Loading...
1998-02-10 Work Session CC PacketX FILE (Must Include EVERYTHING) city manager's report SPIN #8 Meeting Miron Elevated Tank February 24 - 7:00 p.m. City Council Chamber Director of Public Works, Bob Whitehead will speak to the residents of Woodland Heights and Oak Tree Estates as well as other interested -citizens regarding the Miron Elevated Water Tank. Residents interested in the esthetics of the tank are encouraged to attend. Call SPIN #8 Representative, Pattie Minder at 481-7492 for 'itional information. SPIN #12 Crosstimber Hills Sewer Project March 5 - 7:30 p.m. Lodge, Bicentennial Park Public Works staff will be present to discuss the alignment of water lines, the time table and service locations for the future sewers in Crosstimber Hills. Call SPIN #12 Representative, David Baltimore at 481-5581 ext. 892 for more information. Compost Q&A Days !e Classes on Composting 11%�turday, February 7 at noon at our own Home Depot and Saturday, February 14 at the Grapevine Heritage Center February 6, 1998 City Council Action February 3, 1998 The following items was addressed at the regular City Council meeting on February 3, 1998 Consent Agenda: (all consent items were approved) A) Res. 98-7, Calling for a General Election to be held on May 2, 1998 B) Authorization to extend the lease for Administrative Office Space. C) Authorization to advertise for bids for the construction of Miron Tower D) Street improvements for Burney Lane and Love Henry Court E) Professional Services agreement for a Geodetic Control Network FjFAu onzation for the purchase of GIs computer networking equipment G) Authorization to advertise for bids for Bicentennial Park Expansion Phase II H) Funding approval for Carroll Middle School parking lot n Professional Services Agreement for Bicentennial Park, Phase II .n Requested variance to Sign Ordinance for Diamond Circle Estates K) Appointment of Michael Sullivan as a Reserve Firefighter L) ZA 97-177, Plat Revision for 3 lots on the east side of Miron Drive (#8) Ordinances, second readings, public hearings, and related items: A) Crime Control and Prevention District FY 97-98 Annual Budget APPROVED B) Rezoning/Revised Concept Plan for Georgetown Park (#7) APPROVED C) ZA 97-151 Revised Preliminary Plat of Georgetown Park (#7) APPROVED D) Rezoning/Concept Plan for Southlake Garden Offices, located on the south side of FM 1709, approx. 1,100' west of Byron Nelson Pkwy. (#10) APPROVED E) ZA 97-176 Site Plan for additional parking on the west side of T.W. King at the intersection with S.H. 114 (#2) APPROVED Ordinances, first readings, and related items: A) Ord. 691 Approving Retail Base Rate Reductions for TU Electric Company (public hearing on February 17, 1998) APPROVED _ CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION: FEBRUARY 10, 1998 7:00 p.m. City Council Chamber The work session will include the following Discussion items: Discussion: Update on State Highway Projects Discussion: Traffic Management Study Discussion: Neighborhood Sewer Program Discussion: Cross Connection Program r City of Southlake, Texas February 6, 1998 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Work Session February 10, 1998, 7:00 p.m. 1. Agenda Item No. 3. Update on State Highway Projects. Our plans are to bring you up-to-date on State Highway 114, F.M. 1938, and our progress on the Highway 26 railroad crossings. The memo in your packet from Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead lists the issues we plan to discuss with you, ranging from land acquisition to alignment. Please let Bob know if you have specific issues you would like him to cover during his presentation on Tuesday evening. 2. Agenda Item No. 4. Traffic Management Study. As pointed out in the memo from staff, Council has been interested in studying a variety of issues related to F.M. 1709 for some time. The most recent study undertaken on this issue, conducted by HDR Engineering, examined signalization on 1709. It is included in your packet. This item has been placed on your agenda so that we can brief you and receive general guidance on the issues of signalization, medians, third lane striping, deceleration lanes and intersection improvements on F.M. 1709. 3. Agenda Item No. 5. Neighborhood Sewer Program. As you know, we are in the design and engineering phase for our Year 3 projects. As such, the timing of this work session is perfect for discussion of the future of the neighborhood sewer program. The Public Works Department has compiled a list of neighborhoods who are interested in sewer. This item will provide you with an opportunity to discuss if you would like to expand the program and if so, which neighborhoods you would like to target. Further, Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items on Interest February 6, 1998 Page 2 it will give us an opportunity to discuss policy issues related to the program. For instance, is it Council's intention to require hook-up per current ordinance requirements? 4. Cross Connection Program. During the June Retreat in 1996, you were provided information about this issue (text form only, there was no discussion at that time). You may recall that this program will be proposed to you as a result of action taken by the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC) mandating a program to detect, prevent and eliminate cross connections between water supplies and sources of contamination. As part of their program, TNRCC has promulgated rules and regulations relative to the inspection and testing for cross connections. As noted in your packet materials, staff plans to bring forward an ordinance and policy at an upcoming Council meeting to establish a program for the City of Southlake. Staff plans to brief you on the TNRCC requirements and the plans for our local program during the work session. Other Items of Interest 5. Update on the Drainage Master Plan, Phase I. As you are well aware, Council appropriated funds for the development of a Drainage Master Plan to provide us with an update of existing drainage facilities in the city, to give us a clear picture of the overall drainage system capacity, to identify existing and potential trouble areas and problems, and to serve as an aid in the planning of long-term drainage system improvements. Phase I of the Drainage Master Plan includes three main tasks: field inspections to verify the location, size, type and condition of the City's current storm 1 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items on Interest February 6, 1998 Page 3 drains, detention ponds and streams; identification of problem areas; and evaluating funding options for drainage improvements. Recently, staff received the first draft of the report prepared by the consultants (Freese and Nichols), and has just completed a review of it. A meeting has been scheduled with the consultants to go over staff comments. We plan to bring the final report to the Council at a future work session this spring. Questions or comments can be directed to City Engineer Ron Harper at ext. 779. 6. City Manager Update. You may have heard that the City Manager was diagnosed with u- K a viral infection, bronchitis and the flu! Needless to say, he has been home this week trying to recover. The latest report is that he is feeling much better and plans to be in the office on Monday. 4 of City of Southlake, Texas CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION: FEBRUARY 10, 1998 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. 3. Discussion: Update on State Highway Projects. 4. Discussion: Traffic Management Study. 5. Discussion: Neighborhood Sewer Program. 6. Discussion: Cross Connection Program. 7. Adjournment. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, and the Administrative Offices, 1725 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, February 6, 1998 at 6`��R,ip;n� , pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. ��.��O\31HL,q�,,,��/ o - r 'c Sandra L. LeGrand u City Secretary '''���i�..._ ***...��``���• If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs., please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704. and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. City of Southlake, Texas City Council Work Session Agenda February 10, 1998 page 2 EXECUTIVE SESSION PENDING LITIGATION -SECTION 551.071 The City Council may consider and/or discuss the following pending and/or contemplated litigation subjects: 1. City of Southlake vs. Kathy A. Brunson, William J. Justus, Trustee, William James Elder and James M. Elder, Inc., Employee Profit Sharing Trust. May, 1997. 2. Town of Westlake, Texas et al vs. City of Southlake, Texas. September, 1997. 3. Town of Westlake vs. City of Southlake, Carroll Huntress, et al. May, 1997. 4. Legal action against Scott Bradley, Charla Bradshaw, Abe Bush, and Fred Held. 1997. 5. Town of Westlake vs. City of Southlake, Texas; Maguire/Thomas Partners- Westlake- Southlake Partnership; Maguire Partners Westlake Partnership; and MTP-IBM Phase H and III Joint Venture. September, 1997. 6. Maurice C. Robertson, Plaintiff, vs. The City of Southlake. October, 1997. LAND ACQUISITION -SECTION 551.072 The City Council may consider the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property. After discussion of land acquisition in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open session. PERSONNEL -SECTION 551.074 The City Council may consider the appointment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline or dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City Boards and Commission members. A complete list of the City boards and commissions is on file in the City Secretary's office. DEPLOYMENT OF SECURITY PERSONNEL -SECTION 551.076 Regarding the deployment of specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. After discussion of any or all, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open session by the City Council. If personnel issues or litigation arise or a need to seek the advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting, the issues or matters will be discussed in executive session. M:\WP-FILES\AGENDAS\CC-2-10-.WPD\sI City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 6, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk. City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Update on State Highway Projects The three state highways (S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, and S.H. 26) that service Southlake are important to the growth and safety of residents and businesses in Southlake. These projects' highlights below include addressing immediate needs and long range plans. I. S.H. 114 A. Right -Of -Way Acquisition 1. Southlake is proceeding to acquire the ROW for the Dove Interchange project. This includes eighteen parcels, both ROW and drainage easement. We presently have: a) 1 parcel closed b) 2 parcels negotiated (waiting on closing) c) 6 parcels being appraised d) 9 MTP/IBM Donation Deeds 2. TxDOT is acquiring the remaining parcels approximately from the Parkway Office Center (Ebby Halliday) to the City of Grapevine. The attached ROW plan shows the acquisition status. B. Construction Plans 1. West Dove Street Interchange Because of a change in ROW alignment and construction of two travel lanes for the original plans, the construction plans for this project are being revised. TxDOT engineers anticipate the award of a construction contract will be in the Fall of 1999, thus, the revision set this project behind schedule from its original goal of spring 1999. 3-1 CURTIS E. HAWK STATE HIGHWAY PROJECTS FEBRUARY 6, 1998 PAGE 2 2. North Kimball Avenue Interchange Greg Last, Ron Harper, and I met with TxDOT's design engineer on January 23, 1998. The discussion covered the alignment, width of Kimball Ave., and future trail along Kimball Ave. Also. the structure aesthetics were discussed, i.e., stained or colored concrete. brick pavers, patterned concrete, etc. The Kimball Interchange design seems to be on schedule for award of bid in summer of 1999. 2. North Carroll Avenue Interchange TxDOT is currently acquiring the ROW. The design has yet to begin. Scheduled bid award is summer 2000. II. F.M. 1938 (Extension from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114) A. Public Works has been actively pursuing with Hillwood Development Corp. and the City of Keller planning for the extension of F.M. 1938 from Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) to S.H. 114. Southlake's Staff interest is twofold. First, the highway will be needed in the very near future to help manage the traffic volumes, which are expanding in the area. F.M. 1938 is the only north -south bound highway between S.H. 377 in Keller and S.H. 121 in Grapevine that connects to I-820. Secondly, the proposed right-of-way for F.M. 1938 between F.M. 1709 and S.H. 114 will include or overlap the necessary easement for the Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water System (NETCRWS) 36-inch loop transmission main. We are attempting to manage the planning to eliminate any duplication of costs to purchase the necessary rights -of -way for both projects. B. Two goals have been determined. First is to have the appropriate documentation to present to the Texas Highway Commission for their June meeting to enable them to start planning for the extension of F.M. 1938. Secondly, to enable the appropriate entities to reserve the necessary ROW and begin to acquire the easement for the 36-inch water line for the construction of the line in 1999. C. A meeting with Tarrant County Commissioner Glen Whitley is tentatively planned for the end of February. A public meeting will be advertised and held sometime this spring. 3-2 4 , CURTIS E. HAWK STATE HIGHWAY PROJECTS FEBRUARY 6, 1998 PAGES III. S.H. 26 (Oil Company Safety Improvements) The Cities of Southlake and Grapevine; the oil companies with facilities along S.H. 26; TxDOT; DART; and other property owners impacted have been working over a year to develop a plan to provide a safe crossing of the railroad and a safe intersection on S.H. 26 for the oil delivery trucks. Grapevine is the lead agency in this effort. A. Engineering plans for the public improvements are 90% complete. Grapevine will fund the improvements to S.H. 26 and Southlake will fund the new public street, tentatively identified as "Mustang Court". The goal is to begin construction on this project in June 1998. B. Engineering plans are just beginning for the "private" oil company accesses off "Mustang Court". The "private" oil drives will be constructed after the public improvements are completed. The oil companies are funding the "private" drives. C. Southlake Public Works Staff is working concurrently with the oil companies to parallel the proposed "private" drives with the S-7 sanitary sewer. February 4, 1998, a meeting was held with all the parties involved including the developer of the industrial tract to the east of the oil companies. Agreement was reached as to the need and desire to build the S-7 sanitary sewer. Staff is obtaining an engineering proposal and will begin the design with the intent to have the sewer built as the private roads are built, later this year. IV. Summary This is an update of the projects on state highways. Staff will answer any questions during the work session. B Wns Attachment: Map Exhibit 3-3 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 5, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director Chris Carpenter, Comprehensive Planner SUBJECT: Corridor Study - Urban Design Enhancements As you may recall, Council has approved $10,000 for professional services to explore the cost of implementing the urban design enhancements recommended in the 1995 Southlake Corridor Stud% prepared by the landscape architectural firm of Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. On July 19. 1997, staff recommended and Council approved a professional services contract with this same firm to conduct these studies. For the past seven months, various representatives from staff have met with these consultants to accomplish two important items: (1) develop a Concept Plan for a "Phase I Demonstration Project" which, when completed, would be a primary example of the design schemes the city hopes to encourage along the corridors, and (2) finalize some preliminary budget estimates for completing all the design tasks noted in the Corridor Study. You may recall that staff also received confirmation on July 19, 1997, to proceed with the use of the available TxDOT right-of-way in front of the Myers Meadow subdivision as the location for the Phase I design project at the time of approval of the professional services agreement. We are pleased to report that a final draft of the concept plan has recently been submitted to staff for review. Upon the completion of minor corrections, staff will place this on an upcoming P&Z meeting for their recommendation prior to forwarding it to Council. As for item #2, attached are the preliminary budgetary estimates prepared by NJB for the implementation of the Corridor Study design recommendations. Staff has asked the consultants to break out the costs by type of improvement, which we feel will make subsequent work easier to phase. For example, on page 4 of NJB's report, you will note that S.H. 114 overpass treatments include separate costs for improvements to the highway portion and the median portion on both sides of the highway. This arrangement is largely due to the uncertainty of timing for these types of improvements. Staff will explain the cost estimate process in greater detail during the work session if so desired. If you have any questions prior to then, please don't hesitate to call Greg Last at Ext. 744, or Chris Carpenter at Ext. 866. GL/cic L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\PROJECTS\CORRIDOR\PHASEI\WK_SES I. W PD 3-4 Seo-25-97 09:03A NJS, Inc. 972 233-2022 P.02 Southlake Corridor Study Budget Estimates of Urban Design Elements September 19, 1997 A. Portal "A" $302,796.00 B. Portal "B" o Median $54,520.00 o Greenway $17,640.00 C. Portal"C" o Median $61,500.00 o Greenway $17,640.00 D. S H 114 Overpasses (EA) o Highway $312,720.00 o Median S22,956.00 E. 1709 Intersections (EA) $117,490.00 F. Private Development Landscape Zone/Buffer Yards (Does not include screening shrubs) 1. S.H. 114 (100' R.O.W.) S15,624 (per 100 LF) 2. 1709 (100' R.O.W.) $13,104 (per 100 LF) 3. Davis (10a R.O.w.) or Continental (,00• R.O.w.) $11,064 (per 100 LF) G. Street Lighting Upgrades (EA) $1,050.00 H. Signal Light Upgrade (EA) $2,500.00 SOIXCO" AS 3-5 Sep-2S-97 09:03A NJB, Inc. 972 233-2022 P.03 COST ESTIMATE PORTAL A JOB NAME: Southlake - Pilot Proj*ct JOB NO: 0026-97 PHASE: DATE: 9119/97 BY: MS T EM UNIT I ITEM CATEGORY yp. REM I QTY. UNIT COST TOTAL SUBTOTAL 1. Evergreen 124 EA $350.00 ! - $43,400 00 2. _ Crapemyrtle (Red) 61 EA $150 00 j $9,150.00 3 Wild Flower 6 AC i $200,00 j $1,200.00 4 Tree Uplight (Cypress trees Sign'siall) 8 EA 5500.00 j 34,000.00 - 5. Lawn 276,400 SF $0.10 $27,640.00 6 :Irrigation _ - 276,400 SF $0.40 j $110,560.00 _ 7.i1.0. Graphics- 1a) Wall (8' ht. 60' long) f j _ Allow. $18.000,00 b) Cast Stone Motif Allow.; $4,000 00 c) Metal Letters AJ10W. S3,500.00 d) Lighting I AJlow.l $5,500.00 — 8. Existing Conc. Bridge Face Painting 1 9,880_ SF $0.50 $4.940_00 9. Metal Brdge Rail Painting 1,040 LF $2 00 S2.080 00 _ 10. Limestone Cobble Under Bridge - 1,980 _SF $2.00 33,960 00 11 Stone Banding Under Bridge (2' wide) j 2,400 SF I $6.00 $14,400 00 SUBTOTAL; _ $252,330.00 20% Contingency j $50,466.00 TOTAL' �— I $302,796.00 I I j i I I ESTIMATE TOTAL: $302,,00 Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc 1 3-6 Sep-25-97 09:03A NJB, Inc_ 972 233-2022 P.04 em4`0ST ESTIMATE PORTAL B JOB NAME: Southlake - Pilot Project JOB NO: 0025.97 PHASE: DATE: 9119187 BY: MS ITEM UNIT ITEM CATEGORY NO. I ITEM QTY. I UNIT COST TOTAL SUBTOTAL A. I MEDIAN: 1 ; Shade Tree @ Median 4" cal 5 EA $440.00 $2,200.00 2. i Crapemyrtle (Red) 4'-5' ht. 6 EA $150 00 $900.00 3.,Asian Jasmine 4" pots 700 EA $1.50 _ $1,050 00 4. Linope (j� Sign Wall 4" pots EA $1.50 $300 00 _-- 5. Seasonal Color @ Sign Wall _200 1320 EA $1.50 $1,980 00 6 Irrigation _ 5,000 SF $0.40� $2.000.00+ _ _- 7. Tree Uplight Q Median 11 EA $500.00 L_ $5.500.00 8 11 D. Graphics - !a) Sign Wall {35' x 5' Ht) ! 180 SF Allow.' S12,000.00 _ -I b) Cast Stone Motif (Oak Leaf 8, Acorn) ! _ Allow. S4,000.00 j ic)-Southlake" (2) Letters Allow. $3,560.00 ; 1d) Lighting Allow.' S12,000_00 I $45,430.00 _SUBTOTAL' 20'/o Contingency; ` $9.086 _._. ------ TOTAL! S54,516.00 I 1 ` B. ;GREENWAY: 1 1. Shade Tree (both sides of F.M.1709) 4- cal. 1 17 EA $440.00 $7.480.00 2. Shade Tree (both sides of F.M.170_9_) 2" cal. I 11 EA S220.00 $2,420.00 3. i Lawn :. 9,606 SF S0.10 $960.00 4.I1rrigahon i — 9.600 SF S0.40 $3.840.00 - - - - - SUBTOTAL: - - 20% Contingency' _ ----- TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL: $72 156 00 $14,700.00 $2.940.00 $17,640.00 Newman, Jackson, Bie rstein, Inc. 2 3-7 Sep-2S-97 09:04A NJB, Inc. 972 233-2022 P.05 COST ESTIMATE PORTAL C JOB NAME: Southlake - Pilot Project JOB NO: 0025-97 PHASE: DATE: 9I19l97 BY: MS ITEM UNIT ITEM CATEGORY NO. ITEM OTY. UNIT COST TOTAL SUBTOTAL A. MEDIAN: 1. Shade Trees @ Median 4" cal. 4 5 EA $440.00 11,200,001 2 @ Median 4'-5' ht._ I 12', EA $150.00 $1,800.00 3 _Crapemyrle Asian Jasmine @ Median 4"pots 6.500 EA $1.50 59,750.00 4. Irrigation 6,000 SF 50.40 $2,000.00 r 5. Tree Uplight 17 EA $500.00 S8,500.00 6 I.D. Graphics I a) Metal Letters ("Southlake") Allow., $2,500 00 i _ b) Graphics Col. (8' ht 4' dia.) 2- EA Allow, S16,000 00 ' C) Cast Concrete "Butterfly" 2 EA Allow. $6,000.00 1 d) Lighting _ _ _ ; -Allow.: 52_.50 00 0 _ SUBTOTAL $51,250.00 _---___--- 20% Contingency - S10.250.00 TOTAL; $61,500.00 B. GREENWAY: _ 1. Shade Trees (both sides of Continental St.) a- cal 2 Shade Trees (both sides of Continental St.) 2" cal 3 Lawn 4.' 1lr4ation I I S7,480.00 17 EA 1 $440.00 _ _ 111 EA i S220.00 ; _ $2,420.00 9,600, SF 1 $0.10 $960.00 9,600, SF $0.40 $3,840-00 ; SUBTOTAL: $14,700.00 20% Contingency, $2,940.00 TOTAL' 1 _ $17,640.00 I ESTIMATE TOTAL: $79,140.00 Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. 3 3-8 Sep-2S-97 09:04A NJB, Inc_ 972 233-2022 a.06 COST ESTIMATE S.N. 114/OVERPASS JOB NAME: Southlake - Pilot Project JOB NO: 0025-97 PHASE: DATE: 9119l97 BY: MS ITEM NO. ITEM QTY. I UNIT UNIT COST ITEM TOTAL CATEGORY SUBTOTAL A. HIGHWAY: 1. Evergreen. Trees 79 EA $350 00 $27,650.00 2. Lawn 156,000 SF $0.10 $16,800 00 - - 3 Irrigation 168.000 SF S0 40 $, 7,2_00.00 4. !Paver Enhancement 16.800; _ SF - $5.00 $84,000.00 Limestone Cobble a over Brdge cM Median 1,950i SF S2.00 $3_,900.00 6. Limestone Cobble Under Bridge I 19,800ii SF $2.00 [ $39,600-00 7.-Stone Band Under Bridge 2,400; SF $6,00 , $14,400.00 8 !Existing Bridge Face Painting 9.9001 SF $0_50 J- $4,950.00 9. Existing Metal Bridge Rail Painting 1,050 LF 52.00 1 $2.100.00 SUBTOTAL: I $__260,600.00 20% Contingency _ - S52,120 00 -- TOTAL - I $312,720.00 B. MEDIAN: _ 1. Shade Trees 4" cai- 10 EA S440.00 j $4,400.00 2. Ornamental Trees 6'-8' ht. 44 EA $150.00 $6.600.00 3.~Curb-Median Planter Shrubs, 2 gal. 20 EA $15.00 j _ _ 4.1Groundcover,-1 gal. ---- _ -- 255 -EA S10.00 ; _$300.00 _$2,650.00 5.!Lawn 9,800 SF - $0.10 ! $980-00 6. Irrigation 10,500 SF $0.40I $4,200.00 SUBTOTAL' S 19,130.00 20% Contingency $3,826-00 - - --TOTAL $22.956.00 ESTIMATE TOTAL: $335.676 00 Newman, Jackson, Bietxrstein, Inc. 4 _ 3-9 Sep-25-97 09:04A NJB, Inc. 972 233-2022 P-07 'COST ESTIMATE F.M. 1709 (MAJOR INTERSECTIONS) JOB NAME: Southlake - Pilot Project JOB NO: 0025-97 PHASE: DATE: 9M 9197 BY: MS ITEM NO. ITEM OTY. I UNIT UNIT COST ITEM TOTAL CATEGORY SUBTOTAL 1.,Shade Trees 4" cal. - 2.'Omamental Trees 5'-8' ht. 3. Shrubs C htedian Pint. 2-gal. 4. Groundcover (Juniper) 1-gal. wtorn.trees 5.�Tree Uplight_ (Shade Trees only) 6.;Lawn 7.1Irrigation - _ 8. Stone Paver @ Median 9. Paver Enhancement a stmet inter"dons 10.Concrete Bike Trail 18. EA 48EA 40 EA 530 EA i 16 EA ! 5,600' SF ; 8,800� SF 3,1201 SF ( I 6,400' SF ; 7,000! SF f $440.00 S150.00 $15.00_,- $10 00 $500-00 $0.10 $0.40 $2.00 $5.00 $2.75 57,200.00 _ $600.00 S5,300.00 $8.000.00 $560.00 $2.720.00 $6,240.00 'i $32,000.00 $19,250.00 11. Berm/Grading . SUBTOTAL! Allow. $9,000.00 $97,910.00 20% Contingency _ _ _ _ - ^- $19,582.00 - - TOTAL' - _ -- - - — $117.492.00 I i I ESTIMATE TOTAL: $117492 Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. 5 3-10 Seo-25-97 09:04A NJ6, Inc- 972 233-2022 P.08 `"C O ST ESTIMATE S.H. 114 (25' WIDE BUFFER) 100 LF JOB NAME: Southlake - Pilot Project JOB NO`. 002S-97 PHASE: DATE: 9119197 BY: MS ITEM UNIT ITEM CATEGORY NO. I ITEM QTY. UNIT COST TOTAL I SUBTOTAL I - Shade Shade Trees 4" cal. 21 EA S440.00 ; _ S880.00 - 2.' Shade Trees 2" cal. — -- 2'' EA S220.00 ? $440.00 _ 3. Ornamental Trees 6 $150-00 ! $900.00 4. Lawn 3,100'� _EA SF S0.10 $310.00 5-Ilrrigaeori 3,100 SF S0.40 $1,240.00 6. j SenyGrading 185 * CY 1 $50.00 - $9,250.00 - - SUBTOTAL ! G $13,020.00- 20%e Contingency . _.. S2,604.00 - TOTAL j $15,624.00 I i i E - - E i I i ESTIMATE TOTAL. $15.624.00 im Newman. Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. 6 3-11 Sep-25 97 09:04A NJB, Inc. 972 233-2022 P.09 3 -COST ESTIMATE S.H. 1709 (20- WIDE BUFFER) 100 LF JOB NAME: SouWake - Pilot Project JOB NO: 0025-97 PHASE: DATE: 9/19197 BY: MS ITEM UNIT 7 ITEM CATEGORY NO. ITEM CITY. I UNIT COST TOTAL SUBTOTAL 1. Shade Trees 4" cal. 2 EA_ $440.00 5880.00 2 _ Shade Trees 2" cal 2 EA $220.00 S440.00 3 Ornamental 6 EA $_150.00 $900.00 4. Lawn 2,400 SF $0.10 ; S240.00 - 5. Irrigator, 2.400; SF $0.40 -- $960.00 6_ Berms/Grading 150. CY $50.00 $7,500.000� SUBTOTAL' i _ i $10,920.00 _ 20% Contingency; — — _ j - i $2.184.00 TOTAL' - i ( I � _ --- .. _ $13.104.00 ESTIMATE TOTAL: $13,104.00 Newman, Jackson, Blebersteln, Inc. 7 3-12 Sep-25-97 09:05A NJB, Inc. 972 233-2022 P.10 COST ESTIMATE DAVIS (15' WIDE BUFFER) OR CONTINENTAL (15' WIDE BUFFER) 100 LF JOB NAME: Southlake - Pilot Project JOB NO: 0025-97 PHASE: DATE: 9/19197 BY: MS ITEM UNIT ITEM CATEGORY NO, ITEM CITY. I UNIT COST TOTAL SUBTOTAL 1 Shade Tree 2 EA S440.00 $880.00 — 2 Shade Tree 2 EA $220.00 $440.00 -- 3. Ornamental -- 6' EA $150.00 $900.00 , a. Lawn 2.000 SF 50.10 . $200.00 5. Irrigation — 2.000 SF S0.40 $800-00 6. Berms/Grading 120. CY $50.00 S6,000.00 _ SUBTOTAL- __- _ i S9,220.00 - 20%Contingency --_ -- $1,844.00 - — -- TOTAL $11,064.00 ESTIMATE TOTAL: $1.E 064 oa Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. 8 3-13 1. 623' h ` 1.637' +� l � 597' J68'+ + x/ �� rT h Tn � +1 /54± ]S gp± 740'+ 2 4ZPART 6 +' 453'± E N 45r± " 1 ® '• / +1 7� + +1 r `Q +1 +1 SRr� +1 + U 29 1+ 1+ 567'± 4w ti 53r± NOTE: NOT TO SCALE AND DISTANCES ARE ± FED. RD DIV. NO '------ AID PROJECT N0SHEET . N e I STATE TEXAS OiST. COUNTY F rARRANI ,D�� IITYF P. DGN CONT. SECT. JOB HIGHWAY NO. TAKING REM TAKING REM PARCEL AREA AREA PARCEL AREA AREA NO PROPERTY OWNER + VOL PAGE NO. PROPERTY OWNER + VOL PAGE DNwAY N0. I 7 N NFEDERAL ADD PROJECT N0. TEXAS 6 SH r14 SNECT II4P0. DGN CON1. SECT. JOB COUNTY 03 053 TARRANT 19 0353 i L. 0. BR/GHTBILL, Ill. ET UX 0.322 AL.'S 24.82 AL.'S C. K. ENTERPRISES, A JOINT VENTURE 1I,485 SF 23.829 S.F. D/FW-NORTHWEST HWY'. 114, ll. LTD. 1.625 AL.'S 0.052 AL.'S PARCEL 2 SOUTHLAKE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 0.104 AL.'S 0.253 AL.'S PARCEL=' D/FW NORTHWEST HWY. 114 LTD. 2.170 AL.'S 0.885 AL.'S HALE CORP. 0,679 SF 65,652 SF PARCEL 20 STEPHEN C. KIDWELL. ET UX 2.204 AL.'S 3.743 AL.'S 12599 0147 PARCEL 21 CHIN J. CHAN, ET UX 2.490 AL.'S 2.302 AL.'S SURBURBAN PROPANE. L.P. 1.074 AL.'S 0.378 AL.'S:PARCEL 22 D/� HWY. 114/ HIGHLANDS. LTD. /.239 AL.'S 2.400 AL.'S - DFW/WH/TE CHAPLE RD. LTD. 3.459 AL.'S 3.5/0 AL.'S PARCEL 23 HOLY SPIRIT ASC. F.T. U. OF W. C. 1.495 AC.' S /.50/ AL.'S TOWN &COUNTRY FOOD STORES. INC. 0.700 AL.'S 0.856 AL.'S "PAJ?CEL 24 D/FW HWY. //4/ HIGHLANDS. LTD. 0.330 AC.' 11.389 AL.'S OFW/WHITE CHAPLE TWO, LTD. 0.9/2 AL.'S 4.532 AL.'S PARCEL 25 , CARROLL-1I4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 500,512 S.F 665,786 S.F. PARCEL 25(EJ : �> CARROLL-114 UNITED PARTNERSHIP 784 S.F. PARCEL 25(E)PT. �' CARROLL-114 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP l• 322 S.F. GEORGE B. TILLERY, ET UX 0.577 AL.'S 2.514 AL.'S 12545 I860 PARCEL 26 J.G.J.. INC. CONTROL OF ACCESS ONLY 23.5/4 AL.'S PARCEL/0 EDWARD L. BLEV/NS 0.86/AC.'S 0.770 AL.'S 12611 r50 PARCEL 261EJ J.G.J.. INC. 0.144 AL.'S PARCEL ll PALMYRA INVESTMENTS, INC. 0.796 AL.'S 0 CULlFN WELDON MCDAV/D, ET UX 4.434 S.F. 10.227 S.F. . J ._ ROY STACY, TRST. 1.078 AL.'S 0.433 AL.'S . ROBERT P. STEELE. ET UX 75,625S.F. 50,397 S.F. El ROY STACY. TRST. 0.017 oc.'s _.._.. ._ Y �'_' D/FW�ARROLL ROAD, LTD. 115.585 S.F. 45,125 S.F. PARCEL /4 SOUTHLAKE LAND. LTD 113.866 S.F. 520.367 S.F. ROADWAY PROPERTIES, INC. CONTROL OF ACCESS ONLY 78.061 S.F. PARCEL I41E1 WHITE CHAPLE L.L.C. 4.634 S.F. 540,2/9 S.F. PARCEL 32 PT. l GREENWAY-CARROLL ROAD PARTNERS 0.309 AL.'S 10.081 AL.'S PARCEL 32 PT.2 GREENWAY-CARROLL ROAD PARTNERS 0.018 AL.'S PARCEL 15 WESTERRA 50UTHLAKE L.P. 3.350 AL.'S 266.54 AL.'S PARCEL 15lEJ WESTERRA SOUTHLAKE L.P. 0.560 AL.'S PARCEL 33 WESTERRA SOUTHLAKE L.P. 12.016 AL.'S I60.522 AL.'S PARCEL 34 THE FECHTEL GROUP 0.103 AL.'S 73.62 AL.'S PARCEL 34(E) THE FECHTEL GROUP 0.054AC.'S TAKINGREM TAKING ARE PARCEL AREAAREA PARCEL AREA A PROPERTY OWNER + VOL PAGE NO PROPERTY OWNER N0. + VOL PAGE NIGNNAY NO. TEXAS 6 SH 114 SNEE 114PD.DGN CONi. scci. oR COUNTY 0353 03 053 I TARRANT 20 - PARCEL 35 CAROL JEAN WILLIAMS 3.04/AC.'S 55.18 AC.'S - FOUR BEAR CREEK ASSC. 123.89/ S.F. 237,8// S.F. PARCEL 351E1 CAROL JEAN WILLIAMS 0.056 AC.'S PARCEL 54 MICHAEL WETZEL 110.800 S.F. 4/0,893 S.F. 0.802 AC.'S 20.81 AC.'S PARCEL 36 JOAN M. BERMAN, ET AL PARCEL 36(E)PT.I JOAN M. BERMAN, ET AL 0.105 AC.'S -0/Lta�aa E • Y e e { � S 70.378 S.F. 343,905 S.F. /2SSS'- - PARCEL 36(E)PT.2 JOAN M. BERMAN, ET AL 0.326 AC.'S 8,867 S.F. 34/,7/5 S.F. MOBILITY SYSTEM. INC. PARCEL 37 DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORP. O.Ot42 AC.'S 0.6/ AC.'S t CONNER LAM 2 .4Z26 S.F. 72.026 S.F. DALE EDWARD MARKS. ET UX 2,065 S.F. 63.0.55 S.F. $> /E/ ObOG� PARCEL 38 PARCEL 40A CAROL JEAN WILLIAMS JACK V. BREWER 2.066 AC.'S 2,882 S.F. 0.243 AC.'S 76,054 S.F. DALE EDWARD MARKS. SET UX 2.500 S.F. PARCEL 40B JACK V. BREWER 509 S.F. 90.129 S.F. /35,836 S.F. 0 PARCEL 41 T & M SOUTHLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ASSC..INC. 0.03`.�7AC.'S 0.20 AC.'S AUST/N OAKS HOMEOWNERS 8,907 S.F. 2.250 S.F. 502.560 S.F. PARCEL 60 AUSTOAK INC. 0.089 AC.'S 0.074 AC.'S PARCEL 42 HOME DEPOT. USA. INC. PARCEL 42(E) HOME DEPOT, USA, INC. 148,300 S.F. 4,052 S.F. 734,682 S.F. PARCEL 6/ PARCEL 6I(E) 168 VENTURE N0. III 168 VENTURE N0. !ll 0.089 AC.'S 0.064 AC.'S 0.45 AC.'S PARCEL 43 PARCEL 43 fE1 T & M SOUTHLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY T & Al SOUTHLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY MCI BUILDING SYSTEMS, L.P. 0.052 AC.'S 15.88 AC.'S 1 PARCEL 62 168 VENTURE N0. 3 2.116 AC.'S 1.93 AC.'S NCIBUILDING SYSTEMS. L.P. 0.098 AC.'S ' PARCEL 62(E) PT. l ARCEL 62(E) PT,2 168 VENTURE N0. 3 168 VENTURE N0. 3 0.2/3 AC.'S 0.216 AC.'S 282,858 S.F. 7/8.924 S.F. ' PARCEL 45 WAL-MART STORES. INC. PARCEL 63 FRED BRANAN JR.. ET AL (EST.) /.35/ AC.'S 8.95 AC.'S 0.0182 AC.'S PARCEL 63(E) FRED BRANAN JR. , ET AL (EST.) 0.057 AC.'S PARCEL 46 PART ! ANDERSON INDUSTRIES, INC. 0.220 AC.'S 4.5/2 AC.'S PARCEL 46 PART 2 ANDERSON INDUSTRIES. INC. 0.099 AC.'S PARCEL 64 (EST.. HELEN M. BRANAN, ET AL) FRED BRANAN JR. , ET AL 0.085AC.'S 0.94 AC.'S PARCEL 46(EJ ANDERSON INDUSTRIES. INC. OEM .... SOUTHLAKE SHOPPING VILLAGE 62,5Z0 S.F. 0 AMERICO FINANCIAL. LTD. 2.062 S.F. 2/. 000 S.F. W.P. BRUCE W. FUSSELMAN ET UX 604 S.F. 74,621 S.F. LB. CHAPMAN Il, TRST. 0.685 AC.'s 0 ¢D PARCEL 49 GULF 0/L CORPORATION1.47/ AC.'S 0 ` RUCE FUSSELMAN AND NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS. ET AL 75 S.F. 3,160 S.F. (AREA OF CONFLICT) PARCEL 50 LEONARD D. EMERY. ET AL AC.'S 4.456 AC.'S PARCEL 5/ JAMES B. STAHALA 0.446 AC.'S 7./6 AC.'S PARCEL 52 NORR/S L. GRAHAM, ET AL 2.396 AC.'S AC.'S STATE i 1 NO. IYA E D..N RD. FEDERAL AiD PROJECT CONVENTIONN_ SIGNS suGH, up —T LYE ocJ PPKrVR7y LOW COLKTT LIK CWTROL OF aCCM LWC SLOWT L)w rEmx - ro" LINE -0- T¢.F1+oE OR TELEOPIN." W=GE Cpt CUL%VprT CM LIOCTS STATE OF TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ==O PLANS OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PROJECT FEDERAL AID PROJECT CSJ 0353-03-052 .ACCOUNT NO. 4002 - /-3 NET LENGTH OF PROJECT=10,165.14 FT.-I.Sn Y. TARRANT COUNTY STATE HI GHWAY 1 14 SH 1 14: FROM DENTON/TARRANT COUNTY LINE TO 0.65 MILES EAST OF DOVE RD. RHDME 114 Ef DENTON 35V :377 267 ROANOKE DENTON CO. 114 TARRANT CO. HASLET.' 156 SDUTHL 81 287 FILER 1709 -- 1220 W 1938 LAME LAKEVEW 4% 377 E 34T9 'CO BLUE "OLJW SAGINAW ATALICA 14ORTH 199 R!�� ANO F— aze 1220 83 817 26 HLIRST LACE LAlKr W�ml. OWN W 199 183 496 AKS 377 820 183 WESTWDRIH *ATE TTLELICENT SVE EmSIO 820 80 NO EOLIATIONS NO EXCEPTIONS Ct STA.480-32.23 BEGIN PROJECT iti CONTROL 0353-03-052 STA. t5Bi-97.37 END PROJECT CONTROL 0353-03-052 E GRAPE VOf I f 121 N, 14 km ROY 44Cti 50 A'. I ?6 YVILLE THOSE PLAN SHEETS WHICH REFLECT THE SAME SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS SHOWN BE16W HAVE SEEN PREPARED OR MODIFIED By. SCALE: r - 3 mLES PROFESSIONAL tNCjNEER DATE Lan Lockwood. Arpdr&ws & Newnom. k'x— U-S.DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION orvrsmw ENCSgXR VOTE - mij. q 35342'LT. STA, 1497-49.51 4 poi xsi T OF EX r V ROD FOLIND ._e'w.`MEDLIN SUR..... U.P. MARTIN SURVEY ADDI TI ON Nat —1015 —19 UTP - I By -A A BLOCK B ST?!;,J.497-42A 131 LOT I -4, or ACcEss V UTioly'lES1�7 STA. I — 4S WR KAT f - - - - - - - - - - - --- ------- 210.73'LT. STA. 1492-SIL55 195.16' LT. ---A- L �T - -:L. - - - - - - - - - - ST A. 1491 +0540 Sr43'I $'I rE :ESMFT. 23T-W LT. POINT OF BEARI NG ?O'PIPELINE: AS PER PLAT 54.73' STA.1496 BEGI NNI NG 4=4 1-01 -53.77 ARC- I 89.T3' EXISTtNGGG RJLW. CHORE) BEARINGIrL"X'LT R- 1412.39' S38*10`251 195.00' LT.• 2 LC=18 ARC. _W 219 ST# a-363%tr 01531ET-45-t UC-212-95' NEW R.OJL n P9' LT. i e� . ..... 156Z2' I SE STA. 1495-42M P-0-0 STA. 1493-49.90 ...... EXISTING "AZAO' Dam @UANc I JALI 14" VIA. .4cr I vi ARC- . .... SSj ST2-0i". 47.5 13, ... LC=09.45' I TS.W LT. .... . .. 190.00' LT. f*txx-3.4'i&v; 58T.W: LrT STA. 1491-31M STA. 1492419J9 EXISTING R.O.W. 'IB'DIAUDND. SHAMROCK PETROLEUM PIPELINE104.00' LT. . •STA. . ........ ....... .. . .......... ...... .. ........ ........ ................. . . . ........... ... 1490-63.15 . . .. ........... ......... . .. ------- 41 z m -------- .............. ................................ . ..... -- ------ 1�461DO Sm 114 WW'CEXT��Ok.,"� ......... T . . . .... ....... ....... ....... ­.S 22400- . . . .. ... ..... ---- - --- -------------­- . ................. . ................... ......... .... . ....... . . ... . ..... .......... . .. .............. ....... ------- ........ ...... =77-7:7­77"' ................ ........... ....... . ....... Q OF AL LINE LEI MAGURE/THOOPARTNEAS — NUTLAKE/SMHLAKE PARTNERSHIP DEED r -lqoo Pc.0 7 STA.1484+91 I dPS2 TO STA. 14ft*TSM AC. APPROX. REMAINDER = ZAS WEIAGLJIRE/THOASARTNERS — TLAKE/SOUTHLAKE PARTNERSHIP DEED %10�74m 39-0 STA. 1491 0 STA. . 14&%44L90 0.055 AC APPROX. REUAJ NDER x 20.15 AC. SS . . ........ EXISTING R.O.W. WESTLAKE/SOLITHLAKE PARK ADDI TI ON N06 I C.M. THROOP SURVEY A- 1510 A. I ___j . .......... NOTE: NO RIGHT 'OF WAY WILL BE REOUIREO FROM STA. 148043223 TO STA. 1509-00.00 G — GAS W — WATER SS— S ORW SEWER STEWATER =MU.D . ..... TELEPHONEWW UT —_ f .... . . 2M45'RT. _OT— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE —UE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC _OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC _5C— BURIED CABLE TELEVISION r. STA. 1498+52.12 —DC OVERHEAD CABLE TELEVISION _PL PIPE LINE r97.89'RT. STA. 1491-69.95 FIRE HYDRANT FM 0 11ANHOLE Q" Tc VALVE % Af 353A 1, SIA.8497 THOSE PLAN SHEETS WHICH REFLECT THE SAME SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS SHOWN BELOW HAVE ------ .............. BEEN PREPARED OR ROOFED SYs 1, ��ATE 3 PROFS&SIONIALLINGINEER Lon, LoCkwoocL Andrus & Newnon6 by- 80MIllEANNICS SHIM 9M OCTERMINM STATE FEIIEX4L IMI)MAIM M USING SIN tic rnmxcl COON r MATES ozAam TO SLWACL . I - ThmaxT am I cc j dw'I in 194 & , ZoDc04.l5uSHItarvTj=b ------------- U.P. MARTIN SURVEY A-1015 STA.15U9+36.86 TU 51A.I5ZZ+6Z.IZ OATS AC. 55399 AC. REMAINDER UP. MARTIN SURVEY A-1015, APPROX.0.178 AC. T.R. MANN SURVEY A-1107. APPROX. 0220 AC. JJLMARTIN SURVEY A-1 134. APPROX. OMO AC. MTP - 11311 PHASE 11 l 111 dV VOL. D STA.1508+9T.O9 TO STA.151TNI.R9 PART 1 s 0229 AC. STA. 151 T+4I.B9 TO STA. 1547+53.96 PART 2 ■ 52T9 AC. 310.786 AC. REMAINDER U.P. MARTIN SURVEY A-1015. APPROX.0229 AC. TO USA 1 L VOL. MT 1 T PG. 644 DETAIL /LTS. NOTE, BEARINGS SHOWN WERE DETEI OU USING SH ITO PROJECT COORDINATES ADJUSTED TO SURFACE. 50 0 50 IOO .. SCALE IN FEET NOTE: NO RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE REOUIRED FROM STA. I480+3223 TO STA.1509*00.00 LEGEND G GAS - r (WATER SS' STORM SEWER RW WASTEWATER UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OT OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC BC BURIED CABLE TELEVISION ' OC OVERHEAD CABLE TELEVISION -: PL PIPE LINE . ♦ FIRE HYDRANT FIC O - MANHOLE ONo air VALVE lE;2t w t71.r l�,i' THOSE PLAN SHEETS WHICH REFLECT THE SAME 5 SEAL AND SCNATIRE AS SHOWN _BELOW HAVE BEEN PREPARED OR MODIFIED BY: • i R TE ■ LodcsoolS Andras i NanOR Ins r.rw roaI STATE I iDOWL Yo Noum m ow TOIAS 5 ti mx COYRT m = a. .Jr. 2 TAPPAWR lawl 03 low 104#4 2O04304.1 SASH I 1 AR IOLM BEN D. PARKS � T.C. MASSEY 3 VOL. PG. ►o ��� MTP -IBM P \ STA. ISIT*41.89 DEED L11 B 111 JV OA22 AC. ~ PART 2 // VOL- PG. NO REMAINDER / / STA. 1508*9749 TO ST& 1517+41M T.9.MANN SURVEY A-1107 3 3 ��\ ►oti PART 1 • 0229 AC. STA.ISITN1.89 TO STA.1547+53.96 PART 2 ■ 5279 AC. PROP.. SIN 14 310.T86 AC. REHJ.B. MARTIN SURVEY AI NDER /� r R.O.W. U.P. MARTI N SURVEY A-1015. APPROX. 0229 AC. A- I 134 3 4 EXXIISNT.SH 11./ �CI, JB.MARTIN SURVEY A-1134. APPROX.5279 AC. U.P. MARTIN SURVEY PART' / A� I O i 5 DETAIL POINT Of TRACT DINE so o so IDo N.T.S. BIEGI11i NG / SCALE IN FEET TRACT ONE 'A' IY4I7•LT. STA. 1517.AId9 , I.OAO'LT. PART I STA. 1518-00.19 140.00• LT. I20.00' LT. - STA. 1520.00.00 12S.00' LT. ► STA.1516.00a0 4 SA2-IA'N� S70.1522.00.00 - 3 5859 53672 I s E 199 N 1' S32-14.54T 200,%• t NEW Rdi 5.r1. SA4 I' SOO•13'061 - s36oz 1s� soo 00 50.97' POINT OF BE:�Z GINNING F. EXISTING C.OF A.UNE k._..........._ �.... _....... ... - ..- _.._.. ...... _... �g 1,3.w 4-f N36S2'IS'W 22T.75' 63.63' N36WI57 1384.00' 6,01• ;. ,/t, N3632'151F - p O --- -------- ,... .... ... _................. _ ------------ 103 99' LT. r 103.99' LT. + �, STA. 15U.91. 7" -...-•--•^-- STA:15tt.E2.95..----- ..---- -�_ In N In 103.99' LT. In Q .. ... . ............--.. .- ...__.... ..._...-'---. _.. - .. .-..._._ _....... ...... - .. ---•------ ..-- . .--..._.---...... _....... _ .. ._--•------ --------_......- ........... ._ .-. .... . sil_11� NE• CENTERLINE FJIS ...._ _................"... ._...-....._.__.__.__..._ ... ____.._.. 1••- S XWIS•E 1520 00 625 N tN W LLJ Z Z J U 116S1I' RT. _".. ..........-.. .. ............- - ...+.'' ..-.. STA.1519-N137-»_ -.... _... _......-_.... _.......... .......... ....... .__-_QQ.�,:... �..._..__..._.---------..... ---..._._..... _.....-"._ -_... ..... ..-. _. _. _ ...-... ._... - ..... .. .._ - �- %" • .. ..._. ....�-..__...............' ..�..�.__. s 5T fiw 536'32'IS•E 366.9L'• (STINGR.0.NI. 5367?'ISf B88A1• NSY27 EX = N88-ZT407 .. • 26.6s• C_ OF A LI NE NE ■ R.0.11. N 36*32' I S' ■ 1325' r 137.00' RT. KM 32' 157 502.68' cF• 5 STA.1522.62.12 6 POINT OF LEGEND { BEG( NNI NG LOT I BLK 2 LOT I BL1C 2 fP/ ■ WATER RESTLAKEISOUTHLAKE PART( $5 STORY SEINER ADDI TI ON KID.1 i ■TI NIASTEI/ATER LIT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE U.P. MARTIN T.W. MANN SURVEY �r OT OUNVDERGAD TELEPHONE SURVEY A-1015 A'-1 107 �`a-.Ilk- °END AD ELECTRIC , 0 BC ON BURIED CABLE TELEVISION EXIST. FHA 14 ►6• OC OVERHEAD CABLE TELEVISION R.O.R. - ... 6 ••-� - _ PL PIPE LINE ....- , `• 1 .. _ �i ♦ FIRE HYDRANT FHI 0 MANHOLE G" - f[ VALVE PROP. sH 414 c .� ' .' .e � EXIST. SN 114 htF � ,F•�� ✓ R.O.Q. • � � pyz 6 , DETAIL PROP. SN 1 1 A e . ' -�' ' + - r i DETAIL . ►LTS. e8 •'—�r THOSE PLAN SLEETS WHICH REFLECT THE SAME 5 SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS SHOWN BELOW HAVE . .11AGUIRE/THOMAS PARTNERS-WESTLAKEISOUTHLAKE PARTWMMP i' BEE PREPARED -OR YOOFiE�D eTl VOL. D DIf O Nj(I- IJLFNO. ty STA.1509+3686 TO SST.A.1522+6L12 ; IBM POINT OFI� PROFES ENGINEER DATE CL4T8 AC% 5SJ99 AC. REMAINDER VOL. STA. 1522+62.12 TO STA. 1545+64.15 LanU.P. MARTIN SURVEY A-1015. APPROX.0.178 AC. 4A52 AC. .• T.N. MANN SIitYET A -I 107. APPROX. 0220 AC. 3326T AC. REMAINDER JB.MARTIN SURVEY A-1134.APPROX. 0.080 AC. J8•MARTIN SURVEY A-1134 tri •..... .tie STATE FEGEw AID N+lO= IC6, 6 SI NOTE.REAR(NS SHOW VIM OETflr/NED o..r A TtIAi tNc sN Ito PRO.IECT CDONDINATES tu�c couwrT e•n. t a •r.� IA)A STEO TO SURFACE a a a - a • • p•�,.. A TAA111YTf O]Sl fq OSt. >r IN 2GOCAK1547SHI Mlil%= 6" - IBM PE 11 & fit iv DRAIVOLNAGE ASEIENT STA. IS21+4&T8 TO STA. IS31#31.90 OAS I AC. JJL MARTI N SURVEY A- 1134 EXISTING t(YP"VATE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT f EMPOV.SNPI 114 /Z If /114 SM — -6 / IBM DRAINAGE EASEMENT VOL. PG. STA. 152?+TSM TO STA. I 1+3T.?4 0.404 AC. VTP - I 8M PHASE II & III JV DEED VOL. PG. STA. ISOS+97.09 TO STA. IS17*4IJ9 PART I a 0229 AC. STA. 1517+41.119 TO STA. 1547+5&% PART 2 - 5.279 AC. 310.T86 AC.REMA NDER U.P. MARTIN SURVEY A- 10 15. APPROX. 0.229 AC. JJL MARTIN SURVEY A-1134.APPRDY-5.2T9 AC. STA. I5Z2+Q_.12 TO STA.. 1545+94.15 4A52 AC 33.267 AC. REMAI WDER .LB. MARTIN SURVEY A-1134 - C3 O .. . ...... ... AA La Z LEGEND C GAS W - WATER -55- STORM SEWER WW- WASTEWATER UT - Lmow camm 76xm OT - OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UE- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DOE - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC -. • SC - BURIED CABLE TELEV1901 -IDC- OVERHEAD CABLEJELEVISION Pl. PIPE LOW ........... FIRE HYDRANT Fif MANHOLE Im VALVE & Aim A., THOSE PLAN SHEETS WHICH REFLECT THE SJUAE SELL AND SIGNATURE AS SHOWN BELOW HAVE ---BEEN PREPARED OR MODIFIED By. PROF ftSQ4 ENGINEER DA:FF Ilk ow NOT&BEARINCS SHOWN EREDETEMIIIIED *--W- sun 0`001ift AID 01111LEM 46 USING SH ITO PROJECT COORDINATES r..r c TrxjS ADJLIS7ED TO SURFACE.CmKryas a IA^%Wt 10M 03 OW SO IN ZGChl0 104,116413SHI 14RI SO= O UTP - low PKASE 11 & III JV DEED VOL. m STA_ 150E-97.09 TO STA. 1517-41.89 PART I - O_?n AC. STA_ 1517-41.89 TO STA_ I 547-5.1.9G PART 2 - 5-279 1C. 310-TOG AC.RELLAINDER LLp.LIARTIN SLfrrET A-IOIS. APPROX. 0-229 AC. ilLWTIN SLATIrEY A-i 13-4- APPROX. 5,279 AC. DEED VOL- PC, --2162.12 TO STA. 1545-84.15 6 sm 414 4.4SZ AC. ,ZAC_ RE" "DER DETAIL llk SLIRVET A-[ 134 aLT-IL PART I DETAIL $0.5- MaNCES ANW SW TH VEX- STA_ 1547*10.Ti TOPSTA. 1547-46-n 0.1 IT AC_ 6.&1I AC. RE Lw wDER PROP. Sm 1 9 4 IL.". J.B. MARTIN SURVEY A- 1 134 8B 2 Ill-W, 1. 1. 98 Sf&.IS49-8422 - 105.00'Ll-DOYC RD. SIA_ %-(SM DETAIL K. T S. KIT RZ-11. 7S354* L 1. 761.1 3* 1. T. STA. 1%5,O.m4f so 0 so 2 1 4_W' L T. too St A. SCALE IN FEET SIT-zs-"j S4,0L 00 STA. StAL 15441-csil Q VOL. STA. 15,48-6"1 TO STA. 1556.8S.D.4 PART 2 STINC I S113 AC. NO IRE" HXR I VU4* LT. -ml I Nf?75'3" 1 970.02, - I I. losas ... ... 5,.0 3 VOL. STA_ 15,47-22.98 TO STA. 1558-24AS 1.733 AC. NO REUAINDER 645;00 650 5FE FREE T 9 FOR PROPERTY Darn LEGEND c - CAS 9 - WATER _SS - STORK SEWER -.W- WASTEWATER _Ul - LOOCRCROUND TELDvO 01 - OVEA04CAD rELEPHO-C LIE - L"XRCROUND ELECTRIC OE - OYEFUIE&D ELECTRIC _BC- IN-011FE) CABLE TELEVISION OC - OyEItHEAD CABLE TELEVISION F4 - PIPE LINE + FIRE KYORAXT VIC 0 WAM40LE a" K VA.Ll/E OLD ORCKARD COUNTY ESTATES THDSE PLAN S+CETS W14CH REFLECT TIE SAIL SEAL 00 SCKATLft[ AS SOWN BELOW NAVE BEEN MPAREO OR WOOCI[D BY. T.BEEDY SUR-VEY A-72 rwarELSOMIL thcocrA DATE j YSA r GMWL I. DOVE M STA. 105-6= , STATE .0 --mico .0. 11 CI 00TEAREAsUmM $mDww wEK omitwmm t[tai USAIC Sal ITO PROJECT COORDINATES 41A&LT.DOVE M ADASTED TO SLAVAM yj T A- " -105_4.0 Immil a3 PROP. SN 114 � IZ 1� 1 I� NO(f p FOR OA; 11 ON PARCEL I SEE (n SHEET B +1 L TP - IOU PHASE 11 L III JV OEED VOL. m STA.150E•9TA9 TO STA. ISIT•4I.89 PART I • 0.229 AC - SEA. 1517+41.89 TO STA. 1547-SL96 PART 2 • 5279 AC. 310.TSG AC. REMAINDER UP.LIARTIN SLRYEY A-IOIS.APPROX.0229 AC. J.B. MARTIN SLIRVEY A-1 1 }l. APPROX. 5279 AC. CONTINUED COVERAGE ON SHEET 9 719 `il" l 1. S1A- I",)-a412 IDLm L1. DO vc RD. Sit K•GS1)0 OETAIL HLT i J.B. MARTI N SURVEY A-1134 J. WEST SURVEY A-1620 NOTE: SEE SHEET 9 FOR PROPERTY DATA PART 1 p5a.Sm 114 R.O.W. 3 PART 2 3 �1 1 E[1 S1•SN IIt �J 1 -a, DETAIL OLT-L HT OF 00•06 xi" ►/c � n�/• L 1. S 1 A. 9 I •OO.DO \ sDo-ss•zG� wr GOlW L1. f N SO 0 SO IN SCALE IM TEET - • .9 s,Rvc, LIK G CAS W WATER SS STORL SEWER rW WASTEWATER 1JT VOEROIOL00 TELEP+O•E OT OVEIbEAD TCLEF OK LE LO"Rf1i0U0 ELECTRIC OE OVEM41AD ELECTRIC BC W-MED CABLE TELEVISION OC OY£R)EAO CABLE TELEVISION - P'L PIrE L11E FIRE /(TEIRANT Clio o MAI+OLE a" K VALVE T/OSE PLAN SLEETS WHCH REFLECT TIE SANE SEAL AND Sa/XATLK AS S+/OrN BELOW NAVE BEEN PREPARED OR L,OOfED BT, 'rROFeSSCAJ;LENCWEER DATE Ickil L- a ckwooAndr- k 1ownark, V\G ..,,.. '�� Hart rcnoul .Io P1,6LLT .0 p IWOTGBEMo1GS SHOWN WERE OETEftatHEED ICAA La1Wt SimIro PRO [Ci COORd "ATE$ _ nii �• ADAISTED TO SURFACE _ _ �..�.1 j TlwWafl �1 W lRi 7�1 Ilt ZCIO[JO#. I SC]SN 1 1 HR 1 MIX J. WEST SURVEY ABS T. 1620 S18'56'24'E 550. 00' 0 WESTERRA TIMARRON L. P. DEED VOL. PG. STA. 1548-77.86 TO STA. 1562-35.22 2.502 AC.'S 53.73 AC.'S REM. S05624"I E 81 PROPOSED ROW LINE ---,A s 1pn-rxy 191 WESTERRA TIMARRON L.P. TEMPORARY EASEMENT VOL. PG. STA. 1557.0014 TO STA. 1558-20.14 0.206 AC.'S m WESTERRA TIMARRON L.P. DEED VOL. PG. STA. 1547-14.35 TO STA. 1560-71.33 3.035 AC.'S 6.22 ACS EM. 54Cr S18*56'24'E S19*25139'E-- 540. 00' M18*56'24V N18*56'24W 77.35' ........... ........................ ................. .................... I . ........ ........ ..... ............ ......... .......... ............ ........................................................I ............. ........ I ......... ....... . ................................... .......... ........... I ........ ......... 4�-o, "a ................. I ...... ......... ...... ... I 1 11 111 11, 111 1 EXISTING ROW UNE- -970.'02' N19-25'39W 308. CV .k e P ALNO SHIVERS. ET AL VOL. DEED PG. STA. 1562-35.18 TO STA. 1578-38.02 3.310 AC.'S 39.41 AC.'S REM. CURVE DATA PI - 1577-46.08 A - 46*07'28' R • 2.864.79' T • /I 279.2r L • 2.406.22' ��l / '18 -56'24'E 18.15' S��06' -18'48'30' 2 1 i i 872.71' 192, R-2,658-52' ..... ...... ... ....... ............... .......... Or ...... ..... .......... N19'26'26'W ........ 50. 218' U) 1.155-93' 41 L-301204' + I R-2.181,,93' ............ ............... ..... I ....... .. .... ............... ............... ........... I ............... ............... ................... ...... .............. I .... VI ............. "V"", ............... ........ ....... .... I ....... ............... IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-m ............ ..................................... ...... ........... ................. I'. ..... .... 11 ............ .. .............. ............ .. ............ .......................... I ..... .......... .......... Lu ............... ............ .............. kIIIIII ............... ......... ........ ............ I ................. - ........ I .......................... ... ............ . ................ ............... ............... ........ ..................................I 111111VI"', ................. -11-IIIIIII-IIIIII ........ 1 -1, 1, ................ ...... I I I ................ I IR I I I I I I - ----------- - ............ ............... EXISTING RON LINE n 293.66' 425. 34' .T ' S1925'3-r" ....................5...1.9. I 7ZIZE ......... .I. ............... 'I ... ... .... 1.8R2.403" 4PL 4057 O .................... "I'll-rir ..... ..... I ........................ . ..... ......... ........ I I ......... 15.99' wt- ............ .Ir@ ......... "M, Iy....I..... . -2...... il I ... ..... 115546v ACCESS ............. CONTROL OF .......................... 1 ..................... . .. .......... ... .......... .... ................... ................... T.. .............. ....... . ...... ........ ......................... ............. ... ........... I I ................... .................................. . ............. . '...'... ...... ROPOSED ROW .'EI I a 10/1-4` 9.51 5(y A' N2620 v N230240W V//44'04W 70 67' 81.3235 596.04' 1-0�;�NO3Z58-W w IBM DEED VOL. PG. STA. 1548-65.31 TO STA. 1558-85.04 1.583 AC.'S NO REM. m IBM DEED VOL. PG. STA. 1547-22.98 TO STA. 1558-24.45 1.733 AC.'S NO REM. SH 114 4ph� P 41 ALNO SHIVERS. ET AL DEED VOL. PG. STA. 1550-71.40 TO STA. 1574-46.52 3.553 AC.'S 22.560 AC.'S REM. J. WEST ABST. SURVEY 1620 o20-61' N2Z35'39'N 164.36' 03556'?-6'W Scole I-- Feet 0 50 100 ISO D ' RD "N E E ED. Y: RID S-EE D I M Al DPROJECT NO. NQ, - NO 6 1 9 STATE DIST. COUNTY Ty TEXAS TARRANT CONT. SECT. JOB HIGHWAY NO. 2 S.. 0 ON i =052 SH11408. DGN 353 03 SH 1 14 T 0 JACK RICHARD JONES DEED VOL. PG. STA.1578.38.02 TO STA.1581.03.02 20.294 S. F. 16.228 S. F. REM. /3 W.H. CRUMBAKER, ET UX NOVELLE R. DEED VOL. PG. STA.1574.50.96 TO S TA.I576.78.25 24,887 S. F. 0.0 S. F. REM B72. / 3a R"2.658. Sr PROPOSED LINE• fL CURVE DATA PI. 1577.46.08 A-48'07'28 R - 2.864.79' T • 1,279.21' W L - 2, 406.22' o z l2 SOUTHLAKE-FOXHOLLOW. LTD. DEED VOL. PG. STA.1574.50 TO STA.1576.80 2.832 S. F. 623,066 S. F. REM. /4 T.W. GLOSSER. ET UX DEBRA DEED VOL. PG. STA.1576.16.69 TO STA.1582.33.75 1.590 AC.'S 3.004 AC.'S REM. JAMES J.WEST SURVEY ABST. 1620 p.047'06• 42l_70' __-- I... Iz w N I� RKWAY �A N`�Q r ICE P �ENTE 8I �\ s � LOT 2 O 240.10' 11581.03.02 m � Ilvy;;ll••— ,r, lb END Z . 4002-1- �4m STA. l58 + . 00 .. .......................... 1 ;;;;;I,r.,.lr.r.l.... .11. 1.1 LINE R 2•�D ' .. EX�„rI..IIIIIII.r.l.r...STING F8' •30 2% l4 55 9 3' m I "13 t1 rIX %'wll ;'� ;tile nn.rnnrn.rr,,,,,,,rrnrrnlrrnrlrrin,nnnnnn,rinnnlrn rn.rrnnl,.,, r, vrn.n.l n.nnn... nnrr....................... ... Inn,,, I'nnl nnum""I""""""'„rrrrr, „,Irrrrr •rn'rnnn.,,,,,,nn.,,, Innnun.n.n nn, r nnn.un. n. 'In""n;n. u;In..rnnr.rr •:'n:rrrnn•rnr.nrrn un,ur.rm l""II n.r,runrrlrr rrnnnrrrrrr r..r r.r,. � . I; . rF'll YI ;I �rI ;r , ..III.... IIr ...........:...................III.r.................rrrrrr.rr.rrr.r. ....... .I,Illlrlrrrlr, rrrr. rlrrrr.,r...r..rr.l.....11l.. �. " ................ n,11r.,............1......1 nlrr r.r rrr "rnrrrrlr, I. ..ri I. .rrrrrrrrrr................ .rrrl,rnrrrr.rr rrrrr.rnrr.rr.rrr.lrr lll...l.lnlllllllll.I l... 1.033.2r yr,1, C TROL OF Z•24'38'5/' E S S R- 2 . 40/ / .83' 8 4 .3 6' W I N33'S `N° B' 26 0 •W C7 -...Irrrrr...................... : 0 24' r,' I r.rr ,Il,lll..r.r rI.I..•,'.Ir.,rl.1.l;;;;"�;;;;;;;;;;;; J' r� "l.rr Ar r s I" O i 9 O r'I� mr I r c' i `1^ / z rrrrl...l 111 l'i 111 ll.l _.....rG� LL \ A �l3 , 3 2 ITR R L 0 I IIRf6�i� �rH �Ir.'rn In 'I 'I r>•./�,1" '� PLPL 27.20' 229. 49 �-04/6'S8- 12 � s z R-3.069.08' �rn 204.93' 11574.46.52 LOT 9 FAX N0LBLK•I OsO d M 1• O. 03' h �0 LINE b � R� ti v 0 P 0 5 E D R I.R�9.09" P .r n.r.nlr „rlln c14.06 - 11582.33.75 T HOMAS W . HOOD SURVEY ABST . 706 OX, DOVEND.DGN e1 Scale `n Feet 0 50 100 150 I V. NO AID PROJECT NO. - -- 6 10 sra�111 couNrrTExTARRANT CONt. SECT. JOB N...IIAI N0. City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 6, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Management Study - F.M. 1709 Over the past several months, staff has had the city's traffic consultants conduct studies on the future management opportunities for F.M. 1709. We have apprised City Council of the results of these studies during the June retreat, budget briefings and normal Council Meeting updates. This is an opportunity to combine and summarize the findings to date, to layout the next steps, and to obtain proper direction and consensus from the City Council. The studies and issues that need to be discussed include: 1. TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION STUDY 2. MEDIAN STUDY 3. THIRD -LANE STRIPING 4. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 5. DECELERATION LANES 6. VILLAGE EAST CIRCULATION STUDY 1. TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION STUDY HDR Engineering was retained to perform a F.M. 1709 Traffic Signal Study. Their report was delivered to the city on August 8, 1997. This report confirmed staff s opinion that the signals along F.M. 1709 should and could be coordinated by means of a centralized computer system. (A copy of the study is attached for your use.) Staff is currently preparing a Request for Proposal for the design of this coordinated system. Funding for this project was placed in the 1998-1999 budget cycle. Two traffic signal projects have been designed and submitted to TxDOT for approval: F.M. 1709 at Shady Oaks and F.M. 1709 and Commerce St. Funding for these two projects was included in the 1997-1998 budget. 4-1 CURTIS E. HAWK TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STUDY - F.M. 1709 FEBRUARY 6, 1998 PAGE 2 2. MEDIAN STUDY HDR Engineering was asked to look at two specific areas on F.M. 1709 to determine methods of controlling access to drives and roadway in high traffic areas: Woodland Heights and Peytonville Ave. The city used the HDR recommendations for the channelization done in the Woodland Heights/Miron area. The recommendations for the traffic management at Peytonville Ave. has resulted in a portion of the work to be done with the development on the northeast corner. Funds for the engineering of the ultimate redesign of this area were allocated in the 1997-1998 budget, construction funds are planned for 1998-1999. We have received a proposal from Lee Engineering to provide information on access management and median design. The purpose of this study will be to identify advantages and disadvantages of medians and to develop criteria for the location of median breaks. There is very little technical guidance relative to the use of medians except in areas subject to high volumes of accidents and to prevent cross traffic across multiple lanes of traffic. The decision to install medians is often more of a policy decision than an engineering decision. 3. THIRD -LANE STRIPING Most of the traffic studies that have been received over the past year show that the addition of a third -lane on F.M. 1709 is warranted. Typical engineering guidelines allocate 7,000 vehicles per day per lane for this type of roadway (both directions) which is equilvant to 28,000 vpd. Recent studies have shown counts in excess of 30,000 vehicles per day and approaching 35,000 vehicles per day. Lee Engineering has estimated that to convert the current left -lane to a through travel lane would cost approximately $13,000 per mile. F.M. 1709 is approximately seven miles long for a cost of $91,000. At this time it is unlikley that TxDOT will contribute funds. 4. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Two intersections have been identified for major improvements: Peytonville Ave. and White Chapel Blvd. Peytonville Ave. was discussed in conjunction with the median study. Funding for White Chapel Blvd. has been allocated in the 1997-1998 budget and proposed for 1998-1999; however, no engineering contract has been awarded. 5. DECELERATION LANES With the eventual expansion of F.M. 1709 to three travel lanes in each direction, the city needs to address requiring developers to dedicate the necessary right-of-way and 4-2 CURTIS E. HAWK TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STUDY - F.M. 1709 FEBRUARY 6, 1998 PAGE 3 to construct deceleration lanes into their project. The need for these is obvious; however, the spacing and frequency fof the lanes is less clear. Staff feels that deceleration lanes need to be required at almost all new public roads. Staff is also working with out traffic consultants to establish criteria in detemining the best locations other than public roads. Council will be consulted once the draft criteria have been developed. 6. VILLAGE EAST CIRCULATION STUDY Community Development has been spearheading this study. A memorandum from Director Last is attached. SUMMARY Staff will expand on all the above items during the work session and will be seeking further direction from Council. Attachments A 4-3 X X August 7, 1997 I -al Mr. Robert R. Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: FM 1709 Traffic Signals, Geometrics and Medians Study Dear Mr. Whitehead: In accordance with our agreement for engineering services for the above -referenced study, we are pleased to submit the attached Technical Memorandum, which documents the results of the signal system evaluation. Based on the evaluation, it is recommended that the traffic signals along FM 1709 be coordinated and that FM 1709 should be restriped to provide three through lanes in each direction. Optimum locations for future traffic signals along FM 1709 are also identified in the Technical Memorandum. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to the City of Southlake. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns regarding this transmittal, please contact me. Sincerely, latyt?'y *­-a— Larry V. Hoffman, P.E. Senior Project Manager Enclosure HDR Engineeriag, Inc. Employee -owned Suite 125 12700 Hillcrest Road Dallas, Texas 75230-2096 REcErVED ,,+'a ti 8 1997 DEPT. OF PUBIC WORKS Telephone 972 960-4000 Fax 972 960-4471 4-4 QW Technical Memorandum TO: Larry V. Hoffman, P.E. HDR FROM: Joseph T. Short, P.E. Kelly Parma Lee Engineering, Inc. DATE: August 6, 1997 SUBJECT: FM 1709 Signal System Evaluation Introduction This memorandum presents the results of the evaluation of the signal system on FM 1709, a five -lane East-West major arterial in Southlake, Texas. The section of FM 1709 evaluated consisted of eight signalized intersections, bounded by the intersection of FM 1709 with Pearson Lane on the West and Kimball Avenue on the East. Existing intersection lane configurations and distances between signals for FM 1709, which had a posted speed of 45 mph, can be seen in Figure 1. At the signalized intersections on FM 1709, opposing left turns from FM 1709 are leading and are allowed during the protected phase only. All of the signals for the North -South cross streets operate with split phasing except Kimball Avenue. The signal at Kimball Avenue allows the North - South movements to operate simultaneously, providing only a permitted phase for left -turns. Objectives In evaluating the signal system on FM 1709, there were three objectives. The first objective was to determine if signal coordination was needed along FM 1709. If signal coordination was necessary, an optimized progression plan was to be developed for those intersections on FM 1709 during peak periods of the day (AM, noon, PM). The second objective was to identify locations for future signalized intersections on FM 1709 with minimal impact on the signalized progression plan. The final objective of this study was to investigate the necessity of a third through lane on FM 1709. Analysis The existing signal system on FM 1709 was evaluated by obtaining two types of data, 24- hour volume counts and turning movement counts. Twenty-four hour volumes were obtained at the following five locations on FM 1709: • Between Pearson Lane and Davis Boulevard, • Between Davis Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue, • Between Southridge Lakes Parkway and White Chapel Boulevard, 4-5 pole: 7-14-97 file No: LEE7104 r- lr�� Scale: N/A Project ID: — Checked By: Jody Short Approved By: Jody Short Drawn by: Tom Fletcher SOIITHRIDGE LAKES PEYTONVILLE PARKWAY DAVIS AVE. BLVD. PEARLON _ �- _ _jII- LAi i FIB 1709 j�. WHITE CHAPEL BLVD. CARROLL AVE. VILLAGE CENTER KIMBALL AVE. _j!.-��_ _r Fk 1709 5100, I 3400' I 1700' I 6300' I 5200' I 3500' I1700' 5323 SPRING VALLEY ROAD Figure 1. EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS SUITE 230 OALUS, TEXAS 75240 AND SIGNAL SPACINGS ON FM 1709 972.701-9663 FAX972.701-9669 Southlake, Texas 7,0—iminicninics PHOENIX DALLAS 24 • Between White Chapel Boulevard and Carroll Avenue, and • Between Kimball Avenue and State Highway 114. These 24-hour volume counts were used in performing a coupling analysis of FM 1709. This type of analysis is used in determining the need for traffic signal coordination. The equation used to compute the coupling index is shown below: I = V / L where: I = Coupling index, V = Two-way peak hour volume on link (veh/hr), and L = Length of roadway section (ft). According to the ITE Traffic Engineering Handbook, intersections with a coupling index of 0.5 or greater during peak traffic periods should be coordinated. A coupling index between 0.3 and 0.5 indicates that signal coordination should be considered. Turning movement counts were collected at the eight signalized intersections on FM 1709 during weekday AM, noon, and PM peak hour traffic periods. These turning movement counts and other characteristics of the eight intersections were used as input for the computer software programs in optimizing the signalized intersections. Signal phasing options were limited to the existing phasing conditions. Additional efficiency could be gained by implementing alternate phasing patterns at some intersections. Two transportation software packages, Synchro 3 and PASSER II, were used in evaluating the signal system on FM 1709. Both packages are microcomputer software packages used to model and optimize traffic signal timings. Synchro 3 was used to manage the data of this study, while PASSER II was used in selecting the optimal cycle length for each peak period. In PASSER II, the cycle length that produces the maximum bandwidth efficiency is selected as the optimal cycle length. The efficiency of the cycle is the average fraction of the cycle used for progression. The cycle length selected should also minimize the arterial system delay. One-way progression allows one direction of traffic to travel through the maximum number of intersections without having to stop. It is used for either one-way streets or where large volumes. of traffic exist in one direction of travel only. Because traffic in the other direction is not considered, developing one-way progression is relatively easy. Two-way progression allows both directions of traffic to travel through the maximum number of intersections without having to stop, which presents more difficulties than one-way progression. Ideal signal progression would result in all vehicles arriving on the green phase at each intersection of a coordinated signal system. Progression is dependent on several factors, including cycle length, vehicle speed, and signal spacing. The signal progression that is developed can change based on different peak periods of traffic (AM, noon, PM) during the day. FM 11-09 Signal System Evaluation Page 3 4-7 The best progression can be achieved if signal spacing is uniform. If signals are evenly spaced throughout a system, maximum efficiency for the signal system can result. If signals are closely spaced or non -uniform, the amount of time available for motorists to travel uninterrupted through a system is reduced, decreasing the efficiency of the coordinated signal system. Time -space diagrams are used to present the signal splits at each intersection and to show the progression available through a coordinated signal system. Locations for future signals that have minimal impact on the existing progression can be identified by reviewing these time -space diagrams. Traffic volumes obtained through the 24-hour and turning movement counts were used in analyzing the need for an additional through lane on FM 1709. The roadway was designed and built with shoulders that can be restriped as through lanes. The existing through volumes on FM 1709 were compared to ideal, planning level capacity numbers to identify which sections of the road need additional capacity. Results Table 1 on the following page shows the results of the coupling analysis performed along FM 1709. Twenty-four hour tube counts were not collected between each intersection. For these cases, which are indicated by an asterisk in the table, volumes between the intersections were estimated based on the turning movement counts and volumes of the adjacent links. From the results in Table 1, the following segments of the FM 1709 section evaluated should definitely be coordinated during each of the peak time periods, unless otherwise specified: Between Davis Boulevard and Southridge Lakes Parkway, Between White Chapel Boulevard and Carroll Avenue (PM only), and Between Carroll Avenue and Kimball Avenue. These segments were located near the West and East boundaries of the FM 1709 section. All but one of the remaining links (between Pearson Lane and Davis Boulevard in the noon peak) had a coupling index between 0.3 and 0.5, indicating that these intersections should be considered for coordination. Based on these results, all signalized intersections on this section of FM 1709 were included for coordination. The results of the computer analysis indicated that for the AM and noon peak periods, a cycle length of 85 seconds would produce the widest progression band at the shortest cycle. A cycle length of 125 seconds resulted from the analysis for the PM peak period. The resulting cycle lengths and progression bands developed using PASSER II and Synchro 3 can be seen in Table 2. For each of these cycle lengths, the splits and the offsets change to account for the variation in volumes that occur at different times during the day. The recommended splits for each peak period can be seen in the corresponding time -space diagram in Figures 2 to 4. Although all of the FM 1709 Signal Scstem Evaluation Page 4 4-8 Is im Table 1. Coupling Indices for FM 1709 Intersection Length (feet) Coupling Index AM NOON PM Pearson Lane 5100 0.34 0.27 0.39 Davis Boulevard 3400 0.68 0.55 0.77 Peytonville Avenue 1700 1.41 * 1.18 * 1.65 Southridge Lakes Parkway 6300 0.39 0.34 0.48 White Chapel Boulevard 5200 0.48 0.39 0.54 Carroll Avenue 3500 0.67 * 0.56 * 0.79 * Village Center 1700 1.37 * 1.16 * 1.62 * Kimball Avenue *Volumes estimated from adjacent link volumes and turning movement counts Table 2. Cycle Lengths and Progression Bandwidths Peak Period Cycle Length (sec) Progression Bandwidth (sec) EB WB AM 85 37 7 Noon 85 22 20 PM 125 20 49 FS11709 Signal System Evaluation Page .i 4-9 QW signalized intersections have pedestrian buttons, these recommended timing plans were developed under the assumption that few pedestrians use FM 1709. Therefore, these timing plans may not provide adequate time for pedestrians to cross the street. If pedestrian timings had been provided, longer cycles and less efficient operation would result. While the timing plans will be interrupted when a pedestrian button is pushed, the timing plans will resume normal operation within a few cycles. Locations of future traffic signals which have minimal impact on the existing progression were determined by examining the time -space diagrams in Figures 2 to 4. The location of planned and existing unsignalized intersections was considered in identifying these locations. Traffic signals should only be placed between intersections that have minimal impact, if any, on progression and have adequate spacing available for the additional signal. The four locations on FM 1709 which meet these criteria are designated by a letter (A, B, C, D) at the bottom of the time -space diagrams. These signal locations should have minimal effects on the current signal progression on FM 1709. Two-way signal progression may be impacted in the PM peak period by locations A, C, and D. Improvements could allow the current two-way progression to remain or be improved in all peaks. Improvements include changing the split phasing that currently exists on most of the cross streets to concurrent phasing. Using lead -lag phasing for traffic on FM 1709 could also produce wider progression bands. For planning purposes, an arterial street such as FM 1709 has a capacity of approximately Q'I 800 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl). Results of the progression plan indicated that several of the through movements were operating with volume -to -capacity ratios greater than 1.0. As a result, high delays occur and poor level -of -service is provided at these intersections. Table 3 presents the peak directional through volumes per lane for each intersection on FM 1709. Many of these existing volumes are close to or exceed the 800 vphpl capacity. Table 3. ThrouLyh Volumes on FM 1709 Intersection Through Volumes (vphpl) EB - AM WB - PM Pearson Lane 590 570 Davis Boulevard 569 494 Peytonville Avenue 846 833 Southridge Lakes Parkway 778 i 596 White Chapel Boulevard 913 851 Carroll Avenue 972 846 Village Center 932 890 Kimball Avenue 688 766 FM 1709 Signal System Evaluation Page 9 4-10 II-t (11) 30NVISIO cn a��L <Co �� <;o <�- �m� mz n �— wcv �a zLnn M Q a 8 v 0069Z OOZSZ OOLIZ 00991 OOZOI OOSS OOIS 0 �— ,OOLI- ►1- ,OOS£ ►1- ,OOLI ,OOti£ 0 i - ,OOIS ,0n9 -i- ,OOZS 0 1"As ssao a tl € jooiis uion e y6noi41 8M 9 •, 46na4193 9 N m +o•JIs U!on s � AD c m O 0 N n C Z s 09 OZl o a- n O 091 l � hl IT1 0 m n O d o` < otz 00£ a W C d N S 0 09£ 0 a • 0 OZY T • OSq I Zi-V soxal `G�DIq}noS Stlll'00 XIN30Nd DUik33u L� 6996•IOL•ZL6Xbd E996•IOL•ZL6 (03S C�=0) WDa6niQ a�DdS—quail anOH �Dad NOON DtZSL S7X31 'SM10 OU 311ns (60L LWU) 'CIA18 3AV` H1f10S .2 aan5id OYOa A3MYA 511186 £Zf9 (11) 30NVISIO zr o n r a a 8 M I"1 0069Z OOZSZ OOLIZ 00991 OOZOI 0099 f---,OOL t ,OOS£ ,OOL l ,OOb£ 100£9 p i 0 OOZS IooI'S �a a a o Do o _ Wnl Ilol I�Iis �IDM 9M L H .ODOZ =. I 11 + y6no 83 ND 31YOS U"jo I"ils UIDV( J3X o W ap Z CA/1 s C H 0019 y 0 N 0 09 OZt Ie ON Recommendations Based on this evaluation of the signal system on FM 1709 between Pearson Lane and Kimball Avenue, it was determined that signal coordination was necessary. Therefore, the following recommendations are made: • All of the signalized intersections between Pearson Lane and Kimball Avenue should be coordinated. • An 85 second cycle should be used for the AM and noon peak periods. • A 125 second cycle should be used for the PM peak period. • The splits recommended in the time -space diagrams in Figures 2 to 4 should be used to coordinate the signal system on FM 1709. • Consider changing existing split phasing to concurrent phasing for the following cross streets, that either have exclusive left turn lanes on the cross -street or adequate pavement width for an exclusive left turn lane, to increase the time available for through movements on FM 1709: Peytonville Avenue ► Southridge Lakes Parkway All of the other intersections along FM 1709, except Davis Boulevard, do not have exclusive left turn lanes on the cross -street. These intersections and the Davis Boulevard intersection should be carefully studied before considering concurrent phasing. Efforts should be made to provide concurrent phasing on the cross streets at future signal locations. Pedestrian buttons should be provided at future signal locations. Based on the evaluation of the through capacity and volumes on FM 1709, restriping the existing shoulder to provide a third through lane is recommended along the following sections: • From Davis Boulevard to SH 114 in the eastbound direction, and • From Kimball Avenue to Davis Boulevard in the westbound direction. Based on a review of the time -space diagrams and the resulting progression, locations on FM 1709 where future signals will not impede the proposed progression are indicated with letters at the bottom of the time -space diagrams. These locations, and their approximate optimal distances include: • A - Between Pearson Lane and Davis Boulevard (2800-3100 feet East of Pearson Lane) • B - Intersection with Shady Oaks Drive (3700 feet East of Southridge Lakes Parkway) • C - Intersection with Byron Nelson Parkway (2500 feet East of White Chapel Boulevard) • D - Between Carroll Avenue and Village Center (1600-2000 feet East of Carroll Avenue) FAA 1709 Signal Svstem Evaluation Page 10 4-14 City of Southlake, Texas i MEMORANDUM February 5, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director Chris Carpenter, Comprehensive Planner SUBJECT: Status Report - Village Center East Circulation Study As you are aware, on November 18, 1997, City Council directed staff to look at. circulation issues and potential collector -level streets that might impact the area known as Village Center East per the Corridor Study, as well as corresponding impacts south of F.M. 1709. The study is being conducted based on several factors: topography, tract locations, land ownership patters, potential development scenarios, and others. The "technical" aspects of the analysis have been completed and we are in the landowner -feedback stage at this point. In the meantime, we would like to inform you of several important elements of progress. First, a certified letter was sent to property owners in the western portion of Village Center East (divided from the east by roughly the drainage channel in the Crooked Lane area), urging the property owners to meet with staff to solicit their input concerning the need for and possible alignments of a future roadway. This group of properties was seen as a separate entity from those to the east of the major drainage divide. This meeting was held on January 27, 1998, to informally discuss the analysis and some initial options, as well as to discuss the concerns and suggestions of the property owners. One result of the meeting was a general consensus among the participants that a future collector -level street, if there were a need for one, should be aligned in a rough approximation to "Option C" on the attached graphic sheet. Some of the favorable comments from the participants at the meeting included the ability to locate this possible roadway on common lot lines in many areas, a straighter alignment (and less associated cost), and an increase in potential value to properties that would have additional public road frontage. To date, no technical detriments to this proposed alignment have surfaced in the technical analysis; however, some concern has been expressed by Ray Williamson (Hilltop Country Acres) related to any R.O.W. dedication. L:T0N1DEV\WP-FILES'PROJECTS\CORRIDOR\VC-EAST\VCE WS.WPD 4-15 City of Southlake, Texas Another consensus item was the need to get feedback from property owners who were not in attendance at the first meeting. Therefore, a second certified letter was sent to the property owners, summarizing the meeting and urging the absent property owners to contact staff to discuss the analysis. At this time, staff has received three additional sets of comments from property owners who were not in attendance: • Gordon Nettleton, representing the Nettleton tract on the attached graphic, stated he did not mind the possibility of a road in that area, and he wanted to relay the fact that his property is currently under contract for sale. His only concern would be dedicating a large portion of usable property for the right-of-way. • Glen Scott Harrell, representing the Harrell and Stevenson tracts on the attached graphic, has no real problems with the initially accepted "Option C" other than the, fact that the new north -south road might serve as a cut -through to S.H. 114 and he does not want to lose an inordinate amount of property to right-of-way. • E. C. White, representing the White tract on the attached graphic, said he had no problems with a proposed road, but would prefer the curve geometry on his property to be more like the "Option B" configuration, curving back to then follow the line of "Option C." He feels that this would assist with his ability to use his remaining piece of property to the north in a better fashion. As mentioned on the first page, another element of this study involves the development and roadway scenarios for the "Eastern Section" of Village Center East and how both the west and east interface, if at all. Staff is comfortable with the fact that the eastern and western sections can develop with separate access plans, due mainly to a large drainage channel which serves as a natural divide between the two which would be difficult and expensive to traverse. A certified letter will be mailed in the coming days to the property owners on the east side of the drainage channel to solicit their input. We anticipate scheduling a public hearing before P&Z with the first draft of the Circulation Study at their second meeting in February or their first meeting in March. Please forward any comments or questions you may have to me at Ext. 744 or Chris Carpenter at Ext. 866. Please place this item on the agenda for the upcoming Council work session. GL/cic enc: Village Center East preliminary proposed roadway alignments provided to property owners at the 1/27/98 meeting List of attendees from January 27, 1998, meeting L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES',PROJECTS\CORRIDOR\VC-EAS'nWE_WS. WPD 4-16 L, MEETING SIGN -IN Village Center East Roadway Analysis - January 27, 1998 Name Com an / Address Phone Fax a ,� ��,cl- /� /� -Ile e z����<<�f -136 l 817-471 2,09 A7- y2 g4li L� ��►� hoe v e,.4- Q 46) 1:\comdev\wp-files\projects\corridor\vc-east\sign-in.doc Page 1 4-18 Aw L� LI City of Southlake, Texas --- ----- .MEMORANDUM February 6, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Neighborhood Sewer Program Extension FY95-96 was the first of a three year program of providing sanitary sewer to neighborhoods. The neighborhoods (subdivisions) for the Phase 1 Program were Vista Trails, Cimarron Acres, Emerald Estates, Highland Estates and Whispering Dell Estates. The number of lots and those that have had sewer made available in each subdivision are presented in the following table dated June 3, 1997: PHASE I Subdivision # of Lots # of Lots Paid & Connected Percent to the Sewer System Connected as to 02106198 Vista Trails 70 32 46 Cimarron Acres 18 3 17 Emerald Estates 49 32 65 Highland Estates 17 4 24 Whispering Dell 38 12 29 PHASE II Subdivision Diamond Circle Estates Mission Hill Estates Huntwick Estates Raintree/Shady Lane Area Construction 90% complete March 3, start date 20% complete 10% complete 5-1 I 11 DJth Q City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 6, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Cross Connection Control Policy BACKGROUND A cross connection is defined as an actual or potential direct or indirect connection between a potable water supply and non -potable water (any water suspected or containing any pollutant or contaminant). The most common example of a cross connection is a portion of an irrigation or sprinkler line connected to a house water supply; however, a cross connection can also be classified as a natural gas line, chemical line, petroleum products storage or backflow between various parts of a plumbing system. The greatest concern is a cross connection in an industrial or commercial building; hospitals or medical facilities; and schools. ' requirement is stated as follows within Title 30 of the TNRCC s backflow protection q , Texas Administrative Code: "No water connection from any public drinking water supply system shall be make to any establishment where an actual or potential contamination or system hazard exists without an air gap separation between the drinking water supply and the source of potential contamination. The containment air gap is sometimes impractical and, instead, reliance must be placed on individual "internal" air gaps or mechanical backflow prevention devices. Under these conditions, additional protection shall be required at the meter in the form of a backflow prevention device (in accordance with AWWA standards C510 and C511, and AWWA Manual M14) on those establishments handling substances deleterious or hazardous to the public health. The water purveyor need not require backflow protection at the water service entrance if an adequate cross -connection control program is in effect that includes an annual inspection and testing by a certified backflow prevention device tester. It will be the responsibility of the water purveyor to ensure that these requirements are met. " 6-1 The City of Ft. Worth has adopted a cross connection policy. According to the agreement between the City of Southlake and the City of Ft. Worth for the purchase of water, the City of Southlake must adopt similar water distribution ordinances and policies as Ft. Worth. DISCUSSION The attached draft ordinance incorporates TNRCC requirements including yearly inspection of all backflow assemblies. A Utility Operator from the Water Utilities Division will be responsible for inspecting facilities that pose a potential health hazard. The inspections are done with the aid of a plumbing inspector and various records and reports will be maintained, as required by TNRCC. These records will be reviewed by TNRCC during its annual audit of the water system. Any water connection customer that is required to have a backflow device or assembly will have a yearly test of these assemblies by a state certified inspector and a copy of this report made available to the City. The cost of this testing and any repairs is the responsibility of the customer. Customers with yard irrigation systems are expected to meet the annual testing requirement of their backflow devices beginning two years after the adoption of the ordinance. It is possible that a significant number of these devices will require repair or replacement or require installation of a backflow device. This will impose additional Qe costs and inconveniences on some water customers, but will increase the level of safety in our public water system. It is important to remember that if the City's monthly tests of its water system show a high bacteriological count, the City must advertise this in the newspaper to alert water customers. Other issues to consider: • This policy does not require that a large backflow preventer be installed at the curb. Smaller backflow assemblies installed within the interior of the structure are sufficient. Builders often install these devices to protect the flow of water within the building. • A backflow preventer assembly is not always required. According to the Uniform Plumbing Code, if a system is properly designed to provide continuous flow, such a device is not necessary. • The devices to prevent backflow from wells and sprinkler systems are very simple and do not impose an overwhelming burden on the customer. We will present this proposed ordinance and related policy to Council in the near future. We would like any comments or concerns Council may have prior to refining 6-2 A the ordinance and placing it on a regular agenda. The City Attorney will review the ordinance and policy, as well. CRE Attachments: Proposed Cross Connection Control Ordinance 6-3 LORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL POLICY FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF CROSS CONNECTIONS AS DEFINED BY THE TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLUMBING CODE; PROVIDING FOR VARIANCES TO THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its power adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code: and WHEREAS, the City Council deems that it may be necessary to adopt a Cross Connection Control Policy containing cross connection design and installation standards in order to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City and the public in general. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. There is hereby adopted a Cross Connection Control Police for the City of Southlake as provided in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. The Cross Connection Control Policy adopted herein shall have the force and effect of law. 6-a SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in -,t-hich event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrases, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 4. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance or the Cross Connection Control Policy adopted herein shall be fined not more than Dollars (S :') for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 5. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. or any other ordinances affecting which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. 6-5 SECTION 6. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after the passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF ,1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY 6-6 C EXHIBIT "A" CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL POLICY FOR PUBLIC DRINKING WATER DEFINITIONS Unless a provision explicitly states otherwise, the following terms and phrases, as used in this article shall have the meanings hereinafter designated. If a word or term used in Division of this article is not contained in the following list, it shall have the definition provided for such word or term in the 9th (ninth) edition of the Manual of Cross Connection Control published by the Foundation for Cross Connection Control and Hydraulic Research, University of Southern California: Approved backflow prevention assembly (or Backflow assembly or assembly) an assembly to counteract backpressure or prevent backsiphonage. This assembly must appear on the list of approved assemblies issued by the City of Southlake. Auxiliary supply any water source or system other than the public water system, that may be available in the building or on any property. AVB atmospheric vacuum breaker. Backflow (a) The flow in the direction opposite to the normal flow; or (b) The introduction of any foreign liquids, gases, or substances into the public water system. Backflow assembly (see "Approved backflow prevention assembly") Boresight (or boresight to daylight) providing adequate drainage for backflow prevention assemblies installed in vaults through the use of an unobstructed drain pipe. Commission the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission and its successor agencies. Contamination the presence in or entry into a public water supply system of any substance which may be deleterious to the public health and/or the quality of the water. 6-7 Cross connection any physical arrangement where a potable water supply is actually or potentially connected with any non -potable water system, used water system or auxiliary water supply, sewer, drain conduit, swimming pool, storage reservoir, plumbing fixture, swamp cooler, air conditioning unit, fire protection system, or any other assembly which may be capable of imparting contamination to the public water system as a result of backflow. Bypass arrangements, jumper connections, removable sections, swivel or change over assemblies, or other temporary or permanent assemblies through which, or because of which. backflow may occur are considered to be cross connections. DC double check valve backflow prevention assembly. DDC double detector check valve assembly. Degree of hazard the low or high hazard classification that shall be attached to all actual or potential cross connections. Department the Department of Public Works of the City of Southlake. Director the City of Southlake's Director of Public Works or the Director's authorized representative. Double check valve backflow prevention assembly (or double check assembly or double check) an assembly which consists of two independently operating check valves which are spring -loaded or weighted. The assembly comes complete with a gate vale on each side of the checks, as well as test cocks to test the checks for tightness. Drinking water water distributed for human consumption, for use in preparing food or beverages, or for use in cleaning a utensil or article used in preparing food or beverages, or for use in cleaning a utensil or article used in preparing food or beverages for , or consuming food or beverages by, human beings. Health hazard an actual or potential threat of contamination of a physical or toxic nature dangerous to health, to the public potable water system or a consumer's potable water system. Human consumption uses by humans in which water can be ingested into or absorbed by the human body. Examples of these include, but are not limited to, drinking, cooking brushing, brushing teeth, bathing, washing hands, preparing foods, and washing dishes, utensils, and other articles used in the preparation or consumption of food. Inspector a person that is a certified cross connection inspector employed by or under contract with the city. C., -2- 6-8 Low hazard the classification assigned to a cross connection that could potentially allow a substance that may be objectionable but not hazardous to a person's health to backflow into the potable water supply. Non-residential use includes all uses not specifically included in "residential use." Non potable water water not fit for drinking, personal or culinary utilization. Plumbing code the Plumbing Code adopted by ordinance by the City. Plumbing hazard an internal or plumbing -type cross connection in a consumer's potable water system than may be either a pollution or a contamination hazard. Point -of -use isolation assembly the appropriate backflow prevention within a consumer's water system at a point at which a cross connection exist Pollutant polluted water, dredged spoil, solid waste, incinerator residue, sewage (including sewage from boats), garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, toxic materials, radioactive materials, heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt, and industrial, municipal, and agricultural waste. It shall not mean sewage sludge, rock sand, dredged spoil, or cellar dirt when said material is used by the City for fill or reuse. Pollution the man-made or man -induced alteration of the chemical, PY g physical, biological, or radiological integrity of water. Pollution hazard an actual or potential threat to the physical properties of the public water system or the potability of the public or consumer's potable water system but which would not constitute a health or system hazard. The maximum degree of intensity of pollution to which potable water system could be degraded under this definition would cause a nuisance or be aesthetically objectionable or could cause minor damage to the system or its appurtenances. Potable water Water free from impurities present in amounts sufficient to cause disease or harmful physiological effects and conforming in bacteriological and chemical quality to the requirements of the Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards or the regulations of the public health authority having jurisdiction. Potable water supply any water supply intended or used for human consumption or other domestic use; also any water which is potable. Premise isolation the appropriate backflow prevention at the service connection between the public water system and the water user. 6-s Public water system public or privately owned system which supplies water for human consumption. The system includes all service lines to the meter, reservoirs, facilities, and equipment used in the process of producing, treating, storing or conveying water for public consumption. PVB pressure vacuum breaker. Reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly or (reduced pressure principle assembly or RP assembly or RP) an assembly containing two independently acting approved check valves together with a hydraulically -operated, mechanically independent pressure differential relief valve located between the check valves and at the same time below the first check valve. The assembly shall include properly located test cocks and tightly closing shut-off valves at the end of the assembly. Residential use single family dwellings, duplexes, multiplex housing and apartments where the individual units are each on a separate meter; or, in cases where two or more units are served by one meter, the units are full-time dwellings. Service connection the point of delivery up to and including water meters through which the public water system furnishes water to a user. After this point the system has no control over use. System (see "Public water system") System hazard means an actual or potential threat of severe danger to the physical properties of the public or a consumer's potable water supply, or an actual or potential threat of pollution or contamination that would have a detrimental effect on the quality of the potable water in the system. Tester a person that is a certified backflow prevention assembly technician approved and registered with the Director. Thermal expansion heated water that does not have the space to expand. Used water means water supplied by a public water system to a water user's system after it has passed through the service connection. Wholesale customer means a utility customer of the City which is a municipality, town, village, or other governmental entity, or a private firm contracting with a governmental entity for the provision of water and /or wastewater treatment service. SECTION I 6-10 A. Connection of Private Water Supply to the city system. (1) An offense is committed if a person connects any well, tank, cistern, or any other private water supply with the City's water supply system without written permission of the Director. (2) A well, tank, cistern, or other private water supply connected to the City's water supply shall at all times meet all water hygiene standards established by the Commission. All connections shall comply with the "Plumbing Code" with this Ordinance or any other ordinance regulating cross connections. (3) The Director shall not be required to supply water through a meter to a private supply that does not meet the standards of Section I. SECTION II A. Purpose. Pursuant to Title 30, Texas Administrative Code, Section 290.44, it is the responsibility of the City of Southlake to protect its drinking water supply by instituting and enforcing a cross connection program. The purpose of this Division, therefore, is to comply with the above - cited regulatory requirements and to protect the water supply of the City of Southlake from contamination or pollution due to any cross connections. B. Cost of Compliance The cost of complying with these regulations shall be the responsibility of the property owners and their lessees. These costs include but are not limited to purchasing, installation, testing and repair of the assembly. These costs shall also include point -of -use and premise isolation assemblies. Any cost incurred by the City to enforce this Division is the responsibility of the property owners and their lessees. C. Responsibilities of Owners and Lessee. (1) It is the responsibility of all property owners and lessees to abide by the conditions of this Division. If changes are made to a premises' plumbing system, the property owner or lessee shall obtain a plumbing permit from the City. (2) The owner of leased premises is responsible for the installation, testing and repair of all backflow assemblies on the premises. When the lessee changes, the owner shall immediately notify the Building Inspections Division. -5- 6-11 D. Backflow Prevention Assembly Requirements. (1) A certified cross connection inspector employed by or under contract with the City shall determine the type and location of backflow assembly to be installed within the City's service area. (2) At a minimum, a backflow prevention assembly will be required in each of the following circumstances: (a) When the nature and extent of any activity at a premises, or the materials used in connection with any activity at a premises, or materials stored at a premises, could contaminate or pollute the potable water supply. (b) When a premises has one or more cross connections. (c) When internal cross connections are present that are not correctable. (d) When intricate plumbing arrangements are present that make it impractical to ascertain whether cross connections exist; (e) When a premises has a repeated history of cross connections being established or re-established. (f) When entry to a premises 1s unduly restricted so that inspections for cross connections cannot be made with sufficient frequency to assure that cross connections do not exist. (g) When materials are being used such that, if backflow should occur, a health hazard could result. (h) When installation of an approved backflow prevention assembly is deemed by an Inspector to be necessary to accomplish the purpose of these regulations. (i) When an appropriate cross connection survey report form has not been filed with the Director. (j) When a fire sprinkler system using non -potable piping material is connected to the City's water system. (k) When a building is constructed on commercial premises, and the end use of such building is not determined or could change, a backflow backsiphon protection requirement will be determined at occupancy. -6- 6-12 ce (1) If a premises is required to have backflow prevention assemblies, but water cannot be turned off during the testing of such assemblies, the premises shall be equipped with dual backflow prevention assemblies of the same type so that testing, repair and maintenance can be performed. (m) If a point -of -use isolation assembly has not been tested or repaired as required by this division, a premise isolation assembly shall be required. (n) If an Inspector determines that additions or rearrangements have been made to the plumbing system without the proper permits as required by the Plumbing Code, premise isolation shall be required. (o) Multistory buildings or any building with a booster pump or elevated storage tank, or any possible hazard exists. (p) Retrofitting shall be required on all high hazard connections and wherever else the Director deems retrofitting necessary. (3) Any premises requiring multiple service connections for adequacy of supply and/or fire protection shall have a backflow assembly on each service connection. The assembly shall be commensurate with the degree of potential hazard that could occur in the event of an interconnect between any of the buildings on the premises. (4) The owner or person in control of any premises commits an offense if he/she knowingly fails to install and maintain backflow prevention assemblies as required by this Section. (5) A person commits an offense if backflow from premises he/she owns, operates or manages enters the public water supply system. E. Residential Service Connections. If the Director determines that residential premises have a cross connection, said premises shall be equipped with an approved backflow prevention assembly installed in accordance with this Ordinance. F. Plumbing Code. As a condition of water service, customers shall install, maintain, and operate their piping and plumbing systems in accordance with the Plumbing Code. If there is a conflict between -7- 6-13 this Article and the Plumbing Code, the more stringent shall apply. G. Installation Requirements. (1) Backflow prevention assemblies shall be installed in accordance with the following requirements, to ensure their proper operation and accessibility: (a) Backflow prevention assemblies shall be installed in accordance with the Plumbing Code and this Ordinance. The assembly installer shall obtain the required plumbing permits prior to installation and shall have the assembly inspected by a certified cross connection inspector and as required by the Plumbing Code. (b) No part of a reduced pressure principle Backflow prevention assembly shall be submerged in water or installed in a location subject to flooding. If a double check valve assembly is installed in a vault, brass plugs shall be maintained in the test ports at all times and adequate drainage shall be provided. (c) Assemblies shall be installed at the service connection of the water supply, before any branch in the line, and on private property located just inside the boundary of the City's right-of-way. An inspector may specify other areas for installation of the assembly. 1 hall be protected from freezing and other severe weather (d) The assembly s p g conditions. (e) All backflow prevention assemblies shall be of a type and model approved by the Director. (f) All vertical installations shall be approved in writing by the Director prior to installation. Assemblies shall be approved by the manufacturer for this type of installation. (g) The assembly shall be readily accessible with adequate room for maintenance and testing. Assemblies two (2) inches and smaller shall have at least a six (6) inch clearance on all sides of the assembly. All assemblies larger than two (2) inches shall have a minimum clearance of twelve (12) inches on the back side, -s- 6-14 twenty four (24) inches on the test cock side, twelve (12) inches below the assembly and thirty six (36) inches above the assembly. "Y" pattern double check valve assemblies shall be installed so that the checks are horizontal and the test cocks face upward. See Standard Detail Sheets 1 and 2. (h) If the Director grants written permission to install the backflow assembly inside of a building, the assembly shall be readily accessible between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. (i) If an assembly is installed pursuant to subsection (1)(h), and is four (4) inches or larger and is installed five (5) feet or higher above the floor, it shall be equipped with a rigidly and permanently installed scaffolding acceptable to the Director. This installation shall also meet all applicable requirements set out by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the State of Texas occupational safety and health laws. (j) RP assemblies may be installed in a vault only if relief valve discharge can be drained to daylight through a boresight type drain. The drain shall be made of adequate capacity to carry the full rated flow of the assembly and shall be screened on both ends. (k) An approved air gap shall be located at the relief valve orifice of RP Ce assemblies. This air gap shall be at least twice the inside diameter of the incoming supply line as measured vertically above the top rim of the drain and in no case less than one (1) inch. (1) Upon completion of installation, the property owner shall notify the Director to test and inspect the assemblies. The property owner shall register all backflow assemblies with the Director. Registration shall consist of date of installation, manufacturer, model, serial number of the backflow prevention assembly, and the initial test report. (2) A person commits an offense if he installs a backflow prevention assembly in violation of this Ordinance. (3) A person commits an offense if he fails to notify the Director to inspect a backflow prevention assembly after its installation as required by this Ordinance. (4) A person commits an offense if he fails to register a backflow prevention assembly as required by this Ordinance. H. Testing of Assemblies. (1) The Director will inspect and test, or cause to be inspected and tested, all assemblies -9- 6-15 in each of the following circumstances: (a) immediately after installation; (b) whenever the assembly is moved; (c) a minimum of once a year for all double check assemblies and pressure vacuum breakers; (d) any premise that has RP assemblies as point -of -use isolation without high hazard premise isolation protection must be tested every six months; and (e) any premise that has an RP assembly as premise isolation without high hazard point -of -use isolation must be tested every six months. (2) Assemblies may be required to be tested more frequently if the Director deems necessary. (3) All assembly testing shall be performed by a certified and registered backflow prevention assembly tester, in accordance with City -approved test procedures. (4) It is the responsibility of the property owner and the person in control of the premises to have all assemblies tested in accordance with this division. (5) The owner or person in control of premises commits an offense if he knowingly fails or refuses to have the backflow prevention assemblies installed on said premises inspected or tested as required by this Ordinance. (6) The City shall not be liable for damage to an assembly that occurs during testing, when such damage results from metal fatigue or deteriorated metal, or when such damage occurs under standard testing procedures. I. Maintenance of Assemblies. (1) A person who owns, operates, or manages premises in which required backflow prevention assemblies are installed, shall maintain such assemblies in proper working order at all times, including repair as required. (2) Backflow prevention assemblies shall be maintained in a manner that allows them to be tested by a method that has been approved by the Director. (3) A person commits an offense if he/she knowingly fails to maintain backflow prevention assemblies in compliance with this Section. (40" -t o- 6-16 (4) A person commits an offense if he/she knowingly fails to comply with a repair (W order issued by the Director. J. Thermal expansion. It is the responsibility of the property owner to eliminate the possibility of thermal expansion, if a closed system has been created by the installation of a backflow assembly. K. Pressure Loss. Any water pressure drop caused by the installation of a backflow assembly shall not be the responsibility of the City. The Department may give reasonable assistance to a property owner regarding information on adequate sizing of assemblies and proper plumbing practices to provide for required pressure and flows for fire protection. L. Mobile Units. (1) A person who owns or operates any vehicle that uses water from the City's public water system shall obtain a use permit from the Director before accessing the public water system. The Director may require a fixed air gap or backflow assembly mounted either on the vehicle or piping. (2) The failure of the owner or operator of the vehicle to comply with this Section shall be grounds for the City to revoke any permit or license required under the City Code to operate the vehicle or the business for which such vehicle is used. (3) The Director may deny a use permit to any person who is not in compliance with this Section or who has a history of violating the requirements of this Ordinance. (d) A person commits an offense if he/she operates or causes to be operated a vehicle in violation of this Ordinance. M. Wholesale Customers. Every wholesale customer that has a contract for water services with the City shall have an active, ongoing cross connection program approved by the Director. The City reserves the right to require a reduced pressure principle assembly at the interconnect. N. Right-of-way Encroachment. -11- 6-17 Ce (1) No person shall install or maintain a backflow prevention assembly upon or within any City right-of-way except as provided by this Section. (2) No encroachment agreement will be necessary, but all other permits required by to perform work in the right-of-way shall be obtained. (3) A backflow prevention assembly required by this Ordinance may be installed upon or within any City right-of-way only if the owner proves to the City that there is no other feasible location for installing the assembly, and installing it in the right-of- way will not interfere with traffic or utilities. The City retains the right to approve the location, height, depth, enclosure, and other requisites of the assembly prior to its installation. (4) The assembly shall be installed below or flush with the surrounding grade except when it is not practicable to install it in this manner. Any assembly or portion of an assembly which extends aboveground shall be located no closer than eighteen (18) inches to the face of the curb, or two feet from the property line or streets without curbs. (5) A property owner shall, at the request of the City and at the owner's sole expense, relocate a backflow prevention assembly which encroaches upon any City right-of-way when such relocation is necessary for street or utility construction or repairs or for (moo, purposes of public safety. (6) A person commits an offense if he/she installs or maintains a backflow prevention assembly in violation of this Section. (7) A person commits an offense if he/she fails to relocate a backflow prevention assembly located in or upon any City right-of-way after receiving a written order from the City to do so. (8) A backflow prevention assembly installed or maintained in City right-of-way in violation of this Section or an order issued pursuant to this Section is hereby declared to be a nuisance. C -12- 6-18 SECTION II A. Certification of Cross Connection Inspectors. Inspectors performing cross connection control duties within the City of Southlake must be certified by the Director and shall meet the following requirements: (1) Be employed by or under contract with the City of Southlake; (2) Must be a licensed plumber, plumbing inspector, or certified by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) as a water operator with an endorsement for customer service inspector. SECTION III B. Certification of Backflow Prevention Assembly Testers. (1) No person shall operate as a backflow prevention assembly tester within the City without being State certified and registering with the City. (2) At the time of certification, recertification, and upon the Director's request, each person certified as a backflow prevention assembly tester shall furnish evidence to show that he/she is insured and bonded to_ perform services on private property, and has current all licenses required by the State of Texas and the City to perform the contemplated services. (3) A person commits an offense if he/she knowingly performs as a backflow prevention assembly tester within the City without being registered with the City. C. Certified Backflow Prevention Assembly Tester Responsibilities (1) No certified backflow assembly tester shall operate within the City without first registering with the Director. (2) A registration shall remain in effect provided: (a) The tester maintains eligibility for registration and certification; (b) Registration is not revoked by the Director. (3) Upon recertifying, a tester shall renew his/her registration with the Director. If a certification remains expired for a period of one year, the tester shall reestablish registration eligibility. -1 3- 6-19 (4) Each applicant for registration shall: (a) Provide evidence to the Director to establish that the applicant has available the necessary tools and equipment to properly test backflow prevention assemblies. (b) Provide evidence to the Director that the applicant has successfully completed "Permit Confined Space Entry Training" as specified by Federal Occupational Safety and Health Agency's 29 CFR 1910.146; and (c) Identify all test gauges the applicant will use in testing backflow prevention assemblies. (5) A registered backflow prevention assembly tester shall: (a) File the serial number of each of his/her test kits with the Director; (b) Annually have each recorded test kit tested for accuracy and calibrated to maintain a 2 % accuracy factor, and file a copy of such testing to the Director: (c) Perform competent and accurate certifications of each backflow prevention assembly tested and shall submit complete reports thereof to the Director; (d) List registered serial numbers of test gauges on tests and maintenance reports prior to submitting them to the Director; and (e) Shall not change the design or operation characteristics of a backflow prevention assembly. (6) The Director may revoke a registration if the Director determines that the tester: (a) has made false, incomplete, or inaccurate assembly testing reports; (b) has used inaccurate gauges; (c) has used improper testing procedures; (d) has expired insurance; (e) is not in compliance with safety regulations; (7) A person commits an offense if he/she operates as a backflow prevention assembly tester within the City without a valid registration issued by the Director. C -14- 6-20 SECTION IV A. Reduced Pressure Principle Backflow Prevention Assembly (RP). (1) RP's may be utilized at premises where a substance is handled that would be hazardous to the public health if introduced into the potable water system. An RP is normally used in locations where an air gap is impractical. An RP is effective against both backsiphonage and backpressure. (2) RP's shall be sized to provide an adequate supply of water and pressure for the premises being served. Flow characteristics are not standard. Consult manufacturer's specifications for specific performance data. (3) Premises where interruption of water supply is critical shall be provided with two assemblies installed in parallel. They shall be sized in such a manner that either assembly will provide the minimum water requirements while the two together will provide the maximum flow required. (4) Bypass lines are prohibited. Pipe fittings which could be used for connecting a bypass line shall not be installed. (5) Installation. (a) The assembly shall be readily accessible for testing and maintenance and shall be located in an area where water damage to buildings or furnishings will not occur from relief valve discharge. An approved air gap funnel assembly may be used to direct minor discharges away from the assembly; this assembly will not control flow in a continuous relief situation. Drain lines to accommodate full relief valve discharge flow should be considered. (b) RPs are typically installed above grade in well drained areas, but may be installed below grade if an adequate drain to daylight is provided. (c) Enclosures shall be designed for ready access and sized to allow for the minimum clearances established below. Removable protective enclosures are typically installed on the smaller assemblies. Daylight drain ports shall be provided to accommodate full pressure discharge from the assembly. 6-21 (d) All assemblies larger than two (2) inches shall have a minimum of twelve (12) (awe inches on the back side, twenty-four (24) inches on the test cock side, and the relief valve opening shall be at least twelve (12) inches plus nominal size of assembly above the floor or highest possible water level. Headroom of six (6) feet is required in vaults without a fully removable top. A minimum access opening of twenty-four (24) inches square is required on all vault lids. See Standard Detail Sheets 3 & 4. (e) Assemblies installed more than five (5) feet above floor level must have a suitable platform for use by testing or maintenance personnel. (6) The assembly must be protected from freezing and other severe weather conditions. (7) Vertical installation is prohibited. (8) Lines shall be thoroughly flushed prior to installation. A strainer with blowout tapping may be required ahead of the assembly. (9) The property owner assumes all responsibility for leaks and damage. The owner shall also see that the vault is kept reasonably free of silt and debris. (10) All RP assemblies shall be tested in accordance with this Ordinance. specifications will be evaluated on a case -by -case basis. An (11) Variances from these sp y y deviations shall be prohibited without prior written approval of the Director. B. Double Check Valve Backflow Prevention Assembly (DC). (1) Double check valve assemblies may be utilized at premises where a substance is handled that would be objectionable but not hazardous to health if introduced into the potable water system. (2) DC's shall be sized to provide an adequate supply of water and pressure for the premises being served. Flow characteristics are not standard. Consult manufacturer's specifications for specific performance data. (3) Premises where interruption of water supply is critical shall be provided with two assemblies installed in parallel. They shall be sized in such a manner that either assembly will provide the minimum water requirements while the two together will provide the maximum flow required. (4) Bypass lines are prohibited. Pipe fittings which could be used for connecting a bypass line shall not be installed. -16- 6-22 (5) (a) The assembly shall be readily accessible with adequate room for testing and maintenance. DCs may be installed below grade, providing all test cocks are fitted with brass pipe plugs. All vaults shall be well drained, constructed of suitable materials, and sized to allow for the minimum clearances established below. (b) Assemblies two (2) inches and smaller shall have at least a three (3) -inch clearance below and on both sides of the assembly, and if located in a vault, the bottom of the (24) inches below grade. All assemblies larger than two (2) inches shall have a back side, twenty-four (24) inches on the test cock side, and twelve (12) inches below the assembly. Headroom of six (6) feet is required in vaults without a fully removable top. A minimum access opening of twenty- four (24) inches square is required on all vault lids. See Standard Detail Sheets 1&2. (c) Assemblies installed more than five (5) feet above floor level shall have a suitable platform for use by testing or maintenance personnel. (6) Vertical installations are allowed on sizes up to and including four (4) inches that meet the following requirements: (a) Internally spring -loaded check valves; (b) Flow is upward through assembly; (c) Manufacturer states their assembly can be used in a vertical position; and (d) Approved by the Director. (7) The assembly shall be protected from freezing and other severe weather conditions. (8) Lines shall be thoroughly flushed prior to installation. A strainer with blowout tapping may be required ahead of the assembly. (9) The property owner assumes all responsibility for foundation or basement wall penetration, leaks, and damage. The owner shall also see that the vault is kept reasonably free of silt and debris. (10) All DC's shall be tested in accordance with this Ordinance. Tests are the responsibility of the assembly owner. The owner shall notify the Director upon installation of any backflow prevention assembly. (11) Variances from these specifications will be evaluated on a case -by -case basis. No deviations shall be permitted without prior written approval of the Director. (4,., -1 7- 6-23 C. Double Detector Check Valve Assembly (DDC). Double detector check valve assemblies may be utilized in all installations requiring a double check valve assembly and detector metering. DDCs shall comply with the installation requirements applicable for double check valve assemblies (Dcs). See Standard Detail Sheets 5&6. D. Pressure Vacuum Breaker (PVB). (1) PVBs may be utilized at point -of -use isolation only and where a substance is handled that would be objectionable but not hazardous to health if introduced into the potable water system. PVBs protect against backsiphonage only and shall not be installed where there is potential for backpressure. ' (2) The assembly shall be installed a minimum of twelve (12) inches above the highest use outlet or overflow level downstream from the assembly. See Standard Detail Sheet 6. (3) PVB's shall not be installed in an area subject to flooding or where damage would occur from water discharge. (4) The assembly shall be protected from freezing. (5) The assembly shall be readily accessible for testing and maintenance, with a minimum clearance of twelve (12) inches all around the assembly. (6) PVBs shall be located between twelve (12) inches and sixty (60) inches above ground level. (7) A strainer with blowout tapping may be required ahead of the assembly. (8) All PVB's must be tested in compliance with this Ordinance. Tests are the responsibility of the assembly owner. The owner shall notify the Director upon installation of any backflow prevention assembly. (9) Variances from these specifications will be evaluated on a case -by -case basis. No deviations shall be permitted without prior written approval of the Director. E. Atmospheric Vacuum Breaker (AVB). (1) AVB's provide minimal protection and are approved for yard irrigation systems only. AVB's protect against backsiphonage only and are prohibited where there is potential for backpressure. C -t s- 6-24 (2) The assembly shall be installed a minimum of six (6) inches above the highest use L' outlet or overflow level downstream from the assembly. See Standard Detail Sheet 7. (3) Shutoff valves downstream from the assembly are prohibited. (4) AVB's shall be allowed only for those applications where there is less than twelve (12) hours per day continuous use. (5) AVB's shall not be installed in an area subject to flooding or where damage may occur from water discharge. (6) AVB's shall be allowed for point -of -use isolation only in accordance with the Plumbing Code. AVB's are not recognized as adequate protection by the Director. so additional protection may be required. F. Air Gap Separation. (1) Air gap separations provide maximum protection from backflow hazards and may be utilized at premises where a substance is handled that would be hazardous to health if introduced into the potable water system. (2) An air gap separation shall be at least twice the diameter of the supply pipeline measured vertically above the top rim of the receiving vessel -in no case less than one (1) inch. If splashing is a problem, tubular screens may be attached or the supply line may be cut at 450 angle. The air gap distance is measured from the bottom of the angle. Hoses shall not be allowed. Standard Detail Sheet 8. (3) Air gap separations shall not be altered in any way without prior approval from the Director, and shall be available for inspection at all reasonable times. (4) Side walls, ribs or similar obstructions do not affect air gaps when spaced from the inside edge of the spout opening a distance greater than three times the diameter of the effective opening for a single, or a distance greater than four times the effective opening for two intersecting walls. (5) In cases where there are three or more side walls, ribs or similar obstructions extending from the water surface to or above the horizontal plane of the spout opening other than as specified in (d) above, the air gap shall be measured from the top of the wall. (6) The effective opening or drain shall be the minimum cross -sectional area at the seat of the control valve or the supply pipe or tubing which feeds the assembly or outlet. If two or more lines supply one outlet, the effective opening shall be the sum of the cross - sectional areas of the individual supply lines or the area of the individual supply lines or the area of the single outlet, whichever is smaller. -19- 6-25 A G. Fire Systems. An approved double check valve assembly shall be the minimum protection for fire sprinkler systems using piping material that is not approved for potable water use and/or that does not provide for periodic flow -through during each twenty-four (24) hour period, unless a variance has been issued in writing from the Director. An RP assembly shall be installed if any non - potable mixture other than the potable water can be introduced into the sprinkler system. H. Offense. A person commits an offense if he/she knowingly installs or maintains backflow prevention assemblies or air gaps in violation of this ordinance. SECTION V A. Access to Premises. (1) Every person provided water service by the City directly or indirectly shall during the hours of 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. permit the Director to enter their premises and buildings for the purposes of examination of pipes and fixtures and the manner in which the water is used. (b) If any water user refuses access to a premises during said times for inspection by an Inspector, the water user shall install a reduced pressure principle assembly at the service connection to that premise. A person commits an offense if he knowingly fails to install a reduced pressure principle assembly in accordance with this Section after receiving notice from the Director. (c) Any temporary or permanent obstruction to safe and easy access to the premises to be inspected shall be promptly removed by the water user at the written or verbal request of the Director and shall not be replaced. The costs of clearing such access shall be borne by the user. B. Emergency Suspension of Utility Service. (1) The Director may, without prior notice, suspend water service to any premises when such suspension is necessary to stop an actual or threatened backflow which: (a) presents or may present imminent and substantial danger to the environment or to the health or welfare of persons; or -20- 6-26 (b) presents or may present imminent and substantial danger to the City's public water supply. (2) As soon as is practicable after the suspension of service, the Director shall notify the owner of person in charge of the premises of the suspension in person or by certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall order such person to correct the cross connection which allowed the backflow to occur. When time permits, the Director will notify the owner or person in charge prior to suspending water service. (3) If the person fails to comply with an order issued under subsection (b), the Director may take such steps as he/she deems necessary to prevent or minimize damage to the public water supply or to minimize danger to persons. (4) The Director shall not reinstate suspended services until: (a) The person presents proof, satisfactory to the Director, that the backflow has been eliminated and its cause determined and corrected; (b) The person pays the City for all costs the City incurred in responding to the backflow or threatened backflow; and (c) The person pays the City for all costs the City will incur in reinstating service. (5) A person whose service has been suspended may appeal such enforcement action to the Director, in writing, within ten days of notice of the suspension in accordance with Section of this chapter. (6) A person commits an offense if he reinstates water service to premises suspended pursuant to this Section, without the prior approval of the Director. (7) The City may obtain a lien against the property to recover its response, abatement, and remediation costs pursuant to the procedure set out in Section II of this Chapter. (8) The remedies provided by this Section are in addition to any other remedies set out in this Ordinance. Exercise of this remedy shall not be a bar against, nor a prerequisite for, taking other action against a violator. C. Non -Emergency Termination of Water Supply. (1) The Director may terminate the City -provided water supply of any water user who violates the following conditions: (a) Refusing the Director/Inspector reasonable access to the water user's premises for the purpose of inspection; -21- 6-27 CONVENT RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPERTY LINE COUNTY LINE CONTROL OF ACCESS LINE SURVEY LINE FENCE POWER LINE TELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH RAILROAD BRIDGE OR CULVERT CITY LIMITS STATE OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION m HIGHWAY DIVISION 0 PLANS OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PROJECT SoHo 114 TARRANT COUNTY ACCOUNT NO. 8002-1-68 ROW CSJ = 0353-03-071 FROM: 0.60 MILES SOUTH OF DOVE RD. TO: LOOP 382 CSJ • 0353-03-053 PROJECT LENGTH -3.48 MILES APPROVED FOR AOUISITIDNOF R.O.M.. Ylryu . 7 'gab C.t Lu—PwC.V DISTRICT R.O.W. ENGINEER �RopECT16 S T1dhT NAYS DE��-1 AGQUIRF;� Aar eF � —IlO' IU DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS FINAL APPROVAL. 19 — DISTRICT ENGINEER APPROVED, DIVISION ENGINEER DATE �o X, 22ix � •9,� JAMES J. WEST '` so^'-� z� s LOT 2- SURVEY e• A11581.0.02 BST o 1620 I b� LOT NOTE: TO BE AOUIRED UNDER �x �W 611536�! ACCOUNT NO. 4002-1-03 m�rrrrr';;;;;;;;;;; N6533' FFNo�D � 11586.07.93 NOTE: *f Illllllllr FOR DETAILS OF PAR7 SEE SHEE 3 I .I PROPOSED 12 181.a ROW UNE 2 Q•�o� c� „rl ;nrrrrlr l ,1I U N E Irrr ON rrr,,,rrrrlrlrrlrr;;;;;;;:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;':;; Irrrlrr rrrrrrrrrrlrlllllllrllllrlr Ilrlr III R ,rrrr ,Ir;;;,rl';;;;;;;;�r;;;;;„rrrr I N G T �{ x X I S �3 r E x ,ACCT. 8002 /- 6W ;;Irl%"' ark ' NOTE: I,„Irrr,, ' „ rrllrrrrl r r11 �''�''�'"';;';;;;;;;;;;'%'' 1I1r1rl';;Irlllll;;Il1 ,r,rlllrrlrr,rr + ;llo "Ellrrr 00 g'S3r"%%%""% %%"I' FOR DETAILS OF A / / 6. 0 T o 58 2 rrrr,Irrrrrll.11.rlllrlrllllrlrrrrrrl,rrr S rrrlrr,rrrrrlr ,11 r ,rr'";;;%':%% III;% ' I.a3 6 "+" PARCEL 6 SEE III,,;,, „ ,rrrr,;„rr,r�;;rrllrlll .IIIIIr,IIrIIr,,,,,,,,,rrrrrrrllrr rrrr,rlrlllrlrllrllrrrrrrrr.""r"' rr ,.rrrrrrr;;';;;�;;;;:%%%'r"'' qp 3'..%%"%;;' '� III"';;;' I rrrr,l,IIll,Irllrlr,rrr,,,,,rrrrrrr r,lllll„Irrr, Illlrrrlrrrrrrl ",rrlrrrrrr,rrrrr' SHEET 3 rr1;;,,,,1 z "'; II r,r,I„ ,,rrrr rrrrrrrrr,ll„ IIIrrl,rrlr Irrlrrlrl, ,rrllrrrl,rlllrrr,Illrrrlrll „„„,,,,,,rrrrrrrrrr,,lrllr,,,,rllrllrl'11;;'�r:rllrrlrlr R,2, 2a5;,,,,,,, rrr rll„ rr,l,,,,„ rllrr,rlrl ..............Irrlrrrrllrrl r,r rrrr '"I . ,rllrlrr,lrrr, rrrr ll rlllrl rllllr1111 rr11rl rrrr' „rrr"I';,rrl," T „ ,,,,rrrrrrrr,l,,,I1;;;;rrr""" i lllllr rr,,, rrrlrr,lIlllrrrr , Irllrrrrrrllllrrllllrllrllllrlll Ir'"'r1'r Ill rrr, II,,, rllr,r,lIllrr,r,rl,rrl rrllrrllllllllllrrrrllr rllrlrrrr,Ilrllrlrr rrrrrrlllll ,rlrrrrrrrrrrrlrrllllllllllllllrlll'IIr,'lllllrlll 114 D.0 5 g4' , rrrllrr,r„rr,rlr „rlrrlrllrllrllrl,llrllrl'''Irlrrlrrr "",r"' „Irl1r,1 IIIIII,II "'"'Il ,,rrrr rrrrllrr III r,I r, ""rrrr rll rlrllll1r 111rlllrlllll'r II IIIIr III rI Illlrrrrrrrrrrrrr,llllllllll,IllrIII........IIIIrIIIrIIIII rr.r.rrrrrl „„Irrrrrrrrr"„rrr SN %.> "'. Ik y ''r'rrrlllrr„ "rrrlrrrrrrrrrrrr,rlllrl Irrlrlrll,111,,IIllrr, "rrrr,Ill,Ilrrrllrrlllllr....................... ���rllrrrrr,��IIIrIIrrllllrlllrl,Irlrlllrlllr Ill pOSEO ,rlrlrllr ,I ;;:;;rrrrlrlrrll rr,r,rllrrl,r, lrlrlllllr,rr„Irllllllll, rlr,llrrlrlrrrrrlllrl1r11I,,,,Illlllllrllrlllrrrrrrrrrrrrrlr rrrlllrll,rllrl rrrrrrlllrllllllrlrlrlrl rrrllllrrlrrlrrllr „rrrr;;;;;;;,r;;;;;;;;rrr;;;: I rrr rrr, ,,,rllr,,,,,,r,,,r,rrlrlllllrlllrl,,, rlllrl) rlllrlllllllrr rlrrrrrlrlrrrrrlllrrrrrlrrrrrrrrrr",,, I , " rrrllrrrrrllr lllllr,lrll,rrrrrrrrrrlrr,,,,I„rrllrrrrr,rrllrrll1111,rIrlrlllll rIlll,ll Illlrllr Ilrlllllrllrrrrlllllrlllrllrrlrr Irlrrlrlrlrll';""'"�; Ir ,,';;;,rrrr;;;;,,,,"rrr,, Ir,,,,,,,,Irrrlrrlllrllllrrrlrrrlrll ' Yr Q • � ' „t%"' ""'� r rlrlrlllllllr,,,,,rrrrlIII„Ilrrrllllr r'rrrlrll,lr (t% 5 LUI rr e ',II rnr'nnl'nl""""""""""""""'rrrrllll ,rlllrl nnnnn A"rrnnul rl un "rrnnrrlr'n,,,, 'I,'' nnl, I r, Ilrmlrlr,,, IAAn„ IlrlArrlr, I ,,,, AA;; o,;' ,Inrn ) rrrr" Iln nn Inr I ,,,,,,nAnl rrrr I r nrnnnnun,A Inns A,AA""u;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;nnnn i';;;;;;;;;;;;;;',' A, ' I �,rn";;;;;;;;;;;;; �';;:;%;;;;;; �'n n;' • Al''r I -IfrE r r r� I IW, n 1'r 'rr ",nAl I,✓, r In rn A,ln An 'I✓rin I; n M',..................nr r 9 y nor, I I 2 '"r,.unnn nnr r n ,,,,IAn AAA,AnI n�n, n AAr""r'r", ,,,,,,,,,,, nnn nnnnl"rrlllrinnu u,rrrunn n,Innrrn rll „ „ ,nr , r iI Irrrrrrrr,rrrrrrrlrrllll,llr,rll,Irrrrrrrrr� 'rrr",Irrr U U u U LI•I , IIIAll II1111Ir r ,,, 1111III ' , ,IIr III, 'r„IIr Ir; ,rrrr ,,,,I rr�'r NG;' �r1 rill ' Y u InNI "U1 rJ I' H Il ly;;;l l;l I;;;; l;;;l;;;;:; ;;; ;;;; ;;;;;;;;;I;;I rl •I rl UNDER '"a"'a',';:;;r.;;;;;;lrlrrr LILIL NOTE: TO BE AOU/RED U DE IrhrrrAArI A'rr;rllllArrAA'Irlrrr lr /y�/ III rrAAIAIAAIAAnArrAAIAA yP� ' � • ACCOUNT N0. 4002-/-03 �C ccf. A� J f \ Illlrllr;;;;;... ;;;;;� ;rll.l,rrr; ll1 r I1 r IIr Ir Il rll rlllrl r ,f rl II r I;' II Ir r r ;; ;';;;;;;;;;;;�%;"I'r';;; .';;;;;I,IrIr; IIIIrIrrl r l rr r r1 rrrr,,,rrrrlrrIIIrIrrrrrrr,llr;,,;:rrrllrrllrrrr;,;,rrrr'"'I r rllllrrrrr ;�Illrrrl r r r IrIIIIlrrrrrrrrrrrrrllrrrrrrlllrrrl;Ill ,,rrrrllll r1I ,Irrr rrllrllrlrrllrllIrrr;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; .';;;IIIlrrllllrrrrrrrlllrrr r r Illlrrlrrllrlrrlllll „ ,rrrr,,,Irrr,lrrlrlrrrrllllllrrrrrlrIllrrrrrrrrrr,,,,,,lrrrrrllrrrrrlrrlrrrrrrrlrrrrll,l Irrrrrrr rrrrrlrlrrlrllllrrrlll +;r'Irlllrrrrlrrl;I'1;117,';;;«;;rlrlllrlllrlllllrlllrrrlllr;; UNE a CURVE DATA • 1 07 28 8 T • I.279.21' L • 2.406.92' THOMAS W o HOOD r� SURVEY ABS T T. 706 r ' T •56' 9 R• 51k .D42 SH11410. DGN Sco/e Feet 0 50 100 15( I CONT. ISECT.I JOB I HICNNAT NO.1 P1, 290.57' -o l75 . 28' 33'E 6 a S•3 5 NO,,,, ' FOR PARCEL o N THIS DATA / S EA SE „ SHEETS ,,,,,,,,,, , v N61'59 22 W TING ROW UNE 229.03' 413.24' LARKI N H . CHI V ERS SURVEY 11 89. 3. 3 'x am R T x ALJ S / 0 300 ode -Q C O x� x 27d ± PL �Xl 270.59' iz �rQ 11595.06.05 Q x k N V w J�� �p PROPOSED ROW UNE 261.94' 194. 09' 246.89 565'3d33'E S65 3d33'E ,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , ,,,,, S65 3d3 "�f1P�,,;;;;;; ;,;;; 3'E , ,,r,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,r,,,,,,,, ,,,,,... „rr,r,,,r,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, f „o�;'crv��:or;;;;;;;;;;: , ,,,,,,,,,,, �',, ,r'„r,, ,,,rr„rr,,,,,,rr,,,,,rr„ , iJ,,,,,,,r,r, r, r, r,,,. ii. i.iiii r. i.,.....i.. ;;�„ „r,,,,,,r,,,,,,r,,,,r,r„r,r,,,r,r,,,,,r„r,,,,,,,r c m e, i' ;4 ? N62'07'53'W N62 /d37 W O N6208'S3'W EXISTING ROW 4 259.53' 199.93' jj; ,y �;;,, i sr. r r ra ra ,f' / r I Six 4 ,r ' a, ' a ,,, ' fi ' I,r ii S, , Ja' ' 4:r 'f,r I' '4„i ' fit 'n4 I ,r 1, ' I; ' / s>' ;;,, ' a,r ' f ,r 4 'tI S *, e /r r. ter' 'v r i ,r / �v„ a cs ; s s zoa' srt 3' E' EXIS TING N 7 G OW 0 7 z Q: „ i — LI NE z h — • O — e ,, 6 2'0 S' 8• •S 0' • E O 9 277.73' 11595 59.86 O40 n ROL S CONT OF ACCES / `/ / %✓✓;'';:�;;:;:;;S:;S• :;: ;, z ;y „ r ,; %;; / " ...../E/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, _ 2 OP , R �LINE ' 3' 062E 46' / ,, •tee ,.02-04'10' CURE DATA 650.22' / y�� ;';%r %' 207.68' 3 PI. 1577.46.08 / / OS / EE 1 ET INSET 0.48'07'28 /� T • 1. 279. 21' / / / • W L • 2. 406. 22' R•5.749.58 (ZI 5g 1i 81.9d RX a� / TT I NE ,;,,� /'li �� '� �� SIC • N . / �.� ' a �� B ADD / 06 327.02 � / R S + 1 /595.05. 5 �,t H N E THOMAS M • HOOD SURVEY 8T 1 ao , A / / N 5Q • �1`hA / Scole �'' Feel AS l . 706 596 66 h / U 0/ 50 too 150 P / EED. RO STATE AID PROJECT N0. SNEET Di V. Np. N 361.06, ',y\\ / \ 9� / STATE DiST. COUNT. 1 1591.73. 78 \ TEXAS IFTW TARRANT / / / CONT, SECT, JOB N�CNM. N0. _ SHll4/I.DGN 0353 03 1 053 1 SHi ,a LARKI N H ° CHI V ERS SURVEY co ABS T 300 ° J5, c'� 1 F z O //5' CONTROL OF ACCESS 866.31, vNi R-7.659. 44' c� 11608 44.l4' 0 OS'S8'49' A CP 9• r ,,,,,,dlow S65'3a33 E ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,,,,;;;;;,,, l3/.06' 115' 2.96' .659.44 x _ / Z 08. l9 �% �- �;, :, NOTE: 0 E: , ,,,,,,,,,,,,, w N FOR DETAILS ON = ; tip PARCEL l0 SEE SHEET 3 ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, I' �D N �� i x 2 O vTl :9;, N6r12'37-W s� o� ,M bey 44' 35 5 .3 B' 0- 0 r 3 9' 3 a x A — — - �, i ', N ;; i K- ;;'; l";;;;; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,. s',;;;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, V„ ;i;;;;;;;;;;;;,,,,, , „ „ N 6 r� a 3 "4; C5„': /', 5 5 2 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 6' ' ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :: ,,, w�;;;:::::,,;,;:..................... PROPOSED SH114 R 6! "" ;;4Yh'%vti sa' 702.7r — S`o� ` � � � �� s6ro9'oe•E 1 „''', "i„ ,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, 624.61' N7f08'13'W �— /298.62' / / p•02.58'33' / R-5.749.58' 1 -mm" MMMEMEM m9n a' - M �wm ONO on .,r J b CU 8 39' ss�----„ E ;% 50' wk D CONTROL OF ACCESSI 3 0 5 %S 66' 3' •4 56 R , f Z)J. bT x prt0-727'4/-0 x 1 1x j CURVE DATA I 1 PI - 1616.27.94 s - 17'44'20' P T • I,192.13' x L 2, 365.19' \ \---- G L tRAGt 3 61x x • �P h x GO; e OO \ x X SC�,-x .t '� 0 5o too 150 E ED.RO OI V. NO. STATE AID PROJECT N0. SNCET N 6 4 5TATE DIST. COUNTY TEXAS FTW TARRANT SHI14/2.DGN CONT, 5ECT. JOD NiONRAY NO. 0353 03 053 SHil4 LARKIN He CHIVERS 411.; SURVEY ABST e 500 / 298 224.95' 1 1612.94.25 Ln 3I �I N a "V"Z1 02.39"30' n 355. 38' * R-7.659.44' > J z o m A �, CONTROL OF ACC SS I \ 41 W LoI \\ 0-04'04'29' 544.70' PROPOSED ROW LINE R-7.659.44' Q 6` c�3s 6��j ,,,, ,.n,,,,,,, ... ,,,-,„ ii l ;44; 7 7 9. Nb 5 174.79 Ae /-7 CHIV L P) SURV D ABS T T. 2—c r2 6 R 7 74 0 03'IODO ; ,,,;"..... tigTaNG" PROPOSED I C SH u4 Y128 30 ---- fM1�;,, �„ �i -o r ,!�, 04'•g'O3• 552, 65' R-7. 659.44' N�.........„, { rnT ;;4; %b% , „� • x ,:r ,,,, r 37 ;' 555.91' „V„ S ;.. . ................ fol e /,' AlVTftoL, -ADL 6 R 7 529.44, ` I„ 310.53' EXISTING RNE346.63%�r•i FE 6/O. B9 211.75' i, ROW UNE �;;; ;, ;,' 753.61, PROPOSED N N6035'2/'W " ="i p 09'27 41' loq �o PO(µ l"•.. / i R•4.563.66' 4 ea ;�� ;; V \ J 203.46' + \ \ I 11614.75.12 I \ n \ CURE DATA \ _ I Scale `� Feet n _ 17'44'20' + \ L - 2,36513q \\ 0 60 100 150 e ``� `�^\\ `� \ OiV. N0. STnTE yip PROJECT N0. SNEE N G V STATE Oi ST. COUNTI ��,w x/ +\ �`� `� �`� + •\ s TEXAS ST T TARRANT CONT. SECT. JOB wCN11AY N0. /J SRII4/3.DGN 0353 1 03 1 053 1 SN114 552.65' ,\ FOR DETAILS OF S EEPARCETL51, SEE A • H o CH/V ERS SURVEY ms ♦x 0 Q rd / 23.61. 3.61.15 j s9 n R•7, 659.44' Q •OP06'40• S5P03'14'E 148.53' 138.41' ABST o 299 \�x x/ 11630.17.89 s iE w `e S5P03'l4'E 380.61' �� ., „� ;,X;; .... .......... .. ,,,..... -7 74 44' R 9. -04 06'37'' ' ,,, 9Y ....... ;;;;;;,; ; Q•0204'3P .,, 555 ,,, �Ibi h h d T 3 0 Q• 0/'0 ' 3 26' 0� Og ,,,nn, , „ nu '• N 6 ,,,nnm ', ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;7, „„. T Fo1 c♦e _._ V ' ♦ 00 �♦ I 1 + ..................... ii .............,,,, , Jae ♦ -J I CURVE DATA \ I PI • 1616.27.94 I 1 Q - 48'4420' T • 1.192.13' I I L • 2, 365.19' \ �J O ll 238.34' S5rO3'14'E �s-n,—rrrm„ 3Ah1 29h q s� tic 0 a�gA�65 237.43' �9 ' 11633.62.95 5 1.547.73' S5/'03'14'E ,,,, • ;' 2/ 00. 04' irl, ii�� ryry ;; ' „► ,, ;' 1i�' r,,,;;; ;;,,,, ... 1- ;; P n, h n ................ 'n„""""""""'n,nnn,,, n, n;;,un........ mn;in;;Hilo;;; „u 14, 1 ♦ CONTROL OF ACCESS rG ;i i; r„ ;;r; ;;;; e� ,nn,uHu,........... H,,, unu,,... u„nnm,nu,nuu,nnn,nn EXISTING ROW LINE �+ W M o W o HALL SURVEY \ + Scale �` Feet ABSTo 695 50 f°° 150 \ \ TED. RD DSTATE AID vgOJE[7 N0. SNEEt IV. NO + + 6 SH11414.OGN 6 \ \ STATE DIST. COUNTY \ \ + TEXAS FTW TARRANT \ \ CONY. SECT. JOB NI ONFAY NO. ♦ 0353 -- 1 053 SH114 C�,RROL 114 6LK. A SOT I S5rO3'14'E 1,245.25' 833' PROPOSED RON LINE .....................................I I 378 . I ................................................................I "W"'—, � I , , I , " I'll .......... ....................... ............... I I I ........ ... . , " 11 11 1, ""'. "I".. W, .............. I I. ............... :." Ill.— I , ,, ....... .......... ................... .............. I ........... ......................... 11 .... ........ I ... ............ ......... I I ............. .................. ................. ....... I. .... ....... ............. ....... "I ..... .......... ........... ............. ........... I ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ........... ... .... .......................... ..... ...................... -------------------------- ............... ..................... ....... I. 7m ........ .............. 1"", .............. I ....... I ...... . , "I ". ". ". ". ". , '.1 ................ .......... ........ ........... IIIII'm ............. ........................... ....... ................ ................ .............. ...................nS gnu ............... . .. ............ ............ ........... ..............Ln ................. .. ....... . ...................... .......... ......... ...... ......................... 4 1 ................. .................... ............ ....... PROPOSE& . ................................... I ..... .. I .... I. ... .................... .................................................1 11 1 —11VI .................................. o ...................................................... ................................................................. I .......... ....... . ...................... 04 — I N48*14'09'W ................... ...... I .. .................... ............... ................... .............. ..... ..................... ............... ....... ZI luu . ..................... ............................................. .......................... ......... . .... ......... ....... 16 'll'o ......... .......... .......... byrf .. ........ ................ 1.1.111.1.1, ............... ............... ........ ............ ......... ..........................................I ................ ......... ...................... ................ utt LLLLLLLLLLLLLLw! CLE (,th ................. ................... ..........................................I LL""Lj ........... ............. ............. Tol e° .. I. ..... I .............. ............ ................. ............... ............... .....................................................I ............... ........................ .......... ............... F,77 ....... ............. .................. .............. rh ................... .. . .................................. ....... ... ....... 924' 636.37' 2,010.50' S461170-E NOTE.- no/ to scale 26 �,� ga6h2 d 119 im 125.00, M4F1r1OW .......... .................... I'll .......... ............. ............ .......... ............. ............. I. .......... .......... 4 ............... . ....... I I I I ........ I III ......... .. ...... .............. I ........... I ....... q� v "" ... ............ ............... yll .. .. ............ ............... ....... .... #,= I I I I , , I , I I , I I I , , , I , I I I I " ............... ........... I ... ........... I ......... ....... ... Ill I ..... ......... I ..... ............ EXISTING ROW LINE 614.50' 1 . ..... /. 249. /3' WY - W. HALL SURVEY ABS T. 695 1#70 9 Scale " Feel ONLY 0 50 100 150 ig r ED: RDI v 'o STATE A. D PROJECT NO. 6 1 STATE Di ST. COONTY TEXAS F TW TARRANT — CONT. SECT. Joe I a -Al SW415. dgn 0353 03 1 053 SMI I 04KS A��N . P FIRST \1i LOT 10 ARRCI` '''q �� oa 114 & CSag LOT `c $ To n �- 2 1.245.25' S5f03'14'E 833' ,;"'p P 77" n"CP „rn n, „n CONTROL OF ACCESS 25 P \box, LOT IS \x / ti LOT 19 x LOT 3 LOT 15� ✓\58" EG00 / LOT 16P43-_32' 1 "�..l1................. ,,171„ 1 � 268.5 7 ;;,r';;;; l655 5 7 .58 n�^n I'll 151 LOT.. r-aomomoo�::raac q CURVE DATA PI.1659.96.28 Q • 04.44'35• T - 1. 279. 21' L 2.406.22' W so F`�� I 1I657.70.19 9 QIto d}y =1 R-5.749.58 162.09 PROPOSED ROW UNE �•02.49'36- •0/36'S5' 283.65' s7 R- 5 ' 99 s >" _ .......... ;•,, -. ,iiii,. I / DDN. 3 \9 F Ws p FILING LOT 1fag � . -SEGGN f 1 1 , lST,1N0','f 2gGl;'; , UNN " X ;,�K�9Y9A9W';, I'll�„ rrh 1 / r ; r;;; ' 1 r. .., J, ,.l.,J,J W M . W . HALL SURVEY a so-1 ;; , ! , , ,nn,.uuunnm,nn........... .�;��, .n,,,,,.n.,.nnnnn,n,.,nn,n,u.,nn,n..n......................u,n,n,nm,nn,n,nn.nnnm,nr„u nii �u,.n„unnuu,nn,,,nun .................. urn nn,n„,,.0 �i�ri;in n..'��i; ',.u„in,r ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , •! ,,', rr rr , , 1 , • 1 • 1 1 !, 1 ,1 r, 1 , 4r rr ,ir N , • 1 4 am 1 1 1 1 .rr / r u,nunn..n,n,u,, ,.,,n n,nnunnn nn,uu,....n,. u.nnnnnn.urnnnn,.un,unnnn„,,r,nnru .u.,unn. .uu,un,n I nn' . r ,n n,.un, „ , nnn ,. 573.7/ < t •r e ABST • 695 4n , ,."'•...... ........ CONTROL OFACE...... , ,, ............................. nn.,...n,nrn,,,, nn,unn.,,n,un,mn,.n,,,,,.,,., mnnn,n,nnun„'..''%' .n .............................................,.n,u.nn,,, n,.iii,iun,nnun,n ;,;;,/,,,,,,,...,,,s v H4 �,,d,,, nn,u", Hu , , nnmm�n,u, unu, ,n . .unnu nu noun uu.nn, n,nnnnn„nnn.,n..nnr„n„unu,un„nun,m q��,, ��.. , nnnu,un.nnunn,,,,,,,rn.nnn ,.uum { „nnu u.unuu AR"......... ., !J Wi.nn iiii S,u n„u,nnu..,,,,,,,.,,nn,,..,,,,,n,urwunn.nn. n., nnn, , ,, r.,,n,i, n 3,nnn,n,n.n,n, 472' EXISTING ROW LINE 276. 89' S487074-E I.324.13' 26 � s ONLY ACCESS ONLY + aeO`�4 325.49' ,(/ 11655.67. l7 �Q CARROLL OAKS °�e� 4 p x o ADDN. TO, c�c BLK. I \ d + LOT I } } yes o ` e,�o �6, e ZA3\g a9 RI CHARD EADS)� SURV EY ABS T T. 481 n,nn ;; 1 /. //7.54' 9- • � 32 PART I s oipsQ \ 6/4.23' sh'/4/6. Scale Feet 0 50 100 150 SHEET OF SHEETS FED. RD Alp PROJECT NO. SNEET O 1 V. NO. 6 8 STATE Di ST. COUNTY TEXAS TARRANT CONT. SECT. JOB HIGHWAY NO. 0353 03 1 053 SH114 PROPOSED ROW UNE RI CHARD EADS SURVEY ABS T T. 481 t S43'50'25-E .a A8 2sa S� ;,;,irr;;r;;;;;'; ;;;;:';;;'r;r;'r;;r ;;, ';, ";;, K .el .......................... nnnni,mnnr,r 1, ...... ,,,,,,,,,,,'..rr...,,r.....,..,.......r.................,............. ,,,m..,,,.,nr..,,.nn..,,r,.,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,.,n,,.,.,„ur,,,rn„,,,.,,..,.,.,,n r, "{.............................r..r u� . n� nnn. n, •' q u, n.unnrunnu,r.,nuuu. ,,. 673.24' S44'03'37-E 3 'rl ---------- - n. ';,,,, r= L: I' IG: L' ', „� �`�+�t ': ;,Y '' I I - ;,. --� :5 12 ;;� N48 „� ,,,,,,,, „„ Mll .rp', .Yl,$ iINA;;A ;, Is' �„ u;, ;;r;. 106 ............... I 8. '% � n,nun""' u„nunnnn,mn,nuu,nrnnnnn,unu.n '-- ""':::---"• "-----"". "1,. „!n n rt)r u foJ \rn v CONTROL OF ACCESS a` -A ,, 0 w — R 5.839. 1770.9a S 48' 4 'E u ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Oa /7/. 35 ;. 72 190.60' PROPOSE ROW S 33.4Y 217.45' 29.Oa 9�g� Ng8'07'07tiV LINE 35 S48'1a59'E 32 "�2S /S w 50 N4T55'53•W AO 3 EXISTING ROW LINE--" + PART 2 x O i hh0 2 50.00' 0� N47'55'53 ?y TRACT 2 t7d 5 260.IY x �� y 1I669.27.74 x o + Scole Feet (C+\\ OF 6No 6O 100 150 • STATE AID {}JECT N0. SHEET V * + J STAi iST. COUNTY FTW ANT \+\ \+ TEXAS SEC . JOB TARR„IGHWAY NO. SH11417.DGN 0353 03 053 I SH114 PROPOSED ROW UNE S44'03'37'E RICHARD EADS SURVEY ABS T o 481Ul s22 63g 25/Ig'E 2S��Sc 503.89" 15662'06 K - - - - - ' ' ' S483330E - U u - - Q nn .,� a a.<u J nK JJ ,' 7'7/,nn nnnn r, r,n - ,r,r - n nn - n r/ r. Tn n _ - n _ ppnTT�� n n "*uJu n - - r m r, / u, %/.. �II THOMASl MAHAN SURVEY ABST o 1049 11682.63.03 S47'25'31'E 190.94' 10 tStl.o� S54 54'59 E .nun I \�e�a e "u e "UL "✓ 71' 1 " 147.10 ✓✓✓•,1,J✓✓L I „a u aa% ✓L%UU n p 4Y ✓ ✓L.L - "✓ nU L.L l ,, _ "U - 5 - •5. 1/1 J „Luau,' / uuuuuuuu, --pr„^^"•.��- R P 14 0 OS, H I ED✓ J S - _ __ ,11,n^�-_ -nn..,,,,, _______ "U<U ,'%,'%.nn ^^ „uun/n,u,-,,,,,u,n,-.....,. nn,unu,„n,un,,,,/,,,,,n,,,,,,/,nn,nnn„ nn nr -- - ,T n�%, nnnT„r '%%%%%;a%%a%%aa,' ,,, ....., ., ..., � �����, �^ - -- - nnr - nn --rr,r,r - , r, I/ryI „ „ u 1, p��yV!/ „aI <uuu V uuu�a' -- uL/ "u ✓J'ul ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, „ U "a✓1,</ ' '/'U U ''Il U IIa%,I "a UL ;;8 I N E /3 N G ROW 9. I 35 O TING 8' T 5 XIS X I E - - - 17.223Z --r,7nnnnr. - 1,770.90 ---- - - - -- - ....... n nun/., .../n. "u"u c Nr ACCESS 8___ u. u.n0 . 8 4' 53 -a .aua.ana. n'.nn.nuu.0 nnn.u.uu.uuuujn ui.%. , , n.u,un............................................R ...Tn.Jur...............✓....... (.......................3 4h LJ 2 ' 054.4 aaa„L�� ✓✓u<,n:au,✓ asa ,✓ R•5.308.84' N55 u r 198.6- 60' 07 W PROPOSED ROW UNE 419.72' �, N48'33'24'W ee 5 394 50 5 9 59- z p•04'l5'28' W 4'3q�' v 50.09 ooWq � }� L„� bl 5r3 "c 35 Li 50. N550437 W +\ TRACT 2 _S57-26, 06•E 772.05' 53� Scale `- Feet 0 50 f00 160 SH11418. DGN +� T o \ MAHAN SURVEY E 2=PQo,BREWER INDUSTRIAL ADDN. \ /x ABST o 1049 Nag5o. 242.50 1 /700.38.34 x 1 /62/•55.7/ 230.77' 11697.95.04 LOT l LOT 2 199.88' 1 x 11692.65.60 11695.49.74 36 z N ART 2 x �Q Q Poi K�r`9 C� PoE 0p Wcq 5�qn tS - S63'46'l2'E 601.71' PROPOSED ROW UNE x-max , C� ;;i. ✓�•'" PT.10 x R-5,619.58' _ p-09'35'36" 940.91' PJUSr1lLCt._R-QW _.UNfT . �nr:',:i sJ' - „r" s, 1_-- qa;; >a, -------------- 3 --- 8 ---- .5. %'R •o 49 0 ;k �%;; ;p 2 3' b„ 3 8 9. %'a;' 3 9:;38' ,Fj; ';B3 SsS S;; r ;; 17 812.09 SH 11 ... ;i �; p • T58'05' 0 ;i' �i {� {{ �l J. „Y, , 4/ O �P,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ry� �$ 38 � N8g56 g 2/9.7z I LOT 5 � 11699 44 2/0.28' Harr a m 1 /69/ 8I.06 W W i, 229.49' I I ZN p 0226'2/' 2Z.56, W -4 R-3,390.52- 11689.60.96 U) 1 j6 60�d I I la A/C i II 7 1 /689.39. /0 II II II RI CHARD EADS SURVEY Il ABST e 481 . .,,,,,,,............... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,......, W o ,,,,,,,,, . ,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ... R-5.390.5z .... ,,,,, ........ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,,;, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, 7....... .,,, I, ' 427. 9.81,39 N54• i p•0/'20'05' �d09 N 2 PL = 51.E PROPOSED RON LINE 138.3451 N7g5Z R•5390.5z 125.8/' 5/. 8,54'21^N 381.87' Z C N 99. W 2807 24.2/' 86.46' p-00'l5'25'N59'5922'W p-0407'I8 42 R-5,308.5z kq 14 0 I R-5,400.52 w 1m 6'W N 2I CURVE DATA PI. 1693.40.82 p - 41'03'27' T • 1838.98' c� R • 4, 911. 07' \w L • 3,519.22' s LOT 4 VILLAGE CENTER PHASE 2 8LK. 2 Ll 541 Nam°" �Q Im E„ m�� Scale `gin Feet k 0 50 100 150 �\ ti G /NOT' FOR DETAILS \� \aEL �� OF PARCEL 43 SEE SHEET 12 hh , sN/4/9. U.NU STATE AID PFDJECT NO. I'NO V. NO. 6 STATE DIST. COUNTv TEXAS FTW TARRANT CONT. SEC7.1 J09 NiCNMAV NO; 0353 03 1 053 ! SH114 D INSET R� SRW�� 281.Sa E51, B�K T 11708.76.69 A LO 281.57' ? w 0 11708.69.09 m 586.15'30 E 586'15'3aE 144.35' 41.60, PROPOSED 0 o RON LINE 6658544'47'E ° 7.24 44 39.77, PL p900156 29' 40.OS' p.00.24'31' N-� .619.58' cut, rt Povea Po"`;nq 11 cut pave PorKln9 er eG48 (4 u o cuIvert o x BRIARW ��' D k T. P ASIl `IZ LOT A ll C� er -- 11 I g�llboaro 1 LP 1`J/ It ' s+qns p-02.Oa42' ; OE LINE LOT A PG. 7 /x VOL. 386 09 b� ` 0 x �ti Off. ;T LINE• • b� 1460 Ln tio�b 9 Li h 58 a E to Lit cc 61.07 �g�(3 3 14.37' 39. 4 58 2' 6' p•or21'9 R•5.619.58' f) In1e of z N T e MAHAN 1710-35.49 ABS/. 50 �,jO.4. SURVEY 1049 10.53.99 ------- Z INE iXISTING ROW L413.14' 60 "a ;tit"; 1' 5 7 9. 9 o � tr z R 5. ;, s= ,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ;Q 0 3 37 16' ....Sz ....... ,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ;f1p0�!;1tflE446.48 ;" ,;;;;;;;=;;;;;;;;;;;; „ a O .� ...... ,9 x/ „.ti 0 4 T 6 �" ,,,,,,,,, ,,, , .........,,,, FOR ZY, i J{ ... , ...........,,,,,,,,,,, F ,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, PA RCEL 4/• SE ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ......,, SHEET 11 .. T� Si iv LOT 2 ,, LOT 4 m -p��.;------------- 9 S S �zs ; F ;; ;:, 424.33' O Q 0430'37 _ PROPOSED Rat U"E R 5.308.84' R•5.390.52 /27 _ 2 _ p•05 4a09 LOT 3 I2 N6g2P 5 w wj N7,T •W , 52. 04' S87'3,- 3 'W 525. 28' 220.29 n2 Z- 80. O N79'44'16'W Vi 1/69995.06 Irn b�;� LnP FARRAR ADDN. v 2 b 80.00' N BLK. l v VILLAGE CENTER "79'1546 BILK. l CURE DATA 255.38' r 11706.39. 95' P1 • 1693.40.82 , • 4r03'27- T • 1.838.96, R - 4.911.07' Scale Feel L 3,519.221 o 0 50 100 150 stV1420. dgn P� t T • MAHAN SURVEY ABS T • 1049 4'3g 2 34.41E' IDENTICAL POINTS N8 4 S • FREEMAN SURVEY o 5.36' ABS T • 525 59`" � 1 /715.67.62 1 LJ x /79'± = — • 602.43' TFP x��—_- x��x� N 2 11716.70.24 Z-1 — x—��x-- X � a a $ „max —•�— ' N J x "TppR Q -4 PoveO Parking o51gn02 LP Q 46 / TFP 41 PART 2 Z w � � \ � � I / / +I Z ^ LP N PART 1Jp,\ Poveo PorKlnq A v3s N Povea ParKinq 5�6$� ; k ° 5 S" EXISTING ROW LINE I FP 4/3. /4 • ' f.CP-,'' ' • • — S I qn 51 qn N86 l7" 3l W564.11' N86'28 45'W s TL x� -_--- ,,-i,,,>r' - S , t. t- .Q i = LvRT %.6S P' 96 .............. . TL Inlet ...... ni PP 4 TL N-IB � P I 486 '� :1 La T 4 ,5,. 5 . 99 - 7 _._ =586 ..... 44 i A 0940 Ez 23 S86' 9' 44• 2 E= r9 �x 53v, ;p =� "3f1 " 9- =s� 9 r F , S S =�•03' r- a s• V =R- - .2 5 6/ 9 .5 6 ° 8' - ty , I I 0= V " L4 [: 7J . nl J/. ':£ r' o ,. �J n 03 E �1 f Y r : tea' ' !f/ 1 f fJ ' BALL11709 ADDN. pa TFP PI K- l v Q p ..��: ......................... ........, .... .... ...... ;, - ,. Q - `--- - -. lT O- tR; :�' '.�,•ii ' ;Q 0= V /Y ;,, ,;,;; rn PROPOSED ROW LINE ` 156.07' 588 49 0 1-y N 8 4907 V / N8T27'4 8W R 5.308.84' 260.03' 5 N87 3P18'W PL 305.91'22.85' 200.00 525.28 N8T27'48W 0 o54ao9 y >> y�� a D E ISTING R°`" `'"E 4 �o 9. �� W . E. MAYFIELD/S SUBD. I 'Al �, l TRACT 2. Scale Feet KIIVBALL11709 ADDN• Slob /723.4 .44 o so 100 150 L„ FARRAR ADDN . = 284.6Z LOT 1 222.37' SCALE, I = BLK. l 287.25' 11717.39.07 1 1722.35.86 a N SHEET Of SHEETS LOT 2 11715.95.15 \ • DED NO A10 PROJECT N0. SNEEi l3 � J • STATE DIST, COUNTY roTRACT l TEXAS TARRANT lT /� CON i, SE Ci. JOB H"' ..Y N0. sM1421.dgn 0353 1 03 1 053 SHil4 -x I I -�� x x a Paved PorkIng S. FREEMAN SURVEY L Z! TF > ABS T. 525 L 236.94' 11735-47.97\ C PorKing sign s 4 Ilgn i !p...... sign sign 218.27' S8225'11-E /_3S . ...... EXISTING ROW LINE 9.06' ................... S8244'49-E .. . ....... .. ........ .. ........ 396.91' .......... ..... ...... .......... ............... ............ .......... ............. ........... 85' ...... .... ..,........%::::: ......... .............. ...... ................... 0 '58 .......... ......... - ........... .............. ........... . ..... ................. ...................... ' inlet . ......................... ............ ......................................................... .................................. ............................ :� ........... .. ......... 6-- . ........................................................ .... R-5 96-'.5,3 �O ..................... ............ ................. jj 9 ..... ........................................ .... ... ..... ........................................ .......... ............................................. - -------------------------------------------- NA0-9-E 095' " I o _I I - U x CA x -L.- / / o ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I F7p/ ............. ............... ..... ............. —__Rlpr —p— v moral) cal — — — ------------ ..... .................. .................. .............. ................ ..... ....................... ----------- ....... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... ....... ............... R- ........ .... .. ........... ............ ............ .... ........... W7 ................ ............ . .. .......................... ................. ........ .. .. .......................... ........................... .... ............... ............. ... ............ . ... ......................................... ........... ............... ..... ................. ......... ......... e,�,; ................ ........... .................................................. ...... .................. ........ .. ................ ........ ............. .............. ...... ..... ......................... ............... ....... ... ................................................. ..................................................... .............. ......... ..... ....... ......... ... ......... "Il""Ill""Illll""Ill,I ......... .................O ...... ........... . ............ ..... ...... ... . .............. .............. .......... —, ............... ... ...... . . ....... . ................. ............................. .. ............. ..... ........ ..... ..... ...... .. ................. ........... ....................... ......... ..... ....... ...... ............. 6 ........... ..................... ............ ....... ..... . .......... ... . ........ ...... ..... ..... ............. .. .. ....... .............. ... ............ .......... ............. ............. .... . .... .... ............ ... of .... ....... ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L4 cn o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ln 120' PROPOSED ROW UNE--o" 528.1E 134.98' NB?"27'46W 66, 122. 65- 200-00' 86-09"TW �27!;I,*w r71.63' 1180*49F7-W S87"27'48W 5 N84*4,'-j4*W 586-36'47W TRACT 2 196.19' W. E. MAYFIELDIS SUED. 11733-49.99 —Z TRACT 4 W.E. IVAYFIELDIS SUBD. Sale Feet 0 50 TRACT I OE v. NO. S,A,E D PROJECT -0. 6 1 STATE I DISC. 1 COUNTY shI1422. S o FREEMAN SURVEY, _ _ , T HOMAS EAS T ER SURVEY 451'+ PL— ABS T o 525 ,N ' \ \ ABS T o 458 —N$E—T 2 386'+ / / r 58g25' 4� \ 1 /1I +\ 1 Q\R�•/\� s•s3.��-r2`- S'7_3'/Si - orEn c`sas a ; /17436.�6\4r2.�26�4 �°v°oIp1 ID '320.64' o9i l•1.IOS6 .' 74' Vl- (Z;1745 24.05 j PL119.73ch S793a00•E SBT� 623.�E N37 PL INSET I h 38.60 `' -ID 6 W S78'2l9'E ? ©/ Tb,59'E v) .d6/4 58a290'E�o PART I 19.3 Ln 4 PART 2 � Q 53 25•42 11908PL E /\ I INSET 2 2L o (0 NE 2 40 9 EI 573 33'/2 E 80.14' S7a58'OrE a 120.88 200. 95 253.85' S64.08'16'E 29.98 //0.74' 3 S7B 35'/9 E 174. 07' N79 3a0' 292. 93' S8g 36, 3g E 230• pr I I $ b N S76 29 l8 E / N . ,,5�- ,,,,,,,,, 1 — h o 0 7 2i x En Q „ o d W l _ I t F P T' 2078'' •E m N m '14 O T �n . B. 2.63.40 � J' v En _ 6'. 1;.�' — W 9 9 O �i O N O IptD o moo_ N73 s6^sj , a�DroD UNE 248.89'� SPFi "„ ° • N76"46'54•W �y _ rn _ S� 8:g1' 199.51' • N749 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..... W; 6'W - ;• ----- 7 i 44'O7, / /-�-- 77 >r oD , y/• $• , 8 ;N ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - - N i 40 4' --� ; rW N 4 ;8; 9, 1 m 0 f; , 5 ,, �yj�� 3 'sG1ts?,zs� 7 M A 4 4 ,p �N 8 SH /l4 "' -Ly 'tL ;GJte`n 1 'S r„ r :^'i' ;z fo _J PP Tni t nn co In et EXISTING ROW UNE \ ..Ak. 46 f ;S7 � T _t 5 3 .3 4 9' 4' 8' E; zx jss S7 a• 0 4' 3 / �v' 2 �r e E "%�1' 5' %k� —— �s �ais �'e 'r o iT T lT ' 2• 5 WWI' �� �5 3 .2 4 �"s� I 1 � ---- 57404' PROPOSED R LINE 48.4 25'E A ob 50.N76 29 42 WWl93 55' /N7926'59W 130.Oa151.65' N8N x o ;�.... N8141'04 ' ; C / N �\ / \ N76 P9 42•W 215. 76' � o A. �— \ N LOT l 1 /746 /8. 57 x C EXISTING ROW UNE ��� Z W -A lJ� x m I 209. 48' I z `s LA _ TRACT 4 y I / 1 /740.24. 0/ ' ,r \ LOT 2 X 5 TRAC w x Z * LOT 3 1 D lzi �� I F 1 x cale `� x eix • E \ �Ar x� ti` N74IB'35tiY /l 322.55' PC OA KNOL S x 0 0 f00 150 W . E. MAYF�LD'S5 _ LAK VIEW _ ���x rEO. D SNEET SUBD . p, y, p STATE AID PROJECT N0. N ry `x IS \ 'LIL x 5 eiE OiST. COUNTY I GOO' q � x T XAS FTW TARRANT 1 I I ONi, SECT, JOB Ni ONMAY NO. sh142.5.dgn }53 03 053 SHII4 S7UrE 107.5 S92E SS66230.0274' '2235 56749 ; r'. f i '' „ .. hy -. N p19''go 6 N3�M 53'I f / .5 n� .v . ®r im D THOMAS EASTER SURVEY ",.k QRST0 458 S61*57'54'E PROPOSED `4P 204.65' ROW UNE 52 p1" Z0.or..'27'JJ EXISTING F? U d S 114L B 3g2) '14,k0 I.I n °` - ---- �2 7 1w 2 m,l ND OF PROJECT ...........:.....",,,, _ ,;,;;;,,,,,, STA./760+00 fete -� J^ !n , u ^' y/"n:, .., "t ^ T' ..1 �" n 14 /`H` mT -- __ -_ ---- - "cu m7 'S PQ i' S . b; s:' t -s e s O., r O 0 i J S G \ \ O a a. srt 6 0 c v� e �O\ — �-�,,..<e Cr ( t f���� e c C. t ......... °� e� t 83.08' t EXISTING R _ � I \ 0J c,Y• rD m o>� LOT 19 \ UT- N rn CID ' O o �F? / A CTj LoT 20 N�gi I I BLK ° ,tF 305.50' � 11755.18.38 Scole Feet 0 50 100 150 E EO. RD STATE AID PROJECT NO. SHCC 01 V. NO N 6 l6 �\ STATE DIST, COUNTY l TEXAS FTW TARRANT \ J C°NT. SECT. JOB Ni CHYAY NO. SH11424.DGIV 0353 1 03 1 053 SRi14 b P b 43Y 2.54r u) 13r I.2B4' 266' b 575' o x /75' T 67r g 5�g 1.04Z N it) TR. TR. Z CHNERS AODN. ITR, 3 43r ~ ti 1.50r � � ♦ 223' 70r P 248' 234' 226' 300, ro h �i 1.036, ♦ l 30r 1.623' 7 N'1 h 425' ♦ 1, 637' I N P b l00T 597' 442' 755' • � HOTf: NOT TO SCALE AND ♦ DISTANCES ARE ± 40a EEO. ND SHEET N�r DIVNO. 6. /7 N STATE DIST. COUNTY ni TEXAS FW TARRANT CONT. SECT. JOB wILNFAY NO. l.3la 1141YP. DGN 0353 03 053 SH 114