Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1998-06-02 CC Packet
Widif SPIN. city manager s report (1/4: May 29, 1998 Upcoming Meetings City Council Meeting June 2, 1998 +„` The following items will be addressed at the regular Dilt l e June 1. 1998 City Council meeting on June 2, 1998 - Keep Southlake Beautiful 7:00 p.m. Old Union Rm. Consent Aeenda: A) Permission to advertise for bids for slurry-seal of streets B) Authorizing a letter to TxDot committing to cover additional construction costs June 2, 1998 on Carroll Ave bridge overpass to accomodate Trail System Mater Plan City Council C) Professional Services Agreement with Lee Engineering 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber D) Interlocal Agreement for radio services maintenance with N. Richland Hills E) This Item left Blank June 4. 1998 F) Res. 98-50, in support of Grapevine's request to TxDot for assistance in improving the interchange at Bass Pro Drive and S.H. 121 Drug&Alcohol Committee G) Award of bid to James Enterprise for janitorial services 6:00 p.m. White's Chapel H) Res. 98-47, In support of making application for Federal Emergency Planning & Zoning Management Grant funding 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber I) Change Order No. 3 to the contract with Saber for sanitary sewer J) Change Order No. 4 to the contract with Mid-State Utilities for sanitary sewer June 8, 1998 Public Forum SPIN#8-Oak Tree Estates 7:00 p.m. Sr. Activity Center Ordinances, second readings. aublic hearines. and related items: blic Works staff will present A) Res. 988-48, Specific Use Permit for Explorer Pipeline at Continental and South Kimball (#7) information related to the paint B) Ord. 480-276 Rezoning for N. Peytonville approx. 200' south of Brittany (#11) scheme for the Miron Water C) Ord. 480-277 Rezoning and Site Plan for White's Chapel Methodist (#9) Tank. Call Pattie Minder 481- D) Ord. 480-278 Rezoning for 12,57 acres on east side of N. Peytonville at the 7492 for more information. intersection of North Peytonville and Plantation Dr. (#11) E) Ord. 480-279 Rezoning for 9.79 acres at Peytonville and Plantation (#11) F) ZA 98-042 Revised Site Plan for Dynamic Travel (#7) June 15, 1998 G) Res. 98-49 Specific Use Permit for Outside Plant Storage at Wal Mart(#8) SPIN#6 H) ZA 98-044 Site Plan for Roomstore at Village Center (#8) 7:00 p.m. White's Chapel Rm. I) ZA 98-037 Site Plan for Safeco Office Building at N. side of 1709 approx. 250' City staff will be present to east of North Peytonville Ave. (#13) bring updated information Ordinances. first readings. and related items: related to ongoing projects and A) ZA 98-036 Preliminary Plat of Coventry Park Addition near the intersection of concerns in this area. Call Tom N. Peytonville and Plantation Drive (#11) Ward 488-3136 for more B) Ord. 480-280 Rezoning and Concept Plan for Pine Meadow Estates at the S.E. information. corner of Shady Lane and North Kimball (#6) C) ZA 98-041 Preliminary Plat of Pine Meadow Estates (#6) D) Ord. 480-281 Rezoning and Concept Plan for The Woods at the S.E. corner of June 24, 1998 the intersection of Florence Road and Pearson Lane (#15) SPIN#10 E) ZA 98-046 Revised Preliminary Plat of the Woods (#15) 7:30 p.m. Sr. Activity Center Other Items for Consideration A proposed development for A) Setting priorities for County participation in road projects the northwest corner of iamond Blvd. and 1709. Call Other Items for Discussion: Al Morin 421-0873 for more A) Southlake Town Square Status Report information. B) Project Prioritization 1 Development Activity The following information is from a v.orking staff document. To confirm call Fi Y•'i E 481-5581 ext.744 4. PA • S.H. 114 City Council - June 9 98-024 Zoning/Concept Plan, Reconstruction Remington Retirement (#15) Channel Improvements along Volunteers Needed Jones Branch Planning & Zoning - June 4 at Parks and Recreation Before the detention ponds for 98-025 Zoning/Site Plan, for Wal-Mart and Village Center can be eliminated for highway Eisenhauer Plaza (#9W, #9E, Volunteers are needed at the #10) construction, provisions must front desk at Parks and be made to downstream 98-038 Revised Preliminary Recreation to help with properties to increase the Plat, Timarron Ph 5, (#9W-E) answering phones and other capacity of the current Jones 98-047 Zoning/Concept Plan, aspects of customer service. If Branch. The Trailhead (#15) you have 4-6 hours you can 98-048 Preliminary Plat, The give one or more times a Right of Way Acquisition at Trailhead (#15) week, call Teddi at 481-5581 S.H. 114 and Dove Street 98-049 Zoning/Concept Plan, ext.758. i Anchor Church (#12-#15-#13) This property must yet be 98-051 Final Plat, Harrell acquired. i Place (#15) i Utility Relocation } 98-052 Zoning, "AG" to "0- i:‘7/ Senior Activity (tie), 1" in Hood Addition The City must relocate the Center News existing utilities which are 98-053 Plat Revision, located in the S.H. 114 right of Southlake Bank Place (#7) I \\ Many Thanks to : way. Planning & Zoning - June 18 Consider: Ord. 480-BB Dr. Gregory Kloesel of • Race Weekend Impervious Coverage Southlake Eye Associates who The weekend of June 5 and 6 Consider: Ord. 480-CC will be providing services will feature races at the Texas Residential Adjacency related to senior eye care this Motor Speedway. Some Standards Wednesday at 12:30, to congestion during the early 97-142, Plat Revision, Mary Hoger, Sherry Nevens, morning hours of the weekend Kimball/1709 Add. ( #7) Mary Vasser and Judy Koehn and at conclusion of the races 98-054, Site Plan, Southlake for making and furnishing can be expected. Animal Clinic (#15) tablecloths, and to Cora Lee Brannon and Diana Collins for helping SYAC youth with • Water Service E-Mail Addresses landscaping work at the The City is in the process of Activity Center. purchasing water meters to be City Administration able to transfer the khugman@ci.southlake.tx.us approximately 250 residents of To RECEIVE THE SENIOR Southlake who currently Parks Department SCENE NEWSLETTER, CALL receive water service from arkrecl@airmail.net Keller to Southlake water. P 48 I -2776 OR 48 I -558 I EXT. 834. June 1998 C..; Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 ir7:00 pM 7:00 PM City 6:00 PM Drug& KSB/Old Council/C.C. Alcohol/White's Union Chamber Chapel 7:00 PM P&Z C.C.Chamber 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5:30 PM Youth 1:00 PM Sr.Advi- 7:00 PM Sister . 7:00 PM JUC/ PACKET Park Board/DPS sory Comm./Sr. Cities/ADMIN Admin 6:30 PM Park Center Board/Council 7:00 PM Special Chamber City CouncilCC = 7:00 PM SPIN 7:00 PM SPIN #8/Sr.Cntr. Standing Sr Activity Cntr Co' 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 6:00 PM SPDC/C. 7:00 PM City 7:00 PM P&Z PACKET C.Chamber Council/Council C.C.Chamber 7:00 PM Histori- Chamber cal Society/ Lodge 7:00 PM SPIN#6 White's Chapel 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:00 PM BBOA 7:30 PM SPIN PACKET #10/Sr.Cntr City Council Retreat 1 1 28 29 30 May July SMTWTFS SMTWTFS ili 1 2 3 4 ' 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 t0 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 IS 16 17 IS 17 IS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 4-. , 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 Notice**July 3 City Holiday** 1 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 5/28/98 City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting June 2, 1998 I � 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Permission to advertise for bids for slurry-seal of streets located in various subdivisions. The memo from Bob Whitehead lists the subdivisions scheduled for seal treatment during this fiscal year. This process helps prolong the life of our neighborhood streets, while simultaneously providing for a smoother driving surface. This (kw type of preventative maintenance saves funds since it delays reconstruction of the roadways. Note that the slurry seal treatment is very similar to the microsurfacing treatment used previously in Woodland Heights and Cross Timber Hills. The primary advantage of using this type of treatment is that it is significantly less expensive. Staff assures me that it will pose no additional inconveniences to the neighborhood motorists than would the microsurfacing process. 2. Agenda Item No. 5B. Authorize the Mayor to submit a letter to TxDOT committing to cover the additional construction costs on Carroll Avenue bridge overpass at SH 114 in order to accommodate the recommendations of the Trail System Master Plan. Staff has mentioned that this type of enhancement will come forward as a modification to the construction plans for State Highway 114. This is our first issue. Staff has been discussing with TxDOT the necessity to modify the Carroll Bridge overpass to accommodate the trail system master plan recommendation for on-road trails (outside lane I i Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 2 widening) as well as an off-road trail (sidewalk). TxDOT is receptive to providing for the trail by basically adding an additional 5' to the width of the bridge, but they expect the city to cover the additional costs. The memo from Chris Carpenter outlines the major issues. The request before you is to authorize the Mayor to execute a commitment letter to TxDOT regarding the city's willingness to fund the additional costs of the trail. Contact Chris Carpenter should you have any questions regarding this item. 3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Lee Engineering for the design of FM 1709 signal timings and capacity improvements. Your last packet contained detailed information about the staff's meeting with TxDOT. You will recall that TxDOT was generally amenable to many of our ideas, but have a need to review plans before they can commit. This agreement with Lee Engineering will result in the designs we need to move forward with synchronizing traffic signals and restriping traffic lanes on F.M. 1709. Note that this item does not in anyway commit the city to additional signals. The issue of construction of traffic signals at Shady Lane and Commerce Street will probably not be on the agenda for at least two more meetings. 4. Agenda Item No. 5D. Authorize the Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement for radio service maintenance between the City of Southlake and the City of North Richland Hills. The purpose of this agreement is to maintain our radios at the lowest possible cost, by pooling the radio equipment of several governmental agencies for better bulk rate discounts. As noted in the memo from Director Campbell, we will join the cities of North Richland Hills, Richland Hills, Haltom City, Euless, Bedford, Grapevine, Colleyville, Keller and the Tarrant County Sheriff's Office in this agreement. • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 3 One area of cost savings under this agreement will be seen in the reduced cost of battery replacement (we use rechargeable batteries, which have a limited life span). We anticipate saving as much as $25 per battery through this interlocal agreement, which is one example of the benefits of working through the North Richland Hills "buying consortium." Questions about this contract should be directed to Director Campbell. 5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Left intentionally blank. We originally had intended to have an item related to the Trail grant on the agenda, but we recognized that we need to take it to SPDC first as a matter of protocol. 6. Agenda Item No. 5F. Resolution No. 98-50. In support of the City of Grapevine's request ,,. to the Texas Department of Transportation for assistance in improving the interchange at Bass Pro Drive and S.H. 121. This item is on the agenda at the request of the City of Grapevine. It has been the standard operating procedure of the cities in the Metroport Cities Partnership to support the requests for TxDOT funding by Metroport cities. The Grapevine City Council has submitted a request for funding of the widening of the S.H. 121 bridge at Bass Pro Drive, and related improvements. They have asked us to pass a resolution supporting their request. The City of Grapevine has supported every request we have made to TxDOT regarding our projects. Please let me know if you have any questions. 7. Agenda Item No. 5G. Award of Bid to James Enterprise for Janitorial Services. You may recall from your packet for the May 5, 1998 City Council meeting that Kenniko, the City's janitorial contractor, notified us of their intent to terminate our contract effective May 31, 1998. As such, we bid the service again and James Enterprise was low bidder (of two bidders) at $24,129.84 for twelve months of service, $2010.82 per month. As a reminder, Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 4 Kenniko charged $1,550 per month, however, they only assigned one individual to the job which did not provide for the level of service expected. Additionally, we are adding the Senior Activity Center (approximately 3,500 square feet) to the new contract. Costs over budget for the remainder of the budget year will be absorbed in the year-end adjustments through under-spending in other areas. Please direct your questions about this item to Shana Yelverton. 8. Agenda Item No. 5H. Resolution No. 98-47. In support of making application for Federal Emergency Management Grant funding. The bottom line with this grant application is that if we are successful in obtaining the grant, we will be eligible for reimbursement of funds we are already expending. Clearly, the City of Southlake is obligated to maintain an emergency management plan, conduct training, and have staff prepared to coordinate the City's response in the event of a disaster. These tasks are currently managed by Deputy Director, Fire Services, Garland Wilson, with assistance from Administrative Coordinator Malcolm Jackson and Fire Services Intern Jenise Birks. This grant will provide reimbursement for the portion of their time spent working on the emergency management plan and implementation program, as well as reimbursement for equipment and materials. Your approval of this resolution will allow us to move forward with the grant application. Please let Director Campbell know if you have questions. 9. Agenda Item No. 5I. Change Order No. 3 to the contract with Saber Development Corporation for the installation of sanitary sewer in Huntwick Estates Addition. The packet memo prepared by Public Works Director Bob Whitehead, and the attached change order, explain the modifications. Note that this change order brings the total cost of the project to $277,023. The CIP budget estimated the cost to be at $200,000. The original bid was approximately $240,000, thus the total changes are within the amount allowable by law. The difference will come from the unallocated bond funds. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 5 10.Agenda Item No. 5J. Change Order No. 4 to the contract with Mid-State Utilities for the installation of sanitary sewer in Mission Hills Addition. Again, this item is explained fully in the memo and the change order. With this change order, the total cost of the project is $424,555. 11.Agenda Item No. 7A. Resolution No. 98-48. (ZA 98-027). Specific Use Permit for Explorer Pipeline. There are no unresolved issues concerning this request. The purpose of this SUP is to allow Explorer to add a small building, not to exceed 168 sq. ft., that will be used for testing their product prior to leaving the facility. Other petroleum operations currently are conducting various levels of testing. According to our research, Diamond Shamrock conducts two simple tests: vapor pressure and a diesel flash test which checks for flammable impurities in the diesel fuel in a safety- engineered office space. Conoco conducts gravity tests by an automated machine and a diesel flash test in a separate lab on site. Fina has two analyzers: an automatic flash tester and a hydrometer flask gravity tester which are contained in a separate room within the driver's building. According to Explorer, they are a multi-product pipeline. Explorer Pipeline, which supplies jet fuel to D/FW Airport, has been mandated by the FAA and DFW to conduct the following tests (in addition to the standard tests conducted by the other petroleum operations) at the beginning of fuel transmission, at two-hour intervals maximum as applicable, and at near end of fuel receipt: a) visual appearance in white bucket; b) API gravity test, correct to 60 degrees F; c) Color Membrane; • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 6 d) Free water detection test; and e) Flash Point (multi-product pipeline deliveries only). [Source: Section 6, ATA manual] There are some letters of opposition included in the packet but they were mainly due to the misconception that Explorer was going to be adding additional petroleum tanks to their site. At the P&Z meeting, those in attendance seemed to be comfortable with the actual extent of this application. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 deferring some screening to the west until construction was proposed in that area, and deleting requirements for sidewalks and bufferyards. Contact Senior Planner Dennis Killough or Zoning Administrator Karen Gandy should you have any questions regarding this application. Lee 12.Agenda Item No. 7B. Ordinance No. 480-276. 2nd Reading. (ZA 98-032) Rezoning of Lot 1. Block 1. Rougemont. from "AG" to "RE." There have been no changes in this application since Council approval of the first reading 6-0. Contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 13. Agenda Item No. 7C. Ordinance No. 480-277. 2nd Reading. (ZA 98-033) Rezoning and Site Plan for White's Chapel United Methodist Church. from "AG" to "CS." There have been no changes in this application since Council's approval of the first reading 7-0. A reduction of the same plan as previously reviewed has been included in the packet. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 14. Agenda Item No. 7D. Ordinance No. 480-278. 2nd Reading. (ZA 98-034) Rezoning on property legally described as approximately 12.573 acres from "AG" to "SF-1A," There L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 7 have been no changes in this application since Council approval of the first reading 7-0. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 15.Agenda Item No. 7E. Ordinance No. 480-279. 2nd Reading. (ZA 98-035) Rezoning on property legally described as Lot 1. T. Beedy No. 72 Addition. from "RE" to SF1A." There have been no changes in this application since Council approval of the first reading 7-0. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 16.Agenda Item No. 7F. ZA 98-042. Revised Site Plan for Dynamic Travel. The purpose of this revised site plan is to provide for an accessory building to house lawn equipment and potentially office records storage. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-2. (Creighton and Shankland opposed: refer to P&Z minutes for a record of the discussion.) Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 17.Agenda Item No. 7G. Resolution No. 98-49. (ZA 98-043) Specific Use Permit for Outside Storage of Plants or Other Greenery for Wal-Mart. Note that this application requests to exceed the permitted area of outdoor sales permitted in Section 38.3(a) of the ordinance. This provision states that businesses may "display for sale merchandise items traditionally marketed through outside storage not to exceed five (5) percent of the floor area of the business." They are currently utilizing the allowed 5% (6,500 s.f.) of the building area (130,000 s.f.) which includes the existing open air garden area enclosed by the wrought iron fence (3,729 s.f.) and the screened area in the parking lot (2,771 s.f.). The SUP permit request before you is for an additional 7,000 square feet which reflects an additional 5.38% of building floor area. Much of the area intended.for approval with this SUP request is currently being used for outdoor sales. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 8 Also be aware of the following "C-3" district permitted use: "Nursery buildings for the retail sale of plants and accessory items where the sales operation are conducted entirely within an enclosed structure. Outdoor storage or sale shall be permitted with this use to the extent that the outdoor sales area is completely enclosed by a fence, wall or screening device." The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial 6-0. Note that a super majority vote would not be required for Council approval since this is not a zoning case. Contact Karen Gandy should you have any questions regarding this request. 18.Agenda Item No. 7H. ZA 98-44. Site Plan for the Roomstore. There are no unresolved issues with this application. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0, modifying various sidewalk requirements as noted in the Staff Report. Contact (610, Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 19. Agenda Item No. 71. ZA 98-037. Site Plan for Safeco Office Building. There are no unresolved issues with this application. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 granting relief to the comments on driveway spacing and stacking depths. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 20. Agenda Item No. 8A. ZA 98-036. Preliminary Plat for Waterford Park Addition (originally submitted as Coventry Park Addition). This item comes before you without a definite recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. There were six (6) Commissioners present at the last meeting and all attempted motions ended as a 3-3 tie. This item must come forward to the Council due to the statutory requirement that P&Z must act on the plat within thirty days from the submittal date and Council must act within thirty days of P&Z. The main issues concerning this application are 1) Street stub to the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 9 north, 2) Length of some cul-de-sacs, and 3) Non-perpendicular or radial lot lines and lot widths at the required setback line. There is a requirement in the subdivision ordinance (section 5.03.K.1) that states "Future Connections: Dead end streets shall be permitted only where a future extension or connection is to be made. Street stubs shall be provided into adjacent property at a minimum of 1,000 feet apart." Staff has consistently over the years required that street stubs be provided where property lines were in excess of 1,000 feet in length. As well, the land owner to the north, Dr. Meyers, desires to have an access stubbed to her property. The applicant has proposed and Dr. Meyers is receptive to the provisions for a "Common Access Easement" along a lot line that would stub to her property. Staff has tried to point out in the review summary that should this be acceptable, it would not meet the lot frontage requirement for a lot created on the rear of Dr. Meyers' property. Staff is aware that Dr. Meyer's is currently in the process of preparing a plat (61., revision on their property which would in fact create an easternmost lot which would not have adequate frontage on a public street. The issue regarding the length of a cul-de-sac revolves around a requirement in the subdivision ordinance for minimum sac length of 150 feet. The applicant has met this requirement with the revised submittal as shown in your packet. The lot width measurement issue is that the lot width must be 100' wide at the 40' building line. Note that the applicant has provided the 100' width by shifting the building line back away from the cul-de-sac. There is also a requirement that all lot lines be perpendicular or radial to the ROW and the applicant has shown several lots with deflections in their alignment. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 10 21.Agenda Item No. 8B. Ordinance No. 480-280. 1st Reading. (ZA 98-040) Rezoning and Concept Plan for Pine Meadow Estates. The only issue related to this application appears to be the desire of adjacent land owners to be provided the 30,000 square feet lot area protection. Recall that section 8.01.G of the subdivision ordinance only requires that 30,000 square feet lots be provided next to "platted" lots with SF1 or RE zoning. All of the tracts east of this property are unplatted so the requirement did not apply. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 with a modification to a setback requirement and accepting the applicant's agreement regarding fencing. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. An issue that should be pointed out at this time is that there currently is not adequate sanitary sewer facilities to accommodate this or any other project in this area. Recall that Le. we have recently installed sanitary sewer in this area to service some troubled lots, however we have not allowed continued connections due to the fact that we are using a sewage pump truck every other day on the collection point until the force-main system can be installed. It is my recommendation that we continue to disallow connections unless perhaps the developer is willing to pick up the cost of the pump truck for an extended period of time, such as other developers have agreed to in the past. 22. Agenda Item No. 8C. ZA 98-041, Preliminary Plat of Pine Meadow Estates. There are no unresolved issues with the preliminary plat application. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 with the modification to the setback and concurring with the potential relocation of a sewer easement. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 23.Agenda Item No. 8D. Ordinance No. 480-281.. 1st Reading. (ZA 98-045) Rezoning and Concept Plan for The Woods. There are no unresolved issues with this application. The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 11 Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 with a few modifications. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 24.Agenda Item No. 8E. ZA 98-046. Revised Preliminary Plat of The Woods. There are no unresolved issues with this application. The Planning and Zoning Commission. recommended approval 6-0. Contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this application. 25.Agenda Item No. 11A. Status Report on project management. coordination and review of Southlake Town Square and Town Hall. This item is on the agenda to give you an update on things we are doing, and to hear your thoughts on our approach. There are two memos attached which highlight some of these, including Ron Harper's May 29, 1998 memo as well as Karen Gandy's May 19, 1998 memo which was disseminated to you last meeting. Currently, the City has two "teams" assigned to work in some capacity on the development: an infrastructure construction team and a Town Hall team. Ron Harper is the lead on both teams. On the infrastructure team, in addition to Ron, there is Darwin Cheatham, Public Works Construction Inspector, and Jeff Phillips, Building Inspector, both of whom will devote most of their time to this project for probably the next 2-3 years, depending upon how quickly the project builds out. A Plans Examiner (either Skip Vandergrift or Chuck Bloomberg) will be added to the project in the near future. The infrastructure team is concentrating on the public infrastructure, i.e., water, sewer, streets and drainage, as well as the inspections for the private facilities including site development and buildings. This team is housed on-site in one of the construction trailers. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 12 The Town Hall team at this time also includes Darcey Imm from my office, working with the issues of space utilization, intergovernmental issues, and the TIF. The directors and other staff, depending upon the issue, are providing support to the two project teams,. The Town Square project is not too different than the 175 acre Grapevine Mills project in the City of Grapevine. It is in everyone's best interest -- developer, City, community -- to move things along as quickly as possible. (For the City and community, the quicker the project gets built the quicker we receive property tax and sales tax revenue.) The Town Square Development is unlike any other development that has been done in Southlake. Given its importance, we do not want to do anything to slow it down, but we also strive to maintain appropriate controls. Grapevine had its staff assigned to the Mills project from day one, to make sure they did not start out behind. Very quickly into the project they began working 15 hour days, 7 days a week. We will have the long hours, given the nature of commercial development versus residential development. By the time we get into the construction of Town Hall, it may well require a 7-day work week. One area we need to resolve is where to draw the line between going forth with "insignificant" changes necessitated by some unforeseen exigency, and going back through "the process" if the change is more than insignificant. Part of what must be taken into account is just what constitutes or differentiates between significant and insignificant changes. Obviously, some things are easy to call, some not so easy. Going through the process usually means going back to P&Z and the City Council. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 13 Timing for the resolution of issues that go to P&Z and the City Council will be impacted by the respective meeting scheduling requirements. Things that can be resolved at the staff level will be moved forward at a quicker pace simply because of ease of scheduling. During the Council meeting, Ron, Greg and I will go over what we have done to date, and why, plus what we anticipate bringing back to you, why, and when. Attached to the May 29, 1998 memo from Ron Harper (status report) is a copy of the approved site plan and a drawing labeled Exhibit D-1, current configuration. Ron has circled on the two drawings the areas of changes enumerated in the memo, with the exception of number 6. We will go over these with you. FYI, several of you have asked questions about the temporary detention pond on the ,,. southwest portion of the development. Although the pond was not shown on the concept plan (approved by P&Z 12/5/96, City Council 1/7/97) submitted by the developer, it was required by staff and included on the Phase I Site Plan (approved by P&Z 8/7/97, City Council 8/19/97). 26.Agenda Item No. 11B. Project Prioritization. This prioritization exercise is one that we have used as a management tool for the past couple years with City Council and it has worked very well. Note in the memo from Director Last that the request with this distribution is to confirm that everything that needs to be ranked is included in the list. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO RANK THE PROJECTS AT THIS TIME. We will compile a complete list with attached support pages and forward those to you next week for you to rank. After receiving the rankings from Council and compiling them, we will discuss the outcomes at the June Retreat. Feel free to call me, Shana or Greg should you have any questions on this process. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 14 OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 27.Update on Star-Telegram/Official newspaper issue. This item was not placed on the City Council agenda for the June 2 meeting since there has been a meeting scheduled with the Star-Telegram for 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, June 16, at the northeast office. Mayor Stacy has asked that any Councilmember who wants to attend the meeting, or give input into the preparation for the meeting, let he or I know. It would probably appear inappropriate for City Council to consider changes until we have had a chance to meet with the Star- Telegram. In a related matter, Councilmember Kendall has requested that we provide a brief summary of the financial contribution the Star-Telegram has made to the City of Southlake in recent (beyears. See the memo attached hereto from Public Information Officer Tracy Southers, listing Star-Telegrams contributions to the City. Notice this only includes contributions to the municipal corporation City, not the community through other areas, e.g., Carroll Education Foundation, etc. 28.Question concerning appointment to Youth Park Board. A question has been raised as to the appropriateness of appointing Jonathan Edmondson to the Youth Park Board. The question centered on how the members of the Youth Park Board are any different from the Senior Advisory Commission, and whether or not Section 2.13 (the nepotism provision) of the Charter applies. There is no question that Section 2.13 clearly prohibits the appointment of family members of the City Council, Municipal Judge, or City Manager "...to any office, position or clerkship or other service of the City...." The intent of this provision is very obvious: to prevent the collective you (and me) from appointing relatives to key positions in the City Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 15 and thereby having a political machine in control of all municipal areas of the community. At the time of the original Charter, there were very few boards and commissions. However, the Charter envisioned (see Section 3.02) that the Council will from time to time create other boards, and that all board members shall be approved by the City Council. The Charter never envisioned that the City Council would create committees such as the Southlake Youth Advisory Commission or the Youth Park Board, two "boards" of the City established, ostensibly, as a way to get young people involved in City government to some extent, but mostly to give them a sense of inclusiveness in the community. At a time when young people across the country are being alienated by authority, we have taken steps to draw them in. Yes, City Council appoints them. The ordinance (No. 610) calls for SYAC members to be appointed by CISD trustees and the Council (although this past year we did something different in order to get more young people involved, and it worked; we will amend the ordinance to reflect the process changes prior to September). The Park Board Ordinance (No. 646) also calls for City Council appointments, after recommendation from an interview committee comprised of one City Council member, one Park and Recreation Board member, one member of the staff, and one member of SPDC. There are two basic differences between the Youth Park Board and the "regular" boards, e.g., the Senior Advisory commission. One is as discussed above. Additionally, the Senior Advisory Commission makes recommendations to the City Council directly. By ordinance, the Youth Park Board is an advisory board to the Park Board. To summarize: • Yes, a literal reading of Section 2.13 would prohibit a child of a Councilmember (or Municipal Court Judge or City Manager) from serving on the Youth Park Co.f Board. • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 16 • Our attempts to involve youth in government have been initiated for purposes beyond soliciting input; thus I believe they should be considered "special" and not held to the same rules as other (traditional) boards. • It appears that we have inadvertently created a situation with the way we have drafted our youth participation ordinances which run counter with what we have intended to do, thus, it would be my recommendation that we amend the ordinance accordingly so they do not conflict with the Charter. 29. Special Meeting -- June 9. Don't forget that we have scheduled a special City Council meeting for June 9, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. to discuss the rezoning and concept plan for The Remington. As you are aware, the owner/applicant (Lifestyles, Inc.) is requesting "S-P-2" (tiso, zoning for a senior adult living complex to include tri-plex and quadra-plex villas, a personal care facility, a nursing care facility, and senior multi-family units. The property is located south of the intersection of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and West Jellico Circle. 30.June Retreat. Again, the retreat is scheduled for June 25 and 26 at the Solana Education Center. You will receive an agenda soon, but in the meantime, you can anticipate the following schedule: June 25 1:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m., Council "Leveling Course" Staff is setting aside time for a Council Orientation, to bring new Councilmembers up to speed on current projects and other relevant issues. All Councilmembers are welcome. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 17 5:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., Retreat Topics This portion of the retreat will be set aside for discussion of organizational issues, including the multi year financial plan. June 26 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m., Retreat Topics This portion of the retreat will cover a variety of topics, including the capital improvement program, public works programs, the staff work plan, and Council goal setting. Note: The CISD has expressed an interest in having a joint meeting with City Council during our retreat. We could do this during lunch, e.g., from 11:30 - 1:30. What are (lire your thoughts? If this will not work, we could hold a separate joint meeting at a later date. Keep in mind that the primary purpose of the Retreat is to discuss policy issues and programs which will be forthcoming as part of the budget process. Time will be limited, but please contact Assistant City Manager Shana Yelverton if you have suggestions for the Retreat. Staff will try to cover as much information as possible during these two days. 31. DMN Article -- Firefighter Recruitment. You may have read the article in the Dallas Morning News, attached to my memo, about seven cities joining forces to recruit and hire firefighters. If you saw the article you noticed that the City of Southlake is not participating in this particular joint effort. Your packet contains a memorandum from Director Campbell explaining his position on joint efforts for recruitment and hiring. As he points out, Southlake is amenable to participating in joint efforts which save the City time and money. When it comes to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 18 recruitment and hiring of DPS employees, however, he has strong concerns. Some of his concerns are based on the experience of the multi-agency program for processing candidates for the position of police officer, the Police Agency Combined Testing (PACT) program. Director Campbell's position on this subject is clearly documented in the packet items he has provided, particularly page three of the memo from Gary Gregg, Deputy Director of Police Services. Please contact Director Campbell if you have questions. 32.Parks Update. The transition in the Parks and Recreation Department is going well. Below you will find information regarding some of the important projects for the Department: Lie •TPWD Grant Status - As you know, the City of Southlake was awarded a $500,000 grant for the development of Bob Jones Park. Kevin Hugman, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation, and Park Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry recently made a trip to Austin to visit with the staff of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. This was an extremely productive meeting. Not only did the "new" staff make important contacts, they were able to clarify outstanding obligations the City has to meet in order to sign the contract with TPWD. We have sent correspondence to TPWD confirming that we have met the requirements and requesting a signed contract. We anticipate bringing you the contract at your June 16 meeting. Questions about the grant should be directed to Kevin Hugman. •Bob Jones Soccer Fields - We have heard concerns expressed by the Grapevine Southlake Soccer Association regarding our timeline for opening soccer fields. Perhaps you have also been approached with questions. Final review of the irrigation plans is Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 19 anticipated to be completed by early next week, at which point specifications will be developed. Staff will seek bids as soon as possible. Keep in mind that the SPDC budgeted to sod half of the fields, which we plan to open this fall. The other half will be hydromulched, and temporary irrigation used, as necessary, to ensure that this process is successful. The hydromulched fields may not be ready for play in the fall, but were not anticipated to be when the project began. Please contact Kevin Hugman or Ben Henry with questions about the soccer fields. •West Beach Lot Acquisition - The City has now acquired all of the lots needed for Phase I of the Bob Jones Park project, with the exception of two. The property owner of lot 27, block 15 (which fronts on White Chapel) wants $10,000 for a single lot (we have been paying about $3,000 for comparable lots at West Beach), so it appears this lot will require condemnation. Note that this is one of two lots that I am aware of in which we have known the property owner, but have been unable to reach agreement. In any case, we are pleased to let you know that Phase I lot acquisition is essentially completed, as indicated on the map in your packet (Phase I is the area north of Bluebird as highlighted). Our next step is to begin the process for Phase II. We anticipate that approximately 40 lots will require condemnation, most by publication since the property owners are either unknown, deceased or otherwise unavailable to negotiate with the city. We should be able to wrap up our lot acquisition efforts by October. Contact Shana Yelverton with questions about West Beach lot acquisition. •Bicentennial Park Expansion - Our work to modify the drainage plan for the site is almost complete, and we anticipate bringing the SPDC and Council a contract with Pittman Construction in June. The groundbreaking will follow shortly thereafter. Contact Kevin Hugman or Ben Henry with questions about the project. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 20 Note that we are putting the finishing touches on acquiring the two "out parcels" required for this project. Our exchange with Crossroads Square is almost complete (paperwork is with the Title Company), and the Wilkinson property will be acquired soon as we discussed previously. Please let Shana Yelverton know if you have any questions about the land acquisition. 33.Kettering Response Letter. Upon acceptance of the public access easement for the road in Cedar Oaks Estates, staff has prepared a letter responding to questions posed by residents living near the new development. This response letter is addressed to Mr. Steve Kettering, and a copy is attached to this memo FYI. 34.NCTCOG General Assembly/Workshop for Mayors and Councilmembers. The 32nd Annual General Assembly meeting of the North Central Texas Council of Governments will be held Friday, June 5, 1998 at the Arlington Hilton. This is the annual meeting hosted by the NCTCOG for the membership to elect officers and directors to the Executive Board. Three regional awards will also be presented during the program. If time permits, I would encourage you to attend the General Assembly. NCTCOG will also host a workshop for elected officials that morning. This workshop, which will feature presentations on "Guidelines for Councilmembers," "Planning and Zoning Issues," and "Legal Powers and Responsibilities," will begin at 8:00 a.m. and conclude in time to attend the General Assembly luncheon. Networking can only help! If you would like to attend, please let City Secretary Sandy LeGrand know. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 21 35.NCTCOG Population Estimates Have Been Published. You may know that we had been provided with preliminarily population estimates earlier this year. NCTCOG has now published the estimated population of Southlake at 19,250. 36.Race Weekend. Brace yourself for yet another event at the Texas Motor Speedway scheduled for the weekend of June 5 and 6. Although these races do not generate as much traffic as the Busch Grand National or NASCAR Winston Cup Series races, we do anticipate congestion during the early morning hours of the weekend, and in the afternoon at the conclusion of the races. Extra staff will be scheduled as needed to provide for traffic management and code enforcement. Questions about law enforcement during this weekend should be directed to Director Billy Campbell. (See attached memo from Director Campbell.) L 37. Senior Activity Center Progress Report. The first month of operation of the new Senior Activity Center has been focused on fine tuning the facility to meet the multi-faceted needs of civic meeting space, volunteer educational/training programs, and providing a wide variety of programming opportunities for seniors. Community Services Coordinator Nona Whitehead has taken on the responsibility of managing the center and coordinating programming. Her primary responsibilities to date are program development, working with the volunteers, recording data, publicity, facility scheduling and maintenance. She has also assumed the responsibility of staff liaison to the Senior Advisory Commission. As you can see from the attached newsletter, Senior Scene, and the calendar of events, Nona is already doing a great job of offering a variety of social activities for Southlake's senior residents. Health services programming is off to a good start with 25 seniors Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest LiMay 29, 1998 Page 22 participating in a vascular health screening. Local health providers are donating their time for programs, and Fire Services staff have also been available to the seniors. It is exciting to see the City of Southlake offering new services to this segment of our population. 38.Economic Development Activities. Following are some recent activities from the Economic Development staff. Feel free to contact Economic Development Specialist Kate Barlow or Director Last if you have questions or would like additional information. • Commercial Development Roundtable. On Friday, May 15, staff hosted a roundtable attended by 19 members of the development community, three Councilmembers (Mayor Stacy, Scott Martin, and Ronnie Kendall), and two Planning and Zoning Ler, Commissioners (Jim Murphy and Ann Creighton). Topics included: updates on proposed, under revision and recently approved ordinances; update on public works projects; master planning issues; and other economic development related projects in process or under consideration. In particular, the traffic count study in progress was well received. Participants discussed undertaking a demographic study of Southlake and the surrounding areas, and Councilmember Kendall advocated conducting a citizen survey to identify the types of businesses desired by Southlake residents. Staff will work with members of the development community who volunteered to study a demographic analysis and a citizen survey. Kate will prepare a list of staff who are involved in the numerous aspects of development including representatives from Public Works, Public Safety, and Community Development. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 23 • Home Based Business Breakfast. Kate will participate in the June 3 Southlake Chamber of Commerce-sponsored Home Based Business Breakfast scheduled for 9:00 a.m. at Bicentennial Park. The Chamber has invited all home based businesses identified by economic development staff in our business database. • Northeast Tarrant Economic Development Professionals Gathering. Local professionals are working on a compilation of statistics for the 14 cities within Northeast Tarrant County. We have discussed various sources of information and will finalize the source for each of 23 statistics ranging from population to property tax rates to total labor force. This data may be useful information for the area demographic study. • The Business Press articles. The Business Press celebrated its tenth anniversary with a tkirmir special publication highlighting major development and business events since 1988. While the publication focused on Fort Worth, Arlington and trends within the financial, health care, and manufacturing industries, an article on Northeast Tarrant County development is attached. Also from The Business Press is a summary of Tarrant County's fastest-growing cities with Southlake in the first place position based on percentage change in population between 1997 and 1998. Please note that The Dallas Morning News Northeast Tarrant section is continuing to provide coverage of Southlake's progress through various charts provided by staff. • Southlake Town Square Tenant Update. As we move closer to Southlake Town Square's opening date, staff will provide articles on tenants. Attached to my memo is The Business Press' article on Noodle Kidoodle's commitment to Southlake Town Square. Noodle Kidoodle is a retailer of educational children's products. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest May 29, 1998 Page 24 39. Continental/Peytonville Realignment and CISD ROW dedication. I have mentioned to several of you the difficulty Capital Project Coordinator Shawn Poe encountered during his presentation at the last school board meeting, Tuesday, May 19. We have addressed most of the concerns raised by the Board. Some we cannot do. I will be attending the Board meeting Monday night along with Shawn. Hopefully, we can put this to rest. I will let you know Tuesday night. 40.Also attached to my memo is/are: • a memo from Director Campbell regarding house fire at 503 Potomac Place appreciation letters C Stuff Extension Numbers: Barlow, Kate, Economic Development Specialist, ext. 776 Campbell, Billy, Director DPS, ext. 730 Carpenter, Chris, Planner, ext. 866 Gandy, Karen, Zoning Administrator, ext. 743 Harper, Ron, City Engineer, ext. 779 Hawk, Curtis E., ext. 701 Heath, Lou Ann, Director of Finance, ext. 716 Henry, Ben, Parks Planning and Construction Superintendent, ext. 824 Hugman, Kevin, Interim Parks and Recreation Director, ext. 757 Imm, Darcey, Assistant to the City Manager, ext. 759 Killough, Dennis, Senior Planner, ext. 787 Last, Greg, Community Development Director, ext. 750 LeGrand, Sandra, City Secretary, ext. 704 Sarakaitis, Stefanie, Comprehensive Planner, ext. 753 Wilson, Garland, Deputy Director Fire Services, ext. 735 Whitehead, Bob, Director of Public Works, ext. 740 Whitehead, Nona, Community Services Coordinator, ext. 834 Yelverton, Shana, Assistant City Manager, ext. 705 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tracy Southers, Public Information Officer SUBJECT: Fort Worth Star-Telegram Community Contributions Below are the contributions the Fort Worth Star-Telegram has made to community events in the City of Southlake during the past two years. I _ 40th Anniversary Celebration Birthday Party: Sept. 29, 1996 $500 -cash $2000 - advertisements Celebration Southlake (Kite Festival): May 3, 1997 $1250 -cash $2000 - advertisements $4000 - 1000 kites Night on the Town: Sept. 27, 1997 $1200 - cash $2000 - advertisements Kite Festival 1996 $1000 - cash $1700 - advertisements 200 kites Kite Festival 1998 $500 - cash $1500 - advertisements Senior Activity Center Volunteer Appreciation Ceremony $350 -half of full page ad recognizing volunteers (City paid other half) Parks & Recreation Activities $500 - Concert in Park Keep Southlake Beautiful Waterscape $1250 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM +`,,,, May 29, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Interlocal PACT Testing There are several concerns that I have historically considered when dealing with multiple agency hirings. I have asked Deputy Director Gregg to illustrate those disparities and also provide a list of other multi-agency cooperation efforts that do provide an efficient or effective service to our community and its taxing entity. Deficiencies in PACT testing result because the City of Southlake, typically, looks for more qualified applicants than most cities. We do not have low applicant turnout when we advertise (especially in fire service) and our current testing allows us to pick the number one candidate from our list, as opposed to the thirty-fifth candidate on a joint list. There are probably some initial cost savings in multi-agency type testing, however, that savings could be easily nullified, and possibly even provide a greater negative impact,by not having the opportunity to choose the right person for the right job. Please see the attached memos for more information. BC/bls Attachments L City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 27, 1998 TO: Billy Campbell, Director, Public Safety FROM: Gary Gregg, Deputy Director, Police Services SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreements and PACT Testing We have realized that cost savings exist when agencies are able to consolidate expensive, redundant or in-frequently used but necessary services. We are involved with a host of other agencies in a variety of endeavors as indicated by the following list. • FATS- Firearms Training Simulator. Use of this simulator, owned by the Federal Government Protective Service, saves an average of$75 for each hour used. • NERT- Northeast Explosives Response Team. Bomb disposal and post blast investigation unit. Used in investigation of suspicious devices. • Tarrant County Arson Task Force. Used in cause and origin investigations during suspicious fires or in large losses. • Northeast Street Crimes Unit. Made up of various officers from the northeast Tarrant County area to investigate juvenile and Asian gangs. Assists in investigating and identification of known gang members. Also works on directed crimes in a particular area, i.e., rise in motor vehicle thefts. • Alliance for Children. In process of constructing a center in Northeast Tarrant County which will allow for the investigation, interviewing, and medical examination of children believed to be victims or sexual abuse or assault. • Northeast HazMat. Small members of each individual fire service are trained in hazardous materials control and mitigation. Costs are shared by each agency and staffing is available during events without depleting the resources of a single individual fire service. • Tarrant and Denton Counties cooperative purchasing agreement. Purchasing on bulk contracts saves when purchases are combined. • Northeast Radio Consortium. We propose to join this consortium of northeast Tarrant County cities in an effort to lower the maintenance costs of 800 MHz radios and associated batteries and equipment. • HGAC. Houston Galveston Council of Governments. We make major purchases each year of motor vehicles from HGAC. These vehicles vary from police patrol cars to large dump trucks (1.0, and other types of equipment. HGAC is often able to beat State Contract pricing or provide an avenue for purchase of items the state does not bid. Memo to Director Campbell Interlocal Agreements and PACT Testing May 27, 1998 Page 2 We are not however a member of PACT or of the proposed fire hiring consortium. PACT The police departments of Bedford, Hurst, Euless and North Richland Hills are in a multi-agency program to attract and process qualified candidates for the position of police officer. Police Agency Combined Testing (P.A.C.T.) takes place each May, on two days, for the purpose of compiling an eligibility list of police officer candidates. With prior approval, those applicants who live more than 200 miles from the P.A.C.T. area may take both tests on the same day. Disqualification by one department does not eliminate them from consideration by the other agencies. Basic Requirements • Citizenship: Must be a legal U.S. resident. • Age: Applicants must be at least 21 years of age at the time of employment. • Character: Good moral character, stable employment history, valid driver's license • Physical Requirements: Weight in proportion to height. La, • Vision correctable to 20/20 and free of color blindness. • General good health. Normal hearing. • Education Guidelines: All cities require 30 hours college. This requirement may be waived by the cities of Euless and North Richland Hills if the applicant has 2 years police experience with the same department immediately prior to making application. Under this set of guidelines, TCLEOSE certification at time of hire is not mandatory. Military police service does not qualify under this system of testing other than to award points on test ranking. The PACT test results also sets eligibility for one year after ranking. After written and physical results are posted the eligibility list is formed. Agencies then contact candidates in order of posting and run backgrounds prior to oral interviews, chief interviews or conditional offers of employment. Potentially, an agency such as ours could be locked into the eligibility list that was established eight or nine months prior because the list must be exhausted prior to a retest. Euless currently has openings they have held for three months due to not wanting to experience the "dregs" factor because the list is almost one year old. Each department then performs their own series of tests, including polygraph, physical and psychological. There are several concerns that surface during an evaluation of this process. L Memo to Director Campbell Interlocal Agreements and PACT Testing May 27, 1998 Page 3 Concerns: The PACT agreement is designed to draw young, inexperienced people to law enforcement and places no value whatsoever on previous law enforcement experience. 1. Agencies using PACT face a certainty that many of the applicants must be sponsored to the police academy, thus prolonging the time and costs before an applicant can report to work. 2. Hiring must be structured then around dates of police academies, not at the agencies hiring requirements. 3. Although the testing is combined, agencies find themselves competing directly against each other, if they anticipate hiring shortly after the posting of the list. 4. Many agencies will let vacancies go unfilled late in the year rather than take marginal applicants from the bottom. 5. The written and physical testing is performed in a combined manner. All other evaluations are still performed by each agency, often in duplicate, other than for backgrounds which are shared, because agencies are all trying to hire the same applicants at the same time. In actuality, the PACT process only makes it more convenient for the applicant to test for four agencies at once and reduces the costs of the agencies because they are able to share the costs of a professionally written test. There are probably a number of other cost saving agreements that we are party to that were not listed today. We however, do not feel that the current PACT combine would be beneficial to the city. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. GG/gg C:\WP WIN60\WPDOCS\MEMO\MEMO253.DOC The Dallas Morning News: Northeast Tarrant News Page 1 of 2 I 1p g , Northeast w Tarrant go` jipe Slime SAvch Help ,> reed tk;.,.,Site Map Hanle R""t`nk '1 7 cities join in hiring, a Northeast Tarrant The From Page recruiting in the News Metro areas: National • Arlington Fire departments set 1st tests for June international ional • Garland/Mesquite Texas& inw-es • Lewisville/Denton 05/23/98 Me#x Man_..._....... • Metro Plus ■ Northeast Tarrant i3usirt�iss _M_•.._.,_ By Donna Logan Wisdom/The Dallas Morning News ■ Park Cities SetenitaiTech • Plano Seven northeast Tarrant County fire departments Sports Day The Arts Special areas: are combining their recruiting and hiring efforts, /es • '98 Elections Voters creating the Northeast Fire Agencies Combined Lifesty Grid® Guide Testing, to attract a larger pool of qualified Opinion ` Politics index applicants and to reduce testing costs. • Traffic Report $l • White Rock Lake Cities participating in the cooperative effort are Weather Help/FAQBedford, Colleyville, Euless, Grapevine, Keller, he __'__._M_w North Richland Hills and Richland Hills. The first joint testing for open positions is tentatively set Advsrtiairig for the end of June. The alliance is an extension of Classified acts existing support programs that include training, a hazardous-materials team and a bomb unit. "We think it's going to increase the number of x applicants we can choose from and save money on testing," said Division Chief Chuck Blankenship of Keller Fire and Rescue. With shared advertising and recruiting, officials hope to alleviate some problems that have plagued the departments. The neighboring cities, which are often hiring simultaneously, have experienced low applicant turnout when testing dates have conflicted. In 1996, 17 of 22 registered applicants tested for Keller Fire and Rescue; in 1997, 24 of 32 took the tests. The joint testing will also reduce the personnel and overtime pay involved in administering written, psychological and physical tests. "We are trying to do everything we can to accommodate and encourage applicants," Chief Blankenship said. http://www.dallasnews.cotn/metro-ne-tarrant-nf/net18.htm 5/26/98 The Dallas Morning News: Northeast Tarrant News Page 2 of 2 In addition to the financial benefits of sharing advertising and testing, the cooperative should reach more applicants from a broader background. "We thought we should pool our resources and share the cost," said David Anderson, deputy fire chief in Grapevine. "We're able to reach farther than the the North Texas area now, and we're able to solicit to all the fire academies. Applicants are more likely to come here to test for seven cities instead of just one." Firefighters who apply can specify which cities they are interested in working for, and once a department makes an offer, the others will not be able to pursue the candidate. The departments have similar requirements and offer comparable benefits and salaries - about $2,200 to $3,600 a month, depending on experience and training. "It's still going to be competitive for some of the top positions," Chief Anderson said. "But overall, we will have created a list . . . that's very thorough. It's going to give us a broad view of the applicant." Donna Logan Wisdom can be reached on the Internet at dwisdom(dallasnews.corn. • Back to Top • Send a letter to the editor about this story • Back to Northeast Tarrant indexes ....................................................................................................................... a .... :. 1 Sll:a 4 tYk err A,14,SSeloSutssc:lase rsed batii ... .............: T\MrJM:bM+M.KxWi�i�v,:iir{r+(r:J.L+.{<x.?+rlxrH.d:L{xxxrr.:lxMxtttN,.j+!!K2?KM+AYfxH Ff.+/.{MKtxrrry-.:':. ...... © 1998 The Dallas Morning News INEEMECEME 's. L http://www.dallasnews.com/metro-ne-tarrant-nf/net 18.htm 5/26/98 City of Southlake �U thlaAdministrative Offices • May 29, 1998 Mayor: Rick Stacy Mayor Pro Tern: Mr. Steve Kettering W.Ralph Evans 1505 Oak Lane Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: Southlake, Texas 76092 David A.Hams Councilmembers: Dear Mr. Kettering: Wayne Moffat Pamela A.Muller Gary Fawks I have waited to respond to your letter of April 8, 1998 because the Council was Scott F. Martin not scheduled to act on the drive issue until the May 19, 1998 City Council meeting. As you may have heard, the developer and Council were able to agree City Manager to dedication of the drive as a public access easement. This will make the drive Curtis E.Hawk a "city street" as you and your neighbors requested at the April 7 City Council Assistant City Manager. meeting. Shana K.Yelverton City Secretary: To address the concerns you articulated in your letter, I will follow your format: Lndra L.LeGrand 1) Jurisdiction The speed limit on this road will be the same as other neighborhood streets, 30 mph. Since it is a public access easement, you would not be trespassing if you were to drive on this road. If an accident occurs, the driver at fault would be liable. 2) Emergency Emergency vehicles will respond to these addresses. As with other areas of the city, emergency vehicles might block the road, depending on the severity of the incident or accident. The fire hydrant will be owned by the city. The homes will be accessed off of the drive, with addresses assigned accordingly. Once addresses assigned, 911 responds to the address from which the call is received. 3) Drainage Given that the city will assume the responsibility of the road as a public access easement, we have asked the developer for 10 feet beyond the edge of pavement so that we can plan for and handle drainage. The city has not yet planned how the drainage will be handled, but provisions will certainly be made for carrying the water to Sleepy Hollow to be picked L.., up in the bar ditches there. 1725 East Southlake Blvd. • Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 329-1747 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' L Mr. Steve Kettering May 29, 1998 Page Two 4) Sewer The sanitary sewer which has been installed is designed as a part of the overall Cedar Creek Neighborhood Sewer project. Residents that adjoin the sewer may connect for the $1,300 fee. 5) Mail Mail boxes will be located in the front yards of the homes and not along Sleepy Hollow. Addresses have yet to be assigned. 6) Trash Trinity Waste Services will pick up the garbage curbside, as in other areas of the city. We have been assured that the pavement is wide (roe enough to accommodate the trucks. 7) Maintenance Since this roadway has been accepted by the city as a public access easement, it will be maintained by the city, at the city's expense. 8) Deed Restrictions Deed restrictions are a civil matter, outside the jurisdiction of the city. Questions about the restrictions should be directed to the developer. I hope these answers provide the information you and your neighbors need. Should you have additional questions about the road, please contact Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, at 481-5581 ext. 741. Sincerely, Rick Stacy • Mayor L West Beach Addition Last Revision - 5/28/98 EP1411111111. 11. 119141111.111111lili20 1iiiiiM1Milli e...._•,:. . CK DR IL /MIL- Oy ell1111111111 1111111111111 '0'MIMI %, NM 20 MIN 26 M NUS&au maszkii, F 'MIMI alai Eng IIIIIMMI MINIUM MESE II 50 4489 11 MASAO 4` 41, 7 Illal MEI „MUNN 111 ma ,,g IN 40 e...! ill Firew alIIMMIll 1:1 Nam mum rd'am.i.eami . ii losmiza . II MUNN AI A. MUISINI =mon -AIMINIM IMINIME1 5:1101111M11 :U MEM CM 'Ma ILI- AMR= NENE= ...iimil ,0 ntomor -Immo ifp.1 =NM AMIN AI= NE11111 "Ma NI A 8 AM MEM 72 MIM MMoMrUAaIlNEeSaDSrV _,A,M...,At,NIMNI 0_j A, t a. mryg;. I.I'3I IIII .44 110i9,1MN1M11E2NE1I : 9 A 4 oNNW uuu . . iM • \ RI0, nl E0gl IrliaD raillEill 401111 -' ° 14 -13 MEI - ANN 0 15 144 1441 I--, , um kiiiirMIMMI III; :Iimi 36 Zliiiii. INF: •I 8 5 4 .1cm= urn WNW ;Aim= ^. imi „limn= r' ill 20 33 r irg 31 21 37 30 , Legend 11111EgittEIN III 22 31 29 abMir limo 0011 23 30 28 illb. „WA Ir 11 29 rhir 24 29 27 _&At% El City Owned Properties 5_Maw .sras I it r — -•uvAik i AMIE A -MOO „ Air El Under Contract IIIII Ea Under Condemnation ,2 §1.11111111 I IllittigitilhilligilltikA n11111111- 1111111'"1 El Private Owned Properties :A Within Future Park-To r A 1.;ILA Be Aquired 1 6,1 g 11111 c IllIIIIIIII- ill 11 El Streets Never Opened 5 40 35 TROUT 111111111101 12 1.3 14 16 17 1E1 1g 20 21 22 23 24 25 • 27 28 25 3. 31 32 33 31 36 Ililli.°41,16 Percent of Acquired Land in West Beach DRUM CIRCLE SO Addition Based on Total Acreage 1 2 3 t 5 8 7 8 9 ...46 W 4' i 90.1% NW Z NIL Trot t I 2.1% -0 -,9151-716 t 14 13 0.41 CRAPPE TRAL iiNiiiiiitritik , 43% Denton County --- iiiiiiiiittillii 1PIP Tarrant County - r 11111111311 . _111000.- EMMEN All N moons -OM p W -.W.- E /‘k II/I 1.7 g PP 1 Scale = 1":400' City of Southlake ri..LI:, .Af,...uc n...rfmant • C City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 4000, TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Texas Motor Speedway Event June 03-06, 1998 Please find the attached memo from Lt. Barry Hinkle on the Texas Motor Speedway event. Having experienced several of these races, we feel that we are contributing the proper resources towards the successful regulation of race patrons in our community and we continue to reassess our resource allocations as we encounter these races. (6, BC/bls Attachment lobe L . ri City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM j s ~I ` ' t ' ill a"'' May 27, 1998 � ���;�! - ? 98 To: Gary Gregg, Deputy Director Police Services From: Barry Hinkle, Lieutenant Police Services Subject: Texas Motor Speedway Event June 03-06, 1998 The truck races will begin with registration on Wednesday June 03, 1998 at 1000 hours. This particular event is open to the drivers only, and there is no anticipated participation from fans expected. We will not be providing any coverage on that date. Thursday June 04, 1998 time trials will begin at 1000 hours. Fan participation is estimated at 20,000. This estimation is based on a"Sporadic"arrival. Committee meetings revealed that there is little threat to local traffic on this date. No special details are planned for this event. On Friday June 05, 1998, the first racing event will be held. Gates will open at 1000. Fan participation is estimated at 65,000. Fort Worth P.D. will begin a partial contra-flow at about 1700 hours, as the race is scheduled to start at 2030 hours. The concern here is that this will also be our rush hour traffic period. Fort worth has dedicated 45 personnel to conduct traffic direction during this event. This race is scheduled to be complete by 2230 hours. We Know for certain that there will be no delays for the race start, as it will be a televised race. Our plans will be to have all six (6) members of the traffic division on the street by 1600 hours. The traffic division, under the direction of Sergeant Daniels, will address the event until about 0200 hours. On Saturday June 06, 1998 the gates will open at 1000. Fan participation is estimated at 85,000. There is a full contra-flow in and out for this event which is scheduled to be complete by 2230 hours. Our plans will be to have all six (6) members of the traffic division on the street by 1600 hours. The traffic division will address the event until about 0200 hours. Although we feel that we have adequately staffed for this event, Sergeant Daniels will be keeping me informed of any need for additional resources through the duration of these event. I am available for any questions or concerns. BLH/blh CC: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety C:\My Documents\Speedway.doc SENIOR ...,, ... SCENE puth(®k- frith al JUNE ISSUE Information for Seniors in Southlake, Published by the Community Services Division Senior Activity Center Hours of Operation New 6\141.4 Monday - Thursday 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. for June 481-2776 Do you need a ride to the The ribbon has been cut, programs have begun, and we are Senior Activity Center? beginning to feel at home in our wonderful new Senior Activity Center. Several new programs that you have Please call the center at 481- requested will begin in June. Please look inside for more 2776 the day before and we information on the following opportunities: will try to arrange for a volunteer to pick you up. Monday: *Congratulations to Computer Classes, Party and Duplicate Bridge CTew Senior Advisory Commission Members! Tuesday: June 2 - Senior Gardener's Club Linda Moore 5/2000 Jeannie Alexander 5/2000 Wednesday: Bill Cosgrove 5/2000 Matalyn Smith 5/2000 Dominoes Club & Pinochle Players Betsy Horowitz (alt) 5/1999 Wellness Wednesday adds new Health Providers, Tom Ward (alt) 5/1999 June 10 - Golden Medicare (free) Lunch Program These members join Fran Thursday: Weiser, Martha Greenberg, Gentle Exercise and Wanda Buschman who will serve through May of 1999. Beginning Line Dance 55 Alive Class Dick Johnston has retired as June 11, Wax Museum Trip Chairman of this commission June 25 - Investment Club and the staff and seniors alike wish to express our appreciation for his many Friday . yours of work on the behalf of June 19 - Lunch Bunch with Rose Hampshire in Southlake. ( ,jniors . Sunday: Grief Support Group -.: *Intro to Computers Don't Be Afraid of Your Wellness Wednesday Programs „,-- Mouse! for the Month of June ,vionday - June 1, 10:30 a.m., ""✓Don Owen will be teaching the Wednesday, June 3 - 12:30 p.m. - Dr. Kloesel first of(2) two session group classes, which will begin at Dr. Gregory Kloesel, Therapeutic Optometrist, of Southlake Eye 10:30 a.m. Call Nona to sign Associates at 500 W. Southlake Blvd., will present a slide show on up or use the sign up sheet in "Your Ever Changing Eyes." Participants are encouraged to bring a the Eubanks Room. In sack lunch and share a meal after the presentation. addition, Don will be at the Center by 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, June 10 - 10:30 a.m. - Medicare Program Mondays in June by request for S his one on one introduction to computers. A special presentation of Aetna's Golden Medicare Plan includes a FREE LUNCH and door prizes. You must pre-register by June 8 in order to have the lunch provided. Call 481-5581 ext. 834 or 481-2776 ♦Exercise Opportunities to register. Gentle Exercise Wednesday, June • Thursdays 10:00 a.m. 10 - 1.00 p.m. - Dr. Whitehead Thelma Jones has volunteered to teach a Gentle Exercise class Dr. Hunt Whitehead, D.C. of Whitehead Chiropractic is scheduled for second Wednesdays beginning June 10. Dr. Whitehead's initial each Thursday morning, beginning June 4. services will include personal guidance for stretching and beginning June 4. strengthening exercises to improve mobility, reduce pain, and improve Line Dance with Jerre overall health. Dr. Whitehead also plans to take Blood Pressure Harrell readings. June 4 and June 11 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, June 17 - 12 Noon - Lunch With Your Jerre Harrell, a well-known Nurse dance instructor is this area for many years, has volunteered to A FREE Heart Healthy lunch will be provided and Marlene Cupit, teach 4 free sessions of R.N. of Back to Basics Healthcare, will present a program on keeping beginning Line Dance. This is your heart and circulation system going strong. She will plan to take a popular way to exercise and Blood Pressure readings and answer your questions. stay active. Please call 481- 2776 to sign up. Wednesday, June 24 - 12 Noon - Magnetic •Senior Investment Club Therapy June 25 - 11:00 a.m. June Haney will present a program related to wellness and the use of Aloha Payne has volunteered to magnets. In addition to the Vital Signs service provided by our DPS explain how an Investment personnel Club works, and how to start one. The Vital Signs nyone who may be interested This program has moved to Tuesday June 23 between 10:00 and m joining this group should 11:00. Drop in for a variety of Southlake Seniors activities and check plan to attend this meeting. those vitals! Blood Sugar testing will also be available. NEWS CLIPPLNG Source: The Business Press DATE: Week of May 15, 1998 Special 10th Anniversary Issue takes flight Northeast Tarrant development� By BELINDA WILLIS THE BUSINESS PRESS A$300 million east runway opened in t:iranger points to the city of fi- Grapevine as further proof the airport late 1996,easing congestion and signi ince its early days as an army cantly increasing airport capacity.When is an economic draw.Commercial and outpost.Fort Worth and its the eighth runway is completed on the residential development in the city Tarrant County neighbors have airport's west side in the next two years, along the airport's northwest border relied on transportation as a D/FW will become the only airport with grew significantly in the last five key to the area's economic and the capability to have four simultaneous years. Even Grapevine Mills develop- community growth.Today in Tarrant landings and four simultaneous takeoffs. ers cited the airport's proximity as a County,history is repeating itself. Projections call for D/FW to have 1.4 key factor in selecting the city for the The Northeast Tarrant corridor saw million operations annually,51 million outlet mall. more growth in the last 10 years than any passengers and 2 million tons of cargo other sector of the county.The cpeve- routed by the year 2015—making it the From the ground up ties of Southlake,Westlake,Grapevine busiest airport in the world. yet even as the airport was contribut and Colleyville were barely known by Those statistics have been a magnet for ing to the economic growth of its most of the rest of the county 20 years businesses and jobs,airport officials say. owner and neighbor cities,D/FW itself ago. Now they represent some of the was adding to its infrastructure and "Every one of those jobs created fastest-growing cities in the Metroplex. represents a piece of the economy,"said striving to improve customer service. Fueling the growth along this 20-mile- Jeff Fegan,executive director at D/FW see NORTHEAST on page 27A wide corridor were two major economic Airport. "We strongly believe we do the NORTHEASTfrom a e 5A engines: Dallas/Fort Worth International things we do here to continue to grow the p 8 Airport and the Alliance Airport develop- economy.The impact is a ripple effect Partnering with major restaurants and ment.Acting as virtual bookends,theL throughout the community." retailers,D/FW has given passengers more airports funneled new residents and many choices—at better prices than ever new businesses to these burgeoning Relocating momentum before. communities. Drawn to the transportation rrhe recent debates regarding D/FW i "In the past,the airport's reputation for hubs for their ability to move and distrib- 1 Airport and Love Field have again its food service was not great,"Fegan ute goods to destinations around the said. "We've tried to give customers what United States and the world, corporations called into question whether the corporate landscape in they want.We have a street-pricing policy migrated to Tarrant County. growingso that people at the airport feel as though Once again, location, location, location the Metroplex is a result of the „ was key. airport's allure to domestic and they are getting comparable prices. international businesses. Former The drive for better customer service is Fort Worth Mayor and now also changing the airport's landscape. Reaching record heights - Ground was broken last month on a new e world's second busiest airport has Congresswoman Kay Grangtr doesn't have to be convinced. $2.6 million joint car rental facility on the come into its own over the last several airport's southwest corner.Terminal - "Every time we Rile city of years.Already a powerful element of the expansions are under way to allow Fort Worth] went to companies to lex's economic viability,D/FW get relocations,we knew why we grew a passengers easier access to terminals on grew even stronger as the physical won,and we knew why we lost" either side of International Parkway.On landscape of the airport expanded and an the drawing board is a high-speed people- Granger said."They told us.We increasing number of passengers traveled wanted to know the most mover system connecting all terminals,the through its terminals. D/FW's economic important reason why they came, rental car facility and a future Railtran impact on the region is now at$10.8 station on the airport's south side.All total, and D/FW is at the top.They are billion annually,with more than attracted to the area.But they plans call for the airport to spend as much jobs either directly or indirectly related elated t to as$2 billion over the next 20 years. come because of the airport." the airport. - "What I think has made this airport successful is that we've never said it was good enough,"Granger said."We are constantly changing and improving D/FW. It has always been a great airport,and it will continue to be an economic driver for this region many years from now." r A public-private A :; In the mid-1980s, Ross Perot Jr. flew Air Force Reserve jets at the former '` Carswell Air Force Base,often flying ' s -` (iir, over the 2,500 acres of farm land he m� - -.- 4 fE.: �41 would soon own north ' : 4 % ° ' ' ' ' � of Fort Worth. Perot was � _` ` buying the land as a �, .>. hero Me „ na long-term investment iii -� � for the family's real estate portfolio.But soon,the land purchases 49 would be much more "°'""�"""' than speculative. PEROT - - _mod•,. The Federal Aviation Administration was targeting far north Fort _ Worth as the site for a general aviation ` reliever airport.Perot had the land.The FAA had the need.The city of Fort Worth was keh The Federal Aviation Administration searchingfor some much-needed economic ...5 it ' -� � T k -protected�►t wou�Narke a decade i�o bviid But when officials growth. 1 I1!I(1 t broke"ground fcr Alliance Airport in July 988,it was only o Over the next several years,the perfect 1= short 18 months to completion, thanks to a unique public/ "I "Alliance" transformed the north Fort / .p ,ate partnership among"the FAA,the city of Fort Worth and Worth farm land into what has been called —� Hdh�od Development. The first industrial airport of its kind in the most unique transportation hub and the world,Alliance Airport todoy plays host`to tour'groups from across the " industrial development in the world. globe interested in imitating its sky-high success. 'the FAA didn't even have an industrial —Rachel S. Master airport category for its funding structure," '"rot said."We were breaking new ground. ie FAA wanted to build a 4,000-foot runway and gradually develop into an industrial With the Burlington Northern Santa Fe R.We thou t it was important to begin NORTHEAST from page 27A airpo po 8r intermodal center and automobile with an industrial airport from day one." only thing the city really did was bring distribution center on the west,Interstate Officials broke ground for Alliance water and sewer to the area, something 35W on the cast and an industrial airport Airport in July 1988 after the city completed we would have to do anyway if the in the middle,the Alliance development zoning the land in what was the largest land was developed." began the evolution to its present role. zoning case in Fort Worth and U.S.history. "We really coined the phrase Former Fort Worth Mayor Bob Bolen,who Byaka land and rail 'multimodal'because s - ,_- -d: ." took heat for getting the city involved in what Wth the airport as a catalyst,the that was the best way , g many considered a speculative project,said it Alliance development took offs • to describe it,"said - wasn't hard to see Perot's vision for the Ironically,the first Alliance ect Mike Berry,senior vice '� `-4 development. involved not aviation but rail: president of Perot's "It doesn't take a genius to look at a "We didn't spend a lot of time thinking Hillwood Development map on the wall and see that the only area of the Metroplex where there was about railroads until they[Burlington Corp."People began to no development was the northwest Northern and Santa Fe railroad compa- think of Alliance for its vies]showed up."Perot said."We knew the logistics aspects.We quadrant," Bolen said. When Ross BERRY first talked about putting in an airport rail lines were there,but we were not had rail,we had the focused on that aspect of the development. interstate and we had an airport. It put the there, people said no way, the city But we were market driven.Customers development on the map in a whole , didn't have the funds for that kind of project. So Ross said, `What if I deed come to us and tell us what they need." different arena.The key to it all was the you the land. That could be the city's matching funds for the FAA.' He gave Lit to us. He took a bad rap about all the tax abatements and incentives he was getting for the project. But in fact the first thing that ever happened is they gave us the equivalent of several million dollars worth of property.The see NORTHEAST on page 28A combination of all those elements.We employment at Alliance to reach 21,750 even indirectly had a ship channel by 2010,with the number climbing to because the rail lines and interstate are a 45,250 by 2020. land bridge from many ports." Fort Worth,along with Northeast Tarrant County communities,arc responding by Employment bOOIn expanding infrastructure to the area. The Alliance landscape has been Rooftops dot the landscape as homebuilders transformed over the years to rush to meet the demand for housing.include distribution centers, office Southlake economic development complexes and retail developments.The specialist pecialist Kate Barlow said the city's tenant list reads like a who's who of U.S. population has more than tripled since 1988 and international business and industry: from 6,000 people to 19,250 in 1998.The American Airlines,Federal Express, growth of the area enabled the city to offer Nestle,Nokia,General Mills,JCPenney, municipal sewer. Maytag,Galaxy Aerospace,Mitsubishi, "Since 1990,the city has issued more Texas Instruments,Southwestern Bell and than 3,750 single-family residential —its biggest catch—Intel's Fab 16 plant. building permits,with total permit value of More than 12,000 worketh journey to more than$870 million,"Barlow said. the Alliance region each day.The North "Since 1994,the city has also experienced Texas Council of Governments projects an increase in commercial development." Of course the explosive growth has also created problems,primarily in the area of highway development.Most of the strain has been on Texas 114,which runs eastward across Northeast Tarrant County.Expansion and improvements on the highway are Cie under way. "Of course that area was going to grow anyway,"Berry said."It's hard to know specifically what impact Alliance had on the growth,but I think it's all interrelated." Bolen said a lesson learned from the Alliance project was the role vision must play in a city's and region's i growth.It also turned the spotlight on the importance of public/ private partnelships. "I think it is a perfect , example of public- private partnership,just BOLEN as downtown Fort Worth is an example." Bolen said."Each one came to the table with something and both had an interest in seeing it become successful. People from all over the world come here and envy what we have.The question is, who'll he the next Perot or Bass.Who's going to take the risk next. and where will it her * C NEWS CLIPPING Source: The Business Press DATE: Week of May 15, 1998 Southlake lands radar screen." An Austin store is slated to open in August. Noodle Kidoodle The company plans to open additional Texas stores, but Betuker would not corn- ment on specific locations due to pending children's store negotiations,he said. "We hope to have at least one more store in By KEW RODDA Texas this year,"he added. THE BUSINESS PRESS Noodle Kidoodle Inc.is based in Syosset, N.Y.,and launched its first store in 1993.There SOUTHLAKE—Noodle Kidoodle leased are 35 stores nationwide with three more slated 8.000 square feet at Southlake Town Square to open this year. for its first Tarrant County store. The stores provide nonviolent,creative toys, The educational children's products re- games and other products for children. tailer moved to the Texas market this year. The stores are laid out like a boutique with A store in Dallas and Plano opened this - several departments within a store, Betuker week. The Southlake said.Departments include science and nature; store is expected to open ;.� arts and crafts;plush;video and audio;infants next spring. Southlake • - and preschool; electronic learning; computer Town Square is under _ . 'J.' software;junior sports; building toys;books, 4.construction. )141)1, puzzles and games;and a catch-all department Maury Levy of dubbed impulse. United Commercial Re- There are interactive zones for children and alty represented Noodle parents,a play area,a computer kiosk for soft- Kidoodle. and Jack Breard and Robert ware demonstrations and Kidoodle'Iheater,a Luleff of UCR represented the landlord for large-screen television with nonstop children's Le the Southlake lease. videos.The store also sponsors such events as The company located at Southlake due visits from authors,entertainers and storytellers. see KIDOODLE on page 18 The store's motto: "Kids learn best when — - they're having fun."That motto spills over into KIDOODLE from page 7 the company's corporate philosophy as well, to the city's rapid growth and its demograph- Betuker said. ics,said Ken Betuker,chief financial officer. "Nothing in our store is violent,and we like "And the Town Square project appealed to sell things that stimulate creativity,"he said. to us.We're excited to be a part of that de- The Lion and Lamb Project, a children's velopment,"he said. advocacy group based in Bethesda,Md.,rec- The Southlake store will employ 20 to 25 " ommends Noodle Kidoodle as a place to find people,and that number will double during the nonviolent toys and products. Christmas season,Betuker added. The project's founder Daphne White battles Noodle Kidoodle targets a mid-to upper- violence in children's programming and toys. income,more educated market. `Parents need to send very clear messages "Texas showed up as one of the promising to their children that violent behavior is unac- markets,"Betuker said.`The Metroplex,Hous- ceptable," White said. "And shopping at ton and Austin appeared as bright blips on our Noodle Kidoodle is one way to keep kids from playing the blood-and-guts video games."* C PAGE 12 THE BUSINESS PRESS WEEK OF MAY 22.1998, - 1 • • •• • Tarrant'�Countys fastest-growing cities .;r .';; Ranked by percentage change in population from Jan.I.1997,to Jan.I,19981 Estimated Jan.I.'97/be.el full-Uwe city Combined sales ta. J...I,'f8 p.prlatleo/ .mpl.yees/area In rate/property tax lamb City,address.Moore,fax.e-mail/web site percentage growth span miles Mayor/city manager per 5100 valuation Sample el city amenities L, ,, ... ..,, ` --4 foealaha' a .w „17 td�.sl•fit' 1 u.• f . Master-planned ed cerrrr...o.bwdsMty neighbor. 1. N7 M.Carroll Atsy fewl'ilaha.jfiNt 1`gt(nr If N.1Nb Rkk s.2S%10.422 hoods,blue-rbben ached*now•domnate/town Iel-sfu,ru 31f-pp ° a',t ny�!� +� Cwtls L Maw!' . .r-1 MI bebshula new error attirty arum.home of '.web sits www.aLN■YIYeasu0''..;•^ .'.Y „ir..ri ..• '. aw v»YR7f�"- ,I,.t- ::as:tRrae Slur QitsNWsu11e1W''•. • - Keller Surrounded by rear axonal facilities and leisure P.O.Ilex 770,Rehr 7{3N 20.900/22,45W7.93% 1 N/19 Ron lad 7.1596/0.47998 activities including lakes,Cory parks.ball Beal***vary, 2• I71.1517,lax 131•Se{7 Lyle Dresher Teas Motor Speedway,hiking and bide%trails web site www.sity.hailer.cem Neeaikid' ,.. r '. '.:. -. • a .• i,• ,: hnrd-wlnung Inks roam 6arK 3. 1305!.Bread St.,Maufald 7{047 yr 7,i i •22.I00n3.400/S.88% �N;`23W40 • Oc Omk Haay/ v a'sislWO.73 sender dtlsn center.ina drama 366ek�,.' 173•p7l,fan 1714414^ *-,.,' ,,{:�.kln•:+.I. e; f}�1L}er • • -.0:r%t'''t I, ea!nfy dub Jog Peal,L ice •'."i .:+ web du wwmmp■eReN•totiaese■s. ., -3W* -r if...,- ., Sailers, - Library.nee perks,tun*and roller bled* 333 W.Mclerey Blvd..P.O.ha 79070.Sailers.76179 Merwo T Nickell/''• 8.2596/0.545 courts.jogging trail,ball Raid.ssenior4. I0,fax 132.1{N IO,SSWI I,OSW4.F1% 7b9.7S Roy L"Pat"Monad citizen canter•youth actactivitiesy.-mall e-mail saginewsnenstar.net *noes 'Ceoiiit wK r a TiooiSmdidctiMplw. _. 5. 201 N.Eater,Edess 74039 "�•""' Ma"Ulu seldll - - •endan.nce emta.r,eeRW tetrll.*IbrRy6• i4150142,90014.1S% ,.404/25 12516/0324 -4t•'. 685-1421k fat NI-N■6 lbw Hat 'LI j ,�. pukka,*. •�..' web cite www.oelese.seie - . ;��.k„r - .. - c. . . ,„_•. tea eilionden al, dames/me d' Cell.ynill. w P.O.Bee HIS.CelleyaiNewton/lle 76034 RkhardNewton/ Qte safe and eeruver.irr pastoral community,9,• 577.7575,Ina 177.7564 17,400/18,100/4.02% 12W12 Bob striving 7.7596/0.3474 new 12.000-square•foot regional commrity ,.mall eu..b®Rash.r.t center,new city park under construction Series..' ...-._ _. Aria"7M•Z•' act` /.,,rY i .A- l . d-I -. •• hidden Creek GoN course,HYlmk Old Town... 141 W.limbo.1.4us ' 4 „• aC : c .Y • k"rn 81aeh! 7.759W0.66iI sewn pelt*Ibnryterder censer. 7• 295-1113,far 447-NBs t rr.,,vi ' {' ' 1 'r" ,.- d H.KIN Gedbyl web site m b,ileae■eR.s F. . 9-.,•e.._s• y ._.-.. .:4 .. a .y+ . r� , . . 1 i e* !Dz85vK.- .voulli new Waal consoles 3'mi•'.e•<y?••. Grand prairie' - r ` Four golf courses,41 fool Lake, 8. 317 College St.,Grand Prairie 75050 109.65WI 11,40W Chiles EnglruN Lone Ran park hone 1a rack (971)237-81{0,lag(972)237428s 2S3% N6/7e C,yy,/,,,,yr' 7.7596/0.67999e racing web site www.cl.grand-pnlrle.ta.es Traders Wine.Palace of Wu Maltose City ...>'t r tp {Tr .,4, ..._... _ - .. Buffalo Ridge Weser park,Dlemard Oake 5024 Broadway As...Matteis Obi 76117 t' Y 'H 47% 2Sgf113 i'+i 2�V Lreord `7.75%/0.46s7s •Coy 'de erode°oa% 9• 212.7700,fa.834-7137 19/sr• 11i E4rs cklun cantor. web site www.cLWtsw4e)*1 �a. .,.t . ' �... - . :r Northman Orchestra. Blue Mound 10. 301 Blue Mound lead.II..M.esd 76131 2.400/2,450/2.0096 IWI Michael 7.7596/0.58 Library.park 232-0661,fax 131.0665 none Arllegt.. r V- :< 7 's^- '.n. . • More than 2,400 aces d prk land 101 W ANam.ANl.gtu 76010 ., • .,, '1fS.BOq/301 ', •Ehl.D.Odom/ . .5%I0.63B main library downtown and lour branch 11. 265•3311,fax 459-6410 3 y";t 1 f99L�' Cwerge carom 1 .jl.s leaden for more thin 6 region - web die www.d.arll.gt...ttue r,?•T'e-,I t••. ryes Di 1. �y vrimrsoats wrrusu*r .. �Y`rICC:�11� aE P`. v,, Grapevine' Historic Main Street.several major festivals per 1 rf P.O.Mx 9f101,Grapevne 7{OSI 35,75W36,45W Wiliam D.Tate/ year.three wineries,adjacent to Lake Grapevine. L•410-3155,fat 410-3011 1.%% S+0/N'b Roger Nelson 7.259W0.405 I5.000-square•fotw library.extensive park system. e-mail thardy®spindlenet excellent xhooh,low crime rate Blchland Nllls _ Llbary,three parks.community center,comb 13.3100 Diana Drive,Richland MI11s 7611e 8]side 50W *S 85/3 9 C.F.K.Nty! 8 2596/DND corn,large residential Iota.welhestablished S9S•4600,fax 595-N44 1.8% Janes W.Quin neighborhoods.close to Fort Worth and Dallas, web site www.ricblaedbllis.com - • ..•.. .,, 1ifg dose to 0/FW international Airport Crowley 7,25017,35W Charles ft.Rutherford,14. ►0.Bet 747,120 N.Hampton Read,Crowley 76036 1.38% 59/7 Jay L Singleton 7.1596/0.698 Three parks,library,good schools 197.2101.fan 297.617e Fen Wersh' . . . 1000 Threchneerto■St.,Fort Worth 76101 4M.20W490,50W. 'Kenneth Barr/ ,Central end aware branch cosmos.two a • w•871•8900,/a.871•6134 "f 7 f a-1' 1.3% 38d 1l,7l2f6.3 Robert Tired e.2596ro.92 roela'm!Ilharle*five golf Carson 19S web site www.d.fort-wertle.a.us - - museums.. Bedford Nine parks.spacious library,gymnasium. 16.1000 F Ridge Deb.,Sedlerd 76021 47,700/48,3aa 301/10 Hurt/Richard D.Hu senior citizen center,historically restored 952.1125.fax 951.2454 1.26% .1 Susan K.Thorpe 8.2596/0.369 schoolhouse and museum offering a wealth of web site www.ci.bedford.tx.rs informational and recreational activities P.O. x O.S 26569,Anbr..k 76126 " - ' • • • .q 5••. . Jerry l•Dunn/ • Full orlon• •• city. .low crane rate. Benbrook Lak*: 17.149.3000,la 249-0884 21.250/21,500/1.19% sill may,C«idin 7,7596/0.785 Tarot Wing at the dty's doonap ebroii..web site www.cl.b. .k. ., ,'.•, ,., . ,y ya ,.. .y 't-„e•• ;,;u'tfi�•. Ade' Shirley Bradley/ Pubic library,three parks,golf course. 18. 613 Seeth Parkway.Axle 76020 9300/9.600/1.05% 93/5 Jim Walker 7.7596/0.617 softball facilities,historical museum. 111.1511,lea 111-7149located on Eagle Mountain Lake North Richland Hill. .-„' . :,i;h f. ... • - ._ NR11,0 Frady Water Park.658 acres of park Ward. 18.7301 M.E.leep 510,North Rlchl.ed Mils76I80 52.60W 0' ko 53.150/I 05% 448/18.29 .e/ 8.2396/0.57 , Iron Hon GOrC•99 se•asrakrnro dloria. S81•5500,fat{S{•75N Larry Cwrdnglom Torras Indoor Speedway over 100 resoesase p ci.■web site www. .rtb-rlcblandbills.mee Keneedale 109 N.New Nape Rood,P.O.Sex 2614 K dale 76060 5 Mark S.W 8.2596/0.6 right/ Progressive,pro-business city that also offers rural Gm.478-5418,fat 483-0710 .00/.35oro.N% b l l4.3 Ted Rowe lifestyles near the heart of the Metroplea web site www.h dal..cew - - t• ` `t21.g700/119..0.0t0.f2% r0p;6/ . d - - Watauga J 21 7101 Read.Watauga 7{IN "'a1°rGarde/a/ .28W07,fax 1BlI99 1.. x -;. . ,. • web site www.e1.w58aup4.e » tsa; . • DaNCIrmln s25h10.69947 1C rma►fedlra tok 11s.Nnowa.i gmerotara !'WOrblh ry ta...Yysrur.f.•sh*,o -h= v.a'•a+..,^ •,...:-.- �,. ..... Hurst 280 park-acres,30 athletic fields. 22ISOS hRoad,iwct Use S. ,Hurst 76054 36,050/36.250/0.5546 289/10.2 - Bill kualer/ s25%/0.566 two aquatic centers,newly remodeled .78e-7000,fax 788-7009 Allan Wuepr library.new tennis center web site rempagesainiremp.net/-hurst NOTES:Wenwerd.VNsge,wish 3.7%grwth,declined a p.redw.pM peed a,pon Gr n de ,wtds 3.3e%erwd� Omdid rampp did net respond by peen d Other oda net awed either d aear en the Sewca Nag cm.,Tit..Caudl es NCTGOC report or pawed no bowmen.growth, Ewknwed accad.5 to•1197 Corrrr Popdanro EwMus•p ldlebed by the Nerd Cris!Taro Ceu ll of Geww.r.e.Apri 199$'-brows a Gospelon aroddo new p.mse Bolds c.le log. Yrenerir eanryerteachwwane papdran woe wed far e•paean of der Re Neaerek.er:WaleL Rowe ONO-Ad not ercra C \pro.? City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Permission to advertise for bids for slurry-seal of streets in Dove Estates, Harbor Oaks, Emerald Estates, Whispering Dell Estates, Highland Estates, Cedar Oaks Estates, Brittany Court, and Raven Bend Additions Background Selected streets are annually scheduled to receive slurry-seal treatment. This is a preventive maintenance measure to streets that are older, yet still in good condition. The slurry-seal will provide additional protection and help to extend the life of the pavement. Last year a seal-coat process called "microsurfacing" was applied to streets L, in Cross Timber Hills, Woodland Heights, and Lake Wood Additions. This year's program, staff is recommending the seal-coat process called slurry-seal. Slurry-seal is less expensive and designed for local street application. A usual maintenance program for asphalt streets is to crack-seal them generally in the first five years, then seal the whole surface, i.e., slurry-seal every five years. The subdivisions proposed to receive the seal coat treatment this fiscal year are listed as follows: 1. Dove Estates 2. Harbor Oaks 3. Emerald Estates* 4. Whispering Dell Estates* 5. Highland Estates* 6. Cedar Oaks Estates 7. Brittany Court 8. Raven Bend *These additions received the Phase II Neighborhood Sewer and have been planned for a new surface to the streets one-year after the sewer installation. (re 5A-1 V The estimated cost of this project is $77,000. Funds are available from the recently approved bond sale. Recommendation Staff recommends Council approve advertisement for bids for slurry-seal of streets within the subdivisions listed above. Please place this item on the June 2, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. J BW/cre Attachment: Location Map L 5A-2 City oou a e Proposed Seal Coat „„„ _ L_....j F I I11iIliE'uth akc �_ ' I ___ Harbor Oaks kll.. , .-..t1._i,.-s.. . .17 .___ Dove Estates slit.: _, 1 ■16 :,::l Emerald ") ivlaodrikg tl"i.1:*:!IE. ••. 04 IIIL Estates Brittany Place- =aI�►.1..; Lt�ol/�-- __. Whispering � � - s:'• Dell Estates Cedar -.km �' L : ;:=: 9 1; � ' Oaks • _ _ .� imiiiikAralvoie -`4,: ; -.■.f.. Highland Estates �11.....: .`,.. �..,�..'•.�■;.:�: F, ..1.psti.____:o _ ei.. ...I",I Estates 1 111 IX Ab4111rilit,„, 7-2 Raven- ♦ -JAI1.6{� �si'ozli `tutt•'•`�.■ I/■u4kl ie1--.I, _ k Bend . 1 -.:.- tia7ii�iza- -rslll__ 1 1 uj .■ U t 1 IIr■m rl m.„,...,,,„ c, el, ii.--w, Iran ■II,1� '-:--i°.v...11n.e.�`,4,r-Y..u�1%•� ■ \�i.--111111►����.u.__�i-ir.=:::1 •/11Intl;CIO- _��_111�11- WI'. _Y.au1111► . L•uGpiiin. == U■\ilmi■\�. i- • n , 11 I■u.■._f -.rn.� JIj •I• ut 1111u11111/I ��... 1 =■.� �='I r I�'Ia_I'i 1 ►.urlly .\ 1 lei 1--t/Pie.■■1■■Ei. � 1 �.� —. -•)mil■- .a•I li/_-i ■ I ITT— '- . I ��"� ��:• r 1 ■. I� �1 IN ►i�.a 'L1r ::-'- ��Il�.11l� ;l T�r,l�•���1'1��■�i'I 1.� , �O\ II.c►�� ■ ,aimag i l:• 1 •oI:1 e ■� .��.� III■.�____� � �� � .�� lliiii IP mr-it„„„:,=.„...,Tolilt•Ilikrigiii 11��I iliiiiiii�1111:: ■ Iligv =1_�■Csgtf si 11aim:ffrilillLum \ ll411� Il1c� 711 llli .ti tuzi_scrajillitr I 1.1..i. -:izif..:*::.,.:. ii,-..I.y:ra -0-m..-ar............... ME Nu mom L •___ :al ■ ��111�1=.�r.,.., .��� .......� � n— ■ ice ■.. i.:_., 11 tea. :�,I-•• - I .. 11111111. ,gyiiim m. ` •r :h .J iaiTYa ..� i'nil� li di nn _ ur�u��■� 1�11�� i".•. .�, o\: �• ��- ��� :r. In.. :1 �_ __'i._r'•:.�1,ii,1::.: 1 MER tagg l k- ?: : ,,., r ;.1 E`..r..dri rif.K "', _Ii ,; "::L�, III " tiC :. ate::(: � :: .- e:.: al.fliVit r Atifittli 11*,;:4f,t•7411 IR git VW:",vat .... litt-wi. _. imittutio 1, w NV "'::11..„:44 )\ra:::$, % 4 41111`.._..‘ lir zriff (1,.„ N 4 xet10.11',V.v.... .0.,f-c0... ..,<....,/,....1 /'� ■ No Scale 5A 3 Public Works-GIS City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Chris Carpenter, Senior Comprehensive Planner SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to submit a letter to TxDOT committing to cover the additional construction costs on Carroll Avenue bridge overpass at S.H. 114 in order to accommodate the recommendations of the Trail System Master Plan As you know, in order to implement the planned combination of on-road and off-road bike trails for the new sections of S.H. 114 as detailed in the Trail System Master Plan, staff has been in contact with TxDOT to establish the design criteria necessary to accomplish this (as well as the associated costs). The following are pertinent issues related to these discussions concerning the design for the Carroll Avenue overpass: 1. TxDOT will agree to provide a 10-foot, two-way bike trail on one side of the road (east side), designed to meet AASHTO standards. (See enclosed preliminary bridge section and typical bike railing) cof 2. This trail increases the width of the planned overpass by approximately 5 feet, adding to the cost of construction above standard costs in the range of approximately $150,000. This figure has been expressed to be the highest possible estimate, and could be lower when detailed plans are drafted. 3. In order to maintain the proper schedule for this overpass construction, Sherry Williams of TxDOT has indicated that she will need a commitment from the City within a week or so as to whether or not the trail needs to be included on the bridge. After that, alterations to the plans run the risk of delaying the final bridge design and,therefore, delaying construction. 4. Staff has also received a commitment from TxDOT that the city's share of funding for the overpass will not be due until after October of 1999,placing this funding item as a FY 1999-2000 expenditure. 5. Staff has been in contact with various representatives from NCTCOG staff concerning possible Federal reimbursement programs. As of this date, President Clinton has yet to sign the transportation funding bill (TEA-21) replacing ISTEA (which expired May 1, 1998), leaving many of the funding mechanisms in limbo until then. After passage, expected this summer, staff would like to pursue a meeting with Michael Morris, NCTCOG director of transportation, to solicit his feedback directly concerning possible new funding sources. Please place this item on the next Council agenda for consideration and authorization. Feel free to contact me at extension 866 should you have any questions. enc: Preliminary Carroll bridge cross-section TxDOT typical bike railing (44: CLC L:\ComDev\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\CORRIDOR\TXDOT\Dir_Mtg.DOC W LAI O p V.L 7 N F- Lr = Ln Z j L LI" Cr rx Q L- O cr U./I— wZ T OD a O 1n rn ry 0O a ' o „ >- O i- 1(X<JmJ N " M =o W o oo n • M o 40� + 6,: Ls) ., Fw- p C., W 4 O 0 F V 0 O O 4 0 F 4 LO " p 1 fil O CZ LLI 4 O 4 0 JW 0,� S M_ /1� O a M la n � w Z j�J U LLI Lal`W0 W 2za Z • J J� 0ITJ 0 CC 4 0 0 0 u a H CC 0 LUP 4 CC 14 O 0 N r V / > mi " =W 4 0 " Q U NI CL =J 1 • .6 Cl 'V vi°°°#V W i>>& cr w U_ _ o <O E 0 L 56-, 03433/98 16:49 TX DOT ENGINEERING BUILDING -4 8174889SM NO.281 906 F g iI. 1 H ,rY;t6gb h:01!a •• s �=� :AI(time 1 e E . - e !i! s ,.-. g F ° � Eh- • ! q gM of1 f•LY Sec LeE x E� V • •t= \ g^ ` h __- ° E88$gs ; f l Aga g al =giY= =g_ u 1 _,I. .i h'ae Ss -a.seil --:- . F e Nhi 1� • ll I '°IM M••1g 1.h_$�ggw� a ;1!ifl!Ih1If�4 ! ' ."2 Wif lizi rr.�=5�5; scy�-aYggli, „,....,,,„...... 0 IYi f n r 1 ,- h- 8-1 .gc 4.. II g G� N __ bw //t 3%. t oo S 8 ;. Fg11, a �° Ssi h i EY ▪ E6 IS :A W: g2 7r-• o ; . ° 4. O": :::i:,:ri:i: 1.y,,-.a Le: $1 2 . 18 i ;,,• _ , J _ • . I MT 4' ¢ S- •r/.t r c iN - 8 if t .X tag '- 9F- �s a u ji - - f u ; h D` N �' O O e a yr • -e 2 4 t il! e b b Ai W a ' 9 a $' eOi o • : r .! ::.:•:-:-' ; g c; :::it--.,,. ..,.. ...., LA ..). !I; g7. . p? ry• .iL' Jfl I.Wain V 1 Fo a fi� a ° S w M° . Pt.ti h -'ssy-h-' °z Cg ° ! ^g 8Vi s hi qo 4E5 £Fsa �I 4I lip w Ie: ;Ott Y W _a c St _tY° ggate £ �L1 :. fib F A £fib ¢Y -`88 n Ihi s P� a lei 0 i • e« m T— °$° o o n — e, R —0 !1 L ' =.e 7 dl • h o r, e :•" MN e • . . . .... i1 4. , 5g-3 • City of Southlake,Texas 411i.e" MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Lee Engineering for the Design of FM 1709 Signal Timings and Capacity Improvements Background The Technical Memorandum on FM 1709 Signal System Evaluation as prepared by Lee Engineering was the basis for the May 7, 1998, Fort Worth District TxDOT Meeting. TxDOT expressed a commitment to work with the city for making improvements along FM 1709. However, they did need more information on the signal timing plan, a striping plan for the third travel lanes, and preliminary plans for the dual left turn at Peytonville Avenue. (kkor The attached professional services agreement with Lee Engineering proposes the following services: 1. Task 1 - Signal Timing Plans They will provide the data necessary for TxDOT to approve a timing plan at the signalized intersections including the proposed signals at Shady Oaks Drive, Town Square, and Commerce Street. 2. Task 2 -Restriping Plan Lee Engineering will assess and identify the intersections for which right turn lanes need to be installed prior to the restriping; assess the need for and develop schematic layouts for a dual left turn at Peytonville Avenue; identify and develop schematic layouts for existing curb radii that are inadequate for turning movements; then prepare a restriping plan for the third lane. 3. Task 3 - Implementation Lee Engineering, TxDOT, and city staff will then implement a "closed loop" (computerized) signal system which will be operated by TxDOT to keep the signals Lt synchronized. 5C-1 MEMORNADUM CURTIS E.HAWK FM 1709 SIGNAL TIMINGS DESIGN MAY 29, 1998 PAGE 2 All three tasks will involve continual communication between city, TxDOT, and Lee Engineering to expedite the tasks as fast as possible. The plans will have to be approved by TxDOT before implementaion will occur. The estimated time frames for the various tasks are: 1. Task 1 - Signal Timing TxDOT will have to approve the plan and then TxDOT will implement a manually timed signal system by mid-June. The only question is if all of the present intersection controllers are capable of being coordinated. If not, TxDOT will need to change the incompatible controllers which will delay the implementaion schedule. 2. Task 2 - Restriping Plan The preliminary plans for dual left turn at Peytonville Avenue, other intersection improvement schematics, and restriping schematic are planned to be presented at the June Retreat. 3. Task 3 - Implementation a) The "closed loop" signal synchronization system will depend on TxDOT and city funding. The city has allotted funds for this under the Capital Improvement Projects Budget. Staff will work with TxDOT for the additional funding. b) The restriping of FM 1709 will depend upon city funds to build the necessary intersection improvements and TxDOT maintenance funds for the actual restriping. The cost of the proposal totals $20,100. Lee Engineering is not certain of the cost of Task 3 that is provided on page 3 of the proposal because of TxDOT's schedule. Should the cost exceed $2,000, Lee Engineering will request approval to continue. Task 3 includes assisting the city and TxDOT with implementation of the plans. Recommendation Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor to enter into professional services agreement with Lee Engineering for the design of FM 1709 signal timing and capacity improvements. Please place this item on the June 2, 1998, Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and ideration /71 BW/ls Attachment: Proposed Agreement 5C-2 5323 SPRING VALLEY ROAD TE SUI 2LLAS3C DA .TEXAS 75240 972.701-9663 FAX 972.701-9669 Lc cncinEERInc May 15, 1998 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: FM 1709 Signal Timings and Capacity Improvements Dear Mr. Whitehead: Lee Engineering is pleased to submit this agreement to perform traffic engineering services for the City of Southlake. The anticipated products of the effort will include signal timing plans for FM 1709, assistance with implementation of signal system hardware components, and a report and illustration documenting the improvements required to add a third through lane to FM 1709. The scope of services outlined below is proposed to complete the study. Scope of Services Task 1 - Signal Timing Plans Lee Engineering will follow the work items below in developing and assisting with the implementation of timing plans at the signalized intersections along FM 1709. 1.1 We will review signal system timing work previously completed for FM 1709. 1.2 We will confirm assumptions used in the previous study and gather additional data as needed. At this time, the additional data will be limited to turning movement counts at the intersection of FM 1709 at Peytonville and FM 1709 at the new Carroll High School driveway east of Peytonville and 24-hour traffic volume counts at two locations on a Saturday. 1.3 We will modify inputs to the signal system timing model as required and develop optimized timing plans for implementation. These timing plans will be for the weekday AM, OFF, and PM peak hours. The 24-hour count data will be used to determine which, if any, of these timing plans should be used during the weekend. These timing plans will be developed using existing count data collected in June of 1997. 1.4 Turning movement counts collected at Peytonville will be used to adjust timing plan �► data for the Peytonville intersection for use during the school year. 5C-3 Mr.Whitehead Page 2 of 4 1.5 We will add proposed signalized intersections at Shady Oaks, Town Center Street B, and Commerce to the coordinated signal system and develop timing data for each. 1.6 We will provide timing data to TxDOT for their review. This data will include cycle lengths, signal phasing, split times, and offsets as well as the times of day during which each timing plan should be run. 1.7 We will modify timing plan data as required and resubmit to TxDOT for implementation. 1.8 To establish a basis to judge the effectiveness of the optimized timing plans, we will conduct travel time runs before new timing plans are implemented during the weekday AM peak(6:30-8:30am), OFF peak (loam-3pm), and PM peak (4:30-6:30pm). We will also conduct travel runs on a Saturday afternoon (1-4pm). 1.9 We will assist TxDOT with implementation and fine tuning of the optimized timing plans. 1.10 We will conduct travel time runs after new timing plans are implemented during the weekday AM peak (6:30-8:30am), OFF peak (10am-3pm), and PM peak (4:30- 6:30pm). We will also conduct travel runs on a Saturday afternoon (1-4pm). The results of the before and after travel time runs will be summarized in a report for your use. �... Task 2 - Restriping Plan for the Existing FM 1709 Shoulder Lee Engineering will follow the work items below in identifying the improvements required to allow the existing shoulder of FM 1709 to be used as a through lane. These improvements may include modifications to existing curb radii, addition of turn lanes, and relocation of existing signal poles and utilities. These improvements may be necessary to ensure the safety of turning vehicles and to allow the third through lane to be fully utilized by through traffic. 2.1 Lee Engineering will obtain a reproducible aerial photo of the FM 1709 corridor at a scale of 1" = 50'. 2.2 Using the turning movement data collected in previous studies, we will identify the signalized intersections at which right turn lanes should be installed prior to restriping the existing shoulder of FM 1709. 2.3 Using the turning movement count data collected at the Peytonville intersection, the need for dual left turn lanes will be assessed. If dual left turn lanes are determined to be appropriate, a schematic layout of the turn lanes will be presented on the aerial photo and a document justifying the need for the turn lanes will be prepared. 2.4 Utilizing the aerial photo, we will identify existing curb radii that are inadequate for turning movements from a through lane. At most locations, 30 feet will be the minimum acceptable radius. LEE EnclflEE Inc 5C-4 Mr. Whitehead Page:of 2.5 We will develop a draft schematic layout for radii and turning lane improvements along FM 1709 between Pearson Lane and SH 114. The draft schematic design will be developed on blueprints of the aerial photos using colored drafting tape and will illustrate turing lane additions and curb radii improvements. 2.6 Feasibility of the proposed improvements will be verified in the field. Utility relocations (including signal poles, utility poles, and storm sewer inlets) required by the proposed improvements will also be identified in the field. 2.7 We will present the draft schematic design with a description of the proposed improvements to the city staff for review and comment. 2.8 We will finalize the description of improvements based on city staff comments. The comments will also be incorporated into a final preliminary schematic design for the restriping of FM 1709 between Pearson Lane and SH 114. 2.9 We will modify inputs to the signal system timing model as based on the recommended changes to lane configurations along FM 1709 and evaluate the optimized timing plans developed in Task 1. Adjustment to the optimized timing plans made possible by the capacity enhancements will be documented for use by TxDOT when the improvements have been completed. Task 3 - FM 1709 Signal System Implementation Lee Engineering will follow the work items below in assisting the City and TxDOT with the implementation of a closed loop signal system for the signalized intersections along FM 1709. This closed loop system will keep the signals synchronized and will allow the City of Southlake and/or TxDOT to monitor the operation of the signals and implement changes as necessary from a remote location. 3.1 We will discuss signal system options including communications, hardware and software with TxDOT. 3.2 We will verify the feasibility of implementing the proposed system and identify the components required to install a closed loop signal system on FM 1709. We will then develop an engineers opinion of probable cost for the system. 3.3 We will assist TxDOT in identifying a contractor to install the closed loop system. 3.4 We will assist with the implementation of the system, including signal timing plans, as required. The three task described above will be treated as individual projects with distinct products. We propose to complete tasks 1 and 2 for lump sum fees of$8,700 and $9,400 respectively. This fee for task 2 includes approximately $2,155 for the custom aerial photography. Black and white prints of the FM 1709 corridor photographs will be available for approximately $75. LEE EncinEEflnc 5C-5 Mr.Whitehead Page4 of4 Because of the uncertainty associated with the level of effort required to complete task 3, we propose to complete this work on an hourly basis at our standard hourly rates included in the attached terms and conditions. We will not exceed $2,000 for task 3 without your prior approval. If you have any questions, please contact me at (972) 701-9663. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this agreement and look forward to working with you on this project. If any or all of this agreement meets with your approval, please sign below and return a copy of this letter to me. Please indicate which tasks we are authorized to proceed with. We have begun work on task 1 of this project as per your verbal notice to proceed. Sincerely, Accepted: t7L7L J T. Short, P.E. Bob Whitehead Date Office Manager Director of Public Works City of Southlake Enclosure: Terms and Conditions LEE EncinEERmc 5C-6 Lee Engineering, Inc. Terms and Conditions March 09, 1998 Additional services as authorized by you will be performed at the following rates: Principal $145.00/per hour Project Manager $110.00/per hour Project Engineer $90.00/per hour Sr. Engineering Designer $80.00/per hour Engineering Designer $68.00/per hour CADD Technician $55.00/per hour Administrative Assistant $55.00/per hour Secretarial $45.00/per hour Highway travel $0.31/mile Meals, lodging, air fares, out-of-pocket costs Reproduction $0.10/copy Aerial Photography Blimp $200/hr. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: 1. Invoices will be submitted monthly. 2. Invoices are due and payable when received. 3. Interest at the rate of 1.5% per month will be applied to invoices not paid within 30 days of initial billing date. 4. We reserve the right to cease work on delinquent accounts. 5. Contracting party is responsible for paying all fees and expenses associated with all activities related to an engagement. Credit will be given for payments received directly from clients of the contracting party or from others. 6. The retainer fee will be credited against fee. 7. In addition to invoices rendered and interest thereon, contracting party agrees to pay any and all legal fees and costs incurred in collecting overdue accounts. 8. Rates are subject to change annually. Work performed in subsequent years will be charged at the adjusted rates. 9. Extra copies of reports will be billed at $10.00 per copy. C:`EUDORA STANDARI.WPD 5C-7 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM `,. May 29, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement for Radio Service Maintenance between the City of Southlake and the City of North Richland Hills. The Southlake Department of Public Safety recommends that the City enter into an interlocal agreement for radio maintenance service. We would join the cities of Richland Hills, Haltom City, Euless, Bedford, the Tarrant County Sheriff's Office, Grapevine, Colleyville, and Keller in forming a group to reduce our radio service maintenance costs. In addition, it will increase our purchasing power in the communications arena and dramatically reduce the cost of replacement batteries in our existing equipment. Our Fort Worth 800 MHz Agreement mandates that we have maintenance with a vendor and this contract will comply with that. These costs are funded, traditionally, from Support Services radio maintenance account number 133.760, of which we have sufficient funds. 66r BC/bls Attachment i 1 i t (6)IC . 5D-1 s t t i STATE OF TEXAS ) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR RADIO SERVICE MAINTENANCE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ) This Agreement, made and entered into by and between the City of Southlake, a municipal corporation, located in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "Southlake," and the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation, located in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "North Richland Hills," evidences the following: WHEREAS, North Richland Hills, and Southlake desire to enter into an Agreement at the request of Southlake for inclusion into a radio maintenance agreement between the City of North Richland Hills and Motorola Communications and Electronics, Incorporated,hereinafter called"Motorola;"and WHEREAS, The Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791 et seq, Texas Government Code, provides authorization for any local government to contract with one or more local governments to perform governmental functions and services under the term of the Act;and WHEREAS, North Richland Hills has negotiated a sole source contract with Motorola and is available to perform the functions described herein; and WHEREAS, Southlake has current revenues available and allocated for this agreement; and WHEREAS, it is mutually advantageous to both parties to enter into the arrangement evidenced by this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, agree as follows; The responsibility of each government entity is outlined below: I. SOUTHLAKE Southlake hereby agrees: 1. To become a part of what is being termed the "North Richland Hills Consortium" which represents a sole source negotiation, by North Richland Hills, for collective radio maintenance covering several governmental agencies throughout Tarrant County. 2. To include all Motorola radio equipment in the maintenance contract which was purchased from Motorola as a part of Southlake joining any 800 Mhz trunked radio system that utilizes the same radio products as those utilized by the Fort Worth 800 Mhz trunked radio system. 3. To ensure optimum efficiency by providing timely repairs to any of its own equipment through direct contact with Motorola. Southlake understands that the benefits derived from joining the "North Richland Hills Consortium" are those seen through bulk discounts based upon total numbers of radios covered under the negotiated contract with Motorola. Page 1 of 4 5D-2 4. That the purchase of radio maintenance shall be made directly from North Richland Hills and that the fees for such coverage shall be only those fees charged by Motorola. All funds that are paid to North Richland Hills will be based on invoicing that will originate from Motorola to North Richland Hills. North Richland Hills will then create invoicing which will be passed along to Southlake and any other governmental agencies who become a part of the "North Richland Hills Consortium." 5. That payment for this service must be prompt since North Richland Hills does not have escrow funds available to cover all governmental agencies that have expressed a desire to participate in the"North Richland Hills Consortium." 6. That this "Agreement" may be cancelled at any time in compliance with Section VI, "TERMS", of this Agreement. Such written notice must originate from the City Manager, Chief of Police or City Purchasing Agent. Upon cancellation of the "Agreement" North Richland Hills will obtain any applicable refunds from Motorola, if such refunds exist, and shall pay the refund amount to Southlake. 7. To provide equipment listings of equipment, owned by Southlake, consisting of Make, Model, Serial Number and any other information deemed necessary for North Richland Hills to properly manage the maintenance agreement process. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS North Richland Hills hereby agrees: 1. To provide Southlake access to a negotiated radio maintenance agreement that provides bulk discounting at a more favorable rate than Southlake could obtain alone. 2. To provide invoicing and notice of fee changes to Southlake as soon as is practicable after having received such fee adjustments from Motorola. 3. To provide any information dealing with the radio maintenance agreement available to Southlake upon request. 4. To act as the central receiving point for all Motorola originated invoices or refunds and to assure that payment is made to Motorola as quickly as possible after having received payment from members of the "North Richland Hills Consortium." North Richland Hills will also pass refunds back to any agency on whose behalf the refund was made. 5. To gather information from the members of the "North Richland Hills Consortium" which is needed by Motorola so as to enter into a proper radio maintenance agreement. Motorola has indicated that they will create addenda to the original contract which will have the equipment of each member agency contained within them. There will be an addendum for each agency with a listing of the equipment covered. II. AUTHORIZATION North Richland Hills authorizes Southlake to deal directly with Motorola regarding all issues except payment of invoiced fees or refunds. Southlake authorizes North Richland Hills to negotiate on its behalf Page 2 of 4 SD-3 with the understanding that North Richland Hills shall act in the best interest of the group as a whole rather than any agency as an individual. Southlake shall be kept abreast of all attempts to negotiate future fees and will be made a part of such negotiations by their representatives attending meetings held for the purpose of fee negotiations. III. CONTROL It is understood by both parties that the intent of this agreement is to achieve the lowest cost possible for radio maintenance and that this is being accomplished through several governmental agencies pooling their radio equipment into a larger aggregate,thus providing the ability to obtain better bulk discount rates. W. OPERATION WARRANTY North Richland Hills makes no representations or warranties regarding the normal management of the radio maintenance agreement process other than outlined below: In the event of problems arising between Southlake and Motorola, North Richland Hills shall not be held responsible for anything other than the handling of invoicing and payments as outlined in this Agreement. The contents of invoicing will have an origination point of Motorola and will not be raised or lowered by North Richland Hills unless an invoicing error is encountered. If such an error is found, Southlake will be immediately notifed of the reason for the raising or lowering of the invoice. V. CLAIMS To the extent allowed by law, each jurisdiction does hereby waive all claims against and agrees to release every other City or County, its police department, Sheriff's Department, officials, agents, officers and employees in both their public and private capacities, from and against any and all claims, suits, demands, losses, damages, causes of action and liability of every kind, including but not limited to court costs and attorney's fees which may arise due to any death or injury to any person, or the loss of, damage to, or loss of use of any property arising out of or occurring as a consequence of the performance of this agreement whether such injuries, death or damages are caused by the sole negligence or the joint negligence of any jurisdiction, its officials, agents, officers and employees. It is the express intention of the parties hereto that the waiver and release provided for in this paragraph includes claims arising out of such other City's or County's own negligence, whether that negligence is a sole or a concurring cause of the injury, death or damage. It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of this Agreement, no jurisdiction waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions. VI. TERMS The initial term of this Agreement shall be one (1) year, and shall automatically renew itself on a yearly basis thereafter unless either party decides to terminate, or both parties mutually agree to change or modify the conditions of this Agreement. Any change in the approved yearly fee, including increase of anticipated Page 3 of 4 5D-4 expenses, cost of equipment, software development, or maintenance enhancements shall be fully documented. Southlake will be advised by February 1st of each year of proposed fee increases in order to provide for adequate considerations in their budget development process. Southlake's portion of any radio maintenance costs will be prorated, based on the number of radios or other related equipment covered under the maintenance contract at the time of the fee increase. Fee increases will not take effect until October 1st of any year which give the parties eight (8) months from the February 1st notice requirements in order to plan for the increase. Additional equipment may be added at any time and a prorated charge will be figured for each additional unit of equipment added. If either party decides to terminate this Agreement, after the initial term, written notice, to the following respective addresses, must be received by the other party not later than ninety (90) days before the renewal date. The fee herein set out shall be payable on or before October 31 st of each year, except for the first year, which shall be prorated and payable within thirty (30) days of Southlake' beginning coverage date as listed in the maintenance contract with North Richland Hills and Motorola. City Manager City Manager City of North Richland Hills City of Southlake P. O. Box 820609 667 North Carroll North Richland Hills,Texas 76182-0609 Southlake,Texas 76092 (Execution of Contract shall be construed as the latest City Council Approval Date listed below) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE City Manager City Manager ATTEST:: ATTEST:: City Secretary City Secretary This agreement was executed by North Richland Hills on the 27th day of June,1994. (City Council Resolution Number 94-28) This agreement was executed by Southlake on the day of (City Council Resolution Number )(if applicable) Page 4 of 4 5D-5 City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 98-50 Cr" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, SUPPORTING THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE'S SUBMITTAL OF A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL AND FUNDING FOR THE WIDENING OF THE EXISTING STATE HIGHWAY 121 BRIDGE AT BASS PRO DRIVE (FORMERLY BETHEL ROAD) IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Grapevine is widening the existing two-lane Bass Pro Drive (formerly Bethel Road) to a four-lane divided roadway from State Highway 26 east to the City Limit of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas (for a total length of 3,450 feet) which includes 1,135 feet for the bridge section and approaches; and WHEREAS, the existing State Highway 121/Bass Pro Drive bridge is a two-lane bridge structure approximately 400 feet in length; and WHEREAS, the total cost for the improvements is $4,777,660 which includes right of way; roadway, approach, and bridge design and construction; traffic signal installation engineering services, testing, and inspections; and pavement striping, markings, utility relocation, drainage, and landscaping; and WHEREAS, the improvements to Bass Pro Drive will offer local and regional mobility benefits by providing both direct and alternative access to the recreational area of Grapevine Lake, the Historic Main Street Area in Grapevine, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport via International Parkway, Farm-to-Market Road 2499 into Denton County and the cities of Flower Mound and Highland Village, the densely developed office/warehouse and distribution centers within the City of Coppell, and the Grapevine Mills Mall Area; and WHEREAS, the proposed State Highway 121 bridge improvement project in combination with the City of Grapevine's Bass Pro Drive widening project, will complete the last link in the development of a direct parallel alternative route to the heavily congested State Highway 114/State Highway 121 Corridor adjacent to Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport which provides direct access not only to State Highway 121 and State Highway 114, but also State Highway 360, Interstate Highway 635, Farm-to-Market Road 2499, State Highway 26 and International Parkway serving Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; and a Sr" City of Southlake,Texas Resolution No. 98-50 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the State Highway 114, State Highway 121, State Highway 635, State Highway 26, and Farm-to-Market Road 2499 corridors are attracting increased development activity within all adjacent communities; and WHEREAS, adequate roadway systems are critical to all area counties, municipalities, and businesses in order to accommodate traffic demand and to provide safe, efficient, and environmentally sensitive transportation systems; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Southlake hereby supports the City of Grapevine's request to the Texas Transportation Commission for consideration of/and approval for funding of the widening of State Highway 121/Bass Pro Drive bridge section at an estimated cost of $2,164,900, provided all Federal and State requirements are adhered to and actual construction can commence within the FY 98-99. SECTION 2. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand • City Secretary 5F City of Southlake,Texas Resolution No. 98-50 Page 3 of 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: D:IW D•FLLFSIRESOLUTT9b5QD0Gkb (117 i"2-3 May-2O-98 02:09P P.05 Bethel Road/Bass Pro Drive Bridge •Lii., Grapevine, Texas / \ `., Dalton&gr../ —r--i 1 yj y r F. -, ------ Arlogr_ Gibson Rd W Sandy lake Rd icH/ • ` 15- Jiry i.-7.y. i• 1 '. i'L= l � v�.zti ' �_ ' I (Rakth ,'4 , x, i r : '' la . '' Ii r • ? rT \ I p ) T,? . . -' it Prdllcthcl Br' -` '� v } I 7�_ d Lise IX f \ /15 1f. li_ / �. 1 Uy Bethel Rd u�l 1 CC > ` ar j �!\ i J 1. c as /./ (. zt V � . i iIt• -, „ ._ t‘.-7A<\° stie /46 Coppcli Rd 1 i cottonwood si l EQSY 5�± aIIas ,1 ` l Statesman Dr:'\ !l Rd ) c; ,' E�tlh SI E U, •Vi star 'Bl vd.. J' G7 1 / c I / i O rT,l 0.5 1 Streets98 copy.„,c ¶OS -,D17.M.crosoll Gorporsual'nano its supcho s.Au,,oils,ese,red. Plea rul ar verb 74rt H Mir,// opslspt•1 cam. Y•rje, ittisme sue--171 . May-20-98 02:08P P_O2 I VINE. May 13, 1998 The Honorable Rick Stacy Mayor of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Resolution of Support for an Interchange at Bass Pro Drive and SH 121 Dear Mayor Stacy: The City of Grapevine is going before the Texas Transportation Commission to request assistance in the development of an interchange at Bass Pro Drive and (libr SH 121. This interchange will provide regional mobility and relieve congestion to the SH 114/SH 121 funnel by providing an alternate route. The City of Grapevine will be presenting their request to the commission on June 25, 1998. Attached is a copy of the resolution that the City of Grapevine is requesting your entity to consider passing. Your timely response to this matter would be appreciated. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Bob Price, or myself, at 817-410- 3135. Sincerer_ L7Z) 1 . z Roger Nelson City Manager O'laudreyyerrylvanderpr (re" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THE CITY OP CKAPKV IIvE P.O.Box 95104•Grapevine.Texas 76099•Phone Mctm 817/410-3135•Fax 817/41(1-3(1)3 City of Southiake,Texas Lir MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Janitorial Services City Council awarded the bid for janitorial services to Kenniko Janitorial Maintenance and Supply Company on October 31, 1997. During the course of the following several months, Kenniko experienced problems meeting the terms of the contract and performing the work to the city's satisfaction. Following several meetings with staff, Kenniko submitted a letter notifying the city of its intent to terminate the agreement. Staff contacted the second lowest bidder and asked if they would be willing to hold their bid price and accept the contract. They were unwilling to do so. As such, staff sought bids once again for janitorial services. Bids were received from two vendors. The low bid of$24,129.84 ($2,010.82/month) was received from James Enterprise. As expected, this bid is higher than the annual charge of$18,660 ($1,555/month) awarded to Kenniko last October. This cost difference can primarily be attributed to the addition of the 3,500 square foot Senior Activity Center to the contract. Note that Kenniko stated in their letter that they believe they underbid the project. Staff has checked references for James Enterprise. The City of Grand Prairie was very positive about the company, stating that they were easy to work with, accessible, and provided excellent service. Other reference comments were consistent. No problems were identified through the reference checks. The janitorial contract is for all City facilities, and specifies an initial one year contract period with the City's option, on an annual basis, to continue the contract for up to two additional years. Staff recommends awarding the janitorial services contract to James Enterprise for one year, beginning June 3, 1998. Please place this item on the Council agenda for consideration. i S 5G-f fr H E To 3 CO 1 Q O c Ts CV O o C8CCD (I)• E " ° V Q M M O C6 '5 3 c o co w CO CCe N Q 7 p c zov v 0M � mQcOCV ci a) To -0 c o c J < CA V CO c �, 0 O O v O m Q M In c 3 E O Q U x c 0 tO c ocOM co - 2 � c •- c U < CDao c O CV U C 2 Q 0 U N U 2 a) c Co a) rn a) N coo � 1 ' CIS 2 5 o Cl,' a) co V •C CLU U 'm mmm co � T- CV 56 a r LT111N'S CLEANING, LLC LKENNt JANITORIAL 6513-B Smithfield Rd. • Fort Worth,TX 76180 • Office: (817)428-1453 • (817)428-2410 • Fax:(817)428-7003 City of Southlake Administration Department 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Tx 76092 Attn: Crystal James Dear Crystal, Pursuant to our telephone conversation on April 14, 1998, this letter is to inform you that as of May 31, 1998, Kenniko Janitorial Maintenance and Supply will no longer be able to provide service to you. Over the course of the last few months we have sent in many different crews to do the cleaning there. We have sincerely tried our best to provide you with the type of service that the city wanted. I have appreciated your honesty and your help in each situation. At this time I feel that the contract was underbid to be conducive to the actual needs of the city, and the time that is required to do the work. To continue trying to provide the service that you require would not be cost effective to me. Once again, I thank you for personally taking the time to work with us and I wish you the very best for the further. Sincerely, k Ly6 Ballester President L �� �-3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM ,�• May 29, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-47, In support of making application for Federal Emergency Management Grant funding. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducts an annual grant program for emergency management projects. The grant program permits reimbursement for up to 50% of the costs directly related to emergency management, including salaries, equipment, and supplies. A resolution of support for the application of funds from FEMA is attached for the review and consideration by the City Council. This reimbursement would consist of up to 50% of Deputy Director Garland Wilson's salary, along with 5% of the Administrative Coordinator's salary, and 100%of our part time emergency management employee. All of these monies would be reimbursed to existing budgeted positions. It could allow us to elevate our part time emergency management position to full time status if we receive 100% of that salary. The Federal Government is placing a great deal of emphasis on emergency management and the grant is an ongoing year to year grant, once we are awarded the initial grant. This is part of our emergency management plan that all department heads have been working diligently on in an area that we all recognize as a concern. Application of the funds does not bind the city to any expenditure outside of those already existing in the budget. Nor would we create an additional expenditure of funds by receiving the grant award. However, we could receive a partial reimbursement of expenses through the grant. 66 BC/bls Attachment L SH-1 RESOLUTION NO. 98-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, IN SUPPORT OF THE 1998-99 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT GRANT FUNDING PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake concurs with the efforts of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's project to enhance emergency preparedness, and WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has established a program designed to assist agencies in those efforts by making funding available to support worthwhile programs for improving emergency preparedness, and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake is a small, but rapidly growing community with a desire to provide adequate emergency preparedness and the need for fiscal assistance during the incipient phase of community development, and WHEREAS, the objectives of the program are designed to promote emergency preparedness, and WHEREAS, the City of Southlake agrees to conform to all of the requirements of the grant funding program upon being awarded such financial assistance, (re NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,by the City of Southlake, that the City Council of Southlake, Texas supports the Federal Emergency Management Agency Grant Funding Program, and authorizes the Southlake Department of Public Safety to apply for grant funding to further support the emergency preparedness of the city. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF , 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary Cie SH-2 City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM Lope, May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Change Order No. 3 to the contract with Saber Development Corporation for the installation of sanitary sewer in Huntwick Estates Addition Background Huntwick Estates was selected to receive sanitary sewer improvements as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. The subdivision was originally constructed in 1984 with a"dry" sanitary sewer system. However, the house service lines were never plugged and one sewer main has been damaged, therefore, part of this project is to rehabilitate the sewer main and plug the unusable service lines. The project also includes the elimination of a sewer lift station located at Carroll Middle School, which had several maintenance problems. (low During the construction phase, existing lines were inspected using a camera and additional areas of the sewer line were discovered to be holding water. The proposed change order is to rehabilitate those additional areas. Most of the lines have been rehabilitated, but, as part of this proposed change order, two sections of the existing sewer line will be replaced. Change Order No. 3 is in the amount of $22,582.50. Change Order no. 1, for modifications at the Pearson ground storage tank, was in the amount of $27,500 and Change Order No. 2, to correct a water line conflict, was in the amount of$6,800. The cumulative amount of all the change orders totals $56,882.50, for a total contract price of $277,023. The CIP budget provides $200,000 for this project. Recommendation Staff recommends Council approve Change Order No. 3 to the contract with Saber Development Corporation for the installation of sanitary sewer in Huntwick Estates Addition. Please place this item on the June 2, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. B W/cre (lbw. Attachment: Change Order No. 3 Site Map 5I-1 CHANGE ORDER No. 3 Dated: May 29, 1998 Project Neighborhood Sewer Program Phase II — Abandonment of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station at N. Carroll& E. Dove St. and Huntwick Estates OWNER City of Southlake Contract For Sanitary Sewer Improvements Contract Date December 18, 1998 To: Saber Development Corporation Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract: City of Southlake Owner By Dated , 1998 L Nature of Changes: Remove Following Items From Contract: 1) Construct 4" cored connection to manhole for 5 EA @ $150.00 = $750.00 4" service line 2) Install 4" PVC service pipe by boring 250 L.F. @ $ 25.00 = $6,250.00 3) Standard 4" sewer service connection 3 EA. @ $ 100.00 = $300.00 4) Pavement replacement for 4" service installation 190 L.F. @ $8.00 = $1,520.00 5) Remove and replace existing sanitary sewer line 400 L.F. @ $15.00 = $6,000.00 To eliminate sags in the line 6) Point#4—Repair split of pipe approximately 10 1 EA. @ $1,800.00 = $1,800.00 (400, Feet west of manhole #5 Total = $ 16,620.00 5I-2 Additional Work to be Constructe d: 1) Point repair#6—repair sag north of manhole #3, 1 EA. @ $2,000.00 = $2,000.00 station 0-20'; including asphalt repair, excavation, and materials 2) Point repair#7—repair sag north of manhole #3, 1 EA. @ $1,700.00 = $1,700.00 Station 120'-140'; including necessary excavation and materials 3) Point repair#8—repair sag south of manhole #4, 1 EA. @ $1,700.00 = $1,700.00 station 44'-62'; including necessary excavation and materials 4) Point repair#9—repair sag south of manhole#4, 1 EA. @ $1,700.00 = $1,700.00 station 75'-97'; including necessary excavation and materials 5) Point repair#10—repair sag south of manhole #4, 1 EA. @ $1,700.00 = $1,700.00 station 148'-164'; including necessary excavation Lore and materials 6) Point repair#11 —repair sag south of manhole #4, 1 EA. @ $1,700.00 = $1,700.00 station 240'- 250'; including necessary excavation and materials 7) Point repair#12 —repair sag east of manhole #6, 1 EA. @ $1,700.00 = $1,700.00 station 90'- 110'; including necessary excavation and materials 8) Point repair#13 —repair sag east of manhole #6, 1 EA. @ $2,400.00 = $2,400.00 station 146'- 190'; including necessary excavation and materials 9) Furnish and install 8" sanitary sewer pipe (Spec. SDR-35) 200 L.F. @ $26.00 = $5,200.00 In 0'-6' trench depth; complete installation, including necessary trenching, embedment, placement & backfill 10) Furnish and install 8" sanitary sewer pipe (Spec. SDR-35) 200 L.F. @ $29.00 = $5,800.00 In 8'- 10' trench depth; complete installation, including (kr- necessary trenching, embedment, placement& backfill 5I-3 11) Furnish and install sod (type to be specified by property 445 S.Y. @ $4.50 = $2,002.50 owner) 12) Remove & replace existing 6' wood fence 20 L.F. @ $15.00 = $300.00 13) Trench safety in accordance with OSHA requirements 400 L.F. @$0.50 = $200.00 14) Television inspection of 4" service laterals as well as 1 L.S. @ $4,050 = $4,050.00 television inspection of main lines upon completion of sanitary sewer improvements and 15) Repair concrete approach on Lot #12 for service repair 1 EA. @ $250.00 = $250.00 16) Locating & exploration of Point Repair#4 1 EA. @ $1,000 = $1,000.00 17) Furnish & install ultra-sonic liquid level sensor, typical 1 LS @ $5,800 = $4,900.00 of Multronics Multi-Range Plus complete in place Total Additional Work= $ 38,302.50 Total Net Change Order Amount= $21,682.50 L These Changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time: Contract Price Prior to This Change Order $ 254,440.50 Net Increase Resulting from This Change Order $ 21,682.50 Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ $276,123.00 NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B(1978 Edition) Contract Time Prior to This Change 90 calendar days Net Resulting from This Change Order 40 Current Contract Time Including This Change Order 130 calendar days The Above Changes Are Approved: Robert R. Whitehead, P.E. (law Director of Public Works By 51-4 Date , 1998 The Above Changes Are Accepted: Saber Development Corporation Contractor By Date , 1998 L L 5I-5 ProposedpSewer Im rovements for Huntwick Estates , ._ •4 . . . . - =Et t. 4-e to„ ,;4, 1 sigg, .-TE-.. Jrtt �� 5 mai. Fil l-f-r 1 c i Ft Station WII . CARROLL �,�o E iL. k r MIDDLEEME . �E� SCHOOLAbandon t1i _ 7 wow pi ••.....•....•.. •.O....N•• EMEVtli EST ATE SOUTH 1I, ,,„ . y.: r. o\\11 Legend N Proposed Sewer Line = _ W �,� E f) rhig •••••••••• Existing Sewer Line s No Scale 51-6 Public Works-GIS City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM Limpi May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Change Order No. 4 to the contract with Mid-State Utilities for the installation of sanitary sewer in Mission Hills Addition Background During the installation of sanitary sewer in Mission Hills Addition, the contractor discovered the original force main was not built to plan. This impedes the installation of a manhole to service the gravity line in two locations currently being placed within the subdivision. This change order will allow the contractor to build a "cast-in-place" concrete manhole around the force main and gravity line, thus completing the new gravity sewer connection. The force main can not be disturbed or service to other residences in the area will be jeopardized. LThe Mission Hills sewer project was bid for the amount of $367,614.20, with the CIP budget providing $368,000. Change Order No. 1, for boring in Diamond Circle Estates, was approved in the amount of $36,167.54 and Change Order No. 2, for boring backyards in Mission Hills, was approved in the amount of$16,732.50. Change Order No. 3 was a deduct in the amount of-$5,739.24, the contractor was able to bore rather than trenching so as not to disturb the existing pavement. The proposed Change Order No. 4 is in the amount of $9,780, which makes the cumulative amount of all change orders $56,940.80. The cumulative amount of all change orders is approximately 15% of the original cost of the project, which is under the allowable 25%. Recommendation Staff recommends Council approve Change Order No. 4 to the contract with Mid-State Utilities for the installation of two manhole junction boxes in Mission Hills Addition sanitary sewer project. Please place this item on the June 2, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/cre Attachment: Change Order Request No. 4 /14400- Site Map 5J-1 I -STATE UTILITSSi P.O. BOX 1160 • WACO,TEXAS 76703 MAY 27,1998 CITY OF SOUTHLAXE 667 NORTH CARROLL AVE. SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS 76092 RE: MISSION HILL ESTATES PROJECT CHANGE ORDER REQUEST NUMBER 4 ATTENTION: SHAWN POE, CAPITOL PROJECTS COORDINATOR WE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FOR CHANGE ORDER NUMBER FOUR: (1kmir' DELETE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 1 EACH MANHOLE ON LINE B-2 STA #0+00 AT 1,960.00 EACH. 1 EACH MANHOLE ON LINE B-4 STA #0+00 AT 1,960.00 EACH. TOTAL AMOUNT OF DEDUCTION I5 $3,920.00. ADD ON WORK TO REPLACE ABOVE ITEMS DEDUCTED: 1 EACH INSTALL 4' X 4' MANHOLE JUNCTION BOX ON LINE B-2 AT STA 0+00 AT 6,8500.00 EACH, 1 EACH INSTALL 4' X 4' MANHOLE JUNCTION BOX ON LINE B-4 AT STA 0+00 AT 6,8500.00 EACH. TOTAL ADDTIONAL WORK IS $13,700.00. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF,THIS CHANGE ORDER IS FOR $9,780.00 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL ME AT 817-999-1499 OR 254-863-5644. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, JIM ESTEP-SUPERINTENDENT CC: FAXED -817-421.5782 ORIGINAL BY MAIL 5J-2 T0 'd bb9Q 299 bc7_ aiw WFi 5b: 90 a3M as-LZ-Akiw City of S Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements For Mission Hill Estates / „, 4 - M46�SS\O E...-, Nits , -DES *** o �D 4 N 11-DERivp CS °It > . , 4 —M tIVA , i�a Legend w ► 1 ak Approved Sewer Improvements 5)-3 No Scale Public Works - GIS City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-027 PROJECT: Resolution No. 98-48 Specific Use Permit-Explorer Pipeline STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for Explorer Pipeline on property legally described as being Tract 1 B 1 A situated in the Harrison Decker Survey,Abstract No.438, Tracts 4B and 4C, situated in the C.B. McDonald Survey, Abstract No. 1013, and Tract 1 B situated in the Payton R. Splane Survey, Abstract No. 1453, and being approximately 16.48 acres. A Site Plan for Explorer Pipeline's Southlake Meter Station and Terminal will be considered with this request. LOCATION: South side of East Continental Boulevard at the intersection of East Continental Boulevard and South Kimball Avenue. OWNERAPPLICANT: Explorer Pipeline Company CURRENT ZONING: "I-2" Heavy Industrial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial NO. NOTICES SENT: Eighteen (18) RESPONSES: Five (5) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • W.B. Strange III(Tr E-Systems, Inc.), P.O. Box 660248, Dallas, Texas, in favor of. (Received 4/13/98) • G. Mikal Darden, (Metroplex Accoustical Inc.), 2050 East Continental Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Decreased property values and offensive smell." (Received 4/21/98) • G. Mikal Darden, (J.K. Development Inc.), 2050 East Continental Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Decreased property values and offensive smell." (Received 4/21/98) • Johnny L. and Edna E. Beech, 2050 Crooked Lane, Southlake, Texas, opposed. See attached letter. (Received 4/21/98) • Margaret Long, 1219 Timberline Court, Southlake, Texas, undecided. (Received 4/30/98) P&Z ACTION: April 23, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. (kr' 1, dated April 17, 1998,deferring Item#2 (screening)to a future Site Plan, deleting Items#5 (sidewalks) and#7 (bufferyards), and modifying Item#6 to require one (1)parking space. r1A- 1 City of Southlake,Texas COUNCIL ACTION: May 5, 1998; Approved(7-0)on consent to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the June 2, 1998, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated April 17, 1998, with the exception of those listed in Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 29, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-027SU.WPD L rlA - � City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: City Council FROM: Art Wright, Community Development Assistant SUBJECT: Opposition Letters On April 21, 1998, I received three responses from property owners Johnny and Edna Beech, JK Development Inc., and Metroplex Accoustical, Inc., in opposition to case number ZA98-027, Specific Use Permit for Explorer Pipeline. The responses referred to concerns of odors and reduced property values caused by additional fuel tanks. Case number ZA98-027, Specific Use Permit for Explorer Pipeline, is a request for the placement of a 168 square foot fuel sampling facility at the Explorer Pipeline Meter Station located on State Highway 26. After explaining the purpose of the site plan to the property owners by phone, the property owners indicated that they would not oppose the placement of the sample facility along State Highway 26. On April 21, 1998, I sent new noticification letters to these property owners, marking the proposed building location, to allow them to make changes to their original responses. L CAOFFICE\W P W IN\•WPDOCS\98-027LT.W PD 7/ 3 j I I r , PO __ .,a • , , , , , , / t 1 : , , \ 40./.A0 _ .r—'L ,:_j_.,, ,iiiiii, . , , ' Alur i I IIW ---,_ ' _, =t-laiiii ,,,..11 _d _w, :,1 i i -Frri- 1 Th piny inskitm`�, -------1r--' , ,,,/ pg3KI ____;' 1„:::, . Fir-i Algal g 1118)110 tiit' wow. iim—',... •ir.,,,.i.ausin ., .....„. w ....“.21i_____".... qvill ---1-ograim #04 , ' .♦ iiiiiimow iiif ter.. wit. „Ai. , ii,„Lia iiimi imaillttal,,, tea' ! / 13 1 a P4,' Abe in-: Fil ..:4 1 '- .. i ITO im a.: . 0 1 V ' II 4:4, Millik vA /0- )7- 7 No \ � , ,. .-. I Y 3 <q TRACT MAP G\12. e�\1Z cam ,�� _,� • P . iklieWn TR 6E ^,�/•°L4R , CO 1 6C TR 60 4.57 AC /� O R✓ a v 12.678 0 . AC 3 AC 0 Le . ,, 1 — _. TRACT 4 "�I RI 1-1" C— ,35•1Ac X 7 D 0 TR 6F ` D m 9 > TR E-SYSTEMS INC.I 4.07AC n m p 03 3 0 -I 13 C C A 3 9 J.BEECH CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 4 =6 z z ---) w )4K3 TR 18100 • / "� B�- .67 AC D.STOWS AC 4 —1" TR 1810E 84K1 .45 AC •I-1• TRACT 3 AC �— TR 1810E TR 1t310A ...JO 4K2A .45 AC S.HUGHES 6c1 PARADIGM PROPERTIES O TR 1810G 1' 1B10C_it T 1A MANAGEMENT INC. 4K2 .45 AC S.HUGHES �' 15.6 A O TR 1812 re TR 1815 i6 14K28 .45 AC C.YOUNG u. ^+ O TR 5 8AC TR 1814 e 1 84c C.YOUNG x AC TR 1850 TR 18 IR , 34H .45 MH'J.HALL "' // AC H D.TR 1817 18 34L5 TR 185 v GOLLIHUGf-6" AC 1.5 0 W TR 1618 ..18 34L4 M.LONG u AC W M. TR 1813 .. Lie"3 TR 1B11A WILLOUGBY " Fi INA ' TR .45 AC E+ TR 1816 ._.16 .4 AC IG 1 ; ��� s TR l AC TR 1138 a CONOCO,INC. .0. .4 AC ee I. FINA OIL 8 CHEMICAL CO. 34L6A r-- TR 181 /f TR 1A9A TR 188A TR O .45 AC .4 AC ....601 16.654 AC 1 3416 TR 1898 14.356 0 4 " C .45 AC TR 188C 18 .4 AC '6e.1 1a 344CL1 TR 1©9.45 ACTR IBM ...18 ,� 4 AC eel I 34L7 TR 1D9C - ,/I1 ® .45 AC TR 187B1 ,TR,. n. TR 187C .4 AC M14 11 oef 9n 1 X "1-2" 84L .45 AC TR 1878 18 iR 1eu1 TR 181C 1eu2i ?1 n i 0 .4 AC ,114 w1 24e22 e t .4ex2 0- ' I Z 2 TR 1 B7A \ 111 1.0316 0 — 84A .43 AC 1 TR 1B7 /i" AC / .38 AC SBA , ,, 113 ^I_2" '� TR 4C +,, 1 .46 AC r7' 1 4 •• 6 ‘P ` @@@JJJ PETROLEUM COMPANY OF TEXAS 1 -1\ ER TR 1818 i, G�A4 • 51 E�CvK Y 15 AC y�\�\,��j , A'4 U C> O� PP LTR 183 /,G/ o N 30 AC ANl! ,/ MSS- IMOADJACENT OWNERS 5n N AND ZONING r, -5 04-21-98 L Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 Reference No.: ZA 98-027 To Whom It May Concern: We received our notice for a Specific Use Permit for Explorer Pipeline for property located on the south side of East Continental Boulevard at the intersection of East Continental Boulevard and South Kimball Avenue. Since there is no such address as East Continental Boulevard at the intersection of East Continental Boulevard and South Kimball Avenue, we called P&Z to determine where this would be. On 04-21-98, we talked to Art Wright and found out that the location is actually on the south side of East Continental Boulevard at the intersection of East Continental and Crooked Lane (not South Kimball Avenue). He explained that the Explorer Pipeline Company was requesting the change in order to add more fuel storage tanks. (how, We are unable to attend the meeting to be held by the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission on 04-23-98. However, we would like to go on record as stating that we- are opposed to this zoning change or Specific Use Permit for Explorer Pipeline. We realize there are already fuel storage tanks south of this location but we do have a buffer zone between the existing tanks and our property. When'the wind is out of the south, we do get a odor from these tanks and having more tanks, even closer, would escalate this problem. We feel the additional fuel storage tanks would definitely lower all the property values in the areas close to the property. Please note the attached copy of the "CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, ORDINANCE NO. 679" which states in Section 2 that S. Kimball Ave., west of Crooked Lane Blvd. and north of E. Continental Blvd. as described in Exhibit "A", are hereby changed to"Crooked Lane" effective 07-04-97. Very truly yours, Johnny L. & Edna Beech 2050 Crooked Lane Southlake, TX 76092-9012 817/488-8151 Johnny L. Beech (km. -:e"1/-7-1_ , L- 2C-s , ///') Edna E. Beech Enclosures (4) 'IA " ,____ RtfroppR., 2 1,9§#8 1 of CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • ORDINANCE NO. 679 LAN ORDLNANCE CHANGING THE NAMES OF PORTIONS OF STREETS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "CROOKED LANE BLVD" EAST OF SOUTH KIMBALL AVENUE AND SOUTH OF EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD, AND AS "SOUTH KINIBALL AVENUE" WEST OF CROOKED LANE BLVD. . .ND NORTH OF EAST CONTINENTAL AVENUE TO "CROOKED LANE ", FURTHER DESCRIBED N EXHIBIT "A"; AND THE STREET PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "EAST CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD", LOCATED IN THE HERITAGE INDUSTRIAL PARK, TO "SOUTH KIMBALL AVENUE", FURTHER DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES. VtiREAS. a change in the name of the street located within the City of Southlake, Texas (the L "City'). presently known as -South Kimball Avenue-. located West of Crooked Lane Blvd. and North of E. Continental Blvd.. to "Crooked Lane Blvd." has been requested by the City of Southlake: and WHEREAS. a change in the name of the street located within the City presently known as "E. Continental Blvd.". located in the area known as Heritage Industrial Park, to "S. Kimball Ave." has been requested by the City of Southlake: and WHEREAS. it is the intention of the City Council to hereby officially change the name of such streets as requested. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the name of the portion of the street located within the City presently known as Crooked Lane Boulevard. east of South Kimball Avenue and south of East Southlake Boulevard. and the name of the portion of the street presently known as "S. Kimball Ave." west of Crooked Lane Blvd. and north of E. Continental Blvd. as described in Exhibit "A are hereby officially changed to "Crooked Lane ". Section 3. That the name of the portion of the street located with the City presently known as "E. Continental Blvd."" in the Heritage Industrial Park as described in Exhibit "A". is hereby officially changed to "S. Kimball Avenue". Section 4. If any section. article: paragraph. sentence. clause, phrase or word in this ordinance. or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional r7i4 REC'D APR 211998 � ofS by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of the ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS /7 DAY OF , 1997. ATTEST: 1AN OR/641.41A —� CITY SECRETARY • PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS / DAY OF (irir, ()VA/ , 1997. ATTEST: MAYOR fiklAdt‘A• 416.14LCJ CITY SECRETARY • . EFFECTIVE: 9:abliv,70 i APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY D WP-F(LES'ORD-RES.A ORD679.WPD•kb r7A g REC'D APR 21 1998 3of s Proposed Street Name Changes „,,,,,_ 1 i + — , / L--= ! i / ....,,r......,F F—I i 1----1 piciOS \ I l a / I -�"C' tTr Ftc,N,• F es--I--� 1 ; i • 1 I� , TrTh i \,40,_L- ----,1 ----....... ....._______J .loggic„, i vp.skv.R k ,10;_i_ 'Li gorct' ci, , (r/r '1445- w‘ I , , : EArr ukcicio • I i l { II (I L 'LEH' I I c 4 . ,-- , i__ 1 , i , ,- cP ! 1 I i _, • , ,- ,, ,,, . 1 ; 1 1 ;H+1,'� / i E t 1 1 I 1 ; I • ( I 1 ti �f I `' 1 ;1 I ( �' 11 'I i ( I �; i i '' 1H— /' 1 ' 1 1 i - 1 ' ! 1 ( I ' 1 i I i , RV k 1 i i~ f 1 ,H ' 1 ! i / I �i I I nr-r-r-cin; i- ; 1 ; % ( , irs.tri1 : I •' 1 I -LJ . 1 1 1 1 1 -�"` r _ I 1 1 ` i« � c 1 City of Grapevine if. ..__. I I ! , !,-__LA 1 i H I ss; -3 0.3ttcot 1 Pl a.�tJ' 1 i (rjrff-- ( $ �'firh b all Pie _` .% 1 I -- ; I Q j!'IL — r I I ,ff ! Li .16'''' ' ''-- a Exhibit A -q ► 1 c-2--- I REC'D APR 1 19*' - _ _ City. of South lake N.Jut' 'IQ'` August 15, 1997 Mayor Beech Overhead Door Co. Rick Stacy 1000 S . Kimball Ave . M ayorProTem: Southlake, Texas 76092 (1,:i111) .)/(1/171 W.Ralph Evans Deputy Mayor ProTem: Subject : Address Change Pamela A.Muller Councilmembers: Dear Sir: Wayne Moffat David A.Hams GaryFawks A change in the name of "South Kimball Ave" located West ScottF.Martin of Crooked Lane Blvd. and North of E. Continental Blvd. To Crooked Lane . City Manager. Curtis E.Hawk A change in the name of "E. Continental Blvd. " located in Assistant City Manager. the area know as Heritage Industrial Park to S . Kimball Shana K.Yelverton g Ave . City Secretary: • Sandra L LeGrand On July 1, 1997, Ordinance •No. 679 was passed and (hwe approved. See attached Ordinance No. 679 with Exhibit A (area map of changes) . The known occupied properties affected are : Now Address New Address Pumpco 768 S. Kimball Ave . 2200 Crooked Lane Texas School of Baseball 900 S. Kimball Ave . 2100 Crooked Lane Beech Overhead Door Co. 1000 S . Kimball Ave. 2050 Crooked Lane Heritage Industrial Park 1100 S . Kimball Ave • If you have any questions please call me (817) 481-558'1 Ext . 742 . Sincerely, tl City of Southlakeyait Cirt — � can Bryson � �;' Cam-'- Encl : 1 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake, Texas 76092 (� (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-5097 �1►1- l AN ECUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' So f P►EC'D APR 21 1998 City of South lake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 98-027 Review No: Two Date of Review: 05/29/98 Project Name: Site Plan -for Specific Use Permit. Explorer Pipeline Meter Station and Terminal APPLICANT: PREPARED BY:: Explorer Pipeline Company )3.E. Steinberg- Explorer Pipeline Company 6847 S. Canton Tulsa. OK 74136 Phone : (918)493-5160 Fax : (918)493-5125 Attn: Fred Low CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/12/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 880. 1. Provide a minimum 8' screening device along the common property line adjacent to Tracts IBIS, 1B14,and 1 B (Zoned"MH"). (P&Z Action 4/23/98: defer until future site plan) 2. Provide sidewalks in compliance with the Sidewalk Ordinance No. 683 and the Trail Master Plan. Concrete sidewalks 6' in width are required on the south side of the property running generally parallel to the railroad R.O.W. and on the north side of the property along East Continental Blvd. Contact Ben Henry at(817)481-5581 extension 824 for applicability and design standards. (P& Z Action 4/23/98: delete requirement for sidewalks along the railroad) 3. Parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance do not specifically address this use. Staff recommends that a minimum of 3 - 9' x 18'parking spaces be provided and be constructed of asphalt or concrete.(P&ZAction 4/23/98: modify to require only 1 space) 4. Show Continental Boulevard as an ultimate 94'R.O.W. Label the R.O.W. dedication along Continental Blvd. as "Future ROW". Note the type of pavement(concrete, asphalt, gravel etc.)of all adjacent and internal roads. 5. Show all existing and proposed fire hydrants. There appears to be an additional existing fire hydrant not shown on this plan. Dimension hydrants to the nearest property corner. 6. Label the curb radius of the drives along Continental Blvd. A minimum 30' curb return radius is required. 7. The following changes are needed with regard to the adjacent properties shown on the site plan: a. Correctly show the lot lines and adjacent easements for Lots 1&2, Block 1,Fina Addition (Cab. A Slide 1476 P.R.T.C.T.). • City of Southiake,Texas b. Correctly show the current lot configuration of Lot 3, Greenlee Business Park. c. Change the street name east of Lot 3 Greenlee Business Park to "Crooked Lane". 8. Change "Special Exception Use" to "Specific Use Permit" in the Proposed Zoning information. * The previous plan approved by the City Council required that this site not exceed 1% Site Coverage. The plan presented at that time indicated the site coverage to be at 1%and was apparently rounded to the nearest 1%(Actual site coverage of previously approved plan 1.47%) . The site coverage of the previously approved plan did not include tanks shown as"Future Storage Tanks". The apparent reason for this and the site coverage limitation was to require processing of a new SUP prior to construction of the future tanks. The addition of the proposed 168 s.f. laboratory does not increase the site coverage of the previously approved plan since the actual constructed size of buildings 1 and 2 was reduced from 968 s.f. to 800 s.f. * The applicant should be aware that a new S.U.P. approval shall be required for tanks shown as "Future Storage Tank". * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records,a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * Protected trees cannot be removed outside of 12' from the proposed building without processing a Tree Removal Permit or without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Cuts or fills greater than 4 inches within the limits of the critical root zone of protected trees are not permitted unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Explorer Pipeline Company VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98027SP2.WPD C 7�- la • • • • (00, , 1 1 s 1 1 i "" / • —N ,v { t< V OS • 1 3U0.07+C LOCO MN OETAOL m.,• I • • ar `CO r O� ���� 4� s / W V(�� x Go, • VI �A -r44?( '� i$ EAST CONTINENTAL BLVD.......r S aril'a-1016.. �'r""'•'^ tl\ •.+' II w. „—_ ♦ P....•f / n...Rsa8....1 '1 --••• . 1,. POO a d \\ \ I il = 1 ✓' 1 II + I I P.1447A Jo'. • 1 r.'' ''.. / 1 ! : ,. \ gç ' 2--,— I];>L (.................._____4;(2.,./ . aAIM PIPPO Pars. i ew�rrrui� �e TR.( çA — I ( z.m.F. R YA• I‘• a :...‘r.g144‘ar''rI:k 111411: '...I A A. 1. ` • Y. ---4=-1, A, 4...f."---)— , .,,„7—_ -ir F i ji. a, 8 ( ; \ WAR,a.4 N a►u M--sA1.21' 1 I c 'Z X j la.0 i y Q 014MO.PM„Re. i��y { { 1 ma CA'.ORS tse. • `.••aoe : I •"_" ...I I ILlag"�• . I Nrio••e-r �°.MAW.NM R ~ .......... Cie I I ,o ma.M r SlaPalla' •: Lfs ca a• a se.Y. ..aa.•na. •P,ise Lai.../...M. I. cy• {II -I �` i N 1 - — --- , i 1.•L f..P , ;1'1 Y•.�'IL•S.lla b C4 Pa• f• I 1 P I. M M M• 1 i1 tlM.•R 2..MAPI f �•Is$ WOOL amlea NN,P.treats+. I ......NMr.w • - I '`�4a' �a.N.l..w.•YPmI { •...at P a4f I MO PPS w 4M PIAM fa.a_MM Met i , 3t' iAl IRON aLa..OD is u Emma MOW 1aMw.•AR sal..m►r ;1 ` 1• N 8r7T ' S.N•...•I urn.OW r IPA ea OM a•4 M..MMI 00a..e A 3 ` M.w.•...�_ .M-r-..LM I K I.ME op m�•�p.q•.•11•.a it LM I a..A M. IS AM I.O.[aM.Y MEM a.PPM `-� �� ,��`r .•I• �1���ra DPP +'� NOM••WOWS SI AMIN PA �3 t a m I•a q••.O a4 a/a OM•..YY 1iO K..•tl f.lN IOI• 'r-ii •• .� . . ^^,•� 1a.:.r..p•.. Ma• Ma•WM„. N•a Eli.• N l ��J'',� M Ms•u!•. r.N mM4 R e ,�•�yry f' % y.�•" ,l V• •p�t m�.•q. ,�.��g..fM.•mon PONT d ONM0.6 'A I a ' -�.w'' it tItNi NOS���i�.1�6nIAA PPS.0... .Mao Ur NarN \z ia1' :: .�/ J2s•0' I Naa r.IS WOO 4I M PO.AM -•I-EI LI.W.Na I OA .S �'1: �a ,,1•. I is r 4Na•.a=Z+.=P..= • •w - y i� Q1. a • O..M a.. s.r.a.•.MAI••..at. ��Az'. . P�Ei MM.WOO'11.,Pm MIOlirill ION 4 IUM roaY M MM w..a 1.aa L r:N LP Na.at•a..u..was • a i.l..•rFIS i+R/m"'MON isms ' � .aAPI•M r.NDAl-••LL R S-•A sew.vs!R+:. -- ..R-ZMW PI P al..l SWAPO a•AL / 'r wmmaaa ELM Pi ' +- M W WV.,..a a am gran•a. •f/ low a•aen WM►KM.•.o.2.al .waa,.ylp to M ON•R alms a S ..a•a sousama Ma amlr•If..ua3.K.h a mar SITE PLAN ¢ Maw.a.l.•a..l' .p w•aaailPal•IT OIP F WA a«•not MOM aw.ne.n fa•I SOUTHLAKE METER STATION AND TERMINAL o- rM•Sr PM PAN am1ML ea.r44. alai OM or•aI Swart m•a..A•M.. UMW COMM 7OMf NM a,a e saw... I,aE CDT W a(IIi11a.1aG IOW I .T no Po•NPP .•0 Nam we,r.to auk./••ara.... ow a spasm r sum 'r as t m.•I.1 •WYiI IA MOEN Mlm Pfd Ni 1 © ...•PM• Q•m..4 OR Al.Ir Ora a.•-Ma MP I ® ra.•I•Appel.• Os Lr el SOMA mar Asa ..•fa. 6846 SOUTH CANTON AVE. 04,aI. O..•I MP r 'Mk.• N.I.aM TULSA. OKLA. 74136 `• Dias w A .i....MK P FLOOP LOA ..YIP ttORA.a 11,1101, PI!IA ASV S. ir PIL at r- set (918) 493-5100 ••%®.loPat 555 s =I a loam RRL.wt NIOK PP.(ern.L1...N •i wontlaw,s see.• a Mt SP.M....•.OM LgrNa a..m N..P.M.Mon srarw.•r.r • i PM .mr M.L.. L.OMya we sea.. Mall.a,-nW farm Of•t s.t IOW aa• It.fa. �y • mKNY4•r In MIA. .••amp I-w•. r�..1m....fmm• OP Wail I•i M.•R• a-.-. C rCQ_ • PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN 7A ' /3 • ' MOVED SAMPLE ..wa». VICINITY MAP nr►LnrNm. Irn Sq. ri Ni. 4. .J1' • WwOEla WO. 11 O Ian EF} N c cei , IT- 40 DING LOCATION DETAIL c°4 ""n• p fet 4. �GD. sr „Jr'- a, la la 2` l .tvc�� fe . ��a aw MAC r a-w.l.0 OMIOR:t um-.wow I au•141w4w Raa•MGM) rn 6� T� 4� 44. II EAST CONnNE►�AI a ,.r: s ef'45'E letf�4' oMR OI. i" ti • re:• 7• I w 8 MP. • mat*OM W.M• w."w 3— Te . WOOL a mm*►xa ® • MAC : 0 TR. 181A W mNW,VW*NW, »4r 40 ---- ja Mae SU.stay) MC 4.. 'T � r - - • / •I. fllTll / I • ` • 0 • lr RM. 5 i . .t\-5/\-1 , i IL Ira I 9:1 - La �wa�w � 6 1 49•94--:. . : ecy Ce La M."t -- Ilum Oa ✓N 99 45 N-959.11 I.w..aw." a -T--. • * x CD } 4 In ,, w". 90 cfrivot A. rt a41 viva � R wq(atei = ROW a.tau 1.41 ,q.' i 40~ la 1 sm. 1 N WOW___ Il4a ova .—.. mm TY I ov taaElea Iw no IA a oarx or. a ataaa CC**.NI I01 a POW* ♦p4- t' P.O."al 214 R.1». ROM.Sal.MAW OWL Raa 3n1 11 � s� ,,; ry( ,w e' LOOM IZR Ian 0 a o 1 4 1 1 O `a1 RIGHT LEFT I `.. _ G ta: ..-(13 Ia1a loos MOE 0311P9N R rA 1a11Ea COWyy -- PROPOSED SAMPLE ' $ �xa son �• / YlIll %� BUILDING I I• ! l68 Sq. FT. "'///��T t i m �.._..st II 4In •N 89' Ya3�3t 0' REAR FRONT i ,`I `, , .S I LU, kolo �' . PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS FLOOR PLAN • � �ai�oq-�POW OF FEG1NNING -. 449 ,-:; gm4.ww twa.w. w jr.w.ww ma. l'\' ,tQ• .: �I.•..•�.alro ww w.e a w.WM IV 11114 MI MO MN 411 . .1 rir aw1.wws.= wvww -__. Qe.EI ,F.i.i .a. .Kea- r1�,zw�p�_I�wari. z-41 W � "iI17D 710Y r �w�11 - ;" �� r ..rwww. �. . wau1.■ ,�..w4 SO.w..�a-w rw MIwK e;1. "Ildraiwawwiw..sa /r a • Iw vwwI .w a't.4awalERua ft— .a UM • • CM Nab O�Ut • taws "'0 1212 TL•�'1R1a . s rraa®w COT tawta ROM.Daum 4...I..w w 1w wow au C .---- 'S's"Nali —MU M.--aw w warm*a a. »wa3 KU 311101 A 13,35 w. l Iws ®R moans aw w an sr 41•1011wA*11.4pNMIN 6....i OK .i.ura..a wwi 6 InSVSleare/to"."' 1a74 DOA ials Le • MOIL M.1w1 r C p MI MOM ® ?:S S.7.276e"r• ntp IaLaw V Or at gMEM owNM•IfAn WSW I ww muur aL r+aNE wo (etz)bl-wa alliCla ._. Imo suer as.I ramo WI.a Vaa11 RM r El MI Wee a IDOL MUM w.Ilw.r111wiwa Of news woos l.a.a al-fN • 1011.0 .maw 1"�w..lr.lw.l. I XITINIw"w 'I.. ri 1 l-f aw1IR at Sass_, LiFC ~:MR ZA98-027 _..ter wtw w. 1-13-4 Ilan Yw-4 aa1B L11-4 Resolution No.98-30 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR PETROLEUM OPERATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1B1A SITUATED IN THE . HARRISON DECKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 'NO. 438, TRACTS 4B ANDC SITUATED IN THE C.B. MCDONALD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1013, AND TRACT 1B SITUATED IN THE PAYTON R. SPLANE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1453, AND "BEING APPROXIMATELY '16.48 ACRES, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for petroleum operations has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "I-2" Heavy Industrial District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section. 451(26) of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for petroleum operations the property being legally described as Tract 1B1A situated in the Harrison Decker Survey,Abstract No.438,Tracts 4B and 4C, situated in the C.B.'"Mcdonald Survey,Abstract No. 1013,and Tract IB situated in the Payton R. Splane Survey, Abstract No. 1453, and being approximately 16.48 Acres, more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", and as depicted on the approved development plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this thrwe Specific Use Permit: 1. Resolution No.98-30 Page 2 (10' 2. 3. 4. 5. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy, Mayor (to, ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake, Texas L L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\98-30PET.WPD �� - (4 Resolution No.98-30 Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DISCRIPTION: A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE H. DECKER SURVEY, P.R. SPLAIN SURVEY, AND THE C.B. McDONALD SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 438, 1453, AND 1013, COUNTY OF TARRANT, STATE OF TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED: BEGINNING AT A POINT: SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF THE ST. LOUIS AND SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD AND THE WEST LINE OF THE P.R. SPLAIN SURVEY NO. 1453. THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 35, MINUTES WEST A DISTANCE OF 73.27 FEET (26.38 VARAS); THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 23 MINUTES WEST 514.45 FEET (185.22 VARAS) THENCE DUE NORTH 670.21 FEET (241.30 VARAS); THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES WEST 959.21 FEET (345.4 VARAS); THENCE DUE NORTH 598.16 FEET (215.16 VARAS); THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES EAST 1019.34 FEET (367 VARAS) TO A POINT, SAID POINT LYING 23.61 FEET (8.5 VARAS) FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE H. DECKER SURVEY NO. 438; THENCE DUE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE LINE OF H. DECKER SURVEY NO. 438 A DISTANCE OF 1267.93 FEET (456.5 VARAS); THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 23 MINUTES EAST 240.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES EAST 331.0 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT—OF—WAY OF THE ST. LOUIS AND SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 35 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE 403.9 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 16.48 ACRES. irl L . EXIBIT"B" l 1 ndt,p - ;{ ' . In All. 1JL '1 : ;V • .r. • B IIDNc LOCATION DETAIL �,�' mctl I ;ae.� ow• I \ 4.s�f/! sup. 'C' POD CO pryn.._. lain OHO:, ow.o.E-r (�<� ' R 0•eaareal 1.. ...\ \ R00-rPeCFW-ROC) 0.00. '90•) IL00-IMOewrl Qe0.PUMA) C,r�`' ��� \ \\ OttP ,T`^ s EAST CnNIINEN S 9'4$ E rats naa� rr \na .e. ! l� .e [r > \ 1 a. 'sf � . �\ua- � 2iE�� , ♦ ♦ ♦Y 0 R �0 ' - 0.F.N MKT 1 \ .ern ' , V M®PRIM motor _ RI.^ m mow/500 • 3 _ __ TR. 1BIA ou.MPS.1:31 MD . A lela I 1 ��. Ree-manna/ 01 Mt, s - N; pp pro.a � - \ �� • R e_ Igo I/.I. z assi 7 d _ • • - -� • iF Lw R Ie _ runic rttaYt_l N 89'45 N-959.2 t`w0e.1 mP� ♦ ` • _a 'l ct n PP9 IR Iel CD 15 ' p S,� ate."'L COMw•c.nn Oc`' •0 a MtSJ' '�wp $. OM := MOP Ca.0AA IWOS p uT 'r `O'ytQ-r tM 1 W't: 1 QI N MOANS 1.151.KBES C'" eP DOSED 1-3'wenIOJSAI ra 7 4t .•r 01 A C10001.m.RM. 1 1 0 % In 100 1 �^• •vim(WIPED.WIra A PIWOS ' •'•' Ir 0t PO ea a tit^rIII 9 - - a1Db1((WO.t 1/SPVC �S. OOPS.MPS Attnt5 li00 CPU ' I 1 . $ Ir 'Nru t �' j J `. b ena®mewees! eeelRaint�ev •- `4 FIGHT LEFT t _ c ' l- `. mt I / Ili '( eOCx t01.6 PRLI(COW. I'/ ♦0a[.92149.720, — M IT r 1 0♦f CAOMa l.St.RCS e• / ''',;L:glii ,.4,,, ,.,,, rierrnyrn ,iuri i, I tg A 1 1 rQU'll{.: • 1S I i FT IN , IL N89eTE-l3I O' / .,,6 PEAP FRONT r-z --Lira �. ('.3 TAM. : n • ,a PROPOSED BIJILDING ELEVATIONS FLOOR PLAN " �� 41ralq. / _ 4f a J/8'IR00 PIN 1;�:� ID' �a�% _ a _ '\. A S MS* "+M17v1s m pia 1rO.=1:17776,7 sag x( { 10 e ie�'n w .'J,,.E1. SI rrwca.�Lr:. ae+-es IN ae.M.a .Sy. ., ..m a.....mr S. / OW avn I.,TM _s 1 .s.ra pr ; RSAEm•.n...at..n)SPLO C a5C RPrn (sase, 1 • was m a.1.t a RAa(0 co....Ranaxs 1.n A. ag M.nl LRAM I.al p. � � AlCOM GR RRN:[m1 °4:w A vl nr PO P a.M nal�t 0 MI K SUMO Illawa M EMU SS.* a.:mrE..r�s:v:::a alums Reese OOe0Re1 RE m a aM S00P UPON M. R.S.004. MP • PUP awn it PM MS)•113-3100 © ^"'•• m =Wag.:'iP:LM•...ElRM NONE gri NO.(817)•et-weD .aM-.Ir., .aaeNI Mt OM fa all NMI* OIS /1 IeM 1.1-SrM s.� a 1n .mn d I L♦C a IfIO 1U-Sm aM1 1,110.11[�>e OS Gl �•..e..,1POeR�D I_A_.I` ZA98-027 a.e.�v.�.. re. -15-Y WM: (-I1_q R80 1-1I_M • City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-032 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-276 / 2nd Reading / Zoning Change/ Lot 1, Block 1, Rougemont STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Rougemont, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1605, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 14.782 acres. LOCATION: East side of North Peytonville Road approximately 200' south of the intersection of Brittany Court and North Peytonville Road. OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Sharon and Yves Meyer CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty (20) RESPONSES: Six (6) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Jerry and Cynthia Brewer, 960 Brittany Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor of. (Received 4/29/98) • Susan and Robert Jones, 1065 Brittany Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor of. "Absolutely in favor of preserving the last few remaining lots with natural beauty. Consistent with land use plan!" (Received 4/30/98) • Melanie Horn, 1301 Wakefield Court, Southlake, Texas, undecided. "I have heard conflicting information about a road dissecting the property and continuing its march to Dove Road if they decide to sell front 7 acres in the future." (Received 5/3/98) • Alan Egerton, 696 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "We purchased our lot at an inflated price purely for the private setting. We had no objection to Mr. and Mrs. Meyer's first (or- zoning change, however we feel this change will encroach on our privacy, very much!" (Received 5/6/98) City of Southlake,Texas • J. Scott and Brenda Matheis, 955 Brittany Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "1) Loss of privacy due to future construction of homes and/or roads. 2) Damage to property caused by removal of large trees along property line should there be construction of homes and/or roads. 3) Loss of property value due to damage to property and lack of privacy. 4) Loss of safety and security if homes and/or roads are built bordering us on 2 sides." (Received 5/5/98) These property owners have withdrawn their opposition to case ZA98-032 by letter. Please see attached letter(Received 5/6/98) • Russell and Lana Holley, 692 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, undecided. "I want more to know who and what is going in behind our property. I need a set back." (Received 5/7/98) P&Z ACTION: May 7, 1998; Approved (5-0). COUNCIL ACTION: May 19, 1998; Approved (6-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "RE" Residential Estate District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-032Z.W PD L L May 5, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 re: Reference No.: ZA 98-032 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, After speaking at length with Yves and Sharon Meyer regarding their zoning change request, being informed of their reasons for the requested change, and being assured that no changes would be made to our common property line, we wish to withdraw our "opposed to" vote and submit a vote in favor of their request to re-zone their property from "AG" to "RE". Thank you, J. Scott and renda Mattheis 955 Brittany Court Southlake, Texas 76092 488-4900 ,,,, REM) MAY 0 61998 o w Qcn c� •c a W .-1 'I r o a a= 0 0 ° LL (IIPe InW 0 ♦/1 N Q � y,in ma sr N czA r. ULI> 1 1 ►a t.f) '" 1 Q o i 1 a LL. _ C U i z P cc Q to a" T W ec N o Z 0cc W W 3 = Z CC a MIN 'CC :I- Zas as O Z}- Q N ' did. N- Q ..- _1 Fs Hj VeZ " W p J � 0 Z 2 cc QQ w ,..,.. ua m 7 0 CIS z in • a Q �, Cl x 7 0 '......o O --m CC i N I-- W N U Z 0 Z Q , H 2 I _ .;c:,_ cc 1 : s i • ‘‘, r4. 3 3 - . .t voir.Fsnoar ,R 0.:3'I'IIANOLA d N . $ R 44 J ut '. Z MI W J.sc Q Q L' .- i w Q aZc w j . l'' o - g n 75. o a N J I . ° 3 3 n • . -m 7 n a N � , i cci rib- 4, s 1 N CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-276 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ROUGEMONT AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 14.782 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; (161+ PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 1 Cie these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the (hire rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 2 altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 1, Block 1, Rougemont and being approximately 14.782 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "0-1" Office District uses. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to (b..• lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 3 n Q n Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until fmal disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. (tiar' MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G:\ORD\ZONING4i80.145 Page 4 1.1)_ I L C APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: (No' G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, Block 1,Rougemont, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1605, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 14.782 acres. (ow' G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 6 r7R v- )a City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-033 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-277/2nd Reading/Rezoning and Site Plan-White's Chapel Methodist Church STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner,481-5581, ext.787 Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as Tracts 5G, 5G1, and 5H situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being approximately 10.875 acres, and a Site Plan on property legally described as Tracts 5G, 5G1, and 5H situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and Lot 1, Block A, White Chapel Methodist Church Addition, an addition in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas,according to the plat recorded in Volume 388- 204,Page 12,Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a total of approximately 15.53 acres. LOCATION: East side of South White Chapel Boulevard approximately 300' south of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). OWNER: White's Chapel United Methodist Church APPLICANT: Tie Davis-J. Murray Smith, Architects CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "CS" Community Service District REQUESTED ZONING: "CS" Community Service District LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public NO.NOTICES SENT: Seventeen(17) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Dr. Greg Wright (Gcsw, Ltd.), 200 East Southlake Boulevard, Suite 30, Southlake, Texas, in favor of. (Received 4/27/98) P&Z ACTION: May 7, 1998;Approved(5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 1, 1998, amending Item #4 (sidewalk) allowing location to be determined by staff, allowing Items#5a-5d as shown, and deleting Item#16 (articulation). IC t City of Southlake,Texas COUNCIL ACTION: May 19, 1998; Approved (7-0) First Reading subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 15, 1998, per P&Z recommendation and requiring sidewalks to be placed no later than when the adjacent sidewalk is constructed. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 1, 1998, with the exception of those listed in Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 15, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-033ZS.WPD • L . _ .- --..II ! I ' ' I 1 • ' ' -''\.!>''',•--. : !il 1 • 1 I .,••• , t __-- • • • . , I . , ; I COMMI i ; • i I I anew's' 1' i , i 1 H-7-- L SCHO ;: OL . I • I i .j t---7----/!--7,71.--1 . I !---; 1 \ /.,/ ....,,,--: 1, I . • ' ; k.....3 I ,i: ,.....r4_,....— IIiii , ...- , I , I I 1 H / I r ..,-----' ------- , .......--•• • ! --I ! 9,140 . ,---— ..•••• . I"--!1 H--1' ,t :I cc,5 NIES . ,r--1----; ; —, , ,....-- , , , \ , I , 1, s,.-;-----:-._------77'—,'---tr--! ,.. / A' --- ,t IF ng' I : • . i i i °---21_, 1 1 ....,••• ""': ' — •...i..riur•.- - 1' :.•,. ;---7----:-.t '.__It---- -7 del •'-- . - _.........r;17:1 .---1 , , , . ..... . • ESINIt5 ' . 1 i , 1 !----'! • \ /*/"....**'. .,.. .............,.._..— .--. ..., ' • \H..5...._seLi‘\ 'S '___SSIN, 4-----___ , , I ! ! ! ! . , ,. ! , • .- / .---___ _____._.-',-- ---.: ---::' --,_______--- 1, \1 N. 7 4. ; , /. 1 1 ,,• \ 1 ! 1 , g -,:-------, vo il / / ITT,) ,,ta1- 1--Lj--- i---T--7=4- I'--- * ; ,i -----7-___4_1_ . t 0416 i 1, .N.,' •; 1 • / I t ! • , o' i 1 : i I 1 Q,__ . riCa/94MY ; • '--iw 041 ,..k_i_ , ii ! — 413-,.' ' E v . . 35c. scuntfrxr a.so ,--__ikco • , , • :,,,! • -•, , • , , i - \ \ :! , 1 , ---- I . 1____I i ! • i ! !DI,,G\ . . , :i• . • ---7-77-- -:._______'C\ . I NIIIIIC -,--7!--7--,„---,„ ,--1 r--,...::;„, •. ! I I -•. , • El . II 1---..-1--.H, \I l'ff I I t • „ , , .-___.--,.3,esqz---• : .t.: • .i ! , 1 , • ______?..,' ________ ,..,.. I—. _t — 3.:114 ,.....„_-,' , ,----. ' _1103:1:D • 1 \ ,/,'/ ___.—gorik • ,---..i.„_"-- !' , r---: ---.--- r"1—!r--1 1 • / t------, I 'ecLIKOP14- 'air aurr EASI f‘, 7-7 1 f I .----2,----1/ ! : • 1 / Lii T....' I kiltiEli— 1 ' Yr.-1 f ; i •=---`` ,;. r..5:04 .:.--..,E"'•cer=-...• -"Ik... 7.- , f--- i ! , I 7 1 41.k 1 I I r--7 • 1 1 , . . . ' • •— s• ••••• 7..",... ...,.:„. 1.---,.......„..:,,,..,.. *7•,.......i r,........./ ! ,___-.-4 ‘14°. ' 1 . ! i I f 1 I .1/2. I - • , , , • : 's ::::....,----t .„.„______>;•***---: n i 1 ! f I • . ; ;I'• .1, --s----____.-'1....‹ !---• ; • f , , i ....."'" • , Oil' t 1.-- ! , - ' i ; ' • , ,,--•-------.‹ . - it" s 1 I I I I I ! •or0 \ \.,./- 7'-' ' ' ! I I 1--1,J..... ...,17...N.,7 ,\ ,A).•-.7 . .17---- -1.7t... .'•,..-7----...---:. ..--71-7 ',--1! ---, t•i t.. ..i-•:: , I I , i (_,..._-, 7•-• r -.," ...,-, „,.. -.--..:27,-- ' • - -'-.--•;* '.,' '''•,..•--'—::-'--., -':--1. . --...... ........... ,..,_....1%,„-••°,.` .......__,. ... -..„ .• - .-,........ L.: azILL./ 1 1 r---H___,__--•' 'ilik4g-t 7.2\\.,•-•‘"--- — ! .;-j \ ,.. . \''; • I '----.-----.-'" -',. L-1_2-._. ! CAA •. '! 1 ! ..• '\ ' • . - _.----=---- ---- .4.k....e.-•-• erlAWC.P..,/ .t..1.0.1.6.* ' / ' / . "...........-1 1 • ,11----h\e''-!-----'—'N', , ....- ',.— , --r------',."1,,---- L_:_.—___7==:1---i—A —101 ' ' ;s, I 1 1 i ./ ' : 1 „..•:•••,!_!!_._____!_--2-- s.----,./ A...--- . i -• ; '-‘,•—- --------. ----- ' • - !--r.77-----11-- • , „ , : ..1 . 1 . , :,,,. \,....----7-••:! , , —- ---7.; , - .. Comer b -....,,1-1...... . .. ........_ P----r-!,--- '----,-- --- 3 . I--: :r.7.27' _ .. . -- --- -- ; ---d-cfe(t. -- ---. ' '-- _- ,... . ---: -- -.- !--- -- -. - .':_., -----___ _ 1 '.-----.1-.---4;''-.-, ,_ '-•--, 0A VO''. ,6' ,e•—.—_ • • --- , s • ' ! zr • rk ,•' .....1-- --It. --- - - -•- i i .7 .' ''' ' - - • `... ...'-`,, "....---., 1 7C —3 -4,........; • . , , ...._......;.....i....:__L--_ . . .:!:..._.;......_ i_ 1 , , 1 .. ! TRACT MAP 1 1 : , / • ‘• .—. , •••• , , i 1 1 I ! ! . i ! I '-'... .---:•,---.3.( k ..., \ '••••• 1, '. 1 I I •............ .. . ___.,...-2.1 „.• •, .., ,- , i I . .,.. ..- . _ • 1121° 7 �g S R 2 7 0 8 1.021t z . sA ; "� C7 «/�—nwA .� , "'' 9A1 ' C L ' -� S. BRYAN 4 F.'P_UTT GCSW, LTD.; • O - I + r3 ," 53 r.. r 12A I 122 W. HALL �y,z — « 1 1 A SURVEY SF 1 A _ _ ----,Si' 4 � A-687 9: - - - - - � y tOB 118 y 129- - - IA _ _ 1.0 AC j TR 1 .78 AC A, , 40 -`'7:-:- ` 1- TI` ' "0-1 " ( a � �, F ,-�1 y"���"TR 1 �3� z,.,�. 15A G. LECHLER " ,....' 1 A .79 A4 8 1 "AG„ 1 a 't KE I 1 T)4 110 . i 6 14,4 S. GARRETT r m 1 e TR TR 301 C - . AC TR 5F TR SE 1.0AC 1 • 10.0AC 5.916AC A-55 ` ;AG• -" zio TR 3D ® AREA OF REZONING s 98 AC R A I - i D. TOLLET ® AREA OF SITE PLAN • • IOMPSON 1 1.2 6€0 1 "SF-1 A" .. ,» . . tie B. SMALL "AG" A. WEST A. WEST B. SMALL TR TR 2A1C - 3 1.0 AC F. - 2A2 'AG' TR 2A5 L.4 TR 2A1 F. TR 2A1D . SMITH .AG. 1.93 AC .84 AC m. H. ADJACENT OWNERS 11TR 2A1A TR 3F - AND ZONING 4.23 AC _ AC) (1.00 AC) A /►_�1R 1 A r9c_q NC 3Q�F 13 14 = us 10 Y Na.• 3659.GCD 17i D/263 LI I�TII"«. 'U. eea t lb la ' ILIA M EIJI .I.11. MC TAMER CHM� DM1�■AIM T y~/ �w 0.... , �' L I MI•'M• IW.M' Ip.q• Ill.Z7' 7I1.I1' !7f7.'tr. • y I► p - MSvll 0 V' J I. elk N w h� OR I.A1. •if r V �� ••l . Om LE C i0 ►� k l u Aa Sped Mona 0•a•Ir j . .;. b l • I►_ ilit • 4s. 1 nAl o t•M MM r u t ..*.a;�: • I.. t4.l + a f• ,40- _ / • UM li..ae. / r'�' • MI Mr PM Val r '% . N�.a I R to forµi0.1 /z �.. v..a ti / tt . N r It.1r 0 CO I t? .0.�.01- • ur7.r la•.I. 'te Nl.'OO L i .'i.VW Goa Islf..l1 nt �Irrp.,u. _ '—rrll� r.90:. ,, tN•.r•. OIL �ILr.yly •P-.. 14►L • ..\ • TPA Lrsam17•�V•• a �1 yr war,WI 17•l7- 1 17..•'! Sri 2l Nam: �� tea. : may .. • nit be:abject b dr A:psr Ord•MM. • D.Tr060.maid +7 40 is Vain.CGS 6," Iw..A t�.x el,':1.: ',`- i tu, P.9.6L OOES NOT Wee NI kt v�`il... • beri r P.11C,r.d Ito we ilea ��r r • 1►l r ►.la r1 - '; 'O'i- 1 IAi U� Q'Fa ;N s L L..ti Arm dCa 7.yA • • r Pwe r..r • e ! • t 11 .V 4 . '•:\ I '...} I . I I t.% i..1 . V Z Y ,J , TKO L ,,,,4 t. ...,.........• 11.1 i+i iiI 4+1 / 1 I I I 1!'171 IPi+14+I - 1 4: .jJJI1i1itHtU1\f IIIII{ �~'' I ►1ii 1 111+i ;PH.4! I # I11 111 v. ? zI I I 11 I i•!i ,►H4I tr? W{III 1 I —, I ` r► z rI. C� . i i.oz.4x e�6 ' • 1r f I lI«± •I• *»« lull :• , •8 • • G Y^: "• 1 !'i f, :',..r. �l ',..lei a • • • I[1a Flea / > Ir P ••. OIi \ -/ sir • am m • 9. ti"M1lr / tc.�ea • p ►l r.• • • •.,.•• ........ Tract • z r Ds IPL �i �Paw�. �.« 0... II./40.SO'V Ar.. Iri. 674.97' err la.. d n:�1 /\ I I� �7Pr.�a/�rr..ti L..... I r..r I 0.1.r:1 2 Trawls 1 Orr:1 3 tract.I I �-----AV.V.fMe5T. V .1.1 0 6 5 I.Peg.2 21 I �1< -------- Iry M. 5.1. Velma 9 7 6 7.Pa 14 2 4 > I I 0A'C.T. DALCT. C _6 \ 17 FEC'pAPR 0b 1998 j ,• ;a ;K I 119142.1.111 1.VW(s 1 e. 1 LLY 7 •II f 17v4(1 elk! s�_ i jryl e3 ~w.wMq 7.3JAl,w ~ i7 _� . u a Lr _ eil ;L . I.-*q - I'lJ ' i g'-1<'... 111 I j, ;. ,t L . t , ,, 133 -rrl�• L. a I Ai bl C [ r �i Evy as Srn_]t�aC rI i e w �O v 0 e` •, 1 - • �I is. 1 ia. - tp Ea .. V [ O zllyMMJ F, 3VCu $gCfI� Yyy�, _ I mg _ �•z .1 Y1- �J-e - _ e �El 3 ri 1-. "�' ♦♦ yQ2 i //J 3 I ' - _t a F es-_ / Z 1 1 . . e c c r —s 1- ...en ni-•I „a1M1.�3tI I 1 r. .4 ,,olXi aajit� IFt oo _ — s •ems u fl 1 ..ti i W rt. Z 7 ee('e• -- hh OC 11wINV•W al - . _' 1 ..„ _ O Y. ,• ■■',{{. - N.• ,>�..e: ! ';'gyp W Ly,r I s� > 1 o] I�v -- cr Ip3 rn OC �I1 t� I I 2I R . 0 `. I ` 4, C ,� 51`- to> '. S. 1;t-1 Q ac j a. t. `ai.of I =� p~� v$2„ J t ,►• Vv �V "V jyV Seer i P ' o`u _. c"�� w kJ li Vs "s—s�Y o 1]9 lz 11/4._ 2 I ® o. yo• ^ ap dd cc L ppp of x • _i__,.. 1 g 19 '''-i-N:\ Q / j I di • ; S :Y e 1. 1 4- v a' QZ �1 IY 2 1 S� as �i o ' Z ~ V• IM r w 'i !_-I III �» 4. MISS •r.,e..v. 1 am AY. , -- u i $ r o k% Q' '<z a� 4_', x it it <4;r N r az tr ie _\,� A da LT I u ��i3c :& �r' '1 W11 - o i -11 41s1 A� v , • City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.:ZA 98-033 Review No:Two, Date of Review:05/15/98 Project Name: Site Plan-White's Chapel United Methodist Church APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: White's Chapel United Methodist Church Davis-J Murray Smith Architects 185 S.White Chapel Blvd. 3106 Fairmont Southlake.TX 75092 Dallas.TX 75201 Phone (817)481-4147 Phone : (214)748-1616 Fax :(817)421-3248 Attn: Rev.John McKellar Fax : (214)748-3380 Attn:Tie Davis CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/11/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ORNEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. (880). 1. Note the location,type,and height of all walls,fences,and screening devices.A minimum 8' screening device is required along the east property line.The screening device may be either solid fencing or dense plant material. 2. A 6'concrete sidewalk is required along the south side of F.M. 1709 in accordance with the Sidewalk Ordinance and Master Trail Plan. 3. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634.Please note that all driveways shown are existing: (P&Z Approved all drives as shown) a. A minimum 500' spacing is required along F.M. 1709 between full access drives. Non- residential drives along arterial streets require a minimum 250'of spacing between drives and 200'spacing from street intersections. Non-residential drives are not permitted on local streets unless no other public access is available. Specifically address the following: 1) The spacing between the two drives along F.M. 1709 is approximately 133'.Please note that the eastern most driveway is gravel. Driveways must be constructed of an all weather surface material(asphalt,concrete). 2) The northernmost drive along S.White Chapel Blvd. is approximately 130'from the existing intersection of S.White Chapel and Pine Street and is spaced approximately 125'from the next large drive to the south. 3) The large drive,just south of the northernmost drive on S. White Chapel, is currently located directly at the intersection of S. White Chapel and Pine St.and provides no spacing from the intersection. 4) The four drives along Pine St. (south of the main structure)provide non-residential access along a local street. -- nc=I • City of Southlake,Texas b. All driveways accessing the parking area require a minimum 100'stacking depth.Stacking depth is measured from the R.O.W. line to the nearest intersection of a drive lane or parking space. The following do not comply: 1) The two driveways intersecting S. White Chapel Boulevard have stacking depths of approximately 15'. 2) The two driveways intersecting Pine Street have stacking depths of approximately 18'. c. A minimum 24'and maximum of 40'driveway throat width is required on all non- residential drives. The two driveways intersecting F.M. 1709 have throat widths of - approximately 12'to 15'. The driveway at the intersection of Pine Street and S. White Chapel Blvd.has a width of 65'.The two driveways on Pine Street accessing the Youth Building are 20'in width. d. Show and label all curb return radii.A minimum 30'curb radius is required on all driveways to be used for fire access and a minimum 20'curb radius is required on all other non-residential drives. 4. Dimension the distance from building corners to the two nearest property lines. Specifically, dimension the"Youth House",and the "Parsonage".Provide dimensions from the nearest adjacent main structures to the accessory buildings which are to remain. 5. Label the floor area of the existing church building,the proposed addition and the parsonage on the graphic. 6. In the site data summary chart under"Lot Coverage"verify/correct the Total Building Area, correct the Total Lot Area to 676,587 and the lot coverage percentage.Verify the floor areas shown in the upper portion of the site data summary.. 7. ' Show,label,and dimension easements on or adjacent to the site. Ensure easements are in conformance with utility and/or construction plans.Note any easements required to be abandoned. Specifically show and label the existing 15'D&UE running along the north east and south lot lines of Lot 1,Block A White Chapel Methodists Church Addn. Show and label the needed utility easement for the proposed fire hydrant. 8. Show,label,and dimension all fire lanes.Include all curb radii dimensions and all fire lane curvature adjacent to the fire lane. A minimum width of 24'is required on all fire lanes. Fire lanes must be provided as required by the Fire Marshall. 9. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord.480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the building within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. In addition there appears to be some discrepancy between the dimensions shown on the site plan and that displayed by the elevation renderings. (P&Z approved articulation as shown) r1C • City of Southlake,Texas * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan.A separate building pennuf is.required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat Revision must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records,a fully corrected site plan,landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: White's Chapel United Methodist Church VIA FAX ABOVE Davis-J Murray Smith Architects VIA FAX ABOVE LACOMDEV\WP-F LEAREV 98\98033SP2.WPD • • Articulation Evaluation No.2 Case No.ZA 98-033 Date of Evaluation: 05/15/98 vations for White's Chapel Methodist Church Education Building ived:04/08/98 e 8 ce Elevation#1 South Wall ht.= 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation R:.uired Provided Delta Oka ? R-.uired Provided Delta Oka ? Max.wall length Min.artic.offset 2 10 400% Yes 2 5 150% Yes Min.artic. length 7 10 43% Yes 5 20 300% Yes Elevation#2 East Wall ht.= 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation R uired Provided Delta Oka ? R uired Provided Delta Oka Max.wall length Min.artic.offset 2 10 400% Yes Min.artic. length 8 10 25% Yes 10 34 240% Yes Elevation#3 North Wall ht.= 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation R uired Provided Delta Oka ? R uired Provided Delta Oka ? Max.wall length Min.artic.offset 2 10 400% Yes Min.artic. length 5 20 ' 300% Yes 011ievation#6&4 West Wall ht.= 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation R uired Provided Delta Oka ? R uired Provided Delta Oka ? Max.wall length Min.artic.offset 4 4 0% Yes Min.artic. length 11 21 91% Yes 12 45 275% Yes Ci n - la1 • ' .. .......f....: •-,,,.t.,.14..-:,--.--; . -, ..- .- - - ., ,_. • - :-. . . - , .. II f li . '.• • .va A.,..4'...4-4., f. -.•-•11.'"4*.ttgio• ! - "...."..4 1 . I 11 a gai'li if ...,' ,tr n i..r•mu INO li i .51 p /I ,..v.....,..v del J i'' , , • .....,t...4,,.....„4.74.0ft ' 1 1 I iii. 244 ...-.,,w,..L.,..,„ t tzs - 1-'1 3 z I 1 le Pln :. 1 1 I : 1 k. / 41----' i ...... ,.......... .--r - P l 1 Vii t rf '1.' ii-11 rt &e ., s -i .ilit: i ii ig_ i p @all 4i ; i•-• f'. Air lilt!' J.! ! 1 " i! ti';i i ,_ i: lit ift.IA Ig.c ):1 :J.1) ..,'IEitt;,/ il d I 14 ii f 1 t..',4 - 71*- :12 'L, 10,110 .-i.101 ... 1\etai --,--,i i' 1 1.41 Ali- I 1 III ,-. i 4 ' li 311411%131k )111 I ilk .e. . i'-,. i,littiPisiblr,, ii 1!.!eill,r. i- t-: it niiiiiIIIILI1 iSt igtir!e,- _ It 1 11 •/ 1 .\\ f ' i%. i- v, ' i te : iiz • (y. i-• 1 T- i_- f--1—f• 1-1 F8 -4-- I T--,_-1-I,.. 1 1 •- ' Il — Zi i( —1H1.,.'... I. -i-- - - 'i ilr• iIIi i1IiiT ll1ii1i•l-,5ti';1-/A11r101"d-!z .:• ),1 1 I 1 1r 1 111111 1 1: 11111111- -I _ t Z 1 -—1—. .• 1 —, i i --LE :' . i -_-:-. 1 ti - i___ --T— i _. _ '''" " 1 ...1 l: I 11 II 1 1 I 1 illtittill 11-I f I L--7-=— 4tff- .'4 ! —- 4:- : ''. -;9x,s5v Mi' I 4%:.:, 1 '11111111111 Iv,fk\AP444.-----=Pk, . ... , 1 1 -. .i.; il -- '4' - - i,A.4, 1 J Li Ii.L __ 1 4 1 J [ 1 1.: 4•Ven9V4r , 4•SI ;,.,.. i , , , , ...„, ..,„ ,L . ,., ,,,. 4 „,.,, .,. . c, , • 4 • . . ' ' r . i •Q`1% -i' i it ,ii0 y. • . -- -T----i hal! . r . .! , .—. 1 1. ,,,s, 1 .' '/'"„1 .-- It 1:,.' II: •-.':-‘•:•!.",' . --3 . i=51-!-..til PI 1 -W. 11 I--- 1 1 i t '1 .?- -- • . t:, • -I i-- --L ; ID • i tz ( ,. s : .1, 4:— It li : .1, ,„ i• , I. .... 4 1. . : „L,„ ....,.., 1 / 1 ir ---g---i * Ve'ii:. 1 ii....---.- I [ 1-----7_:.: w : — _ It's' l' ' re'l'-'4'1--:---4.---'rIii t i . _. .,,...,,,,_;:. - —1—•Cor.4.r...../.. i 1 k 1 t• • 4 t t A --1: ii Jill ii li it li • (----N /--k I 411-1'i 11 ,.t:11 SL 11,0 ilk i ::.,•.„... „ ..., .:, II i k --__ Pal ;1 .1 / 1.1.., -':-......... ---- — 4-.4 .2 lt'4,1 '1 : - •--i -: : . . ,‘..... ,.•:"-,:,i--3 --,... ,, Eel!Ptij Atill)1a11.1 !!..IN N.:•• •• PS SS i - ,,. ... . , ... . ! I/ F.----liti1-1,6:;4.:1111', 14gi.i11111-3.- . .. .. .. Oil l'il Illiliglinl:Ir Rnlel i!.,.11./1.11 / .-( .,j--F=______----7721- ..... . s41ililigif 14.411 --.. "..."--7 ,,C. 4J: 4iii,LAvliii !;tkik Nlilaittplii0lavii cf" _ .._.., ,....--------- .. ,Itun....s. ---"?............_,._,...., i i 3)-!,44.zilliiit. •,,,,,,, --„. ) . C i 11 ; . lij i i-4 r. SI { 4 r: I • . 1 ., . 0 i . C . , ! 1 A.„ .. lim IMI 1 LI! ,. , . ,is 11 rs , 14 i! Zil a 1 , ce ;I FR: �: ■ i I11 j = i . i 3,1 e1011 . - ^ k2_ i1 a, . ; r . ,. . .1i. , . : il 1 : i J4I • 1E1 l- I :' fall . N. INI 1 1:110 ll . . . i ••, I.,: I awi . 1(---_. (01 1 0111' AMA / INN . -.. _/ ' f . r -� Fr MI III ■ yIy ! 411I • + Y •El . ail • a iU I i El , i (:- 'I � - I. I 1 •• , . i ,1 . 141 ."0 1211 I -4HI �:: 11t1L I ;`I 1E1 1 I I tt.71, 10. ?.- , • • C . _-_____ ...,____, , .� , . . i . ' . • • ‘..„.. ...41,,..›..,474.0 ..,.....„ 1'7 \\\\./.......:••••..../....... ...,--Th___%•`•"--------.........„_____=, 1 AQ) , • -..,... ..„.. ....... . .. . ...., N.,,,. \...,-)....... \ ....Pe rt.* • ,•...o., . -----------1- d 1.. • \i‘. CO . 01 1 CT) i 00 ..\•-t. ..i..• .• „t; , ' 1")2 -... II III IIIIII I 1 / / I • ca. .. ,-% • 1:, g 'PI ( . ..„ \ .... 41111Ni,_ ale a i C--...;•-----:::/ \_______--:— ." i 1 _ \ 1 i \ -' . ' 86. 111. ___ \. \ C. ... Rik..N... NI 1 li g is, ts--- .\ .. . • •6.41h NII . 1 • lilt:. . k• L III I \ Th . . . . ,. \ k\-= --......,. .• 1111•111111, 74-.1 LI Li Mill . 1 ( • lI'L. . _, r„i•_____. .._...... 1 Q. _--- ........ ,....Poir• ,...,..- '-.4...\ I\ Wail I • fr I •Nit --:::.."-r _,V( -., •at i - _,. {Om •6.Mg, W .,.. . L • ........41,11,17 _.../..) ..„,-. ./ . ,L 4...\\:real' ... • o•-•• . ? . -----,.. ____":1V- /-...... , ! / --- / I .......... /III/7,.... •1./' I i;:°%"...411 ...% . s.•;., 1 I :-. 44 , • 7 .1,....,* / ,/. e\',i . '.4.- A , • ... rt :I/ / i I / /_____T-wilk I ) s • , _--__ I , -. , • ... _.... ."111111 ... • . f • , - ., -...4_ ... i low4,:.• .4 ii. q ' .• II/1 . . • .... . i . ;. ..... ...WO *sow "'Mine , ., • \ • . * - .4%.- • ......-- .0 ik • = lr ...... .1.• •••• i pv. ••.-1• • ..r. ,.. ...3,1 . • - :,.,2.,'::...-...----.."-:::.::.... ..-----..;.... % ......-- • en., 1,_ . -... - '' -2.• CaO . . • • --..._ . . . %.--------' .,...--- I . CO ' ---- . ' ---.-.= .---:---------,-' -- -\-___--=::---------- -i-----' 6.4..... • - 14."1460 4 4111. ri C.'' )3 . . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-277 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING TRACTS 5G, 5G1, AND 5H SITUATED IN THE O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 10.875 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING (re CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 1 l_/` il ' �4 • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does fmd that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest L clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does fmd that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City G:\ORD\ZON I NG\480.145 Page 2 `i (s • of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tracts 5G, 5G1,and 5H situated in the O.W.Knight Survey,Abstract No. 899, and being approximately 10.875 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "CS" Community Service District as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been ce made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance G:\ORD\ZON I NG\480.145 Page 3 �1 C 1� • shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. (1161.' PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.l45 Page 4 v.- I9 CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Cy' G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 5 (1C- 18 EXHIBIT "A" Description for a tract of land in the O. W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 899, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of a tract of land described in a deed to JOSE A. PEREZ AND WIFE BEVERLY PEREZ, recorded in Volume 4485, Page 365, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and also being a portion of a tract of land described in a deed to WHITE'S CHAPEL METHODIST CHURCH, recorded in Volume 4500, Page 485, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described as one tract by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1-1/2"iron pipe found,said pipe lying by deed call,220.0 feet South and 229.0 feet East from the northwest corner of said Knight Survey; THENCE South 86 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 94.00 feet to a 1/2"iron pin set with cap marked,"AREA SURVEYING"; THENCE North 07 degrees 13 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 244.69 feet to 1/2"iron pin set with cap marked,"AREA SURVEYING"in the south line of East Southlake Boulevard; THENCE South 74 degrees 11 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 29.81 feet along the south line of East Southlake Boulevard to a 60d nail found at the beginning of a curve,concave to the north,having a radius of 1,959.86 feet,and a long chord which bears 281.81 feet,South 79 degrees 20 minutes 12 seconds East; (re THENCE Easterly along said curve,passing through a central angle of 8 degrees 14 minutes 44 seconds a distance of 282.05 feet to a 3/4"iron pin found at the end of said curve for the northeast corner of said Perez tract; THENCE SOUTH a distance of 1,097.68 feet to a 1/2"iron pin found; THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 674.97 feet to a 5/8"iron pin found in the east line of Pine Drive for the southwest corner of said White's Chapel Methodist Church tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 102.08 feet along the east line of Pine Drive to a 1/2"iron pin found; p abt59 RECO APR 0 81998 DOC THENCE South 89 degrees 41 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 254.63 feet to a point in a pond; THENCE North 01 degree 47 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 613.46 feet to a 3/4"iron pin found THENCE North 83 degrees 28 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 32.06 feet to an axle found; THENCE North 00 degrees 40 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 200.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,said described tract containing 10.875 acres of land. G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 6 1C.,— 19 (sr EXHIBIT "B" r A v.- -wt. rr1 — 114 _� i t 1 tSeE i1 ' y of.! (F a)unio 1we•.Iort at.i+.F u«=__ )1 . F I !S•3 l7 .g2$ iiI IC �{, i wV,^6..Ma Ins21 °.:J �f'. y • it qilli i f kilt/l .ii i 4I. ttl If r pilir effq !� ii tli;IPli aliii.. l All : PPzst# ' �.'• n! ill-;s i Pt' II 4' `Ij �I G» !�'1111113 7SR�S a %i ! L '�IT!I III 1T111-111 1 117E lal l i0li � it -'k• — : ,— x ; 9 $ e g" 'e i • it ' I. fII r f-f-, h}f f-f-I Iqtl- I f I f o - f _ _ 1�. 1 1 .. — A F�, .aa•r,r.r sr�r.c r� � 11, I lilifily- fi � 111I �fflf =- ' ' I 1 a ; M 1111'11111 •, - 1r ,,,,...",,,;.,,,tr, 1 [ P fl • , , ,k,A, r, ----[ ',; r �4, L 1 ,.t „ , , , .. ,., v:. .,„ 1 S Ill y}r *.-!.1 l ^ • I 4 =1 • 1 j �o // liII , '' I -- / L a!i tti 411 : I,. 1k,' 1 41 —I I !. — = i I #i1 1• 1 ! aC ` --! i. I F•11 ° i it ! a}j 4 11 . 1 -''';---ri. 414;1.-'7'..• 1 - —I' •I d 1 f i, E`� 1 il IS 1 :: 413'1: S Ewa ° ` i +,i • • . .. ... .. x: R/ 1� ill :,a Y ----i ,,, t"Y s e jl g 1k.41 .3 II, �1,;. t 1i t F e F = � E �j ? �r Ei • } ,�' � ri 1 E p� Rk �7r •• . �f eA RF atop_cast , c ),I 1 as ! f 3� Y 3 �.u.ns ._ nab, .ay ..>a„tia `®® i �� �" �Ai. t.c, rztAt ie ':E 1pgt$15:6: g5}e (...., G:\ORD\ZONING1480.145 Page 7 �bbi r r yew a�� r - aFOrr a e°ytY Ooil'L '11Y0:71r0 ,QQO-ai rZ ,'ON itr0 t 10 1 133HS efe4..i_45«"o•A :,'': z'r„s;u,;,�� ax 1 t .. - .. - .. r^I r 601�1t oiil'IIArN :03SIAM 1' : drN AlIN101A / , rP 57C 1L .+7ad ,vl �dGavo,?a 'tr%31'"00 1NYYaY1'3xvlmino '66o'ON lOYalaar'A3Aa0S Aa07NYd3ad NYId -_' '�""'r.+d.aas - - '` LNblNx IWO 3Hl 9 '1'0.1'a!' ZI Dow '♦OZ-oat 31MMOA'tY%31 LLOf_ t:ack"q;c-IriLryq '� 3•� - [na -..�: e.,arn GS�M��d - ._ ... . S DO 1Nvvvvj 13xwimin0t' NO11100r HOonHO 11100N13N 0311Nn cRY. -e.T.•p samm �.l'/S 441 „b".Jr S•l rty '7NI'r. '.: '3 1 p O 1 ad9�l'f �d�JllN 1 two '13dvmo s,311HA1 •Y x3olo' 1101 Ol CMollYAON3H v CMOI1100Y _�„-Nj '.�d V1 L`1tNn ^!AM7 f.'♦-IPA: n ]� c.Y.ridltN�•N6.- J r .. VG57i•Hv:�YxiW NNaj' dfv3"O i ; lr.'f.2fY=ar ,w.ytl; `r.o1 r ... ¢I'LA14AM f NVId 311S - 1NY017ddr tr3NN0 3 0 0. 3HeN 4041 s s l6 �> rvl xA s� • Z� � �• I i (A+.�•a's.1.rP -:dYX✓7HPi 1l7llr'i1M� FJN1a91tM iMli� j - / t.�. : ,*`.-, ..^HrrL 'P -sw v ..__ ... 1 O. d9� _ .._- ' � dw vans r•.• � ! ='� c a �'\ IGS''r-dfo 17cMj- - 4'�.iH7$'1 i 7 ,Iv'I� r• .. _ _ O__.. ?Nc'pl c3VlydaAy - 'bl"I6L.H1y0?? . -. -_ .. _ •- c - �K YA -. _. .•=-v:S 7YI>tu'7L d3aivAdNoh %� YfdV9°�t O E : Aix 108NA6 . 9S1 11�YN'sd / ii _ - de t+f>rasni7 j c ..,Ot� r�nrai pedA5YE11'a s 9 1 a V 9 Lb y r i>v rL w.VA _':ar:.v :ned a NYSd 3112 `) d M� ? _ x +•r'S>Y,ojai G '13mHTW v 401& -A MY 'lt;..�.,� 4 � fwll! .; _ i9v7v' IG-v7 .'f �1.. t_ Ir.5-V G6 l-t•71 j � f -- M91 .G•.a•K 5'-'v�.-1pY777: iflrL .(dN+v7 J+.1/eUdW H171M7 dLC/J•V. S, I ------ -:-_ __ _.�•r=. --fit u �'•x� �•%� SOJIYA N7d'dnG- 1NYN0=:ANYNNf14 i r i �_ "f b 'OL'_- orl94bG-xu•lo. 3 r&u!, ''M, %YI ut� CJOHa LZLr F„e..FF?� F �-• u: aFY _ ��L.,,)..t1 '7 c!! 1dC np 4�d71N 3L1'V 1'14j I ii . N I , i f ,6e-4ol : rr. •1 �' \ f, •w-•�.a- - - - - b i. L- I `% ;� 57, Z 7 1 - � --- I ._J ♦• uw,.0 -�•- __ --'� -=�_ -r - '- � - / 3 `� �-1:trE y-t- :� �G sLSO'ti-0.. •--+-- Cast >OU .li X: L1S•:.G'L)3d 1 •CO •CL, ocN.' s r �i - -_ I i j i �� -_ - >;.... a,. _ I Kv N"UJ, 1. �.,. ' j •�^.a% .c 7nt 8.- 3-•LtiV-LW 'r beta fA1I �L '9W �_ - r _- - ., f � ,�, I � I r ' � � • j I i � � }: % � �__ __-- _ ._ a I. af. b9fu� � .79VL VW Lot a I I { ...rn �s,:ar.� fa-,,? •�. w MJOi v3 J,p c4510 Y � 1 LSE v hr1. � M r �i- - -- -- •--- T= ._--�-- .- _ sf1 t r----.-....._ I --- __r9 ;nowo{��7 Vl w1.J:i5IrL �3wZtl461G aF;i� v� 3n� ,��r ^�j+��;.,q�r $. r In..• ._ -... JIOI1r11YOlN1: A7AtlOi �j j I y ��wry swf Pivj{ 4sl yl s i ('--• I _ j ® 'Vol Vol 101.- �, ^ L 5AAs1Ct a[� 1V1. 101 :d,G�1Nd','rrjlN,MN'Itd71Y911f'1�I- ` 'c-• .., m ri '?i 1, i. • co�yay ._-,- +•fs .{s;' P: ?- -, .L 57 d v/`'- Alt •a7' -411 _ 7; 9:Awz 1 ro� ^af ilo __- _ L r. f 1 1 \�; "- 1- < cfi: -i - �-".�'r'H.sxaa- ._ .. I :; l--i I �.: V : l• ♦.-: Aensa+7-�-1 I � :. �: «� 7 f c�,d i•n r:'Y ♦7 Via- � f� 7, < y2_ 'L x.vu3 951�1 51DAW < D � 1'A'tnt, ..•, y� a:4»� n,.m. vu �*�cs:--.�-ry f ' '�,;K• � w �-s .. w - : >naro � �t � iie .. . _ %F r PyTz -e•s - e.d• L ik A1N3doad SN30rrDV; dY,w iruavd tj .:. � 11 I I I roc la4 1•►e4 - - i is i .. "-•s_ - ;�� kj-!_ - ,[L •;':^rlN.NrNxO'1-•Avric aN c oN10llne 1rM01rio00i M3N a a;lb. lON: m r -f a w rA - nH1t Cd insedw..-Rrll 3 N Imo' tf' iM '• . i �• 1 a __ - _ ..ae � '" .:��Ni:enw, �♦e.+aa _. K D - i �_ ffxyt n1sV7YVa0 a►N ,y -+•w• �. � aLF• y ��i i r _ c � }-i - ---�_ i - law F LJ .■�a - .wr,., I* n _g ? ,iaNxrNx� sN `-,.'a+,r-•-.. , _ . iEe�FaaL- Y _. --� Y _,u�cva VT�_�I'"W�?.;► ,L1�to}1 - / � -C �_.�,_-` i �-� �� caw., AaeHwar�KM>r.,< Arri>rl- - ` _ 1.+v✓ri \ '. l �' ? I IN 'a ��ak Nar7d-.tikes za►'1:i3 ter` z}- •�_ ,'', `4 . aw i�. - �a3<"1+r1�Z;1-..�-.S3Z•:.eate +rl�`\ �'c� - / - y i7 .. i id•11n0"� 571➢.'n7_ V�tt'7Y1-s4,LF 47 �1= J -ar - •'a� \�+� kv? ~ N 1-.. - av bpL °GLY c5fw'as. - . G LGb'iLl, +U7 ': c!sj J ♦ I _ Sim ; ��e \ t,.r 'c - -.� sz - ■_ .1 .. :3*VM3A00-1011r101 a .Ol:.:u.y%.9:-:8 Ji �a�o : 4�M dl,✓>dy sGLw"IL-y�%�I-.:F 77Y d.ati( iel1N%--F3�✓$eTi: `� F+>.6+YN-Uv.,flsa' .:a;L \ i Y?F F c :. �71YOSOXV1 V011137.N1 4vvmo- Aorl mns i ''�.e 4O i ^v:0y �' \ . \'•'C1AN 4r- �� - ' 'e _ � �+. Ya;yy • Fin.sj m - - _ li- JT16H711 .. - �- ....♦+- �' �I \ ^j mL,;s;xs. - O` \ r • \ 4 • rt d.Hod1R?L. {u■. ).aiowN,Nv;av,ravYas lx■.+-•. / E ip .� ; s1.v� :..•>v+rsi F-/z>�;?: caE davlra�d v,l.�!wJ 1' !• 1- r' lao'�rvs�aJcl - �y D v3yv V r,-violC n+n1 m ` la ari F5L'61 .�YQ w■',�d so•..t'+,�,J +�rcn - luoeya7 0` ? LII,1f01ds F -eH varq"w_,g. :1>1x� - .�'•c _...____.. ?^Pr -�w3: Taa n <.-w•uH 1� 'r{ .. ..�� c� -8ebi V9GwlMi .x�ti,7'I :+Sre7 hatN1� j I'�•` d � M _.d.,,a - � - - z � � y _ ._ .:.--_C>•LI 3.Ty?'TA17.•T61&W - 91i i >r•'Lt I- �` - ., yAt7v ZE1. :5:WLW-1i7V -0N .r�'7iaL2N/-Z .. h?S:rH7�;4rs'�'Vi L� tir •_ - is+C.lyi'R9)3?V7p1.43if--:>3vvu.�ibp' SnA1a;. I ' - i�'a, 71ard�tWfGf7llar?d.:Nnk117lA.sy.f%f!dxv?-- .. 1.66.9':95 iT.'V1: - plactj - _ ` - - s7 rlvvidl._avvV 15! Y GrrYd u^aig aYYNO .KYYo111M win311s,: -[N9J. Sri3i110�- 7y:N1L�Olfi - : frrti 3A17w•E-.■L::.`- 1 . .. .-f�ll �%+1��1. .�:.�i'�II'I � >%'�• dt ti3Ol.... r . �a'.tvv+�' �?xla'�!,ri*1S-..�?♦+a�v--_617V51f._ 96618 0 HdV Lp I - 1=3 a do 1=3�� :SIM" swu Islow" •..... ......... ... .................................. 31 / H,,,4 sN Us "verMs" ---'t&-odr - 3xmuz FL: -1bam"O 4AW WOW . -, smma*"34, --a% 1104M : We 2 As WXXA ' VO LOWNW.03XVINLIM * 650 *00 A*VVL*SV * AXAVnG I L"w lax -A-* 3"L I o-wra-vesew • tog -on SaffloA."Xu t ILWwvjL * 2awnum" 1 nowasy moans* Latoouzd anion I IMLINA-TWJ015 'I= 01 9001111A0MISS 2-MIANOW 13 Ll aave"v *duh V-S .2"QuM Wpwv" 4L law~ 42LVW ->MW .0 AAl. ",'R V 4011A 5PS-i ova V~ nanvvpa iM SexaLico"Wr. .44"M sM"*AL 'V4*VM - { - .... _. _. ... -ivwtn t I III N *NWXA07TlW%P L-1 I - - - - - - - - - - - - IAN" -SO- Lq a MMG "%flu �Wjmp to emw rw wwwv"'d MW ff .,v IV -;A I pAlvAtV *;w City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-034 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-278 / 2nd Reading / Zoning Change / Tract 2A3, Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No, 72 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as approximately 12.573 acres situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey,Abstract No. 72, and being Tract 2A3. LOCATION: East side of North Peytonville Avenue at the intersection of Plantation Drive and North Peytonville Avenue. OWNER: Ruby L. Hill APPLICANT: Kingdom Park Developments, L.L.C. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen (13) RESPONSES: Four(4) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Mike Dumont, 598 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "We are concerned about the tree removal ordinance--loss of trees? Set back requirements. Coventry Manor just put a home in our backyard. They raised the grade about 3 feet." (Received 5/6/98) • James and Catherine Lancaster, 600 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor of. See attached letter. "As a result of the developer's cooperation, we support the zoning change and preliminary plat applications." (Received 5/7/98) • Dale Clark (Southlake-Coventry, Ltd.), 16250 Dallas North Parkway, Dallas, Texas, undecided. See attached letter. Property owner has concerns with drainage and sewer services, and that the development name is too similar to Coventry (Nor Manor. (Received 5/7/98) City of Southlake,Texas • Russell and Lana Holley, 692 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, undecided. "I want more info on who and what is going to go in behind our property. I need a set back." (Received 5/7/98) One (1) response was received outside the 200' notification area: • Janine and Jim Liakos, 1501 New Castle Road, Southlake, Texas, opposed. Property owner has concerns with traffic problems. See attached letter. (Received 5/5/98) P&Z ACTION: May 7, 1998; Approved (5-0). COUNCIL ACTION: May 19, 1998; Approved (7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-034Z.WPD 17D- '. • May 6, 1998 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake,TX 76092 Reference No. ZA 98-034, 035 &036 (copy attached) On behalf of James and Catherine Lancaster at 600 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas 76092; as a result of the developer's cooperation, we support the zoning change and preliminary plat applications. This is based on conversations that the lots immediately to the west of 600 Garden Court will be deed restricted with a 100' build set back line — additionally, two of the lots already have building plans showing approximately 150' feet to the back of the proposed residence. The goal is to maximize separation and privacy. Backyard set backs, especially on one (1) acre zoning, are critical and should be heavily considered in the review process. Thank you for your attention.• L dest regards, 4"1.0„ J es and Catheri . ter E closure RED'D MAY 0 71998 lb - 3 MAY-06-1998 14:53 FROM WARREN CLARK DEUWDCH TO 18174889370 P.002 The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission.667 North Carroll Avenue,Southlake,Texas,76092. REFERENCE NO.: Zp 98-034 r 033' -- 0361 (460., I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: S RECV MAY 0 71998 Sl NATURE: I 4 Wh C'%3R�[ beAr-• (Please Print Name) CL 1K 'RFt 101 d ADDRESS: 14250 �LOS �• PK4tWtj Southlake-Coventry Ltd. ^ 16250Dallas N Pkwy Ste 210 2� _C�1� 1 Pl IONE: c 0371 Dan n Tx 75248 This proposed development is directly north of Coventry Manor. We have met separately with staff and the applicant to express concerns over drainage and sewer service. Warren Clark Development strongly opposes the proposed name for this subdivision. Any use of Coventry gives prospective homeowners and all present Southlake residents the impression that this is a continuation of Coventry Manor by the same development team. We have spoken to Mr. McFarland about this and he has told us that he will come up with a new name. L TOTAL 10.002 C ITY OF SOT THLAKE NOTICE TO INTERESTED PROPERTY OWNERS REFERENCE NO.: ZA 98-034 Dear Property Owner: An application has been filed with the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission for a Zoning Chane on property legally described as approximately 12.573 acres situatedinte Thomas Beedy Survey. Abstract N . 72. and being Tract 2A3. The property is located on the east side of North Pevtonville Avenue at the intersection of_Planiation Drive and North Pevtonville Avenue. The request is being made by the Applicant, Kingdom Park Developments. L.L.C. The Owner of the property is Ruby L. Hill. The current zoning is "AG" Agricultural District. The requested zoning is "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. A public.hearing will be held by the City.of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission on Thursday_ May 7. 1998. at 7.00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 667 North Cairoll'Avenue, Southlake, Texas. At this time, you may submit your views on the matter in person, by writing, or by representative. You are encouraged to follow the requested action through final approval because changes are often made during the review process. If you know of any interested property owner who, for any reason, has not received a copy of this letter,it would be greatly appreciated if you would inform them of the time and place of this hearing. Very truly yours, Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake, Texas The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission,667 North Carroll Avenue,Southlake,Texas,76092. REFERENCE NO.: 7.A 98.034 I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: SCWOoL -TRA comic / A B P1eor3LE4Y) /AI miee s-ye E WE5T of Co✓Edgy I I 2(are -' ' A p'vN tn. GCSe. our streets --to co /77u te- a.)d i'n -/--ie f 6 t1�ly' k-R .tH i�1 5cr/o c t_ oN ye' i <��ii ct ?Y y�_/ • r�!/-7 ) , , &d�.;hon fla. vrn cc.cc.Q5 It-• o ' NecfP7-orlui'/le even — SIGNATURE: (Please Print Nate �p N//tf& ///YI 5 ADDRESS: /SO/ R"A Scuthlake-Coventry Lb1, 4,7` L A,e 7•G 9.Z- 16250 Dallas N Pkwy Ste 21 C PHONE: Q/7 9 -7<9 Z / Dallas Tx 75248 RED MAY 0 51998 172o1Q 7Lraff c will be £o/r)//5 4nroa.14, 0 5s Lle scICtoit's Lin u..! 2i b i) 7U21/2 /?0 Qc ce5 S R y10 Dd/e ii2 4 e�,v cz-/'ea. b,e. n5 c!e Ye/o/p ed ,27 do��u.,u/r y,► za a -Ott A 04 7eyXetZ° AAe 07t, flays /r_e_ ss yy a-cv. � >vaz.Q.c- 4'2it, e gjo %�-n ixt.u,�z Zia . a. I2 c a/tx- Az 0- v-i/e .h ze4, - _, . 04,t. 26, -zYie /n 62/7 . o „ice G1e. ss z --eiAltai -;1e ; z - Xt )ti g eA 927 ? a - frej, to & i-eJ• a .ez zxem,i2r, ajle,ce, 6,71, p 0A,ydee n22. go-U.21e- 44 --ab .-a-e55 filltiZe 111- -t/6° ip -6b' YZVV 44V-64 • 4 J/2zQ/ 01 /0-6,-ctik Ze.. ayit, _e/ia./276e/xx o-e-ciL . - .r2x -eJlent.iL_- do-t-ctei2 _a_ n_j-cT . L PacC . i / / /-- A\i\ \ t %tar I 1 I • • . '. . • \ ' I s i. , \ , -------:--1.------ ' \\\ \ , \\\ \\• SI OCIID 1 \\ 1 ?UkCt 1 I i I 1 ) 7\ \ , • i I EU', t_. -------. ' I 1 " !. 40.4 s A 1, - H 1 1 , , AFST rX1VE 1 1 \ I ' 1 I 1 • 1 1 LI qilr-Ii‘ 'IN I 1 1--"'\\ c 00 PiRCW4 l'ES ', \ . 1 Oarro,CATI IN P° ' J ,..,1 I eeow tsv'_ ‘.1,s .,06010, H:ofott, , ., //' i ....,. i_ .........•41 11116 _----- --->---' -- &E-3- ie. -----, I • •CE _j , 1 ! U I, U.LVP -.‘I'' VODUGe434I G• ' , I , I PkisS 1 ,1 / , .1, 1 1 - ) ; IIIII I leiT 1\ Iks11...t-1 1; I , , ! I 111 I I:- \ / I ti,Si 1 . '‘ ,,"''''• ''-. 1 ...e07- , 1 I --7 i ._ 11___€4. • _,-j • I 1 , 1 1 .-j , 11, 1 , MI/ I 1 11 1 ' ---- ------ -1 li i / /H 11111 1111/41' . 4111 I I ] 0 / _colkosit 1 iiiiikiii .,.,.,..„:„.._1,1,.... :An '4"1"010501r. *VI -CYPSESS,CREF-6-- : :- -004 \ c, I I // 1------1)! I....cangsV 1 1 1 0,0'01 \rojo. / it°W IH; Illki ,„-,.. , „-*4 I ; ' ; ; •/ ' 1 '•:/: Ilr x Ap46111kWirmk III recoklia..I i / I 1 / 1 ! I I I! ! / - ,ir 47" t AM \ `N- \ \ / / \ V\ \ 15 1 ___.! . • [ i. , 1 I r-ID—r7 TRACT MAP : DURHAM r ELSENTARY 1 _. SCHOCL 1 r -.WIZ\ E5 FiTIEZI\ I y m I u _ w a (v., ¢ I Z O w 0 10 N301:11,9 1. I 0Q ' to I O ao w } CC W rn 2 m O a .w. J o t'n O I ai a •v J -• Q I to co O Z } _W cu— CC N~ CO 2 � J Iz a AF_w p N B=C �� j cc a. + I; 0 cC V IL WI ------.C . Y �N J /... .a 17� HVt 3Q D a Q O : Q r Ij� NI V— J to V _ QO� " a UU ? MI Ia of i I } A Y CC =2 0• ' Fw [r� .. \ U) S 7 0 E R T v tt tz - U 0— Z LU Z t9 Q Z ^L. \ )- el �‘Y U Jw J O w , I_ O v w Z N : 3Nn Z • ( 0 0 Ar+ritIae U p — V Z - j WJ Q Q al ,cf, i a " I- = Q a CY } aa cc I- N w Q N 0 I— Q LL } fl 1 I O 9 W CC SC F•- N J 1•-1 I- _ CC w Ocn D ZVI. cvo�r�o�oar r.' V ^ a LION 6"lY ?�.LN3111 N ta . Ott COI - - - ',A POI • _ x it OM• taut r r. r R• .7.r• • • t.t cc 1 • r I O o) O Q) J Q J 1 - `1 I at 1 O. O ` - J I O 0 I I to ti U q ^ 9. E. s _ '^ ll = o g Q 1 1 to tv (I I, �, :n Ni • IV - • / ^ ? • Q • - a N I it N •may/\\ N I IN 1 ,, i7 / \ 1 C4 1 (11.01 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-278 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING • APPROXIMATELY 12.573 ACRES SITUATED IN THE THOMAS BEEDY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 72, AND BEING TRACT 2A3, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 1 ('J these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does fmd that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does fmd that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 2 �1 � - la • altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately 12.573 acres situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, and being Tract 2A3, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of (iime land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. (11101 G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 3 '`1 b - l l Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. (irre MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: (16••• CITY SECRETARY G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I45 Page 4 C APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I45 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" " PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Being a parcel or tract of land out of the T, Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all that certain tract or parcel of land as described by deed to Ruby L. Hill in Volume 6386, Page 973 Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the center of North Peytonville Road, (variable right-of- way) said iron rod being the southwest corner of the T. Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72 and the northwest corner of the T. M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 702 of Tarrant County, Texas. Thence North, with the center of Peytonville Road, a distance of 301.16 feet to a P. K. nail set in asphalt for a corner Thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds West, with the south line of a ten acre tract of (se land conveyed to Carle° and Regina Capili by deed recorded in Volume 11643, Page 671, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, a distance of 1871.89 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found under concrete for a corner. Thence South 00 degrees 22 minutes 00 seconds West, with the west line of Garden Addition as described in Volume 388-208, Page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, a distance of • 284.29 feet to a 3/4 inch iron rod found for a corner. Thence West, with the north line of Coventry Manor Phase Two as recorded in Volume A, Page 3320, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and Coventry Manor Phase One as recorded in Volume A, Page 2576, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas a distance of 1870.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 12.573 acres of land. C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 6 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-035 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-279/2nd Reading/Zoning Change/ Lot 1. T. Beedy No. 72 Addition STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as Lot 1, T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3584, Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas, and being approximately 9.79 acres. LOCATION: East side of North Peytonville Avenue approximately 220' north of the intersection of Plantation Drive and North Peytonville Avenue. OWNER: Lee Fahrenbrook APPLICANT: Kingdom Park Developments, L.L.C. CURRENT ZONING: "RE" Residential Estate District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Eleven (11) RESPONSES: Three (3) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • James and Catherine Lancaster, 600 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor of ye attached letter. "As a result of the developer's cooperation, we support the zoning change and preliminary plat applications." (Received 5/7/98) • Paul Sullivan, 1900 North Peytonville Avenue, Southlake, Texas, in favor of See attached letter. "I have reviewed the developer's plans and feel they meet the requirements set forth by our existing land use plan." (Received 5/7/98) • Russell and Lana Holley, 692 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, undecided. "I want more info on who and what is going in behind our property. I need a set back." (Received 5/7/98) L City of Southlake,Texas One (1)response was received outside the 200' notification area: • Dale Clark (Southlake-Coventry, Ltd.), 16250 Dallas North Parkway, Dallas, Texas, undecided. See attached letter. Property owner has concerns with drainage and sewer services,and that the development name is too similar to Coventry Manor. (Received 5/7/98) P& Z ACTION: May 7, 1998; Approved (5-0). COUNCIL ACTION: May 19, 1998; Approved (7-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-035Z.WPD 4 L L May 6, 1998 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Reference No. ZA 98-034, 035 & 036 (copy attached) On behalf of James and Catherine Lancaster at 600 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas 76092; as a result of the developer's cooperation, we support the zoning change and preliminary plat applications. This is based on conversations that the lots immediately to the west of 600 Garden Court will be deed restricted with a 100' build set back line — additionally, two of the lots already have building plans showing approximately 150' feet to the back of the proposed residence. The goal is to maximize separation and privacy. Backyard set backs, especially on one (1) acre zoning, are critical and should be heavily considered in the review process. Thank you for your attention. dest regards, 11111 dip J. es and Catheri - . ter E closure REC'D MAY 0 71998 '7F3 PA UL SULLIVAN 1900 North Peytonville Southlake, TX 76092 May 7, 1998 To; Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, City of Southlake. My name is Paul Sullivan and I own the property at 1900 N. Peytonville which is across the street from the proposed Coventry Park Addition. I am out of town on business and am unable to attend tonight's meeting. I am writing this letter to voice my support for the subdivision. I have reviewed the developers plans and feel they meet the requirements set forth by our existing land use plan. The proposal allows for the preservation of most of the existing trees on the land and will be a nice addition to our neighborhood. The developer has carefully selected builders who have a reputation for building quality homes in Southlake, this will allow us to maintain the quality of homes in our neighborhood. I feel that in order to maintain the salty of our street we need to have a three-way stop installed L., at the entrance to the subdivision.. This will slow traffic and allow a safe place for children to cross the street. Since Paul Sullivan 1900 N. Peytonville RECD MAY 0 71998 L 7E t Y-06-1998 14:53 FROM WARREN CLARK DEV'DCH TO 18174889370 P.002 The fullowing form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission,667 North Carroll Avenue,Southlake,Texas,76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 93-034 03 r —• O34 I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecided about) the request fur the following reasons: SIZZ 1998 SIUNATURE: �j Woekt7VV (Please Print Name) cLiagt< 5� ` 0oLi-c4 ADDRESS: I`Q 5O bAulas /`t • Owl Sovtntake-Coventry Ltd. 16250 Dabs N Pkwy Ste 210 PHONE: 7-Zr 7! Dams Tx 75248 This proposed development is directly north of Coventry Manor. We have met separately with staff and the applicant to express concerns over drainage and sewer service. Warren Clark Development strongly opposes the proposed name for this subdivision. Any use of Coventry gives prospective homeowners and all present Southlake residents the impression that this is a continuation of Coventry Manor by the same development team. We have spoken to Mr. McFarland about this and he has told us that he will come up with a new name. • .r L TOTAL P.002 1 au ,, .., H 44 m 10 N30dd0 • r \Z-4 L -.,cic (r, . •_ . f — iii } CC 111 I- o -.1 am Ro CC N J o RI Ilr . QQ • a O Q CD 0 ZN W �, U •u • < = C7 ti —5 ¢ 15 a 8 ? A n 8rr _ • _ I 1 N M r. RI I I Kr --------C--\ r lk -`lam• ^ .., III > a V ��a Q A inL,CZ1 Li e 'l1 t`T �I °.I q I1..... Y d q R el NI 10(, NI a fl) G 14 1N[� CI Ill Cr \ l0 0- N FL7., ... R / 3— NI v s � \--... it R V/Inisz W — .''''killilltliP...3::;(1—-, CD n cc ri V� I� � ; F- Q QQ N 'I v 1 \ • i NI _ ZZ CC rn.r. C\ (.nZ 41 Si o N cr . U ) iT1JI7 .,-, i--- -1 • CC-co N r N U } .--1Q O 1— 5 f- N ... 1-1I-• Q ..r VI MI Z cvor3snoa/ � 8 WONVJY AWI.LN3711 K. N IIO..r 00 • • g Jal I ♦�I NI .. t Z . a.I• .0 M I( F• I a OI O. Q ~WQ oU J 33a 1 1 co I Init Ta q ..-Io O cs I' I 41 RI cV I. • (!) ap 0 N M O n O I ' c Li C•/�] = a� S e N 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-279 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LOT 1, T. BEEDY NO. 72 ADDITION AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 9.79 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "RE" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT TO "SF-lA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance an map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "RE" Residential Estate District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 1 (7 r 1 C these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake,,Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has lso found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be G:\ORD\ZON ING\480.145 Page 2 �/L altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Lot 1, T. Beedy No. 72 Addition and being approximately 9.79 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "RE" Residential Estate District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any ofthe provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that (6.0' a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:\O R D\ZONING\480.145 Page 3 E — 10 Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY { PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 4 F7E - II C APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C C G:1O R D\ZO N I NG\480.145 Page 5 thipe EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3584, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 9.79 acres. co? • ,t L G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 6 r7 - ) City of Southlake,Texas Cirr' STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-042 PROJECT: Revised Site Plan /Dynamic Travel STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Site Plan for Dynamic Travel on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Perry/Allen Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3382, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 0.7688 acres. LOCATION: South side of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), being approximately 500' east of South Kimball Avenue. OWNER/APPLICANT: COZ, L.L.C. CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Eight (8) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Gary Price (Liberty Bank), 2438 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor of. (Received 5/15/98) P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Approved(4-2) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, May 15, 1998. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, with the exception of those in Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 29, 1998. Note that the sole purpose of this application is to add a 240 s.f. accessory building to store lawn maintenance equipment and office records per Section 34.1 (c). L:\COMDEV,WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-042SP.WPD nF - 1 • ....(hope 1R3 . / ,�yP ® TR TR 3$ TRACT 10 r 1)" V. .37 3B3A .62 AC W 1,ri TRACT 1 B 02o Z TR 3F ' ` 3 0 �"o . 1 o V.1589 ® a CAVALLINO PROPERTIES LTD. REEMAr 3F2 TR3F1 TR 382 F vEY .144 0 1.477 AC co TRACT 1 E 5' SU R GJ 3.726 0 253�� A'52 205 0 „C_3" TR 6A1 .151 3; i . LIBERTY a a . 'deo'II:0Z12 BANK n ITRACT 1 B 1 TRACT 1 A 2.993./// AC �' • w�M��w�f� _ ��- —M f ..l,.ffT M�-M TR2� 7 � TR 2C1 TR 2C TR "C-2" GRAPEVINF ■ .016 0 12is. STATE )�g .66 AC ih� zys . OFT TR CAAS TR 28 SOUTHLAKE.;� .452®e Spurg • , .7479 AC KIMBALL �� 1A I VENTURE 0 ^ "C_2" I 47 2g2e BL C40, (� TR 2f.3A1 iG .ri — , , r .031 Awe— r "C 3" 6. k°�� s 0114 „C_2., , . c , 0 3 c �o9, � G LU TR 2A2 F. CANGELOSI i '05% 2.53 AC I . Z AG" o o 161 TR 2 " Z 3 AC 0 1.59 AC Z 0 ss TR 2A 5.73 AC 0cc I Zw O w 3 w O H. CARR V TR 2A2A 2T94 2A LU 0 6.79 AC TR 'A3A 0 CD �R 1 1 1.189 AC 1 t (1•0„ 1 I 1 TR 5.93 i ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING IC99—T81' (L38) L96T—St'9 (LT8) 2609G SVX3.L '33IV1HJd10S T209L SVX31, '02I0.3Q3H AVANIIVd AN '2 fi8E2 0%111U100O 1// to IN YI . '7YhhIW'10N/0 1110 2111 01 NOW00• GOft N 'N'! AQVHS mint 3M02IOS00 S3YIVf Nr T1.NNI7 1.Y71N7O 7Yr1111110Y 11111 Ft- :„,,: SNOIS3Q 'IaAV2I.L OIWVNAG tlYO�N77r T2A.Y0OOIN•A0 VOA 01, M/MIA UV A3N3IH '3 )VITIIAI ,LNVOI'IddV /2I3Nato , ON {b TA ON 21101 CO O, xF 07 'IEE-3:IN 4 II CO \ � Y:.. ':4 PI U 7,• b� ,1 g T1PYN10 .. r LL ,jl F• k n _ u $ b C 7 .•; 9F o =a A. o r 5;s E iF Ii� b •• al _ .I I; j1 - t, CA L , fl °" \- , ill: ',7 / r ---- t 1,, t�1 I h li sit Q _. / / / '4.ii i .4,1 .,,;/ i' , 7 1------,'.r.,, el 4,714 i le 1 ' 7 ,' Lii • -``-... t ''',144,.. . ..1 '.--. 11 i *f i I 41 I'; lei g! 1 -- T 1. 15 ee EE • E, I, -O . ila/I u i jjjIII 1( I - I 11;11111! �� sr Ehtlil II 1,1 so I. P 1! 5; It�' 7s •1 j 011 is IIi „,,INN,tt,,S L961-9,9 (L19) i£99-T9t (Lie) •r IMAM.•.r..PI IZ09L Z609L SVX3.L 'NV'IH.Lf10S �.,."..''":: SVX3,L 'a i0,da3a AVAfN2iVd AN '3 6S£Z 7417:-"4"."”"LIVO a r LO�i# 'N'I AQVHS i'B£t 'I3AV2LL OIIQVNAQ w •��'""" SNDIS3a 3A021DS00 S3P(VP """"'"'"--"'"' A3)IOIH '3 P(VITIIM INVOIZddV/2IZNA10 OVIS6 ON 1OVJ Y� (0 . C g Q) O K c' s . o. i } . a it i _ g. p Z� s d W A-.. .- ; is .11:1,1!.,1,11.,..!:11101,111111,111ifilli 1 Rillilli .0-.0t 11111.• -il!I' Z 1111.01, `' '',Pl.d d$: ft w I II a ^ II::W I;' -:.: vQ/ ri /r 00010 1 y ti� ill9 ti ALMS > + b .0-0 0 „s :',,, CC u: , .„-, a a. w r,,, A-.z I''' :',I;i;I Q Z b iil �° E., $ e d i;b,l; _• _ , 9S A 'iiiii b Z ' A6.W3 W CC 111 111 .. . .. . .... ..... . ...____ _, C L 1F_3 „,w,,,,,,,,,,,,,, L96I-9179 (L L t9) T£99-19i' ( T9) ^■..p.m..WNW WM T Z09L 26094. SVX3,L '3J Y'IHJ,110S .w=N SVX3.L 'axo,Laaa AVMMUIdd IN '3 ts£z i o. WO No Pm--� LOi�T# 'NZ AUYHS 1,9£1 'I3AV2i.L OIY(VN.ta q -..,....�,.- SNOIS3a 3A02IOSOO S3I4Vf '”" ••" ' A3�OIH '3 I�VITIIM ,LNVOPIddV/2I3NA0 (D .210$ ON NMI rn co o: >-cr . I A-•O b o f- N A-a DE D DD 1D le Z Q "t= CL LU n 1— Le ' . 0 b Q sb W e > b Z H d 0 Q b 1 b Q OE.0 a 1i r 0 w i b ^ g 2Q t LL F e m e / ; n �r Ii : 1 A •So t r c, o. a-T R 0 r(F- City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 98-042 Review No: Two . Date of Review: 5/29/98 Project Name: Revised Site Plan - Dynamic Travel. Lot 1. Block 1. Perry-Allen Addition APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Coz. LLC William E. Hickey Designs 2325 E. Southlake Boulevard 1384 Shady Lane# 1407 Southlake. Texas 76092 Bedford. Texas 76021 Phone : (817)481-8631 Phone : (817) 545-1967 Fax : (817)488-6291 Attn: James Cosgrove Fax : (817)496-0951 Attn: Bill Hickey CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 880. 1. Label the zoning on the adjacent east property as ""C-2". 2. Remove the accessory building shown near the primary structure and identify how this area will be used. (parking,landscaping, etc.)Recalculate open space and site coverage if there will be a net loss of landscaping or open space. 3. Show, label,and correctly dimension easements on or adjacent to the site. Specifically, address the following: a. The existing plats for Lot 1R1, Block 1 Georgetown Park and Lot 1, Block 2 Perry/Allen Addition show a 10'U.E. along the west line of Lot 1R1 (Georgetown Park) and a 5'U.E. along the east line of Lot 1 (Perry/Allen). b. Show and label the D&U.E. for the 21 inch storm drain pipe in the northwest corner of the property crossing to the adjacent west property. Provide an easement for this feature if one is not currently in place. * No horizontal or vertical articulation is required on the proposed accessory building. No wall lengths exceed 3 times the wall height. * It appears that this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. , * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Coz,LLC VIA FAX ABOVE William E. Hickey Designs VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98042SP2.WPD C '1F- 1 r TE99—TO (Lt9) L96T-StS (Li9) 86094 S1aQ,L •aMTULL(lOS ..-.-. TZ09L SYXaL '(MOaIQ�H 'QA'IH axruilIlOS '3 9Z£8 .�,,,,,,a •, 1 aA ci, WO LO'T I •'N'I AQYHS t9£T 3AOHI0S00 saiwr +•os� 11111191 su V- SNOIS3Q 0TI 'ZOO alin'w,.°rwr'�a''T,'VDWY and a a ,14VI0II1 'a I YTTIIA ,LNVOr1ddY Alamo s,.-...:. o x ‘ttiki it1 �c 14 k id 3 a (fir s u b1 i Ski E l a ilb 03 1/7 1 i11111 , ;I`Ii § Iz � I = 1 • . / h ji- i I i• • .`�NGi+cL`y�i r .!w\mil\\ % y k . %r1r�,\`�,-•i, '41141, '--I- '4;14 ' — ---fir. 1/4 A...,%4P ', /,0[1 ' , • p -......., -,.._ 4, ,,i AL.k E (.../ . ,..u.: ......... ,..„, ,, ,,, .... ..........6 -, ,.14:,-A,...\ , •air ; '���D t� \` r rI f C • hl r i /k , { e i, j„„te —i , / �. ,ly`,„1��'". : , .ei di I I' . 1*... 441111ari''''''''''. _i lii : 1 t -1 -.0 j f-i i. e �i' ` ' `4,,4 .ham , .1�61t1w . . ', ' ,. rral 11 de -tI 11 • A C �7ar pF i a , , 1l �` O J r k 'a I,i , tp101171� f � i 1711111 '4101: 11 D�Allll a�lll4111 1 4 Ami11I 1111 i 11:1111! hi0111 ���9'11 RSV 1110 !I1_! pro _ yk `.w • iii . I 111 co,. \,,, 0 "-- 11R111 IV- 8 I L96T-91+9 (LT9) 1E99-19* (LT9) poomoter...+ TZO9L Z6O9. S o NI'' ."I".� .ui„ PIXEL 'QnI0.I0 IH QA'IH H3IV'IHJ.[1MIMI O 0 9ZEZ "" +Mt.r•.nt...,t LOtl# •'ICI AO:YHS i'9ET -g" .0a.......rw,w. HAOH0S0O S91IYf "w " � SI .r+,a .Mi ' 371 'ZOO(.0, ' 4�I3Im TII IIQIItH J.NY3PIdr3IV2I3NAo co 0, rn r.- ea >- a a M • oa. 1H 1 , rii ‘ ,..________,- • • Vi-: .9 /F44111 2 i t111111 t C , , .N.i-A, r ../t t—.. ( ., , . ,,,,,,,,,,ii„,,:,:,, .:::,,,, ,, ,:,.„,::, z 0, , z .,,.,,,:.. : ,,., d 6 0 !;,,,,,,. 5 ,, . . ..,H,,, 5 ; ,,,,,,.,_„. ; 5 a w w cal '0.4:::',''''''''''",'!'::'',',', u 1 _ i i,i:',':,.,,, .;,,:,:,:,',',:l'o, N . „..;,;.,,,,,,;,„:;,,,,;,,,,,,„,,,,,, :. „,,,:„,,:,.,, ,,, ,,„,.,., _ .: ../r t-.ot I d t -.. .Wt t-.ot .-a City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-043 PROJECT: Resolution No. 98-49 /Specific Use Permit/ Wal-Mart- outside storage of plants or other greenery STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Specific Use Permit for outside storage of plants or other greenery as part of a retail operation per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 45.1 (29) on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Farrar Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1975, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 23.003 acres. LOCATION: South of State Highway 114, north of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), and west of North Kimball Avenue. OWNER/APPLICANT: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District (lkimre LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: * Ten (10) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Sandra Erwin, 13530 Inwood Road Dallas, Texas, in favor of. "Logical business growth and good for the general business in the area." (Received 5/14/98) P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Denied (6-0). STAFF COMMENTS: Due to the limited scope of this request and the fact that no changes have been made to the previously approved concept/site plan, no new review letter was generated. Attached is a concept plan indicating the area of the proposed outdoor storage and display. In granting a specific use permit for this activity, the City Council is authorized to set out specialized buffering, screening, design and signage requirements to ensure that the outdoor storage, display and sale is totally compatible with the specific site and all surrounding land uses. Note that this application requests to exceed the allowed area of outdoor 1111.0) sales permitted in Section 38.3(a) of the ordinance. This provision states that businesses may "display for sale merchandise items traditionally marketed through outside storage not to exceed five(5) percent of the floor `I6-- I City of Southlake,Texas area of the business." Wal-Mart is currently utilizing the allowed 5% (6,500 (re s.f.)of building floor area(130,000 s.f.) which includes the existing open air garden area enclosed by the wrought iron fence (3,729 s.f.) and the screened area in the parking lot (2,771 s.f.). The SUP permit request before you is for an additional 7,000 square feet which reflects an additional 5.38% of building floor area. Much of the area intended for approval with this SUP request is currently being used for outdoor sales. Also be aware of the following "C-3" district permitted use: "Nursery buildings for the retail sale of plants and accessory items where the sales operations are conducted entirely within an enclosed structure. Outdoor storage or sale shall be permitted with this use to the extent that the outdoor sales area is completely enclosed by a fence, wall or screening device." L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-043SU.WPD L ... Lilim Ittell IP WPM - 1 / \ op, / 11 i Alas —..NE,,, rilia Mr 111111111111111111111 WM! \ -. trialloritiC ,111 1 L :2 I I Iiii _ _rap '• - 111bV 'Min 1 i- CE;Ns --7 eillilliltr11111111 / 4 NBC 11111111 NMI .1,51 berm ' 1 reird!No P14111111111hi-o.:75c- ail , PAN •;41.,.,16.71 :A./ .. L Niv, : _atsok 13 — 's Ai. ii 1 1 i re.'7' IIMIlifigrilitril& '' --) \ 'r rm. WITai/la • :*: •,-.e.,-.1mtj Imml 111 r t NCP" illI 1 '# .111111110.1 Alms..-asifilmas • 7 1111111011111111111111 r 11111 1 SAVEgallingliraltillii H 11:1541 K 6". 7 1 \774" itt illaifflo . , , „...,_... :,:.,..,. . I. ImiShidift ,., *ffluvreir4 sillin_____ \ 110-11 1#01111111' ,, . esiokelA "stagEsillial , - Almsalmr---- -1-- ---.blEillilL I gala L wArg*IIIIIIIFI ,,....-r. •- rdi4,"aka -erm swak.,A•.........." . pzii. wpm plipliz-Nel TRACT MAP i iiiiin miti.higAntillir \ , I AM . A A /�' QS73 1.6 AC 1 lot. • • 1n T R TR ?R2(kW' • .n41 1.ee TR 6A .38 e' „ • TR 3C E NORTHWEST PKWy (STATE HWY 0011P.-- T&M SOUTHLAKE '' DEV. CO. o /0L • TR �� SOUTHLAKE ;55 "C-3" 1 SHOPPING VILLAGE N 6 • IRi • _ 1.4311c (i. 1?\;00 i L. ? MCDONALD'S • 44,64/15 .. ' "C-3" 34 T&M SOUTHLAKE SOUTHLAK� :V. CO.- . 4 0 3 � Z VIOLLAGE "C-3" t JK, �j ' V. STAGLIANO �DI, A j A66gJ 23.003 • �60�' 102 o z TF 4K 1 Ir 717 7F3 Z If, ,» CITY OF ° . t o �- '1 •J SOUTHLAKE . TR 3F2 TR3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- I ?C .144 STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS: STATE OF TEXAS • —� TR ,e .zos o DALLAS FOAM ( � �i 05130 q TR• 151 /1 " 3 g " INC. ` . CS as <4` ��• "B-1 " S. ERWIN S.ERWIN L__—/TR20 T TR 182B S. ERWIN B .o• 3A CHURCH OF CHRIST. TR "B-1 " _ .747 L. GREENWAY INVESTMENT CO. 1A ADJACENT OWNERS �G • AND ZONING - NIAI� �t �/ TR 18 10� TR 162 l 6.—'1 10.26 AC 11.219 0 P I LW CO CI OD e--- .. is—. GN2 / ' 'e , -•- • . .,, _- - -- CI..• t 1 '• ——-rt inc"" • ' I I •.1 • wol .° ....„ ..•--• ; I; _.k,;!;•2_..)2-E.e.r.l.._. . i ,.,. 1 1 6 -- ._— _ , , ...\. , , I „ _ ,..,,1:' .22..5-'•—A --- .\,_ -- . • s% . ! ...!,.:- •ti - -*- .rt •-- \ i : ..__ _ :.4 l N I -t— -T-1): I'. ,1 I r. I.-. - A - ro- ,.. .,:,. ,\ ,,, , . . ,, ...„:, • 4 ..Ej.i , ,,•,„:: .. • ,-.1„,;..E,..........„• :,, ,,.,. 1 ,.1„ ,,\ , 149, i ,-. 1 , % ii ( .. ii a (.ii‘ ,, u • ..... 1, ,i. (, . i I, I !, 1411 1, ,.. -, ii ,.,. , ,., ,,, , : :- . , ;7 - ii 710 N " lit, il i ji t li 0 0 til i , i I . .: I I i" I ii ifI f: T 1 %) • .1 ,,. 4 • .: tr• , k i'. ' ••43' k' I ; 1 I j! .--, r I . ri it i i 11, 1 • -'•.•'. - I ;11„, . •tr i 1 I .... 'It'. II i 1 ; • - ' - - ' I - • - II 1 - - ,,:- 4 W•• v. ;1 ) ij t I ; t t I t,s ,,.. i. , . ; ...,. 1 . -4. h , 7, i i ''• i 1 e li 1 . t! ! { • '. ' , -• '. Pi -- , T I., ., ... frl • - . ', • - ' lin-- - I, i ..,, :N , T. PIP I • , ., 1 , 1 k ',,11, :. (.... :: ii, - .. . es , •, _ t , , , 1. • , ! , • : • •• _ t•; ,;.-: 1 1. ., _ ..- , ,.. , 11 -. I Le ,i : 1.4 ____:, ...1 'I i 1 :c, .- .,- '' " ,. •: iii, .. 4'1 _..,- •sf 4 .1 • • :Hr. I— , .. •• • , .•• .— _ . .Ir.,.• ,,:i 4 , • . lie ••'''-''' , i ', l' l'il I f..,.., I " $ ... .1.11 .s. 1 • 1 /1• I "- •tek,i,„,:,, 1,,,,ta, --\\.---:.:,,,,:,:s. •,.... v.:. * v.,.. .:)•• -'• 1 i • 1 I 5 i 1 4. ,:i I , ;:s: 11 i Il 14 : 1.yLl 7 iri , ‘...\ • , .. \ :......, .. , .• (.,;:....,.:,,, 4 ,,, \ 1"I I. 1141 1 1 t , 5 IC ‘‘ \• s•• ..' \‘ e \‘' \, , , . Ii v i WO ny! . it\\ 1.:r-.' ‘.1 lit . ,Ig \ pi\•-•- • ,- ,,-.\ ••\;‘,s, 1 bi, , ii IF. . . ... , \ • \\\ it \\ ., ‘, \ \ ,‘, •:\ \„ i '..i i If, !fli .:0 ••.'•'• 7 'f ' \-- II I I '.. ' '• i'! t•t: :' : ‘.'•'. \ \ .; ....", 4 I l'• .1. '7 \ \,\'''\ • \ - ''' \\ ''s \\\'\ N s'i, ::',': \,.. :,\11:114\\\•.',\,, .,:, s,,\\\,s>..:. • I :. I 111,1 ! 2-4 . ., ii:i..1 ' :.s: , .,. r ', / .,,,-,-,—._j-,,,. ni '\' \',..:4A441‘,• z ,• •'. - -• ••• :, \ ,-•-•.sN: ••'\ \'' '\.' \''• ., 044 I *I ' • ,:-.J '• , ,.,1 : \ . X ,-,C ,;\ '' 1 z;,,, ,,,,:.„ ,.., . .4......, • . \- . • :* 3 s‘ i N,\ 7 .0 • pi •\.-,- -. : -.. 14 .., "•.;;1 —:-......A. , _,I.'," ,„ \ i s. .:al . : 1\ \ „.\ , • ::::: 1 s .t i 4' i: 1 i ‘X - I -L., ig I I ). , , - ..-ii-r:.:.,..,-.„.,-..g_ • \ \ - , \ .. -,-,:;.•:-.:' • • • ----- - .. ,-..,--'-- ' - • .. .. • 1 a 1,, • : ; r-- . ... \ %-ik , ..,....L:s.:L..,. ,___-- -If ! :If , .,,, •..; . 1 \t , I! '/ 1 1- . , ::-.:... .:"7. - ...\LV \ • 1 I. )\- s. ,/I. . 1 , ; 111 ; .. -,- .--•.„ s , ,,,,,-2.:. . ....--.-- e„.•:• ,_ i• ,-..•, ': „ 1 I i....,•••:.P i 'N• •------.- ' -...ar_ .__\ ... ....... , ,, , 1 I I 1 : .,1.:::.: . 1 ,„.„., ...;......,..:._:71_;... .. ..1 ..._ —r- ..../. . .,,,„ 1 , 1 , 1 ...,..;. ,.... 1 t I, , 4 I.) 1 .. UJ W 0 °CC 1 T, g'12 o 1.- o,T, t-. tii° .8 f1-3 LCU:1 cow, PPJ CC n CC IS g o< 0 0 0 is w ee 2 2. $L2 x ec cc cc IM< EL < M • & Resolution No.98-24 (iire Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE ® ' .F`Gl i } S N 14 1 WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED ASp F w;4xP, ;, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,a Specific Use Permit for the • ;:,a� �=d.�_ a x =k• 1 1 -has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as X�r F :; �, � � i ; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of S •1 ;.9 7,; ?. •f the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof; and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety,morals and general welfare of the City. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for the forei • � ti( � v ;t =��_ : ��: - aft: FI NI.41 xt; ! 7a •n the property being legally described as �� r �; ;. �•�_�-� ,more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A",and as depicted on the approved development plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: 1. 2. 3. 4. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\98-490UT.WPD G -6 Resolution No.98-24 Page 2 5. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS_ DAY OF , 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Rick Stacy,Mayor • ATTEST: :fl • Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary (ire" APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Southlake,Texas 4.r. *�rbPyy"� a r • L:\COMDEv\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\98-49O fl.WPD 16--7 Resolution No.98-24 Page 3 EXIIIBIT "A" Lot 2,Block 1,Farrar Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1975, Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texas, and being approximately 23.003 acres. . ,„.. 1-4%5' C L:\COMDEVMP-FILES\RES-ORD198-49OUT.WPD Resolution No.98-24 L Page 4 EXHIBIT"B" i. I ; . ,,,� ( —- \ • Mox.or, '' I r ---- ,� ... -. • ip;- • { l !f f r i I• "I f I i I I' Ii ' oN 'ii• N iir 1 N f • l • 11 11 /, ,�' 11 f )ii i.i , ii :i:11 is ii , 11 p,,.. ,, , - 1; ‘,. .-?, . ,, , . . :,. , : ,.. „. , ... . , , ,:, . _., •, . , . 1.,.. ..• _. i.i , ..... .. , ,,, : 4Y `e _ Al •, 4.11 Ii I �• • • • ` • *1 . I —•..' - --i---.1----7--f). . Mr -'-- 1-F-'.'3 L \ ' `` • , I ���� ar ff I„ \' �\\\"u\\`\•\\ \ 1 jl I ) \. 11 \\\;;` \\ • \\\-. I '�:,� . t:\.\•\ Ill, \\\\\ \\\° - _ ►�I • , ''' , , 1: ..----4-: \.:::-. . __________-, ...,\ .. . .,.. ... ..; j c .- 9 ' I----- it ! 1r Gr _7/ - / i • h C7 W.35 r0 W o O 2 N` F` 00 O,O NWy S Z u. a u. w5 QQo6 W< 4 ® ■ L L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\RES-ORD\98-49OUT.WPD EXISTING OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA FOR GARDEN CENTER ■PROPOSED OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA FOR GARDEN CENTER 4 or I. ,-�Y�� J•. -•tV c.� �--�-� -._'r— .— '—"^—'•emu.= `— — — — — — — — - _.(19� �••-� � gggg r 1.C. � I � j. �I 1 u y � `1 C RECD APR 2 71998 • �- - _- ' � - - - - .- � - .ra=;.;ate ,. - - — -`-- �..� - . -~ . -- •. - '"`' .�s .. _ '_ •_. - ._ - -- _ - -=-" - — --- City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-044 PROJECT: Site Plan/The Roomstore STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for The Roomstore on property legally described as being Lot 1, Block 2, Village Center, Phase 2, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slides 3095 and 3096, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 2.27 acres. LOCATION: North side of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709) approximately 400' west of Village Center Drive. OWNER: The Roomstore APPLICANT: The Boerder-Snyder Group, Inc. Le CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO.NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, modifying Item#3 requiring a 6' sidewalk on the south side of this property and attempting to move the 4' sidewalk shown on the plan to the north side of the drive south of PetsMart and if that is not possible, leave the 4' sidewalk as shown. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998,with the exception of those in Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 29, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-044SP.WPD LW" r_T-1I_4 i IA- t lt I 1 I Icafficil I I i 1 j .....•.itli 41 ps;SOLI.. INTEMEDIA I 1 . ____ Itt C I • • . III r ; '' . .1 \iktitie,, 1 11111. „1 1 —1 'Emniummi 1 I 1 V ___ / 1 . I . r _ , , / 13.41 r444-Lj 1---1----/ / , .. . . .,,,, NI :.,6144 I . II 7"--,. • I r' "".1 Cr,v,..• •N\j , ' ' , ,'( rNopN, i 1 40C°I 1 i -.' • 1 i I ,s,, 1 1 ...-L J 1 1 NA\ I \ \ I 1 ! \ ; ! Hi . il I 1 HALL . L-13k' .....-7: 1_,I , 1 ; L t \ -1-17 \ 1 -- I ---, r'r -------,.,,„_ 1 N, \ \ i — 4—:1'r\, .-07 1 '' , • i , I i i 1 I 1.------7--------- :----, -i---1 IiIIIIi I1 \I tf• - \-<109 i-,' H ---------i .. F I/TKO li, I 1 FAST Crlini- F- — \ ,. u il : -Ili• l' . .k.,...L . , ) . 1111111111 ; 1 i .. ,, Ilini r , / II • 111116 I, :7..4 I 1 ' liPt- 1Wiliellinir ,----1 / :i t 1 •.a.,-,wmallill 1 I 1 1__.!.e004 —).. 1 1 il l'it''Oi415 i 111 ,i-Ri; NN,r1, I 1 11 El... 9411-\ ir • I I - i I / N 1 I 1 li i I \.... 1 1 . I i 1 1 I l' / - 1 ; / . :l', A' pk,. . , . cfl -,_.,„..t, -...,,, , . .r : 1 , , 1 R — ,....1-----400E-0---"'—l' i ''' 1 1,1 i mare-APN.,,.. :Asir ntvcs..-- 1- • ---1----i-----1---- L__ I I 71 114 410.&%,A REN-F-E_ , .444 Lir .j _ TIACT MAP N. ,..itihr i 3JstEss- t______,_11: ----_--*Ni n /1----2_ L4 _____I PO • 1 ii , 1 i • It. S - 1 4‘.., . , I - Ctrk1E ti. TR 2Ai/ OP . (u 2 • I1. 73 2 @ . - 1 • - �, 1 . ��• AGE C . Ir Pt? 1` yet _ r J 1f 1- • PET STORES FUNDING CORP. /3. "N R-PU D" "C-3" (0111, . 1 ' r .2"p G TEXAS COMMERCE `� 934 ® 3.078 0 PETERKA �„ ^ T. _ ,j .. BANK C-3 . .270 _„ ]71 7/ St r' I - _ -- - - s0UT-WAKE --Bb1 STATE OF TEXAS - 41 �� — a r„C-2" "Q-1 TELESUPPORT, INC. o�11' 0 4 0 TR 2E C2 .164 : al MIRON cv SCHELLING / / . 6 TELESUPPORT, 0 1.00 AC "C_1 " " ‘-12 TR 2 28 .607z 0 INC. Q 2.726 AC 146 4A / 1.741 0 2A � _'• 41 2 • .50 ® �1.41 0 14. 1 _ I 1 2 - p o ' �2C 5R2 IRQi � 3 (461,0„ 1� 78 i I ADJACENT OWNERS 45 AND ZONING "' 62 1 = 1 3B Ti H-� 24 ——F��,, —,M—--N .. / 2.958 0 i\.. ' REEM I 3 , I_A• el iR`!E -1VU Or1141 1111•1.1141'111 4.1.00I1/4 S71t3I 3wlgfoc rm.'.171T N VO 1 SLID/71f1M7*1 5103 rltr MI 35v.tl 3'7131N37 V11 IV 1 3•1 i :i l 3 Tt i 11a•O/NIY aIro.LSpfooir gH.L 20^ .3 - 'JNI 'dflolo uaANs-uan3o9 HHL to/wewid.7NR7r o':Cw : o (tam, ..../,L..I fi .0 i i ;,',. ? t't g § 7. Cr) ` yr 4*num "< iji1L 2 5: R ill -- 3n TI1..f!N c TM.I , r Pi Z� g4: d� , V 0 < Z oil 0 Y Y § 0. � 1 I 1 �� i I 391(mat.MU1nCE3111011,/-[-7 a uz • i I i t )(NVB 37 p03,1.07 01031 i i L L-- O J I= /1 1 I � Q _—i' .I -_ —______.---� .:3.a.t' I (AO8.09 I L t1+-. 3A9 OOOn1S3/t w _ ...AO \ (� j�'rL'1-w.�r..f•.avt..I ..,.t.~, •,0•V,OO... 10O.3I.., fr i \ rT 'I ppryVd GIV AVA3 A7?3.re I.NMv --•t_'-._-- Ti - _ cl 1 r q I U ti 1 h --"_._ 2 Y b II D tt, ' -- II \ t.�a1 Y y I , 'I LU CC 1 lg tlq 6 —yv i5 O � 4 gs' G - �6^ V W3 -- _ —f�. r g I I s , : - I 411 11'.' —`rI f i11 v _ I 4 14-1, I . '? I I a'roes a — —1 — ' -- ----- —- — w1.n,vu1.: -- id 'nod s' ?sn 03aw•r(11,[ •aw Z•)uorrina O✓31rrJ•/Sarno n oc.ud3ARH 1N3V.roV I I — 4- -- i I a 39W CS tool 3)IV N1/1�S-1Vld Atenal7311d CIA,mild 1d3''.107�13AO8NdV c W i I 17o L 1. 2. s ..... 1s r► — l •RSO[.d1eA'WNW (1*e.Ls. .w W W A, -- �.= &Oa AVM=RR:ait-WM WM, L !f v N d '11 1 N!3 !9 v 111 A e.c.Mt4e aid la lt'11 iG9e 3raa ]a, Au.wlama;s.i•swm.ta...Y >, -,• t 1 a 01 1 'I • 1 S 1 0 1 ru. hew R. MY'u.no it.wl sssogaxs(M s.RSMlos uuo lvl� IYNI! w :y..M.q Ne,ON ITYRlI 131.01 n11.,,1 Wi0/0-•1•s .01,1,w.11 'a.m. ,Rea um + M-H-ri 'wN 3fh Cillief' . . B ` ii:\ o� N B i1 11 "'- �'8 g�4�E ^ ` L L 101 0 .0 s [ 1 \ 91 'Je',LI-KC '10/, /• 0 Z el �i z 78kji J s71w1s00NI y3M3ae < a li r :W oFQ ^ I � ` (AI faa .VW iA 7 i1- o�Vr1 ' I r ysJ �bdl a wq.,.`o'^ `\ r w W< <'W b i • F ) su. < „Q3 �jH _ V= ��5 ' !a 8 \ .l`s M ,: -<a. Z.? ! ' I � R 3715'4 x 1..w...uw a F ' .,..wa"B' ' y��ih s ea W $a I 1e \\'>, ils l ,s lk.. •yy.. j�u _ o• I% �L. y I ... sePl• `-f,.\;�, `� j :t:e✓ /4'R 1xI 1?"''R \tom •�, �' !...i, -- -----, , / --- --:!.. , 1`1, \-:,,---46--...:::; R.3 e I I 'A.a--...‹.- I- Q P.: I I I I 4 A M ` I I at) SI s/ / « O ' 1 +P. s ii EE 1 ' r(; r• t 5 / /•; x1 . (itio, ::: �. i s .1:1I-I1BBte >+ / / a I. S ^ Ils 3i{ I I.... F 1' �. r ' ea i/ I;! �i y1 I \i ec-e e --1 1 I -_/ I i 11j Zi I ' t "chi V, I i a I i F, : I'e I. t I x ;J a .416 0 Mr i 'e rr 1a -le • Y' i I I- '6 d !Bak �i:t 1 Ir. ?� �� I y • 25 +, iv b ghillie,-I f; 4; 3 I 41 f ;v:? W.. l I s • �tF_ R 1I n' J ....a- 81'L'_ttinwi�'RFk1 '1_ ~r)L-��- —�• iI I' -1, I--- :Q U i { ��., , -_t •7 ,.. �- .w.+n__i- •` it +u• '"^ 5 _.:C___ �. ): i 5 -.r S 1Q�bn >i FsI k �, i� _ I I/, t I I it a p Ra i ii ° . rr��ta:, __ 0 ilw I I- iR. : ee rr h r.11A Riy-.R H F R{;.,1R I I ill_ i ly ::wR 95 ,'Ae-11 4\1 I. di 1 -ERA al -H lBA �1F� .K +,yy Hn kB w x "•1" o . l_L.1 p,v OE i i;h:R?Rt z 4 or 7 tB•a i! e e! .,,,, e; 71ats: r aEq::: i! I I x J t t! ` x4��:I 'AI aEa:.: ..an t r 4 I I I C ;! a i:•Zel II .B :!� ��- I «—I Ix E x b p_4: ... a .x bail..---- - - - _ ,.«, mow_ , '..,.,,.,.......— AM Rj- +-.^ w,Re.KRM'I i 1 OM 1,..Nw.orv,..... iF ` 5 BL m t t I 1...-n-11ai11 Tw a I a g O .. ._. (60L I •H".d) 'UAW 331V7H.L lOS g a '^..,.••_,.. u a z - - Itom o � Wg i ... _. _.. ....... . . L -?: ' C;.2 x a :. I Si • • .sw a....l 11Ia1. S City of Southiake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 98-044 Review No: Two Date of Review: 5/29/98 Project Name: Site Plan-The Roomstore APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: The Roomstore The Boerder-Snyder Group.Inc. 5933 Harvest Hill# 1095 4514 Cole Avenue. Suite 101 Dallas.TX 75230 Dallas.Texas 75205 Phone : (972)606-9096 Phone : (972) 866-0136 Fax : (972)336-0187 Attn: Leon Levitz Fax : (972) 866-0921 Attn: Eugene F.Boerder CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. (880). 1. Provide bufferyards, and plantings in accordance with the attached bufferyard and landscape calculation charts. 2. The 4' sidewalk along the north side of the site was required on the approved site plan for the Village Center Phase 2 (Home Depot)to satisfy the Trail System Master Plan. That site plan was approved prior to the adoption of the current sidewalk ordinance. The current sidewalk ordinance (recently approved)would also require a 6'meandering sidewalk along F.M. 1709 as an off-road trail. (P&ZAction 05/21/98 Require 6'sidewalk along F.M. 1709 and move 4'sidewalk on north side of building to north side of drive south of Petsmart) 3. Extend the loading area screening wall to the west to ensure adequate screening of the loading area. Screening walls must be a minimum 10' in height,constructed of a masonry material similar to the front facade of the primary structure and must completely screen the view of trucks and the loading area from any public R.O.W. 4. Confirm that the dumpster will be usable with the shown orientation. 5. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. on all facades. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. In addition,there appears to be some slight dimensional discrepancies between the site plan and the elevations. 6. Show and label all easements on, adjacent to,or significantly impacting the site in accordance with approved utility and/or construction plans. Ensure that there are no conflicts between the proposed structures and existing easements on the site. C7. Correctly show, label, and dimension the Common Access Easements on or adjacent to the site. Specifically,the 50' CAE shown alongthe north side is not properly dimensioned,the CAE along the west side is 50' in width,and the CAE along the east side is 38' in width. IM -5 City of Southlake,Texas 8. Correctly,show, label and dimension all building setback lines. Specifically,the side building setback lines should be shown as 15'wide and the rear building setback line should be shown as 10'wide. 9. Label all curb radii. 10. The following changes are needed with regard to the surrounding property information: a. Change the LUD's of all "Village Center" subdivision lots from "Office Commercial" to "Retail Commercial". (Petsmart and Texas Commerce Bank properties) b. Label all platted properties shown with the lot,block, subdivision name, and filing information. Specifically, label the following: 1. The Petsmart property as "Lot 3,Block 2,Village Center Phase 2 Cab. A Slide 3095". 2) The Texas Commerce Bank property as "Lot 2,Block 2,Village Center Phase 2 Cab. A Slide 3095". 3) The Schelling property as "Lot 5, Block 1,Miron Addition Cab. A Slide 1252". 4) The Miron property as "Lot 1R,Block 1, Miron Addition Cab. A Slide 1252". 5) The west Telesupport property as "Lot 1, Block 1, Woodland Heights Vol. 388-155 Page 13. 6) The east Telesupport property as "Lot 25R1,Block 1, Woodland Heights Cab. A Slide 1681". c. Label the LUD on the Southlake Town Center as "Mixed Use". d. Change the zoning on the east Telesupport property(Lot 25R1)to "Cl". 11. Dimension the distance from the southeast building corner to the east property line. 12. In the Site Data Summary Chart,the following changes are needed: a. Remove the word "Proposed" from the LUD designation. b. List the provided parking as 68. c. Recalculate the open space provided. Open space is the area unencumbered by paving (parking,drive lanes,dumpster pads),or buildings. (6,, 13. Note the type and height of all lighting shown on the plan. 7N -4 City of South lake,Texas * All buildings must be designed such that no mechanical equipment or satellite dishes shall be visible from adjacent R.O.W. or from residentially zoned or designated properties within 400'. This includes equipment on the roof,on the ground,or otherwise attached to the building or located on the site. * The shown driveways conform to that shown on the approved concept plan for this site. * Exterior building materials proposed must comply with the masonry ordinance and corridor overlay zone regulations. The applicant should be aware that any synthetic stucco used must be approved by the City Building Official. * The dumpster must be screened by a masonry wall,composed of material similar to the primary structure. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas be reevaluated. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Bufferyard Calculation Chart,Interior Landscape Summary Chart,Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: The Roomstore VIA FAX ABOVE The Boerder-Snyder Group,Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\REV\98\98044SP2.W PD (111101 1H -7 . C SUMMARY CHART- BUFFERYARDS The Roomstore Case: 98-044 Location/ Length of Reauired/ Buffervard Canopy Accent Fence/Screening Base Li Provided Le Qth Width/Tyne Trees Trees Shrubs Height&Material North - Required 290'a 5' - A 3 6 23 Provided 354' 5' - A 3 6 22 East - Required 239'a 5' - A 2 5 19 Provided 210' 5' - A 2 4 16 South - Required 310'a 20' - 04 12 9 431 Provided 371' E 4 11 37 West- Required 201'a 5' - A 2 4 16 Provided 177' 5' - A 2 4 • 14 *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Width of driveway was deducted from the length of the bufferyard. Other Comments: 1. Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W.,shrubs obtaining a mature height of three feet (3') or greater must be planted at a maximum spacing of thirty inches (30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. c, 2. A minimum of 50%of all canopy trees planted on the site must be 2" in caliper and 50%must be 4" in caliper. This includes plantings in bufferyards as well as interior to the site. 3. Accent trees are a 6' minimum height rather than the 4' minimum height as required by ordinance.4. One (1) existing Canopy tree is located within the South 20' - 0 bufferyard.The tree was not credited in required or provided bufferyard summary. SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Landscape %of Area in Canopy Accent Ground Cover Area • Front or Side Trees lag Shrubs (Sa.Ft.) Required: . 12,147a 75% 201 40 202 1,215 Provided: 14,250 0 0 0 0 0 *Note any credits used in calculations: a. 10%credit was given for maintaining the R.O.W. Other Comments: 1.one canopy tree is located in the interior and shown to be preserved. It was not given credit for the a provided tree within the interior landscape required or provided. C BUILDING INSPECTIONS Articulation Evaluation No.2 Case No.ZA 98-044 Date of Evaluation: 05/29/98 ce,Elevations for The Roomstore Received: 05/26/98 Rear-facing: North Wall ht.= 24 . Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 72 57 -21% Yes 72 57 -21% Yes Min.artic.offset 4 4 0% Yes " -.;�i _ ? o Min.artic.length 8 26 225% Yes 13 20 54% Yes Front-facing South Wall ht.= 22 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 66 66 0% Yes 66 50 -24% Yes Min. artic.offset 10 10 0% Yes 4 5 25% Yes Min. artic. length 17 50 194% Yes 11 26 136% Yes Left-facing: West Wall ht.= 19 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 57 57 0% Yes 57 48 -16% Yes Min.artic.offset 4 4 0% Yes 4 5 25% Yes Min.artic. length 12 27 125% Yes 12 20 67% Yes CRight-facing: East Wall ht. = 21 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta:. Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 63 57 -10% Yes 63 51 -19% Yes Min.artic.offset 4 4 0% Yes 4 4 0% Yes Min. artic. length 12 28 133% Yes 12 20 67% Yes only."•-wwsN w orwmo+ MU Yu vvnw MOP Wm vx nrw c�MP $JIV?H.LlIOS : i rl 1U1 mu 1n7vo 1N uw�w.luv rloa,ar sxOtavuNOJ 7vlzNaO plwot3o/73IOtli q.n/ S jO.L SIKOO II SH.L1(1 li =1 '3Ni •Jf101O ifGANaNt-i1Cli0a HNS '03 NOI11117ItSNOJ fIf C I Itn!oNa1Y Mott W1311 v 11bullv P i; JUL1 5 CO al •- C7) I% 11 ! /77 It.. CT) w . li ,.." ll 1111 11 Ievil ?kst › zE ! !It17. Iby ill -- 1 — 1 iIU ; IiIIii1I Y 1 I ' , 1 i- 1 3I I I Cut. c mime nln catNMr •L I orrve 72 174 o — , - t— nloa Al I (iie, d'1 r�. �, a —• +aae- ; WE 00011531 r,•••4 1 I I E 1;;, ,11II. 8 �' Iki i►,►oo-to$ ii -I 1 S �,,,,���! �L—_ < . Ill 1 b.**JJ.4 a ► i• 1 f y►••.,•: i I 1 i i ! **.��•� c .n .Vo —Y 1 lii i, I1a r.Ir 3PI,..iiirId,i Ie d F7 1,r►►.•i•i 1 1]9 1111 '8 i l; l It.0id ioi SS 1 I7r,�. •;a............. —17 . ` N _ I 1 i L_ — - - —..J Li_I= .-- - - - _ = MO -tsl - -- - -L 7p KW 1'% '0107 W1.3e1*en 1 T-3•t7rr0Z-f00011114 307000-b3Nn0'I1 AC A116dOad 1N3DWOv L........ / - (.0, Kr-on U'Ord Nv•l71NDZ 3ov►105 t0101;Dlv'lunot-lvb AMVHM•91d an I Y7d tap10O O3fOlbdr ' E I i 11;v -.4 `yN - /d • «."'Y." '..""" I �......, ,' ti. �, SVX31 '3xv iHlnos ....., :+, I 1 �. _ 321O1S YVOo21 3H1 ''�- ,it Ct• l M® , ..., .MUN.•AY*$F...l &VW V32IV 30VNIV2IQ wiz/...,,,.,-. ''�, _ n..rz m zr 41 .r.. , + • 1::: :: �_ 'n---. 41: 11111 ‘kr..1( giEl9HEEI OWN 17E1900E 3 't s ��r-- �I!a m.C'CCl ii G� t1 1 l�i 1 �A el 111111ti�hllh n UIINiet/9tU6gb1I 11 Q ME tf � 04 .Y ` } , 317...l. ,,,,,041e., Mr:.. -•-r-L- A!••, .t . ''""'.i I- ...N r: —, -,--• -• --• -__.... .....00.1.----""...- __...-:-.111- c *ed - - - 1 1 !, A, : witiorpr A i : .i.. 1 • 4---,________,-. ;,.: 1• •� t, gi . , ., ,, -4— !Ii / I ; c„, .., 1 , ,.. i l~. 1, 1 '.., _„ _____ ..„...._ .„ .. 1.1 , , i , ..... .,„, , ., ,, , . " g 3 $(I) _ 31 1 \ .., i' , 8 . .........;1... , \ 1. % ---w% . '00 ''. ' .. 5) i 1 .... si CI . 1 --.. : rt. III i \... ii rill,' .1, ot i II 1, II„, Ai, . . ... s'l, , „ . / S--- il .. 1_,,,„i: , ___\� rlo, ir ` 17 ' -=!!,,. i , • 1.k ., E I I )), . —..�_. • I. Ce, TN.,.MT 111.14, ' i :I 1 I No sN RAY.Pb•••.wss.w r1H- 11 ' ••MO rr1 WI ruomn• uu.r. ( n.u.n,u.,•ur n� 7. xm ru mrw•w rare •nr nun x�u e12 3 I 8 M iit PM r•sra wr•e+w 1,M wr••.wa Ylcr SJI Y7H L4-OS rurrnrat' S80iJY>fiNOJ 7Y88N80 , rrnntaX 1,�, en R 'JN1 '1flOId uamcs-s808808 VHS 'OJ NOfi3fl814NOJ tic £ ff O.LSWOOIf gH.L . •' 1 IN MOD NI 301S'MIN V A W1S v d R N • 131 6- a i3 01—i--3:—.4 , 4 I; co 1 1 i I , \ I (H____t___Ii04 II t 1 1 cr 0 Q! I I, t , r I I I- 11 I I I •i, H Lt' ' 1E] r I OW � I 3 �€ I �� 1 -- UI jor 1 i I 1 \I i i V ! 1 V41111111 i 3 !/\ IT? II t r I Is . eFl J . \ 1 i ; Ii , , , I pa , , I ._ p I s ,1: ' CH-- , I ; '� r , , el I I ' e1:9 . . gi 11 L_ I.. I I c 1-1 1 s • s SW 1�r1L( S'r lSmd tl31m3+3wr+ g vvvw-•n.►sss srole/ WInttmas"IT"vwisrnrvvv asmmmg$Y7H.LQOS3sass srna yvnn'NI WOO y]n�v ttso HIPd101JY1 tNOJ 7Y1dNd0mimosa]Larose ' .a.nn�.rOJ NOI.131141NOJ tit £ ggOISPIOOV &ILL1'11 _ 'JNI 'an0f0 11GANt•1dG1d01 Ell (...., IIPt t: t t cg3 8 al cr • i xr 2 .f."-. W- aarR i i ii Cr 2 Egli o o Q • . 'INC M 2 1�Iie�rB:�. ' r__ 1911 1 i Cs�.. .. ♦♦��/`�`O �� •Q " II®IiiiiIQi•-ICI I I ac .: - �.:/ ••/�r=� - qv �a�; �= - - - -.- ;•n- . Hi - 1 • ... O)%\��� \ Offe <> •-•• r:z®\®\. \ I': ❑ I Roe 1�1 j i o Y .• \® " ♦, ® 1. .ICI• 0U I � It i: • o �I •� 0 .T'NV s/ O• �� <�� ♦• Mil O ® 1_.1 arts N. \ C, ,...... ...‘„,,,,,,,_\,,,,„ rii, .. _ , •l',/kg'',\-- — "1r.i. lit„ e, *,— — — -ar ei ...,.... 1 t r— . ...0 ,,,,„.„ ,c., , s''.0*</- ' /.,16-7:..2..77....".,----..--",tii. :-"-.,1 :, z •i. 1 _ __ _ .. '.. �G ' oli Qo ii.,... lid_ . .,...,a a ow iiiiiiiiiii iUU • .f .„11 NI"ail• 4.11111• CM=lei 1 ••:1-1::::::::fly= :I . I I ciI IItIiiiuiin 'l I it . 1 '#0 , -•,.., • 0 0 IN 11 °O 1 or : = 1 © I E _ r MI i g i: Siy'r4s1] sw1013e I Ciii ,...—,L-I_,i--1—, —.I- . .i..i.,A--.it- .1,-_ T; 3. - - • 'I 714 -/3 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-037 PROJECT: Site Plan / Lot 4R1. Block 6, Southridge Lakes, Phase C-1 STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan on property legally described as a portion of Lot 4R,Block 6, Southridge Lakes,Phase C-1,an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3774, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 1.229 acres. LOCATION: North side of West Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709)approximately 250' east of North Peytonville Avenue. OWNER: Southridge Center, P.C. APPLICANT: Safeco Land Title CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Four (4) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, deleting Items#1 a(driveway spacing) and#1 d(stacking depth). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998. L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-037SP.W PD L 1 T-1 . 1 A --4", ' \-;,\-. ,i__ ' , ')\\ I___g___ , AMA 1,-sig H / ' , ilitisw‘..piirl,,,,,-00.11-11_1 -;.--z 1 , uiuii:Iull'aim .iIIt*$j111• II I \\J ,, 7- 1 I Iptt•ija illr ima I � 1 1 . , IN tow b_______Afftwer I im . 1 pel ��auplld !`r, , ,ter 1. __ t.:::lio Weilktibr.,,,, . vg ii _____ I v*1411." 4ft a 1:i 41117c: ,-.c\ --7 stico . *v . ft-atop ,,I4m. INI 411Eitt‘ hr1111110:007 ,°*ritO \ -,\'- . toommi. go. gravgillOAN 444164 , mi t... e•-•• 44 A a P %,:41111 rpm Dui ■ 64 ,,G � �, • ��� y� . ... iN � ...,, ., , , ,,, , , i • go-,...� � ■ ►��� Ionin male siel �� E 1 oi6uPw- "P ball milratit ..: NM .!= / gm.�„�..�avn A1 , _I , _....a., er 7 \ 31 .1 \- --,-<--7 ..z. ,_4.c-,_ A pzitS E-51 pi __•. am. MI HIGH Mitt Acji .`'=', t---h:r: Oi4s' NM SW"- RIIIMOw --,1: . .. .4 ) '1 FM WI 1140,,,„ti AO , . % /-(- mAtIi- is.r.-ii 7 0-0104Vms'inusi c,2 :::4-‘iii- " gks,- . 1/10. 40 %ili: ill \ IliiiiL L...Nim IRLIIIIIIIIIFFIA **V* lalw ,,- anual. lipivmeikits. 4k...,e0 .. \ - , • , .__IL__ ,s\N B. 42- siiiegrAiRrazo ,Ndik.4* � I I P -Jill /� Vim Gozoo A‘ L- ..• 0 %UM I fd� H ',ONE J it :- • MI c ` :w + TRACT MAP ia:/k*A 0. �T OR; 45 ' ne _______r __age t' ft 17 Erax ioo a s I 32 •46°' 19 17 ' E' 4 °NI sal V.9 a 111 ir . s I 5 x 31 II 50 r t: 20 er s 5 - I a M rs 1 t« � 2 I'ION .1 z t2 6 I a 30 a CT >, " r `� on D I 3 s ' 13I R it a 28 . 27 26 $ 25 $ 24 23 ' 0 19 7 3 d i 29 1 4 /� 3 r I to i ems � US no n• us 22 �' c 9 ,� n r10 18 x • 8 7x I ES S e 21 ft m iM w 17 x I 9 I 1DG E LA t 20 fig, trC_3rr en 144 zx is x ,o i s0� 6 a ,'$ CC14 ssi SOUTHRIDGE CENTER ax 15 x w ofA TR 1D5 a 11 a I 4 m U I 8.833 0 5.165 I ;(bi4. 12 5 J00 /j0/2 to to I e/ P .T. 13 s ,,, I II 6 �/ IOUTHLAKE "C-3" 14 x ' CENTER: _ 964 0 5 1 INVESTORS no �SOUTHRI E - — - - - -F.M. 1709 TR ' 3E STATE OF TEXAS TR 3G .915 . 1264 TR 3 n 1.797 AC I rr S—P-1 140 740 CARROLL ISD TR 3C $ 1.31 AC TR 3C1 .69 AC = --(111.10f VG TR 3C2 • 10 AC - ADJACENT OWNERS �. Fl AND ZONING ioN TR 3C2A i / Yv 1 j '. AC i /="3 r.ARR1L r. AD City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY CCase No.:7A 98-037 Review No: One Date of Review: 5/15/98 Project Name: Site Plan-Safeco Office Building.Lot 4R1.Block 6.Southridge Lakes,Phase C-1 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Safeco Land Title , Burson and Williams 777 Main Street Concourse No. 10 3838 Oak Lawn 1505 Fort Worth.Texas 76102 Dallas.Texas 75219 Phone : (817)877-1481 Phone : (214) 520-2221 Fax : (972)445-5047 Attn.Jeff Davis Fax : (214) 528-6820 Attn. Bill Manicom CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/13/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 862. 1. The following changes are needed regarding the driveways ingressing and egressing the site according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634: a. Provide the minimum driveway spacing(100 feet)from the right-of-way of Southlake Boulevard for the southeast driveway. This plan proposes 62' -6". (P& Z Action 5/21/98: Delete) b. The southwest driveway shall comply with the right-in/right-ou1.driveway requirements of Ordinance 634,Appendix 5 (forwarded to the architect). c. Show a Common Access Easement(C.A.E.)2' wider and centered over the southwest driveway. Additional easement will need to be dedicated. d. A minimum 50' stacking depth is required for the northeast and southeast driveways. The plan proposes 32'-6". (P&ZAction 5/21/98: Delete) * The driveway in the southwest corner of this site is not subject to review. It was approved on the previous site plan. 2. Provide the following information regarding horizontal and vertical articulation: a. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ordinance. 480, Sectiqn 43.9.c.1.c. in compliance with the attached articulation evaluation chart. b. Show building height and wall height for each elevation. c. Delete the words"and articulation"from the masonry note in the lower right-hand corner of sheet SP3. a City of Southlake,Texas 3. Include or make corrections to the following items in the Site Data Summary Chart: a. Site Data Summarx Phase I Phase II Total Land Use Designation Retail Commercial Gross Acreage (Same as plat) Net Acreage (Same as plat) Number of proposed lots 1 Number of Stories 4. Correct boundary bearings and distances to correspond with recorded final plat. 5. Note the type of pavement and width of Corporate Circle. Note the type of pavement of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). 6. Provide the following Land Use Designations for the adjacent property: a. West property(Lot 6R)L.U.D.=Retail Commercial b. North property(Lot 4R2)L.U.D. =Office Commercial c. East property(Lot 5,Block 6)L.U.D. =Retail Commercial d. South property(Carroll I.S.D.)L.U.D. =Public/Semi-Public 7. Provide the following information on the graphic of Sheet SP2: a. Show the number of stories of the building. b. Label the type of surface material for walks(adjacent to the building)and parking areas. c. Clarify the"Limits of sideyard"note in the northwest corner of the site. 8. Show,label, and dimension the Utility Easement along the north side of the lot. P&ZACTION:• May 21 1998;Approved(6-0)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, amended as noted above. * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA98- 037" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan,landscape plan,irrigation plan, and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fees, Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. �z-s City of South lake,Texas * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Safeco Land Title VIA FAX ABOVE Burson and Williams VIA FAX ABOVE David Mc Mahan VIA FAX- (817)329-4794 L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98037SP1.WPD C C • Articulation Evaluation No.1 Case No.ZA 98-37 Date of Evaluation:5/15/98 Revised : 5/29/98 Elevations for Safco Office Building Lot 4R1,Block 6, Southridge Lakes,Ph.C-1 Received:4/13/98 Front-facing: South Wall ht. = 14 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Re.uired Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 42 20 -52% Yes r �' ,, o Min.artic.offset 2 3 50% Yes 2 5 150% Yes '.` -„R 11 20 82% Yes Min. artic. fen � � � �� .. Rear-facing North Wall ht.= 14 - Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Re•uired Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 42 20 -52% Yes . s";; k: ' :" ; Min.artic.offset 2 3 50% Yes 2 5 150% Yes Min.artic. length ' :4; ; 0_ 11 20 82% Yes Right-facing: East Wall ht.= 16 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 48 17 -65% Yes 48 20 -58% Yes Min.artic.offset 2 3 50% Yes 2 5 150% Yes Min.artic. length 4 4 0% Yes 5 7 40% Yes CLeft-facing: West Wall ht.= 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required ;Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 36 17 -53% Yes 36 20 -44% Yes Min.artic.offset 2 3 50% Yes 2 5 150% Yes Min.artic. length 4 4 0% Yes 5 7 40% Yes C , , 7T-7 • ••• PIP.1111........i PO•••1011.1. •ii I NVld MIS I I I' 'II li311111311T or..PM MY VIP•• ..s,,C1•t..t,s. ....„00-,10...,,....l•••1.........•00P,..100.. : 14 11171,1(c.." • 8111110L1_1111 : ;:,•___. III 1 Ai .1 ;.‘,,s, `-;;: l ; • r`.. svm•Al141103 MIMI 1:191141(105 AO Ala 1 ( J I 1... ,rr, ;. 7,4„... :,. . 1 : 1I''' •".`" ' Omaitne 331140 0333vS j t, i I I. s•,-. A wrA 7,• (..., , ‹•__,.:. I I 1 .1 .. 1 Ili t i i z zi i! : j-e . ' , ;1 144 11. ,./ r..../ i ...."."....."' ; I \ ....' 11..* ,, -• 43 Cri ill ,, !•:3 !fi , ; .4•.'i -...3 if31 :,1 vS, hi ..- i • I li iil . ?.1 irf H. fil \ •• ( , 39 911 9 14 II ,, • . • ! , ... ,b. ,.. ,, , ,, 1.•......PM r t. Si/ V I '.Vi 11106..• PI II.: " — -.. •----Pr.a:4— • I I— • ..S Ili S i - I 1 I -'1( I :: '..!.' ) I - - - -- I 41 r I 8 I I I 1 'r 3 '!1 ,•1 t I! I I I I °31 111 VI - I. I I r 1 i I i P lia Iti j f., 1 ;Ii _______J ,1, ; , I II • '\(4. I-D s • a , .. r• 1 s' - .. ." I 4-- • ---1 : •i 1 , , , t , ill !il •-I it 1:1 fr: .1 . . I ' /WM 1 • rilt 11 ' li i I:, 1 :1, 1 . i ,:- I; i 3 L ll/ till ,..,.. : I Iii! ill ; • r - H if * if I I I Mil _ 1.• _ 1 . —4 tOli 1 i . I! 1 IIII § i.illd Iiir. m ' al ; •-i• 1 . 1 §! - ..:1:i ii i 1 I I, A i ... I ,I 1 11 p :-___ !--- ii 1 . ,..I vl .,,,.. lle .1 411 , 9 VI s lid ...,.. , i 'II Oil L. Ar IliV: i 1 1 f.. 1 i i A -.) .....1. ' 1 , 1...o.•le Is low : ,• I I i 14 iii .. • , I t i I ;r-1 1 Z_It I 1 g4 i l< li;114 14 31 I - I P 1 1 . li 1 i 11 i V•" .11 1 d .( 111 "-ittil I' -----1 - • , . ,I t am mm.t.ams. . • vi4.'i /If . I s r s, 1 .4--... -- -i- Pik' I .1 ,X 1 i 11,-. - -I- - - - --L — . - t. • 1 _ _. 4 6,I i • ; :I \ t ' i 1 __..... 7-•,I:: -1- — '-c•1i._ 't...: Ii. it 1 I i r IT 1 ', . I ...... _\_...j ."c i vi-ij 1 lj L ....r ......L . .--------,4- \.......O. • . 1,41- P ,___1,... ..? ' •oti _f pays mon mm. .1 •.ot!•ff.2,.....2.11..•.: ,I • .9.—-.17______ _____:_____________7____. ii :-.., , • , : . •, , 1 .1 11 i I a I 1 1 i I f i; lb 1:a.i f...„ 11.':•.;-CII;'• • • .... ,., . i•-• '-I )::' , ,. iiI' icl irre it! l'' I:1 irl :;ii II 3 !.." 1;2 ir: r.. 1 I I I ' '' 7 ' .-1 !i4 9 01 ill ,41 ii. 1,:i is •-1 IV Oil i ,;•, ik., r t•A ii 4q,-,, .` k 11 kl e Fli is 1 ii: ill I I!! A I lin ! F-1 k., 3 I ' 1 I 1 i I 1 I -7T-S • y '311 133131131V Nv Id ..111S (1.308V-IN3 I'I I'I; • ,..,•,.. 0110.1/left lIelcii*Tee I I I 01 111111'11 U1 ,Eir..110111111 ', - ....iliill We/WW1 we,iliell Well.V/18211110t Oil - . , orl MOW*limmoure. i l . -._ • , ..„ .0. - 211232 '21921102 11111111191 lorilemos ic.AV, 5. 1 ,Il I I, a Drocnins 331330 003JVS ;.7 , _ • _ -__, _ _ (11101 •• II/ I 1 I r i i 13 ' u 8 g ; s, I Y L!7 •Pf 22 1 ..11 I ,. \i . ....1 i ;:II i "4 • I II ilzfill';'1 7 . -I I. 0_\N.,:: s i. 'tfi - ;130 Itegt; ; I lis•t 1,,11. i E vl : ,rialza: z• *3 iv..,. I .:.! i li;;• 3•11 l''•!r741!!- ifo..i! A - 1 I— 1 if . i i I ilif 1 lithil.11 ' ; tt Z • .' 2 . < . • I ill' -- • ii ..1 , , , .iiigli, 1 . E.v., 0 1-ir-iii,. ,div,: 1 1 , 1 I 1 ill 6,,j.J.,j val,14 I !i les P gLiHil E :1'' g 1 1 1 Iii iliii i i i• i Ill III 1;1111.111;311i/ " i i:1‘..1.111 6! • I Ii g I 'I 1 2 ' ''g ' ! - -•- 1 I I . , II :itt, I i .61,1 1 • siv 1 17 1 I I I)I— .... 1: I . ;• — a.1 f•,, 1°' . , tr ' , t • I a •.•-l•-••AEI I -. -----)--4-- r__4 ''I ' 1-4....- -,4, ..-- .1 II- __ ! e I, i , RIO-II V Il4c11103 031011old. i .- i a '1 , - I II ''.,,.., • — , '-',. 1--r° '? ,-... i N• -1-• , - '1 r i '4 ,. - .... ...... ....moo•aane •"*. 11 ' ' .' i-.•./,', i • •• : 9 i ' a .: :. • e / 1 1 f 2 ' 9,:',1 ;,•-• i • . . 1 1 , i , : • co, ' I . 1 - 1 1 / .. Z, • I f -9.;:. i :' ' 1 i ' , ;- -:, ........‘ .44 ' ..-L-• 1r•-. 4.4, -'.ii;ii.;:1; - -^•;2'..-z r.-_ -z".:".`-'/• 4 L , ; • -i ! ; , 1 ; , I : • '1 1 I! , ;, ' • Y •; . i . 4 "...1 ',..-- t • •';• t • 1, ',•-s II . , f I ••••, . .. 21, t 1 ' .1 .pi.-i, 0 , i.PI st,.*:4 1.1 I i . 1 ;, .. .: :al 1 , 3 g ... 1;11,- i • 1; •• . 11 -s o 1;•;1 - ' * 1.' 1 I .?.,2., , . •, .; _j ..1 i ;• —1, I • : ,;•.-. ' II -lei- -- s,,,/ sit 12.4 I o, .,I •C I n :_ i 2 " ••• • oli 1 .1, . I; .• ,---- , 1411 g; • ; . , ',/.". g ___Z ; ; . i _ ! -I LI • 1 . s'• • , , er ..t id r',- I ifk-u, : i , ;, I • 1 ' I • :,. , rii I _:__ ,;, ., , s a ; ;1 1 1 1 ' '. . . ••• t ,1 0 E. . t i f A t,fi ,: :P• '. ' i - - .1 _' u [0 i.; • I ; .';,.1 V 1, . las! 1 i 1 4.-; s•i• I . . no-- ..'„ •• ' ,I 1 ; ! . 41' . ',: -,' •: ., .•i —. : \• ' —4i— .;• 141 I 1 f ' !.., I .; .„ ,...._.,0 . -./. , . it : ., . 0 . :,: • ),.4. ..---;T- 4'''• ,, •:' el I hi : ' .. ;71 - t.; III ,Lt, [0:, .., . .: : , •II•• ":2•22— . -7----72'47,----— I .,., . ....,,, ...... .........,,..,,,, ...,.. ,..t I 7 —1"1„..' 75:41 yE,1 IN , 1., s,v • : ' .;131 t? '.:,..-• . 1 ,,'"; .; 1 ; 9,, A.‘,-11 ._•,:_::t `1 - gi 1:-,%! 1 'NNW 5:;-1,\,i. I V .:-.•;. :.t I, V; . igt 1 : 1 "d; '.....,_a is, ' • ”a!: 4 • i 1•.• $i - —..,--.--r I :,66 , )`. '', 1 o. —1 . oh '. l',', _4_ L \at.,__ Ji ••• i. . ' ,,. a. :ft i.:4),. . •i; .7.:-.,i- •. .-.. • , , 4.. 4'.. ' - 1 • 1 1 til . I f '. .- • : 1/) !I ''2 t. I 1, 7 -- t I I • v.,-...e72••• . 'it ' I- 1 i I • _______"" .4 ! L . ,..-•-,.... ....-.•-...........2.........2 • • - 04..., - - 7.• .1' I I 392taiWaKtgij I ''', ' • 2': .j /\•'''I I i P ., ............. - • r •" I° .i* .1 - I ! ...\ li ....-........- i;1111 '-' ; I I.• 'I'•. I - I I I 1: . ;c ; !li CM" I e II f „it 1 P i -: I , .. j ,---. , ,.. , i i _. IP---jil ) i ,I I; 1, . 4. I %.1 I t!I 1 A.: ' I 1 , . tfi as I I-.I • I. I,.. I.!! \I Ill V 1 l' -•?.. ,.. • I • i '311 11431111113111 . SNOLLVA313 ONOw8 , _ 1 I . . . ...�..e. 1I I , I a11 71&t� EUM • I '`J d•. - SVX31'♦MY*OM NI"17.11tl/gF A al," I i '"+w•'• ONI011fl8 331110 0033VS 1:» 1. 'I:I Y a CD Cii .iir, .11 li i -I . . 11 11 I� h _ 7 --- a� - ,.... I JI .I ____-. r�^ � nn.l it 11(lI tiwm"!: ( 'II•illlet ! a Malb. a, 1 -- 1 ilseiill _ N.- I a '., ,i, .-:,;:, miI. .�.- Ni I ? • M I AWE" , hCxGaQ,, i.ai----I ',f�l�I ,i!I "I;I�lil'! 7 3 3. I) t�-_ i. ;Iil ry,l i - I I IIII I„,il ll',II� • IIIII'I a , ,; \''II le I; k-I .• ,,,,i�,:l III I - _-i 1 If..L','p1 I 11 II Ieh.,. ��I I I' 'I a I Tom. :v im. ' "'�"- 1 I II I i. II111 �I� IWIC r .II��'ll,l _-'-►-. 1E i I,; III Il,,n,ate• m a. a •. tiler,-•„ .C �L t?1iaa.w , fsw_i'.�` crmaai , men nv,vg.r/ ,i.1,11/.11i11:. M: tl. 1:t. c.,i,..,-,..;; .., cum.1 Ir NUM 3� _ r�' : Illll j!+�LI I -11� + i '.14IIP �� lug 1,l 40411 ilil �ti7i `y r a�w �I�I co, a. kit 14-4 I i t a ." 'II�1 II,I Ills I�11 II1iIr.,Ilill��l y maim4. I��I",I, . i '. _� il jllll� Ii III �� I;I, , I' III I I NI., : ut lq� I I I a w \ I I !t i t� 1 li. i C UI , 'ill I 0 - 1IIl1 11 IIIII,' 'i'911! ��T f s.z, NI iY�••r f` �� �If�� re I d \ -! ,r lip k a r N'2 sue. I r- \ ......3 h:, nsw.. I Ail ra...N. ommoor 11 ' i M 1 !�`llli:'1 Il l r. -ism, � .: .°+s,tr+ r.:;.r+ 3� t om' (h.,ll, / N •cz • �}1 .r.. n,o..., ,I 1 s'..- r-7/,aQa rlsa s : r .nn,:� ,s K-tiyd r r P . NI, II III ' 4.t Irts,`rT k ♦ • wi I i� i-111l11111 .1111d1ii '� I.:• It! i II lill,l' :;rip . I+ill I -- ['I 1 lir, 1' 1I _ i, I.11jI I FM M a /ru,• ij 1 it' °d.- c _. i t I I t IN , jl ill III„it f /,! i,. �•MIS I �� Ii I I Mal�1' t {�,�I I',,1�;11 r�l I I, ,I i! ' K I e� -�mop- j , �, �1 r: J' IL, ,. .t -. ,.•,,7 s.«a •a;./ fgt.' ./ "7T—/0 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-036 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat- Longwood Addition (submitted as Coventry Park Addition) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat of Coventry Park Addition on property legally described as being Tract 2A3 situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72;Lot 1,T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3584, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas;and Lots 2 and 3,T. Beedy No. 72 Addition,an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3775, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a total of approximately 32.1701 acres. LOCATION: East side of North Peytonville Avenue at the intersection of Plantation Drive and North Peytonville Avenue. OWNERS: Ruby L. Hill, Carleo A. Capili, M.D., and Lee Fahrenbrook APPLICANT: Kingdom Park Developments, L.L.C. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District, "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District and "RE" Residential Estate District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Twenty (20) RESPONSES: Six(6)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Sharon and Yves Meyer, 1925 North Peytonville Avenue, Southlake, Texas, opposed. See attached letter. "The development of this Addition will forever `close in' a portion of our land with no access to city streets." (Received 5/5/98) • "We are willing to support the Waterford Park Addition Preliminary Plat Alternate 'A'. The rear access easement will provide access to the most eastern portion of our land. Without this easement this portion, approximately 3 acres would forever be cut off to city street access. If granted this easement it is our (lire intention to rezone this portion only to SF-1A and replat it as a single three acre lot." (Received 5/21/98 from Sharon Meyer) City of Southlake,Texas Crw. • Mike and Vicki Dumont, 598 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "We are concerned about the oak trees-ordinance, loss of trees. Also, the set back requirements. Coventry Manor just put a home in our back yard overlooking our fence." (Received 5/6/98) • James and Catherine Lancaster, 600 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, in favor. See attached letter. "As a result of the developer's cooperation, we support the zoning change and preliminary plat applications." (Received 5/7/98) • Dale Clark (Southlake-Coventry, Ltd.), 16250 Dallas North Parkway, Dallas, Texas, undecided. See attached letter. Property owner has concerns with drainage and sewer services,and that the development name is too similar to Coventry Manor. (Received 5/7/98) • "This afternoon I talked with John MacFarlane in reference to the preliminary plat North of Coventry Manor. He represented to me that the tract will sewer west into the N-1 line access through Plantation and that storm water will be retained onsite and not added to the 60" line that we put in through our property and Mr. Goodman's property. Also the subdivision name will not refer to Coventry. Based on the city and Mr. McFarlane following through on these items,we have no problem with the preliminary plat." (Received 5/21/98 from Dale Clark, Southlake-Coventry,Ltd.) • Paul Sullivan, 1900 North Peytonville Avenue, Southlake, Texas, in favor. See attached letter. "I have reviewed the developer's plans and feel they meet the requirements set forth by our existing land use plan." (Received 5/7/98) • Russell and Lana Holley, 692 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas, undecided. "I would like more info. on who and what is going in behind our property--I need a setback." (Received 5/7/98) Four(4) responses were received outside the 200' notification area: • Sandra and Gerald Edelman, 922 Turnberry Lane, Southlake, Texas, undecided. See attached letter. "I have a concern about the additional traffic through the area." (Received 5/7/98) • Scott Summy, 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100, Dallas, Texas, in favor of. See attached letter. "I am satisfied that John has taken great care in preparing this plat to ensure 1-acre lots and has taken time to address all concerns of those who may live in or around this new proposed site." (Received 5/20/98) L City of Southlake,Texas • J. Scott and Brenda Mattheis, 955 Brittany Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. See attached letter. "As property owners at 955 Brittany Court, we are strongly opposed to any development, rezoning, platting or re-platting that includes the possibility of a road being constructed designated as Brittain Drive." (Received 5/21/98) • Caroline and John Havens, 1303 Wakefield Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. See attached letter. "We are opposed to `Alternate B' of the above-referenced project. More specifically we are against the road running north into the Rougemont property (between lots 5 and 6)." (Received 5/21/98) P&Z ACTION: May 7, 1998; Approved(5-0)at the applicant's request to table to the May 21, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. (Public Hearing was closed) May 21, 1998; Approved(3-3) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated May 15, 1998, accepting Alternate `A'; deleting Items#1 a, lb,2a,2b,2c,and 2d; and also noting that there is a potential conflict with the name of this subdivision. Motion failed. Motion to deny (3-3). Motion failed. According to Texas Local Government Code, this item is approved by default due to no action by the Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 1, 1998, and Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated May 15, 1998, with the exception of those in Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated May 29, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-036PP.WPD L May 5, 1998 Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Reference No: ZA98-036 We are opposed to the Preliminary Plat of Coventry Park Addition. Our property, Rougemont, lies adjacent to the north border of the proposed development. We share 1800 linear feet with the development. We have requested a dedicated access along the northeast border of this development. This would allow access to the land behind (east of) our house so that it could be sold. . This request is in compliance with a development ordinance requiring a dedicated access with development of greater than 1000 linear feet. The developer of Coventry Park Addition will tie into a similarly created access,just south,through the Coventry Development. We originally purchased this property with the hope that the adjacent land owners would build ranch style estates on their property. In fact we understood several of the owners L intended to do this. Recently their plans have changed. With the development of Coventry Addition our plan would be to develop our land into several large estate lots. The development of this Addition will forever"close in" a portion of our land with no access to city streets. Our land is only 390 feet wide yet 1800 feet long so the only truly feasible access is off Leeds Drive. We have attempted to resolve this matter directly with the developer. Today he indicated that further discussions with us would not be helpful., Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 1-1711) -- Sharon aes Meyer 1925 N. Peytonville Southlake, Tx. 76092 817-329-5306 L REC'D MAY 0 51998 • . ._ . . ./....; .-' • • • ' ..,r' • % : _,, . , \....-- \\. :. : •, L / Ct.; \••• • _____ •• 3 .--- • . cc'l-4,A6) .-----,..--------; I \ \ \.. . .. . •. r-- t ---... r--1 1 \ ` ‘ \ • SI Pl.CIR.- '\ • ! • I ! \ „,,L t • • ..-----.7 • \ AI • . I :----t *---• • • ,.....-. ..., . sc., •; • • . . —;•=t i ;----• I . 04 C I '‘... ..; 1 ar _L-,...:=1 r—g 4kP- r ; ,....._____ . , .. 5......_,____. ! , ..,„ : , ___. , , . • . . . _.... , . ,, , ,__ , , \ \ , : • : : .,_ ...• ; , :‘ , , , , , .• , , . „.., , . I „ , , IH , I :•••••• 1•••• •31 1. ." I i I ! ; • I I \ •• _.,.,. . • • , 1 t . 11--- 1': ..1•.i CO , \ :----:batikair-tu ‘ • VI or I 7 ; ! ! . • Ts.7.••\:: 47° I ...•- i 7---. . ,•-- I .. , aegily.„„ti'l s. \ I•-:;••.„,"„,•!. . , — „,• :.'...-,,-:.-s...2s:IIs.s•i'0-! • • s,.,•i \t\ .,, \ 7 „ / •\ • •-- c.-.11)X- ; ; - : ; ; i • • ' ' .;--, •—‘.:; c-Zai• -T--r— • ii __ • . ' 1 • ,,.L. I 1 1! 1 1 i • 1 .. s. . : -...--. , -.4t• . .. ..le • . -- •-•• ...--" I .ir -.‘,..• .t., I.....••• i . ‘'‘,..OP: CIL .., '....!ARC .............. • t i 1 : .c V ; " t •''' ... -.s••••,, 4°46 It • 4 ' I .• ! ; i ' • • r i ' : 1 t i I ..• '''''...'7,...„ t eve..0•1 • s - •:-----. ' A ` ; I;---77-Th-----41-......4_, . f t.....2.. I i i 1,A0P4SA: 1 /1 -... . --- 1---71411k. ,It.'i 1:i i ii . dov ; — : , . ; .. iet-----i ..- 1 J! -.33 I, -.... •....air _%.•.!10 1 :1 I ' *.c.....LI I 1 t 1Tii_co— 1 ;... A.i.'61:... . ... _.1 1 i• \ / , 1 T"--nr c----1 1 . ii I ;-........„! 1 ilrk‘t r•- __>- . ! I ...•••. ; I I j i — . ..._.../ • : • I i .6koSS 1 • : -9.1X . ej.,71 .;..,.....;—.---. . 2•-- . : : ..-\ .•;,%.`,C5 9 , Sit . .-- - 7-1' I ; T : :7-7 i • ......--. '; - • •--;*". %----":":,--sc---."-- -.: . \:\ --':'-<‘;.,41i.________ ,-•._....._ •.„ _, .... ..,- ,, . „ „ . .,. ---,4„.......",_........--. ./.........'7.:... ".....:222.. .. 1 1 I..". .. 1... -.. .H 0410.T. It i I i ''' '',.j 1 I I 1 I 1 1 i:IlLalgali6r % / 4)5,:...:•47.7.'............. ‹: 1 \ ...• • t /".'........-Z.r.-- ! ')..C.S........ ...':- ., i \ t 1•••••••-•...-t1 . .‘ I ! [ 1 ! 1 / \ i("7"77="'M 1 ! ' - ,... .......i • t t 1 • • • i 1 .t... 7.--.= • i . ......:•.......:L'......'......<'''.. ...'''C ... -" 1,'..iRtn• • . s• .•''. I . I %Illie/ '• , .. . ..1.,. _..,'' .' '. • •\s tii:‘5 • 3 iatii ,Iii c--- . .,---___•-:,---.----,....--_-:-:.;- / ..-- ! . . ,• : • . / . , ... .., , , -.t__-----2---- ---.--•----- ......--„--; • iii 1 i 2 ---,_ i L / ,..., _ iiier.,4,.:„...., ,i \. • 1 i i,"1"12-1! .i.<. \ 1 SA-4- .,...______L......-.., ` I :I 5134^CL 10 a r••••.. i I ' • .. . : , , i 1 , 1 al L May 6. 1993 City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake,TX 76092 Reference No. ZA 98-034, 035 & 036 (copy attached) On behalf of James and Catherine Lancaster at 600 Garden Court, Southlake, Texas 76092; as a result of the developer's cooperation, we support the zoning change and preliminary plat applications. This is based on conversations that the lots immediately to the west of 600 Garden Court will be deed restricted with a 100' build set back line — additionally, two of the lots already have building plans showing approximately 150' feet to the back of the proposed residence. The goal is to maximize separation and privacy. Backyard set backs, especially on one (1) acre zoning, are critical and should be heavily considered in the review process. Thank you for your attention. dest regards, 111 J es and Catheri •ster E closure REC'D MAY 0 71998 • MAY-06-1998 14:53 FFCM WARREN CLARK DEU'DCH TO 19174889370 P.002 The fullowing form may be tilled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission,667 North Carroll Avenue.Southlake,7 exas,76092. REFERENCE NO.: ZA 98-034 0 3 r 03�j I am (in favor of) (opposed to) (undecidedrequest sed about) the re,uest fur the following reasons: tee. FttkikiS RFCV MLy 07 7998 SIUNATURE: C7 VV o2,24A. �pj� 50 1,044 0.0 mod • (Please Print Name) VAL {A_f. ADDRESS: 11Q 50 S / • Owl soutntake-Coventry Ltd. 16250 Dallas N Pkwy Ste 210 PI TONE: }u_-i 51 71 Dallas Tx 75248 This proposed development is directly north of Coventry Manor. We have met separately with staff and the applicant to express concerns over drainage and sewer service. Warren Clark Development strongly opposes the proposed name for this subdivision. Any use of Coventry gives prospective homeowners and all present Southlake residents the impression that this is a continuation of Coventry Manor by the same development team. We have spoken to Mr. McFarland about this and he has told us that he will come up with a new name. L TOTAL P.002 S Al • PA UL SULLIVAN 1900 North Peytonville Southlake, TX 76092 May 7, 1998 To; Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, City of Southlake. My name is Paul Sullivan and I own the property at 1900 N. Peytonville which is across the street from the proposed Coventry Park Addition. I am out of town on business and am unable to attend tonight's meeting. I am writing this letter to voice my support for the subdivision. I have reviewed the developers plans and feel they meet the requirements set forth by our existing land use plan. The proposal allows for the preservation of most of the existing trees on the land and will be a nice addition to our neighborhood. The developer has carefully selected builders who have a reputation for building quality homes in Southlake,this will allow us to maintain the quality of homes in our neighborhood. (kwI feel that in order to maintain the safety of our street we need to have a three-way stop installed at the entrance to the subdivision..This will slow traffic and allow a safe place for childten to cross the street. Since , Paul Sullivan 1900 N. Peytonville RED MAY 0 71998 t c�c . 4.14- rY .! Sandra and Gerald Edelman 922 Turnberry Lane Southlake, Texas 76092 May 5, 1998 Dear Planning and Zoning Committee, I am writing regarding the Coventry Park Addition off of Leads drive. I have a concern about the additional traffic through the area. I would like to recommend that the construction traffic be rerouted to Peytonville via Dove Road. Turnberry Lane is becoming increasingly dangerous with the increased traffic load. The design of the road encourages speeding and when cars are parked at the curve vision is obstructed. (lbw In addition, the developer should ensure the new homes are part of the Coventry Manor Home Owners Association since the development will • benefit from the park etc... The developer currently lives in Coventry Manor. I would like to ensure he does not conduct his construction business from his home since this adds to the current traffic problem and congestion in the area. Sincerely, L RED MAY 0 71998 SA -1 . 05.20i95 14:47 FAX 214 712 9540 COOPER & SCULLY. P.C. 002!003 La" COOPER, ALDOUS & SCULLY Duccr Line: (214)712.9506 May 20, 1998 VIA TELECOPtER NO. (817) 488-9370 Chairman and Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Proposed Waterford Park Subdivision Dear Chairman and Committee Members: I am writing this letter to let you know my thoughts regarding the new proposed (111re Waterford Park Subdivision. By way of background, my family currently lives in the Coventry Subdivision, however, my office is in Dallas and I practice law everywhere. Because my family's needs have changed, in the event this new subdivision is accepted, more than likely I will look for a lot in that area. In evaluating whether or not I would want to purchase a lot in this new proposed subdivision, I have taken the time to perform due diligence on John McFarland, the primary developer. My investigation has revealed that John is a very reputable developer and certainly has a tremendous amount of experience in developing similar subdivisions. I have further contacted John, have met with him, and have reviewed his proposed plat for the subdivision. While I know there have been concerns by this Commission regarding earlier attempts to develop this subdivision, I am satisfied that John has taken great care in preparing this plat to ensure 1-acre lots and has taken the time to address all concerns of those who may live in or around this new proposed site. While I too am concerned about the traffic that currently exists in Coventry Manor, I am not convinced at all that this new proposed Waterford Park subdivision will exacerbate the problem. I further do not think that requiring a stub-out at the back of the new proposed subdivision will do anything to relieve the traffic that passes through Coventry Manor. The traffic that passes through Coventry Manor is primarily traffic that comes from the opposite side of this new subdivision site and cuts through to 114 and other widely used streets. The new proposed subdivision simply will not reduce that traffic. The only thing that will reduce that Att,r4r7s — A Projrssio1iat Cor,a•atioa Fuunders Square 900 Jackson Suter.Suite 100 Dallas.Texas 75202 Telephone 214.712.9100 Fax 214.712 9540 Sherman Office 903.S13-3900 RECD MAY 2 0 1998 gk-(0 Pa* Ic-F • 05'20/98 14:47 FAX 214 71: 9510 COOPER & SCULLY. P.C. ZI 003i003 L Chairman and Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission May 20. 1998 Page 2 traffic will be the creation of more than one way to get from Peytonville to Shady Oaks Boulevard, and/or White Chapel and/or 114. All in all, John has been very professional in attempting to address the needs of everyone who may be impacted by this new proposed subdivision and has taken great care in developing his plat. I strongly recommend that you accept his proposed plat for approval. With best regards, scoff Surnmy SS:plb at2%D LP, REC'D MAY 2 0 1998 L May 19, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Southlake, Texas 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 re: ZA 98-036 Dear P and Z Commission, As property owners at 955 Brittany Court, we are strongly opposed to any development, rezoning, platting or re-platting that includes the possibility of a road being constructed designated as Brittain Drive. This road would run right next to our property and would cause us the loss of a number of large trees, loss of safety and security by having a road running so closely to our property, loss of property value, and the loss of the quality of life that we have worked so hard to obtain and protect. Opening this road would create more traffic problems in addition to those already being experienced in the Coventry subdivision, and it would benefit no one on Brittany Court. We are strongly opposed to it ever being constructed. �Thank you, J. Scott and Brenda Mattheis 955 Brittany Court Southlake, Texas 76092 Y 211998 y��'pMA May-21 -98 09: 52A John havens P.01 (ism, 1303 Wakefield Court Southlake. Texas 76092 May 2I. 199$ Planning and Zoning Commission 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake. .l exas 7609'2 Re Preliminary Plat of Waterford Park Addition Dear Commissioners- We are opposed to "Alternate B"of the above-referenced project. More specifically. we arc against the road running north into the Rougenxmt property (between lots 5 and 6). We realize that there is a road arca designated ot}of Brittany Court (Brittany Lane) that could adjoin this proposed Waterford Park road. l lowcvcr. this area between the Mathcis and 0-Conner properties on Brittany Court has never been utilized . We believe that constructing a road at this point would serve no purpose except to devalue these properties. cause.unsafe traffic conditions. etc. We see no benefits to the City of Southlake versus the impact on the Brittany Court homeowners We would hopc that the owners and/or developers of the Waterford Park Addition would approach their project in a more neighborly fashion. Adhereing to the present Land Use Plan is greatly appreciated, however_ we see no benefit in disrupting the present situation that exists on Brittany Court. Also,the Rougcmont property should be given strong consideration as well since they are being so severely impacted by this project. The owners have been great residents of this community and we would hope that their lives will not be terribly disrupted. Preservation of trees should also be strictly enforced. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter MI;ye. �f/' .lc l�C(/11Pi 10_, Caroline Havens L Z.4f4,40—. n M. Havens L IC'D MAY 211998 5A -13 . r / .."...jt I i : `\ -- . \\ ,..."..,...."..' \ , ' ;--...—.----------'s ! / \ \Z....". \\ L \ , , .. . , \ ., . ... ., • • ... . , . . „ , „, , , \ \\ \ \ \ \ \‘‘, \ . \ \ ,\\ its,1-1 ,---- 4iffiztt i , , ! 1 1 L i \.\ , . 1 I I 1 i ---.4 d 1 1 1•--- c I.,) 1,,1. IiI:1%eI t-A11N 1-Am1'' I1.1 ,. 0I,•0 11 o .•, ••.•.. - k • i1,,'11•, .,. \, Estt- — eali‘l'f I vct."11031? 6 . t• r , I , 1 1 tv.Z*142 I.'. 1..111.%-:,,T___-_ , , 1 , Fota-i ..,.„ goGEI 'r _I , \ ak. , 1 gotia9134I \ \\\ \ s' ., ... : 2;1 , .,,,, , _,.;4.„ :, )(,--:' ,,,..... _ ast,...--'It., • ,- 1 ! ,, 1 il t flf r : . [ [ [ 1 [ : [ • f [, • [ - 1..r,3—, i 1 ! i i ., --, 1 1 i___, ; ; ; \,:...,..1.,,ri.1..,! , , -7—:----., •-• PO- •, -64 I ..,c' ts-c N.,- H-4i, ,___: •• i , i ,! 1 i -Hi 1 11 1 ,, -- --,.;.____; • t4t4 1 I ma,,Irli_Ak - --;I 111 4 ---;-, . • 4.1 iraii i ; - RNIta4N°1‘\\ \,.....N.....L..,...-;..-7" It ! I , ,1 1 I,, ,-,/ ...`f-:-------. ''" '' . , C LI ! I \ : 30--' V li q r . 140E5_ \ \ / ----; I ! , i I 1 •-• )-----Li---/..„\_,----., --\T.--‘31" 1 \ 1 ti---1 i 1 li„TRACTI MAP 1 DRAM a 1 \, (/ iv,7171Fiteerli \I SCHOCL 1 1 _L____,. .--. i 1 tIIII / ! Ii .• .. • U i Q m o _Q I Z O I Q 13 N301:1d9 : �O Q • La Q J o Q K m �V CI 0 0 Q D I � w u., lL V = Z 0 F N F.. m< d c7 » Iw ; aI-Lu g a N • D- err O Cr) o U CC I. I . CL -W ` c Y N Er Q .4. 0V.71 ga. 0 1It 1 (.11 n ;� Q h 1kl Cc / '' NI . � �� Q0? U U 2' i NI aL 0 , w> A Y Q a) Slid Li f c to a' O O.J [r R / 2- V� cu W •I ce Q c0zVa ,Cj -jz Z W o— Z cc s Z} 0 cr CN 0 W N m(..) < Q H ANY 1l9 '{ O0. O • s� U Q 0 Z CL CL Y � Q Q Ca rncc) J Q _ QVI . H 0 /—co 1- , N Z IA1 Q F- N 0 0 U C a. Z i w O IC Q CC I- _ .. ►-I 1- F' m o O J N �a�� • �,o�,3�no� % • etON ilif AWL1 N3A 1 • o I" w O Z Q J J De _ W 1 C"IO O Q) >_ r w< •1— C U ••J J 0 O tb -1 I u,Q �_ s - Y — I Q ti T H 9 R. p J 03 = N � _ I I I U • 3 ~ co 3 1 1 in N N I. £ U N v/ O - 1 Ill Q = N N WI 1 N Ra go f3A-15 x 03 O • City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 98-036 Review No: Three Date of Review:5/29/98 Project Name:Preliminary Plat-Longwood Addition (previously submitted as Coventry Park Addition and Waterford Park Addition).being 32.1701 acres of land in the T.Beedy Survey.Abstract No. 72.including Lot 1. T. Beedy. Abstract No 72. as recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 3586.PRTCT and all of Lots 2 and 3. T. Seedy.Abstract No. 72. as recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 3775.PRTCT APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Kingdom.Park Development j-Iawrylak&Associates. Inc. 5438 West University Boulevard 5300 W. Arkansas Lane Dallas. Texas 75209 Arlington. Texas 76016 Phone: (214) 357-0231 Phone: (817) 429-0220 Fax: (214) 357-0232 Attn.John MacFarlane Fax: (817)429-0220 Attn. Bob Hawrylak CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/27/98 AND WE OFFER,THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT.862. 1. A street stub into the north property line is required per the Subdivision Ordinance,Section 5.03.K.1. The property to the north is currently platted as a single lot(Lot 1,Block 1,Rougemont). This plat proposes a 26' Common Access and Utility Easement in lieu of the street stub. NOTE:Although this provides an additional means of drive access to the north property,the C.A.E. does not satisfy the public street stub requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance. Should the property to the north subdivide,the C.A.E. does not provide the necessary public street frontage. 2. The following changes are needed regarding the proposed lotting: a. Provide the minimum 100'lot width measured at the required minimum 40'front building line. Proposed Lots 2,3,4,7, 8,and 9,Block 2,do not appear to meet the minimum requirements. The applicant has proposed a 70'front building setback line for these lots and the lot widths measured at the proposed setback lines are 100'or more. b. A 40' building setback line is required on both street frontages for corner lots. This plan proposes a 30' building line along the side yard adjacent to Leeds Drive for the following "Back to Back"lots:Lots 1, 5,6, 10 and 11,Block 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council can approve a reduction to a 20'building setback line along the side street for these lots. c. Provide side lot lines radial to the cul-de-sac. Lots 2, 3,4, 7, 8 and 9 have deflections in the side lot lines. L:\COImIV W-PILS8\RUV\98\98036P43.WPD Page 1 SA-14O 1 City of Southlake,Texas 3. Provide easements for water,sewer and/or drainage in accordance with plans as approved by Public Works. 4. Staff recommends that the applicant relocate utility easements adjacent to right-of-way rather than along perimeter lot boundaries where possible,preserving existing trees. 5. Include all ownership deed references in the preamble of the metes and bounds description. 6. Provide labeling indicating that all surrounding properties are L.U.D. =Low Density Residential. 7. Revise the water, sewer and drainage plans to conform to the current plat/lotting configuration. 8. Label the lot number on the graphic for what would appear to be Lot 3, Block 2. 9. Label the cul-de-sac radius for the R.O.W. of Leyton and Laurel Court. * No lot within this addition shall be allowed driveway access onto North Peytonville Road. * A plat vacation on each of the existing platted lots must be processed through the City and filed of record in the County prior to filing a final plat for this development. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: John MacFarlane,Kingdom Park Development Via Fax Above Bob Hawrylak,Hawrylak&Associates,Inc.,Via Fax Above (owl L:\QOIDEV\UP-TILES\REV\98\98036PP3.NPD Page 2 . SA-17 • :fisi: 411 lii sii el -!.i•j t_ iy 21i1 til i•• 1. SE a 1Li ; i t' _ : �' �i - viz,--:it:. i.. , f.1 _r. : . 1 i"Fiii mists. s. tv.: I 0 t ''i=i ii.Hi 2.,: 1-.i Isi• '_silt !J ! !! J ! i : ill :31 t! !!l !i!! ! i ;l _ =t ! ill 3! : 1li isn - si: 1 i- : t-:i s 11 :: t" t i s J q -•s;: �_tigss •�!: •i ls:l i i!! :.31 #= =.i pi ., s Q. O 1- !vs 3i :i :;t- :is it t1211 : _si =_i--'s .. ::. a a, , t Cr) i:'tie°cia•41=nl:i Oa! ;=I _ ! rgf sj 3 ! i_:311. 1u =t_i a ' Q• s ft C77 :wifiii:.-; i'is i II it„1i : •. i!-! :i I i--i-ti js : s cc o a `! t •l t*` '=• iv: 3 i-i !i ;!! 'I .J!' ,ia = s1.I� _ P. .;. .; (:) li-: ii- - i gC:! fill!' i-lie ,i pis.. ia: 1gI ifil E yyif" } o 1.i t v i, :.ls:a;111•7i=:s"e: Ifldi illi 1.:==.i 1i!1.. Ititiii 8ll:i=li F Eild I J cp`.at d 1-; SQ /'_ 4 .�� 1 ?-4 !5 O �� �Ysls 8 - i --J... '` '�" s. aarwr..+f•k a Eli CC ",_ Jarrx!1413011117 :c.... .2,..\\I 2 1 : /„ "..\41.k atimvs. _3/ 11.1�f -- /z_____,,__ Litr,s _--- 1 — 6 8 1:F -24 • !,!i S la : � 11i r.ty ii € til 1 t + V o r... 1 11 `i Ii. •'"" 11 ' is i 1 list . tA, ;, {e ,_ - --�....� x'� r ' s I :3 1r -_,, ,, ‘2 i rill: A..: 4.--7„............-,7 i _ iiilaittli i Li , it::: �.. : ly , 1 �- • = 3.li I .l 'In . (0, .E ' 1,----.- , I. i 1 I. , r I I 5 �: II 11 I_ it- .> 4 II �. of 1'. °Is II: 1 e t:i 4 I tl ay a i § I I t. - • I ; till i I �" Ig 6 1:1 a. I I k r I .1 -.•.,no,. I e y .. ;i I ` i . �. . R 1I `i •'O .I I . x° _ :0 la i . , 1 I V t iFA }= 7 A� y• �� rm 1 I k \' 'a �• 'j; f S € • r a r. i z. `'� i ' 4 : Yyl j- ti• =C., iiilri ,i bat Pa ff ' LLI 1— w:, it w ? `I .� .•i-. f 1_- 1 t _w I I s li. y=• ? IV J ',a ryl I • I I i to . " Kr • • t I I 6 I 1` _ 9 I ., RYr: T l JJlt � i • lit • C l.F { r y • -- d I-q,r t II " w8• - I a 1 v . I y r;' '7- Y i �I r- Fg 1 tg a- r'., 1 �. 'J el O.1 I it —I • 1 it , y 1 i II I -8 f Iii,r( ►` 1,e 4 N;g itr —t;—- I; � µ— 7a x��rs 7r� pis �•m'—i~--'- dv orou Atnra» � Ilj"•'- •• AL99. Z•DON7--3/W3Ad37Z4M01A3d HUM t • g .! t'' It 7 I% .% / *FM 1 i I' % I il II I I 41 15." ii it q—Fr— 1 at { c ! t City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-040 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-280/First Reading/ Rezoning and Concept Plan /Pine Meadow Estates STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as being approximately 8.404 acres situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 525 and being Tract 5A1. LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of Shady Lane and North Kimball Avenue. OWNER: Virginia L. Yeargain APPLICANT: K.S.L., Ltd. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen(14) RESPONSES: Two (2)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Hazel Miller, 5213 McQuade Street, Fort Worth, Texas, in favor of (Received 5/18/98) • Molly Stegall, 890 North Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Traffic on North Kimball is already very heavy. Seems like a lot of houses for the space." (Received 5/22/98) • Marianne McAllister, 1008 North Shady Lane, Southlake, Texas, opposed. See attached letter. "From the information provided, the lots will be substantially smaller than those in existence on both Shady Lane and the Pattersons' property it will adjoin." (Received 5/26/98) P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1,dated May 15, 1998, deleting Item#3 (35' building setback) and accepting the applicant's agreement regarding fencing. City of Southlake,Texas STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, with the exception of those in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 29, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-040ZC.W PD L = /')-, —r-Trr---c0(s'iz.--vr, ] —,H _ , , .--1___J m W E /7 .71 00 ‘411—.—e— ,\ W � � ~ S1 ASS \r, U 1 1 1 Z S J JJ7w� � � Ci- Q P1�+CE f A S c a l e — 1 ":lO' .\ I ! �� — N� , NnlJl�4f11' ' e p Ii it 1 ■ k, _. /1 II \ L-__7 1, it.r.1 - 0 GPM " R ��°. ' Lle I1 Oa H I ON wilt ,, i ,_, ,61c, *11.11fA 1' II . � ni Ell Imo•Maut _. 111,. 1 /\ ,---' 1 / ,wrzeigi.-- lk, S AOS ^10r Ns � \ pK��FAST IWI , . , c 4� ram_ , -___5-1 — 4\ r TRACT MAP j ,, • MI III 2P -3 ...�■ I / irfl 1) 14 15 16 17 18 19 DA 22 27 . . 1 21 11* . . • TR 2A3 I 13 1A 9 12 11/� pif,A 8 7 6 5 IR (arme 4 AC I 3 1 IIis • Illhi . . CRIPPLE CREEK TR u 1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 . . I. IS 1 1 • i 13\ 12 11 10 9 8 6 W2900 - - - - - - - - �� 14 I� MESA VERDE TR '• 21 1 / 1 III 2 2 1 t Il GRAPEVINE CITY LIMITS 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 —f- - e.---C --1— . . . . one _._. _ . ._. . rn S. MCMANUS 1 SHADY LANE • -%� 1 : � . � 9 TR 5D2C TR 2C S' „AG„ I r M. CHICK ,1 __ TR 5D2 7.553 1 "S F-1 A" • H. MILLER HANNJ4 A „ J. MOYER G • 1 • TR 5D2B • F. RECORD'-- ‘1 TR 5D2B1 '' 'NR—PUD" I M. MCALLISTER WESTERRA SOUTHLAKE LP. 1 • TR 5D3 2A4 1.5 AC M. STEGALL I C. PATTERSON J. WRIGHT .ram i f TNION TRANSPORT TR 5D4 I TR 5E1 V WORKERS L. SHERWOOD UNION #513 -' ) "0-1 II I / TR 5A2 TR 50 r < B AC .77 AC TR 28 "AG" 1 1.6 AC TR 5D1A �`. 2.07 AC r —N 111 .\....._.) ---_ 5 i` ADJACENT OWNERS -- TR 5C:B TR i 1. 15 AC 3.c / AND ZONING f—se TR 3 1 AC / a A1 4 Al' ( 1 I 0-4/ I Re: P&Z Meeting, 5/21/1998 mailbox:/C%7C/Program%20Files/Nets...gw006.irngtc.tel.gte.com&number=37 Subject: Re: P&Z Meeting,5/21/1 8 C pn r>n 12)_elik/ Date: Thu, 21 May 98 13- . CDT Le From: "Marianne M ister" <marianne.mcallister@telops.gte.com> To: <cewings@ci.southlake.tx.us>, <ke14192@gte.net>, <tward2481 @aol.com> P&Z Commission, Remarks/Observations for May 21 meeting: I wish to register my objections to the proposed zoning/concept plan for Pine Meadow Estates (98-040) . >From the information provided, the lots will be substantially smaller than those in existence on both Shady Lane and the Patterson's property it will adjoin. We DO NOT want to duplicate Para Linda Estates. While in concept I have no major problem with a housing subdivision, I do have the following questions: 1) What will the dividing line consist of between the existing and proposed properties; 2) What is the proposed square footage for the proposed new homes; 3) What is the average values of the proposed new homes; 4) Where will the new properties tie on to the new sewer lines, Kimball or connect through the Shady Lane properties. If the Shady Lane properties, specifically where? (lawe Thanks! Marianne McAllister 1008 N. Shady Lane Southlake, TX 76092 H - 817/481-2300 REC'D MAY 2 61998 1 of 1 �_ 5/22/98 2:57 PM • City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 98-040 Review No: Two Date of Review: 5/29/98 Project Name: Concept Plan - Pine Meadows Estates. Being 8.404 acres out of the Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: K.S.L.. Ltd T.L. Thompson 4835 LBJ Freeway, Suite 850 1400 W. Euless Blvd.. Suite 102 Dallas. Texas 75244 Euless. Texas 76040 Phone: (972) 385-3310 Phone: (817) 267-9269 Fax: (817)424-0884 Fax: (817) 571-7959 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. 1. Relocate the 6'brick wall outside of the 10'bufferyard and utility easement along Kimball Avenue. The wall must also be placed outside of the visibility triangle required by the Subdivision Ordinance at all street corners. 2. Show and dimension the right-of-way dedication in accordance with the current Master Thoroughfare Plan (Kimball Avenue 94' Arterial, 47' from centerline). The dedication shown near the northwest corner of the development is less than the required 47' from centerline. 3. A 35' building setback line is required on both street frontages for a corner lot. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council can allow a reduction to a 15' building line along a sideyard adjacent to a street for"Back-to-Back lots. The applicant has requested a 25' building line along the side yard adjacent to Kimball Avenue for the following"Back-to-Back lots: Lots 5, 6, and 14. (P & Z Action 5/21/98:Allow reduction of building line to 25'along Kimball.) 4. The sidewalks should extend to the existing and/or proposed pavement of Kimball Avenue and should be constructed to meet accessibility standards. 5. Correctly show the property west of this site,across Kimball Avenue. TAD maps indicate the Hanna property is further north than shown on this plan. Revise the L.U.D., zoning and ownership accordingly. 6. Correct the written scale shown below the graphic scale. The correct scale is 1" = 50'. 7. Provide a subdivision and street name not similar to any other subdivision or street within Southlake. The name"Pine Meadow"Court already exists. (.,iP&ZACTION: May 21, 1998;Approved(6-0)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, amended as noted above. City of Southlake,Texas * No lot within this addition shall be allowed driveway access onto Kimball Avenue. * This review is based on the "SF-20A"District Regulations. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: K.S.L. Ltd Via FAX Above T.L. Thompson Via FAX Above Daniel M. Long,P.E. Virginia L. Yeargain 121 Harmony Lane Dallas, Texas 75065 L:\COMDE V\W P-FILES\RE V\98\98040C P2.W PD • 8�- • \•' . . 1 • \......____ • . i .. • lit ,..) , ..--- ---- - - - 3 -----z-r•-• 3 t : a,-; • l'• i 3 V -V ....s i tIX li ifr a. ./,., \ / i:Iit if:174i (160, i• :1 I !! 1,1. 1, ! :. 3 li 1%1 iul • r.: i , ,I •1 11/f I:41111i oct4 ' • s .. INT) III atu ..". -•-. // ; 35 It• i :. g A ocr) " tri 4 g .....:!. 2 +' 1 • • / I 1 . i-.• g 1 .,...- r-• / ' .-.); , / .. . . d.. I ' , li • • .-' -13Z3Zg i -'1:44 .4 C%2 ;J,110 d•-•, to,:; g••••••;'''' i re,: • -. .•i.;1-' ' ..:' ;" ''' ' - 2 .:..":-....i owyeta....co.-Alo Ct I • ,,?''..y y • co ...- .i . ... . si if iP •• 7:34 .. -41 , • ';'; I • • .3 i- ; k« h - I' 7 •Pp e"--7--A- -....31, 1 I / p 1 _:- .0 I , . 0 , -:.,.,- • .'I • 1 S id 1 '-'; i Ilat All /1 ?..'A . i -r:^- '• I r 1 I .... %,....,t .±..' rii4. /,,, i %: s ' '3 v•-••• , •*. . "-• lei 1!,i rail - I. I:1. i 8 - SI'66 4'7 I • _ 62SHP i/1.81,,I .IOS 7.":•/1.ISA9.1t . *$ 06) . _ 9166 . - -ig. 4" i - -..`• 1 1 , ' \r1;1110b0.! 1 : • ' ,/i . (4 '' i C. CU 0) -Y - § A_ L. ..." .,. ,i, t - ra‘:. •),, V .G o-s' :. :Th.c.i *-- ‘1\\. - -, - ,!' cu 4. C f. ,4:4 0 3 1 •2 ---- t9a. al Of .4. VA /s\.. ....., k .!* 6E1,91 to c.; co, • ;.... ,•.•_ •••. ' t, .4,. "" II: -co _...- _ a, . • v, ,..-.• i -,,,:t.si:‘ . ,26. 7 41 4 • % - tn .P'‘ .41-11 ) 11 I"' 65- < Oty « 0 3 3 i CU - I - T ! / CU ii... 6.9 ;''-- § 3 •tI 0 il .i. • ta. A ‘.1) ' ' ' / 160.00 •.."- --;1."' r- .7.68 . . ;‘,1 0 \i I 1 -r.)it _ v) i- 00t4./SiE • . . 1 • In '' ' ,.„:„; c. 4,8. ....., ..,.. ., •. ....., a , I, .,7' M -. c:, co -1 6 1 ig ' '. • IC.. I ". in I ie . •TC q " :' :. , II. .max. ---C, g'', II r 1..., !!, gni a M ''..:,4: c Pt i•t.r -.. - i . .-... 1' 1 • •11 1 g. : 149.441i I i• 1 ...1k g I - , L.L, ggi d ss-viTs o •S...t !C;•.••• .._. •--ot.i"gi a - N gl ici , P".. 1U I. 160.00 - ..,. a CL d I- .• • I 3 • 1,170.91 m ,. . . S .!% ,.:,,, 4.> o - • 11•= '..':-.3?. . . . t k - li . Ir l'i 3 . -4 o_IRO-- la: v .. ' tti . .•-• 5... 'Q.. r•-•. if r ti il ,.., „I r,:.; .11 . 1 c,- . . . ,,,, 9 ., u 4-2 A* '. ' ' ' . ' 1. " 3. ' -7277 . .., . i e iii - 1 - (. , .5 , -- .. . 174.08 or vi a ..1/ IV 1. 1,4 -',-.! - D -,. Al r. 149.44 ,11 9. . I Cu 11 gl 6 rl 7 160.00 22 ••, 0 I 0, 1.3 • 4, Z vi 3 C 0 ••S r b 0 le, .•F. A /I - . ti. i kr,' I t t.. :-.., f., ii i • ,,..• I- . .0 kl . 1.,:-, ir I • ''' 8• : .. -: A • I 1 Ch *1 i J f's •\. i , - . .... g, el s :„ A t -.:". -". kt.........1„, 1 • Cu ... . do am 0•••*0 '• .' i ,,, L, 431ftliiillUa 441 ir -''• - - - 3 ......-a,..w......r.. ._-:-_..,,,tw_. '.1.1 -''''''7"--:-..""1".=..;.•---- - .•.--"^ -6.- --------f------ 11,.-• _ -"7 ''. .,"----- 0 inanloo among:-72112142•5 . '4:7'.7_=72.. =L. --- sm.4••••••s 1-> oc....M.•:=.4.oe":7---=-..- /2413Ac .Hamm --rbs___ • _ _i_.3.2.G,94,60N:, _`1,.._-±L'aralf-- ••••••-qi.1:•••=•..i.1‘..1.•.".1- 1 , tb ( i• t :So Is I 0, I F•• e 1 ▪ s . g Ft . .... w 2 .,..:. ;4'. . 1 ; • -I 1 - . 1 I " 4.. U 3 S. tit-a /... *ig V i 1 3-8 '.J ..-.t,11.1. ....• 4 ..;."._1-,de ..1 :1 I k :.! . . it ' . • •••%•-•.' •••••••• ..... • IS D; 7..i:‘:-i''1:«11 \•• ca)ro .. i 009 I - . 1 I '' ' s i•-; (?) . 8 ''',,,,ii....f-;tr. • li fl. . ....., .' -:../ $n i •:ii:' U-kr _ g -.., 4‘ A' JH i II} 1 IP" t., • -1 lis \ za•a 3:111 lai S. 1 1:: ;;;•11 5 1 :%. g. gi g 1 , 1-': wt-.- g ; • • :S. w do a; rj ;i.,. % -- i 1 if 2 > : .; 1;Jiyi i :1! li II i ll 1 .. 11 a : :8i i : ik"t:. • c'.-.,•,."._;;--'','-,i.F7".,D-4,-Za.,.i.!.. \, , ... g i.../ g Cts •• : -. • 51.• til,, .-3 -• : .• in kg I -f.,4 i 1 il ='•. ' 11 1/t -0 4 -t 1;?* • 4 =2 --• 4 1 \ 1- 1%ii lit 7: -;$ .,511 its l• - -:: 3 .. - -a •.11 ,. jay • L.- :ip :4-k11 -III i1 11 f-5 ii4 2. I: AZ k".1 tal.2 A .•: t:* t. tiz t".: 1.111 ila ' 1- 13 s i.3 -3a ` . 5t4 ' t• - •'WI 88:s -11, lIsi 851. :V4 .:..1zEig 0%st :4 25.1 :1.: f a rold ' g 1 i iisi -1` -.. 5 1 ir Ili • rat Is'. 11 3 i• "r,/ *11 . 1 5 i• 3 - 4• • : ..,.. • grIk 1 4 ;8 11111: '11 '... l' 1 - lis ililif Al 1 li 1:. 1!! IgilZ Itilifi 1! I 1 . ei3 - e • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-280 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 8.404 ACRES SITUATED IN THE SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 525 AND BEING TRACT 5A1, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG"AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-20A" SINGLE FAMILY :RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT-1AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and G:\ORD\ZO N I NG\480.145 Page 1 Q Q WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a (Iire public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: (110., Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 2 g-8 "U of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately 8.404 acres situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 525 and being Tract 5A1, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 3 shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until fmal disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 4 CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C (awl G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I45 (lure EXHIBIT "A" The following described tract or parcel of' land situated in the S. FREEMAN SURVEY, A-525, Tarrant County, Texas. and being the same tract as recorded on Page 69 of Volume 6484, in the Tarrant County, Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows! COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of the Parra Linda Estates, an addition to the city of Grapevine, Texas, recorded In vol. 388-152. pg. 67, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 88 degrees 50 minutes 54 seconds West a distance of 93.97 feet; THENCE South 01 degrees 31 minutes 48 seconds West, at a distance of 445.29 feet; THENCE South 00 degrees 46 minutes 51 seconds West, • a distance of 99.15 feet to the Point of Beginning of the herein described tract; • Le' BEGINNING at a found 1/2 inch steel rod at the Southeast corner of said tract as recorded on Page 69 of Volume 6484 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being the Northeast corner of an 8.0 acre tract as conveyed to Cart Patterson by deea recorded on Page 83 of Volume 7568 in the Tarrant County Deed Records; THENCE West, at a distance of 617.5 feet a found 3/4 inch pipe in the East, line of Kimball Road, a total • distance of 638.05 -feet to the centerline of said Kimball Road; THENCE North 00 degrees 26 minutes 52 seconds East along the centerline of said Kimball Road a •distance of 595.73 feet to a P.K. nail set; THENCE South 85 degrees 27 minutes 09 seconds East, a distance of 648.68 feet to an 'X' cut in concrete; .THENCE South 01 degrees 31 minutes 48 seconds West, nt '4 'distance of. 43.55 feet a fence post, continuing a - tdtQt distance of 445.29 feet to a found 1/2 inch steel rod; THENCE South 00 degrees 46 minutes 51 seconds West, a distance of 99.15 Feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing- 8.404 acres or 366,073 square feet of' land. G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 6 Le S'- EXHIBIT "B" �_ " x11 ice- — s : a // / \ . -c. fi :;F 1i n^✓ z c 1 V5. = g—= - jI I i // x 1 i o Wg 1 ,g / F + ; W ta: rF 51'66 * 1 sg F /. ` ----: 62 Sbb I/k,8b,I i0S ",/'1,iSy4 r 1 { , 0c9 J .F\, 62'681 • "y A N m O N inr }J 0 0Y al, 1 rt�i m t • a \ N `9 c ç T3p V- N N Q 3 0 Izs.s� ,• "'s� I m N :I! / /n N 11'1 Ir `; `/ Ng I i .768 ti 1 p .a I'I t,_ P o m I , ,; H eo O ®v7«`0; ' I 0.o g _ r r N S r L I o Y. oo N N l��U a 3 I: ' °'5 i'I �iid I�; 0 m It9.41AI { lr' fill: ® C $"c' 0, L . . • If _ ; :'"II ~ 12 170.91 �� I le 160.00 n- 0. a cb 1visi ? I I v-o n o //p� is 1.1. _. — - I o r N •I� { 'V .11`.1 o N O \ • V t7 S 5'a fig _ ..I I I I N 1,19.44eb. N p Fs hi:: g\ Nil' i 17408 1 1^ ��� a 16000 Z • U dd� .b °yy§u• i •)I 1 _ tI i 4 Lei :"Al .I c" t5 sags2Y E I •, nS o y v� II "• ':ui'^ 3 : ? v .n � Fii \ - ,,I �` g t 2 to o . .1-• m � �1 I 'A 31 . N m ; � a ^d in 1 a) • 1 N •a N - a • .n'>Nvro.0 1 y \I I-• I ;,ter a" Lr '" ° F -1.--- uS ,1 n-wa°`3.a----_ .U-7— --- .._ 62n^ — N d 1 to $9 c :„.. —) Op9 kWE 'Es 9a "I I • rnv N o \ \ 0 L I. --4C , x e, •r z¢s _I11 nw � i ip ab : 4 j ii i' �-i ` k ` . .as s 3; . gb1. 3O V 99 a il ; j1 a;,• s, t ; ;F Sy` 5 $ R ia = .'0 o f 1i 15 .f e$ na 3 ': b" 2T F'6'c a e° El'e. 4S,. h.. F3yi_ �` i1 SAS .:: Ili O - '::7:7: r4.14. 2... It ja J.: ,.. -i :.1,. )0: I. i., i•d fi'i j c > . i .< i.itzir.. Xi1,1 IZS X. Y:5! Y:5 8a-l5 City of Southlake,Texas LP' STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-041 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat-Pine Meadow Estates STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat of Pine Meadow Estates on property legally described as being approximately 8.404 acres situated in the Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and being Tract 5A1. This plat proposes 14 residential lots. LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of Shady Lane and North Kimball Avenue. OWNER: Virginia L. Yeargain APPLICANT: K.S.L., Ltd. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District (kir' LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen(14) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Hazel Miller, 5213 McQuade Street, Fort Worth, Texas, in favor of (Received 5/18/98) • Molly Stegall, 890 North Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Seems like a lot of houses for the space." (Received 5/22/98) One(1)response was received from outside the Southlake city limits from a property owner in Grapevine: • Rodney Boney, 2807 Roaring Springs, Grapevine, Texas, opposed. "1) Because of traffic that Kimball Road carries on it already. 2) Because of the other subdivision on Kimball is just now being built and added to Kimball which is a mess." (Received 5/18/98) P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Approved(6-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, deleting Item #3 (35' building setback) and understanding that the applicant may change his sewer easement (6••• location. EC- 1 City of Southlake,Texas STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Plat Review Summary No. 1,dated May 15, 1998, with the exception of those in Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated May 29, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-041 PP.WPD Lae, SC-2 7/ \ L-Iniior-, i—dtIc' r--- 11 , ) i ) 17,__ Ton 5 W -- 111111111111-igipp..-- E \40 1 H. ... i —. .! ! --1 ‘.1 HollikrIji >_ \ ‘Esi ,j\::::\i . ,___H, 1,. IlLtilisi. LLI-1— ,s 1 \ \ ,› , . • ! Tol,vt- z. S , ,, Id- i ----, ce 1 0 Scale = 1 ":10 , -IN • 1 n------i i ,4;104 ..,,, r___ r--1 , 1 ._ ,, ,i, 'I.4.1 1111 SI , 1 1 i5 ni 1 , /7 1 • it ______ RAIMIEFta I i ,> I I -- 1 . >- VP r f I 1 ; ____1 i - ....i Roam' • FT\-- -_,...___Stajla:CS 71 :--- 1 .4 I L\ .. Lr- .. .•*AZ. I 1 7\ - 1 p / ---tiFtEFiz w.. , il I / Si°VP4---2r‘ I 1 1 1 1 ; ikcPcS \ 1---1 ( NCRTHWE:ff PKWY EA./ST I , , Ca4° f gt5114 I . I 1 , . • I r I ; I i 44Pli'kt‘ , mgil 171 1 , .t. ..a• e'l:, IN TRACT MAP /./ ) / I .11 OC-3 i . ITT- Mangel ; ,--1 ' • 18 iI 14 15 16 17 27\ • DA2, 22 MO' L�9. TR 2A3 li 13 12 11 8 7 6 5 4 3 •-4 AC J A9 • 3 Il 1 llCRIPPLE CREEK TR u ii Elm 18 19 20 eiggilit 1 - - - - - - -:I IM 10 8 yr MESA VERDE TR '• C II�� it I I I 22 I' GRAPEVINE CITY LIMITS ' 29 28 27 26 25 24 ' 23 ,C S. MCMANUS r SHADY LANE ' _ 7` - - N I � TR 5D2C TR 2C ' N�N `.R • • 5.49 AC ' �����S�iTy "AG" �' �' . G t r � � M. CHICK ,1 \ TR 502 7.553 • 1 ��S F-1 A" ' L TR SDZA HANN4"AG" H. MILLER J. MOYER • TR 5029 H F. RECORD'-- .. �- TR 50291 "NR-PUD" I M. MCALLISTER WESTERRA SOUTHLAKE LP. , • TR 2A4 1.5 AC TR 503 M. STEGALL I C. PATTERSON J. WRIGHT • r TNIOIq TRANSPORT TR 5E1 V WORKERS TR 5D4 UNION #513 - L. SHERWOOD / ) "O-1II . . ..... TR 5A2 f�• • TR 50 7 I 8 AC 77 AC \....< •___.-----..,-- TR 29 I "AG" 1.6 AC TR 501A ,___- 2.07 AC \ -...,,..........‘ .\.__.) ---- L.\\•. . • , ADJACENT OWNERS - TR 5C19 AND ZONING 1 . 15 AC 1-f TR 3Lf 1 AC • 2 R All Ar I 1 1 �C' I City of Southlake,Texas . PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 98-041 Review No: Two Date of Review: 5/29/98 Project Name: Preliminary Plat-Pine Meadows Estates. being 8.404 acres out of the Freeman Survey. Abstract No 525 - APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: K.S.L.. Ltd T.L. Thompson 4835 LBJ Freeway. Suite 850 1400 W. Euless Blvd.. Suite 102 Dallas.Texas 75244 Euless. Texas 76040 Phone: (972) 385-3310 Phone: (817)267-9269 Fax: (817)424-0884 Fax: (817) 571-7959 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT.862. 1. Provide easements for water,sewer and/or drainage in compliance with plans as approved by public works. 2. Provide and dimension the right-of-way dedication in accordance with the current Master Thoroughfare Plan(Kimball Avenue 94'Arterial,47'from centerline).The dedication shown near the northwest corner of the development is less than the required 47' from centerline. 3. A 35' building setback line is required on both street frontages for a corner lot. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council can allow a reduction to a 15' building line along a sideyard adjacent to a street for"Back-to-Back lots. The applicant has requested a 25'building line along the side yard adjacent to Kimball Avenue for the following"Back-to-Back lots: Lots 5, 6, and 14. (P & ZAction 5/21/98:Allow reduction of building line to 25'along Kimball.) 4. Show and label the area embraced by tree cover. (Note: A tree survey is not required due to site inspection. Trees are located around the perimeter of the property.) 5. Correctly show the property west of this site,across Kimball Avenue. TAD maps indicate the Hanna property is further north than shown on this plan. Revise the L.U.D., zoning and ownership accordingly. 6. Correct the written scale shown below the graphic scale. The correct scale is 1" = 50'. 7. The following changes are needed regarding the legal description: a. Verify the internal lot dimensions. There appear to be some discrepancies in the total between the internal lot dimensions shown and the exterior boundary dimensions. L:\cOMDBV\NP-mas\IISV\98\98041PP2.NPD Page 1 QC City of Southlake,Texas b. The POB must be tied to a survey corner or previously filed subdivision corner. Provide the point of commencement. 8. Provide a subdivision and street name not similar to any other subdivision or street within Southlake. The name"Pine Meadow"Court already exists. P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998;Approved(6-0)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, amended as noted above, and understanding that the applicant may change his sewer easement location. * No lot within this addition shall be allowed driveway access onto Kimball Avenue. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: K.S.L. Ltd Via FAX Above T.L. Thompson Via FAX Above Daniel M. Long,P.E. Virginia L. Yeargain 121 Harmony Lane Dallas,Texas 75065 C C L:\COF®6V\WP-RLZ$kREV\98\98041PP7.NPD C. -( Page 2 I I / N • �_ ¢¢ s + _ 1 illR !!..1.:0F7 cr7't cr, 2(60" i'i g a^' m .i u . .uGi N .! s J ., N SiI 'y~ i ' 1 t11:Rs1: r.!4 P > If , I A L_.. J - 1 .1 ,..i i 1 . -1 ' 19 CY ..,' r 1 •% ; 62'Sbb /t.86,I8.IOS .IS 166 _ .� Oe i aCBdt _ _.._ a� a; i• o N �i O I p op N �" J �N S ` 3 E`3 �1rj N m 11t , _ m tAt0 3.9g1 —c :::1 J I 3.00.00.00N c a F-i • 1QQ6 s7 t li65 rte a 06 I I N o - 3.OD.00.00N\ t �^ N o d 4,3 k S o 1 / S00'00'00'E 03 IL •8 ( 6. ( 160.00 M >. . rn l I� I.. N T _.00 OON N 0 • I...•I 4. ; V" o � ®y O Y:N S A -' Z L W o 07...I r I o eS; ., is Ni C U„ •17. . w -- . G n cuo Y tu E. 2++i• P .7In I f O 0 SCd 149A1 I t N - ' Ngi E '6 0 i s... s o 0 c- 3.00.00.00N '0 0 i • t. >E>a .+,' �t1 I N ii ,0 S00'00'00'E • �. of .. - 170.91 t` 01•1. C i .. ,- I 3.00.00.00N anq to •I3 LI I l.. $ d, "I. 03.... , � H3 .+ a 1 t` ot� 1!$ji� ii1 'ta I- CI o �i N !'! I o o _ t49.1A n I 1 N p s b ; I N 3.00149.44 I I ® I I S00.00'00'E pt Y 174.08 160.00 t. Z 3 ; I • -34"°•oay� 6 I x� 1 I to 4 ,• ..\ 'i to ., 1 I o f 1I1g \ o o+ »� o a a< µ I a .�_ I g I N •d q \ N o ~ 71 it N In m �al;� J "+ N I I L� ._..uN es .aJ� i fl1 1 1 y - .w-ew►w u A t nlo�i'' 1.•0-.'.......1..iso'w'"u 1-a 7atd.!„ - S suinC�>r.__- „`�W C# • i "`x ''' 11-1 1 1 I 1 ` -a 009 1 i 'I , .............. :r:.,.!. ‘. i t I14 f • 11i ..E I 1. i 1 ! !; 4! .11;!! ig-it 8x,• d :. C, ,. . ,,:. lit . ,,,, i, ,g,,,. ..„ ..„ ,,, ..„.., 1SA se,;. ' I9 t' ;_, ti tti li: `a} :r.z • t r'S y : lit = sa sx #�/,le ." si; :: sa. 3g° • 2 . •' is } h.SStg A � � 2 SAYS i ; ie#�: aa S8! .. - - SC-1 Shades Lana_ 1 i ; I l'IA / . --- -- ,gr., Id -2, ' Y M . Coi _ N I41 L ram. / `- ra _ / ! tti .u /// 5 �JJ iI i / I I dL /./../ I I (YM Cr \ ... • i ii : I. i --; ——1 ---- sr•— _ _� ��S cr ., /� I 92•L9t 1 C." �� .. �� ....... 7.1.---) Q6s I I�d I` N mi 12&63( E 'x _ (/ 160.00 sit I It OLI �'.. •1 t 3 IA)._ f 1 a ;a ..).....n v� N N h,i N C'1 °�i' • N Iw iI :' 6- N IiN N OYd Y iY ie . _ _ d I anti 11 r 1. I; 160.00 c 52 L"2 igit I I IIr, Ili' If d o o��- (00, b ° 11N n Al 6 d 1 vas! S et_a — _ o,mg, � 1, ori_ L �_ 3d ,,, °b ICI, .-. 31 ._,1 •I3 �g N p: N al 5 I. C•€ • ° y III R • ..I' «R C� 1 >1z tlLa j ! t. t . 5 I I I 6C9L1 ; lSLSO �I ` I 160.00 • d �~ I"-" \ ,; II^ I i N ^E z FYI L s 3 [z3 srim,.ca I\ f g I . 'L�:_4.►.29Lr_L__---c_s►s1__---_, - L— 93.121-2.1 awing� g •IM1 Asps•4•N1.Of , — -- — — — — 71-1. iiwl,. I - _ ._.._.. .._ .• = 0 is 009 • s1g1 I ss • 1111 a s . 0ri M C , • N 4c-8 , a w 4i,1 _x 1 .• ,j — - - - - _— — t ap (,,„i-, . ,z <\,„,.._.. kp ` r - aN / s 3� ; °' // // • , pli i ,..„, .5-11 "..N2 / O? , CC / .'s 1,51. cL 14 / /, ' , it (1t \ . - / ii , I I -- . 11\I //i . e I N. C..7"/ _ r!..:11., I tI ¢ ;r o,� cr,0 as / . C. i .T I N .. 1 °�9 • I a ; 1 I I f d + I it / k..... l \ x s: m I ffi �••• c"� ag. N u d d r°x a — —Ill 1¢ ® iI ° I ° I N ��d:�t � d . :.�: _ .3 I A �g S� I �I Q 3 •+'•P s•; it'll(iii., 1 —. — 1.II al c A ICI' .. d cu C L o t i r r.. J k, . k Lsi C� sy I: I I d d o~=.s .a• \N mg = L nq.st1 I rw_q I- - — — ._. _..__ :-..., — :_.._.._ �.- 4 . ,r .t1 i` 10_ , 9 ° 00 - i a• S t . o r_$:: 'i II 11.. i t •AiI' (,,,,,, , . o . r • v U d • 0 ' :I 1 nv City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-045 PROJECT: Ordinance No. 480-281 /First Reading/ Rezoning and Concept Plan /The Woods STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as The Woods, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3432, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 17.083 acres. LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of Florence Road and Pearson Lane. OWNER: V.T. Cross APPLICANT: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty-two (22) RESPONSES: One (1)response was received within the 200' notification area: • B.H. Drake, 8220 Davis Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas, in favor of. (Received 5/21/98) P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, correcting the error on Lot 1, Block 2, acreage to be shown as 30,000 s.f.; and adjusting the common lot line of Lots 5 & 6, Block 2, to be common with the corner of Lots 17 & 18 of Vista Trails. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, with the exception of those in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 29, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-045ZC.W PD WESTLAKE CITY LIMIT Lsie KELLER CITY LIMIT (1..., kii E; ' j 5 1 1 1 I _____ . 1--- 4111 111114 I �. . FP c .� xf, ...rid Aim --- It =�, :. Pe34 (r ,_ :_ - .ram= :.. ir: Nv" RE .. . I .' ELEM. SCHOOLPAS ESQ F E-� -01111 - m 1105=111 L goo: , ::•-.' ] _i____ masismiem-0-114' \ TRACT MAP k-J I I No I ccitt v Y CO I- CO Z Y V .- V W p J V Q U (2 c _ W Q W tl o u_ Q LA< �Q LQ L� Q E < G>y 1� 0 LL F.- -I M M M Mst Md- M I Q be _ 0 `• H� a' pr * IY � Ir Ibe cc Q II i W 2ir- LU J W cc cc o CL N Q M V M Q lei Q L.` C Q _ U O O �< �N �r �- N Ii = uj a C7 =• Irk ' HM AIII -ZT - a I e N 01 CC WI `& W N W N N N CV d I V) Y_ I- II Lii trt I 2 Q I 2 a M N I a 0 I N j t� d. \ toto N I R Z v UJ Z 0 2I 2Z 'ZSIA �� m w r -co iii: Z o JI � NI a o °z Z N Q cc' a w LV en W" • w �ll 0 Z J -- co It) CO Y: 1 cplciL �, II Pit ICC II IIA 0 0 Q CN1 a o I, < ,� �) I re v) : ri cn 1- Ln O_ W N v yli II ''I t� `z, oar U .N- Cd CIO Cl) �r N•-) x a CO II 1 7 I 7 I I..LID aNWIHIf10S - - =-- . . - - .LID x�r�rmr - - - � �'i • • � • • SZINII'I IN- U Q ayIti r U ' �Q o r VI u� aw ��, g D -3 I • F :F _ _ ; Sainte I s 411 } L ;. ,.,. • • ; :=?; ;: i F: :i Ie : v i i -1 '_2 3 i is ' - _ : a s3 .. v3::: 112, li V •: i :F I 's - : a: f as:: 111 7 . r•.1 <I j io -• = 2 ,I: t .it-t--h El:1' i 'Y -• yeas, - -- _— : _t-_ al lsa;od 1 ana•,,+taa. I CL aosaNIM I I • I ..,.. .. ...e, :� . :f F L.L. i fn 11 L . ,, ,I :R I. .. : I. e}i» —; ; ; `.-e _ irvai%USIA I I_ I _!' 4. le w..,...•...a• Y o 8_ 1 � '� •o R •I: 111a(�++ 'j C 9 9 9 m i I: /+I��pYIIIl •i�+.. I, J ; �w'r i >' ,n�e.e• — IaNIM aii:A.V• �.C ii11: ~• z W o f:e ° „- (n w 7` ii_' — I;�=i111•_'ll�i 4 Jam■ :o 1 ` - D 1 i -�i s• _�u�lle�� _ F 0 I R i:a..-i' •:' cl."ut. iC IL . 8 » 6 qp 1 k 9 wuioi a L' . : ' xm t, I s. . f I is, q 3481 NOS8V3d 111 q;N 14 _: • '.I • ze 1 _ of . L _...... 9Z .,71._ .,.. ; i1 ! I a ,, :111: City of South lake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 98-045 Review No: Two Date of Review: 5/29/98 Project Name: Concept Plan-The Woods,being 17.083 acres out of the J. J.Freshour Survey.Abstract No. 521 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Fred Joyce - Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. Goodwin& Marshall.Inc. 1017 W.D. Tate Avenue 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100 Grapevine, Texas 76051 Fort Worth, Texas 76112 Phone: (817) 481-3516 _ Phone: (817) 429-4373 Fax: (817)481-4593 Fax: (817)446-3116 Attn. Bo Trainer CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 862. 1. Include the density in the site data(1.58 DU/AC). ce, 2. Show the location of proposed sidewalks. Sidewalks must be provided in compliance with the Sidewalk Ordinance No. 683. P&ZACTION: May 21, 1998;Approved(6-0)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, correcting the area of Lot 1, Block 2, to 30,000 square feet, minimum and adjusting the common lot line of Lot 5& 6, Block 2, to be common with the corner of Lot 17& 18 of Vista Trails. * No lot within this addition shall be allowed driveway access onto Pearson Lane or Florence Road. * Any new primary structures constructed on Lots 1 through 12,Block 1,and Lot 1 & 15,Block 2,shall face London Dell Drive. * Denotes Informational comment cc: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE Goodwin& Marshall, Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\REV\98\98045CP2.WPD C e\-S Obbl. 6 Min Ujitl . 2 NO II 22•la At 21 2.11222TA 1122.11.•l • AIWA L.— 17.—.{1____:;.. L..,,,, ...7..._ , . 5741 i (. , :•. :: „ n. J . _,i a f-L r i -,,a I 4'''. LI SV: J k.64461) ' in i I I la il iI1 I^N • • A'I! ' : ..:,i: 4! : 1,3 , !! :: .1 '' -,a I I,. r3 Jla aP - lir ' g 8 0 15 e mgll 1 i 8 is 11 N 0 ig.lig... 1 is : 1 :-.1, ....,-..,: ... l„. z.. 1 g 1 , „ ,,, .„.. I OH r,i: 1 -rii 3 I 1 ! 4,, 5 - t • 6 0 , ,, , , , , ! 1 , . , - ,go 101, I _3.1,0.1.8.005 . u 1 ,- i- - - 2 "4 • ',•‘-- • i- ' 1 " 1 • L ., r-----Mil-—-I ti. 2 :..0 I ... 0......3 t tvn..gratur,z ./..) ',/4. F.:11;•:, r_e, I 3 I CNI . :, , I i i cm .„.; 4,/ •.:,•:„ -1 •;;,.,1 „,1 ?, :', 41 i 1 ! z z 4 i ,r. */ - , •o% 4. ,,.A.; 6 1 d 1 2 • /- / •.:' '-•:'• 1 I g I c:r tI ' IC iii , / „/ _ a i'•::::-,, . 4 :1 a 1 Ir___..st, ______ i --. , / 0; I ti.1 '4.i .•:" ' 1 , ,•,;••i ,:•1'.\\ - 1 d - i ' I ) a i j IWILIMMISMES sougamatioatEr? 4 . r -1---, --(---( 3111 tilts al W __.,,......,...____ \ . . 1-92.21-----z- UE • \ 1 ., 1 V '. '' $; 8 I 2 pa II Ia 1 g 0 2 62 • I I 0 ! _ ii I V I 1 4 1 . ..ii.iala i 1 1 I r. a I , I i g;„ i 1 ili g . .1f11111 -:,,,, ..•,:-. 14 . i;•11..8. 11i-u . i 1 • "- : : :1:11 11 1 1 9 e•''.:' '',..•'‘ 05 i i 'q 2 /2NS;i 1 8 illINI i I 1 • 2 . : 1 Es 1 I t---, I i 12• ' I i ?•.,F.-• f i I 1 1Z'; r.J " 47 -; I I:k.: ' .311. 1.•. it se: ri ; / ..• / unamm i \, ,,, r........H.... ..o. 1 .\/ 1., i v I I , /` / •-.....--.., hi" r.; ,r. i 53 2 Lioi , . . a 3 x , —______ , ., ..,. , -.E S.251 41 P.2 2 ii 1 2::' •i: i: 1,..9 „,p, ___14. t. ..... - : -, ) 4 , I g oi ri, R. i ,... . .. 4 , ‘. , .*CA tr. ..;.2 -•' ^ r. :4C-4 i.3 2 35E ' ' ,. si 1•6 I 1 • 1 •, ,' '‘; -' 3 .'‘e ef. 111 3 .L.. .. '52 22 3••E .. .s .!.3 i I -tr a: .-•-: : •.5 5.5 •;•• ,‘, 3 %, .-z: 25 • 5 • 6 !.".' , . I i T ••••d. ,, t I \ , 4...,.., E S.,5'• • — - • cc% -=1 • I 7.11 .' I " I 1 47s%. L.: '2,11 EP" Pi gi2= 1 t IP .47 NI . . a Ili it.-g Pgtg Pi r rr 3-s: ;it a-st a, a BB as . 1 •., • I 4 r-5 •g •5* 6 I 1 : I 1 , : 04 92i•25;•• kg! 15 i ill 31 •AI • .32 i .1 11;a 1:1 I:1i Vis V VI;VI 3.E a=ili 1ali 1:1 Y7.1 11 ii /t 1 I I I .i 1 .i.• i M I .AIl r ..,, 11, i g 1 • a, - UJ pr/ . .., -1 =Ps! 111 10 al-il • iil! —t fa I 6 1 i - x ' II ... i 1 1 1 I I I .'-,•''' ':'1 z* g 3 .. ' j I: :1 4 *I 1 i6 I 3 I • Fl I ; I INT 1 ,.. i . sr V Yea .r sa az-., ' I '" gdILI ' Ill — ._.sta ._ ____.1 i 1 NAVA. I 1 ..1 i . 1 . -2".-Lai.--. ---i I AP.22I 21 MI• ...1 - „ . 2 MAIM. ... MI•innisn .69'LLP /ANIS AIMS I•mons VT A I - 71i, - 2111120222222. • ,,,,, AA Al 1322920 22211/122•1 ..tegi-40 . .• , , .. „ ..., • .,..,..,, ,..• ,, . . , ..• ., . ,,,..,„, . 2 " ' i > , e - (ii•K CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-281 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WOODS AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 17.083 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF-IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "SF-2-QA" SINGLEFANIILY.RESIDENTIAL'DISTRICT-AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND (limpe THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF-IA" Single Family Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and G.\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 1 ,• WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, (iire WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive ZoningOrdinance of the City P G:\O R D\Z O N I N G1480.145 Page 2 Q p of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being The Woods and being approximately 17.083 acres and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District to "SF-20A 'Single Family Residential District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 3 a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 4 8b- i4) (se CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L L G:\OR D\ZONING\480.I45 Page 5 S> - � 1 EXHIBIT "A" The Woods, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3432, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 17.083 acres. C C G:\ORD\ZONING\480.145 Page 6 80 - 0a EXHIBIT "B" j� —`— YLLI j • L - - i l • a.Y.a.iu I u.i2: I Ai 6 I _— or --_ I I - .. _ 1 n, I 1 • '27. -h s — _ I , I _ - 1 Via: i 'i, I _ - . I I - °' ^h m i I T I w- - Iq �`a ry ,. I ----t s I r tr+I i Mt '• . a Y I $T ( eC� qK I —Y - l F.A.'4 A`.R Ha Ei!.'.1 ad I. I. '� 8 i I .� as a x� ,a as — I I lit' .7,, I I wt. ! I I raL ,: ,..:: : r.:., . „..,...,_. i ���a 1�` us. i.. ,.., ,,, , .: :dam :, 2.:., s' s' v. 1 I 1' x 'lc =.r ,•I 1 i I I --a t --' ' ' I I y I I - I - _- - t-1 ; / ' ----- I ii I I L ii I 4iI_ — I s r I 1' ;1 <F. 1 I I it t y --i —1 1 !se ir Al L , I \......ka .:-I'—`-•— - r 8 c F F 7 1 F I ^ lo.... ow. iL I g 1 r .. 0 1 y -- d • . / --- - - ..-I ti.. it p a ~//.' / I '' 1E G I ,. • / j ss= I ,I --='s -- YtJ i .. _ i _ _=i - . ,t!r •" D O ' 500 7 0 E IY6.05iy 19(0.illi?.,"E C t x k la Al I A aal A t Y .. ` t_PPI i !;'J4 y wE RI} le r• •6§ NN�� 1 . . . . .-.. . . .. . I 8n - (3 • City of Southlake,Texas STAFF REPORT May 29, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-0.46 PROJECT: Revised Preliminary Plat- The Woods STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Preliminary Plat of The Woods on property legally described as The Woods, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3432, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 17.083 acres. This plat proposes 27 residential lots. LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of Florence Road and Pearson Lane. OWNER: V.T. Cross APPLICANT: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty-two (22) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Wanda Stutsman, 2112 Cumberland Trail, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Opposed for the following reasons: (1) lots appear to be too narrow; (2) worried about losing the trees; (3) worried about fences; (4) we have a 10' easement, they only a 5'." (Received 5/19/98) • J.M. Drake, 8220 Davis Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas, in favor of. (Received 5/21/98) P&Z ACTION: May 21, 1998; Approved(6-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements listed in Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998, with the exception of those in Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated May 29, 1998. cheil L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-046PP.WPD . • WESTLAKE CfTY LIMIT 1/441... KELLER CITY LIMIT . . . _. : .:3.• :6 . r I .. ) I I :. : < 1: a 1 I ' %kir Isimpum hi i — li II ' 1111-7- -----2,x 11 k 1 • 1 I__ NI mom 2-- ---i__ r -tuts- - ,1,,L1 MIN I i. ' ; 1 ,, 1 ; 1• --1 ..= ,: Iiii , • I. ' az .1111W 1 -- ___vp pjwitehr—Zi... 1,s-fol w.T. Iriviimm:: IL I .- .. ..ec;44 _ 1.1w4- Epp 1 [I I I .;:es 74imi IIIIIPPIPII _ _4, , , Nrea'rckl ' , i I i 1 ELBA — 11°-15-HtS11*- riM \ :. LRA pa ROI° .c0654+1 I i r '\e ,It. i 00., 51 1 meat \. 1/4..... t-- I I ppli I , I 1 L.,,_ . l' 4 TRACT MAP ii .-,inn -, i- 1 •- I 1 I I I 1-1 11: I— Is 1 , 7 ccfsV . .0. ! „ II Qi I- C7 i I- dY CC r d 't ci •* c 416.0, 1li III _ _ _ _ _ o i-: ct: 4 . :T : i ZQamQ Nz QCC M aU � N< Q Q � o ,. N , z R+ t O co X ' ,-,\ W N W N N co r- N N en CC I t, Y • Q I 1 5 N 20- T� N V + 1 1 � it i 11 3 aI 11 0 c_ N a � m Q o N I • o It o • N �, N ? I I I •o r; C) V) �, to N. 1 z %.� W t ui Z CD �I Z slit 2t c W 2— — Z J1 O z 0 0 N E-I a p z Z m m = Q cc' Q w W In 1 w' WJ VZ J Q Q Y J 11 '..... to . 1. 190 all Q I I 1 ,. ,I Y o a o I, f 'I t - CC — is: 0 I; E� C31 U "' V1 0 o co II Wj��, cc v• 1 c A y - N CS1 Q � + �� nI 0` T C. N I t--) �' OU - \ w COO C c'N �' �� F-- I II I I -Z 1 s II IUIO HZIlOS I - 11 _ • - - - - _ _ - -- _ - - - 9.1 SZIim 4U13 x mi U h.�� E+ 14 U 03 n cc ,n `z, CY- • • 4/ 1 .. 3332•4 )CI 1 , i : i 2 ri 1+43_iir or. ..i.:: . . 1 I . ZZ: ..:: 2.• .: :a? Z 1 .:2 `• .. 1 tif i i ,f• :I: ::i : -.; .....: : 3-.2: s i • ii .1: ill P ., !1:= I I ii:ii 1 . i 3 I! E.:: 3•2! : : 83:1 1 i -.2. 14 : rs . I..-- . : 4, , "3 .:. . AIMMINIM. ‘11.100e• ;:44 i'•:: q. . .... . . .Vs.• i :•• :• ::" f 2 1:S 2 : " : . •• . 2 : 2 • i2 : . • N. ;.-. :. '' I: :2 ? : ....: :.• ! i 1 .2 !, .,..... E ; :: :14. 1 a -• .: -• E .: .-. '.33. "1. E. : 3, o - 7.- •::- ": : i • ii !:•21 .: Z . F21 1 :.,... .:.. :-: 11.4 .1 1)2 kll :.:; !,-•'I : .: -- . i .a i gig 11 . 2 : . : : 14 ..iiii s i si . .7: 1 31 8" ! 1,1 L'°-/ ! • : 3 i : ' iz", - Fil I i i • ; ; i — : .2.- :: it MI OT41 i'l', - 1 li: i E 3 .1. 1 i •I i 3 14 :111 : <1 ' I •:!i , • ."''. i I :! 33 t a •:: • 2 fi:: I •:2 •I'll•IM ig i ;2 1 2: I ,I I /2 ' 3 I t 1 -1,. - I 1 a:!: 1I .- 1i:, , 11i: f , • : = !i•,:: ..::: i .:-; ' t.1 : 1 \ •,, , :i 1-- 2 •Er • . : ss • • 2.: 121 i. ' "acticiggg i 1 I , < . I ' 1 .: •11: z i . ; 1 •• - I Lt. : 1 - .E 1 .- ::: — *A.1.0. X.Ikt IA* iL —I I 1 i ° --.4. E i 1 i • 0: i f 4 i LU I• . 1 . >I > k.' .i •f 'to' 0 •.- ,. , • : , , . . . , • I i. - " I - • - ,. . . a•'t g a_ a ca.vaktv.as It S 1 • ...., < u 11...• ..7,..i. .arm-"._ . 4 0 t g 4, - 0 SI 1 . V , I: Li 0 '•4. i go i .: 11141111 \^\‘II f•V•;•' ; '61r, : .2 - —I re . • r-, •1 1.•..1 3 (1) ,.. ... '• !". Likt-M"111.111. '' " Alai mkt .., E Wei." 6 : 2• km 7------€:=1= 15,--;-,rwm, , 4- ii i * 1 i I'•1, •!:::7•11.11" nit,11,1..&nem , .._ . _IS 2 / .; 8/......-—--.21.Aga.M.:47... 1 1 l• a'i / t "'Till"''raila-q1111111. aa= G' •...!:.-,:t-. 0,4.II•f 22 i- . !i --7,,•,,:W, EF-I P MIIMrO iLl.-.Ltw.I..c4i,1....",.3..:.l : - iim: ! : n o LCC.CUL • :T' ' • :.• 171 i .il la 1 ••iv*me S..0 ...! ' i ilk SIC i ..1! X I • .1: 1-1.- 1! IX 1 ' -0 .. .. i 2E:7 ID 1 3 4-3- um-• •-....-la I.e , .I„ • ...: —. ---•-. ':"• - '-'1:,C,7:4'....:‘ •, . 3NV1 NOSHV3d '8 ----- 1W-111L 'z i tss it. .., 1 t. Et g I g• • g 18.4• •I• i ZZ :::3 1 - . i 4".• I!: III 1 i I i I'I 31. 1 v 1 ..,-• :1 V Sa2 Z.. . •i a, 1 I e a I ill: a • City of Southlake,Texas PLAT ' VIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 98-046 Review No: Two Date of Review: 5/29/98, Project Name: Revised Preliminary Plat-The Woods.being 17.083 acres out of the J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No 521 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Fred Joyce- Mary Myers Enterprises. Inc. Goodwin& Marshall. Inc. 1017 W.D. Tate Avenue 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100 Grapevine. Texas 76051 Fort Worth. Texas 76112 Phone: (817)481-3516 Phone: (817) 429-4373 Fax: (817)481-4593 Fax: (817)446-3116 Attn. Bo Trainer CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT LISA SUDBURY AT(817)481-5581,EXT.862. 1. The following changes are needed regarding easements: a. Provide easements for water, sewer and/or drainage in accordance with plans as approved by Public Works. b. Do not center interior easements for water, sanitary sewer, or drainage on common lot lines. Offset so that easement and improvements are in one lot or the other. (Lots 7 & 8,Block 1 and Lots 6& 7, Block 2). c. Staff recommends that easements be provided adjacent to the right-of-way rather than perimeter lot lines where possible to save existing trees. P&ZACTION:• May 21, 1998;Approved(6-0)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated May 15, 1998. * A plat vacation of the existing plat for must be processed and filed of record in the County prior to filing a final plat for this development. * Any new primary structures constructed on Lots 1 through 12,Block 1,and Lot 1 & 15,Block 2,shall face London Dell Drive.No driveway access will be permitted onto Pearson Lane or Florence Road. * Denotes Informational comment cc: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE Goodwin&Marshall, Inc. VIA FAX ABOVE L:NCOlmav\WP FII1AatvVoW$O46PP2.wpn Page 1 COOLV<f nvriluw-.. M\M'1.•11 M.•s•l ..swN:.,aa. I uvo %poi , .„ 1 1 -,..1 :. 4� � " , . ..; 4 �E ;e.+ 3 .. �� 1Y. 1,ji � 1 I 3,s IR ,14 `Yil r7, :@Y {' I v y 17Q s aiY of 3 II I I:A i f 1 g co 9i ' m I ( '3.ro..L. L 4 - i < IL. ... , r !:. ,.....,.__________ ......____,„_, ' :AVM,11 HA.4,.Is.lrnl- -. h i I : 3 ZF °'�t✓� I , •,i., :.' i1,9e . > : _• k! r 11All / 7. a �� L — I I1 1 ...: / ).-- il !! W 1 :om aav / a • ,M., l ,. wvonor L-_ _1_�—__--r.V. 5 u. 1' I' 1. I :, I 1 %. 1 Fr. 4 Fr 1 it 8 j Q;< I S• i ` d3 i _• } I g ,7— - r ' ' g iligri I ' I `= i ,, 1 I • I,ver 1 I? - 1 I .PS (_. �t I iii Rh = Z! y ; ' .i 3}i S C1 i. ,__,.,__________ 5. .1.3 I "" — i; •apt :r . . I. na I 3 I I .V r .. 1�TS :IF kh -;Ls .. gyS �. ' --_ ova s' E ": 2 sa :ss t i I 'I ,�' I I, .' tJ •7. �1 ;Fie .7 : i - =.o i �^ _ ..R a 5. €!: :a' 3. \ \ \ bd, -� 6" . : tr g Ili alie, F. . A 5= : - MEX • ; •I .,, I, ,' I_,} d; �I:gE Ilan 93g" Y.!hi EMI i .BAR I 1 r , -r$ F. w e li ' I.31-0 _ I I "y .. " x I . i p-s — , t 8 *-CO Y '_ 1_I I. i I ' I I vF Z � X i wI, 1 34 • Y • L1J l _ ,:__41 i I l 1 11 —�.R I iC NE. _ T w ".5-:1�i^••^�I us w IAtl1AI - 1 ..__wlnwgl iMtw�I TY,A. IF ij IpAtIMYO I,'w�I7� 3M11131.3f 91115I31 1iI.M , ; k- I I g I4 If E Ice .... o A �. ONO rpwa II w.w r✓1Rw•WwwN.1 O ti il C I a • S. i` 5 • 11 e•• O �V�l g E1$ Rliii 1,i, ", ii I Is t aYY p�� f' Q, ;[ 1 .:7; . : .4 r var I y NI_ i \ y. 6 411- 7,Y.,dam.. ..-,.._wo rrma�, 1 a •• 1 10 .- 1E.— V _ I AYE I 1 eI , ' I: 5 I i 61114! I it � �� 11,8/11141 C.,,, __ _ ___ I 3 *., ;/>...... .. ` „.i. . . ..! , I ________ I • r § 'Cf 1 I • 1 1 • -. i I I y • r I ^ , g � � vi. , 1 < . r r r ^ 1 .1 -- .1 __ 1 __ 1 • sY I r [p 1 1 it it I t i ; 1 I •i. I I 1 • I I ._ II I a 1 1( 1 I. __ 1. II Il ' r II 1 's r Hi I. .,_______. i ' I • I 9i W 8 e4 z r ^ a: to yY t' -- 3 -- I li 1( s , ,., r 1 1 IT- - - - �,<--- C MoINOMPAI 4 A 1 I 311 1 11 31101141=1;11 a I it i E �'7 G J 3 .1 . . i eill 1111.111.13 43 bai bibbovebon.I g NS 0 0 ; ›, - _ LI ht• .i- iii5 47.i Hi ! • it pi E., di 11! 4 If; it . i i., .,. 1 14 -r •C 2 5" °8 11'413 I a> a ,iglit r it t a t i 1 CV a . I CL. g C:r •1.-.-e h i / .4 I •• S 2 I : I !: •\,... --;:-------:-7 ,V, ' 1 1 = wawa. _ IMO Tin 11.... .i . --.._ „: 5 ° g I' ;' 1 . I ---- I •:t ..„." i• • - . 1.• .1 . : dij 5 I dip .. 111 , A I Ili - ' l',/ 1r g I ---1: /I i IV . i •S / , 1 1 - - i 1 1/I s.i 7 Wise . i IVOIMIL I : / , ...„ 1 Iry , . 1 ; , I I .._.... _.____„_. ...o.L... • ......... 5 C..."------... i •I 11 i• • j---...----: 1.-- 1/ '4T1 i\ %V I I I i i I N •.' Z --- ,..... : \ I ....1,,, LN. I / I I I: /..r I I I I . [ \ V: " k 1 0 ,......, , . / ------k 1 ...__11. ': / /1. 1 I \I !i. , § i.; 1 , i • .- ...2.; i v i I 1 . 1 I • • 5g4 • sc. 1 . 7 ,I -- - ;:j /I d - -1 .: s ist • N :Ai i lo, 5 5, 510 ii 7 ---- r —11--..-.... „........./ ii, I Pet ii§ _____—.r\ 4 ill 1 i r i , I i I '. , 3 Z*—;3 I 2 1 . b If,. j..........I / . il — — — -I-yr............. ....j.-LA ALL ............................_SS!-------.-... 1--. - 1 - '. C minimum 6 i. anWie":3 / timaseerat dz„ 1 I f Pi i ' 1 it _... .. -- ...,— , ... FE - 9 _____ • ,.„._ City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Chuck Ewings, Administrative Assistant/Public Works SUBJECT: Setting priorities for County participation in road projects Staff received the attached letter from Tarrant County Commissioner Glen Whitley, Precinct 3, on May 28, 1998. The County is requesting information on street projects that the City would like assistance in reconstructing or repairing. This assistance would be similar to the cooperative projects between the City and County on Brumlow Ave. and N. White Chapel Blvd. Due to the late receipt of this letter, staff has not had an opportunity to compile a list of candidate projects prior to delivery of the Council packets. Staff will provide potential projects during the Council meeting on Tuesday for prioritization. The County would like this information as soon as possible to determine their budget needs for the next fiscal year. Please place this item on the June 2, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE/cre Attachment: Letter from Commissioner Glen Whitley, Tarrant County, Precinct 3 10A-1 /:• COPY •x • 146 L.411)1 Alio re • TARRANT COUNTY NORTHEAST SUB-COURTHOUSE (� 645 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY,SUITE 6 f1ff HURST,TEXAS 76054 U (817)581-3600 FAX(817)581-3603 LAI 1 MAY 2 6 1998 B. GLEN WHITLEY f OFFICE CF CITYY COUNTY COfISSIONER PRECINCT NO.3 SECRETARY Add May 13, 1998 IA MI:\Ga 2 Fg— Honorable Mayor Rick Stacy City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear May lacy: = • During the past year, precinct 3 has been very busy with work on various county road projects, as well as providing assistance to many cities located in our precinct. I am anticipating that the next fiscal year will be equally busy; but, we hope to be able to assist our cities in the reconstruction and repair of streets within the various incorporated areas. I am asking that you submit your request for county assistance to us within the next two weeks, so that we may consider it along with all others we receive. Our first priority in providing assistance will be cities that did not receive assistance during the past year. Please keep in mind that we will focus our work on thoroughfares, arterials and major collectors. If you are requesting work on more than one project, please identify your city's priority for each project. If you have any questions in this matter:please contact me or Jane Sanford. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you in this cooperative effort and look forward to another productive year. Yours truly, B. Glen Whitley, County Commissioner Precinct 3 10A-2 City of Southlake,Texas I1/417 MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Status Report on Project Management, Coordination and Review of Southlake Town Square and Town Hall Town Square Concrete piers and foundations have been poured for 6 buildings; slabs have been poured for 2 buildings; and steel erection has begun on 2 buildings. The developer is still scheduled to begin turning buildings over to tenants for tenant specific finish out starting in November 1998. Opening for business is still scheduled for March 1, 1998. All water, sewer, and drainage improvements should be completed by June 5, 1998, (weather permitting). Paving of the parking lots is scheduled to begin in mid-June. We anticipate that we will be prepared to bid the North Carroll Avenue relocation by the end of June, with construction being completed by the end of 1998. Several changes have been made to the approved site plan. 1. Band Shell has been relocated north of the original site. This relocation was due to the change in configuration of the detention/retention pond at this location. 2. Building 1D was increased by 10 feet to accommodate tenants. This resulted in a 1,000 square foot increase on the first floor only. 3. Block 1 parking was shifted to the west to accommodate the smaller detention pond and increased width of Building 1D. 4. Building 5A was revised from a two story "L" shaped building to two buildings. The building fronting Grand Avenue is a two story building with a 17,182 square foot footprint and the building adjacent to FM 1709 is a one story building with an 8,080 square foot footprint. This reconfiguration resulted in a decrease of 8,920 square feet. 5. Additional landscaping was placed within the parking lots. Adequate parking is provided. (Most of this landscaping will be removed when the multi-story parking Nor structures are constructed.) 11A-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E.HAWK TOWN SQUARE STATUS REPORT MAY 29, 1998 PAGE 2 6. The developer has been asked to provide information relative to enhancements of the crosswalks at the 6 intersections surrounding Town Hall and the downtown open area. The approved site plan did not address the installation of brick pavers at these crosswalks; however, a cost proposal has been requested in case the city is interested in pursuing these crosswalks. 7. Dumpsters have been relocated from areas adjacent to buildings and have been placed adjacent to the parking lots. All dumpsters will be screened in accordance with the city requirements. All dumpster locations have been coordinated with Trinity Waste. Town Hall Urban Architecture has continued to work on the space programming of the Town Hall. They have met with Tarrant County, C.I.S.D., and city staff to finalize space needs for all three jurisdictions and to establish inter- and intra- organizational relationships for assignment of space. We have requested that Urban provide the city with a proposal for professional services for the design of the Town Hall Facility. We are currently discussing a scope of services for this project. We hope to have a proposal to City Council no later than July 7, 1998. is 11 A-2 E-v<< ILIL7 , flY/1111■ 'f'A trtlKMl•Ij; II•, }jj141a1• I jl 7.0•. sle,arYyo a �LOlOYL+1N0O I SINIa33NION3 NnI I111 riaA ^.}II, alss+arizl ,>dr 911 'w23t 0 nv :a33N19N3 1411 /rl 2-„tljltl law 'a11 •rlma wwgpcm_'M :3N103NIJN3 n1 JJvNI tRTOSUItI ,?OV -ia TLr100ar wYwlO zU33NIJN3 11A10 rL2rttlr lt; T'J a.t[+ztnla , m ?11 •yY[ LIAre ••• :a33NIDN3 1VNn I nhw 14; fll 'b`IrW •710., Resat v+ ela.e 10311 HOL1Y N111 c1n Ypa,rl 2 YOI,N =oao03a 30 17311HON u/a_.ttun; Ink r.►aj21,1t1 w.. Iar, u 'a•'•uloi rl Lila I 'Y1 tilrly,Ot tf•'j Ill stilt I OaC X-L '3",iminos 3b!YnOS NMOJ 3WIHOOS 001-10 YZ -ON 2m sVX31 •uNnoo 1N` dvyl 3NVlHinos jo /ki l o 19V ON '1S9Y 'A3AVS SOY3 OVYHOIV 3H1 NI ONY1 30 1OYL11 3KY SVO•IV Y SUVnbs NA101 UTIH OS c[M X30NI NV18 31 IS L66L T T q nv 0.038 .001.•Ij3MS lia� oK ml . e ILI, btt•4'c) Was -1 [tS7-o" 111e1 1104 r1ru •mo.1%, 00. 711016 •Iy1Ye LTL sit sit 'OHI 'SaI VIOOSSY ➢FYHYHO NTId ON wyr"d rwlj 1111-lit Illel F/ Do" -on 111ti 2A%1 r1cu •ifrblwc 001 Ills "4,11 ITlLLr10t 'i I U I 'SKIHH3,'s QUY a3d000 Y3I0 i11,30 •iIYM A117 AYOIS t Oso sobd A N211l3OA3 3H1 MIA •Z SI S31YO1S !0 Y39t'111 •zm CS 103HIM3130 39 01 110131,11 '17YM J117 AVO1S A{ C3SOd0Yd JO N0111377(3 3111 H11A •.ZS S1 11013M t,'A 1 •Y 'SL~nIM Jo W 000.02 S30n'CN1 30Y100J 3no5 11V13Y I•t '31YA1 X01011W Y3YY MIG11n9 JO 35r100J 3Wnot I •Z 'SSOY7 •JN1011119 3W SMI1YYMYI v3WY TW t•I j 31ON •/•t on-oe. •J•f ta•wt •J•c ta•olt tw1cl •J•t t2A•Yr •J•t Ier•rt •J•t IF•r2 rt IIM '/'f rro•1+ '/•[ ti0'ZS 'I'[ 22D•Lt Zcl 1 a>,Im1/1t 'J't ,let•K 'I•t eee•K '/'L eee•K rr e111C,Irtt CC* 'J•t 000•al 'J'f o n a"1011/r •J•t eee•K •J•t tee'K at 011Ir"d 'f•L am:,-, 'J't 000.11 'J•c ow J: : all 'J't 000•K •/'f am II •J•c 000.11 21'sit 01 a"In ra •J•t ra-12 •J•t AA1•K •J•t LU-91 K 711PIIM •J•t tK•1t •J•t iw•K •J-1 ae•L2 K 011=Z4 'J•L all •IL •1•t CAD as •i's [A at a1 arlin W101 371 JJO 11Y13Y Y39M ?11011 n9 SNOI1Vln73Y1 YJYY ONio-ime ---- S37YIS ZI IO.AOw t37Ydt aNIOY01 t37Ydt 0 10.03Y t30YJS aNICIM1 C33V1s 1002 IO.AOw 933YA SNIXWJ t97Ydt t►el 10.rw 07Yd2 'JMIXYYJ 7Oi rl 13SYiMCO 311 S •1.1 9r9.Oe► IY3W 7100'V SS01A •J•S czv sw IY31Y ONI Olin XSAz•► 37YR 14Jr10 onaRW .01"No2 1SIX3 'OY 9cJ'12 / •J•s Y9l•9oz•I 35:1 =In • •0•11 1 '7Y ss1'I / 'J'9 Z" 91 xwi 'own '7Y ►S's•II / •J•c 962•cm l-luls •0•n•1 '7Y S7"0'I► / 'J'9 9Z6.191'I Y3W MIM VIVO 3:IS d N A I.I11IOI.A 7r,U1Y yelp' IYI aLSIY t 1� r •[r. •u9 @ 1•t's1a•'j ll�am YI M a+• 10 IG102 .. Of t.o.c� n,rwra 'ago Ivu uel• 01 C311wI, la �n1 ta.�o �•�•+• s• keel, •w•JI •"-a x—,lm 1 olM js •OOI \ use . •ln a s w I"I..w7. STn�71 S 71 JlYYl I Ate I.=- • • .. AYr,3n1Y0 03SG0Yt I II 035G0W -_-- _- - - -- V/ ' N I -I a Q lil II )Ynln/ I IIIII III 10 di tiSZ p II II III !11 G I >a "'" •n•, I T :I III III I1f ,r I Q a11+01 'C3�_ is 9 X1C7f � I vo 111 III ,;1 1.1 1• I Ol III.111 111 Ili )� of •11 II' -L1 it ♦ QaY o 0n41 - n IpaZ •9331US 3-AI MY L.M) 3 . a 1 1.6 3W NAOIS t372Jc T7Y •0fU U4 3H1 HlIA 33WCW=v NI c37Yds YY7 12YJe= TrYLS11 01 L 51 V XU 93AU=Md 78JO•L IAX XU ('I I INY-W 31'l,KOHYI 334 •VNIdr74'OrY1 ! 9 IANSil Woo 1.01 'A)IS 341 Ol N3/O 39 'ma Am A31A rmu 03hmws 39 Ol 7YAM TIV I •e •31YO 311111ftJ Y IV A31AN MY11111S YOJ 03111191E 39 TIYf6 Ne 1 C30 TDSONY9 I •9 '3 wu 3.11 MI llp%cu 'ie1011n9 JD 37NrnSil O1 IJOIw 1,1111p11s 03SIAW Y 3711ncu TIIA S4OIL4J 03joM 30it7 TIY (•I '0•n'd 3LL Jo E3N 1 i301 ro 341 110cm 03111.11CIA CIN I 39 AV" s37Yds IMMIX) •t37YiS 3ZIS •Olt NO 03SY9 As= 3N.6 Wwrl Co '1177Tr1011 39 It" AV" CMUS-11"m 3F= 04Y W711 3MIW 31141 h*6U '013171WIS)= 10H st LfYWWL23W Y it I•E •IdOIIYZIIYNIJ L1YH31 01 YOIw 304YFD Atli 9371AbW iMAX 3 1131YA I'r • 11 �*+*'+ 39 TM4t LX7YA301 t T7Y (• •7z311M 9 alAv � 1 xsrYf /a I-h*AJ.Y 30 TH14S Asa -VI TIY -Z '31111 tlHl lY 03HIt011170 39 IDWD t35YIN 3WLLAJ 3M1 YOJ 3-M31Ot V '6661 'Y390170 011.310= 39 ON J6E1 JO kDePCIIAW NI N1531B 01 07Y103.O't tl 1 WrAd UI •1'AVi .W�i �e ('A" w) Z 1zrAu 30` CI21a I•eT•, 7[• 41L6-ISz tiltl rv/ - oov1-azS 1I19: z6Jc1 M3. '3xr"PunOS 001 311r7S ''OAPs 7xrl4: n05 .3 1211 •d•1 •711 iE]IS 01„ b'310C'l 0/'0 I C=7dO0Y Sk:l, ^ T7r I'7'I'Y'0 •0112 'G •Gr96 •roA Nvr01170, 'A 317531 '1 .7.1 •Y•0 •9OZ1 'k •.16f6 -roA NY/401t151 •A 317631 '1'7•I -Y'0 T l2 'SI -sr"'-CA 7C39 -A 31YYOl izl •y,� •6616 •roA X^39 'A 31 YYG1 '1'7'1'Y'0 't6C '711 •CIc4 'roA Yx1171 is wer lOm '1 .7.1'V'C • Ir2l 'S. • : 105 •roA &'lore 131103J 341 cw_']P 0 UOO2Y7 x2..l.re .a 11> �I III, Il1`111 I. il.11l�l I�UI 1; •I VL— HAD ! !III - I! Ill��ll.11l,lllil 1:111.11 �` .I n I,!II•,!,�Illllj,l!jl:l n V it 17I.:11. a 111111111i1 r fact �) Z lrr[+I 'Q • S7: 2iT 11•KI m1lo' ti • � � cr d1 7a calve I•e'n• T 110001 CAI A11000 WICT . �•;� I A 10?G2 - I 1•a .tr: �-- it I: a I YYYd 371fJ0 OOOe,iS3Y7 10 r . zc p I II ILLffe�ea t I 1 ='v • 1 101 I � ' � � � ,I I sr •N •[ts[ •b. a.nlwll r'� a!\ leer 2+•lu,a 4t vac '4' I� I e .[1•Ic l., l'/I I/OOILiY u1D/� oo. oo.tlw zs .0"0, t 1 E i s ll1 E -,a' 0 o Aw3NYO 03SOdow 4 , • 1 �i. 7 w1jralel0 I ! 'a •c7 CfLA1 n/J r .4.0. 7i11 .ot ItlVLL7[ •acr .2T—J III II I I � III II I I III ram.. q 13 ar+vs•I I 1 s•Ier Rr1 ;aom9 r w,.I. I CV'1sS = 'A3i3 .AV 110VVY3 N 8 VI I 'H'S d3 VOO 'M'S 1Y d•d NI 3NIds 'M•L+ - IZ ►i91 UL+VWRON39 G3A02iddY AliO ' : I IC3. t ulDf)Q --_ wllt7l c•n•, er ,c3,cz %1 •V auw.le,om Ie sa Iuow [It1 •21 •/K21 •b DDO, 'WIDMIC311 A11000 MI CIC 1 1•81A•1 try IO'B rout •2 1rw a ,aT•I � .nr : '17'1 •Y'I •0[TI IOIt 'r 'M Z 3l.114J A31 AKLr" t x0ole .Z 101 �t rotJL ND@ I •_— •1!: tttj L •0111 -eI I .a 1wA01 yw,tr 11 2ewr UIawIR 1 '1'0'17'I •OCtI IOIt '[ •M CCC 1 z Wol i u l AM1nOS i S =019 .1 101 .ass loot :1 ! I as •s, •full •b a —A ,12[ , fir wI • 1'Y'•owl IOIt •r •1Ya 2 3i114I A31ANinOS 'I •I :I I X3o19 •Of 101 .ozs Ioc •j: $:I L66L T T J nV U38 MKIA IQVK 1 bL cwimina -N mun mowuJ nida in HIM loaw.ls wv3de ev-is SIN3Nn000 NV-ld'IVNld HIIM 43nssi 3e OI I0dIN00 l`dNOISN3W1a ltMld 3Ib'W IXOdddV 38V SNOISN3W IO llV NOi-LonHISN00 dOd ION AHVNlWll3dd i7� axVfIO S NMOJ, ii L-On1181HX3 NOIIVUnOIJNOD 1N380 �i E L 5 WIPLOM 3HY11US NMO1 3Xd1H1110S City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM May 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Project Prioritization by City Council Over the past couple of years we have been utilizing a"Project Prioritization"exercise to help staff work in accordance with the priorities of Council. This process has provided clear direction to staff as to the Council's desires and has greatly aided in the productivity of staff due to our ability to focus on the higher priorities. The most recent Progress Report(dated January 29, 1998) is attached and shows significant accomplishments since the last prioritization. It is again time to confirm the desires and direction of City Council as it pertains to the projects to be undertaken by staff. For the benefit of the newly elected Councilmembers and as a refresher, a description of the process is as follows: 1. Determine Items to be Prioritized: This is the item before you presently. Staff generates a list of items requiring review by City Council and many times another appointed body such as the Planning and Zoning Commission or Park Board. We are forwarding this list to you as well as the related Project Advocacy Forms(PAF) so that you can review the list to make sure that no items that you are interested in have been overlooked. As well,you should look at the PAF forms to ensure that the breadth of discussion regarding each item is to your satisfaction. These forms will be the basis for each Councilmember to review as they prioritize all items. Note that there is a blank PAF form at the end of the packet should an entirely new item be desired. We will need any revisions returned to Lori Farwell by the end of the day on Friday, June 5. 2. Distribute Revised Forms to Council for Ranking: Staff will revise the master list as well as the PAF forms, add any new items that might be requested, and distribute to each Councilmember the master list and backup forms. Each Director will also provide a list of recommended priorities for the items within their department as another reference. We will ask each Councilmember to rank all projects listed,e.g. if there are 50 projects there should be 10 number 1's, 10 number 2's, 10 number 3's, etc. 3. Calculation of Priorities: Staff will take the rankings provided by Council and rank all items. A summary chart will be provided to Council at the June Retreat to confirm the rankings. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\CC-CEH4.WPD City of Southlake,Texas In summary the timing is as follows: January 29 - Distribute draft Master Form and PAF forms to Council for review June 5 - Council to return any recommended revisions to Lori Farwell (fax 488-9370) June 9 - Staff gives final forms to Council for ranking June 12 - Rankings returned to Lori Farwell June 18 - Finalized rankings placed in June Retreat Packets June 25 or 26 -Discuss Rankings at June Retreat We realize that the time frames for your review are tight but our goal is to have the City Council rankings calculated prior to the June Retreat so we can include the final priorities in the June Retreat packet and discuss at the retreat. We appreciate your cooperation in providing timely responses. Feel free to contact any department director or the staff contact shown on the PAF form to discuss an item or find out additional information. PLEASE RETURN ANY RECOMMENDED REVISIONS TO THE MASTER LIST OR PAF FORMS TO LORI FARWELL BY FRIDAY, JUNE 5. Her fax number is 817-488-9370. GL/gl a, enc. Progress Report dated January 29, 1998 from previous prioritization exercise Council Prioritization Schedule Draft dated May 29, 1998 Project Advocacy Forms for each referenced item Blank Project Advocacy Form (last page in packet) L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\CC-CEH4.WPD 1( -2 OLP ro ran Progress Report: January 29, 1998 Fog' SWF QED (Ilaw Priority COUNCIL PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE-Approved March :, 1997 Highest Lowest 1 2 3 4 5 Dept Item Rank Score 4 CD 1 1.00 5 CD 1 1.00 4 1 PW Drainage Master Plan(Phase I95%, Work Session Pen' 2 1.20 4 1 P • Franchise Utility Placement Ordinance(20%) 2 1.20 3 1 PR 3 1.25 ti 4 2 CD 4 1.67 3 2 1 PW Stre• Standards Ordinance(Ord.217) begin 1/20/98) 4 1.67 2 1 1 PR 5 1.75 2 1 1 PS 800 MHZ stem(Pending to • site finalization) 5 1.75 2 1 1 , CMO Citywide Strat- is Plan(50% 5 1.75 2 2 1 PW Utility Policies& tandar.. Ord(Revise Ord. 170)(To Begin 1/20/98) 6 1.80 Le 4 1 1 CD Zoning Ord.-Outsid. ' •rage Issues(20%-Research Complete) 7 1.83 2 2 2 CD Amortization of 2iton-Conforming Uses(5%) 8 2.00 2 2 2 PR/CD 8 2.00 2 2 PR - 8 2.00 3 2 1 CD Lightin: Standards(75%if we ado' Plano-based ordinance) 8 2.00 3 1 1 1 CD Zo ig Ord.-Impervious Coverage(I:°o-Attorney reviewing) 9 2.17 3 2 1 CD 10 2.33 2 1 1 1 CD Zoning Ord.480-V(Misc.Revisions)(95%aw.Ting WG input) 11 2.40 2 1 2 1 PR/2121 12 2.50 2 1 1 'W Electrical Code Regional Update(Ord.No.620)(to • on 2-3-98) 12 2.50 2 1 2 1 PW Sign Ordinance Revisions(5%) 12 2.50 2 1 1 PS Emergency Preparedness Plan(85%) 12 2.50 3 1 2 CD Residential Adjacent Ord.(Nbhd Preserv.)(80%-Attorney reviewi 12 2.50 2 2 1 PW Uniform Housing Code Update(Ordinance 214)(to CC on 2-3-98) 13 2.60 1 1 1 CD 4 2.67 2 1 1 1 PW Commercial Dumpster Ordinance(80%) 14 2.67 ioline, 1 1 2 1 PW Substandard Building Code(Ordinance 615)(to CC on 2-3-98) 15 '.80 L•1COMDEV1WP.Fn.Fsetto F.CrnPR1OR TYeRI-RNR3.WPD r (IS I �3 j Progress Report-January 29,1998(4:16pm) 'riority COUNCIL PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE-Approved March 18, 1997 Lope Highest Lowest 1 2 3 4 5 Dept. Item Rank ore 1 2 3 PS Update Noise Control Ordinance No.484(20%) 1 2.83 1 1 2 CMO V 17 3.00 1 2 1 CS Health and Sanitation Ordinance 17 3.00 1 3 1 CD Zoning Ordinance-Front Yard issues(10%Research complete) 18 3.50 2 2 1 P Septic Ordinance(30%) 19 3.80 1 1 2 CMO Open Records Ordinance 20 4.25 4 PS 21 5.00 Legend:PW=Public Works, r—Community Development,PR=Parks,CM'. =City Manager's Office, CS=City Secretary,P —Public Safety,HR=Human Resources G=Workgroup Dept. I The Following Items Were Not Frio ' ' d by Council but Have Been ompleted based on Council's Direction I CD CD CD Lior CD PS/CM CM/HR CMO CMO HR HR HR HR Dept. The Followin l tems Were Not Prioritized by Council but are in Progress based i Council's Direction CD SOB-Sex ally Oriented Business Regulations(Draft being prepared by FBT) PR Bob J. .es Park Ph.I Construction PR B. entennial Park Expansion Ph.II Design CMO Renovation of Eubanks House for Senior Center L'COMDEVW1P-FILESIPROJECrS\PRIORITY\PR1-RNR3.WPD t( ,-q Progress Report-January 29,1998(4:16pm) COUNCIL PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE-Draft: May 29, 1998(4:29pm) K_ t1EW -1' % l_1S� Form Dept Item Enc. CD Zoning Ordinance-Address Outside Storage Issues Yes CD Zoning Ordinance 480-CC: (Residential Adjacency, Corridor revisions) (95% Yes Complete) CD City-Initiated Rezonings per the 1998 LUP Update Yes CD Zoning Ordinance-Front Yard issues(Workgroup 10%complete) Yes CD Zoning Ordinance-Reduce Residential PUD Min. Acreage Yes CD Zoning Ordinance-Amendments to Parking Requirements Yes CD Zoning Ordinance- S.O.B. Regulations Yes CD Zoning Ordinance 480-BB: (Impervious Coverage) Yes CD Amortization of Certain Non-Conforming Uses Yes CD Zoning Ordinance 480-V-Misc. Clean-up Items Phase I(95%) Yes (kkts.,, CD Zoning Ordinance- Special Events Permit&Procedures Yes CD Zoning Ordinance- SUP for Commercial uses in Industrial Districts Yes CD/PS Sign Ordinance Revisions (WG 75%complete) Yes PW Septic Ordinance Yes PW Street Standards Ordinance(Ord. 217) Yes PW Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance (Revise Ord.No. 170) Yes PW Drainage Master Plan Yes PW Utility Placement Ordinance Yes PW Storm Water Utility District Yes PR Park Dedication Ordinance-Fee Justification Study Yes PR Land Acquisition Plan for Ultimate Build-out of Park System Yes PR Sidewalk/Trail Implementation Plan • Yes PR Trail System Master Plan Update Yes Dept Legend: PW=Public Works, CD=Community Development,PR=Parks, CMO=City Manager's Office, CS =City Secretary,PS =Public Safety,HR=Human Resources, FI=Finance LACOMDENW P-FQ.FSPROJECCS\PRIORtMPR1-MTX6.W PD COUNCIL PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE Dept Item Form Enc. CMO Commercial Dumpster Ordinance No CMO Citywide Strategic Plan No CMO Smoking Ordinance No CMO Open Records Ordinance No PS Health and Sanitation Ordinance Yes PS Lighting Standards/Street Light Standards (WG 60%complete) Yes PS Update Noise Control Ordinance No. 484 Yes L Dept Legend: PW=Public Works, CD=Community Development,PR=Parks, CMO=City Manager's Office, CS =City Secretary,PS =Public Safety,HR=Human Resources, FI=Finance L\COMDEV 1WP-FILES\PROIECPS\PRIORITYIPRI-Mfx6.WPD 1ig= PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Outside Storage and Screening Standards (10%) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New ,Minor Revision X ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy. Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/23/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Development standards for outside storage and screening are not compatible with the community's vision. 2. Walls, fencing,hedges/plantings may not be adequate to totally screen the outside storage,parking areas, etc. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) (4610, 1. Consider differentiating between outside storage and outside display. 2. Consider increasing the height of walls or placement of more mature plantings in order to allow some outside storage. 3. Establish a work group comprised of business representatives, city officials and staff to establish regulations which balance the objectives of the community with the needs of businesses. General Comments: 1. Zoning Administration and Code Enforcement Divisions are faced with outside storage issues on a weekly basis. Current regulations are too subjective and need more definition in order to effectively enforce the community's standards. List any references to be reviewed(other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. 1. N/A ‘1110.- L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\STORAG02.WPD May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 ite'' PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance No.480-CC-Residential Adjacency Standards and Corridor Overlay Zone Revisions (95% complete) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Pamela Muller. former Councilmember: Councilmembers Gary Fawks and Scott Martin STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy,Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem,concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Need to address adjacency issues between single-family residential and non-residential uses. 2. Issues to address include lighting,noise, screening,pitched roofs, screening of HVAC equipment. cre List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. May wish to eliminate standing seam metal roofs. (Requested amendment from Debra Edmondson and Gary Fawks) 2. May wish to limit the allowed percentage of synthetic stucco materials, such as EIFS-type materials. (Requested amendment from Debra Edmondson and Gary Fawks) General Comments: Greg Last and Karen Gandy feel that we could address the desired issues by creating"residential adjacency standards"in each of the non-residential districts rather than trying to create a new ordinance or new section in the zoning ordinance. List any references to be reviewed(other cities,etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N/A L:\COMDEV\WPFILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJREQ.FRM\RFS ADI.DOC May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 1lg'$ ' PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM L., SHORT TITLE: City Initiated Rezonings TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: City Council STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Potential for development to occur on tracts currently zoned more intensively than might be desired. • 2. Less control on already zoned tracts. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. A list of zonings which do not conform to the 1998 LUP recommendations was included in the data accumulated for the 1998 LUP update. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc:) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. L:ICOMDEVIWP-F LESIPROJECPSTRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\RPZONoI.Wu*. Q� 1 Q^rm Date: May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 l' PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Correcting inconsistencies between "Frontage." "Front Yard," "Lot Frontage" (10% complete) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision . Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component . Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy. Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy. Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/23/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Corner lots require front yard setback on each street frontage. 2. Ordinance requires "front" of the lot to be the lot line along the street which has the least dimension. 3. Builders want the flexibility to choose which street to front. 4. These inconsistencies have caused addressing and permitting problems. 5. There are a growing number of "flag or panhandle lots" being submitted as infill properties are being developed. 6. Better define where lot width is measured. (Staff's interpretation: measured at the minimum front yard setback). 7. Establish a minimum lot width for non-residential lots. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Consider adding a development regulation for "Side Yards Adjacent to Street"like PUD's have in their regulations. 2. Establish minimum criteria for approval of flag lots (e.g., maximum number of lots, maximum acreage, etc.). 3. Consider reducing the minimum lot width of cul-de-sac lots to 85' instead of the required 100' for residential lots so that only the minimum required front setback is shown on the plat. 4. Revise yard definitions to better evaluate the appropriate setbacks, especially on irregularly- shaped lots. 5. Determine whether adequate lot frontage is achieved by the lot abutting a public street or by accessing a public street by means of a common access easement. If the lot does not have to abut a public street, how are the required setbacks established...where are the front, side, and rear yards of the lot? General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N/A • L\ OMDEv\WP-FILESWxomCTSPRIowrnrxa-REQ.tR2d WRONT-03.WPD File Date:May 29,1998 Page lof 1 Its-Id PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Residential PUD-Reduction in Minimum Acreage Requirement (5%) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New ,Minor Revision X ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance X ,Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Councilmembers Scott Martin. Gary Fawks.Pam Muller(Ex-councilmember) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem,concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Infill properties(less than 50-acres in size)have presented certain development challenges, such as lotting configuration, access, street alignments, screening and buffering, etc. 2. Appears to be a need for flexibility in infill development. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. The amount of dedicated open space needs to be reviewed. Currently,the ordinance requires a minimum of 10% for properties being developed residentially. 2. General Comments: Staff supports this concept; however,we recommend that the R-PUD not be reduced below 5 or 10 acres. Currently,R-PUD's require a minimum of 50 acres. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Limited research has been completed. b. c. LACO D wP-Fn.FsTROJECTSrwMUTYWRa-REQ.FRM\RPvo-ncz.won - Fnrm Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 t(8-t PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM (tkir. SHORT TITLE: Amendment to Parking Regulations in Zoning Ordinance (2%) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New ,Minor Revision X ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Scott Martin. Councilmember STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: April 21. 1998 DATE RECEIVED: April 21. 1998 BY: GL/KPG Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Reduce the minimum required parking for non-residential developments. 2. Conversely increase the landscaping areas required within parking "lots/areas". 3. Allow less impervious construction techniques for parking areas (not driveways or fire lanes). cipe List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: 1. Several local developers have indicated that the current ordinance provisions are in line with industry demands. 2. The square footage of individual office space is being reduced; therefore,resulting in a greater number of persons working within a building. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Limited research has been completed. b. LACGIDEVWWP-FILES\PRGIECTSTIUORITYNPROI-REQ.FRKPARKWG2.WPD May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 ►(6-I2- • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Le SHORT TITLE: Sexually-Oriented Businesses (Ordinance and Study) (75%) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New ,Minor Revision ,Major Revision X Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: Study to support the findings of the ordinance revision REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator(following developer inquiries) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 11/97 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Current ordinance(No. 399)requires updating. 2. Study required as part of update. 3. Determine appropriate zoning districts for the various types of adult entertainment uses. cie List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Must be able to justify separation distances from churches and synagogues,public or private elementary or secondary schools or day nurseries,park, residentially-zoned or used properties 2. Regulations must be based on health, safety, and general welfare concerns, not on moral issues. General Comments: 1. I recommend that a Joint Executive Session for City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission be held prior to any public meeting on this subject. 2. Moratorium currently in place until August 4, 199$. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Ordinances/studies from across U.S. under review: Amarillo,Austin, Beaumont, El Paso, Houston, Indianapolis, Las Vegas, and Los Angeles. b. c. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REO.FRM\SOBSTDY2.WPD May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 lle)—I3 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Lie SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance No.480-BB-Impervious Coverage Regulations (70%) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X ,Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Scott Martin/Bill Kemp/Gary Fawks/Debra Edmondson CC X,P&Z X , ZBA X, PB_, STAFF_,Other: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 7/30/97 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem,concern or opportunity. (Do not defme solution) 1. Run-off control/mitigation to lessen drainage impacts. 2. To lessen erosion of natural stream beds 3. Although the landscape ordinance sets minimum parameters for landscape areas, no current regulations address overall total impervious coverage allowed. List any potential considerations. (Do not defme solution) cire 1. Will lessen financial demands to"concrete over"our natural stream beds. 2. Will help maintain our existing native trees through keeping their critical root zone open for water&gas exchange. 3. The Committee attempted to be mindful the maximum building coverage allowed as we drafted these proposed requirements, however the reality of the situation is that rarely if ever is the maximum lot coverage ever achieved,therefore it maybe very realistic to decrease the maximum allowed impervious coverage in many districts. General Comments: Southlake citizens do not want to live amongst a "sea of parking" as is allowed in most other communities. List any references to be reviewed(other cities,etc.)or any documents attached to this request. a. Current draft being reviewed by new work group. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\IMP-COV3.WPD May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Le SHORT TITLE: Amortization of Certain Uses TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: Process for the Board of Adjustment REQUESTED BY: City Council STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/25/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem,concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. The property at the northwest corner of Highland and SH 114 2. The pool chemical facility in East Haven Addition along Continental List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) (iiiiwe 1. Will require budgeting professional services for a forensic accountant to evaluate the business records of the affected companies. 2. Will require a great deal of the city attorney's time monitoring the Board of Adjustment proceedings. General Comments: We have discussed the amortization of these uses in the past. List any references to be reviewed(other cities,etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROD-REO.FRM\AMORTIZ2.WPD May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 (cQ- IS PROJECT ADVO ACY FO M Laue SHORT TITLE: Zoning Ordinance Revisions: Resurrect Ord. 480-V(20+clean-up °items) (95/°) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision ,Major Revision X Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/23/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Clarify the variance language in the S-P-1/S-P-2 districts. 2. Revise the definition of accessory buildings/uses and address the regulation of these structures/uses. 3. Change the method of calculating parking spaces for multiple buildings constructed on the same lot. co, 4. Revise the roadway cross-section references in the bufferyard section to correspond with the changes in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. This ordinance has been worked on a great deal and has been before P&Z once. There were many changes recommended to wording in the original ordinance. General Comments: Minor changes will need to be made to the current draft before it can be brought forward. Readvertisement will also have to occur prior to public hearing on this ordinance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. N/A L:ICOMDEV\WP-F1LES\PROJECTSTRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRMM80-V-02.WPD May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 • ice—IG PROJECT ADVOCA Y FO M SHORT TITLE: Special Eventso P Permit t �5/o) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance X ,Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581.ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 5/97 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Currently we have no process whereby special events(school carnivals,retail promotions,art festivals, etc.) can be approved. 2. Town Square development references the issuance of Specific Use Permits for special outdoor events. The discussion at the time was that the ordinance would be amended to create a SUP for such events. L List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Need to address length of permit, frequency of permits, hours of operation, alcoholic beverage sales,parking, lighting, signage,traffic management issues 2. General Comments: I would suggest that for certain of these events that the Council consider amending the accessory use section and establish certain criteria for Staff approval of these permits, like the tent permit for retail sales. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Research in progress. L\COMDEH\WP-FILES'PROJECTSPRIORIMPROJ-REQ.FRM\SPECIAL2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 (6-17 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM L. SHORT TITLE: SUP for Commercial Uses in Industrial Districts (amendment to Zoning rung Ord.) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New ,Minor Revision ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance ,Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Developers &Land Owners in Commerce Business Park STAFF CONTACT: Greg Last or Karen Gandy.Zoning Administrator.481-5581. ext. 743 DATE OF REQUEST: 3/98 DATE RECEIVED: BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. There are multiple uses within the light industrial park that could benefit from the ability to have a small retail component. 2. It might allow businesses to grow within Southlake and remain in Southlake. 3. L. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. 2. 3. General Comments: There appear to be two options, create a mixed use business district or amend the existing SUP (#31) and increase the allowed percentage of retail in the designated districts. List any references to be reviewed(other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. kobiar LCOMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTSPRIORPMPROJ-REQ.FRMISUP-INDI�n Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 • I(g"'IS PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Sign Ordinance Revisions Complete) (75% p ) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New ,Minor Revision X ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Greg Last/Bob Whitehead STAFF CONTACT: Stefanie Sarakaitis. Comprehensive Planner.481-5581.ext. 753 DATE OF REQUEST: March 14. 1997 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Signs being constructed are maximizing the area of the sign panel and not providing for any architecturally integrated support structures. 2. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) %•► 1. Look at the way the size of the signs are measured 2. 3. General Comments: The current ordinance measures the area of the sign to the exterior of any supporting structures. The tenants are demanding the biggest sign possible, not allowing the sign contractor or the developer the ability to provide an architecturally integrated sign support structure. A revision to the ordinance where the size of the sign is measured by the size of the sign panel itself would easily correct the problem. List any references to be reviewed(other cities,etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. L 1COMDEVIWP-FILFS\PROJEGTSPRIORITY1PROJ-REQ.FRMISIGN2.WPD May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Lise SHORT TITLE: Septic Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead. Director of Public Works.481-5581. ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Septic systems in an urban residential setting tnd to saturate the soils therebyy causing runoff. 2. 3. ‘46,,, List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Tarrant County Public Health Dept. serves as the city's provider of this service. 2. One acre lots can have "on-site" disposal system. 3. • General Comments: List any references to be reviewed(other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROTECTS\PRIOR1TY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\SEPTIC2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 / _20 PROJECT ADVQCACY FORM Loo, SHORT TITLE: Street Standards Ordinance(Revision to Ordinance 217) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead. Director of Public Works. 481-5581. ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Old ordinance which is outdated. 2. Street construction materials have changed. • 3. Opportunity to develop a"Standards Manual" for all infrastructure. Loy List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Construction standards -- i.e., materials, testing methods are changing. Ordinance has not changed. 2. Need flexibility in ordinance to develop new standards without the need to change the ordinance. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed(other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. NCTCOG b. TxDOT L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRM\STREETS2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM (116re SHORT TITLE: Utility Policies and Standards Ordinance (Revisions to Ord. 217) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision , Major Revision XX Type: Ordinance XX ,Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC ,P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF ,OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead.Director of Public Works. 481-5581. ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Old ordinance which is outdated. 2. Water and sewer construction materials have changed. 3. Opportunity to develop a"Standards Manual" for all infrastructure. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Construction standards -- i.e.,materials, testing, construction methods are changing. Ordinance has not changed. 2. Need flexibility in ordinance to develop new standards without the need to change the ordinance. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. NCTCOG Standards b. TxDOT Standards L.\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\UTILPOL2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 (t 3-22 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Drainage Master Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component XX , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead. Director of Public Works.481-5581. ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. The only infrastructure system without a Master Plan. 2. As the City develops, storm water runoff will become more critical. 3. Develop a CIP and maintenance plan. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Phase I, data collection is completed. 2. Because storm water crosses political boundaries, the City will need to coordinate with surrounding cities. 3. EPA- Clean Water Act and other environmental acts will impact decision. General Comments: Actual development of Master Plan has begun. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRM\DRAINMP2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 UI&-23 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Utility Placement Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX ,Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead. Director of Public Works. 481-5581. ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Location of improvements to public utilities within the City. 2. Lack of communication with Franchise holders (other utility companies). 3. Large number of utilities in City ROW. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Telecommunications Act may have impacted this area of control. 2. Utility companies have individual franchise agreements. 3. General Comments: Many meetings have been held with the utility companies jointly and individually. Utility companies do not want more regulations. City staff has received more cooperation since discussions started on a new ordinance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. L.\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORTMPROJ-REQ.FRM\UTILPLC2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Storm Water Utility District TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Whitehead. Director of Public Works.481-5581. ext. 740 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Need method of financing drainage improvements besides property tax. 2. Storm Water Master Plan is being developed which will define the drainage needs by basin and by creek branch. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Surrounding cities have already instituted such a drainage district. 2. 3. General Comments: Storm Water Utility District would also finance the engineering for the Master Plan along with capital improvements and maintenance. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Cities of Grapevine, Keller, Colleyville all have such districts. b. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROJ-REQ.FRMISTORM2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Lie SHORT TITLE: Park Dedication Ordinance- Fee Justification Study TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Kim Lenoir for SPDC STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Human. Interim Director of Parks and Recreation.481-5581. ext. DATE OF REQUEST: 1-26-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-26-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. The residential fee for park dedication was doubled this year. City Council said we would do a study to justify the actual fee that should be charged. Talk at the time was to include it in the upcoming Impact Fee Studies. 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Ordinance states a study will be done during budget process to determine value of raw acreage (section 7.03A). It does not specify the type of study to be done. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. L:\COMDEV\WP-FlLES\PROJECTS\PRIORITYIPROJ-REQ.FRM\PARKFEE2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM (kiire SHORT TITLE: Land Acquisition Plan for Ultimate Buildout of Park System TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component , Project XX Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman. Interim Director of Parks and Recreation,481-5581. ext. 757 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Need to identify all future land needed to acquire per the Parks Master Plan. Land acquisition remains number one priority for expenditures of SPDC funds. 2. ciroe 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Land acquisition plan needs to be in accordance with Park, Recreation& Open Space Master Plan, and existing parks and facilities. 2. 3. General Comments: • List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. 'e b. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTNRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRM\LANDACQI.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 ((& 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM (1%.,,, SHORT TITLE: Sidewalk Trail Implementation Plan TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Kim Lenoir for SPDC & Park Board Members STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman. Interim Director of Parks and Recreation. 481-5581. ext. 757 DATE OF REQUEST: 1-26-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-26-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. To prepare a plan for implementing trail and sidewalk construction per the master plan. Much like the sewer program. 2. 3. cope List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Trail and sidewalk construction should be tied into CIP for street construction. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. L:ICOMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PRO)-REQ.FRM\SIDE-IM2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 • PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM L„.. SHORT TITLE: Trail System Master Plan Update TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance ' , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Kim Lenoir for SPDC STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Hugman. Interim Director of Parks and Recreation. 481-5581, ext. 757 DATE OF REQUEST: 1-26-98 DATE RECEIVED: 1-26-98 BY: GL Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Per City Charter, the Trail System Master Plan needs to be reviewed and updated in four years. It was adopted in August 1995; therefore, by August 1999 the revisions should be completed. So by Fall 1998 this project should begin. 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. With recent development, P&Z needs further refinement and guidance as to which side of the road trails will be located. 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORI'MPROJ-REQ.FRM\TSMP-UP2.WPDQ�J gFnrm Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of I �'frT 1 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM SHORT TITLE: Health and Sanitation Ordinance TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New XX , Minor Revision ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Tarrant County Health Dept STAFF CONTACT: Paul Ward. Building Official. 481-5581. ext. 755 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Adopt ordinance similar to other cities as recommended by Tarrant Co. Health Dept. 2. Address food handlers training requirements 3. No all food establishments comply with health rules. L., List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Write ordinance providing requirements for food manager certification and food handler training certificates. 2. Compare similar Food Handler Ordinances of other cities in the area. 3. General Comments: According to the Tarrant Co. Health Dept.,most food establishments comply voluntarily. Ordinance would bring all food establishments up to current health standards. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Grapevine b. Euless c. River Oaks (Ordinance No. 414) L:\COMDEV\WP-flLES\PROJECTS\PRIOR1TY\PROJ-REQ.FRM\HEALTH2.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 I(g-30 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM. Li . SHORT TITLE: Lighting Standards (Includes Street Lights) (60% complete) TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New X , Minor Revision , Major Revision Type: Ordinance X , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: Pam Muller. ex-Councilmember STAFF CONTACT: Chuck Bloomberg.Plans Examiner.481-5581. ext. 747 DATE OF REQUEST: 10/23/96 DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Add section on"Lighting Standards"to the zoning ordinance 2. Address the adjacency issues between residential and nonresidential developments. As it pertains to street lights: 1. Control glare. 2. Enhance country atmosphere of community, while providing safe lighting. 3. Driving safety,provide visibility without blinding lights. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Establish measurable (enforceable) standards to assist building inspections and code enforcement. As it pertains to street lights: 1. Limit candlepower. 2. Shield light direction. 3. Floodlights, searchlights. General Comments: Take into consideration zoning categories, light direction, parking lots,buildings, athletic stadiums/fields, parks. List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. As it pertains to street lights: a. Town of Kennebunkport b. City of Plano c. Maine study 4444.10, L:ICOMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRM\LIGHT3.WPD May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 �(&-31 PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Le SHORT TITLE: Noise Ordinance Update TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New_, Minor Revision XX , Major Revision Type: Ordinance XX , Master Plan Component , Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Paul Ward. Building Official. 481-5581. ext. 755 DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem, concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Provisions are needed for measuring noise in area covered by Noise Control Ordinance. 2. Add section on standards for noise control to give a clear definition of noise violations. 3. Lie, List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. Establish standards to assist those responsible for the enforcement of noise control. 2. Standards as it pertains to noise violations: Tools, instruments, examples How to measure. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. Grapevine b. Existing Ordinance No. 484 c. Plano L:\COMDEV\WP-HLES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PROD-REQ.FRM\NOISE2.WPD Forth Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 It$-32- PROJECT ADVOCACY FORM Please fill out the following information related to your request for consideration of a project, ordinance P J or revision to an existing ordinance. A disk copy of this form can be provided to allow you to insert your comments in typed form. Contact Lori Farwell in Community Development at(817)481-5581, ext 744. SHORT TITLE: TYPE OF PROJECT: Scope: New , Minor Revision ,Major Revision Type: Ordinance , Master Plan Component ,Project Other: REQUESTED BY: CC , P&Z , ZBA , PB , STAFF , OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: DATE OF REQUEST: DATE RECEIVED: BY: Outline problem,concern or opportunity. (Do not define solution) 1. Le 2. 3. List any potential considerations. (Do not define solution) 1. • 2. 3. General Comments: List any references to be reviewed (other cities, etc.) or any documents attached to this request. a. b. c. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECfS\PRIORTTY\PRO)-REQ.FRIMNBLANKS.WPD Form Date:May 29,1998 Page 1 of 1 116-33 k i i ! VISTA TRAIL COUNTRY ESTATES i .ts'• J J ! t')l+�Ai.J t %Rtt;VOL ¢ 8 95.E �" ZONEEi: SF-20 T Ault:) MF• _ I s WANDA99�}LEW4 ( n ! ) T 8 ErOL 4 3 7 4 P- , . 7Ei } ; j i'JT ikJ LOT ! ✓ �0 9 W. P . 1 . C . a . I , _ _ ._ _ _ •_ _. . i AT A9� A h t 7 j xrs,} I t 3 } CT 17 t 425' ZONt-C,� SF -LLD k e l ' t i q I i I f t WINDSOR F 1REST" ESTAFES k �' t 50�? FPHA '�t�t��`�T PHrtL'I�IEl�i...il.. !i PHASE I i Vv» 388-204 PC 42 Pf, fi CT I I VOi 186-170 , PG 74 PRTC T s i i } 1 � iNE 430 � FiORINMR0AU (ULMA79 t__.......... )) 50.0016 0 V_ Q � f Wr cc � 1 z 0 L. I Al a z m 0 01 O r a v) o . w 0 o Uj o 50. 00 z Cr I 20' 35.00' RUSSELL S T AAT IS V0t 7PCA , P-1) .65C No t FLORENCE Z O J J o a PROJECT �' o a LOCATION o a JOHNSON N W E S En SOUTHLAKE 4 c� BOULEVARD i543 80 ' N89 '32' 00 "E - - --- - - ROM DEDICATION ROM DEDICATION - - 117' 104' 104' 104 104 107 f08' _. _.__ _ �,_ ] _ _____- JAWS 4. MARTNI 0 • i1"E id2f' f04' 4' f 0' 200' _ e:Xl i iNG IC) U a _ ASEAt,ENT I DOR1S MARTIN f �- I VOL. j0123, r''.S. 1578, .O.R. T .r. T i ABI�JET A , SLIDE 32 PR TCT TO BF ABA 4E D m I 15 o I CD o m 20030 s f _ EtJ4�' MEDIUM f;EAI ;I T Y Bloch 1tn Block 1 I m A ti Ln Blocs 2 ( In o IN 12 �' ac 5 6 �t 7 !� 8 9 10 11 0, v 1 2 L 3 4 2860 s f P' 20033 s f �� 20033 s f ,0 20033 s f ,� 20033 s f opt 20033 s f �� 20009 s f �m 20020 s f io 21400 s f 22800 s f iN 22560 s f is 24500 s f cQv Z w 200 ID i N i I m kn i !#3MH$ J. HAP7 AND WF c I m Q to oII , 1 20756 sf t�'"' M 35'BL —. 35'BL S Z0. key` . ...................... .........CAT '� I t.t ME�:�I+ DENSITY toe......................... D TREE C ] 07 ' — — — 104 ' •----_____ —1=tE A V • TREE f20'- _ - 104 - -104= '�' IdD(}NDSt1.DRIVB_ -- 104'_ ]04' = ]75' •.... .-.L.. ... F4.000 ' _ -- 1 .-- --- --- - • • ' E` MO�aA,�Oft , i. 104'- -- 800' �- SO Q DOR THY KLVA �lii(}�� 4 - -'------ -- ---- - R-- - VOL. ` `� `.0 , fj' ? 1-8 . i1 P T . ` --132 - -134'--134'-5 - - 1�' -94' _ ,• ..... --�` ]00' S.0 ]00 \ EL►3: M !I�`M [5f:rv;SiTY 35'BL v E R 35'BL �� ` 85 ' 13 I E GO II •• --- 29728 sf ' UD Block 2 �•• � I ' ' Cal N � 4 •• P 5 1 6 7 8 10 11 Ja P. h(ARTIN 1 2 3 I 9 Vnt K C. J , � . � I ;� .I �� , ( 1 r_�. .�889, i'G. FiOC, D.F?...{,.T. nIRW I. 4 f IN 30165' s f 30054 s f 1 N 23491 s f IN 22150 s f iN 21700 s f iN 20050 sf Ig 20500 s f IN 22187 sf �o \ ' SG\ w 30000 sf N 300 3 s I 12 N \ I ZONED, Mti i m 30019 s f •' • ( t w 3267H sf 'so \ o i.tJfJ: MEO;iJ4 i3EN5ITY Io ROBER r CARPEF � \ cn VOL 595" . PG 318 DDT C i ZONED: MH s I I 1-I10: MEDT;M OEN aTTY !00' !00' 100' 136 134 134- 134' 139' 100' 100' 75 DE . __.- __ _ __ __ R56.50 690.50 � • FNJ POINT OF S s� i { Ji f FIE 5LIOUR Ni 521 AM TIOf Cob A. Sii, t82.5 PRTC;T PERK P . CIARMACK. E T UX CARO,- J. GARMA F, NOTE: NO LOT WITHIN THIS ADDITION SHALL BE ALLOWED DRIVEWAY ACCESS ONTO PEARSON LANE OR FLORENCE ROAD. L"A S GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=60' 0 60 120 180 NOTES: 1. THE SUBJECT SITE DOES NOT LIE WITHIN A FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AS DEFINED AND DELINEATED BY FEMA MAP NO 48439CO1.80, DA ED AUGUST 2, 1995. 2. SIDEWALKS ACROSS THE FRONTAGE OF EACH LOT WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE INDIVIDUAL BUILDERS AT THE TIME OF HOME CONSTRUCTION. VISTA TRAIL. A IT ON E!__00< 3 ,. /\ BEGMING f r 1 q ui i 1_•_JT �, pk t,* !._.< < iL 4+ c. `f .J 01 ' + i r_U 11 j 0 ,1 Ss l ._... .._ ..._ .. ... .. _........ _....._._-... ___._. _...___.. Vh I V EJVttAR?`.' K . kAC#�I�` "'} j LOT %G } !�!i"�i�1 :E C. 6G�VlvtA'+i ROD A. G tGEP .-': , ` ,• 1 AND ' C.TLtX � ET;JX ZONED' SF 1 fi ~ '`t~d r C, "F< 11. MGi tN CARL 0, STUTSMAN rINDY BOWMAN _,ENICk: K . GE+GFR /' t Lt l Oil tlE! j l t AND t ! f /\` ,".R r t > hjl !r, p t WANDA ` , STUTSMAN i -..._%`\ � i 1't"'i.. 8 651 PG. !(a?, D. R,T. LOT ?3 �G fl: 5F20bZONED, `�#! � i At VA P. HORN r' T� r �! 1.UO: MEDIUM D NSITY I PLUG: MEDIUM DENSITY � �\ t�A4�� ��. Ef�.ON � I 4, �T r' C. t } tM 1` u.M, D4AKE. AND 4hiiFE MhdiM.h"'F#'•.A�L t a j �( �3y��i��3Ayf/t+A �; , y�uRt��yKE ' ..__.... r 1.-.._.._....,..y,_... V �+JL 1 i 1� 0, P 4 755D. R i. 1.. T LOT 16 ED Lf"WANDOWSK31 � LOT 8 t3R._0 C,K 4 CURTtS COWAN Y-OX E, r 1iX :',04NA LIEWAIW_ * rl i FRI DIF M,NE RE:E7{}iCK WAYN!f_ J i ARLr--y Ci_Al t iA J_ COWAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING a 17.083 acre tract of land in the JJ Freshour Survey, Abstract No 521 situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being that portion of land conveyed to VT Cross by deed recorded in Volume 5893, Page 250 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 112" iron pipe found at the Northeast corner of Lot 22, Block 3 of Vista Trail Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 388-95. Page 3 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S89'53'30"W along the North line of Block 3 of said Vista Trail Addition, 656.50 feet to a 112" iron pin found, said pin found at the Northeast corner of Lot 1 of the Freshour No 521 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1825 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas: THENCE S89'47'01"W along the North line of said JJ Freshour No 521 Addition, 690.50 feet to a 112" iron pin set: THENCE N00'01'08"W, 477.69 feet to a 112" iron pin set; THENCE N89'32'00"E, 1543.80 feet to a 112" iron pin found at the Northwest corner of that tract of land conveyed to James H. Martin and wife Doris Martin by deed recorded in Volume 10123, Page 1578 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S00'24'04"E along the West line of said Martin tract, 486.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 744,117 square feet or 17.083 acres of land. ($ 12 1' I1) I:.1 V.T. DEAN CROSS 50 Willow Bend Gary, Texas 7W3 (903) 695-2333 Quantitative Land Use Schedule Phase Existing Land Use Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Number of Units Gross Acreage Density -DU /Gross Area Open Space Area/% I VACANT SF - IA SF - 20A 27 17.083 1.58 0 PREPARED BY: DEVELOPED BY: FRED JOYCE — MARY MYERS ENTERPRISES, Inc. 1017 W.D. Tate Avenue Grapevine, TX 76051 office (817) 481-3516 fax (817) 481-4593 CIVIL ENGINEERS •-• PLANNERS •-• SURVEYORS 6001 Bridge Street, Suite 100, Fort Worth Texas 76112 Metro (817) 429-4373 Fax (817) 446-3116 t' A , TES WOODS BEING 17.083 Acres STTUATM IN THE J.J. FRESHOUR SURVEY ABSTRACT No. 521 CITY OF SO , TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 27 MIDENnAL LOrI'S Sheet 1 of 3 CD m m N t` N N D MAY 2 61999