The URL can be used to link to this page

1998-02-03 CC Packet City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting February 3, 1998 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Resolution No. 98-7. Calling for a General Election to be held on May 2. 1998: etc. Your packet contains the resolution which details the operations of conducting the general election in May. Note that we will conduct early voting from April 15 to April 28 at the Administrative Offices and the general election on May 2 (Ir will be held at Johnson Elementary, both in conjunction with CISD. If you have any questions about the election, please contact City Secretary Sandy LeGrand. 2. Agenda Item No. 5B. Authorize the City Manager to extend the lease with Bootstrap Investments for Administrative Office Space. You may be aware that when we first entered into a lease agreement with Telesupport for the office space at 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard, the initial term was for two years, with two (2) one-year options to extend the lease. We have now reached the end of the initial two-year term, and need to exercise our option to extend the lease another year. Bootstrap Investments (formerly Telesupport), has agreed to extend the lease. The initial lease provided for rental fees of $13.50 per square foot for the first year, and $14.50 for the second year. The lease also specified a rental fee of $15.00 per square foot for the first year extension. The extension agreement on the agenda will set the fees for the second one- year option at $15.00/s.f., or no increase in rental fees. We have been satisfied with our lease and feel this extension is appropriate. We will need the space at least for 12 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 Page 2 additional months, perhaps up to two years depending upon the construction schedule of the new town hall. 3. Agenda Item No.5C. Authorization to advertise for bids for the construction of Mirou Elevated Water Tower. This proposed tank is necessary to improve water pressure and fire flow in the southeast portion of the city. The project was originally estimated to cost $1,560,000.00, however with the inclusion of several additional components, the current estimated cost is $1,710,000.00. These additional components include associated modifications to the tanks at Bicentennial Park and E. Dove St., a precast fence to surround the site, and the option for a second floor in the tank shaft. The memo from Bob Whitehead discusses each of these components in more detail. The engineering and construction costs will be divided equally between the FY 97-98 and FY 98-99 budgets, amounting to $855,000.00 each year. Please contact Bob Whitehead if you have any questions regarding this item. 4. Agenda Item No. 5D. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Dunaway and Associates for the design of street improvements for Burney Lane and Love Henry Court. These two projects are part of the schedule of capital improvements funded for FY 97-98. The contract provides for the design, engineering and surveying for the project and will cost $24,280.00. Contact Bob Whitehead if you have any questions regarding this item. 5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Carter and Burgess for a Geodetic Control Network. You will note in the memo from Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead that we are ready to begin the surface monumentation project included in the budget (Object Code 146.230.00). Carter and Burgess has agreed to develop the network for the price they quoted to us Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 o Page 3 during budget preparation, $29,400. Please let Bob Whitehead or City Engineer Ron Harper know if you have any questions. 6. Agenda Item No. 5F. Authorization for the purchase of GIS computer networking equipment. This request is for the purchase of all necessary hardware and software for the newly hired GIS Analyst and to provide a dedicated network server for the GIS Division. The system proposed will allow for future growth of the GIS Division while continuing the use of the current UNIX system. The new analyst will be operating on the Microsoft NT operating system, while the GIS Administrator will continue to use the UNIX operating system for several more years. This system will allow the city to transition between operating systems, and will allow the City to maximize the return on its investment in the system. The dedicated server will allow the different operating systems to share GIS information via the proposed network as well as with other NT stations in the City. The dedicated server will facilitate the movement of large GIS files making the information more manageable. Note that the funds for this equipment were approved in the budget, but are found in a variety of line items. Contact Bob Whitehead if you have any questions regarding this item. 7. Agenda Item No. 5G. Authorization to advertise for bids for Bicentennial Park Expansion. Phase II - Bid Package #1 (site and utilities) and Bid Package #2 (all sport courts). SPDC authorized this bid during its January 19 meeting. Upon approval of this item, we anticipate that the specifications will go out in early February, and we will plan to award the bid in March. This should put the project into construction by late March or early April. L. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 (:), Page 4 8. Agenda Item No. 5H. Funding approval for Carroll Middle School parking lot. This project completes the construction of the joint-use gym project at the middle school. The original plans called for a parking lot to be constructed to serve as parking for the new gym. The parking lot was/is needed to accommodate use of the gym. For a variety of reasons we have previously discussed, the existing parking areas at the school are inadequate for our use. At the time the gym was bid for construction, the bid cost was higher than we had estimated. This was due to several factors of which the foundation was most significant. The cost of the gym resulted in our delaying funding for the parking lot. You will recall that TPM, the project manager for CISD expansion projects, submitted a letter to my office requesting $117,509.50 for the construction of the parking lot. This exceeded the $70,000 budgeted by SPDC by $47,509.50. Obviously, this caused us concern because the difference was so substantial. We have since been seeking ways to work with CISD to lower the costs of constructing the parking lot. After studying the issue, we have determined that there are several issues at play. First, TPM apparently added $5,000 to the bid as "betterment" or contingency funds. This was done so that the need to approach SPDC with change orders would be minimized. We have removed this from the proposed cost. The bid also included items unrelated to the parking lot which the CISD was interested in pursuing (drainage enhancements, improvements to the existing circle drive). CISD has agreed to pay for these items, thus removing those from the bid costs to be borne by the city, and has also agreed to split the remaining difference above the budgeted amount of $70,000. There are a few ancillary costs (such as testing, etc.) which are appropriate to be funded through SPDC. Please see the memo from Kevin Hugman and the attached letter from Brent Kline for itemized costs. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 c) Page 5 The bottom line with this proposal is that agreeing to these terms would result in a total cost to the SPDC of approximately $86,000. Given that our budget estimate at the time was not based on an analysis of the specific site, and since this is a relatively small project which would likely not attract better bids, we are comfortable with moving forward with the aforementioned agreement. Note that SPDC approved this item at the January 19, 1998 board meeting. Please let me or Kevin know if you have any questions on this item. 9. Agenda Item No. 5I. Authorize the City Manager to enter into Professional Services Agreement Amendment #1 with MESA Design for Bicentennial Park Expansion. Phase IL SPDC approved this item at its January meeting. The memo from Kevin Hugman provides the details. L 10. Agenda Item No. 5J. Requested variance to sign Ordinance 506-B for Diamond Circle Estates. As discussed in the memo from Bob Whitehead, the Diamond Circle Estates Homeowners Association has requested to place a monument sign in the median at the intersection of Diamond Blvd. and E. Southlake Blvd. The Homeowners Association feels that the sign will help identify the neighborhood more easily. Although signs are prohibited in the right-of-way, several have been permitted in the medians of the newer subdivisions as part of the developer agreements. The proposed monument sign is 8 feet in length and approximately 4 feet in height and is of a brick construction to match the existing fence at the location. The proposed location is nine feet from the traffic lane. The only variance required for this sign is permitting the placement of the sign in the right-of-way. Contact Bob Whitehead if you have any questions regarding this item. L .a> Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 0 Page 6 11. Agenda Item No. 5K. Appointment of Reserve Firefighter Michael Sullivan to the Southlake Department of Public Safety. Fire Services Division. as a Reserve Firefighter. This item is being brought forward to you in accordance with Ordinance No. 554 which allows the Director of Public Safety to appoint qualified applicants to the Reserve Force, subject to the approval of City Council. The ordinance requires the reserve officer be a resident of the city, unless they possess special skills which make the appointment prudent. Although he is not a Southlake resident, Mr. Sullivan is a certified firefighter and is currently enrolled in EMT school, making him well- qualified. The memo from Director Campbell describes Mr. Sullivan's qualifications for this appointment. Keep in mind that our reserve firefighters commit to a 32 hour per month schedule -- a fairly large commitment. We are pleased to have someone the caliber of Mr. Sullivan take an interest in our program. This will bring our current total reserve strength to four (4) members. 12. Agenda Item No. 5L. ZA 97-177. Plat Revision for the Proposed Lots 2R1. 2R2. and 3R1R. Block 1. Miron Addition. There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The purpose of the request is to show lot lines concurring with current ownerships on each of the three lots. The only issue to point out is that there is a comment on the review letter for them to provide 60' of ROW per our current standards. The remainder of the existing ROW on the property is 56' in width per the previous standards. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 subject to the Plat Review Summary, allowing the ROW to remain at 56' in width. 13. Agenda Item No. 7A. Approval of Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District FY 1997-98 Annual Budget. Your packet contains a memo from Billy Campbell, L, director of public safety, as well as,the budget documents. Note that the items Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 0 Page 7 contained in this budget are the same items included in the two year budget you passed as a temporary board. This budget is for the remainder of the fiscal year. You will recall that by statute (and the Crime Control District budget policy you approved) you may approve or deny the budget, but you may not amend it. Should you reject the budget, the Council and the Board would be required to sit down together to work through any amendments. 14. Agenda Item No. 7B. ZA 97-159. Rezoning and Revised Concept Plan for Georgetown Park. Phase IV. The only issue unresolved with this request is the determination of the N-S road alignment from Graphics Drive crossing FM 1709 into Village Center East. Last week the Community Development Staff had a meeting with approximately a dozen land owners and developers north and south of FM 1709 in this area. The meeting was very productive and generally (with the exception of Ray Williamson- Hilltop Plaza) consensus was reached regarding the groups receptiveness to a new road alignment basically along the common lot lines of all owners. This alternative (called option 'C') is east of the alignment proposed by the applicants for Georgetown Park (Richard Myers and Tom Wouters). Mr. Wouters was present at the owners meeting and understands the common sense reasoning for the location preferred by the group. Their dilemma is that they need to move forward with their zoning and are anxious to prepare and submit a site plan. Apparently they are have significant interest in the retail aspects of their proposed development. Mr. Wouters told Greg Last that they were not going to raise issues with the preferred location of the roadway even though they initiated this discussion with an earlier submittal. Attached to my memo is an alternative concept plan eliminating the proposed road through their property. Although staff did not have sufficient time to review the plan Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 (la). Page 8 prior to the packet preparation, I wanted to include the plan to allow you adequate time to review the proposal prior to Tuesday's meeting. They do need to have a definite understanding on what will be allowed on this site, particularly related to drive access, before they close on the property. A question may arise as to why we would table the Hilltop Plaza request and not this request (should we decide to move forward). If so, there are two responses. First, there appears to be some major differences in the requests. Georgetown is immediately ready to move forward with a site plan and construction whereas Hilltop does not appear to have users driving a time line. Second, Richard Myers is receptive to either road alignment, whereas Mr. Williamson of Hilltop Plaza is hesitant at this time to commit to any type of road alignment accommodations. Besides the road alignment issue, there are no unresolved technical issues related to this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 with modifications as noted in the Staff Report. Feel free to contact Greg Last (x750) regarding any of the negotiations or property owner meetings or Dennis Killough (x787) regarding any of the technical aspects of the application. 15. Agenda Item No. 7C. ZA 97-151. Revised Preliminary Plat of Georgetown Park. Recall that the Council gave the applicant and staff direction to bring a revised plat forward eliminating the "flag-lot" layout while still providing adequate public safety access. This revision reflects that direction, although staff still must comment on the subdivision ordinance violation as to lot frontage in order for Council to waive the item officially. One other thought has been discussed regarding the waiver of the lot frontage issue. Staff feels it would be a good idea to include, as a consideration of granting the variance, that no buildings can be any closer to a lot line than as shown on the plan. This would eliminate any confusion as to what type of building setback lines Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 ,.. `-� Page 9 to apply, given that there technically would be not "front" on a public street. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 with modifications as noted in the Staff Report. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this request. 16. Agenda Item No. 7D. ZA 97-130. Rezoning and Concept Plan Southlake Garden Offices. The only revisions to this application since Council approval of the first reading 6-1 were in response to the directions given from Council during the last meeting. You will note the issue remains regarding the 4:1 slope setback and would have to be waived if Council were to approve the item per the motion of the first reading. Feel free to contact Greg Last or Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this item. (Ihre 17. Agenda Item No. 7E. ZA 97-176. Site Plan for Additional Parking Spaces (Sabre Building). There are no unresolved technical issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 subject to the review letter and asking them to reconfigure the parking stall layouts to save a tree. This revision is reflected in the plan before you. Feel free to contact Karen Gandy (x743) or Dennis Killough should you have any questions regarding this request. 18. Agenda Item No. 8A. Ordinance No. 691. 1st Reading. Approving Retail Base Rate Reductions for Texas Utilities Electric Company. The memo from Shana Yelverton explains the purpose of the ordinance. Note that this ordinance is similar to the ordinances passed by the Cities of Irving, Fort Worth, Hurst, Grapevine and others. The City of Arlington has proposed a much stronger ordinance. We are not moving forward with Arlington's approach for a couple of reasons. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 citt.) Page 10 First, the issue of depreciation shifting is so complicated that completely analyzing its impact on Southlake ratepayers would take a great deal of time, effort and money. For the purposes of this rate case, we are not prepared to make a recommendation to you on the depreciation issue. It is our belief that the assignment of depreciation is an issue best resolved between T.U. and the Public Utilities Commission. Secondly, the rate reductions currently proposed by T.U. are modest, but the reasonableness of the rates can only be determined through a comprehensive evaluation. Arlington makes the argument that no Texas regulatory authority has completely analyzed the situation. As such, they are using their ordinance to lobby the Legislature to take action on the depreciation issue and potential overearnings. We are not sure this is the appropriate forum to lobby the Texas Legislature on this issue, but if it is, we are comfortable letting Arlington carry it forward without us. Given the (61., ordinances passed by the other cities mentioned above, it appears they agree with our approach. The rate reductions would be 4% for residential customers, 2% for general service secondary customers (primarily small and medium-sized businesses), and 1% for all other customers. Additionally, residential rates would be decreased 1.4% in 1999. 19. Agenda Item No. 10A. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Developer Agreement for Timarron Village "H." Phase I. The memo from Ron Harper details the conditions included in the developer agreement. Note that the section pertaining to park fees has been written to require Timarron to meet the requirements of the subdivision ordinance regarding park fees, and that formal action on the specifics of this issue will taken by Council upon receipt of a recommendation of the Park Board. The Park Board is meeting on February 9. If they take action on this issue, and we anticipate that they will, you may be asked to amend this developer's agreement as early as your February Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 (1), Page 11 17 meeting. There is a chance, however, that the Park Board's decision may take some time to bring forward, due to the change in requirements of the subdivision regulations as discussed below. We are asking you to act on this item now so that the developer can begin earthwork, while the decision on the park fees is pending. On a related note, staff had planned to bring forward another developer agreement at this meeting, for Cedar Oaks, a five (5) lot residential subdivision. In reviewing the requirements of the developer agreement, Ron Harper noted that the new rules would require the developer to seek a recommendation from the Park Board in order to pay fees in lieu of park land dedication, even though he is not seeking credits. Section 7.05A of the subdivision regulations reads, "The City Council shall, upon recommendation of the Park Board, determine the acceptability of a developer's payment of fees in lieu of the land dedication requirement of this section." Section 7.07 states the process as "The Park Board shall make a formal recommendation to City Council as to the acceptability of any proposed alternatives to park land consideration." This is a departure from the practice we followed prior to the passage of the new ordinance. Needless to say, the developer has not approached the Park Board to ask their permission and so his developer agreement will be delayed. I bring this to your attention to point out a couple of things about the new ordinance. If the developer in this instance (Cedar Oaks) were to dedicate land, his obligation would only be a dedication of 0.125 acres. Normally, developers of these kinds of small developments would simply pay the required fees (in this case $5,000). Under the new ordinance, the Park Board could recommend to the City Council that the developer be required to dedicate off-site land, "with the consent of the City," instead of paying the fees. Additionally, if the city were to require the land, there are also provisions in the ordinance which require the developer to establish boundary corners L • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 0 Page 12 and extend a minimum size of 6" water main and sanitary sewer to the park, where available. This is provided to you FYI. We are unsure how the Park Board will approach the issue of fees, however, we will likely have unhappy developers over this issue, and staff wanted you to be aware of the ordinance requirements. 20. Agenda Item No. 11A. Tri-City Library. Attached to this memo is a letter received from Grapevine City Manager Roger Nelson discussing the tri-city library effort. On January 20, Grapevine City Council passed a resolution supporting the idea of a tri-city library valid only if the other participating cities passed a similar document within thirty days. Although I realize that this is potentially an emotional issue for some residents, Council must soon decide if you are interested in pursuing the notion of a (we shared library. Many of the issues which we have considered are highlighted below: There is a mistaken idea shared by many that the City of Southlake has paid for our residents to use the Grapevine Library. The City has contributed to the Grapevine Library since 1991, when we entered into an agreement to contribute an annual sum to the library system for the purchase of books. Over the past seven years Southlake has contributed $72,500 which Grapevine has used to purchase 4136 books for the City of Southlake. This contribution has increased the book collection in the Grapevine Library, but these books are marked as property of the City of Southlake. None of the dollars we have contributed under the 1991 agreement have been applied toward the operation and maintenance of the library. In fact, we cannot find where Southlake has paid for any costs associated with personnel, programs, or general maintenance of the facility since our citizens have been patrons of the library. Currently, the City of Southlake has over 7,000 residents who have library cards in the Grapevine Library (kir System. In 1997, over 100 new library cards were issued to Southlake residents almost Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 Page 13 (4110> every month. (The total number of cards in the Grapevine Library system is approximately 37,000.) As the City of Grapevine moves forward in expanding their current system and establishes the Grapevine Regional Library System, they expect the participating cities to contribute their fair share to the construction, operation, and maintenance of a new facility. The method by which this amount will be determined is subject to discussion, however it should not be overlooked that the library costs for either a combined or separate facility greatly exceed the current relatively insignificant budgetary allotment. According to information provided by Southlake's fiscal planning consultant, a Southlake venture into any respectable library program will cost over $760,000 in 2008 when the population estimate in the study is shown to be 29,280 (about $19.25 per capita in 1998 dollars). This is roughly within the range determined in a survey of eight area cities that currently have a median cost of$19.66 per capita. When this unit cost is applied to the 1998 population of about 18,000 in the study (we believe our population is actually closer to 19,000), the projected library operating budget would be $346,500. The annual debt service on a stand-alone 17,200 square foot library would be about $251,000 for a total cost of $597,500 for 1998 if the library was theoretically opened this year. This is the equivalent of about three cents on the tax rate. The only other viable revenue would be the possibility of sharing the current 1/2 cent sales tax (SPDC) eligible by statute for such programs. In any case, the City is on the threshold of a major decision that initiates sizable and permanent programming and building costs. Both a stand-alone library for Southlake and a tri-city library have their merits and disadvantages. A tri-city library would most likely have the benefit of scale, having cost savings in construction, operation, and maintenance. In addition, more and/or Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 (10) Page 14 better resources would be available, without redundancy in costly items such as reference materials, databases, and large specialty collections. Alternatively, if the library were a Southlake-only operation, the City could ensure the level of service desired by our residents and have more influence on the method by which the library was operated. An independent Southlake library would contribute to the sense of community and civic pride in the city. Staff has a proposal that may allow us to exercise some of both options. We will talk about this in detail Tuesday night. Meanwhile, if you have any questions, let me know. Note that if we choose to participate in the tri-city library in any capacity, we must have an action item on the next Council meeting agenda. L 21. Agenda Item No. 11B. Progress report on Council's Prioritization Schedule. This item was on your agenda last meeting, but we ran out of time. It is placed on your agenda again to provide Council the opportunity to review the status of various projects. If we are unable to get to it this meeting due to time constraints, it will be on the agenda for the February 10 worksession. We have again included in this packet the information regarding progress made on the projects prioritized previously by City Council. The "Progress Report" summarizes the current status of all the ranked projects, as well as several projects that were never formally ranked, but have been pursued due to other direction by City Council. The Progress Report represents feedback from all directors. Any questions pertaining to individual projects would best be discussed with the director in charge of the project. I have also included in this packet the timeline for Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 LI) Page 15 community development projects as most of the questions and concerns of Council members pertain to community development activities. Your guidance will be helpful as we will be discussing your priority list at our Director's Retreat February 19th and 20th, in preparation for our June City Council Retreat. 22. Agenda Item No. 11C. Right-of-way acquisition. This item has been placed on the agenda so we can discuss our process for acquiring right-of-way for specific projects, such as Phase II of the Denton Creek Pressure System (north side trunk line). We may have reached a point, given all of the land acquisition in which we are involved, where we should consider contracting with an agent to help us acquire critical right-of-way. To date, we have been able to acquire property with assistance from Dee Ekstrom, however, I have currently directed him to place West Beach lots at the top of his priority list for us. This leaves little time for him to manage all of the other acquisition that we need. I will provide you more specific information during this discussion item on Tuesday evening. In the meantime, please call me if you have any thoughts on the subject. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 23. February Work Session/Mid Year Review. This is a reminder for the City Council work session for Tuesday, February 10. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss public works issues which the Council has not yet had the time to examine in detail. Potential topics include the neighborhood sewer program, a cross connection program, F.M. 1709 traffic management, and other items. You will receive a packet no later than Friday, February 6. Hopefully all of you will be able to attend. These are all important items which require Council direction. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 0,, Page 16 We also want to remind you of the upcoming mid year review which is scheduled for Tuesday, March 24. This "work session" will generally focus on budgetary issues. Again, you will receive a more detailed agenda soon, but please put this on your calendar. 24. Robertson Settlement Conference. Terry Boone, our TML appointed attorney for this case, Lauren Safranek, Director of Human Resources, and I attended the conference. As we briefed you previously, it progressed as we anticipated. We will brief you on the specifics of the conference and the next steps in the process during executive session on Tuesday evening. 25. Parks Organizational Study Status Report. By now you should have all received a call from the study team. They are hoping to interview each of you as part of the study, as (re well as members of the Park Board and SPDC. Staff is also in the process of analyzing the responses to our comparative survey, and should have this part of the study completed by the end of next week. It is our intention to have the first draft of the study available for you at the mid year review. 26. Credit Card Use. On October 7, 1997, City Council passed Resolution 97-59 amending the previous fee schedule, and approving the use of credit cards to pay for court fines. The Finance Department is currently in the process of obtaining the credit card machines. The machines will be installed within the next couple of weeks, and should be functional in about a month depending on staff training, etc. For now, the only fees that may be paid with the credit card are municipal court fines, however, usage could expand to cover other fees depending on the success of this venture. 27. Multiyear Financial Plan Progress Report. Our financial consultant contracted to perform this project, Lewis McLain and Associates, has been meeting with various Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 co) Page 17 departments as part of his research. The only departments left to interview are Finance and General Government. It is our intent to have this plan completed in time to be used for the Fiscal Year 1998-1999 budget planning process, and as such we may be ready to discuss aspects of it during the mid year review. If you have any further questions regarding this plan, please feel free to contact Lou Ann Heath. 28. Additional Telephone Lines at Administrative Offices. As of Wednesday, January 28, we have installed four additional telephone lines at the Administrative Offices building, doubling the number of lines at that location. Citizens trying to call in have been experiencing a large number of busy signals, and staff has also been experiencing problems when attempting to dial out. The additional lines should alleviate these problems. We are also looking at the possibility of additional lines at City Hall because of the same problems with busy signals there. L 29. Dominion Problem Update. Staff has held several meetings with the Timarron developer in order to explore design alternatives and other options to remedy the drainage problems there. Carter and Burgess is developing cost estimates for these options. We expect to brief you in executive session on these options. If you have any questions in the meantime, please feel free to contact Bob Whitehead or Ron Harper. 30. Employee Banquet. I wanted to thank all of you who were able to attend the employee banquet last Monday. Employee recognition is important for encouraging staff dedication and pride. Your attendance and participation at the event reinforced your support of staff, and was appreciated by all. 31. Bob Jones Park/Marilyn Tucker property trade. Finally! After several months of going back and forth with the title company, the closing on the trade of properties was completed on Monday, January 26. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 (1.1)__ Page 18 Attached is an updated map on the status of purchases in West Beach. Note that the color scheme was changed to reflect the same color for lots purchased as that used to designate park land on the Land Use Map. 32. Baby Lenoir. Congratulations to Kim Lenoir on the birth of her daughter Annie Bond on Thursday, January 29. Annie weighed in at 8 lbs. 6 ounces. During Kim's maternity leave, Community Services Manager Kevin Hugman will be Acting Parks and Recreation Director. Kevin has been working with Kim the past few months to prepare for her anticipated absence. If you have any park concerns or questions, please call Kevin at ext. 710. 33. Charter Review Committee. The Charter Review Committee met Tuesday, January 27 (Ire for its initial meeting. They elected Ralph Evans as chair and immediately got to work discussing the proposed amendments that were developed by the City Council committee late last calendar year. The committee took no formal action on any of the recommendations. They will likely do so at their next meeting, scheduled for Wednesday, February 11, at the Community Center in Bicentennial Park. If you have any questions about their progress so far, please feel free to contact Ralph, Councilmember Scott Martin, or Community Services Manager Kevin Hugman. 34. Honorable Achievement. Chief Building Officer Paul Ward was recently elected president of the North Texas Chapter of the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). We are fortunate to have several individuals active and in leadership roles in organizations in their fields, and I feel it is indicative of the quality staff that we have in the city. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 Page 19 35. Texas Sister Cities. A meeting about the newly formed Texas Sister Cities organization was held January 28 at the Administration Building. Those in attendance included myself, Mayor Stacy, Mary Palko, Mike Farhat, Brad Bradley, Tracy Southers and Darcey Imm. It was decided to hold off opening a temporary office at Solana and hiring a part-time employee to oversee operations and instead, coordinate the organizational and administrative functions from the City's Administration Building using current city staff resources. All this really requires at this time is a dedicated phone line and fax machine. Other items of discussion included obtaining funding, membership dues, how the organization will office in the new Town Hall, and development of a web site. Tracy Southers will be preparing a news release formally announcing the new organization, its headquarters in Southlake, and contact information. The next Texas Sister Cities meeting is scheduled March 11 in Fort Worth. 36. Residential Fire Sprinkler Article. The memo from Billy Campbell and the Grapevine Sim article attached to it is provided for informational purposes. Let Director Campbell know if you have any questions. 37. Economic Development Activities. Following are some recent activities from the Economic Development staff. Feel free to contact Kate Barlow (ext. 776) or Director Last (ext. 750) if you have any questions or would like additional information. • Front page article from The Business Press: Attached to my memo is a front page article detailing specifics on Cornerstone Business Park that appeared in The Business Press the week of January 23 as a result of a meeting Kate Barlow facilitated with the real estate reporter of The Business Press and the development team for Cornerstone Business Park Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 up...Page 20 • The Courtyard at Timarron: Also attached is a Fort Worth Star-Telegram article on The Courtyard at Timarron highlighting the developer's desire to build offices for executives and small business owners who live in Southlake and Colleyville. The Star-Telegram's Tarrant Business also featured a short article on this development. • Summaries from The Business Press and Tarrant Business: Attached is a summary from The Business Press entitled "Tarrant County's largest industrial parks" with Solana identified as #9. You'll also find a summary from Tarrant Business identifying Tarrant County's largest health clubs based on membership; the Solana Club is listed as the eighth largest. .,. • AmeriCredit Search. Kate Barlow has been working with Steve Yetts to provide information on Southlake as AmeriCredit searches for a new location in the western half of the Metroplex. In particular, AmeriCredit is seeking information about the Northeast Tarrant County labor pool. We will keep you posted on progress. • Request from the Greater Dallas Chamber. Based on a request from the Greater Dallas Chamber, staff has provided information on over 40 businesses that began operating in Southlake in 1997 which employ 5 or more people; overall, these 40 businesses employ over 700 people full and part time. This information will be compiled within the 1997 Greater Dallas Economic Development Report which the Chamber plans to distribute locally and nationally. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest January 30, 1998 Lii...).04 Page 21 • The Village at Timarron. Drews Realty has recently announced 3 additional tenants committed to this development. K.C. Tailor (alterations), Bearrier Boutique (women's boutique) and Lady of America (women's only fitness facility). Kate anticipates receiving another announcement in 2-3 weeks. Other tenants committed are Bank of Commerce, Restaurants of Southlake (Tuscany, Stars, Great American Seafood), Duncan's Cleaners II, Just Java, and Ambiance-A Floral Affair. 38. FYI - Community Development Case Processing. The Community Development Department processed a record number of development applications during the 1997 calendar year. The total number of cases processed was 179, up from 168 in 1996 and 132 in 1995. It is also noteworthy that not only were more total cases processed, but there were more non-residential cases processed that required detailed review and Lie evaluation. Thirty-seven percent of these development requests (66 of 179) involved either concept plans or site plans. 39. News Clippings,. In addition to the articles included in your packet, I have three articles attached to my memo that I thought were worth reviewing if you missed them when they came out. CEH L • J'j 'ON 1•S;I.Lb1.USSt/)11 i3 i SYXJ.L :INYII III IOS I I e 4 j) o..,,_.r.a.: 1`L I Al dSYHd `(2idd NMO.L1 J210I J i ,.,i l 1 I!9 18 d' h I 1 CII ,,L, 1 1I _1.—% . li I 1 , i r' _, v I z�-i' • � ls0' t,I ! . ; p ,,i , II it ,,,i , ,I11; li : : \ go I 1 Ni* .ki r v� v,,. `�I` ttiy, .x 1_ I p1 t I1 �1 ,. hr°,� , I ¢ 1 �' e4 Iti,. 41` ' `\ (in1 If 7¢: HMI of Q1 al z i i d r i�.. u� oE oz w1'itc 1 :. r9p i •• \I C Sr yl Li 1 r r i 1�� ' ,A 'I i i li ..., !, ,r a Yg� {t -----_-__A /— o. [.1 ��uj..j t yyid G v t, '' I 1 ' �'Q� • L_J I' • �,,,4 R 7 f ii C g I f�l' '' r i SS ! I — _( ', .Je ...... ' 4'1 - 1 `� •P pR ! I r; yr v r r• •I !9[ - I- __ .S!Z' it I!�:.' ' , _ P ;', ! r,I ' ! i 3 , 1 t .1.\ r F-- „ ,, ,IL---i .1i :�p m Y� Fi .i �t r N ; ., . , 1 -1 P i' L i, 1,1 iI P Iz. Ii !! I 4 I wY x F tr ,1 ON _ l' 3' ! zl.` . ;'iI S ?? T - ' I , 6 !, ' 1G: � I 1. 1 I r t; p9 AA r a1 Y; V . i ' �2;4 pp i. II!! -I � 1 R IRI CCI -. _ : _ - vl Z , r 4 ,A , • ! S —LU Zi 0 1y i 1. #\t XO; 1- c _.J 1{ I 1 ti r z, p r. 1 gi-5 !tl ,' r' Yg'' a II It..! # _li Ib:� --. --ii-p . j i!s ' w1=ti { j'i 19 git—r g pp .,IA 1 t 1 1 r i m l 1.p 1 1 1. S . :1 C ' 1 _1 _I I .3+:1c1 _ ..wi Y f,! .,ir ;is , jl NI I_ AAA R. • r- - __ - • r 1 i p 1 s ,p; r' ! q ,[ fit 6i f $ f? +. * !;t{{ _j_lJ' _r I r , Oil �I v�' 1 er+ ,! +t it 1 i.S !I YII e., 0;1 ,,, �1 iil i1 1t r!1 1 ¢ t1 I! �: §! _ Ygi ' i•p y V 1 tilt 1 � ; } ;' � '•i '�' .4 ! L__.. —r-�u`�=I _,_,__ I low• i w, •t!` Fr= fff li {, .1: 44 i 3 GE - i t• 221 1 0', it-1 it 1!: t{ (, Yr I . _� poi 6 W 1 i• S1 aw I 1111 it ' ! '{ 'R d iA y i1Y'b 22 it '• 1 .4. "' i ,, '!� I (Di !ill 'pIl "';i d•C i1 l..f ti '• 1 't I w I [xl f!1 3q/I pp1 p r r !, r I 1 00 ! 1 --s 11,i 311 1)r 1. 1!i 1,.; - ! • (46..„ , I of ! F i1 az S 1 12 !4..� 0i Ii t i es eac w B h Addition Last Revision - 1/26/98 GOOSE ► « i- ., 04 r: gyJ7j/ r- r' r, 1 r- r, ' t rti f a �� % , Legend . fr'. City Owned Properties 1 . j ///�//////I� ® Under Contract I - Under Condemnation 12 CJ Private Owned Properties Within Future Part-ToI 1 I I it I '' ® Streets Never Opened r Di , I - II 11 Percent of Bauired sed on Toottai Acren age DRUM «A!-. 77.95% ® 257% ono asp555 i. is 658% I 1 ,2.90% Denton County i 1 _ Tarrant County l +. W-,_ E %. 1 r s Scale 1":400' City of Southiake Public Works Department * — IS WA JArI 2 21998 OFi'ii,Z:OF CITY V MAIOCER January 21, 1998 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: At its January 20, 1998 meeting, the Grapevine City Council passed the enclosed resolution supporting the tri-city library effort. Please note that the resolution will expire after 30 days if a similar document is not adopted in this time by each of the cities (ip, working on this project. While Grapevine remains committed to the concept of shared services and believes that through such arrangements tremendous savings can be generated for all involved, we have no desire to become drawn into or become a catalyst for political turmoil in one of our neighboring cities. The size of the existing Grapevine Library is inadequate for the level of service provided now and desired in the future. Grapevine cannot continue to wait for a resolution to the three-city concept that may never come. The citizens of Grapevine want and deserve a better library, and providing this facility, either shared or alone, must be my first priority. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Roger Nelson City Manager .., City Manager's Office • P.O. Box 95104 • Grapevine,Texas 76099 • 817-410-3104 • Fax 817-410-3002 • http://www.ci.grapevine.tx.us G' � i E. lW A S (my CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS CERTIFICATE OF CITY SECRETARY STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE I, the undersigned, Linda Huff, City Secretary of the City of Grapevine, Texas, a municipal corporation, in the performance of the functions of my office, hereby certify that L. (..,„:he attached resolution is a full, true, and correct copy of Resolution No. 98-01 as the same appears of record in my office, having been passed and approved by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, on the 20th day of January , 1998, and that I am the lawful possessor and have legal custody of said record. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at my office in Grapevine, Texas, this the 21st day of January , A. D., 1998. Lind Huff, City retary City of Grapevine, Texas (CITY SEAL) L City of Grapevine•City Secretary's Office• P.O.Box 95104•Grapevine,Texas 76099•Phone Metro 817/410-3182•Fax 817/410-3004 City of Southlake,Texas 7 MEMORANDUM (....., Janua ry 30, 1998 TO: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Residential Fire Sprinkler Article On January 22, 1998 the Grapevine Sun ran a story referencing residential fire sprinklers. The article was factual in its content,however, I feel there may need to be some clarification as to the Southlake Department of Public Safety's intent concerning the sprinkling of residential structures. We are trying to accomplish several objectives in Fire Service. Some of those objectives are to provide fire protection at the least amount of cost to the taxpayer; obtain a reasonable insurance fire rating which will be worth hundreds and perhaps thousands of dollars to the individual homeowner in savings on their fire insurance; and establish an area or fire load that can be handled effectively in an efficient manner. Philosophically, we support the 6000 sq. ft. residential sprinkling, but at this time we are still researching the positives and negatives in order to logically discuss this issue and provide everyone with current and proper information on the subject, when discussed. It will be several more months before we will be ready to address this subject in any fashion and this article should be construed for information purposes only at this time. 66. BC/bls Attachment I ("'' i 1 • (I., S The Grapevine SunfI'hursday,Jan. 22, 1998 Southlake may consider 'r fire sper proposal By Raymon D. Fullerton kler system could have helped the homeowners Stair Writer avoid much of this damage. However,he added, . . many residential structures do not have the Southlake -A proposal to require fire sprin- systems, including one home in Colleyville that icier systems in residential structures larger than is 12,000 square feet and another that is 19,000 6,000 square feet may soon be put before the square feet. Southlake City Council. Current regulations already require sprinkler Good value? d* systems in commercial structures that are larger # than 6,000 square feet. Addison,a Dallas County suburb of Dallas,has A spokesman for the Southlake Department of an aggressive sprinkler ordinance that requires Public Safety said recently that the proposal the systems in any building with more than 500 could be up for discussion by mid-February. square feet of space—commercial or residential. During the last few years,the size of residential Gordon Robbins,Addison fire marshal,said he structures in Southlake has continued to esca- believes that sprinklers are the most cost-effec- late. However, Fire Services officials are con- five fire-prevention method available to home- cerned because sprinkler systems are not rou- owners.The average cost,he added,is about$1 L tinely installed in the larger structures. per square foot,and state law requires insurance Other cities are also considering such meas- carriers to give discounts to homeowners who ures, officials said, and national fire statistics install sprinkler systems in their homes. support arguments in favor of sprinkler systems. Anyone who doubts the effectiveness of sprin- "Current data indicate that when a sprinkler kler systems,he said,need only look at national system is installed and operational in both corn- statistics regarding their use in commercial struc- mercial structures and in residences, the sprin- tures. This data reflects that of all documented klers are effective in extinguishing fires 97 per- fires in commercial buildings, 90 percent are cent of the time," said Garland Wilson, South- controlled with six or fewer sprinkler heads. lake's deputy director of Fire Services. "In early December there was a fire on the fourth floor of Addison Circle,one of our newest NATIONAL STATISTICS also reflect that apartment complexes.One sprinkler head knocked there are 85 percent fewer fires in residential down and then extinguished the fire.In fact,the homes outfitted with sprinkler systems, corn- young lady occupying that apartment was able pared to those without sprinklers. to return to her place that very night,"Robbins Considering the effectiveness of sprinkler sys- said. tems. officials said, the extra cost involved with installing them is a worthwhile investment. Mixed views "People should consider fire a significant threat to their safety," Wilson said. "Every one and a Not everyone remains absolutely sold on the i half hours there is a fire death in our country,and merits of sprinkler systems,however. a residential fire is reported each 74 seconds. I really need more time to study the different Those are negative figures which could be consid- sprinkler systems. Eventually I'd like to see the erably diminished if people began taking fire City come up with a sprinkler plan which satis- more seriously." . fies all of us who are involved with building and A recent Colleyville residential fire provided fire protection," said Bobby Harrell, who runs dramatic emphasis for Wilson's message.Although Harrell Custom Homes and has 20 years of expe- • no injuries were reported in connection with the rience as a builder. (tite.„, blaze.it resulted in damage estimated at$600,000, "When they go off inadvertently, water dam- including $475,000 in structure damage and S 12.5.000 in damage to the contents of the home. age is unbelievable.The most important thing in Johnny Collins, an investigator with the Col- a fire i 3,obviously,to get the occupants out of the leyvile Fire Department,said he believes a sprin- house without them being harmed." NEWS CLIPPING Source: The Business Press [ DATE: Week of January 23, 1998 LSouthlake plans. 1 ..,„ _; for 450,00sf : , And to keep up with computer technol- lt ogy, tenants will have access to fiber op- industrial pari tics."Most businesres looking far this size space are computer driven,"Teesdale said By Kali RODOA As far as design and amenities are con- Ili THE BUSINESS PRESS corned, Cornerstone is comparable t Colinas office space, "but in a better oca- SOUTHLAKE—Genesis Capital Advisors. tion,"S P� � Spencer said. ' of Dallas plans to break ground in Marc During 1997 the average gross office rent per a foot in the Las Colinas urban cm.on the i51),000 square-foot Cornerstone' Business Park. Located at Crooked Lane, south of% ter totaled S26.47, and Northeast Tarrant Southlake Boulevard, the 43-acre master::-1County's average was$23.30,according to planned development will provide office,-; M/PF Research of Dallas. showroom and warehouse space, said Lee For warehouse space, M/PF includes Spencer of Dallas-based Swearingen Realty`• Southlake in its west D/FW Airport region. Group,who is marketing the property with:, During the third quarter of 1997 warehouse. Chris Teesdale.Cornerstone is immediately' occupancy for the region totaled 93.1 per- west of Commerce Business Park. cent occupancy and 98.6 percent occupancy Phase one of Cornerstone calls for a for flex space, such as office/tech and of- fice/showroom70.000-square-foot oftice/showroom that space. may be divided into 7,000-square foot in The average warehouse rent during third quarter 1997 was $3.34 for all of Tarrant , see CORNERSTONE on page 13A County, while the west D/FW Airport I region's average warehouse rents totaled CORNERSTONE from page 1 S4.33. - 'he.Southlake area has a good premium crements and three 30,000-square-foot, over the rest of the county for rental rates," dock-high warehouses available in 15,000- said Sean Hockens of M/PF. square-foot spaces which will be available Southlake's additional commercial and in July,Spencer said. retail development go hand in hand, said Build to suits are also available and sites Kate Barlow of Southlake's economic de- are for sale,Spencer said. velopment office. "The market is crying for spaces in the "The development of this park adds to i 10,000-to 30,000-square-foot range,"Spen- our commercial tax base and supports the ; cer said. "This park is for companies that area as a growth corridor,"Barlow said. want to locate in an identity climate." . The park was designed to be flexible, Teesdale said. • "The sites could go from 5 percent to 100 percent office,"Teesdale said. Other uses include office fronts with warehouse space in the back,he said. The park is class A industrial construc- tion and is located in a triple free port zone, he said.Cornerstone is also deed restricted, and plans call for the first phase to have red brick and glass facades. ' NEWS CLIPPING l Source: Fort Worth Star-Telegram DATE: January 23. 1998 feveloerplans to -bring p the office close to home r. -Southlake business porate heads and financial people Courtyard at Timarron '-Complex will be within who live in Southlake and Col- - .• r - 4z-iii -Complex and are tired of the drive, Southlake Md. rt.Jwalking distance of the the high-rise situation,the park- Timarron neighborhood. ing garages,"Wouters said. v SOUTHIAXE Those people would be able to Site of • BY BILL W.HORNADAY work"in a luxurious,parklike S6.s million, .: Sur-Telegram Staff Writer atmosphere similar to their Ar Gamt s. 43.000 square- ` • OUTHLAKE KE—The Bevel- homes,"Wouters said.What's a buildings. 7'Soper of a$6.5 million office more,the offices will offer the complex that will be built in a advantage of being near busi- continental Blvd.W. _ Timarron residential area wants nesses along Texas 114 in the . . - ring home"people who Solana business park,he said. (Vend about an hour each day The demand for Class A multi- ' - t comm uting to their offices. tenant offices in greater North- wow. t. , . e 45,000-square-foot pro- east Tarrant County is tremen- 1 Courtyard at dous.According to WPF " 2,; •e,ect,known as The , :''''-'fmarron, is designed to offer the Research,a real estate research • same amenities as high-rise firm with offices in Dallas,99 siy.-et. „D.vE SEY.a,R offices,yet be within a short percent of Class A space and 92 development could bring as e—or even walking dis- percent of all multitenant space many as 170 jobs to Southlake. —lance—of executives who will in Northeast Tarrant was occu- "More and more people who .4. k there,said Tom Wouters, pied through the first half of work outside of the city they live '3-aite president of Grapevine- 1997. in want to work near their homes based Realty Capital Corp. With two to five tenants pro- to the point of where it's becom- "We're'targeting attorneys, jected for each of the complex's ing a national issue,"said Kate doctors, software companies,cor- five buildings,Wouters said the Barlow.Southlake's economic (kiwi development coordinator. have been done without that kind "In a 1997 phone survey con- of effort." ducted by the University of North Located on 5 acres at the Texas,only 48 percent of 600 southeast corner of White Chapel respondents said they work in Boulevard and East Continental Southlake. If people like living Boulevard,The Courtyard at here,they probably like working Timarron will be built in two here too,so it stands to reason we phases.The first phase is sched- will gain some jobs out of this." tiled to start in February with - Gaining approval for the pro- completion projected for July. ject was not easy,Wouters said. When the second phase is fin- With the complex just yards from ished by February 2000,the com- houses that typically sell for plex will consist of three 2-story $400,000, Realty Capital worked buildings at 9,900 square feet closely with Timarron Home- each and two single-story build- owners Association to allay con- ings at 7,500 square feet apiece. terns. Lease rates are expected to be "First,we assured them there about$18 per square foot, would be no convenience store at Wouters said,compared with the corner.Then,as we worked rates of$25 to$26 dollars typi- through our first and second cally found in Las Colinas. drafts,we consulted homeown- Although offices in each ers,City Council and planning building will average between and zoning,"Wouters said."In 1,500 and 2,000 square feet, effect,they helped design this some prospective clients have complex. Because of its location, expressed interest in entire build- this is a project that could not ings.Wouters said. L • • 7isg 9VS(Al� WEEK OFJANUARY IA.I99e PAGE la tul RT` �C0isT1 ter•ty's largest industrial parks w _ fawi Imam aiV61/ har M111/ Fa•0 INI N taste.aKtaa(Iii.,,, leu/ Stoat Loathsome* PHI seams Net Na*rate meet r•lee<® ��'N b eA Con Hama Team IS rth Spot rers . .s �� _ nw•etlw 1. meta r +Itte a r. < 'J�IZF w ?, 011us• -. .:rim•,: a':_.12 •. _ • I}iy111�i� . 11106• eel lye, .� �... _; ae.• AI"fk4 ef4( 2614277.fete 2. 1.71 Wos - .C. ►. ...2 Al MO*• eeY t>w Fca Worth i Parkway.IN.200. •, ' - - ti{ISI 1.2e3.aoo k=.1i, slaps 1 rrte�DNO l e11e1191e 61 E.A^•er.can Artksat,ied.,. + - �' fl7e Co.tre/ert - sane Fes «NOrdser^ Htfwased 3. ��K InWel{tse Gown/Mak Kraft e' orw.loq,n,r cap. Sorry 1.3.4444 .1tfevlflS >2f:' AMR Mardis( • 724.6000 11s Hass essions Part - - _ IHhte•n+j•hrtaq •. West tout)µ Ka•btr,Art.e.t, Nr.e�t •.YfoHa ~(1N)Nf-I A. Seth 1_10, forth Sp..lU, - - hr 700, area free 7NIt {7.eels. ISO O0 1(reatres.ea0 170p f2.30-fJ 1S 19{5/1996 Ie0 nes Harare.Goneral Moron. ' Cana tsseNHfriy serf WiX.Hughes MonyN Scow Krto.swChne Arid***7{{gip 172. 5. 72N fee4 f.. 700. Fen Watt 7i""w�'F .. . - - :. • Mark Stem*David Waken. 5,996d70,c ,„.ppet7 - Shan*Cork I{I.10J1 ! IMYIm: .}.�- • M1ea eG Ce..ARrypra, r•sll Cnrt eeelHesa Part '` • `'; . Meer /41rol an lad a 6. west 1.1f..a•mete t« f ra kw,sa lot ram _►red. den Cis- O.Mat Grant Fort Worth 7W7 •03$ •.,.ro'at if: 77b7ff7 S molten NS,000IfJ_H IMS/1996 �rA Corp.,Meowoak - 7f Coca.Cora eoruk.f C.al F .1 Woodbine N•namtl6 Cesstp • �tt�••IJHdre f Co, Tin Steen 7, Wnt 1•Jf Wet M Saes Fans le/wosc•Ce. DeMePnrn Corp. Feat wank 7{I» r eHe1.9n,1, I{I)ttefepet Silk" •- R 1.)0554022 573000' If1S•s7/Iffe 27 ; eO1A4/Ca., - •. . Nary If LMnHaI Park SWio Airborne • 8. Sousa t«a e7o■watt;Wu . 'amoral" .. ertan Born Nrana. t 1.1 f; Randolph I walk •rd. 7.3 maims IK.30W .. e71. • 2121 f 1.73-57.30 1970q 11I I BHr,G'eorN;beak.US.post Solana olBce,Moody Mary Scoot**ono.610-1700 9. f Tillage Circle,e. sea tt1•orb.s.ff,Weever Mulnple Dane Andersen 261-0222 Se•thNb)fN2' 2.2melon 4'S22d22 Wake. 0aN waken 2C-1 31 py tf•Mrk I9N/at/a -INaO• bud 877.11 • ua•I.ant.bl - t� rent Ft•4rH 10. fH7 E.Bcse4/o. Fort Worth 76717 1 77^.Ikan 17.000/ .._•. ,a=..>ro-.UT.. Ft�r7-SpYratP •+: 'Offl.f(2e $2-fS 30 1964/1992 126 Bee Textron,Masan Foods. R11.1, IM•aq Cjhdad Foods,Se.+M Ind,,,i 11. 1101 iranl OrMw a't Uofd C.Bear Lloyd C.&,r L., fen inn 7fiq 451.2010 • 1.7 nlar u•010Aorlei 1970/19ff 271 O•wldk~ 12. A<Nwft«t«ek 1.a.rstrl,l Park AeOnittlaid ' • MI'elpN - •:JM GNan le9•SSSS Arlington 760u . be5/101N de.hufgedltll• 3,-=; -!irwe7.:193 1.OS7.S00 S{.00WS).7s 19e7/1996 _ --.5' :- 71 LTV Oa States.Alfatsa Oak isn eUl«U hrf Hardwoods.Soc-rro Inc. rt7co Iropens•s Inc. )krt 1'ta(IaXh.Blake 13. Fare e W Mortensen •I.Seat►1-1f Wean 167.6803 Feet Wen,7,IN _ • 1.007,000 20.000124.7S 1976/1994 r'_s - :.:,,-•11rrUbr SO a0iburson Owen q Te476. el<hNna IndtstrNl Park - r' - - Sky**1isd1OV1•• titonant - ": : �F,•��t�' wood Walter 14. alrnrt Freeway at Na.fk en 6�F�'d Bkh4we Mills 7{111 I•Edervill<Bead. 933.000 S9.500/ ...� • 194611996 9 SO1Ihwestem Bee,Special+: . f2.9S-f7.25 �1996 16 Dispatch,Cummins Utility. 15. 111 f7 AjtHd«u pars F•^American Supply. E L.Baker Jr. E.L.Baker Jr.7)L 1211 Nn Freetry7 _ Harris packavni Fort Wtrn 7{Ile • Todd Burnett 861.7725 �- •ef0.000.. I(41124 ry;- t r H72/11>S eS T'tt{r••rr-Cf.arsls ., s • Mae.ye • foar7 lndnt.lal Park . r•7. 11st..0yseesn Corp t•etrnd Aepere•H 16. SNtq DrNe a.d f«th N c' • AIS Fey NaasOdd 7{OU al.Ser•eq • sfS-6177". _- 771.000 1s.00W ...,•;,- -` '. S)IS 197e/1996 IS Galbreath Inc.,Grinnell Firth lake t. s 17hrkee7 ONtrUe W - FYot•usion,er°•nefield Industries and°�Oprvt<Mc. hss M tf , eel f,Isar f °C•err owner J +bath Blake Mwrtenaa. 1 Nti.Htt e•IbebH 7fou t'r)<t 7 ONO/ T u - 467-6803 • • l- • --7,ppp sf lo-f2.h i97S/►lA',r 9 3 , Sm.,Food, Nelri.Eeaw,w - d iOktr.4'Coq pN>K,aWbo-ey�' • Ante Murk yynr S9e R-en<h StarMeoe, >.,.,` Oa.W Wmler;sn.n.da$ 18. Fort Worth 76111 • sfr '•261.1071 700.000 ONO/roles 197e/onsokse ONO S1ennsn Elec ' trice Bun fee Foods. Payee INratrl•1 Park-ISI drum,Canfield a Joseph Melvin Evans Michael 19. 7000 S./Hiatt St.. - parish ' 4ibfN.If017 - -. 031.0371 ''. 1 1. bt'S00. &o Z. �yo li730 Ifs/I»2- ill Fy'c°FRprtMa • 20e20 easl.on Park 4.-f rIlk**Ford.jaw T"I,_ pa eccurdu Inc:. ,.• Mabaeh-Nake410 Mpnar.ttmt. . 120f ors t« ' 1 --•. 6 9 - occupied Fen wan 7Hf0 'M `t '-` _ - ff7•M03 111.000 DND/ - s2.75-SS 197S/1 oat 93 Ghia/Adhesnea.Tarrson County FlOtif:rho MHMR.Tarrant Medical Valle , +tent Ir 606 /rrl '•rf•st erstsew d W wake p<hes'•k•duutr 0HD_a<w•.a.<w.•w_n„< &shw',.ads N. i s:cka ins�l vlefe an+r7i F.ec,d`°. '-Mmt1 t r•we O°ms v Jane'2 'ones kkweed flea.:I.C.nip„e Ord*.`r U. L scum.:*lie tars,sewn K••orrmhr:•akn•E.Awn - -•....IMMO.•/wwr11022.1N4•S NEWS CLIPPING Source: Tarrant Business DATE: January 19, 1998 „4 BY THE NUMBERS . HEALTH CLUBS • I 7Ranked by number of members in Tarrant County. Fit For Life Center - - - 1-20 and Bryant Irvin Road Bally Total Fitness Fort Worth 76132 110 W. Campbell292-8101 Road,Suite 100 Richardson 75080 Members:3,700 (972)301-5950 Locations: 1 Membership fees:$49 Members: 50.000 Monthly dues:$34 Locations: 4 Membership fees:S50 The Solana Club Monthly dues:S30-S40 2902 Sams School Road vitYMCA Metropolitan Fort Worth Westlake 76262 2 540 Lamar St. 49 t-4559 Fort Worth 76102 Members:2,900 335-6147 Locations: 1 Members:21,100 Membership fees:$300 Locations: 10 Monthly dues:$85-$115 Membership fees: $15-S150 Maverick Athlefic Club — - Monthly dues: S29-$44 1919 W. Pioneer Parkway Arlington 76013 P' Get Fit 273-3348 1005 Skyline Drive Arlington 76011 Members:2,500 860-0424 Locations: 1 Membership fees: S100 Members: 14,000 Monthly dues:$30-$40 Locations:4 Membership fees:$275 0 World Gym Monthly dues: $19 6080 S. Hulen St., Suite 500 4 A Huguley Fitness Center ! Fort 6800h132 11801 South Freeway Fort Worth 76115 Members:2,000 568-3131 Locations: 1 Membership fees: Vary Members: 9,000 Monthly dues:$17-$30 • Locations:2 Membership fees:$80-$120 Carter Rehab and Fitness Center Monthly dues:$34 F5140rt0 WEighth Ave. Harris Fitness Center 927-6190h 76104 1301 Pennsylvania Ave. Fort Worth 76104 Members: 1,800 878-5050 Locations: 1 Membership fees:S80,$395 or$495 Members:4,500 Monthly dues:$35-$45 Locations:3 Membership fees:Vary Ulti-Med Health Center Monthly dues: 632-$50 1001 N.E.Green Oaks Blvd. 6 ArHealth & Fitness Connection ssaioo176�s 6242 Hulen Bend Blvd. Fort Worth 76132 Members:750 346-6161 Locations: 1 _ Membership fees: $59 Researcher: Meg Young— — 1 Members: 4,100 Monthly dues: $19-S24.99 Locations: 1 Note: Clubs not responding to the survey Membership fees:Vary were unable to be included. 24 Hour Monthly dues: Vary Fitne5s;s unable to break down its member numbers by county. • Source:The health clubs i 1 r,.. .4w�,t► .rL- -r'_::._ VyJ., c �•I4�' l : - ah ,.'nF".(it i1 'u � '�34".C�c: jI Sour:e. `ation•s Cities Weeia l Date: 1 iy 98 Page 1 of 3 L EPA Proposes Stormwater Regs Affecting 3,500 Local Governments by Carol Kaheisen On January 9, 1998 EPA for- mally proposed new regulations for 3,500 local governments to control pollution from municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). The proposed new regu- lations will apply to all cities with populations of less than 100,000 located in urbanized areas of 50,000 or more. EPA is also encouraging states to review the appropriate- ness of applying the program to cities outside of urbanized areas which have over 10,000 popula- tion if the population density is 1,000 persons per square mile. The proposal, known as the Phase II Stormwater program, will be finalized and promulgated on March 1, 1999 and go into See page 4,col. 1_- - L as - !Z j; ure,:..S a:*40.211$'1. r- NEWS CLIPPING source: Nation's Cities Weekly Date: 1/19/98 Page 2 of 3 Stormwater 6cmpe effect in May 2002, with the municipal operations. complying v.-ith these new expectation that the 3,500 or At least one strategy for each requirements.EPA also proposes more newly-covered local gov- of the six minimum measures to develop. and is encouraging ernments will be implementing would be required. Unless a del- States to do likewise, a tool box a stormwater management pro- egated State(i.e., a State that is of Best Management Practices gram by 2007. authorized by EPA to administer (BMPs)from which local govern- The regulations — which the Clean Water Act and issue ments can select appropriate were developed with significant permits) has developed a list of implementation practices. EPA input from a large and diverse "regionally appropriate, cost- is also encouraging intergovern- Federal Advisory Committee effective"(at least in the State's mental cooperation by authoriz- (which included NLC) — are judgement) practices, cities ing larger cities to implement expected to be significantly less would have the flexibility to appropriate(or entire)stormwa- costly and complex than the reg- select which strategies they ter management requirements Dilations EPA developed for the would implement and to revise for neighboring smaller cities nation's larger cities (those with their selections during each five and towns where mutually populations over 100,000) in year period. Thirty-eight States agreed upon by the affected gov- 1990. have delegated authority to ernments. EPA is proposing to require administer the Clean Water Act; In addition, the proposed reg- newly-covered local govern- cities in the remaining States ulations suggest that States ments to implement six mini- will be permitted directly by take an active role in developing, mum measures,selecting appro- EPA. and where appropriate, dissemi- priate strategies for each mea- In developing the proposed nating,educational materials for sure from"tool boxes"developed regulations for the nation's the public;in providing local gov- by EPA and the States. The six smaller cities and towns, EPA ernments with the necessary minimum measures are: attempted to redress some of the tools and authorities to imple- •public education on the difficulties encountered by the ment the program; and where impact of individual action[s] on larger municipalities which have feasible, providing financial the quality of stormwater run- been required to implement a assistance to local governments off(e.g.,the use of pesticides,fer- stormwater program (Phase I in the implementation of the tilizers, etc. on lawns; improper communities) over the last five program. disposal of wastes, such as left- years. For example,rather than On the negative side, EPA is over paint or the contents of requiring individual National proposing that States impose pooper scoopers, in storm sew- Pollutant Discharge Elimination numerical effluent limits on ers); System(NPDES)permits which stormwater discharges in the •public involvement and par- cost the nation's larger cities an ' context of developing Total Max- ticipation, as required by State average of$650,000 per permit, imum Daily Loads (TMDLs - a or local law, in the development EPA will, and is encouraging quantitative assessment of of the local stormwater program; delegated States to,issue gener- =-waterr quality problems and con- •elimination of illicit dis- al permits. To obtain a general tributing pollutant sources spec- charges (both illegal dumping NPDES permit, a municipality ifying the amount of a pollutant and illicit connections to storm- would file a Notice of Intent with that needs to be reduced to meet sewers); the permitting authority (either water quality standards and allo- •controls on construction EPA or the State)that it intends eating pollution control responsi- activities (erosion and sediment to comply with such a permit, a bilities among pollution sources control as well as good house- significantly simplified and sub- in a watershed) for their keeping practices at the con- stantially less costly process for impaired waterbodies—require- struction site); obtaining stormwater permits. ments anticipated to be imposed •post-construction manage- Second, except under certain within the next two years.At the ment of wet weather run-off in circumstances, EPA's policy is same time,EPA states in the pre- new development and redevelop- recommending that numerical amble to the proposed stormwa- ment;and, effluent limits not be included in ter rule, that"neither States nor •implementation of good stormwater permits. EPA have the money, time, or housekeeping measures for To assist municipalities in other resources to create and NEWS CLIPPING çource: Nation's Cities Weekly I Date: 1/19/98 Page 3 of 3 expeditiously implement a pro- exempted from the stormwater gram that depends on establish- program requirements. ing cause and effect linkages The proposed regulations do between particular land use little, if anything, to amend the activities and specific water qual- Phase I stormwater program for ity problems." In other words, the nation's larger cities (those since local governments and with populations over 100,000). industrial sources are required to Confronted with new and untest- comply with enforceable permits, ed mandates,these communities they will bear the full burden of tried unsuccessfully to have their reducing any and all pollutants requirements revised to reflect affecting a specific waterbody or real world circumstances and waterbody segment in a water- attainable objectives. shed, regardless of the source of While EPA had drafted an such pollutants. economic analysis of the costs of The issue of numerical limits the proposed stormwater regula- is significant to all cities,since at tion, municipal members of the the present time there are no Federal Advisory Committee known management practices or challenged its accuracy and strategies,including construction validity at a meeting with the of treatment facilities, that are Office of Management and Bud- demonstrably effective in meet- get. Consequently, EPA is cur- ing effluent limitations for rently revising the analysis. stormwater runoff Both NLC and the State Cities and towns will also be Municipal Leagues have lists of required to map their storm sew- cities required to implement the er systems and identify major new stormwater program. In outfalls, a potentially costly addition, EPA will be holding requirement. In addition,States regional meetings to receive ver- and/or EPA will in all probability bal and written comments on impose monitoring requirements the proposal: Feb. 23,Washing- on cities to determine both the ton, D.C.; Feb. 25, Boston, MA; level and types of pollutants in Feb. 27, Atlanta, GA; Mar. 2, stormwater runoff and the Chicago, IL; Mar. 4, Dallas,TX; impacts of controls on these dis- Mar.6,San Francisco,CA Com- charges. ments on the proposed rule are The minimum measure with due by April 9, 1998. City offi- respect to development aria rede- cials are strongly encouraged to velopment activities will prohibit read not only the proposed rule such activities from having more but also its accompanying pre- than a 20 percent impact on the amble. The preamble. in addi- rate of stormwater runoff into tion to explaining the proposed receiving waters,a provision that rule,also raises issues and alter- is likely to affect local land use native strategies on which EPA planning activities. is seeking comment.• EPA is also proposing to require so-called municipal Details: The proposed rule "industrial" facilities (e.g. recy- and preamble are in the Federal cling facilities,transit operations. Register(Vol.63, No.6,pp. 1536- sewage treatment plants) to 1643.Jan. 9, 19981, and can also obtain a separate stormwater be accessed at permit by August 7,2001. These WAIS.access.gpo.gov on the facilities had been temporarily Internet. . ♦ ♦ .fit I h ._ .. ��. - .. -,- •_ 'dui:'.>'. .. -iw - j :�..'.�.. '�.AOtLl�. .ti - _ �`.�iT. NEWS CLIPPING Liource: Dallas Morning News (Business) Date: 1/11/98 I Page 1 of 3 t Judge Joe Kendall,a former police officer and ` ' prosecutor, proved he wasn't "a rubber stamp for the government"with his ruling Dec.31 declaring sections of the •Telecommunica- • •Lions Act of 1996 unconstitutional. • • . ' ' , •Morning Revs Ale photo Judge steers mavericcourse Ruling striking down part of telecom act u ends industr p y By Richard A. Oppel Jr. prosecution lawyers. gaff Writer of The Dallas Morning News Indeed,attorneys who regularly practice before the Before he turned the telecommunications industry 43-year-old jurist say they weren't surprised by his New upside down last month, U.S. District Judge Joe Ken- Year's Eve ruling that declared unconstitutional the dall was best known in Dallas for handing out stiff sections of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 sentences to a ring of Carter and Hillcrest high school that keep San Atnonio-used SBC Communications Inc. thieves while he was a state judge in 1989. and other Baby Bells out of the long-distance business. In that case, Judge Kendall seemed to confirm to Whatever the legal merits of Judge Kendall's deci- critics his background as a former street cop and a sion —many government and legal experts'predict a tough prosecutor.But to many lawyers and judges,the swift reversal—if upheld,it would allow SBC's South- Carter-Hillcrest episode—which Judge Kendall later western Bell Telephone Co.and the other Baby Bells to referred to as his"albatross"—masks an eagerness to offer long-distance service in their home regions for challenge the arguments of government and Please see JUDGE'S on Page 2H. L NEWS CLIPPING,,vource: Dallas MorningNews (Business) I Date: 1/11/98 Page 2 of 3 , Judgegoes distance ___ for Bells ____________ str ikig downn part of telecom act Continued from Page 1H. quickly than in Dallas. the fist time since they were divested by 'This judge is known for being fast, he AT&T Corp.in 1984. doesn't sit on things,and he moves his docket Disclosed late in the afternoon of Dec. 31, along,'said Jim Ellis, SBC's general counsel. the decision angered government regulators, 'That's why we went there.' the Clinton administration and long-distance • providers such as AT&T—all of whom intend AtYP'cal rise to appeal.It also prompted cliches about"may- Judge Kendall's rise to the bench was crick'Texas judges and speculation that SBC quick,but followed an atypical route for a fed- filed its lawsuit in out-of-the-way Wichita Falls eral judge. precisely because the company knew the case After growing up in Pleasant Grove,an 18- would be handled by Judge Kendall. The year-old Mr. Kendall signed on as a Dallas judge,splitting his time with his courtroom in Police Department cadet in 1972 and spent six Dallas, is the only federal judge in Wichita years on the force while finishing college Falls and hears all of the cases filed there. classes at Southern Methodist University. He For example,Mark Rosenblum,AT&Ts vice quit the police department just before becom- president of law and government affairs,said ing a sergeant to attend law school at Baylor last week:"I do give SBC credit for being cre- University. Later he worked as a Dallas ative [in crafting its legal strategy),although County prosecutor. I'm not so sure it's on the legal scholarship Not yet 33,he was elected a Dallas County side so much as it is in doing the research and state district judge as a Republican in 1986. figuring out a good division of a district court During the next six years, appeals courts in which to file a complaint like this.'. would reverse him just three times. Royce Caldwell,SBC's operations president, In 1992,President_Bush,acting on a recom- says he's not surprised opponents*mild seek mendation from Republican Sen.Phil Gramm, to caricature Judge Kendall. 'It think it's in notitiaated him for the federal bench. Yet their interest to picture him this way,'ha says. Judge Kendall also ra eived a strong endorse- And he notes with interest that he can't ment from former U.S. Rep. John Bryant. D- recall similar comments about the St. Louis Dallas, a hard-nosed progressive who usually federal appeals court judges who sided with didn't find a lot to agree with Mr. Gramm the Bells last year and threw out Federal Com- about. munications Commission rules governing Lawyers and judges describe Judge Kendall local-phone competition. as animated and assertive.He freely "I don't know that they pictured them as a some witnesses and,some lawyers say, appears s bunch of handpicked bumpkins, too,' Mr. more vocal and involved in trials than other Caldwell said. judges.They also say he can be very testy with 'SBC executives say they decided to file lawyers he believes are ill-prepared, or are their lawsuit in Wichita Falls after research making poorly reasoned arguments. Through show d they could geL a ruling there more questions and (ther comments in court, they fra. - NEWS CLIPPING L,- Source: Dallas Morning News (Business) ness) I Date: 1/11/98 Page 3 of 3 say' he sometimes gives jurors a good idea of wouldn't believe the deputy. He didn't, Mr. requiring the Baby Bells but not other phone whose testimony he believes and whose he Larson said. doesn't. companies to meet a strict 14-point checklist Surveying attorneys one year ago, Texas Attention getter before they can offer long-distance service,is Lawyer magazine said that while lawyers don't The judge hasunconstitutional. The law, Judge Kendall think Judge Kendall favors prosecutors, his 1 g gained attention while mak- declared, penalizes the Baby Bells without ring short shrift of government claims in a giving them a fair trial. judicial style strikes some as that of'a tough number of other cases.guy on the bench who still acts like he is car- 'The court can reach no other conclusion guy rying a gun and who a badge.' Last year,he dismissed for the second time than that Congress ... intended to punish federal charges against former Dallas banker the [Baby Bells) for their former parent In contrast to the rude shock SBC's compet• Bernard Schuchmann,citing insufficient evi• AT&T's transgressions over two decades ago itors received last month,a number of Dallas dence. In 1995, prosecutors had won a new or for crimes defense lawyers say Judge Kendall has been, indictment of Mr. Schuchmann after Judge concluded. Yet to be committed," he as one put it,a'pleasant surprise.' Kendall had thrown out his 1993 conviction on Critics of the ruling note that before the Even attorneys who describe themselves as conspiracy charges.left-wingers or card-carrying members of thea federal law was passed in 1996,the Bells were American Civil Liberties Union say they are mimed Mr.Schuchmanseven-dn's fraud charges trial, the ,this in long-distance because of dis- even further away from la court decree able to that co—"--table with,or in some cases even look d taking f o,trying cases before him.His police deliberat n action before so prosecutors touldn't appeal indefinitely.ckept them out of the business a:. cution background is no worry,they his ruling. ey. They say the ruling would disable the!ed- "He's got a great judicial temperament,and woman S2 million aftered she fi in led a c5,he ivil i rights scheme twarded a eral o let the ells intolong-distance balanced nl he's street smart.Most judges,I wouldn't have lawsuit alleging that Archer County Sheriff after competitors have made progress wading these kinds of comments about,' said Frank Presley Lamar Pippin raped her soon after she into local-phone markets that so far have seen Jackson, a leading Dallas criminal defense had shot and wounded her husband. very little competition. lawyer. Mr. Jackson describes himself as 'to Separate grand juries later declined to -We have a telecom act that is currently the left of [Marxist revolutionary] Che Gue- indict the woman for the shooting,citing self- not operational,' AT&T chief executive C. vara, but I still like people like Joe Kendall defense, but also didn't indict the sheriff- At Michael Armstrong said last week. 'The because they're fair." the civil trial, however, Judge Kendall industry and the government need to step Doug Larson,a Mesquite lawyer and expert decided the sheriff was lying when he back in the midst of all this and discuss alter- on civil rights litigation who has both asserted that the two had merely had consen- natives to accomplishing opening markets, lefended police officers and sued police sual sex iepartments, said of Judge Kendall: 'Heo havingr choice and creating local ioesn't like to play around with formalities. concluded,,The court e sheriff's belief,* lthat twhe ga co competition.' to those familiar with Judge -Ie likes to get to the guts of the case as quickly woman says,'No,'it means,'No.'" is he can and not play lawyer games." en Kendall's willingness to go against the New Year's Mr.Larson recalled that in a case in which Eve ruling.th Invoking as his con rarely used legal con- surprise.government's grain. the ruling was hardly a • :is client alleged she was beaten by a sheriff's cept that bars what is known as a -bill of Said state appeals court Judge Ron Chap- .eputy,he didn't hesitate to opt for a nonjury attainder,' Judge Kendall endorsed SBC's man,a Democrat:'He's not a rubber stamp for 'ial because he was confident Judge Kendall argument that the 1996 federal telecom lava,by the government.' • NEWS CLIPPING Lr/Source: FTW Star-Teleeram (Northeast Tarrant) Date: 1/25/98 Page 1 of 3 Qualityschools, thriving cjties Education system's influence felt far beyond the classroom The first in a yearlong series examining issues in education. settle for a less-than-perfect house and pecf pay more for it BY CHRLS VAUGHN for schools.On that there is no compromise." Stu-Telegram Staff Writer Saying that quality public schools is important is G The houses are important. Prices and neighbor- stating the patently obvious,particularly to any par- hoods are crucial, too. So are work opportunities, ent. But beyond the sig nificance y of educating chil- crime, location,libraries and streets. dren, school districts play a vital role in determin- ButSr one thing almost always trumps them all as a ing whether a community thrives. b factor in where a family decides to live—the schools. Schools, as much as any other factor, fuel "Schools are the No. 1 thing I'm asked about,"said (More on SCHOOLS on Page 19) WHY SCHOOL Paula Brittain, a real estate agent who sells homes >Hitting the books:Education series will tackle tough DISTRICTS MATTER throughout Tarrant and Parker counties. `People will questions about schools.Jim Witt,Page 1E NEWS CLIPPING Source: FTW Star-Telegram (Northeast Tarrant , Date. 1/25/98 Page 2 of 3 Sch o• i'.' k:) „Soa ,., .: of the Fort ser=iiimili From Page I Worth school district Middle schools Ng 21 growth patterns in Tarrant County, according to experts in development •1 7.. . Miph oenoo4_t�12 t I and urban affairs. Good schools •••--—.- "� ' Tay generally bring population and busi-ness growth,a healthy tax base,ris- %t rslC ,.- %r ing property values and a better $1.41It pet$1 r,-1 quality of life. Bad schools,on the a19eMeilee =MI other hand,can discourage business pM. • TAA>!growth.hamper home sales and taint • . .•', gigot SAT collage entrance•. a community's image. tsSt�M �� *map score 946 In this• the families of North (state �8 In 1 97 and 79 21 lea score Texas—those with children and r those without,those in Fort Worth, all*ker41d9911r Arlington,Keller or Colleyville— are inextricably bound together. ' . 'The quality of the school system ' &wags Ammo years Teacher/pupil i can make or break a city."said ,'turnoff sabre, aexperwece rand Michael Casserly.executive director a-. ; 1,292 $34,111 11 19.7 of the Council of the Great City �' t • Schools in Washington, D.C., a ':•',• .'. coalition of the nation's largest • »•962 school districts. "It is very difficult Other 2.4% ______.---110 to maintain a healthy city of any size Eruollmeat la put five years 0 unless its public school system is in od shape." 72,349 go In Tarrant County, perhaps n��/� single school district wields more 99,429 influence on the area's future—and concerns leaders more—than Fort amo Worth's. 1 1911-96 1996-96 1996-97 1997.96 The Fort Worth school district, tr.uoart the county's largest, has almost 77.000 students.including high con- wrT i.n+..vwvi R non.. centrations of disadvantaged chit- serve about the same number of stu- news for dren and a history of below-average gang problemsoo thang for its test scones. dents as Fort Worth.Although Fort academically rigorous programs. It is saddled with the Worth has annexed land to the north "People who aren't from here moni is alsos an ddled district,the to expand its tax base into the fast- know Fort Worth has great muse- monike r of an "urban"an and upper- growing Alliance corridor,residents urns and a great performance hall le conjures es u of new subdivisions there,such as and Van Clibum and all that,but do iof ncomepeistort u s uh images Sm �O�'� children to they know anything about the big-city Keller schools problems,such as the racial divi- Experts, such as Universityof schools?board membersaid ElaineF Klos,a sions and corruption in Dallas or the Texas at Arlington school in Fort Wortha crumbling school buildings of Geisel,saythey professor Paul Countyud chairwomen a the pment Washington,ac. growth of suburban Workforce Development Many in local government and districts doesn't necessarily mean B�_„ has been our fault" business circles believe that much of are leaving Fort Worth and Certainitr,land availability and Air- the phertontenal corporate and resin .Rather, it reflects the many proximity to Dallas/Fort Worth Air- the h growth in Arlington, Keller, I�Ple who move from Denver,San gt Diego,Houston,Detroit and other port are factors in the explosive Grapevine,Southlake,Lewisville• cities and never consider putting growth of communities between Mansfield and other communities is their children in Fort W�or Dal- Fort Worth and Dallas. But Walt • not just a result of those cities'sue- las public schools. Sosrtowski.a senior y Corp.,<trtt with cesses,but also a result of the prob- "This goes on everywhere in American Metro Study Cor a Dal- lems—both real and perceived— America,"Geisel said. "Just the las company that provides research in the school districts of Fort Worth phrase 'inner-city school' — to home builders and developers. and Dallas' ocoohhh." ' said good schools are often the "It has hurt us when we have fl biggest factor in igniting develop- companies locate here and many of The Fort Worth district enjoys a menu better reputation nationally among "Southlake is a great example of their employees select the suburbs as a place to reside because of nega- educators than it does among local how the strength, reputation and tive perceptions of Fort Worth ISD," residents, according to Casserly. quality of a school district can affect said Fort Worth Mayor Kenneth Although it is not considered an home prices and the pace and speed outstanding"big-city public school of development."he.said. Barr.who considers the district cuts- " cial to maintaining a vibrant city. system,such as Seattle's and Oma- A reputable school district often ha's.Casserly said the Fort Worth helps homes sell faster and sell for While enrollment in the Fort Worth school district has grown by school district is"very strong"and . more,Sosnowski.said.Realtors said 10 percent during the last four years. P a le h and t those in El Paso, schools are even a top priority for creating overcrowded conditions at ttsbutg6 ti3mteapolis- couples with grown children or no campuses such as Paschal High Among the district's strengths,he children,simply because the resale School, enrollments in the six said,are the variety and diversity,of ...value is higher school districts in Northeast Tarrant program,tough academic standards _ Brittain said she has clients"turn- County have expanded by 15 per- and strong management. As an ing down dream homes" in other example,several people pointed to parts of Fort Worth to live in the Together, those districts now Paschal,which is more often in the city's Tanglewood area, where the NEWS CLIPPING Source: FTW Star-Telegram (Northeast Tarrant) Date: 1/25/98 Page 3 of 3 Marton( arrant sums IYeu'wt,1p-uarw 7 ,?Q t �v�age of all muse opport Mama lib 17 ,�,M - r . ties,"sod Cerarioa Wy1i 1 a ,. - eudvt8e 18,515 20.350 20,728 12% ''" woman for Ptiahtstre hed •.., Carroll 1,921 4,799 5,364 179% . talent is already stretched thin. ' Grapevine- 8,706 12,006 12.875 -48% Dot Qritieal right"o"'•but t do„ coisyvils • , having a strong base in the ,- H•E•8 18,663 19.118 14,327 3% ,.I 1 from high school on up is' , _.1_ Keller gig: 12188 6T� ;�1�1 important for businesses like• .._ Northwest 3,1)g..:. 4,513 13,779,689 - -► The business world, the F.' , ?tltal 18'>: ti - Worth Chamber of Commerce and p the Fort Worth school district have Good scuttle an a top long had a relationship through pro. reason that new "' - _ �°s as Adopt-A�l and are no that to rIs ..'ismr- C f� .which hand in the businessclass Tarrant County.Ms sir ?'3+' ?t .150 community a in building public school dbtrlcts jAf10r • . 1.01 1.74 calwa• In fact,such programs have welcomed 17.505 Q 1.05 1.54 are COnmon all over North Texas new students sines 1990. 8 1.13 1.61 „: now. r About Iwo dozen was added to :pprN' ''l , • 125 i' 1.50 "It's ailtnaism,if you will,but it's keep ita with growth.ang have Inched 1.35 1.88 elf-scvior altruism."Walters said upward to pay for the buildings. of between schools and Peons and equipment• 73.271 76.752 corporatiprLL 71,982 • Fart Worth city leaders,equally Tst Nye 86 769 69�2 • _ •f- t concerned about the future of the 64,167 • ., . y school tbonet,have helped increase 59,247 • •.•s,.;Y �-',' `'.1 _• the number of police officers in • ., t►�' I schoois,discussed sharing facilities ':%.4: •.f:- -• and encouraged discussions with �1 'i "` S°y.-.. 4• i t school district leaders "You can't get a good education fa t¢•ss >, u ,ed ss YI•• • without a safe city. You can't get a good education if you can't drive ,o,.,s.,..,, down the streets to the school"Barr neighborhood elementary school area with sports a 97 percent passing rate on find enough good schools,not only to I don't think you can say one is the TARS tests and where gh qualified people to hire, more important than the others. third A students are almost a but also to ensure that their employ- They're all fundamental to a suc- talentof the students gifted and ees will be content enough to stay cepas r'" She said movingto and raise families. Fast growth in y createsding cum_ North demand other clients a new e in At Alcon Laboratories.one of the munities eventually its own the Texas school district,whichworld's leading ophthalmic peoduct R ems• among those given the slate's topm companies,with In Arlington, the 5 tudent south Fort Worth,headquarters in far school district has grown large educational rating of"exemplary" Haman Resources Vice President of last "even though Jack Walters said enough and diverse enough that find it a year,a they couldn't school districts in Tarrant County the pros leaders are striving most avoid at fit" maP if you were Pointing have an immense effect on Alcon's the Rheas that hobble big- and Deborah Kay had never ability to temuit tap scientists from cuty;We have thstriful other areas of the country. We a full range of chal- BobIretcaxrd hing s�clwol districtse beef gan He said Alcon has lost some from a very diverse Samp- moving from upstate New York ear- coy because of Fort Worth's Lion of students,"said David Samp- IY last year for Bob's new job in Irv- schools,And when others join the son, president of the Arlington ing• Y they face a long commute of we do have s What they found near the top was from_the communities where theyl do have some pockets the Carroll school district,where choose to live. of special challenges•as a whole,the than 90 of the 5 30e "I have not seen a lot of people school distract is very,very tmng.• betterenth thepercent TAAS tests.5300 pick up and move out of Fort Sanipol who creditsfor thong that districtd ispass "exemplary" worth,-Walters said. "What I will ton school district for third-largest that ate.In Fort rated by tell you is that many of the people in city emerge asl the said anyyrcey city y meson• the sciences, the pharmaceutical a sett has a city that sys- 57 percent of students pass the TAAS testsn and c ad si experts,the marketing people that can prove it eat a quality school don is merely"acceptable." gns we have brought in,do not live in rem can write its own ticket because They toured the district and the Fort Worth.They live in Colleyville everything else will ll into place. neighborhood elementary school orArhngt°n a the Mid-Cities" -p ra issue more impor- their daughter would attend, met Many high-tech companies like rant too corporate America than a teachers and looked over cur- PrimeCo Personal Communications. well-educated,f we"he d and to teachers —all before theythe h- which located in Westlake in 1995. abundant work a competitive said.-The an- their home. 8 and semiconductor maker Intel cities have a advan- tage in the future will be those cities "When you have children, the Corp"which is building a plant near that successfully meet the challenge are your world,"Deborah Kay said. Worth,struggle to find employees Alliance Airrt in north Fortof educating kids. "You want to make it the best you who are capable of performing tech- can,and if you find a school district nical or engineering tasks:As ,. where you and your child are �'� You feel like ham'• result,both companies are helping •dt' : 1 s You're doing the right developPi 8 thing? curriculum for the Tarrant 01 t In much the same way. County Junior College system and 'the Ohio firm ►. :•, liars haveu R the similar interest is public working with school districts like an academic QUt�0f tile, schools.Businesses want to bein an NorNot only Fort Wbrth SCh00I di{tfl• - "Not are there tremendous J • > 00 a0 (...- 0 ..:, .., IIIIIIIIIII N s .a et w .n w • GO 1.4 v ~ O w a ex a il 1.) .S § ts A ,p 00 .oQ a E ENZ0 CV U x N g ®0u % ,?Jaw v a. v, .4 I .e 4 .E E .c E E r p4 •, I N gU -1 $ Q ®$ $ w E — i 00,,JD q a .4 40 a r. U w a.� w � E wq� g E .A w a > �� 8 $ 3 8 a 0..v. E4.0 y -S U M U s ® U U O U w S AIV eny E 0. e Oh E. E .c Cp +� 0. • g•E �+ E ® � E €CI" ro 0 ,o e., � ii Vou q .� v �p > W . � � � IJ •� E. S \it JAN 2 21998 OFFiCZ OF CITY MANAGER e / spy January 21, 1998 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Curtis: At its January 20, 1998 meeting, the Grapevine City Council passed the enclosed resolution supporting the tri-city library effort. Please note that the resolution will expire Li after 30 days if a similar document is not adopted in this time by each of the cities working on this project. While Grapevine remains committed to the concept of shared services and believes that through such arrangements tremendous savings can be generated for all involved, we have no desire to become drawn into or become a catalyst for political turmoil in one of our neighboring cities. The size of the existing Grapevine Library is inadequate for the level of service provided now and desired in the future. Grapevine cannot continue to wait for a resolution to the three-city concept that may never come. The citizens of Grapevine want and deserve a better library, and providing this facility, either shared or alone, must be my first priority. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Roger Nelson City Manager L City Manager's Office • P.O.Box 95104 • Grapevine,Texas 76099 • 817-410-3104 • Fax 817-410-3002 • httpj/www.ci.grapevine.tx.us GRAP T E .C1‘ A S CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS CERTIFICATE OF CITY SECRETARY STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE I, the undersigned, Linda Huff, City Secretary of the City of Grapevine, Texas, a municipal corporation, in the performance of the functions of my office, hereby certify that Lthe attached resolution is a full, true, and correct copy of Resolution No. 98-01 as the same appears of record in my office, having been passed and approved by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, on the 20th day of January , 1998, and that I am the lawful possessor and have legal custody of said record. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at my office in Grapevine, Texas, this the 21st day of January , A. D., 1998. Lind Huff, City retary City of Grapevine, Texas (CITY SEAL) L City of Grapevine•City Secretary's Office• P.O.Box 95104•Grapevine,Texas 76099•Phone Metro 817/410-3182•Fax 817/410-3004 RESOLUTION NO. 98-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ENDORSING THE CONCEPT OF A JOINT LIBRARY WITH THE CITIES OF COLLEYVILLE AND SOUTHLAKE; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO DEVELOP AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THOSE CITIES AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Grapevine City Council believes library services are an important City amenity; and WHEREAS, the City currently provides library services, by contract, for the Cities of Colleyville and Southlake; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended that the City Council negotiate an agreement with the Cities of Colleyville and Southlake to build and operate a joint library facility; and WHEREAS, such a joint facility would support more diverse and higher quality Li programming than three separate facilities; and WHEREAS, it is projected that a joint facility would save the City of Grapevine in excess of $1,700,000 in capital costs for an expansion of the existing library and $257,000 annually in operating costs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That all matters stated in the preamble are true and correct and incorporated herein as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the City Manager be directed to work with the City Managers of Colleyville and Southlake to develop an interlocal agreement for the development and operation of a joint library. Section 3. That this resolution is effective from and after the date of its passage if both the Colleyville and Southlake City Councils pass a similar expression of commitment to the three-city library within the thirty day period ending February 19, 1998. Without such commitment, this resolution is null and void. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITRY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of January 1998. r • APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Lind Huff -%Ce City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: C7) ( `-17A John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney L RES. NO. 98-01 2 J City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Residential Fire Sprinkler Article On January 22, 1998 the Grapevine Sun ran a story referencing residential fire sprinklers. The article was factual in its content,however, I feel there may need to be some clarification as to the Southiake Department of Public Safety's intent concerning the sprinkling of residential structures. We are trying to accomplish several objectives in Fire Service. Some of those objectives are to provide fire protection at the least amount of cost to the taxpayer; obtain a reasonable insurance fire rating which will be worth hundreds and perhaps thousands of dollars to the individual homeowner in savings on their fire insurance; and establish an area or fire load that can be handled effectively in an efficient manner. Philosophically, we support the 6000 sq. ft. residential sprinkling, but at this time we are still researching the positives and negatives in order to logically discuss this issue and provide everyone with current and proper information on the subject,when discussed. It will be several more months before we will be ready to address this subject in any fashion and this article should be construed for information purposes only at this time. 66. BC/bls Attachment A I (...., 8A/The Grapevine Sun/Thursday,Jan.22, 1998 Southiake may consider fire spriproposal ler By Raymon D. Fullerton kier system could have helped the homeowners Staff Writer avoid much of this damage.However,he added, many residential structures do not have the Southlake -A proposal to require fire sprin- systems,including one home in Colleyville that Icier systems in residential structures larger than is 12,000 square feet and another that is 19,000 6,000 square feet may soon be put before the square feet. Southlake City Council. Current regulations already require sprinkler Good value? systems in commercial structures that are larger Addison,a Dallas County suburb of Dallas,has than okes0 an fore feet. an aggressive sprinkler ordinance that requires A spokesman the Southlake Department of ggre p Public Safety said recently that the proposal the systems in any building with more than 500 could be up for discussion by mid-February. square feet ofs pace—commercial orresidential. During the last few years,the size of residential Gordon Robbins,Addison fire marshal,said he • structures in Southlake has continued to esca- believes that sprinklers are the most cost-effec- late. However, Fire Services officials are con- tive fire-prevention method available to home- cerned because sprinkler systems are not rou- owners.The average cost,he added,is about$1 (Rai finely installed in the larger structures. per square foot,and state law requires insurance , Other cities are also considering such meas- carriers to give discounts to homeowners who ures, officials said, and national fire statistics install sprinkler systems in their homes. support arguments in favor of sprinkler systems. Anyone who doubts the effectiveness of sprin- "Current data indicate that when a sprinkler kler systems,he said,need only look at national system is installed and operational in both corn- statistics regarding their use in commercial struc- mercial structures and in residences, the sprin- tures. This data reflects that of all documented klers are effective in extinguishing fires 97 per- fires in commercial buildings, 90 percent are cent of the time," said Garland Wilson, South- controlled with six or fewer sprinkler heads. lake's deputy director of Fire Services. "In early December there was a fire on the fourth floor of Addison Circle,one of our newest NATIONAL STATISTICS also reflect that apartment complexes.One sprinkler head knocked there are 85 percent fewer fires in residential down and then extinguished the fire.In fact,the homes outfitted with sprinkler systems, corn- young lady occupying that apartment was able pared to those without sprinklers. to return to her place that very night,"Robbins Considering the effectiveness of sprinkler sys- said. terns. officials said, the extra cost involved with installing them is a worthwhile investment. Mixed views "People should consider fire a significant threat to their safety," Wilson said. "Every one and a Not everyone remains absolutely sold on the half hours there is a fire death in our country,and merits of sprinkler systems,however. a residential fire is reported each 74 seconds. "I really need more time to study the different Those are negative figures which could be consid- sprinkler systems.Eventually I'd like to see the erably diminished if people began taking fire City come up with a sprinkler plan which satis- more seriously." • fies all of us who are involved with building and A recent Colleyville residential fire provided fire protection," said Bobby Harrell, who runs dramatic emphasis for Wilson's message.Although Harrell Custom Homes and has 20 years of eape- • no injuries were reported in connection with the rience as a builder. (lialue blaze.it resulted in damage estimated at$600,000, "When they go off inadvertently, water dam- including -175,000 in structure damage and age is unbelievable.The most important thing in $125.000 in damage to the contents of the home. a e is,obviously,to get the occupants out of the Johnny Collins, an investigator with the Col- leyville Fire Department,said he believes a sprin- , _ • NEWS CLIPPING Source: The Business Press DATE: Week of January 23, 1998 Southiake -_. a ,, plans .„....,...1 for450,00St fAnd to keep up with computer technol v, 1 ogy, tenants will have access to fiber op- industrial par s tics. .. I "Most of the businesses looking for this size space are computer driven,"Teesdale said. By KELU R000A ''>. " ; .' As far as design and amenities are con_ THE BUSINESS PRESS i cerned, Cornerstone is comparable to Jac Colinas office space, "but in a better loca- SOUTHLAKE—Genesis Capital Advisors" lion,"Spencer said. of Dallas plans to break ground in March' During 1997 the average gross office rent on the 450,000-square-foot Cornerstone per square foot in the Las Colinas urban cen- Business Park. ter totaled $26.47, and Northeast Tarrant Located at Crooked Lane, south of i County's average was$23.30,according_to Southlake Boulevard, the 43-acre master M/PF Research of Dallas. planned development will provide office. For warehouse space, M/PF includes showroom and warehouse space, said Lee' Southlake in its west D/FW Airport region. Spencer of Dallas-based Swearingen Realtjr' During the third quarter of 1997 warehouse. , Group,who is marketing the property with.; occupancy for the region totaled 93.1 per- Chris Teesdale.Cornerstone is immediately' cent occupancy and 98.6 percent occupancy west of Commerce Business Park. for flex space, such as office/tech and of- Phase one of Cornerstone calls fora fice/showroom space. 70.000-square-foot office/showroom that The average warehouse rent during third Lie may be divided into 7,000-square-foot in;- quarter 1997 was $3.34 for all of Tarrant , see CORNERSTONE on page 13. County, while the west D/FW Airport I region's average warehouse rents totaled �, CORNERSTONE from page 1 $4.33. f 'The.Southlake area has a good premium crements and three 30,000-square-foot, over the rest of the county for rental rates," dock-high warehouses available in 15,000- said Sean Hockens of M/PF. square-foot spaces which will be available Southlake's additional commercial-and in July,Spencer said. retail development go hand in hand, said Build to suits are also available and sites Kate Barlow of Southlake's economic de- are for sale,Spencer said. velopment office. "The market is crying for spaces in the "The development of this park adds to 1 10,000-to 30,000-square-foot range,"Spen- our commercial tax base and supports the cer said. "This park is for companies that area as a growth corridor,"Barlow said. want to locate in an identity climate." _ The park was designed to be flexible, Teesdale said. `The sites could go from 5 percent to 100 percent office,"Teesdale said. Other uses include office fronts with warehouse space in the back,he said. The park is class A industrial construc- tion and is located in a triple free port zone, he said.Cornerstone is also deed restricted, and plans call for the first phase to have red brick and glass facades. NEWS CLIPPING Source: Fort Worth Star-Telegram DATE: January 23. 1998 i eveloper plans to .bran .. the office close to home __ •_. n 'Southlake business porate heads and financial people Courtyard at Timarron -iomplex will be within who live in Southlake and Col- ` ,¢ - u 0.t_. outi,iakeBlvd. d walking distance of the the high-rise situation,the park- _ Timarron neighborhood ing garages,"Wouters said. ,; SOUTHLAKE Those people would be able to a - .t Yt. BY BILL W.HOR.'YADAY work"in a luxurious,parklike $6 S million, m "` Star-Telegram Staff Writer atmosphere similar to their Garde �.000 SgUaro t%Cl OUTHLAKE—The devel- homes,"Wouters said.What's a� buildings. 'i)oper of a$6.5 million office more,the offices will offer the it complex that will be built in a advantage of being near busi- continental Blvd.W. „ I. —'1'tmarron residential area wants nesses along Texas 114 in the — " bring home"people who Solana business park,he said. Ind about an hour each day The demand for Class A multi- ';; - -commuting to their offices. tenant offices in greater North- Mee• , I e 45,000-square-foot pro- east Tarrant County is tremen- '9t ject,known as The Courtyard at dous.According to M/PF ©_,;;15,—h....,-, '''''Timarron,is designed to offer the Research,a real estate research • -same amenities as high-rise firm with offices in Dallas,99 Star-TtltgfJm/DAVESEYMOI'R 'offices,yet be within a short percent of Class A space and 92 development could bring as -.' e—or even walking dis- percent of all multitenant space many as 170 jobs to Southlake. 9:r : e—of executives who will in Northeast Tarrant was occu- "More and more people who ,4. k there,said Tom Wouters, pied through the first half of work outside of the city they live 9a.vitae president of Grapevine- 1997. in want to work near their homes based Realty Capital Corp. With two to five tenants pro- to the point of where it's becom- 'We're'targeting attorneys, jected for each of the complex's ing a national issue,"said Kate doctors,software companies,cor- five buildings,Wouters said the Barlow,Southlake's economic L development coordinator. ' have been done without that kind "In a 1997 phone survey con- of effort." ducted by the University of North Located on 5 acres at the Texas,only 48 percent of 600 southeast corner of White Chapel respondents said they work in Boulevard and East Continental Southlake.If people like living Boulevard,The Courtyard at here,they probably like working Tunarron will be built in two here too,so it stands to reason we phases.The first phase is sched- will gain some jobs out of this." uled to start in February with Gaining approval for the pro- completion projected for July. ject was not easy,Wouters said. When the second phase is fin With the complex just yards from ished by February 2000,the corn- houses that typically sell for plex will consist of three 2-story $400,000,Realty Capital worked buildings at 9,900 square feet closely with Timarron Home- each ��square feet apiece. d two single-story build- owners Association to allay con- ings �rotes are expected to be cerns. "First,we assured them there about$18 per square foot, (1••• would be no convenience storeat rWatesters of$25to$26 dollars,compared with the corner.Then,as we workedfound in Las Colinas. typi- through.our first and second cally drafts,we consulted homeown- Although offices in each ers,City Council and planning building will average between and zoning,"Wouters said."I,n 1,500 and 2,000 square feet, effect,they helped design this some prospective clients have complex.Because of its location, expressed interest in entire build- this is a project that could not ings,Wouters said. L PAGE 14 THE BUSINESS PRESS WEEK OF JANUARY 16.1998 • - r,v Tarrant Countys largest industrial parks Ranked by building square footage • For AN 1997.98 Its,90 fo mow b.zpress.cam L ^-- Seems feet Test meet " Total m available/ west be Number of Rank Part nave,address feet Nnt/lease rate reseaden Major veers Owner Agent/photo auw{er' Stoat Southwest ladust►le Put ''0 v� f1 `-;'`"� ... `-sx'9 . ler' -�"- .,;;� �°"• -.� d`�" :ICf A`e lII0O261-0222,StotKArorlals 1. testMT�3 utl I7 014 ' ammo19WS tl- ...:'Voted.Bak. 1� .7 6407 700.i'kNSl •Dee"wkN.r;; . -•ram s•, �d [ FbYd G:d.�►.a /" only. . E = - • 9s21 , Alliance American.Airlines,Federal 2 2421 Westport Parkway.No.100, 13,282.000 I million/DND 1988/199B 61 E.pres.,8urlsngton Northern Millwood Mike Berry Fort Werth 76177 Santa Fe.Galaxy Aerospace. Development Corp. 224-6000 General Mills,Kraft Contrarian • 1508. 3. IIrt Ewplre;4130 Fleetwood. 6.91t1om 350.000/ I9f2/1995 76=• AMti Mattel.JoNuon a to err. ' CentrePort ,-B•CnaMF(214)6961700, Fart Werth B3.6544 _ Kaeklat Anrru:._.. ' Mann Inc. y•kelt Kriloorian 640•1700 SIa Flags awiness Park Dave Mdenon 261-0222. 4, West Tea..360;North Spur 703, 6.2 I SO,00a 1965/1996 380 Ada Hardware.General Motor, Multiple Scott A.**avian640-1700. South 1.30, f2.50.53.2S GATX.Hughes Mark Skinner.David Waken, Arlington 76011 Shane Clark 261-1031 Carter ludustrial Park - - - Mgr Mrevvltg Co.,ARwoorft, 5. 7300 South Freeway, - 5,946,330. .99,000/$3 19611997i 3 General Motors; • L en Ladd a D.Matt Graves Part Worth 7{W F9rs 8akds BakarJl .� CO' .332.7397 ' Ford!Creek Mideast Park Op.nSath Corp..Motorola, 6. West IJS and North Lae,Q0, 3.5 million 465,00033-S4 1985/1996 75 Coca-Cda Bottling Co.of Fort Woodb use Tien k is Fart Worth 76137 Worth,Hagpr Clocking Co., Development Corp. (214)855-6022 State Fawn Insurance Co. Mercantile Center - ieo 000/ - •• ' FAR.Diards,Bombay Ca, ': MerrardN • Brian Randolph 7. West 1.35 West at Meacham Bfulfiard, 1613 million 197S-97/1998 .17 `- Coos.Akbern&Egress, - Fort Worth 76117 • $330 NNN - n PCS • Farman LP 831-2121 • Mark le Industrial Park Scott Knkonan 640-1700 Bahr,Georgia PKifK.U.S.post South loop 820 North;West I.3S; 186,500/ Dave Anderson 261-0221 8, North Meacham M f1.75-57.50 erlevard, 2.3 million 1970/1997 100 office,Moody Marketing, Multiple David Waters 261-1031 Fort Worth Beiges Weaver Waiter Floyd 877-4433 SolanaIC ,F ., 3 .BIM FWrrt(e:::. 9. 9!Viggo Clrele,No.700, ' 2.2 trillion 0/S22.f21 19139/nth DND IBM Mapdre 'C''''''' far•. SeVthIake 76091. PI" y -', r' , •.' ,dui -41' PrO ?bow U,•�4'Cl96f-6634 •[,; . Blair Industrial 12.000/ Bell Textron,Mason Foods, Lloyd C Blair 10. 5617 E.Rosedale, 1.77 million f2-SS.5o 1964/1992 126 Glided Foods.Seville Industries Lloyd C.Blair 451-1010 Fort Werth 76111 • Riverhead Industrial Park U.S.Army. kssanssodd. ‘......r- • Grans FrttWrthi11 N 1.7 ' , s AT Multiple o e 6 1 -•--' ..4- . -. t .Serf e c : 2 'kY 4 :1v.LAeenPad Nile ; 1 _,'-• C''':.; Arlington Smith Industrial Park LTV Oil States Algoma Jim Maibach Blake Mortensen 12. 7000 S.Cooper St., 1.057300 56.00043 25 1987/1996 72 Hardwoods,See-Pro Inc. Peyco Properties Inc. 467-6801 Arlington 76017 • Oak Grave Bolaess Park , . Owen 04 13. Foram Way,Swath 1-3S West, 1,007.000'- 20,0001$4.7S 1976/1994 S0 H Toots.Skyline Induswles Mukkerwn owned 877.4433 Fat-Werth 76140;'.. ,t 1 .tbi t4 i' - ,_M / .a.a7r t:ti: Richland Industrial Park Southwestern Bell.Special $9,500/ Dispatch.Cummins Utility, E.L.Baker Jr.732-1211 14. Airport Freeway at Nandley-Ederville Road, 953,000 52.95-f7.25 1966/1996 16 pm American Supply, E.L.Baker Jr. Todd Burner 861.7725 Richland Rills 76118 Harm Packaging Midway Business Park 15. 74S7 Airport Freeway,, '86600o','-1(iiWMrNe 1972/1195-= BS Trsspwrr-Clrendrusr, Leonard Raprtlr. Jkn F •ord .. Part Worth 7{I10 '- t Pkss-teK lire Dyruan Corp 595-4177 - gat' .f . . 1-"tr. :"Se-;w. Sentry Industrial Park 35,000/ Galbreath Inc.,Grinnell Fire Peyco Properties Inc. Jken n Maibach.Blake Mortensen 16. Sentry Dr;:067 an/Seoth Main Street, 771,000 f3.15 1978/1996 25 Mansfield76 Protection.Brownfield Industries and owner occupied 467-6803 Parkway Distribution Caster { , Sat r : 17. sou S.arse'sfuchweet te Py.(:�� • s r J97S/N(i. 7 /'! Foods.Naebnei_. .AMB Mrk SkRkw David Walters,tuna Clark Artiness 76011 _ _I.'. -r tc•SU.f2.7v-. ,,cs i' ,- ;h*�iOMVlbutlon,Aatu DbgWkpOtl, t Y_•.fg..a'Krht'.: 261Io31.:F. - .o: �d� .7ur. .. -• --ate:- b ..,� - - Melvin Evans Wareh Summit Elec[rk,8ungee Foods, lvi Mkhxl Parish 18. S98 N.Beach St., - 700,000 DND/vries 1974/ongoi g DND Men Evru Fort Werth 76111 Banta,Canfield a Joseph 831-0371 Payee Industrial Park-157 _. Peyco PnbprtW Inc^ 19. 7000 S.Cooper St..,- 1 601.500 6.000/S330 1979/1992^ 3M Nicker no Hi Ford, r Ppur Tuba, a PropartW tree Mai Fes been•Bb ors ia Maoen Affiliation 76017 y, ,ti 1t , . rid own.etcuPNd 447.6803 : MSO Business Park DND/ Chief Adhesives,Tarrant County Janei Jones 20. 1906 SE loop M Po 10, 444,000 1975/II 93 Don Valk Fort Worth 76140 f2.75-SS MHMR Tarrant Medkat Billing 293-9606 NOTES:The leasing adorn kr Nord,RkMrsd kdutrYl Park.No.19 on hot mere¢cold not be raad.ad. -Airings)manumit,/the Source:TM leaded'aeon largest portion el Me part. r-Additional Solana addresser 7 VN.n Circle;7 Whir Girdle:I E.Kirkwood BMd.;14 Campus Circle. ganearchart Valerie E.Kowa DND-dial not diadem NA-not ppaobla Na-nor arawkle L NEWS CLIPPING Source: Tarrant Business DATE: January 19, 1998 (ii..... By THE NUMBERSHEALTH CLUBS _ I 7Ranked by number of members in Fit and Life BryaCenter in Road Tarrant County. 1-20Fort Worth 76132 Bally Total Fitness 292-8101 110 W.Campbell Road,Suite 100 Members:3,700 Richardson 75080 Locations: 1 (972)301-5950 Membership fees:$49 Members: 50.000 Monthly dues:$34 ' Locations:4 The Solana Club Membership fees:$50 Monthly dues:530-$40 2902 Sams School Road Westlake 76262 YMCA Metropolitan Fort Worth 491-4559 540 Lamar St. 2Fort Worth 76102 Members:2,900 335-6147 Locations: 1 Membership fees:$300 Members:21,100 Monthly dues:$85-$115 Locations: 10 --Maverick Athlefid Club _ - _. Membership fees:$15-$150 91919 W. Pioneer Parkway i Monthly dues:S29-$44 Arlington 76013 273-3348 Get Fit 1005 Skyline Drive Members: 2,500 Arlington 76011 Locations: 1 860-0424 Membership fees:$100 Monthly dues:$30-$40 Members: 14,000 Locations:4 World Gym Membership fees:$275 6080 S. Hulegn St.,Suite 500 Monthly dues:$19 Fort Worth 76132 Huguley Fitness Center , 292-6800 11801 South Freeway Members:2,000 sr Fort Worth 76115 568-3131 Locations: 1 Membership fees:Vary Members:9,000 Monthly dues:$17-$30 • Locations:2 Membership fees:$80-$120 Carter Rehab and Fitness Center Monthly dues:$34 1400 Eighth Ave. , Fort Worth 76104 Harris Fitness Center 927 6190 1301 Pennsylvania Ave. Members: 1,800 Fort Worth 76104 Locations: , 878-50505 Membership fees:$80,$395 or$495 Members:4,500 Monthly dues:$35-$45 Locations:3 Membership fees:Vary Ulti-Med Health Center Monthly dues:$32-$50 12Arli1001ngtonN.E.7Green Oaks Blvd.6006 Health &Fitness Connection 860-7001 6242 Hulen Bend Blvd.8 Members:750 Fort Worth 76132 Locations: 1 --- 346-6161 Membership fees:$59 Researcher: Meg Young 1 (iiiii Members:4,100 Monthly dues:$19-$24.99 Note: Clubs not responding to the survey Locations: 1 were unable to be included.24 Hour Membership fees:Vary Fitness is unable to break down its Monthly dues:Vary member numbers by county. i Source:The health clubs Non Business Jorensl,■y January 1422,1996•11 AmeriCredit searchingfor new headgi.fr rs site Sy TREY GARRISON Staff Whiter loan approved by Texas voters on Nov.2 , rtia r won't --Rapidly growing Ameri- —and sells the loans and related servicing (Ilime" Credit Corp.is scouring the western half rights in the wholesale markets. �I of the Wimples for a new, roughly Company executives reportedly expect ✓'' l ttl(.(ff)-square-bad facility. the home-equity arm to be a Mhm—a �l The Fort Worth-based subprime lend- large number of the projected new 1,100 I ing firm is in the early stages of a search employees will work in the home equity ' for a new headquarters facility to consol- lending division. idate its operations. In 1997,AmeriCredit saw a 101.3% d ` • aI 4 The company currently employs about jump in employees to the current number 900. but expects to hire an additional of 900. �r - >. I l 1.1181 employers by 1999 as it expands its AmeriCredit boasted gross sales of t home-equity mortgage division. S137.7 million for 1997, up 70 over C i'i* 1 • -- So far,the search has been concentrat- 1996.The firm had net income of S38.7 I 1 i ed in Tarrant County.the Mid-Cities and million,up 79.2%over 1996. t 8 western portions of Dallas County. AmeriCredit uses branch offices to Kim Welch,director of investor tel market its financing products. It has 85 a ` s i4.4' , :,• &•" lions for AmeriCredit(NYSE:ACF),con- branches and deals with more than 5,600 "-'''�q'+f, ':')�..t,,-' C .� e rtt«+r t + firmed that the firm is searching for a new car dealers. Fort Worth-based subpdme lender AmeriCredit Corp.Is outgrowing Its current headquarters. facility,hut did not provide details. "They arc at a very preliminary stage," said one source in the real estate industry 800 woLF CO M M familiar with the deal."They don't know _ whether they wand to build a new facility or redo an existing one. "Their needs arc undetermined.They might want to build a singular structure,or make it a three-or lur-building campus." While AmeriCredit executives arc We Can Save Your Business 10 25/0 gathering"site data,"another source close to the deal said the firm has a"strong On Your Local Phone Service. desire"to stay in Tarrant County. Tom Higgins, director of economic development for Fort Worth, said any 1,000-employee company is"very impor- tant to our economy,and we'll fight hard" to keep them. "They haven't approached us or the chamber,but we take something like that very seriously."Higgins said."We'll work with them to keep those jobs in Fort Worth." /411111 (111111101 According to a number of developers who have been approached by Ameri- Credit's real estate search team,the new facility would house about 2,000 employ- ees,primarily working in loan servicing 1111111011111Si or customer service,both for the compa- ny's automobile and home-equity loan divisions. Arledge/Power Real Estate Group of Dallas is working in conjunction with The Richard Minker Co.of Fort Worth as broker during the site search,according to — o ,LoieF. Arledge/Power principal Susan Arledge. Carter&Burgess Inc.,a Fort Worth- based architecture and engineering firm with offices in Dallas,has been selected as project architect. AmeriCredit wants to move in by mid- COMMUNICATIONS 1999,sources said. Founded in 1988, AmeriCredit rolls Providing Businesses The Finest In the dice on car buyers with risky credit. Through its subsidiary AmeriCredit Local Telephone Service Financial Services, the company buys loans made by independent dealers to shoppers buying new and late model . automobiles AGTO4 i It targets consumers who have had past s credit trouble or other credit limitations. Funding for AmeriCredit's auto lend •- ing activity is obtained primarily through ., the sale of loans in securitization trans- actions. �. The firm services its auto lend- - t3ltapdAmCAtIONg ing portfolio at regional centers using • automated loan servicing and collection ( " ' systems. In November 1996, AmeriCredit 214 / 747 5200 acquired its AmeriCredit Corp.of Califor- nia unit,formerly Rancho Visia Mortgage i Dallas-llasrJ liie.iocs.c Corp. AmeriCredit Mortgage Services originates home-equity loans—a type of ' L, #c= 3A-4At"*'..— 4'.4x "l'.,s --'.��'�r'�r.-r #ti....=7ti+,�.,i*+u:r�w"M-am��:wo 0K. c c I Source. Nation's Cities Weekl} Date: li 19 98 Page I of 3 III1 i Ni EPA Proposes Stormwater Regs Affecting 3,500 Local Governments by Card Kocheisen On January 9, 1998 EPA for- mally proposed new regulations for 3,500 local governments to control pollution from municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). The proposed new regu- lations will apply to all cities with populations of less than 100,000 located in urbanized areas of 50,000 or more. EPA is also encouraging states to review the appropriate- ness of applying the program to cities outside of urbanized areas which have over 10,000 popula- tion if the population density is 1,000 persons per square mile. The proposal, known as the Phase II Stormwater program, will be finalized and promulgated on March 1, 1999 and go into See page 4,col. 1.::- -4 v1.... w.; ,,is.. .'+F y,�y .4Z,4y ._..: z'9;.. .?:. A. ..��'._:. •.+r r• ti:vT.. b''�i %wRa ,..43 +TI +,.A::aa:`6.'+sS .l f ',2.._ •, d::;?:'>,..NEWS CLIPPING Cr Source: Nation's Cities Weekly Date: 1/19/98 Page 2 of 3 Stormwater from page I effect in May 2001 with the municipal operations. complying with these new expectation that the 3.500 or At least one strategy for each requirements,EPA also proposes more newly-covered local gov- of the six minimum measures to develop, and is encouraging ernments will be implementing would be required. Unless a del- States to do likewise, a tool box a stormwater management pro- egated State(i.e.,a State that is of Best Management Practices gram by 2007. authorized by EPA to administer (BMPs)from which local govern- The regulations — which the Clean Water Act and issue ments can select appropriate were developed with significant permits) has developed a list of implementation practices. EPA input from a large and diverse "regionally appropriate, cost- is also encouraging intergovern- Federal Advisory Committee effective"(at least in the State's mental cooperation by authoriz- (which included NLC) — are judgement) practices, cities ing larger cities to implement expected to be significantly less would have the flexibility to appropriate(or entire)stormwa- costly and complex than the reg- select which strategies they ter management requirements ulations EPA developed for the would implement and to revise for neighboring smaller cities nation's larger cities (those with their selections during each five and towns where mutually populations over 100,000) in year period. Thirty-eight States agreed upon by the affected gov- 1990. have delegated authority to ernments. EPA is proposing to require administer the Clean Water Act; In addition,the proposed reg- newly-covered local govern- cities in the remaining States ulations suggest that States ments to implement six mini- will be permitted directly by take an active role in developing, mum measures,selecting appro- EPA and where appropriate,dissemi- priate strategies for each mea- In developing the proposed nating,educational materials for sure from"tool boxes"developed regulations for the nation's the public;in providing local gov- by EPA and the States. The six smaller cities and towns, EPA ernments with the necessary minimum measures are: attempted to redress some of the tools and authorities to imple- •public education on the difficulties encountered by the ment the program; and where impact of individual action[s]on larger municipalities which have feasible, providing financial the quality of stormwater run- been required to implement a assistance to local governments off(e.g.,the use of pesticides,fer- stormwater program (Phase I in the implementation of the tilizers, etc. on lawns; improper communities) over the last five program. disposal of wastes, such as left- years. For example,rather than On the negative side, EPA is over paint or the contents of requiring individual National proposing that States impose pooper scoopers, in storm sew- Pollutant Discharge Elimination numerical effluent limits on ers); System(NPDES)permits which stormwater discharges in the •public involvement and par- cost the nation's larger cities an ' context of developing Total Max- ticipation, as required by State average of$650,000 per permit, imum Daily Loads (TMDLs - a or local law, in the development EPA will, and is encouraging quantitative assessment of of the local stormwater program; delegated States to,issue gener- :-watei quality problems and con- •elimination of illicit dis- al permits. To obtain a general tributing pollutant sources spec- charges (both illegal dumping NPDES permit, a municipality ifying the amount of a pollutant and illicit connections to storm- would file a Notice of Intent with that needs to be reduced to meet sewers); the permitting authority (either water quality standards and allo- •controls on construction EPA or the State)that it intends cating pollution control responsi- activities (erosion and sediment to comply with such a permit, a bilities among pollution sources control as well as good house- significantly simplified and sub- in a watershed) for their keeping practices at the con- stantially less costly process for impaired waterbodies—require- struction site); obtaining stormwater permits. ments anticipated to be imposed •post-construction manage- Second. except under certain within the next two years.At the ment of wet weather run-off in circumstances, EPA's policy is same time,EPA states in the pre- new development and redevelop- recommending that numerical amble to the proposed stormwa- (iimL ment;and, effluent limits not be included in ter rule, that"neither States nor •implementation of good stormwater permits. EPA have the money, time, or housekeeping measures for To assist municipalities in other resources to create and '. �'.^r r,.,,.-.r-.y'k_,,�tS� :a-- _, „!.'�,C,.,x:k+'.-.- ..+v._:.,:;- ,';ist►AL's.�;,.s.. .. �},_ ' ..,,�'. 1....'.,.}:.: :...} :.$•`,'..-. - ^. 3 _ .. NEWS CLIPPING Source: Nation's Cities Weekly Date: 1/19/98 Paae 3 of 3 .. expeditiously implement a pro- exempted from the stormwater gram that depends on establish- program requirements. ing cause and effect linkages The proposed regulations do between particular land use little, if anything, to amend the activities and specific water qual- Phase I stormwater program for ity problems." In other words, the nation's larger cities (those since local governments and with populations over 100,000). industrial sources are required to Confronted with new and untest- comply with enforceable permits, ed mandates,these communities they will bear the full burden of tried unsuccessfully to have their reducing any and all pollutants requirements revised to reflect affecting a specific waterbody or real world circumstances and waterbody segment in a water- attainable objectives. shed, regardless of the source of While EPA had drafted an such pollutants. economic analysis of the costs of The issue of numerical limits the proposed stormwater regula- is significant to all cities,since at tion, municipal members of the the present time there are no Federal Advisory Committee known management practices or challenged its accuracy and strategies,including construction validity at a meeting with the of treatment facilities, that are Office of Management and Bud- demonstrably effective in meet- get. Consequently, EPA is cur- ing effluent limitations for rently revising the analysis. stormwater runoff Both NLC and the State Cities and towns will also be Municipal Leagues have lists of required to map their storm sew- cities required to implement the er systems and identify major new stormwater program. In outfalls, a potentially costly addition, EPA will be holding requirement. In addition,States regional meetings to receive ver- and/or EPA will in all probability bal and written comments on impose monitoring requirements the proposal: Feb.23,Washing- on cities to determine both the ton, D.C.; Feb. 25, Boston, MA; level and types of pollutants in Feb. 27, Atlanta, GA; Mar. 2, stormwater runoff and the Chicago, IL; Mar. 4, Dallas,TX; impacts of controls on these dis- Mar.6,San Francisco,CA. Corn- charges. ments on the proposed rule are The minimum measure with due by April 9, 1998. City ofi- respect to development aril rede- cials are strongly encouraged to velopment activities will prohibit read not only the proposed rule such activities from having more but also its accompanying pre- than a 20 percent impact on the amble. The preamble, in addi- rate of stormwater runoff into tion to explaining the proposed receiving waters,a provision that rule,also raises issues and alter- is likely to affect local land use native strategies on which EPA planning activities. is seeking comment.■ EPA is also proposing to require so-called municipal Details: The proposed rule "industrial" facilities (e.g. recy- and preamble are in the Federal cling facilities,transit operations. Register(Vol.63,No.6,pp. 1536- C sewage treatment plants) to 1643,Jan. 9, 1998), and can also obtain a separate stormwater be accessed at permit by August 7,2001. These WAIS.access.gpo.gov on the facilities had been temporarily internet. NEWS CLIPPING Li _ Source: Dallas Morning News (Business) Date: 1/11/98 Page 1 of 3 Judge Joe Kendall,a former police officer and } prosecutor, proved he wasn't "a rubber stamp . '' for the government"with his ruling Dec.31 declaring sections . _ of the -Telecommunica- , lions Act of 1996 • unconstitutional. - ,''r, •Morn*Hews i photo • Judge steers maverick course Ruling striking down part of telecom act upends industry By Richard A. Oppel Jr. prosecution lawyers. Staff Writer of The The DaUb Morning News Indeed,attorneys who regularly practice before the Before he turned the telecommunications industry 43-year-old jurist say they weren't surprised by his New upside down last month, U.S. District Judge Joe Ken- Year's Eve ruling that declared unconstitutional the , dall was best known in Dallas for handing out stiff sections of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 ; sentences to a ring of Carter and Hillcrest high school that keep San AToniAased SBC Communications Inc. thieves while he was a state judge in 1989. and other Baby Bells out of the long-distance business. In that case, Judge Kendall seemed to confirm to Whatever the legal merits of Judge Kendall's deci- critics his background as a former street cop and a sion—many government and legal experts'predict a tough prosecutor.But to many lawyers and judges,the swift reversal—if upheld,it would allow SBC's South- Carter-Hillcrest episode—which Judge Kendall later western Bell Telephone Co.and the other Baby Bells to referred to as his'albatross"—masks an eagerness to offer long-distance service in their home regions for challenge the arguments of government and Please see JUDGE'S on Page 2H. . 'l NEWS CLIPPING Cr,Source: Dallas Morning News (Business) Date: 1/11/98 Page 2 of g 3 Judge goes distance for Bells in rul ing n strikingdown of telecompart act Continued from Page 1H. quickly than in Dallas. the first time since they were divested by 'This judge is known for being fast, he AT&T Corp.in 1984. doesn't sit on things,and he moves his docket Disclosed late in the afternoon of Dec. 31, along,'said Jim Ellis, SBC's general counsel. the decision angered government regulators, 'That's why we went there." the Clinton administration and long-distance A ical rise providers such as AT&T—all of whom intend typ to appeal.It also prompted clichés about"may- Judge Kendall's rise to the bench was crick"Texas judges and speculation that SBC quick,but followed an atypical route for a fed- filed its lawsuit in out-of-the-way Wichita Falls eral judge. precisely because the company knew the case After growing up in Pleasant Grove,an 18- would be handled by Judge Kendall: The year-old Mr: Kendall signed on as a Dallas judge,splitting his time with his courtroom in Police Department cadet in 1972 and spent six Dallas, is the only federal judge in Wichita years on the force while finishing college Falls and hears all of the cases filed there. classes at Southern Methodist University. He For example,Mark Rosenblum,AT&Ts vice quit the police department just before becom- president of law and government affairs,said ing a sergeant to attend law school at Baylor last week:"I do give SBC credit for being cre- University. Later he worked as a Dallas ative [in crafting its legal strategy],although County prosecutor. I'm not so sure it's on the legal scholarship Not yet 33,he was elected a Dallas County side so much as it is in doing the research and state district judge as a Republican in 1986. figuring out a good division of a district court During the next six years, appeals courts which to file a complaint like this. would reverse him just three times. ;r Royce Caldwell,SBC's operations president, In 1992,President Bush,acting on a recom- says he's not surprised opponents Would seek mendation fromRepublican Sen.Phil Gramm, tot caricature Judge Kendall. "It think it's in• nominated him for the federal bench. Yet their interest to picture him this way,"b.says. Judge Kendall also rec eived:a strong endorse- And he notes with interest that he can't ment from former U.S. Rep. John Bryant, D- recall similar comments about the St. Louis Dallas, a hard-nosed progressive who usually federal appeals court judges who sided with didn't find a lot to agree with Mr. Gramm the Bells last year and threw out Federal Com- about. munications Commission rules governing Lawyers and judges describe Judge Kendall local-phone competition. as animated and assertive.He freely questions don't know that they pictured them as a some witnesses and,some lawyers say,appears bunch of handpicked bumpkins, too," Mr. more vocal and involved in trials than other Cadwell said. judges.They also say he can be very testy with SBC executives say they decided to file lawyers he believes are ill-prepared, or are their lawsuit in Wichita Falls after research making poorly reasoned arguments.Through shovdtd they could get_a ruling there more questions and(ther comments in court, they C r l • NEWS CLIPPING L., Source: Dallas Morning News (Business) Date: 1/11/98 Page 3 of 3 say,he sometimes gives jurors a good idea of wouldn't believe the deputy. He didn't, Mr. requiring the Baby Bells but not other phone whose testimony he believes and whose he Larson said. doesn't. companies to meet a strict 14point checklist Surveying attorneys one year ago, Texas Attention getter before they can offer long-distance service,is unconstitutional. The law, Judge Kendall Lawyer magazine said that while law yers don't The judge has gained attention while mak- declared, penalizes the Baby Bells without think Judge Kendall favors prosecutors, his ing short shrift of government claims in a giving them a fair trial. judicial style strikes some as that of'a tough number of other cases. "The court can reach no other conclusion guy on the bench who still acts like he is car- Last year,he dismissed for the second time than that Congress ... intended to punish rying a gun and wearing a badge." federal charges against former Dallas banker the [Baby Bells] for their former parent In contrast to the rude shock SBC's compet- Bernard Schuchmann,citing insufficient evi- AT&T's transgressions over two decades ago itors received last month,a number of Dallas dence. In 1995, prosecutors had won a new or for crimes yet to be committed," he defense lawyers say Judge Kendall has been, indictment of Mr. Schuchmann after Judge concluded. as one put it,a'pleasant surprise." Kendall had thrown out his 1993 conviction on Critics of the ruling note that before the Even attorneys who describe themselves as conspiracy charges. federal law was passed in 1996,the Bells were left-wingers or card-carrying members of the But after a seven-day trial, the judge dis- even further away from being able to compete American Civil Liberties Union say they are missed Mr.Schuchmann's fraud charges, this in long-distance because of a court decree that Cc able with,or in some cases even look time taking action before the jury started would have kept them out of the business f to,trying cases before him.His police deliberating so prosecutors couldn't appeal indefinitely. cution background is no worry,they his ruling. They say the ruling would disable the fed- say. •In another noted case,in 1995,he awarded a eral law's carefully crafted and balanced "He's got a great judicial temperament,and woman$2 million after she filed a civil rights scheme to let the Bells into long-distance only he's street smart.Most judges,I wouldn't have lawsuit alleging that Archer County Sheriff after competitors have made progress wading these kinds of comments about," said Frank Presley Lamar Pippin raped her soon after she into local-phone markets that so far have seen Jackson, a leading Dallas criminal defense had shot and wounded her husband. very little competition. lawyer. Mr. Jackson describes himself as "to Separate grand juries later declined to "We have a telecom act that is currently the left of [Marxist revolutionary] Che Gue- indict the woman for the shooting,citing self- not operational." AT&T chief executive C. vara, but I still like people like Joe Kendall defense, but also didn't indict the sheriff. At Michael Armstrong said last week. "The because they're fair." the civil trial, however, Judge Kendall industry and the government need to step Doug Larson,a Mesquite lawyer and expert decided the sheriff was lying when he back in the midst of all this and discuss alter- on civil rights litigation who has both aemerted that the two had merely had consen- natives to accomplishing opening markets, defended police officers and sued police sual sex. having choice and creating local departments, said of Judge Kendall: 'He 'Contrary to the sheriff's belief,"the judge competition.' doesn't like to play around with formalities. concluded,="The court finds that whew a = Of course, to those familiar with Judge He likes to get to the guts of the case as quickly woman says,'No,'it means,'No.'" Kendall's willingness to go against the as he can and not play lawyer games." Then there's his controversial New Year's government's grain, the ruling was hardly a Mr.Larson recalled that in a case in which Eve ruling. Invoking a rarely used legal con- surprise. his client alleged she was beaten by a sheriff's cept that bars what is known as a 'bill of Said state appeals court Judge Ron Chap-deputy,he didn't hesitate to opt for a nonjury attainder," Judge Kendall endorsed SBC's man,a Democrat:"He's not a rubber stamp for trial because he was confident Judge Kendall argument that the 1996 federal telecom law,by the government.' c a NEWS CLIPPING 'L Source: FTW Star-Telegram (Northeast Tarrant) Date: 1/25/98 Page 1 of 3 Quality schools, thriving cjtie s Education system's influence felt far beyond the classroom The first in a yearlong series examining issues in education. settle for a less-than-perfect house and pay more for it BY CHRIS VAUGHN for schools.On that there is no compromise." % Star-Telegram Staff Writer Saying that quality public schools is important is The houses are important. Prices and neighbor- stating the patently obvious,particularly to any par- hoods are crucial, too. So are work opportunities, ent. But beyond the significance of educating chil- crS crime,location,libraries and streets. dren,school districts play a vital role in determin- r But one thing almost always trumps them all as a ing whether a community thrives. Conmiun ties factor in where a family decides to live—the schools. Schools, as much as any other factor, fuel "Schools are the No. 1 thing I'm asked about,"said (More on SCHOOLS on Page 19) WHY SCHOOL Paula Brittain, a real estate agent who sells homes >Hitting the books:Education series will tackle tough DISTRICTS MATTER throughout Tarrant and Parker counties. `People will questions about schools.Jim Witt,Page 1E NEWS CLIPPING Le Source: FTW Star-Telegram (Northeast Tarrant) Date: 1/25/98 Page 2 of 3 of the Fort ' From Page I Worth school " .� Middle schools 21 ; 1 growth patterns in Tarrant County, district according to experts in development - 'r .4,?�s3 High sehoo 12..-.f I and urban affairs.Good schools -� - Tolaf generally bring population and busi- •. :'' 111 ness growth,a healthy tax base,ris- Tbtnsit-- e• :+•,, ing property values and a better $1.4i/pvS1 `+ quality of life. Bad schools,on the ee11eeee1 - • NPR Karel ether hand,can discourage business pM growth.hamper home sales and taint ,-`it, , 57 Awont plaid al UT*Isis 9^�i6na: a community's image. t grade!w State 97 and 10 In this,the families of North and 10(state image a swag!!score Texas—those with children and _ is73.2 perant passing) Is 997 ;r those without,chase in Fort Worth, Mate Pretikleva Arlington,Keller or` e — 'c are inextricably together. 'The quality of the school system r ?warnAver�pe yeas Teacher/NO can make or break a city,"said ,*mar surf, ae:perbnu rano Michael Casserly,executive director a 4,2e2 !."il,ttil 11 18.7 of the Council of the Great City " Schools in Washington, D.C., a ''t •;• ' 79,992 coalition of the nation's largest 'Otlia24% 75,t,39Jt, school districts."It is very difficult to maintain a healthy city of any size ,Earallment la past lire years unless its public school system is in 72,34e good shape„ -• in Tarrant County, perhaps no 7S,242 single school district wields more 19.4n influence on the area's future—and concerns leaders more—than Fort worn Worth's. 1 199196 1996 96 19lIB 97 1997-96 . Der to dal The Fort Worth school district, the county's largest, has almost w.rT.ba..,NtwnxR morn., 77,000 students,including high con- centrations of disadvantaged chil- serve about the same number of stu- news for gang problems than for its dren and a history of below-average dents as Fort Worth.Although Fort academically rigorous programs. test scorGc Worth has annexed land to the north "People who aren't from here It is also saddled with the to expand its tax base into the fast- know Fort Worth has muse- moniker of an "urban"district, rm n e hal which for manymiddle-and ��g Alliance�� urns and a great performance hall upper of new subdivisions there,such as and Van Clibum and all that,but do income people conjures up images Sum merfields,send their children to they know anything about the of big-city districts with bigger Keller wheat schools?No,"said Elaine Klos,a problems,such as the racial divi- Experts,such as University of school board member in Fort Worth slow and corruption in Dallas or the Texas at Arlington professor Paul and vice chairwoman of the Tarrant crumbling school buildings of Glint,say the growth of suburban County Workforce Development Washington,D.C. districts doesn't necessarily mean Board.'That has been our fault" Many in local government and ,-"le are leaving Fort Worth and CertainlJt,land availability and business circles believe that much of a ,,: ,Rather,it reflects the many proximity to Dallas/Fort Worth Air- the phenomenal corporate and resi- people who move from Denver,San port are factors in the explosive dential growth in Arlington.Keller, Diego,Houston,Detroit and other growth of communities between Grapevine,Southlake,Lewisville. cities and never consider putting Fort Worth and Dallas. But Walt Mansfield and other communities is their children in Fort Worth or Dal- Sosnowski,a senior consultant with not just a result of those cities'sus- las lic schools. American Metro Stud DaI- cesses,but also a result of the prob- "This goes on everywhere in Y Corp.,�" las company that provides research lems—both real and perceived— America,"Geisel said. "lust the in the school districts of Fort Worth phrase 'inner-city school' — to home builders and developers. said good schools are often the and Dallas. 0000hhh, "it has hurt us when we have : biggest factor in igniting develop- companies locate here and many of The Fort Worth district enjoys a mans their employees select the suburbs better reputation nationally among "Southlake is a great example of as a place to reside because of nega- educators than it does among local how the strength, reputation and tive perceptions of Fort Worth iSD;' residents, according to Casserly. quality of a school district can affect said Fort Worth Mayor Kenneth Although it is not considered an home prices and the pace and speed Barr,who considers the district crtr- "outstanding"big-city public school of development,"he said. kiwi cial to maintaining a vibrant city. system,such as Seattle's and Oma- A.rcputable school district often While enrollment in the Fort ha's.Casserly said the Fort Worth helps homes sell faster and sell for Worth school district has grown by school district is"very strong"and more,Sosnowski said.Realtors said 10 percent during the lattfour years, in a league with those in El Paso,! schools are even a top priority for creating overcrowded coixfitlons at Pittsburgh and Minneapolis. pks with grown children or no campuses such as Paschal High Among the district's strengths,he children,simply because the resale School, enrollments in the six said,are the vaiiety and diversity of value is higher. school districts in Northeast Tarrant programs,tough academic standards Brittain said she has clients"turn- County have expanded by 15 per- and strong management. As an ing down dream homes" in other cen* 7 example,several people pointed to party of Fort Worth to live in the Together,those districts now Paschal,which is more often in the city's Tanglewood area,where the NEWS CLIPPING Li Source: FTW Star-Telegram (Northeast Tarrant) Da te: 1/25/98 Page 3 of 3 - Norma st infant susuui Weu'te.t tp-ureu. ,�Q t advantage of all those opportu :: . ` `ttrr" ties,"said Catarina Wylie,a lasses WT'*117 17-18 ''of7, r,: woman for PritneCo. That poo • talent is already stretched thin. 6irdville 18,515 20,350 20,728 12% Carroll 1,921 4,799 5,384 1.79% not critical right now,but I do Grapevine- 8,706 12,006 12.875 48% ,.j 1 having a strong base in the Coneyville Grapevine- i 0 1 1 from high school on up is• H-E-B 18,693 , 19,118 . 14,327 3% 0• tH►- important for businesses like Keller 12188 13,779 67% -C'''''..-.,...3 _ i ; The business world,the F Northwest 3,178.,,• 4,513 4,689 48% ;� Worth Chamber of Comte and Total the Fort Worth school district have T0 - long had a relationship dategh Pro Good schools are a top .- Sams such as Adopt-A-School and reason that new residents • -1C-Cubed,which offers the business are rocking to Northeast - .:`` `" ,•.,J;; ` 21;" community a hand in building class Tarrant County.Its sod � moll . ' "' 1.01 1.50. curriculum In fact,such programs public school districts Q 1•05 1,54 are common all over North Texas nave welcomed 17,505 w. t new students since 1990. B 1.13 1.61 "It's altruism.J About two dozen AltBAir '`R'r: • 1225 r 1.50 You .but it's schools were added to -NOrtherest 1.35 • 1,68 • self-servin0 altruism,"Walters said keep up with growth,and of partnerships between schools and tax rates have inched upward to pay for the buildings, 76.752 COfFort Wo:1°s'rth city leaders,equally people and equipment 71,982 13'• 1• concerned about the future of the Tstai 89262 • school&Wet,have helpedincrease 64,167 66,769 r • y , '• ;. " the number of police officers in 59,247• • �z.. °:r, - i schools,discussed sharing facilities 0 A• r< _ .f - ,tsJs F'.�i and encouraged discussions with school district leaders. i ( fj �{ -s• u r+ 31 "You can't get a good education v. without a safe city.You can't get a ,sc,,„ 12.13 13'14 14_16 '1'111 '1•17 17.55 good education if you can't drive sr�v�x..t,D ,&men, down the streets to the school,"Barr said. neighborhood elementary school area with good schools,not only.to "I don't think you can say one is sports a 97 percent passing rate on find enough qualified people to lure. more important than the others. the TAAS tests and where almost a but.also to ensure that their employ- They're all fundamental to a suc- third of the students are in gilled and ees will be content enough to stay cessftil dry" talented programs. and raise families. Fast growth in surrounding corn- "said other clients moving to At Alcon Laboratories,one of the mantles eventually creates its own North Texas demand a new home in world's leading ophthalmic product r the Aledo school district,which was companies,with headquarters in far In Arlington,the grown among those given the state's top south Fort Wes,Vice President of school district has grown large educational rating of"exemplary" Human Resources Jack Walters said enough and diverse enough that last year,"even rho ugh they couldn't school districts in Tarrant County business tearer rs are striving to avoid fad it on a map if you were pointing have an immense effect on Akron's the problems that hobble most big- at it." and Deborah Kayhad never ability to teen*top scientists from m "We have a ty school fu l range of chat- other areas of the country. heard of � until they began He said Alcon has lost some lenges from a very diverse �- researching school districts before employees because of Fort Worth's sion op resident"saidf David ng on moving from upstate Bob's New.York ear- schools.And when others join the son._chambers,commerce. omen the Arlington Y year job n I^'' lompany,they face a long commute - ..while we do have some kets in What they found near the top was from_the communities where they of special datknges,as whole,the the choose to live. school district is than ,very strong." Carroll l9l schoolpercent district, , 5 where I have not seen a lot of people Sampson,who crcredt Arliing-•. betterents pass the oS tests.The pick up and move out of Fort ton school district for helping that Worth,"Walters said."What I will district is rated"exemplary"by the tell you is that many of the people in city r k�x. aid thirdnyrci y that state.In Fort Worth,by comparison, the sciences, the pharmaceutical canprove itethhas a qualityany s 57 percent of students pass the Y experts,the marketing people that urrh can write its own ticket,because TAAS tests and the she's designs_ we have brought in,do not live in everything else will fall into Lion is merely"acceptable." Fort Worth. live in Colleyville impor- They toured the district and the They rn "There is no issue more et.Arlington tant to corporate America than a their neighborhood elementaryd attend,schooll Many high-tech companies like well-educated, well-trained and eir daughter and looked over the mecurt PrimeCo Personal Communications, abundant work force,"he said."The teachers—all before theybought which located in Westlake in 1995. cities that have a competitive advan- riculumtheir home. g and semiconductor maker Intel cage in the future will be those cities Corp.,which is building a plant near that successfully meet the challenge (wisi "When you have children,they Alliance Airport in north Fort of educating kids." are your world,"Deborah Kay said. Worth,struggle to find employees "You want to make it the best you who are capable of performing tech • - can,and if you find a school district nical or engineering tasks.As , where you and your child are . you feel like �PPY' result.both companies are helping ?:'4n--?��:=? - r You're doing.the right develop curriculum for the Tarrant 5a pfOflk,0(, " -..,�" , thing." County Junior College system and u!e Uhlo flT11 .. +41 In much the same way,corpora- working with school districts like an academic audit it the. tions have 1 similar interest in public Northwest` Fort Worth school district. ,. schools.Businesses want to be in an "Not only are there tremendous •- 00 ON ON Q 00 irl 41 N 4-4 44 L I 4044) • • A S - 5 -faa) Q w c 4.2 d w czi w W ON i w .c U It OA T C6 i >4 .2..: V.) ,r) .-. E N @Q v . a E N Z a� eoUwY W1Le to i w oo � U `a)I- c53cc -� - w c b4' c o . (NI ° . 5 . E o o 0 r. ._ U a) U .� � OwA � Z Pt' I a — y Q w = CL) El c ° w E Ev ..1 0 0 U Q M _ 0 3 co E U r. U c4 E -� .. w g ° E � b4 0 3 o U a o = ,t = o U U @ O UO U w 7. 4-4 (h.„ •t4 cv E. § c:n 0., E •=,. a. rA R ,o b � w E E Ecr � oo0 .sz s M � 6 cn .n crl 14 � City of Southiake, Texas LMEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: CIP Status Report Attached are the status reports currently included in the City's Capital Improvement Program for 1996-1998. These monthly reports are in a narrative format which will describe the ongoing progress of each project. A graphical schedule of each project is also included which shows the current schedule with it's corresponding baseline schedule. These narrative and graphical updates will include the following: 1996-1998 Sewer& Water Infrastructure CIP Projects 1996-1998 Neighborhood Sewer/Street CIP Projects S.H. 114 Reconstruction Projects Miscellaneous Projects /sp Attachment: CIP Report 1 L MONTHLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE February 1998 1996-98 Sewer and Water Infrastructure CIP Projects SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE Project Description: Dove Estates Lift Station &Sanitary Sewer Improvements Discussion: Currently, the Dove Estates subdivision is served with sanitary sewer. This sewer flows to a small treatment facility where it is treated and discharged into Lake Grapevine. This treatment facility is a maintenance problem and requires daily upkeep. In order to abandon the treatment facility, a lift station needs to be constructed so the sewer can be pumped within a force main to the gravity sewer located in Lonesome Dove Estates. The design of this project is ongoing and should be completed by the end of February. The design of this project has spanned longer than anticipated due to expanding the scope of this project. This change involved analyzing whether other properties near this proposed sewer line can be connected to sewer via these improvements. This project was originally proposed and funded for the FY 1996-97, but because no improvements to this project can occur until the lift station at N. Carroll Ave. and E. Dove St. is abandoned and improvements to the lift station at Lonesome Dove Ave. and E. Dove St. occur, this project was delayed and placed in the FY 1997-98. The estimated design and construction cost is$170,000. L, 1997 1999 ID Task Name Duration JIJIAISIOINID JJFIMIAJMIJIJ(AISIOINID JIFIMIA�M�1999 SIOINID 56 Dove Estates Sewer 358d �' 1 i I 57 Design 110d 90°6 58 Review Plans 21d 0% 59 Obtain Right of Way 120d 60 Finalize Plans 10d o T o% 61 Advertise 21d o 0% 62 Council Bid Award 1d a 9/17 63 Obtain Contract Documents 15d o 0% I 64 Preconstruction Conference 1d Q 10/9 65 Construction 90d , , 0% Project Description: Crossroads Square Sanitary Sewer** Discussion: The City budgeted $125,000 in the FY1996-97 CIP budget to construct a sanitary sewer line from the existing lift station at Crossroads Square tot he existing sewer line at the end of Caddo Lake Drive in the Lakecrest Addition. portion of this project was approved and funded for the FY 1996-97. The original alignment of the sewer was revised due to the developer of the Shady Oaks Retail Center participating with the city. Under this new alignment, the portion of the sewer line from Caddo Lake Drive to the north side of F.M. 1709 was constructed. Due to the alignment change, an additional $50,000 is required to design and construct the remaining portion of this sewer line. The remainder of this sewer line is from the entrance to Bicentennial Park to the lift station located at F.M. 1709 and N. White Chapel. With the completion of this section, the existing lift station will be abandoned. The preliminary design for the remainder of this line is complete. The final design is underway. The anticipated completion date is the end of June, 1998. * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 1 1998 1 ID Task Name Duration D J;FIMIAIMIJ 1997 IJ1A1SI0{NTD JIF1MIA[MI JIJIAISIOINID1JfFIM'AIMjJ� 89 CrossroadsI Square Sewer 170 , f 111I 90 Design 100 0 35% 91 Review Plans 7 o TO% 92 Obtain Right of Way 0 <> ei3r3 93 Finalize Plans 3 a O% J 94 Advertise 28 - I 0% 0 95 Council Bid Award 1 O ;4/27 i 96 j Obtain Contract Documents 15 CM 97 Preconstruction Conference 1 O +15/19 98 Construction 15 J0% Project Description: Sewer Line Extension North on White Chapel to Bob Jones Park* Discussion: This sewer line is needed to provide sanitary sewer service to Bob Jones Park. The estimated design and construction cost is $244,000. The city anticipates having this sewer line engineered and designed in the FY1997-98 and constructed in the-FY1998-99. Therefore, $19,520 will have to be funded for the engineering costs for the FY1997-98. The design of this project was scheduled to be completed by the end of November 1997. However, the design has been delayed because the TRA lift station is not yet in service. The design will begin once the TRA--lift station is in service. The projected completion date for this lift station is February, 1998. 97 1998 1999 ID ITaskName Duration JIAISIOJNID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIA!SIOINID J . 100 I Bob Jones Park Sewer 188d Lae 1 101 Design 30d 0% 102 Review Plans 15d 0% 103 Obtain Right of Way 30d 0% 104 Finalize Plans 5d 105 I Advertise 21d 0% 106 Council Bid Award 1 d 5127 107 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% I i 108 ! Preconstruction Conference 1d /18 109 Construction 90d � � 0% ! Project Description: S-7 Sewer Line Extension* Discussion: The S-7 sewer line serves the southeast portion of the city. With the construction of this extension, the city can eliminate the wastewater treatment facility at Bank Place. This sewer line will also serve the commercial and industrial sites located in this portion of the city. The estimated design and construction cost for this project is $1,000,000. The city anticipates that the design and a portion of the construction will be completed in the FY1997-98 and the remainder of the construction to occur within the FY1998-99. Therefore, $500,000 is proposed to be allocated for the FY1997-98, and the remaining $500,000 to be allocated for the FY1998- 99. The intended completion date for this project is December 1999. L * Dt..ienates a new project ** Desivnates a revision to a previously proposed project 2 I 97 1998 j 1999 ID Task Name Duration JIAISIOIN[D JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISJOINID'JFFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINIDIJ 122 S-7 Sewer Extension 458d . 123 Design 90d p•b 124 Review Plans 15d ' , 0% • 125 Obtain Right of Way 150d p°6 126 Finalize Plans 5d TO% II i 127 Advertise 21d 041, 128 Council Bid Award 1d ;3/2 129 Obtain Contract Documents 15d , 130 Preconstruction Conference 1d 1 ( 3/24 131 Construction 180dpr i p% Project Description: Diamond Circle Estates Sewer/Streets Discussion: Construction is on schedule for this project. The sanitary sewer construction is complete and work on the streets has begun. Construction is scheduled to last until the end of March, 1998. • 96 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration JIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINIDIJ 23 Diamond Sewer/Roads 379d , i 24 Design 75d 100% 1 25 Review Plans 21d 100% 26 Obtain Right of Way 45d 100% 27 Finalize Plans 10d 100% Lie 28 Advertise 19d 100% I 29 Council Bid Award 1L 1 d O .9/2 I 30 Obtain Contract Documents 15d a 100% 31 Preconstruction Conference 1 d d /16 32 Construction 120d r _ r , 65% I I Project Description: Sutton Place Sewer (CDBG) Description: Construction began for this project on October 27, 1997. At least 60 days will be required to install the sewer main line. As you are aware, there is a second phase of construction which involves connecting the residents from their existing septic systems to the main sewer line. The construction for this portion is now in progress. 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration SIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID J,IFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIM 1 Sutton Place Sewer(CDBG) 300 , . 2 Design 60 100% H 3 Review Plans 21 10056 I I 4 Obtain Right of Way 60 100% 5 Finalize Plans 10 ;6 6 Advertise 28 100% I I7 Council Bid Award 1 9/2 8 Obtain Contract Documents 15 100% I 9 Preconstruction Conference 1 0 10/2 I 10 Construction 100 65% I L * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 3 (Iiir' Project Description: Dove St. Force Main (Lonesome Dove Ave. to Kirkwood)** Discussion: The first phase of this project was originally approved and funded for the FY1996- 97. The first phase will be constructing a 14" force main along Dove. St. and modifying the existing lift station located at Dove. St. and Lonesome Dove Ave. In the future, an additional 18" force main along Dove St. will be required in order to serve the subsequent development and the existing homes connecting to sewer. Therefore, instead of constructing the 18" force main at a later date and disturbing the area a second time, the city proposes constructing the 18'' force main at the same time as constructing the 14" force main. The additional cost is $361,000. of which $300,000 will be allocated for the FY1997-98 and the remainder $61.000 being allotted for the FY1998-99. The design of this project is around 85% complete. Approval was received from TU Electric in order for the proposed force mains along Dove St. to be located within the existing TU Electric easement along the north side of Dove St. Permission still must be granted by the homeowners for which this existing TU Electric easement is located. The utility easements are now being aquired. The expected completion date is February, 1999.I 1997 I 1998 _ ID TaskName Duration OINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMjJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIA) 45 Dove Road Sewer 605 , , i 46 Design 320 tliti185% 47 Review Plans 21 SI-0% 48 Obtain Right of Way 120 e % 49 Finalize Plans 10 1 p% 50 Advertise 28 0 0% 51 Council Bid Award 1 O 92g me 52 Obtain Contract Documents 15 I e,4 53 Preconstruction Conference 1 0 ♦1021 54 Construction 120 Project Description: 18"Force Main from Raintree Vicinity to Lonesome Dove Ave. Lift Station* Discussion: This force main will convey the sewer from the Raintree/Shady Lane vicinity to the proposed sanitary sewer line at the intersection of Dove St. and the future Kirkwood Blvd. The cost of this project is estimated at $648,000, although only $432,000 will be appropriated for the FY 1 997-98. The remaining $216,000 will be funded in the FY1998-99 budget. This project is in its beginning design stage. The preliminary schedule for this project is as shown below. 1998 1999 ID TaskName Duration AISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID:J;FIMIAIMIJIJIA;S OINID JIFI 78 Force Maxi from Ralntree Vicinity 515d ! ' - 4 79 Design 80 Review Plans 30d 0% I 81 Obtain Right of Way 150d 0% 82 Finalize Plans 20d 0% 83 Advertise 28d0% 84 Council Bid Award 1 d 70% 85 Obtain Contract Documents 15d I II % 86 Preconstruction Conference 1d 0% 87 Construction 150d , 1 L * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 4 L., Project Description: Lift Station Located in the Raintree/Shady Lane Vicinity* Discussion: This lift station will pump sanitary sewer from the Raintree/Shady Ln. area to the gravity sanitary sewer located at Dove St. and the future Kirkwood Blvd. The estimated cost of this project is $425,000, of which $318,650 will be allotted for the FY1997-98. The remaining $106,250 will be allocated for the FY1998-99. This project has begun and should be designed ahead of schedule. The city has recently purchased the property where this lift station will be located. The anticipated schedule is as follows: 1 1997 1998 1999 ID !Task Name Duration JJJIAJS[OJN[D JJFJMIAJMJJJJJAJSJOJN[D JJFIMIAIMIJJJJAIS'OJNJD 89 Lift Station a Raintree/Shady Area 440d -, , . 90 I Design 120d S 6 91 ! Review Plans 30d 92 J Obtain Right of Way 150d IP . _- 512% i l 93 j Finalize Plans 20d 0% I 94 Advertise 28d 0% CI 95 Council Bid Award t d , 0g% i 96 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ! a% cn 97 Preconstruction Conference 1d 0% i 98 Construction 150d i &In ,- Project Description: 18" Gravity Sewer Line from Mesco Lift Station to Proposed Raintree/Shady Ln. Lift Station* Discussion: This sanitary sewer line will begin at the existing lift station located near the Mesco property and extend along the Jones Branch creekway to the proposed lift station located in the Raintree/Shady Ln. vicinity. With the construction of this line, the existing lift station at Mesco will be eliminated. The estimated design and construction cost is $175,000, although only $116,667 will be appropriated in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. The remaining $58,333 will be funded in the FY1998-99 budget. This project is in its beginning design stage and will be contingent on the proposed drainage improvements along Jones Branch. The preliminary schedule is depicted below. 1998 1999 I ID Task Name Duration AlSJO[NJD J!FIMIAJMIJIJJAJS]OJNJD JJFJM[AJMJJ[JIA[SJOJNJDIJJFt 100 18"S.S.Line tom Mesco to Raintree 515d , 101 Design 150d 8% j 102 Review Plans 30d 0% 1 103 Obtain Right of Way 150d 0% 104 Finalize Plans 20d 0% 105 Advertise 28d .410% 106 Council Bid Award 1d 10% 107 I Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% 108 Preconstruction Conference 1d 10% 109 Construction 150d 0% i L * Desigtates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 5 (hip, WATER INFRASTRUCTURE Project Description: 12" Water Line along Continental to.Crooked Lane to S. Kimball to F.M. 1709 Discussion: Currently, the existing 12" water line along F.M. 1709 is fed only from one direction. With the construction of the above referenced water line, a loop with the existing 12" water line along F.M. 1709 with the 12" water line along Continental will be created. The alignment for this water line along Continental has been revised. The plans for this revised alignment have been completed and reviewed by the city. The city is in the process of obtaining the required easements for construction. The easement acquisition should be complete by mid- March. Construction is anticipated to take at least 180 days. 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration OJNID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIA 67 Continental/Kim ball Water 531 68 Design 240 1-i1C0% 69 Review Plans 107 1 1010°4 70 Obtain Right of Way 98 35% 1 71 Finalize Plans 10 I ! ! 72 Advertise 28 n I1111rollr 1 73 Council Bid Award 1 o I /9 74 Obtain Contract Documents 150°6 75 Preconstruction Conference 1 O �-/1 —� 76 Construction I 180 _ 0% 1 (we Project Description: 12" Water Line -Dove St. to Kirkwood Blvd.** Discussion: This project will provide water service to the 1BM complex in Solana as well as the future development along the future Kirkwood Blvd. This project was approved and funded in the FY1996-97 CIP budget. During the design process, various topography and development concerns led to revising the original alignment. The original estimate which was funded in the FY 1996-97 budget was $200,000. With the alignment change and the addition of certain valves and fittings. the revised estimate is $326,000. This additional $126,000 will be funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. Construction is ahead of schedule and should be completed by the end of February, 1998. I 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration 0© D J Q©0©01110©1•© D J C©0©0MICI©_'©CI� 56 Dove to Kirkwood Water WIIIIM 57 Design 60 100% 58 ,�100°.4 59 Obtain Right of Way 160 100% 60 Finalize Plans 10 - 61 Advertise 28 0 100% j - 62 Council Bid Award 1 d 9/25 - 63 Obtain Contract Documents 19 q 100% 64 Preconstruction Conference 1 a 10/2 . 65 Construction 120 90% . (PK * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 6 Project Description: 24" Transmission Water Line from Trophy Club to Ground Storage Tank No. 2** Discussion: This water line will provide a second main feed for the city from the City of Fort Worth. This project was approved and funded for $1,300,000 in the FY1996-97 CIP budget. This amount was estimated based on a proposed 20"water line. Based upon a water model study by Freese & Nichols, it was determined that a 24" water line was required in lieu of the 20" line. Therefore the project estimate increased by $211,000. For the FY 1997-98 CIP budget, $105.500 will be allocated with the remaining $105,500 budgeted for the FY1998-99 CIP budget. The design of this project is complete. The construction plans have been reviewed by the cite are being finalized . The city is also in the process of obtaining the necessary easements for this project. Thee .ected com s•letion date is the be:. ' t'': of Ai ril of 1999. 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration N D J Q©0©0EI0©H©EIEMI©0©BEI0DO©D J F M M 12 24"Transmission Water Line 537 13 Design 180 14 Review Plans Amu 50 100% 15 Obtain Right of Way 90 Imo 0% 16 Finalize Plans 10 ©: Lni% 17 Advertise 28 _Rim 0% 18 Council Bid Award 1 IIM 19 Obtain Contract Documents 15 II�0% 20 Preconstruction Conference 1 , 0, 4/20 21 Construction 240 , C'6 Project Description: "� 2 4Transmission Line from Ground Storage Tank No. 2 to Dove Elevated Tank** Discussion: The construction of this water line will provide a redundant source from the proposed Ground Storage Tank No.2 to the Dove St. elevated water tower. This project was originally estimated to cost $650,000 in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. The original alignment of this water line was revised in order to bypass Corps of Engineers property. Furthermore, the size of this water line was increased from 20" to 24" for hydraulic considerations. For these reasons, as well as for the purchase of the required easements, the estimated cost increased by $200,000. This amount will be financed through the FY1997-98 CIP budget. This project will begin in mid- March due to the time to manufacture the pipe. The expected completion date is the end of August, 1998. 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration NIP JjF1M , M 100 24"Ground Storage 2 to Dove 420 • 101 Design 120 •.0 102 ' Review Plans 30 103 Obtain Right of Way 30 104 Finalize Plans 6 i g}q'6 105 Advertise 15 12214 106 Council Bid Award 1 1140 107 Obtain Contract Documents 15 10% 108 Preconstruction Conference 1 12 7:4, 109 Construction 120 r * Designates a nevv,project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 7 L Project Description: 20" Water Line from FM 1709/White Chapel to Woodland Heights** Discussion: The construction has been completed and the waterline is in service. Project Description: 12" Water Line on Continental from Crooked Lane to Heritage Business Park* Discussion: This water line is crucial in providing fire flow for Heritage Business Park. This water line will also provide a loop with the existing water lines from Commerce Business Park and Heritage Business Park to the proposed 12" water line along Continental. The estimate for this water line $162,000. The preliminary schedule is depicted below. I 1998 1999 ! 1 ID Task Name Duration SIOINIO JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAIS C NI, DIJ IF!M 111 12"Line on Continental to Heritage I 295d lk . 1 112 Design 60d 0% 113 Review Plans 21d 0% 114 Obtain Right of Way 120d 0% 115 Finalize Plans 10d o 0% 116 Advertise 28d 0% t= 117 Council Bid Award 1d l 1O h 118 Obtain Contract Documents 15d o i3O% 119 Preconstruction Conference 1d poi 120 Construction 60d 1 0% Project Description: 12" Water Line on E. Dove St.from White Chapel to Carroll Ave.* Discussion: This water line will replace the existing 6" water line along E. Dove St. The engineering will be funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. The estimated cost for the engineering is $22,800. The funding for the construction of this line will be budgeted in the FY1998-99. The estimated amount for the construction is $262,200, therefore the total amount for this project is estimated to be $285,000. 1998 1999 i_ ID 2a o Task Duration O(NID JIFI I IAIMIJIJIAIsIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAIS N DI 122 123 Design 120d 0% 124 Review Plans 21d 9% 125 Obtain Right of Way 150d Deb 126 Finalize Plans 10d 0% 127 Advertise 28d 0% 128 Council Bid Award 1d 70% 129 Obtain Contract Documents 15d IOgb I130 Preconstruction Conference 1d Or �'i 131 Construction 90d 0% Project Description: 12" Water Line on N. White Chapel from W.Highland to F.M. 1709* Discussion: The current 12" water line along N. White Chapel is deteriorating and requires replacing. The water line will be designed in the FY1997-98 and constructed during the FY1998- 99 and FY1999-00. The engineering costs are estimated to be $22,800 and will be allocated in the FY1997-98. The remaining $262,000 will be funded as part of the FY1998-99 and FY 1999- 00 OP budgets. The preliminary design and construction schedule is on the next page. * Designates a nev,project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 8 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration FIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIM�AIMIJ�JIA 133 12 on WC from Highland to FM1709 340d 134 Design 45d 046 t 135 Review Plans 21d 0% I —� 136 Obtain Right of Way 150d 137 Finalize Plans 10d 0% 138 Advertise 28d 0% 139 Council Bid Award 1 d Doi 140 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% 141 Preconstruction Conference 1d 1I0% 142 Construction 90d rumwommi 0% Project Description: Miron Elevated Tank** Discussion: This water tower will maintain adequate fire flow and water pressure to the east side of the city's water system. The design of this project is complete and is being reviewed by the city. The original estimated amount for this project has increased from $1,560,000 to $1,710,000. This increase is attributed to required modifications to the elevated tanks at Bicentennial Park and at E. Dove St. once the construction is complete to the Miron elevated tank. These improvements total $90,000. Furthermore, a second floor in the tank shaft will also be constructed as part of the Miron elevated tank. This improvement will cost $60,000. The engineering and construction costs are divided equally between the FY1997-98 and FY1998-99, which amount to $855,000 each. This project has been designed and the city has reviewed the plans. The consultant engineer and the tank manufacturer will evaluate possible aesthetic qualities bein. added to the tank. 1997 1998 19 ID Task Name Duration D JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAJMIJ 78 Miron Elevated Tank 589 lib 79 Design 200 o% 80 Review Plans 16 81 Obtain Right of Way 0 82 Finalize Plans i 21 ' 83 , Advertise 6 • 84 Council Bid Award 1 3/18 85 Obtain Contract Documents 15 0% 86 Preconstruction Conference 1 4/9 87 Construction 270 L,__,o,,, 10% Project Description: 30"/36" Transmission Line from N. Pearson to SH 114* Discussion: As part of the Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water Supply (NETCREWS), the city has committed to constructing a 30" water line from Pumping Station No.1 along N. Pearson to Florence, thence along Florence to Randol Mill. At this intersection, the water line will increase in size to a 36"water line and will extend north along Randol Mill to the intersection of the future Precinct Line Rd. and SH 114. With the construction of this water line and the proposed 24" water line along S.H. 114, a redundant main feed will be accomplished from the City of Fort Worth. This line is scheduled to be completed in the FY2000-01. In order to accomplish this, the engineering must be scheduled for the FY1997-98. This amount is estimated * Designates a new project ** Designates a recision to a previously proposed project 9 (re to be $298,861. The remaining estimated costs will be appropriated over the FY1998-99. FY1999-00, and FY2000-01. The entire Iro'ect cost is estimated to be $3,733,516. n R1998 1999 2000 2001 111 ID Task Name Duration MUICEISEJ©D•©D J rihu0©EE0©C©C'Q©E►ZERQQ©Q©CION1uMBE0E'.©CEI 144 30"3"Transmission Line 820 145 Design • 150 0% 146 Review Plans 30 1111M=1: 1 147 Obtain Right of Way 360 0% 148 Finalize Plans 15 11111111L 0% _ --- 149 Advertise 28 _ 0% 150 Council Bid Award 1 d 0% 151 Obtain Contract Documents 15 =MIMI poi 152 Preconstruction Conference 1d 0% 153 Construction 250 0% Project Description: Pump Station No. 2 at T.W. King Rd.** Discussion: This pump station will provide water storage and distribution to the northern part of the city. The tank itself was approved and funded for the FY1996-97 for an estimated cost of $600,000. Along with the ornamental facade, which was not estimated in the original cost of the tank, and the increase in the bid of the tank from the estimate, there is a $400,000 increase to the project. The design is complete for the tank itself. Construction on the tank has begun. The design of the pump station for the water tank is still ongoing. Construction of the pump station will be delayed until the construction of the 24" transmission waterline begins. For the FY 1997- Coe 98 CIP budget, $2,110,000 will be appropriated and the remaining $400,000 will be funded in the FY1998-99 for a total estimated cost of the project of$3,110,000. 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration NID JIF1MIAIM j 111 Ground Storage 2 585 112 Design 280 ►_ 85°% 113 Review Plans 30 0% 114 Obtain Right of Way 0 115 Finalize Plans 20 160% 116 Advertise 28 Irmir 117 Council Bid Award 1 0% 118 Obtain Contract Documents 15 i 0% 119 Preconstruction Conference 1 110% 120 Construction 210 r 0% Project Description: Oversi. ing of 20" Water Line Through Town Center* Discussion: The current Master Water Concept Plan requires a 20" water line to loop with the existing 20" transmission line along N. White Chapel and the proposed 20" transmission line along F.M. 1709. The proposed route for this water line is along N. Carroll from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 thence along S.H. 114 to N. White Chapel. Due to the future vertical alignment of the proposed N. Carroll/S.H. 114 intersection, the city proposes to locate the section of this 20" water line from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 through the Town Center Development. Consequently, the oversizing cost of this water line will be refunded to the developer if this occurs. The proposed cost to be funded through the FY1997-98 CIP budget is S20,000, with the remaining * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 10 (we $230,000 to be funded in the FY1998-99 budget. The construction plans have been reviewed by the city. Project Description: Painting Florence Water Tower* Discussion: The Florence Rd. water tower is scheduled to be painted during the FY 1997-98. The estimated cost is $73,500. L (Irv' * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 11 (lkor- MONTHLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE February 1998 1996-98 Neighborhood Sewer/Street CIP Projects NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER/STREET PROJECTS Project Description: Shady Lane Area (Sewer, Water and Road Improvements)** Discussion: Originally, $1,467,445 was approved and appropriated for the FY1997-98 CIP budget. Due to expanding the original concept of this project, there is an increase of$458,550. This is attributed to providing sanitary sewer service for the residents north of the Jones Branch creek as well as building the ultimate culvert under Shady Ln. across the Jones Branch. The construction of the water lines will replace the existing undersized water lines. The design is complete for this project. Construction has begun for this project. Approval was recently granted by the City of Grapevine to allow a portion of this sewer flow through Grapevine's sewer system. An interlocal agreement is now being processed with the City of Grapevine. The street portion along with the construction of the culvert under Shady Lane will be bid separately following the completion of the water and sewer lines. 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration AjSIOlNID JIFIMjAIMIJIJIAJSlOJNID JIF 1 Shady Lane Water/Sewer/Roads 537 2 Design 75 100°b 3 Review Plans 21 100% I 4 Obtain Right of Way 210 -95% 5 Finalize Plans 10 1'100% 6 Advertise 25 © 7s1100% 7 Council Bid Award 1 O. ♦14/16' 8 Obtain Contract Documents 15 0% i 9 Preconstruction Conference 1 /7 10 Construction 210 20% Project Description: W. Dove Reconstruction from S.H. 114 to N. White Chapel Discussion: Construction of this project involves reconstructing the existing roadway. The widening of the existing cross-section of this road will be limited to 1 to 2 feet. Minor drainage improvements will also be constructed for this project. This project was originally approved to be budgeted for the FY1997-98 for an estimated cost of $150,000. Originally, this project was delayed in order to not risk damaging the reconstructed road during the proposed development along Dove. However, under the recently approved developer's agreement with Maguire Thomas, this project has been moved up to be constructed entirely within the FY1997-98. Therefore, the cost for constructing this project will be allocated within the FY1997-98 CIP budget. The following schedule on the next page has been revised to reflect these changes. L * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 12 1998 1999 (We ID Task Name Duration NovjDec Jan[Feb[Mar[AprIMaylJunfJul lAugjSepl Oct[Nov[Decf Jan[Feb Marl Apr!MaJuni Jul;Aug 89 W.Dove 114 to White Chapel 286d 90 Design 90d 20% . i 1 91 Review Plans 21d 0% r i 92 Obtain Right of Way Od 1fr= l vY 93 Finalize Plans 10d 0% 1 -~ 94 Advertise 28d 0% � d � --i 95 I Council Bid Award 1d ,6/26 96 I Obtain Contract Documents I 15d 0% o "--1 97 Preconstruction Conference 1 1d 7/20 ;1 ' 98 Construction 120d _jl 0% F Project Description: Huntwick Sanitary Sewer/Abandonment of Lift Station at Carroll and Dove** Discussion: This project has existing funds allotted. Due to a revision in the project, the project will cost an additional estimate of$92,000. This additional cost will be funded in the FY 1997-98 C1P budget. The revision includes abandoning the existing lift station at E. Dove and N. Carroll and constructing a new lift station near Quail Creek Estates. Construction of these improvements will provide sanitary sewer service to Huntwick Estates. All easements have been acquired and the project construction is underway. The anticipated construction date is the end of April, 1998. 1997 1998 (1110' ID Task Name Duration A[SIOINID J[F[MIAIMIJIJIAISjO[NID J[FIMIAIM[JIJIAIS[OIN[DiJIFi 12 Huntwick Sewer 331 I. 13 Design j 60 rr 10©°6 14 Review Plans 15 © t00S6 15 Obtain Right of Way 200 41,,, „ „,1 i F-100% f I 16 Finalize Plans 10 0 1100% 17 I Advertise 12 0 100% 18 I Council Bid Award 1 d 11/18' 19 Obtain Contract Documents 1 15 100pA 20 Preconstruction Conference 1 1 7t 12/23 21 Construction ; 90 I rimams 20% Project Description: Mission Hills Sanitary Sewer** Discussion: This project was approved and funded for the FY1996-97 in the amount of $368,000. The cost for this project has increased due to efforts to save existing trees and replace existing landscaping within the R.O.W. This increase totals $62,000 and will be funded through the FY1997-98 CIP budget. All easements have been acquired and the project will begin March, 1998. The preliminary schedule on the next page reflects an anticipated completion date by mid- August, 1998. (or' * Designates a ne«project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 13 L .-- � 1997 1998 ----_- ' ID Task Name Durat�� AlSIOfNID JIFIMIAfMIJIJIAISIOTNID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIA[SIOINID}J;F! 34 fission Hills Sewer f ' 1' 35 Design 75 36 Review Plans 21 100%-100% 37 Obtain Right of Way 130 J • 100 38 Finalize Plans 10 g 100% 39 Advertise 16 o, 1 0% 40 Council Bid Award 1 0 12116' 41 Obtain Contract Documents 15 © 0% 42 Preconstruction Conference 1 0 1/7 43 Construction 120 a 0% Project Description: Burney Ln. Reconstruction from N. Carroll to Lonesome Dove Ave.** Discussion: Construction of this project involves reconstructing the existing roadway. If needed, the widening of the existing cross-section of this road will be limited to 1 to 2 feet. Minor drainage improvements will also be constructed for this project: This project was approved to be funded for the FY1997-98 for an estimate of$129,400. Recently, we received an updated estimate reflecting the current construction prices and the estimate was $17,600 higher for a total of$147,000. This increase will be funded through the FY1998-99 CIP budget. The preliminary schedule for this project is depicted below. 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration OctiNoviDec JaniFeblMarlAprIMay�Junl Jul lAuglSepjOctINoviDec JanJFetiMardAprIMayjJun',Jul) L . 1 Burney(Carroll to Lonesome 226d 2 Design 60d 0% 3 Review Plans 21d0% 4 Obtain Right of Way Od i' I 5 Finalize Plans 10d 0% 6 Advertise 28d • [ 0% 7 Council Bid Award 1d 0 7/31 8 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 1=70% 9 Preconstruction Conference 1d 0 g/24 1 10 Construction 90d 0% Project Description: Love Henry Court Reconstruction** Discussion: This project was approved to be funded for the FY1997-98 for an estimate of $66,800. This estimate reflected replacing the existing asphalt roadway while keeping the existing concrete curb. Recently, we received an updated estimate reflecting the current construction prices along with additional proposed improvements and the estimate was $42,200 higher for a total of$109,000. These proposed improvements include replacing the existing concrete curb and existing asphalt roadway and constructing minor drainage improvements. This increase will be funded through the FY1998-99 CIP budget. The preliminary schedule for this project is depicted on the following page. L * Designates a nev.project ** Designates a recision to a previously proposed project 14 Lire _ I 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration OctiNovIDec Jan!Feb{Mar[AprIMayiJuni Jul lAugJSepl Oct iNov!Dec Jan I Feli Mar I Apr I Mayi Juni Jul 12 Love Henry Court 181d womesmit 13 Design 45dI r---milimmilli0% 14 Review Plans 21d � L-0°.6 I 15 Obtain Right of Way Od I 16 Finalize Plans 10d I 0% 17 Advertise 28d Q 0% 18 Council Bid Award 1 d I O 817 — + 19 Obtain Contract Documents 15d I cz3 ati 0% 20 I Preconstruction Conference 1 d I O 8/31 I 21 I Construction 60d' 0% I Project Description: Lake Dr. Street Reconstruction along w/ Water &Sewer Improvements** Discussion: This project was approved to be funded for the FY1997-98 for an estimate of $93,000. Recently, we received an updated estimate reflecting the current construction prices along with the addition of constructing a water line and sewer line along Lake Dr. -The proposed water line will replace the existing undersized water line along Lake Drive. The proposed sewer line will serve the residents along the east side of Lake Dr. The reconstructing of the road will include widening the existing pavement 4'-6' in order to obtain a continuous 22' wide cross section. The estimate was $76,000 higher for a total of$169,000. This increase will be funded through the FY1998-99 CIP budget. The preliminary schedule for this project is depicted below. 1998 I 1999 ID Task Name 23 Lake Drive Duration Oct jNavjDec Jan IFeb'Marl Apr IMay�Juni Jul lAugjSep]Oct I Nov IDec Jan IFet{Marl AprIMayl Jun I Jul 256d , 24 Design 60d 25% 25 Review Plans 21d ' 0% 26 Obtain Right of Way Od 27 Finalize Plans 10d 0% 28 Advertise 28d 0% 29 Council Bid Award 1 d 7/1 30 Obtain Contract Documents I 15d' 0% l I 31 Preconstruction Conference I 1d t7,/23 32 Construction 120d 0% Project Description: Pine Dr. and Lilac Ln. Reconstruction** Discussion: This project was approved to be funded for the FY1997-98 for an estimate of $234,600. The construction for this project will be removed from the FY1997-98 to the FY1998- 99 CIP budget. The engineering will be funded for the FY 1997-98 for the amount of$18,768. The remaining $215,832 will be funded during the FY1998-99. The preliminary schedule for this project is depicted on the next page. The construction of this project will include reconstructing the existing roadway. The estimate reflects widening the proposed roadway by 1 to 2 feet. (or * Designati a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 15 1998 i 1999 I ID Task Name Duration May�Junl Jul[Aug lSer4OctjNov Dec Jan[Fell Mar j Apr lMaylJuniJul jAuglSepl Oct;NovlDec JanlFeb! 33 . 34 Lilac/Pine I 330d ' . 35 Design 75d 36 Review Plans 21d 0% 37 Obtain Right of Way 90d rood 38 Finalize Plans 10d Ift 056 39 Advertise 28d 0% 40 Council Bid Award 1 d "4/29 41 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% 42 Preconstruction Conference 1d igh5/21 43 Construction 120d „�„ 0% Project Description: Harrell Drive Reconstruction* Discussion: Construction of this project involves reconstructing the existing roadway without widening the existing roadway. The existing drainage problems will be addressed in the design of this project. This project is estimated to cost $140,000. . For the FY1997-98, $11.200 will be appropriated for the engineering. For the FY1998-99, the remaining $128,800 will be funded for the construction. The preliminary schedule is reflected below. 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration May{Junl Jul lAug'Sep]Oct I Novi Dec Jan[Feli Marl Apr I May{Jun I Jul JAugfSep Oct Novl Dec JanjFeb 99 • 100 Harrell Dr.Reconstruction 271d 110, . i 101 Design 75d C% 102 Review Plans 21d CPA 103 Obtain Right of Way Od •1 104 Finalize Plans 10d 0% 105 Advertise 28d 0% 106 Council Bid Award 1 d 3/10 107 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% 108 Preconstruction Conference 1d 4/1 109 i Construction 120d 0% Project Description: Union Church and S. Pearson Reconstruction* Discussion: This project is estimated to cost $534,310. For the FY1997-98, $42,745 will be appropriated for the engineering. For the FY1998-99, the remaining $491,565 will be funded for the construction. If needed, the widening of the existing cross-section of this road will be limited to 1 to 2 feet. The preliminary schedule is reflected on the following page. L * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 16 L 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration May�JuniJulklAugjSepjOct[NovtDecJanfFeliMarjApr1MayfJun(JullAuglSeplOct'NoviDecJanIFebl 110 111 Union Church 8 S.Pearson 316d , 112 Design 90d u 113 Review Plans 21d 0% 114 Obtain Right of Way Od • 12 I 115 Finalize Plans 10d 0% 116 Advertise 28d 0% 117 Council Bid Award 1d ;i2/26 118 Obtain Contract Documents 15d0% 119 Preconstruction Conference 1d 3/22 ^—I 120 Construction 150d i 0% Project Description: N. White Chapel from S.H. 114 to County Line* Discussion: This project will be constructed as a cooperative project with Tarrant County. The city will pay the engineering and material cost and Tarrant County will provide the labor. The estimated material cost is $181,850. The existing cross section of the roadway will remain the same. This project is currently being designed. 1998 ID Task Name Duration AugjSepj OctlNovj Dec JaniFebi Marl Apr IMayfJunJ Jul lAugISepiOctINovf Dec Jan IFellMarlAprIMayl 122 N.White Chapel 280d + - 1 123 Design 100d iz....,. 30% 124 Review Plans 10d o 0% L : 125 1 Obtain Right of Way Od 0 �-J17 126 Finalize Plans 5d o 1 0% 127 Advertise 28d 0% 128 Council Bid Award 1d . 420 129 Obtain Contract Documents 15d o 0% 130 Preconstruction Conference 1d 5/12 131 Construction 120d 0% I Project Description: S. Kimball Extension from Crooked Ln. to Heritage Business Park* Discussion: The projected cost for this project $1,750,000. This project will be designed and engineered during the FY1997-98 CIP budget for $80,000. It will be constructed within the FY1998-99 and FY1999-00. These improvements include constructing a divided four lane portland concrete roadway. The 7reliminary schedule is shown below. 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration ApriM4JuniJullAugjSep!OctiNovlDecJanIFellMar1AprIMaylJuniJul'AugjSepjOctjNovjDecJan 132 I I 1 133 S.Kimball Extension 316d 134 Design 90d L . h0% 135 i Review Plans 21d .ill-i0% i 1 I 1 136 Obtain Right of Way Od •1! 137 Finalize Plans 10d 0% 138 Advertise 28d 0% 139 Council Bid Award 1d 3/31 L 140 Obtain Contract Documents 15d0% 141 Preconstruction Conference 1d 422 142 Construction 150d 10% j * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 17 LProject Description: Brumlow Reconstruction* Discussion: This project will be constructed as a cooperative project with Tarrant County. The city will pay the engineering and material cost and Tarrant County will provide the labor. The estimated material cost is $112,700. The existing cross section of the roadway will remain the same. I 1998 T ID Task Name Duration Aug[SepIOctiNov[Dec Jan)FebJ Marl Apr[MayJJun[Jul'Aug 1SepIOct[NoviDec Jan[FetiMarIAprIMayl 144 Brum low Reconstruction 225d r , 145 Design 45d a ,,,; 10% 146 Review Plans 10d co 0% 147 Obtain Right of Way Od 0 I /17 148 I Finalize Plans I 5d o 1- 0% 1 —� 149 I Advertise 28d 0% I 150 Council Bid Award 1d 6/18 151 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% 152 Preconstruction Conference 1 d 07/10 153 Construction 120d 0% Project Description: Year 3 Neighborhood Sewer (Jellico, Cross Timbers, Dove Acres, Hillwood Acres) Discussion: As part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program, sanitary sewer service will be provided for residents in Jellico Estates, Cross Timber Hills, Dove Acres, and Hillwood Estates. Le The estimated engineering and construction cost is $2,000,000. Due to the extent of these projects, $1,000,000 will be budgeted for both the FY1997-98 and FY1998-99 CIP budgets. 1997 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration MIJ[J[A[SJO1Nip J1FJMJAJM[J[JJA[ISIO[NID JIFIMIA[M[J1J1AISIDINI 34 Hillwood,Dove Acres,Jellico 435d 35 Design 90d 85%' 36 Review Plans 21d 0% 37 Obtain Right of Way 90d t—• 0% 38 Finalize Plans 10d' o T 0% 39 Advertise 28d © 0% 40 Council Bid Award 1 d 0 7/20 41 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ® 0% 42 Preconstruction Conference 1d 0 .-,8/11 43 Construction 210d 1 j� 0% 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration ,AJSJOJN[D J[F[MIA[MJJ[J[A[S[O[NJD_J[F[M[AIM[J[JIA[S[O[N[D J(F 45 Cross Timbers Sewer 480d , 1 46 Design I 120d( 85% 47 Review Plans 30d 0% 48 Obtain Right of Way 150d L ti„, ! —,,— ' I ©% 49 Finalize Plans 45d 0% S0 Advertise 28d , 0% 51 Council Bid Award 1 d /10 52 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% 53 Preconstruction Conference 1d L9p/154 Construction 240d * Designates a neu project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 18 LProject Description: Intersection at Peytonville Ave. and F.M. 1709* Discussion: The increased traffic congestion has warranted several changes along F.M. 1709 at various intersections. At the Peytonville/F.M. 1709 intersection, lane improvements are needed in . order to accommodate the traffic generated by the high school. The city has recently received an • estimated cost for these provisions, which amount a total of$570,258. The engineering will be budgeted for the FY1997-98 for the amount of $70,000. The remaining $500,278 will be budgeted for the FY1998-99 when construction commences. The preliminary schedule is shown below. 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration JaniFeblMarlAprIMayiJuniJul!AugiSepioctiNoviDecJaniFebiMarlApriMayiJuniJuljAugjSepiOct! 154 I 155 Peytonville Intersection 226d 156 Design 60d , 0% 157 Review Plans I 21d � 6% I 158 Obtain Right of Way I Od •..1 159 Finalize Plans 10d .. 0% 160 Advertise 28d 0% 161 Council Bid Award 1 d 8/14- 162 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% 163 Preconstruction Conference 1d 9/7 164 Construction 90d 0% Project Description: Intersection at S. White Chapel and F.M. 1709* (..... Discussion: The increased traffic congestion has warranted several changes along F.M. 1709 at various intersections. At the intersection of S. White Chapel and F.M. 1709, a third lane is needed on S. White Chapel for a left turn only lane. The estimated cost for this project is S225,000. During the FY1997-98, the project will be engineered and partially constructed. The project will be complete in the FY1998-99. Therefore, $118,000 will be allocated for FY1997-98 and $107,000 will be allotted for FY1998-99. 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration Apr[May{Juni JullAugiSepiOctiNoviDecJan1FetiMarjApriMaylJuniJullAug]Sep(OctiNoviDeciJan 165 166 S.White Chapel Intersection 166d , aa>♦ 167 I Design 30d 0% 168 Review Plans 21d 0% 169 Obtain Right of Way Od - 170 Finalize Plans 10d f.j 0% 171 Advertise 28d 0% 172 Council Bid Award 1 d 10/13 173 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% 174 Preconstruction Conference 1d 11/4 175 Construction 60d . 0% Project Description: School Road fronz Shady Oaks to N. White Chapel** Discussion: This project was originally funded for $90,000 for the FY1996-97 and $860,000 for the FY1997-98. Due to the priority of this project, only funding for engineering for the FY1997-98 will be appropriated and the existing $90,000 will not be used for this project. The * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 19 L. engineering costs are estimated to be $68,800. The remaining $881,200 will be funded in the FY1998-99 CIP budges t. The estimate reflects an undivided two-lane asphaltic concrete roadway. 1998 1999 ID Task Name I Duration AprjMaI Jun[Jul!AuglSeplOctINovjDec JanjFeti-MarlAprlMay4Junl JulJAuglSeplOctfNovjDeclJanl 176 177 School Rd.from Shady Oaks to WC 221 d ' -4 I JJi 178 Design 45d 0% I 179 Review Plans 21d 0% 180 Obtain Right of Way Od 181 Finalize Plans 10d �,0% 182 Advertise 28d 1 0% 183 Council Bid Award 1 d 12/25 184 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 0% I I 185 Preconstruction Conference 1d 1/18 186 Construction 100d j 0% Project Description: Seal Coat Woodland Heights and 8" Water Line Construction Discussion: This project was originally funded for completing the seal coat in the FY1996-97 for an estimated $17,500. The seal coat has been completed. The 8" water line was approved to be funded for the FY1997-98 at an estimated cost of$30,000. This water line will loop the water line within the Woodland Heights Subdivision and Oak Tree Estates Subdivision. Project Description: W. Dove St.from Shady Oaks to Kirkwood Branch Creek Discussion: This project involves reconstructing the existing roadway. As part of this project, there will be no widening of the existing roadway. The culvert under the road located just west of Shady Oaks will be replaced as part of this project. Construction has begun for this project. The construction should take up to four months. 11 96 1997 1998 — 1 ID Task Name Duration 711A1S1O1N D JIFIMIAIMI4IJIAISIOINID 4IFIMIAIMIJ[JIAISIOINID JIF 1 Dow(Shady to Creek) 409 ' 1 2 Design 65 10 3 Review Plans 21 I 100% 4 Obtain Right of Way 0 I 5 Finalize Plans 6 "100% 6 Advertise 13 1=3 100% 7 Council Bid Award 1 9/16 1 1 8 Obtain Contract Documents 36 1 100% I' 9 Preconstruction Conference 1 11/14 10 I Construction 120 10% I Project Description: Highland Road from Shady Oaks to White Chapel Discussion: This project involves reconstructing the existing roadway. Although there will be no widening of the roadway, the alignment of W. Highland will be realigned with E. Highland. The city is currently negotiating with two homeowners to acquire the required right-of-way. The city hopes to have this right-of-way by mid-February. Construction is anticipated to last for 180 days. L * Dcsigtatcs a nevv project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 20 T_.. 197 ID Task Name Ouration A�S�OrN�D J�FiM�A�M�J�9J�A�S�O�N�D J�F�MTA�MjJ�98�A�S�O�N D J�F�M) 12 Highland(Shady-WC) 579 tb 4 13 Design 65 ::` • 14 Review Plans 21 ., 00% 15 Obtain Right of Way 248 50% j 16 Finalize Plans 6 100,E l 17 Advertise 28 © 0% J 18 ! Council Bid Award 1 O +13/26 19 i Obtain Contract Documents 15 0 0% 20 Preconstruction Conference 1 O 4/17 21 Construction 180 0% 1 Project Description: Timarron Street Rehab Discussion: The scope of this project has changed from the original. Originally, the distressed streets were to be repaired as one project. Under a City Council recommendation, the project was to be phased into three separate projects. Each phase would repair the distressed pavement within the phase boundary. These phases would have been completed over a 2 to 3 year period. The first phase was bid on recently. The bid prices were higher than expected and City Council directed staff to request bids on just the grouting portion of the project for the entire subdivision. The paving replacement and rehabilitation will take place separately in the coming years. The project was awarded for bid for the grouting portion to Phase One only. Construction has begun for this project and should be complete within the next couple of weeks. 96 1997 1998 ID Task Name Duration JIAISIO�N�D J[FIMIAIMIJIJIA[SIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIF 23 Street Rehab- Timarron eta 370 ' 0 24 Design 93 100°A 25 Review Plans 10 "4 26 I Obtain Right of Way 0 27 i Finalize Plans 45 CI 100% 1 28 Advertise 24 10Q% 29 Council Bid Award 1 O 11V1 S 30 Obtain Contract Documents 15 —1 0 Q°di 31 Preconstruction Conference 1 00 32 Construction 45 r r 45% Project Description: Ridgecrest Road Discussion: This project involves reconstructing the existing roadway and constructing various drainage improvements. If needed, the widening of the existing cross-section of this road will be limited to 1 to 2 feet. The design of this project is completed. The offsite easements for drainage have been successfully negotiated and are currently being obtained from the downstream property owner. Construction is anticipated to take at least 90 days, which will place the completion date at the end of August, 1998. L * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 21 (111.• 1997 1998 ' 1999 1� ID Task Name Duration JIFIMIAIMjJIJIAISjOINjD JIFIM1AIMIJ1JIAjSjOfNID JIFIMIAIMiJIJ1AI 34 Ridgecrest Road 358 W , i --y 35 Design 140 100% 36 Review Plans 5 0 100% H I 37 Obtain Right of Way 90 50% 38 Finalize Plans 10 Ce% 39 1 Advertise 21 1=30% I 40 I Council Bid Award 1 ;J 3/20 41 Obtain Contract Documents 15 0% 1MI 42 { Preconstruction Conference 1 0 14;13 43 I Construction 90 0% fff r Project Description: Continental Blvd.from Davis to White Chapel Discussion: This scope of this project involves reconstructing the roadway and improving the drainage along Continental. The roadway width will be increased in areas as needed at various intersections with side streets to subdivisions and in front of Carroll Elementary. At these locations, the roadway will be widened to three lanes. The design is in its beginning stages and should be complete by the end of October. The city will need 30 days to review and approve these construction plans. Obtaining the required easements and right-of-way may take longer than originally anticipated. This delay will probably occur in part because of a possible condemnation of the property located northeast of the intersection of Peytonville and Continental. At this location, the city has recommended that the current alignment of the road be changed. This change will result in the taking of property for the ROW at the aforementioned intersection. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 180 days. This project should be completed b the beginning of May, 1999. 1997 1998 I 1999 ID Task Name Duration JIFIMfAJMIJJJIA1SIOINID J)FIMIAIMIJ!JIAISIOINID,JIFIMIAIMIJIJIA 45 Continental Blvd 504 irimmiammiminhi . 46 Design 200 ' _ 70% 47 Review Plans 21 0% 48 Obtain Right of Way 150 t 0°6 ci 49 Finalize Plans 10 O 0% 50 Advertise 21 _ 0% ' 51 Council Bid Award 1 O I' 8/6 52 Obtain Contract Documents 15 o 1 0% 53 Preconstruction Conference 1 08/28 54 Construction 180 c 0% Project Description: Burney to Cul-de-sac Discussion: The design of this project is ongoing. This project involves reconstructing the pavement from the cul-de-sac to approximately 1000' west along Burney. The city will require 20 days to review and approve the plans. The advertising, bidding, and award of contract will take up to 45 days. Construction is anticipated to take at least 90 days. The schedule is on the next page. L * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 22 1997 1998 1999 I ID Task Name Duration FIMIAIM!JIJIAIS!OINID J�F�M�A�M�J�J�A[S�O�N�D J�F[M�A�M�J', J AJSI 56 Burney to Cul-de-sac 298 57 Design 150 35°6 58 Review Plans 15 0% 59 Obtain Right of Way 0 ./13 60 Finalize Plans 5 n 0% 61 Advertise 21 0 0% 62 Council Bid Award 1 4/14 63 Obtain Contract Documents 15 0% 64 Preconstruction Conference 1 65 Construction 90 = 0% S.H. 114 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The State of Texas has recently committed to appropriating money over the next several years for the reconstruction of S.H. 114. Consequently, the City of Southlake must satisfy several agendas before the start of construction. The next few projects listed need to be funded for the FY1997- 98 CIP budget in order to carry out these agendas. Project Description: Channel Improvements along the Jones Branch* Discussion: Currently, Wal-Mart and the Village Center Development are detaining the runoff from their sites. The proposed R.O.W. for S.H. 114 along these developments is the land area which these detention ponds presently occupy. These detention ponds will be eliminated for the reconstruction of S.H. 114. Before these detention ponds are eliminated, provisions must be made to the downstream properties in order to increase the capacity of the current Jones Branch. The city will appropriate $250,000 for each of the FY1997-98 and FY1998-99 for the easement acquisition and construction of drainage improvements along the Jones Branch. These improvements must be accomplished before construction of S.H. 114 begins. Project Description: R.O.W. Acquisition at S.H. 114 and Dove St.* Discussion: The city has committed to obtaining the additional R.O.W. required to build the future intersection of Dove St. and S.H. 114. The estimated cost for the appraisals, property, etc. is $1,500,000, which will be funded for the FY1997-98. Project Description: Utility Relocation along S.H. 114* Discussion: The city must relocate the existing utilities which are located in the S.H. 114 R.O.W. These utilities must be relocated prior to construction of S.H. 114. For the FY1997-98, an estimated $269,600 will be required to relocate utilities before the first phase of construction begins(Dove/S.H. 114 intersection). MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Project Description: Traffic Signal Lights on F.M. 1709* Discussion: Recently, the city conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis along F.M. 1709. The results warranted traffic signal lights at the intersections of Shady Oaks and F.M. 1709 and * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 23 Commerce and F.M. 1709. For the FY1997-98 CIP budget, $100,000 will be appropriated for the signal lights at each of these intersections. The design is currently underway for these traffic lights and installation should begin by July, 1998. Project Description: Heritage Business Park Infrastructure Improvements* Discussion: The city is committed, through the Developer's Agreement, to reimbursing the developer for the oversizing of the water line along Kimball and the street improvements constructed in the Heritage Business Park. These reimbursements are estimated to cost $85,000 and will be funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. Project Description: Keller Water Meter Purchases for Southlake Residents on Keller Water* Discussion: The City of Keller currently provides water service for approximately 250 residents of the City of Southlake. In order to transfer these customers to Southlake water, the city must purchase these water meters, water lines, etc. Therefore, the city proposes to transfer residents in the coming fiscal years in phases. For the FY1997-98, the city is allotting $250,000 for the purchase of a number of meters. In the subsequent years, all residents of the City of Southlake will be transferred to Southlake water. (kir * Designates a new project ** Designates a revision to a previously proposed project 24 CNEWS CLIPPLNG • _-- -- -- Date: I ,"� By Joy Dickinson which is being developed as the city's first Siff 16baef TheDa rllorningNews downtown area.The city complex is expec- SOUTHLAKE — Score one for the little ted to be open by late 1999. guy: .Southlake, 1; Austin, San Antonio, "It's a great thing," Town Square devel- Houston and Irving,zip.The newly formed oper Brian Stebbins said Wednesday. "It's Texas Sister Cities International group has one more step in making Southlake more i chosen Southlake as its headquarters, re- identifiable as a separate city from Dallas jad bidsfrom ds from the four larger cities. and Fort Worth. Anything that incre.ssws City officials announced the coup late awareness of what we're doing in Southlake , last week after a daylong Austin meeting of is going to have a terrific impact." , 1 more than a dozen Texas Sister Cities dele- i gates. Sixty-four cities in Texas boast sister-city relationships. It's unclear how many- of Texas Sister Cities International,a coali- those will join Texas Sister Cities Interne- tion of Lone Star communities with "sib- tional. At last week's meeting, Mary Palko ' Bags"in countries all over the world, will of Fort Worth was named chairwoman of house its operations at the new city-school the group, with Brad Bradley, Southlake j Cadministration building in Town Square, municipal judge,as vice chairman.Ms.Pal- I) co also is state coordinator for Sister Cities Officials say they expect the statewide the airport, were determining facto rc4n .nternational, and Judge Bradley started group,a chapter of Sister Cities Internation- Southlake's selection'as the Texas gron he local Sister Cities group. al, to boost economic and cultural ties be- headquarters, officials said. Also, njthi tween Southlake and cities worldwide. the city's residents ark.internatio> �Jji It remains undecided where the group Southlake,which has participated in Sister nesspeople. - 4. still be stationed until the new administra- n hot rq Cities International since 1990,has two sib- Plans are already under way to shoes ion building opens;a second organization- lings: Toyoma, Japan, and El Fuerte, Sina- the city's international flair, with;„", n meeting is planned for March 11 in Fort- loe,Mexico. bons including North. flyiaB at Tows �r "a . Having the state organization headquar- from all the cities where residept N Once Southlake officials realized the op- tered here is expected to draw hundreds of from, as well as the flags of all e. ., )ortunity, they moved quickly to capture visitors to Southlake for an annual confer- Sister cities. "y gagging rights as "Home of Texas Sister ence and other events. Also, overseas visi- Part of the fun and challenge:iv i11'- = :ities." The City Council voted Jan. 7 to tors who pass through Dallas-Fort Worth coming up with ... ideas for how the cow= spend up to$20,000 to get an office up and International Airport on the way to tour munity wants to reflect the diveiii di. running. Once the office opens, member- their sister cities will be invited stop in ' Southlake, and going beyond that,teer ,hip and conference fees will help pay the Southlake for a day or two en route. , versity of Sister Cities,"Mr.Stebbins said, :stimated$35,000 to$40,000 in annual oper- Southlake's location between Dallas and Joy Dickinson can be reached,on�lha sting expenses. Fort Worth,as well as its close proximity to Internet at jdickinson@daliasnews.coln„•:. 1 i 1 C., YEWS CLIPP[ iG I Source: '! 0:,1,(4.5 ��i ,, ,), , ii5 f ,,,�;S II Date: 12 Z Airingit our . .. , Southlake alters land pla. ..„...,3,1 • fi1` ' 1 to ease fears of crowding:": B�y Joy � Dickinson SkS ( � A'.��"' 1/�p rite Dallas morning yRws - u' `, I SOUTHLAKE The city's revised Land,.Use-. Plan won unanimous -approval from theGtq►_-- Council this week,with members making severer al last-minute changes to calm residents'fears of- an overly crowded future. - _ :, :4 "I think we always need to err on the side:ole: being conservative," council member Pam, Muller said after several residents voicedtheir` i worries about Southlake's booming'developmef:, "tf you look at what this council has histori- 1ne,we've always gone toward lower deb d use whenever we could." - veral tracts, most north of FM1709, here ' • - !I changed by the council from the staff recce ' mended medium-density residential, whicll4 - would allow both single-family dwellings and sand plan in Southlake altered office development, to low-density residential„ which allows single-family dwellings only. -t to vase concerns about crowding Also, a controversial tract at the southeast; corner of FM1709 and South Carroll Avenge:4 Continued from Page 1N. Council and staff members=- Please see LAND on Page 2N. ',,- ;:::::: changed from retail commercial to tinned that the Land Use Plan has '�':'. '' office commercial, a lowerdensity no binding authority and affects ve- - ;•-.; +-- use.That tract was zoned for retail cant tracts far more than propeoyy ...:,., ' , upe in early 1996 for the planned that already has been developed .It Southtete Commons development, is meant to be used merely as a tciol v1hich has stalled. "I just don't see by the council and planning and that ever happening," Mayor Rick zoning commissioners in making Stacy said at Tuesday's meeting. decisions, and does not affect cur- rent zoning. The majority of- council mem- This is the first revision of,the bars agreed that despite the tract's plan since 1993. Greg Last,direetor existing zoning,which would allow of community development, has retail development, the Land Use said an update was needed to bring Plan should reflect "the vision of the Land Use Plan into alignment the council for how we think that with the more recent Corridor area of town should look," in the Overlay Plan, as well as to reflect words of Gary Fawks. new schools and park space, flood- plain amendments and other con- : Residents applauded loudly cerny (...... when the council passed the Joy Dickinson can be reached or amended plan. About 22 people at- the Internet at jdickinson@dafas tended the public hearing. news.com .act .- is t'i Li NEWS CLIPPLNG • Sol.: _ Date: / �j I Section B,Page 10/Star-Telegram/Thursday,January 22, 1998 N Carroll district to join tax zone Officials balk at paying estimated share of administration buildingcost GINA INA TEDESCO GIdesign or know the square footage, million. Tomorrow, the first of 25 Star-Telegram S Writer it's hard to accurately gauge the to 30 administrators and staff Carroll school district agreed to cost of that building,"Gillum said. members will begin moving to the join a new "club" but won't pay The district also wants a break- site,Thannum said. any dues just yet. down of costs for infrastructure,The Board of Trustees voted such as roads and sewers, school The the site cannot sheommo- date all school officials, late Tuesday to join Southlake and district spokeswoman Julie re she said Tarrant County officials in a 256- Thannum said. ■Expand the current adminis- Cr, acre tax increment financing zone. Written details of the buildingtration building on Carroll Avenue Part of the zone's future interest,at a costof over 30 ears. including tax money will be used to property a should be available to district :; trustees within two to four weeks, 30 years. $10 million administration build- said Brian Stebbins, president of • Lease office space across ing as part of Town Square, a new Cooper and Stebbins, the develop- from Carroll I "igh School on the downtown near Farm Road 1709. er of Town Square. north side of Farm Road 1709. faced Southlake officials had hoped Gillum said'tl'W option surfaced Pe Thannum said the district P that school district officials would believes that it's a good concept to - Tuesday, an� did not have a move their offices into the building have city, county and school offi_ cost estimate, . inand share some common areas cials in one building but that The fo supermarket maybe with city and county officials. trustees must do what is cost effec- the least expensive site, Thannuti -The city proposed that the dis- five for the district. said. But there could be adown- tire' t pay $5.2 million toward the Currently, school administrators side to putting school administra- project from school property taxes are spread among six district sites, tors outside St`fttthlake, Gillum f'6llected in the zone. Thannum said said. Trustee. y Gilmore said ,t' But Carroll officials said the "It's not effective for coinmuiu_ she is unconcerned. district will not contribute tax cation. We need to get our people "It's still on_ CISD property," money to the zone, although that together,"she said. she said. could change. Gillum said that in addition to Gillum also said that using the School officials want the figures Town Square, he is looking at former food store would eat up itemizing the district's share of the three options for an administration space intended for needed ware- project's costs, Superintendent Ted site: Gillum said. housing. •Add offices to a former Food School board President Buddy Using estimates that he has Lion supermarket at 3051 W.Dove Luce said, a mad of received, Gillum said the district's Road in Grapevine for at least options. Therere maayy be an her cost should be$2.75 million. $400,000. The district bought the building somewhere [that] some- "Because we don't have a property and renovated it for $1.4 one may want us to get in." C (1., NEWS CLIPPLNG I , i iu� '� (�lL ��t'r - - j Date: ' 2 —1 1Soy, 1 • • • Southiake committee to review N Tuesday,January 27, 1998/Star-Telegram/Section B,Page 7). �..:.r� proposed amendments to city charter y BY MARISA TAYLOR tee of three city officials and six The meeting, at 7 p.m. in Ste-Telegram Staff Writer residents as one of several pro- Southlake's administration build- SOUTH .,AI{E — Occasional- posed changes to the city charter. ing, comes several months after ly,Mayor Rick Stacy can be heard The committee includes council the City Council scrapped plans-to grumbling about Southlake's members Scott Martin and Ralph conduct a special election on the 1 (6., charter. Evans and Planning and Zoning proposed charter amendments in 1 Stacy has blamed his frustra- Commissioner P.C.LeVrier. November. Southlake-voters may tion on language in the 10-year- "The reading of the caption is approve changes to the charter old document that forces him to probably the most consistently every two years. read rambling preambles before annoying thing in the city charter The next regular charter elec- , City Council actions. that we might change," Council- tion is in May. I Today, the mayor's pet peeve man David Harris said. "It's the The November election was ' might be discussed by,a commit- nth degree of silly." canceled because of the expense', II of having a special election and so hearing, and allowing the council members $500 a month and the that the city could get more input to approve 1-acre zoning issues mayor $750 a month will;proba from residents, Councilman without a public hearing., bly be the most controversial;--. Wayne Moffat said- Committee members m;ght Fawks said. But the vote was also put off discuss the list again,"Southlake "I didn't support the idea after a controversial list of pro- officials said. before, and I'm not going to su posals was circulated in August. Although the committee should port it now,"he said. Among the 18 recommenda- be allowed to freely debate The council will probably votes;,;., tions from several council mem- changes to the charter, some of on the proposed changes in---7 hers were eliminating term limits, the proposals risk being rejected March.If the council approves the allowing the council to remove by the committee outright, Coun- recommendations, voters will appointed board members by a ci man Gary Fawks said. determine the outcome at the polls majority vote without a public A proposal to pay City Council May 2. I I1 I1 .. (...- NEWS CLLPPENG • (-- Source: �\ _up C, 1 a Date: f 2 9 i) Southiake Sist esr - .SOUTHLAKE OFFICIALS saw something they wanted, went after it and got it. They have succeeded in getting-their city „ named as the future headquarters of the Texas Sistei:Cit , i i; j program, and they deserve congratulations on their success t:F The state program currently has no headquarters. Mary Palko,0 Texas coordinator of Sister Cities International (based in !I Washington, D.C.), works out of her office in Fortth.Wor 'rhe Ti n pa1r program has 64 member cities in Texas,and the organizatios ' those cities with other cities worldwide to encourage cultural and economic exchange and international good will. C .: Earlier this month, Southlake's City Council authorized City Manager Curtis Hawk to offer$20,000 from the city's economic development fund as seed money to help Texas Sister Cities open II an office in Southlake. ;� But there was competition. Irving, Austin, San Antonio and' Houston also wanted to be selected as the state organiiation's home.Not only are those cities larger and thus potentially • powerful opponents,but they are strong participants in the Sister Cities program. Irving has four sister cities,Houston has,13 and i j ;� Austin has eight. `; But Southlake-which has two sister cities:Toyoina,Japat4� !' and El Fuerte,Sinaloa, Mexico—won`'out.The headquarterswillI be in the planned Town Square project. When it is opened,'the 1 I� organization's member cities will pay its operating costs. There is much talk in Southlake about the recognition and other benefits that this organization will bring. One of the biggest j bolts, though, is that4his experience stands as proof that Southlake can compete against the big guys and win. j 1 C ' City of Southlake,Texas 1 LIT MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-7, Calling General Election to be held on May 2, 1998. Resolution No. 98-7, allows for Calling a General Election in the City of Southlake, to be held on May 2, 1998. The resolution also establishes election precincts, names the appointments of Election Judge and Alternate Election Judge, establishes procedures for Early Voting, authorizes the City Secretary to make submissions to the United States Justice Department for Pre-Clearance of election procedures. During the last City Council meeting Council approved an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Southlake and Carroll Independent School District in favor of joint polling locations for the election. I discussed the locations with John Craft, Assistant Superintendent of CISD and he concurs with the same locations we have used in the past. The resolution in Section 6, notes the polling place for the General Election for all precincts of the City, to be held at Johnson Elementary School, 1301 North Carroll Avenue. Early Voting will be held in my office at the Administration Building, with the CISD voting to be held in the Mayor's Office. I forwarded this resolution to Betsy Elam, City Attorney and she found it to be in compliance with the Texas Election Code. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. /sl L . City of Southlake, Texascurl RESOLUTIQQ.PIO. 9877 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CALLING FOR A GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 1998; DESIGNATING A POLLING PLACE; ESTABLISHING ELECTION PRECINCTS WITHIN THE CITY; APPOINTING AN ELECTION JUDGE AND AN ALTERNATE JUDGE; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR EARLY VOTING; AUTHORIZING THE CITY SECRETARY TO MAKE SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FOR PRE-CLEARANCE APPROVAL; ESTABLISHING OTHER PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION; ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR CANVASSING RETURNS; ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR RUN OFF ELECTION IF NECESSARY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 41.001 of the Texas Election Code (the "Code") specifies that the first Saturday in May shall be a "Uniform Election Date" and that a General Election of a City may be held on such day; and, WHEREAS, state law and the charter of the City of Southlake require that a general election be held; and, WHEREAS, by this Resolution, it is the intention of the City Council to officially establish the election precincts within the City, to designate a polling place for the election, to appoint the necessary election officers and to establish and set forth procedures for conducting the election; and, WHEREAS, the changes from prior practices may require pre-clearance under the Federal Voting Rights Act; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. GENERAL ELECTION CALLED: A general election shall be held in the City of Southlake, Texas, on Saturday, May 2, 1998, at which the following officers will be elected: JUDGE OF MUNICIPAL COURT COUNCILMEMBER PLACE 3 COUNCILMEMBER PLACE 4 COUNCILMEMBER PLACE 5 CSection 2. TERM OF OFFICE: In accordance with the City Charter, the candidate for each of 5'1/-Z Resolution No. 98-7 Calling General Election page 2 the following offices receiving the majority of votes for such office shall be elected to a thr ee (3) year term beginning May 2, 1998, and ending May, 2001, or until a successor is duly elected and qualified. Section 3. ELIGIBILITY FOR CANDIDACY: In accordance with the City's Charter, no person shall be eligible for the Office of Judge of the Municipal Court, or Cou ncilmember unless he/she is a qualified elector of the City and has resided in the City for at least twelve (12) months preceding the election at which he/she is to be elected. Section 4. APPLICATION FOR A PLACE ON THE BALLOT: In accordance with Section 143.002 of the Code, any eligible and qualified person shall have his name printed upon the official ballot as a candidate for the offices herein set forth by filing his sworn application with the City Secretary not earlier than February 16, 1998, and not later than 5:00 p.m., March 18, 1998. Each such application shall be on a form prescribed by Section 141.031 of the Code. The order in which the names of the candidates are to be printed on the ballot shall be determined by a drawing by the City Secretary as provided by Section 52.094 of the Code. Notice of the time Li and place for such drawing shall be given in accordance with the Code. Section 5. ELECTION PRECINCTS: In accordance with Section 42.061 of the Code, the City Council of the City hereby establishes its election precincts for all municipal election from and after the effective day of this Resolution, such precincts to be coterminous with the boundaries of the below listed election precincts established by the Denton County and Tarrant County Commissioner's Courts, to the extent such election precincts are within the corporate boundaries of the City: Denton County Election Precinct No. 318 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3470 Tarrant County Election Precinct Na. 3039 Tarrant County-Election Precinct No. 3040 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3286 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3359 • Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3526 Tarrant County Election Precinct No. 3529 Section 6. POLLING PLACE: The polling place for the General Election for all precincts of the City shall be Johnson Elementary School, 1301 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas. The polls shall be open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on election day, in accordance with and pursuant to the requirements of the Code. Section 7. APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGE AND ALTERNATE ELECTION JUDGE: g7} -3 (v,„0, Resolution No. 98-7 Calling General Election page 3 The following named individuals, residing at the respective addresses are hereby appointed to serve as Presiding Election Judge and Alternate Presiding Election Judge, respectively, at the election: PRESIDING JUDGE: Aloha Payne, 1213 Whispering Lane, Southlake, Texas ALTERNATE JUDGE: Karen Cienki, 803 Shadow Glen Drive, Southlake, Texas The Election Judge and Alternate Judge shall be qualified voters of the City. The City Secretary shall, in accordance with Section 32.009 of the Code, deliver to the Presiding Judge and the Alternate Judge, notice of their appointments not later than twenty (20) days from the effective date of this Resolution. Section 8. APPOINTMENT OF CLERKS: The Presiding Judge for the polling place shall appoint Election Clerks as many additional clerks as are necessary for the proper conduct of the election. Provided, however, six (6) clerks shall be the maximum number of clerks which may be appointed to serve at the polling place. All Election Clerks shall be qualified voters of the City. Section 9. COMPENSATION OF THE ELECTION JUDGE AND ELECTION CLERKS: The Presiding Election Judge, Alternate Presiding Judge and each Election Clerk shall be compensated at the rate of $6.00 per hour in accordance with Section 32.091 of the Code. The Presiding Election Judge shall also be paid the additional sum of$25.00 for delivering the returns of the election. Section 10. METHOD OF VOTING: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and instructed to provide and furnish all necessary election supplies to conduct the General Election, in accordance with this resolution. Voting at the election shall be by electronic voting machines and shall be conducted in accordance with the Code. Section 11. GOVERNING LAW AND QUALIFIED VOTERS: The election shall be held in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Texas and the Code, and all resident qualified voters of the City shall be eligible to vote at the election. (hoe Section 12. PUBLICATION AND POSTING OF NOTICE OF ELECTION: Notice of the election shall be published twice no earlier than April, 2, 1998, and no later than April 22, 1998, • (yr Resolution No. 98-7 Calling a General Election page 4 in the newspaper in accordance with the provisions of the Code. Additionally, notice shall be posted no later than April 11, 1998, in the regular place for posting notice of meetings of the City Council of the City, and shall remain posted continuously through election day, May 2, 1998. Section 13. EARLY VOTING: Early Voting by personal appearance shall be conducted between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on each day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or an official State Holiday, beginning on April 15, 1998, and continuing through April 28, 1998. Early Voting hours shall include: Wednesday April 15, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Thursday April 16, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Friday April 17, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday April 18, 1998 Closed Sunday April 19, 1998 Closed Monday April 20, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Tuesday April 21, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Wednesday April 22, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (re Thursday April 23, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Friday April 24, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday April 25, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday April 26, 1998 Closed Monday April 27, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Tuesday April 28, 1998 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Early Voting by personal appearance shall be held at the Office of the City Secretary 1725 East Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas 76092. Applications for early voting by mail shall be delivered to the City Secretary at the same address not earlier than March 3, 1998 and not later than the close of business on April 24, 1998. Early Voting, both by personal appearance and by mail, shall be by electronic voting machines and shall be canvassed by the Early Ballot Board, which is hereby created. The Presiding Election Judge and the Alternate Presiding Election Judge appointed herein shall serve as the presiding officer and the alternate presiding officer, respectively, of the Early Voting Ballot Board. The other election officers serving at the election shall serve as the other members of the Early Voting Ballot Board. Section 14. CANVASSING OF RETURNS: The City Council shall convene on May 5, 1998 at 6:00 p.m. to canvass the returns of the general election. Section 15. RUNOFF ELECTION: In accordance with Section 2.025 (b) (2) of the Code, in the event no candidate receives a majority of votes for an office, there shall be a runoff election held 5f� -� • (re Resolution No. 98-7 Calling a General Election page 5 on May 23, 1998. Section 16. SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to make such submissions as are necessary to the United States Justice Department to seek pre-clearance approval for additional length of the absentee voting period. Section 17. DELIVERY OF RETURNS: In accordance with the Code, immediately after the closing of the polls on the day of the election, the election officers named in this resolution shall make and deliver the returns of the election in triplicate as follows: one copy shall be retained by the Presiding Judge; one copy shall be delivered to the Mayor of the City; and one copy of the returns together with the ballot boxes and all election supplies shall be delivered to the City Secretary. All election records and supplies shall be preserved by the City Secretary in accordance with the Code. Section 18. NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Secretary of the City, in consultation with the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions Lenecessary to comply with the provisions of the Code in carrying out and conducting the election, whether or not expressly authorized herein. Section 19. EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution shall be effective upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: • Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney D:\W P-FILES\ELECTION\RES-98-7.ELE ff/ . i City of Southlake, Texas i I I i , (lib, MEMORANDUM January 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to extend the lease with Bootstrap Investments for Administrative Office Space The original lease agreement for the office space at 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard (the Administrative Offices) was for two years commencing on February 1, 1996. The lease also provided for two (2) one-year options to extend the lease. As of February 1, 1998, we will enter into the first one-year extension option. Attached is the lease extension agreement with Bootstrap Investments (formerly Telesupport) for an extension of our present lease through January 31, 1999. The initial lease agreement also included a gross rental increase on February 1, 1997 (midway through the initial lease term) and an increase on February 1, 1998. The lease extension agreement reflects this increase for the period February 1, 1998 through January 31, 1999 (gross rental rate of$15.00 per square foot), but also states that the rate will remain the same should the City exercise the second one-year option (February 1, 1999 through January 31, 2000). Please place this item on the February 3 City Council agenda for their consideration. If you have any further questions, please contact me. p Attachment: Lease Renewal Agreement with Bootstrap Investments L 5 (6 - I Bootstrap" ;,.,tiescme.vc s Kevin Hugman 1)10 January 16, 1998 Community Services Manager City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Mr. Hugntan, We have received your request to exercise your right to renew your lease on the property at 1725 E. Southlake Blvd_ pursuant to the commercial lease agreement dated 1/16/96. The renewal period is for twelve (12) months, beginning February 1, 1998 and terminating on January 31, 1999. The City has approximately 5692 square feet under contract. Addendum 'B' to the lease calls for a fixed rental adjustment to S15.00 per square foot effective February I, 1998. The base rent for the year is S85,380, payable in monthly installments of S7,115 per month in advance and due of the first day of the month. The lease on the property may be extended at your request,for another 12 months from February 1, 1999 to January 31, 2000. The request for the extension must be received by Bootstrap 30 days prior to the termination date of the February 1, 1998 extension. The gross rate for the extension commencing on February 1. 1999 will remain at S15.00 per square foot. All other provisions the contract will remain in force exactly as they have been written. Please sign and return one copy of this letter to: Bootstrap Investments P.O. Box 92562 Southlake,Texas 76092 Landlord Tenant • • Signature Signature Name Po OliCk I ON1))*0 Name Title / ,�l�F/Lr Title Date flap °f8 Date • 56 - 2 Bootstrap Investments, Inc. (817) 416-0696 P.O. Box 92562, Southlake, Texas 76092 City of Southiake, Texas - MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for the construction of Miron Elevated Water Tower BACKGROUND The design of the proposed water tower to be located at the south end of Miron Dr. is complete and has been reviewed by staff. The proposed tank is necessary to improve water pressure and fire flow in the southeast portion of the City. The estimated cost of the proposed tank has increased from $1,560,000.00 to 1,710,000.00. There are several factors involved in the increased cost. The first factor in the increase is required modifications to the elevated tanks located at Bicentennial Park and E. Dove St. These modifications are to ensure that the tanks are maintained at capacity level and do not overfill when construction of the new tank is complete. Second, the design now includes a precast fence that will surround the tank site. Also, a second floor in the tank shaft is proposed which could increase the cost as part of an alternate bid. The tank at Bicentennial Park has an additional floor that increases the non-water storage capacity. The engineering and construction costs are divided equally between FY 97-98 and FY 98-99 budgets, amounting to $855,000.00 each year. Once the bid has been awarded the consulting engineer and tank manufacturer will evaluate possible aesthetic qualities that could be added to the tank. The current design is for a paint scheme similar to the elevated tank at Bicentennial Park. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council authorize advertisement for bids for the construction of an elevated water tower at the south end of Miron Drive. Please place this item on the February 3, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE Attachments: Site Plan 5C-1 7s • '-- .. . :•4, .• 0. ., , . • Z1 '.Z. •6.--,1-,.ir — ;‘, Iii.A.,..;•i• ....^" .. , 1 * .tl 14; _4 r;i f• ----.4. -,,;;Ii;!, le 1.4 cr rri 7. - -lIfIT-i, NI(4411-1 I [ -7.7i,i; ri!o!:-.i.,J ,.... ._. F.-• L ,c,„,:, .c.,2 ... •;;•.;;;;.; "F: ',',,•- •i' ''.",•• '0.J --7,,.12—\ ; ii.i r I,t' f . 2,/ g.7.1,..<o• . , .•,1 fkt.a.V I t ; .,-:, ._,- - :'--5 1Fii;."1:ii 1 . Cr) •„7, ,...; CO ,-- :•••.: 7. i,t3 i ,7,•.' ..'':.iy :),Airi , •" T.:- ! ., ... ,-.,-.I. 6,.'. t ,z- •z:,:,....i.: ci:-+ i..-• 4.,";?,';',1 y...), :: , : , . 1.• . , tij fit I i M•21,16.•- 1.- :._, 2•17 L.).2 l ".i.-1.4i.:!: -- .•/4-4,-I! —11•Xe I 1 . • . .)- ,..• :1 21 i'-i•1;1 ge 13 1 2,i .:2 'g; .'•', .1...1 '-'-',.., • :„,.1 'I 2• - : -t.:: ,;-; -i ZI ;St• • *;%;1.0 4.--) f?'";-,:fi' (f) :-:" ,.`1 =',41 Tr; 'Ma..r. , 00,..1 - . ....._ . :•••g I I I. 74'1 [ I ':\ ' lr 1:: C.::1 • ..--•.... v-- C—, E. t,' .1 tt,'-'2:4 ,... ••••••1 d EIE:ii . Cr..1 - .,. ... . ' ' !, '., • 1', t.; .. . 1 1 4 I 7 1 , i; Vu 1 ; '•:? •.1 zci : __I. /// 1 . 17.:," : z• .,.• :..; ;i 1. i I 1 i,a . — • 5; —7'.. , L 3A180 NOHIIN i'....„, ssss\/' ';I % 4, .. I I ...,..."4, ;,.:...4 1 ' '5 -,:-:; 3 F., F. ..:.: F.••:, ::),,sco.I.. I r- , • ; • I 1 1 ,- , •-. ..' s•X 1:::'4, ' 4& ..,...... f':(4:' •ti.'•-, L._I -_'-----.I.V.a,:':',`'' ''---- ----- --LI, t !..a„ i., . .. ... ... f,..,. • _ ... _ _ i . 1 . 1 ..• -;i4" z 8 8 8 .:.•..j 1:' MK*1.1 ev my IN",14 v. a.: :.• 4.?„, I ; ,,... ...,:i 7.ik Y 1:•-.1 --. I -. •• : .,;,:! i 1:1,1 ,,,;, .t.li: " :, - Ls- ri•^. 1' .r .V, 6141 IINV I••1.Intl 41,re.•••••••• •• IF I r 7,r Ze° :,..I? ••• ..,<.e.r< I :I—:;,...-.. .. g.:4,1 c „. ,..••••• ‘.. ...0......,....................... 1 1 rkzgrzi 3 .,g.,_:: .., , I • , / g,-,•• L 0.%14 .:;:: :IR, ; :..411---- - *. . ;11? '4 4' ‘4.7. '1 • i 1 .,814 irk?. .t. hi '•"%t,, !.i i: f ., '. ...7 17,V.p 1 . 2i•ft, 1-- (-) .c., ,..5•/,. .\ I ' ' 14 f: ' , . ..> •.-•. . ..•;" !' ...'fli ,r14 ''' . . t . • t ck: rl .: 12 . 0 , 0..i?,....„.•,,1.6. ;...itp,1!:14.1, r i ,,4'..,4 :' ( I .)_ ,;t-',": ;,;-:•-;35-1. i 4 I 7 z, • ;. ''. rij ;.. I .. 2,., 1 :".;',1 . ..; i ,53 ‘• '-iii•e\si t •I2,• 0 I — r.4.?".i" (.._) t s • • ' .1' 11 :'.: ' '''il !. i •‘7• ;1; '..,-- -; -.co.""•=:--.:_.••• ,j 1 1 ;0•-.. 'S . .. .. .. . _. _ _. . _ _ s ___ .2; ? 1 •••• _ , ! 2. •,._; ;3- 2 .• ..., op cs i .r ...... ,:-•..... •••- L !. 1.. '-.. -.. I.. 1 1•,.I., V. ,l, I.,/I urea'0,I ro I...MM.•.•. i .. 11 A I li.4 -4'.?/... , •!.4 ,_ , .•:. I.; 4 16.... -(..),, .....,,c. - y (4,-../ /.. (/' fit- ,1 ; 1AT . ......r,3,2 g '":14i17 5C-2 City of Southlake, Texas -- MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 L TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for the construction of Miron Elevated Water Tower BACKGROUND The design of the proposed water tower to be located at the south end of Miron Dr. is complete and has been reviewed by staff. The proposed tank is necessary to improve water pressure and fire flow in the southeast portion of the City. The estimated cost of the proposed tank has increased from $1,560,000.00 to 1,710,000.00. There are several factors involved in the increased cost. The first factor in the increase is required modifications to the elevated tanks located at Bicentennial Park and E. Dove St. These modifications are to ensure that the tanks are maintained at capacity level and do not overfill when construction of the new tank is complete. Second, the design now includes a precast fence that will surround the tank site. Also, a second floor in the tank shaft is proposed which could increase the cost as part of an alternate bid. The tank at Bicentennial Park has an additional floor that increases the non-water storage capacity. The engineering and construction costs are divided equally between FY 97-98 and FY 98-99 budgets, amounting to $855,000.00 each year. Once the bid has been awarded the consulting engineer and tank manufacturer will evaluate possible aesthetic qualities that could be added to the tank. The current design is for a paint scheme similar to the elevated tank at Bicentennial Park. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council authorize advertisement for bids for the construction of an elevated water tower at the south end of Miron Drive. Please place this item on the February 3, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE Attachments: Site Plan 5C-1 r l -11 0 01 ZZ: . � =;' '(,� !k ! lip; 'v s i- rn i. �Y 1 :'4 titiii,iri 1 ' 1 t! •L... :'.., z c)7, ..i. --."zi'g I i F,'• 14' 2..,-' :it s\k.!1"1%1.1.1..LJ • �\ .34 I = 1 v.n i W \ I,. % i ' - J .I. 1 .i t Z; t s' H 17, t -$c I • # # 1 / - - — — I ' , , / -,N/ , .7, to . i : : : II 1 I r., 17w , y �nn . .I ,:I X..$a rw.,rruow 1.w:•nnv, +,t c, _ 7Mr lnz 1 ( . d.iom t Cy ,�y43 : y r rrt t n 1' / r�.? _ _rY, r, i �II ��'I :tea C_t p-- - :r.�_.. J u" c _.10! .. Y. 11 t li)WI I 2 I. .14 ��0, �(i1 - ,ry lw. ' rt N�bN.M. SC-2 City of Southlake, Texas - MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Dunaway and Associates for the design of street improvements for Burney Lane and Love Henry Court BACKGROUND Attached is a professional services agreement for the design of rehabilitation of Burney Lane and Love Henry Court. These two projects are part of the schedule of capital improvements funded for FY 97-98. The contract provides for the design, engineering, and surveying of the street improvements. The total cost of this project is $24,280.00. This amount is provided for in the FY 97- 98 Capital Improvement Budget. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Dunaway and Associates for the design of street improvements for Burney Lane and Love Henry Court. Please place this item on the February 3, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. CRE Attachment: Professional Services Agreement 5D-1 STATE OF TEXAS 5� COUNTY OF TARRANT � KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the City of Southlakc,a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County,Texas,acting herein by and through Mr. Rick Stacy, its duly elected Mayor, hereinafter called "City", and Dunaway Associates, Inc., acting herein by and through James E. DeOtte, P.E., its duly authorized Vice President, hereinafter called "Engineer",hereby make and enter into the following agreement: ARTICLE I. SERVICES Section I. For and in consideration of the covenants herein contained,Engineer hereby covenants and agrees as an independent contractor,to perform the services hereinafter described with diligence and in accordance with the professional standards customarily obtained for such services in the State of Texas. The services to be performed by Engineer hereunder shall include rehabilitative design of paving,drainage,pavement marking. culverts and all other necessary design and engineering ork for improvements in connection with the following projects and locations: 1) Rehabilitation design of Love Henry Court 2) Rehabilitative design of Burney Rd.from Carroll to Lonesome Dove Section 2. The services to be performed by Engineer shall also include the following(also sec Attachment#1) for Rehabilitative Design of Love-Henry Court and Burney Road: I) When requested by the City,the Engineer shall attend preliminary conferences with authorized representatives of the City regarding the project and such other conferences as may be necessary in the opinion of the City so that the plans and specifications which are to be developed hereunder by the Engineer will result in providing facilities which are economical in design and conform to instruction from the City. 2) The Engineer shall attend such conferences with officials of other agencies as may be necessary in the opinion of the City for coordination of the proposed street and storm drain improvements with the requirements of such other agencies. It shall be the Engineer's duty hereunder to secure necessary information from such agencies. 3) The Engineer shall advise the City with regard to the necessity for subcontract work such as - special surveys, tests, test borings, or other subsurface investigations in connection with design and engineering work to be performed hereunder. The Engineer shall also advise the City concerning the results of same. Such surveys,tests,and investigations shall be made only upon authorization by the City. 4) During the Concept Phase the Engineer shall coordinate with all utilities as to any proposed utility lines or adjustment to existing utility lines within the project limits. The Engineer shall show the location of the proposed utility lines,existing utility lines and any adjustments and/or relocation of the existing lines within the project limits. The Engineer shall show on the preliminary and final plans the location of the proposed utility lines,existing utility lines and any adjustments and/or relocation of the existing lines. The Engineer shall also evaluate the phasing of the utility work as a factor in the actual drainage improvements as a part of the final plans of the project(Phase 3). 5) The Engineer shall provide necessary field surveys. 6) Engineer shall provide detailed design data,cross-sections,profiles,drainage calculations, estimates of cost and complete detailed plans and specifications. Design guidance shall be obtained from NCTCOG,TxDOT,and AASHTO. 7) The Engineer shall submit three(3)copies of plans in preliminary form.The engineer shall submit to utility companies and other agencies for the purposes of coordinating work with existing and proposed utilities. The preliminary plans shall indicate location of existing/proposed utilities and storm drain lines. 8) The Engineer shall furnish three(3)copies of detailed Final Drawings and three(3)copies of Specifications for Constnietion as authorized by the City for use in obtaining bids, 9610500_Contract_012898_JED.%gxt - I - 5D-2 awarding contracts,constructing and completing the proposed improvements. The Engineer shall furnish and indicate on the plans the location of existing and proposed utilities and storm drains. 9) The Engineer shall furnish ten(10)copies of Final Construction Drawings and ten(10)bound copies of the Contract Documents containing the Notice to Bidders,Proposal, Labor Rates, Experience Records,General and Special Provisions, Specifications, insurance Statement, Performance and Payment Bonds,and Contract forms. 10) The Engineer shall furnish two (2) copies of detailed cost estimates and proposals for authorized construction,which shall include summaries of bid items and quantities. I I) The Engineer shall secure the approval of the City of the final plans and specifications. Evidence of such approval shall be the signatures of authorized City officials inscribed on the plans. All Contract Documents shall comply in all respects with applicable local,state,and federal laws and with applicable rules and regulations promulgated by local,state and national boards,bureaus and agencies. Approval by the City shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Engineer,its officers,agents,employees and subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of the services performed hereunder, including but not limited to designs,working drawings and specifications or other engineering documents. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any error,omission,defect or negligence in the performance of such scrviccs,it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City signifies the City's approval of only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. 12) The original dray.ings of all plans shall be drawn in ink on approved plastic film sheets,or as otherwise approved by the City Enginccr,and shall become the property of the City. City may use such drawings in any manner it desires;provided,however that the Engineer shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project other than the project described herein. 13) The City shall pay for necessary soils testing and furnish a report of the test information to the Engineer for its use. 14) The Engineer shall determine the rights-of-way and casement needs necessary for the construction of the project and furnish same to the City. The Engineer shall advise the City • of necessary land survey, Deed and Abstract Records search, rights-of-way maps, and descriptions of properties to be acquired upon authorization from the City. Preparation of these documents shall be considered an extra charge. ARTICLE iL COMPENSATION For all engineering services performed hereunder,including local travel,supplies and incidentals the City agrees to pay the Enginccr a fcc in an amount equal to 2.5 times the salary cost of its employees engaged on the project. Salary cost shall be equal to the cost of salaries of employees'time directly chargeable to the project. plus 32 percent for social security contributions, unemployment, excise and payroll taxes, unemployment compensation insurance,retirement benefits,medical and insurance benefits,sick leave,vacation,and holiday pay applicable thereto. The following hourly salary rates shall apply to this contract: Maximum Position Salary Cost Principal $47.85/Hour Project Manager $34.90/Hour Senior Engineer $27.00/Hour Senior Technician $22.25/Hour Technician $19.25/Hour Senior Draftsman $17.75/Hour Draftsman $12.00/Hour Administration/Clerical $15.00/Hour The City shall pay the Enginccr for all subcontract work authorized by the City at the actual invoice cost. Thc City shall pay the Engineer for reproduction work at the current commercial rates. • 9610500—Conlraca_012898_1ED.wpd -2- 5D-3 In no event shall the payment by the City for all work and services performed hereunder exceed the total sum of$24,280.00 for engineering and surveying as outlined in this contract. Method of Payment: Partial payment shall be made monthly upon receipt of an invoice front the Engineer outlining the amount of hours worked by each employee,the employee's name and classification,and the employee's salary rate along with itemized charges for any subcontract,reproduction and survey work performed during the period covered by said invoice. The aggregate of such monthly partial payments shall not exceed the following: Until satisfactory completion of Phase I hereunder,a sum not to exceed 35%of the maximum fcc. Until satisfactory completion of Phase 2 hereunder,a sum not to exceed 85%of the maximum fee,less previous payments. Until satisfactory completion of Phase 3 hereunder,a sum not to exceed 90%of the maximum fee,less previous payments. Until satisfactory completion of Phase 4 hcrcundcr,a sum not to exceed 100%of the maximum fcc, less previous payments. ARTICLE III. PHASES AND SCHEDULES Engineering work on this project shall be completed according to the following schedule: Phase I: Concept designs, alternatives, studies and reports in sufficient detail to indicate generally the problems involved and the alternate solutions available including layouts, general right-of-way needs, cost estimates and the Engineer's recommendations. Preliminary construction plans and detailed right-of-way requirements shall be submitted for review by the City and utility companies and other agencies within 60 calendar days after Notice to Proceed. Phase 2: Final construction plans and specifications shall be submitted for final review within 21 calendar days after receipt of City's Phase I review comments. Phase 3: Advertising/Bidding Phase shall take approximately 45 days. Phase 4: Construction/As Built Phase shall run for the duration of construction(estimated to be 180 days). Upon completion,the Engineer shall provide one(1)set of As-Built Drawing with.DWG files. ARTICLE IV. COORDINATION WITH OWNER The City shall make available to the Engineer for use in performing services hcrcundcr all existing plans,maps, field notes,statistics,computations and other data in the City's possession relative to existing facilities and to the project. ARTICLE V. PROGRESS REPORT The Engineer shall submit monthly progress reports to the City Engineer. If the Engineer determines in the course of making design drawings and specifications that the cost estimate of$181,000.00 will be exceeded, whether by change in the scope of the project, increased costs or other conditions, the Engineer shall immediately report such fact to the City Engineer. ARTICLE VI. TRANSFER OF CONTRACT The Engineer shall not assign,sublet or transfer,in whole or in part,its interest in this agreement with the prior written consent of the City. 9610500 Cntrxt_012898 iEt).wpd -3- 5D-4 ARTICLE VII. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT Section 1. The city may terminate this contract at any time and for any cause by a notice in writing to the Engineer. Upon receipt of such notice the Engineer shall immediately discontinue all services and work and the placing of all orders or the entering into contracts for supplies, assistance, facilities, and materials, in connection with the performance of this contract and shall proceed to cancel promptly all existing contracts insofar as they arc chargeable to this contract. Section 2. If the City terminates this contract under the foregoing Section 1.,the City shall pay the Engineer a reasonable amount for services performed prior to such termination,which payment shall be based upon the payroll cost of employees engaged on the work by the Engineer up to the date of termination of the contact and for subcontract, reproduction, and survey work in accordance with the method of compensation stated in ARTICLE II.hereof. Section 3. All completed or partially completed reports prepared under this contract,including the original drawings,shall become the property of the City when the contract is terminated,and may be used by City in any manner it desires;provided,however,that the Engineer shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project other than the project described in this contract. ARTICLE VIII. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Engineer covenants and agrccs that it will perform the work hcrcundcr as an independent contractors,and not as an officer,agent,servant,or employee of the City;that the Engineer shall have exclusive control of and the exclusive right to control the details of the work performed hereunder,and all persons performing same,and shall be liable for the acts and omissions of'its officers,agents,employees,contractors,subcontractors,and consultants;that the doctrine of respondcat superior shall not apply as between the City and the Engineer,its officers,agents,employees,contractors,subcontractors,and consultants,and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint enterprise between City and Engineer. ARTICLE IX. DISCLOSURE By signature of this contract,the Engineer warrants to the City of Southlakc that he has made full disclosure in writing of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of intcrest, including personal financial \mow interests,direct or indirect,in property abutting the proposed project and business relationships with abutting property owners. Thc Engineer further warrants that he will make disclosure in writing of any conflicts of • interest which develop subsequent to the signing of this contract and prior to final payment under the contract. ARTICLE X. INSURANCE The Engineer shall not commence work under this contract until it has obtained Professional Liability Insurance as required hereunder and such insurance coverage has been approved by the City. Such insurance shall be in the minimum amount of$250,000.00 and shall include coverage of Contractually Assumed Liability. The insurance coverage prescribed herein shall be maintained throughout the period which Engineer furnishes its services hcrcundcr and shall not be canceled,modified or altered in any manner without prior written notice to the City. In this connection,upon the signing and return of this contract by the Engineer,a Certificate of Insurance shall be furnished to the City as evidence that the insurance coverage required herein has been obtained by Engineer,and such certificate shall contain the provision that such insurance shall not be canceled, modified or altered with thirty(30)days prior written notice to the City. ARTICLE Xl. RIGHT TO AUDIT (a) The Engineer agrees that the City shall,until the expiration of three(3)years after final payment under this contract,have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books,documents,papers and records of the Engineer involving transactions relating to this contract. The Engineer agrees that the City shall have access during normal working hours to all ncccssan-Engineer facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section. The City shall give the Engineer reasonable advance notice of intended audits. (b) The Engineer further agrccs to include in all its subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that the subcontracting consultant agrccs that the City shall,until the expiration of three(3)years after final payment under the subcontract,have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books,documents,papers and records of such consultant,involving transactions to the subcontract, and,further,that City shall have access during normal working hours to all consultant facilities,and 96 I 0500 Comnd_0I2898_n;DAspd -4- 5D-5 shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space,in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article. The City shall give the consultant reasonable advance notice of intended Laudits. ARTICLE XII. VENUE Venue of any suit or causc of action under this contract shall lie in Tarrant County,Texas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereby have executed this agreement in triplicate originals on this date, the_day of , 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DUNAWAYASSOCIATES,INC.(ENGINEER) By: By: 6614 Mr. Rick Stacy,Mayor Jamcs" . DcOttc,P.E., R.P.L.S., \Vice P csidcnt Address: 1501 Merrimac Circle,Suite 100 Fort Worth,Texas 76107-6572 ATTEST: ATTEST • City Secretary Secretary 9610500 Contract_0I2898_JED.sgx1 -5- 5D-6 FEE SUMMARY 1. Love Henry Court (1,100 LF) a. Engineering S 5,000.00 b. Surveying S 2,420.00 2. Burney Road (2,300 LF) a. Engineering S 11,500.00 b. Surveying S 5,060.00 3. Estimated Reimbursables (reproduction, etc.) S 300.00 TOTAL S 24,280.00 9610500_FeeSununary_OII998_JED.«pd 5D-7 ESTLMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST ATTACHMENT 1 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION LOVE HENRY COURT 1,100 L.F. ITE,`I UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE COST 1. Earthwork 500 CY $3.50 $1,750.00 2. Cement Stabilization 4,500 SY $3.00 $13,500.00 3. HiVMAC (AVG 2") 36' wide 500 TN $32.00 $16,000.00 4. Curb Replacement 2,200 LF $5.00 $11,000.00 5. Hydromulching 100 SY $0.80 $80.00 6. Utility Adjustment/Rel • 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 7. Drive Reconstruction 1,200 SF $10.00 $12,000.00 8. Pavement Marking/Signage 1,100 LF $1.00 $1,100.00 SUBTOTAL $56,430.00 25% CONTINGENCIES $14,107.50 TOTAL $70,537.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES $5,000.00 SURVEY $2,400.00 9610500_FeeS ummary_01199 S_J E D.wpd 5D-8 V.4 C"..";•7".....E2 ;•.:••• :.A.., .; ;;I';'1 ,---____ ---- -..L.7,-- ,7-----. .---- .A.••-•••" '' --- ,r-71 ,---.';'— i; . — 4 ; . Ci --;.;••,,,_A-5.--r-* ,,(.1.--?-',..,.„ i_,._±-i. .c::..„. .';a4,;-.!•;Cc. ,,,i. ; . ; - ? ''''......-; § _________1_,Xi.r,a,..../ , 41, -, .,,,=•: CA-,cre B V:OK 1 t! i /,/------- is..„..) d'il . 1 •. -----2: 5:1,_e:'-' '; I • .r1 2' (7,-->..? ,... cIss• .Li 1 1 : )1 „ I ,, •;. • t•-4,-'f,'i i .• ; 'ci i S 0 U TH I .11—\KE— I I ,,,-';',.., .,,:,':, ,-; I : ! : , . •,-;„,j..7,..-_,•,, ::-, ”. , 1 , 1 ,.77.' i• joRENa LT -'7-7-.)/ / . 1,1 '.'-‘;•;;';---::.;11--_-,-. r________,t.,,i / 0 i -, z-17.ce •.. r c••,, ------ •-. 0, - -'<_....!•,,:::,.. '... :,-----;- ,-- e, -, 1\'— ..,1.3,,E-,E,Ay w - , :--.•., . _._ .n 1...7 . ecc`;''-i.,',S-',1 1 c.,. ....: ...-Q:4 — ...,. 6 4 z.'.. .... . _ ,..,,i .., h . .-,..set,,, , ...x,, CE.t.---4> •Zs,,,,,9/.___, : ' .„1 _. ..._,,.....„,,,,...e.______.,i.. , 1 t• / ; ' ; .'.'7' --7--t --li 1 it3 .4.- 2 I ;,,- ,, ,, f;;-1__ ( cOS ‘6•• -4/-. .1.: I ...iv 3 -' a E..,•-•,....7-2,,...• \ 'i(- '-, `-;.:.,,v ,ii-' - , 1 _ f •. 1 = I ii7ogl o i..., SOUTHLAKE:EiLVD e:r. '?‘ \ 1:1'hiNs01.4 •.-. 3 ,Chapel femeter/ F I 9- II ,...,3,...;,--„:1—if'c;( •:"--- is:. 'RST ‘CW' li ,...... 2. .. '5 I u f,..x.;„,„,..trt__ . K 11_, i55,1- /i?.\/1.,-__.,.1 ... 51 .. 1,-,.___.2.,...:0-..44, 2t1,;--'17,- , ' —`•=11--- --'). .o 52' ..: • Goode It ,_ \c- /'", 1-0 ,..! • > .... ... .i.., ! 1- Airport 1', •-•.., 0 Nipsco, Inc. '''',...nt- !L" '''./eeI i f LI,...1c 12Z z , ti ,... _,:e.,'• .-;c,-."4'1-`-` U 2 - \.....-- 5 -, z I! .,,zAcc.,., - -,:-E.,,00..., .\\ —I ,- ' D Z.1 .. . - . • 2 L.) I „!IUCCQ k• ,Azt,Y4 1c.,, 18(r.--z7. - --.1 t .7.. •i--;-...----- 4..,....9.1...i.\1/41 in!, of'!4,7,... t..,-1 4.,,,,,--7.i r) 3, ;D"---- .I iI9381 I.3.,i W7.-i:Lii'cs-` E Z-• I ,, _, , 7-• = = %..„,,4, „, , ?. :i E .22 20 4.,_", /7 ' = C.C.NT:h.ENTAL 3C.,D w a; . i ./.• CON•..-_,,,7;.. BlvD . ' D --T—T—t: t,7:7-7-72 I ____...._. _.,• ,,e' :1 0 1''' i,., C_ i I:.:(32.,A.;.. • 1..!..-r. ':;-:i 1•4,;•(!;i:..:7" , -- n. .: si&-.. 1,...,41 - ,,1 '"-i 1 Isian-cc< r .,.,,......!r.:;-•., - --. i ::-:.:i i .1--, C T il '.... -- / ( ,.-.... / 'i /-',EFFE-„,,,—, . \ ----" '',-----,.r.ry s-,:•.,---. ...,...r.f - ..." • /''..,-.;;'' \ 1 MCITPEL:E?;JAY " "Pr:1.0y. •s . • , ,c...?c,„ r 'zr-,. .- rmt 1.3 T-t. ,42-7:-,-., ---- , .; . ; 6 =Qtr. mrma, ',.7,'F 7,1,4 rl t.ti 1.1,1.4"r'e c A • ' 7- : it.-.-.:-,41-7:7-,,-.. i 1 "...C.''. 7 . '5. --iv 0.....:1 „., , c, , „,_ ,. c,....> .,. !_i /..._ u. ---, :c.,,,,,,,,,-,?C.:,„ `...":;.:?.RTIS)C:i, ---- ' 45 'f-) ;"iai 'Et.,15-1. ,.ev;,,,:-- -\." ee'' ..a I\ !-' zi.-4 ' r'---r_•,,.:•z:011,,i'l:LLI ;, i !d I 5 ,..—_, i Creek ; ;SAGE3RUSA x I, ... II .,,... _____,...-----,__ _, • ........_ . • .t 1 CC L,t,t.'153tTRS .S.:_.,? .ct; ... 4„ •,,.. 11 • i-P ..; 4 ; cHtsjp — ! .. z -Q.L,.4. •_...-) t. ,. Il .---i.------_ - 1 KELLER • . 1. 2 Pi c.: .., .- 1 BANDIT T?AiL '..71. •'2 -ic \ 8 C-6 \., .?. I./M83. WEEP ''i• I3. Lt..,1 C i ! It, F . ,... \IV TRAIL x -4 1 Q..."7 z / NfOHN McCAIhr 7 L2 o CC. f I c • X.' N COLLEYVILLE ..../ .,.. ,. • ...c.7. ....i t.-, - . -"=./ / 11,.:,-...?......,0eii •-•"....-...•vii..ice....,-.:7-c.-..veve.iours.... J. .... -4.............te,.....016....4.S.W..V.ladf.o.a.fgr,A IIKOMP.i.:.0.1.,.*!•14!...-4,11...earlf4a..N.1, ,...,,,,, , gra,- SCALE IN MILES K CONTINUED ON Mck?j9 SCA:...-::N FEET x 5D-9 P ____,_ ________,..______F____=_•_,, 0 ,,, vi :3 ;,;: 0 .C3 2CCO 3CCO DETAIL MA?SEC:770,1./ 8.7,c,( STARTS ON INDEX RA DE 143 `�-- ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST ATTACHMENT 1 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION BI RNEY ROAD (CARROLL TO LONESOME DOVE) 2,300 L.F. ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL 1. Clearing/Grubbing 2.6 AC $5,000.00 $13,000.00 50' R.O. V. - 22' PVMT 2. Earthwork 2,000.0 CY $3.50 $7,000.00 3. Leveling Compound Type D 500.0 TN $32.00 $16,000.00 4. HMAC (AVG 2") 22' wide 650.0 TN $32.00 $20,800.00 5. Culvert (24" R.C.P.) 180.0 LF $25.00 $4,500.00 6. End Nall Treatments 15.0 EA $300.00 $4,500.00 7. Hydromulching 8,000.0 SY $0.80 $6,400.00 8. Utility Adjustment/Rel 1.0 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 9. Drive Reconstruction 11.0 EA $500.00 S5,500.00 10. Pavement Marking/Signage 2,300.0 LF $2.00 S4,600.00 11. Detour Signage/Marking Safety Flagmen 1.0 LS S5,000.00 $5,000.00 SUBTOTAL $88,300.00 25% CONTINGENCIES $22,075.00 TOTAL S110,375.00 ENGIEERING SERVICES $1 1,500.00 SURVEY $5,060.00 9610500_FeeS ununary_011993_IE D.wpd 5D-10 --- ..1...r .7- / '4 ,-.-„:,-,,,...F.:-., c,,, ..,•,'3,7 71 ' I • r ......__._____. _______ ______ -, 12 ---!:, \lift, r s-.------->\-- 1 B C :.' ..''. • ',, C ': "_:-i2,•' ,, ., . 1 . 1.7. ,..c..„: !, I. a BC S .:Gr. ;; I= , \ ) Crapeoine loe • , .., Va.. "-mama •. I rem. -,1 ,,,,rt . .— Pwn..), ri kawaca -i'• -4 '''. G r ' WOSE NECK . lii-Er': 1 1.1'f• '.'=g; - • . ..-". oMapsco, Inc. - . Walnut Grove Park — . - •tAt . - ..M I . , -.--.. •1 4dsJ • n\ f - lUENT0\ COUNTY : ....... ... \,... TA RAN F COUNTY 1I ICO, .... 1 • -.7.OR c, LAKET:OE , C '' SCE44 \_" ' --.------1 t I-.•_____, \4 ..,. ‘...... ,..., . .,!..'-:.. ‘r,,`;.; •,i- Meadowmere,--a.,. ' •. W I L.. 2 - dal* ei,,, ,,z1 • w,-, ,..; _4, ,:r-----.--___• 0 • -L--------N.,0,I'l c --C' t,,c:!se I, ., --------- \' s- .':.:- I t v \ HA r..,,,R aiiiitg.am H I T E '4 I N G -s1 i il- tlaguna Vista •0,-, I-2---7'-' -— 11 N , EILL:ET.f.AL 10 lz, .2 .z • , --. Tatt.k.' ' -. 1,IP-Clw 17-7. ';' • -• 1 , 11 -Ert. -----1--,01 ,, s- “ cA,Lioc.'Nf4-?77-7,-.:°:°:.'°T ..__.___..pka •-,..- - bi ,8 /r I .m`,, R:cr.Ei b`t c\i',C.2a• : ...,. a:',.. ''Z's• 2_:741/4, j t v e_...;:i.0', ___.—........c...1u:i s,:‘ ORAVE'..._q? ,.2., GRAVELS..„,- , /; ,.., .c. - e- ,1 It• I - I \ J . . ,c) O.:A IL o I i,-.. CO : . • 4‘,1 L-TA YLOR ., c,. n 1. , , . : . . . 1.... , ,...! x, i . .... ,,,.....,...i, ., ,.. ,...., i .31...0 IR, ,..., .•.,/ • ' .z• I Ei , i s VMS.* } 1 a t\1_ , DOVE I S I 1 1:,, meadowme e Park -1 -------' . A,..,. .. .. u . 7 9 - • . -....... c (-:,--23 /.....:.:LF.T • , g ‘, i ,..,S. .. " 5 z\; .,.,,,, (t 6 souTHLAKE .. zi u. .....• g,_ : ...., ,•=\;_.,, ...._, ,.... , Lc ... 1, T/...;: l'.1•:•':.;?:.'i ' - 1 .Z.' S7,• ,,..,c.,;#7,1 in! !_....:______S:.E•, 3-• c.MIC 4' PR:MPOSE ::2---:-::; ...w''17 j:94'...."1,i i :•;:-°e-,.. j. `,::'i IPickerng.—ww 's Park ...-... _, I •R \ '''-' `-Nt 9\ 1 ()i C.‘''''' \•. 1,....:! 'e•-•.;e". I .I A/ .4' I.'" Y WPC SPERM ____-.._,....•—.. S' ,--<1D..', . `'.......- t , F,!-NI-I,IYITLEs=-'"-‘;',7••• I k- Z,"-»- 1 '"-----"'":I.- '-'1 • SCALE IN MILES. = NTINUE0 ON MA? 26 :4A':. 50_11 7-- ____.--.._------- ...__.._—_ ,.....r.....:::—: — 0 ,,1 ,„ 1., ',-. TAIL MAP SECTION 0 v.:: ... . .... 3- C'GO 8COR?A:',E 1012 ..,,....,-,,-.S ON INDEX PAGE 149 ENGINEERING SUMMARY ATTACHMENT 2 LOVE HENRY COURT/BLRNEY ROAD A. Land Surveying (Love Henry Court) 1. Field 20 hours a, $90/hour $ 1,800.00 2. Office (reduce field data) 13 hours 'a; $47.70/hour $ 620.00 SUBTOTAL S 2,420.00 B. Land Surveying (Burney Road) 1. Field 50 hours ,a; $90/hour $ 4,500.00 2. Office (reduce field data) 12 hours Is $46.67/hour $ 560.00 SUBTOTAL S 5,060.00 C. Base Design Based on 8 Sheets (Both Projects) 1. Covcrsheet 2. Overall Layout 3. Drainage Summary 4.-7. Plan and Profile 8. Paving, Culvert, and Headwall Details SUBTOTAL S 0.00 D. Drafting/Research/As-Built Plans 146 hours a $50/hour $ 7,300.00 E. Engineering/Preparation of Bid Documents 40 hours a $90/hour $ 3,600.00 F. Technician 80 hours :a $70/hour $ 5,600.00 SUBTOTAL S 16,500.00 REPRODUCTION,ETC $ 300.00 GRAND TOTAL (DESIGN) $ 24,280.00 9610 5 00_FeeS ummary_O I 1998_J E D.wpd 5D-12 ENGLNEERING SUMMARY ATTACHMENT 2 LOVE HENRY COURTBURNEY ROAD A. Land Surveying (Love Henry Court) 1. Field 20 hours @ $90/hour $ 1,800.00 2. Office (reduce field data) 13 hours .. $47.70/hour S 620.00 SUBTOTAL S 2,420.00 B. Land Surveying (Burney Road) 1. Field 50 hours a $90/hour $ 4,500.00 2. Office (reduce field data) 12 hours v$46.67/hour $ 560.00 SUBTOTAL S 5,060.00 C. Base Design Based on 8 Sheets (Both Projects) 1. Coversheet 2. Overall Layout 3. Drainage Summary 4.-7. Plan and Profile 8. Paving, Culvert, and Headwall Details SUBTOTAL S 0.00 D. Drafting/Research/As-Built Plans 146 hours @ $50/hour S 7,300.00 E. Engineering/Preparation of Bid Documents 40 hours @$90/hour S 3,600.00 F. Technician 80 hours 'a,$70/hour S 5,600.00 SUBTOTAL S 16,500.00 REPRODUCTION,ETC S 300.00 GRAND TOTAL (DESIGN) S 24,280.00 9610500_FeeSummary_011998_JE D.wpd 5D-13 City of Southlake, Texas -- MEMORANDUM L. January 30, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement i with Carter and Burgess for a Geodetic Control Network BACKGROUND This proposed professional services agreement with Carter and Burgess provides for the development of a Geodetic Control Network. This project will provide survey monumentation on a one-mile grid with the monuments tied into the State Plane Coordinate System (North/South and East/West control) and the United States Geological Service (elevation control). This grid will provide for better control and information for consultants and staff. .C) The current system consists of benchmark files developed by city consultants, many of which were "temporary" and have been disturbed. The proposed system will provide control for GIS and will provide for better coordination of development plans. Currently, plats larger than ten lots are required to have references to the state plane coordinate system. The proposed control network provides more accurate reference points for this requirement. This project will also aid in the preparation of new topographical maps. The monumentation will provide more accurate information for the preliminary drainage study. The States topographical information is inaccurate in some areas, sometimes up to seven feet. The proposed cost of this network is $29,400.00. This amount is provided in the FY P P 97-98 budget. If you have any questions, please call Melinda Polley at extension 816. RECOMMENDATION I i Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a professional services agreement with Carter and Burgess for a Geodetic Control Network. Please place this C 5E-1 thr, item on the February 3, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. , CRE Attachment: Proposal Proposed Survey Monument Control Network 5E-2 , 01i 16, 98 FRI 16:48 FAX 12146385632 CARTER & BURGESS 002 - ci: Carter n Burgess Consultants it Planning, Engineering, Architecture, Construction Management, and Related Services January 16, 1998 Malinda Polley City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Malinda: This letter is to serve as confirmation of a proposal by Carter& Burgess to establish a Geodetic Control Network for the City of Southlake at a cost of$29,400. A formal proposal and contract defining a specific scope of services will follow in the next few weeks. Sincerely, CARTER & BURGESS, INC. - 1)� ry S. Vedro, R.P.L.S. GSV/kan 07730.GSV Carter&Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elrnbrook Suite 250 Dallas,Texas 752 47-495 1 (2-4)638-0145 Metro(979)7A3-2019 Fox(214)638-0447 5E-3 01 29 93 THE 10:a:; FAX 214 1533 0447 C & B 74:00" • C Carter .. Burgess Consui7artts in Planning; =nninieerirc, Arcritcc-uvc Cor crLi:t^+.r. Ma,n,aaerne^t. and Relcrec Ser''ces January 28,1997 Ms. Melinda Polley City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Reference: Geodetic Monumentation Networ{ for the City of Southlake Dear Ms Polley: Carter & Burgess, Inc. is pleased to present this proposal for Global Positioning System (GPS) Surveying services for the city of Southlake, Texas, to establish a city wide geodetic network. The scope of GPS Surveying Services is divided into three (3) Categories: Geodetic Monument Location -A joint effort of Carter& Burgess and the City of Southlake to locate 49 suitable locations for the geodetic surface monuments to be set. Both parties are necessary in this portion of the project to ensure the longevity and effectiveness of the monuments being set. Field Services - Locate a sufficient number of National Geodetic Survey (NGS)) Monuments across Tarrant, Dallas and Denton counties to reference the Southlake network to the National Spacial Reference System (N.S.R.S.). This is done so that in the event of part of or all of the Southlake network is lost it can be replaced and other information based off of the network retains its validity. Build 49 surface monuments. This process consists of drilling an eight-inch hole three feet deep into the ground, setting a three-and-half foot piece of 5/8-inch iron rebar into the hole and filling the hole with concrete and placing a domed aluminum cap with the city name imprinted on it atop the iron rod flush with concrete. The finished monument is typically flush with the ground or slightly below the ground surface. Static GPS surveys are run to bring N.S.R.S. coordinates to four of the surface monuments built. Static GPS allows us to make direct measurements from NGS monuments to the City of Southlake monuments. Real Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS surveys are run from the four surface monuments reference to the NGS monuments to reference the remaining 44 surface monuments to the N.S.R.S.. Multiple references to each of the 44 surface monuments will be made to ensure that the network is homogeneous between any of its points. RTK GPS will produce positional tolerance of two centimeters (0.46 ft) accuracy. 11. Carter& Burgess, Inc. 7950 E!morcck Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 7 5247-4951 `.214`,638-0145 tv'.etro(972)263-2019 Fax;214!638-3447 5E-4 UI 29 9S CHI 10: .53 Fk.\ 211 ii39 OUT & ", 1)k1.1.A5 T003 Ms. Melinda Polley January 28, 1998 Page 22 Field sketches of each location will be recorded. Office Work - Post process Static GPS surveys to derive N S.R.S. coordinate valves for the four surface monuments referenced. Process and calibrate RTK surveys to derive N.S.R.S coordinates for the remaining 44 surface monuments. Create drawing files of the field sketches for eacn monument. Create a data base with a city scale factor for the N.S.R.S. coordinates. Develop a report on how the network values were derived. FINAL PROJECT DELIVERIES Upon completion of the project Carter & Burgess will deliver a booklet containing location sketches. N.S.R.S. coordinate data. geodetic data, scale factor data and a report of how the network data was constructed. COMPENSATION Carter & Burgess proposes to be compensated for all Surveying Services described in this proposal on a '`fixed fee" basis. The fee for this proposal will be S29,400. The project will take six to eight weeks to complete. Reimbursable expense such as deliveries. reprographics are not included in the fee. Carter & Burgess appreciates this opportunity to write this proposal for GPS Surveying Services to serve the City of Southlake. We are prepared to commence work shortly after a contract is signed. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, CARTER & BURGESS, INC. onK. Per y, F�fl.L.S 07733.GKP 5E-5 City of Proposed Survey Control Monument Locations LEGEND • PROPOSED MONUMENT LOCATIONS • EXISTING BENCHMARKS AND REFERENCE MARKS • EXISTING SUBDIVISION BENCHMARKS SOUTHLAKE CITY LIMITS I -MILE GRID STREET CENTERLINES PARCEL BOUNDARIES f Public Works - GIS N W E S Locations for existing benchmarks and subdivision benchmarks were derived from given x,y coordinate values or from detailed descriptions of their precise locations. Every effort has been made to assess the proper locations of these points and accurately place them on this trap. Proposed locations for survey monuments were derived from analysis of existing benchmarks, a 1 mile reference grid, current zoning and land use maps, street intersections, and the future thoroughfare plan. These sites are orelhnivary iecotmnendations only and not to be construed as remesentine final survev control Doint locations. I T.W. WNG AT WESTRARK LOOP 2 - N. WHITE CHAPEL RD. ATSAM Bess 3 - SW CORNER INDIa+ CREEK SuEo;..a` 4 - SE CORNER OAKWOOD Esrwres y 5 - Boe NG JonEs RD. wT T. W. W R - N. WHITE CHAPEL, WEsr 8— ADD'N. ♦ % :...........:.....� - _, 7 - r—OOD DR. AT PRECD1cr LDIE RD.- 6 - KIftK1Y00D DR. Ar SwM SCHOOL RD.- 9-H- 1 14 wr T. W. WNG 10 - KIRmvOOD DR., FuruRE DEvdoPMrUrt AREA :: ,..:: :, t;; ._ 4--•-�-� 1 I - BRIAR LN.• HILLTOP SUB'O. 12 - HARBOR RErR1 A RD.. BUR— PL SUED. - 13 - W. Do Sr. AT N. PEYronvlu.E 14 - E Dove Sr T N WHRE CHAPEL :..... 15-C,wa—MIDDLE SCHOOL .. .....:.. ..... -. .... ,1_. 16 - 60UTXLutE/GRAPEVINE clTr uMlr •1 .� 17 - NW COMER REGAL OAKS SUED. 1 8- N. WHIrE CHPPEL T Hsrr 1 1 4 . 19 - N. LARRCLL Ave. AT P—ROsE Ln. .............. 20 - RatDOL MiLL DR. Ar KInGSWOOD DR. 21 - SW CORNER BURGER ADO'.. -(..........f,~.............. < _- 22 - DURHAM ELEMeNT'Aftr 6CNOOL 7/} a, +•--`s ,�.,.'\ 23 - HIGH— ST. wr N. WHfrE CHAPEL '-""' �`--__.._......_:.. ,t ' 24 - JOHNSON ELEMENTARY 6CXOOL ...... '---*•••••.•••.... , . :- .; 25 - E. HIGHLAND Ar N. MBa.L Ave. I I 2fi - N. PEARson LH. wrKIFLORencE RD. - /. 27 -BICENTENNIAL PARK 2B - 3011THLAKE C_ HALL ! ; ".«..•'""•) , �..1.,.. �"� ._`.. ..... i :.6......._•.. - ::: 29 - Hsrr 114 Ar SHADY Ln. ' ' 30 - N. PEnftson Ar JOHNSON RD . 31 -do-so N RD. wT R—L MILL DR. �:w.. ......... .;. i......-!-___ 32 - CPriRDLL HIGH SCHOOL ..........._._. , 1 O + 33 - SW CORNER GINGER CREEK EST. > ! t Ll i 34 - SOUTHVJtE BLVD AT WH CHAPEL �--; . ;,,.::::g:l _..;••" r_.: :........ ...y. ....... _ _ :: I 35 - ROGKENBAUGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL .........:....,.... 3fi - E. so�THLAKE wr N. CARROLL ..:..:... ., ♦ ., ,�._..,........_�L..: i 37 - 60DTHLAKE ADMlwsnunve DFRICEs , ,, �� i,�. ;) , ;. 38 E. SOUniLAKE T N Kw Ea,; 39 - E. 50lfTHLAHE Ar Hwy 114 .; � � 13 - 14 _ 15 " 40 - COMMERCE BUSINESS PARKPT 41 N. PEARSON Ar UwoN DHNROH : �-" .. _ rd:r.�- 42-DAVis BLVD ArW COemnENrAL BLVD. ..^`^:: >... �.-:.Y. ..., i-L..•..... 1. 43 CauoLL ELEMENTARY ScnooL < .. ........_ Y 44 - SE CORKER SODTHLAKE Hats SUED. ` ' •^�� 45 - W. CONTINENTAL AT HIGHLAND Dnxs DR. rr'r-t-; ..,:: ' '• " •1, 46 - E. ConnnErR'.u- ATOLD CARRo- RD. �.: •` a"- ev.:. •x• ' ...... ........ • . •.-i' ,. F t 47 - E. CONRNENTAL AT S. WMBALL Ave. t ........ 48 - S. WMEALL AT H1W 26 .....Y:�....... Y B .. .. 49 - BRW INDUSRPARK ._ ./ .."I ... ...... .......... !f. ,'i T j .:I •: :t':i � a' z . !3' is ::: !�::.` :i �� •I::! 25 20 .:.'. 22 ,k 24 e } ,.. ; ........: qr t f i r p � . is ;:.. :.. .:.; .: r ..:. . ; _..... y�y r^• r- — .J ;�;.:- ! I :..... , 11 Y T .. x � s � . .. i .: !.t.: ::. >..... :Y -.- .. s .; is r�.. t , .:! ` t _ 7' y-t "�,. • ^t ♦ Y A. . S: ? 0 2 4 Miles City of Southlake, Texas I MEMORANDUM i:;) January 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Acting Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to enter into Professional Services Agreement Amendment #1 with MESA Design for Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase II In November 1997, MESA Design Group requested SPDC approve a fee increase for basic services due to the expanded scope of Bicentennial Park Phase II project. This request was based on their estimation of additional drawings and details that they felt would result from the expanded scope of the project. SPDC tabled the request and directed MESA to show more justification as to why the increased fees were justified. At the January 19 board meeting, the SPDC again considered MESA Design Group's request for x increased fees. MESA presented a summary of the proposed additional services that would be required due to the expanded scope of the Bicentennial Park phase II project, and the increased fees resulting from those services (attached). The additional fees requested were $39,410.00. SPDC approved the additional funding. Please place this item on the February 3 City Council meeting agenda for their consideration. If you have any further questions, please contact me or Ben Henry, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent. KH - Attachment: MESA Bicentennial Park Phase II Proposed Additional Services MESA Preliminary Cost Estimate, dated 12/17/97 L I 5- I i MESA at_SGGN G9OJP AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL.SERVICES Project Title: Bicentennial Park Phase II Client: City of Southlake,Park&Rec. Location: Southlake,TX Project No: 97043 All provisions of original or referenced Agreement and/or Authorization of Services remain in full force and effect as modified herein. Re: Agreement and/or Authorization of Services by and between MESA pcsign Associates,Inc. and City of Southlake,Contract for Professional Services dated June 18, 1997. Additional Services Reference Exhibit"3","Summary of fees and scope of work" Compensation Total Additional Compensation: $39,410.00 Services will be provided on the following basis. Professional Services(Labor) ❑ Schedule of Rates and Charges in referenced Agreement and/or Authorization for Services ❑ Hourly, per standard rates(see attached Billing Schedule) O Hourly,per standard rates not to exceed X Fixed fee of 539,410.00 ❑ Phased fixed fee of ❑ Other— Reimbursable Expenses X Reimbursable expenses are included in the fee. ❑ Reimbursable expenses are not included in the fee and will be billed at cost plus 10%. O Reimbursable expenses arc estimated at and will be billed at cost plus 10% Acceptance ❑ Work is _ ing by verbal authorization or request from Work wi upon receipt of this authorization. Signature: Signature: Date: J nuary 29, 1998 Date: Name. James A. Cooper, Associate Principal Name• City of Southlake Company MESA Design Associates, Inc. Company. Address: 3100 McKinnon St..Ste.905 Address: Dallas, Texas 75201 Phone No. (214)871-0568 Phone No.. Fax No. (214)871.1507 Fax No.: Please sign and return one copy to MESA Design Associates, loc. l v ctive Pro s',97043-Bicereennial Park-Phs II\Correspondence17o43Au'JiAddBicentenmall-29-98.oac Landscape Architecture 3100 McKinnon Street i Suite 535 i B 152 i Dallas.Texas 75231 ,....L.,...., e,L t UN �� L 00 v`0,'SE EXHIBIT "3" MESA DESIGN GROUP BICENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II-97043 SUMMARY OF FEES AND SCOPE OF WORK PROPOSED ADDITIONAL SERVICES BASIC SERVICES Reference Contract i Consultant Current Fee Additional Proposed $1,350,000 Services Additional Scope Fee S1,910,000 Scope , A..-C. SD,DD,CD Landscape $47,950 Tennis shade structures, $7,860 Architect (24 Sheets) Hockey rink enhancements, (4 Sheets) proshop sitework, basketball court, additional.sidewalks Civil $9,200 Underground storm sewer, $3,000 hockey rink drainage, proshop utilities MEP $12,500 Site Utilities,proshop MEP S4,200 Structural $2,500 Proshop $2,000 Architectural $6,000 Proshop $9,000 Cost $2,500 Proshop S750 Estimator D.Bidding Landscape $6,750 Proshop $3,000 Architect E.CAJCO Landscape 1, $6,750 Additional sitewvrk above $6.000 Architect limited scope,proshop full scope SPECIAL SERVICES A. Survey I Civil 117,500 1 N/A I N/A E. T I Platting Services 1 Civil $5,500 N/A N/A C.Reimburseables Landscape S15,000 All of the above S3,600 Architect Current Fee $122,500 00 Additional Fee Total $39,410.00 F'.;cf,vr Pro)w:tf97t043 $,centennrolPark-PhsIPC-or►ecpardsncei7043Sv►nnco/ybfFeetAndScupr.ice L3 sc.2pt Arcnitectufe 3100 McKinnon Street/Suite 905 LB 152 Dallas Texas?5201 214,t'1 OSES far 2141E71-15O7 MESA DESIGN GROUP !PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Bicentennial Park Phase II 12/17/97 UNIT 9/22 ,_._ 7/31 SCOPE - DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE CHANGES IBID PACKAGE#1 A.SITE DEVELOPMENT I. Grading a. Erosion Control Lump Sum S5,000.00 S5,000.00 S8.000.00 (S3,000.00) b.Clearing and Demolition Lump Sum S2,000.00 $2,000.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 c.Cut and Fill on-site 12.000 CY $2.50 S30,000.00 S42,000.00 (S12,000.00)I d.Stock Pile Topsoil and Spread 6,000 CY S2.50 S15,000.00 S0.00 S15,000.00 2. Site Storm Drain a. 10"PVC 600 LF S18.00 $10,800.00 S0.00 S10,800.00 b. 24"RCP 300 LF S45.00 S13,500.00 S0.00 S13,500.00 Inlets 3 El S2,000.00 S6,000.00 S0.00 $6,000.00 mall Headwall 1 El S0.00 S1,200.00 e. Concrete Flume 600 LF $12.50 S7,500.00 $7,500.00 S0.00 f. Rock Rubble Riprap 500 SF $5.00 $2,500.00 52,500.00 50.00 g. Small Inlets 5 El S500.00 S2.500.00 S0.00 S2.500.00 - 3. Electrical Service 500 If S15.00 S7,500.00 S10,000.00 (S2,500.00) 4. Water Service a. 8"Water Line 540 LF S15.00 58,100.00 S9,720.00 ($1,620.00)1 b. 6"Water Line 15 LF S15.00 S225.00 S225.00 $0.00 c. 1 1/2"Water Line 150 LF $7.00 $1,050.00 S1,050.00 S0.00 d. 6"Gate Valve 2 El S400.00 S800.00 S800.00 S0.00 e. 8"Gate Valve 2 El S600.00 S1,200.00 S1,200.00 S0.00 f. Water Taps 2 El S500.00 S1,000.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 g. Fire Hydrant 1 SI,500.00 S1,500.00 S1,500.00 S0.00 h. Impact Fees S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 5. Sanitary Sewer Service a. \Ian Hole t 1 El 1 Lump Sum' $2,000.00 ' S2,000.00 I S0.00 ' "lean Out 3 El $150.00 S450.00 S450.00 S0.00 J :wer Line 4" 300 LF S18.00 S5,400.00 $5,400.00 S0.00 ISUBTC AL S125,225.00 95,345.00 S29,880.00 7043CostEstimate 121797.xls 12/19/97 Land ""''__' PAGE 1 3100 McKinnon Slree!/Si 5-J- 3 Dallas,Texas 75201 2141871-05 1507 (PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Bicentennial Park Phase II 112/17/9 7 [ DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 9/22 7/31 SCOPE PRICE CHANGES 1 B. SITE IMPROVEMENTS 1. Loop Road 980 LF x 24' a. Lime Stabilize 2,614 SY S2.50 S6,535.00 S6,535.00 S0.00 b. Concrete Paving 6" 2,614 SY S19.00 S49,666.00 S49,666.00 S0.00 c. Lighting 3 EA ' S3,000.00 S0.00 S9,000.00 (S9,000.00) d.Curb and Gutter 5,920 LF S3.00 S0.00 S17,760.00 (S17,760.00) 'SUBTOTAL S56,201.00 S82,961.00 (S26,760.00) 2. Parking Lot(100 spaces) (150 spaces) I a. Lime Stabilize 4.824 SY S2.50 S12,060.00 S18,000.00 (S5,940.00) 1 b. Concrete Parking 6"depth 4,824 SY S19.00 S91,656.00 $136,800.00 (S45,144.00) 'oncrete Walks 3,600 SF S2.50 59,000.00 S9,000.00 S0.00 j c. Lighting 1 4 EA S3.000.00 S0.00 S12.000.00 (S12,000.00) I SUBTOTAL S112,716.00 SI75,800.00 (S63,084.00) 3. Restroom Building/Storage Room 1 Lump Sum S120,000.00 S120,000.00 S0.00 SUBTOTAL S120,000.00 S120,000.00 S0.00 4. Tennis Courts-8 Courts a. Tennis Cburts with Lighting 8 S40,000.00 S320,000.00 S320,000.00 S0.00 b. Concrete Sidewalks 6,120 SF S2.50 S15,300.00 S15,300.00 S0.00 c. Water Fountains 3 S2,000.00 S6,000.00 S0.00 S6,000.00 ) d. Shade Structures 5 S1,000.00 55,000.00 S0.00 S5,000.00 i e. Area Lighting S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SUBTOTAL. S346,300.00 S335,300.00 S11,000.00 5. Hockey Rink a. Concrete Rink Lump Sum S60,000.00 S60,000.00 S60,000.00 S0.00 b. Boards and Fencing 600 LF S50.00 S30,000.00 S26,500.00 S3.500.00 c. Benches 2 EA i S2,500.00 1 S5.000.00 I S0.00 S5,000.no I d Penalty Box 2 EA S1,500.00 S3,000.00 S0.00 ` S3,000.00 1 kiii, :ore Board 1 EA S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 7043Cost E stimate 121797.xls 12;19/97 PAGE 2 ( [PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Bicentennial Park Phase II 12/17/97 i UNIT 9/22 7/31 SCOPE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE CHANGES I f. Bleachers 2 EA S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 I g. Concrete Sidewalks 8,700 SF S2.50 S21,750.00 S6,750.00 S15,000.00 I h. Bleacher Floors 1,200 SF S2.50 S3,000.00 S0.00 S3,000.00 i. Excavation 4,200 CY S3.00 S12,600.00 - S0.00 S12,600.00 j. Retaining Walls 3,260 FF S12.00 S39,120.00 S0.00 S39,120.00 k. Ramps 1,500 SF • S3.50 S5,250.00 S0.00 S5,250.00 I. Drain Inlets 4 S1,200.00 S4,800.00 S0.00 S4,800.00 m. Drain Lines 600 LF S18.00 510,800.00 S0.00 S10,300.00 1 n. Area Lighting 4 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SUBTOTAL S195.320.00 S93.250.00 S102,070.00 11*6. Landscape and Irrigation 1 allowance S70,000.00 S125,500.00 (S55,500.00)1 S' L S70,000.00 S125,500.00 (S55,500.00)` ... Icarus Center Pro Shop I I a. Building With Restrooms(2000 sf) 1 Lump Sum 5250,000.00 S0.00 S250,000.00 b. Concrete Walks 2,500 SF $2.50 S6,250.00 S0.00 S6,250.00 i c. Area Lighting 4 S2,500.00 S10,000.00 S0.00 S10,000.00 *d. Misc.Landscaping I allowance S2,000.00 S0.00 S2.000.00 ' e. Utility Connections 1 Lump Sum S5,000.00 S0.00 S5,000.00 f. Electric Service 1 Lump Sum S5,000.00 S0.00 S5,000.00 g. Misc.Irrigation 25,000 SF S0.50 S12,500.00 S0.00 S12,500.00 SUBTOTAL S290,750.00 S0.00 S290,750.00 8. Basketball Courts-2 Courts (1 court) a. Concrete Courts 2 S20,000.00 S40,000.00 S25,000.00 S15.000.00 b. Basketball Goals 4 S1,500.00 S6,000.00 53.000.00 S3,000.00 'I c. Concrete Sidewalks 7,500 SF S2.50 S18,750.00 S0.00 S18,750.00 ' d. Benches S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 ' c. Shade Structure 1 ( I S0.00 $0.00 S0 00 'SLBT^TAL S64,750.00 S28.000.00 536,750.00 i 7043Cost E stimat a 121797.xls 12/19/97 PAGE 3 5- I - �PRELIIINARY COST ESTIMATE Bicentennial Park Phase II 12/17/97 UNIT 9/22 7/31 SCOPE —1, DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE CHANGES •9. Sand Volleyball Courts a. Sand Courts 2 S3,000.00 S6,000.00 S0.00 S6,000.00 I b. Net Structures 2 S1.000.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S2,000.00 c. Concrete Sidewalks • S0.00 S0.00 d. Concrete Edge S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 e. Bleacher S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 { f. Bleacher Floor S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SUBTOTAL S8,000.00 S0.00 S8,000.00 10. Signage•Graphics 1 Lump Sum S0.00 S7,000.00 (S7,000.00) ;SUBTOTAL S1,389,262.00 S1,063,156.00 S326,106.00 Cc Ytcy S138,926.20 S93,728.00 S45,198.20 r i i .„r,.:ontractor S208,389.30 S71,116.00 S137,273.30 (SUBTOTAL S1,736,577.50 S1,228,000.00 S508,577.50 i .Design Fee S173,657.75 S122,500.00 S51,157.75 TOTAL SI,910,235.25 S1,350,500.00 S559,735.25 Note: Does not include city permit fees. •To be performed directly by Parks Dept. "All unit prices,allowances,and total costs are valid for thirty(30)days. MESA Design Group (reserves the rieht to revise this estimate after such time. 7043Cost Estimate121797.tds 12/19/97 PAGE 4 5 - 1 - p ' CIty of Southiake, Texas MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Requested variance to Sign Ordinance No. 506-B for Diamond Circle Estates BACKGROUND Diane Johnson, President of the Diamond Circle Homeowners Association, has applied for a variance to the sign ordinance to allow for an entry sign at Diamond Blvd. and E. Southlake Blvd. for Diamond Circle Estates. Signs located in the right-of-way are prohibited, but have been allowed in the medians of newer subdivisions as part of the developer agreements. In Mrs. Johnson's appeal, she notes that the sign will help to identify the neighborhood more easily. She also points out that the requested sign is similar to one located across .•1 Southiake Blvd. in the median of Byron Nelson Parkway. The proposed monument sign is 8 feet in length and approximately 4 feet in height and is of a brick construction to match the existing fence at the location. The proposed location is 9 feet from the traffic lane. Besides the proposed location, the sign meets all requirements of the sign ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Diane Johnson's request for variance to Sign Ordinance No. 506-B for Diamond Circle Estates be placed on the February 3, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. /-- /./ 4-1-- -c'" CRE I j Attachments: Sign Permit Application Sign Variance Application Letter from Diane Johnson, dated January 16, 1998 (h.... Sign and Location Drawings 5J-1 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM January 27. 1998 TO: Bob Whitehead. P. E.. Director of Public Works FROM: Charles Bloomberg. C. B. O.. Plans Examiner SUBJECT: Sign Appeal for Diamond Circle Estates Diane Johnson, President of the Diamond Circle Homeowners Association, has requested a variance to section 16-H to permit a subdivision entry sign to be installed in the median of Diamond Boulevard at the intersection of E. Southlake Boulevard. The sign ordinance prohibits signs in the right of ways, however, many newer subdivisions have signs in the median that were authorized by the developers agreement. Due to the development of the adjacent office tracts it is less evident this is an entrance to a residential subdivision. This sign is intended to assist people in finding Diamond Circle Estates and discourage people from turning in looking for commercial properties. Please schedule this appeal for the February 3, 1998 City Council meeting. Ms. Johnson will be present at the meeting. Attachments: Sign permit application Variance application Sign Drawing Site Plan 5J-2 t--1----I SI ___W? a_?rICAI:ON FOR SIGN . ERHI _ (hose City of Soothiake ✓A_.-. �4 • 'I , 7 ADDRESS OF PROJECT .�z �1t.:t•.^,.,,,. C�` t k' -;+�� •y: 7C '; y v� y ,'� TENANT •i1 ivC�t, :��L �! 7A .�^ ^�i; L �� 1 ?HONE NO. SIGN COMPANY ?) 6 t er r t' r . a,� i PECNE NC. ADDRESS address city 4 ..I ILLUMINATED? ' `�E� NO (circle) ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR r �L_t � ECG PHONE /i :` ,-4: . TYPE OF SIGN Permanent Temoorar-r Dimensions ATTACHED 3ANNER 4 HEIGHT POLE BALLOON i✓ . WIDTH MOrii:`4ENT MODEL HOME AREA OTHEE. SPECIAL ?URPCSE ; • ?77-f OVERALL HEIGHT . ^•`-t3C:.ed, pc_e :!lonumentj • SET3ACK;5) FR t4 R.O.W. =,? DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: Piot Kan .- Sign Drawing Letter From Property Owner OF `ter"' ician`Regi.st at_on •a�ia�Ti.rit_. � :\P?Ltra_j.-, ,ir•. hh �. !�"Y' �. J L. f -. --~— *sss . # s# * *14:4,4**tsttttsTtitstt tts#** ' " rvsss A ? ..ICATION a??ROVED BY: DATE: PERM:T FEE COMMENTS 4(:) 5J-3 C:Ty O. GC. THiA+E 0 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION ?ri ;ant, G:v'.ycr ; �:f zIg ADLR.ss: 'c :-3 i 4a r; I• )A ) PF(CNE t'. :.r�_ �.,q - 4f 3 J3 six: 5c?/Y;e The £a21c wi^q _ ._?;na ti on oerca ins c eaves ed: n cte iocat_cc for w. _c t ? as-;azcA z be;^a NAME U BUSINESS OR OPERATION: :lar6na (.4 r�i' 1=1=ornec xi;er`s Asscc . irISICA ADDRESS: —11:e •�edt 1/1a -ft, i i;-revs eebe- G I. �i a rn e:. :,EGA:, DESC IpTIOt: : Lot Block Subdivision I her by certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 506 as summarized below. t further understand thatV it is necessary to"� I have a representative at the City Council meeting who is authorized to discuss this recniest• address any unresolved i;,c 'es, and approve changes, if any. Applicant's lcan t's Signature( L4-U�_ trf14 i %1'�- n �^ t<r#i'.Y#}*i•***:i+r**:rl , 4i*x<tr#<*.'�MY)hA41U, } Datc-: �1 19�7 For City Use Only: hereby acknowledge receipt of the sign varianth a^_lica:i i n and the _:`1 on toi. the da o f- Tit]e. ** ' '******#*****#Y*********t*4 i*.!#**<******i e m##<*#t t i*t*<}**Y 4<t*tit* The following checklist is a s_.trmarr of _._cuirements for sign variance requests as required by the C:ty of Stu_:lake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance N.,. 506 and amendr.en=s, and other ordinances maps, and cedes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to th' requested variance 'see •.:cached. Site t__a:: showing the location of to s variance _ sign v__-_ ace request and any other sicns that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R.O.N. Seal--se and dimensioned elevation; of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs. the elevat_cns sha71 show the building, the sign_ for which the variance is recuested. and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. IC) 5J-4 Demonstration Ir Please QP_mo-"k ate t:r_Y= rhP. fn 1 7 nr .. I re-- �PC� r � _ T G 1 .� YZ e:S' dZ'E.' e�"C T iCe�i.! to the That—. :'hat a literal erfcrcemeri= of the sign regulations will create ces h an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant . O!M k.�{ --A''41.-" . t 04 Z L�-'`e 14 C 'r.': / �t C 4�-CV,I / rL7 ��,' v Aa,;,,,i fA. f ALA, 4/Zfc- .LL i 1',- L -,,C-1 f ,U 1 - %-"-p- . :, j , 'v' . i,I,t / ,.1,-t ti f v ✓ c, U �s, t " � J 2. That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unigZe to the affected property and is not self impcsed. 11,�. .4,�4t/ �.;�f- law •tt t �'&dL . G��..,t -- . .o. itut -4,i--rd'i_ej (5A---17kt, NAA.-1/2-, n ti,-6 .0 --. ' e.-e-•- 0 N,a,-.-Q),. 0 o 3 . That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted dev 1opnent cf adjacentproperties . J1Y L l:.- • •.•j it ,/it i,:.L.:1— '�4-7,_,. .1,,,1e�% 1,i,i . i",4.< ... Q,1A-C'A ,h/'k ,)1IL/ t J Ti ?/0 , F_4 e)Lt,7c ! J G'at; /r' . '�i�'' -0\/v!Jt v vR `t - . That the :•arianc�w 1 `� n �'be in h ':ton:r with the spirit and purpose of the sq ;=dinance . i c , L C:;var6FoRMStAPPs;s_01 •rAR.sr:D 5J-5 c . DIANE T. JOHNSON 823 Peary Drive c ut lake, 7:i 76092 January 1(3, 1998 VIA FACSIMILE# (31.7) 438-5097 City of South lake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 A1'FN: Charles R. Bloomberg RE: Request to install a monument in the median within the Diamond Circle Subdivision; Intersection of Diamond Blvd. and Highway 1709 Dear Chuck: I am president of the Diamond Circle Subdivision Homeowner's Association and am writing to convey our request for permission to construct a monument with our subdivision name on it in the grass median near the intersection of Diamond Boulevard. and Highway 1709. A few weeks ago, I talked to you about this situation and you instructed me to complete a Sign Variance Application and an Application for Sign Permit. Both are attached hereto. £ understand from our conversation that you will add a site plan to my application and that you will attempt to have this matter placed on. the consent agenda at the next City Council meeting. I further understand that there will be au fee associated with the construction permit or variance because we are a non-profit homeowner's association. As you can see from the enclosed application, the Monument will be on the grass median inside the subdivision, will be 9 feet back from the first white traffic line and will be very much like the monument across the street on Byron Nelson Parkway. Please review the attached and let me know right away if there is anything further that needs to be provided to the City. Also, if you can, please let me know what you think our chances are of getting this matter on the consent agenda. L 5J-6 City of Southiake January 16, 1998 Page 2 Thank you very much for your help. Very truly yours, Ii ane T. JOIV son President lL Diamond Circle Estates Homeowner's Association (H) (817) 329-4343 (W) (214) 508-0858 r uI x_�-;arias.' Pfi,taRrr 8UC34l.111. L 5J-7 . 1 C . 7 (-NIA ) r ; JD" r� /1 i_ '^- a f� C . it- 4,,, . ..„---\ ' J ' ,,, (.! , ; . 1 . .. i T:".....,7- . lt --I i I t ''.." Z.."'. . . . 1 1 I 0 (g-- I .. � m _ . 1 ! 4. , z...-. .(ilt: I - T> C3' ‹..$).. I k:‘ - tro n ei ol -0:7 . _0 X :i. 1 _ 1 I • 9.... :t ; . 1 y.s, . : r) .2 Ili 1 4------'-' i • VA/ )‘, s_ \ - II. \ A- Ilr. ,C;. lr' {. \il, k � i 7 710 ,c0.7 ` \i' i c. ~ R s =, ?-. —1 IG t ci ') —0, 1.7, n e,eic-- ,ff tt-\ ctiq ggigi P -z ‘.? -\ - i4-41t \ 1 0 1 c' A /1 .).f.D .J .., tk.1 X% ..., II` r , `N . ter`` IA ! w! '' b 1 1 ? r J �I 4 i4 t'_•i _ _' --i il k -. .? t 101 114 -4G LO-d L999-017S-L18 dOOt19 -I 13NS3Ud 3H1 d80=bO L6- tZ-Lnc 5J-8 . . . , i I, c• g 0 ; . • ii, . ' I } AV . , . . i r I : • I . 1 . . i 1 ja?.fAivry, tj Li Si—r V4A....10.J.,,A.L i ‘ 's, • e .•.. •• _. , I , . , . ' I 1 . 1 1 i ! i . i 1 . i 1 ! 1 . ' -1—N : .1 :. g.: i . i : ': •i • i •d•.t.' ; . : C . . • i../ SJ-9 c'oIJ laayS NNVIId dOHS011d SINN31 all-1 Mys aloo 'oN 7oalwd 86 91-i0 0,08 P.4..go JVl —0 wa s' O c r m ---I X N uogogq6ay -all a1-0 --N :uo!c!wy n m Z = m Z rn D _ r- LoSI-IL9 :--j 296o-1L8 (YIZ) I CZSL SDxal 'Scllco W6 aUnS laa315 uouuiNorl 001C 6viuuold puol u6laao --4,n am}oa�lyo3y adDOSpUCI J60210 NOIS34 ,,%Iw_ �r.oK7 [p1wwd-00 'M0 13Y MD" OI L33MM 3a TM IH311TKYYn — Ow O311aa'OW Y ICSI'O H3 w llI0H11M •JM-Yy] YMI 3 35n uo 'ON:i1d0o 'KIOYIOpad3b lWl 3ORU 3A'.KOM 3. A ub3dU� 3H1 S. n-0�6 1tJe5, , ow ? An vm SJOVO•I uamoM sloporl ualN woog S,uawoM i ! I I I -.... O O - WOO'd s,UDIN ,�j�j N9-�Zl X Lr6 ;�1. I I C �--� _ ono Pl!4o /8upaaW: I 1 ' au!43e14 algonod 3!uva {I I ( I I j j WOld paJQAOD I I ! ! I I I I n%npr!M II y� l a3yy seed I I ! °1tl'rq 1 _ J !eaj�laal3 aaedg aooLj leal:) „4,0/9,9-,V aoll3O JS oLzz «Q„ OluauoS : C[Oqsoj(l rI kz � n.r `qJ r< MXW4VDVKaVO"ALL- [O—✓ 1 roN :aa4$ 2 Lp NM:)3S 3/W.V?11.suu 19 1llOAM ADDOH a411 1aa4s alo0 'oN Ioa!oid 96-S1-i0 f►9L6 Latloa40 7yf U .A0 m O 2I m �I m X D Ln urtataEaa wall a;oo 'oN suo!s!,aa l I m Z En Z m _ r— .OZSL .1 'scnD� 906 al!^S 6uwucld pLD; u6saa uoq,f) a,^loal!4D,V adoxpuoj dn089 NOIS3a %3w— �o woo r13n anal aA✓YaDOa 'Y ,N Mn Ol 10)'9l5 33 11 1N3n3Dw YJx. 1NY or a3lawww 9 JIY11LL1M D1 ~ SlH .1D 391 OD AM 39Dd" 3NiYW-V I HOd „ 0-,0Z — „L ry, 10 1D31 3d0'P 3H1 A 11L '13 3111 S. 'S I:NOr6 IOS30 3W DKt :VY.Ylq SYLL 3113021d 3DN33 a21d09 �INRI I�3d 30 M 9V-115 Q3ThC15N3� 150d � A8 03/,Oaodv 33 01 W31SAS QaVOc a34£v0 - 11.9'3H222Y1L' 03 W315A5 a31KV0 NO 50H3d30 9NIDVdS 0aV00 D3 I-.91 3903 WN 9NOW I-,91 03 03103/35 D3 190.1 301Gd aVII NIVHO 1SOtl 0N1H36 `03bY AV -Id 9NOlV 30N3d H91H .£ -woo CNIH99 30N3d H91H ,s 3:N3d H91H .5 r_3 11 11 N V I N 0 d W i Av- hM39 a313W1a3d .£ M �d V 03NN01 1 d A 'EO''Jl = 17311H7aV 3dVOS@:`/� 1 'LO-7'1 t 513315 L3d3a d G cr"o db' 34 Ol = W31A5 QaV08 a3NSV0 5iIV130 NOI1:ila15NOD aOd III 1 H V 1 a O d W 1 1N9130 2-GY YA q 27QJ tl l NIVHD a t=3 A d � A'NO 3sodald 3nuvalmn aoi A'm Flom Munimn and „0-,S = A :31VDS r..._*�\ N011DIS - SS3D:)V 2101d1D36 '8 'd3AVld .I .!�I!I! � y 11P la U_ O 1 -I1 o-.9 lo-,zl .0-.9 1 .e gala A_A z Z L S� p gz Z t�i 3av119 Dl 3d015 „l :31VDS r N011D3S - X09 ,SN3,kVId NNIa .4ZIX; H S n z Va9 D (` 3001 3d01s x ffnn Zyyj r (yill � 1 ti A-m 3sodald 3nuvalmn and „ 0-,S = A :31V:S N011D3S - X09 213d33�13W11/213NODS3 D `.INIa A3�IOOr1 m � � (%:! F p t, I A Wa30 SNIM31A O@Y_ x�� Z�nAn ��N r-I A D�x� =y yoD0 F iA �n Op Awo 3sod" mnyumn low „0-,OZ = „L :31VDS N011D3S 11bVN3AO - NNIN ADIDOH 21311021 9NIM3 n ¢' �, 5 12Y17J A^DI'JOH x3raa $ �_ S� fn 1 �A? 9NIM31/y yDn D �i x�n � D `-I (y i yADy> Ap P O p a p� z � r 4T1D NOMW "vumn aw x-,OZ a „L -3ld:)S I/) /M 31130?Jd 3DN33 12 (INVIDS NNN wv3e a3L3wla3d da3a ,E eels 03NI:o1SH31 lscd V A9 03AOaddV 3B Ol Y13151-5 OaV09 a3HSV0 b 30N3d YN11 NIVHV y Z �ml �x�zOzy In �t1'}0p'O>f �Q61 ��t�p G DPI x��z� NN2 N�PQ �IroF IMDF P� z02 IQ, zi ppx DPi ip2 ;R aM Z rn p" r >n HAON „0-,OZ =_ „l :31v:)s , Ndld inoAd1 - SGN(10mns 'S NNR1 ADIDOH 2131101 w P D'SfKeW% 16YO&RAIUv LO-lS laa�$ M♦ 1 31NVld1 11 NA 1JM . )_ J_s OMO .", :_a(c,d 26-9-4 Ef'OL6 4-0 ufNaO K3, 9661 w4✓A.00 'MOLLx —'r 03 0. 034e d 9 IIOS).'A lt3l,ttN. UgN,w. O m Sao !0 35n 110 ':x�d0] 'NOIIT3aD6aL1 3x1 1'131H3tF 3dY,50N/1 3H1 ,0 u16a0tld 3X1 M.M01K x0630 3N1 0r0' �r6KN0 S6LL caaaav0 �V1c 0 AD/dM5 dd b �N 6 d A ;a d — pe A — d _ s,rsinay b d � A b b D ZN;-lL9 °x0! B9S0-ic9 ia1Z) t OZSL SOxa1 'SO:.CC S06 4l!OS taa,1S uouu!NON :.._ 6uiuu0ld pv0I u6isa0 uoq,0 a,ntOai!40ro *dDcSp.-j d6080 NOIS30 %3W. !14 I dVW NOU • ' �•••" •;vial • n • .. :�ii�i lmn • • `•`'1 It DNRJMD39 30 1NIOd „O-,OS - „t :31VDS Ndld 1N3WdOl3n3❑ 311S / � r ), t i (•pole 3�IVlH_LnOS) 60Z1 W3 i i i Sl O f --r lI Tivauwa aavni SWOOUIS3*d onu .lu O 2 million %e•• 1a an- 0s G 0 13SVHd DNIXaVd JNIISIX3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Appointment of Reserve Firefighter Michael Sullivan to the Southlake Department of Public Safety, Fire Services Division. We are requesting that Council appoint Michael Sullivan as a Reserve Firefighter for the Southlake Department of Public Safety Fire Services Division. Michael Sullivan is a certified firefighter with the Texas Commission on Fire Protection and he is currently in school working towards obtaining his Emergency Medical Technician certification from the Texas Department of Health. In addition, Mr. Sullivan holds a B.B.A. from Texas Tech University. He has successfully completed all background and pre-employment testing requirements and we are confident that Mr. Sullivan will be an asset to our organization. I am available for any questions or comments you may have. 6c. BCibls 5K-1 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT January 30, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 97-177 PROJECT: Plat Revision - Lots 2R1, 2R2, and 3R1R, Block 1, Miron Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner II, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 2R1, 2R2, and 3R1R, Block 1, Miron Addition,being a revision of Lot 2, Block 1, Miron Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1252,and Lot 3R1, Block 1, Miron Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3901. LOCATION: On the east side of Miron Drive approximately 130' south of East Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). OWNER/APPLICANT: Gary Miron CURRENT ZONING: "B-1" Business Service Park District LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Office Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Three (3) RESPONSES: One (1) response within the 200' notification area was received: • Jan Miron, 1695 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. P&Z ACTION: January 22, 1998; Approved(7-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated January 16, 1998, amending Item#1 Id to allow the 56' R.O.W. as shown. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated January 16, 1998 with the exception of those requirements in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated January 30, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-177PR.WPD 5L— s ! i i --_ 1 I \j1 I 11 i' Nr•-• -..,,,,,,,IT 1 .\ ,,,,, , • ! ______-_____. ______- ;Ce 1 . I . I /••I\ . .r--"4---"5,4 ,-- 1 HALL N I / 1 ..- • ._4 / I III • i 11 . 1 ') !i _+iteio2:.__ 1 gri;M- ....., , ii„,., .., .... 1 ,, ..., ,_, / 9 •,-; WE -II. 7-7; ; Ill I ft: --1, ' ' ( ' I —I 1.---4--. 1 1--- Ir- NI \Icaziak op42 t \ *A 1 F.0\C44 \ \ idt rk Pr- , ----- It.'og owl( n \ L....„ _1 1 I ..; 0 vala ELM) LI 7 I , : -----) ' 1 • G 1 ! 50/341 (9 Ali 1 A I er.•„.# . 404 Iii111111111 0'4 111, ! 44' j ___ __ / lio• '‘Iii '11(4111111111 71- - \N - -all. II 0 11 - CIS II 11111_,,1111111,111 1 MIt-c"e ,-- i _.....„ -7-----. : ____.„ t I .,,it 1 . ..7 .17.--, ., • ___----------. , L, '• - o--i r-----1 1 v. . , \ / , 1 .: , , , vim. i . . ' 1 H ' —1154.kittifije i la_ill r )-) GRFII455' \---1,' ' \ .f; Aill 11111.11rr Agra. ' ' BustEss _Lisu.s..412, re--\,, al . • ''''',-;:r'iii_i '' /:72, II 11111 I . 1 — i , I I I _ -- :- - L...f_ : • 1 , 11 I• 1 ::;___:] • .'-' • '•0 ) W4°1/4:1 — _ • 1 ' ' — i tiatillyrr i — Tugis64 I — -4.P.,,,, li C'169 j41Q4 — _ , c L Pv- /-.06k • I . u I1 I 1 ..1 I TRACT MAP -- - :\ ..... r r 7 I - ---1 .1\ i 7 0). .A N v _ ~/' — 1 C7''' \� � c \ - I cc D Q I -- n �� Q i I \ rn Q7I o® cc,... N Q NCI) cm O . . 1 2 NY \ J0 O CC N Wz Zz I-- 0 7 Z N I 6E9 oN NVN47211 V NHOI w 1 1tt 'R U 0 I xO $ N N CD 1 O 12 1 ® N, Q 1 CI N N i 1 ®I 1 N co tn YN \ I \\ !r-1 " I > .' N M s7 f-4 H ¢ I 't` I �' 1 I • I ` L.r__==. I iLer i I y o N m <� CO CO in n o a ,� `J r N ��N I (r � �-2 m �O O N (} �" u, i � / \ ...71 T r ` .( ` - -tc><_ — _ J Z1Q w m .01 N -( 1 m 0 Z - . . N 'Cn _ co. CV Q ® N- cJ Lii. ,� I U 4 r7 = [fin �C� �= Q N :,� n - al I -IN ! = �i N . Q I U �� --- M r') 8 Y - N n - a: Q Q cD O $ I I vcx «t cn Cr cr I " a0 ® r. N -1 e-• V. Q R •- N N _ g� N _I, -I rnI - O =1 I to I .,r I SR 0 I t c,.t or up L 1 ICI O� Q N N csi !I a I L-3 t I Mt Rt Y..ttroy Du,N , ! 'o m :m • :: : a- a a- a 11 C1) 1�'/' .1 is a ra 1 r r �i ii. E!1 i`!I ei�, - c o N i:li6 �� i' '� '� ;l ' ; . 'i _'!ilt� is t3Q �,1.' u m 6 IN a 2.41..,' .; � �j_ II 1 �I l iff. !I ,t l!� !W ` L m o o-z- r 1 ari 1i /1 xr ,I II: x! x - x xx I Ili - 1 >m a 9 ° a,6 9 i - !!i 1.. . i p J� "° 1 3' i 1I is fi i: i�; I 1- 1 y I- >-1 3 ,� I m c, -s - s 8- is F •-i !i fl f. Ili I':. +- ! .r,'i-.� •! 1 : 6: ax e: e F- l_ i{i! tI :!. i'i 1.. _ 2 . ' 1 ii -rx!r ,. 3ili .1 7) e - .. f I/ it Ii as! i1'I! a1� ° ;! ' ar•F' I! .3E i;I! 1 - 9 9 0 i ` Fit ; !1_ ! x- s ! I! 41 >„ 1. ,.1 _i rn $o e i ➢; �+ `- ix: �t` �ti �i: �iE �eaF! fsil. ,,,��I i; i1 E- f 1 1 I :-'-i =i ai' a-!:!/ ii ! I ri - i11411 11 ! ai a o o a e . '-li. d !i, 3.1s.!aJ 31: 3i li 3i 3i il of '. iir I. o a i i iilsi'+ i1 37 1•'!eI i.j !i!: e 1 1liFicf '1 1il II : ve ve I yy cc $1Yr :el gill l ZE- 1.s! 3�F 11 OCT' f1` ! a r !II1 Z, if i 3 0 IEY -• - '' 1#a1# .� e n ' ! t" a11. S 8 fill .., t- i r;f' 8 1 F III!! . 3 .s ;E « f # F a Ip • b?; i ; 0 ei ;6 :iv'. ,� %1111 r - O y- 9 4 i+p R F: f• o € h C a$ +�1F=10 '+.� III i s 000z•oar E - ',---Io3.9R_ )_-. g T 1.' j r ^a_ ;�� I % orrs..-�- so'a..an w.roc,.x�.a»<....v,.r 3 z is 71. "y e lr R al,l =.w-.'�n'3ei"',r.4: m-'t• '��_—--='°` y i y ' J .�^.R • 1, Ilitt YAION DRIVE W \ S x li • -- r *� �dn ^�} u s �.____�_lY'eutowG tM [�- is WW (1J !t'i �6�0 EIS -, Hti ^Y fF ' nl I a YWZ , _ ,,_I �. 1 = i Z j L As eco, n+ �_ aF a -- �.IE "•tea— --3 J--i *+.,� w -a��Ri x •�. .Q I. ^ ., • e. i�- �' !R oe g- IA, I _ y AA ..55, a..x 7 ••• W' IW g< 1 171;1 .6Q.a. !-I64,000 ii f •` i tit. '$8 = ,41.C,. 0' _), ' F ni Ass I_�"•...,1�1 �r.� _...i�_——stu_.__�_7,i... .Z.- rn--ia,GI : —J'" 0 3 e i 1 �i- Jai,. I iI t'►yh' (11100."- i. C � 1 - 3 y�E33}si �6 11": NZ 11 f Nurl.• .axeRrx9 %8 p $;ili a!' : .r O��® 1 ' a11sfi.Qe1 UDC 93EEf:Ef%e O : ?.Ris i " • aZ . I !c•. gy � 8nv • . • • . , . i . .• 1 di .... . ri I ��i 1� ile t. `-S 4.. { ,1 Ia !, , , if I,i iab l011 !a . .a•1-E:.. .s.t ={ . i : ; s;i ,E . ! ji �NNjgq :1-- t{(: " i_i ! s• it' a S ./i i 't s ■i S} -ii �j�tE� 1 C �1e--x,( 1! t'is � . x :i ae! �!- � . l.t 't { C +a y tf F � !�,.f:txi.:• :!{ .:. =t. ; 1t x ; . =t . Isa 'E" �' it ! x• t:i 1;1 -.. !11 x:e{ i x!! E ii iix . !!I = t l� t Ee� 11. �J {' 1J��Et-a!3! 11ii i !tI 1.iC I ■: Mi i (• 1 ' l{. _ 1ii:' si:{ t-{ !" ti 1� ��,� rt•..� •i i.r ii�• x�.3 { . �i •d 1 E. QQii4{Itia: "i/i °,i , i . ! iii i ! 1': t i ! E_ }1P.yye a A ' ti _� :� i f•• ; e. =It •= EiI' ! ('E 'i 9Llrii; •lip 'it eli ; } i i� ii!: - ,• it } i +-.{ ii. It ��! �1,j 1- li! g i- .S } .=i, lii LI .tla1 r ,lt ,lc 'I, it 1 i'11,1 if Ili ' sari. {- ,: ,F 31 1 p i�(it-Atti itl. a r.! ., ''!a' . .t ^4i. . it li!t t I Ilk i ii i / 130 I �•i...- i o . i_.L4 a.- EH 1-V i S• II•a 1. {:i 1 E'i,I 1.ai �' -!.••i:ii■ i,ait1:;t 1•i a'a[�`i� si 5" x{sp I. rub t{4E�1. 1i t•il11 r{u I t 1.i. e !filar i.t !ila Si{ 1I!i a-i,�31 a! =i a, =a== is a,a--tE sit as 1-sal ii } ! it•, sit • ir1i, iv ti\ ; ! .t . !-.1!.i li= i -i ! i §. x } •. .. A s'-Y•s :sly'- [ 1-a !- (x x f•!1 x ={ (5 �i■t � i � �Ili!_"1, x E1 1h f Et itlg {.a i{, E': h {i y] ,� a.;. cal5 ( ' '!{is xi'} •x=({ i`E Y , • _tail li Il! is ! !! tt • n ■ i + '1 �� lass a t._e t i••{: ._ :■! t a i`i 1! E1SE ii:I 1,tia _el. . ■• 1i/: 1 (` t F `2.3 1 �! F.1 =e_ii:it t! •. 1:{l •E. , a+.ii=: . i 1 E IN x :t WE A..'3iii!{i aisi•i== i{Ir le:i-6R i; 5.�i PP' ■•.j n4 t::i R Wail �� i �i t E i {�S E t I C: a..at `s; f�i,i.ea :?it'i�•0 is i ii�' ;itN�a o it pa i`t MI i� a_ y •(!i ''' i h 1'iii=p41,ltc. i,El file qqia'1v o•1%-p1 p••li-;/= II pp.la}'..i!yi-: �ll�li - t•r/!',! - VI1VI }l!i�i •j • i5aMid.11:.:._i:l.l .?:lile l:ii!a!{i!i!S!hiil EC lilt=-6 ate.i liliit: = El: i:ii: a a Y = i lei 4. 1 kl 3.IJ � ga _�! I- Pit 3E 1 'Hg �' rE i 1 of 13 it � �!l , 14 '- ,,, g § i 11 ff Y • `11 - - l:F a 9:;. s p — R' ' -- .ez'OGG- •'I\ 3.sE.z0.00S - ... n mpgo:g * * p as Rbl • � - : R•i orN.ok / ii R - R� _1 ! I - nT• R --7 °c e-e.3 i t T L • 311 ti . � i - ;21l1 tit 't. �iE T (IFEi• Cil F .1. 1.e r.i P `-.� ill 7 • `tit iry :3:- , ,I s _ hi M i e� i S ,1 I Ir. $1 . =�'• „y ^�'ivg ''• i■� 1 �S "a i13 h . - t u, ) h: 4 . Eel . �f�,`, e _. .r.•,Ei 6[L _, 3.dti.90 0 l ies a {q 1 a x e eA , 9 III.EE 1,3 Lq:I 'ilt.=i ■ eli_i x i• '"lt { 3 a a ems ill iis, F . E 6. p r 'e 1 = F_e ppj t t! 's :�'s ii ', ' I` at■Ia ••i 1.1; a1 ii;=1!(i.i tSa i bae e1 as sa loi i - l-,1i-h ii` -,E I gni • !1•rai. ( )1 t !i- �4Sitilia'i!'ti� ti_ r1 e::r ;E :,�a`� ! in 11011.1 Via id . I. 8 I ea,?!a + ,i Wa i .id ll+Fai{.`iatiiii!t• tii I : r :4 it''Ii brit I.- iEt' c0 J• 1\ 1 l l ill {ca_l:I.'!!j� Ei• :P ., 1 w ' i i✓f_1 Ali 3t yig�iliS1 I I di a: ? h `o ill�� H I i fii.,.i!.i I. -1 1i • U �I L . * u, 7 1 �` I .'� ;_ t.r}E !IS it i�i°�iii'a t!t't 'S .J CA S 5 i ,sit a t.i=l'-i alaii—i.:'l`. •h•' Si=1=A a iita{l•al:ae.__ .t. a..1' II'-=- 1 1 6 :Of!!E i;s ,'�jar��lE{# '_ E aE{ -3! iliii-:.lt{.ale::t .. 7 S L - s .1i5; City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Lase No: ZA 97-177 Review No: Two Date of Review: 01/30/98 Project Name: Plat Revision , Lot 2R1, 2R2 and 3R1R, Block 1. Miron Addition, being a revision of Lot 2 and Lot 3R1, Block 1. Miron Addition being 1.849 acres out of the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Gary Miron Ward Surveying Company 175 Miron Dr. P.O. Box 820253 Southlake TX 76092 -Fort Worth, TX 76182-0253 Phone: (817) 481-2507 Phone: (817) 281-5411 Fax: (817) 488-2023 Fax: (817) 838-7093 Attn: Waymon Ward CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT(817)481-5581, EXT. 880. 1. Label the POC for lots 2R2 and 3R1R on the graphic. 2 The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description: a. In the description of the shown Lot 2R1, 7th call from the POB, the bearing for the north lot line does not correspond to the existing plat(Cab A, Slide 1252). Verify the correct bearing. b. In the description of the shown Lot 3R1R, 2nd call from the POB, the bearing for the south lot line does not correspond to the existing plat (Cab A. Slide 3901). Verify the correct bearing. 3. Move the lienholder's statement for Lot 2R2 out of the metes and bounds description. The statement should be placed above the signature block for David Ewan to indicate that it is the owner who is certifying the lack of a lienholder on the property. To clarify the property involved, modify the standard language to"'There are no liens against Lot 2R2". 4 Confirm that any existing structures are adequately off-set per zoning district setback regulations from the proposed lot lines. Provide a separate survey or dimensioned exhibit showing the location of any such structures or note that all such structures are to be removed. 5. Provide a 5'UE along the east property lines of the lots. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\97\97177PR2.WPD Page 1 • City of Southlake, Texas 6. The following changes are needed regarding Right-of-Way dedications and interior street geometry: ‘111."' a. The minimum required width of a non-residential local street is 60'. Provide an additional 2' of ROW dedication along Miron Drive. Graphically depict this dedication and adjust all building lines accordingly. (P & Z Recommendation 1/22/98: amend to allow 56'R.O.W) * Miron Drive has been approved previously as a 56' ROW on two separate plat revisions. A revision of the northern portion of the subdivision was approved on December 1, 1992 as case number ZA 92-56 and on June 3, 1997 as case number 97-037. 7. A "Certificate of Taxes Paid" from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing. this plat in the County records. * The signed "Avigation Easement" with metes and bounds description must be submitted separately in addition to the plat prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original signatures. * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. Denotes Informational Comment (111.rcc: Gary Miron - 1675 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 David Ewan - 28 Upper Lake Road Oak Ridge,NJ 07438 Martin Schelling - 601 W. Wall St. Grapevine, TX 76051 Ward Surveying Company II C L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\97\97177PR2.WPD 5L 1 Page 2 i . E E ; : • . •.:...-. .: .;.. :::. 1. : ::: ! , E0 .:-..13 ..1 : Z 3: : i : : 3 _ E ••••:. F.: E-, ..-...E.. .: :i - : ?! - 3,;E: E = ? :: : • - i.:.: : . ...1. 3 .... ii.;. '.,,i;:i: •, i:i -..:;; , :::: ;:'. :::: ...-.:.;7. i E:.3.. . ; Fi : ; ; ..',°;.'... I .E!.;: ..3 3-.'• ::i : .'i. iii •1:1 E :43 1;1 _ ... CL '... _.:1:E 7. ...- 3-: = : :..E: E.1 I ! ''. El :. ' -- E. .3' 1 • - - : (iii , i'''E::.i7!! -7i.'; --;:".! ..1,Sil!..- '1 ; -.I'i. i! 1 i ' 1 . !. ,!-.il: ' : ! • 1 . . . ;:::,:.,. ;: .K...., !..,.. 2 : ;zi i i " .. ; ; i ; '.... ; ; ..: i .. '•.: • i 3 . "I : • ' '- i : 1 i :.'",:i :...• :7.: ..::. : ' ?E :-"..z i : i - ! ....:I: 7 .: : ; : • E 7: ; ?... '....: -.3: p::::..3. i.....: ::-; 3 ' ?CIE =.3. I : : i sE. `.1, E =3 : '•--, 'A's,. ; f„.:: ..:::.17".:. :: :: • .".• :'- 1 ; : ? ..!: 1 E.t!i. =7. 17.! i. „ ,,...,,, . „.„:, Zi ::. ;.f. :.'.7: 1 • LI Z .t .• . i '"!5 ES • . i = ES i iEi ; ' 2' . * ** f• - ..: :::-...r: .1:• .. 7 7: •S : ; : .:E e : . E..:e: :-. ':' . . : :- EL" :E -: 7:f . .... ::.: - '::-- ''''° -..El.i:i 1:-:-. i. : t: i.: F. ' : :` • - ' ..' : 1 : i :. ::: : •': :-. ff: _::: 5 t. : ..1.. rf .3 ' if- - ; • - - - ' ; : : • : . - :-..::-: - . . .,, 7:: •74:::: %. Z. Z Z : f. ''.:: il . .T "..:Z5 i Z r .. i 3 - .7. i :. - -"' : e : . : • .:, ' c.„2 :.....i'i :-... : :. : . : :: :: ! • , : "...• 1 : , ...., - 77•;,• 3 •Ei :.....: .2 ? :. : :- - ;.1 : : ?•- ;- i : . - ....-- 3.,:Ei : F. •:. '... : 2 i i 3 : 3 . .. . . :•"- 3 ;.;. :" : ; 2.?.. ' E.'''.- 1 : : = : : ?....:E 1 1 !,..*: ; - -. c::C '.1.:E•-;-, = -i: z: il 2 : S ..4-.. I = : • : 51.---i: .: :' . i ! ri- ,J.: . . ... .... i c"-.1 :7:-.F.,. i ,-. . .'. i% ! t --z i ; -.. E : 371 73 -1. :-;It 1: I i -:':"... ''.F•i , •- •= ! : r - - 7•1-: ::_ : • . E L .. , •..„„: :z: E 53.3 : ': :3 ' : _: :. ; : . .... :a .. ;;E:: 7 • 1 i. 3 : :11 '- iE. I - El .',f i ; :: i ';:-. i 1..1 :jh :i til: ',,,• i 1 ' ::;'. ,,,• ,,i i',7, ; .;:, :: t 1 EE : ...'. E : . ; 7: i : : 4% .-g, - .1'; •:. S 1 !-: FS : ,..i. f 1 :ii ..,. i :;; ::: !;.. i.! ;.: ! ,:-. i if, ;:z; ; 1..',.. ; =.,. =..i :.'•I ii .., '- r.f; 1 : ''' 3 •tis. t.:!. i :7- :1-:::-; : -! : : i; ::; : I 2: 3 Es : :::: :SI li: ::, I; :: : i f.. . ?. . : li;•: ;1- : ;; :.i-.E ; :."-.2 l'. ---- ••• • •• ••• ••• •- • : : : i -. •.....E: : . :: - - ..: : -..:• 0 ! 3: '-'• : .iE'. = 7 " " i I-;:! ;j; ; ; ; '5" ; ; ; f• '...'; -',.. !.. !-.'•:- .`..i ',":11 ' 5.. •#.5. it t i--.1 iVii; , 'N..- I --''-: ?-..i'‘, ;. r.•/"";• E: *-7. ; ! ? T ; 2. TOL:, ',F d.;''• ••21,•;"':.: •:-.. i; •*. Z-:i_ g ci '-- 34`,1' ,E . r• _ : ..., I,s: .• 7,./ - .;.. .. .... ... - n;.r. . 7..._ ,t :••• 4'.".-'7'." I 7...1 :4 .IVIL.I.1 w '' E "'..':, '- ' 1. - - ? • 3 ;., ^ 1 ---2/1,.- 4:1:-,,c,-11.t.;, -.---;•;' --- - ',71 e.' z 9,4.E ?-.;7]= ::11'-•,--- T.q , -, - - _ 3A10610. NOblIVII- - --' It '4 t- -- .‘ 1 ; g \ : 'e•-.4• ..' . •, ,1", --4,,ti:- . - I14 i i '../.: ---- Fll p 1 cji 1 NS' 1 ; ; • " .?,;:z.: . ' :3'12 - ] ii ti : ..., 1,,, 5 : 1-5. 1 : . --- .e.., I; 't• .I ; i- : i.- 0 : i- - ; ‘1110t 1 1 ii. • =• . . -. r,-: : : ; - . .... _ .. . r .fitr--,,. • _ -,._ 1- ,.I :', E.i. ' ; .••• g•iwill I 1. 1 Iil :111'11!11:111111 ili .• 1 1 • .1 .1 1 t: 1/ !! 1.1!ill".11,1;11 le iifIliii1; 111 ! iiffilil 1:1111 : i: i. A 'Iigl . 11!,i:1 Ii. 4 1 il Igliiiiill!ill;I: I /I i g 1, ,11iilit! lli .11i . i ''''`..... - - ; 1 :it l'.. 1 1 ! .:Iliti'iitlitItil111; ilit 111111:-tililtiliii! ilit 1 i,..E5.:.1. 2 1 I § I Vil ) 11111'1111111 •Z; 3 g-i; Ili itD !Ill'illiiii 21 ii i 1 i City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Approval of Southlake Crime Control and Prevention District FY 1997-98 Annual Budget. PUBLIC HEARING. • On January 21, 1998 the Crime Control District Board met with Staff concerning the budget for fiscal year 1997-98. Attached is the budget document that was presented and approved by the Crime Control District Board. It is essentially the same budget that was presented to the Council in September. An overview of this budget includes the hiring of two School Resource Officers and all the benefits that accompany those hiring, two vehicles for the S.R.O. program, and funds to acquire the purchase of three tracts of land for DPS facilities in fiscal year 1997-98. Utilizing our best efforts and consulting with our city realtor,Dee Ekstrom, we estimated $7.50 per square foot in purchasing two three acre tracts south of F.M. 1709 and one eight acre tract at $5.00 per square foot on the north side. The Crime Control District Board was informed of the study that was being undertaken by Phillips Swager Associates and they felt that this would provide us with enough money to deal with those undertakings as recommended by Staff, Council, the Board and the PSA study. To paraphrase one of the Board members, Jerry Farrier, this allows us to cover our bases and it is hoped that we can achieve our land acquisition in a more economical fashion. In dealing with the S.R.O. vehicles, I had originally recommended the housing of Crown Victoria's on the school campuses,however, the Board felt that because of the uniqueness of these officers and the duties that we were going to ask them to engage in, accompanied with the versatility of the vehicles in association with school functions,they wanted us to add an additional $12,000 to the line item account in order to purchase two Ford Expedition-type vehicles. The actual budget figures reflect approximately $800 less than the $12,000 authorized by the Board. In the calculating and compiling of the Crime Control and Prevention District Budget, we utilized the same general philosophies and budgetary procedures as in the normal Southlake general budget. We have discussed each of these items during my presentations to the Council, then to the public and now to the Board. The Board passed this budget unanimously and we request Council's approval. I am available for any questions you may have. 1 ee. BC/bls 1,1 7A-1 ,. \ co L _ , C a . C a k , , E c u • 2 £ l- E ) co k j o = � _ o_ _ 2 c 2 E 2 e o . kf E / \ a @ al Cl.) a) Tr) � ' c ° o $ 2 CL CO 2 $ a) mf / o co co ° 2 41) 0 2@ ■ k a) E - G 2 D / e a) 2 a) J I a s E o = ¥ c. • 2 2 m 2 co ui U % -0 Q E o 2 8 2 m w e R 2 / $ 2 f ƒ E 6 § § \ k 'e $ c \ 3 2 f ° § 2 2 2 \ / k \ k a o 2 CL : f & Z c) 0 0 0 0 0 CO - % ep § Cl) 2 0 7 ° c a 12 0 E c o 0 0 0 c0:, ƒ _ $ k—I " ® "M I « au,[/_ / w U Z L a) o 0 0 0 E / CO 111 k > & U- } ) Q o = r o 0 0 0 $ \ § ( § \ \ LL k § I O k k 2 co e N. r- w a [ co e 0 ƒ e o a3 z11.1 ) / / / a c U Q g E E a_ / # o § co a) k u) % 5 f 6 - Le' IZL—.IJ: k } k 7 2 2 2 2 / 0- -) 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 E. - / 7A-2 a) a) L co co m cE co > L L a) C 3 L L C 7 O 'C C O N • L 7 U (73 C U c « E IY • . a) a) 3 7 � w. (p � V co O- O a) c C 'C N •O j N c Z. O a) N w > C O aa)) a. 3 > 3 y .N o (o o O. • o en o �' v CO IX W To 5 U — c U -c c a) (ri aa)) L,. r w O O a) (n m •N N c EA a) y a (p w O C (9 I— C C U) L u U) .c L O Lo '> LU O O a)• 2 a 0, g, O a) N E O w 0 C (� �. cD w' L a) N 'O - O D C c 4.. C �O L a) O a) co a) CO O O V) a) co C uu)) O m — co 0 o a) C U CO cTL) al I- a) a) a) 7 > u) 0 0 w E c 3 a) U o— ) 2 0= co) >. o O as cc a3 I— aa)) a) acco) U) i ° . N c8 r. o 0 .0 U) w 2 c c 7 c N a) .0 > C - N '- a) (p a) c r7. L en a) as N >. en C) 2 u) o - O a)N c) Z U (� U E CL >. - o 3 = < c..) E uo) E» YZa F w 0 0 0 cx: 0 0 c W N rn w (n ao 8O I- W CI) >- c O Dn- cc p 0. wcQ 0 0 0 0 #Q 0 o -J . rn F � U o LL a N U- Zu_ Cl) 0 0 0 :0 0 o 0 1-1-1U 9n a IT) o 7' 2 N (>i Or o CC co 0 0 O O t:')> O O O LUJ Z rn w w Y ~ o J > LL Q m I o D (O O N fA;• N 0 N O co f� N;. O Imo . rn co M Eh: in �- -:i<U U) h.co 0 N Pi } I.— LL a) C N .-,iii 2 O ::C cci J� i 0 (o Z w :: 0 Cl) D '^C) a) • 0 O 1— `) Cl) C 25 0E- 8 = >ID:,;,/, c 3 a co Q C-2 a) C d Q O E E `: ' E E p (Illarw' ~ UII ct ii2 fi ... . w U w U U U H d -) 0 O O O O O U M Q Q 0 �- N N N N CO CO 7A-3 • o 2 (iliir' 8 coo = U N Cr _ to O o p a) 2 O O. = -C -2 laN N 0 EA` Ca U a Cf V a) O_ N C a) ti CF. w -oo > LL a) 2 coj f0 U w N w O a) O 43 U do O a3 O O 0 iT) OcCD E N C O 4O U I— E o CD — a c 13 C a) W Fa vi U p U O 0 t N Q t y O .O d n as >. > ca CO O O O O W 7 F- w n n y o. a) y Ct 3 •3 0 3 a) r 22 "' as U) ti C ° > Ca p c c y c ai 0 COrn gm o 0C o E z L E 2 V Oo O > ° a_Q a 2 a o lilY Z rn F- W O O 0: a W w w to IU-I CI) C 1— .. LL m ....... D a- cc a ....... CW E o 0 0 `c. o Q —IU ^ = g > O O (co p,) LL Q (i) U Z a) v) o o s: E7 0 ILL' U - rnIT) O .- • We LL o G_ N U 0 0 a a W Z rn W w `1 O m 0. o J > LL Q m I 0 Do co v o !e ' o co 0) in rn co m N — ooi N. :.:N.....: LL 0) N 0 a) CDI— fl- :Q O Z 5 :::::-..co..., :0 co W Q 0> 1 ° 1— C C :IV" `i OU - rt' :::1: co Cen 7 Q E W U E as o W o U It co J .... ..... w Q W Q o 0 0 I- a_ m U 0 0 0 a) < W O N ch rn 0 0 0) Cr) a) 7A-4 I SOUTHLAKE CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT NEW REQUESTS SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 Low- DATE: 01/29/98 DEPARTMENT: 130-Public Safety DIVISION: 132-Police Services rewrea Wk4 OPERATIONS CAPITAL PRIORITY DESCRIPTION PERSONNEL AMOUNT AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT (ACCT. NO.) (ACCT. NO.) 1 8 acres land 132-979 Central Facility 1,740,000 1,740,000 2 3 acres land 132-979 Facility No. 2 978,750 978,750 3 3 acres land 132-979 Facility No. 3 978,750 978,750 4 School Resource Officers (2) 70,529 70,529 Police Vehicles 132-930 5 130,174 130,174 Portable Radios for 132-910 6 New SRO's 2,900 2,900 Pistols, & police 132-920 4iatei 7 batons for SRO's 1,558 1,558 8 Uniform Purchase 2,502 2,502 9 Uniform Allowance 1,170 1,170 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REQUESTED: 70,529 3,672 3,832,132 3,906,333 L 7A-5 Le N N O O O O O y _ I 1- N- N y < O O L ) - v O O co co ti f•- co co N F- to i. Z = 1- CO 0 W N (V �t - -0 2 3 a) a) W O ,_ c CC O Tz = .� 71 w — § _c ^as L^ ` H W , Ca CZ U — >, CO CO O Q) a) 1- U v v o� aa) U) it 2 c0 0 O H co o 0 • W w a CO CO c V W = Y 2 CO co c o cn 0 O L Z Y 3 0 °o cr, -' W c :c o w O c0 O O O W O J CD CD O O •O O �, Q W co_ co co z c - Le6, rc's)-O Q Z J 0 3 U C� Q a) : 0 :� E O W 1-1-1 -o a_ D co, "CZ - W � =U O Z WZ Q C\I W O U `- F- 2 >- cn a) 4- U cr) N O U Z 7 Z Z t Q o c a) 0) W 0 W O_ W Q W o a L 2 cc O >CC W — 0 : .�Q c U W a3 o v w 5 00 N E -' � -� c Q Z N QW rn in 0) a) 0 C (II J D 0 06 co , 0CI) c0 F=•- 0- Z Q> N N O c3 - cz Z Q a) Q 5 N Oc) a) a o O _Q O 1 O c w u) cc F2 U o Cn L- a- • 0 U p 0 U J U O 0.. 0 0 0 Z C _ U U 0 O Q F • Q. Q 111 a) CD W I- 0 0 a a) — W Q O o < -0 3 Q W U U O D o • c0 7 A-6 (1110.• 3 Q 0z O O O O O v .cr. 2 N N Q r C Cn) a) CO C C a) O U •N .-. .0 > a) C C •`� U �-+ _ Q. •O C- C6 C Z _ � V) 'e- . O O 0 a) D) -C1 a) = 4 °- C• E Q) Q CIOLL C O U O c Cn fz C > C O U 0' a) (�6 . V) C u) `, C .` C To D O O a) o a) _C -, C-0 O a) C2 C E C Q. O CO 'L (a O CB C") a) U cn .`• C = a) a) V) O a) a)> C-)7C •Cn '7 O a) C L asD U O Q O C H a. CO c 3. O. W C C _ U W L.' U W Y 0 w Q ~it O Lu cc c0 z W U = O _J C) Q o Z illz w Z CDo u in >- > O J Q � E& O f _J o J Q " .cn H co co < = a) O o Q W z n CZ = Q W as• , U o cc W 1 C p L a- 0 c, co Z W p V- o Zin co; O - u) m cz a) E o o ° � U C O 0 o cm 0• C Q) � Z. C6 4- 0) 03 v- O z -0 O Cn a) (...- C > W (B Z • U a) N < co CE C Ill <cc 2 -1 L ' 0Q W a6 X CB cm 7 a< 0 co W W ill 7A-7 .: __, ..:, H o O zL .. ti �� ti O °�° `° 2 rn on � Q N 0 O O .V Z E U a) O (� C N CO O C a. E O 15 U_ o E ` U N W H -O O o vi � C (CID) U C O - CD_ U N N 7 'a N p = "a f- _c ` C C i u H a. = co (ttist; c�i W = _ W W c Z d I H c- ^ Q = O D in cc W Z U) O D Q O Z ° ~ ti O (n 0 W J) W W U G) O LU u_ J > -' Q O < U co 0-) o W -J Q a) a � inC.) Q. L cu o = u) Z Uo WLU C p '" a O oN o co W O 1- L Z i o >, O M co N p O > U • a 0 -'-0 O C U O 6) ca _ 0 - O c L z 11.1 ca Z `) U C6 F N c4 �-' W Q U a C cc 2 0 CB p 0 r) W W F- O 7a-8 C (1110.1 0. F..._. C) .° Z in r` Lo co- O ti N. 2 C) c-) Q M O Z E a O O U c Z -U O Q _N O v 5 . F"- a. -= '0 U N O c, :O a' LL 4- L. C F- - 4O U • (n C U) O C D f� 0 O -) v-O +_ ++ - co C/) U — O 2 '4! N Q O N C O co O O O F- L �O Q. C . W cn F— a. O co (61 o W 1-1-1U i- v) W --I ~O W t CO N z W eC Oa' ii p r` Q 0) r hl— F- n O w N- o p Q p Zov in UU W cn Li! W CD aU � LLW > (9 J Q 4c12 c )- J O J Q F- F¢ rn w Q w C O _ to' W LL. 0 2 0 Z 2 cn Q o U W CO 0O U OL z a ix p o o) cn Ill Z oL `o >. 0 M cJ O CB Cn cn c) O EO O = 0 O cn O 0_ C O N rn 0 - o co z O E- O cn a) (wefS5 < V I— cn V(13 (a `� f.12 J a) C CC O H d U a- U CO X ca s Z p 0 CO W W F— U 7A-9 Q rg H L E. Z ~ ~ V iwe O Q co ^N W ) U_ t z > Qcoi0 • U a. a u. o 0 vi H 0 oc a) —) C ` C O O O:_. 4-- U_ S 2 E a 8 o c) c� aN o _ C ZI— co w 0 W CC w W J 0 W K2 0 Z w ( Q� � � a° O Z N ZV) 1- — Q ct O Q W W Z ix W Z p O 0 W O Z C9np 0 cm W' w } 5 0 --ILLJ V N � Q M Z ct Q 0 N ' O < Li rn W Q W QIL N Q w Z con = Cr) CC W W o a E Z Y _ w I co O (n U U L C O O ii O 3 O C cA a o 0 3 N 0 o M U Q" O C •Z O O W o '= `_' m U CD H acre E 0 Cl)oc� aa. Q o v(10.- w >' o 5 a- _ � o Z Ca) U)o N � cc .� a. .T a '`E. (+ N El Q W 3 O X a.) O - MI +r O 0 0 1- U � cn W - 2 i O 0 a- 7A-10 3 H Q Z Q 0LD N N 2 LO1 O L ^ L 0 V, fg Z 3 (D c 0 0 - o < = o ow C.) s 4- a) •N ET. to > I - O (0 o U � 2 c (Q c o - a) E al •V -0 E U a) L O 't o� CD u) 0 0_ o o -c H a) cB co a— cna O ai a ZH I-- (/) o7:3 O u(tj _ _ w � cn uj Q Y w O W fY , 2 cu Z w C I: w° O Z d N ZZ C!) r Q = O < w c w Z o J D Q 0 w C; I— 1— �• � >" > 0 o Q c� H 1 J o Z J Q O < 0 co O H W o w Q W 0- LT- o Q w z (CD 0 U o U w C W CC CY U WO E YZ a) Q a J N -0N O H D 0 (0 o O I o c cn a. (B O a U U _ 0 a) C/) o_F-w z U o 'a L z o F Z c (I) w Q J U C_ N a) Q I— w 0 x cu f0 pn Rf (o -. O 0 o I— w 1_-_. 2 < 2a0a. 7A-11 r 3 CO (p Z Ln Lc")Lc-)O L ,,, Q _-o a) as c cn Z U C O O aD U j I- O C Q C = o O O a) U) co > O Cn Q cn H co O a) U Cr 4- a) 0 I-- a) Q a) coa U o C D O Z H F- a) O_ W a) w w U) w Q O w f m o Z Cl- C ( 0 C - O Z cm (.:1 Z U) Q O Q W CC Z C u.a Z co O O W O Z o 0 C O• W } > 0 W Q M ZQ C] O (4 01 W Q W 0- LL c)U Q ow O. w Uw Ca fD CC O D O W w a O c YZ a) J cs3 U) 'CS H I) a) 3 0 D c) Ti c O O .n co L_ C U] z c �O a) O o 2 E c o '-> in '- 0 H ~ O co 0 N U) Q TA -cp C O W a) < O L.- z z C = a) O- N C T a) !. I- a o '0 o 0 0 1— c CC CC/) w �' 2 03 Q2oOn_ 7A-12 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT January 30, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 97-159 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-267 Rezoning and Revised Concept Plan - Georgetown Park, Phase IV STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner II, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property out of the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tract 2A2, being approximately 2.52 acres and a Revised Concept Plan for Georgetown Park, being approximately 5.17 acres out of the Thomas Easter Survey,Abstract No. 474, Tracts iiiiie, 2A2, 2A3C, and a portion of Tract 2A3A. A Revised Concept Plan for Georgetown Park will be considered with this request. LOCATION: 2600-block of East Southlake Boulevard, being approximately 600' east of Bluebonnet Drive on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard OWNER: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. & G.M. Nettleton 1 i APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation CURRENT ZONING: ``AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Eleven (11) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Emily Shanklin, 2627 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. • Liberty Bank (Gary Price) 2438 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. l'ill.' ! I City of Southlake, Texas P&Z ACTION: This item appeared on the December 4, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting agenda but was not heard due to Case Limitation Resolution No. 97-22. It was continued to the December 18, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. December 18, 1997; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated December 18, 1997, deleting Items #3a and #3b(bufferyard requirements)and requiring the applicant to place the plantings elsewhere on the site; deleting Items #4b, #4c, and #4e (driveway spacings and"stacking depths); deleting Item #5a (60' R.O.W. width), and modifying #5b (R.O.W. intersecting F.M. 1709 at 90°) to allow for a minimum of 85° reconfiguration. COUNCIL ACTION: January 6, 1998; Approved (7-0) First Reading subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 2, 1998, deleting bufferyard on south property line of Lot 1R2 adjacent to Phase III. January 20, 1998; Approved(7-0)to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the February 3, 1998, City Council meeting. c STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all requirements in Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1,dated December 12, 1997 and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 2, 1998 with the exception of those items in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 30. 1998. L^COMDEV WP-FILES'.MEMO\97CASES\97-159ZC.WPD (re I I II 1 ^-e2FG� 1 ... ...^.1 ,i -- ---4 4,-..r ..7.,: --iiiid _____;____._,- , .------iiiii, . , L , ,--,-„,...--,. ,,, , ,_........ .,0„ :,,____„,—_____,L.: .. i � , .--- 1 mai s 5 P _y r-` _r __ r sN.:U 1I + e _ C F AD _ r r.' y.y ' , i $tain -ra =I 5 I - - - _Y.:.1-•-- I i \/ .:•. :. 1 / \ 04, .. 1 ; ' ' ' '71r7.t-L_- '..____ to -. 1 pPA © i i N cr a-- 1. j _ i i Y� , , _,,,_,. , RJR \ p- __111°11 _� � _- ___ 1 E -_ -.ir; - _ E _ 1 t. J -- = i i `��'' _. _. .�_t a ' 'E / %- I "- r_.J ..T.--.-• i i I 1 I 1 1 1 ; � 1 . .. L Ij'.. - ' \ \ .. L ,A,. 1 1'r-t l ""=,_ 2--:--� ' i PP..: 3A r • et .R--- ./ '----- -- • _ g � row G ®G 4` TER]I B__ \ .. . .... . .. \ iv 1 i m jt \ \ 1,1 ._ _PAR051 K I L K :w - I -c - �R i — t., I m n , �� _�1- I_ _lam „ - T • 1 __,�,,`` N .; `,', Fe CONCEPT PLAN ONLY 5e• -ii 11: 1 x 1•159 =:I -' 9 _G .. , PARK : __-_ ` MAD `'` CONCEPT PLAN & REZONING I I I t ,, , /,______ _ .stater A-IO/J .„ TRACT MAP - E -®mot no =I Il � —. .1 P1 for I t" �' • A OPT ii 1--i..___ Lim e 1 m p II U®I / QO� N r7 Q ' aU N • M CO U ~N 6C5- Q U Q �`! < ' cc ct Lc) I C �C� CO Q cp Q ® < I Q1j g Crj CND N N Q .� a a a 0 0 U N "�alNam® (n� < z �� z -I-. Q F- uw Z C7 Z Wwm z eE Z o ki ZQ p Z7® Z U s, I a O Q z 0- (� �' �N J = o �' 1 Z o N � Q Z D l < 1Q w = VZ = w i I H Z Q Q =' < Z Q .--.I o - Q n � - O wZ >- CD � o z - I mN '- • m , oU Z 5 = 6 Q ® iii cn 11- U 40 SdNIEid = — w = 0113OIINOW ILJ ® NMOl3J>`IOdY" U xi I- 1 „� , a N C7 w I . 0 0 1 _a -� Q ¢ dcc I Q 0 L • .1 EE _ = (/) (...., / 1 • *er u, < O -3 , yr i N < H cD n 73 . c.) '7--k --. % U Q U cc 1\ - �wi NO T 03 ^ N < N < - • .. dl •tt v y.V '+. ,*.• it t' n ., r► iii. -1RIw-)PT,0 w `• i • ifl't; �� ii i1 it i .piin . �� ,alb; ;;5,, :�;; �� { I i 11/1 .©F a _ • L :... , . .•,...; ini., , ; ilkii .1 II raj 344 /I, '' bid z Z'"t1...1.!1 'jr 1;i ! t 1 _1Jl .1,,�s1 hill_� S a <" lut .. !t! i,; 1 jlj'`'" i'1 ) 3 1!1 I !F•,�'! '. t- U y ---is l' nisi i : i 1-• 14. , i !?,jt' •! 1 t I e . ' io< ¶ . s;•T y , Ili 1 1 • 1 1 1' t 1 till u iiiC� o< = r j,1 j.1'1 i .i ! 1' !It Eli„ 1 1'1 o t' r x r 71 •t� . �, f j•r1�' ,1 t�al y it T t�J t 11! J o f F y.1.; �nr I 71 71j , l j^ •ItIII.:• 1 • !li .1i it 1- 1;IJ! i -. iottl , Z •.F•„ o>pig^�� • !„ , a 11 +_• lt1 + ffi Tl : + -�jj� 1 i .� ,sy �31_t ; i � F'�j 2 I! t! !, , ),1 i� : i 3 y v;- .1411 j i' a a .a 0 m �: �194 ;e!�1 t!.'1;VI' R-•i ioa°!- —liar le, \,,'v ',lit j 3t C7 <a �1 ii1•jti : ,i 31 11$- 3�; + ! 3111y•� '1 b?1=i j� t�l{3G W m O 1. .I t e:' i'd-.1 .'11�l1 t•i:e•j2 .1 • $.salt i11�41 t,111 �---j •s, 1,,f,1 1 i :1)17- 1,i1-- 9°° qe1 3 fs w j 1 j 111i vj$i '!j g:11 :� r o` t1!1�1 rilfl r�;E Yj!.�si Ys i{I�lE ti!1711 D4jzrj !n ca itTi�? it l 3 l - r_ �qq I. u .I j • I y +12. _� �' i j 1 r gl1,11 (rr1rt70: I } ill glIti i M1,111iiii 'il c1 1 i {-s }t ,I•..- ! lij . za ■ .-1 • R ,... Ijzt i • 14 $'j 1�Itl; l;�'j, 11 r1l g 1 i,le� gil' et ll i ..„ . . \.I 3 1 11. I1IW;L I17,4.ii'1NIJIZ fill I. �� o 9 s. _ tht!r ,y 3LI Y ij 1il3'1ilt 1 >$= Y a `- r L i wj.i,;j'.2411•1,i 1C lijl I e 0_ !! C . 8 1.ii illf ii 11_..ii a.i y — Q d1i � �— I c / 1 /JJ i�r� ��' `lQ �; i 'I Q L. ! , o, -; 8� -a� to laz /�ti o .'t ' r` ,• s Y�il7' i,.ZT.rW ir.n.>< • 'i � ��! k O o_r(„i. •.OL.00.00—t�1�• a = : I 1 I `i 0) t'2 4. if .;;': :/- ill-si, • T _ ill l.' _i S. ; '1 '= a ~O�i ( Cs J z ` I`C �...y,t;:..d .' 4 .. is is ?_ r Jt:' ///l _p " Li13�: ` "`E + j^ i� �►s y i 3.OL.00.00 N _= ,-_—. .0[2t6 TO/ r— / tt. -oi t_ ':1 Z T ' ' _]} j- =i till' m t 9 1IP, {'cYs .1 ._12 1tn s1 1� , 1.' < .1 1i -x. 1� , - i titii Ala ! oa 8 ac 8 :Ia _ iYiiZ i3 eE 3_ tlth 1 0.r Y r • ;841i1 sY dz 1ii 11111 F r='' 5 F :P.r 113' ,F.^i •!• I eL • _'. ; vi__,...... _ ....._,• m • J •JNI'SJ.Lb1'OSJl/NNJ SVYLL 3 IVI 1 lOS 4 ! 1 i IZ ?I21dd ,IMO.L 3O'I03 J IL. . . Ili� i III i ; L ... 1 6. , : . , . . , , ; : . , ; . „, 1 ,,,. ,_ .. 1 1; ., ,4 , ... d , 1 i _ , , ; , ; 2 . . - t 1 a 1 ' r"_'x J i (�J 1 ' ' 3I 7 p i Real 2 ' ,_ _ 0^,4 'it Q• R • 33 y g :�; ,a. a o.2, ;,e1sl \ F tt ar 1a53 ! rflI � + ei g `/P} !A�pit'itx',tSi5'e.3:'s5;;;.ailrl� e} iy "' _ 1 ` ¢ J So3 ' 1 . aI �yyyY'Sa, �rry(I ICI lvi ' �,. ,� o , rq, s i 1 tillilfi ?12 '. . , T `.. w I§i13 iii I i 4': ' -�.-3 , _"- c1Q3 ITtr a SS !; ,, 'I. :v.. ,2 IsiRl ,'6 �'i 1 1 m ` aft� , A_`?�0:17 -.` rI 1. # :; i i ' ¢ , - 'r ; 1I � 1 i1 { IIW' hl *j ? 5it < °I h. 1�iFI % S I 31 -� -acI` '': mo :14_ ;11 I t1 , J 33 e ill I „I , I , .`I v '.. C 1 t ,� i 11 - W 1 :, Le , Its . i 1. , , ,• � ,. , 1 ; i „ ,- ) O �I ? I 2 13 F S: 1 'a •• I• t R s ' -' ,„1 '. `L' IN .1 , :I tlt!,i 11' `t'` i 7 ..3.• 1 '= Y >rCC ;54 At at 3!' ' .1 I }`` n' y', D7.0.: d:I 1 s1 . . t :I. !, 1 t ; tr 2Y 3 1i •y t • ti i _ 1: /'� z " �;+ ' ! `'t � ! 1', 'I i•• '• it a j ,y ! 1 1 °� : , L.L. — J C I — I — ' I ' J t, , I i n ? _ >, 1 5 i ,.. , . 1 i.'1 1 1 1 f ' Y _5 I . I v J • , ) :1 I 1`t t 11 \�—�� I ') I J W < i • 'i 3 i 1.1 1 1 1 1 tic !_ I.I .� .i "Y' I , >...c.'.>w..,....,a 1 CC - r ^ i i _ , •_1 J t I t� -- � t t i1.1t; ItIt` p. Ott' 1, 1._t__ fi t . d,KtAl 1.6 %: /iz 1 ' 3' f4•:A Pit fr'tai 1;� l'i tia f;7 f� 2 ,w.t:,-�.u, 2 Y i" �i I _ i ie? t=t at3d• � ��[ i1! S{j4 t �P' i e .o cI ' I Y s 2. it ii..t+� tS!t 2�tt�x ,5 it ,� in £ei a !*" ; x 1 S� 13 fi3 y . ja_ax i1'j_tr i_ - ' di 'ONI'S-1,1.V1--.X.)SSV NNI9 1 SVX.31. '11ViH.L.10S '>afVd NIA10I 30110]0 , , : : • 1 . It i: • I -.44. 1 „ ..i 13 ,i,•,3 ,_ .,c.... . - : —-- --- --- , ''..- x -• , L. : ..6 , : I • , I . I I II „ . . •• .... . g , : , , . -.• , , - , _ -1 , c---=._____ 7':,--,.. - • . , .,•• . , [..,---7 I.:''•.'.'' 4, '31 2 2 : al zZ2 i ,4: 1 1.:':4.:-4!.: •.11;;.;:°;711 :;Zlis."I L. ''1-!----1-Pti 1 -----, - _ - 1471I.-1 .--- - . "t'''.•.cz-,- C'' ! '' fi'§•-6igi ' . '1 '•:SI !Olii, :71';'4, !•!:,;41V1i1 . - .. )—LD .. . ., 4 xliiit1i:11 1 .-:-. 1 - : - :3. 114)..-----VA... -i9 , • , ! -,-- ------___ •-. ctiji,---=7•.x.... • •i i, - _ i, ; I 17;11.11i! ..li•.-.1 1 !:.';'----::.''."'i•:.., ... c's--'''-'-i,i.-.-4 s'; ;:••'i'e , i • : 0 I : - • '----1' 135,: , I '..!---...•.' 1 . •:- ' ! 1 : '1!:•Iii.141,t,! IFI -------t 'k.---..„-j- -"--:-' ' ‘- .- . •.,-.! a.-_,;:.,•. : . 1 • A . - . > __ . ...!..1. -_ . 1 I l'; i . .il-''i '•-•!?,i1liaill11 L , X'I3 3 114,-!4''al ..4 .--.4,',4-. 47..'-.-:',i'i ---1-7-‘.:•---, - - - - •• I 4,1 . . 31 1, 3 1 ,a., ,. , . ,. ir ...„.... •. i: .,.. : , ...„, „:„...2. , , . _ ... I IA i CI ' 14. 1614 !414! 1 1;:411 ! ,D,A NI., 1, -.1— ! 4"-X -_. ',,,-,-- "-- " t, I ' •,----. ;., • - _ ...] 1 - ,- .11 < I I ;.!,',11''' . n'34 %'t §, ••: ---..!:'-: =,11, "`' - ..,., (,. .'!tt,,,;•.:11 ---- . - ,.. , '112' 'it I 1 11r4 f- g, 1 ' Illilii ! i t': is • ;' . ,,.• :,,_ ...., . ; "...,. +_1 1 1 !,1 ., : .,i, ..1.. 1 t, '117-. -1- i ;*-..!, gi '0•2 ul '', lk,'3, , ;Olt II ,,.••:,31.11;:mi liI3:4 1 'i 1,' i 1; '-i • •• i '1 , -4 -4'10! 1-1" .%Hilal 1.ii I VA !;•• 5 il4i- i '" j rF „ 1 , ' UJ , va 1...!..:3:.=1,..313i7,3:.,al -.-7" ! . ; .".; i, 4,1,77,• 4 • • -.1. , • , ' . 1 ... •% . .01; • 1,4. .., , , i .,," . I.— r 15 r.: it': ",.. • I; o , , . t• : „„ ,. , , • • • l' - • tti ' U) I It I ! - . - , 1 i-ri 1, . ...1, .,. ,• g - ' 4 11:LA- ......... I . • t : 4, ! I: ' : ,t, : • -: 6 ' I ' , t 6, 41., ''.i ! ' D 3: i: ; ! !;• , ; ! ' ; ! ;171 !1 .4...6....ac...••••cc,: ., 4 . 1,.. Er, 1E4'1 .0 11 - I • - ,, ,.,,, : 1 J;•,., , . , . , 1 -••• , • • , 1 : • 1 , ,--;--, ; , . •r,. : 4' ;.! •j• ; i• 11, . !-\...,11i.___ — ! r.;•. .,: i ; , , i , I 1 I l• l'i ! , i 1 i . I , ! ili.,,,,, ...! 1.;.! 1 I !!.. ;1 •11' ! , . ' 1. ;4 7, ''4'1. L : i . :1 1_,_.1 , , . 1 4. 1 7 4 7711 .. 7"4. i I 1 ! , ! 7•74.!.. . t t, !.., 4 , , 1 4 .. 1 ''"?,.1.:. :". . • ;•.2 ! I 74;2 A . CC ' •(! A !. 7A., ,,,. 1 .. . .,-, , 1-• ,..,'," ‘t , , , .., :.,._. 5,:. ,.,. 0 i 4 9. • • I ,_• 41 E- - t . ,: " , ' . • 1§ 4, , : .1i. I. .' . I ; ..I 3 i' : ?. ! .3 •„Z;`g : - ; !it',' CL I I CI . ':i 3 1.7.3 i s I' ' SI ••1%.-, ; •1.=•• Il '3'ili, •.- 3 • ''''. 3 .:: --k= •• •3., 1, 's,...-,::. arl, 'I:'•-, • ,I ..“.:•211 ...Y0. ,Z4 , •'7 I ! 0 1 0' 1..!' 1, ; .. i • • ,,, 1 5. , , , , , ,,i , yl, . , , ; 'II ,...,-- ,,, ... , ; :, .• .: , , < . i , i ) , UV • . „ I : '''."--- , '``? ••:. -LF;:. ;_, . . i: i ',-,:'', , ›- . I ...1 F.. ' •, , t ,. . • t. , ,. Ci) . . • ii ," 7' .! ,,',i, 1‘ 1 1'94 4 1; ?• '''' ,.;":. , I 5 I I i.1 !!. t ! ' i , 2 . t.. . Z.", I ::. • . . . , , I ; ! ;:, -. • , , 31 it' ?. , . 1 . . . , . . , ..• . ! 1 1 1 4, ' Ot f 3 4' , ! 0 t 1 . •••••, I 1 , , L„i-!.! 2.'J• • ' •;• -,•," ' 1 - ;147!a• , 4 A / ' ' i : ; ! ; 'i f .,1 ! 1 i ,....;7,.-dA I • , ''. LLI ', .. '•1 3 , f • ,,,1••-.!•1• 1 ', 1 ,7--.--j' , ! ' "2-, V 1 1?; ! iLl" ':'; ' '!. . 1 i ;:); ' : 11 a: -, • ,; , . , , • 1 , i , 1 ! , 1 . 7 1 ,,,, LA , Si 3 : i • . 1.111 . 1.01, , ;I., . I ! I ,----, •,,,,,, MI '',; i •,- ' 1 tti 1 i t Ft ri 11',1:•1 i 113,313 : ; r : 1, • _ ' . -.R.1 :, 3 ,..,;a • — , : 1 , t 1 2:i . „ 11. , ,r` ,, ',:-...-3- - '. . ....,.. . 1 , .., • ' 1: • . , . E' 13, •I,. -• "C ' , 33,.; 7. . ..‘ ... ,• ,, . ' I'. •1!, i?.11 .1:! re.:.:In. q 1;i ''' ' .4 74• I 0 I Pi , • ,',..L..:(4, I, : 11;:f 'il 1'!II Ifi i It.' '4' ..e., 3 tk, Tz3*,' :I:, ::.e. 4'.1 11 , .I i .. .„ .4.! 4 71' 17,, , 1,2,1 nil; ' :;111!) ;9. 1,!3:1.: 77: riii 'It i.;;12 ;•1 ' , 1 4! ,.. .., I '.! ..--' •-_-_-: 1 111, 262.2.1„12 .1/ 3,4- :41 ,i7• ,1 , ; ,7! - ;;'1 ?'.., -,'!.! r*. kx : 1 • n4 ?• I . '''''''''-'-.- I - . ia- ; - - 7 -1 4•.-',i,., ':: i•a:: + !, :•.! 1...,..1 ;_k ;4; ! ! Z , „.., %it:4; h;• ;" :'941 te 3.33 1:3 :7,3 t. r i . , c..,.. .I: ,3 41jir.• •-, ;II 3•23 4p; 41, 1. .,.I.,», • '4.., , 1 1 , ! ';, 4 II; 7;17 atii:il 40 4 'VI Z'.; "! 1 L. , I.. , .,(, it+3•1 ';0 l'*• 3 ii! li'l2 rl ;s: ; _,; 01,,i, re? ..?!;,':' ••• •-z1 • ' •3z al I I: '• 1. 1: 11. 1 .-.:1-: ;"'.1.?;) 31:di /Intl! 141 113 /•.4=1,• /33 Iii i , il *--:-_•.' ,..3. I . • ''.. = .i ,,•• 2,;', 3.• -1 ' . '3ii •3 , !.. ,..= , - • , ial. l.=, .3. i',21 ;. li': !`$.-,!'1 .4.rt•-, 3, II':I '':"3.11•1 ri;;:i,P, -= I-- - ----- — 9 --ri Jj 3ig['S31.b1JOSSy)I J SY!13.L '11YlHlilOS 1' > n gsV a ;tea NIM0139xo39 , ' . ,s �',1''1st. i c, t t � ' •v IF- wM �� ! f; I 1 Cr) Mii 1 3I yt� q' : ! {!• 71 ',;; Ag; , .111v 4 )Snh � 1'}3' 1 I j }•Q-n : Y 1 R'. - - - r — -ram ^,n. — e _ z • I c G 11t il— i+9 i is j. Ii! 1 i, 1 i{I e�S' ,enL'.7.7.7...-i_-7.- f 1 , i 11 !i 1 ;4 Q {ten• ,a i' J ; LIJ 1-',--, r 1 ,,••••••( I I I i , ; t• rf ' CC LIigneleiturt • r,.. it ; I p` a ,1 i77 M . , '/to , '1l� )4:Tl I`. yi j� r1 i ' • '..G� 1+so '. W Er.: ;. its t r 3• .� _ 7 I,1 ,1c;f , .I- S 1i1� ,�is ....I:: i;f. I �1t t ij - 71i ; j _ �ii 1 jl INN. ' ll • I • j7 i 7 i . i! T . I ; • iliji W. , , CC ! 111 r l l a it l ° ip t3 Z. 11 '1 - it 7t c;nl ^ 4/.. In?{ 11r1 r( qi i1; 3! ;t ifi j s.; i3{ ,i! ls!it tii-ol ii i ii Pi; ;'^1;1 9 d2 li sis i : i' i;` ' I L._ -i tt: . Sia. {: l:eT11 ttl 1►S t I.t „r - - - • R•— - - - pp v. 54 71i 1 1,1. 'i1: a 1, 1?! l.a !'1 i 1 I �. - , n • If r ''',i-i(: j �Si• qi!1 I S141 i ;' ,it o c+ tsj S , F, li �; ; a l !e ' `'j' stji•i - 0 s. {tS 4>{ 1 `S'' 1_1 1;t s yx t . i 1 ,li 7Ti 1I ' ... , ... .... li 1 1 L !! i e 2 9 2 ... -. if'244 -.. _ ..V. -__ .21 ;1 _ .... 1111! \ ..- ... N.• o. \. i •.. .. .... , .... - — _ • 11 tirott•...--.4a. "' .., , .... )64D-.--- --'- g4ii.-=-.Z* C3.4 .“! .,; o ii. .:•..., , •,.. . ii 4_1.1. ... ---'---.. i::::ji'•.; 77 .4.!"......''•• ••••.7.1.4..,,,r ' •''. ..,_ Ill -•••,...' 2 ...... ..•.• . • . .• .. „..... .. =1 I - -i- - ''':9:::••• s'',''• : :.:":i;:::,..!iq,:!•;;;.•,:••.:1 , . ..1-1. -. ---1 2 -••:!"-,..": :•".• :::'•::zi..:;:iir.:,,,7,•••4 •,..... 1 1-4., --. ,Cg 1 •... '-: 7'....;"•:::. ::":-.2',i'..: ::::i;;;i:::; ',1--s.,.... ........ . w (. ci:: - ,• ..,.,. •:i,L,!...::77,:,..4.;2.,::: -....., ---........._ -r-Th. _7-_--\ '.•;I:,-,:::: ..,. .i..,,. :z.:7:.7.,:,-,:i,:i!,:1--.. --...„, c . :: --.1 • i- - , i i 3 E.!. .,:::.,:i::::i:: :::ii •,-,1 .---........ --_. i ii:i . >- I 1 - I ..c.i: II,.,:-.. iii';',iii 1 11a31 01 .11.i',..-:::::iiziii:::::i 4 _ i::.:1 114i:::::. i :ij i,; iill! [1 '.1iz. iiI ..pi:.::::::::i:::::::::.,.. A '. :,,,/ • i , C.f) !i'.!: 0.:-::::::::::::::::::: •: 1 ,:ii:i.:ii::ii:: ::•;i:::, 1 I lliii ;:i':ii'iliiz,: i . / /:• ! ' 0 VI. ;=••.:::•:::..,::.:;:.„ .,. c n. T rVi::::.::::i;:::••:t•• :,! . , 1?..'',7.,.- :. ! l• a. ..: .::i::::i ..,; . • : -:-.:::::......r.-.-.1 ---- — , ;.::::::: ,:z....,.:::.-:...:.;..... = ...;'..:*::::•• •. -:::•;::::: -.:.::ii:: :•,;.,:J F.'' .:i::::;'..., -iiiii::::::k N lo ____ ir.-:•:.' , i , c_ il i,••- :•, ,,i.::::::: t L I.,.., is. r-, .:, i.:?. ,. .ii ,:ii,::„•:::: ! ..,t:. i:i...,...: .1 : 1..,,,:„,:.„ii:ii,::i,: ,.i,i 11,1:•:•:':':::, :ziii:: :: 1 i li i Z 0 k.:'-'', --• .1 ! la 3 — i:14 :-:.ri.;iii§i.ii 0-.•.t.,...i, ••.! i' :4- ' t___ : ;1,, • : .! ! e ,'; i 1-;.. - • -- rli - 1::::::•::::•:::,::-. ..., .... ,•.:••••:•••::-::,::: !•:., 4::.:-.:,:::•:::•:::-:: .t.,•••...::::::'.:-:::.:::•::I:— ..1,• ::::,:iizi.:".5i:.'iii c , r?'::: •i 1 Lq....,11 !' ., cq:,::::::•::: :::.::. :„. ti: .2:::::i:::: .::- 1:1 , 2.'7•:-S:j7Ci i ' '-• 0 4..`, •--, I 1 1. ' ! '',j,-.'.‘:•,: : I I - . •,:".•',....::.;•.: ".! i•f • . '! V:1'*:•: ' g , z • -,-',...:::,.i,.:,. .:,.:,,,ii ",,'"A',..‘,'‘ • .— !'i': . ' .. -:.,.'2,,': I P •,.:-‘.:.'l Ar i ."...--••• ••••••—........." -+, ! 1 I I! !It, -1-1 .7. 7--11- i {- . n • ii ir_ _ _ _ _ , , 1 9 1 i ..„.„.„ ,... ,/,,,,,, i ,- • 0,1=',/ , LL1 r-r- f.; ci i iiii 1, i ,,•••,.. i ,:-.7;.4 • ' D ., -r....,, ii 1' M iliiil i I 1 U • Ai I 1 1 \ • . ,,._ )( _L '. i LL 0 la l ,--•. i . • ,,, ... 1 , 1 : t 1: 1 1 L • {-- ‘•,. i , ci) 0 I , • ;,„dt _._ o ;, ,',.•. i , 3. = 11 i „_-••:•.-.'',•-:-'•:.:', /,„,. v % • ; 11 I Elt,.':' .i',.'''\''..-,"z•- • -.- ! ' .. -!-ril . .,.._,: .•. til! f.' 11 • i . L. 1 i 4 ‘ i ,.....,..."•,...,...1 ow : - i , L.._ • '"1---11 ---- 1 ' . - 1 4g 1 c i: 1 : iz llt 1 v iv OP it r16 -q it' )1-.4 'WM! , jJ,, JNI•si.Iv1-)ossv >l (,,) SVX11. ':]YV11W1OS it r� �:�.,�.` ,�. . " r.._ III ISVHd X21Vd PIMOUJ2IOIJ 1 j 5 `� ; < 04= 1, 2.1 ; t 1 „ I i� _ LaO)y. L .. r„ , : ,,,,. .,„.: „,„ ., Is 1 , .— •.,.,.; .1 1 - KI O • , il 1)-' 6wF, ',L I i - - ": 2 ate c ; 2y' t , o i j4 ?r ya: { r ,r'Lt 6i. 1 N _ ,+: �p' f i 1 0 - 1 r< rq N. CI) 1 a I 1. . 1c. p,; W 999�.1; ;1',a13 11�i,� 1 i°'i_� I ii.!; •r ;. - ((l'�1 #. j'� ;r° j 0 p !q /�. li CL ��. I/,,.0 1., t I( u, 1.r1 t 1.b 1:i 1 i -' ' I Z pqr 1 i ,., i g r n 1!ii t „ 111 1 al =y r�(7,@ i ( 1 i ppe�9 iq• tf t ' f I;I _—f °. 1!9 .i il� , 3# r I! ll A S i f r 1nm fy� ' wum , 1 i 1'' i. ,, r l - la i i .�, eut uuu t L _ � . , � y Fr A 1.!; i i -_ ! ;:-,.--..(1 ---i .• _.1 g; 3.‘ i.i __.‘ -:!,, , , „ ,. cm r..; „,(. .!: i ,. , . cc l E�1 ' !i. i S i , , l L „.g ' , 1 iii �r 1 Ifs9 i' !a t, i . � i r; . , Il..,z3 t_ • 3 + i — i q i ail v 1 . 1! e7 S: , i ' 1.iie.vF, I u� _ I 0 1 l rF r7 / 1 /I•.._. L r1.� , eI !l 9 R ,,^ I , �, G! ! i I c t i ' S r i ,i, 1 8i [1, i� Z� j. vi It ', 4 4 \,, = m ,m• r l_(`1 l i• 111�7 .. V. i •=J i !a' ] ' 1 1 !; 413f ad• ' " i i , e ° 1 : `. 1 1 J A a i 6 1 r ^^ • e x11f ji S E 1t i1' �� i -� r.11� \ :. ' ' t, I..L {q { •1 6 i Ili 1 il I j1 Ir. S 911f •;4' ie I 1:r ,t1 I i I. �1 r - _ t III t �- !!i1.1.2,_ I....{ W C a:.1 Ott', t9 ! i •'1 ter j, i f �'.- r i� --. I I !; ;.i : I I� r t q p iS: : l T �i: I F, ; E �;1t dl�1j {e lE l !S� !;; 1 1 W i _•; I • ! .1� . ills a'11 P A.A S t �;l 9i ! rQ� i1. . 2�� 1 Il+ 0 Iz 'f 'i '. ;i1 r,1,` 1� ; t1 Its !, ' 1 . �' � f 1° 1 id -i‘1; aft 3 ,1 1' iCD P aS; t t Se xi " .1• , �. _ 11 il20 II' I �` Cr) 1aN, S ! �t; i1 , et t.Y t; t! $ Ir i li ! t I S 'zf ;s��; '1i •.E z ' tpca . ri n !hi 'E$� •; r 1 tf ail 'p� : ti* i !`dd I) + -'i ti, 1 j t; it; 0- I.- - - - .-f.� _.___.-. ___ �_=.. .. i1� 1 I Z, I a rt CC 1Si S 1 ., x!e e1 x`. .+ i1 �. i --" I : ION al; lilsl t ! 1fx lt: tat Pi 1 ,� { p it yi (..... p 4 31 3 ft. r ; -: aft.1! 4` ; ra } r :� t ri 1 9 s!: u! !t!"` 11Se (ii1t + t° �: t tot !+l ! 91 3y , . . 1: ,it .11 4S 3 S i !f +� ¢i #P' 4 lit!. , o ��`s( :tat .t t ! R;; s¢ ti: = Y'f ti=;.°y f , ., y x 1 fi' s. sf' S i 1 �, t t�vr ' i 7 I trlj l 1x.ttS� ike 1ni f3i 1 +x i 1r i (� Ii!�5c.��id:�i: wi x1 !1e 1 )y!• . rl � + + Q� .� ;1t91 WI 11 iIS1� HI 1;? I!it1t 5 YY r xka '�r ';,),Y�s I.I I..1-,-,. ..o I ... .I.:1 i.. 1 .!' '•.: .;.:3-- .--; 11.,"3-1.,,, l'.4.:',:,?,,,; . 7: -7' " 3, .,.•. :;"7 2. 1-1--=';', '-'..^ - .?•7. ,i'''":,'1-, z 7 ,.....:1:0-•27-', .,-.:.1 21 '' - _ ,1.", - _"...;•;:',,,1 :••••;.1 ,t -1 CD ..' ••:,' 7, i :••••! ., , 2:7 :.72z' i' !::- 271'1 L' = 1•2.:. •, •i7-1;:';' :2:•'- M . ,,; .. 112-::: ' 7.,'“V-“:0? ]i,.,, .1?-' L''' 'f', :1,,i ^ 2.;'H- ":•'.' C r) % . :!; ''•i n:',-;:1;1 :•.' '''' ; '-: , .,. '...','' 7,'7,•!,...'2-2 ." ; , :.;4'.: •.'I " .,...- •" ::'::.,; 1.''''7 L .' „,t ... , --:,- " 7-• " ' •'. 7., -:",*, ', ..:•.:,l'j - --i •'', -',,..i..1":2" • . r^".. :".. i.: 1".•4' -S-S-^2 ', .1 - . , •,! -1 ', • •--..' .3,u..r.?'"-..,.. ',J.' 1 -5 ' ; ; • ' -•-,i'",t "....; L. 1, ',.,,,,‘". , , : 5. '.• U:Wil'''3'i ..-: "' ' ":. i%.i :_, ""3'. .7:1:- ...-') '..1 .1,1,...i, ..,•....i'2,-i.,,-_:'" _':, ,..7, .:,....- 1..E4 ,-.3 .A.,• - ',,'-i -- 4i,2' -, • ' ,- :-_ ,4!•,j,..''....3•'• '''"''' ,v!"2' 7 '2,, ,.. ...:- . ::"'H;,,,:t , ,.-:1 _. . .;,,...,1,L.1,.... :•:- ..4 ' i 2 ;!,.:7-.: 7, .".4u :.:' ..--:,- ;11,',"12,-Itil i2,... :III •, f; 1:3,: '‘I.' 3,'4'-•''''. ?:.-],3:'2 , , .iic•-•,-s.i.:1,•1 :: 7„ 8,:'`• $7.1 •,11 :3,Jz: °,-?, '.':?,:2,?,- ''' °Z.! ' '' ; _ 1r42,,,13:',..4 ." -'-• .."`. •,,:-, :...= ..-', %:, .1'-'-,2-3 .rh4,741: :,....,,•1 ',..-,:s.J2?-.1. ;'-,?, H'. °!,' ----; '7',:: •,3 •^:%"'-.,2. '.%,3,:, .,,,Ii.„1,-2*„ ,'4". .'. ''';'' ': 'e '-•'-' : 4.„,. ...fi'.24' 5: r".61-3".*' .:--'1- 1.':-..:1 ;1E.! 1-. • 4-", '':•. '.• '. ?,-„.";4 •••:•,:“ •,..:4 ,i.-.a“-.3.2,1 .-._.:-it j,li ,-,.. ::: .1'.-!'fl ..., ,:,?,''.:: :.,-;:-,L.'3 '--• ;-r.;:, -:.- :r L:4'r: Lr ,e; :, .2.i,f ., /. ,r: . 2.:;,: . .,;;.: ... 'il'in.=0..,— ........,. ....,.. .... . - . 2 0 .;,, -.,:.• LI . , z7.1..137.., '348: ,,;":127; . ' i ' 4'•. ;12 0 .!:,x ,' 0 i / ' .1° ,....; .3,.. . A2',V , ' 71 0' - .. / i ' CC-V .• / . : 1 ' , • ...., Z--- , H --I •/ ' . ....i :1 ' t, .-.: 1 ..• I . , 1 I t CL , • i// ii=1,1 ; 1 1 , . (11111r , ' I / • L. ,. CC. , ,, , ,, ... ...... ; , ..... . .• .. ,, in Z " . . ; ; ;: ; ,., ,.! , . • , A! , , ,:-:: . ! -.. ,;.,,. -.! ;-• 12 ; ::'...! ': 1 • f " ' ",,' 'i !: i •-!,! •'.. '...- -I , , 1 :, 1 ,_ ! 1. 21 -,, , - '•/ i _ L1.1 I... ,-.. /.. I- CLCC t li 21. -------- : , • 1 , • 1 21 : • 1'''' • ! ' • : -.• ' .il : ii.,1 .: . . 4:1 '/' / " ' , : ' ' .1 i•ii.."I ' :11“ ,. " 4 , - 0 , , . - .I •! ( ,1 c zl i '1.• .;.! LL1 . . , .t . ..— • ' ' ,. . 0 • , .1 ; !I > , L1.1 , i d CC , 1 1 -I • ! • --:,..f-: , , q ,,,-;••-•o,,------- , . ' I =-----9, 1 4 W il ! 1 !..0111kIPPrjssa ..1.....1 41116, ---mn, , ..- 3E111 MR% 1 lii 113V-411111 i,1 ..t II V • • 1 , , L. •,..•,.•,,,, ,•% ._ i.:'„.,:.,.;..rr , .- • i / 1_,•- i 1 i. I- • City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 97-159 Review No: Three Date of Review: 1/30/98 Project Name:Concept Plan for"C-2" Zoning -Georgetown Park.Phase IV. being Lots 1 R1. 1R2. 1 R3, 2. 3.4. Block 1. of Georgetown Park Addition, being 9.15 acres out of the T. Easter Surveys. Abstract No 474 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Realty Capital Corp CNK Associates 920 S. Main St. # 170 2045 N. Highway 360. Suite 160 Southlake. Texas 76051 Grand Prairie Texas 75050 Phone: (817) 488-4200 Phone: (817) 640-0100 Fax: (817) 488 - 5257 Fax: (817) 633-3309 Attn: Khiet Nguyen CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1/20/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Bufferyards are required along all internal lot lines according to requirements of Ordinance 480 Section 42. Where "C-2" Zoning is adjacent to "C-2" Zoning a 5' Type 'A' bufferyard is required along each side of the property line. Lot 1R2 does not show the required 5' Type 'A' Bufferyards along the north and south property lines. (P&Z Recommendations 12/18/97: delete,placing required plants elsewhere on the site. C.C. Actions 1/6/98: deleting bufferyard along the south line of Lot 1R2 adjacent to Phase III) 2. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways accessing public rights-of-way: a. The existing driveway intersecting F.M. 1709 from proposed Lot 4 does not meet the required 500' spacing from the intersection of the proposed R.O.W.. The provided spacing is approximately 300'. b. The proposed northerly driveway intersecting the west line of the proposed R.O.W. does not meet the required 100' spacing from the intersection of F.M. 1709. The provided spacing is approximately 45'.This driveway has been indicated as a"right-in only"driveway. The width shown for this driveway would not appear prevent egress traffic. c. The proposed driveways do not meet the minimum 100'stacking depth.The provided stacking depth is approximately 50'. 3. Clearly indicate all required fire lanes. Off-street loading spaces cannot encroach into any required fire lanes. , '¢�— l2 City of Southlake,Texas 1 P&Z ACTION: This item appeared on the December 4, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting agenda but was not heard due to Case Limitation Resolution No. 97-22. It was continued to the December 18, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. December 18, 1997;Approved(6-0)subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated December 18, 1997, deleting Items #3a and#3b (bufferyard requirements) and requiring the applicant to place the plantings elsewhere on the site; deleting Items#4b, #4c, and#4e (driveway spacings and stacking depths); deleting Item #5a(60'R.O.W. width), and modifying#5b (R.O.W. intersecting F.M. 1709 at 90°) to allow for a minimum of 85° reconfiguration. COUNCIL ACTION: January 6, 1998;Approved(7-0)First Reading subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 2, 1998, deleting bufferyard on south property line of Lot 1R2 adjacent to Phase III. January 20, 1998; Approved(7-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the February 3, 1998, City Council meeting. * The applicant should be aware that a study regarding collector streets for this area is currently being conducted. This may impact future development of this site and should be considered prior to any subsequent site plans or platting of this property. Changes to street locations may affect placement of proposed driveways. If such changes occur, driveway locations should be reconsidered with any subsequent plans. * Although not required by ordinance,staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA97-159" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * It appears that this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of the site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. • Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on the north, east, south, and west building facades)per §43.9c 1 c, Ordinance 480, as amended. 7Cs — ram City of Southlake,Texas • Masonry requirements per§43.9C l a,Ordinance 480,as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and§43.9c3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43- C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13,Ordinance 480,as amended;and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Residential adjacency standards per§43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended. • • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Realty Capital Corp CNK Associates COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\97\97159CP3.WPD 713- 14 J j' •JNI'Sil-LVIJossv)INJ 1 MOG UNV1H.1110S• I i ! Y .,.,.a....�s.,..,.M,.....,.. Al aSVra a !M013011O39 i,1:!i ' , 1 ! 1 1 gl1i1 i I Pr,f1 ()7, nI`+f'(imp c : ' .. I; s ; ; n I �� 3 i l ! ej• ' ia a r ;£t y� � . .l.k a; cr•J§ 8 ° i'',t iii ? ?d� �t 1g , g j f� — eft(� 'v'..Y._.. ,-- V' o - _1 6 R r,`. l _ — _erg } < li lle � \ Ic' +•`" Ilst O ' ' J1 1 4 °r �..� t J ol_,, • b u 1.1-\-1:\-1-11:::".: a 1 g'',i Aga \4 Ii7 I V. ( i'o.1(j„1\11::\'''.''';'‘‘:::.-'.----:P.*::t.. , ••1y N, :::E8:11.1 ii-.;-.:' Ii ,,... II L:Iii jil, N g i f 4. 91 n i i p —----43. i 1 I14 ,62v1 "!: —----i --1_ ' ',-JN gpyi{ ..� , ,.. . ,• • d •L . • !e I �i ! I, , A t , is , I , 1! i , • ,k, . ill ,1 stI2 j.: , ,, , - r. i ?'.-,r^..:( i .�l. „'i �� i 1� I . � El.---,!1' " I � ��Y 1' A AA•\_ % Alt' l t''i i ' t O N! $ ' i a W I k:$ x..lZ! 17,4 ' r .'11 ,.1 i• i lag is —,.,4'., II I r. ,. ,.„,,ti , ; .. i i ip_ r ,„, _ .._ _ ,.. ,: . so,„ I F 4t.._ I _y IgYI 1' t:. (f' 3 e. tip 99 _ 1 1, .i LI I, �; I 1 i Ili J -^ •I Oi IA=i• =i� ,�t eta e. Tit '1� I r! � � 41 i I e to 1�' �1 IP ':' 1 Si F ' - C III M.-! , ji I , I sik; YY8 e1j� 1 § sal _ i ':-1I �B 1 - i' - ' 'i1 �� I i�� ti �� ii i li v xv YYi $ , i I 1 I o IS j;i ,I i a ,� I I 1 Lp77 i .ili �} 1— — 11.1 1�1Ye if 7!f 4Y#i I , — I d —4 i a. Ye' 3 i ? t IL U Ca joi j f LLI !i :i i ! tii a` 7,- IS (pi CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-267 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.52 ACRES, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 2A2 OF THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL (rage ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety. morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using L:\CITYDOCS\ORD CASES\480-267.WPD Pagel 7�j— 1 C., the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed (iso, at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers. promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake. Texas. and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately 2.52 acres, legally described as Tract 2A2 of the Thomas L:\CITYDOCS\ORD CASES\480-267.WPD Page 2 —1/3—1 1 (se' Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the'City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of Ltransportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to Cany and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether L:\CITYDOCS`,ORD'CASES\480-267.WPD Page3 --Mr18 pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR C L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-267.WPD Page 4 -7 fL- 19 (bpi ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY L C L.\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-267.WPD Page5 (bre EXHIBIT "A" BEING 232 acres situated In the ThCt A5 EASTER SURVEY, Abstract 474. Tarrant County, Texas and being 9 9 remainder ��Records,tract eTyirerD to ant =o�tTexas,Nettleton being as recorded In Volume 9 more particularly described as follows: BEGlNV/NG at a 5/8 inch iron rod round in the south line of E. 5o.th4ka Blvd. (Fr nee), sold point also being tie northeast corner of a tract conveyed to Georgetotl Monticello Partners, Ltd. as recorded In County Clerk's File No. D19702150* T.IENCE: 5 70d47WE along said south i►ne for a distance of 30120 feet to a 54 inch iron rod found 1n the nprrrrnoat west line of a tract conveyed to artily Sharnc/1n is recorded in Vokane 8710. Page 747. Deed Records. Tarim Co a7te. Texas: ri4EN'CE: 5 OOder381W along said west line for a distance of 33635 fast to a pol►►t In the westernmost north tine of said danicIIn tracts T,-JENCE: N 89d 587?111 along said north line for I distance 28453 feet to a 3/4 inch Iron pipe found in erns aforex+entlonsd east line cf GeorgetC'u" Monticello Partners. Ltd. tract: r.IENCE: N 00d Ol'3B'E a!Ong Bald east line for a distance or 43537 feet to Ow pa/NT CF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 2.52 acres of land, more or less. as surveyed by Stevan c11. Mgr+ea. Regels:40,d Prcfess/o►naI Land 5crveyor d‘r►ia ere month of occw- !99 7. C L:\C ITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-267.WPD Page 6 7 8-2J (we EXHIBIT "B" ,jj, -3NI'S3LVI30'3S1/NI\1,3. SVXRL TIY1111.110S I1 1 el lio . —. Al3SVHd )DIVd NMOlg011OgD 1--r.1.1 !' ..„...-............., ...11,, 1 raw r a.9311 ' . ' )' — .-•• 11 't . ', 4.i-•,1 r 1 . , ' _ 4 i- fp.... • . ! i , _.":7 — p.,. . ..1, : . •l'' : k hi 5 , 5;•51 , it ? 9 IP 11 i ; • g.. ..11 ' ; •"4i ; 111 4 i " I •-?911(-;,. i: .'2 1 'Ail.• il - . '' , el 3 6,,r I • r r J ! ' I 1 - cfk xi) -4s-e, (14 4•-.4-7,) 1", g ' , • : ' ,., 1? 1 :1:',.. - .,2::•,---....!,.,,.,:----._ , r t !t:i , ,..,-r'.‘,,c7. -1l.t5i.-1-.. ,.1-• 3•,4•,-.„..„„,,-,-e-.-.._._ :i3; IH I , -... - i oV0. i :• 4i: ' i ';'''' -i '''• c.1-'-i•-....---'-'---....---- 7-,..:-. ---' _-.- ., q lor! ,p .g .?:qr,;,',ft ,. ; -- . _ ' '...-,\i ,,,--'-.,,,, •,.?';',fr'', 1,1%........... l§; , 5 ..', ,,!' ,i .• 1 _: II ., 1 r 1112..n;i: , ' ' i-- 1 ,A.', ' i ' • ;.,.,.,,_. 1.\,, , ,,,,,;‘\,,,, t1$,..:-...-,.::,,,-,.___ ........,..--, ......,._ , 4 .,:Igfi lir ''l • I . 1 • ,, \'. _-‘7' - ' !.10 Li 4z.,111 I• ICI .41 ii ...".• i! • ; , [ !:1 [Iti 1 li...3,4 : 1 s • .t,....., ' . ',3.(II!i ( :''i, .). - ii. . ..: - ri : : f . • :.4. !, „ •• '11 :r.,-M . , ; q••,! . --i ,' 1 Z., !', N'''''''-.•— . ' r ' t' rF:3 -6, , • • b,- 4 % !: : 1 .S; ?: i, . : , , ;,,, .,, v•.,,, ... ••J.--' ', ir ,, . t tli - -., 3.- f.'.i ' ' '• ' - s'' '' ''. , '? '' ' : • .. •:' ,1 E : ..; p. i • . T—.:?.e A;•• I ; !• !! k 1 ---, 1 „ ,, ..: ,i i r,_ \, :1,1" c___,........\..- ‘.-...: i •, , ; 1,t NI 0 •,-, :." ..,1 : , , ? .. 1,L,1,1 i, '' if -' '" ' : 1 1:_!! • 1 ' lE ;,-..; ,, e,„1 !, " - ' 1 • .. git?4 .' '.r..?,,, ,, r?',.!,?.1. ', ;1,. 1''',..;...-- !Ir. -:-.., •I: ';. \I .- I : : ' 6'12 , 1 icloi , r.1,, :,:,t , . - ,„ , - . . a.P !'-.--------------il'Iri .L n - - . 1,-- ;.,;::', ;.!,,,,,i, ,, 1 , 0 co' - .'., p,i.!....0 , 1 , cr R r ''7-71t:' ''''-7-777---771 . " . " CL 111 ' :ii 1‘ , ''ulgi -----.:,. , • k' -1 J ,,. •. , . 1-41 ,.'!.::': 72 i ,---Li--1 '!IL!f: •- • ', 1.; 1 • -•-, tl. , ,•t:i`, ' . i, 1 1., p1511i ;4.'itti li: --a-lf,-,,,— . .,-i fa f ,t r, 5 11 - 01 -.31'--.'6- '—. ,7,7 f• *' ' .(3 i,V •: lyi i,,,, ,\ r_in ',!: !i ;. 1.!.7i ' 1 . , ,' ,1 i',- . --..: . .',.., . .•_•.:i ';.41 '. !:!4!,!0. ',.ii 1.; iii i '•-, il; 3 : i., ,_t 1 1 ' I 1 1 ;1 ..,if.. a 1;11 71 .. ': • V: ! 33 .. , ' iii •-z 1 ,,) 2 . 3. -1 '..1 ti,1 •• I: •",., :.7 . I I' . ':. ,og' R !ill 311 i..• il q iii . ,...-c 1 '-• : x::‘ it; 'ZEI 'I: i i . , a 1 . ; . ,.,,A ,,,,i ,,, i . .: 1 I ;11 tl ' 1!1' ''' , . !1.11 gH l'il [ §81 20 ' '`I ,., .• g !: : i , . -.-.4.1:-'•. if. karl , 1,g 13.13 ”1 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-267.WPD Page 7 -15-22 City of Southlake, Texas 1 Cm° STAFF REPORT January 30. 1998 CASE NO: ZA 97-151 PROJECT: Revised Preliminary Plat- Georgetown Park STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner II, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Preliminary Plat of Lots 1R and 2, Block 1 Georgetown Park, being approximately 6.63 acres out of the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tracts 2A3A, 2A3C, and Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No.3434, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. AMENDED REQUEST: Revised Preliminary Plat of Lots 1R1, 1R2, 1R3, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Georgetown Park being approximately 9.15 acres out of the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, Tracts 2A2, 2A3A, 2A3C, and Lot 1, Block 1, Georgetown Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide No.3434, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. (ittaw, - 1 ck of East Southlake Boulevard. approximately 2400- to 2500 b o 400' to 600' east of Bluebonnet Drive on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard OWNER: Georgetown Monticello Partners, Ltd. & G.M. Nettleton APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. ''CS'' Community Service District and "AG" Agricultural District. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Retail Commercial NO. NOTICES SENT: Fifteen (15) RESPONSES: Three (3) responses within the 200' notification area were received: • G. M. Nettleton, 2611 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, (17 Texas, in favor. rid I • City of Southlake,Texas • Liberty Bank (Gary Price) 2438 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. • Roy E. Lee, 2620 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas, in favor. P&Z ACTION: November 20, 1997; Approved (7-0) to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the December 4, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. December 4, 1997;Approved(6-0)to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the December 18, 1997,Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. December 18, 1997;Approved(6-0)subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated December 12, 1997, modifying Item #8a (R.O.W. intersecting F.M. 1709 at 90°) to allow for a minimum of 85° reconfiguration, and deleting Item#8b (60' R.O.W. width). COUNCIL ACTION: January 6, 1998; Approved (7-0) applicant's request to table to the January 20, 1998, City Council meeting. January 20, 1998; Approved(7-0)to table and to continue the Public Hearing to the February 3, 1998, City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met the requirements of Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated December 12. 1997 and Plat Review Summary No. 2. dated January 2, 1998 with the exception of those requirements in the attached Plat Review Summary No. 3. dated January 30, 1998. L:TOMDEV WP-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-151PP.WPD 7G _ a _--,MANNA iI -, / ,_ _V i l ;,' r>. - - - -- . L -- Joti - ':, / .r. ® _ I- ,i1 - _may -- �-^- Y� I NJ� i _ p4 _ Atimio______r____ t -^- H77. i-- /- Ng 1 t a I I' • til 9/14 Ni -- 1 e a~©i l) I-F c F M1 p�J7 r1C �: ,��_ ^^1 Y ®N%U(i-le�t-'ll�/ll YIIQUV = ` .'E, :91'SE 5' 9912.''.4 29E i , 1 , , , , , , ,7, , 6 h SWAY A-1 _ 1_14sit..f7 : 1 N.-P Ze_ E _eo ,c z4a n p , t. :D 2G � �i 1 ,771117 P y __� __ ' 4444 4... f_42,11�R�'N 5T 0FA ® � 1j�C,',�p g- iiiii x • _ p�K r--- -- --- 1J1Y'' tN --- Mir_1:123 p6RE5_l 1 ram— (� - ,l MOM1E 1E2 • ;A• . v sIcr •-ase EA''T V 1 - NE MAN fARRAR _ OP mil CO •' 1A • 7i_ ! • -14 —w,Et SJt;-N.ucE 8_.'0 r a! ! i -.• . 11 i • 'N1p,+F ,,.,— ,_ ... ., ,s•© `-4 2q7. 2A:A 2A1A - ' /L r i. .� J 2: -----I i \ i -TT \..._ 1'�1 _-_._.__._._._ aPPfEf A1Nf t1 l I�-Tr�# —may i ---- --= J.E Ac ''� �0. - S `` ll 1 ; __• %.J_ ,_yil+[ ,l, 1 \ -L lVY'__ jf 110 H�6r12 1'I - 0j R 1 -_ JND 1. 1 E -'IH 0''A &,'44--feaTlitr E421-:\-----:13;644 :F)LP' sv 4C -r 1 1 1 `� .1. -- f R --�— ` I ; _ Ili _ 'r 444 , t 1 m`� • ` 1 :,CAA i , SE' i 1 1 � .. .. 1• 4' 6.15 Ac --l A ORIGINAL PRELIMINARY PLAT • F (. 26: ii 6E 9 0 9 1 4 E9 --- ;\ E_ti p-OW- PpR'` REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT r 11 ; I iEL me ama L D ! ,I , 1 / _i_.. -i-*, •„Amory A-101J I J T'- 1: • I= III j 7C_ r am_-'`'' .'VI".. U I V F- rn1 = ,• © U CN 1 N cI CC n m (1117' * N � F- r Csi i Q'� 1.r Q O O xU) UI _� Z r NO 0 z W �1w J >� i qI - Q Y cc_ a ~ C 7 ¢ Li) w _ Cr) - 1 CC LU C. ln o C/)wQ w� ; n : � Z <Q Ce WWZO =• j4tagoei__ w iQ _ = = � wU_ �w Z ('Z Q Z w N PI o ( o CN CC Z • c� ZN U n Ill Q = m (N, 'Z' �/ Olt � Z LIJ L. � Q Q O 1 �� U I in Q r • Cr a - LL. >• = I w _ (� [C U I Q Q _ U /R N F" CC) w I \�� G--) I _ (.0 0 Z --- 'N •fie _ N < G Y i N < o r m co O — cn• ® . co n iiy U �\ N < 0 N Q F- p f� N CC Cn CC cn't rn F- x. ..,T.: C,Z5 ® s ra 1-N - 0 tD IMM.I.MME 6. f LK M: _ ___ _____ __ __ _. __ _.__I _-z3,3 -,--. -.p 9 c 1 t '� 113 2.• ( ••3 N i - ' =j'ff ' , pig ;;� a F.cmey N 1'. .} Ijg 11t ; t(We . r�rt.j t . 3i., � ! °," 7± fjiga.. i ' . I l' r x °Vs<zY < IZ; : a —i 1 ',hi } .,. Voli tsyl};z ti Fi is Y, :}} tt <`00- • ° 0<' ri! rya x 1 '"i l'i nt i.'{ .'; 3* vt i .30 R, - ti•h , .N 11 ;r J a tiig' B $ice L' R 0. 0 'r 1 I. i eI j11 2. O N ;, ~,- w_, r✓N j iy 2 \/ w a , a -a t,r11) !t` b NW ill, if 1 s F •� 1 1 ; aP hi 1!1 1 U94:• 1 v a`r 8 Di1111 9 :s 7 9+g O F 01 i . A ) iiI Q L N 'Cr cR1 �. Y7• 3 .z t. . CP j ' o /,' + 3g 3 a° J .37-6v __._ . ^S r_ ..C66Sy •.9t1O.0 S r• /• n1 • , :D h1 , l .8E� AWis /la. ' ',: !^, T - -_ _—_.— —_a77..w.wm,af \_-,^ ..,oz 3.90,0.0 5 k. 0 (yiS4 i, / : i3T % `f pis:ei L, ie I11 / `, 1 y.P 1, Ya /, ▪ ^f• F j Q l,,Ty 1 • •. ..� '�i•- i •� ....:pi.� .. - '' Nil• k. .•[� -• • • ' • • +�; � :. t� ;FTC-:5 -,a/' n 3- yy,1. a `rm .-.O)10 - jt• IhI•if i 3 I!itlj 4 he:,�il'j �31 i to -at ! a i1 1 ti $tli 1 11 I - < S I t a• 11,.:filS• 2, 111/ 4 1 ,t 1 1 ijiji t I 1 a1110 1W a < S 3, 11 z: i-. • , i ;! IJ ii t .� F V h i F•Z �lj�� j3lrr_, Ili li�i I tl• i i1! l ,ll �,; atIl1 1 jig , -j p o, .•i 3 i V:<<C g.<x' 1 x ill'Ti 1;•'9 Ji gi ? II •I - � , .111 ai! ttII t: F x.i i_ji tz va1�'� Arai }a i'iI� •� #'` �� Fg ^ ^.1- v i. 1:Iil g }- .1abi}l i t; ie } i- i G m I1i__; 1 , i+} j!li i} �JilJ s 3 i s .a 0 m 1" �, iiilaj t }R0. ;jil a'• Y 3} 551 2311 e!}}i 7Ya.J ! • .-It+ 111 i I 1 i al r ill 1 ' si;; 1 .��,l1! x'.; s5'•!x •s_ • el.1i; ljiil ::'.1 ,. -S e' 'llt}. i ... g t a. "pH- _�;i(! i7if. I11i 7i } 1i 71)11 1 , !fl: p,_ri i FO < ii ii!ll ;;rifi1 Yt.E:j±jt; !Y 1 t13.11':;►I! 11131 I i3 1 :t•;i: i it °3. _ i • t. I i! 1 ` o- • 1 I •i,. 2•!•t ai -141 i1 11! i j1i Hlt il•i i`l,}l 1 I 3 •ijJiill11ifiilIii lj1 I ji • \/ ° Si 1 Jt fc •: 1:.: , Ilia Q i i • / r a 11ii i1111l:Y1•ii:jat ,i 1 -.-I 81 i J t 4ja4 iiJiililliitii�illt} • 1 a-.ie 22 1 1— J '1 •i �ji•'l ii� t ,.�,i ii J aJt ij'7;•I�•y�]i!'Ji Jiff. , fi ! �•_ x l.Zi{--illiilleilli•.01 lily 1�.�3 ,l - a i tit'Ylttltilil+!J13:1ii :1.3 '1, L i , ., 112/ ",` j+ +•sy'; ii 33;`i+` „. f CC si"' i/��O ,.` g � /! slVi'Yi- ��l�..w l..n.n Ly a u��: ! 12' . i er 4. ? .� fi •J F •V.n.wA n o y :i• i x 2• J _ "`7 -rm.'•i�•1..A.wi . !1 t�v� ` ' U 4 rJ if. ,�. o..,.n..... _ I' �Z` fir. i ,..3 " _.or0►t\;- —-- —�•O—Oaoo I+'�; • 4 , _ • ' s,i1 s= il?1! .I. -:x i' '�to€� 0^'.. 7 .c } ry s }+:: r s \- �i.- w -`-_-- .--- - -,--- Arne --- --- --— 3.22.20.00 3 (--/y O r:1 /:i/. 1 J wow -q ,' o ' . .+ _Ie!: 1 i= : =�i1.v, 8 121 ° t :, <- 0 -111.1 i r. 3 t. t I I .r_�-- A..'.- t.t a F- ',. -..�- -�1 .sxl+t „ l` iQi it�E( 5 7�; o7F v —i 1i 't 3 33 t• �•• Zoo:.-a '•-o (.... °` _f: iR Y v j a 1i < . -. 1.! 1 Z . 1!:? r• ii %�Y 14t.. 71:f�: ~d ..-.-- !ei _ r" , .. Fief �i:3 _'i - H < V, 33 m ric-k City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 97-151 Review No: Three Date of Review: 1/30/98 Project Name: Revised Preliminary Plat -Lot 1R1, 1R2, 1R3.2.3 and 4 .Block 1 .Georgetown Park being 9.15 acres out of the Thomas Easter Survey. Abstract No 474 APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Realty Capital Corp Hughes and Associates 920 S. Main St. # 170 5750 Rufe Snow Dr.. Suite 76180 Southlake. Texas 76051 Fort Worth. Texas 76180 Phone: (8171 488-4200 Phone: (817)498-3511 Fax: (817)488 -5257 Attn:Richard Myers Fax: (817)656-9403 Attn: Steven W.Hughes CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/27/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that all lots abut a public or private street(§ 8.O1A). Reconfigure lots as needed to provide this street frontage. 2. Insure that all proposed lot lines are not positioned in a manner that would create a non-conformity for existing structures. * Staff would like to discuss with the City Council implementation of building setback lines for lots having no street frontage. 3. Provide proposed lot numbers for the Nettleton Tract and the lot east of the proposed Lot 1 R1. 4. The following changes are needed with regard to easements: a. Provide easements in accordance with plans approved by public works. b. Provide common access easements (CAE) in compliance with driveways as approved on preceding and/or subsequent plans. c. Provide all appropriate easements depending on the intentions to provide electric from the front or rear of the lots. 5. The following changes are needed regarding Right-of-Way dedications and interior street geometry: a. Provide a minimum 60'of R.O.W. for street shown along the east side of the Nettleton tract. The Subdivision Ordinance does not permit the dedication of "half rights-of-ways". The applicant has proposed 30'of the dedication to be within their property with the remainder to be dedicated from the adjoining property at a later time. L:\COME)EY\WP-PILES\REV\97\97151PP3.WPD Page 1 City of Southlake,Texas b. Provide a centerline curve radius for the proposed street ROW near its intersection with F.M. 1709 sufficient to meet the minimum street intersecting angle, minimum curve radius and minimum tangents required in Section 5.03 of the Subdivision Ordinance No.483 as amended. * The applicant should be aware that a study and analysis regarding collector streets for this area is currently being conducted. This may impact future development of this site and should be considered prior to any subsequent site plans or platting of this property. Changes to street locations may affect placement of proposed driveways. If such changes occur, driveway locations should be reconsidered with any subsequent plans. * Non-residential lots do not have a minimum lot dimension requirement. * It appears that this property lies within the 75 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone which will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No.479 and execution of the"Avigation Easement and Release" shown in Appendix 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 on subsequent Plats to be filed in the County Plat Records. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Realty Capital Corp Hughes and Associates L:\COMDEV\WP-PILES\REV\97\97151PP3.WPD Page 2 o 1 , .R - 04 n :o c.: : �a rc - .I...: r _ _ C ••- 41 1?n.u- 1 5 -- s„ �z.i C'l 0UnW� u C <1.1-f...-2z. •?4.2 A l'- ‘.,' - !,,z- ., 2:-%-4: -,....0 a � o - o JJ I H ▪1 .:z.: I,411.. 41.. . •O - g.6t - _•h .12 - -i Mho -, LI .-• 2�j•2VU' ' -`u= .e4 bt'-. r �s3 wo' "ill u9o -5' ofnd> $oi w4io 1 7, a, e.6_ 3s ^_ e r .a_, uy 2.Js c .- i 7,r 800- S2 - /' s „gymaa3Wm / II—•"i -- r i i l .I ... c c? I ; • • .• ll It / �\ 1 a = 'ii i_ II hiII / .� 'ii;l - I I I 3 . II - i .r r .irr ,./ ' I ti i I )r- ;�/Lf -I ; -I-1 I-- - -I.; r .,1 _- 1 1.= - -_- �I' 1.: ' / / i I I 1 I; 'i{Y l f11.1.4 ir:/ l / 'I it.f„ ir.i1:1i, I: rl Ii i E� � • 3 1 •II j I • / '. iq ! I - - - - — - _ — -- -- .,.. I L -.. __ � E /� / ;l- .I 71 WI; / ,I I; 3 II Ir; .. .ui- :: G.-.Salli....k. ' si Ilir ',Or ir---,...( Iirtill IIM-A ..11 ILO) th7*alltilrlam ` City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT January 30, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 97-130 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-261 Rezoning and Concept Plan - Southlake Garden Offices STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 Dennis Killough, Planner II, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as being approximately 6.1441 acres situated in the Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, and being Tract 5E. A Concept Plan for Southlake Garden Offices will be considered with this request. LOCATION: South side of East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) approximately 1,100' west of the intersection of Byron Nelson Parkway and East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) OWNER: 1709 Joint Venture kIre APPLICANT: Best Tex Custom Homes CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District AMENDED ZONING REQUEST: S-P-2 with "0-1" uses LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential II CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Four (4) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Steve Garrett, 205 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas. in favor. P&Z ACTION: October 9, 1997; Approved (6-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated October 3, 1997, accepting the applicant's City of Southlake, Texas commitment to remove the existing driveway from Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709)and extending the proposed street down to the existing residential pavement. COUNCIL ACTION: October 21, 1997; Approved (4-0) to table to the December 2, 1997. City Council meeting. December 2, 1997; Approved (5-2) to table to the December 16, 1997, City Council meeting. December 16, 1997; Approved (7-0) on consent to table to the January 6, 1998, City Council meeting. January 6, 1998; Approved (7-0) on consent to table to the January 20, 1998, City Council meeting. January 20, 1998; Approved (6-1) First Reading subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated January 16. 1998, deleting Item #2 (4:1 slope setback) and further requiring only the F-1 fence in all required bufferyards south of the southern most wall of the southern most building (no plantings and no irrigation required in this area). STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all requirements of Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1. dated October 3, 1997, Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 17, 1997, Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 26, 1997. and Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated January 16, 1998 with the exception of those items listed in the attached Concept Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated January 30, 1998. L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\MEMO\97CASES\97-13OZC.WPD ri 6 - I 10A 11A 12A6 "I713A 4.47 AC SURVEY 1A 2A A-687 12B— — TR 1 .409 AC r 1 B f 28 1 OB t 1 B J.M. STEV�NSON _. 2 r � / � � TR IIl .]I1 4 4 iii0 A-2040 'N, TR 5D1 TR 5D2 TR 5D5 k 2.365 AC 1.698 AC X 1.945 („ TR 5F , !�- ‘.N. -/ TR 5016 � � TR 5D2B 10.0 AC TR 5D6 3.948 0 2.78 5.351 0 TR 5D3 1.68 AC 202 ,as a rN ,« TR 5D b, 1.054 AC A wOOD DR SO p i4 24 Y U . a q 32 33 34 + '? ,a. s0 p -R 2A2 a 25 i O TR 2A5 a 26 = d +« ^ 2.398 AC • ,� e V TR 2A3 a1�9 ` 3� 4.712 AC ¢ 2 IR 2A 1 B " �` 4 .97 AC • :Q „ O a �121 �� 13 4.2 a I r ` s �,cyvh �. 14 +p 4, TR 2A3C n 10 Y CLAYTON CT '' 0 O �� 1.93 AC �.� +y x ,m J� ; D 29 s •' -9 4.e. Q 11p 3 A R ,m ' fr` 3 2 R + VO 2 - O p p M► a 10 Y O 4 / "�p� 5 p " " ., Q �..t(� 14 12 • s O TRACT MAP 10 •` z p , 4 �_ „ \i, s ' NOR__ I� -3 BRYSON WAY IS .14 .� 04 is OS as -'ram . v as ~ 1. t e IA TR 3 W. HALL _ t 4.47 AC SURVEY 1 A 2A A-687 10B -0 -- 'I. STEV NSON TR 1 .409 AC r 1 B 128 1 B --qUXY r ix_au 1z, o ! A- "40 - - - STATE OF TEXAS- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 117AG TR 5D1 TR 5D2 2.365 AC 1.698 AC R 7, WESTERRA "ZV: AG W AG g g r/Z ---� - TR 5D1B TR 5D2B ' N 3.9480 2.780 S. GARRETT 0 O ' >- >- U 0 I 7 I-- AG ,x V' .r.,,,,, ,,,,,,, - r• 1111 bi WESTERRA 'A FOOD DR c"--------j ._ r ..,, 111 E-3 Eillatallb---721: 2 Iffliggiv 17 PUD PUD 2CO y Mir m - 26 : ma x WESTERRA WESTERRA • 3 '� 'Zak �� fR 2A1 B 4 .97AC �� _" 11 - a '��.. 13 v s tti h') — �-� r 14 Y ,m �4. TR 2A3C NI i10 Y i gyp' Vp 1.93AC CLAYTON CT -- x1 z `-.../ "' H '� ADJACENT OWNERS R 11 Y 19 Y 12 ,o 0 A i soAND ZONING 0 is • 77 b Q 10 s � v ,z Ex-� 3 8 s 7 SPIN #" )RIN E 13 s s 114 12 s0 - t 7v � ! ( - 510I LESLIE THOMPSON / CONTRACT DRAFTING 214/637-3047 • 1320 PRUDENTIAL DR.,SUITE 101 • DALLAS,TEXAS 75235 (kr, MEMORANDUM / LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: January 26, 1998 To: David Ford Project: Southlake Garden Offices Subject: Revised Concept Plan David: The attached Concept Plan for the referenced project have been revised in accordance with the conditions approved by the City Council of Southlake, Texas on Tuesday, January 20, 1998 as follows: 1. The request for zoning has been amended from S-P-2 to S-P-2 with "0-1" uses. 2. The residential adjacency standards have been deleted from the drawing. 3. Two cross access easements have been shown from the entrance driveways of this site to the access points on the west property line. 4. The developer will request a conveyance to permit the southern entrance driveway to cross the City tract. containers and loadingzones have been reconfigured. 5 The screened trash g Three parking spaces have been deleted as part of this revision. 6. The bufferyard fence along the west property line will be limited as shown. 7. The limit of interior landscaping has been noted on the south side of Building "A". 8. The extent of bufferyard fence adjacent to the residential property has been noted. As noted in my transmittal to Dennis Killough on January 15, 1998 the following clarifications have been made: 1. The most northerly building lying adjacent to F.M. 1709 is properly identified as Building "C". 2. Entrance driveways and interior circulation lanes are dimensioned. 4. The median at each entrance driveway have been shortened to facilitate the entry of emergency vehicles as previously requested by the Fire Marshall. ce:to: Dennis Killough 9704.016 Transmitte by: �� Z./ ` City of Southlake,Texas i CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No: ZA 97-130 Review No: Five Date of Review: 1/30/98 Project Name: Concept Plan for"S-P-2" Zoning with "0-1" uses - Southlake Garden Offices, 6.1441 Acres:O.W.Knight Survey Abst. No. 899.Tract SE APPLICANT: CONSULTANT: David L. Ford Leslie Thompson. Contract Drafting P.O.Box 1702 1340 Prudential Drive. Suite 100 Roanoke. Texas 76262 Dallas. Texas 75235 Phone: (817) 491-0335 Phone: (214) 637-3047 Fax : (817)430-3620 Fax : (214)637-3047 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. ?0.'.`v'?fn^v'...z.40:w'•x:'Md:::. •:+'A:::. .Df+3..,='..t a':-4*. ...::ft: .z:.,:::::.:mm. 'g*?::::„...:::•'•i:::>;t •fi`7S.#6::.::::s•w:`:?tu"R:o.'aCF.:Y:Sti r:::t:r. a:{{o 1. Buildings must meet the 4:1 slope setback line from the Garrett tract to the west, The Richards tract to the east(designated as Low Density Residential on the Land Use Plan)and the Timarron Addition Northwood Park to the south and east(Zoned R-PUD). (C.C. Action 1/20/98: delete) If any, list proposed variations in permitted uses and/or district regulations. Additional C.C. Actions 1/20/98: requiring only the F-1 fence in all required bufferyards south of the southern most wall of the southern most building(no plantings and no irrigation required in this area). * This review is based on the"0-1" Zoning District Regulations. * The proposed loading spaces can be located along any drive lane not designated for Fire Lanes. * The applicant will be required to construct the proposed roadway if construction is intended prior to the City fully developing the site to the east.The applicant should also coordinate grading and fill with the properties to the east in order to support the street profile of the proposed roadway. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records,and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Although no review of the following issues is provided at the concept plan level, staff strongly recommends that the applicant evaluate the site for compliance with the following sections of the city ordinances prior to submittal of the site plan. Note that these issues are only the major areas of site co) plan rev and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements. City of Southiake,Texas • Vertical and horizontal building articulation of building facades per§43.9C lc, Ordinance 480. as amended. • Masonry requirements per§43.9C la,Ordinance 480,as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557. • Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and §43.9C3 and Exhibits 43-B and 43-C on Pages 43-12 and 43-13, Ordinance 480, as amended; and Parking Lot Impacts on interior landscaping in §43.9C3h and Exhibit 43-D on Page 43-14, Ordinance 480. as amended. • Residential adjacency standards per §43.11 and Exhibit 43-E on Page 43-15, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.12, Ordinance 480, as amended. • Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. • Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. Denotes Informational Comment cc: David L. Ford Leslie Thompson L:COMDEV WP-FILES\REV\97\97I30CP5.WPD C Ja,af ma swat%MAXI warn Writing"AO ADO men Si WA Ina*am+oz rdl uo•tint w 3 lOo `iL8i# 9tittAA"J 8301diO N3O1IY9 3)IV1H1f1OS _ 1 1 _ 1 ) j itt I I I 11i I .. i I1' I(0.1 1 I I I It ( i • J 11, I:i . ! II: 1' Ill __________ _____ _ I I 1 1 0) Qn • HWM"W- • P �`� i W1 III ! 1 i r N 1 it .iiimisz...-:; 474:.....t..;.:::_r_a..r.. ■ E P .,.. , , 1 1 r-1 L.D ._10 ,,, .1\2 II 1 4 p ■ L.:. z s:i 4 0 Nal ...:,,,,,..:.:..,.. ., .......:.#:,...:::iF.Ii..... _•, ! ..;.,_ i _..., 1 L ii t i 1 '., ° i "7 to It hi; 1I I. ! 111 11��t!11�0 111 i � ; i ti1 I 1.4F. IF AO .'' I I11 . f : i Ig 11i i 1i 111111 iI 1 ' to @ ' �111 II !. _ 1. - - ! i Est:Ili • 1 1 �1111 :I I III! 1111 }; tililt : _ , 0 I i : r'r?1pi . oli 6 rip i4 1,1 J1' I1. I. i11 l 11, • b f1. I °,i "° 1i�1� (1i ! , . 1,;' 'ihrriii lin `} ' . 11 1 I I I l I F s14 b r ' pit ip r 7 , _ cc I A it I5•f ,IE�rC l C� -= z "'will i miLit ,ti's-i' .1,1/,):40::,,... ".L"'"4i-i'll'eTtr, ',...c.s,6-.!)----•i; `„ - 0 1.1 ccth (D01.1Qr.••: /11 g 1 LL f'Al loll i •,. . 0 CO . i , :�� a ;�;, - - 1a1 3 --',� I ID0,11 R "1Ot'd��^�'41 - I; r a ��)` d ir e��0 . i 1 I •°1 111 a _.._ _ 1► �� --._.. I i E v r ' I ' 1 j 11, o V. �1 i ••\...w.•..-- j - i • `1'"'•"-• i i 1 3a I I, c.)Il 6.1 i \ 9 I 4 I 4 I 4 I 4 I i I I' 1I • NI i , • j , i , 4 i I. ! "1D-g CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-261 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 6.144 ACRES SITUATED IN THE O.W. KNIGHT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, TRACT 5E, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH "0-1" OFFICE 1 DISTRICT USES, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE (hire CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and L, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-261.WPD -7 (>q Page 1 Ci the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, (6..i WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding. of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be Ci altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately 6.144 acres situated in the O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract L:\CITYDOCS\ORD'CASES\480-261.WPD Paget D-�`'j • (lbw' No. 899, Tract 5E, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural District to "S P 2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" Office 1 District Uses, and as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; L.\ITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-261.WPD Page and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR C L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-261.WPD 7 Y- Iv Pave 4 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY C (me L:\CITYDOCS\ORDICASES\480-261.WPD 1 043 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at a Texas Department of Transportation brass monument found at a fetice-corner in the South line of State Highway No. 1709(Southlake Boulevard)(a variable width right-of-way)as widened,said point being 95.00 feet Southerly of and radial to the Centerline survey station 333+46.97,also being the Northwest corner of the herein described 6.1441 acre tract in the common line of said Bailey tract and that certain 10 acre tract of land conveyed to Steve Garrett and wife,Dixie Garrett,as recorded in Volume 6747, Page 1622,of the DRTCT; THENCE South 83°32' 18"East,along the said South line of S.H. 1709,and an existing fence line,a distance of 253.15 feet to an iron pin found at a fence corner in the East line of said Bailey tract as referenced in Boundary Line Agreement as recorded in Volume 9823, Page 1073,of the DRTCT,said point being the Northeast corner of the herein described 6.1441 acre(said Bailey)tract.also being the Northwest corner of that certain 10.4043 acre tract of land as conveyed to Timarron Land Corporation(formerly Bear Creek Communities,Inc.)as recorded in Volume 9823,Page 1078,of the DRTCT; THENCE South 00°22'51"East,with the common line of said Bailey and T narron tracts and an existing fence line,a distance of 1050.22 feet to an iron pin found at the fence corner in the North line of that certain 19.9873 acre tract of land conveyed to Buttercup Lane Joint Venture as recorded in Volume 8195,Page 1715,of the DRTCT,said point being the Southeast corner of the herein described 6.1441 acre(said Bailey)tract as referenced in said Boundary Line Agreement,also being the Southwest corner of said Timarron tract; THENCE South 89°49'53"West,a distance of 251.34 feet with an existing fence line to an iron pin found at a fence corner,said point being the Southwest corner of the herein described 6.1441 acre(said Bailey)tract,also being the Southeast corner of said Garrett tract; THENCE North 00°22'53"West,with the common line of said Bailey and Garrett tracts and existing fence line,a distance of 1079.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 267,639 square feet or 6.1441 acres of land,more or less.iE: This property is subject to the Order Adopting Airport Zoning Regulations of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport,Ordinance -100,as recorded in V.7349,P. 1106,Real Property Records,Tarrant County,Texas. C Page 6 1D-iy EXHIBIT "B" L ......_____.:._ . . s.._ ........ .....::... WO....n..r..;a vane ter, W... 911ilt1M1Is°J i1.41 'WM AIN O lIM1M•l 7ri111/1p.A A LIO 134114 KM 11310)1!1M)I L...-4 VOI 14v11 IA1?404 830t110 N3CRIY9 3)1Y 1Ninos 11 I — I _ ` < I:i I I I IIf j I i:I t i !;i 1. I I I III •i ii I:i i — i f i —'- -_J_— III ii------ ----- are by i Illili Ili N f �� I ' ( — _. _ _ "f 1 1 1 1 �� ,! � 0 (� i ' 'ram•�— i,l,+ ��!! • i s If i 1 _ 1 1 .' I I it P I I O;l'I 1 ;11 ai l ti j i i r 1, I IS, M. 1! '! f !_�� q 11 i I 1 III if NI to j - 1� e� a (iJ': : : IIf L iiiii • 0 tiil < HI fit ' �f �� # 1 'I• ,�I II ! S11 li ii 1 i q .1 ' : tI ly ,. U111/lif;i1 ail li Iliil iij 11}!g I .1- [- Ii a —- I 1 ily�I j�1 ail.,, Ph; Ili;s!Pi!! ii 1 Y�C 1 1 i 1 ! • p le;i'i i3A OW! I 11';1 l S F• i -- I i! j1 y i i , P, I ,,,i I ]ra i- I — I �1 P P i !., !it ,,�, II I�0}'� c, 1 1 11 .17 I Ili Pie ih! w y � � }II37'!i�l:iiil 1w1:I41vi 1:1.:i �J i i� • i h f 1- I�` ;` ,ter rr I �4i>P I1I 1;'f4,1I�;' ,?,ii:�'jl 1I II 1i11: _ +. ' - = 1 \\�� r; s 1. - ;11 ;fyl i�iaf`�'f`�I NINO,i6I I(; hf: J _ — _` ; i \� i w 111 I ira1eP1ii/IIli71,!i.4 i 11! 0 a\ �' I III: 1 1111R'=., : -\\ 4.4..0.-s z /a�� 1 i CV I ii ` I �' /.� 41 '` /; / _ o 11�� 410.4,0 ��III q .- �.. �3 I 1 :1 II 0- ;i I 9 - {9iiW "� 1�.-•1 I"Eli .• W i V. W___."t. I^ ii -1- 1 i___,... i ! 1�:is i!! °i AK, .1 II; \. d i ; i ; j ; jlil. _.._ \— l_.._ .J ._.•_—L.._.._'_. _.. i I ill�. — .,' IIli 1 j 1 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT January 30 1998 rY CASE NO: ZA 97-176 PROJECT: Site Plan - American/Sabre Parking Lot STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Planner II, 481-5581, ext. 787 Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan(for additional parking spaces)on property legally described as Tract 3 situated in the Wilson Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, and Tracts 1A, 1A1, and 1A3, situated in the Charles M. Throop Survey, Abstract No. 1510, and being approximately 2.689 acres. LOCATION: On the west side of West T.W. King Road at the intersection of West T.W. King Road and State Highway 114. OWNER/APPLICANT: Maguire Partners on behalf of American/Sabre Group CURRENT ZONING: "NR-PUD"Non-Residential Planned Unit Development for a Mixed Use Business Complex, known as Solana, to include the following uses: "0-2" Office District, "C-3" General Commercial District, `'B- 1"Business Service Park District, "CS" Community Service District and"HC" Hotel District. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATION: As yet undetermined NO. NOTICES SENT: Three (3) RESPONSES: One (1) response received: • The Town of Trophy Club, Texas (See attached letter). P&Z ACTION: January 22. 1998; Approved (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated January 16, 1998, reconfigure the parking stalls surrounding tree #420 to relocate them on the site, as agreed by the applicant, and allowing Item#6 as shown. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the requirements of Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated January 16, 1998 with the exception of those requirements in the attached Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 30, 1998. L 1E - 1 •=S --U 1 T:es I D:TFCFHY CLUE Fax Ha: 1-317-491-5 17 P01 07 FAX TRANSMISSION TROPHY CLUB ENTITIES 00 MUNICIPAL OR. TROPHY CLUB.TX 76262 8 1 7/430-1 9 1 1 Fax. 8 17/40 I-03 1 2 FACSIMILE COVER PAGE To: Karen Gandy From : Cathy Morgas Sent: 1/22/98 at 4:27:22 PM Pages: 1 (including Cover) Subject: ZA 97-176 Karen, Here is the Information that I would like for you to introduce this evening at your City Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. It is a letter indicating our opposition to your City placing a parking lot on land that we feel is a part of the limits of Trophy Club. I will let you know our findings from the engineer. Thanks for your time. *rely, Cathy Morgas L rTE j N-22—•98 TAU 17:08 ID:TRCFHY CLUE FAx NO:1-817-491- 312 tt,;©C FOG'0�r To: Cathy fbroas + Fro.: John Hill 1-:Z-98 ?:25Om p. 2 of 2 (lire COWLES ck THOMPSON 1•L 10U7391a R_31,92 zoo A rnoreoanmAA colroMTloN vnioav 7.memo M OP-44 t A1Tp19�i19 A7 aw ��%�!ts721 642-a000 901 WINKAEiT,sums moos 100 M.MAM:AVE,Win 721 3AUA9,11•xa9 76202441111 r O.p%T�6 TEM/LG Tama 7ssosp79s JOl9�f M.Wu Q1a1 e7a•20'00 Tae'roFE 12,41 77.•3300 1274/072-2n0 Almu� memo ern 2goeos OW aYAtOCAN Oe N,0 9UfTl77f oniou scow FAx 2141 a 92 03Q0 POPE9Ji.tmr 323 71a33.Taxan ri7p17��a cops=901neLL9 1es9091E 1se91 A70 7s00 t1 s2s.1 soa1 January 22, 1998 Planning&Zoning Commission City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Members of the Planning&Zoning Commission: I serve as the Town Attorney for the Town of Trophy Club, Texas. It came to my attention yesterday that the Zoning Commission is to consider a site plan this evening regarding certain property located adjacent to the Town of Trophy Club. We have reviewed the area of the proposed site plan and it appears that a portion of the area, as shown on the attached map, is within the original limits of the Town of Trophy Club. We, or other process which would attempt to regulate or control that land in TrophyClub. zoningore, object to any Very truly yours, 4/144F.04.4. John M. Hill JMH:wn cc: Ms. Donna Welsh L 2 rE -3 . jAhi 99 -^I_ ...7.:;19 tD:TPCFHY CLUB = `+C:_- -191-9312 tt30e JAN-19-1998 17: 1G TEPGUE NFLL PNE PERKINS 8.T ;AN-19-'96 'O'i 14:23 ID:TROPHY CLUB FAX Nc:1-917-491-9312733bc 43 P83/03P.02'Fk ], I ' f.w _ .�^- _ .,F ir`, _' 4 Ilk.t yy�� y,y �: 1111011 - S e ../ir,'IVAkte 0 V',,-...2:47:-._ 'elf 4' 1 ° :.A I/A, - , ----7.--14 'A, ' ibaill i I I ! j" 1! \.-i IN ,4;/ ` k!:! e. aft L � id �! - � / 2. " % % r:'i; y j , , ti I ' jN, , a . �, ice,: / • * ' O' " -41C11 l'i..1 PIO RI! . "� IIft, 1,,to\\* \,s, ;:te‘ lig 1 .N,Ni ;\. ,"�`, w• it ` �, 4 <4> !ice �I it • ,a s.` • \ ' \ it ifl .‘, 'A .,.. sv : ,*':` . .....,,,,:-. - , ' -.:, ' :,.1/4 i ).....,: 1 , •1,..,‘ i ,- \ii• -4. " - 41/ '•f:ii....?..-...30k. ,..\\,s..,.. !.(iL : , , : ! . . 11' _ ` /�/ • /v, ' ' ' .4 L .,. , y /r(.�.. !`,..•,,t j : ' ' / ta„ 7 .: "4fj1// 707: u. . . :ate •, M:ft l -.A- T 1 • *V*, / ;If r.., ! or \' ---- i„„t 4: :.s. i'• 410• ill coif li I Nj > I \ .I 11 fri I e 1 ifli1!!i1i1j il / f i I r7 F-4i TOTAL. P.02 r (Iiigre --- .."-- • 1 _ --- ' - �., �I�� / \ ` , imp 1 L - -- --- -- No .'�l -_ :Ail., .,, T�K� \pQ I _ \N'---.. , • I • 1--a r-5T�5 • cie, TRACT MAP ^(:'fir' ,r� 4. i 3.61 AC Lial.66.....4.0..u.am4Limcsana j.....w L 0 0 33 AC. IN i (3 Nc4 i, .1, , i 1 ,-. AV '% N. 1HENRY ►i �! ME�E` Y TR 1D R C'f \` J SU R`�4.2 12.950 ® I 1°' i � , ,� � g A �tf7\ TR 1 C 1 A . 1 7 K�2 IBM S ` .18 © i 3 I B M CORP I \ , A, 3.921 AC � 4 \ oTs9o " TR1 "NR-PUD„ ® k TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB 3A�� 3 3 .055a TR 3C ,, 3.921 AC TR3.01 \�� 2.169 a i \ �.i•♦� 3C2 c , 2 A2 AIM; ! tS'♦ 1 A2A 232 1 0 jB )16 ♦ L T. (lbw \ iR 1A5 .0150 1 Cr♦ .290 WM 24.51,E 1A1 . .10 . ., 0 I 7., Q', IIMMI, . ,: :,(-7,] ♦ 1A3A I ; y _..--; ‘4).4 \ .83 1111111 I '' ♦ 1. MTP-I B M 1 B .\ , i 2C.162 120.152 0 \ i 1 ♦ v T:R I i i A II IA STATE OF NR-PUD TEXAS TR i t ♦ 1.86 AC 1♦ i ADJACENT OWNERS TR 1 1.35 AC AND ZONING L 1 7E _6CX TR 1 .68 1 AV 1 Ull t/ ` I \ e City of Southiake,Texas , SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY e No.: ZA 97-176 Review No: Two Date of Review: 01/30/98 Project Name: Site Plan - Sabre Group Parking Lot APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Maguire Partners Huitt-Zollars Nine Village Circle Suite 500 3131 McKinney Ave. Suite 600 Southlake. TX 76262 Dallas.TX 75206 Phone: (817)430-0303 Phone: (214) 871-3311 Fax : (817)430-8750 Attu: ' 'chard Kuhlman Fax : (214) 871-0757 Attn: Ocie Vest CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1/26/97 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 787. 1. If any, show and label pedestrian walks, malls, and open areas for use by tenants or the public. 2. Driveways require a minimum 75' of stacking depth measured form the ultimate R.O.W. line to the intersection of a drive lane or parking stall. The provided stacking depth for both driveways is approximately 12'. (P& Z Recommendation 1/22/98: allow as shown) Show the orientation,type and height of any intended lighting. Additional P&Z Recommendation 1/22/98: reconfigure the parking stalls surrounding tree #420 to relocate them on the site, as agreed by the applicant. The applicant has complied with this recommendation. 1 cc: Maguire Partners Huitt-Zollars L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\97\97176SP2.WPD C 1E-8 • I G11 F. 0O 1 i s r° z ' C7 CIt' .7 x Cr) Y g�• is i p6 c� co.. r, 1,1 y i.-21 :II t., n i 1:,:- i!.-=' zie s �o aliitl ill 551 zi;igl9 j W o w 1 • ! \\,• ` tl` a CIS "j a". L — ! ` iR= tsa i� \ f a =/ 1t. ;ic v // \ ail \ •= / /,''''';''''';'ff'14P/t.:-Ft'...:,.:.-1 .;' ' ,/.'''s--/..-, '------ . - (7. ." 1-11 .-. / �' ;; X• (`� dry•' / / I; /// r/ � ( � r _ r • ///,(-r--7,c_i:...1,,1..,..._11,1,,,,,',./.ic 71/:-40.‘\,(\),,\'‘.',,,1,.)'s:-... 7/k.! ii _, 4;\''' //-' s.,_., '1\\ '-sAc..?","...., 1 ' 3 '',‘,4.06,s‘••,\‘,\s ..! • ‘ \ '..:.\\\ o v} •CF lea; �,10, '< �, 3 •" r-.\ , er:,. \\ „a as _\ .( ..,;-.. ,,, '\ Tit'. \s't'' .1 -; il ii' ! ' ' 1'\\ ,'aC\% /;10` ; /:sit *4 x i tI i k ' 'l� II �'� r �a: '�I•[t� !% / � ',x / I 1 N YI \ Y. ilt � �l� I �.11, , l jiIp /�� i +7a.�yy o f !� i 2 I ill C 3-'':;ii,;.. 'it" o }1ra 1-ja g• ;"ri j inn S f iR y �ij��:�� L'r��Fl Fi• c. j _ I 1 :i�!_1ui11 a N City of Southlake, Texas i • ‘11111w MEMORANDUM January 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 691, Approving Retail Base Rate Reductions for Texas Utilities Electric Company Pursuant to the Public Utility Regulatory Act, municipalities have exclusive original jurisdiction to regulate the rates, operations and and services of electric utilities within the city's corporate limits. On December 22, 1997, Texas Utilities Electric Company ("T.U.") filed a Petition and Statement of Intent to Implement Base Rate Reductions for retail electric service within our city. The petition and statement of intent is attached for your information. T.U. is requesting approval of an ordinance ratifying the rate reductions, and your packet contains an ordinance prepared by our city attorneys to do so. It should be noted that the Steering Committee of cities served by T.U. met on January 8, 1998 to ie discuss how cities should respond to the rate reduction proposal, and recommended via a model ordinance sent to cities on January 13 that member cities accept the rate reductions contained in the T.U. filing presented to the Public Utilities Commission (via a "Stipulation") and pass a most favored nations provision to ensure that the residents of each city receive the maximum relief offered to any portion of the T.U. system. The committee also determined that it was appropriate to intervene in the PUC proceeding where T.U.'s Stipulation is being considered to 1) seek greater rate reductions and 2) oppose provisions related to depreciation. In response to the committee's position on the last issues, Section 8 of the ordinance provides that while the Council approves the rate reduction, the ordinance should not be construed to mean that Southlake approves any depreciation shifting procedures as a means for T.U. recovering uneconomic investment in generation plants. It is staffs position that this issue is best analyzed by the Public Utilities Commission. Of course, approval of this rate reduction does not preclude us from approving future reductions. Please place Ordinance 691 on the February 3 City Council agenda for first reading. Questions about the ordinance may be directed to me or Debra Drayovitch. I i S/ Enc. Ordinance 691 L., Petition and Statement of Intent Notice to Ratepayers Article regarding rate case from Midland Reporter Telegram JAN-28-1996 09: 15 LAW FIRM 817 332 4740 P.02/03 ORDINANCE NO. - .>. _ ,_ .- _...- .. -. .+.` > . . ��- -. 'i '...:Y?. . 3.-_do- .t�.-r YY�.I=a: .c _ ,`~i<°r.,d'•. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING RETAIL BASE RATE REDUCTIONS FOR TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR; PROVIDING CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE RATE SCHEDULES AND SERVICE REGULATIONS OF TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY MAY BE CHANGED, MODIFIED, AMENDED OR WITHDRAWN, PROVIDING A FAVORED NATIONS CLAUSE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. On December 22, 1997,Texas Utilities Electric Company("TU")filed with the City of Southlake a Petition and Statement of Intent to implement base rate reductions for its retail electric service customers within this municipality,which base rate reductions are components of a settlement reached among various parties set forth in the Stipulation and Joint Application for Approval Thereof(Stipulation) filed with the Public Utility Commission of Texas ("PUC") on December 17, 1997. SECTION 2. The said rate schedules implementing such retail base rate reductions are hereby approved as the rate schedules implementing such retail base rate reductions within the corporate limits of this municipality until such time as the rate schedules of Texas Utilities Electric Company maybe changed,modified,amended or withdrawn with the approval of the City Council. SECTION 3. The aforesaid rate schedules herein approved shall be effective beginning January 1, 1998. SECTION 4. The filing of the rate schedules implementing such retail base rate reductions- being Rider RRD - Residential Rate Reduction, Rider GSRD - General Service Secondary Rate Reduction and Rider RD-Rate Reduction -shall constitute notice to the consumers of electricity, within this municipality,of the availability and application of such rate schedules. SECTION 5. Nothing in this Ordinance contained shall-be construed now or hereafter as limiting or modifying in any manner the right and power of the City of Southlake under the law to regulate the rates, operations, and services of Texas Utilities Electric Company. SECTION 6. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public and as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. MALIBRARrsowhLkc‘oRDrNANC\TUEi Tic2 JAN-28-1998 09: 15 LAW FIRM 317 332 4740 P.03/03 SECTION 7. Notwithstanding anyother provision of this Ordinance,the rates authorized for electric service is the City of Southlake Mall not exceed the lowest rates available to residents.,, of any other municipality served by TUEC finally resulting from TUEC's filing of the stipulation and any appeals from city ordinances therewith. SECTION S. The action of the City Council of Southlake in adopting this rate reduction ordinance should not be construed to mean the City of Southlake approves any depreciation shifting procedure as a means for TLTEC recovering uneconomic investment in generation plants. SECTION 9. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 199_ MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY (110, PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READI NG ON THIS DAY OF , 199_. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY — - EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney WLIBRARYSoutWnte\O WNANCVr1 rEleetrie2 • TOTAL P.03 s Lair MINI =MIN riff IMMINIM • .,�., t r.-A- • tn...,, _x' •:-•= `,14",. .+".?': A7w`;A''S'.'.i�',S1, _,;;" M °'f: i€?+C-4.)4N..?-q;P,t rek' :}�` `'+`"" C'-`.;' 'Y mammy 'mum wife T UELECTRI C' A r • , • • V • , C a w , • , ,_ R. D. Keeney Vice President December 22, 1997 TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL PERSONS OF ALL CITIES WHICH RETAIN THEIR ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OVER THE RATES OF TU ELECTRIC Ladies and Gentlemen: Attached for filing please find a Petition of Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU Electric) proposing a rate reduction for all retail customers. This Petition is identical to those being filed today with other regulatory authorities and affects all customers served by TU Electric. Le Also, transmitted with this letter as a part of this filing is a one-volume filing package containing a copy of the Stipulation and Joint Application For Approval Thereof filed with the Public Utility Commission on December 17, 1997, and the supporting testimony. A copy of the notice that is being sent to all our customers is also attached for your convenience. Should you have any questions concerning this filing, please contact the TU Electric manager serving your community. Very truly yours, _ RDK Attachment Receipt Acknowled ed By: Name: M e /� Cam' �� ,3-oH<_q��i��i f• City of : E pp c;"4.Li." Title: Assistant City Manager December 2 2, 19 9 7 ��'ij �'** \\ � Date: �nnmuu�� 'c%TAI'A • BEFORE THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF-SOUTHL AKE : APPLICATION OF TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC § COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT § DOCKET NO. RETAIL BASE RATE REDUCTIONS § PETITION AND STATEMENT OF INTENT TO THE HONORABLE GOVERNING BODY OF SAID CITY: COMES NOW Texas Utilities Electric Company ("TU Electric"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas and a public utility as that term is defined in the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Title II of the Texas Utilities Code (the "PURA"), and files this its Petition and Statement of Intent, respectfully showing unto this Honorable Governing Body the following: On December 17, 1997, a Stipulation and Joint Application for Approval Thereof and Request for Immediate Interim Rate Reductions (the "Stipulation") was filed with the Public Utility Commission of Texas on behalf of TU Electric, the General Counsel of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and various other parties interested in TU Electric's rates and services. A copy of said Stipulation, together with the supporting testimony filed by TU Electric with the Public Utility Commission of Texas, is submitted herewith and made a part hereof for all purposes. The Stipulation addresses several matters pertaining to TU Electric to be applicable during the two-year period, 1998 and 1999. An important component of the Stipulation is the implementation of base rate reductions for all of TU Electric's retail customers beginning January 1, 1998. Said retail base rate reductions are proposed to be implemented through the following rate schedules, copies of which are attached to this Petition and Statement of Intent and made a part hereof for all purposes: (a) Rider RRD - Residential Rate Reduction, which will effect a rate reduction equal to 4% of the base rate charges beginning in 1998, and a rate reduction equal to 5.4% of the base rate charges beginning in 1999, applicable to TU Electric's Residential customers: (b) Rider GSRD - General Service Secondary Rate Reduction, which will effect a rate reduction equal to 2% of the base rate charges beginning in 1998 applicable to TU Ele'tric's General Service Secondary customers; and 0 �-5 Lir �[ C i f - a 1 R de RD Ra1.,g�tedu ot: fstAs ?.� t. .,JAN- base rate charges beginning in 1998 applicable to all of TU Electric's retail customers other than those to which proposed Rider RRD and GSRD are applicable. TU Electric hereby requests this Honorable Governing Body to approve the said rate schedules for application within the corporate limits of this municipality beginning January 1, 1998. II. This Honorable Governing Body has jurisdiction over TU Electric and the subject matter of this Petition and Statement of Intent by virtue of Sections 33.001 and 36.101-36.111 of the PURA. III. All of TU Electric's customers and classes of customers in all areas over which this Honorable Governing Body exercises original jurisdiction will be affected by the proposed rate reductions. IV. Since this is a rate reduction for all affected customers, TU Electric requests, as authorized by Section 36.104 of the PURA, that the attached Riders be effective January 1, 1998. V. The business and mailing address of TU Electric is: Texas Utilities Electric Company Energy Plaza 1601 Bryan Street — - Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75201 TU Electric's business telephone number, including area code, is: (214) 812-4600 L -2- :f TU le ic r r , . lE Wit► fs aut o.ized ep esent,4tive are __�..�_. � .. e ,t,r,-. ,-. :.rah:•_..'... '". '� 015047, .-. R. D. Keeney Vice President Texas Utilities Electric Company Energy Plaza 1601 Bryan Street, Suite 32-002 Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 812-2778 and J. Dan Bohannan Worsham, Forsythe, & Wooldridge, L.L.P. 1601 Bryan Street, 30th Floor Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 979-3000 General inquiries concerning this Petition and Statement of Intent should be directed to Mr. Keeney at the above-stated address and telephone, or to the management of TU Electric's local office serving this municipality. All pleadings, motions, orders and other documents filed Li in this proceeding should be served upon Mr. Bohannan at the above-stated address. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, TU Electric respectfully prays this Honorable Governing Body to approve and authorize the retail base rate reductions as requested by approving the rate schedules attached hereto and to grant and award such other and further relief to which TU Electric may be justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, WORSHAM, FORSYTHE & WOOLDRIDGE, L.L.P. J. Dan Bohannan State Bar No. 02563000 _ 1601 Bryan Street, 30th Floor Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 979-3000 Fax: (214) 8801011 By , , ATTORNEYS FOR TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY L -3- ., Tariff for Electric Service Texas Utilities Electric Company 3.1 Residers '14k ?" ; r :jtirk,A-Vet.0:5 „4 -"lv'` �al Jung Effective Date: January 1, 1998 Revision: Original 3.1 .7 Rider RRD - Residential Rate Reduction Application Applicable to all customers receiving service under Rate R-Residential Service, Rate RLU-Residential Low Use Service, Rate RTU-Residential Time-of-Use Service, and Rate RTU1 -Residential Time-of-Use Service. If the Public Utility Commission has not acted by March 31. 1998.to approve or reject the Stipulation and Joint Application for Approval Thereof and Request for Immediate Rate Reductions('Stipulation"filed with the Commission in Docket No. 18490,and the City has not approved this tariff schedule by March 31, 1998,the Company may terminate the base rate reductions and all other aspects of the Stipulation then or at any time thereafter,upon giving the Commission and the City two weeks prior notice. In the event the Commission does not approve the Stipulation,this tariff schedule will automatically terminate as of the date the Commission enters an order inconsistent with the Stipulation. The provisions of the applicable rate schedule are modified only as shown herein. Monthly Rate In accordance with the terms of the applicable rate schedule, except that the amount under the applicable rate schedule,excluding the charges pursuant to Rider FC-Fuel Cost Factor,is reduced by 4%for all billings on or after January 1, 1998, and 5.4%for all billings on or after January 1, 1999. Lae' • Lase • ©1997 Texas Utilities Electric Company Rate Schedules 11.4 Tariff for Electric Service Low Texas Utilities Electric Company 3.2 General Service Sheet:24 .;.,t,t--.,., ..,. ,-_ ;.:h-4't'o Effective Date: January 1, 1998 Revision: Original 3.2.24 Rider GSRD - General Service Rate Reduction Application Applicable to all customers receiving service under Rate GS-General Service Secondary and Rate GTU-General Service Secondary Time-of-Use including any applicable riders. If the Public Utility Commission has not acted by March 31. 1998,to approve or reject the Stipulation and Joint Application for Approval Thereof and Request for Immediate Rate Reductions('Stipulation')filed with the Commission in Docket No. 18490,and the City has not approved this tariff schedule by March 31, 1998,the Company may terminate the base rate reductions and all other aspects of the Stipulation then or at any time thereafter,upon giving the Commission and City two weeks prior notice. In the event the Commission does not approve the Stipulation,this tariff schedule will automatically terminate as of the date the Commission enters an order inconsistent with the Stipulation. The provisions of the applicable rate schedule,including any applicable riders,are modified only as shown herein. Monthly Rate In accordance with the terms of the applicable rate schedule,except that the amount under the applicable rate schedule,excluding the charges pursuant to Rider FC-Fuel Cost Factor, is reduced by 2%for all billings on or after January 1, 1998. • (kw' ©1997 Texas Utilities Electric Company Rate Schedules 29.23 Tariff for Electric Service Texas Utilities Electric Company 3.4 Other - .' " .l �-,M - ="•Applicable:Cities ExenisinQ`�rfgivial Jtatisdidtdfi _ � , ` 9 Effective Date: January 1, 1998 Revision: Original 3.4.18 Rider RD - Rate Reduction Application Applicable to all retail customers receiving service under rate schedules other than those to which Rider RRD or Rider GSRD are applicable. If the Public Utility Commission has not acted by March 31. 1998.to approve or reject the Stipulation and Joint Application for Approval Thereof and Request for Immediate Rate Reductions('Stipulation')fled with the Commission in Docket No. 18490,and the City has not approved this tariff schedule by March 31, 1998,the Company may terminate the base rate reductions and all other aspects of the Stipulation then or at any time thereafter,upon giving the Commission and City two weeks prior notice. In the event the Commission does not approve the Stipulation,this tariff schedule will automatically terminate as of the date the Commission enters an order inconsistent with the Stipulation. The provisions of the applicable rate schedule,including any applicable riders,are modified only as shown herein. Monthly Rate In accordance with the terms of the applicable rate schedule,except that the amount under the applicable rate schedule,excluding the charges pursuant to Rider FC-Fuel Cost Factor,is reduced by 1%for all billings on or after January 1, 1998. For Rates RTP,RTP-I, and RTP-I-1 the 1%reduction is applicable only to non-fuel related charges for all billings on or after January 1, 1998. • • Le' :y c 1997 Texas Utilities Electric Company Rate Schedules 52.13 • • , „.„,i4v4kreftZt14-,-/ NOTICE OF RATE DECREASE REQUEST On December 17, 1997, Texas Utilities Electric Company ('TU Electric"), together with the General Counsel of the Public Utility Commission of Texas. the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and various other parties interested in TU Electric's rates and services, filed with the Public Utility Commission of Texas ('Commission") a Stipulation and Joint Application for Approval Thereof and Request for Immediate Interim Rate Reductions ("Stipulation"), which, if granted, would: result in permanent base rate reductions beginning January 1, 1998, of 4% for Residential customers, 2% for General Service Secondary customers, and 1% for all other retail customers; result in an additional permanent base rate reduction beginning January 1, 1999, of 1.4% for Residential customers; impose a cap on TU Electric's earnings during 1998 and 1999, with any sums in excess of such cap being applied as additional depreciation of nuclear production assets; allow the recording of the depreciation applicable to transmission and distribution assets in 1998 and 1999 as additional depreciation of nuclear production assets; establish an updated cost of service study that includes interruptible customers as customer classes; result in the permanent dismissal of pending appeals of prior Commission Orders entered in Dockets Nos. 11735, 12206, 13313, 14716, and 15328, if all other parties that have filed appeals of those dockets also dismiss their appeals; result in all gains from off-system sales of electricity in ciexcess of the amount included in base rates being flowed to customers through the fuel factor; result in a waiver on TU Electric's part of the right to seek certain injunctive relief with respect to the Commission's Project No. 16536; commit TU Electric to extend its current agreement with the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs concerning the Weatherization "Piggyback" Component of the a-Wise Low-Income Demand-Side Management Program; and commit TU Electric to enter into discussions with interested parties concerning issues pertaining to low-income customers. All of TU Electric's customers and classes of customers in all of the territories served by TU Electric will be affected if the Stipulation is granted. Persons who wish to intervene in or comment upon these proceedings should notify the Commission as soon as possible, as an intervention deadline will be imposed. A request to intervene or for further information should be mailed to the Public Utility Commission of Texas, P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. Further information may also be obtained try calling the Public Utility Commission's Office of Consumer Affairs at (512) 936-7120. Hearing- and speech- impaired individuals with text telephones (TTY) may contact the Commission at.(512) 936- 7136. The deadline for intervention in the proceeding is 45 days after the date the application was filed with the Commission. L JM4-27-99 10 . 46 FROM TU REG SUPPORT 22 CRP IC 214 812 3221 PACE 3/3 Cr' MIDLAND REPO RTER•YELEGRAM.WEDNESDAY-DECENBER it.!fe? , t OKElectricb. s rk residentlél r By Melia McEwen Staft Writer Under the agreement, TU The Texas Public Utility Commission Electric Will: Rave TU Electric customers a belated Christmas gift Tuesday,giving interim I reduce its residential approval for a rollback of the utility's base rates 4 percent next rates. • Under the agreement.TU Electric will err e` active with all L reduce its residential base rates 4 per. billings on or after Jan. 1, cent next year,effective with all billings on or after Jan. 1. me agreement also 1 ; calls for residential rates to be towered ■ decrease residential rates an additional 1.4 percent in 1999. an additional 1.4 percent LuAnn Morgan, TU Electric general manager in Midland,estimated that the In 1999; lower rates will save customers S73 I reduce rates for general annually, service secondary The PVC bas.designatedJan.14 as the deadline for parties to intervene and customers—primarily scheduled a pre-hearing conference for small and medium-sized Jan.ls. -. businesses.—2 percent; • TU Elecfrid also will lower rates for general te ylce. secondary customers— 11 and lower rites for other primary s nali and medium-sized busi- retail customers 1 retail custnesses— om 2 percent.ers will be reducates fed I.per•or other — - percent cent. — - The rate rollback, which will cost TI Comers.'the said.'It wasn't required by Electric$263 million over two years, is the PUC. It's something we want to do the result of a joint agreement between because we've reduced operating costs • the utility, the PVC staff, the Office of so much." and Public as y Coun , s er groups The agreement also establishes a cap _Ms. Morgan said that her company en esTTJ aEbove earnings,using way rev- was able to agreep Y enues above that cap to further reduce to the rate reduction the utility's investments in powerplants. because the utility's operating costs including the Comanche Peak nuclear have been reduced through recent cost- power plant, and other facilities. The cutting measures. utility also will use transmission and dis- 'We're able to pass those savings on tribution depreciation for 199$and 1999 Jo our customers and we feel this is —estimated at$33S million—to further Cow something that will be good for our cus- reduce its investments in those facilities, City of Southiake, Texas MEMORANDUM January 30, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Timarron Village "H", Phase 1 Developer Agreement BACKGROUND: The draft Developer Agreement for Village "H", Phase 1, which is part of the Timarron P.U.D. is attached. The usual conditions for the cash escrow, letters of credit, performance bond or payment bond are required in this agreement. There are only two items to be addres sed in more details in this agreement that needs City Council's attention and these changes are as follows: • OFF-SITE WATER, Section IV, Subsection B, page 10A-12 (tisof The Developer will be installinga 12-inch water line along Continental Boulevard along the P frontage of this project. The City will reimburse the Developer for the cost in excess of an 8" line in accordance with our standard oversizing practices. • PARK FEES, Section IV, Subsection C, page 10A-12 The new (7/1/97) Park Dedication requirements state that a Developer must dedicate park land for each area to be platted at the rate of 1 acre for every 40 residential lots. This would require a dedication for this project of 0.875 acres. The previous Park Dedication requirements allowed the Developer the option of either land or fees in lieu of land ($1,000 per lot). The current requirements stated that if the Developer desires to do anything other than dedicate land, they must get a recommendation from the Par k and Recreation Board. This Developer will be meeting with the Park Board on February 9, 1998, in order to discuss fees or credits; however, the Developer will dedicate the required land if so required by City Council as recommended by the Park Board. The Developer has requested that this agreement be considered at this time due to the timing of the next Park Board Meeting and the desire to begin work while the weather cooperates. The agreement to dedicate the required land affords the City all the protections of the City's Park Dedication requirements. 10A-1 (kire MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK TIMARRON VILLAGE "H", PHASE 1 JANUARY 30, 1998 PAGE 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff's recommendation is to place the Timarron Village "H", Phase 1, Developer Agreement on the Regular City Council Meeting Agenda for February 3, 1998, for City Council consideration. attachments: Developer Agreement Plat Exhibit M:\WP-FIlFS\SUBDW T1MARRONW1LL-MDA-MEM.WPD L L 10A-2 �..,. TIMARRON,VILLAGE H,PHASE 1` DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 01/30/98 An Agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," of Timarron,Village H,Phase 1,hereinafter referred to as the"Addition," to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the 35 lots contained within the Timarron,'Village H, Phase 1 Addition and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. Since the Developer is prepared to develop the Addition as rapidly as possible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residential building activity begin as quickly as possible and the City is desirous of having the subdivision completed `�-- as rapidly as possible, the City agrees to release 10% of the lots, eight (8), after installation of the water and sewer mains. Framing shall not commence until water quality is approved by the City and all appropriate Fire Code requirements are satisfied,and street signs with street names are in place.Temporary all-weather metal signs securely fastened in the ground are acceptable until permanent street signs are installed. The Developer recognizes that the remaining building permits or Certificates of Occupancy for residential dwellings will not be issued until the supporting public works infrastructure including permanent street signs with block numbers and regulatory signs within the Addition have been accepted by the City. This will serve as an incentive to the Developer to see that all remaining items are completed. C. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, letters of credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts,up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2)years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. 10A-3 The value of the performance bond, letters of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Each request for reduction or payment of escrow funds must be accompanied by lien release(s) executed by all subcontractors and/or suppliers prior to the release of escrow funds or reduction in value of the account. Performance and payment bond, letters of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City,hereinafter referred to as Contractor,will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. D. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% of the construction cost for paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2)years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds,letters of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. If the Developer chooses to construct bar ditches in lieu of curb and gutter, and the City approves the design and grade of bar ditches,Developer understands and agrees to provide maintenance on the bar ditches for a period of two years from the date of acceptance of the Addition. Maintenance includes trash and debris cleanup,mowing, `�-- and erosion control. E. Until the performance and payment bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow required in Paragraph C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the Addition shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said Addition by Developer, save and except as provided above. F. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly authorized representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgment that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. 10A-4 G. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent(2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities,on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. H. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses,hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen(15) days 10A-5 written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Should such cost remain unpaid for 120 days after notice, the City can file a lien on such property so maintained. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. J. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further,the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements,the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers,released by the City Engineer, and made part of the final`plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development 10A-6 proposals are being presented for approval by the City. The Developer hereby agrees to comply with all provisions of the Texas Water Code. C. LAW COMPLIANCE: Developer hereby agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws that are applicable to development of this Addition. D. STREETS: 1. The street construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217. Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a)Installation and two year operation cost of street lights,which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition;b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type,size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by the Director of Public Works.It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features,however,should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer hereby agrees to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified 10A-7 and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a *41.'"" manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. E. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. F. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When, in the opinion of the Director of Public Works, there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been �... given to the Developer,the Developer will have seventy-two (72)hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the Developer's expense. All expenses must be paid to the City prior to acceptance of the Addition. G. AMENITIES: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes,unique landscaping,walls,and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture,pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. H. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping,irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to 10A-8 maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer and his successors and assigns understand that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the streets, and the water, sewer, or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. 4. Developer's Agreement executed. 5. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance,naming the City as co-insured,prior to commencement of any work. 6. A pre-construction meeting between Developer and City is required. Developer or contractor shall furnish to the City a list of all subcontractors and suppliers, which will be providing greater than a $1,000 value to the Addition. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, 10A-9 WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE,OCCUPANCY,USE,EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES, OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES,CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the • Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection,the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them,on account thereof,to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgement which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection herewith. 10A-10 D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager,which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract,the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense;provided,however, that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. G. The City is an exempt organization under Section 151,309, Tax Code, and the facilities constructed under this Agreement will be dedicated to public use and accepted by the City upon acknowledgment by the City of completion under • Paragraph I.F. 1. The purchase of tangible personal property, other than machinery or equipment and its accessories, repair, and replacement parts, for use in the performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151, Tax code, if the tangible property is: a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement; and b. completely consumed at the job site. 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. - the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. H. Prior to final acceptance of this phase the Developer shall provide to the city 3 copies of Record Drawings of this phase, showing the facilities as actually constructed. 10A-11 Such drawings will be stamped and signed by a registered professional civil engineer. In addition the Developer shall provide electronic files showing the plan and profile of the sanitary sewer, storm drain, roadway and waterline; all lot lines; and tie in to the state Plane Coordinate System. IV. OTHER ISSUES: A. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: (Not Applicable) B. OFF-SITE WATER The Developer agrees to install a 12" water line along the project frontage of Continental Boulevard. The City will reimburse the Developer for the cost in excess of that of an 8" line. C. PARK FEES: The developer agrees to pay the Park Fee of$500 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 7.0. There arc approximately acres in which would bring the total cost of Park Fcc to $ . The Developer agrees to abide by the Park Dedication requirements as shown in the Subdivision Ordinance. (The Developer will be meeting with the Park Board to discuss fees in lieu of dedication or credits for previously dedicated property. The Developer agrees to return to the City Council once the Park Board has developed its recommendation. At that time, the Developer will request an amended Developer Agreement addressing the Park Board,recommendation:), D. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585. 10A-12 SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Address Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: 10A-13 REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit(L of C) must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%)percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. M:•WP-FILES.SUBDMTIMARROMVILL-H\DEV-AGR WPD 10A-14 1-30-1998 3:SOPM FROM SOUTF-LAKE COM DEy 817488937O 2. I :'H - H 39V N I V N 8Vr1I IY1-{ IVNN-1 ,i1 f Z Y jZ [ 7 r Pa [�•pI Ga ,,! ilro ji'1C m`it j' ( t. r ; :F.,„ t l . 1 y�[ a , ......7 Y :l2 ::. =S t i II ; o f S e 1 r S C: t I 154 1 4i• ; 1 .' ; t% it a3 ! i._>i Yt Ti 3 f i } I 3 i 1 i =1 { �Ii t i•y•ii i 51 N 'iri1 1 it 3 � " ` " {!' I'1' ' [`. : -it i i , t i : f ; i , P:; `IV lyt ` -. fir• p i § gT i �i S ! 1 i I I i 1 ;! ` } sr ' `I1 'A ; 11• T; ...,71-0T • r iiIi ;I . ' j 1 t; - e t •,1,,,v i v i..) i 411 I 1--il k-_, •‘..e k •-c.4 is r-! ." ‘, /-r "., .10iNa 1 ... ill i !iiii! liS5 il!kOl'i p4 L !.-;:-....:' 41 0 P4 ; egr ..4131Nakilg. :,teB:-1-1;1 . tIgg.,;ti-iatl '..hill I' I•Qlliiil F f r.>3 •5• t . -.�V \�lN...�.�yY I ii: /� : l`y if % .: Ill J •�It tl !;:lit h :ttllfl 11 t >E , i. �.i ..mtv.:'i. •a i1 1 r /'• !\/ ,�•__ a[ I. 14. iy i it I' � I i•�.'•i� LFT rrr iia TT ! ,! �,_ , `' • ,\. i r h. :i>iitiiii.s �' c: t j A / _^ 1-(1 111i11111Wt ..• 1` „is e;3• ' . .\!' }x,• '�y� --' ( i 3 Iuml .::,.- .act.-:- . . i. r& 1•i;"1[ • i5' _ • _ pi I 11111111111MU I 1 .. 5. . i I •iHti .. • f 1� . - 7"' I • its ;� - av . !ti j : i:i ia..•rc: ..,1, , .la‘f,0 ...„lz:, 1,::, :,-...t. .....„...,..::.47., „... i —r 4:" .-iiiii*._101-Wrmiikelist,..ko. f7. : ,,4_,:____L__4 ; ., .•• I., i it •--__€_{�.. ? „}-- -;tt'r y — - .:�------1-_..�_•.r..- i l t - ! r 1. ,.-. �•:. t -"`..._•' T' 1 # is i. 1 , -T , .. , ,. , . '1• N ,4 lim s 1 • .: E� 3 ;L•. ;' 'I r pi kolow, I •s,. ,01 f- i City of Southlake,Texas (600, MEMORANDUM January 29, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Progress Report on Council's Prioritization Schedule Attached you will find a copy of the latest"Prioritization Schedule"as formally adopted by Council on March 18, 1997. Recall that we sent a"rankings"form to all Councilmembers and asked them to prioritize several items. The results of this exercise were compiled into the attached format and approved by City Council. At the Director's meeting we discussed the fact that we felt it would be a good idea to update City Council on the status of various projects in accordance with their formal prioritization. This "Progress Report"should summarize(in brief detail)the current status of all the ranked projects as well as several projects that were never formally ranked but have been pursued due to other direction by City Council. Also attached is the current scheduled projects for the Community Development Department as well as a summary of the"Workgroups"programmed to pursue individual projects. Many of these have been meeting and progressing on their selected topics. This Progress Report represents feedback from all directors. Feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Any questions pertaining to individual projects would best be discussed with the Director in charge of the project. GL/gl enc. Council Prioritization Schedule -Progress Report dated January 28, 1998 Community Development Department- Scheduled priorities as of January 29, 1998 Summary of Workgroups dated January 29, 1998 cc: FYI to Planning and Zoning Commissioners L."; L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PRI-4MEM.WPD Progress Report: January 29, 1998 Priority COUNCIL PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE -Approved March 18, 1997 Highest Lowest 1 2 3 4 5 Dept. Item Rank Score 4 CD plate nl"tlwAfiasterThproitlo.e l.'. srrtr ............... 1 1.00 5 CD pdaEte��e I�taste>�,L�acl LTsePlan 9 l�at'k,��sst 1 I�9•� 1 1.00 4 1 PW Drainage Master Plan(Phase 195%, Work Session Pending) 2 1.20 4 1 PW Franchise Utility Placement Ordinance(20%) 2 1.20 3 1 plate eat•he Parrs Reetogxon atsd t;7pen Space MasterPlan(pQni} 3 1.25 4 2 CD Ze ::Oidinanee ii1'ele o itrilcafton Tow r&: nt s: Do iQ >::: 4 1.67 3 2 1 PW Street Standards Ordinance(Ord.217)(To begin 1/20/98) 4 1.67 ......................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 PR �>:: ... t ::;.: :; . ;;. ::� es::.:a :::: n�::>::>::>::>::>::;::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::::::>::;::::;::<>:>:>::>;><>::::;::»;:<:»:>:: 5 1.75 ......................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................................... .................... ................................................................................................................................. 2 1 1 PS 800 MHZ System (Pending tower site finalization) 5 1.75 2 1 1 CMO Citywide Strategic Plan(50%) 5 1.75 2 2 1 PW Utility Policies&Standards Ord(Revise Ord. 170)(To Begin 1/20/98) 6 1.80 ,,, 4 1 1 CD Zoning Ord.-Outside Storage Issues(20%-Research Complete) 7 1.83 2 2 2 CD Amortization of Certain Non-Conforming Uses(5%) 8 2.00 2 2 2 PR/CD :.:::::XiiiiiiiiiiiftiiPiiieri.at4ittiiiiiSiefieiiiWigitbdiiiiiiftgtitittYtkMijpMiM 8 2.00 2 8 2.00 2 PR 3 2 1 CD Lighting Standards(75%if we adopt Plano-based ordinance) 8 2.00 3 1 1 1 CD Zoning Ord.-Impervious Coverage(90%-Attorney reviewing) 9 2.17 3 2 1 CD : 10 2.33 >��';�e�'1 >E�ra�t :' wee: s�o .....:...:... .:...:..:......:::.::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.:::: 2 1 1 1 CD Zoning Ord.480-V(Misc.Revisions)(95%awaiting WG input) 11 2.40 2 1 2 1 PR/CD Vv _ 0::> 12 2.50 2 1 1 PW Electrical Code Regional Update(Ord.No.620)(to CC on 2-3-98) 12 2.50 2 1 2 1 PW Sign Ordinance Revisions(5%) 12 2.50 2 1 1 PS Emergency Preparedness Plan(85%) 12 2.50 3 1 2 CD Residential Adjacent Ord.(Nbhd Preserv.)(80%-Attorney reviewing) 12 2.50 2 2 1 PW Uniform Housing Code Update(Ordinance 214)(to CC on 2-3-98) 13 2.60 1 1 1 CD i.Subc iv. z :Or :Bevis :<:=i: :.:at ::::..:...:...... a Rk ences(D::.:e;>:::>:: 14 2.67 '\.•.- 2 1 1 1 1 PW Commercial Dumpster Ordinance(80%) 14 2.67 1 1 2 1 PW Substandard Building Code(Ordinance 615)(to CC on 2-3-98) 15 2.80 L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIOPJTY\PRI-RNK3.WPD Page 1 of 2 Progress Report-January 29,1998(4:16pm) I I B-Z Priority COUNCIL PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE - Approved March 18, 1997 Highest--------Lowest 1 2 3 4 5 Dept. Item Rank Score 1 2 3 PS Update Noise Control Ordinance No.484(20%) 16 2.83 ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 2 CMO pi'dtti0ii�:0ociil4ati0it:v!'itirtiigisit:a�Fii.:...;;tt' ' 17 3.00 1 2 1 CS Health and Sanitation Ordinance 17 3.00 1 3 1 CD Zoning Ordinance-Front Yard issues(10%Research complete) 18 3.50 2 2 1 PW Septic Ordinance(30%) 19 3.80 1 1 2 CMO Open Records Ordinance 20 4.25 4 PS 21 5.00 Legend:PW=Public Works,CD=Community Development,PR=Parks,CMO=City Manager's Office, CS=City Secretary,PS=Public Safety,HR=Human Resources,WG=Workgroup Dept. The Following Items Were Not Prioritized by Council but Have Been Completed based on Council's Direction Cu >:'z4initt flrila*ce... CD D C 'ii::isi::•ii::iiiiii: ::::::::i:: ::::iiii:isi::i?i::iii}iii}iiiii:::isi::iiiii::iJi::::iiiiiiiiiiiiiiifi:::fiiiiii:::ii?iiii:!:iiiiiiiiiiiii:�i::i:?iii::i::i::i:::::i::iti::':::•:'i:;i$j :;:i::�?.i'::::.:i :.::.:.. :.:.::.:......:.:.:':: .i'::...:.:... :::.: ::::.:i':i:�. ..:_....:.:..:....�.:..:.:i':::.:.:. .::::.. :•:v::...:: .. iiiiiiiTiiiiii::.iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:ii:: CD :::>C .;:::l aced: zon of sele d:tra ::->:Fi ::t ::w > r:oc . :.:tbuc::wet ::withdraw xr�:.;:::::>::>::>::>giii.:iiiii::>::»::::::>::»::>::>::: PS/CM tt 1 : <omit wmtV ated(n ' >>brim Qatr�sc�C�� 1.3� ..� �� .::.�::::::::::: :.::.::::::::..::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.:;.................. .. ..::.:.....:.:..:..:................. CM/HR eve' � �'<>>>>`<>:<<<><a< > >> >�� >»?« `�`><'�' »» � >'< :.>`'':�>'> �»><'<'»>? <�:< �`�>��> « <``>` ': ;CriiYrital�isft� :`jai'::.�..:.:..ln.�:. i ::::: : .:..:.:.:......................................................:...........:.:.........:..:. :.:::::::::::::::.. CMu CMO HR HR ........................ Seals................................................... . ....................:....................................:.:::.::�:::::::::.:::.::.:::::::.:�.�.�::::::.�::::.:::::.:::::.:...................................:.. .............. ........... ................T..�:N..':.. .�.y...�}.gyp ...._:.. .. .... ...........�.. ............ HR HR Dept. The Following Items Were Not Prioritized by Council but are in Progress based on Council's Direction CD SOB-Sexually Oriented Business Regulations(Draft being prepared by FBT) PR Bob Jones Park Ph.I Construction PR Bicentennial Park Expansion Ph.II Design CMO Renovation of Eubanks House for Senior Center L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\PRIORITY\PRI-RNK7.WPD Page 2 of 2 Progress Report-January 29, 1998(4:16pm) Ite-3 N ..]' .t • 0 a o by 20. r U U... 3 . : ::>. Cr? N a ::.;::::.. ::.:::::.. :::.::«::.. .. :.::: ........ .......;<. a. fa. eA U :::::::::::::: U Y ii 3_ : N Ci i;i%?sii:i it,:,_f,.i N ° F. U 6 � o : ', a Cie II u� v o F U U 3 3 g y 4 NI "�r ::::;; U N vi z «!:: U 0 U iL ef II w .::. ..: a N a I�... aPi- 3 3 a. ......:E i::.. :. N N II it o . w.... .... :... . a ait . it U U II II L O QI ::>i t:Ey U U u i:;ii:% I 3 II II II Q :::::::::. ::::��[::: II o0 o d..:...... .......... ~ : 1i::' 6 IIil II II ii ,0o n :. 7 II II ii N i• L i.� L Ir in L. Lr it t� it L i..� L Q 2 a > a > a > n. > n. i a. > a > a > a > a > a > a > a. > Cl. > CO U a a) a a) a a) a ao a a) a a.) a a) a a) a a7 a N a a.) a a) a N a a) N s Q c4 < Q c4 Q cd Q c4 Q a d c4 Q c4 Q a Q c4 Q c4 Q c4 Q a Q c4 . m E : I 0 o 0 /CC� v� a Y ti ty :[:; a Ca q A C> `l m Q 60 o = aU oD E 4t n, 7 0 U .. b0 O O'. 7i•.•.11 ❑ O\ y U ... O of O C ^ D\ •� .....,E Li 0 ::::3 p, .N C. av'+ O LL. C CO a IV C4 Q .. Q u a a� -0 4< Co U .� c: o 5 t. O C c• ) 'O `,, U 5 y' A C. O y ti, • C O rr . C .� 0 !j O g 'X 0 O > C.) c a ^:: L L L Q .= L L C Q:.. fl _ O L L e{ O 0 0 pp - . C Q C g [IDA O �J'' E -T. y� O U X .'24 e'n E 'd E P. n % V N N , 0 ,) 0 N O N • ¢ 3 U ' n::: .,:,>: l� O .• OMOOOiii7.,..,11,,,I,. cY::i :::;i: N N Z.•` i N N ... N M N Cl '!t U c.) c.l a U U a U U U U }y o0 v, C.- CV en CI, en.. . ................ I ( 8-q T C a C :i;41:s3 s::iii::>iii ::•::.i *:.MMMMM C) :::.:: c ,.:=f,: A^:: d) •::::T:::: • 7ii r L 3,r':' > _c cc: ca E :: .: C C C C C C y C C C C iI O O O O O O O O 0 O "t :: col C C., C •c c • C. cccc Q*r +Z::: •c c c O- • 7 ° dt;::: o 0 0 C o C La o C 0 0 .>. -- x ` 3�:. U U U U U U w U U U U > c7 ;i:>. >, >, >, >, >, >, o >, >,-, >, > C q > : C) C) C) C) C) C) O ) C) ) 6::: • > > > > > > .. > > > > j.> y ms C E�'' OO O O O O -) L . C. C. a C. R. F. . 6 :::c�:::: < < < < < < i:. d d < d z: l.z:> U c. 0 :.):: :::i::4x:»: Q e c tsr V C' Q Licn C ` d fL o :: N 3 Nww :: U CO _' O COD U 3:ir> tu A ° es a op eu el, > = a :..: • a o q °_' u Cj • ono ::>::: t»> W x fif v o cca a ..S.: E s h v y >> Z o w :GS::>: o a) c .0 4 '"� o o u >C 3 c H c �. N O U ::'C:: .7 �-' 1 N , r� i t CJ .D 'O O) O CO cd .ii;f,.;.!!ii;i` C �. O > 000 a0 Q os�. c Q , o b `o o oo o o o oe L co > > yo L eu • ar 0 b — 3 _ _ O •C) N o' o z o o 9 o a) o U N N VD v) V, N. N. H. V) . N N . o o d N O t. :::::: O o 1 f M o Z. �... . �O O �O M v-) � �' O.. 7 Lz. C q lc:, q q Ca 0 z f� In Ca u' Cl 0 `a — y U U U U U U U U U U U i:.` is C�' 0U C it C) d "" N — M r- - r--1 ° - CC d �^ — ono r` 4-, 00 00 v — o M _ M N ,n N 7 N 7 0 00 # 00 a.) — a.) c O '- O O cn V) C6.I.) ydj ^c 8 c• Q t 1 O E a) 7 O Q ¢ x ¢ m CC o � c, o ov C a, v o o, o, 0 c — = 'o — O z rn c, M M M O 00 00 C 00 ^ 00 00 N H 00 00 OO 00 00 00 00 _! .� .1. 7 7 V ,7 ' 7 "cr 00 U ON CO = c c c c _ O O O O 0 .0 U CO O D O O o 0 O OD 1.) SOA W to E 00 G. L- °) W E" 7 • a) W W c._..) • U U U R en = ate) 00• = _ = ate) ate) Z C Q -1 Q ¢ Q C C C • CC vi 3 3 3 3 3 3 ,c tri sc C • ^ co N -CO' ^ — — — LMt n = -1- 7 r co 7 N co cc7 WJ G 7 7 V 7 .0- 7 f. U .m1 T CU cc >, c Y ..,cN • Y C U1 4 V] 7 7 0 7 G, E �_'. _ >, >' I^- E O E V •— Ci — 2 02 G G .. -' U Ct •~ -r V V M .� V'1 ..1- v� 7 N `7 M .0 c, 7 vn M h h r- h r- ^ r t` c-- o0 r- h n 00 [� [� h t� it p — X X XX XX X X X XX X X XX X X X X O t] co co • '" 0`4 `o ., 7 too . .0 'M C y Y c cs � T T >. E E 0C >. >"' >. >. >.C - >+ Oy W •o •O 7 O O L •C C •o •a -o d '0 'O E - q (n C C c O -a O O cd R x R E 3d. C7 C7 C7 C7 E5 `d 0 C7 o 0 C7 0 j u.i 0 T•v F c c --1 c Y 3 Y --� c c 3 c c c ,,, N c a) F V V on V = 00 w V V V a) • •� a) V — c `00 .n .- 2 00 .E a ro s c ti :1 C7 :1 Uo. UC7v, :1F- 5C :1 :1U U5CC (.7 -E U c G y O A 0 0 En _ C tf O OD C. a) -- O = Z c o. c c ,,, 3 CC 0..— 'O o V V M C C ,n E F•. C d C E u a) U u a) O ` O o 0,0 c Lu 1C V C M 00 H 00 V ) 00 0 s. C7 = o v C c > M v _ a) C a) s U a) CA J v U c v °'� 2i a H C U = ti "O coo a) o ° 000 '�•. 2 0 a) c 'En T co O ["' oo )o to 00 H v v a) v �, y = v c a . v .5 C .E �, • O0 OD O▪ = 0 ,6. .0 oA o 0 c Q 0 O - 0 0 N 0 1.. 00 E R OD a) O0 c> C OD O V to 0D C a) C CDJ Co V. a, u C A C — s - O c n on c c g c1 0 0 ° q 'c ^ > 'c 'c ai V an 'E '> o 'c 'c a c c f O 0 0 `0 0 > v o a) 0 0 a`3 0 E 0 0 N UU N < NO :. -] cn NC' cn N N : UZ < Z .j V 0 �n ro M C_ ra co tV rn rn m m r_ CT) CU Z) L I Cz LO Q Ln CU 0 o h SITE DATA SUMMA RY CHA RT EXISTING ZONING NON-RESIDENTIAL PUD NUMBER OF LOTS ONE GROSS AND NET ACREAGE 2.689 AC. (117,133 S F ) PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE 30.8% EXISTING OPEN SPACE AREA 2689 AC- (177,133 S.F ) PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AREA 0.799 AC. (34.806 S.F.) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED OPEN SPACE 30.8% AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE NONE OFF-STREET LOADING SUMMARY TOTAL EXISTING LOADING SPACES 4 1 TOTAL REQUIRED LOADING SPACES 4 CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING CHORD CIO 03116 19 3839.72 219.27 N 38'10 125 W 219.24 C11 00.45 22 3869.72 51.07 N 41.18 46 W 1 51.07 PARKING SUMMARY CHART TOTAL EXISTING GARAGE SPACES 681 TOTAL EXISTING SURFACE SPACES 543 TOTAL EXISTING PARKING SPACES 1224 TOTAL PROPOSED SURFACE SPACES 104 TOTAL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SURFACE SPACES 647 TOTAL EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING SPACES 1328 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 1328 TOTAL N0. OF EXIST. H.C. SPACES 30 UM TABLE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE L10 S 53'27 45 W 28.26 L11 N 36*3215 W 156.32 L12 N 18'45 03 W 81.41 L13 N 89'28 00 W 25.00 era ��'� `\ t \�:'' r• � %� X/! •\�•` � ;�,, ~ ti \ � i ti T FWE DESCRIPTION TABLE NO, TREE DESCRIPTION NORTHING FASTING 326 5 X 15 WALLOW 51083.67603 49648.57305 357 3 X 6 WILLOW 50971.05038 49646. 1809 360 7 X 12 WILLOW 51082.26335 49644.36859 363 3 X 12 OAK 5114 ,01 77 4 7 4. 4 364 2 X 12 OAK 51151.44579 49685,58785 366 12 CEDAR 51144.34232 49657.37276 367 36 OAK 51150.361 49661.39815 379 3 X 4 WILLOW 51004.42975 49576.33033 384 2 X 12 OAK 385 2 X 10 OAK 50998.60650 49493.15611 409 21 WILLOW 51032.19803 49517.68164 415 3 X 12 WILLOW 51072.66334 49528.13076 420 18 OAK 51209.70146 4 6 9-0 290 437 12 HACKBERRY 5120.06665 49710.27372 438 8 ASH 51 16 7114 49709.50935 441 3 X 6 ASH 51188,79540 4 7 488 1 OAK 51269.0736 489 18 OAK 512151.59319 4957 0120 491 15 ASH 51270 90467 49559.77230 495 18 OAK 51242 04933 49567.88817 496 8 CEDAR 51233.51003 49570.38738 498 6 CEDAR 51223.02910 49580.62690 499 12 OAK 512H.02675 49 6.11481 503 12 OAK 51229.78399 49509.02838 504 2 X 6 CEDAR 9 127 S. 6 6 7 49 1. 141 505 8 CEDAR 51232.75790 49500.71807 516 15 OAK 511.4. 0 2 4944 .34604 518 15 OAK 51194.41306 49430 97134 519 4 X 4 OAK 51186.42815 49427 79963 521 8 OAK 51182,18351 49419-80558 522 12 OAK 51185.1515,68 49414.65777 557 12 ELM 5125483374 4950. i 559 12 ELM 51283.29376 49573.50771 560 4 CEDAR 51284.72775 49576.70975 566 12 ELN 567 12 ELM 51362.63798 49682 45895 568 10 HACKBERRY 51369,03440 4 t 5 1 571 10 HACKBE RY 517,74895 49691.9 496 572 10 HACKSERRY 51386.51042 49696.96603 573 10 HACKBERRY 51390.62967 49695.81642 574 8 HACKBERRY 51 96.19911 49698.89330 5 5 8 HACKKRRY 5140039997 49700 549. 3 5 12 HACKBERRY 51410,28339 49716.23210 582 1 15 HACK ERRY 514M,83186 49749.33203 583 1 12HACKBERRY 1 51435 308 3 49735.29231 585 1 18 HACKBERRY 1 51423.32546 1 49739.57563 i 4 I � TE S I ♦ ' %� r rJ, / l /* o \ ti .� --. h -` , `� `�� f % / ��-LOADING-SPACES Ile � raw � ,• � N � •. hij . r • \\ �. �L \ -l" GRE LANDSCAPE 197 AD 0. CNN `1 _ s- ..-- - - 0 • yet•` �. �> � �' � r % -� `'' i- .- ` '"" "-r''� . _ '��/ ' /•-- '� y ww ...,.., «. _... �.- .__► ,-.. ,....._..._., ..- ...• ..+ _ _ . _- `_ ' ' _ - _ _ „ ^ _ ....,...-. ..•....Qr\ � � -_ _ ., - N0 DISTURBANCE AREA POINT Of BEPINNINGNow C11.71 rC1 0` 50' `PUBUIC \ O STATE OF TEXAS- -' VO[ , 10474, Pr, 386 4!� - 4 STATE HIGHWAY NO, 114 D.R.T.C.T. d 1,J _)'C,'` Q _ `Q410y { lx \, C9S, \ yLAJ 01 L13 Q i T x F< cw SITE Ar VICINITY MAP N.T.S. LOT/2 NORTH act �► rw � LOCATION MAP N.T.S. LEGEND $ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT POINT OF INGRESSAGRESS A66 CONTROL POINT o LP EXISTING LIGHT POLE *LP PROPOSED UGHT POLE a TELEPHONE RISER M TELEPHONE VAULT FIRE HYD. 0 WATER VALVE WATER VAULT Qs SANITARY SEWER M.H. Coo SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT Q STORM SEWER M.H. -o POWERPOLE ELETRIC M.H. ® SPRINKLER BOX 1 S1GN o GUARD POST LIGHT POST GUARD RAILS - E - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SHAMROCK BURIED HIGH DSODIAMOND PRESSURE PETROLEUM PIPELINE MARKER LSG O LOSE STAR GAS PIPELINE MARKER TRA O TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PIPELINE MARKER TELEPHONE CABLE MARKER EX -TREE 588 EX-CONT-NML 600 EX-CONT-HGH r-�- PROP-CONT-MNL --ED- PROP-CONT-HGH TREE SURVEY THE SABRE GROUP PARKING LOT IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 19, 1998 Prepared By. HUI Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Engineering/Architecture 3131 McKinney Ave. Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75204 Phone (214) 871-3311 Fax (214) 871-0757 Prepared For. MAGUIRE PARTNERS Nine Village Circle Suite 500 Southlake, Texas 76262 (817) 430-0303 '7 i RECD JA N 3 01998 I 0 Ln L r0 0 N ao rn M 0 0 0 Cn CU C_ LL_ rz Y d 0 C_ Ln L0 0 r` N_ O n SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART EXISTING ZONING NON—RESIDENTIAL P.U.D.: CS, 0-2, C-3 AND H.C. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE MIXED USE NUMBER OF LOTS ONE GROSS AND NET ACREAGE 2.689 AC. (GROSS) 2.391 AC.(NET) PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE 0% (NO BUILDING PROPOSED) EXISTING OPEN SPACE AREA 2.391 AC (NET) CHART r V ,/ \ PARKING SUMMARY TOTAL EXISTING GARAGE SPACES 681 TOTAL EXISTING SURFACE SPACES 543 TOTAL EXISTING PARKING SPACES 1224 TOTAL PROPOSED SURFACE SPACES 105 TOTAL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SURFACE SPACES 648 TOTAL EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING SPACES 1329 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 1328 TOTAL NO. OF EXIST. H.C. SPACES 30 OFF-STREET LOADI TOTAL EXISTING LOADING SPACES 4 TOTAL REQUIRED LOADING SPACES it CURVE, TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING CHORD C10 03'16 19" 3839.72' 219 27 ]—N 38'10'25 W 219.24 C11 00'45'22 3869.72' 1 51.07' 1 N 41'18'46" W 51.07' s SITE Ole OOnCN T ti Dove VICINITY MAP N.T.S. NG SUMMARY - Wit. -•` � � `s \�- �, i '%� \ '',� � J LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE L10 S 53'27 45" W 28.26' L11 N 36*3215' W 156.32' L12 N 18'45'03" W 81.41' L13 I N 89'28'00" W 1 25.00 NOTE: EXISTING TREES BEING DISPLACED BY NEW PARKING AREA TO BE TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN NEW PARKING AREA AND T.W. KING - ;-`� �? Q �4 TO SCREEN NEW PARKING AREA. �' 30' BUILDING LINE > �,�_ i Y—Vol. 388/211, PG. 68 do 69 / i% p� 2—LOADING SPACEScp �ti► / � X/ / / ---_4 i 25' PEDESTRAIN ACCESS EASEMENT A '� — -- Vol. 9437, PG. 1127 D.R.T.C.T. Vol. 2487, PG. 210 D.R.D.C.T. r , LEGEND o'�� / t. + EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT Ci ; `A POINT OF INGRESS/EGRESS Z. 066 CONTROL POINT o LP EXISTING LIGHT POLE / *LP PROPOSED LIGHT POLE EX. SIDEWALK / / / / ® TELEPHONE RISER TELEPHONE VAULT O FIRE HYD. NOTES: 8l 1. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT CURRENTLY PLATTED, HOWEVER / = •_'. �� ' -., � / I / � / A SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR PLATTING IS BEING PROCESSED WITH THE CITY CONCURRENT WITH THIS APPUCATION. 2. THIS APPLICATION REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM THE DRIVEWAY STACKING DEPTH FROM 75' TO 20'. \ / / 3. NO FENCING, WALLS OR SCREENING IS REQUIRED. kCES CHAIRMAN DATE MAYOR DATE _ PLANNING & ZONNING COMISSION CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 1 SITE PLAN THE SABRE GROUP PARKING LOT LOT/2 L , NORM PROJECT r w. 'mac S.y z LOCATION MAP N.T.S. 0 30 60 90 120 1 "=60' STATE OF TEXAS VOL. 10474, PG. 386 D.R. T.C. T. STATE HIGHWAY N0. 114 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 19, 1998 REVISED JANUARY 23, 1998 Prepared By. Prepared For: HU1TT-2DLLA,RS MAGUIRE PARTNERS Huitt—Zollars, Inc. Engineering/Architecture Nine Village Circle 3131 McKinney Ave. Suite 600 Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75204 Southloke, Texas 76262 Phone (214) 871-3311 (817) 430-0303 Fax (214) 871-0757 ZA97-176 OFF-STREET LOADI TOTAL EXISTING LOADING SPACES 4 TOTAL REQUIRED LOADING SPACES it CURVE, TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING CHORD C10 03'16 19" 3839.72' 219 27 ]—N 38'10'25 W 219.24 C11 00'45'22 3869.72' 1 51.07' 1 N 41'18'46" W 51.07' s SITE Ole OOnCN T ti Dove VICINITY MAP N.T.S. NG SUMMARY - Wit. -•` � � `s \�- �, i '%� \ '',� � J LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE L10 S 53'27 45" W 28.26' L11 N 36*3215' W 156.32' L12 N 18'45'03" W 81.41' L13 I N 89'28'00" W 1 25.00 NOTE: EXISTING TREES BEING DISPLACED BY NEW PARKING AREA TO BE TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN NEW PARKING AREA AND T.W. KING - ;-`� �? Q �4 TO SCREEN NEW PARKING AREA. �' 30' BUILDING LINE > �,�_ i Y—Vol. 388/211, PG. 68 do 69 / i% p� 2—LOADING SPACEScp �ti► / � X/ / / ---_4 i 25' PEDESTRAIN ACCESS EASEMENT A '� — -- Vol. 9437, PG. 1127 D.R.T.C.T. Vol. 2487, PG. 210 D.R.D.C.T. r , LEGEND o'�� / t. + EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT Ci ; `A POINT OF INGRESS/EGRESS Z. 066 CONTROL POINT o LP EXISTING LIGHT POLE / *LP PROPOSED LIGHT POLE EX. SIDEWALK / / / / ® TELEPHONE RISER TELEPHONE VAULT O FIRE HYD. NOTES: 8l 1. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT CURRENTLY PLATTED, HOWEVER / = •_'. �� ' -., � / I / � / A SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR PLATTING IS BEING PROCESSED WITH THE CITY CONCURRENT WITH THIS APPUCATION. 2. THIS APPLICATION REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM THE DRIVEWAY STACKING DEPTH FROM 75' TO 20'. \ / / 3. NO FENCING, WALLS OR SCREENING IS REQUIRED. kCES CHAIRMAN DATE MAYOR DATE _ PLANNING & ZONNING COMISSION CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 1 SITE PLAN THE SABRE GROUP PARKING LOT LOT/2 L , NORM PROJECT r w. 'mac S.y z LOCATION MAP N.T.S. 0 30 60 90 120 1 "=60' STATE OF TEXAS VOL. 10474, PG. 386 D.R. T.C. T. STATE HIGHWAY N0. 114 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 19, 1998 REVISED JANUARY 23, 1998 Prepared By. Prepared For: HU1TT-2DLLA,RS MAGUIRE PARTNERS Huitt—Zollars, Inc. Engineering/Architecture Nine Village Circle 3131 McKinney Ave. Suite 600 Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75204 Southloke, Texas 76262 Phone (214) 871-3311 (817) 430-0303 Fax (214) 871-0757 ZA97-176 it CURVE, TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH BEARING CHORD C10 03'16 19" 3839.72' 219 27 ]—N 38'10'25 W 219.24 C11 00'45'22 3869.72' 1 51.07' 1 N 41'18'46" W 51.07' s SITE Ole OOnCN T ti Dove VICINITY MAP N.T.S. NG SUMMARY - Wit. -•` � � `s \�- �, i '%� \ '',� � J LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE L10 S 53'27 45" W 28.26' L11 N 36*3215' W 156.32' L12 N 18'45'03" W 81.41' L13 I N 89'28'00" W 1 25.00 NOTE: EXISTING TREES BEING DISPLACED BY NEW PARKING AREA TO BE TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN NEW PARKING AREA AND T.W. KING - ;-`� �? Q �4 TO SCREEN NEW PARKING AREA. �' 30' BUILDING LINE > �,�_ i Y—Vol. 388/211, PG. 68 do 69 / i% p� 2—LOADING SPACEScp �ti► / � X/ / / ---_4 i 25' PEDESTRAIN ACCESS EASEMENT A '� — -- Vol. 9437, PG. 1127 D.R.T.C.T. Vol. 2487, PG. 210 D.R.D.C.T. r , LEGEND o'�� / t. + EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT Ci ; `A POINT OF INGRESS/EGRESS Z. 066 CONTROL POINT o LP EXISTING LIGHT POLE / *LP PROPOSED LIGHT POLE EX. SIDEWALK / / / / ® TELEPHONE RISER TELEPHONE VAULT O FIRE HYD. NOTES: 8l 1. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT CURRENTLY PLATTED, HOWEVER / = •_'. �� ' -., � / I / � / A SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR PLATTING IS BEING PROCESSED WITH THE CITY CONCURRENT WITH THIS APPUCATION. 2. THIS APPLICATION REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM THE DRIVEWAY STACKING DEPTH FROM 75' TO 20'. \ / / 3. NO FENCING, WALLS OR SCREENING IS REQUIRED. kCES CHAIRMAN DATE MAYOR DATE _ PLANNING & ZONNING COMISSION CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 1 SITE PLAN THE SABRE GROUP PARKING LOT LOT/2 L , NORM PROJECT r w. 'mac S.y z LOCATION MAP N.T.S. 0 30 60 90 120 1 "=60' STATE OF TEXAS VOL. 10474, PG. 386 D.R. T.C. T. STATE HIGHWAY N0. 114 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 19, 1998 REVISED JANUARY 23, 1998 Prepared By. Prepared For: HU1TT-2DLLA,RS MAGUIRE PARTNERS Huitt—Zollars, Inc. Engineering/Architecture Nine Village Circle 3131 McKinney Ave. Suite 600 Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75204 Southloke, Texas 76262 Phone (214) 871-3311 (817) 430-0303 Fax (214) 871-0757 ZA97-176 s SITE Ole OOnCN T ti Dove VICINITY MAP N.T.S. NG SUMMARY - Wit. -•` � � `s \�- �, i '%� \ '',� � J LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE L10 S 53'27 45" W 28.26' L11 N 36*3215' W 156.32' L12 N 18'45'03" W 81.41' L13 I N 89'28'00" W 1 25.00 NOTE: EXISTING TREES BEING DISPLACED BY NEW PARKING AREA TO BE TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN NEW PARKING AREA AND T.W. KING - ;-`� �? Q �4 TO SCREEN NEW PARKING AREA. �' 30' BUILDING LINE > �,�_ i Y—Vol. 388/211, PG. 68 do 69 / i% p� 2—LOADING SPACEScp �ti► / � X/ / / ---_4 i 25' PEDESTRAIN ACCESS EASEMENT A '� — -- Vol. 9437, PG. 1127 D.R.T.C.T. Vol. 2487, PG. 210 D.R.D.C.T. r , LEGEND o'�� / t. + EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT Ci ; `A POINT OF INGRESS/EGRESS Z. 066 CONTROL POINT o LP EXISTING LIGHT POLE / *LP PROPOSED LIGHT POLE EX. SIDEWALK / / / / ® TELEPHONE RISER TELEPHONE VAULT O FIRE HYD. NOTES: 8l 1. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT CURRENTLY PLATTED, HOWEVER / = •_'. �� ' -., � / I / � / A SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR PLATTING IS BEING PROCESSED WITH THE CITY CONCURRENT WITH THIS APPUCATION. 2. THIS APPLICATION REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM THE DRIVEWAY STACKING DEPTH FROM 75' TO 20'. \ / / 3. NO FENCING, WALLS OR SCREENING IS REQUIRED. kCES CHAIRMAN DATE MAYOR DATE _ PLANNING & ZONNING COMISSION CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 1 SITE PLAN THE SABRE GROUP PARKING LOT LOT/2 L , NORM PROJECT r w. 'mac S.y z LOCATION MAP N.T.S. 0 30 60 90 120 1 "=60' STATE OF TEXAS VOL. 10474, PG. 386 D.R. T.C. T. STATE HIGHWAY N0. 114 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 19, 1998 REVISED JANUARY 23, 1998 Prepared By. Prepared For: HU1TT-2DLLA,RS MAGUIRE PARTNERS Huitt—Zollars, Inc. Engineering/Architecture Nine Village Circle 3131 McKinney Ave. Suite 600 Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75204 Southloke, Texas 76262 Phone (214) 871-3311 (817) 430-0303 Fax (214) 871-0757 ZA97-176 NOTE: EXISTING TREES BEING DISPLACED BY NEW PARKING AREA TO BE TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN NEW PARKING AREA AND T.W. KING - ;-`� �? Q �4 TO SCREEN NEW PARKING AREA. �' 30' BUILDING LINE > �,�_ i Y—Vol. 388/211, PG. 68 do 69 / i% p� 2—LOADING SPACEScp �ti► / � X/ / / ---_4 i 25' PEDESTRAIN ACCESS EASEMENT A '� — -- Vol. 9437, PG. 1127 D.R.T.C.T. Vol. 2487, PG. 210 D.R.D.C.T. r , LEGEND o'�� / t. + EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT Ci ; `A POINT OF INGRESS/EGRESS Z. 066 CONTROL POINT o LP EXISTING LIGHT POLE / *LP PROPOSED LIGHT POLE EX. SIDEWALK / / / / ® TELEPHONE RISER TELEPHONE VAULT O FIRE HYD. NOTES: 8l 1. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT CURRENTLY PLATTED, HOWEVER / = •_'. �� ' -., � / I / � / A SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR PLATTING IS BEING PROCESSED WITH THE CITY CONCURRENT WITH THIS APPUCATION. 2. THIS APPLICATION REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM THE DRIVEWAY STACKING DEPTH FROM 75' TO 20'. \ / / 3. NO FENCING, WALLS OR SCREENING IS REQUIRED. kCES CHAIRMAN DATE MAYOR DATE _ PLANNING & ZONNING COMISSION CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 1 SITE PLAN THE SABRE GROUP PARKING LOT LOT/2 L , NORM PROJECT r w. 'mac S.y z LOCATION MAP N.T.S. 0 30 60 90 120 1 "=60' STATE OF TEXAS VOL. 10474, PG. 386 D.R. T.C. T. STATE HIGHWAY N0. 114 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 19, 1998 REVISED JANUARY 23, 1998 Prepared By. Prepared For: HU1TT-2DLLA,RS MAGUIRE PARTNERS Huitt—Zollars, Inc. Engineering/Architecture Nine Village Circle 3131 McKinney Ave. Suite 600 Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75204 Southloke, Texas 76262 Phone (214) 871-3311 (817) 430-0303 Fax (214) 871-0757 ZA97-176 0 0` J D m 0 z c z O � ` J m r. `ID N cn w z O -n OD0 0 U) N O N N 0 z z m 0 C m c J 0 L C V m c m m I � Li Lj Z m i z � m i z m O CZl r > Om z 0 71 O Z D 0 0 D O m m v cn U) o m r= v r= CD m 0 m r= z m x X Can cn O O O O z m m m U, U) m m 0 O O O < 0 -< U) :ji cu Cu C m m C F- FFn D Cr7 0 < Z Z z O< O m 0 a i9l Y 1 r N O I O Z D Z m ::2- Z mm�� 0 z p D I DO O O Z Z I cn I 0 = 0 m t N z 0 -{ O > t I O I C N O D' Q0UD z � o Z Z z 77 -'--' � M I -1 „ 10 r Z m O m m m- m O I BUFFERYARD TYPE IF-1 I � =0�00 ' 0 F- -1m0 I m m O< m r rM�-i cn n 0�rn0O m Z � Om -� 0 � m Dmom I ----� C) m 0 CD I M C C°C0� I t o M < C z m m t t 251.34' S 89° —x==x- -r- ° ° "v- "XI , I 1 I I I I r t 0 1 1 i � 1 I 1 I � I F- 0 0 O OD I ` t 110, BUFFERYARD TYPE F 1 I � I CD t � t 0 t t X { «` r N O • \ c 0 O I I / f z z mo \ o, _ D -I can � o�� f D O D nm y m I• FIR€ L/ttV ' FIRE LANE cnm U)I �10o' { Nm� r x ' I ♦ _ f I' d m C D i m ♦f� O m U) X 0 z *' ♦ ♦ r z w , CIS • `� ...: :.. BUILDING „C' 21,768 S.F. rcni �, r • I .s. f'' -'�`' � T-;-:, .: �.'.. :'. « ♦� ROAD AY , • � • ♦. � , ' • ,' ♦ ' ' -..• _ �� R.O.W. 60' R. ♦ « { f f tit f . . ♦ . ..{ Tom- « f ♦ ♦ f ♦ f ram= . { .. .. .. '• •♦' �. i_•: . ��..� .. •♦ • :,• Yam• • . • " ': ' ' -_ ` • . i' f _ ' SAy,fApY { « « • C� c-�c-� D�za)O� D N D DmDm mm0m0c c ^ z < z < O< <<-4_ O C /l > m Cu>ccn m�nmcnp� c Q0 �o�o LUoCDC)mc T z m m N _1 00 N W CD � CO O CD C FTC J — _• f f f f f f �1••—�L . • • • f f f f♦ f f f f 41 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT ♦ f f « f - ♦�. 253.15' S 83° 32' 18" E 30' BUILDING SETBACK C N O O Z n O D cn cn m m 'n Z> C m C/ D � z c 0 cm!> D r x m m z m ��jI Z _pm O cf)mm M Cf)0�� °Jz0 m m 0 Dm I U mD o1- I— mo Dm z 0 ZD m0 z 00 rn--� z= m Om ➢Cf) -n :17 Go :r co m� 00 Z Z 0 zm D cn C Di co �0 Z z m D - z� m - N CTI O 5 (FRONT) I - - - BUFFERYARD TYPE "A" 10, BUFFERYARD TYPE "F-1" I FT r- r R --U0E--DZMZ oF- cnmr=W--i &0Omrn-Anc�o��0-UW CODm�:v=Q=M o DOD00�ODZDOZO= ivxmD�zmo0CD00m �0 D00 O Z�-P,a)0m0CmCm rvm r-�_mZo=CD�7��i ACC --i > m-2 m m�0m==mD ,ipDZO OOz�yzmm�mDz <-imo>> ��oD cmi> oCC-) D oOD m n O:7m0O:7-- <cn� �m-�� cn .IzO��C�Dv�7rD�� 0 �C7�7r=m rtC-0z O�0)C�Lu�7=ern ry _�-un�m---j n �c-nm0 smODm=n w::E:l cmnrr�OZDz J Z� mr=OD�_ ��OA�—nO�r�,�� nZ0 A m�i��Xm�ODDz� � ��zmzA cn �ZD000�zZ-�DZm�= m>mzc—)��C-iymmU) w�ZDZ�� Oc zm n0 =°w° O�I�i�O-i mm�mOO�m 0�r1�z�DDCn�7 -i O zcom D m0. ° -1� O <� pC<x �O- 0D0�ocm = ODZZ:)jf ��CDnOm JN mO=z�cn'Oc-+o> cDi>OmcDn�O�D<, l ��T'O m0-1 OcNnCDa° O�D�Z-� mm=Z� n�m�m�OZmD m O�OD n < nC O:u-jj > 0 -- M>OZ<ECm mm n I prm0=m=cn�mm „zcDi� mmmnpODo�mmD I-0000ozom O 0>>m➢Om�m0 ) O<m0-T�zzmo0zm 0m0�COzocw-- 01-z-inZC7m ZmD m iw�D_---n -i �r-,� uow0 Z� m im Oz --iZD z D�=w D -n cn-Omm D < D�mO �D �� I- <Dzpm+'DO<�0m zcnom�co - zD�m�z2 umOcmxz O�ozm�oODmDZZI �0zDZ0r��0 <m DO ozmD -I Cr iy-m�,r-2 M0 <muOXZ� p iZ�0�pr- DZz—A <1Ornm- D� ADO-<c-<c�� C:D mnz<O�mOm �zmp-rk-A � � m�CmOm oo> m- Z mCr-0 r� � rtC7�-�- =Dm ��FTI mm<oO-Oc�ZzzrnD �� m0=Z-T,> DDm0v0Z- m c�7\>w �mm=wumvo0 �DDnzomoo>rnz mz�mmmmn� w mOmca�OZm Dm0�0�m = 0 0 �0� IT SA) w 07 �m O- CD om z z m O D O �z vzODz <�Oxz= ��0��-TI0= cnD°'0>0�u mzz= MO�D�7D0� 0- ➢00 �rn �cmnmz >2mzzr\)Z C�mz>---AM mm �mM> M>--I m�=zp0 �O: OD z�Dm�<-+mO��m z2DZ<D m f�-� 0 mOmm jCb__j wm O➢_mOZ =i mmzl iDmO �CD-nG) mpmmcnz mmmm�U) MCC—j�Z-n0DZDcn o-n0 0 0 cn ,-C M-0 Om0-io�00c>-A 0C pip m>�Dm M2 0m U)�mCmc Dcn -'' D -T, 0 <0c p— n� m� �m�0m� OC 00z�= Qmu> Z=a) c� zw- O m m = A O 0< DmOz> -: 0 cD O m� O O D -� � ---+ 00 z7 O z -T z O 0 C)o o0�mm nmZ-o mD�D=co mzmD�pcn0 r'j Cam-i�-1 Cn�7=N-i �rnm N D0m �7m- � ZQZr N U)DD�cnO -A 0G�Dzly �mc�nDZ� DD On m nmrZ-7 �0zm = ��GmiZCn mZOmw O�Ozm� m�7�I :J) ICDmm �rr,O��m ➢Z�Oc a'z�0 ODpOx Dmmmcn0©Dz -' > O-� �m zGZ�Jm iODD� Z z -iim OKDZDm� 00�� oz�mm�7 �- Dmm �Dz�cmi) mmm0zc m0m0000D�> mC)2i)0 C-) co >z0m-i �D��O-i �z➢� UZmm�zO� � �Cr 0�+ �00�� OXozmC) Dmu> Z0cDmOz= cnG)O z ov-+0 m n-I—i mz_ �r-mo 2 m�-I mDz Co p- cn0 �z D- -i u- cnmrn Cm r- mz�O �-, 0-� zoD �= m--1 Opmcnm �c-orn0>m OmXO-I- o�z= p-+�,0-+ 0>mw D Z m0mrn0�Zmn0 -i Z --io,- --in -nDCC)�= 0 DF-Z �mm�Z CooO ocDn rv� m- 000 z�cnm D-1mOZO mmr'- 050mv�106nc O �mz---A 7 c➢i»�m0 zG)mz0 �Dm0-Irl 000O=cnDDOIvD� mZ D 0 m -i m Z00Nz D mmc''z rz=m mO� rn�z20 -�0 mz�m O z x Om zc"m -I O �0 �D mz mm Z m z Z m m 0 D r co co co O D C m C 0 D 0 = O cn �^ O O i-1 O O r r r TI m D 0 D 2 2 2 0 m c0 O y z `/ = �7 Cn C7 C ny U n n� D� O�� mzam� mDO D D mz7 -� „ D O C nooD m 0�00 C) Z z O (Tj rn O < 0 � m m N Z CD mC O H n -gy m C/) 0 cnC-7 —i -N �i m C ZTZ� i� _� J m < C D D r D z c� O y m D m O D m Z- z o� D m �-7 D zo D ° Z 1 II I" 1J / 0 m 0 D cl) Z D o z � x D �'N z O m 0 z -4 m r D cr> D O m z D 0 0 cn D O 0 O G) D o n D CD cn c� N G) = 0 �� v> :-n�' > m c 0 cn c c tT N N N C D z �' rnrnrn r r z5� cn to cn --I o cn -n ?I `n ?i O m z z > D r z mOm �- cn D � mDo � DZ �0� -u> z ➢zz p �0� Q Ucn� OAT. 0 :g0> c v�0 c Ox�O� mzG) n G)0D m mm� m D ; DO �m0 -0 cn�Fn 0 z�m o m I �C0� Z ��O z 00--- D uz O NOD m cf). �D� m0� D rnm m- DOD T. m0-V O�� mDO r-v0m 6 t z ADD =o<� r z;,\ O -n D> m02 O Gjp z Z m r z'0 < � 11 c cn D �tuD 0 0--, o ?t-Icn z 71 mz 00�m 0 zm > Omrr D a'�O� z mmD D (n Z� �-�_ �z� DC)m co i Om nmD xm ��nn zm0 G� �z Dm rT'� D O<m D D �m fJm r-m m C-) �_ cr- 0Z m Z zz m0 �Oz D 0 0 m D z v z 0 m cn m � 0 z 0 D= 0m mm0 0>0 � uC CnzG) 00 z� O33 :u -T, 00 O= �Cm7 Ocn Mz z0 co 0 00 0� � m �� _ _-- o co SOUTHLgKE BLVD. z I 1 \ I N O c -' 0 O Z 1 _ Z Z t r Z m O t t I < <� M 1 c 0 0 I I m-� 1 Q Z m C N O I I \ L D S O O I D O Z ` Z ,m,7 I r I 1 \ � D T � O t U' Z 11 cn D z I m� 0 0 Z I I \ z O D ' c D p Z Z � =i 1 m 0 I z t \ 1 0 > m n t I 1 Z c I _ D D m t m 0 I I— D r -n t I t \ C D Z I - _ r cn C C) z O I I Z m/ 0 ` m I Z t— G7 D I cn I O O I I O Cn D z _ z M m I t t x 1 m _ I m \ U I I m m `\ > U SOUTHLAKE GARDEN OFFICES N FOR S-P-2 ZONING REQUEST WITH "0-1" USES, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 6.1441 ACRES CONCEPT PLA APPLICANT: DAVID L FORD OWNER: 1709 JOINT VENTURE PARTNERS P.O. BOX 1702 C/O MIKE FARHAT ROANOKE, TEXAS 76262 r 0O 0 � 0 D➢ ➢ m D z D m z D 1� � p r U) 0 r -u z Z 0 n m -u m m m y D m � w m z _ Z CD C)Z z Zco CD O -n cf) -I m O m o m -n O m -n 00 co 0 O r' 0 �7 JJ D D N IV N N v � m O m (j D^ m W � U'_ D U)cmi) Co D LESLIE THOMPSON / CONTRACT DRAF71NC 1320 PRUDENTIAL DR. SUITE 100 DALLAS, TEXAS 75235 214/ 637-3047 FAX: 214/637-3229 SITE DATA miAsE I- EXISTING) LOT I-R-L BLOCK I GEORGETOWN PARK SOL T IAKE, TARRANT CO., TEXAS LAND AREA: 73,606 SF 111.69 sF> C-? --. — LAND USE: M/xED GENERAL OFFICE L_ 16,E i P.41�CIMs REQ'D: 64 !'A N42 P OVD. 7,® ANDIW L. JAMES JR AND WIFE L INDA JAME5 SITE DATA MiM B- UNDER coNmSTRucT1w(" LOT I-R-2, BLOCK I GEORGETUWN PARK SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT CO., TEXAS LAND AREA: 32,129 5F (0.738 SF) C-2 - — LAND USE: I MIXED -- GENERAL OFFICE SF PAR'C/NG REQ D: 32 PARKING PROV D: 36 SITE DATA (PHASE m- PRoPosw LOT I-R-3, BLOCK I GEORGETOWN PARK SOUTHLAICE., TARRANT CO., TEXAS LAND AREA., 70,W7 5F ( 1.63 ACRES.) ZOY,E'D: C-? LAND USE: MIXED CSONEERAL ORIFICE 13,178 5F PAMC/NG REQD so PAWA6 PROUD: &C SITE DATA ( PROPOSED ) LOT 3, BLOCK I GEORGETOWN PARK SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT CO., TEXAS LAND AREA: 4C 707 SF (0.935 SF) ZONED: G-? LAND USE, MIXED GENERAL OFFICE 8,090 sF - rOTAL RENTABLE SF 8,090 sF PAWNS AEOV: 32 -PAMCING PROY'D: 32 SITE DATA( PROPOSED } LOT 2, BLOCK I GEORGETOWN PARK SOLITILAKE, TARRANT CO., TEXAS LAND A E 4: 7/,471 SF ( l64 ACRES) ZONED: C-2 LAD USE: MIXED GENERAL CMICE 15,CCO SF MEDICAL OFF/CE 2000 5F 1eErA/L 6 700 SF rOrAL RENTABLE sF ?3.700 s✓` PAR�/NCs REQ D: 102 PaI�C/NG PROV'D: 91 ___�� SITE DATA ( PROPOSED ) LOT 4 GORDON NETTLETON SOUTHIAKFE, TARRANT CO., TEXAS LAND AREA: 109,771 5F < 232 ACRE5 —ZONED= ACs LAID USE: MIXED GENERAL OFFICE 19 300 5F MEDICAL OFFICE 1,5ee 5F RETAIL 9s 00 SF TOTAL RENTABLE SF 30,0 PAW/NG aROV'D- APPLICANT PREPARER- RFA T-r- CAP/TAL CORPO�TI Cn< AS50C/ATEB /NC. 920 s. Main st., Suite 170 2045 N. I-J)cghway 360 suits *I60 Csrapevine, Texas 76051 Tel. (0/7) 4a8-4200 Grand Prairie, TX. 75050 Fax: (617.) 4eO-5257 TeL: (e/7) 640-010C Fax: (OfV 633 -3309 VARIANCES: • J BrACKlNG CEPTH: AFFOUIRFD: 75' PR0F`0_4EC: 44' *? STACK1Wi DEPTH: REOUIRED: 75' PRt7Pb8ED- 50' • 3 STACKING DEPTH: REOUIRED: 75, PROPC3ED: 50' NOTE ENT IRE PROPOSED SITE 15 F 4EA1IL Y WOODED. PDDITION l I NOWARD E. CARR JR ERR r/AL L EN A , ExiSTING VOL. B091 PAGE 1490 I l LOT 1 BLOCK 1 -- ?7' UADE COI ItfG�'v' l l5' SIDE FARO hC' LANDSC.4P£ (APPROVED FINAL PLAT) D.RTG.T. EXISTING 1 •- � ' Access EA�r BU1L01W_j SET B.acK Bi l�ER Tl PE e' I ZONED C3 / ZONED AG. lie , .WDSGAPE I ' LAND U5E DESIGNATION: MIXED BtfFER TIVPE B LAND USE DESIGNATION: P•IIXED 5 rt. UE , 5ft.U.E. I L — ---------- - -- _ _ _ 912.4C' N 00d 0053' W _ J kt ;t 1 1� I I� I 1 r J 1 A 1 1 an 14 1� 1 I� I l r l l k l"r 1 l r .l l am t 1� 1 1 r 1 r 1 1� 11—tom l► A l J r--1 1 1 1 I t� t l`am I I !• 1Ino 1 1� I.I � I L� t t� 11 � 1 j am 11.E I I M I 1� 11 � I 1 no l l� 1 1 M I 1� 1 1� 1 1� I I� I I� l 1 l l� I t r-1 1� 1 1� ----------------- 3= ( rL+' LANDSCAPE -1 - - - - 01 BuFMER TYPff 'a' r � EXISTING I I < �� _ I- / r- - - --- - -- ---- I 1 5 ' L ANDSGAPE 1 1 j; LOB' 1 R-2, BLOCK 1 GEORGETOWN PAR / E � 10 LANDSCAPE o I _ 5 d <-- - -- �. _a a -e r ✓ J . IU C exrsr - — - ---- '�� TYPE Fr ' 5, LAND.SC AV INCROPE:4T1E5 LTD. _ MEADOW OAKS SUBD/V/SloN j , 10' LANDSCAPE BIER TrPE ;'a. PHASE II C ALL o - _— _ , j' / VOL . l?I?3. PAGE ? 1B 88-1?9 PAGE 39 - Bt.�ER TrpE 'B' I I PHASE I ! I LOT 1-R-1, BLOCK 1 �� / �' ! ' DRTC.r vOL 3 _ I - r_ J = / / l ' ^� rA TJc XAS ZONED C3 1=RT,C. r _ ___ r l ER CONSTRU ✓ - * ; zcwED 5F/A car�MaN ( E��STING) GEORGETOWN PARK , L AND USE DES/GNA TlON: - ; _ I = + I _ at=cEss EAs0rJENT------- -- l VOL 9a04: p AGE s 06 r LAND USE DE5 /GN 4 T10N: MIXED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL If - - - - - -- — ROGER GL ENN W!L L lAM5 MEADOW OAKS VOL. 1062. PAGE 1665 D.F_7C,7 ZONED AG LAND USE DESIGNA71CN: LOW DEN6/rr RESlDENTI --,- - - -- �---- - --- _�- - - - - - - - - --- ---Ex/srrNG '' I , -- - -- - -- - —% -- I -1 I�-.� j I I BUFFER rYPE 'A' I / 1 I � t J am I 1 1 1 1 mum,; 1 J 1 Ili It#111111,id i 1 � -I _ �71 L � LOT 1- I BLOCK 1 1$rl,,,� // /Lh Ex t GENTER L lNE t ✓ 1 1'~ •� I ""'; IGEOF GETOVI N PARK _ g' L. ss�� N 8 3 �.¢•� %T�i�i/' 439D9' taOGy OC120' iLi AGGE55 E.a$t?.*N, t= - -- BU FER TYPE 'A' ?5' F/RLc LANE ' UTILITY E,454f EN' / _ _ _ — _ - -- - — ?ACCDss EEASEMENT . 1m % EX(9TJlvri `�� {r�1 l - — 36' WIDE - UJriL/TY E4SET1ENr p� • �/ iJ r PHASE ' ACCESS E 4v _ ?e/' LANDSCAPE / 10L 1 2 BANK e4sFER 7 , 7 O ' PROPIOS I 1 VOL. 1????. PAGE /970 ( I I ' -= I oSED 'K l ZONED C? EXIS ING $, LaNDsc,4PE' / � _ / LAND USE DESIGNATION: MIXED b BUFFER TYPE 'A' 9 Q 1 � 7 (/'�] �S rh f I 4 Z �✓ N I ■ 2 � i I PROPOSED e 2 S TOR/E5 1 1 'CsFNERAL OFFICE' '` 15,000 SF 'LTG 6,03C 5F - 'MEDICAL OFF/CE' - 6 700 _13F 14 ` pp -i 7 { 5 L �WDSGAPE 2,Ccw CIF 707AL OFFICE SPACE' ` ' �� - — — — — — — — — — — -- - �/ (; , - ' 1 _ PROPOSED 7 5' LANDSCAPE I xn �r --------- - EX/SrING 1y - - - - I ' PROPOSED - PROPOSED------y _Ik_?_ i0'LANDSGAPE -- J - -- ------------------------ - --- - -- - 5,L1lNDS-- CAPE-- -- LIlk _� r 11�►{>r11>•tltr 11r11 �t1r11rit �11=I1r II�11r1I�1rr1 1 r1t II�11rt1r1Ir11�11�t......tr�t,1—�Ir11 �M1tl�tt�lrt amtt�a(�11=wit am ri*M atom t+� tt��/t��t �ltt� I�tt� t+MIl�/�Iv �/ lr�It�lll ��ti.�l"t — I�tt�tt Ott 5TATE OFTEXA5 !s' SIDE YARD -"` -`- \ VOL 9336. PAGE 0113 - 1 12 EX15TIN t BUILDING SET BACK ExIST--------- - - ---------------------------------- -------------%-%-$- -- --_ l0' LANDSCAPE 5' L DSCAF7E BUFFER Tl'PF B" OOPPFON �— D LOT 3 BLOCK 1 - / .4G'C".E°.f8 E.43af7'ENr PROPOSE � _ �/1/1/ -' j�� PROPOSED LOT 2, BLOCK 1 GEORGETOWN PARK - FUTURE 5TREET EX7ErISICN f i / � '7 GEORGETOWN PARK 4 f r1 7.a� VOL. 6716. PAGE 764 _ ` , l D.R. rC- r- 1 I ' 7 -7 _ ZONED AG - 3 Ir ` r l / LAND USE DESIGNATION: 111XED i * ! �i * / I-1ARLEY E. t CHARLOTTE J. EATON i, " / VOL. 12266. PAGE 1602 6 / f I D.RT.C.r ? ? ��' / 1 _ / ZONED AG LAND USE DES/CsNATION: MIXED � 1 STORY ;� / , •�� l Lu ' BUILDING "B ?®':LAnIDSC�aPE 7 'RET,4lL • BlOFER 7--0�'E '0' l LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING 2.52 ecree sltt.ated +n the rl-1Gi"1A6 EASTFR SU/RyEY, Abstract 474, Tarrant Cotwtty, Texas and being the renalyder or a tract conveyed to Gordon Nett/etor et ux as recorded in volume. WO Pigs 177 Deed Fecorde, Tarrant County; Texas and heing more particularly described as I'ollowa BEGINNING at a 510 Inch Iron rod Found In thn south line oFE. South/ake Blvd (FM. 1709), said point also bang the northeast comer Ora tract Conveyeld to Georgetoun Monticello Partners, Ltd. as recorded in County Cleric's F1/e No, D/9713215et THENCE- S 70d47'12E along said south Ifne For a distance or 30l?a Feat to a 5/0 inch iron rod Found /r the northernmost west fire or a tract :onveyed to Emily Shenk/in as recorded In volume 0710, Page 747, Deed ,Rscorda. Tarrant County, Texeat THENCE: S 00d01'3B'Gl along said :neat ilne for a d/stancaor 33635 rest to a point In the westernmost north /lne of sald 50arklln tracts THENCE: N e9d 5872 t1J e.'ang said north line for a dlatarca 284.55 root to a 314 Inch fret pike Found Jr, the erorement/oneea east line of Gsorge.own Monticello Partners, Ltd. tract t THENCE, N 00d 01'38'E along said east Ilse for a distance of 43537 rmst to the POINT OF BEGIMWNG and CONTA/NiWa 22U acres of land, wre or less, es surveyed by Steven W Nughees, Regeisterd Profeloolonal Land Surveyor, during the month of Ocotber 1997 0 13, SF E 9 11 9, , 0 5F J 1 PROPOSED = 7•JED/GAL OFFICE' !? sF i0' L._INDSCAFE l,✓" �'�i •-/ I / / BUFFER 'r?'PE 'B' - 'TOTAL Of--FICE SPACE i /� / rOTAL a¢IC� 15,500 SF. I l SPACE' 2 670RIE6 ' 10 ft. Utility Easswrant - * I %s EIPAf, If PROPOSED LOT 4 GORDON NETTLETON / B' SIDE Y.41FD - -- - - --- - / I i , �4 - 1/drl�9rlG6 a ? RrGlar-1N `� • . PROPOSED ONLY / _ s' iwDscAr liariarc " l BUFFER TYFE L I, 11 1I 11 11 11 er 11 11 tt t1 tI 1t�II�II 1t 11 tt 1I 11 11 II II II II 11 60' R.O.W. DEDICATION) EMIL. Y SN.ANKL IN VOL. 6716. PAGE 764 / D.R T.C. T. ZONED AG LAND USE DESIGNATION: r 1XED PROPOSED ZONING: "C-2" J / VICRgrrY MAP ti�Ty ems,, -1709 SOUTNLAKE J Y U w P10G1ICGT LQCATIt N M Cj Ln rn < `O Lu uJ X < CL o0 0 O Z 0 C7 `O REVISIONS J2/17/97 —___-- 12/22197 1/2,0/97 -- JOB NO: LSSUE DATE 11A7/97 SHEET INFO CONCEPT RUN SHEET NO. FI_F: 1:\GF.0RGF\PHAS`4\SITFC1Tv EDITOR: K.N. 3:40 P.P . 0! ' 19'98 DRFVIOUS =DITOR: K.N. 1 1:44 A.V. 01 i 19 /y�i EXISTING ZONING: "AG" j� PREPARATION DATE: umm DWG. FI _F SCNLF: 1 "=40' PRN: RFC'V. __ _ CHK j': .'OID: - AND THAT WHEREAS Lien Holder's Ratification of P1at:Lot 2-R-1 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT Whereas, acting by and through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent, is (Are) the lien holders(s) of the property described hereon, does(do) hereby ratify all dedications and provisions of this plat as shown. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me to he the person(s) whose nam�(s) is(are subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that (he/she/they) executed the same for the purposes and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated and as the act and deed of said GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the day of , 1998. 0 5 0 I q 0 -- 2( 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE 11% Wo ' STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS WHEREAS, hereinafter called "Owner' (whether one or more), is the owner of ,hat certain }parcel of land situated to or .ttthin the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Tarrant and Denton Counties, Texas, being more particularly described hereon for all purposes: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ZONE AND 00/100 (SI.00) DOLLAR, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, Owner(s) do(es) hereby waive, release, quitclaim, and forever hold harmiess the City of Southlake, Texas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter call "City", from any and all claims for damage of any kind that Owner(s) may now have or may hereinafter have in the future by reason of the passage of all aircraft ("aircraft" being defined for the purposes of this instrument as any contrivance now known or hereinafter, invented, used, or designed for navigation of or flight In the air) by whomsoever owned and operated, in the air- space above Owner's property, as hereon before described, and above the surface of Owner's property such noises, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft landing at or taking off from, or operating at or on the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; and Owners do hereby fully having remiss, and release any right or cause of action which it may now have or which it may in the future have against the City, whether such claim be for injury to person or damage to property due to noses, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel and lubricant particles, and all the other effects that may be caused or may have been caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off from, or the operation and/or maintenance of aircraft or aircraft engine at or on said Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. It is agreed that this release shall be binding upon the Owner, their heirs and assigns, and successors in interest with regard to said property located in or in the extratemtorial jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, running with the land, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of Tarrant County or Denton County, as appropriate, Texas. Executed this day of , A.D., 19 ownerls) - W-IF— La - I SELLING A PORTION OF ANY LOT WITHIN THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOIINOS IS A VIOLATION OF STATE LAW AND CITY I ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF tITILITIES AND BUILDING, PERMITS. f APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date: Chairman:- P&Z Secretary: APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Date: Mayor: City Secretary: 0 Notary P u b l i c — --- -- --- --.-� Commission expires: Lot I-R CABINET A, SLIDE 1252 Lot 5 PRTCT CABINETA,SLIDE 1252 PRTCT set, N89057'21"E 169.01 a R=217.23 L=32.30 %r• /.t F w ul LC= N19°44 25"E 32.27 �d� POBj �0 1 N24°o0'00��E 18,51 /1 � 'n J co °D R = 132.43 L= 64.71 1 Lot 2-R-I U c7 z t'M J LC = N 10°OC100"E64.0 co N o I �2�� 26308 SF M �x > N4°OO'00"W28.24 W N89°57 21t E 196.77 o 1 I X c 5 LON AVIGATION c0 N 4°00 00 W 64.96 - t... w 1�► c:: 11co oi COD/ZZI Qp R=328.00 L=22.6511 \2 Ot 32 FR N I LC = N 2°01'20"W22-6 /Z%f JI wPOB w = N O°02'39"W 25.25 - N89°57' 21"E 191.51 rn W 1\10°0239"W 13.72 ----- ` P08 N I z Y'^ O O 10' D8&UE— o 001 N t1- O z Q NO 0052E 156.69 Lot 3-11-1-11 r to SF lti oZ3ZG4I o0 Lot 413 o� < _J - — CABINET A, SLICE 3901/Z4_5 a Bo „ � � PRTCT 589° 58' 26"VV 191. 67 Y v CC G _ I O 56' Lot 3R2 o � J n ~ Block I i 28' 28' CABINET A J / SLIDE 3901 PRTCT _-- S I T E !j0' 1 JOW A. F41YT 9.WINALE IOIwOATN VICINITY MAP OWNER `S. Lot 2-R-1 Gary and Janice Miron '675 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Tx 76092 LOT 2-R-2 David Ewan 2R Upper Lake Road Oak Ridge, NJ o7d38 Lot 3-R-1- R Martin Schelling, Tr. 601 W. Wall St. Grapevine, Tx 76051 DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT THAT WHEREAS, Gary A. Miron and wife Janice L. Miron are the owners of a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, of MIRJN ADDITION , an addition to the City of Southlake, as shown on a plat of record in Cabinet A, Slide 125?, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, by deed of record in Volume 12263, Page 2227, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said portion of Lot 2 being more particularly described by metes and hounds as follows: BEGINNING at a V iron found at the Northeast corner of said Lot 2 in the West line of Lot 1, Block 1, Woodland Heights Addition to the City of Southlake, as shown on a plat of record in Volume 388-155, Page 13, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S. 00 - 02' - 39" F. 138.54 feet along said West line to a 3" iron found in same at the Northeast corner of a tract described in a deed to David Cwan of record in Volume 12039, Page 2019, Deed Records, Tarrant county, Texas; THENCE S. 890 - 57' - 21" W. 196.77 feet along the North line of the last referenced tract to an X found cut in concrete in the East line of Miron Drive; THENCE N. 40 - 00' - 00" W. along said Cast line 28.24 feet to a 1" iron found in same, said point being the PC of a curve to the Right having a radius of 132.43 feet and whose long chord bears N. 100 - 00' E. 64.07 feet; THENCE with the arc of said curve and said right-of-way line a distance of 64.71 feet to a i" iron found at the PT of game; THENCE N. 240 - 00' - 00" E. 18.51 feet continuing along said line to a nail found in same. said point being the PC of a curve to the Left having a radius of 217.?3 feet and whose long chord hears N. 190 - 44' - 25" E. ??.27 feet; THENCE with the arc of said cttt-ve and said right-of-w-iy line 3?.30 feet to a V iron found in same for corner; THENCE N. 890 - 57' - 21" E. along the North line of tot 2, Block 1, above referenced 169.01 foet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. AND CONTAINING 26308 SF AND THAI WHEREAS, David Ewan is the owner of a portion of Lot ?, Block 1, MIRON ADDITION , an addition to the City of Southlake, as shown on a. plat of record in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, by deed of record in Volume 12039, Page 2019, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said portion being more particularly described by metes and hounds as follows: Martin W. Schelling, Trustee, is the owner of a portion of Lot 2, and Lot 3R1, Block 1, of Miron Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, as shown on a plat of record in Cabinet A, Slide 1252, and in Cabinet A, Slide 3901, Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texas, as described in deeds of record in Volume 12768, Page 557,and Volume 12376, Page 1565, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and hounds as follows; BEGINNING at a i" iron found at the Southeast corner of a tract described in a deed to David Ewan of record in Volume 12039, Page 2019, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said point being in the East line of Lot 2, Block 1, above referenced and the West line of Lot 1, Block 1, of Woodland Heights Addition as shown on a plat of record in Volume 388-155, Page 13, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said point also being N. 00 - 02' - 39" W. 13.72 feet from the Southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, of Miron Subdivision, above referenced; THENCE S. 00 - 02' - 39" E. 170.47 feet to and along the East line of Lot 3, Block 1, of said Miron Subdivision to a 1" iron set in same in the West line of Lot 2, Block 1, of Woodland Heights Addition, above referenced; THENCE S. 890 - 58' - 2.6" W. 191.67 feet to a P" iron set in the East line of Miron Drive; THENCE N. 00 - 00, - 52" E. along said East line 156.69 feet to a I" iron found at the Southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Miron Subdivision, above referenced; THENCE N. 00 - 02.' - 391" W. along said West line 13.72 feet to a i" iron found at the Southwest corner of the tract described in Volume 12039, Page 2019, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; TIIENCF N. 890 - 57' - 21" E. along the South line of the last referenced tract 191 .51 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.AND CONTAINING 32641 Sr NOW THEREFORE, KNOW ALL 44EN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT, Gary A. Miron and wife Janice L. Miron, David Ewan and Martin W. Schelling, Trustee, the undersigned, do hereby adopt this plat designating the above described property to he known as Lots 2-R-1, 2-R-2, and 3-R-I-R, Block 1, MIRON ADDITION , an addition to the City of Southlake Tarrant County, Texas, in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, and do hereby dedicate to the use of the public all rights -of -way and easements a s shown hereon . THIS PLAT DOES NOT ALTER OR REMOVE EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS OR COVENANTS, IF ANY COMMENCE at a i" iron found at the Southeast corner of said Lot 2 in the WITNESS MY HAND this day of 1998. West line of Lot 1 of Woodland Heights Addition to the City of — -- Southlake, as shown on a plat of record in Volume 388-155, Page 13, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, thence N. Oct -02'- Gary A. Miron Janice L. Miron 39" W. 13.72 feet along the East line of said Lot 2 to a i" iron set in same for the Southeast corner and POINT OF BEGINNING of STATE OF TEXAS the herein described tract; COUNTY OF TARRANT THENCE S. 890 - 57' - 21" W. 191.51 feet to a !" iron found in the East BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared right-of-way line of Miron Drive; Gary A. Miron and Janice L. Miron, known to me to he the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they THENCE N. 00 - 02-' - 39" W. 25.25 feet along said East line to a i" iron executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and found in same, said point being the PC of a curve to the Left in the capacity therein stated. having a radius of 3?8.0 feet and whose long chord bears N. 20 - 01' - 20" W. 2?.64 feet; GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SFAL OF OFFICE on this day of 1998. _ THENCE with the arc of said curve 22.65 feet to a i" iron found at the -- PT of same; THENCE N. 40 - 00' - 00" W. 64.96 feet continuing alonj said right -of- Notary Public in and for the State of Texas way line to an X cut in concrete; WITNESS MY HAND this of 1998, _day — THENCE N. 890 - 57' - 21" E. 196.77 feet to a i" iron found in the East line of Lot 2, above referenced; David Ewan THENCE S. 00 - 02' - 39" E. 112.68 feet along said East line to the STATE OF TEXAS POINT OF BEGINNING. AND CONTAINING 21773 SF COUNTY OF TARRANT THERE ARE 'NO LIENS AGAINST THIS LOT --�=? Lien Holder's Ratification of Mat: Lot 3-R-1-�t STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT Whereas, acting by and through the undersigned, its duly authorized agent, is(are) the li-n holder(s) of the --� property described hereon, does(do) hereby ratify all dedications and ��-----,= provisions of this plat as shown. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT +O°k, BEFORE ME, the undersigned Authorit y, on this day personally appParAd I` !' known to me to he the person(s) whose name s is are — subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that (he/she/they) executed the same for the purposes and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated and as the act and deed of said GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the day PLAT REVISION Notary Public LOTS 2-R-I 12-R-21& 3-R-1-R ; BLOCK I, Commission expires: --- MIRON ADDITION BEING A REVISION OF LOT2, BLOCK I, AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1252, PRTCT, AND LOT 3R I, BLOC K I, OF MIRON ADDITION AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 390 I, PRTCT, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, IN THE JOHN A.FREEMAN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 529 1.853 Acres 3 Lots December 1997 BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared David Ewan, known to me to he the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to nip that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this day of 1998. ` l�1ITNFSS MY HAND this STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT Notary Public in and for the State of Texas clay of , 1998. Martin W. Schelling, Trustee BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Martin W. Schelling, Trustee, known to me to he the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY VIAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this day of , 1998. THIS is to certify that I�i1/r9LTfP �/.,�,ye,� a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, have platted the above subdivision from a actual survey on the ground; and that all lot corners ,and angle points, and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me or under my direction and supervision. Notary Pulhic in and for the State of Texas REO JAN 2 61998 Texas Registration No. 2014, THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET SLIDE -DAT (_W)t NU. L A 97-177