Loading...
1995-10-03 CC Packet cl_IIiiiiii0 city manager ' s report 44111 spiN ' ° september 15 , 1995 #M `' V. Neighborhood Watch Your Speeding! It All Starts Next Week... Preservation Ordinance ADVENTURE ALLEY Approved by P&Z At its September 5 meeting, the City Council approved Long-awaited construction of The Planning & Zoning Ordinance No. 642 which, Southlake's newest Commission approved among other things, changes playground, Adventure Alley, Ordinance 480-Q at its the speed limit on FM 1938 begins September 19. September 7, 1995 meeting. (Davis Blvd.), south of FM Volunteers are_still needed! This ordinance, known as the 1709 to Southlake's city Anyone who can spare some Neighborhood Preservation limits, from 55 mph to 45 time can find fun and Ordinance, will be considered mph. The new ordinance also adventure in building the at the October 3, 1995 City revises the speed limit on S. playground. Call the Council meeting. Please call White Chapel (from FM 1709 Adventure Alley HOTLINE at (1.:g Last at 481-5581 ext. to Continental Blvd.) to 30 595-6554 to sign up. ';4 with questions about the mph. Questions? Call ordinance. Southlake's Department of (C2:3° Public Safety at 481-5581 ext. SPECIAL NEWSLETTER 731. COMING IN OCTOBER _MINIElk Another "special edition" of Southlake In Review is coming Irill soon. The newsletter should COUNCIL ESTABLISHES be in homes by late October. COMING SOON... NEW DEPARTMENT Watch your mailbox for an Thoroughfare Plan Update oversized newsletter full of Due to significant growth in good information! Southlake's Thoroughfare the City's parks and recreation Plan will be updated through facilities and programs, the a process which will begin in City Council recently late October or November. upgraded Parks and Note: This report is provided Interested residents may watch Recreation from Division to keep SPIN members and the for details in upcoming status to a Department. Parks neighborhoods up-to-date on editions of the City Manager's and Recreation has been under the latest news from City Hall. Report. In the meantime, the supervision of the CMO. If you have questions or please contact Greg Last or In related action, the Council content suggestions, please (aw"om Elgin at extension 744 approved the appointment of contact the City Manager's for more information. Kim McAdams as Director of Office. Parks and Recreation. i IMPACT FEE Street Name Changes... It CONSTRUCTION STUDY UPDATE has been brought to staffs CONSTRUCTION ,,, attention that several CONSTRUCTION The Capital Improvements inconsistencies exist in street Advisory Committee (CIAC) names, particularly in the en Bicentnial Park - The has made good progress vicinity of Shady Lane. Staff Biceballfntennial lds and drainage toward completing their study has researched this issue and channel have been fertilized, of roadway, water and sewer provided Council with a and the concession foundation impact fees. A tentative report. Council will provide poured. The remaining schedule has been set for direction on which names irrigation, landscaping and completion of the project as should be adopted as the follows: "official" names of these parking lot lighting will be streets. If you have questions, installed after Adventure PreliminaryReport Due From Alleys construction. The p please call Tom Elgin at 481- plaza area is expected to be Consultant - 9/21/95 5581 ext. 744. completed mid-November. CIAC Meeting - 9/25/95 Carroll Middle School MAGUIRE THOMAS Gym/Rec Center- The floor CC Sets Public Hearing Date - ITEM TABLED has been laid and a final 10/3/95 Maguire Thomas has punch list will be developed Public Notice Appears in requested that Agenda Item next Thursday. The grand Newspaper - 10/4/95 No. 8A, which is the rezoning opening is scheduled for and concept plan for Solana's October 11, probably in the Public Hearing/First Reading residential and non-residential morning to allow the students of Ordinance - 11/7/95. projects, be tabled until the to participate. October 3 City Council Dove Road- Engineering Please call Shana Yelverton at meeting. Several Council plans are nearly complete; extension 705 if you have members are visiting questions about the progress Southlake's sister city and anticipate staff will request of the study. may not be able to make it authorization to bid at the first back for the meeting on Council meeting in October. Delegation Headed September 19. The applicant Neighborhood Sewer- Letters To Austin To Discuss wishes to have a full Council were sent to residents of the S.H. 114 when the item is heard. initial five neighborhoods the NOTE: The applicant is first week of September to A Southlake delegation will be requesting that the item be survey their willingness to going to Austin to appear tabled. Council may or may participate. Ten days were before the Texas not approve this request. allowed for responses. Staff Transportation Commission anticipates requesting bids by on September 28. The October 15. delegation will be submitting a STANDING petition to the Commission COMIVIITTEE White Chapel Blvd. - requesting funding for P improvements to S.H. 114. MEETING Completed. Please call Shana with 4 questions. Thursday, September 28 6:30 p.m. REC July 28, 1995 IEW37.: 1 Mr. Curtis Hawkestkile CITY SECRETAR Southlake City Manager 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 re: 1125 S. White Chapel Blvd. , surface drainage flow calculations Dear Mr. Hawkes: On two previous occasions, I have requested from you the surface drainage calculations across my South property line that were used to approve the Adam' s Addition perimeter brick wall. To date I have neither received those calculations nor notice from you that you cannot provide this information. As a resident of Southlake I am entitled to receive this information or the common courtesy of an explanation of your refusal to provide requested information. The dates of previous requests were 5-24-95 and certified request 6-14-95. Additionally, the city still has not required the wall drainage ports to be graded on the down side of my South (1,, property line so they can relieve some of the surface drainage. The elavation on the South side is still above the ports, thereby, making them useless . If you are not going to enforce Southlake' s drainage inspectors requirements, there is not much purpose or benefit to the residents for having a drainage engineer to inspect. With my situation, you merely charged a fee and allowed the developer to do as he pleases without regard for your requirements or the Texas Water Code. Another item of concern is the well-pump shed recently erected at the North center of Adam' s Addition. When I requested permission to build a gazebo in front of my house, I was required to pay $100 . 00 fee and get approval of the board of adjustments prior to construction. This requirement caused me a 45 day delay. Why has the city compromised on this item with the Adam' s Addition? In summarry, why is the city avoiding enforcing their drainage requirements, why am I being denied requested public information, t,, and why is there a double- standard for someone building one home compared to someone engaged in a multi- home project? certified # Z 093 016 493 Sincerely cc 1st Class Gart Mayor Fickes & Alan Padfield y g Joe Mast 2415 Taylor St. Southlake, TX 76092 July 17, 1995 Mayor Gary Fickes 108 Swallow Lane Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Fickes: I am writing you regarding city sewer service for Emerald Estates. At a recent retreat for council members, where sewer service was discussed, there were several important items discussed that are relevant to our situation in Emerald Estates. One of the items was whether sewer service should be provided for an entire subdivision if not all residents were in need of sewer service. The other item of importance dealt with the operation of septic systems in Southlake; do residents really need city sewer service or is their problem just improperly installed septic systems? In dealing with the issue of whether our septic systems were installed properly; I will address our system at 2415 Taylor Street, since this is one system with which I am thoroughly familiar. I was one of the first people to purchase property in Emerald Estates when the subdivision was being developed in 1984. At the very beginning, I became aware of my neighbors experiencing septic system problems during rainy periods or when guests were visiting. At first, I thought I must have been lucky to have had better soil because I was not experiencing the same septic problems my neighbors on both sides were experiencing. I was single at the time and because of my job, I was not at home much of the time, so I suspected that the reason I was not having problems was because my system was not being used as much. My suspicions were confirmed several years later when I too began to have problems. I then decided to have"perc" tests done at the same locations in my yard where the original"perc" tests had been performed when the property was deemed appropriate for septic systems. I had the soil tested during the dry part of the summer and the soil still didn't percolate well enough to pass the test for the correct operation of a septic system. I have since married, and the problems have worsened due to increased need and usage of water. We have spent over four thousand dollars to install an underground drainage system and to reshape our back yard to provide better drainage. We have had lateral lines added far beyond what is required by code and the results are still the same during rainy periods; we still cannot do our laundry and our toilets do not flush properly. The problem in our case at 2415 is not an improperly installed septic system, but an underlying layer of clay that doesn't allow the soil to absorb water or percolate well enough for a septic system to function properly during the rainy periods. A true test of proper soil is one that allows a septic system to function by soil percolation alone, all-year-round not just during dry periods. On the issue of who should be required to hook up, my concern deals with who makes this decision. Will it be the resident, the health department or the city inspectors? I am concerned about the potential health problem with septic systems that don't work all the time. I am also concerned about submerged pumps that many residents have installed to help alleviate their septic system problems. There are some residents who believe that their septic system is working properly if they are able to flush their toilet or their drains do not back up, regardless of what is actually happening outside in the yard. I know in some cases during the rainy periods and when the ground is saturated, the submerged pumps actually pump septic water to the surface because the septic water has no where else to go. During the rainy periods, a person can walk through our subdivision and smell the septic systems that are not working properly. We have a submerged pump in our system but it is for the aforementioned reasons that I leave it turned off. It is my opinion that if a septic system needs a submerged pump to keep toilets flushing and drains from backing up, then the system is not functioning properly, either because the system has not been installed properly or the soil does not percolate adequately. I believe the city needs to have a course of action to address the issue of septic systems that work only part of the time or work only with the aid of a submerged pump. There are some residents who will claim their system works fine most of the time and will be reluctant to spend the money to hook up to the city sewer system if the hook-up program is a voluntary one. There are several points I would like to make in closing. First, when we purchased our properties in Emerald Estates, we trusted that the developer, builders and inspectors had all done what was necessary to insure the development of a subdivision that would function properly. We assumed our septic systems would work. Second, the developer and builders did not plan and develop the subdivision for proper or adequate drainage. The difference in elevation between the houses and the bar ditches was inadequate and culverts were not positioned at the proper elevations when they were installed (some downstream culverts were actually installed at higher elevations than upstream culverts), resulting in standing water. The inadequate drainage allows surface water to stand longer than it should, allowing the soil to become saturated sooner than it otherwise would. However, solving our drainage problem will not completely remedy our septic system problems in Emerald Estates. Even the residents at the higher elevations of Taylor Street, that do not have standing water problems, have septic system problems because of the type of soil we have in Emerald Estates. Third, in view of the fact that the residents in Emerald Estates unknowingly purchased properties that do not function as properly designed, developed, installed and inspected properties should, I believe it is incumbent upon the city to help defray the costs of sewer service in Emerald Estates. I hope that when the time comes for the City Council to allocate funds and assess fees for the city sewer service, you will consider our situation in Emerald Estates. I urge you to work toward and vote in favor of a solution at the upcoming City Council sessions, to establish a participation fee for Emerald Estates residents at minimal cost. In addition to an assessment fee at minimal cost, I hope the Council will provide an extended period payment program for those residents who are not able to pay the fee in one lump sum. If you have any questions, please call me at 481-1405. Thank you. Sincerely, 7of Agog.erbm PAs) J 2-47-7- /2-/PA36Ifn 33e- 3 '7 114 Ate/ &iJ tAl 2 � - °C) : :4c G� f74-; s _ u ? n'U- 5 Z7--36 z�' _____Saw r :§,,....min •••ttiv '. • •'+ , 8 N_ — N N ^ M k0 .-. �0 a .i — 00 N �O 00 O O g 00 $ � ^y ~rii 00 M N M Qa V 1 O () ,O() a; O� M '� M N N V•1 a M •;? °', N r 1 A ‘ID 6 I� ..i In �0 �O 6iq I� 69 �D `. N .� N bq V1 t` bq VD VD 69 69 69 " 69 69 69 69 �•' 69 " 69 69 69 " 69 69 �'' 'a ER6R : ff:�'• A dos f . Van N N '.0 VD N to , , 00 '0 ,_� 00 ^ } 04 4 .0 ^ 00 ,,,\ M ^ 00 ^ M ^ In 0 , 0 p �--' p o0 p :vi'"R' N N 00 F. N [' M •-' 00 pN g 00 co 00 M co 0 M ''••.::�; O M oo N U [n - VI .., M .L, 00 a �t l- -- %esC M O M 06 F K' �O NO M Tr . Q tn .. 'n .. M .. �D ' ' 'd' .. N y9 v) .. '0 6q tel 6, in yq y •'., in in d9 if). 4 69 69 69 69 69 69 '' 69 69 �'' 69 ' 69 '' $i• 69 ER xL% ::i y ;f' -4 ,„,„...,„.„, ,:,„,...„„„„ ,..„:„„,:::.„:„..„,„„, W Iz, ,� pp 8O 00 eD ,1 r-' ,1 M I- ^ 00 ,.., .O ^ 00 f b .--i U o0 p 8,,� O ^ 00 ^ O, M .� N ^ •-• O O In . 00 ^ ,:k •�`!v O M M O� Z '~ V•1 O t0 cd c0 00 8 "' of N in O M M cd .a en as 00 00 I� ---' 0 .--4 en R M M i '•4gv:••::: M M Q 'ct M M �,,, O o0 00 a .. W N 69 in - '0 ' V1 ' VI 69 N 69 10 VD bq I� 4, 69 It .� i :i�• ,: ,:• V0 V0 4, EA r � 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 •::; ;r2.,, , d9 EA NOP %f + - i-. g �O -o ^ N �-. N �O ,� ,•� 0 ,� pp :. ''''"'`' © N M p O .-. .-. R ,.•. O g O M ^ 8 O § O 00 �n p i{. O rl 3 I in ► in *� cd in O O V �y �n O to s O ,n %:•• C e'? O 4 M ' ~ U N U 00 -a V .:I- v1 -a .-, M .r 'ct M M N �`••::::: 00 I R � g � 69 '0 `. in `. 'O '. �p 69 69 'n '. N 69 69 69 6R • �4Pw < 69 cA tt�� 69 " EI9 69 69 �'' 69 ''' 69 69 " 69 '''' 69 " 69 d9 4, �1 69 �•.' :.• f.• :' 6J1 `•:tI .k:. ON �O :f :: 00 t� '•", c0 00 c� '-' ON in 8 co 0O h O .� c� 'Cr y1 O^ N rl N U o. U �o o� ' v �* Z M �o a 16 v .-r e i v d' '.p .� c0 ... '0 ... N 69 N 69 '.0 69 N 69 1--- (A. N N d9 4, 69 69 69 to '' 69 '' 69 '' 69 69 }' 69 69 0. r 1� r. ^ r. r.00 ^ r. • ti :r. Eil v N pp O� .. NN oo cn ct a`.:::to oo co .4A e) ' f i00 O � N te A O '' . p 00 - Or :I: :::::,..„,:::::„::::!:4 ....: . .. . m D\ l0 ' :70ke 00 00 in O, ,::: 00 00 in 69 ii N ^ .•-. O ^ �O ^ 00 .-. o .-. S 0p0 N_ . :ii d9 F/4 O ^ vl pQ I� V1 O kM1..•. 6 -8 68 V1 �,, O NS 00S � M «�f �a22' U O 69 N 69 0000 69 00 .r", 0000 69 '~-. 69 Q 0000 69 00 V N `�� 0000 69 'k. r;�r .•: 69 69 69 69 69 5 69 69 69 69 :Y k.'R::::: w 69 U z �hk1Y�..• ;II:M.. d a� p :f : C b0 U C V .�.� VIi i," it 'L7 = •'::' f:'• = g 5 m g g = 0) i. i .. a) U ^° ° W ee R ° ° ° ►= `.'}r' ke4 Qom'd 14 U U W �i fji Evc• \icm w w. to k`r : 7F 1 L O Q N ON NI M M V 1 O ko 00 r- V) 4 E cn U M U a N O a c O a f,,, ci a .--7 M t �, •'•wy •{: �O [: M M U w �h �O .� tn •c- .� N ... .� •tf ..., 'Cr M 69 •d• �r,,M�: V EA H4 0 69 69 4, 4, 4, 49 69 E9 69 69 Si ";'tN„:: EA 69 iirfAtini ingei 04 $ +}f a0 00 VD VD VD :;:81, Fes: MO,in OS � .•., c" Q cn cn ... MO .� �• g �i7•....1. ,p a a a ._ M a .... M a N a ao :a�s% v M 69 69 �D v N et} V 1 v V1 6g v V) 6R in ER 69 Qy 69 ...i 69 v 69 69 ..i 69 69 v 69 ER ..i :JF't1 <: 69 ER Piniiiiiiii tit:'\'y{ Ix .D N CA M l� N ':�`:::':: l's 00 M M N N l• M N .f,iF : EA cd A M «f ca l� 00 ✓�ii .� [� ' 00' N ' ' � �_' M M a a My a My M -a cv My a N --a M7. / : . viiii �y 69 EH 69 69 64 6R 69 %<z�f.•..•,,� d9 6R tis:;•s • N f:: 0 vs a Nitid a a a a N c. a cd a a cl a a •'; iq: c c c c ii; iiiiiirAiggi NI :ii:ifii:i:iaig:i Iiiigieni O W oN «.: 0 elV1. cc V?0000 Tr O N A G. M cd ,s4 ,D Iv a V z Ma hU a -aM Ma ga vs a a O a la • O oo en en 69 64 6/3 69 �"' 69 ..i 6969 69 69 1; iii EA 69 �-' :,.. IVO 0o O• in ,� 00 .-. "ii• : .. N to P O in v, cgs oo ct cc: r- co v_ ez S cv ca ca ^' n $., cn • 69 " 69 69 69 69 " :• • 4, 69 0 li:IV:igiIk fi9. EA 00 ct :.\., w N City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 5. 1995 LOCATION: 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M. 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to order. Invocation. 2. A. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. RECONVENE: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on August 1, 1995 and the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on August 15 and continued to August 22, 1995 and the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on August 28, 1995. 4. Reports: A. Mayor's Report. B. City Manager's Report. C. SPIN Report CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Council member or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. caw 5. Consider: A. Permit renewal request for Cub Scout Pack #507 to operate a BB Gun Shooting Range. City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 5, 1995 Page 2 B. Authorizing the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement for the Teen Court Program with City of Grapevine, City of Colleyville, City of Southlake, Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District, and the Carroll Independent School District. C. Award of bid for construction of a sanitary sewer line to N. Davis Business Park. REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum. 7. Ordinances, second readings, public hearings, and related items. A. Ordinance No. 642, 2nd reading, an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 216 and a portion of Ordinance No. 118, relating to the establishment of speed limits on certain streets and roadways within the City of Southlake by revising the speed limits on a portion of F.M. 1938 (Davis Blvd.) and South White Chapel Blvd. , and establishing school crossing zones and specifying time when reduced speed limit applies to school crossing zones. Public Hearing. B. Ordinance No. 647, 2nd reading, Fixing and Levying Municipal Ad Valorem Taxes for FY1995-96. Public Hearing. C. Ordinance No. 648, 2nd reading, adopting Fiscal Year 1995-96 Annual Budget and revising Fiscal Year 1994-95 Annual Budget. Public Hearing. D. Resolution No. 95-34, Revision to fee schedule. E. Ordinance No. 649, 2nd reading, establishing Administrative Departments. Public Hearing. 8. Ordinances, first readings, and related items. A. Ordinance No. 480-179 (ZA 95-73), 1st Reading, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Residential), being 199.2 acres situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A5, 2A7, the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 1, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E1, 1F, 1F1, 1G, 1H, 1J1, 3A, 3A1, 3A1A, 3A1A1, 3A1A2, 3A2, 3A3, 3A3A, 3A3A1, 3A4, 3A4A, 3A4B, 3C, 4A, 4A1, 4B, 4B1, 4B2, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1, and includes all of Lot 4, Block A, MTP-IBM Addition No. 1 as recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68, P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G, Slide 208, City of South lake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 5, 1995 Page 3 P.R.D.C.T. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (SH 114). East of East T.W. King Road. North of West Dove St.. and West of North White Chapel Blvd. Current Zoning: C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District; Requested Zoning: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture; Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #2. B. ZA 95-76, Preliminary Plat for Village Center, Lots 1-6, Block 1, and Lots 1-7, Block 2, being 44.328 acres situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049 and being a portion of Tract 6 and also being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat of Farrar Addition and all of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Farrar Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1539, P.R.T.C.T. Location: South And adjacent to East Northwest Parkway (SH 114) and North and adjacent to East Southlake Blvd. (FM 17091. approximately 1000' West of Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "C-3" Commercial District. Owner: James Farrar, et. al.; Applicant: The Midland Development Group. SPIN Neighborhood #4. C. ZA 95-80, Preliminary Plat for Cambridge Place Addition, being 89.744 acres situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, Tract 2, and the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tracts 6A, 6A1, 6B, and 6B1. Location: North of East Continental Blvd. And West of S. Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential. Owners: Clifford Wayne Hood and Glenda Sue Hood, Nolan Lemons and Malacha A. Lemons, Billie Farrar Trustee, Southlake Joint Venture; Applicant: Terra Land Development. SPIN Neighborhood #8. D. ZA 95-81, Plat Revision of Lots 6R and 7R, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I, being a revision of Lots 6 and 7, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I as shown on the Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1328, P.R.T.C.T. and 0.064 acres of Tract 1B situated in the B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519 for a total of 0.833 acres. Location: 302 and 304 Quail Court Northwest of the intersection of Redwing Drive and North Peytonville Ave. Current Zoning: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owners: The estate of Audrey L. Stone, deceased; the Estate of A.C. Stone, deceased; Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc., William Byrne and Monica Waite; Applicant: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #13. E. Plat Showing, ZA 95-70, for Lots 1, 2, and 3, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, being 3.351 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, Tract 2B. Location: 1800' west of N. Peytonville Ave.. 350' east of Randol Mill Ave.. and on the north side of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner/Applicant: DKV (Sutton) Partners II L.P., Drews Realty Group, General Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #13. City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 5, 1995 Page 4 9. Resolutions: A. Resolution No. 95-35, clarifying the Southlake Park, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan for the Texas Recreation and Parks Account Program of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. B. Resolution No. 95-36, Appointments to a Committee to study the feasibility of splitting the Planning and Zoning Commission. 10. Other Items for Consideration: A. Developers Agreement for Lakes of La Paloma Estates B. Special Commercial Developer Agreement for McDonald's Corporation at the southeast corner of SH 114 and Kimball Ave. C. Request for sign variance for Bank United at 1460 W. Southlake Blvd. D. Accept or Reject Bids with Permission to re-advertise - Summerplace Drainage Channel Improvements E. City. of Southlake petition with TxDOT for the SH 114 reconstruction project. F. Appointment of Director of Parks and Recreation 11. Other Items for Discussion. A. Planning and Zoning Commission request for relief from Resolution No. 95-24 relating to limiting cases. B. Zoning Ordinance provision pertaining to small-type Satellite Dishes 12. Meeting Adjourned. L City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 5, 1995 Page 5 CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas, on Friday, September 1, 1995, at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. wituua wi OVT HCA�� tit Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary * If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 ext. 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. C:\W P51\MIN-AGN\CC950905.REG/kb City of Southlake,Texas EXECUTIVE SESSION PENDING LITIGATION-SECTION 551.071 The City Council may consider pending and contemplated litigation subjects. The following subjects may be discussed: 1. Legend Custom Homes. 1993 2. VW Investments, Inc. and Frost Fuels Corporation, dba Southlake Fuels vs. City of Southlake, Texas, Curtis E. Hawk, Karen P. Gandy, and the Southlake Board of Adjustments. 1994 3. Aledo Construction. 1994 4. Walters Claim. 1995 5. Gary H. Hargett and Sherry D. Hargett vs. Ralph V. Williams, Warren Hagan, and the City of Southlake. 1995 Litigation is, by nature, an on-going process, and questions may arise as to trial tactics which need ' to be explained to the City Council. Upon occasions, the City Council may need information • from the City Attorney as to the status of the pending or contemplated litigation subjects set out above. After discussion of the pending and contemplated litigation subjects in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in open session. LAND ACQUISITION-SECTION 551.072 tor -The City Council may consider the purchase, exchange, lease, or sale of real property. After discussion of land acquisitions in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in open session. PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.074 The City Council may consider the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City Board and Commission Members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office. I)EPI.OYMFNT OF SECURITY PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.076 Regarding the deployment or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open session by the City Council. If personnel issues or litigation issues arise, or a need to seek advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting, an executive session will be held. City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Personnel Figures Attached are a sampling of area cities Firefighters and Police personnel. We must be cautious of making pure numerical comparisons between these, or any other cities, because of the vast diversities that dictate calls for service such as social, cultural, and businesses to citizen population ratios. For example, cities such as Hurst(population 35,000) must staff for its total calls for service. During normal business hours, cities may have a quarter of a million people inside their city limits in their offices, businesses and malls, which greatly increase the demand for service and equates to more personnel. Other factors involved in comparing pure numbers are types of service delivery, multi-story areas, cities with poor fire codes (example - allowing untreated wood shingle roofing), the elderly population, the intersections and their directions as they link up to main thoroughfares within a particular community, high service call areas, and probably the most debilitating factor in cost analysis is tradition. There are some known facts about Police, Fire and EMS service that are, however, consistent city to city. Structural fire calls continue to decline because of better building and fire codes, coupled with regular inspections and enforcement. EMS calls for service continue to increase partially because of expectations of the community, along with a city's tendency to shift in the age of the population, and society's propensity for violence and bad driving. Police calls have and will continue to increase at a rate directly related to its populous and social dictations, or lack thereof. In 1990 the Southlake City Government chose not to follow other cities traditional wasteful expenditures in public safety. They did dictate that the public safety service delivery be efficient, economical and most of all, effective. Given that charge, we have demonstrated an exemplary service delivery in Police, Fire and EMS, while building a group of Public Safety Officers cross- trained in both disciplines to respond in any area as needed, reducing our personnel costs to be shared with the City. The station placement report that was given during the Retreat is another example of prudent and practical planning to provide service to the community with an effective work force that will be a constant in the City, as opposed to a paid work force with constant down time. I'm avail ble for any comments or questions concerning this issue. BC/bls • FIREFIGHTERS BY CITY AS OF AUGUST 16, 1995 L CITY NO OF FF POPULATION SQ. MILES PER CAPITA KELLER 26 16500 18.5 1.6 COLONY 19 24133 12 0.8 GRAPEVINE 57 34000 23 1.7 COLLEYVILLE 21 16000 12.5 1.3 FLOWER MOUND 28 30000 34.5 0.9 HIGHLAND PARK *48 DPS 8940 2.5 5.4 HURST 34 35500 10.2 1 EULESS 42 40000 1.1 WATAUGA **25 DPS 21000 5 1.2 SOUTHLAKE 16 12500 23 1.3 #21 DPS 1.6 *Highland park has a total of 48 personnel. 48 are cross-trained police and fire. **Watauga has a total of 26 personnel. 25 are cross-trained police and fire. # Southlake has 5 cross- trained public safety officers. L POLICE OFFICERS BY CITY AS OF AUGUST 16, 1995 L CITY NO OF PO POPULATION SQ. MILES PER CAPITA KELLER 27 16500 18.5 1.6 COLONY 31 24133 12 1.3 GRAPEVINE 59 34000 23 1.7 COLLEYVILLE 24 16000 12.5 1.5 FLOWER MOUND 44 30000 34.5 1.5 HIGHLAND PARK *48 DPS 8940 2.5 5.4 HURST 59 35500 10.2 1.7 EULESS 59 40000 1.5 WATAUGA • **26 DPS 21000 5 1.2 SOUTHLAKE 18 12500 23 1.6 #23 DPS 1.8 *Highland park has a total of 48 personnel. 48 are cross-trained police and fire. **Watauga has a total of 26 personnel. 25 are cross-trained police and fire. # Southlake has 5 cross- trained public safety officers. L City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 22, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Excerpts from Personnel Study and Departmental Indicators Attached are three excerpts from the Personnel Study. Also attached for your-information are Indicators for each of the three divisions. If you have any questions, please call. BC/bls Attachments • L SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RATIOS for COMMUNICATIONS EXPLANATION OF DATA Each tour of duty is listed in accordance with shift rotation dates . For instance, the 1st Tour runs from 04-01-94 through 05-21-94 . Under each tour date is a listing of the number of days in that particular tour (the tours are unbalanced in the number of days in each since this study is from April through the following March instead of January through December) . Under each tour is a column of figures representing a ratio of the number of personnel-to number of days . That is , during this tour, how many days did the shift operate with a specific number of communicators? For example , during the first tour, "1" Shift worked 38 days with 1 communicator on 411. duty . 13 days with 1 . 5 communicators on duty . . . and, 0 days with 2 on duty . A listing of . 5 communicators indicates one- half shift worked. This would be the case for a "power shift" or an communicator working for only one-half of his/her shift . A ratio is then listed in the total position of each column. This ratio represents the number of days in that tour -to- the number of communicators on duty for that number of days . For example, "1" Shift worked 51 days in the 1st Tour . There is a count of 57 . 5 communicators present during that time. The "Average" listed directly under each column represents the average number of personnel working per day of that tour . This figure is determined by dividing the number of on-duty communicators by the number of days in the Tour . In continuing to use "1" Shift as an example, divide 57 . 5 (communicators) by 51 (days in the Tour) for the average: 1 . 12 . A yearly average is then listed. This figure is obtained by adding the four tour averages and dividing by four (the number of tours) . Utilizing these formulas , the yearly average for each of the three shifts for 1994/1995 are as follows : 1 SHIFT: 2 SHIFT: 3 SHIFT : 1 . 37 1 . 30 1 . 02 L SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RATIOS for POLICE SERVICES EXPLANATION OF DATA Each tour of duty is listed in accordance with shift rotation dates . For instance , the 1st Tour runs from 04-01-94 through 05-21-94 . Under each tour date is a listing of the number of •days in that particular tour . (The tours are uneven in the number of days since this survey runs from April through the following March instead of January through December) . Under each tour is a column of figures representing a ratio of people-to-days . This ratio answers "How many days did the shift operate with a specific number of officers?" For example; during the first tour , "1" Shift worked 3 days with 2 people on duty . . . 0 days with 2 . 5 people . . . and, 14 days with 3 people on duty . . . etc . A listing of . 5 officers indicates one-half shift worked. This would be the case for a "power shift" or an officer working for only one-half of his/her shift for whatever reason. A ratio is then listed in the total position of each column. This ratio represents the number of days in that tour -to- the number of people on duty for that number of days . For example, "1" Shift worked 51 days in the 1st Tour . There is a count of 191 people present during that time . The "Average" listed directly under each column represents the average number of people working per day of that tour. This figure is determined by dividing the number of people present by the number of days in the tour . In continuing to use "1" Shift as an example, divide 191 (people) by 51 days in the tour) for the average: 3 . 75 . A yearly average is then listed. This figure is obtained by adding the four tour averages and dividing by four (the number of tours ) . Utilizing these formulas , the average number of persons working on each shift for 94-95 are as follows : 1 SHIFT: 3.57 2 SHIFT: 2 . 67 SOUTHLAKE DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RATIOS for FIRE SERVICES April 1, ' 94 / March 31, ' 95 Number of Days to Number of Officers Ratio "A" SHIFT "B" SHIFT "C" SHIFT FEBRUARY ' 95 : 2 : 2 : 2 . 2 . 5 : 2 . 5 : 2 . 5 4 : 3 1 : 3 5 : 3 3 : 3 . 5 3 : 3 . 5 : 3 . 5 1 : 4 5 : 4 4 : 4 . 4 . 5 : 4 . 5 : 4 . 5 2 : 5 : 5 : 5 MARCH ' 95 : 2 : 2 5 : 2 • . 2 . 5 : 2 . 5 : 2 . 5 : 3 1 : 3 5 : 3 2 : 3 . 5 3 : 3 . 5 : 3 . 5 4 : 4 5 : 4 : 4 4 : 4 . 5 2 : 4 . 5 : 4 . 5 : 5 : 5 : 5 YEARLY TOTALS: 1 : 2 0 : 2 5 : 2 0 : 2 . 5 3 : 2 . 5 3 : 2 . 5 50 : 3 31 : 3 52 : 3 10 : 3 . 5 32 : 3 . 5 7 : 3 . 5 41 : 4 37 : 4 55 : 4 5 : 4 . 5 19 : 4 . 5 0 : 4 . 5 3 : 5 0 : 5 0 : 5 YEARLY AVERAGE: L 3. 51 3 . 65 3 . 42 City of Southlake DIVISION SUMMARY Fund Department Division 100 General 130 Public Safety 132 Police Services Purpose: The Police Services Division is charged with protecting life and property of the citizens of Southlake, and with preserving public order. The Division is responsible for enforcement of Federal, State and local municipal laws within its area of jurisdiction. Functions of the Division include general patrol and responding to calls for service;the investigation of traffic accidents, issuing citations for violations, of operations of the municipal holdover facility. The Police Services Division also includes a Police Reserve force, composed of trained volunteers functioning under the supervision of the Deputy Director of Police Services. 1995-96 Budget Highlights: The 1995-96 budget provides allocations of funds for four(4) additional officers. Consisting of 1 traffic officer, 1 police officer, and 2 PSO's. A traffic motorcycle and accessories at $29,530; vehicle warranties $13,475; vehicle video camera's and recorders at $18,000. INDICATORS OF SERVICE ACTIVITY ACTUAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Alarm Calls 1921 2187 2471 Traffic Accidents (Total) 281 311 351 Traffic Accidents (Major) 97 107 120 Traffic Accidents (Minor) 184 204 230 Citations Issued 9255 10352 11697 Offense/Incident Reports 978 1271 1436 Arrests 467 553 624 Part I Crimes 264 364 411 Burglaries 63 82 93 Cases Assigned to Investigators 470 550 622 Cases Cleared (Percent) 60 65 70 Crime Prevention Surveys/Present 34 45 56 L City of Southlake DIVISION SUMMARY Fund Department Division 100 General 130 Public Safety 131 Fire Services Purpose: The Fire Services Division is responsible for the protection of lives and property by developing fire prevention and emergency response programs to safeguard against the effects of fire and other emergency situations. The Division provides emergency fire suppression, emergency rescue, and emergency medical and trauma care and related patient transportation. In addition, the Division is responsible for providing in-service inspection, pre-fire planning, public education programs and fire hydrant maintenance; the enforcement of fire codes and all City ordinances related to the protection of life and property from fire and explosion; and conducting investigations to determine the origin and cause of fire and explosions. The Fire Services Division also includes a Fire Reserve force, composed of trained volunteers functioning under the supervision of the Deputy Director of Fire Services. 1995-96 Budget Highlights: The 1995-96 budget provides allocations of funds for 1 additional firefighter. Also included is $105,000 for a new ambulance; $19,500 for the replacement of the utility truck; two defibulators for the PSO cars at $7,400; $2,750 for a cascade air system; $10,700 for a rescue tool. INDICATORS OF SERVICE ACTIVITY ACTUAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Structures Protected 3420 3800 4211 Businesses With Hazardous Material 61 70 78 Calls for Service (Fire Suppress) 540 781 855 Calls for Service(Emerg. Medical) 385 430 483 Fires Investgated by Fire Marshall 12 15 17 Fire Prevention Classes (#people) 3876 4200 5000 Plans Reviewed 26 210 275 High Grass/Weeds 77 240 275 City of Southlake DIVISION SUMMARY Fund Department Division 100 General 130 Public Safety 133 Support Services Purpose: Public Safety Support is responsible for the dispatching and other communication activities in support of fire and police operations. This Division is also responsible for record keeping and . other administrative and clerical activities supporting the Fire and Police Services Divisions including the departments finance, training, and internal affairs. It is under the supervision of the Deputy Director of Support Services. 1995-96 Budget Highlights: The 1995-96 budget provides allocations of$53,000 for a new data processing system. The present provider filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy in March of this year. Budget funding of$26,000 is included for the acquisition of ten lap top computers. They are to be utilized by field personnel in the gathering of report data thus reduces the copious data that must be re-entered by the support services personnel. The budget also allocates two additional Communications Specialists to handle the increasing demands of the 9-1-1 center. A Special Services Officer (DARE) is also allocated to this budget. The Special Services Officer is funded in part by the Carrol I.S.D. INDICATORS OF SERVICE ACTIVITY ACTUAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Offense/Incident Reports Processed 978 1271 1436 Arrest Reports Processed 467 553 624 Citations Processed 9255 10352 11697 Compiled Reports Generated 280 364 411 % DPS Records Computerized 95 99 100 D.A.R.E. students taught 2309 3000 3785 L City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Wide Area Network Proposal from CISD The CISD presented at the August 16 City Council budget work session a proposal to participate in their wide area network (WAN) through GTE. The proposal was reviewed by the City's contracted information systems consultant, LeBlanc & Associates. According to their review, the primary limitation to this proposal is the City's cost participation for the benefit derived. The proposal lists a per month charge of$487.50 per site. Southlake currently has two sites, City Hall and the Park building (three counting the Economic Development Division at the Chamber offices). Recurring annual costs for the two sites would be $11,700. One time costs include installation of $3,500 (per site), plus $5,000 (up to $10,000) per site for preparation. This one time cost could range from $17,000 to $27,000. Analysis of Benefits. One benefit listed in the proposal from CISD is shared Internet access. Currently the City is exploring Internet options, most of which are considerably less expensive. Another benefit is shared E-Mail. The City does not have E-Mail now, but will most likely have it within the next year or so, providing E-Mail access to all City employees connected to our network. Shared E-Mail among City and CISD employees could be achieved via dial-in access to either system. Shared servers could reduce the City's file/mail server costs by some amount depending on the cost allocation of the servers. Access to CISD CD-ROM services would be available, however, it is unknown at this time what information they would have via CD-ROM that would be of benefit to the City. The WAN technology would make video-conferencing available. This is a service that may benefit the City in the future, yet immediate benefits are unknown. Dial-up network access would be available to the City when the City implements its own internal network. An alternative to the CISD proposal would be to deploy a dedicated RF link between City Hall and the Park building for$12,000 (one time cost). This would operate at a slower speed than the proposed WAN link, but it would provide the City with the ability to share computer resources. All of the costs associated with the wiring located within City buildings would be the same whether the City uses the WAN or RF link to connect the two building. Some cities have, as part of their cable franchise negotiations, been able to obtain fiber optic lines installed to city facilities at nominal cost. I realize this option may not be available to the City for some time, however it is a possibility in the near future. City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 25, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Long Distance Billing • Attached is a memo to me from Deputy Director Gregg regarding his meeting with the Account Executive from AT&T regarding the City of Southlake's long distance billing, and the exploration of merging Southlake and Carroll I.S.D. long distance billing service. A basic synopsis is there may be an opportunity to save some money, however, a consolidatation will not create any savings. 4o, BC/bls Attachment • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 22, 1995 TO: Billy Campbell, Director, Public Safety FROM: Gary Gregg, Deputy Director, Police Services SUBJECT: Investigation of Long Distance Billing I met today with Zachary K. Hawkins, Account Executive, AT&T regarding the billing of the. City of Southlake's long distance service. This meeting was to serve two purposes: 1. Secure any additional savings in long distance costs that might be available to the city . . 2. Explore any savings that might be available by combining the purchasing power of Carroll ISD with the City's long distance service. A survey of our billing for long distance revealed that our average long distance is in the range of$250.00 month with a one month high of about $325. AT&T discounts are packaged in several plans but the most advantageous one is Custom Net. Custom Net allows a business with multiple locations to combine all the long distance billing on a single bill, making the costs easier to track and aggregating all purchases to qualify for the best discount. Custom Net provides a 10% discount monthly for amounts up to $1,000.00 and 15% for $ 1,001.00 to $5,000.00. Based on our monthly billing we receive the 10% discount. Under this plan, long distance calls have a thirty second minimum billing and 1 second billing after thirty seconds. We can reap the following additional savings if the City is willing to sign a two year contract with AT&T. Flex Plan discount 5.0% * based on term rate and monthly billing Competitive Discount 8.0% * they know we will shop around Prof. Business Assoc. 5.0% * association with Chamber of Commerce These percentages are based on an average monthly bill of$250.00. Our additional discounts for last months bill of$252.68 would total an additional $45.47 for a total long distance savings of$70.73. Memo to Director Billy Campbell Investigation of Long Distance Billing August 22, 1995 Page 2 I explored the option of combining the billing for CISD and the City of Southlake. CISD is not on the same rate plan with AT&T that we are and receives no volume discount. Their calls are billed on a six second increment after a thirty second minimum. The AT&T figures show that current CISD billing is about the same as ours, ($250 - $260) per month. Combining the billing together will not meet the Volume Discount threshold of $1,000.00 per month, so no savings would be reaped there. By combining the amounts together, the Flex plan discount on the combined total would increase by 1%. Thus $7,200.00 a year total combined billing would result in a $72.00 dollar savings but with one organization having to split out the bill and the other housekeeping chores that would go with a joint billing operation. CISD can realize a savings about the same as ours by enrolling in Custom Net and receive all the same discounts the City qualifies for. The answer to question 1 posed earlier is, yes, there are additional discounts available to the City of Southlake if the City is willing to sign a two year commitment with AT&T. To question 2, yes, a savings of about $72.00 best case scenario, all other discounts in place and combining both CISD and City of Southlake billing. I have attached a Flex Plan contract along with other supporting information for forwarding to the City Manager. I would recommend that we sign the service agreement and begin saving an additional $545.00 per year. I am available if you have any further questions. GG/gg 61.:C:m..orWm.mo\nemo226Mp. L • ATT' L Welcome to the AT&T CustomNetam Service FlexPlan Benefits You'll receive an additional 3.0%-11.0% discount on eligible usage, before all other AT&T CustomNec Service discounts are applied.Eligible usage includes direct dialed AT&T intrastate,interstate and most international calls— plus interstate, intrastate, international AT&T Corporate Calling Card calls, intrastate, interstate, and Canadian 800 service calls, ALLIANCE teleconference, and USA Direct calls. Tenn Extension provisions help you deal with unforeseen circumstances that could prevent you from meeting your commitment. How To Join Simply select the tern that corresponds to your monthly calling volume.Then,please sign this agreement and return it to your AT&T Account Representative.Then you can begin receiving additional savings with the AT&T CustomNet FlexPlan in your next full billing cycle. Thanks for selecting the CustomNec FlexPlan! We are proud CO have you as a FlexPlan customer. Term of Contract: 12 Month X( 24 Month 36 Month Monthly Usage Commitment Level: • $50.00 )( $100.00 $250.00 $500.00 $1000.00 $1500.00 $2000.00 $3000.00 $4000.00 t) FzEx ?. OatQ cAa �- 6l�- = fi 8 % fi4&tjj 7,14 Your sis a:ure acknowledges that you understand and accept the terms and conditions for the CustomNet FlexPlan outlined on the attached page AND T1LtT YOU ARE DULY AU—MORI==n TO MAiG,r-HE COMMITNiENT AND TO ORDER SERVICE FOR EACH OF THESE LOCATIONS. 0l7 l) 71 `tool AT&T Account Number fii„wk„) Cuscother &T Accepte By. . eft Authorized Customer Signature Title c s Typed or Primed Name Typed or Printed tiame Dace Date L AT&T 3195 Page 1 IF 12702 4- NO Val 1oo �` i - ( A (10 N & W'e— 1 (1,AN4- ( qL AMC' l' - _NISH CustomNet Service One Plan,One Discount,One Bill ume discounts.You get the advantages of AT&T AT'A GLANCE • quality —like the fastest connect time and the best A call completion race in the industry. In addition, • you can receive your 800 calls from anywhere in Save time, save money — here's how: •, the U.S.' and Canada. We even help you generate more calls from current and potential customers • Includes virtually all the calls your . with a standard listing in our business makes — including long business or consumer toll-free:. distance, 800, and international calls . national directories. . What's more, we offer a • All your company locations choice of.backup services. For i virtually any service disruption, 1.45:11 • And combines them all on one we'll put you back in touch bill for one volume discount with your customers within 5 minutes, once we r •. _ confirm your choice. 800 service customers get this protection for free and it's guaranteed.: AT&T CustomNet Service combines virtually all the calls your business makes into one convenient Discounts that add value bill, for one volume discount. Your AT&T Custom_vet Service includes the fol- lowing discounts: One plan,one bill AT&T CusosuNct Service lets you combine all of 0% discount on calls made between any of the following direct-dialed AT&T calls: your company's Cuscom.Net locations. • Long distance —domestic or international ()10% volume discount, starting at dollar one, 800 services — U.S.' and Canada for your net usage when your bill is over • Calling Card S25 per month, and 15% volume discount, • AT&T USADirccr° starting at dollar one, for your net usage Service when your bill is over 51,000 per month, up • AT&T' Teleconferencing co 5 5,000 • Residential • 3% co 11% optional discounts when you • Fax/data transmissionsNEI make a 12, 24, or 36 month commitment co our AT&T FlcxPlana Option. 800 ways to make tf you're a member of an association, you may be your phones work harrier eligible for additional discounts with the AT&T Profit Including AT&T 800 Service in CustoniNct lets you By Association program. Check with your associa- turn your phones into a profit center while com- don co see if they participate in this program. bining 800 calls with ocher usage for bigger vol- IIF rarco cues*Tit:*c-O3/9S :`•• • - AT&T CustomNet Worksheet Outbound Direct Dia( Intrastate Minutes X .198* (Texas Rate) S Interstate Minutes X .312" (Avg.Rate/Min.) = S Inbound 800 Intrastate Minutes X .204* (Texas Rate) = S Interstate Minutes X .300"' (Avg.Rate/Mtn.) = S 'Ail Rates are Type i/PEAK rates. "Represents the AVERAGE rate per minute. Gross Monthly Usage: $ Intra-Company Discount - 20% $ 'applied to all colts between company locations Top Intl Country Discount- 20% (GBA) $ 'applied to most frequently called COUNTRY or Top Intl Country Discount- 10% (FNO) 'applied to the 2 most frequently called COUNTRIES Subtotal of Usage AFTER above discounts: $ -5T=V'6 8 Volume Discounts I!) '5 U 'applied to subtotal AFTER In Pp tra-Company and Country Discounts. � �� Up to $1000 10% $ � From $1001 to $5000 15% $ 'Usage greater than S5000 Is not •• eligible for Volume Discounts. "THIS IS NOT A STEP LEVEL DISCOUNT Applicable discount Is back to dollar one. FlexPlan Discount - 3% to 11% 'applied to Gross Usage "Usage grater than$5000 Is not eligible for Terre Plan Discounts 0 CAO Discount (Compettbr Bid/Proposal Required) $ " a f 'applied to Gross Usage PBA - 5% (MUST be affiliated with an AT&T assoc.) $ 102 ' b 3 'applied to Gross Usage Total Long Distance Cost $ v' s Global Contacts Savings S 'Intl User Bonus Program for Intl bddng>S200 Total Savings $ / 4/5/95 DEPT Person Pager # Vendor IO2 P CtrS it IN BARLOW, KATE 824-2069 McCaw IN BRADLEY, JUDGE 824-0272 McCaw ADMIN CANSLER, DANNY 824-0271 McCaw ADMIN Farrell, Kathleen 824-9849 McCaw ADMIN HUGMAN, KEVIN 824-2073 McCaw ADMIN LeGRAND, SANDY 824-2071 McCaw ADMIN MAYOR FICKES 824-2070 McCaw Admin Pam Mueller r" 824-1555 AT&t ADMIN RICE, SHANA 824-2072 McCaw ADMIN RICHARME, MIKE / 824-9541 McCaw COMMUNICATIONS FOSTER,JODI 824-6703 ATT COMMUNICATIONS GARZA, BELINDA 824-7319 ATT COMMUNICATIONS 824-7619 ATT COMMUNICATIONS NORWOOD, FRANKIE 824-9653 ATT COMMUNICATIONS PAYNE,LAURIE 824-7213 ATT COMMUNICATIONS SEXTON, BARBARA 824-7081 ATT COMMUNICATIONS TRYON,THERESA 824-7624 ATT Engineering Poe, Shawn 824-0960 McCaw FIRE BARNES, DAVID 824-1225 McCaw FIRE BEDRICH, MIKE 824-9736 McCaw FIRE BLACK, RICK 824-1170 McCaw FIRE DIR CAMPBELL 824-2050 McCaw FIRE DIR WILLIAMS 824-2048 McCaw FIRE FINN, BOB 824-2068 McCaw fire Fire Grp Call 824-0050 McCaw IRE FRUCI, MIKE 824-0999 McCaw HAWK, CURTIS 824-2045 McCaw ,IIICE HOLLIS, RICHARD 824-1170 McCaw FIRE HORNICK, KEVIN 824-9749 McCaw FIRE LAW, D.L. 824-2053 McCaw FIRE LEONARD, KENDALL 824-1171 McCaw FIRE LORIMER, RYAN 824-1645 McCaw FIRE MINDER, DENNIS 824-1226 McCaw FIRE PARKER, LT. 824-2059 McCaw FIRE ROBINSON, JUSTIN 824-9638 McCaw FIRE SCARMARDO, MIKE 824-9746 McCaw FIRE STEWART, ROGER 824-2049 McCaw FIRE TESTERMAN, RONEY 824-2057 McCaw FIRE TRAVER, GARY 824-1169 McCaw FIRE WILSON, CPT GARLAND 824-2052 McCaw FIRE WINDROW, DAVID 824-1168 McCaw PARKS , lank/451Shelly824-1785 McCaw [ PARKS McADAMS, KIM 824-2058 McCaw PARKS TAYLOR, GARY 824-1176 McCaw POLICE Anderson, Richard 824-7193 AT&t POLICE BLACK, BRAD 824-9689 McCaw POLICE BROWN, BEN 824-4629 ATT POLICE DANIELS, SGT 824-1637 McCaw POLICE DARE OFC 824-9770 McCaw Police Foster, Charlie 824-7946 AT&t POLICE GREGG, LT. GARY 824-1211 McCaw ^SLICE HINKLE, SGT B. 824-1755 McCaw %ImpOLICE JACKSON, DAISY 824-1782 McCaw POLICE JACKSON, M.W. 824-1651 McCaw POLICE MARLER, CPL 824-1752 McCaw POLICE NEW McAMIS, ROBT DE824-6475 McCaw POLICE MOORE, SGT R. 824-1352 McCaw POLICE NEW DETECTIVE 824-2124 McCaw No I�. IP41One Dept Number Personnel Master # ?-15 999-5001 Sandy PERSONAL 4 I +vu>bile' (*Min 925-0483 Mayor, 214 001-3798 Admin 925-0485 City Mgr 214 001-3798 Admin 980-9064 JUDGE BRADLEY 214 001-3799 Admin 988-9509 KATE BARLOW 214 001-3799 Admin 999-0498 Shana Rice 214 001-3799 Finance 988-7941 Lou Anne Heath 214 001-3799 Fire 925-8060 Medic 1 214 001-3798 Fire 929-3041 Bag Phone 214 001-3798 Fire 999-2940 Dir Williams 214 001-3799 Fire 999-2944 Fire Marshal 214 001-3799 Fire 999-2945 Emlink 214 001-3799 Police 688-2544 MARLER, JEFF 214 001-3799 Police 925-0484 C. Ward 214 001-3798 Police 925-0486 G. Gregg 214 001-3798 Police 925-8046 Traffic 214 001-3799 Police 925-8048 Traffic 214 001-3799 Police 925-8056 Warrants 214 001-3798 Police 925-8057 Patrol 214 001-3798 ' Police 925-8058 Patrol 214 001-3798 Police 925-8061 Dir Jackson 214 001-3798 Police 980-3448 DIR CAMPBELL 214 001-3799 Police 992-6774 KNIGHT, JOHN 214 001-3799 Police 992-7349 Dir Gregg 214 001-3798 Police 994-3560 DET CLARK 214-001-3799 i'oolice 999-2941 Patrol 214 001-3799 ice 999-2942 Patrol 214 001-3799 lice 999-2943 Patrol 214 001-3799 Public Wks 925-8062 Bob Whitehead 214 001-3798 Public Wks 980-4487 GLENDA JAYNES 214 001-3799 Public Wks 992-7352 Ernest Bramlett 214 001-3799 Public Wks 996-3030 Darwin Cheatham Public Wks 999-0968 Ron Harper 214 001-3799 Public Wks 999-3648 Mike Patterson 214 001-3799 Street 688-0113 Brad Payton qqa-62 IS1k GReq Last q30-549$ ,c)aA 5oc.. L\go-Dr)s? L\ \Aka qq1A- Sag PISCR+Ch ► on6- 3 MD e k L\ CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed ALL FUNDS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest Income 121,287 268,192 361,250 403,000 340,500 Fees 587,977 1,000,899 1,041,000 895,000 1,365,000 Assessment Income 11,228 6,101 1,060 5,000 70,000 Developer Participation 250,175 79,825 0 0 0 Carroll ISD Participation 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 City of Keller Participation 0 52,402 40.353 0 0 Total Revenue 970,667 1,407,419 1,473,663 1,303,000 1,805,500 Expenditures Water/Sewer Projects 1993 Water Bond Projects($1.3 million) 241,698 1,073,555 142,456 152,065 0 Water Impact Fee Fund 17,835 126,856 207,220 180,000 279,800 Sewer Impact Fee Fund 177,134 414,010 1,307,500 560,000 400,000 Waterworks Improvements Fund 0 240,599 993,740 0 0 1995 Water Bond Projects($2.5 million) 0 0 596,000 50,000 1,725,000 16, Sewer Assessment Fund 0 0 1.300,000 125,000 2.254.840 Subtotal-Water/Sewer Projects 436,667 1.855.020 4.546.916 1.067,065 4.659.640 Streets/Drainage Projects 1993 Street Bond Projects($1.5 million) 308,614 697,878 1,023,791 500,891 0 1994 Street Bond Projects($3 million) 0 104,712 2,468,000 394,020 2,501,438 Perimeter Road Fee Fund 0 0 0 55,395 0 Infrastructure Reserve Fund 0 0 840,526 1,748,000 3,921,650 Offsite Drainage Fund 0 0 0 0 0 Street Impact Fee Fund 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal-Streets/Drainage Projects 308.614 802.590 4.332.317 2.698.306 6.423.088 Parks Projects SPDC Revenue Bond Projects 0 258,651 2.635.963 2.563.329 141,207 Total Expenditures 745.281 2.916.261 11.515,196 6,328.700 11.223.935 Net Revenue 225,386 (1,508,842) (10,041,533) (5,025,700) (9,418,435) Bond Proceeds 2,800,000 5,603,772 5,300,000 5,665,995 4,940,000 Transfers in 0 0 1,570,026 918,375 0 Transfer out 0 (152.000) (114,755) (410.130) (116.676) Total Other Sources(Uses) 2,800,000 5,451,772 6,755,271 6,174,240 4,823,324 Beginning Fund Balance 724,772 3,750,158 7,693,088 7,693,088 8,841,628 Ending Fund Balance 3.750.158 7,693.088 4,406.826 8.8,41,628 4.246.517 • 4101 (.y CAPITAL PROJECTS o PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 757-$1.3 MILLION FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1993 WATER BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest income 39,699 25,217 5,000 5,000 0 Developer Participation(Oakwood Estates) 35,000 10,000 0 0 0 Keller Participation-Beach Str 0 52.402 40.353 0 0 Total Revenue/Other Sources 74,699 87,619 45,353 5,000 0 Expenditures Engineering contract 75,151 46,588 0 0 0 Water line-FM1709 west(Bal.of contract) 6,291 0 0 0 0 Water line-N.White Chapel(Oakwood) 160,256 0 0 0 0 Pearson Lane Pumps 0 19,274 0 0 0 12"High-Pressure 0 470,881 0 0 0 8"Peytonville(Cont-FM1709)12"Cont./TWKing 0 271,171 0 0 0 Shady Lane water line improvements 0 0 142,456 127,667 0 Beach Street Pumps/Upgrade-Keller pump station 0 265,641 0 24.398 0 Total Expenditures 241,698 1,073,555 142,456 152,065 0 (,Net Revenue (166,999) (985,936) (97,103) (147,065) 0 Bond Proceeds(11/92) 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 1,133,001 147,065 147,065 0 Ending Fund Balance 1.133.001 1.47,065 49.962 Q Q C 110 C CAPITAL PROJECTS o6rzz�s5 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 751 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed WATER IMPACT FEES Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Impact fee receipts 243,000 371,940 390,000 300,000 317,500 CISD participation-Shady Oaks 12"water line 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 Interest Income 12,362 20.848 35,000 30,000 30.000 Total Revenue 255,362 392,788 455,000 330,000 377,500 Expenditures Impact fee update 17,835 0 0 10,000 5,000 Construction/Engineering-Kimball water line 0 126,856 77,220 25,000 0 N.Kimball 12"water main 0 0 0 0 125,800 S.White Chapel 12"water main 0 0 0 0 149,000 Shady Oaks 12"water line(CISD) 0 0 130,000 145.000 0 Total Expenditures 17,835 126,856 207,220 180,000 279,800 Net Revenue 237,527 265,932 247,780 150,000 97,700 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 toe Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 (152.000) (114.755) (114,755) (116.676) Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 (152,000) (114,755) (114,755) (116,676) Beginning Fund Balance 230,247 467,774 581,706 581,706 616,951 Ending Fund Balance 467,774 581,706 714.731 616.951 597.975 C' • in C CAPITAL PROJECTS a bndb PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET d964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 752 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed SEWER IMPACT FEES Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Impact fee receipts 315,112 541,143 575,000 460,000 492,500 Interest Income 17,362 29,917 37,500 30,000 36,000 Developer contributions 215.175 69,825 0 0 0 Total Revenue/Other Sources 547,649 640,885 612,500 490,000 528,500 Expenditures S-2 Sewer line easements 18,950 0 0 0 0 Engineering-S-2 Sewer line(BearCr/1709) 15,220 4,356 0 0 0 Construction-S-2 Sewer line(BearCr/1709) 142,964 337,265 0 0 0 S2A Sewer line(1709/Florence) 0 0 454,500 30,000 400,000 N-5 Sewer line 0 0 350,000 10,000 0 N-4 Sewer line 0 72,389 503.000 520.000 0 Total Expenditures 177,134 414,010 1,307,500 560,000 400,000 Net Revenue 370,515 226,875 (695,000) (70,000) 128,500 tio Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 250,122 620,637 847,512 847,512 777,512 Ending Fund Balance 620,637 847.512 152,512 777.512 906.012 C • 0 (w. CAPITAL PROJECTS 08/22/95 bndb PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET d964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 750 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENTS FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Interest Income 4.964 11,018 35.000 0 0 Total Revenue/Other Sources 4,964 11,018 35,000 0 0 Expenditures: Marshall Creek Sewer Line participation* 0 240,599 243,740 0 0 Water/Sewer system improvements 0 0 670,000 0 0 Land-elevated water storage site 0 0 80,000 0 0 Total Expenditures 0 240,599 993,740 0 0 Net Revenue 4,964 (229,581) (958,740) 0 0 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In** 0 0 750,000 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 750,000 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 224,617 229,581 (0) (0) (0) Ending Fund Balance 229.5$1 ( (208.740) al 0 *The Marshall Creek Sewer line participation was a one time payment of$240,599 which was made at the end of fiscal year 1994 after the budget for 1995 had been adopted,allocating the funds in the 1994-95 year instead. **$750,000 was allocated as a transfer from the Utility Fund to provide seed money for the sewer assessment program. Instead$1.3 million in bonds were issued for the entire first year of the program. Funds were not transferred from the Utility Fund. The City reallocated a portion of these funds($450,000)in the Utility Fund for payment of debt service on the Denton Creek pressure line initiated during the year. . , @ CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.w(4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 758 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1995 WATER BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest Income 0 0 47.000 47,000 90.000 Total Revenue/Other Sources 0 0 47,000 47,000 90,000 Expenditures Engineering 0 0 196,000 50,000 25,000 Land 0 0 0 0 200,000 Ground Storage Tank-5 million gallons 0 0 400.000 0 1.500.000 Total Expenditures 0 0 596,000 50,000 1,725,000 Net Revenue 0 0 (549,000) (3,000) (1,635,000) Bond Proceeds 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 2,497,000 Ending Fund Balance 0 0 1.951.000 2.497,000 862,000 C 0 CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 755 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed SEWER ASSESSMENT FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Assessment Income 11,228 6,101 1,060 5,000 70,000 Interest Income 1.068 1.576 37.500 37,500 60.000 Total Revenue 12,296 7,677 38,560 42,500 130,000 Expenditures Engineering 0 0 0 125,000 35,000 Year 1 sewer assessment program* 0 0 1,300,000 0 0 Vista Trails 0 0 0 0 247,000 Cimarron Estates 0 0 0 0 48,500 Emerald Estates 0 0 0 0 142,340 Whispering Dell Estates 0 0 0 0 165,000 Highland Estates 0 0 0 0 127,000 Year 2 sewer assessment program** 0 0 0 0 1.490.000 Total Expenditures 0 0 1,300,000 125,000 2,254,840 Net Revenue 12,296 7,677 (1,261,440) (82,500) (2,124,840) (111.9 Bond Proceeds 0 0 1,300,000 1,317,050 990,000 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 1,300,000 1,317,050 990,000 Beginning Fund Balance 19,786 32,082 39,759 39,759 1,274,309 Ending Fund Balance 32,002 39.759 78,319 1.274,399 139,469 Year 1 =Vista Trails,Cimarron Estates, Emerald Estates,Whispering Dell Estates, Highland Estates **Year 2=Huntwick, Diamond Circle, Mission Hills, Rainforest/Shady Lane vicinity • 6,4) CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 703-$1.5 MILLION FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1993 STREET BOND PROJECTS Acttat Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest income 45.265 43,548 25.000 18.000 4.500 Total Revenue 45,265 43,548 25,000 18,000 4,500 Expenditures Engineering contract 135,339 51,985 10,000 0 0 Administrative expenses(bond issuance) 24,437 0 0 0 0 N.Carroll-Dove/Bumey - 148,838 351,535 0 0 0 N.Carroll-SH114/Dove - 0 86,158 463,661 195,175 0 N.Carroll-FM1709/Continental 0 0 392,763 0 0 S.White Chapel-Big Bear Creek/FM1709 0 0 0 211,295 0 S.Peytonville Road-FM1709/Continental Blvd. 0 208.200 157.367 94.421 0 Total Expenditures 308,614 697,878 1,023,791 500,891 0 Net Revenue (263,349) (654,330) (998,791) (482,891) 4,500 Bond Proceeds(11/92) 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 1,236,651 582,321 582,321 99,430 Ending Fund Balance 1.236,651 582,321 (416.,470) 99.430 103.930 i L • 40011) CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 700-$3.0 MILLION FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1994 STREET BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest Income 0 102,067 75,000 108.000 77.000 Total Revenue 0 102,067 75,000 108,000 77,000 Expenditures Engineering contract 0 104,712 93,000 60,000 0 Brumlow-Continental/SH26-. 0 0 270,000 0 0 N.Carroll-1709/114 0 0 0 0 293,721 S.Carroll-1709/Continental Blvd.— 0 0 325,000 0 326,580 E.Dove-White Chapel/Kimball— 0 0 900,000 - 0 859,000 W.Dove-Creek/Peytonville 0 0 0 0 28,607 W. Dove-Peytonville/Shady Oaks 0 0 0 0 142,100 E.Highland-Carroll/Kimball 0 0 0 0 172,960 W. Highland-Shady Oaks/White Chapel 0 0 0 0 121,900 N. Kimball-Highland/Dove 0 0 0 0 185,430 N.Kimball-1709/Highland 0 0 0 0 250,140 N.White Chapel-SH114/Dove 0 0 0 0 121,000 N.White Chapel-FM1709/SH114— 0 0 555,000 334,020 0 S.White Chapel-Continental/FM1709_ 0 0 325.000 0 0 Total Expenditures 0 104,712 2,468,000 394,020 2,501,438 Net Revenue 0 (2,645) (2,393,000) (286,020) (2,424,438) Bond Proceeds(11/93) 0 3,001,137 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 3,001,137 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 2,998,492 2,998,492 2,712,472 Ending Fund Balance 0 2,998.492 605,492 2,712 472 288,034 V C CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 502 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed PERIMETER ROAD FEE FUNDActual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Perimeter Road Fees 29,865 48,875 76,000 90,000 0 Interest income 567 2.881 5.000 5.000 3.000 Total Revenue/Other Sources 30,432 51,756 81,000 95,000 3,000 Expenditures E.Continental(Timarron/Dominion participation) 0 0 0 55.395 0 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 55,395 0 Net Revenue 30,432 51,756 81,000 39,605 3,000 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 30,432 82,188 82,188 121,793 Ending Fund Balance 30,432 82.188 163.188 121,793 124.793 •• 0 (0.0 CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 501 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed INFRASTRUCTURE RESERVE FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Interest Income 0 0 20.500 20,500 1,500 Total Revenue/Other Sources 0 0 20,500 20,500 1,500 Expenditures Kimball Road-FM1709/SH114 0 0 400,000 500,000 0 Randol Mill-1709 to Kingswood 0 0 103,100 15,000 319,770 West Beach Land Acquisition 0 0 0 1,168,000 0 Summer Place drainage improvements 0 0 60,000 65,000 0 Vista Trails(contractor) 0 0 163,000 0 0 Engineering-Continental/SH26 RR Crossing 0 0 20,500 0 0 Land acquisition(Municipal Facility) x 0 0 0 0 850,000 Street improvements-year 1 sewer assm progra 0 0 0 0 440,000 Street improvements-year 2 sewer assm program 0 0 0 0 709,445 Ridgecrest 0 0 93,926 0 r. 214,500 Love Henry 0 0 0 0 58,080 Bumey to cul-de-sac 0 0 0 0 49,500 Brock 4 0 0 0 0 58,080 Lake Drive 0 0 0 0 80,800 Bumey Road 0 0 0 0 112,475 Hilltop/Briar/Hillside/CrescentNVoodland IE 0 0 0 0 250,000 Johnson Road 0 0 0 0 475,000 Pine/Lilac - 0 0 0 0 204,000 Seal-Coat Streets . 0 0 0 0 50,000 Culvert©S. Carroll and Continental 0 0 0 0 50.000 Total Expenditures 0 0 840,526 1,748,000 3,921,650 Net Revenue 0 0 (820,026) (1,727,500) (3,920,150) Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 872,625 3,950,000 Transfers In 0 0 820,026 918,375 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 820,026 1,791,000 3,950,000 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 63,500 Ending Fund Balance 0 4 4 63,500 93,350 •Funding for reconstruction of Vista Trails Subdivision streets only. Street repairs for the remaining Year 1 neighborhoods(Cimarron,Highland Estates,Whispering Dell Estates, Emerald)are included in the estimate of sewer installation in the Sewer Assessment Fund.(Assumes Rone Engineering street design). c 0 C CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed STREET IMPACT FEE FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Impact fee receipts 0 0 0 0 525,000 Interest Income 0 0 0 0 6.000 Total Revenue 0 0 0 0 531,000 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Net Revenue 0 0 0 0 531,000 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Fund Balance Q Q Q Q 531.000 e) CAPITAL PROJECTS08/22/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed DRAINAGE-OFFSITE Actual &kW Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Drainage Fees 0 38,941 0 45,000 30,000 Interest Income 0 795 0 2,000 2,500 Total Revenue 0 39,736 0 47,000 32,500 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Net Revenue 0 39,736 0 47,000 32,500 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 39,736 39,736 86,736 Ending Fund Balance 0 39136 39,736 86,736 119.236 C. a (601 CAPITAL PROJECTS 0822/95 bndb PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET d964.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 Fund 302 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed SPDC REVENUE BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Interest income 0 30,325 38,750 100.000 30.000 Total Revenue/Other Sources 0 30,325 38,750 100,000 30,000 Expenditures Joint Use Improvements-Gymnasium 0 0 0 719,690 44,207 Bicentennial Park-Phase I 0 0 1,635,963 1,843,639 97,000 Land Acquisition 0 258,651 1.000,000 0 0 Total Expenditures 0 258,651 2,635,963 2,563,329 141,207 Net Revenue 0 (228,326) (2,597,213) (2,463,329) (111,207) Bond Proceeds 0 2,602,635 1,500,000 976,320 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out(down payment-W. Beach) 0 0 0 (295.375) 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 2,602,635 1,500,000 680,945 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 2,374,309 2,374,309 591,925 Mlle Ending Fund Balance 4 2,374,309 1,27_7,096 591,925 480.7i • to L Cif I• w O ao q aly n b b a) tH4 w N cu . . II.▪ .. O >. b cd 'q O :b .� cd p a ed F, a• y a� a o ¢ o• N ., N tial o ~Z C.) Q d r o 0K3 b W .�o a . m 0 0o c • a. co 0. °' ' o �U , 7 co . 1 . wti ; w `d '3 2 ,t, V1 cd; eatbN O O 'N ai C 3 : n > ,...0N tn Y ol CZ' :;> 4 H G CD▪ o "1 • c roa.) • 0C a A w °) w � a o $ o O ci a) o D Z W al 0 r • � a .NU � i M Is Q 'a40 �. ▪: :•:;:;:▪4::',': to ▪` ` C 'O C a. N a aOO b �. E- '7 Z d 7.1 17 a Iia' • ' 0a) ) a) 04" Ea) n CL d O .0 '- C P. V U V) Q g .0 U a V) O Q i co) O °q !' Q P ‘ MCI ON PO D o '� z '" It ti PI Al z � Cr, VD 01 $ I ON at • V ; : C O s , ttig 'at co ~ QO ppes - C N>, y v L O a W AO CO C " O aQL O ...zdo y O O d4 d O a a 4 G Y O r. E. y .0 • os O0., O O O 0-4 •� O O p O ' = wO o CI w �y a d E §._ cn 0 Z c„, W Z N 0 ,... V� .0 E0 . _ E y Qcn v cat v a a° T.. 1.) ,t u V A� Ca a> 9 �0 a a a� b c 3 l 'N ` S. • Cl •tiL 0,0 tz„0, `' u M C O N � Q. ., to iii.::.:::iiiiiii o an to E, V Qr . ...... O ❑ ao y •0 a) c'Jj O ea:,.0 C > 5 0 o as'O a, a' �, as O a, a bo li❑ ai o G0 , a 0 ti a g %.1 oo o s _ v, -0 Ov `� $ aD iv $ ? a, cd w a, I ai o a. 3 C VJ pq CL..0.� it ct N O CA = O 'C . bA 4) O U ed N p y 0 U r. w •O �'� G: U O a" y 'U y C 1.. ycat 0., .. by G E E .� „...0 U. cat �•. w w b '• a > o d �i:> : o y fnq O s o ; a, 3 0 0 .- z. a, I0 U at o v.:< a, a,la%4. U C O 30 O o o w cd a00 q y ., y E . ? w 2 •w p bp 0 d ▪44 •— ck." .� o cd h . O a, a, �. gip a, ed .� H id 'd -0 ed [ w > N E •C'0� y.'s ed 2 cd E ;+: `; a, 4. .� U 8 c. O U bQ p R b0 w 44 cz .� O t- .,:LirE a, ed ed cd .;. C Q g •C -. • O A U .� d) O b •`::`:imi y 0 U end +tea)•' f 0 o 'o a, w w 00 , o w a, °, ed a, O f„ '•' > a, C c� .- ?E V. b 0 a rx.' s w A1:3 P E A a 3 E+ W g a a g IM ° cd . ` ..' a w v� v> > . � C7 .c cd ._ ,._, y U 3 a •0 U � :D A O •--� N g o' r. CO of V 1 �O E:'.........:. CO O ---. CO cat .� aii Sit .. 3: F ^R a, .s ::. 0 ' U a.) -0 •.: o 0E::::K .0 O h 0 y..A ❑ C C 5Q U O r' ,i O O 3 0 O o O U '` U U U 0 E h U 4. O ::::::::: �"1 Cn 0 A r.: .0 a 3 a, • c bo b .....001 "0 oO o O °a, a) a, a _ >U O C T O >, 0 Q T O U . ' E E %'E a, U [ b L —40,-,-.5 0 O .0 > 3 a.. O O a) �"' �:$E EE E O cd O co N a �C a as w a U U a CQ 4 �, :;i: w vi U U v) U a a ~ N COV7 4, - 4, 4 ON N N '`: CO N N N N .•-. r. CO - •f. .0 .--. 00 .--. co, bi'l :: � a) 0000 �'' 4. a) y U U .N. '•, p "0bA c) p O =I N Q p ,71 ^� 4, 0 N O O :� ccV N•ti w •0 .a 0 0 3 ``:::: spy o a a b 3 a) - 4 IV . 3ti3 or) :9 cn cn 0 3- cct u oo , '0) o0 c'IE i ::' ° • a c .::.. 0 0 :: o 0 0 0 0 '" :- ' d 6 N •'v,'2% U t. N v� a) v) to 0 -':••:*.*:�k e2 ., 3 1: y 0 a) — N Q. . ^y C . a) G coi •s 0..':' C Go >c. 'U cu p ao aai . « H 3 b p y ~O a) OE: Wan : -• •:.: o T 0 a o.. 0 i•:4 ::.a w bYa:,vfoCO Eo 't w , v a '4' ai a - w y y : . 0 .v.. g 5, { : p ::: a) w Y 71 O C > 'E., ., aR, D C 0 y .'" A. O / vz• ..\:: { Y, r:..:%{ .:: I m N �. .Mr �p .I • 5S ill f • • ti:M1.,.L�t lift: f 0 a) F 0 U 0 oa a o 3 :;... w 0 + CO O CU` - 0 " U o rn N {' o 4, L° o M1: ?r C# :r{ u- 0 0 CO ::: tti i 4 Q .. q C 0 i a) c i a a) cO CO.c a 0 `, c) E� 0 E >, 0 o a y 0 x 0 N CO t-. a, U H 0 CO .' > 1.. C. CO a Ca Li 3 m 0o ON -� c a m �t kn VD N N M M M M M M - . City of Southlake Street Bond Projects As of July 31, 1995 L Variance favorable/ Actual Budget (unfavorable) Revenues and Sources of Funds Bond Proceeds 4,501,137 4,500,000 1,137 Interest Earnings 304.318 0 304,318 Funds Available 4,805,455 4,500,000 305,455 Expenditures Administrative (bond issue costs) 24,437 0 (24,437) Engineering 348,309 0 (348,309) N. Carroll-Dove/Bumey 496,387 125,000 (371,387) N. Carroll-114/Dove 277,505 575,000 297,495 E. Continental-White Chapel/Carroll Timarron 125,000 125,000 E. Continental-Brumlow/Kimball County/General 0 0 E. Continental-Carroll/Brumlow County 0 0 N. Peytonville-north of 1709 County 0 0 S. Peytonville-Continental/1709 312,099 350,000 37,901 Total Expenditures as of July 31, 1995 1,458,737. 1,175,000 (283,737) Cash on Hand as of July 31, 1995 3.346,718 Variance Estimate or favorable/ Encumbered Budget (unfavorable) raining Projects � N. Carroll-1709/114 (excludes ROW to realign) _V1 293,721 225,000 (68,721) S. Carroll-1709/Continental r 3 tAJ"D 326,580 190,000 (136,580) W. Continental-White Chapel/Davis l Z P° 555,750 525,000 (30,750) E. Dove-White Chapel/Kimball** �s " 0° 859,000 825,000 (34,000) W. Dove-Randol Mill/Peytonville I 28,607 80,000 51,393 W. Dove-Peytonville/Shady Oaks (9 142,100 125,000 (17,100) E. Highland-Carroll/Kimball 1^1 172,960 130,000 (42,960) W. Highland-Shady Oaks/White Chapel L7 121,900 100,000 (21,900) N. Kimball-Highland/Dove i 185,430 140,000 (45,430) N. Kimball-Highland (, 7 250,140 200,000 (50,140) N. White Chapel-114/Dove `l Z - 121,000 100,000 (21,000) ape 4* 0 425,000 90,980 . _ 00 (1.295) Total of remaining projects 3,602,503 3,275,000 (327,503) Grand Total expenditures all projects 5,061,240 4,450,000 (611,240) Funds Available (255.785) 50,000 Cost estimates include lateral drainage, ditching, and projected ROW. Final design may result in additional drainage improvements. t estimates exclude engineering fees. roject currently under contract ** Project currently under design 0829/95 strt895.wk4 [ -RECOMMENDATIONS OF STREET CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE ♦e RECOMMENDED COST/ PRIORTY ROAD SECTION PVMT. TYPE COMPLETE COST 1. N. KIMBALL (HIGHLAND - DOVE) A 40,000 / 140,000 Northbound left turn lane at Highland, northbound and southbound turn lanes at Dove. Realign intersection at Dove. %f 2. N. WHITES CHAPEL (1709 - 114) A 425,000 / 425,000 Recommend construction of entire _section to 114. Improve visibility where East & Westbound streets intersect. Turn lane at 1709. 3. E. CONTINENTAL (CARROLL - BRUMLOW) A 0 / 0 By County. 4. S. WHITES CHAPEL (CONTINENTAL - 1709) A 40,000 / 210,000 Recommend realign and left turn lane at 1709 to match N. Whites Chapel. Clear bar ditches for visiblity at area near Pine. .15. E. DOVE (CARROLL - KIMBALL) A 500,000 / 500,000 Recommend reconstruction, widen culverts and clean bar ditches. Place stop signs on Lonesome Dove. 6. N. KIMBALL (1709 - HIGHLAND) A 40,000 / 200,000 Maintenance only and widen culverts. 4•47. E. CONTINNENTAL (WH CHAPEL - CARROLL) A 125, 000 / 125,000 Construct 2" pavement type until Mobil project is finished. Try to recover some costs from Mobil. J 8. N. CARROLL (114 - DOVE) A 450, 000 / 575,000 Construct 36' width with continous left turn lane in area of school. Pavement from 114 to box culvert just north of elementary school only. This will require major storm sewer and culvert construction and possible right of way aquisition. No construction on remainder of section. 9. N. WHITES CHAPEL (114 - DOVE) B 0 / 100, 000 No action needed at this time. 10. N. CARROLL (1709 - 114) A 225,000 / 225,000 Construct entire section but section from the area of the post office and the fire station to 114 to be 36' wide for continous left turn lane. Realign Carroll at 1709. 11. E. DOVE (WHITES CHAPEL - CARROLL) A 150, 000 / 325,000 No action needed at this time on road except realignment at Carroll intersection and at Whites Chapel intersection. Need culvert extensions. 12. W. CONTINENTAL (DAVIS - WH CHAPEL) A 100,000 / 525,000 No action needed at this time on road. Needs box culvert extensions and drainage improvements. Caution signing or lights for sight problems on hills. 13. S. CARROLL (1709 - CONTINENTAL) A 25,000 / 190,000 Correct drainage problems and grade bar ditches. 14. N. PEYTONVILLE (1709 - RAVENWOOD) A 0 / 0 To be done by County. 15. W. DOVE (RANDOL MILL - PEYTONVILLE) B 0 / 80,000 Most of road not in Southlake city limits. City may want to address safety concerns as street is used by Southlake residents. 16. E. CONTINENTAL (BRUNLOW - KIMBALL) A 0 / 0 By County. 17. W. HIGHLAND (SHADY OAKS - WH CHAPEL) B 0 / 100,000 No road work needed at this time. Visibility problems at Whites Chapel intersection to be cleaned up by City maintenance crews. 18. S. PEYTONVILLE (1709 - CONTINENTAL) A 350,000 / 350,000 Should be moved up on priority list because of schools. Need three lanes from 1709 to past high school for continous left turn lane. Remainder of section to be standard "A" road section. Clear right of way of brush and overhanging trees. 19. W. DOVE (PEYTONVILLE - SHADY OAKS) B 50,000 / 125,000 Widen box culvert. 20. BRUMLOW A 150, 000 / 0 Move up`in priority. Rebuild, widening intersection at Continental. 21. E. HIGHLAND (CARROLL - KIMBALL) B 0 / 130,000 No road work needed at this time. 22. E. HIGHLAND (WH CHAPEL - CARROLL) B 0 / 130, 000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. 23. N. PEYTONVILLE (WOODBROOK - TEN BAR) B 0 / 70, 000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. 24. N. WHITES CHAPEL (DOVE - BOB JONES) B 0 / 285,000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. J 25. N. CARROLL (DOVE - BURNEY) B 125,000 / 125,000 Move up in priority due to existing condition and maintenance expense. . S. W. DOVE (SHADY OAKKS - WH CHAPEL) B 0 / 60,000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. 27. N. PEYTONVILLE (DOVE - WOODBROOK) B 0 / 140,000 Traffic does warrant any action at this time. 28. LONSOME DOVE B 0 / 80,000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. 29. BOB JONES (KING - WHITES CHAPEL) B 0 / 80,000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. 30. KING (BOB JONES - SH 114) B 0 / 125,000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. 31. SHADY OAKS (DOVE - HIGHLAND) B 0 / 125,000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. 32. SHADY OAKS (1709 - HIGHLAND) B 0 / 140,000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. 33. S. KIMBALL (1709 - CONTINENTAL) B 0 / 95,000 Traffic does not warrant any action at this time. TOTAL 2,795,000 / 5,780,000 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS STREET BOND PROJECTS as of November 1993 Initial Task Force Task Force Task Force $1.5M Currently priority Street Minimum Intermediate Recommended Issue(11/92) Contracted 29. Bob Jones 0 80,000 0 0 0 20. Brumlow 150,000 0 0 0 0 25. N. Carroll (Dove-Bumey) 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 200,914 8. N. Carroll (114-Dove) 450,000 575,000 575,000 575,000 0 10. N. Carroll (1709-114) 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 0 13. S. Carroll (1709-Continental) 25,000 190,000 190,000 75,000 0 7. E. Continental (White Chapel-Carroll) 125,000 125,000 125,000 0 0 3. E. Continental (Carroll-Brumlow) county county county 0 0 16. E. Continental (Brumlow-Kimball) county county county 0 0 12. W. Continental (Davis-White Chapel) 100,000 525,000 525,000 0 0 ii. E. Dove (White Chapel-Carroll) 150,000 325,000 325,000 75,000 0 5. E. Dove (Carroll-Kimball) 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 0 15. W. Dove (Randol Mill-Peytonville) 0 80,000 80,000 0 0 19. W. Dove (Peytonville-Shady Oaks) 50,000 125,000 125,000 0 0 26. W. Dove (Shady Oaks-White Chapel) 0 60,000 0 0 0 21. E. Highland (Carroll-Kimball) 0 130,000 130,000 0 0 22. E. Highland (White Chapel-Carroll) 0 130,000 0 0 0 17. W. Highland (Shady Oaks-White Chapel) 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 1. N. Kimball (Highland-Dove) 40,000 140,000 140,000 0 0 6. N. Kimball (1709-Highland) 40,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 33. S. Kimball (1709-Continental) 0 95,000 0 0 0 30. King, T.W. (Bob Jones-114) 0 125,000 0 0 0 gr.98. Lonesome Dove 0 80,000 0 0 0 Shady Oaks (Dove-Highland) 0 125,000 0 0 0 Shady Oaks (1709-Highland) 0 140,000 0 0 0 14. N. Peytonville (1709-Ravenwood) county county county 0 0 27. N. Peytonville (Dove-Woodbrook) 0 140,000 0 0 0 23. N. Peytonville (Woodbrook-Ten Bar) 0 70,000 0 0 0 18. S. Peytonville (1709-Continental) 350,000 350,000 350,000 425,000 0 24. N. White Chapel (Dove-Bob Jones) 0 285,000 0 0 0 9. N. White Chapel (114-Dove) 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 2. N. White Chapel (1709-114) 425,000 425,000 425,000 0 0 4. S. White Chapel (Continental-1709) 40.000 210.000 210.000 0 0 Total 2,795,000 5,780,000 4,450,000 1,500,000 200,914 Projects listed as'County'will be constructed with Tarrant County construction forces. The City of Southlake will purchase materials which will be funded through the General Fund budget, or as appropriate, through Bond funds. *$75,000 allocated each to S. Peytonville, S. Carroll, E. Dove for intersection alignment/ROW acquisition roadst.wld 04/05/94 C - 1 1 STEERING COI'IMITTEE OF CITIES PARTICIPATING IN GTE FRANCHISE FEE DISPUTE c/o City Attorney' s Office, City of Denton 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas 76201 (817) 566-8333/Fax (817) 382-7923 1 TO: ALL CITIES IN THE GTE SYSTEM WITH FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN MUTUAL RELEASE CLAUSES THAT RELEASE GTE FROM CLAIMS THAT MAY HAVE ARISEN UNDER PRIOR FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS FROM: MIKE BUCEK, TREASURER OF STEERING COMMITTEE SUBJECT: INVITATION TO JOIN IN A CONSOLIDATED CITIES ACTION AGAINST GTE FOR FAILURE TO PAY DELINQUENT FRANCHISE FEES AND FOR AUTOMATICALLY PASSING-THROUGH FRANCHISE FEES TO CITIES BY USE OF AN ILLEGAL TARIFF DATE: July 25, 1995 The Cities of BROWNFIELD, COLLEGE STATION, COMANCHE, CROSBYTON, DAINGERFIELD, DENTON, EL LAGO, HIGHLAND VILLAGE, LONE STAR, RALLS, RUSK, SEYMOUR, AND WEIMAR are involved in the actions referenced above in a case styled City of Rusk, et al . v. GTE pending in Cherokee County and a complaint before the Public Utility Commis- sion ("PUC") under Docket No. 14152 . GTE attempted to halt the proceeding in the Rusk case by filing a Plea in Abatement and Motion to Dismiss and on June 27, 1995, the Cherokee County court denied GTE' s actions. GTE attempted to halt the complaint before the PUC by filing a Motion to Dismiss on four counts, and the PUC' s Administrative Law Judge denied all counts. To date, GTE has not obtained a favorable ruling on any issue it has brought to a judge to consider. As a result of our success and their dissatisfaction with the terms of franchise agreements GTE is soliciting, several cities have inquired about joining our suit . The Steering Commit- tee of cities participating in our GTE franchise fee dispute voted on July 25th to allow additional cities to join in our actions, if additional cities with populations totalling at least of 50, 000 PASS THE APPROPRIATE RESOLUTIONS BY AUGUST 25 . Why would cities want to join our actions? The following are some of the answers we get to such question: 1 . GTE is unwilling to allow these cities to audit GTE' s records in order to determine if these cities have received the compensation authorized by existing franchises . 2 . GTE' s rates have remained constant while its cost of doing business has decreased and its revenues increased; however, franchise fees have mysteriously declined. L Selected GTE Cities July 25, 1995 Page 2 3 . GTE states it has paid in conformance with its franchises, but wants cities to release it from liability for claims in con- sideration of executing the new franchises being offered. 4 . Many cities with similar populations have franchises based on a percentage of gross receipts derived from GTE tariffs 6 and 36, but we have reason to believe that the compensation each city receives varies greatly. 5 . Many cities have franchises similar to the 57 cities involved in the Southwestern Bell delinquent franchise fee case, which was settled for $27. 5 million dollars. 6 . The audits performed by Reed-Stowe & Co. , Inc. in the Bell case reflected that cities with a franchise based on a percentage of gross receipts derived from the rendition of Local Exchange Telephone Transmission Service ("LETTS") received less than one-half of the franchise fees they were entitled to under their franchises for the eleven year period from 1983 to 1994 . 7 . The new franchises being offered by GTE are unfair since they are based on a payment for each access line in a city without consideration as to whether these lines are business or residential lines or how many services are provided through these lines. 8 . Local Exchange Carriers (like Bell & GTE) receive one-third of their annual revenues from "access charges" paid by long distance companies to GTE for GTE' s local exchange transmis- sion of calls for these companies. However, GTE does not include these revenues paid by long distance companies to GTE in the franchise fee base, even though GTE uses its lines located in city streets to transmit calls for these companies locally. 9 . GTE automatically passes-through all franchise fees to basic local service customers and none to other customers (like long distance companies) , even though the city streets are used to provide service to these other customers, and 30% of GTE' s revenues from inside the city are attributable to service to these other customers . 10 . GTE' s proposed flat fee franchises require cities to submit to non-binding mediation without legal representation prior to filing a civil action for a breach of contract and limits the right of the city to pursue its claim to four (4) years. L Selected GTE Cities July 25, 1995 Page 3 Why does the Steering Committee think your city should join our legal action? A. Reed-Stowe & Co. , Inc . will perform an audit of GTE' s records to determine if your city has been correctly paid the fran- chise fees it is owed under the franchise . B. The Steering Committee of Cities is represented by Casstevens & Casstevens, an Austin law firm specializing in communica- tions and public utility matters with prior successful experience before the PUC against GTE, and the Norman, Thrall, Angle & Guy Firm, our local counsel in the Rusk case, which was established in 1898, and is presently staffed with attor- neys holding numerous certifications from the State Board of Legal Specialization. C. The attorneys representing our cities are retained under hourly basis contracts. The cities felt, with the success the 57 cities in the Bell case experienced, that it would not be in the public' s interest to enter into 35% to 40% contingency fee contracts. D. A group of between twenty to twenty-five cities will have better leverage to negotiate a fair and reasonable compensa- tion rate in a future franchise agreement than one city negotiating alone. E. The cost to join is quite reasonable, and the cities are seeking reimbursement of this cost as part of these actions, and we will seek repayment as part of any settlement negotiat- ed between the parties. Each city joining will be assessed two dollars for each individual residing with its corporate limits, based on the 1990 U.S. Census (except for such portion of its population that may not be residing within the GTE system) . One dollar will be due on September 1, 1995, and the other dollar, if assessed by the Steering Committee, will be due on a date subsequent to January 1, 1996 . IF YOUR CITY DESIRES TO JOIN, please have your City Council ADOPT A RESOLUTION similar to the one enclosed, and forward a copy of same to us by mail or fax, so that we will receive it BY 4 : 00 P.M. C ON FRIDAY. AUGUST 25, 1995 . This deadline is mandatory since the Steering Committee, for legal reasons, desires to file the amended petition joining your city in the Rusk case before the September 1, 1995 effective date of the new telecommunications bill which amends the Public Utility Regulatory Act . Selected GTE Cities July 25, 1995 Page 4 Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me at 817-566-8333 , fax me at 817-382-7923, or call Grace Casstevens at 512-328-0992 . Mike Bucek Assistant City Attorney MB:sf Enclosure pc : Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager (letter only) Herbert L. Prouty, City Attorney (letter only) Grace Casstevens (letter only) A:\SOLICIT.2 E:\WPDOCS\RE.SUOIN.GTE C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PARTICIPATION OF THE CITY OF , TEXAS IN ACTIONS TO BE FILED IN THE STATE DISTRICT COURT TO COLLECT DELINQUENT FRANCHISE FEES FROM GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST ("GTE") AND IN AN ACTION PENDING WITH THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION TO SET ASIDE AN ILLEGAL AUTOMATIC "PASS THROUGH" TARIFF OF GTE; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR ATTORNEY AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("Bell") and 57 Texas cities served by Bell have reached a proposed settlement worth over $27.5 million in litigation concerning whether or not a local telephone exchange company must include in its gross receipts, for franchise fee purposes, revenues received from long distance carriers for access to local telephone lines; and WHEREAS, many cities, including , served by General C. Telephone Company of the Southwest ("GTE"), have franchise agreements setting franchise fees for the use of city right-of-way based on a percentage of the gross receipts collected by GTE within the corporate limits of such cities, similar to the franchise agreements litigated in the Bell case; and WHEREAS, certain cities, including the City of Denton, Texas, desire to pursue the collection of delinquent franchise fees owed by GTE and have retained the Austin law firm of Casstevens& Casstevens to proceed with actions before the Public Utility Commission and State District Court, to recover such fees without burdening ratepayers; and WHEREAS, a consolidated action by cities with franchise fees based upon gross receipts could reduce attorney and expert witness fees which would normally result from a duplication of effort; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEXAS: SECTION I. That the City of agrees to participate with other similarly situated Texas cities in the GTE system to pursue an action (1) before the Public Utility Commission to set aside an illegal automatic "pass through" tariff of GTE, and (2) to join Denton in filing an action in State District Court to collect delinquent franchise fees. SECTION II. That the City of agrees to contribute two ` dollars for each individual residing within its corporate limits, based on the 1990 U.S. census (except for such portion of its population that may not be residing within the GTE system), to underwrite the cost of legal and expert witness fees to be expended on behalf of the cities in this matter, one dollar being due on July 1, 1995, and the other dollar, if assessed, being due and payable on the date the Steering Committee authorizes such assessment. SECTION III. That ,or his or her designee(hereinafter, "Delegate") may participate on the Steering Committee of GTE Cities(with franchise fees based on a percentage of gross receipts) and is authorized to receive notices concerning Steering Committee activities at the following address: Name/Title City/Address Telephone: Fax: SECTION IV. That the City Manager/Mayor/City Attorney/Delegate is authorized to take those steps reasonable and necessary to comply with the intent of this resolution. SECTION V. That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. PRESENTED AND PASSED on this the day of , 1995, by a vote of ayes and nays at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of , Texas. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY BY: *(Please forward a copy of your resolution to the Steering Committee, c/o Mike Bucek, Acting City Attorney, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas 76201; 817-566-8333; Fax No. 817-382-7923.) PAGE 2 AL CITY of DENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817) 566-8200 Office of City Attorney TO: Participants on North Central Texas Council of Govern- ments' Telecommunications Task Force FROM: Mike Bucek, Acting City Attorney 3- SUBJECT: Arguments Raised by Telephone Companies during Franchise Negotiations which are Misleading and at Times False DATE: June 6, 1995 The following is a list of misleading and false arguments made by agents for local exchange telephone companies during negotiations with cities over franchise or right-of-way use agreements, and answers officials for cities can use in responding to such arguments. Cw FICTION: 1 . That Article 1446c §55 (b) Vernon' s Ann. Civ. St . (V.A.T.S. ) , a portion of the Public Utility Regulatory Act ("PURA" ) , eli- minates the requirement for telephone companies to enter into franchise agreements and to pay franchise or right-of-way use fees. FACT: This threat by telephone companies fails to address the fact that this provision relates only to a small portion of the municipality. In addition, other state law specifically authorizes franchises and franchise fees . Article 1446c §55 (b) V.A.T.S. relates to property recently annexed into the city. §21 is the controlling section of PURA relating to franchises, and it states : "Nothing in this Act shall be construed as in any way limiting the rights and powers of a municipality to grant or refuse franchises to the use the streets and alleys within its limits and to make the statutory charges for the use thereof, . . . " More importantly, Article 1175, §2, V.A.T.S. , amended in 1993 by the legislature, relating to enumerated powers of home-rule municipalities, states that a city has the power: "To prohibit the use of any street . . . by any telegraph [or] telephone company . . . without first obtaining the "Dedicated to Quality Service" L Telecommunications Task Force June 6, 1995 Page 2 consent of the governing authorities expressed by ordinance and upon paying such compensation as may be prescribed . . . by any such ordinance . " Also see Article 1016 V.A.T.S. FICTION: 2 . The telephone company does not have to pay franchise or right- of-way use fees if it has no contract with the City to do so. FACT: If this argument was true, why would any telephone company enter into a franchise agreement? This argument fails to take into account the fact that a telephone company may be subject to damages for a "trespass ab initio" if a franchise expires. A telephone company utilizing or occupying municipally-owned right- of-way without a contract would be trespassing, and could be liable for actual damages in the amount of the fair market rental value of the right-of-way, interest, and perhaps exemplary damages during the period of the trespass. Williams v. Garnett 608 S.W. 2d 794 (1980) . The telephone company may attempt to overcome the trespass action by arguing that it provided services other than money to the city which were accepted by the city in lieu of franchise fees. To overcome this argument, a city should consider adopting a street rental ordinance applicable to the telephone company that makes clear the compensation due to the city. A city that does not pursue the recovery of damages or compensation it may be due could be found in violation of Article 3, §52, Vernon' s Ann. Tex. Const . (V.A.T.C. ) . This section of the Texas Constitution states : . . .the legislature shall have no power to authorize any county, city . . . to grant public money or thing of value in aid of, or to any individual, association or corporation. . . " A trespass would be very costly to a telephone company in compari- son to the payment of franchise fees. For example, a city with 50, 000 inhabitants and 200 miles of internal streets collects a franchise fee of 2% of gross receipts of the company from local exchange telephone transmission services (including access fees from long distance carriers) which results in an annual compensa- tion to the city of $400, 000 . If the franchise expires, the city has the right to seek damages in the amount of the fair market rental value of the rights-of-way in which the company' s cables are installed. Very conservatively, most companies would be using at least half of the 200 miles of street right-of-way, plus additional L Telecommunications Task Force June 6, 1995 Page 3 miles of utility easements across the city. Competitive Access Providers ( "CAPS") generally pay between $1 . 00-$2 . 00 per linear foot to use city rights-of-way for its cables. Each 100 miles of cable equals 528, 000 linear feet, which would convert to $528, 000 (based on only $1 . 00 per foot) , rather than the $400, 000 the telephone company would have paid if it had executed a reasonable franchise agreement. There is no deadline for the city to pursue its action for tres- pass . A smaller city could wait for a number of years before suing in order to accumulate a reasonable amount of damages before taking legal action. State law (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §16 . 061 [Ver- non Supp. 1995] ) provides that most statutes of limitations do not run against governments; however, a claim should be filed annually against the telephone company requesting payment of delinquent fees. FICTION: 3 . The telephone company may tell you to sign the new franchise and release your claims for any delinquent fees it failed to pay during the period under the old franchise or, when there was no franchise. The telephone company will argue that such a release is justified because whatever franchise fees the company pays will be automatically passed through to the city' s ratepayers . FACT: For the period from 1983 through 1994, automatic pass throughs were not allowed under the PURA. Although the PUC may have inadvertent- ly approved some of the automatic pass throughs, any automatic pass through tariff that was inadvertently approved by the PUC is voidable since the PUC can not violate the law upon which it was created. The telephone company can request the PUC to pass through delinquent franchise fees, but historically, when this has occurred such fees were spread over the entire system because of the tele- phone company' s negligence, and not passed through directly to only the ratepayers in the city where the delinquent fees accrued. Also, the PUC would be required to determine in what manner the pass through would occur. In other words, it would confirm that different classes of customers would not be discriminated against (customers making long distance calls would be required to pay a larger fee than a customer who receives only the basic service) . Additionally, the telephone company would be required to show that its profits were not excessive before such a cost of service could be passed through to the system' s ratepayers . New legislation in the PURA relating to "municipal fees" may be inapplicable to new franchises since such terms are not defined to include franchise Telecommunications Task Force June 6, 1995 Page 4 fees. Also, such legislation relates to increases in fees after September, 1995 . Cities executing franchises based on a percent of gross receipts similar to that set forth in their old franchise would not be increasing their franchise fees . Finally, there is no language in the new legislation relating to passing through delinquent fees. FICTION: 4 . The telephone company will warn you not to request higher franchise fees in your new franchise because such fees will only raise the bill the ratepayer is required to pay. FACT: This argument seeks to assert that ratepayers and taxpayers are the same group of individuals that pay based on the exact same percent- age. Although ratepayers and taxpayers may have some of the same members, they are not the same, and pay based on different percent- ages . Cur As a matter of law, the city' s taxpayers should not be required to underwrite the cost of telephone services . As mentioned above, the city, under Article 3, §52 of the Texas Constitution, cannot grant a gift or gratuity to an individual or corporation. For this reason, when an individual desires to rent a city facility, such as a civic center or meeting room in a recreational center for a pri- vate purpose, the city must charge such individual a reasonable rental fee to cover the expenses the city incurs, prorated to such facility or meeting room, based on debt service, utility, mainte- nance, and labor costs for making such room available. Failure to purposely charge an appropriate rental fee results in the city making a gift or gratuity to such renter. The same is true in the utility industry. If the reasonable rental value for a telephone company to use streets and utility easements in a city of 50, 000 individuals is $400, 000 a year, but the city only charges a rental fee of $100, 000 a year, then the taxpayers are providing a gift to the individual ratepayers. This results in the tax rate to fund the general government perhaps being 2 to 3 cents higher than it would otherwise be required to accomplish the same services pro- vided for in the city' s budget . Conversely, if the city were collecting rental fees under the franchise of $800, 000, and the fair market rental value of city streets and utility easements is only $400, 000, then the $400, 000 overcharge could result in the ratepayers' cost of service being found to be an arbitrary and capricious cost for which ratepayers were subsidizing taxpayers in violation of ratemaking laws requiring rates to be just and reasonable. Telecommunications Task Force June 6, 1995 Page 5 FICTION: 5 . The telephone company will tell you that payment of franchise fees based on a percentage of gross receipts from Local Exchange Telephone Transmission Services ( "LETTS") does not include revenues the telephone company gets from AT&T, MCI, and Sprint . FACT: Southwestern Bell paid $27 . 5 million dollars to 57 cities to keep the jury from deciding this issue. The truth is that agents for telephone companies, in testimony before the PUC, have stated that access fees from long distance carriers are treated as local exchange revenues. Also the PUC has interpreted local exchange service to include access fees paid by long distance carriers to use local exchange lines. (PUC Substantive Rule §23 . 61 (a) (25) ) . FICTION: 6 . The telephone company will tell you that if your City will execute a new franchise it will contract to provide touch-tone dialing service or basic custom calling features not previous- ly supplied the City. FACT: Section 3 . 1555 entitled "Minimum Services" of the new telecommuni- cations bill (H.B. 2128) that becomes effective September 1, 1995 requires the following features to be provided to all customers prior to December 31, 2000, regardless of what a City' s franchise requires a telephone company to provide : (a) touch-tone dialing (b) digital switching capability (c) call waiting (d) 3-way calling (e) speed calling (f) call forwarding (g) series completing (busy or no answer) (h) wake up or reminder service (i) single party service FICTION: 7 . The city cannot pass a valid street rental ordinance to which the telephone company does not consent . Telecommunications Task Force June 6, 1995 Page 6 FACT: The case of Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. City of Dallas, 174 W.W. 636 (Tex. Civ. App. - Waco, 1964, writ ref'd n.r.e. ) allowed Dallas to pass such an ordinance. Also, the Supreme Court has ruled that a street rental ordinance may be based on a percentage of gross receipts . Fleming v. Houston Lighting & Power Co. , 138 S.W.2d 923 (Sup.Ct . 1940) . B:\WPDOCS\COR\NCTCOG Dia CITY of DENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817) 566-8200 Office of City Attorney TO: ALL CITIES IN THE GTE SYSTEM WITH FRANCHISE FEES BASED ON A PERCENTAGE OF THE GROSS RECEIPTS (REVENUES) COLLECTED BY GTE FOR THE RENDITION OF LOCAL EXCHANGE TELEPHONE TRANSMISSION SERVICE FROM: MIKE BUCEK, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY Vii)_ SUBJECT: STEERING COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF GTE CITIES ON MAY 10 & 11, 1995 DATE: ,may.19 r 1995 I. Background A. PAST CLAIMS ELEMENT OF BELL SETTLEMENT The Bell settlement remits $12 million in cash, and equipment certificates worth $13 million (discount value of $3 . 9 million) to 57 cities for past claims. B. FUTURE CLAIMS ELEMENT OF BELL SETTLEMENT The Bell settlement relating to future claims provides : (1) all cities must execute new 3 or 5 year flat fee franchises to accept the settlement; (2) all cities, irrespective of whether they were originally a 2% or a 4% city, are elevated to 4% gross receipts model status; (3) this 4% gross receipts model is revised to include new revenue accounts; and (4) this 4% gross receipts model is converted to a flat fee franchise, which represents a fee of 4%, plus an additional 10% will be paid to all cities, so that all cities receive essentially 4 .4% fee in the future. Short term franchises were executed in order to allow cities to renegotiate their franchises, similarly to the terms of the franchise ultimately granted to Dallas by Bell, in the near future. Past claims of $27 . 5 million are not passed through to ratepayers, but all new franchise fees are passed through. C. AUDIT FINDINGS IN BELL CASE L The audit of the delinquencies owed to the Bell cities reflected that the cities were paid no more than one-half of the franchise fees to which they were entitled (e .g. , if a city received $5, 000 a year in franchise fees for "Dedicated to Quality Service" (Imir GTE Cities Meeting May 10 & May 11, 1995 Page 2 the period 1983 - 1994, the audits reflected that such city should have received at least $10, 000 a year) . II. Deficiencies in Bell settlement as applied to GTE GTE claims its tariff allows delinquent franchise fees to be passed through to its ratepayers, while Bell argued it could not pass through such fees. We would propose that cities need to either maintain their existing franchises, or execute new franchises based on a percentage of gross receipts. We would propose that cities need a PUC determination that GTE' s tariff can not automatically pass through franchise fee increases or delinquencies (PURA Section 2 .212g [formerly 43 (g) (1) ] ) , and further directing GTE or long distance carriers to pay the percentage of franchise fees allocated to future access revenues; otherwise, GTE may try to pass on the damages awarded in the lawsuit to the ratepayers, by surcharging basic local service customers. To protect the public interest, Denton has filed an action before the Public Utility Commis- sion to void GTE' s system-wide tariff. Denton would propose that all cities participating in this consolidated cities action against GTE join in prosecuting this endeavor to exhibit to their ratepayers concern that damages resulting from the negligence or fraud of GTE should not be borne by such ratepayers. III. Steering Committee ("SC") responsibilities SC will confirm litigation strategy proposed by Casstevens & Casstevens ("Casstevens" ) , including selection of expert witnesses (e.g. , companies auditing delinquent franchise fees) and local counsel for suit, if consolidated cities action is filed other than in Denton County. SC selects member city to serve as Treasurer of SC funds obtained during original $1 . 00 assessment and authorizes payment of fees of Casstevens, expert fees and other legal fees, if applicable. (Casstevens is agreeable to performing their services at $185 an hour; and the cost of the auditing services to be obtained will vary based on the expertise of the professional performing the ser- vice, but will, in all probability, be between $95 and $125 an hour) . SC determines if an additional assessment is needed, not to exceed $1 . 00 for each individual residing within a city' s corporate limits, based on the 1990 U.S. Census, in 1996 . SC determines venue of consolidated cities action. GTE has filed a declaratory judgment action against Denton in Denton County. Denton will be filing a plea in abatement or a motion for change of venue in the GTE vs. Denton case to the L GTE Cities Meeting May 10 & May 11, 1995 Page 3 location of the Court where the consolidated cities action against GTE is pending. Denton expects it will be allowed to join the consolidated cities action; however, if Denton must pursue its defense alone in Denton without assistance from the SC, Denton may withdraw its $132, 540 contribution to the SC. Original assessments for a city served by GTE and another carrier will be determined by multiplying that city' s 1990 census population by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total franchise fees paid by GTE in FY 1993 and the denomina- tor of which is the total of all telephone franchise fees, including GTE, paid to that City in FY 1993 . IV. Selection of steering committee member from seven cities Cities attending the meeting at the Houston-Galveston Area Council on May 10, and the North Central Texas Council of Gov- ernments on May 11 will determine who will be the members of the Steering Committee. V. Miscellaneous issues Should SC funds collected by the two assessments be depleted, the payment of all subsequent assessments will be on a voluntary basis, and the failure of a city to contribute will not result in the removal of that city from the lawsuit . Additionally, a city can remove itself from the litigation at any time without any liability to the SC for future assess- ments, but no refunds will be made by the SC of funds previ- ously contributed by such city. L A:\STEERAGD SOUTHWESTERN BELL CASE • "LOCAL EXCHANGE TELEPHONE TRANSMISSION SERVICE" (LETTS) • SETTLEMENT: CASH $12,000,000 DISCOUNTS $ 3,900,000 LITIGATION EXPENSE FUND $ 3,000,000 ATTORNEY'S FEES (CONTINGENCY BASED) $ 8,500,000 FLAT FEE FRANCHISE BASED ON 4% OF EXPANDED REVENUE BASE. R INCREASE THE FEE BY A 10% FACTOR. L 00 0 0 IDO O cri w (0 0) Co ..� GO O 0 0 . . U, (I) 0 ceiIll. Ea ��. = -J U t u) CU cn (0 D F- co _ o L.CU = LL' -g — M b C F COCCI bb N (.., r, a) O G 1 O N U O W 7:3 CO ..r 3 N O o M .� V ...........,...,.....„.„. .................. 0 u, ‘0 0 ' 0 e S .b V W N-": % o .s r- Cl) o ° 4) ,-- co b al p cw E cn ! N Q H W U .o N U H a. CD C -I ar 5 ,-. 04 —. c CD CD cD r - Z3 cn ►-• CD l . O CD C 0 O 0 �" a, p' At CCD C b p,. c. ... CCDD `0 CD `C 'CS P C� A� p CD a 0 C�J O AD ... !-tl' n CDfD eD ...•. 0 .1 = < ,-• el, eD a, f9 a. n id o . �• OCD a ° ']O i co ! t • CD b "d E °C a . .� EL;a • ._ ..• o a Ci �• .. o o . . .0 O S col h O r* -s oet, 0O "' .0 a' '7d Z CD "! tti y 0. O e9 (A CD a CO 0 AD °� `D r° a �. °N a @ o ' 5 d arRD • o' c b CD ., o 3. 0- va G� 'y O -io - .. a. -e C 0 va ep ° iit '0 -1 N CM �° ten} ,- v) CD ,qz 2' 0 0 •C y No r� Cp CO 2 '�` N `C CCD MO "O CO (jq O ,� b 5 CD � � CD w o 0 '� a � � 0 a' 0 ,-ti ° O 'C _� ('� C�7 O CD 0- CD r• v, O_ CD y 0• .y .y 0 CD A� ty CD P. , CD O CD f�D O M i C a '� c CD ° ►� ° o d d CD o O q a. Cr tmt° 1 , a0. , _ CD Cr CO o �' 4-4 ° a. CDz o CT o tdt cCR ° a. o , cA a. o o0 1-1:$ "r y 69 "LId o 0 H °` `rJ 0 d 7V g 00 (IQ O ul . C „ CD 0 ". cl ir a A . , ' l n`c va A. ' a'73 . 0 Cri cD � „ o xo 0 ". Oa.,- PV + C ' c CD DCD C O 0 H. CD CD. _ ... O .0 R° "i cm n• C oo b9 00 = C a-- 5. ,-i = y .0 0- 0 n •N C 0 Coo O a . aC BCD akao �� R. Ro A v' (.0 - Ut a• ° 3� O CD" oo cD b `p `C '� a. (v� ON O ¢' U�Q 4 b .._ v) 00_,O e A0 ,..069 n C CD •+) n Nrn ° '-co 'xi tT1 N U °�� � M y Cl. 9 O -n CD �.. r. O No � a 4a . y ".• CD o a. co P x a. oN C 'f3o-t 6A N EA N N N 01 CA W CCP ; 'N,a) Z. C Ok C O �1 O O Co� O O 0 - A 0 o o O H y 0 (11 rt .R O d o U City of Soufhlake,Texas rt k • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION: AUGUST 29. 1995 LOCATION: 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers, City Hall I TIME: 7:00 P.M. AGENDA , 1. Call to order. 2. Discussion: Fiscal Year 1995-96 Annual Budget. 3. , Meeting Adjourned. I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll.Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Wednesday, August 23, 1995 at.10:00 a.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. uuuau, �sOV?HL4,fr 8i i - 7,11akiN p.... -1‘L• T411 r`Bush v'' a Ac ' g City Secretary too 0 %,,,� * * * N4unauo oos- If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. cW5 .AGN/kb • L I r. IITRI.'COUNTY Section Sheeet No. 15 va Electric Cooperative, Inc. Tariff for Electric Service Revision Page SECTION TITLE: PUC Approved RATE SCHEDULES STAMP October 19, 1993 APPLICABLE TO ALL AREAS Implemented by TCEC November 1, 1993 Governmental Street Lighting A. Applicability Service is available to all governmental entities for unmetered street lighting service to areas served by the Cooperative. B. Monthly Rate Customer Charge: $8.00 Luminaire Charge, Per table shown below: • Pole Pole ' • Pole Pole LAMP:TYPE Type Type . Type Type._ . Rate A B • C D . Watts Lumens kWh Code Monthly Cost Mercury Vapor 175 7,900 70 M175 $6.25 $7.60 $9.75 $15.00 400 21,000 150 M400 $10.50 $12.25 $15.00 $38.50 High Pressure Sodium 100 9,000 40 H100 $5.55 $6.25 $9.751 $10.504( 150 16,000 70 H150 $6.56 $7.10 $9.75 $12.25 400 50,000 160 H400 $10.50 $12.25 $15.00 $38.50 Plus an amount for Purchased Power Cost as calculated in accordance with schedule PCRF on amount of estimated kWh power use shown for each lamp. C. Payment Bills are due when rendered and become past due if not paid within 16 days thereafter. Bills are increased by 5% if not paid within 16 days after being rendered. IITRI-COUNTY Section Sheeet No. 16 UMW Electric Cooperative, Inc. Tariff for Electric Service Revision Page SECTION TITLE: PUC Approved RATE SCHEDULES STAMP October 19, 1993 APPLICABLE TO ALL AREAS Implemented by TCEC November 1, 1993 D. Pole Type Definitions A through D A. Cooperative installed, owned, operated, and maintained street lights mounted on wood pole with a maximum arm extension from pole to fixture of 2 feet. B. Cooperative installed, owned, operated and maintained street lights mounted on wood pole with an extension arm length greater than 2 feet. C. Cooperative installed, owned, operated and maintained street light mounted on steel or ornamental pole of a type normally used by the Cooperative. D. Cooperative installed, owned, operated and maintained street light mounted on steel or ornamental pole of a non-standard type. Cooperative has received from customer or developer as aid for construction an amount equal to the difference in total installed cost of a street lighting system mounted on poles available under definition C. E. Agreement A contract for electric service covering a specified period may be required for installa- tion of new lighting system. F. Conditions The Cooperative will provide 125 feet of underground or overhead service for each light location and the member or developer will be required to pay for all costs necessitated by increased footage. The installation of underground service by the Cooperative does not provide for costs associated with special conditions like paved crossings, fencing, landscaping or the replacement of such. The Cooperative reserves the right to discontinue service at locations where excessive maintenance and or lamp replacement occur, or the Cooperative may charge member for such maintenance or lamp replacement. Maintenance of fixtures shall be performed upon request during normal business hours. The Cooperative will maintain facilities incidental to providing this service, including replace- ment of burned-out lamps. • TRI-COUNTY Section Sheeet No. 17 ectric Cooperative, Inc. Tariff for Electric Service Revision Page SECTION TITLE: PUC Approved RATE SCHEDULES STAMP October 19, 1993 APPLICABLE TO ALL AREAS Implemented by TCEC November 1, 1993 For billing purposes, all connections and disconnections are assumed to have occurred at the beginning of the current month's billing period. The Cooperative will replace an existing light with any of the lighting options listed-in this tariff upon request and payment by the Customer of$25.00. This charge is applicable to all replacements whether or not an agreement for electric service is in force and is designed to recover the Cooperative's anticipated labor cost associated with the change-out. -, i , - Tariff for Electric Service Texas Utilities Electric Company 3.3 Municipal Service Sheet: 3 Applicable: Entire System • Page of_3 .- . . . Effective Date: May 16, 1994 Revision: Two 41111, 3.3.3 Rate SL - Street Lighting Service Application Applicable to governmental entities for street lighting service to areas served at retail by Company. Not applicable to temporary,shared,standby,supplementary,maintenance,or resale service. Type of Service Single or three phase.60 hertz,at any of the Company's standard secondary or primary service voltages as required by Customer. Where existing distribution facilities are not adjacent to the point of delivery,additional charges and special contract arrangements between the Company and Customer may be required prior to its being furnished. If Customer takes service at primary voltage,Company may at its option meter service on the secondary side of Customer's transformers and adjust for transformer losses in accordance with Company's Tariff for Electric Service. Monthly Rate - Unmetered Facilities Customer Charge: S25.00 Luminaire Charge,per Luminaire Lamp Watts Lumens kWh Schedule Red- Post-Top A -te B C D angular Mercury Vapor P 175 7,900 70 $8.40 $16.50 $3.90 $2.65 S20.45 $13.00 rillir 400 21,000 150 512.35 S20.05 $7.30 $5.65 N.A. N.A. 1,000 63,000 370 $27.40 S36.10 S19.40 $13.90 N.A. N.A. Sodium Vapor ir 100 9,500 40 $7.55 S15.65 $3.00 $1.50 $20.60 S12.35 15O 16,000 70 . $9.50 $17.15 $4.65 $2.65 $25.65 N.A. 2(X) 22,000 80 $10.35 S17.95 $5.10 $3.00 S26.05 N.A. i 250 27,500 100 $10.90 $18.50 $5.85 $3.75 $26.55 N.A. 400 50,000 160 $15.50 $25.55 $9.25 $6.00 S38.75 N.A. 1,000 140,000 375 $30.05 $40.15 S21.05 $14.05 S52.45 N.A. Metal Halide 175 14,000 65 $10.15 $18.30 $5.50 $2.45 S22.85 S18.15 250 25,000 100 $12.93 S22.10 $7.48 S4.05 $33.22 N.A. 400 36.000 160 $15.70 $25.85 $9.45 $5.65 $43.55 N.A. 1,000 110,000 370 $28.75 $38.85 $20.70 $13.70 $53.25 N.A. Other Incandescent* All $7.55 Wallpack Mercury 250W $17.60 Vapor* Fluorescent* $21.50 Historical $21.30 *Closed to new street lighting installations • Fuel Cost: Plus an amount for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Rider FC. Power Cost: Plus an amount for purchased power cost calculated in accordance with Rider PCR. 1994 Texas Utilities Electric Company Rate Schedules 35 4` I I OFFICE TU ELECTRIC PAGE: 6 GRAPEVINE - STREET LIGHT DETAIL DATE: 07/27/95 OF SOUTHLAKE PAST DUE DATE: 08/15/95 S EET LIGHTING DESCRIPTION: STREET LIGHTS ACCT #: 600 2223 99 5 ADDRESS: STREET LIGHTS CITY: SOUTHLAKE QUANTITY RATE WATTS TYPE SCHEDULE DAYS KWH AMOUNT 117 SL 100 SV A 30 4,680 970.46 229 SL 175 MV A 30 16,030 2,221 .99 8 SL 250 SV A 30 800 102.09 31 SL 400 MV A 30 4,650 469 .41 CUSTOMER CHARGE 25.00 CURRENT MONTH BILL 3,788.95 COGENERATION POWER COST $.000311OO- PER KWH MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 0.00 ADJUSTMENT 0.00 SERVICE PERIOD FROM 06/27/95 TO 07/27/95 TOTAL AMT DUE 3,788.95 SUBTOTAL OF STREET LIGHTING $3,788.95 L 1 A 0 - 4 ,fit43 ' T `�`-? 5' i kiiir . • 083 3 2.- TRI-COUNTY . -nr ELECTRIC coopERATIvE, INC. 4,k. 444-3201 .c23-7234;!f 4.71-775711N3ranbuo 279-7010. 29-7011 " A PorverfurAlterWaiiie" YOUR PROMPT PAYMENTS ARE APPRECIATED. THANK YOU ,- • K W H .. ACCOUNT NO. METER MUI.T. PRESENT PREVIOUS RATE :. READING READING USED „ • 8140800 00000 • • 1 0 0 801 001 DETAIL OF ELECTRIC SERVICE FROM 7/13/95 TO 8/14/95 AS BILLED 8/14/95 •----% TOMER CHARGE 8. 00 ELECTRIC SERVICE • 1. 33 i•• : 092 SECURITY LIGHT 723. 13 TOTAL DUE 732. 46 i ' IF PAID AFTER 08/29/95 769. 08 , . -1 . ------ _, JD - - q." i L---H7-----, ) -, -, • , L . . . - m © HowErn) .. . . .... ,.. ,1 i . , ' SERVICE ADDRESS N CARROLL 667 PCRF ADJ. FACTOR $ . 0050000 CURRENT DELINQUENT AFTER 8/29/95 •(hir, •- . City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 5, 1995 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:00 P.M. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 21, 1995. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Consider ZA95-98,Rezoning for 9.857 acres of land situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey,Abstract No. 72, Tract 2A2. Location: 1835 N. Peytonville Ave (on the east side), approximately 2100 feet South of West Dove Road. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District; Requested Zoning: "SF- IA" Single Family Residential District. Owners/Applicants: Carleo and Regina Capili. SPIN Neighborhood#11. Public Hearing. 5. Consider: ZA95-99,Plat Showing for Lots 2 and 3 of the T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, being 9.857 acres of land situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72,Tract 2A2. Location: 1835 N. Peytonville Ave(on the east side), approximately 2100 feet South of West Dove Road. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural; Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single-Family Residential District. Owners/Applicants: Carleo and Regina Capili. SPIN Neighborhood#11. Public Hearing. 6. Consider: Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-D. Continue Public Hearing. 7. Consider: Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance 483-E regarding private streets. Public Hearing. 8. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE (60". I hereb y certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 • City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA OCTOBER 5, 1995 PAGE 2 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, September 29, 1995 at 5:00 p.m.,pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. unman, of SOU7;••, / / / AI Sandra L. LeGrand P City Secretary 41. S • .a} too If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. G:\WPF\MTGWGN\10-05-95.WPD City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting, October 3, 1995 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Resolution No. 95-27. Abandonment of an easement between Lots • 39 and 40. SouthRidge Lakes. As you can see from the dates on the letters from Mr. and Mrs. Morgan and Mr. and Mrs. Brennan dated in April, 1995, this request has been on the burner for some time. The item first surfaced when Jode Wilson, 585 N. Peytonville, rezoned her property from AG to SF-30 in September/October, 1994. Ms. Wilson wanted to provide sewer to her property through the easement on Donley Court. The property owners objected because of the number of large oak trees located in the easement. Although the developers of SouthRidge Lakes dedicated the easement through the platting process for the purpose of extending the sewer line, they chose not to construct the sewer because of the trees. Following the presentation by Messrs. Morgan and Brennan at the City Council meeting in September, 1994, the City Council requested staff to make the sewer service available to the property through an extension of the sewer in Myers Meadow to Peytonville. i ' Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Cy, Page 2 This has been accomplished. Therefore, there is no need for the easement on Donley Court. Although some trees will be affected through the Peytonville extension of the sewer line to the property, the trees will be adjacent to the benefitted property, thus encouraging the property owner to take steps to protect the trees. Staff recommends City Council adopt the resolution to abandon the easement as requested by the property owners on Donley Court. 2. Agenda Item No. 5B. Resolution No. 95-39. setting the Public Hearing date to discuss (kr proposed Land Use Assumptions for Southlake Impact Fee Study, This will be the first step in bringing to the City Council and the public the City's proposed update to the impact fees. The land use assumption report included in your packet will be the basis for both the roadway and the water/wastewater impact fees. Please call Tom Elgin at ext 753 if you have any questions about the report. We are taking a little longer with our impact fee update than anticipated, however, we are concerned that we consider all the implications of the newly adopted roadway impact fee due to the scrutiny we can expect from the Builders Association of Fort Worth and Tarrant County. (See item 18 below.) 3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Resolution No. 95-40. making appointments to the Southlake Youth Advisory Council. Note in the memo from Kathleen Farrell that selections were made 1 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 3 based on objective criteria. A number of people, including school representatives, were involved in the selection. The officers indicated in Section 3 of the resolution were selected by secret ballot from the membership in attendance at the SYAC meeting last Tuesday, September 26, 1995. Note, there are vacancies in grade 7 and grade 11. We are still taking applications and subsequent recommendations will be made for these appointments at a later meeting, however, we wanted to proceed with these appointments so the youth will know the status of there applications to date. 4. FAVnda Item No. 7A. Ordinance No. 480-181. 2nd reading (ZA 95-79). Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park. Current Zoning is I-1 Light Industrial District. requested zoning is SF-20A Single Family Residential District. There have been no significant changes in this item since City Council approval of the first reading 4-1. Note that the packet contains a reduction of the same concept plan and related review summary as the previous approval. 5. Agenda Item No. 8A. Ordinance No. 480-179. 1st Reading (ZA 95-73). Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana-Residential. This item is substantially the same as when tabled at the September 19, 1995 City Council meeting. As you are aware, we have received a considerable number of calls regarding this item, in particular the multi-family component of the proposal. The calls are summarized in a table attached to the memo from Karen (hoe Gandy. As of packet time, the opposition does not exceed the 20% required for a supermajority vote, and is not likely to since generally the opposition is not from the I Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 4 immediate vicinity of the project. Note that MTP has submitted a letter(attached as page 8A-7 to Karen Gandy's memo) which requests amendments to the proposal included in the submittal you were previously given. Recall the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 6-0-1. FYI, attached to this memo is a copy of the newspaper article concerning the Wednesday night SPIN meeting on the MTP proposal, and a handout which SPIN Chair Rex Potter had available at the meeting. L6. Agenda Item No.8B. Ordinance No. 480-180. 1st Reading (ZA 95-74). Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana-Non Residential. This item is as tabled at the September 19 meeting. We have not received as many calls pertaining to this item. There is a multi-family component in this PUD which is part of the permitted 10% ancillary uses which has also been a point of discussion. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 4-2-1. Note the letter from MTP (pg. 8B-6)addressing comments in the staff review summary. 7. Agenda Item No. 8C. Ordinance No. 480-182. 1st Reading (ZA 95-83). Rezoning and Concept Plan for Meadow Ridge Estates. 37.461 acres. Current zoning is AG. requested (kir zoning is SF-20A. The main issue with this request is the fact that the LUP designates this area as low density residential, and the proposal is for medium density. There are mixed 1 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 5 opinions from the surrounding land owners. Generally, those in Woodland Heights are opposed and those along Kimball are mixed. Note that the opposition component is greater than the 20%requirement,therefore there is a requirement of the supermajority 3/4 vote by City Council in order to approve the request. We have been told by the developer that they have met with some of the people in opposition and have convinced them to remove their opposition,however,we have received no letters from these people waiving their opposition as of packet time. There are no significant technical issues with the Concept Plan as submitted. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-2-1 with the dissenting votes being concerned about the noncompliance with the LUP designation. L 8. Agenda Item No. 8D. Ordinance No. 480-183. 1st Reading (ZA 95-88). Rezoning for 3.38 acres. Current zoning is AG. requested zoning is SF-lB. Location is the west side of private street. Marantha Way. There have been no written responses related to this request. There are some unique circumstances regarding this request and similar requests on private streets which we will explain in executive session. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. 9. Agenda Item No. 8E. ZA 95-89. Plat Revision of Lots 1R1. and 1R2. Block A. Commerce Business Park. The only issue with this plat is the staff recommendation for a common access easement along the south line of lot 1R1 to provide access to Commerce (110., Street for the east lot. The applicant, Randy Pack, has provided a letter requesting that this requirement be waived due to his intent to provide lot 1R2 access via his existing driveway Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 6 just east of the lot. This may be appropriate in that it limits access along FM 1709 to the existing driveway. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. 10. Agenda Item No. 8F. ZA 95-90. Site Plan for an Office Complex for Dr. Timothy Huckabee. This is one of the projects which was approved during the development of the Corridor Overlay Zone. It has always been Dr. Huckabee's intent to meet the requirements of the overlay zone. The staff Site Plan Review Summary points out three problems (Nos. 2,3,4) in meeting the corridor ordinance or the driveway ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that the plan as submitted,was the best that could be done given the circumstances of the lot, thus P/Z waived the two corridor requirements and directed staff to work out the configuration of the common access easement for the driveway. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. 11. Agenda Item No. 8G. ZA 95-85. Concept Plan for Southlake Retail Center. Drews Realty Group. General Partners. This project must comply with the requirements of the corridor overlay zone with a few exceptions which might impact the buildable area of the platted lot. There are some conflicts with the requirements of the corridor study as noted in comment nos. 1 and 3A of the Concept Plan Review Summary. There are also some conflicts with the driveway ordinance as noted in comment nos. 2A and 2B. P/Z also recommended waiving these requirements with the modifications as noted in the memo from Karen Gandy. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 7 FYI,the attorneys have formulated an opinion on the factors that determine whether or not certain projects must conform to the requirements of the newly adopted corridor study (i.e. the "vesting" issue). We will elaborate on this opinion in executive session. 12. Agenda Item No. 8H. ZA 95-94. Site Plan for Scholtzsky's. Many of the issues in this site plan overlap with the previous discussion on the Concept Plan. Note particularly item no. 11 in the review summary related to the building articulation. This will be our first discussion related to the interpretation of this requirement in the corridor overlay zone. P/Z Cie recommended approval of the building as submitted. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. 13. Agenda Item No. 8I. ZA 95-70. Plat Showing for Lots 1. 2. and 3. W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition. current zoning is C-2. There are no significant issues with this plat submittal. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 6-0. 14. Agenda Item No. 8J. Ordinance No. 480-184. 1st Reading (ZA 95-95). Rezoning for 3.678 acres. Current zoning is AG. requested zoning is SF-1A. Applicant Joseph and Kimiela Mortazani. There are no unresolved issues related to this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. L Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 8 15. Agenda Item No. 8K. ZA 95-96. Plat Showing of Lots 6 and 7.J.G. Allen No. 18 Addition. Applicant Joseph and Kimiela Mortazani. There are no significant issues with this plat submittal. Note the staff review comments that we need an exhibit to verify the location of any buildings. The purpose here is to ensure that encroachments are not created with this plat. We do not have a letter yet but it is our understanding that the only existing structures either have been removed or will be removed prior to construction of a new home. This should be verified with the applicant at the Council meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. 16. Agenda Item No. 8L. ZA 95-76.Preliminary Plat for Village Center. It is our understanding that Mr. Don Silverman will be attempting to meet with individual Councilmembers very soon. Recall at the meeting last Tuesday night, September 26 (the continuation of the September 19th meeting), that Mr. Silverman will not be available to meet October 3, however, he would be able to meet October 10. He has submitted a letter to this effect, included in your packet. We have scheduled him on this agenda knowing that we will need to continue the meeting to October 10 due to time constraints and length of the agenda. Mr. Silverman is aware of this. L I Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 9 We have included in the packet the same material as previously forwarded, including a reduction of the same plat as previously discussed. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 5-2. 17. Agenda Item No. 10A. Variance request to Ordinance No. 483-C, Section 501 (H) (1) by Terry Wilkinson for a driveway on Continental Blvd. The information included in your packet is the same as that presented last time. Terry Wilkinson came by the office on Thursday and was informed that his item was on the agenda for Tuesday, October 3. (Iry OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 18. FYI -- The Tarrant County Builders Association has approached a big name local government consultant in the area about the possibility of conducting an independent "audit" of development fees in selected cities. The consultant has made us aware that the group is interested in focusing attention on Southlake, Keller and Mansfield. The full scope of the proposed study is not really known, however, the association has said it is interested in learning more about how fees are determined and used, and has indicated that it believes we are using development fees to "prop up" the general fund. Chapter 395 of the LGC authorizes impact fees "...in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to new development." Using impact fees to pay for improvements needed for "old" developments are not permitted. (kr You will recall that the Builders Association commissioned an independent study which was prepared by the University of Texas at Arlington. An excerpt from this report is Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Le Page 10 attached, along with a letter received in my office last week. I will be responding to the letter in detail in the next few days, after I have had time to review it with our attorney. (We will copy the entire document and disseminate it to you by Tuesday night.) Given the wording and tone of the attached documents and the interest in an "audit," I feel reasonably sure that we will be hearing more from this group in the near future. References to exclusionary zoning and discriminatory actions give some indication of the approach the Association may be taking to attack our development regulations. They are serious, and we should take them seriously. It has been focussing on Southlake for the last three years, but this is the first time the Association has taken steps to position itself for a challenge to our development fees. L 19. Adventure Alley Construction went great! Thousands of volunteers dedicated hours of their free time to working on the project, which turned out very well. FYI, organizers are planning to continue to work this weekend to finish up some of the items not yet completed. Feel free to drop by the site if you would like to help or to simply "check out" the project. 20. Master Plan Updates - In an effort to alert SPIN members to upcoming issues as early as possible, tentative timelines have been developed to guide updates to the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan and the Southlake Parks, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan. A tentative schedule (attached) has been provided to the SPIN Standing Committee. Staff will work to keep SPIN informed about any changes to the schedule. Questions about the updating process should be directed to Tom Elgin and Kim McAdams, respectively. 21. A preliminary site plan and construction schedule has been developed for the planned public works facility at N. White Chapel and Bob Jones Road. We are working with Cheatham and Associates to develop the site plan for submittal to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The zoning change request, preliminary plat, and site plan are scheduled to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 11 come before P&Z at the November 9 meeting. It should then come before City Council at the second meeting in November. A copy of the preliminary site plan and construction schedule are attached. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Bob Whitehead or Greg Last. 22. 1995 All-America City Application Update -- We recently received a letter from the National Civic League with an evaluation of our 1995 application. It summarizes information drawn from the application and the Screening Committee's deliberations and written comments. We will use the evaluation to assist in preparing for the 1996 competition. A copy of the evaluation is attached. In general, the comments are very favorable. L 23. City Council/SPIN Standing Committee Joint Meeting will be held on Thursday, October 26 at Solana Education Center from 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The SPIN Standing Committee will hold their work session from 6:30 to 7:30 p.m., then break for a reception. The schedule is as follows: 6:30 -- 7:30 p.m. SPIN Standing Committee Work Session 7:30 -- 8:00 p.m. SPIN/City Council Reception 8:00 -- 9:00 p.m. SPIN/City Council Joint Work Session Please make plans to attend. The Standing Committee will present their self-evaluation, 1995-96 Goals and Objectives, and then will allow time for open discussion on any item of interest to Council or SPIN members. If there are any specific items you would like on the agenda, please contact Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager. 24. FYI, the City of Grapevine has approached us with a fleet and warehouse services proposal. They are attempting to utilize their Municipal Service Center to capacity. We are studying the proposal and comparing the costs and benefits of Grapevine's proposal to our current service providers. Questions about the proposal may be directed to Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager. I Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 12 25. Visit to Dallas Stars Hockey Center at Valley Ranch -- will be Thursday, October 5 at 9:30a.m. Although Mr. Perna indicated to me last week that he would adjust his schedule to whatever time the City Council needed, his secretary has indicated that this is the time he has available. I recall that City Council indicated it preferred the afternoon. Perhaps if enough of you cannot make the early morning time, then Mr. Perna will find a way to adjust his schedule. Sandy will call you Monday to see if you can attend. We could meet here and ride together. 26. Note the attached letter from Greg Last to Bill Wimberley at TxDOT Fort Worth concerning developments along SH 114 in Southlake. This is something we have started to keep them aware of developments which will impact future right-of-way costs for the project. (lese 27. Note the two letters attached concerning dogs at loose and the disappearance of small animals in the neighborhoods around Shady Lane. Director Campbell will be contacting the individuals concerning the letters. While there may be dogs roaming loose in the area, I doubt that dogs are responsible for the incidents described by the Pattersons. Coyotes are more likely the culprit. In any case, the discharge firearms in the neighborhood is extremely dangerous. Campbell will work with the individuals to see what we can do. 28. Note the letter to Mayor Fickes from Gary Hargett concerning the unsuccessful mediation attempt. This letter was copied to John Lively. Note also the letter from the TML attorneys representing the City of Southlake to Mr. Lively. 29. Recall the public appearance by Richard Penn last Council meeting concerning the traffic intersection at Highland and Carroll. He has indicated that he wants to be on an agenda to discuss the resolution of the problem, and has indicated that he will not go away until m,, the problem at the intersection has been corrected. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest September 29, 1995 Page 13 He has also requested a traffic officer be stationed at the intersection during school hours to direct traffic. We have told him this is not possible given our current staffing levels. Staff is researching the situation, however, the solution will require the alignment of the offset where Highland crosses Carroll. City Council in establishing the bond project priorities scheduled the improvement of Highland from Carroll to Kimball for FY96-97. This will be the opportunity to align the intersection if City Council wishes. Should City Council want to substitute this project for another in the 95-96 fiscal year, please let us know. In the meantime, there is not much that we can do to correct the problem. For the record, the offset at Highland and White Chapel creates more of a problem than the one at Carroll. Cy' Expect Mr. Penn to be in attendance at subsequent Council meetings until he gets what he wants. CEH/kb L NEWS CLIPPING L Source: Fort Worth Star Telegram Date: 9/28/95 Southbke queriesi developer on-apartments Tom Allen,a partner in the Cali- y •BYBARBARAPOWELL 1 fornia-based developer's firm, 5 Fort Worth Star-Telegram tried to assure residents that Magu- SOUTHLAKE -:About 100 ire Thomas and IBM are commit- ;.residents grilled developer Magu- ted:to quality-development that ire Thomas Partners on why the will fit into existing"-neighbor- : company wants to build the.city's hoods. y first multifamily housing com- He said that the city allows a plexes. • . maximum of 12 multifamily units :Opponents said allowing:multi- per acre and thatMaguire Thomas ', familyy,E housing will overcrowd would be ,willing,to limit apart- schools;i overburden roads and ments to seven or eight per.acre. lower property values. White saying.the plans are prelimi- Vy4concern is total gridlock nary, he outlined 4`project•.„that along-•Texas,114 in the morning,' would include up to 184-single-1 (or esidenr Eleanor McDermott said last night during the meeting at the family houses and up to':200multi- Carroll High School cafeteria: family units. i The,meeting, sponsored by the i The 200 units would include a Southlake, Program for the Im- combination of apartments,' du- provementof Neighborhoods,was plexes and houses on -6,000- called to give Maguire Thomas,co- square-foot lots. - :developer with•1$M of the nearby The City Council considered the Solana office park,a chance to de- developer's request at its Sept. 5 ry tail.its:•lane. :_J meeting. But Maguire Thomas Thc,:maj ty of residents -last asked that the decision be post- ni T to oppose the , poned when it became clear the lagr.FT. icht ould;mix apart- Y"'VIM_vant iid 'olai ,::Ty men ''•u•1 eaad si a-famil ce � i . r e matte housingvnl ndjustnorthofTexas at itslTuesda011. r` s, ;;- ,::114 Maguire Thomas'officials say they-need to offer a mix of housing styles to satisfy the needs of corpo-, rate tenants at Solana. T L. ; /! � SOUTHLAKE PROGRAM SPIN ilk FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS 411 "Citizens Serving Citizens" September 27, 1995 SPIN Neighbors: There have been various flyers distributed by individuals within the City expressing their views on the proposed Maguire Thomas Partners (MTP) re-zoning requests for property located in the northwest portion of Southlake. The zoning requests and subsequent public hearings have been on-going since early August. Currently, MTP has requested that both of their re-zoning requests be tabled until the 3 October City Council meeting. SPIN has tried to be proactive towards informing Southlake citizens of these activities by holding a public meeting between MTP and Southlake residents on 10, August. Based upon the current influx of questions, it is prudent to answer some of the recent factual oriented questions herein: What is a PUD (Planned Unit Development)? A PUD is a zoning district that is unique to a certain property and often involves some level of flexibility on the part of the developer and the City Council. It typically involves a variety of permitted uses included in multiple districts rather than one single zoning district. There are currently two types of PUD's within Southlake, residential and non- residential. The principal uses allowed within a PUD are residential or non-residential respectively, however there may be allowed up to 10% of the area as "ancillary uses". Ancillary uses may include uses other than the principle use, i.e. residential zoning (single family or multi-family) within a non-residential PUD. A residential PUD is limited to a maximum density of 2.18 dwelling units per gross acre of land and must provide 10% of the site as open space for public and/or private use. The intent of the PUD is to create a "win-win"relationship between City and the developer. The City-benefits by having open space provided within the development whereas the developer benefits by having flexibility in certain development criteria due to the unique aspects of the site. Examples of existing PUD's include Timarron, Timber Lake, Stone Lakes, Lonesome Dove Estates, Monticello Estates, and Myers Meadow. What property has been requested to be re-zoned? Two re-zoning requests have been made by MTP; (1) ZA95-73, Re-zoning and Concept Plan .for Solana (Residential) and (2) ZA95-74, Re-zoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Non-Residential). The property to be split into two PUD's is located Northeast of LS.H.114, East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove Street, and West of North White Chapel Boulevard. 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-6796 or Metro (817) 481-0036 1 .. Page 2of3 ci) What is the property's current zoning? This land is currently zoned C-3, CS, PUD with principal zoning of C-3 (General Commercial) and CS (Community Service). What is the proposed Land Use Designation per the Master Land Use Plan? The Land Use Plan identifies this property as Mixed Use which states "The appropriate activities for these designated Mixed Use tracts are office buildings, hotels, and commercial and retail centers that serve local and regional needs. Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those described in Public parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density residential and Medium Density Residential categories described above". What zoning changes have been requested and are there any deviations from standard district zoning? The proposed Residential PUD contains 199.2 acres of gross area with 161.1 acres of residential area, 21.1 acres of common area, and 18.0 acres of right-of-way (ROW) . The Residential PUD could contain up to 434 dwellings inclusive of the following four Product Types: Product Type "A" Single Family Detached (15,000 s.f. minimum lot size) Product Type "B" Single Family (smaller lot, single family detached) Product Type "C" Two Family Dwellings Product Type "D" Multiple Family Dwellings The developer has proposed the Product Type "A"residences to be throughout the majority of the Residential PUD while Product Types "B", "C", and "D"are to be limited to the northwest area of the Residential PUD (approximately 36 acres). The proposed Residential PUD requests ancillary uses, up to 10%, with zoning classifications of C-3 (General Commercial) and CS (Community Service). The proposed C-3 zoning will exclude the sale of tires, batteries, and auto accessory sales. 1. y g 3 3 r 0 v co o `< o 0 0 0 -n D 7 N 7 7 7 < CDI w 0 N N COc r• H 023 0 0 7 c dO 0 m •-•• to < W D N 0 O ON07 0 0 m N N N o Z r• Nt o " > ° 0 0 N -w Oi P. f.. N so toO Z D VI V a co" 0 0 N.a N.•aa .a O a.a a so 0• Nm •Na W t• 06-s to O is .Oa G N N ZI to j 0 C F. j 0 C C c 0 c p O N 7 • c > > c o3 0 0 Cm G* 3Y 3Y GY G^ 013 H ; O a a 0 a a m 0 '� M 0 A 3: C O A O O 4 a. Z s13 „ 0 a ? D rz e.4 m Xcri D v`n A) « w P w O W tn 7 Cl) N0 N N 0.04 N O y ON N O_i.•.•0 O O (.1 C 0 •000 0 0 °00 000 0 3 0 •• 0 St a a a _...;a i. a.o a .0 COri> ...h P SpP P P Pr"� P P 0 r 'D 0 a• '°' 00 SDT co = a s M a a a 14 Z Z Z W Pt Po P± 42 o > > > tnr-D CD O . °m 0 a Q. 0 r NN 3 0 0 p Nq a'g G o ••O! 6•0` A/ q G O m g is g 3 W 3 r0r �o a a0 7 a c c �• v 0 o ac Cmq� moo w a 0 3 co 3 C o �tc = Z! u ni.N a v^4 4 0 oOO N U. i •N O! G O A0 v, N13 0 7 0 3 7 C 7 x 0' d 0 N —N N N .a N N N N O.0 4 f rt 4 za cRft q ;.10 o c 5 g h 0> m N 6a 00 1 =o y�•<N -, .• .a o a« am a F ° CD oxi a • a �^ C C 0 0 0 0 o a ooa a - 0 su rzoo y co 3 r•h o? G Na 7 Q G (0 el G 0 0 7 Rns ^ � C= *3.0 N o S` `j E. y • 6. a W a O N N a Y N N I V OC N C O O N o 0 •000 O 0O $i G,tc 0 ra a 00 D_•i! 7a =Qa a aN'—a a oo • P ZP P P P• P as o p 3 • N N Ol a. 03 aa� r�P 3 c • O!as O!as it OI O!as V!U1 q N U.N E 7 cn 30 3a 3a 3 » 3 30 3 , =cd 10 0. • " .0. x 1 M 1. x : K O Y O ?, o cD _. X u ?` w x a n 3 (7 a a m a a a a P.B.c ' 7 o 4 4 Z 4 N^4 1 4 e• A > en cuo 0 y N u C < r. X o 0 3 co 0 61 C CO co 2cn { E & $ 2 00 E a 0 _ '\ /* { La ° #m © a \ ccZin in 22c) c: , — b 0rP fq 2 //ƒ 2 ; ) ■ 2 ; ;; \;ex g; aE 7 e0 00 N■ 2m wmese el■ 0e - 2 E Ek1 ® ® ® e e — C < 0 a \ \ \ \ cc\ b a Al Al - - - - § a 2 A| � / \ Al Al § - ' ` (4 S N ` P. §. k£ . O-X(4 b£A OXNa Q�@g N a. & Ce a2ac k k @ » b m @ k k .0 .0u.» �$$ K ■ k-■w mks ■ � @ a - in ■ CI b _ _ ; § ._ {{ _ a _d E E k /}te/ eve 43 -,e -%e ista - 0. - s ©=;I ;■_ ■■� ■■r. ■w $k ■ E a® - a-J 2 « k §e §® �e § 2 - - � • _ . I A . . .N ® ® ® s� co � C , co co on o o co ° - � �� .ed 'a <�co ) ) § a 2. ° Z 2 { z z ) 3 2 �ƒ ` § a � c )� _ c ©� c § § ]q 0 cc -_"12 aGn "In .'In . , _ �Fo. -- os ka . —} is , �a - @ I § ! . -2a - - - - - §/ 7 } a S. & , ; a. \ o " QS I. a E 2 c13 ® e = ` i ) j Jl k } \ § § \ w > EEEE'-aoEES'_sL v 9 v ;o ca m olizo2;tc Ssf.w c 0 e O fl! N O O w Y$nl=a ca t:~�": M c O c 3 •�c •n a O 7 ;_ RT y ..4,0 m x .. w aait3;aeyg 'l 3.4 3� r.�� �� c a o a=�-' qp n a �-a o o 0 iS .4wg4 .?-�' � a 0 asp a'p N naaS a., g6 n W > W o Eg$Q•a,E _ IA a F q� 3G.• £!zQrt V a sirw5,„-v4U . Y O g; n n 8• oo N• N• N N tt 'wu� VI O..N i. Pill"3� a u Y as O toA f! G") sr: S N ON • 3 3 N $t 1 • : ; mco m A 3•: 4 w W O N 7 a a a -, N 7 At c n • c 1`o co rc Q2 N N $R DO a • a o 0 ° a S y 0" �g u n it u q O) ..► 0 S• 0 0 It coO O O g O O a a 3 M N N a 1. N 7 Fe -w O r 0 r 0 0 N D D. D D N .O to m A •. • M C • 1 OO ct O Q °N V!O 0.3 3 3 c co j a _ D o a a 0 3 m 5- • O 0 - $ N U.! 7I coy Q a 4 DJ c ..► D0 (4 O y St cn . 'G a n y`m m a u a . , ;3 N c .0 - NI p al -. _ _ C (p • a ' N O o G N a o obi X cp a.4 w .` N N N a O 3 N D"I 5 N N 3 C m o c • 3 co c •• H a A.01 a N 0. W 3 3 3N 2c m m c x= 3 N 3 N CD —.x O O nO • . - X ' S C f M m N ^`a 3 `li .1141) u N,QN u A N W O • asa=0 CDO O 0 LI w n• o e e O d cIA"c vN fD o 3 ao« 3 a3 <n m -• c co Q e e m :_. - 3 BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF FORT WORTH&TA.RR1\T COUNTY' 1945.1995 <,:zrdl;tfrn-_5rflirl.Sc:S L i a 1 v s7 tip►"'-�. BUILDERS ASSOCIATION P of fort worth & tarrant county0 .. % September 20, 1995 YEARS Curtis Hawk ��I n a� = 1 ,rj; 1% City Manager I G t '•i City of Southlake �� SEP 2 21996 - 667 South Carroll Avenue ' J Southlake,TX 76092 OFFICE el 1 tiANarsR Dear Mr. Hawk: The Builders Association of Fort Worth and Tarrant County(BA)is greatly concerned that layers of excessive regulation at all levels of government can add 20 to 35 percent to the cost of a new home,making it difficult or even impossible for families to achieve home ownership. Certainly, it is becoming ridiculous the way in which the federal government forces restrictions on developers because of concerns about endangered species and"alleged" wetlands. However, closer to home,we are chagrined that development/impact fees,restrictive and exclusionary L zoning and excessive subdivision standards are making homes unaffordable. In fact, in many instances,we believe home owners are being unfairly taxed twice,without their knowledge. Enclosed is an article initiated by Fort Worth Star-Telegram reporter Mark Leach which gives an overview of the situation in Tarrant County. A copy of the independent study commissioned by the Builders Association has been mailed to your mayor. Given the interest expressed by consumers and the media,we really believe it is long past time for us as professionals in our field to make ourselves available to city staffs in a collaborative effort to balance cost versus benefits. We understand the funding challenges facing cities today. However,we also realize that without growth, our area would stagnate and all of us would suffer. Should you have any questions about our position in regard to government fees and regulations, or if you would like to schedule a meeting with representatives of the Builders Association, please call our Executive Vice President,Jerry Eisner, CAE,at 817/457-2864. We assure you we want to help you develop sensible,appropriate and balanced guidelines in regard to new home construction in your city. Sincerely yours s/ Ken Kerr (irriPresident ROF MEMBER OF: O6464 BRENTWOOD STAIR ROAD • FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76112 °F"' (817) 457-2864 • METRO (817) 429-3472 • FAX(817) 457-2870WP°C.4" *TEXAS TON 4�u�1M —w— BUILDERS ill ' . 1111 MILDEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES 1111 FOR CONSTRUCTION CI TIES CONSTR N IN CITI S 111 OF IIImac TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS III BUILDERS I ASSOCIATION OF FORT WORTH & TARRANT COUNTY IIIBUILDERS' ASSOCIATION OF FORT WORTH AND TARRANT COUNTY U 6464 Brentwood Stair Road Fort Worth, Texas 76112 III Prepared ... P by: illUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING 11111 SCHOOL OF URBAN AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 601 Nedderman Drive, 5th Floor 144 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76019-0588 1111 PI Project Team: Joel B. Goldsteen, Ph.D. , AICP, NCARB ill Kelly Snook James E. Sellards I. Anthony I. Cochran 11/1 January 31 , 1995 NC Pi 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION IN CITIES OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 1 . Construction and impact fees are required by cities to off- set municipal costs arising from added or remodeled build- ings. Most commonly, the fees cover city expenditures for site and building inspections, and road and other infra- structure improvements. Most recently, building permit fees have had development impact fees added - making for in- creased construction costs. In some cities of Tarrant County, the fees appear to be excessive, burdensome to de- velopers, and ultimately drivers of increased housing sales prices for consumers . The higher prices result in a phe- nomenon of a rapidly closing housing market wherein fewer families and individuals can afford to purchase a new or pre-owned home. As a result, low and moderate income home ownership is becoming very difficult. 2. The cities of Tarrant County vary greatly in their construction and development impact fees. At the high end, Keller, Southlake, Saginaw, Benbrook, and Richland Hills >: range from $ 50, 138 . 40 for eight 2, 000 square foot homes to lows of $ 27, 293. 40 in Richland Hills. For one home only, the combined fees in these five cities vary from $ 6, 267 . 30 • Cto $ 3, 411. 68 - a very wide range. . For eight 2, 500 square foot homes, at the high end, Keller, Southlake, Saginaw, Benbrook, and Richland Hills range from $ 53, 538 . 40 to lows of $ 28, 693.40. For one home only, the combined fees in these five cities vary from $ 6, 692 .30 to $3, 586. 68 - a very wide range. 4 . By contrast to the highest five cities, the combined fees for the bottom five cities for eight 2, 000 square foot homes: West Worth, Wautauga, Newark, Bedford, and Pelican _y Bay (note: Kennedale has been omitted for the purposes of this item) - range from $ 7, 360. 00 to $ 2, 612. 00. (For in- dividual homes of this size, those cities range from $ 920.00 to $ 326. 50) . 5. For the bottom five cities of White Settlement, Wautauga, Westworth Village, Newark, and Pelican Bay, for 2, 500 square foot homes the range for 8 dwelling units is $ 8, 270.00 to $ 3,252.00. For individual homes of this size, those cities range from $ 1, 033.75 to $ 406.50. L BUILDERS ASSOCIATION-PROPRIETARY. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ES-1 4 6. Average combined fees for eight 2, 000 square foot homes in III the top five most expensive cities is $ 34, 199. 95. If dl Keller is not included, the next top five cities have an average of $ 29, 738 .27 with a high of $ 35, 936. 00 and a low of $ 27, 230. 00 . The average of the top ten is $ 29, 838 .20 with Keller included, and without Keller that average is $ 27, 060.72 . 7 . Average combined fees for eight 2, 500 square foot homes in the top five most expensive cities is $ 36, 859. 15. If Keller is not included, the next top five cities have an average of $ 31, 878 . 19 with a high of $ 39, 836. 00 and a low of $ 28, 633. 60. The average of the top ten is $ 32, 236. 12 with Keller included, and without Keller that average is $ 29, 415. 17 . 8 . On a per dwelling unit basis for 2, 000 square foot dwell- "! fees for the top five cities average (excluding Keller at $ 6, 267. 30) are $ 3, 717 .29. If Keller is added, this average for the top five cities increases to $ 4, 290. 00. 9. On a per dwelling unit basis for 2, 500 square foot dwell- ings, fees for the top five cities average (excluding Keller at $ 6, 692. 30) are $ 3, 984 .77 . When Keller is added, this average for the top five cities increases to $ 4, 607 .39. I FOR 2,000 SQUARE FEET PER DWELLING UNITS AT 8 LOTS/DEVELOPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION FEES ONLY (BUILDING PERMITS, ETC. ) : 10. The average of the highest five fees charged for the total lot is $ 16, 031 .25 - with the per dwelling unit fees at $ 2, 003. 91. The highest fees were charged by Benbrook at $ 2, 783.43 per dwelling unit - then, Everman, Hurst, Lakeside, and Crowley at $ 1, 515. 00. 11 . The average of the highest ten fees charged for the total eight lots is $ 13, 115. 18, and on a per dwelling unit basis, 11 the charge is $ 1, 639.40. The second five in descending order are Forest Hill, Pantego, Haltom City, Keller, and Colleyville at $ 1, 186.50 per dwelling unit. 111 12. The lowest five, including White Settlement and Kennedale which together reported no building construction fees, were r Newark, Fort Worth, and Westworth - at $ 170.00 per dwelling unit and $ 920. 00 for the total eight dwelling unit development. The average including White Settlement and Kennedale is $ 79. 90 per dwelling unit. Not including White Settlement and Kennedale, and including Burleson and Pelican BUILDERSASSOCIATION-PROPRIETARY. EXE TIVE SUMM1RY. ES-2 r EXECUTIVE r I!Bay at $ 281 . 50 per dwellingunit, the average dwelling unit price is $ 192 . 20. The average fees for the total eight lot development is $ 1, 537 . 60. 13. The lowest ten cities including White Settlement and Ken- nedale, and add Dalworthington Gardens, Arlington, and grand Prairie at $ 775. 00 per house. The average including. White Settlement and Kennedale for the total development is $ 2, 161. 60, and the single dwelling unit at $ 270.20. 14 . The lowest ten, not including White Settlement and Kennedale is $ 3, 502 . 40 for the eight lots of homes, and $ 437 . 80 for each dwelling unit. FOR 2,500 SQUARE FEET PER DWELLING UNITS AT 8 LOTS/DEVELOPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION FEES ONLY (BUILDING PERMITS, ETC. ) : 15. The top five cities having the highest fees are Benbrook, Everman, Lakeside, Hurst, and Lake Worth. The average cost for the total development is $ 17, 893 . 57 . The fees for a single dwelling unit are $ 2, 236.70. 16. In the top ten, the next five in order are: Forest Hill, Crowley, Haltom City, Keller, and Pantego. The average cost for the total development is $ 14, 811 . 14, and for a single dwelling unit - $ 1, 815.40. 17. The lowest five in the 2, 500 square foot size were the same lowest five as the 2, 000 square foot size. The fees re- mained the same . 18. The lowest ten cities, in descending order after Burleson, Dalworthington Gardens, Pelican Bay, Arlington, and Grand Prairie are at $ 775. 00 per dwelling unit. 19. If White Settlement and Kennedale are not included, the av- erage total eight lot development is $ 3, 602 . 40, and $ 475.30 for a dwelling unit. Including Euless at $ 1, 006.50 per dwelling unit and Bedford at $ 1, 009. 50 per dwelling unit. (re .n„ BUILDERS ASSOCIATION-PROPRIETARY. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ES-3 . . H III , , I DISCLAIMER IIIThe following report is based on information gathered dur- ing 1994 from 38 cities in Tarrant County, Texas. It was no III small feat to collect this information, and the researchers con- gratulate any homebuilder attempting to obtain information in advance of building plans for some of the cities . While most cities were quite cooperative, a number were uncooperative, dif- illficult, obstinate, and unpleasant to work with. For this reason, our researchers had mailed those tables pertaining to a city to 1111 that city for their review, comments, and corrections. The final report contains this confirmed information. When a city did not reply, we phoned as a follow-up and sent a final memo of request. III METHODS OF COLLECTING INFORMATION II L Personal interviews were conducted with officials from each city, either in person or by phone. The list of contacts are presented in the appendix of this report. Sample forms were III mailed or faxed to each city with our requests to review and complete them as pertaining to their city. After collection, the data was analyzed and' developed to be comparable. This task re- '. quired assuming an eight lot group of homes in order to assign costs for development impact fees, off-site city costs, and other required fees . All fees were assumed to be one time costs, al- l! though some fees may be charged multiple times or only under some circumstances . The eight lot group became the basis for assign- ing fees to a single dwelling unit of both 2, 000 square feet and ill 2, 500 square feet. This method was assumed to be optimum, given the wide range of premises and criteria for fees used by the many different cities. Each set of fees developed for a city had been IIIverified by letter using phone and fax memo follow-up requests. III ill BUILDERS ASSOCIATION-PROPRIETARY. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ES-4 ill 1 L CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION IN CITIES OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 1 . PURPOSE OF THE REPORT A. THE ASSIGNMENT: A survey of construction permit fees was performed during Fall 1994 for all 38 Tarrant County cities. Findings were developed in tabular format and analyzed using basic and statis- tical methods. The report contains summaries of secondary source information, original data developed from field surveys, and tabular analyses to determine current fee patterns. What had be- gun as a survey of solely development impact fees was expanded to include construction fees, such as building permit fees, water and sewer hook up fees, electrical inspections, etc. This addi- - tional information was essential to obtain a complete picture about city fees for this county' s cities. The single-family and multi-family housing production problems arise from market demand, construction costs, mortgage interest rates, and builders' interest cost carry on the land. s housing costs rise, more city residents may be forced into ental markets. Home ownership may become more difficult in spite of normal inflation rates. Construction costs rise with the addition of any cost increases from product supplies to labor costs to city fees or inflation; and, fewer may find new owner- ship housing of their desired type within their budgets. Slower housing sales drive more people to rental housing, just as rental housing gains higher occupancies. At that time, added city fees and the same factors affecting single family housing production I begin to retard the construction of additional multi-family dwelling units. Housing affordability is tied to construction and develop- ment impact fees, also. As developers and builders begin to pay more up front fees for building permits and infrastructure, studies indicate that these sellers pass on their added costs to buyers. Sooner or later, they may not be able to price a home within the budgets of even those that are now the consumers. Higher sales prices mean fewer buyers. Issues arise about who really pays these costs - the present or future residents . Construction and development fees may be abused, and it appears from the following data in both Volumes 1 and 2 of this / report that some cities are stressing the housing market leading / to discriminatory actions - whether intended or unknowingly. In '.. this decade of fiscal stress, pressures on cities are great. ( mPact. development, permit, and other construction fees are BUILDERS ASSOCIATION-PROPRIETARY. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ES-5 1111r levied to assure that adequate capital facilities (infrastruc ture) are constructed to support new building development . Any !Ili homebuilder seeking a city for her or his products would easily decide on building in areas within cities that can provide the. most benefits for the housing product having the least governmental fees in order to open his products to the greatest numbers of buyers. One major question is raised about develop '. ment and impact fees . Do those cities having the highest fees have the greatest growth in population? Or do they have the greatest growth in number of single family detached housing IIII dwelling units? For many decades, developers had provided and paid for infrastructure within their projects ' areas. Past common and 1111 accepted practice for city fees was to merely cover inspection and administration costs with construction permit fees. Now, impact fees are being devised to pay for both internal and external infrastructure improvements. 1111 1111 1111 Illkof ill 1111 MI MI 1111 IN 1111 11041101 BUILDERS ASSOCIATION-PROPRIETARY. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ES-6 MI . r L _o - - - - m CO 0) i I co r CC 7 V m U 0 ca a) - Q) C L z U CD so rn _......... O r 0 le CD C ;1 ' 5 (ittr; CD a_ : : . a) 0 0 z' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U •U Q O ti v ui N 4 O tri c; r c; O cf. O t 4 O O sr) all Q.) 0 M N r r r N r 1- Cr N r LL CO CO U .0 U U U 0 U U U U U 0 = rs d m t U Q CO Cl) Cl) m O N Cl) (0 Q m >. • E o C y O E i as z c vZ co CD C) E °: a3 t .0 (j Y co Cl) d al N N coc W N CO ,�+ as as Fes- -c c c�i 'a c~i co n J J c co co y !j n < C 5 N m t o. • c c .- m m c c c L y w c ii �i E m 0 ca a) c. co m m •a 'a Q m c Z C- O O 0 U a• m c, ,, a) 2 2 "a m :Y C N d > L O >. = m E = ? m m ccv ccv m U ti ti ti ? LL .� n. c m c fl. •o c CO ti `m -al `a) Cl)` c v a> Rs S n a) m o m csii o m o P. n m •_ ) •a a m E 0> N v N co o> m cn U a CC 0 0 0 0 S 1- 0 S 0 0 cn F- 0 a 5 0 5 0 2 • O o D 0 \ i Cl (kW \ • 0 II__ • • ' BOB JONES ROAD r--- , TRACT 11 I TRACT 10 i 1 TRACT 9 'II , J LIGHT EQUIP. PARKING `i1 i ' ' _ r I I JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL :1 I = EMPLOYEE PARKING 1 BLDG 3 i' i 011111111111111110 I BLDG2 1 —+ 1 / , 9Illllllilillllll0 J11111111111III, VMAIIN-5 — = AREA — o --o �1IIIIIIIIIIIIIiII(1IIIIIIIIIIIIII(� i I ir 1r •1 , 1 �� FUELING I RACK ( I 1 , 1 L AREA I L. AREA r i TREET I I CT 16 >I 1 MitTERIALS I 'EQUIPMENT , •0PJ I' STORAGE UTILITIES STORAGE AREA !� STORAGE AREA ----- O I AREA ( I' ; 11 1 ;ACT 15 ' I I �I L �: 1 1 ``t I 30' \FFERY RD—.4 — ------ \ I ' I I I I I RACT 17 I I . \ I '1 • r i \ • I PARK DEPT. PARK DEFIT. PARK DEPT. ;I r^r --- �' EMPLOYEE MAINTENANCE TREE NURSERY I SEA' :. 1� PARKING AREA I L LI`,• I (RACT 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I (Itor. i - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - -i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I • I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 GOOSE NECK DRIVE 1 IT . I I I I I L r I I -.- . I I . kriterd abeam 1995 All-America City Applicant Evaluation SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS The 1995 All-America City Screening Committee congratulates the citizens, businesses and public agencies of Southlake, Texas for their collaborative efforts and substantial progress in community improvement. The projects described in Southlake' s 1995 All-America City application constitute affirmative steps to satisfy genuine community needs. Screening Committee members were impressed by the sound planning and execution of Southlake's various collaborative efforts. Based on Southlake 's application, it is clear that the community' s experiences can serve as a model and source of inspiration for other localities endeavoring to realize greater benefit from public assets and revenue flows, develop leadership and citizenship among youth, and encourage constructive communication between citizens and city government. Among the elements of Southlake's 1995 All-America City effort that most impressed members of the Screening Committee was the Joint Utilization Committee, which constitutes an effective effort on the part of the public sector to seek citizen satisfaction through innovation, creativity and collaboration. Screening Committee members commented favorably on JUC's extension of its joint-venture philosophy beyond facilities to embrace sharing and cooperation in the areas of personnel, policy and program delivery. The savings, efficiencies and quality enhancements achieved through JUC render this program truly worthy of national recognition. Similarly impressive was the Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighbors, which has succeeded in generating interest among Southlake residents in their governing institutions, while fostering a warm, cooperative relationship between citizens and the public sector. Particularly noteworthy is the fact that SPIN has apparently (kiwi inspired a number of Southlake residents to adopt a highly active model of citizenship by running for public office themselves. Active citizenship is too often limited to the e . model in which citizens antagonize and pressure government, rather than participating in it or working with it. More detail on the nature of specific issues and conflicts addressed through the SPIN citizen participation mechanism might have strengthened Southlake's overall presentation of this effort. While highly participatory in design, the Southlake Youth Advisory Commission was more difficult to evaluate. A fine boundary was discernible between SYAC and SPIN, raising some question of the extent to which SYAC constitutes another aspect or dimension of SPIN, rather than a separate effort. Additionally, Screening Committee members commented that the discussion of SYAC emphasized program design and process, as opposed to specific achievements. More detail on Southlake 's progress in addressing the volunteerism, substance abuse and teen curfew issues through the SYAC process might have reversed this impression. Overall, Southlake is building a strong base for becoming an All-America City in the future, particularly as evidence emerges that the community's many strong participatory processes and structures are generating tangible impacts. A future application might also place greater emphasis on the contributions of community-based organizations to the governance process in Southlake. The community's 1995 application portrayed a very strong public sector presence, to the apparent exclusion of other partners in community building. The National Civic League wishes Southlake continued success in its efforts at community betterment, and we hope you will regard us as a future source of support, guidance and assistance in confronting and solving civic issues. L (we 1 WHAT'S COMING NEXT? The City of Southlake will undertake many very important projects during the coming year. The first two Master Plan components to be updated will be the Master Thoroughfare Plan and the Southlake Parks, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan. Anticipated timelines follow. Thoroughfare Plan Park Master Plan 9/22/95 - Distribute Request for Proposals (RFP) for 9/25/95-The Park Board Committee working on the plan met transportation planning consultant to update the inventory of existing facilities, review and determine neigborhood zones, determine park standards, 195-Receive RFPs and begin selection process develop press releases, and discuss reaching SPIN, homeowners associations and special interest groups to help 11/1/95 - Award contract for MTP; consultant begins update existing inventory and project needs through to the year preliminary review and analysis of current thoroughfare plan, 2001. traffic conditions,zoning changes,etc. 10/9/95-Committee will meet to review developer agreements 1/96 - Work sessions/meetings with Planning &Zoning of existing facilities, review citizen survey data, and review Commission (P&Z), staff& consultants to discuss expected current status of inventory, and neighborhood zones. service levels, roadway types, roadway construction, etc., and draft preliminary update of MTP 10/23/95 - Committee will determine demand and needs for Southlake. 3/96 - Present draft report and recommendations at SPIN meetings to receive input 11/13/95 - Committee will identify resources (land available) for Southlake. 4/96-P&Z,consultants&staff finalize draft report and forward to City Council for action 12/11/95-Committee will outline 5-year plan of action. 5/96-City Council takes action on plan. 1/96-Committee will send draft report to P&Z for comments, hold focus group meetings with SPIN groups. For more information, call Tom Elgin, ext. 753 2/96-Committee will review comments received from public meetings and P&Z. 3/96 -Park Board, P&Z take action on plan. 4/96-City Council takes action on plan. For more information, contact Kim McAdams, x757 N City of Southlake 44 DutFit ak, September 29, 1995 Mayor: Gary Fickes Mr. William L. Wimberley, P.E. Mayor Pro Tern: Right-of-Way Agent Andrew L.Wambsganss Texas Dept. of Transportation Deputy Mayor ProTem: P.O. Box 6868 PamelaA.Muller Fort Worth,Texas 76115 Councilmembers: MichaelT.Richarme W.Ralph Evans Sally R.Hall Re: Developments Along S.H. 114 in the City of Southlake Ronald J.Maness City Manager. Dear Mr. Wimberley: Curtis E.Hawk Assistant City Manager. The purpose of this letter is to make you aware of some current developments in the Shana K.Yelverton City of Southlake which may impact the future ROW requirements for S.H. 114. City Secretary: The following developments have been submitted to the City for approval: Sandr 1_LeGrand Ref. Development Status 1. Wal-Mart This plat has been approved and filed in the County Plat Records as "Lot 2,Block 1,Farrar Addition." A • construction permit and certificate of occupancy has been issued for this lot. 2. Southlake Shopping This plat has been approved and filed in the County Village Plat Records as "Lots 1R-1, 1R-2 & 1R-3, Block 1, Kimball/1709 Addition. A construction permit has been issued for lot 1R-2(MacDonalds.) 3. Village Center This plat has been recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission.The developer has stated that he has a commitment for an anchor tenant on Lot 3,Block 1. I have attached reduced copies of these plats for your reference and a locator map showing each. My office will periodically forward these types of developments to L 667 North Carroll Avenue• Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-5097 - - AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" .. t L your attention. It is my hope that this will aid you in monitoring onng the type and intensity of development in the City of Southlake and particularly along the S.H. 114 corridor. NI" Sincerely, ' leidiq.) Greg Last Community Development Director enc: Reduced copies of plats for above referenced developments Locator map cc: Gary Fickes, Mayor Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager cAWPRL Rw1SQQT DOT1.WPD C ._ • • _ _ 1h1,) �- N100V il1RRIYJ ma IYNUF N r , i i 1! 1 srNo 4.1! _ -- __.. . g--III' 4 • ` C : I - -._L .� iI!IIIi1ii ,sue .11.--iir.tr—..._,,i1<::: �� + t I I s 1 III 1 ,•� � It ,.47 5� Y 11 +t .1. � f :e? fi�, 1 I '1'~ • I I " ' ul Z I _ 5i wfS 1 t !IP , 1M lit, 1 Q 4e iii; p ] `lL1 ' I �: I I IA 1 r-�---- - : G 1 1 3 i e• I t ;f i tl g ��' I i 1:1.1 ! .I :T R i tit I du. .�, !! N. :, k i 1 \ ll � 1 ij'+.!, j—Coe g . ; , ,; 1 1 • . 5 rii 1 1 j I�1 < 1 i•. i: :6_ ' I 44... ."---a-ser............ .... —— , .. It = ! z I ir-17 � 1 f IIa Ili .r or '�, 1 - I i 1 hi! Hi _ c .: Illt t IIl lira I q I I\\\ 1 1 I!;! Ii 'ill f 0 . • I -1 t t , 1 •,,t 1 1111111t tr,t;�� i�.11°� ;�, r #1:1 i it I•�it s; iiti i 1 iIi'IiI* t•t 1 �t I Ii 1• 1 l,li- F C 1i1 1.1 . t :in j + .ai 1.:;;i; I t1 t 111yIi+ 11 _ jl I';ij i•';l�'11! ;t;•] al t'!t IN,i. II 1a a 311 ?4; II IO et[./ II ':• ; 11,,l�� +t+t ' 's I I l . t1 1 't 1 0 '1,;<1.,I]t+ t.1 P1 t, • t.tI I•!jt . I, +f�+�a171 1... 1 a pip�i�l�lto111, 1t,1(h tt,t1 1!, !+ I (�!I i a�11•;I�jlllFib;j itcl i .ti1tl.I•11t F�p t; i I;,t� i Iluf �1,1t tI Ipll:�traTif. fie 11 t. il. I I � 1 � = • 1 �I ,. itltl.,I i ii . ] i,..I tI l. I jt•1 t+ . 1 11.,1 It111•;1]a ,.;! i; ,I 1� I.1• 41 I ti II;:.Ij1;I'• t`IIl�+ �,. I `36 t t t t. ., I [ t 1 I t t. , ]•(•i.t.,l I 41r i I,t I 1 I.ii 1;lit 11! ei 11 b I itti 1. , a tl' It u'1 Itl 1 (a•I ` it 1ili Ll ;till.mild Nig:11 IN li►..>I;l;it t II: it .i,l . ij I :II 111if:hi;1;. ._PI I • nat...._.1.0 Nau i }ss is a :p -(1T . is •L Z i •!z - is sam R7i ps_ • I . y1j �:s? i� .�4.II = u.•rsc.a j�{ tom rE _i ?: 1!s :J. 1 JI Jii:• C s ,t'I. .1 i .! -i..il !III 1 I ' I - Ell-i1Pi! ;.IiI + E .f 1• - 4 .IY;j i��!p ; I 3 i 1 ett4 i f:j=: t,_ !tg% 11.1'ss; ; "+.E id t ` ;, I' _ ;t' --A. it •j+l=ill:.�lip 1 1 ur?:iI1:L Ifiaf 'hi mil._xis; O zoz" :rat :L. vssi} za: mint =I+ ;; ls.. ss . � � '::::::. - !iIj's IIIE �! = e-zI * 1' _!,_ 1?!!� L!i � •aJEOQ <11 =�:!!!!!.1.!:!!!:, gEiE�!atrJs .i1, + izs {J1E;1 {�#JJ 1 1itEQOtW'... =L`JI 'A'1,a E e' 1111 iiliI 1-( s.-!ft' .1a1 'EE=I 1!-t s+•s N DY~ YY \V1 1 r 1 a ! D Ja. i a ai i e %s :•l1i' S! < Jl ' 1.;;iee—!Iaaa IJ; .ss; i J 3 1; r2 Ls' 1 f -igo2uof•nu r 2:■ J +r113 i111 'j JS 'Ci!'ii.sFrEl!1 i it a� I !I'll i l C- \:::i:Ii:F `< ' Jj�) +=ItiLI' CJ.� l1 ij I stI fn—a!! 21l _' a ` i'�1il !ij I7 �-1i�'a i JiJjS! '�_a4 v Esii'ip-, l j lrizi tg 1sli `S+:j , !s6 I is! i :I i si' i!a sl.- ♦1 a iljll rrala ! a a • s is-s- a Ji;•1•a s9at-•�i Ji Tj1( i1J aE;"1e15 ` a jL1�`1§ .sit: sr a* {E L � J�' ; . i'a: 1. a All j1 1I:sJ 1 lil ;' I I •th 4 isli ' I L+ ; J� 1 JI; !j 3 i }�� •+lass L-S..ii = -I- i'21-1E1 FiF s ra•E3i ljisEi1�a(i liPi I it; Iva 3[ r• ,AIi. 2, I .Q 1'1rE1- �t f( it O. 1 . 6 a 111 i14 j _ C . ti a • j 'i ii E w - I Z ._ � i' . �i1+�( E i i + � `,�fj4 i, i l if II `i 1 1 (Qp 13NNO93(118) • 61 £ON 1POad 04011 Aijf109 ': — co 4 i i' ` f1 --f 1 i ' it ; 'ems -:;,. !�; ff�`/j fir i�f' f. dig :o•:±�„ .- 4. - ,I ` • r t ... . ii! 4. a. i0 ., 14 h° or.I ~tea•' •` • �O V• 1 J j I C _ cr •,0 I + .a-..a—ti..a•,” wwwr•wa.fr :. xu,r_'r i'O r it S 1 'i•� .47:.;s•: 4 r iI r I `5 L'' : 1 �.a�' \ .�.. it 1. • ' R •gI I.'. C .+rurto is- ff.r•!N' —N-r., ^'i = • 1... 5 •: K i ;IQ C— .4 Iaaa rt.n--'1nalra l:=- *w--- _ !` .a:I t.,�;..f 1: .I 'i I. F,` 1- --s' r' N �-- ;�aa.•�M,.a• . a J Ir J -r w „if aM' is .i/. i • `II • L 1 ' '• �yE � I `a I [ „..ssa/A• ..NYY r•- NORTIF LW/It xrxrw srwoxsi 1 ,AFAR BLOCK • 3 _���_1 0 1 .d t:.� - ! it ti _.•2.i i Mf'Z 11. mil ,Ill 11111 i jimirn . .;j=iI!ij=1Nig rf l 11 Jb F ;ram \. s i1ii1i!!iiJii1i 1Uh!II •'(..., , _ 'Ii age Ill a chi v liw ,A8Ei x ":.1":. 1• 1 ..■.�■ :ilfll j 11 IIH'Il 'j,Ni #ii' l;�l���_� :1� x oP° Uo�I- - i; .11:13. g., ll IIIN 11IIII ill, /!c.a3i_?24./.1 Ig Ergf. t. .-e, Es ti_ hillii.„i.ie3......„..r,_.____=.b.__.,.i:__ f� : �i, fn♦ fRl 0 11! :ie.v.,.....7 alar.7 . . 1 \ II ftaa E• It X oa 1.4 4 = 1 eXX ps < 111111 1111111 «Y• 4a • 3 ,•.,t: 111 I ! f !ta t I I S s bt12 a$f;.." r-¢ •X'- '111 s ill 1 ___-J ' ; ♦♦♦♦,Lire- gVII il 1 le 1 IN Iv I s R POI l' tiffi o __J �'. gal NI 1 \ �!♦ } I 1 ! if •• ; }� `. yo s.r.w M /r` /e.ad 3 `-j :�L.. r- _ _ . , -'' 9-Aos 1 I Ifs z5. Xr<is5 / 1a5 i /II____(11., -v.,4..c.o.i \:\ ii;7 /IL ./lj1 / i :ji -.. f, :./�`� Celt` ai 1 4.)E......i...... I i I ; I 7 I. : �'� � ,: a /� r" i� - i5/ A N;;� s t' I-- , I., dr,A -,.izt, ,. . 4,,„i,- (1,,‘„,_ „.,,,,A1- g.t:j I; , b.„.........; r� ' it r: i ;,/ 1 ;; ,�} ir/,,,/,,,1 ° �"�- - ; •is / / -L..• ;r.. . / / 1 ,14.1 ,►, 0 / •,v.� �,,• .., -gb ise i ..5 1 i I 4_ "..•.iti4:,4. - . . / -AP il:',//P/7 ‘ Vs-01-d Na31 - --\-...... i...-1-_______• ' I / 1:1 •...=.;:,...;.. . . , r, r A L. ../..�{r:: _ __ v _� it \ 4.11.Itinril 1 - • •- r- -- - 1 .,.,, ' �♦ mac.- �/ . , / / �:;- ',\/,,( 1 i! :i•-• "- -t I 1 L ; w. gd W - �I z ,. ��. Z 0 i „A u, N i 1 N<f` - f't- --... am' • wt, W. �. :� �-� a _w o •�; , Wi ' z -.. . ‘ - i a (!i • c,•• q -,- .. L74tc.. .11___i_ — G _� .E_ _ x _ f '—IV � 10 a 3 A 5 III �. 1. : seQ �' ssta S�. ' t© :E • i ..... fF� _ it, s ®t1�. 1EEy���y- + + Y,.f`„ a ;;O; ]!'L . . f Tom=& ��DW� �fl�]�� Il �� ELI © �t ; 14,1 A S kl 2 3 - Is, Up _ r I i ►e ral oi.„ • _ �1,,........ = �Y of , a '0 - �ei ©® I , F ' a \ n ! =T Y� x s i CIP r .ro Q - ; -;�,r�fll}-- -- z� 11 e r a x ` 70. n. ,y •Y'f �• _ ® i'. gyp •, �• C d•t . . • . a A x - 1 $ 'a `� g x a s ea A p -- _ �,' �a x IA a g1 , '4 l: . cher Ica a a a x " r. O a Is I ../i .D t ..I --I -2 pz x a c x x 4C C \ \ 4 J •',,‘..,: i VI % : '4.: 't ' . iM 4- )I -8 I 1 . a H \ ___ c 9 .t- g aI 4 - . ' r'';,1-1---- ' M. ' ' . l':121 ''"' - 411Cm 7 .•L • -)'1-? E\l a nt• a . � ! x d�1 ♦ Y Y 31 T d „I. '-Irl-_ 1 1 ' x x }$��i O• v� Ix x a s1 - SZ 'Y Z� __d __ M _ $ A x b x AZ �`• IA ' A IA co d \ _ !______:4_6T____ : '- = 1\ .a .'. ,e. it, . (4'.(C-fi-Bt'-. : v , • Q 1''•';U1_,, 0. W. 4 r-- •" Ys l7 -- ... " : : •. v. I zi .. ..i . . • • .4 g .. ,,, .z. A L A x 0 : m i e Ea Y O w ii p I I 'U • • 'Q O ►.-w ., 1 A k WI CI o _ •y>, Imo ,,, 1 i t Q 20 . 'y� Y ck, A �r a—' SS T 1 —Z 4— �L City of Southlake,Texas . • MEMORANDUM September 26, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution 95-27, Release of Easement Between Lot 39 And Lot 40, Block 3 Southridge Lakes Phase III, Section One Richard Morgan of Lot 39 (402 Donley Court) and R. Sean Brennan of Lot 40 (403 Donley Court) have requested that the 15-foot easement between their properties be releasstl by-"the City of Southlake. Attached are letters requesting the easement release. Standard operating procedure requires property owners to request in writing the release of an easement, pay a $150 fee to have the City release an easement and also obtain the services of a public surveyor to draw the easement description. Mr. Morgan and Mr. Brennan have complied with these procedures. Previously, the plan was to use this easement to extend sewer up to North Peytonville, however, it appears that the sewer connection will come from another area and this easement is not needed. All of the utility companies have granted the easement release. In order to abandon this easement the City will issue Resolution 95-27 along with a Quit Claim Deed. Please place Resolution 95-27 on the October 3, 1995 agenda for Council consideration. BW/sm Attachments: Resolution 95-27 Quit Claim Deed Letter from residents L 5Al (61.• RESOLUTION NO. 95-27 A RESOLUTION VACATING AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF A 15-FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT,IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP,INTEREST OR CONTROL OF SAID 15-FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Whereas,the City of Southlake is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant of Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Lie Government Code; and Whereas, a 15-foot utility easement has previously been dedicated to the City of Southlake by the previous owner of the affected property in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas Whereas,the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that said 15-foot utility easement located on property between Lot 39 and Lot 40, Block 3, Southridge Lakes Phase III , Section One, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas in accordance with the deed recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 782, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas is not being used by,nor useful or convenient to the public in general;therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefitted by its vacation and abandonment. Said 15-foot (6,,, utility easement is more specifically described on the attached exhibit: 54 - & (we Exhibit A: Legal and Graphic Description Whereas, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said 15-foot utility easement easement,the City desires to execute a Quit Claim Deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said easement to the owners of the property of Lot 39 and Lot 40, Block 3, Southridge Lakes Phase III, Section One, recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 782, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and their heirs, and assigns. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 (hre The 15-foot utility easement, as described herein, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefitted by its vacation and abandonment. Accordingly,the above described 15-foot utility easement located on property owned between Lot 39 and Lot 40, Block 3, Southridge Lakes, Phase III, Section One, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas in accordance with the deed recorded in Cabinet A, Slide One, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas is hereby vacated and abandoned as public property and such area so abandoned shall revert in fee simple to the owner of the remainder of said property. SECTION 2 The Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the 15-foot utility (iire easement on behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. A copy of said quitclaim deed shall be �5 /3 (we presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas by the office of the City Secretary. SECTION 3 This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS day of 1995. Mayor Attest: (hir City Secretary L ,5,g-q (Ipe QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS : KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT : That the City Council of the City of Southlake, County of Tarrant, State of Texas, after careful study and consideration,has determined that a portion of a certain 15 -foot utility easement located between Lot 39 and Lot 40 Block 3, Southridge Lakes Phase III, Section One, City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas,hereinafter specifically described,is not being used by,nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding public benefit,and the public would be better served and benefited by its vatidn and abandonment. For and in consideration of the above findings and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,the City of Southlake does hereby bargain, sell,release,vacate, abandon and forever quitclaim unto: owners of Lot 39 and Lot 40. Block 3. Southridge Lakes Phase III and any and all of their heirs, legal representatives of (hime assigns,all of its right, title, and interest in and to the following described real property situated in Tarrant County, Texas,to wit: See Exhibit A: Legal and Graphic Description TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of its right, title and interest in and to the above described 15-foot utility easement unto the said Grantee,his heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs, legal representatives of assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid 15-foot utility easement, premises or appurtenances or any part thereof Executed this the day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes, Mayor 1 i . 1 Exhibit A I EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 15 foot wide utility easement across Lot 39 and Lot 40,Block 3,SOUTHRIDGE LAKES,PHASE III,SECTION ONE,an Addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas,according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A,Slide (Pr' 782,Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas and said easement described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said Lot 40 and being the northeast corner of said Lot 39; THENCE North 89 degrees 01 minutes 07 seconds East,10.0 feet to a corner, THENCE parallel the west line of said Lot 40,South 00 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds West,200.83 feet to a point 10 feet from the right-of-way line of Donley Court,with a radius of 60.0 feet the center being South 10 degrees 03 minutes 59 sconds West; THENCE westerly along said curve and concentric width street right-of-way line,15.05 feet; THENCE North 00 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds East,199.82 feet to a point in the north line of said Lot 39; THENCE North 89 degrees 01 minutes 07 seconds East,5.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. POINT OF W. SULUVAN, JR. ET UX /BEGINNING VOL. 6824, PG. 312 9°01'07' E_ _ 10.00' _ 5.00' 041 , ......... .. LOT 39 LOT 40 w � co o03N oN BLOCK 3 Le 0 ,- N O CO 15' EASEMENT TO BE ABANDONED / 1. _ _ / / Urit.4 • 4f?: / 15.05' / R=60.0' DONLEY , \ COURT ) 1 REVISED: 09-25-1995 REVISED: 08-22-1995 DATE: 06-27-1995 The lrderssrhed does hmeby certify that the survey was the der made an the arard d the property body desabed hereon and s eoms:t.and that there are no do:reparte es.oorsrus.encroachments,oycrfeppiq of improvements. SURVEY NO.: 9501779 waft easements or rights of way.escept ws shown hereon.ard that saidproperty hes access to ard gram seal doted SCALE: 1 inch=40 feet foadway.Sad property being> t to any and of easements.reservabons and reaviacrm that may be at record. • Are reference -100 year food pled or Rood hard zones are an estimate based an data shown en the Flood Marano'•� •:•,.•t• • HUD and should not be interpreted as a study ordetrovnation at the Roodaq Co' LEGEND h.�,. :e�,�.F'•-� v j .� L�/� t e STEEL 1100 SET At '-t' STEEL• p Roo"' ty�rr�r� �y(� THOMAS W. VOGT, P.E. PROPERTY LINE •&L ..;:f •'� "„;; f kP`n - • -WOOD FENCE 'r. �1i1L•..'i:117" K-CHAIN uNK FENCE 1M . '`) 1 -,, r REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR MI 1928 •P.P. POWER POLE �� P h Alt' fpQr REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL Q4GRtEERNO 4Sfi?2 E OVERNEAO;ELECTRICAL LINES ...�,4, y, 4�• 1. .�:er h f h.cy P.O.BOX 21f�4•BEDFORD.TEXAS 760954274 CONCRETE' j ORAL‘ -�'' :'�'j�. •V aV PHONE:(Ltd 284-IE2I•FAX:(117)$09.17711 COPYRIGHT 1994 BY THOMAS W.VOGT NI ""(/fJL FROM HRf<ROli CFiELE PHONE NO. : 2149230839 AUG-24-1995 11;0,4 FROM CITY OF SOUTHLRKE TO 12142426814 P.03 Cre- .Appendix Public Easement Abandonment by Plat Recorded public easements may be abandoned on dual plats,plat revisions, plat showings, or amended plats which are approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council by the following pr'otedure. First, the statement end signature block indicated below should be added to the face of the plat. Upon final approval of the plat, the applicant shall obtain signatures of approval from Else representative of each respective utility company. Signatures must be original for every document to be recorded-mylar originals if Tarrant County or mylar originals and bineline copies if Denton County.Addresses and phone numbers of utility companies representatives are provided on the second pry of this appendix. The City will then obtain appropriate signatures from City and elected ol"icia1S. We,the mderalgned,as dab,authorized rives of the respective utility companies, lta+elxy express no objection to the*endows=of do easement so fluted on cos plat,said-` easement being previously recorded i PUc Cabot A,Slide 782,hdy 22, 1991.'gram County. Texas. Marron Zeman Cable (kw Printed Name: 1M liar,Iy Title .__.—._-- T4al,n iaa 1 Dp e ra f'e.s )1 e. Date: "—I a-9S • AUG 24 ' 95 19: 17 817 488 5074 PAGE .083 542.- 7 Le Appendix Public Easement Abandonment by Plat Recorded public easements may be abandoned on final plats, plat revisions, plat showings, or amended plats which are approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council by the following procedure. First, the statement and signature block indicated below should be added to the face of the plat. Upon final approval of the plat, the applicant shall obtain signatures of approval from the representative of each respective utility company. Signatures - must be original for every document to be recorded - mylar originals if Tarrant County or mylar originals and blueline copies if Denton County. Addresses and phone numbers of utility companies representatives are provided on the second page of this appendix. The City will then obtain appropriate signatures from City and elected officials. We, the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment of the easement so noted on this plat, saki ' easement being previously recorded in File Cabinet A, Slide 782,July 22, 1991, Tarrant County, Texas. Lone Star Gas Signed: Printed Name: —i \Pt(.J(t. T 'M i Cal Tit1e:�C�OJQ,L� C %(`lpr Date: 02��e�z-(ICI L 54 g Appendix Public Easement Abandonment by Plat Recorded public easements may be abandoned on final plats, plat revisions, plat showings, or amended plats which are approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council by the following procedure. First, the statement and signature block indicated below should be added to the face of the plat. Upon final approval of the plat, the applicant shall obtain signatures of approval from the representative of each respective utility company. Signatures must be original for every document to be recorded - mylar originals if Tarrant County or mylar originals and blueline copies if Denton County. Addresses and phone numbers of utility companies representatives are provided on the second page of this appendix. The City will then obtain appropriate signatures from City and elected officials. We, the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment of the easement so noted on this plat, said easement being previously recorded in File Cabinet A, Slide 782,July 22, 1991, Tarrant Catty,_.w Texas. Sammons Cable / / Signed: /l-I,� � Printed Name: DIN \V. ri(Z5:=i`A\ Title: LJT i L L V\j Coo RO\ ,4T°R. Date: 7 l l ZJsi5 p 5" /9r 1 (He Appendix Public Easement Abandonment by Plat Recorded public easements may be abandoned on fmal plats, plat revisions, plat showings, or amended plats which are approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council by the following procedure. First, the statement and signature block indicated below should be added to the face of the plat. Upon fmal approval of the plat, the applicant shall obtain signatures of approval from the representative of each respective utility company. Signatures must be original for every document to be recorded - mylar originals if Tarrant County or mylar originals and blueline copies if Denton County. Addresses and phone numbers of utility companies representatives are provided on the second page of this appendix. The City will then obtain appropriate signatures from City and elected officials. We, the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment of the easement so noted on this plat, said" easement being previously recorded in File Cabinet A, Slide 782,July 22, 1991, Tarrant County, Texas. TU Electric. (moo" Signed: Printed Name: /X I c.ku rot L. a. l d elo rm j C Title: - tits J Date: - 24-(15 TU Electric will allow the above request to abandon the easement in question provided it has no effect on our 10 foot utility easement along the front property line of lots in question. L g-io • Appendix Public Easement Abandonment by Plat Recorded public easements may be abandoned on final plats, plat revisions, plat showings, or amended plats which are approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council by the following procedure. First, the statement and signature-block indicated below should be added to the face of the plat. Upon fmal approval of the plat, the applicant shall obtain signatures of approval from the representative of each respective utility company. Signatures must be original for every document to be recorded - mylar originals if Tarrant County or mylar originals and blueline copies if Denton County. Addresses and phone numbers of utility companies representatives are provided on the second page of this appendix. The City will then obtain appropriate signatures from City and elected officials. We, the undersigned, as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment of the easement so noted on this plat, sail? easement being previously recorded in File Cabinet A, Slide 782,July 22, 1991, Tarrant County, Texas. elL • Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. < ` )4 Signed: ‘1\1\ Printed Name: /2/AgVin} qi / (, Title: .Ii2i -7 , 5 )9i' • Date: 7 /3- / I L Cre QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS : KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT : That the City Council of the City of Southlake, County of Tarrant, State of Texas, after careful study and consideration,has determined that a portion of a certain 15 -foot utility easement located between Lot 39 and Lot 40 Block 3, Southridge Lakes Phase III, Section One, an addition to City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Texas ,hereinafter specifically described, is not being used by,nor useful or convenient to the public in general;therefore,it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding public benefit,and the public would be better served and benefitedby its-racation and abandonment. For and in consideration of the above findings and for other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,the City of Southlake does hereby bargain,sell,release,vacate,abandon and forever quitclaim unto: owners of Lot 39 and Lot 40.Bock 3. Southridge Lakes Phase III. an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County, (6,,, Texas and any and all of their heirs,legal representatives of assigns,all of its right,title,and interest in and to the following described real property situated in Tarrant County,Texas,to wit: See Exhibit A: Legal and Graphic Description TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of its right, title and interest in and to the above described 15-foot utility easement unto the said Grantee,his heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs, legal representatives of assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid 15-foot utility easement,premises or appurtenances or any part thereof. Executed this the day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: • Gary Fickes, Mayor 1 • L BEFORE ME,the undersigned authority,on this day personally appeared GARY FICKES,Mayor of the City of Southlake, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 1995. Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Grantee Address: Return to: City Secretary City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 forms\quitclaim.frm 2 g/9"13 ' " .� _--'-'--- _----- - , / 0'/~ /--- ---- - - -----' -- '--- -' _ _ -_--__--- _-__- - `~_ _ , -_'- _ z _ ( iei5 Ile ) his ive4 D,6471766 ,dy � govd6 setter aeceSS �ie 4/ � �rllC ,�iL. %fio� . ��f- is �fso our' �i ei= s pry --Mai--Mai �-Me, t�se 'li�� has the4' Iver sizileoL on 1/11 ,7_5 filethee eise- J�lf' Gu4L 4-g a `esa C7; S2euer ee1�rethe,l 46 ,die QTievi��lle, ,e5eca.‘66 ai2 Pxas .4gCoer co1wethaw _ �s l� / /LC y/xers - f -fie y tioy /7o_ lo iiee% -Me n/ Coart ��tse �e`rzG `�rc��r� j toe, Yespe ��/y reV.est --*t' eensder atfidon/ly .14-Mic‘ .20 die h '/ ge66 ,&0* o-P ffee /1siq'e, die DKi/g..s c� rfs Gf/L 2/der,Z, m �o _C&oL -�v i"l�/s6 OCCr lkjs /oU� -foGvj'l_� G+rifGi �-fs retra,C a„741-eo.5" .eri&, /ash nt-itccra / a.reas Grins es�oec(� �Ot" �i� l,o hem w� ao.se_ oc�� hee7 - a_ Yecen (eeht 1� S A � ho/L g� has + ei fa// on �s k(-d-74ed. -fhe nar % erd, a oar /9/a/e/ (4)h;e4 iwdeps iv, keplohn%lam oaic . he�-� door he�G� s � ���rQ� ���!y '^ ^ � ^ - �u�� ---- - --- ------'--�---'--------------------_-_-_-__�_-_-'_-�_-'- -_- - - _- ._-______._ ee Ale, Ole'& Al2d - --_-_ f rd 9 Z�-g 46 �, -Zdlll - )��r __-___-~-. ' '_. ' - � -- � ' • q fig' - :.- - .,, Iv, • • 2/0 2- -Donley (-t (let) `t03 doh/ey 67`. (rj tif> , lonley ( 1 Easement ru-11s do6an grolx rty //, h wed houses t . mo t^ r : •t •r yy A . ` i , • • • �.• _ I. V • Y r • I . ,, . V • View o -f-res avid tialurai underbrush a--(fe ed- i y .or ley (-7'. -Q t y • ♦ • • L <i,i S iS • • • N • • i<.� .T �•l 1� • 1. • •!•• •'•i"6 yy • ' • Sfri sue' 'ilk i.e . T �� ^.apA� t> • rtt . • • . < w. f•. �IW • r_ 2. • ,♦. w tit t v y'1.: •{..:• fit.-- 7+ .•'"} i • ya-ra's of 402_ bor)ley Gt (Fore raend) ari. �03 Doriley c (bac,hyi-ac.2d). _r oak �recs on r a-r� ©n Gon/e rt 6asef 1 as as sinzr/ �r a-nd_ ider brush idr�c4 e!. • • is • • • r .' t • • �j�'/,f I- g6:tp R. SEAN BRENNAN 403 DONLEY COURT SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 April 21, 1995 Mr. Curtis Hawk City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092-8898 Dear Mr. Hawk: As you know, the City currently has a 15 foot utility easement which runs North/South along the western boundary of our property,403 Donley Court(the"Donley Court Easement"). It is my understanding that the purpose of this easement was for future sewer line access to North Peytonville Road. To the best of my knowledge,there are no other current or planned future utility uses for this easement. Located directlyon this easement are several large mature and flourishingnative oak trees,one of which is in excess of 6 feet in circumference. Because of these trees,the sewer stub line was not installed on the easement at the time our property(located in the back of Arvida) was developed. Any future sewer use of this easement will therefore require the destruction of these trees. As a result of City Council action taken in 1994, it is my understanding that an alternative ("Meyers Meadows") utility/sewer easement has been obtained by the City which provides sewer access to the same N. Peytonville Road location. I also understand that the sewer line has already been installed on the Meyers Meadows easement and, as a result,a sewer connection to the subject N. Peytonville Road area is currently in place. As an existing sewer connection is in place, it appears that the City may no longer require the Donley Court easement. Therefore, we respectfully request that the City consider abandoning this easement. Like most of the residents of Southlake, we chose this area to raise our family in part due to its small town outdoor rural atmosphere. The continuing demand and development growth in Southlake has placed ever increasing pressures in preserving this area's "country" appeal. As an example, the recent N. Peytonville Road widening has already taken a toll on the trees located near our property. We have taken great pains to 5R-i9 preserve the remaining indigenous trees including relocating planned driveways, refraining from fencing, and for a large part, not even clearing the natural underbrush on the easement. These actions have all been taken with a commitment to protecting the natural beauty of this area. By eliminating fencing, this "nature" area is currently enjoyed by all the surrounding neighbors as well as anyone driving along this section of N. Peytonville Road. I sincerely hope that you, your staff and the City Council will give sericus consideration to our request. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, R. Sean Brennan (:;.:)as:/vC/- Robin R. Brennan 5/-a0 •0' - City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 27, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Setting the Public Hearing Date to Discuss Land Use Assumptions for Southlake's Impact Fee Study You will recall that the City Council recently appointed a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) and has hired planning/engineering/financial consultants to complete a study to update water and wastewater impact fees and to adopt roadway impact fees. Over the last several months, the committee and consultant/staff study team have looked at land use assumptions and growth projections, capital improvement needs and costs, and have begun to examine potential fees. As they move closer to completing their work on this project, we need to move forward with scheduling appropriate public hearings. Attached you will find a resolution setting the date for the first public hearing in this process. The purpose of this public hearing is to discuss the land use assumptions used in the study to update water/wastewater impact fees and to adopt roadway impact fees. You will note that we are hoping to hold the hearing on the land use assumptions on November 7, 1995. I have included a copy of the Land Use Assumption Report, as approved by the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee, for Council's information. A reference to this report will be included in the public hearing notice and council members may have citizens or developers calling with questions or comments. For more information regarding the report, I would recommend calling Tom Elgin, Planner. Please place this resolution on the City Council's agenda for the October 3 meeting. . S L RESOLUTION NO. 95-39 A RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 7, 1995, TO DISCUSS AND REVIEW PROPOSED UPDATE OF THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; TO DISCUSS AND REVIEW PROPOSED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR THE MAILING AND/OR PUBLISHING OF NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY STATE STATUTE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake must expand its water, sewer and roadway systems in order to maintain current standards of public health and safety if new development is to be accommodated without decreasing current standards of public health and safety; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to legislative authority under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, the City Council, heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 510 and 510A, adopting water and sewer impact fees within the City of Southlake; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code required the periodic update of land use assumptions, capital improvements plan and impact fees at least every three (3) years; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with requirements delineated in Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, the City is proposing to adopt roadway impact fees after holding a public hearing thereon; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. A public hearing to discuss the proposed land use assumptions applicable to water, sewer, and roadway systems within the City of Southlake is hereby scheduled to be held in the City Council chambers of the City of Southlake at 7:30 p.m. on November 7, 1995. SECTION 2. The City Secretary is hereby directed to mail and/or publish notice of said hearing 3a-c L Resolution No. 95-30 Page two as required in Section 395.055 of the Texas Local Government Code. On or before the date of the first publication of the notice of the hearing on the proposed the land use assumptions, the land use assumption report shall be made available to the public. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon passage by the City Council. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Mayor Gary Fickes ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary c:\wpfil es\res95-39.RES\sl L 5J-3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS FOR IMPACT FEES September 11, 1995 Prepared by: J. T. Dunkin & Associates, Inc. Urban Planners - Landscape Architects Dallas, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS FOR IMPACT FEES PURPOSE Chapter 395 (formerly S.B. 336) of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate development impact fees. The initial process is the establishment of land use assumptions. These land use assumptions,which include population and employment, will become the basis for the preparation of impact fee capital improvement plans for water, wastewater, and roadway facilities. To assist the City of Southlake in determining the need and timing of capital improvements to serve future development,a reasonable estimation of future growth is required. The purpose of this report is to formulate growth and development projections based on assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity, and timing of various future land uses in the community, and to establish and document the methodology used for preparing the growth and land use assumptions. ELEMENTS OF THIS LAND USE ASSUMPTION REPORT This report contains: I. Methodology - Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the land use assumptions II. Service Area Maps (Plates 1, 2, and 3) -The impact fee service areas for water, wastewater, and roadway facilities based on data collection zones and/or traffic survey zones III. Base Data - Information on population, employment, and land use for Southlake as of January, 1995 for each data collection zone IV. Ten-Year Growth Assumptions - Population and employment growth assumptions for 10 years by data collection zones or traffic survey zones (TSZ) and impact fee service areas V. Ultimate Projections -Projections which reflect a completely developed condition based on the City's Future Land Use Plan or ultimate "built out" scenario VI. Summary - Brief synopsis of the land use assumptions report 1 I. METHODOLOGY Based on the growth assumptions and the capital improvements needed to support growth, it is possible to develop an impact fee structure which fairly allocates improvement costs to growth areas in relationship to their impact on the entire infrastructure system. The database and projections in this report have been formulated using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. These Land Use Assumptions and future growth projections take into consideration several factors 1111 influencing development patterns, including: 1. The character, type, density, and quantity of existing development 2. Existing zoning patterns 3. Future Land Use Plan 4. Availability of land for future expansion and the physical holding capacity of the City 5. Current growth trends in the City 6. Location and configuration of vacant land 7. Employment and population absorption rates 8. Known or anticipated development projects 4 9. Sewer availability 10. Comparison to historical growth rates of area cities Following is the general methodology used for the preparation of this report: 1. Establish impact fee service areas for water, wastewater and roadway facilities based on data collection zones and/or traffic survey zones (Section II - Service Area Maps) 2. Collect/determine benchmark data on population, employment and land use as of January 1, 1995 (Section III - Base Year Data) 3. Project population and employment growth for ten years by impact fee service areas and data collection zones (Section IV - Ten-Year Growth Assumptions) 4. Project the ultimate population and land use (by land use category) for a fully developed city (Section V - Ultimate Projection) Detailed methodology for each of the above is contained in the respective sections. 2 II. SERVICE AREA MAPS Plates 1, 2 and 3 show the proposed service areas for roadway, water, and wastewater facilities respectively. The boundary for water and wastewater facilities is the existing City Limits which was the same service area as in the initial 1990 water and sewer impact fee study and its subsequent update in 1993. Plate 1, entitled "Service Areas for Roadway Impact Fees,"depicts the 8 proposed service areas for roadway facilities. The proposed roadway service area boundaries encompass anywhere from 1 to 8 traffic survey zones. A Traffic Survey Zone (TSZ) is a type of data collection zone, established by NCTCOG for all areas within the NCTCOG region, including within the corporate City Limits of Southlake. The Traffic Survey Zones in Southlake vary in size from about 12 to 1400 acres. These zones are based on the areas used for transportation computer modelling for Southlake and termed traffic survey zones. The traffic survey zones were formulated on the basis of homogeneity and traffic generation potential using major arterials, railroad lines and other physical boundaries for delineation. Since the data needed for calculation of roadway impact fees is required to be compiled by TSZs', the land use assumptions are compiled by the same traffic survey zones or combinations thereof. The Traffic Survey Zone Map is a standardized map available at the NCTCOG and City of Southlake municipal offices. These traffic survey zones will be aggregated into different areas to form service areas for roadway impact fees. The roadway service areas were formulated based on three primary parameters; one, the boundaries of each service area are consistent with the boundaries of the TSZs, two, each zone is less than three miles in diameter (a size requirement specified in Subchapter A, Section 395.001 of the Impact Fee Statute), and three, a conceptual roadway capital improvement plan was used for a comparison of proposed projects as they related to the service zone boundaries. Although the capital improvement plan and impact fees will be prepared as a separate document for roadway facilities, the geographic boundaries of the roadway service areas will be the same as shown on Plate 1. 'The original traffic survey boundary structure for Southlake was created in 1986 by NCTCOG. The structure was updated after the 1990 census results were published. The TSZ boundaries are consistent with census tract boundaries. 3 0 mmill _ 411A . , y.:., , S»uthlak - . , , ----, ,,,,_, 1 1T ! ,...,._ [ l hmo? � i • ° ° ,"d eJ ///drill....... .: _. ... m , . . , _.___---. , - ‘,1 . ir, / „, ,.... if. .. -, .. I I �.:__ ; I , 1S gin. ! .�x. � , .- • l � • • .,.,fee, �,�' [ t • 1 : -- _ • tt ti .W . =: '_JII -" I =='E n . / om 1.1.111 tit :aka I.4. . _ unnni ,u- 111 nal , 11 il Durair::....&64.""lillaimillill Vim ,.. ■ 1•z ,: Organ!ripp,ort...-*,..... ..y, am::: -.--1..---ra- ....im iiimMI ila....,- , ...,.-.::- _.._-...I Ni-_ r6.ina •40 t,,1/.17,iS.',:.' 1 a_M_., ..�lr� r - .j. c spry i •Ipy� Ah i :ao- P.T..a1 P i n two V m L. • - - ." .l� 1- Mte g 1 iA Oi • Evian 1 =a..R p11' gbh ull•«. mL �.� 'a 1;■ ,5�.� • �r'ii'a_�� Ga=. t��■ I • y� '.i_All11y .11' glire 411,:IIa.i�S•.•Z.0:11�H plKm fM wF li Yi 4411V iV (mC;•;1�io Q! 1 I1 -'at I�„'l111I■ �y'2 •;:.:6dS li,'1,...�„a.. Zi���s 3 ,11 ���;_—�— �;' r�� �_•^• 1 3s....,... - rF 4riIuiTfl! __ !lu1q� Fr'��uw '�.rs%._An niuf': w�U�tiliit ar -:� ' l ,I•1« rein �II fNa_ aa �Ittrl' ila"•"'ci= q I y iL1IIiiI IE= fl/16— 11-2-: ratil'i% '111:ATelS;- WY 41111 I( .i- I' II 11 01111MINWSINggiffll . , : mi ,...i �'jj-„�' .� yi, _ _ �� �_.�`tI1�..111N � �f Li m=miribuilE If► 4.,„...,,...... .a. .% trai ' lu■11 =.� `�• f�y4-411:1 ., flu LL' r f _,... r _„....,,,..___ �3``'.1 ii it .� iii, � F .w 1 I. il�llU i J �c .ram,Mplili p N ir as%� In: _ -.so- ,`s.k '�� I - ®tvla-ffstriplik7_lip& --7. •ii.p..‘.---..int. iii i m � A'�■ '�I ��. _ t 1 kigi • �I, d � 41/ �tG; - /.: III 1_ /i el T ,a, I ., - N .• I Alta 6 S SERVICE AREAS FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES :'"Y OF SOUTHLAKE PLATE 1 56-8 ♦ \ SM u t t l l a e .■-a 4.-'<• _ I w 1 , ,-1 in , , '�la—� sus • ".. _ i _ r,- made .. _ ;. _._ •._mama M �� _ �, I _ Is, 3 , - 1 > f - EI L 1 / .. .sly !lr Ili - '�Iir.a��a ` !7i , a I � iiimilMIM ift,ii...= ..i-T... : el IpTor4..q._ .m4 ptact.:....':..rior-le-7-' a=S Wa; ■■ a41111.1. 1 1ti1 milt ,.,, B- ell iisatssasimilmTh.' Mil i NM rwim7e...l... 1.0426.1 iptg -:ita I MN MP iribl;Iiii "011.04 ill � I II.�,.,rtill ' �;�r.� a ., r1L{�,. RBI. b;114 .: �; - .: CI'.!!l it=aabet=®ra - - 1b+"r ► 710,61 ..I .•.S mama r E2 '/++IWO 11111 i• * r I x sea swim r.i ��' 1 II �- �O ia'� �.ym1-aria'- _BI ii: iuvis' eV�.,�_'�:�rj . W "HiEU; isl lip�•1„11.= •Y 1i "r=..�Ago..... „s_r,[ �wwr iIllIlIl\K,NiR� �eiL' � �: :1� =� MOM . PRiiii iti I iS:ii: IIi1.11 fsk l ital. •� _; _I ny'�isali= ti � � -_�=L 1 t'I IIIAIIlM' _ €�'t„ T I all I • Sy �• = nr•� e�'ct� eq ;,�;�...�191111111 �r4�wu.�x.nir1,; ��''7am a �+► .. .■om C 5= IN IIIi11171 b Sr r �z-y��,w��,, i- :gip i•:ivamm' •� to '� -11 or0 1 t i igia.....-111.1 -mom=..,Prill, p:: W, i Ai lle Om i Wilma ' !Ii J_ = ■■=�4n 6 - a: iiiot'; i C `.„ miii EIS ,... - MO 1 NMI . I la t am=MN —u ■ 1011.A i1.Fit...,.,.., . _rag .. r..A• r �_ in , t 'kV s• � 1. .r7 3I�■ �% Ib ; 416 � • y � g , ,_ yA a // �I -i-k._ +,?.all■ I i li x . ` r s SERVICE AREA FOR WATER IMPACT FEES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE J`�x3-9 PLATE 2 e , .,_,,.,.., .. _ ,r,„...„,..,. , s• uthla it _ • 1 , . .$ =z"�.m • ,d, -._ I_ :...... .- 11 lifil yyy•••��� �:�__ • 1 � I °_ _ ,i ' -' sf`.r01'. -. e _' b ,- o \i_j . � k.. 1 ' ' ' r , mst I - -- , ;- / % ' m 11® ex: , M a. UM RBI LIIII; A . � ��17111111: � , �/ _� �17 n ::....=ge=11 - .., kfTs.. .0:4i,...q.....3_,..: ,,,,,,.......„....... _ 0 IIIIP - mesK111111112tvAsm El= 2 . ...„.:,_ .701•9 '1/4 ;;;;Irr q . r ,rla� I_ _ It et 9 • ii, .„•-• ..., ., , ,„_„,,,„„, .. tC' �:N'=nil:10"W" 'LM�■ —�1 • `ar1t''. r t y.:�:. Cj:+ ■H.t■► •- I "3 i - 1 - -.rr • ate.: 1� y� ....1 I.a ��i Z°j T ■fit■■■/ LJ■l{� ' a 11 Ili: ;IMMO fgr tatillill _ wititilor gi.r.,,,r,,.... 01„.1 . °u �irratl •.e •'i1ua.: °.NJ.» ae ut - :. ■ is I" j l 91.11111111 !Pirating M •A '�•' ••a a -..gym B�a'. 1r/�t\Y! �_�m:a'rr1=1212' -•- + ■ {.. a■■sa &.. =. 71115804.1111i ka111 antn. !twK@�-� •�=- a=�...alY. °��ri O0 1 ei 1 1t1 .. ■ 1. 15. mil 1 �{.�"'' .a + ` '%. team n_ �� ammo `•�� {6� r __-s.. , ;� I r a�..^.. i� i ' rnhummt.tn°.i h__ i `■ I pram_ ,--„.fir cr.ot � ,,0 :y;� {��'�; -f�:J", °I:t._ _ A .!•s •°• i:li{ � r - ' ixite � ili °t•!.k%r�i.°:°.iw: ��� atikeaWI r• iP N u _ �-1 II ,..,G ..d. • gam i�I�_��"1�1 �.:+:QQQ_��� of L .'• �me NI—� FM "' ��74i Mal 1 . y _ —r � m iu _ • -'Q .regw" 9 ``,n. =WM • =ram -JI �' `i t. •��-i •`!V1S M!EIEf�i�. �°'r�, r �i.�.tli f �i a , z MR,t,11--MM.,:tiagt: "" 17!„„:1, .r.:1 III Id Ise lk ' ... ,f' 41ZEi • ;�h�'��4 aT}�.',°�•.'. �=i: •?�013 ►E Cat °�i .i fir_'ME m1. 11 r ..■� ..1 i/ "I' Pre h.r I, f —s. igliiiiill�• , Ltd,✓•"`�?r::, .rmm i ,,i S' tr!"'t { , qqyy !II I( 1--- U dial' ,l� -.■€ 11 •/ M . CD SERVICE AREA FOR WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES r`` CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 7D PLATE 3 III. BASE DATA This section documents historical growth trends and base data for the City. This "benchmark" information provides a starting basis of 1995 data for the 10 year growth assumptions in the following section. One method of predicting future growth is looking at past growth. The historical growth rate for Southlake is shown below: TABLE 1 Annual Southlake % Change % Change 1960* 1,023 1970* 2,031 98.5 7.1 1980* 2,808 38.3 3.3 1990* 7,083 152.2 9.7 1995** 12,750 80.0 (5 yr. 12.6 increment) * Source: U.S. Census **Source: NCTCOG January 1, 1995 Another comparison and useful base data source for population growth is the past trends in residential construction. Table 2 shows the trend in residential building permits over the last ten years. 5 TABLE 2 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Year Single-Family 1985 212 1986 72 1987 33 1988 56 1989 51 1990 176 1991 197 1992 377 1993 517 1994 577 Total 2,268 Average/Year = 226.8 (1985-1994 Average/Year = 368.8 (1990-1994) 7 For the purposes of documenting changes in population, land use, density, and intensity, the data format to be used as a basis to formulate the land use assumptions will be principally population and employment. By taking a "snapshot" of existing land uses and considering the Master Plans of individual cities, NCTCOG has established population and employment estimates and projections for all cities in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. These estimates from NCTCOG were used as a basis for the projections for Southlake. 1. Population - The difference between the total of the NCTCOG 1990 population estimates by TSZ and the overall NCTCOG 1995 population estimate was allocated proportionally to individual TSZ's based on the proportional number of building permits issued by TSZ since 1990. (Southlakes's Community Development department maintains a summary of residential development indicating number of planned lots, platted lots, building permits issued and available lots by subdivision.) The 1995 population estimates by TSZ can be found in Appendix A. 2. Employment - The values for the 1995 employment by TSZ were deduced by a two step process. First, preliminary 1995 estimates by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for each TSZ were obtained by interpolating between the NCTCOG 1990 and 2010 employment estimates. Second, these values were compared to changes of zoning to nonresidential categories since 1990 -the date of the last available data from NCTCOG -to determine if the interpolation resulted in "under counts" and "over counts" by TSZ and/or SIC code versus the actual development in Southlake. As a result, the employment values were then adjusted upward to reflect major additional employment-retail development, new and expanded public schools,and the City of Southlake itself-and adjusted downward where development has not occurred. The 1995 employment estimates by TSZ can be found in Appendix B. The following table is a summary of the 1995 employment for the impact fee areas as a whole. TABLE 3 EXISTING EMPLOYMENT - 1995 1995 Basic Employment* 2,928 1995 Retail Employment* 179 1995 Service Employment* 689 1995 Total Employment* 3,796 *Source: NCTCOG (adjusted to January 1995) Prior to an evaluation and projection of future land use patterns, a thorough understanding of existing conditions is essential. A documentation of existing land use patterns was made and used as a base line for future growth projections. This also documents the present physical composition and condition of the City. • 8 To obtain accurate information on existing conditions, the existing land use inventory that was included in the land use assumption report prepared in June, 1993, was updated by the city staff to January, 1995, based on zoning changes during that period. In this inventory, the City was classified according to the following land use categories: Residential Single-Family Multi-Family Commercial Industrial Public/Quasi-Public Corps of Engineers Property Vacant Each of the above categories was counted and tabulated on a parcel-by-parcel basis and recorded for all areas of the City. Table 4 shows a summary of existing land uses for the area in Southlake's City Limits. TABLE 4 EXISTING LAND USE - 1995 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Percent of Acres Per Existing Land Use Acres Used" Total Area 100 Persons* Single-Family 4,324 31.0 33.9 Multi-Family, Duplex or Group Quarters 13 0.1 0.1 Commercial 138 1.0 1.1 Public/Quasi-Public 368 2.6 2.9 Industrial 350 2.5 2.8 Corps of Engineers Property 759 5.5 6.0 Total Developed Area 5,952 42.7 46.8 Vacant Land 7,976 57.3 Total Area(2) 13,928 100.0% Source: City of Southlake, Community Development Department * Based on population of 12,750 (')Gross acres, includes street and alley rights-of-way (2)Excludes Lake Grapevine 9 IV. TEN-YEAR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS Growth is characterized in two forms: population (residential) and employment (nonresidential land use). Several assumptions were necessary to arrive at reasonable growth rates for population and employment. The following assumptions have been made as a basis from which ten-year projections could be initiated. 1. Future land uses will occur as identified on the 1993 Future Land Use Plan 2. The City will be able to finance the necessary improvements to water, sewer and roadways to accommodate growth 3. School facilities will accommodate increases in population 4. Densities will be as projected based on anticipated zoning districts consistent with the 1993 Future Land Use Plan. 5. Known or anticipated development projects 6. Data received and used from the NCTCOG is generally accepted as the best available data. The ten-year projections or land use assumptions are based upon the policies established in the Future Land Use Plan and the establishment of a reasonable growth rate based on past trends. Considering the historical issuance of residential building permits (Table 2) and the historical development and subsequent absorption of lots within residential subdivisions, the anticipated growth rate the next 10 years is that which results from 400 residential building permits per year. For the last two years, the number of residential building permits issued has exceeded this amount. Using this growth rate, a population of approximately 25,000 was projected for the ten-year growth projection. This rate would generate a population of about 1,200 persons per year. The following shows the formula for calculating the ten-year growth assumptions: 400 dwelling units X 0.934 occupancy rate = 374 occupied dwelling units/year 374 occupied dwelling units/year X 3.322 household size = 1,241 persons/year 1,241 persons/year X 10 years = 12,410 persons growth 12,750 existing population + 12,410 growth = 25,160 population in ten years All projections and estimates are for January 1 of their respective years. This rate,which represents an approximate 7 percent compounded average annual growth rate, was determined to be a reasonable rate at which Southlake could be expected to grow. The annual growth rate from 1980 to 1990 was 9.7% and the rate for 1990-95 was higher at 12.6%, but 7 percent corresponds more 10 closely with NCTCOG projections. This rate, although slightly higher than the NCTCOG rate of 5.2 percent resulting in a population projection of 21,516 for the year 20052, is a conservative growth rate. The 2005 population estimate of 25,160 was allocated by assigning the increase in households to TSZ's based on known or anticipated residential development. Then the total households were multiplied by the average household size to arrive at a population by TSZ. Starting with the adjusted 1995 employment totals, the ten-year employment projections were derived by prorating the NCTCOG 20-year (2010) projections equally for each year (approximately 307 employees per year).3 Each 2005 employment estimate by TSZ was reviewed by the city staff and revised, if necessary, to reflect known or anticipated employment. Employment values were adjusted upward to reflect the additional employment centers, such as schools and City Hall, not accounted for by NCTCOG, and values were adjusted downward where residential development since 1990 has reduced the land available for employment - generating land uses. Appendices "A" and "B` show the ten-year growth projections for population and employment for each TSZ. Tables 5A and 5B show a summary of the population and employment projections for Southlake. ?f 2The NCTCOG population projection for Southlake for 2010 is 26,333; if the increase is distributed equally each year, the projected growth in 2005 would be 21,516. 31990 NCTCOG employment, 3,473; 2010 NCTCOG employment, 9,613; 307 employees X 15 years = 4,605 + 3,473 = 8,078 rounded to 8,100 employees. 11 TABLE 5A TEN-YEAR POPULATION PROJECTIONS - SOUTHLAKE 1995 2005 Roadway Units Population Units Population Service Areas 1 110 349 330 1,023 2 330 1,112 700 2,173 3 1,178 3,618 1,782 5,528 4 726 2,290 1,444 4,481 5 300 929 650 2,017 6 475 1,360 1,478 4,584 7 732 2,304 1,125 3,491 8 257 785 599 1,860 Total 4,108 12,747 4 8,108 25,157 TABLE 5B TEN-YEAR EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS - SOUTHLAKE 1995 2005 Basic 2,928 6,240 Retail 179 743 Service 689 1,117 Total 3,796 8,100 Changes in population and employment affect the use of land. In the case of Southlake, increased population and employment is due to the conversion of agricultural land into residential and other land uses. These land use changes aid in the determination of demand for additional water, wastewater and roadway facilities. Table 6 shows the projected land use requirements for a population of 25,000. Residential densities were calculated based upon permitted densities in the City's Zoning Ordinance. TThese represent actual values. The differences between these values and those corresponding values previously mentioned can be attributed to "rounding." 12 TABLE 6 PROJECTED TEN-YEAR FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Future Acres Acres Required Per for Land Use Category 100 Persons 25,000 People Single-Family 28.3 7,075 Multi-Family 0.1 25 Commercial 1.1 275 Public/Quasi-Public 2.0 500 Industrial 2.0 500 Corps of Engineers Property N/A 759 Total 9,134 V. ULTIMATE PROJECTIONS An ultimate or holding capacity land use and population projection was also established. First, known densities of development were considered. Then, based on the remaining developable vacant land in Southlake, densities as recommended in the Future Land Use Plan and densities of anticipated development projects were applied. The ultimate population of the City of Southlake is a function of residential land use area (acres), housing density (dwelling units per acre), and population density (persons per dwelling unit). Based on the land uses identified on the Land Use Plan, the total ultimate land use areas of low density single-family housing, medium density single- family housing, and multi-family housing is known. The area of each residential classification was multiplied by its respective housing density and population density,and the products were summed to obtain the ultimate population. Housing density values are from observed existing residential development and/or current residential zoning regulations. The following table shows the acres required for a population of 45,660. The holding capacity of 45,660 persons and land use is based on the Future Land Use Plan and the following assumptions: 1. Mixed Use category was allocated among Single-Family (10%), Multi-Family (2%) and Commercial Categories (88%). 2. Low Density and Medium Density Residential categories were allocated to the Single-Family category. 13 3. Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories were allocated to the Public/Quasi-Public category. TABLE 7 ULTIMATE FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Acreage at Land Use Category Build-Out Residential (Low Density) 4,781 Residential (Medium Density) 4,381 Mixed Use (Residential) 322 Public and Semi-Public 647 Park and Open Space 216 Commercial 2,356 Industrial 466 Corps Property 759 Total 13,928 VI. SUMMARY The data used to compile these land use assumptions were from two sources--the Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use Plan) for the City of Southlake and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) data base used for traffic modeling purposes. The existing base data was prepared by the City of Southlake's Community Development department and information from the U. S. Census. The ten-year growth projections were calculated based upon reasonable growth rates and trends based on the Future Land Use Plan. NCTCOG projections for population and employment were used for comparison. The NCTCOG data was utilized principally to compile employment projections by TSZ for roadway impact fees. Ultimate projections were based on the holding capacity of vacant land using land use types as shown on the Future Land Use Plan and applying densities as established by development policies in the Plan and known proposed development plans. The land use assumptions may be summarized as follows: Southlake presently contains approximately 21.5 square miles within the City Limits of which 42.7% is developed. It is not anticipated Southlake will be able to expand its municipal boundaries beyond its present limits. 14 • Existing population of Southlake in 1995 - 12,750 • A compounded annual growth rate of approximately 7% was used to calculate the Southlake 10-year growth projections. • The ten-year growth projection for Southlake is 25,157 or about 25,000. • The ultimate population of Southlake is approximately 45,660. 15 APPENDICES 16 ,513-o7D DATA FORMAT The LUA database (appendices A and B), as well as future projections were formulated according to the following format and categories: Appendix A - Population Roadway Service Area - Correlates to the roadway service areas identified on Plate 1. 1995 Dwelling Units - Total number of all living units including single-family, duplex, multi- family, and group quarters. The number of existing housing units has been shown for the base year (January, 1995). 1995 Households - The adjusted number of households (Section II - Base Data). 1995 Population - The adjusted population (Section III). 2005 Dwelling Units - Projected housing units by service area for the year 2005 (ten-year growth projections). 2005 Households The projected number of households (Section IV). 2005 Population - The projected population obtained by adding the projected increase to the 1995 population (Section IV). Traffic Survey Zone/TSZ - Traffic survey zones previously established by NCTCOG and the Highway Department used for data collection purposes and termed TSZs in this report. Appendix B - Employment Roadway Service Area - Correlates to the roadway service areas identified on Plate 1. Three classifications were used for employment and compiled for each roadway service area: 1995 Basic BASIC (SIC Code # 1000 to 5199) - 1995 land use activities that produce goods and services such as those exported outside the local economy; manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. 1995 Retail RETAIL (SIC Code # 5200 to 5999) - 1995 land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented to household sector such as grocery stores, restaurants, etc. 1995 Service SERVICE (SIC Code # 6000 to 9999) - 1995 land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as financial, insurance,government,and other professional administrative offices. 1995 Total Employment The 1995 total of the Basic, Retail and Service categories 2005 Basic BASIC (SIC Code # 1000 to 5199) - 2005 land use activities that produce goods and services such as those exported outside the local economy; manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. 2005 Retail RETAIL (SIC Code # 5200 to 5999) -2005 land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented to household sector such as grocery stores, restaurants, etc. 2005 Service SERVICE (SIC Code # 6000 to 9999) - 2005 land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as financial, insurance,government,and other professional administrative offices. 2005 Total Employment The 2005 total of the Basic, Retail and Service categories Traffic Survey Zone/TSZ - Traffic survey zones previously established by NCTCOG and the Highway Department used for data collection purposes and termed TSZs in this report. �a-aa APPENDIX A 10-YEAR POPULATION PROJECTIONS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Roadway 1995 1995 1995 2005 2005 2005 Traffic Sur- Service Area Dwelling Households Population Dwelling Households Population vey Zone Units Units 1 108 103 345 327 305 1,013 9200 1 2 2 4 3 3 10 9219 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14036 ......... .... .... ........... ......... Sub-total 110 105 349 330 308 t,02 2 4 4 6 4 4 13 8330 2 72 68 215 134 125 415 8450 2 248 261 874 453 423 1,405 8451 2 2 2 5 18 17 57 8454 2 4 4 12 91 85 283 8492 Sub-total 330 339 1,112 700 654 2,173 3 5 5 14 7 7 23 8441 3 632 555 . 1,887 980 915 3,040 8456 3 490 466 1,584 744 695 2,309 8457 3 11 10 24 11 10 33 8493 3 40 38 109 40 37 123 19017 Sub-total 1,178 1,074 3,618 1,782 1,66452 :>:``< 4 87 83 269 108 101 336 • 8324 4 144 137 458 327 305 1,013 8452 4 57 54 163 124 116 385 8453 4 383 364 1,219 699 653 2,169 8464 4 2 2 6 2 2 8465 4 0 0 0 3 3 . .;1Q 8466 4 45 43 144 145 135 448 8467 4 8 8 31 36 34 113 8468 Sub-total 726 691 2,290 1,444 1,349 4,481 �5,3 3 Roadway 1995 1995 1995 2005 2005 2005 Traffic Sur- Service Area Dwelling Households Population Dwelling Households Population vey Zone Units Units 5 106 101 338 236 220 731 8320 5 22 21 46 15 14 47 8322 5 114 108 361 181 169 561 8323 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 8335 5 58 55 184 218 204 678 8469 Sub-total 300 285 929 650 607 2,017 6 288 229 767 848 792 2,631 8470 6 187 177 593 630 588 1,953 8482 Sub-total 475 406 1,360 1,478 1,380 4;5841; ': 7 32 30 77 73 68 226 ::...' 8460 7 547 520 1,742 834 779 2,588 8461 7 153 145 485 218 204 677 19019 -total 732 695 2,304 1,125 1,051 3,491 g 8 67 64 184 127 119 395 8458 8 150 140 473 254 237 787 8497 8 40 38 128 218 204 678 8500 Sub-total 257 242 785 599 560 1860 .......................... Total(1) 4,108 3,837 12,747 8,108(2) 7,573 25,157 (114108 X 0.934 occupancy rate = 3,837 X 3.322 persons per household = 12,747 4,108 existing dwelling units plus 4,000 future dwelling units = 8,108 X 0.934 = 7,573 X 3.322 = 25,157 s�-a iii APPENDIX B 10-YEAR EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Roadway 1995 1995 1995 1995 2005 2005 2005 2005 Traffic Service Basic Retail Service Total Basic Retail Service Total Survey Area(s) Emp. Emp. Zone 1 22 0 0 22 25 0 9 34 9200 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9219 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14036 Sub-total 22 0 0 22 25 0 9 34 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 8330 2 0 0 0 0 25 2 3 30 8450 2 20 15 82 117 97 18 91 206 8451 2 0 0 4 4 39 11 8 58 8454 2 2,202 17 0 2,219 • 2,685 90 25 2,800 8492 Sub-total 2,222 32 86 2,340 2,849 122 127 3,098 3 363 2 0 365 387 2 1 390 8441 3 0 0 0 0 650 10 40 700 8456 3 0 17 0 17 96 21 11 128 8457 3 0 0 0 0 157 15 6 178 8493 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 19017 Sub-total 363 19 0 382 1,294 48 58 1,400 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 8324 4 0 6 41 47 67 9 49 125 8452 4 1 0 22 23 58 43 29 130 8453 4 5 1 1 7 69 17 :MEHM4 90' 8465 4 0 0 0 0 26 4 3 33 8466 4 55 20 65 140 355 40 70 465 8467 4 0 15 95 110 227 15 100 342 8468 4 0 0 40 40 100 3 40 143 8464 Sub-total 61 42 264 367 903 133 296 1,332 5',Q-a5 Roadway 1995 1995 1995 1995 2005 2005 2005 2005 Traffic Service Basic Retail Service Total Basic Retail Service Total Survey 1(s) Emp. Emp. Zone ^46, 5 223 3 12 238 490 90 20 600 8320 5 11 11 25 47 25 100 225 350 8322 5 0 26 0 26 14 45 17 76 8323 5 0 0 50 50 0 0 75 75 8335 5 17 4 33 54 200 9 41 250 8469 Sub-total 251 44 120 415 729 244 378 1,351 6 0 2 4 6 79 8 13 100 8470 6 5 4 31 40 63 8 3 74, 8482 Sub-total 5 6 35 46 142 16 16 174 7 0 34 0 34 25 150 25 200 8460 7 0 0 60 60 130 6 14 150 8461 7 0 0 30 30 8 1 1 10 . 19019 SL .ai 0 34 90 124 163 157 40 360 8 0 0 60 60 18 1 156 175 8458 8 0 0 0 0 49 2 5 56 8497 8 4 2 34 40 68 20 32 120 8500 Sub-total 4 2 94 100 135 23 193 3541 Total 2,928 179 689 3,796 6,240 743 1,117 8,100 : ‘,_5",3-aL GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS 1. Advisory Committee means the capital improvements advisory committee established by the City for purposes of reviewing and making recommendations to the City Council on adoption and amendment of the City's impact fee program. 2. Area-related facility means a capital improvement or facility expansion which is designated in the impact fee capital improvements plan and which is not a site-related facility. Area- related facility may include a capital improvement which is located offsite, or within or on the perimeter of the development site. 3. Assessment means the determination of the amount of the maximum impact fee per service unit which can be imposed on new development. 4. Capital improvement means either a roadway facility, a water facility or a wastewater facility, with a life expectancy of three or more years, to be owned and operated by or on behalf of the City. 5. City means the City of Southlake, Texas. 6. Credit means the amount of the reduction of an impact fee due, determined under this ordinance or pursuant to administrative guidelines, that is equal to the value of area-related facilities provided by a property owner pursuant to the City's subdivision or zoning regulations or requirements, for the same type of facility. 7. Facility expansion means either a roadway facility expansion, a water facility expansion or a sewer facility expansion. 8. Final plat approval means the point at which the applicant has complied with all conditions of approval in accordance with the City's subdivision regulations and the plat has been approved for filing with Tarrant or Denton County. 9. Impact fee means either a fee for roadway facilities, a fee for water facilities or a fee for wastewater facilities imposed on new development by the City pursuant to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code in order to generate revenue to fund or recoup the costs of capital improvements or facility expansion necessitated by and attributable to such new development. Impact fees do not include the dedication of rights-of-way or easements for such facilities, or the construction of such improvements, imposed pursuant to the City's zoning or subdivision regulations. 10. Impact fee capital improvements plan means either a roadway capital improvements plan, a water capital improvements plan or a wastewater capital improvements plan adopted or revised pursuant to these impact fee regulations. A - 1 11. Land use assumptions means the projections of population and employment growth and associated changes in land uses, densities and intensities, over at least a ten-year period, adopted by the City, as may be amended from time to time, upon which the capital improvements plans are based. 12. Land use equivalency table means a table converting the demands for capital improvements generated by various land uses to numbers of service units, as may be amended from time to time. 13. New development means the subdivision of land; the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment,conversion,structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any structure; or any use or extension of the use of land; any of which increases the number of service units. 14. Plat has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Plat includes replat. 15. Platting has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Platting includes replattinq. 16. Property owner has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Property owner includes the developer for the new development. 17. Recoupment means the imposition of an impact fee to reimburse the City for capital improvements which the City has previously oversized to serve new development. 18. Roadway means any freeway, expressway, principal or minor arterial or collector roadways designated in the City's adopted Thoroughfare Plan, as may be amended from time to time. Roadway does not include any roadway designated as a numbered highway on the official federal or Texas highway system. 19. Roadway capital improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the roadway facilities or roadway expansions and their costs for each road service area, which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 20. Roadway expansion means the expansion of the capacity of an existing roadway in the City, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing roadway to better serve existing development. 21. Roadway facility means an improvement or appurtenance to a roadway which includes, but is not limited to, rights-of-way, whether conveyed by deed or easement; intersection improvements; traffic signals; turn lanes; drainage facilities associated with the roadway; A - 2 �5/3-a9 street lighting or curbs. 22. Service area means either a roadway service area, a water service area or wastewater benefit area within the City, within which impact fees for capital improvements or facility expansion will be collected for new development occurring within such area and within which fees so collected will be expended for those types of improvements or expansions identified in the type of capital improvements plan applicable to the service area. 23. Service unit means the applicable standard units of measure shown on the land use equivalency table in the Impact Fees Capital Improvements Plan which can be converted to vehicle miles in p.m. peak hour, for roadway facilities, or one inch (1") water meter equivalents, for water or for wastewater facilities,which serves as the standardized measure of consumption, use or generation attributable to the new unit of development. 24. Site-related facility means an improvement or facility which is for the primary use or benefit of a new development and/or which is for the primary purpose of safe and adequate provision of roadway, water or wastewater facilities to serve the new development, and which is not included in the impact fees capital improvements plan and for which the property owner is solely responsible under subdivision or other applicable development regulations. 25. Utility connection means installation of a water meter for connecting a new development to the City's water system, or connection to the City's wastewater system. 26. Wastewater facility means a wastewater interceptor or main, lift station or other facility included within and comprising an integral component of the City's collection system for wastewater. Wastewater facility includes land, easements or structure associated with such facilities. Wastewater facility excluded a site-related facility. 27. Wastewater facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing wastewater improvement for the purpose of serving new development, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing sewer facility to serve existing development. 28. Wastewater capital improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the wastewater facilities or wastewater expansions and their associated costs which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 29. Water facility means a water interceptor or main, pump station, storage tank or other facility included within the comprising an integral component of the City's water storage or distribution system. Water facility includes land, easements or structures associated with such facilities. Water facility excludes site-related facilities. A - 3 30. Water facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing water facility for the purpose of serving new development, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing water improvement to serve existing develop- ment. 31. Water improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the water facilities or water expansions and their associated costs which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 32. Water meter means a device for measuring the flow of water to a development, whether for domestic or for irrigation purposes. A - 4 S13-3/ City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM (111101 September 29, 1995 To: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager From: Kathleen G. Farrell Subject: SYAC 1995-96 Appointments Attached is Resolution 95-40 which recommends the appointment of representatives to the Southlake Youth Advisory Commission (SYAC). Student selections were based on several criteria including: past involvement in the program, attendance at meetings, input from the high school and middle school, and a written application. The commissioners will be notified of their appointment after the Council votes on Resolution 95-40. (OR :GF • City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION 95-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SOUTHLAKE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City Council has created a Youth Advisory Commission to provide more youth participation in the affairs of the City and to create a forum for youth-to-adult communication; and, WHEREAS, the City Council by Ordinance # 610 must annually appoint the members of the Commission ; now, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of the resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The following are hereby appointed as youth representatives for the Southlake Youth Advisory Commission: Grade 7: Grade 9: Grade 11: Haley Roberts Corey Fickes Vacant Randi Williams Bobby Hall Vacant Vacant Ashley Farhat Vacant Grade 8: Grade 10: Grade 12: Venessa Berry Erin Anderson Amanda McCutcheon Ryan Bradley Kim Harris Deavon Moore Mandy Creecy Kimberly Springer Angela Meyer Section 3: The following are hereby approved as officers for the Southlake Youth Advisory Commission: Chairperson: Brydie Andrews (Grade 11) Vice Chair, High School: Morgan Rudy (Grade 9) Vice Chair, Middle School: Raiman Johnson (Grade 8) School Liaison: Kristin Chamber (Grade 11) L . kbr Section 4: This resolution is hereby effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Mayor Gary Fickes Sandra L. LeGrand (re 3-c- 3 City of Southlake Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-181, Second Reading ZA 95-79,Rezoning and Concept Plan/Greenlee Business Park REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park, 6.715 acres situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, legally described as the northern portion of Lot 7R and all of Lot 8,Block 1,Greenlee Business Park, Phase I and being revised to Lot 8R, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I. The development proposes thirteen(13) single family residential lots. LOCATION: 1475' North of East Continental Blvd. on the west side of South Kimball Ave. OWNER: David and Beverly Thorne and ELFM Corporation APPLICANT: Terra Land Development Company CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial NO. NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: One (1)written response received within the 200 feet notification area: • South Kimball Avenue JV., do James F. Lunsford, P.O. Box 1685, Dallas, Texas 75221, in favor P &Z ACTION: August 17, 1995;Approved to Table(7-0)ZA95-79, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park until the September 7, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the public hearing. Due to Resolution 95-24 (case limitations), the Commission was unable to take action on this item. September 7, 1995; Approved (6-1) ZA95-79, Rezoning and Concept Plan 7A-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK (60;zRDINANCE NO. 480-181, SECOND READING A95-79, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 2 for Greenlee Business Park subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated August 11, 1995. Commissioner Johnson opposed the request because the Land Use Plan indicated Industrial for this property and because the existing zoning for the properties to the North, South and East is Industrial. COUNCIL ACTION: • September 19, 1995; Approved (4-1) First Reading of Ordinance No. 480- 181, ZA95-79, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park subject to Plan Review Summary dated September 15, 1995. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has made no further revisions since the last meeting. Attached is the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated September 15, 1995. The applicant is purchasing all of Lot 8 and the northern portion of Lot 7R. They have submitted an amended plat for staff review moving the common (ker property line to the South to match the lot configuration shown on the concept plan. It is their intention to submit a plat revision of Greenlee Business Park and to incorporate the thirteen lots into the Cambridge Place Addition. Vs- KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-79ZC.2CC (haw 7A-2 - .0. 98.4c- 1 1 1 - (i* cY NHALLN ; I;7? fjiL' - ii; 4. %RN�r -SA _ 111/ I NORTHWEST Iii ' S©® II J 1 2Ari 1 1 I /` : 1 F E , 1 ; ,i MAY s Rv _ _ - ` - 7 Grp, a- .— --—--—_b�--I706) --—-2A2�.,- EAST SdIMIA!(E .t �� "i a 1 a 7A L x 2 3 182A 182 le l , _ -r_ "+ i R 8 P ,e2¢ Q 11►0,EK x -- --'--t-- , A Go 0 1 _ ,s k 5 e�s P R t. �r_ 306 k E" 2A3A, IV► ^ -- 181 O �� .�EAtA 11" IS// 2A 7/J 7A2A 7AIA 2 , 6 Pg4lttt IX • f` 5E 2 -- 3 AY ale 2A-1 2AX i 7 , 1 , 7A3A ic X 00 Pro ,��A< I 1 o 1 ID , 1 ttE 1 • 1 c _ - CIg r�oW T6NOMI 3A lA ,- _Pt JOH nM a. f�RE N �1 1�6 A< 3 1roM - s .? I V r ) S �015 3D ivi vRN coy611, ,A:EJ I ; , "-Q I101 I 17,3 20 Ac ' ilO5A1 ' .1106 K I �� -- -- -- a�.fv.. HALLO 1 ��.,,, 3 • t GRAIN 1 =IRK• A-80.1 16A1 1 0 ill ; 3 6.13 At 6A , •AAMO�Sl. 1 UR a1 I O m a 22 2C1 I E y;;1 / �-,: T c k ' ` R�Et`1LE+ t 6A IA2 i-; INE- - - -_HMOOW • G60 6E BV.J - 61 kIO Ae 10 I /� R�� M n 1A1 247 ' --- --------'----. `S.�" fEkNV IA9U6D®UV QIS® - [As, co1I,wEM1Al x� _- -_—__—I- _- ` ` ' OP' 4�A , Y ,m - - --'A- 2/ Y X1, • IA .. we. a ,etA . _-- y,If,r RA , R • V 6.3 At ,= 1= 1Mq 7 161pt 161Q r: 136 K !..IiI 4 I ,K' 166 rail _._.__ ,e, •— + : t to C�, 6 R , 1610 t�tl] e A 1, 16w NII 1n1 ,r tNA N X J 16W1 MtM le{! N ADD IA I N.66 Ac INU 160 _yaw 1A1 1334 Ac ' X6 1 31.61 Ac 1go ,• yaw _ _—�A 'A X6 I M/c 111.• 1.-_ - .__fir,.. 7. _ .. _A_'3 _ __ .. _ INO Nt/ L ...._ If 1 -._- - - IA71 TRACT MAP - 1A1 iCA am:__--- ---"-17, -- : . =. .A05cIl1M 51, A i,11 M '<,tA d .u,u 7 (. -11 .I 110.10 I b =�1�(I..G�Ir�i( SI.YIN I '451 1 .DC�R1 "NiCn1t;53 � I 7A-3 1!`l. e,,,d>SI�.'()r N(' N , 1 i __1 ► -:,��� I II ---If 1 �,t,At y.jAjr�- A,'`'�A Y}I A )YI I I I I 6G 4A1 - 6A 6 H Memo Industrial L Planners SI---I Spin #7 Representative r1 <, , \ 6 < 1 Peter Sporrer N ......-1 J ,_r_ "I-1" . "I-1" Southlake JV `- Pumpco Inc. • "SF-20A" "I-1" LA South Kimball Avenue JV 1 "I- 1� r I-1 i --13 - Q1 631 __.. 1....4 E L F MCorp. "I-1" I "SF-20A" r- \ N J 'l r-r.,) u ,) , _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ ►D 6E 1.) . 1 / Cn , L ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING J 7A-4 City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY "ase No: ZA 95-79 Review No: Two Date of Review:9/15/95 Project Name: Concept Plan SF-20A Zoning-8R.Block 1.Greenlee Business Park.Phase I.6.715 Acres being a revision of Lots 7R & 8. Block 1. Greenlee Business Park. Phase I. Cabinet A. Slide 1930, P.R.T.C.T. and situated in the John A. Freeman Survey Abst. #529 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Terra Land Development Company Goodwin&Marshall. Inc. 920 S. Peytonville Avenue 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100. Southlake. Texas 76092 Fort Worth. Texas 76112 Phone: (817) 620-5373 Phone: (817)429-4373 Fax : Fax : (817)446-3116 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9.//95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS ICILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Correct the Land Use Designation(L.U.D.)for the Southlake Joint Venture tract adjacent to the west line of the project to"Medium Density Residential". A 35' . ' ding setback line is required on both street frontages for . .rner lot(Ord. No. 480, Sec. 4 pg. 17, and Section 14.5a). In the past a reduction of 5' to a 30' 'lding setback line has been allowed along the side street(Ord.No. 480, Sec. 4 pg. 20 fig. 4 . 3. If any proposed fencing and/or landscaping are to be provided, show the location,height and type on the plan. * The applicant must submit the amended plat of Lots 7R1 & 8R, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I,to the City for filing prior to the second reading of this zoning request to prevent a split lot zoning. * Although not required by ordinance,staff would appreciate placing"Case No.ZA 95-79" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 9/25/95. All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and include an 11"x 17" revised reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Terra Land Development Company Goodwin&Marshall, Inc. David L. & Beverly A. Thorne, 7503 Tillman Hill Road, Colleyville, Texas 76034 ELFM Corporation 1300 Shady Oaks Lane,Fort Worth,Texas 76107 G:\W PF\REV\95\95-079CP.W PD 7A-5 „. • . . ....: -, . !I ki lit iii t' w („„,,,,„ ■ 0 z ...I mit.Ini 1... to Ili 1,1 . • - . re ill j in 1 •iu�'�!i S a l a < I ' i �;`i-tit;tt li, ill• •ti I ! !jtim1iIjii R R11 1 II •'41 11%, d 01 ; bIII . 111 0 apt t$hi.IN p3 .152-Vifilioioilif iii Z Da , 1, r vt.11 20 • i ii:al i i. 1: .. it I~ 3 ; 4 Of \ . .., li 1 p. 1§ III ' Ii !!L ( 'M•O'g .09) 1 'RAY 11YMIX }Limos { �� 1 Ali I . � 1 i (.. 1 . ,/ e 1 . i • f i!4e... , 111 1 ill 1 t . Ai, • : . ..i. ----2.--1; --,--,4) 1 I iii ill 1 4 ii '-t I 1 1 .. 1 -,4 g. . ...e �i -VI t tZ iiiii$1 !Pei i 1 ' s i. . , -.33 . -, t, - 1 ;II , . , •-...: k • 1. e II 1i is 11. >a IM _ _� '� I • • 1 uc C 1 1111 I l I I t . I x 1 , in ._ wriZs A g. I 1 11-1-k-Ir-----A OP --'1---1 L -. 1i: .- ' . i__ „„,,....„ il • "1 - 1 �j . . �— a v lit",..... K.I 4 7A-6 1 . • Cy, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-181 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 6.715 ACRES SITUATED IN THE JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 529, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERN PORTION OF LOT 7R AND ALL OF LOT 8, BLOCK 1,GREENLEE BUSINESS PARK,PHASE I AND BEING REVISED TO LOT 8R,BLOCK 1,GREENLEE BUSINESS PARK, PHASE I, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM"I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.., DISTRICT TO "SF-20A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND • Cre AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "I-1" Light Industrial District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and (imie WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person G:\ORD\CASES\480-181.2RD Page 1 7A-7 L., or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks-and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: G:\ORD\CASES\480-181.2RD Page 2 7A-8 Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City L., of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 6.715 acre tract of land situated in the John A.Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 529, legally described as the northern portion of Lot 7R and all of Lot 8, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I and being revised to Lot 8R, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "I-1" Light Industrial to "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. (60, Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. G:\ORD\CASES\480-181.2RD Page 3 7A-9 Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this grdinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law,and it is so ordained. PASSED.AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of. , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY (taw G:\ORD\CASES\480.181.2RD Page 4 7A-10 (tirf PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY C.,„ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G:\ORD\CASES\480-181.2RD Page 5 7A-11 flhoir EXHIBIT "A" BEING a 6.715 acre tract of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being all of Lot 8R, Block 1 of the Amended Plat of Greenlee Business Park, Phase I, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Cabinet , Slide of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of those same two tracts of land as described in deed to David L. Thorne and wife, Beverly A. Thorne, recorded in Volume 11734, Page 1795 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (DRTCT) and to ELFM Corporation, recorded in Volume 9885, Page 826, DRTCT and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod set in the west line of South Kimball Avenue (60' R.O.W) at the northeast corner of said Lot 8R, Block 1 of the Amended Plat of Greenlee Business Park,-Phase I, said point lying in the south line of a tract of land as described in deed to Pumpco, Inc., recorded in Volume 8278, Page 266 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 00°07'23" E, along the west line of said South Kimball Avenue, 422.27 feet to a 1/2" iron rod set at the corner common to the southeast corner of said Lot 8R, Block 1 and the northeast corner of Lot 7R1, Block I of said Amended Plat of Greenlee Business Park, Phase I; (, 'HENCE S 89°00'22" W, departing the west line of said South Kimball Avenue, along the line common to the south line of said Lot 8R and the north line of said Lot 7R1, 691.90 feet to a 1/2" iron rod set at the corner common to the southwest corner of said Lot 8R and the northwest corner of said Lot 7R1, said point lying in the east line of a tract of land as described in deed to Southlake Joint Venture, recorded in Volume 9232, Page 708, DRTCT; THENCE N 00°20'40" W (Reference Bearing), along the east line of said Southlake Joint Venture tract, 422.25 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found at the corner common to the northwest corner of said Lot 8R, Block 1 and the southwest corner of said Pumpco, Inc. tract; THENCE N 89°00'22" E, along the line common to the north line of said Lot 8R and the south line of said Pumpco, Inc. tract, 693.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 292,480 square feet or 6.715 acres of land. (we G AO RD\CAS FS\480.181.2 RD Page 6 7A-12 a (600e I t\1 • 6. r. : il ill 111 il 171,4 11 1• . . t tgi VI 11 p, " ''•�E'JII1 iiiiLHJ j:MI sJjw I iljgls i - 0 pa a ti..... i: 1IiIhI 4 3!:4 1 !IP PS81 1111 N ° i �- 8 a rad Illit! ! . 11._-- ,, 3h �! .Y E € - ' 14 E...-- • � II k' ( 'M'O'n .09! E8 It 'SAY 11YQY(IX HSIIOS g I --- _33�!__ i o0os- -- -- --- PQ ^(lhoe' M •i - i k 1 1 /t IA. , Rii k- -- j1 , fie 0 � j w • I - 1 g 11i � � Q # 1 I -- -. -c I .1-1- ---1 _ $ z ll 13 = : ----��- �— A -_ w24;4 1 ( xa ' olive if .. -7: 41# I C 4li .` i I g I i j #3 g I : • __is.44. ... . 4 1 n .I. i 4 • 9 �Il, 4 1 /419z A i g. "1 I 1—.. . 1-kir----1 i i . . .. . . . __ ] 1 I r. - 1 x I cn • "la - k-- 1 : .:::. ki �'J t 1 h 4;1 v ... wr \ Z� (ibp, '-N._ %... % \ 1 iliv A . - (_ ( .... '...1 it v 1 .), It m r. _. ......, .. ...- . .... tit • 7A-13 ' City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-179,First Reading ZA 95-73, Rezoning and Concept Plan/Solana (Residential) REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Residential), 199.2 acres situated in the W. Medlin Survey,Abstract No. 1958,the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015,being portions of Tracts 1A1,2A2,2A3,2A5, 2A7,the R.D. Price Survey,Abstract No. 1207,being all of Tracts 1, 1B, 1C, 1 C 1, 1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E1, 1F, 1F1, 1G, 1H, 1J1, 3A, 3A1, 3A1A, 3A1A1, 3A1A2, 3A2, 3A3, 3A3A, 3A3A1, 3A4, 3A4A, 3A4B, 3C, 4A, 4A1, 4B, 4B1, 4B2, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1, and includes all of Lot 4, Block A, MTP-IBM Addition No.1 as recorded in Volume 388-211,Page 68,P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G, Slide 208,P.R.D.C.T. This development proposes separate phases of single family detached residential (Product Type "A") with one phase having the flexibility of alternative living products(Product Types "B," "C," and "D"),either smaller lot single family detached,two family dwellings, or multi-family dwellings. LOCATION: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114), East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove St., and West of North White Chapel Blvd. OWNER: MTP-IBM Phase II &III Joint Venture APPLICANT: Maguire Thomas Partners CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District REQUESTED ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/Flood Plain NO.NOTICES SENT: Twenty-four(24) 8A-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E.HAWK (woeORDINANCE NO.480-179,FIRST READING ZA95-73,ZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 2 RESPONSES: Four(4) written responses received within the 200' notification area: • W. P. Fletcher, 116 Sweet St., Southlake, Texas 76092 1st notice: opposed to the apartments which will bring more children for Carroll schools and less taxes,also more traffic on White Chapel than the road was built for. 2nd notice(courtesy letter): in favor of single dwellings, but opposed to multiple dwellings. • Bonnie B. Hays, 2735 N. White Chapel Blvd, Southlt,*e, was 76092, undecided, "Okay if as proposed." • J.W. Riemenschneider, P.O. Box 254, China Spring, Texas 76633-0245 1st notice: opposed, "I oppose the type C and type D. The single family would be okay. I think the type C and D would create a burden on the school." (p.• 2nd notice (courtesy letter): in favor of single dwellings, however, opposed to multi-family(apartments)because of the lack of taxes paid to the Carroll School. (letter received 08-18-95) • Martin W. Schelling, 601 W. Wall St., Grapevine, Texas 76051-5205, in favor, "It appears to be the best use for this portion of their property. Additionally, I am not opposed to the alternative living products." One (1)written response received outside the 200'notification area: • Harold D. Kruckenberg, 1730 Hunter's Creep Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed,"will lower property values while resulting in the other residents carrying an unfair school tax load." Seventy-two(72)written or phoned oppositions to multiple-family housing were received from persons outside of the 200'notification area as of 9/27/95. A list of the respondents is attached to this memo. P&Z ACTION: August 3, 1995;Approved to Table(4-1-1)ZA95-73,Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Residential)until the August 17, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the applicant's request and continue the public hearing. cpe August 17, 1995; Approved (6-0-1) ZA95-73, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Residential) subject to the Plan Review Letter dated August 11, 8A-2 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E.HAWK ORDINANCE NO.480-179,FIRST READING ZA95-73,ZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 3 1995 deleting item#2 to allow Product Type B lot coverage as follows: not more than twenty-five(25%)of the lots shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty percent (50%) of the lot area and seventy-five percent (75%)or more of the lots shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding forty percent(40%)of the lot area and adding the following requirements: 1) Multi-Family Units: no more than 50% of the units will be developed under the 850 square feet requirement with a minimum requirement of 650 square feet. 2) Southeast Portion of the Property: no more than 10cres in that portion will be for ancillary uses having a boundary starting at the northwest portion of the City property, heading northwest to the intersection of the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard. 3) "C-3" General Commercial District: exclude the permitted uses for ice and roller skating rinks; gasoline service stations; tires, (or batteries, and auto accessory sales from the district. 4) Bufferyards: delete the bufferyard requirement shown on the Concept Plan;but establish bufferyard requirement at the Site Plan stage. 5) Produc/'ype B S' e Yard Adjacen to a Street: have a side yard adjacent to a street of n6t less tharf ten(10) feet. COUNCIL ACTION: September 5, 1995; Approved to Table (6-0-1) ZA95-73, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Residential) until the September 19, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. September 19, 1995; Approved to Table (5-0) ZA95-73, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Residential)until the October 3, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No.3 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated September 29, 1995. 01- G/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-73ZC.3CC 8A-3 (101., Written and Phoned Opposition to ZA95-73 and ZA95-74 (72 total, through 9/27/95) Name Address Phone Nadine Wolf 1360 Cross Timber Drive 488-5373 Rick Borkowski 1201 Cypress Creek Circle 488-1479 Carolyn Bowman 1021 E. Continental Blvd. 481-8363 Deborah Andrup 302 Lakecrest Dr. 251-1641 Joann Johnson 1404 Meadow Lane 488-1415 John Keller 2906 W. Southlake Blvd. "" Dawn Johnson 1005 Quail Run Road 424-3422 Susan Hampton 421-1488 Janie Hammers 421-0734 Rick& Dawn Davis 1655 Creekside 214-312-3226 Krista Kline 424-0878 Glen Payne 1214 Whispering Lane James & Sandra Christian 4470 Homestead Drive Greg Knudson 491-4921 Carol Norsrip 305 Blanco 329-7420 Deborah Sheffield 424-3309 Glenda Sorrells 481-8309 Keith Larson 500 Ginger Court Thomas Lontley 3464 Southlake Park 488-8617 David Bedell 913 Chimney Hill 421-1417 Mrs. Harold Kruckenberg 1730 Hunter's Creek 488-2192 Kim Faszczuk 911 Chimney Hill 421-8765 Rick Dahlson 424-1066 thir., Alan Mur 481-8492 8A-4 Sherry Pichler 805 Shadow Glen 329-4881 Mr. & Mrs. Tom Longley 3464 Southlake Park 488-8617 Al Parry 105 Brock Drive Sharon Wright 160 Creekway Bend Marilyn Morgan 706 Essex Court 329-1680 Mr. &Mrs. Jack Edson 329-0052 Michail Bruns 300 Preakness Circle Barbara Smoral 1455 Bent Trail 421-2413 Nancy DePue 2810 Rainforest 214-820-4063 Louise Wilson 100 Stonewood Court (written) �. Angela George 491-0554 Michael O'Brien 3360 Hillside Mark Van Buskirk (written) Lie Carolyn Sifferman 1309 N. Ridge Dwayne Ediger 1307 Houston Court Sharon Carlen 705 Dominion Drive David Ault 3570 Burney lane Caroline Colister 424-0279 Deana Upton 421-6128 Karen Guger 1860 N. Kimball Ave. Cathy Colvin 310 Silverwood Circle Amy Easley 903 Emerald Blvd. Tamara McMillian 1023 Mission Drive Brry&Renee Johnson 1725 Sleepy Hollow Joe & Judy Davis 1650 N. Shady Oaks Wade& Trish Landers 171 Jellico Circle cr, Mary Beth Jamieson 2905 Burney Lane 8A-5 Keith& Kay Zimmerman 1420 Whispering Dell Court Kevin Afflack 1300 White Wing Court T. C. Robbins 1320 N. Ridge Dr. Cass Daniels Martha Washington 488-7263 Joan& Ken Katven 329-7724 Dotty Pittman 424-1631 Elizabeth Hanson 329-3972 Ted Christiansen 504 Timber Lake Anne Dunlap 800 Victoria Bob Furgerson 925 Midland Creek Drive 329-4817 David Johnson 1404 Meadow Lane 488-1415 Robert& Michelle Tusella 409 Shady Lane 214-277-7052 Kent Rudicel 1111 Crocket Court 488-3653 Brodie& Brenda Hardin 701 Shadow Glen 421-3959 Karen Mulder 2921 Flamingo (written) Brett& Kira Griffin 1214 Whispering Lane (written) Diane Johnson 329-4343 Jackie McClain 1372 Woodbrook Lane Marc& Elena Messina 303 Canyon Lake Drive (written) Ralph& Tina Poucher 1032 Diamond Blvd. (written) L 8A-6 Nine Village Circle Suite 500 Westlake TX 76262 817 430-0303 (we September 22, 1995 Mr. Greg Last CI? rA CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 N. Carroll Avenue •mil war Southiake, Texas 76092 o Re: Application of Re-Zoning Solana Residential P.U.D. Dear Greg: Pursuant to our discussions of Friday, we would like to amend our request for Residential PUD zoning on approximately 199.2 acres as set forth below: • The maximum allowable dwelling units for Product Types B, C and D will be 200 total units. (This stipulation will be (EY incorporated into the concept plan.) • For Product Type "D," please add the ;following additional Development Regulations: • Covered parking - covered parking at a ratio of one space per dwelling unit shall be provided. • Exterior facade - At least 75% of the combined exterior facades of all buildings constructed in this district shall be masonry or plaster. Please advise if you have any questions. Sincer y, Allen rp r-in nE-7-N wraith _ SEP 2 51995 cc: Tony Canonaco U ls=. L Richard Kuhlman Bob Goodwin Ocie Vest Chris Miller 8A-7 • a '; i 1 ....4....:....(21.4r4- 1----ir-------------- -!• REIS O. �11' F.1'rw_-x 1 - H. THROO ^, - (✓ 1 k ___ -_-��, —— I • u Hi F r i I L I P UIflhifl J - ;• ---- ----- • REW �. PRICE - �J( ! �i I I M JOsE H / 01 • I �o,rt O \/\ ---- sm. ! :..' `-...OAVIO-OOUTHIT I ••.•J/ •- _ gr • J. HENRY W9MLLS I •,/ TARRANT -�- 2 ^7 oAvro.00vTwJ (.. I . ,Y RR •11 01r • , o , Ac s-0-A4 A I' f- - fiii:' 1:c- I.... so,'" A.- .4:1,1, lop . . ,001:. a, ,__. .___ . .- : ' I.... I ''... r CAL TNROO9• I ,� - I siD"',pR . , 4 .i.___ I •f I ` ''') ."Ij. . Emzimp....,i, —..5 .../-1.:::.;.J.A. .S.L: : "Mb CM CCS I • ;.�i,D1 I , Ri ! .CSTA •MI di 'kilt pi DAD .� kk I mir .rminwe C-DART y`• La�•�-,•iir • g- 4 J.�YE.T �� ,I « MIN 1. IMillitiIiiiklifIII JMP �0'1 •. TI q'ill(3: z Kr., - ._ .. ., •"•. 1 f AOSALO- H. •j r'H07 G^`.•K• �t c _ .; •< _5 ( - LARKIPI H. CHIVERS j iip Da 1,11r hil "...v.11!1,1".:: .. ..77.71:77........ imit.ii •-— 110 *Asir Of r lea I ii IIVT tea• �� • TN s,4 f I M. OWL •FIN CHM DRgSs -"�• -..•:!,� - Illiml .y, �� leer f 4 4} al : VIL• / lida Ai... *N. .. • MEN • * go Anil k _ 1 9.,G..-_,,a, , , ...I - :•WAT'E; :r.: err _ eIa 'twoHALL v.:w.w.I . E''••• ••-• / 0,14_,..• ----o" .,MLR'' • --- ,t._» •,/ .I; ';-. -'. - is -�_-�(-'. • 1.w • �fi � t .^ocs i =1 • -` TRACT MAP =_: • V 3 i'! 1 ",- - i'I +; f 'it -- c1•1; 1 J1 8A-8 I w'� I . ADJACENT OWNERS L . -- v.3" DRUM A t'1.-..1 VI U IJ' \' U U 1 -i i /• I �zz iI:;:I:I:i ;::_._ 13 � SURVEY A-16070 N ...,....... ' 2 / 4 �\ • — — L. 1` DENTON / MIRY ,A C . HILLS I.W!; 1111 ! / I to Ti R "i' TARRANT cin A-742 / SURVEY A-1086 I/4 El / _ N 1 •—I--A'•i !• 3 3A 2 Nt (�, VI1 1 LIN f�1 2A Spin#2 Representative t I / svRaEY A-1958 ' I Martin Schelling 1A1 lid 2A2 2A7 2A3 1 __` A3 Li. / — t M lr 1 'Owl I r 1 I / IJ I . 9DN' 48 Hjl LID OR .. / -er "M -. I I rkP KtRKY10� '® r FI I 92, 481 4A1 00 3 . U. ART M ; 3A1 3A �/ l!- HART SURVEY A-1015 IJ yK. yi . 5 2A1 .r A1A 4 \ HELM — V. 3A1 3A48 \ 3 SUIRV£Y 2 1 A2 1 O� Al 3 �-5, I 3A3• I <<\kP 3A3A1 6 3 3A3A I I --- 1 OIEN,A.F. 1C � 1 -zwr 1 _- 2 US CORPS OF ENGINEERS 8 3 US CORPS OF ENGINEERS 3A2 C \ 8 , 4 PARK CITIES LIONS CLUB ' 10 5 CALLI,MICHAEL&DOROTHY • 9 6 SORG,KENNETH 11 7 RIEMENSCHNEIDER,J.W. 7 FLETCHER,W.P. 2 12 Au. 8 THACKER,KEVIN&KIMBERLY � 8 HARRIS,BARBARA ELLEN B. _ J A NV C o . U�7U Q I�T O�1 N i 21 .D 3 9 HAYS,BONNIE B. 181A t81At SURVEY A-1134 I 51A G.--g 10 SPARKS,PANSY O.CARPENTERD 14 7A 11 SCHELLING,MARTIN W. r 22 12 SCHELLING,MARTIN W. iif_ 13 TUCKER,MARILYN S. ICI 1C 15 14 McGREGOR,THOMAS&JUDITH 18tD — to15 TATE,J.R.&KATHERINE 'I 16 16 TATE,ROBERT&BEVERLY 7: :I .t; 17 TATE,JOHN&SUE ANN — " 17 i 18 McPHERSON,ROBERT LEE 2-1 .1: 19 DOVE CHAPEL JOINT VENTURE t8 1; TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION — A 7 STANFORD,MELVIN E. 1'' :us S i 18 69 STANFORD,CONSTANCEZ 1H • 18 I. 23 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IG 1 24 BRAZOS ELECTRIC 182 23 in F- 19 - -- I Oil 1A 1 i 1 „1+1 ! !•iG i_.� 8A-9 \\ I20 '' i City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY 'ase No: ZA 95-73 Review No: Four Date of Review:9/29/95 Project Name: Concept Plan-Solana(Residential P.U.D.) 199.2 acres situated in the W.Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958. the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, the R.D.Price Survey. Abstract No. 1207. and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, and includes all of Lot 4.Block A.MTP- IBM Addition No.! as recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68. P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G. Slide 208, P.R.D.C.T. APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Maguire Thomas Partners Bury&Pittman D.F.W.. Inc. Nine Village Circle. Suite 500 5310 Harvest Hill Drive. Suite 100 Westlake. Texas 76262 Dallas. Texas 75230 Phone: (817)430-0303 Phone: (214) 991-0011 Fax : (817)430-8750 Fax : (214) 991-0278 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BOOKLET RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/21/95 AND THE PROJECT CONCEPT PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/25/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. e following changes are needed with regard to the Concept Plan-Figure 7: 1 Correct the acreages shown in the Residential Site Data Summary. The acreages shown total to 199.1 acres. Correct any other figures which might be affected. 2. Show right of way dedication for the future re-alignment of Dove Street. Consult with the City Engineering Staff for alignment. The following changes are needed with regard to the Planned Unit Development Booklet: 3. Product Type 'B' calls for a maximum lot coverage of 50%on not more than 25%of the lots and a maximum lot coverage of 40% on not more than 75% of the lots. Ordinance 480-0, Section 30.5, pertaining to residential PUD's, requires that all buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding 30%of the lot area. 4. Clarify, in the development regulations,whether the intent is to comply with the regulations of the underlying zoning district as currently amended in Zoning Ordinance 480-0 dated September 19, 1989 or as the Zoning Ordinance may be amended at the time of development of each phase. 5. Move the ancillary uses in Section VIII "Development Standards" to a paragraph preceding Product Type "A". Please note that it has been the understanding of City Staff that skating rink and gasoline service station uses were to be excluded. 8A-10 • • City of Southlake,Texas * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 10/09/95. All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9", and include 11"x 17" revised reductions.All changes to be made should be incorporated into the bound documentation if re- submittal in this format is anticipated. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Maguire Thomas Partners C Bury&Pittman D.F.W., Inc. The SWA Group, 2211 N. Lamar, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas 75202, Phone: (214) 954-0016 G:\W PF\REV\95\95-073CP.W PD 8A-11 - . i CI CONCEPT PLAN SOLANA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AUGUST, 1995 E , 171 ""..4. -� �` — -. - - PROPOSED SOLANA TCSOENDAL P.UD. •-ems.:,. ,•Es x:.-MIA •w:a I , .»....1•-.,.J•• �•..,. •.. ...,.... -.., t s-•:•�.c u:c. e•.z'C i ` *.o ...+ 1w+,}LX * J.. RESIDENTIAL N •*i. ' 110.4 crass M4 :M1.0 s + 'M" ,. ` , . e p: P J" I C0 JATION OF PROPOSED NUMBER ,v.•' : ! _♦ OF oKLLSNG um I ± IJ I a . r * cw. .. /( .S* • mown maws e ...a t-� .1 : roTr CROSS AREA , I 1.—_f-�'\ NM ' • ^ .., .Roles[:oLwN .t:a o.u�ti \ r N -' _ \S• r- j.--'� +�q >^x' -\- g i. " ao Liev AC § r: 4 �. _ \ IIi ::ill�2it *'} .ice11 i ...~s •• "% :� `� may : s. a+a } • •1 s.:.:.:•::::::::: �CL`'`i, ,rti RESDE A : L:',1' 1.4- 1-4,411 i i. g's i f----,_ _.,.. ..\== .•i.♦5.�� ���•�i+r.*+::. ..1.,11._..�•C1 . ; :;f .:.e..... M V. : . ..=.i: : :!. •) a .. •L°R7 , • �•�•:i ::t riii N r �° �.`i ! PROPOSED TRESCCNTIAL i_.,r:•' "-- - . PROPOSED SOLANA NON-1REaaoa5Aa • `.'ii:i r'' ";' ,� •; ' C - f r� PAID. :.T•S•.' .. '��- `-- ✓� • x•Oa-_ q •--.`` j `j .a-A[soonw.AtA on.e. •• ,;,1i=••S�'. �ti •� / DOITNG MPf�CS. - `�- " ■ 4,-,.. �j �rJ� CawP+o.C.0 >.s K a. ElOSTNG WO. _.- N1NAa a-t IIXRYNf0 - La AL. •:-- sses: 3i '�... • �' r PROMIED LalA. JEe TORT.MSS IOTA • .»J K. �p}�+.+ \ - \ •s '-- A- •C5 —Pt/MPS ME AfIADRR.YE) •'�1cA ,N• • --,,f -^ N, • : ' kBt.:—'-�, J`•,°•s`.c*• fir; �:+{ 0. • t 1e{' AESDFMIAL r✓f 1 ���,LEGEPO a ';, CON OPEN SPACE TO SE DEDICATED � \. P NDN v --_--•.•��`r 1 J m TT.E Cm a SOUIIMX[ . . R��PP0. }�o�.{s • • ��j6; ; ,tea" `• /,r•• ® COMMON OPEN SPACE TO K WVNIANED �i S %i ' • M 140A OR PA LA. �C rL000 PAR, •„ •\ V� i ^4 i :'C�' • .'c• x• ^� s . t LU.D. LAND USE DESIGNATION 1C l-` * _ %• •�_ • ~ M.O.L MEpUY OE/1511T RESIDENTIAL `_-ys•,•s• LD.R. LOW coon RESIDEMRL } : • �� C.O.E. CORPS OF ENDN[ERS•1NOs. AO ZONING.-AORCIATTRAL i I•y41' ��f� i • r T �:':.�i-•.ex' •P CS ZONIG-CORMMTI•SEACCE !47' • �.l RESIDENTIAL dS e CS ZONING-GENERAL COMMERCIAL ,• • IUD ZONING-PANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT \ 4��\\ \sa�tC rral-r,�Cs.w.• C -" SP7 ZONING-SINGLE EAMIY RESIDENTIAL ;E�-�- - \�.er.�w.p �,,,. POTENTIAL AREAS OF PERMITTED ANCILLARY i:tl ,...- z ¢�• 'i WN-RESIDENTIAL USES C-3 A C-S NOT sa • I A"�.,,e.... LL': _ TO EXCEED A TOTAL OF 19.9 ACRES IN THE s\ a••, ENTIRE RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. f. .. • L�••.. _y`'I,�_: •-�.d. .�� . i s w:..•. • -;' • Tom: . *iI s.,.: • wn - ...a IA.•:a w•mr•,Pro r••••,.r.a.l..v. / .....ivn.waPw.r.r rena •,_ .:_1NES7..._ ."!': ��OE .: ..Iw•a.RYK.R.+ I•1-iaN.a• is w•• •....r w�o.r.o o.1 -a., .�.a.I•.._......__...•.....•.. r n r s i r II A..KM N•a.s ea••o•s wag*Ow••• ,.....n SEP 251995..W.1.. ..{.f.N••. • , __ _ wo LPL I I L ( FIGURE 7 OWNED MTP-MIL PHASE I a•JONI VENOM( APPLICANT. WORK TTIOMAS PARTNERS (NOI([R. WRY a PITTMIIN D.I.W.NC. LAM PLA/fCR. 11E SNA OROUI MNE VSIAGE O11C1[ PRE VISAGE CIRCLE Siq HARVEST TILL DIM 72R N.LAMA 00 liciii SUITE S00 STATE SOO SIAIL 100 SUITE�00 WESTLAKE TOGS UM TEXAS 71212 D ,TTEXAS 75230 OALLAS.TEXAS 75202 YTRL]D-0tOS 121419•44-0316 8A-12 - '� 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ., ORDINANCE NO. 480-179 �, AN ORDINANCE AMEND(be / ING ORDINANCE NO. 480, • : • AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANC OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING PI_ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS F LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING • & �' .� .. 17 #3agF � Sb`j ,7' ,1 :, �� YS E°6 �\ 3 !'' a..4 "poi �3 9 ��^^�� ..A.kYg;'£ ; wg Yg�p+a'r q{'y°',,, P. A' � B t&it� . - bJh%�l R'r' fk % F F,i§ .,£ / &j. d. .w� t - L:Q ® w �SS � # w 'pg �y } w [ .�yr 3q � e� ay�. :.�� �3 � �+: y . g& � ! j' Y93. (y@i£9 p' El ,,"a 7R 34 b/ � 6d t E E &;� , g , �C#'aw F�,� '�`� 1� dl�ta k,�[ ¥ 6� ��.�f E,�3 „ iw i a£ i .,:'.: _ `'z' .s:. 7:: 'may. 3 i' k I ��',IrA i i �`x 3` w ® 6w gy g & t �� �� �o-�4 ���6(. ,;��°ta"p���,G;�`�%N'�`��g� �' `raE m� r 2��E; t �� a � � v r ., €o � ) AC, � 3� 3Ea T°�� 3 F.n ¥��` � lJ�� 33 ii;�,, � 'S$'$' � 1 �`�t � - g a` .a- ta .. s m ^.ems � _, 4 _, ` ' AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY ��; 4DESCRIBED IN..) N EXHIBIT "A" , € . � -,.,t4 A giiiE L SL9 't)t',w " F § L.. +�i )C� 1.'1-2 E � Ai 1 /, . � a g� ��g wl'i wg� � s I i9 w 'P w ( 4' w' (h y r s'qa � yt $lj$�I,V.48 k� ��L� ` ���N. $.8 'a 8u-�� � w�.#$ # §k/ � P ��� '� � /� ',(h., or'''''' ` w: '' Y�(9 �rii"`€} 6,i.' 3 P'3 6 6 3� 6 �.14 s G'°, k 3 . t. g. / ) .- Y � T� ��4 E @ t'� F a REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; �� CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETER.NIINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND ( GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND fi fr AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS IPPOr . IORDINANCE LBE CUMULATIVE OFALL ,' ,y ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; /'/ / PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF, PUB ICAT ON INA ATHEG OFFIS CIAL �NEROVIAPE G FO; `/ 'ROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE• IP ‘1/4 E`i AS = _ - thlake y ac mg under it Charter ado. -• .y the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution an•. Chapter • of the Texas Local Government Code; and, L WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location an• use of w,.. G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.1RD �� Page 1 buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as ', '7;T. t Boa irb under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is G:\ORD\CAS ES\480-179.1 RD Page 2 8A-14 a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested fora change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,arecalled for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a {` 9 acre tract offland situated in the ° « , r 4; ! , F .: ,°„ t1 €! -' ¢ c�a seta° o :! '-,' ' 6 — .�� ! ,t_- --• 3€ 3 S€.4 ;&' - )1 t f'i 'iwiP'11 -�},rSa t tit` t r 7 NtK +.wawa Z is at: ::: a �t a � a ,, . 4 1 .^a a,'-II..i , 3- . b t • �F & gk ...s � �vv.„,.��' `!°� R�.. -3 a 1��#�,� ��€x� e AL:7,-:!_,!,:-_, C S � R�:-�r-5„ �l�l i�Nl� (lbor' 14.;—''':''''' ' ' 'f1') is ° 4 iaa 1e ! - "� a IE , � :£ y• ., and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein,from ' �" k`& i :- cribed i � t ;< ! .. !! . ,,,, 2 y `s ,Y`:® TPA° >_. r.c Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to we lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.1 RD Page 3 8A-15 L to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity.o.of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. (Me G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.I RD Page 4 8A-16 Lie PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of .... 4995. MAYOR ATTEST: L CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.1 RD Page 5 8A-17 Le EXHIBIT "A" BEING a 199.2 acre tract situated in the J. B. Martin Survey, Abstract 1134, the R. D. Price Survey, Abstract 1207, and the U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract 1015, all located in Northern Tarrant County, Texas, and the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1588, located in Southern Denton County, Texas. is tract of land embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to International Business Mach nes Corporation, hereinafter referred to as [.B.M., and recorded.in Volume 9846, Page 2023, Volume 9109, Page 620, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and a portion of that tract of land deeded to MTP-IBM Phase II and III Joint Venture, a partnership, as described in Volume 8995, Page 1260, said Tan-ant County Deed Records, and all of Lot 4, Block A of MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. 1, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tan-ant and Denton Counties, Texas according to the plats thereof recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and Cabinet G, slide 208, Plat Records, Denton County, Texas, as amended by Certificate of Correction of Error filed March 15, 1988, recorded in Volume 2340, Page 486, Deed Records, Denton E AND EXCEPT those facilities described in Partial Release filed February 27,u 1989,Texas;nty, eco d d`in Volume 2537, Page 513, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas, said tract being more paricularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 2 inch iron pipe found at the intersection of the South line of that certain tract of land conveyed to C. R. Revels as recorded in Volume 86, Page 557, said Deed Records, with the Westerly Right-of-Way of White'Chapel Road (50 feet wide); THENCE along the Westerly and Southwesterly Right-of-Way of White Chapel Road the following Lcourses and distances: South 02 degrees 11 minutes 25 seconds East, 107.81 feet to a 112-inch iron rod found; South 26 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, 140.56 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found;. South 38 degrees 45 minutes 03 seconds East, 192.24 feet to a railroad tie fence corner found; South 41 degrees 21 minutes 36 seconds East, 321.22 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found, at the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 381.77 feet, through a central angle of 10 degrees 49 minutes 51 .seconds, having a radius of 2019.60 feet and a long chord of South 39 degrees 59 minutes 04 seconds East, 381.20 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found; South 34 degrees 36 minutes 31 seconds East, 1648.69 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 155.99 feet through a central angle of 99 degrees 18 minutes 20 seconds, a radius of 90.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 13 degrees 36 Leminutes 16 seconds East, 137.18 feet to a point in the South Right-of-Way of Kirkwood Boulevard (131 feet wide); G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.I RD Page 6 8A-18 (Ilot HENCE along said Right-of-Way line as follows:EXHIBIT "A" North 63 degrees 15 minutes 24 seconds East, 32.25 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 602.55 feet through a central angle of 24 degrees 19 minutes 16 seconds, a radius of 1419.50 feet, and a long chord that bears North 75 degrees 25 minutes 02 seconds East, 598.04 feet; North 87 degrees 34 minutes 40 seconds East, 137.89 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found; THENCE North 00 degrees 09 minutes 22 seconds West, 32.25 feet to a point; THENCE leaving the South Right-of-Way line of Kirkwood Boulevard and across the said MTP- IBM tract as follows: • North 89 degrees 50 minutes 38 seconds East, 338.73 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; • Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 479.85 feet through a central angle of 72 degrees 43 minutes 59 seconds, a radius of378.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 36 degrees 31 minutes 21 seconds East, 608.76 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (b.' Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 1482.69 feet through a central angle of 83 degrees 07 minutes 24 seconds, a radius of 1022.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 24 degrees 27 minutes 03 seconds East, 1356.04 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 1097.97 feet through a central angle of 44 degrees 42 minutes 41 seconds, a radius of 1407.00.feet, and a long chord that bears South 43 degrees 39 minutes 24 seconds East, 1070.32 feet to a point of reverse curvature; -Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 467.10 feet through a central angle of 12 degrees 47 minutes 12 seconds, a radius of 2093.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 27 degrees 41 minutes 40 seconds East, 466. 13 feet; South 34 degrees 05 minutes 16 seconds East, 374.83 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 1,071.11 feet through a central angle of 34 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds, a radius of 1778.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 16 degrees 49 minutes 47 seconds East, 1054.98 feet; L G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.IRD Page 7 8A-19 (Dr EXHIBIT "A" South 00 degrees 25 minutes 42 seconds West, 269.27 feet to the North Right-of-Way line of Dove Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 39 minutes 47 seconds West, along said North Right-of-Way of Dove Road, 980.02 feet to a standard Texas Highway Department concrete monument found; THENCE along the aforementioned Northeasterly Right-of-Way of State Highway No. 114 the following courses and distances: North 54 degrees 27 minutes 11 seconds West, 122.86 feet to a standard Texas Highway Department concrete monument found; North 19 degrees 26 minutes 08 seconds West, 859.84 feet to a standard Texasiighway Department concrete monument found at the beginning of a curve to the left; Along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 717.03 feet, through a central angle of 17 degrees 06.minutes 17 seconds, having a radius of 2401.83 feet and a long chord of North 27 degrees 59 minutes 17 seconds West, 714.37 feet, to a standard Texas Highway Department concrete monument found; Cie North 36 degrees 32 minutes 25 seconds West, 1383.96 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped"Carter&Burgess" found in the East line of aforementioned R. P. Estes Subdivision; THENCE leaving said Northeasterly Right-of-Way, North 00 degrees 15 minutes 24 seconds West, along the East line of said R. P. Estes Subdivision, 51.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 127.2 acres, more or less. (le G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.I RD Page 8 8A-20 , . EXHIBIT"B" •. - .- CONCEPT PLAN SOLANA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AUGUST...: 1995 et ..1 (. ..„,..,,,,,. ..... • . . ... , • . .• .„‘‘ .. ....,..,. . .. _ _.._ ..„ ,.. ,:,._.. _ ...„............! .. • . PROPOSED SOLANA RESCENTIAL PIM .,:;.•.' -.„- .;vv,..:N••sp...7r..•••• • :.•••:. ... P' .. S• X.....c,AKA I I ,......,•%,.....•ii . •• ••µ, 1 •••••;-- '-•••.' ••-• ... :,:,..a.::":<. ; .•D• .. -:IL DONC•NO • leg ••• i ii•li 4*.'*3/41 •:. .•*A IM 4 RESCE"AL • :.>;'-'1.. '....0! ''.------............N .06.14,. 4L`14:4I1117.-"....,0 • "....X.V.-=•"•;•":•• .:•.*Si3:::S: % i X ..., i , 0,.....ass MO - .••••C :• ,coupvTNo.mr..40,3,4•0 or mimeo,,..,,....,,........0,e.7... ,8: ,, iiiid.,„:„.. ...e.. 0mm••••••••••••••••••••• ..,........i..,:e.::.:::. I I •ar•••••••••me imams••no -.,..,...:, —,... +.4I,orsoi 0 3...f M. ••••••-.L•••••L •• . .....-.AA. I. Pormove.*mum,ems up•a• L:0 IM. .:`• i „........./..,:,..... OR 1,;;*%;, .;:;:i: YA ..L: ...ow. •••• , • ,0•4 G.2.5°:'CA 'MT:.,,,,, MO•CSE:DL•SrP• -2.2 OL.A•C \ . t'af'0101 --,di '••,.........2 e r---r-i---- ,-."--ko.:;---,o. ._,....., - - .-.rm. so 0,ooto.oco- 4!.•. C'eo...._t , . . 1Niii::iAt .-1:•••• \ : •...',.. PI ,.,1--.e•L.:-,.%*:-..:. -"'. , \ ... -°L.g..g*- _4.FT.'4.'r_rlfr''4'ir ...". a -k •:•:•:.:.:•:"." '..- .'•'••.... s.. \ .X4' X ; •::::::::::,.* '' ".4 , ••••••.••••• • '•:;,.....%%,...k......-..t+.17; rtiT,IrLff",i,-t• .. J. ,-A g...••••••• • *see ;-,r,,,T. ‘, . , - , \• \N.,. 4ii::::---... :.,-tti--,-.4-=',-, .11::::::...02 ./...If es,,c +, 1 is , 7.I:;.i..,:i*•;:;:?, \ S -001136,...1::::::::::::1\ • \. \ NW's 22:222•..2"....m.. :..• r'idW1 ..., .•&,.I.......,\,.,*.:. c1•l•,*c4A0,..I1.. :.•,Vi•..•:i:•.••••.•.::-•...•„•."•:'7":..:•.:.•:.e•,f.:.....-.•-:..•:.::...::p=::...::..I:i:::..•::-4:.:F:..•:::.=1=:3::.*..3:=.*=E.•.--•.:•:R:=.L-:•I:.:•.••.:N:•..:.•::.:--:.::••::::-:;::•.:::•::.:,1,' S‘•'•\•1•/1 I .„ /•.1!1 .•a 4 Rt•ENSl•.O•E4•M.rN.C.•si•sA/...L T M•1..",Ii.6.,•c_4e 4 00I•.l. ,•..' -_•_--. c ,-',1::1,.c-:11,•-,:-:- ,*... ,...t.,1. ..- - ' .f -.--. --- • i _ 45I . S. e 4 .-C ; .4 . , - 1.34.: ••• .: =2 ' L - - i — , -..„/ei , • . -el •"2"..-1;.:,.....41111,1V • . \ -. ....':• R P PROOSED ESDENTTAL .,;g C.". • f--,: ._--4-- '. — %vs, .__ _ . . • • """ 4' •-• , . .: _>-- , PROPOSED!NANA 140NRESODITTAL „e P.UD. ' ' .\`'." . --i-- ...-C---• s sao._ ., . ..LIZ- ' . A\:::.:::=......,....”.: 'elf '<4•1-- "" •-...?..."--1, COSTING 7024NCX C3Wl.10 46 . . ir--Ij EX1STNG LU.D..-60.="1,3C . .., . . i„. : ,---F, ,aom.23.41C OCIPCMCC - LC•C. . .••••••\:ME441".•:' 1j31-.S. ...:s, , PRCeOSED LOD.1.MIXED LISe -- N. L TOM.CROL3 MEA . •27.1.C. 4..--- ' \,‘.,. ' • DAL mAAS MC M4.11020.114113 efe. #,* • \ -..r ••.." •C..4 ••• • f - *%47"..4k4--a,. , .s.771:.:::.,.. s. tY.. \to\ : ei• . SOENTIAL ' - i k \ T • 1'• S ' • \-. a ------; ........ -.. ,i• •• "at., e \ ' • •-.—.19- _ ... '• ,••:•4. lk 112 :'- '6 • .---- ,.--•- r'-'-------'-----' • ..',' f ii \-1.41141.11. ; i ,f4 1 e•....P. LEGEND ..5 ''. .• ------- I.4.....* i---,-,—CCARACIN OPEN SPACE TO OE OEOCATED Cs; r 2KIN. TO THE cny Cf SOUTNAKE l•• ‘ ,...:,4.2 i .,., li=li CONAN c.c.SPACE TO BE MAINTAINED % -5 4196‘. • ''' '\ 1 ,..* . .0.-, BY NON OR PALA F74 . ( ......, II*. •.. • I i 1•--• *, .....P.Ft000 PLAIN ."' .... • % ./ , LLI.D. TANI USE CESIGNATION M S _. . .'• SOK% •••1....." '-'ss .....-.. i . . ..• MAR. ICOSA1 DENSITY RESCENTIN. ..1•• / . t • LDS. LOW DENSITY RESIOENTIN. ...C.1- .. \ / : ; • 1. . , : . I .'-'7'4'...Tr'."--....r i ....e° COE. CORPS or DANCERS&PK 'PAP ,t:•./ .. \ • • I I es.;.. AG ZONING.-ACRCULTURAL e..- . , CS ZONING.•COIAVUNITT SERVICE 11 . RESIDENTIAL co ZONING-GENERAL CNA/ERG& /:'' s . IUD ZONING-PLANNED UNIT NV(1..001.104 .t 1..___....?--i NI ZONING-SINGIX FAINT RESIDENTIAL 1 . i I .....-,..,< Ir7.2.. `;..•7. eo pow.AREAS or PERMITTED ANEALAR• .....,..N, ... * gT"(E-.7,r,DAaroLTArC01%I 14Rg:31/4( %)••• '2..„‘\ , <-••c.... ENTIRE R(510ENTIAL P.U.D. "••"'11-77:-, ._. -4.- '-,-' ‘ , . , - . „, „,..- 4/,....X., ••••t•......•••••- •*,-.—- .."--. ...-..41•P' IX 9 • .. .....• ..... 4 . ,....................4 ii/44•1•03.402•4•104 •.''...-----1?Thilter'-- -Z.•4 '--'.--''. ;''• ...V•• •• . 414•MOM/•••,:r.eV..nies 082.4.:iir •2 ,a /.•2•0/44 4.04042•Or I./•••4•10•10 44440 VW' 11041.14.445. 3 MIX/0•••••[Mt•0114 141 4•04•••••••••••••VW/4 firrir i i r 3 OM 111 MAC•••/In 3,44./P••••••/MK I •MAIO 0/140C•••••Ole.•••••I0 Nosta1/4 iber•••••1141.14.444 SEP 2 5 1995 •CM//M....04 4.4 44•24 1.02 41.44 .' ••••••10•11•4[4/4 on 11.11 ILI I 11 L G:LORMASESL480-179.1RD trO FIGURE 7 Page 9 LA Afir WNER/ c43M PHASE 1 I•ANT VTU AENRE LI O MC 1/111ACE CIRCLE SUITE SOO WESTLAKE.TEXAS 71/262 DITT430-0303 ANIXANT/ SNOW(TOMAS PAINTERS WC WAAGE mar SATE 500 WESTLAKE.TEICAS 7S2S2 WM430-0303 INGNEER. WIN I.PITMAN Dr.W.NC. SN3 NARVIEST NU.DRIVE SUITE 100 DALLAS.TEXAS 75230 CON1191-00S1 LAND PLANER TIC SWA GROUP 2211 It NA Wilt 400 DALLAS.TEXAS 7S202 /210914-0016 8A-2 1 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-180,First Reading ZA 95-74,Rezoning and Concept Plan/Solana (Non-residential) REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Non-residential), 127.2 acres situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 1C, 2A, 2A 1, 2A2, 2A5, 2A6, 2A7, and the James B. Martin Survey,Abstract No. 1134, being portions of Tracts 1 aria 1C-- This development proposes separate phases and/or parcels permitting "C-3," O-2, "HC," and"CS" uses with development regulations being the same as the underlying zoning district. The applicant has excluded the following uses: tires, batteries and automobile sales. ,OCATION: Northeast of Northwest Parkway(S.H. 114), South of Kirkwood Boulevard and North and North of West Dove Road. OWNER: MTP-IBM Phase II &III Joint Venture APPLICANT: Maguire Thomas Partners CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District REQUESTED ZONING: "NR-P.U.D."Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District with"C-3" General Commerical District,"0-2"Office District, "HC"Hotel District,and "CS" Community Service District uses. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/Flood Plain NO.NOTICES SENT: Three(3) RESPONSES: No written responses received. Seventy-two(72)written or phoned oppositions to multiple-family housing were received from persons outside of the 200'notification area as of 9/27/95. A list of the respondents is attached to this memo. 8B-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ORDINANCE NO. 480-180, FIRST READING ZA95-74, ZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 2 P &Z ACTION: August 3, 1995;Approved to Table(5-0-1)ZA95-74,Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Non-Residential) until the August 17, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the applicant's request and continue the public hearing. August 17, 1995; Approved to Table (6-0-1) ZA95-74, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Non-Residential) until the September 7, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the applicant's request. September 7, 1995;Approved(4-2-1)ZA95-74, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Non-Residential) subject to Plan Review Suimnaiy"No. 3 dated September 1, 1995 as amended: 1) restricting the potential ancillary uses to approximately 6.7 acres as shown on the amended Concept Plan (being approximately the northern half of the area designated as such),2) restricting the density of the underlying "MF-2" zoning district to 8 units per acre, and 3) using the configuration of the open space as illustrated at the meeting (being the area West of the ridge line,except along Kirkwood Blvd. near the Niire proposed drainage structure). COUNCIL ACTION: September 19, 1995; Approved to Table (5-0) ZA95-74, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Non-Residential) until the October 3, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated September29, 1995. KPG/lms G:\WPFUNEMO\CASES95\95-74ZC.2CC L 8B-2 • Written and Phoned Opposition to ZA95-73 and ZA95-74 (72 total, through 9/27/95) Name Address Phone Nadine Wolf 1360 Cross Timber Drive 488-5373 Rick Borkowski 1201 Cypress Creek Circle 488-1479 Carolyn Bowman 1021 E. Continental Blvd. 481-8363 Deborah Andrup 302 Lakecrest Dr. 251-1641 Joann Johnson 1404 Meadow Lane 488-1415 John Keller 2906 W. Southlake Blvd. Dawn Johnson 1005 Quail Run Road 424-3422 Susan Hampton 421-1488 Janie Hammers 421-0734 Rick& Dawn Davis 1655 Creekside 214-312-3226 Krista Kline 424-0878 Glen Payne 1214 Whispering Lane James & Sandra Christian 4470 Homestead Drive Greg Knudson 491-4921 Carol Norsrip 305 Blanco 329-7420 Deborah Sheffield 424-3309 Glenda Sorrells 481-8309 Keith Larson 500 Ginger Court Thomas Lontley 3464 Southlake Park 488-8617 David Bedell 913 Chimney Hill 421-1417 Mrs. Harold Kruckenberg 1730 Hunter's Creek 488-2192 Kim Faszczuk 911 Chimney Hill 421-8765 Rick Dahlson 424-1066 Alan Mur 481-8492 8B-3 Sherry Pichler 805 Shadow Glen 329-4881 Mr. & Mrs. Tom Longley 3464 Southlake Park 488-8617 Al Parry 105 Brock Drive Sharon Wright 160 Creekway Bend Marilyn Morgan 706 Essex Court 329-1680 Mr. & Mrs. Jack Edson 329-0052 Michail Bruns 300 Preakness Circle Barbara Smoral 1455 Bent Trail 421-2413 Nancy DePue 2810 Rainforest 214-820-4063 Louise Wilson 100 Stonewood Court (written) Angela George 491-0554 Michael O'Brien 3360 Hillside Mark Van Buskirk (written) Carolyn Sifferman 1309 N. Ridge Dwayne Ediger 1307 Houston Court Sharon Carlen 705 Dominion Drive David Ault 3570 Burney lane Caroline Colister 424-0279 Deana Upton 421-6128 Karen Guger 1860 N. Kimball Ave. Cathy Colvin 310 Silverwood Circle Amy Easley 903 Emerald Blvd. Tamara McMillian 1023 Mission Drive Brry & Renee Johnson 1725 Sleepy Hollow Joe & Judy Davis 1650 N. Shady Oaks Wade & Trish Landers 171 Jellico Circle Mary Beth Jamieson 2905 Burney Lane 8B-4 Keith& Kay Zimmerman 1420 Whispering Dell Court Kevin Afflack 1300 White Wing Court T. C. Robbins 1320 N. Ridge Dr. Cass Daniels Martha Washington 488-7263 Joan& Ken Katven 329-7724 Dotty Pittman 424-1631 Elizabeth Hanson 329-3972 Ted Christiansen 504 Timber Lake Anne Dunlap 800 Victoria Bob Furgerson 925 Midland Creek Drive 329-4817 David Johnson 1404 Meadow Lane 488-1415 Robert& Michelle Tusella 409 Shady Lane 214-277-7052 Kent Rudicel 1111 Crocket Court 488-3653 Brodie & Brenda Hardin 701 Shadow Glen 421-3959 Karen Mulder 2921 Flamingo (written) Brett& Kira Griffin 1214 Whispering Lane (written) Diane Johnson 329-4343 Jackie McClain 1372 Woodbrook Lane Marc &Elena Messina 303 Canyon Lake Drive (written) Ralph& Tina Poucher 1032 Diamond Blvd. (written) L 8B-5 Nine Pillage Circle Suite 500 Westlake TX 76262 817 430-0303 L • September 20, 1995 •~ al cy 5e Mr. Gregory D. Last Community Development Director CITY OF SOUTHLAKE E"+ PO4 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Solana Non-Residential Planned Unit Development. —� ZAM95-74 Dear Greg: This letter is in response to staff questions and comments on Review No. Four, dated 9/15/95, relative to the above-referenced. R- �� Question/Comment: Show right-of-waydedication for the o F��t EW F�J� alignment of Dove Street. Consult with the City Engineering future or if f -7)A-reT7 9/29/9 - the proposed alignment. Response: It is our understanding that the design work for the Dove Street re-alignment has not been concluded. We are receptive to dedicating right-of-way for the realignment subject to the right to approve the design of the re-alignment and its location. TH�s �ss�e +-1As Question/Comment: References to the City's Comprehensive Zoning -uea coim-e c-re-17 Ordinance should be changed to reflect Ordinance No. 480. (Page 2 13 , TEE A7Pc_tcAk-r- references Ordinance 489). Response: The mention of Ordinance 489 on page 2 was the result of a typographical error, and we are in agreement that this should be changed. RE F —� Questions/Comment: Ancillary uses should be located in the wont m E..rr 2 paragraph following the permitted uses. geUlEK1 FUE pA-re-p 9/29/95 Response: We agree that the ancillary use language, currently included following "Development Regulations " should follow "Permitted Uses." jrrri ._r SEP 20 1995 8B-6 EJ (ILl f IV Mr. Gregory D. Last September 20, 1995 Page 2 L We have also noted the comment that any revisions should be at the City offices by 9/25/95, as well as the comment as to the acreage in our application for a Residential Planned Unit Development. Sincerely, Tom len WTA/th cc: Tony Canonaco Bob Goodwin -- -"` Richard Kuhlman Ed Walts Ocie Vest Chris Miller • L 8B-7 - • • p \ --9 ' • �._ H• �THROOP •I RE°s D. PRICE .. �� ------ kN..%_-____1.1kr • • n .,c H b ANAH! FEY'' �` Lei r_i p ., • \ :.: ::, ri . rj-74, -.. . --� -;- ------ ------, =:_°E: :: 5S1• RFJS 0. PRICE IT JOSE E.JJHR ' - N. I � W�NYILLS '"i' Y•u • I /"r - w , I \ DAVID DOUTHT "--I•� - •• - .1 __,.•4, OENTON • J. HENRY - !W. HILLS I • 1' TARRANT lilt • I' -\ lb. t- ,,,i. olt A ,� r _ 4011k el" ,.., , .•••. • l C1 0 1 'ffi I N • ,� IOwE'; 01 1' • • �. --' I 4� t'llt REI o . F -. ... ...1 r i. —_, C.NA.THROOP • I I � .. ••. I ~st pt ' - ' 1 , � mow+ 11li. 1 — �� — —..Tom` : VI7 •1 Or . .. `,.. :CREW lipil=,..wiimi. KM �j ^O C u>I°' fir• -L-{ T� nf°R +r I Jf 1 ri .1� P JA" S �''iu 1 W Es1Es I- ... ... •,,, e�- 1.. 1 .... i1 i a ,� to , . I , ' - „.,. '-;1 4"-imm egt-111.03:-. - --.."0-7 "_el.... �Bil� , .�HlRO �tAt�___E__ \ �mo ji-miln::. � .r. 1. p• I MARTIN �-• .C. DART,•�. el11:671141C:c: +•r• Y , -. DEEDY 4 III J. WEST UM r„•' .• r • 1iiLiHdF {i '1'i. // •• gieciusrui ••,-,..,,,4,-,•.r.,- •D•••••""••• •••••• . 0.4.r. \ . 4 ASSALON K. c h7A11.J'1.1 17: ii • E '-- ---------- ----- ---- ---` -- ----- - i`.1 y - � % - •... x. JII 1r .._ G D pt o i �UMaF� ^ , I li, -RKIN H. CHIVERS iiil -- r orr wr - -I - - .:.i.-Z L!F11P^sE 6•k 111V , ,�•��' QO arr wr GB NI 1 , --- .HN CHILD°116SS -- •`I� c ' ` • �f Ii a r�'t.?„-„Mk ' I ••. -,,-..... �. - E5 q .1m -x"'1 n .0UR I JIU)' I s 41,4L"" • YN q mil • '--' --' ChEf11- oN---- r • ---.-- ILL Itsr ' ,. u. .u. •. 1°1 .�j - GR ._ A R. i .. +. H�. {rl�� ��_�BpIG�°�j0n� , �rLL , MEM• p . •. tl .E- i �� THO0.9w+ ca NO+ i I �!• `- IP 1. " ;AY• E"' .-c.:-__•""_ � , r ....�. _111-Pre-; • JO :Er. ,....".. • r''<i.Aa'a rl- i..I ,-,. 9 © .j Ii .:+ r1j . .•. 1 a... -'; - HALL R w.w. N uN• aun OH two E. :1 -. )-. Aq." _M.s%''3. 1.,� ,�.`. p. �� �- - ( �C :.--::. i.;7" -..i..,2:-.r? �! g° .m •! •l am -4- f :•" - .. ...". a . -- -- I ! . • . . 1-.KE -C:.{ - HA.E `j _ • D 1 ..!-•1,i `,.� . -j- ,045E I. . i TRACT MAP rilti.P........:.._;_.._)::-..1 .- t 1 j$ 0ii ,n° 1 " �1Iw li-1- 1 I(I 1,:•£r''61 (1 ef. T -.f 11 1 �) E5, 1E51 8B-8 a1 I ..�ORION I _ fP E� ryI L°°I I t-t. I :-` £l 1 �rN'' '1_......__ I. F le l E.� - _ • '-. ._ - -'Jfhai £5'-D ---t L JL \ , , ADJACENT OWNERS i— Ugh ' (MUM ':� IL-5 i,-i V UV V�/\J U U i ( i — " 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .• . SURVFY A-1607D \ ( 2 / 4 i ; -TiiiiiiiT •\ - L g DENTON 1— r-+1 1.L.t 1,i w.I.Liy Illlllllllllllllii O Y - 1A 7A9. MILLS I 18 SlL� ' TARRANT A-742 _ / SURVEY A-1086 1 '•-1-'�-'i 'y / 015N i -. : 3 2 ...7_... ._ 2A GM. G�GDLI _ DD AMID DD OO MT�IUj . / SURVEY A-1958 IA -- — — 1.1.1 key IA1 2A2 2A7 2A31 SURVEY A-448 •l/` A3 ,,I I 1 /r ( �- 4 P�1BMi —— '- Spin#2 Representative DDN, 1 I Martin Schelling -r( 48 / 4C Og 9J� � 481 4A1 .' 7/ 'Si 'J.p GSA T N , 3A1 3A 4A r SURVEY . 1015 2A5 ? 1< J 16 <3A1A 3A4 H E M D 2A1 J� �I 3A1 3A46 3 S(JRVE A2 iO'Q AAI 3A4A >y 3A3 3E FSJ 3A3A1 a - - (3A3A • 3A2 3C i 301 IL 182,184 78 1 7AIA1 7AMA is 7A2 1A1 • 2 w �/,� (� �1 18 —� SC .1 A 5AIA 18181 J !�ME S o • UVU Py �l U 0UG -( NrORY 4.W. 11 \ U�.UG 1B1B IBM 181A SURVEY A-11 • 5 J A05 1E �YY� i w 1 7A5 182 SURVEY A-11074A 1B1C ;— 481- --, I 1 1C1 IC'— i10 Pc - 8 g ) 1 < : —�48 1 CITY OF WESTLAKE = • RII 19 2A2 2 T1MARRON LAND CORPORATION u S!:' 48fi.182A — — 1E ID 4�8A 1" IE110t i 1 ��_._ 1H 18 IF11J1 182A1 182 IC 1J WEST DOVE ._STRMT Ti / F I 1A I LL89 \ a , City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ,ase No: ZA 95-74 Review No: Five Date of Review: 9/29/95 Project Name: Concept Plan-Solana (Non-Residential P.U.D.) 127.2 acres situated in the U.P. Martin Survey.Abstract No. 1015, and the James B. Martin Survey.Abstract No. 1134 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Maguire Thomas Partners Bury&Pittman D.F.W.. Inc. Nine Village Circle. Suite 500 5310 Harvest Hill Drive. Suite 100 Westlake. Texas 76262 Dallas. Texas 75230 Phone: (817)430-0303 Phone: (214) 991-0011 Fax : (817)430-8750 Fax : (214) 991-0278 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BOOKLET RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/28/95 AND THE PROJECT CONCEPT PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/25/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. The following changes are needed with regard to the Concept Plan-Figure 7: . Show right of way dedication for the future re-alignment of Dove Street. Consult with the City Engineering Staff for the proposed alignment. The following changes are needed with regard to the Planned Unit Development Booklet: 2. ses should be loc 'n the pars o a%ilhh rmitted uses. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 10/09/95. All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9", and include 11"x 17" revised reductions.All changes to be made should be incorporated into the bound documentation if re- submittal in this format is anticipated. * The acreages shown in the Residential Site Data Summary do not add up to 199.2 and should be corrected. Any other calculations which might be affected should also be corrected. * Denotes Informational Comment • cc: Maguire Thomas Partners Bury&Pittman D.F.W., Inc. The SWA Group, 2211 N. Lamar, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas 75202, Phone: (214) 954-0016 G:\WPF\REV\95\95-074CP.WPD 8B-10 • CONCEPT PLAN • C, SOLANA NON—RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS j AUGUST, 1995 , .. . i . may•,... .. /.q' APPROXIMATE COUNTY LINE _ _ _ I .f PROPOSED SOLANA DEMENTIAL PUD. 1 .4 ..'1.0 y /,` .[TIOCN NI.AKA 160 o AC �,x Cosa.MEN INCE(116) 711 AC. ... _ .. ..v.....:....:.........ti..r... I ! SYItOTN NET AIITA = 1t11 K. • 'i.'Mr,;:: nl: 'o-: ::::.`�:a :.a::.: ' I IL0.e.TO K OLDtATEO +69 IC. jrt ''I sei�zL# Tout•IONS MIA 1M.7 AC. w,w°ri 2. 1at y'f/ • •••••••• r, 4u.wa one rPmuin •_ •'39 F • " / COMPUTATION Or PROPOSED NIAGER .r•�y"0 _;�ib j ®T c I 6"po` Cr DWELLING LOOTS C:5: ` .. •i& •- r ` ,.• TOTAL MOSS WA . 1M.7 AC. N. r•. _. .� • ` •A --. .. ! ww•O=WANT .7.16 D.u.AC. N -� Cyr -., ,.`•• 1 .._ s -,.::::_:': .:.-:� -- -- Pwo=ED NM M Maww=. ..w \ n+ ae:I A 0. `1 1^ .t .,- •'.:: mow: :::.. 'ieis:srsssss:«a+iu N:i; i ........xe. •• ,s-'>`s<r<:.\ X.:. .,— ..,. .• °El Tr ni*t4f .:u.i...--4.'_. •-_ 7 . 11 o•�o` e�i trttu+n1c ::s.: :s«:«s / • • .• I1: ...":::: • 1- " ��_ P• • _+ r••.,,/- 7rrx tii, rRtorosEa soLANA NON-IClopITRAL , L ;. • • • aB0•_ • moo.; :�' ° s NON-R3100•66.MU I7.0.C. ' .' Je' Ears OM SPACE Yf AC. • ; '' •wj= r� . • • d '�`1.•\ AQe.TO OE D[wf/u[p . SI AC T�'TS7ST.. / .t P '—��p TOM-CROSS AId 177 t AC. - I •• 1 r\ v+l AATAS AR[.wwolr.m •i;c' _.. j[ • ': ' +.�r °. "�!`L . \tl:w NON-RESIDENTIALNI ' ' r° LEGEND ty r I NON- •r." :2:4.:- COMMOON OPEN SPACE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE cm Of SOUTHWtE `' -\ • NO._ / I,.♦, f�L // gmCOMMON OPEN SPACE TO BE MNNTNNED S/. • '/ �6 BY H.O.A.Pt P 0.A In= i r ji/'., \\ DOSING CS1LA .. • L•9t Dorms LAID use • LZ .I, • ® ROOD PLAN is so wOn= .IO®USE ` # • LU.D. LAND 115E OESIGIMTON C• • EN •• •• • 1� S M.D.R. NEOAw DENSITY RESIDENTAL L.D.R. LON DENSITY RESIDENTIAL y ((/'�\'� �r • ! C.O.L. CORPS Of ENGINEERS SNOT. . , e •� '`1 C�J I • .'�..'.:-, .j AO ZONING-AGRICULTURAL _ t / E Syr• COZONING-C Y SERVICE J C ZONING-GENERA.COMMERCIAL _ �� \ •. J ' 'L MO ZONING-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT \ • : 60• -A' t' Bit ZONING-SINGLE EA ATCY RE4DENTIAL ( • • POTENTIAL AREAS Of PERMITTED ANCKLARY \ t♦, ea w e t•.. ®•' • i• RESI2 NOTt USES RE.Sf-+A SE-,LO•AND .t 11t 0 • L . •: ,e,!• riTR NOT TO E.CEED+7.7 ACRES w THE N �� •• •• • IN,,' ENTIRE NON-RESIDENTIAL P.U.O. • x + srw�••`i.w.w.e M..*e...KMn,+o toe •1 r '-"•"- .- _ _ .iest 1 Nt..Nye.•..Staub. .. .N.,w. e .. ....o:mom .IF.t .e.wN..t..NN...am...a wag. J .` wee.....w IFIGURE 7 OWNER.ER► YR-MI PHASE I I.•JONT VENTURE APPLICANT. MAQRIC SNOWS PARSNOM DOOM IA SURE N PITTAAN D.W.r INC. LAM PLANK% TE MA GAAR NNE MACE CIKtE ME VLLACE CYICIE 5310 NATVEST ELL DISK ITS PA LAMAS ANTE 500 SATE 500 MATE 100 BUTS e00 NESTLARE TEXAS 76167 NESIMKG TEXAS 70262 DALLAS.TEIULS 75550 DAUAS.75(AS 75505 YTwLTO.3303 10171430-0303 • ITNIDSF•00• UMNS4-001111 ' rrn)rPnn rP' . .. . 8B-11 SEP 2 5 1995 . _ . ' U71411114 �/ - / (hs.' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-180 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480 • S AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDIN• 'E OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACT OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY �OF SOUTHLAKE,I TEXA :EINGF ;}< .7 q2_':kc�.RVL b F €i ���t;[i 9 . 4t .1 1g.C} f 1 t (€.Z�f . Rk. U.l A,i 9��— ,�1Y61.^cd@dr 1` w ��.— `md peg 1E @P t a�- k. £' f t,. ' ''' €.s .` . `L;tea.} ... �c'°. ` f Rpp {) ` ,.5 I p�p F i' AND MORE FULLY AND COS 'il�� �1l' �] Y :�1:10�11� ^°°- -z7`. ,..`?.i3 yam. flY m r E r"S` , ,,'L .t EXHIBIT ..A.. �eD` �F ,re3.{1, q_ 1 ����< c ( . p , €fi r . ' . . L I�' ' ' -.�. . ka 1. 1 F µ R pp< . tie _p Cgk bcy•� N-1�eC 'EaC I . ' ' � I� � 1p 6 1 € �� �yh 1 LFY@'P E SGL.p 3 f ,}^ '4'µ,` C � '\ '� SUBJECT TO THE ' '� • I '�'MENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; COR►4 CTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; Le PRESERVING AL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING • ORDINANCE;DE. RMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND f NERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES • AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS t ' INANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINAN S; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVID FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVID P G A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLI ATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PROV ,DING WHEREAS the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the ele torate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Lo'al Government Code; and, WHERE• S, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and Cie WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as ` ' ' ? C:\ORD\CASES\480-I S0.I RD Page 1 8B-12 Qt under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street patiking^facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, (hireWHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, C:\ORD\CASES\480-180.1 RD Page 2 8B-13 Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a y acre tract of land situated in the .' a ;ht. 07, I@ 6Ela: t �.@ C 7F074,-�igg s9 '� ` R C e. a 6 1 ° 16! R !9 6 & 1 and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and incorporated - herein,from 1r ti)sitk 0, c11 � � �' !��� ��C1� 1i1� 6pI q ¢11 a� � 1,€ � I�l�atr 0 Ic c l� , ell ; 1 ° e �1f) � l *-1(cli ';4:4 ' C 4� 1 �-`4),7 a � as er eE ! ! le 1 ��61 1 r G !es 6 f 6 o e sf.,a,' a / 6"e r 11�.• 1 - / a °� '� 1 6 e()co,� 1' E bit: ®., Section 2. That the CityManager is herebydirected to correct the Official g O ial Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. (hre Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of C:\ORD\CASES\480-180.1 RD Page 3 8B-14 Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expresslyrsave& s to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the Le proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: (hoe CITY SECRETARY G:\ORD\CASES\480d 80.I RD Page 4 8B-15 (or PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY - - APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G:\OR D\CAS ES\480-180.I RD Page 5 8B-16 ZONING LAND DESCRIPTION L, PROPOSED SOLANA NON-RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. (WEST HALF) EXHIBIT "A" • BEING a 127.2 acre tract situated in the J. B. Martin Survey, Abstract l 134, the U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract 1015, and the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1958, all located in Northern Tarrant County, Texas, and the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1588, located in Southern Denton County, Texas. This tract of land embraces those tracts described in a deed conveyed to MTP-IBM Phase II and III Joint Venture, a partnership, as described in Volume 8995, Page 1260, said Tarrant County Deed Records, and all of said 127.2 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: • BEGINNING at a 3/4-inch iron pipe found for the Northeast corner of the R. P. Estates Subdivision as recorded in Volume 1957, Page 324, said Deed Records, the same being the Northeast comer of a tract of land conveyed to Ben O. Parks and T. C. Massey as recorded in Volume 5523, Page 786, said Deed Records; THENCE North 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds West, along the North line of said R. P. Estates Subdivision 37.68 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found • in the Northeasterly Right-of-Way of State Highway No. 114 (220 feet wide); LTHENCE along said Right-of-Way as follows: North 36 degrees 32 minutes 25 seconds West, 227.75 feet to a Texas Highway Department concrete monument, found; North 53 degrees 27 minutes 34 seconds East, 6.00 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found.; North 36 degrees 32 minutes 25 seconds West, 460.22 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found; North 32 degrees 32 minutes 25 seconds West, 132.10 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found; North 18 degrees 59 minutes 38 seconds West, 115.37 feet to a 5/8inch iron rod found; North 32 degrees 06 minutes 29 seconds West, 430.57 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found; North 29 degrees 36 minutes 27 seconds West, 232.63 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found, the beginning of a curve to the left; Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 163.28 feet through a central angle of 06 degrees ' ! 26 minutes 28 seconds, a radius of 1452.40 feet, and a long chord.that bears North 32 degrees ' 49 minutes 41 seconds West, 163.19 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; (hase. • G:\ORD\CAS ES\4 80-I80.I RD Page 6 8B-17 • EXHIBIT "A" South 34 degrees 53 minutes 18 seconds East, 374.48 feet to a 5/8-inch ir on rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found; South 24 degrees 15 minutes 34 seconds East, 169.05 feet to a concrete monument found for the Northeast corner of Stanford Place Addition as recorded in plat Volume 388-128, Page 79, said County Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE leaving said Southwesterly Right-of-Way, South 89 degrees 14 minutes 52 seconds West, along North line of said Stanford Place Addition, 1066.53 feet to a concrete monument found for the Northwest corner of said Stanford Place Addition; • THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 12 seconds West, along the West line of said Stanford Place • Addition, 706.40 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for the Southwest corner of same, also being the Northwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Harry Boyer as recorded in Volume 3685, Page 498, said Deed Records; THENCE North 89 degrees 58 minutes 39 seconds East, along a common line between said Stanford Place Addition'and the said Boyer tract, passing at 1077.40 feet a concrete monument found in the West line of said White Chapel Road in all 1101.30 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found in White Chapel Road; THENCE South 01 degrees 28 minutes 12 seconds West along the East line of said Boyer tract, L235.06 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found; THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 26 seconds West, along the South line of said Boyer tract, 23.90 feet to a concrete monument found being in the Westerly line of said White Chapel Road; •• THENCE South 01 degree 23 minutes 22 seconds West, along the said Westerly Right-of-Way of White Chapel Road, 376.88 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found; THENCE South 89 degrees 40 minutes 50 seconds East, 25.73 feet to a P/K nail with a shiner found in said White Chapel Road; THENCE South 01 degree 27 minutes 10 seconds West, 275.63 feet to a P/K nail with a shiner found; THENCE North 89 degrees 08 minutes 46 seconds West, 25.77 feet to the Westerly line of said Right-of-Way from which a 3/4-inch iron rod found bears North 48 degrees 55 minutes 56 seconds West, 0.43 feet; THENCE South 01 degree 27 minutes 46 seconds West, along said Westerly Right-of-Way line, , 48.80 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for the Northeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 7354, Page 934, said Deed Records;(we G:\ORD\CASES\480-180.1RD Page 7 8B-18 EXHIBIT"A" THENCE North 89 degrees 07 minutes 34 seconds West, along North line of said City of Southlake tract, 220.27 feet to a point in the Fast line of a tract of land conveyed to IBM as recorded in Volume 8829, Page 493, said Deed Records from which a 2-inch iron pipe found bears South 89 degrees 07 minutes 34 seconds East, 0.55 feet; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 50 seconds West, along West line of said City of Southlake tract, and the East line of a tract of land conveyed to IBM Corporation as recorded in Volume 8829, Page 493, said County Records, passing at 302.15 feet the Southwest corner of the said City of Southlake tract also the North Right-of-Way line of Dove Road (a 50 foot wide right-of-way) in all 326.79 feet to a point in the centerline of said Dove Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 08 minutes 45 seconds West, along said centerline of Dove Road, 291.43 feet to a point; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 50 seconds East, leaving said centerline of Dove Road, 25.00 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" found in the aforementioned North Right-of-Way line of Dove Road, the same being the SoutheaS,t cattier of a tract of land conveyed to IBM as recorded in Volume 8829, Page 487, said County Records; THENCE North 89 degrees 08 minutes 45 seconds West, along said North Right-of-Way line of Dove Road, 288.50 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found, being the Southeast corner of the said IBM Corporation tract, the same being in the East line of a tract of land conveyed to IBM Corporation as recorded in deed Volume 8764, Page 1260, said County Records; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 50 seconds West, leaving said North Right-of-Way line of said Dove Road, 25.00 feet to a point in the centerline of said Dove Road, the same being the Southeast corner of said IBM Corporation tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 08 minutes 45 seconds West, along said centerline of Dove Road and the South line of the said IBM tract, 249.98 feet to a point in said centerline the same being the i Southeast corner of said IBM Corporation tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 50 seconds East, leaving said centerline of Dove Road and l along the West line of said IBM Corporation tract 25.00 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found, in the North line of said Dove Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 39 minutes 47 seconds West, along said North Right-of-Way of Dove Road, 141.30 feet; THENCE•leaving the North Right-of-Way line of Dove Road and across the said MTP-IBM tracts as follows: North 00 degrees 25 minutes 42 seconds East, 269.27 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; G:\ORD\CASES1480.I80.I RD Page 8 8B-19 EXHIBIT "A" Cie Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 1,071.10 feet, through a central angle of 34 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds, a radius of 1778.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 16 degrees 49 minutes 47 seconds West, 1054.98 feet; North 34 degrees 05 minutes 16 seconds West, 374.83 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 467.09 feet through a central angle of 12 degrees 47 minutes 12 seconds, a radius of 2093.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 27 degrees 41 minutes 40 seconds West, 466.13 feet to the point of reverse curvature; Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 1,097.97 feet through a central angle of 44 degrees 42 minutes 41 seconds, a radius of 1407.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 43 degrees 39 minutes 24 seconds West, 1070.32 feet to a point of reverse curvature Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 1,482.69 feet through a central angle of 83 degrees 07 minutes 24 seconds, a radius of 1022.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 24 degrees 27 minutes 03 seconds West, 1356.04 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 479.85 feet through a central angle of 72 degrees 43 minutes 59 seconds, a radius of 378.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 36 degrees 31 minutes 21 seconds West, 608.76 feet; South 89 degrees 50 minutes 38 seconds West, 338.73 feet to the Right-of-Way line of Kirkwood Boulevard; THENCE along the Right-of-Way line of Kirkwood Boulevard as follows: North 00 degrees 09 minutes 22 seconds West, 99.28 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; • Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 12.78 feet through a central angle of 73 degrees 12 minutes 27 seconds, a radius of 10.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 39 1 degrees 01 minute 39 seconds West, 11.93 feet to the East Right-of-Way line of East T. W. King Road; THENCE along said East Right-of-Way line of T. W. King Road as follows: North 02 degrees 25 minutes 20 seconds West, 95.63 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 167.60 feet through a central angle of 15 degrees 44 minutes 31 seconds, a radius of 610.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 10 degrees 17 minutes (I:5 seconds West, 167.07 feet; G:\ORD\CASES\480-t 80.I RD Page 9 8B-20 EXHIBIT"A" (lise North 18 degrees 09 minutes 51 seconds West, 3.34 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 450.50 feet through a central angle of 54 degrees 27 minutes 17 seconds, a radius of 474.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 45 degrees 23 minutes 30 seconds West, 433.73 feet; North 72 degrees 37 minutes 08 seconds West, 404.43 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 389.73 feet through a central angle of 55 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, a radius of406.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 45 degrees.07 minutes 08 seconds West, 374.94 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 220.36 feet through a central angle of 08 degrees 58 minutes 48 seconds, a radius of 1406.00 feet, and a long chord thatbears..lorth 13 degrees 07 minutes 44 seconds West, 220.13 feet; THENCE North 88 degrees 17 minutes 12 seconds East, leaving said Right-of-Way 80.85 feet to ! a 5/8-inch iron rod found; THENCE South 00 degrees 12 minutes 32 seconds West, 220.18 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found; (hbv, ; - FHENCE South 31 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds East, 50.00 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found; THENCE South 63 degrees 57 minutes 48 seconds East, 359.25 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found; i THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes 28 seconds East, 79.66 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod in the West line of A. F. Olen tract, as described by deed Volume 4823, Page 575, said Deed Records; THENCE South 00 degrees 12 minutes 32 seconds West, along the West line of said Olen tract, 1 43.43 feet to a fence corner found for the Southwest corner of said Olen tract; i THENCE North 89 degrees 42 minutes 23 seconds East, along the South line of said Olen tract, 479.25 feet to a Corps of Engineers concrete monument found for the Southeast corner of said Olen 1 tract, same being the Southwest corner of said C. R. Revels tract; i THENCE along the Southerly line of said C. R. Revels tract the following courses and distances: I 1 North 89 degrees 50 minutes 38 seconds East, 660.05 feet to a Corps of Engineers concrete monument found; • North 89 degrees 33 minutes 04 seconds East, 1132.28 feet to a 3/4-inch pipe found; (be South 01 degree 09 minutes 16 seconds East, 651.54 feet to a 3/4-inch iron rod found; l G:1ORD\CAS ES1480-180.1 R D Page 10 8B-21 1 EXHIBIT "A" North 89 degrees 56 minutes 04 seconds East, 333.16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Cy, CONTAINING 199.2 acres of land, more or less; (we • Co, G:\ORD\CASFS\480-180.I RD Page 11 8B-22 J CONCEPT PLAN L SOLANA NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS AUGUST, 199S �"' EXHIBIT "B" • .l~ss-"-_ • _ _ _ _ APPRO....1(COUNT,.101E - 1 - - �f IPMOroim SOLANA 1ICSDOIIIAL IUD. • `: ."= •lir. ..w ., ... .L,..r.n ..• i COr,O+O Y.C[OMTt t K. rM K.r:`{{ �y'j'.I'� '<::e•s.�rr. �'• ESS ) ' AAN.N1«003CMCD • MO IC. II "L.�al.1 IN S •G y 3 WOW MOSS PICA • 1M1 IC. J .: • COLVUTA10N OF►awest:0 1ASATEA •I - �„.1 ••' r I d � Or OYRUl1G UNITS % J CtiT1 r ewe • :i��/'T nrorosce«o.a a.ua.cs. a. qi. �• • a •� y": ;: SEc:: - 4•M•1i:1Y G�• Ts*T'y •l • i • ':\y4y�'X'• f/ • • •.«.».....•...... 1 ram-.•• /'`,i �I ., a t�nllrir r rrnaut •. /'=rT= �- i raoroseo msocraw 1 '.'•IiiiiiiilrNiiriii i e, • •J L, rloPoieo sa f��D+oM-rnooEnu i•r.� Y{ , ems ' e � . • c i c's .t .. wr-.csaon.a..0 -• PO.c ...« ``YY eo �• y�a: AO...q K 00ACNW Sf K �- •• •1 / • Ya Ms SLOSS ILLA .1T T•C ` ` -, • :�. Ra .M / .r ' : iIONNIESOENiIAL ,� ,� • %. E A11 LEGENDf * =WON OPEN SPACE TO BE OEO.G.1E0 rillePskPrI, .? I L . :._..•......._. I ._..:. TO THE C/11'0.SOUT.RA.E �. rA NO. �` •/ 4 • �G O • .�. ..«.. CORM.OPEN 5►,{E r0 BE NYwr.•gD • / u.. F K 11.OA M►YA. f]OSTlIG CSf{A '•• -• 1 4.. FAp� tr omTING lLD tESE Pq • ? ` .r /Loop RAN 0.9r•••• .?IMPOSED e us=use 1 f LU.O LAND USE OE5ICNAT.r/ • p ••• 4`�:: 11.0.0. f1E00AI OENSOT 0ESOEN1.1. 3,4. f' \ • • COJL CO.SEN51M1 KS.00ST.9 ",1E• ( I •j • �.A i �.��f GOL CORPS U1CCISTU &1DT. "� C 1 AG 20.106-AGRIC1ATURAI dly !� , • ' `�•`•Te"- I y i• CS ZONING-COYYUNirr SEI.PCE if. • T . CS ZONAL-GENERA&COYYEMCYL ! a •.\ . / • a PUG ZONNG-PEANKO UNAT OESE0OP..EN1 ✓ - • --S'� eft ZOII1f-SINGLE rm.,1KSOEN.1. • • S. -RESIOENTIAL N.•�e •! r POIENMI ARIAS Or►ERY1rtE0 A.ICtLL RV t I .c f r •®0 • • A,. MESIOooY1 INES RE.sC-1.L Sf-30.A.10 t Q • Co. 1f.1 110T TO EACEEM 12.7 ACRES N THE f!l\� ��••• • '\t 3 •• '�r ENTIRE NON-11ESDENiY1 P.UA. 0. % l - •�•---i I:_ •• •• ••1 • 41 4ITJ` w t"',.•..i.........a P 7a INNS•„. t'-` \,A .�..-..-..-.. y �Y+2'• T{t" I L MIL N..u.r••a....er•..44..M. ec •w••rtr.•.•.......t•..... • aa" -.4 — co, FIGURE 7 0MSC14 II1Pr011?VASE I i•MITT vEMIVK AP?UCAN'T. f/AGUIE 1N0WLS PAMPERS DICtQI1 SUIT&ITTiwW Olw,SC. WO ILAEf.EN TIC MA GROUP MC VISAGE CAGE ME VILLAGE OA L WO HARVEST NU.OIM MN N 1AMAI MT(SOO wilt S00 KM 00 SUN 400 MOT5AAC TOGS 74141 ME3ILAU0G TOGS 75351 OAUAS.TOGS 73150 DALLAS.TOMS 75102 140143O-0303 5NM30.0303 01yN-000 0141104_00IS r'ia-rfli flf27N G:\ORD\CASES\4807180.1RD Page 12 ilufi SEP 2 51995 / 8B-23 l - LI_U_11; City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-182,First Reading ZA 95-83 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Meadow Ridge Estates REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Meadow Ridge Estates, 37.416 acres of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 529,Tracts 1, 1A, 1C, 1Dand3A The development proposes sixty-two (62) single family residential lots. LOCATION: West side of S. Kimball Ave., adjacent to and East of Woodland Heights Addition, and approximately 900 feet South of East Southlake Blvd. OWNERS: Mike& Ginger Jacobs, Dwaine Petty, and E.R.O. Development Company • PLICANT: Briscoe Clark Company CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Twenty-one (21) RESPONSES: Fifteen(15)responses received within the 200 feet notification area: • Howard E. Carr Jr., 311 S. Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed,they should have a minimum of one acre lots and Kimball Ave. is to narrow for the increased traffic. • Janice Miller, 165 S. Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed, "Houses should be put on one acre in order to be comparable with other homes in immediate vicinity." • Dennis Minder, 223 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, (letter received 09-05-95)opposed: 1) "Lots are too small,area should be 1 acre zoning or at the worst 1 acre (hair lots abutting Woodland Heights then 3/4 acre then 1/2 acre closer to Kimball. 8C-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK (iime3RDINANCE NO. 480-182, FIRST READING ZA95-83, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 2 2) Poor design, will look like a cookie cut neighborhood. Ordinance requires offset streets to offer some character, 3) The density requested will cause water run off problems for the properties in Woodland Heights as the middle of the subdivision water runs south. 4) Would like to see residential but in a less dense form." • George Thayer, 217 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed, would like larger lot sizes compatible with the neighboring lots and is concerned with the drainage from the development onto his property. (letter received 09-07-95) • Larry Faughn, 215 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed (see attached letter received 09-05-95) • Michael Schroetke, 211 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed(see attached letter received 09-05-95) • Carlos Dorris, 213 Eastwood Drive, Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed, property is platted less than one acre lots which is not compatible with 3/4 be acre lots of Woodland Heights and there is a major drainage problem to the northeast corner of the proposed development. However, he would like the property to be zoned residential. (letter received 09-07-95) A464 ,. Fri- W p�� � -� � 1 Cte1 8 E ,�.�- « ..,T�'r „-_; . ilitO ice. s afi� s ' eE �e �= €a � e e ® i�t o a'' • Darrell G. Faglie, 505 S. Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I believe that 'SF-20A' is appropriate zoning for this piece of property." (letter received 09-07-95) • Gary A. Fox, 4302 Heritage Avenue, Grapevine, Texas 76051, in favor (letter received 09-07-95) • Teresa Jane Thompson, 510 Azalea Drive, Grapevine, Texas 76051, in favor(letter received 09-07-95) • Jerry and Mary Forbus, 595 S Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, if the developer would do the following: provide a green belt between Kimball Avenue and the fence line of residential property, have bigger lots,and build a masonry and iron fence along the property line on Kimball Ave. (letter received 09-07-95) • Gerald Thompson, 1227 Terrace Drive, Grapevine, Texas 76051, in favor, "I think the above zoning is the best use of the land." (letter 8C-2 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK (003RDINANCE NO. 480-182, FIRST READING ZA95-83, REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 3 received 09-07-95) • Jack S. Petty, 616 S. Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, if developer builds a separation wall between this development and his ostrich farm to the south. (letter received 09-07-95) • Sally Ezell, 280 S. Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092, undecided, "Our west view is of Walmart and any future businesses. We want to sell our land for commercial use and are concerned of neighbors' opposition should a development begin just down the street." (letter received 09-05- 95) P&Z ACTION: September 7, 1995;Approved(4-2-1)ZA95-83,Rezoningnnd ebnnept Plan for Meadow Ridge Estates subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated September 1, 1995 with the following requirements: • Minimum one-acre lots shall be required along the western boundary of the property. • One lot shall be deleted from the tier of lots to the East of the one-acre lots on the western boundary, and the difference shall be evenly (ikkar distributed among the remaining lots. • A six-foot(6') screening fence shall be placed by the builders along the west and south boundary line. (by deed restriction) • A six-foot (6') masonry fence (possibly combined with wrought-iron) shall be placed by the developer along the east boundary line. • The minimum living area shall be 2,200 square feet. (by deed restriction) Commissioners Johnson and Potter offered concern over the noncompliance with the Land Use Plan and Commissioner Potter additionally offered concern regarding the impact of the Airport Overlay Zone and the type of screening on the South, adjacent to the ostrich farm. COUNCIL ACTION: September 19, 1995; Approved to Table (5-0) ZA95-83, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Meadow Ridge Estates until the October 3, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated September 29, 1995. A super-majority vote of the City Council will be required to approve this request because the land area in opposition exceeds twenty percent (20%) . KPG/ls 8C-3 IEL: Sep 28 95 11 :01 No .005 P.03 f I (J l 5 /1 September 20, I995 ,� r �-. • V00 iJ . MIS L Ms. Karen P. Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlakc 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,Texas 76092 Re:Zoning Case ZA 95-83,Meadow Ridge Estates Dear Ms. Gandy: After reviewing the changes to the above referenced zoning request agreed to at the Planning and Zoning meeting of September 7, 1995 and meeting with the developers of the proposed project,I would like to change my position and go on record as being in support of this request. Sincerely, (hoe L 8C-4 L-L 6ep L6 9j 11 :00 No .005 P.02 (lare George& Corrine Tuttle 219 Eastwood Drive Southlake, Texas ' f • September 25, 1995 Ms. Karen P. Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas Re: Zoning Case ZA 95-83,Meadow Ridge Estates Dear Ms. Gandy; Corrine and I would like to go on record as approving the new concept plan for Meadow Ridge Estates that reduces the density to 58 lots. We have been assured after meeting with Robcy Clark and James Briscoe that BriscoeClark will work closely with us to solve or substantially control any drainage problem on our adjacent boundary line. Sincerely, J.;,_se 43(4E5 e•Cjutitt eGetrige G. Tuttle CorrineE.Tuttle L 8C-5 I O ... 1 E.Ifsmttr I 1 1 1 1 (6J5I1 1I I \y `�,` v Y � t( 101 ff 111 .. -.- ` R� C ROLL C7 IE 18 I IC IA 20 2f1_2, x ‘ r�+LILCLnIa�$1 :� I I 'R 7E1 '' lJ SCHOOL :'--.,. ,i 5A1\. �--�� 101A ° `��� 2a`T'�d� so2 —�-� 102 M.1� V t�Q - !It: IA IG 2A'', �pL rI�ty 6.n Ac SOIA •• x . '�_I14A _ sole 5o2et'e r'",\ • '•....J�i t IAt NIowl 8.75 Act SO}k /2,--,-,za, w 4 l A_1.JI I t 1AI 1 501A JA B ..� 7 •5..L • r�ICb (�® ENDS }, 1 xte SCI .I C I / re, Icr •-Aol �i .J 5A3AI GH opt !9 �� c/ i�- 5As 5CI81 • 1 —L _, ,Y r� i I i `` 5A/ 5o1 1 1, .F I F ��5 !!A / -, • 5Av1CY A-IOol § V 5918 J ! ll _. _ 2A _ 4A ,1 - 282 L3 an .. m5 x1 ••-. `1� 3 5 SCI S�SOV j' 3A2 w SRO 581tj ii IC a b1 yam' �� CITY H LL x E ►`�--�/ •--• Iwo''--` 295 LA�R� ..,,,: ..p �. ._. a 29 .- _, _ :5� coP tr I A SA ):::) gR T = _ ' _- O- .; 1Nd' ; sew G f 1 2A i- 5828 582A 1 1 rc I ' j--'-" 51 I SBl 193 18 ' 182 t i y NORTH x 1 x' e OZO 6 tiyEST PKWYST 1 i " , 3 Ac IA1 m , >a 1 f,• . 3 k� R OP• . _ _, ��E,D ��. 1 Y • .. — ... ]D'(f.Y 1709) 2A2� Y11W K EAST SO (6 IO. q•- _ vy.bj f••-,DC) , 383 4,_ • c• .0 7A , - 2 29 _ GOg If H 28 ,�. A 70.6 At (�; p J -\\".- 15 • cj.0 is. �:R ��� 1 M - 6 let • 2A2�•'c, sou 15 A{� 22.11 Ae - I J" Z ___ _- 3 2 U 2A2A 2AIA IAI P • J • 2". 2 ' 2ASA 101 _`, ' I Ito, i t _Ii) __-- _ , --8 O ^- , 11E - ci i • _ g �� op S ` JOHN &. F EMM1: :pAKS - 20 AcI saner A-.7r --�-- _ - 1 Jo �. 1 - * [ ` A `` i 39 i Ap IAI 1• 1 ; `�O`� 1101 IA) 20 Acr v� , c 11DSA1 -• Ila/C 11 383 3 •- N.V7. MLA-) 1 5,.wK- A-ep! '641 tJ 0 6 3 Ac 6.15 Ac _46 11Am801 SI. 9A1 A2A 2A 29 2C1 I.5 t 611A (� UN (i °A IA2C 6.f + lbw, 6A1 IAA4 . el lic• 1A2ll// 6e3J 6e I 6e1 111 • TRACT MAP rEEoow 61 Ac 6r1 6c 1<r , Ill Ac 10 •`\ M�<, J 6c 8C-6 s' IA'te' I `;\I1bb�� f111 1�9/�I1 J 2A2 6.Ig�. Ede oJONthLID _ .. (�IAI 1 fAS�`CdT 11r.t.T.. Ikw` .-4 __ _ 1 O 1 \ - -- 1 . c, 0 j \ flNJ 2� � r� U J Cc 2E L_J( 1B1 Q m "B-1" "SF-1" 2 Greenway "AG" "B-1" J. Ezell J. Miller Investments D. Matise vi M. Zembrod "AG" ?A . "SF-1"- : 1 C H. Carr M. Schroetke "SF-1"•i- ..SF-1" • C. Dorris ZL11m:es �.— • -��SF 1" 1D ' f �- � — SF 1 L. Faughn T. Thompson 4 O) "SF-1" I ". VanceNile G. Thompson ..SF-1" c."SF- , A G. Tuttle lei \1\ 3A 1 I C. Johnson J. Logan C"SF-1"V) — -- - - - - - . — . — . —, J. Forbus D. Minder "AG" c---, I J - J. Petty "SF-1" t� �. "SF-1" R. Koonce 3D D. Faglie 3 3B "AG" 1 �, C 6A 6G 4A1 - - �- - - 6H / ! 4A4 , 1 L RV '''' rsiii - , rr I ! 1 . ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING 8C-7 • City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No: ZA 95-83 Review No: Three Date of Review: 9/29/95 Project Name: Concept Plan For SF-20A Zoning,Meadow Ridge Estates.62 Lots.37.416 Acres in the John A. Freeman Survey Abst. #529 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Briscoe Clark Washington& Associates. Inc. 8300 Douglas Avenue, Suite 800 500 Grapevine Hwy., Suite 375 Dallas, Texas 75225 Hurst. Texas 76054 Phone: (214) 706-9190 Phone: (817)485-0707 Fax : (214) 692-0250 Fax : (817) 485-4106 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/22/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE Arr QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. A 35' building setback line is required on both street frontages for a corner lot. The applicant has request a reduction to the standard side yard requirement of 15' (15' B.L.) for "Back to Back" Lots. 2. Ordinance requires street stubs into the north, west and south lines; However, due to the probable office/commercial use to the north, and the existing Residential Use to the west, the most feasible location of a street stub appears to be into the south line of the project. The applicant has provided a street stub into the south line of the project. • 3. Although Concept Plans do not require right of way dedications, South Kimball Avenue will require a right of way dedication which would provide a full 70' of right of way from the existing west line of Meadow Oaks Subdivision as recorded in Volume 388-129, Page 39, P.R.T.C.T. . * If any proposed screening and/or landscaping are to be provided,staff recommends that the applicant designate a common area,net of lot area, for its location. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Briscoe Clark Washington&Associates,Inc. Mike& Ginger Jacobs, 15851 Dallas Parkway, Suite 240, Dallas, Texas, 75248 E.R.O. Development Co., Inc., 1309 E. Grauwyler,Irving, Texas 75061 CDwain Petty, 610 S. Kimball Road, Southlake,Texas 76092 G:\WPRREV\95\95-083CP.WPD 8C-8 i a a f; i I ;: FI. a ..:i j a i E31 01(1 a►,f j •[i is!:,a tat lihf!'All -I! . Ifs •ts< Ii: t 2i�i Ili 1� y y . ta• t' i?� f e; itjit I= i eY�s 5! F 11 1.. t•. W A i N - i•ai {2: ' i► : if I afti ;/f 1— < V 1 W qII - sr51• � 2 ! tiIt . E 12Y1 s i$' Et«3 Z g s''FFI2' r ~ «ll ►le- E . Il 7—= $ c :tiI/ . 2 a o y a o : 3 iE=i(1`!i c`.., a "t 4 4.v N . Ik�jEs ii o ►e c t-, y111• f�iFt clq 1a r #� : i r Y"•';i 1;:; 4 C i i iWrIr t S I 4 tom-• 4 ill • act f(` ill LA :33 ..... : al J T. ...NW MC ITY•w' w.—•••VA. i tag `nlir � . •, . ILi— T _ a VII s8'sa1al I a ; "_ 5:1 .F I `r1 I ' el I ;lit �r -; •-• •- 5'r 1 �t1 1. j� fi is+t f • rQ(1Stlyy�`Q •=>Ss —. _JI 7 1 (aro'.ro. 1 { i LE E6iliFIl = - — — ` .woos _I 1; _..L_' — (9'66t I: 3.9f.9LA6 S ' s •• • :: - .¢ 41.1.P • . . 41'► .pw mp«. ..ems -_ _J ' It.. a .. A••..•••J..«...•pM..•--A... -I. r•--.. y«.•i;I_-f_.-..ter'.-*;g:"".. ..nW'.i,.- 1 4 .• .... .r... € 1 �'. �d''2� ! s. d V. E. a '•v s #. s '.tom: Yr-. . 1 `� L . _ _ I _ l'.'., "T.«'u •'.<i.w p1w-. pv 6W pW /�f�. « ~';.�•• • t•�9 ' -....... _ �- kt —.-a®ar. t __ . — -"-r.;---`=�-` • ••. 114 4 / �� ''i. ' a-•.`5 ;•.1 ..Aa" 4..1.E `:..•- 1. / .- . . -bra t. AM. eaw•, pW '..ir• .,:«. Aa.-.• ..'.r y= w«. •Na� - 7 11111 Yl 2!)E!): trifft /.. • i hik , , . *, .;....' -. .1)-.. * -l' ..... 0..* i---. L .* ------s' -*..' "s :i a-. ` c'a '#'�•• •ae--. i! •,-y,1 . a.F••-t �• .L } !1z. • 2;it • 4.b. }s,...`. n«. `. Y..,—...- _. .------:rr+.ri�T_aa.rraai 4 yr}i}J E •zc} K war ••.. aft•'P. -'SL'l9L•-.. , 6P. O •N T ..ILY9..... M.66.C6A6- A a a a s Q9i� ..a\ _a '• 1:3 I "3 r I `tis Es£ •I = ' 2.. a lit s ///. , 8C-9 • Cr' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-182 / AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 3, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A" #' A 'i - 1. O :,.ri 1) ,S : T TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAIN . . IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICI•. ZONING MAP;, PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIO : OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THA HE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WEL =4' DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDME► S HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANC. HALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PRO DING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR • PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING • SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATI. 1 IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVID ' AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, e City of ou . e, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the ele, orate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas L,cal Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as qun der the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\CASES\480.I 82.l RD Page 1 8C-1 0 Lchanges should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular usz anhe view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, L G:\ORD\CASES\480.182.1 RD Page 2 8C-11 (60, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 37.46 acre tract of land situated in the 4i 4 ` N 59; ct, , "" band°3A and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from to "S 0Smgle..Faimlye idential D Plan 4ttatiredoNe orated ham Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All exystingsections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both Le present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:\ORD\CASES\480-182.I RD Page 3 8C-12 Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. L MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:\ORD\CASES\480-182.1 RD Page 4 8C-13 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: . - CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G:\ORD\CASES\43Q 182.1 RD Page 5 8C-14 liwe EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BEING all that certain tract. parcel, or lot of land located in the JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY. Abstract No. 259. Torront County. Texas. and more particularly described os follows BEGINNING at a 3/8" steel rod found in the west right—of—way line of South Kimball Avenue for the northeast corner of the herein described tract some being the southeast corner of o tract of land conveyed to John R. Ezell and wife Sally N. Ezell in Volume 7651. Page 864. D.R.T.C.T.: THENCE S 0026'46" E. 399.81 feet along soid right—of—way to .a 5/8" steel rod found; THENCE S 0022'12" E. along said right—of—way at 182.69 feet possing o 1/2" st a rod with o plastic cop stomped "MOAK SURV. INC." set. in all 489.67 feet to a 3/8" steel rod found: THENCE S 00'01'05" E. 333.96 feet along.soid right—of—way to a 1/2" steel rod with a plastic cap stomped "MOAK SURV, INC." set for the southeast corner of the herein described tract same being the northeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to Jock Souders Petty in Volume 6364, Poge 431, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE S 8913'21" W. 1319.44 feet to a 1/4" steel rod found in the east line of Woodland Heights Addition as described in Volume 388-212. Page 56. P.R.T.C.T.: THENCE N 00'07'00" W. 463.71 feet along said east line to a 3/8" steel rod found; THENCE N 0022'49" W. olong the aforesaid east line at 190.77 feet passing a 1/2" steel rod with o plastic cap stomped "MOAK SURV, INC." set, in all 781.75 feet to a 1/2" steel rod found some being the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Donald R. Botik in Volume 7791. Page 1717. D.R.T.C.T.: THENCE S 89"58'41" E. 590.18 feet along the south line of said Botik tract to a 5/8" steel rod found some being the southeast corner of the aforesaid Batik tract and the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Don V. Motise in Volume 7609. Poge 419. D.R.T.C.T.: THENCE S 89'41'38" E. 728.90 feet along the south line of said Matise tract to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 37.416 Acres (1,629.863 square feet) of land, more or less. • G:1ORDICAS ES1480-182.I RD Page 6 8 C-15 I fw V _. V? Ili, -' Ij • i ?ai. ' I : l;. !i Eye (kW Ir , ../I I S'; I. . I!I1 '..t. ill} �. [� ?. W as a iY itp'a ?i { slli j?lIZ2 F U F <y p . YA / :I-', i .i. t'3 t {I; .IIt {, 0 3 `ac rxe.- /\ R e t14!- y' ,' i c et L is I E ii{! i I ( t{�! t I1j t 02 yq� � IiIII11 II # � ' 5 No gga raa •�IIII' ?? hi II ! O N ...." .3, 4 VIiia i U U t g r $I1/I1el* li t SI. Uc!Ril IZt11.xI, °1•�:i1 k�� N. et. ,`1IN ii :tZiIll+ .1 IIi. -I{I -it c, a wo .0 •ie NiY Y P . D 4 4 4 (` 3khr i-'. Y l' Y Y Y Y 'Cc L=_' ace L J .a1 In gad fa rn — 1f r' • Y li ill 40-a `: I Eli a ^Y .a4:a ii I - 9 I iti I , E i I Sit? I §E...•�j - si E. 1e �iS4 ' I • iX I .di �.. I f ; I alp( ct 3i — -- --I-.= 1I— — r --?ar•+ 1.V.41�9 N.Iumi _I - .••� ../IL--.:_:I .'� EEE'S�FeE¢ i1 ,t9.66{ .'All 3.9e.9L00 S ,L9'691 _3.Ll,LL00 S ,-'••!!: 96•L{t 3•SQ10.00•S L— W :. ,.. ,.a.l n.r n.M a.w I ! 3 ana^N N.. ..•r a.w.^. 4j1 tt ;a:. .. tee .!it - a. I. z. 3 • •i W .« n t a•',Ike... Asa pw Al. Aw• S �. e7[ )___ •— View r ''- - '- .w = 1 • •--_'__7/a— sr,: - ^ .. A«.,• hW... AM.- Aw -I'-r....- ..,- • A3.. •. 'i- mil' z i d-a E i'it.' ;k•-. •Yy•• .....I._.1t.'^'•i1►.3. # '. °.i;1 ' ..� - !E .. i. i 1 1 ; �1 1- f• a ` • c. G-- " s ',---. —"- -•_.. ,. ...�'-.• . f__.. .=_ t:..Ylr,..-� 4;� Ei1 'T.u aw -AIN , la Aw nw s.t �.`•. • �g • ''c 'YE. .1.." , g_•:�.g...F 2:•: !.?"sf i Pi 1 :�•, o_.',a1' 74 -..• i jtkj k• "'aa11.YY_ .x 4•.. et-�° Rit" - 4 ..e.... -.. - 4 ;•• w' a alY! k`-i.sy w - • ,6• Eli z6r a-�iT•. _ -.tA naf Aw s, � �Mt m.-•'Av �nLYYY...- i C ).;111 (111..111111.9' ..eg . - ,. . i f. -0 § ANw. .... I wv aaF�rr g �e';l L. f r.k c+ tj:•'TT•e. g~, .waw 4`..e. -7i..:. -_—..T>—_---•_'.Tx.T.wT�.w g -Et:i 4 � wv w� ' — _ �.. • 04 r . • *..._w a tee •• Nee. : .,SLi9L'• \IL.6Y.LL00 N( I 1 :lLTSk..--.. M.00,L0.00- . ,•' .. __ a_ a a r. ..a I It: I Slit a _ (hir ?fI \ z 1 ya9 I MS I 6 I >t i_. yr 6 a - Y„5 �S N j-ii CI f 9 � a f ._� O U a N 6 a 8C-16 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-183,First Reading ZA 95-88,Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 3.38 acres situated in the William H. Martin Survey, Abstract 1068, Tracts 2A3 & 2A3A1 LOCATION: West side of the private street, Marantha Way, approxi$iatery 1',200 feet North of Randol Mill Avenue OWNER/APPLICANT: Lawrence L. Post CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District ZEQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District- (This district permits a 1,500 s.f. home.) LAND USE CATEGORY: Low-Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995,Approved(7-0), rezoning of ZA 95-88 to "SF-1B" STAFF COMMENTS: No plat has been submitted for this property; therefore, Staff does not know if the property will be subdivided prior to development. KPG/ls G:\W PF\MEMO\CASES95\95-88Z.1 CC L 8D-1 i" ' • ``_ ) (ROANOKE I).r , 1 4 4 �'�� t� ---!'_____ 4A1 40,,. \✓ % 1 1 1 II i i I I 1 I !/ % 1 �2 0 , QDi •1,:.7SV 1:1 SURVEY A-1068 , .r 10.15 Ac 3 glikli s A< is 2C 12C 2C 2C1 2C5 zc6 3 I .•�12 11 3 � 2A5 2C4 1.4C6 2 2C it r ir1,,;I�:,9;!,, 282 262At ZB 2B ZB r; :'..!1 ll( ‘'I !'' 4i!i ,it L . 2/41 _g 2A n1nitA9 \n/ DUVUV . i i v . V 1• 1 5 SURVEY A—► .i. _-ttl�,}� 1,�1 d� Y tA3 1J ___.....i. __ i 1 1AI 1A6 11 j • �►2 1 �1A1 1A7 �1F tE ._��—� ��_:�. SLEEP owe i `J A i 1 _ i i B 2 7 1G 1B '`_ _. —— _•—• i -- i i WESTLAKE CITY LIMIT . ----- \-------"--•---,r 1E1 1GI 1G5 111 1F KELLER CITY LIMIT _ ., *7iii J0HN CH •17R 1E2 1G2 j i 10• { aef�Er 1 _ 1�- st i I i 1 6070 ►" i i i i 1 [ 60 4 1E L 1C4 I 'y • . ' • 1C 1 j j i i 1 i -.La I i B i 28 t.—-- ... 1_.r•L. cgS Riik eA2A --T—r—r—.. �- T --- -----'F i IA IA2 ! I i 1 �,, 1 " - `' 'i • 1 ' ..! f 1,C; 1 .! Oil- gy„42/0 .. L • l':' RA e !. I: :.inn* i 1 TRACT MAP /! nnnKER rizcti.t ` i6II 1 ! P,• ' i 1 ! 1 .t.SURVEY A-16PI � •6/11 8D-2 1*1*1 1 _._ — V VS. / (ims, / _ _ _ __ / ADJACENT OWNERS 2 A A AND ZONING I , , / , -/ / Spin #12 Representative . R. Strand David Baltimore i 2 C 5 2C „AG„ -....._ • --- ____ . 4 . . 2A5 2C7 2C L ,.AG.. 232 - _ - N r � � z B. Phillips "AG" P_ Pruitt L 2 E -_ „ Z AG � 2313 Town of Westlake -- A O 2Ai` ,•AG.. 1 �.; \_G: Wiggins I „A(j — �A U' U o0 - 5 -5 SURVEY A - 1660 1Ar1A3 1J 4 5C 7 >, i\) ( 1A \ i \- !! 1A1 5A 1A6 p i> .?, 3-- :----4 A 2 1 ' 1A1 1 A 7 1 F 1 E ii' c: i ' 1 1 8D-3 it A ,, ,. (aw, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-183 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 5iaa : 3STR CT 1068, A.0 SO >&. 1 AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ........................................................................................................................................................................ ;.':R :::;..:::. :::: VIE.;': : D STR QINTO:>:!SN :>::>::::: IN `rLE::::::F: Y ......................................................................................................................................................................... R:E ManingTRIC ', SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;" . DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; (ire PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. the City of Sou 1 a' -, exas is . a a - •_ e City acting unde ' s Charter a• • • ed by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and .................... WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as }''<" ..................... stn under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the G:1ORDICASES\480-183.1 RD Page 1 8D-4 L facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREA S,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, Li is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: G:1ORD\CASES480-183.1 RD Page 2 8D-5 Coe Bei ng a '�� tr act acre of land and 'situ ated in the ili0OkRufoZniaii2MA.41ii, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit A attached,hereto,and.incorporated.herein from RAG" AE Itu Dtitr t tc," F lB" OINi € tent al triet. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the Yiealth, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both • present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any • and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, Cr:1ORD\CASES\480-183.1 RD Page 3 8D-6 Le, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of MAYOR (sr ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:\ORD\CASES\480-183.1 RD Page 4 8D-7 (1, PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Co- O:\ORD\CASES\480-183.IRD Page 5 8D_8 EXHIBIT "A" (Imie BEGINNING at an iron, pin found in the occupied West line of said Martin Survey , said point being , . the Northwest corner of a tract described in a deed from Blease Tibbets , Trustee , to Susan Post of record in Volume 6669 , Page 832 , Deed Records , Tarrant County , Texas , said point also being the Southwest corner and POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract ; . THENCE North 368 ..75 feet to an iron pin for corner ; • THENCE N . 88° - 51 ' E . 378 . 67 feet to an iron pin for corner in a gravel road ; THENCE S . 6° - 34 ' E . 370 . 33 feet to an iron pin for corner ; • THENCE S . 88° - 51 ' W . at- 35 . 60 feet passing an iron pin found in the Westerly line of said gravel road and continuing in all 421 .0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 3 . 38 acres , of which 0. 26 acres are in road easement leaving 3 . 12 net acres . • C O:1ORDICASES1480-183.I RD Page6 • 8D-9 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-89,Plat Revision REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision of Lots 1R1 and 1R2, Block A, Commerce Business Park, legally described as an 1.5703 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey,Abstract No.474 and being a revision of Lot 1,Block A, Commerce Business Park as shown on the Plat recorded in Volume 388-2a4,,Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas LOCATION: 225 Commerce Street on the Southeast corner of Southlake Blvd(F.M. 1709) and Commerce Street OWNER: Randy Pack APPLICANT: Landes& Associates Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO.NOTICES SENT: Three (3) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995; Approved (7-0) subject to the Plat Review Summary dated September 15, 1995, amending item #5 to allow a common access easement along the east line of Lot 1R2. (See attached letter from the owner, Randy Pack.) STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is a copy of the first Plat Review Summary dated September 15, yn�/ 1995. KPG/ls \WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-89PR.1 CC 8E-1 L September 21, 1995 Attn: Greg Last City Of Southlake Re: Lot 1R2 Dear Greg: It is my intention to provide a common access easement thruway driveway and parlgng k „qn, 1709 directly east of lot 1R2. Thank you, Randy Pack L rJ r2f!n.n. . SEP 2 11995 L 8E-2 L i `. 148 1 ,1 ,1. I . I. rar 6fIt '_�_ _ { r r l`1`Ititi' T'T'T' S'4C __ - r CO' GE y 28 283 289 285 2810 284 :; 1' 1 1 -1-+ 1 a • 1 20 2c 2C n 2R 2F 2J I 21' 1 S i �, 1 I 1 1 1 , m P ♦ - ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 r 1 r 1 l 1 r ..' 1.1 .11 ..1 ' \ - 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 2K © Ei 2E 20 2R 2M • , , . ,em:.n1 ":c,1, I - KE J 2A l 2A1 140� C ) W = AP :.1-, -._./(_'�� ' it,- �-. 2AlA I C"-- 2A2 183 18 182 , e! �� IOW SURVEY A-158 • DE B A 2E9C 1 ram 2E132E 2E9 V� EtliPjNI 2E12 2E7 Y1 2E3A _ • 2E8 GRp,' E J` l I wsnN vucc i...__ , .E l''sA'}7 ti L -. L A>E,�000 LANE zcs 2 -- i- 1y '. ti >� iftiN VON HIGHWAY , vJ I 1 . 10 . ... • � . .55 N �• I 1 - ' ' ' III 'r1 _. N 1E2 i- T---� 11 1 I :- f I o ;��' siR'.`s- a l r I 1l- Cs 'A� i55 2A3A1 2A2 a,'*..1SCti ` r16AlAi I I i yAi.ug. 2A 2A3 2A2A 2A1A *lip" I Ki1 i ilik, 2A18 381 _..�� j. i ST 2A1 , ——- I-- L�• ��3 302 30 LA 2 �K —�. 1�. 1A� 118 ---- 5• 1N .�9,J• 1. - 11E = ---�--- p 7 gN .' - _- SLAW A-171 1 4. tNK ...1" sA 5 — - P�� s N+ cJ I 1 - RA Y _ G 11D -�.,--. �s, ,1D3 i�'I - - PARK I • I 3- it 1 , e `off = 1101 1 F4 I I8 .I ---- 1 \` 11D4 l I 1 I 1105A1 _- r 3 1 GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT ---I-""1 . 6.Is Ac wousTRIA� su`10 -N. S1NES5 • 8 ) sP�RK 4 Pr* PARK -EN L p0 61 ,E 9 v51R1A 10 • 11T I I;IN AI_.........„, E, ( cDOnMALDD��1 SUP Y A_T°s NE TRACT MAP i 8E-3 14 TR 3 I -AC\ V . \ ,Oy3` 2.9 @ TR 3E 3 @ ADJACENT OWNERS l 2.718 Ac TR 8 (kiwi AND ZONING 1_. io : 328 1 TR 8A .169 Q TR 381 054 @� • J.. • @ 2aI-2 , gLVO Ica%�38 .4 KZF E SOUTHLAKE 2R TR.3A2 , , .634 AC g3C9 766 @ 16 State of Texas r _ .... _ to „1_1 „ 1 I L 1R J. Gregory 3.352 @ A, ti „i_1 " TR.3A "I-1 " 2 B 7.229 @ (110/ J. Stacy R. Pack 5 1 .58 AC • 2 6 1 .6 AC 3 F- cn 7 Z 1.36 AC m .55 5 g 4 3 / 4 8 6 4.26 AC 1.2E 4 5 I 6 ) I 0 6, Spin #7 Representative I I 7 J Peter Sporrer L._ I ` I W 3 .3 It{ 5., 5 I 8 Q 5SN 6 I 8E-4 1 I City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY 'ase No: ZA 95-89 Review No: Two Date of Review:9/29/95 Project Name:Plat Revision-Lots 1R1 & 1R2.Block A. Commerce Business Park.being a revision of Lot 1.Block A,Commerce Business Park. 1.5620 Acres in the T. Easter Survey Abst. #474 OWNER/APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Randy Pack Landes & Associates. Inc. P.O. Box 3049 1107 E. 1st Street Grapevine. Texas 76099-3049 Fort Worth. Texas 76102 Phone: (817)421-8787 Phone: (817) 870-1220 Fax : Fax : (817) 870-1292 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/22/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY Qi7ESTTN§OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Please be aware that the Driveway Ordinance No. 634 requires a minimum 500' between driveway centerlines and/or street intersections along F.M. 1709. A driveway onto F.M. 1709 (Southlake Boulevard)may not be allowed. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a minimum 35' Common Access Easement along the south line of Lot 1R1 from the west line of Lot 1R2 to the east line of Commerce Street. * Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial,they appear to meet the intent of this requirement. * All taxes due must be paid prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Although not required by ordinance,staff would appreciate placing"Case No.ZA 95-89" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * Original signatures and seals will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Landes&Associates, Inc Randy Pack :\WPFIREV\95\95-089PR.WPD 8E-5 �., 0 4 0 sas i 3 i]i 1, , jjl j+` !ils j l !i9 1 111 ; I IiIII. till v 1 i jl� �� . aa� I C: i i . ii i ,,y 0; l atili ii 1 { 1� yE III s l . v i I 1 ,hill ;li�ilj ..!3 Al Ell iII fig ilk i• ' • i l ' 1� 11 I TI a it`` I, ill 1}..! lii 1,1 t! ° 1;,ii f'A 1 I • Ulf 111101{ a {a , 118 lb it ail his 1Ji ii 1 tall 1ii g_, ji ll! J ; 1' iSg ir 11 l ! fall . __ i .1{ti1 la 111 Li s! ,3; iii =.r :ii .1 1 3 B' �• .' i I I ��i '_!dli— 3li - -!i =! _ , it _ i gal i1 7 i g h �I 014 li j - ili;311. till Y31 0 If. s11� °.1 ii i11,ll I !B 1I{( f d A '7 S ',!4 i431 .,f'iI > >- ii; Ea liJJlltt 1I lair/ f� i i=iliili iiI ii sii III iii Iiil a ( I`fit 1 r IAA �g -� �II s a liii! 4 ;jag WI 8 la p• ',kilt I Ri I I I il illIMIIIIilli Hi u ! L. .I :hMiP4ll }Pi IiiI1i ! $ ' ; ; ; i {{tI lit iia411:i1,1 i �--2 8 '1 l.12 1 �! 1it !I 1.3It s1!1 (.... s � sip Ili 41MI iIlisltiri ;ii.ltidi'''1 I'll ! E II til#�l;Eliifili :111 Pit \ � i iit if1/11 II ' \., \ If Ji `1 , i ' 8 o !€!!ME -- 1 . - P is y n IIP z \ 1\i, 31 8 Is Jig a .. spas as • ii: ��l a g I liji 6 `a. \ d IN d i r O : 1 c Ills m...-T.wu I : \ ' In °PD.' 6; \-,\U.- ,.,*..,--.-.I,.L,,,,..,.i„...„ --.. -111 iJ5- -a7F� -. ,.7, ► Ii 3 ..' .. ,. ail, % 1 r_ -•- .. -- I `t „ t,.. , _ , i ,i .M .y, O i.CSY i = E C H 11i,, !€! -$ /BM ; I t 8E-6 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-90, Site Plan/Office Complex REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for an Office Complex, being Lot 6, Hiram Granberry No. 581 Addition, and being further described as 0.908 acres situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581 LOCATION: South side of Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) approximately 80' West of the entrance to Lake Crest Addition -" OWNER/APPLICANT: Dr. Timothy Huckabee CURRENT ZONING: "0-1" Office District (11..,NLAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential O.NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: One(1)written response received within the 200' notification area: • Dan Altena, 103 Springbrook Court, Southlake, Texas 76092-7727, undecided, "We are not sure how the adjacent land will be used. If it will also be 0-1, we request that a fence be included and the appropriate landscaping/space between the office(s)and adjacent homes be required." P&Z ACTION: September 21, 1995; Approved(7-0), subject to the Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated September 15, 1995,deleting item#11 (side yard setback on the West required by the corridor overlay zone)and item#14(interior landscape in the parking island required by the corridor overlay zone)and working with staff to determine the best location of the common access easement shown in the northwest corner. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the comments of Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of those items addressed in Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated September 29, 1995. Although the applicant began the development process prior to the adoption gA of the Corridor Study, he has previously stated that it is his intention to comply with the corridor overlay zone requirements. KPG/ls 8F-1 1 in ` co.,aw4 i i 1 i i i :1•fY9■iqf=.: -L •�a':L',r 28 1 1 1 C j •. 41 2CIC1 ` JJ I„I.i'‘.1 O I ` nJ.-1 L.r.1 L1-1 • . . 1 , 0 yq;,,_....r� -/'_ ="vI y a71:,q�.• . .Y ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 , ! I tii.KI . I 7 1 1 1 / , pp' I. Mi.• f M ` ' 1 ..1,.. " ` 11A 9F 9 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 T 1 r I T = tt,- -L-- r al -+- -4-- ri.iiiiagm'NE°", . , ffri .. L 1 -.� ' M , E ,-1` '( ' , 3 > A - , `�y`�A 1 _ «:,,1:er-r:v■r ! 1 1 1 `,�v `T-T- :' :,-,,-:"I ,,L `t `^ % ' .,p'" r 1L ��r 1", , (�1 1 \ x it , 1 i 1 1 1 , 1 , , 4, , IA' i1fiii 1 I r T'�, :i y' , I i ' 1 i LI I TILE. I3 h nt- ALL gICL1, 1'NIAL AOK , , ' , , 1 , , 1 1 ►C L 'y - ! NO 68 ,, __ "AD) ,Y, , i -- 5511 a , , 1 f�, S. ' ZA1 '1 ', '' C / 1 -- X di 28 x O SF SE 5D 4h r _ -+- r 4 A L i we 0 po 10 Ac 6 Ac ilk - • A ,÷..,,..,.. 1_. , 47. goo ..., : ,.‘.... % . Jo., _ ...,.1„. „.1... ,, ._ _J__ i _.? .1.4 ...v..ti ,_.,.1/4. • . , ./... 4._, ..41 ._ - 14 0 -%,4 '• I c 'ici.+. '--• 'IVi MI S. Mi. _ 54 (0400, 5 AC 11 41 PAI ,< 1- r, ; _ ;Q _ U_ maw 1� •-�,. A 4. - 1 i •1-4 l - -, Cj1 !05.' PIyam_ T T l - R f 5 -I ' ;� •i elk yilo, ' ,r r C; 28, N c� zs m3A aa3c \...;1'( I._,,.�' l ,%} CJ x __.4 } ' � l wHr 4 A2 A. .. ir Ac 111 4E1 ..1 Ar il♦I� 4.5 Ac O. 2C2A = 2" 41,411i •i�i� Ii,�IG�,G�fAvid �G�l�fn�g I -f 9UP1E1' A-311 CX a,111 _ ii 30 Ac N _I" 2 ADD •4 Ate 4Ae L. i ,_, /' 1 , itt: V 58i . 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 i 1 1 ! 1 1 5c r....::......".•.. _ _ 1 . . . ,J . _ fit tr f , ;/.•:17!:4.M.1 : 1 I -rc1 4 Ac i-- 'F' ..OfYU®LS — — -r i-T emu, ` 5111 , I i 1 _ • ' 1 ll - i. titallE1 • - r..,,..y� . 0 kI is rmi cm • lei 1A2 ` IA �— .HEST --- — CONIINOITAL BLVD �• , � /04:__L Al c«:•„�...,cam '.0 1 4., _ F-_-.7i t .,, 4.,;, iii1/47.... , . ,., , , Ili: ,..,. , ,, i _....,‘ 412D4 _7 7.11 ..t_ ,— . ........,,is..3.1.3...--; . .ri,7-'0-4 17.„ -r- • - ,�� '`�, `,• TRACT MAP s. , , 1N 1 11 �'iIli ARK Pi, 8F-2 1- {T��Q9j7 j 23.3 u 32. At HALL G�IA EI ~ - , ' =--- _.J`1 \C. 1,,_ -_ --1 - ,inn'�Fi i _4 SURY£, A-,O ' 1 1 ADJACENT OWNERS I AND ZONING 1 L. u v v 0 1 S -7 ElQ ) Southlake Four" �} 3C 3[ Investment FM 1709—Shady Oaks Ltd. I l I \ / State of Texas Pierce 2 fi l A vi �` . 2Homes _ , rtJ�'� I I77st R. V . - 1 D. Altena /� 4. 47../ 4' / a Southlake �� J.V. M. Kennedy Pulte / Homes �Q' T. Jacobowski Q — . o Pulte, Homes �c j G ( \ --- Spin #14 Representative `c\ B ` Karen Cienki CT Os v • ----T • + ---t- _ . / 1 - C) tc) -� 15 Fri 1 am Rs - . r - ..1 - ) CADDO LAKE \ ii — . —- . - 8F-3 — — . n City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMM / ase No.: ZA 95-90 Review No: Two Date of Review: 9/29/9 Project Name: Site Plan - Lot 6, Hiram Granberry No. 581 Addition. 0.908 acres situated in the Granberry Survey,Abstract No. 581 OWNER/APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Timothy Huckabee Huckabee&Associates. Inc. 2000 E. Highway 114 P.O. Drawer 611 Southlake. Texas 76092 Stephensville. Texas 76401 Phone: (817) 329-4746 Phone: (817) 968-5588 Fax : (817)481-9793 Fax: (817) 968-5668 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/25/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY MESTroiNis OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787.CITY 1. Correct the discrepancies in the floor areas shown on the graphic, the Site Data Summary, and the Building Design Criteria. 2. Ordinance 480-S (Corridor Overlay Zone)requires that non-residential buildings have a minimum building setback of 40' from property lines adjacent to properties zoned residential or properties having a residential L.U.D. . The building is to close to the west line. Please note that although the property adjacent to the west is designated as "Medium Density Residential" on the Approved Land Use Plan, it is more likely to be developed as business/commercial. 3. Driveway Ordinance No. 634 requires a minimum 500' between the centerline of the proposed driveway and any existing driveways and/or street intersections. The applicant has shown the proposed driveway centerline to be 207.5' from the west line of Lake Crest Drive. 4. Provide the required landscape parking islands for rear parking area. Ordinance 480-S (Corridor Overlay Zone) requires that each row of parking stalls have 18 s.f per stall of landscaped parking islands, 8'bc-to-bc if curbed,and 9'ep-to-ep if no curb, and equal to the depth of the parking stall. It appears that the applicant has provide the required landscape parking islands in the front parking area. C 8F-4 City of Southlake,Texas * Any request for a reduction in the required number of parking spaces will require a variance granted by the Zoning Board of Adjustments. * A separate construction plan and permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and Zoning Ordinance No. 480(Section 42, Bufferyards) are required prior to issuance of building permit. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timothy Huckabee Huckabee&Associates, Inc. G:\WPF\REV\95\95-090SP.WPD 8F-5 Et _ 1 ill 1 C "------------- bi NI 1 I K of d 0 4 4 41 t` ,i +his```\ ! 41.1Y .,J[ • 1gap r r• 41 �� 31� I it FPN . 4 •A 1111! 2 ' *.:.:::1 .4....1 1 • 1 � i 1.1 ? R Ii ::::!.::::' . 711 1 11 ' 1 .--... .,), , ii , 1 I .i5 , 1 _ . .::::... . r-:...: i 1 •,ell. c ' A ii pi E 2 I I t ': if M1` t 2 2 ff !i 1 4 naa� ClF Pi 2 rrl=1.71�_ - 0� ;3 ' - 1 is -zl','� it � 'ui^ t _&-f J ►' :u d ~ 1 '7j tW�111"S. - .' : : rill:1=b:I� _g: -y,e,•;.a 1-i; ., i 1 it i s!I: !leg-I. !s 19 -' n , r Litt :itittr, I 2g dig ii ! r� I • 2727 a a • : • ! 1 e i I ? I Ei �, fIi .Iplui 1 [ f i t r k i i i tY1 1 ' ] . , EI5 i I 12.0 ` Fs r � I I 1 / g; i;1; i . i i I ! . . . ilNii i 111 b 11, 1 ill toil!, i ; iiii n2772 7a a as .anw.v.o.1 ,.-',,,,e j (4.01 8F-6 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-85,Concept Plan/Southlake Retail Center REQUESTED ACTION: Concept Plan for Southlake Retail Center, being legally described as 3.351 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, Tract 2B and proposed as Lots 1,2 & 3 W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition. LOCATION: 1800' West of N. Peytonville Ave., 350' East of Randol Mill Ave., and on the North of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) OWNERS/APPLICANTS: DKV (Sutton)Partners II,L.P., Drews Realty Group, General Partners CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO.NOTICES SENT: Eight(8) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P&Z ACTION: September 7, 1995; Approved to Table (7-0) ZA95-70, Concept Plan for Southlake Retail Center, until the September 21, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the applicant's request. September 21, 1995; Approved (7-0), subject to the Plan Review Summary No.2 dated September 15, 1995,deleting item#1 (rear yard setback required by the corridor overlay zone), item#2B (driveway throat depths)and item#5 (parking within bufferyards); modifying item#6(bufferyards)to allow 10''O' bufferyard on the south side (along F.M. 1709) of Lot 1, and delete the 5"A' bufferyards required on the east side of Lots 2 and 3 and the west side of Lots 1 and 2 (in the common drives) as shown. On item 2A,permit the driveway locations as shown on the plan with the following stipulations: western drive is an entrance only, middle drive is "right-in" / "right-out," and the eastern drive is full access drive as shown. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No.2 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in zfrthe Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated September 29, 1995. /y KPG/ls 8G-1 1 1 ' J IAIA r 1 HmIa T-I- r-I-7- - - - 55 —7 1 1 1 i , — / 1 68TA i ----L+„t _,L Lr- ERIAIAIAIA 1A1A 1A1A 1AIA IAIA2A _ _ _ J , -, i , - 28 2C 2 zo 2E 9E .1,'ft -1----1 ses Ila / , 1'.,:i i1 I, -I, - tA1AZG -- - 1 1 I �` Abe_ i i i 1 1 — CILixr - - -- I 1 - T 4 IA1A3 J- -11 • •`1` - KELLER CIT II .It : N 13 3E 3EIA 38 9 y j 1 9 9 Al 9A1A . -�+. elf-l�J'� U] f�I ; I, `,\ a o i ° ° I RP s A t.fr ,,-s,9 18 . I °N , pEE N - 1 a - 3C1 1 • ,1; ( 981 .- 1Et IA 1 1 j,� 1 4 I X. 3E1 1 1 G�. (� tE 3H - 1 Iy 9C1 tot _, . .` ' - 6JI� ' 102 ,: Qy■ - 341 '— .1.410... l i 1 �N111r rr : -- \ - I i 1 1 i i 103 10 ", '•II•. 3C, 8A2� I 1 l 1 J • A 3 g� 8 - - - 7 78 7A 6A 60 8A28. tJ I✓� . . `s ESI OUJR 29 7.8 Ac 2 'r, kk S - ` >h Ac _J 0 E -V.m 2 k i J l-3 3-3 6Ac 9.5 Ac I I 1 1 Ii i.! -. 6 6 8 8A28 8A2C I a y 111 • -_ DII 1 ' -! 2 Q 8A3 8 8 88 f— -�- . ID 4 ROAD �-� --- 1 .`t 2 1 .' , i • © J- . a y .262 -- ---- 2C3 2C9 . 1 2C31 I i I i I 1,/--- 1 �-— 1 1 t7.5 IAtA 40,1 3 V.: 1 1— - IA f • - NP 4 , 5� --tj i 1A1A i 3C1 3C2 C 3 - 0- LIMB cr5sd 75 2 • `O 20 Ac 3C2A HI( G - _ - ESQ 1 - - - © . *- 2A3 R) c'� zo PIEk zE ,-- - '_ w 1- _ - A 2R' < 3Ait 9.3Ac JaADD• 'w. -1 Ea v Ea� , - - - ,� l •. .*.._.-.- 201 IR f � . 2A5 i 2f 3 / ill' Q 2A1 �`. 1 __- IA .� m S`` 3A1 i - it A . - - - - 2A 2A6 ~- E.r imow° 4 cS -40 II A. E B - - ..>` K I 2A4 -— -- . _ . .L E N 3 _�---- 28 r A _ TRACT MAP SCt . _ 14.5 Ac - - -Alin - - 10 1 A:Li: v 8G-2 58 SA1 , - - ----, 152 Ac 5A2 1 t_ - _ _ II ini �l u1 154 Ac A� I rtAu `I - - - p ,Ay. - ,...t . • _ I .•• m p Ir'-(\, V • ....., ... 1/4-), . . - ___, - - --- • -- c - • _ Spin #13 Representative Rex Potter I . _ . .._____L_, til----j__ _ _ _ ._„;_ . __ • •. _ _ _ _ CLE R 7 1 Myers Meadow . .z. ----- 1 T. /. • 1A1A' . — 1 / "R-PUD" '�Q' I "AG" "R-PUD" \litilk 1 , Fred Joyce-Mary Meyers i 1A . .11V J • 2 1111\ oc) . c /10 R. Goode W \- 2A3 45 2A2 1 "C-3„ "C-2" M&H Food Mart i I Southlake JV i--- 1 � 1 i 4 • • „C-3" > / , 2R \-\y< Albereson's Inc. 1 . i1 PM) 3R "c-3„ U \41..--1 0 1 R Lf. n < / -‘- 1 C.i.11 1 -( . 2 V Y A - ...:- 3R 1 J ADJACENT OWNERS i AND ZONING a - - • —J C �'.� � 8G-3 City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-85 Review No: Three Date of Review: 9/29/95 Project Name: Concept Plan-Southlake Retail Center,Lots 1-3.W.R. Eaves No.500 Addition,3.351 Acres in the W.R. Eaves Survey Abst. #500 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: DKV (Sutton) Partners II. L.P. Collins/Reinsenbichler Architects 5440 Harvest Hill Road. Suite 150 5910 N. Central Expwy.. Suite 100 Dallas.Texas 75230 Dallas.Texas 75206 Phone : (214)490-3977 Phone: (214) 987-5000 Fax : (214) 392-1109 Fax : (214) 987-5001 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/25/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Label the rear yard building setback line for Lot 1. It appears that the applicant has provided a 35'rear yard building setback for Lot 1.According to Ordinance 480-S,Corridor Overlay Zone,a 40'rear yard building setback is required adjacent to the residentially zoned Private Common Open Space#3 of Myers Meadow Phase Two . 2. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways: A. The spacing between the two driveway entrances in Lot 3 does not appear to meet the requirements of the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. A minimum 250' spacing is required between limited access driveway entrance centerlines. B. The driveway throat depths do not meet the minimum requirements of the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. Based on the number of parking spaces and three driveways,the throat depths must be a minimum of 50' from the property line/R.O.W. . 3. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards: A. According to Ordinance 480-S,Corridor Overlay Zone, a 20'- 0 bufferyard is required along front portion of the project adjacent to West Southlake Boulevard. The applicant has provided a 20'bufferyard and has met or exceeded the minimum plantings required for Lots 2&3.The applicant has provided only a 10' bufferyard for Lot 1, but has met has or exceeded the required number of plantings for a 20'-O bufferyard. B. Verify the "provided" bufferyard shown in the bufferyard chart for the west line of Lot 3.It appears that the applicant has provided a 5'bufferyard along this line. (•1 8G-4 • City of Southlake,Texas * Building articulation requirements will not be reviewed at the Concept Plan level. This issue will be addressed upon review of the Site Plans. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this concept plan.A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs.The applicant should be aware that the sign located in the southeast corner of Lot 1,must be setback a minimum of 15'off the property lines. * No review of the landscaping is intended with this concept plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a development site plan, landscape plan,and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: DKV (Sutton)Partners II,L.P. Collins/Reinsenbichler Architects G:\WPFIREV\95\95-085CP.WPD 8G-5 t ;.t E Q Q i.g ,N+� 1 R if ,l 4: .� al I g AI .e 111JIIL 011 G • Y ! _ ggigh r 1 2 I is f !€■.. .,p.. _ � � I lig i s }.}lt" �'• I yea ii' `ti !I .1 _�f :;; P r, '. 82 .t2 3 # tn'}' .�J 1 i s 1350 i!ng °y4K1i °s"ai A2 •'!L�/ I ---::: , g..: pQV S is }s} ti if'I" ° '`I 1. :'� : :Yjti .f°y= ■l .. i. it---. .. 5-4 f v }p} "w ° ' `ICY ��i — _ — ',• s i_J� _> is .10 i.c , , r-7,0, 4 1 "� /� ilia M SOY A i 11 1 1 i 1 1 O If NI�R j- o%wi�: q 7J�+ i ili Li - /0 ,,,,_ii I I ---6' Fj ®� LI; I `? 4, y tw cm l' %.,..,;•.„1,k: 1 !I gil ...! ,J1,2 :.: `44 i 'fit < J tilt ...y cif-� i € i_ V / X'66CMdM1►QI[11 9 E }_i� ■■ ® I > r m ® O lMl III I■ r 41-•- ::-tit ..,:.. f.--. , I . tlt1q1�� �@ _10 vit tali, 22- 2271. 4• . - ''. IR q "▪E I ;�j xgx7t�: ~ " : A xs I I : = 11A .., ; „{�'` .f ` i Pt.': — 4- — / W I p / op 4 �< - CI,\ 1 i iii!ilai8 a- yi 1 ai ±r£ :.:vi % ;i• -31 1 < YHY•4 d: '58 fir i 33 '1 'L 'l ;; ?i11 �ti j"si ( s3s j; •^P• 00 skill/ 1.3 VI �; 71 i� i! iI it ! 4i11 E 11j`Tr t I i 4 jj`;�i tj, L tn 1 ' 1 1 � t j} fjgJ IX a, ! § Iig s Bill Id j''E!;.ast;ts rrstst::lxk�j��:t+ir-'k,•yyjZltna 4f ' ,j 1 I I " te 5 ° I" 'I j l� u -, ' L 1 1teLtala9s` Est a;irydiiR r �sr�sIii .i[ tj ji1 8 i� so so E l 1 4,I .t„e ; : i ! i�i) o +• a 3+,,� +I ti aae L 7J .' „ a qqz ,� RS•S\R p t *IFii` L y•LfleRtl' ` is {gYR si•�tlf + 2 ��\ 1��§ a $ 7 •I -me .L I ..LI:...-.1...1_,„,As..-I i u ills N. 01 i 1;11 1 0000L JgliEt1 e W: l;ejYit Y, i;2 1. "--- — .r- E • 13 W '"s;', 0::rCCrCGTr h ama gr. is if,lii ny✓ i Yi 1.."- -et . =• ' •g8 W W W. \ Q ii O i. II ., =--L 3 El IL =°', w. a'llre w N• \ \ • . .a 1 -. \ e " te� # ii •\ \ .... 9 ««-. 1.9g za Tom' R $ 0 31 �Si 4:8 II . i acR , r w+ „LI 2i P t . .1;rtf-ie-7--1"-- 4 -`-lt g 11 h r. b,«kb, ' Ak 2 ii . .2. -. ii.,..,. .a. - 1.-.-' 1 ii 15 r • ..Ft 1 I I 1 -, 3:44 :A.4 ze .... 1••1.11 , at + Y' s! it a -.ti --: FQta.l g:w•w� e'g V, >ti/rfei'� • O dl fill! sa v ti 1 o iag r "+e ►t �o—.•. s . r a tI ' zi ti. >; 4' 6:. 1111: S{ _ =je= d.L:a °Ri R ! G Oil \ I a'r.---:---7- ..\ :8k. , 1, it f, 1 1fRIsl 1•F i! it " o«^ ' 1li ai I E auer— II d e\I �\` ' 91 4. a=�. 131E _ e,/ 0.91 .7ea''l+• I• ef,t4,04:. r *1.' iii 1 Ji, i r_3, •_9Pir 1 'iY�'a�.. '^ I r� fw f_ if! g 1-j1 1 �i ill t If J-r..7,:- i IS I�l�'sRi ; .isfr' ,ate 74 sl , ' - i'. if 1 ki■ 'e'ar 1. 3 ', e . , { p t I I 1 w- 7 �� 'a E t '>' J1 iii 1 1, 0 gv • I i3 ..... , d • a's ''A •[iRf fV,E•yf••i .,f00 11 jg ill�st r' i �t. • J ....sue,• r ii1V >4;�. e0...,. N1$ rii�1 . ! t Y i a W ' I! „ f g / 1 1 `k. r i! - g - t:, y _ is , Ili ,._ U "f 14,1 ll 4 +{{//t� 41 3�C� �f JD 1 jl •.r it "1 ta Eng ..i. :„1: 0 tilltill ! g, to igl . , not! . F °Y ..��'•o�lii ��� tri E.rt. i i�Fa, 1,41' 1 !1 !i 1 i1 d�t 4 (....„.::: :::., r. a a� I 1,r QC ' ref+ i t IJ I s{ I;';! I e```�. . li lb Ill" WI 11 y'1 % 8G-7 . g$ tom.a... ibre .< fAaiRina3t : attx�j aRp 1`! a ia. tla9la: 171! e co • +seaesa: satac .a r7 0 Iiiiiiiteialiii :i@ i p o �pp R718C• ttiittaR • ta t j!q •Vl ., 9RRa$ :aajtliIN3 ! i ! -41_, V �" •blGk ER4Pgc Rtit iHil i;��i 82.<o a < �i I c kl\i‘ T id sqa. ! {e t R g. a, s otLI •I A '� ` siJ/ : !, , 9 .gil 1. w 1.. • Willr''1 i' i I ' 6:. -....„.......' :" .....-- A'01;,1 4 flar.7716112,..4.40: 1. - /' i�� 7- e1' " , � t4,-T j ` t i l t Za ° _ ,a , �. � A. �.a !q�2R r • ' 'a � co I , . .i . ..... ,1, 1 ...•::....., • _ ,. /. .1 .E k 4 , . ,.. 3 1 11 qi . ( a a I o 0 4., it / ! . gilli ;iI ' St 4 A Al M L y. Q . a • lt/ hi. .- s 4' I •t.!; • •�\ _ \ • .b.,‘„a4.712 . . At 7 : * li:1 n‘ • '. rs txh... i Ili- it i r— . ,.. ,. 3 ii . \itte. :VI LI' •1/ • / li • f 3\$. ,,,. ,,\ ../.....) (1.0,,,„ . III 1 li 1 '7. -- . 4 . .• ... .„, / • - I ., i .... ..... 8G-8 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-94,Site Plan/Schlotzsky's Restaurant REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for Schlotzsky's, being proposed as Lot 1, W. R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, and being legally described as a portion of Tract 2B, 0.826 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500 LOCATION: North of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) approximately 800' East of Randol Mill Ave. OWNER: Schlotzsky's Inc. APPLICANT: Perspective Design, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO.NOTICES SENT: Five(5) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995; Approved(7-0); subject to the Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated September 15, 1995, deleting item #6 (rear yard setback established by corridor overlay zone), modifying item #14 (deleting 5' Bufferyard 'A' on the West, reducing 20' Bufferyard'0' on the South to 10' Bufferyard'0'as shown,and permitting the interior landscape parking islands as shown--to conform to the concept plan as approved), and on item #16 (building articulation--OK as shown). STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments in the Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of those items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated September 29, 1995. KPG/ls GAW PFNMEMo\CASES95\95-94SP.1 CC 8H-1 ' P` I ? '1 1 \\ ,' s I • —1-- KELLER CITY LIMIT 9(' ILL - - - - 1 JF3 3F10 —301 30 3A 3 3E 3E1Ai 3g= I1�a — 9 3 9 9 9A2 9AtA. -4. i�OO U,ERr ' •S , I. $FIC 0 2 3 J nD 2M€r A-519 IB • L) 3F9 3F18 --�2A 361/ 9A 9A1 ___. GwOfCIII / C �ER ,3N3 ' ,� 7c 20 s h 1 I 1 3F4.„,,i1NJ f'�E'�— C"O 90 --- 0 —a p i ( L _ 'T.:a:,•..:�. �'J Y 302 ppL ' 1E, - ---'3F r— ,—,3712 3 1 I r'l`�1� �/ 901 O 2 3FIE�� 1 1 fI/ 1 C� -*'3 3F1L 19 x 3E1 1 14 1 �. IE R��N 711 - -3F6 3FiA ' � en60 Ac `Acg • 1 - 3F2 3F1G3M ._ , �i,L , , 102 , N 3F11 3F1N 3C J �} 10 A IN ICI - - 7C 7 78 7A 6A 6A2B /R' B 41 - -;- -- JJOHIINni J. FRESHOO LJII 3 ).6k 2 1 • yak AII _ ..{ � --- SLY A-•,j1/ k _j05 k 2 3C 2 Tn� ! _ T- ' 19k 33 6k 9.5k 1 \ t 8 L�` / - , k 6 6 88A261r; 1 ..�� _• q•�,i '2 �,,s1 -*" -_- 2 ��VN 8A3 i .y_ _ ' _ - ..}_. l- _ PP �� V t a EN © 1 , , 1 1 !I is I iE 2C5 l 1 �V - D 181A P ,' , U c c -.,J ' ' u, 68 N._� _` FLORENCE - '" Q - -- __.-.6.3 k ELEY 12.6 Ae ---'�i-- -- ��AS- —"IAIA r IC` . . SCHOOL 1 , a iv T-- 3 OR le --T u T--- ' IA -- ---I - 4 ---- ; a - - - � -- _- O pD ,��, �K1/.a lEA!ES '—, NCI '�/R k--- 20 A -----+--- A - 201 ' IR P ) 2A5 .. -- --.1 _ J 2AIA n 7A1 \ 3/ 2C27 1 1 1 I 3 _ aI1�/Y' ti "CST lAl 2C!7�7 --T' ! /r_4 C pp �/`{�I 2A6 apF� -- / A11A - C 2 V ILL•- lY�''-��� �}1�� G. A LE�� ` -.FA zw4 1. Si.R A-18 �• U 1 I NER ,C < --- rile leg 4A ❑ AMi ® 1111lir — r G{..- __. 122k _ 14.5 Ac --AI3F-- 4E 441 411 •• — 5 k 10 k 4NIC 5A2.2 . l 8.6 Ac 8.4 k 15.2� IS k i �._.~-11403F. M I AA1 <1 1A4 g'f� flfY �1 u 4 ;/14 1A31 ,A FAR u 2A2 1 2 qF cc A 6A1 6 1 1 5 AA 9THIOMAS J T--r,n r F•5 C -. I ! ! ! 1 mumminI 183 ' N 1 A-1502 c B 4c 40 6krk ,e NOr ,;,lok)0.•� .., 2A2.iii 59 IA 9.85k 9.85k 19.)k 6*1* A4 1 9.65kil -!'�1 684A1 RBIB 4299 k felli 4A9 1t Ac �..;,aa. ;.:,t_�:� I. _ 3 Mill lc �2 i 1 •i 2A3 I 2 • 6A2 6(1 JEj 1�8 ��1 IAB < 3-6F1A 6F2 181 1818 AI 161A 13 k m 7.86 k _'� 3.6k 6.ik 1. 2k m 0 F,iIE 1 3 .� 5A 4A 3 4 38 - ES KELLER CITY LIMIT 2 CO �}{ 19 11.27 k CARROLL F EUNENTl \� AI SPICY A-.346 EHIG 4' r 581A 19 k 25 k 25 At. �^—�—L^\ u k k t Lw�j 4 �� sAMUE=d H. THO S ON \.� ..�(iiii.y. 1 _RO / , 51)RHFr A_r5a r .6... ,'ATE TRACT MAP F ; ,A , 1 — — ) / ?Cl29 / --_� " 16.44 k . J 8H-2 Iif 1 !_-1 `° AED� CHDA � 1 0/I - I T. 1 r . L. !--- , , riz / 0 2 1 ADJACENT OWNERS i - . J i AND ZONING i i --I ‘ ,7/ u Spin #13 Representative — Rex Potter \'. 1L _I CLE ____) T. State of Texas F. Joyce—M. Myers Ent. Inc.\ ,`( ) "PUD" • __1: \ 46,1 Al 4 "PUD" ! IL F. Joyce—M. Myers Ent. Inc. -----' 1A1A i /1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.111.1poll Iry , C-3u 2 DKV (Sutton) ()j- R. Goode /\O Partners 2 "C-2" 2A3 2A2 F Southlake J.V. "C-3" 1 L , , r--; /\ N o 0 ,i A / i 1 , f 8H-3 , I 1 1 ,� 1 1 U . ✓L Y A -\ /1� • City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 95-94 Review No: Two Date of Review:9/29/95 Project Name: Site Plan -Schlotzsky's, Southlake Retail Center,Lot 1.W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, 3.351 Acres in the W.R. Eaves Survey Abst. #500 OWNER: ARCHITECT: PKV (Sutton) Partners IL L.P. PDI - W. David Lee,AIA Architect 5440 Harvest Hill Road. Suite 150 3207 Justin Rd.. Suite B Dallas. Texas 75230 Flower Mound. Texas 75028 Phone : (214)490-3977 Phone: (214) 724-0596 Fax : (214) 392-1109 Fax : (214) 355-1180 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/25/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787.CITY The following changes are needed on Sheet No. C-4, titled"Site Plan". Any changes made which would affect or contradict information shown on the other support drawings should also be reflected on the affected drawing. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties: A. Show lot lines,and easements of Lots 5-8,Block 1 Southlake Crossing Phase II located across West Southlake Boulevard. B. Label the zoning("P.U.D. 480-52") and the L.U.D. (Med. Density Res.)for"Myers Meadow Phase Two adjacent to the north line of the project. C. Label the zoning("C-2") and L.U.D. (Mixed Use) for Lot 2 adjacent to the west line of the project. 2. Provide dimensions at 90°to the south property and the east property line from the closet point of the building relative to each property line. 3. Show and label the front, side,and rear building setback lines. The required front building setback is 50', side building setback is 15',and the required rear yard building setback is a minimum of 40'if the proposed the building is to be 1 story and no greater than 20' in height. Otherwise,the building must be setback from the rear property line so as not to encroach a 4:1 slope from the rear property line. Please note that the building as shown encroaches the minimum allowable rear setback line. 4 Show the location type and height of all proposed luminaries. 5. Provide a dimension to the nearest existing fire hydrant from a property corner and show any proposed hydrants.Note whether fire hydrants are existing or proposed. 8H-4 City of Southlake,Texas 6. Label all pedestrian walks. 7. Show, label, and dimension all fire lanes. 8. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways: A. Provide the distance to the nearest right-of-way intersection, and/or driveway entrance centerline, in both directions along West Southlake Boulevard, from the proposed driveway entrance centerline. B. Driveway location must be according to the approved concept plan for this project. C. Provide driveway throat depths according to the approved concept plan for this project. 9. Provide the existing land use(i.e.Vacant,Residential,or Agricultural),and the land use designation according to the City's approved Land Use Plan(L.U.D.- "Mixed Use")in the Site Data Summary. 10. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards and/or landscape areas: A. Show(with hatched or shaded areas) and label all landscape areas and the type and width of all bufferyards(i.e. 10'-F1 Bufferyard,20'-O Bufferyard)on the graphic. B. Provide the bufferyards, interior landscaping, and planting calculation chart for Lot 1 according to the approved concept plan for this project. C. No parking stalls are allowed within the bufferyards. As currently shown,the parking stalls along the southerly portion of the project will encroach the required 20'-O bufferyard. The following changes are needed on SheetA-6 showing the elevations of the proposed building.Any changes made which would affect or contradict information shown on the Site Plan or other support drawings should also be reflected on the affected drawing. 11. Compliance with the articulation requirements of Ordinance No. 480-S is listed in the chart below. Please note that the architectural rendering of the building is a mirror of the foot print on the Site Plan, and does not appear to match exactly. Horizontal Vertical Facade Articulation Articulation Front yes yes Side(along 1709) no* no Side no no Rear no yes *The side along 1709 appears to meet the intent of the horizontal articulation section of the ordinance; however,the facade exceeds 3X the wall height by approximately 9'. 8H-5 • City of Southlake,Texas * According to the Utility Plan submitted with this project, a minimum 15' wide Utility Easement adequate in length to cover the proposed sanitary sewer manhole and stub along the north portion of the project will be required . * No review of the landscape and irrigation plans is intended with this Site Plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this Site Plan. Plans meeting the requirements of the Sign Ordinance No. will be required prior to issuance of a sign permit. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a development site plan, landscape plan,and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: DKV(Sutton) Partners II,L.P. PDI-W. David Lee,AIA Architect Tomden Engineering, 9202 Markville, Dallas,Texas 75243 Schlotzsky's,Inc. 200 W. 4th Street, Austin, Texas 78701 G:\WPF%REV\95\95-094SP.W PD 8H-6 rn r' . �' i, . . I. Jam• eW 1 i` c „E �. . Q 4011101 o ti 'MIL'INVW O.'G,.$WC af►.l rsou Jd o vAVT U.a.'.,,,n.1... � • Y ' a -i t I'"�'-`' ` S/C� SZ O . }rye ul<i{�2J ; tj • 1 .1 Ilt l. 1 '. 1 .� i i ; 1.t 1 !1in g I it • lily K di; 11 li IY1 f / * i' f €3 / f E r•4-t t l c • iil l it / t. W • Y J V Ae s .� . 7- $ Y I iy �i1 / 4 He � . , i® o ® Will 1 [r d } : "__ i ts i et D �' It1llfl' 1 4 . i 1 e __ il "...� -a'—= • d isl P11110111 ' ' e[ ij. ,. wa. '..,.e'vii 'i 1 Y {lifilltItIii //// . . -Li O Y i 3 id t . • i 1 ifsliii t t 1 1 Il I eiiHIQIiI1ii 1 1i 1 i 1 1 - Id ii1. ;Hill PI ' i '! ! 1i'I'! 'i!t ii ; II sill !� ! liiIt'liliil !to 11 O. ii: i . I ii` i ( 1 1 a "All{j!1 i:..{`1111t1 !1.i111� ' ���� �' 1 i ' ;'hi i ii I I i I t' i 1 t t >s tE !{�{III 11�, I i'i� ill'..1101 t 1,ii t.I e I If 1 II, i i i i 11 IE ii II !�Il 1 1i i II II i 1l 1I I i71i1;i;11 iii111, i! I i,l I{ 1 , III i 11 � li '<1 I li•i ! � li ! t,i t .i, i u• f1 1t��511t , a itl it ii 1{ 1 Ill 1 ilt 1$ -.1 ,III,lt Is IIIIII 11'iII illiilill.ti. i I 1 it I 111{ �� li ! . � , {�, litt � ; � i1i �111 1 ..., i I e i ,'lfi'aIIil�Idol' l�i hill:elil :, � iiltliii i.111iu i,� �' lIIIIIIIIIiIIi III I 1 II t i 1l1 tiiifEa t 'l�'iil 1 lit -" iitii 11111 Niel 1 �l.l�l• I i al I,1 I, t 1,�i.1ili• .. � 11114114 iliillt {i i i� I.,.1t , s �ii,Eii Dili{i�li��lili�{Ilillllii{{�,II�{�.Il�i!1i91! � �i{{{{1{ I 1 illiiu{ii{i{ 11.,fifj ' i 11011tt>itiia:.. . p ..�.ea.••••aa.a..,®®®® I I iI ( i 8H-7 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-70 Plat Showing REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Showing for Lots 1,2,& 3,W.R.Eaves No. 500 Addition,being 3.351 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey,Abstract No. 500,Tract 2B LOCATION: 1800 feet West of N. Peytonville Ave., 350 feet East of Randol Mill Ave., and on the north side of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) OWNER/APPLICANT: DKV(Sutton)Partners II, L.P., Drews Realty Group, General Partners CURRENT ZONING: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO.NOTICES SENT: Eight(8) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P&Z ACTION: July 20, 1995;Approved to Table(7-0)ZA95-70,Plat Showing for Lots 1, 2,&3,W.R.Eaves No. 500 Addition until the August 3, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the applicant's request. August 3, 1995;Approved(6-0)ZA95-70,Plat Showing for Lots 1,2,&3, W.R.Eaves No. 500 Addition subject to Plat Review Summary No.2 dated July 28, 1995. COUNCIL ACTION: August 15, 1995;Approved to Table(6-0)ZA95-70,Plat Showing for Lots 1, 2, & 3, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition until the September 5, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. September 12, 1995; Approved to Table(4-0)ZA95-70,Plat Showing for Lots 1,2,&3,W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition until the September 19, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. September 19, 1995;Approved to Table (5-0)ZA95-70, Plat Showing for Lots 1,2,&3,W.R.Eaves No. 500 Addition until the October 3, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. 8I-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ZA 95-70, PLAT SHOWING SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 2 STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the Plat Review Summary No. 4 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plat Review Summary No. 5 dated September 29, 1995. A single-lot Plat Showing for this tract was approved subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated February 1, 1994, but was never filed of record. kPAAV KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-70PS.3CC (kW 81-2 :;; Tr _ 1A1Aw -1- -�1 ... ---'L+4 4-X- , 687Anail 1A1A IAMA 1A1A 1A1A 1AMA 1A1A2A - _ - ' �' 1 --, 1 , , , ,- - 686 28 2C 2 20 2E BE /`'� -r_--+ 1_ 1 - 1A1A2F - - - �� i - -�4 -f- 1 685 i :.,7 1 1 1 1 r - Ela -- - 1_ -�- _ 1AtA2C , 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 - - - _ 1 ► �. - row s7uxf _ MEM/ : 1A1A3 1 1 6C ./ r _ a - - - - --1� I 1 • - KELLER CITEMI , r IAA 3 3E 3E1A 38 9 9 1 3 9 9 9A2 9A1A i 1 0 D 1 0 D 1 SURVEY A-519 . 6 • 1 i9A 9A1 _._-, n‘ti 0_ n D 18 III 3113 l.E1 ON 98 --, , �{p,E'� � 0 tE1 � 1 3H2 Ti 1 1".`► ,1; .�+( 981 7 1A 1 ;�, 1 �� tE w . ` 1 SC 3E1 1 q '• 9C1 101 •, . 1 i�1 `4 I S111F CI �a1 Iy1...- 3C ` 1 , 1 _ 103 1DR 8A2� 3 8 • 7 78 7A 6A 60 8A28 T N 5 R �- _- - ___. f: .„ 5SHOUR 7.8 Ac 2 i --,.�R ter• , �( Y cam, 2/ 2.9 OE 2.9 2 k _ __ AC 6Ac 9.5Ae I I � i � f _. - � • 1 6 6 8 8A28 8A2C p 1 1 _ jVl� _(ihreAPvrt 8A3 8 8 88 _ _ r - t- • -t }-' 10 B1 ROAD 1 2 2 ( - © J--_ 42 1-Y( 2C2 2C3 2C9 • 1 2C31 1 1 1 1 1 ' `S ' 1 . - 7,- ice---- 3D _ J1 _ j , 1 1 IAIA 3 _ _ _ j_ _ _ I 17.5 %iv . - - . -- 1" G 4 IA t 3C : _ _ _ ► '�✓ 1AIA 3C1 / 3C2 �•' 2A3 RP i '1 20 -•-- Y . - (..� 2E T 4rAl. w - -1- 1 III 4 . > ' 1 -i. J _ 9.3 Ac G� A • 2R '� 3A :1 t - 1 1 it 2F1 A4 uP:{,�D►5 201 1R JJ'"RR�� . 2A5 r 1 2f3 ✓ ' Q 2A1 J 3At --I . to .� 2AIA m 1 •r r- "_1 5 3 2A1 - - - - . 1 2A 2A6 \_� j� �� • SAt,, SA2A s i V G _.,, -KER� -- ESA '- - -VLLIE 3 _ _ ..___ . ._ 5A I 2M ' TRACT 5C1MAP 7 14.5 Ac ` — -AIR 10 V _ v 8I-3 5A1 5A2 1 t- - -... _ - ` ------ 152l _!►/ - 15.4 Ac ! & - -I I111A I 1 I`l lAI— F .r - -iI a o -›,t7 ,_- . . . , ,,, F)-ifLE-)P' V Aso, Spin #13 Representative _ Rex Potter - - - — ___1 . _ . ) \ CLER 1 Myers Meadow . ki._ . .1.' • T. ,• • 1A1A' / ,. / "R-PUD" �Q � . � . _ . _ .�.- 1A i "AG" "R-PUD" \Itill 7` a Fred Joyce-Mary Meyers i 1P 1 .IV \ G"2 7 u'J R. Goode2A3- 2 A 2 "C-3 "C-2" M&H Food Mart ' i Southlake JV i 4,A. . "C-3" > 2R \-\zs< Albertson's Inc. ' � 1V 3R 2� "C-3" — o1 s .�. 1 N1 � - (� v Y A 3R 1 J ADJACENT OWNERS I '• • AND ZONING �� \ /� 81-4 l ` City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No:ZA 95-70 Review No: Five Date of Review:9/29/95 Project Name: Plat Showing-Lots 1.2. &3,W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition.3.351 Ac..W.R.Eaves ,Survey Abst. #500 OWNER/APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: DKV (Sutton)Partners IL L.P. David C. Moak Surveyors. Inc. 5440 Harvest Hill Road. Suite 150 P.O. Box 1034 Dallas. Texas 75230 Hurst. Texas 76053 Phone : (214)490-3977 Phone: (817) 268-2211 Fax : Fax: (817) 282-0401 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/14/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Provide the County Deed Records Volume and Page for the 10'U.E. located long the south line and the 15'U.E. located along the north line of the Robert G. Brown tract. 2. The proposed Common Access Easements should be centered on the driveways as shown on the approved concept plan for this project. 3. Provide utility easements in accordance with the approved Utility Plans for this site. Water, sewer, and drainage require utility easements with a minimum width of 15'. * Original signatures and seals will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries(8.5" x 11" or 14" paper)with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider perimeter street and drainage,park dedication requirements,off-site sewer extensions, and off-site grade-to-drain permission. * All taxes due must be paid prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: DKV(Sutton)Partners II,L.P. C David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc. Washington&Associates Inc., 500 Grapevine Hwy. Ste. 375, Hurst,Texas 76054, (817)485-0707 G:\WPF\REV\95\95-070PS.W PD 81-5 1 t it2, a- �. g n a rr Pi lg:It I( .illit..,\ . , _ I ita I� I. • 1 ;I • Ir n % @ �, tF E 1 t7 ! at iti 11 1 AI 11414 . -t, W t. t ' hilt 11:i tltt hilt !€f g 1: 11, e! r I s415 rill 1 , lid 0 1 -- k i II ell�t r `f ?• / 1 / 5 s I ' ! !Ill i121111 YJIUV: f _ / a t�t• t ♦ I ;1:ill J t111 I t` . 0:1� l��'�l a �) it 9 . 11 • i±,jtt 1l ��,f �� \� i I Iiillii s 1i t1'f IJ\(1111 1 :i _ `ill li- e �jf `/ y44. . i@J 1 `I E g a ••\ 1 1a-l1-i11 i--htC 15 .w d i {i}l♦� ngi `e` E` lip pj ii pi. 0 I d §11 gi I 11 it /le 4=1 , N Nit! 41 ,11, lia 1 hi ilk '!Lill 141 t tei,. 14 Z11:4 411i Ili Ink IPIIIIIIiii Mir rdi rg N \ u t :��gm ii-t Ilt� its 1 ICI � s' J 8I-6 �� 5 is tit € City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-184,First Reading ZA 95-95,Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 3.678 acres situated in the J. G. Allen Survey,Abstract No. 18, Tract 6E1 LOCATION: North side of Union Church Rd., approximately 1200' West of Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938) OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Joseph& Kimiela Mortazavi CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Four(4) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995; Approved (7-0), rezoning of ZA 95-95 to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential KPG/ls G:\W PF\MEMO\CASES95\95-95Z.1 CC L 8J-1 ---- -—---—— pI. 9.3 Ac G0 I -`- i • . �149.F AA v La - --1 AD , 3RUT G pp�J ` r -- - e� A4 "'` 5✓' TL = ---- 20Ac --- - -rt _- * 201 IR P 2A5 1 _ I __ 2F3 ✓ Q 2A1 / --�--r __ .ice m 1 - 2C27 2C26 I i _ I ---- �� _1 WEST lAl` �2 ---r �A C, tl4. ?A 2A6 lli ',� �� I �� CD 10 SU? Y A-18 A. N 4 MI441 - CORN Ic ' 12.2 At � A 4141 1 M12 1 �' 5Ac 4E 4K11 41 . i 10 Ac Ili IC 4F 5A1 Y lA4 86Ac 8.4 Ac 15.2� 15.4A2 ���___ , AAt <4Ac 4K 1 1A3 lA I) /.Al4J4 � 1A28 -- a • 61 THOOMAS J T ,ynn; 6A MU I I I I I SUP Y A-1502 6 Ac I PP �)wr�rpa .. I I I I I I I t rie .I I I I9.85 Ac 9.85 Ac 19.7 Ac 6C4 6C2 C1era 9.65 Ac 4A9 sc ''' Ac r-a I 182 it I I I 2A3 III! 6A2 e3F1 - 6F1A ■ua 1B1 1818 181Ar 181A 4A8 m 7.86 Ac 6.1 Ac 2Ac hi 1 Iiii i . _ - --- -------- ---- _.- - __ 3FII I1 KELLER CITY LIMIT 10 SA 4A } • E llrE5TA rA(�H I ' 11.27 Ac J1 x L.A. � M Of �i51 5 58 CISA U BArlc LS 19 25 Ac 3E1 1 SUP Y A-346 GH4 �13A� 581A Ac 4 /�\` 44 Ac 80 Ac \kZ A INII V E_L�� OIL T W©I!\/II P C . A �./-�. SUR if A 7504 M �-.EC •i_;i 182 \ 5 1 L Iii: �11 8 _ OV TI - .•• --- -- --- --- (1111 R ` }C G 2C1 I IJ ( �i - .- - � ., __, 2 201 __� J � I 1 J. C;Ioo o0G`.95 SURVEY A-640 % _ H- L. . . ______. .... c-,.. „....___:,. TRACT MAP . 8J-2 / / I .. ..... 1_ __ 1 L `1 1 3 62 ADJACENT OWNERS I ' I. AND ZONING I I '; 1 '. VIC - AIEL Uf 7 A ,- v I Spin #15 Representative 1 I I Wayne & June Haney I i L 6CL 6C (, "AG" "SF-1A" 11 Ac W. Lippincott W. Lippincott 6 R. Reutlinger .. 1 /7 . ) i , W. Lippincott .� N m "AG„ 1 co "AG" /. 3 6 . 1 1 Ac J. McClendon ( "SF-1 A" 'ITY LIMIT City of Keller L, fr,i 8J-3 I CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-184 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEIN s .z . ,AND MORE$FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM.`:4 ? °a g1t D ? lAr SING l 3t ° '4 , SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; (Orry. PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as � a<` PrI der the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\CASES\480-184.IRD Page 1 8J-4 changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on • established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those (sior who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, G:\ORD\CASES\480-184.1 RD 8 J-5 Page 2 is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: • Being a g62,4 acre tract of land situated in the pp and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from"AG" Ag icultur v, ` E. .'A, Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a (0, violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:\ORD\CASES\480-184.1RD 8J-6 Page 3 Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. L MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:\ORD\CASES\480-184.1 RD Page 4 8J-7 • PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G:\ORD\CASES\480-184.1 RD Page 5 8J-8 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING et a capped iron rod stamped "Moak Surv. Inc." at the southeast corner of said tract. said point being by deed coil West at 1187.78 feet from the southeast corner of the said Allen survey, said point also being in the north line of Union Church Road ( County Road 3099); THENCE S 89' 37' 06" W along the north line of said Union Church Road, a distance of 364.66 feet to a capped iron rod stamped "Moak Surv. Inc.' at the southeast- corner of a 11 acre tract recorded in Volume 8226, Page 989. Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas; .THENCE NORTH a distance of 440.15 feet to a capped iron rod stomped "Moak Surv. Inc." at the southwest corner of a 12.15 acre tract recorded in Volume 6716. Page 2481. Deed Records Tarrant County. Texas; THENCE N 89' 43' 58" E a distance of 363.89 feet to a capped iron rod stamped "Moak Surv. Inc." at the northwest corner of a 1.5 acre tract recorded in Volume 5991, Page 612. Deed Records Tarrant County. Texas; THENCE S 00' 05' 57' E a distance of 439.42 feet to point of beginning containing 3.6.78 acres or 160.200 square feet of land more or less. L L G:\O RD\CAS ES\480-184.I RD Page 6 8J-9 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-96 Plat Showing REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Showing of Lots 7& 8,J. G. Allen No. 18 Addition, being 3.678 acres situated in the J.G. Allen Survey,Abstract No. 18, Tract 6E1 LOCATION: North side of Union Church Rd., approximately 1200' West of Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938) OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Joseph&Kimiela Morta7avi CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Four(4) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995; Approved (7-0), subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated September 15, 1995. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the comments of the Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated September 29, 1995. KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-96PS.I CC C 8K-1 • -s ____ 9.3 Ac -- -- --- - " -- -;--- ` 0 5 .� - - A4 J 5 I _ 1 a P.ri I ' • 20Ac --- - -rt-- - "1 1(t I 2A5 i 2A1 -T-- l _ iii ***i4AlA /\m 2C27 2C26 i r /��'� 1 •- 3 G� 2A1 ———— ' 2A 2A6 �/ *EST IA1 K2 2C.26 ---f - 5A4 5 401 ..� sAµ SA2A 5 C ER p \____ 4A3A 4AlA �� �114 ' G. QI.�LS�II � 3 6 --pp,RK--- --; 2�� O Io` � 4r� SU PE A-I6 -- �i �i uu 4A1 41 — ` SC1 ER 1C ORN 4141 12.2 Ac 14.5 Ac 1 A utto µ12 IKI Q1 _ -- 5 Ac 10 Ac 4H S8 -,- 4C {F SA1 -1__ IAt 1A4 8 6 Ac 8 4 Ac 15. Ac 15.4 Ac ;� zaD i A� ___ '�'A — 1 1 1A31 IA D ( 4J 4 1 i 5� 2A2 IA28 5 Ac 2 O 6A 6A1 68 682 6 �— 1 r 1 1 T W O IIG11 Q S J T . u V . 1 1 1 i I 18! 1 1 SURbTY A-I502 — 48 4C 40 1 0 6Ac2Ac SAc 7 • r II : 18 - 1 1 1 1 9.85 Ac 9.85 Ac 19.7 Ac 6A1A 6C4 I 6C2 CU -- 9.65 Ac 4A9 11 Ac 6C Ac / 1 • J 182 i i , 1 2A3 6A2 _ ' m ` . tl$F1 - 6F1A 6F2 < 181 mg1B1A I81A 4A8AO m 7.86 Ac 6.1 Ac 6F 2 Ac m 1 6-111 d 3F 3 N KEGLER CITY LIMIT 5A 4A 3 :780 5 = N 5°1 G L. ArrN 11.27 At 1. 1 . CLAY' �'r�(��{j 19 At ' >F1 SURVEY A-346 GLIO - II1111AI„581A 25 Ac//�� (��//����4pp pp DMUI �nJ�I (��/(�1�n /�` 44 Ac 60 Ac ( 4�UVt1l�J E_l. W., W IA/It lr✓c 1 , ��� SURYEY A-1504 E T 0 jlle?�-(E5 HQ BO .1A 2E �----- T 1 B�� K G� �+ + ../ �1 r I LRE \j, ` 2 c_— _ ) zj2-01 �____, t. J. HIE DINS SURVEY A-640 i; L . ,..:„ .._........... y „______---..; TRACT MAP - ____) • 8K-2 / / , L B 632 ADJACENT OWNERS I AND ZONING I I 7 n1 Spin #15 Representative I I I Wayne & June Haney ' i 6C4 6C ' "AG" 11 A c "S F-1 A" (lip, W. Lippincott W. Lippincott 6 R. Reutlinger ,././- / 6Fi ' — 6F1A�' ___ _ ,-, � Q t N c.� W Lippincott m "AG„ t co "AG" . 6 c 6 . 11 Ac J. McClendon k "SF-1 A" .,(: ‘ ,<z><*, ,--.. --:. -,----,, __:,._- __ _,,7-..-_,-._ -„-". .-._ ,-.=__ _ __-.,---.: ..._=.=: _.=_._-___ _...=_-_._ --_.-_. .__ .-.._ / TY L /M/ T City of Keller (....- 8K-3 - 1 City of South lake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY (bilio, Case No: ZA 95-96 Review No: Two Date of Review:9/29/95 Project Name: Plat Showing-Lot 7 and Lot 8.J.G.Allen No. 18 Addition.3,678 Acres in the J.G.Allen Survey Abst. #18 OWNER/APPLICANT:Joseph&Kimiela Mortazavi 2499 Union Church Road Keller. Texas 76248 SURVEYOR: Richard C. Maki 3605 Pioneer Parkway Arlington. Texas 76013 Phone: Phone: (817) 261-8138 Fax 'ax : (817)261-8223 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/22/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Provide a separate sketch showing any existing improvements with dimensions to property lines,or provide a letter signed by the owner that no improvements exist or that existing improvements are to be removed. (111111 * All taxes due must be paid prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Original signatures and seals will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries(8.5" x 11" or 14"paper)with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Joseph&Kimiela Mortazavi Richard C. Maki G:\WPF\REV\95\95-096PS.WPD 8K-4 . �C I; : E1 a j • 1 � fili i! _ 11 !' 1 ;Li ' it fs' ii S ,r, . ,. . . ill .iii il i 1: t il I gill I f j ill ilk i f ' i1 '; 1'i !Iil i (i Is ! 1 I I o .i i ii 1 iIg i iiji-1}ItII: i: t1 €1. s 111 %sl lip 1 ilIl ; # a1 % i -ill i 11411 {it: �> it I i! i it i 1 : [ 1et l j!de =i 8 ! � g,�`I le1 .... 4 li i ! i ; ' E f` I 1 ' E 00 Ohl it . S of lii I I dii Tilt lil i11 ll Ft 11 i ill!!1 1 ` II 11I1i ! fi bin I '!I ib 'i t lq ;Mild 1 1 In I t Y ift? ti, I g ° i 4;:! st _ I ; � r I qt E I ; 1� if k If AI al d j — i, (..., `�-- -- ` ----�tm.ia I.--- •uns I . 5 I y • 8 I .. 1 �Y s '� i I ref?) I � 2:, RR i _t hi �f- t ,41� jc.� e is et I4 „ill' 0p a �" ' _ ! I Zo t 1, r >� 1 k I , II tl ` i 1 V_ ,"ten• 1. 11 • 1 I n t t I !I I VI zV) a za -Ix px ) , Z~ NF i !LJ: Via 2 1}r __._______.___ _ i' I il .___....", 8K-5 bbnl `.h, b, C1 dd5 11611 I 09/28/95 17:09 $314 576 7005 MIDLAND GROUP I1j002 v. CSAMI N LNOAUYII S Midland DILWAUKEE RALEiGN HE ANMIDDLA D GROUP ICNSI MIDLAND A'QUISMONS. September 28, 1995 Mr. Greg Last Community Development Director City of Southlake Southlake, Texas RE: Preliminary plat for Farrar Tract Retail Development Site Village Center Southlake, Texas Dear Greg: Pursuant to our conversations, and my discussion with Mayor Fiekes this past week, this is to confirm that Midland Development would like to have our hearing on the above referenced preliminary plat contiimed or tabled until the City Counsel meeting on October 10, 1995. If their is any problem with said request please contact me immediately. Sincerely, it, . • wI a D i' S PMENP GROUP, INC. e 4.1 % Donald L. Silverman cc: Billie Farrar Barry Hudson Sandy Avery WEST PARKI 12655 OWE BOMBARD-SUITEE20E1 SAINT LOU IS,MISSOU RI 63141 TELEPHONESAMILE 3M-576-1900 FI+GSIM ILE 314-576-7005 VOICE MAIL-314.57B-1996 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-76 Preliminary Plat/Village Center REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Village Center, Lots 1-6, Block 1, and Lots 1-7, Block 2, being 44.328 acres situated in the T. Mahan Survey,Abstract No. 1049, being a portion of Tract 6 and also being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat of Farrar Addition and all of Lot 1,Block 1 of the Farrar Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1539, P.R.T.C.T. LOCATION: South and adjacent to East Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114), North and adjacent to East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709),and approximately 1000'West of Kimball Ave. OWNER: James Farrar, et. al. APPLICANT: The Midland Development Group CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/65 LDN Noise Contour NO.NOTICES SENT: Fifteen(15) RESPONSES: One (1)written response received within the 200' notification area: • Mary Evelyn Zembrod, 2141 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I am delighted with an expansion of the community's commercial base. Hopefully, this will help lower our taxes at some juncture." P &Z ACTION: August 3, 1995; Approved to Table (6-0) ZA95-76, Preliminary Plat for Village Center until the August 17, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the applicant's request and continue the public hearing. August 17, 1995; Approved (5-2) ZA95-76, Preliminary Plat for Village Loy, Center as amended and subject to Plat Review Summary No.2 dated August 11, 1995 with item#2B deleted. 8L-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK LZA95-76, PRELIMINARY PLAT SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 2 COUNCIL ACTION: September 12, 1995 (continuation of City Council Meeting from 09-05-95); Approved to Table(4-0)ZA95-76,Preliminary Plat for Village Center until the September 19, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. September 26, 1995 (continuation of City Council Meeting from 09-19-95); Approved to Table(7-0),ZA95-76,Preliminary Plat for Village Center until the October 3, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated August 11, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated September 1, 1995. Note that the plat shows a proposed public street (Village Center Drive) which divides the property in half and which aligns with Briarwood at Hwy. No. 114 on the North and approximately 430' East of the intersection of Westwood Drive and E. Southlake Blvd. on the South. Attached is an excerpt from a letter from Barry Hudson, consultant for the project,which addresses the road issues(e.g. alignment with existing streets, traffic movements and signalization, and centerline radii). Note that his comments are in response to the first Plat Review Summary, not the third review included in this packet. Following these comments is a reduction of the applicant's first submittal showing the Village Center aligning with Briarwood and Westwood. The road was relocated to its present location after hearing the comments of Woodland Heights' residents adamantly opposed to the first alignment. KPG/ls G:\WPFIMEMO\CASES95\95-76PP.3CC L 8L-2 3.21 Ac 3,,,B2 / .oii 1M lE '1 / �16S PA '11 1 C' }y allx''jjJ !�, .i;-o; ;fj;t ... . A-101114,4411.---: _ `Y'�?�aIG'� x1C1 5V •JG5-. 15.56 Ac 2 ;� ,.1 , - 1 4A L___ _ _ b (- 1 A IA 1A 1 1 1 ' 3Atc1 .)1 21,', 1i , ' — t �}�, 4 ,Qc . __ 3A1n2 11 - '_ I v II {, a 11E4 M ew, df� 'M 1 '1 1 1 1 i 1 --- . 2f3 SM 11 _i • 1 SA102 3 k , • 11 A r47 >w>m 3Aru �� • tt 2 ill211 H 1 4f3A JO�+ , N 1►' -- 3Aw 3A1H1 -- -- 6.2 k 11 I AIMI X. � • ''. r._ 3A1J6 tLt3 k • 2A3. 1r 1. to. 1r ILO' ... .Ms:-4‘ SAIJIIIJJ3 f .o CAFSOib s. i �' i yu, sa i '1 11a:1 i:,1 12,1 COOL '. Pl.(W ,11t ! 675kI 1 .4 ! '. --, „, • • r lithrzio. kin .. . . ..,<s... s,......). A--481 -� ......"...„......1 V MI° P1 LI'. ' 24 5G .4. . . .:: 2E7 7DG • . ,.... _ do �I` /� T�©�i Qa �d1 bANI m' 1. �/ Suent'Y A-la r s /�RJ .__ t 5A6A t1 a '" Z �SD�--� , s 3A2 3A11 • ' -•gill ®®®®® ��� r......., crrx �✓ I • `r; �. 2F -- -WNW do-6:-. ' �-Jm dl --- 582 isu -. LA '► I - s52C Aa---- ''A!.• '..!:. I "NORTH' ST PKWY Sat+��E�® • Sot. ', ,:x ♦a '}.alai 1... r, ` .. L ` - , ay '[t.vim `� 1, f .f/ � 1C 2 .2D �, ,1a S.> . J 1 __...,..,,:....?„..:......•. .gis : . ....„;.. frx„,:,..... ,...... .@r-'' . .. - W, —,„Es „ Qf ......it. \ 1511a ... ga '+ok. ,r *LA Oi..;:,►.�1�. Sir f 3fU.k �li` `I. - V ® tA2A 2W ����t $ • 3Ja . .• . 0 . _al Li.- • i.., .. '''....-*tip:::' 4Teit%-17----41-..-7 . .`` TRACT MAP 10', f NSF a� W � � N N m L. (lkor- _ 1.2 1 ` m Ci cn N m ci, CO Orr '4 To Q • - c— CV I p I o J i I Q T i o V i m - E 1 O Q N V) c o 'n IAv, Q � S.) m N g et - Z 0 v w v 'o0 MAZ N O m - Z Z N 0. _ a • W CIZ--� 2 cn V Z a as 13 (----; is. I 'CC v a i �loddnS pi O C ' Q ' C as L� N C g o2 I N 2-- IV 2 \ N Q N / ";16; 5.)- n N • I U Q• cn tU 1 Q. ' -_ c6 'a: (-NJ 8L-4 j 1 I 1 I _ City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-76 Review No: Three Date of Review: 9/01/95 Project Name: Preliminary Plat-Village Center,44.328 Ac.Thomas Mahan Survey Abst.# 1049 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: The Midland Development Group JBM Engineers &Planners 12655 Olive Boulevard. Westpark I. Suite 200 2630 W. Freeway. Suite 100 St. Louis. Missouri 63141 Fort Worth.Texas 76020 Phone: (214) 980-8806. (314) 576-1900 Phone: (817)429-7560 Fax : (214) 980-8789. (314) 576-7005 Fax : (817)429-9322 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/21/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to rights of way: A. Additional right of way along East Southlake Boulevard will be required for acceleration, deceleration,and turn lanes. The typical requirement for acceleration/deceleration lane right of way dedication is 12' x 150' with a 150' transition. The applicant has provided right of dedications of 5'x 165' for deceleration and 5'x 175' for acceleration. B. Provide minimum center line radii of 600' feet for Village Center Drive. 2. Provide a 15'Drainage Easement around the main storm sewer trunk line crossing Lot 3,Block 1,and extend the easement to either the north or the east line of Lot 6, Block 1. * Lot 1,Block 1,Farrar Addition,Cabinet A, Slide 1539,P.R.T.C.T.,must be vacated before the final plat can be filed.A copy of the standard operating procedure for plat vacation has been forwarded to the applicant and engineer. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Midland Development Group,Attn: Donald Silverman ////// JBM Engineers&Planners James Farrar, C/O Farrar Real Estate, 600 West Park Row,Arlington,Texas 76020 Phone: (817)277-4411 G:\W PF\REV\95\95-076PP.W PD 8L-5 . s ....... III�. tit 51 ILI' 11 t i'li` ' 1 � Ili 1 qftH I1� P!1 e 1I i� tHti is\• g ill ' f !i ia w o o �e ti Q '" � � t jt! i !ill. 1 3 H 1iii tt'nhn, (....? Ilb -ii II I I:711 111 ,fjIl ri' if iib :14 i *i .cif z a; dill ' 1} 11 i1, 1lit' ,1111 ;I! 'fill! I11 ii1; i zi W 'a 5e;, i hull111111 � tj, lilt l1hl1h rt= EiIIi It �1 111111 4.18 ill I ii P. gill shh 2 I I E- I ' < 14////6- 1111111 - ¢ 4 x cI ,I I a sAS_ .41di;i � a_aa: II � 1 B ' ERRp 1 $ i 1 I RI g 1° II 1 Pi 1 I [...S'„ \ h ill II ¢ 1/ i ------I 'N\ �'.,,��; �. , ft i \ III! I I!! , I .'I!f: Ilr I --- R 1 � . I- - t�10 s1,Ino NMI r>.ww, 91.00s ' I. tit rgr x - ;ri jei 0 4.i k _f tsc a.tin p 4 1' i gild! ;<_f r- .8+ax. - �rt.c wel...^� Oe ew/x 1� 1\111 i -'7- t an I ., . . . *. IP!' 1 i 11411 II 111/j ,.., ,. .. ,, ,,, ,,,, _l ` r If 9.J I - ��T-�J - JJ 04 ill tit .y2 II` ; , I 1 1 rQ14L Vise - J •! ill I I/ III III I 1 e Ili _ / Avii —-- / . till 6 ill, I,; e i ' /G g -- / -'1 : 1f ; - Y---dJ re / ,Zl ,;1 ., . I j i rlyl ' At 1"14. ..--- / - I 11 , TT ' 11 4 1 ,/,/i A/I ,,ib I .: hh / / r 1/j ---� It I' / X�I/ '- / / Y /'•'J!/� i I/\ 14. , aas /1'it, \ / 12 s ", lit g I ' ci 1I 1 / w �'; j, ' j it 1 ri4 1-4, _ (...., , . , if ' . b. Arlan A./LI/LOON ----- / 8L-6 _ / 1:1 dfa-I" , City of Southlake,Texas (4100 MEMORANDUM October 6, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting continued to 10/10/95 1. Note there are three items remaining on the October 3. 1995 Regular City Council meeting agenda. These items, and my September 29, 1995 memo comments, are reprinted below. Agenda Item No. 8D. Ordinance No. 480-183. 1st Reading (ZA 95-88). Rezoning for 3.38 acres. Current zoning is AG. requested zoning is SF- 1B. Location is the west side of private street. Marantha Way. There have been no written responses related to this request. There are some unique circumstances regarding this request and similar requests on private streets which we will explain in executive session. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. Agenda Item No. 8F. ZA 95-90. Site Plan for an Office Complex for Dr. Timothy Huckabee. This is one of the projects which was approved during the development of the Corridor Overlay Zone. It has always been Dr. Huckabee's intent to meet the requirements of the overlay zone. The staff Site Plan Review Summary points out three problems(Nos.2,3,4)in meeting the corridor ordinance or the driveway ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that the plan as submitted, was the best that could be done given the circumstances of the lot, thus P/Z waived the two corridor requirements and directed staff to work out the configuration of the common L • Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest October 6, 1995 Page 2 access easement for the driveway. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 7-0. Agenda Item No. 8L. ZA 95-76. Preliminary Plat for Village Center. It is our understanding that Mr. Don Silverman will be attempting to meet with individual Councilmembers very soon. Recall at the meeting last Tuesday night, September 26 (the continuation of the September 19th meeting), that Mr. Silverman will not be available to meet October 3, however, he would be able to meet October 10. He has submitted a letter to this effect, included in your packet. We have scheduled him on this agenda knowing that we will need to continue the meeting to October 10 due to time constraints and length of the agenda. Mr. Silverman is aware of this. We have included in the packet the same material as previously forwarded, including a reduction of the same plat as previously discussed. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item 5-2. Also, we will need to go back in Executive Session prior to the end of the meeting if time allows. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 2. Update on Ft. Worth Racetrack Sewer Line Through Southlake. Note the attached memo from Bob Whitehead,Director of Public Works,concerning this issue. Unless the racetrack • Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest October 6, 1995 Page 3 developer wants to spend the money to speed the project up, there will be no sewer line constructed. The City of Ft. Worth has an alternative given the target race day. The memo explains what the alternative for Ft. Worth means for Southlake. 3. Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance,No. 480-Q. Attached is the latest draft, as approved by P&Z, of the ordinance. We are forwarding this now in order to give you additional time to review. Please call Karen Gandy, Greg Last, Tom Elgin, or me if you have any comments, questions, or concerns. This will be on your October 17 City Council meeting agenda. 4. Note the attached letter from Art Hobbs to Karen Gandy, City Council, and P&Z Commissioners concerning the proposed split of the P&Z. 5. Note the attached letter from Gary Hargett concerning the MTP development. Note particularly the comment concerning Greg Last. The comment is uncalled for and unfair at best. 6. Property at White Chapel and Bob Jones for Maintenance Facility. We have received several calls today from residents north and east of the proposed public works facility at this location. I have spoken today with Angela George at 435 Bob Jones Rd. and Donna Walker at 400 Brooks Ct. (Oaks Addition). They learned yesterday about the facility as proposed and strenuously object. They indicated they have spoken with the District Attorney at Denton County to seek advise on disannexation and how to boycott paying taxes if the City proceeds with the purchase of the property. They came into my office very upset and angry and determined to oppose the facility. They left still determined to oppose the facility but were neither angry nor upset. They wanted to know that if the City Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest October 6, 1995 Page 4 Council proceeds with the plans to acquire the property, whether or not the City would work with the surrounding neighbors on the bufferyards. I assured them that their input would be welcomed. Expect to hear from these two. I have also received a call from a Mr. Monty Sparks at 4520 Soda Ridge Rd. He did not leave a message other than to say "he would know when he called back." I will attempt to call him prior to leaving this afternoon. My guess is he is also calling about this property since Ms. George has indicated she is calling all her neighbors about this situation. 26( CEH/kb L City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-76 Review No: Four Date of Review: 10/10/95 Project Name: Preliminary Plat-Village Center.44.328 Ac. Thomas Mahan Survey Abst. # 1049 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: The Midland Development Group JBM Engineers & Planners 12655 Olive Boulevard. Westpark I. Suite 200 2630 W. Freeway. Suite 100 St. Louis. Missouri 63141 Fort Worth. Texas 76020 Phone: (214) 980-8806. (314) 576-1900 Phone: (817)429-7560 Fax : (214) 980-8789. (314) 576-7005 Fax : (817)429-9322 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/05/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Provide minimum center line radii of 600' feet for Village Center Drive. 2. Provide a 15'Drainage Easement around the main storm sewer trunk line crossing Lot 3,Block 1,and extend the easement to either the north or the east line of Lot 4, Block 1. 3. The building lines along the south lines of Lots 1 and 3,Block 1, and Lot 2,Block 2 adjacent to East Southlake Boulevard should be 50' from the dedicated right of way line. 4. The easements along the south lines of Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 2 adjacent to East Southlake Boulevard should be set 20' from the dedicated right of way line. * Lot 1,Block 1,Farrar Addition, Cabinet A, Slide 1539, P.R.T.C.T.,must be vacated before the final plat can be filed.A copy of the standard operating procedure for plat vacation has been forwarded to the applicant and engineer. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Midland Development Group, Attn: Donald Silverman JBM Engineers &Planners James Farrar, C/O Farrar Real Estate, 600 West Park Row,Arlington,Texas 76020 Phone: (817) 277-4411 G:\WPF\REV\95\95-076PP.WPD ---- •-•- a.ai.°o,as P +� PI a or�a as �+i°s��f �� tilaw �p � \\ i Q rim ' / r IantiP I I .e.t. " " I '- t _______I_______—»ar+.• -- 'ems / • i';'" il3 3 ,i .1 III " isr I A ---- / n.g s as 7,2-_ 1V/ e • �5; k ! ; ■ > ifc' ; //,1 - il i,� i I dr� `' _ rep 1/ rm !t ' L__ }- iiii r i /, te / ! i skl.`• 7 st 1 7— ,. ,ftz...k. ----;-,, /7/•' ii i / # i .i--e--,.. , "---- — —3.iso-A-ho.... , •• aktist,.. ... ,,2 ..,. I r,'I , __ 'I., am?mos rum 1 KC VOA Para a I i !:: + �; k * i iv `(f. L —1 ' _5 ,r'�ir ';' '' ��� INc '•� ill VI I *. i e .,s �;;l -. L--- A,. ,- ' 1;i P I I 1 ;, ;l . Ct . v 'k'II --- f;i i i t 4 7 =I��F y$FA PL.;o omit rarsic 11 _ _' _,_._ I ' ' I H� li:la 1111• 09 soot % leis ama O. II i t� M '1 lid. 1 : . ;l IsE. : , .I 1I" till --- 1 , i. I s ii F I It $ I .; 6 ,,xgll Coal. s�� ' _ ill iial�% z " " FFFF _FFFF i §x 11 filh��` I - I yII1V i C'' > FFFF F III 'III 19111 fill � � IJ11fl iliW F \�p. `tas M gel !spa: 1 '14 ii i IV 142 I— P.. A 111 lif .t• .1111 I self I 114,1 Intii III ilt III 'Isgl tILE II!!t 111111 I1tli kaEg Lif MI e...1 ; I /.77:fi's Vi G c:' t-• i G r� t .i iiIt !i ;qr 1iI(IIii 'I! - • 401 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM G` October 5, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager D' FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Fort Worth (Racetrack) Sewer Line Through Southlake Friday, September 15, 1995, at the Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Advisory Board meeting, Fort Worth reported that they have decided pot to build the sanitary sewer system through Southlake, which would serve the new track. Instead, Fort Worth and TRA have agreed to the following: 1. The City of Fort Worth shall fully fund 90% of the cost of an equalization basin sufficient to limit plant flows to no more than 0.5 MGD resulting from the NASCAR racing facility. Upon completion of construction, operation and maintenance responsibilities and the rights to its use and output will be conveyed to the system (Denton Creek Wastewater System). 2. The City of Fort Worth shall not be granted a point of entry nor allowed to connect to the system to serve the NASCAR racing facility until the equalization basin and plant expansion to an interim capacity of 1.68 MGD are completed. Note: The equalization basin and plant expansion are scheduled to be completed in November 1996. Fort Worth accepts the risk if the construction is not completed. Therefore, there will be nQ races until at least November 1996. 3. The City of Fort Worth's minimum wastewater flow for the purposes of system cost allocation shall be as follows: (Fiscal year begins Dec. 1st.) FY 1997 1.147 MGD, average daily flow FY 1998 1.199 MGD, average daily flow FY 1999 1.256 MGD, average daily flow For all the years beyond 1999, Fort Worth's minimum flows shall be 1.256 MGD, average daily flow. Additional Information: TRA's Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant has a design flow of 0.800 MGD. The plant (seCurtis E. Hawk, City Manager Fort Worth (Race Track) Sewer Line September 18, 1995 Page 2. is currently at the point where it needs to be expanded to 1.68 MGD. TRA has awarded an engineering contract for the design. Southlake's projected annual costs based upon our anticipated flows are shown on the attached as "scenario 1" (This is for a 1.68 MGD plant without the race track). With the above proposed agreement with Fort Worth, Southlake's costs for a 2.5 MGD plant would be as shown in "scenario 2." TRA has structured the capital-debt service, and operation and maintenance so that over five years (1997-2001) each entity other than Fort Worth has reduced costs. Southlake would "save a total of$27,127 over the five year interval. [Total is the difference between scenario's 1 and 2.] BW/sm (ire wpdocs\wthead.mem\racetrac.wpd L ` 15-Sep-95 DENTON CREEK REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM (16.0,..;URRENT FLOW PROJECTIONS + NEW SOURCES + 0.08 MGD RACETRACK FLOW 0.200 MGD SURCHARGE +0.08 & 0.20 MGD ADDED IN 1997 - 1999. NO INCREASE IN FLOW 2000 & 2001 (FW). 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 ROANOKE SCENARIO 2 2.5 MGD $309,839 $255,971 $258,155 $258,062 $262,135 $268,248 1 SCENARIO 1 1.68 MGD 309,839 250,291 270,616 268,231 261,559 300,766 VARIANCE $0 $5,680 ($12,461) ($10,169) $576 ($32,518) 1HASLET SCENARIO 2 2.5 MGD $86,755 $70,884 $70,754 $70,045 $70,505 $71,533 f SCENARIO 1 1.68 MGD 86.755 69,311 74,169 72,806 70,350 80.204I {I VARIANCE $0 $1,573 ($3,415) ($2,760) $155 ($8,671 yl I FORT WORTH SCENARIO 2 2.5 MGD $570,104 $1,129,225 $1,146,399 $1,157,592 $1,135,316 $1,123,067 SCENARIO 1 1.68 MGD 570,104 834,625 921,097 934,976 937,101 1,098,799 VARIANCE $0 $294,600 $225,301 $222,616 $198,214 $24,268 SOUTHLAKE SCENARIO 2 2.5 MGD $37,181 $29,535 $57,368 $92,165 $135,587 $178,832 SCENARIO 1 1.68 MGD 37,181 28,880 60,137 95,797 135,289 200,511 II VARIANCE $0 $655 ($2,769) ($3,632) $298 ($21,6791 TILT MUD 1 SCENARIO 2 2.5 MGD $1,239 $985 $956 $922 $904 $894 SCENARIO 1 1.68 MGD 1,239 963 1,002 958 902 1,003 VARIANCE $0 $22 ($46) ($36) $2 ($108 (11 ELLER SCENARIO 2 2.5 MGD $37,181 $29,535 $28,684 $27,649 $27,117 $26,825 SCENARIO 1 1.68 MGD 37,181 28,880 30,068 28,739 27,058 30,077 VARIANCE $0 $655 ($1,385) ($1,090) $60 ($3,252 LTMUD3 SCENARIO 2 2.5 MGD $37,181 $29,535 $28,684 $27,649 $27,117 $26,825 SCENARIO 1 1.68 MGD 37,181 28,880 30,068 28,739 27,058 30,077� ,, VARIANCE $0 $655 ($1,385) ($1,090) $60 ($3,252 1 'ROJCO City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM October 5, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: First Reading,Ordinance No. 480-Q Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance Draft No. 9a Attached is the Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance(Ordinance No.480-Q),as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission with an affirmative vote of(7-0), that will be forwarded to City Council for consideration on the October 17 City Council meeting agenda. The purpose of this revision is to preserve and protect existing and planned residential neighborhoods within the City from the possible adverse impact of business and commercial uses developing adjacent to the neighborhoods. Adoption of this revision would establish special neighborhood preservation development regulations such that non-single family development is compatible and complementary with adjoining single family residential properties. These regulations are in addition to those in the underlying zoning district for the non-single family residential use. Following is an executive summary of the proposed regulations: • APPLICABILITY: All non-single family residential properties which adjoin or are within 400' of single family residential property(known as the control distance). • MASONRY REQUIREMENTS: All structures shall have an exterior finish of brick or natural stone covering a minimum of eighty percent(80%) of the area of each facade,excluding doors and windows. • HEIGHT: All structures shall not exceed the maximum height permitted in the"SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. • EXTERIOR LIGHTING: The exterior lighting shall operate in such a manner as to ensure that lighting patterns are directed onto the non-single family residential property and do not directly project onto adjacent single family residential property. • TRASH RECEPTACLES: No trash receptacles shall be allowed within fifty feet (50') of single family residential property. All structures under this section shall construct masonry screening walls around all trash receptacles. Screening walls shall be four-sided with a gate and (iiiii, shall be a minimum height of eight feet(8'). City of Southlake,Texas (tie • PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: • Developments shall ensure that the disposal of and collection of solid waste,trash and other refuse into trash receptacles or dumpsters does not occur between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. • Developments shall ensure that deliveries made by vehicles exceeding 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(G.V.W.) shall not be received nor dispatched between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. • ROOF REQUIREMENTS: The roof systems of all structures shall be of the same type(e.g., gable,hip, shed)and the same pitch(e.g., 6:12, 8:12, 10:12),and clad of the same materials that are found on the majority of single family residential properties lying within the control distance. • If the roof system exceeds the maximum permitted height,a mansard roof system may be utilized if it is enclosed on all sides and that the pitch,height and cladding of the mansard roof is compatible with the roof systems on the majority of single family residential properties within the control distance. • Insufficient Comparisons Available: The roof systems of all structures shall be gable or hip with 6:12 minimum pitch and clad with composition shingles,slate or a man-made slate-like product. If the roof system exceeds the maximum permitted height, a mansard roof system (enclosed on all sides)may be utilized provided that the mansard roof have a pitch between 6:12 and 10:12, a minimum height of twenty-five feet (25') and is clad with composition shingles, slate or a man-made slate-like product. • LOCATION: If the structure to be regulated is located on the same street as single family residential property and if single family residential property is within the control distance,the following shall be required: • Front and Side Yards: The regulated structure shall have front and side yards equivalent to the front and side yards required for the single family residential property,but not less than the front and side yards as required by the underlying zoning district of the regulated structure. • Parking Limitations: If the regulated structure is oriented the same as the single family residential property,no vehicular parking shall be permitted in the area which comprises the front yard of the non-single family residential structure. • Display of Merchandise: If the regulated structure is oriented the same as the single family residential property,the regulated structure shall not display sales merchandise in windows visible from single family residential properties. (sr • Window and Door Requirements: All structures shall have window (e.g., single-hung, double-hung,casement,awning...)and door(e.g.,flush,paneled,french...) structures similar City of Southlake,Texas to those that are found on the majority of single family residential property lying within the control distance. • Insufficient Comparisons Available: The window structures shall be single-hung, double-hung,casement or awning,and door structures shall be flush,paneled or french. • MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: All buildings must be designed such that no roof-mounted mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes in excess of eighteen inches (18") shall be visible(as defined herein). Ground-mounted mechanical equipment and satellite dishes in excess of eighteen inches (18") shall be screened by a wooden or masonry fence or by landscaping material to a height one foot higher than the object being screened. • VARIANCES AND APPEALS: At the time of review of any required Concept Plan or Site Plan, the City Council may grant variances to the neighborhood preservation development regulations if the applicant can meet certain criteria. The City Council may grant a variance by an affirmative vote of a majority of the City Council members present and voting on the matter. If a variance application is denied by the City Council,no other variance of like kind relating to the same project or proposed project shall be considered or acted upon by the City Council for a period of six(6)months subsequent to the denial. • CONFLICTING REGULATIONS: The neighborhood preservation development standards shall supersede any other provision established by the zoning ordinance or other ordinances, except that when conflicting requirements are found,the more stringent requirements shall apply. However, the following exception shall apply: Corridor Overlay Zone requirements found in Section 43 shall take precedence if there are conflicting standards with these regulations. If you have any questions pertaining to the proposed ordinance, feel free to contact me at extension 743. ./k KPG DRAFT 9a October 5, 1995 1 ORDINANCE NO. 480-Q 2 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS 4 AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE 5 OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, CREATING 6 NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION SPECIAL 7 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL 8 DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS; 9 PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE 10 CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A 11 SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY 12 FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS 13 CLAUSE;PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET 14 FORM;PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL 15 NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 16 17 WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas, is a home rule city acting under its charter 18 adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 19 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS,the City of Southlake has heretofore adopted Ordinance No.480,as amended, 22 as the zoning ordinance of the city; and 23 24 WHEREAS,the City of Southlake has historically developed as a residential community 25 which is particularly suited for the development of a quality residential lifestyle which is separated 26 from non-residential developments which might adversely impact said residential neighborhoods; 27 and 28 29 WHEREAS, several existing and planned residential neighborhoods are located adjacent to 30 properties which are developing or will be developed for business and commercial use; and 31 32 WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Southlake recognizes the vital importance of 33 residential neighborhoods and the need to preserve and protect residential neighborhoods from the 34 adverse effects of adjoining non-single family residential uses; and 35 36 WHEREAS,the city council desires to protect and enhance the attractiveness of the city to 37 visitors; to promote and stimulate the economy; to ensure the harmonious, orderly and efficient 38 growth and development of the city; to preserve property and property values; and to maintain a 39 generally harmonious outward appearance of both single family residential and non-single family 40 residential structures which are compatible and complementary; and G:IORDWEIGHBORIDFI'9A.CLN • • DRAFT 9a October 5, 1995 1 WHEREAS,the city council desires to adopt this ordinance for the purpose of preserving 2 and protecting the quality of residential life of existing and future residential neighborhoods by 3 adopting reasonable regulations that will promote non-residential development that is compatible 4 and complementary with adjoining single family residential properties. 5 6 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 7 OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: 8 9 SECTION 1. 10 11 Ordinance No.480,as amended, is hereby amended by adding new section 8.6, 16.6, 17.6, 12 18.6, 19.4,20.6,21.6,22.6,23.6,24.6,25.6,26.6,27.6,28.6,29.6, 30.6, 31.4 and 32.4 respectively, 13 and by renumbering the remaining sections accordingly: 14 15 "ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR PROPERTIES LYING 16 WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED FEET(400') OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 17 PROPERTY" - In addition to the development regulations applicable to this district, 18 the development regulations established in Section 37 of the Zoning Ordinance No. 19 480, as amended, shall also apply. Ordinance No.480, as amended, is hereby amended by adding new Section 37, as follows: 22 23 SECTION 37 24 NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 25 26 37.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT - In order to preserve and protect significant 27 architectural and cultural attributes of the City of Southlake, the City has 28 determined that it is necessary and appropriate to adopt specialized 29 regulations to prevent any detrimental impact from the location of non-single 30 family residential uses in proximity to single family residential uses. 31 32 It is the intent of this Section that the development standards set forth herein 33 shall supersede any other provision established by this ordinance or other 34 ordinances, except that when conflicting requirements are found, the more 35 stringent requirements shall apply. However,the following exception shall 36 apply: Corridor Overlay Zone requirements found in Section 43 shall take 37 precedence if there are conflicting standards in this section. 38 39 37.2 DEFINITIONS-The following definitions shall be applicable to this section. 40 Architectural Attributes: Means those physical features of buildings and structures that are generally identified and described as being important PAGE 2 G:IORDWEIGHBORIDFT9A.CLN DRAFT 9a October 5, 1995 1 products of human thought and action characteristic of a population or 2 community. 3 4 Cultural Attributes. Means all of those physical features of an area that, 5 either independently or by virtue of their interrelationship, are generally 6 identified and described as being important products of human thought and 7 action characteristic of a population or community. Accordingly, the term 8 "cultural attributes"necessarily includes"architectural attributes"as that term 9 is defined in this section. The term"cultural attributes" does not refer to the 10 characteristics or beliefs of people who may reside in or frequent a particular 11 area. 12 13 Single Family Residential Property: Means any lot or tract of land upon 14 which a single family residential home exists or any lot or tract of land with 15 single family residential zoning or any lot or tract of land designated as low 16 or medium density residential on the Land Use Plan. 17 18 Under Construction: Means that a valid build permit has been issued by the 19 City for construction of a single family residential dwelling. Visible: Means that the object(s) being screened can be seen from any 2 elevation equal to the grade which is defined as the lowest point of elevation 23 of the finished surface of the ground,paving or sidewalk when measured on 24 a line five feet(5')from the building. 25 26 37.3 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: In addition to the development 27 regulations applicable to the underlying district, the following additional 28 development regulations shall apply to all developing properties lying within 29 four hundred feet(400')of single family residential property measured from 30 the property line of the non-single family residential use, hereinafter known 31 as the "control distance." 32 33 1. Exterior Finish: All structures shall have an exterior finish of brick or 34 natural stone covering a minimum of eighty percent(80%) of the area 35 of each facade, excluding doors and windows. 36 37 2. Maximum Height: All structures shall not exceed the maximum height 38 permitted in the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. 39 40 41 PAGE 3 G:IORDWEIGHBORIDFT9A.CLN • DRAFT 9a October 5, 1995 1 3. Exterior Lighting: The exterior lighting shall operate in such a manner 2 as to ensure that lighting patterns are directed onto the non-single family 3 residential property and do not directly project onto adjacent single 4 family residential property. 5 6 4. Trash Receptacles: No trash receptacles shall be allowed within fifty 7 feet(50')of single family residential property. All structures under this 8 section shall construct masonry screening walls around all trash 9 receptacles. Screening walls shall be four-sided with a gate and shall be 10 a minimum height of eight feet(8'). 11 12 5. Performance Standards: 13 14 a. Developments shall ensure that the disposal of and collection of 15 solid waste, trash and other refuse into trash receptacles or 16 dumpsters does not occur between the hours of 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 17 a.m. 18 19 b. Developments shall ensure that deliveries made by vehicles exceeding 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(G.V.W.) shall not be received nor dispatched between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 22 7:00 a.m. 23 24 6. Roof Requirements: The roof systems of all structures shall be of the 25 same type (e.g., gable, hip, shed) and the same pitch(e.g., 6:12, 8:12, 26 10:12),and clad of the same materials that are found on the majority of 27 single family residential properties lying within the control distance. 28 In the event that such a roof system would cause the height of the 29 structure to exceed the maximum height as permitted, a mansard roof 30 system may be utilized provided that the mansard roof is enclosed on all 31 sides and that the pitch, height and cladding of the mansard roof is 32 compatible with the roof systems on the majority of single family 33 residential properties within the control distance. On single-story 34 structures,the highest point of the mansard roof(using the measurement 35 method established by the currently adopted Uniform Building Code) 36 shall meet the height of the majority of single-story single family 37 dwellings within the control distance. On multiple story structures,the 38 highest point of the mansard roof (using the measurement method 39 established by the currently adopted Uniform Building Code)shall meet 40 the height of the majority of multiple story single family dwellings t within the control distance. PAGE 4 G:IORDINEIGHBORIDFT9A.CLN DRAFT 9a (p. October 5, 1995 1 a. Insufficient Comparisons Available: In the event that single family 2 residential property within the control distance contains fewer than 3 three (3) residences existing or under construction or in the event 4 that there is no majority of style of single family residential 5 property within the control distance, the roof systems of all 6 structures subject to this regulation shall be gable or hip with 6:12 7 minimum pitch and clad with composition shingles,slate or a man- 8 made slate-like product. In the event that such a roof system 9 would cause the height of the structure to exceed the maximum 10 height as permitted, a mansard roof system(enclosed on all sides) 11 may be utilized provided that the mansard roof have a pitch 12 between 6:12 and 10:12,a minimum height of twenty-five feet(25') 13 and is clad with composition shingles, slate or a man-made slate- 14 like product. 15 16 7. Location: If the structure to be regulated is located on the same street 17 as single family residential property and if single family residential 18 property is within the control distance,the following shall be required: 19 (ire a. Front and Side Yards: The regulated structure shall have front and side yards equivalent to the front and side yards required for the 22 single family residential property, but not less than the front and 23 side yards as required by the underlying zoning district of the 24 regulated structure. 25 26 b. Parking Limitations: If the regulated structure is oriented the same 27 as the single family residential property,no vehicular parking shall 28 be permitted in the area which comprises the front yard of the non- 29 single family residential structure. 30 31 c. Display of Merchandise: If the regulated structure is oriented the 32 same as the single family residential property, the regulated 33 structure shall not display sales merchandise in windows visible 34 from single family residential properties. 35 36 d. Window and Door Requirements: All structures shall have 37 window(e.g., single-hung,double-hung,casement, awning...) and 38 door(e.g.,flush,paneled, french...) structures similar to those that 39 are found on the majority of single family residential property lying 40 within the control distance. PAGE 5 G:IORDWEIGHBORIDF7'9A.CLN DRAFT 9a October 5, 1995 1 1. Insufficient Comparisons Available: In the event that single 2 family residential property within the control distance 3 contains fewer than three (3) residences existing or under 4 construction or in the event that there is no majority of style of 5 single family property within the control distance, window 6 structures shall be single-hung, double-hung, casement or 7 awning,and door structures shall be flush,paneled or french. 8 9 8. Mechanical Equipment Screening: All buildings must be designed such 10 that no roof-mounted mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite 11 dishes in excess of eighteen inches (18") shall be visible (as defined 12 herein). Ground-mounted mechanical equipment and satellite dishes in 13 excess of eighteen inches (18") shall be screened by a wooden or 14 masonry fence or by landscaping material to a height one foot higher 15 than the object being screened. 16 17 37.4 VARIANCES AND APPEALS: At the time of review of any required 18 Concept Plan or Site Plan, the City Council may grant variances to the 19 development regulations set forth in this Section. 1. To receive a variance,the applicant must demonstrate the following: 22 23 (a) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding 24 residential properties; 25 26 (b) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural 27 design or creativity of the project; 28 29 (c) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding 30 developed properties; or 31 32 (d) The proposed construction is an addition to an existing project that 33 does not meet the requirements of this ordinance. 34 35 2. The City Council may grant a variance by an affirmative vote of a 36 majority of the City Council members present and voting on the matter. 37 In order to grant a variance, the City Council must determine that a 38 literal enforcement of the regulations will create an unnecessary 39 hardship or a practical difficulty for the applicant; that the situation 40 causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property; that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent PAGE 6 G:IORDINEIGHBORIDFI'9A.CLN DRAFT 9a (bw, October 5, 1995 1 properties; and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with 2 the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. 3 4 3. If a variance application is denied by the City Council,no other variance 5 of like kind relating to the same project or proposed project shall be 6 considered or acted upon by the City Council for a period of six (6) 7 months subsequent to the denial. 8 9 SECTION 2. 10 11 This ordinance shall be cumulative or all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, 12 Texas,except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such 13 ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. 14 15 SECTION 3. 16 17 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, 18 sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, 19 sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid L judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since 22 the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance 23 of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence,paragraph or section. 24 25 SECTION 4. 26 27 Any person,firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects or refuses to comply 28 with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more 29 than Two Thousand Dollars($2,000.00)for each offense. Each day that a violation if permitted to 30 exist shall constitute a separate offense. 31 32 SECTION 5. 33 34 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all 35 violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting 36 zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance;and,as to such accrued 37 violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not,under 38 such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final 39 disposition by the courts. 40 PAGE 7 G:IORDWEIGHBORIDFT9A.CLN DRAFT 9a October 5, 1995 1 SECTION 6. 2 3 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance 4 in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public,and the operative provisions of 5 this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than 6 the production thereof. 7 8 SECTION 7. 9 10 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed 11 ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public 12 hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this 13 ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of 14 its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and 15 penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance,as 16 required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. 17 18 SECTION 8. 19 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 29 , 1995. 30 31 32 33 MAYOR 34 35 36 ATTEST: 37 38 39 40 CITY SECRETARY PAGE 8 G:IORDWEIGHBORIDFT9A.CLN DRAFT 9a October 5, 1995 1 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 2 , 1995. 3 4 5 6 MAYOR 7 8 9 ATTEST: 10 11 12 13 CITY SECRETARY 14 15 16 EFFECTIVE: 17 18 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 19 CITY ATTORNEY L G:\ORD\NEIGHBOR\DFT9A.CLN PAGE 9 October 4, 1995 To: Karen Gandy, City Council and Planning &Zoning Commissioners From: Arthur Hobbs, Jr. Re: Proposed split of Southlake Planning&Zoning Commission With the formation of a committee to study the possibility of a split in the current Planning& Zoning commission,I find myself with many questions and concerns. What is the mission or objective to be achieved in a split? In other words, what will be accomplished? Is this an effort to keep a campaign promise or a sound business decision in the best interest of the City? Will the governmental process become more streamlined or more cumbersome. In my opinion it is essential that the objective(s) first be determined, all options be identified and the pros and cons of each be thoroughly investigated and debated. I believe that the investigative process should at least include: 1. An opinion from the Texas cities that have adopted such a split. To my knowledge there are only four. 2. An opinion from cities that have considered such a plan and rejected it. What were the reasons for rejection? 3. The opinion of the City Attorney, Alan Taylor. He is very familiar with a split structure as it exists in the City of Fort Worth. 4. The opinion and advice of Graig N. Farmer, AICP,Director of Planning and Special Projects of the City of Grand Prairie. He is an expert in developing planning and zoning capabilities in small-to-medium sized,rapid growth cities. He was involved in the development of comprehensive plans and development codes that have won five (5) Texas American Planning Association Merit Awards. 5. A view from the Texas academic research master's thesis. 6. A time management study to identify exactly how much time is spent on the planning process. (ordinance draft, master plan, platting). Could the objective be met by adding one additional monthly P&Z meeting devoted entirely to the planning process? 7. The cost of resource allocation in terms of staff, training, meeting place and time. C • • COPY October 4, 1995 ✓ ,. CITY SECRETAR rw- TO: Mayor Gary Fickes and all Southlake councilmembers From: Gary Hargett Hats-Off to you for a good job on the MTP development proposal ! It is very reassuring to know that the concerns and voices of residents are reflected in your decision making. Council member Richarme requested feed-back on the outcome. Speaking for myself and the handful of residents that reviewed the recommendation, I would say the right decision for Southlake was made. As the review evolved, one thing became apparent - MTP had not accorately represented the request. At present there is no need for residential rental because they do not have any commercial requirement. It was a very positive and objective process to observe the council exploring all the components. On balance the decision is one that is fair to MTP, good for Southlake and acceptable to residents. In closing, two items that need mentioning are: 1. P & Z needs to be more sensitive to residents interests 2. after approval , there needs to be some guarantee Greg Last will not allow developer changes that will diminish the concept and concerns you approve Thanks again for accepting the challenge and coming to a fair decision. Sincerely, Gary Hargett L City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-183, First Reading ZA 95-88, Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 3.38 acres situated in the William H. Martin Survey, Abstract 1068, Tracts 2A3 &2A3A1 LOCATION: West side of the private street, Marantha Way, approxu" iateTS 1`,200 feet North of Randol Mill Avenue OWNER/APPLICANT: Lawrence L. Post CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District TEQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District - (This district permits a 1,500 s.f. home.) LAND USE CATEGORY: Low-Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995,Approved(7-0), rezoning of ZA 95-88 to "SF-1B" STAFF COMMENTS: No plat has been submitted for this property; therefore, Staff does not know if the property will be subdivided prior to development. KPG/ls G:\W PF\MEMO\CASES95\95-88Z.1 CC 8D-1 + . J Cam`i :r� „. . (ROANOKE D. . L1 j \ • \ -- j' ) 1 4 4 J/ N - - 4A1 40, ..) ( 1 t I ( i i I I " 1 I 1� i I , 3Bz _ riDi . . iIL TOI g1L!- SU/RYEY A-1068 a:,zw�,i , je. 1 i 10.15 Ac • 3 < 5Ac 15 2C5 2C6 2C ',4!,,12 2C11 2C1 5 ' 12 11 s A : . • n 2A5 2C4 2C 2C " t r r�ir,..„i : ii.� ��f g 10 '. 1: 2B2 C 282A, 72 i r,.triF1�O ip-i'ti ' 1 -L 261: � .H•" A f, rEE ' • ' .. • i�7^ INN i i 5 g SL/RVEY A—/ 1 .;; � •1�7#0•=-• ' ]�1K p►l1 1 J� i • i tA1 j ;g 1A6 p)� �. L d2 1 g 1A1 1A7 1f 1E --•- A • c • 1 i 11 I 9 a J1.,.__.....1 -- .1 ' - � i • i WESTLAKE CITY LIMIT tct 1G5 1H -1f ::II ._._i ._.. KELLER CITY LIMIT . ii • 1 { J0HN CH ' 1E2 102 j i 1G3 , I a lyt-r - 6070 ' i , ' j ! j j 60 1 1E � 1G4 t . •. FalEST +► . ' 1C I i i i i 1-..--. i i i I 2A1 •y% L/ L'' .t 4/1)6A2A --. ---'�'4- . • .r6n 1 .! - i iqiipp. ! .; \ %. .. ,o,.. ,. .... • ( i 5 L . . . ,. , ,....„),, . , , , %. i t• i • -1- I TRACT MAP ^'I SURREY A-1604 ♦II i V21:p j ! ! 1 1 i i•_._. _ :1 : 82 1A1A1 1 __ i (kr — — — - -- � '.. ADJACENT OWNERS 2 A A AND ZONING I • / / / i Spin #12 Representative . R. Strand David Baltimore 1 2 C 5 2C „AG„ -..._ • ---- ....___ . , _,_ .„..,, lw- . .. iii 2A5 2C7 2C - „AG„L., : 232 „ z B. Phillips "AG" P. Pruitt L 2 E A "AG Town of Westlake ip N- - 2 A Z- - - 1A10 if "AG" 1 . G. Wiggins AG I — Nj (r) v V 0 _ ;: 5 SUR VI- Y A - 16 6 0 1A3 1A 1J 0 5C 1A ri 12 ( + 1A1 5A 1A6 , ? \ i \- i -IA2 1 ° 1A1 1A7 1F 1 [ 11 8D-3 • i _ I A ^ n (pe CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-183 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS.:BEING ff T "l068 >. ':: >A3ii`:::: '::`:3N« AND MORE FULLY :::::::..:::::::..::..........:: AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" RO : A 'F EIAL >< I ' tC , SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;-` DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; (lbe PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and ............................................. ............................................. WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as AG' Ag i t € tunder the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the O:\ORD\CASES\480-183.1RD Page 1 8D-4 facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, (Iire WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,'panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed Le and amended as shown and described below: G:1ORD\CASES1480-183.1 R D Page 2 8D-5 B 'em acr�..�.$ e tr act of 1 and sit uated in :::.�::::::� :.:�:;;:.::.;:. ........ the iOly:::: <:>;Motix�<iSuoo: otom ikmac and more fully and:completely,described m Exhibit A w:i1>':iiYii:::>:::i':::i:i:::: }.;.l4ii}}}: attached hereto and incor orated herein from A' . gO.O ti"i : riet: :ltS::-:::B Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting theTealth, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration (pay, among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, G:\ORD\CASES\480-183.1 RD Page 3 8D-6 under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of MAYOR Coe ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Cie G:\ORD\CASES\480-183.1 RD Page 4 8D-7 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY (Be APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G\OR D\CASES\480-183.1 R D Page 5 8D-8 EXHIBIT "A" Lie BEGINNING at an iron, pin found in the occupied West line of said Martin Survey , said point being , . the Northwest corner of a tract described in a deed from Blease Tibbets , Trustee , to Susan Post of record in Volume 6669 , Page 832 , Deed Records , Tarrant County , Texas , said point also being the Southwest corner and POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract ; THENCE North 368 ..75 feet to an iron pin for corner ; • THENCE N . 88° - 51 ' E . 378 . 67 feet to an iron pin for corner in a gravel road ; THENCE S . 6° - 34 ' E . 370. 33 feet to an iron pin for corner ; • THENCE S . 88° - 51 ' W . at- 35 . 60 feet passing an iron pin found in the Westerly line of said gravel road and continuing (111w' in all 421 .0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 3 . 38 acres , of which 0. 26 acres are in road easement leaving 3 . 12 net acres . • L O:1ORDICASES1480-163.1RD , Page 6 • 8D-9 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-90, Site Plan/Office Complex REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for an Office Complex, being Lot 6, Hiram Granberry No. 581 Addition, and being further described as 0.908 acres situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey,Abstract No. 581 LOCATION: South side of Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) approximately 80' West of the entrance to Lake Crest Addition ~' OWNER/APPLICANT: Dr. Timothy Huckabee CURRENT ZONING: "0-1" Office District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: One (1)written response received within the 200' notification area: • Dan Altena, 103 Springbrook Court, Southlake, Texas 76092-7727, undecided, "We are not sure how the adjacent land will be used. If it will also be 0-1, we request that a fence be included and the appropriate landscaping/space between the office(s)and adjacent homes be required." P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995; Approved(7-0), subject to the Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated September 15, 1995, deleting item#11 (side yard setback on the West required by the corridor overlay zone)and item#14(interior landscape in the parking island required by the corridor overlay zone)and working with staff to determine the best location of the common access easement shown in the northwest corner. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the comments of Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated September 15, 1995 with the exception of those items addressed in Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated September 29, 1995.` Although the applicant began the development process prior to the adoption 0,g of the Corridor Study, he has previously stated that it is his intention to comply with the corridor overlay zone requirements. KPG/ls 8F-1 7r ,,... v. 1 .,:6O Dl `, 1', -i Yam` r •` CO"I.wr 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 d ` .. � i '., '\J.,Lr.TLI- -. I r Y'', 1 i i l i 1 i i i i 1 1 1 1 . i i1L.r ' i y N • i qR� Y \ I w limit . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• , 1 r/ T '' h'L.-="-�' �, 11A2A IA 9 , i 1 1 , nAz i ar^F 0� eimmemammi-L. A'i r �i- 1 I i _ir�,L 7"ILT-1EA / l/ - - Ia ` r _.}..a` I h'l7,i. 7-s,1' ,-( I. I. 1 i 1 1 I i ammi1 __ _ .. :' -f- ..' -.7'-1- , , 3E I iAL, K - +,/ ! � �i.:.:: �, ` c' '` `( ICt.•, •r.YTil'� __ 3A IV= T:; -- _ - -F_ I''-f/�,�- -F , 1isi / �y1_�.� .1I.L1� `� � i`,,3..;'r'!� `_ i 1 , }-'W 1 '1A1 `, _ .:•�a�:�r.,:YYY„ - = r � 1 �`1`�� N ' I .• 91,In i 1 ' ` • i . . I 3A1 1 1 i 1 ` ' r r • `y 1 _ -�.` `L r ►ur:•.0 'u,•.f.D _., c 3.41A ALL , 1 1 I t �v , , i r p ' ,i of i i I 1 i i 1' 1 1 1 1 1 i L1 T T L E"R ireU a LALL III gICEN. NNIA RK i + , ,j11 ', 6' . `Y I1.r 3JIA 3H ]9,A PA 1 , , , , , , 1 , ' I i ��✓✓-- 381 1HINY� -- - , r 1 ' 171 3818 G pi! ram ' .. p. 6 �'� ' , , �- , N >T1pN y -.- �© © ADD `r • -- E511 dllhL, , a 19 3.5 At 5 3J1 "EST fa TRACT aw, '` , 1 gill 'L , $ .� , 12e 262 I ' h ,, /AA t x sc i 5F 5E xi 3C2 / 's w PO- . 1Si ,ok ak • ,. Y7. , i _ , +�`, ,.,. _ L_ i / ., a M ,co . ,,,,1 , ^ ,.. •„� L f I�!. _ i x ,$4111 Y 12A1C 2AIT 10I zAs '...3...2,-1--2-.„\., 44441i6 21"(: �' TLT4't(it,', .r.^�] ---.jpj�l� _ .V•• 4.23 Ac . 140 , 7l't y, l`i:•'r ' A15.. ..[COURT u T •\,1....- -,...-,_--•-:;- -,-.,....,./%r.,•...,t.) t- -....T,_,.„.„.i 1. ,,, ,Y • 1 EI . l tr '..' -,c• r'-..„: 1 , . . -i 101 1 , G 291 /rV 2e 283A 293C , _; , }-i > \ firo 5k w WHIT ,k eU' ,c '€ 2A 7 ,4 -1,.. i, -Ipti fl♦I� ,s Ac I 2C 3• 2C�_ ,_ 1 •�`riimo �IIG�G�UvI �G�I��nIB f=G�G��7 GNA� , ,"� 30 Ac �j •��=,��� _ SURVEY A-501 ,w' - L ! "'' i, 2 _ ADD 1, I Ac T L... , ..•..i.,..r ' '.'/) 6k ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- /NEI 7. 50 S0 ,a,.• r ii - • .g , ' 1. 01 -I -rct4 L_ " PARK 4 k ' ' ' IC 1E1A P'.41. HYDE 4440 5121 s , , I ‘ Al , , •- , ..' I AlJ •r r - i 1 {� I ' -- 1 . i , 'M 1 -T- IAt I 1 A v '�r�� Sy �� - _ -. A 1 Udj�.r • �! .Fil® 1A 19: / _ trrQ.�, / 11 f+'1 - o..� -- - -- — - , ' .:�,•�...,cis 1 _... ® NEST OONIMIEdTA1 1W TiH ' I' i [•y _ 1 . i' •, 1 1 1 1 1 1 `., 1 �— ♦j 3C 11,11, 4. ., 1A ��`4`r ,• Eyre TRACT MAP :,i i AL s�A1E� Ill _ •Pp. , 01/1'~ 8F-2 r_ - . ‘HALL p (�(7(� 1 a �� I a[/ • �' h-y_�_ r _r W/�1�L: INUIS� 1 a - �•� h '�--i /- r_ -1_ • _ / 23.5 Ac 32.95 Ac• I ` _:J1 .1 i7 _... - _ Ir- 1 , �.: SUR 1fr A-10 1 1 ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING L I v O I(>---c_2 7_,....,,,,, 7 El ) 3 3 4 A Southlake Four= c______� 3C 3[ Investment • FM 1709-Shady Oaks Ltd. 1 I / State of Texas C Pierce '� 2 C 2 /� A �VI . Homes ,l I 7LakHeoCAr st\ tJ�. ,. )z-T-1 . — -I_ . . -- :) D. Altena / /\ 0 Southlake �� J.V. M. Kennedy Pulte �� y Homes - 3 __b qb T. Jacobowski C) • — _ Pulte Homes �c 1 •i G • Spin #14 Representative 70 B Karen Cienki CT /D — . _ - --\ \ . .) . 2 . , • 1 \ s . fl _ . _ . �• -� 15 v - )17 + ill . . -r- — . \: s , , \,‹E\-\0 . _ • __, 1 -- --2,-\-- 1— _— . — • • . • — —{ r '' I _ CADDO LACE + / s 8F-3 r- � i I) \ • City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 95-90 Review No: Two Date of Review:9/29/95 Project Name: Site Plan - Lot 6, Hiram Granberry No. 581 Addition, 0.908 acres situated in the H. Granberry Survey,Abstract No. 581 OWNER/APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Timothy Huckabee Huckabee&Associates. Inc. 2000 E. Highway 114 P.O. Drawer 611 Southlake. Texas 76092 Stephenville, Texas 76401 Phone: (817) 329-4746 Phone: (817) 968-5588 Fax : (817)481-9793 Fax: (817) 968-5668 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/25/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY( OES'I'1`ONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787.CITY 1. Correct the discrepancies in the floor areas shown on the graphic, the Site Data Summary, and the Building Design Criteria. 2. Ordinance 480-S (Corridor Overlay Zone) requires that non-residential buildings have a minimum building setback of 40' from property lines adjacent to properties zoned residential or properties having a residential L.U.D. . The building is to close to the west line. Please note that although the property adjacent to the west is designated as "Medium Density Residential" on the Approved Land Use Plan, it is more likely to be developed as business/commercial. 3. Driveway Ordinance No. 634 requires a minimum 500' between the centerline of the proposed driveway and any existing driveways and/or street intersections. The applicant has shown the proposed driveway centerline to be 207.5' from the west line of Lake Crest Drive. 4. Provide the required landscape parking islands for rear parking area. Ordinance 480-S (Corridor Overlay Zone) requires that each row of parking stalls have 18 s.f. per stall of landscaped parking islands, 8'bc-to-bc if curbed,and 9'ep-to-ep if no curb, and equal to the depth of the parking stall. It appears that the applicant has provide the required landscape parking islands in the front parking area. L_ 8F-4 City of Southlake,Texas * Any request for a reduction in the required number of parking spaces will require a variance granted by the Zoning Board of Adjustments. * A separate construction plan and permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Landscape Ordinance No. 544 and Zoning Ordinance No. 480 (Section 42, Bufferyards) are required prior to issuance of building permit. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. • • * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timothy Huckabee Huckabee&Associates, Inc. G:\WPF1REV\95\95-090SP.WPD 8F-5 - ..ih.ir0 i roe a , !ii.. I { i ilti Le i o . . / oa 3 � a,; t / 113. f • 31 • �3 I 1 I .Li2i it t• 1� T 'r r1 �a �, ! i i II 11 I 1.ii• ; 1 ,i/•;.-,:d....; 1111g. .01 ° i tilt 1 III: -1 � I •e � OH i3 3i II r --- °` it `F ' I; it 1 E '" , 1: —.1-00, -- • • --Aki,,' t. IL: 101 1 ,a • 4 +.� �.—iwri ipa ID ....,:iT44.1k3 ..,. :i.: tt i (..., n N'- 10 y 1I1111':64 i C - h t~ ..! ge t. .L I, :,,,ase,.,.„,..., 52 '!I' " =ni'.i_. -'�:fib: #' 1;Z i i 11 ! 1.2!1 r 1■! •%u�'patvT" .n�wurru.Pittutfiu.uu1u . 6v 1 !� 111 11 i tI E 'i5' --= Sri, E - •!I I: : 1 1 1 1 O . I . I aJJ7JJ I JI I 11 a : . 11 y ill' i 1; ! - . . €• i► r 1J3 I s l r ! r e as i 4: I I 1"1 = [ ! i f e ! �$ " 1 II s a t c cyy11 5 qqJya : eEtk hIiiI! 1ih3E i $ i v J J 7 J 7: J 7 J MininnedW (...„ 8F-6 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-76 Preliminary Plat/Village Center REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Village Center, Lots 1-6, Block 1, and Lots 1-7, Block 2, being 44.328 acres situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, being a portion of Tract 6 and also being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat of Farrar Addition and all of Lot 1,Block 1 of the Farrar Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1539,P.R.T.C.T. LOCATION: South and adjacent to East Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114), North and adjacent to East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709),and approximately 1000'West of Kimball Ave. OWNER: James Farrar, et. al. APPLICANT: The Midland Development Group CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/65 LDN Noise Contour NO.NOTICES SENT: Fifteen(15) RESPONSES: One(1) written response received within the 200' notification area: • Mary Evelyn Zembrod, 2141 E. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, "I am delighted with an expansion of the community's commercial base. Hopefully, this will help lower our taxes at some juncture." P &Z ACTION: August 3, 1995; Approved to Table (6-0) ZA95-76, Preliminary Plat for Village Center until the August 17, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the applicant's request and continue the public hearing. August 17, 1995; Approved (5-2) ZA95-76, Preliminary Plat for Village Lre. Center as amended and subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated August 11, 1995 with item#2B deleted. 8L-1 • MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK ZA95-76, PRELIMINARY PLAT SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 PAGE 2 COUNCIL ACTION: September 12, 1995 (continuation of City Council Meeting from 09-05-95); Approved to Table(4-0)ZA95-76, Preliminary Plat for Village Center until the September 19, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. September 26, 1995 (continuation of City Council Meeting from 09-19-95); Approved to Table(7-0),ZA95-76,Preliminary Plat for Village Center until the October 3, 1995 City Council Meeting per the applicant's request. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the Plat Review Summary No.2 dated August 11, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated September 1, 1995. Note that the plat shows a proposed public street (Village Center Drive) which divides the property in half and which aligns with Briarwood at Hwy. No. 114 on the North and approximately 430' East of the intersection of Westwood Drive and E. Southlake Blvd. on the South. Attached is an excerpt from a letter from Barry Hudson, consultant for the project,which addresses the road issues (e.g. alignment with existing streets, traffic movements and signalization, and centerline radii). Note that his comments are in response to the first Plat Review Summary, not the third review included in this packet. Following these comments is a reduction of the applicant's first submittal showing the Village Center aligning with Briarwood and Westwood. The road was relocated to its present location after hearing the comments of Woodland Heights' residents adamantly opposed to the first alignment. KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-76PP.3CC C 8L-2 - - - 3.21 Ac SA102 � IAA tE u 10 �-L' 4a 111 A< x183 t / ill/ 1 1 "ii .--r- �(�1gp 4 ,•/ Itl R T i 1 1 �" -r._ • �! m. �o�p1 SOP_ / 1 „ -'- a• II. • 1 `t J ` ``` It Ac SLRVE'1 A-13/1 .0L'-- ,_. t ��n r V� .----- 20 2 Ail 1 1 4 �. r'V r sAttl 1 - tt 1 • _ 'i t 1 xx12 1� ,t... ,,�� 10.4 Ac Y2A 1t ' " ..4 4)O A dQ 'M 1 i "t 1 1 ) `1 1 1 xl� ---' 3 AC xuaA I • i . 7F7 X4A . '4 H TMI ' i 91 _` At JAB D. : 9.47 k x.0 '1 _ •``��' C 4f3A Job • •__._. 1I ._'._ 3�101 x111 xiNt -- ', -- '`..z�::r.,,... �c e.7 Ae 11 ( • I • HllARY }{ 1 '[ yoP ,l .1 '� �'; t_��}11x 1 . — MIA xiJ2 x1J1 1alpli,+ •9: _ '�" ISi Y 3A1J4 513 At ho—Yj MS- 1 ..flit 1'13', 1r i • i1 222 ..a. ..�. t l r:_ i la . x14 JAus �j�_.�_1 r--- w. ? A,A 1.. 1 • EAf7 NoaA10 3111Q__ 1 1-0,11114 ( j,OLL K. ti 6� —- — c. fe 1is p1! $ JJ% a o' a — vliiii 5D20:.. �1�, Mili --. • eat At G V / • A ' �161� I ® EA®S x 3 T '� • t i • A-.e1 f sAx1 " ��®� p ^._Jt-._.1 • to �y ( 11 SA4. � C i•.rVi l 1 - i-V ' +O ii.I(' /f I 1 1 •- s, I / �/ SURVEY A-10i- ..• . 1 2B2 .$ 2B $1 s �RJ za x 2 - sA{A N za:2c x $ / • , `\ CITY ?2c W . 2E za • yet .• \HALL /" , P• a ® ` r - 2ee - 2u • :. _ xPI" -- seze ex .fa' Je 1e2 fr _ J 1 ' "NORTH / Si P�CYVY s['. . •) -• ' .--.• • lv .77 • 1 •Yc £a A p(r noo) xl i 1. W •rr1 7A 1.—_ t: ;t 2G 2 7B .4C2A •- t'. ,a ✓.s , r._J �: NAcIr sKw!' 2A3A1 f J41.Ac. e0 c xi at. �1't — • • • x 2A3.. • WA' 20 0 • •-'.%1•(g•-, ---. - . -r,--. r , - .-' . C3 ,:. 4 1- • FT__ r..;,.-4-7-:;,s........:: ., .i,..f. "\,..:\-.;.t. 4i,..... v,i ,.. :q.":"'.•...4;;ICJ. i i . . . � \:. ) a,, J t t !. !ate 1.•1 ' _ _ -- t 9 �;;� . TRACT MAP -- ' i 1 ii . i' ';--1 1. /:••i.. •"fir 2v At A. • t 11D _ _ _____ - , , �_: . I--- l II 4s , NI. N 1 911 P� T t4 1 1 m i I: 1 E N O p A m m CO 13 N / 1 9 CNI•CV I '0 1 m U E b N i - c 0 fV n Q V / Pm N g Cl p2 CC i UX _QU �� l a L. Z OZ ( 423) m 0 to ca:II N WOC) ZZN a CZ_. co adID. _U a poddn§lei O U CE ! Q o as g _0 I v �N �IV > 1 c, \ / ct i? w Q N C `J N I p . a I N U I a CCCC uo>tig.d / LE. . CNJ \----, Q \ N I \ 8L-4 1 , 1 1 1 I _ City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-76 Review No: Three Date of Review:9/01/95 Project Name: Preliminary Plat-Village Center.44.328 Ac. Thomas Mahan Survey Abst.# 1049 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: The Midland Development Group JBM Engineers &Planners 12655 Olive Boulevard. Westpark I. Suite 200 2630 W. Freeway. Suite 100 St. Louis, Missouri 63141 Fort Worth. Texas 76020 Phone: (214)980-8806. (314) 576-1900 Phone: (817)429-7560 Fax : (214) 980-8789.(314) 576-7005 Fax : (817)429-9322 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/21/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to rights of way: A. Additional right of way along East Southlake Boulevard will be required for acceleration, deceleration,and turn lanes. The typical requirement for acceleration/deceleration lane right of way dedication is 12' x 150' with a 150' transition. The applicant has provided right of dedications of 5'x 165' for deceleration and 5'x 175' for acceleration. B. Provide minimum center line radii of 600' feet for Village Center Drive. 2. Provide a 15'Drainage Easement around the main storm sewer trunk line crossing Lot 3,Block 1,and extend the easement to either the north or the east line of Lot 6, Block 1. * Lot 1,Block 1,Farrar Addition, Cabinet A, Slide 1539,P.R.T.C.T., must be vacated before the final plat can be filed.A copy of the standard operating procedure for plat vacation has been forwarded to the applicant and engineer. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Midland Development Group,Attn: Donald Silverman JBM Engineers&Planners James Farrar, C/O Farrar Real Estate, 600 West Park Row,Arlington,Texas 76020 Phone: (817)277-4411 (17 G:\WPF\REV\95\95-076PP.W PD 8L-5 � s ,C a I I g3 `i1 = 3114E 1101 DI j_i=4El iii iI N c AA: co'1 -'\\- Z #�i�if ill VIII eil ; iA 'f, 1., i , f 1j11.,, ,1 Is ill 1s W ,., .V "'A�t { 9s i iikii !(..,„ 1liii II1lisi 11,11! jE = 'fi ill ill Cl U d �""s o tg p 'igg ;II:, i11! ! ;A Ri111 _ 1!!t 41,11 ill I{! V9 , ,EM h 1 ]l Ili ;1;41 j1! *i�3(1/f V `i zoap °� 71 111111 t llthi lp�� Rilk i! S ' !1 i1. aIJiI'I illili llhith p, . , t gill I" 1 _ goo CO I E• rid G E �px a ' 6111114i !!!41!! «1¢ 4 3E Pt 1 il I -11 gl 1 t , aay - dadd R d 1111 !I Ia ig • r. . ,, , it 111 ,, , aI \ I, Q.. .0 qq RR 3 CZ; 1 - -` ,,,, ,...___, , lilt it al 34 i in—.-..—,J .r' _ ---�------AC�.....0 ` Lo WOW asWARN a.gfA{AOS I f+ a 'R11 1 1 .E }. - ,3�K�,.�cam Anal = - ac .�.w���_y / MI sr 111< 5 ,1 .1 M 4 . . 1 I, I c. ,ill — / I 0 �- IiLr i �--- r �+� Ni. i 1,1:'1 17 ! ^ k i 7K I et _ q§ ' `' inn ' %\i. i ` �, 4,',,i, ;;Il, i �! l Z �ft tit .:Is $� i t .+ •44 i r i i A.4,./ 1r ' = , ; / 1 11 41: ''' i71 , , atuaar •e.lw / ate�i \ %�` \e r! 1 ' 'D ODO1110. -1. ' t / :. I, il g ' ) '1I- a,� ________ il 44 _ Le , . .. , c .. • • *4 .4. 10-177 =----- ----- ~ dui MkAC•91.03a---r-------- , f;— _-. i. / / a _. , 41 81,-6 11 .___ - - - 11. / Ii of la-1V ►,1 -... -A... -I City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: OCTOBER 3. 1995 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall THIS MEETING TO BE CONTINUED WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M. le —q5 7. O 1'h 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to order. Invocation. 2. A. Executive Session: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on September 19, 1995, continued on September 26, 1995. Approved 6-0 Vote 4. Reports: A. Mayor's Report. B. City Manager's Report. C. SPIN Report. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 5. Consider: A. Resolution No. 95-27, Abandonment of an easement between Lots 39 and 40, SouthRidge Lakes. CONSENT B. Resolution No. 95-39, setting the Public Hearing date to discuss proposed Land APPROVED Use Assumptions for Southlake Impact Fee Study. 6-0 VOTE C. Resolution No.95-40,appointments to Southlake Youth Advisory Council(SYAC) City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda October 3, 1995 page two REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum. 7. Ordinances, second readings, public hearings, and related items. A. Ordinance No. 480-181, 2nd reading (ZA 95-79), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park, being 6.715 acres situated in the John A. Freeman PROVED Survey, Abstract No. 529, legally described as the northern portion of Lot 7R AP A P 0 OED and all of Lot 8, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I and being revised to Lot 8R, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I. Location: 1475' north of Fast Continental Blvd.. on the west side of South Kimball Avenue. Current zoning is "I-1" Light Industrial District; Requested Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Owners: David and Beverly Thorne and ELFM Corporation; Applicant: Terra Land Development Company. SPIN Neighborhood #7. PUBLIC HEARING. 8. Ordinances, first reading, and related items: A. Ordinance No. 480-179, 1st reading (ZA 95-73), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Residential), being 199.2 acres situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions • of Tracts 1A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A5, 2A7, the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. APPROVED 1207,being all of Tracts 1, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E1, 1F, 1F1, 1G, 1H, 5-1 VOTE 1J1,3A, 3A1, 3A1A, 3A1A1, 3A1A2, 3A2, 3A3, 3A3A, 3A3A1, 3A4, 3A4A, 3A4B, 3C, 4A, 4A1, 4B, 4B1, 4B2, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1, and includes all of Lot 4, Block A, MTP IBM Addition No. 1 as recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68. P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G, Slide 208, P.R.D.C.T. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (SH 114) , east of East T.W. King Road; north of West Dove Street. and west of North White Chapel Blvd. Current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District; Requested Zoning is "R-P-U-D."Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture. Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #2. B. Ordinance No. 480-180, 1st reading (ZA 95-74), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana (Non-Residential), being 127.2 acres situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 1C, 2A, 2A1, 2A2, 2A5, 2A6, APPROVED 2A7, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being portions of 6-0 VOTE Tracts 1 and 1C. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H.114). south of Kirkwood Boulevard and north of West Dove Road. Current zoning is "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda October 3, 1995 page three Planned Unit Development District. Requested Zoning is "NR-P.U.D." Non- Residential Planned Unit Development. "C-3" General Commercial District, "0- 2" Office District. "HC" Hotel District, and "CS" Community Service District. Owner: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture. Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #2.. C. Ordinance No. 480-182, 1st reading (ZA 95-83), Rezoning and Concept Plan for Meadow Ridge Estates, being 37.416 acres of land situated in the John A. APPROVED 4 Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tracts 1, 1A, 1C, 1D, and 3A. Location: 4 5-1 VOTE West side of Kimball Avenue. adjacent to and east of Woodland Heights Addition, and approximately 900' south of East Southlake Blvd. Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District. Owners: Mike and Ginger Jacobs, Dwaine Petty, and E.R.O.Development Company; Applicant: Biscoe Clark Company. The development proposes sixty-two (62) single family residential lots. SPIN Neighborhood #7. D. Ordinance No. 480-183, 1st reading (ZA 95-88), Rezoning for 3.38 acres situated Cor in the William H. Martin Sury , s o. 1068, Tracts 2A3 & 2A3A1. _ Location: West side of private street, Marantha Way Current zoning is ,r'':r ' '0 ED ".:G" Agricul ith a requested zoning of"SF-1B" Single Family Residential CTOBER 10, 1' District. Owner/Applicant: Lawrence L. Post. SPIN Neighborhood#12. ` : 30 p.m. E. ZA 95-89, Plat Revision of Lots 1R1, and 1R2, Block A, Commerce Business. Park, legally described as a 1.5703 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas APPROVED Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, and being a revision of Lot 1, Block A, (6-0 VOTE\ Commerce Business Park as shown on the Plat recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Location: 225 Commerce Street on the southeast corner of Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and Commerce Street. Current zoning is "I-1" Light Industrial District. Owner: Randy Pack; Applicant: Landes & Associates Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #7. . F. ZA 95-90, Site Plan for an Office Complex being Lot 6, Hiriam Grandberry No. 581 Addition, and being further described as 0.908 acres situated in the Hiriam 0�1T I NUED Grandberry Survey, Abstract No. 581. Location: South side of Southlake Blvd.. OCTOBER 10 , _.wl 1'''• 1709) approximately 80' west of the entrance to Lake Crest Addition. 7 : 30 P.M. ) Currrent zoning is "0-1" Office District. Owner/Applicant: Dr. Timothy L Huckabee. SPIN Neighborhood #14. L • City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda October 3, 1995 page four G. ZA 95-85, Concept Plan for Southlake Retail Center, being 3.351 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, Tract 2B and proposed Lots 1,2, APPROVED & 3, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition. Location: 1800' west of North Peytonville 6-0 VOTE Avenue. 350' east of Randol Mill Avenue; and on the north corner of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owners/Applicants: DKV (Sutton) Partners II, L. P., Drews Realty Group, General Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #13. H. ZA 95-94, Site Plan for Schlotzsky's, being proposed as Lot 1, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, and being legally described as a portion of Tract 2B, 0.826 acres APPROVED situated in the W:R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500. Location: North of West 6-0 VOTE Southlake Blvd.. (F.M. 1709) approximately 800' east of Randol Mill Avenue. Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner: Schlotsky's Inc.; Applicant: Perspective Design, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #13. I. ZA 95-70, Plat Showing for Lots 1, 2, and 3, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, being 3.351 acres of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, Tract 2B. Location: 1800' west of North Peytonville Avenue. 350' east of APPROVED Randol Mill Avenue: and on the north side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. -0 VOTE 1709). Current zoning is "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner/Applicant: DKV (Sutton) Partners II L.P. Drews Realty Group, General partners. SPIN Neighborhood #13. J. Ordinance No. 480-184, 1st reading (ZA 95-95), Rezoning for 3.678 acres situated in the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Tract 6E1. Location: North APPROVED side of Union Church Road. approximately 1200' west of Davis Blvd. (F.M. 6-0 VOTE 1938). Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of"SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owners/Applicants: Joseph & Kimiela Mortazavi. SPIN Neighborhood #15. K. ZA 95-96, Plat Showing of Lots 7 & 8, J.G. Allen No. 18 Addition, being 3.678 acres situated in the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Tract 6E1. Location: APPROVED North side of Union Church Road. approximately 1200' west of Davis Blvd. 6-0 VOTE (F.M. 1938). Current zoning is "AG" Agricultural, with a requested zoning of "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Owners/Applicants: Joseph & Kimiela Mortazavi. SPIN Neighborhood #15 L A 95-76, Preliminary Plat for Village , s - , Block 1, and Lots 1-7, Block 2, being 44.328 acre • in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049 CONTINUED • and being a po • Tract 6 and also being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously -4 'BBER 10 • appro reliminary Plat of Farrar Addition and all of Lot 1, Block 1, of the . 30 P.M. City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda October 3, 1995 page five Farrar Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1539, P.R.T.C.T. Location: South and adjacent to east Northwest Parkway (SH114) and north and adjacent to East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). approximately 1000' west of Kimball Avenue. Current zoning is "C-3" Commercial District. Owner: James Farrar, et.al.: Applicant: The Midland Development Group. SPIN Neighborhood #4. 9. Resolutions (no items this agenda). 10. Other items for consideration: DENIED A. Variance request to Ordinance No. 483-C, Section 501 (H) (1) by Terry 4-2 VOTE Wilkinson for a driveway on Continental Blvd. 11. Other items for discussion (no items this agenda). 12. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas, on Friday, September 29, 1995 at 5:00 p.m., pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. N�putttunrrp4i andra L. LeGraiid ti / ', City Secretary "' s. a Corr pro If you plan to attend this public meeting .. ic4 .bility that requires special needs, please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704 and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. c:\WPFILES\CC110-3-.AGAn,1 • • City of Southlake,Texas • EXECUTIVE SESSION PENDING LITIGATION-SECTION 551.071 The City Council may consider pending and contemplated litigation subjects. The following subjects may be discussed: 1. Legend Custom Homes. 1993 2. VW Investments, Inc. and Frost Fuels Corporation, dba Southlake Fuels vs. City of Southlake, Texas, Curtis E. Hawk, Karen P. Gandy, and the Southlake Board of Adjustments. 1994 3. Aledo Construction. 1994 4. Walters Claim. 1995 5. Gary H. Hargett and Sherry D. Hargett vs. Ralph V. Williams, Warren Hagan, and the City of Southlake. 1995 Litigation is, by nature, an on-going process, and questions may arise as to trial tactics which need to be explained to the City Council. Upon occasions, the City Council may need information from the City Attorney as to the status of the pending or contemplated litigation subjects set out above. After discussion of the pending and contemplated litigation subjects in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in open session. LAND ACQUISITION-SECTION 551.072 The City Council may consider the purchase, exchange, lease, or sale of real property. After discussion of land acquisitions in executive session, any final action, or vote taken, will be in open session. PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.074 The City Council may consider the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City Board and Commission Members. A complete list of the City Boards and Commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office. DEPLOYMENT OF SECURITY PERSONNEL-SECTION 551.076 Regarding the deployment or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices. After discussion of any or all of the above, in executive session, any final action or vote taken will be in open session by the City.Council. If personnel issues or litigation issues arise, or a need to seek advice from the City Attorney as to the posted subject matter of this City Council meeting, an executive session will be held. City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 8, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Lasts Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consideration of Splitting the Planning and Zoning Commission Into Two Separate Commissions The splitting of the Planning and Zoning Commission into two separate -bodies, a Planning Commission and a Zoning Commission, deserves some thorough evaluation. The Planning Commission would handle review of comprehensive planning elements such as the Land Use Plan (L.U.P.), Thoroughfare Plan, Corridor Study, and development of planning related ordinances. The Zoning Commission would be responsible for review of current issues such as zoning, platting and site plan requests. I offer the following potential beneficial and detrimental effects to such a division at this time in the City of Southlake. POTENTIAL BENEFITS TO ESTABLISHING TWO COMMISSIONS 1. MORE PARTICIPATION: Two Commissions would allow the appointment of seven additional citizens to a responsible position providing guidance for the development of the City. It would also allow more opportunities for public hearings to discuss planning issues. 2. MORE FOCUS: It would allow the Commissioners to focus more directly on one area of planning, long term comprehensive issues or current development issues. POTENTIAL DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS OF SPLIT COMMISSIONS 1. LOSS OF COMPREHENSIVE DECISION MAKING: I feel that the Commissioners make better short term and long term decisions when they have a part in the development of comprehensive planning documents and ordinances, as well as the day-to-day struggle with current issues such as zoning and platting cases. They better understand how the long range plans are developed and can use that knowledge in the evaluation of current development requests. Conversely, the conflicts and difficulties in interpretation that arise during review of cases provides valuable lessons in reality to be remembered when they attempt to develop a comprehensive planning document or a regulatory ordinance. (( 2. THE RUBBER STAMP SYNDROME: Staff is concerned that the Zoning Commissioners will be frustrated with the feeling that they must zone in accordance with the L.U.P. generated by the Planning Commission and that their duties are basically a rubber stamp of what the other body has decided. City of Southlake,Texas 3. -STAFFING: The establishment of a second Commission would necessitate hiring more planning staff to service the Commission. It is my feeling that the following would be required at a minimum to provide a minimum level of staff support for a Planning Commission. Note that this does not include any additional office space to locate this personnel. STAFF POSITION WAGES / CAPITAL SUPPLIES, etc TOTALS BENEFITS COSTS Planner $40,787 $4,600 $400 $45,787 Planning Technician $29,677 $4,600 $400 $34,677 Administrative Secretary $27,140 $4,600 $400 $32,140 TOTALS $97,604 $13,800 $1,200 $112,604 SUMMARY The concern seems to be that it takes too long to get new ordinances or master plans approved due to the length of the Planning and Zoning agendas and occasional tabling of these type items due to the late hour. While it is true that these items are not developed as quickly as their proponents would wish, it should be noted that there have been several major projects completed by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the past three years. These projects include: Thoroughfare Plan Update, complete reformatting and update of the Land Use Plan, development of a Landscape Ordinance, a Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Sign Ordinance, a Driveway Ordinance, a Corridor Study and related zoning ordinance revisions and other major revisions to sections of the Zoning Ordinance, the Subdivision Ordinance and the Drainage Ordinance. This work has been accomplished by a Commission with a solid grasp on the long term, as well as the short term development issues currently facing Southlake. We have also surveyed several D/FW cities to see if they are utilizing a separate commission format. Out of eleven (11) cities, only Fort Worth (population 469,500) was utilizing the split format (see attached survey exhibit). This is not to say that because no one else is doing it, we shouldn't either. Southlake has been on the leading edge of contemporary regulating controls in recent years and has developed many unique approaches necessary to insure quality controlled development. It would be my recommendation that the Commission not be split into separate bodies at this point in the development of the City of Southlake. Please feel free to contact me should you like to discuss this further. GL end: City Survey of Planning and Zoning Commission Formats C:\WPRBUDGET\95-96TZSPLIT.WPD PHONE SURVEY OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FORMAT 6/21/94 pity Contact Approximate Population Planning&Zoning Commission Phone # Combined or Separate? • Arlington Nancy Caveness 277,000 COMBINED (817)459-6650 Bedford Rita Frick 44,500 COMBINED (817)952-2101 Colleyville Doug Henderson 15,250 COMBINED (817)577-7575 Coppell Gary Sieb 22,150 COMBINED (214)462-1431 Dallas Ray Couch 1,023,400 COMBINED (214)670-3086 Euless Rod Tyler 39,650 COMBINED (817)685-1420 Flower Mound Gina Costanza 25,550 COMBINED (214)539-6006 ( Fort Worth Vida Hariri 469,500 SEPARATE (817)871-8045 ' apevine Marcy Ratcliff 33,000 COMBINED (817)481-0377 Hurst John Pitstick 34,750 COMBINED (817)788-7095 Keller John Webb 16,750 COMBINED (817)431-1519 N.Richland Hills Clayton Husband 49,550 COMBINED (817)581-5500 Richland Hills Jeanie Coons 8,000 COMBINED _. (817)595-6625 G:\WPF\MISC\PZ2 STDY.WPD 4. Presented to City Council during Public Forum on Septenber 19, 1995 No Multi-Family Zoning!! My name is Jim Giffin and I reside at 3002 Briar Lane,Southlake. I and many others came to Southlake to enjoy a country like setting of homes set well apart and send our children to one of the best public schools in the country. As of today,we are sending our children to one of the best schools in the country,but the living environment in the city is no longer what it was when I moved here. We now have stone and brick walls lining our streets so that it appears we are driving in a tunnel. PUD's with Zero lot lines have been approved. And now under consideration is a further degradation of the atmosphere I moved here for,multi family units. In other words APARTMENTS. This issue is not about the quality of development that is being proposed. McGuire Lir Thomas has a history of building quality developments. This issue is entirely about what type of product we,the citizens of Southlake,want in our city. I view the job of the city council as first and foremost to work for the voting residents of Southlake. There is not currently any provision(to my knowledge at least) for apartment building in Southlake. That's the way the citizens of Southlake like it. If some developer cries that his development will not work without apartments,I say change the development NOT THE ZONING. With every surrounding town already having zoning allowing multi family development, I cannot see why Southlake needs this type of zoning. What does it bring to me the common resident that I need? With apartments readily available in surrounding towns only minutes away,no new businesses will need them. So what benefit do apartments provide to the residents of Southlake? I see none except t provide a reason for the walled and gated communities being developed. ;STIP1 Our school system is already being burdened with rampant growth in population C.,, without the commercial and industrial growth to provide offsetting tax revenue. We've grown approximately 20 %each year for the last three years. Adding any type of high density housing only exacerbates an already difficult situation. Once we have zoning for multi family in one place, it will develop other places. Just as the PUD zoning has done. First, a high quality,high dollar development is proposed to lure the city into creating a new zoning category; and then, the less than high dollar developments creep in once the zoning has been created. That will happen with multi family. It has happened everywhere else. The buyers and developers of land in Southlake knew when they bought their property what type of development our zoning provided for. History does repeat itself. Let's learn and benefit from the experience of others and not repeat the same mistakes. JUST SAY NO TO ANY MULTI FAMILY ZONING IN SOUTHLAKE. WE DON'T NEED IT AND WE DON'T WANT IT. If that message is not clear to you,I suggest that you owe it to the residents of Southlake to put this issue before them for a vote. Thank you for you time. September 19, 1995 ### 2 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Variance Request to Ordinance No. 483 C, Section 501 (H) (1) by Terry Wilkinson for a Driveway on Continental Blvd. Mr. Terry Wilkinson, 1200 Wyndham Hill Lane, has requested a variance to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 C, Section 501 (H)(1). This section prohibits any driveway onto an arterial street, in this case, Continental Blvd. This request was on the September 19, 1995 Council agenda, but several items on the agenda, including this request, were tabled to the next following Tuesday, September 26. Because of a misunderstanding, Mr. Wilkinson was not at the September 26 meeting, therefore, Council tabled this request to the next meeting. Background Mr. Wilkinson, while constructing his house, was allowed a temporary gated construction access to Continental Blvd. Sometime in June 1995, this access was paved at the same time Mr. Willcinson's driveway was paved. June 20, 1995 the situation was discussed with Mr. Wilkinson. June 21st, Mr. Wilkinson submitted the attached letter along with a check for $1,000 which is more than the estimated cost to remove the concrete driveway. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy was granted on June 23, 1995. In the mile distance between S. Peytonville and S. White Chapel Blvd. there are eight existing driveways to Continental, all of which are from homes which have existed for many years. This driveway also has a sight distance problem for west bound traffic on Continental. Requested Variance Mr. Willcinson's attached letter dated September 8, 1995 states "...we have discovered that when a large piece of equipment is needed to remove a dead tree or regrade the common area after a hard rain the only good access is along the abandoned Peytonville Road ROW on the west edge of lot 50 block 2" (Mr. Wilkinson's lot). L / i9^I , Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Wilkinson Variance Request September 29, 1995 Page 2. Please place this on the October 3, 1995, 1995 Council agenda 601/2ttz, BW/sm Attachments: Letter dated Sept. 8, 1995 Letter dated June 21, 1995 Letter dated Sept. 1, 1995 wpdoc\wthead.mem\monticel.dry L • • 1-ESTATEs September 8, 1995 Bob Whitehead, P. E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Access to Continental Blvd. Dear Bob, Enclosed please _find a copy of the site plan for The Hills of Monticello, as shown we have a considerable amount of common areas with lakes, creeks, and jogging trails. The common area narrows at one location just south of phase VI along the Big Bear Creek. This area is heavily wooded and has a jogging trail going thru it. This makes access for heavy equipment impossible without the removal of a large number of mature trees . Routine maintenance and mowing is not e ,problemsthru this area however we have discovered that when a large piece of equipment in needed to remove a dead tree or regrade the common area after a hard rain the only good access is along the abandoned Paytonville Road R 0 W on the west edge of lot 50 block .2 . I would therefore like to request a variance to Ordinance No. 483C, Section 501 (H) (1) in order to keep the access approach on Continental Boulevard. If you have any questions of need any additional information, please contact me at 329-4599 . Sincerely,^/ erry L. Wilkinson 7• L /0/9-3 • 930 Parkview Lane, Southlake, Texas 76092 • (817) 329-4599 • fax (817 ) 488-2420 - ' (111,,, June 21, 1995 Robert Whitehead Director of Public Works City of Southlake Dear Mr Whitehead As per our conversation on June 20, 1995, regarding the access approach on Continental Boulevard and 1200 Wyndham Hill Lane: I understand that this access approach should not have been constructed without an permit. It was my intent that this approach would provide a means of accessing the park area for Heavy equipment: The park area in Phase III of The Hills of Monticello has a narrow point between the residential lots and the Big Bear Creek: We have a trail going thru that area and it is heavily wooded, this makes access for heavy equipment impossible without removal Of a large number of mature trees. Le Since this approach access is located on my personal lot, and my home is nearing completion, I would like to request that the e3,tx, a_ liow me fa- Eomplete mgr home and I will place sufficient move 'in escroii Witii the City to ensure that the access approacI# is removed if . the City Council is not agreeable to this approach remaining on the lot. Sincerel , erry L. Wilkinson L 4 • • • • • 1 F �� , 0 yam; o r , _i • • • • • • • \'S . .. j a Y J • . • x 1 t l ►L ‘ • d . ) —r ! •• •• `,• 49, ° 1• c...,: t.`.,;} .t. = V 0 i x A r .'!. 1 Y.V L • (IN. Ilk QJ • i : . o255 . oy rWo , 7 LJl tn t }8>iN 0 5< 2 L.-4 ill � ti k : F- �O ` a tai Yt ;E± o x. too W� *IIIIIII., i • o • • • L ... . • ..,•• .. .•. . • • • • i . ,.7a- 5 0 AA... Cityof South lake 0Utiilak, • September 1, 1995 Mayor. Gary Fickes Mayor ProTem: AndrewLWambsganss Terry Wilkinson Deputy Mayor Pro Tern: 1200 Wyndham Hill Lane PamelaA.Muller Southlake, Tx 76092 Councilmembers: MichaelT.Richarme Re: Expiration of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy W.Ralph Evans at 12 0 0 W ndham Hill Lane. Sally R.Hall Y Ronald J.Maness • City Manager Dear Mr. Wilkinson: Curtis E.Hawk Assistant City Manager. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy (CO) was granted on Shane K.Yelverton June 23, 1995 for a thirty (30) day period which expired City Secretary July 23, 1995 . This temporary C. O. was issued for two SandraLLeGrand reasons: (iire 1) to allow additional time for the correction of red tag items . 2) for you to request a variance to Ordinance No. 483C, Sect. 501 (H) (1) , (Subdivision Ordinance) regarding the illegal driveway connection to West Continental . To date, none of the above has been addressed and there has been no verbal or written communication from you concerning these items. The next City Council meeting is scheduled for September 19th, 1995. A request to be placed on the agenda must be made ten (10) calendar days before the meeting. Please contact Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary, at 481-5581 ext. 704 for additional information. Please be advised that a permanent C. O. must be obtained by September 20, 1995. Failure to comply with this request will result in the revocation of the expired (16...' temporary C. O. which is in accordance with Sect. 109. 6 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code. 667 North Carroll Avenue • Southlake, Texas 76092 /� �J (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-5097 "V !- AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' (or' If there are any questions, please contact me at 481-5581 ext . 755 . Thank you for your cooperation regarding this matter. Sincer , Paul Ward Building Official xc: Bob Whitehead, P. E. Director of Public Works PW/dc (ape Encl/2 Certified No. Z 684 565 161 (hre 2 . , . . .. . • " ' . . •, -. ,. . .•. ,. ;,, ..• .. • . , .. , . . , ., •. .. Site ... . ..... . '. Plan . .. ... .. .,...., ‘.,:...........:.•:::.........:.i„...............: . . . . •.... :... , . , . .... . . ......,..... ...;.: •.. .. .• . . , . . ._ . . . . . . . , • • . . WHITE CHAPEL BLVD. - . . •. • - .. .. . . •. . . . . • . . . . . • . . - .,. ...-,' . , .. 1111,-.1 i lk • '49 fre.' ..,_•••-•' •.e. ..,,v,,,7 • . . . -,; -:•:" • .. .. . . ... . . .. .. . ••ti.-1.1 . ././..........--77—' • . -. ••••.- .. .;•• .. - , . . • . , • .. . . •.. . ... -II . • •• ... - ', . ., . StN • ... -• ••• . • '.- • .'. . . ,.. . . . • , • .(... . '''.4, . .. . . -.• • • ' - ". '.. ... •. '. . .... . •.', es:1 • ,._ . , .,-, , W • . . • ,. , ,... .„ ., . . . .. ... . . _ . ,.,, • ,. > -•• -" • ....• ..•• .•.• • .• . , .. . • 1 . •. • • ••- iiiww•-• ...A:•0: .- - •. • - _•.• ......, • , -..., -. •-: •. - ''' . . -e. . • • • .. • . .... . • •• _ .114r.•. . . . _ • . .. • ,_ .. . .. . . . . , . . . . . _ .. . • • - • • • -. .. •-. . • • ..... :.A..lia . .: . ,•..• • . . • •- 4,•:,.,,. . .. . • - - . . • ..-. . • , -. . ,, .,- s...,- '''' l'.. .-/. _ , . AM ',0‘ . ...... „.. ... ..,. ...,. , .-,_ • • '- - • • ,. — FA V,C 4,- . ' ' , -Iirert,- - ,- ' . • . ,-,,,-, ..., „ . . . , .. . . . ., •:..- : - . • ., ,, .• — - ' • • -:: 6 I/4 • ,... j.• . .‘•..' '.',•-•', ''•.'.''.' ., ....„.... ., .....-.. ....,. . . ... ._ ..,,. . ... . . . . .... . . . „. .• ... .. •-••. ,' - • -•..•••• , „ - . . . ..- . ... , • •• --*''.••• '•' • • .,-• • •• -- - - -• • ... .... , [ ,e, '---'•••'•,•,' ••••• '. •'..• '. • .... * -• ..- .... - -••- .,...-. • . . . • •••, . • ... •. : . ..... . ,.. • .. ,., ,. . . ... . . . t. . . . . . , . ,. .... . . . .., ., • . . ,... ... . _ . . .s. . .. • • . .-. , . • . . . . .. • . - , _ . .. •. . .• . 4.: • ',.. • ., .. . - . -. , . • . . ... . . . - • ... .• . . • 114.if4 ' ' ,, ' ' • • •-' • '" ' • • • - i. • CI iNi .., . . ••- ' •'''''.n •'.; -.1 - . 41.7,.7.'•,..,...,-;_____::::._,„..... .-.-•-,'". .-.' .e..4"...•-•,.,..,,:te.2:...;;;;.:,..... ..,,,',...;;`'...i•,;,;:-.7.,.;:'i;,':,..5.,-..-----.,4...''''' .. -- . ... • .. • - '' .M3 ...-1- 111-i . • . ''.-:::--- 4 .,. _ . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . •- ' • •' • LliW . • _ -",:;, . - .r. ---- .4,, ', . • .... - • .... • ...,.• , ....-• ••- , ... ,,,_ .„ ,._.. „,. .. • ,,. •• . .4. - .. . *,•••'.:-`'''.--'-';; -. ... . . • . pi! . A.t.1. :‘4 e-..-;:l'i'l . • . . . .. ., . ... . .•. .... - : . : ._ , ' '-• i' ,-,7'...... -::-.': -,,.---: ::.:,.--,-. :.:.-_-,..-;,:.'',..,!.-,s-. • ,-,,,..-----•-.1,,i- ..,:.•-•,- • . . . . . . . ._ .... .•. .:- . . . .., , . . . . . , ,.. .. . . ..- --..- -.. -.. . • , .•.. ..... . '.-..; .--•-•,:•-•-.••:--,.. ...._5.-.....,'.-..4-,.....--•<,,,,...-......-. . , . • .• ., . .: ... . . _,„.. . . . 3 .. . ... . 1I14. f i . ..._.... . , . •.,-. - • -.-. - ''-'0../•',7,4•.':••,"."-;-,_ • . ' - •• - • -- --- . -- • MI' --".4.;% ' ,• . ';''''-''''\ 41t • :-•:-.•.' .Y.••' '''.-•'.-..-.5•.:;',4'.;•:,••••'-':.:-.1'-.. - .• , ... ..., . . '-;.,.':::..'-2-,-•- --,...::'-ffi,,•:'.. :. -lr.";, .-.-. . - -,. '...i . f.--,. --. '‘.. , ... „ . , .. .., . .. . .- . ..., - . ......... , ...„,., .... .., ., . ... . . .. . . .,-.. ..• .,.• . .....•.. .„, •••••'-- -- . . — , - . " tl) ,,,,,‘ li.4' . ;'-'''' '''':•••' '• . • • . ' III PARK Fa,RECREATION ARA. .S..'.....:-.•:,......!, ...,:•:_.•;:•..r......",,...".`..•;'.:-..' , -''•••-.... •.'•:;' ' '.-:'.'::::,:c-','•-'.-'... • ' -• • i',/ r r'' .,.:',•' A-1 • •'. ''...'''.'':: 1.....f•':-..-".,, ':. ‘4•.:....- , . ;.,..'.''.:'•'--.!.-.........e-''7.'..1.,,,..• '''-r,-: - ' .," .- •'',; . ., , z, : •'''." • s -•"'' '' ' .-• •'•• • .1.`. .':!.-7.70..12 il.41.,...,!*,,- "',.•.!'',;, • •I 1 - •' it' .• . .. ...-. .. ,,• . .. IÔGES . .I is. -• . ..- - . , -' BR '''''-,-..4';'..: ..-'-''i-r!:;',1" : :'2-.(‘-‘.--: -.'''.•••.•- •''. ''g.' • lei •r"..t. -.4..'-'••.• '.I-.•.1: .?,'•••.':'•••••:••• '-- ' -44•'.. •i.... -. i'''' ''''"'" - • • ' '' ' , $1, .. . .....'-.>/- . . , . . .. 4 , • . . . . , . . . , SECURITY GATE - L . .. . .... .- • ...,_k l • , .. .. - . . . y I.i, E 17 I L L S 0.f • rrlycua 4 - . , ,. • • • ....r., • . . r".47., 'ft //7 0.0,•0.1::/,‘,##,..i.fe,N.,/,. .1 4,444.444'4.-4. ••••.................................../...• 10 4-8 ,...... • •• . ••. .. . .. . CONCEPT PLAN SOLANA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY AUGUST, 1995 ` l 2, I � I d � I �� �4,3 O• �1 '12"E AD��S�OpG 63 o. 5' s ���E � P 11 3a3121 , / / DEVELOPMENT 11 TEXAS ® M� o,.M' _ _ DENTONCOUNTY _ _ _ _APPROXIMATE COUNTY LINE- \ No LEG TARRANT COUNTY O y 0 y GSM 0 100 200 300 400 1 "=200' PROPOSED 160 SOLANA RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. - 0 AC 3'�3, v C�' I RESIDENTIAL AREA - \- I \ \ \ \ \ �� p. ¢2 \�q• COMMON OPEN SPACE (1 1 %) - 21 .1 AC. ® ° ❑ ❑ S 947;2 "E S 00.12'32" w �� \' 113228' I I SUBTOTAL NET AREA = 181.2 AC. ❑ ❑ . 43.43' N89'S0'38"E 660.05' N89'33'04"E 6�7 ❑ O _ N89'42'23"E 479.25' t \ _ag fl ❑0c \ \` N7 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ N 0 23�'p8 w �00_pDDcO❑o❑❑OOOO 6 �O❑❑❑❑❑❑❑o❑ ❑ 000 ©� 4p443. ❑❑❑❑o ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ RESIDENTIAL �� sT RESIDrli IY ��'�RiAQ W K/�Q _ ° 000 ° ° ° o a ❑ 0 _ SINGLE FAMILY - PRODUCT TYPES A & B ?� I I'vo l�p,�� 000 000 ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 MULTIFAMILY - PRODUCT TYPES C & D R.O. w� `1 o ❑ ❑ ❑ (MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DWELLING UNITS ` ® ❑ 0 ` ❑ ❑ r OF PRODUCTS TYPE B,&AND D = 200) a a ° ° 3�'B 2� N18'09'51W ❑ (POTENTIAL ANCILLARY USES C-3 b C-S) J p�. S C3,pU USA 3.34' I ❑ ❑ c fM�.�vv , o ❑ I * /�✓ ^� rr o ❑ o / a \ cQo 8 OF .W P ❑ ❑ ❑ r / \ K�FIi�W. R1GN r ❑ n ❑ 1 yg7'' 40"E ❑ ❑ 0 / <A3 ❑❑❑❑ Qv�RE O003 ❑a ❑ ❑❑❑((�p��❑❑WORE. DODO ❑ ° a o❑❑❑❑TS-R`iPR QR� ❑❑0❑0 0 ❑ l ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 c, evE R�(PRD❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ° o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �/ 10' TYPE "F1' BUFFERYARD *QUIRED DODO-,; BVF �J❑00O❑ OoOO ❑ ❑ 0OC / FOR MULTI -FAMILY ONLY p=99'18'20" ❑ 1Q Z`(P E , ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ° ° ° ° ° 10' TYPE 'F1' BUFFERYARD PROVIDED ` R=90.00' JO❑❑❑ ❑0000❑000❑❑ o❑❑❑ ❑o 0O FOR MULTI -FAMILY ONLY ` L=155.99' -'� 300 0 0`L_O,.J❑O❑❑O❑❑❑O❑O❑❑❑❑❑ o❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ 2 a T=105.95' 1000000000000000000000 0000 ❑❑❑ ❑ Q L.C.=N13'36'16"E 000000000000000000000 00 0000❑ 000❑ l a 137.18' 00000000000000000000 00000 ❑❑ ❑ ❑ oo 00000000000000000000❑00 00000 0000 \\� \x ,❑❑ c°❑o L=06'26'28" ❑❑❑O❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑O ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑O. R-1452.40' ❑a❑❑oo❑a❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑°❑ O❑ .o❑❑o❑❑r 13 ° RESIDENTIAL 0000000000000000 ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ 00eT=81.72' c000ODODOODO❑ L.C.=N12'39''41"W OO❑O❑O❑°❑❑❑❑❑�Jl❑ 0000 0000 E FAMLY P TYP E r A ❑ °°6❑❑O❑O❑❑❑OOOrQj ❑❑❑ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rc:p ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑ c �� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ° ❑ ° ❑ ❑ ❑ O 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ O T �' �z 000❑❑0� 000 000 ❑❑❑❑ 0 Q ❑❑❑❑��, ❑❑❑o❑ ❑❑0❑ ❑❑❑ t �\ \ ❑❑F�� 0000 ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑O❑ \ cam, ❑ o ❑ o ❑ 0 0 0 O 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 10' TYPE "E' BUFFERYARD REQUIRED Q ❑ ❑ ° ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 20' TYPE "E" BUFFERYARD PROVIDED W 00 ❑❑❑❑ 0000❑ coo - - -- \ o 0000 00❑ 000❑ 00000000000000000000 �" ? coo 0000 DODO O ❑0❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑0❑000oo ❑❑❑❑❑ Oa❑ p❑❑O ` 00000000000000000000 Qom' '❑❑ 000 ❑O❑❑ o 00000000000000000000 REQUI o ` ❑op❑ ❑❑ao❑ ❑❑°° ❑❑❑❑❑O0❑°❑❑❑❑❑°❑❑000❑ BUFFERYARD o 0 ❑ ❑0 ❑❑0❑❑ ❑❑0000❑000000❑❑❑0❑❑❑❑ �` 10' TfPE »8» BUFFERYARD PRO # o jo ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑O coo 000000000000000000000o 2p TYPE s� 000 000 0000 0000 ❑❑ 00000000000000000000 0 0 \ Z ❑O ❑oo❑ ❑❑ ❑❑O❑❑o❑oa❑o❑0❑0❑❑❑❑❑❑❑r a \ s�.00 ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑CY❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ a ❑❑❑❑ ❑0 000000000000000000000❑DOC 000 000000000000000000000000000, °•s••-00000000000000000000000000000000 �Q0000000000000000000000000000000 Q 000000000000000000000OO❑❑❑❑❑❑C sue. 00000000000000000000000000001 000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 WELL Q 00000000000000000000❑❑ a� �p000000000000000000000ooc PROPOSED SOLANA NON- RESIDENTIAL 000000000000000000000❑❑r °° ° ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ° ° ❑ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 1 000000000000000000000 ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ P.U.D. \ \ °Or - ..7-.,- 1300000 00000 00N532734 E❑r,nnnnnricoo NON-RESIDENTIAL AREA = 87.0 AC. \ . 6 00'_ IN89'45'00"W1 ❑ ❑ ❑ tis ❑ ❑ L6.7 �,? ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 068' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑O❑ o❑o❑0❑❑❑00❑0 COMMON OPEN SPACE = 34.6 AC. �\ `'� s, ❑ ❑❑❑0°°°°°O°oo s. ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑OE R.O.W. TO BE DEDICATED = 5.6 AC. - - - - - - - - - - N00'15'24"W q 51.00 TOTAL GROSS AREA = 127.2 AC.60 (ALL AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE) 4¢' �v GN FLOOD LIGHTS Jay J� r�L \ s LEGEND J COMMON OPEN SPACE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE °°°°°°° COMMON OPEN SPACE TO BE MAINTAINED ❑❑❑❑❑00 °°°°°°° BY H.O.A. OR P.M.A. ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ FLOOD PLAIN L.U.D. LAND USE DESIGNATION M,D.R. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L.D.R. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL C.O.E. CORPS OF ENGINEERS BNDY. AG ZONING - AGRICULTURAL CS ZONING - COMMUNITY SERVICE C3 ZONING - GENERAL COMMERCIAL PUD ZONING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SP1 ZONING - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL POTENTIAL AREAS OF PERMITTED ANCILLARY NON-RESIDENTIAL USES C 3 & C-S NOT TO EXCEED A TOTAL OF 19.9 ACRES IN THE ENTIRE RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. NOTES: 1. THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED AS SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION FOR A REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. THE INTENT OF THIS DRAWING IS TO SHOW THE GENERAL BOUNDARIES OF THE TWO PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS. 2. REFER TO FIGURE NO. 8 FOR THE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY. 3. REFER TO FIGURE NO. 9 FOR THE MAJOR UTILITY PLAN. 4. REFER TO FIGURE NO. 10 FOR THE PROPOSED KIRKWOOD THOROUGHFARE PLAN. 5. REFER TO FIGURE NO. 12 FOR THE OPEN SPACE PLAN. OWNER: MTP-IBM PHASE II & III JOINT VENTURE NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE SUITE 500 WESTLAKE, TEXAS 76262 (817)430-0303 o, 7� ` i p=17'06' 17" R = 2 401.83' L= 717.03' L.C.=N27'59'17"W 714.37' I { I R.O.W. TO BE DEDICATED = 18.0 AC. TOTAL GROSS AREA = 199.2 AC. (ALL AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE) i '56'04"E 333.16' S02'11 ' 25"E 107.81' G\' S26'56'00"E �\ 140.56' J� 0 S38'46'03"E 192.24' S41'21'36"E 321.22' Z 10'49'51" R=2019.60' L= 381.77' L.C.= 39209 04"E \�G' a o�60 q . o V kp \ �{� a \� x - Sh PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE Q FOR WIDENING OF STREET 0.858 ACRES PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL '-- - -- - ---------- P.U.D. NO. __ o o SOLANA' EXISTING ZONING) C31C UD JJ = �� �p�' EXISTING L.U.D. MIXE SE PROPOSED L.U.D. = MIXED SE \` �° Y \ J.W. REIMENSCHNEIDER / AND W.P.FLETCHER .- PP ice- - MEET STREET T I A L s � BA� aA HARR15 ESIDEN FAMILY - PRODUCT TYPE' s 0 J 0 3 tV 0 \ 0 48 ----- \ •0 �O G 00 ND OF � � �wSS POND S P ROPE NON- RES NO. SOLANA a ,A 9 \ O 10 c° 9 Q �s I o A \ ° N54'27'11"W* 122.86' i m N89'39'47'W 1121.32' WEST N00'10'50"E®V \ 25.00' 4 (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) � p \ J�fi\ w I APPLICANT: MAGUI RE THOMAS PARTNERS NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE SUITE 500 WESTLAKE, TEXAS 76262 (817)430-0303 ENGINEER: BURY & PITTMAN D.F.W., INC. 5310 HARVEST HILL DRIVE SUITE '100 DALLAS', TEXAS 75230 (214)991--0011 LOT 2 �lS LINE 24'15 __L7 69. 5 x VtiORG� n G� � t� Q 2b • �� �04 _1,G LOT l �IU N89'58'39"E 1101.30' e z 9, 0.129 ACRES IN � IN ROAD • w \.' I� a � � � gyp• a S89'58'26 W 23.90' PROPOSED RIGHT-O�-}WAY AN TO THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE v �' C FOR WIDENING OF STREET q' W 0.163 ACRES RESIDENTIAL v' SNVGLE ANLY - PRODUCT TYPE A 35' (Q PP APPROXIMATEO� a fLOCATION OF S89'40'50"E 25.73' 10 AC. BNDY. N AREA FOR P TENTIACa RES IN'1 ��- ANCILLA RYi USES ;�ROAD ,� � ,�• �� icy (C-3 & It-S) (10,-ACREP MAXJ --OHE �6 y N89'08'46"W W N89'07'34"W 25.77' I = O 220.27' S01'27'46"W 48.80' PR D HT -OF -WAY C *'� g EAST DOVE STREET TO THE * SOUTH LAKE cD oo���AeQo 4 7 �- FOR WI N F S REET t4,�c, ya• p ; / , 0 RES * 42 At N 25.00' STREEI 0.163 ACRES � NO0'10'50"E IN ROAD 0.144 ACRES 25.00' IN ROAD 10' TYPE "B" BUFFERYARD REQUIRED 20' TYPE "B" BUFFERYARD PROVIDED REVISED: SEPTEMBER 25, 1995 D O 1 SEP 2 51995 FIGURE 7 LAND PLANNER: THE SWA GROUP 2211 N. LAMA R SUITE 400 DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 (214)954-0016 CASE NO. ZA95-712 Cecil Yates et ux Karen L. Yates Vol. 7142, I'g. 1052 I `I a I, Coy D. Landes, Registered Professional Land Surveyor. 'Texas Registration Q No. 1886, do hereby certify that I have platted the above subdivision from an actual survey on the ground; and that all lot corners, angle points and points x of curves have been properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me Coy D. Landes, R.P.L.S. No. 1986 OF ��. LANDI�L , t' ea 1836'�• ° suw'110 Ann D. Smith Vol. 8420, Pg. 1025 T. EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474 1 Lot 1, Block B Commerce Business Park Vol. 388-214, Pg. 60 tom = 3�el LC = t') 04002' 4 Lot 2, Block B Commerce Business Park Vol. 388-214, Pg. 60 o� OU . 0 5 ..... . T H. 0 Mon. Cod. � 14 S � � --T l State of Texas Vol. 10392, Pg. 1054 \e)G / CQ 0 0& 15' U.E. Vol. 10469, Pg. 2026 I I 3 Sl I R 1 Wo� 00 14.018 30 L. U $ A va" I.Q.r I w N t=1 N N 0 o:V O }i CSI.O K A LEA QI cc N wN (1- LANDES & ASSOCIATES, INC. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS • FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 870-1220 - FAX 870-1292 Lot 1112 34,018 S.H'. 1c U. E. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date: P&Z Secretary: APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Date:.____.____. Mayor: - -- -- City Secretary: Barbara Ann Ward Vol. 3718, Pg. 160 o 50 100 150 200 Scale: 1 " = 50' NOTE: The owners of all corner lots shall maintain sight triangles in accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. Lot 2R, Block B �--POin+ 0-' I�ilnnin9- Southlake Bank Place Vol. 388.181, Pg. 12 I G— S 830' 32' C.0 304 12 L$ I I I I Lot 2, Block A Commerce Business Park. Vol. 388-214, Pg. 60 Avigation Easement and Release STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WHEREAS, Randy L_Pack hereinafter called "Owner" (whether one or more), is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in or within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Tarrant and Denton Counties, Texas, being more particularly described hereon for all purposes: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE and 00/100 ($1.00) DOLLAR, and other gocxi and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed. Owner does hereby waive, release, quitclaim, and forever hold harmless the City of Southlake, Texas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", trom any and all claims for damage of any kind that Owner may now have or may hereinafter have in the future by reasom of the passage of all aircraft ("aircraft" being defined for the purposes of this instrument as any contrivance now known or hereinafter, invented, used, or designed for navigation of or flight to the air) by whomsoever owned and operated, in the air space above Owner's property, as hereon before described, and above the surface of Owner's property such noises, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft landing at or taking off from, or operating at or on the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; and Owners do hereby fully having remiss, and release any rtght or cause of action which it may now have or which it may in the future have against the City, whether such claim be for injury to person or damage to property due to noises, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel and lubricant particles, and all the other effects that may be caused or may have been caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off from, or the operation and/or maintenance of aircraft or aircraft engine at or on said Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. It is agreed that this release shall be binding upon the Owners, their heirs and assigns, and successors in interest with regard to said property kicated in or in the extraterritorial jurisdiction ofthe City of Southlake, Tarrant County, ninnmg with the land, and shall be recorded to the Deed Records of Tarrant County or Denton County, as appropriate, Texas. Executed this day of , A.D., 1995. 5, Block B ke Bank Place 88- 176, Pg. 9 SURVEYORS: OWNER: Owner STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § WHEREAS, Randy L. Pack is the sole owner of 1.5619 acres of land being a portion of Lot 1, Block A, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388- 214, Page 60, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said 1.5619 acres of land being a portion of that certain tract of land conveyed to Randy L. Pack, as recorded in Volume 11502, Page 1496, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said 1.5619 acres of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a L&A 1/2 inch iron rod set in the east line of I,ot 1, Block A of said addition from which the original northeast corner of said Lot 1 bears N 00- 18' W, 14.78 feet; said 1/2 inch iron being the southeast corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to the State of Texas, as recorded in Volume 10392, Page 1054, Tarrant County Deed Records, also being the south ROW line of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), a variable width ROW; and said iron rod also being in the west line of Lot 1R, Block B, Southlake Bank Place, an addition to the City of Southlake, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388/181, Page 12, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 00. 18' 13" E, along the east line of said I-,ot 1 and the west line of said Lot 1R, 261.15 feet to a L&A 1/2 inch iron rod set at the southeast corner of said Lot 1 and the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block A of said Commerce Business Park Addition; THENCE S 88 ° 30' 32" W, along the common line of said Lot 1 & Lot 2, 304.12 feet to a L&A 1/2 inch iron rod found in the east row line of Commerce Street (56 feet in width); THENCE N 01 ° 29' 28" W, along said east ROW line and the west line of said lot 1, 51.10 feet to a L&A 1/2 inch iron rod found at the beginning of a curve to the left whose radius Is 378.00 feet and whose long chord bears N 04. 02' 42" W, 33.69 feet; THENCE continuing along said ROW line and said lot line, along said curve to the left in a northerly direction through a central angle of 05 ° 06' 2811, an arc distance of 33.70 feet to a L&A 1/2 inch iron rod found at the end of said curve; THENCE N 06` 35' 56" W, continuing along said ROW line and west line of said lot 1, 86.99 feet to a T.H.D. monument found at the southwest corner of the aforementioned State of Texas tract also being the south ROW line of aforementioned Southlake Blvd; THENCE N 71. 06' 12" E, leaving the ROW line of said Commerce Street and west line of Lot 1., along the south line of said State of Texas tract (same being the south ROW line of said Southlake Blvd.), 186.41 feet to a T.H.D. monument found; THENCE N 74. 58' 10" E, continuing along said line, 144.94 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.5619 acres of land. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT I, Randy L. Pack, being the sole owner do adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as Lot 1111 and 1R2, Block A, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate to the public's use the streets and easements shown thereon. This plat does not alter or remove existing deed restrictions or covenants, if any, on the property. Executed this day of 1995. RANDY L. PACK STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Randy L. Pack, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above - and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein expressed. Given Uner My Hand and Seal of Office on this the day of 1995. Notary Public in and for the State Of Texas My Commission Expires THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN CABINET SLIDE # DATE: PLAT REVISION LOTS I R I& I R2, BLOCK A COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK An addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, containing 1.5619 acres of land and being a replat of a portion of Lot 1, Block A, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 60, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, situated in the T. Easter Survey, Abstract no. 474, Tarrant County, Texas. Date: 8/29/95 1107 E. FIRST STREET Landes & Assoc., Inc. 1107 E. 1 st Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 (817) 870-1220 (817) 870-1292 Fax Randy Pack P.O. Box 3049 Grapevine, Texas 76099-3049 (817) 421-8787 ZA9s�9 O 951/():� i 1/8' = I'-m' OWNER: DR. TIM HUCKABEE 2000 E. N.W. PARKWAY SOUTHLAKE', TEXAS 76092 ARCHITECT: HUCKABEE 8 ASSOCIATES INC. P. 0. DRAWER 611 STEPHENVILLE, TEXAS 76401 �ITF DATA SUMMARY : 1.) EXISTING ZONING THIS TRACT 2.) GROSS ACREAGE: 3.) BUILDING SITE COVERAGE 4.) SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT: 5.) PARKING REQUIRED: DENTAL CLINIC #1 CALC. 1800 S.F. -1000 +8 = 14 150 DENTAL CLINIC #2 CALC. 1916 S.F. -1000 +8 = 15 150 MEDICAL CLINIC #3 CALC. 1800 S.F. -1000 -8 = 14 150 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 43 61 PARKING PROVIDED: 43 7.) NO OUTSIDE STORAGE ON SITE: 8.) NO EXTERIOR AUDITORY DEVICES ON BUILDING OR SITE: 9.) OPEN AREA: 10.) OPEN SPACE AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE SITE: "OI" OFFICE .908 AG, 15% CONSTR. TO BEGIN OCT. 1995 IN A SINGLE BUILDING PHASE. NOTE: IF MEDICAL CLINICS #1 81 #2 ARE COMBINED INTO I CLINIC SPACE, THE PARKING CALC. WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: MEDICAL CLINIC CALC. 3716 S.F. -1000 +8 = 27 150 DENTAL CLINIC CALC. 1800 S.F. -1000 +8 = 14 150 TOTAL REQ. PARKING = 39 33,()'43 SO. FT. 85% � �- vv.ncnG 1 T Inwl AL. I Nr 1 P S o r i1AAG/'1G ITI nAI Ct11Al/_I CC. BUILDING DESIGN CRITERIA: I.) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF OPEN SPACE: 2.) PERCENTAGE OF OVERALL SITE: 3.) BUILDING AREA 4.) NUMBER OF STORIES: 5.) HEIGHT OF BLDG.: 6.) HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION: 1 7.) VERTICAL ARTICULATION: REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED AREA PROVIDED GROUND COVER CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SHRUBS 2962 SO. FT. 5052 SO. FT. 300 SO. FT. 5 10 50 REQUIRED BUFFERYARDS REQUIRED PROVIDED CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SHRUBS NORTH- 141' 20' - M 20' - M 5 3 20 EAST- 238" 10'- FI 10'- F1 7 14 19 SOUTH- 165' 10' - FI 10' - FI 5 10 13 WEST- 217' 10' - F1 10 - F1 7 } 24 of - INLET EXISTINCs 12' TE MINLET 20'-0' TYPE 'M' 5UFFERYA. j I EXISTING FIRE HYDRAN BUILDING SIGN 10'-0' UTILITY E SEMENT 1'-4" X 8' - C' X 8'-0' TALL z 1 TO CS , P.P. _ �. ;..__ 1.._ .P.L..164.93' (81 5 3(d' E ? S 5 ,j PROPOSED WATER I METER LOCATION Y E ER L � x COMMON 1 I ��, KI ^��E� ,y '. ` r {, Z,�' { x r. ''r � t •rs.;+.sr _-�_. _..-..,. - --- I �r� EASEMENT I ' I 1 PARtKIW3 �,y,� ��: '�� r 33,703 SO, FT. 85 % 5925 SO. FT. ONE 16'-6 FACADE HEIGHT 9'-0' MAX. HORIZ. FACADE LENGTH 27' (3 TIMES HEIGHT) MIN. HORIZ,OFFSET 1.'35' ( 15% OF HEIGHT) MAX. LENGTH OF OFFSET IS 25% OF THE ADJACENT PLANE (EITHER SIDE)(ADJ. PLANE IS 27' LONG 6.75' MAX. VERTICAL FACADE LENGTH 27' (3 TIMES HT.) MIN. VERT. OFFSET 1.35' (15% OF 91 MAX, LENGTH OF OFFSET IS 25% OF THE ADJACENT PLANE ON EITHER SIDE. COMMON GREEN' AREA NO 3 �t M. E. KENNEDY _ 4 ZONED SF-20A ZONED AG �) I 24' WIDE FIRELANE `' >;�c ,; > x,K. ` 61 0 WI _ �_ 0' BUILDING SETBACK LINE_ — 1; ,�' ";� LUD "MIXED. LUD M E D. R E S ASPHALT PAVING ON CALCHE BASE cam,+ cCv U Q I / 9'-0' 2`-6' R �• \\� ' i IU Q W iJ FLOW LINE TE-RIOR L4N05CA ARKINC% ISLAND - iU x i PA INCs 10 CARSCIA TYPE 'F1' E3UFFERYARD ! ! XISTINCs FENCE .9 I �, `•' 1 f LJOOD STOCKADE r ;7, WALL MOUNTED LIGHT (4 T S), 15/ K� \0 W WALL PACK MTD. CONCRETE ILIAC } - 1q -&* ABOVE FI, FLP_ X/�j� ' I fj—�- 1,'. 4L''-0' SIDE YARD % J� CA ,5'-,v 24'- ' 17 x I DENTAL MEDICAL CLINIC MEDICAL CLINIC LEASE CLINIC LEASE / I $ $ 24' LU1DE KIRELANE ►-4. SPACE SPACE SPACE e'-0' i-+IGH F CE 1800 SQ. FT. 1736 SQ. FT. 1800 SO. FT. { �` ON WEST P. L.1 IO�,y I t' Y BRICK WALL 8'-C' X 8'-O' X8'-0'r' I FIN. FLR. ELE V # j l PIGW/( TRASH RECEPTACLE) WITO ( 644'-0" 51Nc.E GATE.) / LAKE CREST I, 10'-C' TYPE 'FI' BUFI�ERYARD #- % CAB. A 3 �- 2'-0' WIDE i # 2 } C'uRls CUTS ' SLIDE 1541 EXISTING 6' 54:j I TARY SEWER 15 1 -0' 51 EYAFZD�. Yr .a j NOTE _ * PARIGINCs 13 GARS GRADE ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF SOUTHLAKE I 55 I T. B. M. - RAILROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE NE CORNER INTERSECTION OF SHADY OAKS DRIVE AND SOUTHLAKE BLVD. ELEVATION - 650,34, . 1 t 1 1 - D �K Pam "P9 S E y�•r'' - � av a x ' ... JQ j • 0 i „- Isis f' Ar -}- so 3 4m b / j .� { . + , ��. y -A. ; >r SITE LOCATION MAP °Kr" NO SCALE LEGEND OF INDICATION CONSECUTIVE DOOR NO. 00'_p" VERTICAL ELEVATION A DOOR TYPE I01 ROOM NUMBER t 1 CONSECUTIVE WINDOW NO. ZL INTERIOR ELEVATION } WINDOW TYPE REVISIONS DATE N0. -ASP ALT PAYING' ON Lam& BA E SE I jPR 06ED SEWER toILINE OCATfON li 2' -0' WI E PARKING 16 CARS 1 RB CUTS ` EXISTI NG 5AN I TARY SEWER MANHOLE 10' TYPE 'F1' BUFFERYARD. BACKYARD LINE S ro0 R. W, E5ER TION F,'-O' HIG+-; FENCE ON SOUTH P. L. FENCE TO BE WOOD 'STOCKADE' M. E. KENNEDY TYPE W/ FINISHED SIDE TO THE ZONED " AG RESIDENTIAL ZONED AREAS. LUD MED.RES --10' UTILITY EASEMENT 1; SITE PLAN _ _ ` NORTH 20'-0" - - _-_ _— _ _ --- 25 AUGUST, 1995 IN 25 0 25 50 ---------------_75 LOT 6 HIRAM GRANDBERRY NO. 581 ADDITION IN THE r HIRAM GRANDBERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 581 SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DETAIL DESIGNATION SECTION DESIGNATION SHEET NUMBER WHERE SECTION CONSECUTIVE DETAIL NUMBER DRAWING 1S PRESENTED 00 _ 00 — 00 H SECTION NO. (section no. are for each individual drawing sheet} 00 SHEET NUMBER WHERE TOeach NUMBER SHOWING WHERE DETAIL IS PRESENTED SECTION DRAWING 'WAS TAKEN APPROVED BY Checked By Title of Project Owner AN OFFICE/DENTAL CLINIC FOR Contractor Crcwn By DR. TIM HUCKABEE SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: CASE NO. ZA95-90 Hucksbee & AALSsocia>tea, Inc. ARCHITECTS & FACILITY Pi-AW-iEPS a 6 u) Z M N Sheet j I 0f VICINITY MAP NITS. ti LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 ROBERT G BROWN MYERS MEADOWS MYERS MEADOW 136,000 S F.) (40,000 S F 1 (69,956 S.F.) JOL 3976, PHASE TWO PHASE ONE 35 PARKING SP 51 PARKING SP 58 PARKING SP DG 12 DRTCT CAB. A, CAB A, SL 1328 1;2"' CAPPED STEEL_ iJ: 413 LF N= 187 LF i N- 124 LF SL 2160 PRTCT COMMON PRIVATE ROD STAMPED "MOAK F_ LF E= 199 �F E= 290 LF OPEN SPACE NO 1 SURV. INC." S= 341 LF S= 144 LF S- 247 LF (ADJ PROPERTY) (ADJ PROPERTY) JV= 199 LF W= 290 LF W= 29C LF (ADJACENT PROPERTY 6 STOCKADE FENCE ♦ .��� AID I�'�l' �1 ....� � / ROBERT G BROWN VOL 3976, PG, 12, D R T C -r► / ZONED. AG ,�� �; •;:: L.U.D.. MIXF D USE t '2" CAPPED STEEL ROD STAMPED "MOAK SURV INC " _ 1U0'-(' STAICK NG DIST. I 0 I DRIVE-- Ql D l o THRu r.:�.t�... I I I I I I RETAIL / �`�:: �:.y,�i..:kz•:.. 1i1•N. a,�`;' +ai :�.K•:f .�;•�*�• r,*„i}t�..?sip ��}��: :. :4 �..r �:� .��„.�i.�.%; :Sl .ai in LOT 3 /(69 FT 50' BUILDING ���♦ i ♦�ON♦♦ ♦ ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦M♦♦� ENTRAYNCE ONL t SPL1T FACE CMU SCREEN WALL I 9 RESTAURANT 51000 SQ. FT. 01 LOT 2 LINE �Q — 49 PARKING SPACES 9 ' O I Cn. �O 3. � � CENTERLINE OF F.M. 1709 EXISTING ZONING FXISITNG LAND USE LAND USE DESIGNATII 3UFFER Y) -NORTH - FAST SOUTH -- C-2 C -2 C-2 A j PUD- NO, R(480-52) PUD- NO R (480-52) MIXED USE _ - _—_ I`.11XED USE- _ _ MIXED 'SSE MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL MIXFr) „Tr= r' USE MIXED USn MIXED USE IMED DENSITY RES MED. DENSITY RES np ,Pv 'rT ACCENT! RF` ACCENTIAC"FN' _ ICANOPY CANOPI IACC'' I+fLS TREES ;.,gJBS REO'D Pl?, TREES - - REO"O I vROV TREES T- "JES RE a PROV - 4 REo REo PR - WHERE PARKING IS PROVIDED BETWEEN THE BUILDING 10"-F1 10 1 12 12 25 25 33'40 1o'-Ft 110' 6 1 11 1b 1, 25 �o_Fi 10' 4 4 / I / 1U 16 x SETBACK LINE AND PUBLIC R.O.W, SHRUBS OBTAINING A � -k — MATURE HEIGHT OF 3' OR GREATER MUST BE PLANTED AT NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE INONE NONE 5'-A NONE 2 NONE 4 NONE 16 IEONE 5'-A NONEI 3 NONE 6 NONE 23 NONE A MINIMUM SPACING OF 30" ON CENTER CONTINUOUS 1— ��._ -- 4 ALONG THE PAVED EDGES OF THE PARKING OR DRIVE 20__0 10'� 14 14 10 10 1 50 20'-0 20' 6 7 4 8 20x 30 20' G0• I 10 11 7 10 35x 4 AREAS. -- r- _7 --�----- 5' - A NONE 2 NONE 4 NONE 16 NONE 5' - A NONE 3 NONE 6 4�ONE 5' - A NONE 3 1 5 6 9 23 AREA CANOPY ACCEN': SHRUBS GROUND AREA CANOPY ACCENT NO AREA CANOPY ACCENT $,+BUDS GROUND 5cTREES TREES COVER ISF) TREES TREES " ISFI TREES TREES COVER ISF I 1 F, 50U 3 5 25 150 2,500 4 - 42 4,400-- - 7 15 73 440 2,672 - 5 19 32 — 200 2,503 t 7 10 Fjl i 2% 5.966 ; 7 15 73 ( 450 MYERS IMEADOVV PHASE TV"I CABINET 4, SLIDF .• ♦♦♦♦INIt • ae �' • SOUTHLAKE BLVD. F.M. 1709 40' X 54' COMMON ACCESS ESMT. LOT 4, BLOCK 1 I LOT 5, BLOCK ' I I i I I I SOUTHLAKE CROSSING SOUTHLAKE CRO._c 25' U'TILFFY EASEMENT PHASE II °HASF I LL L .2j_.LaF� 1 �LL4_.� a T-L T t ZONED '•C-3 �lUi �r -3. L.0 D. MIXED USE L.0 D . MIXED USE • I LOT 6, BLOCK 1 I LOT 7, BLOCK 1 LOT 8, BLOCK 1 L— — — — 1 SOUTHLAKE CROSSING — I SOUTHLAKE CROSSING I SOUTHLAKE CROSSING -I� J PHASE II J PHASE II PHASE II CAB. A, SLIDE 2425 P.R.T C.T. CAB A. S­ IDE 2425 P R T C.T CAB. A, SLIDE 2425 P.R T C ACCESS ESMT. ZONED "C-3" � ZONED "C-3" ZONED "C-3" L U D.: MIXED USE U D MIXED USE L U.D MIXED USE ACCESS ESMT. DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT INHEREAS , DVK (SUT TON) PARTNERS II< L.P., acting by and through JOHN DREWS, PRESIDENT OF DREWS REALTY GROUP, GENERL PARTNERS, its duly authorized agent, is the sole owner of a tract of land situated in the *R. Eaves Survev, Abstract 500, County of Tarrant, according to the deed recorded in volume 7103, page 606, deed records, Tarrant County, Texas, and more particularly described as fol ows of said Joann Sutton Tract and being in the Northwesterly corner right of way BEGINNING at a 3/4 inch steel rod found for the Northeasterly corner line of Farm t.o Market Highway No 1709, said point being North 79 degrees 33 minutes 17 seconds East at 173 30 feet and North 80 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds East at 722.76 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an Addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE, South 51 degrees 17 minutes 40 seconds West with the Southerly boundry line of saia Sutton Tract and said Northwesterly right of way line 835.39 feet to a 1.12 capped steel rod stamped "Moak Sury Inc." for the Southerly corner of said Joann Sutton Tract: same: THEfdCE, North 08 degrees 35 minutes 12 seconds West with Westerly boundry line of said Sutton Tract 403.98 feet to a 112 inch capped steel rod stamped "Moak Sury Inc " for the Northwesterly corner of THENCE, North 80 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds East with the Northerly boundry line of said Sutton Tract 722,76 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3.351 Acres of land, more or less as surveyed by David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc during the month of June, 1995 D SEP 2 51995 D CONCEPT PLAN FOR f)- SOUTHLAKERETAIL CENTER, LOTS 1,2,3, W.R. EAVES NO. 500 ADDITION, SOUTHIAIE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING 3.351 ACRES IN THE W.R. EAVES SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 500 SCALE 1"=30'-{Y' 60' 30' 0 60' I20' LANDSCAPE LEGEND CANOPY TREE (RED OAK, LIVE OW • 19 CANOPY-LPTTERLOR LANDSCAPE AREA • 60 CANOPY -BUFFER YARD LANDSCAPE A TOTAL UNDER STORY TREE (CRAPEMYTLE, YAUPON HOLLY)) • 44 UNDER SPORY-WiERLOR LANDSCAPE AREA o 84 UNDER STORY -BUFFER YARD LANDSCAPE 128 TOTAL SHRUBS (RED TIP PHOTINIA, TAN JUNIPER, BURFORD HOLLY) * 166 SHRUBS -INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA * 236 SHRUBS -BUFFER YARD LANDSCAPE 402 TOTAL BUFFWARD INTERIOR YARD i MYERS MEADOW POINT OF PHASE ONE .;a.;. ". •.0 •>''��~ BEGII�INING - i', CABINET A, SLIDE 1328 1,:,: �;�►' / COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 110. 1 ZONED, PUD- NO 4(480-52) �;: `` •�t.•y.. L U D . MEDIUM DENSIT" RESIDE[,ITIAL .1. 10' UTIL EASEMENT 3/4" STEEL ROD BEING N 79D 33'17'' E AT 173.30 EXISTING TREFS FEE 1 AND N80D 12'25' E AT 72276 FEET FROM TO REMAIN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CORPJER ADD:T.ON DATE OF PREPARATION: SEPTEMBER 6, 1995 DEVELOPMENT BY: DKV (SUTTON) PARTNERS H, L.D. JOHN REWDREWS PREALTY RGE.SRIDEI�TGENERAL PARTNERS 5440 HARVESTHILL ROAD, SUITE 150 DALLAS, TEXAS 75230 214-490-3977 COLLINS / REINSENBICHLER ARCHITECTS 5910 N. CENTRAL EXPWY PREMIER PLACE SUITE 100 DALLAS, TEXAS 75206 NORTH PHONE: 214-987-5000 FAX: 214-987-5001 CASE NO. ZA 95-85 SHEET A-2 FOR MFP AND STYLE a—_aaaaaaa�—��_,_� ,_ate —__--II!, -- - —� ____ --- -- ,ia--w.:� . wow ------- .:. -- am AMI �_ --- _,_.- a_a� �.00010 CUSTOM _am • • a—aa_ a_a_ • • _--__ __i __ w_��s ____ .... •-ii` yam= __IYi_.___ ____ S. NEON SIGN • m= _ __I •—_--- _ — ��—a- 'How or THE oR*v6%: GPAmo �a ;• . © o DESCRIPTION AND ANODUM TALL. TREE GREEN 20, COLUMN BASF -WEATHERED LIMESTj 'PALOMW CHOPPED - CUSTOM mal -- . _. ----. -- -- .--ams �-_ DALLAS, TEXAS = ==_ == =�= = _=_= _ =_—______= _____----========�-=====�===== -- - - -- - ----- - ------ - ----It1t1111111N1111111111111— -- _ --_— --_ _— =— =--------""—'—_-^== === ��- __ -- == _===___�_ ___� =__-_____------------------------__--•_____—_— ____ ===—rr =___� __Mamas --- =- ____= __=—===r r= __ =z= •a. ------ ==== === --ammme -- --___ _---___=_ ___ - --- -- - -- ama --ammms --=__ ------------------ __ -_= - -- --- -- =��_ --• ----------------- -------------------___- --- -- ----• ----• ----•-------------- ----------------'- dafta=a ---• -- ----• ---� — --=----= --=------- === -- -- — -- - _ - -- __ _-= ___-- -= ��------= ---� --- ---- =-_ -___ -___ __- =_=__-___ ---• ---• ----• •---•=- _ =__ =_- _ ----- --- =__-_= -__= ---- = =-_ =___ =-_= ----• •---• �•---•ame _______ ---- __ _- —_-__ =__ == = __=-_= __=_ =-== =s =--_ -_ =_-_ -- -- -- -- —--------- ______------------------- ------------------ ---• 1 � o ATION —___• —_—�•• —_--_— _— ==_— =__—__---------•-----_—___-__________________ •__• •_•_• i •___• •.__• _ ------------------_---- _—_—_--_—_--_----_ .._..._.. ....__. -- �� --r—_ �- -- �� -- •---•—_________=_—____________ __________________________-_-___-_-_-_------_---------- _- _-.-.-, _--------r—•--___—r—_.00 - s .. i■___ __ __ •• __-_---_-__---_-------- --- ■_►..-_•_• -___• •___• •___■----__--_ -- •- _ _----- - 1 —___-_- _-r_--_-_--r---_ - -- __ __ —_ ••--.— -- -- - -- __ - •___■ Mae owmas �� ..•__•• ', O •___• © •.. _■ ..11+ O •__•• © --- __ ---- ---------- '--_---_-___----•-_----_-_� •_-_1 sawams________ _ _-_ I _ •--______--__ - - I �-.-__-__-- mama __- __-- C •----•----•---� r •-- ----• _ ____ _____ _______ - -_ -___ __----------------------------------- a,* __ _low "moli I 1 I VICINITY Mir N.T.S. r Ex. 15' DRNG. / ac UTIL. ESMT. OT 2, BLOCK 1 lvz_ CORNER ADDITION / Iz- / CAB. A, SLIDE 981, P.R.T.C.T. / Ex. 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT / LOT 1, BLOCK 1 CORNER ADDITION CAB. A, SLIDE 981, P.R.T.C.T. Y// i EX. 15' DRNG. / k UTIL ESMT. 1 25' COMON ACCESS ESMT. i APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: ----. - CHAIRMAN: -------- --- -- - - - - - - P 8 Z SECRETARY: -- APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: ------------- ----- - --- _ - MAYOR: -- - CITY SECRETARY: - _--.- - - - HAROLD SAUNDERS VOL. 7232, PG. 428, D.R.T.C.T. 34' DRAINAGE do UTILITY EASEMENT i23 CO A� \ �T \ 9 OA V � /B6 S,p9c ROBERT G. BROWN 0 � VOL. 3976, PG. 12, D.R.T.C.T. MYERS MEADOW PHASE TWO CABINET A, SLIDE 2160, P.R.T.C.T. EX. 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT /4, 10' UTILITY EASEMENT / VOL. PG. D.R.T.C.T. 1/2" CAPPED STEEL ROD STAMPED "MOAK �\ 19 a �S• EX. 15' UTILM ESMT /�• �j. R l pC A y,. VOL. 11077, PG 168, DDT / \O• 1 /2- C APPF-r s-EF- - ROD STAMPED "MOAK SURV. INC." / „h LOT 3 " o / 3 0(b (69,956 SQ. FT.) b LOT 2 N (40,000 SQ. FT.) � m M / 2 5' UTIL. ESMT. COMMON ACCESS EASEMENT - 50' BUILDING LINE d t �20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 310. 78' I �I 3 0 n LOT 4, BLOCK 1 OUTHLAKE CROSSING, PHASE II &NET A, SLIDE 1614, P.R.T.C.T. I by and through 1RTNER, its du 1 y autho-ized agent, is the sole owner of a tract of land situated in the W.R. ^eves Survey, Abstract SOO, County of Tarrant, according to the deed-ecorded in Volume 7103, Page 606, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 3i4 inch steel rod found for the Northeasterly corner of said Sutton Tract and being in the Northwesterly right of way line of Farm to Market Highw 1709, said point being North 79 degrees 33 minutes 17 second fast at 173.30 feet and North 80 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds East at 722.76 feet from the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Corner Addition, an Addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 981, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 51 degrees 17 minutes 40 seconds West with the Southerly boundary line of said Sutton Tract and said Northwesterly right of way line 835.39 feet to a 1i2 inch capped steel rod stamped "Moak Surv. Inc." for the Southerly corner of said Joann Sutton Tract: THENCE North 08 degrees 35 minutes 12 seconds West with the Westerly boundary 1 i ne of said Sutton Tract 403.98 feet to a 1/2 inch capped steel rod stamped "Moak Surv. Inc." for the Northwesterly corner of same: THENCE North 80 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds East with the Northerly boundary line of said Sutton Tract 722.76 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3.351 Acres of land, more or less as surveyed by David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc. during the month of June, 1995. LOT 5, BLOCK 1 F� /2 N �6 a; 3 O g�2 N LOT 1 RT' (36,000 SQ. FT.) z 40'Z 54' COMMON ACCESS ESMT. I 20' 20' 1 1O'UTIL. ESMT. 163. 55' S 5 / a ! 7' 40" W - 835. 39' NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, DKV (SUTTON) PARTNERS I I , L. P. , acting bg and through JOHN CREWS, PRESIDENT OF CREWS REALTY GROUP, GENERAL PARTNER, its duly authorized agent, does hereby adopt this plat designating the here i nabove described property as LOTS 1, 2 and 3, W. R. EAVES NO. 500 ADDITION, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and I do hereby dedicate the streets and easements shown thereon to the public's use unless otherwise noted. WITNESS my hand at Southlake, Tarrant Courty, Texas this the -------- day of ---------' 1995. Johns President STATE OF TEXAS: COUNTY OF TARRANT: BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on•'this date personally appeared, John Crews, President of Crews Realty Group, General Partner of DKV ( Sutton) Partners I I , L. P. , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration expressed and in the capacity stated, and as the act and deed of said Partnership. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the --------day of ----------------' 19----' ------------------------------------ Notary Public for the State of Texas Printed Name: ------------------------ Mg commission Expires: --------------- QENTER' IN y�l ST-5QUT- LAKE BOULEVA -P, CE M. 1709) _ -- WEST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (F.M. 1709) (130' R.O.W.) - 25' COMMON ACCESS ESMT. - 25' UTILITY ESMT. SOUTHLAKE JCI T VENTURE VOLUME 7675, PAGE 1133, D.R.T.C.T. JOHN DREWS, RESIDENT APPROVED SOUTHLAKE C OSSING, PHASE TWO LOT 6, BLOCK 1 LOT 7, BLOCK 1 r 50 0 50 100 150 GRAPHIC SCALE - FEET GOMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE #1 MYERS MEADOW PHASE ONE CABINET A, SLIDE 1328 (5-10-93) P.R.T. C.T. 36 1. 06' 10' UTILITY ESMT., CAB. A, SLIDE 1328, PRTCT POINT OF BEGINNING 3;'4" STEEL ROD BEING N 79'33'17" E AT 173.30 FEET AND N 80.12'25" E AT 722.76 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CORNER ADDITION N to 3 O - ------------ 50' BUILDING LINE _ LOT 8, BLOCK 1 i PLAT SHOWING LOT 11 2 AND 3, W.R. EAVES No. 500 ADDITION ALSO BEING A NOTES: 3.351 ACRE TRACT THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR SITUATED IN THE ELEVATIONS ON ANY LOT CONTAINED WITHIN THIS ADDITION. THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THE W. R . EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 500 PLAT IS FILED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ADDITIONAL LOTS, OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN, MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR CRITERIA. IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. THIS PLAT IS FILED IN CABINET SLIDE - . DATED "Case No. ZA 95-70" OWNER/DEVELOPER; DKV (SUTTON) PARTNERS II, L.P. This Is to certify that 1, Dovid W. Myers, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor DRIB'WSREALTY GROUP, GENZRAL PARTNER f., the Sate of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from a actual survey on the JOHNDREWS, PRESIDENT ground: and that oil lot corners, and angle points, and points of curve shall be properly 5440 HARVEST HILL ROAD, SUITE 150 marked on the ground, and that this plot accurately represents that survey made by me or DALLAS, TEXAS75230 under my direction and supervision. (214) 490-3977 ENGINEER WASHINGTON do ASSOCIATES, INC. SCALE I' ' 50' David W. Myers, RPLS 4565 REVISED 9-13-1995 ADD ESMT ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 500 GRAPEVINE HIVY. SUITE 375HURST, LEGEND DAV/D C, MOW( TEXAS 76054 Sur Veyor s, /n C(817) • FOUND STEEL ROD0 485-0707 METRO 498--3077 SET CAPPED STEEL ROD Lj REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL + CROSS CUT IN CONCRETE LAND SURVEYORS FOUND STEEL PIPE P•0• BOX 1034 (817) 268-2211 REVISED 8-04-1995 ❑ FOUND BOIS D' ARC STAKE HURST, TEXAS 76053 REVISED 7-27-1995 --)1- POWER OR TELEPHONE LINE REVISED 7-19-1995 --- CENTERLINE FENCE 6-08-1995 SO8+* 95-155-3 0 r a Q J a F, ZONING �S�QG• I ZONING 9�py• • r< 1 B -1 •,\. �` SIB � LOT 1 I ZONING sal+ A351 1 , N O T E S 1. LOT 1, BLOCK 1, FARRAR ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1539, P.R.T.C.T. IS PROPOSED TO BE VACATED AND ALL THE EASEMENTS SHOWN THEREON TO BE ABANDONED. THIS PROPERTY WILL BE REPLATTED AS A PART OF THIS REVISED OVERALL PLAT AND NEW EASEMENTS WILL BE DEDICATED AS NEEDED. 2. THERE ARE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE EASEMENTS TO TEXAS POWER & LIGHT CO. AND TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. WHICH WILL BE ABANDONED AND NEW UTILITY EASEMENTS DEDICATED WITH THE FINAL PLAT(S). 3. A 70' PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IS BEING PROPOSED FOR VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE FOR A t�ts�pL'� COMMERCIAL COLLECTOR STREET. 4. THE WAL*MART SITE (LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FARRAR ADDITION) IS ISOLATED FROM THIS SITE BY THE 100 50 0 100 200 RECENTLY IMPROVED DRAINAGE CHANNEL SO NO "ACCESS POINTS" ARE PROPOSED TO THE EAST. B-1 00D 30.' �$5 ?G- A 50' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT (PRIVATE STREET CONNECTION) IS PROPOSED TO THE SCALE FEET LOT 2 0 0ti' S�� �3a' C-3 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO THE WEST. $gtA to p� �' BB 5. 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES BASE UPON .,( .ALF: 1 = i I 0 tPg�vpL' 3 FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS. BONITA ALMON ZONING � -2 I I BONITA ALMON BLOCK C I I ZONING BONITA ALMON LOT A I I C- 2 I • BLOCK B ZONING LOT B I C 2 I JAMES E. BYERS CAROL JEAN WILLIAMS \ BLOCK e VOL. 8516, PG. 595, D.R.T.C.T \\ ` , ��\ ���• NO LOT A I ZONINGRT _ C-3 I _ �S- I BLOT A LOCK A T - N89 39 41 E _ 760.51 �• j G ) I _ _ � _ 7 220 R 0. 14� A y; W. ---DELTA 08'53 44 - ---- - _ _ 556.79' PROPOSED 10' UTILITY EASEMENT- ' `-�_ RADIUS- 1� R= 5390.52' S1.04' � _ - I S54'14'21 "E � _ _ _ TANGENT = 454.24' _------ _ s4o ' 02 50, CHORD - 905.7Y _ - °. S G. IN PROP CHO BRG = N78'1416 E- 1 \ � aOo \\ S78. 3' f \ _u=� f� o, OOp;�A= 70 8 -- --------`, _--- P''` • D o� •,� S 533 7 E LOT 4 °',--_- ' �\ Unv 3.124 Ac. P y� 1 D452.=O�SETO.UR�,Q�, n0 _E </ _ - - - 3F T 0�' �50 DBL G. UNE \ 9° y0 I I DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION I I �� _ \ P ,;�• ,� ��j0� I / I / VOL. 6812, PG. 2108, D.R.T.C.T I I I ^ o/ LOT 4 (CALLED 0.703 Ac.) 1 , , _ ,� (b• o P�, �` 3.347 Ac. 91 - i �20' , 4 PROP I - Ln 1s3g0 s $� I I .'.''1 , I N A / m / ` �; _ - _ �_�2' ac I= 1 0 PROPOSED 20' S 6,5 n I 44- DRAINAGE ESMTco i li\ - 1 I N l `_ �111115450 °S'F 131.6g • r-�- -1- - - -� 15' U/E IQ 0 141�: BLOCK � CO LIN�� Ex. 1Q" - 9RGE >,dNfl _ - - - - `�` I rnl0 ZONING h� o 441 ,-', �------- -I -- - '�--------- < •,_,�'.--.\•.- I to C-304 � V ^ � � r; ;'•; 1:.=-' i I I �% / r I • ,, ,;�- _ , LOT 3 16.889 Ac. � I I BILLIE N. FARRAR � ,� . \ \� � • '-' ;;:. `:';;:•' � II � CAROL JEAN WILLIAMS I `\�, I II I BLOCK 1, LOT 2 VOL. 8516, PG. 595, D.R.T.C.T O I TO FARRAR ADDITION O JAMES P. FARRAR, ET. AL. Z I ( I VOL. 11528, PG. 825, D.R.T.C.T. N o� '^ li WAL*MART STORES, INC. ' - _ _ ; - _ ' � OLUME 11537 PAGE 401 N I I a ,� A PORTION OF 69.14 Ac. ► - - 11 „ _ - - _ I I ~ 23.958 ACRES u_ ,� � I \\ �OSEp 30. ACAW I BLOCK Q \\\\ S S esMT i I L ZONING ZONING I I w o ZONING \ I I Q C 3 �• • f iI iI1 I C-3 �\\\ \ I, 00 z C-3 P.U.D. P.U.D. 206 LO N I 1 MIXED USE MIXED USE LOT 3 1 1 "VILLAGE CEN TER" "VILLAGE CENTER" ooI 0, 13.140 Ac. L\\ I I I 0 1 I M o �G �\ J I I I 'EXISTING WAL*MART I cal ww I �J------------ -------------------__ NI- - I I �\,`, / I I PROPOSED 50' ACCESS ESMT. 00 rn 1 to O) \ \ �I (� Q 1 S8_9'55'47"E 1 "' �' \ I I -- - - - -- -- R =_3.�.------- -ice i~ ... .�._ ...........3.?�•98' I I '-° A 134 1 ' --------------------------- - - - - -- � Li �_ 4 . 96 3 3r _ S89'S5'47 E ``' I W 589'55'47"E 5 00' N89'S5'47" I ;.� ;� 1 S89'S5'47"E PROPOSED 30' ACCESS ESMT. I I 0 �� IW I I 25.34'---120.69, �� ��-- --.••.------------- -- I i $I �I I I I 1 0 o f 165.00' - -� -- 173.95' I I o O I A=53.4 ' /1 I/ 1 w l0 OI 1 6 I {A �1 I0 lb I I in u7 R =100 00' ACREAGE SUMMARY ALL PROPERTY ZONED C-3 & PLANNED FOR RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES. SMALLER LOTS PAD SITE ARE PLANNED FOR RESTAURANTS OR A BANK. BLOCK 1 LOT 1 0.713 Ac. LOT 2 0.740 Ac. LOT 3 13.410 Ac. LOT 4 3.347 Ac. 18.210 Ac. 2 3.9 91 Ac. 2.003 Ac. 0.124 Ac. 44.328 Ac. Nl �i i 1 N I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I l (' Q I �V 001 I LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 1 �pl o FARRAR ADDITION �r b I d U < LOT 2 O O I LOT 1 W I w I M I O W i I \y \ I w N0 i N$I i$ CA13. P R.T.C.T 1539 2.090 AC. e6 1.888 Ac. o�pl ta0 0.713 Ac. '- 1 r� o'o> O a I o LOT 2 a `� I 1.162 Ac. (11D'SE VACATED & ALL EASEMENTS L I I 1 1 1 ( I a0 Oo I� A=14.89' p O 01 N 0.740 Ac• I � 0 I _ • 0 l 1 V � t0 r+A >�REON A ANDON D 50' BLDG. LINE I I I I -I o $ A=59.87 _ 1 I R=750 0 T-4-r Z I R=750.00' - Z - -- o Z -�-t-- 50 6LID, . LiNE i Q ) I PRO'OSED 20' 1 UTILTY ESMT. I I I a A=59.87'• R=750.00' 7' R=75000 I t A=59.87 APROPOSED 20' UTIUTY ESMT I I (f) ! I LEGAL DESCRIPTION 10. (F.M. 1709) 90U1HLAKE 9LVD. 0 � J J N m � Y N v 0 VICINITY MAP W z 0 ma w� J M BEING 44.328 acres of land situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049 in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, said land also being out of and part of a 69.14 acre tract of land as described in a deed from Billie Nell Farrar to James P. Farrar, Mellisso Farrar Auberty and William Scott Farrar, dated November 17, 1989, and recorded in Volume 9764 Page 311 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, survey made for James P. Farrar by virtue of his request and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 1/2" iron rod found in the North right-of-way line of Farm to Market Rood 1709 (Southlake Blvd.) said point being the northwest corner of a 0.084 acre tract of land as described in a deed from Billie Nell Farrar et. al. to the State of Texas recorded in Volume 9862, Page 226 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being located 65.00 feet North 00 degrees 16 minutes 36 seconds West of the southwest corner of the T. Mahan Survey, for the southwest corner of this described tract. THENCE North 00 degrees 16 minutes 36 seconds West, 1224.50 feet along the west boundary line of described tract and the west boundary line of original 69.14 acre tract, same being the east boundary line of a 57.099 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Alpha Development Corp. recorded in Volume 4726, Page 26 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, to a 1/2" rod found at the base of a fence corner post for the northwest corner of this described tract. THENCE North 89 degrees 39 minutes 41 seconds East 760.51 feet along the north boundary line of described tract and the north boundary line of original 69.14 acre tract, to a concrete monument with brass plate found in the curving south right-of-way line of State Highway 114 (220' right-of-way) for an angle corner of described tract. THENCE South 78 degrees 14 minutes 16 seconds East, 905.73 feet along the long chord of said curve to the left having a delta angle of 08 de rees 53 minutes 44 seconds, a radius of 5839.58 feet, and a tangent of 454.24 feet, to a 1)2" iron rod found for the northeast corner of this described tract same being the northwest corner of a 23.958 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. recorded in Volume 11537, Page 401 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. THENCE South 00 degrees 16 minutes 48 seconds East, 1046.38 feet along the east boundary line of described tract and the west boundary line of said 23.958 acre right-of- way line of Farm to Market Road 1709 (Southlake Boulevard),for the southeast corner of this described tract. THENCE North 89 degrees 55 minutes 47 seconds West, 1646.42 feet along the south boundary line of described tract and the north right-of-way line of Form to Market Road 1709 (Southlake Boulevard), to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 44.328 acres of land. A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 2 VILLAGE CENTER z - - f-------,c37882-__- -_��- T-65.23-585a�"�--- 90 R=7so._oo _1 BEING A 44.328 ACRE ADDITION OUT OF THE -1-20.05'- - �g5.- �'---- ►-------=t- - -- --- - - - - -� I i �__- -- 70.00' _-- - - - - _ 21 "E 28.94' 160.00' 283 52' Ex. ,2' w 2' ROW DEDICATION (FUTURE ACCELERATION LANE) ��• �� 12' ROW DEDICATION FUTURRATION -LANE) - 2586.67' --� -_ -- - - - - EX. t1• FORCE MAIN---1058.os'--� TO W. ROW OF KIMBALL AVE. T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 10499 N89.4 55 7 W PROPOSED 1646.42' --J - - --- POINT TRAFFIC IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS. BEOGINNIING APPROX. ±430.00' SIGNAL SOUTHLIAI�E BLVD (F M 1709 a rw1 A � --1 A �20' DIAMOND Imo- 15 U/E tp Cw SHAMROCK } I O 3 I A��l 3 0 �0-4 QG g ° � � I a 513 ZONING ZONING �9j� 1� ZONING I 0 ��t �56, ZONING p� 88 C-2 C-2 19 0-1 I S C-1 4tg 3 p11 SL U v0I'' A$ �� �p0��pti• � C T • r\ r\ • \ , T ,. , , • . T Y r. - T 7 - - - - -115' U/E I ZONING ZONING X AG AG I I W : N W U W 2 11 C' LO a 07 Q U af u7 z u7 1-- N tL M � J O �> W� J 130' R.O.W. 90' P VM T. ZONING AG o O Qfo M u7 M W 6 N tl U � � N Q � 2 J U � O 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS JUNE 26, 1995 REVISED OCTOBER 5, 1995 - PER CITY COUNCIL CONCERNS ZONING B-1 I` U N Z DEVELOPER: Q THE MIDLAND DEVELOPMENT GROUP O WESTPARK I, SUITE 200 L 12655 OLIVE BOULEVARD Cn 00 ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63141 Q ATTN: DONALD SILVERMAN Oj TEL (314)576-1900 (214)980-8806 0 FAX (314)576-7005 (214)980-8789 OWNER: JAMES FARRAR, ET. AL. C/O FARRAR REAL ESTATE 600 WEST PARK ROW ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76020 TEL (817)277-4411 CASE NO. ZA 95-76 JBM ENGINEERS & PLANNERS 2630 W. FREEWAY SUITE 100 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 429-7560 ' It T-UJT-- OCT a 5 1995 ui ■2ft-912 1 " = 5 0' 0 10 20 30 40 SO 73 100 g.,apJ4�� ,CxL& i,, 1.t 1 1.0 ac RICHARD A. REUTLINGER 8661 N. 165th EAST AVE. OWASSO, OK. 74055 Rec. in Vol. 8226, Pg. 989 0 112" CAP FIR ' MOAK" CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CITY OF KELLER CITY COUNCIL SOUTHLAKE, J TEXAS APPROVAL DATE MAYOR SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS APPROVA,L DATE CHAI MAN SECRETARY 0 N 89' 43' 58" E 363.89__ - - - - - - - - - 5' UTILITY EASE ENT 208.89' 155.0' { { II 1{ { { II { C6 inIz w -t LOT 8 �I Iw LOT 7 211�a) � T I� O 0 z I_ b ILn O I in II II I 87,707 sf 64,920 sf I I { it 40' BUILDING LINE II I � 1 55 001 21.17' -' 42' 12 ac WILLIAM & MAY LIPPINCOTT 820 N. SHADY OAK DRIVE SOUTHLAKE, TX. 76092 Rec. in Vol. 6716, Pg. 2481 FIR �I I II I I t I II IIN I I I I� F za) w { � �I Ld � cn I 2 -_ 1.5 ac wI IW JERRY T. Mc CLENDON JI Ir- 2745 UNION CHURCH RD. KELLER, TEXAS 76248 �-I �I _ in Rec. in Vol. 5991, Pg. 612 O UJ 00 - 209_62 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ^—S 89' 37' 06" W -, 364.66' - -�- UNION CHURCH (COUNTY ROAD 78 ac LO i it i i i II P.D.B 112" CAP FIR o 'MOAK" ROAD 42' 21.2.9' 309 9 NEILS T. SORENSEN, TR. 3974 JURUPA AVE. SUITE 302 RIVERSIDE, CA. 92506 Rec. in Vol. 7132, Pg. 2235 0 OWNER/DEVELOPER JOSEPH & KIMIELA MORTAZAVI 2499 UNION CHURCH RD. KELLER, TEXAS 76248 4.5 oc WILLIAM & MAY LIPPINCOTT 820 N. SHADY OAK DRIVE SOUTHLAKE, TX. 76092 Rec. in Vol. 5959, Pg. 622 J. G. ALLEN SURVEY, A- 18 L.A. CLAY SURVEY A-346 SURVEYOR MAKI AND ASSOC., INC. 3521 WEST PIONEER PARKWAY Arlin ton, Texas, 76013 �81 7)261 -81 38 (81 7)261 -8223 fax State of Texas )( County of Tarrant )( We, Joseph Mortazavi and wife Kimiela M. Mortazavi, are the sole owners of a tract of land in the J. G. Allen Survey, A-1 8, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded by deed in Volume 11630, Page 2086 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a capped iron rod stamped "Moak Surv. Inc." at the southeast corner of said tract, said point being by deed call West at 1187.78 feet from the southeast corner of the said Allen survey, said point also being in the north line of Union Church Road ( County Road 3099); THENCE S 89' 37' 06" W along the north line of said Union Church Road, a distance of 364.66 feet to a capped iron rod stamped "Moak Surv. Inc." at the southeast corner of a 1 1 acre tract recorded . in Volume 8226, Page 989, Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE NORTH a distance of 440.15 feet to a found 1 /2" iron rod at the southwest corner of a 12.15 acre tract recorded in Volume 6716, Page 2481 Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89' 43' 58" E a distance of 363.89 feet to a found 1 /2" iron rod at the northwest corner of a 1.5 acre tract recorded in Volume 5991, Page 612, Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 00' 05' 57" E a distance of 439.42 feet to point of beginning containing 3.678 acres or 160,200 square feet of land more or less. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That We Joseph Mortazavi and wife Kimielo M. Mortazavi, being the sole owners, do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as Lot 7 and Lot 8, J. G. ALLEN No. 18 ADDITION, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County Texas and we do hereby dedicate to the public's use the rights - of -way and easements shown. Witness my hand at Arlington, Tarrant County Texas, this the ----- day of -------------------- 1995. -------------------- Joseph Mortazavi ----------------------- Kimielo M. Mortazavi State of Texas )( County of Tarrant )( Before me the undersigned Notary Public in and for said County and State on this day personally appeared Joseph Mortazavi known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the forgoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purpose and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. Given under my hand and seal of office this the - - - - - day of ----------, 1995. -------------------------- Notary Public in and for Tarrant County, Texas -------------------- My Printed Name My Commission Expires: ---------- State of Texas )( County of Tarrant )( Before me the undersigned Notary Public in and for said County and State on this day personally appeared Kimiela M. Mortazavi known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the forgoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purpose and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. Given under my hand and seal of office this the - - - - - day of ----------, 1995• -------------------------- Notary Public in and for Tarrant County, Texas ------------------------ My Printed Name My Commission Expires: ---------- PLAT SHOWING LOT 7 AND LOT 8 J. G. ALLEN No. 18 ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A 3.678 AC TRACT IN THE J. G. ALLEN SURVEY A-18 AUG. 28, 1995 This plat is filed in Cabinet -----, Slide - This is to certify that I, RICHARD C. MAKI, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from on actual survey on the ground; and that all corners, angle points, and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me or under my direction or supervision. RICHARD C. MAKI RPLS #4587 -, Dated !_11.SrL11.2 O SEP 2 51995 LbULD Case No. ZA 95 - 96 '�.? a"ttid.. a,rtt htr •5 �X �-• t aj:,� " { 2 %ar, MARY EVELYN ZEMBFOD VOLUME 3926, PAGE 504, J.R.T.C.T. L.U.D.: MIXED USE ZONED: AG rn � W 1 LOT 20 ` M.A. SCHROETKE ET UX MARTHA T. 211 EASTWOOD DR �< \ aD � � N 1 1 ` Lo � 1 1 �1 LOT 19R ' 001 CARLOS DORRIS ET UX KAREN W. , 213 EAST WOOD/ DR i I , � 1 1 0 a I � I 1 i w CV I 1 I 1 ' LOT 184 0 ' LARRY L. & AVAI FAUGHIA O 215 EASTWOOb DR 1 1 Z 1 1 � `•11 ` 1 1i V) W 7 1 1 z, o � wlLLj 1 e J' J CD1 tD Z a0' 1 ' �6 o 1 a'� Q L01 1IR a'm a Ina w GARY THIkYER ' ' cli z 00 ET UX JOAN P. cv 217 EASTWOOD DR i 000 1 ' M 1 1 w o • --t-- 1 J J 1 0 > 1 1 1 w 1 1 1 1 ' Pei LO-- 16R1 ' 0 GEORG= TUTITLE ET UX CORRINE 219 EA�TWOOD DR r 1 � � I , , 1 1 ,1 O LO T f 5R 0 JOHN A.1 LOGAN !\ ET UX SYSAN B. ' O' 221 EA`.>TWOOD DO O ' � O 1 , , r � � L )T,' 14R ` DENPi$ MINDER,� M ET (A PATTIE, cO 223 EASTWOOD OR GREENWAY INVESTMENTS VOLUME 11557, PAGE 810, D.R.T.C.T. L.U.D.: MIXED USE ZONED: B1 rn W Q I I I 1 , 1 � 1 , I 1 1 I I 1 ! 1 ' ! D,AN V. M' TISE 1 ' ! VOLUME 7509, PAGE�419, D,R.T.C.T.', 1 1 ' L.U!D.: MIXED USE , 1 ' ZONED:, 81 , ' PROPOSED 6" WOODEN FENCE By INDIVDt4AL HOMEO#NERS ' i , r JACK SAUD06 PETTY VOLUME 6364, PAGE 431, D.R.T.C.T. 1,.U.D.: LOW ZtNSITY RESIDENTAL , ,'ZONED: AG rn ) \ I t10�N R. EZEI,L AND WIFE SALLY N.\ EZELL I VOL>t.Jlulj= 17651, PAGE 664, D.R.T.C.T. 1 IL.U.D,i LOW DENSITYY RESIDENTIAL ZONED: 'AG , 11 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 HOWARD CARR i 311 S. OMBALL AVE \ 00 ---- '� 1 0 ' LOT 1 ' ANDREW L. JAMES, JR 305 S. KIMBALL AVE _10' LANDSCAPING AREA • PROP. MASONRY FENCE BY DE LOPER LOT 2 TERESA JANE THOMPSON 395 S. KIMBALL AVE co 00 W _ 3 A60 O _----� .--'LOT 3 - = GERALD W. THOMPSON QQ 405 S. KIMBALL AVE m LOT 4 CARL JOHNSON ET UX MARILYN 495 S. KIMBALL AVE _10' LA DSCAPING AREA PROP. � MASONRY FENCE BY DE 1 PER ` LOT 5 JERRY FORBUS ` ET UX MARY 595, S. KIMBALL AVE Pell ` L0 O O 0 LOT 6 DARRELL G. FAGLIE `�05 S. KIMBALL AVE LOT 7 GARY A. FOX 605 S. KIMBALL AVE I 0 SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING - AG PROPOSED ZONING - SF20A EXISTING LAND USE - AGRICULTURAL CITY OF SOUTHLAKE LAND USE PLAN - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED LAND USE - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TOTAL AREA - 37.416 AC. TOTAL LOTS - 59 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY - 1.58 LOTS/ACRE MINIMUM LOT AREA - 20,000 S.F. MAXIMUM LOT AREA - 43,971 S.F. AVERAGE LOT AREA - 23,024 S.F. 0 SO' 100 200' 300' SCALE IN FEET 1'=100' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BEING all that certain tract, parcel, or lot of land located in the JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, Abstract No. 529, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all those certain tracts of land described to Michael Jacobs in Volume 7180, Page 2351, D.R.T.C.T., described to E.R.O. Development Co., Inc.in Volume 11823, Page 1257, D.R.T.C.T., described to Dwain Petty in Volume 4410, Page 86, D.R.T.C.T., and described to Dwain Milford Petty and wife, Majorie F. Petty in Volume 4113, Page 282. D.R.T.C.T., and more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a 3/8" steel rod found in the west right-of-way line of South Kimball Avenue for the northeast corner of the herein described tract same being the southeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to John R. Ezell and wife Sally N. Ezell in Volume 7651, Page 864, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE S 00'26'46" E, 399.81 feet along said right-of-way to a 5/8" steel rod found; THENCE S 00'22'12" E, along said right-of-way at 182.69 feet passing a 1/2" steel rod with a plastic cap stamped MOAK SURV, INC." set, in all 489.67 feet to a 3/8" steel rod found; THENCE S 00.01'05" E, 333.96 feet along said right-of-way to a 1/2" steel rod with a plastic cap stomped "MOAK SURV, INC." set for the southeast comer of the herein described tract same being the northeast comer of a tract of land conveyed to Jack Sauders Petty in Volume 6364, Page 431, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE S 89.13'21" W, 1319.44 feet to a 1 /4" steel rod found in the east line of Woodland Heights Addition as described in Volume 388-212, Page 56, P.R.T.C.T.; THENCE N 00.07'00" W, 463.71 feet along said east line to a 3/8" steel rod found; THENCE N 00'22'49" W. along the aforesaid east line at 190.77 feet passing a 1/2" steel rod with a plastic cap stamped "MOAK SURV, INC." set, in all 781.75 feet to a 1/2" steel rod found same being the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Greenway Investments, Volume 11557, Page 810, D.R. T.C.T.; THENCE S 89.58'41" E, 590.18 feet along the south line of said Greenway Investment tract to a 5/8" steel rod found some being the southeast corner of the aforesaid Greenway Investment tract and the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Dan V. Motise in Volume 7609, Page 419, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE S 89'41'38" E, 728.90 feet along the south line of said Matise tract to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 37.416 Acres (1,629,863 square feet) of land, more or less. CONCEPT PLAN SOUTHLAKE BLVD. FOR MEAD 0 W RIDGE ES TA TES A 37.416 ACRE TRACT S) TE "< IN THE W �ti ~' REID CITY OF SOUTHLAKE �r RAMBOWTARRANT CO LINTY, TEXAS EXISTING tj ONING: AG PROPOSED ZONING: SF20A DEVELOPER/OPTION HOLDER BRISCOE CLARK COMPANY 8300 DOUGLAS AVENUE SUITE 800, PRESTON PLAZA TOWER DALLAS, TEXAS 75225 (214) 706-9190 CURRENT OWNERS MIKE & GINGER JACOBS E.R.O. DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. DWAIN PETTY 15851 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 240 1309 E. GRAUWYLER 610 S. KIMBALL ROAD DALLAS, TEXAS 75248 IRVING, TEXAS 75061 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 PREPARED BY. WIASHINGTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 500 GRAPEVINE HWY SUITE 375 HURST, TEXAS 76054 (817) 485-0707 METRO 498-3077 SEPTEMBER 1995 JOB NO. 208-001 FILE NAME: PSP8H CASE NO. ZA 95-83