Loading...
1998-12-01 CC Packet ir: City of Southlake, Texas . MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 The Town Square Status Report prepared by Deputy Director of Public Works Ron Harper and the CIP Report prepared by Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead are included in your packet under Item No. 4B. If you have any questions, contact Ron Harper, Bob Whitehead, or me. 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Approval of Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of IIINovember 17, 1998. Note that Sandy was unable to have the minutes of the November 17 meeting in your packet. We had computer problems last week, and given the short week she did not have time to compensate for the lost days. She will disseminate the minutes to you Monday night at the Library Board interviews. If you have any changes to the minutes of the November 17 regular City Council meeting, please discuss these at the work session or notify.Sandy LeGrand prior to the meeting if possible. She will bring the amended minutes to the meeting for your consideration. 2. Agenda Item No. 5B. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a developer agreement for Evergreen Estates. This developer agreement is for the 13 lot residential development of Evergreen Estates. The public infrastructure being constructed will include water,.sanitary._sewer, storm-sewer and- a public street. --This is a fairly standard agreement, with a few revisions to reflect that the developer agrees that no • building permits will be requested until all the infrastructure is completed and accepted by the City. (This is how we prefer it.) Given this, as stated in the memo Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 2 of 20 from Deputy Director of Public Works Charlie Thomas, the developer will not.be required to provide a cash escrow, letter of credit, performance bond and payment bond. These are required when the developer requests the ability to sell lots prior to the City's final acceptance of the infrastructure construction. (The City may allow the release for building permits of 10% of the lots prior to final acceptance of the development construction when the developer agrees to provide the bonds or other financial backing.) They will provide the maintenance bonds as required in a standard developer agreement. This type of agreement was executed for Myers Meadows, Napa Valley Phase I and II which ensures no building permits will be released until the development is completed in its entirety and approved by the City. Please contact Charlie or Bob Whitehead if you have any questions on this item prior to the meeting. • 3. Agenda Item No. 5C. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a commercial developer agreement for Southlake Oaks, Phase II. This agreement is a standard agreement for commercial development. This is the second phase of the commercial development known as Southlake Oaks Addition located on the northeast corner of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard and Shady Oaks Drive. The only public infrastructure to be installed is an 8-inch water line and a small amount of the storm sewer. The developer paid the park dedication fees at the time Phase I was developed. Water, sewer, and -street impact fees will be collected at the time building permits are issued. Contact Charlie Thomas or Bob Whitehead if you have questions on this item. -- 4. Agenda Item-No.--5D. --Authorization- to- advertise--for bids for-moving--Monticello - - — - Information Center to Bob Jones Park. Terry Wilkinson donated the Monticello Information Center to the City of Southlake for use at the park, and the Park Board approved the donation (per the donation policy) at its October 12 meeting for use as a PPV Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 3 of 20 part of the Nature Center at Bob Jones Park. SPDC approved authorization to advertise for bids at its meeting Monday, November 23. As Kevin Hugman points out in his memo, the Nature Center Committee met at the site and located a suitable area to place this building, shown on the map attached to his memo. We have talked to several contractors about moving the facility, who have provided varying cost estimates. Given this, staff is recommending we bid the project. We believe we have the time to take this approach, given our conversations with Mr. Wilkinson. 5. Agenda Item No. 5E. Award of bid to Circle H Contractors for the installation of sanitary sewer in the Cedar Creek Plantation Addition. The Cedar Creek Plantation Addition is scheduled to receive sanitary sewer improvements as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program. This construction is scheduled for funding in the 1998-1999 CIP budget with an estimated cost of $110,400. The design of the sanitary sewer was completed during the previous fiscal year. There were four bids received for this project with the low bidder providing a base bid of $74,675.85, which is $35,724.15 under the estimated amount in the CIP budget. The bid by Circle H Contractors is significantly lower than the others, however, the Circle H Contractors is a reputable company and we feel they will complete the work according to our standards. Please contact Bob Whitehead if you have any questions regarding this item. 6. Agenda item No. 5F. Resolution No. 98-76, Urging the Texas Legislature to increase appropriations for road and bridge maintenance and expansion. The Texas Department of Transportation—reported - that only- one-third -of--the - State's transportation needs will be addressed over the next ten years without increased • funding. The Regional Transportation Council and the North Central Texas Council of Governments Executive Board,adopted a regional policy position on PPV Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 4 of 20 State transportation funding issues to address during the upcoming legislative session. The organizations encouraged area cities to support their efforts. This resolution defines the City's support in the effort to encourage the Texas Legislature to provide for increased transportation funding. 7. Agenda Item No. 5G. Authorize the Mayor to enter into an interlocal agreement for ambulance service between Denton County and the City of Southlake. Interlocal contracts and mutual aid agreements are valuable tools for cities and towns in our area to enhance public safety service delivery. Each year the City of Southlake enters into an annual interlocal agreement with Denton County to provide ambulance services within the unincorporated portions of Denton County. This service provides timely emergency medical response to residents in Denton County who otherwise would not obtain immediate ambulance response due to their remote proximity from other municipal fire stations. This service does not place any burden on our abilities to provide ambulance services to the citizens of Southlake, and we receive ancillary benefits through other cooperative agreements with the County. As stated in the memo from Public Safety Director Billy Campbell, this agreement includes the initial collection of $1,307.03 from Denton County for the service, with the possibility of collecting additional fees based on the number of ambulance calls are provided to Denton County residents. 8. Agenda Item No. 5H. Authorize the Mayor to enter into an interlocal agreement for fire protection-services between Denton County andthe-City--of-Southlake. -This annual interlocal agreement between Denton County and the City of Southlake provides fire protection services in the designated unincorporated areas of Denton County. This agreement also provides for mutual aid from Denton County to Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 5 of 20 engage in fire services in the City of Southlake when their services are needed. Denton County will pay the City $5,000 upon execution of the agreement and $137.50 per fire call within the unincorporated area of Denton County. The agreement also stipulates the County will provide an 800 Mhz radio to the, City for use during the duration of the contract. Please contact Billy Campbell if you have any questions regarding this item. 9. Agenda Item No. 5I. Change Order #1 to Thomas Brothers Grass for preparation of soil prior to laying sod at Bob Jones Park. The memo from Kevin Hugman describes our need to prepare the soil prior to laying the sod at Bob Jones Park. The dilemma faced with the sod installation emanates directly from our difficulties finalizing the • grant with TPWD. Fortunately, staff has been able to convince them to consider covering this cost, in spite of the fact that we have not yet signed the contract. In any case, we must get the sod installed as soon as possible for the reasons pointed out in Kevin's memo. Otherwise, we risk not having the fields ready for spring play. SPDC approved the change order to Thomas Brothers Grass at its meeting on Monday, November 23. 10.Agenda Item No. 5J. Resolution 98-74, Adopting the Texas State Library & Archives Commission schedules and guidelines for records retention. This resolution provides for the City of Southlake to adopt the record retention schedule issued by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission. The Local Government Records Act of 1989 required local governments to adopt record control schedules-to guide their records management-program. This schedule defines the length of time various types of documents for each municipal function • are to be retained. Municipalities were given the ability to apply more stringent Fr Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest 0 City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 6 of 20 schedules to their records retention program, but were required to adopt at least the minimum scheduling. 11.Agenda Item No. 5K. Authorize the Mayor to enter into an interlocal agreement with Tarrant County regarding use of the Recycling Center for record disposal. As stated in the memo from City Secretary Sandy LeGrand, this interlocal agreement will allow us to send our documents to Tarrant County for use of their recycling center for destruction. They have recently expanded their services to allow local government agencies to use the facility. We do not have a copy of the agreement, but Sandy will forward it to you when she receives it. Please contact Sandy if you have any questions regarding this item. 12. Agenda Item No. 5L. Authorization to advertise for bids for aerial photography 110 services in order to develop topographic information for the Drainage Master Plan. Updated aerial photographs of the City are needed to provide detailed topographic information for the development of the Drainage Master Plan. As you are aware, the City has obtained the professional services of Freese & Nichols to develop the Drainage Master Plan. The first phase of this project includes an evaluation of the existing conditions of the city-wide drainage infrastructure, which requires an assessment of the City's existing mapping and geographic information system. The current topographic maps do not have the accuracy necessary to actually develop and design the City's drainage plan. An updated topographic map of the City will provide the tool necessary to move forward with the actual development of the Drainage Master Plan. These topographic maps will also provide for improved - quality and accuracy of future-infrastructure design- - - q tY Y studies:-- -- -- -- -- -- -—- ---- 0 As stated in the' memo from Director of Public Works Bob Whitehead, it is important to complete the aerial photograph during the winter months when foliage , rr Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest 0 City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 7 of 20 is at a minimum. In order to complete the aerial photograph in February, it is time to seek bids in order to execute a contract by the end of December. The estimated cost to develop detailed topographic maps is $150,000, and will be funded through the 1999 CIP but will be eligible for reimbursement through the Stormwater Drainage Utility District (SDUD) currently being developed. If you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Bob Whitehead. 13. Agenda Item No. 6A. Public Forum. Given the number of telephone calls we have received over the last few days, it will not surprise me to see a number of people show up to speak about their complaints with Marcus Cable. As a follow-up on cable complaints, we know that you have also received many phone calls about the IIIinstallation of fiber optics and the requirement for a converter box to receive any service beyond the basis cable, i.e., the "off-air" or broadcast stations which can be received off the air waves with an antenna. According to information we received from Marcus Cable, there are 3,089 total subscribers (as of 7/31/98), of which 1,822 did not have converter boxes prior to the upgrade. According to Marcus, the vast majority of these customers had the "Basic Showcase" package, not just basic cable. This number give you an idea of the number of upset customers. We will disseminate to you on Tuesday night a brief statement on the process we follow, why, and what our cable provider options are including our participation in the consortium. — — _ 0 14.Agenda Item No. 7A. Sign Ordinance No. 704-A, 2nd Reading, Proposing changes in Article IV, General Sign Provisions and Article V, Specific Sign Regulations. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest 40 City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 8 of 20 The changes recommended by City Council (10/13/98 meeting) and P&Z (11/5/98 meeting) as well as "clean up" items are detailed in the memorandum prepared by Stefanie Sarakaitis, ext. 753. At its last meeting, City Council asked staff to contact any parties directly impacted or interested in the recommended changes in Ordinance No. 704-A. Several contacts were made, with additional recommendations from these parties being added to the memorandum. In addition, the phase out plan for subdivision marketing signs has been incorporated into this draft: [Any subdivision marketing signs for houses permitted on or before 12/01/98 will be allowed the following regulations: definition - a temporary sign used to market or advertise residential subdivisions and builders and direct interested persons to the subdivision location; a maximum of three (3) signs advertising the same item per grouping of signs; no sign may be placed closer than fifty feet (50') from an intersecting R.O.W., signs advertising the same item may be no closer than ten feet (10) apart; placement from 12:00 noon Friday to 12:00 noon Monday; a reduction of these signs shall occur in increments of 25% of the total number of applicable signs (approximately 500 signs at the date of this ordinance) every three (3) months to terminate on 12/01/99, at which time the regulations of§ 22.A will apply.] The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 concurring with the recommendations submitted and asking for additional clarification as to the method of measurement of the window signs. This clarification has been added to - the draft submitted for Council review. - The City Council approved the 1st reading of Ordinance No.-704-A on consent, with the addition of a phase-out plan being • generated for the subdivision marketing signs. Feel free to contact Stefanie pipr- Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest • City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 9 of 20 Sarakaitis should you have any questions regarding the revisions proposed in the sign ordinance. 15.Agenda Item No. 7B. Ordinance No. 480-291, 2nd Reading (ZA 98-113), Rezoning AG to SF-lA (Kaeini). There are no unresolved issues related to the zoning request portion of this application. As was discussed at 1st reading on November 17, there are some concerns with drainage. Apparently all of the surrounding properties drain to this property.. The prior owner of the land had brought in some fill on his property, and this somewhat distorted the natural flow'of water through the property. Adjacent lot owners are wanting assurances that the drainage that has always gone through this property continues to do so, and does not back up on their lots. Engineering staff is familiar with the issues and is communicating with the applicants regarding how they anticipate resolving the drainage concerns. The plat showing was tabled at P&Z to resolve some of the drainage concerns and give the applicant time to clarify his needs as to the number of lots he was proposing. Related to the zoning request, there is a super-majority vote requirement .for approval on this item due to the surrounding owner opposition being greater than the 20% threshold. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 based on the fact that the SF1 requested was less intense than the medium density the Land Use Plan might allow. The City Council on November 17, 1998 approved this item on 1st reading(7-0). Feel free to contact Karen Gandy or Dennis Killough regarding this application or Charlie Thomas regarding the drainage issues • 16.Agenda Item No. 7C. ZA 98-131, Site Plan for Southridge Center. This is a site plan for an office building located on Corporate Circle northeast of the intersection Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 10 of 20 of Southlake Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue, south of the Southridge Lakes residential development. The significant issues discussed at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting included the architectural and setback requirements for the carport proposed on the site and screening. The commission felt that the applicant should comply with the screening requirements as stated in the Staff Review or work out an agreement with the adjacent property owners. With regard to the carport, the applicant felt he needed to confer with his architect further on the placement of the carport and the feasibility of complying with the architectural standards. He requested that the carport be eliminated from consideration with this site plan request. • The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval on November 19, 1998 (7-0) subject to the Staff Review and deleting all items related to the carport. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough regarding this item. 17.Agenda Item No. 7D. ZA 98-134, Site Plan for Tom Thumb Center and Eckerd's. This is a site plan which proposes retrofitting Tom Thumb into the old Food Lion site at the northwest corner of Southlake Boulevard and N. White Chapel Boulevard. This plan also includes the relocation of the Eckerd's from the Food Lion site, across the street to the northeast corner of Southlake Boulevard and N. White Chapel, since each hinge on the approval of the other. The staff review comments and motion made by the commission are complex due to the constraints placed on the site by the existing conditions and non-compliance with regulations which were not in place at-the-time of original construction._- The issues raised —------ - regarding the retrofit include bufferyards, landscape, driveways, building 0 articulation and impervious coverage regulations. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-2) on November 19, 1998 subject to the pr- Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 11 of 20 Staff Review amended as noted in the Staff Report granting relief to the majority'of these issues. Chairman Creighton and Commissioner Peebles dissented stating they felt that the Eckerd site should comply with impervious coverage requirements. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough regarding this item. 18.Agenda Item No. 8A. Ordinance No. 480-293, 1st Reading (ZA 98-133) Rezoning from CS to S-P-2 with C-3 uses. This is the rezoning request associated with the Tom Thumb project (item 7D, Case ZA98-134). The rezoning request is fora 1.17 acre tract which was deeded by the City to the developer of the Tom Thumb site in exchange for a 1.58 acre tract west of the old Food Lion site. The purpose of the rezoning is to match the existing zoning of the proposed Tom Thumb site in order to combine the two tracts. The only concern of the Planning and Zoning • Commission was the permitted "Movie Theater" use. Since this zoning needs to match the zoning of the tract it is being combined with, it was inappropriate to place a restriction on this proposed zoning that is not on the greater piece. The applicant made a commitment to deed restrict both tracts prohibiting the "Movie Theater" use. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) on November 19, 1998 and accepting the applicant's commitment to deed restrict both tracts as noted. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough regarding this item. 19. Agenda Item No. 8B. ZA 98-135, Plat Revision for proposed Lots 2R1, 2R2, and 4R, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition. This is the Plat Revision associated with the Tom Thumb site (items 7D and 8B). There are no unresolved issues regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0-2) subject to the-Staff Review amended-as noted in the Staff Report on November 19, - - 1998. Chairman Creighton and Commissioner Peebles abstained. Feel free to contact Dennis Killough regarding this item. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 12 of 20 20.Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution No. 98-75, Appointments of members to serve on the Library Board. This resolution identifies the City Council's appointments of members to serve on the newly created Library Board. The interviews will be held on Monday, November 30th at 6:00 p.m. at the Administrative Offices. There were 21 applications received and all applicants have been invited to the City Council interviews. 21.Agenda Item No. 10A. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a developer agreement for The Woods. This is a standard agreement with the usual requirements. The Woods Addition consists of 8 residential lots located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Florence Road and Pearson Lane. It was platted in 1996, but never developed because sanitary sewer was not available at the time and the developer's pursuit to rezone the property. The only public infrastructure to be built is the sanitary sewer. Half of the lots will be located in the S-1 drainage basin, which will connect to the City of Keller sanitary sewer system through the interlocal agreement. The other half of the lots are located in the S-2 drainage basin requiring the developer to install a sanitary sewer line and tie into the sewer line in Sutton Place. As you recall, the City Council discussed at great length the zoning for this _ property. Although the land use plan called for zoning with smaller lot sizes, the rezoning for one acre lots to 20,000 square foot lots for this development was not approved by the City Council. Therefore, this development is being developed with one acre lots according to the current zoning. Although this is a standard developer agreement, this item was not placed on ,411 consent agenda because of the history regarding this development. We try to reserve the Consent Agenda for items considered to be routine by City Council. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 13 of 20 Following discussion at the work session, this could be a candidate for the Consent Agenda. 22.Agenda Item No. 10B. Authorization to advertise for bids for a pump, motor, and electrical switchgear for modifications to the Southlake/Keller Pump Station. The memo from Bob Whitehead describes the background to this project. This item is part of the system expansion necessary before the summer of 1999 to ensure water supply is adequate to our residents. In order to stay on schedule, it is necessary to prepurchase these critical elements for the pump station modifications due to the lead-time required. The estimated costs for purchasing these items is $105,000. • The equipment purchase and installation costs are estimated to total $300,000 and are proposed to be funded from the 1998-1999 CEP budget. After the award of bid for the prepurchased items, the next step in this project will include advertising for bids for the installation of these prepurchased items. Under the terms of our existing contract with the City of Keller, modifications to the Southlake/Keller pump station associated with improvements to the water distribution system are to be shared 50/50 by the two cities. Contact Bob Whitehead if you have any question regarding this item. 23.Agenda Item No. 10C. Sign variance appeal for a wall sign for Crestwood office building at 1100 Bast-Southlake-Boulevard:-- This-sign-variance-appeal is to-request --- for a wall sign, which is not currently defined in the sign ordinance. This request is to allow for the construction of a stone wall to be erected in front of the building, facing F.M. 1709. This wall will be located 15 feet from the building and run the Vr Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest . • City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 14 of 20 full length of the building, and meets the Sign Ordinance's requirement for the placement of a monument sign. As the sign drawing shows (attached to the memo from Billy Campbell),the wall sign will provide the only signage on the front side of the building. The proposed wall varies in height from three to four and a half feet high, with offsets for planters. Since there is no provision in the Sign Ordinance for this type of wall sign, the calculations for monument and attached signs were applied to this case. The Sign Ordinance allows for one monument sign per building with a maximum sign face of 50 square feet, and one attached sign of .75 square feet per foot of frontage. Applying the calculations for attached signs to the Crestwood building, there would be a total of 195 square feet of attached sign permitted for the 260 foot long 411 building at the Crestwood Office Park. With the addition of the 50 square feet allowed for a monument sign, the total sign face would include 245 square feet. If the proposed stone wall is allowed to be constructed, and the calculations for an attached sign are applied, the present configurations would include a total of 184 square feet of sign area. The length of the wall would have provisions for a maximum of seven sign panels totaling 250 square feet. 24.Agenda Item No. 10D. Authorizing staff to proceed with acquisition of right-of- way for construction of Michael Drive. This item requests authorization to proceed with the acquisition of right-of-way dedication for construction of Michael Drive. The City Council has asked staff to look at the steps necessary to begin the process - -- — - of-initiating improvements to Michael- Drive. Prior to any - infrastructure - --improvements necessary to bring Michael Drive into compliance with our 0 ordinances, the first step is to acquire right-of-way. The right-of-way width required for industrial or commercial property is 60 feet. Therefore, each property Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 - Page 15 of 20 owner along Michael Drive will be required,to dedicate a 30 foot wide strip of property along the frontage of Michael Drive measured from the centerline of the roadway. We will be providing more information to you concerning the alternatives for funding the improvements, including how assessment paving works. We were not able to get all this together due to the short time frame associated with Thanksgiving. In a related topic, note the breakdown of the property values, etc., attached to my memo which Lou Ann Heath worked up at your request. 25.Agenda Item No. 10E. Any action necessary to proceed with granting a sanitary sewer easement along the westerly property line of City owned Tract 6F, T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract 706 (also known as former Glosser Tract) in order for Countryside Bible Church to construct a sanitary sewer line. The Countryside Bible 411 Church is requesting an easement to install a sanitary sewer line and connect to the sanitary sewer located in the Fox Hollow Addition. Capital Projects Coordinator Shawn Poe has conducted the initial research to determine the closest and most appropriate access point for the church to connect to an existing sewer line. The nearest connection point is at the end of Fox Glen in the Fox Hollow development. In order for the church to connect to this point, the proposed sewer line would need to extend southeasterly along Lot 9 in the Fox Hollow development, and then extend south along the westerly portion the City owned tract. The sewer alignment can be designed to offset from the property line to minimize any possible tree damage to the existing trees along the property. Once the church receives the initial authorization from the City regarding the easement, the church will then obtain a survey firm to define the exact limits of theidentify -- - the existing topography. The survey instrument is required before officially releasing the right-of-way. Note the easement is for a specific purpose, but it is not limited specifically to the church. However, it will mostly benefit the church. - Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 16 of 20 Given the large number of persons in the church during any given meeting or service, it is to the City's benefit to have the church on municipal sewer rather than a septic system. In taking this action, we would ask you to authorize the staff to file the dedication instrument once the exact alignment of the easement is identified. This item was not placed on the Consent Agenda because it is not exactly routine, however, if all your questions are satisfactorily answered after work session it could also be a candidate for the Consent Agenda. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this item. 26. Agenda Item No. 10F. Any action necessary to authorize the Mayor to enter into a • professional services agreement with an architect for Town Hall. We received Schwarz's response this afternoon. It appears he has agreed to everything we requested, however, it will be Monday before we are able to break it down. There will probably be an article in the Star-Telegram tomorrow or in the next few days. Marisa Taylor requested a copy, and I faxed it to her because she was aware of the substance of the letter following her conversation with Schwarz's office earlier today. Please let me know if you have any questions prior to the meeting. 27. Agenda Item No. 11A. Conditional Sign Permit for Town Square. This item was placed on the agenda to begin discussion regarding this request for a conditional sign permit for Town Square. We previously suggested holding a separate work session to to allow the City Council more time to review this request. Since the - upcoming holiday season does not permit the time to hold a separate worksession, I - — — thought the City Council could begin discussions of this item now. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 17 of 20 Included in your packet is the developer's request for a conditional sign permit for the Town Square development. The matrix outlines most of the variations of the proposed regulations with the existing sign ordinance. As highlighted in the memo from Deputy Director of Public Works Ron Harper, the developer is requesting the use of a maximum sign area of 1 square foot for every foot of frontage instead of the .75 square feet as allowed in the current Sign Ordinance. This concept of signage was discussed at City Council on August 19, 1997, with the approval of the site plan. The typical tenant signage was included on page 7K-28 of that agenda item. This is the same exhibit as A-8 that is included in the request (notebook) for approval. 111 28. Agenda Item No. 11B. Entry Portal Concept Development. This item is on your agenda for discussion, after having forwarded it to you in virtually the same form for the last November meeting then pulling it due to the number of items on the agenda. Included in your packet is a summary of recommendations and related sketches regarding concepts for entry portals. Preliminary feedback that we have received from a few Councilmembers is that these recommendations look good and are on track with what is anticipated for these portals. There are several points;for which we will be seeking general direction related to these preliminary concepts. Feel free to contact Director Last or Senior Planner Chris Carpenter (ext. 866) should you have any comments regarding these proposals. 29.Agenda Item No. 11C. Project and Financing Plan for Tax Increment Reinvestment -Zone Number One: We have had as you know a number of ongoing discussions — -- - -- with the CISD concerning the inclusion of school projects within the TIF 411 boundaries. This would require the gerrymandering of the TIF boundaries and adjustments to the project and fmancing plans. As of this date, we have been Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest 411) City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 18 of 20 unable to reach an agreement with CISD. Tuesday night our bond counsel Ed Esquivel and city attorney Debra Drayovitch, who have been working with us on the TIF, will be attending the executive session to go over the legal aspects of where we are at this time in the process. There are still a number of things that we could do that would enable the CISD to take advantage of "robin hood" monies if they are willing to agree to certain stipulations, which I do not believe they are willing to do. I am not sure we can make this work, so after Tuesday's meeting we will have a position statement for the City Council to use in this matter. There is still action to be taken by the City Council so that we can go forth with our projects. Please let me know if you have questions prior to the meeting. I _ • OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST . 30.Recent accident involving a city vehicle - On Thursday, November 19th, a city vehicle was involved in an accident on North Whites Chapel in the construction zone. The City staff was providing.construction zone traffic.control in the area. The city worker was driving north bound when hit by an oncoming car. . The wheels of the oncoming car went of the shoulder of the road and the driver over compensated to get the vehicle back on the road. In doing so, the driver hit the City truck. Both individuals were transported to the hospital for injuries, but neither participant appeared to have serious life threatening injuries. The City worker sustained a minor injury and was released from the hospital. The extent of injuries of the other driver is not know at this time. The truck involved in this accident was part of the street division's fleet, but was 110 the one vehicle scheduled for replacement this year. The exact damages to 'the vehicle are currently being appraised, but it appears as though it will be considered Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest 0 City Council Meeting December 1, 1998 Page 19 of 20 a total loss. Although this truck was scheduled for retirement, we planned to continue to use it as a spare vehicle. This accident will not afford us the ability to get use from the spare vehicle. 31.Runyan Drainage Issue. I had hoped to meet with Mr. Runyan prior to Tuesday night to address his drainage problem, but his schedule would not allow, however, I have been able to arrange a meeting with him for Monday, December 7. We have not placed a separate discussion item on the agenda for this issue, since there is nothing new to add since the last City Council meeting. At this time we are continuing to move forward with the Freese and Nichols professional services for the development of the Drainage Master Plan. 32. Other Items of Interest mailed Friday, November 20. It has been brought to my • attention that as of today you still had not received a packet of Other Items of Interest we mailed last Friday. Attached to my memo is that packet of information. Our intention was to get this to you early enough to review prior to the regular packet going out so that you would not have so much to review at one time. We hope to continue this practice, but will probably have the information delivered next time rather than rely on mail service. 33.Also included with my memo is: • a copy of the upcoming events calendar t. „, . . iiStaff Extension Numbers: Barlow, Kate, Economic Development Specialist, ext. 776 • l�. f :t ,. f, T{ 1Fi Y,' - C .,, - ytl 1.1 J Itt ,;47 1 .•"k, ..11 YLII l 1 1,! 1i1 1 •'►.` ,, ,' wt v J _* i' 1 ,1. , g� Page 20 0 "4 '' - • _ - `, -„"r ;.:•:`'l. ." • •%La;',,F- Y"f tY.Yr >,f ... _ Bloomberg, Chuck, Plans E an ne ' `1 •7,� 'i.;;•" Ccunpbell,^R Director DPI'earl` 3 y . i'r 'ltt..'r i d x• .(- rpen e/,1' I.�c-Pla n r,, eztt t�i�{'Y";' t ' r`•i'4e,C Y"; ira"4-f"I ihriing t'�d l�or, .,a . A•, ' Harper,'Ron; CiiyEngineer," 773y -; Hawk, Cu `F...,:ext. 701 -~'" r ,r" - :'+ . Heath, Lou A,p Director of Finance,+ t� a ti - k-'';-':,( Humr'K i ` rectat-o i ,; * '�' ga� ; '` 'a�.- s%'4' Kkug,- arP i r� a 1;f r. • ' - LeGrana, S'a idr..a;-•City°Secretary a ,, . Jackson;:Malcolm, DPS A nistrative•.a, ,ti.y , ,; `. - . •Queen, Courtney," Community Services CO-x¢- ,,,t„� '� ,�_ o y r + K, t -ram . ▪.' ,Safranek,',Laur,en,""Director of Human;ResQ ` !,, . `f ' .4 1 <� x >sX� - Sarakaitis, Stefanie, Coinprelieirsiye'P � ' "� ' �" � '� ,� _ .fir. � ' fi � � . ' � z,ti .��•� � . ; ' Siemer, Sheik Assistant,to the,City"'Managef,► . : *". 7 " * `"` • - `Diomas;-,Charlie, Deputy Director Publ"t-, , 'r t '. ,_ 1;t r 1, 2T r' j - Wilson, Garland,-Deputy.-Director Fire Se !! k- -� ' "`;_,���' s, .F�,,.:_ ., • Whitehead,.Bob;"Detector of Public'Wor ;FK'' .14: -`-- f `;`r' c " ' .• ' _,arc, r,y.•�•. "...-fit.. 1A`'�f 13,• F A{'i` 'wt; ;Whitehead;..Nona, Community Services'-.Co 4' .' 10." 1 I a i ,�2 • t .,",..,1,;. ` _ • _ • •_Yelverton, Shana,`-Assistant City Manager, e,Ct(:,705.: , ;,,, .vt 0 < ` ' `" - - = M:\WD-FILFS\CEII\MEEIINGS\98-12-01.doc -:i0:�i1=�-�?=i=.:fivhIr.•:, :,4 .,,--is!••, _ • . . - - - - i ;' ' ' "s ' -__ ------__ _' _ .':pj ",1 y�. ;"S=,Gtiu'4,-.'�P(�"Iw,r+�"ip`ytr: , , r y# ;' s;._ r ` ,. . - ±E;'.,rL•.' \:k ,A 3'E,M,' ,�.a '3-, .y c 5�; ., •,-'rs +:��,'ti.' !�- ,.6-- • • p TIFFANY ACRES ADDITION FY1998-99 Property Values VALUE VALUE TOTAL VALUE PERSONAL OWNER LOT/BLOCK ACRES LAND IMPROVEMENTS REAL PROPERTY DBA PROPERTY TOTAL VALUE Prestige Gunite, Inc. Block A, Lot 1 1.000 $ 65,340 $ 91,400 $ 156,740 Prestige Gunite, Inc. $ 1,283,192 $ 1,439,932 Prestige Gunite Block A, Lot 2A 0.519 $ 33,977 $ - $ 33,977 $ 33,977 John J. Famiglio Block A, Lot 2B 0.519 $ 33,977 $ 99,023 $ 133,000 Mid-Cities Ornamental Iron $ 52,898 $ 185,898 Robert J.Van Til Block A, Lot 3 1.000 $ 65,340 $ 78,870 $ 144,210 International Supply Inc. $ 152,538 $ 296,748 Orlando Concrete, Inc. Block A, Lot 4 1.000 $ 65,340 $ - $ 65,340 $ 65,340 Robert J.Van Til Block A, Lot 5A 0.480 $ 31,428 $ 21,795 $ 53,223 $ 53,223 Thomas&T. Reardon Pot Block A, Lot 5B 0.519 $ 22,608 $ - $ 22,608 $ 22,608 Verlo Strand Block B, Lot 1 1.000 $ 58,806 $ - $ 58,806 $ 58,806 Verb Strand Block B, Lot 2 1.000 $ 58,806 $ - $ 58,806 $ 58,806 V.J.Strand Excavating Block B, Lot 3 1.000 $ 58,806 $ 108,410 $ 167,216 V.J. Strand Excavating $ 225,500 $ 392,716 Verb J. Strand I Block B, Lot 4 1.000 $ 52,272 $ - $ 52,272 $ 52,272 Bradley Jay Scribner; Block B, Lot 5 1.000 $ 65,340 $ 79,157 $ 144,497 Hoe Work, Inc. $ 262,409 $ 406,906 10.037 $612,040 $ 478,655 $ 1,090,695 $ 1,976,537 $ 3,067,232 • current annual property tax revenue-real and'personal property(@$.422 tax rate) $ 12,944 - current annual estimate of sales tax(1-1/2%) I $ 51,036 • . 1 III ,,T,_ a Upcoming Meetings & Events November 29 - December 19 . SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY November 29 November 30 December 1 December 2 December 3 December 4 ' December 5 11:30 AM- 1:30 PM 7:00 PM City Council 7:00 PM Crime Control 7:00 PM P&Z Mtg/ City Council Briefing Mtg/Council Mtg/Council Council Chambers uj ' Chambers Chambers 7:00 PM SPIN#14/Sr. 8:00 AM-12:00 PM Center Breakfast With Santa/ 7:00 PM SYAC Mtg/ Durham Elementary Community Center Mayor out of town December 6 December 7 December 8 - December 9 December 10 December 11 December 12 > 5:30 PM- 7:00 PM KSB Mtg/ 7:00 PM SPIN#9E/Sr. 7:00 PM Helmet Ord. 6:30 PM SPIN Standing/ PACKET DAY ,1,, ,�� � 8:30 PM Community Center Center Committee Mtg/Sr. Sr.Center '1 � Holiday 7:00 PM JUC Mtg/ iiil • the Center 'ti "'' Administrative Bldg. , �'�' v •Park/ -a ` Bicenten- 7:00 PM SPIN(Joint City N. nial Park Council)/Sr.Center 9:00 AM-3:00 PM Snack with Santa/ Mayor out of town ` Durham Elementary I I December 13 December 14 December 15 December 16 December 17 December 18 December 19 11:30 AM- 1:30 PM 7:00 PM City Council 6:30 PM Youth Park 5:00 PM Chamber Holi- City Council Briefing Mtg/Council Board Mtg/Commu- day Open House/Texas 6:30 PM Park Board Mtg Chambers nity Center National Bank new /City Hall member reception 7:OOPMP&ZMtg/ .; Council Chambers First Day of Hanukkah October November December I January SMTWT F S SMTWT F S SMTWT F S SMTWT F S 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 4 • 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 • 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 24 25 26 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 11/25/98 €SPINcity manager' s report Ov®' November 2591998 Upcoming Meetings City Council Meeting - December 1, 1998 The following items will be addressed at the regular City Council meeting on December 1S` December 1, 1998 City Council Consent Agenda: ____ � 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber B) Developer Agreement for Evergreen Estates Keep Southlake Beautiful Class C) Developer Agreement for Southlake Oaks Phase II 7:15 p.m. Sr. Activity Center D) Authorization to advertise for bids for moving the Monticello Information Center December 2, 1998 E) Award of bid for installation of sanitary sewer in Cedar Creek Plantation Crime Control& Prevention F) Res. 98-76 Urging the Texas Legislature in increase appropriations 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber G) Interlocal agreement for ambulance service with Denton County SYAC H) Interlocal agreement for fire protection services with Denton County n Approval of Change Order#1 to Thomas Brothers Grass 7:00 p.m. Community Center J) Res. 98-74 Adopting the Texas State Library & Archives Commission schedules and guidelines for records retention December 3, 1998 K) Interlocal agreement with Tarrant County regarding use of the recycling center Planning & Zoning L) Authorization to advertise for bids of aerial photography services in order to 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber develop topographic information for the Drainage Master Plan Ordinances second readings and related items: A) Sign Ordinance 704-A, proposing changes in Article IV and V B) Ord. 480-291 Rezoning for West Continental approx. 250' east of Southlake Development Activity Hills Drive (#16) C) ZA 98-131 Site Plan for Southridge Center, approx. 350' east of North Peytonville and 400' north of West Southlake Blvd. (#13) P&Z December 3, 1998 D) ZA 98-134 Site Plan for Tom Thumb Center and Eckerds (#10) Ordinances, first readings and related items: 98-136 Zoning/Site Plan, Davis A) Ord. 480-293 Rezoning for the west side of White Chapel, approximately 700' Boulevard Center (#15-#16) north of Southlake Boulevard. (#10) 98-137 Zoning/Site Plan, Davis B) ZA 98-135 Plat Revision for the northwest corner of White Chapel & 1709 (#10) Boulevard Center (#15-#16) Resolutions: 98-138 Specific Use Permit, A) Res. 98-75 Appointments of members to serve on the Library Board Service Station, Davis Blvd. Other items for consideration Center (#15-16) A) Developer agreement for The Woods B)Advertising for bids for modifications to the Southlake/Keller Pump Station 98-139 Plat Showing, Davis Blvd. C)Sign variance appeal for a wall sign for Crestwood office building Center (#15-16) D)Authorizing staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition for construction on Michael Dr. 98-112 Plat Revision, Green E)Any action necessary to proceed with granting a sanitary sewer easement Meadow Subdivision (#7) F)Any action necessary for a professional services agreement with an architect for Town Hall Other items for discussion: 98-130 Zoning/Concept Plan, A)Conditional Sign Permit for Town Center Harris Methodist (#8) B)Entry Portal Concept Development 98-147 Plat Revision, Harris C)Project and Financing Plan for Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number one Methodist (#8) s SPIN Meetings 98-144 Plat Showing, Granberry g Addition (#14) SPIN #10 - November 30 - 7:00 p.m. Sr. Activity Center • 98-146 Final Plat, Loch Meadow Proposed office complex for North Carroll Avenue Estates SPIN #14 - December 2 -7:00 p.m. Sr. Activity Center (#3) Proposed zoning change for a Dance Studio at 507 W. Southlake Boulevard "8-141 Site Plan, Taco Bueno SPIN#9E- December 8 - 7:00 p.m. Sr. Activity Center r)748) Department of Public Safety staff will present information and answer questions related to the process necessary to obtain various neighborhood traffic regulation devices. City of Southiake, Texas • Recent submittals for your information. CASE DESCRIPTION 98-148 PLAT SHOWING (STAFF REVIEW) Milner Addition, Lot 3, Block A Location: On the south side of East Highland Street, approximately 250' east of Summerplace Lane Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural Applicant: Barta& Holland, Inc. Owners: Milner Enterprises 98-149 REZONING AND SITE PLAN Barton House Location: 1310 North White Chapel Boulevard Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan with "0-1" Office District uses Owner and Applicant: Uncommon Care d.b.a. Barton House 98-150 REZONING A.A. Freeman No. 522 Addition Location: On the west side of Southridge Lakes Parkway, southwest of the intersection of Travis Court and Southridge Lakes Parkway, extending west to North Peytonville Road Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential Owner and Applicant: Fred Joyce 98-151 PLAT SHOWING A.A. Freeman No. 522 Addition Location: On the west side of Southridge Lakes Parkway, southwest of the intersection of Travis Court and Southridge Lakes Parkway, extending west to North Peytonville Road Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential Owner and Applicant: Fred Joyce 98-152 SITE PLAN Panorama Place-Phase II Location: On the west side of North Carroll Avenue, approximately 375' south of Southcrest Lane Current Zoning: "0-1" Office District Applicant: Panorama Properties, Inc. Owner: John Cole City of Southlake, Texas 98-153 PLAT REVISION • Lot 9R, Block, The Lakes of La Paloma Location: 1100 La Paloma Court Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential Owner and Applicant: The Lakes of La Paloma,J.V. • • 18 an" MiR ' ll ♦ OEA � AI AuWW mom ataot rli� ML r AM LM AG i� 14 13 s bMalt a 12 . "�"R. \ t %2MW mL %W%L � ass r� i t saw trim yi f is law � OIdQ A tHt W \ �� N 01 ' 2' W I S 89'59'59r WIC �To a adAm PAM AREq; 342.90' mum AACOM 161 10.588 acres tiir.l also acme e; tutwttoM - ar S 00'( f \ om alueff — O.IIQ Ater w FLOOMM a ilirm eA•[i At3lr9� to b� 1• .289.89' ff ea. ,, A � A.M�asw M10 O 1Ir 70b ` ga"s& Ir G N 01'1SW W IL IL W L Some A�rl f. tt 141L SWWT. &405 Amelam 1�.1t AIM Allow � o NAM ALL tm O/ lac FFMOM tmum 4M film. bnbd7r ✓rt O.t b be ...r of ad ..bb A" of r W ..bt b O. Oly d D..MI AM tSWQ4 Q..rl 1.4 bdr � r.i+.tt r--bd b.. tr .r iR SO MOL b .wrb.tom d r ma of to /i WAS eLA» rtuAlt .d doh t..t r 1d.rb ..rr.0ft b ...fit r .it.i d drd b b.* +�.1 r ..d. -4 b O.r d- b.dr .d".am .plbb6% r b.- .11 b\i O. Oyr d ON Wb toi . ammtAM supw+► b.d'dbr ." *00f. Om .d wet all it= Y r.'r ad O.r mill, w bw.. b.+wr r. b r. lbw b w.M u b /� • u wrt ('d.rr wt.6 Yd br r A� d Ob bd..� d am Gam... r.d • =1,M t�i MA r A.y.t br .r*tY. d d t1 jt b O. & b► �wr Aumd dt y..rt b M t dw ON /wwh I.Oe� bm. r.w dwA.i al .6 . a.. ,. d to O.. % p7ry .1d • ad % lhmft► Own% •.% tl4 d/ btdnt Pwlkk% r / ~ ri lid.' be aniN/ y r 4p..0. d dwlt bluer d or brbc off b.A or � d d � b Od.4rut i0 br..1O..d Awr\ r r O.r r b.hr rat, w.b4 d/ .dam. Mt t .� i` abb ! r tdw bw1�lI4 r l7Fb . Mrrt +..A. r pq- snow d4 bd .lt bbb� .% 1 b dIr dwb tb ib f. �t d .. n O N �d bI b .►.we d d.K w wu . ta. �..t� .Ifr .dt.� d r.rt w u.de .M..t ..l .r wtvvwt lees r b fer..t Y i 1dw dd be bbr0 opm O. 41.r4 bb br. r ..ww. b bt.�t di br .dl ��..1l�. brdd b r �. d OIMYb UmFA OOn.IM 1.q mobs r O. YK r Y w w..dr b b A.. d 7..�!"O.,I leaf Delano w O. d1W d . am an ubr CommMN or 10011 a 1mMR m�tL b�b�.�rt ity�..Y OW ►.=mIMAM, w.-r r bwbrw d...�.b ...rd +b.p"O d r b i. Orb YL b ad he wit IMAM, �. ar O. M o Mr Imam An >a Or itta.. to b r. d . Itba P © nL ! P 5S 2R 1 R sr WW44r 9- Aa ` LOT 3 vWv BLOCK A 1,278.68' iq 11or,r MAP IL= �� aK wi art r acOOM O MbrnC[ mill Pfil# uscr A. SM 1a I I \•• A r Max GMMET A. SME \� I I it I II r M&a etmrJtf01 Ei A. SM tq �,S 88'21'02" E 375.73' 411mit11XIMMAME says v le OMMef f ltmlif 1ti��Y► l��t OEM f �% �br1l b���iyft a w � d r � Y�r � ` O.ti L R� b i rr r.b.1 M..06r I. r ...W" b Ota OO POP 11N b b to.d O..y NNW bNNd am M"+ pdbir r.rd .. tdwn s d • .d t-w bm 1.t • Me wMb ro of yid And purr dw -.Fw JM s.t Nodb d to rO AM, of .r Mm i Ad a..i ON b..d bdlc O. iO.d .s d to .rbd wd r bd0 d. tb MW OswamM . mom"pr.; ta1 r� A �/ b fir ArMYr .a�1 b b Oyr d >b1.Otr .�dt b Oltit • tY 7M11Q 1d or at Or Yt toatr bA dime tr M4 db of .al Rta Ana dr iq O. out Y 49 OM 1Atr A~ b..t I-bd br 1dt IMAM ta.b or r r Mal 314409 LA .rt On .rO db of NM Mw bmt �d d.0 b aA db d .rl 1r ~ r . ma fib M me •ma too or 7tt tY ad testa bd d" b db of on Rom but .r d.0 b am rb of am 1rr Artie lily % b r fr or tot WSM %A d q ON rd w d ltyrt MOM b b Pdt of r.r.bt r O.td+.0 111110 soft dsad .r.WISM to twit.t AL R1M� .M. t AM MAIM, ball 0.....t O. t.+. M W .b AM .. b.dld. r..it ..1Mlat MOM �.;� r . r P-M � CRY d �.� MAN& ti.► .r l r. rrr ryr npr r w M4a W t# at Imam► to.d O.ft ton. Mb as div d . Wal. am NAM am Mum POINT OF a'* BEGINNING �.r :. r �. .....bt.: L' :.: r:,� r"�..r� ` Morgan "am" M4 'UML Amin i w MAND NO tAt Or C Res .. rb b dw.1 . Itla Vr 21�~W IM+f tit L n �_ L EF Ill( 1AW ►in LOF I smemcn dunrKiv= ILI W A 11b b 1. .dg O t L t!-s C tbt0-L . �d /h.b.d.r W i.qr d b tAr. d lo.% bw*o /bit O. d.. � AC d.Yb. ti: �pA.t. d .ram d 1 bepq.y ..rr .. b ." r�isr tar .w+► r�.r. Oa ..r y .. err .q O..w. �r .t+W� ll M a Md.l tits W MAIM Al"W" BY UK are OF SMIUM e.. -- MAIM AYE Srr art l�1crM+ vim PAM? tM Ar. IN aq of O.Obb.� b Md t. n.pb. dd.� ft" bw der. br wddd drb i .rMb► tw d.d•. bM w b� b .rd .d..r bi..i. �d d YZ b �Yt b O.l MA .w be rJt.t b Arti.r b ft &W Y b- d...► .+ b. d10.4 b .&b..l sdrt t..r iY� PUT RECORD TARPMT COUNTY. TE CAS DATE FINAL PLAT MILNER ADDITION, LOT 3, BLOCK A AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 10.588 IN THE W.W. HALL SURVEY, A-687 ONE (1) LOT vinamb Comm T O R 1998 '�i> .Olc ` ,O.AM W long" 7011 M Nam ant 2" O,e AC etude etldrlO yvons trie L l r.Al. • mom T. aONa =LOW 00 !mM am It! tat MA" test I OF t fault i att>•� VOL. 3C0-217 PSI 71. PJLtat m-CFs10E (WD-Of:KIE/WW) ---------------- sa - - - - - - - - __ — - - - - .-----------N- - - - - - - y N 90'00'00-�42000_ .� _ I DBL. FACED oeL. FACED oQ \ I /' S HEIGHT FENCE S HEIGHT (�) / STOCKADE FENCE (TYP.) \ j I I / I � I I 1 I I I a' I I ill }I 1 1 1 I I b I � I t I I I I 1 I I n I I I i I I I _ f 2- RLO Jf NLLAGE VOL 365-213. PG. 34 PR7 C.T. SP1 (LUO-OFFICE/COM�) I W I � I p I o I I I I I t I I z I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 = I I I PHASE B PHASE I PROP. AC ca UNITS ®® 30' SNlDMO tat — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — .. +r is i I r BARTON HOUSE #2 i I r I � w n• n• s• w �. 10, BARTON R HOUSE # I or �I r U 4 it � S' IVI"--------- __a MARGUERITE E. W+OCLLEY VOL.. 12172. PG 1957. D.R.T.C.T. AG (LUO-RESIDENTIAL) 3 S 23 a DBL FACED 6' HEMT STOCKADE FENCE (T1'P.) sa at oQPHASE swu jE LKHT" / I -- — 24' FIRE LANE N' FIRE LANEI CO+G ►Mf,. — — — — — — — -- — — — — +ao' auacc tmL iu � I b i b� f DBL- FACED 6' HEIGHT STOCKADE FENCE (TypJ WWAM W. RUCKER k ZENA RUCKER. TRUSTEES YWWMI ML RUCKER # ZENA RUCKER FAMILY TRUST VDL 12591. PO. 2203 D.R.T.C.T. AG (LUO-RESIDENTIAL) a 1 1 0— m0, CA J La n O_ O Q� =a U GRAPHIC SCALE 1 N : 20 FT fD 0 1b b LOCATION MAP 114 RAIQIMR SUBJECT PROPER no.Aw TM ti "PAW i t SOUTMLAXE BLVD. I LOT 2-R. BLOCK A-80 PECK ADDITION VOL. 388-176, PG 50 P.R.T.C.T. COLIM SERVICE (LUO-PUBUCiSEMI-PUBLIC) 1 I SITE ADDRESS: 1310 WHITE CHAPEL ROAD q?-w SITE PLAN FOR SP1-01-PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES (ALZHEIMER'S) i ZONING REQUEST BARTON HOUSE i I UNCOMMON CARE, INC. I AN ASSISTED UWNG ALZHEIMER'S CARE FACILITY PROPOSED LOT 15 T.M. HOOD / 706 ADDITION 1 LOT aTY OF SOUTHLAKE. TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS PREPARED OCTOBER 22. 1M OWNER: UNCOMMON CARE. INC. LO L a n d C o n Inc. ROBERT MONTGOMERY 3808 BIG HORN TRAIL Eno*ws' BLiveyw$- Pkf1Fwo PL ANO, TEXAS 75075 29X rw++vw Ix. w t4 P 11 WW%Talm 7�olwDs Pn�74119-011,117 '85.0= FMWw%amus•a4m Drm mnv 9 R 144o 2ND FLOOR M WWI s >Q. SF . W-ro SF 04 SOUTHLAKE - BLDG. 1 FLOORPLAN 7w SCALE: w.r-W h NtIM-CVL vn=o a" chowr cQo'c9mr4M met" %*Gr - rm. PAX 9N7rfOtl BEAST ELEV. - [FRONT) rta xwe veeet SCALE 3nr . r4r CLOQOTvw rrwQ7 ocoo"t 1 Dater earcty iWW"STAE V9EM-rm. 2 SOUTH ELEV. - [SIDE] SCALE 313r . Tll CL MSTOW rocc►r cco-rm 10M ',7N4/1L Rco - rfr'. exrRrrei�c+�eerao 3 NORTH ELEV. - [SIDE) teoueMSTOMVtCl -TT*. SCALE 3/3r . T4r a" &OSLE 400- nal sm"Ne me", - rm. Tw. DorNYgJr 4 WEST ELEV. - [REAR] PWUW STO►e V041M-TYT. SCALE: 3/3r . T4r /]O jqq WAD NOV 2 31998 SLDQ FACADES FULFILL REOUIREMENTS OF 'MASONRY ORDNtMICE tur. FACADE ARTIOLLATION REOUREMENTS ARE ALSO FULFLLED AS DICTATED BY SECTION ".13 - DEVEL.OPIENT REOULATIPON4 OF THE RESIDENTIAL A04ACEIOCY STANDARDS FOUND SI THE 19011 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE COIiRENENsm 2ONNN3 ORDSIAANCL dc r t a O s= d 2 WOE _ Ma v ONJ ~ 4c 3 Q Luo m = T s REMSIOk SHEET Aml 1 OF 2 a 2ND FLOOR - � - � •ice: _ rl III --ynnllll--- -� �j � I V • � i SLDG. SF . 7830 SF ARTMIAL 9N000 *VW C W#W Copflowrc" 006" ROOT - rm. mww /C7O0 SHMI! t9 Po" STOW VEER - M. 1 SOUTH ELEV. - (FRONT) SCALE: 8/32- . T-W CUPIMTOW Yana+ MRrx4AL efl+cto am 04"er . Dom."t scram 2 WEST ELEV. - (SIDE) SCALE: 3/32- . T-O- 6IA LW ptoor OGra1D' GL1.7RbTatr MRIDGW } 3 EAST ELEV. - (SIDE) - . 4'r SCALE GO!lV�1T5Q1 �iR16i2 POOr - M. GW 1"IAON MGM �YotO Item DQT " F.aum eras Vim. - Tyr. 4 NORTH ELEV. - (REAR) SCALE: 3/32- . T-O- gvtp ffCD NOV 2 31998 i 0 W O N k, SOUTHLAKE - BLDG. 11 FLOORPLAN 1 e. 1fY.fa' IILDG. FACADES FULFILL REGUIREMENTs OF -MASONRY ORDINANCE tsm FACADE ARTICULATION REGIRREMENTS ARE ALSO FULFILLED AS DICTATED BY SECTION 4&18 - DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARDS FOUND IN THE *98 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE COMPRENENBIVE ZONING ORDINABICL SHEET A=2 I I i LOT 1. BLOCK 8l RA%ENAUX WAAGE \ \ va- 3W-211 M 31, i PRCC.T. al-&MCE (LUO-OFrICE/Com) err. 1---------------------- - ___----- ---------� - .N 90'00'00' E -- \� _ 420.00' / STOCKADE FENCE / •P \ �' (TW.) \ / (TY�P,) Xr Wu..c.Rc --------- -- -- — 1 r v _ �C--_-- 1� 1 1 — \------- t0' rs' u• rr « tY r7 .. u• �/ // I I �� PROP. AC BARTON ,= ' _ �' y o HOUSE 42 7 W 'a v n 6 tit, 7 b °D PHASE it 2r •0r 7 a 1 n h _ w 0 1 n PHASE ! --- n t7 r�. « IY ` a. « rr 301 Ile v �j 1 I • • ® r0' \ H 0 U1J' # 1 -r w w a f/_ 'ue a• tar_ v^A _ "a _ / l ` i• 1 Accm 1 an LOT 2. BLaac e. RAVENAUX NALLAGE VOL 388-213. PG. 31. P1 (LUD-OFnCE/CO+ w I .i 11. / .(a-i� ' % / / W f. / 21 oil LANE a� i � / _ 21' FIRE LAN o t Z YARD /64216. lv • // / wr s :•F �r / // /' /�/ / II I is d till / I ' �iS10L1C�FFNCE / � ♦44 // j/ //' // i ` I 1 I i TYP.) • i I I v I I /y FACgd / 4;46 GST / °y Ho OCICADE FENCE i 89'S8 59 W / / .tee ! "420.00 I YARGVEWTE E. wOp1EY / w4JJAM 'M. RUOCER ! ZENA RUCKER. TWAT / / / wWA1a w. RUCXER 8: ZENA RVOCERR FAWLY TRUST VOL 1217Z M 1257. / VOL 12591. PG. 2263 ORLC.T. / D.R.T.C.T. AG (LUO-RESOENDAL) AG (LUC-RESIDENTIAL) m `r J W d d 0 Q � = o_ U �o X 0 Z OWNER: UNCOMMON CARE. INC. ROBERT MONTGOMERY 3808 BIG HORN TRAIL PLANO. TEXAS 75075 t 1 ON GRAPHIC SCALE:'1 IN a 20 FT 70 0 1q O I LOCATION MAP IUWOUX _ .eoaAlo ry souTla.AKE Blw. LOT 2-R. BLOCX A-80 PECK ADDITION VOL 388-178. PG 30 P.R.T.C.T. Comm SERNCE (LUO-PUBUC/SEM1-PU8UC) RELIMINARY GRADING PLAN SITE PLAN FOR SPl-01—PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES (ALZHEIMER'S) ZONING REQUEST BARTON HOUSE UNCOMMON CARE, INC. AN ASSISTED LIVING ALZHEIMER'S CARE FACIUTY PROPOSED LOT 15 T.M. HOOD / 706 ADDITION 1 LOT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS PREPARED OCTOM 22. 1996 WLandCon Inc. E3>dneen • 8urveyon • PwrYlers 2m rwt*W M w on Fdr1 rar% Tewra.7'9WkU99 ►II am L000, r.rl Ww%Tem 748~ OX718o6eo0 rAX Ot01 ��p 3 31998 LOT 1. BLOCK B. / �\ \\ RA\EKAUX \l1ACE \ �.� VOL. 368-213. PG, 31. / \\ \\ PRLC.T. / ��� Ot-OFTKE (U1D�OFFICE/COW) I FACED ?. I DBL. S-OCXADE FENCE (TYP.) �Y \ /1 I 1/' I � � I I c � � I A I 1 I I I 11 ;I I I 1 I 1 I tl tl I I l I I 1 1 1 I M i i I t I I I III i LOT 2, BLOCK B. RAVENAUx NILAGE I \OL. 3BB-213. PC. 3t� PRLC.T. �SP1 (LUD-CFFlCE/COM9) L , t i I i I I I 1 I I i 1. I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I i 9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — PHASE B o --r------------------ PHASE 1 r » ,Y n' n' L Lt T. ,r 4 w • L"-TS !Ll BARYON HOUSE # I i I I ,r r e Li t�1 i ,r = � r � xs• MARGUERITE L MOOL EY VOL 1217Z M 1957. D.RLCT. AG (LUO-RESOENTIAL) DBL FACED B' HEIGHT STOCKADE FENCE A ACCM :1 \ 1 1T BARTON HOUSE #2PIUW mm 7 .G x 24' FIRE LANE i O _ y _co :,.rt. -- G _0 I yr M STOLXAOE FENCE ..L\ (TYP.) e 2. ® ® PROP AG ®® IR6 i OI I II Y p OC Y +35 n I i — — -t= s,at C ACCM LA.Tva --a= 711 cow- ►wt - - 3 i24' FIRE LANE ---------------- DBL FACED 6' HEIGHT STOCKADE FENCE WA.UAM VL RUCXVR rK 2ENA RUCXER TRUSTEES VALUAM W. RUCKER R 204A RUCKER FAMILY TRUST VOL 12591, PG, 2263 O•R.LC.T. AG (LUO-RESDENTIAL) 1w 1� 3 � tl 0 IJ O N �+ • 1 1 tl tl tl VS Fit OWNER: UNCOMMON CARE. INC. ROBERT MONTGOMERY 3808 BIG HORN TRAIL PLANO. TEXAS 75075 GRAPHIC SCALE. 1 IN : 20 FT 00 0 J. 46 LOCATION MAP 114 SUBJECT Q[PROPERTY y� NoIMO �31 O 111Ib11pAl n rweK W SOUTHLAKE BLVD. I LOT 2-R, BLOCK A-80 PECK ADDITION VOL 388-17B, PG 50 P.R.T.C.T. COMM SERVICE (LUD-PUBUC/SEMI-PUBLIC) I ' RELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN FOR SP1-01—PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES (ALZHEIMER'S) ZONING REQUEST BARTON HOUSE UNCOMMON CARE, INC. 1 AN ASSISTED LIVING ALZHEIMER'S CARE FACIUTY PROPOSED LOT 15 T.M. HOOD 1 706 ADDITION 1 LOT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED OCTOBER 2Z 1996 LSLandCon Inc. ErQkw rs • BLlrMors • Pkrswe xa P.,tre. o-. BAD ea Pan r.w T.., T00! A00 ►A Ba CQiO, F'aA 10m0\ Tern 7MbOM on 086.6006 FAA 9XF1 sm"m FEUD NOV.. �988 / �\ LOT 1. BLOCK IL \ RA\ENAUx %*DACE \G.- 356-213. PC. 31. PRLCT. 01-0FFICE (LUO-OFFKXjtOMM) I- - - - - - - - aN 1 .r�3► I a _ -' �•""'T�G.-_ a a a a ,ems \ - - 90'Oa a �.OT ; a - - - -- J I � / I / I / I / I , I I I 1 I jl ;I I •I �I 1 �1 I I 1 n 1 I I I I I i I i I 1 t LOT 2, BLOC( B. I RAVENAUX VILLAGE . 1 VOL 368-213. PG. U P.R.LC.T. SPt (LUO-OMCE/COMB ) I { O O I I I I I I I 1 1 ` +! I I 1 1 i 1 1 1 I _ v KU, s- am 12, RACK{OlRT -r' 7-3 T r, 1 't: 4-e KACKN30Y 3-1 ar 2-r MAcKsmT b• •ECAM `I {- CEDAA 2e OCC- Ir 2-6* RACKOMI MARGUERITE E. WOOLLEY VOL. 12172. PG. 1957. O.R.T.C.T. AG (LUD.RESIOENTIAL) r CEDAR r AECA { /�•; i V G 31 x �r hACMBtI{n r{ PECAR 3- RApIBERItr .- 111EE {- �ACRBOMT (y�' 3-r MU d- { r RACKBKRRI ���I_�Z\f IIJ� 3-s- RAcKomr 3-S- NACMBKRRY » w ,'\I, Oucl— s- .uOgpety i r Tm j 2-r MACKBKRRT u' KCAw B- 'ECAR Ec- tl: 2-1{- 24' OAK 0" r ae ' Olfi 01�1[1�Mr 8 � T I •� I N I GRAPHIC $CAI 1 IN - 20 FT a s a be Z I LOT 2-R. BLOCK A-W PECK ADOITION VOL. 3"-176. PG. 30 P.R.T.C.T. CONK SERVICE (LUD-PUBUC/SE4I-PUBLIC) 1 yY-14q EXISTING TREE SURVEY .T .r.a SITE PLAN FOR SP1-01—PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES (ALZHEIMERS) ZONING REQUEST BARTON HOUSE 1 UNCOMMON CARE, INC. �cv.w -K,//r+r"(, EMSr. pMIT*AY 4 rAWAN A BUCKER t ZENA RUCKER. TRUSTEYS M1WAM W. RUCKER ! ZENA RUCKER FAMLT TRUST g A VOL 12591. PG. 2263 D.R.T.C.T. AG (LUO-RESIDENTIAL) I pest. pewAY DaST omwwAY AN ASSISTED LIVING ALZHEIMER'S CARE FACILITY PROPOSED LOT 15 T.Y. HOOD f 706 ADDITION 1 LOT CITY OF SOUTKA(E. TARRANT COUNTY. TEAS PREPARED OCT080 22. 1998 ONMER: UNCOMMON CARE. INC. LO L a n d C o n Inc. ROBERT MONTGOMERY `IN.pMs 3808 BIG HORN TRAIL �ov' BUrM PUW O. TEXAS 75075 2w P.rwrw or. owes /A vm 10080. M 9kr9LTr4N91fd0 a°'�°.p. 0V 2 31998 mm 4 oA1- O• Y40M rEI I LOT I. 8LooC B. 32 - Nll STI~ HOLLY RAVENAU% VR.LACE VOL, 366-213. PC. 31. T. -- _____- 1 - ptw ow_-_-P.R�T�C Z* CAL ---- _____ - 6 -,:RAP-- MYRTLE - _ _ - _ _ -- E 420.00' I ►,OOor"000C sr ^900, I �p��ll !O ■ CAS CQQO>r.)��w.yn. OpO �-..;. .:O. COO>O.O � "O ■ '�00'•)pO�ai� �•�, �LmoT�111eInMm�rtrlmm;mr,....�1°i � �.,o - �, , :� I III p Cow-�n�0•00-0�0•'�I� � Il�ll�llli` p.,l. .o- �•p. O ■ Ilhi�.I6�!i!iilU�dun11111!Itm�lll - o , ■ �•.?��•�,�16 'o �� is o� ..,.:— ��, �. � �. .� PAW Qua • `tA aaoa �_ i NyU Y'VOL N a �P' SRI i !OE - Jo = i�� .OaLilar jp� ��■ ■ � �1old .Q�It�.7t`.�J.U,9.O.00.0.O:�i���j� �I►��i3��L�`I��)�1�OOG .0!%1`���fla00A ;il��'1�,'��-,I��`� `1/� 1�� 0��0• �. ----- ---- — - - - ---- a�i� - --=� !!, S��MI/n.�i.���►1a00000���/i� �� ��i1\`'w.l n1c, - AealA 1 OA1c 401P STD coI 41 - ow. Euw= I," CmLp STEM. G?64" ci J m Li J a Q 2 U Ld H H G: 0 z �u SoLr STEEL p.wHL 1i - — — , - I I 1 I I 1 UNCOMMON CARE DM S awtra OF I AS HWY. 46 1 a L,v°1 O A E" I N 4-4 4-4 C w R.rystrotlon ♦��E OF ►, b � f f Y 1Vrt.Y O Nw10 JDT 11.09.98 Wo.n Oat. W W EL D Q TOV i Lu z i- o= OC mo M X Y �Q 0 sn..t rn. 0. q LANDSCAPE PLAN RECD NOV 2 19JI Sh.R N. �rl'a'ild ,lase Lr 0t1L .OLC CH cswrem 4OWCAr Po1L4ATICat T66T rCA 9 4. Trm wt rltoce.RAVG a16r.Iat,eL rAsuc, ♦ aeR ... r OIp / "Does for Granw 241K rG. Aocwnow . 6PIOrs6 rh m � 14NIM 1010 A10 tner. CANOPY TREE INSTALLATION A NOT TO SCALE LANT MATERIAL LIST @)ORNAMENTAL TREE INSTALLATION NOT TO SCJVF a2VNfJl 11»! OJWK I 4S IEIbIT aPl l/O ! GPPOIT! AGOI IALNAIW 2 r YAW a'N• Py- PGL pRAWAED, s6ntL MAMW .1-AMM PWZ CAL rcNAPet 6ROrM 49MC-'S CUV10o60 OKLA O ♦ 11w6RANNm l+tl,L ftFAaw/ RC" CL. COL 6ROMl C46 L6 PLOR"A S T ?AY $•»' PA- AML OR/•NA ID bh§Lr. V%00 r/ 0�06110i0D GN 4WAret 61R0.6a FNc IER OA4 SAVAN•WI ! T T/6• TN' I-AML GPAWAW b"LL?"ont/ lAVA1.4AN NOLLT CAL RAPC! CO6 K tRQ 1rs4 tA66MTRalTM ►MRE Ita•T C^ w r Tro r- 1LLL r6L 111 X . KLTL RR7CItT� C.'" -MILE l mer GAL C4WA60t 6ROYN 1-M tAe0n1ROClA 6"rJl wm •JNr • r Tro !..• w• . re" vpAw-o D. "L% ml63otr/ cRA,e t•rR,l: aeA•t Wr u.L r -ex 6wc•« 51•s.L P,•L P.A CLOT,- 3 r SAP 4'H y ►4- POLL 6RAlzC s-dtt 40tw T/ swN Pt! CA. CP Al" 6ROPK 51Ras CERRAL LEAOCR MMU$ 5w r r 111. 671 rL. f6LL 6RAItlm. 90"A. "Acwr It9 OAK GAL C l'"t- L2Avm C01RA 616oP 'A%OgM 06Mr 1 •• OAY 6Yr PAL .'GL SiAKJm. aP•ILL a1Rc r 6ALD GTPIRa6 GAL C✓?tllAl lEAOoI WWA6M 61tOPM ' LL GRA>De'0.M 6 •• OAY 6'T NL/BLSW1rJ®. 5-044s PY 4wm CLw CAL I GORRnt LgAMK CP-A 6RIL�w AmIA 61Wp4GRA TRAKAIVBGff so S 2w/zr WAS• NJ-0% r 60•OG AmN rm-mCm .Vacw 6- ORTO►iWSItla4L6 49 1 w6A6' WAW RLLPLAW 24-OL. low row 6+L nAew6N/! PHr06 TRAnA.or a-MA4w6 r 3 SAL 22'f2•' M'N• naL PLANT !r/ OG .fPtl•IseA NAG11pPIRLLA Slam rbelSA• 25 ! 22'/N• 1lreR-CA 6K PL-VV w 6 S-W Ord P!a 5A AAo •Cs PEA.f 1o•A 11 MAMPA IMWIll-CLIA 6 a 2r/24' W W ELL "-AAr 4r OC. OAK LeAr N VRM WA s+L P1,- N - SNRmOlO r,t 6,RK Aq - P r .oa6 asl C~^ 1!n10nof ItANA K10 a 2tT/2r N-/.(r PILL PLARr 96. OG V . cAmm H r fAL LGL CoRN1fA r.Ntm6A' M a W,20' r'/Jo• RA-- KA11f !T 04. CARLal1. NCLLY ek LU P. IUL Sm%" 1Cq 1 92-~ 22'/24- ILL -KART ♦2. OL. Vm STM1 " LY ML jkw"%S .loftz TA is PRYrl or -LEY 42 2 trA,• 6•14' RL' nLA11f 24' OG O P•Ift 4.RZx SAL 11A1gM peal wwT TA $qc 1 64r 51 ! r'OP 127A•' PAL PLANf 24' OG IwpIA lL.0m eAr SAL RAPKtOIS 601C L-iPR41S so S 20'-]7 2 W-2r ftl- PLMf w OG 6L1AM NN1111pO1 -1"0* RAPuw SAL t6a6'RCpr/. 6TMVN11eRA ! S 22•/24• r•ro• F%L ANT PL4r OG CLET6RA 44PCI6GA 6At ..'s •A--LN rOC. ,eAeon.L cola ror LPX- H15CARI xVot1' •JAPR00► m I 6'AO• 6-AC' kL PLANT W OG L.PUCrC xvertr !4♦#oCr SAL tRAGd. Pl A6urIGlM a6w •' •'+• .•r nLL PLANT a• or../l1W1 -imm 1•-'1Rr POf 610 PRIFARAr1 23250 IaOt TO W"aGAPe FLAW" Valft 1 IMIto.00o .m" R1pta014r A►PLOvm LONE aim mMr 260LF 1b . 4• 6R0l,gAGIC1 ser TOP me WA A60,E PR'P4!D 49AM roW mrM 263E 4' 1L10GV 6DOQ OOwtOI aCT TOP 01! P1:11 A60`{ P6Lme0 6RAm PE/L 61V YM 44ot/ 7 va r,K 1W4-m v"L-0 olrm FLmR rA&'W SUM%WY CHART - DUP74C TREES PNA,W 1. E.VST616 fltL3 PMAx It, EXLSTMO TREES 6' - CEDAR - I 24• - PECAN - 2 4' - PECAN - I 6' - MACICOERRY - 2 24' - PECAN - I 4' - TR$ A6 -I VFW) - 1 10' - HACIaOLRY - I I..-- PECAN - 1 6' - 1LACKEERRY . 4 S' - MACKEERI r - 9 S" - HAC ZCPW - 4 SO' - PECAN'I p• - NACICEERRY - 9 6- - C9AR - 1 TREE' t1r6umnrtm) - 6 10' - NALKDERIve - I . 26' - PINE - 1 6• - PECAN :2 ,0• - C WA Pt - I 6• EC - PAN 1 24- - PiW- - 2 12- - MACKECVi'f - I -, 96• . rime - 1 4• • NAG6aCVR.Y - I 14' - PINE - 1 14' PARE I 6•-NIMOA-i 'F1 S'-ELM-2 4• ' TREE &Odoc iTwgw) - 1 4- - W14 -I 6' - PECAN - 1 12' - WGICSCRRY - I IS- - HACKEERRY - I TREE CREDIT CALC A.ATIOlb: 7S - TRC''3 • 6' TO 12• CiAL;FE.R a iS ACCENT TREES CREDIT 14 - TWN5 R I2' CALIPER OR y1tEATE! a 43 CANOPY TREES CP1ID? RAWMY CHART - MXFER YARD TO. AHC'P'f 9JNRUE6 ro"CC scitesIlN LOCATION 6El6TN 0fl1-TYPE Tr4ms iRff3 ICserTR9ATOVI4. NORTH KEC2NRE0 919LF 6•- A 4 6 82 mom tO PROVm simp W - A O- O• 92 D' P@rleAll EAST LF I& - E 9 6 29 m m PROVIDED 2:ILP la - E O• 0• 2, NONE - SOUTH R&URVED 42OLP 10' - N M 24 4p WPENCE Pr,"Om 42OLr W - rI 0• rl 46 6. 6 6• PCWXA 000 TEST RECLIRED 91W S - A S 6 24 NL*C PROYlOCD 919L1 10' - A S 0- 24 6' PENCC/W20D CJL-MITS V9W IN CALCILATtON9. A NORTH - II CA 40PY TREE AND 6 ACCENT TREG CRmfr TAKEN FOR GC TIREC:S E. PA'.T - IS CANOPY TREE AND T ACCENT TREE CREDIT TAKEN POR EX TRR'1 C. SOUfM - 12 CANOPY TREE AND 1 ACCENT TREE CREDIT TAKEN FOR EX TREES D. PEST - 6 ACCENT TREE CREDIT TAKEN FOR EX TREES S ,WJAARY CHART - MUM LANDSCAPE L AkXn4 APE R Or AREA IN CANOPY ACCENT G"NA516 MAW C WXK AREA (50- PTJ FRONT OR 910C TREe5 TRr 5 ISO. FTJ REC61Rm TJ1261 1s% 12 24 L22 TDM PROVIDED 65.SSS61 15% SI 26 440 2%ma OJtmIT•S UOCD IN CALCLLATIO/L'A A. TOTAL MALOINS $O. FT. • 16.24TMZ.61246f ■ kM OWYL LAW9CAPW6) • T912M. ItATLQ THAW M 4' f•OMM /bMi YARD 0 0� +� �r1 SHRUS/GROUNDCOVER INSTALLATION TO SCALE ROC® FOIE P1ff IRQ PRAPRr r1011N�! I�OR - APPRpVµ 0 WOlfJAr ARGwiCGT. D TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE LANDSCAPE NOTES: ,AtRu.. GaR..4> e.v..1..�...... ,,,••••,c.ww. vr•»roYer•..1.,.AU»..Ra 1r..n..6 �r,s�e.n....a 66�RO u.R,e.rR tePwwel RwL � 1asP6aa Ps w /asow,llo. RP. PIIRI mre.owaR.»R,Prs ie Puo..r.. n..... Rna..Ivr _�lM1Nl RNR V�1iNONtfY M��Mt•Y®. 4avPcv I«r RPaw w raa Rw� ww r RRP.r 6nIrR • waA► �'r f♦.�PG4R R Rerar4l4 Pv.LL au.N•a w1>w..wr �� .00l�rAaerrPu w�rRRRlwr n.wsuPw lelwor .� J ar IRRw v P�•P ra16.R.w u �wLAn111 lRnaa Mo.O farRtr]4bvL iACR wr deRIRCU�Mf.Rpl RR1pP�1Ol C0OI. 'erwlel6w NlMOIc/Pt APw9cr �f. Pn+mR6 wiwa �lr�v.<N»• fs.RRRaarralwlPw t•4•Nrea faf�i6RR�s�NP1�a.R�MRO R..��� o.saN ♦11nwARr6r6wv PRII6>„PP♦Pr614,1 welYai+.w •ARI1rL1sp�Pw ♦rPL A� 'Arar•.w wuwwrw wuµR.� �� � R1�iwtbp Rl�iw s•.w ,m~i �a• Revs w a.r r RA•.+a...r. N a a1.. P•• m r.ea �. •. oP �r��s111P1 NL11C w�.NP•P�w�PPr•Or1s�IlMltr - .ie r'.w'sieitwr�a ti4N ♦ IYl11M �4RC�PP� Rp AR. TPP4NW OIAPM 6L�w6 NPlsua RMl♦aPw.ONf4R. wR.RNPtMPtstrswL Pf 6o/uw GLOM RwtRMARPL IrOLL PRnR660. NwfararGRrllrRa ALLIL146,IP CMI�i �MpeV�.MOfYro10� w PPi40rt.r RRfPtweR� _� rI10oLM b1RN.TwN.RlK. RR�4NIlY KLLP1 s N��af4q r41AOSRAIsr1> Aw INN R/Powl♦RWL�MPr,OwLAr.[M APR41tG1. �1e1r _ A1...`�eNwlLww...Pv...R•r M11.'IptM N4PwMGURR wIL wr Zr w1Nr4ewtRR lRPA1P01L 111.Ps�ri�f � frM1Oila' A.OR RCWRR wt+raml6cs a� osuRro N.Pi iv. wr a.iorLRNl�ilw�ir�a wP.•14w»R.6>.AINIMIgRMw1..a x s•RI Rwa Lww�: NW,.i� N�.A.+RP i»L ,~ P.�1.acw1°I�w.IR��r1�ot/..I�a �: mom. n.�i ».�..00•ow 11PpfMR•A2PRGf I�7•YR/r,. II�IMP .ILR.w.w�1a,RN.......R.....r.sao..w..o..rn..u. fOP16OrAfII1MQw NO,OL M'�I'Y (4wPIL�}l /sortPR11MRP.NO Alb LASPVP,oR �••.0 MtrI10LM.1 P•,[Pmw►aPR SIMIYI» "'r...,,anw.P...r`•'..va ��.r'eroR.ri�vw.�. w..... (alfllv�A[01 i rlr 4s�wws w.fl�i.lr�MYve�s�'.. °feV•w`r/Y �sr r~i .=.-r.sb ows sRr o.wrr. wwa.w 11 IJrN•JD11 UM CARE UM i CAPITAL aF TECA.S ANY. Ton r 11 0 �A :cl �n Ps4 V m a o r, 4-4 -4 4 n gv q .m CIS c�4 R6ry-6tmtlm "e't' RntRr a TwRtR ass 1 0T 11.09.98 Warn OaN Sheet Me gg-lp LANDSCAPE DETAILS REC@ NOV .2 319 Sheet M6. vxiity map sad.: r - iw 6 56 100 200 300 Owler Fred lays• IO *Sin D. Tate Ave. TX (SD) 48(-35i6 76051 sZ-t Drn• Sou kkAL TX 76092 (8) 48F•7654 Strveyor Roger W. Hat R.P.L.S. Area Suryyy'Fn4g 6__ 102 W. Traomwi St. Foes Werth TX 76140 (80 293-5684 Encikxier JoFn E Levitt. Ptt EE Southidc• TX 7609Vim 726 Commerce St. Svit• 104 00 488-3W fMt~•ed b go t laeeifr to lamb* arrsiseM■ Date: L I IE TA{LE LINE WEARING DISTANCE L I i W39-43-V 149.09' L 2 S 00.07'24'S 157.S7' L 3 N 01'36'23'E 70.22' L 4 S 0707'24'S - 4.21' Legmnd w SM (emomp a Ph Found N othr oa,rrs we woriced,ocpse+orked 'AREA 4- Bowie Cain Sq•gTHRID E LAK S.1 P �q Lot i. S' � 2 I A. A. FREEMAN NO. 522 ADDITION SrS3C a b ( • t A . Cabinet A. Slide 1461 �e t A. -,� nr UE..� o wet eo .o z� 0 _,5 R 1 W ��O O o� 0 4 4k l S. UE N O' U 5 5 �Y EsstL r: 7Ws5 SF. „ 4. �e2.66 _ �30 Comm Aoowes d. Ult Ent e SF, h _ 7029 SF. }-- p \ p' U.E. F, O 90 g( 92 I 93 94 95 SOU HRIDGE LAKES. Ph ns IV S.cti n 0n• Sabine A. S ids I 3I I 89 Concha cf. Pecos�---- —�--------- Notes: L Alcorner lot ow e n and mpltan mist trioncisc in occardanca eiTh the City abcgision arckcnce 2 The Gry of Sou+"+ r wrves the right to ro9r• siius firth floor alevch" on dry lot contoi ed eithn +in addtiol► The MWWN elevcAlons JxM are boe.d at the rod ctrred nforod- adr$le at t4ve time the plot it f6d and soy be abj.d to dxrcyL Addbord lots ththsh other e o« oo may deo floor a to 3 Swi g o w=of. lot eiliil >}rs addlbn s»t.. ad is a viok of State Lae ad Otyby W.. bmd uidis P to Cf" and tidkl3tg of unto and Awwwd b li• c" 000" Doe: ff 6uE I *�� 98 SOU7 GE LAitf 96 C binn t A. I A tLbo 1 V I I - _ _ . . ... �-•.. -. .. � fay .: .� -_ • � s ''+'.'�. Oww's Dedtc 0m D/%reemta STATE CF lEl(AS ) - COLNTY OF TANK WT I F7 aRYEY��M6 N� El9t J d d S% 1 td a ire Td am di i rrl *'1� A A A. i AM 4Wa. per S a adad &- "W ►g M. ear. Tsrof Cwill� TOM BEcitlq of • 5/! Fee pi toad IN tlr wed v d Saatietdse L.Jra P�for to want eon Wr Wmwl cram d .aW tear drated i Yob. 4937. Pwge amd far �+• esi-1 , mmr or Lot I Frei 5. SOUMOCr= LNE& Phme VL wordy 1. fir Plat Won i Cabinet A Side VII& Ple Pam Torat C 01yt Toot TF@CE Sa/e 00 dgee 39 ir.a 43 neaawdt Sat a davoa. of "M feet Joy dr end be d S Ldoe Pommy in an ad. food fr a a* pat i to want Ir d add trod iraiwd i Vabow 4937. 53Q THRXE Sale 00 J;E tp ir« 24 sworA Set a dasaee d 67-V tea evulb" day 00 ant b of Sereiye Leine Faiml se as VI ha pi food fir to weetYwt aanr d am tad irarted Y VA- 4937. Sn and for tl. vtinat darer of u 9%"l WHOM LAKEL phnee 14 roai to fir Ili r6011 i C a A Sole W&t Plc hoof Taeat Cimttt Ts 1Feam Sew*. 49 &Y.a 15 .ire 33 MM& stet a drone of =.Is f a Joey fir soele 1.►rt aid tad demoted In Vdar 4937,peye M ad * fr .sole 4e d • add tea deeot i Vain 4 per 7V. to • 5N ode pY feoii b now 4. d Pytided TtENE Nr1e OD OI wee" 00 wcaedm fiat • dmtaoe of 23M feet J� #0 •ar be Of P.ytommiw !toad ow 5/i ►s Pi food Y t}n word+ ie d end twd doat.d i Valium OW. pwym 7iT Tt6JC5 Nr�v r9 a sin•.m 40 eeoawdb Eat 4 dawn. d 54006 fed to a Syr' Fa pY fad for *0 morlWent awrer of dd feet drated IN Vabe 6907. Pale 7O. and Is *a eat be Of 00 tut dreried IN Vaima 4W. Pop 530 TH34C£ Nriv at dgwe 36 .idea 23 rasi Eat a dmeosae d 7= feet a1oo to wrt 4e d .id tad dnerb.d i Vat. 53t1 b • 5/6' iaa pi fowmd eJe a'4 Halal 3EYCv far fir .a ow �2 Ld lR &A S 90UT 40M LAM Plre %% e0mr&9 to **-Me cow i Hofer A 96& 5 to ttn pW -a= E<iN J(p 91 .dd fixated tad —aiig 6A67 aaw•etof egWAtbe WA in d odd Nast Tt� KHM ALL KN 9Y MIRSE PFIEENT* Tid Fred .btom aSesda 1,byo� do (rr.6r apt l i p1e >>r hereimboe. dneat.d p��p.yy a Ld de. oa 6. 7. i 6, A A FR63M Net 322 ADOf1pN a AdOae' b d+m City d Saddde. Tariat Camty Tan ad a.h by drdoa. ad saea,.omeem i+eas three to 1r pbi2. new ales olrni. ted. vs.. y hind at sm#" ► Tuaa to lr day of � Fr.d Joyce STATE OF TEXAS ) CMINTY OF TAXW9 ) 1iff-0IE !£ fir odrr7wd adF only. an h day 9 mt or goo g ihwt d'od�aoid1jed k ;.a M it w to aha.w .ow. ae ad i tic firm .RYel a. !d lryto 6. ir+ ...oa.d ,. o. for f,. prpo... ad eo.idrdir a{rae.d -- _ Ciw aedr y hand a.d wed of M. l i fir day of l9 Notvy pAk Cohan e9kew SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION Tire in to antiiy shot I. Roqwr M. Fort a pq�aced Professional La1d Surveyor of the Stale of Twzas hovig Platted tfr dewy. rbdvmion from on oetud sa'v" y on Ce gaud dad that d lot comers. ad 0 je Ponta W Ponta of aorta 4A be Prnparly vice on *in gw+d ad that - W .r ry n .wy .ad. br .. or IM N 0 V RogI If. Hort RPLS. Taolot R•gimVO" Nix 44" 9�•l5l Plat Showing Lots 5. 6. & 7. A. A. Freeman No. 522 Addition Being6.967 acres of Imd in the Al A Fromm Swey Ab&oct Ux6er 522. to the City of SoOhkke. Tarrant Comfy. Texas. Thee Lou 1998 � 1 2a % TFfs PLAT fiID N CAB►ET iDE ARIA DATE Iti ! lam! fa � tEI tltliM4 L: _ uwars t CAM/ „cFaal +*ft A PRM CAA I14M E-tM" sw 1OT 0 O OfAc i *Pjn# e+Pwd I tOT! ROR C1 /�.A.I�.�... �.�.A�,4, wmmmp.w. CA/t!AR T RQO ►RTL.T. �/ ptTc.L TO I! � CQiMM Pot O01w / lOmw 1VOct i� p IN 00W4v a Gehl MT2 "oe.r, w�ca+nw LOT W a4M I RAM I /ONIMM PNW 1 Pet g11d 1 IG+ T ARat CMKT A"w IJtfW. a gO j ucaPPn.v rwTueK s..s � •va COMIRI t Ie+oPa c A►IPna1 Fl t CM 9TAIO►10! MMOX!DO-DN,TAWl TO CL C►CO O" CARROL AVENUE 11016 AYMT CI MY t KMCIAW PIPPIN, WAY P6 TO K CAIMOL A%94& ROM I I411COW NACTgl ISITE DATA SUMMARY CHART 1OMIOa D/ vCL IM G% DRTL.T. SITE PLAN xx&r.-zww L.OT13 BLOCK:I PN ORM41 PLACE, PH1# 2 No" FROM, LOT, 2 GLOM I PA40RAtM PLACE PRELMlHRY PLAT SOVM.A =ARRANT COMMEXAS r VICINITY MAP 1 b I I I _ i � h ' zN I 1 O I J g8-152 Z Z PEC) NOV 23199 "S I Tm FOR PANORAMA PLACE, PHASE 2 GARROL AV&4.0 sovNI.AIQ, Tax" TARRAW C.0.4rY OICiRP 5-00 COLD DALLAs TCexAVBALL75,JAA II00 H TlLC•. �'I1-•1�-SOS+ PAX@' 47 2-aM-ON2 AR1.IC.ANTP rANORAMA PROPCOMMS, INC. !01 N.N. G�ARItOt.L AVE. TIN. 1i1 TrA7R. MLjte-OlM A& ®u1moss Naomi EVA CWct�wa • %R A 17 • FAX 817-251— AGIt�b s1�T Cam• A-12Agb- Q s�� BLDG. (A) EAST ELEVATION (WEST ELEVATION OPPOSITE) f 1 oup. BLDG. (A) NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION OPPOSITE ) ICALe. W" 1-Or Y BLDG. (5) EAST ELEVATION (WEST ELEVATION OPPOSITE) �'� VWV. BLDG. (B) NORTH ELEVATION G$-IrJZ (SouTH ELEVATION OPPOSITE) 'r ECD Nov 2 31998 POR PANORAMA PLACE, PHA5E 2 CARROL AV01" SOVTHLAKE,TEXAS NOTE: TAR1tANT COWTY omet. J w COLE 0"tWTIONAL WLIWM%* AM DITQCW To CC US= To WOW 1/' eulLaw PAGADCO. 5001 • RINO VALLEY R0.,81100 W DALLAS TEXAS 'M244 TELE•. rf; -4O'YI PAXN:-M2-444-*"2 APPLICANT. PANORAMA PROPERMS, INC. SO$ N. GAR!lOLL AVt:. lOVTFt.A1GC, TLXA9 'f6C12 T�LC�. t��Rjj-4��D0-n00�}Oy��AX•: Ort-+YDD-OOM - 1E�SU6• UA 70A2197 OC�A• • FAX 817—Zl—MM !I ACRCB f�f GA>X • 2A�98-A-2 Q�� NXDCAST CORM Of Mr. beat N*4v. A-U6 SO 0 30 100 ISO MAP" AWC - MZ7 AN•,, f' � 34 9YCTT cescm6m 76 CA me WL weir L Pft" 10MAt 2T34 PAN 304 OJ.rLL 31e SMM 000 (9TAMNG SWRCLM EAST 206.50' EAST - rr sJsrmr BLOCK 1 t0 ¢g CF1 rf ARAAUAT a v.L . t?"t- 2sx. rTt RARaar u r*"vA A. 91D0 41s4 uErtt `�' A o rALrtr. A as,srs sae MOO' ee��,, I . " I Iz fLlim�^➢mfLt` M moo w . - eow00 r A R ul is i S@S@S I rrl rr, fwAa g -4 rRs s:W. z s z u I x TRSLr1C u[ - n.a A' 8709'41' t oo. T .i7o' f 00' 120.0[r r vmmr RL ��1p 7pQp' itit LC S 11'49' W Wr is LA PAIAMA COURT a 80'44.4 1t Al' AN/7T ILCJIS 10TClC fROJlf , CCS=eA,WXUrT - - S6Yas to +�11a0o 7/ / - �2r i4 l 61.7Y 'v _-- -- r -_- I ,,t•1• ,? T 33.K ,f ARLM=CASRYIAIf IJ 2S 61RD10 lrt CA4 A A1DC 2-53 - Il.TLT. - /QQ .a. e...e.N. 176IIVITY o" NM AIIRO.m OrT INV " C06M390O av/ r t z s1cpaARY Approm Off T.OUN.L ..3m an slawrw OATc F �l trlL r,. - pso0 N If ellLlr7 LA.sS= - SR t, � � a 8 W W(6 W LA r/lGW A 1TlJ0C Jt64 r.ILLCT. 1f OIffJfT ILSlItTlYr ---- ---- soft fluem VMLM C 64 70. ►AGC 434 TL7. TMCT TO 106W O. 6N0[li AW '.TL RtECLOA a 6."m KMut 9e67. Rkt 2m. DJU.C.t Harm. W tar H ras AOO!rN 9W SC MLOM W41.M AC=3 OM SOVTN CAMOM SOLO. M arY Of SOVTICAT I UND Dt Ri01R 70 K01AM5 IRY.M M94M BOOR QAVArOd 01. ANr IAr OWD&M .RIM T1.S AOMTOL IW UNWA OAWNdd *** AFK /ASm ON M RMT OM" wmmum AtM AT rK 04 w HAT a rsz0 MC t K SYTIGT 10 CWCL AOOmmL LOM OMAM TWO T1tOK BOOK btY ALSO K VAJ= m 1 F"*= NAM SRI" A rOR M Of M 10r r Tq #aXMN OfWMS AND W W5 0 A MOUTON Or SM MR MO Cp Wo. ,.= .0 9 SMICT 70 FM AM I f1.+0.A.10 Of VTLIM Me 9Rly0 Au iOf GOB M ARC ve . CWM 2MM s00s TUWM ,b.( V" le eouc u.m .Otm 60c..L s ova'o a r NO 2R I tR 1 7 ,r oraJfr I ! V n I Y t I o :j O 1Y 0 O N � 1 I 10• LL x Tn M70itUa OttM 2r aL O S/6' srm ROD (um" w E OmRAT+O. stat Of TOtAs COURT or %Mrwt TttffAt. Law a Wlem. J.YR V.a.... ..R•r M M S.a,pl M nNRYSrrL; b eal' atrvktl .p. 1*" Oy b 1 4 ,.i11 1 Y V.EAtN 12005. ►.V. 7SO a M ewr RsdA "a . W. Taw, Y M ..r .rw d • M • lyd .ttr.. b Mar IORONT L. ft. Mrn.t tr 05 w. .av .1 S S M /T itw 1, V.Th. t.... d L. ►.IR... w bbM A. M Cp * of T Ad C *L Tww .. nesCN b Ctll.a A. SY. 2s6a d M Ita Rv... TwrR4 i C.•..A 7."c NCR, rMONFORL IOM ALL .Of 91 TCC PRONE .. Ma. Ld of t. ►d..,. J.M %V"% b R 11Nw0t M w6N.I4,K b M' wtbrb.e -WA. e... TN..4 .ebt I* wd eolrr••s M Y".Y..ARn er.9.0 vr•W WT S4 BUM 1, T4 MIS] Or to MbN w AORM. 1. M OR d S.aNa4 iv:st C. % T- r W 1 w h•tll' C..ed. M A9+�Y"d-. J M .w.inNR. Mew Wnw 1. M N.S.Y. w..M.w MlNnir. Ratl >W MR Mr Aa dlrr M wwww .a bww a swaa. T-K 0wvq tree. tTw M ..r d 1D.t { Jd, m6d- . tw' r r..w faw ( L. F- J.M v . SLR 01 TOO& COIMir Of T/iIVWR: BU*K e., w .tlNdpM wRbb. a w. d.a O.ww•.tr tie.v.4 M Mali-. u.rgpirq P~ d TM tdr a L. Ida.. 4" J.M VW*- 1 r r b M M .arr .Y....w,. .4 r..P* u..%n L M Odn. %s W r wi M asewtl M ...e /r M Ivpw. W epwrC a.0 Y M aq.oR, S,r.t...dK .•I w M wl M Mtl a W Jdnt tMDI.. p m MOOR K M,O AM tCAL Or OR1CC .rt 1M. M - e., a is_ ^teats, Item w M Star. a T ft N w �+ a� PLAT REVISION LOT 9R, BLOCK 1, © THE LAKES OF LA PALOMA AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH AEE. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS rr ►tL a at s 6 i 1.376T 1C225 OW f1S THE O.T. QMIR SORT[[. LLTtLCT Te. 6e5 Berm MI"M 7ffi I.ttiS W V TA[O1tA RUNG A ACCWDp4 TO TIM TL09 Of LT ASS AND 11L Rta9.Rw BLOCK1. CANOW A. 9IDL 25SA. ►2 SQUW MVf A7 NORn4W= COA1+01 Of WOO AT O M OML DR : 1220'..CSr Or CAFM /L O.C.a>aN - W0.76 fteT APRII. 1998 1 LOT e0aUt.tt TMOARY SCWt WW= IS):. WRIN Of M SMOWAS7 WO Of Maimf LOT. F12MObr - 611]0 iLFr S e !fi (EG'p NOV 2 31998 rAteT.or tore "Case No. K 19 tR00004M AS 0.0 AUMORM WI9MOCONO Cf M SafOCM iRl1IY C01PA1t3. IOrt7/ Ov'R£sl W oatcsoN m x AWOUAO/f a Tt tf6[LOfis to ItOtm w - - T174 rti v. SAO fJSE?O/,s ot0 IR[YtOUAr KCOADfD N u�a A 9 0c ns. v tllC 1Mt RtfL fp4 rA1MM/i o0urr , Ti7Vd Ns rw 0 RID M GtA.ta a" urm TC" MNFs aterne M-o"m Q=w 000rOMNE. MC. SK..M PN-= 1..t T111L• 9090. /tafim N.C. TM 1. Dam W. Yyw.. a R.¢a.r.e foot- " L:: Sun.q.r d D+a++.e M .Dew uGe1.l.bn Irvin an acted wr..y m M MO,•d eM UNt d TM mm. w0 eo .n. engb pant. One p­u d curr. OWN 0. W-W, tt erEW on V . S an4 e W Vet tew 0.t «avvtdy r.r.....t, vet N...r n+ae. u%dw m, tArr-A.W . aMtR�M1COr0t: M LWM OF to rM4%A JOW YO(rUPC CTC COffTM, Or- LONE SWt CA om~ 17130 IL D'ttAe ►I,TRat 7rRR 210 Da.K W. /yMs. R/l5 .S6S COU.14 TOtAS 7M44 SOT@ 90m- C214) 71I-$M Whim Niue I196m wa TMJL TWM STltL t- - S0 Nt/0m 5-7-1M6 OwgC S: OAlO OAIL %twee * DAVID C. MC O4.dM WAMM L W-% W_ 5e0 RtEVE.*t ,I.rr, zrrt /1rt Woos T� Surveyors, in IRRO. 1RA3 )ease 517) t77_Tlez 9fiOc . rotro sTm DOD ) DfOOmtm pmxu o7 wr C : ..rm "n Roo own ON M COIIatR 4.. _ 1 tAro 9R�aoe City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, Deputy Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Town Square Status Report • Town Square • Progress continues on the infrastructure and commercial elements of this project. Six buildings are currently under construction. Buildings 1A and 1B have been inspected by Building Inspections and have been released for tenant finish work. Buildings 5A and 5B have had the exterior stucco installed on the rear of the buildings. Brick work on 5B is approximately 98% complete and brick work on 5A is apprroximately 95% complete. These buildings will be available for tenant finish work • in approximately 1 week. Building 4C has had all the exterior sheathing installed, rear - stucco has been applied and brick work has begun. Building 2C has had framing installed and exterior sheathing is being installed. Both buildings have had rough-in mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems installed. Interior framing and sheathing is being constructed. Paving of State Street, Fountain Place and Main Street has taken place. Work on the sidewalks adjacent to the paving is scheduled to begin the week of November 23, 1998. Landscaping is being installed in the parking areas. The Developer has submitted the proposed sign variance documentation to staff for their review. Even though a dedicated work session may need to be scheduled to discuss some of the signage issues, this item has been placed on the December 1, 1998 agenda as a Discussion Item so that issues can be raised prior to any required work session. Tenant work and permits have been issued on Talbot's and Victoria Secret. Plans reviews have been completed on Banana Republic, Bombay Company, Chicos, Corner Bakery, Gap, Gap Kids, Gymboree, Harolds, St..Johns,and-Williams-Sonoma. --- Town Square Status November 25, 1998 Page 2 • Phase I Modification At the start of this project the Developer modified one building on Grand Avenue (Building 5A). This building was originally planned on being a two story, L-shaped building. The Developer had proposed changing this to two buildings with the portion along FM 1709 being a 1 - 1/2 story. The Developer contacted staff on Friday November 20, 1998 and stated that his plans had changed again and that the building along FM 1709 would now be 2 stories and that there would have to be an 8 foot extension built on the east end in order to accommodate access to the second floor.. The extension of this building would impact the planned (and approved) building to the east. In order to accommodate these changes, the Developer will reduce the square footage of the not yet built building to the east so that the total building square footage in this block will not change. Staff has informed the Developer that these changes may constitute a significant change and that this lot may need to go through the entire process of a revised site plan. Staff requests that City Council provide guidance as to the actions and direction to be taken. Attached is a sketch showing the Original Plans, First Revision and Current Proposal. IIII Post Office Square . There is no change from the last report on this phase of the project. Town Hall At the November 17, 1998 City Council meeting the City Manager was authorized to negotiate an agreement for design services with Davis Schwarz. There is an item on the agenda to discuss the progress of these negotiations. I would like to remind Council Members that individual tours of the project site can be arranged by contacting me 1 - 2 days in advance. Work has progressed to the point where a good feel for the layout and aesthetics of the project can be visualized. RJH/rj 0 d:\wd-files\sts\statl2.doc CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Public Works Department JOB �OW'n S$ugre •-l5toc-I . 5' SHEET NO. I OF 667 North Carroll Avenue CALCULATED BY ��—�' 1 4 J% SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092„ DATE ( � Z (817) 481-5581 Ext. 7 i CHECKED BY DATE SCALE I"C /0 0' ,514 2 Atm- 51,.34.4..°.._S SF s+arir.... .. .574SF. 5W• 2 5 ....;r.....� : . . ,...._......... ' , . ,.. . 8,ct43 sF ........ ...... .. .. :........ ...._................ i� .EVti.S ION............� 1 33,4745F"........ .. ..........:.............:........... ............:... ........... :....... 3"r..... :. .... 5 F :.. ..._ ......_ .................... ..... s .. .:..,..2,9 oo ' •............. A 541,7 52,.292.SF PRODUCT 204 1(Soot Sheets)205-1(Padded)IAENEgIae Inc•Groton•Mass.01471.To Order PHONE TOLL FREE I-800-225-6380 r, City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E., Director of Public Works SUBJECT: CIP Status Report Attached is the status report of projects currently included in the City's Capital Improvement Program for 1996-1998. This monthly report is in a narrative format, which describes the ongoing progress of each project. A graphical schedule of each project is also included which shows the current schedule with it's corresponding baseline schedule. These narrative and graphical updates will include the following: 1996-1998 Sewer& Water Infrastructure CIP Projects 1996-1998 Roadway Improvement CIP Projects 1996-1998 Neighborhood Sewer/Street CIP Projects S.H. 114 Reconstruction Projects Miscellaneous Projects RRW/sp Attachment: CIP Report Ll� MONTHLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE 111 December 1998 1996-98 Sewer and Water Infrastructure CIP Projects SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE Project Description: Dove Estates Lift Station &Sanitary Sewer Improvements Discussion: Currently, the Dove Estates subdivision is served with sanitary sewer. This sewer flows to a small treatment facility where it is treated and discharged into Lake Grapevine. This treatment facility is a maintenance problem and requires daily upkeep. In order to abandon the treatment facility, a lift station needs to be constructed so the sewer can be pumped within a force main to the gravity sewer located in Lonesome Dove Estates. The design of this project is complete and the plans have been reviewed by the city. This project was originally proposed and funded for the FY1996-97, but because no improvements to this project can occur until improvements to the lift station at Lonesome Dove Ave. and E. Dove St. occur, this project was delayed and placed in the FY1997-98. The construction of this project will be part of the contract to reconstruct Lake Drive. The estimated design and construction cost is $195,500. 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration AjSlOINID J]FIMIAJMIJIJIAIS!O[NJ D JIFIMIAIMIJJJIAISlOINID JIFIMIAIM!JJJIAISIOIN!D JjFIMIA 56 Dove Estates Sewer 469d + ; : , : : . 57 Cesign 1 131d 100% : 58 Review Plans 35d : ' . 'G . 100% S 59 Obtain Fight of Way Od <> ♦111; ; ! ; . 60 FnaizeFlans 25d ; a : ; ! 10071 . . ! ; : . ; i 61 Advertise 21d 0% , •. . . . , 62 Counci Bid Award 1d : . : a : : . 2119, ; : _ • ' 63 Obtain Contract Documents 15d : . 4 ; 0%; ' 64 — Reconstruction Conference- _id I 65 ___ Canstructicn 90d ':. i ` Project Description: Crossroads Square Sanitary Sewer Discussion: The City budgeted $225,000 in the CIP budget to construct a sanitary sewer line from the existing lift station at Crossroads Square to the existing sewer line at the end of Caddo Lake Drive in the Lakecrest Addition. A portion of this project was approved and funded for the FY1996-97. The original alignment of the sewer was revised due to the developer of the Shady Oaks Retail Center participating with the city. Under this new alignment, the portion of the sewer line from Caddo Lake Drive to the north side of F.M. 1709 was constructed. The remainder of this sewer line is from the entrance to Bicentennial Park to the lift station located at F.M. 1709 and N. White Chapel. With the completion of this section, the existing lift station will be abandoned. The construction plans are complete and have been reviewed by the city. The required easements are now being obtained. • 1 Irr 1997 1998 1999 2000 • ID Task Name Duration FIMIAIMIJ!J1ALSLO!N1D JIFIMfAIM': IJIJIAISIOINJD JIFIMIAIMHIJIAJSIOINID J!FIM!AIMIJIJIAISIO 89 Crossroads Square Sewer 378d i i ! ji, i i ! j !i ! i f ! ! i j i s! 90 Desgn 80d' ' i ( i . 1ooX 1 1 1 ! i i i 1 1 : , . 91 Review Flans 18d' ; 1 . ' , ' 16314 ' : : • i " : 92 Obtain Right of Way 238d i 1-33% 93 ___.Beaize Ibis 3d " ; '1 ; , t10096 : 1 ' : " " : " . 94 Advertise 1 28d ' ;=I' 0% • • : . • " . • • 95 Counci Bid Award 1d ' 0 ' 11 96 Obtain Contract Documents 15d _ . 0 0% 97 AeconstructienConference 1d 0 • • 5: 7. 98 Construction 15d ' 1 ! , " 0% : i Project Description: S 7 Sewer Line Extension Discussion: The S-7 sewer line serves the southeast portion of the city. With the construction of this extension, the city can eliminate the wastewater treatment facility at Bank Place. This sewer line will also serve the commercial and industrial sites located in this portion of the city. The estimated design and construction cost for this project is $1,000,000. The design of this project is complete and the city anticipates construction will occur within the FY1998-99 with developer participation. The city allocated $100,000 for the design costs in the FY1997-98 budget. The remaining $900,000 for the construction of the sewer line will be budgeted in future years in the CIP budget. 1998 1999 2000 2001 ID Task Name Duration D JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAIS OINID J[FjM!AIMJJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIM[JIJIAtSIOIN]D JIFIMIAIMIJIJIA 122 S-7 Sewer Extension 513d i k , . , , . , f ' . . S 124 Review 123 Bans Design 130d 0 : . : : . 15d 10 100%' 125 Obtain Right of Way 150d ' 0%1 " 126 Fena8ze Flans 15d ' " 127 Advertise 21d 1 0% 128 Counci Bid Award _...... id ' 118 129 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ' : ' 0°A 130 Reconstruction Conference id .619; : : ; ; 131 Construction 180d ' ! Project Description: N-5 Sanitary Sewer Line (From FM 1709 to Kimball Ave.) Discussion: This sanitary sewer line will serve the properties located between F.M. 1709 and S.H. 114 from the Wall Street bridge to Kimball Ave. Following the construction of this sewer line, the lift station at Bank Street will be eliminated. The anticipated construction cost for the sanitary sewer appurtenances is $352,000. The engineering will be funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget and the construction is anticipated to take place in the FY1998-99 with developer participation. The engineering has been authorized by City Council and is the beginning stage. 0 2 pr . 1998 1999 2000 2001 ID Task Name Duration AIMIJ�JIALSIOINJD JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIM►A�MIJIJ ALS]OINID • 133 NS Sewer Edenton533d ! !+ i t ! i ! i I 134 Design 150d ' 65% III ! ' i i I I ! I i 135 Review Rens 15d '4 `0'b : ' 136 Obtain Right of Way .W,._..,._.__150d . �0% 137 FinafzeRaps___., _.__._.,._. ,_-15d m 0% ' 138 Advertise • 21d : 0% • : 139 Counci Bid Award 1d h0% : , ! ! j , ; ; , j 140 Obtain Contract Documents : 15d : - , . G % 141 Reconstruction Conference 1d • -jO% • , . 142 Construction 180d R_ 1 _�� ,.. 0% , , • - • DOVE STREET PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM Project Description: Dove St. Force Main (Lonesome Dove Ave. to Kirkwood) Discussion: The first phase of this project was originally approved and funded for the FY1996- 97. The first phase will be constructing a 14" force main along Dove. St. and modifying the existing lift station located at Dove. St. and Lonesome Dove Ave. In the future, an additional 18" force main along Dove St. will be required in order to serve the subsequent development and the existing homes connecting to sewer. Therefore, instead of constructing the 18" force main at a later date and disturbing the area a second time, the city will construct the 18" force main at the same time as constructing the 14" force main. The estimated cost to design and construct these sewer force mains is $1,119,800. The design of this project is complete. There are four . ® easements yet to be obtained. The expected completion date is October 1999. The portion of the gravity sewer line from Kirkwood Hollow to Dove Street will begin construction in December. 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration NID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIM!AIM!JIJ!AISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJtJ 45 Dove Road Sewer 734d I' - . . 46 Design 347d .INS 0% : [ . • , . 47 Review Rans 65d - o 10O% , ; ' : • : . I 48 Obtain Rght of Way 265d i..:..- ' <1 : ! 1-80% 49 Rnafze Runs 10d ; `.4 : 0% I 50 Advertise 28d ; . 0% • ' 51 Conned Bid Award id ! 0! i 52 Obtain Contract Documents 15d p; j . 53 Reconstruction Conference 1d 0 ; ! �n , 54 Construction 120d (..,,;..<. 1 ' •0% Project Description: 18"Force Main from Raintree Vicinity to Kirkwood Blvd. Discussion: This force main will convey the sewer from the Raintree/Shady Lane vicinity to the proposed sanitary sewer line at the intersection of Dove St. and the future Kirkwood Blvd. The cost of this project is estimated at $712,800, although only $432,000 was appropriated for the FY1997-98 budget. The remaining $280,800 will be funded in the FY1998-99 budget._ This project has been designed and is being reviewed by the city. The design was delayed due to changing the alignment of the force main to cross the Tract III, Westbrook property and property • owned by CISD on Highland. 3 or 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name DurationAlSIOINID JIFLMIA[MIJIJIAISIOINJO J�F�M�A�M�J[J�A�SIO�N�D J�F�M�A�M�J�J�A�S�O�N�D J�F�MJA 79 Form Mato from Ralntru Vicinity 652d ' 1I ' ; . 79 Design 287d . R.�, t � , : ! f rI4 , 100% i . , . 80 Review Hans 30d . Q • to . . 81 Obtain Rgtd of Way 150d - :.—.-- 0% . . : 82 FnalzeFians 20d © p/, 83 Advertise 28d . t : 0% 84 Counci Bid Award 1d • 85 Obtain Cordract Documents 15d • : ' 04 . ;40%. 86 Reconstruction Conference • 1d . 0% 87 Construction 150d Hi ! ! ! ! !! .0% 1 ! ! t ' Project Description: Lift Station Located in the Raintree/Shady Lane Vicinity Discussion: This lift station will pump sanitary sewer from the Raintree/Shady Ln. area to the gravity sanitary sewer located at Dove St. and the future Kirkwood Blvd. The estimated cost of this project is $467,500, of which $318,750 was allotted for the FY1997-98. The remaining $148,750 will be allocated for the FY1998-99. This project design is completed and the plans have been reviewed by the city. The bid opening date for this project was November 19, 1998. The anticipated schedule is as follows: 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration AISIOINID JIFIMIA 89 Lift Station Q Raintr,e!Shady trio 481d • 90 Design 185d 1100%' 91 Review Rans 45d %' 92 --Obtain light of Way 150d : t,.,. .r 100% 93 Fnalze Flans 20d • ; 100% • ' 94 Advertise 28d 100% T 95 Counci Bid Aw ard 1d 0%; ; 96 Obtain Contract Documents 15d . ' 053 97 Reconstruction Conference 1d 0% 98 Construction 150d Project Description: 18" Gravity Sewer Line from Mesco Lift Station to Proposed Raintree/Shady Ln. Lift Station Discussion: This sanitary sewer line will begin at the existing lift station located near the Mesco property and extend to the proposed lift station in the Raintree/Shady Lane area. With the construction of this line, the existing lift station at Mesco will be eliminated. The estimated design and construction cost is $250,000, although only $30,000 was appropriated in the FY1997-98 CIP budget for the design. The remaining $220,000 will be funded in the FY1998-99 budget. This project is in its beginning design stage. S 4 Pir 1998 1999 2000 S 1ID B�kNante omrAseotoRvntr�� Duration ALSjOjNjO JIFIMIA1MIJIJIAISIOINJD JlFIMIAIMIJlJIA!SIOINID JIFIMIA(MIJJJIAISIOINID JIFIMIA 114, 1 i i i i i i I 1 ` .i j , , i i I ; ; i i iiii0111111 III 101 Design i. 333d i ,5 75% i ; ' j ! . , Ili . 102 Review Plans 30d ' - _ , 0% . , 103 Main fight of Way 150d i r-. v u „ ,_,4: 0% : , ' ' ' ' 104 RiafzePans 20d © i . , ::OV' : • , : ' 105 Advertise • 28d . . 1096; , 106 CounciBidAward 1d ; ' ' ` 'ii09i • ; 107 Main Contract Documents 15d : - • . ' . . • . p: > 096 108 Reconstruction Conference • 1d TO% 109 Construction 150d : . 1_w-1._,:._.-,;.._, ..-4., . 0% WATER INFRASTRUCTURE Project Description: 12" Water Line along Continental to Crooked Lane to S. Kimball to F.M. 1709 Discussion: Currently, the existing 12" water line along F.M. 1709 is fed only from one direction. With the construction of the above referenced water line, a loop with the existing 12" water line along F.M. 1709 with the 12" water line along Continental will be created. The plans for this project have been completed and reviewed by the city. The city is in the process of obtaining the required easements for construction. The easement acquisition should be complete by mid-January. Construction is anticipated to take at least 180 days. 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration NOD JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINLD JtF[MIAIMIJIJIAISlOINID JIF!MIANIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJ]J • 67 Can DesignVKunballVYater 741d . . 68 Design 240d '100°,6 69 Review Plans 107d © •100% , 70 Cbtain Right of Way 338d '60% 71 ......Finatze flans 10d 10% , 72 Advertise 28d : : : ' o : : • . 0%. 73 Ccuncd Bid Award Id 0. 11 ' ' i 74 Obtain Contract Documents 15d © 0% : : : 75 Reconstruction Conference 1d 2; : • 76 Construction 150d ' I 0% • Project Description: 12" Water Line -Dove St. to Kirkwood Blvd Discussion: This project will provide water service to the IBM complex in Solana as well as the future development along the future Kirkwood Blvd. This project was approved and funded in the FY1996-97 CIP budget. The estimated cost for this project was $326,000.. Construction is complete for this project and finished ahead of schedule and under budget. Project Description: 24" Transmission Water Line from Trophy Club to Ground Storage Tank No. 2 Discussion: This water line will provide a second main feed for the city from the City of Fort Worth. This project was approved and funded for $1,300,000 in the FY1996-97 CIP budget. For the FY1997-98 CIP budget, $105,500 was allocated with the remaining $105,500 budgeted for the FY1998-99 CIP budget. The design of this project is complete. The construction plans 0 "7/,1d O pr . have been reviewed by the city and are finalized. The city is in the process of obtaining the • necessary easements for this project. • 1997 1998 1999 90 ID Task Name Duration JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINLD JLF.JMJAIMIJIJIAISIOINJD JIFJMIA[MIJ IAISIOINID jjFLMIAIMIJIJIAIS. 12 24'Transmission Water Line 791d 4 , , . ` . . . , _ , . ; 0: ; 13 Design 180d 100% • 14 Review Rans 50d I : 100%! I. . , , , ; , . : ; 15 Obtain flight of Way 387d 1 ; , , ,I-50%, : ; 1II ;I : 1111 16 Finalize Bans 10d 11007E ' 0 17 Advertise ._.. 28d © 0 b 18 CounciBidAward Id 0 : 18 19 Obtain Contract—Document; • 15d 0%i 20 Reconstruction Conference id 0 I , , i l I . . . ! i M 21 Construction 240d . i ' ' . . , . ' • `0% , ; • Project Description: 24" Transmission Line from Ground Storage Tank No. 2 to Dove Elevated Tank Discussion: The construction of this water line will provide a redundant source from the proposed Ground Storage Tank No.2 to the Dove St. elevated water tower. The estimated design and construction of this project is estimated to be $850,000 and is financed through the FY1997-98 CIP budget. The construction is complete for this project. Project Description: 20" Water Line from FM 1709/White Chapel to Woodland Heights Discussion: The construction has been completed and the waterline is in service. • Project Description: 12" Water Line on Continental from Crooked Lane to Heritage Business Park Discussion: This water line is crucial in providing a redundant source of fire flow for Heritage Business Park. This water line will also provide a loop with the existing water lines from Commerce Business Park and Heritage Business Park to the proposed 12" water line along Continental. The estimate for this water line $162,000. The right-of-way was replatted to • accommodate the extension of Continental and this water line 1998 1999 2000 2001 ID Task Name Duration AIMIJ J A SIOINID JIFIMIAIM JIJIAISIOINID,JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISt0INID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOJNID 111 1r Line on Continental to Heritage 411d ? 4 ; ; , i _ 112 Design 176d i 35°6€ 113 Review Flans 21d ` - a ; .056 ; : 114 Obtain Right of Way 120d i . : ' ' ' _ ' 115 Finalize Flans 1 10d , , . 1 ; Ei 0% , , ' . . - . _ ' 116 Advertise _... 28d 1 ; ! 1 ' ; : : : • • . { : 117 CounciBidAward i 1d , ; : . . . : 0% ; . _ : _ ' 118 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ' 0% : ' ; ' 119 Reconstruction Conference I 1d . O 120 Construction 60d • • ; 0°% ; . . Project Description: 12" Water Line on E. Dove St.from White Chapel to Carroll Ave. Discussion: This water line will replace the existing 6" water line along E. Dove St. The engineering is funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. The estimated cost for the engineering is • 6 l,e-.Y Plir $22,800. The funding for the construction of this line will be budgeted in the FY1999-00. The • estimated amount for the construction is $277,200, therefore the total amount for this project is estimated to be $300,000. The engineering is in the preliminary stage. 1998 1999 2000 2001 ID Task Name Duration JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAlSIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIA]S1O1N1D JjF(MIAJMIJIJjAISIOINID JIFIMIAJMIJIJIAIS 122 1P an E.Dave from WC to Carroll 415d : ; . , ;". _ _ ;.' ; ; . • . 123 Design 120d "—. 85%; : • ; . . • : ' , 124 Review Flans 21d : ' i l ' . 0% ; : , . ' 125 Obtain fight of Way 150d N_.....:-_,_,,__ 0% . . • ; : 126 Fnaie—R—ns _._,.„.,w_, 10d ; . t3: 0%; 127 Advertise 28d : . _ : 0 0% : : ; i , 128 CounciBidAward 1d ' 0% ? ' 129 Obtain Contract Ibctenents 15d ! . • : :p. • . . 130 Reconstruction Conference • Id 131 Construction Project Description: 12" Water Line on N. White Chapel from W.Highland to F.M. 1709 Discussion: The current 12" water line along N. White Chapel is deteriorating and requires replacing. It was once thought that the entire waterline from FM 1709 to Highland would have to be replaced. However upon further investigation, the waterline only needs to be replaced from FM 1709 to Bicentennial Park. The design of this project will begin in the near future and the construction will take place during the FY1998-99 and FY1999-00. The engineering costs are estimated to be $22,800 and have been allocated in the FY1997-98. The remaining $262,000 will be funded as part of the FY1998-99 and FY1999-00 CEP budgets. The preliminary design and S construction schedule is as follows.199 1999 2000 2001 ID Task Name Duration MIJIJIAIStOjNJD JIFIMIAIM!J!JIAIS!OINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJtAISIOINID J 133 tr on WC from Highland to FM1T09 340d 134 Design 45d 6..:,,,j ; 0% ; : ; ; ; ; ! , 135 Review Flans 21d ' d ' 0%; . ' 136 Obtain Right of Way 150d i • ' I 137 Finalize Flans 10d : ' u ' 0% . ' 138 Advertise 28d : . '© . 0% ' 139 Council Bid Award 1d . _ ii l 0% : 140 .__ Obtain Contract Documents —.µ. 15d 0 0% i i 141 Reconstruction Conference id 0% 142 Construction 90d . . . t ..- ',_ 0% Project Description: Miron Elevated Tank Discussion: This water tower will maintain adequate fire flow and water pressure to the east side of the city's water system. The original estimated amount for this project increased from $1,560,000 to $1,860,000. This increase is attributed to required modifications to the elevated tanks at Bicentennial Park and at E. Dove St. once the construction is complete to the Miron elevated tank. These improvements total $90,000. Furthermore, a second floor in the tank shaft will also be constructed as part of the Miron elevated tank. This improvement will cost $60,000. The remaining $150,000 is for the design and construction of the aesthetic features of the tank portion of the water tower that the City Council approved. The engineering and construction costs are divided between the FY1997-98 and FY1998-99, which amount to $855,000 and 0 ze/o Ilir . $1,005,000, respectively. The low bidder for the project bid $1,485,000, which does not include • the aesthetic features to the tank. A change order will be issued once the aesthetic design is finalized. The construction has begun for this project. 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration NbD JIF]MIAIMIJIJIAbSIOINIO JIFjMjAjMIJIJIAISIOINbD JIFIMIAlMIJIJIAISIOINbO J1FbMIAIMIJIJ 78 M'rron Berated Tank 585d 79 Design 200d ; ,, . . - _ . •. ' . . . . . . : _ 80 w Review Flans —_ ._16d ' , . ' . 100% i 81 ,�., Obtae RigFt of Way, — _.___._.__.Oi • Finaf 82 zeRans 21d _ : ' 83 Advertise 19d • 100% 84 Council Bid Award id 85 OW*Contract Documents 15d •100% • : : . , 86 Reconstruction Conference 1d i • i ; i I 87 Construction 230d ' 1 . ! ► 1- 509E 's . , i I II ii 1 Project Description: Pump Station No. 2 at T.W. King Rd. Discussion: This pump station will provide water storage and distribution to the northern part of the city. The tank itself was approved and funded for the FY1996-97 for an estimated cost of $600,000. Along with the ornamental facade, which was not estimated in the original cost of the tank, and the increase in the bid of the tank from the estimate, there was a $400,000 increase to the project. Construction of the tank is complete. The design of the pump station is complete and the plans have been reviewed by the city. Construction of the pump station will be delayed until the construction of the 24" transmission waterline begins. For the FY1997-98 CEP budget, S $1,825,000 was appropriated and the remaining $685,000 will be funded in the FY1998-99 for a total estimated cost of the project of$3,110,000. 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration NIO JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJjJIAbSbOINID JIFIM!AIMIJIJIAlSbO!NID JIFIMIA!MbJIJ 111 T.IfL IOng Ground Storage Tank 734d v: • • •: 112 Design 292d • 100% , . 113 ._Review Pans 103d : © 100%: . 114 Obtain Right of Way Od • O: , . S 313; . . 115 Finaize Rens 20d ; 0i ! • • 116 Advertise 28d : b • , :IIM4.0% - - 117 CouncfBidAward id ! . • : ' 0% : - 118 Obtain Contract Documents 15d © , % i i 119 Reconstruction Conference • 1d ; 13% • , 120 Construction 210d : i ° i 's ,........ t . r 0% Project Description: Oversizing of 20" Water Line Through Town Center Discussion: The current Master Water Concept Plan requires a 20" water line to loop with the existing 20" transmission line along N. White Chapel and the existing 20" transmission line along F.M. 1709. The proposed route for this water line is along N. Carroll from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 thence along S.H. 114 to N. White Chapel. Due to the future vertical alignment of the proposed N. Carroll/S.H. 114 intersection, the city proposes to locate the section of this 20" water line from F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 through the Town Center Development. The construction of the water line is complete. S 8 rjr . Project Description: McKee Water System Purchase and 8" Water Line Construction for Oak III Lane Residents Discussion: The residents of Oak Lane are being served water via a private water system, which ' was owned by the McKee Water System. The city recently purchased the rights for the private water system. The city proposes to construct an 8" water line to serve the residents of Oak Lane. Following the construction of the water line, the private well water system will be abandoned. During the FY1997-98, $175,000 was appropriated for the purchase of the water system and engineering and construction of the proposed 8" water line. The preliminary schedule is as follows: . 98 • 1999 2000 2001 ID Task Nana Duration J)AISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJ!AISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOIN!D J!FIMIAIMIJIJIAISEOINID JIFIM 144 Oak Lane 8'Water Line 443d + r i ! i i ' 11 145 Design 80d ; i 0% : j , , . . illiiiiiiii , . _ . . , , 146 Review Flans 15d *O i i ' i 147 Obtain Right of Way 150d i : '0% j i . i ! Will . ; ! 148 Fnafze flans 15d linizi ' ti OX i i 1 149 Advertise 21d , III iiiii6aH ; I , . , , ' : ' � 150 Canci Bid Aw&d 1d ° ' 11111 151 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 6' 0°b . 152 Fteconstructbn Conference 1d l P016 i . , 153 Construction 150d t D% ! ' S . , , . ._ . . .__ . . _ III . :.., . . Pr MONTHLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE 411 December 1998 1996-98 Roadway Improvement CIP Projects Project Description: Slurry Seal in Various Subdivisions . Discussion: The city has established a roadway rehabilitation program for existing asphalt streets. Primarily, the rehabilitation of the streets will consist of a slurry seal application over the existing asphalt. The city plans to slurry seal each subdivision that has had sanitary sewer constructed to serve the subdivision. The city plans to slurry seal the various subdivisions approximately one year following the construction of the sanitary sewer. For the FY1997-98, $80,000 has been appropriated to slurry seal Emerald Estates, Highland Estates, Whispering Dell Estates, Dove Estates, Harbor Oaks, Brittany Court, and Raven Bend. Project Description: W. Dove Reconstruction from S.H. 114 to N. White Chapel Discussion: Construction of this project involves reconstructing the existing roadway. The widening of the existing cross-section of this road will be limited to 1 to 2 feet. Minor drainage improvements will also be constructed for this project. This project was originally approved to be budgeted for the FY1997-98 for an estimated cost of $150,000. Originally, this project was delayed so as not to risk damaging the reconstructed road during the proposed development along Dove. However, under the approved developer's agreement with Maguire Thomas, this project has been moved up to be constructed as soon as possible. Therefore, the cost for designing and constructing this project has been be allocated within the FY1997-98 CIP budget. The design has • been completed and the construction will begin following the sewer line construction along Dove. 1998 1999 2( ID Task Name Duration NovjDec Jan lFeblMarlAprjMayjJunI Jul lAugISepl Oct 1NoviDec Jan IFeblMarlAprlf ekknlJullAuglseplOctlNovlDec JanjFebltarjAprIMay[Jun 89 W.Dove 114to White Chapel 455d , ► e 1 i 90 Design 190d 100%, . :A . 91 Review flans 21d '100% ; p 92 Obtain 13ght of Way Od , ' 0 93 Eclat e l ans 10d 0% : ca . 94 Advertise 28d 0% ram., 95 —Count Bid Award w—--id ' i 113 O 96 Obtam Cordract Documents m 15d 0% - o 97 ffieconstructian Conference 1d �1� 98 Construction o- 120d : i , ',0%°....:... ,.`a Project Description: Union Church and S. Pearson Reconstruction Discussion: This project is estimated to cost $534,311. For the FY1997-98, $42,745 was appropriated for the engineering. For the FY1998-99 & FY1999-00, the remaining $491,566 will be divided equally each FY to fund the construction. If needed, the widening of the existing . cross-section of this road will be limited to 1 to 2 feet. The design of the water line along Union Church and S. Pearson will be incorporated in the design of this project. The design has been - - —- delayed in order-to discuss with the City of Keller the possibility of Keller participating in funding this project since most of the traffic generated is for Keller residents. The preliminary schedule is reflected on the following page. 40 .., 10 IFF 98 1999 2000 • ID Task Name DtratIon all lAuglSep1OdlNovlDee JefilFeelfier 140633Y:him I IdlAuglSeplOct(Novllxc JenlFeelMarIAPr(hAayldm Jd jAug1SeP1Oct'Nov Dec JecIFeb 111 Union Church R S.Paxson 316d 1 1L -O% I i i i . I I ! I I I I i 112 Design 90d113 Review Pans 21dC ® O% i s 114 Obtain Right of Way-- _ Od 0 • 115• µ FinakzeRans_- __.._ 10d © >�0% 116 Advertise 28d a. 0% : 117 Canci Bid Aw and 1d 0 . 1' 118 Cbtan Contract Documents 15d p .0% 119 Reconstruction Conference Id O 715 ' 120 Construction 150d : ra.•.-ram- ,R'P ;0% Project Description: N. White Chapel from S.H. 114 to County Line Discussion: This project will be constructed as a cooperative project with Tarrant County. The city will pay the engineering and material cost and Tarrant County will provide the labor. The estimated material cost is $181,850. The existing cross section of the roadway will remain the same. This project is desi ned and construction has begun. 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration ep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov,Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 122 N.White Chapel 348d 1 123 Design 174d enimmwommitloo.% 124 Review Plans 34d : • Q • , 100% 126 Obtain Right of Way Od 0 . .611 ° . • 126 Finatze Plans _ . 5d © ! 100% . 127 Reconstruction ConferencB 1d ; 0 7121 128 Construction 100d 85% Project Description: S. Kimball Extension from Crooked Ln. to Heritage Business Park Discussion: The projected cost for this project is $1,750,000. This project will be funded for the design and engineering in the FY1997-98 CIP budget for $80,000. The remaining $1,670,000 will be budgeted in later years. Developer participation may accelerate the construction of this roadway. The improvements include constructing a divided four-lane arterial roadway. The preliminary schedule is shown below. 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name • Duration Jun I Jul lAu9lSepJ Oct lnovjDec Jan IFeblN rjAP<ItYI IiiiJI'Aug jSepl Oct(Novi Dec Jan IFebIMarJAPr(May'Jun 1IAIAu9ISePI Oct lNovlDec Jan 130 S.Kimball Extension 346d 1 1 1 i,. 131 Design 120d 1-0% 132 Review Rans 21d o p°hi 133 -. Cbtain Right of Way . — Od 0 134 -_-Fnar¢e Pans...,.,..w_,...... ._,.._10d o f0% i 135 Advertise 28d , r O°h . . 136 Council Bid Award 1d 0 ' '7123 : 137 Obtain Contract Documents- 15d_ 138 Reconstmction Conference 1d 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i O H 1 81161 139 Construction 150d ; ; : i r o% S 11 ir Project Description: N. Carroll from FM 1709 to Ownby ii• Discussion: This project is for the realignment of N. Carroll to match S. Carroll. For the FY 1997-98, the project will be designed and constructed. The project will be complete before the Town Center, Phase I is complete. This realignment is also essential before the traffic lights on FM 1709 can be synchronized using a computer closed loop system. The cross-section of the roadway will be 4 lanes divided by a median. The anticipated construction cost for this project is $850,000, of which $250,000 will be funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. TIF funds will reimburse the CIP budget once TIF funds become available. The project has been designed and construction will be in soon. 1998 1999 ID Task Name I)satlon Jan lFebl Mar lAprlMaylamI Jul IAuglSepjOdIN vlDec Jan jFe,j rlAprlt, yl.AnilAuglSeplOctlNovlDec Jan lFeblktarlApr1MayIJunlJ AugI 185 N.Carrot RWignm.nt 286d i,: _ ,i Iii _ . 186 Design 1101 100% 187 Review Flans 21d •0095 i 188 Obtain Right of Way 0d <: 189 FnateRens 1041 I ® 100% 190 Advertise 28d . 50% 191 Counci Bid Award id 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 !0 1116 ! , I 192 Obtain Contract Documents 15d : 41 ;0% 193 .._FleconstructionConference id '(> 11730 194 Constructgn 100d Project Description: Brumlow Reconstruction Discussion: This project was constructed as a cooperative project with Tarrant County. The city paid for the engineering and material cost and Tarrant County provided the labor. The estimated material cost is $112,700. The existing cross section of the roadway will remain the • same. The construction has been completed. Project Description: Traffic Signal Lights on F.M. 1709 Discussion: The city conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis along F.M. 1709. The results warranted traffic signal lights at the intersections of Shady Oaks and F.M. 1709 and Commerce and F.M. 1709. For the FY1997-98 CIP budget, $100,000 was appropriated for the signal lights at each of these intersections. The design is complete and approved by TxDOT for these traffic lights. The Shady Oaks traffic light contract has been awarded and the Commerce traffic light will be advertised for bids in the near future. Project Description: Traffic Signal Light Synchronization on F.M. 1709 Discussion: As discussed in the past, HDR Engineering was retained to perform a F.M. 1709 Traffic Signal Study. Their report was delivered to the city on August 8, 1997. This report confirmed staff's opinion that the signals along F.M. 1709 should and could be coordinated by means of a centralized computer system. Council recently approved a professional service contract with Lee Engineering to proceed with the design of this coordinated system. For the FY1997-98 CIP budget, $25,000 has been appropriated for the design of this project. Funding -- - - --for this project was-placed-in the-1998-1999 budget cycle.- The anticipated amount-to fund the implementation of the proposed computer closed loop system is $250,000. In the interim, a timing plan has been submitted and approved by TxDOT for the existing traffic lights, as well as • for the proposed signal lights at Shady Oaks Drive, Town Square, and Commerce Street. With L12 Pjr the implementation of the timing plan, the traffic. lights will be sequenced or time based Scoordinated with one another to allow for more through traffic along F.M. 1709. The timing plan will be phased to account for the peak flow of traffic with respect to the time of day. TxDOT is currently reviewing the plans. Project Description: Byron Nelson Parkway and Southridge Lakes Parkway Striping Discussion: For the FY1997-98 CIP budget, $65,000 has been appropriated to stripe Byron Nelson Parkway and Southridge Lakes Parkway. Prior to restriping Byron Nelson, a portion of the roadway will be widened south of the intersection of Wentwood and Byron Nelson. The widening will improve the transition from the 4-lane divided roadway to the 4-lane undivided section of roadway for the southbound traffic. The widening is complete. The striping will begin November 23, 1998. The schedule is as follows: 1998 1999 2000 ID Task tiaras Dratlon Apr dayLJunl Jul!Aug lsepLodir4ovJDec Jan lFell PAH lApri/VeyiJun I Jul lAugIsWl Oct Mal Dec JaIFeeI�rIAvrlM3yl.kInl Jul lAuglSePI Oct Iitv 196 Byron Nelson Rssepin0 143d I,i i , II 10 I i I I 197 Design 45d I 10074 1 1 ,1 i , j1 _ ! 1 ; 1 j ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 198 Review Rens 5d i 1009E 1 1 j i i i ii I ii 1 1 i 199 (Main Right of Way Od j , 161 1 1 1 11 ! , 200 Flake Rans 10d 10O%':. 201 Advertise 28d 100% : 202 Counc4 Bid Award 1d 116 203 Obtain Contract Documents 15d 100%i 204 Reconstruction Conference 205 ..__ 1d 1UI8 .:.,...Construction W 30 50% III . . __. . _ _ . . . . .. :,., 13 V , • MONTHLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE • December 1998 1996-98 Neighborhood Sewer/Street CIP Projects NEIGHBORHOOD SEWER/STREET PROJECTS Project Description: Shady Lane Area (Sewer, Water and Road Improvements) Discussion: Originally, $1,467,445 was approved and appropriated for the FY1997-98 CIP budget. Due to expanding the original concept of this project, there was an increase of$458,550. This is attributed to providing sanitary sewer service for the residents north of the Jones Branch creek as well as building the ultimate culvert under Shady Ln. across the Jones Branch. The construction of the water lines will replace the existing undersized water lines. Construction is near completion for the sewer portion of this project. The remainder of the sanitary sewer construction, the portion that will flow to Grapevine, will begin November 23, 1998. Approval was granted by the City of Grapevine to allow a portion of this sewer flow through Grapevine's sewer system. The street portion of this project is also near completion. The culvert under Shady Lane will be bid separately following the completion of the drainage study for West Jones Branch. 1 1997 1998 1999 1 ID Task Name Duration AISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJ!JIAIS!OIN<ID JIF]MIAIMIJIJfAISIOINID JIFIMIA 1 Shady Lane Water/Sewer/Roads : 572d : k 2 Cesgn 75d 100% : . ' 3 Review Flans 21 d 100•%: • ' _ ; _ 4 Obtain fight of Way 210d ; '-100% ; . _ . ; , 5 RnatzeFlans 10d 1 0096 'S 6 Advertise 25d ! =1 100%€ ; . . 7 CounciBid'Award 1d 12115 : ! O; . 8 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ! : . • © 100% I ; . : . 9 AeconstrucOm Conference 1d 1 h117 ' : : , : ' . 10 Construction 245d ; ct�. a 90% . . Project Description: Huntwick Sanitary Sewer/Abandonment of Lift Station at Carroll and. Dove Discussion: This project has existing funds allotted from previous years. Construction of these improvements will provide sanitary sewer service to Huntwick Estates. The construction of the sewer lines are complete, however, electric power has to be installed to the lift station located in Quail Creek Estates that serves Huntwick. S 14 -�.9/7 Prr . 1997 1998 1999 ID Task Name Duration A(SIO(NID J(FIMIA(M(JIJIA(S(0(N(D JIFIM(AIMIJ(J(a(s(o(NJD J(F(M(A(M(J(J(A(SIO(N(D J(F(MIA • 12 lkntwidr Sewer • 481d 1 1 ri i , I I : 1 I t l , : , . ! 1 ; ,,R i l ' i i l ` E I! I i 13 Cosign 60d ! `100% I ? I I j i t i i ! t I 14 Review Plans 15d tr.7 100% ' ' ' • ' ' ' ' 15 Cbtait fight of Way W w 200d 8I I'100% , ; 16 Foote Flans—— w.__.._ —10d ®: : ;t 100%; . . ' . : . 17 Advertise 12d : . 100%I : • . . - ; . , 18 Counci Bid Aw ard 1d , s a . 11/18 : 1 19 CM*Contract Cocuneds 15d . ; • . © 100% . : . . 20 Reconstruction Conference 1d :0: 1227 ' ' • 21 Construction I 240d C6 100%: Project Description: Mission Hills Sanitary Sewer Discussion: This project was approved and funded for the FY1996-97 in the amount of $368,000. The cost for this project increased due to efforts to save existing trees and replace existing landscaping within the R.O.W. The increase totaled $62,000 and was funded through the FY1997-98 CIP budget. This project is complete. Project Description: Burney Ln. Reconstruction from N. Carroll to Lonesome Dove Ave. Discussion: Construction of this project involves reconstructing the existing roadway. If needed, the widening of the existing cross-section of this road will be limited to 1 to 2 feet. Minor drainage improvements will also be constructed for this project. This project was approved and is funded in the FY1997-98 & FY 1998-99 CIP budgets for an estimate of S $147,000. The design is complete and the plans are being reviewed by the city. Ir 1998 1999 2C ID Task Name Duration NovIDec JanlFeblNhrlAprIhky1JunIJulJAugISepIOctlNwIDec Jan IRebIMarIAprlPayI.hn(Jul jAugISeDI cot jIovIDec JanjFebIhrerIAprItMyIJun 1 Burney(Carroll to Lonesome Dove 365d , 2 Design 135d a ...,,,. , 100% 3 ,r,Review Flans Old _ 30% , 4 Obtain 13ght of Way —Od I 5 .__FinafzeFlans __....,...,...,._ 10d i C € • • 1 ' 0% ' 6 Advertise • 28d coo i 0% 7 Counci Bid Award td j 0 2111 8 Obtain Contract Documents' 15d i i 0% 9 Reconstruction Conference 1d 5 10 Construction 9Ow /„ ...,,......4 0°6 Project Description: Love Henry Court Reconstruction Discussion: This project was approved to be funded for the FY1997-98 for an estimate of $109,00 to design and reconstruct the road. These proposed improvements include replacing the existing concrete curb and existing asphalt roadway and constructing minor drainage improvements. The City Council directed staff to include the sanitary sewer for this subdivision as part of this project. The estimated cost for the sanitary sewer is $350,000. The project will be funded with $206,425 in the FY1997-98 CIP budget & $152,575 in the FY1998-99 CIP budget. The project is designed and the plans are being reviewed by the city. • . 15 /� Q pr_ 1998 1999 20 ID Task Name [tur7dIon NovlDeo Jan lFeblMarlAprlMtaylJunl Jul IAu9l 1O:t.ING/ICeo AlFeb1MarlAKIMaY11111 Jul IAual eplOIPlDee Jan IFebIftefIAaIWaYI.n 1111 12 LOW Henry Court 0 315d 'I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i : if I I li 1 1 I 1 if I 13 Oesgn 120d 100% 1 i I 1 l 14 Review Rens 80d ;c# 30%: ' 15 Obtain Right of Way 60d 0% : ' 16 Fnaize Bans.,._ _. 10d • 10 0% , 17 Advertise 28d ; ®; 0% 18 Counci Bid Award 1d : 0 ; : 2/11: i' 19 Oblast Contract Documents 15d • • ® . 0% • ' 20 Reconstruction Conference Id 0 21 Construction 60d • 0%i i Project Description: Lake Dr. Street Reconstruction along w/Water &Sewer Improvements Discussion: This project was approved to be funded in the FY1997-98 & FY 1998-99 CIP budgets for an estimate of$169,000. The improvements for this project include a new water line along Lake Drive, a sewer line, and repaving Lake Drive. The proposed water line will replace the existing undersized water line along Lake Drive. The proposed sewer line will serve the residents along the east side of Lake Dr. There is one utility easement that is being obtained prior to bidding the project. 1998 1999 1 ID Task Name Duration NovIDec Jan lFeblAharjApr1r ylJunI Jul lAugiSep I Oct INovlDec JanIFeb Mer'Apr IWayl I Jul IAui'Sept Oct INovjDec Jan lFebl Mar lAprlMayPun • 23 Lake Drive 422d ' 0 24 Design 60d 100% . 25 Review Rens 75d 100% 26 Obtah Rglt of Way 40197d • p°y 27 ..,_-Fnafze Flans 10d s7 ; ;0% 28 Advertise 28d , g% : 29 Counci Bid Award 1d 18 30 Obtah Contract Documents 15d !0% 31 Reconstruction Conference 1d 12 32 Construction 120d 0%• Project Description: Lilac Ln. Reconstruction and Sewer Improvements Discussion: This project was funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget for an estimate of$168,768 and funded in the FY1998-99 for an estimate of $65,832. The design of the sewer and road reconstruction is complete and the plans are being reviewed by the City. The estimate reflects the anticipated costs to build the sewer along Lilac Lane followed by reconstructing Lilac Lane. 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration Junl Jul lAuglSept Oct INoJDec Jan lFeblMarlAprlMhylJunlJullAug,Sep,Oct lNwlDec Jan IFeblMartAprjMay[Jun III!Aug'Sept Oct INovlDec Jan 34 Lilac Sew er/Roadway 278d , 35 Design 50d • 100°,62 I 36 Review Flans 38d 100% 37 Obtain Right of Way 45d i 1 I %.. :..,,.r . 38 Fnatze Plans 25d 50% ; 39 Advertise 28d g% ] r 40 -Comd Bid Award- 1d - : 1/14? 0 41 Obtan Contract Documents 15d 0% o i - 42 Reconstmclon Conference-- 1d :5 . s.„ , „ i 43 Construction 120d � : °(r.. a ill . : , :..., 16 —"/ • Irr Project Description: Sutton Place Drainage (CDBG) S Description: As part of this fiscal year's CDBG project, Sutton Place is scheduled for drainage improvements. Storm drain will be constructed in the subdivision and also extended to relieve the offsite drainage. Sutton Road will then be paved following the drainage improvements. The plans have been designed and are being reviewed by the city. The required drainage easements have been obtained. The city portion to fund this project is estimated to be $230,000. 1998 1999 2000 20 ID Task Name Duration OINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINjD JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID'JIFIMIAIMIJIJJAISIOINID.JIFIMIAIMIJ 155 Sutton Place Drainage(CDBG) 352d ; k f' - ; 156 Design 88dliC.., , . , ' 100% , 157 Review Plans 50d ® '20%' • •• ' 158 Obtain fight of Way 150d : ; t d-, ,., „r . • 159 Fiat eFlans 10d ' • ` 0% • 160 Advertise 28d ; _ y--a, 0% 161 Counci Bid Award id li i I I 0%, : 162 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ' ' , ' ' ; G I 0% 1 0: , . ! 163 Reconstruction Conference 1d 09L; ' 164 Construction 90d • . !,— . 0%` : ; : ; Project Description: Harrell Drive Reconstruction Discussion: Construction of this project involves reconstructing the existing roadway without widening the existing roadway. The existing drainage problems will be addressed in the design of this project. This project is estimated to cost $140,000. For the FY1997-98, $11,200 was Sappropriated for the engineering. For the FY1998-99, the remaining $128,800 will be funded for the construction. The preliminary schedule is shown below. 98 1999 2000 ID Task Name Duration 11IAugISeP OctINovIDec Jan IFebJM31IAprjMay Pun I Jul Au9ISepI Oct lNov(Dec,JanjFebjMarjAprlMaylJunI Jul lAugISeplOct1NoviDec JanlFeb 100 Harell Dr.Reconstruction 271d `" , _ 101 Design .W_. . 75d 0% 102 Review Flans 21d ; 0% 103 Obtain Right of Way Od 0 • 104 Brien Plans 10d ©: 0%, 105 Advertise 28d 0% i 106 CounciBidAward 1d I i ; : •0 y7 j 107 Obtain Contract Documents i 15d Q :0%: . 108 Reconstruction Conference_ 1d 0 1 109 -..M Construction ...,.,.... .....120d ' . ( `"-O% . Project Description: Year 3 Neighborhood Sewer (Jellico, Cross Timbers, Dove Acres, ' . Hillwood Acres) Discussion: As part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program, sanitary sewer service will be provided for residents in Jellico Estates, Cross Timber Hills, Dove Acres, and Hillwood Estates. The estimated engineering and construction cost is $2,000,000. Due to the extent of these projects, $1,550,000 was budgeted for the FY1997-98 CIP budget and $1,150,000 will be budgeted in the.FY1998-99 CIP budget. All construction plans are complete and have been reviewed by the city. The required easements are also being obtained for these projects. ' S 17 prr 1998 • 1999 2000 ID Task Name ILratIon AJSJOJNJD JJFJMJAJMJJJJJAJSJOJNJD JJFJMJAJMJJJJJAJSJOJNJD JJFJMJAJMJJJJJAJSJOJNJD JIFIMIA • 34 Millwood,Dove Aces Jam 35 DeDesign593d I • ; ! . : ; , , : i ; ; • ; I i 01 i 1 1 I 120d 100% I. I. i j i 36 Review Plans 68d ' i 4 •100%; : . . 37 Mail light of Way . 218d - : .r _.:., 0% 38 Fnatze Flans ---1-0-d: ' ' I ca • 1100% : 39 Advertise 28d i . . ;C7 : ; . : : ; •0% . : : 40 Counci Bid Award • ld , 0 225 . : 41 Cbtaar Conrad Documents 15d I 0' , . 0% • 42 Reconstnictlan Conference Id : ;0 9 43 Construction 210d I u, _.,..,,,-,• 0% 1998 1999 2000 : ID Task Name Duration AISJOINJD JJFJMJAJMIJJJJAJSJOJNJD JJFJMJAJMJJJJJAI,SJOJNJD JJFJMJAJMJJJJJAJSJOJNJD JJFJMJA 45 Cross Timbers Sewer 554d , 4 ; ; 46 Design 174d 100% 47 Review Rans 50dH I 1 liCiMi: : : .. 1004i ` , _ ' : ! : I 48 Obtain Right of Way 1744 j 0% '. 49 FnalzeRans 45d 0 O.p 50 Advertise 25d : , C8 % , . ; , 51 Counci Bid Award id : . : 0. 1120 52 Obtain Cortract Documents 15d ' : :al 0%; : . 53 Reconstruction Conference td : • d ' :♦12J14 ' - ; 54 Construction 240d ` , ,. 0% ' • S Project Description: Cedar Creek Plantation Sewer • Description: The design of the sanitary sewer for this project was budgeted in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. The design is complete and the plans have been reviewed by the City. The anticipated cost for engineering and construction is $120,400, of which $10,000 is required for the engineering. The construction of the sewer line is scheduled for early in the FY1998-99. The preliminary schedule is shown below. 1998 1999 2000 2001 ID Task Name Duration JJFJMJAJMJJJJJAJS OJNJD JJFJMJAJMJJJJJAJSJOJNID JJFIM AJMJJJJJAJSIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAIS 144 Plantation Sewer 260d € :I . ; . ; 145 Design 55d 1110%, ` : 146 Review Flans 21d . . ' . . . . : . 147 Obtain Right of Way — 60d ,0% • . . . 148 Finalze Flans m —...m-10d i . ! i i 4 . 0% I . ' ' ' ' 149 Advertise 28d : . . a i 0% 150 Counci Bid Award 1d % I i . . 151 Obtain Contract Documents 15d ! ci I 0% ! . . . . . . . . , . : 152 Reconstruction Conference • td (Al : ' 153 Construction 90d € 1 0% ; _ ' . . . . . . . ; . : . r : . . . Project Description: Seal Coat- Woodland Heights and 8" Water Line Construction . Discussion: .This project was originally._funded for.completing the seal coat in the EY1996-97 . _ for an estimated $17,500. The seal coat has been completed. The 8" water line was approved to be funded for the FY1997-98 at an estimated cost of$30,000. This water line will loop the water line within the Woodland Heights Subdivision and Cambridge Place, Phase II. The design of this 410 - ::. 18 VIV water line will begin once the construction of the water line in Cambridge Phase II has been built ip and accepted by the city. Project Description: Highland Road from Shady Oaks to White Chapel Discussion: This project involves reconstructing the existing roadway. Although there will be no widening of the roadway, the alignment of W. Highland will be realigned with E. Highland. The city is currently negotiating with two homeowners to acquire the required right-of--way. Construction is anticipated to last for 180 days. 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID Task Name AISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIA1SIOtNID JIFIMIA MIJIJIAIs OINID JIF MIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIM JIJIA S. 12 IOghtand(Sirady-WC) , 13 Design ! I . 14 Review Rans 00% ; I III II I II I 15 Obtain Right of Way a..J • , . . . . . i ' I : 16 Fnaf¢e Flans1 :61,",°°°,4 . : Iiii I III . II I 17 Advertise I i : II . . II I i . i i i I . 18 Council Bid Award I 0' , II 1128iiiIIIII 19 Obtan Contact Docunalls I d ' b% ; , i I i , , , 20 Reconstruction Conference 21 Ccnslrucbcn • 1 _ "_'._. .._f.. I...,_.-.-:, U° : . ' Project Description: Ridgecrest Road Discussion: This project involves reconstructing the existing roadway and constructing various drainage improvements. If needed, the widening of the existing cross-section of this road will be IDlimited to 1 to 2 feet. The design of this project is completed. The easements for drainage have been obtained and the contracts are being executed with the contractor. 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID TaskNane Duration MIAIMI JJIAISIOIN D JIFIM AIMIJjJJAISIOjNID JIFIMIAIM JIJIAISIO!NID JjFJMIAjMIJIJIAISIOINID 34 lOdgecrest Road I530d 4 . . . . . . . . . If' , : 35 Design 140d 100% . 36 Review Flans I 5d ©i : 100% i • ' 37 Obtain Right of Way 257d I `-10013 . . 38 Finalize Flans 10d G 100% 39 Advertise 21d I� '100% ; .• . 40 Counci Bid Award I 1d 0 i 11/17'. ; 41 Cblao Contract Documents I 15d . Hai i i 0%• : . : : ' 42 Reconstruction Conference 1d 0 . 12/0 i II 43 Construction I90d 6••-•-• •,.._i 0%' : Project Description: Continental Blvd.from Davis to Peytonville Discussion: The scope of this project involves reconstructing the roadway and improving the drainage along Continental. The roadway width will be increased in areas as needed at various intersections with side streets from subdivisions and in front of Carroll Elementary. At these locations, the roadway will be widened to three lanes. The design is complete. The, city has reviewed the plans . and is awaiting the geotechnical report before bidding the project. Construction is anticipated to take at least 180 days. S ,... 19 —tea .Vr- 1997 1999 ' 1999 2000 ID Task Nana0 Drratlon MIAIMIJIJIAISIDINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID 45 Cartinental Blvd 618d II , lrrrl rltlr ;`i illi • i II 46 Design 314d r- ‘ ; 100%; I ' ' { ! I r i 47 Review Flans 21d 1 I , . ' : , 100% ' 48 Cbtaei Right of Way _I___ Od . . O, 1210, ! : ; : 49 _ Fake cis — _ _ ,. 10d ' ' ; :(804 I ; : . . . . , . . , . . . . . 50 Advertise 21d Q Oy. 51 Cound Bid Award 1d j p 1113 i 1 52 Obtain Contract Documents : 15d . ' ' ' 0. AO%; • 53 ReconstmctionConference . 1d ': O :11' 54 Construction 18od ! ; 19%1 IIIII ! ' 111 : Project Description: Burney to Cul-de-sac Discussion: This project involves reconstructing the pavement from the cul-de-sac to approximately 1250' west along Burney. The construction project will begin in the near future. Construction is antici ated to take at least 90 days. 1997 19913 1999 2000 ID Task Name II)s lon MIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAIS OINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID 56 Burney to Cul-de-sac I 435d r 57 Design •150d o i • 100% ' 58 Review Bans • 15d ; : 4 ; ; 100% , _ 59 _.....Cbcaur wght of Way.__....__.._.,_...M.0d ; :0 ; . 60 Fnaf¢e flans 20d i i, . . ; 'Km ' . - •. • • 61 Advertise 121d t ; I ; i 10096 I ' 62 Counci Bid Award I id 1 1 HQ: 5€ : . 63 Obtaii Contract Documents I 15d GO 00%' : . 1 • ' 41) 64 Reconstruction Conference 1 1d 0 i _ ♦ . . : : . , , 65 Constructon 1 90d . . v, y A"b , . : . S.H. 114 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The State of Texas has recently committed to appropriating money over the next several years for the reconstruction of S.H. 114. Consequently, the City of Southlake must satisfy several agendas before the start of construction. The next few projects listed were funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget in order to carry out these agendas. • Project Description: Channel Improvements along the Jones Branch Discussion: Currently, Wal-Mart and the Village Center Development are detaining the runoff from their sites. The proposed R.O.W. for S.H. 114 along these developments is the land area, which these detention ponds presently occupy. These detention ponds will be eliminated for the reconstruction of S.H. 114. Before these detention ponds are eliminated, provisions must be made to the downstream properties in order to increase the capacity of the current Jones Branch. The City Council appropriated $25,000 for the FY1997-98 to fund the engineering and $475,000 will be appropriated in the FY19.9. 8-99 to fund the a construction and easement acquisition_of drainage improvements along the Jones Branch. These improvements must be accomplished before construction of S.H. 114 begins. The preliminary construction plans are being reviewed by 0 • 20 42�&5 Fr the city and the consultant is working with the Corps of Engineers and the TNRCC in order to 0 obtain the required permitting. Project Description: R.O.W. Acquisition at S.H. 114 and Dove St. Discussion: The city has committed to obtaining the additional R.O.W. required to build the future intersection of Dove St. and S.H. 114. The estimated cost for the appraisals, property, etc. is $1,500,000, which was funded for the FY1997-98. Project Description: Utility Relocation along S.H. 114 Discussion: The city must relocate the existing utilities, which are located in the S.H. 114 R.O.W. These utilities must be relocated prior to construction of S.H. 114. For the FY1997-98, an estimated $269,600 was required to relocate utilities before the first phase of construction begins (KimballlS.H. 114 intersection). The construction plans are being developed for the utility relocations at the Kimball/S.H. 114 intersection. MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Project Description: Heritage Business Park Infrastructure Improvements Discussion: The city is committed, through the Developer's Agreement, to reimbursing the developer for the oversizing of the water line along Kimball and the street improvements constructed in the Heritage Business Park. These reimbursements are estimated to cost $85,000 and were funded in the FY1997-98 CIP budget. SProject Description: Keller Water Meter Purchases for Southlake Residents on Keller Water Discussion: The City of Keller currently provides water service for approximately 250 residents of the City of Southlake. In order to transfer these customers to Southlake water, the city must purchase these water meters, water lines, etc. Therefore, the city proposes to transfer residents in the coming fiscal years in phases. For the FY1997-98, the city allotted $250,000 for the purchase of a number of meters. In the subsequent years, all residents of the City of Southlake will be transferred to Southlake water. III .., 21 S November 17, 1998 Council Meeting Minutes Due to technical difficulties with our computers, the Minutes will be delivered to Council members on Monday, November 30 at the Library interview session. • Thank you. 5-A City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 30, 1998 To: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, Deputy Director of Public Works Subject: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a developer agreement for Evergreen Estates Background Evergreen Estates is a residential subdivision containing 13 lots and is located in the southeast corner of North Kimball Avenue and Shady Lane. The public infrastructures being constructed in this addition includes water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and a public street. The developer of Evergreen Estates is not required to pay a Park Fee because the Park Board voted to allow credit for: 1) 450 linear feet of 6-foot sidewalk within the pedestrian easement (2,700 square feet). 2) 600 linear feet of 2-foot additional width along Shady Lane (1,200 square feet). 3) 620 linear feet of 2-foot additional width along North Kimball Avenue (1,240 square feet), for a total credit of 5,140 square feet of sidewalk. At the unit cost of$3.25 per square foot, this results in a total credit of$16,705 applied to the dedication requirement of$1,000 per lot for 13 lots, or $13,000. There are several revisions to the standard developer agreement that are highlighted and struck out. These changes are noted as follows: Page 1, General Requirements, Section B, will allow building permits to be issued after infrastructure listed on the agreement has been completed. The developer chose not to provide the usual requirements of Cash Escrow, Letter of Credit, Performance Bond, or Payment Bond. There are several struck-out sentences throughout the Agreement that refer to the requirements. Maintenance Bond requirements will remain the same. Allowing the developer to construct an addition without the above requirements has been done previously, as in the case of Myers Meadows and Napa Valley, Phase I and • II. 5B-1 Pr • Curtis E.Hawk Evergreen Estates Developer Agreement November 30, 1998 Page Two Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a developer agreement for Evergreen Estates. Please place this item on the December 1, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. (per.:4404„ CT/ts Attachment: Agreement Park Dedication Memo Plat Exhibit • M:\wd-files\projects\Evergreen Estates DA Memo.doc • 5B-2 • Pliry 114 EVERGREEN ESTATES \>' DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An Agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer", of Evergreen Estates, hereinafter referred to as the "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the 13 dots contained within the Addition and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. • B. ce the Developer is prepared to develop the Addition as rapidly as •. sible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residen building activity begin as quickly as possible and the City is desirous • having the subdivision completed as rapidly as possible, the C agrees to release 10% of the lots, , after installation of the : er and sewer mains. Framing shall not commence until water • ality is approved by the City and all appropriate Fire Code req -ments are satisfied, and street signs with street names are in place. emporary all-weather metal signs securely fastened in the ground a 4 cceptable until permanent street signs are installed. The Develo•-r recognizes that the remaining building permits or Certificates • Occupancy for residential dwellings will not be issued until th- upporting public works infrastructure including permanent street si•4s with block numbers and regulatory signs within the Addition ha - •een accepted by the City. This will serve as an incentive to t' Developer to see that all remaining items are completed. B. Upon the installation of water and sewer mains, the approval by the City of water quality, the satisfaction of.all.Fire Code requirements the installation of street signs with street names and`block numbers, and the completion of the streets, the Addition shell.be i accepted by the City as provided in Paragraph IE befowand building permits shall be available: 5B-3 C. If Developer desires to obtain building permits for the construction: of houses before the Addition is accepted, the Developer will present to the City either a'cash escrow, Letters of Credit, . performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All Letters of Credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. D. •e value of the performance bond, Letters of Credit or cash escro, ill reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been c• -••leted by the Developer and accepted by the City. Each request for - , ction or payment of escrow funds must be accompanied by lien re - = e(s) executed by all subcontractors and/or suppliers prior to the r- -se of escrow funds or reduction in • value of the account. Performance - • • •ayment bond, Letters of Credit or cash escrow from the prime con - or(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to the City, hereinafter re - ed to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's o• -tions specified above. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% of the construction cost for paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. If the Developer chooses to construct bar ditches in lieu of curb and gutter, and the City approved the design and grade of bar ditches, Developer understands and agrees to provide maintenance on the bar ditches for a period of two years from the date of acceptance of the Addition. Maintenance includes trash and debris cleanup, • mowing, and erosion control. 5B-4 Pr' E. erformance and payment bonds, Letters of Credit or cash escrow require ' raph C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said Additio eloper, save and except as.provided above. • S 5B-5 PP • c. , It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly authorized representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. SZ On all public facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for • which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for re-testing as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 5B-6 Pr" 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and acceptance by the City. 6 X The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses, hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonable maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the ® Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Should such cost remain unpaid for 120 days after notice, the City can file a lien on such property so maintained. / Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. ®�! Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 5B-7 V"" II. FACILITIES A. On Site Water The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service • lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. Drainage Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the City Engineer, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. The Developer hereby agrees to comply with all provisions of the Texas Water Code. C. LAW COMPLIANCE Developer hereby agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws that are applicable to development of this Addition. D. STREETS 1. The street construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. Streets will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications t be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. 5B-8 • 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a. Installation and two year operation cost of street lights, which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition; b. Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances; c. Installation of all regulatory signs recommended based upon the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices as prepared by the Developer's engineer by an engineering study or direction by the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features, however, should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. • 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and they City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer hereby agrees to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. 5B-9 E. ON SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain sewer lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. F. EROSION CONTROL During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be • implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the Developer's expense. All expenses must by paid to the City prior to acceptance of the Addition. G. AMENITIES It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street durniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association, or a homeowner. 5B-10 • H. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of0way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association, or a homeowner. The Developer and his successors and assigns understand that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by the.Developer's use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect the City against all such claims and demands. START OF CONSTRUCTION Before the construction of the streets, and the water, sewer, or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: • a inept and performance bonds must be submitted to the i of the City prior tothe commencement of any work: I. , At least six (6) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer must be submitted. 2, All fees required to be paid to the City. 3,,• Developer Agreement executed. 4. / The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance, naming the City as co- insured, prior to commencement of any work. 5, A pre-construction meeting between Developer and City is required. Developer or contractor shall furnish to the City a list of all subcontractors and suppliers, which will be providing greater than a $1,000 value to the Addition. 5B-11 III. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY AND ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, • SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES, OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it 410 being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, 5B-12 111111 • indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgement which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection herewith. D. This Agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonable withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employee a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being ® insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. F. Work performed under the Agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw on the performance bond, Letter of Credit, or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense, provided however, that if the construction under this Agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the Agreement with such renewed Agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. G. The City is an exempt organization under Section 151.309, Tax Code, and the facilities constructed under this Agreement will be dedicated to public use and accepted by the City upon acknowledgement by the City of completion under Paragraph 1.F. 1. The purchase of tangible personal property, other than machinery or equipment and its accessories, repair, and replacement parts, for use in the performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151, Tax Code, if the tangible property is: 5B-13 PP1' a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement; and b. completely consumed at the job site. 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. H. Prior to final acceptance of this phase the Developer shall provide to the City three (3) copies of Record Drawings of this phase, showing the facilities as actually constructed. Such drawings will be stamped and signed by a registered professional civil engineer. In addition, the Developer shall provide electronic files showing the plan and profile of the sanitary sewer, storm drain, roadway and waterline; all lot lines, and tie in to the state Plane Coordinate System. IV. OTHER ISSUES A. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE B. OFF-SITE WATER C. PARK FEES eloper agrees to pay the Park Fee of$1,000 pe , ' ccordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-F, Section 7.0. e roximately acres in Addition, which would bring the total cos o e to $ The Park Board voted to recommend a credit against the.Perk Fees for,the cost of two (2) additional feet of sidewalk along Kimball Avenue and for the cost of six (6)feet of sidewalk along the utility pedestrian easement near lots 1, 8 and.9 (if Developer elects to install such sidewalk)...The cost of the sidewalk/trail exceeds the. $13,000 Park,Fee, thereby offsetting the required Park Fee. 5B-14 tD. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-A. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Address: STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscrobed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public 40 My commission expires: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 5B-15 1Pv"' By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: a • 5B-16 PPP • REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The Letter of Credit may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the Letter of Credit. 3. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six percent (6%), and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against Letter of Credit must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining Letter of Credit. 9. Expiring Letter of Credit must be replaced by substitute Letters of Credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the Letter of Credit held by the City. M:1wd-files\projects\evergreen estates DA.doc S 5B-17 IIPPr - City of Southlake,Texas 0 MEMORANDUM November 6, 1998 TO: Charlie Thomas, Deputy Director of Public Works FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Park Dedication Requirements -- Evergreen Estates At its July 13, 1998 meeting, the Park Board considered the park dedication requirements for Evergreen Estates, formerly known as Pine Tree Estates. This being a residential development of 13 lots, the developer was required to pay fees of$1,000/lot for a total of$13,000. The developer requested a credit towards these fees for sidewalk/trail construction. The Park Board voted to allow credit for (1) six feet of width for sidewalk along pedestrian/utility easement in Lots 1, 8, and 9; and (2) two additional feet of width (above the 4' wide sidewalk required by the Subdivision Ordinance) for sidewalk along Kimball Avenue and Shady Lane. Based on information provided by the developer, this results in: (1) 450 linear feet of 6-foot sidewalk within the pedestrian easement (2,700 square feet), • (2) 600 linear feet of 2-foot additional width along Shady Lane (1,200 square feet), (3) 620 linear feet of 2-foot additional width along Kimball Avenue (1,240 square feet); for a total credit of 5,140 square feet of sidewalk. At a unit cost of$3.25 per square foot, this results in a total credit of$16,705 applied to the dedication requirement of$13,000. The Park Board voted 6-0 to recommend credit for sidewalk/trail construction as noted. In addition, the developer committed to construct a sidewalk along Yeargain Court to a width of 6 feet. He received no credit for any portion of this sidewalk. Please contact me or Park Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry if you have any questions. KH III 5B-18 • 01 • . • North ` 3 I s I Note. \ a o.n, af all corner lots •I �/, • r 5'3 91 tn.`L�:;s cdn.. ad. rs.:"': 'j r n ,A• a .ul rent•.and. I. o• r wont triangles • --7—•-- —'.._. �`�`-a_� ^ �� =I I / I .... .. I _ .. -__...._ 1 ]J I[, _, / D."� c. _�J i / .,r ir.li'i .:.did This Site..••..., `t.riV• L.. r', I it I I / I I 1 I I I . I I I I / Lra�a•.ss.wr -1 ti I r .. / _ 1 nit. G i, _I._.._.I_ 1/ J.war t `` - ,- —Coi�:..rt ,N;. I._.. _ .L _ r .,,,I rr._Y..,..A l..r, ,:,.. ,... ^ NJOB a��@l� t�lo+�l�i© :ItlB26'U2•V 929AI -' �—_ -•. a.t - I seole I' 2000' �% lY cdnwy'n'— j9 \ '... a P.- 3 ?I 2 �? 542','u•C s.para.tl �- I� •$ Ij20.000 SF a0,000 SF 20,000 SF 1 I; P.-Inlet.11en•._---.__-- w.tr M_r. '� ig ^ ^ ( ��6�1 30,000 SF I=`r bete. - -- — --- • crc.antral Inc .. i .. !.L'• I.I. :.I:LI 1!:..L I N90'00'00•C I Prr'nn Nm, , ..__.- „:.,,.,„,•: a♦,,,, .r.1.3 10110. I' 117.41 124/0 131132 210.14 -^ — ._..._.......... .., .i I 12B.92 :20.7d 1 12030 233.32 oo�."__. -•--•--- • ....r.......= e.....�.. .. ,. I P;el I It 'VA r • :'Jn:Jeao._.,a or r...a • _....., . ...., .,.. . .• I ml ,l 5 _ 7 23,237 SF �: s ; t w' . • - : ,,ri.:. ..,.. I 2�l7 YI '�21,667 SF c^ 20,000 SF 8 tr — — .V 1• .....r..,..=rµ''..u....•......'.. ar is".•..'•�...r.r I al _ Iµr I� _ _ I ._ _ - — \t,ryy10 .tr .-.-unr _ _. __ .i:...�............. - .Wong. 'J CO ( t , —.._.._.....I of l u 1Ji 91 .i_ 't JB' adlti - \ (� 1 m �.a`'ya---.,rc.,. --- .1 P I,s.,r ut. aria t<•I -�•��'' •6�•' - 9 I � 32,13 w � 5.1��7t �'D6�PQI .....w... ...................w, r.. ... ...... ..... 1 I �z»a_..-� -------- Jzxaa-•----, it • • cJw _�_�- N it t`P _� w 7y y w. .' ..,.. '...,.. . .,. • N I I� $W °11 77N. /lace . . .. . . I 'o ;y 13 12 8 tda t'c .r. I3 I Z •P 20.000 SF- ''0,000 SF=F 20,000 SF 2 k 10 S . 1:Z171, I.........._., I 1 = .S I�• (3�OGI11 9 21.600 SF 1' •• a Ili I 11 a v• a; : - - - - - . _ I III12,.,• 12500 12500 P267t o ,. .......:::::r.... .... /' I ttJ-r N9U 00'00'W 638.05 / " �:.r���..... .�., 1 . .. ...., _ .-,r _..; 1i • PO®�� 1 / j I / j ii a 13 lot addition to the City of Southlake ISL.Ltd (Panel e.Lap PC. ti 1•. Tarrant County, Texas 4435 L�J r 1;91 0.,`°"• Y B]D n.o'Cr r....76013 _ •' •'l a tract or tend:mv,yd tie 6.51..Ltd•according to the dead ]aloe,rue•77244 YI7/271.3431 devemtd a NC Car canon - 4-77, r•, rant Coup ,J/L 7d7.7110 - ------- "'� fti19YC_•pe4l4i__S1:ilrjLtT N �f AwIN4'.. Q�4r� an Page of Vol..vawi. .Deed Records, y.r•.o, su•.,ror� •-' ... _ .Y1n a.-OBY.ra, rL.rota t, ' _ .I'.r:', '?•.: r. _-f2 g1.. IIIJ'.d.1re J"1'1'll• n all Y.JD4 acres out rr M.S.7r,•wan Survey,/.b,traCt M6]2] Pte,1 MKS . '2n.IJ .d q/.__..CI 'i16J n7]•17:0•'. 27'.:,�'_. y' C.n.n .40 Y. ..•„Plod Ga,- ---- 1 .. .I. _.1 N_ _ _ Torrent County,Tomas vr0wa L.r.argan ! to lei .� I. r.; I->n6 '.0000'-91 IS @•i2- sdzron...• - .1 0an6/91 'el derwaay Bill 2 7W.0 Uano, r....i]067 017/2L7-12i9 I I:t Sa:1J d.:?" l:.`'1 3I.y: IWD•;:l'?.0'L 1•Je"10.7u• 017,777 7fi]J B17/]17979 lfa,l I rJiY lw.isr—___—__ - ._...._ __N 1:fl -. _ _.-_-..-� __O aJ._-vn]n Ll_i- _dl�)3:�':. it i'n.ai , ! L __.._—._._ .--. ---- -.—.—_—.----. THd Plat Mad C Calen•t _—.S:IC.,..___..Data -- .'.A9f3-040 pirCity of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 30, 1998 To: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, Deputy Director of Public Works Subject: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a commercial developer agreement for Southlake Oaks, Phase II Background Southlake Oaks, Phase II, Lot 2, Block 1 is the second phase of the commercial development known as 1709 Southlake Oaks Addition. The addition is located in the northeast corner of the intersection of West Southlake Boulevard and Shady Oaks Drive. The only public infrastructure to be installed is an 8-inch water line and a small amount of storm sewer. The developer of Southlake Oaks, Phase II paid the required Park Fee at the time Phase I was developed. The City will collect the appropriate water, sewer and street impact fees when the building permits are issued. The requirements are incorporated into the agreement and this agreement is standard with no unusual requests or variances. Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a commercial developer agreement for Southlake Oaks, Phase II. Please place this item on the December 1, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. Cetrbooe PPLcs-ca14—.—' CT/ts Attachment: Agreement Plat Exhibit M:\wd-files\projects\Southlake Oaks\Southlake Oake II DA Memo.doc 5C-1 ply • . ® SOUTHLAKE OAKS, PHASE II COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer", of Southlake Oaks, Phase II, hereinafter referred to as "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to Addition (a commercial development) and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the S City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all the public facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the subdivision if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds should be approved by a Best- rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond, letter of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letter of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to the City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-2 pir • • to the City The Developer agrees to furnish maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20% of the cost of construction of underground public utilities and 50% for the paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two (2) years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. D. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove, which are intended to be public facilities, shall be vested in the City of Southlake, and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities for this provision and for the entire Agreement shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager of his duly appointed representative, provides Developer with a written 111 acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. E. On all public facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water , street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-3 pr. c. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said 1111 water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and acceptance by the City. F. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer for reasonable costs. Such amount shall become a lien upon all real property of the subdivision so maintained by the City, and not previously conveyed to other third parties, 120 days after Developer has notice of costs. G. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 410 Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-4 H. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City of Southlake. J. The Developer agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. II. FACILITIES A. ON-SITE WATER The Developer herebyagreesto install p tal water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of Addition to the City of Southlake. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of buildings, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the buildings. • Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-5 pr • . B. DRAINAGE Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS The street construction in the Addition, commercial development of the City of Southlake will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. 1. The Developer will be responsible for: 4111 a) Installation and two year operation of street lights; b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances; c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended based upon the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as prepared by the Developer's engineer by an engineering study or direction of the Director of Public Works. S Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-6 2. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City of Southlake. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre- planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer has agreed to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street • construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of Addition to the City of Southlake. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials, engineering, permits and Impact Fees. In the event that certain sewer lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. S Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-7 Iry • E. EROSION CONTROL During construction of the subdivision and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the subdivision at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the subdivision. F. AMENITIES It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the ® Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. • Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-8 G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer understands that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION Before the construction of the water, sewer, streets or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: ® 1. Approved payment and performance bonds submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to commencement of any work. 2. At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer. 3. All fees required by the City to be paid to the City. 4. The Developer, or Contractor, shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. 5. A Pre-Construction Meeting to be held with all Contractors, major Sub-Contractors, Utilities and appropriate Government Agencies. S Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-9 pr. • • III. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS, OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY AND ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, • SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. 411 Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-10 C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any ® suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, ® agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This Agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer awards his or her own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. In addition, the Developer, or Contractor shall furnish the payment and performance bonds in the name of the City prior to the 11111 commencement of any work hereunder and shall also furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance. Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-11 F. Work performed under the Agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw down on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense; provided, however, that is the construction under this Agreement shall have been started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the Agreement with such renewed Agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. IV. OTHER ISSUES A. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE B. OFF-SITE SEWER C. OFF-SITE WATER D. PARK FEES 1111 The Developer agrees to pay the Park Fee of$1,000 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-F, Section 7.0. There are approximately acres in Addition, which would bring the total cost of Park Fees to $ E. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-A. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: 1111 Address: Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-12 • STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. -• Notary Public (SEAL) My commission expires: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: • Southlake Oaks,Phase II • Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-13 Fir • REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The Letter of Credit may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six (6%) percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against Letters of Credit must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining Letter of Credit. 9. Expiring Letter of Credit must be replaced by substitute Letters of Credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the Letter of Credit held by the City. S Southlake Oaks,Phase II Commercial Developer's Agreement 5C-14 • 0510 TOM • .00022.R.ell b 12l MID, • •,l Mr"1.a•.•..r r~(Km 4 Ma Kane.y;••••••wr• •r®�rt na ., a:yna w �rY,ter�10 lN+na amil�ss own Mr..r. • v Pa ru•Teal anal M.K....0 1.. M .. ��Lrrava ten.20...1.�m•.n ani9rnY Lrnv tr naa••M a0 M.O.Vaasa.I 2.rs.wr[uw•iY AN.4V�Y '''•" 1.-On.'.,-M —�-- �- , as ,","�12.;��O&.1 - `em" . ,L r1a ..vva. .4 WY rn N " '' am, ...,.,.3J-s> n """\7l = .r:�. or a ..r . " i �..aN, am n .a.-..,ra,° o.... _ nr.. •r.•r •a•na " G.a ✓'y!I vet a 1.. STIR a IW�1 •._a.a•.,nv - - -' - - ran r•7 arenas V KIK E.t.amap 0 E. dr..,.V •0 01. 1....• a urn,S Ona Dart,:dfll�S•f/alfi_ oa,�.m......a..•,man,.a e•n•�..noc Soma W.I. ..,r a.••,.Kt. ,«n,r .. a..". x oaa c ma caa•....„norm...•T Ks• a.una.ma ...,;ra ,i a r•�..�ron�,...slaps. von,Tana... mmYa'r'Kama r•KK:.'.. ...."`a�' .eoeMa`A Km a.Kars aa•...a. b •. ' .Vita m. ary I , .rw_. 0. .r"n°a�.mar.n a,...a... ...arr " m.KKK WK..w.+_..w..__ ..o,rr KO Km r oar sr ran..o.••..r.rw.w..ran ns•r�r-«r ami a+'KKK Os.laK °a'+n r..•...a.0.mr ar ma w al•w n nw Srw air[n�a„a n I.min mar,n.r.a.c>.+.:r n a. -�- .q�._.._.._.._.._.._..� .,aanaa•,t.•f•srr.ari am.rre.,w•ma r,rNr-•.. ]N.mrt•a+ SWJ ,.no �(a near n b aoA aa.SM,f.,_•..r me ••aft .ml m•m1 n.o r K.z,Vast 0.•N3,•�.+r 04.5..- •vas I , '.'a. ' •, , ' m'r..e,tor.�,'r..m,a..MM..,rxn"'r.., II*' i ' ,: 1101 loon■oar fl rvr.u L. W r,r •'•_r-• :rap awoa •ter I. �j,{�! n.Kassa of T•r_, Ka" ass, 4n-.r• ,�,• ._. r. aart z s[n..c w mnarc ..® ' j a•.na.�srm..r r.o._.._ wv nw.r..sa an t.a..,oa aw ST.RV ,• , K:.a+W.•Lana I I mar•a,(l(6(6✓ • ' vrtm COT.uR '�( '< IOW•L Me KKK..KIK,.-r .nm V.001 I oar Case, TNau sNra n rr. ' '• ' 1 I arw a O•ra•a4rar A.r..•a•l•s b m.fro.."T no- .iAm a.WI: •aoaw 1Na..rral�ry."noon`I+ n q nut er,b.r .. i• i ..??1,.,M.saw`•..n me.•tie KKK,KKK e.011.0 awn..• • min.a a�. ITKal Kr Kam"m:•n`00.a..••:r i wb9 abn.l r•,n,aM-aq vY N,N env.Y•• LA, ,,11 • i� • i 11�vOr�n a a..r".1-7 ,up,�••M,�n Inn' -_ r f MI n.m.f"'ma ar nlLr K. APPROVED BY Tat PLIANMG\ TONIC CO1,i.swR 1 I' b a6oer • cm a sar•aw /MyI t[��e[w[i DATE. �T► _,__Y [t 1 lb , • sn.a LJc�.x1,199U ' dL �,I { I.L._• I Z 'I r+nrr.. .•.Ara T '` C RE ...a am i DKr.. ..,,. m r POB •%•m Kas.1... r.';1a(/o! - .a c TAR+ yr, r 0 u1lo. un O� �•---•-•--••--•----•--•-••-».-•-- - --•S BO'S1V4 E ,, KW 75171• ,. 4,1 r Jam•.., aI ,.a,,.'.".,-. d'.. ' ,..,''. .d. LOT1 , z z••DYsa•E - _. - • �'r^ 11 100.000 SO FEET n•;;:xi '\•'.� z9.u• En y. z'• !a 0 i .b '\ •, A•x2L36-11 ! Nii 2957 ACRES i4:io LOT 2 •. R.x7q.ar • N tr.. .,,,a,..•.I•..ana a,r Yaw.,r• �-?e5n 81,392 SO FEET cR�BB�G 51311'sx•E ' .11i a ;,g,i,, 1,9685 ACRES l CABO T Im76 FOC �.'- - -•m°°i • /M I. 01 •ii •A RIJIi:• r.rof,+u.ru.r. • I V I a o I u, ..ore. .amLe .21.224.2 MI ..l.ra13"-...� ..+•�. Kos .n. .wt 3 it!,ii .a.,«•.a u...Ara., i.h.� ,.A.....a..I Ara m ,o,,,a.a•a..s.,r..• Ir1 °;l i a"s •r:L,a .,.a••.Tor r`x i �.N I (ar,.,.w ! 11 -i. I11i •O Ianrr,nx i� lI 1i i a•r.,x...a �� �� •' iN I ' 11 r•r a:o.a rsw s.r • I: a r'.arras,. jz _ _ .e "• i - m I _ i®m0.0 1169.•9' ._..-..-..-.yr T-'--_.._.._.. • _ _ •unmans, S a - a,4 ••• KKK. TTM INI OK.Lull...I I lG,f SKIMS a,ICCORIMK ••• "' T.OTT 1LKKK. . i 1 F.M.HIGHWAY 1709 SOUTHLAKE•BLVD1 "' - ••..a•,.,,. I_._-._.._.. T 1mM,w . aM.,a •xa p=so• • • t:x _ _ = 4.1642 ACRES 'ate' LOT land 2 BLOCK 1 • ...e a 1,r7, • ' ' 1709 SOUTHLAKE OAKS ADDITION Y a AN ADDITION TO THE CITY CF M CRT V SOAK"KUM"TIC VAT TO KOK moor!MSS ICON /• „I-qrr,era i'l `.I ! nn.r.Ms s,aa,for cwr..n An«,l.s.onroa rrE r.aa,Cil`,•TOr6 SOOTHLAKE,TEXAS SIO.M.PC LIm,y rK WST f1A.eaf Man.TOa.val•Gl[.r-1C,T.( II y 'I *Mu• 054.•nn...•r alsoo IC uaaTa(0 Vasa. Iw .7oa"MK. LIT'L=BERRY C.ROLL SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO.6a6 • 1 ' TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS I �� • I; Ks..-w v,Y se LOT n,a•1.1 KOK sT A:E5.a0?MKS FOR 1 '/ V.as•w ran-.a LIRE:REST il.B0T,5pC LJ 6.r4.tOa`Y Sf.rC J/.,OTC(r,'KKK MO 1 YA.4C:'O•KS r�` = " •Ma• — W Ij ""° """""I °""`KaTi 1709 SOUTHLAKE OAKS LTD .... • ' g ' ONE GALLERIA TOWER.SUITE 2400,DALLAS TX 75240 '............... I ' a.U4101 a COMA LOT l • E,I KCAS mAlf,SK. 5 SITES Pc.0O3 R.NC4.a.•.Io,,,MOPI ' %!.I no.SOOTra-ar.[o.3 LTO AI IA}sl.Or OAK LTVsT•rE nu[coaa«.f[s s.sm a,...TN PM sr•f.. CMCOLONTwoL vrrt l.00 MOLoo•Lro To KM TM •a1M0ST rt•!•Oren( O0L•5 r[uL,sag ...a.r illAi MTV MILK ]SII! Mat TN.(T•-rSfooM �L%cast -Iq u,C [ IC iT•TW O OoO [ • MS RAT ED M CAME' LIP---DATE•Mat x4[n•P aro,5..1 ,IpAT}L,fY City of Southlake,Texas . MEMORANDUM November 24, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for moving Monticello Information Center to Bob Jones Park. At its October 12 meeting, the Park Board approved the donation of the Monticello Information Center for use as a Nature Center at Bob Jones Park. This approval was contingent upon the selection of a suitable site by the Nature Center Committee. On Sunday, October 25, Park Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry met at Bob Jones Park with Nature Center Committee members to determine a location for the donated building from Mr. Terry Wilkinson. The committee determined a location that would be suitable and would be accessible in the near term. At the time Mr. Wilkinson offered the donation, he estimated the cost of moving the trailer to Sbe approximately $7,000 to $8,000. Now that a location has been selected, we have begun getting quotes from moving firms. There has been a large difference between the verbal quotes received so far, from $20,000 to $8,500. Because of this disparity, staff requests authorization to advertise for bids, in the event the cost exceeds the $15,000 state law limits. We are working with Mr. Wilkinson as far as the time frame for moving the building, but two weeks ago, he did not seem to be concerned that it be moved in the immediate future. It is our belief he will work with us regarding the timing, but we also are sensitive to his need to make the lot the Center is on, available for home construction. Staff also recommends that concrete piers be poured on which to place the structure to increase stability. We estimate this cost to be approximately $3,000, depending on how many piers are necessary. There will also be a cost for utility service to the building, which we are still reviewing and will bring forward at a later date. The approved 1997-98 SPDC budget allowed $20,000 for planning of the nature center. Although it would be prudent to allocate funds for architectural design and development of a concept plan for the nature center, we recommend that this money be used to cover the costs of moving this building in order to begin the implementation of the Nature Center project. Additional funding for architectural design could be reallocated from any cost savings on other projects at Bob Jones Park, or perhaps donations to the Nature Center Committee could also offset the design costs. It is staff's understanding that the Nature Center Committee would like to see the entire project built with donated funds and/or donated labor and materials. -41° r 1 • Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager November 24, 1998 Page 2 Staff requests you place this item on the regular agenda for consideration by City Council at their December 1 meeting. SPDC moved this item to their consent agenda and approved it unanimously at their November 23 meeting. In the event the bids are less than $15,000, we request authorization to move forward with the low bid as soon as feasible. If the bids received are greater than $15,000, then we will bring the award of bid back to SPDC and City Council for their consideration. Please contact me or Park Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry if you have any further questions. KH Attachment: Proposed Site location of Nature Center at Bob Jones Park S • i • W . 1 .J . = / L_" e- iImo . /^• iI ,. I 1 j I 1' 1 Iv ' a r I I p I Ie 1� f'') `1 I, \ ` \ 1 � .'"� \ 1 I . , A \ \ \\f � „. I (' ,,'J.,.. . . o -A, `f - • ' - — _ l _ ' --, \,,\- \ \ ..---.:-- -- , ,<i-',-,' ..' --="V_ 'Ns__ thmi - . • ���� �'c%,l� `rid \� i __\ N.�`I!\ \ • 1111 V-I1 IIIII11111(IIIgIl ►31 #4l€�Ij• _ f`N.,., goy-- !a..�`I ��, y 1\ . \ -- - ' 1, :.- if k",�_ �� i�-�� v�®nwv - �1_ ,��\\\\ ►�'►\\1 Il\\\\ \ \� l ' 1 \\11l l A 04'41 - 1 lerninN bb"Iftek404,1 \ 1,1 kV, -11),7t)ii II Rini-kjiVILMillff/ Ali.:4Ztillire \).... d\Ma ' 4,1\ 441,11110,W4h. 11 . j i g I . 1 r •4.44.PI 1707A-\-. 4:,trA4 ,4arielitiliT—Ig .` N' i___N..44......_,-- ..., ../ / r A _mliiii - oglimg -Nii:._......‘...........4 ...N.W,..„,-, Ar W i.p.rw..o.4..:v--k.. _ .11-.4, - Viirr.t.4 MAL ..A.l t. - )1.livittlk _ilk kali j � `� Z: r 112-10/0",iititirt 10, AN, ---'.-- _••1,1 -Ns.- .---... ro‘ .t.i.N,„„„,,,,,,.........:9,_ MO-,.,,,.,0•dr-t\.-;,• ...4 0 " fi' .. . I 1 ."" .'" i /Alit 19 41 a I Si 4! ( a sit . tin LA rii ill '..-. \l'il 41 kr. ... 1):"..741L‘ 2,;614 OA '''.°--i"-- „Pitig: .7 ,. ::_.: if „r" ,, ,,v ,, :. ir ., - - A Iiiiiu 614, 4 4,11f- 4till I ..k. ...Awe. , ). 0-......„--. 11, LI 41‘ - -- „.1 :\..,N,i,flo::1../.1. -..,1 ------ 0 - .I‘ *1,12._..,,,,01 --ki,,,,61 .. ...44 b_ .'-'- v- \___ i'ir -'4V ,_..„ ..-_-,4 , '41 1 -. wu .----TC47tri 61 4( Ai 4140 ION r. - -: t _.....Nic\ti ._:, 1 ..- —. ' • - �• \\ gyp!) 773--4-\\X __\ 1%...-- --6) '; Fir 9 ' -' :oi�i►•�r-- F:cre - `_ t45, �. isOr 11" Al Q tr._ les'--- \ ellik V4I ikto W pl) Ili ri "1 S' / -.•Lr5 ram` �+.�� T,t4ta .,\V '--- --.. .":":-.1.. )0'151 ... .. --.-re----- c:. ....1/4. y .-.. . ilpii iii . it . - 1, ? _%..--_:) �_ . _ _- �_- . - . izp,4 7-. .* \ fir�. . -/ ) V �/it 2 � `t.'z^--. -- l°t, Vim.'r� ��Pi. � \\ . tii :IT _____ --.'",w io 7 ,N, .'iiiita\- . / • - -.. -----:::-.....i . . • - • • • 7,---7---;,--------.7) 111.11 4/ .3.), . 1.. .4,..0„i,,,,,,,s,‘- km, . • . -' r. 4 . , , .k ....:-. i . \. . .., ,P4(i) - I ••••• -- ..r.) \----__:--,...----/ / - ../ . ".-7. ;-• • ---- / , 1 • fl ,i ,\ Igsf4 -.v, .,•-,4 ,,. •••• . , 1 . \ .. „ •••• //,./•-/,- 1. • 1////• _. ,.p 11 ' \N h . rv.... . i�' i- prCity of Southlake,Texas f' MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of bid to Circle H Contractors for the installation of sanitary sewer in the Cedar Creek Plantation Addition • Background Cedar Creek Plantation Addition is scheduled to receive sanitary sewer improvements this year as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Program as shown-in the CIP budget. The design of the proposed sanitary sewer was completed during the previous fiscal year. The total estimated construction cost for the project is $110,400. The construction is proposed to be funded from the 1998-1999 capital improvements budget. The low bidder for this project is Circle H Contractors with a base bid $74,675.85. The attached bid • tabulation provides additional bids and costs. Recommendation Staff recommends Council award the contract to Circle H Contractors for the installation of sanitary sewer in Cedar Creek Plantation Addition in the amount of $74,675.85. Please place this item on the December 1, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/sep Attachments: Bid Tabulations Map Exhibit • 5E-1 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO. 001-452 CHEATHAM & ASSOCIATES BID TABULATION SHEET 1 OF 1 W OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Circle H Contractors Gra-Tex Utilities Co. Saber Development H&W Utility Contractors P.O.Box 281 529 County Line Rd. P.O.Box 540186 305 Main Street JOB TITLE: CEDAR CREEK PLANTATION Midlothian, TX 76065 Whitesboro, TX 76273 Dallas, TX 75354 Lake Dallas, TX 75065 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PHONE: 972/723-0802 PHONE: 903/564-6776 PHONE: 972/438-3405 PHONE: 940/321-5158 PROJ.MGR: ROBERT ROWLEY FAX: 972/723-5308 FAX: 903/564-6776 FAX: 972/438-2849 FAX: 940/321-5160 AMT.BID: $74,675.85 AMT.BID: $127,117.60 AMT.BID: $146,450.50 AMT.BID: $146,719.31 BID DATE: November 10,1998 JOB NO. 001-452 ITEM PLAN UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. PRICE COST PRICE COST PRICE COST PRICE COST 1 8"SS(SDR-35)IN 0'-6'TRENCH L.F. 32.65 25.00, $816.25 48.00 $1,567.20 75.00 $2,448.75 69.70 $2,275.71 2 8"SS(SDR-35)IN 6'-8'TRENCH L.F. 229.00 27.50 $6,297.50 58.00 $13,282.00 78.00 $17,862.00 72.50 $16,602.50 3 8"SS(SDR-35)IN 8'-10'TRENCH L.F. 389.85 29.00 $11,305.65 68.00 $26,509.80 81.00 $31,577.85 74.10 $28,887.89 4 8"SS(SDR-35)IN 10'-12'TRENCH L.F. 167.70 32.50 $5,450.25 88.00 $14,757.60 85.00 $14,254.50 78.60 $13,181.22 5 CONST.8"BORED CROSSINGS L.F. 217.00 50.00 $10,850.00 85.00 $18,445.00 110.00 $23,870.00 145.00 $31,465.00 6 CONST.8"BORED CROSSING W/16"STEEL CASING L.F. 95.00 85.00 $8,075.00 175.00 $16,625.00 175.00 $16,625.00 175.00 $16,625.00 7 4"SS MANHOLES(0'-6'DEPTH) EA. 6.00 1500.00 $9,000.00 1500.00 $9,000.00 1300.00 $7,800.00 1250.00 $7,500.00 8 CONST.EXTRA DEPTH OF STD.4"MH V.F. 20.00 100.00 $2,000.00 150.00 $3,000.00 110.00 $2,200.00 110.00 $2,200.00 9 SHORT SS SERVICE INC.BORING EA. 7.00 500.00 $3,500.00 325.00 $2,275.00 250.00 $1,750.00 590.00 $4,130.00 N 10 LONG SS SERVICE INC.BORING EA. 7.00 1250.00 $8,750.00 1500.00 $10,500.00 2900.00 $20,300.00 720.00 $5,040.00 11J 11 TRENCH SAFETY L.F. 1131.20 1.00 $1,131.20 5.00 $5,656.00 2.00 $2,262.40 10.00 $11,312.00 U7 12 EROSION CONTROL SYS. L.S. 1.00 2500.00 $2,500.00 500.00 $500.00_ 500.00 $500.00 2500.00 $2,500.00 13 PRE-BID ALLOWANCE FOR ADJUST. L.S. 1.00 5000.00 $5,000.00 5000.00 $5,000.00 5000.00 $5,000.00 5000.00 $5,000.00 TOTAL BID AMOUNT $74,675.85 S127,117.60 $146,450.60 $146,719.31 (ITEMS 1-13), _ L • 1110 4110 Pry . • • .,,, • _.:„ _ ,..., . . . ..., I / I • . ,'. DOVERC.; No. 3080) C-1-) i ...____._, ..• ____ • WEST DOVESTRe== _______ , „.__ _-7.7:7:___.'"---:---- -- • --•— ' "- , ...--. —.- --I---,•.. . ' • : • : E..- , • • • • . . ' ..: • .•• : . ! . • ; : : . . • , . . : , • ;., .• • ; • •• _r____T, . •-... _F_o_atN_I N1_2 • (44 (-1 kiv. • • , ...-, ••• , - ---- ...--- • ,It_=;k...) . A Li _ • . ,. fe" ""---% -^. • :•••••-•, "•-,. q -..- ....., „ _ _ _ . _.... , . ._______ jr-__ ,... -, - - • ------- ..,... ,....,:ft'',....) . ! , i • ,....; ......./ . . p : . . _____,, . . • . . : ,--> 7-LH • LNE •: •• • / t r••:, ..---I , , • . 1. .„\-._)---.., ‘....1 -::„ 1 . — -----------. yi 7 1, ..," : -,....„, ` ! r., „,.. C Gtj t 1 .•. „ • EX 1ST I No!--SWER OUTFALL • ; , 1 r"- \ I L1 I • • ,,/ . . k u .. /1 3RI-T-T-AN-Y__;:f I i.. • ___z•— ; ' I - —-- —— • 1 I -..----. Iiii-A.:-C-7 '7111----h:1 .; i • — ._••••; .,.._ r -----fi . . . • . • . • . . • 7- •• • i__ 1 v.- i / • . .. : . . -.cil -- ` --------7! __ Ar----.- CZ A . Ni N 0 IN 1 ,-, 1 1 k•-) 1.--- t_ ,. i ..... ,.. . ,.... A „.... „..., _ , \i .____ • ___ i \ ' EX [STING SEWER 01.11F:-‘LL 1, .- ..- ...- i \ • - . 'ii..\ : : • • .. : ..-- c..‘E 1.)n: v 8"I ; CI"di :8'of 1 8" . - . ' ,,,, ./, ., ., ,...• --8 .._____, : _ _ __ __ _r - ' ; 1-- i Ion, 0. I .•'.---.. : .,2-K. L.----=r A T 1"4 ---i-- ------. ; • . ,A .1' ' ' I ; -.r'' 1 • _____ i i . • N •• ' • . ;; A • i < . , / -"*"-----EX IST ING SEWER OUTFALL I , . ,. .. - , • >•'- ,,i- . .• ,- , .• • ! •,___________::_____r___L.__ . ., . .: i • --,....... o , • , • • . 1 r, • :• L j__________ . ... • t"=-4'.70' (APPROX.) ---. • '\.)r\il it ... - . . . •-..• - TFR,A/L 4 Csi P NC •ETi _ . 7.---- . .. .1... Pi s A 1-0-iySti -......^en es A: . ,CR-E_EIC ,t11. ANTAT , •-. ..., , a*i- Ir- l 11-------n :-..*:— .. .."1 / ! 1 • , i - 4, . i City of South lake,Texas • MEMORANDUM November 30, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-76, Urging the Texas Legislature to increase appropriations for road and bridge maintenance and expansion Background The Texas Depaitiiient of Transportation has indicated that only one-third of the State's transportation needs will likely be addressed over the next ten years without increased funding. While the State and the DFW Area will benefit from the increase in federal funding as a result of recent federal legislation, the State will need additional funds in order to provide the State match for these federal dollars. Recommendation 4110 In response to this need, the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) and the North Pg P Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Executive Board have adopted the Regional Policy Position on State Transportation Funding Issues for reflection during the State's next legislative session. This policy position calls for the Legislature to address the need for additional adequate transportation funding and they have asked member cities to adopt the attached resolution. Although the need for increased State transportation funding has been clearly defined, additional support will be needed if we are to make progress on this initiative. The attached resolution encourages the Texas Legislature to provide for increased funding in the upcoming session. BW/tjh C� Attachments: Resolution No. 98-76 Policy Position D:1Word Files\r&bfunding.doc 5F-1 411 RESOLUTION NO. 98-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, URGING THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE TO INCREASE APPROPRIATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND EXPANSION. WHEREAS, road and bridge maintenance and expansion is a core function of government; and, WHEREAS, mobility is fundamental to Texas economic vitality and quality of life; and, • WHEREAS, maintaining mobility requires a continuing investment of State resources to maintain and expand the surface transportation infrastructure to meet identified needs; and, WHEREAS, an estimated 78 percent of the roads and bridges in Texas need repair or modernization, and Texas ranks 45th nationally per capita in highway spending and first in the nation in substandard bridges; and, WHEREAS, current-level appropriations to the Texas Department of • Transportation (TxDOT) are adequate to only address one-third of the identified Texas transportation needs; and, WHEREAS, increased appropriations to TxDOT are necessary to continue State-funded road and bridge maintenance and construction programs that simultaneously leverage the maximum amount of federal funding for which Texas is eligible from the Transportation Equity Act for the 21" Century; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the 76th Texas Legislature is urged to increase annual appropriations to the Texas Department of Transportation by (a) funding the Department of Public Safety from a source other than Fund 006 so that Fund 006 resources will be available to maintain and expand road and bridge infrastructure, (b) moving the point of collection of State motor fuel taxes from the retail to the wholesale level in the distribution process, (c) expanding 2060 truck permit fees and penalties to reduce the passenger vehicle subsidy of oversize and overweight freight vehicles, and (d) increasing revenue programs including State motor fuel tax and vehicle registration fees. 5F-2 • Resolution No. 98-76 Road and Bridge Appropriations Page two Section 3. That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the offices of the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Chairman of the Texas Transportation Commission, and the chairs of the following legislative committees: Senate Appropriations, House Committee on Transportation, House Committee on Ways and Means, and House Select Committee on Revenue and Public Education Funding. Section 4. This resolution is effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Mayor Rick Stacy • ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary D:\Word Files I 98-76RES.doc S 5F-3 V ,. ATTACHMENT 1 .- : r North Central Texas Council of Governments 'f of k _ ENst %. L'J Regional Transportation Council -' , IIM I* ''' September 1998 ., The Regional Transportation Council and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) recognize the need for funding a strong multimodal surface transportation system. The support, •Y coordination, and cooperation of federal, state, regional, and local governments and transportation authorities is needed to achieve this system. Therefore, the Regional Transportation Council and NCTCOG adopt this: Regional Policy Position on State Transportation ^X . Funding Issues for Consideration During the 76th Texas Legislative Session While the State of Texas and its metropolitan areas continue to experience unprecedented economic growth. our transportation system is deteriorating and metropolitan congestion levels continue to rise. Adequate funding to support needed maintenance and expansion of the transportation system is not in - ; S place. On a statewide basis, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) will likely only be able to meet one third of the State's transportation needs over the next ten years. Given current funding levels, the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area will only realize$32 billion of the $99 billion in transportation '-,= funds needed to maintain current levels of mobility between now and the year 2020. The impact of this shortfall can be seen today, as$750 million of roadway projects in the TxDOT Dallas and Fort Worth f`: Districts are backlogged, ready for construction, but without available funding. Local and Federal Initiatives Communities within the Dallas-Fort Worth area continue to show support for increased transportation funding through the payment of additional local sales taxes, allowing transportation authorities to implement multimodal solutions such as commuter and light rail service, high occupancy vehicle lanes, and expanded bus service. Strong support for toll roads also continues as the North Texas Tollway Authority moves forward with multiple toll road projects. Cities and counties continue to pursue local k° bond programs to build regional transportation projects. The long-awaited additional federal funding has now arrived. With the passage of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), higher levels of needed federal transportation funding will be available for Texas. By adjusting the distribution formulas, Congress has ensured that a greater share of federal transportation funds, estimated to be an additional $700 million annually,will be returned to the State. While these funds will greatly benefit Texas, this initiative alone will not meet the transportation needs. State funds will be required to match the increased federal dollars. We cannot afford to leave T- - federal funds on the table, nor can we afford to divert State funds away from the 100 percent State 40 funded programs. These State funds provide the flexibility needed to carry out.critical State transportation programs. system maintenance, and construction. n North Central Texas Council of Governments Regional Transportation Council - - P.O.Box 5888•Arlington,Texas 76005-5888•(817)640-3300•FAX(817)640-3028•http://www.ncteog.dst.tx.us/trans 5F-4 • F In order to meet the growing need to maintain and expand our z ' transportation system, critical to both the State of Texas and the Dallas- _ ' Fort Worth Metropolitan Area, the 76th Texas Legislature is hereby urged to increase the State level of investment in transportation through the ,= following strategies: 11 :. Stop the Diversion of State Transportation Funds for Non-transportation Purposes „.- V. The State Highway Fund 006 is a significant source of revenue for the State of Texas. Continued erosion of this fund for non-transportation purposes is contributing to the shortfall of transportation funds. 4i' In 1998, the Department of Public Safety (DPS) funding from Fund 006 totaled $318 million or 85 percent E kt of the DPS budget. The Legislature is urged to identify an alternative source of funding for the Department of Public Safety in 1999. Change the State Motor Fuel Tax Point of Collection 4.1 Moving the point of collection of our State motor fuel taxes from retail to the wholesale level in the . distributionprocess has been estimated togenerate an additional 850 million to$100 million in revenue `'`'. P. to Fund 006. Following the lead of the federal government in 1993, and now 18 other U.S. states, the ?. legislature is urged to pursue this action as a mechanism for increasing State transportation revenues. Increase Oversize and Overweight Trucks Fees ;4< • The State 2060 permit fee of$75 allows oversize and overweight trucks to operate on Texas :: roads and bridges that are already overburdened. With 78 percent of the roads and bridges in Texas in ; need of repair or modernization, we must ensure that policies are in place to protect the system, and that sufficient funds are available to adequately maintain road and bridges. The Legislature is urged to revisit <, the 2060 permit fee and restrict oversize/overweight trucks from using functionally and structurally deficient roads and bridges, which creates safetyhazards and causes significant damage to the system. ' 9 9E Further the Legislature is urged to increase the 2060 permit fee to ensure that the oversize and overweight vehicle fee is sufficient to cover the higher costs of repairing damages associated with x;_ these vehicles using the system. wt. i Consider Additional Revenue from Current Sources n~: State revenue for transportation improvements comes largely from State motor fuel taxes and vehicle registration fees. The Regional Transportation Council and NCTCOG support increasing F= revenues from these sources. Specific actions may include: F • increasing State motor fuel taxes; a. • increasing the annual motor vehicle registration fee; °Ei,. • increasing the first-time registration fee for out-of-state vehicles; and : • consider modifying the motor fuel tax structure to a percentage of fuel price - -.- - -- (with a minimum floor) rather than a fixed amount per gallon, in order to maintain the long-term buying power of the State motor fuel tax. • i.: 5F-5 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM SNovember 25 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM:. Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into an interlocal agreement for ambulance service between Denton County and the City of Southlake. Attached is the annual Interlocal Agreement for ambulance service between Denton County and the City of Southlake. The agreement provides a termination agreement of 60 days written notice from either party,provides definitions, states that the City will provide this service when called, and that Denton County will pay a start up fee of$1,307.03 and that there may be other collectible fees when runs are made. The agreement also provides that the City and County agree to accept responsibility for their own acts,negligence or omissions of the officers, employees and agents, and that neither the City or County weigh any immunities or defense that would otherwise be available to each against claims arising from the exercise of government powers and functions. S The effective date will be October 1, 1998 and will extend through September 30, 1999. We annually enter into this agreement with Denton County and previously this agreement has not placed any burden upon our abilities to provide service to our citizens. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement and we request that this be placed on the Consent Agenda at the December 1, 1998 City Council Meeting. C/bls Attachment • 5G-1 4*1 i7s"Y% v 1 BRUCE ISAACKS CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY Carmen Rivera-Worley, Assistant District Attorney (940) 565-8660 Robert Schell, Assistant District Attorney (800) 346-3189 Civil Division Metro (972) 320-4802 1450 East McKinney Fax (940) 565-8592 Denton, Texas 76201 October 21, 1998 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Interlocal Cooperation Agreement- Ambulance Enclosed are two originals of your City's Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for Ambulance Services with Denton County for the 1998-99 fiscal year. Please obtain the appropriate signature on the enclosed agreements and then return both originals to our office within 60 days so that they may be placed. on the next Commissioners Court Agenda. After execution by the Commissioners Court, an original will be returned to your office. Thank you for your assistance in this matter and if you have any questions, please feel free to call me. • Sincerely, A\3 e X 7-S1 Lori Bowers, Paralegal /lb Ends. • 5G-2 . . . . _ • . . ... . . . . 1Prr STHE STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT AMBULANCE SERVICE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1998, by and between DENTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "County" and the "CITY OF SOUTHLAKE", a municipality located in Denton and Tarrant County,Texas,hereinafter referred to as "City." WHEREAS,County is a duly organized political subdivision of the State of Texas engaged in the administration of county government and related services for the benefit of the citizens ; and WHEREAS, City is a municipality engaged in the provision of ambulance service and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton County; and • WHEREAS, City is an owner and operator of certain ambulance vehicles and other equipment designed for the transportation of persons who are sick,infirm, or injured and has in its employ such trained personnel whose duties are related to the use of such vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS, County desires to obtain emergency medical services rendered by City, as more fully hereinafter described for the benefit of the residents of Denton County,Texas; and WHEREAS, the provision of emergency medical services is a governmental function that serves the public health and welfare and is of mutual concern to the contracting parties; and WHEREAS,County and City mutually desire to be subject to the provisions of V.T.C.A. Government Code, Chapter 791, the Interlocal Cooperative Act, V.T.C.A. Health and Safety Code, Section 774.003 and other applicable statutes and contracts pursuant thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, County and City for the mutual consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows: 411 I. The effective date of this agreement shall be the 1st day of October, 1998. INTRRLOCAL AMBULANCE AGREEMENT 1998-99 1 DENTONY COUNTY - CITY OF SOUTHLAXE 5G-3 III II. The term of this agreement shall be for the period of October 1, 1998 to and through September 30, 1999. Each party may terminate this agreement by giving the other party written notice of intent to terminate sixty (60)days after receipt of such notice. III. As used herein, the words and phrases hereinafter set forth shall have the meanings as follows: A. "Emergency" shall mean any circumstance that calls for immediate action and in which the element of time in transporting the sick,wounded or injured for medical treatment is essential to the health or life of a person or persons. Whether the aforementioned circumstances in fact exist is solely up to the discretion of the City. For dispatch purposes only, "emergency" shall include, but not be limited to: 1. The representation by a person requesting ambulance service that an immediate need • purpose of transporting aperson from anylocation to a place of exists for such service for the p rp p g treatment and emergency medical treatment is thereafter administered; and 2. The representation by a person requesting ambulance service that an immediate need exists for such service for the purpose of transporting a person from any location to the closest medical facility; B. "Rural area" means any area within the boundaries of Denton County, Texas, and without the corporate limits of all incorporated cities,towns and villages within said County. C. "Urban area" means any area within said County, within the corporate limits of an incorporated city, town or village. D. "Emergency ambulance call" means a response to a request for ambulance service by the personnel of City in a situation involving an emergency (as such word is hereinabove defined) through the instrumentality of an ambulance vehicle. Within the meaning hereof, a single call 0 might involve the transportation of more than one person at a time. INTKRLOCAL AMBULANCE ?GREAT 1998-99 • 2 DENTONY COUNTY - CITY OF SOUTBLAAB 5G-4 Prril) IV. A. Services to be rendered hereunder by City are ambulance services normally rendered by City under circumstances of emergency as hereinabove defined to citizens of County. B. THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, Fire Services shall respond to the requests for ambulance services made within its designated area of the County, as set out in exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference. C. It is recognized that the officers and employees of City have duties and responsibilities which include the rendering of ambulance services and it shall be the responsibility and within the sole discretion of the officers and employees of City to determine priorities in the dispatching and use of such equipment and personnel and the judgment of any such officer or employee as to any such matter shall be the final determination. V. III The County shall designate the County Judge to act on behalf of County and to serve as n Officer" between County and City. The County Judge or his designated substitute shall insure the performance of all duties and obligations of County herein stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of County in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and provide supervision of County's employees, agents, contractors, sub—contractors and/or laborers,if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of County and City. VI. City shall ensure the performance of all duties and obligations of City as hereinafter stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of City in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and shall provide immediate and direct supervision of the City employees, agents, contractors,sub—contractors and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of fl) City and County. INTERLOCAL AMBULANCE AGREEMENT 199E-99 3 DENTONY COUNTY - CITY OF SOUTBLM B 5G-5 • VII. For the services hereinabove stated, County agrees to pay to Provider a fee of $1,307.03 based on a funding formula as follows: First, the readiness sum is .664 per capita based on population, for a maximum of $292.96. Second, a sum of $444.00 per ambulance run, for a maximum of$0.00. This sum is based upon the number of runs made by Provider in fiscal year 1998. Third, a fixed sum based on size of covered rural area, for a maximum of $0.00. The first and third sums are based upon population and mileage figures obtained from the North Central Texas Council of Governments. The second sum is based upon the definition of an ambulance call for purposes of this agreement. An ambulance call is defined as treatment and transport of a patient to a medical facility. Payment shall not be allowed for instances in which a patient is not transported. Consistent with the reporting procedures described below, the Provider transporting the patient shall receive payment, regardless of the service delivery area in which the call • originated. payment Requests for aYm ent shall be submitted on the standardized ambulance transportation reporting form approved and provided by the County, accompanied by copies of patient admission/registration forms as provided by a hospital or medical facility. It shall be the responsibility of the Provider to fully complete the forms and to provide complete and accurate patient information. Requests for payment shall be submitted timely; that is, within five (5) days of the performance of service by the Provider. Requests not timely submitted shall not be considered for payment. Requests for payment may be submitted by personal delivery,U.S. mail, facsimile, or computer telephone link to the office of the Denton County Fire Marshal. The date of submission shall be the date the fully documented request is received in said office. VIII. County agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts,negligence and/or omissions of all County's officers, employees and agents. S INTBRLOCAL AMBULANCE AGREEMENT 1998-99 4 DENTONY COUNTY - CITY OF SOUTELAKE 5G-6 • IX. City agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts,negligence and/or omissions of all City's officers, employees and agents. . X. In the event of any default in any of the covenants herein contained, this agreement may be forfeited and terminated at either parry's discretion if such default continues for a period of ten (10) days after notice to the other party in writing of such default and intention to declare this agreement terminated. Unless the default is cured as aforesaid, this agreement shall terminate as if that were the day originally fixed herein for the expiration of the agreement. XI. This agreement may be terminated at any lime by either party giving sixty (60) days advance notice to the other party. In the event of such termination by either party, City shall be compensated pro rata for all services performed to termination date, together with reimbursable • expenses then due and as authorized b Y this agreement.reement. In the event of such termination, should p City be overcompensated on a pro rate basis for all services performed to termination date and/or be overcompensated reimbursable expenses as authorized by this agreement, then County shall be reimbursed pro rata for all such overcompensation. Acceptance of such reimbursement shall not constitute a waiver of any claim that may otherwise arise out of this agreement. XII. . The fact that County and City accept certain responsibilities relating to the rendering of ambulance services under this agreement as a part of their responsibility for providing protection for the public health makes it imperative that the performance of these vital services be recognized as a governmental function and that the doctrine of governmental immunity shall be, and it is hereby, invoked to the extent possible under the law. Neither City nor County waives nor shall be deemed hereby to waive any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against • claims arising from the exercise of governmental powers and functions. s INTERLOCAL AMBULANCE AOREENffiNT 1998-99 DENTONY COUNTY - CITY OF $OUTEELAKE 5G-7 • XIII. This agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and County and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements, either written or oral. This . agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties. XIV. This agreement and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. XV. In the event that any portion of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. XVI. • The undersigned officer and/or agents of the parties hereto are the properly authorized necessaryauthorityto execute this agreement on behalf of the parties hereto officials and have the g and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extended said authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. • 411 INTERLOCAL AMBULANCE AGREEMENT 1998-99 6 DENTONY COUNTY - CITY OP SOUTHLA10E 5G-8 11111 EXECUTED in duplicate originals,this the day of , 1998. COUNTY CITY DENTON COUNTY,TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 110 WEST HICKORY 667 NORTH CARROLL DENTON,TEXAS 76201 SOUTHLAKE,TX 76092 By By Jeff Moseley City Manager Denton County Judge Acting on behalf of and by Acting on behalf of and by the authority of DENTON COUNTY the authority of the City of Commissioners Court of SOUTHLAKE,Texas Denton County,Texas. ATTEST: ATTEST: BY: BY: Tim Hodges City Secretary Denton County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: • /QS Assistant District Attorney Deputy Director,Fire Services APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Denton County Fire Marshal • INTEBLOCAL AMBULANCE AST 1998-99 DENTONY COUNTY - CITY OF BOUTBLMZ 5G-9 • • ____--____— p i t r i c t s Count Y Ambul3nce Denton • -4,4- VY"..-Ijj.:1.15-Jel_LI--- . f i.•' ' .,. \ • ' 4 Z w4 rr t. �� ,t , • fl it,...4____t tn i _I) . • •fl.1.:,;::.::::::::."...::‘,,... .:1-71,kI•?"—r-137.. .:7*** . " ' :,••1.,..:;;.i...."51.,..::.?\..;:!:.".i:!•,:t.:1::,•.1::It:(1.-.;:......."..,.... '. ,./a•-'7.. ..../'.71C,•41.,--:t.,.„1.:. .*.i c. 4011:111. if ' ' •t--.1;i:....f.1,MC.`.:..i'....-..-i-?•'1 4.N ' .1.i; c''' F--;r4 .... itir . ar )4 '-• 1 • fit•• .�! 1.ff ,h fT jeir ...4 t. .?'• _sr,.L '' �r Y fir:�,(�: • ',, :.• _ .. ., 1 t4 air". • • Sir ' t1i- ' IQ 11. ;.11 • t 4. • • • 40 • _: ,,..,.. . .. 4 ..:••••!•%, ..t. ,,i,i,... .: ,. . • r.rt- r.t .glittrill. n tl fl Cftrttr.trit W 1 • f f,t r3frtt. clot" tree1 J-- Illiik i 110 1 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM rNovember 25, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into an interlocal agreement for fire protection services between Denton County and the City of Southlake. Attached is the annual Interlocal Agreement for fire protection service between Denton County and the City of Southlake. The agreement states that Denton County agrees to pay the City of Southlake for the full performance of this agreement,the sum of$5,000 upon execution of this agreement, and$137.50 per fire call in the designated unincorporated areas of Denton County. The agreement provides for Denton County to engage in fire service in our City when we call for their aid, and we will provide fire service in their areas, when needed. It allows for the Denton County Fire Marshal to respond and assist,when needed,with the City providing reciprocal assistance. The agreement also provides that the County of Denton will supply the City of Southlake with an • 800 MHz radio for contact and we will have utilization of that radio during the duration of the agreement. The agreement provides a termination agreement of 60 days written notice from either party, and it provides that the City and County agree to accept responsibility for their own acts, negligence or omissions of the officers, employees and agents, and that neither the City or County weigh any immunities or defense that would otherwise be available to each against claims arising from the exercise of government powers and functions. The effective date will be October 1, 1998 and will extend through September 30, 1999. We annually enter into this agreement with Denton County and previously this agreement has not placed any burden upon our abilities to provide service to our citizens. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement and we request that this be placed on the Consent Agenda at the December 1, 1998 City Council Meeting. .r� BC/bls Attachment 1111 5H-1 7. 7 u ', 'I _... .... • r� iy OCT. 2 3 _ LJ QFCiCE O'ir CITY s I 1 a 1,t t d �a+:lrw,/ 3 w BRUCE ISAACKS io f e J' eiv CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY Carmen Rivera-Worley, Assistant District Attorney (940) 565-8660 Robert Schell, Assistant District Attorney (800) 346-3189 Civil Division Metro (972) 320-4802 P.O. Box 2850 Fax (940) 565-8592 Denton, Texas 76201 October 21, 1998 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Interlocal Cooperation Agreement -Fire S Enclosed please find the fiscal year 1998-99 Interlocal Agreement .for Fire Protection Services between Denton County and the City of Southlake. Please obtain the appropriate signatures on the enclosed agreements and then return both to our office within 60 days so that they may be placed on the Commissioners Court Agenda. An original will be returned to you for your files. Thank you for your assistance in this matter and if you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. • Sincerely, Lori Bowers, Paralegal /lb Ends. S 5H-2 4110 THE STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of, , 1998, by and between DENTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and the "CITY OF SOUTHLAKE" , a municipal corporation located in Denton COUNTY, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "CITY. " WHEREAS, COUNTY is a duly organized political subdivision of the State of Texas engaged in the administration of COUNTY IIIgovernment and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton COUNTY; and WHEREAS, CITY is a municipal corporation, duly organized and operating under the laws of the State of Texas and is engaged in the provision of fire protection service and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton COUNTY; and WHEREAS, CITY is the owner and operator of certain fire protection vehicles and other equipment designed for the extinguishing of fire and prevention of damage to property and injury to persons from fire and has in its employ trained personnel whose duties are related to the use of such vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY mutually desire to be subject to • theprovisions of V.T.C.A. Government Code, Chapter 791, the p SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 1 5H-3 111/!" 1111 Interlocal Cooperative Act and Sections 352. 001 and 352 . 004 Local Government Code and contract pursuant thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, COUNTY AND CITY, for the mutual consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows: I. The effective date of this agreement shall be the 1st day of October, 1998 . The term of this agreement shall be for the period of October 1, 1998 to and through September 30, 1999 . II. Services to be rendered hereunder by CITY are fire protection services normally rendered within the CITY Fire Department as hereinafter defined, to citizens of COUNTY, to wit: 1110 A. Availability and provision of emergency fire prevention, extinguishment, safety and rescue services within the agreed or specified territory or jurisdiction of the CITY Fire Department; said services to be rendered as described herein by said Department in all unincorporated areas within the above referenced operating territory or jurisdiction of such Department, the referenced services as set out herein are rendered by said Department in consideration of the basic funding referenced elsewhere herein and the per-call fee set out elsewhere herein, for the common good and benefit and to serve the public convenience and necessity of the citizens of Denton COUNTY who are not otherwise protected with respect to fire prevention, 1110 extinguishment, safety, and rescue services. B. The CITY OF SOIITHLAKE Fire Services Division shall respond to requests for fire protection services made within SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 2 SH-4 ry III COUNTY as set out in Exhibit "A" attached hereto designated area 11 and incorporated by reference. C. The COUNTY agrees that in the event a fire in the CITY' s unincorporated designated area which the CITY considers to be of incendiary nature and upon request by the CITY, the COUNTY Fire Marshal will dispatch investigation personnel to the fire scene within a response time sufficient to legally maintain and protect all evidence of said fire and will conduct all appropriate investigation and prosecution of arsonists. D. It is further agreed that the CITY shall not be responsible for investigations of suspected incendiary fires in rural area, but shall cooperate with the COUNTY Fire Marshal in 1111 immediately relating all pertinent information possible to the investigator(s) . • E. It is further agreed that the COUNTY Fire Marshal may assist in the conduct of appropriate investigations of a fire which the CITY considers to be of incendiary nature in the CITY' s incorporated designated area upon request by the CITY. . F. It is further agreed that the CITY shall submit monthly statements on the Texas Fire Incident Reporting System' s standardized forms to the Denton COUNTY Fire Marshal, 110 West Hickory, Denton, Texas 76201. This form will serve as the billing statement to the COUNTY for reimbursement of calls made in the unincorporated designated area. • G. It is further agreed that Denton COUNTY Fire Marshal shall provide the forms upon request from the CITY SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 5H-5 3 111/!" S H. It is recognized that the officers and employees of. CITY' s Fire Department have duties and responsibilities which include the rendition of fire protection services, and it shall be the responsibility and within the sole discretion of the officers and employees of said Fire Department to determine priorities in the dispatching and use of such equipment and personnel, and the • judgment of any such officer or employee as to any such matter shall be the final determination. III. The COUNTY shall designate the COUNTY Judge to act on behalf of COUNTY and to serve as "Liaison Officer" between COUNTY and CITY. The COUNTY Judge or his designated substitute shall insure 1111 the performance of all duties and obligations of COUNTY herein stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of COUNTY in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and provide supervision of COUNTY' S employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of COUNTY and CITY. IV. CITY shall ensure the performance of all duties and obligations of CITY as hereinafter stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of CITY in 4111 full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and shall provide immediate and direct supervision of the CITY employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors and/or laborers, SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 • 4 5H-6 1..r _ _ 1111 if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of CITY and COUNTY. V. For the services hereinabove stated, COUNTY agrees to pay to CITY for the full performance of this agreement the sum of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5, 000. 00) upon execution of this agreement and the sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN AND 50/100 DOLLARS ($137 .50) per fire call in the designated unincorporated areas of Denton COUNTY, Texas. No payment will be made for service provided outside the service district whether by mutual aid agreement or otherwise. CITY understands and agrees that payment by COUNTY to the CITY shall be made in accordance with the normal and customary 1111 processes and business procedures of COUNTY, and in conformance with applicable state law. COUNTY agrees to provide to CITY an STX 800 Mhz radio for the use of CITY in carrying out the terms of this contract. This radio will remain the property of the COUNTY and will be returned on termination of this agreement. COUNTY will bear the risk of loss or destruction and make necessary repairs so long as CITY uses the property in a reasonable manner for the purposes of this contact. COUNTY reserves the right to reclaim the property at any time for any reason. It is agreed by COUNTY and CITY that the radio was provided for in previous contracts between COUNTY and CITY. No agreement has been made for an additional radio. SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 5 ST-T-7 Illir S VI. COUNTY agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, negligence, and/or omissions of all COUNTY' S officers, employees, and agents while with in its COUNTY limits. VII. COUNTY and CITY understand and agree that liability under this contract is governed by V.T.C.A. Government Code Chapter 791 and V.T.C.A. Local Government Code Section 352. 001 and 352 . 004. This agreement is made in contemplation of the applicability of these laws to the agreement. Insofar as legally possible COUNTY and CITY agree to be bound by the above mentioned statutes as they exist as of the date of this agreement. S VIII. In the event of any default in any of the covenants herein contained, this agreement may be forfeited and terminated at either party' s discretion if such default continues for a period of ten (10) days after notice to the other party in writing of such default and intention to declare this agreement terminated. Unless the default is cured as aforesaid, this agreement shall terminate as if that were the day originally fixed herein for the expiration of the agreement. IX. This agreement may be terminated any time, by either party giving sixty (60) days advance written notice to the other party. 1110 In the event of such termination by either party, CITY shall be compensated pro rata for all services performed to termination date, together with reimbursable expenses then due and as SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 6 SH-R S authorized by this agreement. In the event of such termination, should CITY be overcompensated on a pro rata basis for all services performed to termination date, and/or be overcompensated reimbursable expenses as authorized by this Agreement, then COUNTY shall be reimbursed pro rata for all such overcompensation. Acceptance of such reimbursement shall not constitute a waiver of any claim that may otherwise arise out of this agreement. X. The fact that COUNTY and CITY accept certain responsibilities relating to the rendition of fire protection services under this agreement as a part of their responsibility for providing protection for the public health makes it imperative • that the performance of these vital services be recognized as a governmental function and that the doctrine of governmental immunity shall be and it is hereby invoked to the extent possible under the law. Neither CITY nor COUNTY waives nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising from the exercise of government powers and functions. XI. This agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between CITY and COUNTY and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements, either written or oral. This agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both 4110 CITY and COUNTY. SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 7 S XII. This agreement and any of its terms and provision, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. • XIII. In the event that any portion of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. XIV. The undersigned officer and/or agents of the parties hereto are the property authorized officials and have the necessary 1111 authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. XV. Acceptance of this contract constitutes approval of the service area set out in.exhibit "A" attached hereto. S SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 ' 5H-10 8 SEXECUTED in duplicate originals, this the day of , 1998 . COUNTY CITY DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 110 WEST HICKORY 667 NORTH CARROLL BLVD. DENTON, TEXAS 76201 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 By By Jeff Moseley Title Denton COUNTY Judge Acting on behalf of and by Acting on behalf of and by the the authority of DENTON COUNTY authority of the THE CITY OF Commissioners Court of SOUTHLAKE Denton COUNTY, Texas. ATTEST: ATTEST: BY: BY: S Tim Hodges Secretary Denton COUNTY Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ArLii Assistant District Attorney Deputy Director, Fire Services APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Denton COUNTY Fire Marshal S SOUTHLAKE FIRE CONTRACT 1998-99 9 5H=11 • • . k T 1 " 5 C nay � � Ce D + co klil.fiA;ct.tAit .4..r......' : .. 11*-rt-;.;.;„ -..0.--. . .... .0. • VIA4,:;\t.rNiti..) V P. p • ,• ram'• S „.,4 . ei • • b • 24 • 24 ta .1:,4'.1.te:' ",t7 = p"C1 tif*. • ' •t:'i. %.:-:tl' t:��1 : h.• •c +' "•S � 4(t.: it:.1;...t, •t.`lS_1% • yn • t ire . I ; • t ' =. . . �, mo -+t:. ;,, r.+; : t;.. ..•; y ; ( WO r ...li:% • . .1 . ,.- -• ••%.‘ .• .z .*•,... *-* r`12:41 ' t' e..- 000%) .1111 t V . :•s ,.is...., .•t •� � Y `5... ; t L • tt! C'°�I yr 1 ` L : =• :. • ''' 1' f: : , y it : •: tilt•;, p ,.. .{ ;1::...! ;•41.';'1. :1•..1: •.1....: . : . .. el . • er . .,s. -.... . . ,..,..z, • • ifs e s -" �' s� L� • � •r:f*:.•'.. •1 ct•,,*nt 110 • ..,... �Q tt1+1 It tea'.'"_ �lsl� t ta.. • .o 0 • . . "L •. ��11�1 1-t�'� 1tt1t 1: t.� t t ol,.. r tt City of Southlake,Texas • 11 MEMORANDUM November 24, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Approval of Change Order #1 to Thomas Brothers Grass for preparation of soil prior to laying sod at Bob Jones Park. You will recall that in June 1998, SPDC awarded a bid to Thomas Brothers Grass at a cost of $53,762.40. Due to a number of factors. (Texas Parks and Wildlife grant, irrigation, dry summer) we did not lay the sod immediately. We have continued to delay the sodding because of the grant contract, but now feel we must install the grass prior to the weather turning cold to still have it available in time for the spring soccer season. Because of the dilemma we are in, Texas Parks and Wildlife has verbally agreed with us and said they will consider the cost in the grant reimbursement, even though we do not yet have a signed contract with them Because of the delay, the soil conditions at Bob Jones Park now necessitate soil preparation in 4110 order for us to have the best possible chance to allow the grass to root before it becomes dormant for the winter. It is for this reason that we are bringing forth Change Order #1 to the contract with Thomas Brothers Grass. In order to keep the costs as low as possible, we reduced the soccer field perimeter area to be sodded (the perimeter outside of the actual game field playing area). The resultant change order amounts to a net increase of$5,603.80. The cost of this change order can be absorbed by the SPDC reserves for FY 1998-99, or from cost savings on other projects within Bob Jones Park. Staff requests you place this item on the regular agenda for City Council consideration at their December 1 meeting. SPDC moved this item to their consent agenda and approved it unanimously at their November 23 meeting. Please contact me or Park Planning and Construction Superintendent Ben Henry if you have any further questions. Vil -- KH Attachment: Change Order #1 to Thomas Brothers Grass for sodding of soccer fields CHANGE ORDER No. 1 • Dated: November 9, 1998 Project Bob Jones Park-Phase I Soccer Field Improvements OWNER City of Southlake Contract For Sodding of Soccer Fields Contract Date July 9, 1998 To: Thomas Bros. Grass Contractor You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject Contract: City of Southlake Owner By Dated , 1998 • Nature of Changes: Remove Following Items From Contract: Quantity Unit Price Total 1) Certified Bermuda 419 Sod as specified. 1,652.12 s.y. 1.90 s.y. $3,139.03 Total Deleted = $3,139.03 Additional Work to be Constructed: Quantity Unit Price Total 1) Prepare sod base on (3) 10u fields. 116,707 s f. 0.035 s f. $4,084.75 (247 ft. x 157.5 ft.) 2) Prepare sod base on (8) 8u fields. 123,088 sf. 0.035 sf. $4,308.08 (157 ft. x 98 ft.) 3) Install common Bermuda sod within 514 lf. 200 s.y. 1.75 s.y. $350.00 drainage swale. Total Added = $8,742.83 Total Amount Change Order=$ 5,603.80 Page 1 of 2 • ' These Changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Contract Time: Contract Price Prior to This Change Order $ 53,762.40 Net Resulting from This Change Order $ 5,603.80 (10.4%) Current Contract Price Including This Change Order $ 59,366.20 NSPE-ASCE 1910-8-B(1978 Edition) Contract Time Prior to This Change open calendar days Net Resulting from This Change Order 0 Current Contract Time Including This Change Order open calendar days 0 The Above Changes Are Approved: Curtis E. Hawk City Manager By Date , 1998 The Above Changes Are Accepted: Thomas Bros. Grass Contractor By Date , 1998 ,r Page 2 of 2 51- ,9) IWCity of Southlake, Texas ' 0 MEMORANDUM November 24, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-74 The City of Southlake passed Ordinance No. 497 on March 6, 1990, providing for the establishment of a records management program for the City. Ordinance No. 497 names the City Secretary as the Records Manager for the City of Southlake. The Local Government Records Act of 1989 (Chapter 203 of the Local Government Code) was amended to permit local governments to file a written Declaration that records control schedules that have been adopted and comply with the minimum requirements for records retention schedules issued by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission, in lieu of the City developing local schedules for records retention. This amendment to the Act permits local governments that have not yet developed and filed schedules with the Texas State Library to adopt schedules issued by the Commission for use in their records management programs. ' S The old deadline for filing records control schedules was January 2, 1995. The deadline was amended and a new deadline for either filing records control schedules or filing'the written declaration of adoption of records control schedules, is January 4, 1999. No provision was made by the Legislature for extensions of the new deadline. Providing a solid foundati I n for a local governments' records management program is the foremost purpose of the records control schedule. Some of the benefits of the records management program are: • Complying with legal requirements. • Destroying records that no longer have value to the government. • Providing legal protection to the government when destroying records. • Retaining records of permanent value. • Improving protection of vital records. ■ Providing security for records with confidential or sensitive information. ■ Efficiently using office space for active records. • Moving inactive records into less expensive storage areas, if possible. • Releasing equipment and reusable media for other productive uses. • Maintaining records in the formats offering optimum cost-effectiveness. • I have provided a copy of the records retention schedules that pertain to each department • to the Director of that department. The State records retention schedules allow for only • the minimum retention schedule. At a later date, if the Director chooses to extend the retention period for a particular record, that will be handled by resolution. The Records Manager will keep an accurate record of the extended retention periods that go beyond the State recommendation. A copy of the records control schedules are on file in my office and available for inspection by Councilmembers, staff, or the general public. I recommend that Resolution No. 98-74 be approved, allowing me to sign and file the Declaration of Compliance with the Records Scheduling Requirement of the Local Government Records Act. A copy of the document to be filed is hereby attached to the memorandum for your information. If you have questions, please let me know. _ifll..4I Si / 1111 M:\WP-FILES\Records-memo.doc • 111 Instructions for Completing Form SLR 508 • Declaration of Compliance with the Records Scheduling Requirement of the Local Government Records Act Completion of this form is largely self-explanatory, but records management officers should keep the following in mind when preparing the form for submission. • Before submitting this declaration,make certain that you have the latest editions of the records retention schedules issued by the commission(see enclosed list)that are applicable to the records of your government. If you do not:have the latest editions,contact the State and Local Records Management Division. • Elective county officers should indicate both their county and office(and precinct number, if applicable)under the name of the government. For example,Travis County Commissioner#3. • Declarations must be signed by the designated records management officer of the local government or elective county office. Declarations not signed by the records management officer will be returned for re-submission. • Do not declare the adoption of records control schedules that comply with schedules issued by the commission that are inapplicable to the records of your government. For example, a school district should not check Local Schedule CC,which is used exclusively by county clerks. Declarations indicating compliance with inappropriate schedules will be returned for re-submission. • If the policy statement (for elective county offices) or ordinance, order, or resolution (for local governments) you previously filed with the commission declares the intent to retain all records of your office or government permanently, you must submit amended documentation with this form. withdrawing that intent, to make this declaration acceptable r filing. 0o A copy of this form indicating its acceptance for filing will be returned to the records management officer. SFor questions concerning the use of this form or the management of local government records, please call our government records consultant for your region or (512) 452-9242. City of Southlake,Texas OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS CITY RESOLUTION NO. 98-74 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TEXAS STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES COMMISSION RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES; AUTHORIZING THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER TO SIGN THE DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE; AND DIRECTING THE RECORDS MANAGER TO FILE THE DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TEXAS STATE LIBRARY. WHEREAS, the Local Government Records Act of 1989, Chapter 203 of the Local Government Code, was amended, to permit local governments to file a written Declaration that records control schedules have been adopted that comply with the minimum requirements on records retention schedules issued by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission in lieu of developing local schedules for records retention; and, WHEREAS, Section 203.041 of the Local Government Code provides that the declaration of compliance be signed by the records management officer and that the declaration of compliance be filed with the director and librarian of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission; and, 0 WHEREAS, the City of Southlake passed Ordinance No. 497 on March 6, 1990 providing for the establishment of a records management program; and, WHEREAS, the City of Southlake desires to adopt the Texas State Library and Archives Commission schedules and guidelines; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS, THAT: I. The City of Southlake, Texas, hereby adopts the Texas State Library and Archives Commission schedules for records retention. II. The records manager of the City of Southlake shall complete a Declaration of Compliance with the Records Scheduling Requirement of the Local Government Records Act. S III. The records manager of the City of Southlake shall file, via certified mail return receipt requested, the Declaration of Compliance with the director and librarian of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission, State and Local Records Management Division, Post Office Box 12927, Austin, Texas 78711-2927. IV. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Resolution was passed was open to the public and that public notice of the time,place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by law. V. This Resolution shall be effective upon passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1998. • Mayor,Rick Stacy City of Southlake, Texas ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney MIAW P-FIL ES\RESOLUTI\Res-98-74-Record-Reten tion.doc\sl rilP7 City of Southlake, Texas 4,11 MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with Tarrant County for Use of Their Recycling Center for Destruction of Records. As part of the Records Management Program, it will be necessary to provide for the destruction of records once the retention period expires. The records must be either shredded or burned according to the Local Government Code. The Tarrant County Records Destruction and Recycling Program was established in August1993 by the Office of the County Clerk to provide an alternative to traditional waste disposal methods by destroying eligible records and bailing the shredded record material for resale. The Texas National Resource Conservation Commission supports the development and implementation of programs to reduce and recycle waste materials from Spublic entities to reduce waste by 50%by the year 2000. The Tarrant County Records Destruction and Recycling Program has been expanded from a program solely for the County Clerk's records to now include the destruction of records and paper materials from a variety of County offices and facilities, as well as other local governmental agencies. The governing bodies of each party find that the project of undertaking is necessary for the benefit of the public and that each party has the legal authority to provide such service, and the reduction of waste is in the common interest of both parties. The agreement provides the following: ✓ County and the County Clerk will shred all documents sent for destruction in accordance with State Laws. ✓ County and the County Clerk agree to shred those documents specifically identified to be of a confidential nature without pre-sorting. ✓ County and the County Clerk will give to the City a Destruction Certification after the destruction of said documents. ✓ All shredded paper becomes the property of County and is the consideration for County's participation in this project. ✓ The City agrees to deliver to the recycling center located at 600 South Sylvania, Fort Worth, Texas, all paper records for destruction. • ✓ The City agrees to deliver only office type paper clean of any trash capable of recycling. PP% • ✓ The City agrees to call the County for an appointment before the delivery of paper. ✓ All paper sent for destruction will be the responsibility of the City to ensure that all State Laws and rules of the State Library have been met. ✓ The City agrees to fill out a Destruction Request each time records are brought to the recycling center. ✓ County and the County Clerk will not be liable for destruction of paper which may not be destroyed pursuant to State Law. The agreement has not arrived from the County as of this time. I will send it to you when I get it. I recommend the City enter into this agreement with Tarrant County. Please place this item on the City Council agenda for December 1, 1998. If you have questions please let me know. sl 5v_ • City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for aerial photography services in • order to develop topographic information for the Drainage Master Plan Background Recently, the City of Southlake obtained the professional services of Freese &Nichols to develop a Master Drainage Plan. The Master Drainage Plan will be developed in two phases. Phase I of the Master Drainage Plan was developed to assist the City in evaluating the existing conditions of the city wide drainage infrastructure. Also included in Phase I was the assessment of the City's existing mapping and geographic information • system. The existing topographic maps do not have the accuracy desirable to perform the second phase of. the Drainage Master Plan (design of the Master Drainage Plan). Therefore, in order to complete the second phase of the Drainage Master Plan as well as enhance the quality and accuracy of future studies of infrastructure design, a detailed topographic map of the City is warranted. Funding Impact Aerial photographs must be completed during the winter months when foliage is at a minimum. The city is anticipating having the photography completed in February. In order to keep this schedule, a contract must be executed by the end of December. As you know, the city is in the process of developing a Stormwater Drainage Utility District (SDUD). The cost to develop the detailed topographic maps will be funded through the SDUD. The estimated cost to develop the detailed topographic maps is $150,000. 5L-1 • Recommendation Staff recommends Council authorization to advertise for bids for aerial photography services in order to develop topographic information for the Drainage Master Please place this item on the December 1, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. BW/sep 111 -5L=2 !Pr: City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM • November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Stefanie E. Sarakaitis, Planner SUBJECT: Second Reading of SIGN ORDINANCE No. 704-A The attached draft 3 of Sign Ordinance No. 704-A reflects the recommendations discussed by City Council at its October 13, 1998 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission's recommendations, as well as a few "clean-up"items. The proposed phase-out for subdivision marketing signs is indicated in I m. format. • Each of the recommended changes is listed in the table below. gagexw:� $ect®ng014 ?ra���p�'���3Mb 1Re0,00000)3101V122WainiVSM_' .z`:' ir 9 16.C.2 Ground signs: location Location limitations regulation stricken, since signs in public right-of-way limitation/minimum addressed in§ 17(prohibited signs); minimum setback to be fifteen(15)feet setback from any property line 11-12 19.D.2 Bulletin board signs Minimum setback shall not be applicable 12 19.G.2 Gasoline pricing signs Minimum letter height shall not apply for the fuel classification (i.e. "Unleaded", "Diesel", etc.) or the price-per-gallon display; illumination revised to provide for internal illumination for fuel classification and price- per-gallon panels only. 03 21.B.2 Model home signs Minimum setback and locations where allowed stricken since ground sign regulations modified; residential adjacency stricken since this only applies to attached signs 13 21.C.2 Special purpose signs Maximum height for ground signs increased to nine (9) feet; maximum area increased to sixty-four (64) s.f., not exceeding thirty-two (32) s.f. per face; maximum number reduced to three (3), to include two (2) off-site and one (1)on-site;locations where allowed stricken 13-14 21.D.2 Development signs Residential adjacency stricken;locations where allowed stricken 14 22.A.2 Subdivision marketing Minimum setback shall not be applicable (For the proposed phase-out plan, signs the regulations for the previous sign ordinance(506-B)will apply for houses permitted on or before 12/01/98: previous definition; a maximum of three (3) signs advertising the same item per grouping of signs; no signs closer than fifty feet (50') from an intersecting ROW, signs advertising the same item may be no closer than ten feet(10')apart. The phase-out shall occur in reduction increments of 25% of the total (approximately 500 signs) every three months to terminate on 12/01/99. 14 22.B.2 Builder signs Minimum setback shall not be applicable 14 22.C.2 Real estate signs Maximum area revised to provide for sixty-four (64) s.f., not exceeding thirty-two (32) s.f per face; minimum setback shall not apply for ground signs four(4)s.f.or less per face in area 14 22.D Window signs Language added for the area of the sign to be measured by the smallest box that could be drawn around the continuity of the sign 14-15 22.E.2 Garage sale signs Maximum number of signs increased to four (4) per sale, only.one (1) off- site sign along any (not each) numbered highway (1938, 1709, 114), all 4111/ signs must display address of sale;minimum setback shall not be applicable; placement time revised to noon Thursday to noon Monday; frequency limitation section added 16-22 Appendices Various exhibits Appendix 'A': maximum allowed sign area provisions added for exhibits; Appendix B': clarification graphic added for window signs L\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFIlSIGN\704-A\CCMEMO2.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Page 1 City of Southlake Texas • t the November 17, 1998 City Council meeting, the Council asked staff to contact several parties directly terested in the changes proposed in this ordinance. Special Purpose Signs: • Bev Bergeland, GRACE: favors an increase in number of signs (10-20) with a decrease in number of days (14) and is content with current size(4 s.f.per sign face) • John Pickier, Identitec: favors an increase in number of signs in conjunction with decreased size (i.e., 2 signs at 32 s.f.per sign face(one of these being on-site) and up to 6 off-site signs at 4 s.f.per sign face) Garage Sale Signs: • Bill Spivey: in agreement with proposed revisions Subdivision Marketing Signs: • Kosse Maykus, Greater Tarrant County Builders Association: in agreement with the proposed phased removal of subdivision marketing signs Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at 481-5581, ext. 753. SES enc. Draft#3, Sign Ordinance No. 704-A • S L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFrSIGN\704A\CCMEM02.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Page 2 • ORDINANCE NO. 704-A SIGN ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE REGULATION OF SIGNS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS AND PURPOSES FOR THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND REVOCATION OF SIGN PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR THE REMOVAL OF SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR APPEALS AND VARIANCES; PROVIDING FOR LIMITATIONS ON THE LOCATION, SETBACK, HEIGHT, SIZE, LIGHTING AND OTHER REGULATIONS OF SIGNS; PROHIBITING CERTAIN SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPT SIGNS; ALLOWING NONCOMMERCIAL (IDEOLOGICAL) COPY ON SIGNS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Cityof Southlake Texas is a home rule cityactingunder its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake finds that the uncontrolled proliferation of signs is hazardous to users of streets and highways within the City of Southlake and will adversely affect the safety and efficiency of the City's transportation network; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that scenic resources are distributed throughout the City and have contributed greatly to its economic development by attracting tourists,permanent residents, and new businesses and cultural facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that unless the location, number, setback lighting and size of signs are regulated, the scattering of such signs throughout the City would be detrimental to the preservation of those scenic resources and so to the economic base of the City; • and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that the proliferation of signs in the City has an adverse affect on adjacent properties; and L:\CIPYDOCSIORDIDRAFr\SIGN1704-A\DRAFT-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page i � 161r3 WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore developed and adopted a comprehensive plan guiding the orderly and proper growth of the City in order to promote the public health, safety,welfare and aesthetics; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the orderly and uniform regulation of signs is a substantial factor in guiding the attractive and aesthetic development of properties in accordance with the comprehensive plan and thereby avoiding detrimental impacts of signs on the appearance of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council further fords that the regulations adopted herein allow for a reasonable use of signs by businesses, residences and other properties for advertisement, dissemination of protected speech and other purposes; and - WHEREAS,the City Council finds that, in addition to the above findings, the adoption of this ordinance will serve the following purposes: To preserve, protect, and enhance areas of historical, architectural, cultural, aesthetic, and economic value regardless of whether they are natural or manmade; To protect adjacent and nearby properties, in particular, residentially zoned properties from the impact of lighting, size, height, movement, and location of signs; To protect the safety and efficiency of the City's transportation network by reducing the confusion or distraction to motorists and enhancing the motorist's ability to see pedestrians, obstacles, other vehicles, and traffic signs; To enhance the impression of the City which is conveyed to tourists and visitors by controlling the location,number, and size of signs; . To integrate sign regulations more effectively with other regulations by establishing requirements for setbacks, height, and spacing to allow for lighting, ventilation, and preservation of views in a manner consistent with land uses in the 41) various zoning districts; and To preserve and enhance the appearance of the City and the public interest in aesthetics, and to control and reduce visual clutter and blight; and L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFIISIGN1704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page ii prrp- III To provide institutional entities within the City the ability to communicate public events to the general public; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary to adopt this ordinance in order to • protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: SECTION 1. The attached regulations are hereby adopted as the Sign Ordinance of the City of Southlake: SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of • Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are ihereby repealed. Ordinance No. 704 is hereby repealed. SECTION 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence,paragraph or section. SECTION 4. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be • fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted separate offense.to exist shall constitute a LACITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFrs1GN\704-A\DRAFr-3.Doc SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page iii —70- -S 11.V- • SECTION 5. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 704 or any other ordinances affecting the regulation of signs which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 6. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 7. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. S L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFI1S1GN\704-A\DRAFT-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page iv 4- (o PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1998. • MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney 110 L:ICITYDOCSIORD\DRAFI\SIGN\704-A\DRAFC-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page v Pr" SIGN ORDINANCE • TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I-IN GENERAL 1 SEC. 1 DEFINITIONS 1 A. GENERAL 1 ARTICLE II-ADMINISTRATION 4 SEC.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENFORCEMENT 4 SEC.3 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED 4 SEC.4 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT 4 SEC. 5 FEES 4 SEC. 6 CONDITIONAL SIGN PERMIT 4 SEC.7 REVOCATION OF PERMITS 5 SEC. 8 INSPECTION 5 • SEC.9 PERMIT VALID FOR ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY(180)DAYS 5 • SEC. 10 INVESTIGATION FEES: WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT 5 SEC. 11 REMOVAL OF SIGNS 6 A. OBSOLETE SIGNS 6 B. UNSAFE,DILAPIDATED OR DETERIORATED SIGNS. 6 C. SIGNS ON UTILITY POLES 6 D. SIGNS IN RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR ON PUBLIC PROPERTY 6 E. ILLEGALLY ERECTED SIGNS 6 F. EXTENT OF SIGN REMOVAL 7 SEC. 12 FILING OF LIENS AGAINST PROPERTY 7 ARTICLE III-APPEALS AND VARIANCES 7 SEC. 13 APPEALS 7 SEC. 14 VARIANCES 7 ARTICLE IV-GENERAL SIGN PROVISIONS 7 SEC. 15 WIND PRESSURE AND DEAD LOAD REQUIREMENTS 7 SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS 8 A. ATTACHED SIGN 8 B. MONUMENT SIGN 9 SCGROUND SIGN 9 . SEC. 17 PROHIBITED SIGNS 10 A. GENERAL 10 B. OBSCENE SIGNS 10 C. OBSTRUCTING DOORS,WINDOWS,OR FIRE ESCAPES 10 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFr\SIGN\704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page vi WIPP' " . D. OBSTRUCTING VISION/SIGHT TRIANGLE 10 • E. INTERFERENCE WITH TRAFFIC 10 F. PORTABLE SIGNS 10 G. CERTAIN ILLUMINATED SIGNS 10 H. SIGNS PROJECTING ON/OVER PUBLIC PROPERTY OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 10 I. ROOF SIGNS 11 J. SIGNS ON UTILITY POLES 11 ARTICLE V-SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS 11 SEC. 18 SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS 11 SEC. 19 PERMANENT SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT 11 A. BUSINESS SIGN 11 B. MENUBOARD SIGN 11 C. SUBDIVISION ENTRY SIGN 11 D. BULLETIN BOARD SIGN 11 E. DIRECTORY SIGN 12 F. INSTITUTIONAL SIGN 12 G. GASOLINE PRICING SIGN 12 H. DIRECTIONAL SIGN 12 SEC 20. PERMANENT SIGNS EXEMPT FROM PERMIT 13 A. HOME OCCUPATION SIGN 13 S SEC.21 TEMPORARY SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT 13 A. BANNER 13 B. MODEL HOME SIGN 13 C. SPECIAL PURPOSE SIGN 13 D. DEVELOPMENT SIGN 13 SEC.22 TEMPORARY SIGNS EXEMPT FROM PERMIT 14 A. SUBDIVISION MARKETING SIGN 14 B. BUILDER SIGN 14 C. REAL ESTATE SIGN 14 D. WINDOW SIGN 14 E. GARAGE/YARD SALE SIGN 15 ARTICLE VI-EXEMPTIONS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS 15 SEC.23 EXEMPT SIGNS 15 SEC.24 NONCONFORMING EXISTING SIGNS 15 SEC.25 SIGN COPY 15 SEC.26 APPENDICES 16 4111 LACITYDOCS\ORMDRAFnS1GN\704-A\DRAFT-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page vii SEC. 1 DEFINITIONS ARTICLE I-IN GENERAL A. GENERAL ALTER: To change the size, shape or outline, or type of sign or to change the electrical lighting, except for the replacement of lamps not brighter than the original or the replacement of a surface panel. ATTACH: To stick, tack, nail or otherwise affix a sign to any object; to paint, stencil, write, or otherwise mark on an object. BUILDING: A structure which has a roof supported by walls for the shelter, support, or enclosure of persons,animals,or chattel. BUILDING OFFICIAL: The Building Official of the City of Southlake,Texas,or his designee. CIVIC ORGANIZATION: An organization which offers community programs to citizen, city or civil affairs groups. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK: For construction of a sign shall be the point in time when the sign has been delivered to the site and attachment to a building has begun or holes are excavated for ground installation. DILAPIDATED OR DETERIORATED CONDITION: Any sign which in the opinion of the building official has any of the following characteristics: • (a)Where elements of the surface or background can be seen,as viewed from the normal viewing distance, to have portions of the finished material or paint flaked, broken off, or missing, or otherwise not in harmony with the rest of the surface;or (b)Where the structural support or frame members are visibly bent,broken,dented,or torn;or (c) Where the panel is visibly cracked, or in the case of wood and similar products, splintered in such a way as to constitute an unsightly or harmful condition;or (d)Where the sign or its elements are twisted or leaning or at angles other than those at which it was originally erected(such as may result from being blown or the failure of a structural support); or (e)Where the message or wording can no longer be clearly read by a person with normal eyesight under normal viewing conditions;or DISTANCE: Distance of signs from R.O.W. shall mean the shortest horizontal distance from the nearest R.O.W. to a vertical line to the ground from the nearest element of the sign or the shortest horizontal distance in a straight line between the nearest elements of signs. ERECT: To build, construct, attach, hang, place, suspend or affix. This shall also include the painting of signs on the exterior surface of a building or structure. FACADE: Any separate face of a building,including parapet walls and omitted wall lines,or any part of a building which encloses or covers usable space. Where separate faces are oriented in the same direction,or in the directions within 45 degrees of one another,they are to be considered as part of a single facade. GROSS SURFACE AREA OR AREA OF A SIGN: Methods of area measurement shall be in accordance 411 with Appendix'A'. HEIGHT: As applied to a sign, height shall be measured as the vertical distance between the highest part of the sign or its supporting structure,whichever is higher,and natural grade at the center of the base of the sign(see Appendix'A'for clarification). L:\CITYDOCSIORD\DRAFRSIGN\704-A\DRAFT-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 1 ppiPPPP- - ILLUMINATION: The enhancement of a sign utilizing electric lights, luminous tubes or other similar means. LEASE SPACE: An area of a building separated internally and intended for use by an individual tenant. LOGO: Any registered trademark of an organization,individual,company,or product which is commonly used in advertising to identify that organization,individual,company,or product. OBSOLETE: Any sign which advertises a business,use or purpose that is no longer in existence. PAD SI1"h: A tract, lot, or land lease intended for the single use of a freestanding building typically adjacent to street R.O.W.and may also be a portion of a tract or lot. PUBLIC PROPERTY: Any property which is owned by a governmental entity. It shall also include property for which the primary use is for the operations of a governmental entity. SCULPTED ALUMINUM PANEL: An aluminum sign panel with text or graphic depictions cut out from the panel,typically with a translucent material covering the cut-out from the inner side of the panel. SETBACK: The distance from the closest portion,whether the support or edge of the sign,to the right-of- way. SIGHT TRIANGLE: There shall be two different sight triangles as depicted in the Subdivision Ordinance. One shall be for public and/or private street intersections and the other for the intersection of private non- single family driveways with public or private streets. S SIGN: Every sign, name, number, identification, description, and announcement, declaration, demonstration, device, display, flag, banner, pennant, illustration, logo, balloon, streamer, valance, advertising display, poster, beacon, light or insignia, and structure supporting any of the same, affixed directly or indirectly to or upon any building or outdoor structure,or erected or maintained upon a piece of land,which directs attention to any object,project, service,place,activity,person,institution,organization, or business. SIGN, ATTACHED: Any sign attached to, applied on, or supported by any part of a building (including canopy fascia,walls and awnings)which encloses or covers usable space. SIGN,BANNER: A temporary sign made of cloth,flexible plastic or canvas material. SIGN, BUILDER: A temporary on-site sign identifying the builder or general contractor of a residential construction site. • SIGN, BULLETIN BOARD: A permanent on-site sign providing public information to the residential subdivision within which it is located. SIGN,BUSINESS: A permanent on-site sign that is used to identify a business,profession, organization, institution, service, activity or other nonresidential use conducted, sold or offered on the site where such sign is located. This sign may also identify the name of the site or development or may identify the occupants within the site or development. SIGN,DEVELOPMENT: A temporary on-site sign providing identification or information pertaining to a residential or commercial development to include the builder, property owner, architect, contractor, engineer, landscape architect, decorator, or mortgagee, within that development, but shall not include a • subdivision marketing sign. SIGN,DIRECTIONAL: A permanent on-site sign intended to aid in vehicular movement on the site. L:ICITYDOCSIORD\DRAFT\SIGNN704A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A/ Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 2 /I l( I pipppr- • SIGN, DIRECTORY: A permanent on-site sign providing direction to or identifying the buildings in the development. SIGN FACE: The surface of one side of a sign. For a monument sign,the sign face shall include the sign structure(excluding base). SIGN,GARAGE/YARD SALE: A temporary sign intended to advertise garage sales or yard sales. SIGN, GASOLINE PRICING: A permanent on-site sign which displays the price per gallon of fuel sold by that business,and which may be periodically changed to reflect changes in fuel prices. SIGN, GOVERNMENT: A sign erected by or on behalf of a federal, state or local government or an agency thereof. SIGN, GROUND: Any sign connected to the ground by legs,poles, or other supports and which is not an attached,portable,monument,or vehicular sign. SIGN, INSTITUTIONAL: A permanent on-site sign used to identify governmental and municipal agencies, public schools, churches, or similar public institutions, and used to communicate messages of public importance to the general public. SIGN,MENUBOARD: A permanent on-site sign which displays a menu and pricing for food services and may include an audible speaker and microphone integral to the sign. SIGN, MODEL HOME: A temporary real estate sign identifying a homebuilder's model home open for inspection. SIGN,MONUMENT: Any sign which is connected to the ground and which has no clear space for the full width of the sign between the bottom of the sign and the surface of the ground. SIGN, OFF-SITE: A sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service, good, product, or entertainment not related to the site upon which such sign is located or to which it is affixed. SIGN, ON-SITE: Any sign, the content of which relates to the site on which it is located, referring exclusively to businesses,commodities, services,products, goods, or entertainment on the site, or the sale, lease,or construction of those sites. SIGN, POLITICAL: A type of off-site sign which refers only to the_candidates or issues involved in a political election. SIGN,PORTABLE: Any sign which is not attached or affixed to the ground,a building,vehicle,or other fixed structure or object. Portable signs include those signs installed on wheels, trailers, skids, and similar mobile structures. SIGN,READERBOARD(electronic): A sign that utilizes alternating electronic data control components. SIGN, READERBOARD (manual): A•sign comprised of non-permanent letters, numerals or symbols, which allows a change of sign copy by adding,removing or rearranging said letters,symbols or numerals. SIGN,REAL ESTATE: A temporary sign intended to advertise real estate for sale or lease. SIGN, SPECIAL PURPOSE: A temporary sign that is either on-site or off-site that provides identification or information pertaining to a special event or occurrence sponsored by a non-profit or civic organization. SIGN,SUBDIVISION ENTRY: Any permanent on-site sign identifying a residential subdivision. L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFILSIGN\704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 ,Page 3 SIGN, SUBDIVISION MARKETING: A temporary sign used to market or advertise residential • subdivisions within the City and to direct interested persons to the subdivision location. SIGN,TEMPORARY: Any sign constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric,cardboard, wallboard, or other like materials,with or without frames, and any type sign not permanently attached to the ground, wall, or building,intended to be displayed for a short period of time only. SIGN,VEHICULAR: Any sign which is affixed to a vehicle. SIGN, WINDOW: Any sign located on the internal and/or external surface of the window, or is located within two feet(2')of the window,of any establishment. SITE: A lot,tract or pad site. ARTICLE II-ADMINISTRATION SEC.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENFORCEMENT It is the responsibility of the Building Official to interpret, administer and enforce the requirements of this ordinance. - SEC.3 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED No person shall erect,alter or display any sign nor shall any person allow the erection, alteration or display of any sign upon any property within the City owned or controlled by him without first obtaining a permit • to do so from the City of Southlake,except as hereinafter provided. No sign permit shall be released until after the building permit for the principal building on the site has been issued, except as hereinafter provided. SEC.4 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT - Application for a permit shall be made as required by this ordinance and the following information shall be submitted as separate documents: a. Application form shall be completed. b. General plan that illustrates: - Location of the building,structure,or tract to which or upon which the sign is to be attached or erected. -Position of the sign in relation to rights-of-way, easements,buildings, structures, existing signs, etc. c. Sign drawing that illustrates height, length, width, and all other dimensions associated with the sign. d. Letter from owner of the property stating that the applicant has permission to erect such signs. SEC. 5 FEES A. All fees for sign permits shall be in accordance with the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. B. An annual renewal fee for applicable temporary signs shall be determined in accordance with the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. 40 SEC.6 CONDITIONAL SIGN PERMIT A. GENERAL: Notwithstanding anything in this ordinance to the contrary, the erection of a sign or signs may be approved pursuant to this section under a conditional sign permit approved by the City Council. The purpose of this section is to allow for a specialized review of signs which may not be appropriate generally without certain restrictions,but which,if controlled as to the number,size,height,color,location,. L•\CrrYDOCS\ORDWRAF[1SIGN\704A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 4 � /4-i3 lighting,or relation to adjacent properties,would promote the health,safety,and welfare of the community. • Conditional permitting of signs shall not be based upon the content of the sign,but is intended to allow for the evaluation of the physical impact of the proposed sign on adjacent properties and to ensure adequate mitigation of potentially unfavorable factors,such as the number,size,height,color,location,lighting,and other potentially unfavorable impacts. B. APPLICATION: An application for a conditional sign permit shall be submitted to the Building Official and shall include all documents as required by Section 4 of this ordinance. Additionally,the applicant shall submit construction plans drawn by a registered professional engineer or architect in the State of Texas and also provide renderings of the particular sign types, facades,materials, compositions,dimensions,lighting, and colors. C. FEES: Fees for conditional sign permits shall be determined in accordance with the current fees schedule adopted by the City Council. D. ANNUAL RENEWAL FEES: An annual renewal fee for applicable temporary conditional signs shall be determined in accordance with the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. SEC.7 REVOCATION OF PERMITS The Building Official may suspend or revoke any permit issued under the provisions of this ordinance whenever it is determined that the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect or false information supplied, or whenever such permit is issued in violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance or any other ordinance of this City or laws of this state or the federal government. Such suspension or revocation shall be effective when communicated in writing to the person to whom the permit is issued,the owner of the sign, or the owner of the site upon which the sign is located. Upon such revocation, all construction • related to the revoked permit shall cease. A person may appeal the revocation of the sign permit to the City Council by filing an appeal in accordance with this ordinance. The City Council shall affirm, reverse, or modify the suspension or revocation and such decision shall be fmal. Upon final determination that the permit is properly revoked, any portion of the sign in place as a result of the permit shall be removed within 10 days by the owner of the sign or the owner of the site on which the sign is located. Failure to remove the sign shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance. SEC. 8 INSPECTION The Building Official shall periodically inspect each sign regulated by this ordinance for the purpose of ascertaining whether the same is obsolete and whether it is in need of removal or repair. SEC.9 PERMIT VALID FOR ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY(180)DAYS If the work authorized by a permit issued under this ordinance has not been commenced within one hundred eighty(180)days after the date of issuance,the permit shall become null and void. SEC. 10 INVESTIGATION FEES: WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT A. INVESTIGATION. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this ordinance has been commenced or completed without first obtaining a permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. B. FEE. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee,shall be collected whether or not a permit is then subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this ordinance. r:\cITYoocs\oRD\DRAAFINSIG \704-A'DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 5 • SEC. 11 REMOVAL OF SIGNS A. OBSOLETE SIGNS. Any sign,which the Building Official determines to be obsolete, shall be removed by the permit holder, owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located. For temporary signs, the sign must be removed as noted on the sign permit application or within three (3) days after receiving written notification to do so from the Building Official. For permanent signs, the sign must be removed by the permit holder, owner of the sign,or owner of the site on which the sign is located within a reasonable time period as determined by the Building Official. Upon failure to comply with such notice or • to file an appeal of the decision in accordance with this ordinance, the Building Official is authorized to cause the removal of such sign, and any expense incident thereto shall be paid by the permit holder,owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located. B. UNSAFE DILAPIDATED OR DETERIORATED SIGNS. If the Building Official determines that any sign is unsafe or insecure, or is dilapidated or deteriorated,he shall give written notice to remove or replace (in accordance with this ordinance) said sign to the person or persons responsible for such sign. If the permit holder, owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located fails to remove or repair the sign within ten(10) days after such notice or to file an appeal of the decision in accordance with this ordinance,the Building Official is hereby authorized to cause the removal of such sign. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the immediate removal, without notice, of any sign or portion of a sign which is determined by the Building Official to be an immediate threat or danger to the public health, safety, or welfare. Any expense incident to the removal of a sign pursuant to this paragraph shall be paid by the permit holder,owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located. The removal of the sign or portion of the sign shall be limited to the extent necessary to eliminate the threat to the public health, safety,and welfare. C. SIGNS ON UTILITY POLES. Any sign that is erected, constructed or otherwise attached to a utility • pole located upon any public right of way or utility easement may be removed by City personnel. The permit holder, owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located shall be charged a sign recovery fee in accordance with the city fee schedule to recover such sign from the City unless the permit holder or owner satisfactorily establishes that such sign was not placed in the right-of-way by the owner of such sign or by any authorized agent,representative, or employee of said owner. Any such sign removed by City personnel may be held for a period of seventy-two (72) hours and upon expiration of such time may be disposed. The City is not required to notify the permit holder or owner of the sign that it has been picked up or that disposal of the sign is imminent. D. SIGNS LN RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR ON PUBLIC PROPERTY: Any sign that is erected, constructed or otherwise located within or upon public right-of-way or on public property may be removed by City personnel and the permit holder or owner of such sign shall be charged a sign recovery fee in accordance with the city fee schedule to recover such sign from the City. No such fee shall be charged if the permit holder or owner satisfactorily establishes that such sign was not placed in the right-of-way by the permit holder or owner of such sign or by any authorized agent, representative or employee of said owner. Any such sign removed by City personnel may be held for a period of seventy-two(72)hours and upon expiration of such time may be disposed. The City is not required to notify the permit holder or owner of the sign that it has been picked up or that disposal of the sign is imminent. E. ILLEGALLY ERECTED SIGNS: Any temporary sign that is erected, constructed or otherwise displayed, which the Building Official determines to be in direct violation of this ordinance, may be removed by City personnel. The permit holder,owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located shall be charged a sign recovery fee in accordance with the city fee schedule to recover such sign from the City. Any such sign removed by City personnel may be held for a period of seventy-two (72) hours and upon expiration of such time may be disposed. The City is not required to notify the permit holder or owner of the sign that it has been picked up or that disposal of the sign is imminent. For • permanent signs,the sign must be removed by the permit holder,owner of the sign,or owner of the site on which the sign is located within a reasonable time period as determined by the Building Official. Upon failure to comply with such notice or to file an appeal of the decision in accordance with this ordinance,the L:\CITYDOCSIORD\DRAFRSIGN\704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 6 ppri- Building Official is authorized to cause the removal of such sign, and any expense incident thereto shall be paid by the permit holder,owner of the sign or owner of the site on which the sign is located. F. EXTENT OF SIGN REMOVAL: The Building Official shall determine to what extent the elements of the sign must be removed to comply with this section. This may include any of the following,but is not limited to the following: 1. SIGN COPY: Removal of the text or copy portion of the sign. 2. SIGN BOX: Removal of the portion of the sign excluding the structural support of the sign. • 3. ENTIRE SIGN: Removal of all structural elements of the sign. SEC. 12 FILING OF LIENS AGAINST PROPERTY The city is authorized to file a lien against any property which is not otherwise exempt to recover expenses _ incurred by the city for the removal of a sign or portion of a sign from the property,pursuant to Section 11 F. ARTICLE III-APPEALS AND VARIANCES SEC. 13 APPEALS Any decision rendered by the Building Official under this ordinance may be appealed to the City Council by any person,agent,or representative affected by such decision. Such appeal must be received within ten (10) days after the placement of a letter in the U.S. mail addressed to the address on the permit or the address of the current owner of record in the County tax records which states the written decision which has been rendered by the Building Official. Such appeal shall be filed in writing with the Building Official • specifying the grounds on which the appeal is based. The Building Official shall forthwith transmit to the City Council all documents pertaining to the appealed action. The City Council shall hear the appeal at a City Council meeting as soon as practicable thereafter to determine whether the decision-of the Building Official was in accordance with all ordinances and regulations. The decision of the City Council shall be fmal. SEC. 14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any restriction set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to the number, type, area, height, or setback of signs, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance,the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed,that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties,and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign Ordinance by filing the request with the Building Official. Any request for variance shall be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. ARTICLE IV-GENERAL SIGN PROVISIONS SEC. 15 WIND PRESSURE AND DEAD LOAD REQUIREMENTS • All signs shall be designed and constructed to withstand a wind pressure of not less than thirty(30)pounds per square foot of area and shall be constructed to receive dead loads as required by the Uniform Building Code. The sign permit application must include a statement signed by the applicant which states compliance with this requirement. L:\CITYDOCSIORD\DRAFPSIGN\704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 7 IFF 0 SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Signs may not be _ attached to light fixtures, poles, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, streets, utility poles, public buildings, fences,railings,public telephone poles,or trees. The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a three(3)square foot area used for building identification. 2. MINIMUM/MAXIMUM LEI-TER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six(6) inches. The maximum height allowed for letters or logos shall be based on the following criteria: Distance From R.O.W. * Maximum Letter/Logo Height Less than 100 ft. 12 inches 101 - 150 ft. 18 inches 151 -200 ft. 24 inches 201 -250 ft. 30 inches 251 -300 ft. 36 inches 301 and greater 42 inches * - For any lease space which does not front on a street, the maximum letter/logo height shall be based on the distance from the vehicular driveway access (see Appendix B' for further clarification). S3. MAXIMUM AREA: 0.75 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet(see Appendix'A'for further clarification). 4. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one attached sign per lease space shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. A secondary sign - may be permitted at a public entrance,provided the entrance is on another side of the building,but shall be limited to twenty-five percent(25%) of the primary or permitted sign size, whichever is more restrictive. The six (6) inch minimum letter/logo height will not apply to these secondary signs. No more than two (2)attached signs shall be allowed per lease space. Attached signs shall be located within the first story of the main exterior entrance for a building or lease space (see Appendix'B' for further clarification). 5. SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent(75%) . of the width of any building or lease space. In the event the lease space facade is horizontally articulated,the 75%rule shall apply to the allowed sign to be located on any single plane facade (see Appendix'B'for further clarification). • 6. ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof line of any building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend above the parapet wall. Signs shall be no closer vertically to the eave of the roofline or overhang than the predominant letter height(see Appendix B' for further clarification). Signs may be attached to a continuous plane fascia, if the sign does not extend above or below the projection of the fascia. Signs attached to fascia are only allowed when attached to structural canopy supported to the ground by columns constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure (See III 7. Appendix B'for further clarification). ILLUMINATION: Attached signsmayonlybe illuminated utilizinginternal lighting. Exterior letters with exposed neon lighting are not allowed. LCITYDOCSORD\DRAFrSIGN\704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A / Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 8 W'r 8. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") from the building,excluding signs attached to canopies. 9. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any facade (other than the main front of the building)which faces property zoned for single-family residential uses if the sign is within one hundred fifty feet(150')of the property line of said residential property. B. MONUMENT SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all monument signs which are allowed under this ordinance. 2. MINIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The minimum height allowed for letters or logos shall be six(6)inches. 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Four (4) feet, excluding monument base and sign structure. The monument base may be an additional eighteen(18) inches in height measured from ground level at the center of the base to the top of the base. The sign structure shall not exceed five(5)feet. 4. MAXIMUM AREA: One hundred(100) square feet per sign with a maximum area per sign face of fifty(50) square feet. The maximum area for the sign structure shall not exceed seventy(70) square feet (see Appendix'A'for measurement criteria). • 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one monument sign, excluding menuboard signs, shall be allowed along each street frontage on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. Monument signs may be no closer than five hundred(500)feet on any one site. • 6. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from any property line. 7. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: All monument sign bases shall be constructed of the same masonry material as the front building facade on the same site or shall be stone or brick. The sign structure must be constructed or covered with the same masonry material as the principal building, or stone, or brick. Sculpted aluminum sign panels will be allowed. All sign text and graphic elements shall be limited to a minimum of six (6) inches from the outer limits of the sign structure. 8. ILLUMINATION: Monument signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting for sculpted aluminum panels or a ground lighting source where the light itself and supporting structure are not visible from public R.O.W. C. GROUND SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all ground signs. 2. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen(15)feet from any property line. 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Three feet(3') 4. MAXIMUM AREA: Eight(8)square feet with a maximum of four(4)square feet per sign face. 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)sign per site. L:ICITYDOCnORD\DRAFPSIGN\704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 9 PriPr SEC. 17 PROHIBITED SIGNS • A. GENERAL Any sign which is not specifically permitted in Articles V and VI of this ordinance shall be prohibited. B. OBSCENE SIGNS No person shall erect or display on any site a sign in which the dominant theme of material taken as a whole appeals to a prurient interest in sex, or is patently offensive because it affronts community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters,and is utterly without redeeming social value. C. OBSTRUCTING DOORS,WINDOWS,OR FIRE ESCAPES No person shall erect or display on any site any sign which prevents free ingress to or egress from any door,window,or fire escape. D. OBSTRUCTING VISION/SIGHT TRIANGLE No person shall erect or display on any site any sign in such a manner as to obstruct free and clear vision at any location, street, intersection, or driveway. All signs placed at any intersection shall prevent such problem by observing a sight triangle as provided for in Section 1, 'Defmitions." E. INTERFERENCE WITH TRAFFIC No person shall erect or display on any site any sign which interferes with vehicular or pedestrian traffic as a result of the position, size, shape, movement, color, fashion, manner, or intensity of illumination or any other characteristics causing such interference. Nor shall any person erect or allow to be displayed any sign in such a manner as to interfere with, obstruct the view of, or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device, including, without limitation, signs making use of the words "stop," "go," "look," "slow," "danger,"or any other similar word,phrase,symbol or character,or employ any red,yellow,green, or other colored lamp or light in such a manner as to cause confusion or otherwise interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic. F. PORTABLE SIGNS No person shall erect or display on any site any portable sign; except, however, that upon a majority vote by the City Council, a conditional use permit may be issued to any non-profit organisation for an on-site portable sign. Permits shall be issued for one thirty (30) day period with at least ninety (90) days separation between permits. G. CERTAIN ILLUMINATED SIGNS 1. No sign shall be illuminated to such an intensity or in such a manner as to cause a glare or brightness to a degree that it constitutes a hazard or nuisance to traffic. Moving, flashing, intermittent lighted,changing color,revolving,or similarly constructed signs shall not be allowed. 2. No lighted sign shall be erected or displayed within one-hundred fifty(150)feet of a single-family residentially zoned property unless the lighting is shielded from view of the residentially zoned property and indirect light does not exceed 1/2 lumen measured from any property line of the residentially zoned property. • H. SIGNS PROJECTING ON/OVER PUBLIC PROPERTY OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY It shall be prohibited to erect or display any type of sign on or over public right-of-way(ROW) or other public property, unless the same be erected by the City, County, State or other authorized governmental agency,or with the permission of the City,for public purposes. LACITYDOCS\ORD\DRAMSIGN\704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 10 V ' -7P--I9 Pir" I. ROOF SIGNS Anysign erected on a vertical framework supported byand located immediatelyand entirely over the roof of a building is prohibited. Any sign attached to a fascia extending above the projection of the fascia shall be prohibited. The painting or otherwise affixing of signs on a roof is prohibited. J. SIGNS ON UTILITY POLES No person shall erect or display any sign on any utility pole located upon any public right-of-way or utility easement. ARTICLE V-SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS SEC. 18 SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS This article regulates the type of sign structure allowed for each type of sign permitted by this ordinance. Each of the signs identified in this article is subject to the general sign provisions set forth in Article IV except where modifications to the general regulations are noted. SEC. 19 PERMANENT SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT • Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this article shall be applicable to all of the following signs. A. BUSINESS SIGN Si. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: None • B. MENUBOARD SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MINIMUM LE 1-1'ER/LOGO HEIGHT: Not applicable b. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Six feet(6'). c. MAXIMUM AREA: Twenty four (24) square feet. Only one face will be allowed per sign. d. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: No more than two(2)signs per site. e. LOCATION LIMITATIONS: All menuboard signs must be located at the side or rear of the principal building. If two (2) signs are erected, signs must be at least eighteen(18) feet apart. f. ILLUMINATION: Internal lighting may be utilized for sign panel. C. SUBDMSION ENTRY SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Attached sign may not project above top of wall b. MAXIMUM AREA: Thirty-two(32)square feet for attached sign c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) monument sign or two (2) attached wall plaque signs(not a combination thereof)per street entrance d. PLACEMENT OF SIGN: Monument sign may be located on median at street entrance if approved by City Council on Concept Plan, in developer's agreement, or by a separate application. S D. BULLETIN BOARD SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached,monument and/or ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MINIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: Not applicable L:\CITYDOCSIORD\DRAFRSIGN\704A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.'704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 11 b. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Six(6)feet • c. MAXIMUM AREA: Eighteen(18)square feet. Only one face allowed per sign. d. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)per subdivision entrance,not to exceed two (2)per subdivision e. MINIMUM SETBACK: Not applicable f. LOCATION WHERE ALLOWED: No closer than one-hundred (100) feet from an arterial. Sign must be located on designated common area and maintained by the home owner's association. g. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Bulletin board must have a lockable covering. Masonry requirement shall not apply. E. DIRECTORY SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MINIMUM SETBACK: Seventy-five(75)feet from drive entrance at right-of-way. b. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)sign per street entrance. c. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Not applicable d. LOCATIONS WHERE ALLOWED: Only distance measurements shall apply. F. INSTITUTIONAL SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. GENERAL: i. Sign must be integral to the permitted sign for the site. ii. Messages on readerboards, whether electronic or manual, may not scroll, flash, or change more frequently than once a day. • iii. Manual readerboard signs using alphabetical lettering must have a lockable covering. b. MAXIMUM AREA: Readerboard display cannot exceed two-thirds (2/3) of the permitted gross surface area per face of the sign,excluding monument sign border. c. ILLUMINATION: Internal illumination may be utilized for sign panel. G. GASOLLNE PRICING SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. GENERAL: i. Sign must be integral to the permitted sign for the site. ii. Price-per-gallon display,whether electronic or manual,may not scroll, flash, or change more frequently than once a day. b. MINIMUM LETTER HEIGHT: Not applicable for the fuel classification (i.e. • "Unleaded","Diesel",etc.)and the price-per-gallon display c. MAXIMUM AREA: Price-per-gallon display cannot exceed two-thirds (2/3) of the permitted gross surface area per face of the sign,excluding monument sign border. d. NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)per site. e. ILLUMINATION: Internal illumination may be utilized for fuel classification and price- per-gallon panels only. H. DIRECTIONAL SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Three(3)feet b.c. MAXIMUM AREA: Eight(8) square feet with a maximum of four(4) square feet per • sign face. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Maximum of two(2)signs per site. rACMIDGCS\ORDIDRAFRSIGM704-MnRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 12 liP . SEC.20 PERMANENT SIGNS EXEMPT FROM PERMIT 40 A permit shall not be required for the following signs: A. HOME OCCUPATION SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MINIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: Not applicable b. MAXIMUM AREA: One(1)square foot c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1) d. LOCATIONS WHERE ALLOWED: Any sign must be non-illuminated and mounted flat against the wall at the entrance of the home occupation. SEC.21 TEMPORARY SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT A permit shall be required for the following signs: A. BANNER 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM AREA: 0.5 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed fifty(50)square feet. , b. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)per site c. DURATION: Maximum fifteen(15)days,twice per calendar year with a sixty(60) day separation between permits. B. MODEL HOME SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument and/or ground 110 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Five(5)feet for ground signs b. MAXIMUM AREA: Sixty-four (64) square feet with a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet per sign face c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)sign per builder per subdivision d. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Not applicable C. SPECIAL PURPOSE SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached and/or ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT:Nine(9)feet for ground signs b. MAXIMUM AREA:' Sixty-four (64) square feet with a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet per sign face c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: Three(3)total per event or occasion,not to exceed • two(2)off-site signs and one(1)on-site sign d. PLACEMENT TIME: Twenty-one (21) days, must be removed within three (3) days after termination of the event. No more than twice a year: e. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Not applicable f. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Not applicable D. DEVELOPMENT SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE:Monument and/or ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT:Five(5)feet b. MAXIMUM AREA: Sixty-four (64) square feet with a maximum of thirty-two (32) • square feet per sign face c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)per site d. DURATION: Sign may be installed at any time after the issuance of the building permit for a commercial development or approval of the developers agreement for a residential subdivision. The sign must be removed within one (1) year or upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a commercial development and upon the issuance of a L\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFRSIGN\704-A\DRAF1-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 13 • certificate of occupancy on seventy-five percent(75%) of the lots within the subdivision 11Pr" for a residential subdivision. e. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: Not applicable SEC.22 TEMPORARY SIGNS EXEMPT FROM PERMIT A permit shall not be required for the following signs: A. SUBDIVISION MARKETING SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)sign for every twenty(20)platted lots,not to exceed a total of four(4)signs b. LOCATION OF SIGNS: No sign may be placed closer than fifty feet (50') from an intersecting R.O.W. ,c. MINIMUM SETBACK: Not applicable d. PLACEMENT TIME: 12:00 noon Friday to 12:00 noon Monday e. DURATION: Signs may be placed upon subdivision approval. The signs shall be valid for one(1)year from subdivision approval or upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy on seventy-five percent(75%)of the lots. divi ion for;whouses.'er ;t`teed o" 1 ` r cr. fa owingr,reg a ions: definition a emp i r• l r � it iviSLon uil s and . 'e•rs an'JiIiteres ei Ii n i i i i i i is thrmo igns ,dverti ing th s me item per gro g : ° p e + , ,�: �; -r; 'fifty feetr(50� rom int s ding t? ,sig advertise e terna i �, ''t,E �. ��-:, ,tea��. , �• � .� ,,� •ten feet 10')�a art, placemen fr i n�2 00 noon 0k12 00 `no, a (in'a�, r,' r, + r o i signskshall.,oecur in.i eremen t�25% of the Mn 'i .e'' a ,Te j e i : :4 ui . '.I ' . S1gns a he at '.of sXlr C ver :three �.r'ion te �� na e i a• '� 2/0 tint.,la • r' lalions.01 °.22 'I a B. BUILDER SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. DURATION: Signs may only be placed after issuance of a building permit and must be removed upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. b. MINIMUM SETBACK: Not applicable C. REAL ESTATE SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached,monument,and/or ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MINIMUM LE FIER/LOGO HEIGHT: Not applicable b. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Five (5) feet above grade for ground signs; below roof line for attached c. MAXIMUM AREA: Sixty-four (64) square feet with a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet per sign face d. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One(1)per site e. MINIMUM SETBACK: Not applicable for ground signs four(4) square feet or less per face in area D. WINDOW SIGN Window signs may not obscure more than fifteen percent(15%) of the window area per facade,measured and located within ten(10)vertical feet from the at-grade exterior entrance to the lease space. The area of the sign shall be measured by the smallest box that could be drawn around the continuity of the sign(see Appendix B' for further clarification). No illuminated window signs shall be allowed within two feet of the window glazing except for open/closed signs. L:\CITYDOCSIORD\DRAFr sIGM704-A\DRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 14 E. GARAGE/YARD SALE SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: Four(4)per sale;only one(1)off-site sign per sale shall be allowed along any numbered highway(1709, 1938, 114); all signs must display the street address of sale b. MINIMUM SETBACK: Not applicable c. PLACEMENT TIME: 12:00 noon Thursday to 12:00 noon Monday or on any legal holiday d. FREQUENCY LIMITATION: Not to exceed twice per year ARTICLE VI-EXEMPTIONS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS SEC. 23 EXEMPT SIGNS The following signs are exempted from the requirements of this ordinance: A. Vehicular signs, unless the sign is used or intended to be used as an on-site or off-site sign. It shall be prima facie evidence that a sign is used as an on-site or off-site sign if a vehicle is parked at the same location for a continuous period exceeding seventy-two (72) hours. No person shall attach any sign to a trailer, skid, or similar mobile structure, where the primary use of such structure is to provide a base for such sign or to constitute the sign itself. This provision shall not be interpreted to prohibit identification signs on vehicles used for business purposes,nor shall it be interpreted to prohibit bumper stickers. B. Warning and security signs. C. Government signs and signs for non-profit organizations sponsored by government including flags, • insignia, legal notices, informational, directional, and traffic signs which are legally required or necessary to the essential functions of government agencies. D. "No Dumping"and"No Trespassing"signs. E. Signs in public parks placed inside ballfield fencing by the City,which are intended for advertising to raise funds for recreation programs which have copy on only one face with the copy facing toward the interior of the field. F. Political signs, unless affixed to the ground or a grounded structure located within public right-of-way or on public property. SEC.24 NONCONFORMING EXISTING SIGNS All signs that are lawfully in existence on the date of adoption of this ordinance may exist in their present form,but no such signs shall be altered or moved unless a permit is issued pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance. Permits granted prior to the passage of this ordinance shall be renewed only if the applicant complies with all provisions of this ordinance. Any legal, non-conforming sign which has been substantially destroyed or dismantled for any purpose other than maintenance shall be deemed as completely destroyed if the cost of repairing the sign is more than 60%of the cost of erecting a new sign of the same type at the same location. Under this provision,the sign shall be removed and a permit shall be required to erect a new sign. SEC.25 SIGN COPY • Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary,any sign authorized in this ordinance is allowed to contain non-commercial(ideological)copy in lieu of any other copy. LACITYDOCS\ORD\DRAFILSIGM704-A\DRAFT-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 15 SEC.26 APPENDICES • It is anticipated that the following appendices will be changed periodically by the Building Official in response to changes in the administration of this ordinance. • • N LACTIYDOCS ORD\DRAFRSIGN\704-MDRAFr-3.DOC SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 16 lipprr APPENDIX 'A' • METHODS OF AREA MEASUREMENT ATTACHED SIGNS AND GROUND SIGNS EXHIBIT A-1 Attached sign 12' I 6' I 12' HEIGHT: 3' 2, -< I} ��eST iiui':�ig 1 `M:,ti LETTER HEIGHT: 12" 3' 1i" _- _ ,, a-4 `:SDI G N�>'= w t�-� .............. MAXIMUM ALLOWED AREA: 22.5 s.f. (0.75 x 30) :. ' "` "L _ MEASURED AREA SHOWN: 18 s.f. (3'x 6') 14' `' NOTES: Area limited to 0.75 square feet for every - one foot of width of building or lease space not to " _ a: exceed 400 square feet; signs shall be limited in =n width to the middle seventy five percent(75%)of - _ riy the width of any single plane facade for any building or lease space. 30' 1 111 EXHIBIT A-2 Attached signs 75% 40 75"S —6'6" 7'-6" 6' 2-6 15'--1-7�-� HEIGHT: 2'&1' LETTER HEIGHT: 10"& 12" 2' io ' '"" Sign Wave s IGN HERE , ,, ?r I MAXIMUM ALLOWED AREAS: 15 s.f. (0.75 x 20) &15 s.f. (0.75 x 20) E.. 77: ` '(:;:. _ MEASURED AREAS SHOWN: 15 s.f. (2'x 7.5')& . `= . .. 15 s.f. (1'x 15') NOTES: Area limited to 0.75 square feet for every _ ('< one foot of width of building or lease space not to = exceed 400 square feet;signs shall be limited in ., 'l " ` ' -`'z width to the middle seventy five percent(75%)of l `."" ` "' the width of any single plane facade for any building 20' 20' or lease space. EXHIBIT A-3 Ground sign /2'_ HEIGHT: 3' Sign 2' • MAXIMUM AREA ALLOWED: 4 s.f.per sign face 3' MEASURED AREA SHOWN: 4 s.f.(2'x 2') I I L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAF"I\SIGN\704-A\APPENDDO.VSD SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A -4aft 3 November 25,1998 Page 17 WIPP. APPENDIX 'A' METHODS OF AREA MEASUREMENT 410 MONUMENT SIGNS EXHIBIT A-4 Monument sign-attached lettering HEIGHT: 3' MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIGN AREA: 50 s.f. per face 12' MEASURED SIGN AREA SHOWN: 27 s.f. (3'x 9') -1'5' • 9' • 1.5' MAXIMUM ALLOWED STRUCTURE AREA: 70 s.f.per face , -— MEASURED STRUCTURE AREA SHOWN: 48 s.f. (4'x 12') 4, 3 _ "" NOTES: The sign structure must be constructed or covered - -- - -- with the same masonry material as the principal building, or ' stone,or brick. All sign text and graphic elements shall be limited to a minimum of six(6) inches from the outer limits of the sign structure. Sign may be illuminated utilizing a ground , lighting source,where the light itself and supporting structure may not be visible from public R.O.W. EXHIBIT A-5 Monument sign-sculpted aluminum panel 14' 9" I 12.5' I 9" HEIGHT: 4' MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIGN AREA: 50 s.f.per face m. MEASURED SIGN AREA SHOWN: 50 s.f. (4'x 12.5'IIII �- -� MAXIMUM ALLOWED STRUCTURE AREA: 70 s.f. per face 6 5'6" MEASURED STRUCTURE AREA SHOWN: 70 s.f. (5'x 14') 6" ,.,,, - .. -µ--- - NOTES: The sign base and/or structure must be constructed or covered with the same masonry material as the principal - - ' -- --`r building, or stone, or brick. All sign text and graphic elements sloped ground shall be limited to a minimum of six(6)inches from the outer limits of the sign structure. Sculpted aluminum sign panels may be illuminated utilizing internal lighting. EXHIBIT A-6 Monument sign-masonry panel HEIGHT: 3' 12' MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIGN AREA: 50 s.f. per face —1'-6" i 9' 1 1'-6"— MEASURED SIGN AREA SHOWN: 27 s.f. (3'x 9') 1 iiimmumummimiumffillimoll MAXIMUM ALLOWED STRUCTURE AREA: 70 s.f. perface -..' `;.. _...,.' _ —`f,w ' 5' 3' LOGO .ice `'{ w._.>; r � MEASURED STRUCTURE AREA SHOWN: 60 s.f.(5'x 12') t'- • j .,,.. r I. 0 NOTES: The base covered with the same masonry material as theconstructed principal or 1 III"'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII building,or stone,or brick.All sign text and graphic elements 1' - shall be limited to a minimum of six(6)inches from the outer limits of the sign structure. Sign may be illuminated utilizing a ground lighting source,where the light itself and supporting structure may not be visible from public R.O.W. L:\CITYDOCS1OIW DRAFRSIGN\7o4-A\APPENDIX3.VSD SIGN ORDINANCE NO.70Q41 Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 18 PPIIIF1 APPENDIX 'B' • SELECTED GRAPHIC CLARIFICATIONS Sections 16.A.2 and 16.A.4 -For any lease space which does not front on a street,the maximum letter/logo height shall be based on the distance from the vehicular driveway access. Only one attached sign per street frontage shall be allowed on any site along said street frontage, unless otherwise specifically provided. A secondary sign may be permitted at a public entrance, provided the entrance is on another side of the building, but shall be limited to twenty-five percent(25%)of the primary or permitted sign size,' whichever is more restrictive. The six(6)inch minimum letter/logo height will not apply to these secondary signs. No more than two (2)attached signs shall be allowed per lease space. Drive Parking 120' max. 18"letter/logo max. 18"letter/logo max. 18"letter/logo permitted permitted permitted �� •y primary sign primary sign primary sign max. 12 letter/logo € E secondary sign at secondary sign at n - public entrance publicic entrance secondary sign secondary sign 25%area of primary sign 25%area of primary sign 0 ' .. . . Parking • Section 16.A.4- Attached signs shall be limited to within the first story of the main exterior entrance for a building or lease space. r': - • • _�=�.- :' - � yr '-.r ••. Signs Signs signs Sign %„:'"-° �,.:��; ;:I Makers `:'�`'•=i��;,: :'..�<.,<..�;� E r • r,: _:_- T ..r_c , -s 4 r le..,:';.!,. ,-.::,�,,-. Signs ByUs :.... i:.-;.�;z:: Sign Shoppe �-�v" �I 9 „;.-..-L:;,,,r.,;;;;;;-,,r.::,'-....;...: -• Ys �; yr r, .�'=1, i'"a»` 2`. L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRA[•'ISSIGM704-A\AppENDIX3.VSD SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 19 PIPPI - APPENDIX 'B' 0 SELECTED GRAPHIC CLARIFICATIONS Section 16.A.5-Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent(75%)of the width of any building or lease space or single plane facade. 75% ,-75%—. ,-75%—, SINE='&'SONS•SIGNS', - I: SUBS .W _ I - `- IGN la I iY , _ I ' 'I I : ; _ 1 : = ,,,,,,-,: .: , --...,';-- .,:.„.:..:: :„ :,-,-,,:':-.:.::,,::: . I. Ill , \ ,,, , ,,:_.:,:„. ::., ,, _ :, , ,,,, ,.........._ Section 16.A.6- Signs shall be no closer vertically to the eave of the roofline or overhang than the permitted letter height. ,.,-, t.;;:'::--''-'•• . r am: IIIIII , llllll . — 24" 24"— 111111 • - - 'd '-- IIIIII uIR �. SIGN iiiiii gill Rill! ulm .::,_... `. ulnl IIIIII : ` f IIIIII IIIIII . ilti� _ IIIIII IIIIII ;;-.Y ���:�;_ III!' 111111 Mill • IIIIII -- , .., IIIIII luluIIIIII moilIIIIII L:\CITYDGCS\GRD\DRAFISSIGN\704-AAPPENDIX3.VSD SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A 'n Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 20 �-�I APPENDIX 'B' • SELECTED GRAPHIC CLARIFICATIONS Section 16.A.6 -Signs may be attached to a continuous plane fascia provided the sign does not extend above or below the projection of the fascia. Such signs are only allowed when attached to structural canopy supported to the ground by columns constructed of similar masonry material as the primary structure. Sign —► • '1 I-. Column —► ._ Section 22.D -Window signs may not obscure more than fifteen percent(15%)of the window area per facade,measured and located within ten (10)vertical feet from the at-grade exterior entrance to the lease space. The area of the sign shall be measured by the smallest box that could be drawn around the continuity of the sign. No illuminated window signs shall be allowed within two feet of the window glazing except for open/closed signs. r . WINDOW AREA: 108 s.f. (9'x 12') :;;-... MAXIMUM ALLOWED WINDOW SIGN AREA: *SALE* `= 16.2 s.f. (15%of 108 s.f.) 9'. 8 • 10' MEASURED WINDOW SIGN AREA SHOWN: 16 s.f. (2'x 8') - 12' L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\DRAPT\SIGN\704-A\APPENDIX3.VSD SIGN ORDINANCE NO.704-A Draft 3 November 25,1998 Page 21 T)142n City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT • November 25, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-113 PROJECT: Second Reading/Ordinance No. 480-291 Rezoning/Tracts 1B and 1B1,James Thornhill Survey.Abstract No. 1505 STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as being Tracts 1B and 1B1 situated in the James Thornhill Survey, Abstract No. 1505, and being approximately 5.0 acres. PURPOSE: Purpose of this request is to rezone the property to accommodate home construction. LOCATION: On the north side of West Continental Boulevard approximately 250' east of Southlake Hills Drive. OWNERS: Kaeini Family First Limited Partnership and Raman Chandler APPLICANT: Kaeini Family First Limited Partnership CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Twenty-eight(28) RESPONSES: Nine(9)responses were received within the 200' notification area: • Raul L. and Helen S. Regaldo, 1006 Southlake Hills Dr., Southlake, Texas, opposed. "1. The existing zoning provides 'green space' buffer between existing residential subdivisions. 2. Continental Blvd. cannot take the additional automobile or construction traffic without experiencing further deterioration." (Received October 28, 1998). • Thomas L. and Tracy Christensen, 1003 Southlake Hills Dr., Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Prefer to have the land behind our home undeveloped!" (Received October 28, 1998). • John J. Gagnon, 1005 Southlake Hills Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Need more details on water drainage, concern on existing trees, confusion on 1 acre lots versus 5000 sq. foot home City of Southlake, Texas on 2 lots." (Received November 2, 1998). • Matthew R. Belaus, 1311 Northridge, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Letter from landowner (Kaeini) contradicts the plan to divide into 4 lots. Other issues are drainage, landscaping, environmental impact." (Received November 2, 1998). • Mark and Lisa Sharp, 1009 Southlake Hills Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Drainage (will there be problems?). Clarify where the house will be (which lot?). How many trees will be taken out?" (Received November 2, 1998). • Joseph J. Bectol, 1000 Hidden Knoll Court, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Drainage problems exist and are not resolved. Flooding will occur if not taken into account and corrected. Siting of house on 2 lots indicate potential for sell of all lots separately. Has environmental impact statement been conducted." (Received November 2, 1998). • Daphne Biddle, 1011 Southlake Hills Drive, Southlake,Texas, undecided; "We need clarification as to the drainage problems that will occur if no plans are made now." (Received November 2, 1998). • Henry P. Nagy, 1313 Northridge, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Until the city of Southlake can determine the impact on water drainage and address this formally." (Received November 5, • 1998). • Terrence and Barbara Torrey, 1007 Southlake Hills Drive, Southlake, Texas, opposed. "Not enough information. Area provides a buffer between neighbor hoods." (Received November 5, 1998). Attached is a letter sent by the owner and applicant to the surrounding homeowners, regarding their plans for the property. P&Z ACTION: November 5, 1998; Approved (7-0). COUNCIL ACTION: November 17, 1998; Approved (7-0) First Reading. STAFF COMMENTS: Please note that a change of zoning to the "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District does not require a Concept Plan Review by Staff. A super-majority (6 out of 7) vote of the City Council will be required for approval of this item due to the opposition within 200' exceeding 20% of the total land area. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-113Z.W PD L a_ LETTER SENT BY APPLICANT TO SURROUNDING HOMEOWNERS ..I L BUT M I N► .0 fl ySaF 0 tt `Ica , r4 � NG },PAtan OF bWE KJE br NE Lids i `1O4IQS cwi\) T 3,75 ticiee5 1...ccAT��3 CIS -NE t oQT 1 S i0L OF I SOU' DfuWE 6LUOr ApP2OK , :D SCE` s i CF SoO i Lj k1 HILLS Y CRC,S rIGUL.0 1U011 F UL7 `IOU OF E ZcN i k.L- C FAA N(4= 12eaEs , J NAiE TPAGO To PCSSGNALLB commci w oR`iOICE f(U hE 13alR u!I TO A SL�e2 AN`{ GU-11oNS cR (C(vCQIVS tree. 1i 1 APE- Nor ELGpe- 2Si .3US IT f1 Fft1l (LL-? CF 51 tUptwn i i7 10 .BUILD 0Ui2 'nnLsni o I N SOOT Lc kE - R .uQ�� to RE-zoNci FiCf1 1a ICOLDJRAL. TO i Si L LL= Eft`►I L? F}Cf f11 )i f1Of6 Pu61iL - . (WIDE ME LAND INTO LDTSI iO .ROILO OUP F}OhE OM N - Z L� Tz;\vMI S E J3Psc1 OP P120i i'1 i4N0 `L MJE ENE LC T IJ;\ rQO 1 &L E . IF T1-e2E ARE AO GUEST/O(\JS 012 CONC.eNS wE c PP k 8E CO IU C i O (rT g i 7 - i-rg I -S i a a . t E W(LL �3. t7LW-O i O FOD Ccw IVS Vae(r) ( V RECD r Oli 0 21998 7g-3 i8!t� ~ 8 i721C! L3 a r • - -- -- �� J.4 : 3BI �t ; 73 i f89, ' p ' ' Tii! w ' TR 313 s x IM 1110411.0 .14441111A 'eVim Aittin.c.- k lirl Wit .E V ! tIW RkPA ri• ►��4son 64 ' -.• 1.1 �11.. 1—r- SLRVEY �'k t :i SURVEY p s*�+ �0- M= . ' ../II ..-‘431143%jile "A k ihnikull .II. t'` �••�� �ileall 'I't&% 1,�1���► `��f�'' �1 . ..q.! , 1 lirdiarj7SICOVIIPIPOMP VFW* TA:.\,\,'s TR ID . nkVIC Vaieglibta AII LlitertLirialgi At VW& A IOW *Vevalt-11 22 AC 2: ,... -.._ _ 11111.51111111111161127 \ 1/2 .4111,....14, atiPlet'w 11114 US k . %li - --V . '-'' rittilrailzAlltaliqmilb ,:SURVEY - r ' fl!� ,tea ri i a���� r w iT 'W impourer‘ itt4 • iii '4 -4. v,:k! 1 ill:tiirkWilA*At VIA V -..• • '-- ,..__.-- laregball 21111111111/4116- ..21111irawniainl. • *.".. API" 77r-I '- mtitl TR2A „ a, 411617.;ffilea Li ill 116147.5 di ,,..4,0 1 1 j ..a....r, , t III an Et .......: 11,-*Liu IV ,S,. ,_.* ,,,t1 Act& 17 I laDIC 273 It . Z Ma IC YR 2 An 46---. mumikkariiikt --.(-- I-ni IL 7\c-1 s2 re:fl i I_ WI 1 I I IX i .4 1- - 1111LIPIrt" TR 3A i . WitZIP:. RI011* f , iU • 7iQl 11141W di ,, l. _ v -744 -.#%::::.- • _;17,-zoliAgf-fo imik Zil k 1111,WAlt:V• -.'s' S -5•) •41 --, 4 • •7: ••5 tip ia`NI7F" , i 1 1 - - ,t -; , .. ARM c >- ,may i 1 1 • ZmI -' 1 2 1 o J 1 01 l 0S TRACT MAP 0`i . 7g—y i 3 : 141 g [p_ jil�k: 1 ` pi 1p 140 1 }3 116 131 t ilia I , IN t3s R 2 kj g� 5i /(' � ' z 5 ? y s 3 s g 5 4 r �* 3 FAT_ 1 E 2 r 4 ! 3 ; c0 I Inn , r Itn 40 - U • j6 ? 2 ne ,oi T� 1 ' 7 a 8 0 2 z,I "° �g tIc. 1a • ► g : d p no , _ L W R E• R g $e v �' L 7 g 1 =! 12SO - 1 ,� z itil Y11 10 sA $ 1 = p a "SF-24A" A I�1 8vo • r` �• -_ ! • �0 zt 110 u Z to ►M 113 'C• 5 `� 1 ' I,� NORTHRIDGE DR II✓) - W 170 R •rD.GALASKI g n q tac ,« �; z s oET) z W �� LL 1 YIILL DN N D .. x 7 J_LOWE x, ,„ Ni ± C . A s T J: J �T 605 A 200, 1� U Ile no 11e PEARSON 1�0�« :b Dc T.CHRISTENSEN�• _ ,� 143 3ta r 1a 111 s D.CROSS J.BECTOLs a TR 1A4 R. REGALDO r. GAGNON x 1.21 AC ,O 5 I_ m 19 boo W � � o q ,.o 3.38 ACcia Q '�+ 1.1 '� TR 1A1 s_ T. FULLER L.BONET ; 1.0 AC 4 T.TORREY ...a II B.BARTHOLOMEW 11° 'SF-20A' ,a o TR 1A6 .29 AC / r. 3 '� K.MOORE �Va TR 1A6A .50 AC 3 x S. 1 ;J 2 M.SHARP / , • a 0 TR 1 AB EARNEST '0 K.MOORE - - .81 AC R 2 __ \ D.BIDDLE ' a" AG" 1 „ iW r K.MOORE a TR 1A9 0/ 1.10 AC too — — CONTINENTAL BLVD - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - -- - - T 113 Ila 164 J. HOLLSTEIN. J. pOLAK E. ROBERTSON •T. DILL :—. _--i U, R I 5 lea44 .,,L 1 II!, 2 D.TOMLIN .� I C.VIANE w 42 �� s - T. GARDNER m.1 zao - 10R 3 30R _ f g s g d 13 .. "SF=20B" ' 7 I 29 172 s ` I a g S ►-+ 4 WIQ 1 9 a = 36 _ 1n - d = - 28 s 1e3 6 CI 123 Ea+ R p � 5 - ? 418 � 37 d - 10 s ,I. O u 2- -� tiZ ?\ - E ADJACENT OWNERS 0 8 0 2 AND ZONING i8-Sat [ 22 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-291 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 1B AND 1B1 SITUATED IN THE JAMES THORNHILL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1505, AND BEING APPROXIMATELY 5.0 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"FROM"AG"AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL • ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and • L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-291.WPD Page 1 V , • WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural , District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably • expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, . S LACITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\450.291.W PD Page 2 . '7g-7 • amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tracts 1 B and 1 B 1 situated in the James Thornhill Survey,Abstract No. 1505, and being approximately 5.0 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from"AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable • and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future;to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the • community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CAS PS\480-291.W PD Page 4 7.6-5 pv • WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is • a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: 1 SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby • L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-291.WPD Page 3 1 6- S PV . 0 among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be • declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described.herein. SECTION 7. Any person,firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued 0 L:\C ITYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-29 L W PD Page 5 PPV . 0 violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal,whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. • SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY 0 L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-291.W PD Page 6 • PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY • APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: • CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: • L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-291.W PD Page 7 Pr • EXHIBIT "A" WHEREAS The Kaeini Family Limited P'artnership is the owner of a tract of • land as conveyed by deed in Volume 12425,P. 2392 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas and including the SAVE&EXCEPT TRACT which was retained by C.R. Chandler& wife R.R. Chandler from the original deed recorded in Volume 9985,-Page 893 all of which are situated in the James Thornhill Survey,Abst. 1505 in the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas and being more particularly described as follows: •' BEGINNING at the southwest corner of said tract,same being in the south line of said Thornhill Survey; • THENCE N 00°05'13" W along the west line of said tract, pass' s theast corner of Lot 1, Block I of Southlake Hills Phase I as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide Plat Records of Tarrant County,Texas and in all 659.97' to the northwest corner of said `= • Tract 2, same being the southwest corner of Lot 7, Block 1 of said Southlake Hills Phase I; • : . • THENCE N 89°27'47"E along the north line of said tract and the-south line of Lots 7-9 of said Southlake Hills Phase,I for 329.68'.to the southeast corner of said Lot 9; " THENCE S 00°04'42"E along the east line of said tract and the west line of said - Southlake Hills East for.662.37' to a point in the said south line of the J. Thornhill Survey; • THENCE S 89°52'49"W along said line for 329.57' to the'POINT'OF'BEGINNING and CONTAINING 217,935 sclare feet or 5.00 acres of land. • • L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\ZBA\PENDING\480-291.ORD Page 8 78-13 City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT November 25, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-131 PROJECT: Site Plan /Southridge Center • STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for Southridge Center on property legally described as Lot 12,Block 6, Southridge Lakes,Phase C-1, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4596, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 0.819 acres. PURPOSE: Obtain approval for construction of a single-story office building. LOCATION: On the north side of Corporate Circle approximately 350' east of North Peytonville Avenue and approximately 400' north of West Southlake Boulevard(F.M. 1709). OWNER/APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial NO.NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: November 19, 1998; Approved (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated November 13, 1998, deleting all items relative to the carport(Item#13). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated November 13, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-131 SP.WPD 9C- PPI ne ,,,..„„,.., [ iik _s_i___DAt ID WM r2TR2A14 mone414414Praritetairalltro"; Ir0 III rt TIK U.- i . N '1 OIl&lgi1iA6li 6 1li#t4 41 I 11" 165 6e fl k. b ■ ■ 1 ' . :a-7.:.1mmI 1 8 nC 1 8i nQ Q n W4i4r4 t10 I1Il.4t ziesic lu k ‘ e1 r W1A h 1&LUs G/�lc 1ap �T, ralauzs ta22BEPM ,OA Iliiiiri av x t 3 3 9 MA"al immilogit*, 1.2212" 4A94 i tIL .Foy l ► ,4 Odic.� fr ,, .. Vd..• 1rlW110101111 „AA , III■■ / mAtitvptT4wielVek10_110. /-17,1 7*.4 vitly 0001ei i IRA TM Wain II 0.3' -'044 1 TDB lii la8 k raw= : Altsitig#4004: At -400•012..ii • T., . Tall ■1e ►�- .�- ��a 1iatill ' 0464 alit"Ala ,IM 1II ,::• �, ir--::..t�� ��111111� ►tvely. '.MOO*fil�� AN brio wipa : .4.• ptigkitsidon - . Ihii 4. en•eoi'ir"L 0 7R all r�t �� nil► -�-�t 0414.4110 11 w�� y� 1 ark Mirle11112 $1 Slitidaffilligh" -111kricliiiilL"a.\\ Illj a69 lc 0 0 Aral el ta,6 IS leigifiritill I AIM.. ,� NMI MillOMIrm ..somliftr 4/ Wit:1r ,A TR afi OS . P �* pia t. Worn s;arl a eC Ill - IOW111111141 linanig.:7: - •• it& ,,:dvia.. ...„.... III 1111111111111111M illirP S going , SIPA WED ,sue ac t c�Q�ptiL o 'Q���, • 1�'►'4 �'.��4�!s vim 11 S' To '0.4RE ' ."1,,co S R.PA I., "►Or►ic�n'��, 0. #4, 0,4 A L ";SURVEY • �,WIIIII/M SURVEY ��a���,•� �t �. i�Q:alia��> " 22 k n 2113 IIMPL.P611 1 41M*1140/44••••All alp‘WP 8 2D1• 4 �p r Ac r ,`.atii .' 1000 �'.•. Y(. �C.fikY• ' ,.,. 111111.111111 ' . hill iii' TR 2A1 TR 2A5 WAMILiii" juipltrAilleawb, -‘-. *-,. 'r 44 Vitiii. 111 I I I WI litti"Vil la• /1P1°* Nint'4 _4a,,��R0. ��zs o� 1■ram■mil �ts��w�t elli I Ill IINPrik7fir 1.111141.11 - IfrAV 1. • yK411tM .; • , 111111r GE' ■.fijitl74 14 4li. tam eC ...,6 =� \M "L►.�e /lit �� ::Gar eit O, , TRACT MAP "'le1�PIAVt..tuk, ,�� ;.•�S' " s 6C4 iliernillimilLi.,,- .�i.._ Z na II TR 2� DEL A 1B • xi pprirug3 W 54 25 13 12 8 t 35 z IIMI o um a s 14 R I _ mo q .9 ♦, a 10 Will1111110 8 24 14GREGG of 2 34 a CT 5 '4 y,w g 15 iii Ho R 52 SO 33 46 16s 3 w ha aHo a� 173 3248511394 ‘IIIIIIII8 �s 4 s = � ,es $- r .. W ,�0 ,p %� ,H 00). 21• 1 I 5 ' a 31 49s 50 20a `� 810 Ig 11 �r�,�� ' ; . z �a� rl,40 _ bs 116 s RION w 12 - w S, ill I D F. 30 CT • a r IZ 36 s+ o i w z �7 g a 4 'P 2 a # 6 13 ,'� b40 , • 141 m m 117 ,e „o 100 ,a 22 b SAN JACIN` 8 I FOUR PEAKS FOUR PEAKS ea DEV. INC. $ 21 , 3 DEV. INC. FOUR PEAKS # s 9 20 �G ,9 1F t,(Q-I r-- DEV. INC. V „0 r 11" F 10 r 0 6 ,, ,� we ,2. 40 ,) 2 10 FOUR PEAKS w i120 n_3n a FOUR PEAKS 4TR 1D5 8 11 8 l� x wDEV. INC. °u. DEV. INC. 5.165„o I 12 s 5 ,S7 "C-3 ' 2 6 ,�s 5 i SOUTF5IDGE LAI��'S ,00 _ _ F . M . 1709 TR "° 3E TR 3G .915 CO 1264 ITF .0' e TR 3 h 1.797 AC 1 s i 1. a TR 3C s 1.31 AC 3C1 I - -- -._ __ _ _. _ . 9 AC I ADJACENT OWNERS I R w� p� TR 3C2 o I AND ZONING 1.O AC I .m r1 I rN — TR -�rle s 1 , IC 3 f r 1 O City of Southlake, Texas • SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 98-131 Review No: One Date of Review: 11/13/98 Project Name: Site Plan - SouthRidge Center,Being Lot 12,Block 6, Southridge Lakes Phase C-1 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Four Peaks Development Burson and Williams Architects 726 Commerce St. #109 3838 Oak Lawn Ave. STE 1500 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75219 Phone : (817) 329-6996 Phone : (214) 520-2221 Fax : (817) 481-4704 David McMahan Fax : (214) 528-6820 Attn: Robert Richie CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 880. 1. Provide the name and address of the owner on the plan. (Phone and fax numbers are optional.) • 2. Label Corporate Drive as "R.O.W." • 3. Confirm the intended name of the project. (SouthRidge Executive or SouthRidge Center)Ensure the project name satisfies requirements as per Emergency Services standard nomenclature needs. • 4. Provide bufferyards, interior landscape areas and plantings in accordance with the attached chart. Correct the Bufferyard-Summary Chart as indicated. 5. A minimum 8' screening device and a minimum 6' Type F-1 fence is required between this site and the residential property on the north. An earthen berm with some existing trees and a brick and wrought iron fence is currently in place along this boundary and within the SouthRidge Lakes subdivision. A number of the trees along the berm have died and require replacement. Label the . height of the berm and the height and type of the existing fence.Note if this existing berm/fence feature is intended to satisfy the screening requirement or if additional fencing/screening is intended. If relief is granted to allow the use of this existing feature,the applicant must provide an agreement for the maintenance of the berm,plantings and fencing as needed with the adjacent property owners. 6. Show and label all fire lanes. A fire lane must be provided so that fire apparatus is afforded access to all exterior portions of buildings within 150' on a"hose-lay" basis. As currently configured,the northeast corner of the office building and the carport have areas that are uncovered. • 7. Provide a minimum 30' inside radius and a minimum 54' outside radius for the drive entrance. It appears that the geometry proposed does not meet fire lane standards. City of Southlake, Texas 41) 8. Show the location of the existing fire hydrant near the southwest corner of the property. 9. Include the following into the Site Data Summary Chart and modify calculations as needed to correctly reflect the information required: Building/Lot Coverage First floor footprint of all structures(Including Carports) Percentage of Building/Lot Coverage Total footprint area/Net lot area Area of Open Space Interior landscaping and-bufferyards Percentage Open Space Open space/Net lot area Area of Impervious Coverage Building footprints,sidewalks,parking areas,drives,patios,dumpster pads etc. Percentage of Impervious Coverage Total impervious area/Net lot area Floor Area By Use Identify the area included in the floor area calculation and the area being excluded by use. Specifically,note mechanical/electrical rooms or other non-occupied space for which an exclusion is requested. Start Construction Month/Year Finish Construction Month/Year 10. Show and label water and sanitary sewer services for the site. 11. Provide a minimum 8' solid masonry screening for the shown trash dumpster. 12. The dumpster location proposed appears to potentially impede drainage and may increase the possibility that trash, food stuffs or other hazardous or non-hazardous materials may be deposited • into drainage ways or local streams. Relocate this dumpster or the drainage flowline to prevent such events from occurring. 13. The.following changes are required regarding the carport structure located along the east side of the property: (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete Items 13a-13e pursuant to the Applicant's'request to eliminate the carport from this site plan.) a. Relocate the carport outside of the required 15' side setback. b. Provide a pitched roof as specified-in the residential adjacency standards for any structure having a footprint of 6,000 square feet or less (Sec. 43.13b.). c. Provide masonry materials on all facades in accordance with the residential adjacency standards (Sec. 43.13a.). A minimum of 80% of walls on such facades must be of an approved masonry material. • d. Provide a minimum structure size of 2,000 square feet(Sec. 22.5f). , e. Provide a complete architectural rendering or elevation for the proposed structure. No such elevation for the east or west facade has been provided. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation along the east and west facades meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 1111 43.9.c.l.c. as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. * The north and south facades do not require articulation as the building length does not exceed three times the wall height. riC 5 City of Southlake, Texas • 14. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.l.c. on all facades of the main structure visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the building within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 11/23/98. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17"revised reduction must be provided. * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA98- 131" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. - * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. • * Protected trees cannot be removed outside of 6' from the proposed building without processing a Tree Removal Permit or without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Cuts or fills within the limits of the critical root zone of protected trees are not permitted unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator. * A letter of permission from adjacent property owners must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement. * Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire • lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * - Denotes Informational Comment att: Bufferyard Calculation Chart, Interior Landscape Summary Chart, Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Four Peaks Development VIA FAX ABOVE Burton and Williams Architects VIA FAX ABOVE • L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\REV\98\98131 SP 1.WPD 1110 SUMMARY CHART - BUFFERYARDS Southridge Center Case: 98-131 Location/ Length of Required/ Bufferyard Canopy Accent Fence/Screening Base Line Provided Length Width/Type Trees Trees Shrubs Height&Material North- Required 168' 10' - FI 5• 10 13 6'Stockade t.:::............:..:.:.:.t..,.::•.t::. ..:.:.:..:•:.:c;c•};.{•}}x++.:....:o.,.::.:•.}}::.t. .. ...........:}::::::::::•: t:.'ttr:;... ::::ri }\ir:c�:ff:}:• t...rr...:..............:.....{...�... A ..;.:.,.:•:::t...... .}r.::.::w:::t:::..:'r.•:f.;}. :...:::..,...{.':':}::.!Ai.:?.:t..:. :>:i;,:::._•>}:t{:f.}:{t.}'f.S' `?>`'c-: :::::::::::::::}i::•i/.....t..........:....: : . .i•::{.;}::i{.:•.. ......... rv::..::;•.ir:. ..,.:...:....:::::. ::•:•:{.:.:•:::.,•y.::} `..:{},:j::i.': + ::}:{i:...:i.:. ..::-. --,`SS•1>`jfi ..f:...::......:.....vvr.::w::•:::::.vv....:n,v::{.v.:t_:{':{..:::.;.:{...:..:•:....... ......... .:•.}:...f.-:v::.Qt. ...... .............. .. -...... ........... .-.... .. ....... .�\14,;{}vrkvi......................... East - Required 215'a 5' - A 2 4 • 17 ::::::::::::....:.:................... .........\:.v.. ..,•�.:.}v.,.}ME NM•fi:}):i:: :::i:::?i vtiL;$.}}:}'}::v.vv'......wn•.::. r.:.:::.:-::?ny:^} .......r._{...v.•::{.:::•?.}}:;::.}{.;;{..}. .. :.:v:•}}:•}:•}:•}}'.:::rr:::::••w{:}:v:.:::.::...:{{:1 .......:: ..v..rr.....:,+..:•....v...... .... .. S<{{.}:h}'•}}`}}r 4} .vfv...h :.v::...... P�.K.�d. .•.ay..:::.,..�I���..r::::..:}:?..:.}:v}}:• .::•:.:.�.:.,::::.::}}::::.:::}:�::•nvw.::.v:n,•::::.4•ri^:<^:?':}::::v:}}.�..�:<:>>::{«: :........:.........ram:}.t.:::..,+:....,.t.. South - Required None v. .....................................v::::::::::::.v::nv:v.........x:::::w::.x::v....:a.........::::n::v:nv::::;v:v.v.v:.v. ................:?3:,?:1}.i:::::{•::d::{•::.... .....\4++}:F..:::}i::+x\..vr..f!'?': West - Required 157' 5' - A 2 3 13 ...........:. .....a. ......::'::::.::........?:{iY'}i$i:}}G:iLr:::i}::ri::'rj::: ...;.;.•v_x• `;f {• } ............................::�:::-,.��' 1�:::::5<: J.::2:i:.�:;z{::::::>.........}..�•:}:••::.�::::�:isi� :::: S:f::�: ::::::v:�:: :'>:?::tnz� .t...... •.:.�..�"i:"::i:c#::its•`•`.:.>.:::'t';`..:::v::<�•:..,..}:�.{• *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Driveway width was deducted from the total length of the required bufferyard. Other Comments: 1. Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W.,shrubs obtaining a mature height of three (3') or greater must be planted at a maximum spacing of thirty inches (30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive area. 2. A minimum of 50% of all canopy trees planted on the site shall be 2" in caliper and 50% must 4" in caliper.This includes bufferyards as well as interior. • SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Landscape % of Area in Canopy Accent Ground Cover Area Front or Side Trees Trees Shrubs (Sq. Ft.) • Required: 2,314a,b 75% 4 7 39 231 "`:ii?.i:::::}:{:i::ii;:ii'}ii'•ry;::::'::ii:::ii:}}_;::%i'i':ii'.v,:iiiiiij:}}:}i::i$}y'i?Y$'}:j� i:�:��i}+?�{::�:�':�':•.�:?�.i:::i':iii jii?`:ii.�.�.}vjS:::•Ti• S:tj�i:}iii 'r':i?iiv:?:?:i:::::ii.:•::•:::•w:::•:•::•::}v.::::fF.x..- 1111,11.111. 11.1111111.1116.{h:•}:::{:.}}}:^}.}: ?:i:yi:{_}ki':i}Q:ji.i:: p�.}}}':::::.}i{:ii;}}:.}'i::v}} ::::{:::r.::::::::::v::•::..E•.4���::••:::i:.}';::':::.}:.;>}:;�:::��:/k3:2::::•?::>.::z:v,;::»;;:•>:+i+•}?�:•:s:•':::rr::z::??::_::r:#:r:>;:«•`:1t�.'.;t :#'E:�:?i�?:?'� >�z::>>3�%::<>3z:>:Iw3i3!»:?•:::::.•::r • *Note any credits used in calculations: a. 10% enhanced pavement credit was provided. b. 10% credit was provided for maintaining the R.O.W. . Other Comments: 1. A minimum of 50% of all canopy trees planted on the site shall be 2" in caliper and 50% must 4" in caliper.This includes bufferyards as well as interior. • BUILDING INSPECTIONS • L:trees/dre98/98-131 rlil-rl - Articulation Evaluation No.! Case No.ZA 98-131 Date of Evaluation: 11/13/98 evations for SouthRidge Center eceived: 10/26/98 Rear-facing: North Wall ht.= . 11 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 33 14 -58% Yes 33 33 0% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Min. artic. length 1 3 200% Yes 2 9 350% Yes - Front-facing South Wall ht. = 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation • Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 30 10 -67% Yes 30 21 -30% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 • 3 50% Yes 2 2 0% Yes Min. artic. length 2 3 50% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Left-facing: West Wall ht.= 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation • Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 30 13 -57% Yes 30 38 27% No Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 3 50% Yes in. artic. length 1 3 200% Yes 5 9 80% Yes Right-facing: East Wall ht.= 10 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 30 14 -53% Yes 30 35 17% No Min. artic. offset 2 4 100% Yes 2 2 0% Yes Min. artic. length 1 4 300% Yes 5 9 80% Yes Elevations for SouthRidge Center-CARPORT Received: 10/26/98 Front-facing: West Wall ht.= 7 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 21 57 171% No 21 57 171% No Min. artic. offset 1 0 -100% No 1 0 -100% No Min. artic. length Unknown 0 ERR Yes Unknown 0 ERR Yes Right-facing: East Wall ht. = 7 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? ax.wall length 21 57 171% No 21 57 171% No fin. artic. offset 1 0 -100% No 1 0 -100% No in. artic. length Unknown 0 ERR Yes Unknown 0 ERR Yes 1 . • TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case No: ZA 98-131 Date of Review: 11 - 5 - 98 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Southridge Executive,Lot 4R3R3 (Site Plan) APPLICANT: ENGINEERS/PLANNERS: Southridge Center L. P. Burson and Willams Architects Inc. 3838 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 1500 3838 Oak Lawn, Suite 1505 Dallas,TX 75219 Dallas,TX 75219 ' Phone: Phone: (214) 520-2221 Fax: Fax: . THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT(817)481-5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: • 1. The only existing trees on the site are Eldarica Pine providing a screen along the North property line. These trees will not be effected by the construction of the development. • - BUILDING INSPECTIONS L:trees/dre98/98-131 • • • 0 • a�SITE DATA • me U•i! .._..r.. :,.SIMLM- .erg .r.r•us..n. s.v A .4 I • • A.wr...e.' ..m • 0 —�W Id.F•d MEOWPP.G TOM.-fPY m.F lmi1 1w.c.a rot. von rrnn rmu, rrn ...n .MO ow.• MOM.n row ...ra+t N.. tom. on..+q .r....du w.0-... 1 .r..a m w--u On..Pa�,-s. ar.a mr wr-u =nue.Pa m.ra a— l—Z c� F c� �:;. •m• r II .rC I svuwwr CHART-MITER rums P 1 (cam — - —— - j{ �n•.:t'ti'.•r:•:•y:{::3'v::,i�hh:i�V.%'i: l`Y.�lh}:S Ni'J.;+ .�74`� —�,• • �� \?:;.^•.,.•;2fi r:•g,..�.::}gti:£;j t:`w::icy.,,,,, :x:.„...,:,.:<%:;f•�� • 6. -._,_.,../ o. r 4'•:t :•.j': T.'jS?i j{ . :i .:f.:A..u. / m MMO Ma MO 5... ea MONOw r w. ......ti rl u.uv...wrr_w \ I ii '?- ; t ! ... ,q,,j r .am.Ts ui.O�srO.. •• • 33 :{. Jn -.Si;;.�}.•...,}'%:•:.�i y:!jS:: Yii ti>i� ::i,:{:;:;�;.r ii MO i«4 w�Ti�i �i:7lri{ti�$':'S}>/Fi'-1':•'tiwviw:+::,v :,::'i' Lam:::hiii} {..:n.. .• .:' tii r • J y�.< �s h ,/�" /, t •./ ''� } SUMMARY MART-wmaon LANDSCAPE ..1 al 1...•••••ar.01.• .......,....r.. •tip iiF In ...d.r... ....m._... iA 14. .s k um __® LOCATION MAP I 1 () it!. S ___ ,v': I ow groom ray ��Y. ?_ +I _l..l tit_ •r�� //\'il_'' .,. c� 1i!1I il 111 .7) r A__ .Zi}:: •e`✓yn.. \:4h`:C"C4:�[-.,..•✓::Y.}�v?'/,�•:;{ y,J�}i•:. '` Y:'t. la:' rW. •wm v .s..w Far 1 7 ti:. ,.\'''S q \,{ \` ! .- -- - ' _- - .��� ��t;'u�w..+::'Si:S ooi�•r3. 'E.Gh. .�. a x; r' A:.o �..:.\ `4 - `^i .y OFFICE COMMERCIAL 4.4 1 ECRPORATE ORME(37.7'FAST OF PETTONMLLE AVE.) N Lamoz..... � .. /�1..w.. --r-- p1a1.l.S.M..CM. \ ..- ' be 1 SITE PLAN 4 : =..... Y ' _...... 'GIs•131 EPo .. . . .. LT Y.S11.0µ I.•WM/M.%Oa 0: O . •. 1 Euv. 2153a • F;FGT0 ,1 26 1998 0 . . IM A • •• 1 v1 non'VI' ■■■■ u■■ ` •■i •t a 'm_3■�x e... •a i 1 F ■■■■• ■■■■ ■■■ ■■■■ :f.�_ E� • _ ' 0 cA)WEST ELEVATION � ,-—_- • '= ___ ' -- . ■■■■ _■■■ = :1" Ei:t■■al-7Z_ • ®.ate • EAST ELEVATION 3 S n cc 1 In m. No Man 0 mi r „.. 4 ..1— :: 7.32. --•—=''EL.-i■■■■ Y tt■■ - ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■ • ▪ Imamem F T..' § r NOFTH ELEVATION •� '� .< ,., cl1 Si g s\,,..,,-/..,. eT-,".' •. . . ' I Pi CO MM.Min ma Ma MO "��� ... . - / tt.,.p.C, 23 oc,aa Ira am ^'Y - y a ■■■i ram- J'•7 "a' ,,,a„7 / oini .... ' ; �.�_ . *000 i��`...",..ri - .0 = =..,.o 4^E:.i a■■- ■■t■ ■. '-■ ■■■■ .� _, —_,-----,..OM•• --••••=,-,,, •.... :: =• .—r—NM NW r-..- . =3 M I! i '4. -4 Vic,:_ .. •. ' #:. - 1` ":le,I`4 ,.r.e. p ...: 1 V.`.. `T ' ,, qS' -), A 01 SOUTH ELEVATION �P2 o.a. _. ..,. . . *I ! • FECD O C 2 0 1998 • VIIPFr City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT November 25, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-134 PROJECT: Site Plan/Tom Thumb Center and Eckerd's STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Site Plan for Tom Thumb Center on property legally described as Lot 3, and a portion of Lots 2 and 4, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and a 1.174 acre portion of Tract 1C2 situated in the L.B.G. Hall Survey,Abstract No. 686, and a Site Plan for Eckerd's on property legally described as Lots 5 and 6, Block 6, Diamond Circle Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-181,Page 69,Plat Records,Tarrant County,Texas, and being approximately 9.386 total acres. PURPOSE: Obtain approval for the redevelopment of an existing shopping • center and for new construction of a retail building on northeast corner of White Chapel Boulevard and F.M. 1709. LOCATION: The Tom Thumb Center property is generally located on the northwest corner of the intersection of North White Chapel Boulevard and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) and the Eckerd's property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North White Chapel Boulevard and East Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). OWNERS: EPIPD-Southlake No. 1,L.P. (Eckerd's site) and EPIPD-Crossroads Square, L.P. (Tom Thumb Center) • APPLICANTS: Bury & Pittman-DFW, Inc. (Tom Thumb Center) and Michael F. Twichell, Inc. (Eckerd's site) CURRENT ZONING: "CS" Community Service District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses excluding the following uses: frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping; bowling alleys; conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses; lodges, sororities and/or fraternities; medical care facilities to City of Southlake, Texas • 11 include nursing and care homes,hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors;mortuaries,funeral homes and undertakers;skating rinks, ice and roller (indoor only); and taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments under which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480. LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial (Tom Thumb Center) and Office Commercial (Eckerd's site) NO. NOTICES SENT: Thirteen(13) RESPONSES: One (1) response was received within the 200' notification area: • Robert Harvey Jr., 901'Emerald Blvd., Southlake, TX, opposed. "Several reasons opposed." See attached letter. (Received November 13, 1998). P&Z ACTION: November 19, 1998; Approved (5-2) subject to Site Plan Review . Summary No. 1, dated November 13, 1998, deleting Item #3.a (parking and pavements within bufferyards) in its entirety; modifying Item#4.b to reflect a corrected landscape parking island area of 13 s.f.; accepting on Item#4c the applicant's commitment to plant the required plantings on 1 or both sites; deleting Items #6.d.1,2,3, 4, and 5; deleting Items #6.d.6 and# 6.d.7 to be worked out with Dr. Wright; accepting Item#6.f.1 as shown; reconfiguring the driveway at Eckerd's for Item #6.f.2; on Item #7 stating the applicant will work with Dr. Montoya and Randall Boyd regarding fencing and lighting;deleting the screening wall requirement in Item #9.c but requiring more trees to be placed in the "Do Not Develop" area on the Tom Thumb site; deleting Items#11.a, b and c (parking) but requiring the developer to remove the City-owned transformer in the northwest corner and requiring the developer to work with the Park Board regarding the parking issues; accepting Item#14.a(50' front building setback) as shown; deleting Item#16 (maximum 35' building height); on Item#19 accepting the applicant's commitment to add parapets to substantially cover all mechanical equipment; and accepting Item #25 as shown but also accepting the applicant's commitment to provide the additional bufferyard landscape enhancements to receive the additional 5%impervious coverage;and accepting the applicant's commitment to maintain the landscaping indefinitely. `1D•2 City of Southlake, Texas • STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated November 13, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-134SP.WPD • • `1D-3 PPV .4_ The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of SouthlakeRalikignVI Z inag , issioq 667 North Carroll Avenue,Southlake,Texas,76092. . 0 REFERENCE NO.: ZA 98-134 I am (in favor of) ...osed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: . SIGNATURE: 12/..,d (Please Print Name) _Q,_-J Harvey,Robert Jr Etux Suzanne �� 901 Emerald Blvd ADDRESS: gad - Southlakc Tx 73e92 — --- ---- PHONE: 81? f gAN-D .79• /d� t'Vh'Ig,fri-ePe.6,b/1 , — e 4.9 • dleti5 etfeill-/ _ . .7eZ7--e-e-zez a, ie2.1 /.2 . / f r -1.404-- , .e.--,tel,,,.., . .../.._ .. Adee.41-"Za-daWeedt_ - e.4e-. ..,e,;_ i_e_.) -,711 , ,e;fr__ --- 9-2 •-*--2.41.e_. 69 .Z ,i,e..1-eg-4&- .,..,47.• e_j4aj:4, 0 do-#74- // e.te. .e_ „;h_e_e,/eit ill ..?e-e74' ,./.., ... ..L. 7-47 'i`-��+f L/ �� - e- ��.�72/ w7Tigtft-i,‘.��'/'K/G. 7D-4 Pr' - 111111111 S TR 1E 7.31 AC 5R t EMERALD CITY OF I BLyD CITY OF SOUTHLAKE R. HARVEY SOUTHLAKE I TR 1C2 "CS" I t 6.0 AC R 2R I D. MULLMAN CI �� D TE15 IAA , �A 9 CROSSROADS11 L D. • SQUARE LTD. C Q C. COONS 8 „SP_2' J7N° pN USF- i A 7 WYNDHAM j" I �� _ R. BOYD dii)z d0 � ESTMENT a \61 _ 2 ' R. MONTOY. PROP. INC. C. GARRETT 7.57 0 "SP_2" /„....... 310 5A Ji. "' FIRS? FIRST CROSSROADS 6A IIII .7l1 ® s _ GCSW LTD. A 71 ;1 AMERICANta 3 �/� SQUARE LTD. 1 „ 11 SAVINGS - BANC R "� n , STATE OF T,� I STATE OF TEXAS ° W. HALL t ` 6 R 7 SURVEY ''_ l� v A—bfi/ 9' ,a � BLS r-- - - - �- -- -- M sr-- SOUTHIj , G. LECHLER S STATE OF TEXAS. W ..._ 0 A-20- - — — __ __ __ __ — g "0-1 " 0 IJ if A..-- ERt 1a. 'Net T G. LECHLER s EME 1 I TR 5G1 TR.3C .79 AC 13 1 Ac 8 - n- ,a0 g ADJACENT OWNERS . A ND Zarill.91 ,. T I TR 3M )/13.0 �TI1°D1 1 .\ --r'_ I TR 5G 1 O0 i CITY a.11r,.... un.lat•Y. ) P n-s..t / _�. MY LW WI. r J 11.11 ht-f+FFITT IV -�v�RIM, I rim-oral ral i.1 �o 1 i •rw • \ M < < ram "'LAN •alFl.ilil Rt404 ' w` af.1 / I t 11 a mum o..soR.lr ` li 1aYl�al mar i rm '. �I� A MTV 1'� i Is a s 1°111' ♦ 0s _ a ,k, RIM Lal ! 'M�•R ' 400 ,i ii WWI Alt 0- NM•IIMW arw Plea �i % a 1 A• A rillajai:1: 4 i I ' v _ liml a. ll I • vs 4 II. id C j 4 4 II i 1 1.*U. r , J d� 4j 4 ROM 1104111•7•0111100 Imo•1 asma w7 WA 4 4iA rp p ..AO1 na:M .., j Nt..n.IIMII 11 41r. 400.0y11. 00". II a • A.„.. • '/' a ■■ le■ n <,P 4a•• �At OWNCRtI �7iYt �GSTTA A. •OOONT�/O taI G r 4001 PAIR WAY OT. \ m E II�tRt17Aw ARLIN OTON. TX 7t et .1101 6�P8�aC1Is OLa�.A '0 yy� _ • t .:IM t-�YS77Y81. U•o.. a (aim) Eir ;•IMP POOL TRYOT d IN 0 Ira.M► :,• � IL Ja1!•Ia P.O. t.aa a _ I 0 ILO Mar V 01 • L6ra IM• 1YYf' DALLAt. TCXAt 70a4t .1�1+ ' 0CKLOPCRI1100,d010' PM" PNOPOwrIso. •10. Oa �� Ot06 LINDCRO aai ROAD �,>♦L .- WA WINO VILLAsuns E. "1"h •IIIII111111411 I I I I I 6- illR•AI4 �QPI 11•y WCt TLAKC VILLAGE. OJ.LIPORNIA Ir 111 WOOD t/ CN GIN CCM .JAL _ — /6YL OPDO4.� UVO.T00. 1' 'I+ " ` I. . ..... . �__ - —...are. aM. dR ® O 'p ® R/ ` RFVISFD CONCEPT Pi AN 11 :. (�� ipppr City of Southlake,Texas 4111 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA 98-134 Review No: One Date of Review: 11/13/98 Project Name: Site Plan -Tom Thumb Center and Eckard's ,being Lot 3 and a portion of Lots 2 and 4. L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition and a 1.174 acre tract in the L.B.G. Hall Survey Abstract No. 686 and being . all of Lots 5 and 6. Block 6. Diamond Circle Estates, in all being 9.386 acres APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Ewing North American Properties Twichell Architecture 14990 Landmark Boulevard STE 300 3624 Oak Lawn Ave. STE 3200 Dallas, TX 75240 Dallas, TX 75219 Phone : (972) 866-9555 Phone : (214) 521-3066 Fax : (972) 866-9888 Attn: John Maggiore Fax : (214) 599-0583 Attn: Terry Clark CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT (817) 481-5581, EXT. 880. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to the graphic and general information shown on the plan: • a. Label the title as "Revised Site Plan". b. Change "White Chapel Road" to "N. White Chapel Blvd". c.. Label each building and driveway with a unique number or letter designation for ease of identification. (Drive A, Drive B, Bldg. A,Bldg. B ... etc.) d. Label the dimensions and number of stories of the proposed and existing buildings on the graphic. e. Label all entrances and exits to buildings. • f. Show the existing drive connection to Lot 1, Block 2,First American Savings Bank Addn. g. Label the metes and bounds on the property boundary in accordance with the property description included in the Exchange Contract between Crossroads Square Ltd. and The City of Southlake for this development. Show and label lot lines and the lot numbers in accordance with the plat revision and amended plat currently in process for this site. (City Case No. 98- 135 & 98-124) 411 h. Label and dimension adjacent travel roadway widths noting the type of pavement. 7Z'g City of Southlake, Texas .2. The following changes are needed with regard to properties within 200' of this site to include those properties across an adjacent R.O.W.: a. Label the Lot and Block designations for the residential lots within Diamond Circle Estates Second Installment. b. Label the property directly east of the proposed Eckard's drug store as "Lot 1 W.W. Hall No. 687 Addition". c. Label the owner's name and the deed record for the unplatted properties south of this development and across F.M. 1709. d. Label the zoning and land use designation(L.U.D.) of all properties shown on this plan. 3. The following changes are needed with regard to bufferyards. Provide bufferyards and plantings in accordance with the attached bufferyard calculation chart. Include the bufferyard chart on the plan: a. Parking and pavements are not permitted within bufferyards. The plan shows the following encroachments: (P&Z Action: 11/19/98 Delete Item 3a entirely) 1) Eight existing parking spaces'adjacent to FM 1709 extend 10' ± into the 20' Type 0 Bufferyard. 111 2) Existing Fire Lane along the west line of Lot 2R1 adjacent to Lot 1 and 2, Block 2 First American Savings Bank Addition encroaches into the required 5' Type 'A' Bufferyard. 3) Proposed parking along the west property line and proposed Fire Lane along the north property line of proposed Lot 2R1 adjacent to Bicentennial Park encroaches into the required 10' Type `B' bufferyard. b. Confirm the size,type and location of existing trees that are to be relocated if any and note the areas where these trees will be relocated to. Contact the Landscape Administrator for assistance in tree preservation and relocation. c. Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrubs obtaining a mature height of three feet (3') or greater must be planted at a maximum spacing of thirty inches(30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. This may require additional shrubs over and above those required within the adjacent bufferyard. 4. The following changes are needed with regard to Interior Landscape Areas: a. Show the location of all interior landscape areas to be provided on the graphic. (use shading or cross hatch to distinguish) Provide interior landscaping and plantings in accordance with the attached interior landscape chart. Provide separate Interior Landscape and Bufferyard Summary Charts specifying plantings and credits applicable to each. Iry . City of Southlake, Texas 1111 b. Provide a total of 13 square feet of landscape parking islands/parking stall in each row of parking. This parking landscaping is credited toward the total required interior landscape area. See Landscape Ordinance No. 544 for interior landscape requirements and Ordinance 480, Corridor Overlay Zone, Section 43.9.c.3. c. If the space available on a lot is insufficient for the required plantings, relocate these plantings into either the proposed Lot 2R1(Tom Thumb) or into the proposed Lot 5R. (Eckard's) as applicable. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Add Item 4c.) 5. Provide an 8' wide meandering concrete sidewalk along the east side of the proposed Lot 2R1 in accordance with the Trail System Master Plan. 6. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways ingressing and egressing the site according to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634: a. Dimension the width and depth of all points of ingress/egress to the site. b. Dimension the distance between all proposed and existing driveways centerline to centerline and label the distance to the Bicentennial Park drive entrance, the First American Savings Bank drive and to the Lot 1, W.W. Hall No 687 Addn. drive entrance. • c. Dimension the distance between the centerlines of the drives within the proposed Lot 4R and the intersection of F.M. 1709 and N. White Chapel. d. Provide the minimum driveway spacings as required by the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. Specifically, address the following: 1) A minimum separation of 500' is required for all full access drives along F.M. 1709. This distance can be reduced to 250' for right-in/right-out drives. The existing easternmost drive within the proposed Lot 2R1 and along F.M.'1709 has a separation of approximately 138' from the next drive to the east. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Delete) 2) A minimum separation of 250' is required for service drives along F.M. 1709. This distance can be reduced to 150' if less then 50 vehicles per day will utilize this drive and it is a second drive ancillary to another commercial driveway within the development. The existing service drive within the proposed Lot 2R1 has a separation of approximately 123' from the next drive to the east. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete) 3) A minimum separation of 250' is required for all drives along N. White Chapel Blvd. The southernmost existing drive within the proposed Lot 2R1 has a separation of approximately 90' from the next existing drive to the south and approximately 183' from the next existing drive to the north. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete) 4) A minimum separation of 250' is required for service drives along N. White Chapel Blvd. This distance can be reduced to 150' if less then 50 vehicles per day will utilize this drive and it is a second drive ancillary to another commercial driveway within the development. The existing northernmost service drive within the proposed Lot 2R1 is approximately 203' from the next drive to the south. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Delete) 1D-�� 'PPP' _ City of Southlake, Texas • 5) A right-in/right-out drive is required for drives intersecting an arterial within 250' of the intersection with F.M. 1709. The existing southernmost drive within the proposed Lot 2R1 and the proposed drive within the proposed Lot 5R (Eckard's) are both approximately 220 feet from this intersection. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete) 6) A minimum separation of 500' is required from street intersections for drives along F.M. 1709 This distance is measured from the drive centerline to the R.O.W. line. The existing drive along F.M. 1709 and within the proposed Lot 2R1 measures approximately 338' from the intersection with N. White Chapel Blvd. The proposed drive along F.M. 1709 and within the proposed Lot 5R(Eckard's) is approximately. 156' from the intersection of N. White Chapel Blvd. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Delete pending an agreement with adjacent landowner to the east.) 7) The proposed driveway intersecting F.M. 1709 from proposed Lot 5R Block 6, Diamond Circle Estates is in the transition area of an anticipated free right turn lane. Driveway are not permitted within the transition area. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Delete pending an agreement with adjacent landowner to the east.) * The applicant should be aware that anticipated construction of a free right turn lane on southbound N. White Chapel Blvd. will affect the existing driveway approaches in that location. (southernmost driveapproach on Lot 2R1 and Lot 4R) f. Provide the minimum driveway throat depths for stacking. Address the following: 1) A minimum stacking depth of 100' is required for all drives within the proposed Lot 2R1. (Tom Thumb Site)The stacking depth of the five existing drives are as follows: (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Allow as shown.) F.M. 1709 East Drive 34' • F.M. 1709 West Service Drive 42' N. White Chapel South Drive 11' N. White Chapel Central Drive 29' N. White Chapel North Service Drive 34' 2) A minimum stacking depth of 50' is required for the two drives within the proposed Lot 5R. (Eckard's) The proposed drive on F.M. 1709 provides approximately 22' of stacking and the N. White Chapel Blvd. drive provides approximately 31' of stacking. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete pending an agreement with adjacent landowner to the east.) 11110 City of Southlake, Texas 4110 7. Note the location, type, and height of all walls,fences, and screening devices. Provide screening as required by Ord. 480, Section 39. A minimum 8' screening device and a minimum 6' Type F-1 fence is required between the proposed Lot 5R (Eckard's) and the adjacent residential property to the northeast. Note the presence of the existing wooden fence within the residential properties.Note if this existing fence is intended to satisfy the screening requirement or if additional fencing/screening is intended. If relief is granted to allow the use of this existing fence, the applicant must provide an agreement for its maintenance as needed with the adjacent property owners. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Require applicant to work with adjacent land owners for screening and lighting to be provided.) 8. The following changes are needed with regard to the Site Data Summary Charts: Site Data Summary Lot 2R1 (Tom Thumb Site) Lot 5R(Eckard's Site) Existing Zoning S-P-2 for C3 Proposed Zoning S-P-2 for C3 Land Use Designation Retail Commercial Office Commercial Area of Open Space (Bufferyards&Int.Landscape Area) (Bufferyards&Int.Landscape Area) Percentage Open Space Open Space/Net Lot Area Open Space/Net Lot Area Impervious Coverage Area Bldg footprint,parking, drives,sidewalks etc. Same %Impervious Coverage Impervious Area/Net Lot Area Same Area of Outside Storage Outside Sales and Materials Storage Outside Sales and Materials Storage Percentage of Outside Storage Outside Storage/Net Lot Area Outside Storage/Net Lot Area Start Construction Month/Year Month/Year Finish Construction Month/Year Month/Year Number of Stories• One One Maximum Bldg.Height 22'?(UBC Std.) 26'?(UBC Std.) Provided Parking 358 or as allowed with offsite parking Required Loading Spaces 3 total, 2 at 10'X 50' Provided Loading Spaces 4 total 9. The following changes are needed with regard to loading areas: a. Relocate the loading space proposed within Lot 5R so that it is a minimum distance of 50' from the adjacent residential property to the northeast. (Sec 36.7b) (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Delete pursuant to the applicant's statement that the loading area will be relocated) b. Reconfigure the masonry screening wall located at the rear of the building on the proposed Lot 5R (Eckard's) to screen views from N. White Chapel Blvd. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Delete pursuant to the applicant's statement that the loading area will be relocated) c. A minimum 10' screening wall is required to screen views of the loading docks and spaces on the rear of the Tom Thumb building from N. White Chapel Blvd. This screening wall must utilize a similar masonry material as the front facade. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Delete but requiring additional trees to be planted within the "No Disturb Area") 10. Dimension the distance between buildings and the distance from buildings to adjacent property lines. S '1M2, priPir City of Southlake, Texas i 11. The following changes are required with regard to parking: a. Provide a minimum of 510 parking spaces for the proposed Lot 2R1 (Tom Thumb Site). A maximum 10%reduction in the required parking may be requested by the applicant as a part of the approval of this Site Plan. This reduction may only be granted upon the request of the applicant in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance Section 43.9b (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Delete) b. Remove off-site parking shown along the west side of the development and within the future Bicentennial Park in accordance with the direction of the Community Services Department. Contact Ben Henry(X 824)for specific direction regarding any parking to be allowed within city property. A letter of permission from the property owner must be provided to the City prior to any off-site parking/pavement construction. A reciprocal parking agreement will be required for any off-site parking. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete and requiring the applicant to work with Parks on off-site parking.) c. Confirm the location of dumpster pads and transformers located along the west side of this development and adjacent to or within Bicentennial Park. Relocate as needed in cooperation with the Bicentennial Park development. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Require applicant to remove the city transformer.) 12. Label the type of surface material for walks, drives,parking, storage areas, etc. • 13. Show the location, orientation, type and height of anyexistingand/or intended lighting, sins and Yp g g exterior auditory. 14. The following changes are needed with regard to building setbacks: a. Show and label a 50' front building setback line along F.M. 1709 within both the Proposed Lots 2R1 (Tom thumb) and 5R.(Eckard's) (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Allow as shown.) b. Show and label a 15'side building setback line along the west of the proposed Lot 2R1 (Tom Thumb) and along the east side of the proposed Lot 5R. (Eckard's). c. Show and label a 10' rear building setback line for the north side of the proposed Lot 2R1. (Tom Thumb) d. No non-residential building may encroach in the area above a line having a slope of 4:1 from any single-family residential property line. The topography of the proposed Lot 5R(Eckard's) is such that it does not appear the proposed building will encroach upon this slope line. Provide a line of sight exhibit showing the closet point of the 4:1 slope to the building based on grade at the property line and building grade. III15. If applicable, ensure that retaining walls within public R.O.W. or within required bufferyards are terraced every 4' in height with a minimum 2' planting area between each vertical plane. 1D-13 pp City of Southlake, Texas 0 16. Provide a maximum building height of no more than 35 feet. The Tom Thumb Building appears to be approximately 53 feet in height. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete) 17. Provide a utility plan showing proposed connections to city water and sewer and any proposed drainage facilities. If applicable, show the location of all on-site facilities for liquid and solid waste or temporary storage pending disposal. 18. Label the type and height of screening devices proposed for the trash dumpsters shown. Dumpster screening must be minimum 8' masonry wall similar to primary structure. 19. All mechanical equipment(roof or ground mounted)must be screened from view with an appropriate roof system or an architectural feature which is integral to the building design. Fencing of mechanical equipment shall not be allowed as an acceptable screening method. (P&Z Action 11/19/98 Accept applicant's commitment to add parapet walls as needed.) 20. Show, label, and dimension existing and proposed easements on or adjacent to the site. A number of previously established access, utility and drainage easements run throughout the project. Indicate which easements are to be retained, which are to be removed and what new easements are to be established. 21. Show the location of all existing and proposed fire hydrants. 022. Show and label all fire lanes. A fire lane is required for the proposed Lot 5R. (Eckard's) Fire lanes must be a minimum 24'in width,capable of supporting emergency equipment and should be provided within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of the building on a "hose-lay" basis. 23. Show, and label all curb radii dimensions adjacent to fire lanes. A minimum 30'inside turn radius and a minimum 54' outside turn radius is required. • 24. Show the proposed finished grade of the site,with contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc. Include directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and label all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type and flow line elevation. Also show centerline of water courses and existing drainage easements. Note the benchmark used for the • topographical information. This should correspond to a City approved benchmark. 25. Provide impervious coverage of the sites as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The maximum allowable impervious surface area for a C-3 district is 75% and the maximum allowable impervious coverage for a C-2 district is 70%. Up to 5% additional coverage may be obtained in each of these districts through bufferyard/landscape enhancements. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Allow as shown pursuant to applicant's commitment to providing bufferyard enhancements as needed to allow a 5% increase in impervious coverage and applicant's commitment to maintain all site landscaping indefinitely.) i r 3.it PP _ City of Southlake, Texas 26. The following changes are needed with regard to building elevations: S a. Provide architectural elevations for the east or west facade of the Torn Thumb Building and the south view of the strip retail building. Provide dimensions showing building height,wall height,wall lengths and dimensions of horizontal and vertical articulation. Label the type of exterior construction material. - b. Note the beginning of the new retail construction on the west elevation of the strip retail building within the proposed Lot 2R1. c. Provide masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.a. Confirm with the Building Official on the acceptability of the "plastic cornice" and the"synthetic stucco" material shown on the buildings within the proposed Lot 2R1. d. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c. on all facades visible from a Corridor R.O.W. and/or any portion of the building within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. * This review is based on the "C-3"General Commercial District for the proposed Lot 2R1 and 2R2 and the "C-2" Local Commercial District for the Proposed Lot 5R. (Eckard's) •* The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 11/23/98. If not received by that time,no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Although not required by ordinance,staff would appreciate placing the City case number"ZA98-134" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans,must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Protected trees cannot be removed outside of 6' from the proposed building without processing a Tree Removal Permit or without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Cuts or fills within the limits of the critical root zone of protected trees are not permitted unless adequate construction methods are approved by the Landscape Administrator. S* A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) must be obtained prior to issuance of a P P building permit for the construction of the off-site pavement. lb'15 City of Southlake, Texas ill* Please be aware that any change of tenant/owners with a request for a new C.O.will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. * Denotes Informational Comment att: Bufferyard Calculation Chart, Interior Landscape Summary Chart, Articulation Evaluation Chart cc: Ewing North American Properties VIA FAX ABOVE Twichell Architecture VIA FAX ABOVE Bury & Pittman VIA FAX: (972) 991-0011 Attn: Brett Blankenship David McMahan VIA FAX (817) 481-4074 L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\RE V198\98134SP 1.WPD 1110 • • 1111 ' PP. Articulation Evaluation No.1 ite ase No.ZA 98-134 Date of Evaluation: 11/16/98 vations for Lot 2 Tom Thumb Bldg eceived: 10/26/98 Rear-facing: North Wall ht. = 30 - Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 90 145 61% No 90 152- 69% No ' Min. artic. offset 5 30 500% Yes 5 6 20% Yes Min. artic. length 21 60 186% Yes 14 46 229% Yes Front-facing South Wall ht. = 30 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? . Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 90 128 42% No 90 154 71% No Min. artic. offset 5 1 -80% No 5 6 20% Yes Min. artic. length 9 3 -67% No 6 6 0% Yes Left- facing: West Wall ht. = 30 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 90 202 124% No 90 Unknown -100% nknown Min. artic. offset 5 0 -100% No 5 Unknown -100% nknown . artic. length Unknown`in 00 ERR Yes Unknown Unknown ERR nknown lirght-facing: East Wall ht. = 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation ' Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 54 148 174% No 54 Unknown -100% nknown Min. artic. offset 3 65 2067% Yes 3 Unknown -100% nknown Min. artic. length 37 1.6 -57% No Unknown Unknown ERR nknown • 411 . • lb-1i PW , Elevations for Lot 2 Strip Retail Bldg eceived: 10/26/98 ight-facing: North Wall ht. = 18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 54 60 11% No 54 70 30% No Min. artic. offset 3 0 -100% No 3 0 -100% No Min. artic. length Unknown 0 ERR Yes 2 0 -100% No Left-facing South Wall ht. = .18 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 54 60 11% No 54 60 11% No Min. artic. offset 3 0 -100% No 3 0 -100% No Min. artic. length Unknown 3 ERR Yes Unknown 0 ERR Yes Rear-facing: West Wall ht. = 15 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 45 411 813% No 45 341 658% No Min. artic. offset 2 0 -100% No 2 3 50% Yes Min. artic. length Unknown 0 ERR Yes 85 70 -18% ,No S out-facing: East Wall ht. = 17 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 51 166 225% No 51 175 243% No Min. artic. offset 3 1 -67% No 3 2 -33% No Min. artic. length 3 10 233% Yes 6 10 67% Yes P-W Elevations for Lot 5R Eckard's Bldg ceived: 10/26/98 e 8 ear-facing: North Wall ht. = 26 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max.wall length 78 148 90% No 78 148 90% No Min. artic. offset 4 15 275% Yes 4 0 -100% No Min. artic. length 37 16 -57% No Unknown 0 ERR Yes Front-facing South Wall ht. = 26 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 78 95 22% No 78 95 22% No Min. artic. offset 4 8 100% Yes 4 5 25% Yes Min. artic. length 24 18 -25% No 7 25 257% Yes Left-facing: West Wall ht. = 26 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 78 52 -33% Yes 78 33 -58% Yes Min. attic. offset 4 2 -50% No 4 5 25% Yes Min. artic. length 9 28 211% Yes 7 25 257% Yes .ght- facing: East Wall ht. = 26 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta. Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 78 40 -49% Yes 78 46 -41% Yes Min. artic. offset 4 18 350% Yes 4 10 150% Yes Min. artic. length 6 15 150% Yes 6 16 167% Yes • 10 rib-iQ . ipi, 1111 SUMMARY CHART - BUFFERYARDS Diamond Circle Estates Lots 5 & 6 Case: 98-134 Location/ Length of Required/ Bufferyard Canopy Accent Fence/Screening Base Line Provided Length Width/Type Trees Trees Shrubs Height&Material North- Required 384' 10' - FI 12 23 31 6' - Stockade Provided 384' ' 10' - FI 11 23 31 Existing Brick East - Required 146' 5 - A 1 3 12 Provided 146' 10' - E 1 3 13 South - Required 298'' 20' - 0 12 9 42 Provided 332' 20' - O 13 10 42+3 West - Required 266'a 10' - E 3 5 21 Provided 300' 10' - E 3 6 16 Berm *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Driveway width was deducted from the total length of the required bufferyard. Other Comments: 1.Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W.,shrubs obtaining a mature height of three (3') or greater must be planted at a maximum spacing of thirty inches (30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive area. • 2.A minimum of 50% of all canopy trees planted on the site shall be 2" in caliper and 50% must 4" in caliper.This includes bufferyards as well as interior. 3.A shrub screen is proposed to be provided between the building setback line and the R.O.W. SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Landscape 96 of Area in Canopy Accent Ground Cover Area Front or Side Trees Trees Shrubs (Sq.Ft.) Required: 5,0401 75% 8 17 84 504 Provided: *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Required landscape area was reduced by 10% for landscaping of R.O.W. Other Comments: 1. Required interior landscape area equals 4,480 square feet if water conservation credits are taken. 7 - Canopy Trees. 15 - Accent Trees, 75 - Shrubs, 448 sq.ft. ground cover. Ill BUILDING INSPECTIONS L:treees/dre98/98-134 g ipp 0 SUMMARY CHART - BUFFERYARDS Diamond Circle Estates Lots 2 & 3 Case: 98-134 Location/ • Length of Required/ Bufferyard Canopy Accent Fence/Screening Base Line Provided Length Width/Type Trees Trees Shrubs Height&Material North- Required 519' 10' - B 10 16 52 Provided 520' 5' - A 5 10 42 East - 1 Required 419'a 10' - E 4 8 34 Provided 489' 10' - E 5 10 34+3 East - 1 Required 73' 5'A 1 1 6 Provided None South - 1 Required 93'a 20' - 0 4 3 13 Provided 139' 20' - O 6 4 13+3 South - 2 Required 215' 5' - A 2 4 17 Provided None West - 1 Required 690' 5' - A 7 14 55 Provided 287' 5' - A 3 6 23 West - 2 Required 99' 10' - B • 2 3 10 Provided None 0 *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Driveway width was deducted from the total length of the required bufferyard. Other Comments: 1. Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrubs obtaining a mature height of three (3') or greater must be planted at a maximum spacing of thirty inches (30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive area. 2. A minimum of 50% of all canopy trees planted on the site shall be 2".in caliper and 50% must 4" in caliper.This includes bufferyards as well as interior. 3. A shrub screen is proposed to be provided between the building setback line and the R.O.W. SUMMARY CHART - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Landscape %of Area in Canopy Accent Ground Cover Area Front or Side Trees Trees Shrubs, (Sq. Ft.) Required: 11,8281 75% 20 39 197 1,183 Provided: *Note any credits used in calculations: a. Required landscape area was reduced by 10% for landscaping of R.O.W. Other Comments: 1. Required interior landscape area equals 10,409 square feet if water conservation credits are taken. 17 - Canopy Trees, 35 - Accent Trees, 173 - Shrubs, 1,041 sq.ft. 0 ground cover BUILDING INSPECTIONS �' L:trees/drc98/98-134 10-2J Iry _ . _III TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non-Residential Development) Case No: ZA 98-134 Date of Review: 11 - 5 - 98 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Diamond Circle Estates - Second Installment(Site Plan) APPLICANT: ENGINEERS/PLANNERS: Ewing North American Properties Michael F. Twichell,Inc. 14990 Landmark Blvd. 3624 Oak Lawn aye, Suite 320 Dallas, TX 75240 Dallas, TX 75219 Phone: Phone:(214) 521-3066 Fax: Fax: (214) 599-0583 THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT(817)481-5581 EXT. 848. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: S1. The proposed relocation of the existing trees may be difficult due to their size and age. Please confirm the new location of the existing trees and how they will be relocated. 2. A protected tree shall be considered to be preserved only if a minimum of 75% of the critical root zone is maintained at undisturbed natural grade and no more than 25% of the canopy is removed due to building encroachment. The two (2) Eastern Red Cedars located along the North property line are shown to remain. Due to the construction of the new driveway more than 25% of the trees critical root zone will be disturbed. Due to this these trees may not be credited toward existing tree credits and possible mitigation may be necessary. 411 BUILDING INSPECTIONS L:trees/dre98/98-134 rlb-22 a gL I I • I 1 ig .1 �g �l 1 f�9-'Ty U zgr.a Pl cp Es 3 E 1 v.,, 1:czzza'E� i IIIIIIuuiuuui:a ,i _ , .___i .0 •- - I ti ,,it,:,,,, kA\\\.\\\ - i iri..a ,,,,,. , •„,\,, . . 'e:$,. :i:1.),0:::.: -.-,\ 4 .: 1 .-,r..! .,-0;4"-i4;4•4'.:',i-tf:'..t...'`„lid -q .0/�,.�. Th ,,,; ,,..0 :?,- ;; :ice' .• H ■o " to�.v::•Yr' ,ti °:,`� �-'+''•` T fir ulpg N , 1- .;.1,..i.:?-",..4.4:5;r:,. is-t: !..;rr % -111 •I I I I I I "8 \,'i \ \• \1tii 1 if } 1.f:• 1..-t�iNi-T— - •1. 1 't gE it iii"'FFFhhh v,} �• .11 • }.i•y'"1 1rJi �. ▪ �,,.. (n I I I s °t \\ i/ z ''‘/ ,•-.F:'F,vir:2'r_�.rrt-• '�i:•,it_I`y`r, , rigQ PA i C pp 77 . I I '.0' / / \ cs =4,..,,,,,?..:::H-.; rIqg- 0 r sa I 1 L- y fF.,. - - .....r.,..,; ......„2, -.\-71-114-14-1-1-M-c-t-• - :-,-,,,,-:-;-,..-•-•--•-. _j_. ni :��° p WHITE p .ip . A.,. CHAPEL ROAD ,I_ .�I a 1 su er mast bt 11 O _ _ — -f ! \ / \ ki t RESIDENTIAL LOT S I �" / f/// \\ I .i• �, t •,� I J rr ii i Ufa -'.i' ,1..ilc:'•',if,f'..: '/. 1 I 1, o \ ms 1%5'.11 g ::11.:.: .1...!.11:. II iii II 1 ---,-:'.. l'i - Cie M rn °fie %\ s a ;ilt -,ki . la 1 PE2 6 \• 1 .zo Elie! .[lei 'w dl 1 5 is illirillio Im§ . 11 : .1Q.. I g III ill . tilli 1 T V I • IICHICALWI RAM MS I.-.-P.TOt1.16 roa1.1•Naa saillINI 9atMiMMM a1ACa I_MAMA.. 'r x';r `s • ?4 m>"-T 4^s ,1. -vs c 1i �-dyfy t�D 13 T �.....RAM� EWING NORM AMEREAN NSW SPAM COMP iSTO Unbolt.r.r • Dim Tins 71110 • (IAAA EAST EDAM AT SCAMS PIWGNCV 03 tom ELEVATION AT R.9EPDS FH TUAACf AND TOM THUMB CENTER RENOVATICti • cm •T MAIO N1i1C WKE.L PAID ....;::...?......„....."-_,::::,:........c„,,,,,,..„...,........ n...R,n. r 7�c .a.s.. .,.n n.® � �_ hz . 80.M4. 1l,TOUs n.8'MZN2112=: L'P'Y f3S�'J1D:'' E LEVXDON9 I -fl It-- 1........ _�a_�-- ,_„. _......._ , , -a________: 11 ) ; 1 ____ ______ • ; 1 1 1 _______ ; , ; , . , _____ ____ OEMERAL MM.EOM our OZ' STELFVATDlATELI(FAtrSPHMAIAGV 01 SOUTH EIEVANONATECEWSPHA@AACY E1-0 En OCT 261998 • • III 1• 11110 NOMMIRIII MUM ppqq a x1... .o: bO."'�a�~ �ml I - .,,III IIIIIIII1111I1IIII1111IIIllllllun . Ir . =`,c� ,. vv , VI 1fP + r-+% tu.w t*�!'^'f ".-".. f y... fiti G:fcu ' ' a iy 1 ,! f nl i. f u f,. mlo non i .;.A { r� iir f f I 1 f f T• f n• .L t',.3 C 1 mow«^3. ,.t 31 d ..la.+. 1�A��� - ........4 in it ei,SI M. IOYiR.v.OL.o MICOLIA \\ QG,91ZMA Off �dNil �w °" NU"v�� ."'SEIVAJALT EI DEOCI E".• .AVM= w DILL" /ram /1� /� 1 l �_---a---n--_— llInD3CP I FOR Ae`1=`, S 1 b�6 t7___-- ---�----------_ —_—� l I 3y� I � e _ I 1 EWING d NORTH AMERICAN PROPEIDIRS 02 SOUTH EDAM AT RENOVATED EXISTING AETAL AND PROPS D UI11OB at • AND TOM THUMB CENTER. RENOVATION P I P• ; H — T..,x,arro la.x.....,,-I 'AIM cw6L MAD _ I 1 srr_: usar � l eoun• �w IMOM Mal maa.:•1 $ass 8x1O1 1:024ug Alle • = - 11=1•1AIA TFJW • ' `"-. ' ' 4.=n. r: ''. [f-F ? .L.. a�.' o 'ir- �r � "`...1t+--%?� v.. . Ik. _ .�. • . e x r r r CP / � I � tr•-ri���s e�d�r r+—, n'..� �'y3�x..Y r` is `/X�/� =sta. rMr. 0-9,--r ELEVATIONS \Li `�.� 3xN�ii -a---- a--cc , — d _ r w -- I I• C� I 11 , 1 I� I I I I 1 I 1 I l '� — ......... ""� 1 C G I ! I 1 1 i I I ' *::.. \J� I s^ H I i 1 �Zc 1� I I i ` _ • �v\A 4 GENERAL 01 EAST ELEVATIONATNBIWATED EMITS HETAL AHD MIMED PETAL OCT 2 6' 199 REM)OCT 11 • • . ! ItIli 1 MONS IMMO ?j!l ' •sRr '. •. 1..�., y- ?'y✓s• • i.-`}- • - .. puMtr��r r.r.r RV 01.11.1011 POD EWING 02 MTH MAW:NATRE TNATED EOM FETAl AIM PROM TEL1 11041 NORM AWREAN PROESIMES woo[...soot modward o Di, TWO . TOM THUMB 1"-.3 CENTER RENOVAIION ••1 rye Dore corn • i ;"'�"::. 1 ` 'any NM. ' _ pinxAlE WAS ELEVAIIONS SI". - �'11 �e�t..� �-il� i .•�iw'.'.:� .G�1DT�� i p r rs_a� '--Satz =Aie ter. HORRIflEVAIIONATAENQVAIDF7h5TNGAETAl11taPIY7P"aIDHEGi —� Oi wEsrflFVA1gNATfi@7WA1®EIOSINGAEfALAIDPAOPSEDPETAL • mia � E1-2 FED OCT 26 :98 , LZ-aL r— I �+O h 9� I N N A; V gti r rr..w. •x� 1 ,I \ II ,,,,t 14 ..,. .,.....‘ , , , ,{_,._, \,1 o ,::‘,, . 14 1 ne • o9 s ..� __I: Ird Z `�•r e.nV+..f iar rut t - j —i-7 It` Ll 1 0 itc. i -!i-ii " \-\ c:. og si' ' ;;&44 • ._ , . 0- , 1 rd.it..'„, s :Rig till ) % IgOA 1 I � � .. III=4 '!\` � , `� 14� --I zai 11 Ei , , : 9 I l• i 4/40P ,:..• I ?,g A • s0 ...4 1 1 1 a \ 1-1,., \ . , 0 --' - ,/ ...V ' I ,' t s ....�.. ° - Qua u Ii li 1 eo � ; LL_ _ t� 11 1;. Il 1• 11' Il i--� IIE gco o . ), C =sr . WHITE CHAPEL ROAD . 1` - u. • 'a r w $' V% /ool1/.. y 1 Q ;q ; xEsoomK for �r 1 d 4 t ta r--I— V. c �Il, a I '1i 011!lriiiill 1f 1 3 • � =.f it, ,i/ wvg . all 1'1_.4 •ill g [ fob '. y l' 'ic\ 6 "g FEDi1• 11 I. �LI �i ii s . ..... ,,,, ,i; 0 # , ,i ii . _ ,_ ...._,, ........— I. 1,47,,, r:1 [ P." '' ' ,....1 i k,-.. ik p. 1 19 ei le(Juk I ill-•9 11 poli : :i: 11 . iiii xs 1g • I, 11 !!I' :::: �l 1 Val t Ft I I iillii IIIIIIIIIIIi 5 I I I I I I I I I MII l o '1 k, 1 n i il ROI 8 1§ 11R- 1 0 Bari 9 13 let d City of Southlake, Texas STAFF REPORT November 25, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-133 PROJECT: First Reading/Ordinance No. 480-293 / Rezoning-Tract 1C2,L.B.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686 STAFF CONTACT: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator, 481-5581, ext. 743 REQUESTED ACTION: Zoning Change on property legally described as being a portion of Tract 1C2 situated in the L.B.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 1.174 acres. PURPOSE: Extend existing "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan Zoning within the Crossroads Square Shopping Center north to accommodate redevelopment of the shopping center. LOCATION: On the west side of North White Chapel Boulevard being approximately 700'north of West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). OWNER: EPIPD-Crossroads Square, L.P. APPLICANT: Bury&Pittman- DFW, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "CS" Community Service District REQUESTED ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with. "C-3" General Commercial District uses excluding the following uses: frozen food lockers for individual or family use, not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping; bowling alleys; conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses; lodges, sororities and/or fraternities;medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes, hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors; mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers; skating rinks, ice and roller (indoor only); and taverns, clubs and other comparable establishments under which the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480. • LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial City of Southlake,Texas NO.NOTICES SENT: Five (5) RESPONSES: One (1)response was received within the 200' notification area: • Robert Harvey Jr., 901 Emerald blvd, Southlake, TX, opposed. "Environment: destruction of trees/bushes/wildlife. Homeowner increased cost:will have to plant 7-10 trees at 15' high to makeup for loss of tree cover- $3,000-$5,000. Quality of life:Lessened-increased traffic noise and risk. Increase noise trash and lighting. Insurance-increased risk of theft/damage." (Received November 13, 1998). P&Z ACTION: November 19, 1998; Approved (7-0) accepting the applicant's acknowledgment to deed restrict both tracts to exclude movie theaters. STAFF COMMENTS: Refer to Case No.98-134 for Site Plan Review Summary No. 1,dated November 13, 1998. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-133Z.WPD • �, , •v 6?5 AC TR CCTR n i . mg tic TR 411 TR _.agargilifti MO. !El Ii!tiTi Ellit 12 i TR Id 9ffi4RIC m a Se �, c3 G 1 IV:-'a TR 1s 410 ll 17E do to: n em r . TR u TREmu r7'=r i�,,,.imm_le� _ 1Q64 AC 3556 AC r�•.s....�.. 16605 AC1TR , pool ELVAI M345 AC 23.4 Ac PQ0 5Q0 AC t�111111-_0�� c�Foctiti�� c AIl�1�� ���ITR RD e T �i�n; `a do 1 ...... .......,_ •itti roil v 410kihitios . ; iimAN - ...... . TR 9F \ "..$' t% 16 mum rin, Ammi mon ,.. .. 1,40 nv ingiimimumma roe _--_-- =Iwo,,,,,\ wit ■. ainiti ■ e i .►l i11* — 142 k gy-fir=iirlissei writ Mini" ,g■■■I�i i�! , ',ovine ,, TR2 iIiI!r!ki_ ♦95 do , .`i 1R 3A ♦ 1► ,itaa Al AA • 21 c lig TR 311 ■ II/ .1C ���' s4 TR 11 TR SD1A TR 1C2 a n ■ ' ■ •' 3! (AI a�AC A00• 1DBo AC u1 do i ■ • ,r•� \ am WAIF: „ ir►i it y1 5.7dAC TR TR �� ; • ��miyani -� 1� • �: m a -. *wilt— ■•IMF // l ..„,...... _.„,:• • TR� .If :3-"'�I,,'itrigivirgil►;..,:� �►� 1 Acor.,,,-/ E magi IL. inwompaswittimy821 AC 1 Cd� 95 z.___1...) ee BTU AC 59i6 A�TR 5F TR 5E i AC L.� �tia 4111 �� �� ,'.46 METHIIMST U. _� �1,�ed � , _l�m � t3R54 AC TR 31r2 � ; 5H ' �'4f TR ,NA %Mr,;'�' illifi ii tr■,■:r- TR 0' MI }!� TR zas 0 T42 R a �■uimr-•;010 A, 4111 macaw Miiire-^irlrisgrA. - ellw,am rim I■ "1" . ■ ■► 423 Ac .wiejLtaim.IMMUNIP" .•itit„.;,/.. !�a Ae III 111111, you sti . lin AO* 4 6'i: lian NIB $ i' i ' - I. isr as • TR 2B2 nt TR 2CZA• �� ll !. . pit* 'r�1�1w • Ili/weir* � *** .i■ us kAIM I II ME .:Mil ssing ar*.- 1;eiig'iff *--aiummung "2 "" 111"."-Ara al* fetto ‘.1T-in- me .�► ��'����t�►�111� ion I._ ... . .000-. ,: - 0. 14- ii Ste aid lairdilialincil TR 5c 1%,",,, Phvejliall akillitaA iniallig 4:1,"1,1,,, ai -rve4w -.-- la,ON ON I•11 ra 51) 4.0 AC '"s'-' Wit '''':Ail 11111111 rinell*timnpoir au Nail • • ,201#100. MO Mt TR/3i CT MAP ligeslifirii: -../stutregti ' iiiiiimi. 0 �� •r 11►- -MVP 8 - TR m : �iii %� flhiaiiT1 ``' ' 47))11111 • , TRH lj.t� - ,- : J - . _ . . __________ - 11 10 9 l 10 3 1B 17 ,_.).8 15 14 13 12 11 • SAN SABA DR TR 1 1 2 3 10.0 AC I TR 1E + 1R 2R 3R 7.31 AC 4 EMERALD CITY OF -R: HARVEY CITY OF SOUTHLAKE "CS" SOUTHLAKE „ 1R TR 1C2 , "S 1 A • 6.OAC ' D. MULLMAN C1 I V 4 ii a TE pIA TA 9 G 11A LL $ B 6 Q 6, I) NO s -C. COONS TR TB I S74 9.9 AC WYNDHAM 41 4 INVEST_MENT I CROSSROADS SQUARE LTD. i PROP: INC: 7 „SP_2„ SP-2 a,o 5 A 1 "a FIRST AVERr!aN sa 987 2 d ylNCS R4NC .722 -,' y - ADD� ,ss 4 14 .971 ®/ 1 � B a 3 } l�o 5822 J s ,,{ ,°1__ -2ZL! • �; 1 =TR 1 C4 .66 (4--.10 . ADJACENT OWNERS A - -_ - - - AND ZONING TR 178 AC --- i i A 3eJ1TR o A • •' 4111111 IDMIDCI IL;I - 41--• yl. If:.iiiii r ir:1"--:`•:cccu•Aac-r--?, r—c:^T--s-.a„Aa.t::r---■ ■•.-. .7- gip,• ■..-, I: ->— /..a i S-P-2 ZONING REQUEST 'AMR 1 f"--,--- '�'*Pl ^_R•.? ✓._.,.. TRACT TMO !•• T'•r. i•I 1111 ar a SOUINLAKE Rpm= UM V.•Isla.AM�.3 p, 1.1.0111 SA•nam.,t,',in KL1031a.PC273 for MO V.•Mae.11.fAm a ACRES D.R.T.C.T. mom Im wtllm w TAwm• TRACT ONE _ _ __ _ �•r :• rosltw♦ Or CF SOUTN.A E ... ..., ... II �. ___�. RA_ LOL.103La.P012711 a.:•-L._1�._. 1.11:.1L•1 1.._il•_ >•t11.•11:.•LL1 Ll-1 Gomm DAT.C.i _o L--- ---- W=I1.rteTALLLA7Cf6 cCL LD�laBAMLATIDe 1. t - r iE-7,.`-•i,1�:,r�1-::7:--.1 II-"7.^.1• .'_•7•.r.1•ASR::r:-.II . ' ....:/.'. I 0 1_.:�:.•._T..C)•:iJ1.acL.n:...1 •.^��.:'T.7�IFia•A 1 n e' ye 7,t:L,:. 4s.I�-_--7 �� y.. IEi41 •±-r,+m.m1111onimil1isi, i. r,ia.. ,w o.ac•.A j tt.. ""••��''�; :M1!r` 11mRI10wo w '.r-,..`1'.. y • ., • •.'t...ice:':..! ••.. . :Pr 7:*. I .-•: • .. ��f.r...t.�,•>•�ti y..� ~ .'-..•• Y I 17.07' YOWL R I1.�•11q .1•10111.1•111 Al 11 PREMouS VEST PARCEL CC LOT 2,BLDIX 1 V r ig;c.A-i..?! C.;}rl}.' ti•,▪ -:g,;; c; a1 m eE APPORIIpIm 10 CITY OF sOUTxuKE . ✓ ��:.' =• ;': :_�.y�T-`,Y.• •`� w.«.�`'� lal g, ."....1.-'-‘,..., ••L'', ....... • =i' Y:.%;. ;:;y.,•Z�✓,J.Apt:):^_„`s!'! `'. 0Z OOLTAL LOT �� �ww• -- PQti • �i L �S1�iLST 1 TF••" tA^ 1.;...•. D - a�_ �;1_.-. O • DIAYCND ORO.E ST�SSECOND Dt9TALLNENT NOR1A MQ'RI('AN A,AL,>Aal In immi 1;^.`ir,:=t 1.n ...r ytt - I e� '� zwm�1 PROPEICOIS in *As 330 `• ... 1 \ / I. t9l"ifGA�LELJ L7 - .. / in ' rc j DON • i 2 BE P - - \ / / TOM LOT 2,aLCCK 2 A TC TO V• / CENTER FIRST AMERICAN WANDS BANK AWN. O B L �' ::�� ,q,- •• RESIDENTIAL LOT PRE11L PLATWI_1C•IC •PG.late I lid _� : B.D. .sa-1 ail �. .I• :'::'.:"`' yy / RENOVATION. ZONED S-P-2ICS —, e r nu T.C. L I ��� \\ /\ n" w /PI Ta9IL!awLa�nonc I vs / I / •• i I ' m / RE9DENfALLOT t10uRaAixaLn = v 1 z I � ,,,,I_ 1 '..4, ��•�4 SOUILLAR TPJW 1 --, I II:�-- F , A}:-E ......_ w i': ME • �.I...1:. - QIG PLAN ;F yu /� \+' 1.- ..........J '� :i� 7T >>::. 1: /ADvENT 01P3S11AN CNUROI J• ' ` • WI.a19.PC100 6 _ ani I t I '_ ,., ..CT.397 •O W CCNSTRUCnON OR IMPROVER _ ��I NOT INCLUDED IN TABUUnON —� I ;�� --- LOTS 3 T. _._ ...- �' _�_ w.� LOT 1.BLCCK 2 •���µ777}f-{r- —--' • _•.:•::'.'.".'.... .. --I w i. "" —- FRST AMERICAN RANN=BANK ADM. + a -1 .N male t �� —— . CAB.A.SIDE 1323 !aeos•• mar 1)l ` _— P.ZONED S-TIC " co..u"w• 1a117 Zd1m 5-P-2 i ... 9.f1T1!• O.0IQt9i• . • w.— later / !■-:[� -- ! A.111117 &I..... _� • ' 15;H•^ 9 llama•• CA. !ant,• .9 MY30'OY• R.w.av _-- HierAL "" SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) GENERAL .�.•• .. _.._1_ __. , .mew + I.Na GC-f 2 6 1998 8P1-1 PPir, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-293 • NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN'TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF TRACT TIC2 SITUATED,IN THE L.B.—G.HALL-SURVEY,ABSTRACT_NO' A 686, AND"BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,194 ACRES,, ND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT = 'WITH :_ "C-3 GENERAL COMkIERCIAI DISTRICT USES.,EXCLUDING THE FOLLOWING-TJSES FROZEN FOOD LOCKERS FOR INDIVIDUAL ORFAMIIY USE,: NOT INCLUDING THE,.. PROCESSING •OF'FO:OD EXCEPT"CUTTING OR-WRAPPING; BOWLING ALLEYS; CONVENTIONAL GOLF. COURSES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR .DRIVING RANGES ACCESSORY THERETO; BUT .,.EXCLUDING ; OUTDOOR MINIATURE. : `GOLF COURSES; I LODGES, s SORORITIES AND7OR • FRATERNITIES; MEDICAL;.;CARE, . FACILITIES 7`TO INCLUDE NURSING "SAND CARE HOMES; HOSPITALS WITH THEIR RELATED FACILITIES AND SUPPORTIVE RETAIL'AND;PERSONAL SERVICE USES OPERATED"BY OR UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE HOSPITAL PRIMARILY FOR THE •CONVENIENCE OF PATIENTS; STAFF AND VISITORS;MORTUARIES,FUNERAL HOMES AND UNDERTAKERS;SKATING RINKS,ICE AND ROLLER (INDOOR ONLY);- AND' TAVERNS, 'CLUBS AND OTHER COMPARABLE ESTABLISHMENTS UNDER WHICHJTHE ON-PREMISES ." CONSUMPTION " :.OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES-IS PERMITTED.SUBJECT TO-ISSUANCE=OF A SPECIAL.USE PERMITAS REQUIRED;IN SECTION;45OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 480; AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC • INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND • THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE L:\CI CYDOCS\ORD\CASES1480-299.ORD Page 1 ilPir CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY • FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS 'CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map,regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a`comprehensive plan; and • WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currentlyzoned as "CS"':Cominuni_._ . P P tY _..,tY Service District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of • signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-293.ORD Page 2 0A-7 reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate rneighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air;effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, . WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a publicIII necessity ss ty for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest • clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the' rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does fmd that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there 0 is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASES\480-293.ORD Page 3 gA -S been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or • tracts of land requested-for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: ill . Being a pottionof Tract 1C2 Situated in the L.B.G.VHall Siirve ,Abstract No:686 . and"being approximately 1;:174 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "CS".;Communi Service District' to ;"S-P 2""Generalized-Site ty, - Plan District with `°C-3 Geiieral'Commercial,Disfrictuses excluding the;following uses: frozen food lockers for individual or family use,not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping; bowling alleys; conventional golf courses; including outdoor driving ranges.accessory thereto,b•ut e•xcluding outdoor.ininiature golf courses,:ho dges,.so_rories d/or fat_emities• mdia_carefaci:lities toi_clu, de nursing and Care'homes, hospitals with their related facilities and supportive.retail and personal,service uses Opetatict bfy-Of under the control tof the hospital pnmaily for the convemerice'of patients, staff and visitors, mor�tuanes, funeral hoiiies,and undertakers;-skatingi'rinks,ice and rollerA;(indoor only),and r.taVetiTs,,,clUbS-aild'o-thet comparable establishments under"which the on-premises consumption of.alcoholic bever•ages_is permitted subject,-to issuance of"a special Use permit as.required_in Section.45 m of Zong Ordinance•No 48.07as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. • L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CAS ES\480-293.ORD Page 4 IPIFir , SECTION 3. 0 That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed: SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to III avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, P P water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of 0 this ordinance. L:\CITYJ OCS1ORD\CASES\480-293.ORD Page 5 SA--(0 prir , SECTION 6. • ( • - That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all IIIviolations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or anyother ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of elany of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the L:\CITYD OCS\ORD\CASES\480-293.ORD Page 6 SA--f I official City newspaper one time within ten(10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required • by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: • CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY • L:\CITYDOCS\ORD\CASFS\480-293.ORD Page 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: • CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: • Aik LACITYDOCS\ORDTASES1480-293.ORD Page 8 EXHIBIT "A" • BEING a portion of tract in the L.B.G. HALL SURVEY,Abstract No. 686 situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,Texas,and also being a portion of a tract described in a deed to the City of Southlake,Texas of record in Volume 10346, Page 0278, of the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 3/8 inch iron rod found at the Southeast corner of a 6 acre tract described as tract number one in a deed to the City of Southlake, Texas as recorded in Volume 10346, Page 0278. of the Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas said point being, North 89 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds East 17.00 feet from a 5/8 inch iron rod found for the Northeast corner of L.B.G.HALL NO. 686 ADDITION, an Addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide#1215,Plat Records, Tarrant County,Texas. THENCE:South 89 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds West 516.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set in North line of said L.B.G. HALL No. 686 ADDITION, also being the South line of said City of Southlake tract, for a corner; THENCE: North 02 degrees 00 minutes-47 seconds West 98.83 feet departing said line to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for a corner; THENCE: North 89 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds East 519.47 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set in the East line of the above referenced City of Southlake tract, also being the West line of White Chapel Blvd, for a corner; • THENCE:South 00 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds East 98.77 feet along the East line of said tract to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 51139 square feet or 1.174 acres of land, more or less. NOTE: THE COMPANY DOES NOT REPRESENT THAT THE ACREAGE AND/OR SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECT. • • L:\C ITY DOCS\O R D\CAS ES\48Q-293.0 R D Page 9 SA-�f • • • rot 02 • ry n 1111 od R rn " �d fffipr r' s•6rJr^Trcr.A rT�ACM 5 a•1• ./inu • fn an w Of sourte wl.lat./•raaE/ IC r:.er LOWS emaec � a'l..v'.�:::b - 0o ar�v soUn11Xe �� �� WLI.tL tart/ 1 ... ti aa6.P wanas.Lnr I_., `) lol • 0 .SO L Ir./ MINS WETA■/.an.■ TOW°■ITAWan n •.Yrt n•.r tOi//.• OOLIpL0I1/1• L. • ltur^ 1 :, a ,: =:r•C_-n \ I !.I Y kr �.� — _ ti.: r• a• ` i - ;44 •W I I 1 wear. .........44.............r 1✓ ,•.:... �i:'k'tea 4'^A .1 1RVa/MT PARCEL Or LOT �:_: fC•i 1 toot 1 i 1!" rJ 1r.:ii t }y: _. RN:Mr 10/C frror00iC0 10 aT•'v munwa !,% ^!' }::%ij�1F:�`„'r J _ MALT _ L `SY$6PYYi)F' . a ._� tv i!.,x - -- -- Q //aurora asae MAILS scan wsrwLw•r,- it . r�. — _ � (Y /r �xa-la.roe NORTH ANEW Inesx //�� _ -' —i y Q r"r or.Tow MO 1—y11 I�.MT y. / MOWS y _ AND _ :..'$ �� L1�— TM m• / TOM THUM 'MSTOn.wou�iril s.ia.iq But/ADM Li L• r0 m :f.:•.:.:Z..� usoEnn.L LOT / CENTER MEIN.PLAT IW40%Pa MS 1.1 ' , r i'.jI' / t.L1\lydl i mr'ss-_. TM —.i I.O. 1/1 _ 'I:•:: :•:: �.. / RENOVATION L., Tag,') , &Can 1 •-.. ., I ,' f , ..L 1,6,......4...., �� / 41IOI..L10rp RA I —i , �r �, . .~ /usno.0µ Car /00111.W to e IMF fp ! , --i y I \r/r .. `�. / /oullafl.TWA MI e �r� ter" i r ;� d' ,rF' .. ::.v. I•\ r/ --.-- •'r':!e.:.+�'� "!ti F �1 CONCEPT / i`t:�`_..1 r1. I, 1 Amor aWe0M1 CHU601 CIE PLAN /\� LOT• "N..':>..)4;1r• L I Io-.IL ral/0• us r•p LOT a a oa 2 � �I t rot scums w_ion c•,�+J J '.:�--— Lon s 6 J oxcar. nest A1$CAL A.ACAM trc 1yMIIn Ao�at ■ ♦ -I- ' /•r•ra•'• --- .. —_- Earm/-r-s -,1/ . /.rant itC" r•arr "vl+rl�r. ®! � Li1P" _-- NM, 1104111111.2 ' /'\ •• G Ga-.1raPa!• -1I1n.l I A� Ca•alK L �r . rz • SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) GENERA. rasTc. - Q "'ram MO2 61998 _ 81:1-1 City of,Southlake,Texas IIII STAFF REPORT November 25, 1998 CASE NO: ZA 98-135 PROJECT: Plat Revision -Lots 2R1,2R2, and 4R, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Senior Current Planner, 481-5581, ext. 787 REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision for the proposed Lots 2R1, 2R2, and 4R, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, being a revision of Lots 2, 3, and 4, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1216,Plat Records,Tarrant County, Texas, and a 1.174 acre portion of Tract 1C2 situated in the L.B.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, and being approximately 10.127 total acres. PURPOSE: Incorporate an existing pad site, a portion of Lot 4, and an unplatted tract along the north boundary into the existing Lot 2.In addition,this action subdivides the existing panhandle portion of Lot 2 into a separate lot to allow transfer of this new lot tot he City of Southlake. • LOCATION: On the northwest corner of the intersection of North White Chapel Boulevard and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). OWNERS: EPIPD - Crossroads Square, L.P., and the City of Southlake APPLICANT: Bury& Pittman- DFW, Inc. • CURRENT ZONING: "CS" Community Service District and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "C-3" General Commercial District uses excluding the following uses: frozen food lockers for individual or family use,not including the processing of food except cutting or wrapping;bowling ' alleys; conventional golf courses, including outdoor driving ranges accessory thereto, but excluding outdoor miniature golf courses; lodges, sororities and/or fraternities;medical care facilities to include nursing and care homes, hospitals with their related facilities and supportive retail and personal service uses operated by or under the control of the hospital primarily for the convenience of patients, staff and visitors; mortuaries, funeral homes and undertakers; skating rinks, ice and roller (indoor only); and taverns, clubs and other _ .____.__.._.. comparable establishments under which the on-premises consumption i of alcoholic beverages is permitted subject to issuance of a special use permit as required in Section 45 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480. City of Southlake,Texas • LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial and Public Parks/Open Space NO.NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: None P&Z ACTION: November 19, 1998; Approved (5-0-2) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated November 13, 1998, deleting Items #8.f(5' utility easement along north line of Lot 2R1),#8.g(5'utility easement along south line of Lot 2R2), and#11.b (additional R.O.W.). STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated November 13, 1998. L:\COMDEV\W P-FILES\MEMO\98CASES\98-135PR.WPD • S Sayz „dut ' 11 =RV_ _ ilg_00 Luz]& run imp. .-— • • III11.11, � 2 [ I. The JPn TRuE r k TReA ; 3 a 1 TR Mil FTia . SI rk,� CF �' seACE ` TR IA a m 9814 IC RR a r 117 le s SS��' —`EN sac ,� ±N�0' �i616 AC TR 11 178 Le 11172 a a°� r C.,•.1 : 1064 AC Zi3l5 A, 16805 IC TR Iu TR 111' •,,,,, ��,� ,' 294 Ac �p 500 AC „",:MIP',,doj T `p�0 L p ..,..:�� ' TR AD G !a riat21,"a _� •o_., 357AC r•�r•. . .` I I . I ro . 'lair 474 ki, �� ��rairwitititrn. TR%to t.TO 1 T. I l 1 1 Nog Itg,f91401. wirla 111111m.mi • 1 _ .ram_ et t;; W,/1Pià mil larkirli111110.142Eirk milWISLIELII*1121114 .1111..1. . 11111121 1 ‘.° $0 4”: inn raMOIMPIPIEPAIII 011ie ,Ilmodimmiams 'e\-\ - At" RR le InalliklOPPIPIRIM 111111114 IPPIA°1111NEill _ I Olin a a Willi1111161 milfillarAZNIIIIIIIrmil ��,mew . �.•Al 7R 2R TR 21 Ill allaWill ■■, :", aiiiiiim � - 2lt5 dCHl0 AC 21 TR 2e1 TR IE 11114111.11,1 „` !SURVEY •-686 AC TR 3R ��i TR 3LT TR MIA TR 1C2 �i, Mk. floe AC rpO\ r KM AC .04* .W \ ,.,,4 il• \ ■, TR 3B2"I TR 3B4 lll k a:rn.f: .. ■in& ..99dC � '• In 5.72 AC s TR 3C TR 306 1111111E.11 / TR 3R-' _ _ - _ • 1B . 4 L bliglillitRO :.. i Sin Tit 2e 1 a TR 2 atuI) 1c : f '�� 13uAcER � � sc� . .4 �1�wear 'TR 2C !SIR ���� Ta TR 5F ,� ; g ranorempgt1a >13t ec i cry ' !� Ac 5916 f 4.7zs do e �Ii��►,.1011 Uri*lltig :=r♦'�imNII „ga- 1 mETH it osT �\'�� V. �� molt Ida . _���1= an AC T 3N2 �;�. TR 9i • i'•• , II \\, • TR 3D u� '�� .,r►•m!.:., aluminum TR 3B • .-� �'}. zjiggLt TR TR 243 1 �� 42 AC `�aike�s�ii `=E1♦=- . 4k� ,C 4.712 1. w T■ 7 • �M1 ti TR 21 a 423TRR IF. woman ■ MI a ��j a 153 do voi �11. N'- .,1I' b MIIII4514,10, elm, WARM rry ' �w l maiill �!� •':i TR, ;\: t��lla�%! WI/ 660SdC TR 2 Mill- .111 Ili .0444/f .Te A 11111.P3cilE 4.8 Ac Ir. Alniiii"r*Pib ill ii itil z.,, 3 ic .,611,.... .wg [frowsy A ,0,\, ' or. -5811sec. 10.753 AC Y. Ia".'I� j' �P�',:2��I11" TR 2M1-Olt �i.n, ) -4 INIW , zr---.6 gi 0 0 • APAL/111111114 .0 str. 44I 7A AC We :Ali . .A.-41 mem gm 1.#,Vie>41: m111111111 Or- a*PP. 11 6, •4 mellinAlwil TR 5C Milli IMO 1111411. 44.1".11-.1:'4/ *IMO. 11::liiiiihririm:iitj Isa AC Jill 1.74V 11111.1111.:lull•a 44, T,,...i ylAz-milln";;., :___ ..". mi. map . . 1! . TR 50 4.0 IC TR 5:1 re 411111 rim Sortiviiik 44.,„ 0. ' '' igiVilt 1:-.." ....1 aii N i_ a . 104% �=,�E 1 TRACT MAP :1s ��► will;1,44 i ■ f- i , TR 8F1 w TR tlFll • •"t��• •e•• ,�' ,�I muuII.iIm* .a 1 60 do 71 do 40111V g; pr . v . 1; J . • . 1E 1R 2R 3 731 AC 0 1 EMERALD R. HARVEY CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ',Cs" CITYOF I 1R CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 1 • TR 1C2 SOUTHLAKE 6.0 AC { D. MUL2LMAN V G AM' TAT DI ` ill.°1 - _ 0 I C. coO S • _ ,,gagio/00# x, of .1: to i / TR 18 I 4 9.9 AC WYNDHAM I R. BOYD INVESTMENT �� i 7 2�� PROP. INC. 7.57 �� EPIPD- SP-2 r, sA 91 FIRS FIRST 4 SOUTHLA E #1 ® _ F. .971 al - AMERICANe 0011111111111111111111111111111111111411111 - i. ? SAVINGS �� • "C-2" Iz23 s.o Ac BANC R 117 t SOUTHLAKEgLVD G. LECHLER I STATE OF TEXAS a WHITE CHAPEL TR A / CEMETERY ' 714 s a LECHLER 2 ' / Ac / TR.3C aO-1 n I "CS" / 13.11 AcIli 8 li I 1� i �a I ADJACENT OWNERS '° 1 ' I 00 , ,Oa AND ZONING z„ I LAPEL T �ODjs I qa•� TR 3M 1 6 1.0 AC V _ ,„. . ''- auA-C 1 0 ' • • • • ' -- i93oo2o26 0.11.1.1 a n..a,w. .fl • 1 L : JH • MOGI 1 I •� ,, ::�..T.�-.rr�iwr::...'w...,..`..r.Tn.m..n'r'i.�.—.:i>wo • r am .04�..•�.-": M•• • • 5:' ...nave. >nm �,, F E .w. — ....„�r'...riw.....�w.,µ.~w•wailu.[,.1 E • wawa... °w`1 l fidg i%"y try 1 I ` a ty i... ...moo: ww........r.... '' rf1'--.1" Eu1S I , k7 Y�i �1;d'.w.. `:ra n wr T..n...T._...T:r....wr_ i 5 dal 1 �.....'.I••••TOGO a e..[.IOW.._w..T•-.`....,...•••••. • ii A ' =�'i '/ M. a.••••..-.'w,onw.m• ww.O.Or.u.cM T.rti.._ ra Ng:6-11-1. • m� \ SRN I;- I ..�.IIJI $ • "W..w.,••.•ma.••.Tw.••4�r mow. wr,FwVG N,f••.�.I I [°O o ww..w. P..n w....�`.•M..•.w. u..t Ils •./n.Y� f s _..�.o---:- .yam"`4 j I I wT'ra. = i o.d..mat,..n.••w..ww..:..,.�. ../1RSJy.//�t�"yfw',- faL'1 GRAPHIC SCALE r..,r. Ck I 0 +a" ' _44#4^`�� • ►c.v, a p la 00a10 1 GliT ill . ov�P 111 • a• I -r ,P la. .:.t_I ,.,..JILT. .. 2 I --- 7. ITT wary. m 1. I _ ?L W,IT.T..L,O�T ,,iice� 00 la Wang'[' VMS I 2J1•j,. •.s.TnJ. •� �.LL wi• W • SDUTi7LA10E 80ULEYD IF.IE. 1709) •� .T RO C CO4Y C®6"ubCof_ I v a®uD400o_LCOSOC. 4ce::.Wr • _y PUT SH00;.: o c - ! '== • LOTS 2. 2 & 4 �� . L.H.G. HALL N0.6:3 ADDITION i T. 3 .'a-je • • w.K•6I6 • W the LB.G.Nall Sun iAr�i.7(.li �• J ...,• v �.. .w•..►oo..wCe w an addition to C.,city or o....E .«o..T•. ENGINE., ",..:•. ,...I...-a...• ..•••. ry•�. .s Southle_:e �dANaNIOND® GUDFir, dc,MC wi. • Tarrant County Tem ®uCY0C6.LA�Q_ 4O^.':ACr- Cyan-,ao.®M®• .o.JA'•R.0.4®. .O.ot. Lta VCO-- DAVID A WHIM J LOTS OSPO®NPOI^QOB e.eNdO. I.J. J SUITE 32.1 ` 0• .._I wE'.Lwwe 03203 ..uT•oT.wu ..'�)titi .. ��.�w�..t��:W�-�.rww.,antra.rm �v. i0 820 ACRi.. "pr- 3 A.A. ..0 I2 2 g2 IK/41.4 L. 1Y✓ ZE DEIS/•OE'.882 vt:.,w • • -. THIS PLAT FILED IN CAAINFT A _NI.IDEp .• / . DATE J`1!/i.1..— ...._ PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAT SHOWING _.___ City of Southlake, Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY • Case No: ZA 98-135 Review No: One Date of Review: 11/13/98 Project Name: Plat Revision-Lots 2R1.2R2 and 4R,L.G.B. Hall No. 686 Addition,being a revision of Lots 2. 3, and 4,L.B.G. Hall Addition No. 686 Addition, and a 1.174 acre tract of unplatted land situated in the L.B.G. hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, being 10.127 acres out of the L.B.G. Hall Survey, Abstract No 686 • APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: EPIPD Southlake No. 1, L.P. Bury& Pittman 14990 Landmark Boulevard STE 300 5310 Harvest Hill Road STE 100 Dallas, TX 75240 Dallas, TX 75230 Phone : (972) 866-9555 Phone : (972) 991-0011 Fax : (972) 866-9888 Attn: John Maggiore Fax . : (972) 991-0278 Attn: Michael L. Clark CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/26/98 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT EDWARD MCROY AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 880. 1. Place the City case number"ZA 98-135" in the lower right-hand corner of the plat. 2. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description: 110 a. Consult with City Staff regarding appropriate ownership deed references. b. In the twelfth call from the beginning, remove the reference to the P.O.B. and the acreage calculation. c. It appears that the last call completing the boundary description should be the thirteenth call from the beginning. (S 00° 03' 51" W 632.22') 3. The following changes are needed in the owner's dedication and notary: a. In the dedication statement, change the lot designation for Lot 4 to "4R". b. Note the position within the organization for the individuals signing the owners certificate. 4 Add a lienholder statement and signature block with notary to the plat. If there is/are no lienholder(s) then add a statement to this effect. The standard language for these statements is attached. 5. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties within 200'to include properties across any adjacent R.O.W.: a. Label the deed record(volume&page) for the unplatted Whites Chapel Cemetery tract. L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98135PR1.WPD Page 1 813•1p City of Southlake, Texas b. Label the width and type of easements shown within Lot 3, 4, and 5 Diamond Circle Estates 111 Second Installment 6. To the north of F.M. 1709, list White Chapel as "N. White Chapel Blvd." List F.M. 1709 as "W. Southlake Blvd"west of White Chapel Blvd. and as"E. Southlake Blvd" east of the same intersection. 7. Label the Hiram Granberry and the Obediah W. Knight survey lines. 8. The following changes are needed with regard to easements: a. Show and label the type, size and deed record of all existing easements on the property. b. Provide easements for water,sewer and/or drainage in compliance with approved construction plans. c. Provide common access easements in accordance with the approved Site Plan currently in process for this site. (City Case No. 98-134). d. Provide dimensional ties along lot lines to all easements. Provide centerline dimensions and bearings on any easements crossing areas if deflections occur. e. Provide the signature block for abandonment of easements in accordance with Appendix 4 of the subdivision Ordinance. f. Provide a 5' U.E. along the north line of Lot 2R1 and along the west line of this lot from the northwest corner to the northeast corner of Lot 2R2. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete) g. Provide a 5' U.E. along the south line of Lot 2R2. (P&ZAction 11/19/98 Delete) h. Relocate the 20' drainage easement shown along the common lot line between Lots 4R and 2R1 so that the entirety of the easement is within one lot . I. Label the curve data for easements to remain and for those which are being established (delta, radius, length,tangent). 10. Provide a 50' setback line on F.M. 1709. 11.. The following changes are needed regarding Right-of-Way: a. Dimension R.O.W. of F.M. 1709 and N. White Chapel Blvd. from all property corners. b. Provide additional R.O.W.within Lot 4R to accommodate a free-right turn lane from N.White Chapel Blvd. onto F.M. 1709. The standard turn lane typically requires 12' of R.O.W. width for 150' with an additional 150' of transition area. Existing R.O.W. width, topography, and • other considerations may reduce or increase the actual amount of additional R.O.W. required. Amend setbacks as needed from this new R.O.W. line. (P&Z action 11/19/98 Delete) L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98135PR1.WPD Page 2 861 City of Southlake, Texas * A"Certificate of Taxes Paid"from each taxing authority must be provided to the City prior to filing this plat in the County records. * Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original signatures. * Original signatures and seals will be required three blackline mylars prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * A Developer's Agreement is required prior to any construction. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements, off-site sewer extensions, and off-site drainage and utility easements. * The applicant should be aware that new submittals for the next scheduled meeting must be received at the City by 5:00 PM on 11/23/98. If not received by that time, no review will be prepared until the following submittal schedule. All 17 revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and an 11"x 17" revised reduction must be provided. * Denotes Informational Comment •cc: EPIPD Southlake No.•1, L.P. VIA FAX ABOVE Bury & Pittman VIA FAX ABOVE David McMahan VIA FAX(817)481-4074 • L:\COMDEV\WP-FILES\REV\98\98135PR1.WPD Page 3 • 4i3.? . . . • 411/11 GLLLD 1.0 AC. MOM q- C"Of 90VINLARC,TCEAD RCIMa/0fJ1 Of A CALLED CO AC. VOL 1004 e,ra L70 CITY 0/OOUfNUKC TCRAs D.R.T.C.T. I LOT IR VOL 10J10,rPG.C70 V 0 R.T.C.T. I iE ff vs. mew lefeeorr MCI �� �r .. rou. 4 aa3C'AVC] SILO. I r,•rr morn w. / a¢,[rr.../ • t•-so' • - CALLED 1.174 AC. ` aa71'SW •- Cf1VD-CR008ROA0D BOW E.LP. s.Y.a....al.r.Ans SIIfT.1 - Y 1 dr VOL I3314,1a 100 �` .,-......„.... 1 8 J DI .R.T.C.T. � .r. N...snot b7.IV of A' �.� Z\ .- " I LOT f MI T Orr c..T:z- - - r T `-•—�w •, SLY .er r ',: :f TI 7 1 u "-' �?'J r;r,D,Tii py{,:vr1�. /f^, i J J'-' _ '. • l/ y CffT CALLED 1.11704 AC. N sOUfNIAAG 17A7 %/;..:/�/ ...m...,,, < ii, "'•IP 4 2 VOL I3344,Ia toz i i i- D R.T.C.T /LT ERR Z. COULD 0.00 AC. I' L I r R[NAWDCR Or A CALLED La1i AC. a l 12W A.cod e,CO Nf WILIAM JU7TU0.TRIRITLL I - CUVVD�t0e0R0A00 MARE.LP. • µC�y1IS VO 2824.Pa 2e0 VOL f047,PO.RS VOL 1a00.Pa!RR ill 0DS.0T. D.R.TC.T. DJ[.T.CY. ,� N anew• MOOS Y , b III. ��Lwiif WS j LOT GNI Raar.ri�_ -Jp CAI /// a Il . i i ...s,.. . ..ter m m • TOTAL AREA 1; ra l m V// y 1 ✓ COULD am ACRCO 4 (441.119 S F.)g S f �I I l- /I LOT 4 gAMONpSG T•mAT[1 OTNDHAM DNESTLI 47 VROICIRRD.PC. pa •• g Q RANDLLL c.5OTD.CT UR IA ROLE ESTATES ' VOL 100.1,fa 534 4 1 VOLL VOL Pa R012 D.R.T.C.T. M r , \I D.R.T.CT. VOL000-101.Ia00 w .1 F I� n" ` r.RT.C.T. W,W \ 10.E S�\\ /I' aIa a`Z C i u 01 AaewrT.srr. --/I/ J.J ^t -R 030.51' 'Iv -.3 xxa7 4.Q - -4..........."i- `'• 11lx EPVOIDOUTI ARC ND.1.LP. 1— ncv.dr fi .,� .y...�.m .`41. - VIG..0750.ra Lola w snr .. 1 :n.r / w��mr --,.- UI3 y DILr.C.T. 1 w,MT rx••mr I '_- . L-/ /---- LDf 4 0 — i r1r,<^1 t;,;— F.,;- - - iy mi; • I 1�� 1.1.li_ N 1 _-,.Nrr, rc._— 1, D l..wan ueun 30.75' r-- I LOT I.BLOC(1 Id Q w �Rrcr---- 1r- 1 TiRSL AMERRNN DAYwm IM' I ✓'A V"'����-"Tp• • _---—- REGD OCT 2 ii •998 • DAM ADORION °� f"- '? �i7T- r 0 I CAD.A.DUDE IJa, -.-I' {__- I.0 1: a fa..w• ...... "• Cj�•/35 IJ.T.GTy- --I� -'�_ xo„ ..J3T13• aw ,m. ,ram. I -:% /': s,� .am'xr -- ION �` r rcr `s T•'aA"• �' a Sr 'i3•• Ca.33Xlaw.•• k-214.711.I.149 I I LOTS M1.202PLAT .AND 4 . I m u... n.a' CO.-lu7r co-a 0770or■ PDV1 or ErGVIMY L_�: N `r CD..DLS'' I L.B.G. HALL NO. 686 ADDITION .I MOnCel roTIM —_. Ai.—5- T£ V_£N_S ON dTY OFSSOU AKE FAIL 1709 ROUTHUUTE BOUREVARDI i S U R V£Y, A - 2 0 4 0 TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS I1r.M•!mow ape J 10.117 ACM OJT 2,IC 1.1.0.NAa S.•.[T 000103CT UN LO.a NALL Na ON M001 015 G0.1'.I TOIL fAT.CC OC1OR11 IH0 i LOfl ' GLORI JEANNE LECHLER.CT AL I MNtro dNIO. - VOL 11040,PG.Due CENETCR7 AssDCNTION • VOL 871a,PG.2371 i OWNER/DEVELOPER OWNER SURVEYOR ' DR.TC.T. IEPO-aD1TNAL 4a 1.LP, OTT Or IQlMAR TONG •un1'•PITINN1-0IK NC. 1.0rt AIg4AR OOAEVMO Ca0.1 N.711N�A TM re1re,R;M�IOT NLL -----•---------------'-------------'----------- 'rin63a.„„nx.o-aTxa ln7).m-yn n w11 n»° Ms PLOT a DID.CAW. .•.• .OATC ...A.- ........... ...v..w 11411 I eft City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Mayor Rick Stacy and Councilmembers FROM: City Secretary Sandra L. LeGrand SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-75, Appointments to the Library Board Resolution No. 98-75, provides for the appointment of seven members to the Library Board which was established on October 20, 1998 with the Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 716. The Board is to act as an advisory board to the City Council in matters relating to library facility planning and programming. The Board will consist of seven citizens to be appointed for two-year terms, with the terms staggered so that three members will be appointed on odd-numbered years and four members appointed on even-numbered years. Initially, three members (Places 1, 2 and 3) will be appointed to serve a one-year term to expire in 1999, with subsequent appointments being for two years. The City received twenty-one applications for the Library Board, which are attached to this memo and resolution for your consideration. Interviews are scheduled for Monday, November 30`h, 6:00 p.m. in the Administrative Conference Room at 1725 E. Southlake Boulevard. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this item. /sl Attachment: Resolution 98-75 Applications from: Debbie Baynard Cynda Mast Pamela Bickford Pamela Muller Maria Cameron Lisa Nichols Jerome Cannon C.D. Peebles Karen Cienki Wanda Poe Ellen Foreman Barbara Rose Leon Horowitz Zena Rucker Deanna Kienast Catherine Singley June Koelker Andres Villareal F.C. LeVrier Marjorie Zielke Scott MacLeod d:\wp-files\citysec\resol\98-75mem.doc 9A-1 City of Southlake, Texas RESOLUTION NO. 98-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE LIBRARY BOARD; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on October 20, 1998 the City Council for the City of Southlake, Texas, approved Ordinance No. 716, establishing a Library Board to act as an advisory board to the City Council relating to all nature of library facility planning and programming; and, WHEREAS, the Board shall consist of seven (7) citizens of the City of Southlake, Texas, and who shall be appointed by the City Council for two (2) year terms, provided three (3) members shall be appointed each odd-numbered year and four (4) members be appointed each even-numbered year. Members shall serve without compensation until their successors are appointed. Places on the Board shall be numbered one (1) through seven (7); WHEREAS, the City Council may appoint ex-officio members to the Board. Such ex- officio members shall be appointed on an annual basis and the term of office of such ex-officio members shall be one year from the date of appointment. Such ex-officio members shall have no voting authority. Vacancies on the Board are to be filled by appointment by the City Council for the length of the unexpired term. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the citizens to appoint a seven (7) member Library Board to serve two year terms as described above, with the provision that the appointment of three (3) of the members, which are to be appointed each odd- numbered year, will be appointed initially to serve one year terms to expire in 1999 and subsequent appointments of three (3) members will coincide with odd-numbered years for two year terms. Section 2. At the Council's discretion, ex-officio members may be appointed on an annual basis to serve for a term of one year. Section 3. The City Council hereby appoints the following seven (7) members to serve on this Board: Place 1 Expire 1999 Place 2 Expire 1999 Place 3 Expire 1999 • Place 4 Expire 2000 City of Southlake, Texas V Resolution No. 98-?? 111, December 1, 1998 Page 2 Place 5 Expire 2000 Place 6 Expire 2000 Place 7 Expire 2000 (optional) Ex-Officio Expire 1999 Section 3. This resolution is hereby effective upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 1' DAY OF DECEMBER, 1998. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS III BY: Mayor Rick Stacy ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary D:\WP-FILES\CITYSEC\RESOLUTI\98-75.doc City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 30, 1998 To: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager From: Charlie Thomas, Deputy Director of Public Works Subject: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a developer agreement for The Woods • Background - The Woods Addition consists of 8 residential lots and is located in the southeast corner of the intersection of Florence Road and Pearson Lane. The Addition was platted in 1996 but never developed because of a lack of access to sanitary sewer. All lots have access to public water and frontage on either Florence Road or Pearson Lane. The only • public infrastructure to be built is the sanitary sewer. An estimated one-half of these lots will be located in the S-1 Drainage Basin. Through the interlocal agreement with the City of Keller, these lots may be connected to the Keller Sanitary Sewer System. The eastern lots are in the S-2 Drainage Basin; therefore, the developer will install a sanitary sewer line to serve these lots and tie into the sewer line in Sutton Place. The developer of The Woods will pay the required Park Fee of$4,000 (8 lots at $500 each). The City will collect the appropriate water, sewer and street impact fees when building permits are issued. This is a standard agreement with the usual requirements and no unusual requests or variances. Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a developer agreement for The Woods. Please place this item on the December 1, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. detagoe ;16"-ea**4--" CT/ts 110 Attachment: Agreement Plat M:\wd-files\projects\the woods da memo.doc 10A-1 THE WOODS DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An Agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer", of The Woods Addition, hereinafter referred to as the "Addition" to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the 8 lots contained within the Addition and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. • B. Since the Developer is prepared to develop the Addition as rapidly as possible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residential building activity begin as quickly as possible and the City is desirous of having the subdivision completed as rapidly as possible, the City agrees to release 10% of the lots,(one),` after installation of the water and sewer mains. Framing shall not commence until water quality is approved by the City and all appropriate Fire Code requirements are satisfied, and street signs with street names are in place. Temporary all-weather metal signs securely fastened in the ground are acceptable until permanent street signs are installed. The Developer recognizes that the remaining building permits or Certificates of Occupancy for residential dwellings will not be issued until the supporting public works infrastructure including permanent street signs with block numbers and regulatory signs within the Addition have been accepted by the City. This will serve as an incentive to the Developer to see that all remaining items are completed. 41110 The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-2 Pr C. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letters of Credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts, up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2) years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All Letters of Credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. D. The value of the performance bond, Letters of Credit or cash escrow will reduce at a rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Each request for reduction or payment of escrow funds must be accompanied by lien release(s) executed by all subcontractors and/or suppliers prior to the release of escrow funds or reduction in value of the account. Performance and payment bond, Letters of Credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity 1111 reasonably acceptable to the City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. If the Developer chooses to construct bar ditches in lieu of curb and gutter, and the City approved the design and grade of bar ditches, Developer understands and agrees to provide maintenance on the bar ditches for a period of two years from the date of acceptance of the Addition. Maintenance includes trash and debris cleanup, mowing, and erosion control. E. Until the performance and payment bonds, Letters of Credit or cash escrow required in Paragraph C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the Addition shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said Addition by Developer, save and except as provided above. The Woods Developer Agreement 1 0A-3 Pirr F. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly authorized representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. G. On all public facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract, Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent (3%) of the cost of the water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer ® facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing fee equal to two percent (2%) of the cost of water, street, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing (95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for re-testing as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. • The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-4 Pr 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade (95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and acceptance by the City. H. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses, hereinafter referred to-as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonable maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen (15) days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Should such cost remain unpaid for 120 days after notice, the City can file a lien on such property so maintained. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. J. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, provided that the City, through the City Manager, shall retain • the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. S The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-5 • II. FACILITIES A. On Site Water The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. Drainage Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, released by the City Engineer, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. The Developer hereby agrees to comply with all provisions of the Texas Water Code. C. LAW COMPLIANCE Developer hereby agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws that are applicable to development of this Addition. D. STREETS 1. The street construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. Streets will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the • Developer's engineer and released by the City Engineer. The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-6 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a. Installation and two year operation cost of street lights, which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition; b. Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances; c. Installation of all regulatory signs recommended based upon the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices as prepared by the Developer's engineer by an engineering study or direction by the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features, however, should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and they City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer hereby agrees to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. • The Woods Developer Agreement 1 0A-7 • E. ON SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and released by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain sewer lines are to be oversized because of City of Southlake requirements, the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. F. EROSION CONTROL During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be S implemented for this subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the Developer's expense. All expenses must by paid to the City prior to acceptance of the Addition. G. AMENITIES It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture, pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. • The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-8 Pr H. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping, irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer and his successors and assigns understand that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall, at his own cost and expense, defend and protect the City against all such claims and demands. START OF CONSTRUCTION Before the construction of the streets, and the water, sewer, or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. 4. Developer Agreement executed. 5. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance, naming the City as co- insured, prior to commencement of any work. 6. A pre-construction meeting between Developer and City is required. Developer or contractor shall furnish to the City a list of all subcontractors and suppliers, which will be providing greater than a $1,000 value to the Addition. • The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-9 pr III. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. INDEMNIFICATION DEVELOPER COVENANTS AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND DOES HEREBY INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE OR LOSS AND/OR PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS OF WHATSOEVER KIND OR CHARACTER, WHETHER REAL OR ASSERTED, (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE FEES AND EXPENSES OF ATTORNEYS, EXPERT WITNESSES AND OTHER CONSULTANTS), ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OCCUPANCY, USE, EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF SAID IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL FURTHER BE LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY AND ALL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF DEVELOPER, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, • SUBCONTRACTORS, LICENSEES, INVITEES, OR TRESPASSERS. DEVELOPER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FOR ANY DAMAGES, CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION, OR OF THE CONCURRENT NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMMISSION, OF THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it • being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-10 Fr. ® the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgement which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection herewith. D. This Agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this Agreement for which the Developer ® awards his own construction contract, the Developer agrees to employee a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. F. Work performed under the Agreement shall be completed within two (2) years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period, the City may, at its election, draw on the performance bond, Letter of Credit, or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense, provided however, that if the construction under this Agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the Agreement with such renewed Agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. G. The City is an exempt organization under Section 151.309, Tax Code, and the facilities constructed under this Agreement will be dedicated to public use and accepted by the City upon acknowledgement by the City of completion under Paragraph 1.F. The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-11 ® 1. The purchase of tangible personal property, other than machinery or equipment and its accessories, repair, and replacement parts, for use in the performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151, Tax Code, if the tangible property is: a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement; and b. completely consumed at the job site. 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. ® H. Prior to final acceptance of this phase the Developer shall provide to the City three (3) copies of Record Drawings of this phase, showing the facilities as actually constructed. Such drawings will be stamped and signed by a registered professional civil engineer. In addition, the Developer shall provide • electronic files showing the plan and profile of the sanitary sewer, storm drain, roadway and waterline; all lot lines, and tie in to the state Plane Coordinate System. IV. OTHER ISSUES A. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE B. OFF-SITE WATER C. PARK FEES The Developer agrees to pay the Park Fee of$500 per lot, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483-F, Section 7.0. There are approximately 8 lots in Addition, which would bring the total cost of Park Fee to $ 4,000. The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-12 • D. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-A. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. • DEVELOPER: • By: Title: Address: SSTATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscrobed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public • My commission expires: The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-13 • IPPV CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Rick Stacy, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: • • The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-14 REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The Letter of Credit may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding $10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the Letter of Credit. 3. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The Letter of Credit must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six percent (6%), and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. • 6. Partial drawings against Letter of Credit must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining Letter of Credit. 9. Expiring Letter of Credit must be replaced by substitute Letters of Credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the Letter of Credit held by the City. The Woods Developer Agreement 10A-15 0 0 e • • . • . . . ,T .mosom rontsc . • Ix S'i- • 044 0/1110 0101.1104 . • . on ,....„, .. P..... 44 - . - ao4.44e•..,.• aLara% vISTa fli, ..fav I... • 1Z, 06 10.113,P.6.7.4 .L.3.4.•.04.1•11142. .4411 OF 4444444 ••••.34 ••4 val....0, 01 i a :7.,:.. 00.0 RP,. • p... Vr: I r .,.. CITY of at•Lam_.__..._. ....... .'''.''''''''"".‘"To 101 0.0 ts0.04 • • -. _...... '''-- I ""'"'"'" ave.a-.06 ''''''"'''''''''"•::::':%::'::14:%::.•':'''''1''''''''''10 0 1 Polvor 0 S.11I• . ,....-.6... ff.0......• F LORENCE-ROAD ...•,,.. ,,.,..- - +0111.0.....r.y. ____,.... ......0.wt.4.0.6 S 00 a•12. 0.0 6.1''''''.'''''ass /On otscoafidaY;,...; ,,,r- ....wt. I 1 ..Om'''''''''''''''•I t..barslm Mc'''''try...14 • zr ....-...”,,...-,-j___....-_,00 oo---,00 00..,,,,,,,....,..1.10 -7,-., --- --•-cso ss--• 1 ...os ........, •o• v.:4.60 las . 0,00 Lixt .f tso etc.............t......6,sold...............oa.fr. ..so ,. ... I •-••-•-I-I ......14.....•SFr 1.0 al th•...............4..... ......C......00.0........t•Os Cltr st......•0..... s 41 "11 0 • 0•eat 4......'0.61....11.11..Tss•11.04 40..... ii ...:. :.....:74 11 II. Lot 1 . g : : ,• .I . . .. . • g . I: -- i I • a..... Wu.III..Pose 11..Deed 14.41. • ,..• Lol 4 C Lot] „...: . Lol 8 ." Lol 7 . Lol a .2.. "..."''''" I 1414. S.0•T4I•00 C.40.01 f........1.4 VOst 110 4.1.1sSt • •ii ,0,... .....6.0••• 1 a Locm 3 . .11......i..0 at tb•......... cc •A 7•so ac -:,,1 a 020C •0". Lou.. r a 401•C . 2.000•C .• '.••••• :I g - I • ......of.....troll •••••••.04t C01011•10 mi.11.04 u.I.1 •ar i • m . 0 • Ty •• . •• vOL 00-10.Pa TT :O • • 4 I I B L 0 C K I na.cg 1..00 • 4....44..ft.] I •Irs•.....4 th..................1140. • . V:: %::.:I::.it.......::'1:;::';.'a .....Ms,Slab........ • I ,,o- • I ...... 1 III ass.S • ZOO. I.JO .10 0.0 .1.00 '"' __:_-__ ."" t::=I 1 4.4.0. I.4...40•11.V.41.1......1.4 444 tat 1 4. 1.4s;Emi,....t.•,-...1.-.-..n7.,..1..1:0•4•0 ---;,-,.7...., ,,,,,,„,„....744.SS'So'•-,:SAso 7 --r' - -4 a......I,. I """ ;01:;;P"If.i.:N14'6. . ::..411:•:: ...4..006 LOT I .11........41..1 400.4. I ../...••;.• II .. • . Ca•a.1001 111. •LaCal VISTA TII•al .01.4I .......... I / 1 I '. ;••' II I 4010.4.31 I I • I I • . I.144-0..1 „III _L. 1 -1-I .r.......0211 1.1.ire ats ar............. TOT...T.C.....th.............11.4............MU.plot • CUMBERLAND TRAIL I •6. 14......te um Clls of I........,.......C...... ..14 d......... I I . I I I •do......I.the ass Ilf tb.'WI.511.......6f...sod ..............4/NI.011 --,...,‘,.... • • • • •1111 t la 'ji'. • . - . , . • Eli 1 i ....1. I 3° • • . CI..0...... ......pg..14.....................4m thls 44.................. W.T.C..........Is.6 16 1.Ille...........as..Is..........Is Um .5.4......1.....le..that h.........th.'se.1.r • I .4 • . • . - . ...A • .. day a) 04.4 4.6.am PIM kV' jarlarit,:::.A..11.1.O.0Iflifs.this YUF I . ..1":•21i-11011401M111111107:.: . ' allogret4.E41.4 Ital.af Zan" 1........of all......let..4411......T. lilliii-.11:1114-16---111111 ps cs............lres .. .........I.........to.I..Cltr 1.....1.1..0......... • • • iliTi crlik-ril ,. • , . • - ••Mt.0.40 OF 110 LOT iviThen 4..0.0 0..... 7.•.1;iiiii 111011111111114. : • 10 . - 0/4 160.0 if•00L/ilt.OF.....CI.0I0 CIT.0.1010110, .0 13 S...01 TO...0•4060.11.OF 0040/441 #4 arit'llillilleg Fe. ./--.- . 0,01.0.1.4. ELLIgrailieN51 . • • . . -- P, ' • . ... .'-'"?.P_ _Mtiolli t • . _..i.l. -P".•;;I!!6;41 . 1 • • k 11,i•g.".Aillit.01 .! . ft5 HAP ip ••••. . .....r.e.,--co . .7•T - • ph rt-I, -•-....,‘,.. il.41400:11 0 1140 MOM. • 1.04 F. ' .04.1.00M . • • 11 0.0 Ag?%.0.,,,m0•2 ZL.P1P6 viC0 0.• 4 • .......lila I.....i .4 116..11 . 1st............01. 00..sad po.I.4 SC•ll 1,1000 • .s4 40.•thi.410...................thiil C0.11. '••• 44-te--,...1---.. . . ......••••11 0 0.....0......Imo ea.5.4.r.1....• . . - . . ' ..•.._ ar....• ...•dit *. 44''''. 1(..•--. ...... J THFIEN ALW PLAT • S • ......• Llin..4......• ..7.,7..14...4.-r 2ot(A IL A0.•ge • • .......... PIM • OF .11' •441/4, • , 01.110.lot wog , .. ..,.r • AN 400ITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTMLAICE IN •• TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS.BEING A TRACT IN THE. .Pm ...... • J.J.FRESHOUR SURVEY ABSTRACT 80.521 P.O.10 116 /C . M • LOTS • .11-11;...11 - • a I..111•1111.111.1 • . 17.082 Ac. A NM iy41/47 IwIteiltg - L.....,--,.., i • ... A u g ust 2 2,1990 THISPLAT FILED al CAJIINET---SLICH-.0ATE . • . . • PrCity of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM • November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorization to advertise for bids for a pump, motor, and electrical switchgear for modifications to the Southlake / Keller Pump Station . I Background There are currently 4 pumps operating at the Southlake / Keller Pump Station, which pump the water from the City of Fort Worth to Southlake and Keller. A total pumping capacity of 22 to 24 MGD was used on several occasions during the summer of 1998. In doing so, the existing pumps at the pump station were pumping above their design capacity. As Keller and Southlake water demands continue to increase, it is recommended that additional pumping capacity be added to the Southlake / Keller Pump Station. This can be accomplished by replacing the smallest 3 MGD pump with a 10 MGD pump. To expedite this expansion before the summer of 1999, it will be necessary for the critical 411 elements for the pump station modifications, which are the pump, motor, and electrical switchgear be prepurchased due to the lead-time. The attached memorandum developed by Freese & Nichols, Inc. outlines the necessary schedule of events required to have the modifications complete by June 1999. Following the award of bid for the prepurchased items, bids will be advertised for the installation of the prepurchased items. The estimated cost for the prepurchase items is $105,000. The estimated cost for the installation of the equipment is $195,000. The equipment and installation cost, which is estimated to total $300,000, is proposed to be funded from the 1998-1999 capital improvements budget. However, under our contract with the City of Keller, the costs associated with improvements to the water distribution system for Southlake and Keller from Fort Worth shall be incurred 50% from each city. Recommendation Staff recommends Council authorization to advertise for bids for a pump, motor, and electrical switchgear for modifications to the Southlake / Keller Pump Station. Please place this item on the December 1, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. r-f. ",-4 --- BW/sep Attachments: Memorandum dated November 10, 1998 10B-1 411.' fill SimonMarvin W.Freese.,P.E. 1900-1990 Malvin C. ese.,Nichols,P.E 1896-1969 N FREESE- ICHCDLS MEMORANDUM To: Shawn Poe, City of Southlake From: Thomas Haster, Freese and Nichols Re: Southlake/Keller Pump Station Modifications Date: November 10, 1998 We have examined the proposed SouthlakeKellerPump Station expansion in more detail to determine the timing of the required shut downs to allow for the installation of a new 10 MGD pump. We have confirmed that the new 10 MGD Pump will fit in the location ofthe existing 3 MGD Pump with some piping modifications. It is our understanding that the City is not able to take the pump station out of service for tie-ins after May 1, 1998,because ofthe high summer demands. To meet this schedule it is recommended S that the critical elements ofthis project,PUMP,MOTOR AND THE ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR be prepurchased. It will be necessary to have several pump station shutdowns of approximately 6 hours in duration. With the schedule we have developed below,the last ofthese shutdowns will occur no later than May 1, 1999. November 20, 1998 Submit Prepurchase Documents to City for Review November 21, 1998 Advertise Prepurchase Documents November 25, 1998 Finish Prepurchase Documents December 10, 1998 Receive Prepurchase Bids December 15, 1998 Award Pump, Motor and Switchgear Contracts December 16, 1998 Submit Pump Installation Plans & Specs. to City for Review .\`0 EDecember 22, 1998 Execute Purchase Order for Pump, Motor and Switchgear RA �r01``�December 29, 1998 Review Pump, Motor and Switchgear Submittals 00 Giv December 30, 1998 Finish Pump Installation Plans & Specs. a e 50 000 ,,e' January 2, 1998 Advertise Pump Installation Plans & Specs. s6 1 �A. January 19, 1999 Receive Pump Installation Bids �,0d February 2, 1999 Award Pump Installation Contracts February 11, 1999 Preconstruction Meeting&Issue Notice to Proceed to Contractor March 9, 1999 First Shut Down to Bring in Temporary Electrical Service March 23, 1999 Second Shut Down to Relocate Starter#4 to New Location April 27, 1999 Third Shut Down to Install New Switchgear Sections ill June 1, 1999 Install New 10 MGD Pump & Motor, Pump Control Valve and Piping (No Shutdown Required) 108-2 Pr We have prepared a schematic attached showing the proposed electrical modifications for the new 10 • MGD pump. It will be necessary for the contractor to bring in temporary power to operate 1-5 MGD • pump and 1-10 MGD pump will work is being completed on the new electrical switchgear sections. As you can see,this is a fairly tight project schedule. Forus to proceed and meet this schedule,we need the City's blessing and notice to proceed as soon as possible. It will require additional engineering effort (approximately$6,500) forus to put together separate prepurchase documents for the long delivery items mentioned above. This was not anticipated in our original engineering contract. Our contract is a cost plus engineering contract and it is unknown at this time if any additional compensation will be required. However,we feel that it is our responsibility to let you know ofany changes in the engineering scope prior to proceeding ahead. If you have any questions please call me. • • 4110 10B-3 V Title : Goo-Nt-PrKE/KILLER P,S, CXPANS(ON Date : 11/Io /Re . st�c.TR.apicL MootFlc?TtoC F R, NEW t o CACTQ PrMP By : -vWto/T c J EixtSTtaC MISC.. srR 1 sTR#i sTR-r3 srR-4`;Li- METER MAIN SwIT &EAR Clow) (toad) , (loco) (moo) 6200) 6200) (t2c0) LAYoU T' 3 MG-0 5 MGD 1OMGD loMCst 2-GttR StlintokalS R5LoCATi= DISCDNA.1Ecr @ NIG-HZ"5 x SRMEr tN M RIR NEW toMGb . /-rEMF/oRARY sYsrEMRc EFoRI= }LV PvrmP /�/ =LEI, SERVICE �R=ModE APRIL 1.) l`'i S` _ _ 1 r . -�tiTERIM ;� Mtsc. STRY1 srR# maTSR MntN < 2 sTR 3 > eswrit.14G-EAR (tco) (12co) (t *) 02.6) ` oz.)) 62c6) LAYouT 5McrD toMcr(1) '!- GFIR SiluTboW&) BRING tN tvEW roc_ (� NlC-f}r TIE-ta To Extst MGC B�FaRE / 1 MF,Y fi t991 F:N�t_ misc., sTR;*d-- SR.1;2 STR NSA) N_k3 NEV.) tJtTC-GEr?R 3 STR,#4- METER r1 A I N S L your (E°°°) (I2co) ((coo) (12oa) (I6do) CI coo) (tCis) 4 NE\J 5 MO toMCr6 ' to MG-4 to MGD PRoPosED ELECTRICAL (icH &EAR NtotP (CATIONS FOR NEW IC MG-b POMP @ SoUThiLAKE/KEILER P, S, • irlai 1OB-4 F........... Page Of City of Southlake, Texas 0 MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell,Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Sign variance appeal for a wall sign for Crestwood office building at 1100 East Southlake Boulevard. As per our discussion with Council, Mr. Mathews has removed the monument sign from the area in front of his building, as requested. He is requesting a sign variance as outlined in the attached memo from Charles Bloomberg. Mr. Mathews has also provided a scale drawing of the requested signs to be attached to a stone wall that will be erected facing F.M. 1709. The building is 40' from the right-of-way and Mr. Mathews is proposing a 15' setback from the building itself, thus allowing plenty of room to meet the 15' from the right-of-way rule. If you have any technical questions,please contact Charles Bloomberg, Paul Ward or me. Mr. Mathews will be present at the City Council meeting to address any questions or concerns. 6 c.4 .....--- BC/bls ' Attachments • • , , 10C-1 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM November 19, 1998 TO: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety FROM: Charles Bloomberg, Plans Examiner ' SUBJECT: Revised Crestwood Sign Appeal 1100 E. Southlake Blvd. We received the revised plan November 17, 1998. Mr. Matthews had the monument sign removed from the property. The revised wall sign is intended to be the only signage on the front side of the building. This sign will substitute for both the attached signs and the monument sign that would be allowed by ordinance. The sign ordinance permits one monument sign 50 square feet each face per site and one attached sign .75 square feet per foot of frontage for each lease space. For this 260 feet long building a total of 195 square feet of attached sign would be permitted. Mr. Matthews proposes to build a wall of varying height from three to four-and-one-half feet • high. The wall would have offsets for planters and to allow for adjustments due to topography. The wall has provisions for a maximum of seven sign panels totaling 250 square feet. At this time there are only five tenants in the building however two spaces are large enough that they could possibly be subdivided in the future. In the present configuration there would be a total of 184 square feet of sign area. It is expected the Ebby Halliday sign would be illuminated with channel lit letters and the others with ground mounted flood lights. Mr. Matthews stated they have had discussions with the Ebby Halliday tenant but they need to obtain their final approval also in order for this to happen. Attach sign drawing xc Paul Ward CB 0 CrestwoodSign2.rtf • 10C-2 .. • • • • _. . . . . . . . . . . .• . . ra CITY OF SOUTHLAKE February 6, 1��� SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION • APPLICANT OWNER fif different) NAME: G.. STD od j, r/9'At/if_7 'ADDRESS: 2 Jo / CFOi9/2 t?"4 y.vs,r,,41 ad/ 1),1 6 4i9,t; 7 K?r 7,rov/ . PHONE: f/7- 3 2 9-6 5'96 FAX: 8/p- 5e8/- ere. ' 7 . The foJZowina information pertains to the location for which the variance is being requested: NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: C/f1:-3-7- OA 4= Pe/4,i'e=45 Ar//'< • PHYSICAL ADDRESS: ,1/9 2 45 ' v74'/,9A c- ,43 /v • LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot /,/ Block / Subdivision Z,t. j4-45IP.d e2/FjcC,2.9�,e certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign - ance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a 'eby _ sentative at the City Council meeting who is authorized to discuss this request, address any unresolved issues, and approve changes, if any. Applicant's Signature: -71)i ���/ Date: / c2 -/ �8 For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the sign variance application and the appliction fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 199_. Signed: Title: The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required .by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 506 and amendments, and other ordinances,maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. Completed sign variance request application. Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached.) . Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan • • shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R.O.W. Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show the building, the sign for which the variance is requested, and any other signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. . '10C-3 . 0 • ' . . 1111 • .. .. . . . j • , • , ; i ' tii ! TT ......". -.),., ,.../i 1 •-- • . . = ! : ! ; ...„:„....) \,........................17 Mill ') r -----...„ \ ......"" . . . ,r.„..;:;,,P.!-*••................... i . • •.,"-\ „e"...1\ .• :i N,' I! 1—STE-i-i-LI t ( / . : ‘ H 11 I 1 • .: ; ... . —1-1 • — ... _SITE_EL AN . gL SECTION. . s•.-....u.:.....,• . SOUL- ' C--) ;,.____ ___•- -:-,. ..—.--&>: •2, tr ..---:-.7-1 •01'44%.... . ... '1-111=4---rege- I:.....''11. .- •• `.-STONE ww. RAW= •••••-SIGN ELPATION 1 .r: WC ST0,1 CAP . , STUCCO I. i STUCCO , / . O.-0. -1 cAsr STOKE CAP-.„..so 'f7- . i -1..]. FASIUGGEISSTITEL -,:•---_ , AUSTIN=OM VENEER SAS=uENTIER LETTEILLNG 1 ri... .._4 _ ;1-( t•Z ek, ,1 ',AMERICAN IITLE COMPANY ___i__,L ' • 1 ;"- \ 4ctitickt R EALTO RS t d,4.-,. f ' J272.:_at-, ,-, : i • --.=,* 11.- i ; ,,- . ' : t--- olATC11 EX1111TS0 - • . . . . •,"T•2 I • .--"• • , • 1 • SLOG.1.011 COLOR. 7 • . •.....-7......r. . . • ' ' : 1 . ' : : • ! : T : : : r • I ' T .'". . • ' -...• . •., •----- 1... '• ---N"---.1.377v non mum . .....:-.---.. , • -..i. : . t .• •.. MAIN SIGN ELEVkTION Ik.50 eQ,:i.a.G f- G-r- . __TYP....SIGN_ELE_VATION IL. i. 33 i; 5 aoit.ze PEST 1:.:1.i.-_-.1.-o 'SGUL IGNI...0. . -.SIGN SECTION__ SCAM P..1:Kt. . . ' • SIGNAGE PLAN GOOD FULTON &FARRELL ARCHITEC1 CRESTWOOD OFFICE PARK 3102 Os;1.s..A.n.o - - SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS - • - S..MC Wes.loses 7434 Sul/SiS•ISSS •• Wu ':.. '.e-.•-•; .•;•-.,;'. ;- k.sTM IgT r•........R.,...ia. .. ... Pas Vs/524672. .• • City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM • November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Authorizing staff to proceed with acquisition of right-of-way for construction of Michael Drive Background In order to proceed with infrastructure improvements necessary to bring the area along Michael Drive into compliance with city ordinances, the city must acquire the required right-of-way. Attached is a copy of the plat of Tiffany Acres,which shows the properties affected. The right-of-way width required by the city for industrial or commercial property is 60'. Therefore, each property owner along Michael Drive will be required to dedicate a 30' wide strip of property along the frontage of Michael Drive measured from the centerline of Michael Drive. • . Staff has prepared detailed cost estimates in previous memorandums to City Council outlining the costs of constructing the required infrastructure to bring the area into compliance. The cost associated with the reconstruction of Michael Drive is dependent on whether the existing gravel base is sufficient for the road base. Staff has retained the services of a Roan Engineers, a geotechnical engineering firm, to perform tests on the gravel base to determine if the in situ gravel is sufficient to use as the road base. A report will be submitted to staff with the test results and recommendations on November 29, 1998. Therefore, staff will be prepared to discuss the cost associated with reconstructing Michael Drive in more detail at the City Council meeting. Once staff has received authorization to acquire the right-of-way for Michael Drive, a surveying firm will be retained to produce the required instruments necessary to obtain the right-of-way from each property owner. Recommendation Staff recommends authorizing staff to proceed with acquisition of right-of-way for construction of Michael Drive. Please place this item on the December 1, 1998 Regular City Council Agendaa fffoor-Ci `_Council review and consideration. Attachments: Tiffany Acres Plat 1 OD-1 P7A. City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Any action necessary to proceed with granting a sanitary sewer easement along the westerly property line of City owned Tract 6F, T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract 706 (also known as former Glosser Tract) in order for Countryside Bible Church to construct a sanitary sewer line Background Attached is a letter dated November 6, 1998 from Countryside Bible Church requesting a sanitary sewer easement across the above referenced property. The sanitary sewer easement is required in order for the church to connect to the sanitary sewer located in the Fox Hollow Addition. 1111 Staff has researched the request to determine the closest and most appropriate access point to an existing sewer line to serve the church. Exhibit 1 shows the proposed route of the sanitary sewer line required to be constructed to serve Countryside Bible Church. The nearest connection point to an existing sanitary sewer line is at the end of Fox Glen in the Fox Hollow development. The proposed sewer line would have to extend southeasterly from the manhole at the end of Fox Glen along the property line of Lot 9 of the Fox Hollow development. There is an office building currently being constructed. In order to complete the sanitary sewer extension, a sanitary sewer easement will also have to be obtained from the owner of Lot 9; it is our understanding that the church has already made the necessary agreement with the property owner. The proposed sewer line would then extend south along the westerly property line of the former Glosser Tract to the church property. Although there are several oak, cedar elm, and cedar trees along the property line of the city-owned tract, the sewer line alignment will be offset from the property line and deflect at certain points; thus there will be minimal damage to the existing trees in the area. Until a survey identifying the existing topography and trees along the western side of the city owned tract is obtained by the church, the exact limits of the proposed sanitary sewer easement is not known. The easement will be oriented in such a manner so as to minimize the tree damage during the construction of the sanitary sewer line. 10E-1 .• Recommendation • Staff recommends any action necessary to proceed with granting a sanitary sewer easement along the westerly property line of City owned Tract 6F, T.M. Hood Survey, Abstract 706 (also known as former Glosser Tract) in order for Countryside Bible Church to construct a sanitary sewer line. Please place this item on the December 1, 1998 Regular City Council Agenda for City Council review and consideration. 61/7 BW/sep Attachments: Letter dated November 6, 1998 Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 (Area Map) • 10E-2 Nir - ,_ 11 rul j3 *-Th 1 NOV 9 9998 1 2)I 0 OFFICE OF CITY 1 • COUNTRYSIDE BIBLE CHURCH November; 6, 1998 • Curtis Hawk, City Manager City of Southlake 1725 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk, r Countryside Bible Church would like to request an easement on the City-owned property q ty P P rtY described as"along the western section of Tract 6J out of Ellis Shivers Survey, Abstract 300." This would allow us to connect to the sewer located in the Fox Hollow Addition. This would allow Countryside to expand its parking lot to the West of the present parking lot for greatly needed additional parking space. Presently that is impossible due to the sewer laterals which are located in that area. If you need additional information, please call. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, Pastor Tom Watson TEW/eb Torn Watson, Pastor ■ Byron Yawn, Associate Pastor • Rocky Wyatt, Youth Pastor. 250 COUNTRYSIDE CT • SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 ■ (817) 488-5381 - METRO (817) 481-3375 10E-3 • / \ ,Uv UI 4, �i .. 43 4 it ,. \iii hi( (.„ ft' Ni// \ 111 C, \ , , 1• 111 it ` l 131 1 ' l= U1 lu 21 i o ,:1 '661 / 41„00 ,:ec„00 •- IV // II) / �� 9m tit.) / / .. L _ • (qy I lo i to u ( w /` iu 40 / / 113.0. O a I y 1y `0J \� p in A) OV o o ` c; .w • p p. 77 i:. / / •i0m / / ta3 / y �I .! I • h.' '. / I IS Sr /\— I s, /Q s l / _cii Ui S 00° 09' 00dE 321 40' /// ;4 ' ��' • Ii �py2 , /C,L1 d .a, ,) 1/- , ,4, 4'4,V • 1,) , / ' nn T.W. DI.(7:iSER ET UX DEBRA i �1 1 .ti / r' 'O � u / '�� •,� VQ1.l1M1: .11.(,1:1, I'flI 1101, D.R.1',E. I• 'Q pi u /, /� LA •• VI 1„ C• l.) n • I i Q a) i 1•J i , //, 1'1 ' j% at I ' / .t; i; I // l' • NOV. 2 . 199 12:47PM ARCHITECTUAL SERVICE NO. 173s P. 2 vliv UA VWD M. SCHWARZ ,: . II 1 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, INC, 05 Architects,ins. 24 November 1998 Mr.Curtis E. Hawk City Manager City of Southiake Administrative Offices 1725 E, Southiake Boulevard Southlake,TX 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk: Thank-you for your letter of November 19th. We have reviewed each of the points you identified and can agree to each given the following clarifications. There needs to be a better understanding and more complete definition as to the scope of "all professional services"to be provided in order for a fixed fee proposal to be viable. Obviously we cannot foresee all of the potential consultants that the City may or may not,wish to be involved in the project. For example, the city may wish to have a communications consultant .40 retained to design a fiber optics communication network for the Town Hall Project. We have not contemplated such a consultant in our fee calculations. Therefore,we think it best to use the A o n standard the B t A l de initons standard in industry and identified in AIA Document B 1`+1, a copy of which is enclosed, as the definition of standard services. We are prepared to agree to a fixed fee not to exceed 10%($i 2 million),for all Basic architectural design services,conditional upon,that if the budget confirmation provided by a City hired independent construction cost consultant or constriction manager(CM),yields a construction cost in excess of S12 million,the scope of the building will be modified to make it compatible with the S12M budget rather than increasing the budget over S 12 million. We will design the Town Hall within the S 12 million budget provided that prior to the execution of an agreement and commencement of our services a budget and project scope confirmation is prepared by a constriction cost consultant or CM to vein that the City's desired building can be built for that budget. As we have said to both you and the Council in the past,an architect's estimate is not a sufficient check on construction costs. Given that, and the City's accelerated schedule, a cost consultant or CM(we would advise CM)will need to be retained by the City during the design phases to provide continuous cost reviews as well as budget confirmations at . the end of each design phase. In the end,it is the client who controls the cost of any project. For example should we design a brick building that meets the budget and the City decided to change the facade to granite, the building will no longer be able to be built for the assigned budget. ffr David M.Schwarz Architectural Services.Inc.: 1133 Comeedcut Avenue.N.W..Suite Q00.Washington D.C.2 035 (202)562- r r GSi architects.Its.:Playtoese Square. 1240 Huron Road.C:evetaad.Ohio 441154702 (216)363.00co NOV. 19981 :4�PM A CHITEC UAL SERVICEpry • NO. 1733 P. 3 Mr.Curtis R Hawk 24 November 1998 . 0 Page 2 . We will agree to a cap on reimbursable costs pertaining to document reproduction(black and white),long distance telephone and facsimile charges,costs for postage and shipping(including courier services and overnight delivery),and costs associated with out-of-town travel based on a stipulated number of trips that we will agree to as part of our negotiation of an7.agreement with the City for design services. For a project of this type we estimate reimb sables to total no more than 10%;of the design+fee assuming that the reproduction costs associated with the During l n gof .. 't7. the phase are ha,�.dlP.�?by the[�'�. 1T3IIb o1r uL�L`iiati^via an agreement whit City we will agree to a more precise cap that is hopefully under our 10%estimate, and which will be F h f .tors t b } t l �.^viltliagitt i,S�iVll JL'at'ill La6.lVSJ art Ul�'i a-itltil=t�Gd Ul�iGetirlgS i21,�Ol![i11aKZ,the quantity of site visits during the construction phase, and anticipated level of document reproduction and distribution, in this regard, the City has as much control over reimbursable costs as the Deaign Team. if we arc selected for your project, Southlake Town Hall will be a high priority for our firms and we will work diligently and efficiently to ensure that our work is produced in a timely Manner and that we meet our schedule commitments. With respect to our scope of work,we believe the October 2000 occupancy date is achievable and will require cooperation and close coordination across the various disciplines responsible for design and construction. One of the first priorities will be forthe City to hir a CM who can develop a schedule that clearly identifies the critical tasks and milestone dates necessary for achieving your desired completion date.In addition, Owner decisions and reviews will also have to be provided in a timely manner so to avoid any delays. ilkWe hope that this response addresses the points raised in your letter. The So=uthlake Town Hall represents an exciting opportunity for our firms and we would look forward to the opportunity of working with the City of Sout lake. • Sincerely JJ) DAVI i M.SCHWARZ/ GSl AKLtfl i LCf S,INC, ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES,INC. By (--) By: I e ( / 1 J 1lJ1 / - -� David M. Schwarz St., --en. 7.Zaei�ss r+ _ President Principal enclosure NOV. 25. 1998 12:48PM ARCHI I EC I UAL SERVICE NO. 1738 F. 4 T H E AMERICAN 1 u S T 1 T U T E OF ARCHITECTS 0 47tilip ' Jv4 AIA Document 13141 Sin and Form of Agreement Beaten owner And Architect 1987 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. AGREEMENT made as of the day of in the year of Nineteen Hundred and lipBETWEEN the Owner: (Name and address) and the Architect: (Name and add ess) For the fallowing Project: (Include detailed description cj Project,tocatton. address and swteJ The Owner and Architect agree as set forth below. Copyright 1917.1926,1948,1951,1953,1958,1961,1963,/966.1967,1970,1974,1977.6I9c37 by TheAm^x^^1ns<lme cl A.ChitrctS,1735 7 vw York Avenue,Di.W., Washington,D.C.20006.Reproduction of the maternal herein or substantial 0 quotation of Its provisions without written permission of the AMA violates the ccpyrig u laws,sf the Wilted States ant wiii be subject to legal prosecution. Ala 0001.1=fr 8141+OvrNttA.ARCF117t t:r AGREEMENT•FOuRTEENTH EDITION•ALA' a @ ISO7 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OP ARC1'ITTECT$,1 715 n YORK AvE:UZ.rt.g,W*JHlr4GTON.D.C.20006 B141_1987 9 IVAI lNG:Unlicensed photocopying*Mom U.S.copyright irks acid in aft to lewd proaacudas. NOV, '?h. 1998 1?:4SP ARCHI I ECT UAL SERVICE N0. 1733 E. 5 • i I TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT 1 0 , 4 TT'J- ct ��i•�'S� 1 $;`..5."..'�5:.�or�"vrwu+iw Ta budget, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner,Ues1g1 Development tDocumer$ ARCPitTE* 'ee'S RESPONSIBILITIES consisting of drawings and other doe-nmezts to fix and describe 9.9 s 1 Tl_CT'�SERVICES the size and character of the Project a 0arcfltectu 1,srruc- rural, mechanical and electrical systems, materials and such 1.1.1 The Architect's services consist of those services per- other elements as may w appropriate. foamed by the Architect,Architects employees and Architect's 2.3.2 The Architect shall advise the Owner of any adjusrmeruS consultants as enumerated in Articles 2 and 3 of this Agreement to the p:,.l:.—t:.:..,:r estimate of wii5ir-UcttVn Cost. and any Other services included in Article 12. 1.1.2 The Architect's services shall be performed as expedi- `. i u'Ci,' c'DOCUMENTS PHASE tiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the _ orderly progress of the'work.Upon request of the Owner,the 2.4.1 Based on the approved Dcign Development Dom.,- Mrchitect shall submit tot-*he Owners approval a schedule for meals and any further adjustments in the scope or quality of the performance of the Architect's services which may be the Project or in the consst.n.ledon budget nuthoil ed by the adjusted as the Project proceeds, and shall include allowance Owner,the Architect shall prepare,fOrapprrevai by the Oar, for periods of time required for the Owner's review and for Cot+-sttuction Documents consisting of Drawings and Spe-ciBe;a- approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over dons setting forth in detail the re zuirem.nrc for the construe- the Project.Time bits established by this schedule approved don of the Project. by the Owner shall nor,creep:for reasonable cause,be exceeded 2.4.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner in the prep.aration Of by the Architect or Owner. the necessary bidding information, binding forms, the Cond. 1.1.3 The services covered by this Agreement arc subject to Lions of the Contract,nand the form of A teement between the the rime Limitations contained In Subparagraph 11.5.1. Owner and Contractor. 2_4.3 The Architect shall d the Ownerof anyadjustments 2 a..f:�fai, azlj ARTICLE 2 to previous preliminary estimates of Construction Cost indi- ALTE OF ARC S r EC i'S BASIC APRV ICPS cared by charges in requimrrient or general marker conditions. 2-4-4 The A chiteCr shall assist the Owner in conriection with laki 2.1 DEFINITION the Owner's responsibility for filing docurtlents required for 2.1.1 The Architect's Basic Services consist of those described the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction in Paragraphs 2.2 throughservices 2.6 and any other identified over the Project. in Article 12 as part of Basic Services,and include normal strue- rural, mechanical and electrical engineering services. 2.5 ssiDDINGG OR NEGOTIATION PHASE 2.2 SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 2.5.1 The Architect, following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents and of the latest preliminary estimate 2.2.1 The Architect shall review the program furnished by the C Caf Construction Cost,shall assist the Owner in obtaining bids Owner to ascertain the requirements of the Project an l shall or negotiated nronnsais and assist in awarding rind arrive at a mutual understandingOf such requirements with the �� preparing na,ner. � contracts for construction. 2.2.2 The Architect shall provide a preliminary evaluation of 2.6 CONSTRUCTION pig Ai3MINIS tTt.A O. the Owner's program, schedule and construction budget OF THE CONSTRUCTION COACT requirements;each in rennS of the other,subject to the limita- tions set forth in Subparagraph 5-2.1. 2,6.1 The Architect's responsibility to provide Basic Services for the Construction Phase under this Agreement commences 2.2,3 The Architect shall review with the Owner alterative with the award of the Contract for Construction and termi- approaches to design and construction of the Prof. mates at the earlier of the issuance to the Owner of the final 2,2.4 aced nn me mutually agreed-u n progru � schedule Certificate for Payment or 6.0 days after the dare of Subsc^an— f .. and construction budget requirements, the Architect shall tisl Completion of the'Work. prepare, for approval by the Owner, Schematic Design DO-co- 2.8.2 The A,-tiinw-r shs1I1 provide •l- udon of the Con- ments consisting of drawings and other documents illustrating tract for Construction as set forth below and in the edition of hand relationship of the scale Project components. itlA Document A201, General the foe �Andrtifln5 of Contract 2.2.6 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a preliminary Construction, current as of the date of this Agreement,unless estimate of Construction Cost based on current area,volume or otherwise pr07ided in this Agreement. t. other unit costs- 2.3.3 Duties,responsibilities and limitations of errhority of the $.� DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE written shall not be restricted,modified or extended without written agreement of the Owner and Architect with c nsei:of 2,3,1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents the Contractor, which consent shall not be unreasonably and any adjustments authorized by the Owner in the program, withheld Al..O wM6 IT 37ii a OOwN'ER.,iRCtiiTBC AoriEEl4ENT•FOURTEENTH soiTION•Audi • P1987 1111/1 >�1 1 19S7 Tar5 1S.�tSRm�,Ahl INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS.1735 NEW YOAA AVENUE_N�1V.,vvagHtNGToPi.D.C.20006 '�. wAr-iNiNce ttr,Picenseg primeopying Waimea U.S.cop/Tight laws and IS am,PJsct to legal preseeutf®rt. NOV. 25. 1 3 1`?:4 PM ARCHITECT T UAL SERVICE NO. 1 l3a R. 6 2.6.4 The Architect shall be a representative of and shall advise quantity of the`Voris,(2)reviewed constrricttn.rnm'2s,meth- . consult•with the Owner(1)during construction until foal t ds,techniques, Est s or procedures,(3) evl w r'copies payment to the Contractor is due,and(1)as an Additional Scr- of requisitions received from prose tractors and material sup- pliers and other data requested by the Owner to snbsvandettc merlon period described in the Contract for Construction.The the contractor's right to payment or(4)ascertained how or for Architect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid only to the extent provided in this Agreement unless otherwise on account of the Contract Sums. modified by written instrument. • 2,g,11 The Atcnkrect.shall have authority to;then;Work wthlc,5 2.6,5 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate does not conform to the Contract Documents.Whenever the to the stage of construction or as otherwise agreed by the Architect considers it necessary or advisable for implements-. Owner and Architect in writing to become� generally familiar (ion of the intent of the Contract Documents,the Architect will f r with the proc5s and quality of the Work oIk completed and to have ah;theri.j to require additional inspection or testing of the determine in general if the Work is being performed in a man- Work in accordance with the provisions §§,o�r the Contract Docu- ner indicating that the Work when completed will be in accor- ments, whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or dance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect completed.However,neither this authority of the Architect nor shall not be required to make exhaustive,or continuous on-site a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to e er- inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On else such authority shall give.rise to a duty or responiibiliit of the basis of on-site observations'as an architect, the Architect the Architect to the Contractor, Subcontractors, material and shall keep the Owner informed of the progress and quality of equipment suppiicts, their agents or employees or other pe- the Work, and shall endeavor to guard the Owner against sons performing portions of the Work. .c d f_i_nr;_ in the Work. ire .. L^3 and uL.a.u..a..a (More cis�atciy2 ,lire representation may be agreed to as an Additional Service, as 2.6.12 The Architect shall review and approve Or take ocher described in F agraph 3.2.) appropriate action upon Contractor's submitMts such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples,but only for the limited 2.6 .o The Architect shall not have control over or charge of purpose of checking for conformance with•u Lv'hYiivn given and shall not be responsible for Construction ea s,n etht...`, and the design concept expressed in me Contract Documents. techniques,sequences or procedures,or for safety precautions The Architect's action shall be taken with such reasonable and programs in connection with the Work, since these are promptness as to cause no delay in the Work or in the con- solely the Contractors responsibility under the Contract for straction of to Owner or of separate contractors,while allow- Comte-action. hall ino sufficient time in the Architect's professional nn The Architect shall not be IejpCJn57bie fUP the •^+� judgment to Contractor's schedules or failure to carry out the Work in seem- permit adequate ieviev,r Review of Such submittals is not con- dance with the Contract Documents. The Architect shall not dueled for the purpose of determining the accuracy and com- e--, have control over or charge of acts or omissions of the Conrrac- pieteness of other details such as dims ions and quantities or tor, Subcontractors, on their agents or employees, or of any a substantiating tt su tLuv.,S for installation or performance of other persons perform f g portions of t e Work, equipment or Systems dcsitelcCd by the Contractor,all of which, remain. the responsibility of the Contractor to the extent 2 8.7 The Architect shall at all times have access to the Work required by the Contract Do cumentss. The Architect's review wherever it is in preparation or progress. shall not constitute approval of safety precautions Or, unless • otherwise specifically stated by the Architect,of construction• 2.6.0 Except as may otherwise be'provided in the Contract means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. The Documents or when direct communications have been spe- Architect's approval Of a specific item shall not indicate csiliy auuh0nee i the Owner and Contractor stall communicate the of an assembly of which .hc item is a component. through the Architect.Communications by and with the A.IChi- When professional tr.-trifle-anon of jcrfVrat3HCe characteristics tcct's consultants shall be through the Architect. materials,systems or equipment is required by the Contract Documents,4f - `- - be -1 upon 0 J .L L_. the rchite.t shall entitled to rely upon such 2.6.3 Based on to Architect's observa+rions and evaluations of cerilficatlon to establish that the materials, systems or equip- the Contractor's Apphicauoos for Payment,the Architect smell man will meet the performance Criteria required by the Con- review and certify the amounts due the Contractor. , ct Docu;Y . 2.6.0 The Architect s certification for payment shall corn"G- 2.6.13 The Architect shall prepare Change Orders and Con- cute a representation to the Owner, based on the Architect's $traction Change Directves, with supporting doeunienration observations at the site as provided In Subparagraph 2.6.5 and and data if,seemed rie_ceecary by the Architect as provided in on the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Pay- subparagraphs 3.1.1 and 3.3.3, for the Owner's approval and mcnt,that the Work has progressed to the point indicated and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents, and that,to the best of the Architect's knowledge,information and may authorize minor changes in the Work not involving an bdfie%gtraiity of the Work is in accordance with the Contract in.,a _ e Augment.a..,a�.�,C:at^,^aa^,r Sum Or an extension of the Contract Documents. The foregoing representations are subject to an Time which arc not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents. Documents upon Substantial Completion, to results of subse- Tient tests and inspections.to minor deviations from the Con- 2,$,14 The Architect sh0. conduct i'..SYections to determine tract Documents cOrrec abic prior to completion and to spe- the date or dates of Substantial Completion and the date of final ciftc qualifications expressed by the Architect.The issuance of a completion, shall receive and forward to Eric Owner for the Certificate for Payment shall further constitute a representation Owner's review and records written warranties and related that the Contractor is entitled to pa ent in the mount certi- documents is required by the Contract Documents a ,,wym„na u � `� :;t.... w,+aa.wa end ass2au- fled. However. the issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall bled by the Contractor,and'halJ issue a final Certificate for Pay- not be a representation that the Architect'has(1)made cxhaus- ment upon compliance with the requirements of the Contract rive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality ortip Documents. .fit,A•. r,IZ v t iilrITtCT AGREEMENT 0oila'r even. t�rvr,�.A.�. li= � `�fdw�•ArAae, ar..., nv.�ir.,+aa.,•a a vuwa ee+v.n 2utTiuA'�Ain' +Qh� 3 �4��-� � s q� ririme,AMtRICAN IIN�STITUTE OF AACHFTECTS,1735 NTT YORK YENUZ.N.T..vwitist`ti'da OTON.D.0 20 i W nethendi onricari5�^tl inhataW crying violator,;IS.cciri'gt'rght it vo and Ls auiiiset to legal ptm-'2otibct. Fr NOV. 25. 199E 12:50PMi ARCIHI I EC I UAL SERVICE NO. 173E F. 7 2.6.i5 Tile Architect shah interpret and decide matters con- 32.3 Through the observations by such Project 1epressen- 0 cerning performance of the Owner and v^..nazetvr tiro the natives, Architect shallv r to provide h� r rA requirements of the Contract Documents on written request of tion for the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work. either the Owneror Contractor. The Architect's response to but the furnishing of such project representation shall nor such requests shall be made with reasonable promptness and modify the righrs,responsibilities Or obligations of the Architect within any time limits agreed upon. as described elsewhere In this Agreement. 2. .13 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect than be • 3.3 CONTINGENT ADDITIONAL SERVICES i onsitrent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract DocL'nen s anrl.shail be in writing or in the form of a3.3.1 making reviWris in ur-awirip, Spcc3ucatarxu or other drawing. When makings such interpretations and initial dent- nnocuments when such revisions ons are: sions, the Architect shall endeavor to sect re faithful perfor- mance by both Owner and Contractor,snail not show partiality .1 inconsistent with approvals or instructions previously to either,and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or given by the Owner,including revisions made neces- decisions so rendered in good faith, sary by adj isrrnents i_n the Owner's proms or Proj- ect budget; 2.6.1 I The Architect's decisions on matters relating to aestiie- _ h al i co. Pet_ the ex 2 requited bythe enactment or revision of codes,laws ticP4fP/'r a all he fins it r n,C„iCf„ r with inrrnr nwecpri in the Contract Doti m.nts. or regulations subsequent to the prep-aration of such documents;or 2,8_14 The Architect shall render written der5eionS within a reasonable time on all claims,disputes or other matters in clues- .3 due to changes required as a result of the Owner's fail- tion between the Owner and Contractor relating to the execu- acre to render decisions in a timely manner. don or progress of the Work as provided in the Contract Documents. 3.3.2 Providing services required rred because of significnt T'c changes in the Project including.but not limited to,size,gt;at- 2.b.19 The Architect's decisions on claims, disputes or other icy, complexity,the Owner's schedule, or the method of bid- matters, including those in question between the Owner and ding or negotiating and contracting for construction;except for Contractor,except for those relating to aesthetic effect as pro- under c..a__..�__ -r vided in Subparagraph 2.6.17,shall be subject to arbitration as s2r—sit C$required ursyca 7uvYas a�tapia�j.:.�. provided in this Agreement arid in the Contract Documents. 3.9.3 Preparing Drawings,Specifications and other documen- tatlon and supporting data, evaluating Contractor's proposal;, and providing other services in connection with Change 3;nT;CLL'a Orders a Construction Change Directives. Di ION- ------- -- and 3.3.4 Providing see`is Sin connection with evaluating cubs'- , it tutions proposed by the Contractor and maidaig subsequent 3.1A..1 revisions to Drawings,Sperihetions and other documentation resulting therefrom. 33,1.1 The services dcscr'ii3ed in this article 3 are not iriduded in Raair c unless cn irl n t ed in rn£IP 1 7 and they.ch 3•3_5 Providing consulmtiOn GOt eerning replacement of Work r___Servile_ . e.t _A di _ al! damaged by fire or other cause during construction, and fur- ue paid for by the Owner as provided In this Agreement, in ,, ,� _,,o-- additiOn to the compensation for&tile Services. The services TtiaisfIig se,-vices siyiata�is in wAnw.io:.with t:. replacement described under Paragraphs 3.2 and 3.4 shall only be provided of such Work. if authorized or confrnied in writing by the Owner.u ser v icw v' try ctn.-fault of the ''i.j.a`� Providing services made necessary try the d:.tauu the ¢ecribcd under Contingent Additional Services in Paragraph contractor,by major defects or deefciencies in the Work of the 3-3 arc required due to circumstances beyond the Architect's Contractor,or by failure of performance of either the Owner or control, the Architect shall notify the Owner prior to coral- Contractor under the Contract for Construction. oiencing such softies.if the Owner deems that such services described under D.rsg..anh 3.3 are not required, the (1 services wrier 3.3.7 Piovidirig sery LA evaluating art extensive number of shall Rive prompt written notice to the Architect.If ti-. Owner clams submitted by the Contractor or others in connection indictees in writing that all or part of such Contingent Addi- with the Work. clonal Services arc not required,the Architect shall have no ail- 3.3.E Providing service in connection with a public heating, gallon to provide those services. arbitration proceeding or legal proceeding except where the 3.2 PROJECT REPRESENTATION i3EYONO 'BASIC Architect is party thereto. SERVICES 3.3.9 Preparing documents for alternate,separate or sequential bidding,3.2.1 If more e_xten'ssive representation at the site th_'l.St. IS b Or providing services in connection withu3wrusg,;2 vu:- described in Subparagraph 2.6.5 is required,the Architect shall don or constriction prior to the completion of the Construe- provide one or more Project Representatives to assist in caa cry don Documents Phase. irkg ore such additional on-site responsibilities. 3,4 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.2.2 PrOject Representatives shall be selected,employed and directed by the Architect., and the Architect shall be compen- 3.4.1 Providing analyses of the Owner's needs and progra'n- sated therefor as agreed by the Owner and Architect. The ming the regiurements of the Project. duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of Project 3.4.2 Providing financial feasibility or other special studies. Representatives shall be as described in the edition of AlA Document B352 current as of the date of this."a--cenent,unless 3.4.3 Providing prat'».iang surveys, sire evaluations or coin- otherwise agreed. parstive studies of prospective sites. ALA DOCUMENT 9141 •O''NER•ARCNITFCT AGREEMENT•PoljRTeNrti FDITION•AIA® • i•J i 987 ma AZ.tERiCA INSrt i t era or Aacrirra�:t S,i 735 maw Yoarr AVENUEE.N.`Y, _.i.r,1ANGT^N,D.C.aeo0.F B141-1987 4 WARNING:Unlicensed pholccopying virdoteo U.S.cvpyri9M laws end iss subject to ieso4➢+eaucii4ior+- NOV. ? , 1�� 1E: 1FNl ARCHITECIUAL SERVICE • NO. 1738• P. 8 3-4-4 Providing special surveys, environmental studies and 4.2 The Owner shall establish and update art overall budget for 111/ aubmicaions re:wiped for appro "also go%cmmeen �""_s•S f wl ai,u,uiiuca the Protect,including the Construction Cost,the Owner's otheror others having jurisdiction over the?Tojccr_ costs and reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. 3.4.5 Providing-services relative to future facilities, syst nits 4 3 if requesYcd by the Architect,the Owner shall furnish evi- and equipment. (knee that financial arrangements have been made to fulfill the 3.4.3 srO nuns services to investigate misting condidons Or Owner's obligations under is Agreement. fatalities or to make measured drawings thereof. drawings 4.4 The Owner shall designate a mpsescnrauve authorized to 3.4.7 Providing services to'verify the accuracy of drawings or act on the owner's behalf with respect to the Project_ The other information.furnished by the Owner or such authorized representative shall render decisions �Owner. ill a timely manner pertaining to docttmenrs submitted by the 3.4.8 Providing coordination of construction performed by Architect in order to avoid unr -noor.able delay in the orderly se ante contractors or by the Owner's own forces and Cisotdi- and sequential proRre$S Of the Architect's services. nation of services required in connection with commie:iorr performed and equipment supplied by the Owner. 4.5 The Owner shall furnish surveys describing physical cltaractrristics,legal limitations and utility locations for the site 3.4.3 Providing services in connection with the wort ofa con- of the Project, and a written legal description of the site_The struction manager or separate consultants retained by the surveys and legal information shall include, as applicable, Owner. grades and lines of streets, alleys, p%a:.:auv:aau and adjoining 3.4.10 Providing detailed estimates of Construction Cast, property and structures: adjacent drainage; rights-ofway, restrictions, easements, encoachrrments, zoning, deed rFstric= 3.4.11 providing derailed quantity surveys or inventories of dons, boundaries and contours of the site; locarlons, dimar material,equipment and Labor. lions and necessary data pertaining to existing buildings,other i_T_provemen_ts and trees;and inforrnatlon concerning available 3.4.12 Providing analyses of owning and operating costs• c utility services and lines, both public and private, above and 3.4.13 Providing interior design and other similar services below grade,including inverts and depths.Aft the information required for or in connection with the selection,procurement on the survey shall be referenced to a project benchmark. or installation of furniture, furnishings and related equipment_ 4.5 The Owner shall furnish the services of oeotu fhnicai Goo- 3.4.14 Providing services for planning tenant or rental spaces_ racers when such torte are retgtre ted by the Architect.Such 3.4.15 Making investigations, invennories of materials or equip- services may include but are not limited to rest borings, rest merit,or valuations and detailed appraisals of existing facilities. pits, determinations of soil 'Dewing values, percolation tests, evaluations of ha aMous materWs,ground corrosion and resis- t-_— 3,4,15 Preparing a set of reproducible record drawings show- tivity tests.Includine necessary Operations for anticipating sub- ing significant changes in the Work made during construction soil conditions, with repot and appropriate prof sional I based on marked-up prints,drawings and other data furnished recommendations. h)y the Contractor to the Architect. 4.8.1 The Owner shall furnish the services of other co sui- 3.4.17 Providing assistance In the utilization of equipment or rants when such services are reasonably required by the scope rpreparation Of of the Project and are requested by the Architect. S r..'tt,^P.S�SLr..h as resting,.p,adjusting and li..l�'ia:litg> operation and maintenance manuals: training personnel for 4.7 The Owner shall furnish structural,meclIzn ,chemical. operation and maintenance,and consultation during operatiom• air and water pollution tests,rests for hazardous materials,and 3.4.18 Providing services after issuance to the Owner of the other laboratory and cnvi onment l rests, inspections and final Certificate for Payment,or in the absence of a final ter- reports required by law or the Contract Documents. mutate fur Payment, more titan 60 days after the date of Sub- srantial Completion of the Worn. 4.3 The Owner shall furnish all legal,accounting and Insurance 3.4.19 Providing services of consultants for other than archi- counseling services as may be necessary any time for the Project, including auditing services the Owner may require to teen:ra., s roe, mechanicalom and elecuicai engineering pot- verify the Contractor's Appiicaorts for Pa ment or to ascertain dons of the Project provided as a past of Basalt Services. how or fot what ousuose s the Contractor has used the money 3.4.20 Providing any other services nor otherwise included in paid by or on behalf of the Owner. this Agreement or.not customarily Famished In accordance with generally accepted architectural practice. CO The service,information,surveys and tenons required by Paragraphs 4.5 through 4.8 shall be furnished at the Owner's expense, and the Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completenes.s thereof. ARTICLE 4 4.10 Prompt written notice shall be given by the Owner to the Architect if the Owner becomes aware of any fault or defect in OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES the Project or:orco:fortnanCe with the Conn-net ancninerns. 4.1 The Owner shall provide full information regarding 4.11 The proposed language of certificates or cer endons requirements fist the Project,including a program which shall requested of the Architect or Arrhin is consultants shall be eobjectives,schedullo w train.rand for forth the Owner's schedule,cos.Qi..t, cri- s.ibmitled to the Architect.or review and approval at least 14 - terh, including space requirements and relationships, Read- days prior to execution,The Owner shall riot request certifies- batty, expandability, special equipment, systems and site dons that would require knowledge or services beyond the requirements. scope of this Agreement. ALA oonOtr EhT Sidi -o'2`,rgli. iti ltfreCT soot a'aariT o rouir twin rotrION•Ftifs a 156-7 5 B141-19E17 THE iiI.M. CAI4 INSTITUTE or aticilliECTS,1733 NEW YORK,.VENUE.tv. ., 5 m:GT:3N.D.C.2iaX>6 WAAN O:Unlicensed photocopying Adam US.copyright ions and is mugger.en 4S9 4 ion- NOV, ?�. 1998j?: 1 FN1 ARCHI T ECTIIAL SERVICE NO. 1738 AR?lC.E 5 .3 if the Project is abandoned, terminate in accordance with0 Paragraph 8.3;or ' l�IIST�?i;'L�J''t3!d COST .a cooperate in revising the Project scope and quality as 5.1 !�i'ss'i'ta.l�lt✓I� ---1. ...,to r"�'••"-the Construction iori Cost u,r 5.2.5 if the Owner chooses to proceed under Clause 5.2.4.4, 5.1.1 'the Construction Cost shall be the total cost Or esti- the aJthiteecr,without:wdiwd3-u u'17tic,snail tnodiry the Con- mated cost to ice owner of all elements of the Project designed tract Documents as neCes a y to comply with the�i ed il,.n t,if ors d led by the rchitect. established as a c�ndivan of this Agreement.The modification 5.1.2 The CAnstrucdon Cost shall include the cost at current of Contract Documents shall be the limit of the Arrdlitcct's market rates of labor and materials furnished by the Owner and responsibility arising out of the estebiishment of a fixed limit, equipment designed spedficd, selected or specially provided The Az chance.than be entitled to compensation in accordance for by the Architect,plus a reasonable allowance for the Con- with this Aiitreement for all services pertbrmed whether or not tractor's overhead and profit. In addition. a reasonable chow- the Construction Phase.is commenced. Inge for coretegencies shall be included for market conditions at the tine of bidding and for changes in the Work during construction. ARTICLE G 5,1.3 Construction Cost does not include the compensation of USE OF ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS, the Architect and Architect's consultants,the costs of the land, SPECIFICATIONS AND O T meta DOWNER-1$ rights-of-way, financing or other costs .which are the,respon• sibility of the Owner as provided in Article 4. 6.1 The Drawings, Specifications and ocher eloomicnts pre- 5.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST pared by the Architect far this Project are ins me.rts of the Architect's service for use solely with respect to this Project $.2,i Evaluations of the Owner's P.oe..:s budget,prelir",irr ry and,unle.ss otherwise provided,the Architect ebeli be deemed estimates of Construction Cost and detailed estimates of Oen- the author of theCe doct mzits and shall retain ail common law, struction Cost,if any,prepared by the Architect, represent the statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright_ Architect's best judgment as a design professional randier with The Owner shall be permitted to retain copies,including repro.. the construction industry.it is recognized,however, that net- ducibie copies,of the Architect's Drawings.Specifications and ther the Architect nor the Owner has control over the cost of other documents for iufotmaaon and reference in connection labor, materials or equipment,over the Contractor's methods with the Owner's use and occupancy of the Project.The Aerchi- of determining bid prices,or over competitive bidding,market recta Drawings,Seet.ifction3 or other documents shall eat be or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the Architect cannot used by the Owner or others on other projects,for additions to and does not we ant or represent that bids or negotiated prices this Project or for completion of this Project by others,unless tt �.it idge . k ninny ,,...this will not vary from the Owner's Project budeac or Ilona any the RSs.,h:.ect is_»,L..b,.,..a....in..- u!t u;,.....u..�Afy.��nz<.t, estimate of Construction Cost or evaluation prepared or agreed except by agreement in wriring and with appropriate compen- to by the Architect compen- sation to the Architect. 5.2.2. No fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be established 6.2 Submission of distribution of documents to meet offlci i as a condition of this Agreement by the furnishing,proposal or reguletory requirements or for similar purposes in coenection stabliehment of a Project budget. unless such fisted limit has with the Project is not to be construed as publication In deroge- been agreed upon in writing and signed by the parties hereto.If lion of the Architect's reserved rights. such a fixed limit has been established, the Architect shall be permitted to include contingencies for design, bidding and price escalation,to determine what materials,equipment,com- ponent systems and types of construction•re to be included in the Contract Docurez.its, to matte reasonable adjustments in ARTIC1,2 7 the scope of the Project and to include In the Contract Doeu- ARBITRATION s rnen hltes natc bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the fixed limit.Fixed Limits,if my,shall be increased in the amount of an increase in the Contract Sum occurring after execution of the pa Claims, Agreement tree eo other matters in tqeleting o this A the Contract hot CorlStr_�L�on. patties to this Agccmcrft arising our of of re3atirg to this Agree- Contract or breach thereof shall be subject to and decided by arbi- 6.2.3 If the Bidding or Negotiation Phase has riot commenced merlon in accordance with the Construction Industry Ar'uuPa- within 90 days afterthe Architect submits the Commotion On Rules of the Alnericart Arbitration Association currently in Documents to the Owner,any Project budget or fixed limit of effect unless the panties mutually agree otherwise. Construction Cost shall be adjusted to reflect changes in the 7.2 Deuraiid fur arbitration shall be filed in writing with the eenetel level of prices the A a f the wren:thorn industry between the aches party to s elate of subraisson of the Construcdon Documents to thethisigrr.rtievtandatwitAmerican A antra don Association.A demand for erbitratloa shall be made within Owner end the date on which proposals are sought. a reaonable time cruel -u`rc claim, dispute Or other matter in 5.2.4 If a fixed limit of Construction Cost (adjusted as pro- question has arisen In no event shall the demand for arbitration Ailed in 5ubpAregsaph 5.2.3)is exceeded by the lowest bona be made aver the date when institution of legal or equitable fide bid or negotiated proposal,the Owner shall: proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in .1 give written approval of an increase in such fixed question would be barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. limit; 7.3 No arbitration arising our of or relating to this Agreement 2 authorize rebidding or reriegct ri g of the Project shall include,by consolidation,joinder or in any other mariner. anthill a t citable time; an additional person or entity notpartythis Agr , a � to tcmcnt Ale :W K10141 •OWWBA AacHITECr AQt men—4 FOt7AT¢retr ai EtoirtON A Alt® 4.949ee lif° TJ4Pt 4E�RICANWS-mul OPeaC:ttrrECr5.1735leeayoRKA:13ytta,tint.,WAsxnroecei,o.c.eceee ii149-1 I3? 3 V N;Nc:unlicensed photocopying vlalaree U.S.cergrignt tears and Is ambient to terms pros euaat. NOV. 25. 199 12:52PM ARCHITECTUAL SERVICE • MO. 173S P. 10 except by written consent containing a specific reference to .2 Ten percent of the total Compensation for Basle and this g ement sib by the Owner,Architect,and any other Additional Sctvicrs earned to due if vermin ion 0 person Or entity sought to be joined. Corwe_^.t to arbitration occurs during the Design Development Phase:Or 9 involving an C diticral p`teen or cherry shalt nor constitute Five percent of the total compensation for cause and consent to arbitration of any claim,dispute or other matter in Additional Services earned to .re- if teen:ip:^.or. question not described in the written consent or with a person or entity not named or described therein.The fo�m a- occurs during any sszbscgttctt phase. • i3�"' • merit to arbitrate and other agreements to arbitrate with an additional person or entity duly consented to by the parties to Atli-IDLE this Agreement Shah be specifically enforceable in accordance with applicable law in any court havingjurisdiction thereof. j MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 7.4•The award rendered by the arbitrator or arbitrators shall be finite and judgriii ens may be entered upon it in accordance with 9.1 Unless otherwise provided, this Agreement shall be gov- apoiicablc law in any court having I-mi`t-ne i rt thereof. erned by the law of the principal place of business of the Architect. 4.2 Terms in.this Agreement shall have the sante n-e=i'-igg as aR1[e�° ® those in A]A Document A201. General Conditions of the Con- . .. • . tract for Construction,current as of the date of this geerrnent. TEIRMINATION,SUSPENSION OR.ABANDONMENT 9.3 Canc.-5 of action between the patties to this Agreement 8.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon penafnnt to acts or failures to act shall be deemed to have Sint less than seven days'written notice should the other parry accrued and the applicable Mutes of limitations shall eom- fail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms Of this Potence to tutu not later than either the dart of Substantial Corry A^ rent tiro ugyb no fault of the party initiating the termination, p!etion for acts or failures to act occurring prior to Su,start I Completion,or the date of issuance of the final Certificate for U.2 If the Project is suspended by the Owner for more than 30 Payment for acts or failtiew to act occurring after Substantial consecutive drys,the Architect shall be compensated for sere Completion. vices performed prior to notice of such suspension.When the Project i3 resumed, the Architect's compensation than be coot. 9.4 The Owner end Architect waive ant rights a airtst each [ably adjusted to provide for expenses incurred In the interrup other and against the contractors, consultants: agents and extent and resumption of the Architect's services- employees of Inc other fur damages,but only to the cov- ered by property insures'e during commie ion, except such 6..3 This Agreement may be terminated by the Owner upon rights es they may have to the proceeds of such insurance as set _ not less than seven days' written notice to the Architect in the forth in the edition of AI 1 Document A201,General Conditions event that the Project permanently abandoned.If the Project of the Contract for Construction,current as of the date of this Is abandoned by the Owner for more than 90 consecutive dines, Agreement.The Owner and Architect each shall require simile the Architect may terminate this Agreement by giving written waivers from their contractors,consultants and agents. notice. � • • 9.5 The Owner and Architect, respectively, bind themselves, 0.4 Failure of the Owner to make payments to the Architect in their partners, successors,assigns and legal representatives to accordance evih this Agreement shall be considered substantial the other party to this Agreement and to the partners,eucces- nonperformance and cause for termination. t sots.assigns and legal representeti res of such ocher party with 8.3 if the Owner fails to makepayment when due the Arctii- respect to all covenants-of this Agreement Neither Owner nor e.chitecr Sian essign ctu.s Agee—merit without the written con. test for services and expenses, the Architect may,upon seven sent of the other. days'writ=notice to the Owner,suspend performance of ser- vices under this Agreement. Unless payment in full is received 9.6 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agree- by the Architect within seen days of the date of the notice,the merit between the Owner and Architect and supersedes all suspension shall take effect without further notice.in the event prior negotrarions, representations or agreements, either writ- of a suspension Of services,the Architect shall have no liability ten or oral This Agreement may be amended only by written to the Owner for deley or damage caused the Owner because instrument Signed by both Owner and Architect. of such suspension of services. 9.7 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contrec- a a Le. the event of termination not the fault of the Architect, tuai relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior party ayeinst either the Owner or Architect. to termination,together with Reimbursable E tp..roses then due 9.3 Unless otherwise rovided in this eement,tfie Architect and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paraereph 8.7, p and Architect's consulter es shah,have no r orsibiliey for the 8.7 Termination Expenses are in addition to compensation for discovery,presence,handlin,removal or disposal of or ietpo- Basic and Additional Services,and include expenses which are sure of persons to hazardous materials in any form at the Projocr directly attributable to termination.Termination Expenses shall site. including but not limited to asbestos, asbestos products, be computed as a percentage of the total compensation for polythlorinazed biphenyl(rt.or or other meat substances. Basic Services and Additional Services earned to the time of ter- mination,as follows: 9.9 The Architect shall have the right to include represents- tiOds of the design of the Project,including photographs of the .1 Twenty percent of the total compensation for Basic exterior and interior, attiOt'g the Architect's promotional and and Additional Services earned to date if tcrtninadten professional materials. The Architect's materials shall hoc lipoccurs before or during the preciesign,site analysis,or Include the Owner's Confidential or proprietary information if Schematic Design Phases; or the Owner has previously advised the Architect in writing of AID DOCu 8141 6 0 aster-ARcij TECT AGRU ENT•Fot,-itT�et t cot aN•ALAI a 01987 ����`�J87 THE AibiEAiCAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1734 NEW Yo[tKAv[xtg,Kam,WASISSN4TON,D.C.30006 WARNING:uniicenee9 pnototapying vld®tes U.S.ropyrtght imtiro this!It uk.Lelect t?kV pro€ 2tct. IVUV. n. 191 11'h3F ( 1ItiUAL ti{V1l,t • V. I LA r. II the specific information considered by the Owner to be confi- 10.3 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF a.4.ste EMIVIIIM. deatiai or proprietary. The Owner shall provide professional 41 credit for the Architect on the constriction sign and in the pro- 10. Au initial peer i2ni a set forth in Paragraph 11.1 i5 the motional material for the project. minimum payment under this Agreement. 10.3.2 Subsequent paycneriLs for Basic Services shall be made monthly anti, where applicable. Sheri be in paopozuon to set- . ARTICLE 10 vices performed within each phase of service,on the basis set forth in Subparagraph 1122. P, vgti-NT_Tv THE ARCHITECT 10.3.3 If and to the extent that the time initially established in 10.1 DIREST PERSONNELEXPENS E Subparagaph I1.5.I of this-i.gteernent is exceeded or extended through no fault of the Architect, compensation for any see 10.1.1 Direct Personnel Exp+eense is tented as the direct vices rendered during the gi,riitiOrlal period of time shall be salaries of the Architect's personnel engaged on the Project and computed in the manner set forth in Subparagraph 11.3.2. the portion of the cost of their mandatory and customary con- ttibu[ior7s and benefits related thereto, such as employment 10.3.t 'Then compensationti is based on a percentage of Con- tributions and other statutoryc-- sum-Jon Cost 2nd any portions of the Project u2i2L"cd or employee benefits, insurance, sick otherwise not constructed,compensation for these portions of leave, vacations, pensions and similar_io.^.tzib:caw the Project shall be payable to the extent services arc per- and benefits. formed on those portions,in accordance with the schedule set forth in Subparagraph 11.2.2.bused on(1)the lowest bona fide 10.2 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES bid or negotiated o� Asa,or(2)if � i g- no such bid or p vI Fiwal is 10.2-1 Reimbursable Expznsia are in addition to compensa received,the most recent preliminary c rlmate of Construction • don for Basic and Additional Services and include czpenses Cost or derailed admire of Ct+ti?Ln.iCticstt Cost for such pot*- incurredby the Architect a Architect's employees and Con dons of the Project. and sultants in the interest of the Project,as identified in the follow- 10.4 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF AOOITIONAL ing Clauses. SERVICES 10.2.1.1 c of transportationaccounttheArchitect'sAd ditional in connection with the 10.4.1 Payments 4r1 of Project; expenses in connection with authorized out-of-town Services and for Reimbursable Expenses shall be made monthly travel;long-distance Communications;and feu paid for secur- upon pruensation of the Architect's statement of services ten- ing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. tiered or expense;incurred, 10 2_1.2 Expense of reproductions, postage and handling of 10.5 P2eYttiE f5% iT) *1ELO Drawings.Specifications and other documents. 1 0.5.1 No deductions shall be made front the Architect's corn- 102.1,3 If authorized in 2dvancc by the Owner, expense o` pensation on account of penalty,liquidated damages or other ill, overtime work requiring higher than regular carat e sums wit.,l-,cld from payments to contractors,or on account of 10.2.1.4 Expense of renderings,models and mock-up req the cost of changes in,the Work other than those for which the by the Owner. Architect hz been found to be Iiable. 10.2.1.5 Expense of additional insurance coverage of limits 10.6 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING M C r+DS ARCHITECT'S av Vvr�®erw rta: • including professional liability insurance, requested by the Owner in excess of that normally carded by the Arthitet't and 1g 1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and expenses per - Owner ct5rvzlltartts, mining to Additional Services and services performed on the basis of a multiple of Direct Personnel Expense shall be avail- 10.2.1.6 Expense of computer-aided design and drafting able to the Owner or the Owner's authorized representative at equipment time when used in connection with the Project. mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 11 BASIS OF COMPENSATION The Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: 11.1 AN'rr'r mAL PAYMENT of Dollars($ ) snail be made upon execution of this Agreement and credited to the Owner's account at final payment 11.2 BASIC COMPENSATION 11.2.1 FOR BASIC SERVICES.IS decrrihed In Article 2,and any other services included in Artick 12 as pert of Basic Services,Basle Compensation shrill be computed as follows; (Ira rt eases of come cnsaton, inctitdltgf sr/pillow sums,nutlipfea or ,pease ua.ms a.id idlenr .phtttta:6.a4e*.4 par ticatar mestaar u3 con p radon vgty. if Beams;try,) NA DOOM=p141 a OWNER-ARCHITECT AOREs item a PcuRT£rnri l rat iT1GN s dine 'cb1987 ( THE A 42RlCar!fiver TJTE OF ARCtiFre rS.173511EW YORK AVENUE.N.W..WASHINGTON.O.C-20006 B14t.faa7 8 l( :VA.-IMAM:tirittmer.ed photaeofariag violates ti3.copyright tires aim is euitject to Iegai pros cgtion. N�V. 25. 1�95 1 :�4FM ARCHITECTUAL SERVICE NO. 173a P. 12 11.2.2 Where compensation is based on a stipulated sum or percentage of Construction Cost,proms payments for Basic Services in each phase shall total the following perccntagrs of the total BaStc Compensation payable; (insert additional pauses as appropriate.) Schematic Design.Phase: percent( %) Design Dt Yuopmcui.Phase: percent( %) Construction Documents Phase: percent( °la) Bidding or Negotiation Phase: percent( %) Construction Phase: percent( %) Total Basic Compensation: one hundred percent(100%) 11.3 COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES 11.3.1 FOR PROJECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES,as described In Patgraph 3.2,compensation shall be com- puted as follows: 11.3.2 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF THE ARCHITECT,as described in Articles 3 and 12,other than(I)Additional Project Representation, as described in Paragraph 3.2, and(2)services included in Article 12 as part of Basic Services, but excluding services of consultants, compensation shalt be computed as follows: (insen 1,4.$i$of compensat(nn,!nm(udins rams andiar multiples of Direct Personnel Expense,foe Principals and employees.and laent(f4 Print pate and tlasc(fy omolovees.!f rzga.rcd,fii..nttfy cpccific serrkes ro,.,gts ^^rric iar,gemo:14 fir.f.,_...-r--.«;ion applys;e ss.^. ) !It) 11.3.2 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANTS, i&lu ling additional ctrtctural, rseeha'scal and electrical engineering Services and those ptovided under Subparagraph 3.4.19 or identified in Article 12 as part of Additional Services, a multiple of ( )times the amounts billed to the Architect for such services. • (1 eru(fy specific types of consedranr3 in Article 12. If requir`d.) 11.4 FIEI°.sr'Ba'+'A L' 2 EXPENSES 11.4.1 FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES,as described in Paragraph 10.2,and any other items included in Article 12 as Rdmbursable rExpenses,a multiple of ( - )times the s cpenses incurred by the Architect,the Architect's employees and Consultants in the interest of the Project. 11.5 AP I T IO:AL PROVISIONS 11.5.1 IF THE BASIC SERVICES coveted by this Agreement have not been compl.r'et within ( )months of the date hereof,through no fault of the Architect.extension of the Architect's services beyond that time shall be compensated as provided in Subparagraphs 10.3.3 and 11.3.2. 11.5.2 Payments are due and payable ( ) days from the date of the Architect's invoice. Amounts unpaid ( )days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the Late entered below.or in the absence thereof at the legal rite prevailing from time to time at the petard place of business of the 9Schirect l;,i-n rea,of Intartmt aiyn..,cd upon.) (`va'OO'laid and rggairtmpus under the Cedara(Trudy in L ndb(Q Acz rbarlar rtala azta local coiuwa 'credit taus and arbor ovulations at die dmrier''S and Archi- r r loci s pnncipat pates of bw:ncrs,Of location of the Project anel elsetv$sre m4y aft ire!ual(dtry of this prevision.S ecylc!et adcs told be°brained wee: rttspett to aelerioes Or modifications,and also regarding'vat:irtme ds,udi as written disclosures or utatuees} 110 1!I, L. A3''.tOI UMW 6141 0 G`w"Naa-fiscgl1TECT AGRZEr4EX'vT a tOtriirsEartH EDITION ALA: •01� 9 9141.1997 THE AMERICAN iLSsrrrt,'TE OF ARCHITECTS.1735 New YORK AVENUt.NV:,Wti,SNTNGTOt t,D.C.20006 1 wARlt'a`.ee un'i`...artseo phut iierpir.0 miaus 113.ecityright la-AG Said IS Dui ec.to ivgidi f 34 cuvoi1. P!VCity of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Ron Harper, Deputy Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Conditional Sign Permit for Town Square On several occasions over the past several months, staff has informed City Council that the Developer of Town Square would be submitting a comprehensive sign request based on the unique aspect of Town Square. Staff has previously mentioned that the discussion of these changes may require a separate work session. This work session may still need to be held; however, due to the need to address this issue in a timely manner staff feels that an initial discussion of the items and issues is warranted at this time. • The "downtown" nature of this project is not necessarily compatible with the existing sign ordinance for the City of Southlake. Attached is the Developer's Request for Approval of Sign Regulations for Southlake Town Square. During the approval process for Town Square "Typical Signage Location and Types" was approved. This sheet is shown as A-8 under Exhibit B. The Developer's proposal is in general conformance with the concepts shown on this sheet. The Developer has provided a matrix that outlines most of the variations of the proposed regulations with the existing sign ordinance. Charles Bloomberg has provided several additional comments relative to differences in the two regulations. In addition to Mr. Bloomberg's comments., there is an additional item that City Council needs to note: item 10 of the Developer's matrix discusses the maximum square footage of signs. The Developer is proposing that the maximum area be 1 square foot for every foot of frontage on a roadway, driveway and parking area. Current regulation allows for 0.75 square feet for every foot of frontage on a roadway. Signs are allowed on other frontage, but only in the amount of 25% of the roadway frontage sign. Mr. Bloomberg's memo also discusses the ability to grant a conditional sign permit for the project rather than specific sign variances for each sign. ill- H/rjh //A—/ City of Southlake, Texas 41) MEMORANDUM November 10, 1998 • TO: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety FROM: Charles Bloomberg, C. B. O., Plans Examiner SUBJECT: Southlake Town Square request for Conditional Sign Permit I received an application from Frank Bliss of Cooper and Stebbins for a conditional sign permit for the Southlake Town Square project. This appeal is captioned to apply to phase I.of the project, approximately 41 acres. Section 6 of the sign ordinance allows the City Council to grant a conditional sign permit as follows: SECTION 6 CONDITIONAL SIGN PERMIT A. GENERAL: Notwithstanding anything in this ordinance to the contrary, the erection of a sign or signs may be approved pursuant to this section under a conditional sign permit approved by the City Council. The purpose of this'section is to allow for a specialized review of signs which may not be appropriate generally without certain restrictions, but which, if controlled as to the number, size, height, color, location, lighting, or relation to adjacent properties, would promote the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Conditional permitting of signs shall not be based upon the content of the sign, but is intended to allow for the evaluation of the physical impact of the proposed sign on adjacent properties and to ensure adequate mitigation of potentially unfavorable factors, such as the number, size, height, color, location, lighting, and other potentially unfavorable impacts. B. APPLICATION: An application for a conditional sign permit shall be submitted to the Building Official and shall include all documents as required by Section 4 of this ordinance. Additionally, the applicant shall submit construction plans drawn by a registered professional engineer or architect in the State of Texas and also provide renderings of the particular sign types, facades, materials, compositions, dimensions, lighting, and colors. The application book provided by Town Square is quite thorough in comparing their proposed i-� regulations to the present sign ordinance. Note the five-page table under the tab SUMMARY. I would offer the following additional comments under the column, "Current (Sign Ordinance 704)": 1. :'Awning signs are treated as Attached Signs and are therefore limited by the rule of one attached sign per lease space. - - / /g-� Conditional Sign Permit 4111 November 10, 1998 • ler Page 2 2. Blade signs are undefined and therefore prohibited. 3. A Fascia Sign would correspond to an Attached Sign in our ordinance. 4. Second story lease spaces are not permitted signs unless there is an exterior entrance on that level. See illustration in Appendix B of the ordinance.. 5. Window signs are limited to 15% of the glass area, not 50% as indicated. 6. Temporary signs on construction barricades are classified as development signs and are therefore limited to one per site and require a permit. Please schedule this item for the December 1, 1998 City Council meeting. CB/cb • _ _ _ // ,2 3 City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM November 25, 1998 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Chris Carpenter, Senior Comprehensive Planner (for) Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Entry Portal Concept Development at entry points into the City of Southlake As you may recall, the Southlake Corridor Study adopted in August of 1995 recommended entry portals at several entry points into the city. Schematically the locations for these portals were shown on Figure 1-Portal Plan, (attached as page 7 of 7)from page 6 of the study. Although we have been working on various aspects of the Corridor Study recommendations (recommended plant palette, demonstration site conceptual development,urban design enhancements for SH 114, etc.)we have also been working on conceptual ideas for the entry portals, as well as communicating the need for land to developers and land owners in critical locations. The purpose of this memo is to begin discussions regarding our desires on the entry portals in order to be timely in our implementation of these important features for the city. r BACKGROUND As mentioned,the adopted Corridor Study does recommend entry portals at various locations in the City. Attached for your reference is a copy of the Southlake Corridor Study as approved. ■ Corridor Study Recommendations: An overview of the portal recommendations of the study would be that there are portals of various emphasis recommended depending on the anticipated exposure they might have. At the time of adoption of the study it was recognized that the design for these portals would be determined at a later date and that the sketches included were intended to provide a vision as to the benefits obtained from a comprehensive entry portal plan. The "Portal Concepts" summary to follow will outline recommendations consistent with the generic approach recommended by the Corridor Study. • Recommended Deferral Items: There are portions of the Corridor Study recommendations that probably should not be pursued at this time due to unresolved construction issues, particularly related to SH 114. These might be summarized as follows: 1) Bridge overpass landscaping and signage: Items such as the landscaping for off- ramps and at intersections as noted on pages 8, 9, and 15 of the Corridor Study and signage on the bridge overpass as noted on page 10 may be deferred until final determination of SH 114 construction parameters. Entry Portal Concept Development- November 25, 1998 Page 1 of 7 f ( 6- I • r . • 2) Median treatments: Median treatments and plantings such as those shown on pages 20 and 22 of the Corridor Study could not be installed at this point without reconstruction of FM 1709. They may be incorporated at a future point, or incorporated into the design of any divided arterial roadways we have in'the future. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Our motivation for moving forward with this issue at this time has two components 1)we have an opportunity to develop a portal at Davis and FM 1709 on our own property and establish the standard and 2)recent developments including Gateway Plaza and a recent submittal at the northeast corner of FM 1938 (Davis Blvd) and Continental requires our action regarding the need for a portal site at these locations. PORTAL CONCEPTS In an effort to offer a starting point for discussion,I have generated the attached conceptual drawings for entry portals of various scales. It is my recommendation that we establish a materials palette that is similar for all entry portals/features in the city to provide continuity and greater identification consistency throughout the city. The concept for various emphasis on portals is as follows: ■ Major Portals: These portals would be the most significant entry portals in the city. 1111 Tentatively their locations would be as follows: 1) Gateway Plaza Portal: Located at the northwest corner of FM 1709 and SH 114 at the easternmost end of the approved Gateway Plaza retail development. 2) Pearson Portal: Located at the northeast corner of FM 1709 at Pearson on property currently owned by the city. 3) Davis Portal: Located at the northeast corner of FM 1938 (Davis Blvd) at Continental. The draft concept behind the major portals is shown in exhibits MP-1 and MP-2 attached. . Basically this entry feature would be a significant monument sign with features as follows: a) Approximately an 8'height(graphic person shown is 6'tall)with columns 9'-10'high and 24'width(main wall). b) Stone construction of a color and texture similar to Southridge Lakes community building. Entire structure would be contained or bordered by stone edging to allow for flood irrigation and easier maintenance. The planting area behind the dominant wall would be a raised bed approximately 3'off the ground. • c) Cut-stone"Southlake" sign with beveled recessed edges. Similar cut-stone capping on the columns and the top edge of the dominant wall,wing walls, and rear walls. Entry Portal Concept Development-November 25, 1998 Page 2 of 7 • d) Flood lighting on the"Southlake"name,with lights hidden by evergreen shrubbery. e) American flag behind wall, continuously uplit from ground lights. f) Evergreen shrubs as foundation plantings and screens (dwarf chinese holly, dwarf burford holly,and dwarf yaupon holly)with color accent shrubs(dwarf crepe myrtle in front groundcover bed of asian jasmine, and tree crepe myrtle to rear on both sides of flag) and beds of seasonal color in front, backed by borders of liriope ground cover. The approximate area needed for the portal as shown in Exhibit MP-2, allowing for a 10' perimeter from all edges, is approximately 2,825 square feet. This area may change, even dramatically, depending on the location of any existing trees, topography, or other unique site conditions. • Secondary Portals: This scale of entry portal would be used in locations that are not as dominant as the major portals. They might be used in any future medians for significant roadways, or adjacent to roadways near municipal facilities or secondary entry points to the city such as South White Chapel north of Bear Creek. The draft concept behind the secondary portals is shown in Exhibit SP-1 attached. Basically • this entry feature would be a monument sign structure with features as follows: a) Approximately a 4'height(graphic person shown is 6'tall)with columns 5'-6'high and 14' long(between tall columns). b) Stone construction of a color and texture similar to Southridge Lakes. c) Cut-stone "Southlake" sign with beveled recessed edges. Similar cut-stone capping on the columns and the top edge of walls. d) Flood lighting on the"Southlake"name,with lights hidden by evergreen shrubbery. e) Plantings dependent upon the sign location, similar in concept to the major portal. • Accent Features: The concept here is represented conceptually by the Exhibit AF-1 attached. Similar to the recommendations on page 25 of the Corridor Study,the purpose of this feature would be to have the ability to utilize a smaller scale but consistent urban design feature throughout the city wherever the need might arise. There could be the possibility of donations of art / sculpture for the park or other locations. Over time we may want to attempt to coordinate a comprehensive graphic approach for signage internal to the parks, at park entries, or other municipal facilities and these materials could be incorporated. They • could also be located at secondary street locations where unique features may be required. Details of this concept are as follows: Entry Portal Concept Development-November 25, 1998 Page 3 of 7 IIa) Approximately a 4'height. b) Stone construction of a color and texture similar to Southridge Lakes. c) Cut-stone"Southlake" sign with beveled recessed edges. Potentially recessed accent areas on other faces of the feature. d) Plantings dependent upon the sign location, similar in concept to the major portal. PROCESSING We have not really discussed the Council's desires as it pertains to formal processing(if needed)for these types of improvements. We will need to discuss Council's directions regarding the process for approval of the portal concepts,in particular the extent of involvement of the Planning and Zoning Commission or any other bodies. The Charter states in the Purpose and Objective section for the P&Z that they can make recommendations to Council on"all nature of...public improvements ... (and) civic improvements."Although this does not state "...shall make...", it would appear open to the discretion of Council as to the P&Z's extent of involvement. FEEDBACK The purpose for forwarding this to you at this time is to allow Councilmembers time to review a large amount of material and to solicit their feedback. Please jot down any comments and forward them to me or I would be glad to set up a meeting to discuss the concepts at Councilmember's IDconvenience. It is my understanding that we would then compile the feedback comments and place the item on an upcoming Council agenda for Council's consideration. • I welcome the opportunity to discuss these issues with you or Councilmembers at your convenience. GL enc. Southlake Corridor Study adopted August 1995 Exhibits MP-1 and MP-2: Major Portal Concepts . Exhibit SP-1: Secondary Portal Concept Exhibit AF-1: Accent Feature Concept L:\ComDev\WP-FILES\PROJECTS\CORRIDOR\Portals\CONCEPT3.doc LCIN.m�WP•NIFSPROIECORRIOMPORTAISCONCFPTI WPD • Entry Portal Concept Development- November 25, 1998 Page 4 of 7 1 ( 8-Y . ., „_ , ,, ., ,, i- J 11 1'n „ ' 0 1 • T p 0 00,p ° °/ •••1• 11 Ls, y' 1 r !�) I T1... •a 1 11 i �o O10 1 •• I` 1 I r. Ir `G'•,��r 1, 1We • • °i00 • Ii 11 Y1r0�1 1 0 1.0 ■00 0 O D••o• I Ids J�d�� • LL�� . • 1 " , ,,, 0�0. 1 \ • I 0 • /i - y ■ w �� �JJ r � �r7a't .'d.J=���G=.'_—J. �,�-ram` ' li L =j 1 S O U T H L A K E I VilD ` r d ..7-' E_,..,%, - % (AV .--��--„ . u • r"I pes, a c ri, • 1e-r7-541 MP-1 MAJOR PORTAL CONCEPT MP-1 Elevation View 10-15-98 III 4„\,0ir '!1 �111111� f��'� '�'l� tAvf \ '4 rig Ng, ,52 • • Ps A \ .+� �►,� . , -mo , � . Y D gH *EGAL.. �MOW GAP -.T T T �" T � �' "„oleo41PrW.101te$e�a��� ,v .i,„, 1.:"_, ,i41.4.,34, cl ,.),,,5.4 ,(14. 184.4‘ w,,,,s . A.soio., . . 1 --z-- •144- .4<44,ex- ._44r-7-14. t \ ip... ��/iB, �, . `I •A.441.1\.4 `i 0.t,iC,-t I l,i I,,,10.1"-, ,„ d„ . ii ;` TAS�triHE ,me— I,,. .I4* N. ,O-` '.iei ) \e - pi �pOJOp 1 Or , S�, \-.006: ,,,o> gyp;' �- -Ate ) /\\�`, -^.s ,p`�Uat1�®, --, ,--- ,, r. V•` SEAsOH=1=oLOR ---J pppO Off— SEAS=NFL c=LOR —' / - T---7 r1f i s-roti c MN 1n• l NMI 11 i--110 -- MP-2 MAJOR PORTAL CONCEPT Plan View 10-15-98 Entry Portal Concept Development- November 25, 1998 Page 5 of 7 11B'S_ • ,._,„,_, ". i . ISOU T H L A K E ' P-1 SECONDARY PORTAL CONCEPT Elevation View 10-15-98 q,-(1,,,, O -- Jy 46 -4'-J 1 t �A�f; ®-----.. _____,_----..._ 41k- - ' ______.-- , . %4aNle *Mr ------- - - ' ____---' 44Akith..1 k,0 $./ _—___ '— %%%0J0 xi( )_ __--4 ktrofto 1------'4.0--,_..... ...._ r....-4.-—,-.) __ '- --. c--":±?,.,.--- _Ni" f c\-7-7 .,vrvir YT AF-1 ACCENT FEATURE CONCEPT 111 Perspective View 10-15-98 Entry Portal Concept Development-November 25, 1998 Page 6 of 7 r . . . • Figure 1-Portal Plan I • • Eottz-ht•)10%. ,J Southlake Corridor Study L Dula"Moos&Madam I 1 PlatAbg&Men D. r-k.i\V 11 1.10.4 Itic.4.1.6111... rj "hr". [-- __ irdenialm..o.i. •PM 11, 1.____I-romff io ii riC1-1 ) 1 [ '-' r—— • 1 t t . . . I i . I 9 WESTLAKE I 1 III .. "ifiT gaL I GRAPEVINE (-1 -, _. 0 i I V k 11i ii ril'i 17-7..".. ;UM ON ' -' 01 .:-•.. .11—).'I"'W <046P i KELLER 1 1 i 410 1 I 4-7T "'""-- „...4:. ,;:iK:;71,F.; li-(14-10;.;111724MitesnWiliirt.42e4s.;::M.:.. ,--1. ..c4N . 4 .1 :< 'mamma. 1 1 I . 31e-7.1 PoRTAt '6' ....a'"47rIL row COMINTM.MO Z 1 IiRCIAMINCII W. COLLEYVILLE% Entry Portal Concept Development- November 25, 1998 Page 7 of 7 EL