Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1995-11-07 CC Packet
City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 7, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Contract Status for City Hall on the Timarron/Richards Properties The many variables in the Timarron/Richards property acquisitions are quickly coming together. Following are two summaries,one of the current status of the negotiations and second is a summary of the contract issues and terms for each of three acquisitions(the third being the Timarron/Richards Land Swap). SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS (Timarron Land) 1. Contracts for Timarron acquisition have been prepared by Timarron's attorney and reviewed by Wayne Olson of Fielding, Barrett and Taylor(FBT). All significant issues have been worked out by the attorneys. There are a few items that are still being negotiated. We intend to have contracts worked out by the Council meeting on 11/21/95 for your approval. 2. Carter and Burgess are preparing legal descriptions and graphic depictions of the land to be purchased. Final costs will be based on the final surveys. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT ISSUES (Timarron Land) 1. Approximately 8.28 acres total area. (360,676 s.f.) 2. Purchase price of$2.00/sq. ft. (360,676 s.f. x$2.00=$ 721,352 total) 3. Terms: $360,676 at closing Remaining $360,676 shall be used to offset future fees and permit costs of development 4. A 3-way restriction agreement complying with the "Design Guidelines" shall be included. L G:\WPF\PROJECTS\CITYHALL\MOBIL2.WPD City of Southlake,Texas SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS (Richards Land) 1. The contract for the Richards acquisition has been prepared by Wayne Olson of FBT. We are meeting with Dr. Richards and his broker this Friday 11/10/95 at 10:00 a.m. in the morning to give them a copy of the draft contract. The contractual issues have conceptually been worked out in previous meetings. We will need to discuss the "Design Guidelines" offered as restrictions by Timarron as well as the ultimate frontage of land preferred by Timarron. We intend to have contracts worked out by the Council meeting on 11/21/95 for your approval. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT ISSUES(Richards Land) 1. Approximately 7.011 acres total area. (305,399 s.f.) 2. Purchase price of$1.50/sq. ft. (305,399 s.f. x$1.50=$ 458,098.50 Total) 3. Terms: Currently we anticipate the issuance of Certificates of Obligation to fund the entire amount at closing. 4. A 3-way restriction agreement complying with the "Design Guidelines" shall be included. 5. Richards will continue to live on the property for a period of one year. ***********************, *****, *, ***, ******************************************** SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS (Timarron &Richards Lands Swap) 1. This contract has been prepared by Timarron's attorneys. We expect to assist in the negotiations between these two parties. It is my hope and intention to deliver a draft of this land swap contract to Dr. Richards at our meeting this Friday. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT ISSUES (Timarron and Richards Land Swap) 1. Timarron will trade1.98 acres of land to Richards for 1.98 acres of land from Dr. Richards. 2. Dr. Richard's resulting property will be subject to "Design Guidelines" developed by Timarron. 3. A 3-way restriction agreement complying with the "Design Guidelines" shall be included. ******************************************************************************* L G:\WPF\PROJECTS\CITYHALL\MOBIL2.WPD _ _J City of Southlake,Texas SUMMARY OF ALL COSTS* 1. TOTAL COSTS: $1,179,450 2. TOTAL LAND ACQUIRED: City will own 15.29 gross acres (keep in mind that some property will be used to dedicate ROW for the westernmost road so the net acres will be between 13.5 and 15 acres.) 3. EFFECTIVE COST: Summary costs will be $77,138 per acre or$1.77 per square foot. 4. CLOSING: City will need$818,774. *Please keep in mind that these numbers are subject to change pending negotiations with Dr. Richards regarding the land swap areas (not prices)between Timarron and Richards and subject to final surveys of calculated land areas. Please contact me if you have any questions. g./ GL/gl G:\WPF\PROJECTS\CITYHALL\MOBIL2.WPD - =-� . . f,-,,,, , ,,::,0., Traffic Safety • . ,i_ , t , , i , ...i , .,; _. Equipment by Kustom Signals -- ,, here's a good chance we gave you the SMART you've come across a few radar trailer. And when �,, \ ] -12 Kustom products before, you found yourself patrol- perhaps during training at ling alone and your depart- the academy or later when ment under seige by un- you went on active patrol. just lawsuits, we gave you more protection with the Perhaps your cars have EYEWITNESS in-car sur- Kustom equipment. A veillance system. two-piece radar, in fact. It rides along, takes the Our philosophy is simple: - / bumps in the road, and listen to our customers. o EE- ) works when it should. Build top-quality, hard- 1 - PRo c.asER is • Maybe you don't think working equipment. Test ., r - w- I about it much. You have and retest. Maintain our 4— more important matters on reputation for having the which to focus your atten- lowest failure rate in the ., f,,,A!7-,,c„i tion. You might even take industry. And deliver what N your radar for granted. we promise. That makes us smile. Kus- All Kustom radar are 1-1 1 torn equipment should be included on the NHTSA/ I_I _1 that reliable. And when it IACP Consumer Products finally wears out some day List. We work as a team down the road, we'll be with a number of law happy to show you our enforcement agencies to . latest. evaluate specifications, then develop products that Since our first radar was meet or exceed them. released in 1969, we've seen i your needs change. And So take a look through our LIMIT `' " ' '` you've seen our products brochure. If you see some change to meet those thing that could help make, ,20 ! 1 needs. When you wanted your job easier, give us a all-direction radar to get call and we'll send you that ,- YOUR SPEED ®. around tricky medians, we product's individual bro- gave you the H.A.W.K. chure. If you don't see what L {_' :3 When you needed a second you need, let us know. POLICE target lock, we gave you t, �- - the PRO-1000. When you You might start something! O. ® _ needed more manpower, SMART • Traffic SafetyEquipment by Kustom Signals „...c.„ 1111-12 The moving/stationary HR-12 offers EYE Riding shotgun, Eyewitness records the best of both portable and fixed audio and video during a patrol shift for mount systems. When handheld, it is videotaped evidence. A tiny camera light and balanced with all controls at captures the details and the recorder is your fingertips. And when mounted, housed in a bullet-resistant, tamperproof the handheld remote control provides vault mounted inside the trunk. No effortless control of the hold and lock- other system comes close to the level of release functions. Perfect choice for protection offered by the patented vault. agencies that frequently transfer radar Eyewitness industrial-grade components from car to car. include a Camera, Monitor, Recorder, Control Center, Vault, and Wireless PROLASER ProLaser provides pinpoint aiming Microphone, all of which mount in limit- and exact target identification. Using a ed space. Serves and Protects YOU. series of laser light pulses, ProLaser projects both the target speed and H.A.W.K. The unique, two-piece H.A.W.K. was illuminated aiming reticle into a Heads- the first moving radar to deliver com- Up-Display (HUD). The HUD allows plete directional coverage. In both an officer to sight the target, read its moving and stationary modes, the speed, and establish an uninterrupted H.A.W.K. calculates the vehicle speed in tracking history. Because ProLaser front of and behind the patrol vehicle, emits light waves instead of radio opposite and same direction. A stopwatch waves, radar detectors are completely feature is also included. Nothing covers ineffective. Speed enforcement at the more traffic than a H.A.W.K! speed of light twKR 1OSP Like all Kustom two-piece units, the SMART SMART, or Speed Monitoring KR-IOSP has everything you expect in a Awareness Radar Trailer, is a self- radar unit. Accurate, reliable, and easy contained, solar-powered, speed dis- to operate, the KR-10SP features mov- play unit. Designed to promote speed ing/stationary operation, dual direction awareness, SMART is towed to capability, remote control, range control, locations that have experienced fre- circumvention of radar detectors, and quent speed-related problems. Equip- can be made to interface with Eyewit- ped with a Kustom radar, SMART ness. The KR-10SP is available in K-or X- clocks motorists and displays speeds Band frequency. A favorite worldwide. on a large digital display, serving as a friendly reminder to ease up on the gas FALCON The Falcon is found everywhere: patrol pedal. A public relations tool, SMART cars, motorcycles and patrol boats. The can also be used to issue warnings and Falcon is available with a battery pack, or citations. A built-in alarm system dis- you can opt for the internally-powered courages vandalism or theft. A PC- cordless model. The Falcon Marine helps . compatible traffic statistics computer reduce boating accidents and property is available for automated traffic damage, and is available in knots, miles surveys. Voluntary speed compliance; per hour, or tenths of miles per hour. that's SMART! Kustom goes everywhere you need it. PRO-1000 Compact and convenient—two words Accessories •Dual Antenna Kit: antenna, mount, that best describe the PRO-1000. A cables, control boxes, remote control perfect fit for the smaller cars, the PRO- with lock/release and hold. 1000 features a third window target •Giant PR Display. speed lock, providing better target •12 Volt Battery Pack with AC Charger. identification as the unit continues to •Heavy-Duty or Padded Carrying Case. track. For tickets that stand up in court, •Seat Holster. go with a PRO! 'Mounts Deck include Window, Dash, and kg« 9325 Pflumm • Lenexa, Kansas 66215-3347 KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC. .t,, 1:800-4KUSTOM (458-7866) • 913-492-1400 • FAX 913-492-1703 Printed in U.S.A. 10/92 QUOTATION FORM kg KUS OM SIGNALS,, INC. 9325 PQumm.tsMM X5 66215-3347 Date.... 10/26/95 913-492-1400 FAX 913492-1705 Phone... 817-481-5581 To_.. SOT DANIELS Fax #... 817-481-0036 SOOTIII.AKR POLICE DEPT C/P a... 667 N CARROLL AVE Ref #... SOUTULAKE, TX 76092-9595 Quote P. 1528 0208 Option # 01 Quote Expires after 60 Days QUOTATION Re... RFI.. Terms a111 COnattens:Umleas otherwise stated sit kens are Delivery 60 Days ARO FOB Cl nyte.ES,SUBJECT TO aC isace by corporate allies pole*Terse:Net 30 Days,SUBJECT TO prior crealt approval I i '.I I \ i,(1114 t 1)( ,(1 Ilitiull 1 nit �I1111111 1 1 *ULTRA* SMART INCLUDES: BASS SYSTEM, KR-10SP 13655. 00 13,655.00 UPGRADE, AXLE LOCK, SIGN RACK, ALARM, ALUMIIION WBBRiS, CUSTOM STRIPING, comma AND PRINTER. 2 1 STORAGE COVER FOR SMART SYSTEM 250. 01 250.00 3 1 FURNITURE VAN FREIGHT 795. • # 795.00 Lease Purchase Option Total 14,700.00 Term.. 3 YR a 4.43 % Per Yr Pyrt. Ant: 05,550.57 Per YR ** Quote does ROT include any applicable Sales Tax to Signature i' l.r,(. .-w (7, strict Manager Title Jim Fuller (214) 771-3843 PO Box 249 (800) 458-7866 Rockwall, Tx 75087-0249 Toll Free 800-4KUSTOM (800-458-7866) City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 7, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Offer for City Hall on Fechtel/Peterka Property Attached you will find a transmittal letter dated 11/7/95 from Brian Stebbins,potential developer of the Fechtel/Peterka property. The letter includes a "Summary of Terms" for a land acquisition by the City. A summary of the terms is as follows: • Approximately 17 acres total area. • Purchase price of$2.00/sq. ft. (17 x 43,560=740,520 sq. ft x$2.00=$1,481,040 total) • Terms: $1.25 /s.f. at closing ($925,650) Remaining $555,390 shall be paid for as follows: 1. Seller to buy existing 3 acre City Hall site for$3.00/s.f. ($392,040) 2. Remaining$163,350 to be used to offset future fees and permit costs of development • Will require$50,000 of earnest money. Please contact me if you have any questions. GL/gl enc. Summary of Terms from Brian Stebbins dated 11/7/95 c:\WPRPROJECTS\CITYHALLTECHT1.WPD 11—U —y5 11 :UbAM PROM COOPER & CO. TO 18174886?96 P001/00? Facsimile Transmission 2010 Main Street, Suite 1220 Irvine, California 92714 Telephone 714 241-1400 Facsimile 714 251-1440 To: Curtis E. Hawk Gregory D. Last Fax: (817)488-6796 From: Brian R. Stebbins Date: November 7, 1995 Pages: 7 Please find attached our formal letter of offer to the City of Southlake for their purchase of approximately 17 acres. The Terms and Conditions outlined therein reflect those previously given to the City for their attorney's review on Friday, November 3, 1995. By way of separate delivery you were also given a conceptual land plan reflecting the broad uses currently being contemplated on the total 128 site. As you are aware it is our intent to go through the formal process of a PUD to more thoroughly define the future direction of the site,which will hopefully be able to embody a true"City Center"status within the community as a result of having the City's new municipal campus being an integral part. We also took the liberty of adding some representative photographs as to the quality of product we've previously completed at Overton Park Plaza in Fort Worth. We look forward to your response. Regards, Brian R. Stebbins L . l l-U'(-95 11 :U5AM FROM COOPER & CO. TO 181'14886'196 fUU'L/UU'( COOPER & CO. PC.Cooper&Ca Inc.,2010 Main Street.Sunc 1220 twins.CnllNrnl,112714 USA 'kkphnne(21412S1-1404I Feecimtle(714)2S1-1440 November 6, 1995 Mr.Curtis E.Hawk,City Manager Mr.Gregory D.Last,Community Development Director CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,TX 76092 BY: City of Southlake Municipal Campus Dear Curtis and GIeg: As you are aware,during the course of our recent conversations regarding the overall master planning of the approximately 128 acre Fechtel/Peterka site(the"Site") bounded by Highway 114, FM 1709, and Carroll Avenue, the planned relocation of the City of Southlake's (the"City")municipal facilities was raised. During those discussions we confirmed our intent to submit an application on the Site for a Non- Residential Planned Unit Development in due course in order to provide a clearer direction as to land use parameters of the Site's development over the coming years. Pursuant to the City's relocation strategy,however,it was noted that the City's stated desire is to create a quantifiable"Municipal Campus",ideally located whereby the strongest and most favorable impact to the community at large could be made, and perhaps further enhanced by being part of a properly conceived, larger master plan. The conclusion was made that, geographically speaking, no better location existed than that of the Site, but that due to the City's perception as to the Owner's pricing expectations, it was the City's belief that the Site did not represent a viable economic alternative.In any event, discussions on the matter continued to advance and it was ultimately agreed that, conceptually at least, the City's Municipal Campus could in fact be compatible, if not complimentary, to the planned commercial uses intended on the Site by the Owners. As a result of this conclusion, it was represented that efforts would be made immediately to determine pricing flexibility, if any, on behalf of the Owners to advance what could be a mutually beneficial master plan going forward. We have now outlined below a summary of Terms & Conditions agreed with the Owners by which a legal agreement for sale may be advanced. SELLERS Limited Partnerships (to be formed) comprised of Fechtel/Cooper and Peterka/Cooper (collectively,"Sellers"). BUYER The City of Southlake("Buyer"). PROPERTY Approximately 17 acres (the "City Property") located centrally within an approximately 128 acre planned development bounded by FM 1709, Carroll L • • 11-07-95 11 :05AM FROM COOPER 6 CO. TO 18174886796 P003/007 City of Southlake November 6, 1995 Page 2 Avenue and Hwy. 114 in the City of Southlake, Texas (the "Combined Property"). The Combined Property is owned in part by the Fechtels (72.9 acres located at the corner of FM 1709 and Carroll Avenue and referred to herein as the"Fechtel Property")and in part by the Peterkas(approximately 55 acres of adjacent property bounded by FM 1709 and Hwy. 114 and referred to herein as the"Peterka Property"). The City Property is comprised of approximately 7.3 acres of land located on the Peterka Property and an additional approximately 9.7 acres located on the Fechtel Property. PURCHASE PRICE Two Dollars($2.00)per square foot of land,or approximately$1,481,040,to be allocated pro rata between the Fechtel Property (9.7/17 = 57%) and the Peterka Property (7.3/17 = 43%), or approximately $844,193 to the Fechtel/Cooper Limited Partnership and $636,847 to the Peterka/Cooper Limited Partnership. PAYMENT Buyer shall pay approximately One Dollar and Twenty-Five Cents ($1.25) per square foot, or approximately $925,650 in cash at Closing. In addition, Buyer shall receive a credit of up to Seventy-Five Cents ($0.75)per square foot(approximately $555,390)against the purchase price payable to Sellers c for the following items("Credits"), subject to the conditions and limitations set forth below: - approximately $392,040 by the Buyer's conveyance to Sellers of approximately 3 acres of City-owned land along Carroll Ave., near the corner of Carroll Avenue and Hwy. 114 (the"Swap Property"), at an agreed valuation of Three Dollars($3.00)per square foot;and - the balance,of approximately$163,350(but in any event not more than $175,000),by Buyer's provision to Sellers of Credits for future fees and permit costs in connection with the development and improvement of the Combined Property. Credits shall be allocated pro rate between Sellers. Application of Credits against the Purchase Price shall be subject to the following conditions: - Buyer's conveyance of the Swap Property shall be subject to Sellers' acceptance of the same after completion of reasonable and necessary due diligence(title,survey,environmentals, etc.),to be completed during the Contingency Period given to Buyer(described below). - Credits attributable to fees and permit costs shall be made available to Sellers for a period of five(5)years,with Buyer paying Sellers in cash at the expiration of such 5 year period for any remaining(unused)Credits at that time. L 11-07-95 11 :05AM FROM COOPER & CO, TO 18174886796 P004/007 Lr City of Southlake November 6, 1995 Page 3 EARNEST MONEY Fifty Thousand and No/I 00 Dollars($50,000.00). CLOSING Estimated on or before March 31, 1996. TERMS OF SALE "As Is." The City will be responsible for all reports, studies, plans and permits,and shall develop and construct at its own cost and expense any and all infrastructure improvements (on and off-site) which are required or necessary for development and construction of contemplated building or other improvements on the City Property. CONTINGENCIES A. Site subdivision. Sellers' obligation to sell and Buyer's obligation to buy the City Property shall be contingent on Sellers' subdivision of the City Property into separate and transferable parcels. Sellers shall commence such process on mutual execution of purchase and sale agreements for their respective parcels. B. Title. Sellers will be obligated to deliver a preliminary commitment for title insurance as to their respective portions of the City Property within ten(10)days of receipt of approval for the necessary subdivision request described above. Buyer's comments will be due within twenty(20)days of receipt of the preliminary commitment, accompanied by copies of all exceptions noted therein. Sellers will be required to cure any objections prior to removal of contingencies. C. Survey. Sellers will be obligated to deliver a current survey of the City Property within ten (10) days of receipt of approval for the necessary subdivision request described above. Buyer's comments will be due within twenty(20)days of receipt of the survey. Sellers will be required to cure any objections prior to removal of contingencies. D. Buyer's Investigation. Buyer shall have sixty(60) days to complete its investigation of the City Property. If anything is found to be unsatisfactory,Buyer may terminate the agreement in its sole discretion. CLOSING COSTS &PRO-RATIONS A. Closing Costs. In general, costs shall be borne between Buyer and Sellers in accordance with local practice. Sellers shall allocate costs among themselves pro rata. B. Pro Rations. Pro rations shall be done effective as of the date funds are available to Sellers,in accordance with local practice. Pro rations among the Sellers shall be allocated proportionately. • •11-07-95 11:05AM FROM COOPER & CO. TO 18174886796 P005/007 r City of Southlake November 6, 1995 Page 4 In closing,we would express our genuine belief that the City's best alternative for the development of its new Municipal Campus is to the Site nominated herein. The advantages may be summarized as follows: • geographic prominence- which comes as a result of the Site being bounded by two of the most traveled roadways in Southlake,which when taken in context with its centralized location,combines to create a true"front door"to the community • "part of a larger picture"-the successful integration of the City's Municipal Campus into the urban fabric of the overall Planned Unit Development allows mutually beneficial objectives to be achieved. The City creates an environment and image superior in both form and function to that of any other available alternative and the Owners receive the ancillary benefit of having such a facility prominently located on their property • fiscally competitive- the economics of the transaction outlined herein are meant to portray a market driven,and price competitive approach. Specific pricing as to roads, infrastructure,etc. will be able to be more finally estimated once the City's exact requirements are more fully known We look forward to the opportunity of immediately advancing the transaction and would be happy to expand upon any of the points contained herein. Please let us know should you have any questions. (11109 Sincerely, Milton Fechtel,on behalf of the Fechtel family Jeannie Peterka S. VrteZerX.-p— Brian Stebbins,on behalf of Cooper&Co. . •11-07-95 11 :05AM FROM COOPER & CO. TO 18174886796 P006/00? 11467 0 795'-it:t i ='fl-1Oht9Qt FINANCE TO 121455944?0 1005/005 P.5 L City ofSauthiske November d,1995 Page 4 In doming,we would amnia our genuine belief that the Cky's dart eitame dve for the development of Ca new htmdolpai Campos le Win e site eomInated brain. The advantages May be heed ae gapbws: • Rsnrep*e premium.. which oomu as a remit of the take being bounded by two of ea moat traveled am�e' n of kith1 r,which whin taken in*Wind with its aentrelisad loosttan,�lblwe to credo a tree door"to the eommndty • Mpaet of a larger picture'-the successful linagtatlaa of the c tty►'s Municipal Campus into the urban *brio of t u avas+all Plannod Unit Development diowa rtlljr b0nofetalobjhealer to be aibiorad. The City mums an eaviromnad and image superior le both bras and fltneddn to that of any other available alternative lied the Own** t+vih'e dw ancillary benefit of !Nines multi a facility ptominently located an their propety • !leery compaekive-the eoaeonalos of the mummdan outlined herein are meant to portray a marbet Spunk p as to toads, actin,am.will be aide requirements are more Silly known We look i,rwetd to file of immediately advancing the tranaatiai! end vroaid be hippy to expand am anyot'tre points herein. Please let us know ahotdd you have any questions. itincerely, Alos:E4 -1 Nikon Feahtel on behalfof the hefted family leamle Patera Brian Stebblos,het bebullvf'coopnr,e&t:o. , R-99X 2L4 466 7089 11-07-95 10: 12AM P006 #09 , . 11-07-95 11 :05AM FROM COOPER & CO. TO 18174886796 P007/007 JEANNIE 8 CAL PETERKA TEL N0.603-427-0278 Mar 07,32 1 :14 P.02 L City of Smithiaias Novoatber 6, 1995 Pape 4 In closing,we would eoglnea our genuine beliefthatt the City'a beet alternative fee the development of its um Municipal is to the Site nominated herbal. The advantages may be summarized is follows: • seograpi a pantomime- which comes as a reanit of the Site betas bounded by two of the most traveled rotdwaye In SouthIUae,which when taken In context with its oontcaiiand looatian,combine to create a true'Q+ont dooe'to the eommmtity * "pal of a la rker pletarran-the suoaesdbl Integration of the City's Municipal Comm into the urban fabrle of the overall Maimed Unit,Development allows mutually bcncficbd objectives to be sobleval. The City orates en environment end Image superior in both ibmt sad function as thee of any other AvsilahU allernitne• and the Ouewre reouk* the eaeillesy benefit of haring sack a 441l1ty • Saadi,aempedeku-t e vvvpveuive 406e muurandva outlined bends'ass meant tb portray a mute driven,end price eompetidva approach. SpeoUlo pMeind se to rondo,Inftaobruotuav,,ate,win be able eo bo moss unary estimated Cabe t e Ctty's exact repair ements are more filly tcnonin We look forward to he appart ty of immediately advancing the traneactian add Itettld be happy to e xpend upon any of the points contained herein. Please let us know should you have an Sincerely, • Milton Faobtel,Ott behalf of the Redbird&ally hawks leasny.04,04 • Arian stoma,en behalf of Cooper&Co. • R-96% 603 427 0278 11-07-65 10146AM P002 #10 City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 6, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Short Term Space Needs Space needs have been a constant topic of conversation during many staff meetings and with the City Council during the past several years. You have asked me to look into options for providing office space for municipal employees during the next two years, as we work toward the ultimate resolution of the issue. I offer the following information for preliminary discussions. If additional information is needed, I will be happy to conduct any research that may be needed. Why do we need to consider short term options? There seems to be general agreement that a new City Hall is needed and will be built during the foreseeable future. However, there are many details to consider when selecting the site and developing the facility plans (e.g., will there be a separate facility built for public safety? Where? When? Public Works?) In other words, the City Council and staff are faced with a dizzying array of decisions during the coming months. Of course, once decisions are made we will be looking at the many months it will take to actually build the facility. In my opinion, it will be very difficult to move into a new building within the next two years. That is, a permanent solution to the problem is at least two years away. In the meantime, space continues to be a problem. A few examples illustrate the point: City Manager's Office - Space constraints create a variety of problems for the CMO. For example, there is no lobby or waiting area where citizens, job applicants, developers, or others may wait to see the appropriate staff person. Granted, the hallway is an option for waiting, but large crowds often accumulate in the "front" office, making it difficult to move, and confusing to talk with someone. Additionally, I have concerns about the boxes, files and other materials that create an appearance which is far less than professional. File cabinets containing general information are located in your office, which is not always accessible. Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager, has approximately 50 square feet of space! Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary, does not have enough file space to maintain the records. Personnel issues cannot be dealt with in a confidential manner. 1 In short, this office suite: 1) does not allow us to project a professional image to the public, 2) does not allow for comfortable interaction with the public and city personnel, and 3) affects our ability to work in a consistently productive manner due to the noise, crowded conditions, etc. Office Doubles - At last count, ten offices were occupied by two or more staff members. Often these offices are no more than 120-150 square feet, not really providing the room needed for two desks, etc. Three directors share their offices. In Municipal Court, three clerks share the same office, with one sitting in the file closet! And there are a number of desks crammed into the "open space" behind the counter. Again, this creates noise, tension, clutter, and movement difficulties which are not conducive to working productively. In the extreme, the City Engineer shares his office with the GIS Technician -- this office is approximately 150 square feet. Problems in this office are compounded by the fact that the GIS equipment, drafting table, and other furniture/equipment occupy most of the space. In fact, the GIS monitor sits on top of the drafting table, rendering it useless. With engineering and planning, work consists primarily of working with drawings (24" x 36"), which cannot be easily rolled out on the desks due to space constraints, making plan review cumbersome. Meeting Space - Currently there are only two designated meeting rooms. Offices that have conference tables have been filled with staff. It is very difficult to schedule small meetings to deal with day-to-day issues and increasingly difficult to "book" meeting rooms for SPIN groups, committees,etc. While the possibility of using CISD rooms for meetings is an option, it sometimes presents logistical problems and is not a daytime option. Storage - This is always a battle, but in Southlake it is compounded due to space constraints. Boxes are stored under desks, making it difficult to find things, much less move. File space is virtually filled, and yet the Community Development Department continues to work a large number of cases each month, each of which requires file space. There are ways to mitigate this problem (electronically), but in the short term this compounds the space issue. These examples are just a few of the problems we are currently facing with regard to space constraints. There is no way to quantify the frustration of employees and concerns over productivity. How much more could staff members get done if they could work in an area which provides some privacy and few distractions? What short term options are available? In the short term there are two options which seem feasible. The first is to consider leasing existing office space in Southlake. The second is to expand the use of the existing site. Both 2 are discussed below. Leasing Existing Office Space - The idea of leasing office space is rooted in the notion that administrative functions of the organization could be moved with minimal disruption to the "customer." I would submit that the City Manager's Office and Finance (excluding Court and Utility Billing) could move to another location without creating difficulties for citizens and other customers. Yes, there would be some inconveniences, but these would be far outweighed by the issues that would be solved with additional space. Attachment A lists existing office space in Southlake. I worked with Kate Barlow on this list and we intentionally excluded office space in warehouse settings or in areas more suitable for retail. As you can see, we do not have many options. However, the office space offered by Telesupport appears to be a reasonable option, given the constraints. This site offers a comfortable and spacious office setting suitable for our needs. Consider the following: 1) Space analyses show that required space for Administration/Finance for the next two years totals 3,340 square feet. This includes Economic Development. If we included the Chamber of Commerce in the building, this would raise our total to 3,740 square feet needed. If we included a lobby area and a records room/work room, the total is raised to 4,640 square feet. The Telesupport office offers 4,700 square feet of space. 2) Jim Monday has quoted a price of$13.50 per square foot for leasing the space. This amount includes all utilities (except phone service) and janitorial service. Our initial analysis shows that this price is comparable, but a little lower than rates for other (comparable) spaces. Attachment A clearly documents this. This price per square foot results in an annual cost of $63,450 and a monthly cost of approximately $5,287. 3) The location of this property is convenient for municipal offices, given it is just off FM 1709. The property owner is looking to lease this space and, given the lack of office space in Southlake, it is probable that he will. The functions that we are planning to move would be the least intrusive to the neighborhood of all municipal operations. Expanding the Use of the Existing Facility - There are some options for expanding the current facility that should be considered, as listed below: 1) Last year, a single-wide (permanent) trailer was added to the current building at a cost of approximately $70,000. This cost does not include the staff time spent planning for the expansion, and setting up the office space. Additionally, a truck was rented to hold furniture and file cabinets while the set up was underway. Another similar building could be added this year, which would potentially seat 5-6 staff. 2) Another option would be to lease a "temporary" trailer. Public Works staff have received estimates of approximately $600 per month for the lease of a 14 x 60 trailer (the same size as 3 the annex building). This does not include any set up costs. The building placement would be "temporary" since it is a lease arrangement. This means it would be set up in the parking lot, taking spaces. Such a trailer would seat 5-6 staff. 3) Parking is already an issue, and the addition of another trailer would mean that this issue would have to be addressed. The estimated cost of building a parking lot is approximately $15,000, which does not include the cost of the land. Land would have to be leased for this purpose. 4) If another building is added to this site, staff would recommend moving the Building Inspection Division. Although this kind of a move would create inconveniences for our customers, it makes more sense than moving some of the other operations. Again, this is a preliminary review of the issues. I will be happy to answer any questions you or the Council may have regarding space needs or options, or conduct any further research you may deem appropriate. 66(Ar SKY 4 J .. •iifF •'tiff :.:}. :o h.....:. . rn ai, 7cei : y % 4 y a " :4 f A O A A i. : E, a.; AC is i.r a ¢" "° a ¢ h : y O i:: }: /Si: tr .ifA � •UV�.•J `°�'y V'C y = aOqN ° 8 :; 3 Y . , • i 4 A d y r;:: ` oZj x W r , U .z'{, ft c 0ay, o X 10) • Ay Hd 1 • 3 a trli O yp v 3 � U•i. 0 § A yC2bA • c ud 0sN `�� - o fl o I aAU r a Al D ,:, • d o - .' a A ob . .-. 0 1 $ a. Lo •� a <• aka 03 g W LU .' o . aUi o �. w ai { ,'M1'•? 0 _, w a `cd ,N U $ cad bO '•,� c� v; a v,i� y aD.9 >,•? g Jr jJ1r5 U c8i .z •a .r LU O C7W w :•k. �b x v) v) a: ; :• .% • .^ ti.. f ,.tir . ; ' > :::::• .,�ti :1% ..f i .�h LO O� � 1 ',...."41:::::::,:44:•:::::::°.•: :':':E::: 44111) E"( 4)._ .:::i.::::::::.71:0 «: fii��w � :r3 � � oV 4 Z r ir IRO F 1 y a f•; % a p - as µ a %� Z Z g � Z Z Z Z .a .i :L 1 410 c. hi a :E{ t y; y p ce `' i . ^ N -1 .., . .. v G $ a H a . r' • .8°$ . .. p rr oa \ g C ti i• --- :B. ,.... !'...,7.traii •:;;Ail Zi .4.4 8 .1 69 z E9 E°R 69 69 f,R z :e 5 ., EA 3 y zti ,.rs • ;s 'Y ' ^ .V .t• 4-.'d a ; . o dM le.i:,*,-;.,,,-,-....,...-. - , s Ib0'y ».y O _ c,„ ion vy cd y g{,y 7-1 ; �+a :"i; "' ,t...;':i i#• y `.a y R � r -:Sr.,r cad O a cQ '#r'Y"v-i.ii :YZ:;>;>2<i#': y V U > iw ;;: :>;iE. y Q ,� ,.• :::..-Tr p i2fit;:;rP'Ry' :::` O ~ \ w<:iii;i;::; FG F,...`. N V d Fi b y > ^ f.e r 3 0i O TD E y r: t y ww 3 d ai y E ¢ a ,:ri �� O `�' p c 5 $ v) in '- O n f a 1 ' U , A. Fes+, y:, .-, [x G] PI N ener v 0 0 #::.3# co-N l� a .:fir,.,;. :.ri::.:: < �. y Z 0 Ems., .s •..�:::::�;- miiiiii ��ry to. Iyv+,vv4+ ':'L: �•il [[CCiii i4i\ti:: ti 2 H N V) O •S C% < J U � 10 0.= DO ± : ta._ En N Q Z o < :"f':i: r y **§§ titi,5 i2 ::a7•t/�:. 1.. * CA ?*• W '^" #i c . .i IV.%;A. ;`,.Y.4 a0i • .. NI) E'' E t ' 4:‘ O 0 ti'".{>;.: '::•,`g Z Z N , ::v Ili • ... ..„. •wli ;` N ' a+ : 6, '.441 ...: W ��+ O 4.) GQ U r��2#%'s:�x :7. ' r'io LL' p 2' ''`c: : 11-02-95 04:53P1 TO MOBIL LAND P002/002R ...mu—,,,,,vs ir,o2biUS f AP‘/230,12•AS39.1.1. po. kw •lomoutxx• ILL a 1011.1.ILL%1110441.44abl. U)bs I WAN il ----'---z3 P---"":-,,,•:-----=.''''".=:-,..4.-=1"''''. .."--— -^"----,..--7V:-'---.•-•;:x.:•.......,,,;:::-..,,„.•,.. 2(-".......,....,:;..,:-•-• i ' ''-'•:"':::.' ••••'''''•;;;;" .,""".„..,...-.7.:...-^"zr----....7:n.,,.. ••----. ..„..........-— Z 9-5 \''• • :..t-P"17e..-_..... -. ..fr:I. .‘1.-- .,.. ,.,•-•---- . • "2-e— ..., -------•\4 ........„.--- -----,.._—__...-- ....... ..., ..... ...._. _ it 103 ii 74 •:.r:•.....2..._---.......:1,..,;::‘,.....,..•-•-••••.--.., -t?....;....."`"- --- - -..... ..--- , a- ;Ili tIg _-•---- ..•••••:,:,--,. `•,. - i.• 14541GE-gi .-",--_,---...t./.)------ ,4.,,z•.;... i..... ..--..:-..:__,,,._-_, ____.----. --.........,_...„... :Pr1-nc3Ia rigimnni gM-s.,igm-nIo/fiog.Inl ai.4 tg1rl -.-...:-...,..i1-c_--.—...-,-.—.-,-,•.',,,"-—.--._.-.-_--.—..-.,.-...--....,4.._._..5-_-°_6_.7- i.i.-'„-- ...—'-.....-.....-"...-'.......,(---., -.T.-„L-,-,2.,....,-...,.....-."./.„.-.,..-.•.•.'.,.„.,...,,....,.-..—..._...-,.--.—...—.,.. ..._.--....-.._.-..- ,,_-.••.•_-• ,....._.,.....,-.,•.:.:. ..- 7 _ / _-- - _.. I „ -- - / .. . ,., , __ k ../ .--- . - _ .....__— - 7' ---..-.'•-'--••••--'..,1,'--,,'1' 1..Y 4•1!I'. ..... -. -.-........, ,,... --- .7. : _I-'_-::_...st;-N'..... _— 11 3 "WM20'409W 407 .10!- . .7,C 0- 1e?lq . -4 . -- -- 4 / - . ------ - 2:::F- . j 7 o Ii - ---- ./.-----',.° ..,<;-.... i\ '...\ -----llE 1•711 • __,,•' r•••••"--..--... .......,, - - „,.......,......."'"'"•,.. .41°-•. .". ; 1 ie • • f ce S am 11'1 . . _....." Y--)./.....'.- '''.........1 1 : • 71 .. .........._ „../ .." .....•iriM SI s ID I _.__.<*`...• ,'"-.Z. . .... . A1/4 ... 4, ......• ......-- ....---..--...-.:... \ \ -....... i ..___..... .. . ....... .....\......... .... . . / mrizor it, 4 ...* IT-i , — ,s-•-, 1 „....,,,,-1-_-.71,,. ...,...1,:ir_riztz-: - .:::..,-,-:.,:.--.--.,„L".... .., _t-,:-.. _ ..J., ,i, 7 11 M oloz...4, ,., ..... (,, 1 0? i -21r" ,N\.1 IT .•, ''i• ---t----ci„, ; ' i."----',-.----(4.,! g i (..-- _..'..,. • i. ••• , .1/2 i 1 ••••,••••• ! 0: '".7-- -...... 1 h.,..." .i, '1. i ...•‘.0 g i.) ;•••....../ / 1 I 4i.......is.rf."--1--7 oaf, \..•,1 i •„.., i ...i_„.....c.,,..:;) 1 1.1.... , ,. ; , 1 -. 1 4,,,f i • , , • • — •-• .,, , , , ! % , • .• Ics i / ''. ( I • ‘..-.,• i P \ I I I 1 • 1 ;____P-'=•:',.•.- 01-/ 16J------ cr ,,,,,.tes'..,... 1.. -• -.. ,, i ! , i .i.,, { .,..- ..A . ...• . s. ...... ...--4". ..- r .. -•-----.-.1 i 1 il ../..•••• • --.... .. 1 ) ,' 1 ' •". -"" - '••...,,/-- ( •••••- ••‘ • (..i..! .(i 1 .--_ -•--fl *' r +"1 • • j 1 0 --.......--••'. , ,i • • -N .""•-•i ••• t 1 SOW 48'• 11.......P! 80%14' .•••" ...1 i, • .• • . ,i • .... • / : •::" •,•-• ••••• •••-' (,-, •• .,• ? \•:. .i i, i t . ,, ....----\,... .11,th ....._. • • 1 .-t .,/ •A„-; 1 . I f I ; / / 1 ri 44001, ,—.—• " ::•4:7.• rrS1.111__La.f..: i 1 '; I i ' ( i 1•••• .I ' / / / \ ''..., I I k %. / • t 1 i--...:"--f ----•rwsiz.-.zR ‘ 1 I 1 /, 1 i ! /:. '\ i \ 1. ,* / /-- •1,k, 1 %k • 1 I •z ' CO t4\\.. 11 , I • r , i • I • . i \I si .;.. ••• it .1 ', ' :t g./1:i t ''‘ tt / ..• •. I .) e / ...,/ • 1 a 1!3(/* ,i / • / „.‘ , ., . ••• .- -. . , . '..- ( ii 1. ' ,- ,• _ ., . ..-. iv,\...s...4 I 1•,:•.-''..1, S(?, ••.1--•-•• • , ,.• „, I t' --.. 1 , U,' • 'A ' 1 ! I ' i • 0 • li • ' i t 1.:•'•N.*: =Pt 4 \ / I >4 ••• - 1 ; Il til .4 •..';,: •-i.,.. -7‘,--/ , I. • I I i 1 6\ /L./ , %.,...‹•• . -.... .,--_______--------. .--- / I. < ) , ---- ( ,„....-2...:r....".•.. _.- __. .113 -...-.:,:.,-r•._. ._... __,.. .r. ,- ' I / / , ...:-,—„..., .. ---- ,-----i c-....4e., -Rt.•-- :-.'-.1..---r-l'•'1/2"/ -4 • .1 • .. , '. :".,71 i-4 -1••z•-"--.------Si ..,-- ./ 4. •••-i E. ..—.,-,,-- \— ,-. .si ...1 f .... I i . , ..., ,./., , ,, .. ......,,„ . , .. ., , _ . ..) \ ,. .- --t ,,,, „ , 1 . •• / i 4 '' /.,- ,A' '- ••-• -.• - --..,-- I 1 •I % , , • s. \ f I 1 \ ‘ •• . I f: i l ...\''•••• I 1 -e 1.k1L (,,r r.,...„.....-. i ....-- ..., ... ._ i .• i .., ), .N. / \••... , 1. 1 i Is ..- ......,-. / il ....' 4L......11 ...,••• ."-- .....„..... •- \ , . . • s• •• •• , . L...„. ..... )) ) 1 ^. \•' l• -,,fr...... _1 I ..... , ',, \ .•- .. .. so ./. I/ 1 • 1 /. ./......'1 \••• `'el,....,\..s:N. ''''.....:*---- ., ..64,--f- -------- •.... ___1 • ---...\ -.. .... .. . • . „ -... .., 3 c..4 -- . .• * LA -.''•r .r 7164 1 i k 14;,' \ ,........••• 1.1 ,. CliVrlY ' '.• I ..• ..:*".----..---'k ...,__.-................ ..... .... ., . ,, IA i Is 0.4..; ', ''' I \ '-•• N. " N,''''• .."'.- ..-' 40 ----'' - -------•-.. %. ••••' .,NI 4' cr"'ct:10; ''' r.. \k••••.. "...--." •••,•• Ns. '',-..... ..."-- ----.. •••,. -•.. ! ............... •••• . (,-...."..., .) 1 1 1 ••• 1 1/2.„. ..., ,....„..... ..., • \ . . , - • .. • .. cr)(..4 , i -..........._., ---,."----. , '/ '.. ‘. ! .-6:-.q \ .,.......• ., : %... ........ ...•. %..... 635 -----., .., . . ................., -.-...__, • • r 1 ........., ..,... .."‘' • , y, „... • '' ...... ...\''. ......... ..... ......NO'50'09 . 'E 814.4 V ..'\ \\•••., ''',... \_- \ ••••••.. ., ;., 1. i •-; s ' -..„ i 1 • ,, % , • : • 1 \,.....-1—,....... ,,...: %. ' :::• •,: ..f.......;l1, i'f'4.,.: sc ..... „.- ,s., . .-........„,... -- ,.. , .,._. , . -‘,. , •. -..., .. „... , • , .,-,4z_ .... ., - . ,, • , . ----- ) ' -- 4. ( f..... . is ;'• t'\I ,1 .• -.k------ --' . ........:Ls...........- . .. ,... . .. ‘'.. '..... ,.... , 4%Nit. • • •-• ...... , .......__. .... • ••• .. , ..••.• ..... - %.;',,, 1 N'••• ''.. '' ' . ) --•••••;:, , .-..... ,,., i i / 5. •\ \ . •----SQ00,3.E .98.41, •‘,..., ...i i:.*:t,i ..). \ \ ,•-., \......, ,,„ ..--• 1 \,.. ,. .„-,...„.1 , (.4.........._ ..., . 1 , ... s.. ,• ,.\-,....c, ...... ...,... .....,__..... ,• , , f .... ••-, I : , .. .• - • •••%, ,,,!.:•. -...• .... -„ \ .., - --\, „) i --I-v., 1, ... -----:::zz.Lzzz-----.-...._ -,.., ',.. 1 • . 1 .. ...i ..: • *sr"•• 13 Di'', bg.13.itt s....,.........9..,q.:.;€25 •--,._ •.. \ s••,,.. -, ‘\ 1 • , .... ..- ••. .-- 4 2 m IT --- :. , 'et Co 4.110 I •• 4/1• lit • -•'''' --.1 ‘'''...N.,—;80 VI -N.., .....% --. .$) \ .... . `. \ \\• .'''.\ ) 11P = ,,,-/ xc'''' • ... \ :. \ \ , , . .. :• .. ix: \ s. ") sw,.. ry Plc; . 1 j•• ...._.___ • Co IV _... -...•-. .....'"•••••-.. . ,..,.....„....... .,.,, \ ..\ . ---.„_ \ . ) k '''.•••• •. _..._ ... . •-...., • .s•••&.-3 - „....._, .., .. , ,.., \ \ . lc -74.1===..........--.-z•(..--a ,,. .,.. 0 • 1 . • , C. - , , .. .ss, (--)'. --... ..., -.. „..... ..... r. c) , n 21.'.. - <, (-, -..._ .. ,--t - - • \ \ .. C•2• __.....—..-... -- NO -....1. i,-1 111111 C° !----' CO ,•. , . 4/1 . F II T f.: . ,. t w • ,AKE ,0,- , � rs 6 liii ' . . . O QsnPA) CI. , ;%/j/y�iii,//ii i?.. j �_ 1 . J . - ___ j Tlrrwnl Gs. t 1 ' ipt 1 , _ . ),10., ii,w— , „,,,,,,, ik • Dove Street ,< �: -----Jj V . i . �. 0 l,C Clic: ILN r4) 0 . J —r7 —ç: . F (y a u as • id 4 . . !?I . ''' - ia .. &I•M•MM5 T 1 1 1 '/ j .0 1 ri .• /9/Vr•X,"n.tcij, I c7. IM,IC. 11h;»coopecra /'tnt•ie C.w.o ' af4,t4 4ow/ Wert of rw ,t,4. aAfl roXi it,4t47 Too "c•egs us1a t4-7er4fe for Tark kstAicaAwn 15004,d l a$ 11/4/t 5- FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT The parties to this agreement are the City of Southlake, Texas herein called"City", and the Airport Young Men's Christian Association,herein called "YMCA". FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual undertakings herein set out, the parties agree as follows: I. PREMISES City agrees to provide gyms and practice time as defined by Exhibit`B", YMCA Gym Requirements. Gym requirements and dates for the season shall be provided by YMCA to City at least 90 days prior to opening day of the season. Facilities in Exhibit "B" are herein called "Premises" in accordance with the terms of this agreement. II. SEASON AND HOURS The season of this agreement shall be annually on the days of Monday through Saturday, with each facility usage to not begin before 4:00pm on weekdays or 8:00am on Saturdays. Exhibit`B", YMCA Gym Requirements, is approximate dates for significant activities. III. RENEWAL OR TERMINATION This agreement must be renewed on an annual basis on November 1 of each year. with YMCA 11av;1,g tlic uffubt to vuty► ►ntu a IIcw a8,c..,neut. Changes in the agreement must be requested 90 days prior to the renewal date by either party. Written notification by the City must be provided to the City Manager, City of Southlake at City Hall. In the event YMCA terminates this agreement, YMCA will remove its own movable equipment which is not of a permanent nature upon non-renewal of this agreement within thirty(30) days. IV. FEES AND ASSIGNMENT YMCA shall not charge any fees for admission without prior approval of the Parks and Recreation Board for any event. (Example: approved tournaments) YMCA reserves the right to request a voluntary donation for admission to events other than regularly scheduled league games. YMCA agrees to provide signs clearly indicating donations are requested only for the YMCA activity occurring on Premises. Access to other premises activities shall be clearly available. YMCA shall not assign this agreement nor shall it rent out any property of the City without prior written consent of the City. L Rev.Date 11/7/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT I Print Date i 1/7/95 YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM October 24, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Copies of Aesthetic Ordinances from various cities Attached you will find a collection of aesthetic ordinances that we have accumulated from various cities. We had previously forwarded this information to Councilmember Muller and you asked me to prepare copies for the remainder of the Council. Please contact me if you have any additional requests for similar information. q--- GL/gl (17 C:\WPF\MEMO\STAFF\CEH\CEH-AEST.WPD J -TarlCS i itica.cm boew cl ' 1 ch uu/4/t 5-- FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT The parties to this agreement are the City of Southlake, Texas herein called "City", and the Airport Young Men's Christian Association,herein called"YMCA". FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual undertakings herein set out, the parties agree as follows: I. PREMISES City agrees to provide gyms and practice time as defined by Exhibit "B", YMCA Gym Requirements. Gym requirements and dates for the season shall be provided by YMCA to City at least 90 days prior to opening day of the season. Facilities in Exhibit "B" are herein called "Premises" in accordance with the terms of this agreement. II. SEASON AND HOURS The season of this agreement shall be annually on the days of Monday through Saturday, with each facility usage to not begin before 4:00pm on weekdays or 8:00am on Saturdays. Exhibit`B", YMCA Gym Requirements, is approximate dates for significant activities. III. RENEWAL OR TERMINATION This agreement must be renewed on an annual basis on November 1 of each year. with-YMCA having the light &, to a►tL► Tutu a ►► wag,ftnic►►t. Changes in the agreement must be requested 90 days prior to the renewal date by either party. Written notification by the City must be provided to the City Manager, City of Southlake at City Hall. In the event YMCA terminates this agreement, YMCA will remove its own movable equipment which is not of a permanent nature upon non-renewal of this agreement within thirty (30) days. IV. FEES AND ASSIGNMENT YMCA shall not charge any fees for admission without prior approval of the Parks and Recreation Board for any event. (Example: approved tournaments) YMCA reserves the right to request a voluntary donation for admission to events other than regularly scheduled league games. YMCA agrees to provide signs clearly indicating donations are requested only for the YMCA activity occurring on Premises. Access to other premises activities shall be clearly available. YMCA shall not assign this agreement nor shall it rent out any property of the City without prior written consent of the City. L Rev.Date 11/7/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 1 Print Date 11/7/95 YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ( _'1 DARROW McSPEDDEN SELLARS,INC. ARCHITECTS PLANNERS FORT WORTH/SAN ANGELO October 18, 1995 City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas Case No. ZA 95-101 Project Name: Site Plan - G.T.E. Remote Switching Unit Building Addition Lot 1 Block 1 Woodland Hills RSU Owner: G.T.E. Southwest Inc. - Land and Building Division 500 East Carpenter Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: (214) 717-2751 Fax: (214) 717-5854 Architect: Darrow, McSpedden, Sellars Inc. ALA 3115 Loop 306, Suite 100 San Angelo, Texas 76904 Phone: (915) 944-9606 Fax: (915) 944-9472 Dear Sirs; DMS has studied the City's first Site Plan Review Summary and has incorporated these corrections in the attached resubmittals as follows: 31 15 LOOP 308 SUITE 100 SAN ANGELO.TEXAS 78904 915.944.950e 915-944-9472 MAXI MEMBERS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Review Comment #1 The lot and block numbers have been incorporated into the Site Plan title. Review Comment #2 The lot boundary bearings and distances have been corrected to match those of the recorded plat. Review Comment #3 State Hwy 1709 has been changed to F.M. 1709 and West Southlake Boulevard added. Review Comment #4 The following adjacent properties owners have been changed: A. Owners of the property adjacent to the north property line has been changed to: City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas and Bicentennial Park has been added to the label. B. Owners of the property south of F.M. 1709 has been listed as: Lechler Gloria Et. Al. 4116 HC Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76135-9574 000000 White Chapel Blvd S. Grandberry, Hiram Survey Zoned 3C2 and Clardy - Ruffner 425 W. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092-6144 Reutlinger Addition Block 1 Lot 1 Zoned 3C C. The Land Use Designation of adjacent properties has been labeled as instructed. Review Comment #5 Proposed bufferyards; front, rear and sides have been labelled. Proposed planting has been labelled on required Bufferyards schedule, See Review Comment #6 L Review Comment #6 The following Required Bufferyards schedule indicates our proposed Bufferyard widths Lwhich varies from Zoning Ordinance. We are proposing a 15' South Bufferyard, a 15' West Bufferyard and a 10' East Bufferyard. These Bufferyards were provided when the original building was constructed and changing them to the new requirements would place a burden on the owner. Proposed plant requirements will meet or exceed the new requirements. The proposed north bufferyard and planting meets the new requirements. Required Bufferyards Bufferyard Canopy Accent Width - Type Trees Trees Shrubs North - 100' Required 10'-B 2 3 10 Provided 2 3 10 East - 150' Required 5' -A 2 3 12 Provided 10'-A 2 3 10 (20% reduction for width increase) South - 100' Required 20' -O 4 3 14 ,,. Provided 15' -O 4 6 17 ,i West - 154' Required 5' -A 2 3 12 Provided 15' -A 2 7 12 Review Comment #7 The following required interior landscape schedule labels the required landscape and resulting required planting. The required areas was calculated using the Total Bldg. Area; 992.72 Sq. Ft. (See Site Data Summary Schedule -review comment#8) times 30% equals 297.82 Sq. Ft. Required Interior Landscape Canopy Accent Ground i Trees Trees Shrubs Cover Area Req'd = 297.82 Sq. Ft. 1 1 6 33.07 Sq. Ft. Provided 1 1 16 75 Sq. Ft. L Review Comment #8 L. The following is the Site Data Summary requested: Site Data Summary Existing Zoning "CS" Proposed Zoning "CS" Land Use Designation "Public/Semi-Public" Gross Acreage 0.35 Ac. Net Acreage 0.35 Ac. Start Construction Nov/1995 Finish Construction Feb/1996 Existing Bldg. Area 496.36 Sq. Ft. Proposed Bldg. Area 496.36 Sq. Ft. Use Electronic Telephone Equipment Building Total Bldg Area 992.72 Sq. Ft. Number of Stories One (1) Existing Floor Area 445.42 Sq. Ft. Use Electronic Telephone Equipment Proposed Floor Area 461.62 Sq. Ft. Use Electronic Telephone Equipment Total Floor Area 877.04 Sq. Ft. Percentage of Site Coverage 6.5% Area of open space 14,228.23 Sq. Ft. Open space as a percentage 93.5% Outside storage percentage 0 Required Parking 2 Provided Parking 2 Spaces Standard 2 Handicapped 0 Review Comment #9 (was left out) Review Comment #10 Planting screen along the drive in the South Bufferyard has been labelled on graphic. Review Comment #11 Planting screen between air conditioner condensers enclosure and Medium Density Residential Land use property adjoining the north boundary line has been labelled. Review Comment #12 All drives, parking spaces, walks and air conditioner equipment enclosures have been labelled on graphic. L • • Review Comment #13 This facility does not generate a lot of trash, therefore does not have a dumpster. What trash is generated is carried by owners employees to a centralized location. Review Comment #14 The Corridor Overlay Zone 40' read building set back line requirement has been labelled on the graphic. The attached informational comments have been noted and Owner/Architect/Contractor will comply with them. "Case NO. 2A 95-101" has been placed in the lower right hand border of the graphics. We hope we have successfully complied with all requirements and thank you and your staff for the assistance. Thank you. Sincerely; Gene C. Sellars L Y H2NO GROUP Position on the Proposed Expansion of the Pearson Lane Pump Station and Above-ground Water Storage Facility The H2NO Group, made up of property owners in the Pearson's Crossing subdivision and the surrounding area, protests against the expansion of the Pearson Lane above-ground water storage facility and pump station in the City of Keller. The proposed expansion is by the City of Southlake. The current facility has a 3 million gallon capacity. The proposed expansion includes the addition of an 8 million gallon above-ground storage tank and an additional 5 million gallon above-ground storage tank thereby raising the total facility capacity to 16 million gallons. This above-ground storage facility is on the doorstep of the homeowners in the Pearson's Crossing subdivision as well as those homeowners on the other side of Pearson Lane. There is also an elementary school located nearby. Article I, Section 17 of the Texas Constitution provides that no person's property shall be taken, damaged or destroyed for or applied to public use without adequate compensation being made, unless by the consent of such person. Local property values will be significantly reduced by the expansion of the Pearson Lane facility, thereby causing damage. Within the meaning of Article I, Section 17, damage to property can be any injurious effect to property, without any appropriation or intrusion upon the land itself. Texas courts have also held that claims under Article I, Section 17 for injury to land abutting a project causing injury or so situated with reference to such project that the land suffers injury are entitled to compensation for damage. Also, the estimation of the diminution in value of the abutting property damaged by the project does not depend only on causes actually operating at the time; causes of damage that may reasonably be expected in the future may also be considered. II. Considerations and positions of H2NO group property owners with regard to the expansion of the Pearson Lane facility. 1. Local property values will be significantly reduced by the expansion of the Pearson Lane facility. The presence of the existing tank has caused difficulties in the sale of houses in the area. (One local house had approximately 2-1/2 showings per week over a 12-month period and did not sell even at a reduced price. The chief reason given was the proximity of the above-ground water tank.) The expansion of the Pearson Lane facility would adversely affect all property values in the surrounding area. Estimates of the potential reduction in property values range from 20% to 50% according to conversations with several local realtors. This will harm not only the local property owners but also the City of Southlake, the City of Keller, the Keller Independent School District, and the Carroll Independent School District by reducing their tax revenue. This is particularly lamentable in light of the fact that alternative sites exist that will not affect any residential area in Keller or Southlake. These include a facility within the Southlake city limits with an already existing water tower and another possible site which is zoned for commercial use. 2. Computer malfunctions have previously caused the dump valves of the existing 3 million gallon tank to open without warning. This unexpected release of large amounts of water has flooded adjacent vacant lots in the Pearson's Crossing subdivision, as well as the yards of some of the existing homes nearby. A home is currently being constructed on one of the previously flooded lots. Fortunately, these incidents have thus far not caused any serious damage to the surrounding homes or any injury to the surrounding residents. However, with the tripling of the facility's capacity, the risk of flooding will be substantially increased. The drainage ditch in the area has thus far been insufficient to handle the water released by these unexpected dump valve openings from the one 3 million gallon tank. This drainage ditch flows right through the Pearson's Crossing subdivision. 3. A 16 million gallon above-ground water storage facility will require storage on the site of substantial quantities of chlorine, thereby posing a serious health risk to the surrounding neighborhood and the nearby elementary school. 4. There are no early warning devices or flood containment measures in place on the existing facility. If the expansion occurs, some kind of early warning device should be installed, and a flood containment dike or wall should be constructed around the facility. 5. In addition to the concerns mentioned above, the expansion of the Pearson Lane facility will exacerbate the nuisances associated with the current facility in the following particulars: a. Noise: the automated shutdown/restart systems on the existing facility are extremely loud; loud enough to be heard indoors during an electrical storm. The noise generated by a facility three times the size of the current one would be substantially greater, and would consequently affect a much larger area. b. Vandalism: water towers have always been a prime target for vandals. A facility of the proposed size would be irresistible for vandals, thereby inevitably increasing the incidence of vandalism in the surrounding neighborhoods. c. Lightning: the lightning associated with a facility of this size poses a potentially very dangerous nuisance to the adjacent homeowners. 7suIf L ROYAL PROPERTIES 11300 N. Central Expressway Suite +I01 Dallas, Texas 75243 (214) 696-5270 November 7, 1995 Mr. Greg Last Community Development Director City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Case No.: ZA 95-104 Project Name: Southlake Center at Kimball; 1.91E Acres, Thomas East Survey, Abst. #474 Dear Mr. Last: As regards the above referenced site plan, the City of Southlake has expressed concerns regarding a proposed left turn off of Westbound S.H. 1709, into the driveway of the subject property. In response to the City's concerns, Royal Properties retained DeShaza, Tang & Associates, Inc. to study what, if any, adverse impact this proposed left turn would have on traffic operations. (A copy of this study, minus the appendix, is enclosed). From this study, it appears that left turn access into the Burger King driveway would not create any problems to traffic operations. When we acquired this site in July, 1994, the then existing ordinances would easily have accommodated our needs for access to this site. Burger King is demanding this left turn access, as most users will. It would seem to be good business for the city of Southlake to accommodate quality users in commercial areas, especially when no adverse impact is created to the City or its traffic operations. Best Regards, ROYAL PROPERTIES 0-8°V,„'-‘44-%- George Allen Enclosure cc: Dennis Klllough Gary Fickes Tony Trammell This fax contains 7 pages. Please call Jana @ 214-696-5270 if you do not receive all 7 pages or cannot read them. t+ NOV 0? '95 13:50 DESHA O TANa R ASSOC'TAT5=S P.2 h, DeShane,Tang&Assodates,lac. Erigi■e re • Plenum 400 Soma Houston,Suite 330 - paw.Tcra 7$20241103 214f748-0740 4 Metro 214/269-5421 FAX 214/74*-7037 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • To: Mr.George Allen Royal Properties Tenn: DeSbaxo,Tang&Assodatcs,Inc. Date November 6, 1995 Re Site Access Study for Burger King Restaurant in Southlake 195116 PURPOSE • The purpose of this memorandum is to determine the impact of a proposed driveway for a Burger King Restaurant on traffic operations at the adjacent intersection of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Kimball Road in Southiake,Texas. Specifically, en analysis is performed to determine whether traffic turning left into the site from westbound Southiake Boulevard would adversely impact traffic operations at the signalized intersection. Traffic movements projected to be generated by development of the site are superimposed upon background traffic and analyzed to predict vehicle delay and maximum length of queue at the left-turn lane from westbound Southlake Boulevard onto sontbbound Kimball Road. INTRODUCTION The subject site for this study consists of approaatoately 1.9 acres, located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of$pnthiake Boulevard and Kimball Road. Royal Properties ban proposed to develop a Burger King restaurant plea 6,350 square feet of general retail development at this location. Exhibit 1 illustrates the proposed site plan. A description of the adjacent roadway facilities is given below. • Sou Make Boulevard(FM 1709): currently a live lane section with a continuous left-turn lane adjacent to the sits. At the intersection with Kimball Road,Southlake Boulevard operates with exclusive left-turn lanes and free-eight tern lanes. Southlake Boulevard provides access to SH-114 to the east and serves as a major arterial providing east-west access to development in Soutblekc end surrounding communities. • Kimball Road: currently a two-lane, undivided roadway south of Southlake Boulevard,Kimball Road provides north-south access to commercial and residential development. Recently a new roadway alignment has established a connection between north and south Kimball Road,providing access to sit. 114_ Scheduled improvements to Kimball include widening to a four-lane undivided roadway south of Southlake Boulevard, and a four-lane divided roadway north of Southiake Boulevard. Connections between South Kimball Road, Continental Boulevard and SH-26 are also planned. When these improvements are completed,Kimball Road is expected to provide a major access route to SH-114 for the southeast portion of the City. L 1.1()V 07 •95 13751 S-r o TANG & ASSOCIRTES P.3 L ,,,,.. r,N)- SO �. • 1304/461, 1 OLP • wimae111p i71 -`" ^�,`.:'^ • ,reo i. N. ithm.9 : .1 tvg,K-514gti.,.. ."-- :-.1,,nr .!.."..:..0•---f.- ..! 1" ` '��i,•q. RagrAupwr ! +` Z ' {._ rr�weixrt ..�:. +:cpawre pAyr i_.j ... :....-!i.r!1.•!:-eL:1-4 i.,A,.i-.i'.:tA,..•:1''i 117 1 __: 1 ,/1 ((((. ?,OpQ 8F I 'T� ', 14 ? it.A:' " - •• 1 ,_ • .l i. �, ji ., , w ... .._.�t a iif ..�, "``I Rawl ' • - :./ • %► EXHIBIT 1 v SITE PLAN L z NOV 07 'S5 13 o S2 DESHRZO TANG 8 AsSr3c t:ATEs, LUSTING Tun IC P.4 (kw In wet unfits to edict the impact of future. moMetlttat8 s4 thedew/optima, itwas first necessary to obtain data on existing traffic UeShas�TiOg and ��°f the�dy site. Therefore, on the evening of November 3. 1995, So: lake)Boulevard and Kimball Road. In addition, City recd of Soutblake PlanningDepartment.ual intersection traffic to mat recent available 24-hour traffic volume counts for Kimball Road. Copies of these data are the Appendix. provided is the PROJECTED TRyC In order to project Mere traffic volumes in the vkia of the generated by the proposed land uses most first be estimated. Theproposed development,n destinationshe number theof trips Enaerated trips must be projected and the traffic thus probable origins andy network serving she �. The roadways are then analyzed with,red without t�r�Aibated to the►order at the i pact the proposed development on traffic operation in the vicinitym site-generated deterd detertraffimined. in order that the impact of the may bc detessnituad. Trip Generation A fund/metal step in t�impact A f nd*me for he the ratio process for a site it projecting the site-generated trips. The source 5th the tripo this study ere obtained frost,the Institute of Transportation ra' )5sou Copies of the date mad tho number of trip�s aerated by a Fast Food Restaurant►v1Rugg th}Drite.7broam this 0tud]►far determining Shopping 05.350 SF) are provided in the Appendix. Btdtibit 2 aumm results lts of he'd and byn Retailn analysis fee the proposed development of the s a:> s the resgits of the trip generation eject site. EXHIBIT Z TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY imemoimmemmnsw---- ______ _ tire TOTAL AM PEAK PM PEAK USE AMOUNT DAILY TRAFFIC HOUR TRAFFIC HOUR TRIP ~. ENDS IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Restataaat(fastfopd with s d -- � � • �) 3,000 SF 1.900 85 82 167 51 53 110 General Retail -~"'--- r _ _AMY 6'3SO$p l 12 32 57 S') 114 TOTAL TRIPS 3,162 103 94 199 114 110 224 40% Passby for Fast-Food 760 34 33 67 —.. _ _ 4 Z1 id TOTAL nips ADDED I.. TO ADIACENT S'IRi TS ?1 61 132 91 89 , ISO Arm -- r .r As noted in tbrhibit 2, the development is projected to generate approximately 3,162 trip ends per 24-hour day pied. Of these 3,162 daily trips,760 are currently on the adjacent roadways,and 2,402 trips are new /tips added to the sdiacent streets. ThasG site-geaYera#ed trips were then distributed to the adjacent strectS batted on the orientations of the existing and proposed trefiic volruaca. 3 NOV 07 '95 13:52 DESHRZ0 TANG & ASSOCIATE5 F_S ANALYSIS/OBSERVATIONS Intr Using the Highway Capacity Software,the intorscctiin of SouthlaIce Boulevard and Kimball Road was to determine the impact of the development on the intersection operations daring the PM peak hoar. The fntemectioe is expected to operate at the following levels of service under the various scenarios: Existing. Level of Service B/15.0 Seconds delay per vehicle Existing with development- Level of Service C/15.6 Seconds delay per vehicle Year 1998- Level of Service D/35.8 Seconds d Year 1998 with of Service D/36.5Seconds delay w per vehicle development. Level per vehicle A queue analysi was also performed oa the westbound left turn lure on Southlake Boulevard. Based on a 99% probability.the following queue distances can be anticipated during the treeing peak hourr Existing- 1 vehicles/73 feet f lqg with development- 2 vehicles/23 feet Year 1998- 2 vehlcles/46 feet Year 1998 with development- 2 vehicles/96 feet The proposed driveway on Southlake Boulevard is approximately 160 feet from the intersection of Southlake Boulevard and Kimball Road. Therefore,the vehicles turning left into the Barger Icing driveway front westbound Son Make Boulevard are not expected to affect the operation of the Southlake Bonlevard/Kintbe8 Road intonation under existing traffic conditions or in the future when Kimball Road is extended to SR 26, A queue analysis was also performed for the vehicles turning left from Soathlake Boulevard into the Berger King driveway.The analysis indicates the queue will be the following eta 99%probability: Existing with development- 1 vehicles/46 feet Year 1998 with development- 2 vehicles/46 feet CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed development, located in the southeast quadrant of Southlake Boulevard and Kimball Road, is proposed to consist of a Barger King and a 6,350 square foot retail use.The site is expected to add 180 trips to the adjacent roadway network during the PM peak hour. This represents•6 percent increase in traffic volumes at the intersection of Southlake Boulevard and Kimball Road. A driveway into the pied development is plumed to be located approximately 160 feet from the intersection of Southlake Boulevard and Kimball Road. The westbound left turn movement at( ball Road is expected to queue apprax imutcly 16 feet from the intersection. Wherefore,the proposed driveway is not expected to affect the traffic operatlous of the intersection of Southlake Boulevard and Kimball Road. The proposed driveway is anticipated to have 2 or less vehicles in the queute turning left into the site from Southlake Boulevard 99%of the time during the evening peak hour. No le&turns will be permitted frees the driveway onto Southlake Boulevard. Because of the low left tent queue expected at this driveway,the driveway traffic should have little or no Impact or the operation of the intersection of Southlake Boulevard and Kimball Road. L4 NOV 07 '95 15:53 tESHA20 TANG Si ASSbi_ZRTCS P_6 p. SOUTHLA KEOFr Y) D B m � r �SOULEVARD 76✓ Sri fizz ,r- 13 CO :j. IR) 1 11, . EXisrI A16- TRAFFI<. r . Paq if- f}p)r . fat Ei Arh °' UTHLAKE D 1 n BOULEVARD trr _ M 'a . . co nar (lir 71.1 lit ) ( , SC F:UrU2e_ T2AFFt C.. P. M, PMAir NaarZ ilt in a NO SOUTHLAKE ` '` D J . BOULEVARD (, Cr \.. .111h :.:Jjt 11) ,, lor 1 ,(11Pr 03 (rise c 11-E- 6-V+ERAT60 TnAPF1 L F,M. PAriltr 1400#7, •• NOV 07 '95 13:54 DESNAZO TANG R A✓SOCIATES P_7 j ,-..J i rr fuf •",,, .S.,. fi2 • 2.8 aCkt t - . J, 4 . eSTALJRANT.3TE , - _ - . Z, 4 `.. L IC g, . ...mg.:. _ 1 .� -ewcq+��� ` aR > � ; - wWww' PETAL SITE; I ).,, . FIEriii"Wf I' is • x . - t p7A�? 7 a. . - - . 15 — x 'mot' • +' ...' • am. /—i • '�'y M t � nsrm....,yr ri,��� 1gsr•• RMMMM•• ---_-- fp s L,va.gay Fmk Ix«�� • •� • • 'r SITE YRArrIC City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting November 7, 1995. 1. Note the Consent Agenda has a larger than usual number of items. We are attempting to gain you some time by placing those items on the routine Consent Agenda which are not expected to generate much discussion or debate. If after work session you want to add any item to the Consent Agenda, simply have the Mayor announce this during the Mayor's report. We apologize for the lengthy agenda, but the number (and complexity) of recent development issues have precluded us from bringing these items forward. This agenda is indicative of the number of issues we are working on and need to bring forward for you to address. 2. Agenda Item No. 5A. Award of contract with Cheatham and Associates for the Year 2 Neighborhood Sewer Program. As noted in the memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, proceeding at this time with the design of the neighborhood sewers for the Year 2 subdivisions will put us on a schedule to have the plans approved and ready for bids at the beginning of the next fiscal year. Note that the design for the water system improvements in the Shady Lane vicinity is also included. FYI, regarding the Year 1 Neighborhood Sewer Program, bids for the Vista Trails subdivision (including street improvements) will be opened November 9 and be on your agenda November 21. Construction should begin about the first week of December. We are still in the process of acquiring easements in the Whispering Dell and Highland Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Page 2 neighborhoods. We hope to bid these two along with Emerald Estates in December. Meanwhile, some residents in Emerald (along the existing Lonesome Dove Estates sewer), have already connected. 3. Agenda Item No. 5B. Contract for services with Dunaway and Associates for Road Bond Projects. Note in the memo from Ron Harper, City Engineer, that Dunaway has an excellent performance record with the City. 4. Agenda Item No. 5C. Resolution No. 95-48. abandonment of a twenty foot sanitary sewer easement and acceptance of a new sanitary sewer easement for Timarron Addition. Golf Villas A &B. This change will be within the Timarron Golf Villas at no expense to the Lie City. Staff recommends this be approved. 5. Agenda Item No. 5D. Resolution No. 95-49. Southlake's vote on the Tarrant Appraisal District Board of Directors. As Sandy's memo points out, a vote for Mac Wilburn will give NE Tarrant County a voice. 6. Agenda Item No. 5E. Interlocal Agreement between the City of Southlake and the City of Plano for Plan Review. As we discussed early in the budget process, we believe that the use of the Interlocal Agreement is the best way for Southlake to receive assistance in the commercial plan review. This service is preferable to hiring additional part-time staff to assist our plan reviewer, Chuck Bloomberg. FYI, Bob Whitehead and I worked with Plano's Chief Building Official while in Abilene and we have every confidence in the ability of his staff. As noted in the memo from Bob Whitehead, Plano is the only area city that provides this service. L Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Li Page 3 We utilized the Plano plan review staff for a second opinion on one of our difficult reviews, the Stacy Warehouse Addition. This is discussed in some detail in Item No. 20 below. 7. Agenda Item No. 5F. Authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement for Fire Protection Services with Denton County. Note in the memo from Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety, that this is an agreement that has been in place for a number of years and is "reviewed" annually. More than anything else, it is an opportunity for us to work with Denton County without any burden to our community. 8. Agenda Item No. 5G. Authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement for Ambulance Service with Denton County. This item provides the EMS service in the same manner as the fire service set out in the above item. Note that for both Items No. 5F and 5G there are no exhibits A as indicated in the contract. We hope to provide this map Tuesday evening. 9. Agenda Item No. 5H. Authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Grapevine for Mutual Aid. This contract is one of the mutual aid agreements we have with surrounding cities that benefit both parties. Through the use of these type of agreements, we are able to provide a higher level of service than would otherwise be possible without hiring additional personnel. 10. Agenda Item No. 5I. Authorizing the Mayor to execute a Southlake Youth Basketball Association Facilities Utilization Agreement. and Agenda Item No. 5J. Authorizing the Mayor to execute a Y.M.C.A. Basketball Association Facilities Utilization Agreement. As noted in the memos from Kim McAdams, Director of Parks and Recreation, these agreements are required (by the City's Park Use Policy) for "formal organizations and Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Page 4 leagues who sponsor and control organized continuing athletic activities on a seasonal basis." These agreements formalize the details of the City's interaction with these groups and liability requirements. You will recall that we entered into similar agreements with the Southlake Baseball, Softball and Soccer Associations last year. 11. Agenda Item No. 7A. 2nd Reading. Ordinance No. 480-183. ZA 95-88. Rezoning for 3.38 acres, located on the west side of the private street. Marantha Way. Recall that the second reading for this zoning request was scheduled for the first meeting in November due to the fact that we could not get out the notice for the public hearing and meet the 10-day requirement set out in Section 3.13 of the City Charter: Cie The City Secretary shall publish...at least ten (10) days before the second reading. There are no changes in this item since City Council approval of the first reading 7-0 on October 10 (the continuation of the October 3rd meeting). Note the staff comment in the memo from Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator, concerning the plat. 12. Agenda Item No. 7B. 2nd Reading. Ord. No. 480-185. ZA 95-98. Rezoning for 9.857 acres. 1835 N. Peytonville Ave.. current zoning is AG. requested zoning is SF-1A. There have been no changes since City Council approval of the first reading 6-0. 13. Agenda Item No. 7C. Plat Showing. ZA 95-99. Lots 2 and 3 of the T. Beedy No. 72 Addition. 9.857 acres. 1835 N. Peytonville Ave. The lot configuration proposed by this plat is unique in that the applicants are trying to maintain a lot for the existing house and create another lot in order to build another residence. The only significant issue is that staff wants to ensure that the proposed lot line does not create a side yard building line encroachment by the existing house. Comment number four on the staff review summary Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 L., Page 5 recommends that a survey of the home and the proposed lot line be provided in order to confirm there is not an encroachment. They have provided "sketches" previously but the information conflicts with plat information. This should not be a big problem to the applicant and in the long run it should help them sell either property since there would not be an encroachment to worry about. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. Note in the memos from staff that Lot 3 does not meet the intent of the 100' minimum lot width requirement. This is not the first time this issue has come up, nor is it likely to be the last. 14. Agenda Item No. 7D and 7E. Public Hearing on Land Use Assumptions and Resolution No. 95-45, adopting Land Use Assumption for possible Impact Fees. The memo from Tom Elgin, Planner,succinctly describes how the Land Use Assumptions fit into the bigger picture of adoption of water, wastewater and roadway impact fees. Although the planning consultant, J.T. Dunkin and Associates, prepared the Land Use Assumptions, Tom will be making the presentation to City Council. He has worked very closely with the consultant and will be able to answer any questions that might arise. Feel free to call Tom at extension 753 if you have any questions prior to the meeting. Note in the memo from Tom that the Public Hearing (Agenda Item No. 7D) requires no action by City Council other than opening the Public Hearing and closing the Public Hearing following public input. The adoption of the Land Use Assumptions is a prerequisite to the adoption of impact fees. Li 15. Agenda Item No. 8A. ZA 95-101, Site Plan for Remote Switching Unit (R.S.U.) Building Addition, for GTE Southwest Inc.. north side of W. Southlake Blvd. approximately 1300' Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Page 6 west of White Chapel Blvd. There are no significant issues with this request. The applicant, GTE,needs to expand the existing building. Although there are a few comments on the review summary,it is our understanding that the only variance the applicant needs is to address the fact that the existing parking lot is currently within the 20' bufferyard as required by the Corridor Study. Greg Last attended most, if not every meeting, of the Corridor Study. He does not recall that it was ever the intent of the Corridor Study to require removal of paved areas in order to accommodate the new bufferyard. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0, allowing the paving in the bufferyard. 16. Agenda Item No. 8B. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 480-186. ZA 95-103. Rezoning for 0.112 acres. from AG to C-3. Although we technically call this a"rezoning,"this property was never zoned because it was public right-of-way. The property to be rezoned is the ROW for Kimball Avenue which the City recently abandoned. The remaining adjacent property is currently zoned"C-3." There are no significant issues with the rezoning portion of this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. 17. Agenda Item No. 8C. ZA 95-104. Site Plan for the Southlake Center at Kimball. 1.9801 acres. There are basically two issues with the site plan portion of the request: driveways and building articulation. The applicant is requesting a driveway on FM 1709 which does not meet the requirements of the driveway ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the driveway be limited to right-in and right-out only. The applicants would be willing to accept a right-in/right-out configuration, but modified to allow traffic westbound on FM 1709 to turn left into the site. The other issue is building articulation. P/Z recommended waiving the articulation requirements on the restaurant building on the west lot,but required the articulation on the retail building on the east lot. Our understanding is that the applicant would like all articulation waived where required. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Page 7 18. Agenda Item No. 8D. ZA 95-92. Development Plan for Solana. Phase 1. 54.99 acres. This is the first phase of their proposed residential portion of the PUD as recently approved. Greg Last had mentioned a recommendation to provide a pedestrian access from this phase to the future trail on White Chapel Boulevard. That recommendation is not on this review summary. During the discussion it was brought out that the connection would probably be better located in a future phase of the project, located more closely to the Corps of Engineer land. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-1-1. There is a related item which must be considered. MTP is showing open space dedication. They will be appearing before the Park and Recreation Board next Monday, November 6, (ble to discuss park dedication requirements. MTP does not care which will be required, land dedication or fees in lieu of dedication, but will not want to do both. The City's ordinances have provisions that set out when and why consideration can be given to, and credits be allowed, for the use of tree belts, flood plains and creeks, etc., to satisfy the open space and park land requirements. Councilmember Hall, who along with Councilmembers Muller and Evans and Mayor Fickes were on the Council when the PUD and Park Dedication ordinances were passed, reminded me and I thought I would share her comments as best as I can paraphrase them. By ordinance, one of the factors which the PUD district may be designed to accommodate is "...preservation or enhancement of areas exhibiting environmentally significant natural features." (Zoning Ord #480, Section 30.3e.) As Councilmember Hall succinctly reminded me, we do not have any historical preservation areas, or cultural heritage areas. What we have to preserve is natural wooded open space, in the tree belts and along the creeks. That is what we are trying to preserve. A developer can legally reclaim the flood Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 L.", Page 8 plain, and remove trees where necessary to build in many situations. That is why "credit" has been given along Bear Creek for example, and around other lesser creeks. According to the Park Dedication Requirements sections of the Subdivision Ordinance (No. 483), we have set out to "...ensure that in new residential developments...there will be sufficient land dedicated or otherwise set aside to meet the demand and need of the future residents of the development for open space (emphasis added) and neighborhood parks, containing passive (emphasis added) or active recreational areas...." (Section 7.01A) Additionally, the ordinance recognizes the need to give exceptions to compliance with the terms and conditions of the ordinance: In any development which includes wooded areas, flood plains, or other natural features which are desirable to maintain, the City Council may grant an exception from the strict application of these minimum [width and depth] dimensions whenever it determines that by doing so the protection and preservation of such areas will be promoted. (Section 7.02 C.7) Also, in considering the character of dedicated land, the ordinance recognizes the uniqueness of our "national heritage" in that: Natural areas or flood plains which provide unique opportunities may be included in areas dedicated or otherwise set aside or reserved for open space. In considering any area for dedication which does not meet the standards of this ordinance and where the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Le Page 9 ordinance allows the municipality to employ its discretion, the following may be considered: 1. Preservation area of unique natural beauty, area possessing unique natural features, or other ecologically valuable areas. (Section 7.04 B) Consider the following as the ordinances discussed above relate to Solana's R-PUD and NR-PUD and the issue of open space and park land dedication. R-PUD Total acres: 199.2 acres; maximum number of residential units allowed(based on 2.18 du/gross acre): 434 units; required open space: 19.9 acres; proposed open space: 21.1 acres (including approximately 14 acres along North White Chapel Boulevard and the northern border of the property to be used for the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan as an avenue for its Master Trail System). If this land is not accepted for the trail extension, fourteen or more individual owners would have to be approached regarding dedication of an access easement across the front of their property rather than a single owner (MTP-IBM Joint Venture) at this time. NR-PUD Total acres: 127.9 acres;No ancillary residential use proposed; therefore,no open space required. They have committed to preserving.approximately 40.0 acres of land in its natural state in the northern portion of this development; no development is proposed in this area. Perhaps KSB or some others in our community may be helpful in establishing the value of the virgin forest land being preserved. The value of the open space and park land being dedicated far exceeds what would be received by the City if fees in lieu of the proposed park land were required. Although it may seem on one hand that the narrow strips for trails are insignificant, if it is important to meet Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Page 10 the concepts of the Trail Master Plan and connect the West Beach area park and Bicentennial Park through a linear park (trail), City Council may wish to exercise the options and exceptions noted above in order to achieve a greater objective for the community than can be derived in this instance through park fees in lieu of park and open space dedication. In short,the proposed dedication is in keeping with current ordinances. The City Council will need to decide if this dedication meets the City's current and future needs. 19. Agenda Item No. 8E. ZA 95-93. Preliminary Plat for Solana. Phase I. There are no significant issues related to the preliminary plat. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0-1. (410e 20. Agenda Item No. 8F. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 480- 7 - g g 18 . ZA 95 77. Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse. As you are probably aware, the Stacy Warehouse property is zoned "I-1 which does not permit retail uses. Mr. Stacy needs to expand his business and make some internal changes to his layout. In order for staff to issue a building permit, a rezoning had to be requested which would allow his use. Due to the uniqueness of his business, the "S-P-1" zoning seemed to be the most appropriate. There are a few issues to be addressed with this proposal as noted in the memo from Karen Gandy under "staff comments." The most significant of these is the parking requirements. Mr. Stacy has made several modifications during the P/Z review in order to mitigate the concerns but he is unable to physically provide more parking and meet his building needs. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of his proposal 7-0, waiving the ordinance requirements noted in the review letter. As mentioned earlier, there will be situations that are unrelated to the zoning which Mr. Stacy must address before he can proceed with the building construction. These deal with the existing building,his proposed additions,the code in effect at the time he constructed his Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Le. Page 11 building, and the current code. We are trying to work with Mr. Stacy,but there are still life- safety issues unresolved. Attached are two memos from staff concerning the Stacy Furniture additions. These are intended only to keep you informed as to the problems we are attempting to resolve since, as mentioned above, the problems are unrelated to the zoning. 21. Agenda Item No. 8G. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 483-D. amending the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. This amendment to the subdivision ordinance contains basically clean- up items. There are two presentations of the proposed ordinance, one in redline/strikeout format so you can see the changes in context, and another clean version. Feel free to contact Greg Last (ext 750) or Tom Elgin (ext 753) if you have any questions. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. 22. Agenda Item No. 8H. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 483-E. amending the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. regarding private streets. You previously directed staff to prepare regulations related to private street developments. This ordinance establishes those regulations as well as procedures for approval. This will at least give you criteria to evaluate future requests. Feel free to contact me, Greg Last or Tom Elgin if you have any questions. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. 23. Agenda Item No. 8I. 1st Reading. Ordinance No. 652. abandonment of an easement on the MTP-IBM property. The attached memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, clearly describes the issues involved. Staff has determined that this easement is not being used,nor useful or convenient to the public in general. L Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 LPage 12 24. Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution No. 95-42. appointment to Park and Recreation Board. We have had two individuals apply for the open position, as delineated in the memo from Sandy LeGrand. 25. Agenda Item No. 10A. Amended Developer Agreement for Oakwood Pond. As noted in the materials provided by Bob Whitehead, this amendment rewords the section of the agreement discussing the perimeter street ordinance, to grant credit for construction of a drain pipe to alleviate flooding conditions. You will recall that Council directed staff to amend the agreement at its October 17 meeting. 26. Agenda Item No. 10B. Request for bids for alignment to two intersections: White Chapel (limr Blvd. at Dove Road and Carroll Avenue at Dove Road. As you are well aware, in our discussions regarding the reconstruction of Dove Road we analyzed the possibility of realigning the intersection at Dove and Carroll. Staff instructed the engineer to design the intersection to meet specifications Council articulated to us. Your packet includes a memo from Ron Harper, City Engineer, and the realignment presented by the engineer, Rady & Associates. Note the estimated cost of$140,000. In order to construct the road with the new alignment, the City will need to acquire land. Staff needs Council direction on this issue so that we may proceed with bids for the reconstruction of Dove Road. Additionally, staff needs direction regarding the intersection at Dove Road and White Chapel. You will recall that Council reviewed the potential realignment for this intersection several months ago and decided not to pursue it at the time, primarily due to the cost and the number of trees involved. We are bringing this back to you to give you the opportunity to finalize the realignment for this intersection so that we can take advantage of ROW dedication from Maguire Thomas Partners. Please see Ron's memo for more details. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Page 13 27. Agenda Item No. 10C. Contract for Engineering Services for the Booster Pump site and Ground Storage site on the North side of town. As you know, we are working to tie down a site for the booster pump station and ground storage tank on the north side of town, in the general vicinity of T.W. King and S.H. 114. Although a specific site has not yet been finalized, staff would like to move forward with construction plan and document preparation. Your packet contains a proposal from Cheatham and Associates to provide this service, which would include surveying, engineering, design, and any easement preparation. By moving forward with this preliminary design work, we will be able to more quickly move to the final design phase once the site is selected. 28. Agenda Item No. 10D. Revised Investment Policy. The Texas Legislature passed HB (re 2459 during the last legislative session in an attempt to "tighten" requirements and address investment issues through the Public Funds Investment Act. Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, has modified our investment policy to reflect the new requirements. You will note that the changes to our policy are primarily administrative. The new requirements will not affect our investment strategy. We placed this item under here so that you could discuss it with staff during the meeting, if that is your wish. However, if you feel comfortable that the changes are ministerial you may want to move this item to the Consent Agenda. 29. Agenda Item No. 11A. Discussion of a Lease Purchase for Radar Smart Trailer. On occasion, the City is approached by citizens or homeowner associations expressing concern about speeding traffic in their neighborhoods. Often they request stop signs, speed humps, or increased traffic patrol as ways to mitigate the problem. Public Safety and Public Works staff have been exploring options for addressing these requests, focusing on initiatives that will be 1) safe, 2) economical, and 3) will not create liability issues for the City. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 L.., Page 14 One option that has come to our attention is the use of a radar smart trailer. These portable devices clock a driver's speed as he/she drives down the street and display it so that the driver is made aware of the speed at which he/she is traveling in relation to the posted speed limit. Such trailers are being used successfully in other cities, some of which have formal traffic management programs. Staff would like to discuss the use of such a trailer with the Council during Tuesday evening's meeting. If you have questions in the meantime, please feel free to call Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST (kr 30. ark Plan update moves forward. The Park Bo ard p continues its work to update the Southlake Parks, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan. They are currently mailing out questionnaires to "inventory" park facilities. These surveys are being sent to SPIN representatives, homeowner associations and private businesses offering recreational services or facilities. The Park Board will be holding focus group meetings during the last week in January, and is hoping SPIN reps can provide names of potential participants for this process. For more information, call Kim McAdams, Director of Parks and Recreation, at 481-5581 x757. 31. Speaking of Parks...Kim McAdams, who was recently appointed to the position of Director of Parks & Recreation, can now add the title "President" next to her name! Kim was recently elected President-Elect of the Parks and Recreation Association of the Texas (rtii..P Municipal League. Members of this association are Parks & Recreation Directors representing 85 cities in Texas. Join us in congratulating Kim! Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Page 15 32. Cable Channel Operational. As of Wednesday, November 1, the City began broadcasting bulletin board "pages" on Harron Cablevision Channel 25. At present, we have listed the City Council agenda items for the Tuesday, November 7 meeting, a schedule of upcoming meetings, and SPIN news items. We are currently developing a policy concerning use by organizations other than the City and CISD. We intend to have the JUC review the policy since it will apply to the City as well as the CISD. We have also begun discussions with Ms. Linda Rose, Carroll High School broadcast journalism teacher, about the possibility of utilizing her students to tape various meetings as well as produce informational programming. She is very excited about the project. We will go to City Council for approval once we have developed a proposal. For more (toe information, contact Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager, at ext. 710. 33. New Intern in the City Manager's Office - We are pleased to have Edward McRoy, a student at the University of Texas at Arlington, working part-time as our Administrative Intern. Ed has his Master's in Public Administration degree from Troy State University and is currently pursuing his Master's in City and Regional Planning. Being a planning student, he is also working part-time as a Planning Intern in the Community Development department. We expect him to be a valuable asset to our office. Please join us in welcoming him to a great learning opportunity here in Southlake! 34. Pending Litigation: VW Investments, Inc. et al vs. Southlake et al. On November 9, 1995 at 6:00 p.m., City Attorney E. Allen Taylor will brief the Board of Adjustment on the status of the case in an Executive Session. The trial date has been set for February 5, 1996. Any depositions should occur after the first of the year. L 35. Economic Development Strategic Plan. The second public meeting on the EDSP is scheduled for Wednesday, November 15 from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. at the Carroll High School Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Lie Page 16 cafeteria. A press release was prepared to inform the public and invitations were mailed to businesses and SPIN Standing Committee members. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Economic Development Coordinator Kate Barlow at ext. 776. 36. Enclosed in your packet is a copy of the final adopted corridor study document. If you should have any questions, contact Director of Community Development Greg Last. 37. Also enclosed is the Development Impact Fees study prepared by UTA. Recall that with my memo dated October 3, I included an excerpt from this study in your packet with a promise that the complete study would be following. If you have any questions, please call me. (111°' 38. is ute Mediation. David p Yelton-and Annette Skupin conducted mediation for the Southlake Dispute Resolution Center on October 9 and October 12 with two Southlake homeowners who could not resolve their differences regarding water runoff. A successful resolution was reached by both parties. Annette and David are to be thanked for their participation and their time spent on this endeavor. 39. FYI, we are in the process of preparing detailed reports to City Council on the following: * A request by residents in SouthRidge Lakes to install traffic signs on the roadway, and the possible ramifications. • Our complaint procedures. * Schedule of Ordinances to be drafted or amended. • Concealed weapons in Park Facilities. • A suggested City Council committee process, where City Council members would be officially appointed to serve on select committees to work with staff on specific Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 LPage 17 issues, (e.g., Human Resources, Budget and Finance, Facilities Planning, Roadways, etc.) and report back to the full Council. City's regulations on wood shingle roofs. 40. Committee to review RFPs for thoroughfare. We have received three qualified responses to our request for proposals from transportation engineers who will assist us in updating the Thoroughfare Plan in the next few months. Community Development staff is preparing a matrix comparison of the various proposals and will meet in the next few weeks with an interview committee including Councilmember Richarme, Commissioner Art Hobbs, SPIN Representative Joe Mast, Bob Whitehead, Greg Last and Tom Elgin. After selection of a consultant, we will bring forward a contract for services and begin the update process. 41. Denton Creek Pressure System Update. The Trinity River Authority (TRA) is now accepting bids until November 15 for Phase I of the Denton Creek Pressure System. Phase I includes the lift station, located at Kirkwood Creek and N. White Chapel Blvd., and the pressure line from the lift station to Precinct Line Road (in an easement from MTP). Construction should begin around the first of the year. Phase II of the Pressure System has been designed and easements are being acquired. The bidding process should begin in approximately two months. If you have any questions, please contact Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead. 42. North Davis Business Park Sewer Update. The sanitary sewer to serve N. Davis Business Park is 90% constructed. However, the east line from the business park to Continental Blvd. has been delayed. Since negotiations with Mr. Goode for an easement failed, staff needs to change the plans. Mr. Goode's last position was to charge each lot in N. Davis Business Park $2,000 (for a total of $38,000) for the easement along the west boundary Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest November 3, 1995 Page 18 of his property. Staff cannot recommend this amount. Staff is proceeding to design a pump to be placed in the east line at the southeast corner of the business park and pump the sewage to the east gravity line. Staff anticipates this cost to be $5,000-6,000. When Mr. Goode's property is platted, a sewer easement will need to be given to the City to enable the completion of this sewer line. 43. Timarron Street Distress Report. Recall that the City contracted with the firm of Wiss, Janney, Elstner and Associates, Inc., to conduct studies on street distress in the Timarron Addition. The soils investigation is complete and a draft is expected by November 13. Staff will then review the draft and a final geo-tech report should be ready by November 20-22. A draft summary report should be ready in mid-December. The consultants will meet with staff and contractors and issue a final report for presentation in early January 1996. 44. Carroll Baptist Church Sign. Carroll Baptist Church was issued a permit to construct a monument sign on August 11. The illuminated sign was constructed the next day, however, the brick base has yet to be built. The church requested an extension of the permit from Building Official Paul Ward, to allow them more time to construct the base. Paul granted them an extension to December 7, 1995. Staff is monitoring the situation and is staying in contact with representatives of the church. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Bob Whitehead or Paul Ward. 45. We got our City of Southlake Logo registered with the State (see notification attached to my memo). The SPIN logo will be next. 46. Update on Bond projects. You will fmd attached a fmancial update from Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, of the street bond projects showing actual revenues and expenditures as of September 30, 1995. During the budget work sessions, a similar report was • Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest (0..„ November 3, 1995 Page 19 distributed, showing information through July 31. The bold faced numbers on the September 30 report are those changed from the July report. Work has been completed on White Chapel from Big Bear Creek to S.H. 114, however not all payments have been made to the contractor. There is $2,900,264 available to fund the priorities set forth in the Capital Projects Budget, with E. Dove Road from White Chapel to Kimball the first project. 47. Note: > City Hall will be closed on the following days in observance of the holidays: November 23-24, Thanksgiving December 25-26, Christmas (hipe January 1, New's Year Day Please join us for the Employee Christmas Luncheon scheduled for noon December 18, City Council Chamber. > The annual Employee Banquet is scheduled for January 29, 6:00 p.m., at the Marriott Solana. 48. The Joint Meeting with City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss the Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance is scheduled for December 14. 49. Committee to Split the Planning and Zoning Commission: The committee to study the splitting of the Planning and Zoning Commission met on October 23 and discussed a variety of issues. The committee elected Jim Murphy chairman. It is anticipated that the committee will develop a summary of their goals at the next meeting and forward those L Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest LNovember 3, 1995 Page 20 to Council for confirmation in order to have a clear understanding of the direction they should proceed. Tentative meeting times for upcoming meetings are November 8th and the 14th at 6:00 p.m. 50. Please note, staff is currently working on the following complaints that you may have been contacted about: Gene Davis, 440 S. White Chapel Gary Hargett, 111 S. White Chapel We will be happy to provide you an update on our progress with these complaints at the meeting Tuesday evening. (lire C:\W P5I\CEH&CC\95-I 1-07.MTG L City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM October 24, 1995 TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager FROM: Charles Bloomberg, Plans Examiner SUBJECT: Stacy Furniture, Addition to building 280 Commerce Street I reviewed at least four variations of proposed additions to this building. I have review comments in my file dating from November of 1994 through August of this year. In each case I addressed the need for more detail plans and the existing building is over the allowable area for its construction type. In August I sent the plans to the City of Plano for an independent review. They substantiated my comments that the building would require either an automatic sprinkler system throughout, an upgrade in construction type, additional area separation walls, greater setbacks from property lines, or a combination of these items. At the same time Karen Gandy had discussions regarding the zoning issues that also needed to be resolved prior to building. In an effort to help Mr. Stacy meet his urgent needs we issued a building permit on August 23, 1995. This permit is for 46,490 square feet on the north end of the building for shell construction only. No interior finish and no occupancy is authorized. It is further conditioned that it is subject to approval of zoning and site plan by the City Council. (kr City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM October 25, 1995 TO: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety FROM: Jerry Williams, Deputy Director of Fire Services SUBJECT: Stacy Warehouse Stacy Warehouse was constructed in July, 1986 when the 1985 edition of the Uniform Fire Code was in effect in the City of Southlake(see attached). Under this code the warehouse was required to be sprinkler protected. At the time of construction, the City could not supply the needed water. Due to the City not being able to provide the needed water, a sprinkler system was not at that time installed but a standpipe system(system which brings water to different places in the building and has firefighting hoses attached)was installed. An underground vault and double check valve was installed on this standpipe system. (This vault and check valve are required by water quality standards and cost$10,000 to $15,000.) The water supply line for this standpipe system could be used to provide water to a sprinkler system. Existing buildings are not required to be retrofitted with sprinkler systems unless they are changed significantly. The proposal from Stacy is to add a mezzanine of approximately 20,000 square feet and open the building as a showroom instead of a warehouse, thus not only changing the square footage, but also the usage and occupancy load. The existing building will require additional exits and other modifications whether a sprinkler system is installed or not. If a sprinkler system is installed, some of the required modifications could be waived, such as travel distance to exits. Cost of installing a sprinkler system is significant but is somewhat offset by the lesser requirements to the other modifications. " The proposal to use the existing standpipe system to feed the sprinkler system in the proposed new warehouse on the north side of the existing building will work, however, the pipes cannot be routed through the existing unprotected building but must be underground. If they were routed through the unprotected building and a fire occurred in this building, the sprinkler system to the new building would probably be disabled. JW/bls T. City of Southlake L. Street Bond Projects As of September 30, 1995 Variance favorable/ Actual Budget (unfavorable) Revenues and Sources of Funds Bond Proceeds 4,501,137 4,500,000 1,137 Interest Earnings 356,622 0 356.622 Funds Available 4,857,759 4,500,000 357,759 Expenditures Administrative (bond issue costs) 24,437 0 (24,437) Engineering 357,674 0 (357,674) N. Carroll-Dove/Bumey 496,387 125,000 (371,387) N. Carroll-114/Dove 297,389 575,000 277,611 E. Continental-White Chapel/Carroll Timarron 125,000 125,000 E. Continental-Brumlow/Kimball County/General 0 0 E. Continental-Carroll/Brumlow County 0 0 N. Peytonville-north of 1709 County 0 0 S. Peytonville-Continental/1709 312,099 350,000 37,901 N. White Chapel-1709/114* 276,348 425,000 148,652 S. White Chapel-Big Bear/1709* 193.161 210,000 16,839 Lal Expenditures as of September 30, 1995 1,957,495 1,810,000 (147,495) Cash on Hand as of September 30, 1995 _2.900.264 Variance Estimate or favorable/ Encumbered Budget (unfavorable) Remaining Projects N. Carroll-1709/114 (excludes ROW to realign) 293,721 225,000 (68,721) S. Carroll-1709/Continental 326,580 190,000 (136,580) W. Continental-White Chapel/Davis 555,750 525,000 (30,750) E. Dove-White Chapel/Kimball** 859,000 825,000 (34,000) W. Dove-Randol Mill/Peytonville 28,607 80,000 51,393 W. Dove-Peytonville/Shady Oaks 142,100 125,000 (17,100) E. Highland-Carroll/Kimball 172,960 130,000 (42,960) W. Highland-Shady Oaks/White Chapel 121,900 100,000 (21,900) N. Kimball-Highland/Dove 185,430 140,000 (45,430) N. Kimball-1709/Highland 250,140 200,000 (50,140) N. White Chapel-114/Dove 121.000 100.000 (21.000) Total of remaining projects 3,057,188 2,640,000 (417,188) Grand Total expenditures all projects 5 014.68 3 4,450,000 (564,683) Funds Available (156.924) 50,000 Lost estimates include lateral drainage, ditching, and projected ROW. Final design may result in additional drainage improvements. Cost estimates exclude engineering fees. * Project currently completed, final payment not made. ** Project currently under design ,0(SV95 strt995.w4c4 , r: . CAPITAL PROJECTS 10/31/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 700-$3.0 MILLION FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1994 STREET BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest Income 0 102.067 75.000 • 108.000 77.000 Total Revenue 0 102,067 75,000 108,000 77,000 Expenditures Engineering contract 0 104,712 93,000 60,000 0 Brumlow-Continental/SH26(2) 0 0 270,000 0 0 N. Carroll-FM1709/SH114(1) 0 0 0 0 0 S. Carroll-FM1709/Continental Blvd. (1) 0 0 325,000 0 0 W. Continental-White ChapelDavis 0 0 0 0 555,750 E. Dove-White Chapel/Kimball(3) 0 0 900,000 0 859,000 W. Dove-Creek/Peytonville 0 0 0 0 28,607 W. Dove-Peytonville/Shady Oaks 0 0 0 0 142,100 E. Highland-Carroll/Kimball (3) 0 0 0 0 0 W. Highland-Shady Oaks/White Chapel 0 0 0 0 121,900 N. Kimball-Highland/Dove(ROW only-intersection)(3) 0 0 0 0 25,000 N. Kimball-SH114/Highland(3) 0 0 0 0 0 clis 'hite Chapel-SH114/Dove 0 0 0 0 121,000 hite Chapel-FM1709/SH114 0 0 555,000 334,020 0 hite Chapel-Big Bear Creek/FM1709 0 0 325.000 0 0 Total Expenditures 0 104,712 2,468,000 394,020 1,853,357 Net Revenue 0 (2,645) (2,393,000) (286,020) (1,776,357) Bond Proceeds(11/93) 0 3,001,137 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 3,001,137 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 2,998,492 2,998,492 2,712,472 Ending Fund Balance Q 2-998.492 605.492 2.712.472 936.115 (1)Road section design and construction on hold due to anticipated adjacent development, interim road sections vs. ultimate design/width, ROW considerations with alignment. (N. Carroll-$293,721; S. Carroll-$326,580) (2)Brumlow identified by Task Force, but not included as recommended project. The FY94-95 budget assumed funding would be available after all recommended projects were completed. Updated cost estimates for remaining projects indicate that no funding will be available for Brumlow. (3)Projects to be constructed in FY96-97. (E. Highland-$172,960; N. Kimball-SH114/Dove-$250,140; N. Kimball-Highland/Dove remainder-$160,430) Funds remaining from Fund 703, 1993 Street Bond Projects, will also be used. Priorities for FY95-96: 1. E. Dove-White Chapel/Kimball 2. N.White Chapel-SH114/Dove 3.W. Continental-White Chapel/Davis cion - W. Highland-Shady Oaks/White Chapel Kimball-Highland/Dove(widening intersection only) . Dove-Shady Oaks/Creek . :_,, L CAPITAL PROJECTS „ PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bnaba965wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 703-$1.5 MILLION FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1993 STREET BOND PROJECTS ActActual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest income 45.265 43.548 25.000 18.000 4.500 Total Revenue 45,265 43,548 25,000 18,000 4,500 Expenditures Engineering contract 135,339 51,985 10,000 0 0 Administrative expenses(bond issuance) 24,437 0 0 0 0 N. Carroll-Dove/Burney 148,838 351,535 0 0 0 N. Carroll-SH114/Dove 0 86,158 463,661 195,175 0 N. Carroll-FM1709/Continental 0 0 392,763 0 0 S. White Chapel-Big Bear Creek/FM1709 0 0 0 211,295 0 S. Peytonville Road-FM1709/Continental Blvd. 0 208.200 157.367 94.421 0 Total Expenditures 308,614 697,878 1,023,791 500,891 0 Net Revenue (263,349) (654,330) (998,791) (482,891) 4,500 Bond Proceeds(11/92) 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 Lsfers In 0 0 0 0 0 fers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Other Sources(Uses) 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 • Beginning Fund Balance 0 1,236,651 582,321 582,321 99,430 Ending Fund Balance 1.236.651 58Z321 (416.4701 99.4.11 103.930 Remaining funds to be used to construct projects identified in Fund 700, 1994 Street Bond Projects on the following page. C City of Southlake Street Bond Projects As of July 31, 1995 LVariance favorable/ Actual Budget (unfavorable) Revenues and Sources of Funds Bond Proceeds 4,501,137 4,500,000 1,137 Interest Earnings 304,318 0 304,318 Funds Available 4,805,455 4,500,000 305,455 Expenditures Administrative (bond issue costs) 24,437 0 (24,437) Engineering 348,309 0 (348,309) N. Carroll-Dove/Bumey 496,387 125,000 (371,387) N. Carroll-114/Dove 277,505 575,000 297,495 E. Continental-White Chapel/Carroll Timarron 125,000 125,000 E. Continental-Brumlow/Kimball County/General 0 0 E. Continental-Carroll/Brumlow County 0 0 N. Peytonvilleenorth of 1709 County 0 0 S. Peytonville-Continental/1709 312,099 350,000 37,901 Total Expenditures as of July 31, 1995 1,458,737 1,175,000 (283,737) Cash on Hand as of July 31, 1995 3.346.718 Variance (ilare Estimate or favorable/ Encumbered Budget (unfavorable) Remaining Projects N. Carroll-1709/114 (excludes ROW to realign) 293,721 225,000 (68,721) S. Carroll-1709/Continental 326,580 190,000 (136,580) W. Continental-White Chapel/Davis 555,750 525,000 (30,750) E. Dove-White Chapel/Kimball** 859,000 825,000 (34,000) W. Dove-Randol Mill/Peytonville 28,607 80,000 51,393 W. Dove-Peytonville/Shady Oaks 142,100 125,000 (17,100) E. Highland-Carroll/Kimball 172,960 130,000 (42,960) W. Highland-Shady Oaks/White Chapel 121,900 100,000 (21,900) N. Kimball-Highland/Dove 185,430 140,000 (45,430) N. Kimball-1709/Highland 250,140 200,000 (50,140) N. White Chapel-114/Dove 121,000 100,000 (21,000) N. White Chapel-1709/114* 334,020 425,000 90,980 S. White Chapel-Big Bear/1709* 211.295 210.000 (1.295) Total of remaining projects 3,602,503 3,275,000 (327,503) Grand Total expenditures all projects 5.061,240 4,450,000 (611,240) Funds Available (255.785) 50,000 -nst estimates include lateral drainage, ditching, and projected ROW. I design may result in additional drainage improvements. t estimates exclude engineering fees. * Project currently under contract ** Project currently under design 10/3195 svt895.vAc4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of Contract With Cheatham and Associates for the Year 2 Sewer Program, and Two Alternate Neighborhoods The attached proposal from Cheatham and Associates is to prepare construction plans and documents for the design of sanitary sewer systems to serve four (4) existing subdivisions. These subdivisions (Year 2 of the Neighborhood Sewer Program) are: Diamond Circle Estates Mission Hill Estates Huntwick Estates Shady Lane, Raintree and Rainforest Vicinities City Council needs to note that the proposal for "Shady Lane, Raintree and Rainforest vicinities," not only includes a design for a sanitary sewer system, lift station and force main in the area, but also includes a new water line design for those streets that have less than a six-inch water line, and plans for the reconstruction of the streets. City Council at their meeting on July 25, 1995 did resolve that the subdivisions of Hillside Estates and Hunter's Ridge be alternative neighborhoods for receiving sewer service, if any of the originally identified neighborhoods indicated via a post card poll that they were no longer interested in the sewer program. The attached amendment to Proposal for Professional Services for Design of Sewer Services provides for Cheatham and Associates to prepare the engineering plans for Hunter's Ridge and Hillside Estates for a total fee of$20,625.00. By completing these plans, they will be available for Council to include in the Year 2 Neighborhood Sewer Program if some other neighborhood drops out of the program. The proposed fee for the subdivisions in the Year 2 Program is $233,300 (see attached proposal, page 3) and $20,625 for the two additional subdivisions for a total fee of$253,925.00. This fee includes surveying, engineering design, preparation of construction plans and specifications, cost L r Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Proposal for Engineering Design-Sewer Systems November 1, 1995 Page 2. estimates, contract administration, construction staking, visits to the construction site, as-built plans, and easement preparation. It does not include soils tests, outside lab services, and assistance in acquiring easements. The fiscal year 1996-97 budget includes funding for the new water mains in the Shady Lane, Raintree, Rainforest vicinities and a statement that the Year 2 Sewer Program's construction funding along with the street reconstruction will be budgeted in fiscal year 1997-98 budget. However, to have plans approved and ready for bids on October 1, 1996 the engineer needs to proceed. The schedule for these projects would be: November 1995 Poll neighborhoods to assess their support of the program and the $1,300 participation fee. December - April Complete preliminary engineering design. May 1996 Meet with neighborhoods to explain proposed sewer system routing (sr and receive suggestions. July 1996 Complete final plans. July - Oct Acquire necessary easements Aug. 6, 1996 City Council to authorize advertisement for bids. Mid Sept. Open bids Oct. 1, 1996 Council award contract(s).* Nov. 1996 Construction to begin * Staffs current plans are for two contracts. Contract 1 - Mission Hill Estates and Diamond Circle Estates Contract 2 - Shady Lane vicinities and Huntwick Estates L • (owCurtis E. Hawk, City Manager Proposal for Engineering Design-Sewer Systems November 1, 1995 Page 3. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposal of Cheatham and Associates to provide professional services for the sewer system design of the Year 2 Neighborhood Sewer Program, plus the amendment added for two alternate subdivisions. Please place this on the November 7, 1995 agenda for Council consideration. VL/ BWfsm Attachments: Proposal Map showing 4 subdivisions Proposal Amendment Map showing 2 subdivisions wpdocs\wthead.mem\agenda\cheatham.yr2 L 7 CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES October 23, 1995 Mr. Bob Whitehead Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Proposal for Providing Professional Services in Connection with the Design of Sewer Systems in Four (4) Existing Residential Subdivisions CONSULTANT'S UNDERSTANDING There are several existing subdivisions within the City of Southlake which were developed prior to the availability of sanitary sewer service. These subdivisions consist of large lots, of at least one acre, and rely on septic tanks for sewer treatment, and lateral lines for disposal of effluent. The City has been striving to develop a sewer system which will be available to all residents. L., Many of the existing older subdivisions now have sewers readily available, once the internal collection system and service lines are installed. Therefore, the City of Southlake has directed Cheatham& Associates to prepare construction plans and associated documents to facilitate the construction of internal sanitary sewer systems to serve four (4) existing subdivisions. These subdivisions are: Diamond Circle Estates Mission Hill Estates Huntwick Estates Shady Lane, Raintree and Rain Forest Vicinities This scope of work for Diamond Circle Estates, Mission Hill Estates, and Huntwick Estates, shall include work related to a sanitary sewer system, to be constructed within the existing subdivisions, and provide sanitary service to each lot. There will be minimal amount of street repair associated with each project. The scope of work for the Shady Lane, Raintree and Rain Forest vicinities, shall include preparation of construction plans and specifications for a sanitary sewer system, lift station and force main for the area. Also included will be engineering services for a new water line, along all existing streets which currently do not have at least a six (6) inch line. Finally, the plans for this area will include the complete reconstruction of streets which are damaged due to the water and sewer line construction. K ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design,Inc. 1601 E.Lamar Blvd. •Suite 200•Arlington,Texas 76011 8.17/548-0696•Metro 265-8836•Fax 817/265-8532 CMr. Bob Whitehead October 23, 1995 City of Southlake Page 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Surveying 1.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary surveying field and office work necessary to perform the engineering design and to prepare construction plans. 1.2 We will also furnish all construction staking. 1.3 Surveying for easement preparation, if required, will also be furnished. (See Item 3.2) 2.0 Engineering 2.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary technical expertise required to accomplish the engineering design of the sewer lines. The design will be in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. 2.2 Our firm will then prepare construction plans, specifications and contract documents based on the engineering design. 2.3 We will assist in the advertising for and taking of construction bids. We will issue any required addendums. Our firm will assist in the processing of contract documents after contract award and will issue notice-to-proceed. 2.4 Periodic on-site visits by an engineer will take place during construction. We will issue and process any required change orders. 2.5 We will provide assistance in conducting the final inspection and issuance of certificate of completion. 3.0 Easements 3.1 Our firm will conduct the search for deeds and conduct other research at the Tarrant County Courthouse necessary for the preparation of the required easements. 3.2 We will then prepare the legal (metes &bounds) descriptions of the easements with computer plotting. This work element also includes the surveying work necessary to prepare easements and to tie easements to the base line(s). 3.3 This element includes preparation of the final written easement document and of the accompanying drawing. 3.4 This proposal does not contemplate our firm providing assistance in acquiring property owner's signatures, nor participating in any condemnation proceedings without additional compensation. C • Mr. Bob Whitehead October 23, 1995 City of Southlake Page 3 4.0 Inspection 4.1 We will not furnish full-time on-site construction inspection, but will make periodic visits to the site, and will be available for plan interpretations. FEES We will provide all the services and products described in the scope of services including all services necessary for engineering surveying, engineering, preparation of construction plans and specifications, preparation of construction cost estimates, contract administration, construction staking and periodic visits during construction, and as-built plans. [See Excerpts from the TSPE General Engineering Services Manual on the last two pages.] *Engineering Fee (Total Estimated Construction Cost of$2,193,832.00) --_- [Based on TSPE Curve A, 6.9% of Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost] $151,300.00 Surveying Fees [Flat fees based on estimate of time required times hourly rate for field party] Design Survey $48,500.00 Construction Staking 28,500.00 Easement Preparation (Lift Stations/Force Main) [Flat Fees based on estimate of time required times hourly rates for technicians] Research 1,500.00 Documents/drawings/field work 3.500.00 Total Professional Fees $ 233,300.00 Please note that all direct expenses, such as travel and printing, are included in the above fees. The fees cover only that work specified in the proposal. It does not include; - Soils testing - Other testing involving outside laboratory services - Revisions to material prepared beyond that specified in proposal The above listing of services or others not included in the basic fees may be added to our agreement at your request and approval of estimated costs or rates. * Estimated Construction Cost: Sanitary Sewer Lines '' $ 1,327,085 °.>-' t A 9 Water Lines 9' 228,247 :' Street Reconstruction f 638.500 ; 7e y 4' Total $ 2,193,832 _5-4g • Mr. Bob Whitehead October 23, 1995 City of Southlake Page 4 FEE SCHEDULE 1/01/95 Professional fees for studies and reports are calculated using hourly rates which include all wages, benefits, overhead and profit. The fees include all incidental costs and expenses(except where specifically noted), including all travel,out-of-pocket expenses,drafting,telephone, typing, etc.,plus direct expenses times a handling multiplier. The fees proposed for this project are based on the hours estimated for each phase of the project times hourly rates. The following is the current rate schedule used to calculate job fees. Principal Engineer $90.00 Registered Engineer $75.00 Registered Surveyor $75.00 Staff Engineer $70.00 CAD Technician $65.00 Technician $55.00 Construction Inspector $45.00 Drafter $45.00 Clerical/Technical Typist $45.00 4 Man Survey Crew $85.00 3 Man Survey Crew $75.00 TERMS Invoicing will be based on percentage of completion. Billing will normally occur around the first of each month and payment expected within ten working days. GUARANTEE Cheatham&Associates guarantee to maintain the fees presented herein for 90 days from the date of this proposal unchanged. C 5i97 • CMr. Bob Whitehead October 23, 1995 City of Southlake Page 5 If the above meets with your approval, this proposal can also serve as our agreement, which you may indicate by signing in the space provided below. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or requested modifications of the proposal. The opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Southlake is greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. f:\word\proposal\southlak\resident.sub C AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: Accepted this day of , 1995 By: Title: C Curve A is intended to apply to assignments of which the following are typical examples: Water, wastewater and industrial waste treatment plants Low cost, or complicated, waterfront and marine terminal facilities Complicated dams and hydro-power installations Small bridges and bridges which are complicated by involved geo- metrics and unsymmetrical features, or which require location and/or alternate design studies Grade crossing eliminations Urban streets and freeways, including related drainage facilities Water distribution lines under 16-inch diameter Sanitary sewage collection lines under 24-inch diameter *ow Pumping stations Air pressure tunnels Swimming pools Foundations Curl.T.A3 is intended to apply to less complicated assignments of which the following are examples: Large intercepting and relief sewers Storm sewers and drains Sanitary sewage collection lines 24-inch diameter and over Water distribution lines 16-inch diameter and over 11 Simple bridges and other structures of straightforward or conven- tional design Dams of average complexity Airport paving and grading Irrigation works, except pumping plants Railways Levees and flood walls, conventional Sewer and water tunnels(free air) Earthwork and dredging Highways and rural roads,except low-cost rural roads High-cost wharf facilities of conventional design Retaining walls and bulkheads, conventional Roads and streets C "/9 16 • Curves of Median Compensation CURVES A AND B C. o o d C al U .a t W in C 0 �1 •a C) •� O In O C V a1 2 o C L. N O i h C 7 Q '0 _ 41 C 4i O . y 4) � O . oQ • '13 +• to a) 4i C a « C.0 t N O 3 0 N l0 O .X a. C '� h •--i L 3 Gs1 N <0 .--1 Cbo O O :0 0.1 •'. y ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ go, a ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦ O .) co 4 4, ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ aW ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦��♦�♦♦♦ 0vs .0 ��-♦--- 121 ♦♦--♦-1111111♦1-1111♦♦♦ o co L m d= MMEMMENEME W a ���•1��•1//1��11•�� v1 A C-9� V y La ■■■■■■■ U W ■■■■■■■'.■1�■■.OV ■. O� Io -. aa om c d a ..t. 111111 ,,,,,,,��/.Mr 0i O-0 CC1 4) ^d ^ Ea d: incc Ts. .4 43 Ar O C A g EL. 4/ c Rio c 0 C Q 3 0 . y to 11111.1111111111111!i11I M1,.■■... , Fr O N,Q s U 0d4 co 0-c .G `m . — L. O p C O v 0 co 0 O C, lb' => 4Ci Z N 0 '4+O+ V C i C 0+�pp' C d V N =Y 0 C h41) . d • oa °' 8 ao C ''' OW c ''1440R = as 2 5 C O O too y O .O. Ta> ." V 41 C.)-Y1 V.00 C 4 0 U! F- d2 2 8 0= an d .0 V Cda d. C 41 N ^ gra ,•�oaOQE � C c.... .v•p - YV1 VI d 4 O Nt 10) N .4 0 W CO t. 41 IA Y C .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 w 1N33213d-302fVH3 3ISVB I-• O z • ... ...flOgra,.....1•FSINFAIME Min UNINI . ' r(. ; , '' /' ---,-- . • mall..111,..1•111r .7.0 VZ /.7 f :,..' .,..., --.44ii i • ,ie I fig 2. • 1 L .D. .... ','-„,--2:-" i c --- t-al• e I , ....!,:t. i 4 60 _ - :1: ----- ----:,, 4 /1" . '• IS \)0 :.:„.., i N . ,* t" NM • . / ../.', • BUIE 2' I' 1 .. ..... J ,..• - • / . - - • .. -1 111111.. ilorli, e. t El 1 SUMS , VENNI ,; .7.. I . . 'MI 1 . , rir4re'-,ittPMI '-low ,. :,,. • . ,. PFOROSE UK lio, Z '1' • I •. 4* / • .1., e I AT \7' # / • ,4:', Nii„.......4 .. DO . / • ., TATI IA . , I ISMS suostjawalav n 011*ISs7/'''':.•'!> 1\ =mom g 3 .....___, & OD MIND STREET. MI.,, 114.0...;...-- ; . N\a-CleXi \ ."-- ':, •.;.2:• ..- 1',Olt ' -1 '4111V al lal ; mit .,...... si;;,,,4.11.:, ,., .:• , .).., Do 4.#i „., ,, --.. hat • . °if ;••--;,-- . ... .et,. , • ..,; ,. ..._._DR _ _ ... -.•;: .., foil". IMP* -.0 " - • 1,A r • i:tf.I .. .._..AL., 1":, ,,.•A r hil Ir-'.:'...'. - .- ". • ..'I-!....±/. CITYrias si. . ). '' ) • - - ' 5 '''.. ''. . • ._,..ile .t. , • • 4 11117 ..arle . i - •'::''el. 14 . . ..• ,.........* , " - - POLES DSPT '••••=..L.....,.4..... ,-,. ' iii‘Wili 4 ,1 All 0..r° wermiirtirrt rmik '"-----ra,,....;:,,,,..;-11.1.1,1amar..L... i P*4 g PT4 4 9 I P ra iffr rij..7,• WV 7.' ,•,' ' - -. ••• . w...,..,....r.116. \..•.,i.„ Aiiib.--<,•._, A 7 ...: i AttSTIN '° 74killift - : 41111P4Z471 WAWA:1 .,..., : ii!no CATETID bear X TM .1 -.,.1, •‘' '. ,' __,.. H. i ••i •_ . I , 4° i,V 'In 1 /• • .rIP mall cc 1 411 a ..... .., 0 ' - 1 .-. ....... w ....- r U i(..., EAST ,,.-74 ) "•:i V- I G' i'EVINE i IO ... .,. - ... i : I I r , 0 i i-ii p •, LS.D. Iv ir- . - 5 Am. •=. .... ma - b, um , g 1 aluo ' li CARROLL Ry.e ...„..„ 00,rity. w LS.D. i HUM . •,- i ' . ,i1 ,•4 4',.:• ,• kiNCOMMES libili . 1 V,A. 1144% 0 I. S5510MR ' i,.!•''4.- ,• • r -- Is • CHEATHAM AND (..., ASSOCIATES October 27, 1995 Mr. Robert R. Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Amendment to Proposal for Professional Services for Design of Sewer Systems -.: (Dated October 23, 1995) Dear Mr. Whitehead: We recently prepared a proposal for professional services in connection with the design of sewer systems for four(4)existing residential subdivisions. We have been asked to modify the proposal to include the design of sewer systems for an additional neighborhood. There are two (..., subdivisions under consideration for being added to the current list of sewer projects. These two subdivisions are Hunter's Ridge and Hillside Estates. Therefore,we have included,for your consideration,the engineering and surveying fee for each project, and an enclosed engineer's estimate of construction cost. If the City decides to add one,or both,of these subdivisions to the current list of four(4) sewer projects,this letter shall serve as an amendment to the proposal dated October 23, 1995. All conditions and terms contained within the original proposal shall apply to the additional services. The action of the City Council shall dictate if one or both of these projects, as presented,are included. The additional fee for professional services is proposed as follows: Hunter's Ridge Engineering Fee $ 6,000.00 Surveying Fee Design Survey 2,000.00 Construction Staking 1,500.00 Easement Preparation 750.00 Total Professional Fees $ 10,250.00 C .S ,9 la— ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design,Inc. 1601 E.Lamar Blvd. •Suite 200•Arlington,Texas 76011 817/548-0696•Metro 265-8836•Fax 817/265-8532 Mr. Robert R. Whitehead, P.E. October 27, 1995 City of Southlake Page 2 Hillside Estates Engineering Fee $ 5,900.00 Surveying Fee Design Survey 1,950.00 Construction Staking 1,400.00 Easement Preparation 1.125.00 Total Professional Fees $ 10,375.00 If the above meets with your approval, this letter can serve as our agreement. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. E\word\proposallsouthlak\sewer.dsg Enclosures C Authorization to Proceed: (Please indicate the project approved for design) Hunter's Ridge Project Hillside Estates Project Both Hunter's Ridge&Hillside Estates Projects Accepted this day of 1995 By: Title: Mayor C CHEATHAM &ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD., SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SANITARY SEWER TO SERVE HUNTER'S RIDGE JOB NO.001-402 DATE: JULY 24, 1995 SHEET 1 OF 1 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT TOTAL NO. QTY. PRICE COST 1. 6"SDR 35(8'-10')TRENCH L.F. 1125 16.00 $18,000.00 2.- 6"SDR 35(10'-12')TRENCH L.F. 1125 20.00 $22,500.00 3. STD.4'DIA.MANHOLE EA. 8 1250.00 $10,000.00 4. 'EXTRA DEPTH MANHOLE V.F. 35 100.00 $3,500.00 5. 4"SHORT SIDE SERVICES EA. 9 250.00 $2,250.00 6. 4"LONG SIDE SERVICES EA. 10 350.00 $3,500.00 7. STD.CLEAN OUT EA. 2 350.00 $700.00 8. CONCRETE DRIVE REPAIR L.F. 300 25.00 $7,500.00 9. HMAC STREET REPAIR L.F. 100 20.00 $2,000.00 (..., 10. REPLACE EXIST.CULVERTS L.F. 300 20.00 $6,000.00+ 11. BORE DRIVES/TREES LF. 100 30.00 $3,000.00 12. CRUSHED STONE EMBEDMENT C.Y. 450 17.50 $7,875.00 SUBTOTAL CONSI COST $86,825.00 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ENGINEERING $6,000.00 SURVEYING $3,500.00 CONTINGENCY $7,675.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $104,000.00 WUNTER95 C • C CHEATHAM&ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD.,SUITE#200 ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76011 817/548-0696 - METRO 817/265-8836 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SANITARY SEWERAGE FACILITIES TO SERVE HILLSIDE ADDITION &VICINITY JOB NO. 001-424 DATE: JULY 24, 1995 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT TOTAL NO. QTY. PRICE COST 1 6"SEWER LINES(6-8'DEPTH) L.F. 710 15.00 $10,650.00 2 6"SEWER LINES(8'-10'DEPTH) L.F. 710 16.00 $11,360.00 3 6"SEWER LINES(10'-12'DEPTH) L.F. 710 20.00 $14,200.00 4..<.,STD.SEWER M.H.(0'-6'DEPTH) EA. 6 1250.00 $7,500.00 5 EXTRA DEPTH OF MH(EXCESS OF 6') V.F. 24 100.00 $2,400.00 6 CRUSHED STONE C.Y. 450 17.50 $7,875.00 7 '6"CORED MH CONNECTIONS EA. 1 1000.00 $1,000.00 8 6"BORED CROSSING TREE CONFLICTS LF. 10 50.00 $500.00 9 4"SEWER SER. INSTALLATIONS EA. 15 350.00 $5,250.00 10 4"SEWER SERVICE BORES L.F. 270 20.00 $5,400.00 11 4"PVC SEWER SERVICE PIPE L.F. 600 10.00 $6,000.00 12 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT LF. 175 25.00 $4,375.00 (60, 13 ASPHALT ROADWAY REPLACEMENT LF. 50 30.00 $1,500.00 14 TRENCH SAFETY LF. 2130 1.10 $2,343.00 15 EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM LS. 1 5000.00 $5,000.00 SUBTOTAL CONST.COST $85,353.00 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ENGINEERING $5,900.00 SURVEYING $3,350.00 CONTINGENCY $8,397.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $103,000.00 SOWHLAKEIESTIMATEW ILLSIDE.WB2 Vx C W ..1-'4441 I Illthill '• ", \ r meal. • IT(9- ) .\\111111..-- Aill l'.' '\ \N.. :‘- in. 411,,,Lr„......40,, , ,, :: . ,,\, ..,. A A,.. I WI - "1" , ii .'‘'. . \"rir:i , .. R T, Ifil: , ._ - ''''''' . MP [am" --NV .4 - . . : 1 c, so ip rn >, .40....„ _ ,11 1_, _. is .:,7,2 1 4 \ ' \\ ' 0 taj "-..-rmi 11111VAN r--\\ \\ qv: A74•7 moo - 7f lit Iv 01) " i t„ ,. .- tom. Lrx I.R . . rt a �F j e 0 L1f obir :7_4 e=i :, .._, -� - w _ fps 0 Q ..,, --, I �Q,, �� ...,___ -.., :: a I":4. . '" ' ,,..,' . Pld, 1 �� . 0:. :11511111:-411- ,.,j':: 11144P-4‘°*14111111. ' ' 1189*-:1111: ;41'1001_ , ' t,. ,,...,.. ..H...--- . to IR - u . rF ji . e • 1 riti :•-•':‘ .:'—'• - ' ' 1:ir, -,• °""1.: 11,41:9' .1.4 '1 f,00414.„„ 1 , . /. .- ... , ? . . . , ,. , :. : , :, _. tm, ,,,. : .... :,,. . ,... ... 4, ki.ntl--a- , I. goy 1 = a ... . - �� .: 3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Engineering Services Dunaway Associates We have received a proposal from Dunaway Associates to perform engineering services in conjunction with the 1995-1996 roadway improvement projects. The projects to be included under this contract include West Highland(White Chapel to Shady Oaks), White Chapel (114 to Dove), West Dove Road (114 to Westlake City Limit) and intersection improvements at Kimball and Highland and Kimball and Dove. Dunaway Associates has performed engineering services for the City on the White Chapel improvements project from Bear Creek to State Highway 114. In addition, this firm has completed the design of the improvements on Randoll Mill from 1709 to Fawkes Road. The proposed cost for these services is $62,635 and includes all survey work, design, and construction administration assistance. The work performed by Dunaway on previous projects has been excellent and timely. We recommend that the Mayor be authorized to execute this contract and we request that this item be placed on the City Council agenda for November 7, 1995. RJH/rj Lye 5/3i STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OFTARRANT § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: C § That the City of Southlake, a municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County, Texas, acting herein by and through Gary Fickes, its duly elected Mayor,hereinafter called"City", and Dunaway Associates, Inc., acting herein by and through James E. DeOtte, P.E., its duly authorized Vice President, hereinafter called "Engineer",hereby make and enter into the following agreement: ARTICLE I.SERVICES Section 1. For an in consideration of the covenants herein contained, Engineer hereby covenants and agrees as an independent contractor, to perform the services hereinafter described with diligence and in accordance with the highest professional standards customarily obtained for such services in the State of Texas. The services to be performed by Engineer hereunder shall include rehabilitative designof paving, lighting, p g, drainage, street gh g, pavement marking, culverts and all other necessary design and engineering work for improvements in connection with the following projects and locations: • 1. WHITE CHAPEL ROAD(S.H.114 to DOVE ROAD) 2. WEST DOVE ROAD(S.H.114 WEST to CITY LIMIT) 3. WEST HIGHLAND ROAD(WHITE CHAPEL to SHADY OAKS DRIVE) 4. INTERSECTION of KIMBALL ROAD and DOVE ROAD 5. INTERSECTION of KIMBALL ROAD and HIGHLAND ROAD Section 2. The services to be performed by Engineer shall also inclu #1): de the following (also see Attachment 1) When requested by the City, the Engineer shall attend preliminary conferences with authorized representatives of the City regarding the project and such other conferences as may be necessary in the opinion of the City so that the plans and specifications which are to be developed hereunder by the Engineer will result in providing facilities which are economical in design and conform to instruction from the City. 2) The Engineer shall attend such conferences with officials of other agencies as may be necessary in the opinion of the City for coordination of the proposed street and storm drain improvements with the requirements of such other agencies. It shall be the Engineer's duty hereunder to secure necessary information from such agencies. 3) The Engineer shall advise the City with regard to the necessity for subcontract work such as special surveys, tests, test borings, or other subsurface investigations in connection with design and engineering work to be performed hereunder. The Engineer shall also advise the City concerning the results of same. Such surveys, tests, and investigations shall be made only upon authorization by the City. 4) During the Concept Phase the Engineer shall coordinate with all utilities as to any proposed utility lines or adjustment to existing utility lines within the project limits. The Engineer shall show the location of the proposed utility lines, existing utility lines and any adjustments (11.0" and/or relocation of the existing lines within the project limits. The Engineer shall show on the preliminary and final plans the location of the proposed utility lines, existing utility lines and any adjustments and/or relocation of the existing lines. t c5-Ba . 5) The Engineer shall provide necessary field surveys. 6) Engineer shall provide detailed design data, cross-sections, profiles, drainage calculations, estimates of cost and complete detailed plans and specifications. Design guidance shall be obtained from NCTCOG,TxDOT,and AASHTO. 7) The Engineer shall submit six (6) copies of Phase 1 plans in preliminary form as may be necessary in the opinion of the City for review by the City and for submission to utility companies and other agencies for the purposes of coordinating work with existing and proposed utilities. The Phase 1 plans shall indicate location of existing/proposed utilities and storm drain lines. 8) The Engineer shall furnish six (6) copies of detailed Phase 2 Final Drawings and six (6) copies of Specifications for Construction as authorized by the City for use in obtaining bids, awarding contracts, constructing and completing the proposed improvements. The Engineer shall furnish and indicate on the plans the location of existing and proposed utilities and storm drains. 9) The Engineer shall furnish twenty (20) copies of Phase 2 Final Construction Drawings and twenty (20) bound copies of the Contract Documents containing the Notice to Bidders, Proposal, Labor Rates, Experience Records, General and Special Provisions, Specifications, Insurance Statement,Performance and Payment Bonds,and Contract forms. 10) The Engineer shall furnish two (2) copies of detailed cost estimates and proposals for authorized construction,which shall include summaries of bid items and quantities. 11) The Engineer shall secure the approval of the City of the fmal plans andspecifications. Evidence of suc approval shall be the signatures of authorized City officials inscribed on the plans. Approval by the City shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Engineer, its officers, agents, employees and subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of the services performed hereunder, including but not limited to designs, working drawings and specifications or other engineering documents. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any error, omission,defect or negligence in the performance of such services, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City signifies the City's approval of only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. 12) The Engineer shall assist in the tabulation and review of all bids received for the construction of the improvements, and shall make recommendations to the City concerning these bids. • At any time during the construction of this project, the Engineer shall advise on special aspects of the project at the request of the City. The Engineer will review and approve shop drawings as necessary. 13) The original drawings of all plans shall be drawn in ink on approved plastic film sheets, or as otherwise approved by the Public Works Director, and shall become the property of the City. City may use such drawings in any manner it desires; provided, however, that the Engineer shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project other than the project described herein. 14) The City shall pay for necessary soils testing and furnish a report of the test information to the Engineer for its use. _2_ S8-3 15) The Engineer shall determine the rights-of-way and easement needs necessary for the construction of the project and furnish same to the City. The Engineer shall provide the necessary land survey, Deed and Abstract Records search, rights-of-way maps, and descriptions of properties to be acquired upon authorization from the City. ARTICLE IL COMPENSATION For all engineering services performed hereunder, inc .' g local travel, supplies and incidentals the City agrees to pay the Engineer a fee in an amount equal se times the salary cost of its employees engaged on the project. Salary cost shall be equal to the cost of aries of employees' time directly chargeable to the project, plus 32 percent for social security contributions, unemployment, excise and payroll taxes, unemployment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave, vacation, and holiday pay applicable thereto. The following hourly salary rates shall apply to this contract: Maximum Position Salary Cost Principal $47.85/Hour Project Manager $34.90/Hour Senior Engineer $27.00/Hour Senior Technician $22.25/Hour Technician $19.25/Hour Senior Draftsman $17.75/Hour Draftsman $12.00/Hour Administration/Clerical $15.00/Hour The City shall pay the Engineer for all subcontract work authorized by the City at the actual invoice cost. The City shall pay the Engineer for reproduction work at the current commercial rates. In no event shall the payment by the City for all work and services performed hereunder exceed the total sum of$62,635.00 for engineering and surveying as outlined in this contract. Method of Payment Partial payment shall be made monthly upon receipt of an invoice from the Engineer outlining the amount of hours worked by each employee, the employee's name and classification, and the employee's salary rate along with itemized charges for any subcontract, reproduction and survey work performed during the period covered by said invoice. The aggregate of such monthly partial payments shall not exceed the following: Until satisfactory completion of Phase 1 hereunder, a sum not to exceed 65% of the maximum fee, less previous payments. Until satisfactory completion of Phase 2 hereunder, a sum not to exceed 80% of the maximum fee, less previous payments. . Until satisfactory completion of Phase 3 hereunder, a sum not to exceed 90% of the maximum fee, less previous payments. Balance of earnings to be due and payable upon satisfactory completion of Phase 4. -3- 5. • ARTICLE III.PHASES AND SCHEDULES Engineering work on this project shall be completed according to the following schedule: Phase 1: Conceptual analysis, preliminary construction plans and detailed right-of-way requirements shall be submitted for review by the City and utility companies and other agencies within 45 calendar days after approval of this concept study and report. The project shall be divided into two sections in the event right-of-way acquisition appears to be a delay; Phase 2: Final construction plans and specifications shall be submitted for final review within 21 calendar days after receipt of City's Phase 2 review comments. Phase 3: Advertising/Bidding Phase shall take approximately 45 days. Phase 4: Construction/As Built Phase shall run for the duration of construction (estimated to be 180 days). Upon completion, the Engineer shall provide one (1) set of As-Built Drawing with.DWG files. ARTICLE IV.COORDINATION WITH OWNER The City shall make available to the Engineer for use in performing services hereunder all existing plans, maps, field notes, statistics, computations and other data in the City's possession relative to existing facilities and to the project. C ARTICLE V.PROGRESS REPORT The Engineer shall submit monthly progress reports to the Director of Transportation and Public Works. If the Engineer determines in the course of making design drawings and specifications that the cost estimate of $757,370.00 will be exceeded, whether by change in the scope of the project, increased costs or other conditions, the Engineer shall immediately report such fact to the City's Transportation and Public Works Director and, if so instructed by the Transportation and Public Works Director, shall suspend all work hereunder. ARTICLE VI.TRANSFER OF CONTRACT The Engineer shall not assign, sublet or transfer, in whole or in part, its interest in this agreement with the prior written consent of the City. ARTICLE VII.TERMINATION OF CONTRACT Section 1. The city may terminate this contract at any time and for any cause by a notice in writing to the Engineer. Upon receipt of such notice the Engineer shall immediately discontinue all services and work and the placing.of all orders or the entering into contracts for supplies, assistance, facilities, and materials, in connection with the performance of this contract and shall proceed to cancel promptly all existing contracts insofar as they are chargeable to this contract. Section 2. If the City terminates this contract under the foregoing Section 1., the City shall pay the Engineer a reasonable amount for services performed prior to such termination, which payment shall be based upon the payroll cost of employees engaged on the work by the Engineer up to the date of termination of the -4- �� � Litecontact and for subcontract, reproduction, and survey work in accordance with the method of compensation stated in ARTICLE II.hereof. Section 3. All completed or partially completed reports prepared under this contract, including the original drawings, shall become the property of the City when the contract is terminated, and may be used by City in any manner it desires; provided, however, that the Engineer shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project other than the project described in this contract. ARTICLE VIII.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Engineer covenants and agrees that it will perform the work hereunder as an independent contractors, and not as an officer, agent, servant, or employee of the City, that the Engineer shall have exclusive control of and the exclusive right to control the details of the work performed hereunder, and all persons performing same, and shall be liable for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants;that the doctrine of respondeat superior shall not apply as between the City and the Engineer, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants, and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint enterprise between City and Engineer. • ARTICLE IX.DISCLOSURE By signature of this contract,the Engineer warrants to the City of Fort worth that he has made full disclosure in writing of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest, including personal financial interests, direct or indirect, in property abutting the proposed project and business relationships with abutting property owners. The Engineer further warrants that he will make disclosure in writing of any conflicts of interest which develop subsequent to the signing of this contract and prior to final payment under the contract. ARTICLE X.INSURANCE The Engineer shall not commence work under this contract until it has obtained Professional Liability Insurance as required hereunder and such insurance coverage has been approved by the City. Such insurance shall be in the minimum amount of $250,000.00 and shall include coverage of Contractually Assumed Liability. The insurance coverage prescribed herein shall be maintained throughout the period which Engineer furnishes its services hereunder and shall not be canceled, modified or altered in any manner without prior written notice to the City. In this connection, upon the signing and return of this contract by the Engineer, a Certificate of Insurance shall be furnished to the City as evidence that the insurance coverage required herein has been obtained by Engineer,and such certificate shall contain the provision that such insurance shall not be canceled,modified or altered-with thirty(30)days prior written notice to the City. ARTICLE XI.RIGHT TO AUDIT (a) The Engineer agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this contract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of the Engineer involving transactions relating to this contract. The Engineer agrees that the City shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary Engineer facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance (WI with the provisions of this section. The City shall give the Engineer reasonable advance notice of intended audits. -5- 5 86 r co, (b) The Engineer further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that the subcontracting consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under the subcontract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such consultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and, further, that City shall have access during normal working hours to all consultant facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space,in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article.The City shall give the consultant reasonable advance notice of intended audits. ARTICLE XII.VENUE Venue of any suitor cause of action under this contract shall lie in Tarrant County,Texas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereby have executed this agreement in triplicate originals on this date, the day of , 19_ CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES, INC. (ENGINEER) / , is , ci." By: By: '� ..� f' . Gary Fickes,Mayor :i es E.DeOtte,P.E. R.P.L.S., President' Address: 1501 Merrimac Circle, Suite 100 Fort Worth,Texas 76107-6572 ATTEST: ATTEST: C°4- City Secretary Secretary C _6_ 58 7 . . SUMMARY I. Preliminary $46,335.00 II. Final Design 8,400.00 III. Advertise 1,660.00 IV. Construction 5,540.00 Printing/Reproduction 700.00 TOTAL $62,635.00 5Sef !* City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution No. 95-48, Abandonment of a Twenty-Foot Sanitary Easement, and Acceptance of a New Sanitary Sewer Easement on the Thnarron-Golf Villas A & B The S-6 sanitary sewer was built in an easement granted by Timarron. With the platting and construction of the Timarron-Golf Villas, the sewer was reconstructed in a new alignment (see attached Timarron Addition Golf Villas A and B.) Mr. Yetts of Timarron has requested that the City abandon the portion of the sanitary sewer easement in the Golf Villas Addition and accept a new easement over the realigned S-6 sewer. Carter and Burgess, Inc. will provide the legal descriptions and exhibits prior to the November 7, 1995 Council meeting. Resolution 95-48, Quitclaim Deed, and Utility Easement have been prepared for Council consideration. Please place this on the November 7, 1995 agenda. Lo tX BW/sm Attachments: Timarron Letter Resolution 95-48 Quitclaim Deed Sanitary Sewer Dedication wpdocs\wthead.mem\agenda\timease.rel 5c Timarron I'S I. Cuntincnt I tiu ithlalr. hcxa,-6092 (111/e 81---1 81-9 509 TIMARRON November 1, 1995 Mr. Bob Whitehead Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Reference: Timarron - Golf Villas Sanitary Sewer Easements Dear Mr.. Whitehead: (larr, Attached for your review is an exhibit depicting a proposed sanitary sewer line easement abandonment as well as a dedication of like kind. The S-6 sanitary sewer line has been relocated to the area shown outside the Golf Villa Final Plat boundary. As such, we are proposing an abandonment of a portion of the original easement and an easement dedication for the newly constructed facility. It is our request to be placed on the November 7, 1995, City Council agenda for consideration of both the easement abandonment and dedication. Complete legal descriptions and exhibits will be provided prior to the Council meeting. Thank you for consideration of this matter. Resp- Ily, dilliprze.,tastrivmr7arfArfA.,. Yetts Timarron L. d Corporation SY/pmk cc: Todd Janssen, Carter & Burgess, Inc. C Mobil Land ,. �7 ,``' R Ake `� •'...A �" /err !: 9898 Sr . .;�4l� �S "''%... _ r. w.w w. r_4w+Y.�1 {l I "" .. '.�.;.. i` ''�. • . ,'' 7871 Sr 1 r ;•`• 6 r r • �^ J 'VARfABLE j;_, _` —_. — ' _ ri sir. 78R Sr r: • 9923.'ic /.::+'.,WIDTH DE: :x. i 28 fiI ::- I: e627 Sr :: 7813 sr / / ?/ 103s1 sr '., j: , 0732 sr Ts.' sr ` T813 sr.. ;: -_ ' 7't; •::::. .,�' ,,,.. .' I._I , •~ vi ♦ • / Jr •f 5?- .' Li el 1 f"•'r• J _ 00 N. - ,•• �Frl ` _ ,N #in i 1 BLOCK 39 dr i t t• ie ••` d_f:.=i� ,r• 10769 Sr •9018 sr • .w .r: j:: :Iv 3 3 J�^'. ... ,a .l'r `` .tPfbf�T�1OI OF EXIST NG #- 0 ' Ij } 1044T Sr W500 Sr 10350 Sr rr_ 6 r:i EM :•1 V • i •fir... f�.i .. ... r' 4' �'•� �-�• BAN NE� 4 .�:.:,.:`'• W ,.� _ � L.�;:::'—�— �-; .;�: 4346 Sr/,r: r` '� w� ;.— 20'EMERGENCY ._ _ _... _.-_. • �j j• rs'�s. C2i s_. ', - 1.- ACCESS-E7 MEN-1`Lfa O ✓ iS.'� a • . ...Y G, •4 4I d•' . ' ., '.i:•:,, 7r.e _ •<:�• { •:or: 12866sr _...,-....-.;...;.ti .-_•. 1. Ma:,� J� • 1• v Mitt _.,. r :• 5/ / air;e'•" ?. :....; ic .. , PREVr14IIS .'6 Lk•A N ..;-: fen sr \:4./ ,,ria ! "f...:•• ? X':;!r -+ 'i' 7d - 9 ... 0 Sr 10640 Sr .1 . 02 �`,# 17985 Sr:,+"• .. 1: t 9021 sr i "" I Sr 1 ?. _ " � ,..; ; •. _:: � .,. •' � �: ' t.0 BLOCK 4 '`�. m, .. ....� l rar is ..?•,:• 10273 sr r .;, r........... r..+J"r" .✓'r'• 4 .. �..., erg I k. - ^Le..ra-..'A:..1.•?.,.,:... ..••.•„..-'IOz•i•W-,::.•':-...•i.-..1•.1:-ft•• .._... ;; , t/ 20' SANITARY, .L -+J - _ 7�—f3j 3-1a' ,}j ice/ SEWER EASE T 7.6'.,_.• .1.44.S.z.-.:•;3..,•,.,.,.- -, ' "/`EXISTING BBE DEDI; TED tPPROX . LIMITS d/ SEWER EASEMENT 1 1 0 ', I00 ''R FLOODPLAIN VOL.9955.PG.326:i N REALIGNED S-6 LOCATION a ' '"""PORTION Or 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT i ! VOL. 9955,PG.326. ABANDONED BY INSTRUMENT • 3 RECORDED IN VOL. .PG. . APPROVED PRELIM NARY PLAT TIMARRON LAND CO PGRA T ION VOL. 9813, PG.,,,,315 GOLF COUR E, • x , 3 ‘ R a, , .,�.. \ X TIMARRON ADDITION if %,.....a.��;I \;'�� GOLF VILLAS A & B I. if (1...„ ' _'\ 5 C3 '+'; ' CarternBurgess _f \� Carter 11. Burg�e•ssss,..rtc. 7950 Orebro* drive Dabs.Texas 75247-4961 '� ., i� (214)633-0145 Matra 263-2019 Fax (2M)638-0 47 (111e. RESOLUTION NO. 95-48 A RESOLUTION VACATING AND ABANDONING A TWENTY-FOOT WIDTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT,IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, INTEREST OR CONTROL OF SAID VARIABLE TWENTY-FOOT WIDTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Whereas,the City of Southlake is a home rule city acting under it's charter adopted by Lie the electorate pursuant of Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and Whereas,a twenty-foot width sanitary sewer easement has previously been dedicated to the City of Southlake by the previous owner of the affected property in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas Whereas,the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration,has determined that said twenty-foot width sanitary sewer easement located on property owned by Timarron Land Corporation in accordance with the deed recorded in Vol. 9813,Page 2375, DRTCT is not being used by,nor useful or convenient to the public in general; therefore, it constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit,and the public would be better served and benefitted by its vacation and abandonment. Said twenty-foot width sanitary sewer easement is more specifically described on the attached exhibits: .� c 4 Coe Exhibit A: Metes and Bounds Description Exhibit B: Graphic Depiction Whereas, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said variable width drainage easement,the City desires to execute a Quit Claim Deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said easement to the owner of the property recorded in Vol. 9813, Page 2375, DRTCT. and his heirs, and assigns. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: SECTION 1 The twenty-foot width sanitary sewer easement, as described herein, is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefitted by its vacation and abandonment. Accordingly,the above described twenty-foot width sanitary sewer easement located on property owned by Timarron Land Corporation in accordance with the deed recorded in Vol. 9813, Page 2375, DRTCT, City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas is hereby vacated and abandoned as public property and such area so abandoned shall revert in fee simple to the owner of the remainder of said property. SECTION 2 The Mayor of the City of Southlake,Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title,ownership,or control of the twenty-foot sanitary sewer easement on behalf of the City of Southlake,Texas. A copy of said quitclaim deed shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County,Texas by the office of (imo• the City Secretary. PCs SECTION 3 This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS day of 1995. Mayor Attest: City Secretary L L 5c ( QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and for other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,the City of Southlake (Grantor),does hereby bargain, sell,release,vacate,abandon and forever quit claim unto:Timarron Land Corporation and any and all of their heirs, legal representatives or assigns, all of Grantor's right,-ritle,and interest in and to the property described on Exhibit"A" and shown on Exhibit"B," attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. (kary TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right,title, and interest in and to the above described property unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs,legal representatives or assign shall have,claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid property premises or appurtenances or any part thereof. EXECUTED this the day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes,Mayor Lie 1 � c 7 Lie STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 1995,by Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission expires: Type or Print Notary's Name Grantee Address: Return to: (lbw Timarron Land Corporation City Secretary City of Southlake 175 E. Continental Blvd. 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake,Texas 76092 Southlake.Texas 76092 forms\quitclaim.frm (hie 5C8 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION UTILITY EASEMENT ABANDONMENT BEING AN UTILITY EASEMENT 20' WIDE LYING 10' ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERUNE, SITUATED IN THE BARNETT AND HOLUNGSWORTH SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.797, THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED TO TIMARRON LAND CORP., (FORMERLY BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES, INC.), AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 9813, PAGE • 2375 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID CENTERUNE BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS N 29°14'06"W A DISTANCE OF 30.39 FEET FROM A 5/8"CAPPED"CARTER&BURGESS"FOUND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TIMARRON ADDITION,GLENDOVER,AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1709, OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING S 85°50'14" E A DISTANCE OF 365.46 FEET FROM AN 5/8"IRON ROD FOUND AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED TO JOE WRIGHT,AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 7303,PAGE 572,OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS, THENCE S 00°10'48"W,A DISTANCE OF 56.39 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE N 89°25'19'W,A DISTANCE OF 214.75 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 03°24'55' E,A DISTANCE OF 263.64 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 09°15'30' E,A DISTANCE OF 344.17 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 15°45'19" E,A DISTANCE OF 300.13 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 00°42'26"W,A DISTANCE OF 233.51 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; (ire THENCE S 37°25'23"W,A DISTANCE OF 273.08 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 51°05'35"W,A DISTANCE OF 262.12 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 29°44'56"W,A DISTANCE OF 291.08 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 03°42'08" E,A DISTANCE OF 302.19 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER: THENCE S 41°41'59"W,A DISTANCE OF 30.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT; THENCE S 41°41'59"W,A DISTANCE OF 167.78 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 04°06'01"W,A DISTANCE OF 113.20 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 45°47'55" E,A DISTANCE OF 107.47 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER AND THE END OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CENTERLINE AND CONTAINING 0.178 ACRES OF LAND. SHEET 1 OF 2 FAPROJECTS TIMARROM952080011SDATA1060EX002.FNS %doe,OF NNi .N"N•1N 1 . Q,c v e.VEDRO 4934 ,� .:0 L 1 -9s 5'c 9 (lar" „ POINT OF COMMENCING CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD 36,f'.46 NIi14'06.w 3/6'AV ! 30.39 214.75 - ' , riv N 89'25'19" W \ SO0'10'48"W to S 03'24'55" E 56.39 263.64 I 0 2 TIMARRON ADDITION Z GLENDOVER CAB. A, SLIDE 1709 kP p P.R.T.C.T. Z S 09'15'30" E - 344.17 9'Q/11-WA Y TIMARRON ADDITION S 15'45'19" E \ STRATHMORE 300.13 CAB. A, SLIDE 2395 P.R.T.C.T. S 00'42'26" W 233.51 / \ L • /372523'W S 51'05'35" W 273.08 262.12 EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT VOL. 9955, PG. 326 S 29'44'56" W D.R.T.C.T. 291.08 (TO REMAIN) / TIMARRON LAND CORP. VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 POINT OF D.R.T.C.T. BEGINNING S 03'42'08" E 302.19 S 41'41'59" W OP 167.78 10211AVA' �� S 41'41'59"" W � 0' UTILITY EASEMENT 30.98 «.....�. .«. i... i 0.178 AC. ()Any 5.VEMIO (ABANDONED) 20' «.««..... 10' 20' UTILITY EASEMENT . asi ,'' 11-Z'-g� S 04'06'O 1"" TO BE DEDICATED • di•'�3 +�' O 110 '0 \� ` BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT _ twirl. QD- •� - a/"' S 45'47'55"" E EXISTING UTILITY 300 , 50 0 300 107.47 EASEMENT VOL. 9955, PG. 326 D.R.T.C..T.T. (TO REMAIN) SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT B 20' UTILITY EASEMENT Lire ABANDONMENT HOLLINGSWORTH & BARNETT SURVEY BATE it/o1/9s ABSTRACT NO. 797 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE s SHEET : 1'- ' TARRANT COUNTY CS Carter u Burgess TEXAS Consultants in Engineering.Ard1itedvre. DRAM BY: OBH Planning and theEnvironment 2 OF 2 CARTER & BURGESS, INC. CHECKED BY; GSV 7950 ELIABROOK ORNE.SUITE 250 OILt.AS,TX 75247-4961 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE UTILITY EASEMENT PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY (kr` STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Timarron Land Corporation ("Grantor") for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10) Dollars and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by Grantee herein,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, have granted, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, sell and convey to the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, Grantee herein, of Tarrant County, Texas, a perpetual easement for the purpose of installing, constructing,maintaining,altering,replacing,relocating and operating utility lines in,into,upon, over,across and under that land in Tarrant County,Texas, described as follows,to wit: 20' Utility Easement See attached Exhibit"A"for metes and bounds description. See attached Exhibit"B"for graphic depiction. together with the right of ingress and egress as necessary for the purpose of installing utility lines on the property known and described above. Such easement shall include the right to excavate upon such property,but Grantee shall replace any fence,improvements,or other fixtures upon said property without cost of Grantor,or current owner thereof,and shall restore the property as nearly as possible to its conditions prior to entry thereon. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described easement, together with all and singular, the rights and appurtenances thereto,anywise belonging unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever; and We do hereby certify that We are the owners of the property described herein and bind ourselves, our heirs and assigns, to warrant and to forever defend all and singular the premises unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns,against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim samB or any thereof. Executed this the day of , 1995. By: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated,and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of , 1995. • Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission expires: Executed this the day of , 1995. By: 5 CI ! STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared L , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated,and as the . ,..,. act and deed of said corporation. • GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of , 1995. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission expires: Executed this the day of , 1995. By: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated,and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 1995. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission expires: Approved by the City of Southlake, day of , 1995. By: Mayor, City of Southlake Return to: City Secretary City of Southlake 667 N.Carroll Ave. Southlake,Texas 76092 (NW 5 C rot— (NW EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING AN UTILITY EASEMENT 20' WIDE LYING 10' ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERUNE, SITUATED IN THE BARNETT AND HOWNGSWORTH SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 797, THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED TO TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION(FORMERLY BEAR CREEK COMMUNITIES,INC.),AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 9813, PAGE 2375 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID CENTERUNE BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS N 29°14'06"W A DISTANCE OF 30.39 FEET FROM A 5/8"CAPPED"CARTER&BURGESS"FOUND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TIMARRON ADDITION,GLENDOVER,AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1709, OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING S 85°50'14" E A DISTANCE OF 365.46 FEET FROM AN 5/8"IRON ROD FOUND AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED TO JOE WRIGHT,AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 7303,PAGE 572,OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS, THENCE S 00°10'48"W, A DISTANCE OF 56.39 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE N 89°25'19"W,A DISTANCE OF 214.75 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 03°24'55' E, A DISTANCE OF 263.64 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 09°15'30" E,A DISTANCE OF 344.17 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 15°45'19" E,A DISTANCE OF 300.13 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 00°42'26"W,A DISTANCE OF 233.51 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; (lime ; THENCE S 37°25'23"W, A DISTANCE OF 273`.08 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 51°05'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 262.12 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; • "' THENCE S 29°44'56"W,A DISTANCE OF 291.08 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 03°42'08"E,A DISTANCE OF 316.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT; THENCE S 03°42'08" E, A DISTANCE OF 63.58 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE S 12°38'26"W,A DISTANCE OF 261.85 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER AND THE END OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CENTERUNE AND CONTAINING 0.149 ACRES OF LAND. SHEET 1 OF 2 • FAPROJECTSVDMARROM95206001lSDATA�060EX003.FNS .'1"OF ;t�,, "..C1 ttp-`gip;, GA4 8.VE.DRO e4R cbel - 4114.L)12 L 5 � 92319902D.S11 Le, POINT OF I COMMENCING CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD 5/8'IRF, 365.46 529'1l'06'£ A'dS50'It" µ• 30.39 214.75 - I. 1RF N 89'25'19" W ' S00'1 0'48"W W S 03'24'55" E 56.;9 A 263.64 I 0 TIMARRON ADDITION Z GLENDOVER cr‘ cN CAB. A, SLIDE 1709 O P.R.T.C.T. Z S 09'15'30" E A 344.17 q'QkWA Y TIMARRON ADDITION S 15'45'19"' E STRATHMORE 300.13 \ CAB. A, SLIDE 2395 P.R.T.C.T. I S 00'42'26" W 233.51 I Loy /S37'25'23"W 273.08 S 262.125„ W EXIST/N;UTILITY EASEMENT VOL. 9955, PG. 326 300 150 0 D.R.T.C.T. S 29'4 2914.08'S6" W SCALE IN FEET I S 03'42'08" E POINT OF 316.23 BEGINNING I TIMARRON LAND CORP. ''II S 03'42'08" E 63.58 VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 D.R.T C.T. r`� I S 12'38'26" W 261.85 o ' I TO BE ABANDONED ij 20' 1 BY SEPARATE .__ / 10' 20' EASEMENT OF Tt''•r;. INSTRUMENT '-'. 0.149 AC. �1�P ••� �; EXISTING UTILITY �" q EASEMENT u ...s.......5.7..•....J•.. C VOL. 9955, PG. 326 GAAY 6 VEDRO i; D.R.T.C.T. CD•7 I: `ii 4 EXHIBIT 20' UTILITY(11.0, // Z—9 C HOLLINGSWORTH & BARNETT SURVEY 0.41E: 11/01/95 ABSTRACT NO. 797 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SHEET sue: 1.. ' TARRANT COUNTY Carter Burgess DRAM Br: OgH TEXAS ZnstOtanta nN in EnpineEmerwironrtl.nl d p.Archnewe, nnin9 ana 2 OF 2 CARTER & BURGESS. INC. CHECKED BY: GSV 7950 EIMBROOK ORr .SUl1E 250 DAUAS.TX 75247-4961 ^� 5 c 1 FAJOB\SlD\95206001\GRA\060EX003.0WC City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM (krire November 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Voting for Director of Tarrant Appraisal District The terms of service for the five Directors of the Tarrant Appraisal District will, expire December 31, 1995. Nominations have been received from the voting tax entities for candidates to fill these positions for a two (2) year term beginning January 1, 1996. I have attached an official ballot listing the nominees. There is no provision for write-in candidates. According to the information which was sent to me, the City of Southlake has 19 votes which can be used collectively or separately for the following nominees. I contacted John Marshall, Chief Appraiser, Tarrant Appraisal District and asked for information on each of the candidates and what area the nomination came from. The information I received is attached for your information. It appears that Mac Wilburn was nominated from the Grapevine/HEB area. If you have questions, I will attempt to get you more information. sl 5-d - 1 City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 95-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, DECLARING VOTES FOR THE DIRECTOR OF THE TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the terms of service for the five Directors of the Tarrant Appraisal District will expire on December 31, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the nominations have been received from the voting tax entities for candidates to fill these positions for a two (2) year term beginning January 1, 1996; and, WHEREAS, according to the State Property Tax Code, each voting unit must vote in open meeting, and votes may all be cast for one candidate or they may be distributed among any number of candidates listed on the official ballot; and, WHEREAS, there is no provision for write-in candidates; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT Section 1. All of the above premises are hereby found to be true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City of Southlake has a total of 19 votes and wishes to vote as follows: Section 3. This resolution is effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1995 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: ATTEST: (1.0' , City Secretary 5d-� OFFICIAL BALLOT ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF THE TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT We, the governing body of City of Southlake, having been advised by the Chief Appraiser of Tarrant Appraisal District that we are entitled to cast 19 votes collectively or separately for the following nominees for the Board of Tarrant Appraisal District: Mr. Robert C. Brown, Jr. Mr. Charles Rogers Ms. Ruth Ann McKinney Mr. Joe Sample --------- Mr. Gene Miers Mr. Tommy Vaughn Mr. Joe Potthoff Mr. Mac Wilburn Mr. David Robertson do hereby resolve and order that City of Southlake cast, and does hereby cast, it's votes as follows: votes for votes for (Iire votes for votes for votes for Passed this day of , 1995. Presiding Officer ATTEST , Secretary or Clerk, City of Southlake IMPORTANT: This ballot must be returned by November 15, 1995 to John R. Marshall, Chief Appraiser, Tarrant Appraisal District, 2315 Gravel Road, Fort Worth, Texas, 76118 L MWI'ZI.-'1 1995 ErTY VOTES FOR BOARD 1994 % OF September 14,1995 TAXES IMPOSED TOTAL VOTES TAXING ENTI1Y , . . 1' 1111111P/ - . . - • _SCHOOLS: ' .- *- • -. .•,--. - Arlington $141,831,318 14.48280% 724 Azle 7,136,862 0.72877% 36 Birdville 50 051 957 5.11095% 256 Carrol 15,819,655 1.61539% 81 Castleberry 4,006,754 0.40914% 20 . Crowley 16,595,454 1.69461% 85 Eagle Mountain/Saginaw 15,120,991 1.54405% 77 Everman 6,407,768 0.65432% 33 Fort Worth 161,355,699 16.47649% 824 i Grapevine/Colleyville 59,964,458 6.12314% 306 Hurst/Euless/Bedford 66,149,502 6.75471% 338 Keller 22,498,522 2.29739% 115 Kennedale 4,490,539 0.45854% 23 Lake Worth 2,839,768 0.28998% 14 Mansfield 22,696,563 2.31761% 116 White Settlement 7,294,663 0.74488% 37 'TOTAL SCHOOLS I 604,260,473.00 61.70275% 3,085 _ .. ... Arlington 55,068,877 5.62324% 281 Azle 1,189,823 0.12150% 6 Bedford 6,862,216 0.70072% 35 Benbrook 4,358,927 0.44510% 22 Blue Mound 207,009 0.02114% 1 Colleyville 4,007,339 0.40920% 20 Crowley - 963,807 0.09842% 5 Dalworthington Gardens 319,449 0.03262% 2 Edgecliff Village 305,602 0.03121% 2 Euless 6,166,626 0.62969% 32 Everman 719,815 0.07350% 4 (lble Forrest Hill Worth 126,403,801 12.90745% 646 Grapevine 2,049,482 11,201,857 0.20928% 1.14385% 10 Fort 57 Haltom City 3,391,929 0.34636% 17 Haslet 145,954 0.01490% 1 Hurst 6,354,929 0.64892% 32 Keller 3,516,991 0.35913% 18 Kennedale 812,309 0.08295% 4 Lakeside 96,239 0.00983% 1 Lake Worth ' 504,262 0.05149% 3 Mansfield 4,954,487 0.50592% 25 North Richland Hills 8,768,926 0.89542% 45 Pantego 628,766_ 0.06421% 3 Pelican Bay 84,152 0.00859% 1 Richland Hills 1,033,006 0.10548% 5 River Oaks 827,346 0.08448% 4 Saginaw 1,223,594 0.12494% 6 Sansom Park 242,933 0.02481% 4 Southlake 3,690,846 0.37688% QtreJ2 Watauga 3 277 615 0.33469% 17 Westover Hills 923,835 0.09434% 5 White Settlement .. 1,263,644 0.1 2903% 6 TOTAL CITIES 261,566,393 I 26.70929%1 1,336 OTHER: , 1Tarrant County 113,481,950 11.58796%1 579 TOTAL OTHER 113,481,950 11.58796% 579 TOTALS • $979,308,816 100%! 5,000 (We Page 1 ef'd 6.II Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10 :22 No .009 P.13 (Sir Fort Worth Independent School District Resolution BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Education of the Fort Worth Independent School District that NAME: Mr. Gene Miers ADDRESS: 5608 Maivev, Suite 106 CITY: _Fort Worth STATE: TPXas ZIP CODE: 1f107 , be hereby nominated as the candidate for director to the Tarrant County Tax Appraisal District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Education does hereby certify that the said r Gene Mi -rs _ is currently a resident of the Tax Appraisal District in Tarrant County and has been for at least the past two years. PASSED this 10th day of October, 1995. :` (hoe AYES: 10 NOES: 0 r - Gary J. Manny, President Board of Education Fort Worth Independent School District ATTEST: Theopl us A. Sims Secretary, Board of Education Fort Worth Independent School District F:1bud\wp5 l lBoard\Oct 10.res L 5d- 3� Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10 :23 No .009 P.14 L RESOLUTION NO. 95-667 A RESOLUTION NOMINATING JOE A. POTTHOFF AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE TARRANT COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: I. That the City Council hereby nominates Joe A. Potthoff, 1908 Bonaparte Drive, No. 324, Arlington, Texas 76006, as a candidate for a position on the Board of Directors of the Tarrant County Appraisal District, in accordance with the Property Tax Code of the State of Texas, as amended. II. The Tax Assessor-Collector is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of trassalresolution Di triett Fort Worth hTexasChief Appraiser, Tarrant App (ible PRESENTED AND PASSED on this the 10th day of October 1995, by a vote of 9 ayes and 0 nays at a regular - meeting of the City Council of the City of Arlington, Texas. RICHARD E. GREENE, Mayor ATTEST: p Ci S4retary CINDX K . APPROVED AS TO FORM: JAY DOEGEY, City Attorney ',- BY n L .5- Y , Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23 ,95 10 : 15 No .009 P.02 (kW RESOLUTION 1995-10-2 WHEREAS, the City of Everman taxing entity has determined its preference for the representative to the Appraisal Board. NON, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED, the City of Everman taxing entity does hereby nominate Joe Sample, 212 North Race Street, Everman, Texas 76140, ' as a Member of the Board of Directors for the Tarrant Appraisal District and that a copy of this Resolution be mailed to John Marshall, Chief Appraiser, Tarrant Appraisal District, 2315 Gravel Road, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6982. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th __ day of October, 1995. 17LJ-ig athey Thurston Mayor City of Everman ATTET: /4j911.444/44.P. (44-04-r-) Donna Anderson City Secretary, TRMC City of Everman L i/2 - , Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23 ,95 10 : 15 No .009 P.03 L RESOLUTION NO. 95-920 A RESOLUTION NOMINATING MAC WILBURN AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE TARRANT COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR A TWO-YEAR TERM BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 1996. WHEREAS,the Tarrant Appraisal District is the appraisal district for the City of Euless, Texas, and it has a governing board of directors that are selected by participating political subdivisions; and WHEREAS, the City of Euless is one of these political subdivisions within Tarrant County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Euless. Texas, that Mac Wilburn be nominated for a position on the Board of Directors of the Tarrant Appraisal District for a term of two years beginning January 1, 1996. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 10th day of October, 1995. APPROVED: (kr • ary Li slab, Mayor ATTEST: ..i( (Or-astedisw Su an CrimCMC, City Secretary (kr J'd `I Tarrant .Rppraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10: 15 No .009 P.04 • OC R)1-95 WED 9:54 CITY FT. WORTH rnx rru, tii its11ts140 vc. A Resolution 4,RO q g WHEREAS, the Texas Property Tax Code requires the creation of a tax appraisal district in each county in the State of Texas; and, WHEREAS, the Texas Property Tax Code provides for the nomination and election of directors to the Tarrant Appraisal District Board of Directors; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to nominate candidates for selection as directors of the 'Tarrant Appraisal District of Tarrant County for a term commencing January 1, 1996, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIHE CITY CO OF THE � CITY OF FORT WORTH,that 20441 ' is hereby nominated for a position on the Board of Directs of the Tarrant Appraisal District of Tarrant County. • APPROVED CITY• COUNCIL oci no ' • • elesie.)<1.4444441.441 City Saarat?:y of OA City of Poet Wort it,the,... • rireekuircil7 (110W CITY OF FORT WORTH -9 . Tarrant .Ap raisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10 : 18 No .009 P.05 wtldi-ao r�ru U.ao ti111 r!, wuttth 14RX NU. 8l 18f1814a Y. U3 ' bCT 10 '93 00:32AM tM RIM, ru EXEC OrC P.2/2 Charles Rogers,a native of West Texas,had already been In Fort Worth 20 years when he Joined Wm. Rigg,REALTORS es he president In 19117. He began hie real estate career in the late 1960's as the property manager of the Fort Worth Club Building,but soon he opened his own real estate investment and property management firm. C.W.Rogers Company specialized in the management of high rise office buildings, offering their clients expertise in lease negotiations,project consultation and brokerage. Under Rogers' direction,the company quickly expanded to include a branch devoted to modernization contractors specializing in tenant improvement and the remodeling of older buildings, The company was recognized with several awards for excellence in this field Most notable of these include the N.P.Anderson Building and the Ronald McDonald House. • Rogers has an extensive civic and professional Involvement in the community. He has been a member of or held leadership positions in the Central Area Council of Fort Worth, the Building Owaetrs and Managers Association,and Crime Stoppers. He is currently holding membership in the Fort Worth Champ of Commerce,the Fort Worth Board of Realtors.the Texas Association of Realtors,the National Association of Realtors,and the Building°+rotors end Managers International Association. Rogers currently serves on the boards of the Ronald McDonald House and the Salvation Army. co? He and his wife Mary have one son,Benjamin. • (Nor 6.4—/0 .Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10 : 18 No .009 P.06 1JsOLUTIO WHEREAS,the Arlington Independent School District taxing entity has determined its preference for the representative to the Appraisal Board, NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Arlington Independent School District taxing entity does hereby nominate Tommy Vaughn,2111 River Bend Rd., Arlington,Texas 76014,as a Member of the Board of Directors for the Tarrant Appraisal District and that a copy of this Resolution be mailed to John Marshall, Chief Appraiser, Tarrant Appraisal District, 2315 Gravel Road, Fort Worth, Thxas 76118-6982. L.", PASSED AND APPROVED by the Board of Trustees this 5th Day of October,1995. Carlton Lancaster, President Board of Trustees ATTEST: '01114-"(-)YA Michael Glaspie, Sccre ry Board of Trustees .Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10 : 19 No .009 P.07 • } .0 (kW THE STATE OF TEXAS $ • COUNTY OF TARRANT $ OWIEICALINNI I,R.W.van Tit,City Secretary of the City of River Oaks,Texas,do hereby certify that I am the custodian of the records of the City of River Oaks,Texas,and that the attached is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.478,nominating Robert C.Brown,Jr.,as a candidate for the Tarrant County Appraisal District Board of Directors,as the same appears in the records of this office. In testimony whereat I subscribe my name hereto officially under the corporate seal of the City of River Oaks,this the.LQ day of 1995. L R.W.van Til,City Secretary. City of River Oaks , Tarrant .Rppraisal TEL: Oct 23 ,95 10 : 19 No .009 P.08 • • (bile RESOLUTION NO.478 A RESOLUTION NOMINATING ROBERT C.BROWN,JR., • AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE TARRANT COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVER OAKS,TEXAS: I. • That the City Council hereby nominates Robert C. Brown,Jr., 1025 Lydick Lane,Ft.Worth,TX 76114,as a candidate fora position on the Board of Directors of the Tarrant County Appraisal District,in accordance with the Property Tax Code of the State of Texas,as amended. IL The City Secretary is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to John Marshall,Chief Appraiser,Tarrant Appraisal District,Fort Worth,Texas. (kapY PRESENTED AND PASSED on this the !q day of OG7O,r8 1995,by a vote of ayes and nnays at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of River Oaks,Texas. ` L A ames M.Walker,Mayor ATTEST: • Z?();i212 R.W.van Til,City Secretary • Lie �d-13 . Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10:20 No .009 P.09 AZLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent (kW' 300 ROE STREET • 817-444-3235 AZLE,TEXAS 78020 September 28, 1995 John Marshall,Chief Appraiser Tarrant Appraisal District 2315 Gravel Road Fort Worth,TX 76118 Dear John: Thank you for inviting the Azle Independent School District to submit the name of a candidate to the Board of Directors. The district formally submits the following individual for your consideration: Mr. David Robertson,P.B. 202 Cat Track Road • Weatherford,Texas 76086 (817)598-4442-Home (817)285-0082-Office Le Mr.Robertson is 36 years of age,married,has four children and has been a resident of the Azle I.S.D. for 13 years. Other than time spent away at college,he has resided in the Fort Worth area for his entire life. Mr.Robertson is a professional engineer registered to practice in 43 states. lie received his Bachelor's degree from the University of Texas at Austin and is currently working towards at Master's degree at the University of Texas at Arlington. The Board of Trustees was unanimous in its support of Mr.Robertson's candidacy to your Board. Thank you for your time and consideration of this recommendation. If you need additional information,please feel to contact Mr.Robertson directly. Sincerely, $(-;41 Santo I.Forte Superintendent of Schools attachment r L . Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10 :20 No .009 P.10 RESOLUTION NO. 95-53 WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills desires to nominate a candidate(s)to serve as a member(s)of the Board of Directors of the Tarrant Appraisal District; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of the Board of Directors in providing leadership for the Tarrant Appraisal District; and WHEREAS,the City Council wishes to promote a continued emphasis on fair and uniform appraisals and the efficient operation of the Tarrant Appraisal District; NOW,THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, THAT the following be nominated to serve as a member of the Tarrant Appraisal District Board of Directors: 1. Ruth Ann McKinney 2. Gene Miers 3, Joe Potthoff 4. Tommy Gaughan 5. Mac Wilburn r , PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this the 9th day of October, 1995. APPROVED: To B n, Mayor ATTEST: S-44; • Secretary APPROVE S TO FORM D LEGAL! ' Attorney for the City L , Tarrant .Rppraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10 :21 No .009 P.11 . $EBT BY:Xerox Te l ecopier 7020 ;10-17-05 ; 0:35PM ; H—t—a 1. S. U.4 UOUDO Mt* Z L RESOLTTTION Nomination of candidate for Tarrant Appraisal District Board of Directors Be it resolved by the Board of Trustees of the Hurst-Euless-Bedford Independent School District that the Hurst Euless Bedford Independent School District nominates Mac Wilburn as a candidate for a director's position on the Board of Directors. Tarrant Appraisal District for a term beginning January 1, 1996 to December 30, 1997, Passed and adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Hurst.Euless-Bedford Independent School District at a regular meeting on the 17th day of October, 1995, by a vote of 7 AYES and o NOES, which meeting was duly and legally called and opened to the public as provided by law. ADOPTED: Pre 'dent, card of 10. : •J-s ATTES All Sec • , Board of Trustees L etd -lG ,Tarrant .Appraisal TEL: Oct 23,95 10 :22 No .009 P . 12 10/16/95 13:12 551 7549 CITY OF EVERMAN eomat low (me RSaOLDTION 1995-10-2 WSBIlSad, the City of Evers= taxing entity has determined its preference for the representative to the Appraisal Board. ROM, TSSRsrOU, SS t! RSSOLVSD, the city of Warman taxing entity does hereby nominate Joe Sample, 212 North Race Street, Dworman, Texas 76140, ' aA a Member of the Board of Directors for the Tarrant Appraisal District and that a copy of this Resolution be milled to John Marshall, Chief appraiser, Tarrant Appraisal District, 2315 Gravel Road, Port Worth, Texas 7 118-6982. MUSS IWD APPROVED this lf1,1k day of October, 1995. (11m, eli � Cat b Thurs on Mayor City of Warman ATTESTS Donna nnnerson City Secretary, TRMC City of Everman L Set -/7 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Interlocal Agreement between City of Southlake and City of Plano for Assistance in Building Plans Examination The City of Plano Plan Review Staff provides a plan review service to other cities. To promote efficient and effective service in the plan review process, the City of Southlake's Building Department has requested assistance with commercial construction plan reviews by utilizing this service offered by Plano's Plan Review Staff. It was found that Plano is the only city that provides this service. A second alternative is the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) in Austin, Tx., which has a plan review cost structure (see attached). For a commercial building permit fee of$5,292.75, ICBO would charge $1,984.79 ($5,292.75 X 50%=$2,646.38 and $2,646.38 X 75% =1984.79) for the plan review service. Plano average would be $200 to $250 for each review. Utilizing ICBO would not only cost more, but also sending plans to Austin would take longer. An Interlocal Agreement between the City of Southlake and City of Plano is attached. Southlake City Attorney has reviewed this agreement, and amendments were made based upon his comments. The agreement states the following: • Plano will provide the plan review service at $25.00 an hour (plans review time averages eight to ten hours per set of plans). • Plano will apply the 1994 edition of the Uniform Building Code, with Appendix, and any amendment to said Code by Southlake. • The building plans examination will include review of building materials, exit requirements and occupancy issues. It will not include structural review, any engineering calculation or framing requirements, zoning, or on-site inspections. • Southlake is responsible for pickup and delivery of said plans. • Southlake will pay for services within thirty (30) days from receipt of invoice. • The Interlocal agreement shall be valid beginning August 1, 1995 to and through September 30, 1996. The agreement may be renewed each year by both parties commencing on October 1. L (wee Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Interlocal Agreement Between Southlake and Plano October 31, 1995 Page 2. In anticipation of the need for assistance with commercial construction plans review, the Building Department budgeted funds for this purpose. Please place this on the November 7, 1995 agenda for Council consideration. BW/sm Attachments: ICBO Fee (kw Plano Interlocal Agreement E- GI CT 30 '95 17:33 ARO - IC a) 51a%343-9i16 P.1/2 ICBO FAX International Conference of Building Officials 9300 Jollyvifle Road, Suite 101 • Austin, Texas 78759-7455 PHONE (512) 794-8700 FAX (512) 343-9116 AUSTIN. REGIONAL OFFICE DATE; October 30, 1995 TIME: 4:20 TO: Chuck Bloomberg City of South Lake FAX NUMBER: 1-817-488-5097 Ce FROM: . Carroll Lee Pruitt OPERATOR: Glenice Beenders TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 2 if you do not receive all pages, please call (512) 794-8700 and ask to speak to the operator named above. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/MESSAGE: • • • • • L -CCT 3a '95 17:33 FIRO - ICE* 512.-343-9116 P-2/2 Le Fees for ICRE) plan review are as follows: . (l) Uniform Euildina Code Review a. Complete (both nonstructural and structural) - 50% of permit fee shown in • Table No: 3-A* / A -0494 uoC, -.Ja. Na-y b. Nonstructural Only 75% of the complete review fee c. Structural Only - 85% of the complete review fee (2) Uniform Mechanical Code Review 20%of permit fee set forth in Section 304(b) of the Uniform Administrative Code** (3) Uui form PlambinE Code Review • 20% of permit fee set forth in Section 304(b) of the Uniform Administrative Code** • . (4) National Electrical Code Review - i Lir 20% of permit fee set forth in Section 304(b) of the Uniform Administrative Code** * Section 304(c) prescribes a plan.review fee equal to 65% of the building permit fee . ** The permit fee is determined as part of the review • tiro' INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AND CITY OF PLANO FOR ASSISTANCE IN BUILDING PLANS EXAMINATION THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF COLLIN § COUNTY OF TARRANT § THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 1995, by and between the CITIES OF PLANO AND SOUTHLAKE,hereafter referred to as "Plano" and"Southlake" respectively,each of which are Texas municipal corporations; WHEREAS, this Agreement is being entered into pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act,V.T.C.A.,Government Code, Chapter 791 (the"Act");and WHEREAS, Plano and Southlake are both local governments as defined by the Act engaged in the provision of governmental services to their respective citizens, including the providing of administrative functions which encompass building plans examinations;and WHEREAS, these services serve the public health and welfare, promote efficiency and effectiveness of local governments, and are of mutual concern to the contracting parties; and WHEREAS, Plano has staff which perform building plans examination and Southlake has a need for such services; and C Interlocal Agreement Between City of Southlake and City of Plano for Assistance in Building Plans Examination-Page 1 u-SOUTH(10n6/95) C WHEREAS, Plano and Southlake desire to secure for each the benefits of the administrative functions of building plans examination. WITNESSETH: NOW,THEREFORE,IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Upon the request of the Southlake City Manager, or his/her designee, to Plano's Building Official,the Building Official, agrees to provide the services of building plans examination,upon the following conditions: a. Such services will be provided by the Building Official's staff on an "as available" basis at a cost to Southlake of$25.00 per hour. The Building Official reserves the right to delegate the services within his staff as he deems appropriate. b. The plans to be examined will be delivered by Southlake to the Building Inspection Department located at 1520 Avenue K, Suite 140, Plano, Texas 75075. c. Plano city staff will perform building plans examination for Southlake applying the requirements of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Building Code,with Appendix,and any amendments to said Code by Southlake. A copy of any such amendments must be furnished to the Building Official of the City of • Plano prior to any such examination. d. The building plans examination will include review of building materials, exit requirements and occupancy issues. The building plans examination will not include structural review, any calculation of engineering or framing requirements,zoning,or on-site inspections. Southlake agrees the services provided are merely an advisory function for („„., its benefit. `` �6b Interlocal Agreement Between City of Southlake and City of Plano for Assistance in Building Plans Examination-Page 2 IAsovrH(lon6/95) • • (noil 2. Upon completion of the building plans examination by Plano staff, a written report and the plans examined will be returned to the Southlake City Manager, or his/her designee, along with an invoice for said services. Southlake shall be responsible to pick up plans when complete. 3. Southlake agrees to pay for said services within thirty(30)days of receipt of the invoice. Those payments will be made from current revenues available to Southlake. 4. Each entity waives all claims against the other entity for compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury, or death occurring as a consequence of the performance of this Agreement. Provided, however, that this waiver shall not apply in those cases in which the claim results from the failure of the requesting entity to accept responsibility for any civil liability for which the requesting entity is responsible as determined and required by the Act,and as it may be amended in the future. 5. This Agreement contains all commitments and agreements of the parties hereto in connection with building plans examination, and no other oral or written commitments shall have any force or effect if not contained herein. 6. In case one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be for any reason held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions thereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 7. In order to facilitate execution, each party hereto may execute a duplicate original. 8. The term of this agreement shall be for the period beginning August 1, 1995 to and through September 30, 1996. Thereafter, this Agreement may be renewed ,5-E. 7 Interiocal Agreement Between City of Southlake and City of Plano for Assistance in Building Plans Examination-Page 3 IAsourH(I0/16/95) C for successive additional one (1) year terms commencing on October 1 of each year and after approval by both parties, unless terminated by either Plano or Southlake as set forth below. EXECUTED by the Cities of Plano and Southlake, each respective governmental entity acting by and through its City Manager or other duly authorized official as required by law,on the date hereinbelow specified. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,a Home Rule Municipal Corporation By: CURTIS HAWK City Manager Date: ATTEST: City Secretary CITY OF PLANO,TEXAS,a Home Rule Municipal Corporation By: THOMAS IL MUEHLENBECK City Manager Date: ATTEST: Jackie Blakely,CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: (.91 Gary F. Chatham,CITY ATTORNEY Interlocal Agreement Between City of Southlake and City of Plano for Assistance in Building Plans Examination-Page 4 . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared CURTIS HAWK,City Manager of the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS,a home-rule municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN under my hand and seal of office this the day of 105. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF COLLIN ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority on this day personally appeared THOMAS H. MUEHLENBECK, City Manager of the CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS, a home-rule municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of the CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS, for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN under my hand and seal of office this the day of , 1995. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas 7 Interlocal Agreement Between City of Southiake and City of Plano for Assistance in Building Plans Examination-Page 5 IA.SOUrH(10116/95) 1 City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM October 27, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Interlocal Cooperation Agreement For Fire Protection Service With Denton County Attached is the Annual Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for fire protection service within a specific district in Denton County. The district that they are asking us to serve is the portion of Denton County that is the northwestern area of T.W. King and Corp property to the east of T.W. King that is not in the city limits of Southiake. The contract provides that the County agrees to pay the City for the full performance of this agreement the sum of $5,000 upon execution of this agreement, and $100 per fire call in the designated unincorporated areas of Denton County. The contract provides for Denton County to engage in fire service in our City when we call for their aid and we will provide fire service in their areas when needed. It allows for the Denton County Fire Marshal to respond and assist when needed with the City providing reciprocal assistance. The contract also provides that the County of Denton will supply the City with an 800 MHz radio for contact and we will have utilization of that radio during the duration of the contract. The contract provides a termination agreement of 60 days written notice from either party, and it provides that the City and County agree to accept responsibility for their own acts, negligence or omissions of the officers, employees and agents, and that neither the City or County weigh any immunities or defense that would otherwise be available to each against claims arising from the exercise of government powers and functions. The effective date will be October 1995 and will extend through September 30, 1996. We annually enter into this contract with Denton County and previously this contract has not placed any burden upon our abilities to provide service either to our citizens, or to the particular district as mentioned in the contract. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the contract and we advise ratification of this contract. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. /6:C BC/bls L 5F-1 THE STATE OF TEXASLI, COUNTY OF DENTON INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES • THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of, , 1995, by and between DENTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and the CITY OF SOUTHLAKE " , a municipal corporation located in Denton COUNTY, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "CITY. " WHEREAS, COUNTY is a duly organized political subdivision of the State of Texas engaged in the administration of COUNTY government and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton COUNTY; and WHEREAS, CITY is a municipal corporation, duly organized and operating under the laws of the State of Texas and is engaged in the provision of fire protection service and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton COUNTY; and WHEREAS, CITY is the owner and operator of certain fire protection vehicles and other equipment designed for the extinguishing of fire and prevention of damage to property and injury to persons from fire and has in its employ trained personnel whose duties are related to the use of such vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY mutually desire to be subject to the provisions of V.T.C.A. Government Code, Chapter 791, the C SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1995.96 1 Interlocal Cooperative Act and Sections 352 .001 and 352 .004 Local Government Code and contract pursuant thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, COUNTY AND CITY, for the mutual consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows: I. The effective date of this agreement shall be the 1st day of October, 1995 . The term of this agreement shall be for the period of October 1, 1995 to and through September 30, 1996. II. --Services to be rendered hereunder by CITY are fire protection services normally rendered within the CITY Fire Department as hereinafter defined, to citizens of COUNTY, to wit: A. Availability and provision of emergency fire prevention, extinguishment, safety and rescue services within the agreed or specified territory or jurisdiction of the CITY Fire Department; said services to be rendered as described herein by said Department in all unincorporated areas within the above referenced operating territory or jurisdiction of such Department, the referenced services as set out herein are rendered by said Department in consideration of the basic funding referenced elsewhere herein and the per-call fee set out elsewhere herein, for the common good and benefit and to serve the public convenience and necessity of the citizens of Denton COUNTY who are not otherwise protected with respect to fire prevention, extinguishment, safety, and rescue services. B. The CITY Fire Department shall respond to requests for IL, fire protection services made within COUNTY as set out in Exhibit SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1995-96 2 5.F-3 ci "A" attached hereto designated area 23 and incorporated by reference. C. The COUNTY agrees that in the event a fire in the CITY' s unincorporated designated area which the CITY considers to be of incendiary nature and upon request by the CITY, the COUNTY Fire Marshal will dispatch investigation personnel to the fire scene within a response time sufficient to legally maintain and protect all evidence of said fire and will conduct all appropriate investigation and prosecution of arsonists. - -D. It is further agreed that the CITY shall not be responsible for investigations of suspected incendiary fires in rural area, but shall cooperate with the COUNTY Fire Marshal in immediately relating all pertinent information possible to the investigator(s) . E. It is further agreed that the COUNTY Fire Marshal may assist in the conduct of appropriate investigations of a fire which the CITY considers to be of incendiary nature in the CITY' s incorporated designated area upon request by the CITY.' F. It is further agreed that the CITY shall submit monthly statements on the Texas Fire Incident Reporting System' s standardized forms to the Denton COUNTY Fire Marshal, 110 West Hickory, Denton, Texas 76201. This form will serve as the billing statement to the COUNTY for reimbursement of calls made in the unincorporated designated area. G. It is further agreed that Denton COUNTY Fire Marshal shall provide the forms upon request from the CITY. (Irol SOUTHLAKE ARE CONTRACT 1995-96 3 5F-14 (1m, H. It is recognized that the officers and employees of CITY' s Fire Department have duties and responsibilities which include the rendition of fire protection services, and it shall be the responsibility and within the sole discretion of the officers and employees of said Fire Department to determine priorities in the dispatching and use of such equipment and personnel, and the judgment of any such officer or employee as to any such matter shall be the final determination. III. .._,The COUNTY shall designate the COUNTY Judge to act on behalf of COUNTY and to serve as "Liaison Officer" between COUNTY and CITY. The COUNTY Judge or his designated substitute shall insure the performance of all duties and obligations of COUNTY herein IL, stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of COUNTY in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and provide supervision of COUNTY'S employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of COUNTY and CITY. IV. CITY shall ensure the performance of all . duties and obligations of CITY as hereinafter stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of CITY in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and shall provide immediate and direct supervision of the CITY 1:10, employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors and/or laborers, SOUTHLAKE ARE CONTRACT 1995.96 4 5F- 5 if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of CITY and COUNTY. V. For the services hereinabove stated, COUNTY agrees to pay to CITY for the full performance of this agreement the sum of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5, 000.00) upon execution of this agreement and the sum of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) per fire call in the designated unincorporated areas of Denton COUNTY, Texas. No payment will be made for service provided outside the service district whether by mutual aid agreement or otherwise. CITY understands and agrees that payment by COUNTY to the CITY shall be made in accordance with the normal and customary processes and business procedures of COUNTY, and in conformance with applicable IL, state law. COUNTY agrees to provide to CITY an STX 800 Mhz radio for the use of CITY in carrying out the terms of this contract. This radio will remain the property of the COUNTY and will be returned on termination of this agreement. COUNTY will bear the risk of loss or destruction and make necessary repairs so long as CITY uses the property in a reasonable manner for the purposes of this contact. COUNTY reserves the right to reclaim the property at any time for any reason. It is agreed by COUNTY and CITY that the radio was provided for in previous contracts between COUNTY and CITY. No agreement has been made for an additional radio. VI. 4:., SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1995.96 5 cF-4 COUNTY agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, negligence, and/or omissions of all COUNTY' S officers, employees, and agents while with in its COUNTY limits. VII. COUNTY and CITY understand and agree that liability under this contract is governed by V.T.C.A. Government Code Chapter 791 and V.T.C.A. Local Government Code Section 352 . 001 and 352.004. This agreement is made in contemplation of the applicability of these laws to the agreement. Insofar as legally possible COUNTY and_.CITY agree to be bound by the above mentioned statutes as they exist as of the date of this agreement. VIII. In the event of any default in any of the covenants herein liribp, contained, this agreement may be forfeited and terminated at either party's discretion if such default continues for a period of ten (10) days after notice to the other party in writing of such default and intention to declare this agreement terminated. Unless the default is cured as aforesaid, this agreement shall terminate as if that were the day originally fixed herein for the expiration of the agreement. IX. This agreement may be terminated any time, by either party giving sixty (60) days advance written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination by either party, CITY shall be compensated pro rata for all services performed to termination date, together with reimbursable expenses then due and as IL/ authorized by this agreement. In the event of such termination, SOUTHLAKE ARE CONTRACT 1995-96 6 5F- 7 Co/ should CITY be overcompensated on a pro rata basis for all services performed to termination date, and/or be overcompensated reimbursable expenses as authorized by this Agreement, then COUNTY shall be reimbursed pro rata for all such overcompensation. Acceptance of such reimbursement shall not constitute a waiver of any claim that may otherwise arise out of this agreement. X. The fact that COUNTY and CITY accept certain responsibilities relating to the rendition of fire protection services under this agreement as a part of their responsibility for providing protection for the public health makes it imperative that the performance of these vital services be recognized as a governmental function and that the doctrine of governmental immunity shall be and it is hereby invoked to the extent possible under the law. Neither CITY nor COUNTY waives nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising from the exercise of government powers and functions. XI. This agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between CITY and COUNTY and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements, either written or oral. This agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both CITY and COUNTY. CP' SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1995-96 7 J r--U XII. 4L, This agreement and any of its terms and provision, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. XIII. In the event that any portion of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. XIV. The undersigned officer and/or agents of the parties hereto are the property authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the parties 4riorm, hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. XV. Acceptance of this contract constitutes approval of the service area set out in exhibit "A" attached hereto. SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1995-96 8 F� EXECUTED in duplicate originals, this the day of (11., , 1995. COUNTY CITY DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 110 WEST HICKORY 667 NORTH CARROLL BLVD. DENTON, TEXAS 76201 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 By By Jeff Moseley Title Denton COUNTY Judge Acting on behalf of and by Acting on behalf of and by the the authority of DENTON COUNTY authority of the THE CITY Commissioners Court of OF SOUTHLAKE Denton COUNTY, Texas. ATTEST: ATTEST: BY: BY: Tim Hodges Secretary Denton COUNTY Clerk C APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Assistant District Attorney Fire Chief APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Denton COUNTY Fire Marshal SOUTHLAKE ARE CONTRACT 1995-96 9 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM October 27, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for Ambulance Service With Denton County Attached is the Annual Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for ambulance service within a specific district in Denton County. The district that they are asking us to serve is the portion of Denton County that is the northwestern area of T.W. King and Corp property to the east of T.W. King that is not in the city limits of Southlake. The contract provides a termination agreement of 60 days written notice from either party, provides definitions, states that the City will provide this service when called in those areas, and that Denton County will pay a start up fee of$1432 and that there may be other collectible fees when runs are made. The contract also provides that the City and County agree to accept responsibility for their own acts, negligence or omissions of the officers, employees and agents, and that neither the City or County weigh any immunities or defense that would otherwise be available to each against claims arising from the exercise of government powers and functions. The effective date will be October 1995 and will extend through September 30, 1996. We annually enter into this contract with Denton County and previously this contract has not placed any burden upon our abilities to provide service either to our citizens, or to the particular district as mentioned in the contract. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the contract and we advise ratification of this contract. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. BC/bls (11..? sG — � THE STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) JNTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT AMBULANCE SERVICE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1995, by and between DENTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "County" and the "CITY OF SOUTHLAKE", a municipality located in Denton and Tarrant County,Texas,hereinafter referred to as "City." WHEREAS,County is a duly organized political subdivision of the State of Texas engaged in the administration of county government and related services for the benefit of the citizens ; and WHEREAS, City is a municipality engaged in the provision of ambulance service and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton County; and WHEREAS, City is an owner and operator of certain ambulance vehicles and other (100, equipment designed for the transportation of persons who are sick,infirm,or injured and has in its employ such trained personnel whose duties are related to the use of such vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS, County desires to obtain emergency medical services rendered by City, as more fully hereinafter described for the benefit of the residents of Denton County,Texas; and WHEREAS, the provision of emergency medical services is a governmental function that serves the public health and welfare and is of mutual concern to the contracting parties; and WHEREAS,County and City mutually desire to be subject to the provisions of V.T.C.A. Government Code, Chapter 791, the Interlocal Cooperative Act, V.T.C.A. Health and Safety Code,Section 774.003 and other applicable statutes and contracts pursuant thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, County and City for the mutual consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows: The effective date of this agreement shall be the 1st day of October, 1995. XNTERLO AL AMMAN= AORZEMENT _ Oil! COUNTY - CITY OF ICUTHLAZE SG-� . II. The term of this agreement shall be for the period of October 1, 1995 to and d through September 30, 1996. Each party may terminate this agreement by giving the other party written notice of intent to terminate sixty(60)days after receipt of such notice. III. As used herein, the words and phrases hereinafter set forth shall have the meanings as follows: A. "Emergency"shall mean any circumstance that calls for immediate action and in which the element of time in transporting the sick,wounded or injured for medical treatment is essential to the health or life of a person or persons. Whether the aforementioned circumstances in fact exist is solely up to the discretion of the City. For dispatch purposes only, "emergency" shall include, but not be limited to: 1. The representation by a person requesting ambulance service that an immediate need ci exists for such service for the purpose of transporting a person from any location to a place of treatment and emergency medical treatment is thereafter administered;and 2. The representation by a person requesting ambulance service that an immediate need exists for such service for the purpose of transporting a person from any location to the closest medical facility; B. "Rural area" means any area within the boundaries of Denton County, Texas, and without the corporate limits of all incorporated cities,towns and villages within said County. C. "Urban area" means any area within said County, within the corporate limits of an incorporated city,town or village. D. "Emergency ambulance call" means a response to a request for ambulance service by the personnel of City in a situation involving an emergency (as such word is hereinabove defined) through the instrumentality of an ambulance vehicle. Within the meaning hereof, a single call might involve the transportation of more than one person at a time. (...., XITIR!AcaL aVmULANas AGREZEIENT . DIMITOMY COMET - CXTT O: BOUT iI i 5G-3 CIV.A. Services to be rendered hereunder by City are ambulance services normally rendered by City under circumstances of emergency as hereinabove defined to citizens of County. B. THE SOUTHLAKE Ambulance Department shall respond to the requests for ambulance services made within designated area 13 of County, as set out in exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference. C. It is recognized that the officers and employees of City have duties and responsibilities which include the rendering of ambulance services and it shall be the responsibility and within the sole discretion of the officers and employees of City to determine priorities in the dispatching and use of such equipment and personnel and the judgment of any such officer or employee as to any such matter shall be the final determination. V. The County shall designate the County Judge to act on behalf of County and to serve as "Liaison Officer" between County and City. The County Judge or his designated substitute shall insure the performance of all duties and obligations of County herein stated, devote sufficient time g and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of County in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and provide supervision of County's employees, agents, contractors,sub—contractors and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of County and City. VI. City shall ensure the performance of all duties and obligations of City as hereinafter stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of City in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and shall provide immediate and direct supervision of the City employees,agents,contractors,sub—contractors and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of City and County. C srrrsRrocu armvr+r►rres aazemIENr morrow couirr: - ern. or sours» sG -� VII. For the services hereinabove stated, County agrees to pay Provider a fee of $1,432.00 based on a funding formula as follows: First, the readiness sum is .816 per capita based on population, for a maximum of$269.00. Second, a sum of $407.88 per ambulance run will be paid, for a maximum of$0.00. This sum is based upon the number of runs made by Provider in fiscal year 1995. Third, a fixed sum will be paid based on size of covered rural area, for a maximum of$1,025.00. Payments will be paid quarterly,commencing on October 1, 1995. The remaining payments shall be made respectively on or before January 1, 1996, April 1, 1996, and July 1, 1996. The population and mileage figures used were obtained from North Central Texas Council of Governments. An ambulance call is defined as the actual treatment and transport of a patienrto a medical facility. If the patient is not transported, there would be no ambulance call according to this agreement. The Provider transporting the patient shall receive payment regardless of the service delivery area in which the call originated. The City shall submit all requests for payment using a standardized ambulance (...., transportation reporting foam ved and provided by the County. The form shall be submitted Po approved within five (5) days of performance by the Provider. Reporting forms shall be completed in full and contain accurate patient information. Forms may be submitted by personal delivery, U.S. mail,facsimile, or computer telephone link. Completed forms shall be submitted to the office of the Denton County Fire Marshall. VIII. County agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts,negligence and/or omissions of .all County's officers,employees and agents. IX. • City agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts,negligence and/or omissions of all City's officers,employees and agents. c INTIRLOCAT. AMM AN = aORsomrr =TONY COUNTY - CITY Of aoCTm&II 5G- S X. (sr, In the event of any default in any of the covenants herein contained, this agreement may be forfeited and terminated at either party's discretion if such default continues for a period of ten (10) days after notice to the other party in writing of such default and intention to declare this agreement terminated. Unless the default is cured as aforesaid, this agreement shall terminate as if that were the day originally fixed herein for the expiration of the agreement. XI. This agreement may be terminated at any time by either party giving sixty (60) days advance notice to the other party. In the event of such termination by either party, City shall be compensated pro rata for all services performed to termination date, together with reimbursable expenses then due and as authorized by this agreement. In the event of such termination, should City be overcompensated on a pro rate basis for all services performed to termination date and/or be overcompensated reimbursable expenses as authorized by this agreement, then County shall be reimbursed pro rata for all such overcompensation. Acceptance of such reimbursement shall not constitute a waiver of any claim that may otherwise arise out of this agreement. XII. The fact that County and City accept certain responsibilities relating to the rendering of ambulance services under this agreement as a part of their responsibility for providing protection for the public health makes it imperative that the performance of these vital services be recognized as a governmental function and that the doctrine of governmental immunity shall be, and it is hereby, invoked to the extent possible under the law. Neither City nor County waives nor shall be deemed hereby to waive any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising from the exercise of governmental powers and functions. XIII. This agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and County and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements, either written or oral. This (../ agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties. IMTXRLOC11L al0 M N= AORRIZINT DUNTOQR Covent - CITY or aourmaxm 5G XIV. This agreement and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereto,shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. XV. In the event that any portion of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. XVI. The undersigned officer and/or agents of the parties hereto are the properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the parties hereto and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extended said authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. (11 • znrra ocu ariBULANCli NORIMMUNIT DE Y CooaTY - CITY or sovrm►r • EXECUTED in duplicate originals,this the day of , 1995. (10/ COUNTY CITY DENTON COUNTY,TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 110 WEST HICKORY 667 NORTH CARROLL DENTON,TEXAS 76201 SOUTHLAKE,TX 76092 By By Jeff Moseley City Manager Denton County Judge Acting on behalf of and by Acting on behalf of and by the authority of DENTON COUNTY the authority of the City of Commissioners Court of SOUTHLAKE,Texas Denton County,Texas. ATTEST: ATTEST: BY: BY: Tim Hodges City Secretary Denton County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: (...„ Assistant District Attorney Fire Chief • APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Denton County Fire Marshall C INTsuAG1L A1mULANCs AORZEIMHNT E ?ONY COMITY - CITY OW BOOTN&A 5G -8" • City of Southlake,Texas r MEMORANDUM November 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Agreement for Automatic Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services Attached is a mutual aid agreement between the City of Southlake and the City of Grapevine for mutual aide in fire protection and EMS service. This is an annual contract that provides for each city to respond when requested for fire and ambulance service to the respective city. Through the years this agreement has been established for the benefit to both cities and this type of agreement is common to cities throughout the United States. Southlake is currently involved in other mutual aid agreements in all contiguous cities and counties. This contract has the usual indemnity and termination clauses. The original has already been signed by the City of Grapevine and we request that this workable agreement be continued. I am available for any comments or questions you might have. BC/bls Attachment 4 P (114/ AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 19 , by and between the cities of Grapevine and Southlake, Texas, all being municipal corporations chartered under the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas, each acting through its authorized representatives. WHEREAS, the cities of Grapevine and Southlake desire to enter into an agreement for the automatic provision of fire protection and emergency medical services; and - WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into pursuant to Subchapter A, Chapter 791, Texas Government code; NOW THEREFORE, It is agreed as follows: I. (I MUTUAL ASSISTANCE (a) Upon the request of the Fire Chief or his designee of one city to the fire department of the other city to respond to a fire and/or medical emergency within the city limits of the requesting city, the responding city will respond with available firefighting and emergency medical services equipment and personnel in aid of the requesting city to any point within a reasonable distance of the city limits of the responding city. (b) Thq Fire Chief of each city will designate the area outside their respective city's limits which is within a reasonable distance. (c) If conditions exist within the responding city that prevent response outside its city limits, the Fire Chief or his designee shall immediately notify the fire department of the requesting city that no response can be made. II. PROCEDURES A dispatch of firefighting and emergency medical services equipment and personnel pursuant to this agreement is subject to cH-2 the following procedures: (1) A request for aid shall specify the location by street address with Mapsco number to which the equipment and personnel are to be dispatched. (2) The responding city shall respond to the specified location and initiate action to mitigate the emergency or provide backup coverage only if requested. (3) A responding city shall be released from service by the requesting city when the services of the responding city are no longer required. Responding city reserves the right to release itself when it determines its services are required in an emergency within its own city. III. COMMON CITY LIMITS In areas where common city limit lines exist, accurate determination of jurisdiction may not be possible upon receipt of an alarm. In these cases, the city receiving the alarm will dispatch its firefighting or emergency medical services equipment Cand personnel and notify the city of the alarm. If the emergency ' is not within the city limits of the respondintg city,o ave bitnis sragreed ed that the services provided will be considered pursuant to this Agreement. Iv. CLAIMS Each city waives all claims against the other for compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury or death occurring as a consequence of the performance of this agreement. However, this waiver shall not apply in those cases in which a claim results from the failure of the requesting city to accept responsibility required by Section 791.006, Texas Government Code. V. COSTS The responding city shall not be reimbursed by the requesting city for costs incurred in responding to an emergency pursuant to this agreement. Personnel who perform duties pursuant injury agreement shall receive the same wage, salary, p in ury oro death benefits, worker's compensation benefits, payment f expenses, and all other compensation and rights for the performance ofthose dutles, as sery service ofethe city by which they are employed.y would have received for regular Each duu ties in the SH-3 city shall be solely responsible for the payment of its costs associated with providing firefighting or emergency medical services equipment and personnel under this agreement. VI. SUPERVISION The equipment and personnel of a responding city shall be under the control and supervision of employees of the responding city during a response pursuant to this agreement. VII. LIABILITY In accordance with Interlocal Cooperation Act, Vernons Texas Civil Statues, Art. 4413 (32c) Sec. 4 (g) , when governmental units enter a contract or agreement for the furnishing of fire protection services, any civil liability related to the furnishing of those services is the responsibility of the governmental unit which would be responsible for furnishing the services absent the contract or agreement. VIII. TERMINATION AND REMOVAL Each city has the right to terminate its participation in this agreement with ninety (90) days' written notice to the other city. Ix. PRIOR COMMITMENTS This agreement contains all commitments and agreements between the two cities regarding automatic fire protection and emergency medical services, and no other prior oral or written commitments shall have any force or effect. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, it is understood that certain signatory cities may have contracted or may contract in the future with each other for total fire protection services or emergency medical services, and it is agreed that this agreement shall not affect those contracts. X. VENUE Each party agrees that if legal action is brought under this agreement, exclusive venue shall lie in Tarrant, Dallas, and Denton Counties, Texas. C 5rl - r XI. (r; BENEFITS When an employee or volunteer of the responding city is performing duties under the terms of this agreement, that person is considered to be acting in the line of duty for the purposes of 42 U.S.C.A. , Section 3796; is considered to be in performance of duties within the provisions of Article 6228f, V.T.C.S. , and Chapter 142, Texas Local Government Code; and shall be entitled to any other benefits which accrue under law as a result of injury, death, or loss which occurs while in the line of duty. XII. SEVERABILITY In case one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall be for any reason held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unengorceability shall not affect any other provision, and this agreement shall be construed as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained in the agreement. XIII. AUTHORIZATION This agreement is made pursuant to Chapter 791 and Subchapter E, Chapter 418, Texas Government Code. It is agreed that in the execution of this agreement, no party waives any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it, against claims arising from the exercise of governmental powers and functions. EXECUTED this day of , 19 , at Tarrant County, Texas. CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS BY: BY: CITY MANAGER FIRE CHIEF BY: CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS IL, BY: BY: CITY MANAGER FIRE CHIEF BY: CITY ATTORNEY 5 H- 5 City of Southlake,Texas Coe MEMORANDUM November 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim McAdams, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Consider SYBA Facility Utilization Agreement In accordance with the city's Park Use Policy, an organization wanting to use city or joint-use facilities must enter into a facility utilization agreement with the city. Attached is a draft agreement between the Southlake Youth Basketball Association and the City of Southlake for the SYBA to run a basketball league for grades 3 to 6 at the two Middle School gyms and the Intermediate School Um. The SYBA has agreed to purchase a one million dollar insurance policy. The principals at the Intermediate and Middle Schools have confirmed the dates and conditions outlined. The Parks and Recreation Board approved this agreement Monday, October 9. The City Council (610, needs to consider this agreement at their next meeting. Please call me at 481-5581 extension 757, if you have any questions. KM '51 I FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT The parties to this agreement are the City of Southlake, Texas herein called "City", and the Southlake Youth Basketball Association,herein called "SYBA". FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual undertakings herein set out, the parties agree as follows: I. PREMISES City agrees to provide gyms and practice time as defined by Exhibit`B", SYBA Gym Requirements. Gym requirements and dates for the season shall be provided by SYBA to City at least 90 days prior to opening day of the season. Facilities in Exhibit `B" are herein called "Premises" in accordance with the terms of this agreement. II. SEASON AND HOURS The season of this agreement shall be annually on the days of Monday through Saturday, with each facility usage to not begin before 4:00pm on weekdays or 8:00am on Saturdays. Exhibit`B", SYBA Gym Requirements, is approximate dates for significant activities. III. RENEWAL OR TERMINATION This agreement must be renewed on an annual basis on November 1 of each year, with SYBA having the right of first refusal to enter into a new agreement. Changes in the agreement must be requested 90 days prior to the renewal date by either party. Written notification by the City must be provided to the City Manager, City of Southlake at City Hall. In the event SYBA terminates this agreement, SYBA will remove its own movable equipment which is not of a permanent nature upon non-renewal of this agreement within thirty(30) days. IV. FEES AND ASSIGNMENT SYBA shall not charge any fees for admission without prior approval of the Parks and Recreation Board for any event. (Example: approved tournaments) SYBA reserves the right to request a voluntary donation for admission to events other than regularly scheduled league games. SYBA agrees to provide signs clearly indicating donations are requested only for the SYBA activity occurring on Premises. Access to other Premises activities shall be clearly available. SYBA shall not assign this agreement nor shall it rent out any property of the City without prior written consent of the City. Col Rev.Date 10/2/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT Print Date 10/16/95 SOUTI IIAKE YOUTH BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION V. UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES SYBA shall not engage in any activities on the premises which are in violation of any existing state, federal, local law or use the premises in such a manner as to constitute any hindrance for other park patrons engaged in lawful activities. VI. PERMISSION FOR INSTALLATION OR CONSTRUCTION SYBA,in accordance with the City's Donation Policy shall submit to the Parks and Recreation Board for approval to install or construct temporary or permanent structures, signs, equipment, or other related items. Permanent structures shall become the property of the School. SYBA is allowed a maximum of two (2) portable signs listing SYBA sponsors for the current and previous year. VII. INDEMNITY SYBA shall indemnify and hold harmless the City of Southlake, its agents, officials and employees and a umpire or official,from any and all claims for bodily injury, illness, death, personal injury or property damage arising out of the activities of insofar as permitted by law, the City of Southlake shall indemnify and hold harmless the Southlake Youth Basketball Association, its agents,officials, and employees and any umpire or official from any and all claims for bodily injury, illness, death, personal injury or property damage arising out of the negligence of its officers, agents, servants or co„ employees. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit or waive any governmental or sovereign immunity of the City of Southlake or any immunities applicable to its officers, agents, servants or employees, nor shall it be construed to limit or waive any insurance coverage to the City's status as an additional named insured as provided in paragraph XII of the agreement. VIII. FOOD SERVICE No food or drink shall be prepared, served, sold, or stored in the facilities. IX. DOCUMENTS AND OFFICERS SYBA shall submit to the Southlake Parks and Recreation Department a copy of rules and regulations,charters, constitution, and by-laws of SYBA. Names, addresses and phone numbers of all officers and board members of SYBA shall also be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Department within two weeks after election or appointment. Southlake Parks and Recreation Department shall submit to SYBA the names, addresses and phone numbers of all Parks and Recreation Department supervisors and managers and Parks and Recreation Board members within two weeks after election or appointment. (soi/ Rev.Date 10/2/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 2 Print Date 10/16/95 SOUTHLAKE YOUTH BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION • (IP/ X. ROSTERS AND SCHEDULES SYBA shall furnish the Parks and Recreation Department the number of players by age and division and zip code within one week following Opening Day of each season. A full schedule for the season will be submitted,if available one full week prior to Opening Day of each season. If full schedule is not available, SYBA will submit one month's schedule, one full week prior to those schedule games. XI. GYM MANAGER SYBA shall furnish the Parks and Recreation Department the names and telephone numbers of persons designated as Gym Managers. It shall be the responsibility of the Gym Manager to meet with and discuss gym conditions with a Parks and Recreation representative. It shall also be the responsibility of the Gym Manager to submit a work order form to the Parks and Recreation Department to request any maintenance not specifically mentioned within this agreement and/or needed repairs or supplies. The SYBA Gym Manager shall meet before each session with the Recreation Supervisor to be briefed on maintenance procedures and techniques. XII. INSURANCE SYBA shall maintain in effect a general liability insurance policy, naming the City and Carroll Independent School District as additional insured, in an amount of at least one million dollars C (S1,000,000) with such policy designed to cover the cost of defense and of liability for injuries suffered by competitors in the organized athletic activity. SYBA agrees to make insurance documents available to the City Manger on request. SYBA agrees to procure insurance to cover accident medical expenses for all players. This insurance benefit will be designed to pay the excess of any expenses payable by other valid and collectible insurance to an insured person for an injury caused by a covered accident. XIII. LIMIT ON HOURS OF PLAY SYBA agrees to stop play by 11:00pm. Special circumstances for tournament play may be negotiated with city staff. No full game should begin past 10:30pm. XIV. COMMISSIONER SYBA agrees to provide a league representative on-site at each SYBA organized league or tournament game held on the premises. C./ Rev.Date 10/2 95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 3 Print Date 10/16/95 SOUTH LAKE YOUTH BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION 5"i- 47 XV. EXHIBITS The City and SYBA agree that the exhibits attached to this agreement are incorporated into this agreement as if set out in their entirety. Exhibits included are: 1. MAINTENANCE EXHIBITS "A" Maintenance Agreement for Public Gyms 2. SYBA GYM REQUIREMENTS "B" 1995-96 Gym requirements XVI. SCHEDULING The City reserves the right to utilize the premises when SYBA activities are not scheduled. If SYBA fails to use the premises for its scheduled activities, this agreement is terminated. XVII. DEFAULT If either party,City or SYBA, violates any term of this agreement, either party may find the other in default and terminate the agreement. Any termination will be made with a thirty(30) day notice and the right to cure within ten(10) days. This agreement is made and entered into on the day of ,19_ CITY of SOUTHLAKE by: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Gary Fickes, Mayor City of Southlake Approved as to form Mark Lacroix, President City Attorney Southlake Youth Basketball Association This agreement approved by the Board of Directors, Southlake Youth Basketball Association, Inc. and entered into the minutes of the Board meeting held , 19 Keith Simmons, Secretary Southlake Youth Basketball Association Cei Rev.Date 10I2/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 4 Print Date 10/16/95 SOUTHLAKE YOUTH BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION C, EXHIBIT"A" MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC GYMS 1. The CISD shall maintain the gyms at competition quality. 2. The CISD shall be responsible for all school gym scoreboards and the lines leading to the scoreboards. CISD will provide SYBA access to the scoreboards during the season. SYBA will report any needed repairs to the Parks and Recreation Department. 3. SYBA shall provide basketballs and nets during the season. 4. SYBA shall be responsible for daily game and practice days collection of all litter and floor sweeping. 5. SYBA shall ensure that all secured areas remain locked and/or are locked at the completion of each activity. The CISD will provide the Gym Managers keys necessary for access to gyms. 6. SYBA shall ensure that no food or drink will be allowed in the gyms during practice and/or games. 7. SYBA Gym Manager shall meet with each school principal prior to season beginning, to be informed of"opening up and locking up" procedures. Ci 8. SYBA will provide all necessary maintenance equipment, used for its purposes, not specifically named in this agreement. Cio/ Rev.Date 10/2/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 5 Print Date 10/16/95 SOUTHLAKE YOUTH BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION . c c 03 c 0 00 ,. 00 .. 00 • en en V] en 00 en 00 en 00 0 • Sz �_ .c...1 to M O. M 0. ♦+ 0. en Cl., 'b 00 I 00 O. WI s.„� 00 V N c• ~ c ~ eri k 0 .-. 00 V] .-• 00 '-• 00 I 03 01 03 cn en E td — O .=. O es en 0. 0 Cl M N M M (i4 .• v1 .-• vl N V. 4o ir +-' L N cc e0 X 0 at CA w a� N CV c y tM O en cc e0 N 0 z Ce, gxral C N O �i >+ 00 00 T' E. .t H N N N (SU a� • N Z' O 0 'O O N O N O H 3 en - en M Q -0 w as L L 0i. c C0 LL� 00 00 cC I:O CC en Q en > \ N N .0 N enE., T, 'O �' N g � N CO Cl. 00 O. 00 0.. � enenM N tom. U d 0 .-+ ..r N 1 .... '.ut A 0 N L=• N I. so vO >: a a cad .D U Cd N E E Cl) w v�i O cc M - M 'C A � ,-• C ate+ 0 - 11 - gO aCI) C/) •..... N CIS w al 4-d b N ( N a O O 0 to • C/) t *a: E 8U y c0 $ $ (0/ U UVU ►-.rCID V 04 O � c E G. C7 E-+ a a City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim McAdams, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Consider YMCA Facility Utilization Agreement In accordance with the city's Park Use Policy, an organization wanting to use city or joint-use facilities must enter into a facility utilization agreement with the city. Attached is a draft agreement between the YMCA and the City of Southlake for the YMCA to run a basketball league at Johnson Elementary gym for grades K-2. The YMCA has a one million dollar insurance policy that is currently being looked over by the city attorney. Ms. Jane Cousins, Principal of Johnson Elementary, is requesting that the gym be added to the city/school list of joint-use facilities. The Joint-Utilization Committee will be considering her request at their next meeting on November 14. She has confirmed the dates and conditions outlined in this agreement between the city and the YMCA. The Parks and Recreation Bo ard will be reviewing this agreement Monday,November 6. The City Council needs to consider this agreement at their next meeting. Please call me at 481-5581 extension 757, if you have any questions. KM (iair 5J l CP/ FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT The parties to this agreement are the City of Southlake, Texas herein called"City", and the Airport Young Men's Christian Association'herein called"YMCA". FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual undertakings herein set out, the parties agree as follows: I. PREMISES City agrees to provide gyms and practice time as defined by Exhibit`B", YMCA Gym Requirements. Gym requirements and dates for the season shall be provided by YMCA to City at least 90 days prior to opening day of the season. Facilities in Exhibit `B" are herein called "Premises" in accordance with the terms of this agreement. II. SEASON AND HOURS The season of this agreement shall be annually on the days of Monday through Saturday, with each facility usage to not begin before 4:00pm on weekdays or 8:00am on Saturdays. Exhibit`B", YMCA Gym Requirements, is approximate dates for significant activities. III. RENEWAL OR TERMINATION This agreement must be renewed on an annual basis on November 1 of each year, with YMCA having the right of first refusal to enter into a new agreement. Changes in the agreement must be requested 90 days prior to the renewal date by either party. Written notification by the City must be provided to the City Manager, City of Southlake at City Hall. In the event YMCA terminates this agreement, YMCA will remove its own movable equipment which is not of a permanent nature upon non-renewal of this agreement within thirty(30) days. IV. FEES AND ASSIGNMENT YMCA shall not charge any fees for admission without prior approval of the Parks and Recreation Board for any event. (Example: approved tournaments) YMCA reserves the right to request a voluntary donation for admission to events other than regularly scheduled league games. YMCA agrees to provide signs clearly indicating donations are requested only for the YMCA activity occurring on Premises. Access to other premises activities shall be clearly available. YMCA shall not assign this agreement nor shall it rent out any property of the City without prior written consent of the City. C, Rev.Date 102/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT I Print Date 1025/95 YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION 0:a (0,1 V. UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES YMCA shall not engage in any activities on the premises which are in violation of any existing state, federal,local law or use the premises in such a manner as to constitute any hindrance for other park patrons engaged in lawful activities. VI. PERMISSION FOR INSTALLATION OR CONSTRUCTION YMCA, in accordance with the City's Donation Policy shall submit to the Parks and Recreation Board for approval to install or construct temporary or permanent structures, signs, equipment, or other related items. Permanent structures shall become the property of the School. YMCA is allowed a maximum of two (2) portable signs listing YMCA sponsors for the current and previous year. VII. INDEMNITY 1 YMCA shall indemnify and hold harmless the City of Southlake, its agents, officials and employees and any umpire or official,from any and all claims for bodily injury, illness, death, personal injury or property damage arising out of the activities of insofar as permitted by law, the City of Southlake shall indemnify and hold harmless the Young Men's Christian Association, its agents, officials, and employees and any umpire or official from any and all claims for bodily injury, illness, death, personal C„, injury or property damage arising out of the negligence of its officers, agents, servants or employees. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit or waive any governmental or sovereign immunity of the City of Southlake or any immunities applicable to its officers, agents, servants or employees,nor shall it be construed to limit or waive any insurance coverage to the City's status as an additional named insured as provided in paragraph XII of the agreement. VIII. FOOD SERVICE No food or drink shall be prepared, served, sold, or stored in the facility. IX. DOCUMENTS AND OFFICERS YMCA shall submit to the Southlake Parks and Recreation Department a copy of rules and regulations,charters, constitution, and by-laws of YMCA. Names, addresses and phone numbers of all officers and board members of YMCA shall also be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Department within two weeks after election or appointment. Southlake Parks and Recreation Department shall submit to YMCA the names, addresses and phone numbers of all Parks and Recreation Department supervisors and managers and Parks and Recreation Board members within two weeks after election or appointment. (00i, Rev.Date 10/2/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 2 Print Date 10f25/95 YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION • X. ROSTERS AND SCHEDULES YMCA shall furnish the Parks and Recreation Department the number of players by age and division and zip code within one week following Opening Day of each season. A full schedule for the season will be submitted, if available one full week prior to Opening Day of each season. If full schedule is not available, YMCA will submit one month's schedule, one full week prior to those schedule games. XI. GYM MANAGER YMCA shall furnish the Parks and Recreation Department the names and telephone numbers of persons designated as Gym Managers. It shall be the responsibility of the Gym Manager to meet with and discuss gym conditions with a Parks and Recreation representative. It shall also be the responsibility of the Gym Manager to submit a work order form to the Parks and Recreation Department to request any maintenance not specifically mentioned within this agreement and/or needed repairs or supplies. The YMCA Gym Manager shall meet before each session with the Recreation Supervisor to be briefed on maintenance procedures and techniques. XII. INSURANCE YMCA shall maintain in effect a general liability insurance policy, naming the City and Carroll dor Independent School District as additional insured, in an amount of at least one million dollars kr/ ($1,000,000) with such policy designed to cover the cost of defense and of liability for injuries suffered by competitors in the organized athletic activity. YMCA agrees to make insurance documents available to the City Manger on request. YMCA agrees to procure insurance to cover accident medical expenses for all players. This insurance benefit will be designed to pay the excess of any expenses payable by other valid and collectible insurance to an insured person for an injury caused by a covered accident. XIII. LIMIT ON HOURS OF PLAY YMCA agrees to stop play by 11:00pm. Special circumstances for tournament play may be negotiated with city staff. No full game should begin past 10:30pm. XIV. COMMISSIONER YMCA agrees to provide a league representative on-site at each YMCA organized league or tournament game held on the premises. J Rev.Date 10/2A5 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 3 Print Date 10/25/95 YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION C'll XV. EXHIBITS The City and YMCA agree that the exhibits attached to this agreement are incorporated into this agreement as if set out in their entirety. Exhibits included are: 1. MAINTENANCE EXHIBITS "A"Maintenance Agreement for Public Gyms 2. YMCA GYM REQUIREMENTS "B" 1995-96 Gym requirements XVI. SCHEDULING The City reserves the right to utilize the premises when YMCA activities are not scheduled. If YMCA fails to use the premises for its scheduled activities, this agreement is terminated. XVII. DEFAULT If either party, City or YMCA, violates any term of this agreement, either party may find the other in default and terminate the agreement. Any termination will be made with a thirty(30) day notice and the right to cure within ten(10) days. This agreement is made and entered into on the day of ,19_ C CITY of SOUTHLAKE by: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Gary Fickes, Mayor City of Southlake Approved as to form Jerry Pipes, President City Attorney Airport YMCA This agreement approved by the Board of Directors, Airport Young Men's Christian Association and entered into the minutes of the Board meeting held , 19 Brad Kimura, Secretary Airport YMCA (.0., Rev.Date 102/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 4 Print Date 1025P95 YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION .- a Ci EXHIBIT "A" MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC GYMS 1. The CISD shall maintain the gyms at competition quality. 2. The CISD shall be responsible for all school gym scoreboards and the lines leading to the scoreboards. CISD will provide YMCA access to the scoreboards during the season. YMCA will report any needed repairs to the Parks and Recreation Department. 3. YMCA shall provide basketballs and nets during the season. 4. YMCA shall be responsible for daily game and practice days collection of all litter and floor sweeping. 5. YMCA shall ensure that all secured areas remain locked and/or are locked at the completion of each activity. The CISD will provide the Gym Managers keys necessary for access to gyms. 6. YMCA shall ensure that no food or drink will be allowed in the gyms during practice and/or games. 7. YMCA Gym Manager shall meet with each school principal prior to season beginning, to be informed of"opening up and locking up" procedures. l 8. YMCA will provide all necessary maintenance equipment, used for its purposes, not specifically named in this agreement. Rev.Date 10/2/95 FACILITIES UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 5 Print Date 10/25/95 YOUNG MEN'S CHRLSTIAN ASSOCIATION b a) b c (1/I a al N = N O O k0 O O C) — 00 00 4, a) 4. ed a) kn VIen A fel W 'O N en N 10 1. a) = w. N Cg M N M � — gyp .-� �o N [ en cc: 12 ),...Cmm w H N z >C ate) F O w 3 cs as -Cy w N a c al 0 al ) ° � al N E N E - N F" .1:3N O Z. O 't C) c� U N en el en1- d v1 E. ,,c r- 'a q - z a) v) ' w a 0 a) Z d 6 eC U a) u' O 0 NgNg cil .0 i O.N C. �-� N M N M 'C , 'O "" �p "" %.o 1.i' 'CO O = «) N VI VI Cr, +�+ 00 v1 N V CA y E 00 C \ 5`"k^_ 7 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-183, Second Reading ZA 95-88,Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 3.38 acres situated in the William H. Martin Survey,Abstract 1068, Tracts 2A3 & 2A3A1 LOCATION: West side of the private street, Marantha Way, approximately 1,200 feet North of Randol Mill Avenue OWNER/APPLICANT: Lawrence L. Post CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District QUESTED ZONING: "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District- (This district permits a 1,500 s.f. home.) LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Five(5) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995; Approved (7-0), ZA95-88, Rezoning from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1 B" Single Family Residential District. COUNCIL ACTION: October 10, 1995; Approved (7-0), First Reading of Ordinance 480-183, ZA95-88, Rezoning from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1B" Single Family Residential District. STAFF COMMENTS: No plat has been submitted for this property; therefore, Staff does not know if the property will be subdivided prior to development. PG/Is G:\W PF\MEMO\CAS ES95\95-88Z.2CC 7A-1 J i L ' (ROANOKE 0 JJ 1 4 4 )- 1• F. ...____ ______ 4A1 40-c 1 I r T ) I . . - � 362 . - 4 q,..D / SURVEY A-1068 .:,z v,:1 „i,. • 10.15 Ac • 3 ' t 5 Ac 15 2C5 2C6 2C 2C,2C 2C1 : 2A52c ZC 2C2 rc�'ir,'. ��'»5�,��� 2C7 2C4 9 il1,..�l���s�y1M�•i. rya 1. a a 1 ii�� i"�V�1'i:�Jil'aL'ii�:�u�•�� .: ,..: i F �•� i 282 262/U E r�.tiii% I+!iP l'Vii;1 L .2A1. -. 0,.,....,. 1 I •A .. 6ill � i r I' n tA9 n M N i i v . v IUVUV i i 5 g5. SURVEY A-1 __.-'•._T _.4 j j.c1 1A3 y 1J ___ I J�' 1A1 A l 1A6 1 (�T� - i ! _:J SLEEPN,HOLLOW . -i(12 A IA1 11A7 1f 1E •-•-` ��j'f�-•-� i 1 i �.l 5 a Y11`' I 1 B = 1 1G 18 _.�._-_._._ _._._i---.4,._._.•1'.- J i i 0 1 WESTLAKE CITY LIMIT 1G5 1H iF i -e0000-a.c�oo --.- - tEl 161 :, i o---n.-000000000000ao- ' I KELLER CITY LIMIT ,s�1 �' 1 ^, 1 jOHM CH 479 1E2 1C2 'i 163 r xymcr 6070 4 • i ! i i li. 60 4 1E 164 • ' ' 1C I •>, i i1 i i 6o7P ( 2B i GItS , 60711 / ;.---• .,• v, 1 i FAYMAES RD , • L Y i' 0 L • . .. i•6A2 . 1A- in 1 1 i r"-likr-7-----77-17--- ... %. _j. , , 1 si 0 01 1 i '' \ • ,I.D1,10 .RA : 1. I. I.inn1 i i i %%. it.. i i. �. �1�Y1„ TRACT MAP ' - '�` ' I`\ `` • i SURVEY A-1604 III ! ! ,t,P'' , • ! ! ! _ -► ! .i ! GM 7A-2 1A1A1 i i _ `l VI V/1). 0 ___ \ ADJACENT OWNERS 2 A A AND ZONING I / / Spin #12 Representative . R. Strand David Baltimore 2 C 5 2C i" "AG" -.. - - 4- . - -, 4-:- , iii 2A5 2C7 2C : : tE L "AG" 232 r) A1 z B. Phillips J "AG" �- Q P. Pruitt 2 E ai ' t.. N 2 313 Town of Westlake Z - - - 2 n Z- - - 1A1 � „ ., IP ..AG.. + \ wigins G/ A A ' v Vi , ai 5 * SURVEY A - 16 0 0 1A3 1A 1J 0 5C 1 Ari 0 ( At 1A1 5A 1A6 ,--i)- \ i \- (6,..- th 1 1,A2 1 1A1 1 A 7 1 F 1 f il► A 1 7A-3 I.- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-183 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, A.` AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 3.38 ACRES SITUATED IN THE WILLIAM H. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1068,TRACTS 2A3 &2A3A1 ,AND MORE FULLY • AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT" • "FROM"AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1 B" S' GLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT T• THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN T S ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING • '; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE Z ING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC IN ► REST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ,ONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; OVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE C MULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A .EVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY F•R VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS AUSE; PROVIDING FOR . PUBLICATION IN THE OF. ICIAL NEWSPAPER; AN►. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE i ATE. IT � - , •. • • • • - '- a home • ity acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article. , Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agriculture District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by Li the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\CASES\480-1832RD Page 1 7A-4 i changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their (6., original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- . crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, G:\ORD\CASES\480-I83.2RD Page 2 7A-5 Lis hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 3.38 acre tract of land situated in the William H. Martin Survey, Abstract 1068, Tracts 2A3 &2A3A1 , and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein,from "AG" Agriculture District to "SF- 1 B" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to (ibelessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. . That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Lie 3:\OR D\CAS ES\480-:33.2 RD Page 3 7A-6 Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. • This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. L MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:1ORD\CAS ES\480-183.2 RD Page 4 7A-7 • (taw PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G:\ORD\CASES\ate 183.2RD Page 5 7A-8 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at an iron, pin found/in the occupied West line of said Martin Survey , said point being , . the Northwest corner of a tract described in a deed from Blease Tibbets , Trustee , to Susan Post of record in Volume 6669 , Page 832 , Deed Records, Tarrant County , Texas , said point also being the Southwest corner and POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract ; . THENCE, North 368 ..75 feet to an iron pin for corner ; THENCE N . 88° - 51 ' E. 378 . 67 feet to an iron pin for corner in a gravel road ; . THENCE S . 6° - 34 ' E . 370 . 33 feet to an iron pin for corner ; THENCE S . 88° - 51 ' W. at- 35 .60 feet passing an iron pin found in the Westerly line of said gravel road and continuing in all 421 .0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 3 .38 acres , of which 0. 26 acres are in road easement leaving 3 . 12 net acres. • • • • G:\ORD\CASES\480-I83.2RD Page6 7 A-9 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-185,Second Reading ZA 95-98,Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 9.857 acres of land situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, Tract 2A2 LOCATION: 1835 N.Peytonville Ave. (on the east side), approximately 2100 feet South of West Dove Road OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Carleo and Regina Capili CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District QUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P & Z ACTION: October 5, 1995; Approved(6-0), ZA95-98, Rezoning from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1 A" Single Family Residential District. COUNCIL ACTION: October 17, 1995;Approved(6-0)First Reading of Ordinance No. 480-185, ZA95-98, Rezoning from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. STAFF COMMENTS: A two-lot plat showing has been submitted for this property. Staff understands that the Applicants plan to construct a new home on the larger lot and will continue to lease the existing home on the other lot. 96t KPG/ls G:\W PF\MEMO\CASES95\95-98Z.2CC 7B-1 \ I r4A1 • 0159N 1 ` v �� 3 k ,\ 4- W ® 19.77 a i. THIROOP °�� SURVEY A-1510 •-� ,vie r/ t. SJ, f �_ 3ASAI 6.95 i q I 3A3A /—(1101 21.36 At IA -• ... is i '- 1. 1- ' • 7 ,t l /�Al 58t 182 181 78 , �/� 1.9 k 5.1/Ac 1 24.76 Ac, j. L— ,....----,----,,-----1-1--- A 6117 Ac 7AS 1 7A1A1 7A1A 7A1MIA6 ./ •(��/���pp 1}�,�y��,g (� 2 L,I N1 5c ;, 5A1A 18181 .J`�y I�AILSa o. AMA Ltig1 B IN too .V 1 Y..11.�. L`^/. i j ^r IIJ )819181A 1BIA SURVEY A �� S p�G' 1816 u ✓ 48] MI 182 ( 1161. 1 k •_ 810 j 7 Ac 379 Ac 35.19 Ac \ 84.22 Ac 20.017 k 3 C ' 11 18 E✓1 1377 k 9.05 Ac eii R P' 7A1A no 8:1B2A ITION —� ,E16- 2-126 k ' _- 1 3.85 Al1E1 IDI (f)0A110KE DOW no Mo.3.03) �7y�,, :11^ "A!'" D I S.Z � �1 ��-_a._ 1H 0 IB 1f7d 5 16 182 736 Ac 2.i5 1.87 2 Ac SA �� HEST ttM L 57REE7 i- I is e r 1 1 i ifl 1 1 i 1 1 , 1\ 1 _ ,: 1A 1 1 RD .EE9 1 7/T--! Itik /A1 a E --.-- ._-r0{---- ask 1 .' f/" /" r 2AI �p rj ——b-aL- 1• , , ----,--- • ( _ C so- 1.3 J---J---1 i i ``. 1B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ```` _l/i 1 � re' I f f 1 Di 1 1 1 ` t . (� DART•�j to salvo'CT V t E�W�/ p 1�/�7 1'�' - ' C. ®L.�W U IA1 •.p."',Pt>✓T. o jicwJl__------ , . J. Urc/E5T i 1 SIRICT A-2003 17 B Y i I •i - '. - -K'Y A-72 ,$ . 1A1 SUVKY 4-t620 IA A, i 1 = ��A( 'D • ROU O 1 •% 1 Sk p 15k LAMP !' ��__ 68.7k • u` 101 ,a k r i • "i 1 1 '141t1 r T I/1i r - 1*'rri Fa=fit - i 2A3 Q t 1 . F^'.5 E ' 1 r 1 1 1 1 13k i i s i.` t 38 . t t IC /"�7D ` lJ GR M KLR ,6E1 _ E A I ' p _ 7A i i U 6f 0 ' i ' i s -� I 1 1 • 78 1 I1.A -- DI,EY'•I r. 2J �1 `i �.% 602 i , 66 i ---.ri;. !I . - 3+ a ` i. 661 -..._. 11114s: i n E 1 1 i i' ■ 1 -t'- 1_ i �12at4o1.a _.' •._. .r._. - ._.__ 18 ._.i._._.___ �p,5 �2E1�� P i i i ,�X ®H�1 ��C�wi'i11L®I�[ 36 t *so111rr A-Z33. ' ._..-- i 1 : 1 33 i : R `>l : �, 2C2 ..--- ---------- V I� IANETS i 113$1 --BNR - ---'---- /(/'�(yy i i 1 a es _ To i1._. ._. 3 3A GG • Gq✓1-i_.,_._,: .'. j A (�� 8fi 8f 80 8D 8D3 8C 1 381 3E •26k 7k .C!G. ._.. -• 1- ` 1 ' V... .• 332 3f �/I �/7 D D 1K2 ' .....--i.., It.. -._. • ��®WY -Y&Br � ARr1° F 2 1 i i SLIMY A-705 KV 4401A110 SIMI 4; i-- . •i• i i 1 - - -' __ uun 118 SM 1 5.53 k 8A 8At1 8416 84 rA, 8184 8Al2 8 6 A! S 'c iG. � �j i 6 i, �•� �1411_1�(1-'11 -- ‘ 1 Ik 1IE AM A ; ( 1 / A 8 /� `.�-c �i i 1 6 6 k 8A7 % 8631 , 1 ;.' ._.1.-.1 1- --- 8A15 yy 0A d1t0 ffi ' 2' TRACT MAP '"' 98 1 .---�,� 1 i i i i 1 ---�-- 1 ' i i i i 1 i l/� �� 4 / Vail ' N . 2818 2 284 2B1 • 1 i 13 •' A` 2BIE ' •, . �J R 2 35 k 1 I .. '' ; r1 f.'1i1...11111 /1� 1 1 1 /v— _ • I I �_. - �/' 1 7 �l I I \ --, 1 N3G VD I I / l 1 j 3 > / w J � U Q Q _ <, _I , N Q I PE) I Li b , b 1 . 44 7 7:: . _ , i ` ".„ CC h / d 1 O L.". •Li \ N1 J W NIViI88 V Z > > � Q Q //Zoe 1 13 1-/ z Or' 1 >--- Po. Ve, co �, N a. L-c•\... amiNVIIZ4/1 . . I _ I N U I = m = Q _ Q y m . I as Qo Q �LL U U. U 1-- �\ _ �� L n _ .c . - . _0- •= - . _ - • - • - • - L -\_;.. - k-i- -. 'D.-NA Z < as r -----\ ni- 1 7B-3 ,- — — . . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-185 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 9.857 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE THOMAS BEEDY, ABSTRACT NO. 72, TRACT 2A2, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1 A" 'SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT '0 THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZON 4 G MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF TH ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBL INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DE • i I ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN : )E; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL t CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVID► G A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PE ALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; L, PROVIDING A SA GS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN /THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFJ`ECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of outhlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate purs t to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to • amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agriculture District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by L, the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\CASES'480-185.2RD Page 1 7B-4 Ichanges should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does fmd that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their (hie original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is. a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, (110.' G:\O R D\CASES\4 80-185.2 R D Page 2 7B-5 is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 9.857 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, Tract 2A2, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agriculture District to "SF-1 A" Single Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified,and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to Lelessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:',ORD\CASES\430-185.2RD Page 3 7B-6 L. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. (610, MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:\ORD\CASES\480-I85.2RD Page 4 7B-7 Lie PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: (We G:\ORD\CASES\480-185.2RD Page 5 7B-8 EXHIBIT "A" BEGINNING at a found 5/8" iion rod in the East line of N. Peytonville Avenue. said iron rod being by deed call North, 306.16 feet and East. 26.50 feet from the Southwest corner of the above mentioned T. Seedy Survey; THENCE North along the East line of N. Peytonville Avenue. a distance of 232.70 feet to a found 1/2"iron rod: THENCE East. departing the East line of N. Peytonville Avenue. a distance of 1845.27 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod: THENCE South. a distance of 232.70 feet to a found 1/2"iron rod; THENCE West. a distance of 1845.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 9.857 - acres of land. • L • • (OW G:\ORD\CASES\480-I85.2RD Page 6 7B-9 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-99,Plat Showing REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Showing for Lots 2 and 3 of the T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, being 9.857 acres of land situated in the Thomas Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, Tract 2A2 LOCATION: 1835 N.Peytonville Ave. (on the east side), approximately 2100 feet South of West Dove Road OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Carleo and Regina Capili CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural — REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-IA" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P &Z ACTION: October 5, 1995;Approved to Table(6-0),ZA95-99, Plat Showing for Lots 2 and 3 of the T.Beedy No. 72 Addition until the October 19, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the Applicant's request. October 19, 1995;Approved(7-0),ZA95-99, Plat Showing for Lots 2 and 3 of the T. Beedy No. 72 Addition, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated October 13, 1995, deleting item#4 (Lot 3 does not meet the intent of the 100' minimum lot width requirement.) and meet the requirement stated in item#6 (20' minimum side yard). STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated October 13, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plat Review Summary No. 3 dated November 3, 1995. KPG/ls G:\WPFIMEMO\CASES95\95-99PS.ICC 7C-1 , ` ` I (2A1 • 1 WLSUNJ '7 J - 2 3A48 3 2 /\` 4- �.3% 3A4A 19.77 A, I • 'i. THIROOP ��/ :AL. ' - 13 \ v yyflMIEr A-1510 % � 7 s rA i ``. .- 3A3A1 3A}A 6.45 • IA '7 �.� f- o n 36 k r ;-1- . ti 3A1• 7 7A' 181 �/ 4.9 Ac ytt •At 18 78 1 24.76.Ac�-`'-'r. `'� 7A1A 7A1111611k . J .7 83A7 Ac 11611111 7AIA1 (�/\ i A .__ •v 1' 5A1A 11� 18181 ,�`y 3 0. 1111A,II IUV pooRp 8 •\v. UUB NM 1818,gt� SURVEY A-11.H \(�` i ` �I 1 p �'" �i_�1' ". 182 .57.RIEr A-1104A 181C 191 4. c Ac ICI ✓ 11A1 182 I 181 \ 810 N.2Z Ac 2 Ac 179 Ac 35.19 Ac `'�1 20.017 Ac .'rfy W:air. , 3 159 I',1212 'II E5 L 11.77 Ac 9.03 Ac 70.1A 1 -,BE 8�182A •-• f lo" 18 b 2.126 Ac 1l _AFv. 1 385 AI 1E1 101 (ROANOKE DOW ND No.J.60) .�� ._ 1H 18 lILT . 7`-- 1: \\ . • B2A1 --• 182 --- I 2.15 1C 1.87 2 k/ S SA L 7.J6 Ac 4 1 .a.. HEST Cs „ stNrEr I 4 2 '7' 1 i .- _. -1 1 .'-- , , •- --- --" •-• r 1 1 , • 1 1 1 1 Mt a G ---- - 51 -- 0k 1. , 1 r1Ai 1 IC 1 - / 1 e. , 1 1 , , , 1 \ `\-_ - , ` /,IlI , - , ; . 1 •'82 1�' 11 /�(� 1A2 �ITEIANY T y i I �v/ ---I- 111Q9! 11T�7y•1•/' ' . . Co .D1 T TA1 • Q .T._.: ._.aT:_.MED __ -, : J. .WEST AY 1 i SWIE7' A-200J 17 0•: ? A• STAPIEY. A-72 g . IAI 54R/EY A-1620 to I i , I IO -p 51Al Rod ' S A,: ' 15 Ac �Nlp GA•ir 68.7 Ac • Im 10 Ac _ • A f111•l ll - , pr i 1 i i 2A1 r/ 1 i • F^'nE. t� .G , t 1 1 1 1 13 Ac , i s. r *tTJlI1.E 1G �51: ii Y _ 78 -- ply ' i i - 1 1 1 IA 2J 1 \ ; �.(.` ,II �i 1:11.,1 I ' *ra • �__ _.1 ` �Ivi- `I 1,....01, a f L: - 011N C 1 16®(1Cg 33-433 ; .Y II 3c 28 S, �* A n i i 1 i 1 "., -JCL.- Ap 4 • l ._ .� ...i_.,.i.� _ .a �i 1 T VI- x X1 BF SG dfl 803 BCr, GJC i L� A 381 ,� 7 14.q. ._.. �+ ` 26..�� I 18z e B __�• '' ‘ 3T • THQUAA�--;,1 ib I r _2I7I ec2 (_,� 1; .' ' it_. ��� SLIMY A-7176 A� IIREST HIOlA1s SIRES' Y' 1 Y _ '.� 1 A,q" .%' �.Q. - ; - - - -- u� 5.53 Ac IIB BM t 81 • M d1N 8A16 us BABA SA12 8 a . 1 ,. '1.,� lam" '%. , IIC 11E B A ( / A ":t f •1 i A 1 \ 8A8 II �__®-1 B 4 8 —• 882A`-'—.BB 4y. iir°9 '-Ei 1 A T_.•"� i i i OBAI '1 A 'B BA15 1"' i i • ' • BA2 6A99Mi1 8A10 ,_ 8 i ®18 -A•. i 1 i T - TRA •CT MAP 8A1 ) { i , i i i i I 1 V L / 1 � 8c82 2 2131 • v . 1 i _•i 2${A i17 f 1. R/c" 5GY'p,,•`1 I l _ _-. ' •,'i ice, ' `. 2840 --4--1" I B V, , . - B ' /4_ a -- '�'� , ( , 1 7C-2 uk lI 7' ' I 28 C.1".1lnA - ----, ) Q /---,--• f q I I --, • --/ I `L 1 Lye . ---. i NaleIVO I I l I 5 _d /• o 1 oi I o Qr---1 (NI C. .1 Q _ _I N Q 1 ��-1 I 0 0 j I---IJ b or b i a a . o • CO l \ 1 W �� Z C'3 / o U U U S Z _ . _ / _Q = Q ' O Z , 0 d o o 1 I— N LL Cire- .N1 � J W � N I V I I 8 �—, (,) Z ' CI -� a ho z L-. ,/ F- _ . _ L1 • ..."/i/HZ/ N U I = a a ¢ y m - 1 Q o 5 Lt. I. V — 07 � — . — LL 2 - fn _O- P LL- - • — • — • - L ____, ,k Z 1— 4 \• — 7C-3 • City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY ase No: ZA 95-99 Review No: Three Date of Review: 11/03/95 Project Name:Plat Showing -Lots 2&3.T.Reedy No.72 Addition,being 9.857 acres of land in the T. Seedy Survey Abst#72 Survey Abst.#500 OWNER/APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Carleo and Regina Capili A P Surveying Company 1835 N. Peytonville Avenue 1903 Central Drive Suite#309 Southlake. Texas 76092 Bedford.Texas 76021 Phone: Phone: (817) 267-1249 Fax : (817)481-5365 Fax : (817)267-0148 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/31/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties within 200' of the project tract: A. Provide the corresponding deed volume and page for Barney G. Stevens tract adjacent to the north line of the project tract. B. Label the type and width of the easements within Garden Addition adjacent to the west line of the project tract. 2. Correct the graphic metes and bounds description,P.O.B.,and original tract lines to match the written metes and bounds description of the plat dedication. 3. Lot 3 does not meet the intent of the 100'minimum lot width requirement.. 4. Staff recommends that a survey be provided, signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the location and distances shown for the existing structures in relation to existing and proposed boundaries,to insure compliance with the zoning regulations prior to the filing of this plat. This survey should show existing house, all accessory structures, and all septic lines,water wells, etc.. with dimensions to existing and proposed property lines. 5. The proposed lot lines shown on the separate sketch do not match those of the plat. It would appear that the existing house on Lot 2 does not meet the minimum side yard requirement of 20' in relation to the proposed south lot line of Lot 2. Correct the lot configuration to meet this requirement. 7C_4 • City of Southlake,Texas * Please submit 2 revised blueline "check prints" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original signatures along with a separate survey showing the location and dimensions of the existing structures in relation to the existing and proposed lot boundary lines. * Denotes Informational Comment Carleo and Regina Capili A P Surveying Company G:\WPF\REV\95\95-099PS.WPD --__ 7C-5 __ A Cr.' .. P w...N uv4l.a�a�.�l� 1 —TTT?1 COr 16A.•• , /r,rs�7lyf✓4Lt Avf1W,� . •EE 1 i sr • I 1 Ij t 1 iI I ii _ I s 1 i 1 I � rf 1 I • 1 I r- I I1IIJ 4Ri a _g '1 i.. ' i ; 1 I flifil rt 4 I C a if11 it ig t t C'� ytfi 61 :fit11 /j Y: i ��''/ d I . I J� iL. ; ! ' ! I 1111. (: 6 !r 1 I Ii1! p . li ;id I etMP 1111 ij 1111 t1 iif11 i11 t tir it i ii di I iib 3 it fi t _ t tei .... tal IIa I I.I! I f( 1> >[i I. ! (y J■< lE Ir a�[= << 11jt I�l I I 4!' • # alb f Ir !¢ t it i .1 1 i MI i l i 1 1. 1 it f ('I iji . .� ji Ili 1 1 Iat aIy " iE i#� it 1i! 1 :�' Ii ; iii I i!a i1 1 i I i 1 I I I I SiczG I I I k a Scow � -1 II�- Pg-4z9Li r : n "1 I ux 4.1 ppyNO • '�I (� i----'r-2 z� 1-.. °coo 4 i `n3 : EEIi , CX ° is I Tz ._�.:..-.. � 7C-6 0{ i C A \\ n ff�m �i i i.'.?. .O 0 4 r rp i. L (..,_, • . J • ! ' ^o al J 1 _, ha ■W 1 t..0 ammo ' r V i 6 6 i • (..,„ foou7H sst7'io:i LOT.O tb{u 7 C—_ soa-4e 0 o_ City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-99 Review No: Owe Two Date of Review: 10/13/95 Project Name:flat Showing -Lots 2 &3,T.Reedy No.72 Addition, being 9.857 acres of land in the T. )3eedy Survey Abst# 72 Survey Abst. #500 OWNER/APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Carleo and Regina Capili A P Surveying Company 1835 N. Peytonville Avenue 1903 Central Drive Suite#309 Southlake,Texas 76092 Bedford.Texas 76021 Phone: Phone: (817) 267-1249 Fax : (817) 481-5365 Fax : (817) 267-0148 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/09/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHERCLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties within 200' of the project tract: A. Provide the corresponding deed volume and page for Barney G. Stevens tract adjacent to the north line of the project tract. B. Show and label the easements within Garden Addition adjacent to the west line of the project tract. 2. The following changes are needed with regard to easements: A. Provide a 10' U.E. centered on the existing utility line crossing the west line of Lot 3 from North Peytonville Avenue into Lot 2. B. Provide centerline bearings and distances for the 10' U.E.'s, with distances to the nearest property corner at points of intersection with the lot boundaries. 3. Correct the written and graphic metes and bounds description to reflect the entire area of land described in the deed to the Capili's. It is staffs understanding that the description for this tract should extend to the centerline of North Peytonville Avenue. 4. Lot 3 does not meet the intent of the 100' minimum lot width requirement. 5. Provide the dimensions to property lines from all accessory structures shown on the separate survey showing existing structures.This survey should also show the location of all septic lines, • water wells, etc. with dimensions to the proposed lot lines and existing boundary lines. (II 6. The existing house on Lot 2 does not meet the minimum side yard requirement of 20' in relation to the proposed south lot line of Lot 2. 7C-8 City of Southlake,Texas * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 10/23/95. All revised submittals must contain seventeen(17) folded 6" x 9" blue line prints and one (1) 11"x 17"revised reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Carleo and Regina Capili A P Surveying Company ic: Appendix 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance No.483-C G:\W PF\REV\95\95-099 PS.W PD 7C-9 7oa� �nnvua w F . t A .vuc o TTJ IT t I : p I j ji ! I £ t. I i i t 1 £ •s I I € i I Ill: a9 fta i I E j I r1.0 TI! g i f ii �i�I Ili! / I i r t € II 1 i r. rj e:T� :fit 7L 6l S rH- 1I1Jii! I 'tfi '1!I! flhiI I l iiiiiitJ r •�s -BF r iI $ i I 1r1 I . y I I l,t I IN I 4 ; :1 III ( • _- 1 . I I I Ico 71 I ' ' CO m I I R i mo-`01 . - o Ci . IT . S m-el, p� n I —' - �' Yx�O. N = =f 7H .F. 7C-10 • MI s.4S rtyro4YNlt AVENUE 0. 1 111 r1:1 `MOST. tsar L .. , •... S66160100 t ` u Uu.. .1 I. • • (if.. _ • . 3 ® „ ♦ y H l t• • • I ` \� 61011 i w...rar�r..r�rrwca..r..r..n , iw..•e..r.wr.rr.r..wrya.0,rv...rr. . . r. enigma a•a..rrrrar•rrrrti.y12..a.ra.a.r0. rr...yrrwxnrr rr•rrrrrr w r.a.a.a r.rw.rrrwromea•rr•r.a.arrr.an wows semi•••••rr.waxr.•rr•..rr....rrwrrr .rr..w0•r.ri/0•011r•..0 Tam..rrrw..+a•w.a. A wra .rrwrrrrrr•.rrau.rr•r.r V o-0 .a V to nwr..•..ax+wr.r Winer rr......r.r m y / .g11aaYF.O.T V A..arrY•.....wr..a f f ...ar r1.1 ' rr / • 'r'....0w r rrr rr .um'-r' , • • i • . ( soot. • ax.T • Lod.0 LO(" s (•}LOew I A.00rnow 0 7C-11 4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tom Elgin, Planner SUBJECT: Impact Fees - Land Use Assumptions (LUA) Public Hearing In March 1995,the City Council began the process to update the City's water and wastewater impact fees and to initiate roadway impact fees. The Council approved contracts for consultants and appointed a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC). Attached is the first"milestone" product of the impact fee adoption process-Land Use Assumptions for Impact Fees. It was developed by J.T. Dunkin&Associates,the planning consultant,with input from the CIAC. The procedure for adoption of impact fees is established in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. The procedure may be summarized as follows: 1. Preparation and adoption of the land use assumptions - Projects the City's population, employment and land use changes over a ten-year period(on an annual basis)and defines the service areas for water,wastewater and roadways within the City. 2. Preparation and adoption of the capital improvements plan - Defines the incremental infrastructure improvements over the ten-year period attributable to new development based on the land use assumptions. 3. Calculation of the maximum impact fees-Determines the maximum allowable impact fee for new development based on the capital improvements plan. 4. Adoption of impact fees by ordinance - Establishes the impact fees assessed to new development. The adoption procedures within Chapter 395 are very specific. In accordance with the statute, the attached land use assumptions have been available for public inspection, and notices on this public hearing have been published. The purpose of the public hearing is to gather public comment on the Land Use Assumptions for Impact Fees. L LMEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 3, 1995 PAGE 2 Please place this item on the November 7 City Council meeting agenda. It requires no action by Council; however, the adoption of the land use assumptions, the next agenda item, will require Council action. TE G:IWPFIMEMOISTAFFICEHILUA PHWPD '-\ b_ '2- L L CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS .FOR IMPACT FEES thime September 11, 1995 Prepared by: J. T. Dunkin & Associates, Inc. Urban Planners - Landscape Architects Dallas, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE (Jr LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS FOR IMPACT FEES PURPOSE Chapter 395 (formerly S.B. 336) of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate development impact fees. The initial process is the establishment of land use assumptions. These land use assumptions,which include population and employment, will become the basis for the preparation of impact fee capital improvement plans for water, wastewater, and roadway facilities. To assist the City of Southlake in determining the need and timing of capital improvements to serve future development,a reasonable estimation of future growth is required. The purpose of this report is to formulate growth and development projections based on assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity, and timing of various future land uses in the community, and to establish and document the methodology used for preparing the growth and land use assumptions. (me ELEMENTS OF THIS LAND USE ASSUMPTION REPORT This report contains: I. Methodology - Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the land use assumptions II. Service Area Maps (Plates 1, 2, and 3) -The impact fee service areas for water,wastewater, and roadway facilities based on data collection zones and/or traffic survey zones III. Base Data - Information on population, employment, and land use for Southlake as of January, 1995 for each data collection zone IV. Ten-Year Growth Assumptions - Population and employment growth assumptions for 10 years by data collection zones or traffic survey zones (TSZ) and impact fee service areas V. Ultimate Projections-Projections which reflect a completely developed condition based on the City's Future Land Use Plan or ultimate "built out" scenario VI. Summary - Brief synopsis of the land use assumptions report 1 I. METHODOLOGY (Iire Based on the growth assumptions and the capital improvements needed to support growth, it is possible to develop an impact fee structure which fairly allocates improvement costs to growth areas in relationship to their impact on the entire infrastructure system. The database and projections in this report have been formulated using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. These Land Use Assumptions and future growth projections take into consideration several factors influencing development patterns, including: 1. The character, type, density, and quantity of existing development 2. Existing zoning patterns 3. Future Land Use Plan 4. Availability of land for future expansion and the physical holding capacity of the City 5. Current growth trends in the City 6. Location and configuration of vacant land (hosof 7. Employment and population absorption rates 8. Known or anticipated development projects 9. Sewer availability 10. Comparison to historical growth rates of area cities Following is the general methodology used for the preparation of this report: 1. Establish impact fee service areas for water, wastewater and roadway facilities based on data collection zones and/or traffic survey zones (Section II - Service Area Maps) 2. Collect/determine benchmark data on population, employment and land use as of January 1, 1995 (Section III - Base Year Data) 3. Project population and employment growth for ten years by impact fee service areas and data collection zones (Section IV -Ten-Year Growth Assumptions) 4. Project the ultimate population and land use (by land use category) for a fully developed city (Section V - Ultimate Projection) Detailed methodology for each of the above is contained in the respective sections. (owe 2 II. SERVICE AREA MAPS Lir' Plates 1, 2 and 3 show the proposed service areas for roadway, water, and wastewater facilities respectively. The boundary for water and wastewater facilities is the existing City Limits which was the same service area as in the initial 1990 water and sewer impact fee study and its subsequent update in 1993. Plate 1, entitled"Service Areas for Roadway Impact Fees,"depicts the 8 proposed service areas for roadway facilities. The proposed roadway service area boundaries encompass anywhere from 1 to 8 traffic survey zones. A Traffic Survey Zone (TSZ) is a type of data collection zone, established by NCTCOG for all areas within the NCTCOG region, including within the corporate City Limits of Southlake. the Traffic Survey Zones n Southlake vary in size from about,;f2 to 1400 acre These zones are based on the areas used for transportation computer modelling for Southlake and termed traffic survey zones. The traffic survey zones were formulated on the basis of homogeneity and traffic generation potential using major arterials, railroad lines and other physical boundaries for delineation. Since the data needed for calculation of roadway impact fees is required to be compiled by TSZs', the land use assumptions are compiled by the same traffic survey zones or combinations thereof. The Traffic Survey Zone Map is a standardized map available at the NCTCOG and City of Southlake municipal offices. These traffic survey zones will be aggregated into different areas to form service areas for roadway impact fees. The roadway service areas were formulated based on three primary parameters; one, the boundaries of each service area are consistent with the boundaries of the TSZs,two, each zone is less than three miles in diameter (a size requirement specified in Subchapter A, Section 395.001 of the Impact Fee Statute), and three, a conceptual roadway capital improvement plan was used for a comparison of proposed projects as they related to the service zone boundaries. Although the capital improvement plan and impact fees will be prepared as a separate document for roadway facilities, the geographic boundaries of the roadway service areas will be the same as shown on Plate 1. 'The original traffic survey boundary structure for Southlake was created in 1986 by NCTCOG. The structure was updated after the 1990 census results were published. The TSZ boundaries are consistent with census tract boundaries. 3 OEM III=Allpllk--". •1M= iME M ••••'.. ..,,. ., .., L.,_ ii ..: uthlak (be D '- 11.:,.. r--1- / I ‘41,''Zi4 -.., : ___,,yji, _, 1 '4-... Ilia I -,-... --, ' ' I zem - I_ 111-1 I it. GA .4 1 ri, e•ei,./.1,V1 1 ,- ,. • ... L.I rep, ,--.,_ • , & - 4 ,,,.. • -, iii . , .._.......• . ..— ."•-•-'...1.. vitimm.u.--- 4 , - ri • r.._ -- --f - , • __--- -- - ., - ;:tet1 - ::-,:..,1"." ME&-' .::-. Ake +.. w,. - . -.I .:„-,0:-... bil-Wi....' • . n•Iftl. gigtivior,:z A fid um"pl, _IIIII 1-- --PP-1k 4 - ?r,„,,, . ti.„.„..„.,t.,,,...... . .11 ow y;x1:;H:= °11•1"""mmim- . .-- - ' -------- . - X--- /.-.- :-M. . P 011 i II.::,...,,-, I ,,.-- - --I 1 A, , :.-. . 1 1:!.*...- m ligir !h.._ ; , I._ ) -1- :::111.11621112411 , _1 i I . 1 I ' 1----1411""'• 171 ..—=: 4' , -1-14°1 virill malig it/1171. Il - S' .__.I ,I.„.....,.,. - .,. ivy ..- , • i, _.... v • ...... ,___ - illimpi ill • Illni 11111filtiii if ium••=ww- lk •am — 1 / \ ,.. -:- i I 1111111 •--7, Il Erin.=:-- -(11111111.1111111111 kW 1••=111111.11/1. ril% A ••• 41111 :17.1ritl"li lial - -....# smisipt.agalk.,...cerg. ismi Apii.ww:-._. ..T. ...ran swirtirir.wmMit loll 11111 . •nr.•"i,..N-et a• wi :':..,-.':'7 r:'.':-A tilr ii'Vr.'11111111111 . '1-47:31, ;111: i 11111.-wrI,41,.. Ali. 1111 inillimil lir2NEP;:twi tri ".''Y•:‘. ..::7, ;.17:4iv a 111;74 ,i :.20::= AM- 1 ikiNI'vlfk.LIC-r---- laTiAr.l!w 'E.-. -•10, ' riir.=-Iiii*ElgramIMIIIIEN,IINtih:M_ il „„,--con = .11;11111 7-- - -.. ''' ''' r 1- , i; ...=E• ,:r..29 i_ .- .0710111ak= raw:• U rel' =:::41P 11,11:155."1:, :FZjjg.mn,„- L-1=.rtTfftgIM 4----.- ,.: •II iit 11111.. ii jjj M...16 jp, -Nun min inintri$E=.1,1 —.... ioli,„A a•••••,, =i •2 imams— __..... ....... IN ir. .. IL. „..i. ..„12, ,milo , ....m....=—,-2:1 •r.iss_,._-.Ekoorm. l,„ - mom -r; 1 Mari Fmli PI ,.--:.____;LEInrii :•,:,..-,..:--- %-iti.-41 ' it •um .,!..•...it.74.4..-..s Ita,' so. ' EillilillniNqgfil=ff'VINO IP i;112 Bit- NI4111. 1111L__IIIII icrAri..:-..... ..,-:,-;j7,::-.1 ,;!, Immell:34:54•1 . .— timmi-mi awe . 17,6 II ..... IMEOPPPOiF:•ava ...'-=''''"1"*" mm..1•4141 lirs-gra• ilielM 1 krlibdli i ------ ,,,,„,,. t , _• ,,,,,If..i.,:r = II 2.147...t,gioxamiii,„„ir 1 -11,- vgiii..-4 91;711.311 ,_s, 1 Or 'I riZentitl. 1,;':'•-,!!..,Me '''''''''' — 11111112di'imriV ,-,.."-7.1:::::41.: In4- - 21-7-eri, E;gm --Tam Flom ,,,,,. • la pel*s,,,;74p 4:::, ,i:,-:-......:F. ...7,7. ,-:,. a 114014-tv:_.„..--gsfl,s7:i_ ri iliktilt.T.tAe.1 "- •..:.1.11iiimanalii,i il " 4*...I:E.--=g11:41 • ar'• 6.Ciesistaj .1411112,111iirtr tali a.-ex ...,,t %Arr.= 3... N7111 1:11E !E.g. ut ,:przinz_FITOir";. . ...•.is- .4.4.1;.)ki hg... v.....orrill= VA\ Li .4..,••' .:i il'53-7;?'*eri.„........ar,„ .....„.. _.,... • - -_......-4, „......., ,..„,...„.:..._,,..... ........ _ pt.:min:as Irl ii 111111111111141 AilliMiirg,,b-: E.5. 7.1, fiAtAlan;•F. • .11111111P4 i 'ailliv41.44 iti.A ......w -,•-. - Ire,i 1.4.-....11517 I: 4+."*-1 .:7';''TP:;;5:713t.?421kt: Mill 1111111 111:41311111111S1111011riti +a !:.•_-,:-.....:3„-.V.. iii OMNI pr" ek c kt,Ei3.:::....-4.- 7.... -.7 , ti.u. ! ‘...;:t1 Al -1141:::1111'-.E.C-Its 104 ii. leff 1,...,...::, ..;. E7 .. .z. .1,1,::::e.t.t="1 =all.. _ .......: - _ .: siusEi 111.1.! USAIllim '111111:1111mr r''''''!"-m"'" *inq 911 :ram. -...• I.. limp ihr: imm.—Zi'vo 1:7 il ,c-Liik4-.1=:' ii—j.!4,:vt...t- .--;1•:,,-.•-=.---..- u_ „- Illi Er ..41111 imersow..4 lowalr.=,i.„ !'l 2 if•-•"1:1 ,-,.c I "us:- ;•-='•.....11 I.3'.•,1111.r •••„. . •• • . 11_.,..d sr:* _...., 01 „. „.„,....,....„:„.,. .„,„...:,,,,.....7,„.,.., r.F :„ 9 r-'1,-,-..._-..v.4007, I I Ilmaill , -4111 ' ' "1111111617j,_I-&-'4:mmommiii -.11:2, :iti }-.!-zis....Aiim,. .. , - 1111-a.. i -sl.3,'1F-Szic. ARM= riti ...-.;-;l4=1 ,«Ainsiii illEntykaiktg,R:i.iLig.1...., .... .. - - .4-: lir ,em 41141111.i.41111°-‘1111111.111 mill I ;.1 Usiii10'. - '' '-.4"'*:;:::,:i: itTil'i: . '-, '• • "::. I Ii. 111110 143/4114;111 Isi ,iiiiillillil. I/ II ;Ell OP - ifjone-4, ini 111/ • 'II Ile •'t • •=.• )i • III .:a 411 "T 2 1 _ , ilia -•:^ii ili a I ,1.!-; . -...- - .. s cr0,3VICE AREAS FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES briassbeimmEr OF SOUTHLAKE • PLATE 1 me _ , . . ,.„._ ..,. , ,i ��_i Duthlak - -�. I iII':IIIOIL1 .a e ` ': � �� ; Imo ` ,_I;,. , lio:, . i I MUNI I - tt� I t `i`+ pad ;- Imo``=--==r' :-" 1 , I 0.. oiIIIII.-:::::,!,-,[, .., iiiII - EMI • \i r— i rT "\ •i. v\\ • :.---11A1=.--44.. M- t'7= '7i1r1 'A ( +i A=° r1.N...lis 0t iAo1lol1k hitr 1 eas Sri 1• - „7 P _ l S14:r- ' i8�� - 113.-ai[ i n =11 :. =,J li j 1111111 Irl i �t ., s.p 1 - s.•,. _ MI te. mama zEsz, II iiiiiillni..111116.1.1741 , _ ....triti.::.1.4.illeiciii --`••••-•i •.,.•10,411:009. bill NI r",t ''''''( -----1? , _ , . mu ..1 rh...al....iiin, ..IIIIIIIIIIZZ' . El .074.=,g.4. vit.: „...- „2.7:pv's'-- iiiii:ZZ11,0&_ EL Ill ,le II .�.us. — ,� !�r____,,,,....,'— y.:,=- ` _ ide, ... 1 ate■ ► .._ -- t. - .� ...,„. MN im IIIIIII u+ 4Ems ii1 1 t!` it;rot. ,:iii as :'�..\ �, .... � •..-■�m ■r_ �k1 COj Tih�ln4w1 ip [ic�'''j e= CT!�I iEi Ja- ."•-. i- \i==qu rr ■■n. gam.■: h►-■�a !a':::=�i- li• C :..= •.., .,aalM I. jIIM==�s Yurar ;jn.1t :...:...: ■ rf ( � 1 •j;::"-- '_ �': � it E Egg; v ra6[i 1:;,v„\r i ■dry c :i IT.140,,,ine�� i:.:.1■- 1 /i Fez - ,_.... - .....`. �I II [ NIMI ^ �.. �tl, t� ��N,'eta ' ■■.� �Ima ■• _„ge n■ I,FYt�r 7.c3-s[IUu 1, .nSc v.rK a/� 111..E i ■ 11'.� �_ II II ''lIllIflll! ) . z� is i;;.. .: •C` �• / y a ,�T/tR * r- i5 fir .II'lllllJl!!`^=a�illimm �`; �dni_a s.µ-il; �i 1 ��� a��� ut'Ilk.. mr•c. .,le mall rz Q+0 0 1 !l� ■ =i t.J.iu..J... �� .r �a r�n. = �Il!'il ._�tiz ,.7r4?=t1... � ' Ili : ....Hi_ 1 lyt L_ um; im a� Min i r �1111.41 _ ■ iii..u[.r'r�■ q:'�_GL�GL.;' ctttiEll ii. = r•..i�., -l..Y .�.'•!' ' .mu.� , r- ,._. 'I 1::::NtivisT:EaryfAis,,,t,„Apv,.. Itr,,.---....,...fir.'• :diitilill .4: El.`,:t id++. - ..m■► III! i t[ ..:w. 1.m 111i ffili . ip,ml ea_A_inl II40IM1VP.1111.°1 ill ,.1 lila .. ' _ Niel, p , , a i rc t:t:I. I 1-# �i, 1 N w 'g `►7 S LSERVICE AREA FOR WATER IMPACT FEES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PLATE 2 • •••••=,,Ara MI IIIM M Me I L., L_AA Duthlakc 11.1111111111111.4 ., .__, , • Ifta _I .--_•_„, ,. ......„, .__.. ., •..,..,, .I .+— 6 ::.., - "-, 11100.• --' ..: . ,1 1 ,.... . ."-•-07-11n, a.. ...- . ....-... 1 i L.., --, . : ,f 1 El . . r\ ::: . \1 ----'12",_D'-'4=--14 2 .i r 1 mi i r'--*,•'• -, .,..":•-z„.„•:-..2......L. /... , ...„.„.--^. :,1. ^ , atilt . III I s=-i - -7'.... 11111i- ••:-... I '''' . - • All M: iv,,,- •— , ____----, , • rik- "TV 21. \1 ) Auk* ii Usikeiea- \ at ' •-. ii,Q;aYs -7,-...,_ -,-- •\' 1 • / • u.....,, • .1 ‘, -, . 1 -' t. ' i_ 11 ...- ""•z----L-------%---1- )/--7- ilk MI- 1.1t3tar-_'-,';---- _......, "re fr:7111 li WI ;Miir i — a - 1..-.40h. lin....air!,.... ....,__ E4 wein.-.0p::,,,_ fil - - , , ..., _ .. .I; Eitriaris . . , ...„_. . ._ tall u -I " I. ,i;Alp IS mila b 1 I \ Namt ••11 ahl•O II a plEN -Tall ..,ILA Et -N il i uz..,.. ....7. Iiiiii, --'---..=-, -11.11 is AAA gm. la . , lliti.ii; ..! \ 1 IIIi _maw it Ili VIEW•.:a OEM 'V — ranic-m.:::Ill 11116/11. rffiNI siltiiti2-mpi, .........vm..,UMW& albJli =LIIIII8V477470.1.0. argiaarVii FigICII _. 1111111111111111".111.11 al ig MEIIIIII "K MMINI.....41.411;e:If#44iirFj 11411,117' ' II:411 •,,, IMA*V14117 II1= 4•.10,. , itrig-:MILIZO; • ki 4p11%Mik. I IIII -We'!3•R .,i,,,::::'-7.? --..k-', linwEvatirmil - 4_,...4...• •ii ;,...v.-.:,,ishoh 0,- MOM 11-INN -11.1•1-14 NM; EiL...L'f.o:Firij-- ralrilllnir F. iiiU=1.11611.anigkil . = 114.11491V1171711 71-M11.2 2="r"eid"Thr ;•:,':.::: :". Le :.... 00,....r.‘,..... %ma 7.111P1b2ii-111 mr.OF.:11111541.1imi .-4:-.':‘_:71,4 '• ix,,e6.' ME111111111Mi!?Z'o.okt.......MN --!••• .. ill! . ,,. . ILNI--- -11•• Ills 0 `,..,,,-:.":. .,.,_.. .Mtn itlaff7V"IIIIIII 111341910U i i _ •Mini vik-thottS1•11, . -.= . • -.2,, Y'':Li ! 71 III II iliq jlio{41 of '• idiMitc:P vir•...0= .• :iettri-'tml;11=411=a. ii*Z11;;:ria3;:r. ..,....,.. ,.,... :: .. 74 Inn nillIPIP,o4"1 ..,,:::_,:•;':= 4"1 Lir` • 1111. 1. i OtagaZE-.941 . . . . ... i.fiil nelleall• .1..11111110•11111111. •,::Oil; 1 I 1:5,40$1,e1i111 I.X.alikl, AlQ. illth,Vigi 1..... -= i ......11,1ir.""i:"V• ..gie IMILII hill. I "17--....- ---“-- ".". hatra'a au 4.1-=''"%ct:11•14'''Ir:V.,:'—' tz_.i.-In al... •in.aim re .......Tim . .,:,,.. .:,.,.,. ,,..,„........„,„.„.,...,..,..._,...... „.„-....„ 4...; ,--- - • ,_ • _:.• _ ....5 .-- iiiviiiiitip---= _:„,,,,...-..s.,,,.....?,,,,....-- NM- :.E. 4114m.iiii•11 I\`‘.1.4. a,..w....42= ..„..„ ...,a1.,:?...z,,,,z,),,,..„1. sat . --lnii*.*1rAw.... LI 11%4 == :pi 1 irindMI••sf..;IE.F.-. ii am miii.-.-2 -4,,,„ ,;E f 1A•34,4 iiip C ..,,,..• 11144 feri :ire'.:,. 'it =4- a tistgai, 11 1.41ffs--1111111111 I 1,4 F.A. 1,,\,,....::;:;;;,;:ei t”...;:i:..5;10:746...ti him iv.... 1.„..,,,,,,...,, ,,..,..: • ..... .. -...., Ai FL:. 11 I I iii 4-1-:jj'IlkiLillMatrifiLl • '1=n! nmitf.V...q11,4ta SP.• Iiim.c. •.4 li 1.11111111filliMINVII ,Iii.:IP..,,"4.176.14-7, irti's-1111.11111.151111 111.1111 11.,__M ilgilfAilidalliffltfVf i 7.7=. 2,.11:...lra isa zic t •;;;:t;%-v....:,.;; 2 i*.:"Irr-r 2'1: r.--,.. - w. . .. ..,,:„,.. Ei rll virgii',44,14,1,11:1,1.2. .16wAlftiii7.-,_ .11'a idm,==::•:.;:;*--;;.,.: wAirs.'01%.2„111 =..iii...,..._,.1 . zrapill ral I IIIIII F" LM\ WAN ..•.!LXI:4:? - ilrillinlillI111.11'; -I -- .tilea ... —sorts Erl!!_41 MI b ma-me •-7::::;;?_"' =OM fir No MR I! El • lizmillioN :-,-;'3.4). MO:::.-112,HI,V,;'1 1: Ili I 11111."'ail i•on-1 -11:7!..—„, l..,. :'.- —..:Iumems,:„.•0.g:.=,. ,[;,. MEM .: milt ailr . .1 iNil i ,,, .1678:•"•;IEF......e - I Ey..-...°•..---'•."..; :4..;7,.;:-^-. ,---•--Ell sr ,....,. ...,.....2,1,..s.::. „..„..,. ,:.....47. .t . ....................... 1 ..... ,. :fp. . 1 _.,.....1 ,,eiai, t,„,4,,,,,,..,. t IllarAl ilia .., .4.11 ai.,,, 2 _ :,..-11 4.... ,,il a!,..m . ' Ili .' -- .1,4%,.. -ge4.11,5 tic.twAtni..:.....:-.61- ,. ff't . F.:7P-' AWE .1 =:.,-i, LI t•it;N. -,...4...s--Orite...".... -,,,12;v74-:".P....... ..."1 ii.9 W. "'A- 3.. -": plid AWE-ii..::'.i: .vt/ - 11...-4'...•44::,' F';': za •k 7 •••.:.f. 'w.1 ----,- ArnAliniallill 1 '71. , ............. ma I al.1..jamail 41.0 ill _ . 1:%:.:'•;'1:;,5.7,i, =‘ 41 Ai - k.f,g.....,,,,t,... IZ,Alj1:. ti !AEI pi -1> , ' 1 .- 41.0,4119111P •1 7401, ' • . a 111. wi ill. i,_. . -1 ill PI7 ill V i . . :Ig N et% W I til V S UERVICE AREA FOR WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES h.s.iie CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PLATE 3 Ill. BASE DATA Lle This section documents historical growth trends and base data for the City. This "benchmark" information provides a starting basis of 1995 data for the 10 year growth assumptions in the following section. One method of predicting future growth is looking at past growth. The historical growth rate for Southlake is shown below: TABLE 1 Annual Southlake % Change % Change 1960* 1,023 --- --- 1970* 2,031 98.5 7.1 1980* 2,808 38.3 3.3 1990* 7,083 152.2 9.7 1995** 12,750 80.0 (5 yr. 12.6 increment) * Source: U.S. Census **Source: NCTCOG January 1, 1995 (Imre Another comparison and useful base data source for population growth is the past trends in residential construction. Table 2 shows the trend in residential building permits over the last ten years. TABLE 2 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Year Single-Family 1985 212 1986 72 1987 33 1988 56 1989 51 1990 176 1991 197 1992 377 1993 517 1994 577 Total 2,268 (Be Average/Year = 226.8 (1985-1994 Average/Year = 368.8 (1990-1994) 7 For the purposes of documenting changes in population, land use, density, and intensity, the data L, format to be used as a basis to formulate the land use assumptions will be principally population and employment. By taking a "snapshot" of existing land uses and considering the Master Plans of individual cities, NCTCOG has established population and employment estimates and projections for all cities in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. These estimates from NCTCOG were used as a basis for the projections for Southlake. 1. Population - The difference between the total of the NCTCOG 1990 population estimates by TSZ and the overall NCTCOG 1995 population estimate was allocated proportionally to individual TSZ's based on the proportional number of building permits issued by TSZ since 1990. (Southlakes's Community Development department maintains a summary of residential development indicating number of planned lots, platted lots, building permits issued and available lots by subdivision.) The 1995 population estimates by TSZ can be found in Appendix A. 2. Employment - The values for the 1995 employment by TSZ were deduced by a two step process. First, preliminary 1995 estimates by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for each TSZ were obtained by interpolating between the NCTCOG 1990 and 2010 employment estimates. Second, these values were compared to changes of zoning to nonresidential categories since 1990 -the date of the last available data from NCTCOG -to determine if the interpolation resulted in"under counts" and "over counts" by TSZ and/or SIC code versus the actual development in Southlake. As a result, the employment values were then adjusted upward to reflect major additional employment-retail development,new and expanded public schools,and the City of Southlake itself-and adjusted downward where development has not occurred. The 1995 employment estimates by TSZ can be found in Appendix B. The following table is a summary of the 1995 employment for the impact fee areas as a whole. TABLE 3 EXISTING EMPLOYMENT - 1995 1995 Basic Employment* 2,928 1995 Retail Employment* 179 1995 Service Employment* 689 1995 Total Employment* 3,796 *Source: NCTCOG (adjusted to January 1995) Prior to an evaluation and projection of future land use patterns, a thorough understanding of existing conditions is essential. A documentation of existing land use patterns was made and used as a base line for future growth projections. This also documents the present physical composition and condition of the City. 8 To obtain accurate information on existing conditions, the existing land use inventory that was Lire included in the land use assumption report prepared in June, 1993, was updated by the city staff to January, 1995, based on zoning changes during that period. In this inventory, the City was classified according to the following land use categories: Residential Single-Family Multi-Family Commercial Industrial Public/Quasi-Public Corps of Engineers Property Vacant Each of the above categories was counted and tabulated on a parcel-by-parcel basis and recorded for all areas of the City. Table 4 shows a summary of existing land uses for the area in Southlake's City Limits. TABLE 4 EXISTING LAND USE - 1995 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Percent of Acres Per (re Existina Land Use Acres Used') Total Area 100 Persons* Single-Family 4,324 31.0 33.9 Multi-Family, Duplex or Group Quarters 13 0.1 0.1 Commercial 138 1.0 1.1 Public/Quasi-Public 368 2.6 2.9 Industrial 350 2.5 2.8 Corps of Engineers Property 759 5.5 6.0 Total Developed Area 5,952 42.7 46.8 Vacant Land 7.976, 57.3 Total Area(2) 13,928 100.0% Source: City of Southlake, Community Development Department * Based on population of 12,750 (')Gross acres, includes street and alley rights-of-way Excludes Lake Grapevine 9 IV. TEN-YEAR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS Growth is characterized in two forms: population (residential) and employment (nonresidential land use). Several assumptions were necessary to arrive at reasonable growth rates for population and employment. The following assumptions have been made as a basis from which ten-year projections could be initiated. 1. Future land uses will occur as identified on the 1993 Future Land Use Plan 2. The City will be able to finance the necessary improvements to water, sewer and roadways to accommodate growth 3. School facilities will accommodate increases in population 4. Densities will be as projected based on anticipated zoning districts consistent with the 1993 Future Land Use Plan. 5. Known or anticipated development projects 6. Data received and used from the NCTCOG is generally accepted as the best available data. The ten-year projections or land use assumptions are based upon the policies established in the Future Land Use Plan and the establishment of a reasonable growth rate based on past trends. (bre Considering the historical issuance of residential building permits (Table 2) and the historical development and subsequent absorption of lots within residential subdivisions, the anticipated growth rate the next 10 years is that which results from 400 residential building permits per year. For the last two years,the number of residential building permits issued has exceeded this amount. Using this growth rate, a population of approximately 25,000 was projected for the ten-year growth projection. This rate would generate a population of about 1,200 persons per year. The following shows the formula for calculating the ten-year growth assumptions: 400 dwelling units X 0.934 occupancy rate = 374 occupied dwelling units/year 374 occupied dwelling units/year X 3.322 household size = 1,241 persons/year 1,241 persons/year X 10 years = 12,410 persons growth 12,750 existing population + 12,410 growth = 25,160 population in ten years All projections and estimates are for January 1 of their respective years. This rate,which represents an approximate 7 percent compounded average annual growth rate, was determined to be a reasonable rate at which Southlake could be expected to grow. The annual growth rate from 1980 to 1990 was 9.7% and the rate for 1990-95 was higher at 12.6%, but 7 percent corresponds more L 10 closely with NCTCOG projections. This rate, although slightly higher than the NCTCOG rate of 5.2 percent resulting in a population projection of 21,516 for the year 20052, is a conservative growth rate. The 2005 population estimate of 25,160 was allocated by assigning the increase in households to TSZ's based on known or anticipated residential development. Then the total households were multiplied by the average household size to arrive at a population by TSZ. Starting with the adjusted 1995 employment totals, the ten-year employment projections were derived by prorating the NCTCOG 20-year (2010) projections equally for each year (approximately 307 employees per year).3 Each 2005 employment estimate by TSZ was reviewed by the city staff and revised, if necessary, to reflect known or anticipated employment. Employment values were adjusted upward to reflect the additional employment centers, such as schools and City Hall, not accounted for by NCTCOG, and values were adjusted downward where residential development since 1990 has reduced the land available for employment - generating land uses. Appendices "A" and "B" show the ten-year growth projections for population and employment for each TSZ. Tables 5A and 5B show a summary of the population and employment projections for (re Southlake. 2The NCTCOG population projection for Southlake for 2010 is 26,333; if the increase is distributed equally each year, the projected growth in 2005 would be 21,516. 31990 NCTCOG employment, 3,473; 2010 NCTCOG employment, 9,613; 307 employees X 15 years = 4,605 + 3,473 = 8,078 rounded to 8,100 employees. (Ire 11 TABLE 5A (tori TEN-YEAR POPULATION PROJECTIONS - SOUTHLAKE 1995 2005 Roadway Units Population Units Population Service Areas 1 110 349 330 1,023 2 330 1,112 700 2,173 3 1,178 3,618 1,782 5,528 4 726 2,290 1,444 4,481 5 300 929 650 2,017 6 475 1,360 1,478 4,584 7 732 2,304 1,125 3,491 8 257 785 599 1.860 Total 4,108 12,747 ° . . 8,108 TABLE 5B TEN-YEAR EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS - SOUTHLAKE Le' 1995 2005 Basic 2,928 6,240 Retail 179 743 Service - 689 1.117 Total 3,796 8,100 Changes in population and employment affect the use of land. In the case of Southlake, increased population and employment is due to the conversion of agricultural land into residential and other land uses. These land use changes aid in the determination of demand for additional water, wastewater and roadway facilities. Table 6 shows the projected land use requirements for a population of 25,000. Residential densities were calculated based upon permitted densities in the City's Zoning Ordinance. "These represent actual values. The differences between these values and those corresponding values previously mentioned can be attributed to "rounding." 12 TABLE 6 L PROJECTED TEN-YEAR FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Future Acres Acres Required Per for Land Use Cateaory 100 Persons 25,000 People Single-Family 28.3 7,075 Multi-Family 0.1 25 Commercial 1.1 275 Public/Quasi-Public 2.0 500 Industrial 2.0 500 Corps of Engineers Property N/A 759 Total 9,134 V. ULTIMATE PROJECTIONS An ultimate or holding capacity land use and population projection was also established. First, known densities of development were considered. Then, based on the remaining developable vacant land in Southlake, densities as recommended in the Future Land Use Plan and densities of (hareanticipated development projects were applied. The ultimate population of the City of Southlake is a function of residential land use area (acres), housing density (dwelling units per acre), and population density (persons per dwelling unit). Based on the land uses identified on the Land Use Plan, the total ultimate land use areas of low density single-family housing, medium density single- family housing, and multi-family housing is known. The area of each residential classification was multiplied by its respective housing density and population density,and the products were summed to obtain the ultimate population. Housing density values are from observed existing residential development and/or current residential zoning regulations. The following table shows the acres required for a population of 45,660. The holding capacity of 45,660 persons and land use is based on the Future Land Use Plan and the following assumptions: 1. Mixed Use category was allocated among Single-Family (10%), Multi-Family (2%) and Commercial Categories (88%). 2. Low Density and Medium Density Residential categories were allocated to the Single-Family category. (spe 13 3. Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories were allocated to the Public/Quasi-Public category. TABLE 7 ULTIMATE FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Acreage at Land Use Category Build-Out Residential (Low Density) 4,781 Residential (Medium Density) 4,381 Mixed Use (Residential) 322 Public and Semi-Public 647 Park and Open Space 216 Commercial 2,356 Industrial 466 Corps Property 759 Total 13,928 VI. SUMMARY The data used to compile these land use assumptions were from two sources—the Comprehensive (bre Plan (Future Land Use Plan) for the City of Southlake and the North Central Texas Council of Governments(NCTCOG)data base used for traffic modeling purposes. The existing base data was prepared by the City of Southlake's Community Development department and information from the U.S.Census. The ten-year growth projections were calculated based upon reasonable growth rates and trends based on the Future Land Use Plan. NCTCOG projections for population and employment were used for comparison. The NCTCOG data was utilized principally to compile employment projections by TSZ for roadway impact fees. Ultimate projections were based on the holding capacity of vacant land using land use types as shown on the Future Land Use Plan and applying densities as established by development policies in the Plan and known proposed development plans. The land use assumptions may be summarized as follows: ■ Southlake presently contains approximately 21.5 square miles within the City Limits of which 42.7% is developed. It is not anticipated Southlake will be able to expand its municipal boundaries beyond its present limits. (Ihre 14 • Existing population of Southlake in 1995 - 12,750 •Lire A compounded annual growth rate of approximately 7% was used to calculate the Southlake 10-year growth projections. • The ten-year growth projection for Southlake is 25,157 or about 25,000. • The ultimate population of Southlake is approximately 45,660. L (har' 15 L APPENDICES L (lire 16 DATA FORMAT L The LUA database (appendices A and B), as well as future projections were formulated according to the following format and categories: Appendix A - Population Roadway Service Area - Correlates to the roadway service areas identified on Plate 1. 1995 Dwelling Units - Total number of all living units including single-family, duplex, multi- family, and group quarters. The number of existing housing units has been shown for the base year (January, 1995). 1995 Households - The adjusted number of households (Section II - Base Data). 1995 Population - The adjusted population (Section III). 2005 Dwelling Units - Projected housing units by service area for the year 2005 (ten-year growth projections). 2005 Households - The projected number of households (Section IV). 2005 Population - The projected population obtained by adding the projected increase to the 1995 population (Section IV). kire Traffic Survey Zone/TSZ - Traffic survey zones previously established by NCTCOG and the Highway Department used for data collection purposes and termed TSZs in this report. Appendix B - Employment Roadway Service Area - Correlates to the roadway service areas identified on Plate 1. Three classifications were used for employment and compiled for each roadway service area: 1995 Basic BASIC (SIC Code # 1000 to 5199) - 1995 land use activities that produce goods and services such as those exported outside the local economy; manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. 1995 Retail RETAIL (SIC Code # 5200 to 5999) - 1995 land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented to household sector such as grocery stores, restaurants, etc. 1995 Service SERVICE (SIC Code # 6000 to 9999) - 1995 land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as financial, insurance,government,and other professional administrative offices. (hare 1995 Total Employment The 1995 total of the Basic, Retail and Service categories 2005 Basic BASIC (SIC Code # 1000 to 5199) - 2005 land use activities that produce goods and services such as those exported outside the local economy; manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. 2005 Retail RETAIL (SIC Code # 5200 to 5999) -2005 land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented to household sector such as grocery stores, restaurants, etc. 2005 Service SERVICE (SIC Code # 6000 to 9999) - 2005 land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as financial, insurance,government,and other professional administrative offices. 2005 Total Employment The 2005 total of the Basic, Retail and Service categories Traffic Survey Zone/TSZ - Traffic survey zones previously established by NCTCOG and the Highway Department used for data collection purposes and termed TSZs in this report. (re L APPENDIX A 10-YEAR POPULATION PROJECTIONS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE (bur Roadway 1995 1995 1995 2005 2005 2005 Traffic Sur- Service Area Dwelling Households Population Dwelling Households Population vey Zone Units Units 1 108 103 345 327 305 1;013 9200 1 2 2 4 3 3 : 10 9219 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14036 Sub-total 110 105 349 330 308 1,023 2 4 4 : 6 4 4 i' 13 8330 2 72 68 215 134 125 415 8450 2 248 261 874 453 423 1•405 8451 2 2 2 5 18 17 57 8454 2 4 4 12 91 85 283 8492 total 330 339 1;112 700 654 2173 3 5 5 14 7 7 23 8441 3 632 555 1,887 980 915 3,040 8456 3 490 466 1,584 744 695 2309 8457 3 11 10 24 11 10 33 8493 3 40 38 109 40 37 123 19017 Sub-total 1,178 1,074 3,618 1,782 1,664 5,528 4 87 83 269 108 101 336 8324 4 144 137 458 327 305 1 013 8452 4 57 54 163 124 116 385 8453 1;219 699 653 2<1 4 383 364 69 8464 4 2 2 6 2 2 7 8465 4 0 0 0 3 3 10 8466 --(hipe 4 45 43 144 145 135 448 8467 4 8 8 - 31 36 34 113 8468 ............... ..... . ....... . Sub-total 726 691 -2,290 1,444 1,349 4,481 Roadway 1995 1995 1995 2005 2005 2005 Traffic Sur- Service Area Dwelling Households Population €! Dwelling Households Population vey Zone • • ill.", Units • Units 5 106 101 3 3$.._ _ 236 220 731 ., 8320 .................................... .................................... ................... ................ ................................... .................................... 5 22 21 46 15 14 47 8322 5 114 108 361 181 169 561 8323 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 8335 5 58 55 184 218 204 678 8469 Sub-total 300 285 929 650 607 2,017 6 288 229 767 848 792 2631 8470 6 187 177 '593 630 588 1953 8482 Sub-total 475 406 1,360 1,478 1,380 4 584 7 32 30 77 • 73 68 226 8460 7 547 520 1742 834 779 2588 8461 7 153 145 485 218 204 677 19019 100. otal 732 695 2 304 1,125 1,051 3 491 8 67 64 184 127 119 :395 8458 8 150 140 473 254 237 787 8497 8 40 38 128 218 204 678 8500 Sub-total 257 242 785 599 560 1.860 Total(1) 4,108 _ 3,837 12,747 8,108(2) 7,573 25:157 (1)4108 X 0.934 occupancy rate = 3,837 X 3.322 persons per household = 12,747 914,108 existing dwelling units plus 4,000 future dwelling units = 8,108 X 0.934 = 7,573 X 3.322 = 25,157 L APPENDIX B 10-YEAR EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE .----(hipe ort : ,;:o,':,0.'-..':: Roadway 1995 1995 1995 1995 2005 2005 2005 2005s Traffic • Service Basic Retail Service .Total.: Basic Retail Service Total' Survey Area Emp. Emp . : Zone 1 22 0 0 22 25 0 9 34 > 9200 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9219 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 14036 Sub-total 22 0 0 22 25 0 9 34 2 0 0 0 : 0 3 1 0 4 8330 2 0 0 0 0 25 2 3 30 8450 2 20 15 82 117 97 18 91 206 8451 2 0 0 4 4 39 11 8 58 8454 2 2,202 17 0 2,219 2,685 90 25 2,800 8492 Sub- tal 2,222 32 86 2340 2,849 122 127 : ;3,098 3 363 2 0 365 387 2 1 390: 8441 3 0 0 0 0 650 10 40 700 8456 3 0 17 0 17 96 21 11 128 8457 3 0 0 0 0 157 15 6 i 178: 8493 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 : 19017 382 i 1,294 48 58 1,400 Sub-total 363 19 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 8324 4 0 6 41 47 67 9 49 125 8452 4 1 0 22 23 58 43 29 130 8453 4 5 1 1 < 7 69 17 4 90> 8465 4 0 0 0 0 26 4 3 33 8466 4 55 20 65 ',':'']::-.140 355 40 70 E 227 15 100 : 8464 ............................. Sub-total 61 42 264 367 903 133 296 `1 332 Roadway 1995 1995 1995 11995 2005 2005 2005 2005 Traffic Service Basic Retail Service Total Basic Retail Service Total Survey 4=(lo (s) Emp. Emp. Zone 223 3 12 238 490 90 20 ;;;: 600.;:: 8320 5 11 11 25 47 25 100 225 350 '.E::::, 8322 5 0 26 0 `'26 14 45 17 76 8323 0 5 0 0 50 5 0 0 75 75 8335 5 17 4 33 54 200 9 41 250 8469 Sub-total 251 44 120 415 729 244 378 i 1,351; 6 0 2 4 6 79 8 13 100 8470 6 5 4 31 40 63 8 3 74 8482 Sub-total 5 6 35 :46 142 16 16 174 7 0 34 0 134 25 150 25 200 8460 i 60 130 6 14 7 0 0 60 150' 8461 7 0 0 30 30 8 1 1 10 19019 Suu I 0 34 90 124 163 157 40 360 8 0 0 60 >60 18 1 156 175 8458 8 0 0 0 0 49 2 5 56 8497 8 4 2 34 40 68 20 32 120 8500 Sub-total 4 2 94 s1'00 135 23 193 351 Total 2,928 179 689 3,796 6,240 743 1,117 8,100 L L GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS L 1. Advisory Committee means the capital improvements advisory committee established by (hr, the City for purposes of reviewing and making recommendations to the City Council on adoption and amendment of the City's impact fee program. 2. Area-related facility means a capital improvement or facility expansion which is designated in the impact fee capital improvements plan and which is not a site-related facility. Area- related facility may include a capital improvement which is located offsite, or within or on the perimeter of the development site. 3. Assessment means the determination of the amount of the maximum impact fee per service unit which can be imposed on new development. 4. Capital improvement means either a roadway facility,a water facility or a wastewater facility, with a life expectancy of three or more years, to be owned and operated by or on behalf of the City. 5. City means the City of Southlake, Texas. 6. Credit means the amount of the reduction of an impact fee due, determined under this ordinance or pursuant to administrative guidelines,that is equal to the value of area-related facilities provided by a property owner pursuant to the City's subdivision or zoning regulations or requirements, for the same type of facility. 7. Facility expansion means either a roadway facility expansion, a water facility expansion or a sewer facility expansion. 8. Final plat approval means the point at which the applicant has complied with all conditions of approval in accordance with the City's subdivision regulations and the plat has been approved for filing with Tarrant or Denton County. 9. Impact fee means either a fee for roadway facilities, a fee for water facilities or a fee for wastewater facilities imposed on new development by the City pursuant to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code in order to generate revenue to fund or recoup the costs of capital improvements or facility expansion necessitated by and attributable to such new development. Impact fees do not include the dedication of rights-of-way or easements for such facilities, or the construction of such improvements, imposed pursuant to the City's zoning or subdivision regulations. 10. Impact fee capital improvements plan means either a roadway capital improvements plan, a water capital improvements plan or a wastewater capital improvements plan adopted or revised pursuant to these impact fee regulations. A - 1 11. Land use assumptions means the projections of population and employment growth and Lar associated changes in land uses, densities and intensities, over at least a ten-year period, adopted by the City, as may be amended from time to time, upon which the capital improvements plans are based. 12. Land use equivalency table means a table converting the demands for capital improvements generated by various land uses to numbers of service units, as may be amended from time to time. 13. New development means the subdivision of land; the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment,conversion,structural alteration,relocation,or enlargement of any structure; or any use or extension of the use of land; any of which increases the number of service units. 14. Plat has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Plat includes replat. 15. Platting has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Platting includes replattinq. 16. Property owner has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Property owner includes the developer for the new development. (Iry 17. Recoupment means the imposition of an impact fee to reimburse the City for capital improvements which the City has previously oversized to serve new development. 18. Roadway means any freeway, expressway, principal or minor arterial or collector roadways designated in the City's adopted Thoroughfare Plan,as may be amended from time to time. Roadway does not include any roadway designated as a numbered highway on the official federal or Texas highway system. 19. Roadway capital improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the roadway facilities or roadway expansions and their costs for each road service area, which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 20. Roadway expansion means the expansion of the capacity of an existing roadway in the City, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing roadway to better serve existing development. 21. Roadway facility means an improvement or appurtenance to a roadway which includes, but is not limited to, rights-of-way, whether conveyed by deed or easement; intersection improvements; traffic signals; turn lanes; drainage facilities associated with the roadway; A - 2 street lighting or curbs. 22. Service area means either a roadway service area, a water service area or wastewater benefit area within the City, within which impact fees for capital improvements or facility expansion will be collected for new development occurring within such area and within which fees so collected will be expended for those types of improvements or expansions identified in the type of capital improvements plan applicable to the service area. 23. Service unit means the applicable standard units of measure shown on the land use equivalency table in the Impact Fees Capital Improvements Plan which can be converted to vehicle miles in p.m. peak hour, for roadway facilities, or one inch (1") water meter equivalents,for water or for wastewater facilities,which serves as the standardized measure of consumption, use or generation attributable to the new unit of development. 24. Site-related facility means an improvement or facility which is for the primary use or benefit of a new development and/or which is for the primary purpose of safe and adequate provision of roadway, water or wastewater facilities to serve the new development, and which is not included in the impact fees capital improvements plan and for which the property owner is solely responsible under subdivision or other applicable development regulations. 25. Utility connection means installation of a water meter for connecting a new development to the City's water system, or connection to the City's wastewater system. 26. Wastewater facility means a wastewater interceptor or main, lift station or other facility included within and comprising an integral component of the City's collection system for wastewater. Wastewater facility includes land, easements or structure associated with such facilities. Wastewater facility excluded a site-related facility. 27. Wastewater facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing wastewater improvement for the purpose of serving new development, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing sewer facility to serve existing development. 28. Wastewater capital improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the wastewater facilities or wastewater expansions and their associated costs which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 29. Water facility means a water interceptor or main, pump station, storage tank or other facility included within the comprising an integral component of the City's water storage or distribution system. Water facility includes land, easements or structures associated with such facilities. Water facility excludes site-related facilities. A - 3 • 30. Water facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing water facility for the purpose of serving new development, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing water improvement to serve existing develop- ment. 31. Water improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the water facilities or water expansions and their associated costs which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 32. Water meter means a device for measuring the flow of water to a development,whether for domestic or for irrigation purposes. L A - 4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tom Elgin, Planner SUBJECT: Resolution No. 95-45 -Adoption of Land Use Assumptions (LUA) for Impact Fees Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code states that the City Council shall"...adopt or reject an ordinance, order, or resolution approving the land use assumptions"within thirty (30) days of the public hearing on the land use assumptions. Attached is Resolution No. 95-45 for the adoption of Land Use Assumptions for Impact Fees. Please place this on item on the next Council agenda for their consideration. TE G:IWPFIMEMOISTAFFICEHILUA RES.WPD RESOLUTION 95-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS TO BE USED TO (1100" DEVELOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS PURSUANT TO WHICH WATER, WASTEWATER AND ROADWAY IMPACT FEES MAY BE IMPOSED. WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Southlake has appointed an Advisory Committee, as per the provisions of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, to guide the update of planning, land use, capital improvements plans, and impact fee information for the existing and future water and wastewater utilities, and the development of planning, land use, capital improvements plans, and impact fee information for the existing and future roadway facilities; and, WHEREAS, this advisory information ultimately will be used by the City of Southlake in its evaluation and consideration of impact fee ordinances; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake called for a public hearing at this regularly scheduled session of November 7, 1995, to seek public comment on the proposed land use assumptions and the general nature of the proposed capital improvements; and, WHEREAS, the City of Southlake made requisite public notice of such public hearing for three consecutive weeks in a general circulation local newspaper, the first such notice appearing at least thirty-one(31)days in advance of the proposed hearing date; and, WHEREAS, the City of Southlake made publicly available on or before the date of the first publication of the notice various information concerning.the public hearing issues; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has received public testimony on November 7, 1995, from the general public, now, (solaEEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE hereby adopts the ched land use assumptions which will be used to develop capital improvements plans,-pursuant to which water, wastewater, and roadway fees may be imposed under the provisions of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Litey, Attorney of Southlake, Texas City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-101, Site Plan/R.S.U. Building Addition REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for R.S.U.Building Addition,being Lot 1,Block 1,Woodland Hills R.S.U. Addition LOCATION: North side of West Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709), approximately 1300' West of White Chapel Blvd. OWNER/APPLICANT: GTE Southwest Incorporated CURRENT ZONING: "CS" Community Service District LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public NO.NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P&Z ACTION: October 19, 1995;Approved(7-0),ZA95-101, Site Plan for R.S.U. Building Addition, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 1995,permitting parking in the bufferyard as shown. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated November 3, 1995. Currently,the existing facility is an unmanned remote switching unit(RSU), and Staff understands that this status will continue. The proposed expansion is to house additional equipment. KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-101 SP.I CC 8A-1 -I SB2I ' 4G�oU�1i . b� R�' � z l; f tac"`ii ANY BKI—A. prr1oN ' 9UP,V _� ` A J .�=1 I�.A..=, 1 q - i53 Ac " 3A4 B{AA 81 BA BAIT BA16 BA JBABAI BA12 8 834`: 1 EI i - .. 1K it( 6A6 6 A !. 6A5 S" A 8 1 / /�- A 1 1 2 B83 \ s / A II' LY + BA,s ABA, " �,�. A SEM , MILT: • • BA9 BA BAto m, �; inQ npA I 11C2 11 BA1 9" 1 BB18 ' 1 I 1 t� 1 , IIIf 98 t0 •: , 1 1 , q.'..IS DI '.:'' ' . c r , 3s A< � f!1{i�+'1'` _1 - r A-661 MIU 1 1 1 t n �._.'y y _ ITV ' 11A2A 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I T •'1— - i ; 1 ski 1 1IA2 1 r ) r'Lr.ti-'f .1 - 7-•-.1 ' • '4.,t - 7- 1 V ; ' ' k! _ ' k _ i 1 1 [,K, •-- / OAP-: __i_._. 4' • •t,...y.,. \ '—�•�':::1: -‹ li.• !-rTf1'17 . ` -- 34 .11i 1 -- -+- --1-.- 4• i 1 1 . , hj pp �' -r'� -• __ !��,-�•'. 2C , I 1• 1 ri t 1 1 1 ` \`�,i. T--1 o- _--- ��' 1• .- ►>•::... Lr.•.D -.4 - MIA I I i 1 -- i ; ' +1 I v- . . 1 •.Li LITTLE_ R E_k�; Y '-ALL N NN1AL I I i 1 `v- ,- ; , 1 3AA 34 MIA Kr A-666 3�T 81•� PARK 1 : 1 . 1 , 1 1 1 a514'' ' 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 CI a cr, ��� 1 1 1 1 1 - Sac 3e1B ' ri IIA�' - -- 1 1 - ma .,_ . , , _.:.,,..,,,, _ , ...: . 9437 -. :810.0 'AL. it.....-: _�it t• .. ?� -•�.. r _ r 2' 1 3C2 SOSGI 382 334 1 Illiki._ .9.-. • i u _i-b� /\ , /Alp all r SF SE 50 501 S02 4. x h ! ... I, _ liar• ,L j wN PAL 50a f�Y ' • .r._ Y rl 4- `< `_ .? © Ij Nppl`J w At c A< �3 A< 4.57 A< _ 2('_ 1 _ ,., "I' >3 •- - - _- -� o ME RAH . • o 4s .* . ;I:(T :) jC1 : _ isAc�' t. • _ - -+ V, 423k ,.\c •I 2A18 ileav �7 C 283C (� a 1t ,10 IF. it 41 ,t 4.5 Ae --�— S 2c2A It 4SURICY 2 AP ;A A Ae _ a in,zr ,, tr .4) %-- -,. v PIA 0 L i :-=',r ., . ,. .., -,), a _ .. . , ' '' ' ' o ,. • 1 VL(#40, artr:... %. a--- ,1 1 1 - - RI `_-h PAlll: A Ac sn1 C T T T Tt it RI 1 TRACT MAP •-,-c - ).‘ 8A-2 r. ,21✓ _'p0 T TR 1C2 TR 301.A 6.Q AC Z 11.140 LI Spin #13 Representative Rex Potter TR 1 B = 373 R - - 9.9AC p .,O TR 1C3 "AG" 4.105 AC R . City of Southlake iq „ IF/Rc/'AAIBBRA/IC El SAVINGS . ® 8804 „�— � 1ADD823. Shady Oaks Ltd. z c ' i 8s �p4 0 FM' �/'' i W. Justus •1 I(15 At, ;k - ;• F "C-2" Pf J.sJ i 1 (1113°'' State of Texas - ic,z TR2 I Ili 1.59 0 - Clardy-. ® State of Rufner I" r , ' Moor G. Lechler „0_1 „ EEN Texas 1 S 1 • 6 t. 1, ,037 w��' . 1 f Cr ` ,J5 / TR 3L I`O ..s / J 8.31 AC 1 • _ 6 '/ i N. ...--ii., 173 J ,ap 7 7 ADJACENT bWNERS TR 3N 197 ,T 3 AND ZONING 3.01 0 a 8 _ - W.w _ Igo TR 3N2 TR 3A - - —_I 8A-3 I TR 3N1 t 1 Q l Ar 1.5 0 9 � City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No.: ZA 95-101 Review No: Two Date of Review: 11/03/95 Project Name: Site Plan-G.T.E.Remote Switching Unit Building Addition.Lot 1.Block 1,Woodland Hills RSU OWNER/APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: G.T.E. Southwest. Inc.-Land&Building Div. Darrow. McSpedden. Sellars.AIA 500 East Carpenter 3115 Loop 305. Suite 100 Irving. Texas 75062 San Angelo.Texas 76904 Phone: (214) 717-2751 Phone: (915) 944-9606 Fax : (214) 717-5854 Fax : CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/23/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787.CITY 1. Include a chart showing the bufferyard planting calculations similar to the following: REQUIRED BUFFERYARDS Bufferyard Canopy Accent Width-Type Trees Trees Shrubs North-100' Required 10'--B 2 3 10 Provided ? East -150' Required 5'A 2 3 12 Provided ? ? ? ? South-100' Required 20'-O 4 3 14 Provided ? ? ? ? West-154' Required 5'-A 2 3 12 Provided ? ? ? ? See Zoning Ordinance 480-0 section 42 for bufferyard requirements and Ordinance 480-S, Corridor Overlay Zone, Section 43.9.c.3. Please note that the above bufferyard lengths should be determined by the actual property line distance minus any intersecting driveways. The allowable substitute bufferyards must meet the planting requirements of the substitute bufferyard and if the bufferyard width is doubled a 20%reduction in planting requirements made be applied. The plantings currently shown on the graphic do not appear to meet the. minimum required plantings. 8A-4 • City of Southiake,Texas 2. Show the location of an interior landscape areas to be provided on the graphic(use shading or cross hatch to distinguish)and include a chart showing the interior landscape planting calculations similar to the following: REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Canopy Accent Ground Trees Trees Shrubs Cover Area req'd= xxx s.f x x x x s.f. Area req'd= xxx s.f. x x x x s.f. The required interior landscaping required is as follows: Landscape area required = 30% of the floor area of the largest floor of the proposed new structure. Number of canopy trees required= 1/600 sf of req'd landscape area Number of accent trees required = 1/300 sf of req'd landscape area Number of shrubs required = 1/ 60 sf of req'd landscape area Square footage of ground cover = 10%of req'd landscape area 13 square feet of landscape parking islands/parking stall is required in each row of parking and is credited toward the required landscape area. See Landscape Ordinance No. 544 for interior landscape requirements and Ordinance 480-S, Corridor Overlay Zone, Section 43.9.c.3. 3. The following items are missing in the Site Data Summary : Site Data Summary Land Use Designation "Public/Semi-Public" Start Construction Month/Year Finish Construction Month/Year Existing Bldg. Area ?in Sq. Ft. Proposed Bldg. Area ?in Sq. Ft. Total Bldg. Area ?in Sq. Ft. Number of Stories ? Required Parking- Provided Parking - Standard ? Handicap ? 4. Label the Land Use Designations according to the City of Southiake approved Land Use Plan as follows: Tract to the east -L.U.D. "Mixed Use" Tracts to the south along F.M. 1709 -L.U.D. "Mixed Use" Tract to the west -L.U.D. "Medium Density Residential" Tract to the north -L.U.D. "Medium Density Residential" S. Correct the ownerships properties located on the south line of West Southiake Boulevard across from the project site. The Tract lines appear correct;However,Lot 1, Block 1, Reutlinger Addition owned by Clardy-Ruffner should be shown to the west, and the Gloria Lechler Tract, Tract No. 3C of the Hiram Granberry Survey Abst. # 581, should be shown to the east. -- _ 8A-5 City of Southlake,Texas 6. Label the location, type, and height of all walls, fences, and screening devices noting whether it is existing or proposed. 7. The air conditioning units must be fully screened from visibility from the property adjoining the north boundary line of the project site which has a Land Use Designation (L.U.D.) of"Medium Density Residential". 8. Show the location of trash dumpsters and the type and height of screening devices. * The vertical and horizontal articulation of the building required by Ordinance 480-S,Corridor Overlay Zone,does not apply,because the wall lengths of this building do not extend 3 times the wall height. * No review of the landscaping and irrigation plans is intended with this Site Plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting.the requirements of Ord. .544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit, a site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan.along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: G.T.E. Southwest, Inc.-Land& Building Div. Darrow, McSpedden, Sellars, AIA G:\WPF\REV\95\95-101 TP.WPD _- -- 8A-6 . Ci a , 1 A 1 1il � E E id - j l le 3 iii f 11111 � iII1 1 ill ! riI III II ice, 1 I 1 II i. • i R r- I Ii111 A r .s .. U 1, i . iill ? 1 . e Elm e ol :: -'''e''' : e °e e 11,i7,11i 7 Twill ! I �billi 1 I� !I, L �11; .14 I. ,, ,,„si .I � i _ ' 1 pip E lij usllih 1 . . , p e• ! Iii i ihi iiii „, 4'11141 g 1:II -4 t tIIØ -1I 1f 1 o g„ � � (iii, g . 1117 11 ( 1 --—--—--—- —--—--—--—-------—--"^-- -- II -IPi 1. " o "� . - I• : Qo / r.n.Y.ww.re ` 1 0 0 i P i '111 1 I .! i E 1 . 1 ! i 1© ilil.Itt� U i t 1 t o,i ,_---- ;I I Qfi F I J og 11 1 ..i e ....P.i►ii R i 1 Ir.. i ,i„,p.,), c (:)..c.,..„,#1 1................... , ,c-r -- _ — : . i 1j/ l 11 , , .eJ J j Irto ilr i , O I --- •—-- a-----J. 1 I ( _-. 1,,it O [1 1* it ... 1 PP fr, ; C t i ip, ___di , 7 \ : ,if ----;co I pi N 0 a I II li .�, R.S.U. BUILDING ADDITION a lap 1 y i 6_ WOODLAND HILLS ONION c i -; SOUTPLAKE. TEXAS DRS ,_...... ww — 8A-7 RESOLUTION 95-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS TO BE USED TO DEVELOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS PURSUANT TO WHICH WATER, WASTEWATER AND ROADWAY IMPACT FEES MAY BE IMPOSED. WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Southlake has appointed an Advisory Committee, as per the provisions of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, to guide the update of planning, land use, capital improvements plans, and impact fee information for the existing and future water and wastewater utilities, and the development of planning, land use, capital improvements plans, and impact fee information for the existing and future roadway facilities; and, WHEREAS, this advisory information ultimately will be used by the City of Southlake in its evaluation and consideration of impact fee ordinances; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake called for a public hearing at this regularly scheduled session of November 7, 1995, to seek public comment on the proposed land use assumptions and the general nature of the proposed capital improvements; and, WHEREAS, the City of Southlake made requisite public notice of such public hearing for three consecutive weeks in a general circulation local newspaper, the first such notice appearing at least thirty-one(31)days in advance of the proposed hearing date; and, - WHEREAS, the City of Southlake made publicly available on or before the date of the first publication of the notice various information concerning.the public hearing issues; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake has received public testimony on November 7, 1995, from the general public, now, La.EREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE hereby adopts the shed land use assumptions which will be used to develop capital improvements plans,pursuant to which water, wastewater, and roadway fees may be imposed under the provisions of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: • (11,6A),Attorney ity of Southlake, Texas City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-186,First Reading ZA 95-103,Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 0.112 acres of land situated in the S. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 525, Tract 6C, and the G.W. Main Survey No. 1098, Tract 2C1 LOCATION: Southeast corner of South Kimball Ave. and East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) OWNER: Royal Properties APPLICANT: Hodges & Associates CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Six(6) RESPONSES: One(1)written response received within the 200' notification area: • Randy Perry(Southlake Kimball Venture Ltd.), 11300 N. Central Expwy., Suite 407, Dallas, Texas 75243-6712; in favor, "It conforms to contiguous zoning and should be used as commercial property as allowed by "C-3" designation, City of Southlake." P & Z ACTION: October 19, 1995; Approved (7-0), ZA95-103, Rezoning from "AG" Agricultural District to "C-3" General Commercial District. STAFF COMMENTS: This land is a portion of the "old" S. Kimball R.O.W. prior to the new alignment. It has never been zoned. MJ KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-103Z.1 CC 8B-1 �\2A }:G tl NNE'1' en Ac SOU _~ 5ac ' "'.,, . .n ..>` +: 2A4&II Ac JN�ON tit • CS',-) /5C162 sr , ► K J IAA 2 ` j 50 f E sac3 e' v 4..1 1.- 1- ' c. ...., a1 SDIA ��/ I ' S5 — !a eo 6WIA 8,11 - T. IEAL l 5a0 5C1A'.y� - 1�: '' 6r 1 = 1. A-4eI C� ISA3AI tf 5� �� _ L Cf.- .1- i N� N �; w 5t181 • MO 5 -_= �r� ( 501 1 501 in N.A . 5�M A v • = - i f Y' SA4 _�GN, U.FI F: F MA v r 7 J c� TC OMAS—�1E�HAN 4 8481 'e' • ' *I ��F t. SURVEY A-10, �� 2A\� /sc �� ,�-_- 4A 0 yrt 2e2n zc x© M a cz,� �d{Zfi' 111116 �{ 28IA 2C1 5 5C1 , 3A2 3At yY1R sa4c a , ` ,,.`f► . .E J 1 . gas �g� ...�... ..:, x: l p�O -_.� ;yam( A. 38AM X © 0 N 20 2R 2Y .. , ; J,j _•- —1�L g ETQi9��� 2A1 2A --I-- 41 at, --- - f. 6 5 ' C-- Y v tVito 58�1 J 2A1A Gg- ,...�n A [ , Lr r SA I .3B1 183 is un 1 6 'II Kr A-4 NORTH '• 3c r IA 2Eu WEST • PKWY a•ST 2D11 2E3 2E14 2E13 • N 6 384 33 2E 2E9 2A1 `/' • 1 t 1 2E12%22E 0 1 _ 2E . 26 Yf 7 wsn,rawcc fl __ _ C, ; 5 1 L----,/. ; x 2 28 182ell -r_ -{- , U J . �r �A L1/ r.•�sl ORB 1, r -- Me i •`: K -- . 1 , I 3 3E 3c 38 68 • __ __— G �� ti is k rj0 : 2E 59 2ASA '1..:t r sq, 1 iJr 7 I r i r J 9 181 2 to 2 B i 6A1A. 1 Y Z „-_. x 2 2A1A 831 2A18 b J81 _� PI ANASE - -- 3 klittiop 7 `--- -.-, ,- CDIC 243A 2A1 2 3A ' © ---' 12.09k � p 11,. 11A 118 1108•.).,'' ...... . s . ir r.5010 C i• - -- - --- I C{ pov1 �a®MAC r T B '' p� rA d� 3A IA - y --, SUP1f' A-474 1 1 JO N A. FILE nnAN;',' -._.------ . 116k S-- 5 -_ I 1 - .--• oA -- --L r, t. __ .�- 1 -- 3 3e --- --{�-- Q _.G. �jgK- ..__. • —a— - - PAR 1 • 1 ` ' - __ I 6" 4A4 ; gyp''.._ um - i CIS I ia � 6K1 oY �y 2x�..AW elw --• 1 ..Z. r 1 r, 1104 I • • I 20 k 1105AI _ _ J. HALM a 3g _ 3 3 - 1 GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT SU71£` A-003 1 6A1 l 0 6 ,. 3 Ac 6.15 Ac RANSON ST. 1 • t r NQyS1Poµ BLw Alt 21 za 2a E , . I , i 6 k 'Cl 1 IA2 683 6B 681 '. • J G IA 2C 1t.� ' J1 - -- lift ,. E .- pk 'I 0 B , ` ,Cy[C�p°y' U51R� .6r IA;18, ;1` 7 1 4A • • 2A —.-- TRACT MAP ER�AG� \s 1A '2q a Y 2KI; IA 191 1B!+—,B,q I 4.3 k ttnd 8B-2 IOW 19. ISICC ISM -iB6C2 15.6 k .. 47' RHO ,�62 ,:,: �5 _Ie6r 3B� 211 R ... _• ._ _ _ t. _ ._ _ -._. .__�_ _ _ _ _. _ - ___. ___ _ in V) I R I 235 Pi _��0\ 7 1.33A E-. �` .L t / .{7 AC A w )4 L 0 Ill 21 �` �' ' Lam"c-3" ------- -- - z_. . -____ _ State of Texas III Bluebonnet Rd. Partners m 11'Al I ; i 1R ettl 1P 11 .. A IJ o'er._._ State of Texas it' L, ' Q1 g Tarrant (y ♦F c(�'---� rA ` IR 6 �_----Z-- --Zri .4' 1% 4.1 I Mc...7. . - t I t Church of Christ "C-3" , A Our King 1 1 Soutlake Kimball Venture l i � 1 ) l "CS" O _ TR 26 n ]�1= .74179 AC I (-11\ 1�,1-, �' t� I- I A Z - J n j ��,( / �_- .; LiIR -,E 1 r `i 1F _. I / �, �.- - ... _ I � � , I LE . 1 684 AC II • „ I 11? 1fI 1R 2 h 1 `19 AC. Spin #7 Representative Peter Sporrer I IF :, • C 7t • I TP ,A OACADJACE2aOWNERS AND ZONING - p I 8B-3 -- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-186 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 07 C-�d 6 ���& s d 72,7 I; i; ;i Y r):' `` q¢'St '• / ' u ' r AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" " " .' 'ikik, :' , SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG' d Districtunder the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by G:\ORD\CASES\480-186.1 RD Page 1 8B-4 the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their - original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, G:\ORD\CASES\480-186.I RD Page 2 8B-5 is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a acre tract of land situated in the ' „ and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to Llessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists.the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a Lviolation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:\ORD\CASES\480-186.1 RD Page 3 8B-6 Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law,and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. L MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:\ORD\CASES\480-186.1 RD Page 4 8B-7 • - PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G:\ORD\CASES\480-186.1 RD Page 5 8B-8 EXHIBIT "A" • KIMBALL AV�'NUE RIGHT-OF-WAY Field Notes • Being a 0.112-acre tract of land situated in Tarrant County. Texas and bein 'a part oil the S. Freeman Survey. Abstract No. 525 and the G.W. Main Survey. Abstract Not 1098 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the southerly right-of-way of Southlake BoulevardK(F.M. Highway No. 1709)and the easterly line of a tract of land conveyed by W.R. NAit to Marvin G. Darby and wife, Mary Darby by deed dated May 16, 1963 and recorded in Voltime 3806E Page 65 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas(DRTC1),said point being 65.40 feet southerly and radial to centerline survey station 430+79.21 and being North 54° 14'37' East a distance of 155.11 feet from the Southeast corner of said Darby tract and also being iht beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 1844.86 feet, a chord bearing of South 71'06'35" Ea¢t and a chord length of 43.88 feet: THENCE along the southerly right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard and 41ong said curve to the right through a central angle of 01'21'46"and an arc length of 43.8$ feet to a point in the westerly line of a tract of land as described in a deed to Gfrover G. Fickes crux recorded in Volume 8309, Page 1579(DRTCT); THENCE along the westerly line of said Fickes tract. South S3.59'29" Weft a distat.e of 162.19 feet to a point for corner; THENCE departing the westerly line of said Fickes tract. NORTH a distzn4 of 44.61 feet to a point for corner in the easterly tine of said Darby tract: THENCE along the easterly line of said Darby tract. North 54'14'37" East a distarde of 110.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;containing within these metes,and bounds 0.112 acres or 4,888 square feet of land, more or less. L G:\ORD\CASES\480-1 1.1 RD Page 6 8 B_9 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-104, Site Plan/The Southlake Center at Kimball REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for The Southlake Center at Kimball, being 1.9801 acres of land situated in the S. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 525, Tracts 6, 6B, and 6C; and the G.W. Main Survey No. 1098, Tracts 2B, 2C, and 2C1 LOCATION: Southeast corner of South Kimball Ave. and East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) OWNER: Royal Properties APPLICANT: Hodges &Associates CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District and "AG" Agricultural District ("C-3" request pending on the "AG" portion) LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/75 Ldn Contour NO. NOTICES SENT: Nine (9) RESPONSES: One (1) written response received within the 200' notification area: • Randy Perry(Southlake Kimball Venture Ltd), 11300 N. Central Expwy:, Suite 407, Dallas, Texas 75243-6712; in favor, "It represent acceptable Land Use under current zoning and current guidelines of City of Southlake." P & Z ACTION: October 19, 1995; Approved (7-0), ZA95-104, Site Plan for The Southlake Center at Kimball,subject to Site Plan Review Summary Revised No. 1 dated October 17, 1995, specifying the driveway entrance to be designated as "right/in" and"right/out" in item#14c and delete the articulation requirement on the east side of the restaurant in item#15. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Site Plat Review Summary Revised No. 1 dated October 17, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plat Review Summary No.2 dated November 3, 1995. KPG/ls G:\W PF\MEMO\CAS ES95\95-104S P.1 CC 8C-1 \�� �l 2J I CAI �� ��5 , sct /� On,.i5g3 " �_ T 1C jfyA� &25 Ac K SS- t' 2A\ Glp �#,N�" I 502A ., 5C1G 5C1H ,118. 8D!K �. f I ✓'—��Y- son 5028 ' Y �`" ` Opt _.``. `ice y ,�I 2A4 -- -0>,1 Q75 Act 5D3 r. - j /....1J SCIG2`sT 11H 8P r -- Ys~' 80.1 At JNI !'�4 504x - ` / :�n 1. O '•�� .�C'1' �.: / 8R, eB p 1 2 t���; 5D1A �� 1 its 85 BOA _ .tia //�� 3A N SC18 SCIA C �...,... .J LS LLL���JJJ �� / 552BT ` 1.. `1,..A-s6t ? � SA3A1 / 5I1I�i�(, G� "..•�' SA3 5C181 N5 J l� 3B` 3� :n�aa..,1, ! _ 7 © 9�MM ppN -r 11D ©© r, j 50, 1 NI 1,F i3FTnn Q11� A c z: ,• 57 R,It (��/� (��7I p D.Jt/�(�� x• SA4 " l U B'YOIIVIIl�I --C1AI W IfE W UV (1 ��1 1Er 287 2 7B4A BCt ,'.' 'i-- ,' � 0 4 28,• 288 A-5 2B12,:t2A 206 1- $. -L/, SURVEY A-IW9 �{ - rr a i L i - 262 28 ME 2135 2810 a �.• �6- F Fo 11 - 4,, 2"\ _\ _� , .,.� - •sA4�QOR5 se/c 20 2G x 2L 2H 2F 2J a i {� 281AA x\1 5 5C1 �N1--581--_--- + ``� 3A2 3A1 is E / r _.J c aG y1 ' �, t � .,/1 _ ;CJ f Opp 1 21C © © 2E 2G 2H 2Y imam Y' • C� S G m6 2A - �le, __ . 5S11A --- e+E �,,�_Q 2A, - • ' see - rtNt1'Y pIN� 2AtA(�J _ NPI 6REW`f : i- --- sax GQ-- - OPP i/ \1 2A I 5828 582A 14 146.. TIr''V M Qa Ei f-----^ 581 183 ,B 182 , �, swrtIr A-41 Ih 5A A c 3C xi B taiki‘ ,A 2A- ' NORTHWEST PKWY EAST 1 2E3 2E14 2E13 r' 6 zE 4Es 2AI / 2E12 2E7 Q R -; 1 A,Is18.PLACE 11 F4�p 4 . - 363 e-_ I •C 1"' �C�_ 1E.000 LANE 2E5 .2 �''� m fi y� �} i 2A2, 6�EAST SOUMAKE tllvD. -`f 2 -- I I .}J�'�1' y�L� -•� 1 , I , 1 e C, L ( r. / 2C 2 182A 182 18 , , 1♦1 i r---+ i IIi1114L. r- 1I 11 1 111 IRB 182e • 1 �P+ F( �� G� ti -- u A< g0 c,, ;; RRtt1 «'` .=A E' ) 3 3E o ,`• 3e Bs IRO' --- B 1B,`. .pRy 2A3A I' a�i.'J ��,ii6A1 A� I 1' VA p ___ 2A3 2A2A ("'� 2 I- 2 2A1A 2A18 b 381 _ _2� rio -- -- 3» 2A1C 2A• - _ -_' (� , 1C 12A3A /2A1 zc 2 3„ — -- , r 1209 k - O il. 11A 116 1. - I"--i _ 10 • IIE N �'�'-- ----i 1 �v r-\ 40 C E -,- - - = Ow 46�00 U�,t A STER _ • -�--- µ ' 3A 1A - SERVE'' A-474 1 I JOObN A. FREEullm ---- --- I3.6 - -[ . PARS-- 5 S" - k SUPYEY A- - '� ._-1_- Q[,�_k_ ' i 1 rt . _ PARK I 2 I I 614 !A/ I i ``off•�. 1101 I I _ i 6 � 6z1 i L ; I < ` FI S"A ` w ---- i ul 20 Ac 1105A1 I104 II , I r, J. ct+ n Ifil• L;��n G U 383 3 - 1 GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT rF'�, SUAVE' A-003 1 6A1 0 6 I•', 3 Ac 6.15 Ac RAMBOR ST.AM2A 28 2C1 ,lk e I! II,EE IA2C6..cAc 1 1A2 683 6e 681 . IA 2C NEg�14 ', , EN W 0 1 , PRE sc 6D 6E BJ� N %t --p�yJ 61 Ac 9�R�L 13 4 6* ` V J sA t.RiIi 6!1. 'CO\ r r , • TRACT MAP 4A CI 2A2 I (j� I. Ir ERA ti 1A 2A 2F RpY 2TI i IA ,� 1i84it 8410 Imo __. ... 2AI 1 MOE 184E 1BKI 8 C_2 � 6.3 Ac I:: 18KIA -186CI • 8ify� taw BMQA 'ram 18 a 1B6C7 15.6 Ac r '6NJ `•� A R t� •�,T 1Is •106F )II I I 782 • 2B . .E t� a 1 D.,.r,. 184 184G�,Z 1814 -1� `. . _ I —Lys_ L v v i g_ J I L 384 33 , ci—s) 1\ A 0 . i x 11 fric ADJACENT OWNERS . : : - — - — AND ZONING \7I / /4/ ,33 Lil O'C'' m 333A Spin #7 Representative �!�% 332 „C_3.. Peter Sporrer —3�� m C. Lam Bluebonnet Road J. Parker Partners 13 Tarrant Co. 1 E 2 t---) 'CC\ r- - _ N 's mklikV _ ---j1 � � Church of Christ I Our King ) I q !\ D p.. J v ic > _. , ..& ' " c- ‹ (--_-, j Southlake Kimball Ventur "C_3" / /� 131 m "C-2" 2A 2A3 J. Ezell 2 H. Carr ' L 3 Ac "AG" u-i "AG" 2A I 8C-3 • fi City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No.: ZA 95-104 Review No: Two Date of Review: 11/03/95 Project Name: Site Plan -Southlake Center at Kimball, 1.918 Acres.Thomas East Survey Abst.#474 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Royal Properties Bodges &Associates. Architects and Planners 11300 N. Central Expwy.. Suite 407 13642 Omega Dallas.Texas 75243 Dallas. Texas 75244-4514 Phone: Phone: (214) 387-1000 Fax : Fax : (214) 960-1129 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/23/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787.CITY 1. Staff recommends that the applicant change the name of the project site. Similar retail site names already exist. 2. Show the tract lines of the properties located along the north side of East Southlake Boulevard. Show the location of any existing and proposed utilities,including connections to water, sewer and gas. 4. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards: A. Correct the type of bufferyard shown on the graphic along East Southlake Boulevard to reflect 20' Type 0 bufferyard. B. Correct the type of bufferyard shown along the east line of South Kimball Avenue, including the corner clip, on the graphic and calculation chart to reflect the required 10' Type B bufferyard and correct the planting calculations. 5. The following changes are needed with regard to driveway entrances: A. Provide the distance to the nearest driveway entrance centerline, south along Kimball and east along Southlake Boulevard,from the proposed driveway entrance centerline if less than 500'. B. Label the depth of the proposed driveway throats. C. The driveway entrance on Southlake Boulevard does not meet the Driveway Ordinance requirement of 500'minimum distance from the east line of Kimball Avenue . D. Confer with the TxDOT on the location of driveway curb return in relation to the storm drain inlet on F.M. 1709 8C-4 City of Southiake,Texas E. The minimum width required for common access easements is 26'. F. Staff recommends that a common access easement be provided from the driveway entrance on the west line of the restaurant site to the west line of the retail site. 6. Compliance with the articulation requirements of Ordinance No. 480-S is listed in the chart below. Please provide architectural rendering depicting the north,east,and west elevations of each building. Retail Site Horizontal Vertical Facade Articulation Articulation Front (north facing 1709) required yes yes provided clarify3 no4 Side (east) required yes yes provided clarify3 no4 Side (west) required yes yes provided clarify3 no4 Rear (south) required no' no' provided no no Wall is not visible from F.M.1709 3 Building elevation and plan view do not reflect the dimensions of the horizontal articulation. • 4 Does not appear to vertically articulate 15%of the wall height of 21'-6". Restaurant Site Horizontal Vertical Facade Articulation Articulation Front (north facing 1709) required no2 no2 provided no no Side (east) required yes yes provided no no Side (west) required yes yes provided yes yes Rear (south) required no' no' provided no no Wall is not visible from F.M.1709 2 Wall length does not extend 3 times the wall height 8C-5 • City of South lake,Texas * No review of the landscaping is intended with this concept Plan. Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Ord. 544 will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit,a site plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan along with the building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Royal Properties Hodges&Associates, Architects and Planners G:\WPF\REV\95\95-104SP.WPD 8C-6 CI kik Ia; i t##(( 3 �� b Q / ofa '( KIMBALL ROAD S L. 1 lir / r -- 7 I, rii r.:1:121:1 IC.:12 C.2 021:1„•,.: ........?:....%. I 1 / /Pi g 141, 144. , iiii, gri 4.____. • Ii[ .m ura,,:,.." - 1 / ,,, = it ill q / ,. v _! 1 : .W !"; i ' iiiiii hili— LE21119 I i ,�-.�m4S� .i • E�low_ WE :. II - 1-11f1. : ila r___,•I/ _ _ : 111 aft!' 0 I:• IQ t i'-'• 1►�\ ter►�_ --�_y-_(-_ ./..::.: i• .� �� g / —.< R .. t :•: f it $Li l — i IP � �1f q *um 1 iR'_ /! _il i it ' p n ' 'i�0`.+ t / / NM is 11 -: li pip: . f OPAPPM - F 3 ; Ramo rme.ir.um 1-• / 4 , 4 11 lit ', �I / - � r i p Ta( OilsII hive, , i - ' _1I,!,41 i 14 1 ■ k_,- i i1 I if 1 li ill 11 ini Pr/ I WC iili i 11 19 IN illi ii pi !v LTT 711., 1 iiiPI I!!!! 1111!! 1111111 ... i ! P• 1— i Hq1 is i< T ' • s 1 l} f i • I, il it w> • ■ ��LpE R� h .1 Oil I 1 .,.. I Tr 'i I< Y� YYY e q9 _1 YYYY . , , 1 '; I 0 i... i. p a a , _i . , ,,, i 1 1 1 . 11 g . ., , I ,...1 dr d ; h ...,51 III 49- i = _ I . 1 . i 1 Wit r W 1 il i 1 rit I ki A 1 r A 1 — Kirewu. L , 11 OI1 AA ` _: r g i g a 3 • e. ;2 f i i 1 P , , _ to 8C-7 J iii City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-92,Development Plan/Solana,Phase I REQUESTED ACTION: Development Plan for Solana,Phase I,being 54.99 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 3A2, 3A3A, 3C, and portions of Tracts 3A3, 3A3A1, 3A4A, and 3A4B and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1 This plan proposes 70 residential lots. LOCATION: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. No. 114), East of East T.W. King Road,North of West Dove St., and West of North White Chapel Blvd. ')WNER: MTP-IBM Phase II &III Joint Venture APPLICANT: Maguire Thomas Partners CURRENT ZONING: "C-3, CS, and P.U.D" District REQUESTED ZONING: "R-P.U.D."Residential Planned Unit Development(2nd Reading of rezoning pending at City Council on October 17, 1995.) LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/100 Year Flood Plain NO.NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: Two (2) responses received within the 200 feet notification area: • Barbara Harris, 824 S. Perkins Street, Southlake, Texas 76092,in favor. • I W. Riemenschneider, P.O. Box 254, China Spring, Texas 76633-0254, in favor. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995;Approved to Table(7-0), ZA95-92, Development Plan for Solana, Phase I,until the October 19, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the Applicant's request. October 19, 1995; Approved (5-1-1), ZA95-92, Development Plan for Solana, Phase I, subject to Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 8D-1 MEMORANDUM eURTIS E. HAWK A95-92, DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 3, 1995 PAGE 2 1995,deleting item#4 (pedestrian access easement for the trail along North White Chapel Boulevard). STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated November 3, 1995. KPG/ls G:\W PF\MEMO\CASES95\95-92DP.1 CC C C 8D-2 O. Ulls tlU. 77l I n SUAWY 10 9 e 7 78 6A 5 1 3 I--il we JOKES ROAD .--\1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I 16 y 1v^J 7A 6 A. HANAFFEV J 17 t 1 SURWTr A-916 . 1 ` 16 \ 19 I1l111 11111'111111111rrn11,1111' 11111'1111t I \ fl __ _- Ili11u1� T_ _- —I--- . `• C <.. _ SU it A_1003' -1-' _F- �-- ---1 ,I -1 ' _I_:7" \ W. 1 1_.' 11 _I - T �iI W. r W. MILLS -,+t+i-tii h`Fr,;;;;;;;,' 1— - I D A-13ee0 3tAae'r A-e779 -1.I ... ... L 1 1111111111111t111111 IIIIII III or:J IiI111 1111111111TIT I 11 it 11111 1 T W� m ..• 1.. ill I n I I I 1 ' I 0 Iill 11 II I1J IL u ILLLLULL1111J USA i e DAVID DOMTHIIT LY A4(i: 2 , ! 11111111� SUQM'r A-16070 II111111 7 • t -' >— l_ ;.1.1.4.11,14;,;hi,j;;4, DENTON • HENRY 1 IA /W. blILL 1 1B IIItI11111111�� TARRANT /- scc iRKr A-PO St/l7t{r A-1096 1 I ]w�tlR yr�`�` �' � I T / BEN _{ y /'Sa� sa,1.A1a - \ seater 3t 3 ` E 2 / �,� '2A / t E art.a FIR a c 77 / f L Dl�lfn�_ _ DAVI •O> oy6_ �+ 7-- •. 1'jim Er A-19Sd `yam ,A11jIQ 2A7 2IL51 �`.1 l�--"-.% ,.�^ Kr A-440 i ., �9 soveccAl IBM -- 1 _ - 1-- :• + 1p/� / NI- p• 14I0 7..5.1-Alj .... , 1 's MARTIN :... 2A5 x, x lo- ... tA.t. . 1015 wOLL ,POQ � J i_J 2R 1 t' x6 2 IR .t �LSIi� D. {i3F C F 21.6 Sc • w •1A1 I y • - r A-1207 ,'f G' LYpp .� 19nk 1 MA R 1 ---- _1 ... , 'jI. Al_ ,� 01"�A�E 1 ._ ... (1u. ` E /,,, q --• 6.95 Ac �lIC L__... y. — Ic :,..1C1G 'C ;..aa ;.>twi tK ' II\ I ,.., mi pa \ :. 78 i 1CI 2813 At U 1C1EIA1 I 7AIA1 7A1A 7A 7A2 IAl ���� ,7-, 10E1 • 1E2 IGS t molig o, .,' .�..1.�.. p la ,„� I IO Ac v�Y�'1. (ail NH ��J'e A,C s o. G�lta ,- pNFOR ►' W �J�yµ-���y���� ,eIC 5TAt 1{Y A-1/3. f 0LAU`— ® °v Cn�e t/L�aYV�/ v 182 SUt18r A-1107 ) �p rr A-,J30 1C�p� 48 M 4 Ac (1i / -T�f_ � IC1 IC .( TE V j MI 182( 181 ,„ BtU u.n Ac 2 Ac 3.79 Ac • .-:0 I•1 114 1. TE5 A 6,AJ�• .Tpie Ry. •13.77 At 9.� W 4.3 Ac'el 316 Ac , . 7. 6 -a - 01dN 18 IE ID I 1 _p1)9 4 F� 1 ;"$7. �`e Y" 1 3.85 Al WI 10r1�r,71 D • ,-7- ^/ • . 0 I At - 182 1 I _..I"tid-.' I 'I 1J EAST O0 ST. I I 1 HEST eCK ,S1tCEt 'i 1 •1 tR al`ier,k TRACT Yd ' �o '"'� 6 ��• .. _ IA , , - MAP Al m IA Q dRv1` YE5 8D-3 DL cd NA ' 1I! \ \\ III - . ..di —rQr \\ --_1 5 • y, ADJACENT OWNERS - .p ol. AND ZONING - - ; - - - - - _ ti 2 4©1 '4A1 ; - - _BRIAR__L7T - - i _ r. _� 4A 2A1 i .• � 2A5 3A1 ,, 3A 31 IL AP", r _ ; "Sp-2" K1D A _ J 2R y3A1� -- — 3A4 1R 1 __ ( COS Del p iatc E — V 3A48 SURVEY A- ® 207 -� GA 131,1).._ 3A ' AcI 15 oNNo — . - N�` Al . G ---- \.i 1 , ; ; 1G i gl 8: 5W' �� ; i 11411111h9 Ac :: AGLi3 Ac76Acl 5.1 1G3 ilE D a [AINTI1 i roRD ' �Pr • 1c2 - - •VEY A-1134 51Pi & G pp P��'SF-1 q" 1E - e .* W . C H P i- ..! 4IR,EY A- `- A-30 ii 1C,1 1C A�L N 84.22 Ac 2Ac 3.79Ac � 1 ( D Oa 1 < rY • 9.03Ac " 4.3Ac181 32.8Ac _ 18 1E 1D = 1 3.85 Ac 1E1`IDI o F Z 1 1 1 ADJACENT 1H 18 11J1 1J G EAST DOVE ST. - OWNERS 2.15 1.87 2 Ac — __ — F1 i2R1R2; , ;4R1i4R 1A3 m 163C J, - _ kAl1YA' r�n� -- 6.2 Ac - 1. Sparks, P. �j 2. Schelling, M. Spin #2 Representative 18388 3. Ferguson, S. Martin Schelling ` �:a 511 - - 4. Calli, M. , 5. Riemenschneider, J. Li ` • - 6. Thacker, K. 1 1A2 11.33 Ac Sorg, K. F �' Stanford, M. t8; - 9. Harris, B. 8.645 Ac 5.9 Ac Q 10. Hays, B. ���� 1c - 1 � Y A-162G """ 8D-4 � 51 lAl \ S 1i N�R L.. DESIGN STANDARDS for A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (As approved on 10/17/95 at the second reading by the Southlake City Council) Southlake, Texas October 31, 1995 • SOLANA By: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture Nine Village Circle, Suite 500 Westlake,Texas 76262 Prepared By: Maguire Thomas Partners Nine Village Circle, Suite 500 Westlake,Texas 76262 L 8D-5 VIII. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following Development Standards for the Residential P.U.D. are separated into two"Product Types" listed as follows: • Product Type "A" -- Single Family Detached (15,000 s.f. minimum lot size) • Product Type "B" -- Single Family(6,000 sf min. lot size) The product types and development standards are further described as follows: Product Type "A" Single Family Detached (15,000 s.f. minimum lot size) 1. Permitted Uses • The detached single family residential portion of the Residential Planned Unit Development ("R-P.U.D.") shall permit those uses as set forth in Section 14, "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. The following uses shall be specifically included: • "Permitted Uses," Section 14.2 • "Accessory Uses," Section 14.3 • "Specific Use Permits," Section 14.4 • "Special Exception Uses," Section 14.7 2. Development Regulations The development regulations set forth in Section 14.5 (Ordinance No. 480, as amended) shall be applicable when developing within the detached single family residential portion of the "R-P.U.D."with the following exceptions: • Lot Area -- the minimum area of a lot shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. • Lot Dimensions -- each lot shall have a minimum width of one hundred (100) feet, except cul-de-sac lots shall have a minimum width of sixty -five (65) feet at the front building setback line. Each lot shall have a minimum lot depth of one hundred (100)feet. • Floor Area-- the main residence shall contain a minimum of two thousand (2,000) square feet of floor area. • Rear Yard -- there shall be a rear yard of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. L 8D-6 Product Type "B" Single Family Detached 1. Permitted Uses The detached single family residential portion of the Residential Planned Unit Development ("R-P.U.D.") shall permit those uses as set forth in Section 14, "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. The following uses shall be specifically included: • "Permitted Uses," Section 14.2 • "Accessory Uses," Section 14.3 • "Specific Use Permits," Section 14.4 • "Special Exception Uses," Section 14.7 • Limited to 70 lot max. in northern section 2. Development Regulations The development regulations set forth in Section 14.5 (Ordinance No. 480, as amended) shall be applicable when developing within the detached single family residential portion of the"R.-P.U.D."with the following exceptions: • Height -- no building or structure shall exceed two and one- L. half(2-1/2)stories, nor shall it exceed forty(40) feet. • Front Yard -- there shall be a front yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet. • Side Yard -- there shall be a side yard of not less than five (5) feet. • Side Yard Adjacent to a Street — there shall be a side yard adjacent to a street of not less than ten (10) feet. • Rear Yard — there shall be a rear yard of not less than twenty (20) feet. • Maximum Lot Coverage -- on not more than twenty-five (25%) of the lots, all buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding fifty percent (50%) of the lot area. On seventy-five (75%) or more of the lots, all buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding forty percent(40%) of the lot area. • Lot Area --the minimum area of a lot shall be six thousand (6,000) square feet. • Lot Dimensions — each lot shall have a minimum width of fifty (50) feet and a minimum depth of one hundred (100) feet. lip r, - , -�,_-� •• Floor Area--the main residence shall contain a minimum of iril, j �``= .._._: :-',-; ,,, k two thousand (2,000) square feet of floor area. ` 1 Maximum Number of Lots -- no more than seventy (70) __ `j `" "` ! ; Product Type "B" lots shall be permitted within the Planned L_ __,:-LT"- +'�` ; I ; _ ; Unit Development. 8D-7 . . - . • .. , • CONCEPT PLAN • . . SOLANA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AUGUST, 1995 . - .0.'1:Tr..... • APPROXIMATE COUNTY LINE — - .4 ''"". - . ••.•• - ...•VE" PROPOSED SOLANA RENDO4TIAL rue. / z - . I( 4:,...--• II .0,0 ..:0.•`. .., .0,00, \• - 4/... ••••••.• '•,4114D..d.!,..,..„, •11•51,1 am ••••nr• em.ar .........tet 4/ I I 1 I RESIDENTK WA . 1.0.0 0C. [PAC.OPEN SPOCE OM) - 21.1 K. SLOTOIrl NET AREA . 111.2 IC. -...1,-,........;(:;:::::,1;;;;,,:s:,•:::,:'..::::::-,..:-:;,:.:,:,:;:7,:,:;:i.,,.....-Vni::-:::,.:sr. .., :::intS,SETi I I ---IT:•:,,. .. I i 11.0A.TO K KOCAISO . MO AC. 1-... ......N. ..... • • iffrt,,4Wriii f .:!••.IMPliiiin,1 TOTAL VOSS MEA . 19112/C.ISI ''''..1.P'Ks '• - '' 1., • • I I *".dit, . 1C1'"r•F- ...:7(-OW • •••••••••-.•••••T••••••• .....................• , 0,,„) „of •••••••••••••imam••••• .i!::::::::::: • : 4, (ALL MKS MTE APPKoNATE) I I i I 0" COMPUTATION OF PROPOSED MAGER •••."1•61' C•Ii4:710" • .• ••......... .::::::::::1 • • ,:••::::::x I ! th.."' OF DWELLNG LINTS .4-1-rftrigo; • • * ,,a, ....-. ... .... •• 4:04,,,,,,. •••••••New.re a-••••• ,..„...mOST .... •%:: . I e T .GROSS MEN . 1,12 AC. '-•..443'4P11111111: ....,•• 40 •NOPOSE0 COGITT .2.115 OAL/K. \ ...). ita,(0/4 ._,, .. ....._ •• • . • PNOPOSE0 NO.Of MUMS. .13.1 • 1—mar. ,.-- --- _..,t0 ' !• •7•—•• - ••• ''` "to -? . il:•i. ,..v-- = ..,.----- •r• • ... `.,. \.....,--•tirro_. ...,,. L,I.1 . - ° . . . •- .•— •• ••• ' ...••••••••41•••• 0.... ''' =.V.. Oa: ' .• .".if.;;t44t.4_.i:t t' rt _.- , _.,. .. .., !i ... • "D'r• . \ -1o, .." .,t I PT'••NJ '1 ••••••••••••. ee -*:•,,',":-•',':*:::-. \ 11.;. .? \ \K,...... :,....„tl :": ..... .. . . • 4:17. .. . e • • e i -1111.06,:;:i*i*:.!,,,. '• ..e•:•.•,..:•:•:•:,...,.. \ RESEW/01AL rm.-wmto6t wre• WO ..L.'"W:11:.' '.'tr:•-•11/1..‘ .. • . TA. 4fr . . _.,..11, ti,„;+;,+;;:4 .. i 6 r' ..., •-•:••::. \ .,Iii:!_•. fitip g'‘v,.',-2C..,.„ : 44 ,\ \ 4:64.411.q.c44,7trypw , •1115 • .14*. \ \ ,l'+'1414-FOrl'i., 1 kV. , `..• --,,.- i - g ,• ar,1,- 3,- , ' • f'• ...Si • '. 0, • .d. — *6;14 ..§0 1 • 4 \ .\ --:Let44tf41 " • g----1/ \•..\ to ., .• A sr \ ,, LTTTTTI r-\ %ell" e \ .. vtizt4ar. i . , `.. ...,.„gat- . ,----,,0( loll e (.N-;;„ ,''.7‘ .4..."711•171+-1"...*. \ ,n,ir . , • e , ..4 s.-6,\ - ream= REsceinm_,.)00q:-.. . _ '-- ,'• ' 11 . . . j"- \-, .-----.1 e • • 1•\(...„ , 3 'SOLANA {!,_/1 1 4IP PROPOSED SOLANA NICN-PCSINENTIAL '. , w- • '•-.Ili •; SI° • 4ao• t - .€\.‘`. P.U.D. \ • 11111IIN ';',."`" .‘^-6.--- 6 .,1..6. •.,\•saMT 3=743= er COSTNG mod F..“.,m. \ . \„. J., \ \ nr • :Jr.= .* * -- ,ect,... , cant4G LUE1 w .7 CONKIN OFETI SPACE ' - US AC. 11.0••10 OE OTOCATED • St PC. •••• \,...its.=••"1:=== 8/'‘.. '•. • , PROPOSED LOD..MirED% - 127.1.c. # - c—':— • • Joe % TOTAL CROSS AREA 9° /s)1 .. . ./..:.!ar'..- .%iJ (ALL WAS WIC PPOROSOLIAlt) I .o. 4. \ \ . A. 1 - •,.,./ .. ..,- . ...:-.„..-r., \ \ %ay .... \ \ :.l.Z.1 • lit. i e . \ \ .2, •8•i-,--.J'—i— • ..,0 • _\_19 • •••\ .-.. ... \\ \ ,. ...410,.. 2:..... , ' ),... . . ..... •s1- es:e. Il*, • 1 I I 1/4. 1.04tir' "1 ....L. : 40,...., • I., . $ „,t_27_. 1404:• \ VelifiV'serir" sq. \. 4114 ..V i LEGEND \ ... p4vii-i.. •-\ I. ••••;:!•-`. Ny \ \ •_•-• g!...? M cOMMON OPEN SPACE TO OE DEDICATED 41\ .` P-• ••,• NON- • 04,,,NIP TO IRE CRY OF SOUTNLAXE l'\ \ .'.0 NO.— .; 1...., r.::1 COMMON OPEN SPACE TO BE UNWEANED .• \. s• ••• • 0 / '''• LOT 1 BY BOA.OR PAI A .'' — 'i ••••'.• •=1•Trt vA FLOOD PLAN gE".\ \ \ •''-.9„ - -1; vr...-- •:.:i ...• • ,., \ --1., ....c--, ,, oe _la '•' ... L.U.D. LAND USE DESIGNATION le; ' •••.%.••MOB, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIOENTML ) re \ ., . e Is-4.'a L.D.R. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL <5'4,, -. • • .1 • C.0.E. CORPS OE ENGINEERS SNOT l -1t."-aL.if ... . Ara AG ZONING-AGRICULTURAL "%E.:" , "'•,*7.4'.. ' :4 ,,,..e.,...CS ZONING -COMMUNITY SERVICE , I AESJDEN11AL CS ZONING-GENERAL COMMERCIAL 1.. 2 , .— ._ P UD ZONING- PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT % 1, _.,..._/ 1 ,..',....st,s741••.•-PIM.MC• n 9 SF) ZONING- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL I e - Imo.0, ,,,,„...,,.., • POTENTIAL AREAS 0,PERMITTED ANCILLARY t N , ! 1-s ,..,.. .7"-......... . @ %... :. * NON-RESIDENTIAL USES C-3 A C-S NOT '6".' - ... TO EXCEED A TOTAL OF 19.9 ACRES N TIE 'it\ ... F • , Nerauxr..... ••••... 1%.• • -., 0,,,,,,, t - .-••r..... •...- . - - ..---2--.." :".__ . .\. ENTIRE RESIDENT./P.U.D. 1 4*, , • • •‘, , . -::,7,- ez ,- ° 9 0* • -- ,17., . ,,A,• 4}-1..,..., -1*..._ / I:.e;,....."' * X.;;;;,••': 77.'-' -...• , .. ---. ''' ' ---'-- '-'. 11./ -.--...L. ' A!:n''''Mr'"•.:1•"...".".."="• ..". - . .....-c;EST - ---...... --.6-6;ii-\ .... 1` i ......¢..na.....i.a.1ms 14=4 6••*Os \ 'T I: 04 Teata M.o..O.114.41••••010 OLT•up ow• LT••••rs 00.0.0roteas ''' '' -'\ '' I IV;11=27 r\A74211—?;-1• •411,/0 nO.osa T RR 04 moron Tait MOT • ,ez I WIN IA re.04.I FIN Stimi•...frI,As. • •0•0.•0 nOo•C.0.10 To.wl T•O•COLD gnome:. :, LAMA CI it ,Loin..3<-3*so C-I T•OLL4P•olos•Mr*Wm••• 0,.04•rt O u•TOI To Sow=samt•••• OWNER: MTP-E114 PHASE I I•JONT VENTURE MUCA NNE VILLAGE 01/CLE MATE 500 WESTLAKE TEXAS 76262 1617/430-0 363 • •PNTs MAGUIRE INOMAS PARTNERS TOE YE/AGE CIRCLE SURE SOO WESTLAKE. TEXAS 76262 191714.30-0303 ENGNEEK BOURS&PITTMAN DF.W.,NC. $310 KA RVEST MU.DRIVE SUITE 100 DALLAS.TEXAS 75230 12141991-00R LAID PLANNER; THE SRA ROLM MI N. SUITE 400G•rvm:•L-nm••on FIGURE 7 DALLAS,TEXAS 75202 1214195,1-0016 can•••um-re 8D—8 City of Southiake,Texas DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ase No.: ZA 95-92 Review No: Two Date of Review: 11/03/95 Project Name:Development Plan-Solana Phase I,54.99 Acres out of the James B.Martin Abst.#1134, and the Reis D. Price Survey Abst.#1207 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER: IMP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture fury&Pittman D.F.W..Inc. Nine Village.Circle. Suite 500 5310 Harvest Hill Drive, Suite 100 Westlake.Texas 76262 Dallas.Texas 75230 Phone: (817) 430-0303 Phone: (214) 991-0011 Fax : (817) 430-8750 Fax : (214) 991-0278 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/24/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY.QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787.CITY 1. Show the location,type,and height of all walls,fences, and screening devices. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture Bury& Pittman D.F.W., Inc. G:\WPF\RE V\95\95-092DP.WPD ---- 8D-9 s di. . tf. ' :i'• .1.. • :-• • I, ;1 . ...::,..---•-,,,--7,;,11.,::-2..girli • • - . :_ . r..:. 14 3 : • ..,• -ill ) Ii 1 1 •::: a q .;:'. ... • - • ,.i.,. . • .. • . 1 1 i 1. .:• ic*.;:. • i 111 •—• i '. . 1 15.rixi- -11 el 1 :t. d ,lis 1 jill-';,....: ..11 , ,Igit.. A,%v.:7 i• , • - -"- k., •1 i r I 1 i - , I a IM 4,;•;,..•., . .1:••-• ...x' • - . . f . . . 4 " • .•...-. '--,..:- •• • • . if i 16 • i.,. ..v. . / . • Wili • .. ?..ti" . '•I .; I / I 401 I 1 f .. .3 I • '1- 1 ' ' 1 -: __ II? iq,*„ I l! i I i A xi li 2i,‘. I .*f. -•'; I ii •X'' 4,1 A"'"--- i le, .6 ..404PAr.' •'' -.. • 4 —.2e—,...2 i A. • h.• 6 doe.> "- ..j '42... 111 X . _ .. • VIZ.. /4 .41.‘ ' * .'—"N\- - i'.... ' -- .. '3,4, :1'., li 1 ''re> . 66 ' . ii& / 4.• f % •: i' ' %et*, I PO ." t I' 13 N '•e`1:44,41F. °- s'" '- . 1::', • - IC- I '42\ i I 1 A s ..... .% 'ede... ' :.. ., ;3--j ' C. ' I ad i, ht. . i I • " - 'g I--1 I 44-04,- ,, :_.. ...D. __ . __, iiti,, oil ..? :i 1.7 's, \ s.:: Alf .....:: I MIMI..... . IV I 11411 ,*•\ 'I ,.' I-1:--7 '--:' - -- .;••.—_--- ., ..m.. • 1,1 . are t • . 11)11 '.1. - 85 P: ;i' I I' , .1.\: . ....:! ''.s•'' ' „or \ / I 4 `74,74,,n.F.;;;...--, „:,:,-..: ',;....6-!....i:.,,lii w.te "141--`-'" '1, ' , -0, 0 \ IM 626 1 4 de • 1 At% I I A _ rrrrr ro4 pi i. _ le (c itii . -4 ..,...,. .--1 f a % '' 101111111111111.,',e."I • ,.7.11:1 3. I i •" ,, , I1 .... . a , II ..., , atil, .,1',,\ • i • . ....' .., ..* i .-- 1 • 111 .2. I la I 0 1 i mit lip* iii f, Mg 1 110 fl -1 il • /.41, p 'g !* 12221 .....: 1 1. 1,1 ,222s k,---14,f., •l• 9 I i 1; ' si 1 C g ii 14 iii,...-dr, I,4,..4 „. q .-ir.b.,..,.. 1 kyrilMult* i I ,-7 ill la lb hill scan; 1 ti.TiiM1 1 ii 1 iig iro ir...„,....„:„. 0,,;1 i 1.! z 1 1 E -g 61 i 1 g:'§ 0 Wi`lq -• 1 ' i=eat I II h a 1 liN:3 lent 1 ! 11 In i r 3 i li 1 1 2 : ill it i 1 - ,. - • . ..... .....• . . • 8D-10 I 1 (€ ) Z W O1 €I! Q N f 4 ..�,'tin a i If l f 11 1 1 .1. I I 1 , 1 1 W w 0 al I W 1 8 o Y r, Jt Y L R _1 l w a v < z — Z C 0 r z .y< a a /W k/' O 0 - ll o ta w ? — _-I• I 0 a a < 0 d F w 1 a � /�-� r F V � z Z w n. v . W o r� V' v L w �` t -j11 k. N / W W R F J J w a a a I a w L. J \ < N y U 0 x mliti Dili u / iN m w w 7 I re 1 ,\ N, W la. 0 0 0 0 F m li u I Z w Z 0 o 0 w F < I— U a W W W /\ e. N N gzZ o J Z; o o<gu a W i0 Q mfZ x 0. JU No < I< LIo W Cx LL XgFZW , I (lbaol <x< OFF ZFy� ZWW 3z W wNu a� 0 Z I ZKZ U 4U� ZN� UNw CO ID •., 0 = I 3 0 z - a a City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-93, Preliminary Plat/Solana, Phase I REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Solana, Phase I, being 54.99 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 3A2, 3A3A, 3C, and portions of Tracts 3A3, 3A3A1, 3A4A, and 3A4B and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1. This plat proposes 70 residential lots. LOCATION: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. No. 114), East of East T.W. King Road,North of West Dove St., and West of North White Chapel Blvd. OWNER: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture APPLICANT: Maguire Thomas Partners CURRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D.," Residential Planned Unit Development (2nd Reading of rezoning pending at City Council on October 17, 1995.) LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/100 Year Flood Plain NO. NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: Two (2)responses received within the 200 feet notification area: • Barbara Harris, 824 S. Perkins Street, Southlake, Texas 76092,in favor. • J.W. Riemenschneider, P.O. Box 254, China Spring, Texas 76633-0254, in favor. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 1995;Approved to Table(7-0),ZA95-93,Preliminary Plat for Solana,Phase I,until the October 19, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the Applicant's request. October 19, 1995;Approved(6-0-1), ZA95-93, Preliminary Plat for Solana, Phase I, subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 1995, deleting items#9 (streets' boundary lines) and#13 (pedestrian access to trail along North White Chapel Boulevard). 8E-1 • MEMORANDUM L CURTIS E. HAWK 'ZA95-93, PRELIMINARY PLAT NOVEMBER 3, 1995 PAGE 2 STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated October 13, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated November 3, 1995. KPG/ls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-93PP.1 CC (bre 8E-2 1 22 . uw_..1....._ ' ...,.� .♦ . •1 l I . a REIS D. PRICE C3 II 10 9 6 7 78 6A 5 I S I / "' SUrt£r -99. 48 v B0e A7RES ROAD `` ' \ 9 10 II 12 13 1/ 15 +6 • Iji 17 : 1 J. 11V AIL FFE 17 2 ' SUPKr A-916 I 21 19 16 II- J,,,,r „11, „1,( 1(n,lrllilnnl'I,Trrrrr- I \ -1 -� _l l =,_v�_ �_ S l l - rRi EIS PR 2 1 2 IA -�� -1 �- ��rvI�-� .../;:/.../ :, :., 'I//�\`\ gyp/ _1 _, I -1_ \ I J —1- 1"f.1 1 I EDLI 11llal 4 — I I 3lArtfr W. MILLS -r'f4iii rti l r• �a-1+,-r—... ... D . A-Iseeo a 1111111 ... 1- — SU Wr A-.77B Kq' _11111111111'll 1111l11111111.1114 3 3 Q .i.11l lil..11 IIl,lilrllillll lI l , I '' /� .111.111/11 _:1 1 its I L Ill LL I Li LL I LL11J 1 J USA II b 1,�1 1�i, DAVID DaOU1IIIT / ' '' 4 I k /1 r l 1 1 r 1 SURVEY A-r6070 1 2 "Tii ii i ii� 7 • I 1 - 1- L- ; ..14,;,;ill;..4 DENTON HENRY 1 1A W. HILLS 1 18 ,�,t J TARRANT „_ sTArKr A-7Iz / SUrKr A-1006 I I - /7 yr sarRaA E LSVE r r T pq/� M2 p nn CO" - { / 1 cm-w F- a. ,C 2 / 4V l 1 J DLSIUU 1 2A , E 1R ul - -- 2A7 \' DAVIDA0WrgiYT _ el." 2-- 4.- 2 ��, ����r tEr A-s.e •,\T r./.. ior DN. �-- J- 1 I l _ it*/ -�- ,rw 1'wn �� 1 ; 1 Erg- KI J _r--y, 1 : 1 r- ' / RAn(. . WTI 7A5 +- 3A W� p O ' ' 7 `-• IIIIIIIIIIII * iRw_J 29 1 ---- J .1 „ 3A. GEC IS D.. 10 R ►C F 21.6 A< • �. y v i 3 - , r A-1207 1 L 'IPA. l_ 19.n At ST0NN R 1 ---- `u. " E51A? \v a1 A 645 Ae 1 11(...i_r !g1 IC I 1 ai► I 7� \ .,t- . . xi A. L. // 161 26.13 At C) 1CIElA1 1C1ElA tl tf1C .76 Ac�` r ' IC1E1 lik .',11 Calengainillik ` 1E2 1W e RI .6 ,. .,.:a..u�. 2 r�/�\gyp e W. (�SCC1(;__..{1^'(MIIA 1101 -1% !Vl L6S o. klitA .( N0ORp 06''. ��7/ /eat �/(��L--le ".k.. Y VU. PA•N M �e 161A um SUPKr A-I/S. 1�1A`G.�-�� q l .0 /1...L 171/- lbll('8g1(0 V' WIC U P , I82 s1Ar1f1 A-1107 �A1 Nv 69 fr A-JJO>� In AO .A f At ., '✓✓ 9 VA 3I U1 1 481� II •� �.`trio M.n Ac 2 Ac`I 171 At ICE �p 1-• 11' • VA2 1 159 . It ; Ate- a (r��, E5 11n k 181 f �,C� ftp' • t. u At ue A< N r Itr2A �10" 16 IE ID T. 1 / < p 1 3.65 1E1 101 7_S 1 i q1 I • » AlI 1 �, 82A1 ( •1 _-_IHp I 181 I 1J j EAST 00tc St. .iiii STRUT TRACT MAP �Mp;Yd ' N '"'� c ■�• I x , ,A Rp ES P.V. . Me r 3sAc +k ORS—}.{A , y,.f '( ..—, IA Q AO glir - + OL r OU� Y --- If \ \ \ 8E-3 I ' III - . r -.id i -I Q r I 5 ' i, - - 1 ADJACENT OWNERS i-- _ at -.-' AND ZONING - - 1 - r - 481 ; • - LW ; - 4A ( i2A2• 1A1 _ ,)461.1 ?AS 3A1 ; — 3A — — 31 OLL A ppt1IO - i/ "SP-2" IR' ID_ J 2R 3A1� - 3A4 • '• HEM _-. - - D a ' , 1�� I \� 1 A� 3A48 SURVEY ,A-1207 10 A2ciikt 3 3A - �� 910N 41111/4, NOR t _ L Q �5 6. -� . T ��3A3 ' ' 1G lc •.1 ICY T—1-"" erid 9 :: AGf8i3iAc\4.76 Ac -- ® 1G3 tl o a Gu��13T_1 �! FpRp �,,�' . , tc2 URVEY A-1134 " O D �� �� rr ~. tE D I 0 E. l� \`/1'! C ICI(r r . • �,` 1 S F-1 A 4iR�►EY A-35 o 1C1 1C -r� 1F 84.22 Ac 2Ac 3.79 Ac -ppN c A;� 9.03 Ac `_' 161 32.8 Ac • 4.3Ac 1;- 1E 1 D � t F 3.85 Ac 1E1 1D1 0 ; 1- I z ADJACENT IN IG to tFt�t 1 J t EAST DOVE ST. 7.36 OWNERS 2.15 1.87 2 Ac 1F1 'i i 2Rt pR2' ' '4R1'4R 1A3 ;< 1B3C \ 1. Sparks, P. f - - J. . - - �A t 1 J '- r Oi' — 6.2 Ac — 2. Schelling, M. Spin #2 Representative we 3. Ferguson, S. Martin Schelling �_� sin - 4. Calli, M. ' 5. Riemenschneider, J. (v- -1 6. Thacker, K. "- 1A2 11.33 Ac 7. Sorg, K. • 1E 8. Stanford, M. 181 8.645 Ac 9. Harris, B. 5.9 Ac 10. Hays, B. 1c 1 a Y A-1620 8E-4 1 - II IA1 \ \ 1I i-� aa., SN�R City of Southiake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 95-93 Review No: Two Date of Review: 11/03/95 Project Name: Preliminary Plat-Solana.Phase I,54.99 Acres out of the James B.Martin Abst.#1134, and the Reis D. Price Survey Abst.#1207 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER: MTP-IBM Phase II &III Joint Venture Bury&Pittman D.F.W..Inc. Nine Village Circle, Suite 500 • 5310 Harvest Hill Drive. Suite 100 Westlake. Texas 76262 Dallas.Texas 75230 Phone: (817)430-0303 Phone: (214) 991-0011 Fax : (817)430-8750 Fax : (214) 991-0278 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/24/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Label the ownership,zoning,and Land Use Designation(L.U.D.)of the property located north of Kirkwood Boulevard and northwest of the project site. 2. Consult with the City Engineering Staff on construction of the cul-de-sac and landscape area at the intersection of Streets 'B' and'C'. 3. The Subdivision Ordinance requires astreet into the following boundary lines of the project: A. The northwest boundary adjacent to Lots 1-11, Block 2. B. The most northerly south line adjacent to lots 24-28, Block 2, and Lot 2 Stanford Place Addition. 4. Provide drainage easements in accordance with the Preliminary Storm Sewer and Drainage Plans. Consult with the City Engineering Staff on location, size, and any additional easements which may be required. Please note that all water, sewer, and drainage easements must be a minimum of 15' in width and offset into one lot. * Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial,they appear to meet the intent of this requirement. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Bury & Pittman D.F.W., Inc. MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture G:\WPF\REV\95\95-093PP.WPD 8E-5 L L L 7 _ , r - • C F i 1 ..._,_.., li 1111 NO! iiii nig = -,, :- g n ,..:. . i . Alog A i.114..1 .......,:i larii u 0 [I _ _ I . I '311 i i I i I:11 i pimp mu: ill iii 1 iii ' ; i fi i iwkto :7---on ti 1 Of ill tp ..a I ji 1 ..-• , ii. R ii. t -I/ "i i /i it 2 2 I ; E4 E ftgirta 1 -----fi li -I j i i lia: *a:iii: i il fAii : la x' • itgill ..AB A 1 . 1 - • --- - -1-.: 10, ' 0 " - ,•3- i...4 ;.t tx A( 4P•0 '''' jit gf &-L". --. 1,-7' 1,4, - i a Si .. , n''' 1'9' ... . amm.l.' ' • 1 ••• P -' /11.Ap A , , . k V , •1.-, 'AA.., V V 1% , Iii i Pi : •I. f A-" , 0 ..r, \-\TNI\MA , „ 4 \‘,F11 Frliii,1 :•' ,-- kJ " ,....ii a, - tf, • ..trig,..4100---,:;, ....s...:111111.t. ..; ,,e- . _.--- _*.,.......,..r1....„... .3_,..... .4.. se „mown... 1 . . 1; : I ., , , :: . i fiel ordig= - 4.7,--.. i p q 111:51 N.,...,. . 1 t 1. uk• , .A„ ,,.. 'aWki.imp_4-. loft.- ' 44 lit :40 '47,.&04k .,:i-eil 2,-/-s 'As1'4411.-.SP"i*A- :•'-^‘ • I `i la- . ....; id rje____ __________-....giait - ':-...- •flago' ' --* -a._4 41 I I 411;41,Ur. Wilklati)1 In Al I 1. . 1. ii,...se_._ •____„_-,"'" L. . .....)1c. VW%I '''''''"""*. 11 ' _..---.7-4+7.y...,4.0•.,.., 1 i 4 ? . 211 't•••,,.1 24 I I 1'`'.. . IMI.;.;>:446,11ar"M's'•.1V-.0/ I i 5 „, p uhre ..tk./, , , , h I M.P......."N,,,, ,,401tR,,.,.›.p v ii %.j " • rit (40 rt •j ••••.,,,,1 gh,„1411V ...:141t.. Iii Iket, 2.14 7%I.,Tli ,4,1114 nits Itetiap.V: , oe _vh , ,.....,1•••• 1 4..13 .0" ''. 14, X 111 i .." 1 1 4 I 1 r • I ," 44 yr ' 4 IS !' .0". r \ II, ii 1. . i Mis..-cham-- . .--1 r ' ! .e,'• I I 1., I • A. h is I e 1 -, i t." _I I /_i_ . 1 ;. —NI 1 \i I I 141. 1 / I t•k:1•:.:,,,r,*\::4,N,.. \II ir 1:ht. , -4,.... . 'W.. I • . , . { . , . .. . . I 2 I 1 1 - • . ' ' i - 3 • 1 i I 2 /a ..411 iris i a IL I a 2. 1 II A uppilif VI ijI.I (1150, ; r I Mil Til 11 At E 1 ---pq 641 P 1 el;ill 1 1 IN Ng aii OM 114 111 itli pri 0 ri g in 1 4 i 1 I re.i it 1 if 21-.2> 1. ' il II VI PigX3'''1 iii ;)I,;p;P.411 ell Ill'1411314'1141. CD II F A, I ix 1 x ric ' c-,`" --- Oil!LI ha. .:h.ixi.,N.-i li.ribt-,..iiiiii.111,..1; 4 -. Jai i q h xi:!I•Ni al 1 di:24i!I Al MI 4 i 1.'i .114 5.% n pi.- if ; It .1 • 1 5 i i: /.. ;1,.•:. 0 - i,„.. r jig' I i 1 ,t.6 '''s .:-.3' 11 VII! iiv II 1111:11111111 I 1 131111 NI 1 f I IP ! IP ! I i 'I III° d ..1 I lilt i gi -° ii ; 1 5 a 'a il : "i: It i: 'p • it ! il • ? - I IF : kiti . , . -i . .....\ i Ili g ,.——-- ---- - City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-187,First Reading ZA 95-77,Rezoning and Site Plan/Stacy Furniture Warehouse REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse, 5.66 acres legally described as Block B, Lot 2, Commerce Business Park LOCATION: 280 Commerce Street, approximately 180' South of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) OWNER/APPLICANT: James R. Stacy d/b/a Stacy's Furniture CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow"I-1" Light Industrial uses as set forth in Ordinance No. 480, Section 26 and the retail sale of furniture LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO. NOTICES SENT: Four(4) RESPONSES: One (1)written response received within the 200 feet notification area: • Steve D. Pritchett, 2821 E. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor P & Z ACTION: August 17, 1995;Approved to Table(7-0),ZA95-77,Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse until the September 7, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the public hearing. Due to Resolution 95-24 (case limitations), the Commission was unable to take action on this item. September 7, 1995; Approved to Table (7-0), ZA95-77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse until the September 21, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the Applicant's request and continue the public hearing. (kIL September 21, 1995; Approved to Table (7-0), ZA95-77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse until the October 19, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the Applicant's request and continue the public hearing. 8F-1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK LRDINANCE NO. 480-187, FIRST READING A95-77, REZONING AND SITE PLAN NOVEMBER 3, 1995 PAGE 2 October 19, 1995; Approved (7-0), ZA95-77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse, subject to Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated October 13, clarifying items#1 (mezzanine floor areas should be included in the Site Data Summary)and#2 (north building's floors areas);deleting items #4A(5'-A bufferyard on the South),#4B (10'-F1 bufferyard with minimum 6' stockade fence on the West), and #5 (interior landscaping area okay as shown, but require ground cover); ensuring #6 (provide architectural renderings or elevations of the proposed structures) is submitted which will have to meet the masonry requirements; accepting number of parking spaces as shown; and deleting#8 (location of trash dumpsters). STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the Plan Review Summary No.4 dated October 13, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated November 3, 1995. Below is a list of deviations from the zoning ordinance for the proposed retail/warehouse use: • The 177 parking spaces shown appears to be approximately 54%of the required 329 parking spaces based on staffs understanding of the space utilization. • Due to an existing paved driveway on the West,the required bufferyard along this side may need to be waived. This area is also platted as a public utility, drainage, and access easement. • It appears that the applicant proposes only a partial bufferyard on the South. • It appears that the interior landscape area shown will be less than the approximate 11,756 s.f. area required by the landscape ordinance. • The dumpster location and screening do not meet ordinance requirements of side or rear locations with screening on all four(4) sides. • Based on the "footprint" shown, it appears that the lot coverage is 50%, meeting the maximum allowed. • The driveway entrance throat lengths do not meet the Driveway Ordinance No. 634 which would require 100' depending on the number of required parking spaces. Although this property has access on F.M. 1709,the plans were submitted to the City on July 21, 1995 (prior to the adoption of the Corridor Study on L, August 1, 1995). KPG/ls G:\W PFIMEMO\CASES95\95-77ZS.1 CC 8F-2 ` �. wRot:r A-101• S. Lf r#rr'dtx ve+r1e + - frhll-1-1 �I -Tyr,/ K n 5 282 28 283 2B9 265 2810 1284, 311 r t - -501 f� 20 2C X 2L 2I1 21- 2J 2P �t' 01 -1 A-Irr-• . �' p riE wo 1 l I :� ? COPA 2K II a 2E 2D 2R 2w ` ammo. / J� i 5 7.:oLul A 2A1 2A - -- _ • a C NEN K - 582 � .�2�/-6 Y ,OOp P T 582C 888k _Gu__ _ • 2A2 IND�N • 2A1A A 5 L- -AGR--- 2A18 5828 562A Ttit)IM A E/,s.�ER 1 ,%�;tH-.111111111161 c�I LSW LS 183 1B IN I N; f -yFr A-!SA e � 111 D NORTHWEST " ©® ' EAST �� " 6 I 20 2E3 ® r - rair 2E al 1pm I. I M® EMI Mp,N KIM` �- Di _J-_ --J I 2E3A \ I7°' --i MA'YFIEL , , AIrs,.1 11 , --Igloo'vivel G i, A _ 40,��383 ?--``` ` .5. i .Ii��G ¢.000 uwc 2E5 2 ��� EAST SOU111LAK[ BLVD. 3418 j' .41. 11 1 2 28 mu 182 18 E 1 L-r + I �;, slie N ( l� I�. '--1 I__ I I ' Jilt ,I 1 11 1 : ♦ R•N �» K © z( 15 Ac e O L11 28 e I e ,,,, lL.,=A , , �� ir: a \?, 181�• PR 2A2 ��J /6AIAI I y 2A3 262A 2 2AtA 2A18 :� 1 ,p -, 31 2A. /vi 5r dill __ A 1209 Ac IC f1 ` 2A3A Alt©3A L,i �• ��b� 302 3D` - 11. ,IA 118I� 1�9 ID C� �, I" �� �1: c IlL I t j��iE 23A ,� g °w 4acI IQs i-A. < BN' r ilk '�YSURA1: A-474 I I __-- 'I_ .J 13.6 Ac ,'N I-•OAKS-- 5 5A IN� J` , GO? I y Of ci-s 3D I,D I 1.1 g lir 8 ,x, c jfI I D 6c 4A1 ---- Y a ;_. pAl Liminom �` �" EN1EK • - 2; r ItD5A1 - 1104 t-1 _.. — ; i 383 3 1 GRAPEVINE CITY LIMIT • l J 6 1.1 3 Ac 6.15 Ac / // I wal5mlu � 1 GR�ENI� Us►NEgs 681 R E51 It:;'1, EN .BARK , rrfi PARK 6C 60 6E 81).'- - �' --- ; Ir GN- ���K �` \ M�DpYt 61 Ac INDUs1RtL / d•--PK'" -. . ICI - . 6P IA,18 , ` I ``\ 4A 1 4, EMS ,ewo ❑j IBIA • \. 1 E EMI 1 Om,p 86c2 I 'Ac J ��Ilk rQ© M lea 186E t 382 R ` f^,, ,�©© � let _ o :2 i L r \ — I ®cam ' I e ;-_t" ®© _ FINAITION l-- 1,_ mei EMI ADp to r IIMY u::1 WV} , 1AI, Ell Lui MI II '` 2 TRACT MAP 183 IBIS r ' POAD IISON DDE0I EG t5A< - ,- �/� I_ 5 �1 A-.fA SLANG 5U . 0T L II 1 ( IIi ;1 / -- 30 Ac M5.1A- =_- 8F-3 _-_-j1_.__l,_--\_-1L -\,�' I I -- S�ANG ° ° QNI 1 �\ k I I .� ,) JI_ i JL, .iu vv I l Spin #7 Representative `` Peter Sporrer 1i 3: VD 931 331 State of Texas I 3A2 L-- . 3 A ,,I-1"- • - . 2 "I-1" J. Gregory ../ . - Z-- - • - "AG" pr 13 - W -7-c-0-\ R. Pack JS. Pritchett Cr W 0 U "I-1" i\-- i% 1,11 Aro, . Ihmew 0 r , ....,,,, . %A ... . _ ---1 - UR VE Y A -.. 4 7 1 J R. Pack I „I-1„ "I-in 5A n "I-1" i R. Pack . . — . — . _ 11,3 "I-1" 0(6, _ . _ . ___ . _0_ r —J ADJACENT OWNERS . AND ZONING — . — . - --1 \ S \ij ' 8F-4 J - - . i CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-187 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING O$DINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON .1 CERTAIN TRACT OR T 9/. CTS OF LAND WITHIN THE • TY OF SOUTHLAKE, T XAS BEING H! .� yeti • „ ORE FULLY AND COMPLETE t DESCRIBED IN BIT "A" ffi;n 11?, � N n1 � S 6" 3 • 01) � d �� ��.,R�7DF,7�U }�q � p • � '. �: , SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC ir IRE i.► : CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCERRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP• PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES/AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN E;PROVIDING kir i THAT TINS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CU A IVE OF ALL IN ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABIL Y CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVI ING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as tl-laltitaildittiffig Districttunder the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and G:\ORD\CASES\480-I87.I RD Page 1 8F-5 • (re WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: LSection 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City G:\ORD\CASES\48O-187.IRD Page 2 8F-6 (iv of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 5466 acre tract of land situated in the B ° toimmrq : '" s Pea), and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein,from a _ is itim6� $ lea ug iv " :ra,�° - :01-6 i 7f1 n r - ^ , vr s wt a i o f i ; as O;om al E%B@B ;;0.;�, ,,it, , CP Oil, S l t' s! s 6 ro0 9! 8 P a e �"�n��� a", . w.� - aYs, Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. thlw Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or G:\ORD\CASES\480-187.1 RD Page 3 8F-7 Le refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY C G:\ORD\CASES\480.187.1 RD Page 4 8F-8 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L G:\ORD\CASES\480-187.IRD 8F-9 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" Block B, Lot 2, Commerce Business Park C G:\ORDICASES\480-187.I RD Page 6 8 F-10 i is 10 i c p k e. 1 a i• .:, � .•...,.,.•. may .� � 4 1. .: .': . . Ill . . .• •1 • '• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •'•'•' ,- ... . • r •M 1i! trY . . . . . .- uv'n tr lr I •I I I $° - _ /. . ; r e a I. _ i i _ lit::. /a — • • • •• 1' 0,11SPC[fl•r'1rl I I I I 11r w . • 1 \.\.\ti I i l II [n•en•r.1r 1i1''' r Y .1 0� F1 pia \Ai2- \ ,:..,:.i I r� / 1 \� \� : • • bt=e. e: ;sal: '1 :s; :i: •:j:\ 1 ---,II -r• • 3 1\\\\ .:.., .:1• • \ \ • ,\\\\\\\.. • !..[:.:.:43.- ).:.:.:.:.:).•:.:.N( •„,\ 14., 1=1,,L, :. ., :•:,:•: :::i::: 1,,,,i. I tu• 2 ii N I •:•1•:• ( a ..\\1.. . :.II. „... .0 . ;11) • • ' ' : ri 7R P"" L n O - 3 —i—# � .i fX C7 • m R • • • T• C 1-3 \ UR 'ilc xl • H m ►. . . • . . � \ :1�: : as h \I____ _ • `I I["I"I • `&16. N1LVW NINiti.h, : i ' INN Iiik • ' • i / '•:•I•:'i • 1E• 1 :::. • is K E E •:i:-: 1 j/ 1 i. •: 8.• o .t o ':I ' CI, a.7 NI gn't •'It1d 717. E i i�L1;; a� s..t\ ri ::: vl } '1''' : °.I i .vua.ln\\` . IF \� il ill' 1i1 ' k -1•cf•r ; ��C:61 L 1— - 1 :. 1 == {. . . . . . . . . :. :..: .T_ . . . .� �: : : : : : : : :': :':': : :':':':---:':•:•:•:•:-:':': :'I : I I I 5= .irr.`'d.Ld.r.r �'•1.:' ....finii0{SYiilL r p+.:....., .+ .1..+..++r.',.a.,�+.+,+ra.+,+.1,+,.,+.+,i pan..►�._._...�'.' C. . t. /. .r.ne nu •• •• . . • .�-• • ._r..22,1222 YJ�••• . . . " . . • • . • ............. _�_• f „i ' °it. ii.. ....... ;_-ess - a,trat a nu : a■•ss: w•_ .f / I , 2 a= ° ! as 11 !Ii>i liww ella;i �iEEai ► •3 e C 3 Cj F 122 E e.s.:---.. 'flnn'" nits it oo a a: ;i I�tta. g al.sp. 5~^ Rs \\ MUI ii.e1Fa �.a fiE !ai s a: a z Rii —:� il 1-i; Via LF^ x i:E 8 r i ----IR _Y''�_ z.3 3 k... 4 iii OH - SEAT- ;f= City of Southlake,Texas SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 95-77 Review No: Five Date of Review: 11/03/95 Project Name: Site Plan-Stacy Furniture Warehouse,Lot 2,Block B.Commerce Business Park OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Rick Stacy B. C. I. 1000 West Southlake Boulevard P.O, Box 171886 Southlake, Texas 76092 Arlington, Texas 76003 Phone: Phone: (817) 536-6050 Fax : Fax : (817) 536-8750 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/24/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Correct the Site Data information shown for building #7 to match that shown on the graphic. It appears that the Site Data information for building#7 should show#7-A(1st floor)as 30,000 s.f.,#7- B(mezzanine 2nd floor)as 15,000 s.f.,and#7-C should be deleted. Please note that although the floor areas for building#7 are depicted incorrectly in the Site Data Summary,it appears to show the correct floor area in total. 2. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards: A. A 5'-A bufferyard is required along the south property line. Due to existing concrete, the applicant has provided a partial 5'-A bufferyard 115' in length. B. A 10'-F1 bufferyard with minimum 6'stockade fence is required along the west property line; However,this area is currently paved with an existing driveway and a has an existing 6' chain link fence. 3. The project site does not appear to meet the interior landscape area requirements. Please note that although the required landscape area has not been met,it appears that the required plantings of Canopy Trees,Accent Trees,Shrubs,and Ground Cover are being provided based on the required landscape area. 4. Based on the apparent number of required parking spaces,the driveway entrance throat depths do not meet the depth requirements of the Driveway Ordinance No. 634 (100'driveway throat depth required). Based on the provided parking and number of driveway entrances, the driveway throat 5, depths do not meet requirements of the driveway ordinance(50'driveway throat depth required). 6. Trash dumpsters must be at the side or rear of the site and totally screened by fence,plantings or other suitable visual barriers. Label the type and height of screening around the trash dumpster. 8F-12 City of Southlake,Texas * This review is based on "I-1" Zoning District Regulations. Any revisions to the Site Plan as approved requires re-submittal and approval of the revised Site Plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. * The flag poles shown are above the maximum district height and will require Zoning Board of Adjustments approval. * Any proposed signs require a separate building permit prior to construction. * Landscape and irrigation plans meeting the requirements of Landscape Ordinance No.544 and Zoning Ordinance No. 480 (Section 42,Bufferyards)are required prior to issuance of building permit. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to the City Council meeting must be received at the City by 11/13/95. The revised submittal must include seventeen 24" x 36" blue line copies folded 6" x 9" and one 11"x 17"revised reduction. • * Denotes Informational Comment c: Rick Stacy B. C. I. G:\WPF\REV\95\95-077SP.WPD ` 8F-13 - -..........„ 5 I • .. . •. •• ::. . . P t in LI ::A:4":.• .t.i.,.•. . . . . . sla . i r i !!;; ,-... ::r•*.N--.7..-7.-1• '1'-i--:-.-..-44:_.::..;:• • ...... iii IIIIIIIIIIIaianna.,,„.,,,,.:..2 ,• :.....\-.,•:*.•,1::*-' ;07'.::.:-:::.•::::. ai „...1 ..,,, ii.....;42.......__,„„mmi: I I I.... . ..‹. . II I • .•.•.•.•.• • • • - '''A.61 I.4‘-MMIZU-...M11111111.Illl: I IC %Pi 3'i :.l•:.r:,..• :i[.:.:::......:.:::. I .• r.* ••••••••••••'..,-..4:1,..:•:•:•:i.......... . . . . . . . .. . . , 1111111111111111111fti. . . . . . . . . . . . . .....;-:'7:-.. • • i . . . . . . . is P E.!.:.'•:•:•:. 51.,:-...•...-... . . . . . 2 ; 17110011•V a It . .aaa 1••,2 . . . . ; a • • 1111 1 ' !"., ._ 1 1 C:•-7.: 12 0. If•'i / • •.....• a l•..• i •-• 1 ti . .: 11:-: i "-•4:::• E 1 a ar 1 t•.. i •:•:....• ik . .•.4.T. • 1 • / r• :-:•••'•••: AV I I I : :•:i is ..._: ..,.._ .. •.-. r\rZ:limns•r le lorr P •il• • X . •.•.•.•.• N„. .v. 1 L 1 1 I 11 tiles jr.L. _ kill*::t.:• "-:1- 11 -74. ;-••.'••••:*-'°i •'•'•••••••W•'•'•••'•'i• . • •: 2 / 2 _. . ••.• ••I :•.'• ... n-.- I . ' V1/7v4mt33.x,. •i=1.N.`1 I:1 3 1 X\NN 0.N.1 r/NI A ANN 0113a • .• • .• .X.... ...4 . . . /a • i 11 • • . gill, ..iiii 1 1 1 1.: i. ; a f•t•::-.ill PN . . . . . . , 22to... b. 7 F1? r•m .41.0 1 •.rl t.-1- Z 1 •:11.: -Li . , -.. • • • a .11.. • s .• a ••••••••k N\"1. :4-. ."ZESP r "...le ..t• . .1.5 .i.▪ g 4 -4-1 .......-: . k g.: L'• I fan: PlEx '-'1'1" :.t.• • &- giN \;\'•.::::: :111\ ILl' -'s I i '.•-7,• •,.• v.. :a. % ••1:.k•: : ' ,,\„,, N „,L ,,.\„`k•N,.. •• 3 k . •.• •.• :/:•:.,..- --ir ra tz; IwIL . • • _ i :•:•:(1):•:•:•:...:•:: . :•:i:•: g, PC e\Ak I ]::: ' ‘,. ......... k ,1\ai ••••••••• _lk „, I ' i ' • • • • • --. - 3 ••.•:1::.' .1 .•.•.•.•. . , a1 ;1 \ I/ .•••.•.•. -A :•N E 21, 4. i • • • • G. N Z '• n::::: • :1 1 ; 'il I X . .1 . .• . a"I , , ....• •.• f. :i.k.: ..:1.1.:..,• .:t:2.•:ffc•y -: •:-.•..•.2\..• 2 Fr. :-I:'.•;N.'••• . .-••I X• i ; E NA\..\ :14:•-?. .4 74. 6 -.-I-.}as •12 ; A.A.••I5 • r ..-- I iii ••••. :1.• Et: 2 . . F., 7,,rt -RX-, •IP::::**f••.• - x •' ••• *\ lit n 2 . . . . ......... ii.: I 1.1:::::: - 1 S'•"' a. 1•''.":': .I.1 4 :•:•.•.•.\ :l s :::j V 3 1 ,. -t_. ‘..4 :•:11: 2 ;:*:: -r."--1 / :•(s.:•:- •:::•:•:- V ..-"' * -kit.IP,' -I. -:!--11 . . . - --1 i • • • • • • • • • •. . . . . k . . . . . . • • • - •. . . . . . . 3 3. : /14 ... . . . . . . -I • • • 3 to .1 . :.: ... . . . • • •.• •.• .., ..,, i i .•:•:•:•.• • il " \ \\*\ -4 • • • . . : ..• P ; ....i.••:.....11...:::::1 . . . • • • .• . - .•:•:•rt p"' 1. 1 F ..•..•..::.• I : :•:•.• 11 j I •:, ., igi ,g • • • II if ,ill ii 4 ; •• •••••• !• . :•:f.• al 41 1 \ [5 :.• :::.: t 1111111 '- 2:kr l 'is,.\\. \ a• •••• . . . . ,...)•:( • • •- ... . . : ri T 1 2••:1:1 . .•.•. _ . .•.•. . 2 • Li 1, •1 • . . . . • •:::• • E E --; E 11 - i ••:.i•.•• .:tarit• . / :•:j:•:F iin i 11 ..... .,tr.s: ' . i• , low / •,1 11 ....... •:•.1•:• • •4••• , 11;.•: '-'2 • • •• . • a I 3.t% • • • 1'1% --14 • I.• 4 it ;a ::1•:. pp mu, i : -._:.::.• 1:. - i .. PIO , , -7 - I I I • 1 E a . g...n.. -:.11:•..'2" . s IL,•,\.\\:\ 13 --s---w „ . :.•. . . .. \ .. • /, s . .1, : : .: t i i law\ \\\- 1 \ i : : .•. • •1 ::1 I 1 1 •,• . • . . 1 1 1 n 1 neon .( ) 1 f ( r . . . . . . 1:) . ai•. 1•11114ne in*I 1 • • • • • • • • • • g p f r f 'r ) 17 999999 of.14. 4 • • • ) I I I I I I-1-.1-4-1J-I 4-1.4+-r I I I I • .:.: ..., \„is.:•. ':*•' ;•• . . . . . . . . . . .• •- ' ' • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . il • • L - ..........--.,..................1_thri0.14.1.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... Pi • • • • • " • • • • •...•.......•. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . .A . . . *.--!.........,..... . . . . . . , 4....1' MIMI, •-•••-•-•-•-.-i.."J"mr.2.-""- - -...-.---------..-.-,-,---....---. . .r_ . ,::. .... d•:•7 ':-6.--i it vivo I'll Him :R.,: g F.XX2XX Una" Ina 1 Min G; 4 Ili :In, a 115 n i ; - X_ gi i I 1 g 2 g II Mg WA/0 :MN XX;XXa PROA 1 0.: if 2: in"' i ran. a . . . . . . . . 11:11r g eih21211 12-iilii : g" " " "" :It: 0 2.• I: ill ........1 Ism gill • • ..1...11 6 . .rii:424 1.-4Z ; 3?. up i ak- ., a. ri. it zi. Ili, R.I. , litile I • pl Emil Pam. c safiD.F.,a p 6". p i 2- ' "2 ''s V I; _...... I: N!Fs 1 mil 11"1"1 i 51 1; will • - E. NE iki -2 2- GG ' a 11 4 __AV 7.5 ..r, eir WI. 5 Ipiir r---I.1 -211. '51 c''' it'i4t. OISCSS. l'iS a MEV II; 1P1I .' i 1: • i i 1 gs 31 *. :: 2 ' 2.2 22.... - '..... E 4nv- x 2.. q• •0 al. . .• a. "i. i 62..2 2 , -7 E P 1 •ii - . , . _ 8F-1 4 0...! City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tom Elgin, Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance No.483-D, First Reading, Proposed Amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 Attached are proposed revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-D. Many of these have been recommended by the Planning&Zoning Commission and City Council over the past few years. These revisions address various problems that have arisen over time, clarify the intent of the respective regulation, resolve conflicts between the subdivision ordinance and other ordinances and planning documents, and/or help implement the City's geographical information system (GIS.) On October 19, 1995, the Planning&Zoning Commission approved draft#4 of the proposed c y revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-D with minor amendments by a vote of 7-0. The attached revision in ordinance format incorporates those amendments. The proposed changes in this revision are indicated in redline and strikeout format. Also attached is a"clean"copy of the revision. Please place this item on the next City Council agenda for their consideration and first reading. 1 att: Proposed revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-D G:I WPFIMEMOLSTAFFICEH1483D CC.WPD Cr' 8G-1 ORDINANCE NO. 483-D AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AMENDI NG ORDINANCE NO. 483, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; REQUIRING INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED ON PLATS; PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN EASEMENTS; PROVIDING AMENDMENTS TO CONFORM TO STATE LAW; AMENDING CURVILINEAR REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING AMENDMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN; ELIMINATING CONFLICTS WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE; REQUIRING MONUMENTS AND INFORMATION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S GIS SYSTEM; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL OTHER ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the •• of Southlake, Texas is a home rule c'• mg under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 483, as the Subdivision Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to amend Ordinance No. 483 to conform to other ordinances of the City and to provide more complete information on plats submitted to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. Paragraph B, Section 1.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding and deleting definitions as follows: r44a\ L '' E',E. .; _€.; .s p, L ��. ...t6, 1% k ?b �A k,',9@E��3 1 , fi C? ,1,1; 6 �.`m..':. �,'_� `t $61�3 ✓k,�#°w »-,n�.- `�� r)11T6E t- �+an.. 4i $a kd " fi #k6 @ " k n k� 6:. 3k8ir° �8l,k ! f1 Ck a `�iF 3 �k sk&t k � k�i `5€ k'( 3��'w ? ':� "'t:e&"""/B . � y'; r,,s •y' .�, g a ��� PE, cr�c:r "'''c erf ti f zxxs,, € ,:h '1 a&c"�.. 4S8C"� „,cs � 8zAc a part ,va t �(e ® S€a! � ���� ®m�! ti t ¢_ ,� ff�� c3 3 Er ,g° 1";;., 5 !. 8G—2 (ime fer-the-Purreserwhether-immediate-er-futtmer of-t-ramsfer-ef-ownership-er-for-building other-:" SECTION 2. Paragraph A, Section 2.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "A. Any person desirous of combining two or more contiguous previously platted lots into one single lot-for-the-p try removing `interior lots , shall submit PlattRevis Q ffeasemmen - @ �At o Amended Platpf easements are,to'"remain} previouslylade and obtain approval as outlined in this ordinance and r cause the same to be filed of record in the County Plat Records." SECTION 3. Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "D. The Preliminary Plat shall contain the following information: 1rt ® + . North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. is Permissible scale: 1"=50', 100', or 200'. (Prefer 1"=100') 34. Location map showing location of tract by references to existing streets or highways. 45. Appropriate title, i.e., "Preliminary Plat", to include subdivision name, City, County, State, Surveyand Abstract, totalgross acrea a ' t}', g � r _ lots and date of preparation. 5 :. Name and address (phone optional) of record owner and subdivider if different. Note volume and page of current deed record ownership. 67. Standard approval block. 7- . Name, address and phone of Engineer/Planner/Surveyor. T . Name of record owner and corresponding deed record volume and page for all adjacent unpiatted tracts within 200 feet, to include owners across any adjacent ROW(Amended Ord.No. 483-A) • All adjacent platted prop erty�a"������` ���,��' shown in dashed lines, labeling lot and block numbers, subdivision nam- and plat record :.,. ... Location of City Limit Lines and/or extraterritorial jurisdiction lines. Slake\ordinanc\483-d -2- 8G-3 12. Existing zoning noted on this tract and adjacent tracts. This should be (ire removed on any Final Plats. 13. All existing easements on or adjacent to this tract shown and labeled as to type and size. +3 . Any adjacent, previously approved and currently valid preliminary plats! or concept plans ; ' fc shown. +415. The location of existing or approved street intersections on the perimeter of the subdivision or within 200 feet of the perimeter. 1-516. Legal description of the land to include: Current owner's deed record reference, survey and abstract, .L41 POB tied to survey corner or previously filed subdivision corner, or USGS monument, gross acreage. +6j7. Point of beginning labeled on plat. 1- 18. Graphic depiction of all boundary lines shown in heavy lines with deed record dimensions or field surveyed dimensions if available. These should match legal description. 19,. Existing ROW shown,labeled and dimensioned,i.e.public streets,highways, alleys, private drives,railroads, etc. Cie -1920. Existing traveled roadway widths. 28 . General outline of area embraced by tree cover. 2-1-M. Permanent structures and uses within the subdivision that will remain. 22-23. Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line. A 10' U.E. should be provided along the ROW of S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, and F.M. 1938. 23 . Street ROW dimensioned, all streets having names dissimilar from any existing street names. 24 . ROW dedication for existing ROW widening shown and dimensioned. 2526. Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order. 2627. Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned.(Amended Ord.No. 483-A) 28. Front building setback lines(on all streets)labeled or noted. Fifty-foot(50') front building line required adjacent to State Highway 114, F.M. 1709, and F.M. 1938. (Amended Ord.No. 483-A) : Lots to be dedicated for public use labeled as such, i.e. schools,parks, open spaces,etc.,showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions. Also show any private uses in same manner. Slake1ordinanc\483-d -3- 8G-4 2930. Any proposed zoning labeled as such. 303=1. Schedule addressing p g hasin of development as shown on the plat, with estimated beginning and completion data for each phase, to include quantitative land use schedule. Typically shown as follows: Land Use Schedule. Phase One LAND USE ZONING #OF #OF GROSS DENSITY NET LOTS UNITS (D.U./ACRE) ACREAGE Single Family Residential SF-lA 40 40 1.0 40.0 Single Family Residential SF-20A 40 40 2.0 20.0 Commercial Center C-3 - - - 5.8 Park AG - - - 15.0 Streets - - - - 25.0 Phase One Subtotals 80 80 1.5 105.8 Phase One expected completion date: July. 1991 1 kr.,4 ® w . .f all lots, street ROW, easements, (we etc ' i Y ` (, € ( e a 511 Its x ml�m '` K a Approximate flood plain and flood way limits shown. 330. Additional plans required: a. Preliminary Drainage Study: Shall include all requirements as outlined in the Drainage Ordinance of the City including but not limited to the following: 1. Shall be drawn over a mylar or reproducible copy of the Preliminary Plat. 2. Provide the name, address, and phone number of the person preparing the study. 3. Provide the signature and seal of the person preparing the study. 4. Contours in conformance with the following: -Slope less than 2% : 2' vertical intervals -Slope 2%to 15% : 5'vertical intervals -Slope greater than 15% : 10'vertical intervals *Datum should be approved by the City Engineer. Label all existingand proposed drainage structures,i.e.,dams, 5. P Po spillways,flumes,culverts, and note size and type, i.e. earth, concrete,riprap,metal,RCP,VCP,etc. Slake\ordinanc\483d -4- 8G-5 6. Flow lines of all drainage and water courses, i.e. streams, (II"Pe creeks, swales, etc. 7. Delineation of on-site and contiguous off-site drainage areas including acreages thereof This should include a contour map of the entire drainage area contributing runoff to the subdivision. Scale should not be smaller than 1" =2,000'. 8. Sufficient design calculations to determine easement sizes and locations. b. Preliminary Water and Sewer Layout: Shall include: 1. Existing and proposed water lines with sizes shown. 2. Existing and proposed sewer lines with sizes shown. *These may be shown on Preliminary Plat, drainage study, or separately whichever would be more legible. SECTION 4. Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "D. The Final Plat shall contain the following information: III § s�� a Gyt c ` a o r as �. 'ji .twK 4 . North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. . Permissible scale: 1"=50', 100'. (Prefer 1"=100') Sheet size shall be 24" x 36". (Amended Ord.No. 483-A) 3 . Location map showing location of tract by references to existing streets or highways. 45. Appropriate title, i.e., "Final Plat", to include subdivision name, City, County, State, Survey and Abstract,total gross acreage,number of lots, and date of preparation. (Amended Ord. 483-A) 56. Name and address of record owner and subdivider if different. Note volume and page of deed record ownership. 6 . Standard approval block. 48. Name, address and phone of Surveyor. $ . Name of record owner and corresponding deed record volume and page for all adjacent unplatted tracts within 200 feet, to include owners across any adjacent ROW(Amended Ord.No.483-A) ,.. All adjacent platted prope §:s <- °� � shown in dashed lines, labeling lot and block numbers, subdivision name, _ and plat record - :. ,: Slake\ordinanc\483-d -5- 8G—6 Cr, 11. Any djacent,\prreeviousl3riapprov .and currently valid pre iminary'plats conceptplanstoi a lop . -1-94 . Location of City Limit Lines and/or extraterritorial jurisdiction lines, all survey lines with survey names labeled. -HIS. All existing easements on or adjacent to this tract shown and labeled as to type and size }›.*sA"1 k.'.;11 '1 i Y b6t—ndaW4 dime tar,. cgrre . 441€4. The locationS*iittfitaiilthiOS and dimensional centerline references to existing or approved street intersections on the perimeter of the subdivision or within 200 feet of the perimeter. 41 . Legal description of the land to include current owner's deed record reference, survey and abstract, ,1:i POB tied to survey corner or previously filed subdivision corner, or USGS monument, property corners labeled as to pins/rods, found or set with sizes shown, and gross acreage. 44 . Point of beginning labeled on plat. � � tan with $ 03(B) (hoe 431s. Graphic depiction of all boundary lines shown in heavy lines with a description that matches legal 4-6p. Existing ROW shown,labeled and dimensioned,i.e.public streets,highways, alleys,private drives, railroads, etc. 4420. A 50' building setback line provided for S.H. 1140 e F.M. 1709 Mid F.M. 1938 unless greater setback.setbackliS required by zoning. :. Net acreage noted on each lot. (sq. ft. if less than one acre) 4-92 . Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line. A 10' U.E. should be provided along the ROW of S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, and F.M. 1938. Street ROW '+ , "' ! t ` , all streets having free # % ' ' ° �fs m e s names dissimilar from any existing street names. . ROW dedication for existing ROW widening shown and dimensioned, provide dimensions from center of existing ROW at all adjacent property corners. (er . Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order. Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned. 8G-7 Slake\ordinanc\483-d ,� 2427. Front building setback lines(on all streets) labeled or noted. (kore 2-528. Lots to be dedicated for public use labeled as such, i.e. schools, parks, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and calculated perimeter dimensions. Also show any private uses in same manner. 2629. Calculated dimensions of all lots, street ROW, easements, etc. ; 1 curve data should be labeled. xl IC t1 � 1 C ;fr ‘e. € gi zoning district 2430. Flood plain limit shown and labeled. Flood way limit shown and labeled with dimensional ties to all lot corners. 2&31. Reproducible acknowledgments, owner's dedication, endorsements and surveyor's certifications in accordance with the official forms on file in the City Secretary's office. (see appendix) 2932. Avigation easement shown if applicable. (see appendix) 34333. Minimum finish floor elevations shown on all lots impacted by drainage easements or intended to be filled. Finish floor note shown on plat. (see appendix) 34-34. Statement concerning deed restrictions shown. (see appendix, only for (halw amended plats) 1 320 Flowage Easement note shown on plat if applicable. (appendix) 33 . Sight triangle note shown on plat if applicable.(Section 8.02)(Amended Ord. No. 483-A) 3437. Driveway access limitation note provided if applicable. (Section 5.01-H) mil. Ill b, ®: 1 0 �` I .i t E ! 1 1 —Pt:11E..; • dil -r ,1114 1�`P S 1 1 ( 1 � 1 1 11� � 1 Q I k @aro ,`i Yam€ ; I. `t 1i � :' 4 1 �f �". *:IN.', ir 339,. Additional plans required: a. Complete and corrected preliminary water and sewer layout. This may be combined with the drainage study and should show all intended easements. b. Final Drainage Study: Shall include all requirements as outlined in the Drainage Ordinance of the City including but not limited to the following: 1. Shall be drawn over a mylar or reproducible copy of the (kar Preliminary Plat. 2. Provide the name,address,and phone number of the Engineer preparing the study. Slake\ordinanc\483-d -7- 8G-8 3. Provide the signature and seal of the Engineer preparing the (Fe study. 4. Label the location and elevation of the topographic benchmark. Datum should be approved by the City Engineer. 5. Contours in conformance with the following: -Slope less than 2% : 2' vertical intervals -Slope 2%to 15% : 5'vertical intervals -Slope greater than 15% : 10' vertical intervals 6. Label all existing and proposed drainage structures i.e.,dams, spillways, flumes, culverts, storm drain and note size and type, i.e. earth, concrete, riprap, metal, RCP, VCP, etc. 7. Flow lines of all drainage and water courses, i.e. streams, creeks, swales, etc. 8. Delineation of on-site and contiguous off-site drainage areas including acreages thereof. This should include a contour map of the entire drainage area contributing runoff to the subdivision. Scale should not be smaller than 1" =2,000'. 9. Sufficient design calculations showing final easement sizes and locations. (of 10. Some drainage areas may require the applicant to generate computer evaluation models (i.e. HEC I, HEC II, etc.) as determined by the City Engineer and Director of Public Works. Should these runs be required, an additional fee sufficient to cover the City's cost of review will be charged the applicant. The fee shall be designated the "Computer Drainage Study Review Fee" as outlined in the current Fee Schedule adopted by City Council. 3640,. Additional Support Documents required: a. A percolation test for each lot which will not be served by City sewer. b. Completed Developer's Agreement (prior to construction of utility and drainage improvements) c. Certificate of taxes paid from the City Tax Collector d. Certificate of taxes paid from the Tarrant County Tax Collector e. Certificate of taxes paid from the Local School District Tax Collector f. Any proposed or existing deed covenants/restrictions (se g. Any proposed Homeowner's Agreements and/or Documents." slake\ordinanc\483-d -8- 8G-9 SECTION 5. Paragraph A, Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "A. General: 1. Easements for utilities, drainage, walkways� � and other comparable purposes shall generally be located along the side or rear or front lot lines and/or drainage flow lines and shall be labeled "Utility Easement", "Drainage Easement", " ``° r •- Access Easement", "Common Access Easement", c - or other specifically appropriate labeling on the Final Plat." � Easements for-. t " �� Mies shall be a minimum i of ten feet (10') ' �� " . eV' br ` . feet 1�0 Y {•idth and�ma'( e centered on lot lines unless otherwise recommended by the City's Engineer. . Easements for drainage,under normal conditions, shall be measured from the centerline of creeks, ditches or drainage channels, and shall be of width sufficient to adequately serve the intended purposes. l The City may require, in order to facilitate access from roads to schools, (Iirse parks, playgrounds, or other nearby roads, perpetual unobstructed access easements for pedestrian or bicycle traffic. (01 Easements dedicated on the plat shall be deemed dedicated to the public and to the City of Southlake unless specified otherwise. i '€ - ��"} @ B $ IB;?pin ' ® t € ' tc 01 , !TB?' 1,19 @ �r,6 ,'Y g d�p , n:� � B SECTION 6. Subparagraph (B)10, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "10. All preliminary plats shall substantially conform to the Concept Pl" s=Ei approved in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning •r.mane of the City." SECTION 7. Paragraph F, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "F. Developer's Agreements: t t B° z B a , ,_ r-0°a' tility, street or drainage improvement construction or any public or private improvements shall be allow until C. £ .e €t F� $3 ati £: .' (.BB:G' 3$b 9Y 96(&i €„a�€' xl£- C6 5'. eve oper s agreement I • ,--n approv- s by(kw- < ' ouncil. —Mess- �xx:) s �'g'. s r r, 9 � 1.:3 6� •3 ) }f e4 , ? , €,,' .t i s€ �3r . - . - I waive .y se ounc upon a showing o g.•• cause. -8 a deve oper's agreement shall, among other things, address the physical public improvements, i.e. streets, water, sewer, 8G-10 Slake\ordinanc\483-d -9- storm drainage, street lights, street signs, and other applicable required services, (or features or facilities, which are to be installed in the subdivision. Such agreement shall be based on cost estimates thereof, prepared by the subdivider's engineer and reviewed by the City Engineer." SECTION 8. Subparagraph (A)1, Section 4.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "1. A In the cvcnt a public hearing shall be scheduled and due notification given for the hearing to be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission e:t , pjrovid 'ofi SECTION 9. Paragraph B, Section 4.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "B. Multiple-Lot Plat Showings: All multiple-lot Plat Showings will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant A M, ..,� t. - . 1. 0 'a a �' a a e * ®': W `p`S""'� Q 1 t':1( Ct �','✓� } Y.`4:;.i 6 � g q :.b.46111 �� II €3t o- a.,,x^>.. a x ' %� of thhe � .11 ,e 1 c". e Plat Showing accompanied by the plat review :,, � mom, �..,.� comments shalll then be sent to the Commission for recommendation and the Council for final action. Upon approval by Council, the Zoning Administrator will obtain the signature of the Commission Chairman and Secretary, and Mayor and City Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance." SECTION 10. Paragraph B, Section 4.05 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "B. Amended Plats with five or more lots: All Amended Plats with five or more lots will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. o °aa„ Aj.40 IA < lotlfl on : a. . ' t V4; e P a T ' : °C )1111 ", r , rat , � � � # ot� ik The Amend-s 'lat accompanied by the plat review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for final action. Upon approval by the Commission, the Zoning Administrator will obtain the signature of the Commission Chairman and Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance." SECTION 11. Section 4.06 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "Section 4.06 Plat Revision. Processing: 'IN f 1° 2 ts ✓ ¢3'c p o B G)t' .�i ' <yz F i t �k tl 62 t t i t l <�61 � (;da t..(;)t i i' 1.3 ill 'J&410V.€.,''t;Pt,) � f . ss 9 1bc-. fCt or ;w v.1e�m �3i' t e �f ' ,it C6�,4 �� tt Es . t 't E Sit,�� a �..)tea &( P� H ',d w rk ®.> e„ t P, rf )gc8t£ 8G-11 Stake\ordinanc\483-d -10- s 110.N 11) g4: "V{ c ,,fie fh r611 , i i 't cm ::10 (hire e s a ,rt� i ®r ewe r m is ��✓ ai` ,ce( r aka '� Q i � ^#�3^`��� e^ems:? ,+ � xmv3.d� �,.� _��':•.: 3�= d, a: •,fir:. y A. Plat Revisions shall be submitted to thc City, schcdulcd for rcvicw and B. Rcplats or revisions involving property whtels-durmr-tlie-.preeedtn- ears C. A plat revision of property which has not bce lot ancl-whielt-eontains-an-exeeeted-eertifieation-stating.-that-n.o-deed-restrietions by State Law. D. Exemptions. A public hearing shall not be required for a Plat Revision meeting (iire 1. Plat Revision of an original one lot plat which has not been subdivided. 2. The immediately precedingplat lat of the subdivision has been or rc p 3. All property owners within the previous subdivision join in thc rcplat-by 4. The proposed revision involves only a correction of error as described L Stake\ordinanc\483-d -11- 8G-1 2 SECTION 12. Paragraph A, Section 5.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "A. Street right-of-way shall be as shown in the Thoroughfare Plan and, where not shown therein, shall be not less than the following: STREET TYPE ROW WIDTH State/County varies (100'-500') Arterial Div __an s . 84' Arterials Fo divided4(A D) 90' Ante ial rr nd vid d(A4 70 Collectors- ..:$ : en divid (C2 60' Local Street non-residential 60' Local Street r "al) 50' SECTION 13. Subparagraphs (A)2-4, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, are amended to read as follows: (••• "2. $ t 11, a 1 t t# { t t' W t t iiefrq 0 1 z�ra t ice" oai.), t ,� t + �a 1 t1� 1 WuW" a s7e ? T;s, tt e t hi' 1.1WWr t>j 1 0,111,z,tt t* � i ® a € ' le r� i � ;;TO tt n Alt ECG ireAsAi.,a4,0)i}f 41 .10 " �o It v° ttt011 1 t1 tt „` , rat -4- t dr ,ee . t .' v ''.°a'E PCatt° tn.. Tta r9t tnt 9t� t *fitl � y $t rlh tto tbC8g � ? ,�u�, ,r5,,Es S $,,'i?c.r -Sat,4 '�`'^ffi���st.tt4r 3 't • ttPtiBt-$k . ' �• f �6 ,: .,G 4d t 31 €s s{; t t L L � ° ' street cente W.., 2. Thc maximum centerline radius for such streets shall be cight hundred fcct (800'). 3. All cul-de-sacs and block lengths of cight hundred fcct (800') or less shall 4. Thc requirements contained herein for the provision of curvilinear streets Slake\ord ant\483 -12- 8G-13 • SECTION 14. Subparagraph (F)1, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "1. Centerline Radius: The followings centerline radii shall be*the minusum tl^ e lsed in the design of all street construction: STREET TYPE MINIMUM RADIUS Arterials ! ldvd 1000' Mdraal; Fqu lan 0 0d v tyed ( 4U) 600' Collectors i Aidehw 400' Local Stree xd taLknodWxd As approved by City Engineer" SECTION 15. Subparagraph (F)2, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the �� Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: 411i "2. Common Tangents: Reverse Circular Curves having a common tangent shall be separated by a tangent section in accordance with the following table: STREET TYPE MINIMUM TANGENT BETWEEN CURVES Arterial "' ' . ! 200' uldelc , aE+ six_ o-s .'k .apt» -,t. P._ Arterials-P' !MAN 100' Collector` 'r3i" `c1 50' Local Stree As approved by City Engineer" L Slake\ordinanc\483-d -13- 8G-14 SECTION 16. Subparagraph (G)2, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "2. Maximum Grades: No streets shall be designed or constructed with grades in excess of the following: STREET TYPE MAXIMUM GRADE Arterial - Five !. ' .' a"vided°°• j u lane 6.0% divided Arterials Four laneundivided (A4 :; 8.0% Collector eTw,o?lane tndiviC.. E(C U) 10.0% Local Street (residential on. residential) As approved by City Engineer" SECTION 17. Subparagraph (G)3, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "3. Vertical Curve Lengths: In order to maintain adequate sight distance, the following minimum lengths of vertical curves shall be required: (kr STREET TYPE MAXIMUM GRADE Arterials iundividedle 6 50 feet for each algebraic 1-7 rstiM' percent difference in grade Arterial r�lane dt c 50 feet for each algebraic percent difference in grade Collector 50 feet for each algebraic percent difference in grade Local Street reside tial & non-._` iden;11,, As approved by City Engineer" SECTION 18. Paragraph B, Section 8.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "B. All lots, regardless of zoning or whether or not zoned, that are not served by a public or quasi-public community sewer system, shall contain a minim is _;: area - • . 2-.440 rsr to support a private septic tank and leach field. _' Works. A subdivision may, at the discretion of the Coimissiefir; be deemed to be served by a public sewer system if a Developer Agreement has been executed with the City outlining provisions for extending public sewer service to the development and providing for payment by the development of all required approach main, connection and impact fees necessary to acquire the service." S1ake\ordinan6483d -14" 8G—1 5 SECTION 19. Paragraphs D, E and F, Section 8.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "D. Allside lot lines shall be perpendicular to the ROW lines or radial in the case of a cul-de-sac or curvilinear design. E. A row or tier of lots having a minimum lot width of 125 feet at the rear property line shall be provided adjacent*, 1 any property that is currently zoned or platted residential and contains lots of one acre or larger 2. any property shown on the approved City Land Use Plan to be designated for lots of one acre or larger in size. F. For nth" urpose a ct o um lot 4w'd al f■ eee 1 goArdflectial . 1 .1 a le a = g g ' ti et o f malummed ement" (iise a ': wt's ." 04, 1 t',4" SECTION 20. Paragraph H, Section 8.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "H. All corner lots within the municipal city limits shall have setback lines on both streets as required by the Zoning Ordinance-unless SECTION 21. Section 8.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding Paragraph B to read as follows: r ; fit-n o - a " ivtt` e,"-t' 3 ve,"1;,(1. ti{ ��`� I N.6€,�Gtite s,�[ ( 1�� f�k � ( fl„� 4+� «a R G 9,t_le ( £lam 8 �`'( �� 6R €9 ® 1 at :b€ A Eq.: & r ""1 ,ka:41Z)",81c e(; £tt 1 1i SECTION 22. Paragraph C, Section 8.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "C. Installation of Monuments: Monuments shall be installed befor, the final plat. - - i '.: .-- - - .. . - - .. .;wry"- - .. - - Slake\ordinanc\483-d -15- 8G-1 6 (sr hcrcin. The sa de ma tal o is afte,41,$recording of the firi lat kds<aawsAs- . � _ � /9/Y,_u�Fxe �f1..�SA? a' m+u.�,b:.x:ax.R 'f+k�. artd r g! + In such case, the subdivider4 furmshf" the City a letter of assurance certifying-that the monumen as required SAT o �t SECTION 23. Paragraph E, Section 8.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "E. Benchmark Monuments on Headwalls: A brass cap approximately 2" in diameter shall be placed on top and at one end of all culvert headwalls within or at the perimeter of the development rtgr tan + f the bd 4sion e (NGVD' 929 " SECTION 24. Article VIII of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding Section 8.04 to read as follows: "$ection)8 04 Digital aTa equ>enq: ' 11° gi t, ! ® €`i€ 11 e € ! ale §CSC " a0 :IV 45 aklt1 @61 ©i g4 s, ,. b /�`I i 1 . • k 1! Y 1 " 4 1 / x� �� ,� a3ii �y r + xl ! be � � kf 1 1 f€ ,o14 (or `i 75! 11(W, 62500 e fix:©re0, g ° SECTION 25. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 26. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 27. It is the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Slake\ordinanc\483-d "lb" 8G—1 7 SECTION 28. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to publish this (re ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 29. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 30. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. L MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: (60, CITY SECRETARY S1ake\ordinanc\483-d -17- 8G-1 8 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: (kr City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: C C Slake\ordinaoc\483-d _18_ 8G-1 9 l ORDINANCE NO. 483-D AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 483, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; REQUIRING INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED ON PLATS; PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN EASEMENTS; PROVIDING AMENDMENTS TO CONFORM TO STATE LAW; AMENDING CURVILINEAR REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING AMENDMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN; ELIMINATING CONFLICTS WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE; REQUIRING MONUMENTS AND INFORMATION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S GIS SYSTEM; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL OTHER ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and L, WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 483, as the Subdivision Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to amend Ordinance No. 483 to conform to other ordinances of the City and to provide more complete information on plats submitted to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. Paragraph B, Section 1.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding and deleting definitions as follows: "EASEMENT. PEDESTRIAN ACC S: A public easement for the purpose of pedestrian ingress, egress and passage to and across private property. The property encumbered by this easement shall be maintained by the owners of the land encumbered by the easement. EASEMENT. MAINTENANCE & ACCESS: An easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining private structures located adjacent to a common lot line. This is a private easement to be maintained by owners of the land encumbered by the easement for the benefit and use of the owner of the adjacent structure, typically used along the"zero lot line" property lines within a subdivision. EASEMENT. EMERGENCY ACCESS: An easement for the purpose of ingress, egress, access, and passage to and across private property for police, fire and other public safety and governmental vehicles and personnel. This is a private easement to be maintained by the owners of the land encumbered by the easement, typically used in conjunction with private streets." 8G-20 SECTION 2. Paragraph A, Section 2.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "A. Any person desirous of combining two or more contiguous previously platted lots into one single lot by removing interior lot lines, shall submit a Plat Revision if easements are to be abandoned by plat or an Amended Plat if easements are to remain as previously platted and obtain approval as outlined in this ordinance and cause the same to be filed of record in the County Plat Records." SECTION 3. Paragraph D, Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "D. The Preliminary Plat shall contain the following information: 1. The case number in the lower left hand corner of the plat. (The case number shall be provided by staff after the first submittal.) 2. North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. 3. Permissible scale: 1"=50', 100', or 200'. (Prefer 1"=100') 4. Location map showing location of tract by references to existing streets or highways. 5. Appropriate title, i.e., "Preliminary Plat", to include subdivision name, City, County, State, Survey and Abstract, total gross acreage, number of lots and date of preparation. 6. Name and address (phone optional) of record owner and subdivider if different. Note volume and page of current deed record ownership. 7. Standard approval block. 8. Name, address and phone of Engineer/Planner/Surveyor. 9. Name of record owner and corresponding deed record volume and page for all adjacent unplatted tracts within 200 feet, to include owners across any adjacent ROW(Amended Ord.No. 483-A) 10. All adjacent platted property within 200' shown in dashed lines, labeling lot and block numbers, subdivision name, street names and plat record reference. 11. Location of City Limit Lines and/or extraterritorial jurisdiction lines. 12. Existing zoning noted on this tract and adjacent tracts. This should be removed on any Final Plats. 13. All existing easements on or adjacent to this tract shown and labeled as to type and size. (11■•• 14. Any adjacent, previously approved and currently valid preliminary plats, concept plans or development plans shown. Slake\ordinanc\483-d -2- 8G-2 1 • 15. The location of existing or approved street intersections on the perimeter of the subdivision or within 200 feet of the perimeter. 16. Legal description of the land to include: Current owner's deed record reference, survey and abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner or previously filed subdivision corner, or USGS monument, gross acreage. 17. Point of beginning labeled on plat. 18. Graphic depiction of all boundary lines shown in heavy lines with deed record dimensions or field surveyed dimensions if available. These should match legal description. 19. Existing ROW shown,labeled and dimensioned,i.e.public streets,highways, alleys,private drives, railroads, etc. 20. Existing traveled roadway widths. 21. General outline of area embraced by tree cover. 22. Permanent structures and uses within the subdivision that will remain. 23. Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the (km., property line. A 10' U.E. should be provided along the ROW of S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, and F.M. 1938. 24. Street ROW dimensioned, all streets having names dissimilar from any existing street names. 25. ROW dedication for existing ROW widening shown and dimensioned. 26. Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order. 27. Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned. (Amended Ord.No. 483-A) 28. Front building setback lines(on all streets)labeled or noted. Fifty-foot(50') front building line required adjacent to State Highway 114,F.M. 1709, and F.M. 1938. (Amended Ord.No. 483-A) 29. Lots to be dedicated for public use labeled as such, i.e. schools, parks, open spaces,etc., showing acreage and general perimeter dimensions. Also show any private uses in same manner. 30. Any proposed zoning labeled as such. (re Slake\ordinanc\483.d -3- 8G-22 31. Schedule addressing phasing of development as shown on the plat, with estimated beginning and completion data for each phase, to include quantitative land use schedule. Typically shown as follows: Land Use Schedule, Phase One LAND USE ZONING #OF #OF GROSS DENSITY NET LOTS UNITS (D.U./ACRE) ACREAGE Single Family Residential SF-lA 40 40 1.0 40.0 Single Family Residential SF-20A 40 40 2.0 20.0 Commercial Center C-3 - - - 5.8 Park AG - - - 15.0 Streets - - - - 25.0 Phase One Subtotals 80 80 1.5 105.8 Phase One expected completion date: July, 1991 32. Graphic depiction of all lots, street ROW, easements, etc., with scaled dimensions. All lots must meet the minimum lot width, depth and area requirements of the zoning district. 33. Approximate flood plain and flood way limits shown. 34. Additional plans required: a. Preliminary Drainage Study: Shall include all requirements as outlined in the Drainage Ordinance of the City including but not limited to the following: 1. Shall be drawn over a mylar or reproducible copy of the Preliminary Plat. 2. Provide the name, address, and phone number of the person preparing the study. 3. Provide the signature and seal of the person preparing the study. 4. Contours in conformance with the following: -Slope less than 2% : 2'vertical intervals -Slope 2%to 15% : 5' vertical intervals -Slope greater than 15% : 10'vertical intervals *Datum should be approved by the City Engineer. Cof 5. Label all existing and proposed drainage structures,i.e.,dams, spillways,flumes,culverts,and note size and type, i.e. earth, concrete,riprap,metal,RCP,VCP, etc. Slake\ordinan6483-d -4- 8G-2 3 6. Flow lines of all drainage and water courses, i.e. streams, (16., creeks, swales, etc. 7. Delineation of on-site and contiguous off-site drainage areas including acreages thereof. This should include a contour map of the entire drainage area contributing runoff to the subdivision. Scale should not be smaller than 1" =2,000'. 8. Sufficient design calculations to determine easement sizes and locations. b. Preliminary Water and Sewer Layout: Shall include: 1. Existing and proposed water lines with sizes shown. 2. Existing and proposed sewer lines with sizes shown. *These may be shown on Preliminary Plat, drainage study, or separately whichever would be more legible. SECTION 4. Paragraph D, Section 3.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "D. The Final Plat shall contain the following information: (Ibie 1. Provide the case number in the lower left hand corner of the plat. The case number shall be provided by staff after the first submittal. 2. North arrow, graphic and written scale in close proximity. 3. Permissible scale: 1"=50', 100'. (Prefer l"=100') Sheet size shall be 24" x 36". (Amended Ord.No. 483-A) 4. Location map showing location of tract by references to existing streets or highways. 5. Appropriate title, i.e., "Final Plat", to include subdivision name, City, County, State, Survey and Abstract,total gross acreage, number of lots, and date of preparation. (Amended Ord. 483-A) 6. Name and address of record owner and subdivider if different. Note volume and page of deed record ownership. 7. Standard approval block. 8. Name, address and phone of Surveyor. 9. Name of record owner and corresponding deed record volume and page for all adjacent unplatted tracts within 200 feet, to include owners across any adjacent ROW(Amended Ord.No. 483-A) (It., 10. All adjacent platted property within 200 feet shown in dashed lines, labeling lot and block numbers, subdivision name, street names and plat record reference. Slake\ordinanc\483-d -5- 8G-24 11. Any adjacent, previously approved and currently valid preliminary plats, concept plans or development plans shown. 12. Location of City Limit Lines and/or extraterritorial jurisdiction lines, all survey lines with survey names labeled. 13. All existing easements on or adjacent to this tract shown and labeled as to type and size with dimensional ties to property corners and centerline or boundary dimensions and bearings. 14. The locations, street names and dimensional centerline references to existing or approved street intersections on the perimeter of the subdivision or within 200 feet of the perimeter. 15. Legal description of the land to include current owner's deed record reference, survey and abstract, county, state, POB tied to survey corner or previously filed subdivision corner, or USGS monument, property corners labeled as to pins/rods, found or set with sizes shown, and gross acreage. 16. Point of beginning labeled on plat. 17. One boundary corner geo-referenced by state plane coordinates in accordance with Section 8.03(B). 18. Graphic depiction of all boundary lines shown in heavy lines with a description that matches legal description. 19. Existing ROW shown,labeled and dimensioned,i.e.public streets,highways, alleys,private drives,railroads, etc. 20. A 50' building setback line provided for S.H. 114, S.H. 26, F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938 unless a greater setback is required by zoning. 21. Net acreage noted on each lot. (sq. ft. if less than one acre) 22. Utility easements: Where adjacent property is unplatted or platted showing a 5' U.E., provide a 5' U.E. along the property line; if adjacent property is platted and shows no easement, provide a 10' U.E. along the interior of the property line. A 10' U.E. should be provided along the ROW of S.H. 114, F.M. 1709, and F.M. 1938. 23. Street ROW and ROW centerline dimensioned with bearings, all streets having street names as approved by preliminary plat or names dissimilar from any existing street names. 24. ROW dedication for existing ROW widening shown and dimensioned, provide dimensions from center of existing ROW at all adjacent property corners. 25. Lots and blocks labeled with numbers in consecutive order. 26. Drainage and utility easements labeled and dimensioned. 8G-25 Slake\ordinanc\483-d -6- 27. Front building setback lines(on all streets) labeled or noted. 28. Lots to be dedicated for public use labeled as such, i.e. schools, parks, open spaces, etc., showing acreage and calculated perimeter dimensions. Also show any private uses in same manner. 29. Calculated dimensions of all lots, street ROW, easements, etc. All curve data should be labeled including delta, radius, length and tangent. All lots must meet the minimum lot width, depth, and area requirements of the zoning district. 30. Flood plain limit shown and labeled. Flood way limit shown and labeled with dimensional ties to all lot corners. 31. Reproducible acknowledgments, owner's dedication, endorsements and surveyor's certifications in accordance with the official forms on file in the City Secretary's office. (see appendix) 32. Avigation easement shown if applicable. (see appendix) 33. Minimum finish floor elevations shown on all lots impacted by drainage easements or intended to be filled. Finish floor note shown on plat. (see appendix) 34. Statement concerning deed restrictions shown. (see appendix, only for amended plats) 35. Flowage e Easement note shown on plat if applicable. (appendix) 36. Sight triangle note shown on plat if applicable.(Section 8.02)(Amended Ord. No. 483-A) 37. Driveway access limitation note provided if applicable. (Section 5.01-H) 38. The following note shall appear on the face of the plat: "Selling a portion of any lot within this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of state law and city ordinance and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits." 39. Additional plans required: a. Complete and corrected preliminary water and sewer layout. This may be combined with the drainage study and should show all intended easements. b. Final Drainage Study: Shall include all requirements as outlined in the Drainage Ordinance of the City including but not limited to the following: 1. Shall be drawn over a mylar or reproducible copy of the Preliminary Plat. 2. Provide the name,address,and phone number of the Engineer preparing the study. Slake\ordinanc\483-d -7- 8G-26 3. Provide the signature and seal of the Engineer preparing the study. 4. Label the location and elevation of the topographic benchmark. Datum should be approved by the City Engineer. 5. Contours in conformance with the following: -Slope less than 2% : 2'vertical intervals -Slope 2%to 15% : 5'vertical intervals -Slope greater than 15% : 10' vertical intervals 6. Label all existing and proposed drainage structures i.e.,dams, spillways, flumes, culverts, storm drain and note size and type, i.e. earth, concrete,riprap,metal, RCP, VCP, etc. 7. Flow lines of all drainage and water courses, i.e. streams, creeks, swales, etc. 8. Delineation of on-site and contiguous off-site drainage areas including acreages thereof. This should include a contour map of the entire drainage area contributing runoff to the subdivision. Scale should not be smaller than 1" =2,000'. 9. Sufficient design calculations showing final easement sizes and locations. (ipe 10. Some drainage areas may require the applicant to generate computer evaluation models (i.e. HEC I, HEC II, etc.) as determined by the City Engineer and Director of Public Works. Should these runs be required, an additional fee sufficient to cover the City's cost of review will be charged the applicant. The fee shall be designated the "Computer Drainage Study Review Fee" as outlined in the current Fee Schedule adopted by City Council. 40. Additional Support Documents required: a. A percolation test for each lot which will not be served by City sewer. b. Completed Developer's Agreement (prior to construction of utility and drainage improvements) c. Certificate of taxes paid from the City Tax Collector d. Certificate of taxes paid from the Tarrant County Tax Collector e. Certificate of taxes paid from the Local School District Tax Collector f. Any proposed or existing deed covenants/restrictions g. Any proposed Homeowner's Agreements and/or Documents." Slake\ordinanc\483-d -8- 8G-27 SECTION 5. Paragraph A, Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "A. General: 1. Easements for utilities, drainage, walkways, access and other comparable purposes shall generally be located along the side or rear or front lot lines and/or drainage flow lines and shall be labeled "Utility Easement", "Drainage Easement", "Pedestrian Access Easement", "Common Access Easement", "Maintenance and Access Easement", "Emergency Access Easement" or other specifically appropriate labeling on the Final Plat." 2. Easements for water and sewer improvements shall be a minimum of ten feet (10') in width and shall be contained in one lot to the limit it does not impact the buildable area unless otherwise recommended by the City Engineer. Easements for electrical utilities shall be a minimum of ten feet (10') in width and may be centered on lot lines unless otherwise recommended by the City Engineer. 3. Easements for drainage,under normal conditions,shall be measured from the centerline of creeks, ditches or drainage channels, and shall be of width sufficient to adequately serve the intended purposes. 4. The City may require, in order to facilitate access from roads to schools, parks, playgrounds, or other nearby roads, perpetual unobstructed access easements for pedestrian or bicycle traffic. 5. Easements dedicated on the plat shall be deemed dedicated to the publ ic and to the City of Southlake unless specified otherwise. 6. Private streets shall be labeled as "Emergency Access &Utility Easements" in order to facilitate access for police, fire and other public safety and governmental vehicles and personnel and franchise utility and solid waste disposal vehicles and personnel." SECTION 6. Subparagraph (B)10, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "10. All preliminary plats shall substantially conform to the Concept Plan or Development Plan approved in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance of the City." SECTION 7. Paragraph F, Section 4.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "F. Developer's Agreements: Unless noted otherwise, no utility, street or drainage improvement construction or any public or private improvements shall be allowed until the developer receives approval of a final plat and, upon approval of a final plat, a developer's agreement has been approved by City Council. Preliminary grading for streets may begin prior to approval of a developer's agreement. This developer's agreement may be waived by the Council upon a showing of good cause. The developer's agreement shall, among other things, address the physical public improvements, i.e. streets, water, sewer, storm drainage, street lights, street signs, and other applicable required services, features or facilities, which are to be Slake\ordinanc\483d -9- 8G-28 installed in the subdivision. Such agreement shall be based on cost estimates thereof, prepared by the subdivider's engineer and reviewed by the City Engineer." SECTION 8. Subparagraph (A)1, Section 4.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "1. A public hearing shall be scheduled and due notification given for the hearing to be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission. City staff will provide notification on the same basis as required for changes of zoning under Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code." SECTION 9. Paragraph B, Section 4.04 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "B. Multiple-Lot Plat Showings: All multiple-lot Plat Showings will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. A public hearing shall be scheduled and due notification given for the hearing to be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission. City staff will provide notification on the same basis as required for changes of zoning under Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code. The Plat Showing accompanied by the plat review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for recommendation and the Council for final action. Upon approval by Council, the Zoning Administrator will obtain the signature of the Commission Chairman and Secretary, and Mayor and City Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance." SECTION 10. Paragraph B, Section 4.05 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "B. Amended Plats with five or more lots: All Amended Plats with five or more lots will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. A public hearing shall be scheduled and due notification given for the hearing to be held by the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion. City staff will provide notification on the same basis as required for changes of zoning under Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code. The Amended Plat accompanied by the plat review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for final action. Upon approval by the Commission, the Zoning Administrator will obtain the signature of the Commission Chairman and Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance." SECTION 11. Section 4.06 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "Section 4.06 Plat Revision. Processing: A. All Plat Revisions (Replats) will be accepted for review, plat review comments generated and a copy of this review given to the applicant. A public hearing shall be scheduled and due notification given for the hearing to be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission. City staff will provide notification as required for replats under Chapter 212 of the Local Government Code. The Plat Revision accompanied by the plat review comments shall then be sent to the Commission for recommendation and then to City Council for final action. Upon approval by the Council, the Zoning Administrator will obtain the signature of the Mayor and City 11 Secretary and file the plat in accordance with this ordinance. 8G-29 Slake\ordinanc\483-d -10- SECTION 12. Paragraph A, Section 5.02 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, (.60, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "A. Street right-of-way shall be as shown in the Thoroughfare Plan and, where not shown therein, shall be not less than the following: STREET TYPE ROW WIDTH State/County varies (100'-500') Arterial - Five lane undivided (MU) 84' Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 90' Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 70' Collector - Two lane undivided (C2U) 60' Local Street (non-residential) 60' Local Street (residential) 50' SECTION 13. Subparagraphs (A)2-4, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, are amended to read as follows: "2. Curvilinear Design Standards: A subdivision shall be in compliance with the above curvilinear design requirements provided that 50% or more of the lots meet one of the following requirements: a. Street Lots: Lots with fifty percent (50%) or more of the lot frontage along a street with a maximum centerline radius of eight hundred feet (800'). b. Cul-de-sac Lots: Lots with fifty percent (50%) or more of the lot frontage along the street centerline from the radius point to a maximum distance of five hundred feet (500'). However, if a cul- de-sac aligns with another, the maximum distance for curvilinear compliance is reduced to two hundred-fifty feet (250') along the street centerline. L 8G-30 Stake\ordinanc\483-d -11- SECTION 14. Subparagraph (F)1, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of (itio, Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "1. Centerline Radius: The following centerline radii shall be the minimum allowed in the design of all street construction: STREET TYPE MINIMUM RADIUS Arterial - Five lane undivided (A5U) 1000' Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 1000' Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 600' Collector - Two lane undivided (C2U) 400' Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer" SECTION 15. Subparagraph (F)2, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "2. Common Tangents: Reverse Circular Curves having a common tangent shall be separated by a tangent section in accordance with the following (hime table: STREET TYPE MINIMUM TANGENT BETWEEN CURVES Arterial - Five lane undivided (MU) 200' Arterial - Four lane divided (A4D) 200' Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 100' Collector - Two lane undivided (C2U) 50' Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer" L 8G-31 slake\ordinanc\483-d -12- SECTION 16. Subparagraph (G)2, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of (to, Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "2. Maximum Grades: No streets shall be designed or constructed with grades in excess of the following: STREET TYPE MAXIMUM GRADE Arterial - Five lane undivided & four lane 6.0% divided (A5U & A4D) Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 8.0% Collector - Two lane undivided (C2U) 10.0% Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer" SECTION 17. Subparagraph (G)3, Section 5.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "3. Vertical Curve Lengths: In order to maintain adequate sight distance, the following minimum lengths of vertical curves shall be required: (ire STREET TYPE MAXIMUM GRADE Arterial - Five lane undivided (A5U) and 50 feet for each algebraic four lane divided (A4D) percent difference in grade Arterial - Four lane undivided (A4U) 50 feet for each algebraic percent difference in grade Collector - Two lane undivided (C2U) 50 feet for each algebraic percent difference in grade Local Street (residential & non-residential) As approved by City Engineer" SECTION 18. Paragraph B, Section 8.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "B. All lots, regardless of zoning or whether or not zoned, that are not served by a public or quasi-public community sewer system, shall contain a minimum lot area as required in the Zoning Ordinance to support a private septic tank and leach field. A subdivision may, at the discretion of the Commission, be deemed to be served by a public sewer system if a Developer Agreement has been executed with the City outlining provisions for extending public sewer service to the development and providing for payment by the development of all required approach main, connection and impact fees necessary to acquire the service." 8G-32 ) Slake\ordinanc\483-d -13- SECTION 19. Paragraphs D, E and F, Section 8.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Co, Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "D. All side lot lines shall be perpendicular to the ROW lines or radial in the case of a cul-de-sac or curvilinear design. E. A row or tier of lots having a minimum lot width of 125 feet at the rear property line shall be provided adjacent to the following: 1. any property that is currently zoned or platted residential and contains lots of one acre or larger 2. any property shown on the approved City Land Use Plan to be designated for lots of one acre or larger in size. F. For the purposes of section 8.01(E), the minimum lot width shall be measured along the lot line common to the adjacent property. If the lot line is comprised of two or more segments, the 125' shall be measured as follows: 1. For deflection angles 30°(degrees) and less, the length of the line segments may be summed to meet the 125' requirement 2. For deflection angles greater than 30°(degrees), the length of the line segments may be summed to meet the 125' requirement; however, the minimum length for each segment shall be 100'." SECTION 20. Paragraph H, Section 8.01 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "H. All corner lots within the municipal city limits shall have setback lines on both streets as required by the Zoning Ordinance." SECTION 21. Section 8.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding Paragraph B to read as follows: "B. Permanent Geo-referenced Survey Monuments: The requirements of this section shall apply only to final plats involving ten or more lots. The subdivider's surveyor shall provide a letter certifying the horizontal positioning of one of the permanent survey monuments described in section 8.03(A) in state plane coordinates prior to the acceptance of the subdivision. The purpose of this requirement is to geo-reference the subdivision by state plane coordinates for the City's GIS system." SECTION 22. Paragraph C, Section 8.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "C. Installation of Monuments: Monuments shall be installed before the recording of the final plat. The subdivider may install monuments after the recording of the final plat and after completion of improvements provided the subdivider furnishes the City a letter of assurance certifying the monuments will be installed as required. All monuments shall be installed prior to acceptance of the subdivision." 8G-33 Slake\onlinan6483-d -14- SECTION 23. Paragraph E, Section 8.03 of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, (6„.., the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "E. Benchmark Monuments on Headwalls: A brass cap approximately 2" in diameter shall be placed on top and at one end of all culvert headwalls within or at the perimeter of the development. Prior to acceptance of the subdivision, the subdivider's surveyor shall provide a letter certifying the elevation of the brass cap (NGVD 1929)." SECTION 24. Article VIII of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding Section 8.04 to read as follows: "Section 8.04 Digital Data Requirements: Prior to acceptance of the subdivision, the subdivider shall provide a digital computer file or files of the subdivision containing the coordinate geometry for the subdivision boundaries, lot lines, ROW, street centerlines and easements in a format and on media compatible with the City GIS system. This requirement shall only apply to final plats of ten or more lots." SECTION 25. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that Cy a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 26. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 27. It is the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 28. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without (we further proof than the production thereof. 8G-34 Slake\ordinanc1483-d -15- SECTION 29. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 30. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR (libe ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L Slake\ordinanc\483-d -16- 8G-35 • APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: L City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L L stake\ordinanc\483-d -17- 8G-36 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tom Elgin, Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 483-E,First Reading,Proposed Amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 Attached is a proposed revision to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-E. This revision provides a process for approval of private street subdivisions, provides a process for conversion of a public street subdivision to private streets, and establishes regulations for private streets. The intent of this revision is as follows: 1. Alert prospective property owners (on property deeds)that routine City services may not be provided or, if provided, may be at reduced service levels; 2. Provide necessary easements for access and utilities; 3. Provide for annual inspection and insure repair of streets if the homeowner association fails to do so; and 4. Establish entrance design standards to minimize congestion on adjoining public streets. On October 19, 1995, the Planning&Zoning Commission approved draft#3 of the proposed revision to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-E with minor amendments by a vote of 7-0. The attached revision in ordinance format incorporates those amendments. Please place this item on the next City Council agenda for their consideration and first reading. att: Proposed revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-E G:I WPFI MEMOI STAFFI CEHI483E CC WPD 8H-1 ORDINANCE NO. 483-E Le AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AMENDING NDING ORDINANCE NO. 483, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; PROVIDING REGULATIONS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PRIVATE STREETS; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL OTHER ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance No. 483, as the Subdivision Ordinance for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interest Lof the City to amend Ordinance No. 483, to authorize authorize the establishment of private streets within the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: SECTION 1. Article V of Ordinance No. 483 of the City of Southlake, the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, is amended by adding a new Section 5.04 to read as follows and renumbering the remaining sections accordingly: "Section 5.04 Private Street Requirements in Residential Subdivisions: A subdivision zoned for residential use may be developed with private streets in place of public streets in compliance with this section. A. Authority for Approval. Private streets may be approved only by the Council after a recommendation by the Commission in accordance with the following procedures: 1. New Developments: A proposal for private streets in a new development must be submitted and shown on a preliminary plat of the proposed addition. 2. Existing Subdivisions: Public streets may be changed to private streets within existing subdivisions in accordance with section 5.04(E)2. B. Conditions of Approval. A request for a subdivision with private streets may be denied if, after receiving a recommendation from the Commission, the Council determines that private streets would: 8H-2 1. negatively affect traffic circulation on public streets; (kor 2. impair access to or from properties of future developments eithe r er on-site or off-site to the subdivision; 3. impair access to or from public facilities including schools or parks; 4. delay the response time of emergency vehicles; 5. replace streets shown on the adopted Thoroughfare Plan; 6. impede or cross an existing or proposed street as shown on the City's most recent Thoroughfare Plan or any approved Preliminary of Final Plats; or 7. disrupt an existing or proposed City public pedestrian pathway, hike and bike trail, equestrian trail, or park as shown on the City's most recent Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan or Trail System Master Plan. C. Requirements 1. Homeowner's Association Required: A subdivision developed with private streets shall have a mandatory homeowner's association which includes all properties served by the private streets. The association shall own and be responsible for the maintenance of the private streets and appurtenances after transfer of ownership from the developer to the homeowner's association or after two years elapsed time since the final inspection by the City, whichever occurs first. The association's document shall indicate that the streets within the development are private, owned and maintained by the association, and that the City has no obligation to maintain the private streets. The documents shall be filed of record prior to the filing of record of the Final Plat with the County. Lot deeds shall convey membership in the association and provide for the payment of dues and assessments required by the association. The association shall not be dissolved without the prior written consent of the City. The portion of the association's documents pertaining to the maintenance of the private streets and assessments shall conform to the requirements of this section and shall not be amended without the prior written consent of the City. 2. Waiver of Services: The subdivision Final Plat, property deeds and homeowner's association's documents shall note that certain City services will not be provided on private streets. Among the services which may not be provided are: routine police patrols, enforcement of traffic and parking ordinances and preparation of accident reports. Depending on the characteristics of the proposed development other services may not be provided. 3. Hold Harmless: The subdivision Final Plat and the homeowner's association's documents shall contain language whereby the homeowner's (kr- association, as owner of the private streets and appurtenances, agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, any governmental entity and public utility for damages to the private street occasioned by the reasonable use of the private street by the City, governmental entity or slake\ordinanc1483-E -2- 8H-3 public utility; for damages and injury (including death) arising from the .(16, condition of said private street; for damages and injury (including death) arising out of the use by the City, governmental entity or public utility of any restricted access gate or entrance; and for damages and injury (including death) arising out of any use of the subdivision by the City, government entity or public utility. Further, such language shall provide that all lot owners shall release the City, governmental entities and public utilities for such damages and injuries. The indemnifications contained in this paragraph apply regardless of whether or not such damages and injury (including death) are caused by the negligent act or omission of the City, governmental entity or public utility, or their representative officers, employees or agents. Those portions of the homeowner's association's document pertaining to the subject matter contained in this paragraph shall not be amended without the prior written consent of the City. 4. City Attorney Review: All homeowner's association's documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney to ensure that they conform to the requirements of this section of the ordinance and other applicable City ordinances prior to being filed of record at the County. D. Private Street Standards 1. Construction and Maintenance Cost: The City shall have no responsibility for and shall not pay for any portion of the cost of constructing or maintaining a private street. 2. Construction Standards: Private streets shall conform to the same standards regulating the design and construction of public streets. These standards shall include, but are not limited to the street standards, engineering design guidelines and construction standards and details, street naming, and addressing policy. 3. Private Street Lot: Private streets shall be constructed within a separate platted lot owned by the homeowner's association. This lot shall conform to the City's standards for public street right-of-way. A utility, drainage and emergency access easement covering the street lot shall be granted to the City providing unrestricted use of the property for utilities and their maintenance. This easement shall extend to all utility providers including telecable companies operating within the City. The easement shall also provide the City with the right of access for any purpose related to the exercise of a governmental service or function, including but not limited to fire and police protection, inspection and code enforcement. The easement shall permit the City to remove any vehicle or obstacle within the private street lot that impairs emergency access. 4. City Utilities: Water, sewer and drainage facilities and street lights placed within the private street shall be installed to City standards and dedicated to the City. All City regulations relating to infrastructure financing, developer cost participation and capital cost recovery, except those related to street construction, shall apply to developments with private streets. slake\ordinanc\483-E -3- 811-4 5 Plans, Inspections, and Maintenance: Developments proposed with private streets shall submit to the City the same plans and engineering information required to construct public streets, utilities, and related appurtenances. Requirements pertaining to inspection and approval of improvements prior to the City's acceptance of the development shall apply. Fees charged for these services shall also apply. The City Engineer may conduct an annual inspection of the private streets and related appurtenances, and require repairs necessary to insure emergency access. The City shall be the sole judge of whether repairs are needed. In the event the homeowner's association, its successors or assigns, shall fail or refuse to adequately maintain the private streets and related appurtenances, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to assume temporarily the duty of performing the association's maintenance obligations at any time after the expiration of sixty (60) days after receipt by the association, its successors or assigns of prior written notice specifying the nature and extent of the failure to maintain. Upon assuming such maintenance obligations, the City shall have the right to collect, when the same become due, the assessments levied by the homeowner's association for the purposes of repairing and maintaining private streets and related appurtenances; and if necessary, the City shall have the right to enforce the payment of delinquent assessments in the manner set forth in the association's documents. In the alternative, the City shall also have the right to levy an assessment upon each lot on a pro rata basis for the cost of such maintenance, which assessment shall constitute an assessment lien upon the lot against which each assessment is (me made. In no case and under no circumstances, shall the City be liable to the association or any lot owner or their respective heirs, successors or assigns for negligent acts or omissions relating in any manner to maintaining, improving and preserving the private streets and related appurtenances. The association's documents shall contain provisions in conformity with this paragraph which shall not be amended without the prior written consent of the City. 6. Access Restrictions: The entrances to all private streets shall be marked with a sign stating that it is a private street. Guard houses, access control gates and cross arms may be constructed. All restricted access entrances shall be manned 24 hours every day, or an alternative means shall be provided of ensuring access to the subdivision by the City and other utility service providers with appropriate identification. If the association fails to maintain reliable access as required to provide city services, the City shall have the right to enter the subdivision and remove any gate or device which is a barrier to access at the sole expense of the association. The association's documents shall contain provisions in conformity with this paragraph which shall not be amended without the prior written consent of the City. 7. Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards: Any private street which has an access control gate or cross arm shall have a minimum uninterrupted pavement width of 24 feet at the location of the access control device. If an overhead barrier is used, it shall have minimum height above the road surface as required by the Fire Code for fire lanes. The design of all gates, cross arms and access control devices, including automatic opening systems and manual backup systems, shall be approved by the Fire Department slake\ordinanc\483-E -4- 8H-5 prior to installation. The gates, cross arms and opening devices shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to being put into operation. Gate designs may incorporate one or two gate sections to meet the required minimum width of 24 feet. If the entrance is to incorporate a median, guard shack, or similar structure that necessitates a divided gate arrangement, the gate and street pavement widths may be reduced if approved by the Fire Department. This approval shall be contingent upon the development with private streets having a second approved means of access, but in no case shall any single gate or street pavement have a clear opening of less than 15 feet. 8. Visitor Entrance Design Standards: At least one entrance per subdivision with private streets shall be equipped for visitor access. In addition to the above Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards, the visitor entrance shall be equipped with a call or code box located at least 50 feet from the boundary of the subdivision to provide for visitors calling in and automobile queuing. A turn-around space with a minimum outside radius of 30 feet shall be located between any call or code box and access control gate or cross arm to allow vehicles denied access to safely exit onto public streets in a "head out" position. A sign shall be erected next to the edge of such turn around space to prohibit vehicle parking in such space. Residents entrance used in combination with a visitor entrance shall comply with the requirements of this paragraph. 9. Resident Only Entrance Design Standards: In addition to the above Restricted Access Entrance Design Standards, access control gate or cross arm that requires residents to use a key, card or code to gain access shall setback internally a minimum of 50 feet from the boundary of the subdivision to provide for automobile queuing. Resident entrances equipped with an electronic opener that allows residents to remotely open the control access gate or cross arm and enter the subdivision without having to stop are exempted from this requirement. A sign shall be erected next to any resident entrance that does not meet the 50 feet setback requirement of this paragraph and does not provide a turn-around space with a minimum outside radius of 30 feet to indicate that it is for resident use only and not for visitors. E. Conversion of Streets 1. Petition to Convert to Public Streets: The homeowner's association's documents shall allow the association to request the City to accept private streets and alleys and the associated property as public streets and right-of- way upon prior written notice to all association members and the favorable vote of the membership. However, in no event shall the City be obligated to accept said streets and alleys as public. Should the City elect to accept the streets and alleys as public, the City shall have the right to inspect the private streets and levy an assessment upon each lot on a pro rata basis for the expense of needed repairs which assessment shall constitute an assessment lien upon the lot against which each assessment is made. The City shall be the sole judge of whether repairs are needed. The City shall also have the right to require, at the association's expense, the removal of guard houses, access control devices, landscaping or other aesthetic amenities located within the street lot. The homeowner's association's slake\ordinanc\483-E -5- 8H-6 document shall provide for the City's right to require said assessment and (hpe removal of improvements. Those portions of the homeowner's association's documents pertaining to the subject matter contained in this paragraph shall not be amended without the prior written consent of the City. 2. Petition to Convert to Private Streets: An existing, platted subdivision may petition the City to become a subdivision with private streets subject to all of the above criteria, plus the following additional criteria: a. The petition shall contain the signatures of the owners of 100% of the existing lots in the subdivision requesting approval as a private street subdivision; b. The conversion to private streets requires a public hearing and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission and public hearing and approval by the City Council. c. Upon the approval by the City Council, petitioners or applicants shall agree to contract with the City for purchase of the installed infrastructure and rights-of-way from the City of Southlake at a value to be determined by the City Council for cash in full payment, and to maintain the infrastructure at city standards thereafter." SECTION 2. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or C., refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. It is the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same C., would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. slake\ordinanc1483-E _6_ 8H-7 SECTION 5. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is directed to publish the (ow, proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice settingout the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 6. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L slake\ordinanc\483-E -7- 8H-8 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L L slake\ordinanc\483-E -8- 8H-9 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Ordinance 652 - First Reading, Abandonment of Ingress and Egress Road Easement on the MTP-IBM Property Attached are Ordinance No. 652 and a Quitclaim Deed for the abandonment of an ingress and egress road easement granted by Harry and Carolyn Boyer. MTP-IBM has purchased approximately 326 acres of land that encompasses this road easement. The intent of MTP-IBM is to develop two unit developments: one commercial and the other residential (see attached Concept Plan). The City of Southlake has determined that this ingress and egress road easement is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. Because MTP-IBM is replatting this land, it would be more beneficial for the City to abandon this easement and Quitclaim Deed the property over to the surrounding property owner. Because this is an ingress and egress road easement, City Attorney advised staff to abandon this easement by ordinance. Ordinance 652 empowers the Mayor to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the ingress and egress road easement on the behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. Please place this on the November 7, 1995 City Council agenda for first reading. BW/sm Attachments: Ordinance 652 Quitclaim Deed Survey showing easement Concept Plan (11W" wpdocs\wthead.mem\agenda\boyer.wpd Lie ORDNANCE NO. 652 ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING AN INGRESS AND EGRESS ROAD EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS; DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, INTEREST AND CONTROL OF THIS INGRESS AND EGRESS ROAD EASEMENT; eis PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City of Southlake is a home city acting under its c' er adopted by the electorate p -. • Article XI, Section of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that this ingress and egress road easement in the City of Southlake, is not being used by,nor useful or convenient to the public in general;therefore, it constitues a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefitted by its vacation and abandonment; and WHEREAS, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said ingress and egress road easement,the City desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said ingress and egress road easement to the owners of the abutting property. 1 g1� --2- NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: SECTION 1 The following ingress and egress road easement is hereby vacated and abandoned as a: dedicated ingress and egress road easement, more specifically described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B. Further,the franchise utility companies have expressed no objection to the abandonment of said ingress and egress road easement as recounted in Exhibit C. Exhibits A,B and C are attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. The ingress and egress road easement is not being used by,nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit,and the public would be better served and benefitted byits vacation and abandonment. The ingress and egress road easement so vacated �' gr' and abandoned shall revert in fee simple to the owners of the abutting property. SECTION 2 The Mayor of the City of Southlake,Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title,ownership, or control of the ingress and egress road easement on the behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. SECTION 3 A copy of said quitclaim deed shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas by the office of the City Secretary. SECTION 4 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, 2 • (iv, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. 3 L MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney L L 4 8�'S (kir, QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and for other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,the City of Southlake (Grantor),does hereby bargain,sell,release,vacate,abandon and forever quit claim unto: MTP-IBM and any and all of their heirs, legal representatives or assigns,all of Grantor's right,title,and interest in and to the property described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. (re TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the above described property unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs,legal representatives or assign shall have,claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid property premises or appurtenances or any part thereof. EXECUTED this the day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes,Mayor (16., 1 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 1995,by Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My commission expires: Type or Print Notary's Name Grantee Address: Return to: City Secretary City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake,Texas 76092 forms\quitclaim.frm 2 e1-7 EXHIBIT A METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION Being a proposed 40.0 foot road easement out of the R.D. Price Survey, A-1207, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point 1047.8 feet North and 222.5 feet East of the Southwest corner of the R.D. Price Survey; THENCE East 846.8 feet to a point in the West R.O.W. line of County Road #3016; THENCE North along the West R.O.W. line of said road 40.0 feet to a point; -"THENCE West 816.6 feet to a point; THENCE South 40.0 feet to the place of beginning. Being that same Road Easement granted by Harry Boyer and wife, Carolyn A. Boyer, dated October 26, 1964, filed October 29, 1964, and recorded in Volume 3991, Page 591, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. L 33517.1/SP3/JKF/1852/080995 O r b + EXHIBIT B • IW.. W. MILLS SURVEY A - 477 I -.>'` W. MILLS SURVEY A - 1043 Ili ':i4wl . .. % W. MEDLIN SURVEY A-tl ..�. ... W. +Sr .'..,-fit. V '� 11.'t -__ ______ ` •�+ t a K� 'may "" "....-•. ' - �, O. DOUTNIT SURVEY fir, a�f ': ;� - t, t A - 143 ...... D J • =t 1 064 O ' O a�•I.a • ,V" i ! M�.uo.i r—•aa•— 1 r Q IC lull R R1f 1r Q M • •- aw. ...a. •• ayr c a Y .I� I ilifir ►Y•� :RI a. .r) V _= .a I`N � • �• ' J; • Y< .4 _ •{ II r•: I.-t c 1 / .:, 16 ..i :.- .. rR , + •.� f: ' _ ,l * Wilk 's; •, "'7 I .♦. V R. D. PRICE SURVEY �.�rara�n0.�^..-errs �/�'-"-...ou`�w... A - 1207 +o, \... • �• �iV, .,� '.. \; P.aa �. a..�;.... TIM 4:-....r. \-1.1.- I: \ , T.W.MANN SURVEY I. 3 I A-1107 a_: Pt .(11 . ••• ! • s . ..,...... --...,. :i pi. a. >� lc-' - 1 1 3 4 s k.SyM{gNiY�a • src NI/ .ales MOSS ; _ IL Sell .CKS IN NW NIOIt)-C-Yt �+��N ; 3 I acrars `• a(y .... ... = -i � � trs w KRIS NCI _. `'M r... ... •cr' -- s,r.= ^rs Yd�vletaa�aesc �..-- Rttir>iLan=swam— Pi'��gfrY.eI� I fix-- 'bar Arfrosimat IoCri/ ';'WA +fill{fieral2R'il:.. ll •.a.taa:r:wve•arsr { •� - r vAyasaararaasaaeesr : .... 1 • p�..—.w�—...--. ..afararJrrauwa •-• !, IA a .r 1 `•6 ,It11.fi• • �.....-.. ........ RL. ar&rJaw ..wiMaw `r1 r 1gitx.rlfiifsN:rwv—• M+a " �� 1J•'W.. Wan CRIALVITAIne farFti r„.xslaymans... lE{A fill .art ' 2 ` .� 4='=' FtSl2drrisiririatrs aa7i[ � •-r I• wistirssrantarrawa. milIr��.• y y . /- Iiataf- rl�t >6t tic . ••••.•......�- mows tc:taesirarvrraaa isi ssiiLL7IR•iis _aetRI ••• Wri 1Hitf►'Ra.ITI ..PPP..•.r.a•..w..ww.-.PM PPM.a PROP �.�::•�N.� Ij � ,�IRr Iran v.i w.. .M VP al Ya•MP Mti..r� trJLi►n&TaI`— _• MI'f� 1.....1 K 1' i K/.Rifles• imagamenikf�a• _ mo..(.•. . (..„ 1 •wtaevraawsaa_ tti• .44•c •1rs.r. 8-�9 • IA SOUNDAET SURVEY Or ®©© t iX�fi7 ACRES OF LAND m0.'—�— _ ram... - a. M 4 r I1:3M© - I�••,--.-- - (Pr Exhibit C UTILITY COMPANY APPROVALS We, the undersigned. as duly authorized representatives of the respective utility companies, hereby express no objection to the abandonment * as described on the attached exhibits. Texas Utilities Electric Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. Signed: 7r2 1, . 71 o-o Signed: Printed Name: Gordon Hood Printed Name: Sip ci3-ei R ,e?- Title: Right of Way Manager Title: t 11'F t'.eirff Fitt- Due: September 14, 1995 Date: /o-9- 9 5 Sout .s r Bell 7hone ,one Star Gas Ccoa3 y t Signed. .Mr��/r�P_ Si �� Printed Name: o . Jones Printed NName.=_'Y'414Jfl /JZ . .h' Tide: Manager Engineering-R.O.W. Tide: 7 1 a c ( C .N A-4 Date: /0 1— 9� Date: Tf.5�7S • Harrow � ,Aith Signed: k of T Sammons C� . Mg, / I D1 Printed Name: n P Printed Name: Sandra ' . Turle/ rdoroon Tide: Construction Manager Title: Vice President-RPginna1 gyrations Date: 4/ s/q Due: Set tember 14. 1995 * of a public ingress and egress easement, being' a proposed 40.0 foot road easement out of the R.D. Price Survey, A-1207, Tarrant County, Texas and being that same road easement granted by Harry Boyer and wife, Carolyn A. Boyer, dated October 26, 1964, filed October 29, 1964, and recorded in Volume 3991, Page 591, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas f _ -_. } ww ArkM w.rr I .w M si•D • •+�+n.+..wr yr— $.7MMIl. •SplM•0M 7277 sr.•.0 NW •wry •�••6•100.fN I N3L1V0 (111.100e 0 Z 0 �� - C°7 _ � W� iLA_ VW MOLC D MR• C 0 U • he N �F• „. i N Q Q H 1 • s ads f-< = I Xi JJ��iT�• N Wax deo- <1. I--W N .90'SLZ W • U Cr/ a N X —CO W J eo st? ii / : i11$1JJrJ1 'i • :0 $ i 1 1114 ; I /I .1 ki Li "••• •- 1 .12-fi eC0.4—:al f pfl { ! ! ! ifiek1 2, • IS .;alp; ii cc . ..› a ill I :I ; g Plihrlikill . °dam"' o Q m ...0. is as • . +tr.a • ua I I =<J J • 1 z n> d I �r :. ....... !"-ii Q of .t}•r P� • i) t I ....,... ...il :;al >i_• a W. : hill t .I •, m ( ( I I !Mt 4aa .4601: le 4 @ "ill • 1 n 01 �• 1 il�:y !us a.4. 'aij $ ';1 i. If rY�EM � >r � s i cc e• •f co N it .g^.! Ti Tl . ! ! a. 2 W ....-1 M �. Y A. !till e m • I 41 ;if 4:pi r .itS .l a ► • / !j4; 41kr j k4Ii :t: if c •^ • ryyd� �a. l� �fl�i li I. I t`ISI 1...\ S r a NNtlbbaY � a 6 1 90'StL ! ' i 1 �.. 1 I IA•PZ.SC AON� 41 . L a:N~ ~ ioem - w • 1 v Cl g-,,i U, . w. 2 I- - A M:10119 NOL 70nJ '0 .P 1 o a L CONCEPT PLAN P.U.D. NO. SOLANA 480-________ P.U.D. NO. -- KIRKWOOD 480- ____ SOUTHLAKE. TEXAS • - _ _ �" 1_ - {ram_ AMR(iXMA1[SOILI.n lM $.! g 41 71,,,,,.: el ttt )•,s, `, J 1 Mom.i •. W. RESIDENTIAL '. gyp. j i. g ('� R..c.000 Iuo ..,,I:...,..iis.r..a..,...r,::.*_-"-_...-:-_,,.,..,_,,.„-,„.o0,,.2.11_02,L- :,.-- t. :'...:,...:s.‘4. I . As1j.%411 1 `•max. u } ��.�� j •'r•-- / `�' ' • • •S. `.S��!. rs ` • ''-•/ /.\ , KfieOil�w 1+fw HIJ.e J \ t. ../ .. '11Tl' TJ\ •\ //• •`--{` 1 L. ,' 904 M 09 . I.7 K l \,'' \ Ot j. \•=k i-- SF RESIDENTIAL; r"�ti':` -\ :•s r �\ \ :� 1, : %te. tad!' — +` ��._ L • COMMERCIAL `\ s i �:\ \ c�\' a k Woh �„�\ -• LEWD •\ \, .. t \a ,'R a4 A :" \\ + Woos nAm Orr \ \ •tr• I `4 1 SF. RESIDENTIAL OPEN sna / \'\. \' BUD. SH0.0lANA iI' \Th 1.• Trti O\. \. • 40- '�1' 1 _".�'. ;'. '. • • %IA \ s\\`r ���� �� \ \mil � •�'� f �' aaAw ND \ \ \• i'3 1 •, X\ i I _ D C. mu4.aa MIA • .a...a p� \ COMMERCIAL\ \ \ • / IX f \ \ 'k_—' ' • I ENTIAL ` ,1 \ i`�e� r ��i y . Ii ••KID IIIh•r MSC I DM•ANT SDIW .�; \ •� •s 1"j)�+' __ - I�.. �•`r M(VILLAGE Q1C{t \ , •I UMW;11:011 7WIs MR 100 •\ •\ `.\ '• •es ! �) s, r NA•1AK now PA•IKM .i : .�.r —C I•� • sis somas max .• , DK 3r--G ICU•114I2 • \- .• •• .. t 4' liT ti ISu NARKS,I•L•we CIO• ~7�l0 ♦ •. Lw �c MA•1.oV ' uUI ID 1A1M11 NAM MO _ WSW.MAD al 4-• TUN FIGURE 7 Din New City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Appointment to the Park and Recreation Board Resolution No. 95-42, allows for the appointment for a member to the Park and Recreation Board, to fill the unexpired term of Frank Dorer who resigned. His term was to expire in May, 1997. After advertising for this opening in the Grapevine Sun, Southlake Journal, Colleyville and Times, only two (2) applications have been received, from: Robert Bledsoe and Sherry Berman. If you should have questions, please do not hesitate to cetftact me. lslqa, — / L City of Southlake,Texas (iire RESOLUTION NO. 95-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE SOUTHLAKE PARK AND RECREATION BOARD, TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Parks and Recreation Board was created for the purpose of Planning and Developing Parks and Park sites within the City of Southlake, for the use and benefit of its citizens; and, WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Board shall consist of nine (9) members, to serve three (3) year staggered terms; and, WHEREAS, currently there is a vacancy of an unexpired term, left by Frank Dorer; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into ce, the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The following is hereby appointed to fill unexpired term of Frank Dorer which will expire in May, 1997. Section 3. The appointment is to be effective on the day of approval by the City Council of the City of Southlake. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BY: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary qa. • City of Southlake,Texas l(...., APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO REC ./ /: ' ) SOUTHLAKE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS SEP 1 : 1995 CITY SECRETAR APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (Name of Board, Commission, or Committee) i Perks use a separate application for each appointment desired f NAME: R)19ert e- E Ie1 SDI J c ADDRESS: 1 60) _SLV1 S tw ' HOME PHONE: I 0 I 257S 7 YEARS INe CITY: 2_ _ EMPLOYER: c if'- P'l 1 C Sty MPt"k,-T 1- (3 /OC PHONE: <-(67r 6 "i?t, 3 Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: 1\16nF' Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or Cie committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: 1^ cam" Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: See_ all-,�cned Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? V P S Additional information or comments? \A011Q- Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. Signature: U\(1:-- g Date: 9- 21 --CIS If additional space is needed, attach to this application Robert C. BCecfsoe, Yr., MD. cre Baylor Medical Plaza 1600 W.College,Suite 380. Grapevine,Texas 76051 Metro(817)481-0868 19 September 1995 City of Southlake To Whom It May Concern: I have lived in Southlake for two years now and plan to make this my permanent home. I have also recently married and plan to have children in the near future and raise them in this area. I moved to Southlake because of its pastoral atmosphere and proximity to the hospitals in which I work. With the recent explosion in growth and development in our area, I am concerned and very interested in preserving our community in its pristine state, while at the same time encouraging its growth and development. This growth must not be accomplished at the expense of our beautiful forested landscape. For example, credits to developers must be examined very carefully. These credits should be granted only if they serve the (60," best interest of the community as a whole, not merely the development in question. Our focus must shift from soliciting development in our community to controlling its activity in a manner consistent with our community's vision for its future. Last year I served as Chief of Medical Staff here at Baylor Hospital. I have also served for the past three years as Medical Liaison Officer to the Board of Trustees at Baylor. I am currently Chairman of the Credentials Committee. I am also an avid bicyclist and runner who regularly utilizes the parks system in our community. As such, I am very interested in becoming involved in the Hike and Bike Trail Project. In short, I feel that I am qualified and committed to serve on the Parks and Recreation Board in order to develop and protect the natural resources in our community in a manner responsive to the goals of its citizens. Sincerely, C. dad)0 Robert C. Bledsoe, J , M.D. RCB/jb L let —11- • Cosmetic Surgery • Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • Surgery of the Hand • • Microvascular Surgery • City of Southlake,Texas `. A . ncr 2 4 1995 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY SECRETAR SOUTHLAKE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO: (Name of Board, Commission, or Committee) 1}I'VIC.S Arkd RcC ree-flo, P-Ze use a separate application for each appointment desired NAME: Nh elfZ,L 1 v rn o Ii) ADDRESS: 9112 HOME PHONE: Ct f7(" YEARS IN.CITY: We_PLAl-c EMPLOYER: ��z,(t� A -hwmr. morn PHONE: • Current and/or previous board, commission, or committee experience in the City of Southlake: ,UnnE , a k,i0s4- mooed h iZZ Q ft eYs aq( _ Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission, or Le committee, and your opinion as to the purpose, goals, and duties of same: _ )1 Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving in this position: �� {t C, CL Hr,,:c J Do you understand and agree that your regular attendance and active support are required as an appointee and that noncompliance could result in removal from the board? Lie S Additional information or comments? ae_ u)lLcd- Please return this completed form to the City Secretary's Office. Each application will be kept on file for one (1) year. Signature: //' l C t✓Date: 10P If additiona space is needed, attach to this application L L Reasons for desiring to serve on this board, commission,or committee,and your opinion as to the purpose,goals, and duties of same: The purpose of me wanting to be on this committee is to get involved. I had applied to the leadership program sponsored by the Chamber,unfortunately,there were not enough people,so the program was canceled until next year.I am not working outside the home and have the time to give back to the community,I am always looking for ways to better the community.Before I learned of this position, I had contacted the President of the YMCA to try to get a Y established in this community. I believe the purpose is to offer programs for children and adults to attend.The goals would be to figure out which programs we viable to the community and work on expanding them,the duties would be to educate yourself on what interest the community has,finding a way to support the needs of the community in the realm of the budget given and implementing these programs and educating the community on what is being offered so that these programs are being 100%occupied. Qualifications and experience that would assist you in serving this position. For seven years I ran a wholesale apparel business,I learned to be accountable to budgets and to people,I possess the skill of being a team player and building the team to work on certain goals. I know how to set and achieve personal goals.I have included the questionnaire that Leadership Southlake sent out. This will tell you what I have been doing the past ten years. '1614 L EDUCATION Live goal edacatio ted eadertoaad, ca neverae clvtoaologccal Dacha, ii dadiag de1tee4 auaanded. Meld 044 friaaiaaro ral 44 ictca, rirat ta.,frrogaa.Ka, ete. University of Arkansas--Fayetteville, AR Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration 1981 Marketing Major, Fashion Merchandising Minor Member of American Fashion Association Bureau of Wholesale Representatives EMPLOYMENT AND EXPERIENCE: Steeiteit atatc foot occamtio#etl curd uocatioual 4degnoaud, atcftlieadle, l rc adiag di9wi act accomoliala roe da. 'e$c aKtk goaac freaeat fioaitioa. 1986 -1992 BERMAN AND COMPANY 1982- 1996 KIRKLAND LIMITED. 1981- 1982 KAAY RADIO I am currently staying at home to raise my children, before that I owned a business in wholesale apparel. The business Berman and Company was started in 1986, during 1986 - 1992 I nurtured the growth of undeveloped product lines throughout a 5-state territory that ultimately had a customer base incorporating 1000+accounts. Represented 8 major lines that totaled $4.5 million in annual sales. Berman& Company was consistently ranked by manufacturers as their#1 in sales nation-wide. As owner/manager hired, trained, and developed up to 11 sales reps. Oversaw all operations. In May of 1992 we moved to Marietta and I closed my business in August 1992 due to my husband's relocation. PAGE 1 ga,-7 ORGANIZATIONS AND ACTIVITIES: Zia ea meet 4 6ittioirtacce t!e"a fog co*megltey. Guatwaa curd frico jed4ioiral aca!u.Itied i s ailick lave f aitu aced %atm.te tle macaw oe ran eaodoeaceat, o jjice leld, acco eld al ne rtd. aaavtdd cued aeeoq utlo c 1992-1995 TWIGS MEMBER--EGLESTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL Twigs meet in neighborhood homes across metro Atlanta and communities throughout Georgia with a network of over 1400 members. Twigs have a lot of fun and are a vital fund-raising and service arm of the Egleston Auxiliary. Twigs have contributed over$2 million to purchase life saving equipment and to provide much needed service. In addition, these dedicated members have given countless hours to make the hospital feel like home for the patients and their families. Attended all Twigs meetings. 1993-1994 CO-CHAIRED MERCHANT WALK TWIGS Merchant Walk Twigs is our local neighborhood group with our membership being around 30 women. My responsibilities were to get the women excited and involved in selling "Promise Them Hope" holiday cards and Poinsettias for the Plant Sale. Merchant's Walk Twigs sold more than any other group this year in poinsettias. We also participated in the Festival of Trees craft shop project where we painted clay pots with a design. Our spring fund raising activities included Spring Bedding plant sale, and a fashion show. At the annual spring luncheon, Merchant's Walk Twigs received the"Project Award" for participating in the most projects offered by Twigs. Attended all local and city Twigs meetings. 1993-1994 TREASURER FOR SUBDIVISION Managed income and disbursements for Brittany Lane Subdivision account. Reconciled all bank statements and prepared annual budget. Collected all dues, during this time period, I was able to collect money from all homes except for one. Usually there are several families that do not pay their dues as it is not mandatory. Assisted President in interviewing and hiring a landscape company for upkeep and maintenance of subdivision and entrance of Brittany Lane. 1993-1994 CAPTAIN OF ATLANTA LAWN AND TENNIS ASSOCIATION NEIGHBORHOOD TEAM Coordinated all players to play each position, typed up rooster with food schedule and names, addresses, phone numbers for each team member. Made sure everyone has an Alta. Number and paid their dues. Won our division and district this year. PAGE 2 1994-1995 CHAIRMAN OF TREASURE TRAIN- ELGESTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL The Treasure Train is a cart decorated as a train that holds toys. The volunteers push the train to each of the children's rooms to give them a toy while they are in the hospital. As chairperson, my responsibilities included working with the 1600 person membership to ensure adequate coverage and manage the schedule through out the calendar year. I was also responsible for maintaining adequate stock. I was able to eliminate the budget for toys by getting various corporations to donate the items. We received donations from McDonalds, Wendy's and RTM. Several magazine companies also donated such as Highlights, Sports Illustrated for kids and Teen magazine. A letter was sent to each of the Twigs groups about having a Twigs Treasure Train Shower,(similar to a baby shower) and through this we were able to receive a variety of toys for various age groups. We received over 1500 units in toys to stock the treasure train and had a calendar full of volunteers to push it for the 1994-95 year. 1994-1995 SECRETARY OF MERCHANTS WALK TWIGS GROUP (or This job was mainly computer oriented, as I would type the upcoming events and past events for the monthly meetings. My duties were working with the chairperson to write up all events in that we participated. There was correspondence with the Twigs association at the hospital to let them know what we were doing to raise money this year. If any special notices would come, I would let each of the members know about it. I organized a phone committee, to let each of the members know when our meetings were, so that the responsibility was not on one person. Attended all meetings for local and city Twigs. 1994-95 TWIGS FASHION SHOW COORDINATOR Our main fund raising event for the year was a fashion show, attendance was declining, so I felt it was time to update the event. A change in the location and the use of a prominent local retailer greatly improved interest and attendance. We raised over $1200 for the hospital. As coordinator, I organized members in going out to get donations then, I was able to secure over$400 in donations and giveaways from local merchants that also attributed to the success of the event. Tickets were sold by members of our Twigs group and I was able to bring in 15% of the audience to the fashion show. I also coordinated the advertising effort that included flyers that we distributed to local retailers and provided posters for distribution through out the community. I was in charge of producing the program for the event that included information on merchandise and donations from the retailers along with information regarding Twigs and Egleston Children's Hospital. PAGE 3 1992-1995 MISCELLANEOUS DUTIES In our neighborhood, I felt there was a problem area as the main road that leads to our subdivision is very busy with traffic. We do not have a sidewalk on it and there are lots of runners, walkers and kids crossing the street to go to the pool. I organized a petition committee to get signatures for getting a sidewalk installed. We canvassed the four subdivisions with over 1000 homes and gathered nearly 700 signatures. I have been working with the Department of Transportation and it looks as a sidewalk will be put in sometime in 1996. During 1993, the five acres next to our subdivision was sold. Due to the layout of this land the developer would have to use our entrance way to get in to his subdivision. Along with another neighbor, we led our subdivision in negotiating with this developer to get the land rezoned to a C 15 and to come out with his own entrance without disturbing ours along with a 20 foot buffer. I am very active in national and local politics, and letters are written weekly with senators and representatives in Washington on issues pertaining to taxes, government spending and L the environment. Occasionally I will talk or write to my local legislator on issues pertaining to the area in which we live. • PAGE 4 9a1-'io 1e44e edeaajv a ftantud 44&due. oefi.ctiucc4 oz Ai: die a you geed to arttteal to the Souddlalre anew. Not being a current resident of Southlake I am not sure what issues that are being discussed, but being a Dallas native and watching Dallas and Ft. Worth extend their suburbs, I would say that controlling the growth is one of the biggest obstacles that Southlake will face in the next ten years. Southlake's growth also brings a lot of opportunity, and it seems that there is a lot of involvement with parents in the school system, which always brings improvement. The tests' scores of these students are continually rising, along with a Presidential award to one of the schools. Southlake appears to really care about the community, that spirit develops with new homeowners and they become involved to keep a close knit community. Neighbors look out for each other, which deters crime. We chose Southlake because of the planned communities and I read that people are moving toward planned communities, Southlake seems to be fulfilling that need for the future that will bring opportunity. Southlake is not landlocked the way some suburbs are and it has the space to give people a place to live close to the city but allows them to feel as if they are in the country. 7,(14 do you uuutt to pivet;cybate t c 44rgDSRS'TT SGlen'441 5? My family has always instilled the importance of giving back to the community. I believe that the leadership program will teach me how the community of Southlake works in order to make a better future for the area in which we live.Living the example in my opinion is the best way to teach your children. I would like my children to be involved as they are growing up, as this teaches them to be responsible for themselves and their surroundings. Worn did you Pad out about 44/47,ER 'WIP SCY'4 i $? The booklet produced by the Chamber of Commerce telling about the community had an article about the leadership program. A friend from Midland, Texas participated in LEADERSHIP MIDLAND and she recommended me to become involved. PAGE 5 L City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM November 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Oakwood Pond Developer Agreement Amendment Friday, Oct. 6, 1995, the affected property owners in the Ridgecrest area, their attorneys, Southlake City Attorney Alan Taylor, and Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead met to discuss the drainage problem. The parties involved came to an understanding of what each party would-do. To try to resolve the issue, a request was made to seek the City Council's direction on installing an underground drain across Mr. Shelton's property. At the October 17, 1995 City Council meeting, Council agreed to amend the Oakwood Pond Developer Agreement by reducing the Street Perimeter Fee up to 50%. Attached is the Oakwood Pond Developer Agreement Amendment. It shows the present language of the PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE and goes on to state the new language. Please place this on the November 7, 1995 agenda for Council consideration. BW/sm Attachment wpdoc s\wthead.mem\age nda\okwood.am /D-A C Tom Miller 5604 Oak Top Colleyville, Texas 76034 Subject: Oakwood Pond Developer Agreement Amendment Paragraph C.PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE on page 4 in the Oakwood Pond Developer Agreement reads as follows: "The Developer agrees to pay the Perimeter Street Fee of$47.50 per linear foot. Approximately 1,270 feet of the development abuts on Ridgecrest, which will require a Perimeter Street Fee of$12,026.51." City Council has considered Mr. Miller's request to reduce the Perimeter Street to cover the costs of constructing a drain pipe along Dove Road. The amendment to Paragraph C. PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE will read as follows: "Perimeter Street Fee is$12,026.51. Because the Developer will construct a drain pipe to alleviate a flooding condition,he has requested a credit toward the construction cost. The Council hereby agrees to grant up to 50%credit,which will require a Perimeter Street Fee of$6,013.25. Developer must provide a copy of the drainage improvement contract to the City. If construction costs are less than 50%of the Perimeter Street Fee of$12,026.51,Developer receives credit for the actual construction cost." SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER By: Date: C ram•. Amendment to Oakwood Pond Developer Agreement Page 2. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE By: Gary Fickes,Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary (0, Date: C • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Finalization of Intersection Alignments Dove and White Chapel Dove and Carroll Authorization to Bid During the design of improvements for Dove Road(between White Chapel and Kimball)the design engineer (Rady Associates) was directed to analyze improvements to the intersections at White Chapel and Carroll. In a previous session with the City Council,,staff presented alternatives for these intersection realignments. Council gave us specific direction on the realignment of the intersection of Dove and Carroll which we are presenting herein. The estimated additional cost of this realignment is$140,000 and will require the acquisition of approximately 1 acre of land(based upon acquisition to satisfy the ultimate right-of-way). The interim section improvements could be made with the acquisition of approximately 0.75 acres. Council did not propose that the intersection at White Chapel be improved;however we feel that this issue needs to be addressed one final time prior to this project being advertised for bid. The realignment developed by Rady would require the acquisition of 0.85 acres.Of this,0.52 is available from Maguire Thomas as part of their submittal for the Solana project.The remaining acreage would be located on the south side of Dove and east of White Chapel. This realignment would require that approximately 28 trees between 4" diameter and 20" diameter be removed for the construction of the interim road. An additional 15 -20 trees would need to be removed to satisfy the ultimate road section for this alignment. The only other realignment would require the purchase and removal of a new residence with a taxed value of$133,500.The cost for this realignment alternative is estimated to be $100,000. We would like final direction from City Council on these two intersection improvements so that right-of-way c be obtained and so that we can proceed with advertising this project for bids. RJH/rjh P L k -G- TRACT 2C 15.0 AC SCALE: 1' - 50• I 1 O 1 t_ I I TEL MARKER-if. TEL wino..".7 • — a T F. 1 I a -Aco'%/j%%/ .A.1 N I = ` I 2 DOVE DT 0Z TC R.C3W. TAKE FOR a ,,, UL MATE SECTION axo :, -C R.O.W. TAKE FOR ULTIMATE SECTION TRACT 1� 7.93 AC 107T, DOVE ROAD Limiiimor. A __ -- -- 5113 TRACT SA AC 3.95 AC PARCEL APPROX. AREA LOT/TRAC NO. ACRES NO. 6 0.11 1C 7 0.24 1 , 8 0.06 1G 9 0.05 2 1 10 0.04 5A3 11 0.03 5A1 12 0.14 2A3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 13 0.07 BLK 1, LO1 DOVE ROAD 14 0.29 BLK 1, LOT RIGHT—OF—WAY EXHIBITS NOTE: INTERSECTION AT CARROLL ROAD PROPERTY UNE AND RIGHT—OF—WAY INFORMATION FROM TARRANT APPRAISAL VERIFIED. ALL TRACT ACREAGES ARE APPROXIMATELi ss A�T fTte�� ..^�.♦{ ❑_n ,au' l�WI.e A a1 lona a K ey-Hom and mandates,Inc. 919 DMa a9.w fat 9Ta9.T.r. T9@ roW9499 OE9Ki1 BY: CDT DATE:RVMS BY: DATE: AUGUST 1995 DRAM BY: D•6 JOG NO.: 069421500 - DHECKCD BY: CMS SHEET M0. 2 N P • PARCEL APPROX. AREA LOI NO. ACRES 1 0.10 2 0.14 3 0.28 4 0.26 5 0.07 SCALE: 1. A. 50' NOTE: PROPERTY LINE AND RIGHT—OF—WAY INFORMATION FROM TARRAN VERIFIED. ALL TRACT ACREAGES ARE APPROXIMATE. A-1207 1 (ire' TRACT IC TRACT 18 — I w1 wam DOVE ROAD � '� , • T 2R1 LOT 2R2 LOT SA OO • AMAYA ADDN. BLOCK 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE DOVE ROAD • RIGHT—OF—WAY EXHIBITS INTERSECTION AT WHITE CHAPEL ROAD ralRady&Assodates A dvIs m i IOmley.Hom and Assoda es,YTc. SW tar Banal Ia,l WSW.Tr. 1•m RIB DESIGN BY: GBT OATE:BEM9ON5 BY: OATS: FEBBUARY 1990 DSNSW BY: DR JOB NO.: 06942000 OEC11E0 BY: CAS "BET NO. 1 Oi 2 !o 6 3 va,aTM .17 a..C. • ---- City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Contract for Engineering Services for the Booster Pump Station and Ground Storage Tank on the North Side of Town Background Cheatham and Associates are currently under contract to design a booster pump station and ground storage tank in the vicinity of F.M. 1709 and Pearson Lane. This ground storage tank would provide Southlake with additional quantity of water from the Southlake-Keller transmission main from Fort Worth's North Beach Street tank. The Northeast Tarrant County Regional Water Supply Planning Report, April 1995, by Alan Plummer and Associates shows that Southlake needs to have a new transmission main, a ground storage tank, and a booster pump station in the north part of town (see Figure V-1). UD's and involved cities' staffs are continuing to meet regularly. The purpose is to bring to the various Councils and Boards recommendations on how to implement the planning study. Such recommendations should be formulated around the first of the year 1996. Proposal Attached is a proposal from Cheatham and Associates to prepare construction plans and documents for a pump station and ground storage tank to be located in the vicinity of T.W. King Road and S.H. 114. The fee for this design is $125,595 (see proposal, page 3). This fee includes surveying, engineering design, and any necessary easement preparation. It does not include soils testing, outside lab services, easement acquisition, or any revisions to stated proposal. [Note: This proposal includes a 10% discount on the fee ($139,550 - $13,955 = $125,595) because Cheatham and Associates are currently designing a booster pump station located at Pearson Road and F.M. 1709.] Please place this on the November 7, 1995 agenda for Council review and consideration. gffiftr`4°1 L)W/sm /Q C. Attachments: Figure V-1 Proposal wpdocs\wthead.mem\agexia\chtbstps.wpd ' Alan Plummer and Associates, Inc. 14111 N.E. Tarrant County Regional Water Supply Plan ,,,, Proposed Improvements - 1997 1.32 Roanoke Trophy\J v Club 3.56 MGO MCC ��� 20- 1.60 MCO 131.50 MCO "o • Westlake i , c Ll 21- 124" — • 30 CAYLOR II TANK Keller Southlake (wor :III- 4.02 MCO 7.55 MC0 I I 7.00 moo ° IN PEARSON ° TANK 2 ") 36- I I . 1 I N. BEACH — TANK m! I I 1- g F 1 Legend 13 2. Transmission Unes 1 Existing Proposed —•— Existing Ft. Worth I FIGURE V-1 Note: Location and sizes shown for x proposed facilities are preliminary. L Actual routings and locations to be determined during detailed design. /DC ,P— CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES October 23, 1995 Mr. Bob Whitehead Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Proposal for Providing Professional Services in Connection with the Design of Booster Pumping Station & Ground Storage Tank to be Located T.W. King Road/S.H. 114 Vicinity CONSULTANT'S UNDERSTANDING The City of Southlake is proposing to construct a second booster pumping station and ground storage tank, in the vicinity of T.W. King Road and S.H. 114. Once this facility is complete, it will be incorporated with the pumping station on Alta Vista in Ft. Worth, into the City's system, serving the low pressure plane. This new facility isto increase the 1rrequired.. quantity of water into the SouthIs P system, s current rate of growth will soon exceed the available supply from Alta Vista, which can be pumped directly into the system. In that regard, Southlake has directed Cheatham&Associates to prepare construction plans and associated documents, to facilitate the construction of the proposed pumping station and ground storage tank. It has not been determined exactly where the proposed facility will be located. The final site selection will be determined, based upon several factors such as land costs, and availability of a site. Once the site is selected, the final design can proceed. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Surveying 1.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary surveying field and office work necessary to perform the engineering design and to prepare construction plans. 1.2 We will also furnish all construction staking. 1.3 Surveying for easement preparation, if required, will also be furnished. (See Item 3.2) (iv /D 3 ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design,Inc. 1601 E.Lamar Blvd. •Suite 200•Arlington,Texas 76011 817/548-0696 • Metro 265-8836•Fax 817/265-8532 • • • ci Mr. Bob Whitehead October 23, 1995 City of Southlake Page 2 2.0 Engineering 2.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary technical expertise required to accomplish the engineering design of the pumping station, ground storage tank and supply line. The design will be in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. 2.2 Our firm will then prepare construction plans, specifications and contract documents based on the engineering design. 2.3 We will assist in the advertising for and taking of construction bids. We will issue any required addendums. Our firm will assist in the processing of contract documents after contract award and will issue notice-to-proceed. 2.4 Periodic on-site visits by an engineer will take place during construction. We will issue and process any required change orders. 2.5 We will provide assistance in conducting the final inspection and issuance of certificate of completion. 3.0 Easements (if required) 3.1 Our firm will conduct the search for deeds and conduct other research at the Tarrant County Courthouse necessary for the preparation of the required easements. 3.2 We will then prepare the legal (metes &bounds) descriptions of the easements with computer plotting. This work element also includes the surveying work necessary to prepare easements and to tie easements to the base line(s). 3.3 This element includes preparation of the final written easement document and of the accompanying drawing. 3.4 This proposal does not contemplate our firm providing assistance in acquiring property owner's signatures, nor participating in any condemnation proceedings without additional compensation. 4.0 Inspection 4.1 We will not furnish full-time on-site construction inspection, but will make periodic visits to the site, and will be available for plan interpretations. FEES We will provide all the services and products described in the scope of services including all services necessary for engineering surveying, engineering, preparation of construction plans and specifications, preparation of construction cost estimates, contract administration, construction staking and periodic visits during construction, and as built plans. [See Engineer's Estimate and Excerpts from the TSPE General Engineering Services Manual on the last three pages.] /D C • • • • Mr. Bob Whitehead October 23, 1995 City of Southlake Page 3 *Engineering Fee (total project cost of$1,883,000) [Based on TSPE Curve A, 7.0% of Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost] $ 131,800.00 Surveying Fees [Flat fees based on estimate of time required times hourly rate for field party] Design Survey $ 5,000.00 Construction Staking $ 2,750.00 Easement Preparation(if required) [Flat Fees based on estimate of time required times hourly rates for technicians] Research N/A Documents/drawings/field work N/A Subtotal Professional Fees $ 139,550.00 Since Cheatham&Associates is currently designing a booster pumping station, to be located near Pearson Road and F.M. 1709, some of the design such as detail sheets, chlorination facilities, paving and fencing can be utilized for this project. Therefore, a credit in the amount of 10 percent is offered to the City for this second pump station design. 10% credit = $ 13,955.00 Total Professional Fees (after credit) $ 125,595.00 Please note that all direct expenses, such as travel and printing, are included in the above fees. The fees cover only that work specified in the proposal. It does not include; - Soils testing - Other testing involving outside laboratory services - Revisions to material prepared beyond that specified in proposal The above listing of services or others not included in the basic fees may be added to our agreement at your request and approval of estimated costs or rates. /D C c, Mr. Bob Whitehead October 23, 1995 City of Southlake Page 4 FEE SCHEDULE 1/01/95 Professional fees for studies and reports are calculated using hourly rates which include all wages, benefits,overhead and profit. The fees include all incidental costs and expenses(except where specifically noted), including all travel,out-of-pocket expenses, drafting,telephone, typing, etc.,plus direct expenses times a handling multiplier. The fees proposed for this project are based on the hours estimated for each phase of the project times hourly rates. The following is the current rate schedule used to calculate job fees. Principal Engineer $90.00 registered Engineer $75.00 Registered Surveyor $75.00 Staff Engineer $70.00 CAD Technician $65.00 Technician $55.00 Construction Inspector $45.00 Drafter $45.00 Clerical/Technical Typist $45.00 4 Man Survey Crew $85.00 3 Man Survey Crew • $75.00 TERMS Invoicing will be based on percentage of completion. Billing will normally occur around the first of each month and payment expected within ten working days. GUARANTEE Cheatham&Associates guarantee to maintain the fees presented herein for 90 days from the date of this proposal unchanged. boc6 Mr. Bob Whitehead October 23, 1995 City of Southlake Page 5 If the above meets with your approval, this pro. ,sal can also serve as our agreement, which you may indicate by signing in the space provi. -. below. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or requested modifications of the proposal. The opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Southlake is greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. f:\worchproposansouthlaldking.bps C AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: Accepted this day of , 1995 By: Title: • !oc7 (...." CHEATHAM&ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER PUMP STATION W/5,000,000 GROUND STORAGE TANK LOCATED ON T.W.KING RD.,NORTH OF S.H.114 DATE: OCTOBER 20,1995 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT TOTAL NO. QTY. PRICE COST 1 5M GROUND STORAGE TANK 165'X 32' EA. 1 800000.00 $800,000.00 2 CONTROL BUILDING 20'X 40' S.F. 800 80.00 $64,000.00 3 -YARD PIPING LS. 1 100000.00 $100,000.00 4 SUCTION&DISCHARGE HEADER LS. 1 100000.00 $100,000.00 5 PUMP SUCTION CANS(5)W/CONC.SLAB L.S. 1 80000.00 $80,000.00 6 ELECTRICAL CONTROLS L.S. 1 355000.00 $355,000.00 7 VERTICAL TURBINE PUMPS EA. 5 40000.00 $200,000.00 8 SITE PREPARATION-GRADING L.S.(1) 1 12000.00 $12,000.00 9 ACCESS DRIVE-PARKING-FENCE LS. 1 40000.00 $40,000.00 10 LANDSCAPING-SEEDING&MISC.IRRIGATION LS. 1 12000.00 $12,000.00 11 METER W/METER VAULT LS. 1 ' 35000.00 $35,000.00 12 TELEMETRY SYSTEM W/INTERFACE LS. 1 40000.00 $40,000.00 13 CHLORINATION BLDG.&EQUIP. L.S. 1 45000.00 $45,000.00 SUBTOTAL CONST.COST $1,883,000.00 CONST.CONTINGENCY $111,000.00 ENGINEERING/SURVEYING $140,000.00 LAND $166,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,300,000.00 SOUTHLAKKINGIVR !D C e Curve A is intended to apply to assignments of which the following are typical examples: Water, wastewater and industrial waste treatment plants Low cost, or complicated,waterfront and marine terminal facilities Complicated dams and hydro-power installations Small bridges and bridges which are complicated by involved geo- metrics and unsymmetrical features, or which require location and/or alternate design studies Grade crossing eliminations Urban streets and freeways,including related drainage facilities Water distribution lines under 16-inch diameter Sanitary sewage collection lines under 24-inch diameter Pumping stations Air pressure tunnels Swimming pools Foundations Curve $ is intended to apply to less complicated assignments of which the following are examples: Large intercepting and relief sewers Storm sewers and drains Sanitary sewage collection lines 24-inch diameter and over Water distribution lines 16-inch diameter and over Simple bridges and other structures of straightforward or conven- tional design Dams of average complexity Airport paving and grading Irrigation works, except pumping plants I Railways Levees and flood walls,conventional Sewer and water tunnels(free air) Earthwork and dredging Highways and rural roads,except low-cost rural roads High-cost wharf facilities of conventional design Retaining walls and bulkheads, conventional Roads and streets (11, /0C9 t6 ' k Curves of Medians Compensation CURVES A AND B ci • +• ._ m 0o 0m d0 ti. -4 o m Cc° o .G t W y 3 C O -1 'C C� 7,, O 7 N *' CV> 0 b4 i O O E. C � y a tE c . N �c 0 0 ,_ d d . v s ca .= d ai O = I S s 3 c., N 3 a O, . T: c0 s 3 00i o0 0C •° o C el N ���MN��.. a ME�����MI� =�MEMI ." d W a1 d >.' =.1111111.1.1111111.11 aW =I•���•1•1��IMM� 0 R .0 111.11111111111.1111111111 MI����•1�W/��1��� o R m _ ��1•���� w a IM��MI�■�//�II1��� cn cc Q ■`11h ° 3 ■ ■ ■■■ ■■■■■■■��■ �■■> y me In t• ■ ■ . o IIIIIIIIIII tclei.- immummourilm cn E . o o t R Z 2 a�'i c r� ■� -- ZO (tie,C x N V U)4 ri -- 1 J E O. v vC C O. G (Jul.u0 E � � / / v= ■■■■■■■■■■ . ■■E■■■■■■■ c o c .= 'toVI c ■■■■■■■■■ I. ,�■■■■■■■ U.O = l' CO O-V i C cn a`� L. E 4a— 0 0 Mc 0 v o = C .41. 0 3 R d5 v c .., Z v_1 °1 0 ._..v •° a 0 0 .n d 4-• a E d E C~J Ca 00 0o vc,c a o in Z a' a 0. 0 tc —� C•p 11JRo U � o v r_ - O C >> O R p Y1 0 i rb.. V y"' V O 0.y U.0 C V OC N F- • � a38 � R an`13d 'C 0) C 41 +O+ G 4 C O NIICa .cRCU tom V+ Cosi..ar O O E C 'r+ N O d t O44f dOv. v= h N . . o a to 0 .4 0 0) 01 P. 40 in 'Q 0 ./ .. .4 .4 .. W iN33213d-3921VH3 DISVB t- 0 Z 10 C to City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Revised Investment Policy House Bill No. 2459 was approved during the most recent Legislative session, amending the Public Funds Investment Act. The bill requires changes in the City's existing Investment Policy, initially approved by the Council in September 1993. The Investment Policy submitted for City Council approval incorporates the required modifications. The Investment Policy has been reviewed and recommended for approval by our Investment Advisor, Richard Long of First Southwest Company. The proposed Investment Policy is considerably more detailed than the previous Policy. I have highlighted the significant changes in the proposed policy. A brief discussion of the relevant changes are listed below: (sr 1. Written investment policy reviewed annually by Council, Section I-C, page 1. 2. Investment strategy - Each fund component must have a stated investment strategy, as stated in Section II, page 1. 3. Addition of Project/Chief Accountant as Investment Officer - The previous policy only named the Director of Finance. This will designate an Investment Officer in my absence. Director retains ultimate authority, Section III-A, page 2. 4. Investment training - Investment Officers are required to obtain training within 12 months of assuming duties, Section III-A, page 2. 5. Ethics and conflicts of interest - Personal (Investment Officer) business activity with persons proposing investment transactions with the City requires disclosure to the Texas Ethics Commission and City Council, Section III-C, page 2. 6. Excluding certain investments - Interest only and principal only securities, greater than 10 year collateralized mortgage obligations, REMIC's, and inverse index collateralized mortgage obligations are all excluded, Section V-A, page 5 and Section V-B, page 7. 7. Including money market mutual funds as authorized investments - These are regulated by the SEC, only those with a $1 net asset value, Section V-A 9, page 6. 8. Institution certification- Any firm doing business with the City must acknowledge receipt and review of the City's investment policy by signing a Certification, Section VII-D and Appendix "A", pages 11 and 13. 9. Reporting - A quarterly written report is to be submitted to the Council regarding investment transaction for all funds, Section VIII, page 12. l0-� LCurtis E. Hawk November 1, 1995 Revised Investment Policy page 2 These policy changes will not affect what the City is currently doing with its investment portfolio. The City presently maintains approximately 25% of its $15 million portfolio in TexPool, 20% in certificates of deposit, and the balance in U.S. Government Securities. The City's primary investment objectives remain the same as before: 1. the protection of principal; 2. liquidity; and 3. yield. Much of the changes written into the law are partially as a result of circumstances in California with its investment pool losses. Also, the Odessa College (Texas) investment losses and the TexPool situation in 1994 due to rising interest rates and subsequent market losses caused lawmakers to tighten requirements and address specific investments. Please place this item on the City Council agenda November 7 for consideration. • L A:i:��r+ice:. .:._.�,�..._,_�uvv.._.W....................._ ...� ._._._._._..... .. ._.. .. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE INVESTMENT POLICY Amended , 1995 L L /D- d 3 (ibe CITY OF SOUTHLAKE INVESTMENT POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Purpose 1 A. Formal Adoption B. Scope C. Review and Amendment II. Investment Strategy 1 A. Operating Funds B. Debt Service Funds C. Debt Service Reserve Funds D. Special Projects, Special Purpose, or Construction Funds III. Responsibility and Control 2 A. Delegation of Authority and Training B. Internal Controls • C. Ethics and Conflict of Interest IV. Investment Objectives 2 A. Safety of Principal B. Liquidity C. Yield D. Public Trust („,,, V. Investment Portfolio 5 A. Eligible Investments B. Unauthorized Investments VI. Safekeeping and Custody 8 A. Collateralization B. Allowable Collateral and Collateral Levels C. Monitoring Collateral Adequacy and Additional Collateral Securities D. Collateral Substitution E. Safekeeping F. Delivery versus Payment VII. Selection of Banks and Dealers 11 A. Depository Selection B. Investment Advisors C. Selection of Investment Broker/Dealers and Advisors D. Approved Broker/Dealers and Investment Advisors VIII. Reporting 12 A. Quarterly Reporting Appendix "A" - Certification 13 Appendix "B" - Glossary of Common Treasury Terminology 14 (kir /D— d l` PURPOSE A. Formal Adoption. The purpose of this document is to set forth specific investment policy and strategy guidelines for the City of Southlake in order to achieve the goals of safety, liquidity, yield, and public trust for all investment activity. This Investment Policy is authorized by the City Council in accordance with Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code, the Public Funds Investment Act. B. Scope. This Investment Policy applies to all the investment activities of the City, excluding funds governed by Council approved trust agreements and assets administered for the benefit of the City by outside agencies. In addition to this Policy, bonds funds (as defined by the Internal Revenue Service) shall be managed by their governing ordinance and all applicable State and Federal Law. C. r/u: ii i:i,i%/Q'yQ/ai::' %L::i .;�i �r, e'/.:�' ,/y""///•i/'r'�" /• ? /r .„i„: L%i::i iii''�%f%;4�// q'/%i/,':'7„-�'',[i' ... 4,/,, //%% / /�/ r%..ro. g / ; A.../' /.:fir ,',' /' 05,5/ ::;:§�'�//�/ G'/,:':i✓:if/,Q' G:3:;Jli':i%'/:.L; ; „/`/�/y/j'/• ••. /�y• ; '/: .; .r, i7�5•/��i' i; (/9ii9' co:".j �. ' ass;,� ai<•, 3 ':is A (kar City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended .I995 1 /D� d ;���%" r . / � " GU setiy 1 r % / 4:4�I4Sfrr�'c r i;e%.�44J j�/Ir.„.,,,•' • r•.'!• ,'4•r4 :h • �%'/,/r//r:: S: % "/ s %: :4 ui :4446iif i•i/6%4 %y III. RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL A. Delegation of Authority and Training. The Director of Finance and are designated as Investment Officer(s) of the City and are responsible for investment decisions and activities. The Director of Finance will retain ultimate responsibility for investment decisions. B. Internal Controls. The Investment Officer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived. C. Ethics and Conflicts of Interest. City staff involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair the ability to make impartial investment decisions. e � � r IV. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES The City of Southlake shall manage and invest its cash with four objectives, listed in order of priority: Safety, Liquidity, Yield, and Public Trust. The safety of the principal invested always remains the primary objective. All investments shall be designed and managed in a manner responsive to the public trust and consistent with State and Local law. L City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 2 �a�d 6 Cie A. Safety of Principal. The City shall seek to control the risk of loss due to the failure of a security issuer or grantor. Such risk shall be controlled by investing only in the safest types of securities as defined in Section V-A of this Policy, through portfolio diversification by investment type and maturity, and by collateralization as required by law. 1. Diversification by Investment Type. Diversification by investment type shall be maintained by ensuring an active and efficient secondary market in portfolio investments and by controlling the market and opportunity risks associated with specific investment types. Diversification by investment type shall be established by the following maximum percentages of investment type to the total investment portfolio: a. U.S. Government Securities 100% b. States, Agencies, Counties, Cities and Other 50% c. Repurchase Agreements 50% d. Certificates of Deposit 100% e. Bankers Acceptances 20% f. Commercial Paper 20% g. Money Market Mutual Funds 50% h. Eligible Investment Pools 100% (re 2. Diversification by Investment Maturity. In order to minimize risk of loss due to interest rate fluctuations, investment maturities will not exceed the anticipated cash flow requirements of the funds. The City of Southlake intends to match the holding periods of investment funds with liquidity needs of the City. The maximum final stated maturity of any investment shall not exceed five years. Maturity guidelines by fund are as follows: a. Operating Funds. The weighted average days to maturity for the operating fund portfolio shall be 365 days or less and the maximum allowable maturity shall be three years. b. Debt Service Funds. Debt Service Funds shall be invested to ensure adequate funding for each consecutive debt service payment. The Investment Officer shall invest in such a manner as not to exceed an "unfunded" debt service date with the maturity of any investment. An unfunded debt service date is defined as a coupon or principal payment date that does not have cash or investment securities available to satisfy said payment. c. Debt Service Reserve Funds. Market conditions, Bond Resolution constraints and Arbitrage regulation compliance will be considered City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended .1995 3 (kr' when formulating Reserve Fund strategy. Maturity limitation shall generally not exceed the call provisions of the Bond Ordinance and shall not exceed the final maturity of the bond issue. All Debt Service Reserve Fund investment maturities shall not exceed five years. d. Special Project, Special Purpose, and Construction Funds. The investment maturity of bond proceeds shall generally be limited to the anticipated cash flow requirement. City funds that are considered "bond proceeds" for arbitrage purposes will be invested using a more conservative approach than the standard investment strategy when arbitrage rebate rules require refunding excess earnings. All earnings in excess of the allowable arbitrage earnings will be segregated and made available for any necessary payments to the U.S. Treasury. 3. Collateralization. Collateralization of securities will be made in compliance with Section VI of this Policy. B. Liquidity. Liquidity shall be achieved by anticipating cash flow requirements, by investing in securities with active secondary markets and by investing in eligible money market mutual funds and local government investment pools. A security,, may be liquidated to meet unanticipated cash requirements, to re-deploy cash into other investments expected to outperform current holdings, or otherwise to adjust the portfolio. C. Yield. The City of Southlake's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account investment risk constraints and cash flow characteristics of the portfolio. D. Public Trust. Investments shall be made with judgement and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and • intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of capital as well as the probable income to be derived. 4 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,I995 /Dd V. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO A. Eligible Investments. Investments described below are authorized by Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code as eligible securities for the City. City funds governed by this Policy may be invested in: 1. Obligations of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities, 2. Direct obligations of the State of Texas, or its agencies and instrumentalities. 3. Other obligations, the principal and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by, or backed by the full faith and credit of, the State of Texas or the United States or their respective agencies and instrumentalities, A 4. Obligations of states, agencies, counties, cities, and other political ,. subdivisions of any State having been rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm and having received a rating of not less than "A" or its equivalent. 5. Fully collateralized repurchase agreements having a defined termination date, placed through a primary government securities dealer, as defined by the Federal Reserve, or a bank domiciled in Texas, and secured by obligations described in Section V-A 1 above which are eligible investments under the Public Funds Investment Act, pledged with a third party selected and approved by the City, and having a market value of not less than the principal amount of the funds disbursed. The term includes direct security repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements structured in compliance with the Texas Government Code. All City repurchase agreement transactions shall be governed by a signed Master Repurchase Agreement. 6. Certificates of deposit issued by state and national banks domiciled in Texas that are: a. guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor; or, secured by obligations that are described by City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 5 D —d Cie Section V-A 1 through 4 above, which are intended to include all direct Federal agency or instrumentality issued mortgage backed securities, but excluding those mortgage backed securities of the nature described in Section V-B, that have a market value of not less than the principal amount of the certificates or in any other manner and amount provided by law for deposits of the City; b. governed by a Depository Contract, as described in Section VII-A, that complies with Federal and State regulation to properly secure a pledged security interest; and, c. solicited for bid orally, in writing, electronically, or any combination of those methods. 7. Bankers' acceptances that: a. have stated maturities of 270 days or fewer, b. will be liquidated in full at maturity, c. is eligible for collateral borrowing from a Federal Reserve Bank, (rarr and, d. is accepted by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state, if the short-term obligations of the bank, or of the bank holding company of which the bank is the largest subsidiary, are rated not less than "A-1" or "P-1" or an equivalent rating by at least one nationally recognized credit rating agency. 8. Commercial paper with a stated maturity of 270 days or less from the date of issuance that either: a. is rated not less than "A-1", "P-1", or the equivalent by at least two nationally recognized credit rating agencies; or b. is rated at least "A-1", "P-1", or the equivalent by at least one nationally recognized credit rating agency and is fully secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state thereof. 9. LP" City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 6 lV— "_ �D 01• 1%;:4:5 / , /i, i ���i%,�y.,.;, y��y /jai/ a./.':':/r /. i�G:i/r S:'i8'/;i/:i ii %lgGi:r-,.; r/,%/i%y', /�/� //5 ,//�!/'// ,G�% y y /W 4 yi: y.'/i i%i:: r%'r r.! ,:'r.'Q i.// •/.., e ir,., „�%%/j'r. i ;i/i9..i„:„.. /:i%;% yiSL':i.i:i/ i,�y ;2i';,en./ a p. r• ///. r G 10. Eligible Investment Pools as defined in Section 2256.016 of the Texas Government Code provided that: a. investment in the particular pool has been authorized by the City Council; b. the pool shall have furnished the Investment Officer an offering circular containing the information required by Section 2256.016(b) of the Texas Government Code; c. the pool shall furnish to the Investment Officer investment transaction confirmations with respect to all investments made with it; d. the pool shall furnish to the Investment Officer monthly reports that contain the information required by Section 2256.016(c) of the Texas Government Code; e. the pool's investment objectives shall be to maintain a stable net asset value of one dollar ($1); f. whose investment philosophy and strategy are consistent with this Policy and the City's ongoing investment strategy; and g• the pool provides evidence of credit rating no lower than "AAA" or "AAA-m" by at least one nationally recognized credit rating service. B. 7 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 / r i VI. SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY A. Collateralization. Consistent with the requirements of State Law, the City requires all bank deposits to be federally insured or collateralized with eligible securities. Financial institutions serving as City Depositories will be required to sign a Depository Agreement with the City and City's safekeeping agent. The safekeeping portion of the Agreement shall define the City's rights to the collateral in case of default, bankruptcy, or closing and shall establish a perfected security interest in compliance with Federal and State regulations, including: 1. the Agreement must be in writing; 2. the Agreement has to be executed by the Depository and the City contemporaneously with the acquisition of the asset; 3. the Agreement must be approved by the Depository's Board of Directors or loan committee, and a copy of the meeting minutes must delivered to the City; and, 4. the Agreement must be part of the Depository's "official record" continuously since its execution. Repurchase agreements must also be secured in accordance with State Law. Each counter party to a repurchase transaction is required to sign a copy of the Public Securities Association Master Repurchase Agreement. An executed copy of the Agreement must be on file before the City will enter into any transactions with a counter party. B. Allowable Collateral and Collateral Levels. 1. Certificates of Deposit. Eligible securities for collateralization of deposits are defined by the Public Funds Collateral Act, as amended, and meet the constraints of this Policy. The market value of the principal portion of p City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 0 to_ d �z collateral pledged for certificates of deposit must at all times be equal to or greater than the par value of the certificate of deposit plus accrued interest, less the applicable level of FDIC insurance. 2. Repurchase Agreements. Securities underlying repurchase agreements are limited to U.S. Government, Agencies and Instrumentalities obligations, which are eligible for wire transfer (i.e. book entry) to the City's designated safekeeping agent through the Federal Reserve System and meet the constraints of this Policy. A repurchase agreement's security value shall be the par value plus accrued interest, and the security's market value must be maintained at the following minimum levels: Agreement Maturities Greater Than One Business Day U.S. Treasury Securities 102% U.S. Agency and Instrumentalities 103% Mortgage Backed Securities 105% Agreement Maturities of One Business Day All Securities 100% C. Monitoring Collateral Adequacy and Additional Collateral Securities. (6.9 1. Certificates of Deposit. The City shall require monthly reports with market values of pledged securities from all financial institutions with which the City has certificates of deposit. The Investment Officer will monitor adequacy of collateralization levels to verify market values and total collateral positions. If the collateral pledged for a certificate of deposit falls below the par value of the deposit, plus accrued interest less FDIC or other insurance, the institution issuing the certificate of deposit(s) will be notified by the Investment Officer and will be required to pledge additional securities no later than the end of the next succeeding business day. 2. Repurchase Agreements. Weekly monitoring by the Investment Officer of market values of all underlying securities purchased for City repurchase transactions is required. More frequent monitoring may be necessary during periods of market volatility. If the value of the securities underlying a repurchase agreement falls below the margin maintenance levels specified above, the Investment Officer will request additional securities. If the repurchase agreement is scheduled to mature within five business days and the amount is deemed to be immaterial, then the request is not necessary. D. Collateral Substitution. Collateralized certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements often require substitution of collateral. Any broker, dealer or financial 9 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 /6- d /3 (re institution requesting substitution must contact the Investment Officer for approval and settlement. The substituted security's value will be calculated and substitution approved if its value is equal to or greater than the required security level. The Investment Officer, or a designees, must provide written notification of the decision to the bank or the safekeeping agent holding the security prior to any security release. Substitution is allowable for all transactions, but should be limited, if possible, to minimize potential administrative problems and transfer expense. The Investment Officer may limit substitution and assess appropriate fees if substitution becomes excessive or abusive. E. Safekeeping. The City shall contract with a bank or banks for the safekeeping of securities either owned by the City as part of its investment portfolio or as part of its depository and repurchase agreements. All collateral securing bank deposits must be held by a third-party banking institution acceptable to and under contract with the City, or by the Federal Reserve Bank. The securities purchased under a repurchase agreement must be delivered to a third-party custodian with which the City has established a safekeeping agreement. F. Delivery versus Payment. The purchase of individual securities shall be executed "delivery versus payment" (DVP) through the City's Safekeeping Agent. By so doing, City funds are not released until the City has received, through the (1.? Safekeeping Agent, the securities purchased. The security shall be held in the name of the City or held on behalf of the City. The Safekeeping Agent's records shall assure the notation of the City's ownership of or explicit claim on the securities. The original copy of all safekeeping receipts shall be delivered to the City. VII. SELECTION OF BANKS AND DEALERS. A. Depository Selection. A qualified depository shall be selected through the City's banking services procurement process, which shall include a formal request for • proposal (RFP). The centralization of depository services is designed to maximize investment capabilities while minimizing service costs. The selection of a depository shall be based on the financial institution offering the most favorable terms and conditions at the least cost, while adhering to the guidelines and provisions within the request for proposal. In selecting a depository, the City shall give consideration to the financial institution's credit characteristics, financial history, service capabilities, and costs for required services. The City's depository contract shall be for three years with an option to extend for an additional two years upon mutual agreement of the depository and the City. Specialized services may be contracted for by the City with another financial institution or company if 10 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 / (my, the depository cannot provide such service or charges more for the same service with little or no appreciable benefit. B. Investment Advisors. The City may contract with an investment advisor, who shall adhere to the spirit, philosophy and specific term of this Policy and shall invest within the same "Standard of Care". C. Selection of Investment Broker/Dealers and Advisors. Selection will be performed by the Investment Officer, with ratification and approval by the City Council. Selected Investment Advisors and Broker/Dealers shall provide timely transaction confirmations and monthly portfolio reports. Prospective Broker/Dealers shall provide financial and other information as requested by the Investment Officer sufficient to evaluate their fiscal condition and ability to service the City. The Investment Officer will establish criteria to evaluate Investment Advisors and Broker/Dealers, including: 1. Adherence to the City's policies and strategies, 2. Investment performance and transaction pricing within accepted risk constraints, 3. Responsiveness to the City's request for services, information and open (0..„ communication, 4. Understanding of the inherent fiduciary responsibility of investing public funds, and 5. Similarity in philosophy and strategy with the City's objectives. D. V %A /% r�i:_': J��/r;:�i:' lc /r.:G ; i i:•!:;i:'i: ................ 2t,;, s�%;,.:% :.:.•„ . ��i�!� .:,i* .a'sa;2 's 'ss 4 t;,i, /y1/ . ./ �/�� , //��/ 1 %/jay% l' �%�/�/pl%�/y�6�/// /i ,•:•.. ;,.;1::.4/k.•;*,: 7!:/ /�tiis: /:::;,t%�,5i'i•.i:;iia.:S•/r1"r'S City of Sout lake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 11 A VIII. REPORTING A. TA A • City o(Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 12 /D-d /6 APPENDIX "A" / •,. ,/ e l r1 4 r�• /i7iai,rr : '/, r 4 i. ii" •is .,,•. •L ,• r /r•,.: .� ., i/;O•95./:i0/5: 3,,%.4/: ..r. ..� ;rir,,.-/ / ,. ra,C r,,..,: •.r.!/? 4 Q L( A i.ir13� City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 13 /•• d /7 APPENDIX "B" GLOSSARY OF COMMON TREASURY TERMINOLOGY Agencies. Federal agency securities. Coupon. The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder Asked. The price at which securities are on the bond's face value. Also, a certificate offered. attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. Bid. the price offered for securities. CUSIP. A unique security identification Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers number assigned to securities maintained and together for a commission paid by the transferred on the Federal Reserve book- initiator of the transaction or by both sides; entry system. in contrast to a "principal" or a "dealer", he does not own or take a position in the Dealer. A dealer, as opposed to a broker, security. In the money market, brokers are acts as a principal in all transactions, buying active in markets in which banks buy and sell and selling for his own account. money and in inter-dealer markets. Debenture. A bond secured only by the Certificate of Deposit (CD). A time deposit general credit of the issuer. with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Delivery versus Payment. Delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the Collateral. Securities, evidence of deposit or securities. other property which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to Depository. The bank selected by the City to securities pledged by a bank to secure provide depository services. deposits of public monies. Discount. The difference between the cost Commercial Paper. Short-term, unsecured price of a security and its value at maturity promissory notes issued by corporations to when quoted a lower than face value. A finance short-term credit needs. Commercial security selling below original offering price paper is usually sold on a discount basis and shortly after sale also is considered to be at a has a maturity at the time of issuance not discount. exceeding nine months. Discount Securities. Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued at a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value, e.g., U.S. Treasury Bills. City of Southlake Imesunem Policy-amended ,1995 14 /d, . /8' L Discount Securities. Non-interest bearing residential mortgages. Freddie Mac money market instruments that are issued at purchases a large volume of conventional a discount and redeemed at maturity for full residential mortgages and uses them to face value, e.g., U.S. Treasury Bills. collateralize mortgage-backed securities. Diversification. Dividing investment funds Federal National Mortgage Association among a variety of securities offering (FNMA or Fannie Mae). FNMA, a federal independent returns. corporation, is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United Federal Credit Agencies. Agencies of the States. It is a private stockholder-owned Federal government set up to supply credit to corporation. The corporation's purchases various classes of institutions and individuals, include a variety of adjustable mortgages and e.g., savings and loans, small business firms, second loans in addition to fixed-rate students, and farmers. mortgages. FNMA's securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FNMA assumes and guarantees that all (FDIC). A federal agency that insures bank security holders will receive timely payment • deposits, currently $100,000 per deposit. of principal and interest. Federal Funds Rate. The rate of interest at Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). which Federal funds are traded. This rate is Consists of seven members of the Federal (1.0, currently set by the Federal Reserve through Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal open-market operations. Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). Created permanent member while the other Presidents in 1932, this system consists of 12 regional serve on a rotating basis. The Committee banks, which are owned by private member periodically meets to set Federal Reserve institutions and regulated by the Federal guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Housing Finance Board. Functioning as a Government Securities in the open-market as credit reserve system, it facilitates extension a means of influencing the volume of bank of credit through its owner-members in order credit and money. to provide access to housing and to improve the quality of communities. Federal Home Federal Reserve System. The central bank Loan Bank issues are joint and several of the United States created by Congress and obligations of the 12 Federal Home Loan consisting of a seven member Board of Banks. Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation are members of the system. (FHLMC or Freddie Mac). A stockholder- owned corporation that provides a continuous Government Agency Issues. Debt securities flow of funds to mortgage lenders, primarily issued by government-sponsored enterprises, through developing and maintaining an active federal agencies, and international nationwide secondary market in conventional institutions. Such securities are not direct City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 15 76t- d /9 Lie obligations of the Treasury and involve government sponsorship or guarantees. Master Repurchase Agreement. To protect investors, many public investors will request Government National Mortgage Association that repurchase agreements be preceded by a (GNMA or Ginnie Mae). Securities master repurchase agreement between the guaranteed by GNMA and issued by investor and the financial institution or mortgage bankers, commercial banks, dealer. The master agreement should defme savings and loan associations, and other the nature of the transaction, identify the institutions. Security holder is protected by relationship between the parties, establish full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. normal practices regarding ownership and Ginnie Mae securities are backed by FHA, custody of the collateral securities during the VA or FMHM mortgages. The term pass- term of investment, provide remedies in the through is often used to describe Ginnie case of default by either party and clarify Maes. issues of ownership. The master repurchase agreement protects the investor by Liquidity. A liquid asset is one that can be eliminating the uncertainty of ownership and converted easily and rapidly into cash hence, allowing investors to liquidate without a substantial loss of value. In the collateral if a bank or dealer defaults during money market, a security is said to be liquid the term of the agreement. if the difference between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be Maturity. The date upon which the principal done at those quotes. or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP). The aggregate of all funds from political Money Market. The market in which short- subdivisions that are placed in the custody of term debt instruments (bills, commercial the a state managed pool, or other qualifying paper, bankers' acceptances, etc.) are issued pool(s)'that meet state statute criteria, for and traded. investment and reinvestment. Mutual Funds. Mutual fund providers are Market Value. The price at which a security investment companies that sell shares to is trading and could presumable be purchased investors, offering investors diversification or sold. and professional portfolio management. Prices fluctuate with the performance of the fund. Money market mutual funds invest in short-term securities such as treasury bills, bank CD's and commercial paper. (46., City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended .1995 16 /O —ct Z Le, Open Market Operations. Purchases and Prudent Person Rule. An investment sales of government and certain other standard. Investments shall be made with securities in the open market by the New judgement and care, under circumstances York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by then prevailing, which persons of prudence, the FOMC in order to influence the volume discretion and intelligence exercise in the of money and credit in the economy. management of their own affairs, not for Purchases inject reserves into the bank speculation, but for investment, considering system and stimulate growth of money and the probable safety of their capital as well as credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open the probable income to be derived. market operations are the Federal Reserve's most important and most flexible monetary Qualified Public Depositories. A financial policy tool. institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or Par. The value of a security as expressed on compensating use or ad valorem taxes under its face (face value) without consideration of the laws of this state, which has segregated a discount or premium. for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its Portfolio. Collection of securities held by an maximum liability and which has been investor. approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. Positive Yield Curve. A condition where (8/0„ interest rates are higher on long-term debt Rate of Return. The yield obtainable on a ' securities than on short-term debt securities security based on its purchase price or its of the same quality. current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond or the Premium. The price that a security demands current income return. over its par value. This is the difference between the price of an instrument and its Rating. A formal opinion by an outside value at maturity (par value) when the price • professional service on the credit reputation is higher than the.maturity. of an issuer and the investment quality of its securities. This opinion is expressed in letter Primary Dealer. A group of government values (e.g., AAA, Baal). securities dealers that submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly Repurchase Agreement(REPO). A holder of financial statements to the Federal Reserve securities sells these securities to an investor Bank of New York and are subject to its with an agreement to repurchase them at a informal oversight. Primary dealers include fixed price on a fixed date. The security Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) "buyer" in effect lends the "seller" money registered securities broker-dealers, banks for the period of the agreement, and the and a few unregulated firms. terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. Dealers use REPO's extensively to finance their positions. 17 City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended /� - a/ Le, Safekeeping. A service to customers U.S. Government Securities. Various types rendered by banks for a fee whereby of marketable securities issued by the U.S. securities and valuables of all types and Treasury, including bills, notes, and bonds. descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for Such securities are direct obligations of the protection. U.S. Government and differ mainly in the length of their maturity. SEC Rule 15C3-1. See uniform net capital rule. Weighted-Average Life. The weighted- average life refers to the average amount of Secondary Market. A market made for the time that will elapse from the date of a purchase and sale of outstanding issues security's issuance until each dollar of following the initial distribution. principal is repaid to the investor. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Yield. The rate of annual income return on Agency created by Congress to protect an investment, expressed as a percentage. investors in securities transactions by (a) Income Yield is obtained by dividing the administering securities legislation. current dollar income by the current market price of the security. (b) Net Yield or Yield Student Loan Marketing Association (Sallie to Maturity is the current income yield minus Mae). A government sponsored entity that any premium above par or plus any discount provides liquidity for private lenders (banks, from par in purchase price, with the (pisavings and loan associations, educational adjustment spread over the period from the institutions, state agencies and other lenders). date of purchase to the date of maturity of Sallie Mae participates in the Federal the bond. Guaranteed Student Loan Program. Uniform Net Capital Rule. Securities and Treasury Bills. A non-interest bearing Exchange Commission requirement that discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury member firms as well as nonmember broker- to finance the national debt. Most bills are dealers in securities maintain a maximum issued to mature in three months, six months, ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to or one year. 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed Treasury Bond. Long-term U.S. Treasury to a firm, including margin loans and securities having initial maturities of more commitments to purchase securities, one than ten years. reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid Treasury Notes. Intermediate term coupon capital includes cash and assets easily bearing U.S. Treasury securities having converted into cash. initial maturities from one to ten years. Zero-Coupon Security. A security that makes no periodic interest payments but instead is sold at a deep discount from its face value. o City of Southlake Investment Policy-amended ,1995 1 /O r W it9411 LEE F.4Hr1jsti15zzac>_ -p Vo/ //'I/Z, Ps, r9 tg I &0POSErZ> p14T LoT 1 /T. P_>F_*_ow AJo.'7Z Arnr_)vrtoA_j 3p2.n.r,=Y Ls. SrEVu��S W v q I, w �z Q W q -AS. r A/ 1�, O � V 1V E 5T ,i F raricN I�ROPEe�y DAF i_oT 2. y7) Co43 s EA jT R U 6Y L . " ,i , V-1. �-384-, 973 APPROVED BY THE PLANNING 8 ZONING :.OMISSION DATE: CHAIRMAN: I'8Z SECRETARY: APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: PIIAYOR: CITY SECRETARY: 1 HIS PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET SLIDE 48� io Esmr'T- I I I / �0 I I� I fJ I TS_80' 1-5/0.600' \ � IOC IJTIL. �SNI+S 380, 036 pp 7 \ 100 50 O zo 40 &0 eD Gri SCALE: l ~= CoD' KNOWN TO ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, David Pollard, do hereby certify [hat I, prepared this plat from an actual and accuralc survey of the land and that the corner monuments shown thereon as set were props ly placed under my supervision in accordence wish the Subdivisio gulations of th3 f So laha. David Pollard, R.P.L.S. N,j.'1 '1ri STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT: Before me the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County, and Staff,, on this day personally appeared David Pollard, a Registered Professional Land SuR ayc'.-, Icr )w to rune to be the person whose name is subscribed to the forgoing instrument, a id 2--knowl^ 1,F. ,; E that he executed the same for the purpose and considerations therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this 3 li* day of M Notary Publiq0tan for the �.t 'V! A~� R N N f+/t A U K /•-- mob" Puhilc '3TATE OF TEXAS I! 4, ; otael. i tY `iA/ 19/96 STATE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT: WHEREAS, WE, Carleo A. and Regina R. Capili, are all of the owners of a tract of land situated in the T. Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, County of Tarrant according to the deed recorded in Volume 11643, Page 0671, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found railroad spike in the West line of the T. Beedy Survey, Abstract No. 72, and being by deed call North, 306.16 feet from the Southwest corner of the above mentioned T. Beedy Survey, said railroad spike also being in the center of N. Peytonville Avenue, formerly known as County Road No. 3088; THENCE North along the West line of said T. Beedy Survey, and the ccenter of N. Peytonville Avenue, a distance of 232.70 feet to a railroad spike for corner, THENCE East, passing at 26.5 feet a found 5/8" iron rod in the East line of said N. Peytonville Avenue and continuing for a total distance of 1871.77 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod in the West line of Garden Addition, an addition in Tarrant County, Texas, and recorded in Volume 388-208, Page 40 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South, along the West line of said addition, a distance of 232.70 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod; THENCE West, passing at 1845.19 feet a found 5/8" iron rod in the East line of N. Peytonville Avenue, and continuing for a total distance of 1871.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 9.857 acres of land. NOW THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, Carleo A. and regina R. Capili, being all of the owners do hereby adapt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as LOTS 2 AND 3, T. BEEDY No. 72 ADDITION, an addition to the City of Southiake, Tarrant County, Texas, and we do hereby dedicate to the publics use forever the rights of way, (alleys, parks) and easements shown thereon Witness our hands at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, this day of 1995 Carieo A. Capili, Owner Regina R. Capili, Owner STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT: Before me the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Carleo A. and Regina R. Capili, owners, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed and in the capicity therein staled. Given under my hand and seal of office, this day of , 1995 Notary Public A P SURVEY COMPANY 1903 CENTRAL DRIVE SUITE # 309 BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 (817) 267-1249 OWNERS CARLEO A and REGINA R. CAPILI 1835 N PEYTONVILLE AVENUE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 164S.Z7 S• Z,7 L-r ll N, N C"XARr->RN p p�iTlunl VoL 388-008 LoT ►v � 01330111010I PLAT SHOWING LOTS 2 AND 3 T. BEEDY NO. 72 ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING 9.857 ACRES IN THE T. BEEDY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 72 OCTOBER 06, 1995 CASE N0. ZA95-99 AD -)AGENT PROPERTY: 01-4NER5: CHURCH OF GHi C-42APEVINE, TEXAS EXI5TINO ZONING: G5 L.U.D.: PUBLIC/5E1"11-PU51- SOUTy�gKF OUR KING NNOSGAPE '-O", TYPE J .j Q M w BUILDING 0V SET BACK SITE PLAN ii, SCALE: I" = 30' 0 10 30 60 ADJACENT PROPERTY: OHP4ER5: GONNER LAM GRAPEVINE, TEXAS EXI5TIN6 ZONING: G-3 MIXED USE ADJACENT PROPERTY: ` \ OWNERS: BLUEBONNET ROAD PARTNERS LTD. DALLAS, TEXAS EXI5TIN6 ZONING: G-3 L.UD.: MIXED USE &0, EV ' O \ ��— NO I - RIGHT -OUT r ONLY DRIVE s -7/, Fr 4... k ,.? .� ?.3i rrz 8!/9C`_ i - LANDSCAPE BUFFER T. 5'-0", TYPE "A" BLDG. 5E TBAGK A-` ADJACENT PROPERTY: OWNERS: 5OUTHLAKE KIMBALL VENTURE, LIMITED DALLAS, TEXAS EXISTING ZONING: G-2 L.U.D.: MIXED USE s SIGNA %- 0". It, E n MW'Tr •... 1"•.iii.iiib.. �.iif •tf 11414 7 M�"I..a...... �� ■see stri iiawuii..., ... •a�i.�ela.a■• .nu...u...... > irue�wser..ewe !f r �� �f���l�� �;n���►�r� ,������I������I�l��.��lli �, I I��i a , , ; � I , 1 i1 ��� ��� u�!�i�n u>a� i ���I�i� , i �IN� �I�, � � (I 'i��' ��� I ;i� 'll �!�� ,r�i���a�u�1�>I�i��� 6�lI� 1����1'',I ��� �i�� �i'dip Ih,� �I�� �,►:��,.II , ==22"'FS 'OT Mt�,UL LCC7C1`IV AREA OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE y� REQUIRED LA ?5CAPE BUFFER _. PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FRO FROM AG TO G -3 - — ELECTRICAL LINE' __W_ - WATER SERVICE LINE' SS - SANITARY SEWER LIN! 'ALL ON SITE UTILITIES TO BE EXISTING 10'-0" UTILITY EASEMENT i EXISTING _'-6" UTILITY EASEMENT --- LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5'-O" TYPE "A" ADJACENT PROPERTY: LOT 1, BLOCK I CARRICK PRESS ADDITION OWNER5: 50UTHLAKE KIMBALL VEhn1 RE, LIMITED DALLAS, TEXAS ry J EXI5TIN6 ZONING: G-3 L.UD.: MIXED USE o a I f'- ,ln SET -BACK 23'-6" A.F.F. T.O. WALL 21'-6" �A.F.F. T.O. ALL -- METAL COPING — ACCENT BRICK OR STONE --- FACE BRICK (o'-0") -- METAL CANOPY (EXTENDS t 3'-0") -- OLA55 STOREFRONT SYSTEM (RECESSED t2'-O") O'-0" FIN. ■� FLOOR SI TE DATA: TOTAL 51TE ACREAGE = 1.54 AG. (80,I7q 5F) RETAIL SITE: EXISTING ZONING = G-3 L. U. D, = MIXED USE NET ACREAGE = BUILDING S.F. = 6350 S.F. BUILDING TO SITE GOVERAGE = 16.15% OPEN SPACE S.F. = 5,930 5F OPEN SPACE TO SITE = 15.1% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: REQUIRED BUFFER YARD: (5,334 5F PROVIDED) REQUIRED PROVIDED CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SCRUBS NORTH-150 20' TYPE O 20' TYPE 0 6 5 21 EA5T-230 5' TYPE A 5' TYPE A 3 5 IQ 5OUTH-160 5' TYPE A 5' TYPE A 2 4 13 WE5T-2c10 5' TYPE A 5' TYPE A 3 6 24 REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE: AREA REQUIRED = 31-75 S.F. AREA PROVIDED = 5,G30 5F LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES 5CRUB5 GROUND COVER 5 11 53 315 S.F. PARKING REQUIRED: 32 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 3Q SPACES RESTAURANT 51 TE: EXISTIN6 ZONING = G-3 AND AG PROPOSED ZONING = G-3 L. U. D. = MIXED USE NET ACREAGE _ .q3b AG. (404-75.055 5F) BUILDING 5.F. = 3000 S.F. BUILDING TO 51TE GOVERAGE = -1-34% OPEN SPACE 5.F. = 6,928 5F OPEN SPACE TO 51TE = 11% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: REQUIRED BUFFER YARD: (5,016 5F PROVIDED) REQUIRED PROVIDED GANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES 5GRUB5 NORTH-70 20' TYPE 0 20' TYPE 0 3 3 10 EA5T-290 5' TYPE A 5` TYPE A 3 6 24 5 )TH-160 5' TYPE A 5' TYPE A .2 4 13 WE5T-240 10' TYPE B 10' TYPE B 5 8 25 NORTNWE5T-110 10' TYPE B 10' TYPE B 3 4 11 REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE: AREA REQUIRED = 1500 S.F. AREA PROVIDED: 6,653 5F LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES 5GRUB5 GROUND COVER 3 5 25 150 S.F. PARKING REQUIRED: 30 5PAGE5 PARKING PROVIDED: 43 SPACES VARIANCE RE62UE5T: TO PROVIDE DRIVE FROM 5OUTHLAKE BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN IN LIEU OF THE GURRENT REQUIREMENT THAT THE DRIVE BE 500 FT. FROM THE INTERSEGTION WITH KIMBALL ROAD. EAST ELEVATION OF RESTAURANT METAL GOPING t METAL CANOPY OIL 15'-0" A.F.F. + or - T.O. WALL - - - FACE BRICK GL A55 IN ALUM I NUM SCALE, 1 /8"=1'-O" RESTAURANT 4'-0" I FACE BRICK METAL COPING t'�- METAL CANOPY FACE BRICK GLA55 IN ALUMINUM - -- FRAME t =� ELEVATION OF RESTAURANT A KIMBALL ROAD (EAST SCALE: 1 /8"=1'-0' _ 23'-6" A.F.F. T.O. WALL 21'-6" A.F.F. T.O. WALL - METAL COPING FACE BRICK O'-0" FIN. ! 14 SOU THL AKE f3L VD. `SITE AREA �v �O 0* C VICINITY MAP NO SCALE =- METAL GOPING t METAL CANOPY SIGNAGE I ! r NHi il! t nR M,g'�N l ...�{li� , { V Ili: I� g �i�'19�1 "d YwH" + BRICK np 1 rlt anaru:t :ti u 1 a wrn.{ .Na{r� we uaNu:s leave tlNta n;tu rw.lm tulu:aa :uut uanf• a n'1111n:'91�xf l F I ;i' . , 1 :fxa il1M I'p. i ": N NflAINI I I I I i „,;µj�r� K.. vu crN;OLA55 IN ALUMINUM FRAME LIGHT FIXTURE Owner: Royal Properties 11300 N. Central Expwy. Suite 407 Dallas, Texas 75243 The Southlake Center at Kimball Southlake, Texas Tarrant County OCT 2 3 1995 Net Acreage: 1.84 AC Zoned C-3, Mixed -Use Designation ELEVATION OF RETAIL SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (NORTH) WEST ELEVATION OF RETAIL BUILDING (EAST SIMILAR) SCALE, I/8°=1'-O" SCALE: I/8"=1'-O" CASE NO. ZA 95—W4 This document. -hott- it nold coGY or rt' ;< •sodob;s tormvt.. �s cepyagRted and on imtrument of Amcaf in �t to the ➢tim" Id �-h 'It pe ��tHodgesAssociates SCHEME rhif document +s not A—ded or ovthorued 1r r.,,ee - bY any p" on este Wore or such project o• ony other a� anners T r pro ect. My reuse, �nclud{nq copying aM/or ..�,�ao..�wdnyMg � ,—y ha dx JrMM,-ilre)ut -AttM ppmveeion / '�1r i arVhi �.1�L �• drawn {file Meuciates tar tM specrk Purpose Inonded is a .nolat�on 1 M bw. Unouthnri,ed use o1 !hif��� iYr.'y' J.1.`74��SN efilde rney -exult in ..mil andthn cld us l of NOef. 13b42 Texs 7S2A4-4514o(214)387-1000 spi 98' RIGHT-OF-WAY 3 3 (MIN.) o 10' 24' VARIES 24' 10, 31 FUTURE ROADWAY SECTION 'A" KI RKWOOD BOULEVARD 1" = 10' 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY 11' 28' 11' I I SECTION 'B' RESIDENTIAL STREET 1" = 10' LEGEND U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT B.L. BUILDING LINE PROPOSED PARK, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS To BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. AND/(DR P.M.A. PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. AND/OR P.M.A. ri IRVF TORI F CURVE RADIUS DELTA TANGENT LENGTHI CHORD BEARING C1 250.00' 26'50'40" 59.66' 117.13' 116.06' N71*41'41"E C2 263.78' 10*52'37" 25.11' 50.08' 50.00' S89'26'40"E C3 534.25' 04'35'29" 21.42' 42.81' 42.80' S81'42'37"E C4 519.00' 09'35'45" 43.56' 86.92' 86.82' S74'�7'00"E C5 1522.00' 08*18'07" 110.46' 220.53' 220.34 S29'26'55"E C6 2033.00' 17'08'40" 306.45' 608.33' 597.12' S33'2'12"E C7 1022.00' 05'55'06" 52.83' 105.57' 105.52' S39'28'59"E I IMF TORI F LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N56'35'32" E 98.00' L2 S77'45'51" E 5.95' L3 N58' 16'21" E 22.36' L4 N23'42' 12" E 133.50' L5 N81'03'36" E 260.77' L6 N34'38'08"W 325.24' L7 N55' 16'40" E 42.75' L8 S24' 15'34" E 169.05' 1_9 N89'39'47"W 110.00, NOTES: 1. EXISTING ZONING: SOLANA RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. 2. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THIS TRACT ARE AS SPECIFIED IN THE SOLANA RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. FOF PRODUCT TYPE "A". 3. ALL STREETS ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO AND MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. 4. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED. 5. ALL AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE. AREA SUMMARY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 78.67% 43.26 ACRES RESIDENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY COMMON OPEN SPACE 2.73% 1.50 ACRES PARK DEDICATION 2.54% 1.40 ACRES NET ACREAGE 83.94% 46.16 ACRES MAJOR STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY 16.06% 8.83 ACRES GROSS ACREAGE 100% 54.99 ACRES SITE DATA GROSS ACREAGE 54.99 ACRES 70 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 37.80 ACRES COMMON OPEN SPACE 2.90 ACRES MINIMUM LOT SIZE 15,OoO S.F. AVERAGE LOT SIZE 23,6')4 S.F. DENSITY (DWELLING UNITS/ACRE) 1.27 ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONST RU(JION JANUARY, 1996 MAY, 1996 ANTICIPATED NUMBER OF GROSS NUMBER OF COMMON PERCENT PHASE COMPLETION ZONING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE RESIDENTIAL COMMON AREA OPEN DATE LOTS DENSITY AREAS ACREAGE SPACE (D.U./ACR=) 1 MARCH, PUD MIXED USE 70 54.99 0.78/AC 6 2.90 7.67 1996 480- I <�0�0 �af PROPOSED DENTON CREEK PRESSURE SYSTEM LIFT STATION BY T.R.A. AND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE (EXACT LOCATION TO BE MUTUALLY DETERMINED BY T.R.A., CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, AND MTP/►BM PHASE II & III JOINT VENTURE) OVERFLOW ESMT. TO U.S.A. C-206 VOL. 2793, PG. 55 - EASEMENT & R.O.W. TEXAS POWER & LIGHT TRACT 3 0.8 ACRES t VOL. 8078, PG. 2033 0 100 200 300 400 1 "=200' P LOCATION MAP N.T.S. OVERFI� T. \y'•. TO U.S.A.\,r VOL. 13, G. 0 \\ APPROX. CENTERLINE NORTH _ Q > WHITE CHAPEL BLVD. 0. �y DELTA = 39'32 06 ( RADIUS = 450.77 '� OS TANGENT = 162.00' POND LENGTH = 311.04' \ Q O CHORD = 304.91' D BRG = N57-49-58"E "� :; ��G PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FOR WIDENING DELTA = 38'05'34" - -7 r yd \ OF STREET (0.56 AC.) RADIUS = 455.64'' l n\ '::::. ' TANGENT = 157.301 I / �': LENGTH = 302.93' CHORD = 297.38' \ \ --1 / /\, Lio� PROPOSED PARK DEDICATION TO C D BRG = N18 4819E < _ _ ��J�. ::.: �`��• THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE (1.4 AC.) • •... ' ... � � � eye / �••'<��� �c\ ------ ---- --- ----- -- ---- - 'Ro �.yy�•'.• _ v < o � � / �\••���,� t� I' I PROP. /1 �y..., DELTA = 25'49'01'L RADIUS = 904.46 :�. TANGENT = 207.29' LENGTH = 407.54'_ CHORD = 404.11' �- - W -1 - I s�'9 \' �\ irk, yy y CHD BRG = NO3'59'40E r IWI L-J I �� ��► < / /�\ - m y I I PROP. 5•U.E. y I I i / A h - f \ • tl SWEET STREET 110. / 4zi STREET (P.IlvQ) . •� � � �� Na �� y .� i t I I I I I I I I �� � i I I J _ _ J L - FER LO -PROP. 5' U.E. P , \' ON� \� \.►�\ / m L - - (30; (0 -S fit. �\ y S89'14'52"W 1066.53 POND \ POINT OF BEGINNING / y \ PROP. = 08*16'06" ti Is = 2101.00; \ �` A,� / M L07 � TH = 303.819 POND \\� / / \ H- J 00 ` �� �� RD =. 302.93 F / / O �JV 2� It N29 25 55 W o 104 y� FUTURE SOUTHBOUND �s 0O m a o y �� KIRKWOOD BLVD. \ 00 ZL (n Ad 1 i y��\��`�� N89'49'48 W �i 199.41' ��tl� �JFFQ fQp �01 F � 0\ :rt DELTA = 36'57'08" `RADIUS = 1022.00' TANGENT = 341.48' LENGTH = 659.13' CHORD = 647.76' I DELTA = 33'59'40" CHD BRG = S18'02 52" E RADIUS = 1778.00' .6' TANGENT = 543.49' ? \\ <: ti LENGTH = 1054.91 1 % G CHORD = 1039.51 CHD BRG = N16'34'08"W �yq . LO APPROX. DOVE ROAD INEJ WEST G JO' ti• BI 1It � CV O N N O N ON Z DOME (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) (20' TRAVELED WAY) PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FOR WIDENING OF STREET (0.04 AC.) 84' PROPOSED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY POINT OF INGRESS/EGRESS 0 APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: CHAIRMAN OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SOLANA PHASE I OUT OF THE R.D. PRICE SURVEY, A-1207, AND THE J.B. MARTIN SURVEY, A-1134 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AUGUST 25, 1995 OWNER/DEVELOPER: MTP-IBM PHASE II & III JOINT VENTURE NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE SUITE 500 WESTLAKE, TEXAS 76262 (817) 430-0303 ENGINEER: BURY & PITTMAN, INC. 5310 HARVEST HILL DRIVE D L. . SUITE 100 DALLAS, TEXAS 75230 OCT 2 41995 (214) 991-0011 1 bII Bury+Pittman, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Surveyors Dallas, Texas Tel 214/991-0011 Fax 214/991-0278 e Copyright 1995 Bury & Pittman D.F.W., Inc. CASE NO. ZA95-92 3 10' 24' N wl 3I � FUTURE ROADWAY 98' RIGHT-OF-WAY (MIN.) VARIES SECTION 'A' KI RKWOOD BOULEVARD 1" = 10' 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY 11' 28' 11 I SECTION 'B' RESIDENTIAL ST RI ---ET 1" = 10' LEGEND UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT BUILDING LINE PROPOSED PARK, RECREATIC N, AND OPEN SPACE DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. AI`JD/OR P.M•A. PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. AND/(DR P.M.A. r"I iR\/F TART F CURVE RADIUS DELTA TANGENT LENGTH CHORD BEARING C1 250.00' 26'50'40" 59.66' 117.13' 116.06' N 71'41'41 "E C2 263.78' 10'52'37" 25.11' 50.08' 50.00' E89'26'40"E C3 534.25' 04'35'29" 21.42' 42.81' 42.80' S81'42'37"E C4 519.00' 09'35'45" 43.56' 86.92' 86.82' c-74'37'00"E C5 1522.00' 08.18'07" 110.46' 220.53' 220.34' 29'26'55"E C6 2033.00' 17'08'40" 306.45' 608.33' 597.12' 33.52" 2"E C7 1022.00' 05'55'06" 52.83' 105.57' 105.52' 39'28'59"E I INF TART F LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N56'35'32" E 98.00, L2 S77'45'51" E 5.95' L3 N58' 16'21" E 22.36' L4 N23'42' 12" E 133.50' L5 N81'03'36" E 260.77' L6 N34'38'08'W 325.24' L7 N55' 1 6'40" E 42.75' L8 S24' 15'34' E 169.05' L9 N89'39'47"W 110.00, NOTES: 1. EXISTING ZONING: SOLANA RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. 2. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THIS TRACT ARE AS SPECIFIED IN THE SOLANA RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. FOR PRODUCT TYPE "A' . 3. ALL STREETS ARE TO 3E DEDICATED TO AND MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. 4. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED. 5. ALL AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE. AREA SUMMARY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 78.67% 43.26 ACRES RESIDENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY COMMON OPEN SPACE 2.73% 1.50 ACRES PARK DEDICATION 2.54% 1.40 ACRES NET ACREAGE 83.94% 46.16 ACRES MAJOR STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY 16.06% E.83 ACRES GROSS ACREAGE 100% 54.99 ACRES SITE DATA GROSS ACREAGE 54.99 ACRES 70 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 3 i .80 ACRES COMMON OPEN SPACE 2.90 ACRES MINIMUM LOT SIZE 15,000 S.F. AVERAGE LOT SIZE 23,694 S.F. DENSITY (DWELLING UNITS/ACRE) 1.27 ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONST RUCTION JANUARY, 1996 MAY, 1996 C5 ozk: 24' 10, I� OAK*t^s. - .TRF.Fi.. - �21 OAK ;- 1" OAK C) 0 'T`S G' $ 1� , .7..` F. Q fi r sue' r-. OVERFT \ PROPOSED DENTON CREEK PRESSURE SYSTEM LIFT STATION BY T.R.A. AND CITY OF SOUTHLAKE (EXACT LOCATION TO BE MUTUALLY DETERMINED BY T.R.A., CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, AND MTP IBM PHASE II & III JOINT VENTURE OVERFLOW ESMT. TO U.S.A. C-206 VOL. 2793, PG. 55 - EASEMENT & R.O.W. TEXAS POWER & LIGHT TRACT 3 0.8 ACRES t VOL. 8078, PG. 2033 0 100 200 300 400 1 "=200' .'TREE TO U.S.A. �< { Q \ APPROX. CENTERLINE NORTH \\\ f?`PE 4 > ; WHITE CHAPEL BLVD. \� �� (' j V CO J I I CHICKEN = ''" WELL DELTA COOP 393206!\ \ O HOUSE ,` \* RADIUS = 450.77 - , 1 STORY G' <; TANGENT = 162.00' BRICK POND \`.� { 1`"ELM LENGTH = 311.04' i ti HOUSE O` 1..4'`L/ ,. ` MS .� � � H � ' ' : -', CHORD = 304.91r GARAG : _ � , `� ,� ':. '10 ,�'� t` r ''!_r' D BRG N5749 58 E PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE <, 14 ,� r 10702 '0 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FOR WIDENING �- "t53.75' s ` OF STREET 0.56 AC. _ DELTA $'05 34 , -y0 �•�: ( ) } 1 RADIU -�* 455.64' ,57 21 z zb TREE`�-.- _t ' r TANGENT-`= 157.30' 10 kp s LENGTH = 302.93: 0ti �- -j''?� PROPOSED PARK DEDICATION TO CHORD = 297.38 27 TRE` 14'4 C D BRG = N18'48'19"E ♦� g s �4 0 92_69' � -t oQ `� �° THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE (1.4 AC.) .-s p474. c.0 i. ids: 'y -, - / 1 P=OP. 0' U.6' 22 'p. `t\/ 14^n,.�3 R` •'l+[ %'. ✓ ' z �' ray 2 00/ y0 /✓� �` ,;yL '; 'r 6 �'- g '::: L - ", ) V \ ^' 14' 0. eb 2 # ♦6ti' o� :. �S\` - r $ m yr ,r 14 x•••' LOCATION MAP N.T.S. 'F) i Lt"f,: `t ♦ __ �_ PROP. �� / Vi4'F: IA n1 5h 1Q �� �i7 t Jry :4 `$ ..::. ` :,� _ _ NI ^. �s 5g. \° _ ♦0♦ oo� ::::. SO. ® Tt,AY `: s"_,at '- ' 1_... ✓✓ 1 0 `' 'r i ti `i'+ \ O al, ; 4"' ,-r I 141. 0 # i PROP. 15' h PROP1 1 6�' - t 5p _ p '� 'S' Ci �/ I �\ V. iT CLDAR y 1 (i 4 JA . n OOO"' 0. 6g l g9 9 % J \J \ -...r 2':�4.K5 9.39' i a D.E. N 0' p. y. ♦ °\' G \ i' OAKS s �\ - r " 0/ '7�' / �\ \f � i 5" �� �^.\ �O \ �A DELTA 25'49 01 w + e� �1°\ . /i RADIUS = 904.46' 41.3a I I� 6 / / 6 \ ♦� 17%' :::� �y��J TANGENT = 207.29 �Y I Im (PROP, 15' f " 12 LENGTH = 407.54' .(j4 D.E.1 146.29 m ♦ o CHORD = 404.11' O °\ \\ CHD BRG = NO3'59'40"E 4 . o I I 3a.1s IN I -ti 5 8 �` 3 �I I I n I N 'p O 6�3 CD PROP. g. ''' S 2.ax.�.,-1 $°� , •^ �\ \ ♦� n° :'�'� ':`\•' \ rn 2 / 1 I; .* \ - �'fi;.� t '.00 \ 8 -<\ \ •-�S ♦ `�`� -�.. Lp� 1�{�\�'' :\- ..� I �+ N \'w� - a0 ° Ws i :•::: SWEET STREET Y \ •\ L2 V* 6.05 0 /S OCK' �,'• ¢� �v `• ;N L3 _ 46' 1 .R �\ o ff:' S p 9 • l Ci1 C' IF / o° ou" • c w f� 1 'p � :::1. tip ll 196 9 2g o S �m 2 o / ♦`9 S t \ s * -- - --- - �J 1, 22 2 .r- C �` _3,q• B 1j6g0? `�' \h0, / J E. r�.:0 ?-i �.,;ff;F 16�6.35 10 r \ 16 . , \ •.ii\`'� 10"F( AA 0 1 " 17 q �': �v \--` = o\ / i.4S 5b a2. 23 / 6 ,18 123.42 38.2 ' �14i OAK 'er�" ` 1 � c STREET •B•_ 7� �4.a8' 65 � r3 61/� � J� O i s 7 > 18 / f .63. '05.74' 1:5.77r.: 5\- \19.87'' 2 i EInKS �! 3 / (^TYP.) N - 12 i"AK 42 ;� 6 -� 1�\� 19 / / / / 28 27 N 26 25 - 24 ^ �y n 0 29 ` _ C.L'� G PROP. 5' U.E. rj \ '`} \/ / 198.27• n S89'14 52"W 1066 53 r • - POND P � =�-,..- �� ti .4 POINT OF BEGINNING f 30 k = 08*16'060 o pb � � \ ) JS=2101.00 &3LOT 2 �, N --N T = 151. 86 POND `.�' ' \ gh \ .�sN ���'�� > ;TH = 303.19' \ o. ♦5' ;- \ 31 f RD =. 302.93' N29 25 55 W166.86, ♦p' ( Vim- �� C� 'J �,{� � T FUTURE SOUTHBOUN13 �. ':.. KiRKWOOD BLVD. \ � � � ;� o xl\ ' LG cn \� PROP. 5' U.E. mil. LOT 1 \l°33 a 14" Sii}, � ��',� r� 135.1 J y N89'49'48 W t � •. ;•,:,,=±�AN" 199.41 RC(s L)'ARC -- *)'F"OAK 4. IrTRFF r = \ _r" d' 25.83' ti I \\ 7 \ ` ` DELTA = 36'57'08" '�) I B C '`t RADIUS = 1022.00' f EaARS ` - WtLL HOUSE \' , TANGENT r LENGTH = = 341.48 659.13' CHORD = 647.76 -- DELTA = 33'59'40" CHID BRG = S18'02'52"E RADIUS = 1778.00''` I { TANGENT = 543.49' LENGTH CHORD = 1054.91' = 1039.51' CHD BRG = N16'34'08"W _ 1 4' 0AX TR. 12 APPROX. ROAD INEJ WEST 14'DAiC !?.�.tEicR'.! rn OAK 14'OAK IQFOAK - OAK 1 r I t Z to w � PROPOSED MGP�Th, *z-a- I�i4Y TO THEFw o ,n CITY 0 SOUTHF>KE''FE3iR WfING I `"j 18"OA w ;3 o OF STREET A)*. AC.) O N O �y r TR4Pt k` 7 t "rRi 7 ¢ 5 I O DOVE (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) (20' TRAVELED WAY) 84' PROPOSED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGAL DESC RIPTION LAND DESCRIPTION OF A 54.99 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, PARCEL OF LAND OUT OF THE J. B. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. A-1134 AND THE R. D. PRICE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. A-1207, SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO MTP-IBM PHASE II AND III JOINT VENTURE BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8995, PAGE 1268 IN THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, THE SAID 54.99 ACRE PARCEL IS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING, AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STANFORD PLACE ADDITION AS RECORDED IN PLAT VOLUME 388/128, PAGE 79 OF THE MAP RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; SAME CORNER BEING IN THE EAST LINE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED I.B.M. TRACT; THENCE, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID STANFORD PLACE ADDITION, S00'10'12"W, 706.40 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID STANFORD PLACE ADDITION; THENCE, ACROSS THE SAID I.B.M. TRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1) N89'49'48"W, 199.41 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS S53'28'347W; 2) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.13 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1022.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36*57'08", WHOSE CHORD BEARS S18'02'52"E, 647.76 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY. 3) S00'25'42"W, 593.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DOVE ROAD AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID I.B.M. TRACT; THENCE, ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DOVE ROAD, N89-39'47"W, 110.00 FEET; THENCE, ACROSS THE SAID I.B.M. TRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING TWENTY (20) COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1) N00'25'42" E, 230.36 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT; 2) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1054.91 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1778.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33'59'40", WHOSE CHORD BEARS N16'34'08"W, 1039.51 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; 3) N33'33'58" W, 481.33 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT; 4) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 303.19 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2101.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8'16'06", WHOSE CHORD BEARS N29'25'55"W, 302.93 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; 5) N25-17'52"W, 200.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT; 6) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 206.33 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1424.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8'18'07", WHOSE CHORD BEARS N29'26'55"W, 206.15 FEET TO A POINT; 7) N56-35'32" E, 98.00 FEET TO A POINT; 8) S77'45'51"E, 5.95 FEET TO A POINT; 9) N58-16'21"E, 22.36 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT; 10) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 117.13 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26'50'40", WHOSE CHORD BEARS N71'41'41"E, 116.06 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; 1 1) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 50.08 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 263.78 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10'52'37", WHOSE CHORD BEARS S89-26'40"E, 50.00 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; 12) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 42.81 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 534.25 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'35'29", WHOSE CHORD BEARS S81'42'37"E, 42.80 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; 13) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.92 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 519.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09'35'45", WHOSE CHORD BEARS S74'37'00"E, 86.86 FEET TO A POINT; 14) N23.42' 12" E, 133.50 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT; 15) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 407.54 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 904.46 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25'49'01", WHOSE CHORD BEARS NO3-59'40" E, 404.11 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 16) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 302.93 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 455.64 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38'05'34", WHOSE CHORD BEARS N18'48'19"E, 297.38 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; 17) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 311.04 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 450.77 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39'32'06", WHOSE CHORD BEARS N5T49'58"E, 304.91 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; 18) N81'03'36"E, 260.77 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; 19) N34-38'08"W, 325.24 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; 20) N55' 16'40" E, 42.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WHITE CHAPEL ROAD AND THE EAST LINE OF THE SAID I.B.M. TRACT. THENCE, ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID WHITE CHAPEL ROAD THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1) S34'36'31" E, 1502.14 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; 2) S34'53' 17" E, 374.48 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; 3) S24-15'34'E, 169.05 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID STANFORD PLACE ADDITION; THENCE, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID STANFORD PLACE ADDITION S89'14'52"W, 1066.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 54.99 ACRES MORE OR LESS OF LAND AREA. PRELIMINARY PLAT SOLANA PHASE I BEING 54.99 ACRES/72 LOTS OUT OF THE R.D. PRICE SURVEY, A-1207, AND THE J.B. MARTIN SURVEY, A-1134 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AUGUST 25, 1995 OWNER/DEVELOPER: MTP -IBM PHASE II & III JOINT VENTURE NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE SUITE 500 WESTLAKE, TEXAS 76262 (817) 430-0303 ENGINEER: BURY & PITTMAN, INC. 5310 HARVEST HILL DRIVE SUITE 100 DALLAS, TEXAS 75230 (214) 991-0011 O OCT 2 41995 Bury+Pittman, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Surveyors Dallas, Texas Tel 214/991-0011 Fax 214/991-0278 �c Cnnvrioht 1995 Rury & Pittman D.F.W.. Inc. CASE NO. ZA95-93 Fill', ► �....•.•.•.' \� ..'..'....' EXISTING SHOWROOM / -.... . ! RICK STACY b, - - - - I RANDY PACK I / F. F. = 676.02 :.� ZONING 1-1 O.H. DO OR LUD IND. . . . . . , 15' 811t11L01 z z W W :::::1:::::: NE + EXIT : : LINE 4 8L. 8 + W W iNn..... .•.•I ► CO CRETE PAVING n / /fLn 0 0 /-__ ::: .. _ o P, O POSED 30,000 SQ. s' t e' 27 I s ► a- `� F WAREHOUSE ___ ..:.::::::...:.:.:. I *�6A-EXISTING 59,500 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE •7AIST.FL00R30000SQ.FT. f + O H. DOOR / / 1 ::::.::!:: ::: ::: :•: o i a, ►► -- - 6.02 25'/ - - -rI - '' ........... . EXIT @ ....I cnLLJ , % U �. ! PROPOSED MEZZANINE, ONE FLOOR ONLY .: ;I "' ► --- - �'� 15,000 S.F. t ....':�: : .;r to 0 i / / *7-8 2ND.. FLOOR i - -wuja EXISTING SHOWROOM i t- ' A x - o 124'FIRELANf _ u 4-200 SO. FT. PER STORY 1' ' *2-A 1 ST. FLOOR / + _ Lr) *2-8 2ND. FLOOR \ 24'FIRELANE wJ. U 6 0' 0' ... ... j -- 6 .i. . o .... 1 a F.F. = 676.02 / I . a . ! 15'BUILDIN ' -- - -- -- - *' cn .: _it x , FXIT I / :1: - :_LINE i 1 RICK STACY & RANDY PACK 20NING 1-1 LUD MIXED I LOT- 3 SK. -8 H.C. 1. LDcl- , Q 1 �/X0 EX STING / o :::i3 co .EXISTING 604 SQ FT. i _ 6,000 SQ. FT. OFFICE OFFICE �5 H.C. fz 12' cr 1 + oar / 3,000 SQ. FT. 1ST PER / Uj > ; I i ram` STORY / /� ;I; : " j o �1...._.: -w o *1-A 1ST.FL00R ,COMPLET BUILDING TO SE 100% CONCRETE PANELS T MEET MASSORY REQ. EXIT p .:::;:::j;:;.:.: a} 1�.. r " •2-6 2ND. FLOOR / .... ... 1 .. i I - a - // 238.0'/ i EXIT ►,, .'..:... n F. F. = 676.02 .EXI WCOVEREDENT �' . . t .'.. m ,�/f� In ows NEW5'SIDEWALK t6' . NEWS'SIDEWALK O.H.D. COVERED COVERED r 1 O.H.D. - EXIT I----__ �, EX IS INU I ' ! EXISTING - DOCKS EX(T ...�. a I' 5'0'I EXIT c 62?0 1 DOCKS : :/: : : in H.C. IIGH ING ` LIGHTING i _ LIGHTING---�.:. ' �-► i i I I.. .NCLOSEDTR SH I 0 1. I I 1 - 5'SIDEWALK i / I i I 49' 18.0' 1 42.0' .. ...... PCAcN 9 SPACES C� 9' X 8' --1 -E---1 3 S ACES _ SPACES 10'X 2 DUMPSTERS _ ; 1 9' X 18' _ 1 O.H.D.:r t rl i/C = 6 7.61 • ; .. :t : 24' R / H.C. I I ~ , i I - - - 20-0' 1 BO' 0' -__ -20.�_ __ ' .. �•� Jl I IIIIII _ _� ,. TIC- 7'..3�: - TIC-675.52 _ ---- -_� �: ►:;DEVIATIONS: H.C. RAMP �. t. - O.H.D. 1 �. . . . .. . . . . . . `. O.H.D. :T: 1 1. DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE THROATLENGHTS. l'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-------- - �. t :► f a .'. .'. .'. ... ...... .. o ; PROPOSED 6 , 560 S C� 2. PARTIAL BUFFERYARD AL0 NG SOUTH, AND NO ►. I. r.. . .,�y:� 24'FIRELANE . ........... ----- v ► .i �1:., BUFFERrARD WITH F T. W A R E H O U S E -:x I H 6 CHAIN LINK FENCE ALONG THE 1. 48' R v . . . . . . . I - ------ 1 . . . . . . . t. . . r� . . . . .'. . .'. . . . . . . . o - . 1 I . : �. ............. .... .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . _ ('. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - O .H.D. - o : ,, 1 ,•. .•. �•. 1 .'. .'. .'.'.'. .'. .. .'. . . . . . �1y1. �. cn �, G.H.C. i WEST DUE TO EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. o.,. .............. .... 1`................ ..... ........ u'-----..__ co ♦_ � , c, 8 A IST.FLOOR ui •.•.•.•:�:- •. .. i 3.REDUCTIONOFINTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED . . . 1 F- •8-B 2ND. FLOOR -------- Q . . . , • r : : : ---- a + 4 j j .TRASH DUMPSTER LOCATION. u 1 H.C. H.C. j o iLu v . . i •� 1 14 S PAC E E 9' X 18' 3d_ :. . . . . . . . . �, ! O.H.D. � . . .. . . / . , 5. REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES. m ►��::: i:• ...! 13 SPACES 0 9' x 18' �:: m i O.H.D. , ..: XA I 10, J. ------ ---------- - r . t o I i I I I I / / ( 1 0 R C.r+.D. EXTERIOR . . . , a r .�-. •. H.C. N.C. m 1 4 S P A C E S 9' x 18' ( } O.H.D. LIGHTING o y' 13 SPACES 0 9' x 18' .... , -� o m , NORTH � /AI I 6 N-EW S' SIDE -WALK. .�. I' T. o . 6� �\ _ ...'..'.'. . ... ..'. . . . :.. . . . . : :: . . . . . NEW PAVING POINT TO POINT .... . :: 1 622.00 � 'I 1... 600 _:T-_! CONCRETE PAVING o :1 / t T t '�• �'; CONCRETE PAVING ., - ,_ .. .. .. .•. .�. �. f :•: : :.:: �� o E�qo CONCRETE PAVING 1 84-R -;. . . .: . . . :: :.:.: :. :.:...:.::.:. :::.:....:..:....:.:.:.:'. 24'FiRELANE :'.-�.: .:. :.. ..' ... •.. .. :.;i 40 p : 0 10 2 0 �, . . ...:. . . ....... . ..4.0' : :' 8.0' !..': ; 189.0' 1 SCALE: 1'=20' 30' BUILDING LINE :.. .': .�, , -� Ti = 61 .3 _- T!C = 676.10 _ _ .. .. ........ .. ............... I I ,, .... j ` � -�-- 1 1 OWNER: RICK STACEY .:..:::::::: I I l I I PROPOSED i 1000 WEST SOUTHLAKE BLVD. I / I �\ I ( / + t I t I'' i r. -- EXISTING ENTRANCE _. 12 SPACES C� 9' X 18' >- 31.0'ENTRANCE I 14 SPACES Ca 9' z 118 : SOUTLAKE, TEXAS 76092 i 13 SPACES 0 9' x 18 �y - I _ EXISTI G + •I•. ::1QC' , .► �� :: , PROPOSEO 20' M I 1 .. FLAG. I ! LIGHT STANDARD 28.0 ENT ANCE t .� I . T/C = 73.27 .: :. .:.: ` TIC = 77.27 : P I ..................... I ; RE PARED BY: B. C. 1. .......................... .... ► r ...too ........................... P.O. 171886 . N t _. __- .P LE ��!. . . FLAG' . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76003 - - -- -- -- - - - S : . ... . .. . ... .. .... . 1 - _�:�------------------------ S i ate•- - __ -_ �- - - -.- -.- _ _ -�' �� _ _- -- - -- __ -_ -_ - -- -_ J- . - ) 2 M ........................... 01 ..... ...... _ _ ----- - -- GRASS MEDIAN_ S 29' 28' E _ _--_ _ GRASS MEDIAN _ GRASS MEDIAN 7 TIC : 672.18 -tO'-R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ._ ...'. . . . . .TIC - 67d.35J o 3 0 i(TY P. ALL ENTRANCES - ,r ' i I.D. AND O.D.) CASE # Z A 9 5- 7 7 Ln Cr \� S 0 1 5 8' 00 57' *-' L = 6.3 1 i� i i 10' E 25'------------------------------------------291_ 0' TO NEXTFtRE HYD. RICK STACY & RANDY PACK LOT-3 BK.-A ZONING 1-1 LUD MIXED C0MMLERCE S T R E- E T - - RICK STACY & RANDYPACK ZONING 1-1 LUD MIXED LOT-2 BK.-A -,� OCT 241995 L�Iavil REVISIONS SITE PLAN DESCRIP. DT STACY FURNITURE WAREHOUSE OMMERCE BUSINESS PARK, LOT 2 BLOCK 8 ---- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DWN _ CWC DATE 12123194 SCALE: 1'=20' CHKD ---JDATE a' 0 a)W ,n W o GREENWAY INVESTMENTS ' , ' ' DAIN V. M' TISE I I 1 ' 1 ' ` J�HN R EZELL AND WIFE' I I 1 MARY EVELYN ZEMBROD I o I VOLUME 11557. PAGE 810, D.R.T.C.T. r ' VOLUME 7509, PAGE 419, D R.T.C.T., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , ' + 1 , , , , SALLY N. ,EZELL HOW�RD CARR VOLUME 3926, PAGE 504, D.R.T.C.T. `- L.U.D.: MIXED USE I , L.0 D.: MIXED USE , , , , I VOLUME% 7651, PAGE, 664, D.R. C.T..311 S. KIMBALL AVE L.U.D.: MIXED USE a- I ZONED: B1 t I ZONED: AG 0 + , ZONED:, Bt , 1 , , , , UU.Q.: `LOW DENSITY RESIDEN IAL , ,II d ' I , + + I I I I I ' ' , ' ZONED: AG , +� 4 I I 1 P. d,. B. S 89'58'41 "E 590.18' S 8P'41'38"E 72 .0�' .. p 0� 1 ` I 183.58' — — — 254- 4b — — 214.01_ 214.01' ' ' `I \, I w — — —10 — — 15` Dom'. E- /' — ; — — — ,-T5' r..1 et- -I (-' — — r -�14 81'� -. +--. , a !: ' — � -21 ZA7--19�`�.ttE. 5� � ` 20' D.U.E. CD 30' U.E. , 15' E. / 1 " 1 • `, ' ' ' i 1 64.25' T— E. 29 l0 19 < / r 18 -o 7 'J 15/ �"E+ 1, 1 6 p p `� LOT 20 \\ o Q 26,569 S. F. - .0 J N 20,228 S'F. O'� - LOT 1 I , , 0. I- , g1,173 S.F. ��' r, Q1,546 S.Fv I �� 4p 1 20,369 S.F. , o ' M.A. SCHROETKE ``' ` IT ` - ro O' ' ANDRFW L. JAMBS, JR \ • �� ` I j ~' `SO 15' U.U.E. L —'1 � D.SL p• , L_ — 1� D-LE _ 11 15' �U-L 305 S. KIMBALL �t4VE ET UX MARTHA T. \ o , ,Q — 5' — — — Ei ,4 -J5:1.4- — � ' , 211 EASTWOOD OR.\1 `I\Io _ T -7643`- �6fi D8 ►_ ,'- rn R T67�D ' 1 / o , -5 89'S8'a 1 -E r, — T6 4 9 5 0 ' o ' ' i °° I` °° '20 '�' g o H 1 "' LOT, 35, BLOCK, 2 30' 28 �I I 00 t 17 '� 016 F ' \^ 1 5 0 COMMON AREA TO BE 43,971 �.F. W o In w - 20, S. ., n .r - r OWNED &MAINTAINED 26,569 S.F. w . v rn , ' _ _ - c p o 20,171 S.F. { _ 2l�,662 S�. ao U , U (,N , + BY HOME" OWNERS ASOC. N I 21,498 S.F. oI { _ _ I , ' + , (n o 0 o I , , o0 8T42'04" W �'' , 9-42'0,4 --t- 11 �I i; 1 Q o °° o 5 89'42, 04" W, N 89'42'04"' E o, z 0 0 227.78' ' 1 .00 1� 1 .00 r 192.00' �; T / co' I , ' I ' r I / , N Z �, LOT 19R ' �' `b 0' 0 m ' 121 `�' ' iv , g , :r 4 ' 1 89 CARLOS DORRIS 25' 25' '' 27 {� ' ' ' 66 X °a 16 ^ET UXcKAREN W. I I 157.�0' o, 20;000 S.r7, /o Q1I,' o ¢ a r 2 /- I 20,000 S. 1 26,569 S.F. I 20, 00 S.F �I Q.000 �.F. , 13 EASTWOOD DR • ( / ,/ ' U 189.00 + ' I 189.00 r 1 N 89'42' LOTI 2 11 219.'?7' / , 18 .00 / I I, ' 6L0CK 2 3 , ' 192.004r E 0 TERESA JANL TNOMPSON IN BLOGNK 2 N '� ' 'cJ ' / ltj ' / N r' r 395 S. KIMBALL AVE ' ! / -j 00 _ I 1 , ' 00 N J ' ' i (ui ' / ,ri ' 32 0 r- '00 ' 15 ' e , , / m o U) 1 ' 00 00o I , 31 ' p .o •O C° ' ,� o,' 20,�00 S.F. ,� 0 r` ' f ' ' 20,Q�00 F. ,`�i m 20,000 S.F. r o� O iCi 26, ,� I z I 20,OOq' S.F. + '� / m n -n I IP 4s 969 S.F., r� O / ' r , / 2' /o +'� + =1 I cJ { +' o 26,56�' S.F. / , S. 89'42'04"' W ' S Sg'4� D4" W N 9: 4" 1 1 b r ' 18- 0 N 89' 2'04" E' r I 189.100, z ' 192 00' z r' z r� I m 189.00 , '� S '58 41" ' IN ' r N ' _ , , ' ' � r 1 111 ' 00 2 I 1198 15' r ' 231 °a r 00 ' m ' 14 '• ap r , , r� 0, _ O 0 LOT 18R , ' ' , rn I I I� 20,OOQ S.F. I - ' p' �n 2A,000 S1F. 'I ' 20,000 S.F. I 20,000 S.F. U.1 /' 7 LARRY L. & AVA FAUGHN 215 EASTWOOID DR L_ �15' D.U'.E— — 25 , 1 , ' I r '`' ' , TI I r' ' Y89 00' 0' RO 192.00' 3 ' GERALD W.TTHOMPS9f 1 I r { { , 18J.00' 1 0' 0 I 1 25' 25' o ' 405 S. KIMBALL A.VE 1 ' ' N, 89-S8' T' W o 26,289 S.F. , , t 189.00' W- , ' I '' , 190.42,1 0 , � I r , 25' 25' t , I � , I ' 24 "t 13 - 6p 'I r I I i� 1 20,000 S.F. '6 20 , O , / ``j ' o�oi ' ' 00 �0,790 S.F. I o -t , 82. & 2Q933 S.F. 20,000 S. . o o a Ipp r , 27��i I {�, ' ui L12O' ' '20' B L.N 6'45'56" W ? ' , 0 t 0i / r —r— �ab ,0 6.62 _2,.45. I11,, B.L.1 , I F ' 95.20' / , 192.00' t 1 I 4 32 I' 143 t34' 46.6'' 189 00' , 95. 0' 3 r 6 t3 J r= Q T— 2,4$6 S.F. o ' ' t ' I in 45.Q6' Z 0 �� 61.93' , t� AMHURST DRIVE 89;42'o w � 1 I C_ rS �" S 89'42'04" W d '' 00 `O I ` gS 1 1 , 71'.62' r ' 1 o in W o , 2 1� 8` , 4�8 00, N 217%.00' 25 CO' _ J S � w + I ' `* ' 1 01 9. L ,� 143. 21 ' ' 1 9 00 ' 1 1 .00 1, A c� , ' ' ct1 `r ' 4 .80' ► r I , 192.00' , Y Q W 0 r V) i I 00 ' 21 I i— , 1 + x a— LOT 1 R ' '� + r a + x�$r R ' 1 i •, r \ 1 _ ~ ' �; 28,238 S.F. ' T BE RE o , N 20' B.L N `` N 20' 6.4. LOT 4 U 0 0- N � I o I + , I , a0 , 1 ao ` 1 , ao 1 i r ' , �- w > CARL JOHNSON O z Z W GARY THAYER L —1 D.U.E. , , 11 , 1 0 z m Q �i o 2 ET UX JOAN P. o , ' EXISTING BARN F , 20 N r U-) , , ` o , 20,000 5'�F of 0 0 ET UX MARILYN G N 3 NN 217 EASTWOOD DR 0 I � I— 1 40' T 0 10 BE REMIOVED , 20,649' S.F. 20,OID0 S.F. o �I { 20,000 S.F. w \ 495 S KIMBALL AVE 0. 0� of 1 x I ' , 9 89-42'Op" W 0 r\ N 89*42'04"1 E bb 5 89'4e'04" W` �Io N`89'42'04'�E o; 1 00 ' = 18900, 192.00 ' o w , I > 20'5.14' I I , 189.13 O I 91 cv , o -� --- I 133 & 1 1 I o I , 1 L o ` J J ' 'I 43,967 S.F. , p I ,�' , I r 19 U) 1 BLIOCx 1j x I I 9 m o � 2 \ _ N 1 1 N N w O,CJ , N \ \ d 1 I I ) , CO I CO f 00 1 \ 00 N I , W a, ri 20,011.F. J ,ri Iri , InIul V- ui \ , \ 12 ` "' 0 o 20,006\ S.F. o ' N a,{� ' o W M J 28,621` S.F. I� ` m o 0 1 _ I 20,0'00 S.F. \ ` o , VI,, rn 20-ul,000 S.F Jci o v,.� m "� '0' ' '25' 25'LOT 25, BLOCK 1 LOT 16R, �+ 1i , COMMON AREA TO BE Q I 1 9.08 5' 25 18'9.GO 0 189.00 , , 192.00'OWNED &MAINTAINED GEORGE TUT,TLE I , , , + , _J oET UX CORRINE C9 ' ' 1 ' cn + rri BYHOME OWNERS ASSOC. 219 EASTWOOD DR I ' ' N \ �� c, I,,, ` 8 iv 'D r3203.9$' ao , 13 ` �I I ` 0Ma b20,0 0 S.F.LOT 5 c BLOCK 1 , o o w 2Q,000 S.F` 20,000 S.F.,-15' D.ID.E.— ry' SI I- 20,004 S.F. �, I +1JERRY FORBUS ' ' I 0° , ,' �I U , N 89'42 4 EET UX MARY '23 89'42'04" W N 89'4� 04" E\ S 59'42'04" 1W,,, ' o 192.OQ59,5,S. KIMBALL AVE 183.92' n - 28,622 S.F,. or 189.01 1' a 1 1 \ 1 0 , 3.24'Z ` 48.2 'm CO, r7 ,00 m 00 1 \ r , \ ' I r I�� 17 Ia 7 4 f \ BLOCK 2 0 196.08' x 1 r I r 0 20,308 S.F. ` 20\017 S F. ,jR�1 \ LOT 5R I `� 23. 2' ,rya LID 20,117 SF, ` o p,716 S.F: , �� JOHN A., LOGAN I ao -' 0 c I I , L. C0 , Q o I N o 43,968 S.F. - "'' ET UX S�1SAN B. Q raj I 0 , ' I I y g0 164.28' 1 17t 221 EASTOOOD DO V N 34 cD I o 24 164.17', ' ;� / `� I 16 fftJ.E- r I ' 'SO �` P 28,623 S.F. f '16 0`O / 15 I ^ r ' 49 cod o ` ' LOT 6 / W , / �, a, / 6 1 5 o 'DARRELL G. FAGLIE -�' �� j 20,118, S.F. ,' 15 , U \ o �. Q' S05 S. KIMBALL AVE 0 1 ' I Io 20, 309 S.F. - - 20, 550 I S. F. 1 21,050 S.F. o , - 15 U.E. o r ^ — — 0 — — 15'- U_E — — — — J — , -? 15 D�U E I__ 15' Il1J.� — o I '-T92-55L 15-D14.E-J L — — ' N , 2� 0 - �14�1 _ `— 214 O 1'- , 17.O1 5' 192.86' 89'13'21 "W - 13t9.4 Z \ \� J' In DENNIS MINDER, Q Z ; N. j O ET UX PATTIE, r 'J r ,' , ` .w n I ` 223 EASTWOOD DR ' _ LLT C� O .'JACK SAUUORS PETTY am ; \ �� Z LOT 7 VOLUME 6364, PAGE 431, D.R.T.C.T. I Q � _�' Q U GARY A. FOX r I,.U.D.: LOW Df`NSITY RESIOENTAL m I Y I Q �S 605 S. k"IMBALL AVE 'ZONED. AG Z < J / (D ;:D: 3N �j :ON; Cam ro ro V) CENTERLINE CURVE DATA NO DELTA RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD C'-1 17'52'59" 738.79' 116.24' 230.59' N 81'21'26" W 229.66' C-2 14'20'59" 400.00' 50.35' 100.13' N 79'35'26" W 99.92' C-3 07'05'45" 2000.00' 124.00' 247.69' S 00'01'41" W 247.53' C-4 14*14'10" 800.00' 99.90' 198.77' N 03'32'32" W 198.26' C-5 10*40'56" 800-00' 74.79' 149.15' N 05*19'09" W 148.93' C-6 02'44'33" 1000.00' 23.94' 47,87' S 02'08'55" E 47.86' LAND USE SCHEDULE EXISTING LAND USE - AGRICULTURAL PROPOSED LAND USE - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING ZONING - SF20A PROPOSED ZONING - N/A TOTAL LOTS - 58 RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS - 58 COMMON AREAS - 2 TOTAL AREA - 37.416 AC. DENSITY - 1.55 LOTS/ACRE NET ACREAGE - 37,230 MINIMUM LOT AREA - 20,000 S.F. MAXIMUM LOT AREA - 43,971 S.F. AVERAGE LOT AREA - 23,384 S.F. J J u SOUTHLAKE BLVD J m y �Z - RENWAY IJ — — 0 0 ITE S m N a W J J RAINBOW Li Q V) N a CONTINENTAL BLVD. o J E � s o J f- v zo_Z Oao > a; v, pr7W V, Ln �Q� V) Y W W 0 CA two J APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: CHAIRMAN: P & Z SECRETARY: APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: CHAIRMAN: P do Z SECRETARY: X< N 0 50' 100' 200' 300' SCALE IN FEET 1 " = 100' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BEING all that certain tract, parcel, or lot of land located in the JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, Abstract No. 529, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all those certain tracts of land described to Michael Jacobs in Volume 7180. Page 2351, D.R.T.C.T., described to E.R.O. Development Co., Inc.in Volume 11823, Page 1257, D.R.T.C.T., described to Dwain Petty in Volume 4410, Page 86, D.R.T.C.T., and described to Dwain Milford Petty and wife, Majorie F. Petty in Volume 4113, Page 282, D.R.T.C.T., and more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Meadow Oaks Subdivision, Vol. 388-129, Pg. 39, P.R.T C.T., THENCE N 00'00'38" W 37.77 feet; THENCE S 89'59'22" W 43.88 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING at a 3/8" steel rod found in the west right-of-way line of South Kimball Avenue for the northeast corner of the herein described tract some being the southeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to John R. Ezell and wife Sally N. Ezell in Volume 7651, Page 864. D.R.T.C.T; THENCE S 00'26'46" E, 399.81 feet along said right-of-way to a 5/8" steel rod found; THENCE S 00'22'12" E, along said right-of-way at 182.69 feet passing a 1/2" steel rod with a plastic cap stomped "MOAK SURV, INC." set, in all 489.67 feet to a 3/8" steel rod found; THENCE S 00'01'05" E, 333.96 feet along said right-of-way to a 1/2" steel rod with a Plastic cap stomped "MOAK SURV, INC " set for the southeast corner of the herein described tract some being the northeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to Jack Souders Petty in Volume 6364, Page 431, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE S 89-13'21" W, 1319.44 feet to a 1/4" steel rod found in the east line of Woodland Heights Addition as described in Volume 388-212, Page 56, P.R. T.C. T ; THENCE N 00'07'00" W, 463.71 feet along said east line to a 3/8" steel rod found; THENCE N 00'22'49" W, along the aforesaid east line at 190.77 feet passing a 1/2" steel rod with a plastic cap stomped "MOAK SURV, INC." set, in all 781.75 feet to a 1/2" steel rod found some being the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Greenway Investments, Volume 11557, Page 810, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE S 89'58'41" E, 590.18 feet along the south line of said Greenway Investment tract to a 5/8" steel rod found some being the southeast corner of the aforesaid Greenway Investment tract and the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Dan V. Matise in Volume 7609, Page 419, DR T.C.T.; THENCE S 89'41'38" E, 728.90 feet along the south line of said Matise tract to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 37.416 Acres (1,629,863 square feet) of land, more or less. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES A 37.416 ACRE TRACT 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 2 COMMON AREA S ZONED: SF2OA IN THE CITY OF SO UTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXA S DEVELOPER/OPTION HOLDER BRISCOE CLARK COMPANY 8300 DOUGLAS AVENUE SUITE 800, PRESTON PLAZA TOWER DALLAS, TEXAS 75225 (214) 706-9190 CURRENT OWNERS MIKE & GINGER JACOBS E.R.O. DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. 15851 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 740 1309 E GRAUWYLER DALLAS, TEXAS 75248 IRVING, TEXAS 75061 PREPARED BY. WASHINGTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 500 GRAPEVINE HWY. SUITE 375 HURST, TEXAS 66054 (817) 485-0707 METRO 498-3077 DWAIN PETTY 610 S. KIMBALL ROAD SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 SURVEYOR: DAVID C. MOAK SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYORS P.O. BOX 1034 HURST, TEXAS 76053 (817) 268-2211 NOVEMBER 13, 1995 JOB NO. 208-001 D FILE NAME: PPLTIH DEC 0 1995 CASE NO. ZA 95 -1 13 LAND USE DATA NO. DWELL. NET RES GROSS UNITS DENSITY ACREAGE SINGLE 6 0.37 du/ac 16.6 FAMILY J.D. JONES V. 351, P. 596 D.R.,T.Co.,Tx. \ 1 3/4" I.P.F 0.65' S. OF P.L N 89-27'50"E 322.70' BROKEN MON. 10' U.E. MJI � a a a (g Ct�S 0 0�2 a Q' A �s d I � I � LOT f Area = 3.876 Acres T 1 /2" I.P.F. LOT 6 5/8" I.P F. 0.33' W. OF P L. w- /0 ......{ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA o w V. 2378, Pg. 567 :D D.R.T.Ca., Tx. , ANGLE IRON L I LAKE GPAPEVINE 572 FLOWAGE LOT 5 AG 3 ..-'EASEMENT s Z i NOTE: ENTIRE TRACT IS TREE COVERED. I \ �5/1 I P.F. � Obi I ' • K srrtir E C.O.E. MON C O.E. MON N 89'22'01 "E 499.73' C-231-3 a C-231 1 196.' 1 �0' _ = ' 0 __1IL -J \ ANGLE IRON `n I � � - 00 r w i � a o� I LOT a LOT 4 Area = 2.508 Acres Area = 2.935 Acres r li N . "S 9 � � " ill 15/8" I.P.F., C. r ; am w Q 0 Y 0 x S 0� QQ_~ 3 s9's4 ,55 w o U� rn 572 FLOWAGE 60�� SB �...... o O r� I- � ••EASEMENT S � / I � m re) 'o �` LOT 1 C � Q z w Q o 00 / _ 00 r�l Z LOT 3 I > Area = 2.518 Acres`.'�' 08 I 1 /2" I.P.F L-• V N �� w -—HARBOR CT. LL X Z - -- --x C. 5 N a�•p�'23" E w s :.. cn a - a- 510.66' 0' w o Q (� �. 5/8" I.P.F 06 U af Q 1 U CA w BLOO C p Q 40 n {� Z' J (DL��©CK LI I w 1 I....... o I LOT 2 o� Area = 2.567 Acres k�' ��� N II L01 4 o m LOT 1 o 'I Area = 1.972 Acres II +1 3 I [P. 0 o 0 0 \ o I 1 5/8" I.P.F Q, 0 3/8" I.P F. 10' U.E. I 10' �. "> 0 1.9' N. OF P, L. I I JO r(hi Hi CIXIOL D)RIE,98 SUIRWIEV ?_00.00'--- �--- - - _ - d °AWES L. C�(�Ob(�f�� �URWE�I S 89'10'58'W ,620.77' 3/8" 1. P. P.L I d 10' U.E \ 10' U.E. I I I \ LOT 18 BLOCK P ► LOT 17 LOT 16 LCT 15 LOT 19 \ - ' QUAIL CREEK ESTATES I I I ` V.388-1 18, Pg. 92 \ P.R.T.Co, Tx. \ ZONED: SF-1 A l ct N pRe�R BURNEY LANE LONESOME DOVE ESTATES a a f o A o TAYLOR ST. w o Q N CARROLL u z M.S. z EMERALD CR J DOVE STREET LOC1700H HAP DESCRIPTION FOR A 16.63 ACRE TRACT Qrigrnol kale 7 " = 100' 0 1 50 100 200 Graphic Scale in Feet Being a 16.63 acre tract of land located in the R.D. Price Survey 1207, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being the tract of land in the name of Peggy H. Denton, as recorded in Volume 10366, Page 2208, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, (D.R.T.Co.jx.), and being more particularly descrived by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8" iron pin set at the southwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, Harbor Oaks, an addition to the city of Southlake, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-1 35, Page 1 1 , Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, (P.R.T.Co.Tx.). and also being in the north line of Lot 16, Block A, Quail Creek Estates, an addition to the city of Southlake, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-1 18, Page 92, P.R.T.Co.,Tx. Said 5/8" iron pin is the most easterly southeast corner of said Price Survey, the most westerly southwest corner of the John Childress Survey 254, and in the north line of the J.L. Chivers Survey 348, all in Tarrand County, Texas. THENCE South 89 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds West with the south line of said Denton tract, departing with the north line of Quail Creek Estates, 620.77 feet to a Corps of Engineers concrete monument with brass plate (all monuments hereafter are so marked) stamped C231 -5, being the most easterly southeast corner of a tract of land conveyed by deed to the United States of America, recorded in Volume 2378, Page 567, D.R.T.Co.,Tx., THENCE along the easterly line of said United' States of America Tract (Lake Grapevine), and the westerly line of said Denton Tract the following courses and distances: N 00 degrees 39 minutes 49 seconds W, at 4.05 feet past the north line of Quail Creek Estates and continuing in all 939.77 feet to Monument No. C231 -4, N 89 degrees 22 minutes 01 second E, 499.73 feet to Monument No. C213-3, N 18 degrees 13 minutes 56 seconds W, 673.30 feet to Monument No. C213-2 (monument broken) for the northwest corner of said Denton Tract, THENCE N 89 degrees 27 minutes 50 seconds E, 322.70 feet to a 3/8" iron pin found for the northeast corner of said Denton tract and in the west line of said John Childress Survey and said Harbor Oaks, THENCE S 00 degrees 43 minutes 30 seconds E with the west line of said John Childress Survey and said Harbor Oaks 1579.40 feet to the PnInt of Beginning and containing some 16.63 acres or 724,354.73 square feet. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS: I.J. e. LE\/1 TT ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 726 COMMERCE STREET SUITE 104 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 488-3313 DEVELOPER: TOM MATTHEWS P.O. BOX 92988 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 OWNER. PEGGY DENTON 10264 CODY OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS 66214 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT HUSH' HOMEPLACE an addition to the city of SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE R.D. PRICE SURVEY A -- 1207 16.63 ACRES 6 LOTS PRESENT ZONING SF-lA 12 DECEMBER 1995 UU EC 121995 �y5-ll� HUSE-PRL.DwG