Loading...
Item 6Case No. ZA21-0049 S T A F F R E P O R T November 18, 2021 CASE NO: ZA21-0049 PROJECT: Site Plan for HTeaO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Karthik & Associates Realty LLC, Bowman is requesting approval of a Site Plan for HTeaO on property described as Lot 5R1R1, Parker’s Corner, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 190 Davis Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #11. DETAILS: The proposed HteaO is located on approximately 1.35 acres at 190 Davis Blvd., generally located approximately 625 feet south of the intersection of Davis Blvd. and W. Southlake Blvd. The site has residential property to the east and south; agriculturally zoned property to the west; and commercial property (Sonic) to the north. The applicant is requesting approval of a Site Plan for a proposed 2,250 square foot retail tea store building with drive-thru service located on approximately 1.35 acres on the west side of Davis Blvd. south of the Sonic restaurant. The proposed access will be through an existing shared driveway with Sonic. The current zoning is “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District with “C-2” Local Retail Commercial District uses. The proposed use and horizontal layout of the plan appear to generally conform with the current zoning and concept plan approved under Ordinance 480-356 (ZA00-133). The Site Data Summary Chart is below. Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “S-P-2” Land Use Designation Retail Commercial/100-Year Flood Plain Gross/Net Acreage 60,061 sq. ft. (1.379 ac.) Total Building Floor Area 2,250 sq. ft. Building Height/ Number of Stories 19’ 1 story Open Space % 53.12% Impervious Coverage % 46.88% Total Parking Required (1/100 sf) 23 Total Parking Spaces Provided 33 Case No. ZA21-0049 VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1) Ord. No. 480, Section 43.9.c.1(b) requires structures having a 6,000 square foot or less footprint to be constructed with a pitched roof. A variance is requested to allow a flat roof with parapet. 2) Ord. No. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.(c) requires rooftop mechanical screening to be accomplished by either the construction of a parapet or mansard roof or by an architectural feature that is integral to the building’s design. The fencing of or enclosure of individual mechanical units is not permitted. A variance is requested to allow the mechanical equipment to be screened by vertical screening elements that are compatible with the finish materials of the main building façade. The vertical screening elements must be shown on the elevations at the time of site plan approval. 3) Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 39.6 requires an 8’ screen meeting the material standards of Section 39.2(b) to be constructed where a non-residential use abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract of land. Ord. No. 480, Section 42, requires an 8’ opaque fence meeting the material requirements in Section 39.2(b) with a Type F1 bufferyard. A variance is requested to allow no fence along the southern boundary abutting the residentially zoned property. 4) Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 33.19 and Subdivision Ord. No. 483, as amended, Section 5.06.B.3 requires construction of trails as shown on the City’s Master Pathways Plan. An 8’ or greater multi-use trail is shown across the property to the west of the subject property in the creek area. Since the location of the trail shown on the Pathways Plan is approximate, the future alignment of the trail should be considered with this development. A variance is requested to allow no trail to be constructed on the property. 5) Ord. No. 480, Section 42 requires a 10’ Type ‘F1’ bufferyard along the south property line and a 5’ Type ‘A’ bufferyard along the west property line. A variance is requested to allow a deficiency in the required canopy and accent trees for the 10’ Type ‘F1’ bufferyard and to allow the 5’ Type ‘A’ west bufferyard in the location shown. The following variances to Driveway Ord. No. 634 were approved with the Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA00-133) in 2001: 1) The drive intersecting Davis Boulevard required a minimum driveway spacing of 500' from the nearest drive at the time of rezoning. A variance was granted to allow the driveway to be located 431' from the driveway to the north (See Driveway Ord. 634, Section 5-Table #1). 2) A minimum storage length of 75' is required. A variance was granted to allow approximately 40' of stacking depth. (See Driveway Ord. 634, Section 5 for design criteria). ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of a Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map Case No. ZA21-0049 (C) Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated November 18, 2021 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses Half Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only) Presentation Variance Request Letter Plans SPIN Report 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. Attachment A ZA21-0049 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Karthik & Associates Realty LLC APPLICANT: Bowman PROPERTY SITUATION: 190 Davis Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5R1R1, Parker’s Corner LAND USE CATEGORY: Retail Commercial / 100-Year Flood Plain CURRENT ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan Zoning District HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1957. - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA00-133) for Lot 5R1, Parker’s Corner from “AG” Agricultural District and “C-2” Local Retail Commercial District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District with “C-2” Local Retail Commercial District uses was approved March 6, 2001. A Site Plan (ZA00-134) for Sonic Drive-In was approved February 20, 2001. - A Plat Revision (ZA00-035) for Lots 5R1R1, 5R1R2 and 5R2R1 was approved February 20, 2001 and filed April 6, 2001. SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The 2035 future land use designation is Retail Commercial and 100-Year Flood Plain: Retail Commercial Purpose and Definition: The Retail Commercial category is a lower- to medium-intensity commercial category providing for neighborhood-type retail shopping facilities and general commercial support activities. It is intended to provide limited local retail and/or office uses which serve neighborhoods in close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this category will be compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby maintaining the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This category is intended to encourage comprehensively planned developments. In areas where the Retail Commercial designation is adjacent to residentially zoned properties or areas with a residential designation on the Land Use Plan, lower intensity activities such as office or office-related uses should be planned adjacent to the residential uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, and Office Commercial categories previously discussed. 100-Year Flood Plain Purpose and Definition: The Floodplain category illustrates areas designated by the August 1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps as being in the 100-year floodplain. The “floodplain” is an expanse of natural vegetation and wildlife and should be preserved as natural open area. Within the floodplain is “floodway” that must be kept free of encroachment in order that the 100- year flood may be carried without harmful increases in the height of flood waters. Although it is not to be encouraged, the portion of the floodplain not in the floodway may be reclaimed for development under certain Case No. Attachment A ZA21-0049 Page 2 circumstances if in accordance with FEMA regulations. The designated land use for areas of reclaimed floodplain is that of the immediately adjacent land use category. This designation may also include environmentally sensitive areas, habitats, or wetlands that may not be in FEMA identified floodplains. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan Davis Blvd. is a 7-lane undivided, 130-foot wide right-of way street south of the shared driveway to the Southlake city limits. Recently, Davis Blvd. has been reconstructed into a divided 6-lane road with the intersection improvements at W. Southlake Blvd./ Davis Blvd. and the widening of Randol Mill Avenue. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Master Pathways Plan shows a future <8’ multi-use trail along the west side of Davis Blvd., so a 5’ sidewalk is required to be constructed at the time of construction. The 5’ sidewalk is shown on the plan. Note that an 8’ multi-use trail exists along the west side of Davis from the driveway for Sonic north to the intersection of W. Southlake Blvd. and Davis Blvd. An 8’ or greater multi-use trail is shown across the property to the west of the subject property in the creek area. Since the location of the trail shown on the Pathways Plan is approximate, the future alignment of the trail should be considered with this development. The applicant has agreed to dedicate a 10’ pedestrian access easement along the west property line. A variance is requested to allow no trail to be constructed on the property. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The property is currently accessed off Davis Blvd. by a shared driveway with the existing Sonic restaurant. Currently, the shared driveway is located at the end of the existing median on Davis Blvd. and across the street from an existing emergency access drive into the Winding Ridge residential subdivision. Traffic Impact Please see the Traffic Memo attached separately for the traffic impact and proposed modifications to the current driveway. TREE PRESERVATION: Since the Concept Plan for the property was approved in 2000, the property is regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. The requirements for tree preservation and removal are as stated in Section 6.7c of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. See the Landscape Administrator’s comments in Attachment ‘C’ of this report. The applicant may choose that the development be regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. UTILITIES: There is an existing 8” water line on the west side of Davis Blvd. that will serve this development. There is an existing 10” sanitary sewer line that runs across the west side of the property to serve the development. DRAINAGE: Drainage is generally sheet flow from east to west across the property to a creek that runs across the west end of the property. Case No. Attachment A ZA21-0049 Page 3 CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on July 27, 2021. Please see the SPIN Report attached separately. A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on January 25, 2021. Please see the 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report attached separately. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated November 18, 2021. General Development Standards Applies? Comments Overlay Regulations Yes The property is in the Corridor Overlay. Building Articulation Yes Complies Masonry Standards Yes Complies Impervious Coverage Yes Complies Bufferyards Yes Variance requested to south bufferyard fence and plant material requirements location of west bufferyard. Interior Landscape Yes Complies subject to review comments being addressed. Tree Preservation Yes The applicant may choose Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B or 585-E. Sidewalks Yes A 5’ sidewalk is required to be constructed along the west side of Davis at the time of construction. A variance is requested to allow the 8’ multi-use trail to the west of the property to not be constructed on the property. The applicant has agreed to dedicate a 10’ pedestrian access easement along the west property line. Case No. Attachment B ZA21-0049 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 1 REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA21-0049 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 11/18/21 Project Name: Site Plan - HTeaO APPLICANT: Ryan Safford OWNER: Bowman Karthink & Associates Realty, LLC, LP 1120 S. Capital of Texas, Bldg. 3 190 Davis Blvd. Austin, TX Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (972) 497-2993 Phone: E-mail: rsafford@bowman.com E-mail: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/09/21 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. 1. The Site Plan must conform to the underlying zoning district. 2. A Plat Revision must be processed and recorded to abandon the 24’ access easement 3. Please make the following changes to the Site Plan (C1.0): a. Label the adjacent properties and properties across adjoining rights of way with owner's name, existing zoning, and land use map designation ("L.U.D.=_____"). Add the land use designation to the property to the west (Office Commercial and 100-Year Flood Plain) and add the current zoning to all surrounding properties including properties across the Davis Blvd. (RE-5 and AG to the south, AG to the west, S-P-2 to the north and TZD to the east across Davis Blvd. Also add the land use designation to the properties across Davis Blvd. to the east (Mixed Use). b. Show, label and dimension the width of the right of way and traveled roadway for Davis Blvd. c. Correct the graphic scale. It is showing 1” = 10’ instead of 1” = 20’. d. Correct in the building height in the Site Data Table to 19’. e. Please show the building, driveways, canopies etc. on the lot to the north to show how the ingress/egress functions for the site as a whole since both lots share a common driveway onto Davis Blvd. Show and label travel arrows and other traffic control measures that demonstrate how traffic conflicts between vehicles entering the HTeaO use and vehicles leaving the Sonic use will be controlled. f. Revise the entrances and exits to the building so that they are consistent on the elevation and floor plan (entrances on north, south and west sides of building shown) and site plan (entrances on north and west sides shown). g. Show, label and dimension the widths of all easements on and adjacent to the site. Please refer to the plat that was included in the submittal. A 35’ construction easement is shown across the property and a 15’ utility easement is shown to straddle the south property line. h. Show and label the width and type of bufferyards along each boundary in accordance with the approved “S-P-2” zoning (see Landscape Administrator’s comments). i. Remove the chart that contains the building setbacks and landscape buffers. The building setbacks are shown and labeled on the plan and the landscape buffer Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 2 information does not match the information in the bufferyard summary chart, which is correct. 4. Show and label fire lanes in compliance with the City Fire Code (see Fire Marshal comments below). 5. Show and label the width and type of surface for all pedestrian walks, malls, and open areas for use by tenants or the public. Provide sidewalks and/or trails in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended and the Master Pathways Plan. The Master Pathways Plan shows a future <8’ multi-use trail along the west side of Davis Blvd. A 5’ sidewalk is required to be constructed at the time of construction. The 5’ sidewalk is shown on the plan. An 8’ or greater multi-use trail is required across the property to the west of the subject property in the creek area. The applicant has agreed to dedicate a 10’ pedestrian access easement along the west property line. A variance is requested to allow no trail to be constructed. 6. Show any areas intended for outside storage (if any) and method of screening. 7. A minimum 8’ solid fence meeting the requirements of Ordinance 480, Section 39.2(b) along the south boundary. Is required per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 39.6.a and with the 10’ Type ‘F1’ bufferyard that is shown on the Concept Plan approved with the S-P-2 zoning district. A variance is requested to allow no fence along the south boundary. 8. Ord. No. 480, Section 42 requires a Type ‘F1” bufferyard along the south property line and a 5’ Type ‘A’ bufferyard along the west property line. A variance is requested to allow a deficiency in the required canopy and accent trees for the 10’ Type ‘F1’ bufferyard and to allow the 5’ Type ‘A’ west bufferyard in the location shown. 9. Show any intended lighting. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. 10. The following comments are regarding the elevations: a. Label the materials and colors on the elevations and provide a material sample board. b. A minimum 8’ tall masonry screen wall matching the principal building with a solid metal access gate is required for all trash receptacle enclosures. The enclosure shown on the elevations shows a wood gate. Please revise the elevation to show the required solid metal gates and label the color. c. Per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.b – Corridor Overlay District, Roof Design Standards: In an effort to screen rooftop mechanical equipment, other appurtenances, and flat or built-up roofs, all structures having a 6,000 square feet or less footprint shall be constructed with a pitched roof as defined in Section 43.12 of this ordinance. Those structures having a footprint greater than 6,000 square feet shall be constructed with either a pitched, parapet, or mansard roof system (enclosed on all sides). Standing seam metal roofs shall be constructed of a factory-treated, non-metallic, matte finish. Metal roofs with lapped-seamed construction, bituminous built-up roofs, and flat, membrane-type roofs which are visible from adjacent public ROW shall be prohibited. The proposed flat roof does not comply with the pitched roof requirement (two or more slopes). A variance is requested to allow the roof as shown. Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 3 d. Per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.c – Corridor Overlay District: Mechanical Equipment Screening: All buildings must be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes shall be visible from SH 114, Carroll Avenue between SH 114 and FM 1709, FM 1709, and FM 1938 and any adjacent public ROW. This shall include equipment on the roof, on the ground or otherwise attached to the building or located on the site. Rooftop mechanical equipment and / or other rooftop appurtenance screening shall be accomplished by either the construction of 1) the roof systems described in subparagraph (b) above or 2) an architectural feature which is integral to the building’s design and ensures that such equipment is not visible from adjacent public ROW. The fencing of or enclosure of individual mechanical units shall not be permitted except as described above. All rooftop mechanicals or architectural features described herein shall be shown on the required building elevations at the time of site plan approval. The rooftop screening proposed does not comply with the above requirements. A variance is requested to allow the mechanical equipment to be screened by vertical screening elements that are compatible with the finish materials of the main building façade. The vertical screening elements must be shown on the elevations at the time of site plan approval. Show and label the rooftop screening on the elevations. * For property within the Corridor Overlay Zone elevations must comply with the horizontal and vertical articulation requirements in Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.d. on all facades visible from Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938). The elevations and floor plan comply with the horizontal and vertical articulation requirements. * Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.a is required on proposed buildings. Per Masonry Ord. No. 557-A, Section 1.e, with the exception of barns and storage buildings in the "AG" zoning district, all nonresidential buildings located within 500 feet of the R.O.W. line along State Highway No. 114 and within 300 feet of the R.O.W. line along State Highway No. 26, Farm-to- Market Road 1709 and Farm-to-Market Road 1938 shall have at least eighty percent (80%) of all exterior walls, excluding doors, constructed of masonry materials or glass. The composite plank siding shown does not meet the definition of a masonry material. No exterior wall shows more than 20% to be covered in the plank siding, so the building meets all masonry requirements as shown. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. Since the Concept Plan for the property was approved in 2000, the property is regulated by the Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 4 Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. The following requirements for tree preservation and removal as stated in Section 6.7c of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B are as follows. The applicant may choose that the development be regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. 2. There are existing tree trees proposed to be removed and mitigated that would not be required to mitigate under the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B and 585-E. The following trees which are proposed to be removed do not fall within the building pad, fire lanes, parking areas, or utility easements where utilities are proposed to be installed, and their removal is required to be mitigated. Trees 304, 305, 347, 348. The total diameter inches of the protected trees proposed to be removed and required to mitigate is forty inches (40”). 7.0 TREE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURES 7.1 GENERALLY: If required by Section 6, above, the following procedures shall apply to any person who alters a protected tree for which a permit is required. 7.2 TREE REPLACEMENT: If a person alters a protected tree for which a permit is required, the person shall replace the protected tree with a quality tree as designated in the Landscape Ordinance and approved by the Landscape Administrator. This tree replacement requirement is not meant to supplant good site planning. Tree replacement will be considered only after all design alternatives which could save more existing trees have been evaluated and reasonably rejected. a. Size and Number: A sufficient number of trees shall be planted to equal or exceed, in caliper, the diameter of each tree altered, measured at 4.5' above ground level. Each replacement tree shall be a minimum of 3" caliper at one foot above ground level, and seven feet in height when planted. b. Location: Each replacement tree should be planted on the same property as the tree which was altered. However, if the replacement tree cannot be planted on the same property in accordance with universally accepted arborists’ standards, the Landscape Administrator may: 1. require replacement on private property if also approved by the Chief of Building Services, 2. require replacement on public property, or 3. require payment to the Reforestation Fund in accordance with Section 7.3, below. Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 5 c. Responsibility for Replacing Trees: The Landscape Administrator will determine the agent responsible for replacing the trees, the time of replacement, and the location of the replacement trees. The requirement to replace trees shall run with the land. d. Delayed Replacement: If the Landscape Administrator approves the planting of replacement trees more than 30 days after the alteration of protected trees, the applicant shall provide the Landscape Administrator with an affidavit that all replacement trees will be planted within six months. The Landscape Administrator may require the person to furnish the City a cash deposit or surety bond in the approximate amount of the cost to replace the trees. e. Duration: A replacement tree that dies within three years of the date it was planted must be replaced by another replacement tree. This requirement runs with the land. 7.3 REFORESTATION FUND: If required by the Landscape Administrator, the applicant, instead of compliance with Section 7.2, above, shall make a payment into the Reforestation Fund or other specifically dedicated fund. The funds shall be used only for purchasing and planting trees on private property approved by the Landscape Administrator and the Chief of Building Services, on public property, for acquiring wooded property which shall remain in a naturalistic state in perpetuity, or for establishing a landscape or wildlife preserve or similar nature area. * If the property was regulated by the tree preservation Ordinance 585-E, the proposed tree preservation would comply with the existing tree cover preservation requirements. There is 67.4% of existing tree cover and a minimum of 40% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. A maximum of 40.8% of the existing tree cover is proposed to remain. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 6 approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. Provide a north arrow and scale on the Landscape Plans and Tree Conservation Plan. 2. Label all required bufferyards by width and type on both the Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 3. On the Site Plan the east bufferyard is incorrectly labeled. It is a 15’ – S type bufferyard. It is correct within the Bufferyards Summary Chart. 4. The interior landscape provided shows 28 shrubs to be provided and only 13 shrubs are shown on the plans (7 Dwarf Burford Hollies and 6 Pinkie Indian Hawthornes). The rest of the shrubs are accounted for in the bufferyard counts. Please provide 15 additional shrubs in the interior landscaping (see comment below). 5. The landscape areas at the ends of rows of parking do not contain the required landscape plant material. Interior landscape area at the ends of rows of parking are considered as required and provided parking landscaping and must contain the required plant material. All parking planter islands in parking areas shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses or seasonal color. Planter islands which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2) understory/accent trees for the required canopy tree. 6. Show the existing trees proposed to be preserved on the Landscape Plans. 7. There is a comment in the Bufferyards Summary Chart that existing trees numbers 669 and 670 are proposed to use as existing tree credits in the north bufferyard. There are no trees listed or shown on the Tree Conservation Plan with the numbers 669 and 670. 8. The minimum required plant material is not being provided within the south bufferyard. In the Bufferyards Summary Chart there is a note stating that the existing tree canopy prevents the planting of all required accent trees, and there are only two (2) existing small trees proposed to be preserved within the south bufferyard. A variance is requested to allow a deficiency in the required canopy and accent trees for the 10’ Type ‘F1’ bufferyard and to allow the 5’ Type ‘A’ west bufferyard in the location shown. 9. Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for required plantings within the north bufferyard. Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. * Per the approved Concept Plan for the property, an 8’ screening device is required to be provided along the south property boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance to the fence requirement but is showing an 8’ opaque wooden fence on the Landscape Plans. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 7 Public Works/Engineering Review Jeff Ginn, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8100 E-mail: jginn@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of the civil construction plans. 2. Review City Construction Plan Checklist, https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/DocumentCenter/View/23465/Construction-Plan-Checklist 3. Review and include City notes and details. https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/152/Engineering- Design-Standards 4. Drawing sets must be 22”x34”. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET: (Provided) SITE PLAN COMMENTS: (None) DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 5. Please provide existing & proposed conditions Drainage Area Map(s) showing the drainage calculations for the property. Please include tables listing the existing and proposed 1-year, 10- year and 100-year flows to show that the proposed improvements are not creating additional storm water runoff and the stormwater system meets City Criteria. * Floodplain Study Provided. Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. * Floodplain Study Provided. If detention is not being proposed for the full increase in runoff, then documentation supporting and certifying the reduction in detention will be required prior to approval of construction plans. Memorandum shall be signed and sealed by a registered PE. Please ensure that the drainage models and memo are re-submitted with the Civil Construction Plans. Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: (NONE) UTILITY PLAN COMMENTS: * Utility design shall meet the requirements of The International Plumbing Code, 2018 Edition, as amended by the City per Ordinance No. 1212. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 8 INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in: https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. * NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. * Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of improvements on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. *=Denotes informational comment that don’t need to be addressed until Civil Construction Submittals. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access fire lanes need to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, a minimum of 24 feet wide with 6-inch red striping that contains 4-inch white lettering that states “FIRE LANE NO PARKING” every 25 feet, and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) Fire lane must enter the property off Davis Boulevard and dead-end 150 feet into the property. (If the fire lane is designed as indicated on the plans, a turn-a-round must be provided for fire apparatus at the terminal end of the fire lane) Case No. Attachment C ZA21-0049 Page 9 Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. General Informational Comments * A SPIN meeting is was held on July 27, 2021. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in S-P-2 zoning district and Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA21-0049 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES ‘ SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. CFT NV DEVELOPMENTS LLC C2 2325 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.75 NR 2. MCNACK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC SP1 2335 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.49 NR 3. TUCKER 23 LLC C2 170 DAVIS BLVD 0.24 NR 4. ENCORE RETAIL DEV CO LP SP2 180 DAVIS BLVD 1.55 NR 5. KARTHINK & ASSOCIATES REALTY L SP2 190 DAVIS BLVD 1.35 F 6. LYNBA HOLDINGS LLC AG 220 DAVIS BLVD 0.72 NR 7. ANKINZ LLC SP2 2350 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.76 NR 8. SLM DUNHILL LLC C3 2225 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.63 NR 9. MBI, PRYSCA N TZD 316 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.27 NR 10. DESAI, BHAVIN TZD 320 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.22 NR 11. PEDDIREDDY, SHIVA TZD 400 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.27 NR 12. KARTHIK & ASSOCIATES REALTY LL C2 2345 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.99 NR 13. AJLOUNI, RAED AG 2415 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.54 NR 14. LYNBA HOLDINGS LLC RE5 200 DAVIS BLVD 5.11 NR 15. DAI, JUN TZD 404 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.28 NR 16. RIDGEVIEW AT SOUTHLAKE HOMEWON TZD 324 WINDING RIDGE TRL 1.74 NR 17. RAMNANI, KISHORE TZD 408 WINDING RIDGE TRL 0.27 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA21-0049 Page 2 18. TUCKER 23 LLC C2 2301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.11 NR 19. TAK ENTERPRISES INC SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.09 NR 20. DAN AND MARY HEARN FAMILY TRUS SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.09 NR 21. QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 105 BROCK DR 0.48 NR 22. TAK ENTERPRISES INC SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.82 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent within 300’: Nineteen (19) Responses Received within 300’: One (1)