480-788CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
ORDINANCE NO. 480-788
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS LOT 4, BLOCK 1,
PECAN CREEK ADDITION, SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.25 ACRES AND MORE FULLY
AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "S-P-2"
GENERALIZED SITE PLAN ZONING DISTRICT TO "S-P-2"
GENERALIZED SITE PLAN ZONING DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON
THE APPROVED CONCEPT/SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL
WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS
HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use
of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes,
and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "S-P-2"
Generalized Site Plan Zoning District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 1
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called
by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether
these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians
using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect
of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs
and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width
for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this
ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and
off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to
control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air;
effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on
transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the
land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 2
existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air,
prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates
the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there
is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that
there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity
to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were
originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for
the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at
large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety
and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Lot 4, Block 1, Pecan Creek Addition, Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, being approximately 2.25 acres, and more fully and completely
described in Exhibit "A" from "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan Zoning District, to "S-
P-2" Generalized Site Plan Zoning District as depicted on the approved
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 3
Concept/Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," and
subject to the following conditions:
S-P-2 REGULATIONS
M. J. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES,
8233 MID -CITIES BOULEVARD, SUITE A
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TX 76182
0: 817.268.5555 FAX: 817.268.5558
MJWOWWRIGHT.COM WWW.MJWRIGHT.COM
October 15, 2021
Planning and Development Services
City of Southlake
1400 Main Street, Suite 310
Southlake, Texas 76092
RE: Site Plan Summary Letter
Mayor and City Council,
We are submitting the Zena Rucker Road Office Park Project at 731 Zena Rucker Road, Southlake, Texas for
consideration. This office park contains 2 single -story office buildings, with building #1 being 11,316 square feet
and building #2 being 11,170 square feet. The total square footage for the property is 22,486 square feet. All
buildings are to be constructed at one time. The current zoning on the property is "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan
District and we propose "S-P-2" zoning for the property with the base zoning district being "0-1" Office District
with the following exceptions:
Development Regulations:
• The 20,987 square feet total building floor area is proposed to be broken down to 1 parking space to 226
square foot of building, which requires a total of 93 spaces.
• The percentage of existing tree canopy to be preserved is 63.3%.
Variances Requested:
1. Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking depth of 50'. A variance
is requested to allow a stacking depth of approximately 41'-0" for the west driveway and 43'-9" for the
east driveway.
2. Zoning Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 33.19 and Subdivision Ord. No 483, as amended, Section
5.06 a variance request to allow no trail to be constructed from Zena Rucker to the south property line.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. WRIGHT - PRESIDENT, CGA, CGP, CAPS
M. J. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TEXAS ARCHITECT REGISTRATION NO. 11130
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 4
City Council motion for approval on November 16, 2021:
November 16, 2021- Approved at 2"d reading (7-0) subject to the staff report dated
November 9, 2021 and Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 7, dated October 26,
2021 (incorrectly referred to in the motion as Revised Concept/Site Plan Review
Summary No. 6, dated October 26, 2021) and approving two variances:
Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking
depth of 50'. A variance is requested to allow a stacking depth of approximately
41'-0" for the west driveway and 43'-9" for the east driveway
Zoning Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 33.19 and Subdivision Ord. No. 483,
as amended, Section 5.06 which require an 8' multiuse trail to be extended to the
south property line per the Master Pathways Plan. A variance is requested to allow
no trail to be constructed from Zena Rucker to the south property line.
Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 7, dated October 26, 2021
Planning Review
The Concept/Site Plan must conform to the underlying zoning district.
2. Please make the following changes to the Concept/Site Plan:
a. Revise the title to Concept/Site Plan instead of Site Plan.
b. Label each building as Medical/General Office instead of Professional Office if medical
uses and general office uses are proposed.
c. The symbol for sidewalks in the hatch legend is not shown on the sidewalks on the plan.
d. Please check the lot area that you are showing because the plat shows the lot area to
be 98,104 square feet, or 2.2522 acres.
3. Provide color elevations revised to show the corrected building heights (18'-2" for Building 1 and
17'-7" for Building 2).
4. The Master Pathways Plan shows an existing 8' multi -use trail along the south side of Zena
Rucker Rd. and extending south from the east property line of the lot. A variance is requested
to allow no trail to be constructed.
5. Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking depth of 50'.
A variance is requested to allow a stacking depth of approximately 41'-0" for the west driveway
and 43'-9" for the east driveway.
The monument sign shown on the plan is not approved as part of this "S-P-2" request. All signs
must comply with Sign Ordinance No. 704, as amended. Approval of a separate sign permit is
required for all signs.
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 5
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
If the development were proposed with straight zoning the proposed preservation of the existing
tree cover would not comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the
Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 10.1 % of existing tree cover on the property and a
minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. A maximum of 63.3% of
the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing
tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum
existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
reserved*
0% — 20%
70%
20.1 — 40%
60%
40.1 % - 60%
50%
60.1 % - 80%
40%
80.1 % - 100%
30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights -of -way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning
Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council
regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council
finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 6
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
All bufferyards are required to be 5' Type `A' per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended,
Section 42. The Site Plan and Landscape Plans L-1A and L-1 show Type `A' bufferyards on the
west and south property lines, a 20' Type 'E' bufferyard on the north property line and a 20' Type
`C' bufferyard on the east property line, which exceeds the minimum requirements of the
Landscape Ordinance.
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Development Engineer Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of the
civil construction plans.
WATER/SEWER COMMENTS:
2. Water meters and associated service lines shall be of the same size.
3. The proposed sewer service lines are labeled as a 6" SS service, however, the Legend shows
it as an 8". Please update to match.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
4. The provided infiltration values seem low. Please verify that these values are from the most
current iSWM manual, updated in April 2020 (see current values below).
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 7
iSWM-rm Technical Manual
Table 5.15 AMS-based precipitation frequency estimates for Tarrant County (inches)
Hydrology
Duration
Average recurrence interval (years)
1
2
5
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000
5-min
0.405
0.439
0.572
0.673
0.807
0.909
1.012
1.117
1.261
1.371
10-min
0.649
0.704
0.919
1.081
1.297
1.462
1.627
1.791
2.008
2.171
15-min
1 0.807
0.875
1.137
1.336
1.601
1.801
2.004
2.212
2.493
2.711
30-min
1.117
1.210
1 1.570
1.842
1 2.203
2.475
1 2.752
3.041
3.436
3.746
60-min
1.449
1.572
2.047
2.408
2.888
3.248
3.619
4.011
4.553
4.983
2-hr
1.773
1.935
2.555
3.031
3.671
4.159
4.669
5.215
5.977
6.588
3-hr
1.966
2.154
2.871
3.423
4.173
4.752
5.361
6.013
6.930
7.668
6-hr
2.323
2.558
3.446
4.135
5.077
5.810
6.586
1 7.419
1 8.591
1 9.536
12-hr
2.733
1 3.016
1 4.089
4.919
6.051
6.928
7.852
8.840
10.224
11.336
24-hr
3.191
1 3.522
1 4.776
5.747
7.069
8.096
9.175
10.321
11.921
13.201
The existing drainage easement onsite shall be revised based on the proposed floodplain
revisions and/or LOMR. Per the City Drainage Ordinance creeks and channels shall be located
within a drainage easement sized based on the 100-year based flood elevation plus 1-foot of
freeboard.
Underground detention shall be located within a dedicated drainage easement. This drainage
easement can be combined with the drainage easement for the creek if they overlap.
Based on conversations with ICON Consulting Engineers, FEMA is in the process of revising
their base flood maps which will place a large portion of this property within the flood zone AE.
A flood study can be provided to City and FEMA for review and approval to revise the newly
created floodplain boundaries and remove a portion of the proposed property from the
floodplain. The flood study shall follow all requirements within the City Floodplain Ordinance
and the iSWM manual and shall ensure that there are no adverse impacts on the downstream
properties.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist to the
Public Works Department through the online customer self service portal located here: CSS
(cityofsouthlake. com). Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to
the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are
located on the City's website:
http://www.cityofsouthiake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
httns://www.citvofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Manaaement-for-Construction-S. SWPPP
shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 8
Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared
by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
A Developer Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement
on the City Council agenda for consideration.
*=Denotes informational comment that don't need to be addressed until Civil Construction Submittals.
Fire Department Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located
on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length
of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in
a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is located in a vault, or a
minimum of 6'X6' if it is located on the riser. (Building #2 appears to have the riser located where
the total linear length of pipe is in excess of 100 feet from the city water main, which would
require an underground vault for the double check valves)
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting was held on August 24, 2021. A Corridor Planning Committee was held on
August 23, 2021.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from rights -of -way and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a, a fully corrected site
plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all
required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,
Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 9
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
Denotes Informational Comment
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described
shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing
sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning
Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and
affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to
both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable
future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-
crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and
complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the
district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value
of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 10
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and
that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described
herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the
balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as
to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in
court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be
prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance
in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 11
thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides
for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City
Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10)
days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 2"d day of November, 2021.
M
T R ,
A TEST:
CITYCT1�1 .
v:
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2"d reading the 16th day,Af Novortiber, 2021.
M R
®� w H LA fah'
)`
C)
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 12
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CITY ATTO R E
DATE:
ADOPTED:
EFFECTIVE. 12� 12l
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 13
EXHIBIT "A"
Lot 4, Block 1, Pecan Creek an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas,
according to the plat filed in Cabinet A, Slides 10956 and 10957 on March 24, 2006 at the plat
records of Tarrant County, Texas.
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 14
EXHIBIT "B"
CONCEPT/SITE PLAN
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 15
SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART
SITE DATA CHART
EXlsTWCs ZONING
SP-2
PROPOSED ZONING
SP-2
LAND USE DESIGNATION
OFFICE/COMMERCIAL
GROSS ACREAGE
2255 ACRES (W,210 SOFT.)
NET ACREAGE
2255 ACRES
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS
1
nRCENT OF SITE COVERAGE
38%
ARIA OF OPEN SPACE
36,834 Wr-T.
PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE
38%
AREA OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
61,316 SOFT.
PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
62%
BUILDING AREA (GROSS)
22,486 SOFT.
NUMBER OF STORIES
1 STORY
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
BLDG. I = 187" / BLDG. 2 = 1-11"
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA (NET)
2058'1 SOFT.
REQUIRED PARKING (I PARKING
SPACES PER 226SQ.FT.)
20W-1 SOFT/ I PARKING SPACE PER 226 S01=T.
= W SPACES
PROVIDED PARKING (PER 5-P-2)
W SPACES
STANDARD PARKING
HANDICAP PARKING
TOTAL PARKING
88 SPACES
5 SPACES
W SPACES
REQUIRED LOADING SPACES
1-10'X50' 4 1-101X25'
PROVIDED LOADING SPACES
1-10'X50' 4 1-10'X25'
AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE
NONE
ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE
OF DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCTION START DATE
CONSTRUCTION END DATE
ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT
NOVEMBER 1, 2021
JULY 30, 2022
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 16
ELEVATIONS BUILDING 2
UMO. MINE
i L
SOUTH ARTICULATION DIAGRAM
r
ffaai-mm��
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 18
ELEVATIONS BUILDING 2
pppF'
NO
FOR APF%DVQ- OM-T
-NO
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 19
ELEVATIONS BUILDING 1
Mimi"
"ll simls
I$IWARTICULATIONDIAGRAM
�AT�
FORAFPROVAL ONLY
NM FOR CI"TM=ICN-
tYh whew oan
1 OAn
-
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 20
ELEVATIONS BUILDING 1
........ . . ....
--EAST ELEVATION
FORAPPROVAL014-Y
-NOT FOR 0"MiCTIGN-
EAST -ARTICULATION DIAGRAM
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 21
TREE CONSERVATION PLAN
q`
Dqi
mOC
`
LOT 2R, BLOCK I
PECAN CREEK
,6 a
I s t
O ^�
DOC. NO. D206085503
P.R.T.C.T.
OWNER:HCP CRS2 LTACH-BAYLOR SOUTHLAKE
ZONING: SPI
LUD: OFFICE/COMMERCIAL —�
40'%IO' SITE
ZENA RUCKER ROAD
—40'%ID' SITE
'VISIBILITY
TRIANGLE
60' CONCRETE R.O.W.
VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
101
20' BUFF \
NT BUILDIN
So- Ws
102
15' SIDE
176
N rc a
BUILDING LINE
175 /
159
7
OmU m
103
-
i
a
105-
11,170 SOFT.
I�INGLE STORY
1 1
(
u
1
I®ICK BLDG. 12
I
I= 023
107L
10 .MA%. BLOG. HT
PROF. OFFICE
'd
I
I
o Ci
t
165
/
a a
109
„6
I69 168 I ��1,,,j16,j SOFT.
Q J W �-
SIF1l:LE STORY
BRICK BUILDING
m
110
/1
25'1' BUILDING HT.
w
J
PROF. OFFICE
153
c0i
I J
if2
rnF
jI4
U�UK
wZ
I
I
29..o 0
YON� U
'd
3
i---------
------ - �- ------------------'I�
41
/w---------
1-•---1-------I _ i
114
1151161 7
123
PAD
124 1%12 128
130 1 1 132 13 1 5 1 7 19 14O 1d114J 146 1i84
11151
LEGEND
499
QO)EXISTING
TREE TO BE PRESERVED/PROTECTED
499
EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED BY PERMIT
������1•����
LOCATION OF PROTECTIVE FENCE
TOTAL
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES
458"
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES PRESERVED
305"
66.6%
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES REMOVED
153"
33.4%
BUILDING PAD (EXEMPT
0"
(0%)
PARKING LOT (EXEMPT)
77"
16.8%)
ROADS EXEMPT
76"
16.6%
OTHER NON-EXEMPT
0'.
0%
TOTAL SITE AREA = 98,212 SF
EXISTING CANOPY COVERAGE = 9,935 SF
PERCENT CANOPY COVERAGE = 10.1 %
CANOPY PRESERVATION PER CITY STANDARD= 70%
TOTAL CANOPY PRESERVED = 6,289 SF
PERCENT OF CANOPY PRESERVED = 63.3%
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 22
LANDSCAPE PLAN
2) cXA
+ a-
I IULAICRA
4• .
OWNER:
LOT 2R, BLOCK I
PECAN CREEK
DOC. NO. 0206085503
P.R.T.C.T.
HCP CRS2 LTACH-BAYLOR SOUTHLAKE
ZONING: SP1
LUD: OFFICE/COMMERCIAL
low
<
N c
rl
1) GVE sm
---
T C•.\
CIu
_
ISIVR
4 9 .\
II+I XE6 YE2 It•'^ '
59x.
llt
WENRIII
ga.
D'X10, $ LAG flED 191
ZENA RUCKER ROAD
40'X10* SITE
_
rcJL
VI IIITY AN + a•I
WESHU I+I
60' CONCRETE R.O.W.
VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
OiVRCHA
O
La
Un
O
OflES IJI
1-
n
m
Z 7
4
45 qx.
15)CER T%A
SCE
M 6Y 3�J
N N
O� tyi
15' SIDE
IIIUW PM
rcx.
e9
11411LENAN ILE CRS IB21
ULMcR (1) I1 LE 5(41
Sax. sea.
OUE 11R,61'
m
n,
�6n7
BUILDING LINE
1RENAN
T)
sax.
(s)OUEVIlk
rCx.
Il ILE NMI IJI NES VE2
+'ca
IUN EA6(121
H'
14)CER T%A
sgx.
4•Cx.
59x. 5aa1.
rCx.
A•
z9b.,
JiFEFt $D.FT.
(11UU.1 PAR
CER T%A 141
O
U.
K •KOn
¢¢W
1JIOUEVIR'TDRY
Cx.
S
J-�
t
a h 2 1]
F OJONJ
B!.�P BLDG. /2
1])ILE LDG,H
UE VIR 12
l'Cal
.
FWFi
s A"JF. OFFICE
a�
14111LE NAN
IPARIU
F
- Q
�.
'd
11,316 SO.FT. sg•L
SINGLE STORY ILE c1s161
rcx.
NAN I eT1
u
w
OME CRs
BRICK BUILDING #1 5gx.
S07
w �
LAG
+59x.
5gx.
IJIIAGREJ
25'1" BUILDING HT. LAG REJIJI
PROF. OFFICE 459x,
2)ULM PA
O
1 J
4 qel.
ILE NAN IBI
UG RED IL NAN 9
Cx. -
N1a.
(11UWCRA
I8I (]TI
9x gx.
.m6 �
(JI ILE 6A2
4 SM
Wz ZZZ
OOj
11611LE
-
q
`d
11411LE AN
3
(el RE CR6
5 ga
59x.
W
_ ---
3
111LE NEL
WESHU (/ TER AD tO W
,11 OUE VIR 121 LLE SA2
ITICER TXA IJI OVE 6NU
r Cal.
111 U1A1CM
1210ERTXA
4'Ci 45 gaL
J'Cal. rce,
J•Cx.
J'Cx.
IJI
EVIR
PLANT SCHEDULE
TREES CODE 9—Ty BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE HEIGHT SPACING REMARKS
qDCER TXA 22 Canis canedensls Iex — Texos Reahud 0- Cel. 8' Sv1gle 50aghl Think
ILE SA2 5 Ilex x eeeleaut, evanneh' Savannah Hotly 459M 8' Multi Trunk
JUN EAS 12 Ju,kpaus v.W— Easlem ReWceda 2' Cal 8'.10' HI. As Shawn
LAG RE8 18 LegersVoa he mdua'Rad Red Crape Myles Muhl-Tmak 45 ggl. 8J l0 5 canes
LAG E. ii Lagersugenve wNCB x lewrei'Tuuarag' Tuscmae Crape Myale khxi-Think 45 gx. 8' J le 5 cares
OUESHU 10 Cuawssh—m. Shumaid Oak YCx. 10'Min. Single Straight Tmak
OUE VIR 18 Ouercus vxgmlena Saulhem LNa Oak 4' Cal 12' Height Mx Swgb Slmght Them
ULM CRA 5 Uenus uassdolw Cade, Elm 4' Cal. 12' Haight Min St"a Sla ght Tmak
• ULM PAR T UYnus 01,11 a Locwhak E. 2-Cx. 10' MI,.
VIT CHA 10 Vilex g..-as., Chaste The 45 gal 8' Mulll Tmak
SHRUBS CODE 9—Ty BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE HEIGHT SPACING REMARKS
HES YE2 23 Haspamloo p-dWm YeMw' Yeg Yucca 50x. I8.24' 48'0C
• ILE CRS too Ikx —ter Catssa' Cut—Chkwse HPgy 5gal 18'.24' 38'0C
® ILE RAN 262 Ilex vamlaw Nana' Dwell Yaupon HOBy 5gx. IB'-24' 36. O.C.
• ILE NEL IB Ilexx Nike R. Stevens' Nellie R. Stevens HNty 10 gx. 48'0.C.
GROUND COVERS CODE ON BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE HEIGHT SPACING SPACING REMARKS
® CYN DAC -,1-sl Crodondectykn Remade Grass Solid Sad
■ LIR BIG 2,-1sI--musca,l'Sig Bko Bg Bke LlNwo .Pools 12'OC
NAS PON 905 sl Na-.-lenussime'Ppay Tails Perry Tess, Mexican F--Gass 4• pots 24.O.0
■ SEA CAN -1 sl Seasonal Cak, Sensorwl Cole, 4• Pats 91
■ TRAASI 1.182 st Tmchakspxmum pswhcum-.a-Jasnune 4-pots 12'0C
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 23
LANDSCAPE PLAN
LOT 2R, BLOCK I
•. .CAN.CREEK
ZONING: SPI
LUD: OFFICE/COMMERCIAL
04)HESM OS��
,.,.
ROAD.
9.
�a�o.a.,.ogis��
+r ��
.
11
���
I■,
�■�1�[►��M
` �__"��w
!�)
:�IIII�asr
,.`q�►
q�.
.
'
0
�
O••
INGLE
v■�::�w�.e���.�•--m•-�rwasir��raa��wci��m�r��-rt.���:��s:�+���rnil�
�#���•R'�'�
_WW
_vim=
_�� �L.�
�—�w_
�
Ordinance No. 480-788 Page 24
1
, cra,, z_io_ti.vq.e.
Beaufort Gazette The Herald-•Rock Hill el Nuevo Herald-Miami Sun News-Myrtle Beach
Belleville News-Democrat Herald Sun-Durham Modesto Bee The News Tribune Tacoma
Bellingham Herald Idaho Statesman Raleigh News&Observer The Telegraph-Macon
Bradenton Herald Island Packet The Olympian San Luis Obispo Tribune
®.�MCCLATCI fY Centre Daily Times Kansas City Star Sacramento Bee Tri-City Herald
Charlotte Observer Lexington Herald-Leader Fort Worth Star-Telegram Wichita Eagle
Columbus Ledger-Enquirer Merced Sun-Star The State-Columbia
Fresno Bee Miami Herald Sun Herald-Biloxi
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Account# Order Number Identification Order PO Amount Cols Depth
36037 163186 Print Legal Ad-IPL0047185 22200127 $99.04 1 63 L
Attention: Tara Brooks THE STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE COUNTY OF TARRANT
1400 MAIN ST '
STE 440 Before me,a Notary Public in and for said County
SOUTHLAKE,TX 760927604 and State,this day personally appeared Amanda
- Grisham,Bid and Legal Coordinator for the Star-
Telegram,published by the Star-Telegram,Inc.at
PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE, Fort Worth,in Tarrant County,Texas;and who,
F CITY O SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS_ - - _ --------
after beingdui sworn,did depose and say that
Notice is hereby given to all interest- - -
Y p y
persons that the Cityof Southlake, ' PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
ed
pCITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS the attached clipping of an advertisement was
Texas,will consider the following items Notice Is hereby'glven to all interest
in the Council Chambers at Town Hall, ed persons that the City of Southlake, published in the above named paper on the listed
1400,Main Street Southlake, Texas
for: 'Texas,will consider the following items dates:
The City Council on Tuesday,Novem= ,in the Council Chambers at Town Hall,
ber 16,2021,at 5:30 p.m.will hold a 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas 'I
public hearing and consider: for: ,
Ordinance No. 480-464E, (ZA20- ,The City Council on Tuesday,Novem- No.of Insertions: 1
0029),Zoning Change and Develop- 'ber 16,2021,at 5:30 p.m.will hold a
ment Plan for Carillon Parc on prop- •public hearing and consider: Beginning Issue of: 10/29/2021
erty•described as Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, Ordinance No. 480-464E, (ZA20-
1F,1G,3A,3A01,3A03,3A04,3A04A, .0029),Zoning Change and Develop-
3A05, and 3A01B, Larkin H. Chiv- 'merit Plan for Carillon Parc on prop- Ending Issue of: 10/29/2021
ers Survey,Abstract No.300,•City of erty described as Tracts 1, 1D, 1 E,
Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas and :1 F,1G,3A;3A01,3A03,3A04,3A04A, I /) o ,-.. //I
located at 1775, 1781 and 1801 N. 3A05, and 3A01 B, Larkin H. Chiv-, ° (�I �U( `�f(Iv/)
White Chapel Blvd.,1840 Riviera Ln., ers Survey,Abstract No.300,City of I
201 E.Kirkwood;Blvd., 1700 N.Car- Southlake,Tarrant,County,Texas and I
roll Ave. T mane as 1900 N.Car- .White
at 1 and v1801 N. , Li�V ._ 7 S groll byAve.' Tarrent'Appraisal District) White Chapel Blvd.,1840 Riviere.Ln., ;
and 100 through 300 E. State Hwy. 1201 E:Kirkwood Blvd.,•1700 N.Car-
114,generally located east of N.White I roll Ave. (addressed as 1900 N.Car- 1
Blvd., Blvd., south of E Kknorth and' 0. Appraisal0 . tto Hwy.
/ g0 / / 1-7 GI
Blvd.,west of Riviera Ln.,and north ,and'100 through 300 E. State Hwy. [__l/I U l/!/,I of E.State Hwy.'114.Current Zoning: •114,generally located east of N.White
"ECZ" Employment Center Zoning 'Chapel Blvd., south of E: Kirkwood I
District.Proposed Zoning:"ECZ"Em- ,Blvd.,west of Riviera Ln.,and north •q
ployment Center Zoning District.SPIN of E.State'Hwy..114.Current Zoning:
Neighborhood#3. •"ECZ"- Employment Center Zoning, . •
Ordinance No.480-788,(ZA21-0072), District.Proposed Zoning:"ECZ"'Em- r
Zoning Change and Concept/Site .ployment Center Zoning District SPIN 0 fr 11
Plan for Zena Rucker Road Office Neighborhood#3.
Park on property.described as Lot 4, 'Ordinance No.480-788,(ZA21-0072),.
Block 1,Pecan Creek,an addition to 'Zoning 'Change and Concept/Site Sworn to and subscribed before me this 29th day of
the City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Plan for Zena Rucker Road Office
Texas and located at 731 Zena Rucker October in the year of 2021
Rd.,Southlake,Texas.Current Zoning: 7 Park on property described as Lot 4,
"S-P-2"Generalized Site Plan District Block 1,Pecan Creek,an addition to
Proposed Zoning: "S-P-2" General- the'City of Southlake,Tarrant County,
ized Site Plan District.SPIN Neighbor- rr Texas and located at 731 Zena Rucker•
hood#9. I,Rd.,Southlake,Texas.Current Zoning:
Ordinance No. 480-647a (ZA21- I'S-P-2"Generalized Site Plan District.
0080),Zoning Change and Site Plan Proposed Zoning: "S-P-2-General-
for Mody Southlake,on property de- ized Site Plan District:•SPIN Neighbor •
scribed as Lot 2,Block i,Gumm Sci- , hood#9.
fres Addition,an addition to the City of Ordinance No. 480-647a (ZA21- S 'ae.14/ /G�
Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas and 0080),Zoning Change and Site Plan
located'at 2101 E. Southlake Blvd., 'for Mody Southlake,on property de-
Southlake,Texas.Current Zoning:"S- scribed as Lot 2,Block 1,Gumm Sci-•
P-1"Detailed Site Plan District.,Pro- fres Addition;an addition to the City of, Notary Public in and for the state of Texas,residing in
posed Zoning:"S-P-1" Detailed Site Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas and Dallas County
Plan District.SPIN Neighborhood#8. located at 2101 E. Southlake Blvd.,
All interested persons are urged to Southlake,Texas.Current Zoning:"S- s -.
attend. P-1" Detailed Site Plan District.Pro- •• ;r^" '•i' ` ,
City of Southlake posed Zoning: "S-P-1"'Detailed Site .° SOW 13
Amy Shelley,TRMC Plan District.SPIN Neighborhood#8. °r l ,
City Secretary 'All interested persons are urged to • l +� �g17'`' �J1I
IPL0047185 attend. ' '
Oct 29 2021 City of Southlake - �}�} a - `.:
Amy Shelley,TRMC - - - . _ .,
City Secretary Extra charge for lost or duplicate affidavits.
IPL0047185
O021Oct
29 22021 Legal document please do not destroy!