a0U am r dbndrmr'aaMd bTl.rtal Lam Cbrbaabn Cb~j Bar Cnu Cpneudka:M) r n dad h Vakxne 9#23. Pape 1GM dM DOW Rrwd•dTrrr. Ca.b. T••r 'HENCESail DD d.- 22..Rr91.aaolabE.KwdaShe o:aega br d add B.aa a:ad Tb..na1 ] ft"malbeq Mice tK a dabnee of 10SM22100b an Tad Idn brats d#r MAP. mna.l m naN M dMd Pa.11'a,t.9t72.n tr.d dMd mlrl•7•d b BhaealP lair lar Vraen r r.prdM h Vdur 6/95, da 1775dMDaedRda ky Tan=Cana.Tom•.add bentad•9MWMT_a SW fW.hdaapFbr St4,.a.(.aid Saa.yt rrdrannd'n+aA Sah'radaaT lit ApMalr6.b dai'p M fadaand almar d a.idTmrron.eR THENCESoda S9 d•- AlMnlb.1Saand.West.dea d251.7/1raw.FrslbbagMe Fr b m M M band K.,n m ..sob paw. bwg Ma Awaa1P d SM Iwai da.abad S. 1441 apa I.M S.byl boa aaP brp m rud.ad caner.1.ab Game t.K THENCE N.d 00 dogma 22 ndnuae l" aemnds W.K wee M aarrnen FM dwd Bd.y rM G..* boar mad r a" I— f, . dat.nc. d 1M.a14d.V M POET OF SEG"64 and m'MUM r'9 247.639 sauce red a S. 1441 aaas of land M 0a IM NOW. THEREFORE. KNOW ALL MEN W THESE PRESENTS TRW 1TC9 Ja. Vanbr. PeMs a and #:Hugh e. day appa:rr Wad dM harry abd dr P,d de+grtp M brraebae dasuMd red pddrn r Lab 1, 2 aM O of 3 *0 1 d M FRENCH "WARE OFFCE COMR°J( ADDITION. aM da naleh dedade b M palb•. ur brah.r d aa.ab aM er.menb aneaaa n.raan rM b laelab/ bbad aa.dlaa. autcaaap., •a.9'r b war.nt alad,pet.r ddrM m aia b m .tad a healed L STATE OF TMA9 COUNTY OF -ARRANT Sep..a.. dr uMarnlprMd, a Nol.'Y Pleb a aM M cab aaxq Yrd ra1a, an dr dM PahrlMh appe.led D.M L. Fad M bh apa:ited apW M 1709 Jan VrMae PeMer and •mown b r b u M p'aa^ wart ham.a*a t d b dM bro(rroep u.tumad.M adm Vedped the Me MWM M ame for aM ahad0a and ton.Aafabn Marcia aap.uad n M -ICY Mnen ablad r yM ad /M deco d f709 Jai# VaT,V. Pella. GIVEN ur'da my haw and a.d of elk. IMa _ dry al ISM `nfaq PYIat SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION This.. b rrry Mr I, Randy 9 Ge9ay.. R.p.bnd Prokaapna LaM Suv+yor d M Sbb d Ten. :h.ve yadad Ma rove e:bdliM 4a. r ety n an Ma ground hove'/ grad tW as plot m t in9b a.ob er. pan! d Nrrra. fnN be paPeM me ed an M gda'd and that Mb old conecd/' repeunb Md au-y mda q n. a undo m'/ dretipn and wp.nl.en andl S Gragay RP_S 44921 AgJrTld ry Me C:ty d SadNNe �!a Veer Cty Sea.ury O_ 1709 Jdnl Vanua 9— D.wd L Pats P. O. G..1702 aowMae, Tear "M (317)491-=5 - 2 Randy Gregory Surveying 7700 Precinct Line Road RECD J U L 1 � 1998 Suite 200 Fort Worth, Texas 76180 (817)656-0610 (817)577-9436 FAX - a � J G• 1 I , 1 �V�pA , u ----------------------_----_-- I , ser332sE es+r ------J-- ------------j----i fad r-T----- -- I I I 1 .p qa �t�M �� I 1 >il 13 I.i� LSO.". rAw fort. Ih � IC � flrullr Y<�. I --- 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 I I IN , I 1 I 1 �•�� �--------------------------- ----------------------------°----------------i----� I TH.eru'2rW. $27W ; a� �o Ode APPROVED 9Y THE PLANNING A ZONING COMMISSION ZIM Ia f[OCIAfn APPROVED 9Y THE CITY COUNCIL fm wnr mt SCWAtn PLAT SHOWING T. M. HOOD ADDITION LOTS 13 & 14 AN ADDITION. TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS SITUATED IN THE THOMAS HOOD SURVEY A-706 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PUT RECORDED IN CABINET , SUDE , DATE Rm 7 Rw a mum w UAWN m ram.:ria ..rya : wimi.vua ci r ar-a: m• t.. r •v •r• rw I.hr� rah• . rYw OYr A Y ,rl f.�Y r ft. rn..1 wN ;r•r riY.� ��. r • 1�►r r✓ ..�I• r a rwl �Y• r w� 11 M IK %_ ilw6 ►✓• w «� •Yrr �Y rr. r.1• h )r W. M w 3k m 1.4 wl h f.Y iA» Aw m nr! ► w`i r ' INK FT ali 9 i1 6r0 r I..l TNDU rY • 1,— a W-k NW rr 1• . P •* M—. d Irrr w UI� a M.Y. M .rY �11A I. Rid rr • I W •..A ..hN rrlf h Mnr 11 .f.,r rlr .....1rrr..11..Yd 1 1r t60� r/. rh1.1 O.q. wwf- 1~i• i `IA r�r ir�I.a :r w Ai+Ir \r .r —..to. rww a . rr Yr+ r MCI[ f.r 1 a rr. Is M.Y ha r1•• h w rr a w . L mYDRa WAC16 PKW 16 IXT IM r N MW 11 BMR .1 I"I,f" �.•r,rr�� IM r r•L — . 1 1 1 •d�rM r.Ir. W1f.111 li Ilmf10—rh r7.=1= TArt,� IY, 4/.r r+.r. Y tiw rr Y ,1r h A..flrw• /w�A tY 1�0. A0011701. . wYi. r N {f11 r f.alY. r Y A.r7 1.Y+ b N /'.Y w r^'. hi�i �1 rq• rrw 1... rr Y rr7 1•.w h r.rfI.� r,w . Y /V N Y rler � N •r..YY r Mf•P .rr• y.i M r p.r EI Yrry ` � . •rIf wr b/ Mr rw1 /J rw h AM r I..,w w1 r.P ...r r . M r n ►rra 1...a f..ti r.Ia.. rA. r>,..�Y . �.•r rYr r .r w r.Ir . f1�1.• A h W .& o y . m b. , . r•r.. r r n.n•. q+1• . 4 r 9...�w .1 G�i Mr �iiili► n�.✓YI► .I�.•�* MYir rW N ...rt r• ►y\I h r � I. .,.. Thb 7rA .w.r m. I„«•r .1 tii. r e. allr r .ram r Ir.Y r Trw• *-ft T— f« •A r Wa QIO1L Ow" fuz w mu H mom w ROW e w11. •. r .Y.+qw .f.•r. • fr.I nrr r .r rr w a.11 .• frr, . fY h r.+••+r wf�ww1�.1 .erw.e�' i wit M •••�M Im 0.I .r. "..w • i wr r ,Alt er M r frr N.,►r I. frr A ice. KNCN ALL MEN 9Y THESE PR SEN'M }IIr l Ai1.1 %-*- . 1.%"-d PWw W >a++l+._ .. n..r a.r .I .•.•r1.1 . N n••1• (�• - D Q 7 V �l.Vo .R rl1.Q GR RE J U L 131998 011'a PLAT SHOWING " E.M. Shuphq „,,� TX T. M. HOOD ADDITION LOTS 13 & 14 AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS THOMAS HOOD SURVEY A-706 Ip°0aY Tow n�m 1n-Als-NM DATE: JaLY isle SrJiIE• I•:1O• REVISED* REFERENCE N0. "203 I i E } t ' ri x!\ \ I ! =or.c•Ir� I. r PROJECT ��1S LOCAT)ON M w t 1 LOCATM MAP (N.T IL too 50 O LN SCALE iN FEET t LIME TAREil NO. KARM "STAKE LIS S• a' E SOO ' 19 N4 I 544'47 1000' L21 Ii3r 13'3 41 AR' Lt2 tlDi E 14.37' E OtARVE pATA IO. D R E C16 VIfM'SS 200.00' 241.25' N7T1 • 22629' Ct R '4i 130.00' t ♦. N.S4 4 IL6O4' CZZ I'T 200.00' .S7' S9r4 7 14' / 4t.71 SOO'12.49'E 61.99' 3 1 TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION I i VOL. 9D13, PG. 2375 APPROVED PRELR4INARY PLAT RNARRON GOLF COURSE p1 LINE TM ARRON LAND CORPORATION VOL, 9913. K. 2375 APM1TYARR0/4GOLF WURSrE T / s4-^c•--r I > M4720'27'E CA V SCENTK2� 2627 P.R.T.C.T. .� � CnsnlAc u' .CCE55 TASDACNr FROIR YARD L T10AA i IwrAas LOunaK�i ' F 712 13 -. ¢ ArNK4 TALI 'sn.w 10' re• I �r 11 f ah:c+°:.i,°M 1 12 13 I I f (sa ".w -0P Y wa°°K, y 600° sr I V LE"M[7 I I s a Ira CHf rum sm ROD FOUND ('Aam I or RDO P AR10 _. cps GrPO LTPa1 no SET R. RALDM ISLE K dEMPK iIEROirMAIWIDLUICE MAWiiD- Dox arwa me Wow Nrort ACCESS EAlflICINT ORAL ACCESS EASad34T DETAIL LE LAIOOCAK 94DW TVPICAL ALL $D' low LOTS TYflCAL ALL 50, WIDE LOTS MAE molom m1K a Raw sAdomr p Sr1QT 1HAE taPNrK SE tbzro• Tmwoum PAD E040411R STATE Or Dou4 COLAOY or w~ KNO ALL OF LOTS 16-ZL ROOL 42 Or DE iRAAI PAT Or TRRRACK AOWF4h CK]COO NDML AN AM" 10 M CITY OF SOUTILAKL MOONED N CNINC A. LOE 2m -0 2W7 Or M PAr IOCOROS or UA w COMAY. NIA 1EItAR AS cowem 10 110" 1DI MILK V_ RCaOm 1. vO.wE t2412. PLDE lwl OF M CEO Ra01 I Or OAISIANI COtMY. TOOK NON. TOOCItE, MOM ALL MEN Or MY PMCMXM THAT N(51AN TINVAIN t "- ACTNO N me neouCN 11E M'evese"m in LY Al OLTHONDOES0 AMMT. DOES ADOPT TR PAT WC SNOM WOMNTNO M 1EA1DP ypR OESOR� Aryl FRDPOFn a lDTS Ilr TMU 211E ROCr Q APO oa..AaA O Rmt 4L lawrrON A 7dip1 C OCOR A TALL AN AOO90 ro M MCr Or SQlMARL TM1WR OOUNrT. TOIK OUt 0r M aN. oAfJ/t AoN- ,-.n TRA.SEMIDM 13 0 ��Or DTMM MT DOES KFEAw TM wOdW 0 Lars Cm ALTER OR AEAAOK OOSIPO DEED NESINCIIONS r 4r1 ON THE AMOP(AIY. WrMM YY (OM WOOS) AT SOUnAAl4 TANRAM COI/IK. TEXAS TW TE DM or t9i. STEW AM AUD4DM= ACM FOR SCS'TOON T06MW441. LP - STATE OF TONE COLOM or EOOIt K. M Vp(R4fj<D. A NODFTY PURJC N AFO FORM RATE OF TD1a. aN 716 D.r POyPA41T AFPEAAm AEK Y[T1S AARIAONRm A004f TOR P16fOLIR► iNMMo1l V.. IDIOT TO ME TO K M PE)ISON •HOSE WALE 4 SuaiCNlm TON TE Pumm 40 comm a 0, t EXVKSSm. AD N M CAP.a" rAPOM SMIED. APO a IK ACT AND Km a IAESIORA 11YMR0M. I.P. DENT UMM w )40 APO SEAL OF OFFICE THS - DAY OF 1910. . StAOE or TOIAS RATE r TCLS UMWf COMRY OF Son or taus COMM" 4r umnwT OO AU Or tADF T7. ROCK 42 Or le Mft PVr I TaRIR01P RIMM � NNOLE, AN AOORMI 10 M aF rr MO LAR. LTA N C/F[T A. S'M HTL r1e0P'ORli NO. �m N .00. /T R0. W/�K4129 or WE � � RKCRO! wm arRrwr, iERA3. RON, NwLiK MICE" ALL tar F • M PRlRS T1Hf Rr: TIROP{RIO. Tt1C.. ACMO F APO TMau H M U1001SIRR. R OILY AUINO® Amr, r0(f IW4 AN" Tr! PLAE Molm KRI I 1 99 IOL/N AaOiE SOaTTTm 1p PIIOPa1T a IOFS f7R M/ % ■OCK K K A1O 0M' C0tR1aP ORmi 44, 1♦IAMAI AOp11011 ORE7COrT TIOpIL AN ADMION A i Or SDurtaAl4 uRwNR WIRIrY. TE wa our a M a1. 1Maf RaEY. AEORMT NOWN-WS AND RppEwMlS if IM/10EAN � r�IAT DOES �KRE� M 00 Or Lon M /lT[R OR MYP! 04rStO OCED KSIMCT1o1Ts 1 AN't ON 11E PROri1TTY. HATLESS w (Oka) tRP 0 S) AT SOLRIAAIIR. T NMA T COWN. 104 MS M DAY or 'm ry A AmA WTZ rropo"Im NC - STATE Or T014 COURT or 001E ML M IAOOr90O. A NOTAF Pat M ArQ TOR M f1ARE OF TCV& ON iM5 OAT PpISdm1T APPDRm FAAMr MTL. OIOPAI 10 K 10 K M POrSON ObSE IM1[ 4 >t IaP M P1lOS[ APD CMFSDOwm IMDKN aRr65m APO M M CAPACM TaO11 STATED. ON" LOOM w WHO me UK or Orrcc TK - OAT of 904 ALL Or LOT V. BLOCK 42 OF M FOWL PUT Of IRWU1O1t AOOIIIOr DOCENT NOI'ALL AN ADORER ro M Crrc a< tOUItAAKE. TECOIOM N CQZ L SLOE ts2s AIO Ir27 a M PLO R[CCROS o 1Ar1R4R COLARr. Ica. AS COPPRKD A wr'ON L wom AND •AFC DN'E L V^jX pCW CED N MSTp%j Df M Di33007179 OF M KID) NOOMS OF 1*111UT COLMY. TOIAa NON. 11000AL H10w1 ALL MEN N NOW PRESENTS THAT RRM L RA1iE AIO wL DACE L KwAcL ACING F AMD T14AOUat 1K LPCEr51M®. DOES MOM ADOPT DNS PIA W." MI DESIGN." M DOWN Aao,C OESCr1lm PEN PROPOIIT a 1J)IS 17R iMN 27R. ROCK a APO COMMON aKEN 4S, 1RLARRON ADDITION CKSLE/R ROrALL AN ADWON TOM OM Or SOLRIRA M TAPP4R COUWrY. IoM" Our or M O.W. XmMR LRN.Y. A< OMM fEA50 O/D5151� L� S VIE O poeTHIS FL T DOESNCKAN M Or LOTS" OR ALTER OR RDO,, VOW, Ow IOTIRCIIONS 1 Aw ON M PI10rilrTY. zfTNESS w (OLI) wND(S) AT IMPKAW- T WANT COAAM. TOOK INS M DAY OF it". BRUN L *AWE UltQY w (OUP IM1OL5) Ar saRNM2 TWR ff CDLAR7. TEXa IIa M DAY OF NS{. 04a L R' STATE Or TEXAS cOLP4rr or @EroPE K. M LRIDERSPOED. • 1tOTARY Pat N MO TON M SLTE OF lvwL oN I74:s OAY POKMWLY mwi RTAM R. ROME aloom A 1E 10 K M PERSo., DOSE NNE K vAwmm FOR M PpPOK AMD comaM70N TimsiDt DOKSSO AND N M OVOCTY TO10t SUTEO. aYEN RAIDER w IVMD APO SEAL OF OFFIDL TM _ DAY OF 19P6- 5 CSTATE aO a Ki'OAE 1[. M LA10F119pEy, A 10TARr PaJC N A PoR 11E SM OF TEVC ON IM DAY P040NYLT APPEAR [1KE L RARE. KIIONI TO ME TO K M POKOM WM NAME 6 Stj@WWm FORM PUMPOSE AND CMKDOtMON 11OLDL OPIOSED AND N M CAlAOIT rMlON SIMm. ao4 LOW MY MONO 40 SM OF W= THS - DAY Or ISSL SLoveya 'S NOTES,- 1.) ALL COMAS AK S/1 PON NODS CAPPED 'CAMEP a PAINW SR UNLESS OrmcNwTs[ 1OVO. MEARWIM 2.) IICCOPKDMN IIYYMNMMI NADOR1dl Ol AA SM 17�01. Pmm. AS wam 3.) 9 Wi300* TIWP ONCCS CHQ.EIOS TMMAM ELEN.M06d7. a) TW WTS OF POOOMY AND ROOIP 9 M1 NDKCN S A OPMCAL AEYN 3017 ON OF A RSTUDY ST1 PE100MED Ft WnEN TEION & PJPGM. M M SUR010 NOT UXA7E M rIWP/P OANODDN.Y oN roc OROLW. KIQAPERT NOTES 1.) M, CRY a SCURAAK 140MS M Faod TO MOLM W"M FMSM POOP Br=ON Aw LOT CMRARm wrN1 INS AODMOPL rt mm" OE1Hros ON M MOST LtAI3lplr R101RAA11ON .RAALARE AT M THE ME PAT IS FEED AND TATTY K RTLECr TO CIPAPIK• AKFT1MMl LOES -" TITAN THOSE SIONI. moo ALSO K AILCCT To GHRIIAL F*m ROCK CmTOOA. 2.1 Au COLRIaN ORmL ARDS A/E ro K PIwAAi[ COMMD" AREAS OmKAim TO APO 1PAR4IAIED F M NOLOON1rRS AS90C•rRMI 3.) ALLLOTSWM TWIS PAT AMC SAW TO r"MMON OW A414 OCWVAPAENr 4.) 4L LIaSTRO srwxT M SwO L K AE O'•m. S.) SIiL)PO A Pp1110N a• ANY IA NI1N1 71a ADOrION F 1LTlS A10 EOLIrOS K A MOUTON a< STtlE TAN AIO CRT' ppNKE 40 4 AItOCT ro /PES 4O NM- HoliANO Or tR Lffa AND RAIOSPO PEPAIM L) TW ONQS OF 4L COMM WM LULL LAANIAN 110Nf T W"n N ACCOM NPCE INN M CRT 910111000M ORDPINIDE• 7.) .w..�NA �M FApwtpRaRO1S tAPOWEI -1/ORm Ta T5 • .m'�" a ITC aARoe a Ike aHear W L swr 1 1090110. KasivAm RIIOrQOOwti LAND spwmm N M Sm Or > 7�K. 00 1ORpY lgrWy T1HT M SIj@o.BON PAT SOMM KiEON ACINAIN1ELT Q OOttan9 TAE OOarm PROPEPrY AN K70"M F A 9MnlY NODE ON M 40CUM INGOT I" OIArC11ON AN*LJPYL�IIL AAO LpO" v wR fLpOROMP 001 OOPRtRi APO i /1/®� IOf-O► C9RDtr[ Y� RIIR1lOK AR r'ORIIS Q OIRurIR M tlgrARAO1IS A erPNQ SET OR Poua •RE rRlFtaelT TD o.LaE IipMCTOQ. F oam W all�� OILY a POCWNPED powca m k LAM VowfoR RAC ARSA IL Y L WUANTYDEOF DTCu AAS xx 2c Kr'01RL ML M LAO[RS1f.1O. A Mat"" PJ&g N AND TOR 119 STAR Or TOO& ON TM Our POr90wLLY APPGARD 4W S. �WW 0OW TO m 10 K M FA Odom WHOSE No 4 sussm"m AN THE PURPOSE Ate CNFSOOIAR1011 04M LOCO w MRC ARC SEAL or OFFICE rm _ DAY Or DpL C a APPODWO a ZONPIG c F M PLAN"• 2aN11C aARsssoPl WE F F CNARRIWI ' CrTY SECRETARY Q C APProAED F M C11,' or 9aDLA11E ,1 DATE 7 1AAYOP CrTY SECREIARY , PUT RLMSON MM' M PLAPPOSE Or TM AMOCO PLAT K M FOUORNP 1.) ro nM1Op1 M vRYAE NOM DRARwOE GLEE)tOR 4010 THEW" �9MT ALOLamM0 A 9 1m EXIT OrO► L0�171t-IIIL LOT 27 NO OOMMON GREW 46. STOCK 4L PLAT REVISION LOTS 17R THRU 27R, BLOCK 42 AND COMMON GREEN 45 TIMARRON ADDITION CRESCENT ROYALE AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS OUT OF THE M.W. DAVENPORT SURVEY. ABSTRACT NO. 43Z BEING AN AMENDMENT TO LOTS 17 THRU 27. COMMON GREEN 45. BLOCK 42. OF TIMARRON ADDITION CRESCENT ROYALE AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 2626 8 2627 11 RESIDENTIAL LOTS / 1 COMMON GREEN 3.075 ACRES OMMERS/DEVELOPERS: WESTERRA TIMARRON, L.P. RITZ PROPERTIES. INC. 7605 VIRGINIA PARKWAY P.O. BOX 93149 McKINNEY. TEXAS 75070 SOUTH-AKE. TEXAS 76092 (972) 529-5988 (817) 421-4488 BRYAN R. BURKE AND WIFE. ENICE 1. BURKE xxxx xxxx xxxx Q T XXXXXX. TEXAS 75Xxx v KJT/ (xxx) xxx-xxxx ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: = CarW- REG'D J !� L 1 1998 7PRR MRwL 9PR RN THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET _ . SLIDE FILE NO: APRIL 1998 Yon Jul 1S 13:26:34 1996 GENERAL FUND Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the period ended June 30, 1998 with comparative actual amounts for the period ended June 30, 1997 (fiscal month 9-75.00%) Adopted Percent Actual Percent Month Year to Date 1997/98 Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ ftEVEIYI IFS . t •: 1997/9/1 Budget ... •• 6/30/97 9/30/97 Expended Ad Valorem Taxes $55,237 $3,770,168 $4,036,234 93.4% $3,345,423 $3,464,261 96.6% Sales Tax 217,760 1,623,364 2,717,500 59.7% 1,176,582 1,930,016 61.0% Franchise Fees 181,558 821.855 801,030 102.6% 833,678 939,599 88.7% Fines 57,422 486,013 515,300 94.3% 364,098 509,328 71.5% Charges for Services 60,698 412,791 551,550 74.8% 259,031 354,555 73.1% Permits/Fees 240,064 2,119,763 2,264,710 93.6% 1,778,686 2,525,797 70.4% Miscellaneous 13,650 11,711 113,975 10.3% 119,210 130,203 91.6% Interest Income 10.677 130.094 155.000 83.9% 134.146 185.630 72.3% Total Revenues $837,066 $9,375,759 $11,155,299 84.0% $8,010,854 $10,039,389 79.8% EXPENDITURES City Secretary S16,900 $159,629 $241,365 66.1% $175,712 $242,575 72.4% Human Resources 21,356 153,041 172,288 88.8% 98,656 144,94/1 68.1% City Manager 24,221 241,016 362,173 66.5% 365,654 499,939 73.1% Support Services 107,694 1,047,278 1,211,717 86.4% 832,617 1,497,945 55.6% Community Services 32.172 241.651 368.934 65.5% Q Q 0.0% subtotal-General Govt.Dept. 202.343 j.842.615 2.356.477 78.2% 1.472.639 2.385.407 61.7% Finance 38,301 296,029 420,717 70.4% 330,374 418,017 79.0% Municipal Court 19,516 188,994 282,869 66.8% 172,206 253,010 68.1% Municipal Court-Teen Court 5.057 39.752 55.936 71.1% 32.619 48.370 67.4% subtotal-Finance Dept. 62.874 524.775 759.522 69.1% 535.199 719.397 74.4% Fire 158,232 1,195,113 1,569,067 76.2% 890.202 1.460,111 61.0% Police 217,764 1,963,771 2,681.325 73.2% 1,593,117 2,242,915 71.0% Public Safety Support 85.759 691.303 1.010.948 68.4% 686.52a 975.419 70.4% Lipe,subtotal-Public Safety Dept. 461.755 3.850.187 5.261.340 73.2% 3.169.847 4.678.445 67.8% Building Inspection 42.282 381,905 605,723 63.0% 328,554 474,511 69.2% Streets/Drainage 62,569 549.518 927,057 59.3% 526,324 903,988 58.2% Public Works Administration 37.224 549.343 873.719 62.9% 472.418 690.191. 68.4% subtotal-Public Works Dept. 142.075 1.480.766 2.406.499 61.5% 1.327.296 2.068.690 64.2% Parks and Recreation Dept. 140.873 769.006 1.318.066 58.3% 652.838 1.013.013 64.4% Community Development 40,598 338,488 573,514 59.0% 335,608 463,551 72.4% Economic Development 8.642 72.044 116.975 61.6% 61.519 90.319 68.1% subtotal-Community Development 49.247 410.532 690.489 59.5% 397.127 553.870 71.7% Total Expenditures $1.059.167 $8.877.881 $12.792.393 69.4% $7.554.946 $11.418.822 66.2% Excess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenditures ($222,101) $497,878 ($1,637,094) $455,908 ($1,379,433) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND(USES) Proceeds from C.O.Sale(net) $715,547 $715,547 $715,547 $842,184 $990,382 Transfer In-Other Funds 58.333 528.697 700.000 Q 633.000 Total Other Sources/(Uses) $773,880 $1,244,244 $1,415,547 $842,184 $1,623,382 Excess(deficiency)of Revenues/other sources over Exp. $551.779 S1.742.122 (S221.547) $1.298.092 S243.949 FUND BALANCE OCT 1 $2,597,602 $2,597,602 $2,353,653 $2,353,653 ENDING FUND BALANCE S4.339.724 $2.376.055 S3.651.745 $2.597.602 fund balance percentage 18.6% 22.7% L ..... •.... jun98.xls WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRLSE FUND Comparative Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ended June 30, 1998 and June 30, 1997 (fiscal month 9-75.00%) Adopted Percen Actual Percent Month Year to Date 1997/98 Collected/ Year to Date Total Collected/ REVENUES 1997/QR Budget A..",. 6/30/97 9/30/97 E al Water Sales-residential $587,860 $3,394,873 $4,887,500 69.5% $2,470,533 $4,425,797 55.8% Water Sales-commercial 98,362 567,234 701,500 80.9% 396,819 657,807 60.3% Sewer Sales 96,477 730,377 920,000 79.4% 561,145 811,624 69.1% Sanitation Sales 54,053 469,619 534,000 87.9% 369,241 508,724 72.7% Other utility charges 50,149 308,864 359,000 86.0% 294,279 409,950 71.8% Miscellaneous 93 42,885 91,600 46.8% 46,797 92,063 50.8% Interest Income Ufa 56,422 77,QQQ 72.8% 56.434 a,1Q6 73.1% Total Revenues S891,196 $5,569,944 $7,570,600 73.6% $4,195,248 $6,982,661 60.1% EXPENSES Water S318,973 $2,117,738 $4,426,137 47.8% $2,263,198 $3,971,926 57.0% Sewer 127,826 535,442 795,475 67.3% 647,557 727,546 89.0% Sanitation 42,052 325,160 500,000 65.0% 291,547 445,205 65.5% Debt Service- Revenue Bonds 76.137 1.263.526 2.062.490 61.3% 1.264.523 1.817.529 69.6% Total Expenses $564,988 $4,241,866 $7,784,102 54.5% $4,466,825 $6,962,206 64.2% Excess(deficiency)of Revenue over Expenses $326.204 51.328.07a j$213.502) I$271.57'71 520.455 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND QJSESI Transfer In-Other Funds 569,512 $625,608 $834,145 5523,628 $698,170 Transfer Out-Other Funds (583331 (524.997) (700.000) Q (633.000) (toe Total Other Sources/(Uses) S11.179 $100,611 $134,145 S523,628 $65,170 Excess(deficiency)of Revenues and other sources over Expenses 5337.387 $1.428.689 ($79.3571 $252.051 $85.625 L jun98.xls MY OF S1OUTIRA E HISTORICAL SALES TAX REVENUES 1997-96 collected budget balance MINI S110112 NOM t 21715 000 21 823.482 1891 511 32.84% FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Iry MONTH 93/94 -Dec 94/95 -Dec 95/96 -Dec 96-97 , -Oec , 97-98 -Dec October 399,408 95.1% S89,951 -9.5% 3128,689 43.1% S161,892 25.8% 3237,164 46 November 50,623 20.2% 52.099 29% 111.917 114.8% 135.367 , 21.0% 193,664 43 December 70,155 107.3% 67,243 -4.2% 103,975 54.6% 115,064 10.7% 163,871 42 January 106,541 57.3% 95,687 -10.2% 140.362 46.7% 198,873 41.7% 266,437 34 February 57,839 47.0% 68,015 17.8% 95,269 40.1% 125.671 31.9% 168.914 34 Mardi 59,378 34.4% 56,600 -4.7% 103,163 823% 104,733 1.5% 160,147 52 April 87,438 27.3% 88,212 0.9% 137,030 55.3% 182384 33.1% 215,299 18 May 58.291 67% 81,109 39.1% 109,371 34.8% 152,577 39.5% 217,760 42 'first month of 1/2 cent sales tax June 59,577 14.5% 83,253 39.7% 112,317 34.9% 171,813 53.0% 200,233 16 July 94,157 16.9% 135.187 43.6% 179.803 33.0% 223,854 24.5% 0 -10C August 58,980 22.1% 109,584 85.8% 132,367 20.8% 184,851 39.7% 0 -10C September 7s.228 38.3% 106.563 41.7% 122.445, 14.9% 173.917 420% Q -10C TOTAL 5877,615 37.8% S1,033,502 17.8% S1,476,708 42.9% S1,931,017 30.8% S1,823,489 35 (111110re . SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1997-98 collected budget balance Masi tt2.date balance meant 31.357,500 ;911.746 S445.754 32.84% FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %Inc YEAR %In MONTH 93/94 -Dec 94195 -Dec 95/96 -Dec 96-97 -Dec 97-98 -Dec October S0 Na $44,975 Na $64,344 43.1% S80,948 25.8% S118,582 46 November 0 Na 26,049 Na 55,958 114.8% 67,684 21.0% 96,832 4:. December 0 Na 33,622 n/a 51,987 54.6% 57,542 10.7% 81,935 42 January 0 n/a 47,843 Na 70,181 46.7% 99,437 41.7% 133,219 34 February 0 Na 34.007 Na 47,635 40.1% 62,836 31.9% 84,457 3< March 0 Na 28,300 Na 51,581 82.3% 52,366 1.5% 80,074 5:. April 0 Na 44,106 Na • 68,515 55.3% 91,192 33.1% 107,650 18 May 29,145 Na 40,554 39.1% 54,686 34.8% 76.289 39.5% 108,880 4: June 29,788 Na 41,627 39.7% 56,159 34.9% 85,906 53.0% 100,117 1t July 47.079 Na 67,593 43.6% 89,901 33.0% 111,927 24.5% 0 -10( August 29.490 Na 54,792 85.8% 66,184 20.8% 92,426 39.7% 0 -10c September 37.614 Na 53.282 41.7% 81.223 14.9% 86.958, 42.0% Q -1a TOTAL 3173,116 n/a S516,751 198.5% S738.354 42.9% S965,508 30.8% 3911,746 3: 7n7/9e SLSTAXIA.S CITY OF SOUTHMAKE Saks Tau Anoka. FY1997-96 Actual Budget Ached Estimated (budget-eat) % Month1996-97 Mae ]�Z:96 Mall Mho= Samoa ope October 161.892 211.176 237.164 237,164 25,988 12.31% November 136,367 180.872 193.664 193.664 12.992 7.19% . December 115,084 157.347 183,871 163,871 8,524 4.15% January 198.373 253.704 266,437 266.437 12,733 5.02% February 125,871 169.522 163,914 168,914 (608) -0.36% March 104,733 145.443 160.147 160,147 14.704 10.11% April 162,384 234.742 213.299 215,299 (19,443) -8.28% May 152,577 200,464 217,760 217.760 17,296 8.63% June 171.613 222,585 200.233 200,233 (22,352) -10.04% July 223,354 262,432 0 282,432 0 0.00% August 184,851 333.186 0 333,186 0 0.00% September 173,917 221722 Q 2217211 Q 0.00% 1,931,016 2,715,000 1,823,489 2,762,836 47.836 1.76% 40.60% 43.08% Sauthlalce Parks 06vabpment Corporation 112 cent sass tau Actual Budget Achosl Estimated (budget-est) % 1996-97 1997-96 Mai 1997-98 gittmonne Chanon October 80,948 105,588 118,582 118,582 12,994 12.31% November 67.884 90.336 96.832 96,832 6,496 7.19% December 57,542 73.673 81,935 81,935 3,262 4.15% January 99,437 126,352 133,219 133,219 6,367 5.02% February 62.836 34,761 84,457 84,457 (304) -0.36% March 52.367 72,721 80,074 80,074 7,352 10.11% April 91.192 117.371 107,650 107,650 (9,721) -8.28% May 76,289 100,232 108,880 108,880 8,648 8.63% June 65,907 111,292 100,117 100,117 (11,178) -10.04% July 111,927 141,216 0 141,218 0 0.00% . August 92,426 166,593 0 166,593 0 0.00% September 86.959 161.664 Q 161.884 Q 0.00% 965,508 1,357,500 911,745 1,381.418 23,918 1.76% 40.60% 43.08% L 7/17ree stsrxtaaXL: ti City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 16, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, Deputy Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Town Square Status Report Town Square Progress continues on the infrastructure and commercial elements of this project. Slot inlets located in the paved areas are being installed. Parking lot paving is scheduled to begin mid-July. Parking lot curb and gutter in the lot west of Buildings lA and 1B is underway. Street paving is scheduled to begin mid-August. Six buildings are currently under construction. Buildings 1A, 1B 5A and 5B have had 14 steel erected, building 4C has had the slab poured and steel delivered, and building 2C - has had the piers poured and foundations will be poured this week. Brick has been delivered for buildings lA and 1B and brick installation has begun on 1A. The exterior sheathing for building lA is complete, mechanical and plumbing rough-in is underway, interior framing and sheetrock in the public areas is being constructed. The Developer did not submit plans for the Bandshell Pavilion by July 13. This process will be delayed by at least two weeks due to this situation. Town gm No additional action has been undertaken on the programming booklet for the Town Hall pending the July 27 meeting of CISD. Staff is continuing to work with Urban ecture in refining and developing the scope of services for design of the facility. RJH/rjh d:\wd-files\sts\stat3.doc - 4e �5 City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Shang Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-52,Revisions to Resolution No. 97-75,Authorizing the Mayor to execute the D.A.R.E. Grant,2"d year funding. In December 1997 we made application with the Criminal Justice Division (CJD), Office of the Governor of Texas, for the 2" and 3rd year grant funding for the DARE Officer. As a part of that process, the City Council adopted Resolution 97-75 supporting the application. We have received notice of some adjustments prior to final approval. Although it has never before been required in any grant application, the current review panel made a request for wording that would guarantee the refund of money if it was misused. Even though we had wording in the original resolution that stated"we would comply with all of the requirements" of the grant program, they continue to request a revised resolution. Therefore, the attached Resolution No. 98-52 is provided in compliance with their request. I am available for any additional questions or comments. LiC - BC/bls Attachment 5A-1 (iire RESOLUTION NO. 98-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,REVISING RESOLUTION 97-75 IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION FOR RELATED GRANT FUNDS FOR A D.AR.E. OFFICER THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION OF THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake concurs with efforts to make America's neighborhoods safe places in which to grow, live, and work, and WHEREAS, the Criminal Justice Division of the Governor's Office provides funding for programs designed to assist communities in the development of innovative, locally-designed, long-term community policing programs designed to promote community-based problem-solving, prevent crime, and enhance public safety with a focus on the youth, and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has adopted Resolution 97-75 in support of this program and to conform to all of the requirements of such grant program upon being awarded such funding, and WHEREAS,the City of Southlake agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of the Criminal Justice Division funds the City of Southlake assures that the funds will be returned to the Criminal Justice Division in full, L NOW, THEREFO RE,ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Southlake, that the City Council of Southlake, Texas revises Resolution 97-75 to reflect continued support for the application for related grant funds through the Criminal Justice Division of the Governor's Office, and authorizes the Southlake Department of Public Safety to apply for grant funding for the continuation of existing programs and development of initiatives consistent with those program goals. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE_DAY OF , 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary L 5A-2 City of Southlake,Texas Lipe' MEMORANDUM July 16, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Darcey Imm, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Authorize Mayor to enter into a lease agreement with Carroll Independent School District for space within Town Hall Attached is a lease agreement which is substantially the same as the draft presented to Council at their July 7 meeting. As recommended by Council, Section 10.02 C. has been added to address the costs involved in modifying the space should CISD decrease or vacate their lease space. The other modifications are minor and include defining the Security Deposit (Sections 1.07 and 3.03), delineating the time that the first payment is due (Section 3.02), detailing the term of the lease (Section 1.05), and clarifying some definitions. The attachments and some of the specifics referred to within the document will not be able to be finalized until we are certain of CISD's participation. These can be determined relatively quickly once the contract is approved by both entities. lease contact me with any questions or concerns regarding this agreement. DAI L WAS • Lease Agreement Between City of Southlake and Carroll Independent School District IN CONSIDERATION of the agreements set forth in this Lease,the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE: DEFINED TERMS. As used in this Lease Agreement(the "Lease"),the terms set forth in this Article One have the following respective meanings: 1.01 Effective Date: The last date set forth by the signatures of Landlord and Tenant on page below. 1.02 Landlord: City of Southlake Address: 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard Southlake, Texas 76092 1.03 Tenant: Carroll Independent School District co, Address: 1201 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 1.04 Demised Premises: The area outlined on Exhibit A containing approximately square feet, together with the right to utilize the Joint Use Areas, as described in Article 14 hereof, and a one-third interest in the common area space. A. Street address: 1000 Main Street Southlake, Texas 76092 B. Floor Plan: Being a floor area of approximately 23,000 square feet distributed throughout the Town Hall facility and being more particularly shown in outline form on Exhibit A, FLOOR PLAN. C. Legal description: The property on which the Demised Premises is situated (the "Property") is more particularly described as Block 6 of Southlake Town Square or is described in Exhibit B, SURVEY AND/OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION. 1.05 Lease Term: The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of twenty(20) years beginning on (the"Commencement Date")and ending on (the"Expiration Date"). During this period,rent shall include both Capital Costs and (7/17/98) Page 1 (we Operating Expenses. This Agreement shall be automatically extended for additional five (5) year periods, unless terminated in writing by either party at least sixty(60) days prior to the end of the original term or any extension thereof. During these renewal periods,the rent shall only consist of the Operating Expenses. 1.06 Rent: Rent for the lease term shall be payable in annual installments to be due on October 1 of each year. The annual rent shall be equal to a percentage of the cost of the annual bond debt payment for the facility, said percentage to be equal to the ratio of the CISD floor space to the total floor space in the building, and one-third of the annual Operating Expenses, each to be calculated based upon the formulas set forth in Exhibits C and D, attached hereto and incorporated herein. The first rental payment shall include Operating Expenses incurred from the date of commencement of construction. 1.07 Security Deposit: The Security Deposit shall be equal to one-half of the annual rent and shall be due on the date a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the Demised Premises. [See Section 3.03]. 1.08 Permitted Use: Administrative offices. 1.09 Operating expense means expenses incurred by the Landlord for the following: A. Electric, Water and Wastewater Utility Services to the Property; B. Removal of Solid Waste from the Property; C. Property, General Liability, and Casualty Insurance Premiums for the Property; and D. Maintenance of the Property, including keeping the roof, skylights, foundation, structural components and the structural portions of exterior walls of the Property in good order,condition and repair, maintaining or repairing windows,doors,overhead doors,plate glass or the surfaces of walls but not limited to maintenance,repairs and all necessary replacements of the windows, plate glass, doors, overhead doors, heating system, ventilating equipment, air conditioning equipment, electrical and lighting systems, fire protection sprinkler system, dock levelers, elevators, interior and exterior plumbing, the interior of the Property in general, pest control and extermination, downspouts, gutters,paving,railroad siding, care of landscaping and regular mowing of grass, and including the exterior of the Property. This shall include the expenses incurred by the Landlord in contracting or hiring employees to perform these maintenance services; and E. Any assessment or fee relating to the Property imposed by any government having jurisdiction over the Property. (7/17/98) Page 2 56-3 F. Any expense described in this Lease as an Operating Expense. 1.10. Joint Use Area means the meeting rooms,restrooms,break rooms, conference rooms, court rooms,council board chambers located in the Town Hall. These areas are shared by the City of Southlake and Carroll Independent School District. 1.11 Property means the Town Hall building to be constructed and located at 1000 Main Street, including the Demised Premises, the grounds adjacent thereto, the sidewalks and parking area, as shown on Exhibit A . 1.12 Capital Costs means the capital costs of construction of the infrastructure necessary to serve the Property and construction of the Town Hall,in accordance with the Phase One of the Tax Increment Financing Plan of the Tax Increment Financing District of Southlake. 1.13 Common Area means entryway, sidewalks, employee break rooms, restrooms, designated reception areas located throughout the Property. These areas are shared by the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, and Carroll Independent School District. ARTICLE TWO: LEASE AND LEASE TERM (6.0, 2.01 Lease of Demised Premises for Lease Term. Landlord leases the Demised Premises to Tenant and Tenant leases the Demised Premises from Landlord for the Lease Term stated in Section 1.05. The Commencement Date is the date specified in Section 1.05, unless advanced or delayed under any provision of this Lease. 2.02 Early Occupancy. If Tenant occupies the Demised Premises prior to the Commencement Date,Tenant's occupancy of the Demised Premises shall be subject to all of the provisions of this Lease. 2.03 Holding Over. Tenant shall vacate the Demised Premises immediately upon the expiration of the Lease Term or earlier termination of the Lease. Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for and indemnify Landlord against all damages incurred by Landlord as a result of any delay by Tenant in vacating the Demised Premises. If Tenant does not vacate the Demised Premises upon the expiration of the Lease Term or earlier termination of this Lease,Tenant's occupancy of the Demised Premises shall be a day-to-day tenancy and Tenant shall vacate the Demised Premises on receipt of notice from Landlord. This paragraph shall not be construed as Landlord's consent for Tenant to hold over or to extend this Lease. ARTICLE THREE: RENT AND SECURITY DEPOSIT 3.01 Manner of Payment. All sums payable under this Lease by Tenant (the "Rent") shall be made payable to the Landlord at the address designated in Section 1.02, unless another (7/17/98) Page 3 person is designated in Section 1.10, or to any other party or address as Landlord may designate in writing. The Rent is the minimum rent for the Demised Premises and is subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Lease. 3.02 Time of Payment. On the date a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the Demised Premises,Tenant shall pay the installment of Rent for the first year of the Lease Term. On or before the first day of the second year of the Lease Term and of each year thereafter, the installation of Rent and other sums due under this Lease shall be due and payable, in advance,without off-set, deduction or prior demand. If the Lease Term commences or ends on a day other than the first or last day of October,the rent for any fractional calendar month following the Commencement Date or preceding the end of the Lease Term shall be prorated. 3.03 Security Deposit. Upon execution of this Lease,Tenant shall deposit with Landlord a cash Security Deposit in the amount stated in Section 1.07. Landlord may apply all or part of the Security Deposit to any unpaid Rent or other charges due from Tenant or to cure any other defaults of Tenant. If Landlord uses any part of the Security Deposit, Tenant shall restore the Security Deposit to its full amount within ten(10)days after Landlord's written demand. Tenant's failure to restore the full amount of the Security Deposit within the time specified shall be a default under this Lease. No interest will be paid on the Security Deposit. Upon any termination of this Lease not resulting from Tenant's default, and after Tenant has vacated the Property and cleaned and restored the Demised Premises in the manner required by this Lease. ARTICLE FOUR: INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY 4.01 Casualty Insurance. During the Lease Term,Landlord shall maintain policies of insurance covering loss of or damage to the Demised Premises in an amount or percentage of replacement value as Landlord deems reasonable in relation to the age, location, type of construction and physical condition of the Demised Premises and the availability of insurance at reasonable rates. The minimum amounts of such insurance policies shall be as follows: INSERT AMOUNTS The policies shall provide protection against all perils included within the classification of fire and extended coverage and any other perils which Landlord deems necessary. This expense shall be an Operating Expense. Tenant shall, at Tenant's expense,maintain insurance on its fixtures, equipment and building improvements as Tenant deems necessary to protect Tenant's interest. Tenant shall not do or permit to be done anything which invalidates any insurance policies. Any casualty insurance carried by Landlord or Tenant shall be for the sole benefit of the party carrying the insurance and under its sole control,provided that any benefits paid under the casualty insurance policies paid for as an Operating Expense shall be applied for the benefit of both parties. Tenant shall be responsible for insurance on Tenant's personal property. 4.02 Increase in Premiums. Tenant shall not permit any operation or activity to be conducted, or storage or use of any volatile or any other materials, on or about the Demised Premises (7/17/98) Page 4 s/3-s that would cause suspension or cancellation of any fire and extended coverage insurance policy carried by Landlord, or increase the premiums therefor, without the prior written consent of Landlord. 4.03 Liability Insurance. During the Lease Term,Landlord may maintain a commercial general liability policy of insurance,at Tenant's expense,insuring Tenant against liability arising out of the ownership,use,occupancy, or maintenance of the Demised Premises. Such insurance policies shall be an Operating Expense. Landlord shall name Tenant as an additional insured under a comprehensive policy of commercial general liability insurance maintained by Landlord, with the following minimum amounts. INSERT AMOUNTS OF TML COVERAGE Landlord shall deliver a copy of the policy or certificate (or a renewal) to Landlord prior to the Commencement Date and prior to the expiration of the policy during the Lease Term. Tenant may, at Tenant's expense, maintain other liability insurance as Tenant deems necessary to protect Tenant. 4.04 Releases. Landlord shall not be liable to Tenant or to Tenant's employees, agents, invites or visitors,or to any other person for any injury to persons or damage to property on or about the Demised Premises or any adjacent area owned by Landlord caused by the negligence or misconduct of Tenant,Tenant's employees, subtenants, agents, licensees or concessionaires or any other person entering the Demised Premises under express or implied invitation of Tenant, or arising out of the use of the Demised Premises by Tenant and the conduct of (kapie Tenant's business, or arising out of any breach or default by Tenant in the performance of Tenant's obligations under this Lease. Tenant shall not be liable for any injury or damage caused by the negligence or misconduct of Landlord, or Landlord's employees or agents. 4.05 Comparative Negligence. Tenant and Landlord hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to indemnify, defend, and hold each other harmless, to the extent of each parry's comparative negligence,if any, from and against any and all loss, liability, demand, damage, judgment, suit, claim, deficiency, interest, fee, charge, cost or expense (including, without limitation, interest, court costs and penalties, reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements and amounts paid in settlement, or liabilities resulting from any change in federal, state or local law or regulation or interpretation of this Lease) of whatever nature, on a comparative negligence basis,even when caused in part by Landlord's or Tenant's negligence or the joint or concurring negligence of Landlord, Tenant, and any other person or entity, which may result or to which Landlord or Tenant and/or any of their officers, agents, directors, employees,subsidiaries,partners,licensees and counsel may sustain, suffer, incur or become subject to in connection with or arising in any way whatsoever out of the leasing, operation, promotion,management, maintenance, repair, use or occupation of the Demised Premises, or any other activity of whatever nature in connection therewith, or arising out of or by reason of any investigation, litigation or other proceedings brought or threatened, arising out of or based upon the leasing, operation, promotion, management, maintenance, repair, use or occupancy of the Demised Premises, or any other activity on the Demised Premises. This provision shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. (7/17/98) Page 5 4.06 Waiver of Subrogation. Each party to this Lease waives any claim which arises or may arise in its favor against the other party during the term of this Lease for any and all loss of, or damage to, any of its property located within or upon, or constituting a part of, the Demised Premises, which loss or damage is covered by valid and collectible fire and extended coverage insurance policies, to the extent that such loss or damage is recoverable under such insurance policies. These mutual waivers shall be in addition to, and not in limitation or derogation of, any other waiver or release contained in this Lease with respect to any loss of, or damage to,property of the parties. Inasmuch as these mutual waivers will preclude the assignment of any aforesaid claim by way of subrogation or otherwise to an insurance company (or any other person), each party hereby agrees to give immediately to each insurance company (which has issued to such party policies of fire and extended coverage insurance) written notice of the terms of such mutual waivers, and to cause such insurance policies to be properly endorsed to prevent the invalidation of the insurance coverage by reason of these waivers. ARTICLE FIVE: USE OF DEMISED PREMISES 5.01 Permitted Use. Tenant may use the Demised Premises only for the Permitted Use stated in Section 1.09. 5.02 Compliance with the Law. Tenant shall comply with all governmental laws, ordinances and regulations applicable to the use of the Demised Premises, and shall promptly comply with all governmental orders and directives for the correction,prevention, and abatement of nuisances and other activities in or upon, or connected with the Demised Premises, all at Tenant's sole expense, including any expense or cost resulting from the construction or installation of fixtures and improvements or other accommodations for handicapped or disabled persons required for compliance with governmental laws and regulations, including but not limited to V.A.C.S. art. 9102, and any successor statute, and the Americans with Disabilities Act(the "ADA"). To the extent any alterations to the Demised Premises or to areas outside the Demised Premises are required by the ADA or other applicable laws or regulations, Landlord shall make the required alterations. The expense of the alterations shall be an Operating Expense. 5.03 Certificate of Occupancy. Tenant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the City prior to occupancy of the Demised Premises. Tenant may apply for a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the Commencement Date. 5.04 Signs. Without the prior written consent of Landlord, Tenant may not place any signs, ornaments or other objects upon the Demised Premises or on the Property, including but not limited to the interior,roof or exterior of the building or other improvements on the Property, or paint or otherwise decorate or deface the exterior of the building. Any signs installed by Tenant must conform with applicable laws. Tenant must remove all signs, decorations and ornaments at the expiration or termination of this Lease and must repair any damage and (lbw' (7/17/98) Page 6 (6r, close any holes caused by the removal. 5.06 Landlord's Access. Landlord and Landlord's agents, employees or contractors, shall have the right to, during normal business hours and upon reasonable advance notice, and without unreasonably interfering with Tenant's business,enter the Demised Premises; (a) to inspect the general condition and state of repair of the Demised Premises, (b) to make repairs required or permitted under this Lease, (c)to show the Demised Premises or the Property to any prospective tenant or purchaser, and (d) for any other reasonable purpose. If Tenant changes the locks on the Demised Premises, Tenant must provide Landlord with a copy of each separate key. 5.07 Possession. If Tenant pays the rent,properly maintains the Demised Premises,and complies with all other terms of this Lease, Tenant may occupy and enjoy the Demised Premises for the full Lease Term, subject to the provisions of this Lease. 5.08 Exemption from Liability. Landlord shall not be liable for any damage or injury to the persons,business(or any loss of income),goods,inventory,furnishings,fixtures,equipment, merchandise or other property of Tenant, Tenant's employees, invitees, customers or any other person in or about the Demised Premises, whether the damage or injury is caused by or results from: (a) fire, steam, electricity, water, gas or wind; (b) the breakage, leakage, obstruction or other defects of pipes,sprinklers,wires,appliances,plumbing,air conditioning (impe or lighting fixtures or any other cause; (c) conditions arising on or about the Demised Premises or upon other portions of any building of which the Demised Premises is a part, or from other sources or places; or(d) any act or omission of any other tenant of any building on the Property. Landlord shall not be liable for any damage or injury even though the cause of or the means of repairing the damage or injury are not accessible to Tenant. The provisions of this Section shall not,however, exempt Landlord from liability for Landlord's gross negligence or willful misconduct. ARTICLE SIX: PROPERTY CONDITION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS 6.01 Acceptance of Demised Premises. Before the Occupancy Date, Tenant will acknowledge that: (a)a full and complete inspection of the Demised Premises and adjacent common areas has been made and Landlord has fully and adequately disclosed the existence of any defects which would interfere with Tenant's use of the Demised Premises for their intended purpose, and (b) as a result of such inspection and disclosure, Tenant has taken possession of the Demised Premises and accepts the Demised Premises in its "As Is" condition. 6.02 Maintenance and Repair. Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, Landlord shall be under no obligation to perform any repair, maintenance or management service in the Demised Premises or adjacent common areas. Tenant shall be fully responsible, at its expense, for all repair, maintenance and management services other than those which are (7/17/98) Page 7 Sig-8 (re expressly assumed by Landlord. A. Landlord's Obligation. (1) Subject to the provisions of Article Seven (Damage and Destruction) and Article Eight(Condemnation)and except for damage caused any act or omission of Tenant, Landlord shall maintain the Property in good condition and repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Landlord shall not be obligated to prepare or clean any conference room or other Joint Use Area facility that Tenant may use. Further, Landlord is not required to make any repairs under this Section until a reasonable time after receipt of written notice from Tenant of the need for repairs. If any repairs are required to be made by Landlord, Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense,promptly remove Tenant's furnishings, fixtures, inventory, equipment and other property, to the extent required to enable Landlord to make repairs. Landlord's liability under this Section shall be limited to the cost of those repairs or corrections. (2) All repair,maintenance, management and other services to be performed by Landlord or Landlord's agents involve the exercise of professional judgment by service providers, and Tenant expressly waives any claims for breach of warranty arising from the performance of those services. B. Tenant's Obligation. (1) Subject to the provisions of Section 6.01 and Sections 6.02A, Tenant shall, at all times, keep all other portions of the Demised Premises in good order, condition and repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted, including, In addition, Tenant shall, at Tenant's expense, repair any damage to any portion of the Property, including the roof, foundation, or structural components and exterior walls of the Demised Premises caused by Tenant's acts or omissions. If Tenant fails to maintain and repair the Property as required by this Section, Landlord may, on ten (10) days' prior written notice, enter the Demised Premises and perform the maintenance or repair on behalf of Tenant, except that no notice is required in case of emergency, and Tenant shall reimburse Landlord immediately upon demand for all costs incurred in performing the maintenance or repair. 6.03 Alterations, Additions and Improvements. Tenant shall not create any openings in the roof or exterior walls, or make any alterations, additions or improvements to the Demised Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord. Consent for non-structural alterations, additions or improvements shall not be unreasonably withheld by Landlord. Tenant may erect or install trade fixtures, shelves,bins, and machinery provided that Tenant complies with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations. At the expiration or termination of this Lease, Tenant shall, subject to the restrictions of Section 6.05 below, have the right to remove items installed by Tenant,provided Tenant is not in default at the time of the removal and provided further that Tenant shall, at the time of (7/17/98) Page 8 5/9- ? (hire removal of the items, repair in good and workmanlike manner any damage caused by the installation or removal. Tenant shall pay for all costs incurred or arising out of alterations, additions or improvements in or to the Demised Premises and shall not permit any mechanic's or materialman's lien to be filed against the Demised Premises or the Property. 6.04 Condition upon Termination. Upon the expiration of this Lease, Tenant shall surrender the Demised Premises to Landlord broom clean and in the same condition as received,except for ordinary wear and tear which Tenant is not otherwise obligated to remedy under any provisions of this Lease. Tenant shall not be obligated to repair any damage which Landlord is required to repair under Article Six (Property Condition) or Article Seven (Damage or Destruction). In addition, Landlord may require Tenant to remove any alterations, additions or improvements (whether or not made with Landlord's consent) prior to the expiration or termination of this Lease and to restore the Demised Premises to its prior condition, all at Tenant's expense. All alterations, additions and improvements which Landlord has not required Tenant to remove shall become Landlord's property and shall be surrendered to Landlord upon the expiration or termination of this Lease. In no event, however, shall Tenant remove any of the following materials or equipment without Landlord's prior written consent: (i)any electrical wiring or power panels; (ii) lighting or lighting fixtures; (iii) wall coverings, drapes, blinds or other window coverings; (iv) carpets or other floor coverings; (v)heating,ventilating, or air conditioning equipment; (vi) fencing or security gates; or(vii) any other fixtures,equipment or items which, if removed, would affect the operation or the exterior appearance of the Property. 6.05 Access. Tenant shall have access to the Demised Premises twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. The Tenant shall have the ability to have access to air conditioning and heating equipment function in the Demised Premises, whether or not such equipment is being operated elsewhere on the Property. ARTICLE SEVEN: DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION 7.01 Notice. If any buildings or other improvements situated on the Property are damaged or destroyed by fire,flood,windstorm,tornado or other casualty,Tenant shall immediately give written notice of the damage or destruction to Landlord. 7.02 Partial Damage. If the building or other improvements situated on the Demised Premises are damaged by fire,tornado, or other casualty,this Lease shall not terminate, but Landlord shall proceed with reasonable diligence to rebuild or repair the building and other improvements on the Demised Premises(other than leasehold improvements made by Tenant or any assignee, subtenant or other occupant of the Demised Premises)to substantially the condition in which they existed prior to the damage. Landlord may, at Landlord's option, terminate this Lease by promptly delivering a written termination notice to Tenant, in which event the Rent shall be abated for the unexpired portion of the Lease Term, effective from the date of receipt by Landlord of the written notification of the damage. To the extent the Lao, (7/17/98) Page 9 .5,3/c Demised Premises cannot be occupied(in whole or in part)following the casualty,the Rent payable under this Lease during the period in which the Demised Premises cannot be fully occupied shall be adjusted equitably. 7.03 Substantial or Total Destruction. If the building or other improvements situated on the Demised Premises are substantially or totally destroyed by fire, tornado, or other casualty, or so damaged that rebuilding or repairs cannot reasonably be completed within one hundred twenty (120) days from the date Landlord receives written notification by Tenant of the occurrence of the damage, either Landlord or Tenant may terminate this Lease by promptly delivering a written termination notice to the other party, in which event the monthly installments of Rent shall be abated for the unexpired portion of the Lease Term, effective from the date of the damage or destruction. If neither party promptly terminates this Lease, Landlord shall proceed with reasonable diligence to rebuild and repair the building and other improvements (except that Tenant shall rebuild and repair Tenant's fixtures and improvements in the Demised Premises). To the extent the Demised Premises cannot be occupied (in whole or in part) following the casualty, the Rent payable under this Lease during the period in which the Demised Premises cannot be fully occupied shall be adjusted equitably. ARTICLE EIGHT: CONDEMNATION L, If, during the Lease Term all or a substantial part of the Demised Premises are taken for any public or quasi-public use under any governmental law, ordinance or regulation or by right of eminent domain, or are conveyed to the condemning authority under threat of condemnation,this Lease shall terminate and the annual installments of Rent shall be abated during the unexpired portion of the Lease Term, effective from the date of the taking. If less than a substantial part of the Demised Premises is taken for public or quasi-public use under any governmental law, ordinance or regulation, or by right of eminent domain, or is conveyed to the condemning authority under threat of condemnation, Landlord, at its option, may by written notice terminate this Lease. If Landlord does not terminate this Lease, Landlord shall promptly, at Landlord's expense, restore and reconstruct the buildings and improvements(other than leasehold improvements made by Tenant situated on the Demised Premises in order to make the same reasonably tenantable and suitable for the use for which the Demised Premises is leased as defined in Section 5.01. The annual installments of Rent payable under this Lease during the unexpired portion of the Lease Term shall be adjusted equitably. Tenant will have no claim to the condemnation award or proceeds in lieu of condemnation. ARTICLE NINE: ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING Tenant shall not assign this Lease or sublet the Demised Premises or any portion thereof. ARTICLE TEN: DEFAULT AND REMEDIES (7/17/98) Page 5L3-/1 10.01 Default. Each of the following events is an event of default under this Lease: A. Failure of Tenant to pay any installment of the Rent or other sum payable to Landlord under this Lease on the date that it is due and the continuance of that failure for a period of five (5) days after Landlord delivers written notice of the failure to Tenant. This clause shall not be construed to permit or allow a delay in paying Rent beyond the due date and shall not affect Landlord's right to impose a Late Charge as permitted in Section 3.03. B. Failure of Tenant to comply with any term,condition or covenant of this Lease,other than the payment of Rent or other sum of money, and the continuance of that failure for a period of thirty (30)days after Landlord delivers written notice of the failure to Tenant. C. Vacancy or abandonment by Tenant of any substantial portion of the Demised Premises or cessation of the use of the Demised Premises for the purpose leased. 10.02 Remedies. Upon the occurrence of any of the events of default listed in Section 10.01, Landlord shall have the option to pursue any one or more of the following remedies without any prior notice or demand. A. Terminate this Lease, in which event Tenant shall immediately surrender the Demised Premises to Landlord. If Tenant fails to so surrender the Demised Premises,Landlord may, without prejudice to any other remedy which it may have for possession of the Demised Premises or Rent in arrears, enter upon and take possession of the Demised Premises and remove Tenant, by force if necessary, without being liable for prosecution or any claim for damages. Tenant shall pay to Landlord on demand the amount of all loss and damage which Landlord may suffer by reason of the termination,whether through inability to relet the Demised Premises on satisfactory terms or otherwise. B. Enter upon the Demised Premises, by force if necessary, without terminating this Lease and without being liable for prosecution or for any claim for damages, and do whatever Tenant is obligated to do under the terms of this Lease. Tenant agrees to pay Landlord on demand for expenses which Landlord may incur in thus effecting compliance with Tenant's obligations under this Lease,together with interest thereon at the rate of percent per annum from the date expended until paid. Landlord shall not be liable for any damages resulting to Tenant from such action, whether caused by negligence of Landlord or otherwise. C. Declare the costs incurred to modify the Premises to accommodate another tenant, and any other amounts due under this Lease, at once due and payable, and proceed to collect all amounts in the same manner as if all such amounts due or become due (hIlore" (7/17/98) Page 11 during the entire Lease Term were payable in advance by the terms of this lease. D. In addition to the foregoing remedies, Landlord shall have the right to change or modify the locks on the Demised Premises in the event Tenant fails to pay the annual installment of Rent when due. E. No re-entry or taking possession of the Demised Premises by Landlord shall be construed as an election to terminate this Lease, unless a written notice of that intention is given to Tenant. Notwithstanding any such reletting or re-entry or taking possession, Landlord may, at any time thereafter, elect to terminate this Lease for a previous default. The loss or damage that Landlord may suffer by reason of termination of this Lease or the deficiency from any reletting as provided for above shall include the expense of repossession and any repairs or remodeling undertaken by Landlord following possession. If Landlord terminates this Lease at any time for any default, in addition to other remedies Landlord may have,Landlord may recover from Tenant all damages Landlord may incur by reason of the default, including the cost of recovering the Demised Premises and the cost of the Rent then remaining unpaid. 10.03 Landlord's Default. Tenant shall give written notice of any failure by Landlord to perform any of Landlord's obligations under this Lease to Landlord. Landlord shall not be in default (ire under this Lease unless Landlord fails to cure the nonperformance within thirty (30) days after receipt of Tenant's notice. However, if the nonperformance reasonably requires more than thirty(30)days to cure,Landlord shall not be in default if the cure is commenced within the 30-day period and is thereafter diligently pursued to completion. 10.04 Tenant's Remedies. Tenant's remedies for Landlord's default are to (a) sue for damages and/or(b) terminate the Lease. ARTICLE ELEVEN: TERMINATION AND NONAPPROPRIATION 11.01 Termination. The Lease Term will terminate upon the earliest of any of the following events: 1. The expiration of the Term of the Lease; 2. The event of nonappropriation of funds pursuant to Section 11.02 hereof; or 3. A default by Lessee and Lessor's election to terminate the Lease under Section 10.04 hereof. 11.02 Nonappropriation. In the event the Tenant does not appropriate sufficient funds for the payment of rent required to be paid for any annual installment, and if Tenant has no funds (7/17/98) Page 12 legally available for rent from other sources,the Tenant may terminate this Lease at the end of the then current fiscal year. Tenant agrees to deliver notice to Landlord of such termination of the Lease at least ninety(90)days prior to the end of any fiscal year of Tenant. 11.03 Tenant's Intent. Tenant intends, subject to the provisions of Section B hereof, to continue • the Lease throughout its Term,provided that lawful appropriations are made. Tenant intends to take all steps lawfully within its power to obtain and maintain funds from which the rent payments may be made, including making provisions for such rent payments to the extent necessary in each fiscal year budget submitted and to approve such portion of the budget. 11.04 Reduction of Space. In the event that Tenant's restructures a program or is mandated by federal or state law to modify a program which results in a reduced need of space, Tenant may,upon six months notice to Landlord,modify this Lease to reduce the amount of square footage of the Demised Premises. ARTICLE TWELVE: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 12.01 Tenant's Compliance with Laws. Tenant,at Tenant's expense,shall comply with all laws, rules, orders, ordinances,directions,regulations and requirements of Federal, State, county and municipal authorities pertaining to Tenant's use of the Property and with the recorded covenants, conditions and restrictions,regardless of when they become effective, including, without limitation, all applicable Federal, State and local laws, regulations or ordinances pertaining to air and water quality,Hazardous Materials(as defined in Section 12.05), waste disposal, air emissions and other environmental matters, all zoning and other land use matters, and with any direction of any public officer or officers, pursuant to law, which impose any duty upon Landlord or Tenant with respect to the use or occupancy of the Property. 12.02 Hazardous Materials. Tenant shall not cause or permit any Hazardous Materials to be brought upon, kept or used in or about the Property by Tenant, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees without the prior written consent of Landlord. If the presence of any Hazardous Materials on the Property(or any other property) caused or permitted by Tenant results in any contamination of the Property, Tenant shall promptly take all actions at Tenant's sole expense as are necessary to return the Property to the condition existing prior to the introduction of any such Hazardous Materials, provided that Landlord's approval of such actions is first obtained. 12.03 Definition. For purposes of this Lease, the term"Hazardous Materials"means any one or more pollutant,toxic substance,hazardous waste, hazardous material, hazardous substance, solvent or oil as defined in or pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended,the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended, the Federal Clean Water Act, as amended, or any other Federal, State or local environmental law, regulation, ordinance, or rule, whether existing as of the date of this (7/17/98) Page 13 (161., Lease or subsequently enacted. 12.05 Survival. The provisions contained in this Article 12 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. ARTICLE THIRTEEN: MISCELLANEOUS 13.01 Force Majeure. If performance by Landlord of any term, condition or covenant in this Lease is delayed or prevented by any Act of God, strike, lockout, shortage of material or labor, restriction by any governmental authority, civil riot, flood, or any other cause not within the control of Landlord,the period for performance of the term,condition or covenant shall be extended for a period equal to the period Landlord is so delayed or prevented. 13.02 Interpretation. The captions of the Articles or Sections of this Lease are to assist the parties in reading this Lease and are not a part of the terms or provisions of this Lease. Tenant shall be responsible for the conduct,acts and omissions of Tenant's agents,employees,customers, contractors, invitees,agents, successors or others using the Demised Premises with Tenant's expressed or implied permission. Whenever required by the context of this Lease, the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular, and the masculine, feminine and neuter genders shall each include the other. (01., 13.03 Waivers. All waivers to provisions of this Lease must be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Landlord's delay or failure to enforce any provisions of this Lease or its acceptance of late installments of Rent shall not be a waiver and shall not prevent Landlord from enforcing that provision or any other provision of this Lease in the future. Pursuit of any of the foregoing remedies shall not preclude pursuit of any other remedies provided by law,nor shall pursuit of any remedy provided in this Lease constitute a forfeiture or waiver of any annual installment of Rent due to Landlord under this Lease or of any damages accruing to Landlord by reason of the violation of any of the terms,provisions and covenants contained in this Lease. 13.04 Severability. A determination by a court of competent jurisdiction that any provision of this Lease is invalid or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the remainder of that provision of this Lease, which shall remain in full force and effect. 13.05 Amendments or Modifications. This Lease is the only agreement between the parties pertaining to the lease of the Demised Premises and no other agreements are effective unless made a part of this Lease. All amendments to this Lease must be in writing and signed by all parties. Any other attempted amendments shall be void. If the parties agree,Tenant may expand the Demised Premises by written amendment to this Lease. 13.06 Notices. All notices and other communications required or permitted under this Lease must (7/17/98) Page 14 be in writing and shall be deemed delivered,whether actually received or not, on the earlier of: (i)actual receipt if delivered in person or by messenger with evidence of delivery; or(ii) upon deposit in the United States Mail as required below. Notices delivered by mail must be deposited in the U.S. Postal Services, first class postage prepaid, and properly addressed to the intended recipient as set forth in Article One. After possession of the Demised Premises by Tenant,Tenant's address for notice purposes will be the address of the Demised Premises unless Tenant notifies Landlord in writing of a different address to be used for that purpose. Any party may change its address for notice by delivering written notice of its new address to all other parties in the manner set forth above. 13.07 Attorneys' Fees. If on account of any breach or default by any party to this Lease in its obligations to any other party to this Lease, it becomes necessary for a party to employ an attorney to enforce or defend any of its rights or remedies under this Lease, the non- prevailing party agrees to pay the prevailing party its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs, if any,whether or not suit is instituted in connection with the enforcement or defense. 13.08 Venue. All obligations under this Lease shall be performable and payable in Tarrant County. The laws of the State of Texas shall govern this Lease. 13.09 Survival. All obligations of any party to this Lease which are not fulfilled at the expiration or the termination of this Lease shall survive such expiration or termination as continuing (lbw, obligations of the party. ARTICLE FOURTEEN: JOINT USE AREA 14.01 Use. Use of the Joint Use Area shall be determined as follows: Tenant shall be entitled to use the Council/Board Chambers for all regularly scheduled meetings of its Board of Trustees. Tenant may use rooms in the Joint Use Area at other times on a first come, first served basis. ARTICLE FIFTEEN: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 15.01 Design. Landlord shall use diligent efforts to consider Tenant's space requirements and placement preferences in the design of the Property. Tenant shall have the right to review the plans and specifications for the Joint Use Area and Common Areas. Tenant shall have the right to review the design plans and specifications for the construction of the Demised Premises. 15.02 Right to Review. Tenant shall have the right to review the plans and specifications and construction of the Common Area space. (7/17/98) Page 15 (have LANDLORD THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Mayor ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY TENANT CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT By: Title: President (sr Date: (kw (7/17/98) Page 16 Je3-17 Exhibit "A" � Method of Calculation of Capital Costs (., (7/I'I9 8 ) Page 17 Exhibit "B" Method of Calculation of Operating �- Expenses (1/1]98) Page 18 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Charlie J. Thomas, Public Works Deputy Director SUBJECT: Authorize Mayor to Enter into a Commercial Developer Agreement for Creekside Office Joint Venture, Plat Showing Lot 9, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition, Being on the South Side of E. Southlake Blvd.,Approximately 600' East of the Intersection of Byron Nelson Parkway and E. Southlake Blvd. Background The Commercial Developer Agreement for Creekside Office Joint Venture, Plat Showing Lot 9, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition is attached with the following addition(s): • PARK FEES In accordance with Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-F, Section 7.0, the Developer will be required to pay a Park Fee of$800 per acre for 1.963 acre for the total Park Dedication Fees of$1,570 in lieu of dedicating park land. Please see the attached memorandum from Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent, dated July 15, 1998. Recommendation It is recommended to authorize the Mayor to enter into a Commercial Developer Agreement for Creekside Office Joint Venture, Plat Showing Lot 9, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition, being on the south side of E. Southlake Blvd., approximately 600' east of the intersection of Byron Nelson Parkway and E. Southlake Blvd. Please place this item on the Regular City Council Agenda for July 21, 1998 for City Council review and consideration. 6.7"44-- CT/ls Attachments: Agreement Ben Henry Memorandum Le M:\WD-FILES\PROJECTS\98-5011\da-meml.doc 5C-1 f igy,� ss ' �'i b � a,� P. tif 48 ,� �; �29,e 3 &" w� 4a "`RE a er a s 3 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer", of the 1 w` . ' o a i .a .-s t' hereinafter referred to "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, which is described on the attached Exhibit "Al" for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the , i en '., 1, ,Aa lt)) (a commercial development) and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the public facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the subdivision if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds should be approved by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. C. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash m,,..`, 4 R 14 e �`ir... t t s# a'y v il ,. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-2 escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final �... City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove, which are intended to be public facilities, shall be vested in the City of Southlake, and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire agreement shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent(2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing(95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 ,�► 5C-3 • f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. F. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. I. The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City of Southlake. " ,...F=. ci "°a'4 1 r' ww rtti b 3:aR '', R N. °, 1f \01..- COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-4 • J. The Developer agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the 4! t kVx e, i a .' j;..+ -1)c: to the City of Southlake. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. The City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS: The street construction in the ? "3 z (. .51 ` '" • ? ' �¢%' z;"a'si 'a Rz � at.a , commercial development of the City of Southlake :KS44 '4Wi071°;(6)i 1' ' COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-5 Addition will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and two year operation of street lights; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended based upon the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as prepared by the Developer's engineer by an engineering study or direction of the Director of Public Works. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the civato,,N � a� �.��. '(- 53kaaSi La,f 4, a1t . r4, 2 1,1(4)! to the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, engineering, permits and Impact Fees. In the event that certain sewer lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-6 • will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the subdivision at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. F. AMENITIES: It understood by and between the Cit and Developer that the -6 k `'e $d=?'$t •:1T,i .,-`,4,151.!i�... may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. ff..:. < 10 %,1W €fit i \ft.— COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-7 • H. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer. 3. All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. 5. A Pre-Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors, major Sub- Contractors, Utilities and appropriate Government Agencies. IH. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS),ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE,OCCUPANCY,USE,EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES, OR TRESPASSERS. i jil COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-8 • DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND �... EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings bought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. '*"..- COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-9 • In addition, the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES: A. PARK FEES: The Developer agrees to pay the Park Fee $800 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-F, Section 7.0. There are ap i roximately acres in } .„�.t.i ?, o t98d sr 0,33t a1t.3: 33� i'' $ '_a:A lr tt t'u;u which would bring the total cost of Park Fee to E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-A. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Address: ra act Q ., A .larg3�, � �_ COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-10 STATE OF ��..� COUNTY OF On , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared ,personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person,or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public My commission expires: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: a 3 - s a k 9 4 `•— COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-11 • REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit (L of C) must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by a FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited fmancial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. M:\WD-FILES\PROJECTS\98-5018\dev-agmt.doc CIiP 9 t �s '°�pa �w� A �... COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 07/21/98 5C-12 07/07/1998 02:31 8174882420 MONTICELLO ESTATES PAGE 02 EX "Al" Routh_ lak• _ _ Bvul•var.d l F. H. Higqheay 17o9 1 Asphel'1 Reed ,v2.1....M1 5« N 8T49'58'E 206.48*/ s" P.0.1. * ".;`"""."r_—j 1\s % tiot 9 . Ear 0 \ PLACELot 2-9 DlG VolVol18a}ff4.P9.304 A\ n \ ji o.n.r.R' i Faii7 Lined Pa • t Volme 10432 Pogo 161 \\ H V7 MPa Food 1 71n Silt i. :r ;. h �- i I '%• .. •»t / { "Ithe right to.r e * ;► any lot contained . f. o evotions shown are $ . lotion avalable at the Lot 2-C il a sub ject to change. DLO PLACE Vol 3664741.Pg. 30 shown. mcry also be I :terio. g this addition by metes Law and City Ordinonce olding of utIittes and Wl zI . NE BEARING DISTANCE j L.._ 1 N 89'57'I7'11 39.1 2' — - - (ZSees Fwiops.,L I lk Vt Fe.PA F.+d 0w,.r Two'ran Laid ca'porat.:o Vol-~10531 Pogo 235 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT _ 07/21/98 • 5C-13 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 15, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent SUBJECT: Park Dedication for Creekside Office Building At its July 13, 1998 meeting, the Park Board considered the park dedication requirements for Creekside Office Building. This being a commercial development of less than five (5) acres, the item was placed on the Consent Agenda as per Park Board's guidelines to staff. The developer requested to pay fees of $800 per acre in lieu of park land dedication. The total assessment amounts to $1,570 for the 1.963 acre development. The Park Board voted 6-0 to recommend park dedication fees to be paid in the total amount of $1,570 for Creekside Office Building, in lieu of park land dedication. Please contact me if you have any questions. BH L 5C-14 • • .i - CREEKSIDE OFFICE JOINT VENTURE 930 Parkview Lane Southlake, Texas 76092 July 01, 1998 Park Board City of Southlake Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Park Board Members : We are applying for a Developer's Agreement with the City of Southlake and under- stand that we must either donate land or pay a fee of$800.00 per acre for Park fees. The parcel of land that we will develop for two small offices is only 1.963 acres so we will offer to pay the required fees as stated above. We would appreciate you expediting your approval so that this can proceed to City Council as soon as possible. If you have any questions,you can contact us at 329-4599. Thank you for consideration. Sincerely, Terry L. Wilkinson General Partner 5C-15 • 4,..............//1N.\ \ 1:1 ,.kh(•rr, �� , \► _._\ SO'WILD**,LINEr. �'n \ ` ry L `\\ �, R Ir.kt••r S 1 j' Hock eft), Y u GONGJ'IALK z in 1 Y' - sbild • ,ay1i1 \ � �� '� \ \yc?`:.•: III \ KC., : • , • -,N A N \\s \\ ---•' [—i—Z- 1 • e �'\ s Di �' F .s.\\\\k \\:•,,W\\ ::' •NO- :��.,: EN ill • j`\`\ �• i` GONG*V ALK if l .J N^ a 1 ill g Z t `�`, it • cl OO • II 11 (1 W O•• • • '` Z, 06rAGCS��'-O EAG� i' �r 1 Y. O La— ---- '_._ 11 V. \ \ pi 111 1/1 < us %%I # \...'s ". \ Ei ili • In ,fl�.''•,;, ;✓ . (FIRE LANE) • r U 0� 1 0 7" Hockberry \ , — n rixsAG�.,'-vtAOM D z p . el oo�.z -- N- 0 -1 o- / GONGl W.K J ! ul aJ F- 11 3' /• ilo khAt r \\ `gin ,, _ it li.,'il•••• 1. \\`* . ' ' .. '&':`,; ,Wi' I., ',.'• .s. 1 cZ\-..;•:\. \ , "••••:.,,',....:;,;:k•:::,... .;;I::::*:;,..... v to • z 4-•Ark.;.:••••.....,.... 1 \` \ \\\ \ \�`\` • .3 kill_ -I n 1 0 . tr a i. 1. o. V ".6 CO •` ` =L_ E� . A , L , NI ONE LOADG SPACCw u -.a=yO..o -- yow O \ 111 Cf) ? 5C-16 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for the installation of a 24-inch sanitary sewer line along Kirkwood Boulevard from Dove Street to Kirkwood Hollow Background This project is part of the proposed force main to be built along Dove St. and to connect to the existing line in the Kirkwood Hollow Addition that extends to the TRA lift station on N. White Chapel. The proposed force main will empty into this 24-inch gravity line, which is proposed to extend along a portion of Dove St. and Kirkwood Blvd. Staff suggests building this line prior to the construction of Kirkwood Blvd., which will avoid any conflict that could exist once the pavement is in place. Kirkwood Blvd. is being constructed as part of the Kirkwood Hollow Addition currently under construction. Therefore, the need exists to construct this portion of the sewer system at this time. The force main portion of the system along Dove St. is awaiting acquisition of addition easements. This proposed line would be funded from the CIP budget as a part of the Dove St. force main project. The CIP budget provides a total of$1,119,800 for the entire Dove St. force main project with the Kirkwood gravity line portion estimated to cost$197,591. Recommendation Staff recommends Council authorize advertisement of bids for the installation of a 24- inch sanitary sewer line along Kirkwood Blvd. from Dove St. to Kirkwood Hollow. Please place this item on the July 21, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre Attachment: Map Exhibit L 5D-1 N Proposed rkwood (...... • ani a ewer,.._.„ „.______, ine ,__------- , , 1 , i , .___ ,_L r___, ,_, . _ _,_, , ... ___, , i \_ 1 y TRA Lift Station ,, , ,/ ' 1— �\ i /"111\ ,-, 4: ___ 1 i ,___.- 1 � A / �I ��0/ �� : (re __—• - o- H___ L \ 1 1 , , r 1 j D• r DoVe St: r- \ \ \`vA I , 1 ♦ I :. Proposed Dove Force Main `♦ Existing Gravity Line Z N Proposed Gravity Line SiLt......411N le L + , , , City of Southiake SD-2 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with the City of Fort Worth for Purchases In the past, the City has purchased fuel through an interlocal agreement with Tarrant County. Two grades of unleaded along with diesel fuel are used in City vehicles and equipment. The fuel is stored at the City's Public Works Facility in the recently installed above-ground tanks. Ernest Bramlett, Southlake Water Utilities Project Coordinator, has learned that Tarrant County's fuel contract expired in May, and they have chosen not to re-bid fuel, but to utilize the City of Fort Worth's contract prices through a cooperative purchasing agreement. The City of Fort Worth has offered a similar arrangement to the City of Southlake. An interlocal agreement is presented for Council consideration, which allows Southlake to purchase goods and services through vendors that have been awarded bids by the City of Fort Worth. The agreement is for a one year term, with automatic one year term renewals. Sixty days written notice prior to expiration of the one year term is required to terminate. The immediate need for this agreement is to purchase fuel, however other goods and services may be purchased through the contract. The current fuel providers under the contract are Direct Fuels L. P. and Lucky Lady Oil Company. The prices are based on Dallas Metro/TX OPIS Petrosat net prices, plus or minus an amount per gallon, based on the transport load size. By using the City of Fort Worth contract, Southlake can benefit from the volume purchase pricing, which is likely a much better rate than could be obtained based on Southlake volumes alone. It also saves us the time and expense to advertise for bids, since Fort Worth's bid satisfies the-state law requirements on bidding. Please place the Interlocal Governmental Contract for Purchasing between the Cities of Southlake and Fort Worth on the July 21 agenda for consideration. The City of Fort Worth will be forwarded the contract for their approval and execution. LAH City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM July 1, 1998 TO: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance FROM: Ernest Bramlett, Water Utilities Project Coordinator SUBJECT: Interlocal Governmental Contract to Purchase Fuel on Fort Worth's Contract Lou Ann since the movement of the fuel facility to the Public Works Center, fuel has been purchased from the County on their yearly contract. This contract was terminated in May, and the County did not elect to re-bid fuel for this budget year. The County satisfies their fuel needs by piggy-backing on the City of Fort Worth's contract. I have contacted the City of Fort Worth purchasing department and they have sent me the attached copies of the bid prices for fuels and a blank Interlocal Purchasing Agreement. If it is agreeable to you would you take the steps that would allow the City to purchase from these L., contracts. If you have any questions, please contact me and I will try to find the answers for you. EB/je L SE . MAY-08-38 FRI 14: 18 CITY OF FT, WORTH P'JRCH FAX NO. 8178718440 P. 04i06 CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NUMBER Lse INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACT FOR PURCHASING CITY OF FORT WORTH AND This contract is made and entered Into this -day of , 1998 by and between the , Texas, a governmental agency, (hereinafter referred to as ), acting by and through its duly authorized , and the City of Fort Worth, (hereinafter referred to as Fort Worth) acting by and through Charles Boswell, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager. WHEREAS, and Fort Worth (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "parities" or either"party") are political subdivisions of the State of Texas authorized to contract with each other relative to governmental functions and services by the Interlocal Cooperating Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791;and WHEREAS, the parties believe that cooperating in the purchasing of various goods, materials, equipment and supplies which both parties use In carrying out their governmental functions and services will enable the parties to obtain these goods, materials, equipment and supplies in better terms and/or prices than by making such purchases individually, and both desire to increase efficiency and effectiveness of such purchasing by acting joint In competitively procuring selected goods, materials,equipment and supplies. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: w AGREEMENT This Contract shall be for a term of one (1) year beginning on , 1998, and ending on , 1999. This Contract shall automatically renew for ono (1)year terms thereafter unless one party gives written notice to the other party of its desire not to renew. The written notice required shall be at least sixty(60)days prior to the expiration of an existing one year term. 2. SCOPE AND IMPLEMENTATION It is the intent of the parties that the Joint or cooperative purchasing through each others contracts will be as broad as is allowed by applicable state statutes. Unless otherwise prevented by law, it Is the intent of the parties that the two may take part in joint purchase for any goods and services they may need to carry out their governmental functions, and that either one will use reasonable efforts to allow the other to make purchases under its contracts. In each instance, however,there shall be a"purchasing agreement"or "purchase order"issued by the entity desiring to make the purchase. and agreed to or countersigned by the entity having the contract with the supplier of goods or services, or which is the lead entity in that contract. which purchasing agreement or purchase order shall specify the supply contract in question and set out any and all terms and conditions appropriate to such joint purchase. The purchasing agreement or purchase `order shall be acknowledged by the supplier and shall be considered as being issued under this agreement and shall be subject to ail of the tams and conditions of this agreement without the necessity of those being set out or specifically referred to In such purchasing agreement or purchase order. Lisoi PAGE#1 Sg -.3 .MAY-08-93 FRI 14:19 CITY OF FT. WOF.Th PURCH FAX NO. 8178718440 P. 05/06 3. COMPENSATION The parties agree to share the cost of the respective joint solicitations in a fair and equitable manner, to be agreed upon in connection with each such solicitation. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The parties hereby agree to abide by and obey ail applicable local, state and.federal laws and requirements. which apply to their respective procurement policies. It Is specifically understood and agreed that whichever party is handling the preparation and processing of the Joint invitations for bid shall comply with all legal requirements for competitive bidding which are applicable to both parties. 5. NOTICES Any notices or other communication required or allowed to be given by one party to the other pursuant to this Contract shall be hand delivered or mailed by United States Postal Service, proper postage affixed to the addresses shown below: To City of Fort Worth: Purchasing Manager City of Fort Worth 1000 Throclanorton Fort Worth,Texas 76102 • To 6. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE This contract shall be governed by and Interpreted on accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. This contract is entered into and is to be performed, wholly or in part, in the State of Texas and In Tarrant County, Texas. In any action brought under the contract. venue shall be exclusively In Tarrant County, Texas. In the event that any portion of this contract shall be found to be contrary to law,lt is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. 7. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS By execution of this contract,each party represents to the other that a. In performing its duties and obligations hereunder, it will be carrying out one or more governmental .' functions or services which it is authorized to perform; b. The undersigned officer or agent of the party has Peen properly authorized by that part's governing body to execute this contract and that any necessary resolutions extending such authority have been duly passed and are now in effect; PAGE#2 SE - � . INAY-03-93 FRI 14:20 CITY OF FT. WORTH PURCH FAX NO 8178718440 P,06/06 c. All payments required or permitted to be made by a party will be made from current revenues available to the paying party. and Lof d. All payments provided at be hereunder by one party to the other shall be such amounts as to fairly compensate the other party for the services or functions performed hereunder. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT This contract represents the full, final and complete agreement of the parties related to its subject matter and may not be added to, contradicted or otherwise modified by evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreement or subsequent oral agreements or statements of either of the parties, nor by any writing not signed by both parties after the date of this contract No representations, inducement, promises, or agreements, oral or otherwise, not embodied or incorporated herein shall be of any force or effect. In case If any apparent ambiguity or conflict among any of the terms or provisions of this contract, they shall be construed as nearly as possible as to effectuate each and all of such terms or provisions keeping in mind that the overriding purpose of this contract is the public purpose of increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the respective purchases of goods,materials, equipment and supplies by the parties IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Parties hereto have executed this contract on this date, the day of J 1998. City of Fort Worth By: By: NAME Bob Terrell TITLE City Manager ATTEST: ATTEST: By: By: NAME NAME TITLE City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY LEGALITY BY: By: NAME • TITLE Ast City Attorney PAGE#3 S -5 •• .. ..� �. ... .... v . . v. . ..v.:... . ..:v.. cu. nv. Alrvf &IJV J i. UJ/vv y � • City of Fort Worth, Texas • )'tjaijor and Council Communication DATE 1/e/98 Rer'etts CE NUMB "P-8498 NAME 070439 PAOE 661.11 1 of 3 $ aJecT PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR GASOLINE, MIDGRADE, IEMIUM & REGULAR WITH DIRECT FUELS L. P. FOR THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, AND AN INTERLOCAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize: 1. A purchase agreement for gasoline, midgrad9, premium & regular for the City of Fort Worth with Direct Fuels L. P. based on the low bid of the following cost plus and fess discount off the Dallas Metro/TX OPIS Petrosat net prices, payment terms are net 30 days, f.o.b. shipping point, freight included in cost of fuel; and • A. Mldgrade gasoline/transport load, 7,500 or more gallons/delivered at minus$.0050 B, Midgrade gasoline/short transport load, 4,000 to 7,499 gallons/delivered at plus$.0015 C. Midgrade gasoline/tank wagon load, 3,999 gallons or less/delivered at plus$.0200 D. Midgrade gasoline/tank wagon load 4,000 gallons or less/picked up.at plus$.0100. E. Premium gasoline/transport load, 7,600 or more gallons/delivered at minus$.0050 F. Premium gasoline/short transport load.4,000 to 7,499 gallons/delivered.at plus$.0015 G. Premium gasoline/tank wagon load/3,999 gallons or less/delivered at plus$.0200 • H. Premium gasoline/tank wagon load.4,000 gallons or less/picked up at plus$.0100 L Regular gasoline/transport load. 7.500 or more gallons/delivered at minus$.0050 J. Regular gasoline/short transport load,4,000 to 7,499 gallons/delivered at plus$.0015 K Regular gasoline/tank wagon load, 3,999 gallons or less/delivered at plus$.0200 L. Regular gasoline/tank wagon load,4,000 gallons or less/picked up at plus$.0100 2. The City Manager to enter Into Interlocal purchase agreements with other:govemmentai entities as requested based on the same prices,terms and conditions of the original'agreement; and • 3. This agreement to begin January 9,.1998, and end January 8, 1999, with two options to renew for one-year each. • unt uo �� rAL .ti Ur r.. WUfr:a r'Jt{'vi! ;HA NU, d11i3f18440 P. 02/08 • • j t City of Fort Worth, Texas (ikw , 41jagor and Council Communication DATE Rare tenet NuMacre Leo NAnse PAOC 11/11/97 **P-8451 970265R ' 1 of 3 sue.,ecr PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR DIESEL FUEL 41, 2 AND 70/30 BLEND WITH LUCKY LADY OIL COMPANY FOR THE CITY OF FORTWORTH, INTERLOCAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: • it is recommended that the City Council authorize: • • 1. A purchase agreement for diesel fuel #1, 2, and 70/30 blend with Lucky Lady Oil Company based on the low bid of the following cost plus and less discount off the Dallas Metro/TX OPTS Petrosat Net Prices. Payment terms are net 15 days,f.o.b.shipping point,freight included in cost of fuel;and A. #1 Diesel fuel/transport load, 7,500 or more gallons/delivered at plus $.0185 cents B. #1.Diesel fuel/short transport load,4,000 to 7,499 gallons/delivered at plus $.0285 cents . C. #1 Diesel fueltank wagon load,3,999 gallons or less/delivered at plus $.0485 cents D. #1 Diesel fuel/tank wagon load 4,000 gallons or less/picked up at plus $.0100 cents E. #2 Diesel fuel/transport load, 7,500 or more gallons/delivered at plus F. #2 iesel fuel/short transport load,4.000 to 7,499 gallons/delivered $.0065 cents at plus ' $.0165 cents G. #2 Diesel fuel/tank wagon load, 3,999 gallons or less/delivered et plus $.0465 cents H. #2 Diesel fuel/tank wagon load, 4.000 gallons or less/picked up at plus $.0065 cents I: 70/30 blend/transport load, 7,500 or more gallons/delivered at less $.0400 cents J. 70/30 blend/short transport load, 4,000 to 7,499 gallons/delivered • at less $.0300 cents K. 70/30 blend/tank wagon load, 3,999 gallons or less/delivered at less 8.0125 cents L 70/30 blend/tank wagon load,4,000 gallons or less/picked up 'at less - $.0400 cents 2. The City Manager to enter Into interfaced purchase agreements with any other governmental entities. as requested, based on the same prices, terms and conditions of the original agreement and 3. This agreement to begin November 11, 1997, and end November 10, 1998, with two options to renew for one-year each. L .S" -7 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 16, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Approve list of training providers as required by the Public Funds Investment Act Chapter 2256 of the Government Code outlines the Public Funds Investment Act. The law details the authorized investments for governmental entities, establishes a standard of care in the investment of public funds, and addresses reporting and required training. Section 2256.008 (a) states that the treasurer, chief financial officer, or investment officer of a local government shall attend an investment training session not less than once in a two-year period. The training should be not less than 10 hours of instruction relating to investment responsibilities from an independent source approved by the governing body of the local government. Recommended organizations providing this training are: 1. University of North Texas Center for Public Management 2. The Government Treasurers Organization of Texas 3. Texas Municipal League, and 4. Government Finance Officers Association of Texas I recently completed 10 hours of investment training with the University of North Texas Center for Public Management. The Chief Accountant has completed 5 hours, and will very shortly complete the remaining 5 hours with the same program. The remaining providers in the above list also have programs that may be utilized in the future. They are recommended for approval as alternative sources, since this investment training is required every 2 years. The provision for governing body approval is a requirement that was effective September 1, 1997. I am recommending the four providers listed above be approved by the Council as independent sources of investment training as required under Section 2256.008 of the Government Code. LAH L .5F L °p flt n >, :o o C Vo G eocu u u pu u OCt ° a 0� N< - u U LC .0 n E E E u. c., a „ nV N ,Cco C oe u 11, n . oC. � 0. ) o - To — Oo U C C •^ E r > cor C ,_ " .v u C Cyan iH co(11b10 ysIA 3< ° a. CS L 0.= 0":- `1V; o y ' C r :7 s • E � •7,; c • Cu :aNU C ^ N U- iHII OEej - • C ,P, • CO C ' •3 Inst qL. n , r0 O CV L. C .� Egr C -. -1 Uccl 0. r ..C i0 .- a` n . p2, y e 'O7 c .. D. N u O'yeaC p C E VI LU. a '� -y U7-O O .p '0 eo -- : �au`p; iS p.'�;� -emu,s i0 Q$ ° a� a: n =v co p, C U c C O a. L o y L• ,T, a' o A e. U �• °� .n L Y 4^ Y m •C U u C a� (d y a 0 GLj d C 1 C yr n E al 7 L ..: p i v N 0 2 a i u E .: 4 aci i 7 p ,t u v A u .u .° r� 00ELsL• `u 3 " E ,. i+ �" 9 ° '; O �° 2 W00•°s �''" Zs; 7e S c - TA ..c ,,, > u C .G a 2o-c = . 2tiuO 4 c -o u u ..' y p u U n 7 �.. O 0:. L. r u - Y w -�C� U n o L n =2- C u so. O v Z. n 7 COI O I. CO a W, cn O a, O y c ep x n _C r e pp n �y� .. F. E ry C g �s > 4` w • y r;co o a :° a' io cus u o c eo •—u u c co c c a c E c o w a w L : ° X E n CO •:, °a co 'E c.� •u a c C c ., 'c c -C O u Q ,: 0-0 C r u Y ; W :. .O•C a u ,.. u U-O E e e n C u^' E C n C y Y L e a 4-s u 7 y N n O u n c O.1= al a� c. ,=I. > .L. aa"i 10 s' v n C 'L V T. w U ,. w m " C n > - fn •• v 0 u •- C L _ I. a R al E'r u c u c ea , n - > u .0 . 0 0 o P$ . E L .r C t A a•ao o u ° vi a• c C -e u C iri u u O ' C °. 'S' _— 5 'O E U O u >, '�cl= e; is 14 u U � p y .� E >. u Y �°. c L.0-.ry >.C Y ,a N C u 7 al n i 1) U a- U - L �' E eU •.+ 7 n 0 L. 'fl •w > n r i C 0 Y 0 7 r•O a. Y n W C n n n C n t 'C a -O > •C -O b0 00 L :: - - y O > '> n a.. • O to o c s-- >, eJ > a: a = .D 00 C C C .., u n o, a a `u _Y u e m e° V vnnO, u ° LahYC•- w... L o C un ..C. > O 7 •4u 3 H a ,Yn u O .O io :a C c`0 u p E u a � eo au, = L, �'" � ,. c� " � " m a� « o `0 C..0 0 0 � o o c • rZ V •S;7 n n •0 aJ a) U U y ,Y, Y O w •' r� C CO ... .. QJ u u .a n •.. `: C UL ,c• u, au. a aci C O y Q v; o .E u 3•ppu E `°- o G. =° ` ^o E tea, c °uao) W -. o u 0 E •° �- C u C1 .O O [�, .L. eo L, .0 ,N Qr ry - • u.. cl rue u O -a u C O O O > ...N in ("' u .. U eU.! N O Q.� E U E.• H L .9 N - O _ L Y•� C `O C In W _E ,^ v en.0 Lam. ` PL v O ry L. w C^ u E -c O .r A Z 1.4 N G v G�y'.. v CJ Y O H L7. y •_ V /L� 6-14F Y }. A L 7 u v CJ UM C.s - 0 _- e�. a.-_. .,., u:_"C -..,_C-: --. i. 3 •a 3 :C•._Lam.... ✓:..71Z .�i..:�i:f.....r.1. N 17 N L ...1 0 •••• •t • ••• le. oL .es: M CP Ls .•• •••• • • F C m o C L U Al u C • ,;F W _es,� N co n [ u o E : c [ e x L �^ Q v 0 ft—.0-- -0 rr� L `°' ry d .0 C 'u0 tel u .O •V u a a;, n u p " °Fy+w o o c °e W. .O y .l� > > C n C ,rEi, tu, ea � � ` a`yuuyC < e u N t .o E •-o O O C eo Q, u >, W n - e u FL,7L. u `o y L U ',�' eq 00 L O' C ._Q .. -7 ... .0 u y s .. C u`o o`o • c .o u �; e:N C ,� >, C u E 0 C " .0 < v u ii y E7 Cm V 0 Y,o V + .=io a� C io CO .4 Cp U C >�-c d 0 rii Len 0 E E3 0 `a ea 0 w Oo •• C N C �; 0 00 d o O C ...co L° ra u M .9 C,O, ElC L .r .� � .� O O,N ; ., y y C a a� -tr, - Y.. n<.: o ar c~a U eCo y >,-p u -- a ,�r,° t...2.o e y` E ''y CO .7 .y -' O M1 ?V u y p O o .0 n E .. •^ ... ^ Y E y E L.0 E U n -• ° C a Z 0 N C n •y al u vi O -O '.0 ° Y . E.c g E c v v u a C,.,< u E x OD L. u C E.u n °. > mu u v r� u eq o-,U 00 eo 6J X C u n C �"' CI .0 00 «ac to - Z °�u o°Os W L p•.° V O°, p a' co) ro `, 7 <> �> u O oa a .. ro a u y L �'" � 3 u ,. CE°w.s LUL .� C C u u G cif u ai U 7 u •e _ u o •' > .-. .�. L. •,C .-C"" xa. n n• a L ...•.E W <.:. C•y O 7 1.,. <v rL u O pe u) O •C •2 ref 60 ° u .6 7 rn H e 7 O=W_. O .a V e ,C 0 "' •. •to W,n v O r0 00 ••• 3 U E u > ,.. 7 C n• O r; C Q C-c C w L w y u er C E u a'"' E y o n >, �°r w a w wn a �N ua -O .d C C C O C w R u u -•' °.` �;p u o A ,, E o U T. O R L 0 L]. •_ 0 ... U >, n C 0 .0 3 u .. O a O< E L Y- C - L > .0 a I. e3 L C t CUD u u - 0 A u o,,0. K " e,. E v ri F O n u 7 COI �+ H T. to ,.. bit,< t' N - a u n a O . n -1 Z u c, C � aai -C n u L CO boC 01 O ..y 21 7 a to° r. e�e3Ev � .0 _ y- 4J 01 .V n .. a) E C O C. e = 7 0 u C Z•fl u ,o > t > �* ^tea E L .0 .a. •u •C :: o O, u E N�'i,'„= mo C u t` Nee.° .. n w co u •-• n ,' 'C G n v, v C: E > y y-0 -- "-0 • C vi s. 0 d p -C G L p u 0 u v ^ a ws 4W u EccEel c u -c a a u u G u u C C ^0� 'C SCco) C o u x tn. �� a ,a �yX �c " m N E ` L. ''.., u u a.a�• 1.4 .G r? 7 T" y 7 L. u O •u O ^� ^c w '. p u o w W.. •`• _C a C1 0 .N. ..d...7.d E f4 n ^ a n E -V �, e9 T 7 G Y c N 7 O t0.- %O U < L L " N E .9, X n OD t, u o.CA 01 .+ a) '0 U U,- L. u Y 7 4.7 C V •'L 0 E Q U •Orr. C G a -ram ,7 ..c L• > >, L. o L Q U ,-. -0 •7 ,. O Y•- Y C 7 LI O •+ L i O0. .7 a n e 0 3 ° E; qi eo n C .0 u L u C > 'fl L e ry E q u 7 L u m w Y e L. L. N v C '9 a .n: N W L C '2 I-I C E 1 n ,Lu,• < C C a• "' ° L > >c E ,=c-°�' " E • N E u o uuu N a 4.1 G. 7 7 u� p. v L — u ° un u „ y ` j 3 E7 = `OeEr eor, Q «< �- n G ° � ." q� o E,� end --`itAc° o � �0LIo� a. ern O L a' .. u eo CO n 00.0 Q u ; Y L 3 C� 731 � a C7 0 E-6 5F City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT July 17, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-063 PROJECT: Plat Vacation - Lot 1. T. Beedy No. 72 Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner,481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Vacation of property legally described as Lot 1, T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3584, Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas,and being approximately 9.79 acres. LOCATION: East side of North Peytonville Avenue approximately 220' north of the intersection of Plantation Drive and North Peytonville Avenue. OWNER: Lee Fahrenbrook APPLICANT: Kingdom Park Developments, L.L.C. CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: None required P&Z ACTION: July 9, 1998; Approved (6-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is the application for the Plat Vacation of Lot 1, T. Beedy No. 72 Addition. Please note that this plat vacation must be approved and filed of record in Tarrant County prior to filing of the Final Plat for Case ZA98-070, submitted as Pinecastle Pointe Addition. L:\CONmEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-063 PV.WPD L f \ o' N 1 Ini . L . 1 ocks) ., ! ,,\ 1, op-- 11 i , 1 \ t I1 I L I( nt4 flI r G I , — 1 . Nove _1,E` '" 00 ' .1 Ate`' • `T, I yam:. R .,.! - •CE ilfw ill r • -r. •I f 11,7 �S G• rt ei..hl_ p?i.:i\. ; 1 s ESi P ■• cimi.i_..... Ii. .oraW,rr va t.i s.W P.! ___ '_ s ,t\,i, l 111 - i iMif i a ,; ,s-1 I M�1��\I:� .• ,.. "14*W ��� il(C: ktri: —.---;M 4 rr1.1% --owl:0 .-,k, cg- � „et '-Pam• ._F. t t. w I` "� - -:diew0 Alf wig , , -iI'JI —.,, . , Je‘. ili '' _7- Q _ ->/ , _ , i >rirAt ELEMENDRY TRACT MAP � ,' I f RWfi�l � : _111 1`E 1rshRE NriR—.: 1 —93 TUE 05 :57 PM HAWRYLAK&A:_S 0r. I ATES, I NC 8 1 7 429 A220 P. 06 .ig - 063 L CITY OF SOUfHLAKE Plat Vacation Application Complete Title of Plat(to be vacated): L off' ? / '77 seedy A/© ' ix ,4 t? Filing_ Record (Cabinet/Slide or Volume/Page): att4/MA Yi A / Sect 35 4 County: TewergtA.f Filing Date: Turtle I k` [R q7 Total Number of Lots: / Total Gross Acreage: c ,7 9 1v `4PPLICANT Ott'NER(if different) N.t:11E. Kfv111044 ?ad-'A- Zeve tvi .S/ �� ire..i1.4i-e-f4 ADDRESS: 543g Wee tht is/Olds t Glvci, 50S Sot/-it #44/5- sf-. cJ&sr7�xts �szo/ Pto�ectee-/�=kc 6 c. '-ea-us-ig6z P/lONE: }44 — ;57- 02-3 / $30 - 9el0 — oe-c-?-.3 qt'7 - 32-ct - OV-68 I hereby certify that this plat vacation Al' hides all land incorporated within the plat boundary and all land owners within said plat are participating in this request, and that Is plat vacation is in conformance with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance No.483, 'endments and otl r or ; ces, is . n codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is ,:essay •�. ply e applic."f/' - ing and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent this request and address 100 any a P IN ` I , For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the plat vacation application and the application fee in the amount of S on this the dcryof , 19 Signed.: Title: The following checklist is a partial summary of plat vacation requirements as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Subdivision Ordinance No.483,amendments and other ordinances.maps,and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat vacation request. / Completed plat vacation application.The city will type the information on pertinent forms and return to the � Applicant for signatures. L/ One(1)8'/z" x 11"reduction of the plat which is to be vacated. L. t/ Verification that the request for plat vacation includes all land incorporated within the plat boundary and all land owners of property within the plat are participating in the request. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE LW , 1— - -- - -- - -- , ity o! u,ithlal:e, Texas - — - - — —- - -- --1 . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Vacation of Plat Date: June 5, 1998 Whereas. Lee Fahrenbrook,being the cwner of all land included in the plat entitled Lot 1,T. Beedy, No. 72 Aridition, filed for record in Cabinet A, Slide 3584 of the Plat Records, Tarrant, County, Texas, according to the deed recorded in Volume 11412,Page 1918, Deed Records Tarrant County Texas, do hereby declare said plat to be vacated, and do request the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Southlake to approve said vacation. This is to Certify that Lee Fahrenbrook,the undersigned, am the sole owner of the property described above on the date of this application. Lee Fahrenbrook STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT (lir BEFORE ME,the undersigned authority,on this day personally appeared Lee Fahrenbrook, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged;to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. ` G1V UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFI Ste' - , 1998. ` �� MAY .,,,, rtEOFi' l V MnrooW10211 DARES 1 ota Public in and for the State of Texas JULY21,2000 ��/III/i�f//lid%/Jlf!!I! Ap rov�.d by Cityof Southlake, dayof , 1998. P By: Mayor. City of Southlake Return to: Owner: City Secretary Lee Fahrenbrook City of Southlake 505 South Austin Street (iii 667 N. Carroll Ave. Fredericksburg, Texas 78624 Southlake,Texas 76092 r•-,--A*N II Ill 1 51998 s6--q „ MAP-3 1 —9 8 TUE Ac: 9 PM HAWRYLAK&ASSOC I ATES. I NC 8 1 7 429 0220 P. 10 kW . CITY OF SOUTTHLAKE Certificate of Approval We,the undersigned,as duly authorized representatives of the following franchise utility companies,hereby express no objection to the vacation of the plat(and subsequent utility easements and rights-of-way contained within)as shown on the attached exhibit.This plat to be vacated was previously recorded in iv "14 ,51'. e- CabinetiSlide or Volume/Page)of the P 6a Records of_.- Tetor424*County,Texas. Texas Utilities El tri Tri-County Electric Cooperative, AD_Signed: Signed: '' Printed Name: X. Printed Name: 0/1"--D. '.¢.s elf Title: UrIUT) ogS1. Ue b- Title: DC7.72 -T /9•¢/,(•¢aE.0 Date: . Date: _.L..IE 8 f97ts GTE Central, Inc. Lone Star Gas Corn any/ tm Signed: ____ --4 / Signed: Alt Name: 4 e C ook Printed Name: "nth W 'isle: 6x�. :i..t.+i:� Asa4eGA Title: U Ll $Sl Ant L Late: 6—8 ` & `�a Date: giet itlarcus Cable nc. Signed: w Signed: Printed Name: re _ AS Printed Name: Title: itv'4•a.¢ 4-P5 "wt. Title: Date: (y--/—/V Date: Li J&-C .,N�-�.�r.1 u.. O S w.T E`. r .. • + r t' _ \ _ Ir+ i f i!;•1�•111 rill 11 IP ii'T i i7ta d It 90 . z o ri3! i Le' i-i�90:� {df#d ! al 1 I 1 iii •lit *144 111-1 i Mill rig ::11 i jiri ! 1!II!II! 1 Fii!h !ih `11 1 i 1!lo-i . i , 1 .•s it 9 ._ ., r i �: r• 11111. ,r ��, - ligH; iiiki;l hill!!='o:i ;' -4i'1+ `� ' iil s•+i' ••3i9idi� ;i5i = ] 1r +1 �3 t 1 i11h 1r 1i i-i i lei�irl I ._. ii Mimi liilii - •ii a - --! 9 3ii3rtl . � • ,: 1!-. 1 ' 1 rs n 60 CLL 1.1.S..MOO 1 `asp xl' 41 of£' s,s job r' io a`I 1 1/41.1 O • E• = • 5 L- a F 3 . U g: p. 3 j ' W li : 1 .1:... • Cw r .. ------.- 4',LLL'•1.16.moo.: ii it c !l 1.................- • 3nN3AY /rnu 1 16.01.o0 3TINNO1A3d 1 NKMON gP LI ---t— ..!..;--.... _+' ai: ssl: V r6 • City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT July 17, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-064 PROJECT: Plat Vacation - Lots 2 and 1 T. Beedy No. 72 Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Vacation of property legally described as Lots 2 and 3,T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3775,Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas,and being approximately 9.948 acres. LOCATION: East side of North Peytonville Avenue across from the intersection of Plantation Drive and North Peytonville Avenue. OWNER: Carleo A. Capili, M.D., and Regina R. Capili, M.D. APPLICANT: Kingdom Park Developments, L.L.C. CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: None required P&Z ACTION: July 9, 1998; Approved(6-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is the application for the Plat Vacation of Lots 2 and 3, T. Beedy No. 72 Addition. Please note that this plat vacation must be approved and filed of record in Tarrant County prior to filing of the Final Plat for Case ZA98-070, submitted as Pinecastle Pointe Addition. L:\COMDE V\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-064PV.WPD i l'irci (IIIre \ 10'. i 1 -----1 _H,_______ \\ i Ilia 1 , \\ II ( i vsr now s- • 1 • .. . . �.\EM E pip p �� v,, -, .1 ''J t.AR a►- + Roux 1 G't i ;rip ;IRON.° I i 111111 k 10.,.. - , .. .. Low PI Y \ IFCE.SI Pi ! 5 1' ,' 1.,.,. . . Ilk � � 1j q . Mg! _...._- . MAW- 1114 : j[ Mil g .1 10.%4 / MU., tirr.44 '#471 — ill 5 II � N �- ki--0. - Aji 1 �---, 31.°r :, II* •r' ; .EF S i_ iiko Ririll Ilat ------'VAIIIiir 1-11 i ._j____I 444f Illiw AIWA \\ 12411 •„..._1— glls' Ia . ', ,. _ '4 Av. .,, ..- ---- .'. .11 --k ! _ i , 1 1 , , �/ l T . _____r c 4111111.471 _ i .i 5�� I L a CIA"" .....,,,) 544: aE1 errARY J SCHOOL TRACT MAP 5 N-a-- M P-a 1-9$ TUE 05 :57 PM HAWRYLAKe.ASSOC I ATES, I Nr. 817 429 0220 P. 06 Le CITY OF SOUTHLAKE g r._ ‘.,.,i Plat Vacation Application Complete Title of Plat(to be vacated): 1-- 4 3 T 252edy No. 7 - Ad1 tDYt i a li� Filing Record (Cabinet/Slide or Volume/Page): ( e,Gte1. A / s tech •37-75 County: /CCtU`(rYc.ttY" Filing Date: 542e740.44/9c4- 3 lg47 Total Number of Lots: `•7 Total Gross Acreage: '7r440 APPLICANT OWNER(if different) a.Ea R.( t 4 g N:4:trE: K Per4-�=`�'evetapmew lsr ! , 0tier-(o A A . C*711 iI 1S • ciza ADDRESS: 54-38' Wes# Um.vet/spit/ ig(vd. qt P-AveGt. e -bCa ,f ex l a.s -7sa_e 50 t1' eake � s -1eo 2- PHONE: —C�-i357 -0.2-; I S'(- —4m - 5676, FAX: 2-c 46 - 3S? — 0,7-3 — (7 — ei-8/ - s'36 . I hereby certify that this plat vacation includes all land incorporated within the plat boundary and all land owners within said plat are participating in this request, an, •- ) plat vacation is in conformance with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance No.483. amendments and oth- • , ances,m,•s - .'codes of the City of Southlake that pertain to this submittal. I further understand that it is necessary .• •- • 4 nt at t,' applic•l ing and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings to represent this request and address (lie any ur if / !ems - s�i/�4.�i..�' . _/ri,.���ate: VGI.� ,'„- For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the plat vacation application and the application fee in the amount of$ on this the day of , 19 - Signed:— Title: - The following checklist is a partial summary of plat vacation requirements as required by the City of Southlake.The applicant should further refer to the Subdivision Ordinance No.483,amendments and other ordinances,maps,and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this plat vacation request. Completed plat vacation application.The city will type the information on pertinent forms and return to the b Applicant for signatures. C One(1)81/4"x 11" reduction of the plat which is to be vacated. Verification that the request for plat vacation includes all land incorporated within the plat boundary and all Le / land owners of property within the plat are participating in the request. 514-3 CITY OF SOUTEILAKE • - — . City of Southlake,Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Le Vacation of Plat Date: June 5, 1998 Whereas, Carleo A. Capili, M.D. and wife Regina R. Capili, M.D., being the owners of all land included in the plat entitled Lots 2 and 3, T. Beedy,No. 72 Addition, filed for record in Cabinet A, Slide 3775 of the Plat Records, Tarrant, County, Texas, according to the deed recorded in Volume 11643, Page 0671, Deed Records Tarrant County Texas, do hereby declare said plat to be vacated, and do request the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Southlake to approve said vacation. This is to certify that Carleo A. Capili, M.D. and Regina R. Capili, M.D., the undersigned, are the sole owners of the property described above on the date of this application. e-4Qc.7-N—, -..--- re1-3,-,4-. R . C egr-,17- rl'iD Carleo A. Capi i, M.D. Regina R. Capili, M.D. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME.the undersigned authority,on this day personally appeared Carleo A. Capili, M.D. and wife Regina R. Capili, M.D., known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that they executed the sane for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (tire GIVE UNDER MY A SEAL OF OFFICE this the S PI day of , 1998. Q . : . WANDA O. MCALISTER t }f ,a,,`*. NOTARY PUBLIC i otary Public in and for the State of Texas s , State of Texas 'Z.—El°' Comm. Exp. 07-17-2001 • Approved by City of Southlake, day of , 1998. By: Mayor, City of Southlake Return to: Owner: City Secretary Carleo A. Capili,M.D. and Regina R. Capili, M.D. City of Southlake 914 Raven Court 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake,Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 RECD JuiI . 51998 . - • MiiP—._1—98 TUE 05 :59 PM HAWRYLAKC,ASSOC: I ATES. I Nr. 817 429 0220 P. 08 L CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Certificate of Approval We,the undersigned,as duly authorized representatives of the following franchise utility companies,hereby express no objection to the vacation of the plat(and subsequent utility easements and rights-of-way contained within)as shown on the attached ephibit.This plat to be vacated was previously recorded inCabtrwf A , SfEdi. 3171Cabinet/Slide or Volume/Page)of the 714AL Records of__ taltfa-44County,Texas. Texas UtilitiesEle tri Tri-County Electric C0000peerr/ative, Inc. Signed: s 1 Signed: _ � ` ' Printed Name: t /� Printed Name: �oc� Dom�,�/' E,4a"E'tett Title: (Aiiui &&St6&Q� Title: DISl,2/eT 4/0AV4G. Date: r'0 1q/1‘ D Date: .1� vF$ / /�i`l8 GTE Central, Inc. Lone Star Gas Com any Ej.,,,... . > �l Signed: Signed: .�l /'_ Printed Name: Mike--eoo/'C Printed Name: M tCtt <gli rK Litic: C1.\-ter,f �Iitf40e.." Title: (Afii l'T IDESt/ )C.la 't- ate: G _ �'Y Date: (0 9/91S Mairaus Ca4G2„r It -. ' Sammons Communications, Inc. Signed: S Signed: Printed Name: � tfir-ty �.6 Printed slam Title: '1--'r 0(6 /49-'1-' Title: Date: It•--9—`ib ate: L 5N-S gi II •n4.11D)tl A •1:t..%. I . 1 1t S* . 114rd'egiiii.g i 41,7:' (..., , I i wg sli i / e—I I . I 1II !1ii,II1d i ill is iftI ; III i1 1— •il III Ilfihi !.f 1 la • i liii! ll,l ,t ; l ; l + , "f .iili pii Ieo . 1 t!1 full 1f iri; Ilt 1111 ,r ••111 ill I i ti i1 It 'I,1sl :ill 'j1( ; 1 / liar i :IBi1 r l 1111.11 ;I :, H1 :ffi1 l: :1 iaf� i • < p .-:-.••( 4 Hic III f3 1 . Clino":— •—• 1 its oL '%< } I 111 llIu !litI ill y fig j • g L) , I o •' i 1I t 1( 11i T tJ 2il 11111 E©i I 1 iii r li:i i . I I I i I . • 4 • 1 = i e��; , ll i 1 , 4 • .i iI. i1 a s i! el t I t f N F 1 1 _.. 1 iti iL I -S F' - 'y ' w .+c. City of Southlake,Texas ‘Iklw MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Lewis McLain for the development of a Stormwater Drainage Utility System (SDUS) Background During the June City Council Retreat, staff presented information concerning the development of a Stormwater Drainage Utility District (SDUS) to fund drainage improvements and maintenance operations within the City. The advantages and disadvantages of different funding sources were presented to Council and staff was directed to bring forward a proposal concerning a drainage utility district. The attached proposal from Lewis McLain is for the development of a Stormwater Drainage Utility District. This includes establishment of impervious coverage or run-off factors for a number of categories of stormwater users referred to as single-family living unit equivalents (SFLUEs), a financial plan of revenues and expenditures, a training program for employees to implement the SDUS, an educational document for residents, and an ordinance to implement the SDUS. The consultant expects the project to take approximately 90 days at a cost of between $22,000 and $27,000. Recommendation Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement (not to exceed $27,000) with Lewis McLain for the development of a Stormwater Drainage Utility System (SDUS). Please place this item on the July 21, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. 6Wig.., /�J1i7 i BW/cre Attachment: SDUS Proposal L 51-1 • JUL-01-1998 08:13 FROM CITY OF SOUThLAXE TO 4886796 P.02 LProposal To Conduct A Study To Develop and Implement A Stomnwater Drainage Utility System (SOUS) This proposal is mode by Lewis F.McLain,Jr.,Fiscal planning Consultant(LFM),to the City of Southiake to prepare the study,analysis,public hearing and public information documents,interdepartmental training,and steps for implementation of a Stortniter Drainage Utility System(SOUS),The chief objective is to prepare data from Tarrant Appraisal District(TAD)to support reasonable calculations of impervians area far non- residential developed and to apply that tax account data to the City's utility billing accounts.Also,this study and the resuhting implementation of the SOUS must comply with state law that outruns the acceptable methodologies for an SOUS.Specify,the consulting tasks(and supportive staff,legal and engineering efforts)will include the following; • LFM will nark with the staff and Consulting Engineer to develop a basis for establishing the impervious coverage of a category of storm water users referred to as single family living unit equivalents or SFLUEs.All single family wits in the city will be considered one category or class and no attempt will be made to stratify single-family residential accounts.All non-residential properties eligible to receive a charge for SOUS services will be stated as a multiple of one SfLUE. I The impoviaus area for all large non-residential properties will be calculated based on official data available from the records of the Tarrant Appraisal District.Specifically,LFM will provide the conduct the following steps; A Microsoft Access database will be eonetrvcted with every non- residential utility account as of July 1,1998.This data will be downloaded from the(aty's utility Ain system and will contain identification and location data such as account number,occupant name and street address. This database will be the controlling database upon which all land parcels eligible for an SbUS charge shall be matched.Irrigation meters, connstnlction meters aid multiple meters will be identified to be marked and occluded from the SOUS fee.. - A land use database will be constructed from TAD records showing any pertinent data that will assist in the calculation of impervious area including building footprint,parking lots and accessory buildings.Single- 1 «► 51-2 JUL-01-1998 0e:14 FROM CITY OF SOUTFLAIE TO 4886796 P.03 ..... ... .... ..a.....o ..��... . . . ..�.....} ,. ...- .- -....- r (Me faintly data will be excluded as well as vacant,undeveloped property That is,by law,excluded from the SEWS fee.The basis for impervious area will be documented with a hard copy of all tax roil data placed m a notebook for reference purposes. - The next step,and the most time consuming,involves LFM latching the land parcels to the utility billing accounts.Special allocations are normally involved,such as a shopping center with one land/building owner on the tax file but multiple tenant meters on the utility billing system.This matching exercise will also involve exceptions for the staff to review where addressing differences create dfficudties.For instance.TAO street names could differ from the City's utility billing files or the address for a water meter have the adjacent street's name in the case of a corner location.It Is anticipated that several field visits would be required to complete this step. The completed utility billing file with matched land parcels and Impervious data would then be enhanced by the computed SFLUE values. The database would include up to five calculated monthly values(I.e. $4.00 to$12,00 per 5PWE in$2.00 increments). This will provide a working.doannent or tool for two additional examinations.First,the actual monthly fee can be determined for every customer and ranked in descending order so that the larger properties and resulting fees can be (kr reviewed.Second,the City Staff and Consulting Engineer can examine the calculated impervious factors and make adjustments for properties That may have retention facilities or other stor crater management features that might justify a lawn'impervious factor. ▪ LFA will develop a financial Plan conclrrent with the tax rolllutiiity billing database matching exercise.Ns financial plan will include both the operational and capital'weds of the sty over the nett five to ten years,provided by the City Staff acid Consulting Eigineer.The funding capthility at varying fee Weis will be examined and made part of the final report prepared by!.Full. ▪ LFM wilt meeting with the City's Director of Finance and computer consultants to determine The administrative and technical requirements to include the SOUS as part of the monthly utility bill.This will be accomplished early in the study time frame in order to provide the maximum possible time far any reprogramming to take place. 2 ......_ 51-3 JUL-01-1998 08:14 FROM CITY OF SOUTFLAe<E TO 4886796 P.04 (We ■ LPM will develop the forms and procedures,with the input of key City Staff, that will be used to communicate between community development and utility billing staff in order for new non-residential accounts to have the impervious cover computed and included in the newly created customer accounts.LFM will also develop the procedures for an appeal process for non-residential customers wanting to provide technical evidences that supports a lower impervious factor than the and calculated by The City. • LFM will develop instructional materials and conduct in-house training far utility billing,community development and public information personnel to understand the statutory authority,technical concepts and actual calculations expressed in layperson terms in order to be prepared to answer questions from the public. • LFM will develop an explanatory tri-fold in a question and answer format that can be used as a handout or mailouJt document to educate the public on The rationale of the SEWS,the basis for the recommended fee(upon being approved by the City Council)and the intended restricted use of the revenues for stormwaeter management purposes.This Q&A format can also be placed on the Internet for public education purposes. ■ LFM will develop and tailor the mitten document and public notice specifics in order for the City Council to advertise and conduct a public heating on the SDUS creation and the proposed fees to be adopted.These docianents will be (kr subject to review and approval by The City Attorney but are expected to be in good form Sidi that only minor adjustments are required ■ LFM will advise the City's financial staff regarding the creation of a SOUS En t rprise Fund or Special Revalue Fwid,through which all SDUS revenues will be deposited and from which ail expenditures will be earmarked for storm ater management purposes atty. • i.FM will prepare a report and make a presentation to the City Cowell showing the financial plan details at venous foe levels,the specific impact on the non- reside mist properties sad the revenue generation in the aggregate.The report will also include the public education information and pubic notice information , needed to conduct a public hearing.The City Council will provide the policy direction regarding the fee level and any of the discretionary exemptions. 3 se-4 • JUL-01-1998 08:15 FROM CITY OF SOUT1-LA-<E TO 4886796 P.05 • JVL VL tat. NIL..s.e •.CCS__ . • • ••f —• - ___ -_ ____ Timing 4 Fees It is anticipated that L.FM can begin the data collection phase of this study ..�,,.e� immediately and be prepared forthe matching step within 30 days.The matching phase can take from a minimum of 30 days to a much longer time depending on the quality of the data and the availability of the staff to assist in the more difficult cases where special interpretation is rs i i'ed.The report generation,staff and council briefing and preparation for implementation could be done within 30 days of the finaraation of the matching task Therefore,it is anticipated that the study would require a minimum of 90 days if most of the key tasks were accomplished without major complications.It is anticipated that the full implementation would be accomplished between October 1 and December 1,1998. The estimated time and effort for the fiscal and data analysis is 200 to 300 hours. The billing rate will be$90 for LFM end$45 for an associate to assist with the data collection and eornpilation.It is anticipated that the consulting fee will be$Z2,000 to $27,000.There will be no other charges involved in This study other than some consulting ergineerins and legal assistance,both of which are expected to be minimal.This minimal involvement has beam my experience in both grand Prairie and Grapevine. If this proposal is in keeping sit your expectations of the constiltirg assistance needed,please indicate your approval below.As you!slow from almost ten years of Ray (hlosservice with the(Sty,your r etanin in possession of any of the data products and the ,, ultimata appnowl for each of the study stops outlined in this proposal. Sincerely. Lewis F.Stain,Jr. Fiscal Planning Consultant APPROVED: Curtis Hawk,City Manager 4 TOTAL P.05 51-5 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 15, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 646-A, 1st reading amending Ordinance No. 646 Parks and Recreation Board, relating to appointments of the Youth Park Board The Parks and Recreation Board considered the revisions to Ordinance No. 646 at their meeting on Monday, July 13, 1998. As you know, this ordinance has been reviewed by staff to address the appointment of Youth Park Board. As revised, Ordinance No. 646-A defines the Youth Park Board as an advisory board to the Parks and Recreation Board, not an advisory board to the City Council. Sections 6 and 7 of the revised copy of the Ordinance, represent the changes made to the Youth Park Board concerning the responsibility of the Parks and Recreation Board to appoint the members of the Youth Park Board. Upon the unanimous approval from the Parks and Recreation Board, it is requested that this item be placed on the July 20 SPDC agenda and the July 21 City Council agenda for their consideration. Please contact me at extension 824 if you have any questions. BH Attachment: Revised copy of Ordinance No. 646-A with underlines and strikeouts C ORDINANCE NO. 646-A AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NO. 646 ESTABLISHING A PARK AND RECREATION BOARD FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE; ESTABLISHING THE NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS AND THEIR TERMS OF OFFICES; PROVIDING FOR DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARK AND RECREATION BOARD; ESTABLISHING A YOUTH PARK AND RECREATION BOARD; ESTABLISHING QUALIFICATIONS, THE NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS AND THEIR TERMS OF OFFICE; PROVIDING FOR DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE YOUTH BOARD; PROHIBITING CERTAIN TYPES OF CONDUCT IN CITY PARK; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 515; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Southlake, Texas, deems it advisable and necessary to establish a Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, to act as an advisory board to the City Council relating to all nature of park improvements and recreation programs; and C' WHEREAS, the City Council deems it advisable and necessary to establish a Youth Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, to act as an advisory board to the Park and Recreation Board relating to recreation programs and park improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it advisable and necessary to prohibit certain types of conduct within city parks; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. Creation of Park and Recreation Board. There is hereby established the Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Board." Section 2. Number of Board Members, Qualifications and Terms. The Board shall consist of nine (9) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and who shall be appointed by the City Council for three (3) year terms. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through nine (9). C, ,5S-a The City Council in making the appointments to the Board, shall give due consideration to the recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce, Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Park and Recreation Board. The City Council if it deems it desirable, may appoint ex- officio members to the Board. In addition, the chairperson of the Youth Park and Recreation Board shall serve as an ex-officio member of the Board. Such ex-officio members shall be appointed on an annual basis and the term of office of such ex-officio members shall begin on January 1st of each year and end on December 31st of that year. Such ex-officio members shall have no voting authority for park and recreation matters. Vacancies on the Board are to be filled by appointment by the City Council for the length of the unexpired term. Section 3. Board Meetings and By-Laws. The Board, shall meet in the first regular session of each year and shall select from the members a chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary for one year terms and until their successors are elected. The Board shall adopt by- laws to govern the holding of its meetings which, at a minimum, shall encompass the following: a. Regular meetings shall be held on the second Monday of each month. b. Manner of holding and calling of special meetings. c. Majority of members shall constitute a quorum. d. Members not planning to attend a regular meeting or special meeting shall notify the City Secretary or the Chairman of the Board by 12:00 o'clock noon of the meeting day. e. Any member with unexcused absences from two (2) consecutive regular meetings or not exhibiting interest in the work of the Board shall be reported to the City Council which may, at its discretion, remove the Board member and appoint a replacement. f. Minutes of each Board meeting shall be filed with the City Secretary. Section 4. Board Duties and Responsibilities. The duties and responsibilities of the Park and Recreation Board shall be to: a. Act in an advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining to parks and recreation including development of long range capital improvements programs. b. Cooperate with other City boards and commissions, other governmental agencies, civic groups, and all citizens of the city in the advancement of sound park and recreation planning and programming. c. Recommend policies for recreation services and park improvements. d. Recommend programs for development of recreational areas, facilities and improved recreation services. e. Recommend the adoption of standards for recreational areas, facilities and their financial support. f. Review an annual report of existing park and recreation programs and services. g. Review the annual budget of the park and recreation programs prior to submission to the City Council and submit a recommendation on the budget. y 2 53=3 Section 5. Creation of Youth Park and Recreation Board. There is hereby established the Youth Park and Recreation Board for the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Youth Board." Section 6. Number, Qualifications and Terms. a. The Youth Board shall consist of seven (7) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, who must be students enrolled in school in grades seven through twelve. The ' Council Park and Recreation Board shall appoint members for two (2) year terms. The Council Board shall appoint the members using the following procedure: (1) Interested persons meeting the qualifications shall submit an application to the City tacy Director of Parks and Recreation. (2) An interview committee, comprised of four members, one City—Council uneerm-one-Park and Recreation Board member, one member of City staff, as appointed by the City Manager Park and Recreation Director, and one Board member of the Southlake Park Development Corporation, and one member of the Youth Park Board, shall review the applications and conduct interviews if appropriate. (3) The committee shall make recommendations for members to the City Council L Park and Recreation Board, ensuring an even distribution among the age of the applicants. b. The Council Board shall appoint members who shall serve until their successors are appointed, without compensation. c. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through seven (7). Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner provided for regular appointments. In making the initial appointments, the Council Parks and Recreation Board shall appoint four (4) members of the Youth Board for two-year terms and three members for one- year terms. Section 7. Youth Board Meetings and By-Laws. The Youth Board, shall meet in the first regular session of each year and shall select from the members a chairman, vice- chairman, and secretary for one year terms and until their successors are elected. The Youth Board shall adopt by-laws to govern the holding of its meetings which, at a minimum, shall encompass the following: a. Regular meetings shall be held once each month. b. Manner of holding and calling of special meetings. c. Majority of members shall constitute a quorum. C .... d. Members not planning to attend a regular meeting or special meeting shall notify the City Secretary Director of Park and Recreation or the Chairman of the Youth Board by 12:00 o'clock noon of the meeting day. e. Any member with unexcused absences from two (2) consecutive regular meetings or not exhibiting interest in the work of the Youth Board shall be reported to the 6i Ceuacil Park and Recreation Board which may, at its discretion, remove the Board member and appoint a replacement. f. Minutes of each Youth Board meeting shall be filed with the City Secretary. Section 8. Duties of the Youth Park and Recreation Board. The duties and responsibilities of the Youth Park and Recreation Board shall be to: a. Act in an advisory capacity to the Park and Recreation Board in all matters pertaining to parks and recreation, including development of long range capital improvement programs. b. Recommend policies for recreation services and park improvements. c. Recommend youth-related programs for development of recreational facilities, areas and improved recreation services. d. Prepare and submit to the Park and Recreation Board and annual review of youth- related parks and recreation programs and services. Section 9. Definitions. a. Alcoholic Beverage shall be defined to include any alcohol and any beverage containing more than one-half (1/2) of one percent of alcohol by volume which is capable of use for beverage, either alone or when diluted. b. City park shall be defined to be any park, playground or recreational area owned, leased, operated or under the control of the City of Southlake. This definition shall include any athletic field, swimming pool, gymnasium, tennis court, and other similar facility owned by the Carroll Independent School District and specified in the joint-use agreement between Carroll Independent School District and the City of Southlake. Section 10. Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or consume any alcoholic beverage in any city park. Section 11. Riding or Driving Horses in City Park. Except on designated horse trails, it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or ride a horse or horses within any city park. Section 12. Riding or Driving Off-Road Vehicles in City Park. Except on designated off-road trails, it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or ride an off-road vehicle within any city park. For the purposes of this section, an off-road vehicle is a vehicle designed and equipped for use of any paved roadway with such definition to specifically include off-road ci motor bikes, go-carts, and dune-buggies. 4 Section 13. Vehicular Traffic Prohibited in Certain Areas. Except in designated overflow parking areas, it shall be unlawful for any motor vehicle to stand, stop, park or cross onto or into any portion of a city park other than upon a roadway or parking area so designated for suck purposes. Section 14. Time limitations on Public Use of Park. Except for a city sponsored event, it shall be unlawful for any person to use, enter into or be within a city park during any posted hours during which the park is closed. Section 15. Littering. Littering is hereby prohibited in any city park. Littering shall include leaving trash or other items by persons picnicking within a city park and not placing trash and other items in appropriate trash receptacles provided in such park. Section 16. Firearms Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry on or about himself or to discharge a gun, pistol, rifle, or other firearm within any city park except that a person duly licensed by the State of Texas to carry a concealed handgun may carry a concealed handgun in accordance with State law. Section 17. Rollerblading prohibited except in designated areas. It shall be unlawful for any person to use rollerblades on tennis courts and other posted areas in any city park. Section 18. Hitting Golf Balls Prohibited. Except in designated areas, it shall be unlawful for any person to hit golf balls in city parks. Section 19. Smoking Prohibited Except in Designated Areas. It shall be unlawful to smoke in bleachers, dugouts, or other congested outdoor areas at city parks. Section 20. Bicycling Prohibited in Certain Areas. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle on other than an improved vehicular road or path designated for that purpose. A bicyclist shall be permitted to wheel or push a bicycle by hand over any grassy areas or wooded trail or on any paved area reserved for pedestrian use only. Section 21. Glass Containers Prohibited in City Park. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess a glass container in a city park. Section 22. Variances. The City Manager may issue special permits or grant variances to the provisions of this ordinance. The Southlake Park & Recreation Board will make recommendations regarding variances to the City Manager. A special permit variance shall not be granted by the City Manager unless a written request is submitted which demonstrates: a. Special circumstances exist which are peculiar to the applicant's ability to utilize city parks; and C 5 b. That use of the city park by other groups or individuals will not be adversely affected by granting the special permit variance. Section 23. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 515 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 24. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Section 25. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 26. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to L any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 515 or any other ordinances affecting city parks which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 27. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 28. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 6 L PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS 1998. DAY OF MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY (hare EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney • 7 j-,T-8 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorizing the Mayor to Enter into a Five Year, October 1998-September 2003, Contract for Technical Services and Fee Schedule with Trinity River Authority (TRA) for Central Regional Wastewater System BACKGROUND The attached Contract for Technical Services with Trinity River Authority of Texas (TRA) is a contract for TRA to provide inspection, sampling, and analytical services for any industrial discharges into the City's sanitary sewer system The contract is for five years, October 1998 to September 2003, and specifies that the fee should not exceed the amount of$17,500 ($3,500.00/year). COMMENTS Staff's recommendation is to place authorizing the Mayor to enter into a five year, October 1998- September 2003, Contract for Technical Services and Fee Schedule with Trinity River Authority (TRA) for the Central Regional Wastewater System on the July 21, 1998, Regular City Council Agenda for consideration. : /ls attachment: Contract for Technical Services Technical Services Fee Schedule M:\W D-FILES\SEWER\TRA\98-2003CONTRACT.DOC 5K-1 Trinity River Authority of Texastr Central Regional Wastewater System 3110.500.042.101 :- G : June 25. 1998 -. -4�''/C�, Mr. Curtis Hawk City Managerflita City of Southlake C� 9 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk: Subject: Contract for Services - Fiscal Year 1999 Revised Technical Services Fee Schedule (kr Central Regional Wastewater System The Trinity River Authority Board of Directors, in board action June 24, 1998, approved the Technical Services Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 1999 which is in connection with all contracting work relating to the analysis of water and wastewater, industrial inspections, and/or sampling services. As in past years we propose to continue performing associated services to all Authority Contracting Parties under the provisions of a contract for services. Enclosed please find two (2) copies of the Trinity River Authority Contract for Services and Fee Schedules for Fiscal Year 1999 attached for your review and official authorization. Upon the City's approval for requested services between the City and Trinity River Authority, please return both notarized or sealed copies with Attachment A - Technical Services Fee Schedules for final execution to this office. After execution by the Authority's General Manager, one (1) original Contract for Services will be returned for your files unless otherwise noted by the City. P.O. Box 531196 Grand Prairie,Texas 75053 Metro(214)263-2251 Fax:(214)264-1382 Fax:(214)262-0619 5K-2 Rey cJMPapa (4weJune 25, 1998 Contract for Services Fiscal Year 1999 Page 2 Please address and refer the correspondence regarding this matter to: Trinity River Authority Central Regional Wastewater System 6500 W. Singleton Blvd. Dallas. Texas 75212 Attention: Wm. B. Cyrus Manager. Technical Services To coordinate our efforts accordingly, the Authority requests the approval of the contract to begin on October 1, 1998. and terminate on date specified by the contracting party in Section VI . Please note that the contract may now be greater than one (1) year at the contracting party's preference. Also enclosed are additional copies of our Board Approved Fiscal Year 1999 Services Fee Schedule for your use and files. The service fees are effective December 1. 1998 through November 30, 1999. Historically the fee schedule for these services is derived annually from the direct costs of performing each test, including manpower, materials, supplies, and equipment costs. Additionally, the cost associated with maintaining quality assurance is included in the cost of the test. Should you have any questions concerning this contract or changes in fee schedule, please contact this office at your convenience. Sincerely, WM. B.CYRUS Manager, Technical Services BC/jm Enclosures L 5K-3 CONTRACT FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES I . CONTRACTING PARTIES The Receiving Agency: City of Southlake , whose authorized address is 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 The Performing Agency: Trinity River Authority of Texas. whose authorized address is 5300 South Collins. P. 0. Box 240. Arlington. Texas 76010. Attention: Danny F. Vance. General Manager (or his designated representative) . II. STATEMENT OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED In order to discharge the responsibilities associated with the enforcement of Federal . State, and City regulations, the Receiving Agency requires services of a laboratory qualified to perform water and wastewater analysis, and of personnel to conduct industrial inspection and/or sampling services , such services detailed in Section A. Subsection(s) 1, 2, & 3 , below. A. PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES 1. Industrial Inspection Services In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to perform industrial inspection services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet. The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) shall perform all Industrial Pretreatment Inspections , review permit applications and prepare for submittal Permits to Discharge Industrial Wastes to the Sanitary Sewer in accordance with procedures established by the Trinity River Authority of Texas in accordance with 40 CFR Part 403.8. Industrial Pretreatment Inspections, Application reviews and Permit preparations and submittals shall be in compliance with the Receiving Agency's Industrial Waste Ordinances, Sewer Ordinances Numbers 567 , and EPA General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New Sources. Records of Inspections, Applications and Permits shall be maintained as required by EPA General Pretreatment Regulations. 40 CFR Part 403. 12. 2. Industrial Sampling Services In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to perform industrial sampling services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet and in accordance with the Receiving Agency's Industrial Waste Ordinances and Sewer Ordinances Numbers 567 5K-4 The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) shall perform all sample collections, sample preservation, and maintenance of chain-of-custody records in accordance to the approved procedures set forth in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, EPA Manual SW-846, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes . EPA Manual EPA-600/4-79-020, and the Handbook for Sampling and Sample Preservation of Water and Wastewater, EPA Manual EPA-600/4-82-029. The samples shall be properly collected, preserved and delivered by the Performing Agency to the Performing Agency's laboratory located at 6500 West Singleton Blvd. . Dallas, Texas. When feasible flow or time composited sampling will be conducted. When composited sampling is not feasible, grab sampling will be appropriate. 3. Analytical Services In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to perform analytical services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet. The Receiving Agency will collect samples and deliver them to the laboratory for analysis. It is understood that these samples will be properly collected and preserved in accordance with applicable sections of A Practical Guide to Water Quality Studies of Streams, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration publication and Methods for. Chemical Analysis for Water and Wastes. EPA manual , as well as the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. A chain-of-custody procedure shall be maintained in the field and the laboratory in accordance with procedures to be established by the Receiving Agency. The Receiving Agency will furnish chain-of-custody tags. The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) will perform all analyses according to the approved procedures set forth in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, current edition or the latest edition of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA manual . Samples will be analyzed by these methods on the production basis. to include appropriate analytical quality assurance procedures. Records will be kept for documentation of the Performing Agency's quality assurance program and copies will be available to the Receiving Agency upon request. Unusual interferences and problems will be reported to the Receiving Agency at its authorized address noted above. Research into specific techniques to overcome these difficulties will be undertaken when practical . and by mutual agreement. The sample information sheet submitted with each sample will designate the particular analysis or analyses to be made of each sample submitted. The laboratories will be operated in such a manner as to insure the legal sufficiency of the sample handling: analytical and reporting procedures ; and to remedy effects in the procedures should such be discovered. 5K-5 The various laboratory personnel shall be directed upon receipt of written notice from the Receiving Agency 72 hours in advance, to appear and testify in enforcement actions. In such event. travel and per diem expenses for such employees shall be paid by the Receiving Agency. Travel and per diem for court appearances hereunder shall be based on current State laws. Receiving Agency may deliver to Performing Agency samples for analysis separate and apart from those samples collected by the Performing Agency. When the Receiving Agency delivers samples to the Performing Agency for analysis, the Receiving Agency shall indicate the nature and extent of the analyses it desires to be conducted. Performing Agency shall not be responsible for the manner of collection or chain-of-custody tags or sheets which are matters entirely outside Performing Agency's control . Performing Agency shall receive, log and perform such analyses of samples in accordance with that part of the chain-of-custody procedures identified as Transfer of Custody and Shipment attached hereto. Samples analyzed to maintain the normal quality assurance program which the Performing Agency presently maintains in its laboratory will be charged to the Receiving Agency at the same rate as submitted samples. B. TERMINATION Either party to this Contract may terminate the Contract by giving the other party thirty (30) days notice in writing at their authorized address as noted previously. Upon delivery of such notice by either party to the other and before expiration of the thirty (30) day period, the Performing Agency will proceed promptly to cancel all existing orders. contracts, and obligations which are chargeable to this Contract. As soon as practicable after notice of termination is given. the Performing Agency will submit a voucher for work performed under this Contract through its termination. The Receiving Agency will pay the Performing Agency for the work performed less all prior payments. Copies of all completed or partially completed reports, documents, and studies prepared under this Contract will be delivered by the Performing Agency to the Receiving Agency when and if this Contract is terminated prior to the completion of the prescribed work. C. AMENDING THE CONTRACT The parties hereto without invalidating this Contract may alter or amend this Contract upon advance written agreement of both parties to exclude work being performed or to include additional work to be performed and to adjust the consideration to be paid hereunder by virtue of alterations or amendments. 5K-6 III . BASIS FOR CALCULATING REIMBURSABLE COSTS The financial basis for calculating reimbursable costs shall be as stated in Attachment A, said "Attachment A" shall be revised and updated annually. A cost analysis shall be prepared each year by the Trinity River Authority of Texas and shall be approved by the Trinity River Authority Board of Directors prior to effective date of said revision. The expenditures by the Trinity River Authority of Texas of funds paid to it under this Contract shall be subject to such State or Federal audit procedures as may be required by law and by accepted practices of the State or Federal auditor, or both, if requested. The Trinity River Authority of Texas shall be responsible for maintaining books of account that clearly, accurately and currently reflect financial transactions. The financial records must include all documents supporting entries on the account records which substantiate costs. The Trinity River Authority of Texas must keep the records readily available for examination for a period of three (3) years after the close of the last expenditure. Reimbursement for the inspection, sampling, and/or analytical costs. and cost for any travel and per diem expenses shall not exceed dollars ($ ) for the period of this Contract. IV. CONTRACT AMOUNT The total amount of this Contract shall not exceed dollars ($ ) nor be less than five hundred dollars ($ 500 ) , per annum, unless mutually agreed by the parties hereto. V. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES The Performing Agency shall bill the Receiving Agency monthly for services performed. Charges for these services shall be based on the attached cost schedules. The Receiving Agency shall pay the monthly billings of the Performing Agency within thirty (30) days of their receipt. VI . TERM OF CONTRACT This Contract is to begin October . 19 98 and shall terminate September 2003, subject to Section I I , paragraph B of this contract. 5K-7 VII . INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Inasmuch as the Receiving Agency and the Performing Agency are political subdivisions of this state, and inasmuch as the testing of water and wastewater are critical to the maintenance of public health and such testing is therefore, a governmental function and service, this contract shall be deemed authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act. art. 4413(32c) , Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Receiving Agency: Performing Agency: CITY OF Southlake TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS BY: BY: TITLE: Mayor r.ENERAL MANAGER DATE: DATE: ATTEST: ATTEST: (SEAL) (SEAL) 5K-8 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROCEDURES Sample Collection 1 . To the maximum extent achievable, as few people as possible should handle a sample. 2. Stream and effluent samples should be obtained using standard field sampling techniques and preservation procedures . 3. Chain-of-Custody tags or sheets should be attached to each sample at the time it is collected. The tag or sheet contains basically laboratory (requested parameters) information; however, certain identifying items including City, City Code, Type Sample. Material Sampled, and Method of Preservation must be completed by the field personnel collecting the sample. In completing the Chain-of-Custody tag or sheet, care should be utilized to insure that all necessary information is correctly and legibly entered onto the form. A black ballpoint with water proof ink should be used at all times. Transfer of Custody and Shipment 1. All samples should be handled by the minimum possible number of persons. 2. All incoming samples shall be received by the custodian, or his alternate. and logged into a record book (log book) . Information to be entered into the Log Book shall include the sample number, date received. source, time(s) sampled, date(s) sampled, and analyses requested. 3. Promptly after logging, the custodian will distribute the sample to an analyst or place the sample in the sample room, which will be locked at all times except when samples are removed or replaced by analysts. 4. The custodian shall ensure that heat-sensitive samples , or other sample materials having unusual physical characteristics. or requiring special handling, are properly stored and maintained. 5. Samples shall be kept in the sample storage security area at all times when not actually being used by analysts . such as during overnight absences. 6. The analysis sheet will be signed and dated by the person performing the tests and retained as a permanent record in the laboratory. 7. Test results shall be sent by the laboratory to the appropriate Receiving Agency control point. 5K-9 ATTACHMENT A Trinity River Authority of Texas Central Regional Wastewater System 11111111111 TECHNICAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE FOR LABORATORY ANALYSES INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL SAMPLING FISCAL YEAR 1999 December 1. 1998 through November 30. 1999 6500 W.Singleton Blvd. Dallas,Texas 75212 Metro(972)263-2251 Admin Fax:(972)264-1382 5K-1 0 Recycled paper Lab Fax(972)262-0619 CHEMICAL ANALYSES • WATER Lolkalinity. Total $ 7.05 pH $ 4.75 kalinity. Phenolphthalein $ 6.85Sediment $ 8.15 Y P pH Bicarbonate $ 9.20 Phenols: Carbonate $ 9.20 High Level $ 42.00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (B005) $ 18.80 Low Level $ 68.40 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOOS) S 19.25 Phosphorus: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-B0020) $ 18.80 Ortho $ 8.00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (B0020) $ 18.80 Total $ 12.65 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (B00-7) $ 18.80 Solids: Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 9.50 Total (TS) $ 6.95 Chloride $ 7.00 Total Dissolved(TDS) $ 11.75 Chromium Hexavalent $ 14.30 Total Suspended(TSS) $ 9.60 Chromium Hexavalent - Low Level $ 18.25 Volatile Suspended (VSS) After TSS $ 5.30 Conductance. Specific $ 5.55 Sulfate $ 17.60 Conductance. Diluted S 9.40 Sulfide $ 8.70 Cyanide $ 37.80 Surfactants • MBAS $ 34.90 Cyanide (Amendable to Chlorination) $ 44.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons $ 58.60 Fluoride. Dissolved $ 10.75 Total Organic Carbon $ 11.75 Fluoride. Total $ 10.30 Turbidity $ 5.80 Glycols $ 8.80 Hardness S 10.45 Ignitability (Pensky-Martens) $ 45.25 SEDIMENT Nitrogen: Ammonia $ 8.15 Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 25.00 Kjeldahl. Total $ 14.15 Cyanide $ 39.60 Nitrate $ 8.00 Nitrogen. Kjeldahl, Total $ 18.00 Nitrite $ 8.00 Oil and Grease $ 27.20 Organic $ 30.90 Phosphorus. Total $ 14.85 Oil and Grease $ 32.40 Solids. Total Volatile $ 11.40 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons $ 51.80 CP/AA METAL ANALYSES (TOTAL) PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS $10.00 EACH $151.05 TOTAL Antimony Iron Thallium Barium Lead Tin Antimony Mercury Beryllium Manganese Uranium Arsenic Nickel Cadmium Molybdenum Vanadium Beryllium Selenium Chromium Nickel Zinc Cadmium Silver Cobalt Silver Chromium Thallium Copper Tellurium Copper Zinc Lead $8.10 EACH (DISSOLVED) SAMPLE PREPARATION Aluminum Potassium Boron Silica Sediment and Oils $ 16.50 Calcium Sodium TCLP Toxicity Leachate $105.00 Magnesium $17.80 EACH Arsenic Selenium Lead Low Level Copper - Low Level Cadmium - Low Level Thallium - Low Level (mtv,t5 EACH rcury 5K-11 • GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSES PRIORITY POLLUTANTS (GC/MS) PESTICIDES/PC8'S (mefstiles $ 125.00 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons. $.128.00 . Neutrals $ 248.50 Organophosphate Pesticides. and d Extractables $ 248.50 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Sample preparation. extraction, and clean-up per sample) ORGANIC DETERMINATION (GC) ADD for Chlorinated Hydrocarbon $ 62.25 Hydrocarbon/Solvents Pesticides 608 (Confirmation and quantification per sample) General Hydrocarbon/Solvent $ 105.00 ADO for Organophosphate Pesticide $ 63.75 Scan (VOA) (One column); (Confirmation and quantification *Five or less components: per sample) including quantification ADO for Polychlorinated Biphenyls $ 67.80 Volatile Organic Constituents $ 75.60 (PCB) - Water (Confirmation and (EPA regulated - method 601/602) quantification per sample) *ADO fifteen dollars ($15) ADO for PCB - Oil (Confirmation and for each extra component quantification per sample) scanned and quantified $ 43.20 TRIHALOMETHANES Trihalomethanes $ 48.40 HERBICIDES SAMPLE PREPARATION Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid $ 115.00 ADD for Special Treatment/Per $ 22.90 Herbicides (Confirmed and Sample (Sediment. Oil) quantified) ADO for Special Treatment/Per Sample $ 105.00 (TCLP Toxicity Leachate) cirCIAL ANALYSES TCLP/EP TOXICITY PRIORITY POLLUTANTS Leachate Extraction Procedure $ 105.00 Cyanides $ 37.80 Metals: Arsenic. Barium. Cadmium Metals $ 151.05 Chromium. Lead. Mercury. Selenium Silver $ 101.05 Organics: Endrin: Lindane: Methoxychlor: Toxaphene: 2. 4. D; 2. 4. 5-TP Silvex $ 299.10 MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSES Chlorophyll "a" $ 9.90 Chlorophyll "a" and Pheophytin "a' $ 9.90 Coliform. Fecal (MF) $ 9.85 Coliform. Fecals (MPN) $ 66.60 Coliform. Total (MF) $ 9.70 Coliforms. Total (MPN) $ 22.00 Coliforms. Total (MHO/MUG) $ 9.30 Microscopic General Examination $ 12.90 Microtox. Bacterial Bioassay $ 45.65 Streptococcus. Fecal (MF) $ 10.20 Heterotrophic Plate Count $ 10.10 TOXICITY TESTING C ic. C. dubia (3 Brood) - Call for Quotation c. P. promelas (Fathead Minnow - 7 Day) - Call for Quotation C. dubia - Call for Quotation Acu e. D. pulex - Call for Quotation Acute. P. promelas (Fathead Minnow) - Call for Quotation 5K-12 INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT SERVICES INDUSTRIAL SAMPLING INDUSTRIAL INSPECTION Lomposite Sample S 75.00 Inspection/On Site S 70.00 iditional Composite Sample S 25.00 rab Sample S 35.00 Permit Preparation S150.00 Additional Grab Sample S 10.00 • Installation of Automatic Composite Samplers - Permit Application Review - Grab Sampling - Verification of Application Data - Delivery to TRA Laboratory - Consultation with Industries on Industrial - Field Testing Available Pretreatment • • Sample Preservation - Chemical Inventory Review - Proper Chain of Custody GENERAL SERVICE INFORMATION 1. Effective Date: December 1. 1998. all prices listed are per sample and subject to review. 2. All analyses are run in accordance with 'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.' 18th Edition. 1992 and/or EPA 'Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes.' 1983 and the 3rd Edition of Solid Waste Manual SW 846. 3. The prices effective December 1. 1996 include a 10 X charge added to the analyses cost to maintain the normal quality assurance program. 4. Customer required priority laboratory samples completed and reported within 50X of the normal time will be billed at one and one-half times the routine rate. Emergency samples run inmediately or ASAP will be billed at two times the routine rate. 5. Sample preparations, if required, are charged additionally as listed. 6.• Sample containers, preservatives, and supplies will be provided upon request at a reasonable charge. Bacte- riological sampling supplies are included in the cost of the analyses. Lie Samples* should be delivered to the laboratory before 4:00 p.m. on weekdays. Samples cannot be accepted on weekends or holidays unless special arrangements are made in advance. *(Bacteriological samples should be delivered prior to 2:00 p.m. unless special arrangements are made in advance. After-hour samples may be left in cold storage vault with analyses request form.) 8. Billing statements for completed monthly analyses are mailed by the 15th of the following month. 9. Laboratory hours are weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and weekends 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. 10. Environmental Field. Engineering Field and Pretreatment Services office hours are Monday through Friday. 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. For after-hour emergencies, leave message with computer operator. 11. Environmental Field and Engineering Field Services are requested to be scheduled a minimum of 72 hours in advance. FOR MORE INFORMATION. CONTACT: METRO: (972) 263-2251 FAX: (972) 262-0619 William 8. Cyrus Manager. Technical Services Cathy Henderson Cynthia Belvin John Herndon. P.E. Kimberly Brown. Quality Laboratory Division Chief Pretreatment Coordinator Environmental Services Coord. Assurance Coordinator Mark Orbeck Technical Services Engineer (so, 5K-13 V City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM Jul y y 7, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent SUBJECT: Change Order#2 to add linear footage of pipe rail fence at Bob Jones Park under contract with Ratliff Iron Works, Inc. Attached is change order#2 to add linear footage of pipe rail fence beyond the current scope and budget. The current contract will resume next week following substantial completion of the parking lot. This second change order will add approximately 400 linear feet to the present fence under the original contract with Ratliff Iron Works, Inc. The original budget fenced the north and west sides of the soccer fields for$38,750. The east and south sides were held pending future improvements. The current contract totals $38,725 which includes change order#1 ($2,100) for gates. The approximate 400 linear feet requested would completely satisfy the needed northeast fencing at a cost of$6,712 or$16.78 per linear foot. With the agreeable price presently offered by the current contractor, we recommend approval for the continuation of the project. Upon completion of SPDC approved grading revisions by James Arnold Construction, the exact linear footage will be determined on-site. Pending approval by SPDC, additional fencing improvements would not be requested until development near the proposed main park entrance and loop road. We request you place this item on the July 20, 1998 SPDC agenda and the July 21, 1998 City Council agenda for their consideration. Please contact me or Kevin Hugman, Interim Parks and Recreation Director if you have any questions. BH Attachment: Change Order#2 .�k.-/ I 7 CHANGE ORDER No.1 Lor Dated: June 25, 1998 Project Bob Jones Park-Perimeter Pipe Rail Fencing OWNER City of Southlake Contract For Painted Fence 4'with cable and panel Contract Date February 26. 1998 To: Ratliff Iron Works. Inc. Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract: City of Southlake Owner By Dated , 1998 (kir' Nature of Changes: Remove Following Items From Contract: Quantity Unit Price Total 1) None n/a n/a $ 0.00 Total Deleted = $ 0.00 Additional Work to be Constructed: Quantity Unit Price Total 1) To install additional linear footage of same fence as currently being installed under contract. 4001.f. $ 16.78 $ 6,712 Total Added = $ 6,712 Total Amount Change Order= $ 6,712 Page 1 of 2 5� -a 71 These Changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time: Contract Price Prior to This Change Order $ 36,625.00 Total of Previously Approved Change Order $ 2,100.00 Net Resulting from This Change Order $ 6.712.00 Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 45.437.00 NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B(1978 Edition) Contract Time Prior to This Change calendar days Net Resulting from This Change Order 0 Current Contract Time Including This Change Order calendar days The Above Changes Are Approved: Curtis E. Hawk City Manager Lif By Date , 1998 The Above Changes Are Accepted: Ratliff Iron Works. Inc. Contractor By Date , 1998 • • Page 2 of 2 -3 „—=� City of Southiake, Texas ir (kr, MEMORANDUM July 15, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent SUBJECT: Approve Change Order#1 for Pittman Construction to modify drainage improvements for Bicentennial Park Expansion,Phase II As mentioned in the SPDC meeting of April 20, 1998, staff agreed to work with Mesa Design Group and Pittman Construction to design a more efficient drainage system. This change order serves to address that issue. Inform Construction(once considered for award of contract) had presented a$90,000 cost savings under a new drainage plan. This plan proposed a significant amount of surface drainage with slopes of less than one percent. The conditions of this site would violate the criteria within the Drainage Ordinance for collection of storm water under various flood events. Thus, the plan reviewed by Inform is not feasible at this site. Upon the conclusion of the Brunson property, staff with Mesa reviewed various options to resolve the drainage conditions. The underground pipe material was changed from reinforced concrete pipe to plastic. A detention facility has been included to assist in (be flood events and to satisfy the need for fill material without hauling from Bob Jones Park. The cost savings for the underground storm system total $19,377. However, with the inclusion of the detention facility and weir caused the earthwork cost to increase $14,250. The ability to save the hauling costs associated with the necessary fill material allows the savings of approximately$40,000. If you have any questions, you can contact me at extension 824. BH Attachment: Change Order 1 and Letter from Pittman Construction 5,22,/ F. I) ()wNtN a ORDER ARC.1ItTEC.T X CONTRACTOR X li FIELD i41A IXA'1!..WENT 6701 O'EN R 0 i rROJE±: Bicentennial Park Phs II CHANGE ORDER NUMBER. 1 ( .11me• ) Bid Package #1 • 400 N. White Chapel DATE, 7-21-98 hlake. TX 76092 To CO CT(�iP.ut ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: q 7 0 4 g (name, ,) Pittman Construction. Inc. • 5511 Dorothy CONTRACT DATE: 6-16-98 ', Fort Worth, TX 76119 CONTRACT FOR:proposed park improvements for Bicentennial Park Phase II . Bid he C is changed as follows: Package No. 1 . ' Rev scone to grading, storm sewer, and utilities per plans dated revised • ?-2 -98. • • L INC*valid until signed by ttts Ownnr, Architect and Contractor. 'The of (Contract Sum)(Guaranteed Mmmum Price)was $5 9 0.6 4 6.0 0 tict chin by previnucly authoriuti(]tstnge Otderc . . . . . . . . . . . S The(C sum)(Guaranteed Maximum Price)pntx to this Change Order was . . i 5 9 0,6 4 6.0 0 The(CC rxY Sum)(Guaranteed Maximum Price)will he(increased)(tkcYraaed) . (unc ngd)by this Change Order in the:mWt MInt Of s (5, 127.00) `ncc new Contract Sum)(Guaramccd Maximum Price)including thic Change Order will he 5 8 5,519.0 0 The Con*ct Time will be(increneed)(dtcreased)(unchanged)by ( )days- 'Me Cl atin(Substantial Completion as aft date of this(lunge Order therefore is f1UTE: '' MD minimal.dncs not reflect thaws in the:Wilmer sum,Glntr ct Time or(,turArtxed Maximum Price shall love bcco tuthtnimi hM , Ctm.tnectkile Chuntx Dtrcctivc. ;MRsAiDesigT rro"p Pittman Construction. Inc. City of. $outhlakr y1RCI Ill tin' CONTRACTOR OWNFR ;3100 McKinnon St. #905 5511 Durothy 400 N. White Chapel Addre.s r .1ddn.< Adtlrm 'Dallis, TX 75201 Ft. Worth, TX 76119 Southlake, TX 76092 t!1' R1' — ... _ oY _. ()ATV . DATE . . _ _ Un'I 1• _._ - — Li MA r CAUTION: You should AIA document which has this tiinted in red. An original assures that changessignan will notoriginal be obscured as may occur when documentscauon seepr reproduced. t AIA OM • auuett:e ORDER • nor' 0)iTion • Ale • fJt11dI • me /�y/� At4ERt INLCTiTLTF OFAtt:nf EL 15. I'�i Ntw Y(MK Avl.. NW. vrw.nn tritx+. O.(:. 2lt>trb 0 01-1917 • YMMIING:itt:Oeaead ptMoeopying Wiliam"U.&aaprigftM Um sew is*Are is legel psseatt lem £0f) SL9.ON - _ 5719-a LT:9T 86/0Ti2t PlyCity of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 15, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent SUBJECT: Approve Change Order#2 for Pittman Construction for Concrete Material Cost As is evident with many of the projects in progress, the demand for concrete has resulted in an increase in cost to obtain. Pittman Construction was awarded Bid Package 1 for Bicentennial Park Phase II at the SPDC April meeting. Given the time that has elapsed before submitting a Notice to Proceed, Pittman Construction has requested Change Order #2 to address the increase in material cost only. The attached letter from Pittman Construction indicates a$10.00 per cubic yard increase in cost. The price obtained by the contractor will be guaranteed until December 1, 1998. The quantity of concrete necessary to complete Bid Package 1 is 1,200 cubic yards. The increase requested amounts to $12,000. If you have any questions, you can contact me at extension 824. BH Attachment: Change Order 2 and Letter from Pittman Construction CH GE OWNER OR R4 ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR IN FIELD AIA DdICGMEVT G701 0 OTHER0 • • 'PROJECt: Bicentennial Park Phase II CHANGE ORDER NI!MIER 2 Bid Package #1 !( . address) 400 N. White Chapel DATE: 7-21-98 t' Quth1ake, TX 76092 TO CO$TRAL l' l t tmari Construction Inc. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 97043 (name. cldress) 5 511 Durothy CONTRACT DATE: 6—16—9 8 Fort Worth. TX 76119 CONTRACT FOR' Propo ed park improvements a for Bicentennial Park Phase Ipi . Bid Package No. 1 . The Co{tract is changed as followa: Conc4ete material cost increases related to shortages. • (kitoe : Not valid until signed by the Owner,Architect and Contractor. :The on (C13ntract Sum)(Guarantee-Al Maximum Price)was 1590,646.00 Net O. by previously authorized Change Orders s (5, 127.00 Y. The(CO tract Sum)(Guaareccd Maximum Nrice)prior to this Change Older was s5 8 5, 511.0 0 :The( ct. trC ct sum)(Guantmeed Maximum Price)will be(ii ' 1.cd)(decreased) (un Judged)by this Change Order in the amount of 1 12,000.00 The ne4Cornract Sum)(Guanrttred Maximum Price)include*des Change Order will he . -s5 9 7,519.00 The Contract Tune will be(increased)(decreased)(unchanged)by ( )days. The duel of Substantial Completion id of the date o t Chartge Order therefore is !NOTE.. This wnuttarc,kui slot reflect chant s in the:(ixltrea Sum.Contract Time or(ivararttcctl M:Lximunt I'rICC which have been atithoritetl h% ConsrrUCriim Chanute Ibredicr MESA Design Group Pittman Construction Inc. City of Southlake ARCH! • :T (4)NTRACTOR UWnf.R Lltoximanauxim_51„Alsa_ 5511 Durothy 400 N. White Chapel ;AtkJhii Address Address Dallas. TX 75201 Fort Worth. TX 76119 Southlake. TX 76092 BY 4by RV DA1"L _- DATE .._ DATE. . AIA 9 CAUTION: You should sign an original AIA document which has this caution printed in red. nf. An original assures that changes will not be obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. i AIA G70I • CHA.V(:E ORDER • 1$17 e1N770U' • Ale • O1 • THE /�±��,, AA�� AMERK.AI(iPtl'Ttll rt Ut AK(:nITECTS. 1755 NEW YORJ( AVt..i\.w.. WAJtiiNGT JN. U.t;. 2wub G701-1987 WARNING:Unlicensed photocopying Waldo.US.copyright loss end Is subject to legal pIoYCrtlm1. 20d 52,9'ON N- c , LI:9i 86/0I/ZI 12/10/98 15:29 NO.672 D01 Pittman Construction, Inc. Gary Pittrnan • 5511 Dura@ry Lane Fort worth.Texas 76119 ;, 817-572-6864 Fax 817-572-1320 Post-it'Fax Note 7671 •d ■ ode � Duty 15, 1998 If!" ��►� �Re:Bicentamial Para: co. hiettype gone. Pleas e AT3I�Tr1mC.Ooplr Fa" %,7 + As per our discussion the new pricing for Storm drains will be $181,223.50. Since out original bid on this job we have had a 810.00 per cubic yard increase in the price of cook.We did the bid at S52.00 a cubic yard and currently it will be 862.00 a cubic yard guaranteed until December 1,1998. Currently we have 120C•cubic 1 °s in the project for a increase of$12,000.00. If you have any questions please feel free to phone me. Thank You, iboulr A45W— Gary Pittman Z8 39dd r tWWll d 6ET6EI9lI8 S13=8Z 8661/17e C8 � sAi 3 A►""" City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 15, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for water well drilling at Bob Jones Park City staff, with Cheatham and Associates, are evaluating the necessary requirements for a water well at Bob Jones Park. Although the existing pond has demonstrated the ability to retain water, the function of this pond has been to maintain fish life and supply the turf irrigation system. Athestically, the pavilion has been designed to accept a constant water level. These factors, in addition to water evaporation losses during mid to late summer, months has established a need for a quality water well. All water wells known to exist are being considered for use. Those wells thought to have potential are not meeting prior expectations. Therefore, upon the conclusion of our evaluation, we request authorization to bid for a water well near the existing pond. Attached is a brief review of the considerations from Cheatham and Associates. If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 824. BH Attachment: Memorandum status from Cheatham Associates Jul-15-98 03:36P P.O2 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES MEMORANDUM TO: Ben Henry DATE: 7/15/98 FROM: Ron King SUBJECT: Bob Joncs Park- Irrigation Supply Well Job No. 001-938 As you requested, we have investigated the construction of an irrigation supply well near the existing pond at Bob Jones Park. According to information from your irrigation contractor and from our calculations, you will need to have a minimum production rate of 75 gpm from the well to keep the soccer fields watered at 1.5 inches per week. Since this rate would require continuous 24-hour operation of the well, we recommend that the target production rate be 100 gpm, so that the wells would not have to be run constantly. This 100 gpm rate would also provide buffer against variations in yield from the aquifer, but would not cost significantly more than the 75 gpm rate. There are two aquifers in this area that have water of irrigation quality - the Woodbine formation Lay at about 60 feet to 100 feet deep, and the Paluxy formation at about 800 to 900 feet deep. Since the Woodbine is more shallow, the yield per well would be smaller, and at least 4 wells would have to be constructed. The cones of influence for the wells would require that they be spread out over several hundred feet. The Woodbine also has significant iron content. which, while not causing any plant life health threats, could discolor any pavement or structures it contacts. The Woodbine is also subject to aquifer depletion at times of extreme drought. One well in the deeper Paluxy formation would be sufficient for the target yield rate, and the water from this well would not have any iron problems_ Likewise, the Paluxy aquifer is not subject to the same problems for recharge during a drought period as the Woodbine. We recommend that one well be constructed in the Paluxy formation so that maintenance could be limited to one well, discharge piping could be minimized, and iron discoloration could be eliminated. Since the well would be in an open park, it should have some protection against vandalism. A 6- or 8-foot privacy fence with a double gate for vehicle access should provide sufficient protection from vandalism, while allowing free access to the well for maintenance purposes. A masonry-type building could be assembled over the well, but it must be completely disassembled during well pump maintenance to allow the maintenance vehicle direct access to the well. In either case, the well will have a control panel (manual on/off) in a stainless steel lockable enclosure. We are currently developing cost estimates for the well,discharge piping, and protection structure. I.woRl) )UTHLAK\93a1WELL MEM.•pd ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 16Ol E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200•Arlington,Texas 76011 817/548-0696• Metro 265-8836•Fax 817/265-8532 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM Cr" July 17, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Sign Variance Appeal for Woodland Heights Addition, 1721-1725 East Southlake Boulevard. Staff is requesting that this item be tabled to the next City Council Meeting on August 4, 1998. We have not received a revised submittal from Ms. Joan Monahan, owner of Bootstrap Investment, at this time. 66, BC/bls 1 L 5P-1 City of South lake,Texas STAFF REPORT July 17, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-043 PROJECT: Resolution No. 98-49/Specific Use Permit/ Wal-Mart- outside storage of plants or other greenery STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 City Manager Curtis E. Hawk, in speaking with Wal-Mart Manager Aaron Carter, has learned that Wal-Mart wishes to withdraw this request and will be sending a letter to the City to this effect. L:\COMDE V\W P-FILES\MEMO\98CAS ES\98-043 SU.TB L `7A City of Southlake,Texas (liow STAFF REPORT July 17, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-054 PROJECT: Site Plan /Southlake Crossing Animal Clinic STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for Southlake Crossing Animal Clinic on property legally described as being a portion of Lot 4, J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1253, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 0.528 acres. LOCATION: North side of West Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709)approximately 350' west of Randol Mill Avenue. OWNER/APPLICANT: Southlake Crossing Animal Clinic CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District L., LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and 100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Eight(8) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: June 4, 1998; Approved(6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 29, 1998. COUNCIL ACTION: June 16, 1998;Approved(7-0)at the applicant's request to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the July 7, 1998, City Council meeting. July 7, 1998; Approved(6-0) at the applicant's request to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the July 21, 1998, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1,dated May 29, 1998,with the exception of those in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated July 17, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-054SP.WPD 6- 1 . . . I , • I 1 _ L._j(..„., r___i __ J\/ / K. . 1 1 • ' ' • ' .._,:cROSS !d i ' , / I .. I 1 I ! .! . , 1-1:, i l',...) / / I 1 1 : ! CFFCIE C'r - 7,1 (..5., l'/ -........i - \t. .,_,:-......] _........c---- -, / - / \ t.-- / t \ ‘t,...._, , / \ ./ ' I / ----...: - WEAL- , • I I ' i I !I____J I-1 i < 1I 5 —1--H I !I •, l ./ '' !:::: tifett I .L...1. 1 .•• • 1 i 1 . 1 I r 1 ____.,.__. gi i M I 1 I, 1.....': 1 (,--- i itairtiLiftV ..'41 ' 1 n L..... .,•. .. '....1 1 '''''''''''' ....... ..1 ; i __II.1 .2 , L-r.T....." -'>.. .......... .'. .,;S' I, .i' 1 • . ... ... ...........- 4 . ......:3:?. ...\ '%, a.. 7-1.4 • . : j i_."-L....2-"."--'n \ . • ' ''''...,.... • -----'7--- ---. 1 S 1 I 1 ' NI ; i . , I 1,...... , \ \ ‘..."‘,.."••••=r1Z-4.--::—,' -_, 7-- • •--,1,----L7=I 1 ,. 1345k-7 _.....,v• 1,,, I t • r\ L-72 /- -V--i -1-1 f_..:__. I . • v -1 ! , 1 cHs6B1 1 \ .. ,1_..11,..,;,\...J__) E17-71,t it „---T--t.--I-S-- - _: 11: • I --->i•-- , 1 „ ,; 1 '' I-1 , i t • \ I i• I I I I 4. I ! , .r-- t, a..___L_ • S--- --_____L-. ;• I ; I , 'I I I I , i , , ,--,, k • •- • \ ., 1 . ' '-• , I , ... L V/t', ,...,.," IA; 1 ' : $31.3.4c j : : • ! r ! I 1 vcr tro,x9at I I . ! ! 1i 1 . ; ' ... -...... - ...-.--•••••••11 \ ' . ,------, i-------!, l!r----"--1.._______1 CARF , 1 I 'I \ 1 • it / \, 0110* As" 17 SCK --.1 II I :,-L----ilr___1 , 1 \ t .§‘ 7 .r_-____: ils ,.--------------1 f \.---L.--J-----7 4.46•24-:7 ./ , . les-or.....„--- f-51 t'' . ' IV ';--$0\SC' .'•.Cf-. !7--*.____!• !'=__--1. •I hi . .-......-.....1 ., . 1 ,M7-1, .----1 , ./, .,.L! 1 \ "in ' Hil •\ S -- P1/4CSE:'1------: \ , I :._ Iiii \ . \ \ 1 .., js._2____:"• , i-j ./ \ I \ 1 i . , \\ \ I1., 'Z''' ! I _ _______< g(_ ' ; , --- . t.;--1, '', , I ). C431;t1i1 ' z: -, • •' I —CO14 '--1 R; 1 n' • ..---.. z, , \ I 4117g 1 , PO --i! .--. 0 ___ A_________I '_------1, 10 ; I; 1 1 I i. . ' ,t i !...I., „.! ,I_____ I 11....._, . .1.64.4---fiEENNC7 ____7 I • .r " ' ! I 1 1 1 '' ' ' Ht;ji,- ---.--:. ESI II* !• - r---,- . • --- ; . ,____ /l'i II ppl*---; ...----!---L___ L. • . , • , . , _ ,,L____, , . • .., L_, il 1 , , k , , ,, f,„,,,j,„______,_ ,,r -- \- ,1-r___ TRACT MAPElEMWEARY 7 .1-\• ,, k •%Ata‘c2.st• 2- ;, 436-r 0...m.- --------\ SCHC/CL r-in-` !1 j I i J ; 24 '\ 22 li f 'IIAsa y� I _ 23 3 Y II. • ' 4 1 I , 5 I . ` ' i COMMON PRP. i / TR 4 13 i aIL1.0 AC fE DPr' 7�7iy A _,J....._-- .,___ I E 5 Ilt1 a0 a r R \o\ . • 2 yy 6A ri 68 6 I TR 1.4752 Ait. , 3 w I CQR�E \OS0 D . o •_ A 3 cm 1.605 0 a ' 7 x i So _ 1 • .4 . 909S 4 47. cL� .07 1 J. MARTIN L E . -0 n NI JG Q r� 1.056 titismeSTONEBRIDGE MONTICELLO 1 4 —DVI iNO C 3 TR.2D 4.3 A I ' �.646A` I = _ I 2R n ` I "S-P-2" ��y �� I .692 A $ 5.552 r i -• ! 2.6 • UT� rN; G ' SOUTHLAKE STONEBRIDGE ` ��ti'' I O T r 56� S S l U HLAKE •I 3R1 v „gE 11\ 21)7. ► $07 .722 O i �{ ,0 .61 , J.V. �. r ► , 94y 9 yr 5 r 4 9�2 1 . S R.,- 1 '��4 . �,a , 62.560 A O2c TR 201 �P'�� �`\���9'9 • C-2 y� 1 A S S , I - / ti '' \/, , ,, TR . 13 2A3 � I ® S \55 , • I • TR 2A1 • C_2 3.63 AC �P. 23 108 ; > ® \ I .002 C .. 5R 1 01 0 METZER DAIRIES 1 0 I ;•,I - ADJACENT OWNERS 505 T------"-------"---- taA 2AND ZONING I -76"3 ' \� l_( c— f 1 ` LK.-tY.-III UC.L M7l "_ I p F i .e j r 3u16 ar°r 3�D Ltr s mn Z 79 J4 la ,. 00 �o� 1 �INI1�1bWIMd 9HI� �� U_ 2 . lilt 2 i 11 4(We Ill �� ass I lit ii- 10 It al 11-i; L "s I Z 4/ � lif � iii Q ' i ' A ir 11 .. \44.111, ii r. iL r * ,, ,‘\,, ,,,,\‘,,,,<.\.\\41/41r, gm w, , s•\ .,.,‘,. .',.,„ \ -- ,-. . -\k 0 (``\ \ _ �:11 ° `i\ t ► t _$ g . o W, A . , iell l Z.o � tx ,s ,Ti Aa. )- 0 g J ;ill rr-; o VQ > x` CC a 21 " Fyyp ( Oi r re re tp0 1 i0 2u po _ .0t 9 Z 1•1 `• E9jy2� 51�44y:1Fle"O! it If vv . tip —I y y 4 P P 4 O_ . IZ; 11 plp L w11<oa.-1 W1iraI 0 t ° f '� C •�Yt3'►�t Q ish zN4,14Y�oo" Q g 7'YYt Q 11 A/ iz 4sa i> e 0Q l tjil J1 i i"3/i100� i1 2i Z001��_1 W - _ _1 (Y V.°_ 16 V City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No.: ZA 98-054 Review No: Two Date of Review: 7/17/98 Project Name: Site Plan-Southlake Crossing Animal Clinic- West Southlake Boulevard.#1709. Southlake. Texas APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Mark Cox Blake Architects 1039 Burney Lane 1202 S. White Chapel Road. Suite A Southlake. Texas 76092 Southlake.Texas 76092 Phone : (817)431-9591 Phone : (817)488-9397 Fax : (817)431-6972 Attn. Mark Cox Fax : (817)251- 3205 Attn. Skip Blake CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/13/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 862. * No review of the driveways is provided with this concept plan. The following conditions exempt the driveway from current requirements: This site proposes utilizing the existing curb cut. The proposed use of the driveway is not projected to increase by twenty percent or more the actual or proposed daily design hour volume. 1. Mechanical units, satellite dishes, etc. must be screened of view from Adjacent R.O.W. and/or residentially zoned or designated properties. This includes equipment on the roof, on the ground or otherwise. Indicate the type and height of screening proposed for mechanical units. 2. Revise the dumspter location on the grading plan to match the site plan. P&Z ACTION: June 4, 1998; Approved(6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 29, 1998. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * A common access easement will be required on the adjacent to the east property line, along the concrete drive and stubbing into the west property at the time of platting and prior to issuance of a building permit. The easement shall encompass the entire width of the planned drive plus an additional with of 1 foot on both sides of the drive. -1g-6" r City of Southlake,Texas * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat Revision must be processed for all of Lot 4,J. G. Allen,No. 18,and filed in the County Plat Records. Additionally, C a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fees, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Mark Cox VIA FAX ABOVE Blake Architects VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98054SP2.WPD C C i loamy it till as tYto 1ws1 Ail) 9msw f fl limy MS 1 I; = o2lrIVi e•r‘ MLIiI r- d iIitl.ii.i4 iilt!. ;A!I. A,1m1. :;21-..4C Ii.1-5-C!.1 11,I.(N1, 8 " ,r = ;' •II' ' A.K N6ti.N- .,z i;1i1..4I6i/,..di4wl i 1-*Ii-. lIIIf • T 5 .fib' ' :�;f�?;��`N, o i� .. ieIPi , .s . ! .r 1 i y r I .. .., -..... \------- ' I gt / * " / *y 1) y�A/ \ 4 141 [�� t r b is :: r s i s\y\�I i'. I-II n•YE V 4 !w••S ! la L u •ir- I� 1t \� 111 — •^wwni!!aw ?il }Qw ww OF QF p� till � ww i1 ht 1 s go % Q iw n `� W F •w J��j' i„ 2.1ill!psp NE I" e o /--s 2 Q wwiww.1ww00 giF \ 1 t : i g4' a } = =00i31aNy • ; .� 4 ' lyiami! } Ii<1g pg/gg g111 .lilir l\ ` � !�_ '/ " wA. -___--a,,_ ,`.,c 4. ;11 1111111/111 1 / ofo 11 a P,11 7 Ol4 _ ._ - —_______ —� p .` — � - _ r 2_ - ini s I ft ri §4w )** il II 71 Fr \ 41111) I I i d)I / ?• t lr wno tILI and to• w I al i V ,, 1- r ft i a r�� �� .s'a - 1 .: 1 la 28,_a tr - -- i lit 1- : `1 L:i 's ill 19 il e ii 11 ` Q i„' t$' o Yat e aw� I o1211/11 o J.1o.111 • i Q + Q !IIyioy}I I e 't 3I ` "'\ , I Q o i" Y Y� }iar:WTp�i� 03 �L` I. W �t Q 0 n io �`�iggr lei t a\.\ ( to a 1 Ma: Mil .) !R{'�M'• • i�0�t frR1t 7M/NYI� '//��{���y(/� �ry�►�J 1/y��ry/1 1/y/��y"/� (���//y�� - e C e $ I wr v t I .)M 1/. 1111 +111/IO �1qA• � . . ice`jg +a m .n.�a........ t 3 •G .I (i tutU c t d _ p.! , tt 1. 1 isAis ; _-__. . D. WI,' 'yt,,,,tt''' '''''Al i h AqPill f IL ;i � ( 8 ScT_IaAtz ' it •- 8 —I �; ( Q 1 • lit 1h i it` 61111;!..ffilphlE' lioi r - __ � - i :t4114t11111; $.leg iii I .r - �+b -` - oi ••eo••••,I '� . r t : � � a / ,,,,,,,,QA\, t , : '77'.. i Wis. ,.. 21 poillt„.o . W ter. 1 A ! 11 IU z 41 ` I II IL • '''' ' \ Itil 1 ' 41 C, A41 1 i1 I 0 r V. �8-8 • s LK$-MP-n• •• Mk Mal V nos Z 1 f$ is ' i i s M iii .....q.,..n., .81011/1100.11391111E 1 9INIl'�1�WIMd 9NI ?S d , i - orwomparsrurauserersno j E 4 m - ni ail ill iii i Ifi 14 Ill Fr : i-.....,, -___-_,-,_ . 4), , ,,,„„ ,,_____,, . .,„ , ..... , a, j ..,,,,..,...„,„V . . Its 0 w1� J.h2! 1 i I ‘-vi' ,:..31 .F..: €.. 8.1 Ek. 1.7.7 iFil i -- `- t .f: �} <: 1 ®i. ll ` II ir _ j[...- 1' L. . ,_.- -'-'1 FEES Iv 4 1 1 ..r. ,_:,..,,.., :-- _4 1 :: ® ii , I _._ ) pi -4__ „*. , :::: PC I C _ I i. H?1,34 3P-* .,N i i I s _ II 1 i I I 1 'ill ...._,_ i '4.1 ' 7" z I :Kiwi mill cie, /6-9 . City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-CC, Revisions to the Corridor Overlay Zone Regulations and Addition of Residential Adjacency and Roof Design Standards Attached is Draft 7 of Ordinance No. 480-CC dated 7/17/98 which reflects some of the Commission's recommendations made on June 18, 1998 and the City Attorney's recommendations made on June 29, 1998. Included is a redline/strikeout version and a"clean" version. The Commission recommended the following changes: add a definition for"footprint" in Section 1; add the word"footprint"after the words"6,000 square feet" in Section 3.1 (B); and stipulate that the terms of this ordinance shall apply for all submittals following the effective date of this ordinance. I feel that the term footprint is an industry standard which should not need defining. I am still working with the attorney's office on the appropriate wording and location within the ordinance to address the effective date of this ordinance. The City Attorney recommended the following changes: look at the enforcement impact of the definition of"visible" as currently proposed and reformat the adjacency provisions. They suggested relocating all references to residential adjacency to the existing section within the Corridor Overlay Zone entitled, "II . Residential Adjacency Standards." Following is a brief summary of each of the sections of the proposed ordinance. Previous Section 1: This definition section was deleted and was incorporated into the Residential Adjacency Standards section as recommended by the City Attorney. The new definitions will now apply only to that section of the ordinance, rather than the entire ordinance. Section 2 as previously drafted is no longer applicable. The City Attorney feels that the Corridor Overlay Zone (and Village Center) regulations should be totally segregated from any Residential Adjacency Standards. Section 1 (New): Adds a cross-reference to the new residential adjacency standards in the opening paragraph of"General Development Standards," of the Corridor Overlay Zone. This reference is included so that the additional overlay requirements are not overlooked by the applicant. Section 2: Revises the Corridor Overlay Zone by revising certain sections and by adding a new subparagraph in that section entitled, "Roof Design Standards." Following are the recommended changes to referenced subparagraphs: (a) Masonry Requirements: In response to Mayor Stacy's and others' concern about the appearance of the"backs"of buildings, a provision was added which requires that the masonry standards set forth in the Corridor Overlay Zone shall apply to facades which are also visible from a roadway designated as having a ROW of 60' or greater. Note that all references to the 400'residential adjacency requirement have been deleted since it will be addressed in Section 4 of this ordinance City of Southlake,Texas • - Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager July 17, 1998 Page Two (which amends Section 43, III, Residential Adjacency Standards, within the overlay zones section of the zoning ordinance). The City Attorney also recommended that the language be reworded regarding the limits of the Chief Building Official's authority with respect to approving alternative synthetic products. The Chief Building Official will have the final say regarding the strength and durability of an alternative when compared to stucco as applied with the method described in the ordinance. This subparagraph also establishes a limit on the amount of synthetic products(e.g., EIFS, Hardy plank, etc.)that can be used for a building's exterior finish. The recommended limit was 80%, exclusive of all windows, doors, and glass construction materials. John Drews requested that a "grandfather"provision be added for projects currently under construction (where certain materials were approved prior to the adoption of the new standards). (b) Roof Design Standards: This new subparagraph recommends that any structure having a footprint of 6,000 s.f or less be required to have a pitched roof. Those structures having a footprint greater than 6,000 s.f may be constructed with either a pitched, parapet, or mansard roof (which is enclosed on all sides). Lapped-seamed metal roofs, built up roofs, and flat, membrane- type roofs are prohibited. Standing seam metal roofs are now required to be constructed of a "factory-treated, non-metallic, matte finish." (c) Mechanical Equipment Screening: The revisions to this subparagraph attempts to provide additional options of rooftop screening while attempting to prevent enclosing"a box within a box" (i.e., mechanical units within enclosures)and still preventing the object from being visible from the street, etc. During discussions of rooftop screening, certain construction issues were raised: 1) proper air exchange of mechanicals and 2)weight of masonry materials for rooftop architectural features. To address these concerns, the following changes have been made: 1) if the rooftop architectural feature is utilized, then the mechanicals have to be"visually screened" rather than "totally enclosed"and 2)materials used in the construction of such a feature should be integral to the building's design. Also, a new provision was added that now requires that all rooftop mechanicals or architectural features be shown on the required elevations at the time of site plan approval. Note that there is currently no definition of visible for the Corridor Overlay regulations, nor is one being proposed. The proposed definition of visible applies only to residential adjacencies. Note again that all references to the 400' residential adjacency requirement have been deleted since it will be addressed in Section 4 of this ordinance (which amends Section 43,III, Residential Adjacency Standards, within the overlay zones section of the zoning ordinance). (d) Facade Articulation:No technical requirements have been changed within this provision. Note again that all references to the 400'residential adjacency requirement have been deleted since it will be addressed in Section 4 of this ordinance (which amends Section 43, III, Residential Adjacency Standards, within the overlay zones section of the zoning ordinance). ?C-2-- City of Southlake,Texas a, Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager (ioe,. July 17, 1998 Page Three (h) Height: No technical requirements have been changed within this provision. Note again that all references to the 400' residential adjacency requirement has been deleted since it will be addressed in Section 4 of this ordinance (which amends Section 43, III, Residential Adjacency Standards, within the overlay zones section of the zoning ordinance). Section 3: This section deletes any reference of residential adjacency from the Corridor Overlay sections addressing loading and service areas and trash and recycling receptacles. These requirements were added to "III, Residential Adjacency Standards." Section 4: This section revises the existing"III, Residential adjacency Standards" currently in the Overlay Zone section of the ordinance.Upon the advice of the City Attorney, this section was revised to include all references to adjacency requirements previously shown in the corridor regulations as well as any new requirements being proposed by this ordinance amendment. It establishes the purpose and intent in adopting such standards, establishes definitions applicable to only this section (as noted previously), establishes that the applicant provide a concept plan and/or site plan as is now required in the Corridor Overlay Zone and adds the provision that a line-of-sight exhibit be provide to address the issue of visibility. Note that the definition of under construction was deleted because the term was not used in the existing draft. (hime The subparagraphs"a- k" which follow incorporate into the section the standards which were originally rP to be included into each non-single family residential district. Note that in each case, the specific requirement; such as, masonry, roof standards, etc., has been "lifted" from the Corridor Overlay requirement and modified to "fit" the residential adjacency circumstances rather that roadway adjacency situations. No substantive changes have been made in the transfer of requirements. Loading and service area requirements have now been added to the ordinance due to the reference of the placement of a screening wall in these areas when adjacent to residential property. Note the change in subparagraph "h" where I combined the 4:1 slope/setback requirement and the Location (i.e., yard) requirement under one heading. I have also added non-single family residential to the 4:1 requirement so that all adjacency requirements consistently apply to non-single family residential districts. No changes were made to spill-over lighting or noise requirements. Subparagraph"k" again references the variance section in the Corridor Overlay Zone for consistency. Recall earlier concerns expressed by some developers regarding the 50' setback of trash and recycling receptacles from single family residential property lines. Section 5: Additional Development Regulations for Non-Single Familx Residential Buildings or Uses: This new subsection references the additional development regulations for non-single family residential uses or buildings developing within 400' of single family residential property. All the noted zoning districts within the zoning ordinance will be amended to add the noted statement and the reference to see Section 43, III. "Residential Adjacency Standards," for additional requirements. Note that I struck out non single family residential from the section title because the subsection will appear only in non-single family residential zoning districts. ../C•"2 City of Southlake,Texas - Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager July 17, 1998 Page Four Section 6: Variances: Everyone involved in the work group felt that Council should be able to grant variances to provisions within the corridor overly zone. John Drews cited that sometimes the literal requirements of the ordinance will not work architecturally and without some relief the building "may well end up being incredibly unattractive. " The only recommended change to this section was to add a provision whereby an owner or applicant could request a variance to the number of required parking spaces. Note that the Council would be limited to granting a variance to no more than plus-or-minus ("+/-') 10% of the required number of parking spaces and could only do so upon the request of either the owner or the applicant. Sections 7 - 13: Standard ordinance boilerplate: No changes have been made to these sections. Should you have questions regarding the ordinance amendment, please call me at 481-5581, extension 743. KPG enc Draft No. 7 of Ordinance No. 480-CC dated July 17, 1998 (redline/strike-out& clean versions) L - - ORDINANCE NO. 480-CC 1111.1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS 4 AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE 5 OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, REVOMIgg 6 CORRIO0*§4.04*.AWIRMaiktIONtaiREATING 7 RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY DEVELOPMENT 8 REGULATIONS FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 9 DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED (400) FEET 10 OF PROPERTIES ZONED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 11 OR DESIGNATED LOW OR MEDIUM DENSITY 12 RESIDENTIAL ON THE LAND USE PLAN; PROVIDING 13 THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF 14 ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY 15 CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS 16 HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING 17 ' FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING 18 FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND 19 •PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 20 21 WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, is a home rule city acting under its charter 22 adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and (11;e's WHEREAS,the City of Southlake has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, 26 'as the zoning ordinance of the city; and 27 28 WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has historically developed as a residential community 29 which is particularly suited for the development of a quality residential lifestyle which is separated 30 from non-single family residential developments which might adversely impact said residential 31 neighborhoods; and 32 33 WHEREAS, several existing and planned residential neighborhoods are located adjacent to 34 properties which are developing or will be developed for business and commercial use; and 35 36 WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Southlake recognizes the vital importance of 37 residential neighborhoods and the need to preserve and protect residential neighborhoods from the 38 potential adverse effects of adjoining non-single family residential uses; and 39 40 WHEREAS,the city council further recognizes that certain areas of the city would not be 41 appropriate for non-single family residential development unless special development restrictions are 42 placed on such areas; and 43 44 A4180.CC7.WPD Draft No.7,Datrd July 17,1998 Page I • 1- • - - WHEREAS,the city council desires to protect and enhance the attractiveness of the city to visitors; to promote and stimulate the economy; to ensure the harmonious, orderly and efficient growth and development of the city; to preserve property and property values; and to maintain a 4 generally harmonious outward appearance of both single family residential and non-single family 5 residential structures which are compatible and complementary; and 6 7 WHEREAS, the city council desires to adopt this ordinance for the purpose of preserving 8 and protecting the quality of residential life of existing and future residential neighborhoods by 9 adopting reasonable regulations that will promote non-single family residential development that is 10 compatible and complementary with adjoining single family residential properties. 11 12 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 13 OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: 14 15 SEA 16 - - - 17 " 18 • 19 the fullo*ing new definitions the1dtu. 20 1 iSeSbSFv�^7EaF a:. R&tPo e3'�0a^h�4°i:94$C:�4853:d86R1_ aizSeLa9eyp^:;;;;>:,st:;. .q as.�: R .d;:ai �s: w.>a -�;:-e 22 '• .......:..:::...... (5., 5 is :;:;}:};:;:+;:}}:':?jii:;{iiiiiiiii:::ii riiii:i:iiiiiiF�ii�i :i?{:yjji}iiiisi::i"4::i:>'::•isii:}ii:if•"Y'•'.'i>�':'r'r'ri:.�iii?i}ii?i::i 26 :;::;brs - 27 29 y ;: r..:•::}::::::.:P: :;::•:r::•i:;-in Tso r : <: :: :i::::>::: 30 31 thefitint ...................... 32 ::�"ii::i::::i::i:;:::i::r'�:i::ii:::i:``x:'•'::i:`'ii::::'v.'•'i:`'r:::%::::::::::::::i::::::::ii::3:::F�'i::-`.:: ::::v::::::::::;:::":::�"i: :ii::i::".:i.:::::r:%':'�K:':;::i:::::::.:: 33 34 ::::::::...a.i;.•:r.•:•::::::{;:ji:ii::S':,•ji:S:%v:.•.•N:ry:,.•:::•:-:i:. :r.•:f-�.`:�:.:;.}-:::.:::.iiY:ir'•!i?Y i,.:Y,.r{. .:..Mf..: 35 36 37 38 39 SECTION 2 i. 40 41 Section 43.9.c., "General Development Standards", of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is 42 hereby amended by revising the initial paragraph thereof to read as follows: "c. General Development Standards- The following standards shall apply to all non-single family residential development in the Corridor Overlay Zone and 45 the Village Center unless noted otherwise. i7 `'i;.;..;:;�;:�.:;.�;;.':.°;..: `;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,;;; ;;;,:;:::.;..;:.;;:.;.:: AW80-CC7.WPD Drff No.7,Doted July 17,1998 Page 2 C-(o • 1 - V r' d' :F./ •X:f.(be • ++J,paN•:.!/' _.-�,,s•,+,{y<:.•,• r>y,:;snox.•x :, •+,•":`i..�,.;;.}v,?:• :s;,.,::�,r;,.,; rr,.• ;w I • • • -::::.�:.::::::::..:v:{.:}:::::;.v....•v:.:•.m.v:.•:.;�:.;:........:::. /..'•.•. ... :r.v:f?.:;v.•:,:•`.:•:;y}:r.::.,: r:..:.:r.:Wi:.::.r,:,.:.;... �,•:,.:v::N ' ' �:....n..,•�.':..:t.':`•'....hfi::r....:}..3y}'•: : �.y t;.'i y4t�r'�c:r:4 :x wx Nvx^ 4rr?r :v � �xry� ll IL0� ? 5 .:f:::i:�1}:5i;:'f•r:;�:_ii: •v:�:;::M�:.::7# 6 7 SECTION 3 Z. 8 9 Section 43.9.c.1, paragraphs(a), (b), (c), (d), and(h)are hereby amended or added to read 10 as follows and existing paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) shall be relettered to (c), (d), (e), (f), 11 (g), and (h)respectively: 12 13 "1. Architectural Standards: 14 15 • (a) MasonryRequirements: ' t it s �'pp'p y> :facades which 16 are visible from : 17rSH 114, Carroll Avenue between SH 114 and FM 1709, FM 18 1709, FM 1938`»::>::::>_,::: ::;:>:::: :>>::»>::»::»::-:>:»>: :::>:«:::><:::::>::::> 19 csi€ >'' 4xou € t€ 20 and/v, fitful t„opci ty within 400' Luilc.h aaik nt .............................. ::"»: ii::X f::;i-.;n;__: }y{{::ry:4:?:v'Sr::,}'-•rrr:::nr:•:••r:i.}:i{{•} :.} .rr•:???•rY}r:'ir:4:?? } {.:::::n .. : : : :: ltWitt ie>:.}:• p:> a r ?:. 24 b! '> summegtOfgpx,pgim.ateirKantall buildings must l 25 meet the masonry requirements as set out in Ordinance No 557, as 26 amended. However, such masonry requirements shall exclude the use 27 of cement, concrete tilt wall and other masonry materials of similar 28 characteristics. In addition,the use of standard concrete block shall be 29 limited to 10% of any facade visible from adjacent public ROW. 30 31 Stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step 32 process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by 33 other processes producing comparable stucco finish with equal or 34 greater strength and durability specifications. ' `` 35 36 glianditkomiothvolfiteoftiakoht :+•Iv!•i::?.x?.r.......t,. txrr:'.: .:.,....:�•;:r:>:x.,..,?:.:?:?.trx,:::::.:.x:..;.::::.:::::,",r::4:4--r::�::>:::>:: 37 .: / .x.•::.::41%� �- ` ';,Gi:%' ,;:!,GC.'•Yr:✓,:?;i'.:::v. 't`:G::. 'f..., .,t. 38 fi.:l /.Ii.:.,//' _ o b fjii x�;i�%f'• ��•::• �µfii..•: .�.Xr;;+.�• 3�g�' ,+,4„�.I ,ryr v..t?.x..v .;?f„ „�t f;..:?..�f?�.:y.:::: 39 ,: .E,f { '• 40 :•F:�I/l r'�5:3:�Y,.r%Y ?,"••'y¢.!,n? •}I`:''2�:/:i •'l:,i:nS:::....t'•�.j.•'!ft?•. r.� :�!.?+',s�C:tSYI.I,+�';•5'•:;•^.°:;_:`+' sfY,.,^:t,{'7'•,,�9Yf.�ts•.�:::j•'<!C::r'•:�i 41 oce 42 :::::.r:.}}}r;;::r:.:.:I.,t:.:;:;,:::. : —..:......�.i .II't.;.tt.:.r:.r:.r}:::4:?.}:?:>:.v?::::::.v::::.r}:.:..:::?+:r:.r:::.>r:.}::?.�'.4}r::.??;???:::.::::.r::.�:::::: ::..•:r::..: ,�,x ,.::::::is-:: ..::+•:::•::::•:::'i/:::.:}:.. :. ??•:::.I.;n�:-:::i:::}':.�, '-•rr::::?%-:--: r:?ts••+t%/'icf Ifl;,?:::. .?o.',t:.., .;.;'Y v ,r,I ;:::.'/••,'k" 'a::�'f�::r::. .i}>:: .r..: !. y r'•%�%+;I•�?%?;•',•�. •:•'•i::,Y%�::};:'^.:::"ft?:.,I„::f:?::;'•:ry?:: +.•rt;:•-s•: •t1+.!:%.�:r:;:r:;r:::r::.;•..: 45 A.\480•CC7.WPD Drq?No.7,Data July 17,1998 Page -� C-i - - _ . -- . . • • • • - - - _•,, ...-._ , . • • i, 1- -- - uswir: 1.::iet,....iimoradaiximaNgdoreatiow,rociton,,:. %Ng' 4 .4todamb:At swigsabgttgoefxx9....., meabanical 5 ,.i....;;.z* :.„:,„._.„:i.*::.E;E:::::::::,:mt2 .:iii .g... aE::.:K:K:MW:K::BiVkkl:K§.0;Ngediki::::::::i:i:::ii:gi:il:W:i:::i:Wi4 WpAtping014:K§:MtneKi:i:itUgUrtelL::: alleUllariiieriiiiinurgieriiiiMOIViliati 6 ottuotuntkwiaditeroiese0,. *awsvagtgOooAuateIgietm, atm ...,::•:01,i,i,,,:,,:,;,,,,E. , .„1.:,-,:,,,:„:::,i,::,.:„,m.m::::,i,i ,,,,::::,,,:::,E,.:,,,,::.::,,i„,::,,:,,:mi::::,:::-i,::::,:,giii3:i:::::,...:,i,:::::::::::::::x:,,E,K:::i:i.,,,i,,,,i,,,:::i:Kg,,,,§:K:,,,,, f091Pfigit Obilit begolonggettwothapitibotttiotioniosowitotorts ::.:, ::::•:•••::::::::::::•:•:...,,P.K.:•:•i:::::.,.:f.::i-i•it:::•:•:::;:i::,:•i•K•x.i.:,:•:;,-:-:---i,"ki,,i;*;;;:•E:E;:i::%,:.43.:::::;:;;•:•:•ii;: i:ii•i•-i:E:i:i::•i•E;::::•i:fi:i•i;:i:E.f7:,Z•ii:i:':;:•ieisXiX 8 AggiltitltogVin.c:Itifib,::1#01:601#1tIMON01003110*Ofitivigiatibe 9 iiiiiffitifili. . eitherpitched,fili 41: itH•••:::oilIii:filiiiiiia , 'ilia- iiiiiiiimiriligniaggiiiiivr". sititafigrimmi,-::-.*-R-piii-;3-:::::::, 1 o ( . .. 00,, •:::• . "•., . •, •.,;•,,.i f. , • ii ----toillsirokfted •9ile::::::Ke:•*::imiiiiiim::.:i:...EIEJ:ial:•-imrs.m7-3Nr-m: i.c.,::, •-:AW.jrd;,W':-----:---"A-""•"-""": 11 ofkltorgcloty4e*-006%patingtiolgoinfitiggiftowii =id clad with ... :.„„:.....:,-....„„:„...„ 12 slate-likecomposition slate or a manmade product Metal shingles, 13 -•"--•-------- iii6Siitititilififitifiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit tiaitiiiiiiiiit bitittaiiiiiiiffilid .:ipai:,:s,: . . : :.: .::.:::i:iz:::i::::,:,:,:nr::::::::,:::::::::i.i.::::::...::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,3::::-:::::,::::::: 14 ft#RgpvIlwanoitypmr•op&Mitolts#:::::iivtiiii10:0V0:::1000fit:Plitti0 15 goweilitiliiiiiiiiiitiii 16 17 • (c) Mechanical Equipment Screening: All buildings must be designed such 18 that no mechanical equipment(HVAC, etc.)or satellite dishes shall be 19 visible from SH 114, Carroll Avenue between SH 114 and FM 1709, 20 FM 1709, and FM 1938 and adjacent ki0#011.1tOW and÷or-from 21 property 400' of a plogerty-fine--of-a-tract-zoned-residentiai-or 22 designated as low or medium density residential on the Land Use Plan. (1115'1 ...N. : :::i : : :i;E :•:;;Z:X:A:::ail property ''' . '".".. within::' 00 feet:i . :."''''''''''''''''''.:. nin- singleppbmgdothOingildp* This shall include equipment on the roof, on the ground or otherwise attached to the building or located 26 on the site. 1. 27 28 Niiitiiiihiiiitiiiliiiaiiiditgikgeietzotttiwiiattitio 29 iiiiiliIpisliiit: - accomplished:!,Iiiii . iiiiiiiiblitil constructiongititiV 30 roofmwsteinsigiitlesgrfttk:bviiiistibtxraggikigi(b)Mabavwibrig2Piaii 00.1hittositirgauto Jeratti61:15,0lliis):1110:11th,01.10::40..thoi0144020liiiii. 31 :-:: r :::.:i: :--,::::: ' :: 32 enSuoilhot OWN,c ;t ,,,$-Isinotivlswoptemtverfettotopobtioffialg .::::::::::-:- . .:::z:.""n:Q::.-- .••*-"rf:':*•.-..'.* .‘::"---••-•••••••• 33 Thwatiiocitortntkietijamitig.dwatteihankituitittlbilliiiiierb6 34 fitimaorcjitigairooliwoz,. a 35 36 Allrooftop EiiiiiiiiMSE iiiiiikiiiiiiit riiiiiiffirdii. littlitiiiifiliki fx,;,•:,;,•:,,,,..g.,:,,-;,,•;.5,,,,,::: : ,•:,;,;,;,ig,•,;,•:,•:,;,•:,:,•::-q:, : -.q.,:,..ag:...:::,:,:,:,..,:,:,:,:g::,:,:,::.,..,:,:,:,r:::,:,::.::,:,:,:,....,:,:,:,:,:g;,•:f.f.::,,.,:,-::::,.,,:::::,:i:,:::::,;00:::::::•::::::::::::::,•••••••*::::::::. 37 blioworon(hoggiutreOtoildimgeleatitifisittheftettif site plan 38 VPDX.fali 39 40 (d) Facade Articulation: On all non-single family residential buildings, all 41 facades which are visible from SH 114, Carroll Avenue between SH 42 114 and FM 1709, or FM 1709,wid/or we within 4Q0' uf a pi ulitt ty 43 line of a traa Loned-residvntial ui desibilated as luw or noxliuni 44 density residential n the Land Use Plan, ••`•: * Em* §::-•::Kw:-.itm...:-..e- ''' ''' -:•••••.ikci;:;•::.....0.:1::::::a:-.7::::::,:it*,, izi:::•:::,---77:: ..::,...:•:; :.-:.•s'".---4.- :::::.---i•':-... ---......,:t----,.:.-•- • -.--::••,-...- .:.. (..f f04.016#11*(t#NOlt the following horizontal and vertical articulation 47 must be met(see Exhibit 43-A for clarification). M480-CC7.WPD Draft No.7,Dated;July 17,1998 Page 4 1 i. Horizontal 'Articulation: No building facade shall extend greater than three(3)times the wall's height without having a minimum off-set of 15% of the wall's height, and such off- 4 set shall continue for a minimum distance equal to at least 5 25% of the maximum length of either adjacent plane. 6 7 ii. Vertical Articulation: No horizontal wall shall extend for a 8 distance greater than three (3) times the height of the wall 9 without changing height by a minimum of 15% of the wall's 10 height, and such height change shall continue for a minimum 11 distance equal to at least 25%of the maximum length of either 12 adjacent plane. 13 14 (h) Height: Same as in underlying zoning Buildings adjacent to o, 15 16 17 18 e. o,.,. ....sou e. ... .... .. # :'::' 19 ................. 20 21 i. Village Center: All properties which are located within the 22 Village Center shall be further limited in height to the (010; underlying zoning district or maximum elevation of 710 feet (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929), whichever is lower." 26 27 28 SECTION 4 3. 29 Sections 43.9.c.2(c), "Loading and Service Areas"and 43.9.c.2(d), "Trash Receptacles", 30 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is r hereby amended to read as follows: 31 "(c) Loading and Service Areas: Loading and service areas shall be 32 located at the side or rear of buildings. A minimum 10 foot solid 33 screening wall shall be required to screen views of loading docks and 34 loading spaces intended for tractor/semi-trailer delivery from any 35 public right-of-way. 36 37 38 This 10 foot wall must screen the entire loading dock or space. 39 Screening materials shall utilize similar masonrymaterials to the 40 front facade. The accommodation of adequate access for service 41 delivery trucks may be evaluated to determine the extent of screening (bir required 44 AW84CC7.WPD Drat No.7,Daunt July 17,1998 Page 5 1 C—q . - _ • • • - .• • 1- - ::::**r (d) Trash Receptacles • 141.1 ••i•••• • S. „. hog receptacles shall be 4 four sided with a gate and located outside bufferyards, and to the side 5 or rear of the principal building. They shall be screened by a minimum 6 eight foot (8') solid masonry screen and shall utilize similar masonry 7 materials to the principal structure." 8 9 10 SECTIONI115 11 12 Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by arkting-nevrsections-ft-76,-16-67f-776; 13 18.6, 19.4, 20.6, 21.6, 22.6, 23.6, 24.6, 25.6, 26.6, 27.6, 28.6, 29.6, 30.6, 31.4 coal 32.4 eudi 14 cpetivdy Vrewsmrstitiipragm,hs 15 4 read as followsi-and-brrentimlyering 16 the rcniaining stt,tions at,eordingly. 17 "III. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARDS 43.10 The following residential adjacency standards shall apply to all properties t sngTh family residential luildAngs or zres located within the Corridor 21 Overlay Zone,rtrid the Village Center, aria#10-8000VOMM:Weatifpreklitar 22 fogrOSAatiali 23 propertyw 24 25 These #anthrdc are • to the development••,.. •:- • applicable to 26 442141:14fiffPgte.ftgAg4OMPEKliittflot and thmeNntior iroverkePteMe(where 27 28 • ....................... ...................................................................................................................................any....er .. •:.•froitivit >tire, • 4.:*i•• • * ;.$ . : * • • 29 reqwrementi $r this the . ; • . onb tWe more stringent 30 requirements S104kaPPIN 3 1 32 4311 ptykttsgANtrmTEhm.,in::otdetrtowtimm -:iwameetseifitekotyof :•i• • , 33 residential,' •,."andbi an efbrt to • 3 4 ,••••••: 4::••.....:0,661arear 3 5 ititifigarovipirtie, has , ••• .•." - . 36 apProPnaterw 6 • 3 7 uses and . .umum 3 8 properties .:::9 e',= ":9 " : . / •9!-`. 1%. 39 (re Y.,Y.Y•ftl..::.:4*X:Y.•:**:::..4XY / siPt, 42 Ameo-cci.wpD Draft No.7,Dated July17,1998 Page 6 ir-tn Ar ..7v*r4":04tog2.17*"*...7' . . • . • . - : •sloe , „ residential st4iwe u*to the perty Irn of the single 4 •••••••• .wvaYgetitg .,...::OmotogmwismOMigOgnt4444CPAAPPOPRiagi::i 5 6 7 Newer y residential district = 8 uses orbuildings. 9 10 J'itched RooA roofsystem baying two or moreslopes,excluding sWb1e 11 itomobuOttmgmai 12 13 Single,'.::FtinuirRttadeNiatgr,:4044t:!:Fliglorktot Moot***drab* 14 thiiiiiikitiiiiiNglikattgitAISM#111010grdik§#116A 15 4,1tagnxitNYitok*:#440004440gSteftAtiotitotteamtxtonsitY 16 17 18 19 44:445NtiOniOriaii01ligitirtaiii:g4044Aliati:W.; 20 21 22 Ofskreet(i)whilt ttandingarthohightiovadevm.44raitkiniopepoisi line, 4. $10 0114.10.1WPAVOIXINVOlOPItigiddiardillistiliiiiiiiiiiiiii:044. 26 regulatios ettjbrtho:Arnei: . sumgoomogaistacti:Eaite 27 PIPAY4004:8104M04#11::****kokliggergillkittAidikt*P404 28 Sialtnt101tifitthis il4I414010*falftillbiltOtaii4100014 29 development egulatons sbafl be required to be submitted r any use or 30 building thitlieVelOpt*thiit::40Qteetotsingtoramilotitidwitiallapottiot 31 32 W* ats % *Thik} The tplanL shall be reviewed and •*-1:77 33 ••••:•-•• 34 •,••••4•!•••I 35 _•.. 36 37 nratielioronfOwitftiiAttthcades ofthe applictik,Uill(stssOgatt 44aairdokit4itykain • • 38 • . • o buildings must**Meet 39 the masonry requirements as set out in Ordinance No 557, as amended. 40 However, such masonry requirements shall exclude the use of cement, 41 concrete tilt wall and other masonry materials of similar characteristics. 42 In addition,the use of standard concrete block shall be limited to 10%of 43 any facade litt#10$ isible. fionradjacent public ROW. .44 L Stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by 47 other processes producing comparable stucco finish with equal or greater AM80-CC7.V1PD Draft No.7,Dated July 17,1998 Page 7 . . • - • • - . • 1 • stroVhan...dcoafrkthwichhuubiability specific ions. •4:...!...5,Usf...M".4":,..f.„.t.g„ 4 ,................................................................................................... 5 The use of synthetic ptoducts (e g RWS, Hardy plank;, or other 6 MatenittifffgradAY) ::.144$44441moiciffltiotWinOtegtaboY#104 7 ogititootattionkitilitto4j4to: building's exteiior finishes, 8 isasitvittkiadwysslitarkifittifitiwAAgetw"."0 9 • 10 Roof DesignR stwqurs shall meet the standards 11 12 CPP.APPMe*MOaligli.tYPM014N41P.TNIAPPT40410.40.PWA404tor built-up 13 mof ,all structures wIiwh iOOOO havuzga 60O0 square feet or less 14 figolPtvw#WWWPPRICtRiPPREfg#WintMl!Alft4F::!gFPFNres 15 having a foopnnt greater than 10,000 60O0 square feet shall1111i 16 ggigglmgtg01444iimgEhevaglivIckeilapagatilogmlanigottwitsystem 1 7 • (enclosed on all sides) Stan&ng seam metal roofs shalt be constructed 18 ortrOoriiireatediponlnettAgimattefirigthi and clad with coinpusitioii 19 shingles, slate or a rnannad.e slate-like product Metal root with lapped- 20 seamed constniction,bituminous built-up roofs,and flat,membrane-type 21 tgR001401VareMsibleshaltbrIOMIntat 22 C ?c Mechanical Equipment Screenmg All bwkfrn shall meet th standards as set forth in&ctin 419 I of this ordinance All buildings must 25 be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite 26 dishes shall be visible. fiom SII 114, Carroll.Aveaue bvt*een SII 114 27 and-Fls+-1-7097÷14-15e9Tancl-IM4958-ancl-adiacent Re-W-and7Lorfrom 28 piopcity 400' of a peupCity LIC-1,121.Li act-LA.7mA rub-ideLitial 29 as4owvrffiediurrrdensitrresidentiattnrthe_Land_usepiaroettuvty:K::*K:::::::::-*::K:i•",*i:::i:s,.-*I: 3 0 400 • • • • . . 3 1 toodothglimpfge• This shall include equipment on the roof, on the 3 2 ground or otherwise attached to the building or located on the site. 3 3 34 • 3 5 • • . 3 6 systems described inIajh {b) 3 7 feature which s integral t thebuilding's deàign and ensures that such 3 8 vs11e. The fen 'of or oc1osuie adividual 3 9 ntetha*al units shall flotbe gf:e •f:.•: ".• 40 •• 41 All oo10 42 tielifidimtatk• • '1 • •ed:AatatiPlaigint 4fitti*if ofsite p'an 43 WPM* 4 di Facade Articulation: On all iiini-Dnizslc-family buildiusD all facades which are visible from SI1-Hiii7C-arroll-Avenue-betweeir SH1-14-artd-FM-1-7439; 47 offh++709;Tind*or are,vithitr 40eLofirProPertriinevf/rtractzoned AN480-CC7.WPD Draft No.7,Dated.htly 17,1998 Page 8 • • 1 i G1:AlRltial or dGsi' • alas lV V1r or anerlluin-tivnait' i‘oiantial. it the La11d :.immir ••1 .. v.:;k�t!iKS$,- 4 4%Oi:; •tt:.:: the following .:. :. ».: '::.::..:::.:..... .. .:. .v.... ..1. n.:.:Av:{:..:.::.•� .:.. .. 4 horizontal and vertical articulation must be met (see Exhibit 43-A for 5 clarification). 6 7 i. Horizontal Articulation: No building facade shall extend 8 greater than three (3) times the wall's height without having 9 a minimum off-set of 15% of the wall's height, and such off- 10 set shall continue for a minimum distance equal to at least 11 25% of the maximum length of either adjacent plane. 12 13 ii. Vertical Articulation: No horizontal wall shall extend for a 14 distance greater than three (3) times the height of the wall 15 without changing height by a minimum of 15% of the wall's 16 height, and such height change shall continue for a minimum 17 distance equal to at least 25%of the maximum length of either 18 adjacent plane. 19 20 _ Height: Same as in underlying zoning. 21 • 22 outlined i i-S&livll III her�;lr. t. c 26 27 ...:......:......w.......:..... ....:::..: ii'•::ij::i::::{:.:.:::►:.ti':::i:..::>'iv.,'}•v..:.�::.::::..•.v:kv::::::•.}yv::;.:;.::::.: F::::•:.::.:..:... v::.;::::::•: 2831 '' :7'+ 1 : ►: .;. ......; ::.t..t;,s 1:< Q:: <e :: nd :ii:•ii;:j};:;i:;:•-:•:•,:_ii:rii'rri:�:>•':}i�ii:•ii:?ivt�ii�4iY-''�iiiF+''�ji'rii•'.:i:'`:".''`:iii:{::i?i4:iyii�iii?iii • ::w:::::::; :.:�:::. ,•::»::4:ti•'ftt4:4v...•yv.:.. .. ::::::.} :: .......,n Y 32 • : :: . ,{.';. •.C•.i;r• 9•`: ti.{.<,v'•'t"••,<:+'R�'y�v',•.•»+Kt•:�•: a',�.•4 ,� •.yy,. .?;;�y'r;.: 34 .,..:;..rr:f•,. .✓. r, �a •.S .h +. ro :''�''• 'hi{ .`:t:�:y;'�:;:;% 35 .�....::«:<• ::::..::.::.,:•:.. :�:.;...�.'Wit, ��;;..;t .•�;�.::,; � ..' <..... +"��'�� 1�. �Y:x:.ttw ....,....,:.: .::..:.. ::.:v»;;.........rr r:::.vi::{.:;.}v.};.}};};tr4,v.•. ,}:4?:•4:;Y•.;1M:j.F r.}f4`�:.\,-v,v,. �:Y:r•�}•ktiiir;.y:�;`.' 36 37 38 4 . Trash Receptacles :;. :''' `'.'..:: ..`.°: All t1 aslri ecp tacles and 39 recycling-receptaeler-shall-meetthe-standards-arset-fortir in--Section 40 43.9.c.2.d of this ordinance. 41 42 :•%::•i'r4}i::+/.•ii}i�•:i•:':4:-•�:•::.i:•}.:{:{.}}..;..:':4iti:.:::4.'Y•:::ti•:•':i:••i:::n:: 43 :i::••l'.?:.'•ii: :,:;Y. <•:vQ:. r..::.::{•jj: ,•+f•..•:.f:n ......v. f;: �� : #.. . .6 agit . . •><:t tadit ,_:<•,::`::�•::><>>crash a d .::..,:.: :: : 44 receptaclesshall be four sided with a gate and located outside bufferyards, and to the side or rear of the principal building. They shall 47 A\480•CC7.WPD Draft No.7,Dat&duly 17,1998 Page 9 1 be screened by a minimum eight foot(8) solid masonry screen and shall utilize similar masonry materials to theprincipal-structure t ' Q „ .........:... 4 5 43- 1 SETBACKS- Setback of-No,i-residential Sti uctu,eD ' 6 7 No nonresidential building may encroach in the area above 8 a line having a slope of 4:1 from any property line of a residentially zoned 9 • property or a property with a low or medium density residential land use 10 designation in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. However, a structure 11 may be built up to within 40 feet of the residential property line, provided 12 that the structure is no greater than one story or 20 feet in height. (See 13 Exhibit 43-E for clarification.) 14 15 16 residentialreSidatifiat Strafiliffiketibideikiett shall • W : fanttu:ya;.:..:::• .: :...;:a t*the:-jt-. < d 18 s a: :x ::f::the:::....... .:;:>: nil :<: s dent€ ::pro :..r y witbi 4„0, 19 bWnvitiol*Owttht ant e . ds e=4 don`t is thie 20 oliaiixoninsmwt 21 22 43 1-2 - Spill-over Lighting: .............................................................................. 26 1. No use or operation shall produce direct or indirect illumination 27 across a residential property line from a source of illumination nor 28 shall any such light be of such intensity as to create a nuisance or 29 detract from the use and enjoyment of adjacent property. 30 31 2. A nuisance shall be defined as more than two-tenths(0.2) of one foot 32 candle of light measured at the property line. 33 • 34 bAi Noise: 35 36 1. Measurement: Measurement of noise shall be made at the 37 residential property line with a sound level meter and octave band 38 analyzer meeting the standards prescribed by the American 39 Standards Association. 40 41 2. Noise Level at Property Lines: 42 43 (a) Nighttime Noise Level: Noise levels shall not exceed 49 dBA 44 at a residential property line between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. (bpi (b) Daytime Noise Level: Noise levels shall not exceed 56 dBA at 47 a residential property line. A:1480-CC7.WPD Draft No.7,Dated July 17,/998 Page 10 ���f 1 • (c) Octave Band Standards: At no point along the bounding property line of any lot or parcel in a residential district shall 4 the sound pressure level of any operation or activity exceed the 5 decibel limits specified in the octave band groups designated in 6 the following table: 7 8 Octave Band Range Decibel Band Limit 9 (cps) (dB re 0.0002 microbar) 10 37 - 75 80 11 75 - 150 68 12 150 - 300 61 13 -300- 600 --- 55 14 600- 1200 51 15 1200 -2400 48 16 4800 - 9600 43 17 A scale(for monitoring 56 purposes only) Noise Level Adjustments: 20 Nighttime Noise -Between 7 am and 8 pm- Subtract 7 db 1 21 Impulsive Noise- Subtract 7 db 22 (Meter reading changes at a rate greater than 10 db per 23 second) 24 25 - 26 3. Higher Ambient Noise Levels: Where ambient noise levels from 27 • traffic or multiple sources already exceed the standards, the subject 28 source may not increase that existing noise level. 29 30 0.1W. ' . 31 et Thit 1 # F 1E #1 trance........................................................................................................................................................ 32 33 34 SECTION 5. 35 ..................... ...................... 36 Ordinance No. 480,as amended, is hereby is by adding new sections 8.6, 16.6, 1' 17.6, 18.6, 19.4, 20.6, 21.6, 22.6,23.6, 24.6,25.6, 26.6, 27.6, 28.6, 29.6, 30.6, 31.4 and 32.4 ce each respectively to read as follows, and by renumbering the remaining sections accordingly: A:4180-CC7.WPD Draft Na.7,Dated:duly 17,1998 Page u �1:B'nr:t{..I sfi�"3v,?.nx'n�-y va.rnxi.r f,b uS,s4'rFr xj, 58i ,n{�. t n f _f `i,r� Cie - •.rw -6 ' •d. . • • ."�N yt A f..:}'F _._..a. pp .. ifs?� ao�.2 f•i' {s •:•::: 3�. 4 s7j f/;;05+ ' njyD '4}4i .1' ....... .. ..: •'?•.'i��?!y":':?{:+-�i�f�::.�r:w::(:n.:{.?• :nf r?\i:{j??r::::::}:�:nv:: 5 ......- 1 . IW ::: 7 ' wr ....n...'`..: .> :- ...".•.' iffic...•,.twith a..:<.:�:..'. .�-'.-;:. .. . tioia €::£his .. .... .:,:.::.+:; .....:•:'•yv:?'•::;?::;'•:::?':rS;,•r::8':x:`.r:2::xisr::::�•::::{•,:-????:{:. .:?.?:•?:{,::.:u?::::.,.:{•::.:ka::'{?.?:::: _.. 8 tt t ::n:' ice .....fin•..-. ifil? : >$� " 9 10 SECTION 6. I1 12 Section 43.9.b, "Variances," (Corridor Overlay Zone)-of Ordinance No. 480, as 13 amended, is hereby amended by adding the following provision thereto: 14 - - 15 :;:"Variances-At the time of review of any required Concept Plan or Site Plan, 16 the City Council may grant variances to the development regulations set forth 17 in this section t• , x'° o � �g 18 R i :ed_ :::1 <.....:. x.:.:..:.....:...:::..,;:..:..:.x:.....::..:.::,::.:...r.:< :.....::.» :.:..,.,... ::: ..:..,::::::"....:..",.::::.::::.,?::::::....e •{;in::ih:r.::i:?:.???}ii?ii?:':n•::i::i::i::i::i:::iS:::�:i:::'vi�:::�:i::::i::::•:i::::i:Y..-�?-::i::i`�.::i::ii :ii::�:::{:S::iii':i::i::ii::::{::{::i::::i...:'�:::i:::?::i: 19 20 other €s The= i y. oiutal mt a g,:..:....,...:... :::�..x:.....::-::.t , ore:.. � 1us: :: ;«'./—::>::: :n.:.rperce:,:: I-0,4 ..fthe:r r• •:: atiagtogipatkligggpoget 24 4 25 SECTION 7. 26 27 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of 28 Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with 29 the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such 30 ordinances are hereby repealed. 31 SECTION 8. 32 33 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, 34 sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, 35 sentence,paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid (16.,, judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not 37 affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this A1480-CC7.WPD Draft No.7,Dated July 17,1998 Page 12 �c-49 1 - ordinance,-since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the L. incorporation in this ordinance of anysuch rp unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, 3 paragraph or section. 4 SECTION 9. 5 6 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to 7 comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall 8 be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that 9 a violation if permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 10 - SECTION 10. 11 12 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all 13 violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances 4 affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, (50, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether • 16 pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance 17 but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. 18 SECTION 11. 19 20 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this 21 ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the 22 operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all 23 courts without further proof than the production thereof. 24 SECTION 12. 25 26 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for 28 a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and A148OCC7.WPD Dri1 Na 7,Dated July 17,1998 Page 13 1 - --if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation cri of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its 3 caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of 4 this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. 5 SECTION 13. 6 7 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and 8 publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 9 10 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS 11 DAY OF , 1998. 12 13 (se—, MAYOR 17 ATTEST: 18 19 20 21 CITY SECRETARY 22 23 24 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS 25 DAY OF , 1998. 26 27 28 29 MAYOR 30 31 32 ATTEST: c 36 CITY SECRETARY A.\480-CC7.WPD Draft No.7,Dated:.My 17,1998 Page 14 1 Ai!Q 1 - EFFECTIVE: (11.pe APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGA LITY: 4 5 6 7 CITY ATTORNEY • C A:1480-CC7.WPD Dre No.7,Doled:duly 17,1998 Page 15 1 C--1CI 1_ ._ .. . ORDINANCE NO. 480-CC 11111151 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS 4 AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE 5 OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, REVISING 6 CORRIDOR OVERLAY REGULATIONS; CREATING 7 RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY DEVELOPMENT 8 REGULATIONS FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 9 -DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED (400) FEET 10 OF PROPERTIES ZONED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 11 OR DESIGNATED LOW OR MEDIUM DENSITY 12 RESIDENTIAL ON THE LAND USE PLAN; PROVIDING 13 THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF 14 ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY 15 CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS 16 HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;-PROVIDING 17 - FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING 18 FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND 19 .PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 20 21 WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, is a home rule city acting under its charter 22 adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter "^ 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS,the City of Southlake has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 480, as amended, 26 as the zoning ordinance of the city; and 27 28 WHEREAS, the City of Southlake has historically developed as a residential community 29 which is particularly suited for the development of a quality residential lifestyle which is separated 30 from non-single family residential developments which might adversely impact said residential 31 neighborhoods; and 32 33 WHEREAS, several existing and planned residential neighborhoods are located adjacent to 34 properties which are developing or will be developed for business and commercial use; and 35 36 WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Southlake recognizes the vital importance of 37 residential neighborhoods and the need to preserve and protect residential neighborhoods from the 38 potential adverse effects of adjoining non-single family residential uses; and 39 40 WHEREAS, the city council further recognizes that certain areas of the city would not be 41 appropriate for non-single family residential development unless special development restrictions are 42 placed on such areas; and 4. 43 44 L A.\480-CC7.CLN Draft No.7,Dated.My 17,1998 Page 1 1 0-1f) 1 - WHEREAS,the city council desires to protect and enhance the attractiveness of the city to visitors; to promote and stimulate the economy; to ensure the harmonious, orderly and efficient growth and development of the city; to preserve property and property values; and to maintain a 4 generally harmonious outward appearance of both single family residential and non-single family 5 residential structures which are compatible and complementary; and 6 7 WHEREAS, the city council desires to adopt this ordinance for the purpose of preserving 8 and protecting the quality of residential life of existing and future residential neighborhoods by 9 adopting reasonable regulations that will promote non-single family residential development that is 10 compatible and complementary with adjoining single family residential properties. 11 12 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 13 OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: 14 15 SECTION 1. 16 - 17 Section 43.9.c., "General Development Standards", of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is 18 hereby amended by revising the initial paragraph thereof to read as follows: 19 "c. General Development Standards- The following standards shall apply to all 20 non-single family residential development in the Corridor Overlay Zone and 11 the Village Center unless noted otherwise. For any non-single family residential use or building developing within 400' of single family residential property, development regulations set forth in this section ("III. Residential 24 Adjacency Standards" ) shall also be required ." 25 26 27 SECTION 2. 28 29 Section 43.9.c.1, paragraphs(a), (b), (c), (d), and(h)are hereby amended or added to read 30 as follows and existing paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) shall be relettered to (c), (d), (e), (0, 31 (g), and (h)respectively: 32 33 "1. Architectural Standards: 34 35 (a) Masonry Requirements: These standards shall apply to facades which 36 are visible from the following roadways and their respective rights-of- 37 way: SH 114, Carroll Avenue between SH 114 and FM 1709, FM 38 1709, FM 1938, and roadways designated as having sixty-foot(60') 39 or greater rights-of-way in the Thoroughfare Plan.' All facades of 40 the applicable buildings shall be constructed with the same material and all buildings shall meet the masonry requirements as set out in Ordinance No 557, as amended. However, such masonry 43 requirements shall exclude the use of cement, concrete tilt wall and A:M80-CC7.CLN Draft No.7,Dated July 17,1998 Page 2 '1r_21 1 other masonry materials of similar characteristics. In addition, the use of standard concrete block shall be limited to 10% of any facade visible from adjacent public ROW. 4 5 Stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step 6 process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by 7 other processes producing comparable stucco finish with equal or 8 greater strength and durability specifications. It shall be the sole 9 authority of the Chief Building Official to determine when synthetic 10 products are comparable in strength and durability to stucco finishes. 11 These synthetic products shall be installed per the manufacturer's 12 standards by certified installers and shall be subject to staged 13 inspections throughout the construction process. 14 15 The use of synthetic products (e.g., EIFS, Hardy plank, or other 16 materials approved by the Chief Building Official, as noted above) 17 shall be limited to eighty percent (80%) of the building's exterior 18 finishes, exclusive of all windows, doors, and glass construction 19 materials. 20 21 (b) Roof Design Standards: In an effort to screen rooftop mechanical 22 equipment, other appurtenances, and flat or built-up roofs, all 12 structures having a 6,000 square feet or less footprint shall be constructed with a pitched roof. Those structures having a footprint greater than 6,000 square feet shall be constructed with either a 26 pitched, parapet, or mansard roof system (enclo ed on all sides). 27 Standing seam metal roofs shall be constructed of a factory-treated, 28 non-metallic, matte finish. Metal roofs with lapped-seamed 29 construction,bituminous built-up roofs, and flat, membrane-type roofs 30 which are visible from adjacent public ROW shall be prohibited. 31 32 (c) Mechanical Equipment Screening: All buildings must be designed such 33 that no mechanical equipment(HVAC, etc.)or satellite dishes shall be 34 visible from SH 114, Carroll Avenue between SH 114 and FM 1709, 35 FM 1709, and FM 1938 and adjacent public ROW. This shall include 36 equipment on the roof, on the ground or otherwise attached to the 37 building or located on the site. 38 39 Rooftop mechanical equipment and/or other rooftop appurtenance 40 screening shall be accomplished by either the construction of 1) the 41 roof systems described in subparagraph (b) above or 2) an 42 architectural feature which is integral to the building's design and 43 ensures that such equipment is not visible from adjacent public ROW. 44 The fencing of or enclosure of individual mechanical units shall not be permitted except as described above. 47 All rooftop mechanicals or architectural features described herein shall AW84CC7.CLN Draft Na 7,Dated July 17,1998 Page 3 �f, �1- • • 1 be shown on the required building elevations at the time of site plan approval. 4 (d) Facade Articulation: On all non-single family residential buildings, all 5 facades which are visible from SH 114, Carroll Avenue between SH 6 114 and FM 1709, or FM 1709, the following horizontal and vertical 7 articulation must be met (see Exhibit 43-A for clarification). 8 9 i. Horizontal Articulation: No building facade shall extend 10 greater than three (3)times the wall's height without having 11 a minimum off-set of 15% of the wall's height, and such off 12 set shall continue for a minimum distance equal to at least 13 25% of the maximum length of either adjacent plane. 14 15 ii. Vertical Articulation: No horizontal wall shall extend for a 16 distance-greater than three (3) times-the height of the wall 17 • without changing height by a minimum of 15% of the wall's 18 height, and such height change shall continue for a minimum 19 distance equal to at least 25%of the maximum length of either 20 adjacent plane. 21 22 (h) Height: Same as in underlying zoning, unless the building is constructed ?3 within Village Center. All properties which are located within the Village Center shall be further limited in height to the underlying zoning district or maximum elevation of 710 feet (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929), 26 whichever is lower." 27 28 SECTION 3. 29 Sections 43.9.c.2(c), " Loading and Service Areas" and 43.9.c.2(d), "Trash Receptacles", 30 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, are hereby amended to read as follows: 31 "(c) Loading and Service Areas: Loading and service areas shall be 32 located at the side or rear of buildings. A minimum 10 foot solid 33 screening wall shall be required to screen views of loading docks and 34 loading spaces intended for tractor/semi-trailer delivery from any 35 public right-of-way. This 10 foot wall must screen the entire loading 36 dock or space. Screening materials shall utilize similar masonry 37 materials to the front facade. The accommodation of adequate access 38 for service delivery trucks may be evaluated to determine the extent 39 of screening required. 40 41 (d) Trash Receptacles and Recycling Receptacles: Trash and recycling receptacles shall be four sided with a gate and located outside bufferyards, and to the side or rear of the principal building. They 4 shall be screened by a minimum eight foot (8') solid masonry screen A1480.CC7.CGN Draft No.7,Dated July 17,1998 Page 4 Ar 1 - and shall utilize similar masonry materials to the principal structure." 4 SECTION 4. 5 6 Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by revising Section 43, "III. Residential 7 Adjacency Standards," by revising subparagraphs 43.10, 43.11, and 43.12 and by adding 8 subparagraph 43.13 to read as follows: 9 "III. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARDS 10 11 43.10 The following residential adjacency standards shall apply to all non-single 12 family residential buildings or uses located within the Corridor Overlay Zone, 13 the Village Center, and those buildings and/or uses lying-within four hundred 14 feet(400') of single family residential property. 15 16 These standards are in addition to the development regulations applicable to 17 the underlying zoning district and the corridor overlay zone (where 18 applicable). When any requirements in this section are in conflict with any 19 other requirements for the underlying zoning district, the more stringent requirements shall apply. 43.11 PURPOSE AND INTENT-In order to preserve and protect the integrity of 23 residential neighborhoods within the City of Southlake, and in an effort to 24 protect the quiet enjoyment of single family residential properties and to 25 maintain property values, the City has determined that it is necessary and 26 appropriate to adopt specialized regulations for non-single family residential 27 uses and buildings that develop within 400 feet of single family residential 28 properties. 29 30 43.12 DEFINITIONS AND APPLICABILITY-For purposes of this section, the 31 four hundred foot(400)distance shall be measured from the non-single family 32 residential building and/or use to the property line of the single family 33 residential property and the following terms shall be defined as: 34 35 Non-single Family Residential Use or Building - All nonresidential district 36 uses or buildings as well as two-family and multiple-family residential district 37 uses or buildings. 38 39 Pitched Roofs-A roof system having two or more slopes, excluding visible 40 flat or built-up roofs. 41 Single Family Residential Property - Any lot or tract of land with single family residential zoning(i.e., RE, SF-1A, SF-1B, SF-30, SF-20A, SF-20B, 44 and R-PUD)or any lot or tract of land designated as low or medium density AW80-CC7.CLN Dra t Xa 7,Daud•July 17,1998 Page 5 1 - - •- residential on the Land Use Plan. Visible-Capable of beingseen at a height of six feet (6)while gh standing at the 4 highest grade on the residential property line. 5 6 43.13 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: In addition to the development 7 regulations set forth in the underlying zoning district, a plan meeting the 8 requirements set forth in subparagraph 43.9a of this section and meeting the 9 following additional development regulations shall be required to be submitted 10 for any use or building that develops within 400 feet of single family 11 residential properties. When applicable, line-of-sight drawings shall be 12 submitted with the application to assess issues of visibility. 13 14 a. Masonry Requirements: All facades of the applicable buildings shall be 15 constructed with the same material(s) and all buildings shall meet the 16 masonry requirements as set out in Ordinance No 557, as amended. 17 However, such masonry requirements shall exclude the use of cement, 18 concrete tilt wall and other masonry materials of similar characteristics. 19 In addition,the use of standard concrete block shall be limited to 10% of 20 any facade which is visible. 21 22 Stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step Cie process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. It shall be the sole authority of the 26 Chief Building Official to determine when synthetic products are 27 comparable in strength and durability to stucco finishes. 28 29 The use of synthetic products (e.g., EIFS, Hardy plank, or other 30 materials approved by the Chief Building Official, as noted above) shall 31 be limited to eighty percent (80%) of the building's exterior finishes, 32 exclusive of all windows, doors, and glass construction materials. 33 • - 34 b. Roof Design Standards: In an effort to screen rooftop mechanical 35 equipment, other appurtenances, and flat or built-up roofs, all structures 36 having a 6,000 square feet or less footprint shall be constructed with a 37 pitched roof. Those structures having a footprint greater than 6,000 38 square feet shall be constructed with either a pitched, parapet, or 39 mansard roof system(enclosed on all sides). Standing seam metal roofs 40 shall be constructed of a factory-treated, non-metallic, matte finish. 41 Metal roofs with lapped-seamed construction, bituminous built-up roofs, 42 and flat, membrane-type roofs which are visible shall be prohibited. 43 44 c. Mechanical Equipment Screening: All buildings must be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes shall be visible This shall include equipment on the roof, on the ground or 47 otherwise attached to the building or located on the site. A4180-CC7.CLN Draft No.7,Dat d.Mly 17,1998 Page 6 '1 C _ }S • Rooftop mechanical equipment and/or other rooftop appurtenance screening shall be accomplished by either the construction of 1)the 4 roof systems described in subparagraph (b) above or 2) an 5 architectural feature which is integral to the building's design and 6 ensures that such equipment is not visible. The fencing of or 7 enclosure of individual mechanical units shall not be permitted , 8 except as described above. 9 10 All rooftop mechanicals or architectural features described herein 11 shall be shown on the required building elevations at the time of site 12 plan approval. 13 14 d. Facade Articulation: On all facades the following horizontal and vertical 15 articulation must be met (see Exhibit 43-A for clarification). 16 _ 17 i. Horizontal Articulation: No building facade shall extend greater 18 than three (3) times the wall's height without having a minimum 19 off-set of 15%of the wall's height, and such off-set shall continue 20 for a minimum distance equal to at least 25% of the maximum 21 length of either adjacent plane. 22 3 ii. Vertical Articulation: No horizontal wall shall extend for a distance greater than three(3)times the height of the wall without • changing height by a minimum of 15% of the wall's height, and 26 such height change shall continue for a minimum distance equal to 27 at least 25% of the maximum length of either adjacent plane. 28 29 e. Height: Same as in underlying zoning. 30 31 f. Loading and Service Areas: Loading and service areas shall be located 32 at the side or rear of buildings. Where visible, a minimum 10 foot solid 33 screening wall shall be required to screen views of loading docks and 34 loading spaces intended for tractor/semi-trailer delivery . This 10 foot 35 wall must screen the entire loading dock or space. Screening materials 36 shall utilize similar masonry materials to the building's facades. The 37 accommodation of adequate access for service delivery trucks may be 38 evaluated to determine the extent of screening required. 39 40 g. Trash Receptacles and Recycling Receptacles: No trash receptacles or 41 recycling receptacles shall be located within fifty feet (50') of single 42 family residential property. Trash and recycling receptacles shall be four 43 sided with a gate and located outside bufferyards, and to the side or rear 44 of the principal building. They shall be screened by a minimum eight foot (4; (8')solid masonry screen and shall utilize similar masonry materials to the building's facades." A.148.CC7.CLN Draft No.7,Dated July 17,1998 Page 7 1 - 26 1- h. Setbacks / Yards: No non-single family residential building may encroach in the area above a line having a slope of 4:1 from any property line of a residentially zoned property or a property with a low or medium 4 density residential land use designation in the Comprehensive Land Use 5 Plan. However, a structure may be built up to within 40 feet of the 6 residential property line, provided that the structure is no greater than 7 one story or 20 feet in height. (See Exhibit 43-E for clarification.) 8 9 Any applicable structures abutting a local street (i.e., residential street 10 and cul-de-sac as defined in the Thoroughfare Plan) shall provide 11 minimum front and side yards equivalent to the front and side yards 12 required for the single family residential property within 400,' but not 13 less than the front and side yards otherwise required in the underlying 14 zoning district. 15 16 i. Spill-over Lighting:- — 17 18 1. No use or operation shall produce direct or indirect illumination 19 across a residential property line from a source of illumination nor 20 shall any such light be of such intensity as to create a nuisance or 21 detract from the use and enjoyment of adjacent property. 22 23 2. A nuisance shall be defined as more than two-tenths(0.2) of one foot candle of light measured at the property line. 26 .j. Noise: 27 28 1. Measurement: Measurement of noise shall be made at the 29 residential property line with a sound level meter and octave band 30 analyzer meeting the standards prescribed by the American 31 Standards Association. 32 33 2. Noise Level at Property Lines: 34 35 (a) Nighttime Noise Level: Noise levels shall not exceed 49 36 dBA at a residential property line between 7 p.m. and 7 37 a.m. 38 39 (b) Daytime Noise Level: Noise levels shall not exceed 56 40 dBA at a residential property line. 41 42 (c) Octave Band Standards: At no point along the bounding 43 property line of any lot or parcel in a residential district 44 shall the sound pressure level of any operation or activity (ctri exceed the decibel limits specified in the octave band groups designated in the following table: M480.CC7.CLN Draft No.7,Dated.July 17,1998 Page g Octave Band Range Decibel Band Limit (cps) (dB re 0.0002 microbar) 3 37 - 75 80 4 75 - 150 68 5 150 - 300 61 6 300-600 55 7 600 - 1200 51 8 1200 -2400 48 9 4800 - 9600 43 10 A scale(for monitoring 56 11 purposes only) • 12 Noise Level Adjustments: 13 Nighttime Noise-Between 7 am and 8 pm - Subtract 14 7 db 15 Impulsive Noise- Subtract 7 db 16 (Meter reading changes at a rate greater than 10 db per second) (15 20 3. Higher Ambient Noise Levels: Where ambient noise levels from I 21 traffic or multiple sources already exceed the standards, the 22 subject source may not increase that existing noise level. 23 24 k. Variances: Variances to the development regulations in this Section shall 25 be limited to those set forth in Section 43.9 b of this ordinance. 26 27 28 SECTION 5. 29 30 Ordinance No. 480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding new sections 8.6, 16.6, 31 17.6, 18.6, 19.4,20.6, 21.6,22.6, 23.6,24.6, 25.6, 26.6, 27.6,28.6, 29.6, 30.6, 31.4 and 32.4 32 each respectively to read as follows, and by renumbering the remaining sections accordingly: 33 "ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR BUILDINGS OR 34 USES LYING WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED FEET (400') OF SINGLE 35 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY - In addition to the development Cr regulations applicable to this zoning district, the development regulations in "Section 43 III, "Residential Adjacency Standards," shall also apply. When 38 any requirements in this section are in conflict with any other requirements for A.\480-CC7.CLN Draft Na.7,Dated'July 17,1998 Page 9 1- this zoning district,the more stringent requirements shall apply." SECTION 6. 4 5 Section 43.9.b, "Variances," (Corridor Overlay Zone)of Ordinance No. 480, as 6 amended, is hereby amended by adding the following provision thereto: 7 "Variances-At the time of review of any required Concept Plan or Site Plan, 8 the City Council may grant variances to the development regulations set forth 9 in this Section and to Section 35.6, "Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces 10 Required." A parking space variance can only be at the request of the 11 Owner/Applicant and cannot be required by the City Council as a part of their 12 approval of any Concept Plan, Site Plan, Developer's Agreement or by any 13 other means. The City Council shall be limited to granting a variance to no 14 more than plus or minus("+/-")ten percent (10%) of the required number of 15 off-street parking spaces." 16 17 SECTION 7. 18 19 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of ?0 Southlake,Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the r iofsuchordinances, in i p ovis provisions which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances 22 are hereby repealed. 1 23 SECTION 8. 24 25 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, 26 sentences,paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, 27 sentence,paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid 28 judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not 29 affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this 30 ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the 31 incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, (0, paragraph or section. 33 AW80 CC7.CLN Draft No.7.Doted My 17.1998 Page 10 1 - SECTION 9. Any(...., n,firm or co ration who violates, disobeys, Pew � omits, neglects or refuses to 4 comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall 5 be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)for each offense. Each day that 6 a violation if permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 7 SECTION 10. 8 9 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all 10 violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances 11 affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, 12 as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether 13 pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance 40., 4 but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 11. 16 17 The City Secretary of the City off Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this 18 ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the 19 operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all 20 courts without further proof than the production thereof. 21 SECTION 12. 22 23 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed 24 ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for 25 a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and 26 if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation c of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of A:14SOCC7.CLN Draft No.7,Dour&July 17,1998 Page l! 7C-30 • 1 this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. 2 SECTION 13. 3 4 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and 5 publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 6 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS 7 DAY OF , 1998. 8 9 10 MAYOR 11 _ 12 • 13 ATTEST: 14 15 16 CITY SECRETARY 17 18 L) PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 20 , 19?8. 21 22 23 MAYOR 24 25 26 ATTEST: 27 28 29 CITY SECRETARY 30 31 EFFECTIVE: 32 33 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 34 35 • 36 37 CITY ATTORNEY C A1480-CC7.CLN Draft No.7,Dated July 17,1998 Page 12 ?C -3 City of Southlake,Texas L, STAFF REPORT July 17, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-047 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-283/Second Reading/ Rezoning and Concept Plan -The Trailhead STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner,481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator,481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as being Tracts 6A, 7A, and 7B, situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey,Abstract No. 521, and being approximately 19.006 acres. LOCATION: North side of Johnson Road approximately 180' east of Warrington Lane. OWNERS: Jack Johnson(Tracts 7A and 7B) and Hollis Johnson(Tract 6A) APPLICANT: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. L., CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty (20) RESPONSES: Two (2)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Frances Willoughby, 2655 Johnson Road, Southlake, Texas, undecided. "I am not opposed to the zoning change. It's the fine print that worries me." (Received 5/22/98) • Dennis Kelley, 625 Katelyn Lane, Roanoke, Texas, opposed. "We moved out here to get away from what is being proposed and imposed on us all around. We bought our home because of the current zoning." (Received 5/21/98) Donna Kelley, 625 Katelyn Lane, Roanoke, Texas, opposed. "Same as husband's plus environmental issues and animal habitats." (Received 5/21/98) P&Z ACTION: June 4, 1998;Approved(6-0)at the applicant's request to table to the June 18, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. r(t- 1 City of Southlake,Texas June 18, 1998; Approved (7-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 12, 1998, in accordance with the geometry presented tonight; deferring all requirements relating to the Subdivision Ordinance until review of the Preliminary Plat at the next meeting; and acknowledging the applicant's agreement to place an 8' fence along the east side of Lots 23, 24, and 25 adjacent to Gaylord Johnson's property. COUNCIL ACTION: July 7, 1998; Approved(7-0)First Reading subject to plan submitted at tonight's meeting and subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3,dated July 2, 1998,revising Item#la to allow 45'building line on Lot 11,Block 1,and Lot 5,Block 2;revising Item#lb to allow lot line as shown on Lots 3, 4, 5, and 15, Block 2; revising Item #2 allowing 25'sideyards on Lot 1,Block 1,and Lots 1, 7, 8, 13,and 14, Block 2;waiving Items #3a and#3b (2 points of access and number of lots on cul-de-sacs) and being subject to no building pad allowed within 20' of the floodplain. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 29, 1998; Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated June 12, 1998; and Concept Plan Review (tire Summary No. 3,dated July 2, 1998,with the exception of those listed in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated July 17, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-047ZC.WPD L 76-� I . impow \ . ma , Ihr 1 !I (,......, , r1 . a MEDIUM— 1;- 1 1 .f..... 1 St4°3/41) 7T , _____ , 6tiakiiiji z ) NM ' :— •— 1 tWal WI- —, ail ifiri. Aril f'`'°' , ' ri.' 111V. .,•y[:151:t i, _,t, 1 i i i 77 Iv Ulm -- 1 .10t— ; iivZiii______ .9_4,..,,,II-, gme_,,,,„4-- v - /•,,,„,iliallir, , i smi. F-- ' P:_ 41:n.71/1111757:11 impir_'No Allogow Itimoi cato .: I. illpfileall ma ' MIL I .. ,• - . .7 04 \ ----- • ,, , • ii.!,1 H . i . SCHOCL 1.11111 MaillimAsigi lb 111167-41'01010 4' . MI ;Bari Ote d ; ff. :.sib.willi, wog, .mu ..T.11111111111 1 1 1 . e f ;. I G000 1 ' i • 1 , oyaiA i (6., I I I a 8 1 , ....fe-;' ..:c I i TRACT MAP 1 1 i i ? I / -1 D —.5 I 7 1 1 .I I . . __ 4.29Ac TR.3H .50 AC :.--------t"" C 41 \... ,.AG„ j4tioD = > L - TR.3E1 6 Ac "AG" on m P hi: N00 0 m T. SMITH Po ERVEY O 1 m M. SCHRADER U 5,1 TR 3C1A A - 01 2 ® - p TR.8A2A N. m/ .06 Ac Old `. O " O 12 11 ^ t_> `OZ z gat �Y) Do o ' , Yy EN 0 o z w CARRICK CT im• o KE T. KLEPIKOW 15 2 16 17 ,.z.� TR.6D T.E. — Z 2.9 .4c 7.3 H RIDGEWOOD c7 SOUTHIAKE z JV 20 19 18 = T. MARTINEZ O m TR.7A TR6A m 37 3." Ac 6 A' 9.5 Ac C o = Z RIDGEWOOD Z YOl"SF-20A" SOUTHLAKECD 0 JV z 0 a �� AG RIDGEWOOD 7 J 8 SOUTHLAKE _,JV Q 10 g PARAMOUNT TR.6C TR.6 1 Ac 1.67 Ac a, CUSTOM - ,n TR.8A2D HOMES 2.9 Ac WATTS CT RIDGEWOOD, 0 0 SOUTHLAKE co O 13 14 RIDGEWOOD I I SOUTHLAKE Z Z JV o O p . z z N M N D3 N m 71 m m c m c m * �'° S. CORNING L. co o o n I� II F J. PATEL 11 1 c CD I I m AG O 1� g I C 18 AD — ADJACENT OWNERS co "SF 1 A" TR.2C7 TR.2C17 TR.2C18 � ��� 2 Ac 2 Ac "SF-1A" AND ZONING City of Southiake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 98-047 Review No: Four Date of Review: 07/17/98 Project Name: Concept Plan-SF-20A Zoning Request of The Trailhead being 19.006 Acres situated in the JJ.. Freshour Survey. Abstract No. 521 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Fred Joyce - Mary Myers Enterprises. Inc. Goodwin&Marshall. Inc. 1017 W.D. Tate Avenue 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100 Grapevine.Texas 76051 Fort Worth.Texas 76112 Phone: (817)481-3516 Phone: (817)429-4373 Fax: (817)481-4593 Attn: Fred Joyce Fax: (817)446-3116 Attn: Pete Henderson CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 07/17/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The following changes are needed regarding the proposed lotting: a. Provide a minimum lot width of 100'measured at the minimum 35'front building setback line. The following lots do not comply: Block 1 Lot 11 -proposes 45'building setback line. Block 2 Lot 5 - proposes a 45' building setback line.(C.C. Action 7/7/98: Allow 45' setback) b. The following lots do not appear to meet the requirement for perpendicular or radial lot lines: Block 2,Lots 3, 4, 5 and 15. (C.C. Action 7/7/98:Allow as shown.) 2. A 35' building setback line is required on both street frontages for corner lots. The applicant has requested a reduced sideyard setback of 25' for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lots 1, 7, 8, 13, 14, Block 2 ("Back to Back"lots). (C.C. Action 7/7/98:Allow as shown.) 3. The following changes are needed regarding Right-of-Way dedications and interior street geometry: a. Provide two planned points of access(Ord.483-G, Sect 5.01-C). Provide a street stub into the east boundary line of the subdivision. (C.C. Action 7/7/98: Waive) b. Generally, a maximum number of twenty (20) dwelling units should be permitted on a cul-de-sac street permanently designed as such. Additionally, the length of the Cul-de-Sac should not exceed 1,000 feet(Ord. 483-G, Sect 5.01-I). Trailhead Drive/Court is 1238'±in length and has 27 residential lots proposed along the cul-de-sac. (C.C. Action 7/7/98: Waive) (kw/ -s City of Southlake,Texas Council Action July 7, 1998:Approved(7-0)amended as noted above and being subject to no building pad -llowed within 20'of the floodplain. * The applicant should be aware that no drive access onto Johnson Road will be permitted. cc: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises,Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE Goodwin&Marshall,Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\REV\98\98047CP4.WPD C City of Southiake,Texas TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) Case No: ZA 98-024 • Date of Review: 06 -11 - 98 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: The Trailhead (Preliminary Plat and Aerial Photograph) APPLICANT: Prepared By: Fred Joyce -Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. Goodwin&Marshall,Inc. 1017 W. D. Tate Avenue 6001 Bridge Street, Suit 100 Grapevine,TX 76051 Fort Worth,TX 76112 Phone: (817)481-3516 Phone: (817)429-4373 Fax: (817)481-4798 Fax: (817)446-3116 THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817)481-5581 EXT. 848. GENERAL COMMENTS: %Nol1. The aerialphotograph and the transparent overlaythat the applicant submitted meet the P PP requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A. * I walked the entire site. The forested area is made up of middle aged trees, evenly spaced which provides almost a single cover of canopy. The majority of trees are Post Oaks to the west higher land and then turns into Bur Oaks, Black Walnut and Pecan to the east along the boundary of the 100-Year Floodplain. Bur Oaks can be identified on the aerial photograph by the greener patches of color.The entire area has been maintained by allowing goats to graze the underbrush, so there are very few understory trees and no young trees. Most all of the trees looked to be in good health and I saw very few dead ones. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. With the Preliminary Plat transparency laid over the aerial photograph, it looks as though the applicant has designed the layout of the development to preserve as many protected trees as possible. 2. For the development of residential subdivisions; all area within the public R.O.W., utility easements or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat and areas designated as cut/fill on the master drainage construction plan approved by the Landscape C Administrator shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements. All other area shall be subject the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A. BUILDING INSPECTIONS ID -I City of Southlake,Texas 3. For builders and contractors; all area within the driveway, public sidewalks, patios, septic tank and lateral lines,parking area,pool and associated deck area and area within six feet (6')of the building foundation as shown on an approved plot plan shall be exempt from the tree protection and replacement requirements. All other areas of the lot shall be subject to the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-A. A survey meeting the requirements of Schedule B of the Tree Preservation Ordinance shall be required with the submittal of a Concept Plan, Site Plan or Plot Plan when submitted for a building permit request. # Denotes formal comments * Denotes informational comments C BUILDING INSPECTIONS If i) t -7 12tits -.w ........,w....,, ti I • 4 1 i 1 S .. # s .:aa0:o - •-AlE C., 3 M ill 'III al � ° 111116. l.� Ja = ti d 1 1 4. N � e d 'cd } S h $ 4 6 1I 9 i I -i ,m, !'I t- Ill FiLiM= t . tl a9g, _at iii .• i i i --, 4 'W---. jiti 19 1 11 * 11 I PI ' ri: 4" iiiii: -, g LWw ,Ot) .wr«maoe•.ro•1 awl, t - # d —. t g jai fi`-•»_ _-- 1 1#r i e s^ 1I g lc iw :! s ..i�`,'a \3, \ I I I� 'i . WIII: 9N---1--1i W— I : 3 s£. L. lip' .�`I «•/ —— f I'i „i : :__ LI tee-it �' 1 \ 11 ( i fa I i 11 11 I +p n e �� '---- _--- 1 I----,id -_ _ 1 III a .., ... . „ i -=a a i ' _ = I "i I s1F a =a ><r 3 i �', :� `! a :ki ; % is 3 ID AU =9... .3--47 -='.1(‘T.i 'el' � i . ti: ( lask— -. .2 - € ep1............._.........._.....24% 3;ta a` 7x i;ii i WlEi2 F S 1 ' *44 ..5all i \ • I 1 i .i do oJo, _I I \ s• to sad uf%w I 1.. :z a NA ti.G. - ir_ I a ) i . ...,/ ler Y' �+ • III Lp1 / i IIIi = 1 1 /i (y 1 1'••,,.�.-..-•. \ a k� I 1jii_am • (..." 1. iz 1.0).,:y11-11.1.r.,\\ . - tLr 1.____ 11_ -_I 1 _-Dlii %,aaaawww�f,,,�"""" r51.4 a .CA F., s La 4..,, A. •ri. �- +,i + t ! 3 • \ � J 7D 1 __ (taio, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-283 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 6A, 7A, AND 7B, SITUATED IN THE J. J. FRESHOUR SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 521, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 19.006 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-20A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and L WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 1 7D_/p WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a (tme, public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: (1.? Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City G:1ORDIZONING\480.145 Page 2 ID - 11 Li of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being legally described as Tracts 6A, 7A, and 7B, situated in the J. J. Freshour Survey,Abstract No. 521,and being approximately 19.006 acres and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District as depicted on the approved concept plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects C., or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance 11'- I2 G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I45 Page 3 Ce, shall be fmed not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. (61 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 n - (3 Page 4 F CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" BEING a 19.006 acre tract of land in the JJ Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521 situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being that tract of land conveyed to Fred Joyce- Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. By deed recorded in Volume XXXX, Page XXX of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron pin found at the Northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 2 of Ridgewood, Phase II, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3270 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE EAST, 655.00 feet to a point, said point being the Northwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Derrell E. Johnson by deed recorded in Volume 6591, Page 64 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE SOUTH along the West line of said Johnson tract, 1264.00 feet to a point, said point being the Southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Gaylord K. Johnson by deed recorded in Volume 2154, Page 507 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said point also being on the existing North right-of-way line of Johnson Road (ROW Varies); THENCE(ape WEST alongthe existing North right-of-way line of said Johnson Road, 655.00 feet to a point; THENCE NORTH, 1264.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 827,920 square feet or 19.006 acres of land. C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I45 Page 6 r1r- �5 EXHIBIT "B" v. (pi f itt---T ti-t-s i 7, 1 g t2.: %; a I z go �� I MYi s Ells 22; 31 I 1 ! 15J4B 1§E'o . t i i a i Ii;24 1; 1 . . 1 z 9 =i5 � 1 Y I j ! 21 2 O < CS gl.lm I fA * w: I :�= is Jr. 2a= =22- to 2n' :* I �: 2: -4! li' E ' I— :3 35s ii alp -t- iii3V lai i' E a ill �1� �t: ilD, __= sl_e L 1 ]744 le = l-t !i4 11, si —cuaa unarm 44 I v..-- ..,Y... 1 y z— lit ,- as - •- t -- -7a 1° I 1I I- I. II I —,—� - I - o 14 : i • ri.: aa , —nntovaoanv— I El.1.;:° iiiii P. illi !t. ;/ 4/11 .I I I I L ' I _ `_ i :1 1 i tr. , .. " ..„ 7. , 1 1 ,, - I .. 1 = % : ,___s..._:,_ Fr a • \ ;P ell=Il''....."i I7 . i ! I -w ••��,w :.'E •-i '' Si. 2 = �.-- --1....� 1 1 I 1 s�4.31 !i: i� is �: t l c =t a 9 - '-: F \„1.\ i .11 L 1 .i , : , :li.151!21 !i; : 1 --- ,rr---I I "�' s. xiyi 1;Ej ?21 i ii 22 b ) i 'N/ ,; • \ ,a 24: ‘j•P\-/./.. ) Ir\---,,--- -t - , I' .. , ' 1 E I ``✓ I g =.iti 1 '' I ! %i'li 1,_ .., ......„•., ... , in...04., I = v � '... i '4 1 1 1 i1 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT July 17, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-056 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-284/Second Reading/Zoning Change / Tract 1D, Absolom H. Chivers Surveys Abstract No. 299 STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as Tract 1D situated in the Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 299, and being approximately 2.477 acres. LOCATION: South side of East Dove Street approximately 620' west of North Carroll Avenue. OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Michael E. and Cynthia L. Miller CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Eight (8) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Mark and Linda Guest, 2015 Camelot Drive, Grapevine, Texas, in favor of. (Received 6/11/98) P&Z ACTION: June 18, 1998; Approved(7-0). COUNCIL ACTION: July 7, 1998; Approved (6-0) First Reading on consent. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\COMDE V\W P-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-056Z.WPD to i` I C....5, h * ....wg\ . * lip .41 •,` --A iiµ,,wc12. t wak ft -4iit-• "'''' liyai all allminikar 7Lr J*11: S� ,OGNIt- 6"11111111112 a.----- ts.1°- Ill , IP". 1151r1Wowlime _., . -ijs, I • E'er ♦.�.�num IIINA11-Wr4"V4100"-;'0(>1- ,.......„....__ __ 4 . :,. :.. : -.0 ciwAtaita-,..., .. _ . . , ... toks.....i..„ : _ Uili '1----7-7 --L0)• I Imo,. . , 1 °` . 1 �,�y� 44‘ -� 11 } per r sr_ __:A61 it" .--1 r-FH#' SOCCL I A 1i. 2" . i , t / 1 _ II \ \ _ 1 f 1 1 \ - / nTh 1 \ F / 'i i r 1 ` i Sr , r wax LLini — I ! ; ,%)0,:pr i t \ 'lb illb � iL---N N,_ t j, • 11. 1 I i ,_ • E-----7--.' I r--------li all/ j i _. .. . .., fit ak TRACT MAP �� --J-. liS\I3�e A I i ! I ' TR 201 13 10.0 AC • 4 )1C „SF-1 A" "CS" "CS" I E R. PYE CARROLL ISD CARROLL ISD ' 14 1.5 @ I I i „o TRACT 1.0 AC 1 so .,. .50 e. too - - - -- �. - - �,� � E GH " " •„ " a I • � � tiq�- AG AG IA 2A3 -.../7'. TR 1A1 _ 1.917 AC i "SF-1 A" • ' T TR ICI TR 1C 1.65 1 @ 1.65E 1v 2 ( C 1.93 @ 3.07 AC TR 1 I I.g13 @ olie . 4.18 AC I ; t.y p o 0 n M. GUEST TR' 1A10 a Z D cn i'.0 AC ° m z La 77-- ,s. to me R TR 181 R • 1.0 AC I TR 48i C. MCKEE a .8 AC TR A 3 - � 9.0 AC I. 1: "AG" Z TR 43 8 a 1.52 A uro I(kw/ 1 , TR 2C1 . •. 8.78 AC • . _ TR4C 2A ADJACENT OWNERS I ' 931 A� AND 7 '"'ING I R /r�10 E 1 �.ri'o 0 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-284 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1D SITUATED IN THE ABSOLOM H. CHIVERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 299, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.477 ACRES,AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM"AG" AGRICULTURAL TO"SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and (kair' WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by G:\ORD\ZONI NG\480.145 Page 1 the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing.elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly (so" requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City (..., of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 2 is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 1D situated in the Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 299, and being approximately 2.477 acres,and more fully and completely described in exhibit "A" from"AG" Agricultural to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development (iso, of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. LSection 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 3 and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. Cie MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Cie G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 4 C. C APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C C G:1ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 5 (, EXHIBIT "A" WHEREAS MICHAEL & CYNTHIA MILLER are the owner's of Tract ID as conveyed by-deed in Volume 1296R, P. 528 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Miller tract,same being in the centerline of Dove Road; - THENCE S 00°24'43"W along the east line of said Miller tract, same being the west line of Tract 1CI as conveyed to D.J. Wilson Jr. in Volume 7695, Page 52R of the Deed , Records of Tarrant County,Texas for 672.81' to a found iron rod at the southeast corner of said Miller Tract; THENCE N 89°23'12"W along the south line of said Miller tract for 160.54' to a found iron rod at the southwest corner of said Miller tract, same helm'the southeast corner of Lot 1 of the A. H. Chivers No. 299 Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1801 of the C, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 00°241 T E along the east line of said Lot 1 for 671.09' to the northwest corner of said Miller Tract: same being in the said centerline of Dove Road; THENCE East along said centerline for 160.63' to the POINT OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 107,901 crnlare feet or 2.477 acres of land more or less. L, G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I45 Page 7 7e-47 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT June 17, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-045 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-281 /Second Reading/ Rezoning and Concept Plan/The Woods STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581,ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as The Woods, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3432, Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 17.083 acres. LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of Florence Road and Pearson Lane. OWNER: V.T. Cross APPLICANT: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Twenty-two (22) RESPONSES: One (1)response was received within the 200' notification area: • B.H. Drake, 8220 Davis Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas, in favor of. (Received 5/21/98) P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, correcting the error on Lot.1, Block 2, acreage to be shown as 30,000 s.f.; and adjusting the common lot line of Lots 5 & 6, Block 2, to be common with the corner of Lots 17 & 18 of Vista Trails. COUNCIL ACTION: June 2, 1998;Approved(4-2)First Reading subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 29, 1998. r7F-t City of Southiake,Texas June 16, 1998;Approved(5-2)at the request of the applicant to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the July 21, 1998, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2,dated May 29, 1998, with the exception of those in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated June 12, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-045ZC.WPD �F• (2- WESTLAKE CITY LIMIT L KELLER CITY LIMIT /6... Lie IIII II -. j 1 I , i rirlirig 0 • _if 1 MIN 1 - 4 ,, 44 ,_ _ _ , , �� :ice 1 , 1 1 . —I AN p. ! III lin Miall — ell Si- MI.adhlVilL7 1111 01134 6 . . •ir mu siewiairuirr. FR.FIR �. .3 . U ' wit scrim I E:P ES't F 1 6.113110 \ I �NIP 1 - Gib, za: limisi_J.__ lilt alisill PI. TRACT MAP 7r-3 1 ow It co Y W lyO LIa u-a Wa Ja as </VAtt:# i t C LL F- M M i i.� r�`j.� r�`j t n c bC 2 0 < s =- .- 9 W Z W J W ! i < < x0 < ax Z Ma �Q MQ nIX� N , _ Cii d H • A I Z a' t O 1t r� cc cD (� W N W f in co N >C N N N N rx3 .} II Qp y Y rn It ' v f II F- I Z I t � a It 3 I Z i� Q In N I 1 N It NH It m u_ 1I �o v C Ci) Cl) t0 nt z - o r IX to I 1- \ to co \ h I I : Z v W i ZSI11 i Z u Jt co 0 }I z o O N N < O 'r Z ZN CC _ t a W ♦W♦ ♦♦ 0 wt W J V Z co 0 co J J t n 42f ,IOW Q NC ch colrikb It a, it le Ilb r� A U ® a) Cl" 0 o t g V d II Ail v " j.11 p o 111 11 0�_ .'CL W N \ \-n I `—� W o`�(0 a N N DO CI) t ~7 GI IIv. .7 l 7-I X.LI0 S31r1111.f10S I - — t — - - - - - - t . . � . .t S x,LIO N�[�x P. SEMI U a Q U 1n y cd a !n N. � tD W ►-°' 1 i _ sz:i;::' :I:i :111 i i= . -: !I:1i! s I • :; J •:: is i. : I.. h.i • �'"e Ids' :see :i ?£ :z = ' .�. ':.:i : d : £ i - : is '" e\: .. .. i -5. _ s i zi• = - c is acs : i : ` : ! i i : i i a d cis • . e !Si •:•"1: 13'; Hz: ": 2 2 '4: :; :2 :11 2, V Eiz : ::: - 0 . •_-.' s: ' : i i £i :: =c =:i s: 3 :_: ° .- -ii e ii ;13 :i : ._ : : 3: :3 sii :33 :3 g . : : -: : ;©/ d } 1 I fs : :ill .1 _ a:: .31. st 3:: • :6 I . : I`C; i ix•: is I • - - e313 J a1fa.f,N,..A, MI u3a0s SOSONIM I I Y : 3 • : I j 3 a ... - ..-. Z • I i : LL Y C - { a i a I. I I. 3. rc W ' S . S : 'd at .. 1Ntll VIVA I I: 02 a.,_..,u.o, Y I �'" . III ,t":i• W-'r'!I\. % •I O'm.k `si1a L O S = �Ip1�Qlll� '•-i' v,1�� J 3 : < }3 p y '- ��=''j —Il %Wt�• I' S =tee - OT:to : J T 3 ! : 112/4 111Ter-1.L.1211movit'5.i2... i'.1 II I 3 _ - a..-.a'.c• s,u11�: __i e•� a i' I, Y a _ I w 4 om -u :7 19 4 it : i 71. !14- 2..........ALAS—u n,=7 • L HII.,.MM,.a.. .M•1 _ izib'd3'Ir�— t --Zf7V-1lfi1R"7A7R'..-_ •zfl , 3Ntll NOSMtl3e1 :A ,��._ 1..0 p• ras X: - i i! L ...... 9 Zi===q- - • nit ilil • • 7F5 - • City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No: ZA 98-045 Review No: Three Date of Review: 6/12/98 Project Name: Concept Plan-The Woods,being 17.083 acres out of the J.J.Freshour Survey.Abstract No. 521 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Fred Joyce -Mary Myers Enterprises. Inc. Goodwin&Marshall.Inc. 1017 W.D. Tate Avenue 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100 Grapevine. Texas 76051 Fort Worth, Texas 76112 Phone: (817)481-3516 Phone: (817) 429-4373 Fax: (817)481-4593 Fax: (817)446-3116 Attn. Bo Trainer CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 6/10/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998;Approved(6-0)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, correcting the area of Lot 1, Block 2, to 30,000 square feet, minimum and adjusting the common lot line of Lot 5& 6, Block 2, to be common with the corner of Lot 17& 18 of Vista Trails. * The applicant has met all the requirements of previous reviews. * No lot within this addition shall be allowed driveway access onto Pearson Lane or Florence Road. * Any new primary structures constructed on Lots 1 through 12,Block 1,and Lot 1 & 15,Block 2,shall face London Dell Drive. * Denotes Informational comment cc: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE Goodwin&Marshall,Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98045CP3.WPD /F-4 RED J U N 101998 ZONED, SF-LO a'zINN ( �4' Z�E2 SF-LD �r VISTA TRAIL COI.NIM1 ESTATES i 9 I WfCSOR FOREST ESTATES WItO50R FO STPHASE rESTA TES i VOL,388-98. PG :6 I PHASEI IMAM �� �Im< ``� P.R. T.C. T. ZONED. SF-20 b WHOA LEWIS a VOL 3BB-170, PG 74 PRICI I VOL 3BB-20d, PG 42 PRTCT V0.. 4374, PG. 7d O.R. T.C. T. Q I' I LOT 12 LOT 11 LOT O L07 9 LOT B LOT 7 I$ — LOT 17 _ ctit UWiT CITY OF KELLER LINE CITY LIWI1 CI iY OF 50UIHLAKE 125' LINE 430 -- 8. SAIORA SIAVEv R.AB(m WAD ABSTRACT No 13fi9 _ _ _ (ELMMA78A7 SOW) B. SANDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT No 1389 J.J. FRESNOl1R SURVEY RDOI7-SpRVEV. A ACASS7�lb 521 -I� N89'32'00-E ABSTRACT W. 521 t543_BO' _ 50. o0' I6' NOe OE01[ATIOl _ _ _ _ _ AOII aEOIGiION _ _ 19' ^ fl1'— 101' 1a.' Ioi' to. _ _ 10)' 10a -Id. - 101'120_ 200_ _ _ _ _ T ICI} i--I JAMES H. M%R APO' -- EXIST TING 10' UTUT pSEMEN7 / II I I VOL. 10123�PGS 578� D.R. i.C. T. I O1 CARNET A, SUDS 3ONE PRTCi TO BE ABANDONED Q17 0 oI is I Io ZONED: MH N_ Bloch I Block I oLL 20030 sf � o LUO: NEOiUM ^„EN9I1Y V Iw I j m IIIn I I^ ai Block 2 i I 2 3 s 6 7 E 9 10 11 12 I -- j 22860 sf F_ 20033 st 20033 sf 20033 st 20033 sf 20033 si - 20009 sf 20020 sf 21400 Sf 22800 sf 22560 sf 24500 st u I ;20aTHOMAS .I. HART AM WIFE.„SONDRA N. HARTLOT a VOL. 7316. PG. 190, D R T C.T. m35'9L _ � 20756 Sf wa I D: MH I .. SC/�' E I ( to LUC! MEDIUM DENSITY _ I —t I I ZONED. SF-LO izo far for w. o I la. 1- Ica--h �I� 3��.-. _ _:. TR_.� >� 10)� zz LONDONDELLDRIVB —as--;7— 175 �iSG;n laklo09G0 sI0E4lk - RE AND W410,' A-� ,.� OQm I I C DOROTHY g�VA MOORED ARABIAN HORSE iN i tR I]I' —I]r _��„1`._' JCS=S1oE>•.L�/�'f" zo VCL. 5950. PG. 318. D.R.T.C.T. COUNTRY ADDITION ����p �- - p: 4H VM 3BB-124, Pq 27 �i< (-t7Q>-" . ... �3�� ,pp_ �Aa�-� xu I LID' MEDIUM DENSITY PRTCi 35'BL -� COVER 35 i• 13 w \ 29728 a( I. LOT 7 a �a Blockz I� i /fI 3 C[iI ILIMITf I m I o I. n 1 2 3 4 �J �(`P j 1 6 I 7 8 9 to 11 \ \\ "'I 11 JOHN P. MARTIN I n _ . ' 30054 sf I^ IR 1 YOL. IOBB9, PG. 606, D.R.i C T IZr 30043 st 30165 s1 2349f sf 22150 sf 21700 s 20050 sf 20500 s£ 22187 sf w N30013 sf 30000 sf IN TryiN 32512 78 MH st \ I I LUII: MED IpUN DENSITY \ VOL 5950R TPGCARPER 3IB ORTCT — LUO: MEDIUM DENSITY 20 16' I t3t, _ f3r 134, I3r _ 139' 100' :00- too _ _ ;pa' fy Ion :5'S 256 35.00 ioowE599_5 U3A R5fi._50--' °POINCOFVSTA TRAIL ADDITION BLOCK 3 ��BEGINNIIVCIrVST3BB-95, PG. 3OT 21 LOT _OT 188 LOT 9 �j P.fl.T.C.T. LOT 22 3 RUSSELL STAATS ! I I LOT 20 / Vd 7268, Pg fi56 13RTCi I J FRESHOIA No 521 ADDITION . ` EDWAPD K. YCVINV NILMAEL D. BOWMAN R00 A. JGEI:fR 1y Cab A, Sloe 1825 PRTCT ZONED: SFfA AID ETUX I ETUX CARL 0. STUTSMA71 L07 I I EBITH V, VLIANN C110v BOWMAN LENICE K. GE!GER / LUO: LUK DENSITY j BLOCK 3 AND MAMA P. GONZALES IW \ WANDA W. STUTSMdV \ / I 1 VOL. 0355, PG. 1132, D.R.T.C.T. PERK R. CARNACK �bF' w1 ETUX CA' II IP LOT 11 / / LOT 23 I CAROL J. CARNACK yC15 I I^ ALVA R. HORN / ZONED: SF20B ZONED: MH of LUO: NEOIUM DENSITY MARK C. PATTERSON ai LUO: MEDIUM DENSITY j ETAL C1 I J.N. DRAKE AND WIFE ! 1 LTJ10®LAMTUL BARBARA H DRAKE I LOT ;6 LOT 24 I VOL. 11790. PG. 755, D.R.T.C.T. j EO LEWAPOOWSKI LOT ETU B BLOCKT--� LOT9 CURTIS COWANDONVA LEWAfO .. ERDEAERECOICK YPE J. FARLEY CLAUDIA J. COWAN IY W E S GRAPHIC SCALE t-60' 0 60 120 too NOTES THE SUBJECT SITE DOES NOT LIE WITHIN A FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AS DEFINED AND DELINEATED BY FEMA MAP NO 48439CO180, DATED AUGUST 2. 1995 A IQ' TYPE 'B' BUFFERYARO IS REQUIRED ALONG PEARSON LANE THE DEVELOPER WILL MEET THE LANDSCAPE RECUI REMENTS OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SIDEWALKS ACROSS THE FRONTAGE OF EACH LOT MILL BE PROVIDED BY THE INDIVIDUAL oil LOERS AT THE TIME OF HOME CONSTRUCTION. FRANCHISE UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATIONS MAY BE VARIED TO SAVE TREES. LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING a 17.083 acre tract of land in Lne JJ Freshour Survey, Abs Gract No 521 situatatl in Che City of South, ake. Tarrant COUn Cy. Texas and being that par[Ipr1 ,All conveyed CO VT Crass by deed recorded in Va lume 5B93. Page 250 Uf the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly deatr, bed as follows: BEGINNING at a l/2' i on pipe fountl at Che Northeast Corner of Lo[ 22. Block 3 of Vista Te-I1 Atld l Clon. an atldiCionr to [na Ci[y 0f SDUtn lake '.,a oraeU in Volume 3BB-95. Page 3 Of Llie Plat Rec.%Oo of Tarrant Count Y, Texas: THENCE 589'53'30'4 along the North line pf Block 3 of said Vista Trail Addition. B56.50 feet to a 1/2- iron pin found. Sa,d pin fountl at the NorthaaSL corner of Lot t of •n Freshour No 52' AUUi Cion, an addition to Che CItY of Southlake Irecor'detl in Cabinet A. Slide 1925 of the Plat Ra— 5 of iarranG Lbunty, Texas: THENCE S89'47'01-W along the North line of said JJ Freshour No 521 Addition. 690.50 feet to a 1/2- iron pin set: THENCE N00'01'08"W, 477.69 feet to a 1/2iron pin get: THENCE N89'32'00'E. 1543. BO feet Gd a 1/2" iron pin found at the Nor Lhwest corner Of tnat tract of land Conveyed tp James H. Mart In and wife Doris Martin by deed recorded in Volume 10123. Page 1578 of the Deed Records of Tarrant taunt Y, Texas: THENCE S00'24'04'E along the West line of said .Martin tract. 486 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING antl cantoin ing 744, 117 square feet or 17.083 acres of land. GROSS ACREAGE 17. 083 NET ACREAGE 16.497 ROW DEDICATION 0.566 EXISTING ZONING SF-tA PROPOSED ZONING SF-20A LAND USE DESIGNATION MEDIUM CENSr TY LOT COUNT 27 SITE DENSITY 1.58 OU/ACRE Dale Alk .- CITY COUNCIL Dora A,p— Mayor car sk.a>y DEVELOPED BY: PREPARED BY: FREDJOYCE- (GOODWBN3 MARY MYERS ENTERPRISES, Inc. h ARSHALL 9 lD17 W1X Tif A.ra. CVL ENGINEERS - PLANNR- SURVEYORSlnA6 6001 Slklptr OvaK. 51O too. Fart woi = Tons m /2 Metro (817) 4294373 Felt MI71 4463118 CONCEPT PLAN for SF-20A ZONING REQUEST OF THE WOODS BEING ; 17.083 Acres g SITUAT® IN TIM e s JJ. FRESHOUR SURVEY ABSTRACT No. 521 g CITY OF SOUTIR AM TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 27 RESIDENTIAL LOTS CASE No: ZA98 - 045 APRLL 1998 Shm 1 a 1 1 E.{ 5. o 8sing i —1 11:1001 cc) O7 L4i _ y =s' I $ i a §Lsogilli I I ! ' I 9 ' 8 ill ! I 1 ! g 1 y 1': P z Ei i e-- 4 : i 1g - -I I g gg . I g g 3.70.3ti.305 V +iO I • '0 ah _. OIn 3 ,,tt __ r---rat-- I— j I - I� • I'--\\ -�=ao. —�.r'—J n it\ I I III 01{ t I \ag ac.c nra•v: I V1 t �, 1 � .M3M3n .a l3,m{3 v / % I I\\\ _ � i I 1 � I I � z t I [I I3 � i 1 I !A ^ /s i I I ., \ � `., 14 1 I i I : Y -!1 '3R .! S! / / i.i \ iW -21 I i I i l � �`I i 1 , s /// I \ 3 1 I 1 I°1 1 e''1111 I* r 11. 'It_:.:._ 1 ,'*-- ----. / -./ i I 1 .\\ L—xar=-- I I Q ,las - - 11, Wig:- Itj: \ , � ► _ , i , = . s 117 \ ,: 3 I.ti 1. - : 5'q 1 li i' 9 P9 11 " 1 ! 1 I I i I il,I ! 7,1,I,1 1 :I iligip II! ! 9 g l I I I I yff � .. 1 III .A I I � � '� 1 'A3An3a, .1 111'''' - 44 I ril ' /kr'"1/1 '! 11 2 I i 7 ,:i : § n ^ ' . '' -- • -c I c6 '!i 11 bi c 1 1 4 1 • e ig :Z. i :. 2 11; 1 I III Ili' +; g <� y §re eC lq q gd gr., !I :1 III ��; I :: f;ir -�, - - :gi . _ €= _ Lu: i : 2• ?x i u I III III I �6 qti y 1 If !%:•25r 3 b Atig o 2.2 I 9 II I ;;,gig; • . a� :_i . 41 ; I I ,• • 1 .Fai eg= kg; 1=$ !fie$4 fi - i 1 1 ..,a§a gag g:1 a 12 <i I 121 IgI y_ it I! I # zi g�� _ a . Y" s ,z W I-i i ^S 1 1 i' Z cn " - g w fly it g3 _ ' I I. AI i �, i1 �� 23!- Y" n i I VI I A I) i I i�7 q �nI g1Ya 4r1iI 3?��....tea, I I .L lua i{ a I ! a{m{aa{a .2,~v{®a 'I e I nu•aro I,r•'p •ifi�3 3�r�WWnntl��l�•m � ' ."."! iS'nl t]1nl>T,f M.*O.[O.OON - I I(..,.' f` �`I]1'!i 1-•-� 0{AA{3A16b 3nI1{31M33 9MI L8Ii3 1M3M'!ri n{.�ovum"— i a 3M'IM3mY Alt.a arum • I I ye' ii ' < 1 al �-u ii gl h il 1 . : i gi i 1 J1 7F-1 I . Col CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-281 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WOODS AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 17.083 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "SF-20A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN (haro' MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 1 IF, S WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a Lpublic necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page2 17r- / of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being The Woods and being approximately 17.083 acres and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District to "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance ,, shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that G:\ORD\ZO N I N G\480.145 Page 3 a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. C MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: Li G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I45 Page 4 7r- 11 - CITY SE CRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C C G:\ORD\ZON ING1480.145 Page 5 7FI� (re EXHIBIT "A" The Woods, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3432, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 17.083 acres. (le G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 6 7r- /3 ; EXHIBIT "B" ... . .,.._....., ....................... ,,...T.,..t...., I q 2 - 161 eloi' 111 . ,.3, , .. - . • : . - • 5'. (.., 8 a g 1 - - , • t 44.c 1 . .. . . . . gs • Z NI 0 < ::. ..: [!, i.•-• , ...., ,, . . . re 33.00S • i ,..• ....., It t 4 s -, 2':,.i ,-,: ,'Y ,„' ' ;.. . " • . 6 g ‘.i., ri . : i ) . ;! ii- ,.......47.:4.0. . : glagaggiagamog :., / I ..., , .., , 1 / . , .. , 5 '29. \r-culi 1 \ .:1: • - . 9V1 \ •••• 3 s s• :•.. s:, qi-' i \ \ g ,.:7,.; 7 7 1:2.,.:. ',.•; 1:':•, idl 1 7':f 't .A • 4 I :4 \ - . i =: •/,' 7' I I • • t '• I I r.1 S• Wil' I i 3 ',1 X 1 P.:: • I , 1 I p I • . .:- .4'1 :: !•::: •• 1 R L 1 , ,. . „ . _:. , , .,. ..., , // ;,_- / :: , . ... _ , , .. .. I * , I I / ' Sg=',. :',7 :i:7 '! :•',4 :: .3.3 -1.: -..; :': .•:. : ....! •,... 1 i. • i ! I . - - j--I ' I . ' :•.,.= .. r'.' '' 4:II '.,":, •,.., ^r. :1,1 ' .,; .. -- . ,,:;-:: ss ::: • s T1.: .s4 I . ' ... "‘ „::: .,:•r• -:,:K 4 - ,..". .. ...: 1 r—t•- 1 I,.. ! 1 1 i•.:m 1.-• ,',r•„ 7 't: F-,' „1, F. : A. t.c..,-:, !"..i zr,..-i r. s -,',F.,.. :.„• •".• - -' - -4 - - '' ' •••i \ '.1 t t3 g 1 i l'y , _ . :. ..4. It "I". 2: F.s- s s •.. ,.• .•-. • _ , ...- - .1...3.3::.: sr- r.gr F. •,-,,..„.., , • ' - 1 . ..1 c41"411'4.- I ,, = -:•== "::.3 ',.... - '7'3: rr ' F•':.- !'"`• '';',::".: ': :'S r'1.. 3.: 5L:!7-..ii::•:•ii.C. ::'1 :::::. 7.!: ••••..S -='s 7::.-!....:: ,..E.,- .,.: I . . r'• • --I I -4:::• .: :.s s,:i4"•.• 4:r ;,v;I I_ _ -.< . -':F.'.r;',::.•••=i,7•' .. - gi:''-..:';' •:.:,r --.:.:.•).:::-.......7. :,,e,4,.,,,,,,4 1:isiis....;:l'i 7.'::i'l=... .•7.:.'74 :'..1 • ":5: 'I: ".. I I 11 1 1 4 . 1 i i , - ...... 1 " W ' -:.;•1 . 3.-.:- ..s.::.: ''/..:•.,,f--, • . ... , V.14.•.: , - .... 3 I 1 . • i:I•sii r.1.• 3::,,;..r....;. • 1 ,-, Z-*(11 •s-, . .'' l' 1 " g . i I 1. s 3 o!" ' I 1 .....:..:..- _:,• _,-.._-.,.- 1-- ei •. -I.-- „ _L - •ru1oV.. riFi4 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT July 17, 1998 CASE NO: ZA97-085 PROJECT: Site Plan - Solana Park Circle STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for Solana Park Circle, on property legally described as being Lot 2,Block 1,Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1 to the Town of Westlake, Tarrant County and Denton County, Texas. LOCATION: North side of Kirkwood Boulevard, south and west of State Highway 114, and east of Precinct Line Road. OWNER: Maguire Partners Westlake Partnership APPLICANT: Maguire Partners CURRENT ZONING: "NR-PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Complex, known as Solana, to include the following uses: "0-2"Office District,"C-3"General Commercial District, "B- 1"Business Service Park District,"CS"Community Service District and"HC"Hotel District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Two (2) RESPONSES: None P & Z ACTION: July 17, 1997; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table to the August 21, 1997,Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. August 21, 1997; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table to the September 18, 1997, Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. September 18, 1997; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table to a future date and to re-advertise when the date has been determined. July 9, 1998;Approved(6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated July 2, 1998. 7�- - I City of Southlake,Texas C STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Site Plan Review No. 1, dated July 7, 1997,and Site Plan Review Summary No. 2,dated July 2, 1998, with the exception of those items in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated July 17, 1998. L:\COMDE V\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-085SP.WPD C C 16 nin R9 tDt till lailice \ IC t Rs ttq, , IQ t, t tR Zi 7 15 t I ` '" ItAC !lam Pet I t 1 W.ND-t t t I S�tVEY A-158� � t W.H.PEA ,a R u ' :11- 4A_ A-1045D '. R 3 t R4 ... •� ft t ' J. ' -` SURVEY A-742 t Iii e �.r,tolisimi r r R 5 G:r1�3lir •l. R t Tg - i� i �- ' 1 ,AC TR to • R CAI \�9s's C V\y te sq ''' . L ., \\:11-:\.. :0 it ''': ' 'II. " i `00\% \ 11211 �R�. Si to a �� I I r IIIIIIIIr t 1 t . ' -OOP \:2111 y Limit t- _ - - r� I SURVEY A-1510 I ' ' 1 t mitS _ .MA, t t„ çL i fa inrS Bwpd ' rld-^3 , P =1 I TRACT MA .lii,� angi •1 ,� ��a W MEDC/N A 1 9 5 8 - ASURVEY TR S 8.33 AC ------------- TR 10 MAGUIRE THOMAS PARTNERS "NR—PUD" MAGUIRE THOMAS PARTNERS "NR-PUD" (ow TL MTP-IBM / (. 1. - • TR 2 65.14 AC (54.64 AC) 00a Bln. "NR—PUD" MTP-IBM eG - Tf C SCR a a a DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a Parcel B is currently undeveloped. ' II. The following exceptions from the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance 480 are within Parcel B: • A. Height 1. Building Height - No building housing B-1 zoning shall exceed three (3) stories nor shall it exceed forty-five (45) feet in height. ' 2. Parking Structures - No parking structure shall exceed four (4) stories nor shall it exceed forty-five (45) feet in height. 3. Architectural Features - Architectural features (not intended for human occupancy) which are integral to the architectural style of the building (including spires, belfries, towers, cupolas, domes, feature walls and 3 similar features) may not exceed the height limits of this section by more than twenty (20) feet. • 4. Mechanical Equipment/Penthouses, Ventilation Equipment, Antennas, Cooling Towers, etc. - These ancillary uses shall not exceed the actual height of the building by more than twenty (20) feet. B. Parking 1. Parking space sizes a. Minimum of 7.5' x 16' - Compact b. Standard size - 8.5' x 18' c. No more than 25% of spaces will consist of compact spaces. • C. Buffer Yards S 1. No buffer yard will be required where the setback along a public street • is 50 feet or greater. ID 2. In cluster-type development, no buffer yards will be required between • like uses. D. Landscaping • Due to Solana's unique landscape design, the landscape palette will be • consistent with the existing developed areas of Solana. Landscaping design will be submitted and approved at the site plan phase of S development. 7G DR-18 • • E. Release from Section 43, Corridor Overlay Zone • (tage • Parcel B shall not be subject to the Corridor Overlay zone requirements as defined in Section 43 of Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Solana will • continue to be a comprehensively planned, mixed-use business center which complements the high quality residential areas of the City. Solana's 1 innovative style includes concepts of clustered buildings with generous ' spaces surrounding them, distinctive and liberal landscaping, quality construction methods and materials, sensitive screening, etc. By continued use of these elements, Solana accomplishes the goals of the Corridor Overlay Zone in its own distinctive style. •• F. Off-Street Loading - With the following exceptions, off-street loading shall be provided pursuant to Section 36 of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance 480: 1. The minimum dimension of loading spaces shall be as follows: 10' x 25' regular size space • 10' x 50' large space 2. The calculation of the minimum number of off-street loading spaces • shall be in conformance with the following schedules and rules • regarding shared spaces: • a. Number of spaces: Office Uses or portion of building devoted to office uses: • 0 - 49,999 sf 0 spaces • 50,000 - 149,999 sf 1 regular space AO 150,000 - 249,999 sf 2 regular spaces 250,000 sf and up 2 regular spaces and • 1 large space • Retail and Restaurant Uses with the following building size: a 0 - 9,999 sf 0 spaces • 10,000 - 49,999 sf 1 regular space • 50,000 - 99,999 sf 1 regular space and 1 large space S b. Loading spaces that are adjacent and accessible to several • buildings, including buildings on separate lots, shall be allowed to suffice for the loading requirements for the individual buildings provided that i) the number of spaces satisfies the requirements for • the combined square footages for the buildings in question, and ii) for loading spaces to be shared among separate lots, an agreement evidencing the right of Owners to the use of such i spaces shall be provided. DR-19 '7 6 1- rn a) .:1+ a use „ x y6 S -) $" g i3 , 3 a i a ! i g III C;.1_q.'I. -off:ey S '!igi ,�. ■ `�� ' - y:.yliaf5ili,l fiilI 8 `� ; , if 1 "-$I : ;p" 8 S xl 4 t i/ "ySjara = x., o s" ; r Sc 1 off $ " ' 3 $`d :s' l ggy1 IE ° ' } r`' ygj `'�I i8 ifii a: ^o s' .33!;71'ai fflhi �� .Ll�! /•¢, . :,,, , r s-Is / Il illll siiii ''.' 1 L-d-,1-F--.'--- -. -i 1-- . ;,///'_,..„<-\ 1 \\,\ ill,,:.?: _____, -"..eve E3} �.\v ///I 1 Z L till NL,r,.., 4 .7, .. ' ',..'' "' -.... ' 1 ' \li.: ' , I ,'\I 'el ,... :, :4-'°...11 n: '1P-V.i":.:. 1. ' .S I i 1 7 W Sci -ilia O. , Y 'iys \ ,,, ' �',: O d'- --- -.. o"x_- _.—___ i -.} 1.-J`� J ___ ,, _ m S. _ -__—'_-__ —._ 1 �^ b Y, , 3 ` ,:,5 7, �C II•� �J I „., , , , O iX ' ii —L � d4r ili ..„ l ---:::L__L_ -- i al ,, : yy.,�$ppY...ab• ,� 7 I. . E' 4: ::,: :I : 141 -'':. I 7 • '.yi 4 bx_.h A S- x^�[ / 4 Lk yy Y, CO �`F �< :I-- d.& f Sc . I Sc -, r. .;'�� Tea�""'.o�. ,�3 , �.n.f s � £ �v � i Yir 1 6 Y /jf�} "�iC'2 �1 Y 9 t Rx$2'.�,k.�. 3 'f,F 2b b Yj i. E` Y Y S �f r 'fur- 1. 'i C x , -.... J""+S i6°" ✓, f Y s E�S u l5 X ir, i_ Y 4 ,Nt T S `i w, ,� 4 " 4 „ YS Y g \a�vanlarcwr ,.,,-,-,-,-.-7,,,..7 , - Er,'„ilifilhc,,, • . ,),2 ..s~.n.w, ,1i; 5 S 4 IG -7 ' City of Southlake,Texas , SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Lase No.:ZA 97-085 Review No: Three Date of Review: 07/17/98 Project Name: Site Plan-Solana Park Circle being Lot 2 Block 1,Westlake/Southlake Park Addition No. 1 and being 22.618 acres APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Maguire Partners/Westlake Partnership Huitt-Zollars.Inc. Attn: Ocie Vest.P.E. 9 Village Circle. Suite 500 3131 McKinney Avenue. Suite 600 Westlake.Texas 76262 Dallas.Texas 75204 Phone : (817)430-0303 Phone : (214) 871-3311 Fax : (817)430-8750 Attn: Richard Kuhlman Fax : (214) 871-0757 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 7/13/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 880. This lot is shown on the proposed development plan as Parcel B and this review is based on Parcel B development regulations. 1. Label on the site plan(Sheet 1 of 8),the height of all buildings, architectural features (e.g.,towers, feature walls,planters,etc.),fences,mechanical equipment and ventilation penthouses and screening devices. 2. Specify the finish material of the penthouse portions of the buildings shown on the elevations. Materials must comply with the Masonry Ordinance. 3. Clarify the phase lines on the Phase Plan(Sheet 4 of 8)and provide a chart showing the number of parking spaces with each phase of the development. 4. The following changes are needed with regard to fire lanes: a. delete"Temporary"from the fire lane west of the parking garage. b. Any dead-end streets or fire lanes, created due to construction phasing that exceed 150' in length, must be provided with an approved turn-around for fire apparatus. This turn-around can be eliminated at the time that future construction provides through access. 5. Add fire hydrants to the symbol legend. 6. Show the location,orientation,type and height of any intended lighting, signs,and exterior auditory devices. It appears that some of the parking spaces and fire lanes between "3 Park Circle" and the parking garage are within the area of a storm water collection facility. Appropriately relocate the facility and revise the grading plan. An offsite easement may be required. City of Southlake,Texas 8. The following changes are needed with regard to easements: Co., a. Clearly show,label,and dimension all easements on or adjacent to the site. Increase the line weight of the utility lines shown on the Utility Plan to improve readability. b. Provide easements in accordance with approved utility and/or construction plans. Since the plat for this development has already been filed of record,any additional easements recorded would be filed as separate instruments. Label the filing information for any such easements (Vol. Pg.). c. Identify the apparent easement shown running under the.tower structure(off-center)between the"1"and"2 Park Circle"buildings in the utility plan. Identify if lines shown on the utility plan are public or private. If they are public,they must be placed within an easement. No structures may be built over public easements. The tower structure between "1 & 2 Park Circle"therefore,may require the relocation of sewer/water lines or the removal of the tower. 9. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns,building corners,drainage paths, etc. Include directional flow arrows in all flow lines, * The addressing of this development will be from Kirkwood Drive. The applicant may name the individual buildings"1 Park Circle"etc.but the official addressing must be in accordance with the 911 addressing grid. The Development Regulations for this site specifically provide that it shall not be subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone requirements. * Depending on the construction type chosen,60 feet of yard may be required surrounding the "3 Park Circle"building.A filed yard maintenance instrument may be necessary if such a yard extends outside the subject lot. Such and instrument must be provided to the city prior to the issuance of a building permit. The need for this requirement will be evaluated upon review of the final construction plans by the Building Inspections Department. * A reciprocal fire lane agreement must be in place prior to the issuance of any building permits. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plan, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes Cshall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment 16 -Q City oi Southlake,Texas i t 1 Huitt-Zollars,Attn: Mr. Ocie Vest,P.E. t i Maguire Partners,Attn: Mr. Richard Kuhlman, Vice-President i L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\97\97085SP3.W PD 1 i i C , (10/ a- - 10 • City of Southlake,Texas (.., TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT) Case No: ZA 97-085 Date of Review: 06-24 -98 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Solana Park Circle APPLICANT: Prepared By: • Maguire Partners/Westlake Partnership Huitt-Zoliars Nine Village Circle 3131 McKinney Ave/Ste 600/LB 105 Westlake,TX 76262 Dallas,TX 75204 • Phone: (817)430-0303 Phone: (214)871-3311 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT(817)481-5581 EXT.848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: A Tree Survey was not submitted.The only protected trees are located to the west were it is shown as a Wildflower Meadow.I do not think that they are within the scope of the development.The other trees on the development site are Cottonwoods and Willows. # Denotes formal comments * Denotes informal comments c - . rIG - I BUILDING INSPECTIONS - . • • r - /1 „ur• s I ', 41 I ,!t ur 1 Ii +1 j� S a i 1 1 0 5-;4111111 IJ, iE1 " ttk 1 I IfII sg sbe 1 - r. \ ,'mil I Mil . ll,, , iP4 11,4 / / fi i t�,.� I III - r5)) 1 k .. 1. al_t__, I I___...=, ..._i_..11 1 1'4 1 1 1 ,r -1 a .--- 4 a : `�. , 1 -47 ,1 i�c....: !. _ _____. c)- s i 1 : , 44.! i ii, .iE_ 1; r _.,\, -I 1 1 a 0.- : ... ) u,\ 1 , 1 I ��+ 11 . ' u _" rA°' ' % a31 ' 2.1t tn cC :oo- rggI .11 1.11.1 _ — au g�wti v y (0, 1 E-- ": - f I.4 •]->- - 3 ..... . fit-4A" I ft-. :. .-, F §ff , ..; 1. -. • 1 h f ---• 1. - 11 7:zogl 1"Nfiii.Ilif ' 4.--- on• .0. a I .Mt a.l \i ` I^•II j I_) '` if_1 1 hh) \ �. 1 I 1 1 IJ `7 \ \ / k1V----=---._. : • . ----,-, 1 illilli '•)--t",i- :a • ,/ ./ ' i I 0•F I ili 11.211 IIIII 7G - 12 \ , , . . . J, �,. 4,1 i1 en , [ 1/43 i Iiil I �ci ti r st � i I la yy ,_ 1 Cr - II 11 1- . .r = ! Malice --1 0. I 1II ., y ii i , ,, _ r cn `" t a • dii ' Il 1 !` tJ8 °f,,' ° ° . I =. I I I'. �t mm1��I°I''1°�°Op,,88'I I I oo T x� II `— r !y v"'O'. L'IV{. Qaq��... !4:c I .I1. r t1 !it • `' 1 "1 t 6,N o !y! / I �y3io,a k ;;�I 2q / e °111111t e i ,ri ■r I I'I (_- 1 t i , .; L. I I • / i II II , II I 11 1 _ m-` Ilcz,=.rra.a-cis t MON �14/ ki:i , N co„ ii I gtill / � pp'• "' �b - �� i � )►, _ , ........... —_ -,- ` '\ � .�� j, . _....„,_ _._ • „..... ____ ......_ _........,__. , , .. _- ._ ____ _ _ __ . _ ________ Imo' ' I MI0111111111 1 M1111IIIII C . 17 G I`( • ,1 11 h 1". 0 s_ ! !;1 iii I f�J rn ? :cll. i Jrr1 ��(2•01, I : a! ,,,111 , • ,J..-, I _•_ \— /\ P4 t ! "Ci .....,, /` < . 1 __,_,___j_ ` 2 1tL tc.. 7 A } , 1 \I 4".•,.•,,,Z.I_____44 A . It 1:11.,[11.,: f,..' i i I I i II : , •''.. . 3lip �% _ ..• ...4 :o ff_- - n\ -� I I,/ / 7- : / i ' 14 it ;., . - .a.• 3s "': _ k 1 — L_ X IJ il Y 'fg '��i e o#l}lr+ ,�l, .' ' ,r�„,,, ;lie €.. 1"---::-44-.., - gifill. ;7*, --"`',„-rliitt. I.6-1§1616*7 DG-7!. .i,..'---4-,,,,,y-..:,.,:i_ , ,I,III: n ,�t�..� 1i 43 _ __o I sxn i..� ! `w ' 11_�I[ time/ Li ! fl 1 . It I e . f� �.Y _, .. 1 t I 01 ii • 1 = _ ■■n'1! r4`i !Litt lit! ' f t t If' gli ", t i 1 • (r�) C7 -.. I ram. _ 1 w ;T+n !;'- -, • •171.:',C..1D '..:.\ Ni‘\ •X\11.<- „,.- Lei - - V y .''! tasty—;� • =fir_ ., 111111 81 1 ti..;::: --— -- -ttill • C iG - /5 R IID Elm Col I 5 113 Off 1 _ f_n 01D iiii: . Dm iv. I Or El ® ■i. ®i® lira1 tEl elm • ®i in aim , _ = ® ® lu .� ® ® ■i. ®'® ii� O ± 1 El Imo 3 ® ® ® ii� ® ElIu V� _ ® ® I ®1®4® iia = ® ® Ill - ® ® Elm _ ®.® III _ ® ® `• r,„,, i® iii ='® ® I u iia V® E • tm ®)® air. < !al ■i. n = ! '`� ® ® iir � § =yta. ® I u j2 ® alb ® ® �ii t l u MCvigil I 3 I .' - i $ _ ®r® lu 73 i , I, i 1 I— - alb i a4 i3 44 i'4; i4; f; _ ®'� i u i is t a -- fl II - f. II _ L . L ` = r --- 1 I 'i I IIA ... IIIMEEEPI 1 l, h 1,1 ,-_-_. El (El 1 (imp, a il ® Si 11 i! I_. ® ® I n ® le ® r-r= I II �'� a � l6 � in 21,3= b [ ® ® In J ® � III in ® C -I®I® In = ® ® In � ®l® i C ®_® i e ®i[® ■i■ L = El ® I u El Ili I El El 1 II®I®isi■ �® ` El El In vi ® Ell-I— L ®1® i Z 0 L - g En Ifs-`•ii■ I= 33;; O '" ® ® ■i■ ®e® ' r ® In Q 1 1 11 [ i pi ® ► n 11 is w o I8 nin • 3 It ii 11 , §; cr u tY c O 0 A z a;e I e n ie e;e e e . a L a e if4s* 13 a 4i �� F4� 0 0 t3 'a; V ad 14; lA a3 /A C 7�- lie I _... , i .. i Ucu it O;.qM 4 N. .Q!.Jm r EI.G Cr ra r1 U H et co (01 0.4' i 1 01......- 01 imam d -D ■d- i[ ;f\ m 3 O.Mine ,y:°: • --I '--3 �__masi [-I.n1 f tIM w _ 1 Q■ a. a 10' L. 1:p!■ 1 Lr IJ:L ■ • ■ I, L,ITr ■ . ■ \ ❑:Ltl o. Y ■ of TE ;" : Di-Fr r,r 8 p;l c r., M o:o N o FM- C 0g ❑; C r 1 r ; r_ ❑ t ,❑ ' -njrlr tttt 171-7-177 c ..- 444 , ;all :0:1 Li ;❑;fLI ;❑:1 I ❑:I el 1 •❑'1 j .0;1 r ! :1-1:1- r :❑;I rl .,❑,I 1:1 'DO ❑r. ❑;I ■ rn u ❑,, ■ z ❑: O o0 n;n li w M c li info C7 . f , r it ri ,onzqi rAll ' i ' 11th...1'111i .iisii ,....., 1,. II.. co t i 0 IL., ,ii1 1....311 ��i i L\ (1 I ft • r I ,Win, `' „„ fir" x• I .r'h"a�' t .f gig t•1.1 Q 4f3 •~ i yf- Ey p w s car til '� It/I . rOr^^ �,YYY v1 Aelo-,. ! 1A -.A • . iii !i ... IJII!!!I4I • .a.yr 7y.,�i:, I v. 'C.i iii eai .2 j j �f fC.:J S: • OJ j E • O. k •t c x! in 0 4 .• \ i: " :; i. n ••F,I.',.-, • P . •'' °•J ;Hail I7 3ht. \ .:._ ...rIlijokliIE l ieii' -(•` , �4:. , '` , .. . _:� it = r (10, .II k t �/ :4 5 i ��' - zi . . d ' r i i i , i ? • . , ' 1>'/./ ii i 1 ,. I V 1. 4. /1//:' . ,I•41 -.: . . 1, 4 1 ot T ; ,.... .1)." i //'' /4' 1... 4,41÷,;/,A ...i I-;///. I ` /i'y/ / /I III �F•I•I.I.,1,.,j<itVT 1l.f/i :41/ - /, ' :: e:.:.r /'/X /// f • , fi ii r: yrti t I {il_ hilt I . Ell C City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Kirkwood Hollow, Phase I, Offset of Fees and Expenses Against Previous Water Improvement Cost Developers of Kirkwood Hollow, Phase I, have requested that $337,799 of development fees and-expenses due to the City for this development be offset against their "Previous Water Improvement Cost". In 1988 the Solana developers, Maguire Partners/IBM, paid $750,000 to the City of Southlake to construct the elevated water tank on Dove Road. They also paid $99,255.40 to extend an 18" water line to serve the area. There was $10,103.50 deducted for water impact fees due from Solana for the initial development. The net result was an $839,151.90 "credit", which was to be amortized upon their connection to and use of the City's water supply. Solana is currently served by the Trophy Club MUD for water and sewer. Section IV-A of the Kirkwood Hollow, Phase I, October 1997 developer agreement allows for the offset of development fees and expenses against the outstanding $839,151.90 "credit". The $337,799 fees and expenses listed in the May 29, 1998 letter from IBM have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works and Community Development staff. Please place this on the July 21 Council agenda for consideration. LAH attachment: May 29, 1998 IBM letter August 31, 1995 City of Southlake letter Section IV-A, Kirkwood Hollow, Phase I, Developers Agreement /De-l p:fizi CC Aviv 300 Convent Street Corporation New Orchard Road (lbw Armonk,NY 10504 May 29, 1998 Ms. Luann Heath City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Kirkwood Hollow, Phase I Dear Ms. Heath: it is our desire to start construction of the referenced project on or about Monday April 6, 1998. In accordance with our Developer Agreement dated October 2, 1997, we are required per section II I (3) to pay all required fees and expenses to the City prior to the start of construction. Based on our final bids, listed below is a summary of the fees and expenses that the Developer and City must agree to as offsets against the City's obligation to Developer for the Previous Water Improvement Cost as described in Article IV A of the Developer Agreement: 1. Street light operation cost for 2 years at $12.50 per fixture per month times 32 fixtures $9,600 (law 2. Development plan and preliminary plat application fee $3,150 3. Final plat filing fee (original) $2,420 4. Final plat filing fee (revised) $2,400 5. Inspection fee $1,260,819 x .03 $37,825 • 3% of Contract cost for water($120,780) • 3% of Contract cost for sewer($286,241 less $53,265 for the upgrade from 8" to 27") • 3% of Contract cost for drainage ($342,686) • 3% of Contract cost for streets, concrete only ($564,377) 6. Administrative processing fee $1,260,819 x .02 $25,216 • 2% of Contract cost for water($120,780) • 2% of Contract cost for sewer($286,241 less $53,265 for the upgrade from 8"to 27") • 2% of Contract cost for drainage ($342,686) • 2% of Contract cost for streets, concrete only($564,377) 7. Sewer and water impact fees at $2,350 per lot times 68 lots $159,800 8. The total cost for the 27" sewer line from the new Kirkwood Branch Pump Station, southwesterly along South Kirkwood Branch Creek to an intersection with Kirkwood Blvd. at a cost of$150,653 will be reimbursed by the City to the Developer. The 8" portion of the line will be an offset $97,388 Total fees and expenses to be offset $337,799 L ioc-a Ms. Luann Heath May 29, 1998 Page 2 Street Access Fees are not able to be offset against the Credit, please see Paragraph IV C of the Developer Agreement for how these fees will be handled. As a result of the above offsets, the remaining Credit outstanding of the Previous Water Improvement Cost is as follows: Current Credit Due $839,151.90 Total Fees and Expenses Offset (337,799.00) Remaining Credit Due $501,352.90 If you are in agreement with the above, please acknowledge your acceptance by signing in the space provided returning one original to me. If you would like to discuss this directly, I can be reached at 914-499-4811. 300 Convent Street Corporation (Iire By: International Business Machines nthony Ca co- Program Manager City of Southlake, Texas By: Title: Date: cc: Curtis Hawk ✓ Robert Whitehead Rex Whitton L /De-3 City of Southlake Duthlak' August 31, 1995 Mayor: Gary Fickes Mayor ProTem: Andrew L.Wambsganss Richard Kuhlman Deputy Mayor ProTem:Pamelak Muller Maguire Thomas Partners 9 Village Circle, Suite 500 Councilmembers: Roanoke, TX 76262 MichaelT.Richarme W.Ralph Evans Sally R.Hall Ronald J.Maness Dear Mr. Kuhlman: City Manager. You have requested a confirmation of the waterprepayment amount (credit) that Curtis E.Hawk q Maguire Thomas Partners (MTP) has with the City of Southlake. In May 1987, Assistant K.YCity verton Manager. the City, MTP, and IBM executed a Utility Contract. Section 5 of this contract Shana K.Yeberton required MTP-IBM to deliver a $750,000 check to the City for prepayment of Secretary:City Sandra L. water. These funds were used bythe City1.5 million gallon L.LeGLeGrand to construct a L elevated water storage tank on N. White Chapel. In addition, Section 7 of that Utility Contract stated that MTP-IBM would contribute 55% toward extending a water line under Highway 114 to a location at the southwest corner of Dove Road and Highway 114. This water line extension was completed in 1988 and MTP-IBM paid $99,255.40 representing their 55% cost participation. In January 1988, IBM and MTP signed a developers agreement for Addition#1 in the City of Southlake. Section III of that developers agreement allowed for Addition#1 water impact fees totaling $10,103.50 be made from the prepayment amount. Therefore, total amounts prepaid are $839,151.90 ($750,000 + $99,255.40 - $10,103.50). If you have further questions, please let me know. Since ly, J urti . Hawk City Manager b:mtpl.wpd 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-5097 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' /,)/1_ Sl exurpf K,t(Kwood 1-�olto W add i lion, . oM NastI, to-2 -q 7 performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151, Tax code, if the tangible property is: a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement;'and b. completely consumed at the job site. 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. N. OTHER ISSUES: A. OFFSET OF FEES AGAINST PREVIOUS DEVELOPER EXPENDITURE: Pursuant to the Developers Agreement dated January 29, 1988, attached herein as Exhibit"D-1",involving the City, the Developer, and/or partners of Developer, the Developer has previously installed City water improvements at a total agreed cost of $839,151.90, hereinafter referred to as Previous Water Improvement Cost. A provision of this Previous Water Improvement Cost was when City water service is made available to the Developer, Developer will receive a discount of 50%off the cost of all water received by Developer from the City, with such discount to be applied against the Previous Water Improvement Cost until the amount is reduced to zero. The City agrees that, in order to reduce the amount of the Previous Water Improvement Cost which would otherwise entitle.Developer to receive City water at discounted rates, the Developer will be allowed, at his/her option, rather than paying cash for any or all of the fees listed under Articles I.G.I.a., I.G.1.b., IT.D.2, IV. D. , N.E. and N.J. herein,to instead offset the amount of any such fees against the Previous Water Improvement Cost, and the amount of the Previous Water Improvement Cost will be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by the amount of any fees which Developer elects to so offset. Exhibit "D" attached hereto provides an estimate of the total fees projected to be taken as offset against the Previous Water Improvement Cost in connection with the Development of the Addition. • B. PARKLAND DEDICATION: L -11- 07/13/9$ 14:12 FAX 512 44S 7064 PRIG STIMMIES. INC. 2/003 COIP Lire Air Texas Department of Transportation o€wiTr C.GREER STATE HIGH et.•i 2S E 11TH STREET•Al1STtr,TEXTS 78701-248s•0121413.6566 July 9, 1998 Subject: September 24,1998 Cam aces Meeting-METROPORT Cities The Honorable Rick Stacy Mayor,City of Southlake do Prime Strategies,Inc. - 1508 S.LamarBlv'd Austin,Tx 78704 Dear Mayor Stacy. Thank you for your request to make a presentation before the Texas Transportation Commission to discuss the items specified in your petition.This letter is to confirm that your delegation is scheduled to appear before the commission at its September 24, 1998 meeting. The commission meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Main Hearing Room on the first floor of the Dewitt C. Greer Building. 125 E. 11 th Street in Austin_ Delegationappearances begin shortly after the meeting convenes, however, you will be contacted approximately two weeks prior to the meeting regarding the exact time of your delegations appearance. Mr.Steve Simmons and the Fort Worth District staff are available to assist you in preparing for this meeting and can answer any questions you might have concerning your presentation. Please 00ntact the Fort Worth District at(817)370-6500 for assistance.A delegation appearance summary is attached for your information. Sincerely, Michael W.Behrens, P.E. Assistant Executive Director Engineering Operations Attachment cc: Mr. David M.Laney Ms.Anne S.Wynne Mr. Robert L.Nichols Mr. Charles W. Heald Mr. Stove Simmons Mr. Jay Nelson Mr.Alvin Luedecke,Attu: Dan Mings Mr. Tom Newbern,Attn: Brenda Kalapach L An Equal Opportunity Employer /! 4-/ 07/13/98 11:13 FAS 512 115 7061 STEGIES. INC. 003/003 • a DELEGATION APPEARANCE PROCEDURE Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) For your delegation, these steps have occurred: • The delegation submitted a petition(a written request)to the district engineer in the applicable district office. • The TxDOT district submitted the petition to the executive director of TaDOT. • TzDOT notified any identified opponents of the delegation request and asked if the opponents desired to.appear before the commission. • TiDOT scheduled the delegation appearance and notified the delegation and opposition, if any,by letter and sent a copy to the district office. Next Steps: (kr' • Prior to the Commission meeting date,the delegation will be advised of the exact delegation appearance order and the approximate time schedule for each appearance. • The delegation may contact the TxDOT Engineering Operations Office,512/305-9526, for assistance with any type of visual aid,such as a slide projector,VCR,etc. • No less than 14 days prior to the appearance date,the delegation will fwrnish 15 copies of any written material supporting the presentation to Michael Behrens,Assistant Executive Director,Engineering Operations, 125 East 11 ,Austin,Texas 78701. • On the day of the Commission meeting,the delegation and opponents(if any)will appear at the Main Hearing Room on the first floor of the Dewitt C. Greer Building, 125 East le Street in.Austin(corner of 11"and Brazos)to make a presentation according to the following guidelines: • A presentation is limited to a maximum of 20 minutes. • No more than three persons may speak for a delegation or for an opponent. • An opponents' presentation,whether by one or more opponents,is limited to a total of 20 minutes after the delegation completes its presentation. • The opponents' presentation is limited to the same subjects/requests as those of the delegation. //,Q- ; City of South lake uthlak Administrative Offices MayorFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JULY 14, 1998 Rids Stacy Contact Tracy Southers Mayor Pro Tern: Public Information Officer W.Ralph Evans (817)481-5581 ext. 819 Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: Scott F.Martin Counciknernbera: PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON FM 1938 EXTENSION Wayne Moffat Ronnie Kendall Debra Edmondson Gary Pawl's SOLTTHLAKE,Texas--The City of Southlake,City of Keller,Town of City Manager: Westlake,and Tarrant CountyPrecinct#3 CommissionerGlen Whitleywill host a Ha Curtis E. Hawk Assistant City Manager: public meeting to discuss the extension of F.M. 1938 (David Boulevard/Randol CS na::ehferton Mill/Precinct Line Road) from F.M. 1709(Southlake Boulevard)to State ra L.teGrand Highway 114.The meeting is scheduled for July 22,6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.,at the Solana Education Center. Residents of Southlake, Keller, and Westlake are encouraged to attend this meeting in which the proposed alignment of the new roadway and typical cross sections will be presented. ### L 1725 East Southlake l n uthlake,Texas 76092 (817)481-551 // /4-1317)329-1747 aiv Eeu ec -----__. -EMPLOYER' I. 11 fd If, 515-•V, ". r. Ati �jv lAr, j7 4A r. 1. L. y. r. tea. �J Al 119* V*A V Lit a it in q: J Ad it 35W, I M141 �j mow -A� '-v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'h R A fRl .... ;r,si? s'` a•s� _ ',+i��• `�r�„�kitar,,,s,�r\\: ).,1 , VOW W ion Regarding SH 114.. FM 1938 & US 377 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead,Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Implementation of Drought Contingency Plan The attached Ordinance 662, Water Conservation Policy and Drought Contingency Plan provides for certain actions to be implemented based upon a percentage of water used vs. the production capacity of the system for five consecutive days. Because of the 5 Million Gallon Ground Water Storage Tank, Pump Station No. 1, the water system is able to produce or pump from Fort Worth a sustained capacity of 12.5 million gallons per day(MGD). The plan provides the follow trigger conditions: • Mild Conditions Daily water demand exceeds 70%of production capacity for five consecutive days. [70%x 12.5 MGD=8.75 MGD] L • Moderate Conditions 80%of production capacity for five consecutive days. [80%x 12.5 MG= 10.0 MGD] • Severe Conditions Daily water demand exceeds 90%of production capacity of five consecutive days. [90%x 12.5 MGD= 11.25 MDG] On June 30, 1998, the Mild Condition drought contingency measures were implemented. This condition requires public notification and a voluntary lawn watering schedule. Notices to the media were sent and an odd-even day voluntary lawn watering scheduled was publicized. The five days prior to June 30th exceeded 8.75 MGD and actually averaged 10.17 MGD. Historically in Southlake, Mondays and Tuesdays are the peak days for water consumption. In June, the following weekly averages of water consumption were: Date Amount Class June 1-7 6.01 MGD June 8-14 5.44 MGD June 15-21 7.49 MGD June 22-28 9.72 MGD June 29 11.20 MGD C 11 C-1 CURTIS E.HAWK ORDINANCE 662 DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN JULY 17, 1998 PAGE 2 (ire The week following the voluntary lawn water restriction did not result in a drop in consumption. June and July daily pump summaries are attached. Date Amount Class June 29—July 5 9.97 MGD July 6—July 12 10.85 MGD July 10 ' 13.5 MGD July 13 2 12.75 MGD 'Record High 2 Five consecutive days above 10.00 MGD Therefore, Monday, July 13, 1998, the Moderate Conditions drought contingency measures were implemented. The Moderation Condition actions include: • Mandatory lawn watering time schedule which is allowing lawn watering only a) from 4:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. b) odd-numbered street addresses may water on odd-numbered dates, and even-numbered street addresses on even dates. • Prohibited water use activities are: a) outside washing (cars, windows, and pavement) except only with a bucket. However, commercial car washes may continue operation as they recycle the wash water. b) street washing c) water hydrant flushing d) complete filling of new or repaired swimming pools e) athletic field watering (golf course) The Staff has contacted all the Homeowner Associations (HOAs), SPIN representatives, issued media releases, called and met with commercial and large irrigation users, answered hundreds of telephone calls, knocked on doors and handed out the news release, and starting on Wednesday evening to turn off violating irrigation only meters. A notice of the moderate condition order was published in the Hometown Star on Wednesday, July 15, 1998. Several issues have surfaced upon the implementation of the plan. • New Lawns We are allowing the watering of new lawns as follows: a) scheduled hours on the correct day b) off-day once during the non-peak hours as directed by Utilities Superintendent Lbw 11 C-2 CURTIS E.HAWK ORDINANCE 662 DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN JULY 17, 1998 PAGE 3 • Limited Water Times or Residents on Vacation Utilities Superintendent is working with individuals to allow every other day watering. • Pools Building Inspections and Utility Superintendent are developing a plan for the filling of pools permitted prior to the prohibition. This plan will be available for Council on Tuesday, July 21 St. The Moderate Condition plan is starting to have an impact. As the following daily pumping shows: Date Amount Class July 13 12.750 MGD July 14 11.163 MGD July 15 10.133 MGD Staff will have more information on results and prepared to discuss issues with Council. BW/ls Attachments: Ordinance 662 June and July Daily Water Usage Reports M:\W D-FILES\W ATER\Ord.662\071698-implement.doc L 11 C-3 JUNE FORT WORTH PUMP STATION#1 . T.W KING TOTAL, ',-- .. 1 13,990,000 7,523,000 3,000 7,526,000( N 2 14,320,000 8,316,000 6,000 8,322,000 me 3 13,370,000 8,050,000 5,000 8,055,000 4 10,030,000 5,707,000 2,000 5,709,000 ,6 5 5,430,000 3,506,000 2,000 3,508,000 6 5,940,000 4,568,000 3,000 4,571,000 7 6,930,000 4,377,000 4,000 4,381,000 8 8,640,000 5,723,000 3,000 5,726,000 u' 9 10,420,000 6,406,000 3,000 6,409,000 10 9,110,000 5,611,000 2,000 5,613,000 11 5,200,000 3,475,000 2,000 3,477,000 12 8,010,000 5,906,000 4,000 5,910,000 13 6,040,000 3,869,000 6,000 3,875,000 14 11,960,000 7,038,000 6,000 7,044,000 '` 15 12,170,000 6,700,000 4,000 6,704,000 r'' 16 11,810,000 6,949,000 4,000 .6,953.000 17 13,130,000 7,754,000 3,000 7,757,000 18 11,920,000 6,530,000 6,000 6,536,000 19 14,370,000 8,218,000 4,000 8,222,000 20 15,540,000 8,316,000 4,000 8,320,000 21 14,780,000 7,936,000 7,000 7,943,000 22 15,600,000 8,092,000 5,000 8,097,000 t'' 23 18,000,000 11,119,000 4,000 11,123,000 24 17,350,000 9,159,000 8,000 9,167,000 25 17,780,000 9,569,000 5,000 9,574,000 Co." 26 18,860,000 9,255,000 15,000 9,270,000 27 18,970,000 10,871,000 11,000 10,882,000 28 19,350,000 9,942,000 4,000 9,946,000 r' 29 21,060,000 11,192,000 8,000 11,200,000 :' 30 18,600,000 9,979,000 8,000 9,987,000 31 0 388,680,000 221,656,000 151,000 . 221,807,000 " TOTAL-USAGE " , 221,507,000'_4. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DAILY WATER USAGE 1oo,000,000 JUNE 1998 10,000,000 1,000,000 z 100,000 - -PUMP STATION#1 10,000 - � ' ImCilmT.W.KING 100 _ . 10 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAY OF MONTH L 11C-4 ' FROM : SOUTHLAKE PUBLIC WORKS PHONE NO. : 8174215 Jul. 16 1998 09:00AM P2 JULY L .(:rP?. " 77'7 i :S :.Tl '' ._. m Y xiRmuL=':c p.-;u , n 8:'z_V 1 ' 20,270,000 10,708,000 �' 11,000 10,719,000 2 19,070,000 10,592,000 4,000 10,596,000 3 15,470,000 8,268,000 13,000 8,281,000 4 16,850,000 9,668,000 3,000 9,671,000 5 17,270,000 9,323,000 7,000 9,330,000 6 19,740,000 10,658,000 10,000 10,668,000 " 7 18,610,000 10,493,000 7,000 10,500,000 8 20,380,000 10,720,000 9,000 10,729,000 9 20,190,000 9,596,000 9,000 9,605,000 10 24,170,000 13,517,000 6,000 13,523,000 4 11 19,590,000 10,698,000 12,000 10,710,000 12 19,860,000 10,193,000 10,000 10,203,000 13 22,620,000 12,742,000 8,000 12,750,000 ^ 14 16,790,000 11,154,D00 9,000 11,163,000 15 17,560,000 Iiiiiip10,126,000 7,000 10,133,000 16 0 17 0 18 0 19 0 20 0 21 0 22 0 23 0 24 0 25 0 (or zs - ° 27 ° 28 0 29 0 3311 0 ?'+= 'viu -r' ,-, [ _..i" ? .cc'—„ "" 4 LLF ,mot .it -.2'‘_ -'4''' ,n -'4'-'1_ t_... ; .fr� h„. � _ _ " _ _ -,,, a t, _ .ice- „ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DAILY WATER USAGE JULY 1998 100, o ,o _ , ,, .. .-.,.�.� -.—L. 1 --- - -- _ ; "-ram 1,000.000 x ,. __ O100,000 ;K,... " 1 n--.. z;. rW " tF'UMRI8iA1 1#1 ` 1A,000 : r _11 ■ ■ ■ ,!-■�■ .■ <* =' , 0 .T.W.KING s 'eG r -+ r " `�"=w F -tee `°�'.—..rN �� z=— 10 a "' —m s • • 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAY OF MONTH 11C-5 ORDINANCE NO. 662 (re .AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ESTABLISHING A YEAR-ROUND WATER CONSERVATION POLICY AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN TO REDUCE PEAK WATER USAGE TO ENSURE THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF SOUTHLAKE CITIZENS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE PLAN; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt a Water Conservation Policy and Drought Contingency Plan which provides for the reduction of water usage by customers of the Southlake water system and the implementation of emergency measures to reduce the demand upon the Southlake water system during drought conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the adoption of the attached Water Conservation Policy and Drought Contingency Plan is necessary in order to promote and preserve fire safety, and public health and sanitation. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAL1iED BY THE CITY COU NCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS; SECTION 1. The City of Southlake hereby adopts a Water Conservation Policy and Drought Contingency Plan, (the "Plan"), and a public education and information action plan for the dissemination of information concerning the Water Conservation Policy and Drought Contingency Plan for the encouragement of conservation, all as contained in Attachment "A", attached hereto and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The city manager is hereby authorized to declare the existence of the trigger conditions for mild and moderate conditions, as detailed in the Plan, to initiate the measures prescribed for such conditions, and to terminate the conditions when the emergency has ended. Further, the mayor is hereby authorized to declare the existence of the trigger conditions for sever conditions and critical emergency conditions, as detailed in the Plan, and to initiate the appropriate actions prescribed for such conditions, and to terminate the conditions when the emergency has ended. CC:\WPWtN60\WPDOCVWATER\ORD662\DROCGHT.WPD Page i 11Ci-6 SECTION 3. When the city manager or the mayor has made a determination that the conditions of a water emergency exist, the city manager or mayor may order that the emergency measures set forth in the ?lan be implemented. To be effective, the order must be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city within twenty-four(24) hours. SECTION 4. A person commits an offense if he makes, causes or permits a use of water contrary to the measures implemented by the city manager as prescribed in the Plan. For purposes of this section, it is presumed that a person has made, caused or permitted a use of water contrary to the measures implemented if the mandatory measures have been formally ordered consistent with the Plan and: (1) The manner of use has been prohibited by the Plan; or (2) The amount of water used exceeds that allowed by the Plan. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, Lentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,clauses,sentences,paragraphs and sections of this incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 7. • Any person,firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 662 or any other ordinances affecting which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. LAWPWIN60\WPDOCS\WATER\ORD662\DROUGHT.WPD: Page 2 11 C-7 SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten ( l0) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within then days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law,and it is so ordained. ASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS 40 DAY OF , 1996. ae#,A.e40. O1.AKEiii p,,' MA �0 Tom; ATTEST: gr Y14(1-i-41J TY SECRETARY SSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS G DAY OF , 1996. • ,0NLAKE ,. N OR 4.**\?P'= ATTEST: % 4i 4Ah4iii au/a} ECRETARY CC:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\WATER\ORD662'DROUGHT.WPD Page 11 C-8 ECTIVE: / 9 EFF J APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY • C • Co:\WPWTN6OWPDOCS\WATER\ORD662DR0UGHT.WPD Page 4 11C-9 • ATTACHMENT "A" WATER CONSERVATION POLICY A. Education and lnformatiort The City will promote water conservation by informing the public of methods to conserve water. The overall public education will be divided into three segments: a first-year program, a long-term program, and a new customer program. Information presented in Appendix B will be the basis for public education as well as pre-printed brochures available through the Texas Water Development Board, the American Water Works Association, and other appropriate sources. First-Year Program The first-year program will include the distribution of educational materials including brochures and/or newsletters to all customers four times (once each quarter). The first information to be distributed will explain the water conservation program. This initial distribution will be accompanied by a newspaper feature article. Subsequent news releases during the first year will correspond to information distribution times and at other times if conditions warrant. The educational materials and news releases will promote water conservation by informing water users about ways to save water inside homes, in landscaping and lawn uses, and in recreational uses. The water conservation methods to be emphasized by the City will include: • Bathroom water saving hints • Kitchen water saving hints • Laundry water saving hints • Appliance and plumbing practices • • Outdoor water conservation The water conservation plan will be distributed to water users by mail. In addition to newspaper articles and broadcast on the City's cable channel,other means of communication will be considered (such as posters and public displays) if conditions warrant. Long-Term Program The long-term program will include semi-annual distribution of educational materials and news releases corresponding to peak summer and winter demand periods. The news releases will be used to provide information on water conserving practices, encourage water conservation and report progress on achieving the City's water conservation goal. Additionally, water conservation will be stressed during visits at area schools when the City participates in National Public Works Week in late Spring. Other news releases may be ( ,:\WPWC46O\WPDOCS\WATE .\ORD662DROUGHT.WPD Page 5 11C-10 used if conditions warrant. New Customer Program New customers will receive the initial conservation education material that describes the conservation program and other general conservation information when they apply for service. These customers will then be included in the first-year or long-term as appropriate. B. Water Conserving Landscaping In order to reduce the demands placed on a water system by landscape watering, the City, through its respective education and information programs, shall encourage customers and local landscaping companies and irrigation practices by the following methods: 1. Encourage home owners and landscape architects/contractors to use low water plants and grasses and efficient irrigation systems. 2. Request public organizations and commercial establishments to discontinue irrigation practices between the hours of 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. 3. Encourage irrigation contractors and commercial establishments to use drip irrigation systems when possible and to design all irrigation systems with water conservation features, such as large drop rather than fine mist sprinklers. 4. Encourage local nurseries and other businesses to offer adapted, low water using plants and grasses and efficient landscape watering devices. C. Leak Detection and Repair The City will continue its ongoing leak detection, location and repair programs. Waterline leaks are detected by utility personnel while reading meters, maintaining their water and wastewater systems, and while performing other routine surveillance programs. Additionally,water audits shall be utilized to determine if leaks exist which have gone undetected. D. Implementation and Enforcement Generally, the City will provide overall guidance and assistance to the customer in the implementation of this plan. Specifically,the City will provide public education/information services to the customer and be responsible for the submission of an annual report to the Texas Water Development Board which will include the following information: 1. Progress made in the implementation of the program. 2. Public information which has been distributed. 3. Public response to the program. 4. Effectiveness of the program. \WPWIN6O WPDOCS\WATER'.ORD662\DROUGHT.WPD Page 6 11C-11 The City shall be responsible for the implementation and enforcement of the specific water conserving activities contained within the Plan and for reporting an evaluation to the Texas Water Development Board on the effectiveness of the program. This implementation and enforcement will be in accordance with the respective ordinances or resolutions as adopted by the City. DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN A. Trigger Conditions The initiation of drought contingency measures by the City of Southlake must inherently be determined on a case-by-case basis with consideration given to weather conditions, time of year, prevailing system capacities,and prevailing contractual arrangements with supplier(s). The City shall utilize the following trigger conditions in conjunction with other utility specific, real time factors to initiate drought contingency measures: 1. Mild Conditions - Daily water demand reaches or exceeds 70% of the production capacity of the system for 5 consecutive days. Declaration made by City Manager. 2. Moderate Conditions - Daily water demand reaches or exceeds 80% of the production capacity of the system for 5 consecutive days. Declaration made by City Manager. 3. Severe Conditions-Daily water demand reaches or exceeds 90%of the production capacity of the system for 5 consecutive days; or the imminent or actual failure of a major component of the system is experienced which can cause an immediate health or safety hazard. Declaration made by the Mayor. 4. Critical Emergency Condition- Due to natural or other disaster, the water supply is not dependable and may not be suitable for human consumption. Declaration made • by the Mayor. • B. Drought Contingency Measures Based upon the prevailing conditions,the City shall take some or all of the following actions, as appropriate, when trigger conditions are reached. 1. Mild Conditions a. Inform the public through the news media that a trigger condition has been reached,and that the public should look for ways to voluntarily reduce water use and provide specific steps which can be taken. b. Notify major commercial water users of the situation and request voluntary use reductions. ( I:\WPWtN6O\WPDOCS\WATER\ORD662\DROUGHT.WPD Page 7 11C-12 c. Publicize a voluntary lawn watering time schedule. d. During winter months request water users to insulate pipes rather than running water to prevent pipes from freezing. L '7 Moderate Conditions a. Continue current actions initiated in the preceding phase. b. Car washing (except for commercial washes), window washing, and pavement washing shall be prohibited except when only a bucket is used. c. The following public water uses, not essential for public health or safety, shall be prohibited: 1. Street washing. 2. Water hydrant flushing. 3. Complete filling of new or repaired swimming pools. 4. Athletic field watering (golf course). d. A mandatory lawn watering time schedule shall be imposed. The following schedule is recommended for implementation,however,an alternate schedule may be used if it is found to be more effective. Customers with odd-numbered street addresses may water on odd-numbered (.. days and customers with even-numbered street addresses may water on�,, even- numbered days. Watering shall be permitted only between the hours of 4:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 3. Severe Conditions a. Continue all current actions initiated in the preceding phases. b. All outdoor water use, not essential for public health or safety, shall be prohibited. c. Based upon prevailing conditions, establish maximum water use limits for commercial and residential users, and establish monetary fines or surcharges to be levied for exceeding water use limits. 4. Critical Conditions a. All uses of the public water supply will be banned except in cases of emergency or fire suppression. b. In this condition water use will be limited, and water should be boiled prior .C WPWN6d1WPDOCSIWATER'ORD662\DROUGHT.WPD Page 8 11C-13 zi to use (other than fire suppression)to ensure purity. C. Information and Education . Ce The purpose of drought contingency measures as a part of this Plan will be conveyed to the public as part of and in the same manner as the Water Conservation Plan. When trigger conditions appear to be approaching, the public will be informed through local newspaper articles and/or radio/television broadcasts. Throughout the period of a trigger condition, regular articles broadcasts will be used to inform the public of the current condition and conservation measures for the condition. D. Termination of Trigger Conditions As drought or emergency conditions lessen,a determination will be made when a particular drought condition no longer exists. Upon such determination,the drought measures for and enforcement of that particular drought condition shall terminate. The public will be notified of the termination of any or all drought conditions and related drought measures in the same manner as described in C above. E. Implementation and Enforcement The Drought Contingency Plan shall be implemented and enforced by ordinance or resolution of the City of Southlake. G. Update of Trigger Conditions Annually,or upon any significant change in water supply or production capability the City shall review the water system capabilities in order to determine actual trigger conditions based upon the guidelines described in Section III. A. of this Plan. WPWN6OWPDOCS\WATERORD662DROUGHT.WPO Page 9 aie, • 11C-14 ATTACHMENT "B" Action Plan on Education and Information (re The public education process will consist of the following programs: 1. A pamphlet ("Homeowners Guide to Water Use and Water Conservation")will be distributed by mail using preprinted labels at a date yet to be decided. The pamphlets are made available to us free from the Texas Water Development Board. A press release will run both the week before the distribution and the week of the distribution to make readers aware that the pamphlet is being mailed out. 2. Water saving tips will be included, on a quarterly basis, in the monthly city newsletter. Additionally,these water saving tips will be broadcast periodically,year round,on the City cable channel. 3. A summary of information from the various pamphlets will be included in a packet/pamphlet, provided by the Public Works Department, and given to residential customers when they open a new account. 4. Water conservation information and educational materials will be provided for the Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN)meetings. SPIN members will then be fundamental in the dissemination of water conserving practices through out the community. 5. Water conservation information and educational materials will be provided at local elementary schools during presentations by the Public Works Department during the City's annual participation in National Public Works Week. (This event is usually scheduled in May). • C:\W P W M60\W PDOCS\WATER\ORD662\DROUGHT.W PD (rao, C:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\WATER\ORD662\DROUGHT.WPD Paei0 11C-15 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM July 16, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Project Priorities for Community Development Attached please find a graphic representation showing our anticipated schedule for pursuing various projects as outlined in the prioritization exercise. I have attempted to allocate various staff in an attempt to "fast track" as many projects as possible. We will discuss at the Council meeting any desired modifications to this schedule. Feel free to contact me or Karen Gandy should you have any questions. GL/gl enc. Community Development Department- Scheduled Priorities (form date 7-17-98) L:\COMDEV\WP-FlLES\PROIECTS\PRIORITY\CC-CEH6.WPD , .................... ..... ............. ... .............. .. ............... ... ............... c) n r) C) t7 r) c) n n c') r) r) -0 < : (itii ' ... o F. ::: :::: $ n J O OOO •wi cs A A A W v q n o q o o > d o o cc St N C) N N N N �? o g 0 c y• o o c w 8 o co, 8 = o0 • • _ _ o ? 00 00 0 o"ao 00 °= c no o 00 ao w' o°o O n � ; O O " �; - o O `< .°. O O o 0 O O n ' o • O m' ., 5 3 a a o' a a 3 a a s a a ". 5 5' = 5" 5 0 w 5 a 5' 0 5 B' =' 3 N n o p n cD Ft, g n c, .p e� c, n C n N C) N n a a N N co C N CD 0 u c, o co D. .p �< A to Q o A H A a s cc m• cn c y `< > o• o fD 00 z O 7,' to P c•• bc a _ o D oo07c n • .-m ' n o n . co o n on O ' s O cn aA V < a N y o - o c acoy _ <: C o amti n� o c, 0. w ' ::::z =a r fD CD c co _ ,s d < g 0 5 -0 0 „ n>. C N. A '� R. v cD a�o.y d < w C7 B ",' ,' o n O CA 'n W_ Oa n 5' 4 O F n' a y 0 an O y CcD ) CA tr ccn Y a. (1.:7 z > z > X > X > X > X > x > x > X/ > X > x > X > z > CD : ° CDb CD mg CDmg CDb CD mg CD mg CDmg :CD mg CD 13< - < - < - < - < . < - VI co o C) G) a a -0 n : d °' n =' n A9 SR N�.. n —. a it n �::<:>:::z>::::>: Q, 5N �' II . .....::.: 5 0 �' II b o C G N N ::;::.:......QD::: 0 �� Q > > c n n N ,::::::: Ci 0 vs .0f� N :::>:::::<:>>:>:<: vo :»::::::>::::>>::::> 00 .:::::::.:::::::::: .. .::. . ......:: c) N N N ZS' x:i:::::::::: A1 n nnti c }4 `C) ? t I D-D, r OV J W Nea > .: N �O .., a3c 30 0 : n n n n n n n n n n n `<< i:: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • O O r, G 7 n C n z a • o n E 3 3 Fcr 9. ' o c (D (D a .. — .y .�,macc. O IJ N ..~L':: sv +ems.' N N �^ 9 C7 cr w :' :. Cr, o o it II y i I.A NI n 7) r CA -3 N N n cn cn N N 3 n II < Q. .' CDD (OD O 2 � d d C C = 3 n a5. n y DC rn O O y, O O — s y 2 g O < . . co = o n. a • N r !: a 0.. O O ono 0 -C. •�' . y y. 0 :: ::': (v o i N o O m co Vl .,rt::iii: R 6. ':': ;:;':;i>: p �° .- (D .�., R. 3 0• _ -:::p:::;: . .:tICY##>::: u, cn n w m _ ......, as _ = 3 co U o � . R 7 :::•. :i:?:: O Fo O< s II :Q:::;::: 'iif:3 n. 7 �C° E. n 3 co :.m.. C e m >: a xp.>:» w..n v : :.::s:: iii..wt":::R'ti i i(pi' iiiiR$ii: n :€:€:r> > > C > > > > > > > ti . I : II1IiI1I1I1 y07 n n n n -, n n n n n T. -.' C '::C C C = c C C w = ::4 ::i- 0 CCcn CC • = ` ::3:C C O O (D C -I (: C .::: ;:= 7 ::::Q.::::: 3 3 C ..., CD C C w ':::. :::.:: .....a O ..,, A i:::1.1::::.* co ii::w>::i:: a m s 6 + a N d J W C S C ✓ c -o a ....................:::::::::::: _..,::::,.::,;,!.,m L. „.........„:„..........:::::,.,..a,i... ,:...:.,:.:::iiii......i.......„.....:., N ...................... :::.:...:...:...::::im.. ......,......„.„.....:......:......„ ,.„....„„.. ........... ........... ........... .......,...,...... .......•..• ........... ........... ..,.....„„.... ....:::::::::....i.:..".:.:::::::.......:!..•............:": ........... .w.,.............. ........... ........................,...........„..........:.....:1:...............„:„.: ...._..... ,................... ................... m,.......,.....iii::::::. ...................... ••••••••••• ........... iiiiiiiiiiii ........... ........... ........... _......... .........„...„....„.... ••••••••••• 1 1 D-3 - _ City of Southlake,Texas (hile MEMORANDUM July 17, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Workgroup Sign-Up Sheet Attached please find a Workgroup Sign-Up Sheet for Council members, Commissioners and Board members . The left-hand column lists Council's priority ranking of proposed ordinance revisions and plan updates. As we have done previously since implementing the workgroup process, each member of the Council,P&Z, and Board of Adjustment is given the opportunity to work with other elected or appointed representatives and staff in small groups to systematically accomplish the priorities. Since their inception, the workgroups have improved communication between the Commission and Council and have accelerated the drafting process by: • better defining"what's broken," • brainstorming possible solutions, • "hammering out" the details, and • reaching a consensus early in the process. These efforts have significantly reduced the amount of time spent on ordinance and plan revisions during the public meetings. I would like to thank each member in advance for their participation and extra effort in this process. Any questions regarding the above, please call me at (817) 481-5581, extension 743. KPG L:\COMDEV\WP-FILESPROJECTS\WORKGRP\GEN_MEMO.3 1 ( �-1 Ge J0.1 r O d0 'L: C .0 C i N •en ON 00s EE0,1 - 5 Z a t 0 L' x ..,. o . .. 0 U U . , . m r- ry v m n en c) v en v ,0 en en X. .... en en en C x k K Tr x r x x Tr x 00ie x �e Tr Tr O 00 = x x x x x x x x op a) d •O 'G t 'q L 1 'C 'o 'O C 0 '. CG ii en 4 3 c C7 q C ° 0 0a) Ra W U U Rl T O o qq= o°'n E sa zS a m C Ce a � °O v a C = a v, U. ' oz er ' C d.a v o g 8 to (11100)1 "0 cp an Q .r M '$d� ScnCNO1t ! UIIILII1 y ° _ a0 cn NUU 0 — UA 1z (We ? \ co X § 3 / ) C 00 o so k c at § ■ - -- 1 2 k ® = In _ . 2 % % / O G g al . k § 11 11 0 2 } 0 f j \ § Tr rn§ _ Tr • . § % §en Tr \( I= 0 } 0 i �} ) Cl) '-' \ ) k / ) e C 77.: \ § i ill ) I $ �_`f f . — / ; ) k , ) ) a k .0 e▪ $ 0 2 R. . w CP' d.) llu! iU ! \E 07 3a I -§ ' §f N/ 2 N a. \ ƒ) ] ] / I1 E-3 ICIV � � l 75 4 'tic 1 ,, �--- --- - -- w, .:'1 �G-+:��� +� • �+ �% ; i!�i 'v � �''� 1 � �/, : �T � � J i Gj..�.. G L� i��E 1 !ti L� � �^ �� cz i �•: i- r :► �� ��- co a l �E�T �OUTHL�KE �L/D NORTH, LOT 1, STOW -BRIDGE PARK, CABINET A, SLIDE 34a8 L.U.0.0 WITAIL/COMMERCIAL- 100 YEAR FLOOD PL A I N EXISTING ZONING: 5P-2 25' GONGRE w TAP IN 4" 56ER EXTENC EXI5TING 6" 5EWER LINE t T OWNER: REALTY CAPITAL GROUP 0' LOT 2, BI»OGK 1, STONEBRiDOE PARK ; i CABINET A, SLIDE 4153 ` L.U.D.= RETAIL/COMMERCIAL- / % MECHANICAL UNITS WILL BE SCREENED PER ♦ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN `C ZONING ORDINANCE 4W, SECTION 43.1 clb. EXI5TINia ZONING: 5P-2 ,� ♦ �`LOT 4, J,G. ALLEN, NO, 18 ADDITION ♦ �! �` L.U.D.- RETAIL COMMERCIAL ♦ / �' �� ti OMER-. JIM MARTIN <po EX15TIWv ZONING: C-3 ` 2 f PROPOSED. RETAIL COMMERCIAL 0 / / �f/ ' _ BRICK SCREEN DUMPS /'� � TER 8'-0" / /'�`f / WALL5 TO MAT CH BLD6. F * //�� LIGHT WALL �7 p �� `zo, " >r / LI T WALL PACK L. e' fr — / CONCRETE WALK :4 / q, ?4' „ Y'Vlel�j 54 LOT 4, J.G. ALLEN, NO. 18 ADDITION HC - / 4 / L.U.D.- RETAIL COMMERCIAL ry ru OWNER: JIM MARTIN (A l EX15TING ZONING: 0-3 PROP05ED: COMMERCIAL 24' CONCRETE DRIVEO TRAFFIC FLOW n 50'-0" FRONT BUILDIN& LI 52'-10 / ! (10 / 9'- EAG = 9 -0" 10 O / i ST N6f L 7 7 ;p/ f N'rDR1 AN S. 50 30,32" W. i'16.0' 1 6CITY GONG. ►NALK �XI TIN6 CURB CUT --r- APPROX. 353'-8" TO CENTERLINE OF NEAREST DRIVE/ENTRANCE APPROX. 456 -4" TO CENTERLINE OF RANDOL MILL AVE. VNEST SOUTHLAKE 5L'VrD- — -- (130_ WIDTH) OWNER: DKV PARTNERS LOT-5R4-RI, PARKER'5 CORNER CASIMT A, SLIDE 3145 L.UD.9100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 1 L z� NORTH SCALE; 1 "= 20'-0" a 4 9 IL m ro Q 00 00 ao o Q tJC O uj 1EIIJ.. to U c�1 0' w H LsJ O. • 25' C ONGR7/7 S / ZZ tip7 GONGRETE VIALK ' / 25' cowRETE OR+VE — — — — — — _ — _ — - — 50'-C" r-RONT BUILDfNG LIB- _ WEST 50UTHLAE �L'✓�. F.M.#I-7Ol� 25 50 v 10C NOi-RTH, SCALE: I"=24'-O"I N V u� I, _ J J ;w iry 1 � / I 1 / fI 1 l I r f %I 1 1 RR I C--7A 110N 5G#4 t�UL G 1.5" TAP d WATER METER - PROVIDED BY ONMIER �►.� 1.5" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE - PROVIDED 4 INSTALLEa.k BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR D tS► iRRiTROL 1.5" ELECTRIC VALVE 216 - APR RAINBiRD 514" QUICK COUPLER JRG Y' HARDIE XL ROTOR W/ #1 NOZZEL ! HARDIE H54 SPRAY HEAD W/ HSN-15H/Q HARDIE HSi2 SPRAY HEAD W/ HSN-12H/O • HARDIE H512 SPRAY HEAD VV HSN-qH/O ED TORO 5"70-4P W/ 4' 55T-EST TORO 5"70-12P W/ 4' 55T-E5T �,.1.5" PVC MAINLINE CLA35 200 - 5DR 21 PVC LATERAL LINE 51ZE A5 5HOY4N lRRlr=7A710N NOTES: 1. PLANS 'C>IA&"MATIC IN NATME - PLACE MAIN LINE, LATERAL LINE .IN SAME TRENCH WHERE APPLICABLE. PLACE ALL MAINLINE 4 VALVES IN511:>E PROPERTY LI!Z. 2 LER LOrAT10NS:APPP-OX- MATE 4 5U5JEG TO CRHOALNGE- VERIFY ON 5 TTE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR RE510O>N515LE FOR LOCATING d MARKING EXISTING UT#CITIES. 4, PROVIDE FOLLOWING AT CONTROLLER; (A)KNI-CLIK FREEZE SENSOR -MODEL 4D1 (5)MINI-CLIK RAIN SENSOR (C) IRRITOL SA-120 SURGE ARRE5TOR S. LoOATE HEADS 3" OFF B.O.C. _ 6.5 PRQNIDEIJ BY OMER AS NOTED ON PLAN5, AT ON CONTRACTOR SHALL BORE UNDER EX15+TIN6 N1ALK5 AS REOUIRED. 1. ELECTRICAL POY4ER TO CONTROLLER PROVIDED BY orNER. �NEST 50U7HLAK<E BL\/D. F.M.#1700 A Q�IJ U U� ra I J f l ll;z �m i { �n� Jff r n Gp N l I v/Y Ln�w co co C9W ao LJ o U X Ono � to N O � O i» �we - U_ FOR --; 50UTHLA<E GRO551N67 ANIMAL CLINIC L.ANI:�5�AFE: 1=1 AN � NORTi ' WEST SOUTHLAKE BLVD.#1T0°f SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS !� TARRANT COUNTY - — SCALE: 1 "=2O'-O FL.Ai4T cAWaP''f TICES j;o aa.CALWW . �1!0 "016 4JI CAI.tftP SLa cm&V- • AT TIME , 1 T4L�. Yd-UPOW Q cvHlzU5 Ira i4fsoLAP40114'r 90u.Y OWNER MARK COX 103q 5URNEY LANE 50UTHLAKF.,TX. TELE�BI�-a3i-g5gi FAX#8f't-431-6q'12 APPLICANT: MARK COX "fhOg2 10Sq BURNE`I' LANE 50UTHLAICL,TX. TEL.E�81'i-43f-g5gl FAX��I'7-431-bq'7 .► o Q% 1202 S. WHlTE CHAPEL ROAD SUfTE A SCUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76492 QFC. 817-486-9397 • FAX 817--251-320 .528 ACRES 77 jj CASE r /1AAGr1G.rTtnAi Oel^M ILL Ar_ G.Oier Y`� . - • , - � —. . . yr ..r. vyr� (.K ..n vv ✓, REAR ELEVAMON SCALE: 8" 'i 10' PLATE_ FIN15H FLOOR xs' TYPICAL ROOF: PITCH 7 _ 10' PLATE FINISH FLOOR 14W' �rgpJJ .. RIC T 5CDE EL.E` A710N C . SCALE: I/8 - '/• � i i i I i • M/ II .. i I I .. IN �r �' r► � y — .. � , .+- � uil''+"L77"a�7q r nu -, 7•t7fir7[1i+17°I-17F.37 ,t771.1"iltl117 77r Rfi!{?7i°t'+°+ rrrr - - rrrr ---� a_ _ rrrr �s - _ • �. rrrr: ■r®■` _ _ '= :� - �leR. _ -..._ , _ ®rrr z rr■®:rrrr t<: !?x. "' =z. - <. � s _ filar • rrrr rrrr = rrar zl _ t _ - _ ��-1 _ tell �- -- I _ ., ... i _ 11 ,•.t. x.�-,3t!"^Z.•:Si.�""'XC" ,.sZ ST.: — --•eta i 4 , 1 ` 1;a .... . :. �_.,..._ .-�. ,.:. .....,,• _<.. �.,., ,.,,.....: ..'�.-:.s �.'. `. : _ �,.�siF,:L-�. _-....._r. ,eta _...�...t .�'�4_�._s._ r�',+,d - 4 ONALD ERNEST ZUERCHER ' F I S $ I. PROPOSED ZONING SF ;WA q , of land. I . I AND FE LINDA NANNETTE ZUERCHER VOL. 8551, PG. 1218:; I I i I. ''I a1- LAND USE DESIGNATION MEDIUM OfN'SI Y 1�, VLF �' i D.R.T.C.T. i~� = F, P to ai oI•++ of �i i t oa 3 of io o� & FLOODPLAIN 4 �} o, Oti rn i i a p m t o� i i �, 1 ; d 11 10 9 t g 7 6 �, t 5 a� i 4 2 1 F N ,VO�O��`t� I© �; 201EB sf 20007 sf I I 7 f 2a007 sf f !~ I 2aQ07 sf 20007 sf �" CU cc LOT COUNT 27 { 1 r. 2000 5 20007 s 20007 sf 29012 sf'I I L I 20007 sf 20950 sf I SITE DENSITY 1.42 D A DENNIS GARY KELLEY r AND WIFE DONNA E. KELLEY I ZONED: SF-1A 3 VOL.11434, PG. 1179 I I : I I LUD: LOW DENSITY: D.R.T,C.T. I I ( ( I RESIDENTIALoil I 192 3' 9'UE 110' 105.3' I ( !05 3` 5' 105.3�' 108,_3'— I 1 105. 1Q5 .i25 _ 105 3' 3' _ —————— --- — —— --- --- ---- — ---- }-- --- --- -- — -- -- ....— ��. — .�,0+— a ilia _ - — _ — — — — — _ — — — RONALD ERNEST ZUt`RCHER PLANNING 8 ZORIING CpAMNISSION __ ___ _ ,Y _ AND IFE LINDA NANNETTE ZUERCNER 10' D6UE— 10' D6UE _------ -- -- — ___.---___ —------- ------ i5'06UE — I VLINDAN1 PG Z Date Approved, 1 i POW(* L D. R. T. C. T. r ALTON:EARL WELLS I w,-- Chairtfm fX AND. WIFE < W I m Secretory SYLVIA JEAN WELLS I� cu ��w I� VOL. 5129, PG. 285, D.R.T.C.T. �i o m rn p �'� dcn . a i .2�?� flu4 Iq < r N �. �ti. �P i I O1 ' J i i (F p�Q�. r CITY COUNCIL` o R►DGEWOOD PHASE II � � �� ! BONED: SF-1 A m pO�J�`�� Date Approved" . Q I LUD: LOW DENSITY 35'8� CAB. A, SL. 3270 do ���� RESIDENTIAL Mayes, P.R.T.C.T. �. Q 35 ' 8L •� City Secretory 1 . I \ '�" J GLEN R kRDA AND WIFE SUZANNE BURDA f DBA GRB CONSTRUCTION ( VOL 11572 , PG 1813 _ _ - - DRTCT �\ WARRINGTON PLAN w LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTES:< #a for Z4} Y _ ♦ FRANCHISE UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATIONS hf BEING a 19.006 acre tract of land in the JJ Freshour Survey. Abstract No. 521 situated in the MAY BE VARIED TO SAVE TREES. F'"'0 p FLORENCE City of Southlake, Tarrant County. Texas and being that tract of land conveyed to Fred Joyce - 3 Rya: Mar Myers Enterprises, Inc. 8y deed recorded in volume XXXx, Page.xXX of the Deed ALL EXISTING STUCTURES WILL BE REMOVED. i Y K F: r Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: � ,- LOT 16, BLOCK 2 IN `ITS ENTIRETY WILL BE .,> ♦/y�/'� 'A� BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron pin found at the Northeast corner: of Lot 9. Block 2 of Ridgood. DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE EASEMENT. �[ Cn MN Phase II, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A. Slide-3270 of-ttfie Plat a MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS WHERE :. Records of Tarrant County. Texas; z REGUIRED WILL BE SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT. 71998 THENCE EAST 655.00 feet to a point, said point being the Northwast -corner of a tr"a t of land hECD , > r '. p P 9 C- .t j conveyed to E.- Johnson by deed recorded in Volume-651q1, Pbge 64 of the Deed Records „ a s DEVEWPW BY. P1t. WA BY. � t J DVS of Tarrant County. Texas;�TT�►�i:a a F t We line f d Johnson r ct 1264, f o in a n : THENCE SOUTH along he West 1i o said tract. OO feet t 8 pQ t, said point r f- n conveyed ..K nn o #� r �., being' Southwest corns of a tract o land c d �u .. Ito Johnson b , deed.. eco ded .., �LJJ <,• .., .' .& E. i 4 7 f d or of Tarrant ,Co Tx sa�.id in a in _ ... � in Volume 215 Pa a 50 o the Dee Records County.,. T: h ., nNorth,r ht f right-of-way line f n a Road . Rf3 Y i s r ,. an the exists a o Yn o Joh s W a o I . _ _ ,...,.-_ , . ,.,.... ,, ,.. r. , , _ T r f# d non fro f - _« : T N W Ion h existing North r #t o rya' 1 �, e � � ad 655 d i� to � _ i E a tee x t s # s ., et . _. < ., ,. _ _ . , . , ... , HE CE S t � . - ,, . ; a _t Y T ,. ... # - . EVAF�, BOUL 1 OUTHWLA etl' n , Q I� •rj�'r � hQ t tit/yam a -.� �3... aL}- x R ■ 6 • Q sec �-i ©T . O V �II�'� G d > T NORTH. H i2 t tv t T _ F E I - M, AU 77 4 „ + .. .. <. ... r.. . .S .. . -.... > .. ! a .. i.: • a. >. z a r . �.: . y f. _ • :, ; , >. i... _'sue x1 .. t :. • .. P ..' p-. ... .: .... . ..: :.. ,,. .. ..r r ... `,. ' � %Y o P f } p p .. ,. .. _ _ ," .. _. _ . >. - > ,.,.._ .. • >..... , .,. .. r.-.,r-. `�'.n.. '. .ram'.. ., .,, 1�,, .. _,.. : ._... ._,..,,r.... .. .. .,,,tig _.x..... ,:. ;,. ..' ,.a•,.: '�'. s2F^,� s_ .S {_ -.` >h r 4 ,. .. .. ; .. `.: .• ..-__ _ x., .a - ..... .. !r:.. -. ... - •..s > .r, ... .:>. .. - .t _. ,. r:' SOML CAKE BLVD. (I' M I PR0J50T LjOCATWN .M.114 q �R�VIIPE D GOl.1.�Vt11.s>s AIRPORT VIGINITY MAP Lot 2 Cab. A, SL. 3431 P.R.T.C.T. Block 1 Perry/Allen Addition Lot 1 Cab. A, SL. 3382 P. R. T. C. T. Howard E. Carr Jr. Vol. 8091 P. 1490 D.R.T.C.T. AVIGATION EASEMENT AND RELEASE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: WHEREAS, Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd., hereinafter called "Owner" is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in or within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Southloke, Tarrant and Denton Counties, Texas, being more particularly described heron for all purposes: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100 ($1.00) DOLLAR, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, Owner does hereby waive, release, quitclaim, and forever hold harmless the City of Southloke, Texas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter call "City", from on and all claims for damage of any kind that Owner may now have or may hereinafter have in the future by reason of passage of all aircraft ("aircraft" being defined for the purposes of this instrument as any contrivance now know of hereinafter, invented, used, or designed for navigation of or flight in the air) by whomsoever owned and operated, in the air space above Owner's property, as hereon before described, and above the surface of Owner's property such noises, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft landing at or taking off from, or operating at or on the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; and Owners do hereby fully having remiss, and release any right or cause of action which it my now have or which it may in the future have against the City, whether such claim be for injury to person or damage to property due to noises, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles, and oil the other effects that may be caused or may have been caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off from, or the operation and/or maintenance of aircraft or aircraft engine at or on said Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. It is agreed that this release shall be binding upon the Owner, their heirs and assigns, and successors in interest with regard to said property located in or in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Southloke, Tarrant County, running with the land, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Executed this day of _ _ A.D., 1998 Richard Myers, President of the General Partner Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR STATEMENT The City of Southloke reserves the right to require minimum finish floor elevations on any lot contained within this addition. The minimum elevations shown are based on the most current information available at the time the plat Is filed and may be subject to change. Additional lots, other than those shown, may also be subject to minimum finish floor criteria. Approved by the Planning & Zoning Comission Date: Chairman: ------ -- P&Z Secretary. _ Approved by the City Council nAt.- Mayor: City Secretary. M __ 5' U.E. wI 0 Lot 1R1, Block 1 W.E. Mayfield Addition Cab. A, St. 3447 �� ST S 0L/ P.R.T.C.T. Ty H. E. Eaton Vol. 12266, P. 1602 D.R.T.C.T. S �� 47'�2„ \ 787 83, 27' 5/8• I.R.F. R-24.00' L-37.70' 65' Rgl1VgGe 10' N qc n 4 % V N �o8j p/p/ 3 4 fNT ` \ L- � \ 30j 28 9 f2, I \R-24.00' sr� W S 410 20'33" E \ / L-45.74'� 3�\ 7a. 2 'COMMON ACCESS, DRAINAGE R- 5." 9.00'`� \ S �°s�"�?• f R, 5.48' L-35.84' & UTILITY EASEMENT CO�� et,i/oi� e3?J \ ��s 5/8' I.R.F. ON q 9 dine 0.89 re N70 sAS �,"S (38,845 .) W -..q OFNjGf Ng R-29.00' \L-44.46'0 N Lot 3-R-1, Block 1 n 'o R-29.00' 1JI. 6 N Georgetown Park M L-55.26' 1e. \ \ M C5/8' LR.S w 11 Lot 1-R-1,Block 1 0 N Georgetown Park o Cob. A, St. 4041 P P.R.T.C.T. I S "i Z- Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. R-� �. N 13_5' V. 12517, P. 747 N W L-37.08' V. 12843, P. 458 D.R.T.C.T. Z z N 89' 59'40" W 177.31' 5/8' I.R.S. < wUJ S 89' 59'40" E 177.31 Va a in W W Z Z _ 10' DRAINAGE 0 X 2 41 EASEMENT a Lot 4, Block 1 o W Z F Georgetown Park ; vi Q ; 1n 0 0 w o r) W 0.84 Acres .8 Cab. A, St. 4216 w R (36,713 Sq. Ft.) 3 o P.R. T. C. T. Q 0 pQp 0 W U W 8 F O 8 Lot 3-R-2, Block 1 !'I 2s.00 R' N R00' M zd Georgetown Park - ij -30. = w L-58.69' L-47.12' :2 Georgetown Monticello N Z 8 R-54.00' Partners, Ltd. L-24.91' V. 12517, P. 747 S 64'04'55" w V. 12843, P. 458 9.57' D.R.T.C.T. N e9'5V22' w 78.00' RwMOW L-45.55' �. R-2>a.e>r COMMON ACCES& OIRAMirGE L-45.54' & UTILITY EASEMENT N 89'58'22' w 162.19' S 89'S9'40' E 127.78' v e5 R-29.00' L-45.23' e� 3 COMMON ACCESS, DRAINAGE R- 3.13' & UTILITY EASEMENT 5 6kok5tL 1.13 0 00 5/8' I.R.F-.N 89-59 40 w 182.10' o Q R-29.00' 0 L-45.55' R-29.00' N s/a' I.R.F. N 89'59'40" W 163.73' 5/6• I.R.F. L-13.1V i` n \ 10' U.E--�- 3/4' I.P.F. N 89.58'22" W 284.55' 5/8- I.R.S. Lot 1-R-2,Block 1 O !2 °f Georgetown Park u� Cab. A, St. 4041 `n P.R.T.C.T. N z Lot 2,81ock 1 a I? 0 Georgetown Park 0.� M W Cab. A, St. 4216 0 (f). t8\a P.R.T.C.T. W W \ 3 0 o Q J M Z o Z •- 3 Q\� 00) O O R-24.00' Z L-37.89' o 0 N 89'32'29' E 139.48' N g N 5X us. S 89'32'29" W 200.08' u 5/8- ILRY 5/8- I.R.F. N 89'59'40" W 13.50' N 00'00'20" E 18.00' W. Meadow Oak Subdivision Vol. 388-129 P. 39 P.R.T.C.T. Lot 1-R-3,Block 1 Georgetown Park Cob. A. Si. 4041 P.R.T.C.T. s�s err. M' uu. J Roger G. Williams Vol. 11862, P. 1685 D.R.T.C.T. W 0 O W V/. Emily Shanklin Vol. 8718 P. 748 D.R.T.C.T. R-29.00' L-45.23' GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 10d k WON - Scale: 1 "=50' Emily Shanklin Vol. 8718 P. 748 D.R.T.C.T. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS GEORGETOWN MONTICELLO PARTNERS, LTD., acting by and through the undersigned, its duly authorized agents, are the owners of the tract situated in the THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, Abstract No. 474, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of a tract conveyed to Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 12843, Page 458, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, also being a portion of a tract conveyed to Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 12517, Page 747, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod found in the south line of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) at the northeast corner of Lot 1-R-1, Block 1, GEORGETOWN PARK according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4041, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE: S 70'47'12" E along said south line for a distance of 187.83 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, GEORGETOWN PARK, according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4216, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE: S 00'01'38" W along the west line of said Lot 4 for 396.60 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found in the north line of Lot 2, said Block 1, GEORGETOWN PARK THENCE: N 89'59'40" W along said north line for a distance of 163.73 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner; , THENCE: N 00'00'20" E continuing along said north line for a distance of 18.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE: N 89'59'40" W continuing along said north line for a distance of 13.50 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of the afore mentioned Lot 1-R-1, Block 1, GEORGETOWN PARK; THENCE: N 00'00'20" E along the east line of said Lot 1-R-1 for a distance of 440.40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.73 acres of land, more or less, as surveyed by Steven W. Hughes, Registered Professional Land Surveyor during the month of October 1997. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd., by and through the undersigned, the duly authorized agents, do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as Lots 3-R-1 and 3-R-2, Block 1, GEORGETOWN PARK, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate the rights of way, (alleys, parks) and easements shown thereon to the public's use unless otherwise noted. This plat does not alter or remove the existing deed restrictions, or covenants, if any, on the property. WITNESS my hand at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, this the __ day of 1998. Richard Myers, President of the General Partner Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Richard Myers, President of the General Partner, Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purpose and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated and as the act and deed of said partnership. Given under my hand and seal of office, this the ___ day of ----- - 1998. Notary Public STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT Whereas Robert G. Lyford is the lienholder of Lots 3-R-1 and 3-R-2 of the property described hereon does hereby ratify all dedications and provisions as shown. Robert G. Lyford, Lienholder That I, Steven W. Hughes, Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from an actual on the ground survey made by me, and that all lot corners and angle points and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me or under my supervision. Steven W. Hughes Registered Professional Surveyor No. 4717 PLAT REVISION LOTS 3-R-1 AND 3-R-2, BLOCK 1 GEORGETOWN PARK AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 1.73 ACRES OUT OF THE T. EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 474 BEING A REVISION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1 GEORGETOWN PARK AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 4216, D.R.T.C.T. JUNE 1998/2 COMMERCIAL LOTS CASE NO. ZA 98-072 OWNERS Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. 920 S. Main Street, Suite 170 Grapevine, Texas 76051 (817) 488-4200 (817) 488-5257 Fax DEVELOPER , Realty Capital Corporation 920 S. Main Street, Suite 170 Grapevine, Texas 76051 (817) 488-4200 • (817) 488-5257 Fax Selling a portion of any tot within this addition by metes & bounds Recorded in Cabinet Slide _ _ is a violation. of state law and city ordinance and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits. P t a t Records, Tarrant County Texas The of all corner lots shall maintain sight triangles . in Date- - _ accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. --------+�_.--_-- - JOBS g80282 0ADRAMg80282.D4,46\FINAL PLAT.50\i..DM bit SO C, � ` j t�+4 rn SURVEYORS INC. STEVEN KHU&HES 5T50 R f�E SNOW DRIVE SUITE 1-70 FORT iMORTH, TEXAS -IV e O METR0(81T) 448-3511 FA>((81-1) 656-•41403 J PET 1111 131998 OWNER: ANN SMITH ZONED: AG L.U.D. = MIXED USEr PROJEC , LOCATION I L ¢ .. LOCATION MAP tv � 1y %LJp of t cn— G �7 <' OWNER: BARBAR'ABRAt��' ZONED•AG L.U.O. MIXED USE; Z ✓ 65 d tfL` r OWNER: WAYNE lam ZDNED:AG L.U.D. = MIXED USE qy' Y 49'41 a A � 4' ¢Ax W ORIIIEWAY �> �VEX NORTH STOiR1 IF S, S 1020 ;;s x TC = .57 SCALE: ire •217 fig ; . / .. / " OMA SITE PLAN B.M. 101.00' X STAMPED IN CURB LEGAL DESCRtPTI}1 LOT 1 R 1 BLOCK'• $ S 17° 2Z 4 r} 6.70' SOLITHLAKE BANK Ply µ4� /r CITY OF SOLITN1..A1 TARRANT C' "` PREPARED: MAY 28 1998 REVISED: DULY 11,1998 BY: B.C.I.a... 4700 S. EDGEWO FORT WORTH, TEXAa (817) 536-6050 (817) 536-8754 iARY HOUDEK JU OWNER: RANDY PACK `< !ETAIL/IRM COMMERCIAL L 1998 P.0. BOX 30 ti GRAPEVINES TX � of ,�. �:a? �+ '�, :F i�aYr fa�?.':3• � r Y - Y r Ot"IRITTANY COURT Sr r Toning 17 ac JIM1Ar W. HQ0* i W Arne. 1"4 N. St�uOMi e+, TOM Rcwo. in Mai. P. B1 Z W0: I 1 4 W e c W M 41 O +� „r,l 'SMN,,+ z Vol. 0104. Pg.002 35 �sv �}k 1 Sr t ZR71 t+�A1� ftwolTE'3 zoning sr Rea. in VW. 344,--143. PC. 02 3 P. 0. a. 1 1 0o a PAMEL ► Wi1il'A►A N. Pivr Vie. Rcsc. . Aaiq. Imo. 1tM CITY COUNCIL SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS P'L.ANNING AND ZONING SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 1 Steak 9 2 1 3 4 M. sA ssafar�. wa.wir W PLACE Rea. in B�:T 386-109. Pg. 96 3 1282.46 LOT 1—•R 1202.74' a C!_ e 7 1 1 .62 ac 506,173 sf APPROVED PRAUM114ARY PAT LtJ"GWOOD ESTATES OT P1, T. 99UYY NO. 72 A00MON) (CAB"ET A SUCE 3772 P.R.T.C.T) 3F 1 Zoning L — Block A — e t found J$' Utlli Eo�ernMt 5' utility Easement OF fond m ni t� 10' Utility Easement o N SF r Zoning THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT Whereas we, YVES MEYER, at ux SHARON MEYER are all of the :ownwrs of a tract of land situated in the Thomas Seedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, County of Tarrant, according to the deed recorded in Volvm* 10993, Page 1430, ©RTCT., and being Lot 1, ROUGEMONT, on addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County, Texas according to plot recorded on Slide 1605 of Cabinet A in the Tarrant County Plat Records and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found 518 inch iron rod at the Southwest corner of said ROUGEMONT and being in the East right-of-way line of Peytonville Road and being by deed North a distance of 766.6 feet and S 89' 51 ' 04" E a distance of 35.0 feet from the Southwest corner of said Thomas Beady Survey and the Northwest corner of the T.M. Hood Survey, A-706, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 0' 01 ' 31 " E alongg the East right--of-way line of said Peytonville Road a distance of 399.15 feet to a found 518 inch iron rod at the Northwest corner of said ROUGEMONT. THENCE S 89' 26' 58" E a distance of 1282.45 feet to a found 112 inch iron rod at the most northerly Northeast corner of sold ROUGEMONT and the Southeast corner of Lot 6, Brock A, BRO ANY PUCE, on addition to the City of Southlake., Tarrant County, Texas according to plat recorded on Page 96 of Valurne 388-199 in the Tarrant County Plat Records and being in the West line of Tract A, Block 1. OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY ESTATES, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County. Texas according to plat recorded on Page 41 of Volume 388--1 18 in the Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE S 0' 01 ' 27" E a distance of 170.5 feet to a found 5/8 inch iron rod at on ell corner of said ROUGEMONT and the Southwest corner of said Tract A; THENCE N 89' 12 30 E a distance of 552.16 feet to a found 314 inch iron rod at the most easterly Northeast corner of said ROUGEMCINT and the Northwest corner of Lot 13, GARDEN ADDrPON, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas according to plot recorded on Page 40 of Volume 388--208 in the Tarrant County Plot Records; THENCE S 0' 01 ' 57" W along the West line of said Lot 13 a distance of 76.43 feet to a found yellow capped iron rod at the Northwetst corner Treat A. 81ock 1 of Lot 12, said GARDEN ADDITION; OIR* V©� !: ReSTATES THENCE S 0' 16' 29" E along the West line of said Lot 12 a distance b e. In Vol. 31�-1 1 a. Pg. 41 � of 152.3 feet to a found 518 inch iron rod at the Southeast corner of said ROUGEMONT, THENCE N 89' 51 ' 04" W a distance of 1835.44 feet to place of beginning, containing 14.463 acres or 629,989 square feet of land. NOW THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: ~1635444- 26' COMMON EASEMENT 7 a 9 10 11 BLOCK 1 Easement -- LOT 2 ,( so, o1' 57" W - 76.43' That we, YVES MEYER, at ux SHARON MEYER do hereby adopt this plat ��- designating the hereinabove described real property as, Lot 1-R and 2.842 ac 1 23,81 7 sf 20' Building Line 12 15' utility Ev,.nent Lot 2, ROUGEMONT, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being a revision of Lot 1, said addition and we hereby dedicate to the public's use forever the streets and/or easements shown thereon. Ydbw oapp�0 ;' 'mod EXECUTED this the - - - - day of --.---------_--, 1998. \. l 3 ------------------------------- YVES MEYER-- b \ ------ ---- ----------------.__- b� OARDEN-SHARON MEYER- Rea. in vol. 3se 2 Pg. 4o BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared YVES MEYER, at ux SHARON MEYER and known to me to be the persons whose o) names are subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the some for the purpose and wLot consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. �) 12 Zoning GIVEN UNDER MY AND SEAL OF OFFICE: This the - - - - day of --------------, 1998. h x Lot 11 y9 5 9 PLAT REVISION SHOWING LOT 1--R AND LOT ROQ —MRIONT AN ADDITION TO THE CiTY OF SOUTHtAKE, TARRANT COUWY. TO" BEING A 14.463 ACRE TRACT IN THE THOMAS BEEFY SURVEY. A-i-72 AND BEING A REVISION OF LOT 1, ROUGEMONT ADDITION AS REWROED IN CABINET A SLIDE 1605 OF THE TARRANT COUNTY PLAT RECORDS. Y This plat is filed in Cabinet, Slide _ ___, Lh�►ilytpt. This is to certify that 1. 7HOMAS L THOMPSON. a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Tacos. having R platted the above an from an actual su ►may on the+ ground; and that all m angle points, and Points of curve shall be properly Eked on the ground. and that this pint correctly re Is that survey mode by me or 1400 `�� E� Soute�tlard under my direction or sUO*Vision. State 1 11 IR L 1 /MI Rv ela a. 'Yx 7 Thomas L ?ho peon 81771 15- t 9 f*X- Texas Res�iatr�o►t ,on Igo. 1237 Date: JUNE 112, t;. JUN . .. . 4 ..,. .. ..s.d. §e.... +• ., .. ,. ., e_G.Ys,-..iYhe1. ,2P. sai.�t3rt __. _. , ,q _. ^. .•.. �. y46. �, �. .ram A = 05"27'52" R = 1428.00' T = 68.15' ' L = 136.19' o / _TFAAPnpi 0 = 43'31'22 R = 772.00 T = 308.1 i L = 586.4,4 LEGEND OPROPOSED TREE PROPOSED PIPE BOLLARD EXISTING BUILDING FACE F — — ^ — — — — � PROPOSED FIRE LANE L — — —— --J EXISTING TREE COVER ENTERANCE / EXIT , Ono PROPOSED TREE PROPOSED PIPE BOLLARD � oJn. n 0 0 0 O0 TREE WELLS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAISED PAVEMENT 0 MARKERS (TYP.) LIJ_j 0 Q CONCRETE WHEELSTOP (TYP. ) PARKING DETAIL - PAVER AREAS N.T.S RECIPROCAL FIRE LANE A GREEMEN T 4 CAMPUS CAE NO TES.• 1. ALL TRASH DUMPSTERS WILL BE LOCATED INSIDE THE STRUCTURES. 2. THERE WILL BE NO OUTSIDE STORAGE. J. ALL LIGHTING, SIGNING & EXTERIOR AUDITORY DEVICES SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING ADJACENT SOLANA DEVELOPMENT. 4. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE OF PROPOSED EXTENSION OF W. KIRKWOOD BLVD. TO BE DETERMINED AT A L A TER DA TE. 5. ALL PA WNG TO REINFORCED CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. _\s 0 30 60 90 120 1 "= 6 0' Maguire Thomas Partners LOCATION MAP N.T.S. SrTE AREA TABLE Total Acreage 22.618 AC. (985,240 SF) Building Coverage 1 Pork Circle 0.71 AC. (30, 794 SF) 2 Park Circle 0.67 AC. (29, 316 SF) 3 Park Circle 1.22 AC. (53, 000 SF) TOTAL. 2.60 AC. (113,110 SF) Total Site Coverage 113,110/985,240=11.5R Bldg. Area Floor Area Max. Bldg. # of Loading Spaces Looding' Spaces by Use Height Stories Required Provided 1 Park Circle 154,782 SF General Office 78 FT 5 2 Reg. 2 Reg. 2 Park Circle 147,491 SF General Office 78 FT 5 1 Reg, 1 Reg. 3 Park Circle 217,975 SF General office 69 FT 4 2 Reg. 2 Reg. Total Bldg. SF 514, 336 SF F.A.R.: (514,338/985,240)(100)=52R Parking Garage N/A Parking 47 FT 3 N/A N/A RECI PRE A GREEMEN SITE PLAN FOR PARKING SUMMARY TABLE Parking Required: 1,715 SPACES Parking Provided Surface: 463 SPACES Garage: 1.333 SPACES Total Parking Provided: 1, 796 SPACES (AN Parking Spaces- Standard- 8,5'08') LANDSCAPE SUMMARY TABLE Total Acreage: 22.618 AC. (985, 240 SF) Pavement: a20 AC. (357,224 SF) Building: 5.09 AC. (221,781 SF) li Walkways: 0.70 AC. (30,278 SF) Landscape (38.16%): 8.63 AC. (375,836 SF) LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING LOT 2, BLOCK 1 OF THE WESTLAKE/SOUTHLAKE PARK ADDITION NO. 1 TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. S"LANA PAt�K CIRCLE SOUTHLAKE.TEXAS OWNER/DEVELOPER: MAGUIRE PARTNERS/ WESTLAKE PARTNERSHIP NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE SUITE 500 WESTLAKE, TEXAS 76262 817/430-0303 ENGINEER: F 0 &DC CD N HU11T--Z-0LLtXr\-3 Hultt-Zolara, Inc. Engtmering/Architecture 30 McKinney Ave. Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75204 0 Phone (214) 871-3311 Fax (214) 871-0757 M 7-13-98 rn ' 3 W IECD I E 3 1998 SHEET 1 OF 8 CASE NO. Z497--0165 N Z aa�M i *kT_4iLIC 12"W EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER EXISTING FIRE LINE 12"W EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 10"SS 24"SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING GAS LINE G EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE T EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE E - FT — - FUTURE TELEPHONE LINE PROPOSED CONTOUR 620 24" R.C.P. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN ® PROPOSED 3'X3' STORM INLET v; W CO I 0400 Q 0 s „g- 00 10'x10' RIP— ° / o o 0 �,R_C ° GAR E f3 �'� F-6 .0 ° ° O O ° O ° 620 o O ° O ° � O .O ° p ,�• ° ° 0 o JUNC N BOX e ° ° 0 0 0 O b ` O I / 00 0' 1R° ° o 0 O Q O O _ O O O l O O O e e O 0 l O O O O o o O ° ! O O O ° ° ° • D O ° v� O I+ , R.C.P, 0 ° o p � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° �9 ✓ o e o °'ate 6 ° ° ° ° O ° ° O ° e° ° O O O R• 4 R. PA p e o e —32L , ° Q. . ° 1 X R. O e ° o Io 0 0 0 0 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 0 0 QOOO °° o o° 8 0° IS 8 0 0 0 0 0 n 621 J °D x a21 821 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • o 0 °9 0 0 0 021'SD 1• 0 12"SD BUILDING #11 0• ' FF 622.00 ' O / D O 12"SD EX o BUILDING #10 FF-622.00 ° I 2"SD -Will ISO" m - ago-- ° 617 62 ° eta '* 615 EXISTING CAFETERIA I FF=616.50 s � EARTHWORK SUMMARY: TOTAL CUT = 62,200 C.Y. TOTAL FILL = 47,150 C.Y. TOTAL EXPORT = 15,050 C.Y. THESE QUANTITIES ARE RAW NUMBERS AND DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR ANY SHRINKAGE OR STRIPPING. ONE FOOT WAS ASSUMED UNDER BUILDING AREAS, AND 6" UNDER PAVEMENT. ANY EXCESS MATERIAL IS TO BE USED ONSITE FOR LANDSCAPE BERMING. NOTE: EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON AERIAL SURVEY PREPARED BY DALLAS AERIAL SURVEYS, INC., DATED APRIL 1, 1996. AN ON THE GROUND SURVEY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL DESIGN. FUTURE GARAGE -i- CONCEPTUAL i"-sm-1 0 30 60 90 120 1 "= 60' • • • 620 • • • • • a GRADING / FOR DRAINAGE PLAN SOLANA PARK CIRCLE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS OWNER/DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: MAGUIRE PARTNERS/ HUI W E ST L A K E PARTNERSHIPZd,,.,, , Er,�nsert,o/Ara>+tecars NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE SUITE 500 3131 McKkm" Avo. State 000 Delas, Texas 75204 WESTLAKE, TEXAS 76262 Phone (29) 871-•3:311 Fax (214) 871-0.757 817/430-0303 SHEET 2 OF 8 • CASE NO. ZA 97- o8s 1 ,r / 0 \ LOCAMM .. LEGEND EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER EXISTING FIRE LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 24"SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING GAS LINE T EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE E EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE — FT -- FUTURE TELEPHONE LINE E PROPOSED ELECTRIC LINE —12"F PROPOSED FIRE LINE 10"SS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 10"SS PROPOSED WATER ♦ PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT oco PROPOSED CLEANOUT Is m PROPOSED WATER METER NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL INVERTS SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO FINAL DESIGN. LMLITY PLAN SOLANA PARK SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS OWNER/DEVELOPER: MAGUIRE PARTNERS/ WMWE`.0 AM rypCUE PARTNERSHIP SUITE 500 WESTILAM TEXAS 76262 817/430-0303 U E CIRCLE 0 M N N 01 i ENGINEER: J HUITT--ZO J O Huitt-Zolars, Inc. Engineering/Architecture 3131 McKkv)ey Ave. Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75204 U L Phone (214) 871t-33ti Fax (214) 871-0757 0 CV SHEET SHEET3OF8 O CASTE NO. ZA.97-085 L� = 05°27'52" R = 1428.00' T = 68.15' L = 136.19' L = 43°31'22 R = 772.00 T = 308.1 L = 586. 44� eO \On>> RECIPROCAL FIRE LANE A GREEMEN T 0 30 60 90 120 1'=60' Maguire Thomas Partners - - — - - =- LOCATION MAP N.T.S. SITE AREA TABLE Total Acreage 22618 AC. (985,240 SF) Building Coverage 1 Park Circle 0.71 AC. (30, 794 SF) 2 Park Circle 0.67 AC. (29,316 SF) 3 Pork Circle 1.22 AC. (53, 000 SF) TOTAL: 2.60 AC. (11A 110 SF) Total Site Coverage 111710/985,240=11.5X Bldg. Area Floor Area Max. Bldg. # of Loading Spaces Loading Spaces by Use Height Stories Required Provided 1 Park Circle 2 Park Circle 154,782 SF General Office 78 FT 5 2 Reg. 2 Reg. 3 Park Circle 147,491 SF General Office 271,975 SF General office 78 FT 69 FT 5 4 1 Reg. 2 Reg. 1 Reg. 2 Reg. Total Bldg. SF 514,338 SF F.A.R.: (574,33M985,240)(100)=52X Parking Garage N/A Parking 47 FT 3 N/A N/A PARKING SUMMARY TABLE Parking Required: 1,775 SPACES Parking Provided Surface: 463 SPACES Garage: 1.333 SPACES Total Parking Provided: 1,796 SPACES (All Parking Spaces- Standard- 8.5'xl8') LANDSCAPE SUMMARY TABLE Total Acreage: 22.618 AC. (985,240 SF) Pavement: 8.20 AC. (357,224 SF) Building: 5.09 AC. (221,781 SF) Walkways: 0.70 AC. (30,278 SF) Landscape (38.16%): &63 AC. (375,636 SF) PHASING LEGEND 0 PHASE I APPl a"TE START DATE = t SO AFPRr,1( "'M 00M LETM DAMR AUQWr M9 PHASE II APFi;DXMATE START DATE. OCT. >. M APPROaMTE comet E110N DATE AUQIffT ,ow PHASE III APPROXMATE START DATE OCT. t MW APPROXIMATE OOwPLET10N DATE AUGUST 2001 LEIaAL QESQfUf; 1 )N BEING LOT 2, BLOCK 1 OF THE WESTLAKE/SOU TH LAKE PARK ADDITION NO. 1 TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. 4 CAMPUS CIaCLE PROPOSED TREE PROPOSED PIPE BOLLARD NO TES: O� E 1. ALL TRASH DUMPSTERS WILL BE LOCH TED INSIDE THE STRUCTURES. PHASE PLAN 0 0 0 0 2. THERE WILL BE NO OUTSIDE STORAGE. FOR 3. ALL LIGHTING, SIGNING & EXTERIOR AUDITORY DEVICES SHALL BE CONSISTENT LEGEND 0 TREE WELLS WITH EX/S TI NG ADJACENT SOL A NA DEVELOPMENT. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE OF PROPOSED EXTENSION OF W. KIRKWOOD BLVD. I RAISED PAVEMENT TO BE DETERMINED A T A LA TER DA TE. J AiVA O PROPOSED TREE 0 MARK (TYP.) 5. ALL PAVING TO REINFORCED CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PA R' CIRCLE PROPOSED PIPE BOLLARD SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS EXISTING BUILDING FACE � no no F. CONCRETE WHEELSTOP L _ _ _.� PROPOSED FIRE LANE (np.) EXISTING TREE COVER OWNER/DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: ENTERANCE /EXIT PARKING DETAIL -PAVER AREAS MAGUIRE PARTNERS/ N.T.S. HUITT-%Z-OLLARS WESTL.AKE PARTNERSHIP NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE Huft-zoilars, Inc. Engineering/Architecture SUITE 500 3131 McKk"y Ave. Suite 600 DaAaa, Tema 75204 WESTLAKE, TEXAS 76262 Phone (214) 871-33t1 Fax (214) 871-0757 817/430-0303 7-13-98 SHEET 4 OF 8 CASE NO, ZA97-085 „.-.ems.-_' --- -° -. -- �r - --- - - - -•- ----- - - .,. _. _. �_- iIn•: - ' . tjx� %. ..';��f • • t' _ { �:. Z ` a,.{. .-'ice. i :.�,_., �,T T. - y. �.c� •'.-C-�-�". ✓ K. wc-........ �'a':.:.,P�a ..-..•.T • �. ..,- 7°"r� •...-� _ - - - _ , •i^:.-c _t a -.l'G. .� -•S, �.-_"i f A = 05'27'52” f A = 43'31 '22" R = 772.00' T = 308.17' L — 586.42' LEGEND PROPOSED PAVEMENT (PAVERS) PROPOSED PAVEMENT (CONCRETE) PROPOSED DECOMPOSED GRANITE SURFACE UPROPOSED TREE • PROPOSED PIPE BOLLARD EXISTING BUILDING FACE EXISTING TREE COV�_R PROPOSED TREE PROPOSED PIPE BOLLARD 0- 0 O o--- o e-- o Q, -- % O TREE WELLS O O O O O O RAISED PAVEMENT I ii a MARKERS (TYP ) CONCRETE WHEELSTOP �/ (TYP.) PARKING DETAIL — PAVER AREAS ti N OTF-7s I. AP12/EXT -WV PIN LJs TAEDA IN KIRKWOOP PARKWAY MEDIAN. T1z�� V CS I2-I�+ 4f-or +r AT same " Irk-W61 � LAYoLJT AS >r�IsT�N� PINES IN THE MEDIAN T-0 THE EAST. 2. 5(TE LI�H71t�►G, 126S,16 ! t�i OTHER, 06y4T LZVEI� 1rI*Tul s �I MI l-AR TO PNAO*'E Z . QUANTIT`( OF FI XTMRES YT'(f -TO Ds AFC r-�UIKW TO kAlr5VE 1Ji,HT L-EVEL5 A5 FHA5E 1, 't. ALL f'LANTI NCB AFE 'ro M 1 IZ v GIRT . SITE AREA TABLE TOTAL ACREAGE: 22.62 AC. (985,236 S.F.) BUILDINGS: 1 PARK CIRCLE 0.76 AC. 33,249 S.F. 2 PARK CIRCLE 0.73 AC. S.F. 3 PARK CIRCLE 1.29 AC. �31,741 56,271 S.F. GARAGE 2.49 AC_ S.F. TOTAL: 5.28 AC. �108,671 229,932 S.F. FLOOR AREA RATIO(F.A.R.): % LAND��C-Af'>c ARCHITEGI''S AZI GHESTN0r STREET HILAADEL_PHIA, PA 1�10l� zIS/ 440, ao,o - - L.EX GCRNLITA ' DuRfoFzo;1 . PARKING SUMMARY TABLE PARKING REQUIRED: 1761 SPACES PARKING- PROVIDED: SURFACE: 428 SPACES GARAGE 1333 SPACES I ZCr .N a 0� BL ROAD v- W 7�. .. O `,� f r y Z . - �, N��t'.. LOCATION MAP #� 5 N.T.S. c t-§ I L}'��� rGU. L�QU��%�t' IVh�� IFLW1+ ►Y7`�`�`"-'�"1 vlUK,. r 53 2'�... ?KTAe-'IA C HINF_1,61G -- &HiNgF5E: PIsT-AC_HE ZCv �}~�}'/Z�.a.. F'YRUS C�,t.L.�R�(A1�Na`c,+�Arrj►�►.�`.C,ALLEJzY P1=At2 - �� . -- I�,�.--��9.�/iw..:TAXoDtUM.-DI�fIU�IUM� IZ ULMUS � "��_ � = ` .. ,4-9'/a"�.�.• - _.G•RD►��lfi�LiD•;LEDAl2.'ELI"i -------IZ�I.�.r�--.-:pINLY� i�►{ff�=--+-.ii_L��.Q��►!. J-.iIVF�.. `�' �v* '' ...::.....tr CERC•K cAt�V F7 m 8-10' Rr C MYRTLE r n l ` _APRs'TRDEMIA1NGICA- DUNf1',OVEjZS/�}-IIzUi�/CnRAss� w1u� � `" ' �� � .a rsG., roo ZC4N,.. -299,00o 1Lrl X GoRNLtr/i_'bjRroi d1i,`-13i-�RPo�?D RL. - - TRAGI AIELC* 335,E 54.Fi:... WI LC?fWWEIz_MEAVIDv,/_ -gt� •OFNAt-*NTAL/ NATIVE= cnRx_,e�*mptwi ems~ 41 oao SQ. PT, v� ' TS 6 FOR S0LAjV.4_ PARK CI-R-�'��� WESTLAKE, TEXAS MAGUIRE PARTNERSHIP/WESTLAKE PARTNERSHIP DATE: NOVEMBER, 12, I�9(o OWNER/DEVELOPER: MAGUIRE PARTNERS/ WESTLAKE PARTNERSHIP NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE SUITE 500 WESTLAKE. TEXAS 76262 817/430-0303 ENGINEER: HUITT-ZOLLARS y$ f 3131 McKinney Ave/Ste 600/LB 105 Dallas, TX 75204 (214) 87 1 -1311 Fax (244) 871-0757 SHEET 5 OF $ .. • Maguire Thomas Partners Moore Ruble Yudell' TOP OF DRUM 698'-0" TOP �OF PARAPET - FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 5 Y 675'-0" - - - - - - FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 4 FINISH FLOOR LEVEL L 3 49'-0" FINISH FLOOR L EL 636'-0" FINISH FLOOR L EL 1 620'-0" - -- {� TOP OF PARAPET 693'-0" - PAINTED METAL COPING -- PAINTED STUCCO - - - - - - - -- %-- - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - --- - - - - - iii■i i �ii�i�ii WIEN ■1 ■1 ■il ■l mil ■1 ■1 01 01 0 4 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1''=16'-0" }-FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 5 Y 675'-0" FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 4 662'-0" FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 3 �FIN_ISH_FLOOR - - - - LEVEL - 2 636'-0" FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 1 NORTH ELEVATION TO_P_O_F_ D_RU_M 698'-0"_ 02 SCALE: 1''=16' - 0'' OP OF PARAPET 693'-0" FINISH FLOOR - - LEVEL 5 - - - - - 675'-0" FINISH FLOOR 0 LEVEL 4 662'-0" FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 3 649'-0" INISHFLOOR e LEVEL 2 FINISH_FLOOR LEVEL 1 O'l EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1''=16'-0" I i ui � ul I II X. t= {:.. ■i11 'i '�l lif ■ill 1111 Fit •• In I lim 1■ I 110 W Im, W., Fil 7mi .- .. I SOLANA PARK CIRCLE - STUCCO ENTRY TOWER HaidemanPowell jL artners ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST % ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST / CONCRETE SUNSHADE / CONCRETE COLUMNS ARCADE ARCHITECTUJL PRECAST - TRELLIS --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- 7 ----------- �tl■��N■o���1111�IN��1�11■11■1■1 ■ ii ii m-1 wi 111-1 Ell mi ii0 Emi IN vi Wi all ii mi ■i ii ii it ii ii � ■i Bi it ■i ■I ii ii ii �i �i ii ii ii � G ii ii ii ■ ii - -i 7i' ii ii i ii ii � BPI BUILDING 1 & 2 - ELEVATIONS 4 SF.PTEMBER 1997 SHEET 6 OF 8 It A4021 0 le Maguire Thomas Partners Moore Ruble Yudell MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE ENCLOSURE SOLANA PARK-_ CIRCLE Haldeman Powel"artners OP_OF_TOWER------- ----------------------------------------------- -1 - T --0"---------- - - ---- --- - - ;— PAINTED METAL COPING PAINTED STUCCO I TOP OF PARAPET ------------------------ 68O'-O" ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONCRETE SUNSHADE ' ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMNS 6FIN_ISH_FLOOR LEVEL 4 ----------------------- iLiLL A 11 "KYNAR" ALUMINUM WINDOW FRAME ARCADE Efl U n [I D 111111 [EEIE Hunan -au®®®® onin EHERERIIENII 1111 EE FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 649'-O' ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST WINDOW SILL n n Efl 111111 EU FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 2 636'-O° - - - - - �� ^COATED INSU�LArTED GLAZING �, �, �� �, r-v�, rmITJ Irl r'n r---n r--n =--In r-n r--n r--n rT r---n r—m FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 1 620'-0" 0 4 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1''=16'-0" -T_OP_OF_PARAPET �' 680'-0" ----- FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 4 �662'-0"---- - - - - -- -- �491-011 NIS_H FLOOR LEVEL 3 FINIS_H FLOOR LEVEL- 2 636'-0"------------------- FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 1 620'-0" - - - mm PAINTED METAL COPING PAINTED STUCCO ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST TRELLIS --------------- - - - - ------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - oil! ■I N! ■1 ■I ■1 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■I ■1 ■1 ■1 ■1 5.1 ■I ■1 ■1 ■i ■1 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■i ■1 ■1 ■I ■1 0 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1"=16'-O" OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE ENCLOSURE BEYOND ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST `n CONCRETE SUNSHADE ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMNS N ARCADE TRELI STUCCO ENTRY TOWER PAINTED METAL COPING I V OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE ENCLOSURE BEYOND TOP 0'- PARAPET -------------- ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMNS CONCRETE SUNSHADE I; I FINISH FLOOR LE_VE_ L_4_ I 662'-0" "KYNAR" ALUMINUM WINDOW FRAME LU [2 11 a PUP 11 D D 12 M U ® n [j Ij �FINISH_FL_O_O_R_ LEVEL _ _ 649'-O" ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST WINDOW SILL L-1" COATED INSULATED GLAZING UNIT ITECTURA,L PRECAST _IS FINISH_FLOOR LEVEL 2 UD 12-D 11111111 UEDU [IUD M U 636'-0'------ - - - - -- FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 1 620'-0" - - 0 NORTH ELEVATION 3 SCALE: 1"=16'-0" MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE ENCLOSURE BEYOND r PAINTED METAL COPING TOP _OFDRUM -- ------ - - - - - --- --- - - - - - ------------ --- ----- - - 689 -011 PAINTED STUCCO TOP OF PARAPET 1,77F-1 680'-0" ► �FINISH_FLOOR LEVEL 4 --_---_-_--_-_-_ _ -_-- 662'-0" - - - - - - FINISH_ FLOOR LEVEL 3 - 649--------------- FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 2 - - - - FIN_ISH_FLOOR LEVEL 1 620- $ -- -- _�:� � x ,: WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1''=16'-0" ■1 ■1 11111 ■I ■I oil ■1 ■I ■I ■I ■I ■I ■I 11111 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■1 ■ ■1 ■1 �1 ■1 ■! '1 1■ IN 1■ 1■ IN 1■ 1■ In !■ 1■ 1'■ 1■ 1■ 1■ 1■ ■ 1■ 1■ 1■ �■ 1■ 1■ 1■ 1■ I'■ 1�■ ■'■ I'�■ 1'■ 1■ 1■ 1■ "KYNAR" ALUMINUM WINDOW FRAME 1" COATED INSULATED GLAZING UNIT 0 --- ------ 0 BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS A40114 SEP'lEMBER 1997 SHEET 7 OF 8 Mai,yuire Thomas Partners Moore Ruble Yude FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 650'-0" - FINISH_FLOOR - - LEVEL - - - 640'-0° _qFINISH FLOOR �630'-0" LEVEL FINISH FLOOR LEVEL SOLANA PARK CIRCLE 11 Haldema'nPoweli i-Partners 0 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1"= '- 20 " 0 0 {� FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 4 6501-011 FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 3 640'-011 - FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 2 60'-OY---------- -- - - - FINISH FLOOR LEVEL 1 201-011 0 2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1 20 0 0 GARAGE 3 -ELEVATIONS 4 SEPTEMBER 1997 A404 SHEET 8 OF 8 V.111 M M A U V ['(HART - RIIFFERYARDS Location Length Buf(eryard Width -T Canopy Trees Accent Trees ShrubsE6k g al North - O1709 Required 390' 20' - N 12 20 48 Provided 390' 40' - N* 10 16 39 and North - Required 311' 5' - A 4 8 32 Provided 331' 10' 777.7 4 7 26 6' Wrought Iron w/Brick Columns North - Required 85' 10' - FI 3 6 8 FI-6' Wood Stockade Provided 85' 20'-FI"* 3 5 7 1. 1-6' Wood Stockade w/Brick Columns North - Required 36(' S - A 4 R (Interior /Lot #2 Provided [fast - Required 890' 5' - A 9 18 72 Provided 990' 10' - A8 l5 58 6' Wrought Iron w/Brick Columns Fast- Required 470' 10'- FI 15 30 40 FI-6' Wood Stockade Provided 470' 20' - FI"' 12 2-1 32 Fl-6' Woad Stockade w/Brick Columns Fast- Required 503' 10' FI 19 36 48 FI-6' Wood Stockade Provided 503' 20' F.I•" 15 21) 39 Fi-6' Wcxxl Stockade w/Brick Columns Fast- Required IRS' 10' -Fl 6 12 16 FI-6' Wood Stockade Provided IV, 20'- FI *** 5 10 13 Fl-6' Wood Stockade w/Brick Columns South - Required 378' 10' Fl 12 24 32 FI-6' Wood Stockade Provided 179 20'- F-1 ' 10 20 26 FI-6' Wotxl Stockade w/Brick Columns South - Required 89' 10' -FI 6 8 FI-6' Wuo,l Stockade Provided 89' 20' FI*'* i 5 7 FI-6' Wicxld Stockade w/Brick Columns South - Required 300' 5' - A 3 6 24 Provided 300' 10' -A** 1 5 20 6' Wrought Iron w/Brick Columns South - Required 360' 5' -A 4 8 32 (Interior/ Lot #1 Provided - - - - West - Required 508' 10' - F 1 6 12 48 FI-6' Wood Stockade Provided 508' 20'-Fl* 5 10 39 Fl-6' Wood Stockade w/Brick Columns West - Required 1440' 5- A 15 30 120 Provided 1440' 10' A** 12 24 96 340'/6' -- Brick and Wrought Iron Retirement Villas •Bufleryard N -- 20' required by table - 40' width provided with a 2O%reduction in plants. • o Bufferyard A - 5' required by table - 10' width provided with a 20% redaction in plants. —Bufferyard FI - 10' required by table - 20' width proNided with a 204%reduction in plants. PATRICIA ANN BAILEY VOL. 9866, PG. 1403, D.R. I'.C.T. ZONED: AG -U.D.: LOWQ;NsrrY RESID1 r' SITE SUMMARY CHART: Gross Acreage - 22.558 acres Net Acreage (R.O.W. Owenwood Drive) - 20.575 Acres Number of Proposed Lots -Two 9.25 Acres Phase 1 - Villas and Assisted Irving Center /Nursing Suites 11.325 Acres Phase 2 - Retirement Residence and Villas S 00a01'06" KF,LLER I S.D. VOL. 126.58, P.G. 543 D.R.T.C-T. ZONED: AG L.IJ.D.: PUBIIC/SEMI-PUBLIC S OC°22Iz-91) W 502.86' @OWENWO DRIVE ADDITION LOTS I & 2, BLOCK 1 CIrI'Y OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EXISTING 'ZONING: AG & CS PROPOSED ZONING: SP2 - for senior adult living complex to include tri-plex, quadra- plex and penta-plex villas, personal care facility, nursing care facility, and senior multi -family units. LUD: LOW M.NSITY RFSIDI<:NTIAL AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC MCD -!ill 011998 RAND 1'. CARSON VOL 9093, P.G. 1973 D.R.T.C: I'. ZONED: AG L.U.D.: LOW D£NsrIY RFSIDEN'i1A1 uvuuar,,,. 1,11—Ji. VOL 1211, P.G. 826 D.R.T.CA'. 7ANED: AG ) Lli.D.: 1,OW DENSITY RESiDENTIAL ' Deuelcx1: Owrer o p/ I Ernest and Joyce Owen Lifestyles, Inc. 800 West Soudilake Boulevard Soutlilake, TX 76092 (817) 329-0865 Preened Bf :- Peter W. Galier Associates 4316 West Vickery Boulevard Fort Wc)rtli, TX 76107 (817) 737-9513 (817) 763-8758 (fax) Percentage of Site Coverage 20.575 Acres or 896,247 S.F. land used 192,246 S.F. Building area on land or 21.4.596 site coverage 179,773 S.F. Concrete Drive and Parking 21,713 S.F. Concrete Sidewalks and Decks 4,560 S(l. Ft. All -Spoil Court 398,292 S.F. rl'otal covered area Area of Open Space 7>?&d Area Covered Building, Paving and Paikirw:- 398,292 S.F. or 497,955 S.F Total of open space or 55.56% 2,465.12 S.F. per unit L.1/PIC.I/: Ado IX.D.: LOW DENSrrY RESiDEM11AL S 88047'36" 8 4.6 3' SUMMARY CHART — INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Required or Landscape Area % of area in Canopy Accent Shrubs Ground Provided (Sq. ft.) front or side Trees Trees Cover S Ft. Required 96,123* 75% 163 316 1,627 9,759 Provided 408,985 80% 163 316 1,627 9,759 *Based on the following: 18,336 Sq. Ft. Villas (phase # 1) 1,000 Sq. Ft. Villa Pavilions 4,320 Sq. Ft. Villa Garages 76,280 Sq. Ft. Assisted Living Center and Nursing Suites 65,760 Sq. Ft. Retirement Residence (Ground Floor) 21,654 Sq. Ft. Villas (phase #2) 4,896 Sq. Ft. Villa Garages 192,246 Sq. Ft. of Buildings Total *Using MF-2 Zoning @ 50% _ 96,123 Sq Ft. Required Landscape Area 89,570 Sq. Ft. of Bufferyards 179,173 Sq. Ft. Concrete Drive and Parking 21,713 Sq. Ft Concrete Sidewalks and Decks 4,560 Sq. Ft. All -Sport Court 408,985 Ft. Provided Landscape Area DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS This development will comply with the development regulations as set forth in die MF-2, Multiple Family Residential District and the regulations for Personal Care Facilities set forth in Section 45.1 (39) and Section 45.9 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 with the following exceptions: 1) Nursing Suites units are 360, 446 square feet and 474, 540, 564 :vul 786 square leet respectively for Assisted Living. All of the above s(lu;u-e footage are below t11e eight hundred lilty (850) S.F. nutlitnum for MF-2. However, the s(luau-e footage's are over the minimums for personal care of' 350 (efficiency), 4,50 (one bedroom) and 550 (two bedroo n) square feet. 1439.03' The Remington @Owenwood Drive Retirement Community Retirement Villas Assisted Irving Retirement Residence Retirement Villas Center/Ivitusutg $totes Proposed Zoning SP-'_' - for seruor adult 1sw complex to include tit-plex. quadra-piex and penta-plex villas, personal can facibn, nursing care facility, and senior multi-famih units. Lot Area - 3.88 ac. Lot 01 5.37 w. (ALtNS) 11.32.5 w. OLPLAiflas) - 16.695w. Lot #2 22.� Gmss Acres Prose YI - 9.25 ac. Phasc #2 - 11.325 ac. n of Dwelling L-tits 15 units 90 units 80 units 17 units (60 AssL"30 Nursing knits) Max. Dertur, iduac.) 12 du ac. 12 dinar. 12 divac. 12 duac. (Provided) 3.866 dwac 11.20 dwae. 8.956 du/ac. Total Development - Lots #1 and #2 Min. Floor Area'Unu 850 s.f. Asst. Living: Efcieocy Unit - 850 s.f Mu 51 (Prtnided) 350 s.f.;I BR. Unit-450 s.f2BR 11 BR. Unk - (A'I-1.128 s.f. each Una -550 s.f. [46 1 BR. Units ("1""54 s.f each: 11 BR. Unit - ("A')-1.128 s.f. each 2 BR Lns - ('W) - 1.428 s.f eachl [Provided: 29 Studios ("C" )-474 29 2 BR. Units ("J")-1.069 s.f 2 BR Unit - ('B") - 1,428 s.f cachl s.f. 20 I BR. Units ("D" )-540 s.f.: 8 each; 5 2 BR. Deluxe Units ("K"i- Deluxe Studios ("E"}564 s.f.:3 at 1,285 s.fl Units ("F")-786 s.f 1 Nursing Units: N/A •_ 128 Private Suites("G")-360 sf2 Semi -Private Suites( ("H" )446 s.f. Afax. Height (Pros•dedi If within 100' SF zoned property. I If within 100' SF zoned or LUD If within 100' SF zoned property, 1 If widen 100' SF zoned propem, I stop, < 35' property, I ston, < 35' stop. < 3,5' stop, <3,5' If > 100' SF' zoned propem-, 3 If,I W' SF zoned propem, 3 If > 100' SF zoned propem, 3 stories Stories < 45' If > 100' SF zoned or LLID stories < 45' < 45' property, governed by underlying t I Stott, 22'max.) zoning district (2 Stories, 35' npical, 45' %taxJ 0 Ston, 22'max.) I stop. 21' n ical. 35' max Front Yard (Provided) Abutting SF zoned property: > 40' Abutting SF zoned or LLD Abutting SF zoned propem-: ' 40' Abutting SF zoned property: -> 40' of abutting SF zoned propem': > propem: > 40' Not abutting SF zoned property: > Not abutting SF zoned propem•: _> 30' 30 Not abutting SF zoned property: > 30' 30, (Concept Plan Protidedl (Concept Plan Prosided) (Concept Plan Pronicied) (Concept Plan Prodded) Side Yard (Provided) A busing SF zoned property: > Abutting SF zoned or LLD Abutting SF zoned property^ > 25' Abutting SF timed pmpeny: > 25' \ot abutting SF mooed propenr > propcm•: > 100' Not abutting SF zoned propem': > Not abutting SF zoned pmpem-: > 15' 15' Not abutting SF zoned propene: > 15, '40, (Concept Plan Prmided) (Concept Plan Pmvided) (Concept flan Prosided) (Concept Plan Prosided) Rea: Yard (Provided) Abutting SF zoned propem^ > 40' Abutting SF zoned or LUD .abutting SF zoned propem: > 40' Abutting SF zoned propem: > 40' \ot abuttrne SF tuned property: > propeav: > 100' \ot abutuug SF zoned propem, > - Not abutting SF zoned propem: > 20' - 20' Not abutting SF zoned pr ,rem': > 20' 40' (Concept Plan Pnwided) (Concept Plan Prosided) (Concept Plan Prrnided) (Concept Plan Prosided) Max. Lot Crnetage (Pmvx kd) 50% The Lesser of the underlying 50% :10% mooing district or 50'i (29.28%Lot ol) (47.896%Lot #Y) Aeguised Parking (Pr -iced 1 Space/5W S.F. of Dwellq unu AmL Lavin`. 10 - 1.5 spcesr3 I Spa c;_W) S.F. of Dweling una I Space/300 S.F- of Dwelling taut Boor area: 18,336 si, dnided by beds - 42 spaces (63 beds shown i !door area: 76.170 s.f. dw ided b, floor area 32.028 s.f. disided by 500 500 - 37 spaces Nursiag aaits: greater of 1 500 - 134 spaces - 6.5 spaces (15 Onc— garages and 15 off spce'3 beds or 1 space per (65 Ooet garages; 3 Twrtbr 0 7 Osier garages and 17 off Street street spats provided-30 tcwl individual sleeping unit = 30 spaces garages; 86 off -sweet spaces spaces provided-34 total I I driveways) (32 beds shown-30 units shown) provided and 1.5 off street spaces - 14 dnvmovays) provided-157 tool Combined king require pard: 72 - ii8 dmrwas arras) CombinedProvided: '2 RUBY Sl AY'1'ON VOL 3688 P.G. 180 D.R: r.c: r. ZONED: SF LU.D.: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WM. J. GOODE1.1, VO - 38891, PG. 41, D.R.T.C.T. ZONED: SF LU.D.: LO DENS1 Y RESID I J ELLICO CIRCLE: WEST JERRY G. ALI, / VOi,.38891, 11, D.R:I'.C. '. ZONED: F LOW DENSrI RESiDENl'IAL 21 '00" 04.93' .66 i .55' J 7801 357" -0 .73' Special RegturemeaLs per 1luunwm Ion area: 1 ac. Mir. 15% Required Amenities cafeteria Muumum lot area: I ac; Min. 15% Muumum lot area: I ac; NSin. 15% of District Rep. (Provided) of units designed for elderh or and'or dining room, housekeeping of units designed for elderiv or units dcsrgucd for clderiv or handicapped occupancy; Located service, library, game room and handicapped occupanq-; Located handicapped orcuparkel; Lotted contiguous to primary arterial. exercise room (or transportation to contiguous to primary arterial, contiguous to pmriarc arterial, secondan arterial or prtman these)_ secondary arterial or priman secondan arterial or prunan colleaor "Rector thoroughfare per (Provided amenities. Dining room collector droroughfare per thoroughfare per Thoroughfare Plan Thoroughfare Plan clenncmarc and full -service kitchen, house- Thoroughfare Plan elememan ckmentary school and within 5 miles school and within .5 miles of public keeping service, libraries (2), game school and within 3 miles of public of public middle or junior high school middle or junior hugh school rooms (2) exercise room, physical muldle or tumor high school facility. facility. Site Plat required- facilin. Site Plan required. therapy and activm. rooms (2). Stec Plan required. 1 Concept Plan provided) ( Concept Plan provided) ( Concept Plan provided) Other requirements letter ['sable Open Space: 250 s.f per Lsable Open Space. 250 s.f. per describing level of daily patient Usable Open Space: 250 s.f. per dwelling unit (30% may be prnate dwelling unit (30%may be pmare care, housekeeping, recreational dwelling unit (30%mav be private coum-ard0ialconies; 50% must be coumards,balcoties: 50% must be and suppor, services available, type coumwds;balcotues; 50% must be at ground level)-17 units x 250 s.f. - on ground linch-15 uruLs x 250 s.f of building facade and # of stares- on ground leve0-80 units x 250 s.f 4,250 s.f. - 3,750 s.f. proposed # of occupants and - 20.000 s.L service personnel: floor plan and list of intended uses and % of total floor area each use occupies; at least 20%open space -green areas. excludes parking amimpervious surfaces. etcand buffer- yards/interior landscaping per current ordinances. Personal Care Facilrn license by TDHS. (Yes employee loungesidining areas, sitting areas, gas fireplaces, country store, beauty shop, ice cream. parlor. theater/chapel, loggias. bank, whirlpool/home health. private dining, sunroom and landscaped courn ards. i 0 30 e0 120 t00 SCALE IN FEET 1'=80' 3 1 Ix f� Z N 1'=2000' c� o to U 4 W 0 1500THI-AKE B VD. U g o J 4 m fIl V) PROJECT s LOC A Ti ON cl MICHAEL UNION CHURCH _ LOCATION MAP ZA98-024 N 0 r-- 00 RAO SCALE 1" = 60' - e I' eoo` - e° o- •� a �� 5 55�I 4 C� S IN')bc 7 7 57 76 I 57 00 N 00004'35" W 507.72' z 590 EN S 00022'49" W 502.86' r- L 059 •' 0592 0593 50 \-- 01583 5843 86 0587 t 58E 0517 S 01010' 0 2" E S 88°47'36" E 84.63' A NORTH 1439.03' 36 47?47 0438 0439 0440 ] 0473 484 482 O 47 9 0474 468> 6 (6 63 461 458 4 469 00483 7®475 47� 546�6`45 h7 ro 0487 0496 0497 -- - � 4 9 050 01 00 3 i 04 05 507 o I i LLJ o 510 512 ° )0 01) 513 IJ 469.80 0rJ14 489 ®4 90 PETER W. GALIER Ass ocIATES 4316 WEST VICKERY BOULEVARD FORT WORTH, TX 76107 OFFICE: 817.737.9513 FAX: 817.763.8758 E-MAIL' pj g och�.net 0435 34 0432 �1 rO4 3 3 CI 436 426 28 4044 27 4 41 -- 45 41 52 422 416 0 5 4 51 AM nrll.lg -420 ®4 450 4430 2 0442 Q 447 44 n445 449 (C4446 r._- S 00°01'06" E 23 412 own • • 68 1514a 3 N 8905 '28'' E 370 343 339 191 89 41 O 7 8 ' 372 374 373 0 0 34241 3`� 31 326 0317 �� 037VPi07 3AA 2 76 375 3 � 0 337 336 325319 03 315 0188 0 d6 377 344 338 0333 320 C187 40 ��38 2 9 38 81366 321 0 O1 0 4 0� 7 �9---38Z---- 99 329 -- -&5 -- 026 5 8 30584 97 392 0347 0346 0310 02 200 0192 183 O57 052029 8 394 00 05 n 95 39 348 301 03 13 �177 p 4 033 1 G 3970 98 3 07 0300 15 g�212 178 �8 6 032 � 39 033 • C�'9 9B 02 10.204 0176 I 034 00 351. 2960 95 294 214 0 05 • . 52 0 216 0 08 Q -206 401 218 0217� g07 0�175 06 02 29302 2 0209 �- 040'9 3 7 35 291 02 90 210 1017 68 23 21 ' 00(D22" --- 'CY404 173 R 1 04.93' 02 21 358 �90 0287 25 0 23 0171 0167 06 T 2 0 . 6 6' 0 P 0224 L 40 .55' 3 (B6 422 �1S29164,,,036 88 73(241 �30 63 CB N 7 8 1 3 5 7 E O 284 0 0? 0�742360 2399 "� 6 "--i61 LC 40 .73' 362 `2770275 23 , . �234 C 6� 65 410 2881 0276 237 023 465 148 85 271 25Q4 253 2 15�57 49 9500 �27 68 Q ' 036 282 28 9720 00() 065 24�\�56 0�28 115 C V9 66 64 255 2440 l 4151 47 0 �3 102067 409 268 251 49j59 0145 152 0040 --- 0267 2500 0245?545 1�4 �25101010509 0�99 124 000 ((��,,��,, 00 - 0 47 142 (341 23 41 98 �37 246 �22 \S 0 "106 . 084 0 6 258 0 56 039 Q38Q �119 �4 � 07 259•.�n570140 ,jCJ36021 12 93 080 77 73 N 63°0 '30" E 0� 263� ('�260 d355 119 9 9 6 777 30. 47' 262 9261 32 118 0116 g 7 N 6 6 `0 ' 15" E 4 5 71 OU2-- - - _ - -- - --- - 2b5 64--- -- -- - - 131 -- - ------ 75 11.13' 889.81 ' 130 1990120 Coi`1C 2 0 C� 1**4"VV(D "ID DRIVE ADDITION R.O.W. MONUMENT Surveyor's Certificate To: The undersigned Registered Professional Land Surveyor hereby certifies that (a) this plat or survey and the property description set forth hereon are prepared from an actual on the ground survey of the real property shown hereon; (b) such survey was conducted by the surveyor or -inder his supervision; (c) the monuments shown hereon actually exist, and the location, size and type of material thereof are shown; (d) except as shown hereon: there are no intrusions onto the property or protrusion therefrom, and no visible or apparent easement, and there are no visible discrepancies, conflict, shortages in area or boundary line conflicts except as shown; (e) the size, location, and types of improvements, if any, are shown hereon, and are located within the boundaries of the property and set back lines from the property lines as the distance indicate; (f) the property has access to and from a public roadway, -------- ------------------- Hugh E Peiser R.P.L.S. NO. 3688 JUNE 22, 1998 JOB 0 P_1180I pEISER SURVEYING DATE: F.E.M.A. ACCORDING TO COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 480612 0015 B. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE "c" MAP DATED: JULY 05, 1982 JUNE 22 1998 1 1333 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE # 100 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 972}751-0055 SCALE: 1 " - 6 0' DRAWN By. �972) 751-1014 FAX )Y M. CO., INC. Texas Society of Professional Surveyors COMMERCIAL • RESIDENTIAL PS BOUNDARYS • TOPOGRAPHY INC MORTGAGE Member Since 1977 �/ARI ANGE5 ---- ---- - --------- REASON VARIANCE PROPOSED --------------"------- - NOTES: 1. Contour Interval 1 Ft. REQUE57ED -- REVIEWS — _ EXISTING REQUIREMENT Sa _ 75% OF` REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE MUST BE PROV I DEfD TO PROTECT d PRESERVE LAR6E TREES BLD6.A COULD NOT BE PLACED BACK ANY 2. Scale 1 " = 20' 3. Bench Mark: Square cut on N.E. corner of inlet, IN FRONT/SIDE OF AL-L 1151-D6S. FURTHER THAN WHERE IT IS LOCATED. TO ACCOMMODATE COMMON ACCESS DRIVE- WAY FOR ADJACENTRUCKERPROPERTY. approximately 500 ft. East of intersection at Diamond Boulevard & F.M. 1709 ( per City of 5b REQUIRED EAST BUFFERYARD 5c WEST BUPFERYARD LENGTH PROVIDE BUFFERYARD FOR AREA WHERE BLD65. BE PLACED -NOT FOR THE &00'+TAIL Southlake ) Elevation 628.66 4. Temp Bench Mark: Railroad spike in 22" Post Oak WILL _ PROVIDE BUFPERYARD AT BACK OF BLDG.B- 99.5 Easterly and 13.4' South of the Northwest 5d SOUTH BUF=ERYARD LOCATION NOT BACK 600'+ TO SOUTH PROPERTY LINE _ _ corner of this lot. Elev.: 627.03 GHAR7 15 CORRECT FOR BUFFERYARD,�LAND- SITE PLAN 5. No attempt has been mode to locate ANY BUFFERYARD INTERIOR 5e CALCULATION GHAR7 _ LANTIN6AS 5HON ON 5GAPE/P5 W THE DRIVEWAY WAS PLACED v,5 FAR AS POSSIBLE underground utilities. 6. No Title opinion has been furnished with the 6b MINIMUM DRIV"_WAY SPACING N6 FM "10°1 AWAY FROM THE ADJACENT WEST DRIcWAY ATO preparotion of this survey. Prepared for'. ►► S 4 Ay Ay J.E. Levltt Engineers, Inc. -706 Commerce Street K w Suite 104 -_- I 51 TE � Q ► 1 h kP Texas -76092 SOUL a �,, Y ` � ALO ACCOMMODATE A FULL ACCESS DR u COMMON DRIVE 15 PROPOSED WITH THE ADJACENT 7. There may be easements which may affect the PROPERTY TO HELP ELEVIATE AN ADDITIONAL DRIVE property, the existence of which, the undersigned _ - CONTINENTAL VD. � -- ------ - T --- — BOTH ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL BE APPLYING FOR Surveyor is unaware. r ter/ D O -7 LOCATION, YPE`� HEIGHT OF WA.-LS FENGES� SCREENING DEVICES LOW DENSITY OFFICE ZONING -NOT REQUIRING WALLS,CTG 8 Only those trees having a diameter greater thou _ o PROVIDE SUFFICIENT PARKING WE WILL PROVIDE 53 E7PACL'�S-THERE WILL ONLY BE 6 inches have been shown. VICINITY MAP 8 (4} TENNANTS IN THE (2) BLD6S.d NONE OF IT WILL PAGES A 9. This map is also being furnished on computer disk. / ���"" y rn Be RETAIL NOR MEDICAL/PENT L. However, the Surveyors Certification shall extend JOE HEAL BAKER K BOTH ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL BE APPLYING FOR Neither Roger W. Hart, - - 4:1 SLOPE LINE 3 SE7BAG IRIN6 40'5ETBACK only to the hard copies. e g PRESENT ZONING !fib LOW INTENSITY OFFICE -NOT REQU y ESE SF 1 A _ DIMEN510N5 ON BLDG.B —___.._ ---- APPLYIN6 FOR nor Area Surveying, Inc. shall be liable �n any way - _ rn PR RTIES WILL BE S '� .l r / I M Inc SIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS LB�wHINTENSTY OFFI�E NOT REQUIRING 40'SETBAGK for changes made to the computer file. Anyone L.U.D. — MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �� /� R. BLDG.A —__._____ -- -- k should first examine / y I4 HORIZONTAL VERTICAL MAXIMUM WALL LEN6vTH 15 ONLY 3' LONGER using the map off of the disk s r N / I6 n � AIRTIGULATIONS THAN THE 45 ALLO E_ -- the paper copy and make certain that the map on — - -- the disk and the paper copy agree. n / 1 `r X P �� qao�� `� Q- I'1 ' �'Xi LOPEMENT: MAY let. _ ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVE START MPLETION DATE: AUG. 1414i8 Topographic Map ° M<<�� `�Z oa `� rn ANTIGIPA ED GO E.XISTIN6 ZONING OF THIS TRACT d ANY PROPOSED ZONING: �� f 7C BICULTURAL PROPOSED: ✓�'-! WITH O-I USES �u'�,,r ExIS TI NG : AG � ALL PACK ; 0 � � AND USE DESIGNATION: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL A 1 .9 4 Acre tract of land I n t h e �- : 1 .,014 N : 1 .414 - GROSS d NE'T AG'QEA6E OF THE PROJECT: G � oa�� -" -° , ' � � I D i NG/P ARKIN6! ` r ��� / L / - PERGENTAGE OF SITE GO'\/ERA6E. 45%< � � -T � _ - _ , o E: 4 4ri8 50, FT.K n �d ; / b y� �� 9� ,� AREA OF O EN 5 , ia p, _1 �.11 I� �� o / \ ON 0 / ro 55 /o ® � � R , t` Z OPEN SPACE AS A ERGENTAGE � - _ OUTSIDE STORA65 AS A PERGE N7A6E : 0% a .O $vNG� TOTAL BUILDING AREA (BUILDING f ©OT PRINT): 11,8a: SCE. ¢T vK �� �$�JP��P , ARIE FOOTAGE BROKEN DOWN BY U5E: 100% OFFiGE t 8 99 1 rn O p� O(--CD Abstrac TOTAL FLOOR AREA. Ib, Q8 SQ. FT. I _ - -�,� , PARK I N6 LOAD l N6 SPACE'S RMOU I RED PROVIDED : I f\vU34 Ih,Ig8=5+I/300=(5q)=PAGES REQUIRED. (0, � (53 )PARK1 NG = �'55)70TAL SHOWN �.�'o -� 0 _j - R F PROPOSED LOTS NUMBS O rV RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: O-_------- - O � -Y v D � ' X -- $ =5414q S.F. '-� WALL PACK BLD6S A'd'S'TOTAL:11,8gP S.F. 50 o l D z z TOTAL INTERIOR AREA REG2'D:5,g4o1 S F. (P / w O TOTAL INTERIOR AREA PROV'D 45,600 S.F. - �i1 N A H G. �� / r � }- - O ill D v� �� � r- Cn tLL_S,a4q / 600= 10 CANOPY TREES REQ'D/PROV'D. "" ' 5g4q / 300=Z0 AGGENT TREES REQ'D/PROV'D. fail I� Z X ; 5g4�1 / 60=qT SHRUBS REQ'D/PROV'D _ _ � ''p 0 (��-� I Q ° < � 5,g4q x 10 0 5 5 - _— - / r,, G - —F-i" CANOPY TREES REQ' 15- TYPE �'� T TREES 30 ! .: f- i 410' ACGEN i+ u 'C� U� O -n C = SHRUBS _ _ 40 �, //. " , -- PY TREES RMO' 6 ' ' / U j �. ' �Q TYPE GANO ; R fTl Ia14' AGGENT TREES 4 ���� _ SHRUBS �4 ----- , I � G � , H.G. 20•'Po t Oak � o M � I Il TYPE A' CANOPY TREES RMO' 60' AGGEN T TREES Z �� n /� z O SHRUBS 8 AND 5G AP I NCB ° ° / / N OO,a 24' 50 "W WALL PACKiNALL Fq 0 ENTR10/ - I ��� i ➢ CONCRETE WALKS X _ Z C rn 53 �+4 L . �,p LAND5Cb,PIN6 _ ✓�, (10) PAGE q' EACH _ - , v m I O 15' O" _ BLD .LINE- - N NEiWI I E -- --- --- - -------------- -- ------ - --- - (VA AGE RE - -- ---- ------------------ --- -- - - - - ----- - -- - ------ - -- - - -- - ------ ------ __— 1 ---------------- _ ------ 15' UTILITY EASEMENT (FIRE LANE) . ' - -- - 43'-0" — -- ---- (FIRE LANE �1 --- - -- - _ ,�, R_ � --_ ------ --- - _---------------- -- - - FROM PROPERTY LINE TO �V _ _I I - _ - - GE E OF FM I�Oq C►T1C - -------------- / �NTERLIN - - - - - - - - - �I'-.," _ 5'-0 �STAGK SPACE) _._ - (h ---I Fri T_ DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - - - - ' ,° �D II z lotS 00o 1 6'41 "E _ (CONCRETE) 1 07?.37 W/ 8' BRiGK WALLS �� � r �D I C0 A tit I --. ,,,� _ �, COMMON DRI�/E(EXGLUDES SIDE BUFFERYARD ON EAST SIDE -� l i z z X � BUCKER, WILLIAM W & ZENA ,7) PRESENT ZONING — AGRICULTURAL L.U.D. = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I rn 710,0 rn --j(�C <Nc' Q �c D r M -` -r D a NORTH -__-- -_- -- y � SCALE: I"=2O'-O" I. z tr D (17 O 25 50CD �� r JOE NEAL BAKER / S — z' PRESENT ZONING — SF— 1 A �, + PI WITH OI U5E5 ZONING REOUEST cc L.U.D. = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Y� GREEK5IDE OFFICE .J /V /- `558-08 �&20 SOUTHLAKE BLVD. SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS C� TARRANT COUNTY N 0 0 o 2 4 5 0 W\----- ----- - =� }°" - -0; ` _ _ _ . _ _ - - - - - - - �J WNER WESTERRA TI M ARRON T 7&002 ------------- -. _. - - -- 1 - --- -- s.t -. �- �--+�- CS (7-- - == 100 WENTWOOD DR. SOUTHLAKE,TX. 1 �_ J TELE�bl1-481-0135 FAX#424-41140 -) 1 + + -' + 1 00 t -- APPLICANT T K I N50N C3� E RR�' W I L t> Coo Q� �'� 1 4130 PARKVIEW LANE 5OUTHLAKE,TX. + c CO CII� (h O� -=i- ---------------------------------------�-------------`�--------------J _ -- TELE�81F �-------------Ee--------------- ---------------------------------------- -----------------------------O ------------------15 UTILITY EASEMENT r---------------- - \----------�-----------4.AX�488-�4�0 _ �T cfl T 00 CD N C� Cb C� `10,-0" BUILDING LINE �' 1202 S. WHITE CHAPEL ROAD 0 SUITE A z r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 \ V0041 "E 10 7 2 • OFC. 817-488-9397 FAX 817-251-3205 I.q•� ACRES //,�, Z7 �- -_ CASE 73 — . RECD MAR 2 01998 C -P. -7 CT CD cc r- O G PATE: JAN. 12, IggB SHEET I OF' 5Y+"5. 1 '7,5?8 S F. :GALE: !'-O '' 1 TEE: L. /Okl-�bN I I I ZON I N6 REGQUEST CREEKS I DE OFF I GE J /\,/ 2620 SOUTHLAKE BLVD. 50UTHLAKE, TEXAS TARRANT COUNTY OWNER: WESTERA TIMARRON LT. '1b092 '700 WENTWOOD DRIVE SOUTHLAKE; TELE*b l'i-4b I -O l M INAX*424dM40 APPLICANT: TERRY WILKINSON 'ibOq2 'I5O PARKV I EW LANE SOUTHLAKI!,TX. TELE�bI'1-32•I-45•I•I PAX*488-2420 A& B ofhs 1202 S. WHITE CHAPEL ROAD SUITE A SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 OFC. 817-488-9397 FAX 817-251-3205 1,444 ACRES CASE # ZA98-006 SHEET 2 Or ✓ 5HTS. Ir IL �U7 EL VA' �_— J GAL / _ -O' DATE JAN. 12, Iq•Ib -4" III SECOND FLOOR FLAN SCALE: 1/8"=I'-0" OFFICE i kb z TYPICAL ROOF PITCH I� i W 8 W [X OFF I GE MECh. OFF I GE 5 OFFICE OFFICE 5 \ d BREAKROOM -o_Xa -o° c o. c.o.- OFF I GE LOBBY OFFICE fRECOfRDS FIRST FL !o■ son son Elm 10E son OCR FLAN Now man �•; y N on on UNI on� son one Elm on� no SCALE: O iv N R C�HT DE EL.EIVA ON SCALE: 1/8"= I'-O" TYPICAL ROOF PITCH gl LEFT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"= I'-O" FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-O" DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS No. 38466P D/298 Vicinity Map Lot 1. PINE ACRES ADDN. Vol. 388-113. Pg. 833 Pine Acres Court The Southlake Partnership Volume 9622. Page 2260 Lot I. Blk. A. WHITE CHAPEL PLACE Volume 388-150. Page 37 LINE TABLE LEGEND LINE BEARING DISTANCE • 5/8" Iron Pin Found L I N 00'17'40"E 30.00 (Except as noted) L 2 N 0(Y17'40"E 29.57 1/2" Iron Pin Set with L 3 S 89051'12"E 39.87 cap marked. "AREA SURVEYING" Lot13 L 4 S 8V I0'01 "E 20. 1 1 L 5 S 00*01 ' 24 " W 20.03 '\ \ � I 15' U.E. I Lot 12 Lot 2-R. Block A. GRAHAM -WHITE ADDITION Point of o' U.E. Volume 388-201. Page 82 , Be9innin� N Philip J. Goetz and Karen D. Walker Volume ----. Page - - - S 89-42 1 " E 380.49 J ` _ ------ ..• �_ ::� .�`� --20005' U.E. I M 49- Perr and Elizabeth J. West....Vol:..-.--. -'.. P.�'...---............................................ Carolyn.•Jo.,V..• Ponder ol:..-.-.--=...P9:..--.--............................. 5' U.E. \ ............x................................. �� \ Utility eE0(*isement o) LU Perry and Elizabeth J. West Volume 11368. Pa e 341 0 o Drainage Esmt. g 10 ON 0 1 50.513 S.F. o Z I Z 11 134.052 S.F. S 89*27 .39" E 04 r-, o 7- J CO N) .. S 89'27 ' 39" E 1 lqt tN, -� I O ^ m ' 0 0 o � - -1N -87 23-5 F-W -2 7-�00-r0 9-- 10' U.E Lot 7 0. W. KNIGHT ADDN. Cabinet A. Slide 3815 i Lot 8 611 Approved by the, Planning & Zoning Commission Date: Chairman: ___ P&Z Secretary: Approved by the City Council • 25 50 100 150 Lot Date: _ _ Owner/Develo er: Surveyor: Carol n Jo V. �onder Area Surveying. Inc. 4101 Buckin ham Place Roger W. Hart. R.P.L.S. Mayor: ------- - --- --- -- Colleyville. X 76034 102 W. Trammell St. Fort Worth. TX 76140 City Secretary: __ (817) 293-5684 Fax (817) 293-5685 0 Uti iL asement -N &T3 3`2 0--W - -1 F __64 6--U --I Lot 2 Block A. SUN SQUARE ADDITION Volume 388-212. Page 42 Lot 3 Notes: Selling a portion of any Lot within this Addition by metes and bounds is a violation of State Law and City Ordinance and is subject to fines and withoId1n9 of utilities and building permits. 2. The City of Southlake reserves the right to require minimum finish floor elevations on any Lot contained within this addition. The minimum elevations are based on the most current information available at the time the Plat is filed and may be sub'ect to change. Additional Lots other than those shown. may also be subject to minimum finish floor criteria. Lot II Lot 10 Block 52. TIMARRON ADDN. Northwood Park Cabinet A. Slide 345, Lot 9 Eugene N. and Barbara Stevens Volume 9060. Page 2328 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION THIS is to certify that I. Roger W. Hart. a Re istered Prof essional Land Surveyor of the State of exas. having platted the above subdivision from an actual survey on the ground: and that all lot corners. and angle points. an points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground. and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me or under my direction and supervision. Roger . Hart. R.P.L.S. 4484 COUNTY OF TARRANT } WHEREAS. I. CAROLYN JO V. PONDER. am the sole owner of a tract of land in the 0. W. KNIGHT SURVEY. ABSTRACT NUMBER 899. in the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. according to the deeds recorded in Volume 13032. Pagge 356. and Volume ------ Page ------. of the Deed Records o-f Tarrant County. Texas. and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8" iron pin found with cap marked. "CARTER AND BURGESS" for the southwest corner of Lot 12. Block 52. TIMARRON ADDITION. NORTHWOOD PARK. PHASE ONE. an Addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. according to the Plat recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 3454. Plat Records. Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE. South 89 degrees 51 minutes 12 seconds East a distance of 39.87 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found: THENCE South 89 degrees 10 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 20.0 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found with cap marked. "CARTER AND BURGESS THENCE South 00 degrees 01 minute 24 seconds West a distance of 20.03 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found with cap marked. "CARTER AND BURGESS THENCE South 35 degrees 40 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 171.27 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found with cap marked. -CARTER AND BURGESS": THENCE South 34 degrees 28 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 186.25 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found with cap marked. "CARTER AND BURGESS THENCE North 89 degrees 33 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 646.08 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found: THENCE North 89 degrees 23 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 270.09 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found in the east line of Pine Street: THENCE North 00 degree 00 minute 49 seconds East a distance of 108.72 feet to a 5/8" iron pin f ound: THENCE South 89 degrees 27 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 269.96 feet to a 5/8" iron pipe found: THENCE North 00 degree 02 minutes 59 seconds East a distance of 141.46 feet to a 5/8" iron pin found. THENCE North 00 degree 17 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 30.00 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set with cap marked. AREA SURVEYING-: THENCE South 89 degrees 42 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 380.49 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set with cap marked. AREA SURVEYING. THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 29.57 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. There are no liens against this property. NOW THEREFORE. Know all men by these presents: THAT. CAROLYN JO V. PONDER. does hereby adopt this Plot designating the hereinabove described property as Lots 10 and 11. 0. W. KNIGHT NUMBER 899 ADDITION. to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas, and does hereby dedicate to the public's use the streets and easements shown thereon. ------------------------- Carolyn Jo V. Ponder STATE OF TEXAS } COMITY OF TARRANT } BEFORE ME. the undersigned authority. on this day personally appeared CAROLYN JO V. PONDER. known to me to be the person whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on the - - - day of ---------. ----------------------------------- No Public in and for the State of Texas Plat Showing Lots )0. & It. O. �. Kg ni ht No. 899 Adcialon Being 4.231 acres of land in the 0. W. Knight Survey. Abstract Number 899. To The City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. ft0 A P ? 3199 -� s Two Lots OF rp Prepared March. 1998 This plat filed in Cabinet ---__-. Slide -__-- ROGER W HART Date:-_---------- 4484 ZA-98-023 SURv AREA SURVEYING, INC. Registered Professional Land Surveyors . 102 W. Trammell 8t. . Fort Worth. Texas 76140 • (817)208-6664 SITE DATA SUHART ANTE C I PATER SCHEO'ULE OF DEVELOPEMENT: START ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE : EXISTING ZONING OF THIS TRACT $ ANY PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING: C-5 PROPOSED: C-5 LAND USE DES I GNAT 1 ON : MIXED USE GROSS 4 NET ACREAGE OF THE PROJECT: 6:.528 N:.525 PERCENTAGE OF S 1 TE COVERAGE: (�29o(BU I LD I NG/PARKING;) AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 8510 SQ. FT. OPEN SPACE AS A FERCENTAGE: 5"730 OUTS 1 DE STORAGE AS A PERCENTAGE: C% TOTAL BUILDING AREA (BUILDING FOOT PRINT): 3,g00 SO. SQUARE FOOTAGE BROKEN DOWN BY USE: 1009-6 OFFICE TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 3,41CC SQ. FT. PARKING LOAD i NG SPACES REQU I RED $ PROV I IRE D : 5,4100 (I 8)SPAGES REQUIRED . (20) TOTAL PARKING SHOWN NU1,4BER OF P1ROF'oSED LOTS: C DENS I TY : O ---- -- ------ ------ --- - -- - -- 11�1TERI0R LANI��CA�E BUILDING TOTAL: 5,': 00 S.F. X 5096= I,Gi50 S.F. TOTAL INTERIOR AREA REQ'D : 1,q 50 S.F . TOTAL INTERIOR AREA PROV'D: 8,510 S.F. I,g50 / &00=(4) CANOPY TREES REQ'D/PROV'D. I;o150 / 500=('7) ACCENT TREES REQ'D;'PROV'D. I1415C / 60=133) ACCENT TREES REQ'DfPROV'D. 1z150 X 10% = Iq5 GROUNDCOVER REQ'L7/PROV'D /�V�ERYAR�! CART TYPE " M CANOPY TREES REQ' 6 1'16' ACCENT TREES 4 SHRUBS 24 TYF'E "A" CANOPY TREES REQ' 2 ACCENT TREES 3 SHRUBS __ _ I O LEGAL a�;R 1 TI CN A .52a ACRE SECTION OUT OF LOT 4 J.G.ALLEN NO. IS ADDITION DRAKE E5TATE5 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EDDIE L. CHEATHAM SURVEYOR Q sy T v W � z W F.M. I'10q N Q 51TE J - o > � m d � � v > Uj NTINENTAL VD. VIG NITY MAI=] ,0 °/ 5TONEBRID6E PARK / 5OUTHLAKE, TEXA5 '1609l L.U.D. MIXED U5E / EXI5TIN6 ZONING 5P2 10 4,9 0 of N.T.V.M.6. PRESIDENT LARRY EPPER50N L. 102-1 NULLIAM B. TATE AVE. /•J / / L. GRAPE`✓INE, TEXA5 lbO51 - CONCRETE WALK 4 / q' O" q' O" (4 5PA 5 @ �w q'-O' AGH 36'-O' O 20 w� 1H6c NORTi_'�& H �s- L. q' L. / (FIRE LANE) L 25' CONCRETE DRIVE O -— TRAFFIC FLOW ci 50'-0" FRONT BUILDING LINE / %` o, 25, CONGRET RISE 52'-10 / I (10 5FACIE5 C ci'- EAC-P = i '-O" S. 50 36-23' rt I'16.0' b' CITY GONG. WALK VWEST SOUTHLAKE 5L`1D (130' WIDTH) PARKER'S CORNER LOT-5R2 OWNER: DKV PARTNERS 5440 HARVEST HILL RD. 5UITE 150 DALLA5, TEXAS 15203-1605 �9 15 w 10 IF,4fli, O q' r �� Y I c• • II SCREEN DUMPSTER L S TO MATCH BLD6. DRAKE ESTATES LOT-4 L.U.D.- MIXED U5E OMER: JIM MARTIN EXISTING ZONING G-3 PROP05ED COMMERCIAL 1 `7 1 --- - - - — SCALE: 25 50 Q � LLJ rn r� 00 00 r� • �_ 00 o o Q Q CV CD a l" "J U cn Q �o o w x Lw F-- n0 0 = �; �Q Lf) J CV F— _ � d) W, 10 Q Q ff W _J LL FOR 5OU7HLAKE CR0551NO ANIMAL CLINIC WES? 50UTHLAKE 5LVD.#11041 5OU7HLAKE, TEXAS TARRANT COUNTY OWNER: MARK COX 1&01012 103q BURNEY LANE SOUTHLAKE,TX. TELE�81»1-431-g5`al FAX�81'7-431-ba'12 APPLICANT: MARK COX "160g2 103q BURNEY LANE 50UTHLAKE,TX. 7ELE#81'1-451-d15°11 FAX#81"t-45I-6d172 LBA&ka) z%ImDhMmD�o 1202 S. WHITE CHAPEL ROAD SUITE A SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS • 76092 OFC. 817-488-9397 • FAX 817-251-3205 .528 ACRES CASE ------- - - - RECD MAR 161998 DATE: MARCH 15, 141418 SHEET I OF I SHTS.